Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
18-105080
AkCITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity November 30, 2018 CfTY GALL 33325'8th Avenue uth Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Brent Lambeth brent@blamarchitect.com Brent Lambeth Architect LLC 355 NW 481h Street Seattle, WA 98107 RE: File No's. 18-105080-00-UP & 18-105081-00-SE; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION SDA Hispanic Church, 32115 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Lambeth: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your October 30, 2018, Process III and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Master Land Use (MLU) application. Your proposed project includes construction of a new approximately 12,000 square -foot church, with associated site improvements on a vacant property. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045, within 28 days of receiving an MLU application, the city shall determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence a Notice of Complete Application. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045 and 14.10.020, the application is deemed complete as of November 27, 2018. The complete application determination is based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set forth in FWRC 19.15.040 and 14.10.020. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to the City of Federal Way codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. A 120-day time line for reviewing the Process III application has started as of November 27, 2018. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line will be stopped at any time the city requires corrections and/or additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that corrections and/or additional information are needed. The Development Review Committee (DRC) staff is preparing initial technical review comments that will be forwarded to you in separate correspondence. Technical review comments may result in a request for additional information and revisions in order to comply with applicable code requirements. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Formal processing and review of your application will now begin. The City will prepare a notice of application board, and you will need to post this board on site on December 6 or 7, 2018. Further posting instructions will follow. City staff will also provide other notice as required by City Code including posting the city's official notice boards and publication in the Federal Way Mirror within 14 days of this letter. Mr. Lambeth November 30, 2018 Page 2 CLOSING If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me by email at jim.harris@,cityoffederalway.com, or by phone at 253-835-2652. Sincerely, Jim Harris Senior Planner c: Eric Davis, WWC of SDA, 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA 98001; eric.davisfr'wc.npuc.0ri: Kevin Peterson, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer, via email 18-105080-00-UP Doc ID. 78493 Ms. Vall-Spinosa May 5, 2006 Page 2 This decision shall not waive compliance with City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please call Isaac Conlen, Senior Planner, at 253-835-2643. Sincerely, Kathy McClung, Director Community Development Services enc: Findings for Project Approval Approved Site Plan, resubmitted 10/25/05 Approved Elevations, resubmitted 2/15/06 Approved Landscape Plan, resubmitted 10/25/05 c: Isaac Conlen, Senior Planner Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst Greg Brozek, South King Fire Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District aP <i«a. e4 0 FG l Ic SO 10 a o ?4 J 3 5- SA011c 3S SPJ\ vt �7 C .I 05-103587 Doc- 1.1) 36171 May 5, 2006 Terra Vall-Spinosa Panattoni Development Company 16400 Southcenter Pkwy Seattle, WA 98188 RE: File #05-103587-00-UP; EAST CAMPUS TERRACE (LOT G) Dear Ms. Vall-Spinosa: The City of Federal Way has completed the administrative review and hereby issues approval of the proposal to construct two, two-story office buildings totaling approximately 60,000 square feet with associated parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. The site plan and landscaping plan, submitted on October 25, 2005, and elevations submitted on February 15, 2006, are hereby approved per the enclosed Findings for Project Approval. Additional requirements may be provided as City departments review the building permits. REVIEW PROCESSES REQUIRED The site is located in an Office Park-1 (OP-1) zoning district. Office use is permitted in this zone subject to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-826 (vested from 1994) and the August 1994 Concomitant Zoning Agreement, and is reviewed through the Process III, Project Approval, process. Project approval does not grant license to begin any type of site work. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION The applicant must substantially complete construction for the development activity within five years after the final decision of the City, or the decision becomes void. An extension may be granted, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-409, through a written request submitted to the Department of Community Development Services (33325 81h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718) at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the decision. Any person who received a copy of this decision may appeal this decision. The appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Department of Community Development Services (address above), and be accompanied by the established fee, within 14 calendar days after the effective date of the decision. The effective date of decision is May 5, 2006. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusions of the Director of Community Development disputed by the person filing the appeal. CITY OF Federal Way FINDINGS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL EAST CAMPUS TERRACE LOT G File No: 05-103587-00-UP The following are findings for recommending approval of the proposed East Campus Terrace Lot G office buildings located one lot south of South 320th Street on the west side of Weyerhaeuser Way South, in Federal Way. Project Description The applicant proposes construction of two, two-story office buildings with associated parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. The buildings total approximately 60,000 square feet. The site is located in an Office Park-1 (OP-1) zoning district. Office use is permitted in this zone subject to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-826 (vested from 1994) and the August 1994 Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA), and is reviewed through the Process III, Project Approval, process. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) designation for the subject site is Office Park. 2. The subject site is a 3.27-acre unimproved lot located on the west side of Weyerhaeuser Way South, one lot south of South 320th Street in the City of Federal Way. The site is vegetated with evergreen trees and underbrush. The adjacent uses and zones are as follows: North: PSE substation, zoned OP-1 South: Vacant office park parcels, zoned OP-1 (site of future office/church) East: Weyerhaeuser Way South and Vacant office park parcels, zoned OP-1 West: Vacant office park lots, zoned OP-1 3. The proposal has been reviewed for consistency with the February 9, 1999, Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS, file number SEP98-0039), which was issued in conjunction with the East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan. (Based on the same ITE land use classification, the proposed office buildings are not expected to generate any additional trips beyond the previous analysis.) As such, no Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is required. The current proposal was also found to be consistent with all remaining environmental elements of the previous MDNS. Therefore, the City's Responsible Environmental Official finds it is SEPA compliant, based on consistency with the previous environmental analysis, and no further environmental information or review is required. 4. No environmentally sensitive areas were identified on the subject site. A wetland and associated buffer are located on the lot to the north, but neither the wetland nor the buffer extends onto the subject site. The proposed building meets the setback requirements of FWCC Section 22-826, including 50- foot front yard setback and 20-foot side and rear yard setbacks. No maximum lot coverage is established. 6. Drainage components of the project conform to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City amendments. 7. Street frontage improvements around the perimeter of the site have already been completed. Additional improvements are not required. The parking requirement for the proposed use in the OP-1 zone is one stall for every 300 square feet of gross floor area, or 202 parking stalls for 60,480 square feet of building area. The applicant has submitted a parking study indicating that 225 parking stalls are necessary to meet the parking demand anticipated for the building's projected tenants. Staff concurs with the findings of the parking study. Pursuant to FWCC 22-1398(2), the request to increase total parking stalls by 23 is approved. 9. Maximum building height for the proposed use in the OP zone is 35 feet. The approved elevations indicate the buildings will be under the maximum allowable building height. The mechanical screening units are within the allowed height exception for such equipment and are appropriately screened. 10. The trash enclosure meets code requirements in that it is screened with a solid enclosure made of materials that match the buildings. Additionally, landscaping is provided around the enclosure. 11. Site and architectural design is consistent with applicable code provisions and the criteria of the CZA. Pursuant to the applicable code, the project must "embody good design principles that will result in high quality development on the subject property". The site and buildings are not required to meet the requirements of the community design guidelines; however, the project incorporates good design principles by meeting a number of provisions from current code in the following ways. Site Design: a. FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(1) states primary building entrances should be visible from the right-of-way. The entrances of both buildings are oriented directly towards the right-of-way (Weyerhaeuser Way South). b. The entrance to both buildings is connected to the public sidewalk by a separate paved route delineated by stained, jointed concrete paving as called for in FWCC Section 22- 1634(d)(2). Paved pedestrian routes are provided between buildings [reference FWCC 22-1634(d)(4)]. C. A paved pedestrian connection is provided to the property line with the vacant property to the northwest (site of future office development — lot Q. Building Design: • All four buildings provide foundation landscaping of varying widths on all sides of each building [reference FWCC 22-1635(b)(2)]. Findings for Project Approval File No: 05-103587-00-UP/Doc. La 36172 East Campus Terrace Lot G Page 2 • Each building includes a canopy over the entrance [reference FWCC 22-1635(b)(3)]. + Each building incorporates an extra -tall, articulated cornice into the front elevation over the entrance area [reference FWCC 22-1635(c)]. • Storefront glazing, pedestrian lighting, and reveals are utilized to break up blank walls [reference FWCC 22-1635(c)]. • A large, paved pedestrian plaza is located at the east entrance between the two buildings. Bicycle racks, seating, and trash receptacles are provided in this area. [reference FWCC 22-1635(4)]. Landscaping is located on the periphery of the plaza to soften the overall appearance. • Each building incorporates changes in color and materials [reference FWCC 22- 1635(c)]. ■ Extruded brick veneer panels are located at building corners and along frontages. • The buildings are not modulated because the CZA specifically states that modulation of buildings shall not be required. The proposed site layout and building design embodies good design principles and results in a high quality of development. 12. FWCC Section 22-1566(h) calls for five feet of Type III landscaping along the north and south property lines, and ten feet of Type III landscaping along the east and west property line. The approved Binding Site Plan (BSP) requires that the first 25 feet adjacent to the right-of-way be improved as the "streetscape area". This applies to the east property line. Because there is an access easement running along the west property line, ten feet of Type III landscaping is required, rather than the typical five feet. The applicant has requested a landscape modification to allow this landscaping to be located within the easement area rather than shifted to the east edge of the easement. The existence of the un-utilized access easement along the west property line represents a unique circumstance. The easement in question was put in place in anticipation of an internal road providing access to lots within the BSP. The applicant and the other beneficiaries of the access easement have mutually agreed to utilize alternative access points to the subject lots, although the easement is still needed for utility purposes. Furthermore, the easement in question would be difficult to utilize for vehicular access, given the current development plans and grade differences along its length from north to south. The modification will result in a superior alternative than strict compliance with the provisions of the code. If the code is followed strictly, a 15-foot strip along the west side of the site will remain permanently unimproved. The modification will allow this area to be landscaped with groundcover, shrubs and trees. The applicant proposes to install 15 feet of landscaping rather than 10 feet, as code would typically require. Additionally, this allows the applicant to locate a 14-foot-wide landscaping area in the center of the west parking lot (rather than the typical eight -foot buffer between two rows of head -to -head parking areas). Given that the access easement along the west side of the site will not be utilized, this is a preferable configuration of landscaping within the available space. The applicant's request to modify landscaping requirements is consistent with FWCC Section 22- 1570 because it is necessary to comply with unique circumstances and because granting the modification results in a superior result than strict compliance with the requirements of the chapter. Findings for Project Approval File No: 05-103587-00-UP/no, I.D. 36172 East Campus Terrace Lot G Page 3 The approved landscape plan resubmitted October 25, 2006, shows landscaping meeting City and BSP requirements along all property lines. Per code, 4,750 square feet of Type IV landscaping is required within the parking lot. The applicant proposes 7,161 square feet. Landscaping islands are located at the end of all parking rows. Trees are located within landscape islands as required by code. 13. Nine significant trees exist on site. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(c)(1)(a), 25 percent (three trees) of the total must be retained or replaced. The applicant proposes to retain one significant tree and plant two replacement trees. Each of the replacement plantings will be 12 feet tall at time of planting. 14. The applicant proposes a retaining wall, which is up to nine feet in height along the south property line and a wall of up to 6.5 feet in height along the north property line. Boston Ivy plantings are proposed to be planted along both walls to mitigate visual impacts. 15. The pedestrian connection with Lot C to the northwest shall be completed in coordination with development of Lot C. If Lot C development lags behind development of the subject property, the owner of the subject property shall coordinate with the Lot C owner to complete the connection at such time as Lot C site improvements are made. 16. The access easement crossing the northeast corner of the site, providing access to Lot M shall be removed prior to approval of a building permit for Building A. 17. The proposed site plan application, elevations drawings, landscaping plan, and attachments have been determined to be consistent with the FWCP, with all applicable provisions of the FWCC, the CZA, and with the public health, safety, and welfare. Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations and other applicable City requirements. This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Isaac Conlen, Senior Planner Date: May 3, 2006 Findings for Project Approval File No: 05-103587-00-UP/no.. I.D. 36172 East Campus Terrace Lot G Page 4 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan Federal Way File No. SEP98-0039 NOTE: The purpose of this Final Staff Evaluation is to provide technical staff evaluation of the proposed action, supplement information contained in the environmental checklist and expanded studies, provide technical information unavailable to the applicant, correct inaccurate information, and recommend measures to the responsible official to mitigate identified environmental impacts. Technical reports and attachments referenced herein and in the environmental checklist may not be attached to all copies of this evaluation. Copies of reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting the Department of Community Development Services, 33530 First Way South, Federal Way, Washington, 98003. Phone: (253) 664-4000. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The subject property is located at South 3 20th Street, between 3 2 nd Drive South (Weyerhaeuser Way) and 1-5, and is comprised of approximately 65 acres (see attached vicinity map). The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 15 large lots and three tracts. The lots, varying in size from approximately 2.55 to 3.73 acres, will be sold and developed as part of a commercial development (see attached site plan). An existing 12" natural gas distribution line traverses the property, from north to south. As part of this project, it will be relocated to align with the internal access road and to avoid sensitive Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 1 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP areas and potential building pads. The new gas line will reconnect to the existing line just to the north of the south property line. The new line will also be upgraded such that it can be used as a transmission line, as needed, throughout the year. As each individual lot or group of lots is developed, associated potential impacts of each development project will be reviewed for conformity with this SEPA evaluation and for overall compliance with SEPA. LIST OF TECHNICAL REPORTS The following technical information was submitted as part of the development application: Binding Site Plan, Prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers, September 8, 1998. SEPA Checklist, prepared by the Quadrant Corporation, September 16, 1998. Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by The Transpo Group, September 1, 1998. Level 1 Downstream Analysis, prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers, June 17, 1998. Geotechnical Engineering Study, Prepared by Geotech Consultants, Inc., July 10, 1998. Wetland Delineation and Study Report, prepared by Talasaea Consultants, Sept. 14, 1998. Landscape Plan, prepared by The Roper Company, September 5, 1998. Topography Map with Significant Tree Sample, prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers, L.L.C., February 26, 1997. Significant Tree Analysis & Estimation, prepared by David R. Ringlee, Weyerhauser, November 25, 1998. ATTACHMENTS • Vicinity Map Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 2 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan (Reduced Scale) • SEPA Checklist • Table 1: Pro -rats Share Contribution Details GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan Applicant: Rick Libsack Quadrant Corporation PO Box 130 Bellevue, WA 98009 Location: South of South 320th Street, between 1-5 and Weyerhaeuser Way; in the Northwest quarter of Section 15 and the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M. Zoning: Office Park-1 (OP-1), subject to the terms of the August 23, 1994, Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Zoning Agreement. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Office Park ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Following are staff responses to the elements of the environmental checklist (enclosed) indicating whether or not city staff concurs with the applicant's response to the checklist Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 3 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP item, or staff clarification or amendment of the response. A. BACKGROUND Concur with the checklist. In addition, it should be noted that the development of the site will be subject to the terms of the August 23, 1994, Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Zoning Agreement (CPZA), Exhibit D (Office Park Zone OP-0. The site totals approximately 65 acres, of which approximately 42 will be developed for building sites, on 15 lots of approximately equal size. There are also three tracts, containing wetlands, a steep slope, two stormwater detention ponds, and open space, which will be dedicated to the city. The applicant (Quadrant) proposes that the project will accommodate finished lot sales as well as build -to -suit or for -lease office space, retail space, and a hotel, similar to other suburban office parks in the area. The average lot size is approximately three acres. Quadrant anticipates that the site will be fully built -out within five to seven years of the start of construction. At full build -out, an estimated 2,700 people will be employed on the site, in approximatel 700,000�squa�refeet�of oss floor area This environmental review covers the Binding Site Plan approval process, and associated utility and road improvement construction. Individual lot development will be subject to environmental review at the project stage. Impacts related to full build -out, including traffic and stormwater management, were reviewed under this SEPA evaluation. As each individual lot or group of lots is developed, associated potential impacts of each development project will be reviewed for conformity with this SEPA evaluation and subsequent Threshold Environmental Determination: Each individual development project will also be reviewed for overall compliance with SEPA. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Final Staff Evaluation /SEP9 8 -003 9 Page 4 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP 1. Earth a. Concur with the checklist. The site is rolling, but there is a slight ridge on the site. The ridge extends through the western portion at an elevation of 460 to 480 feet, the higher elevation being to the north. The site generally slopes gently to moderately east and west of the ridge. Numerous wetlands (see the site plan) are scattered throughout the site. b. Concur with the checklist. The steepest slope on the site is approximately 40 percent. This slope is located in the westerly portion of the site, at the eastern edge of Tract A. Tract A, which contains the majority of the steep slope and a large wetland, will be preserved as open space. Two lots adjacent to Tract A (Lots A & E) have a portion of the steep slope, and/or buffer, located along their western boundaries. The applicant proposes to cover these areas, outside of Tract A, within a 40 percent slope easement. The purpose of these slope easements is to put future purchasers on notice of the existence of the steep slope areas, and to prevent building on these areas contrary to the provisions in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC). These slopes fit within the FWCC definition of a steep slope hazard area because they have slopes of 40 percent or greater, and have a vertical relief of ten or more feet (FWCC Section 22-1). Any work which occurs within 25 feet of a steep slope hazard area is subject to review by the city under the Geologically Hazardous Areas Development provisions contained within Article XIV (FWCC Section 22-1286). No construction, utilities, or roads are proposed for these steep slope and setback areas, at this time. Any grading and/or construction within the steep slope or buffer areas associated with the individual lot development will be Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 5 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP reviewed at the individual project and environmental review stage, based on FWCC provisions. No further mitigation measures are necessary. c. Concur with the checklist. The soil classification for the majority of the site is Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 0-6 percent slope (AgB). Soil within the wetland located in the western portion of the site is classified as Orcas Peat (Or). The remaining soils surrounding this wetland are classified as Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam, 6-15 percent slope (AgC) and Arents, Alderwood Material, 6-15 percent slope (AmC). These soils, except for the peat, typically consist of a surficial zone (0-3 feet) of loose to medium - dense, weathered soils comprised of silty sand with gravel, and an underlying layer of consolidated glacial till. Permeability of the upper layer is variable, depending upon compaction. The lower layer is very slowly permeable. d. Concur with the checklist. The site is not within an identified Landslide Hazard Area, as shown on the City of Federal Sensitive Areas Map. e. Concur with the checklist. At full build -out, the approximate cut and fill volumes are estimated to be 159,000 and 87,000 cubic yards, respectively. The applicant proposes to balance the earthwork onsite. Initial grading will occur during the construction of the internal road system, frontage improvements, and stormwater detention pond, associated with this binding site plan. There will be 70,000 cubic yards of cut and 5,000 cubic yards of fill associated with these improvements, at this time. The subdivision code limits clearing and grading on the binding site plan to roads and utilities, unless specifically authorized as part of the approval process. Clearing and grading on each individual lot will be reviewed in association with the project development application. Off -site hauling and disposal of spoil material, Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 6 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP during individual lot construction, will be subject to project level environmental review. Future cut and fill volumes, and the potential for adverse impacts, associated with individual lot development will be reviewed at the project stage. f. Concur with the checklist.. The applicant must submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) Plan consistent with provisions of the FWCC to prevent and/or minimize erosion impacts during the construction phase of the project. Post construction erosion potential will be minimized by applicant's proposed stormwater drainage plan contained within the submitted Storm Drainage Calculations. Compliance with code provisions will prevent and/or minimize erosion impacts, thus no additional mitigation measures are necessary. g. Concur with the checklist. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-826, there is no maximum lot coverage for the proposed use in this zone. Buildable area is determined by other site development requirements (e.g., required buffers and building setbacks, parking lot landscaping, and surface water facilities) The applicant estimates that approximately 50 percent of the over all site will be covered with impervious surfaces; with approximately 70 percent of the individual developed lots covered with impervious surfaces. h. Concur with the checklist. A TESC plan must be approved and implemented in accordance with the city's engineering standards, in conjunction with filling and grading activities. Land surface modifications are regulated by FWCC Chapter 22 and the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). 2. Air a. Concur with the checklist. Short term effects to air quality will occur during Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 7 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP construction and paving operations. Construction activity contributes to carbon monoxide levels through the operation of construction machinery, delivery equipment and materials, and worker access to the site by automobile. These activities also include the emissions of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen, potentially elevating the level of photochemical oxidants, such as ozone, in the ambient air. Long term impacts, due to vehicle and maintenance equipment, such as lawn - mowers, and emissions from employees' and guests' vehicles will vary in level according to the amount of traffic generated in the future by the proposal. b. Concur with the checklist. The site is bordered to the north by South 320th Street, to the west by Interstate No. 5, and to the east by Weyerhaeuser Way, significant sources of vehicle emissions, which may affect the proposal, depending upon traffic volume and flow. c. Concur with the checklist. Compliance with local, state, and federal air quality standards provides sufficient mitigation of these potential impacts. In addition, the applicant's proposed landscaping will provide filtering of suspended particulates. Finally, the applicant proposes to water the site during construction phase to reduce the creation of dust. 3. Water a. Surface 1-3)Concur with the checklist. There are seven wetlands identified, delineated, and located on the site. A Wetland Delineation and Study report was prepared by Talasaea Consultants as part of this application. Pursuant to the terms of the August 23, 1994, Weyerhaeuser Company CPZA: Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 8 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP The development of wetlands is exempt from regulation under the provisions of Section 22, Article X1V (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) if the wetlands are individually smaller than 2,500 square feet and/or cumulatively smaller than 10,000 square feet in size in any 20-acre section of this property. (Exhibit D, Sec. VI.F.3 ) The site is divided into three sections of approximately 20 acres, in accordance with the CPZA, divided roughly along drainage basin boundaries. Section A comprises the westerly third of the site and contains approximately 23.90 acres. Within this section there is one wetland, Wetland A, of approximately 4.72 acres. No construction or other intrusion into the wetland and/or the 100 foot buffer is proposed for this section. The westerly half of this section will remain undeveloped in a dedicated open space tract, except for a stormwater detention pond, which will be located immediately outside of the 100 foot wetland buffer, to the southeast of the wetland. Section B, which is the north half of the easterly two-thirds of the site, contains approximately 20.08 acres. There are two wetlands located within this section: Wetland C, which is 560 square feet, and Wetland D, which is 0.51 acres and which functions at low to moderate levels. Wetland C will be filled, as will 9.589 square feet of Wetland D. Pursuant to the provisions of the CPZA, Wetland C, at 560 square feet, is below the 2,500 square foot minimum size for regulation and protection under the FWCC. Impacts to Wetland D are also exempt. because the amount impacted does not meet the 10,000 square foot threshold allowed to be displaced in any 20 acre section, by the CPZA. Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 9 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP Pursuant to the CPZA, Exhibit D, Sec. VI. E., wetland setbacks may be reduced to 50 feet, based on the quality and character of the particular wetland. A 50-foot buffer of dense native existing vegetation is proposed for the preserved portion of Wetland D, consistent with the CPZA. Future right-of-way dedication and frontage improvements along South 3 20th Street, may impact Wetland D, and the cumulative area impacted may rise above the 10,000 square foot threshold. Thus, any future intrusions may be subject to regulation under the code, within this 20 acre section. Section C, which is the south half of the easterly two-thirds of the site, contains approximately 21.01 acres. There are four wetlands located within this section: Wetland B, which is 2,550 square feet; Wetland E, of which 4,410 square feet is located on site; Wetland F, which is 1,050 square feet; and Wetland G, which is 1,450 square feet. All function at low to moderate levels. No construction intrusions are proposed for Wetlands G and E and thus they will not be impacted, except as noted below under stormwater runoff. The applicant also proposes a 50-foot buffer of dense vegetation for Wetlands E and G, consistent with Exhibit D, Sec. VI. E., of the CPZA. Wetlands B and F will be filled; Wetland F during the construction of a stormwater detention pond. Wetland F is exempt from the provisions of the CPZA and thus regulation under the FWCC, because at 1,050 square feet, it is less than the requisite 2,500 square feet. Impacts to Wetland B are also exempt because the amount impacted does not meet the 10,000 square foot threshold. While Wetland B is exempt from regulation, it does serve as groundwater support and stormwater control, Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 10 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP based on its rating in the supplied wetland report. It is also located in the southeast corner of a proposed lot, at the intersection of the proposed access road and Weyerhaeuser Way, a location where it could be retained as an attractive feature of the development. The applicant is encouraged to retain this wetland as a unique feature of the site. Of the wetlands, Wetland A merits special consideration because of its extensive peat soils, uncommon plant communities, and bog vegetation such as Labrador tea. This wetland abuts the 1-5 right-of-way, and is one of the more unique and higher functioning wetlands in the project vicinity. Although adjacent to the highway, this wetland has significant wildlife habitat value that is increased by the dense forested buffer along its eastern side, and the presence of permanently saturated soils. The wetland may also provide base flow support and alleviate flooding within the Hylebos Creek basin. 4-6) Concur with the checklist. b. Ground 1-2)Concur with the checklist. There are no proposed groundwater withdrawals or discharges. The applicant proposes to tie into the city sanitary sewer system, to be constructed. c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Concur with the checklist. Storm drainage facilities are required to be designed in accordance with all Core and Special Requirements outlined Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 11 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP in the KCSWDM, as well as applicable recommendations of the Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Basin Plan. A June 17, 1998, Leve/ 1 Drainage Analysis has been prepared by ESM Consulting Engineers. The existing surface water runoff from the site is divided between two basins, separated by the north/south ridge in the westerly portion of the site. The west basin is approximately 2 7.4 acres, and flows into Wetland A (Wetland No. 5, King County Inventory). The east basin flows easterly, towards North Lake and King County Inventoried Wetland No. 7. Water from the proposed stormwater detention pond located in the southwestern portion of the site will be discharged into the buffer area surrounding Wetland A. This wetland is a peat wetland. Peat wetlands are highly sensitive to changes in hydroperiod and changes in water chemistry. Stormwater chemistry is usually very different from peatland soil water chemistry. Even if the hydroperiod of Wetland A is maintained, changes in water quality could destroy the peat soils and thus the function and natural communities within Wetland A (November 12, 1998, Review of Proposed Development, by Adolfson Assoc., Inc.). Based on these facts, there exists the potential for adverse impacts to Wetland A as a result of this proposal. Tract C contains the main Stormwater Detention Pond, which then discharges into an adjacent non-exempt wetland. This stormwater discharge into Wetland G is subject to regulation under the FWCC, and may be subject to review at public hearing with the City of Federal Way Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 12 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP Hearing Examiner. Stormwater intrusions into wetlands/wetland buffers which differ in quantity, quality, and/or character from that naturally occurring necessitate review and regulation under FWCC Section 22- 1358. The applicant proposes to design the outlet pipes with energy dissipaters at the outlets to minimize possible impacts to the adjacent wetlands (A & G). Also, staff gauges, crest gauges, and shallow groundwater monitor wells will be installed. The composition and health of the plant community and a subjective assessment of the water quality within each sample location will also be documented at the time of installation. Monitoring of the hydrology is proposed on a bi-monthly basis throughout the development of the site. Finally, the applicant has proposed that: Although the project will be designed to replicate existing surface water drainage conditions into the preserved wetlands, some hydroperiod fluctuation is possible following construction. if the water level fluctuation within the wetland causes a loss of wetland functions, then mitigation measures will be implemented. All mitigation would be conducted as per the requirements of Section 22-1358(e)(1) of the City of Federal Way Code. (January 21, 1999, Talasea Consultants Letter) As the stormwater system is currently designed, no adverse impacts are anticipated. If, however, once construction begins and it appears that based on the wetland monitoring the discharge characteristics and quality are different than pre -development runoff, mitigation measures Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 13 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP will be required, pursuant to the FWCC provisions. Policies and goals adopted by the City of Federal Way as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions which are applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project include the following: To preserve the City's natural systems in order to protect public health, safety, and welfare, and to maintain the integrity of the natural environment. (Natural Environment Goal 1 [NEG1], City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan [FWCP]) Preserve and restore ecological functions, and enhance natural beauty, by encouraging community development patterns and site planning that maintains and compliments natural land forms. (N E G 2 , FWCP) The City will protect its wetlands with an objective of no overall net - loss of functions or values. (Natural Environment Policy 32 [NEP32], FWCP) The City will protect wetlands by maximizing infiltration opportunities and promoting the conservation of forest cover and native vegetation. (NEP42, FWCP) Based on the above policies, plans, and recommendations, the following mitigation measure should be required to minimize identified, potential significant adverse wetland impacts: Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 14 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP 1. Prior to approval of the binding site plan, the applicant must submit a detailed stormwater and wetland monitoring plan specifically for Wetlands A and G, respectively, which addresses the potential adverse stormwater impacts. Baseline data must also be collected on each wetland prior to any clearing or grading of the site. