Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
18-100123
CITY of yam. Federal Way September 28, 2018 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: File #18-100123-SU; BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL Greenline Lakefront BLA, 327XX Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor The City of Federal Way has completed an administrative review of the above -referenced Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application. The Department of Community Development hereby approves the 10-page survey drawing titled `Boundary Line Adjustment for Federal Way Campus LLC" prepared by ESM, resubmitted on May 3, 2018, July 31, 2018, and September 19, 2018. = BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to alter the interior lot lines between five Lots in the Corporate Park-1 (CP-1) zone. The existing and proposed lot areas of the, five parcels before and after adjustment are shown in the tables below. No buildings exist on new lot numbers 1, 2, 4, or 5. There is one small building on new lot number 3. AREAS PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT Parcel Label Area (Acres) Area (Square Feet) Parcel BLA3-1 19.721 Acres 859,050 S.F. Parcel BLA2-3 26.190 Acres 1,140,820 S.F. (See Breakdown Below) Portion West of Weyerhaeuser Way South = 21.179 Acres 922,545 S.F. Portion East of Weyerhaeuser Way South = 5.011 Acres 218,275 S.F. Parcel F 26.764 Acres 1,165,835 S.F. (See Breakdown Below) Portion North of Dept. of Game Parcel = 6.564 Acres 285,940 S.F. Portion South of Dept. of Game Parcel = 20.200 Acres 879,895 S.F. Parcel J 0.429 Acres 18,670 S.F. Parcel L 0.767 Acres 33,430 S.F. Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 2 of 3 September 28, 2018 Lot Label Lot 1 Lot 2 ' Lot 3., Lot 4 Lot 5 DECISIONAL CRITERIA AREAS AFTER ADJUSTMENT Area (Acres) Area (Square Feet) 6.564 Acres 285,940 S.F. 16.380 Acres 713,520 S.F. 10.026 Acres 436,730 S.F. 19.336 Acres 842,260 S.F. 21.564 Acres 939,340 S.F. City staff has determined the BLA meets decisional criteria set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 18.10: The BLA is an alteration in the location of lot boundaries on existing lots. The BLA will not increase the number of lots, nor diminish the size of open space or other protected environments. A critical areas report was submitted, "Existing Conditions Report Greenline Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) by Talasaea Consultants Qanuary 8, 2018). The report was peer reviewed and documented in June 5, 2018, and September 11, 2018, memos by the city's consultant, ESA. The wetland delineations, ratings, and buffers have been reviewed and are shown on the BLA drawing. 2. The BLA will not diminish the size of any lot so as to result in a lot of less square footage than required in the CP-1 zoning district. The 1994 Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) for the subject property does not contain a prescriptive minimum lot size for the CP-1 zone. The BLA will not result in the reduction of setbacks or lot coverage to less than required in the CP-1 zoning district. In the CZA for the subject property, no setbacks are specified for the CP-1 zone, except for the continuous Managed Forest Buffer (MFB) to be provided around the entire perimeter of the CP- 1 property, which is unaffected by the BLA. The MFB is not required to be depicted on the BLA map. The CZA contains a lot coverage standard of 70 percent of the total CP-1 zoned property, which is unaffected by the BLA. 4. Under the pre-BLA conditions, one of the parcels was segregated by a public right-of-way (Weyerhaeuser Way South). In addition, under pre-BLA conditions, one of the parcels was bisected by the existing Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife parcel. In post-BLA conditions, none of the revised parcels are segregated by public right-of-ways or other parcels. RECORDING Pursuant to FWRC 18.10.060, all boundary line adjustments shall be recorded with the King County Division of Elections and Records. One signed mylar or paper original BLA shall now be submitted to the city for appropriate city signatures. We will provide you the original BLA map for recording when it is signed by the Public Works and Community Development Directors. 18-100123-00-SU Doc. LD. 78281 Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 3 of 3 September 28, 2018 The applicant will record the BLA. Please return one conformed recorded copy original to the Community Development Departrnent, immediately after recording. No changes to the BLA document are allowed following city signature. If the county recording process necessitates revisions to the BLA map, you must request and receive approval of any changes from city staff prior to recording. CLOSING The BLA is approved based on the decisional criteria above. This land use decision does not waive compliance v'rith future City, of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Senior Planner Jim Harris at 253-835-2652, or jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, r I Brian Davis Community Development Director c: Jim Harris, Scnior Planner Robert "Doc" fianaen, Planning Manager Kevin Peterson, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Brian Asbury, Lalcehaven Water & Sewer District Tom Messmer, tjnW. m _ [t i t'trini aingro p-co Doa LA 78281 18-100123-00-SU 5309 Shilshole Avenue, NW EL A Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789,9658 phone 206.789.9684 tax memorandum date September 11, 2018 to Jim Harris, City of Federal Way Department of Community Development env w.esassoc.com from Jessica Redman and Ilon Logan subject Review of the Letter titled "Technical Comments Response Greenline Lakefront BLA 328** Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way" (letter dated July 31, 2018) and associated BLA maps. At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Environmental Science Associates (ESA) reviewed wetland determinations and the existing conditions report prepared by Talasaea Consultants Inc. for the property at approximately 32820 32nd Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington. The 74-acre site is a combination of 5 parcels (King County Tax Parcel Numbers 1521049178, 1621049056, 7978200520, 1621049030, and 2285000010) currently owned by Federal Way Campus, LLC. No development proposals or critical areas impacts were included in the report. Two site visits were conducted by ESA staff to verify wetland boundaries established by Talasaea. Generally, ESA agreed with the delineated boundaries marked by Talasaea. Results of ESA's review were presented in the memorandum titled Existing Conditions Report Review —Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) (dated April 4, 2018). The memorandum and field review only focused on two of the five parcels (Parcel F and J) as critical areas on the other three parcels were addressed under previous applications including the Tech Center BLA and Greenline Headquarters BLA projects. In response to ESA's April 4, 2018 memorandum, Talasaea provided a letter titled Existing Conditions Report Review Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Response to Comments dated 4 April 2018 (dated April 20, 2018), a revised version of the Existing Conditions Report (Revised April 20, 2018), and surveyed BLA maps (ESM Consulting Engineers, dated May 2, 2018). ESA reviewed these revised materials and presented our findings to the City in a memorandum titled dated June 5, 2018. The only recommendation ESA provided was that the BLA maps be revised to show the correct 200-foot buffer for Wetland CD. No additional revisions to the Existing Conditions Report were necessary. In response to ESA's June 5, 2018 memorandum, ESM Consulting Engineers provided the letter titled Technical Comments Response Greenline Lakefront BLA 328** Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way" (dated July 31, 2018) and revised BLA maps (dated July 19, 2019). ESA reviewed the BLA maps to ensure that the revision to the buffer of Wetland CD was correctly reflected on these submittal documents. After review of these documents, ESA has concluded that the comment and recommendation presented in our June 5, 2018 memorandum has been accurately and sufficiently addressed and therefore, we have no further comments or recommendations on the Greenline Lakefront — Existing Conditions Report or BLA maps. Please let us know if you have any questions about our review or this memorandum. July 31, 2018 NSU LTING ENO INJEER5 LLC RESUBMITTED Mr. Jim Harris JUL 31 2018 Job No. 1886-001-016-0022 City of Federal Way OOy pF FEDERAL. VYAy 33325 81h Avenue S COMMUWN DEVELOPMENT; Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Re: File #18-100123-SU; Technical Comments Response Greenline Lakefront BLA 328** Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Harris: ESM is in receipt of your Technical Comments email dated June 21, 2018. On behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC has reviewed your comments and provided our responses in bold text below. 1) See attached June 5, 2018 ESA Review memo and address the ESA required revisions on final BLA map. ESM and Talasaea reviewed ESA's comments and have adjusted the buffer for Wetland CD to be 200 feet as shown on the enclosed BLA plans. No revisions to the Critical Areas Report were required. Additionally, direct responses to ESA's comment memo was not required. 2) Item number 5 of my April 5, 2018 1st technical review letter was not adequately addressed in your May 3, 2018 resubmittal. To address this comment, sheet 2, note 2 of the BLA map needs to also include the revision date of the Talasaea report April 20, 2018. Sheet 2 note 2 has been revised to read: EXISTING WETLANDS AND BUFFERS DEPICTED HEREIN WERE DELINEATED AND CLASSIFIED BY TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. AS DEFINED IN THAT "EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - LAKEFRONT BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT (PARCELS F, J, L, BLA 2-3, AND BLA 3-1) - FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC - FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON" DATED JANUARY 8, 2018 (REVISED APRIL 20, 2018). 3) Make the text addition to the BLA map that you proposed in item number 3 of your May 3, 2018 letter. A note has been added to Sheet 2. Note 3 reads: APPROVAL OF A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT IS NOT AA GUARANTEE THAT FUTURE PERMITS WILL BE 33400 Bth Ave S Ste 205 Tet (253) 838 6113 Everett (425) 297 9900 Civil tnginee, i.., Land Planning Federal Way, WA 98003 Fax (253) 838 7104 Tott Free (800) 345 5694 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture www esmcivit corn 3D Laser Scanning GIS Mr. Jim Harris July 31, 2018 Page 2 GRANTED FOR ANY STRUCTURE OR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN A LOT AFFECTED BY A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT. As part of this response to the 2nd Round of Technical Comments, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is providing the following materials for review: 1) This Response Letter 2) Revised BLA Map (2 copies) 3) CD containing PDF of above listed items If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 253- 838-6113. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC MATT REIDER Assistant Planner Enc. Ilesm8lenghesm-jobsU 88610011016-00221documentl1etter-003.docx Jim Harris From: Jim Harris Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 3:04 PM To: matt.reider@esmcivil.com Cc: Kevin Peterson Subject: Greenline Lakefront BLA 2nd Round technical review comments file 18 100123 SU Attachments: ESA June 5 201 response memo-Greenline Lakefront BLA_2018_0605.docx Matt: This is the City staff 2"d technical review of Greenline Lakefront BLA, submitted on May 3, 2018. To expedite this to you, I am just providing these comments by email. Just a couple minor items need to be addressed then we can get to a BLA decision. 1. See attached June 5, 2018 ESA review memo and address the ESA required revisions on final BLA map. 2. Item number 5 of my April 5, 2018 15t technical review letter was not adequately addressed in your May 3, 2018 resubmittal. To address this comment, sheet 2, note 2 of the BLA map needs to also include the revision date of the Talasaea report April 20, 2018. 3. Make the text addition to the BLA map that you proposed in item number 3 of your May 3, 2018 letter. ,�/X Please make these changes and submit two copies of the revised BLA map to the permit center with a green resubmittal sheet, and we will move forward with the BLA decision. Let me know if you have any questions. Jim Harris Planner Wv OR Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2652 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com Office Hours Mon - Thur, 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM or by appointment 1 ESA memorandum date June 5, 2018 5309 Shilshole Avenue, NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax to Jim Harris, City of Federal Way Department of Community Development www.esassoc.com from Jessica Redman and Ilon Logan subject Review of the Letter titled "Existing Conditions Report Review Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Response to Comments dated 4 April 2018" (letter dated April 20, 2018) and associated BLA maps. At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Environmental Science Associates (ESA) reviewed wetland determinations and the existing conditions report prepared by Talasaea Consultants Inc. for the property at approximately 32820 32"d Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington. The 74-acre site is a combination of 5 parcels (King County Tax Parcel Numbers 1521049178, 1621049056, 7978200520, 1621049030, and 2285000010) currently owned by Federal Way Campus, LLC. No development proposals or critical areas impacts were included in the report. Two site visits were conducted by ESA staff to verify wetland boundaries established by Talasaea. Generally, ESA agreed with the delineated boundaries marked by Talasaea. Results of ESA's review were presented in the memorandum titled Existing Conditions Report Review —Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) (dated April 4, 2018). The memo and field review only focused on two of the five parcels (Parcel F and J) as critical areas on the other three parcels were addressed under previous applications including the Tech Center BLA and Greenline Headquarters BLA projects. In response to the April 4, 2018 memorandum, Talasaea provided a letter titled Existing Conditions Report Review Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Response to Comments dated 4 April 2018 (dated April 20, 2018), a revised version of the Existing Conditions Report (Revised April 20, 2018), and surveyed BLA maps (ESM Consulting Engineers, dated May 2, 2018). After review of these documents, ESA has the following comment and recommendation regarding the revised submittal materials. Comment: According to the Greenline Lakefront BLA — Feature Summary Table in Appendix D of the revised report, the standard buffer for Wetland CD is 200 feet per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 15 — Shoreline Management. However, Sheet 7 of the BLA maps exhibits a buffer of 165 feet for Wetland CD. Recommendation: We agree that Wetland CD is a Category I wetland per FWRC 15.10.250(1) and is allotted a 200-foot buffer per FWRC 15.10.250(2). We recommend the BLA maps be revised to reflect the correct buffer of 200 feet. Review of the Letter titled "Existing Conditions Report Review Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Response to Comments dated 4 April 2018" (letter dated April 20, 2018) and associated BLA maps. Outside of the above comment and recommendation, we have concluded that the remainder of our comments and recommendations presented in our April 4, 2018 memo have been accurately and sufficiently addressed in both the Existing Conditions Report — Lakefr°ont Boundary Line Adjustment and the associated BLA maps. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 22, 2018 TO: Kevin Peterson, PW Development Services FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: NA FILE NUMBER(s): 18-100123-00-SU RELATED FILE NOS_: None PROJECT NAME: GREENLINE LAKEFRONT BLA PROJECT ADDRESS: 32820 WEYERHAEUSER WAY S ZONING DISTRICT: CP-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Boundary line adjustment to allocate property along North Lake for conservation of natural environment and to adjust existing parcel boundaries so that they do not cross Weyerhaeuser Way S. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT: ERIC LABRIE MATERIALS SUBMITTED: See attached resubmittal sheet copy - I gave you one of each except revised Wetland report, as only two were submitted. t _.1 01 - o OL lei � $ e� �zW$ e�S � IL 8 �w F aye G- e E O 4.J1.a Qi " Ri wUc qq INSa ag a cgs Y 9 N g u m a ��o j 1 d A4 V. "&� sE ,i2bo�]� mea h xok ors �+ C]" S AVM H3Sf9V54tl3A3M 'l n [ i •te e ' Hill—ry If INN o o g II oa_ u F 8 p P g¢g ra`.$� Rgej U T a H'I Q g8 � � � y i� I -��► � �k�� Ig��,� I I - i aw'wcc�w. - �f u, p b.,- Y � � �r '= ��'� - L - , _ 1 giI' - -a cq 2 ra, �v.0 s• 3 �[yy y'L_ 3a` W s �' d i �_ FLY} I y a�J d ss 56 GRN �^ ❑ �tqg its Z 8a� s r$ r ryy{ae. a IrtTh 11 I I` _21g W •-Y = 'v A� qj "(f � 1N,yn [,� 4. - 1 J[5,.10 k iRl{lq ,ffs/9, LU RN hml .{G2NC a .Oy'1•Ip • S W Za^ MR N-2 Q Z wVi' a j J Q fig„ , q t Y 7 (31 .il'pylC i[1.El.lON yCENZ i.a.K101 Oa O (obii .