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director in association with the Department of Community Development Services. Note that a drainage release to the City of Federal Way will be required to allow drainage from the public streets to enter the private site. Any other potential stormwater impacts will be adequately mitigated by compliance with the requirements of all applicable city, state, and federal regulations. 2) Concur with the checklist. As with all paved, developed areas, the site will contribute some pollutants to ground and surface waters, as these will be washed off the site by stormwater into the drainage system. Pollutants which accumulate on paved surfaces may include heavy metals, petrochemicals, and other substances. Prior to construction of any improvements and/or buildings on the site, those portions of the drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the control of surface and stormwater runoff discharging from the site must be constructed and in operation in accordance with all city requirements. See also c.1, above. d. Concur with the checklist. Compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations will ensure that surface water impacts are appropriately mitigated. No further mitigation measures are necessary, except as specified Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 15 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP in c.1, above. 4. Plants a-d)Concur with the checklist. An approved landscape plan in accordance with FWCC Article XVII is required for this project. There are approximately 1,024 significant trees located on the site, based on the assessment by David R. Ringlee, of Weyerhaeuser. A significant tree is defined in the FWCC as a tree which is in good health, not detrimental to the community, and at least 12" in diameter 4.5' above the ground, not including Red Alder, Cottonwood, Poplar, or Big -leaf maple. Large numbers of significant trees and native vegetation will be retained within the dedicated tracts and wetland buffers. Significant trees located within proposed rights -of -way or utility corridors are not be counted towards the total which must be retained in compliance with FWCC Section 22-1568. Under the current proposal, only the access road and utility infrastructure will be constructed. As each individual lot is graded and developed, specific impacts to the biotic community will be assessed and any necessary mitigation measures will be imposed at the project level. Pursuant to the provisions of the FWCC Section 22-1568, at least 25 percent of the significant trees on each individual parcel must be retained or replaced. 5. Animals a-d)Concur with the checklist. Installation of landscaping, preservation of wetlands and associated buffers, open space, and retention of significant trees throughout the site will protect and preserve habitat opportunities. The associated stormwater detention/retention ponds may also enhance habitat opportunities, particularly for resident and migrating waterfowl. The site is Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 16 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP located within the Pacific Flyway, a significant route for migratory waterfowl. Bald Eagles have been observed in the greater East Campus area, but there is no evidence that there are any identified nesting and/or perching trees located on the subject site. As the overall site is developed, potential impacts to the associated ecosystems will be addressed at the project development level for each individual lot. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a-c)Concur with the checklist. 7. Environmental Health a. Environmental Health Hazards 1-2)Concur with the checklist. Normal emergency services are anticipated. The overall site has access to two major roads, South 320th Street and 32nd Drive South (Weyerhaeuser Way), and the proposed internal access road, suitable for emergency vehicle access, and there will be two points of entry for the interior lots. The individual lot development plans will be reviewed by fire and police personnel for adequacy of emergency access and layout at the project development level for each individual lot. No further mitigation measures are necessary at this point. b. Noise 1-3)Concur with the checklist. Noise levels will increase on a potentially long-term basis as construction activity is expected to take place over a five to seven year period. Control measures include required Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 17 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP conformance with local noise ordinances regulating hours of construction. An increase in noise levels due to traffic generated by development projects within the binding site plan area is expected on a long term basis. The majority of noise will be generated by vehicle traffic and will occur during the major commuter times, during the week. Compliance with the FWCC and implementation of the measures outlined in the checklist will sufficiently mitigate noise levels. Additionally, proposed landscaping along site perimeters and internal parking lot landscaping will help buffer noise levels. No further mitigation measures are necessary at this point. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a-1) Concur with the checklist. The majority of the subject site is undeveloped and forested. However, there are numerous trails and old roads on the property, particularly an old paved road that extends north/south through the middle of the site. Some utility lines are located under this road. There are several small, developed portions on the site: a fenced, graveled storage area on the northwest portion of the site and a Puget Power substation near the intersection of South 320th Street and Weyerhaeuser Way. The site is bounded to the east by Weyerhaeuser Way. The land east of Weyerhaeuser Way is currently undeveloped, but may be developed by the applicant with a similar type project in the future. The Weyerhaeuser campus is situated to the south of the site and 1-5 is to the west. South 320th Street runs along the north boundary of the site. Across South 320th Street, Quadrant Corporation is proposing an 80 unit (approximate) residential development, being reviewed under a separate application. There are identified sensitive areas located on the site (i.e., steep slopes and wetlands). The potential for adverse impacts and any necessary mitigation Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 18 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP measures are discussed in the relevant sections of this evaluation. The applicant estimates that approximately 2,670 people will work in the completed project, at full build -out. A portion of the site may contain a hotel, with approximately one hundred rooms, which will add a transitory residential population 9. Housing a-c)Concur with the checklist. The majority of the site is undeveloped and there are no existing housing units on the subject property. No housing units will be eliminated by this project and only temporary, hotel type housing may be provided. 10. Aesthetics a-c)Concur with the checklist. No views in the immediate vicinity will be obstructed, however views onto the site will changed from a substantially undeveloped, forested site to an office park type development, at full build - out. The western 11.72 acres will be preserved as open space, in a dedicated tract. This area encompasses Wetland A, a unique peat wetland, and its associated buffer. Other stormwater detention pond tracts also provide additional open space areas. Significant tree retention will be reviewed as each individual lot is developed, at the project level. The applicant intends to retain as many significant trees as possible. However, at least 25 percent of the significant trees contained on the parcel must be retained or replaced, pursuant to the provisions of FWCC Section 22-1568. Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 19 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP 11. Light and Glare a-c)Concur with the checklist. FWCC Section 22-950 and 22-954 prohibit lighting levels from spilling over onto adjacent properties. The applicant has stated in the checklist that lighting for parking areas, buildings, and driveways will be glare control downlight fixtures, to prevent direct lighting past the property line. Individual site development applications will be subject to environmental review, and reviewed for compliance with the FWCC. No further mitigation measures are necessary. 12. Recreation a-c)Concur with the checklist. The North Lake Fishing Access and Steel Lake Park are located within 0.50 miles of the site. There are also privately maintained pedestrian trails located on the Weyerhaeuser Campus, south of the project site. Additionally, approximately 11.72 acres of the site will be retained as an undisturbed wildlife and vegetation zone, providing opportunities for wildlife viewing. Bicycle lane and pedestrian paths are proposed for Weyerhaeuser Way South and South 320th Street. The internal roadway will have sidewalks. These will connect to existing and proposed paths. The city will be working with the applicant to ensure connectivity to these existing facilities, and the privately maintained pedestrian trails located on the Weyerhaeuser Campus. 13. -Historic and Cultural Preservation a-c)Concur with the checklist. Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 20 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP 14. Transportation a—g) Concur with the checklist. A September 1, 1998, Traffic impact Analysis (TIA), by The Transpo Group, was prepared for the project to identify traffic impacts and recommend mitigation measures associated with the development. City traffic analysts accept the traffic analysis as follows. The City of Federal Way has identified 18 Transportation Improvement P/an (TIP) projects in which the proposed development will exceed a 10 PM Peak Hour Trip threshold. Projects are identified for mitigation when the proposed development's trip generation exceeds the net PM peak threshold of ten trips entering the street improvement project. Note that internal and external road frontages must be improved to the City of Federal Way standards, pursuant to the provisions of the FWCC. Pro-rata share mitigative fees are based on the ratio of net project generated trips to total trips multiplied by the TIP project cost. The city must refund collected fees if not used for the identified projects within six years. The following road improvement projects will be impacted by site -generated peak hour trips and will require pro-rata mitigation. TIP Project PM Peak Hour Trips Project Generated S 3201h St & SR 99 — Add Turn Lanes 167 S 3361h St: 13`h to 181h Ave S — Widen to 4/5 lanes 56 Military Rd @ S 3041h St — Add Turn Lanes 100 Military Rd @ S Star Lake Rd — Signalization & Add Turn Lanes 11 SR 99: S 312'h to S 3241h St — Add HOV Lanes 22 Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 21 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP 23`d Ave S: S 317`h to S 3241h St — Widen to 5 Lanes 80 SR 99 @ S 3301h St — Signalization & Left Turn Lane 11 S 2881h St @ SR 99 — Add Left Turn Lanes 11 S 3121h St @ 141h Ave S — Signalization 11 SR 99: S 3241h St to S 3401h St — Construct HOV Lanes 15 S 336th St @ Weyerhaeuser Way — Realign Intersection S 3201h St @ 15' Ave S — Add Two Left Turn Lanes (northbound & westbound) 220 112 SR 99: S 2481h St to SR 509 — Construct HOV Lanes 11 S 3561h St: 1s' Ave S to SR 99 — Widen to 5 Lanes 11 178 S 320th St @ 20th Ave S — Add Northbound Right Turn Lane and Second Westbound Left Turn Lane S 320th St @ 23`d Ave S — Add Second Left Turn Lane on S 3 20`h 338 S 348h St: 9`h Ave to SR 99 — Add HOV Lanes and Eastbound Right Turn Lane at SR 99 11 SW 3121h St: Vt Ave S to SR 509 — Widen to 3 Lanes 13 As a result of the potential adverse traffic impacts resulting from the proposed development, identified by the applicant's TIA, and concurred with by the city, the developer may construct the proposed TIP projects or contribute pro-rata mitigation fees. South 320th Street is classified as a medium/high accident corridor. The applicant is proposing that the central access road enter and exit onto South 320th Street, within this medium/high accident corridor. At full build -out, this proposal will generate approximately 9,120 net, new vehicle trips. This estimation is based on the September 1, 1998, TIA prepared by The Transpo Group, in conjunction with this application. This increase in vehicle trips will have a significant adverse impact on the accident corridor. In order to Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 22 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP provide opportunities for vehicles to enter and exit the project site, without increasing the accident rate, signalization and new turn lanes for the new intersection is necessary. Also, based on public safety concerns similar to those stated above, turn bays are necessary on the southerly access road and Weyerhaeuser Way. These turn bays were identified in the TIA and are concurred with by city staff. Policies and goals adopted by the City of Federal Way as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition or deny proposed actions which are applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project include the following: Provide a safe, efficient, convenient and economic street system with sufficient capacity to move people, goods and services at an appropriate level of service. The City shall develop and adopt policies for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance and preservation of new and existing facilities, such as gravel and substandard streets. (Transportation Goal 2 [TG2], FWCP) Identify and implement changes to the transportation system which reduce reliance on the single occupant vehicle. Support state, regional, and local visions and policies. (Transportation Policy 9 [TP9], FWCP) Protect existing and acquire future right-of-way consistent with functional classification cross section (transit, rail, bike, and pedestrian) needs. Require developments to dedicate full right-of-way as needed with subdivision development, or with over 50 percent redevelopment. (TP10, FWCP) Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 23 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP Establish a L OS standard based on planning methodology using vehicle miles traveled (VMT) congested to measure the Level of Service (L OS) citywide, and an operation methodology for development impact, mitigation corridors and intersections based on L OS = v/c less than or equal to 0.9. (TP16, FWCP) Consider safety first in the design of intersection improvements. (TP24, FWCP) Structure the City's improvement program to strategically place increments of public and private investment that complement the multimodal vision of the plan. This should include `matching" improvements to supplement the efforts by other agencies to provide HOV and transit facilities (TP3 2, FWCP) Arterial improvements will be constructed along key corridors to improve flow and encourage use of these more efficient modes. (TP41, FWCP) Ensure that City facilities and amenities are ADA compatible. (TP51, FWCP) Work to extend the existing system of sidewalks, bikeways, and equestrian ways in the City to provide access to public transit, neighborhood and business centers, parks, schools, public facilities and other recreational attractions. (TP 5 2, FWC P ) If allowed by applicable law, development inside and outside the City should be required to provide their fare share of onsite and offsite improvements. (HP7, FWCP) Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 24 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP Based on the above policies, plans, and recommendations, the following mitigation measures should be implemented to minimize identified potential significant adverse transportation impacts. 1. Prior to approval of the Binding Site Plan, the applicant must submit a detailed stormwater and wetland monitoring plan specifically for Wetlands A and G, respectively, which addresses the potential adverse stormwater impacts. Baseline data must also be collected on each wetland prior to any clearing or grading of the site. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director in association with the Department of Community Development Services. 2. Prior to recording of the Binding Site Plan, the applicant shall either construct the following impacted Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects, as required by the Public Works Director; or, contribute the project's pro-rata share of the construction cost of the -TIP projects, prior to issuance of building permits, as follows: TIP PROJECT PROJECT COST PRO-RATA SHARE COST S 320`h St & SR 99 $1,619,000 2.55% $41,300 S 336'h St: 13'h to 181h Ave S $693,500 2.85% $19,700 Military Rd @ S 3041h St $704,000 4.74% $33,400 Military Rd @ S Star Lake Rd $180,000 0.86% $1,500 SR 99: S 3121h to S 3241h St $9,150,000 $5,573,000 1.05% $96,300 23`d Ave S: S 3171h to S 3241h St 4.89% $272,400 Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 25 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP TIP PROJECT PROJECT COST PRO-RATA SHARE COST SR 99 @ S 330`h St $240,000 0.34% $800 S 2881h St @ SR 99 $1,115,300 0.24% $2,600 S 3121h St @ 14`h Ave S $180,000 0.52% $900 SR 99: S 3241h St to S 340`h S $11,672,000 0.49% $56,700 S 3361h St @ Weyerhaeuser Way $648,700 10.72% $69,500 S 3201h St @ 15` Ave S $1,739,000 2.25% $39,200 SR 99: S 2841h St to SR 509 $9,632,000 $7,205,000 0.68% $65,600 S 3561h St: 151 Ave S to SR 99 0.61% $44,200 S 320`h St @ 201h Ave S $1,358,000 4.23% $57,400 S 3201h St @ 23`d Ave S $3,900,000 5.16% $201,300 S 3481h St: 91h Ave to SR 99 $3,096,000 0.34% $10,400 SW 3121h St: 1s` Ave S to SR 509 $3,775,000 1.25% $47,200 TOTAL $1,060,400 3. Prior to occupancy of the first building, the applicant must install a traffic signal and install a 250-foot westbound left turn lane at the proposed north access to Parcel 1, at South 320th Street. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director. 4. Prior to occupancy of the first building, the applicant must construct public safety improvements in the form of a 100-foot southbound right turn bays, with taper, at the middle and south Parcel One access driveways on Weyerhaeuser Way. Right turn bays, "pockets," meet the Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 26 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP 1994 WSDOT guidelines for right turn treatment. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director. 5. Prior to occupancy of the first building, the applicant must construct public safety improvements in the form of a 150-foot northbound left turn bay, with taper, at the Parcel One south access driveway on Weyerhaeuser Way. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director. 6. Prior to occupancy of the first building, the applicant must construct public street improvements on the frontages of the existing rights -of -way, consistent with the roadway cross sections identified in the FWCP, as follows. On South 320th Street, the planned roadway section is five lanes plus HOV lanes and a planted median. On Weyerhaeuser Way South, the planned roadway section is three lanes, with a bike lane. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director. 15. Public Services a-b)Concur with the checklist. In addition, individual lot development will be reviewed, at the project level, for potential adverse impacts to public services 16. Utilities a-b)Concur with the checklist. Utilities will be constructed in a major spine along the internal roadway and subbed into the individual lots within the project. Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 27 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP The existing 12" natural gas distribution line will be relocated to align with the internal access road and to avoid sensitive areas and potential building pads. The new gas line will reconnect to the existing line just to the north of the south property line. This line will also be upgraded such that it can be used as a transmission line, as needed, throughout the year. CONCLUSION Based on staff analysis of the application, the completed SEPA checklist, consultant's reports, and applicable city and county regulations and policies, the proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, provided that the conditions are properly implemented pursuant to a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS). Conditions of the MDNS are based upon impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, exhibits, and supplemental reports as listed, and the above "Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Application' and are supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the city for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. Mitigation Measures Prior to approval of the Binding Site Plan, the applicant must submit a detailed stormwater and wetland monitoring plan specifically for Wetlands A and G, respectively, which addresses the potential adverse stormwater impacts. Baseline data must also be collected on each wetland prior to any clearing or grading of the site. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director in association with the Department of Community Development Services. Final Staff Evaluation/SEP98-0039 Page 28 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP 2. Prior to recording of the Binding Site Plan, the applicant shall either construct the identified Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects, as required by the Public Works Director; or, contribute the project's pro-rata share of the construction cost of the TIP projects, which totals $1,060,400, prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Prior to occupancy of the first building, the applicant must install a traffic signal and install a 250-foot westbound left turn lane at the proposed north access to Parcel 1, at South 320th Street. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director. 4. Prior to occupancy of the first building, the applicant must construct public safety improvements in the form of a 100-foot southbound right turn bays, with taper, at the middle and south Parcel One access driveways on Weyerhaeuser Way. Right turn bays, "pockets," meet the 1994 WSDOT guidelines for right turn treatment. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director. 5. Prior to occupancy of the first building, the applicant must construct public safety improvements in the form of a 150-foot northbound left turn bay, with taper, at the Parcel One south access driveway on Weyerhaeuser Way. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director. 6. Prior to occupancy of the first building, the applicant must construct public street improvements on the frontages of the existing rights -of -way, consistent with the roadway cross sections identified in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, as follows: on South 320th Street, the planned roadway section is five lanes plus HOV lanes and a planted median, and on Weyerhaeuser Way South, the planned roadway section is three lanes, with a bike lane. All plans, specifications, estimates, and supporting Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 29 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP documents must be approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Director. The city reserves the right to review any further revisions or alterations to the site or the proposal in order to determine the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the project at that point in time. Prepared by: David G. Graves Contract Associate Planner Madrona Planning & Development Services (206) 297-2106 e: February 3, 1999 dSYS\DOCUMENT\SEP98_00.39\STAFEVAL.DOC Final Staff Evaluation /SEP98-0039 Page 30 East Campus Parcel 1 BSP I Cd I r I i r A 4 1". I RESUBMITTED 4%LDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOV 1 6 2.018 33325 8`� Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 CITY OF 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way COCfTY OF FEDER4L WAY ww,v.ci affederaiwa .com MMUNITY CEVrL�?ME1JT RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION This completed form MUS T accompany all resubmittals. Additional or re vised plans or documents for an active project will not be accepted unless accompanied by this completed form. Changes to drawings must be clouded. Applicants will be required to affix the City'5 date stamp on each page of resubmitted plans and to collate loose plans into existing plan sets. You are encouraged to contact the Permit Center prior to submitting if you are not sure about the number of copies required. Project Number: - d 5 L-5— 6— - _J_ L -y -2 Project Name: 50/ r A� r CAofC Project Address: Project Contact: ,ar er�+� �ct� Phone: 3�3- 81�3-qy �d E-mail RESUBMITTED ITEMS: # of Copies Detailed Description of Item / LI gar eR + I a Resubmittal Requested by: Letter Dated: ��a em er) _ OFFICE USE ONL Y RESUB #.•.�— Distribution Date: I I "14`17 By.' �, Name # Descri Lion nDev % m Fire Other Bulletin # 129 — September 24, 2018 Page 1 of 2 k:\Handouts\Resubmittal Information O O O O O O O O 00 rn 00 rn 00 ON 00 a, 00 Q 00 00 a1 00 a1 k 3 o 00 N 3 3 N 00CD 3 3 3 3 3 CD 3 300 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 a���waQ W www �3aQ > > O w. A W W A Q Q Q O Q A A v] y+ k U w W coo On Cn W w Q w w w z W W o o Q E- F� x WC�' z A z w o C ° O OQ- M M M M CN N ] ] O p 0 O 0 N N a �—' O O O Cq N O N O N C14 L Ct. N O N Cr N N m a (3 — N Rrb N CN m M, clt CV en, MC4 — Q A Q z L �con 3 o W G. = Q 2 Q cn U v] U U -� U -a x U Caon r3 W O °zQo zw E- W >0H O¢ U o O r� a°. Z a v u25ri W '> > L33 > w p 'U 12 ozQQ3 U) =)�:) CIO Buz ✓ U3o z w w Q .� x w z ¢ v)vZzww��W¢ 3x�v33w �OU - a3.a vl N 0 No 0 O� 0 O 0 M 0 v) 0 0 E'`7 0 RRT O Ft O O N ON O O O O O 0 06 O O O O -It O � "O V') �D V ) �D Vl 1.0 Vl �O CD 00 O 00 O 00 O 00 00 It 00 J v 'l- �t -- N N N N N N N N N N N kkl T N M IT LO (0 r• 00 rn O T T T N T M T W o�t� C.0 w CD O NZ (n Z t� w U C] T 0 T Q) 0) cu d city of Federal Way City of 300Parcel NOV � 6 2018 September2018 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way Wa 98003 Federal Way Notification area (206)-835 C�OFFQEWAY www.cityoffederalway.com C'OMMUINF v D£'VELQPME I Fire Station --.S--U4Tff ST. ..._� - ..S-324fiH-ST N .a u o a z x C m CO r Legend King County Tax Parcels Subject Property Notified Properties S 323RD ST S 321ST ST S 325M ST w a S 325TH.PL S 326TH PL Scale: A� Federal Way N 0 140 280 Feet f I This map is intondod for use as a gtaphlea tepresentiQYn Wy. The City of Federal Way makes no -hy as to Its accwacy. O O O 00 v N H V] U rr M CL O C O (a U w 0 z I O O O O O O o O O O O o O O O O 0 O o O O O o O O O O o O O O O O Cl O o o O O O o o O O O O O O O O O O d a O O O O O O O O O O O O O L-)Umm nLnm�LOLOmmLO O O C?O o o O O O O O C?O mLnm mLoLnU-)Ln(nmm 0 w w m m 0 m m T m Cd m m T m T T CD m co m m m m C9 m m aD m LO LO Un m u� m u') U-)LoLo m m ,It 'IT It't� It It v v�� It It Lo Ln m Ln m Lo Lo u-)Lh Lo � v�'t� It� �t It Ln Z Cl) M crJ M M M M M M M M C? T M M M M M C? M C? M M M M M C ('7 u) V (D r m O r N Cm m m N N M co M O r N V CO M N m N M m N N N M M O M O M V O O N N M M M M M M V V O N O (O,� O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 O O V O O Cl) 7 V M V 7 V 7 7 V (o (D m (D (D to co co w CD (o co CD (D w w co '(D (D (D co (D co c0 co co (D Ln cD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co co co M M M M co co co co co M M co M co M co co co Cl) co M M M M co co O G] M LO (O r CO O r N 0) M M N _ N CD (D co O r N V co m N (fl Cl) d r r r N N N M M O M O M V r r r r r r r r r r O O N N M M M M M M 7 r r r r +- r r r r r r O r Oii CV T Ch L L p o a Cl) m a c D ca p o n o L CO C)o N L L O o r AV W O O O Or m CA > N �O L L L M O M pOj 00 O U) ' O L L (d LO O- �_ o O Q L > O > L L L Q � N V O O>> Cn A> ro o Q O (n 75 O Cl) p co Cl) 0'U) o N Q V) � M Q O z L a 0 do C, T (n L O U) CD UJ LO 0 o O LL O S co No O p L U) O C) O (n p v p O 7 O O C7) L U) o m O F, m _ LCl)_ N L O> Q M m o U L L L o co _ (� _ a) U) 1 N O L O Cn ro V) T N LL O Q Q m V) Q O r an T Co CTl > O > a) M C5) Q r O C O UJ D U) U) N L T cn UJ 06 Cl)_ N O > O Q — > r Q UJ > L = m a LL a U) co CO O — /�' v _ _ N O Q O m O CV C R a s m cM'7 0 Q .. ro0 ro0 65Cf) O a) r T L CC c6 U) p" N N O Cn � Co a Q� co m L LO L L Ir m m (.� �1 //N�� m U) o L to U) v 0 V L a) a) r L L M M LL @j LL L O M O N W r _C L Q d �- L L L U) UJ L N ¢ L L Q O i i CO YO ;-6 � rn> �i r (D O o0 N CO O T o (16 jp M cNo M 0, O=— LL LL o o O O O Lo Cn [n M N W V N >>M M LL CC M M N M M M > a co M A` W O. M � � 0 () 0 � UJ Co U) LL U) U) (7 U) N Cl) U) W (1) U) Cl) m UJ UJ U) N U) U3 N •4) M M Cl) Cl) co co (M Cl) M C`') M Cl) co co M co co co M M M co co (Y) Cl) Cl) M co Cl) (0 (Cl (0 O to (D (o (o c0 (O O to O O O (o O O co co (D (D (O w (D(D O (D O O (D` O O O O O O o o O O O O O o O O O O O O O O oO O o O O Cl) V O O O O O O O O o O O o O O CD CD O C) CD o O CD C) C)O CD 0 CD 0 C) CD 0 0 M ? W O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 (7 (D (7 (7 (7 O o 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 (7 (7 (7 0 0 0 G (D C7 C7 C7 C7 0 (7 (7 O m Li ti Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O .a a _0 a a a a a a a a a -o a a a a -p a -0 a a a a a a a a a a a. N �• x LU O a) m a a m O a7 a) a) m N O > > > > > > > > > > > > > a O m m m a O O O O O N > > > > > > > > > > > > -co () > 'm a) > O N > > w N W -F -(z co m m m m (u cq c6 (a c6 m c6 c6 c6 m m m c6 m m m (6 (6 co m LL c '0 co M co M M M M M M M M Cl) M N N N N N N N N N N N N CD O C)C y O O O O O o O O O O o O O m ro ro m m m ro ro ro ro m m m O O O O O o o O O O O O m m m ro m ro m m ro ro m m a O 9 O O N ,— r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 'T m m m C o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o (D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C) 0 C7 CJ LO m 0 CD 0 Lo LO O G 0 O 47 O In 0 CD C7 O CD O O 0 O O Oam O C pp C 0 0 0 LO (D N r CD LO LO r N 0 0 LO 7 LO N CO I- D] (D r cc M M V r LO C:) I- CD N O CD o o LO C) C) 0, O M C � LO oc O M " M (D cc r CD r CD C)�7 p o O q /� V i O -4 M r I- co A N M a0 r O LO Lo T n cD CD N o 7 Lf7 r l!7 LO O O 'R CD I C' E Cl) LO V r Cl) V 00 N M N N LO LO co r (o r N N co CV CO LOC Q rO (o N N r T �y V L a s= c c >= C C C C C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O D 9 -2 L L L L D L 9 111 (� — a a a a� a m m m a� m a a s IL LL al 'a in w (n in y in in in N ti w w ) ` i ` O ` i ` .U.. ` U) Cl) (n LL p p p p p p p 0 0 y m m ro (n m ro m m m ro m m y 07 CO M Z a` m __ y a LL li [L[L d a a_ a_ a_ d a d a� r r r p LLXk 3i X# Xk 7# �t �# �k Ykk LL C C C C C C C C C C C C LL LL 2 C a) m al m a) a) a) a) a) a) N N O C ro 00 J Q E E E 2 2 E 2 2 2 2 E E E 2 a a O U O ro ro m m m m m m m m m m roEL m 10 a n n F' °! a a ° a O O C1 C7 CJ C7 O C) C7 Ci C1 C7 rn rn C G C C C C C C C C C C C (� m e (d m (a Li m m E m U E E ro ro U U a (.� -O 'a a 'a 'O 'O 'a "C7 LV LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL r 'a C Q >>>> a C h d d d d d d d d d rZ d o a m Q C.r O❑8 (3 Cs C3 n ter=-- ---� Inco cv Lu ui W 16 QQ a) E C Cl Cl 7 N a ro a a� cc 3 co m 0 0 Q m al O7 Q 2 ca to ro ca LL 0 IL 0 0 7 N (OD N O 1j a) V3 LL L a 3 m xx a ro c? rIomoLnw m m w m rm-I chi chi r-I ri N Ln d •L O_ ri a -I Ol I� n n N n n O O 01 O O O O O O O O 01 O O O O O O N (N r-I N N N N N N 00 r0 0J } LL. O m ri W I:zr W 00 O O 00 W t0 CT N 00 ":T O V1 >1 V1 V) 6 t0 O O N O N 6 O 0) 00 N cn r-i ri r-i t 0) ri r-1 Z 0o V, U 00 C U J 01 O Lf ri O 0) J c-i N •C U � m J r0 �' O C E Ln 0 L C L C a YLn 40 U cE U tif r6 T 4 rp r0 cu > C 0 C tun C U 0) +, aj rj U Q v -i a ++ t1D L U c L %' C > _, M m +1 ++ +, +, +� +- U , W O c y r0 01 c C C C C C ++ +� r L1 3 m Q m41 U U U U U U N 0 O f- Ul Y r° U o H > i > > > > H F a C O M O W W O O 0 r-I 00 V) VI O ri 4cl- O . i O Ln j 0J O lLn Ol V1 ' ^ 0 L L ri 0 Ln V) V) V) = = VI VI VI V) > > > t > > > > Q Q Q L L Q Q Q Q Q L C i C 0J N C C C C C O_ �+ N m N m N m N m N m N m N m f0 Q N d ri in Ln (n 0) 00 I;t o LD H OJ , L O 0 N ri N N N N N ri O O ri O N o N 0 -Ln M M M M {nin Q m m m m m tio Ol O Q O W l7 00 m 01 CL LL N N LL H i LU cr O_ c c O r0 V) Ln 'L C D- -i d H O L L Vl 00 a 2 +, N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 3 , M IZ Q H V1 00 O N ri N m � m m ri m tD a -I N w 00 a N O D_ to O O O ri 0 O 0 0 0 r-I r-I o 0 O ri r-Iri i r V) t= 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m rn - o +� +� Z to In L � v O o 0 0 LA L � 4 In In In L � � In (� O U , m m w w w w w 00 00 00 00 w tD w tD to w tD w w r+ r-I -6 'p Q o� U v v v v v v v v ro - o +� E L V1 m m Ln V1 In VI In m m m m In m In V1 Ln In W d M D_ 00 rWn N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 31, 2018 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Building Official Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Jim Harris 253 835-2652 FOR DRC MTG. ON: November 15, 2018 - Completeness and Technical Review FILE NUMBER(s): 18-105080-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: SDA HISPANIC CHURCH PROJECT ADDRESS: 32115 WEYERHAEUSER WAY S ZONING DISTRICT: OP-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of a 1-story church building with 328 seat capacity. Site infrastructure is already completed but there will be upgrades to storm retention. LAND USE PERMITS. SEPA & Process III PROJECT CONTACT: BRENT LAMBETH BRENT LAMBETH, ARCHITECT LLC MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Preliminary Plan Set SEPA Checklist Storm Drainage TIR Title Report Trip Generation and Parking Assessment Transportation Management Plan Water and Sewer Availability El E3 nupw� Hnaon&&Fungo 9 Un@13 CONSULTING ENGINEERS/CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN OF SDA HISPANIC: CHU.RCH 32125 WEYERHAEUSER WAY SOUTH FEDERAL, WAY, WA FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON CONFERENCE OF SDA 32229 WEYERHAEUSER WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY, WA 98001 R.E.I. JOB NO. 16045 November 5, 2017 RECEIVED OCT 3 0 2018 CITY. OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1519 West Valley Highway North/Suite 101 Post Office Box 836/Auburn, WA 98071 Page 1 253-833-7776 Fax 253-939-2168 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN The project is to construct a 12,894-square foot Seventh Day Adventist (SDA) church building at 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South. The following table describes the anticipated daily use of the church facilities during the week. SDA church observes the Sabbath from Friday sunset to Saturday sunset. To keep the weekly Sabbath holy, Adventists abstain from secular work on Saturday. They will also usually refrain from purely secular forms of recreation, such as competitive sport and watching non -religious programs on television. However, nature walks, family -oriented activities, charitable work and other activities that are compassionate in nature are encouraged. The major weekly worship service occurs on Saturday. The following is the anticipated use of the church during the week PP in the chart is for People at the church during the hour of time. PK is the number of parking stalls used during the hour of time. SDA Church, Anticipated Daily Use Time days Tuesdays Wednesdays Thursdays I Fridays Saturda s Sunda PP PK PP PK PP I PK PP PK PP PK PP PK I PP I PK 6:00am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00am 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 75 45 30 20 10:00am 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 370 120 30 20 11:00am 9 -4 9 4 -9 4 9 4 9 4 370 -120 30 20 12:00noon 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 370 120 30 20 1:00 m 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 9 4 370 120 30 20 2:00 m 0 0 0 0 0 75 75 30 20 3:00 m 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 30 20 4:09pm 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 20 5:00 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 20 6:00 m 9 4 4 2 9 4 9 4 9 4 25 15 30 20 7:00 m 30 20 30 20 30 20 30 1 20 75 35 150 75 75 50 8:00 m 30 20 30 20 30 20 30 20 75 35 150 75 75 50 9.00 m 30 20 30 20 30 20 30 20 75 35 150 ?S 75 50 The parking at the site will follow the standards of The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation 41 Edition Land Use: 560 Church average study parking demand versus seat and gross floor area. The ITE ,average peak parking demands are as fhRows: ITE Average Peak Parking Demands for Churches AVERAGE PEAK PERIOD PARKING MEASURED PEAK PERIOD DEMAND AVERAGE SEATING 0.20 VEHICLES PER SEAT GROSS FLOOR AREA 8.37 VEHICLES PER 1,000 SF GFA Page 2 Using the Institute ofTransportation Engineers Parking Generation average peak period parking standard the minimum number of parking stalls required would be 82. A special event parking demand was determined using the International Building Code occupancy loads for the church using the same ITE average peak period seating standard of 0.2 vehicles per occupant/seat. Please see the parking requirement calculations on the following table: SDA ITE REQUIRED PARKING CALCULATIONS SPECIAL EVENT ITE BASED ON IBC SDA CHURCH AVERAGE REQUIRED OCCUPANCY MAXED ROOM NAME IBC CODE PEAK ITE PEAK OUT ITE AVE SPECIAL ROOM OCCUPANCY PERIOD PARKING AREA ILOAD DEMAND STALLS DEMAND PRK REQ. PLATFORM 0.2 USEABLE SPACE) 300 27 8.37 3 5 SANCTUARY 292, 0.2 58 0.2 58 MULTI -PURPOSE 0.2 ROOM 3218 214 8.37 27 42 KINDERGARTEN 410 21 8.37 3 0.2 4 JUNIORS 417 21 8.37 4 0.2 4 PRIMARY 410 21 8.37 3 1 0.2 4 BEGINNERS 410 21 8.37 3 0.2 4 TOTAL PARKING STALLS, REQUIRED 101 121 For the daily parking standard use of the site the SDA church is providingl 11 existing parking stall which will provide the required parking for peak Saturday worship service use. A special use event in which is above normal use of the building we have assumed to be the 508 IBC occupancy load capacity, would require 121 parking stalls. The stalls will be provided on the continuous lot G parcels 1 and 2 which has over a combined 223 existing parking stalls Page 3 HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC Transportation and Civil Engineering RECEIVED OCT 3 0 2018 CITY F FEDERAL WAy COMMUNi I Y DEVELOPMENT SDA FEDERAL WAY TRIP GENERATION & PARKING ASSESSMENT City of Tacoma, WA Prepared for: Western Washington Corporation of SDA c/o Brent Lambeth, R.A. 355 NW 48th Street Seattle, WA 98107 August 2018 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup WA 98371 (253) 770 1401 Fax (253) 770 1473 heathtraffic.com SDA FEDERAL WAY TRIP GENERATION & PARKING ASSESSMENT 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Seventh-Day Adventist project proposes for the construction of a new 12,894 square foot church in the City of Federal Way. The subject site is located on a 1.65-acre parcel: 2154840010 bordered by Weyerhaeuser Way S to the east and south of S 320th Street. The site is shared by a multi -tenant office building as shown in the figure below. Access is provided via one full -movement driveway on Weyerhaeuser Way S. Parking on the subject property will be restriped to accommodate ADA stalls and will total 111 stalls. Based on an aerial survey, an additional 112 parking stalls are offered in the shared parking lot. The new church is proposed for a 328-seat occupancy capacity. Church gatherings are to be held Saturdays only with two services spanning from approximately 8 AM to 1 PM. No other services/activities will be offered, including on weekdays. A site plan illustrating the overall configuration of the project is presented in Figure 2. This assessment forecasts anticipated vehicular and parking demands associated with the proposed incoming church. Figure 1: Site Aerial t. +i • *#....-# *3 2 f N HEATH & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC AND CIVIL ENGINEERING � I I I ............... ----- -- ---� I I •'�' • , ALL PARKING & I �— �_ SIDEWALKS ARE EXISTING _ I� L ` _ AROEL 1 - 1 65 ACRE'1f _ i I 11 I I a PROPOSED- �•I 12,694 SF r j BUILDING I t l 1 w^wyw-•.�. -- , ti M 1� I ' I I PARCEL2 I EXISTING 2 STORY BUILDING I 0 Lo 4 WN G i SDA FEDERAL WAY SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 3 2. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation is defined as the number of vehicle movements that enter or exit a site during a designated time period such as a specific peak hour or an entire day. Data presented in this analysis was derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) publication Trip Generation, 10th Edition. The proposed land use correlates to an ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 560 for Church. Average rates and square footage were used for trip generation estimates. It should be noted that ITE Sunday rates were used for Saturday projections due to the proposed service times of the SDA Church. Table 1 Project Trip Generation Weekday AM P.H. Weekday PM P.H. Saturday P.H. Land Use Size AWDT ASDT In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total Church 12,894 sf 90 2 2 4 3 3 6 356 62 67 129 (560) AWDT: Average Weekday Daily Trips; ASDT: Average Saturday Daily Trips; P.H.: Peak -Hour As shown in Table 1, approximately 129 (62 inbound/67 outbound) Saturday peak hour trips can be anticipated. The weekday PM peak hour results in only a minor increase in new traffic with a total of 6 trips. 3. PARKING DEMAND As mentioned, the site will offer 111 parking stalls on the subject parcel. The adjoining property on the shared lot offers an additional 112 parking stalls for a site total of 223. A site visit was conducted on Saturday, August 25th, 2018 at 10 AM to identify weekend parking occupancy. The site visit concluded a total of 12 occupied stalls for a net 211 unoccupied parking stalls. Moreover, an SDA office is located on parcel 2154650100, just south of the site and has offered their lot, should overflow parking occur. No occupied stalls were observed in the SDA office parking lot. Required Parking Based on the site zoning Office Park 1 (OP-1) and pursuant to FWRC 19.235.110, the minimum number of off-street parking required is 1 stall for each 5 seats. The church has a maximum occupancy load of 328, therefore: 328 / 5 = 66 parking stalls. The project significantly exceeds minimum City parking requirements with the proposed 111 parking stalls. 4 Peak Parking Demands Peak parking demands are derived from ITE's publication Parking Generation, 4th Edition. Parking demands are analyzed with a worst -case approach by assuming a full -occupancy service which primarily only occurs during holidays or special occasions. Routine services for churches typically operate closer to an 80 percent occupant load. Nonetheless, ITE rates suggest an average demand of 0.45 vehicles per attendee and an 85th percentile rate of 0.60 vehicles per attendee, therefore: Table 2 Peak Parking Demands Attendees Average 85th Percentile 328 0.45 veh = 148 stalls 0.60 veh = 197 stalls Assuming a service with full -occupancy, approximately 148 to 197 stalls can be expected to be occupied. The shared site was found to accommodate a total of 211 parking stalls, meeting projected worst -case demands. No spillover parking is anticipated, though the SDA office just south of the project site has available capacity to support additional parking. 3. CONCLUSIONS AND MITIGATION The SDA project proposes the construction of a new 12,894 square foot church located on a shared site with a multi -tenant office building (parcel: 2154840010). The subject property is within the City of Federal Way limits and provides one access to the adjacent Weyerhaeuser Way S roadway. Two services will be offered on Saturdays only with no services/activities offered during weekdays. Based on ITE data, approximately 129 (62 inbound/67 outbound) Saturday peak hour trips are anticipated to travel from/to the site. The site was found to accommodate a total of approximately 211 parking stalls for weekend demands. A church service at full occupancy would result in demands of up to 197 parking stalls. All parking is anticipated to be captured on -site with no spillover occurring. 5 SDA FEDERAL WAY TRIP GENERATION & PARKING ASSESSMENT APPENDIX 5/15/2018, https:/Iitetdpgen.org/PdntGraph T?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperod=AWDVTf� &edition=385&locationCode=General Urban/... Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 7 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 21 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 5% t. GFA _TT Average Rate _ Range of Rates A Standard Deviation 6.95 3.01 - 13.14 2.98 Data Plot and Equation 400 300 N C W a H I I 200 X 100 x X X 00 10 20 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 6.14(X) + 17.09 30 40 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers Average Rate R== 0.67 X 7 https://itetdpgen.org/PdntGraph.htm?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=AW DVTE&x=&edition=385&locationCode=General%20Urban/Suburban&countedMoc 5/15/2Q18 https://itetdpgen.org/PrintGrap?code=560&iviabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TASIDE&r- jedition=385&IocationCode=General Urban/Su... Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 8 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 34 Directional Distribution: `60% entering, 40% exiting-________ --_- Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation I 0.33 0.08 - 0.94 0.24 Data Plot and Equation 50 X 40 N W 30 a u i H 20 X f W X XX XX X - - -- - -- - - -100-- - -- - 15P -- T 200 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.36(X) - 0.74 R2= 0.79 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers 8 https:Hitetripgen.org/PdntGraph.htm?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperod=TASI DE&x=&edition=385&IocationCode=General%20U rban/Suburban&countedMode 5/15/201a https://itetdpgen.org/PrintGra?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE9--&edition=385&locationCode=General Urban/S-.. Church. (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 13 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 32 Directional Distribution: 45% entering, 55% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 5A Ft. GFA Average Rate _ Range of Rates .-. i 0.49 0.14 - 2.10 Data Plot and Equation 50 X 40 v W 30 a f= I J- 20 X X X Standard Deviation 0.40 X 10 X XX. W X� o-- - - - --- - -- - - --- -- - - - -- -- 0 50 100 15f 200 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.37(X) + 3.90 RI= 0.65 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers 9 https://itetdpgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSI DE&x=&edition=385&locationCode=General%20U rban/Suburban&countedMode 5/15/2018 https://itetdpgen.org/PdntGra"kttm?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timepedod=TSUN24--i&edition=385&IocationCode=General Urban/S... Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Sunday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 6 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 23 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting _ T Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 27.63 12.51 - 77.86 19.39 Data Plot and Equation 1,200 X X 1.000 800 w v c W a H 600 X 400 X X 200 06 10 20 30 40 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R7= *"** Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition r Institute of Transportation Engineers 10 https://Itetdpgen.org/PdntGraph.htm?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TSU N24&x=&edition=385&IocationCode=General%2OU rban/Suburban&countedMod( 5/15/2al8, https://itetdpgen.org/PdntGrap}7?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TSUNPK-'T&edition=385&IocationCode=General Urban/S... Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Sunday, Peak Hour of Generator Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 18 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 35 Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft_GFA . I Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.99 2.05 - 51.31 7.77 Data Plot and Equation X 1.500 N C W CL 1,000 u X H X 500. X X X X X X XX X XX 00 50 - --- - - - - - -10G 150 260 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 8.18(X) + 63.81 R2= 0.58 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers 11 https:/fiitetdpgen.org/PdntGraph.htm?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timepedod=TSU N PK&x=&edition=385&IocationCode=General%20Urban/Suburban&countedMod Land use; 560 Church Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs. Attendees On a: Sunday Statistic _ - --- - Peak Period _ Peak PeriGd Demand 9:00 a.m. 1:00 .m.; 7:00-8:00 p.m. Number of Study Sites 17 Average Size of Study Sites 356 attendees Average Peak Period Parking Demand 0.45 vehicles per attendee Standard Deviation 0.17 Coefficient of Variation 38% Range 0.12-0.71 vehicles per attendee 85th Percentile 0.60 vehicles per attendee 33rd Percentile 0.42 vehicles per attendee Sunday Peak Period Parking Demand U) 800 °' 700 600 j 500 400 ` 300 a 200 li 100 .60 a 0 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 x = Attendees R� = 0.89 Institute o Actual Data Points Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate of Transportation Engineers Parmrn Generation, 4th Edilior t icy -ALTA OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Issued By: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RECEIVED OCT 3 0 2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Policy Number: 0095595-06 Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS, CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Florida corporation (the "Company") insures, as of Date -of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against - loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of: 1. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (ii) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (iii) a document affecting Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized by law; (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney; (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law; or (vii,) a defective judicial_ or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. 5. The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land; or (d) environmental protection if a notice, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's Policy (06/17/2006) Printed: 06.28.17 @ 09:55 AM Page 1 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 •CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain if a notice of the exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of ail'ot aiiy part of ffie He to or any interest-m .the band occurs ing prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notice of its- existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien credii`or. 10. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CHICAGO TITLE -INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers. Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98104 Countersigned By:� }� 47 ; Authorized Officer or Agent Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: President ,C _ Secretary ti AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. uNDTTIiL ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA owner's Policy (06/17/2006) Printed: 06.28.17 ® 09:55 AM Page 2 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 -CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees, or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Lana; (ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental, police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferentiat transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAT PTie ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as Aft - of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. n!_'fA 0 vilPI''s Policy (06/17/2006) Printed: 06.28.17 @ 09:55 AM Page 3 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 SCHEDULE A Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Commercial / Unit 6 Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98104 Address Reference: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA 98001 Date of Policy Amount of Insurance Premium 650 $, June 23, 2017 at 03:37 PM 000.00 $2,582.00 1. Name of Insured: Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, a Washington nonprofit corporation 2. The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title is vested in: Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, a Washington nonprofit corporation 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF THIS POLICY VALID ONLY IF SCHEDULE B IS ATTACHED END OF SCHEDULE A �N AME0.ICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's Policy (0611712006) Printed: 06.28.17 @ 09:55 AM Page 4 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 EXHIBIT "A" Legal. Description Lot 1, East Campus Terrace - Lot G (Binding Site Plan), according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 252 of plats, pages 59 through 63, inclusive, in King County, Washington. AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.`'' ALTA Owner's Policy (0611712006) Printed: 06.28.17 aQ 09:55 AM Page 5 WA CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses that arise by reason of. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS None AM ERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAN.EN TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's PoNcy (051171200 6) Printed: 06.28.17 @ 09-55 AM Page 6 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 �CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: -Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District, a municipal corporation Purpose: Right of way for water facilities and all appurtenances related thereto Recording Date: September 3, 1999 Recording No.: 19990903000828 Affects: An Easterly portion of said premises; and other property 2. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: City of, FederafrWay, a municipal' corporation_ Purpose: Ingress and egress for inspection of and to reasonably monitor the stormwater treatment and detention facilities Recording Date: September 16, 1999 Recording No.: 19990916001926 Affects: Said premises and other property Said instrument contains provisions for bearing the cost of maintenance, repair or reconstruction of the facilities by the grantor of said document 3. Reciprocal driveway and utility easement and shared cost agreement and the terms and conditions thereof Between: The Quadrant Corporation, a Washington corporation And: Capital One Bank Recording Date: December 27, 2001 Recording No.: 20011227000839 Said easement/agreement has been modified by first amendment thereto, recorded Under recording number 20051221000599 4. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District, a municipal corporation Purpose: Water and/or sewer facilities and all appurtenances related thereto Recording Date: May 19, 2006 Recording No.: 20060519000191 Affects. A Westerly portion of said premises and other property lying within a strip of land 30 feet in width t� AM ERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. RepHnted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owners Paiiry (06117/2006) Printed: 06.28.17 @ 09:56 AM Page 7 wA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 -CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE (continued) 5. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington corporation Purpose: One or more utility systems for transmission, distribution and sale of gas and electricity Recording Date: October 1�6, 20015 Recording No.: 20061016001372 Affects: A portion of herein described premises 6. Easement agreement and the terms and conditions thereof Between: Esther L. Porter, a married woman, dealing with her sole and separate property, Judith Schneider, a married woman dealing with her sole and separate property, Esther L. Porter and Judith Schneider, trustees of the Siegbert and'Ruth 'Klebe'Farnily:Trust dated 1-24-91 And: Weyerhaeuser Company, a Washington corporation Recording Date: April 9, 2007 Recording No.: 20070409000213 Regarding: Establishment of power easement and related covenants and provisions 7. Mineral Reservation contained in deed from Weyerhaeuser Company, a Washington corporation Recording Date: May 21, 1996 Recording No.: 9605210333 8. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on Plat of East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 (Binding Site Plan): Recording No: 19990916001397 An easement delineated on said plat has been modified by amendment and release document recorded under recording number 20060411001775 9. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medica4 condition or genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: September 16, 1999 Recording No.: 19990916001928 I{µ�ll1[A!! ITM Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's Policy (06/17/2006) Printed: 06.28.17 @ 09:56 AM Page 8 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 SCHEDULE :B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE (continued) 10. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in. applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on Plat of East Campus Terrace -Lot G (Binding Site Plan): Recording No: 20090921001612 11. Terms, conditions and provisions contained in City of Federal Way Ordinance Number 94-219 Recording Date: October 26, 1994 Recording `No.: 9410260933 Said ordinance/agreement has been modified by first amendment thereto recorded under recording number 20030513002214 12. Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof Between: Lakehaven Utility District, a municipal, corporation And: The Quadrant Corporation Recording Date: December 22, 1999 Recording No.: 19991222001643 Regarding: Construction of certain sewer and water mains and appurtenances and payment of costs related thereto 13. Release or damage agreement and the terms and conditions thereof Between: Panattoni•Developrnertt Co. And: Lakehaven Utility District Recording Date: July 18, 2007 Recording No.: 20070718001857 Releasing Lakehaven Utility District from all future claims for damages resulting from: Non -conforming side sewer connection 14. Agreement and the terms ar-rdl condistions thereof Between: Panattoni Development Company LLC And: Lakehaven Utility District Recording Date: July 18, 2007 Recording No.: 20070718001860 Regarding: Joint private sewer main; maintenance provisions and restrictions related thereof AMERICAN American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as c of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's Policy (06117/2006) Prfnted 06.28.17 @ 09:56 AM Page 9 wA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-009559 -06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE (continued) 15. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted in deed Grantee: King County Recording Date: September 15, 1978 Recording No.: 7809150862 16. Terms and conditions of notice of charges by water, sewer, and/or storm and surface water utilities, recorded under recording number 8905120210. 17. Any rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by survey by CentrePointe Consultants, Inc., P.S., dated June 12, 2017, under .fob No. 3707, Matters Shawn: Existence of concrete steps and handrail's providing access between the land and property adjoining on the Northwest, and any rights pertaining thereto 18. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2017 Tax Account No.: 215484,001 D-07 Levy.Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $646,000.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $10,838.14 Paid: $5,419:07 Unpaid: $5,419.07 19. Declaration of Reciprocal'Easements and Access Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof Executed by: Langley Commercial Investments Ltd., a British Columbia company Recording Date: June 23, 2017 Recording No.: 20170623001197 END OF SCHEDULE B AMER CATI Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND nr E The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's Policy (0611712006) Printed: 06.28.17 @ 09:56 AM Page 10 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 CONDITIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, increased by Section 8(b), or decreased by Sections 10 and 11 of these Conditions. (b) "Date of Policy": The date designated as "Date of Policy" in Schedule A. (c) "Entity": A corporation, partnership, trust, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity. (d) "Insured": The Insured named in Schedule A. (i) The term "Insured" also includes (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next of kin; (B) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger, consolidation, distribution, or reorganization; (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity; (D) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the Title (1) if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are wholly -owned by the named Insured, (2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, (3) if the grantee is wholly -owned" by an affiliated Entity of the named Insured; provided the affiliated Entity and the named Insured. are both wholly -owned by the same person or Entity, or (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes. (ii) With regard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) reserving, however, all rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company would have had against any predecessor Insured. (e) "Insured Claimant": An Insured claiming loss or damage. (f) "Knowledge" or "Known"; Actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by reason of the Public Records -or any other records that impart constructive nnuce of-matlers ,affecting the Title. (g) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. (h) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for vatue and without Knowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Pu0c, Records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court for the district where the Land is located. Q) "Title": The estate or interest described in-Schedufe A. (k) "Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title to be released from the obligation to ourchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Conditions, (ii) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title, as insured, and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Title, as Insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy shall be reduced to the extent of the prejudice. 4. PROOF OF LOSS In the event the Company Is unable to deterrnihe the amount of loss or damage, the Company may, at its option, require as a condition of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof of loss. The proof al loss must describe the defect, lien, encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. f� AM E RI CAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as c of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owm: is PcAry (06/17/2006) Printed' 06,2.8,17 @ 09:56 AM Page 11 WA CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 (continued). 5. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (a) Upon written request by the Insured, and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs, or expenses incurred by the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege matters not insured against by:this .policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable to the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsection, it must do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Company brings an action or asserts a defense as required or permitted by this policy, the Company may pursue the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from any adverse judgment or order. 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT T.O. COOPERATE (a) in all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of -any action or proceeding and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, including the right to use, at its option, the name of the Insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. (b) The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and .to ,produce -for examination, inspection, and copying, at such reasonable .times and places as may be designated by the authorized representative of the Company, all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, ledgers, checks, memoranda, correspondence, reports, e-mails, disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or control of a third party [hat reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Insured Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce any reasonably requested information, or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS',, TERMINIATIOR OF LIABILITY In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy, other than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any -litigation. (b) To -Pay or Otherwise -Settle With'.Parties Other Than the lnsured.or With the:lnsured Claimant. (i) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against under this policy. In addition, the Company will pay any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or (ii) to pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the Insured under this policy for the claimed: loss or damage, other than the payments required, to be made, shall terminate, including, any liability or obligation, to defend, prosecute-, OF continue any litigation. 8. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy. AMERICAN rararRICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TITLE ASSOCi ATION The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's Policy (0611712006) Printed: 06,28.17 @ 09:56 AM Page 12 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 (continued) (a) The extent of liability of the Company for loss or damage under this policy shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the Amount of Insurance; or (ii) the difference between the value of the Title as insured and the value of the Title subject to the risk insured against by this policy. (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title, as insured, (i) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by Ten percent (10%), and (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the -right to have the loss or damage determined either as of the -date the claim was made by the Insured Clahaot or as of -the date it is settled and paid. (c) In addition to the extent of liability under (a) and (b), the Company will also pay those costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Conditions. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged defect, lien, or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or froth the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable Title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to the Insured. (b) in the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final, determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition off all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance by the amount of the payment. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B orto which the.insured has agreed, assumed, or.taken subject, or which:is executed by an Insured after Date of,Pclicy and which is a charge or lien on the Title, and the amount so paid sbail be deemed a payment to the Insured under this policy. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be made within thirty (30) days. 13. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a) Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the Company. If requested by the Company. the Insured Claimant shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Company of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured Claimant, the Company shall defer the exercise of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have recovered its loss. (b) The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the Insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance, or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments that address subrogation rights. 14. ARBITRATION Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association ("Rules'). Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is Two Million and No/100 Dollars ($2,000,000) or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of Two Miltion and Noll00 Dollars ($2,000,000) shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (a) This policy together with all: endorsements, if any, attached,to it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the Insured, andthe Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shalt be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage that arises out of the status of the Title or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted to this policy. (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in writing and authenticated by an authorized person, or expressly incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. stator: AMERICAN Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LA1T1 T„ V The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as A V of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's Policy (06/17/2006) Printed: 06.28.17 @ 09:56 AM Page 13 WA CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. 0095595-06 (continued) (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and provisions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not (1) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 16. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of this policy, in whole or in part, is held Mvalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed notto include that provision or such part held to be invalid, but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM. (a) Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined the premium charged therefor in reliance upon the lavaffecting interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles to determine the applicable law. (b) Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 1.B. 'NOTICES, WHERE SENT Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company under this policy must be given to the Company at: Chicago Title Insurance Company P.O. Box 45023 Jacksonville, FL 32232-5023 Attn: Claims Department END OF CONDITIONS Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. LAND TILE The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Owner's Policy (0611712006) Printed: 06.2a.17 @ 09:56 AM Page 14 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622476-SPS-72306-1-17-0095595-06 RECEIVED Lakehaven OCT 3 0 2018 WATER 8, SEWER DISTRKJ NFV MECOMMU€TYDEDEVELOPMENT Lakehaven Water & Sewer District — Development Engineering Section 31623 — 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way., WA 98063-4249 Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 * Email: DE@Lakehaven.org This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, water service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. �W Proposed Land Use: q Building Permit-SFR ❑ Building Permit-MFR ® Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Rezone ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ® Other (specify/describe) Land Use ReviewlApnroval Tax Parcel Number(s): 2154840010 Site Address: 32125 Weverha�ay S Lakehaven GIs Grid: M-09 Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: N/A sf New Bldg. Area Proposed: UNKNOWN sf Applicant's Name: We ern Wash'n on Gonferen a of SDA WATER SYSTEM 1KIFORM TON 1. ® Water service can be provided by service connection to an existing 1Z diameter water main that is on the site. 2. ® If ad dtio Ei—a —1—fi—re—hi-dra.0.1151—required, water service for the site will require an improvement to Lakehaven's water distribution system of: ❑ a. feet of " diameterwater main to reach the site; and/or ® b. The construction of a water distribution system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive water system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ® d. Other (describe): € akehaven D vgloner Extension AgreemenLree uired. 