[dOCf1 3tt.1 E.10,' I ', Ifliz 03�bz0a a" } fia— s IN p N _ fill ! W8 3LY�rw` p �H! •a�.csn w >11 W Z � o � N � QN3N z LOit �iL �o 8z^�oz z m5Y. 3� 0 tago _ s W U i ilk I R.o off^ 0., Rtj o 0 S i EE 6 H Q a�i 2 o g > nY N R W jig SDI fl 5 F is a uay'a.� 03 [ O i m g ce m s gx E a _ i . � � p �M' (1331LLS ,11GS S a uirl,de 93 ( T f Pp E g C YtcmO HlllfalY; c EE 4_ $ rw ,ocax ` mnm$ tF $c 01 �hkax -w—LL s .nca i S.ciiu�u� _ iE€ °fin 0 Oz ) (.-e1a f E CIW OF Federal Way WETLANDS CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: February 14, 2018 Consultant: ESA Ilon Logan 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 ilogan ,a'�esassoc.coiu Project: Existing Conditions Report Greenline Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 dated 8 January 2018 Location: East of Weyerhaeuser Way (west side of North Lake) City File No.: 18-100123 SU Applicant Contact: Talasaea City Staff Contact: Jim Harris, Planner — 253.835.2652, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com Documents Provided: • Existing Conditions Report — Greenline Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1. Link to Talasaea Wetland Report Existing Conditions Report ftp://ftp.cityoffederalway.com/Outbox/Greeniiiic%20Submittal%20Docu ments/ Task Scope: Verify wetland delineations and classification of all wetlands. FWRC Chapter 15.10 applies to critical areas within 200 feet of the shoreline (SMA) jurisdiction of Northlake. FWRC Chapter 19.145 (current code) applies to critical areas outside the 200-foot SMA jurisdiction. • Review wetland delineation for conformance with requirements of FWRC. ■ Meet or phone conversation with City staff prior to review. • Conduct site visit as necessary. • Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request Task Schedule: Task Cost: Acceptance: additional information from applicant if needed. • Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. • Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. • Confirm wetlands and boundaries are properly shown on final BLA drawings after confirmation of delineation and classification. Provide task cost estimate ASAP. Review work is not authorized until authorized in writing by City. Not to exceed $ 8,905 without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. 2/20/2018 (Consultant - ESA) Date (Applicant) PO 8 411 a -� a �-1 -I_ 9[ ac- m aF I Cr"ri aE z ar M rr,I -X- _� m � � a m I- I if 9F o m C 9(..Ir 11 11 F n 6 -p * r n -* I cf] 9F H C7 -E rF r x mED ; r CO ao # ac- + aE Op a'� j ,?[ o i -H of Cn C n *- -X- m ' 7F o � o * f /V F� 2oN 8 Date r% � 3 CD � N O CU z M m c� o 0 CD COn7 D # QCD iF I r CCn � CO -YE- � � 0 N r+ CO m m V o w w� � f- mw -H-Iv CID o �[- d xx "x' a w -c r-- II C CD p� '`F rNC7o CH7 T Z II i T C M C�II - D C7b H H �' m 1 02 I T x iV ro o � x x o CD a °7 ' 3 x `' a -DO i p iF o C7-� C r p 1--- -Z: r z a i � m� n o a co rm ; c 4a CO Ln n, � -x. a r-, f Wo { m l0 can CO CO Lh c7 �, CD I tD .x. Wad -lE r LrT o o m ESA1 J memorandum date June 5, 2018 5309 Shilshole Avenue, NW Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 phone 206.789.9684 fax to Jim Harris, City of Federal Way Department of Community Development www.esassoc.com from Jessica Redman and Ilon Logan subject Review of the Letter titled "Existing Conditions Report Review Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Response to Comments dated 4 April 2018" (letter dated April 20, 2018) and associated BLA maps. At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Environmental Science Associates (ESA) reviewed wetland determinations and the existing conditions report prepared by Talasaea Consultants Inc. for the property at approximately 32820 32"d Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington. The 74-acre site is a combination of 5 parcels (King County Tax Parcel Numbers 1521049178, 1621049056, 7978200520, 1621049030, and 2285000010) currently owned by Federal Way Campus, LLC. No development proposals or critical areas impacts were included in the report. Two site visits were conducted by ESA staff to verify wetland boundaries established by Talasaea. Generally, ESA agreed with the delineated boundaries marked by Talasaea. Results of ESA's review were presented in the memorandum titled Existing Conditions Report Review — Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) (dated April 4, 2018). The memo and field review only focused on two of the five parcels (Parcel F and J) as critical areas on the other three parcels were addressed under previous applications including the Tech Center BLA and Greenline Headquarters BLA projects. In response to the April 4, 2018 memorandum, Talasaea provided a letter titled Existing Conditions Report Review Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Response to Comments dated 4 April 2018 (dated April 20, 2018), a revised version of the Existing Conditions Report (Revised April 20, 2018), and surveyed BLA maps (ESM Consulting Engineers, dated May 2, 2018). After review of these documents, ESA has the following comment and recommendation regarding the revised submittal materials. Comment: According to the Greenline Lakefront BLA — Feature Summary Table in Appendix D of the revised report, the standard buffer for Wetland CD is 200 feet per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 15 — Shoreline Management. However, Sheet 7 of the BLA maps exhibits a buffer of 165 feet for Wetland CD. Recommendation: We agree that Wetland CD is a Category I wetland per FWRC 15.10.250(1) and is allotted a 200-foot buffer per FWRC 15.10.250(2). We recommend the BLA maps be revised to reflect the correct buffer of 200 feet. Review of the Letter titled "Existing Conditions Report Review Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Response to Comments dated 4 April 2018" (letter dated April 20, 2018) and associated BLA maps. Outside of the above comment and recommendation, we have concluded that the remainder of our comments and recommendations presented in our April 4, 2018 memo have been accurately and sufficiently addressed in both the Existing Conditions Report — Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment and the associated BLA maps. TIN 0 11 May 3, 2018 Job No. 1886-001-016-0022 RESUBMITTED Mr. Jim Harris MAY 0 3 2018 City of Federal Way CrTY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 81h Avenue S COMMUNrTY DEVELOPMENT Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Re: File #18-100123-SU; Technical Comments Response Greenline Lakefront BLA, 328** Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Harris: ESM is in receipt of your Technical Comments letter dated April 5, 2018. On behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC has reviewed your comments and provided our responses in bold text below. 1) Please show how existing Parcels J and L are legal lots. Specifically, please identify how each of these lots meets each criterion (a-d) in Federal Way Revised Code tu,j yV� (FWRC) 19.105.0100). Under King County code, 19A08.070(B.1.) a lot created before October 1,1972, shall NN be recognized as a legal lot Since this property was King County prior to being annexed into the City in 1994, we believe that requirement would still apply. a) It was created or segregated pursuant to all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations then in effect. ~ Parcel J has been a legal lot since at least 1969 when it was conveyed from Clyde 7 and Laura Currie to Mobilhaven, a trust, who subsequently co vrr�eyed the parcel to Weyerhaeuser (see Statutory Warranty Deed with Recording No. 6460292). ParHisf a State Plat that was created in 1946. A deed from 1966 &-Lof Washington sold it as an individual lot A deed for the tract to the south from 1971 states that the property was residential at that time (see Deed with Recording No. 6060098). b) Except as specified in subsection (2) of this section, it is at least as large as the minimum lot size established by this title. w,,rJ l SILA- ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 Sth Ave S, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 253.838.6113tel 425.297.9900tel 3D Laser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694 toll free www.esmcivil.com 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax Mr. Jim Harris May 3, 2018 Page 2 There is not a minimum lot size for these parcels as established by Title 19 (CP-01 Zone); however, buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. Parcel L is encumbered by wetlands and associated buffers and thus does not provide a minimum building footprint Parcel J is also encumbered by wetlands and associated buffers and thus does not provide a minimum building foot print Parcel J and Parcel L are going to increase in lot area after the BLA and, therefore, become more buildable than what currently exists. Parcel J becomes Lot 2 an Parcel L becomes Lot 3 after the BLA Parcel J increases from 0.429 acres to 16.38 acres and Parcel L increases from 0.767 acres to 10.026 acres (as identified on BLA Map Sheet 2 of 10). c) It is adjacent to a street, access tract, or driveway providing access to that lot or parcel that meets the minimum requirements of the International Fire Code and other code provisions established by or under this title. Parcel J once had access from Weyerhaeuser Way S via 32"d Avenue S which was vacated per Ordinance No. 6801 dated May 29,1984 and recorded under Recording No. 8407180415. Parcel L once had access from 30t' Avenue S (Vacated ROW) which is now an ? easement for water mains (see Easement; Recording No. 8104290757). s d) Nothing in the above subsections eliminates the requirement to comply with all other provisions of the FWRC, or other applicable regulations, prior to obtaining a building permit or other construction permit. The owner and applicant understand these requirements. 2) Remove the reference to the Managed Forest Buffer on all sheets. The Managed �= Forest Buffer was not shown on the three prior BLA's for the Campus and should not be depicted on this BLA for consistency. Reference to the Managed Forest Buffer has been removed from all of the sheets. 3) Please identify where there is a feasible building envelope for proposed lot 1, as this lot appears to have minimal building potential due to the wetlands and wetland buffers. You can provide this on the BLA and/or in a separate depiction for clarity. A separate exhibit has been prepared and included with this resubmittal. The existing Parcel F (prior to BLA) is already made up of two separate parcels which are separated by the State parcel. By the proposed BLA, we are designating these as two separate parcels as two separate "legal" lots. Th o i at-the5D v are building lots. Other jurisdictions address that point and —we would be willing to add- the following note if the City desires: "Approval of a boundary line adjustment is -{ not a guarantee that future permits will be granted for any structure or development � q�d bN\ VY- Mr. Jim Harris May 3, 2018 Page 3 within a lot affected by a boundary line adjustment". Note is off Pierce County BLA standard template. 4) Please see the enclosed ESA Report Review for the Lakefront BLA dated April 1. 2018 and address all comments as appropriate. Resubmit 2 copies of any resubmitted information from Talasaea in response to the ESA review comments. Comments have been addressed by Talasaea and are included with their revised Existing Conditions Report 5) The BLA map will need to include and identify the full title and final date of the Talasaea Consultants Wetland Delineation (Existing Conditions Report) once the final delineation and classification is accepted by the City Wetland Consultant. H Talasaea revised the Existing Conditions Report pursuant to comments received 1[ from the City of Federal Way and their third -party review consultants, ESA The rJ- [u revision is dated April 20, 2018. 6) The BLA map will need to be revised to include the final wetland delineations and 701 corresponding buffers. The BLA map has been updated pursuant to revisions provided by Talasaea which d are based off of comments received from the City of Federal Way and ESA 7) Add the City file number in the space provided in the upper left-hand corner of the title block. j�4 File numbers have been added to the revised BLA Map as requested. '1 P,j{ y 8) There are two sheets 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the BLA drawings. Correct the page 1 numbering. The topographical sheets have been provided with the first submittal of BLAs in the past, however, these topographical sheets historically have not been part of the recorded BLA Other than the first submittal, topographical sheets have not been included in the re -submittals. This is not unlike plats where the City requires topography as part of the review package, but the plat is recorded without topography, so that a clear and concise map is recorded that defines the lots being created. The revised BLA map contains sheets with and without topography. Sheets showing topography (7-10) have been included for the sake of review but will not be included with the final mylar. As part of this response to the VI Round of Technical Comments, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is providing the following materials for review: N.<l d ISMi Mr. Jim Harris May 3, 2018 Page 4 1) Revised BLA Map (2 copies) 2) Revised Existing Conditions Report including Responses to ESA (2 copies) 3) Packet containing copies of recorded documents listed in the Title Report from Chicago Title dated 12/29/2017 (2 copies) If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 253- 838-6113. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC /U A.- '�— , MATT REIDER Assistant Planner Enc. islesm-jobs1188610011016-00221documentlletter-002.docx , &/ ��� t CJl 6V �lLl Lech �C' �w �� TING 9 4 W May 3, 2018 Job No. 1886-001-016-0022 RESUBMI17ED Mr. Jim Harris MAY 0 3 2018 City of Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 81h Avenue S XMMUNr1Y DEVELOPMENT Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Re: File #18-100123-SU; Technical Comments Response Greenline Lakefront BLA, 328** Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Harris: ESM is in receipt of your Technical Comments letter dated April 5, 2018. On behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC has reviewed your comments and provided our responses in bold text below. 1) Please show how existing Parcels J and L are legal lots. Specifically, please identify how each of these lots meets each criterion (a-d) in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.105.010(1 ). Under King County code, 19AO8.070(B.1.) a lot created before October 1,1972, shall be recognized as a legal lot Since this property was King County prior to being annexed into the City in 1994, we believe that requirement would still apply. a) It was created or segregated pursuant to all applicable laws, ordinances and regulations then in effect. Parcel J has been a legal lot since at least 1969 when it was conveyed from Clyde and Laura Currie to Mobilhaven, a trust, who subsequently conveyed the parcel to Weyerhaeuser (see Statutory Warranty Deed with Recording No. 6460292). Parcel L is Tract 53 of a State Plat that was created in 1946. A deed from 1966 shows that the State of Washington sold it as an individual lot A deed for the tract to the south from 1971 states that the property was residential at that time (see Deed with Recording No. 6060098). b) Except as specified in subsection (2) of this section, it is at least as large as the minimum lot size established by this title. ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 253.838.6113tel 425.297.9900tel 3D Laser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694 toll free www.esmcivil.com 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax Mr. Jim Harris May 3, 2018 Page 2 There is not a minimum lot size for these parcels as established by Title 19 (CP-01 Zone); however, buildable area will be determined by other site development requirements, i.e., required buffers, parking lot landscaping, surface water facilities, etc. Parcel L is encumbered by wetlands and associated buffers and thus does not provide a minimum building footprint Parcel J is also encumbered by wetlands and associated buffers and thus does not provide a minimum building foot print Parcel J and Parcel L are going to increase in lot area after the BLA and, therefore, become more buildable than what currently exists. Parcel J becomes Lot 2 and Parcel L becomes Lot 3 after the BLA Parcel J increases from 0.429 acres to 16.38 acres and Parcel L increases from 0.767 acres to 10.026 acres (as identified on BLA Map Sheet 2 of 10). c) It is adjacent to a street, access tract, or driveway providing access to that lot or parcel that meets the minimum requirements of the International Fire Code and other code provisions established by or under this title. Parcel J once had access from Weyerhaeuser Way S via 32"d Avenue S which was vacated per Ordinance No. 6801 dated May 29,1984 and recorded under Recording No. 8407180415. Parcel L once had access from 30"' Avenue S (Vacated ROW) which is now an easement for water mains (see Easement, Recording No. 8104290757). d) Nothing in the above subsections eliminates the requirement to comply with all other provisions of the FWRC, or other applicable regulations, prior to obtaining a building permit or other construction permit. The owner and applicant understand these requirements. 2) Remove the reference to the Managed Forest Buffer on all sheets. The Managed Forest Buffer was not shown on the three prior BLA's for the Campus and should not be depicted on this BLA for consistency. Reference to the Managed Forest Buffer has been removed from all of the sheets. 