3. ® a. The existing water system is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan. ❑ b. The existing water system is not in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The subject property is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of water service outside of Lakehaven's water service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Water service is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ® b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven; ® c. Other: Water Service Connection A I€cations irg d. Comments/special conditions: The nearest fire hydrant is on the Property (as marked on map on the back of this page). Fire Flow at no less than 20 psi available within the water distribution system is a minimum 2.500 GPM for two (2) hours or more. This flow figure depicts the theoretical performance of the water distribution system under high demand conditions. Fire flow rates greater than this may be accommodated through water distribution system improvements, contact Lakehaven for additional information. 578 Pressure Zone Est. Meter Elevation(s)-GIS: 444+/- Est. Pressure Range at Meter(s) (psi): Min. 55, Max. 64 I hereby certify that the above water system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUP RVISO Signature: I If Date: l /_2 I 2154840010 wtr.docx (Form Update 1/3/17) Page 1 of 2 2154840010 wtr.docx (Form Update 1/3/17) Page 2 of 2 SDA HISPANIC CHURCH 32125 WEYERHAESER WAY S FEDERAL WAY, WA PHOTO 1 - NORTH VIEW PHOTO 2 - EAST VIEW PHOTO 3 - SOUTH VIEW PHOTO 4 - W-tf,',+; .� a 2Is CITY OF FEDERAL- v`4AY commUi lY DEVELOP MEND(' LEGAL INVOICE Sound Publishing Unit Main 11323 Commando Rd W Everett WA 98204 City of Federal Way -Comm Devel 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Legal Description: City Notices Ordered By: Tina Piety Issues Ordered: 1 Start Date: 03/29/2019 03/29/2019 Account # 239428 Invoice# FWM850247 Legal # FWM850247 Published: Federal Way Mirror Stop Date: 03/29/2019 Due: $104.45 Please return this with payrneut. Questions? Call I-800-485-4920 City ofFederal Way -Comm Devel 33325 8th Ave S. Account # 239428 Federal Way, WA 98003 Invoice# FWM850247 Due: $104.45 CITY OF �.. Federal Way Centered on Op ortunir P 1 Mr. Brent Lambeth Brent Lambeth Architect LLC 355 NW 480, Street Seattle, WA 98107 h w U i]iar11 !!f'.C1.C[lrit Re: File 18-105DSU-00_UP, -PROCESS III CONDITIONAL APPROVAL SDA Hispanic Church, 32115 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Lambeth: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue Souttt Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor July 23, 2019 The City of Federal Ways Community Developmcnr Department has completed an administrative review of the proposed 12,894 square Foot SDA Hispanic Church and site improvements located at 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way Sout". The Process III land use application subn-itted on October 30, 2018 is hereby conditionally approved. The proposal meets site plan revicty criteria set forth in Iredellql ili1y Re,,%red Code (MY/RC) 19-65.100, as found in the enclosed Exhibit A —Findings for Process ITI Site Plan Approval and development into this decision a reference. The remainder of [his letter outlines the zoning send development review process required for this proposal and a summary of appeal procedures. REQUrRED REVIEW PROCESS The proposed church use and proposed site improvements are subject to discussed in the Findings for PrOCeSN III Approval. Process III Site Plan Review as SEPA PROCESS Following review of the environmental checklist, the city determined the proposal would rror have a probable signiFcant adverse impact vn the environment, an Envitnil?Neljtdllm�iaits�d��rposa not required. The p emf is issued a Determination of NonsignificanCe (DNS) on LtF;treh 29, 20I9 (city {' t9 determination comment period ended April 12, 2019, and a eal ( t3 tie 18-105081-SE), The threshoId appeals were received by the city in repose to the DNS, pp puis�d ended May 3, 2019; No comments or CONDITIONS OF PROCESS III APPROVAL a. All Parking lot landscape islands shall include a minimum of one tree (with shrubs and groundcover), and must be shown on the final landscape plan. b. Landscape screening of all ground mounted equipment and above ground utilities must be shown on the final landscape plan. c. Eliminate the reference to the stormwater detention pond between the parking area and Weyerhaeuser Way South. d. The engineer will need to re-evaluate the amount of stormwater detention that may be required for this Project, based on the larger, as -constructed, volume. This ttyvaater detention analysis shall be addressed by the project engineer in storconjunction with the engineering permit review di permit, and shall be a condition of approval, for the building j�4r. Brent Lambeth p;lgc 2 of 2 }ul}' �3, 2019 AppRovAL DURATIONfor or appealed, the Process III decision is valid for five the laps of app oval Eollo- i g the Year llnless modifiedF decision. Time extensions to the decision tiny ro requested p 'c' rss listed in �iUi�C 19.15.110. "1'he unpranetnents must be substantially completed �vitl7us the five y provisions rime period, or tlae land use decision becomes void. APPEALS ursu2nt to The eEfectivc dat e of this decision is July 2fi, 2019, or three days from ed by the applicant; ny,per on who erss who has specifically requested a copy of the decision; 19.65.120, ubmi ed ritten oomoment or informs tian;tany7 p ess nta� �e s submitted or the city. ust 9, 2019, which is 14 calendar days after issuance of the A written notice of appeal to the I3earing Exanun r must be delivered to the Depart"ne"'t of Comm"nt ' Develaprnent with d7c established appeal fee by g including the idenuftcarion of the specific >inclings and conclusions decision. "I'he appeal letter must contain aear reference to the matter betas appealed an a s t alleged errors in the directors decision, person made by the director disputed by the person filing. ture City of Federal y policies, and nis lane This land use decision floes not wai�tc� F �ro�ess 1II app rival does not constitute approve of a building standards relating to thus developm grade the site. permit or authorization to clear and uesrions regardtn$ this decision, please contact Senior Planner Jim Harris at 253-835-2652, If you have any 9 or im.l7arri;ctt�'ffetler`tlga'.L(1177. Sincerely, 1 • Brian Davis Community Development Director enc: j xhihit A "Findings for project Appravnl" F"c Checklist 18-1050Bo. Up .01 & A3.02 by Bulletin #1oS, Cornmerclal Building i'ermit Appro ved Site Plan Sheets Al tB-30-1� by Brent ],anrhetla; prelumn�Y rlec�atsans Sheets A3Brent Lambet not ensiosed but idealtificd htrrin for rcfcrtncc) (topics of approved rim plant sheets are c_ Jim 1-Iarsis, Senior planner i{evin Petersnst, Seniur Bnoncering Plans Reviewer Steady Long, 5cniar1 1'ransportation Pla13 stning ngincer Greg Kirk, Pialta 1'sxamincr Chris CgJsun, South King l'ixc & Itt�3cuc Brian Asbury,.I akchavcn Watcr & SeWer Di, hicl I- ri+ llavis, fi t: o{SDA, 32229 Weyor"Stcuser Way South, Jlcdcral Way, WA 98001; c r z itfit c-+ Uoc lU 79202 is-I000wul' 4kCITY OF �� Federal Way Exhibit A Findings for Project Approval Federal Way %'Di"d 'Ode (F"VRC) Chapter 19.65, "Process III Project Approval' A Nispanic Church Federal Way, File #18-105080-UP Tile Director of Community Development hereby makes the following findings pursuant to content requirements of the Process III written decision as set forth in Federal Way Revised Code {FWRC) 19.65.100(4). These findings are based on review of city documents and i and received October 30, 2015, and January 11. 2019. tems submitted by the applicant Abbreviations cited: Federal 1'Yay Re►,ised Code (F'WRC 1994 cede); Concomitant , current code); Federal Way City Code FWCC Zoning Agreement (CZA); and CZA Exhibit D (OP-1 regulations). Prapasal —The proposal is construction of anew 12,894 square foot church building on a I.65 acre parcel. The building's proposed to be constructed on an existing foot pat}, which ad was Previously prepared and graded in conjunction with construction of the adjacent building. The proposal is to -0 constructed a Lot I East Campus ,Lot G Binding Site Plan (BSP), King County tax parcel ng office The subject property is developed with a parking lot which is shared with the adjoining office building on Lot 2. The applicant is proposing to construct the 12,894 square phase construction of the interior spaces. foot building shell as one unit, and then 2. Zoning and Cvrnprehensive Plan Designat Weyerhaeuser iop: _The proposal is subject to the provisions of the 1994 Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Development A regulations in effect on August 23, 1994 (FWCC}. An p Agree (CZA} and zoning code (FWRC). Zoning for the subject roe Y procedural requirements must meet current J property rty is Office Park (OP -I), Church use is permitted in the OP-1 zone pursuant to CZA Exhibit D, Section IiI. designation for the subject property is Office Park. The Federal Way GQmprehensive Plan {FWCP} 3. Site Plan Review Process — Per Section 111.D of the OP-1 regulations, the project requires review under Process ill, Project ,approval. The Director of Community Development makes a written decision on the application based on the criteria listed under ity D 19lo 1 e 4. Public Notice 0"Mlicarion — Pursuant to Process III regulations, a Notice o Published in the Federal Flay Mirror, posted on the subject property, Application each of the official was as notification boards of the city and public libraries located within the cposted f receiving the property tax statements for all posted and mailed to the persons Property on December 7, 20l S. No com <nproperty within 300 feet of each b ents were submitted to the city in reoundary of the subject sponse to the aNOA. Findings for 1'rojecl Appm�al SDA Hispanic Church Lot 1 East Campus Terrace Lot G File No: 18-105080-00-UP/Doc, I.D. 79402 Page I of 8 ,' ►:n:enia� f'olrc}�,4ct {S iA) —The proposed improvements exceed categorical exemption 5. State Enl Iro WAC) 197-11-SUO and FWRC 14.15.030. The levels pursuant to Washington Admhiistl•ative Code ( (city file 18-105081-SE). April 12, 2019, and appeal period ended May 3, city issued a Determination of Nonsigni is ended Ap n March 29, 2419 (' Y The threshold determination comet period 2019. No comments or appeals were received by the city in response to the DNS.develo meni ulations, the P the corresponding use in the 13N, Cp, or MP zones as 6, Bulk & Dir+zerrsinna.! Requirements —Per section Il1.D of the C arils for a church use in the OP standards shall conform to those identified by of the appropriate. Note; there is no use zone chart and development stand taken from the office use zoning chart from the � e9rnblance zone, BN zone, or MP none as discussed in the CZA Exhlblt D Section 111_D. Therefore, man development standards identified below ar FWCC Section 22-826, as the office use permitted in FWCC Section 22-826 is the closest to the permitted church use in the OP-1 permittedmum Per Section I11.I) of the op-1 regulations and FWCC Section 2 E Th26, e tallest portion of the proposed e building elevation (AB) The height complies with the building height is 35 feet above averag plan sheet A3.02. Thep p building is 26.5 feet based on elevation p elevation. gW CC maximum of 35 feet above building The proposed building meets the minimum building setback requirements in FWCC Section 22-826. site plan, civil site plan, and landscape plan show a new retaining pond between tfle The preliminary P and is not permitted in thus location as aPe existing parking lot and Weyerhaeuser Way. This retaining p Fast Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding this first 25 feet adjacent to Weyerhaeuser Way yrSouth is designated as a 25-foot wide stree sra asal. (landscape) area on the underlying plat of the Property and is no longer part of the p p Site Plan). The applicant has indicated that this new retaining p ro ert is developed with 111 an -site parking stalls, and also has ert The shared parking agreement is 7. Parking Requirenterrts The subject utwith the adjoining property. a total of 211 shared parking within covenants far the praPertY under King County recording number 20170623001197. contalned ect traffic the pmj RC Parking standards for Since there is no use acne chart i�h� 1994 he site based onccurrettt FW use in the op Pane, parking engineer evaluated the parking demand assessment by Heath and Assaciates Inc, evaluates the p cl>.urah use. The August 2018 p church demand based on two different standards, the FWR Land ITTE. The and forthe Proposed etes Parking Assessment is incorporated herein and adequately as parking OP zone ulineal feet Of sin the minimum church parking requirements based on church use in an use, In summary. g ent FWRC zone chart pWRC 19.235.1 to Lane stall for 66 spacese(328ats maximor um Oc upancy undercurrent parking stall count �s bench seating), the minimum required p 32815 = 66). The 66 required parking stall demand divided by 1 stall per 5 occupants in sanctuary stalls. under this assessment is aommodated by the existing 111 on using parking the 1TE parking demand of 0.45 The Heath parking assessment also analyzed parking demand usin er attendee Based on this 1TE percentile rate of 0.60 Vehicles p 'h ercentile) vehicles per attendee, and an 85 p equals 148 stalls demand, and (85 P analysis, equals attendees;97 stalls demand 0.45 vehicles 0.60 vehicles king area with the Proposed church has a The adjacent office building on Lot 2 that shares the par CC based parking requiTei1ent of 100 stalls, based on l stall per 30Q square feet of building. File Na: 18-105080-40 uPlDw- I.D. 79402 Page 2 of 8 Findings for Project Approval SDA Hispanic Church Lot t East Campus Terrace Lot G Per the Heath Parking Assessment, the SDA church has two services offered on Saturdays only, with no services/activities offered during weekdays. Therefore, the existing 211 stall shared parking lot is adequate based on the Beath analysis as the proposed church and existing adjacent office (weekday parking peak) have significantly different peak hour usages, and the 211 stall parking lot is adequate for each of the peak usages per the Heath assessment. In addition, as noted in the Heath Assessment, the SDA church has an office just south of the project site and has available capacity to support additional parking. Based on the two evaluations above, the shared parking of 211 stalls accommodates the proposed church. $. Landscaping — Per Section 11I.D of the ORA regulations and FWCC Section 22-1566(h), Type III landscaping a minimum Often feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting public rights -of -way and access easements, and Type M landscaping a minimum of five feet in width shall be provided along all other perimeter lot lines. Per FWCC Section 22-826 Note #3, the first 25 feet of the required front yard must be Iandscaped and contain a three -foot -high berm, or three -foot -high dense, sight -obscuring vegetation. Parking and driving areas may he located in the second 25 feet of the required front yard. Per FWCC Section 22-1564(z), landscaping is not required along the interior lot lines within a development where parking is being shared, which is applicable to the parcel. The existing site landscaping meets the perimeter and interior parking lot landscape spatial requirements of the FWCC. The site landscape areas were approved in conjunction with development of the adjoining lot under city file 05-I03587-UP. The existing parking lot on the property meets the landscape design on requirements of FWCC Secti 22-1567(b)(1)(a)(ii). A couple of the islands are missing required trees and the replanting of these trees will be a condition of the final landscape plan review and approval. Per FWCC Section 22-1565(a)(1), ground level mechanical or electrical equipment and utility ond installations must be screened with Type I landscaping to provide a solid sight barrier. A cition of approval will require the transformer and landscaping to be shown on the landscaping plan with the building permit. submitted Additional items must be corrected on the landscaping plan submitted for the building permit; these items shall be made conditions of approval: a) On Sheet L1.0 a. All parking lot landscape islands shall include a mini groundcover. mum of one tree; with shrubs and b. Landscape screening of all ground mounted equipment and above ground utilities must be shown on the landscape plan. b) Eliminate the reference to the stormwater detention pond between the parking area and Weyerhaeuser Way South. 9. Tree Retention/Replacement — Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568, the development must retain or replace 25 percent of the existing significant trees on site. The development will not result in the removal of any significant trees, as the building pad already exists and there are no parking lot modifications or parking lot construction proposed. Findings for Project Approval SDA Hispanic Church Lot 1 East Campus Terrace Lot G File No: 18-1056$0 p() UP/D. I.D. 79402 Page 3 of 8 10. Forest Practices — A Forest Practices Class W-General Application is not applicable. 11. Critical Areas —There are no critical areas on the subject property or within 200 feet of the building pad. Therefore, no critical area analysis is required Tacoma caused widespread soil 12. Tacoma Smelter Plume — Tl1e former Asarco copper smelter in ap, and Thurston counties. This contamination with lead and arsenic in parts o g,for 1,000 square mile area is known as the Tacoma tof Eer l vlogy mapping checked nume. The state cleanup e2019 arsenic is 20 parts per million (ppm). According to D p m arsenic; subject property is located in the Tacoma Smelter Plume detect area containing under 20 pp licable. therefore, testing of site soils is not app ad, surrounded by an ant building 13. Clearing d� Grading — The vacant lot and ass ciated improvements - existing ntly a graded flat vac The only up andn actvitiesat will will paved developed parking occur is for excavation far the biniladii licabledtandarddset forth rin FWCC Division 7 and FWRC be reviewed for consistency nstructian permitting. pp Chapter 19.120, as p The section 14. Site gird Building Design —Per Section III.D of the sC � the OP zone (FWCC Seca on 22-8 b}rds shall conform to those identified by the corresponding u also states that provisions of the FWCC relating to lot coverage, fagade measurement, modulation, parking between structures and streets, and minimum lot si7zs for non-residential uses shall not apply. is, -To encc)uage proposals that The FWCC states that one of the purposes of site plan r , developmentron the subject property." embody good desigm principles that will result in high quality the design guidelines in 1996, after the effective date of The city adopted non-residential community letter for the SDA Hispanic Church, the CZA. In the August 16, 2016, preapplication summary applicant was encouraged to incorporate the adopted design guidelines to the extent possible. The project incorporates good design principles by meeting a number of provisions from the current code in the following ways. Site Design: r FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(1) states primary building entrances should be visible fx We the �aeutser of -way. The entrance of the proposed building is oriented toward the right-of-waY ( Y Way South). is connected to the public sidewalk by an existing separate r The entrance to the proposed building ayn as called for in FWCC Section 22- paved route delineated by stained, jointed concrete p g 1634(d)(2). Paved pedestrian routes are provided between buildings (reference FWCC Section 22- 1634[d][4]). ■ d to the property line with the office development A paved pedestrian connection is provide property to the northwest (lot C). Building and Site Design: proposed + The site design pr ovides foundation landscaping of varying widths on all sides of the prop building (reference FWCC Section 22-1635[b][2]). _. a_�nSnRi1 00-t}PIDoC_ I.D. 79402 page 4 of 8 Findings for Project Appres�al SDA Hispanic Church Lot 1 East Campus Terrace Lot G • The building includes a canopy over the entrance (reference FWCC Section 22-1635[b][3]). • Storefront glazing, pedestrian lighting, landscaping, and reveals are utilized to break up blank walls (reference FWCC Section 22-1635[c]). • A paved pedestrian plaza is located at the southeast entrance 'between the two buildings. Landscaping is Iocated on the periphery of the plaza to soften the overall appearance. • The proposed building incorporates changes in color and materials (reference FWCC Section 22-1635[c]). • Extruded brick veneer panels are located at building corners and along frontages. ■ The building is not modulated because the CZA specifically states that modulation of buildings shall not be required. FWCC Section 22-1564(u) requires building walls which are uninterrupted by window, door, or other architectural feature; that are 240 square feet or greater in area; and not located on a property line, to be screened by landscaping. The site plan and elevations comply with this provision, by incorporating windows, doors, and foundation landscaping. There are no unscreened blank wails in excess of 240 square feet. Final review of blank wall screening will occur with review of the final landscape plan with the building permit application. The proposed site layout and building design embodies good design principles and results in a high quality of development. 15. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment — The preliminary elevations do not identify any rooftop mechanical equipment. If any rooftop mechanical equipment is proposed, then FWCC Section 22-960(a) applies. 16. Garbage/Recycling — As the building pad and parking area are already developed, there is an existing trash enclosure area in the westerly portion of the parking lot. The enclosure area is screened and gated. 17. Additional Permitting — Additional permitting, such as engineering review and a building permit are required for site development; none of which have been applied for at this time. It is the applicant's responsibility to identify and obtain all required state, federal, or other agency permits as may be required. 18. Transportation — As a component of the Use Process III application, projects undergo traffic concurrency analysis pursuant to the state Growth Management Act (GMA); goals and policies of the FWCP; and Chapter 19.90 FWRC, "Transportation Concurrency Management." A Capacity Reserve Certificate was issued on July 8, 2019, The city's Level of Service Standard is met with the addition of the project. The proposed use generates six new weekday PM peak hour trips. The underlying parcels were created under the East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding Site Plans (BSP). As part of the Parcel 1 BSP development approval in 1998, traffic impacts identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by The Transpo Group were appropriately mitigated. Additional transportation mitigation will be required if the new proposed total square feet, or PM trips, exceed the approved threshold for the Parcel 1 BSP. 19. Street Frontage Improvements — Per FWRC 19.135.040, Weyerhaeuser Way South frontage n has bee improved to current standard and as such, no additional improvement is required. Findings for Project Approval SDA Hispanic Church Lot I East Campus Terrace Lot G File No: 18-105080-00-.UP/Doc. I.D. 79402 Page 5 of 8 17, 20. Storrirwater — Under "Existing Developed Site Hydrology" in the submittedthe enr vembr 4, 20 ates that the Stormwater Technical Information Report (TIR) by Rupert Engineering, g which h based existing pond volume (for the East Campus development) is 148,597 cubic feet (CF), further reading of that TIR, and on information found in the original development TIR. However, verified on the existing pond as -built drawings, shows that pond to have a total detention volume of 438,749 CF. It's unclear in the original TIR why the pond was finally designed and constructed to this that higher volume; however, given the large discrepancy fal detention. The engineer will need to re-evaluate the this project may not need to provide y amount of detention that may be required for thus project, based on the larger, as-constructed, a titian w volume. en This stormwater detention analysis shall be addressed and shall be a condition of approval. engineering permit review for the building permit 21. Water/Sewer — Lakehaven Water sewer&Sewer availability District in October water 2018.r and sewer service provider. Lakehaven issued certificates of water and Lakehaven encouragcs a wners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Iakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delay.$ in overall project development. 2on the Process III application and will review the 2. South King Fire & Rescue — SKFR has no comment building permit application. 23. Director's Dec ision Criteria —The D irector of stud underrCommu FWRC it Development makes a written decision on the application based on the criteria a. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; i. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject property is Office Park. The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (Revised 201 S) contains the following goals and policies: o LUGS: Create office and office park development that is known regionally, nationally, and internationally for its design and function_ o The building will be sited with its primary entrance facing Weyerhaeuser Way South, with a visual and pedestrian connection to the public right -of way. The facades are articulated through a variety of materials, colors, windows and foundation landscaping. The design of this project is consistent with Cp e rate Park. development surrounding this property and within the East Camp o LUG9: Work collaboratively to evaluate and realize the potential of the (former) Weyerhaeuser properties in East Campus. o The former Weyerhaeuser properties in East Campus are privately owned. The church building will continue the type of development anticipated for that area. o LUP 49. In the East Campus Gjfice Park area, encourage quality development that will complement existing uses and take advantage of good access to 1-5, Highway 18 and future light rail as well as proximity to the City Center. File No: 18-105080-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 79402 Findings for Project Approval Page 6 of 8 SDA Hispanic Church Lot 1 East Campus Terrace Lot G o The proposed church building and church use will complement existing land uses in the area. The proposed church is not incompatible with the type of development existing and anticipated for that area. The site has proximity to the City Center and regional road network. b. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRQ i. As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with applicable zoning regulations in effect on August 23, 1994 (FWCC), and procedural requirements of current code (FWRC), as detailed in this repots. c. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; The Community Development and Public Works Departments along wish Lakehaven Water & Sewer District and South Icing Fire & Rescue have reviewed the project for conformance with applicable city codes, including but not limited to; Iand use; environmental protection; stormwater; and transportation. Conformance with these codes will protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Additional details will be reviewed at the building/engineering permit stage. d. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; i. See the Transportation, Water & Sewer, Stormwater, and Conditions of Approval related sections of this report. e. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; and i. Access to the site will be provided via an existing driveway onto Weyerhaeuser Way South, which was designed and constructed with the adjoining building. No changes or modifications to the existing driveway are proposed. f. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated. i. Seethe Transportation section of this report. No modifications to the existing street frontage or access points are proposed or required. Traffic impacts created by the six additional weekday PM peak hour trips have been addressed under the concurrency permit and mitigated under the Parcel I BSP. 24. Conditions of Approval — The following conditions of approval are attached to the Process III decision: a. All parking lot landscape islands shall include a minimum of one tree; with shrubs and groundcover, and must be shown on the final landscape plan. b. Landscape screening of all ground mounted equipment and above ground utilities must be shown on the landscape plan. e. Eliminate the reference to the stormwater detention pond between the parking area and Weyerhaeuser Way South. Findings for Project t AppmVai File No: 18-105080-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 79402 SDA Hispanic Church Lot I East Campus Terrace Lot G Page 7 of 8 d. The engineer will need to re-evaluate the amount of stormwater detention that may be required for this project, based on the larger, as -constructed, volume. This stormwater detention analysis shall be addressed by the project engineer in conjunction with the engineering permit review for the building permit, and shall be a condition of approval. CONCLUSION As conditioned, the proposed site plan application has been determined to be consistent with the FWCP; with all applicable provisions of the FWCC and FWRC; and with the public health, safety, and welfare. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal, and the proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. The proposed development is consistent with Process III, Pi•ojecr Approval, decisional criteria required under Chapter 19.65 FWRC. The proposed site plan and application attachments have been reviewed for compliance with the FWCP, pertinent zoning regulations, and all other applicable city regulations. Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations, conditions of approval, and other applicable requirements. This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Senior Planner Jim HarriSt Date: July 23, 2019 File No: 18-105080-00-UP/Doc. I.D. 79402 Findings for Project Apprnti al. Page 8 of 8 SDA Hispanic Church ace Lot G Lot t East Campus Terr CITY OF z Federal Allay Centered are Opportunity Mr. Brent Lambeth Brent Lambeth, Architect LLC 355 NW 48t" Street Seattle, WA 98107 Re: File No. 18-105081-00-SE; SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATION SDA Hispanic Church, 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Lambeth: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway, com Jim Ferrell, Mayor March 29, 2019 1:1L E The city has reviewed the environmental checklist submitted for the SDA Hispanic Church. It has been determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsigrlificance (DNS) is enclosed. A 14-day comment period is required by the SEPA rules (WAC 197-11-340). A notice inviting comments will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted onsite, posted on the official public notification boards of the city and public libraries, and mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the site on March 29, 2019. At the end of the comment period, the department will determine if the DNS should be withdrawn, modified, or issued as proposed. All final determinations may be appealed within 21 days (May 3, 2019) following the comment deadline. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period. Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city has been granted. Approval or denial of the proposal will be made by the appropriate administrative or legislative body vested with that authority. After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after a permit has been issued), you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as set forth in RCW 43.21C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. A copy of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21C.080 and WAC 197-11-680 providing instructions for giving this notice are available from the Department of Community Development. The city is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. However, the city is responsible for giving a notice (to parties of record) stating the date for commencing a judicial appeal (including the SEPA portion of that appeal) if your proposal is one for which the city's action on it has a specified time period within which any court appeals must be made. Questions regarding the environmental review component should be directed to me at 253-835-2652, or jim.harris@qityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, �]1;rL, arris � Senior Planner enc: DNS [Eric Davis, WWC of SDA, 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South, federal Way, WA 98001 18-105081-00-SE Doa I.D. 78928 4ik o, Fed'0';:tSP eral Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, Maria Smith hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was ❑ emailed ❑x mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on March 2019, Project Name SDA Hispanic Church File Number(s) 18-105081-00-SE Signature Date March 29. 2019 CIT Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) SDA Hispanic Church - File No: 18-105081-00-SE Proposal: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements on an existing building pad. Proponent: WWC of SDA / Eric Davis, 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Location of Proposal: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2019. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on March 29, 2019. 18-105091-00-SE Doc 1D 78926 Vicinity Map ANt 4 Proposed SDA Church Site Doc- LD. 18-105081-00-SE M M 00 rn 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 � 3�� O N N 3 3 O° 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 F W >> A W W A Q¢ A Q Q Q A¢ a Q d o Q w 4:4 t U d W va CIO w u w x > w d w Q w Q W ¢ COO Gq W rn z z o O a ON ] 0 rr Q Q N rs O N N :, N cFF N ftF N cyy �� Mi r. L �Coo 3 J 7 [7 cn U � U U W U W >- � U Ca ] � W p� ¢ � a x � p F z W w Q E > P. H Z >0a U� 0 0�� a z .Zw v W ww.a '? rz [ ] `O xC4 zzAQ¢co CIO wu Qo 3 u u 3 w ¢¢ a .�cli000 O V "o O, 0 000 000 _ COT 001 Cy 0 CD 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 O CD CD 'n V) V> V) V) O 00 O 00 O = O = 00 00 N N ^ In In kn V) In d td If, �. d ,n ^- N N N N N N N N N N N zzr tc) CO ti 00 0) O T N T C7 T VC' A W r-: oQ Aj �+ LUE wO CC, � Z � RESUBMITT TL A E D •dy of Federal Way V I `y of 3V o' Parcel 2018 City 33325 Blh ve S NOV1\I 201� 333258thSeptembeAve Federal Way Wa. 98003 Federal WayNotification area c�0i=� ERAL WAY ���t°0°vaYcom OOMMtlNiiY DEVELOPMENT I L l -. t k FireAw 1 Stabon 64 - - - S 321ST ST C3 [� O �C N ae APO U n' a s aaxuus l CEO S 323RD ST $ tt o o co _to S 325TH ST to • U S 325M PL [51 CIL 460. i W, C Fi I y � N a w S, 832M PL, �- O z Legend King County Tax Parcels r3ir oe Scale: Federal Way Subject Property N 0 140 2s0 Feet t This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only. Notified Properties The City of Fcdcral Way makes no warranty as to Its accurary. T DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8t" Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityQffederalwoy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, E. Tina Piety hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice El Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation E Other SEPA Checkli ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was 130 emailed 0 mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on March 29 2019. Project Name SDA Hispanic Church File Number(s) 18-105081-00-SE Signature _ - .. - Date March 29. 2019 41k CITY OF Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) SDA Hispanic Church — File No: 18-105081-00-SE Proposal: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements on an existing building pad. Proponent: WWC of SDA / Eric Davis, 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Location of Proposal: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2 1 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2019. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (address below), no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Brian Davis Title: Director of Community Development Address: 33325 8tn Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 r Date Issued: March 29, 2019 Signature: 18-105081-00-SE Doc ID 78927 Vicinity Ma n N Proposed SDA Church Site 18-105081-00-SE Doc. LD. DEPT OF ECOLOGY WA ST DEPT TRANSPORTATION RAMIN PAZOOKI WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY SEPA UNIT PO BOX 47300 PO BOX 330310 PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7300 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 separegister@ecy.wa.gov h customerservice wsdot.wa. ❑v ram in. pazooki(Dwsdot_wa.gov PERRY WEINBERG DEPT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & SOUND TRANSIT PO BOX 43200 HISTORIC PRESERVATION 401 S JACKSON ST OLYMPIA WA 98504-3155 PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 SEATTLE WA 98104-2826 se adesk dfw.wa. ov -' sea dah ov err .weinber soundtranslt.gf .wa. MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE LAURA MURPHY DENNIS LEWARCH FISHERIES DIVISION TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST THP OFFICE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE SUQUAMISH TRIBE 39015 172"D AVE SE 39015 172ND AVE SE 18490 SUQUAMISH WAY AUBURN WA 98092 AUBURN WA 98092 SUQUAMISH WA 98392 karen.walterCaD,muckleshoot.nsn.us [aura.murphy@muckleshootnsn.us dlewarch su uamish.nsn.us ATTN SEPA REVIEW BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS FORTERRA PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT KING COUNTY OFFICE 1904 3RD AVE STE 105 3009 E PORTLAND AVE 901 5T" AVE STE, 2200 SEATTLE WA 98164 SEATTLE WA 98101-3317 TACOMA WA 98404 info forterra.ar sepa@pscleanair.arg brandon.reynon0pu allu tribe.com KING CO ROADS DIVISION TINA VASLET KING CO TRANSPORTATION COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER PIERCE TRANSIT 201 S JACKSON ST KSC-TR-0815 155 MONROE AVE NE PO BOX 99070 SEATTLE WA 98104 RENTON WA 98056 LAKEWOOD WA 98496-0070 harnld.tani uchi kin count . ov maint.roads kin count ov tvaslet iercetransit.or DAVID KORTHALS KC DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS EARTHCORPS METRO TRANSIT 500 4T" AVE RM 700 FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS 201 S JACKSON ST KSC-TR-0413 #ADM-AS-0708 6310 NE 74T" ST STE 201 E SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE, WA 98115 clavid.korthalskingcounty.gov assessor. info kin count ov infoC7earthcor s.orq lansreview kin count . ov ATTN NEWSROOM FEDERAL WAY MIRROR SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE 31919 1ST AVE S STE 101 31617 1ST AVE S 1950 S STATE ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TACOMA WA 98405 editor federalwa mirror.com chris.cahan southkin fire.or newsti s thenewstribune.com BRIAN ASBURY CITY OF AUBURN CHAR NAYLOR LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST 25 W MAIN ST ASSISTANT HABITAT DIRECTOR PO BOX 4249 AUBURN WA 98001 WATER QUALITY PROGRAM MGR FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 ksnvder char. na for u allu tribe.com basbur lakehaven.or -_auburnwa.gov JAMES IRISH KENT HALE MIKE BULZOMI SOUND TRANSIT SOUND TRANSIT SOUND TRANSIT iames.irish soundtransit.or kent.hale soundtransit.or mike.buizoml@soundtransit.org JERRY STEELE LAND USE SVC KCDDES CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS COMCAST CABLE COMM 35030 SE DOUGLAS ST # 210 23315 66T" AVE S 4020 AUBURN WAY N SNOQUALMIE WA 98065-9266 KENT WA 98032 AUBURN WA 98002-1315 r DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 FederalWawww.cit offederalwa .cam DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, 1 Rmha�� hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Was ington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ® posted to or at each of the attached addresses on har C� 2019. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\201 1\1 1-102869-00-UP Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Pasting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 It Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\201 1\1 1-102869-00-UP Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc 4011! CITY Federal of Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) SDA Hispanic Church - File No: 18-105081-00-SE Proposal: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements on an existing building pad. Proponent: WWC of SDA / Eric Davis, 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Location of Proposal: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2019. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 8`' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Doc ID 78926 18-105081-00-SE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Ken Spurrell, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Federal Way Mirror a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Federal Way Mirror has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Federal Way Mirror (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, (Ad #850247) a: Public Notice Published 1 time(s) beginning on 03/29/2019 and ending on 03/29/2019. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $104.45. Ken Spurrell Legal Advertising Representative, Federal �Ary Mirror Subscribed and sworn to me this 29th day �* � q 19. �= 1PN IROop r'q�� "yam •� Allen F. Nemec,,Notary Public for the %1p AeamResiding in Tacoma, Washington City of Federal Way -Comm Devel 02 ( 2 FWM850247 �l��� F - s, Federal lay J NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFI- CANCE(ONS) SDA Hispanic Church - File No: 18-105081-004E Proposal: Construct a 12.894 square foot church building and associated site improvements on an existing building pad. Proponent: WWC of SDA 1 Eric Davis, 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South. Federal Way Location of Proposal: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835- 2652 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse Impact on the environment, and an environmental Impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after re- view of a compteted environmental checklist, Fed- eral Way Comprehensive Plan, and other munlelpat policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority un- der the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to ROW 43.31C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action Is available to the public upon request from the De- parlment of Community DevelopmenL Thls DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2019. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determinatlon may file an appeal. Anyone may ap- peal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2019, by a written letter staling the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on March 29, 20194850247 4ik CIT Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) SDA Hispanic Church - File No: 18-105081-00-SE Proposal: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements on an existing building pad. Proponent: WWC of SDA / Eric Davis, 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Location of Proposal: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2019. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. 18-105081-00-SE Doc ID 78926 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on March 29, 2019. Proposed SDA 18-105081-00-SE Doc ID 78926 Vicinity Map 18-105081-00-SE Doc I D. CITY OF� Federal Way Community Development Department NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: SDA Hispanic Church Project Description: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements, on an existing building pad. Applicant Agent: Brent Lambeth, Architect, 355 NW 480' Street, Seattle, WA 98107 Project Location: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003, Parcel ID 215484-0010 Date of Application: October 30, 20181010 - 1 Date Determined Complete: November 27, 2018 Date of Notice of Application: December 7, 2018 0051. Public Comments Due: December 26, 2018 r Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: The applicant requests a Use Process III decision (file #18-105080-UP) issued by the Director of Community Development pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65. Additional permits and/or approvals in conjunction with the Use Process III decision include a threshold determination pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules WAC 197-11 (file #18-105081- SE), Concurrency (file #18-105083-CN). Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Environmental Checklist, and Preliminary Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Transportation Management Plan, Trip Generation and Parking Assessment. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: FWRC Title 14 "Environmental Policy"; Title 16 "Surface Water Management"; and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWRC, 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and the Public Works Department Development Standards. Public Comment & Appeals: The official project file is available for public review at the Community Development Department (address below). Any person may submit written comments on the Use Process III application to the Director of Community Development by December 26, 2018. Only the applicant, persons who submit written documents to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the director's decision. Availability of File and Environmental Documents: The official project file and referenced environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community Development Department, 33325 8t' Avenue South, 2nd Floor, Federal Way, WA 98003. 18-105080-UP Doc ID 78544 Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com 18-105080-UP Doc ID 78544 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A4k 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www.cityotfederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 11 l l i, f! L+ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ZNotice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or 4sted to or at each of the attached addresses on lcemk?4- 6 2018. Project Name File Number(s) Signature �ifSKKXLl11� (,�u� 12�� 20 Date K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc A%k� CITY OF Federal Way Community Development Department NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: SDA Hispanic Church Project Description: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements, on an existing building pad. Applicant Agent: Brent Lambeth, Architect, 355 NW 48"' Street, Seattle, WA 98107 Project Location: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003, Parcel ID 215484-0010 Date of Application: October 30, 2018 JC CS.C' '•J Date Determined Complete: November 27, 2018 Date of Notice of Application: December 7, 2018 g a uspo Public Comments Due: December 26, 2018 a�J Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: The applicant requests a Use Process III decision (file #18-105080-UP) issued by the Director of Community Development pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65. Additional permits and/or approvals in conjunction with the Use Process III decision include a threshold determination pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules WAC 197-11 (file #18-105081- SE), Concurrency (file #18-105083-CN). Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Environmental Checklist, and Preliminary Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Transportation Management Plan, Trip Generation and Parking Assessment. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: FWRC Title 14 "Environmental Policy"; Title 16 "Surface Water Management"; and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWRC, 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and the Public Works Department Development Standards. Public Comment & Appeals: The official project file is available for public review at the Community Development Department (address below). Any person may submit written comments on the Use Process III application to the Director of Community Development by December 26, 2018. Only the applicant, persons who submit written documents to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the director's decision. Availability of File and Environmental Documents: The official project file and referenced environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community Development Department, 33325 8`h Avenue South, 2nd Floor, Federal Way, WA 98003. 18-105080-UP Doc ID 78544 Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com 18-105080-UP Doc ID 78544 CITY OF Federal Way Ak DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cif Offederalwa .cam DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, E. Tina Piet _ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: 0 Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determinafion of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was O emailed ❑ mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on December 5 2078. Project Name File Number(s) 1 Signature Date November 5 2n i o CAUsers\tinap\Desktop\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 12/5/2018 10:24:00 AM -�kCITY OF Federal Way Community Development Department NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: SDA Hispanic Church Project Description: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements, on an existing building pad. Applicant Agent: Brent Lambeth, Architect, 355 NW 48"' Street, Seattle, WA 98107 Project Location: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003, Parcel ID 215484-0010 Date of Application: October 30, 2018 Date Determined Complete: November 27, 2018 Date of Notice of Application: December 7, 2018 Public Comments Due: December 26, 2018 Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: The applicant requests a Use Process III decision (file #18-105080-UP) issued by the Director of Community Development pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65. Additional permits and/or approvals in conjunction with the Use Process III decision include a threshold determination pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules WAC 197-11 (file #18-105081-SE), Concurrency (file #18-105083-CN). Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Environmental Checklist, and Preliminary Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Transportation Management Plan, Trip Generation and Parking Assessment. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: FWRC Title 14 "Environmental Policy"; Title 16 "Surface Water Management"; and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWRC, 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and the Public Works Department Development Standards. Public Comment & Appeals: The official project file is available for public review at the Community Development Department (address below). Any person may submit written comments on the Use Process III application to the Director of Community Development by December 26, 2018. Only the applicant, persons who submit written documents to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the director's decision. Availability of File and Environmental Documents: The official project file and referenced environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community Development Department, 33325 8"' Avenue South, 2°d Floor, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com 18-105080-UP Doc ID 78544 Tina Piet From: Ken Spurrell <legals@tacomadailyindex.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2018 10:06 AM To: Tina Piety Subject: Re: Legal Notice Attachments: image001.jpg Confirming receiving notice to pub in the Federal Way Mirror on Dec 7th. thanks Ken Ken Spurrell Publisher Direct: 253-232-5219 Internal: 15001 Fax: 253-627-2253 15 Oregon Ave, Suite 101, Tacoma, WA 98409 IHI Sound Publishing Man Print Rates Online Rated Media Kit Sound Info On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 9:58 AM Tina Piety <Ting! Piet ac cityoffedgralwa om> wrote: Hello, Please publish the attached legal notice (SDA Hispanic Church NOA, 18-105080-UP) in the Federal Way Mirror in Friday's (12/7/2018) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. This is for the Community Development account 83722477. Thank you, Tina E. Tina Piety, CAP -OM Administrative Assistant li 1 Community Development Department 33325 80' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 w ww, c i tyo feed era l way.co ij 41k CITY Federale. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityc)ffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION i, E. Tina Piety hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was ❑x emailed ❑ mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on March 27 2019. Project Name SDA Hispanic Church File Number(s) 18-105081-00-SE Signature f Date March 27, 2019 CITY OF A§� Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) SDA Hispanic Church - File No: 18-105081-00-SE Proposal: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements on an existing building pad. Proponent: WWC of SDA / Eric Davis, 32229 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Location of Proposal: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.31C.I 10. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2019. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on May 3, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on March 29, 2019. 18-105081-00-SE Doc ID 78926 Tina Piet From: Ken Spurrell <legals@tacomadailyindex.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 9:31 AM To: Tina Piety Cc: Jim Harris Subject: Re: Legal Notice Received, thank you. Ken Spurrell Publisher Direct: 253-232-5219 Internal: 15001 Fax: 253-627-2253 15 Oregon Ave, Suite 101, Tacoma, WA 98409 E Sound Publishing Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit Sound Inf9 On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 9:07 AM Tina Piety <Tina.Pie Qcit effederalwa .camp wrote: Hello Please publish the attached legal notice (SDA Hispanic Church DNS, 18-105081-SE) in the Federal Way Mirror's Friday (3/29/2019) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. This is for the Community Development account 83722477. Thank you, Tina E. Tina Piety, CAP -OM Administrative Assistant II Federal Way Community Development Department 1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way Federal Way Fax 98003-6325 253-835-2700; Fax 253-835-2709 Centered on Opportunity wwu.cil�[r1t�r3erai�va .enm CAPACITYRESERVE CERTIFICATE (CRC) This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is made this 2e day ofMay 2079 by the City of Federal Way (COFW), a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the "City"). WHEREAS, the developer intends to develop the property described as SDA flip anic Church reviewed ' under City file CN Number(s) I8-105083-00-CN (hereinafter called the "development"); and WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A requires that the City adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of the development are made concurrent with the development; and WHEREAS, the City adopted its comprehensive plan in November 1995; and WHEREAS, Chapter 19 of the COFW Revised Code was amended by the creation of Chapter 19.90 Division III on June 10, 2006 by Ordinance 06-5.25 effective January 1, 2007; and NOW, THEREFORE, a concurrency certificate is issued for the development of JZ894 SF church based on the facts and conditions set forth herein. Development Parameters This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is based on the following development: Development type: Church Development size: 12,894 SF Church Property address: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South Federal Way, WA Parcel No. (s): 215484-0010 Number of New PM Peak Hour Vehicles Trips Generated: 6 Validity of Coneurrency Determination This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid only for the specific development approval consistent with the development parameters and the City file number contained within this certificate. If the development is changed, expired, cancelled or withdrawn, it will be subjected to reevaluation for concurrency purposes. Terms of the Capacity Reserve Certificate This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid until the underlying development permit expires, is withdrawn or cancelled, whichever occurs first. Approved By: r �>� Date: 0 9 -T,l 2015 Printed Name: Richard A. Perez P.E Title: City Traffic Engineer CITY OF ., Federal Wav Centered on Opportune fs APPLICATION (NO(S): Project Name Property AddressfLocation Parcel Number(s) Project Description Public Works Department CITY CENTER CONCURRENCY TEST SUMMARY 33325 8th Avenue South 1'edern] Way WA 98003-6325 251435-27otl; Fax 253-835-2609 wwtv.c i tyo ftedern I wa y.com 18-105083-00-CN Date: May 28, 2019 SDA Hispanic Church 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South 215484-0010 Construct 12,894 SF (328 seat capcaity) church Based on the traffic distribution, intersections impacted by at least one or more evening peak hour trips were analyzed for meeting concurrency LOS standards (v/c less than 1.1) consistent with the City of Federal Way Transportation Concurrency Management code as described in FWRC 19.90. Table I below shows a summary of the LOS analysis for the study intersections with V/C ratio at the anticipated build -out year. For all other study intersections and detailed LOS calculation, please contact the Public Works Traffic Division. NoIc: Any Chan P es to tlic d e velop ment p ro'CCI tlt.iI ree uirc additi na I red5 w Will he billed on an hourl ' basil Table 1: City Center Zone Concurrency Level of Service (LOS) Intersection 2021 Background Conditions LOS Standard Met? 2021 With Project Conditions LOS Standard Met? ID : Zone "North -South Street ;East-West Street V/C V/C 2549 CC ; l4 Av S 1S 312 St 0.41 0.41 0.77 0.28 i rl :2550 CC Pacific Hwy S S 312 St _.....-_ y� -l� . .- 2552 CC t20 Av S 'S 31L 2 St -w 0.77 .2554_ CC 5�23 Av S TS 3l2 St _0.28� 0.38 0.38 0.20 2652 1 CC :20 Av S 'S 314 St S 314 St 2654 1 -CC tt 3--A-v--S _0.20 _ 0.20 0.20 4 0.67 T 0.39 _ _ _ 2750_ CC Pt aciYic Hwy S �S 316 St _ 0.67 w 2752 L CC t2y20 Av S IS 316 St - 0.39---- ^-�� 2754 ; CC .123 Av S !S 316 St _.._._. r123 0.27- - 0.27 -_- 0.71 _ 0.76 0.79 0.75 0.85 0.77 - 0.72 2855 1 CC Av S !S 317 St _ 3048 ; CC I I ] PIS IS 320 St 0.76 3050 j CC ;Pacific Hwy S ;S 320 St- � 0.79 3052 ; CC�� 20 Av S ;S 320 St 0.75� -�� _- 3055 CC 23 Av S W ;S 320 St -� 0.85 _ 3056 CC !Gateway Blvd S ;S 320 St ... 0.77 .... 3057 CC I I-5 SB Ram 'SS 320 St 0.72 3255CC 123rd Ave S IS 322nd St 3348 CC-' I 1 Pal S IS 324 St ' 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 3350 CC ;Pacific Hwy S :S 324 St 0.76 _ 0.76 CC Average v/c Ratio = 0.52 •1' 0.52 ;y All signalized City Center intersections met LOS standards: Test Result: , identify intersections and possible mitigation: I'or:kI:5I1 U-1v Y'es FL-V07:11 Passed: Fail: Test performed by: Sarady Long Date L:\DEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\2018 CN Project\18-105083-CN SDA Hispanic Church\LOS Summary_SDA Church 111 CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity APPLICATION (NO(S): Project Name Property Address/Location Parcel Number(s) Project Description CITYWIDE CONCURRENCY TEST SUMMARY 18-105083-00-CN Public Works Department 33325 8tb Avenue South Fedq'al ►k.ay WA 98003-6325 253-835-27W; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com Date: May 28, 2019 SDA Hispanic Church 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South 215484-0010 Construct 12.894 SF 1328 seat caocaity) church Based on the traffic distribution, intersections impacted by at least one or more evening peak hour trips were analyzed for meeting concurrency LOS standards (v/c less than 1.2 for signalized and 1.0 for unsignalized) consistent with the City of Federal Way Transportation Coneurrency Management code as described in FWRC 19.90. Table 1 below shows a summary of the LOS analysis for the study intersections with V/C ratio above 0.70 at the anticipated build -out year. Where a performance measure does not apply to the entire intersection, the table shows the measure for the worst movement of the intersection. For all other study intersections and detailed LOS calculation, please contact the Public Works Traffic Division. Note: A n v changes to the development project the:I rcciuire additional reviciv will be hilted on an houriv basis. Table 1: Concurrency Level of Service (LOS) Intersection 2021 Background LOS 2021 With Project i LOS Conditions Standard Met? Conditions V/C ; Standard l Met? ID Zone tNorth-South Street tEast-West Street V/C 3058 [I-S_NB Ramer .S 320 St 0.68 !' 0.68 l" V. _ 3060 1 132 Av S _ _ _ S 320 St — 0.80_ _ 0.80 0.81_ 0.81 . 4 1. • :Y 3061 1 i Weyerhaeuser Wy S— =S 320 St All intersections met the City of Federal Way LOS standards: Ycs \E5 L:\DEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\2018 CN Project\18-105083-CN_SDA Hispanic Church\LOS Summary_SDA Church 1/1 % Jim Harris From: Brent Lambeth <brent@blamarchitect.com> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 9:58 AM To: Jim Harris Cc: Kevin Peterson Subject: Re: SDA Church shared parking Attachments: WWSDA - Closing Docs from Chicago Title (2017-06-27).pdf Jim, This is what I got from the lawyer who negotiated that purchase of the land. If you read pages 11-14 of our closing documents, the parking easement is addressed. Will this work for you? Thanks, Brent Lambeth, R.A. Principal Brent Lambeth, Architect 355 NW 48th St. Seattle, WA 98107 P. 303.818.9430 E. brent@.blamarchitect.com On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:24 AM Jim Harris <Jim.Harris@cityoffederalway.com> wrote: Brent: Can you provide me some documentation that the parking is shared by lots 1 and 2 of the Lot G Binding Site Plan rec no 20090921001612. The Heath parking assessment references the shared parking for multi -tenants. We asked for documentation of the shared parking with our pre -application comment letter. I do not see any reference to shared parking on the Lot G Binding site plan. The binding site plan for Lot G page 3 references a reciprocal access easement over the drive areas of lots 1 and 2 for the benefit of each lot. However, the binding site plan does not identify shared/reciprocal parking. I also do not see reference to shared parking in the submitted title report. Is there something in the private covenants regarding shared/reciprocal parking? Please provide me with some documentation for the shared parking. . Thanks, Jim Jim Harris Senior Planner a"of Federal Way 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2652 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com Office Hours Mon - Thur, 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM or by appointment CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON June 27, 2017 Barbara J. Prowant Prowant Law, PLLC 4707 515' Place SW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98116 RE: Buyer: Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists Sellers: Langley Commercial Investments Ltd. Escrow Number: 0095595-06 Dear Ms. Prowant: The above referenced transaction has been completed and enclosed you will find the following: • Final Buyer's Settlement Statement • Copy of recorded Bargain and Sale Deed • Copy of recorded Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Access Agreement • Original Bill of Sale • Original Seller's Closing Certificate ■ Copy of Purchaser's Closing Certificate • Copy of IRS Form 8288 Should you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance on this transaction or in the future, please do not hesitate to contact Mike Costello, Sincerely, Kacie Coselman Commercial Escrow Assistant 701 Fifth Avenue • Suite 2700 • Seattle, WA 98104 . 206.628.5666 • 800.627.0530 www.SeattleNCS.ctic.com Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700, Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206)628-5666 } FAX: (206)628-9737 e FINAL BUYER'S STATEMENT Escrow Number: 0095595-06 Settlement Date: June 23, 2017 Escrow Officer: Michael Costello Disbursement Date: June 23, 2017 Buyer: Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Advej-,tists, a Washington nonprofit corporation 32229 Weyerhauser Way South Federal Way, WA 98001 Seller: #20015 27 60thAve. 1Commercial Investments Sur ey BC V3R ONBritish 9 Canada Columbia company Property: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South Federal Way, WA 98001 Lot(s): 1 East Campus Terrace - Lot G Tax/Map ID(s): FINANCIAL CONSIDERATION Contract sales price Earnest Money Deposit Buyer's funds to close Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, a Washington nonprofit corporation Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists, a Washington nonprofit corporation PRORATIONSIADJUSTM NTS 06 23/17-06I30117 2017 First Half ProPeIsy Tax Proration Semi -Annually at $5,419.07 TITLE & ESCROW CHARGES Escrow Fees Subtotals ($5419.07 / 181 X 8 days) Chicago Title Company of Washington TOTALS SAVE THIS STATEMENT FOR INCOME TAX PURPOSES $ DEBIT $ CREDIT 650,000.00 10,000.00 641, 368.04 239.52 1,128.52 651,368.04 651, 368.04 651,368.04 651,368.04 20170623001198 001 0 CHICAGO TITLE INS. CO, REF# 5 -0 Recording requested by and when recorded mall to: Prowant Law, PLLC Attn: Barbara J. Prowant, Esq. 4707 510 Place SW, Sulte 200 Seattle, WA 98116 Document Title: Grantor: Grantee: Legal Description: Abbreviated Legal Description: Parcel Identification No.: 20170623001 i98 PAGE-001 OFes 12.3" B0 KING COUNT 7 E2872714 06/23/2017 15:36 KING COUNTY, WA TAX ss11575.00 SALE s850 *0-00 PAGE-001 OF 001 Statutory Warranty Deed Langley Commercial Investments Ltd. Western Washington Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists Full legal description on Page 1 Lot 1, East Campus Terrace - Lot G, Volume 25 of Plats, Pages 59-63, King County, Washington 215484-0010-07 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED The Grantor, LANGLEY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS LTD., a British Columbia company, for good and valuable consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants against all who claim by, through, or under the Grantor to the Grantee, WESTERN WASHINGTON CORPORATION OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS, a Washington nonprofit corporation, that certain real estate situated in the City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, together with all rights and privileges appurtenant thereto, described as follows: Lot 1, East Campus Terrace - Lot G (Binding Site Plan), according to the plat thereof recorded In Volume 252 of plats, pages 59 through 63, Inclusive, In King County, Washington. SUBJECT TO the exceptions to title described on Schedule i attached hereto. Dated: June � 2017 GRANTOR: LANGLEY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS LTD., a British Columbia company r� By; Emily Dodcsteader, Authorized Signatory 1 GMA, Pehr=1= 016 Vamt Puod SWgWoo q\.� Vj*nnty DamMOP 062117)4= 20170623001198.002 CANADA ) ss. PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA } I certify that I know or have satisfactory+ evidence that Emily Docksteader Is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this Instrument, on oath stated that said person was audwrIzed to execute the Instrument and acknowledged It as the Authortzed Signatory of LANGLEY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS LTD., a British Columbia company, to be the free and voluntary act of such company for the uses and purposes mentioned in the Instrument. Dated this L' - day of June, 2017. :T (c AIWO.5 er L - fW-0 (print or type name) NOTARY PUBLIC In and for the Province of British Columbia, residing at —1tAfre.uT A lk1 YYIn end tOr ft PrvWa 01 &-tt3h Cv� 200.15127100 Avenue Spy BC, M Qif9 Tel: (604)338.8871 F= (644)33W76 2 G:%W , pdffuon.0MVMfi v 2a prod WwrA' bdM W 06a17)A= 20170623001198.003 SCHEDULE 1 PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS i. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted In a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District, a municipal corporation Purpose: Right of way for water facilities and all appurtenances related thereto Recording Date: September 3, 1999 Recording No.: 19990903000828 Affects: An Easterly portion of said premises; and other property 2. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted In a document: Granted to: City of Federal Way, a municipal corporation Purpose: Ingress and egress for inspection of and to reasonably monitor the stormwater treatment and detention facilities Recording Date: September 16, 1999 Recording No.: 19990916001926 Affects: Said premises and other property Said instrument contains provisions for bearing the cost of maintenance, repair or reconstruction of the facilities by the grantor of said document, 3. Reciprocal driveway and utility easement and shared cost agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: The Quadrant Corporation, a Washington corporation And: Capital One Bank Recording Date; December 27, 2001 Recording No.: 20011227000839 Said easement/agreement has been modified by first amendment thereto recorded under recording number 20051221000599. 4. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District, a municipal corporation Purpose: Water and/or sewer facilities and all appurtenances related thereto Recording Date: May 19, 2006 Recording No.: 20060519000191 Affects: A Westerly portion of said premises and other property lying within a strip of land 30 feet in width Schedule 1-1 20170623001198.004 Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights Incidental thereto, as granted In a document: Granted to: Puget Sound Energy, Inc., a Washington corporation Purpose: One or more utility systems for transmission, distributlon and sale of gas and electricity Recording Date: October 16, Z006 Recording No.: 20061016001372 Affects: A portion of herein described premises Easement agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between; Esther L. Porter, a married woman, dealing with her sole and separate property, 3ud1th Schneider, a married woman dealing with her sole and separate property, Esther L. Porter and Judith Schneider, trustees of the Siegbert and Ruth Klebe Family Trust dated 1-24-91 And: Weyerhaeuser Company, a Washington corporation Recording Date: April 9, 2007 Recording No.: Regarding: 20070409000213 Establishment of power easement and related covenants and provisions 7. Mineral Reservation contained In deed from Weyerhaeuser Company, a Washington corporation: Recording Date: May 21, 1996 Recording No.: 9605210333 8. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictlons, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of Income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on Plat of East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 (Binding Site Plan): Recording No: 19990916001397 An easement delineated on said plat has been modified by amendment and release document recorded under recording number 20060411001775. 9. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth In applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document: Recording Date: September 16, 1999 Retarding No.; 19990916001928 Schedule 1-2 20170623001198.005 10. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, If any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, famillal status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth In applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction Is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on Plat of East Campus Terrace -Lot G (Binding Site Plan): Recording No: 20090921001612 11. Terms, conditions and provlslons contained in City of Federal Way Ordinance Number 94-219: Recording Date: October 26, 1994 Recording No.: 9410260933 Said ordinance/agreement has been modified by first amendment thereto recorded under recording number 20030513002214 12. Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: Lakehaven Utility District, a municipal corporation And: The Quadrant Corporation Recording Date: December 22, 1999 Recording No.: 19991222001643 Regarding: Construction of certain sewer and water mains and appurtenances and payment of costs related thereto 13. Release or damage agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: Panattoni Development Co. And: Lakehaven Utility District Recording Date: July 18, 2007 Recording No.: 20070718001857 Releasing Lakehaven Utility District from all future claims for damages resulting from: Non -conforming side sewer connection 14. Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: Panattoni Development Company LLC And: Lakehaven Utility District Recording Date: July 18, 2007 Recording No.: 20070718001860 Regarding: Joint private sewer main; maintenance provisions and restrictions related thereof Schedule 1-3 20170623001198.006 15 16. 17 18. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted in deed: Grantee: King County Recording Date: September 15, 1978 Recording No.: 7809150862 Terms and conditions of notice of charges by water, sewer, and/or storm and surface water utilities, recorded under recording number 8905120210. Any rights, Interests, or claims which may aria by reason of the following matters disclosed by survey by CentrePointe Consultants, Inc., P.S., dated June 12, 2017, under Job No. 3707. Matters Shown: Existence of concrete steps and handrails providing access between the land and property adjoining on the Northwest, and any rights pertaining thereto. Second half 2017 taxes and charges, a lien not yet due or payable. 19. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, If any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, famllial status, marital status, disablilty, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender Identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth In applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction Is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in Declaration of Reciprocal Easements and Access Agreement: Recording Date: June Z 3 2017 do it R % Recording No.: 2�� 1 ?j2 'o- Schedule 1-4 20170623001197.001 /6 CHICAGO TITLE i S. CO. RAF# 5 S�l��pl; When Recofved, Retum to: Marc T. Kretsclmer Fikso Kretschmer Smith Dixon Ormseth PS 2025 First Avenue, Sulte 1130 Seattle, WA 98121 Related Documents: N/A Ell 1 11 201706: 01197 CHICAGO TITLE EAS 181.00 PA eel OF 016 06/23/2017 16:37 KING COUNTY, WA Grantor: Langley Commercial Investments Ltd. Grantee: Langley Commercial Investments Ltd. Lots 1 & 2, East Campus Terrace — Lot G; Legal Description Volume 25 of Plats, Pages 59-63, King County, Washington (abbreviated): ® Additional on Exhibit A and Exhibit B Assessor's Tax Lot 215484-0010 and 215484-0020 Numbers: DECLARATION OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS AND ACCESS AGREEMENT (Lots 1 and 2, Parcel G, East Campus Corporate Park) THIS DECLARATION OF RECIPROCAL EASEMENTS AND ACCESS AGREEMENT ("Declaration"') Is made as of June ;3�_, 2017 rEFfective Date"j, by LANGLEY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS LTD., a British Columbia company ["'Langley"), for the benefit of all present and future owners of Lots i and 2, Parcel G, East Campus Corporate Park (each, an "Owner" and together the "Owners'). RECITALS A. Langley is the owner of that real property legally described on ExhlUt attached hereto ("Lot 1"), Langley is also the owner of that real property adjacent to Lot i legally described on Exhib attached hereto ("Lot 21. Lot 1 and Lot 2 are, together, sometimes referred to herein as "Parcel G". B. Lot 2 is Improved with a commercial office building, and Lot 1 is currently used as a parking lot (individually, each a "Lot" and collectively, the "Lots"). C. Langley intends to sell Lot 1, and wishes to establish reciprocal easements over Lots 1 and 2 for their mutual benefit, and to provide for allocation of certain costs relating to the Lots, including but not limited to those costs allocated to Parcel G pursuant to the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Easements & Restrictions Applicable to Quadrant East Campus Corporate Park Parcel I ("Master CCf4Rs"). 