3) Please identify where there is a feasible building envelope for proposed lot 1, as this lot appears to have minimal building potential due to the wetlands and wetland buffers. You can provide this on the BLA and/or in a separate depiction for clarity. A separate exhibit has been prepared and included with this resubmittal. The existing Parcel F (prior to BLA) is already made up of two separate parcels which are separated by the State parcel. By the proposed BLA, we are designating these as two separate parcels as two separate "legal" lots. There is no claim that these are building lots. Other jurisdictions address that point and we would be willing to add the following note if the City desires: "Approval of a boundary line adjustment is not a guarantee that future permits will be granted for any structure or development Mr. Jim Harris May 3, 2018 Page 3 within a lot affected by a boundary line adjustment'. Note is off Pierce County BLA standard template. 4) Please see the enclosed ESA Report Review for the Lakefront BLA dated April 4, 2018 and address all comments as appropriate. Resubmit 2 copies of any resubmitted information from Talasaea in response to the ESA review comments. Comments have been addressed by Talasaea and are included with their revised Existing Conditions Report 5) The BLA map will need to include and identify the full title and final date of the Talasaea Consultants Wetland Delineation (Existing Conditions Report) once the final delineation and classification is accepted by the City Wetland Consultant. Talasaea revised the Existing Conditions Report pursuant to comments received from the City of Federal Way and their third -party review consultants, ESA The revision is dated April 20, 2018. 6) The BLA map will need to be revised to include the final wetland delineations and corresponding buffers. The BLA map has been updated pursuant to revisions provided by Talasaea which are based off of comments received from the City of Federal Way and ESA 7) Add the City file number in the space provided in the upper left-hand corner of the title block. File numbers have been added to the revised BLA Map as requested. 8) There are two sheets 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the BLA drawings. Correct the page numbering. The topographical sheets have been provided with the first submittal of BLAs in the past, however, these topographical sheets historically have not been part of the recorded BLA Other than the first submittal, topographical sheets have not been included in the re -submittals. This is not unlike plats where the City requires topography as part of the review package, but the plat is recorded without topography, so that a clear and concise map is recorded that defines the lots being created. The revised BLA map contains sheets with and without topography. Sheets showing topography (7-10) have been included for the sake of review but will not be included with the final mylar. As part of this response to the VI Round of Technical Comments, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is providing the following materials for review: Mr. Jim Harris May 3, 2018 Page 4 1) Revised BLA Map (2 copies) 2) Revised Existing Conditions Report including Responses to ESA (2 copies) 3) Packet containing copies of recorded documents listed in the Title Report from Chicago Title dated 12/29/2017 (2 copies) If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 253- 838-6113. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 1 MATT REIDER Assistant Planner Enc. isIesm-jobs1188610011016-00221documentlletter-002.docx x£�?N `al Y1•I.i 3618 >s' 1n) J NC" i2'�li 1B]015' (ESuI 3.7.T 28.8 M' I..) ]f • X. a� A � Y ✓•� A oplY R>yl 1'13Y E =�z� ��•V FOS.1L�• �� S Y _ BCIrry = in1 tlF 13FAROIGS: of A dil[e 7� 3GC �v 8�'• m •� WEVERHAEUSER WAY g-Rif 45 is X0Z Zog o Z 0�0D Zmpj oar (/AD� i D U m >r V)D c0 A•i, C j M = O z z m z t INC Or d II I I � I I y�2�� i •�Qj]'3�o a m' y o Jan - �2 CCf - ss p ze a q g s 7 4 2 x x0zm z wi x,'aa� zaw o,• l( a� 0 O J O ( noi•, z',zt xea° a' frs 1 O ') I D wraa•x.t zus.aa• Irsu) Z O { _ I> m tt sg t a �s cn z z �' �•..�r Pw �� �_ g$� � r 1 w' iv sea', a,Neal+ r . der=Rtly �0.�>n• � r Ll� — 4v!g$■y a_mwi SYS c 4p ■■ i 31 I gqyYSyy9 Ilk .F u � Yv— .� r�—_�11 RC'•� �—T I f� a 5 l�l^E lr F SSSSffff I � a��°''S � Y• t(� � 3 ` 0 vw o I I n S$ 9 I s IS -T WIS •0,'rrtl•l uv 3S ���_ � 9Cy A2 g gg I P sRti '� ', a rae+urur.x weemlmeu lob ~ sv i $'� , S sgx It !i�■ 17 r 777 i k N+EYERNAEUSER WAV $, gg _ x t it Sz m' o rr o o mSy SF m g£ig a N N C Z —4 3 Q o WIND N a c ` D— WETLAND BUFFER LOT 1 WETLAND BUFFER ,25' ROAD SETBACK (TYP. ///// n SCALE: 1 "=30' 30 15 0 30 60 LEGEND BUILDABLE AREA / v► v v /*/* WETLAND d CD 14 d w v� W W �► W � W rA � u z — I t! 'R 0 C 0 �^ m i N O V z r 7 co C rn H Q m o >3oul w W Q m V v m r 3 — � o Z au m '> n a U 0 m U co a IL (Q 3 c 3 00 S '0 3 c o Wn Z teaI 3 o 0 CITY OF Federal Way �:d on Opportunit April 5, 2018 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8"' Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Eric.labrie@esmcivil.com Re: File #18-100123-SU; TECHNICAL COMMENTS Greenline Lakefront BLA, 328XX Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: The City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development is in receipt of the above -referenced Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application. The proposal is to adjust the boundary lines for five lots between several parcels as identified on the BLA. City staff has completed technical review of your application. The following items must be addressed prior to the City approving the BLA application. Jim Harris, Planning Division, 253-835-2652, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com & Kevin Peterson, Public Works, 253-835-2734, kvin.peterson@cityoffederalway.com 1. Please show how existing Parcels J and L are legal lots. Specifically, please identify how each of these lots meets each criterion (a-d) in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.105.010(1). 2. Remove the reference to the Managed Forest Buffer on all sheets. The Managed Forest Buffer was not shown on the three prior BLA's for the Campus, and should not be depicted on this BLA for consistency. 3. Please identify where there is a feasible building envelope for proposed lot 1, as this lot appears to have minimal building potential due to the wetlands and wetland buffers. You can provide this on the BLA and/or in a separate depiction for clarity. 4, Please seethe enclosed ESA Report Review for the Lakefront BLA dated April 4, 2018, and address all comments as appropriate. Resubmit 2 copies of any resubmitted information from Talasaea in response to the ESA review comments. 5. The BLA map will need to include and identify the full title and final date of the Talasaea Consultants Wetland Delineation (Existing Conditions Report) once the final delineation and classification is accepted by the City Wetland Consultant. 6. The BLA map will need to be revised to include the final wetland delineations and corresponding buffers. Mr. LaBrie April 5, 2018 Page 2 7. Add the City file number in the space provided in the upper left-hand corner of the title block. 8. There are two sheets 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the BLA drawings. Correct the page numbering. CLOSING Once the revisions listed above are made, provide four paper copies of the BLA document with the enclosed Resubmittal Form, along with a letter explaining how the technical comments have been addressed. Pursuant to FWRC 18.05.080, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. Please contact me at jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2652, if you have questions regarding this letter or your application. Sincerely, r � Jim Harris Planner enc: Resubmirtal Form c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Tom Messmer, Federal Way Campus LLC, tmessmer@industrialrealtygroup.com 18-100123-00-SU Doc, I D. 77504 3 330=o ig IREsiw x nZpm �f Jx Gi C W D ,n •Ix't u' rorxx2 IroC Op N0131i�2 261B.N' (B,I) _ Z A w m Lfe th V p gg Z Z ` /diipp — ED �__ I� —M O1w MAW g$ ' X E,-' tv L11—a! IP mnab 6yar `+ 9 � �. wag ----- C_ rig. �? ai I 4` Iy�xE I I W! �n tP� ry jFr z �fi e r sari-r• $ 5 3 A � � � 915�i OF eEN7MF7&_ o� "3�5�� 0,1 � a3�'• � w o $ 3Y • - � } f p yy t� 0 WEg YERHAEUSER WAY / . yppg Ww avwrx►i ��' vg � p � v�JF ez 0 v v T T g Ns 3x Nam yc gla Ng 94 I M ENS m Smr 91 lu o r— CITY OF ti Federal Way February 21, 2018 Ilon Logan ESA Consultants 5309 Shilshole Ave NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 ' L CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor RE: File #18-100123-00-SU; AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH WETLAND REVIEW Greenline Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) Dear Ms. Logan: This letter authorizes ESA to conduct the review outlined in the Wetland Consultant Task Authorization for the Greenline Lakefront BLA (enclosed). I have enclosed a signed copy of the task authorization, which is not to exceed $8,905.00. Please initiate the work in the task authorization. Let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, aHarris Senior Planner ene: Signed Task Authorization Doc. I D 77323 CITY OF ...... � Federal Way Date: WETLANDS CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM February 14, 2018 Consultant: ESA Ilon Logan 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 ilogan a esassoc.com Project: Existing Conditions Report Greenline Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 dated 8 January 2018 Location: East of Weyerhaeuser Way (west side of North Lake) City File No.: 18-100123 SU Applicant Contact: Talasaea City Staff Contact: Jim Harris, Planner — 253.835.2652, jim.harris@cityoffederalway.com Documents Provided: + Existing Conditions Report — Greenline Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1. Link to Talasaea Wetland Report Existing Conditions Report ftp://ftp.ciiyoffederalway com/Outbox/Greenline%20Submittal°/Q20Docu ments/ Task Scope: Verify wetland delineations and classification of all wetlands. FWRC Chapter 15.10 applies to critical areas within 200 feet of the shoreline (SMA) jurisdiction of Northlake. FWRC Chapter 19.145 (current code) applies to critical areas outside the 200-foot SMA jurisdiction. • Review wetland delineation for conformance with requirements of FWRC. • Meet or phone conversation with City staff prior to review. • Conduct site visit as necessary. • Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request Task Schedule: Task Cost: Acceptance: additional information from applicant if needed. • Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. • Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. • Confirm wetlands and boundaries are properly shown on final BLA drawings after confirmation of delineation and classification. Provide task cost estimate ASAP. Review work is not authorized until authorized in writing by City. Not to exceed S 8.905 without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. 2/20/2018 (Consultant - ESA) Date (Applicant) f7 � n #� � n iF-W' CD3F 3 H A, H Z C7 +r- at- m 3F 3F -3 00 CO 3 cu o -al a � --X. r Q m w C7 ' + 7F II Il IJ c� m �. x ; o m a rM b H ,K ib i � Go �'7F Z m -M,i �� rri CO ' cn a C> o o m o o o axe fr- CDq o o o Date �c inn MCD H C-3 •1F a C7 C�7 .M m M?� °°B ww o a N c7 p n CI 11 1 m 'T'{==oo cr- Ui iF a CO -�{ T M I yE o� o � amC: o Z Q Cl't .H r— " lD m Ia: -x � � 0 CHJ m CO :a: D � psi .cR CDw CD { M CO C-a 4 i l0 O — CD iF —I CD f CDm CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 18, 2018 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Peteor Lawrenee, Plans EiI - Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Jim Harris FOR DRC MTG. ON: February 1, 2018 Committee Review Internal FILE NUMSER(s): 18-100123-00-SU RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: GREENLINE LAKEFRONT BLA PROJECT ADDRESS: 32820 WEYERHAEUSER WAY S ZONING DISTRICT: CP-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Boundary line adjustment to allocate property along North Lake for conservation of natural environment and to adjust existing parcel boundaries so that they do not cross Weyerhaeuser Way S. LAND USE PERMITS: BLA PROJECT CONTACT: TOM MESSMER MATERIALS SUBMITTED: BLA Plan Wetland Delineation Lot Closures Title Report ESM Cover Letter Easement Document RESUBMITTED JAN 10 201d MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION 4k DEPARRHCNT or CommuNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 3332.5 8's Avenue South ()OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 09 Federal Way 253-835- w.cit07; Fax 253-8�deralw 5Lco www.ciivaF'Federaiway.cam APPLICATION NO(S) Ie- 100)23- Occ)—-ScA ProjeetName Greenline Lakefront BLA Property Address/Location Parcel Number(s) Date I J ho) 1? SE Qtr of Section 16, Township 21, Range 4 and NW Qtr of Section 15, Township 21, Range 4 1521049178,1621049036, 1621049030, 7978200520, 22850000 10 Project Description PLEASE PRINT BLA to allocate property along North Lake for conservation of natural environment and to adjust existing parcel boundaries so that they do not cross Weyerhaeuser Way S. Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan x Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference. Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA wIPmject SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information CP-01 Zoning Designation Coorporate Park Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construc[ion Type Applicant Name: Tom Messmer c/o Federal Way Campus, LLC Address: 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90026 Phone: (310) 261-4382 Fax: Email:tmessrr rialrealtygroup.com Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Eric LaBrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Address: 334d0 8th Ave S, Suite 205 CttylStatc: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-838m6113 Fax: 253-838-7104 Email: eric.lab6e@esmclvil.com Signature: 2 Name: Tom Messmer do Federal Way Campus, LLG Address:11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite.850 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90025 Phone: (310) 261-4382 Fax: Email: tmessmer@industrialrealtygmup.com Signature: �] Bulletin #003 —January I, 201 I Page 1 of I k:lHandouts\Master Land Use Applicatia RESUaMI-IFTEC CfTY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CLOSURES FOR THE LAKEFRONT BLA FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS JANUARY 5, 2018 PRIOR TO BLA - PARCEL F NORTH North: 117004.6447 East: 1279326.8081 Line Course: S 89-05-51 E Length: 319.96 North: 116999.6051 East: 1279646.7284 Line Course: S 00-53-36 W Length: 857.07 North: 116142.6392 East: 1279633.3659 Line Course: N 89-08-10 W Length: 247.00 North: 116146.3633 East: 1279386.3939 Curve Length:92.11 Radius:67.00 Delta:78-46-15 Tangent:55.01 Chord: 85.03 Course: N 17-35-21 E Course In: N 33-01-32 W Course Out: N 68-12-13 E RP North: 116202.5379 East: 1279349.8781 End North: 116227.4157 East: 1279412.0882 Line Course: N 21-47-47 W Length: 38.69 North: 116263.3397 East: 1279397.7222 Curve Length:46.28 Radius:104.00 Delta:25-29-54 Tangent:23.53 Chord: 45.90 Course: N 09-02-50 W Course In: N 68-12-13 E Course Out: N 86-17-53 W RP North: 116301.9558 East: 1279494.2872 End North: 116308.6707 East: 1279390.5042 Curve Length:134.02 Radius:184.00 Delta: 41-43-55 Tangent: 70.14 Chord: 131.08 Course: N 17-09-50 W Course In: N 86-17-53 W Course Out: N 51-58-12 E RP North: 116320.5509 East: 1279206.8881 End North: 116433.9085 East: 1279351.8228 Line Course: N 38-01-48 W Length: 100.80 North: 116513.3075 East: 1279289.7225 Curve Length:34.08 Radius:58.00 Delta:33-39-50 Tangent:17.55 Chord: 33.59 Course: N 21-11-53 W Course In: N 51-58-12 E Course Out: S 85-38-02 W RP North: 116549.0398 East: 1279335.4084 End North: 116544.6243 Curve Length:217.09 Delta: 40-38-51 Chord: 212.56 Course In: S 85-38-02 W RP North:116521.3287 End North: 116737.7548 Line Course: N 45-00-49 W North: 116759.8396 Curve Length:61.45 Delta: 4-49-22 Chord: 61.43 Course In: N 47-03-37 W RP North: 117257.1364 End North: 116806.5304 Line Course: S 89-05-51 E North: 116806.3532 Curve Length:227.15 Delta: 17-36-41 Chord: 226.26 Course In: N 52-24-35 W RP North: 117257.1511 End North: 117004.6541 Line Course: S 06-06-58 E North: 117004.6441 East: 1279277.5767 Radius: 306.00 Tangent: 113.34 Course: N 24-41-23 W Course Out: N 44-59-11 E East: 1278972.4648 East: 1279188.7880 Length: 31.24 East: 1279166.6928 Radius: 730.00 Tangent: 30.74 Course: N 40-31-42 E Course Out: S 51-52-59 E East: 1278632.2811 East: 1279206.6104 Length: 11.25 East: 1279217.8590 Radius: 739.00 Tangent: 114.48 Course: N 28-47-04 E Course Out: S 70-01-16 E East: 1278632.2805 East: 1279326.8064 Length: 0.01 East :1279326.8075 Area: 285,938 sq.ft. 6.564 acres PRIOR TO BLA - PARCEL F SOUTH North: 115936.5390 Curve Length:687.32 Delta: 40-35-55 Chord: 673.03 Course In: S 80-22-31 E RP North: 115774.3606 End North: 116519.8484 Line Course: N 50-13-24 E North: 116696.0869 Curve Length:40.79 Delta: 3-12-04 Chord: 40.78 East: 1278551.8863 Radius: 970.00 Tangent: 358.80 Course: N 29-55-27 E Course Out: N 39-46-36 W East: 1279508.2326 East: 1278887.6297 Length: 275.46 East: 1279099.3329 Radius: 730.00 Tangent: 20.40 Course: N 48-37-22 E Course In: N 39-46-36 W RP North: 117257.1241 End North: 116723.0428 Line Course: S 45-00-49 E North: 116700.9581 Curve Length:180.20 Delta: 40-38-51 Chord: 176.44 Course In: S 44-59-11 W RP North: 116521.3103 End North: 116540.6471 Curve Length:64.63 