1 G:\Ash, PawV071.003\2016 Vamnt Pared SakeVkc Of Re* Easwwft And Am= Ag\WWSOA . Oedmratlon Of Reopraml Em&Twd Aid A== Agent (2017-06-21) PurchaserMOCt EXCISE TAY NOT REQUIRED King4!5& DeputyyBn 20170623001197.002 NOW, THEREFORE, for the mutual and reciprocal benefit and protection of all present and future Owners of the Lots, Langley as the fee simple owner of the Lots declares that (I) the Lots shall be sold, conveyed, transferred, leased, encumbered and mortgaged, subject to this Declaration, (li) this Declaration shall Inure to the benefit of and shall burden the Lots and shall run with the land, and (iii) this Declaration shall apply to and be binding upon all of the parties having or acquiring any right, title or interest In the Lots or any part thereof and their grantees, heirs, successors and assigns, for the term specified In Section 12.D9 below. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS 1.01 Definitions. As used In this Declaration, the following terms shall have the following meanings; "Access Facilities" shall mean all roads, driveways, parking lots, aisle ways and sidewalks within Common Area on the Lots providing access from public right of ways to the Lots as well as access from the Lots to the Buildings, Parking Facilities and Common Areas on each Lot "Allocated Share" shall mean the ratio that the proportionate square footage of a Lot bears to the total square footage of all the Lots within Parcel G. The Allocated Shares are set forth on Exhibit C. This ratio shall establish the participation of each Lot in Common Expenses, as that term Is defined in the Master CC13tRs, and other matters of common interest. "Buildings" shall mean the buildings now or hereafter constructed on the Lots, provided, however, that maintenance sheds, trash enclosures and similar standalone structures intended to support the operation or maintenance of the Buildings or Common Area shall not be considered Buildings for purposes of this Declaration. "Building Area" shall mean those portions of the Lots from time to time occupied by Buildings (including truck docks, compactor pads, utilities pads, pallet storage areas, receiving areas and similar service areas and facilities constructed solely for the use of such Buildings) as the same may change from time to time as provided in this Declaration. "Common Area" shall mean all portions of the Lots except the Building Areas, as the same may change from time to time as provided In this Declaration, which Common Area includes, without limitation, Parking Areas and Access Facilities. 'Exclusive Utilities* shall mean those Utilities that exclusively and solely serve the Buildings on one Lot. "Existing Utilities" means any and all Utilities located in the Lots as of the date of this Declaration, some of which are governed by separate documents of record. "Future Utilities" means any and all Utilities installed in the Common Area after the date of this Declaration. "Governmental Authority" shall mean any governmental authority, agency, department, commission, bureau, board, innstrumentaGty, court or quasi -governmental authority of the United States of America, the State of Washington or any political subdivisions thereof. "L21" is defined in Recital Paragraph B above. 2 G*", Pete WIAO312O16 Veamt Pad WDK Or kwip Eawnetts And Acmw AO\WWSDA - Veda. tbn Or Rlopoca Ea met Ard Amass Agnt (2O17-06-22) PudRW.0= 20170623001197.003 "Lot l" is defined in Recital Paragraph A above. "Lot 2" Is defined in Recital Paragraph A above. "miglIgg cig" shall mean any first mortgage, deed of trust or similar lien which has priority over all other mortgages, deeds of trust and similar liens and which is recorded, secures the payment of any indebtedness and encumbers all or any part of a Lot, or any Interest therein. "Mortgagee" shall mean the holder of any Mortgage. "Ojeratfon Facilib-e'shall mean the trash enclosure located on Lot 1, as shown on the Site Plan, and the landscape irrigation lines and equipment located on Lot 1 which services both Lots. "Owner'shall mean the then owner of fee simple title to any Lot; provided, however, if any such owner of record flee simple title leases the entire Lot to another person or entity for a term of 50 years or more pursuant to a ground lease, which ground lease or a memorandum thereof Is recorded, then until the expiration or termination of such ground lease, "Owner" shall instead mean the then - current tenant under such ground lease. "Parking Arm" shall mean any portion of the Common Area now or hereafter paved and striped for vehicle parking. 'Permit " shall mean, with respect to each Owner, (i) the Owner, (ti) the Owner's contractors, agents, tenants, subtenants, concessionaires, and licensees, and (W) the contractors, agents, tenants, subtenants, concessionaires, licensees, employees, patients, dients, customers, visitors and Invltees of any of the parties In the preceding clauses (1) and (ii). "Site Plan" shall mean the site plan attached as Exhibit O hereto. It Is acknowledged that the actual location and configuration of Improvements in the Lots, once constructed, may vary from what Is shown on the Site Plan. utilii ems" shall mean the water, sanitary sewer, storm water drainage and detention, gas, electric, telephone, cable television, fiberoptic, communications, and other utility Ilnes, mains, pipes, conduits, and wires, and related equipment and facilities providing uullty services for any Buildings or other improvements In the Lots. "utility Ary_" shall mean the areas within Common Area on the Lots, now or hereafter containing Utilities, the general locations of some of which, as of the date hereof, are shown on the Site Plan. Provider* shall mean any company providing gas, electricity, water, sewer, telephone, cable television, fiber optics or other presently existing or hereafter created or Invented utility services to the Lots or any part thereof. ARTICLE II pRANT QUASIEMEN 2.01 . Langley grants and declares to and for the benefit of the owners, a perpetual nonexclusive right and easement on, over and across the Access Facilities, fur use by the Owners and their Permittees for pedestrian and vehicular access to the Buitdings on their Lots. G:yW4 peter�NA1.fA Z016 Vac" pared Salelf)ec of Redp EnMne+a And A� VwN5oA - Dedbradw Or aedp od E�wit A d Amess (200-05-71) hadesd bm 20170623001197 004 2.02 Parkins Easernents. Langley grants and declares to and for the benefit of the Owners, a perpetual nonexclusive right and easement on, over and across the entire Parking Area far parking by the Owners and their Permlttees in connectlon with or inddental to their use of the Lots. 2.03 Eristing Utility and Operation Facilities Easement. Langley grants and declares to and for the benefit of the Owners, a perpetual nonexclusive right, and easement on, over and across the Common Areas for constructing, reconstructing, operating, using, maintaining, repairing and replacing the Existing Utilities and Operation Facilities In the Common Area. Nothing herein will limit the right of an Owner to construct and install surface paving facilities, walkways, driveways, landscaping, lighting and similar above ground improvements in the Utility Areas and any underground sprinkling system therein, so long as such improvements do not unreasonably Interfere with access to and use of substantial portions of the Existing Utilities and Operation Facilities. Each Owner shall be responsible for the repair and replacement of any such improvements that may be damaged as a result of such Owner accessing the Existing Utilities and Operation Facilities, 2.04 Future Utilities Easement. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Section 2.04, Langley hereby grants and declares to and for the benefit of each Owner a nonexclusive right and easement for Future Utilities. Each Owner covenants that it will grant the other Owner (and/or their Utility Provider) such additional non-exclusive easements for Future Udildes through the Common Area located on its Lot as such other Owner may reasonably require for Its Lot. Prior to commencement of Installation or construction of a new utility on an Owner's Lot by the other Owner, the Installing Owner shall first obtain written approval from the granting Owner and the Utility Provider, if any, that is intended to be a beneficiary of the proposed utility easement of (1) all plans and specifications for such installation and construction, (ii) the proposed location of the new utility, (ill) the proposed timing for the utility installation work, (tv) the proposed allocation of maintenance costs and responsibilities for the new utility, and (v) the proposed form of utility easement agreement. The granting Owner shall not unreasonably withhold, condition or delay its approval. The installing Owner shall use reasonable efforts to locate any new utility underground and either along or near the boundaries of the granting Owner's Lot or ftse areas already occupied by other Utilities. Prior to commencing Installation and construction of the new utility, the Installing Owner (and/or the Utility Provider if applicable) and the granting Owner shall, at the expense of the installing Owner, prepare, execute and cause to be recorded a new easement agreement governing only that new utility easement, which shall be between only those parties whose Lots are benefited or burdened by the new utility easement, and which shall exclusively and separately govern such new utility easement so that this Declaration shall have no further force or effect with respect to such new utility easement. A granting Owner shall, If requested, use reasonable and diligent efforts to cause any Mortgagee with a monetary lien encumbering Its Lot to subordinate its lien or encumbrance to the lien of the new utility easement. 2.05 MAIi2te13ance Fpknment. Langley hereby grants and declares to and for the benefit of each Owner a nonexclusive right and easement to enter upon and temporarily occupy Common Area on its Lot and on other Lots to maintain, repair or replace Access Facilities, Parking Areas, Operation Facilities and Utilities in accordance with this Declaration. Any Owner exercising Its rights under this Section 2.05: (1) shall use reasonable efforts to minimize the impact on other Access Facilities, Panting Areas, Operation Facilities and Utilities; (ii) shall keep the maintenance or repair area in a neat, dean, safe and secure condition during its work; and (lii) upon completion of the maintenance or repair work, shall leave the affected Common Area in a condition that Is equal or better than the condition of such Common Area prior to commencement of the maintenance or repair work, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 2.06 Minor Encroachment Easements. Each Lot and each Owner shall have the benefit of, and each Lot and Owner shall be burdened by and subject to, a nonexclusive easement In, on, over and under the Lot neighboring Its Lot for roof and building overhangs, building support columns, canopies, 4 G:V^ PdWJ= r.00au0re vaca,a P" SNOOK a R" r WnM AMP== AMWWSDA - oeurabM Of nenvoa M=nvt Intl AQ= Aymt (?017-06-2i) rloC RW.D= 20170623001197.005 eaves, foundations, slabs, footings, staircases, loading areas, pillars, signs and other similar minor encroachments. 2.07 Duration of Easements. Unless otherwise specifically stated, all easements created hereby shall be perpetual so long as this Declaration remains in effect, In the event of any damage, dest vction, or demolition of any Building or other improvement benefited or burdened by any easement created under this Article II, the easement shall continue even though not currently usable. ARTICLE III PARKIN"ND AGCESS COVENANTS 3.01 No Obstruction5 or interterertce. An Owner shall not engage in any use or activity within the Parking Area or Access Facilities on its Lot which would obstruct or otherwise materially interfere with the ability of the other Owner to use the Parking Area and Access Facilities for access and parking, unless either (1) the prior written consent of the other Owner Is obtained; or (11) redevelopment, construction staging, maintenance, temporary access restrictions, restoration, relocation or reconfiguration is occurring on such Lot In accordance with the express provisions of this Declaration. 3.02 Parking Charges and R29ulation. No charge or fee of any type shall be imposed upon or collected from any user of the Parking Area unless required by any legal Requirements. No Permittee shall be prohibited or prevented from parking a vehicle in the Parking Area, provided that space is available therein and their use of the parking is in connection with or incidental to their use of the Lots for purposes permitted by the applicable zoning. As mutually agreed by the Owners, reasonable limitations may be Imposed as to the length of time for parking use and such limitations may be made in specified areas to promote short term parking near the businesses in the Lots. Each Owner shall have the right to (but shall have no duty to) eject or cause the ejection from the Parking Area of any persons not authorized, empowered or privileged to use the same. An Owner may assign or delegate the right to administer the Parking Area on its Lot to a designee. ARTICLE IV QN AN 0 MAN AGEM ENT OF COmMO 4.01 Use by Permittees. The use of the entire Common Area shall, in each instance, be nonexclusive and for the use and benefit of all Owners and their Permittees. 4.02 ConglMcflon 5titalna. An Owner may temporarily use the Common Area located on its Lot for temporary staging or grading during construction on its Lot. During any such construction, the Owner: (1) shall use reasonable efforts to minimize the impact on other Access Facilities, Parking Areas, Operation Facilities, Utilities and the business operaidons of the tenants and other occupants on the other Lots; (ii) shall keep the construction area in a neat, clean, safe and secure condition; and (III) upon completion of the construction, shall leave any affected Common Area in a condition that is equal or better than the condition of such Common Area prior to commencement of such construction, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 4.03 Mainteirgns2 Qf COMM20 Area, Delegation, Each Owner shall maintain, at its sole cost and expense, the Common Area and Parking Area on Its Lot in good condition, repair and working order. An Owner may retain a property manager to manage the Common Area and Parking Area on its Lot. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the maintenance shall Include the following: (I) Maintaining and repairing the surfaces in a level, smooth and evenly covered condition with the type of surfacing material and striping originally Installed or such substitute 5 G:yAM, vrm12o71.003kX1e vaarrt yard sak\Doc or asic Fssneres And Amm Ag\wwsoA - nedwdJon Of aedvonl EBMTOt And cocas Awre (2017-0b21) Pmhaw.D= 20170623001197.006 therefor as shall in all respects be equal in quality, use and durability; (ii) Removing all papers, debris, filth and refuse and washing or sweeping the area to the extent reasonably necessary to keep the area in a neat, dean and orderly condition, and free of snow and Ice; (ill) Placing, keeping In repair and replacing any necessary appropriate directional signs, markers and lines; (iv) Operating, keeping in repair and replacing when necessary, artificial lighting facilities, If any, as shall be reasonably required; (v) Maintaining any perimeter walls in a good condition and state of repair; and (vi) Maintaining all landscaped areas and making such replacement of shrubs and other landscaping as Is necessary. 4.04 Maiatenar-ce of Utilities. Each Owner shall maintain, at its We cost and expense, the Utilities located on its Lot In good condition, repair and working order; except that responslbihty for maintenance and repair of each Exclusive Utility, regardless of location, will fall upon the Owner receiving the sole benefit from such Exclusive Utility. 4.05 Majrlterlance of Operation Facilities. The Owner on whose Lot the Operation Facilities Is located shall maintain the Operations Facilities on its Lot in good condition, repair and working order and shall be entitled to recover from the other Owner such Owner's Allocated Share of the costs and expenses associated with such operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the Operation Facilities. 4.06 Gove rni Relabon . The Owners will cooperate and join In any and all applications for permits, licenses or other approvals or authorizations required by any governmental unit or other body claiming jurisdiction in connection with any operation, maintenance, repair, use, replacement, construction or reconstruction of the improvements, facilities and equipment subject to the easements created under Article II. 4.07 Not a Public laedlcation. Nothing in the Declaration shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Common Area to the general public or for the general public or for any public purpose whatsoever, it being the Intention of the parties hereto that this Declaration shall be strictly limited to and for the purposes herein expressed. The right of the public or any person to make any use whatsoever of the Common Area or the Lots herein affected, or any portion thereof (other than any use expressly allowed by a written or recorded map, agreement, deed or dedication) is by permission, and subject to the control of the Owners. Notwithstanding any other provisions herein to the contrary, each Owner may periodically restrict ingress and egress from the Common Area In order to prevent a prescriptive easement from arlsing by reason of continued public use. Any restriction on ingress and egress shall be limited to the minimum period necessary to prevent the creation of a prescriptive easement and shall occur at such a time as to have a minimum effect on the operation of the Lots. 6 G:%AA PdarNM71.K 312016 Yarn[ Parad SWOW Of Reap EaMrdM And A=M Ap1W WSDA - D0dWatbn OF PWdv=1 FjM m * Md AwM Ag" (ZD17-WW1) PUPOM A)= 20170623001197.007 ARTICLE V C-0-M MO N E PE NSES AND O H ER CHARC. ES 5.1 Common _Expenses and other Charges. Each Owner covenants to pay when due its Allocated Share of all sums assessed against Parcel G pursuant to the Master CC&Rs, and its Allocated Share of any expenses jointly Incurred for the common benefit of the Lots. ARTICLE VI INDEMNIFICATION 6.01 Inclemnifloton. Subject to the provisions of Section 6.02, each Owner shall indemnify, defend and save the other Owner harmless from and against any and all demand, liability, damage, cost, expense (including reasonable attorneys' fees), cause of action, suit, claim (including mechanic's, materialmen`s or construction liens) or judgment, arising out of the negligent act, negligent omission, willful misconduct or breach of this Declaration by the indemnifying Owner or by any of the Permittees of such indemnifying Owner. An Owner shall not be entitled to the indemnification provided herein for any injury or damage to the extent arising out of the negligent act, negligent omission or willful misconduct of Itself or any of its Permittees. EACH OWNER BY ACQUIRING TITLE TO ITS LOT AND MAKING ITSELF SUBJECT TO THIS DECLARATION EXPRESSLY AND SPECIFICALLY WAIVES ITS IMMUNITY AS AN EMPLOYER UNDER RCW TITLE 51, INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE, WHICH WAIVER IS SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF GIVING FULL FORCE AND EFFECT TO THE FOREGOING INDEMNITY. THIS WAIVER OF IMMUNITY IS NOT INTENDED TO BENEFIT ANY THIRD PARTIES NOT SUBJECT TO THIS DECLARATION. 6.02 Waiver of Subrogglion. Notwithstanding anything in this Declaration to the contrary, each Owner waives its right of recovery, right of subrogation, claims, actions, or causes of action against other Owners for loss or damage to its Lot and the improvements and personal property located on its Lot to the extent such loss or damage is covered by insurance carried by it. ARTICLE VI1 DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION 7.01 pamoge or putIpLmdJon. In the event of any damage to or destruction of any Building on the Lots, the Owner of the Lot upon which such Building is located, at Its election, at its sole cost and risk and with all due diligence, shall either (1) restore or replace such Building, subject to the provisions of this Declaration, or (ii) raze and remove all parts of said damaged or destroyed Building then remaining and the debris resulting therefrom and otherwise dean and restore the Building Area affected by such casualty to a level and clean condition. Regardless of which eiecUon the Owner of such Lot makes, the Owner of such Lot shall diligently proceed to restore the Common Area on its Lot to its pre -casualty condition. ARTICLE VIII 8.01 Own . Nothing herein shall be construed to give any Owner any Interest in any award or payments made to another Owner In connection with any exercise of eminent domain or transfer in lieu thereof affecting said other Owner's Lot or construed to give the public or any governmental entity any rights in the Lots. In the event of any exercise of eminent domain or transfer in lieu thereof of any part of the Common Area, the award attributable to the land and improvements of such portion of the Common Area shall be payable only to the Owner In fee thereof and no dalms thereon shall be made by the Owners of any other portion of the Common Area. 7 G;%W% PeSu=1.W37 X16 WK= Pam SdeOm OfPE* E&SCmu f kW ACOm AQ%WWSMA - DMantlon of ReC pFOW ENUuAR A/d A=="(2017-0rr21) P remser.o= 20170623001197,008 8.02 Collateral Claims. All other Owners of the Common Area may file collateral claims with the condemning authority for their losses which are separate and apart from the value of the land area and Improvements taken from another Owner. 8.03 Restoration o€ Common Area. The Owner of the fee of each portion of the Common Area so condemned or transferred shall promptly repair and restore the remaining portion of the Common Area on its Lot as nearly as practicable to its condition immediately prior to such condemnation or transfer without contribution from any other Owner. ARTICLE IX 9.01 Conversioai . Subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth In this Section 9.01, an Owner may construct a Building on any Common Area located on its Lot and thereby convert that portion of Common Area on which the Building is constructed into Building Area. Common Area on a Lot may only be converted into Building Area if. (1) The proposed Building and the Lot, following such conversion, will comply with all applicable Legal Requirements; (ii) The conversion will not cause material impairment of the means of access to, from and through the Lots; and (iii) Unless the Utility Providers or the Owners benefited by the applicable Existing Utilities otherwise agree, any Utillties that run below the portion of Common Area subject to conversion and any affected Operation Facilities will be relocated to other portions of the Common Area In accordance with Section 9.02 below by the Owner undertaking the conversion. The conversion from Common Area to Building Area shall be deemed to take effect upon commencement of construction of the Building. 9.02 R el[OLcation of utilities and operation Facilities. Each Owner shall have the right to relocate the Utilities or Operation Facilities located on Its Lot to other portions of the Common Area, whether or not on its Lot, subject to compliance with the following requirements: (1) The relocation will result in equal or better service to each of the other Lots served by such Utility or Operation Facilities; (li) If the Utility or Operation Facilities are being relocated to the Common Area on another Lot, the approval of the Owner of such other Lot shall first be obtained, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; (III) The relocating Owner shall obtain all necessary permits, licenses and approvals from the City of Federal Way and any applicable Utility Providers; (Iv) The relocation work shall be performed by a qualified contractor; (v) The relocation work shall be scheduled and conducted so as to minimize disruption to the Common Area; 8 G;VA�b PCa�2021.003N2016 ramt Pard S*k D c Of Redp Easenero Aria Aem Ap WWSDA - Dedeadm Of Ne*rml Easement And Aae= A gaR (2017-0&21) 20170MOOl 197.009 (vi) There shall be no interruption of utility services during retail business hours; (vii) The relocation work shall comply with all Legal Requirements and meet all other applicable requirements of governmental entities and Utility Providers; (viii) Upon completion of the relocation work, the affected Common Area shall be restored to a condition that is equal or better than its condition prior to commencement of the relocation work; and (ix) The relocating Owner shall be responsible for all costs and expenses associated with the relocation. ARTICLE X ENFORCIEME 10.01 Owners' Riahts_and Remedies. Each Owner shall have all rights and remedies available to it at law and in equity to enforce this Declaration against any Owner not In compliance with this Declaration. Such rights and remedies shall include specific performance and Injunctive relief. 10.02 Ptocedure. If an Owner ("Defaulting Owner") fails to pay when due any sum owed to another Owner ("Nondefouldng Owner") pursuant to this Declaration or any sum owed in connection with work performed on a Nondefaulting Owner's Lot, such sum shall bear Interest at the prime rate as established by the Seattle main office of Bank of America or its successor plus 4% and the Nondefaulting Owner shall be entitled to file a lien on the Defaulting Owner's Lot for the amount of the charge plus interest. Such lien shall be prior and superior to all other liens except: (a) the liens for taxes and governmental assessments which by law are superior, and (b) the lien of any Mortgage. The Nondefaulting Owner may bring an action at taw to enforce payment of delinquent charges against the Defaulting Owner In order to recover the amount of the charge and may also take whatever measures are provided for by law to foreclose or collect on the lien filed on the Defaulting Owner's Lot. If a legal action Is initiated to enforce or collect any charge, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees, court costs and other expenses of litigation. 10.03 Self Hely Remedy for Maintenance Eallure. In addition to the other rights and remedies provided at law or in equity or under this Declaration, if an Owner fails to perform a maintenance or repair obligation under this Declaration and fails to cure such default within 30 days after receiving notice thereof or such shorter period as may be appropriate in an emergency (or if such default cannot reasonably be cured within such period, fails to commence cure of such default within such period and carry out such cur: with reasonable diligence), any other Owner may enter the Lot of the Defaulting Owner, if necessary, and perform such obligation. The costs of such performance will be allocated in the same manner as though the work had been performed by the Defaulting Owner, but the Defaulting Owner shall pay the owner curing the default upon demand an amount equal to 10% of such costs for overhead and administration, plus reasonable attorneys' fees In connection with such performance. 10.04 Attorneys' Fees. The prevailing party in any action brought to interpret or enforce this Declaration shall be entitled to recover its attorneys' fees, court costs and other expenses of litigation from the non -prevailing party. 10.05 trio waiver of Right to Enforce. The failure of any Owner to enforce this Declaration or any part thereof shall in no event be deemed or construed to be a waiver of the right to do so for subsequent violations or of the right to enforce any other covenants, conditions or restrictions. 9 G:1AV% PEbM%M7 L003k2015 Vann Paod SaIeW C Or Re* Esnerts kid A=m A9%W WSDA • CedN2k1on 0! Wdp=1 Emmarh Arid AWM A¢nt (20174)621) Pnudvser.D= 20170623001197.010 10.06 No TWO Party Enforcemen4. This Declaration is only intended for the benefit of the Owners, any mortgagees under Mortgages, and those parties that otherwise hold a fee interest in a Lot. Only the benefited parties identified in the immediately preceding sentence shall be entitled to bring any legal action with respect to this Declaration, and no other parties (including, without limitation, any tenants or concessionaires of an Owner) shall have any right to bring a legal action against any Owner to enforce any terms or conditions of this Declaration. ARTICLE XI AMENDMENT 11.01 Amendments, This Declaration may not be modified or amended except by a written instrument duly executed by all Owners, and all Mortgagees; provided, however, Langley may unilaterally amend this Declaration: (i) to correct or clarify any mistake, omission or ambiguity in this Declaration if such correction has no substantive effect on the intended operation hereof; (ii) to update the Site Plan to reflect actual as -built locations; or (Ili) to reflect the reconfiguration of existing Lots or the creation of new Lots. No modification or amendment of this Declaration shall be effective until an appropriate instrument has been properly executed, and filed of record in the land records of the county In which the Lots are located. ARTICLE XII GENERAL PROVISIONS 12.01 Easements Running with Land, The rights, easements and covenants granted, declared and created under this Declaration shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Langley and the other owners and their respective heirs, successors and assigns and all those claiming by, through or under each such Owner or its heirs, successors and assigns. 12.02 Release from Lia 'li . Any person or entity acquiring fee title to any portion of a Lot shall be bound by this Declaration only as to the Lot acquired by such person or entity. Such person or entity shalt be bound by this Declaration only during the period such person or entity is the Fee owner of such Lot, except as to obligations, liabilities or responslbllities that accrue or are based on events which occur during its period of ownership. Although persons or entities may be released under this Section, the easements, covenants and restrictions In this Declaration shall continue to be benefits and burdens upon the Lots running with the land. 12.03 No Merger. The covenants and restrictions provided for herein shall remain in full force and effect and shall be unaffected by any change in ownership of the Lots, or any part of either of them, or by any change of use, demolition, reconstruction, expansion or other circumstances, except as spe&ied herein. The easements and easement rights set forth herein shall not be terminated or extinguished by merger of title or otherwise unless Owners and all Mortgagees execute a consent to the termination of such easements and easement rights and such consent Is recorded. 12.04 Severabiliity. If any term or provision of this Declaration, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held to be Invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remalnder of this Declaratlon, or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Declaration shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 12.05 . Each Owner shall at all times keep the other Owner informed in writing as to such Owner's proper legal name and address for purposes of sending notices. 10 C,!WL Ptla W 1.0DA2016 V=rt PWVd WDec Or rmdp Es cMerft Arid Aam AglWWSDA - OKWO n Or RoMrovr Msenct Ard Aar Aprt (2017-WZI) PLWOMMM 20170623001197.011 Each Owner shall be entitled to rely on the last name and address for the other Owner received by it In sending notices, regulations, invoices or other correspondence or materials required or contemplated under this Declaration. In addition, within 10 days after the written request of an Owner, the other Owner will issue a written estoppel certificate for reliance by third parties stating, as to the certifying Owner's knowledge, (i) whether or not, the requesting Owner and its Lot are in compliance with this Dedaration, and (li) what amounts, if any, are then due and still outstanding from such requesting Owner under this Declaration. 12.06 Mart>aA9-,. No breach of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained herein shall defeat or render Invalid the lien of any Mortgage now or hereinafter executed upon any portion of a Lot subject to this Declaration and no Mortgagee shall be personally liable for any amount due under this Declaration; provided, however, that the rights of any Mortgagee shall be subject to all of the covenants, conditions and restrictions of this Declaration, and if any portion of such property subject to any Mortgage is sold under a foreclosure of any mortgage or is conveyed to the Mortgagee or any other person in lieu of foreclosure, any purchaser at such sale or any such grantee and its successors and assigns shall hold any and all property so purchased and acquired subject to all of the covenants, conditions and restrictions of this Dedaration and shall be personally liable for any amounts due first arising under this Declaration after the date that such party obtains title. 12.07 GpyerningAr. This Declaration shall be governed, construed and enforced In accordance with the laws of the state in which the Lots are located, without regard to conflict of law principles. Langley and the Owners and their respective heirs, successors and assigns and all those claiming by, through or under each such Owner or Its heirs, successors and assigns, hereby irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and Federal courts located in the county in which the Lots are located. 12.08 Ti me of Essence. Time Is of the essence with respect to all provisions of this Declaration. 12.09 Term. This Declaration shall take effect as of the date that It is recorded In the land records of King County and shall remain In effect for a term of 75 years from the date of recording and will automatically be renewed for successive 10 year periods unless, at least 6 months prior to the scheduled expiration of this Declaration, the Owners unanimously elect not to so renew. (Signature page follows] 11 Gf�Adr, pda\2071.DOyX16 Vaunt Pad SalekDSC Or"EaemeYs And Aa= A9\W WSOA . Dadaadon Or PAdprocal Eararn[rt Arid Am= A9rt (2017.)6.21) PLv&alm.Daa 20170623001197.012 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration has been executed on the day and year first above written. LANGLEY: LANGLEY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS LTD., a British Columbia company By: Emily Docksteader, Authorized Signatory CANADA ) ss. PROVINCE OF 8RITISH COLUMBIA ) I certfy that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Emily Docksteader Is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this Instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the Instrument and acknowledged It as the Authorized Signatory of LANGLEY COMMERCIAL INVESTMENTS LTD., a British Columbia company, to be the free and voluntary act of such company for the uses and purposes mentioned In the Instrument, Dated this day of June, 2017. LKP o rJ iAroi .P1 L EiZ10 (print or type name) NOTARY PUBLIC In and for the Province of Brltlsh Columbia, residing at SK` ram;G_ IKPOMWOSA L ERO A �1ril�i� rR �!� 11w PYa+iaoa a1(3�ah Lakxrrdt� 960-15127100 AVOMM gu"y K y3A OR Tel: (5641W.88M FW (604M69976 SIgnature page to D edarabron OfReciprocal Easements and Acres; Agreement RESUBMITTEn Department of Community Development JAN 11 2019 33325 V, Avenue South CITY Of ' Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way CCTV OF FEDERAL WAY 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 GOMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT �v�v�v.ci�yoi'fedsialw,sy.rnm { 1,�� SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST J,xk Purpose of Checklist 60 \� r�V Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or comperlsatoty mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for Applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully; to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of'your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing; environment, all :interrelated aspects of the .proposal and are analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of Checklist fur 1Vonproject Proposals For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, ,plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of ,sections A-and'1-3.plu.s -the STd.PPLEMENTAL.STTEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTTONS {part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 1 of 15 kAl-landoutsTnvironmental Checklist CITY OF Federal Way A. BACKGROUND Name of'proposed project, if applicable: G 17'- �s.,�+GiN " C ck-ta , e- 2. Name of applicant: G r'e VI+ � awt b-e�� Department of Community Development 33325 8" Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.c iiyo ffvde i'aln•U V . cum M 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3S5-VV �8"' S4 • Scawle, U-A 19I0-7 4. Date checklist prepared: po ( b a Rev,seJ JGh 5. Agency requesting checklist: C (4 y o'C Fe')e rz I W A-y 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): � �$� �' •Sgr�rl� Z 9 $���,,�La�Cr t-+a11S1�6� MjA4tipulrc5. [fwcs+ rxrxs K.4e _heAPArw.,5Ta�xiS. S�S� tI`{�taiTYluGi's1) 7. Do you nave any plans �for future aheions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. N6 0-akyj . 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Mo�'e- Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Use- Prvcty-ts JZ 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. (� c'C-r 5 E l'A Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 2 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist CITY OF -=+ Federal Way 12. 1's1 Department of Community Development 33325 81, Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 w W tv.G i Iyol1 edCra I n'ay. caJn Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Or-w 151c,,y C kvrA L A, ld evil wI'Ot i4l 8i�L 5J' _ F u 5at)e s acr r_ Th r : I ie 15 1.65 ocres, All par kt' , 6f+�Vci.14iyv—CIArt3S a -cc, C�Ais97'�'}r�,�is•S �St~ ce irCs S�orvl� e� y� aria r �F bw,� [ Sir}Pwts�� o,fGanJ Location of the proposal .1 e suff leleAk il,§MMiurr fur a pi a to Understand ilie precise iocatiOn. of 6CA your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If J a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. �oi 1, Eas4-ce,*1rw-5 -farrarr - Lod 603t'VtJ'n S,qe Pjao) A-car'd,'►1 +o ik'e Rf�+ AeveA Ikec.or.�•e J 'o Vvrvmn .25Z e> 4 plc��-5 )aye5l S �7�lr��y� G3, 1IAcR Vo � ►rc A i:L c �u�t y�� �1c��1� t�vl r EN.VMWTUNTALOLEME S 30 -6 l'`J F� 7 . 1. Earth F-e eti !tv 1 ` a. General description of the site: (citcle one)_ Flats; iolling,.Wlly, steep slopes, mountainous, other __Fi Ia T b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Z % * less c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term corMPCrcW significw= and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. 11+1 SVta u, J y,�«VC I d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO vAe. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed_ Indicate source of fill. �eW S, d c vial K )9,d t' ; c vt �ccc eSs � IN ' r� -1 o 6 rf c J "'�'V-d red 6-Jo-J . ov'� fegraac, fC4-e,-14-'CPA PO4, Cat2.()C_y P.�I f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. _U t/ tZ Bulletin #050 —October 17, 2016 Page 3 of 15 kAHandoutsTrivironmental Checklist Department of Community Development . 33325 8" Avenue South cIry OF Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way/ 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 JJ W%V%y.61V[111idcrallv,jyxon7 g. About what percent of the site wilt be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (four example, asphalt or buildings)? �j c r)t,`$�►tia� 1"Kferv'vu5 ,�uP�t.te �rfj r�CT�^ '��;-700 �. J _ t :J aea ,�rn�ertlz'ox.s Sctr 12.81 - S r h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: rrr ff 1l �) i�l"cf �'leaPs+nc� r�rn.}�i► rvlS�u�f� �.���� ��Or:[. ��eYtc,° Ct_,j +�J,Cr.�Te J 2. Air On C` Vv 1 F1ath I-1MS-}u jJ C'e,:k t Las t'n f f-oftc --oIt. fC,5L f _ r a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quatltities if known. PO Ft f- t♦ b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Vv c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: VA- 3. Water a. Surface Water: Ct� 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)'? If yes, describe type and .provide naives. If appropriate, state what streamorriver,itd1ows auto. �'o r\�',A 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. VA � t 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water orwetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. AM _t 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. AIA Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 4 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist crrr OF Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 91 Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 �vwu.�it uf14J,-�:iln',iv.tum 5) Does the proposal lie within a l 00-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the ,proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and w-itic�ipated volume of discharge. PO I, b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well; proposed'uses and: approximate gpantities withdrawn from the well'. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general, description, pwaWse, and approximate qu�antities if known. / 1V6 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of rthe ,system, the ntiunber �of such s,ystems,:the n. mUer of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. PbMe c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities; if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe. S ay lNci'�e�. t-�-� u5e� �a��� �G.5�n5 w�4� VYIoJ�14� V-(4le 4-s-4- gefeV14,.6V1 rove. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. V0 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. Wa4cr is dk,reAe) 10 ca4c� (,44,',,15 &^j p{IrW{e'nr Jrc(('MS � d.Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern t 0 - ( impacts, if any: Use o� Mod 6 r Li zx4i ck A 5 €"� s e �4> r m vu�vt5 USAF 4. Plants CUA5ty'AC.4.ayl, 1-JAA0SCo.Qe f-k"r.r..Cjka��` .5'•+e- . Bulletin #050 —October 17, 2016 Page 5 of 15 Bliandoutsll?nvironmcntal Checklist CITY 01: Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 81 Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cit ❑f'i'cdci;tIrv:n,.com a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs _pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. 0 �} wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation 006L\ � 4 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? qq Po►,�. 54'e li�ffS ex eadr Pteti jejje)0reJ lvte-ILA ►^�i /CXAJSCape-, 9}� ut��,vi4. pad eL!(a i'.S ih: C k y A-V d J JJ c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. A) OVA -e- d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: r La J5c�� ,1 Z�� net./ w, I/ i�c n�4eve. �ouq�� �o1Yr�ti t// 4.1+s ye. fist all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. f A) L4 f 5. Animals a. List anyibirds and other animals which .havebeen observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle songbir other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: N 6 14 f fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: X)UI � b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. k)0N-C c. Its Ithe site part of a migration route? If so, explain. !V & Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 6 of 15 kMandoutsTrivironmental Checklist CirY flF Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 91 Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 w wi,.,,c ityti l 1 L'der'd i,,yily.com d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: I-ard SG&pe '.S CN1'51(1n9 QNJ + rtlMaci h e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. r/ NO -e- 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will'be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. PeAr,`e— v.vtd AJr JucV-at 1 G b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: �.v v )&-z.-Fmf.-7,y te� i'C ('e.A+ aft 0C-if5 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. IVGA,( kav;w✓1 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. V0A`( 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. vbiAt Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 7 of 15 UFlandoutsTrivironmental Checklist Department of Community Development 33325 8* Avenue South CITY or r Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 urn, w.c i Lv a Crt:dc rai way.com 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: f b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? PC" 11 (- 2) 3) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or .a long-term basis (for examPle: kmff+c, cionsk-,tiction, opmtion, other)? Indicate what hours noise Uwou d come from the site. II `S+o✓t 6f �vt5 �Iuc�,rGA `�& f ag v l a r 6 (k ar5 o'� w6 r k Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: W G"- k C! M i�M ` v( ceS J Li,r `It Z.O✓t c 8. Land and Shoreline Use �cauyi�00111A ��5•tJern�.�, a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent,praperties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Jr(" j ,S r >r i' 5 'V rAC 6X ^+ a d aJ ` a r• F vL+ f 49 f c' !, 5 aZ .s 1'V ,�' p 6 t l , C v1 �� � f � r b. Has the project site been used as Working a lamUs or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long -tern commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands'have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? 0v 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides; tilling, and harvesting? I.f so, how: VD 1" � c. Describe any structures on the site. �� G"OOLe Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 8 of 15 kAHandoutsTrivironmental Checklist kDepartment of Community Development errY OF 33325 91 Avenue South Federal i�+���i d Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 y 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cit rxl'(cdcral%va .cam d. Will any strictures be dernolished? If so, what? o e. What is the current zoning classification of.the site? V r -- I V--*, f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? FLiR(— 0� g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline "aster program designation of the site? NA- N A- h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. A) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 3--� rfof l it j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? K. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: A) A- 9. Housing a. Approx tiely-howmany n would be y wVided, if any?"Indicate whether High, middle, or low- income housing. A)A V b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. N/V Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 9 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environ men tat Checklist 41 k C(TY OF Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 8' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 ry my,e i tyo if cdera hvay.c oni c. P�rfoposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: lu 10. Aesthetics a. What is /the -tallestheight of auy proposed oucture(s), notincluding antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 26`-E�`l +� �Or 61� b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: �J('Sl�a^l TO ul je14U i✓� tA� c I rj 11lYfJi�� :� �j % zL�+ �% f-1 ° r(� �3'� 11. Light and Glare 7*t, �� ' f�r►v� U�I, a. What type of:li >tt tsr glare willAh-_,pmposa.l.priodacc? W �1t,tkne of day would .it mainly occur!? S�'G 4,0� 3 Se Curs 7� 1.0 4-�,`�t �� buy �dr.�� �er-" v1 de , �,S �7 �I✓i�l t- C70►"'N J4 PCcizCrACAJ 1' � �� � :X4Urc b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? A/ID14'(- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: -2owvk tJ ii,re j,",q 12. Recreation a. What des.igaated audinfumal Tetueational oppWtumilies are in the immediate vicinity? y 5��« b ir1 �, G 1`0 �,, ` 1" b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. a 0ok, Bulletin #050 —October 17, 2016 Page 10 of 15 k:\HandoutsTrivironmental Checklist ' Department of Community Development 33325 81 Avenue South CITY OFF Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Way 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citv(lffedel-,51w,iv.com c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: l,%v D Ll t 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, stnnctures, or sites, located:on of war the site that are over 45 yeas old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. P() Z b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Tndian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural impaatance eta or near the site? Please list any,professional studies conducted at the site to r identify such resources. VJ 00 te 1C,nvw v1 c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of ardicalogy f and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. ! V 1�}iil�rJo�l �j tJ ncew+ _hi) �roreJr are- heL,-/ OK Cc pk, f��I`��j5� IU l+ ti GteL) hislve•c.. fe5oicrcr5 on or ;�►�r�� �:���! d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. 11C�i� A 1<✓I c, W A �' a .fib carC of `'� GL�,�S �'� Pub� , `� V 14. Transportation �� f a. Mea ffy piiblic .streets and high, ways serving/the site or affectcd ;geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Th si`-4e L,.,&4.1) bc. 4cces5ed rom L ye/ iI&euser �t%ay S , S', r Close rrox+�.;�y fo 1-5 b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe_ If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? I k e_ G d o s.e s� 6 u 5 c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed projector non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? i 1 'Pvt J J ,a Bulletin #050 —October 17, 2016 Page 11 of 15 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist cirY OF Federal Way Department of community Development 33325 8'° Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 ww�v,ch srFfcdcralsva .«,m d. Will the proposal require any new of inxprove'lzents 10 existing roads, streets, podcstrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Ve-kp s,'de ,a,ctl k �, e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. NO / f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the voltune would be trucks (such as comIncrcial and nonpasscriger vehicles). What data or transportation tnodt,lS w�-m used to make these Pcrimates? l / I j f } wtr� kdal pee-%�Dztl- �Fv+dt(S 6-�r' 5 per- 1 TL y�KA ce-4(0' " Tr.- -Vic"J ��/lf fG��Qch jp7k � l I I Will the proposal interfere with,�affect or be affect d by the movement �u� ' 12 y g Y merit of harlcultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. AV U h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if an _ 1 r0 f"i J }� JJ 4 y ` ftvIA der PW +' � AI 1005-F 10 -%�CLKiC l.JJr 6e�le/�' r�yvl U-� JG��ur PoII'lIjly 15. Public Services iK.�ly LJ I W L a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, polioe7 jProtec�ti }on, public transit, health lc1are,, schools, other)? T1f so, 1gcnncrally describe, h• e- IU "a bill l'! (� l n {.i �/t� i'f l re f u e',-e 5 ►'� �J GP (U 1 �1l (J e fj Z dL vi u o' [ C 'e U Y' -4 c6 b`� . b. P��rlopQosed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. IU r' - 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities cutreart'ly availab9e at the site: lect�i-t furs p �— �` S, vvatc eft'se Sel ele hon sanitary se r, other septic system, b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction +activities aft the site or in the iiumediate vicinityrxrhich might be needed. �,a4er, j4tf a&%d � fl c4.,� L. I w lCe �uVj eq U it 1,4'eS fleiM1j rtAcl IL. 11-� t' Gi r51P�1� 1(i Bulletin #050 - t]Ctnher 17, 2016 l2oflS k-Miandouts\linvironmental Checklist CITY OF Federal flay C. SIGNATURE Department of Community Development 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 4VN1VxilyUl I L'[1L'f:41 iV;ly.L'U111 The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. J Signature: Name of Signee: Lacy br Position and Agency/Organization: �e -�� 4 f Pl vyy r r Cc Date Submitted: Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 13 of 15 k FlandoutsTrivironmelital Checklist A�k CITY 4F Federal Way Community Development Department NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: SDA Hispanic Church Project Description: Construct a 12,894 square foot church building and associated site improvements, on an existing building pad. Applicant Agent: Brent Lambeth, Architect, 355 NW 48`" Street, Seattle, WA 98107 Project Location: 32125 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003, Parcel ID 215484-0010 Date of Application: October 30, 2018 Date Determined Complete: November 27, 2018 Date of Notice of Application: December 7, 2018 Public Comments Due: December 26, 2018 x �zan ---'I-'—^ L`—I i rOS-� Y Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: The applicant requests a Use Process III decision (file #18-105080-UP) issued by the Director of Community Development pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65. Additional permits and/or approvals in conjunction with the Use Process III decision include a threshold determination pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules WAC 197-11 (file #18-105081- SE), Concurrency (file #18-105083-CN). Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Environmental Checklist, and Preliminary Stormwater Drainage Technical Information Report, Transportation Management Plan, Trip Generation and Parking Assessment. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: FWRC Title 14 "Environmental Policy"; Title 16 "Surface Water Management"; and Title 19 "Zoning and Development Code." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWRC, 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way, and the Public Works Department Development Standards. Public Comment & Appeals: The official project file is available for public review at the Community Development Department (address below). Any person may submit written comments on the Use Process III application to the Director of Community Development by December 26, 2018. Only the applicant, persons who submit written documents to the director, or persons who specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the director's decision. Availability of File and Environmental Documents: The official project file and referenced environmental documents are available for public review during normal business hours at the Community Development Department, 33325 8d' Avenue South, 2nd Floor, Federal Way, WA 98003. 18-105080-UP Doc ID 78544 Staff Contact: Senior Planner Jim Harris, 253-835-2652, jim.hanis@cityoffederalway.com 18-105080-UP Doc ID 78544 SODA SPANISH CHURCH - COLOR BOARD FEDERAL WAY, WA NAVAJO WHITE —STUCCO BLACK DIAMOND -THIN BRICK-VANEER BRICK BROWN -STUCCO ACCENT __ 1-�, YY i Viz. 4�f• 1 'ik�� ;'� k -i i,. - Imo. .!b.?I'a" �1� `r• rL.:�7 � n� ' �:•.7� . -� ��� dam.- •'fir `rJ�-?-r '.-�4.'_�R�;rr�% '�•t !'• `.5.+;*,! Win. •�''�� �''"'r � -- � �. _ k•.. DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM-WINDOW/DOORS DESIGN INTENT The shape and design of the structure as well as the material choices was intended to provide continuity between the project building and the surrounding office park. The use of stucco and commercial glazing was intended to produce a commercial building look that would fit well in an office park environment and at the same time identify itself as a church building. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES The project site incorporates many features to help encourage pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation. Parking is laid out in such a way to encourage loop access as well as access to all entrance points to the building. The parking area is broken up with landscape islands as well as outdoor courtyard and wide walkways. The entry courtyard is clearly visible from the right of way. There is a strong connection between the building, parking and public right-of-way. Utilities such as transformer are to be screened with landscaping and does not block views from the right of way. The retention ponds is designed to blend in with the site landscaping. At the west fagade which is visible from the right of way we are modulating the facade for a distance of 30 feet. Also provided is a pedestrian plaza that is 916 S.F. The facades are articulated with architectural features such as awnings and projections and with material variations. The main entrance to the building is clearly recognizable from the right of way and incorporates many features to highlight this such as awnings and glass facades. RECEIVED OCT 3 0 2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -) RECEIVED 2�1$ MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION OCT DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South CITY OF CffY OF FEDERAL WAY Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 C4MAMUNrrf DEVELOPMENT 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way 1.offederalwaycotii APPLICATION NO(S)_S Date �� 0 Project Name r k k-.t- ! _ D IC Property Address/Location f f�'s '�� `�II Feo�rrW1E a � ��-y � Parcel Number(i) T06 ! I {�I ► �'l [[ c r Project Description 1 $r r .2� s �T C� c. • `�. ���^ r �,�� /I j I I A.14,01e1i AAl1 r.4,f0rrS rrwrn. a li�1 4o 6' 'o rrh re-tCw4.�>✓, PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI —7 SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information VKt it r t Zoning Designation PComprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements 1. 5 . 1/: Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): ^ A 3 Occupancy Type V` � —Construction Type Applicant 1 Name: 13.re t4 kvtP 4e-14 Address: 355 1JV 4$t4 �4. City/State: 5eol f/ W Zip: q 9107 Phone&3) 9 19 q7+L 3 0 Fax: Email: [�� -% � b QiC% � 4t C • CO M'1 Signature: (/�oe or Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: �N�NC o 5D� �r'l c 6 • �V � S Address:3aDo � {� -� of City/State: Fe_dc,,~,ti Wc-y WA zip: 9`t3CO I ++ Phone: - 6Dq Fax: -a 53 - 8 i ` 6o01 Email: e:i' c c OavC+wC uL. Signature:� A -SC,_- 10.X Sec r0mr, tin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application 12/5/2018 https://itetripgen.org/PrintGrap_ h.htm?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=12.9&edition=385&IocationCode=General Urba... Church (560) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 13 Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 32 Directional Distribution: 45% entering, 55% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.49 0.14 - 2.10 0.40 Data Plot and Equation 50 X 40 U) w 30 a H i H 20 X X X 10 9 X 6 W X� 00 13 50 100 X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA X Study Site Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.37(X) + 3.90 X 150 Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition • Institute of Transportation Engineers Average Rate R2= 0.65 200 https://itetripgen.org/PrintGraph.htm?code=560&ivlabel=QFQAF&timeperiod=TPSIDE&x=12.9&edition=385&IocationCode=General%20Urban/Suburb... 1 /1 Kevin Peterson From: Kevin Peterson Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 11:18 AM To: 'Dave Dormier' Subject: RE: East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 Drainage Calculations Dave, Yes, that is what we were looking for. Kevin Peterson Engineering Plans Reviewer City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 835-2734 From: Dave Dormier [mailto:ddormier@ruperteng.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 2:33 PM To: Kevin Peterson Cc: kirkman@nventure.com; Cole Elliott; 'Eric Davis' Subject: RE: East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 Drainage Calculations Kevin, The following is a volume comparison from existing and new rule requirements. Roof Volume in existing regional detention pond The original East Campus Volumes were determined using the KCSWDM 1998 Draft for Combined Wetpond / Detention volume (see attached). The east Campus total pond volume for the east basin is 148,597 cubic feet. The volume of the pond dedicated to the original planned roof area was calculated by backing out the 0.347 acres of roof from the original calculation equations and determining the difference been the pond volume equation results. The volume of the existing pond dedicated to the roof area was determined to be 1,598 CF ( 148,597 CF— 146,998.64CF). see attached pdf "orig... volume.pdf' for calculation details. Required roof volume under current_ rules The new roof area detention volume required to meet current rules was determined using WWHM2012 for the 15,120 SF or 0.347 acres of new roof. Based on WWHM2012 calculation results the new roof area requires 0.166 Acre -FT or 7,230 CF of storage volume. Based on these results the current regional detention pond accounts for 22% (1,598 CF / 7,230 CF) of the required new roof stormwater detention volume under new current rules. For details see attached "wwhm 15k roof.pdf" Modified roof area / volume Kevin Peterson From: Dave Dormier <ddormier@ruperteng.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 2:33 PM To: Kevin Peterson Cc: kirkman@nventure.com; Cole Elliott; 'Eric Davis' Subject: RE: East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 Drainage Calculations Attachments: wwhm 12k roof.pdf, wwhm 15k roof.pdf; east campus org pond calc.pdf Kevin, The following is a volume comparison from existing and new rule requirements. Roof Volume in existing regional detention pond The original East Campus Volumes were determined using the KCSWDM 1998 Draft for Combined Wetpond / Detention volume (see attached). The east Campus total pond volume for the east basin is 148,597 cubic feet. The volume of the pond dedicated to the original planned roof area was calculated by backing out the 0.347 acres of roof from the original calculation equations and determining the difference been the pond volume equation results. The volume of the existing pond dedicated to the roof area was determined to be 1,598 CF ( 148,597 CF-146,998.64 CF). see attached Of "orig... volume.pdf" for calculation details. Required roof volume under current rules The new roof area detention volume required to meet current rules was determined using WWHM2012 for the 15,120 SF or 0.347 acres of new roof. Based on WWHM2012 calculation results the new roof area requires 0.166 Acre -FT or 7,230 CF of storage volume. Based on these results the current regional detention pond accounts for 22% (1,598 CF / 7,230 CF) of the required new roof stormwater detention volume under new current rules. For details see attached "wwhm 15k roof.pdf" it Z30 cF ' 1130/40 = le5v--k-S/G = -? o- t2s Modified roof area volume = ,/_� l k = d o ` Now that it has been determined that 22% of the required new roof storage volume is provided in the current regional detention pond, the new permitted roof area for detention volumes permit calculations should be (15,120 SF * (1-0.22)) = 11,778 SF. To Simplify a roof area of 12,000 SF (0.275 Acres) was used to determine the final new onsite roof detention system volume. Based on WWHM2012 calculation results the modified roof area requires 0.138 Acre -FT or 6,011 CF of storage volume. The modified roof storage volume requirement of 6,011 CF plus the existing regional pond roof provided storage volume of 1,598 CF gives a total provided storage volume of 7,609 CF which is greater than the 7,230 CF of volume determined to be required per current rules. For details see attached "wwhm 12k roof.pdf" (",aii14D — �,2S'O-7aSf6 = 7-5-05 Concerns 1 V._ q - 40 x -ZS x6 The WWHM2012 mitigated flows for the 2 YR storm events, that accounts for 98% of all yearly storm events, have release rates are 0.0063 CFS for the 15K roof and 0.0038 CFS (1.7 gpm) for the 12K roof. The orifice sizes are a % of an inch in diameter or the size of a pea. I understand that per section 5.1.4.1 the minimum orifice diameter is 0.25 inches, yet one little piece of a leaf and this system will be clogged. M i+ a r� •g µ � ::� a Let me know it this is what you were expecting based on your Volume comment below. Thanks. ��. }fit •�i+h.ifg" 7579 W. vOHA--* orhu ff W. o4u1nmfx, W,4- 98007 (2 53)833- 777G From: Kevin Peterson [mailto:Kevin.Peterson@cityoffederalway.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 4:20 PM To: 'Dave Dormier' Cc: kirkman@nventure.com; Cole Elliott Subject: RE: East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 Drainage Calculations Dave, Based upon what we have received, I think there may have been some misunderstanding regarding the approach to the storm water analysis that was discussed at our meeting. Our expectation was that you would model the pre and post development using the old code standards for your site — Lot G - and then model your site using the current standards/requirements (pre -developed as fully forested and post -developed as the site is currently developed plus the proposed new SDA building), and then compare the difference between the original volume and the 'new'. The difference in required pond volume is then what you would design to for Lot G. 2 Kevin Peterson Engineering Plans Reviewer City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 835-2734 From: Dave Dormier [maiIto: ddormier(a ruperteng.com] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 1:18 PM To: Kevin Peterson Cc: kirkmanCchnventure.com Subject: East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 Drainage Calculations This email is an analysis of the East Campus drainage system as it relates to Lot G parcel 1. The East Campus Drainage system was design for each lot to have 79% impervious surface and 21% pervious landscaping. The Hydrograph method used was the Santa Barbra Method with site soils type "C" and CN numbers of 98 and 86 respectfully. The original drainage numbers for lot G parcel 1 based on the SBUH Hydrograph numbers are as follows. Original East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 SBUH Drainage Calculations Parcel Area Impery Pervious Lot Drainage Peak Flows Lot G Parcel 1 1.65 AC 79% 21% 2 YR 1 10 YR 1 100 YR 1.3 AC 0.35 AC 0.62 CFS 0.95 CFS 11.38 CFS Based on the current developed lot parking layout, landscaping areas, and building pad areas the lot G impervious area decreased to 1.21 AC and the landscape area has increased to 0.44 AC . Based on these changes from the original East Campus drainage design the peak flows from Lot G parcel 1 has decreased. The following are the flow rates for lot G per WWHM2012 are as follows. Original East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 WWHM2012 Drainage Calculations Parcel Design Impery Pervious Lot Drainage Peak Flows Lot G Parcel 1 Original design 79% 1.3 AC 21% 2 YR 10 YR 100 YR 0.35 AC 0..51 CFS 0.75 CFS 1.08 CFS Current dev layout Parking Building landscape 0.48 CFS 0.72 CFS 1.04 CFS 0.87 AC 0.35 AC 0.43 AC Based on the decrease of the impervious surface for lot G parcel 1 the current lot layout analysis passed the flow duration of WWHM2012 of the original log G parcel 1 design flows. Based on discussion with city drainage standards, the current developed lot G meets current permitted system standards. We ask for your concurrence. v 4f ; LQ tl } r % •.1 §i � (1jjjj � I • t � I � I I .f�'If '�,� 11 _ I I Dave Dorniier Dui'ert Engineering driormnier Cairn perlen.rosaw 425 3) 833-7776 r SSSff - rl 4 Qap@93R C r@gdEM@@9flM J9 DM@. CONSULTING ENGINEERS/CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL PO Box 836 Auburn, WA 98071 253-833-7776 Fax 253-939-2168 JOB EAS 7- CAMPtl CJaP )VA11K CAtU SHEET NO. I OF ' t CALCULATED BY DAZ E�3 CHECKED BY — DATE SCALE Oe,3 u, 7) C/o, ILLY J, q 7 ' . w� f � 117) (0,71/9 VI PART B: DEVELOPED SITE HYDROLOGY The developed site hydrology for East Campus Corporate Park - Parcel 1 was analyzed using the BW-2 and SBUH methodologies. The developed site was calculated as two drainage basins. The SCS curve number entered into Waterworks© software was computed separately for the developed impervious and pervious surfaces per the Barker Method. The pervious time of concentration is also set at 1125 minutes for a flat forested condition, and 1255 minutes for flat grassed conditions, while the impervious time of concentration was computed. The composite CN coefficients were then calculated for both the pervious and impervious surface and then adjusted per the 7 day formula on page 3.5.2-4 of King County Surface Water Design Manual. The project's developed basin landuse breakdown was calculated for the public road right-of-way and the commercial lots separately. The developed area for the public ROW was calculated as 88% impervious and 12% pervious, while the commercial lots were calculated as 79% impervious and 21 % pervious.. The pervious area was assumed to be landscaping, or a CN = 86 (modified 7 day CN = 76.30). The impervious surfaces considered were the impervious parking area, building and sidewalks with a CN = 98. The CN value for the proposed wetpond surface was assumed to be a CN of 100. The composite CN for the impervious was computed to be 97.35 and 96.73 for the west and east basin, respectively. The composite CN for the west and east basin are 71.91 and 75.72. Please refer to the attached Developed Basin Map. Analysis parameters for the calculations are as follows: Developed Basin West Basin Total I,awn/landscaping Natural & Buffer Impervious Asphalt, Building, Open Water (Wetpond & Wetland) Bypass Area Lawn/Landscaping Impervious East Basin Onsite Total Pervious Lawn/Landscaping Pond Substation (Lawn) Substation (Gravel) Substation (Forest) Impervious Building, Parking, Road Open Water (Pond) 27.85 Acres 4.64 Acres 5.84 Acres 12.43 Acres 4.94 Acres (0.24 Ac. + 4.70 Ac.) 0.88 Acres 0.17 Acres 0.71 Acres 37.53 Acres 9.72 Acres 6.11 Acres 2.00 Acres 0.07 Acres 0.42 Acres 1.12 Acres 27.81 Acres 24.43 Acres 1.78 Acres Open Water (Wetlands "D" & "E") Offsite Total Pervious (Lawn/Landscaping) Impervious Total East Basin BYPASS AREA Lawn/Landscaping Impervious CN Coefficients Hydrologic Soil Group Lawn/Landscaping Natural Buffer Impervious Asphalt, Building, Sidewalk Open Water lm2ervious/Perv€ous Composite CN West Basin CNI = 12.43(96.3) + 4.70(100) + 0.24(100) 12.43 + 4.70 + 0.24 CNI = 97.35 1.60 Acres 2.78 Acres 1.17 Acres 1.61 Acres 40.3I Acres 1.54 Acres 1.17 Acres 0.37 Acres "C„ CN = 86 Converted CN = 76.30 CN = 81 Converted CN = 68.90 CN = 98 Converted CN = 96.30 CN = 100 Converted CN = 100 CNp = 3.70(76.3) + 0.94(76.3) +3.59(68.9) + 2.25(68.9) 10.48 CNp = 72.18 Fast Basin CNI = 24.43(96.3) + 1.78(100) + 0.81(100) + 0.79(100) + 1.61(96.3) 24.43 + 1.78+0.81 +0.79+ 1.61 CNI = 96.73 CNp = 6.11 76.3 + 2.00 76.3 + 0.07 76.3 + 1.17(76.3) + 0.42(81) + 1.12 68.9 6.11 +2.00+0.07+ 1.17 + 0.42 + 1.12 CNp = 75.72 Note: CN coefficients are adjusted for the difference between the 24 hour and 7 day events per KCSWDM page 3.5.2-4. The hydrographs for the impervious and pervious areas of the site shall be computed separately. Time of Concentration Impervious Areas The time of concentration for the impervious areas was assumed to be 10 minutes for the developed basins. Pervious The pervious time of concentration for the western and eastern basin are the same per the requirements of the Barker Methodology. The pervious time of concentration is taken as 1255 minutes for a flat grassed landscaped areas per the Barker Method. Rainfall Intensities Design Storm Precipitation 2 Year 7 Day 4.30 inches 10 Year 7 Day 5.80 inches 100 Year 7 Day 7.80 inches 2 Year 24 Hour 2.04 inches 10 Year 24 Hour 2.90 inches 100 Year 24 Hour 4.00 inches Developed Drainage Features Onsite: The western basin will consist of a storm drainage system, Wetpond/Detention Pond, Emergency Overflow Spillway. The eastern basin will consist of a storm drainage system, Wetpond/Detention Pond, and Emergency Overflow Spillway. Offsitea The western basin will discharge to the existing wetland buffer. The outlet for the wetland is an existing 36" diameter culvert, which flows westerly underneath Interstate 5. The eastern basin will discharge to the existing wetland along the right-of-way of Weyerhaeuser Way South. The existing culvert is a 12" diameter culvert, which ultimately drains to North Lake. PART C: ' HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS The storm drainage detention hydrologic modeling is per the current version of the KCSWDM adopted by the City of Federal Way and the "Barker Method" or Modified SBUH Revised Guidelines for the 7 Day Storm Detention Methodology, dated July '15, 1994. The design storm criteria is the 2 Vear 7 Da- Existing discharge e for the 2 Year a' 0 ,� � g 7 Day Developed event and the 1v Year 7 Day Existing discharge for the 10 Year 7 Day Developed event when utilizing the SBUH Methodology with the Barker Method applied. Per the City of Federal Way current interpretation of the Barker Methodology, the ponds volume was increased by 30% for a factor of safety. The water quality design criteria for the combined wetpond/detention facility is per the KCSWDM , dated September 1998 DRAFT. The manual has not yet been approved by the City o TPe-der FWa—a ...4 separdi6 variance request has been submitted and approved by the City of Federal Way for the use of the new design criteria. This "new" design criteria allows the combined wetpond/detention facilities to be two cell without the additional biofrltration swale. The water quality volume will be determined using a VbNr• ratio equal to 3. The sizing of the combined wetpond/detention facility has been computed by using Waterworks0 software program. The sizing then follows the normal sizing procedures. The following table summarizes the existing flows, developed flows and the adjusted allowable discharge rates. West Basin Storm Existing I Basin Developed Basin Bypass Basin Allowable Event (cfs) (28.73 Ac.) (cfs) (27.85 Ac.) (cfs) (0.88 Ac.) Discharge (cfs) 2 Yr 7 Dy 2.13 WE-2EX 4.03 DW2.