Delta: 33-39-50 Chord: 63.70 Course In: N 85-38-02 E RP North: 116549.0213 End North: 116481.2532 Line Course: S 38-01-48 E North: 116401.8542 Curve Length:166.63 Delta: 72-19-37 Chord: 155.78 Course In: S 51-58-12 W RP North: 116320.5324 End North: 116246.1528 Line Course: S 34-17-49 W North: 116148.0583 Curve Length:405.56 Delta: 58-05-30 Chord: 388.41 Course In: S 55-42-11 E RP North: 115922.6655 End North: 115761.2811 Line Course: S 23-47-41 E North: 115508.9891 Line Course: S 52-28-43 W North: 115468.8826 Line Course: S 81-12-09 W North: 115464.8832 Line Course: S 66-23-40 W North: 115447.4161 Line Course: S 85-44-59 W North: 115444.5508 Course Out: S 42-58-40 E East: 1278632.2812 East: 1279129.9329 Length: 31.24 East: 1279152.0282 Radius: 254.00 Tangent: 94.08 Course: S 24-41-24 E Course Out: N 85-38-02 E East: 1278972.4658 East: 1279225.7286 Radius: 110.00 Tangent: 33.28 Course: S 21-11-53 E Course Out: S 51-58-12 W East: 1279335.4094 East: 1279248.7637 Length: 100.80 East: 1279310.8640 Radius: 132.00 Tangent: 96.48 Course: S 01-52-00 E Course Out: S 55-42-11 E East: 1279206.8891 East : 1279315.9380 Length: 118.74 East: 1279249.0302 Radius: 400.00 Tangent: 222.14 Course: S 05-15-04 W Course Out: S 66-12-19 W East: 1279579.4815 East: 1279213.4828 Length: 275.73 East: 1279324.7291 Length: 65.85 East: 1279272.5018 Length: 26.15 East: 1279246.6594 Length: 43.62 East: 1279206.6894 Length: 38.66 East : 1279168.1357 Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Course: S 62-36-27 W North: 115428.2225 Course: S 19-02-19 W North: 115393.6907 Course: S 43-55-05 W North: 115376.4532 Course: N 75-56-24 W North: 115383.7632 Course: N 80-25-04 W North: 115391.7351 Course: N 80-52-48 W North: 115396.7485 Course: N 46-53-58 W North: 115406.8064 Course: N 04-09-45 E North: 115421.9563 Course: N 05-44-40 E North: 115444.3533 Course: N 51-05-22 W North: 115461.4817 Course: S 76-49-26 W North: 115456.3028 Course: S 61-26-50 W North: 115443.6893 Course: S 53-08-16 W North: 115425.2726 Course: S 36-09-35 W North: 115343.6469 Course: S 23-14-27 W North: 115297.0977 Course: S 59-04-59 W North: 115242.0652 Course: S 46-06-25 W North: 115200.2999 Course: S 37-31-00 W North: 115170.0799 Course: S 37-18-03 W North: 115115.0656 Course: S 33-04-27 W North: 115079.8375 Course: S 28-23-10 W North: 115009.8523 Course: S 06-03-24 W Length: 35.49 East: 1279136.6250 Length: 36.53 East: 1279124.7087 Length: 23.93 East: 1279108.1102 Length: 30.09 East: 1279078.9216 Length: 47.89 East: 1279031.6998 Length: 31.63 East :1279000.4696 Length: 14.72 East: 1278989.7217 Length: 15.19 East: 1278990.8243 Length: 22.51 East: 1278993.0774 Length: 27.27 East: 1278971.8578 Length: 22.72 East: 1278949.7360 Length: 26.39 East: 1278926.5556 Length: 30.70 East: 1278901.9931 Length: 101.10 East :1278842.3403 Length: 50.66 East: 1278822.3500 Length: 107.11 East: 1278730.4589 Length: 60.24 East: 1278687.0479 Length: 38.10 East: 1278663.8452 Length: 69.16 East: 1278621.9343 Length: 42.04 East: 1278598.9920 Length: 79.55 East: 1278561.1731 Length: 57.36 North: 114952.8125 Line Course: S 13-25-47 W North: 114923.0492 Line Course: N 88-17-25 W North: 114923.2855 Line Course: N 84-19-40 W North: 114934.6726 Line Course: N 00-54-31 E North: 115079.6543 Line Course: S 89-05-29 E North: 115079.1786 Line Course: N 00-54-31 E North: 115094.1767 Line Course: N 00-54-31 E North: 115417.4061 Curve Length:42.44 Delta: 1-58-37 Chord: 42.44 Course In: N 78-23-54 W RP North: 115664.7670 End North: 115459.1181 Line Course: N 09-37-29 E North: 115936.5420 Line Course: S 75-03-59 W North: 115936.5394 East: 1278555.1209 Lengthy 30.60 East: 1278548.0140 Length: 7.92 East: 1278540.0975 Length: 115.21 East: 1278425.4516 Length: 145.00 East: 1278427.7510 Length: 30.00 East: 1278457.7472 Length: 15.00 East: 1278457.9851 Length: 323.27 East: 1278463.1114 Radius: 1230.00 Tangent: 21.22 Course: N 10-36-48 E Course Out: S 80-22-31 E East: 1277258.2410 East: 1278470.9275 Length: 484.24 East: 1278551.8896 Length: 0.01 East: 1278551.8800 Area: 879,894 sq.ft 20.200 acres PRIOR TO BLA - PARCEL J North: 115094.1747 East: 1278457.9816 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 15.00 North: 115079.1766 East: 1278457.7437 Line Course: N 89-05-29 W Length: 30.00 North: 115079.6523 East: 1278427.7475 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 145.00 North: 114934.6706 East: 1278425.4481 Line Course: S 84-19-40 E Length: 115.21 North: 114923.2835 East: 1278540.0940 Line Course: N 88-17-25 W Length: 32.46 North: 114924.2520 East: 1278507.6485 Line Course: S 87-30-29 W Length: 25.71 North: 114923.1342 East: 1278481.9628 Line Course: S 16-24-41 W Length: 68.24 North: 114857.6744 East: 1278462.6828 Line Course: S 75-24-13 W Length: 25.15 North: 114851.3364 East: 1278438.3445 Line Course: N 71-13-54 W Length: 20.24 North: 114857.8485 East : 1278419.1807 Line Course: S 10-33-33 W Length: 6.72 North: 114851.2423 East: 1278417.9493 Line Course: N 84-38-11 W Length: 84.08 North: 114859.1017 East: 1278334.2374 Line Course: N 00-54-31 E Length: 140.00 North: 114999.0841 East: 1278336.4575 Line Course: S 89-05-29 E Length: 75.00 North: 114997.8948 East: 1278411.4481 Line Course: N 00-54-31 E Length: 97.00 North: 115094.8826 East: 1278412.9862 Line Course: S 89-05-29 E Length: 45.00 North: 115094.1690 East: 1278457.9806 Line Course: N 09-52-56 E Length: 0.01 North: 115094.1789 East: 1278457.9823 Area: 18,669 sq.ft. 0.429 acres PRIOR TO BLA - PARCEL L North: 114387.5566 East: 1278013.6083 Line Course: S 88-19-11 E Length: 291.27 North: 114379.0159 East: 1278304.7530 Line Course: S 17-22-15 E Length: 13.33 North: 114366.2938 East: 1278308.7328 Line Course: S 41-25-23 E Length: 51.84 North: 114327.4219 East: 1278343.0308 Line Course: S 33-23-28 E Length: 47.90 North: 114287.4286 East: 1278369.3926 Line Course: S 23-16-34 E Length: 14.23 North: 114274.3567 East: 1278375.0158 Line Course: N 88-15-22 W Length: 359.99 North: 114285.3119 East: 1278015.1925 Line Course: N 00-53-19 W Length: 102.27 North: 114387.5696 East: 1278013.6065 Line Course: S 07-49-44 E Length: 0.01 North: 114387.5597 East: 1278013.6078 Area: 33,431 sq.ft 0.767 acres PRIOR TO BLA - PARCEL BLA2-3 EAST North: 114395.7453 East: 1277734.7055 Curve Length:227.76 Rad i us: 1166.00 Delta: 11-11-30 Tangent: 114.24 Chord: 227.40 Course: N 41-45-11 E Course In: S 53-50-34 E Course Out: N 42-39-04 W RP North: 113707.8018 East: 1278676.1352 End North: 114565.3866 East: 1277886.1325 Line Course: N 47-20-56 E Length: 141.29 North: 114661.1152 East: 1277990.0503 Line Course: N 42-39-04 W Length: 4.00 North: 114664.0572 East: 1277987.3401 Line Course: N 47-20-56 E Length: 141.77 North: 114760.1109 East: 1278091.6110 Curve Length:767.41 Radius:1230.00 Delta:35-44-50 Tangent:396.65 Chord: 755.02 Course: N 29-28-31 E Course In: N 42-39-04 W Course Out: S 78-23-54 E RP North: 115664.7673 East: 1277258.2462 End North: 115417.4064 East: 1278463.1166 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 323.27 North: 115094.1770 East: 1278457.9903 Line Course: N 89-05-29 W Length: 45.00 North: 115094.8906 East: 1278412.9959 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 97.00 North: 114997.9028 East: 1278411.4577 Line Course: N 89-05-29 W Length: 75.00 North: 114999.0922 East: 1278336.4672 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 140.00 North: 114859.1098 East: 1278334.2471 Line Course: S 84-38-11 E Length: 84.08 North: 114851.2503 East: 1278417.9590 Line Course: S 10-33-33 W Length: 34.75 North: 114817.0887 East: 1278411.5910 Line Course: S 14-50-51 W Length: 31.55 North: 114786.5922 East: 1278403.5064 Line Course: S 23-47-48 W Length: 68.08 North: 114724.3001 East: 1278376.0367 Line Course: S 26-00-29 W Length: 88.68 North: 114644.6005 East: 1278337.1507 Line Course: S 28-36-54 W Length: 68.59 North: 114584.3883 East: 1278304.3015 Line Course: S 22-20-40 W Length: 41.36 North: 114546.1338 East: 1278288.5775 Line Course: S 10-06-33 W Length: 79.32 North: 114468.0452 East: 1278274.6549 Line Course: S 19-56-27 E Length: 48.12 North: 114422.8102 East: 1278291.0662 Line Course: S 17-22-15 E Length: 45.88 North: 114379.0227 East: 1278304.7639 Line Course: N 88-19-11 W Length: 291.27 North: 114387.5634 East : 1278013.6191 Line Course: N 88-19-11 W Length: 279.02 North: 114395.7448 East: 1277734.7191 Line Course: N 86-40-21 W Length: 0.01 North: 114395.7454 East: 1277734.7091 Area: 218,275 sq.ft. 5.011 acres PRIOR TO BLA - PARCEL BLA2-3 WEST North: 115749.1948 Line Course: S 88-23-02 E North: 115731.1253 Line Course: S 24-11-27 W North: 115455.7091 Curve Length: 109.54 Delta: 12-11-11 Chord: 109.33 Course In: N 65-48-33 W RP North: 115666.7443 End North: 115361.2984 Curve Length:267.17 Delta: 31-14-24 Chord: 263.87 Course In: S 53-37-22 E RP North: 115070.6799 End North: 115114.5552 Curve Length:450.72 Delta: 39-25-36 Chord: 441.88 Course In: S 84-51-46 E RP North: 115055.9056 End North: 114686.8957 Curve Length:509.43 Delta: 83-23-43 Chord: 465.64 Course In: N 55-42-38 E RP North: 114884.0766 End North: 114574.1454 Curve Length:75.14 Delta: 71-45-10 Chord: 70.32 Course In: S 27-41-05 E RP North: 114521.0144 End North: 114564.1252 Curve Length:39.60 Delta: 4-43-38 Chord: 39.59 Course In: N 44-04-05 E RP North: 114909.0120 End North: 114537.7855 East: 1276633.3536 Length: 640.70 East: 1277273.7987 Length: 301.93 East: 1277150.0747 Radius: 515.00 Tangent: 54.98 Course: S 30-17-03 W Course Out: S 53-37-22 E East: 1276680.2991 East: 1277094.9409 Radius: 490.00 Tangent: 136.99 Course: S 20-45-26 W Course Out: N 84-51-46 W East: 1277489.4544 East: 1277001.4227 Radius: 655.00 Tangent: 234.70 Course: S 14-34-34 E Course Out: S 55-42-38 W East: 1277653.7916 East: 1277112.6292 Radius: 350.00 Tangent: 311.81 Course: S 75-59-14 E Course Out: S 27-41-05 E East: 1277401.8000 East: 1277564.4121 Radius: 60.00 Tangent: 43.40 Course: S 81-48-30 E Course Out: N 44-04-05 E East: 1277592.2884 East: 1277634.0192 Radius: 480.00 Tangent: 19.81 Course: S 48-17-44 E Course Out: S 39-20-27 W East: 1277967.8651 East: 1277663.5776 Line Course: S 50-39-33 E North: 114514.1715 Line Course: S 50-39-33 E North: 114504.6625 Curve Length:42.23 Delta: 1-55-30 Chord: 42.23 Course In: S 50-39-33 E RP North: 113707.8098 End North: 114471.5571 Line Course: S 52-35-03 E North: 114460.0128 Curve Length:75.99 Delta: 3-31-01 Chord: 75.98 Course In: S 52-35-03 E RP North: 113707.8098 End North: 114398.2783 Line Course: N 88-19-11 W North: 114437.8163 Line Course: N 13-58-34 E North: 115391.7258 Curve Length:369.95 Delta: 1-52-12 Chord: 369.93 Course In: S 76-01-26 E RP North:112654.1270 End North: 115749.2002 Line Course: S 03-24-54 E North: 115749.1902 Length: 37.25 East: 1277692.3863 Length: 15.00 East: 1277703.9872 Radius: 1257.00 Tangent: 21.12 Course: S 38-22-42 W Course Out: N 52-35-03 W East: 1278676.1366 East: 1277677.7685 Length: 19.00 East :1277692.8592 Radius: 1238.00 Tangent: 38.01 Course: S 35-39-27 W Course Out: N 56-06-04 W East: 1278676.1366 East: 1277648.5681 Length: 1348.40 East: 1276300.7478 Length: 983.01 East: 1276538.1618 Radius: 11335.00 Tangent: 184.99 Course: N 14-54-40 E Course Out: N 74-09-14 W East: 1287537.6062 East: 1276633.3526 Length: 0.01 East: 1276633.3532 Area: 922,546 sq.ft 21.179 acres PRIOR TO BLA - PARCEL BLA3-1 North: 114437.8171 East: 1276300.7485 Line Course: S 88-19-11 E Length: 1348.40 North: 114398.2791 East: 1277648.5687 Curve Length:223.23 Radius:1238.00 Delta:10-19-53 Tangent:111.92 Chord: 222.93 Course: S 28-44-00 W Course In: S 56-06-04 E Course Out: N 66-25-57 W RP North: 113707.8106 East: 1278676.1373 End North: 114202.7991 East: 1277541.3992 Line Course: N 66-25-56 W Length: 12.00 North: 114207.5971 East: 1277530.4002 Curve Length:37.49 Radius:1250.00 Delta: 1-43-06 Tangent: 18.75 Chord: 37.49 Course: S 22-42-31 W Course In: S 66-25-56 E Course Out: N 68-09-02 W RP North: 113707.8051 East: 1278676.1349 End North: 114173.0163 East: 1277515.9286 Curve Length:303.47 Radius:400.00 Delta:43-28-06 Tangent:159.46 Chord: 296.24 Course: S 43-35-01 W Course In: N 68-09-02 W Course Out: S 24-40-56 E RP North: 114321.8838 East: 1277144.6626 End North: 113958.4287 East: 1277311.6967 Line Course: N 24-40-56 W Length: 13.00 North: 113970.2410 East: 1277306.2681 Curve Length:92.97 Radius:387.00 Delta:13-45-51 Tangent:46.71 Chord: 92.75 Course: S 72-12-00 W Course In: N 24-40-56 W Course Out: S 10-55-05 E RP North: 114321.8838 East: 1277144.6626 End North: 113941.8889 East: 1277217.9623 Line Course: S 10-55-05 E Length: 7.00 North: 113935.0156 East: 1277219.2881 Curve Length:142.06 Radius:394.00 Delta:20-39-29 Tangent:71.81 Chord: 141.29 Course: S 89-24-40 W Course In: N 10-55-05 W Course Out: S 09-44-24 W RP North: 114321.8838 East: 1277144.6626 End North: 113933.5631 East: 1277078.0067 Line Course: S 09-44-24 W Length: 26.00 North: 113907.9379 East: 1277073.6081 Curve Length:797.85 Delta: 72-59-47 Chord: 744.97 Course In: S 09-44-24 W RP North:113290.7248 End North: 113572.5320 Line Course: S 26-44-37 W North: 113524.8621 Line Course: N 63-15-23 W North: 113527.1121 Line Course: S 26-44-37 W North: 113334.5661 Curve Length:255.00 Delta: 46-22-54 Chord: 248.09 Course In: N 63-19-05 W RP North:113476.0129 End North: 113174.6749 Line Course: N 00-59-24 E North: 113635.9960 Line Course: N 13-58-34 E North: 114437.8249 Line Course: S 32-15-58 E North: 114437.8165 Radius: 626.24 Tangent: 463.36 Course: S 63-14-30 W Course Out: N 63-15-23 W East: 1276967.6624 East: 1276408.4118 Length: 53.38 East: 1276384.3909 Length: 5.00 East: 1276379.9257 Length: 215.61 East: 1276282.9015 Radius: 315.00 Tangent: 134.95 Course: S 49-52-22 W Course Out: S 16-56-11 E East: 1276001.4449 East: 1276093.2075 Length: 461.39 East: 1276101.1793 Length: 826.29 East: 1276300.7427 Length: 0.01 East: 1276300.7480 Area: 859,050 sq.ft. 19.721 acres AFTER ISLA - LOT 1 North: 117004.6447 East: 1279326.8081 Line Course: S 89-05-51 E Length: 319.96 North: 116999.6051 East: 1279646.7284 Line Course: S 00-53-36 W Length: 857.07 North: 116142.6392 East: 1279633.3659 Line Course: N 89-08-10 W Length: 247.00 North: 116146.3633 East: 1279386.3939 Curve Length:92.11 Radius:67.00 Delta:78-46-15 Tangent:55.01 Chord: 85.03 Course: N 17-35-21 E Course In: N 33-01-32 W Course Out: N 68-12-13 E RP North: 116202.5379 East: 1279349.8781 End North: 116227.4157 East: 1279412.0882 Line Course: N 21-47-47 W Length: 38.69 North: 116263.3397 East: 1279397.7222 Curve Length:46.28 Radius:104.00 Delta:25-29-54 Tangent:23.53 Chord: 45.90 Course: N 09-02-50 W Course In: N 68-12-13 E Course Out: N 86-17-53 W RP North: 116301.9558 East: 1279494.2872 End North: 116308.6707 East: 1279390.5042 Curve Length: 134.02 Radius:184.00 Delta: 41-43-55 Tangent: 70.14 Chord: 131.08 Course: N 17-09-50 W Course In: N 86-17-53 W Course Out: N 51-58-12 E RP North: 116320.5509 East: 1279206.8881 End North: 116433.9085 East: 1279351.8228 Line Course: N 38-01-48 W Length: 100.80 North: 116513.3075 East: 1279289.7225 Curve Length:34.08 Radius:58.00 Delta:33-39-50 Tangent:17.55 Chord: 33.59 Course: N 21-11-53 W Course In: N 51-58-12 E Course Out: S 85-38-02 W RP North: 116549.0398 East: 1279335.4084 End North: 116544.6243 East: 1279277.5767 Curve Length:217.09 Radius:306.00 Delta:40-38-51 Tangent:113.34 Chord: 212.56 Course: N 24-41-23 W Course In: S 85-38-02 W Course Out: N 44-59-11 E RP North: 116521.3287 East: 1278972.4648 End North: 116737.7548 East: 1279188.7880 Line Course: N 45-00-49 W North: 116759.8396 Curve Length:61.45 Delta: 4-49-22 Chord: 61.43 Course In: N 47-03-37 W RP Noah:117257.1364 End North: 116806.5304 Line Course: S 89-05-51 E North: 116806.3532 Curve Length:227.15 Delta: 17-36-41 Chord: 226.26 Course In: N 52-24-35 W RP North: 117257.1511 End North: 117004.6541 Line Course: S 06-06-58 E North: 117004.6441 Length: 31.24 East: 1279166.6928 Radius: 730.00 Tangent: 30.74 Course: N 40-31-42 E Course Out: S 51-52-59 E East: 1278632.2811 East: 1279206.6104 Length: 11.25 East: 1279217,8590 Radius: 739.00 Tangent: 114.48 Course: N 28-47-04 E Course Out: S 70-01-16 E East: 1278632.2805 East: 1279326.8064 Length: 0.01 East: 1279326.8075 Area: 285,938 sq.ft. 6.564 acres AFTER BLA - LOT 2 North: 116723.0418 Curve Length:40.79 Delta: 3-12-04 Chord: 40.78 Course In: N 42-58-40 W RP North:117257.1231 End North: 116696.0859 Line Course: S 50-13-24 W North: 116519.8475 Curve Length:687.32 Delta: 40-35-55 Chord: 673.03 Course In: S 39-46-36 E RP North:115774.3596 End North: 115936.5380 Line Course: S 09-37-29 W North: 115629.4917 Line Course: S 63-04-46 E North: 115425.2767 East: 1279129.9411 Radius: 730.00 Tangent: 20.40 Course: S 48-37-22 W Course Out: S 39-46-36 E East: 1278632.2894 East: 1279099.3410 Length: 275.46 East: 1278887.6379 Radius: 970.00 Tangent: 358.80 Course: S 29-55-27 W Course Out: N 80-22-31 W East: 1279508.2407 East: 1278551.8945 Length: 311.43 East: 1278499.8252 Length: 451.05 East: 1278901.9972 Line Course: N 53-08-16 E Length: 30.70 North: 115443.6934 East: 1278926.5597 Line Course: N 61-26-50 E Length: 26.39 North: 115456.3070 East: 1278949.7401 Line Course: N 76-49-26 E Length: 22.72 North: 115461.4859 East: 1278971.8619 Line Course: S 51-05-22 E Length: 27.27 North: 115444.3574 East: 1278993.0815 Line Course: S 05-44-40 W Length: 22.51 North: 115421.9605 East: 1278990.8284 Line Course: S O4-09-45 W Length: 15.19 North: 115406.8105 East: 1278989.7258 Line Course: S 46-53-58 E Length: 14.72 North: 115396.7527 East: 1279000.4737 Line Course: S 80-52-48 E Length: 31.63 North: 115391.7392 East: 1279031.7039 Line Course: S 80-25-04 E Length: 47.89 North: 115383.7673 East: 1279078.9257 Line Course: S 75-56-24 E Length: 30.09 North: 115376.4573 East : 1279108.1143 Line Course: N 43-55-05 E Length: 23.93 North: 115393.6949 East: 1279124.7128 Line Course: N 19-02-19 E Length: 36.53 North: 115428.2266 East: 1279136.6291 Line Course: N 62-36-27 E Length: 35.49 North: 115444.5550 East: 1279168.1398 Line Course: N 85-44-59 E Length: 38.66 North: 115447.4202 East: 1279206.6935 Line Course: N 66-23-40 E Length: 43.62 North: 115464.8873 East: 1279246.6635 Line Course: N 81-12-09 E Length: 26.15 North: 115468.8868 East: 1279272.5059 Line Course: N 52-28-43 E Length: 65.85 North: 115508.9932 East: 1279324.7332 Line Course: N 23-47-41 W Length: 275.73 North: 115761.2853 East: 1279213.4869 Curve Length:405.56 Radius:400.00 Delta:58-05-30 Tangent:222.14 Chord: 388.41 Course: N 05-15-04 E Course In: N 66-12-19 E Course Out: N 55-42-11 W RP North: 115922.6697 East: 1279579.4856 End North: 116148.0625 East: 1279249.0343 Line Course: N 34-17-49 E Length: 118.74 North: 116246.1570 Curve Length: 166.63 Delta: 72-19-37 Chord: 155.78 Course In: N 55-42-11 W RP North:116320.5366 End North: 116401.8584 Line Course: N 38-01-48 W North: 116481.2573 Curve Length:64.63 Delta: 33-39-50 Chord: 63.70 Course In: N 51-58-12 E RP North: 116549.0255 End North: 116540.6513 Curve Length:180.20 Delta: 40-38-51 Chord: 176.44 Course In: S 85-38-02 W RP North:116521.3144 End North: 116700.9622 Line Course: N 45-00-49 W North: 116723.0470 Line Course: S 44-05-39 E North: 116723.0398 East: 1279315.9422 Radius: 132.00 Tangent: 96.48 Course: N 01-52-00 W Course Out: N 51-58-12 E East: 1279206.8932 East: 1279310.8681 Length: 100.80 East: 1279248.7678 Radius: 110.00 Tangent: 33.28 Course: N 21-11-53 W Course Out: S 85-38-02 W East: 1279335.4135 East: 1279225.7328 Radius: 254.00 Tangent: 94.08 Course: N 24-41-24 W Course Out: N 44-59-11 E East: 1278972.4699 East: 1279152.0323 Length: 31.24 East: 1279129.9371 Length: 0.01 East: 1279129.9440 Area: 713,522 sq.ft. 16.380 acres AFTER BLA - LOT 3 North: 114395.7453 Curve Length:227.76 Delta: 11-11-30 Chord: 227.40 Course In: S 53-50-34 E RP North: 113707.8018 End North: 114565.3866 Line Course: N 47-20-56 E North: 114661.1152 Line Course: N 42-39-04 W North: 114664.0572 Line Course: N 47-20-56 E East: 1277734.7055 Radius: 1166.00 Tangent: 114.24 Course: N 41-45-11 E Course Out: N 42-39-04 W East: 1278676.1352 East: 1277886.1325 Length: 141.29 East: 1277990.0503 Length: 4.00 East: 1277987.3401 Length: 141.77 North: 114760.1109 East: 1278091.6110 Curve Length:809.85 Radius:1230.00 Delta:37-43-27 Tangent:420.21 Chord: 795.30 Course: N 28-29-13 E Course In: N 42-39-04 W Course Out: S 80-22-31 E RP North: 115664.7673 East: 1277258.2462 End North: 115459.1185 East: 1278470.9327 Line Course: N 09-37-29 E Length: 172.81 North: 115629.4960 East: 1278499.8255 Line Course: S 63-04-46 E Length: 451.05 North: 115425.2810 East: 1278901.9976 Line Course: S 36-09-35 W Length: 101.10 North: 115343.6554 East: 1278842.3447 Line Course: S 23-14-27 W Length: 50.66 North: 115297.1062 East: 1278822.3544 Line Course: S 59-04-59 W Length: 107.11 North: 115242.0736 East: 1278730.4634 Line Course: S 46-06-25 W Length: 60.24 North: 115200.3084 East: 1278687.0523 Line Course: S 37-31-00 W Length: 38.10 North: 115170.0883 East: 1278663.8497 Line Course: S 37-18-03 W Length: 69.16 North: 115115.0740 East: 1278621.9387 Line Course: S 33-04-27 W Length: 42.04 North: 115079.8460 East: 1278598.9965 Line Course: S 28-23-10 W Length: 79.55 North: 115009,8607 East: 1278561.1775 Line Course: S 06-03-24 W Length: 57.36 North: 114952.8209 East: 1278555.1254 Line Course: S 13-25-47 W Length: 30.60 North: 114923.0577 East: 1278548.0184 Line Course: N 88-17-25 W Length: 40.38 North: 114924.2624 East: 1278507.6564 Line Course: S 87-30-29 W Length: 25.71 North: 114923.1446 East: 1278481.9707 Line Course: S 16-24-41 W Length: 68.24 North: 114857.6848 East: 1278462.6907 Line Course: S 75-24-13 W Length: 25.15 North: 114851.3468 East: 1278438.3525 Line Course: N 71-13-54 W Length: 20.24 North: 114857.8589 East: 1278419.1887 Line Course: S 10-33-33 W Length: 41.47 North: 114817.0911 East: 1278411.5893 Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Line Course: S 14-50-51 W North: 114786.5946 Course: S 23-47-48 W North: 114724.3025 Course: S 26-00-29 W North: 114644.6029 Course: S 28-36-54 W North: 114584.3907 Course: S 22-20-40 W North: 114546.1362 Course: S 10-06-33 W North: 114468.0476 Course: S 19-56-27 E North: 114422.8126 Course: S 17-22-15 E North: 114366.3031 Course: S 41-25-23 E North: 114327.4311 Course: S 33-23-28 E North: 114287.4378 Course: S 23-16-34 E North: 114274.3660 Course: N 88-15-22 W North: 114285.3211 Course: N 00-53-19 W North: 114387.5788 Course: N 88-19-11 W North: 114395.7603 Course: S 24-32-53 W North: 114395.7512 Length: 31.55 East: 1278403.5047 Length: 68.08 East: 1278376.0349 Length: 88.68 East: 1278337.1490 Length: 68.59 East :1278304.2997 Length: 41.36 East: 1278288.5757 Length: 79.32 East: 1278274.6532 Length: 48.12 East: 1278291.0645 Length: 59.21 East: 1278308.7419 Length: 51.84 East: 1278343.0400 Length: 47.90 East: 1278369.4018 Length: 14.23 East: 1278375.0249 Length: 359.99 East: 1278015.2017 Length: 102.27 East: 1278013.6156 Length: 279.02 East: 1277734.7156 Length: 0.01 East: 1277734.7114 Area: 436,731 sq.ft.10.026 acres AFTER BLA - LOT 4 North: 115748.1002 Line Course: S 88-23-02 E North: 115731.1253 Line Course: S 24-11-27 W North: 115455.7090 Curve Length:109.54 - Delta: 12-11-11 East: 1276672.1463 Length: 601.89 East: 1277273.7969 Length: 301.93 East: 1277150.0729 Radius: 515.00 Tangent: 54.98 Chord: 109.33 Course In: N 65-48-33 W RP North: 115666.7442 End North: 115361.2983 Curve Length:267.17 Delta: 31-14-24 Chord: 263.87 Course In: S 53-37-22 E RP North:115070.6799 End North: 115114.5552 Curve Length:450.72 Delta: 39-25-36 Chord: 441.88 Course In: S 84-51-46 E RP North:115055.9056 End North: 114686,8957 Curve Length:509.43 Delta: 83-23-43 Chord: 465.64 Course In: N 55-42-38 E RP North:114884.0766 End North: 114574.1454 Curve Length:75.14 Delta: 71-45-10 Chord: 70.32 Course In: S 27-41-05 E RP North:114521.0144 End North: 114564.1252 Curve Length:39.60 Delta: 4-43-38 Chord: 39.59 Course In: N 44-04-05 E RP North: 114909.0120 End North: 114537.7855 Line Course: S 50-39-33 E North: 114514.1715 Line Course: S 50-39-33 E North: 114504.6625 Curve Length:42.23 Delta: 1-55-30 Chord: 42.23 Course In: S 50-39-33 E RP North: 113707.8097 Course: S 30-17-03 W Course Out: S 53-37-22 E East: 1276680.2972 East: 1277094.9390 Radius: 490.00 Tangent: 136.99 Course: S 20-45-26 W Course Out: N 84-51-46 W East: 1277489.4525 East: 1277001.4208 Radius: 655.00 Tangent: 234.70 Course: S 14-34-34 E Course Out: S 55-42-38 W East: 1277653.7897 East: 1277112.6274 Radius: 350.00 Tangent: 311.81 Course: S 75-59-14 E Course Out: S 27-41-05 E East: 1277401.7981 East: 1277564.4102 Radius: 60.00 Tangent: 43.40 Course: S 81-48-30 E Course Out: N 44-04-05 E East: 1277592.2865 East: 1277634.0173 Radius: 480.00 Tangent: 19.81 Course: S 48-17-44 E Course Out: S 39-20-27 W East: 1277967.8632 East: 1277663.5757 Length: 37.25 East: 1277692.3844 Length: 15.00 East: 1277703.9853 Radius: 1257.00 Tangent: 21.12 Course: S 38-22-42 W Course Out: N 52-35-03 W East: 1278676.1348 End North: 114471.5571 Line Course: S 52-35-03 E North: 114460.0128 Curve Length:299.22 Delta: 13-50-53 Chord: 298.49 Course In: S 52-35-03 E RP North: 113707.8097 End North: 114202.8038 Line Course: N 66-25-56 W North: 114207.6018 Curve Length:37.49 Delta: 1-43-06 Chord: 37.49 Course In: S 66-25-56 E RP North: 113707.8097 End North: 114173.0209 Curve Length:303.47 Delta: 43-28-06 Chord: 296.24 Course In: N 68-09-02 W RP Noah:114321.8885 End North: 113958.4334 Line Course: N 24-40-56 W North: 113970.2457 Curve Length:92.97 Delta: 13-45-51 Chord: 92.75 Course In: N 24-40-56 W RP Noah:114321.8885 End North: 113941.8936 Line Course: S 10-55-05 E North: 113935.0203 Curve Length:142.06 Delta: 20-39-29 Chord: 141.29 Course In: N 10-55-05 W RP North:114321.8885 End North: 113933.5678 Line Course: N 53-35-23 W North: 113989.9563 Line Course: N 17-42-47 W North: 114450.4965 East: 1277677.7666 Length: 19.00 East: 1277692.8573 Radius: 1238.00 Tangent: 150.34 Course: S 30-29-30 W Course Out: N 66-25-56 W East: 1278676.1348 East: 1277541.3991 Length: 12.00 East: 1277530.4001 Radius: 1250.00 Tangent: 18.75 Course: S 22-42-31 W Course Out: N 68-09-02 W East: 1278676.1348 East: 1277515.9285 Radius: 400.00 Tangent: 159.46 Course: S 43-35-01 W Course Out: S 24-40-56 E East: 1277144.6625 East: 1277311.6966 Length: 13.00 East: 1277306.2680 Radius: 387.00 Tangent: 46.71 Course: S 72-12-00 W Course Out: S 10-55-05 E East: 1277144.6625 East: 1277217.9622 Length: 7.00 East: 1277219.2880 Radius: 394.00 Tangent: 71.81 Course: S 89-24-40 W Course Out: S 09-44-24 W East: 1277144.6625 East: 1277078.0066 Length: 95.00 East: 1277001.5518 Length: 483.46 East: 1276854.4590 Line Course: N 64-40-34 W North: 114465.4672 Line Course: N 12-37-15 W North: 114761.5363 Line Course: N 00-16-17 E North: 115008.1935 Line Course: N 26-06-22 W North: 115133.9108 Line Course: N 01-12-07 W North: 115303.8734 Line Course: N 11-20-41 W North: 115450.9426 Line Course: N 03-39-17 W North: 115650.5359 Line Course: N 12-38-06 E North: 115748.1142 Line Course: S 03-18-40 E North: 115748.1042 Length: 35.00 East: 1276822.8224 Length: 303.40 East :1276756.5300 Length: 246.66 East: 1276757.6984 Length: 140.00- East : 1276696.0935 Length: 170.00 East: 1276692.5275 Length: 150.00 East: 1276663.0208 Length: 200.00 East :1276650.2720 Length: 100.00 East: 1276672.1460 Length: 0.01 East: 1276672.1466 Area: 842,262 sq.ft. 19.336 acres AFTER BLA - LOT 5 North: 115391.7266 Curve Length:369.95 Delta: 1-52-12 Chord: 369.93 Course In: S 76-01-26 E RP North: 112654.1278 End North: 115749.2010 Line Course: S 88-23-02 E North: 115748.1065 Line Course: S 12-38-06 W North: 115650.5281 Line Course: S 03-39-17 E North: 115450.9349 Line Course: S 11-20-41 E North: 115303.8657 Line Course: S 01-12-07 E North: 115133.9031 Line Course: S 26-06-22 E North: 115008.1858 East: 1276538.1624 Radius: 11335.00 Tangent: 184.99 Course: N 14-54-40 E Course Out: N 74-09-14 W East: 1287537.6068 East: 1276633.3532 Length: 38.81 East: 1276672.1478 Length: 100.00 East: 1276650.2739 Length: 200.00 East: 1276663.0226 Length: 150.00 East : 1276692.5293 Length: 170.00 East: 1276696.0953 Length: 140.00 East: 1276757.7002 Line Course: S 00-16-17 W North: 114761.5285 Line Course: S 12-37-15 E North: 114465.4595 Line Course: S 64-40-34 E North: 114450.4888 Line Course: S 17-42-47 E North: 113989.9485 Line Course: S 53-35-23 E North: 113933.5600 Line Course: S 09-44-24 W North: 113907.9348 Curve Length:797.85 Delta: 72-59-47 Chord: 744.97 Course In: S 09-44-24 W RP North:113290.7217 End North: 113572.5290 Line Course: S 26-44-37 W North: 113524.8591 Line Course: N 63-15-23 W North: 113527.1091 Line Course: S 26-44-37 W North: 113334.5631 Curve Length:255.00 Delta: 46-22-54 Chord: 248.09 Course In: N 63-19-05 W RP North:113476.0099 End North: 113174.6718 Line Course: N 00-59-24 E North: 113635.9929 Line Course: N 13-58-34 E North: 115391.7313 Line Course: S 43-08-48 E North: 115391.7240 Length: 246.66 East: 1276756.5319 Length: 303.40 East: 1276822.8242 Length: 35.00 East: 1276854.4608 Length: 483.46 East: 1277001.5536 Length: 95.00 East: 1277078.0084 Length: 26.00 East: 1277073.6098 Radius: 626.24 Tangent: 463.36 Course: S 63-14-30 W Course Out: N 63-15-23 W East: 1276967.6641 East: 1276408.4135 Length: 53.38 East: 1276384.3926 Length: 5.00 East: 1276379.9274 Length: 215.61 East: 1276282.9032 Radius: 315.00 Tangent: 134.95 Course: S 49-52-22 W Course Out: S 16-56-11 E East: 1276001.4466 East: 1276093.2092 Length: 461.39 East : 1276101.1810 Length: 1809.30 East: 1276538.1583 Length: 0.01 East: 1276538.1652 Area: 939,339 sq.ft. 21.564 acres CENTERLINES NORTH North: 118338.5130 Line Course: S 89-44-49 E North: 118334.7771 Line Course: S 00-42-32 W North: 117248.4702 Curve Length:604.93 Delta: 49-30-52 Chord: 586.28 Course In: N 89-17-28 W RP North: 117257.1307 End North: 116719.1498 Line Course: S 50-13-24 W North: 116542.9114 Curve Length:708.58 Delta: 40-35-55 Chord: 693.85 Course In: S 39-46-36 E RP North: 115774.3672 End North: 115941.5614 Line Course: S 09-37-29 W North: 115464.1376 Curve Length:790.09 Delta: 37-43-27 Chord: 775.90 Course In: N 80-22-31 W RP North: 115664.7706 End North: 114782.1790 Line Course: S 47-20-56 W North: 114590.3967 Curve Length:534.06 Delta: 25-29-58 Chord: 529.66 Course In: S 42-39-04 E RP Noah:113707.8051 End North: 114154.4079 Curve Length:611.75 Delta: 77-53-26 Chord: 565.72 Course In: N 68-09-02 W RP North:114321.8839 End North: 113878.3704 East: 1278499.7936 Length: 845.88 East: 1279345.6653 Length: 1086.39 East: 1279332.2244 Radius: 700.00 Tangent: 322.81 Course: S 25-27-58 W Course Out: S 39-46-36 E East: 1278632.2780 East: 1279080.1357 Length: 275.46 East: 1278868.4325 Radius: 1000.00 Tangent: 369.90 Course: S 29-55-26 W Course Out: N 80-22-31 W East: 1279508.2293 East: 1278522.3053 Length: 484.24 East: 1278441.3432 Radius: 1200.00 Tangent: 409.97 Course: S 28-29-12 W Course Out: S 42-39-04 E East: 1277258.2344 East: 1278071.2732 Length: 283.06 East: 1277863.0846 Radius: 1200.00 Tangent: 271.53 Course: S 34-35-57 W Course Out: N 68-09-02 W East: 1278676.1234 East: 1277562.3254 Radius: 450.00 Tangent: 363.69 Course: S 60-47-41 W Course Out: S 09-44-24 W East: 1277144.6511 East: 1277068.5213 Curve Length:759.63 Delta: 72-59-47 Chord: 709.28 Course In: S 09-44-24 W RP North: 113290.7248 End North: 113559.0321 Line Course: S 26-44-37 W North: 113318.8520 Curve Length:397.43 Delta: 65-03-36 Chord: 376.42 Course In: N 63-19-05 W RP North:113476.0151 End North: 113126.1768 Line Course: N 88-11-07 W North: 113132.5749 Line Course: S 88-15-22 E North: 113130.8160 Line Course: N 13-58-34 E North: 115421.9221 Curve Length:536.71 Delta: 2-41-00 Chord: 536.65 Course In: S 76-01-26 E RP North: 112654.1336 End North: 115939.5148 Line Course: N 16-39-34 E North: 118373.5035 Line Course: S 88-20-53 E North: 118338.5261 Line Course: S 28-50-50 E North: 118338.5173 CENTERLINES SOUTH Radius: 596.24 Tangent: 441.17 Course: S 63-14-31 W Course Out: N 63-15-23 W East: 1276967.6509 East: 1276435.1912 Length: 268.95 East: 1276314.1640 Radius: 350.00 Tangent: 223.23 Course: S 59-12-43 W Course Out: S 01-44-31 W East: 1276001.4345 East: 1275990.7952 Length: 202.04 East: 1275788.8565 Length: 57.80 East: 1275846.6297 Length: 2361.00 East: 1276416.8521 Radius: 11460.00 Tangent: 268.40 Course: N 15-19-04 E Course Out: N 73-20-26 W East: 1287537.5961 East: 1276558.6221 Length: 2540.63 East: 1277286.9762 Length: 1213.32 East: 1278499.7919 Length: 0.01 East: 1278499.7968 North: 113132.5650 East: 1275788.8650 Line Course: S 88-11-07 E Length: 202.04 North: 113126.1669 East: 1275990.8037 Curve Length:397.43 Radius:350.00 Delta:65-03-36 Tangent:223.23 Chord: 376.42 Course: N 59-12-43 E Course In: N 01-44-31 E Course Out: S 63-19-05 E RP North:113476.0051 End North: 113318.8420 Line Course: N 26-44-37 E North: 113559.0222 Curve Length:759.63 Delta: 72-59-47 Chord: 709.28 Course In: S 63-15-23 E RP North: 113290.7149 End North: 113878.3604 Curve Length:52.07 Delta: 5-00-13 Chord: 52.05 Course In: S 09-44-24 W RP North: 113290.7149 End North: 113867.3233 Curve Length:623.08 Delta: 70-00-00 Chord: 585.05 Course In: S 14-44-37 W RP North:113374.1154 End North: 113420.8378 Line Course: S 05-15-23 E North: 113079.5889 Line Course: S 05-15-23 E North: 113011.3272 Curve Length:722.79 Delta: 69-01-16 Chord: 679.87 Course In: N 84-44-37 E RP North: 113066.2948 End North: 112488.7436 Line Course: S 74-16-39 E North: 112438.1248 Curve Length:461.28 Delta: 75-30-48 Chord: 428.62 Course In: S 15-43-21 W RP North: 112101.2199 End North: 112093.6712 Line Course: S 01-14-09 W North: 110433.0876 Line Course: N 88-22-17 W East: 1276001.4430 East: 1276314.1725 Length: 268.95 East: 1276435.1997 Radius: 596.24 Tangent: 441.17 Course: N 63-14-31 E Course Out: N 09-44-24 E East: 1276967.6594 East: 1277068.5298 Radius: 596.24 Tangent: 26.05 Course: S 77-45-29 E Course Out: N 14-44-37 E East: 1276967.6594 East: 1277119.3989 Radius: 510.00 Tangent: 357.11 Course: S 40-15-23 E Course Out: N 84-44-37 E East: 1276989.6069 East: 1277497.4623 Length: 342.69 East: 1277528.8570 Length: 68.55 East: 1277535.1370 Radius: 600.00 Tangent: 412.53 Course: S 39-46-01 E Course Out: S 15-43-21 W East: 1278132.6139 East: 1277970.0268 Length: 186.80 East: 1278149.8377 Radius: 350.00 Tangent: 271.06 Course: S 36-31-15 E Course Out: S 88-45-51 E East: 1278054.9953 East: 1278404.9139 Length: 1660.97 East: 1278369.0906 Length: 5258.09 Line Line Line North: 110582.5267 Course: N 01-12-17 E North: 113212.0953 Course: S 88-15-41 E North: 113132.5552 Course: N 55-17-44 E North: 113132.5609 East :1273113.1246 Length: 2630.15 East: 1273168.4230 Length: 2621.64 East: 1275788.8561 Length: 0.01 East: 1275788.8644 Msm8lengrlesm-jobs1188610011016-00221documenticlosures for bla 4.doc SUBDIVISION Guarantee/Certificate Number: Issued By: JAN 10 2018 "OF FEDERAL ViAY 0112694-16 CHICAGOTITLE INSURANCECOMPA MMU NIT YDEVELOPMEW Revision 3rd Guarantee CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth in Schedule A. Please note carefully the liability exclusions and limitations and the specific assurances afforded by this guarantee. If you wish additional liability, or assurances other than as contained herein, please contact the Company for further information as to the availability and cost. Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98104 yes Countersigned By:�Po rJl'r Qom( SEAL Authorized Officer or Agent Chicago Title Insurance Company By: Attest: P�Mpw�, President Secretary Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate PnraO. 