-2 0.16 DW2-2 1.97 10 Yr 7 Dy 2.91 Wl-IOEX 5.56 DW2-10 0.22 BW2-10 2.91 East Basin Storm Existing Basin Developed Basin Bypass Basin Allowable Event (cfs) (41.85 Ac.) (cfs) (40.31 Ac.) (cfs) (1.54 Ac.) Discharge (cfs) 2 Yr 7 Dy 1.80 El-2EX 6.66 DEl-2 0.26 BDl-2 1.54 10 Yr7 Dy 2.92 EI-10EX 9.13 DE1-10 0.36 BDl-10 2.56 Water Quality Facilities West Basin Step 1: Identify required wetpool volume factor Wetpool volume factor = 3 Step 2: Determine rainfall (R) for the mean annual storm. The mean annual rainfall is determined by the isopluvial per Figure 6.41.A (p. 6-69) R = 0.47 Step 3: Determine the wetpond tributary area (Ad) Ad = 17.31 Ac (27.85 Ac. - 5.84 Ac. (Natural/Buffer) - 4.70 Ac. (wetland)) Step 4: Calculate Runoff Coefficient (C) C=0.9Ai+0.25At Q +21tf+0.01A0 Ad C = 0.9(I2.67) + 0.25 4.64} + 0.10(0) 17.31 C = 0.7258 Step 5: Calculate wetpool design volume (Vb) where: Vb = (VbNr)RAdC(43,560/12) Vb = wetpool volume (cf) Vb/Vr = 3 R = mean rainfall coefficient (niches) 43,560/12 = conversion factor for square feet/acres Vb =(3)(0.47)(17.31)(0.7258)(43,560/12) Vb = 64,304.26 C;Ubi( fee[ F.AONTRA41N Step 1: Identify required wetpool volume factor Wetpool volume factor = 3 Step 2: Determine rainfall (R) for the mean annual storm. "I'he mean annual rainfall is determined by the isopluvial per Figure 6ALA (p. 6-69) R = 0.47 Step 3: Determine the wetpond tributary area (Ad) Ad = 40.31 Ac Step 4: Calculate Runoff Coefficient (C) C = 0.9Ai + 0.25At +� 0.10At + 0.01 A0 Ad C = 0.9(29.42) + 0.25(9.77) + 0.10(1.12) 40.31 ' C = 0.72 Step 5: Calculate wetpool design volume (Vb) where: Vb = (VbNr)RAdC(43,560/l2) Vb = wetpool. volume (cf) Vb/Vr = 3 R = mean rainfall coefficient (inches) 43,560/12 = conversion factor for square feet/acres Vb =(3)(0.47)(40.31)(0.72)(43,560/12) Vb = 148,597 cubic feet WHM2012 PROJECT REPO T 121 000 SF or 1,39 f3V l L C)1 "6-- /Za a r 41V E-A A c tzc FT V o t, v1�-4 p �, ,enerai Model In" "matron Project Name: FD SDA 80 roof Site Name: Site Address: City: Report Date: 3/1/2017 Gage: Seatac Data Start: 1948110/01 Data End: 2009/09/30 Timestep: 15 Minute Precip Scale: 1.00 Version Date: 2016/03/11 Version: 4.2.12 POC Thresholds Low Flow Threshold for POC1: 50 Percent of the 2 Year High Flow Threshold for POC1: 50 Year FD SDA 80 roof 31112017 J: 18:35 AM Page 2 Lenduse Basin Data Pre, developed Land Use Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Lana Use acre C, Forest, Flat 0.275 Pervious Total 0.275 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 0.275 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater FD SDA 80 roof 3/1/20 i 7 9:18:35 AM Page 3 Mitigated Lana Use Basin 1 Bypass: No Groundwater: No Pervious Land Use acre Pervious Total 0 Impervious Land Use acre ROOF TOPS FLAT 0.275 Impervious Total 0.275 Basin Total 0.275 Element Flows To: Surface Intertlow Groundwater Trapezoidal Pond 1 Trapezoidal Pond I Fu S A 80 roof 3/1/2017 918:35 AM Page 4 Routing Elements Predeveloped Routing FD SDA 60 roof 3/1120•1r 9: 8:35 AM Page 5 klli;qated Routing Trapezoidal Pond 1 Bottom Length: 68.00 ft. Bottom Width: 3.00 ft. Depth: 5.3511. Volurne at riser head: 0.1387 acre-feet. Side slope 1: 3 To I Side slope 2: 3 To I Side slope 3: 3 To 1 Side slope 4: 3 To 1 Discharge Structure Riser Height: 4.35 ft. Riser Diameter: 12 in. Orifice I Diameter: 0.25 in. Elevation:O ft. Orifice 2 Diameter: 0.9 in. Elevation:3.9 ft. Element Flows To: Outlet i Outlet 2 Pond Hydraulic Table Stage(feet) Area(ac.) Volume(ac-%) Discharge(efs) Infilt(cfs) 0.0000 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0594 0.005 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.1189 0.005 0,000 0.000 0.000 0.1783 0.006 0.001 0.000 0,000 0,2378 0.007 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.2972 0.007 0,001 0,000 0.000 0.3567 0,008 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.4161 0.008 0.002 0.001 0,000 0.4756 0.009 0.003 0.001 0.000 0.5350 0.010 0,003 0.001 0.000 0,5944 0.010 0.004 0.001 0.000 0.6539 0.011 0.005 0.001 0.000 0.7133 0.012 0.005 0,001 0.000 0,7728 0.012 0.006 0.001 0.000 0.8322 0.013 0.007 0.001 0,000 0.8917 0.014 0.008 0.001 0,000 0.9511 0.014 0.009 0.001 0.000 1.0106 0.015 0.010 0.001 0,000 1.0700 0.016 0.010 0.001 0.000 1.1294 0.016 0.011, 0.001 0.000 1.1889 0.017 0.012 0.001 0.000 1,2483 0.018 0.014 0.001 0.000 1.3078 0,018 0.015 0.001 0.000 1.3672 0.019 0.016 0.002 0.000 1.4267 0.020 0.017 0.002 0.000 1.4861 0.021 0.018 0.002 0.000 1.5456 0.021 0.019 0.002 0.000 1.6050 0.022 0.021 0.002 0.000 1.6644 0.023 0.022 0.002 0.000 1,7239 0.024 0.024 0.002 0.000 1.7833 0.024 0.025 0.002 0,000 1.8428 0.025 0.027 0.002 0.000 1.9022 0.026 0.028 0.002 0.000 1.9617 0.027 0.030 0.002 0.000 FD F)DA 80 roof 3/1/2017 9:18:35 AM Page 6 2.0211 0.027 0.031 0.002 0.000 2,0806 0.028 0.033 0.002 0,000 2.1400 0.029 0.035 0.002 0.000 2.1994 0.030 0.036 0.002 0.000 2.2589 0.031 0.038 0.002 0.000 2.3183 0.031 0.040 0.002 0.000 2.3778 0.032 0.042 0.002 0.000 2.4372 0.033 0.044 0.002 0.000 2.4967 0.034 0.046 0,002 0.000 2.5561 0.035 0.048 0.002 0.000 2,6156 0.035 0.050 0.002 0.000 2.6750 0.036 0.052 0.002 0.000 2.7344 0.037 0.055 0.002 0,000 2.7939 0.038 0.057 0.002 0,000 2.8533 0.039 0.059 0.002 0.000 2,9128 0.040 0.061 0.002 0.000 2,9722 0.041 0.064 0.002 0.000 3.0317 0.041 0.066 0.003 0.000 3,0911 0.042 0.069 0,003 0,000 3.1506 0.043 0,071 0.003 0.000 3.2100 0.044 0,074 0.003 0.000 3.2694 0.045 0.077 0.003 0,000 3.3289 0.046 0.079 0.003 0.000 3.3883 0.047 0.082 0.003 0.000 3.4478 0.048 0.085 0.003 0.000 3.5072 0.049 0,088 0.003 0,000 3.5667 0.050 0,091 0,003 0.000 3.6261 0.051 0.094 0.003 0.000 3.6856 0.052 0,097 0.003 0.000 3,7450 0.052 0.100 0.003 0.000 3.8044 0.053 0.103 0.003 0,000 3,8639 0.054 0.107 0.003 0.000 3.9233 0.055 0.110 0.006 0.000 3.9828 0.056 0.113 0.009 0.000 4.0422 0.057 0.117 0.011 0.000 4.1017 0.058 0.120 0,013 0.000 4,1611 0.059 0.124 0.014 0.000 4,2206 0.060 0.127 0.015 0.000 4.2800 0.061 0.131 0.017 0.000 4.3394 0.062 0.134 0.0i8 0.000 4.3989 0.063 0.138 0.133 0,000 4.4583 0.064 0.142 0.395 0.000 4.5178 0.065 0.146 0.731 0.000 4.5772 0.066 0.150 1.098 0,000 4.6367 0.067 0.154 1.457 0.000 4.6961 0.068 0.158 1.767 0.000 4.7556 0.069 0.162 2.002 0.000 4.8150 0.070 0.166 2.159 0.000 4.8744 0.072 0.170 2.306 0.000 4.9339 0.073 0.175 2.432 0.000 4.9933 0.074 0.179 2.553 0,000 5.0528 0.075 0.184 2.667 0.000 5.1122 0.076 0.188 2.777 0.000 5.1717 0.077 0,193 2,883 0,000 5.2311 0.078 0.197 2.985 0.000 5.2906 0.079 0,202 3,084 0.000 5.3500 0.080 0.207 3.180 0.000 FD SDA 90 roof 3/ i/20,1 19:18:35 AM Page 7 Analysis Results POC 9 e%.5 16E b 11�.•] 10E.2 SCE -I 1 10 100 P�.ra®nt Tlm® Exo�vdin[� Y Predeveloped Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area: 0,275 Total Impervious Area: 0 Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area: 0 Total Impervious Area: 0.275 1 X Mitigated Flow Frequency Method: Log Pearson Type III 17B Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC #1 Return Period Flow(c s) 2 year 0,008085 a year 0.012698 10 year 0.015312 25 year 0.018082 50 year 0.019796 100 year 0.021253 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated. POC #1 Return Period Flow(cts) 2 year 0.003867 5 year 0.006809 10 year 0.009557 25 year 0.014198 50 year 0.01869 100 year 0.024249 Annual Peaks Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Year Predeveloped Mitigated 1949 0.008 0.003 1950 0.010 0.003 1951 0.018 0.017 1952 0.006 0.003 1953 0.005 0.008 1954 0.007 0.003 1955 0.011 0.003 1956 0.009 0.014 1957 0.007 0.003 1958 0,008 0.003 LIIMLL&'%':L Pm,b--W FD SDA 80 roof 3/1/2017 9:18:3 5 AM Page 9 1959 0.007 0.003 1960 0.012 0.005 1961 0.007 0.003 1962 0.004 0.003 1963 0.006 0.003 1964 0.008 0.003 1965 0.005 0.003 1966 0.005 0.003 1967 0.011 0.003 1968 0.007 0.003 1969 0.007 0.003 1970 0.006 0.003 1971 0.006 0.003 1972 0.013 0.014 1973 0.006 0.004 1974 0.007 0.003 1975 0.009 0.003 1976 0.006 0.003 1977 0.001 0.003 1978 0.006 0.003 1979 0.003 0.003 1980 0.013 0.014 1981 0.005 0.003 1982 0.010 0.003 1983 0.009 0.003 1984 0.005 0.003 1985 0.003 0.003 1986 0.014 0.003 1987 0.012 0.003 1988 0.005 0.003 1989 0.003 0.003 1990 0.026 0.003 1991 0.016 0.014 1992 0.006 0.003 1993 0.006 0.003 1994 0.002 0.003 1995 0.009 0.003 1996 0.019 0.016 1997 0.016 0.016 1998 0.004 0.003 1999 0.015 0.012 2000 0.006 0.003 2001 0.001 0.002 2002 0.007 0.003 2003 0.009 0.003 2004 0.011 0.013 2005 0.008 0.003 2006 0.010 0.012 2007 0.019 0.018 2008 0.025 0.008 2009 0.012 0.003 Ranked Annual Peaks Ranked Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 (Rank Predeveloped Mitigated 1 0.0259 0.0180 2 0.0248 0.0168 3 0.0192 0.0160 FD SDA 80 roof 3/1/2017 9:19:24 AM Page 10 4 0.0189 0.0160 5 0.0178 0.0144 6 0.0158 0.0141 7 0.0156 0.0141 8 0.0149 0.0139 9 0.0140 0.0134 10 0.0133 0.0119 11 0.0126 0.0119 12 0.0124 0.0082 13 0.0122 0.0081 14 0.0120 0.0046 15 0.0113 0.0037 16 0.0111 0.0033 17 0.0110 0.0033 18 0.0099 0.0033 19 0.0097 0.0033 20 0.0096 0.0033 21 0.0090 0.0033 22 0.0089 0.0033 23 0.0088 0.0032 24 0.0087 0.0032 25 0.0087 0.0032 26 0.0081 0.0032 27 0.0080 0.0032 28 0.0079 0.0031 29 0.0076 0.0031 30 0.0071 0.0031 31 0.0070 0.0031 32 0.0069 0.0031 33 0.0069 0.0031 34 0.0069 0.0031 35 0.0068 0.0030 36 0.0067 0.0030 37 0.0065 0.0030 38 0.0064 0.0030 39 0.0063 0.0030 40 0.0063 0.0030 41 0.0060 0.0030 42 0.0060 0.0030 43 0.0059 0.0030 44 0.0058 0.0030 45 0.0056 0.0030 46 0.0056 0.0030 47 0.0055 0.0029 48 0.0055 0.0029 49 0.0053 0.0029 50 0.0053 0.0029 51 0.0050 0.0029 52 0.0049 0.0028 53 0.0045 0.0028 54 0.0042 0.0028 55 0.0036 0.0028 56 0.0034 0,0027 57 0.0032 0.0027 58 0.0032 0.0027 59 0.0021 0.0026 60 0.0011 0.00216 61 0.0008 0.0025 FD SDA 80 roar 31112017 9:19:24 AM Page 11 Duration Flows The Facility PASSED Flow(cfs) Predev mit Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0040 17556 3850 21 Pass 0.0042 16164 3749 23 Pass 0.0044 14968 3653 24 Pass 0.0045 13856 3551 25 Pass 0.0047 12810 3439 26 Pass 0.0048 11809 3339 28 Pass 0.0050 10900 3228 29 Pass 0.0052 10119 3116 30 Pass 0.0053 9383 3005 32 Pass 0.0055 8731 2924 33 Pass 0.0056 8147 2832 34 Pass 0.0058 7593 2746 36 Pass 0.0060 7058 2676 37 Pass 0.0061 6588 2590 39 Pass 0.0063 6145 2505 40 Pass 0.0064 5777 2436 42 Pass 0.0066 5431 2374 43 Pass 0.0067 5097 2297 45 Pass 0.0069 4808 2218 46 Pass 0.0071 4524 2130 47 Pass 0.0072 4252 2051 48 Pass 0.0074 4017 1973 49 Pass 0.0075 3782 1898 50 Pass 0.0077 3546 1829 51 Pass 0.0079 3337 1759 52 Pass 0.0080 3138 1678 53 Pass 0.0082 2952 1602 54 Pass 0.0083 2785 1538 55 Pass 0.0085 2597 1492 57 Pass 0.0087 2447 1450 59 Pass 0.0088 2304 1412 61 Pass 0.0090 2160 1373 63 Pass 0.0091 2025 1334 65 Pass 0.0093 1898 1296 68 Pass 0.0095 1790 1260 70 Pass 0.0096 1688 1232 72 Pass 0.0098 1583 1196 75 Pass 0.0099 1483 1149 77 Pass 0.0101 1386 1103 79 Pass 0.0102 1295 1056 81 Pass 0.0104 1225 1015 82 Pass 0.0106 1156 974 84 Pass 0.0107 1098 938 85 Pass 0.0109 1049 904 86 Pass 0.0110 997 862 86 Pass 0.0112 930 823 88 Pass 0.0114 883 793 89 Pass 0.0115 837 762 91 Pass 0.0117 789 725 91 Pass 0.0118 744 685 92 Pass 0.0120 718 644 89 Pass 0.0122 671 613 91 Pass 0.0123 633 575 90 Pass FD SDA 80 roof 3/1/20'1 7 9:19:24 AM Page 13 0.0125 596 548 91 Pass 0.0126 567 521 91 Pass 0.0128 539 488 90 Pass 0.0130 497 454 91 Pass 0.0131 473 417 88 Pass 0.0133 434 388 89 Pass 0.0134 399 357 89 Pass 0.0136 366 325 88 Pass 0.0137 348 303 87 Pass 0.0139 324 278 85 Pass 0.0141 296 247 83 Pass 0.0142 273 230 84 Pass 0.0144 256 219 85 Pass 0.0145 235 204 86 Pass 0.0147 217 193 88 Pass 0.0149 196 177 90 Pass 0.0150 180 165 91 Pass 0.0152 158 154 97 Pass 0.0153 145 137 94 Pass 0.0155 130 126 96 Pass 0.0157 119 115 96 Pass 0.0158 109 102 93 Pass 0.0160 97 85 87 Pass 0.0161 91 73 80 Pass 0.0163 82 67 81 Pass 0.0165 76 62 81 Pass 0.0166 69 53 76 Pass 0.0168 61 47 77 Pass 0.0169 54 40 74 Pass 0.0171 48 38 79 Pass 0.0172 41 35 85 Pass 0.0174 38 33 86 Pass 0.0176 33 27 81 Pass 0.0177 27 18 66 Pass 0.0179 22 14 63 Pass 0.0180 21 1 4 Pass 0.0182 20 0 0 Pass 0.0184 19 0 0 Pass 0.0185 17 0 0 Pass 0.0187 14 0 0 Pass 0.0188 12 0 0 Pass 0.0190 8 0 0 Pass 0.0192 4 0 0 Pass 0.0193 3 0 0 Pass 0.0195 3 0 0 Pass 0.0196 3 0 0 Pass 0.0198 3 0 0 Pass FD SDA F50 roof 3/1/2017 9: 1i:1:24 AM P a g a if+ General Model Infarmaiian Project Name: SDA FW Roof pond Site Name: Site Address: City: Report Date: 03101 /2017 Gage: Seatac Data Start: 1948/10/01 Data End: 2009/09/30 Timestep: 15 Minute Precip Scale: 1.00 Version Date: 2016/02/25 Version: 4.2.12 POC Thresholds Low Flaw Threshold for POC1; 50 Percent of the 2 Year High Flow Threshold for POC1: 50 Year SDA Fw Roof pond OW112017 9:01:10 AM Page 2 Landuse ! :asin Oata Predevelaned Land Use Bypass: No Groundwater: No Pervious Land Use acre C, Forest, Flat 0.347 Pervious Total 0.347 Impervious Land Use acre Impervious Total 0 Basin Total 0.347 Element Flows To: Surface 111ic.'r(low Groundwater SDA r W Roof pond 03/0112017 9:01:10 AM Page 3 1INr (fated Land Use Basin 1 Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use acre Pervious Total 0 Impervious Land Use acre ROOF TOPS FLAT 0.347 Impervious Total 0.347 Basin Total 0.347 Element Flows To: Surface Trapezoidal Pond 1 Interflow Groundwater Trapezoidal Pond 1 SDA FW Roof pond 03/01/201 i 9:01:10 AM Page 4 outing Elements Predeveloped Routing SDA i=W Roof pond 03i0V2017 9:01:10 AM Page. 5 Mitigated Routing Trapezoidal Pond Bottom Length: Bottom Width: Depth: Volume at riser head: Side slope 1: Side slope 2: Side slope 3: Side slope 4: Discharge Structure Riser Height: Riser Diameter: Orifice 1 Diameter: Orifice 2 Diameter: Element Flows To: Outlet 1 85.00 ft. 3.00 ft. 5.35 ft. 0.1665 acre-feet. 3 To 1 3To1 3To1 3 To 1 4.35 ft. 12 in. 0.325 in. Elevation:0 ft. 0.83 in. Elevation:3.5 ft. Outlet 2 Pond Hydraulic Table Stage(feet) 0.0000 0.0594 0.1189 0.1783 0.2378 0.2972 0.3567 0.4161 0.4756 0.5350 0.5944 0.6539 0.7133 0.7728 0.8322 0.8917 0.9511 1.0106 1.0700 1.1294 1.1889 1.2483 1.3078 1.3672 1.4267 1.4861 1.5456 1.6050 1.6644 1.7239 1.7833 1.8428 i .9022 1.9617 tkroa(ac.) 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.014 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.018 0.019 0.020 0.021 0.022 0.023 0.024 0.024 0.025 0.026 0.027 0.028 0.029 0.030 0.031 0.031 0.032 Volume(ac4k.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.010 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.018 0.020 0.021 0.023 0.024 0.026 0.027 0.029 0.031 0.033 0.035 0.036 Discharge(cfs) 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.00 i 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.004 OM4 Infilt(cfs) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 SDA FVV Roof pond 03101/2017 9:01:10 AM rage 6 2.0211 0.033 0.038 0.004 0.000 2.0806 0.034 0.040 0.004 0.000 2.1400 0.035 0.043 0.004 0.000 2.1994 0.036 0.045 0.004 0.000 2.2589 0.037 0.047 0.004 0.000 2.3183 0.038 0.049 0.004 0.000 2.3778 0.039 0.051 0.004 0.000 2.4372 0.040 0.054 0.004 0.000 2.4967 0.041 0.056 0.004 0.000 2.5561 0.042 0.059 0.004 0.000 2.6156 0.043 0.061 0.004 0.000 2.6750 0.044 0.064 0.004 0A00 2.7344 0.045 0.067 0.004 0.000 2.7939 0.046 0.069 0.004 0.000 2.8533 0.047 0.072 0.004 0.000 2.9128 0.048 0.075 0.004 0.000 2.9722 0.049 0.078 0.004 0.000 3.0317 0.050 0.081 0.005 0.000 3.0911 0.051 0.084 0.005 0.000 3.1506 0.052 0.087 0.005 0.000 3.2100 0.053 0.090 0.005 0.000 3.2694 0.054 0.093 0.005 0.000 3.3289 0.055 0.096 0.005 0.000 3.3883 0.056 0.100 0.005 0.000 3.4478 0.057 0.103 0.005 0.000 3.5072 0.058 0.107 0.007 0.000 3.5667 0.059 0.110 0.010 0.000 3.6261 0.060 0.114 0.012 0.000 3.6856 0.061 0.117 0.013 0.000 3.7450 0.062 0.121 0.014 0.000 3.8044 0.063 0.125 0.015 0.000 3.8639 0.065 0.129 0.016 0.000 3.9233 0.066 0.132 0.017 0.000 3.9828 0.067 0.136 0.018 0.000 4.0422 0.068 0.140 0.019 0.000 4.1017 0.069 0.145 0.020 0A00 4.1611 0.070 0.149 0.021 0.000 4.2206 0.071 0.153 0.021 0.000 4.2800 0.072 0.157 0.022 0.000 4.3394 0.074 0.162 0.023 0.000 4.3989 0.075 0.166 0.138 0.000 4.4583 0.076 0.171 0.399 0.000 4.5178 0.077 0.175 0.735 0.000 4.5772 0.078 0.180 1.102 0.000 4.6367 0.079 0.184 1.460 0.000 4.6961 0.081 0.189 1.770 0.000 4.7556 0.082 0.194 2.005 0.000 4.8150 0.083 0.199 2.162 0.000 4.8744 0.084 0.204 2.309 0.000 4.9339 0.085 0.209 2.435 0.000 4.9933 0.087 0.214 2.555 0.000 5.0528 0.088 0.219 2.670 0.000 5.1122 0.089 0.225 2.780 0.000 5.1717 0.090 0.230 2.885 0.000 5.2311 0.091 0.235 2.987 0.000 5.2906 0.093 0.241 3.086 0.000 5.3500 0.094 0.247 3.181 0.000 SUA FVV Roof pond 03/01/2017 9:01:10 AM Page 7 Analysis Results POC I M 8o ICES IOE•1 IOE-3 IOE-2 IOE-1 —.e — I— r_x..,oner Corru!alive Ploba�x41y u r r -- �; 01 1 ru tO0 0,?1 r 0a;t Oa 1 2 i W 20 39 O 70 $O 93 O$ N3 B9 B9:r1 + Predeveloped x Mitigated Predeveloped Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area: 0.347 Total impervious Area: 0 Mitigated Landuse Totals for POC #1 Total Pervious Area: 0 Total Impervious Area: 0.347 Plow Frequency Method: Log Pearson Type III 17B Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped. POC #1 Return Period Flow(ofs) 2 year 0.010202 5 year 0.016023 10 year 0.019321 25 year 0.022816 50 year 0.024979 100 year 0.026818 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Mitigated. POC #1 Return Period IFlow(cfs) 2 year 0.006272 5 year 0.010198 10 year 0.013646 25 year 0.019171 50 year 0.024277 100 year 0.030363 A nnual Peaks Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Year Predeveloped Mitigated 1949 0.010 0.005 1950 0.012 0.005 1951 0.022 0.018 1952 0.007 0.004 1953 0.006 0.005 1954 0.009 0.005 1955 0.014 0.005 1956 0.011 0.012 1957 0.009 0.005 1958 0.010 0.005 SOA FW Roof pond 03/0'1/2017 9:0 IO AM Faye 9 1959 0.009 0.005 1960 0.015 0.015 1961 0.009 0.005 1962 0.005 0,004 1963 0.007 0.005 1964 0.010 0.005 1965 0.007 0.008 1966 0.007 0.005 1967 0,014 0.005 1968 0.009 0.005 1969 0.008 0.005 1970 0.007 0.005 1971 0.007 0.005 1972 0.017 0.016 1973 0.008 0.009 1974 0.008 0,005 1975 0.011 0.005 1976 0.008 0.005 1977 0.001 0.005 1978 0.007 0.005 1979 0.004 0.004 1980 0.016 0,017 1981 0.006 0.005 1982 0.012 0.011 1983 0.011 0.005 1984 0.007 0.004 1985 0.004 0.005 1986 0.018 0.005 1987 0.016 0.014 1988 0.006 0.005 1989 0.004 0.005 1990 0.033 0.014 1991 0A20 0.016 1992 0.008 0.005 1993 0.008 0.004 1994 0,003 0.004 1995 0.011 0.005 1996 0.024 0.017 1997 0.020 0.018 1998 0.005 0.005 1999 0.019 0.015 2000 0.008 0.005 2001 0.001 0.004 2002 0.009 0.005 2003 0.011 0.005 2004 0.014 0.019 2005 0.010 0.005 2006 0.012 0.013 2007 0.024 0.023 2008 0,031 0.017 2009 0,015 0.005 Ranked Annual Peaks Ranked Annual Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Rank Predeveloped Mitigated 1 0.0327 0.0226 2 0.0313 0.0192 3 0.0243 0.0180 SDA FW Roof pond 03/01/2017 9:02:05 AM Page 10 4 0.0239 0.017 7 5 0.0225 0.0174 6 0.0200 0.0173 7 0.0197 0.0170 8 0.01€37 0.0159 9 0.0177 0.0159 10 0.0167 0.0153 11 0.0159 0.0150 12 0.0156 0.0142 13 0.0154 0.0136 14 0.0152 0.0130 15 0.0143 0.0122 16 0.0140 0.0109 '17 0.0139 0.0092 'f 8 0.0125 0.0083 19 0.0122 0.0053 20 0.0121 0.0053 21 0.0113 0.0052 22 0.0112 0.0052 23 0.0112 0.0052 24 0.0110 0.0052 25 0.0109 0.0052 26 0.0102 0.0052 27 0.0101 0.0051 28 0.0100 0.0051 29 0.0096 0.0051 30 0.0090 0.0050 31 0.0088 0.0050 32 0.0087 0.0050 33 0.0087 0.0049 34 0.0086 0.0049 35 0.0086 0.0049 36 0.0085 0.0049 37 0.0082 0.0049 38 0.0081 0.0049 39 0.0079 0.0048 40 0.0079 0.0048 41 0.0076 0.0048 42 0.0076 0.0048 43 0.0075 0.0048 44 0.0073 0.0048 45 0.0071 0.0048 46 0.0071 0.0048 47 0.0070 0.0047 48 0.0069 0.0047 49 0.0067 0.0046 50 0.0066 0.0046 51 0.0063 0.0046 52 0.0062 0.0046 53 0.0057 0.0045 54 0.0053 0.0045 55 0.0045 0.0044 56 0.0043 0.0044 57 0.0040 0.0043 58 0.0040 0.0042 59 0.0027 0.0041 60 0.0014 0.0041 61 0.0010 0.0041 SUA FW Roo( pond 03/01/2017 9:02:05 AM Page 'I 'I Duration Flows The Facility PASSED Flow(cfs) Prodev mit Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0051 17545 12292 70 Pass 0.0053 16164 4964 30 Pass 0.0055 14966 4295 28 Pass 0.0057 13851 4115 29 Pass 0.0059 12810 3931 30 Pass 0.0061 11811 3771 31 Pass 0.0063 10900 3602 33 Pass 0.0065 10119 3461 34 Pass 0.0067 9383 3313 35 Pass 0.0069 8729 3176 36 Pass 0.0071 8145 3061 37 Pass 0.0073 7593 2988 39 Pass 0.0075 7060 2911 41 Pass 0.0077 6588 2834 43 Pass 0.0079 6145 2772 45 Pass 0.0081 5777 2721 47 Pass 0.0083 5431 2665 49 Pass 0.0085 5097 2609 51 Pass 0.0087 4808 2556 53 Pass 0.0089 4524 2498 55 Pass 0.0091 4252 7445 57 Pass 0.0093 4017 2402 59 Pass 0.0095 3782 2359 62 Pass 0.0097 3546 2291 64 Pass 0.0099 3337 2244 67 Pass 0.0101 3138 2199 70 Pass 0.0103 2952 2158 73 Pass 0.0105 2787 2095 75 Pass 0.0107 2599 2033 78 Pass 0.0109 2449 1967 80 Pass 0.0111 2308 1913 82 Pass 0.0113 2162 1853 85 Pass 0.0115 2029 1788 88 Pass 0.0117 1903 1718 90 Pass 0.0119 1790 1656 92 Pass 0.0121 1694 1568 92 Pass 0.0123 1594 1476 92 Pass 0.0125 1483 1404 94 Pass 0.0127 1379 1338 97 Pass 0.0129 1292 1277 98 Pass 0.0131 1220 1208 99 Pass 0.0133 11155 1140 98 Pass 0.0135 1098 1084 98 Pass 0.0137 1049 1019 97 Pass 0.0139 997 963 96 Pass 0.0141 930 896 96 Pass 0.0143 884 835 94 Pass 0.0145 839 789 94 Pass 0.0147 790 745 94 Pass 0.0149 743 701 94 Pass 0.0151 713 644 90 Pass 0.0153 668 600 89 Pass 0.0155 630 558 88 Pass SDA FW Roof pond 03/01/2017 9:02:05 AM 171age 13 0.0157 596 510 85 Pass 0.0159 566 461 81 Pass 0.0161 539 425 78 Pass 0.0163 497 397 79 Pass 0.0165 473 369 78 Pass 0.0167 436 330 75 Pass 0.0169 401 302 75 Pass 0.0171 369 272 73 Pass 0.0173 348 240 68 Pass 0.0175 324 223 68 Pass 0.0178 296 201 67 Pass 0.0180 272 188 69 Pass 0.0182 256 173 67 Pass 0.0184 235 165 70 Pass 0.0186 217 157 72 Pass 0.0188 197 149 75 Pass 0.0190 180 135 75 Pass 0.0192 158 123 77 Pass 0.0194 145 116 80 Pass 0.0196 129 112 86 Pass 0.0198 119 109 91 Pass 0.0200 109 105 96 Pass 0.0202 97 95 97 Pass 0.0204 91 87 95 Pass 0.0206 82 80 97 Pass 0.0208 76 69 90 Pass 0.0210 69 63 91 Pass 0.0212 61 58 95 Pass 0.0214 54 53 98 Pass 0.0216 48 47 97 Pass 0.0218 41 42 102 Pass 0.0220 38 38 100 Pass 0.0222 33 33 100 Pass 0.0224 27 19 70 Pass 0.0226 22 9 40 Pass 0.0228 21 0 0 Pass 0.0230 20 0 0 Pass 0.0232 19 0 0 Pass 0.0234 17 0 0 Pass 0.0236 14 0 0 Pass 0.0238 12 0 0 Pass 0.0240 9 0 0 Pass 0.0242 4 0 0 Pass 0.0244 3 0 0 Pass 0.0246 3 0 0 Pass 0.0248 3 0 0 Pass 0.0250 3 0 0 Pass SDA FW Roof pond 0310 1120 17 9:02:05 AM Page 14 Kevin Peterson From: Dave Dormier <ddormier@ruperteng.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 2:33 PM To: Kevin Peterson Cc: kirkman@nventure.com; Cole Elliott; 'Eric Davis' Subject: RE: East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 Drainage Calculations Attachments: wwhm 12k roof.pdf, wwhm 15k roof.pdf; east campus org pond calc.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Kevin, The following is a volume comparison from existing and new rule requirements. Roof Volume in existing regional detention pond The original East Campus Volumes were determined using the KCSWDM 1998 Draft for Combined Wetpond / Detention volume (see attached). The east Campus total pond volume for the east basin is 148,597 cubic feet. The volume of the pond dedicated to the original planned roof area was calculated by backing out the 0.347 acres of roof from the original calculation equations and determining the difference been the pond volume equation results. The volume of the existing pond dedicated to the roof area was determined to be 1,598 CF ( 148,597 CF—146,998.64 CF). see attached pdf "orig... volume.pdf" for calculation details. Required roof volume under current rules The new roof area detention volume required to meet current rules was determined using WWHM2012 for the 15,120 SF or 0.347 acres of new roof. Based on WWHM2012 calculation results the new roof area requires 0.166 Acre -FT or 7,230 CF of storage volume. Based on these results the current regional detention pond accounts for 22% (1,598 CF / 7,230 CF) of the required new roof stormwater detention volume under new current rules. For details see attached "wwhm 15k roof.pdf" Modified roof area / volume Now that it has been determined that 22% of the required new roof storage volume is provided in the current regional detention pond, the new permitted roof area for detention volumes permit calculations should be (15,120 SF * (1-0.22)) = 11,778 SF. To Simplify a roof area of 12,000 SF (0.275 Acres) was used to determine the final new onsite roof detention system volume. Based on WWHM2012 calculation results the modified roof area requires 0.138 Acre -FT or 6,011 CF of storage volume. The modified roof storage volume requirement of 6,011 CF plus the existing regional pond roof provided storage volume of 1,598 CF gives a total provided storage volume of 7,609 CF which is greater than the 7,230 CF of volume determined to be required per current rules. For details see attached "wwhm 12k roof.pdf" Concerns The WWHM2012 mitigated flows for the 2 YR storm events, that accounts for 98% of all yearly storm events, have release rates are 0.0063 CFS for the 15K roof and 0.0038 CFS (1.7 gpm) for the 12K roof. The orifice sizes are a % of an inch in diameter or the size of a pea. I understand that per section 5.1.4.1 the minimum orifice diameter is 0.25 inches, yet one little piece of a leaf and this system will be clogged. 1 feJ :L Let me know it this is what you were expecting based on your Volume comment below. Thanks. Vmvm Vaft"Lta�YL R"p-1'a �� 7579 W. VMU,_-* o...&. JY. Wc4-96001 (253)633-7776 From: Kevin Peterson [mailto:Kevin.Peterson@cityoffederalway.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 4:20 PM To: 'Dave Dormier' Cc: kirkman@nventure.com; Cole Elliott Subject: RE: East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 Drainage Calculations Dave, Based upon what we have received, I think there may have been some misunderstanding regarding the approach to the storm water analysis that was discussed at our meeting. Our expectation was that you would model the pre and post development using the old code standards for your site — Lot G - and then model your site using the current standards/requirements (pre -developed as fully forested and post -developed as the site is currently developed plus the proposed new SDA building), and then compare the difference between the original volume and the 'new'. The difference in required pond volume is then what you would design to for Lot G. z Kevin Peterson Engineering Plans Reviewer City of Federal Way 33325 81h Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 (253) 835-2734 From: Dave Dormier [maiito:ddormieraru erten .com] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2016 1:18 PM To: Kevin Peterson Cc: kirkman(a-in_v_enture.com Subject: East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 Drainage Calculations This email is an analysis of the East Campus drainage system as it relates to Lot G parcel 1. The East Campus Drainage system was design for each lot to have 79% impervious surface and 21% pervious landscaping. The Hydrograph method used was the Santa Barbra Method with site soils type "C" and CN numbers of 98 and 86 respectfully. The original drainage numbers for lot G parcel 1 based on the SBUH Hydrograph numbers are as follows. Original East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 SBUH Drainage Calculations Parcel Area Impery Pervious Lot Drainage Peak Flows Lot G Parcel 1 1.65 AC 79% 21% 2 YR 1 10 YR 1 100 YR 1.3 AC 0.35 AC 1 0.62 CFS 10.95 CFS 1.38 CFS Based on the current developed lot parking layout, landscaping areas, and building pad areas the lot G impervious area decreased to 1.21 AC and the landscape area has increased to 0.44 AC . Based on these changes from the original East Campus drainage design the peak flows from Lot G parcel 1 has decreased. The following are the flow rates for lot G per WWHM2012 are as follows. Original East Campus Lot G Parcel 1 WWHM2012 Drainage Calculations Parcel Design Impery Pervious Lot Drainage Peak Flows Lot G Parcel 1 Original design 79% 1.3 AC 21% 2 YR 10 YR 100 YR 0.35 AC 0.31 CFS 0.75 CFS 1.08 CFS Current dev layout Parking Building landscape 0.48 CFS 0.72 CFS 1.04 CFS 0.87 AC 0.35 AC 0.43 AC Based on the decrease of the impervious surface for lot G parcel 1 the current lot layout analysis passed the flow duration of WWHM2012 of the original log G parcel 1 design flows. Based on discussion with city drainage standards, the current developed lot G meets current permitted system standards. We ask for your concurrence. Dave 11101-11-twiter Rupert Eingincerin" dthbranier CWrimpor4eng.r.011111 4253) 833-7776 L �43 I .ter � �-r..•1.=� �r --J • ���� _� I . ��► �{fin Yam' • � � � � _ �'+ � ,dam - +�� RB:VISION5 N0. OBSC1,�.1,D1VDAlE !R Id SIM ro W.W. Esr y,/'9, 2 2M SUB. m UAW. CSx WRIC4 g g CD It LU w Z T 3 w O V a Q � Q Z a Q. Q m a: � w p a U ( q C .z a Qo a Uzi 3 w 0 U JOB NO.: 191-41-872-001 DWO. NAME: DV-B N DESIGNED BY: F.B. DRAWN BY: F.B/JMN CHECKED BY: lt IL, VIVO o �or ma 18 im MAY : o iS59 OF 1 SHEETS EAST COMBINED DETENTION / WETPOND �r I POND VOLUME STATISTICS W�J—I APRDX. ELEV- = 4-42.00 TYPE REQUIRED (CF) PROVIDED (CF) AS CONSTRUCTED (CF) 44 435 WATER QUALITY VOLUME 148,597 172,435 177,445 5 DETENTION 2yr 7day + 3DR (416.51) 270.204 296.928 313,145 10yr 7day + 307(418.61) 381,468 419,197 438,749 MAX. VOLUME AT SPILLWAY - 443,188 452.013 ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE DESIGN POND ELEVATIONS 2 1EXISTING \ GROUND II I 4 JAJLHO iISE INLET ACCESS RDAD ►A \ .!� ELEV. -448", H o• XAPHRAGM :LTER (3' M ) \ / 418"B3 a'EE DETAIL HIS SHEET 11 9 N12� 112, 4 420_ \ \ �.. O S� -0.251� _ i -- _, I riS. 70YR OAY ELEV. = 4l8.79 SEE DETAIL SEEER TAIL THIS SHEET HIS �SLF., NAB: •I I I ' W-S. 2YR DAY DESIG ELEV. _ +f't6:,r1- 416.69 AS BUIL 5� I I I .nS = 8.'B61 - 8.46%i _ 415 415 11j 8.67' 351 -W LF. N12 IWO -91h. 3 I 3I S NECESSAR`f 6' ®g -JZ'A 1 I.E. 409.84 _409.0 In TOP OF WiFER QUALITY VOLUME 410.12 LS BU7 407.5$ I - - — CELL 1 2 1 2 t CELL 2 5.95' W RACK 10' 39.7 F. f f'112 1 TRASH 4 i I l l j — — ' IL ®S C.B. ."e - 4✓m I jE C.B. 4 2- -m TDP of s ELEV. = 4 a 4., 1g' TT AA _ •4 .67 '�� / / PDLI.VTIQR CQNTfiOL D SOLID LOCKING LID s OVER OVERFLOW W UCTi12E 410.05 ELEV. 4E9:69 LI LOCKN4G RIM - iA 41 $.93 2 �LL 1I- RIM = 4RI,00 42.0.0 II F,�a_ 9�.- tg',24" 3tjy' , LE=i40539 30"0 40U- ,300 16' WIDE KEY I BERM IS T BE iT�Y'�`f>iiR7�i6"i +l0.03, 1B"7i r S SEE DEIAfL SHEET C}19 +1D.06. ta3•>a 4D5.fi9 1 FI AS TD. NOT RE EXISTING C UIRED IF TO IPACTED MA REMAIN TRIALS. KEY IN BERM PEEC , 300 E I G OE 12 TECHNICAL NOT '' A ' I ON SHEET C-14 l POND SECTION A- A FLTER DIAPHRAGM SCALE 1"-20' 1"=5' HORIZ VERr. CLEAN TO WSDOT OR GRAVELLY SAND, CONFORMING STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 9-03.1(2)B CLASS 1, FOR FINE AGGREGATE. v 30. Row 2' MIN. I f N 4' 1 -EXISTING ,ROUND I 15' MAI f . ACCESS DAD \ I / SEE DEf JL SHEET Ct13 / \ — / N 142.0 L.F., N12 42"m& \ \ J fr F R 4 _ u 2 o ®S- 51.0 % 0.45% i WLL 10YR 7 DAY ION ELLY" IE1EVm42 .O0 �® S= 42"m& 964E -7.04% W`S. jj 2YR 7 Y DESIGN I E:LEV. _ ++*54- I 416.69(AS I BUILT)I P1 1 J 1' MIN. p I.E�I(i6aP6, 406.23 42l m ��- I 6.67' T� 3 � J 5 I W/I j 42' TRASH IIRACK I 1 JV TGP OF WATER QUALITY VOLUME ELEV. =410-1710.12 fAjfL 410 2.03' ( MIN.) i CELL 1 5.95' Jf 4Q;Z TYPE • LID LOCK 2-7 0 : 1dTENT�sT -' 18" M �ATFON = R A _ 430:BBT 409.82, 42 072 42"m S 409.77, 42. E I 400 RI♦] _400 RAP SPLAS(S PAD ! THICK 1 4"r12"m i SEE RIP RAP DETAIL SHd_T C-13 I 3 POND SECTION B-B SCALE 1 -20' HORIZ- 1"=5' VERT. DIAPt-MGM TITER SECTION A —A MIN. 30' OUR"ET� PIPE DRAk1AGE LA (PEA GI�A�ILI AREA .. 7/3 SQ. (MPROR, 6'x9") FILTER LAYER (FINE AGGREG41E7 SURROLiNO PEA 6GRAVEL WITH FINE AGGREGATE, ♦i MIN. ALL SIDES OF LEAD OUT DRAIN OUTLET PIPE w/ LEAD —OUT DRAINS FILTER DIAP QR M DETAIL FOR FILTER DIAPHRAGM NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE N: I HEREBY DECLARE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE AS -CONSTRUCTED CONDITIONS" THIS CERTIFICATION Q•w$$' IS BASED UPON WORK PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING All R SURVEYING PRACTICE. R. SCOTT MACINTOSH. L-S. NO. 15661 DATE: ^/1'/" , I f»'�s 21r.Vn WARNING WARNING CONSTRUCTION IS WITHIN THE VICINfTY OF THE EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS A HIGH PRESSURE GAS LINE. CONTRACTOR SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEPTH IS UNKNOWN. ACTIVITIES WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY. CALL 1-800-424-5555. r 87T GROUT (TYP.) JApl1OUSE INLET ELEVATION=-140.SE• 418.83 BARS 4 6' OiC- SOUD LOCKING FRAME 2' & COVER MARKED 'DRAIN' 42 RIM = 42tBB 420.83 I I.E. STEPS - METAL OR PLASTIC 410.' 2 �/ SEE NOTE #3 r SHEAR GATE Lf. = 410.17 ORIFICE �2, a,a5'o ORIFICE #1, i.750 !,E a Atli 57 - I.E ill' 440RIS1 4TR•89 e+ IN ORWIDE PLATE II 18'm RISE I SEE RISER 3 I.Eq19.17, 1TO 410.03 EAST POND (PLAN VIEW) B PE f'-72`0 SCALE: 1' ='_' f t H = LID' 1.0' 41111.93 TO SHEAR GATE a 4 j 1�r 1 g IN INVERT / a7B-t7--' F 0 N0.72 i. STANDARD GALVANIZED !, STEEL LADDER/STEPS FRAME & LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET - SEE NOTE 2 FRAME & GRATE EL = 4Ei-B9- 420.83 ROUND SOLID COVER MARKED DRAIN" WITH LOCKING BOLTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. I.E. - 49649; 425.94 GROUT (TYP.) 2470 RISER SEE NOTE #3 ORIFICE 11, 6.6K I.E. =1E F.B9 424.0' OFCFICE #$ 4.Il I.E.-B 9' SHEAR G I.E _ ♦24 V 1 GATE VALVE xERATINC STEM I.E. = i4+BB, 9'0 420.87 SOLD LOCKING FRAME & COVER MARKED -DRAW RIM - %32-98- 431.92 STANDARD FRAME W/ VANED GRATE #8 GALVANIZED STEPS STEPS - METAL OR PLASTIC SEE NOTE #3 �'ALHOUISE INLET 429.82t OVERFLOW ELEV= 1/2'a BARS ® 5' D.C. CB. *1Z TYPE 9-4WO SCALE: 1' - 2'-0' I.E = i4690, � za"m 425.99 STA. 21 +51.04, 20.22' RT. LE=i2.06 0� g n az0ss WEST POND (PLAN VIEW) C.B. #26. TY2E_II772'o SCALE: 1' = 2' FRAME & LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET - SEE NOTE 2 FRAME & GRATE EL. = 4324)G. 431.92 r ROUND SOLID COVER MARKED / "DRAIN" WITH LOCKING BOLjIi. BY ENGINEER #8 G C.B. #10. TYPE *-48`0 Fs a TOP OF RISER PIPE SUPPORTS, NO. •'r AS O INLET � '� BOLTEDOR3IMB09 EDDIE 7Op OF R6FR . iaT7 430.07 PLAN VIEW Y IN WALL ® MAX. H = 1.0'429.78 C.B./24 3' SPACING MIN. ONE SUPPORT PIPE SUPPORTS, N0. AS Rwo. T.-Os GA aA "0 BOLTED OR IMBIEDOED 2 4-10-a I. 7' IN am-L • UAX. 4 76 1& 3' SPACING MIN. UPPER STEEL & ONE SOppp{0 - 1' SECTION OF PIPE 3/4" x 4' WIDE �. ATTACHED BY GASKET 240N12 BAND FOR REMOVAL 24� 4 I I I 44 V SECTION OF PIPE ATTACHED BY GASKET BAND FOR REMOVAL IE=425.94 Si�Ec11GL B4R5 INVERT - EL. = •4C6:99 425,99 18"0�12 HOOK Ci_P I8'0 SHEAR OATS'S ANCHORED TO C.B. RISER i To PVC POND OR" • • ,. C.B. RISER FILE BOTTOM PLATE IE-410a3 E. _ DwPc_ 1, s.W HOOK CLAIAP DETAIL 420.81, N NOT TO SCALE 420.96, S NOTES: ' g 1. FOR DIFFERENT 0 C B'S ADJUST DIMENSIONS TO MAINTAIN 45' ANGLE ON VERTICAL" BARS AND 7' O.C. MAX. SPACING OF BARS AROUND - - LOWER STEEL BAND. 2. METAL PARTS: CORROSION RESISTANT, STEEL PARTS GALVANIZED OWCE #BOTTOMS -PLATE I.E .�B . 408.31 EAST POND C.S k21Y PPE II- 72 FLOW RESTRICTOR w/ OL POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICE SCALE 1' = 2' SCALE 1' = T-R STA. 19+50, 20.22' RT. RIP -RAP PAD SURROUNDING C.B.'S� Y SPACED SEE DETNL OELCW+ 1. USE A MINIMUM OF A 540 TYPE 2 CATCH BASIN I [ STANDARD VFR/STEPS 2. OUTLET CAPACITY: 100-YEAR DEVELOPED PEAK FLOW. STEEL ` 1 3. METAL PARTS: COROSION RESISTANT. OVERFLOWL RISER DETAIL. ' PARTS GALVANINON-GIZZEDNIZED PIPE PARTS TOSHAVEED. ASPHALT FOR C.B. 424 AND C.B. *27 TREATMENT 1. NO D WEST POND 4. FRAME AND LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET SO: Gam. "S, TYPE 11-72"m A. CLFANOUT GATE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP. B. CUMB-DOWN SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER AND CLEANOUT GATE AS -BUILT CERTIFICATION: FLOW RESTR[CTOR WI C. FRAME IS CLEAR OF CURB. I HEREBY DECLARE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE OL POLLUTXW CONTROL DEV_1M 5, IF METAL OUTLET PIPE CONNECTS TO CEMENT CONCRETE PIPE TO HAVE SMOOTH O.D. EQUAL TO THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE SCALE' 1" = y • PIPE: OUTLET CONCRETE PIPE I.D. LESS 1/4". AS -CONSTRUCTED CONDRIONS.' THIS CERTIFICATION IS BASED UPON WORK PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 6. PRONOi AT LEti ONE 3'x.090 GAUGE SUPPORT BRACKET GENERALLY ACCEPTED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AHONOREO TO CONCRETE WALL (MAXIMUM 3'-0" AMU SURVEYING PIZM1CTLCE. - VERTYJL SAACIHC) / f r� • -.-. , !%-- -- 7. LOCATE ELBOW RESTRICTOR(S) AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE R. SCOTT MACINTOSH, L.S. NO. 15661 MINIMUM CLEARANCE AS SHOWN. DATE: , 8, LOCATE ADDITIONAL LADDER RUNGS IN STRUCTURES USED AS ACCESS TO TANKS OR VAULTS TO ALLOW ACCESS WHEN CATCH BASIN IS FILLED WITH WATER. MAX) I 0.8. #22. TYPE 2-WO_ PP SCALE 1"=2' 3/4 THICK x 4 WIDE, LONG SMOOTH BARS WELDED BANDS TO UPPER & LOWER SPACED, SEE NOTE 1EjENLY PADVILIE A veal ACCESS BY WELOrNO i 17V065 BM4 TO [4) AS SHOW HINGECE OPPEPPER EHOS Ppovkm LOCWNG 'EE 4lOEM. ON LOM'ER END. LOC711E&( /P Kj 51195 OIRECIi LY BELOW. �p y tx SEE NOTE } n PLAN VIEW C.B.027 QW FL.EV. _�, OVERFLOW ELLV. - ye9.5- LOWER STEEL BAND 314' THICK x C WIDE FORMED TO FIT IN GROOVE OF C.B. RISER SID. GALVANIZED STEPS C.B. TYPE 2-64• 423.98 410.15 i.L.. /4*y4; 2i'9 N72 - W 417.11 LE - *&&50r30'n N12 [C.0424) 405.69 BOT7ON = 415-6a [C& WARNWG BOTroM = a03-SD [CB#2+) THE EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. DEPTH IS UNKNOWN. CALL 1-800-424-5555. WARNING CONSTRUCTION IS WITHIN THE VICINITY OF A HIGH PRESSURE GAS LINE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH PUGS SOUND ENERGY. PERMIT NO. BSP98-0003 ,o CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AS -BUILT ) I REVI¢r4N3 1a. Puux.nnNrarz a va ro co.T.w. r9 y /ss ys,ra m c.orw. i7/99 y:sa� ro curve y As-But- M/ao E ® tS$auI x ui W 0 0 � al N 01 z o D v is V w m m3� m m � 5 m omm 8 0 m v e n LL v I Z L O J z x Y p 3 aN aQ W a a0ri cc(1LL .� Q LL cr Un J6 Q f- J Q DW cc o za :3 U' v T T ��//�� J 3 OW J a Wi O a� U JOB NO.: 191-41-872 DWG NAME: AB-SD-14 mcsr m MY1 EBB DRAWN BY: im. CHECKED BY: DATE: -S-w W*E n C-15 15 OF 1//SHEETS