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 1 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Liability $1,000.00 GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 REVISION 3rd Guarantee ISSUING OFFICE: Title Officer: Seattle Builder / Unit 16 Chicago Title Company of Washington 701 5th Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: (206)628-5623 Main Phone: (206)628-5623 Email: CTISeaftleBuilderUnit@ctt.com Effective Date: December 29, 2017 at 08:00 AM The assurances referred to on the face page are: SCHEDULE A Premium $350.00 Tax $35.35 That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matter relative to the following described property: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Title to said real property is vested in: Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company subject to the matters shown below under Exceptions, which Exceptions are not necessarily shown in the order of their priority. END OF SCHEDULE A Subdivision Guarantee/CeNficale ?rimed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 2 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description PARCEL BLA3.1 LOT 1 OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 17-100484-SU AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20171103900001, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL BLA2-3 LOT 3 OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 17-100455-SU AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20171108900002, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL F BEGINNING 20 FEET EAST OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 468.34 FEET; THENCE EAST 183.95 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO LAKE; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG LAKE 1220 FEET TO POINT ON THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 1160.31 FEET EAST OF THE WEST QUARTER CORNER; THENCE WEST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30 FEET; THENCE EAST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1030.33 FEET; THENCE WEST 1133.37 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF A COUNTY ROAD (32ND AVENUE SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJACENT; AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF GAME UNDER RECORDING NO. 8204160626; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY, SOUTHERLY LINE OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH (ALSO KNOWN AS WEYERHAUSER WAY SOUTH) AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1978 UNDER RECORDING NO.7809150862; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 200 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W M, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON NORTH LAKE ON THE EAST -WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 15 DISTANT NORTH 89° 12' EAST 1160.31 FEET FROM THE WEST QUARTER CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89° 12' WEST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00` 47' WEST 30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89' 12' EAST 69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 47' WEST TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2 DISTANT NORTH 89' 13, EAST 1163.37 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTH AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTH AND NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF GAME UNDER KING COUNTY RECORDING NO. 8204160626; Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 3 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WEST OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH (ALSO KNOWN AS WEYERHAUSER WAY SOUTH); TOGETHER WITH (A) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 89° 12' EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 45' EAST, PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 468.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00° 45' EAST 33.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 55' EAST 175 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 89° 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 89° 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJACENT; (B) THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 89' 12' EAST, ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 FEET; _ THENCE SOUTH 00° 45' EAST PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 501.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00° 45' EAST 33.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 55' EAST TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 89° 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 89' 55' WEST 175 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SECOND CLASS SHORE LANDS ADJOINING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 89° 12' EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 45' EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION, 535.01 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0° 45' EAST 33.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89' 55' EAST 124.55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 89° 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 89° 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THE SHORELANDS OF THE SECOND CLASS FRONTING THEREON; Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 4 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH THE SHORELANDS OF THE SECOND CLASS LYING IN FRONT THEREOF; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION AND RUNNING THENCE NORTH 89° 12' EAST ALONG THE EAST AND WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION, 20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 45' EAST PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION, 568.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00° 45' EAST 50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 55' EAST 83.25 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SHORE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE LINE TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 69° 55' WEST; THENCE NORTH 89° 55' WEST 124.55 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (M. ED READ ROAD) AS VACATED BY KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8407180415 WHICH ATTACHED TO SAID PREMISES BY OPERATION OF LAW; TOGETHER WITH SHORE LANDS OF THE 2ND CLASS LYING IN FRONT OF, ADJACENT TO OR ABUTTING THEREON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15, RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 0° 53, 59" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT, 618.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0° 53' 59" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2,147.5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84° 20' 12" EAST, 75 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SHORE LINE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE LINE TO A POINT THAT BEARS SOUTH 89' 55' EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89° 55' WEST TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16, RUNNING THENCE SOUTH 0° 53, 59" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, 668.34 FEET TO MEANDER CORNER ON NORTH LAKE, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 0° 53' 59" WEST, 97.5 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84° 20' 12" WEST 30.1 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0° 53' 59" EAST 145 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 06' 01" EAST 30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 53' 59" WEST 50 FEET TO MEANDER CORNER AND TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL J THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 5 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description THENCE SOUTH 00°53'59" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 668.34 FEET TO THE MEANDER CORNER OF NORTH LAKE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00°53'59" WEST 182 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SHORE LINE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTH 84°20'12" WEST 120.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°53'59" EAST 140 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°06'01" EAST 75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°53'59" EAST 97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°06'01" EAST 45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°53'59" WEST 65 FEET TO MEANDER CORNER AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED MAIN TRACT (MEANDER CORNER OF NORTH LAKE); THENCE SOUTH 00°53'59" WEST 97.5 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84°20'12" WEST 30.10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°53'59" EAST 145 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°06'01" EAST 30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°53'59" WEST 50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT SECOND CLASS SHORELANDS; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MEANDER CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2, WHICH POINT IS SOUTH 00°53'59" WEST 668.34 FEET FROM THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 00°53'59" WEST 97.5 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00°53'59" WEST 84.5 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SHORELINE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SHORE LINE TO A POINT THAT BEARS SOUTH 84°20112" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 84°20'12" WEST 75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT SECOND CLASS SHORELANDS. PARCEL L TRACT 53 OF THE STATE PLAT IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 41 OF PLATS AT PAGE 30,31 AND 32, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF 30TH AVENUE SOUTH VACATED UNDER KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 6801 AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20020424003359 WHICH ATTACHES BY OPERATION OF LAW. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 6 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO.0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 3rd Guarantee SCHEDULE B GENERAL EXCEPTIONS H. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Primed- 01.05.18 @ 02U2 PPA Page 7 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 REVISION 3rd Guarantee 1. Notice of additional water or sewer facility tap or connection charge, filed by Federal Way Water and Sewer District under recording number 8905120210. Affects: All Parcels 2. Easement rights and maintenance agreements, if any, for utilities which may have been granted in vacated streets and alleys prior to the vacations. S/ 6 Affects: Parcels BLA3-1, BLA2-3, & L A t I P ae-c e A.5 3. Landscape areas as disclosed on King County Assessor's Map. Affects: Parcel BLA3-1 4. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on State Plat in Section 16, Township 21 N, R. 4E, Volume 41, Page 30. Affects: Parcels BLA3-1 & L 5. Provisions in King County Superior Court Cause No. 385515 filed June 25, 1947 fixing the level of North Lake. Affects: Parcels BLA2-3, F, J, & L 6. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 2648274 Affects: all shorelands adjacent to or abutting upon Government Lots 1 & 2 in Section 15 of Parcel F Subdivision GuaranteelCeriificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 Ptd Page 8 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 REVISION 3rd Guarantee 7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Puget Sound Power and Light Company Purpose: Electric transmission and/or distribution system Recording Date June 27, 1931 Recording No.: 2678839 Affects: Parcel F 8. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Puget Sound Power and Light Company Purpose: Electric transmission and/or distribution system Recording Date: October 19, 1934 Recording No.: 2825254 Affects: Parcel F 9. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4045871 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1-Tract 31 10. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4381073 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1-Tract 32 11. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4381075 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1-Tract 33 Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 9 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 GUARANTEEMERTIFICATE NO.0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 3rd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 12. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4778515 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1-Tract 40 13. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 4980400 Affects: Parcel BLA2-3 14. Relinquishment of access to State Highway Number 1 and of light, view and air by Deed: Grantee: State of Washington Recording Date: December 29, 1958 Recording No.: 4980491 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1-Tract 32 15. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5073868 Afffects: Parcel BLA3-1-Tract 30 16. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5208159 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1-Tract 34 Guarantee/Certificate Printed; 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 10 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANTEEXERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 REVISION 3rd Guarantee 17. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5628306 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1-Tract 39 18. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: June 2, 1964 Recording No.: 5743180 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1 19. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: July 23, 1964 Recording No.: 5765326 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1 20. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: July 23, 1964 Recording No.: 5765327 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1 21. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipe Line Company Purpose: Pipelines Recording Date: September 11, 1964 Recording No.: 5785334 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1 22. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 5907660 Affects: Parcel C:Q-Tract 35 Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:0 PPM Page 11 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANTEEXERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 REVISION 3rd Guarantee 23. Exceptions and reservations contained in deed whereby the grantor excepts and reserves all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same and providing that such rights shall not be exercised until provision has been made for full payment of all damages sustained by reason of such entry 24 25. 26. Grantor: State of Washington Recording No.: 6060098 Affects: Parcel L Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in deed In favor of: Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: King County February 25, 1969 6475093 Parcel BLA3-1 Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Olympic Pipeline Company Purpose: Transmission of petroleum products Recording Date: September 22, 1969 Recording No.: 6567596 Affects: Parcels BLA3-1 & BLA2-3 Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: King County Water District No. 100 Purpose: Water mains Recording Date: April 8, 1971 Recording No.: 7104080368 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1 27. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: Recording No.: Affects: March 22, 1973 7303220472 Parcel BLA3-1 Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 12 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 3rd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 28. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property herein described as granted or reserved in deed In favor of: King County Recording Date: September 15, 1978 Recording No.: 7809150862 Affects: Parcesl BLA3-1 & BLA2-3 29. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document Granted to: King County Water District No. 124 Purpose: Water Facilities Recording Date: July 8, 1980 Recording No.: 8007080485 Affects: Parcels BLA2-3, F, & J 30. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: King County Water District No. 124 Purpose: Water mains Recording Date: April 29, 1981 Recording No.: 8104290757 Affects: Parcel L 31. This item intentionally deleted 32. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Right to use access road, permanent gate, and right to lock said gate Reserved by: Weyerhauser Company Recording Date: April 16, 1982 Recording No.: 8204160626 Said instrument also provides the State of Washington, Department of Game an easement to manage and maintain an area for public fishing bank. Affects: Government Lot 2 in Section 15-Parcel F 33. This item intentionally deleted 34. A document entitled "Agreement" executed by and between Federal Way Water and Sewer District and Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Compnay for construction of water mains and appurtenances recorded December 28, 1980 under recording number 9012281463. Affects: Parcels BLA3-1 & L Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 13 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 35. 36 37 38 39. 40. GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 REVISION 3rd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) Terms and provisions contained in the document entitiled "Agreement' between Federal Way Water and Sewer District and Weyerhaeuser Company, regarding construction of sewer facilities recorded February 18, 1994 under recording number 9402182159. The lien created in paragraph 26 of said agreement was released by instrument recorded under recording no. 9512261712. Affects: Parcels BLA3-1, BLA2-3, F, J, & L Terms and conditions of Federal Way Ordinance No. 94-219 recorded under recording no. 9410260933. Said ordinance was modified by instrument recorded under recording no. 20030513002214. Affects: All Parcels Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewers Recording Date: December 14, 1995 Recording No.: 9512140223 & 951214224 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1 Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewer facilities Recording Date: September 3, 1999 Recording No.: 19990903000827 Affects: Parcels BLA3-1, BLA2-3, & F Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Lakehaven Utility District Purpose: Sewer facilities Recording Date: September 3, 1999 Recording No.: 19990903000829 Affects: Parcel F Subdivision Any prohibition or limitation of use, occupancy, or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any portion which is now or has been formerly covered by water. Affects: Parcels BLA2-3, F, J, & L Printed; 0t.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 14 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 REVISION 3rd Guarantee 41. Paramount rights and easements in favor of the United States for commerce, navigation, fisheries and the production of power. Affects Parcels BLA2-3, F, J, & L 42. Any unrecorded leaseholds, right of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon the Land and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the terms. 43. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-100484-SU: Recording No: 20171103900001 Affects: Parcel BLA3-1 44. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, recitals, reservations, easements, easement provisions, dedications, building setback lines, notes, statements, and other matters, if any, but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth on City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-100455-SU: Recording No: 20171108900002 Affects: Parcel BLA2-3 45. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2018 Tax Account No.: 797820-0420-01 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $3,300,100.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $Not Available Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $Not Available Affects: Portion of Parcel BLA3-1 and other property 2017 taxes in the amount of $45,980.02 are paid in full. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 15 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 3rd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 46. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2018 Tax Account No.: 228500-0010-00 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $4,510,400.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $Not Available Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $Not Available Affects: Remainder of Parcel BLA3-1 and other property 2017 taxes in the amount of $62,843.82 are paid in full. 47. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2018 Tax Account No.: 162104-9030-08 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $3,424,400.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $Not Available Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $Not Available Affects: Parcel BLA2-3 2017 taxes in the amount of $4,653.52 are paid in full. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 16 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 GUARANTEEXERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 3rd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 48. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2018 Tax Account No.: 152104-9178-01 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $4,773,700.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $114,900.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $Not Available Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $Not Available Affects: Parcel F 2017 taxes in the amount of $67,764.31 are paid in full. 49. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2018 Tax Account No.: 162104-9036-02 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $100,800.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $Not Available Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $Not Available Affects: Parcel J 2017 taxes in the amount of $1,407.48 are paid in full. Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02 02 PM Page 17 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO.0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY REVISION 3rd Guarantee SCHEDULE B (continued) 50. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1, second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2018 Tax Account No.: 797820-0520-00 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $173,900.00 Assessed Value -Improvements: $0.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $Not Available Paid: $0.00 Unpaid: $Not Available Affects: Parcel L 2017 taxes in the amount of $2,425.89 are paid in full. 51. A Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing: Amount: $25,000,000.00 Dated: February 9, 2016 Trustor/Grantor: Federal Way Campus, LLC, A Delaware limited liability company Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation Beneficiary: CPIF Lending LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company Recording Date: February 9, 2016 Recording No: 20160209001434 Affects: All Parcels and other property 52. This item intentionally deleted 53. Survey matters as disclosed by recital in deed recorded under recording no. 20160209001433. 54. Terms and conditions of the Limited Liability Company Agreement for the Limited Liability Company under which title is vested. 55. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: King County Water District No. 124 Purpose: water pipe line and all necessary connections and appurtenances Recording Date: November 24, 1976 Recording No.: 7611241038 Affects: Parcel L Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 18 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE B (continued) GUARANTEE/CERTIFICATE NO. 0112694-16 REVISION 3rd Guarantee 56. A Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing: Amount: $57,000,000.00 Dated: December 22, 2017 Trustor/Grantor: Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Centennial Bank Recording Date: December 22, 2017 Recording No: 20171222001170 Affects: All Parcels and other property 57. A financing statement as follows: Debtor: Federal Way Campus, LLC Secured Party: Centennial Bank Recording Date: December 22, 2017 Recording No.: 20171222001171 Affects: All Parcels and other property 58. Subordination, Nondisturbance and Attornment Agreement, and the terms and conditions thereof: Lender: Centennial Bank Tenant: Weyerhaeuser NR Company, a Washington corporation Landlord: Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Recording Date: December 22, 2017 Recording No.: 20171222001172 Affects: All Parcels and other property END OF EXCEPTIONS NOTES The following matters will not be listed as Special Exceptions in Schedule B of the policy. There will be no coverage for loss arising by reason of the matters listed below because these matters are either excepted or excluded from coverage or are not matters covered under the insuring provisions of the policy. END OF NOTES END OF SCHEDULE B Subdivision Guarantee/Certificate Printed: 01.05.18 @ 02:02 PM Page 19 WA-CT-FNSE-02150.622481-SPS-1-17-0112694-16 RESUBMITTED ' When Recorded Return to: JAN 10 2018 McCullough Hill Leary, P.S. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6600 co,MMUNTf DE&&gP&t Eb-copy ii� iiII II II `` Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Courtney A. Kaylor �y 20180108000526 EASEMENT Rec: $88.00 11812018 10:10 AM KING COUNTY, WA DECLARATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT Grantor: Grantee: Abbrev. Legal Desc: Assessor's Tax Parcel #s: Reference #: Federal Way Campus, LLC Federal Way Campus, LLC Portion SE 1/4 Section 16, T 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. Complete legal in Exhibit A and Exhibit B 1621049013 N/A THIS DECLARATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT ("Agreement") is made this yC day of Sao ,,,,Gam , 2017, by Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Declarant"). Recitals A. Declarant is the owner of the real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Burdened Property"). B. Declarant is the owner of the real property located in Federal Way, Washington legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto (`Benefitted Property") C. Declarant is adjusting the boundaries of the Burdened and Benefitted Properties by City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-100455-SU currently under review by the City. D. Declarant wishes to establish an easement to allow the users of the Benefitted Property access over and to place utilities under a portion of the Burdened Property, on the terms and conditions set forth herein. -1- Declaration Now therefore, the Declarant subjects the Benefitted Property and the Burdened Property to the following easement, covenants and conditions: 1. Access and Utilities Easement. Declarant hereby declares and subjects the Burdened Property to a perpetual nonexclusive easement (the "Easement"), which is appurtenant to and runs with the Benefitted Property, over, across and under the real property legally described in Exhibit C and depicted in Exhibit D (the 'Basement Area") for the purpose of ingress and egress between the Benefitted Property and Weyerhaeuser Way South and for utilities. 2. Maintenance of Easement Area. Declarant, as owner of the Benefitted Property, may construct a driveway and utilities within the Easement Area (collectively, "Improvements"), as approved by the City of Federal Way. Declarant, as owner of the Benefitted Property, shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits and approvals for construction of the Improvements, restoring the Easement Area to as good or better a condition as existed prior to the construction of the Improvements, and maintaining the Improvements located within the Easement Area in good and safe condition. 3. Indemnification. Declarant, as owner of the Benefitted Property, shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Declarant, as owner of the Burdened Property, from any and all claims, loss, damage, costs (including the cost of litigation) and liability resulting from any actual or alleged injury to person or property which may arise as the result of the Declarant's use of the Easement Area as owner of the Benefitted Property. 4. No Dedication to the Public. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Area or the improvements thereon to the general public or for any public use. 5. Reservation. Declarant, as owner of the Burdened Property, reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any and all purposes which do not materially interfere with the use and operation of the Easement Area and are not otherwise inconsistent with the rights herein contained. 6. Assi ent; Binding Effect. The Easement and rights granted herein and the conditions herein contained shall be a covenant running with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Declarant and its successors and assigns. 7. No .Merger. It is the intention of the Declarant that the Easement and rights granted herein and covenants herein contained shall not extinguish or terminate by operation of the doctrine of merger or otherwise by reason of existing or future common ownership of the Benefitted Property and Burdened Property. 8. Miscellaneous. Time is of the essence hereof. The headings contained herein shall not be used to interpret the provisions hereof. This Easement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State of Washington. Jurisdiction and venue for any action -2- commenced to enforce this Agreement shall be the County of King, State of Washington. This Agreement may not be modified except by a written agreement signed by Declarant as owner of the Benefitted Party and as owner of the Burdened Parry. Declarant's failure to enforce any provision hereof shall not constitute waiver thereof in any future instance. If any provision hereof is held to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. DECLARANT: FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, By: Print name: T.C. Messmer Title: Vice President — Special Projects -3- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -t C- , Me- -65.n e,/ is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the V1 c-e— of a Delaware limited liability company, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: ,-,. ;J-D , 2017. SLIC r '; O s-2C �rrrrr�kYASH'' . -J� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at Print name: ✓' A- . �a Commission expires: (eL�aj -4- Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No. 1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 CONSULTING ENGINEERS I_LC 6 W EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF BURDENED PROPERTY That portion of Sections 15 and 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southwesterly corner of the East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan as recorded in Volume 191 of Plats, Pages 39 through 45, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 19990916001397, also being a point on the southeasterly margin of Interstate 5; THENCE along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W, 262.01 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, N 73°20'26" W, 25.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W, 744.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 530.85 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 11,335.00 feet, through a central angle of 02°41'00" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 13058'34" W, 983.01 feet to the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 16; THENCE along said south line AND the south line of Government Lot 1 of Section 16, S 88019'11 " E,1348.40 feet to a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 56006'04" E, through a central angle of 03°31'01 "; ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 Sth Ave S, Ste 205 1010SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 253'93BA123it] 425.297.9900te1 30Laser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694 to free 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax vaww.esmcivil.com Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 2 THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 52°35'03" W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 42.23 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1257.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 52035'03" E, through a central angle of 01 °55'30"; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 50039'33" W 15.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing N 50°39'33" W, 37.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet, through a central angle of 0404338" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 71045" 0 to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 83°23'43" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northwesterly 450.72 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 655.00 feet, through a central angle of 39025'36" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northerly 267.17 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 490.00 feet, through a central angle of 31'14'24" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE northerly 109.54 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 515.00 feet, through a central angle of 12'11'11 " to a point of tangency; THENCE N 24011'27" E, 710.81 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northeasterly 297.69 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1525.00 feet, through a central angle of 11011'04" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northeasterly 325.03 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 535.00 feet, through a central angle of 34048'34" to a point of compound curvature; Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 3 THENCE easterly 595.57 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 340.00 feet, through a central angle of 100021'48" to a point of tangency; THENCE S 09027'07" E, 11.23 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE southeasterly 81.34 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 77040'28" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE easterly 175.07 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 500.00 feet, through a central angle of 20003'42" to a point of tangency; THENCE S 67003'53" E, 40.58 feet to a point of curvature on said northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South: THENCE along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 239.28 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1030.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 67°03'53" E, through a central angle of 13018'38" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, S 09°37'29" W, 484.24 feet to a point of curvature; thence continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 770.34 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1170.00 feet, through a central angle of 37043'27" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, S 47020'56" W, 141.77 feet; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 42039'04" W, 7.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, S 47020'56" W, 141.29 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 58.71 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1237.00 feet, through a central angle of 02043'10"; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 45'22'14" W, 7.00 to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 43.31 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1244.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 45022'14" E, through a central angle of 01 059'41 "; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 47°21'55" W, 28.00 feet to a point of curvature; C Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 4 THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 73.13 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1272.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 47021'55" E, through a central angle of 03017'38" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2,096,100 square feet (48.120 acres), more or less. i s l es m-j o bs 1188610011016-0010l d oc u m e ntl l d -002.d o c 201-7 69- `9 -? CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLc Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No.1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITTED PROPERTY That portion of Sections 15 and 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southwesterly corner of the East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan as recorded in Volume 191 of Plats, Pages 39 through 45, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 19990916001397, also being a point on the southeasterly margin of Interstate 5; THENCE along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W, 262.01 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, N 73°20'26" W, 25.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 16039'34" W, 744.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 160.90 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 11,335.00 feet, through a central angle of 00°48'48" to the south line of the northeast quarter of Section 16 (also known as the southerly line of Lot 7 of City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. BLA 99-002 as recorded under Recording No. 9905129004), being a point on said curve AND the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 369.95 feet along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 11,335.00 feet, through a central angle of 01052'12" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 13058'34" W, 983.01 feet to the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 16; ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 Sth Ave S, Ste 205 10105E Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 253.838.6123tel 425.297.9900tel 3D Laser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694 toll free www.esmcivil.com 253.938.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 2 THENCE along said south line AND the south line of Government Lot 1 of Section 16, S 88.1911 " E, 1348.40 feet to a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet, the radius point -of which bears S 56°06'04" E, through a central angle of 03°31'01 "; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 52035'03" W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 42.23 feet along the arc of a non -tangent cure to the right, having a radius of 1257.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 52035'03" E, through a central angle of 01 °55'30"; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 50°39'33" W, 15.00 feet; THENCE continuing N 50°39'33" W, 37.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a tangent cure to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet, through a central angle of 04°43'38" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent cure to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 7104610 to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 83023'43" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northwesterly 450.72 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 655.00 feet, through a central angle of 39°25'36" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northerly 267.17 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 490.00 feet, through a central angle of 31 °14'24" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE northerly 109.54 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 515.00 feet, through a central angle of 12011'11 " to a point of tangency; THENCE N 24011'27" E, 301.93 feet to said south line of the northeast quarter of Section 16; THENCE along said south line, N 88°23'02" W, 640.70 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 3 TOGETHER WITH that portion of said Section 16, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the east quarter corner of said Section 16; THENCE along the east line of said section, S 00054'31 " W, 280.07 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said east line, S 00054'31 " W, 323.27 feet; THENCE N 89005'29" W, 45.00 feet; THENCE S 00054'31 " W, 97.00 feet; THENCE N 89005'29" W, 75.00 feet; THENCE S 00054'31" W, 140.00 feet; THENCE S 84038'11 " E, 84.08 feet to the shoreline of North Lake; THENCE along said shoreline, the following courses: S 1003333" W, 34.75 feet; S 14°50'51 " W, 31.55 feet; S 23°47'48" W, 68.08 feet: S 26000'29" W, 88.68 feet; S 28-36-54" W, 68.59 feet; S 22020'40" W, 41.36 feet; S 10006'33" W, 79.32 feet; S 19°56'27" E, 48.12 feet; S 17-22-15" E, 45.88 feet to the northerly line of that State Plat of said Section 16 as recorded in Volume 41 of Plats, Pages 30 through 32, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 4 THENCE along said northerly line, N 88019'11 " W, 570.29 feet to a point of curvature on the easterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said easterly margin, northeasterly 227.76 feet along the arc of a non -tangent cure to the right, having a radius of 1166.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 53050'34" E, through a central angle of 11011'30" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 47020'56" E, 141.29 feet; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 42039'04" W, 4.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 47020'56" E,141.77 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, northeasterly 767.41 feet along the arc of a tangent cure to the left, having a radius of 1230.00 feet, through a central angle of 35044'50" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 26.2 acres, more or less, with the portion westerly of Weyerhaeuser Way S. being 922,550 s.f. (21.179 acres) more or less and with the portion easterly of Weyerhaeuser Way S. being approximately 5.0 acres. hesm-jo bs 1188610011016-00101docu mentlld-003.doc 4?6/7 09- /� Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No.1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 CONSULTING ENGINEERS LI_c EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA That portion of the southeast quarter of Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the easterly margin of Interstate 5 with the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 16; THENCE along said south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and along the south line of Government Lot 1 of said Section 16, S 88019'11 " E, 1348.40 feet a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way S.; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, the following courses: northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 56006'04" E, through a central angle of 03031'01 "; N 52°35'03" W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature; northeasterly 42.23 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1257.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 52035'03" E, through a central angle of 01 °55'30"; N 50°39'33" W, 15.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing N 50039'33" W, 37.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet, through a central angle of 04043'38" to a point of reverse curvature; ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 Sth Ave S, Ste 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Everett, WA 98208 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture y g P 253.838.6113tel 425.297.9900tel 3D Laser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694 toll free 253.839.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax www.esmcivil.com Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page Two THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 71 045"0" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 83°23'43"; THENCE N 55042'38" E, 60.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE easterly 422.10 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 290.00 feet, the radius point of which bears N 55042'38" E, through a central angle of 83023'43" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE easterly 150.28 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 120.00 feet, through a central angle of 71045'10" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE southeasterly 34.65 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 420.00 feet, through a central angle of 04°43'38" to a point of tangency; THENCE S 50039'33" E, 38.67 feet to said northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way S.; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 60.02 feet along the arc of a non - tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1272.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 47057'20" E, through a central angle of 02042'13" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 39,200 square feet (0.90 acres), more or less. See attached Exhibit D. Written By: CAF B es m-j o bs 118 8 610011016-00101 d o c u m e ntl l d-001. d o c 1 � a •S���tti�ti�rririirrrir/�l� Zor 7- e9 -19 EXHIBIT D DEPICTION OF EASEMENT AREA ri A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SCALE: 1 "=300' I CITY OF FEDERAL .WAY Q BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT F- z NO. 17-100455-SU a LOT I Q LOT 3 EASEMENT AREA POINT OF COMMENCING10 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING �• SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1 /4 OF THE SE 1 /4 AND SOUTH LINE OF GOV. LOT 1 OF SECTION 16 a� p ti 36���� JOB NO. 1886-001-016 DRAWING NAME SR-02 DATE : 2017-09-19 DRAWN C.A.F. SHEET 1 OF 1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC RESUBMITTED January 10, 2017 Job No. 1886-001-016 .BAN 10 2018 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Robert "Doc" Hansen Planning Manager Community Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue S. Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Federal Way Campus, LLC Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment Dear Mr. Hansen: On behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is submitting the enclosed Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application and materials for your review. This BLA follows two recently approved and recorded BLAs: The Greenline Tech Center BLA (17-100455-SU) and the Greenline Headquarters BLA (17-101484-SU). Similar to the previously approved BLAs, we believe the Lakefront BLA will rectify property line locations to meet current requirements for configuration and alignment. Furthermore, this application represents the fourth BLA procedure which accomplishes the same intent of the previously proposed campus wide all-inclusive BLA that was not accepted by the City. The following items are included in this submittal, pursuant to the Boundary Line Adjustment Submittal Checklist: 1. This Cover Letter; 2. Master Land Use Application; 3. Check to the amount of $1,969.00; 4. Sketch of existing parcels and adjusted parcels; 5. Boundary Line Adjustment drawings (6 copies); 6. Existing Conditions Reports (4 copies); 7. Title Report (2 copies); 8. Sealed Lot Closure Calculations (2 copies) ; 61. Rek_or-U &cses& We understand these materials comprise a complete application and look forward to receiving confirmation from the City in the near future. The goal of this BLA is to modify the current property boundaries to respect existing conditions and future improvements. Parcel No. 1521049178 is currently bisected by property owned by Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. After adjustment there will be two separate parcels, one on either side of the State owned property. ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 253.838.6113tel 425.297.9900tel 3D Laser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694 toll free www,esmcivil.com 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax Mr. Robert "Doc' Hansen January 10, 2018 Page 2 Additionally, Parcel No. 1621049030 is bifurcated by Weyerhaeuser Way S right-of-way. The resulting BLA will consolidate this parcel to one side of the public right-of-way. Furthermore, the adjustment of property lines will delineate the meadow along the existing tree line. Please refer to the included sketch for comparison of existing and proposed boundary lines. Wetlands on Parcel No. 1621049030 were previously delineated and approved in the Tech Center BLA (17-100455-SU). Additional wetlands were delineated on Parcel 1521049178 by Talasaea. The included Existing Conditions Report, dated January 8th, 2018 contains the wetland delineations of all parcels involved with this Boundary Line Adjustment, including previously approved wetlands from the previously mentioned project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 253-838-6113. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGIN ERS, LLC . � a MATT REIDER Assistant Planner Enc. Ilesm8lengrlesm-jobsO 886=1 M16-00221documentlletter-001.docx CITY OF Federal Way BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 17-100455-SU CITY OF FEDERAL WAY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON n FOUND 1 314' U4eSS DISC WITH X, SET INS CONCRETE DOWN 0.9 IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) FOUND 1 3/4" BRASS DISC WITH X, SET IN CONCRETE DOWN 1.0' IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) _ FOUND BRASS PIN SET IN CONCRETE. DOWN 1.8', IN CASE (OCTOBER 2015) CENTERUNE N B' W 20 202.04.04 %Owl N 881 W 57.80' (ESM 57,6' (R4) 57.61' 0R3�� S. 336TH STREET 17 16 (PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) z 21 it N 88'15'31' W 2621.32' S.RI oin N 88'15'41' W 2621.64' IESM) 00 e� NN WW n� NN / FOUND 2' BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH SET IN CONCRETE, DOWN 1.0' IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) SHEET INDEX AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL °�?aoie ADDITKUNAL INFORMATION RECORDING NO. VOL/PAGE N 8649'21'-W _(R FOUND 4' X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT N 09'15'S2' W OFT] SEE SHEET 7 FOR WITH 1" BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DOWN 0 6' IN CASE M� '♦- In FOUND 3.5" X 3.5' CONCRETE SCALE: I A = fi MONUMENT WITH 2' BRASS DISC M4.% ��►: #r WITH PUNCH, DOWN 0 65' IN CASE 7mm Q 4D0 0 (SEPTEMBER 2015) ,} !�k �� 1 PORTION OF SW 1/4 NE 1/4. SE 1/4 NE 1/4, NW 1/4 SE 1/4 AND �& h r N 50'13'24' E NE 1/4 SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. AND SW 1/4 NW 1/4 n n �:(�� PARCEL c 6 75.46' OF SECTION 15, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. !!! y FOUND 3" x 3" CONCRETE '9 5vv 5�v y4't. MONUMENT PUNCH. DOWN 0� D ISC WITH CASE ry I4 !! asc- (SEPTEMBER 2015) FOUND 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT �jvv �d� •I•- 2 WITH 2" BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH. 1, N 1 0 N 16 �M1_ W � � A I95J+19.3 a {R4) z I ) JJJ�. ry r DOWN 0.7', IN CASE `! -(SEPTEMBER 2015) -- - I- FOUND 3' N 3' CPETE MONUMENT Wltif BRASS EXISTING T EXISTING LOT LINE Or% WITH F:O . LINE RS I / EGUISHEO A $ DOHH OS' !R -J--I,F•f/ (S€Pl F�1@ER 2D! alI MATCH, 11- ANE $HEM fTY1 ra 40 A ry 4..1 rp- -ilj c3 PARCEL 1 484.24' S EXLS11NCi LOT LBJF A-374S'27' FOVNO 3" x 3' CONCRETE PARCEL H R.120000' MONUMENT WITH 1' BRASS )� L+790.09' DISC WITH PUNCH, DOWOW N 0.6' IN CASE L (SEPTEMBER 2015) P PARCEL H N 4720'56" E 1 283.06' ry 17 NEV LOT i.w y y o f k 1 &.5-00' 13' L�52.07" a V R•59. ) 07' IAA L L4� - J I =2r06'21' R•1200.00' I . I I L•567y70- , I I NI 05-15'23' W FOUND 3' x 3' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 1" BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH, DOWN 0.6' IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) 1 FOUND 4' x 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 2" BRASS DISC WITH X, DOWN 0.4' IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) FOUND 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 2' BRASS DISC WITH X, DOWN 0.3' IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) LEGEND FOR ALL SHEETS (R1) RECORD OF SURVEY BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20100526900003 (R2) WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS PLANS ENTITLED 'SR 18 - MP 0.18 TO MP 1.21 - JCT. SR 5 TO SO. 344TH ST. INTERCHANGE" DATED JULY 10, 1969 (R3) RECORD OF SURVEY BY THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20100512900004 (R4) WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS PLANS ENTITLED 'SR 5 - PIERCE COUNTY LINE TO JCT. SSH NO 5-A' DATED JUNE 24, 1959 PARCEL H EXISTING LOT DESIGNATION 2 NEW LOT DESIGNATION FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED A DELTA R RADIUS L LENGTH (R) RADIAL (37) LOT IN VACATED PLAT OF 'EICHHOLTZ ADDITION, VOLUME 68. PAGE 71 C > RADIAL BEARING (L) BEARING AND DISTANCE PER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ■ SET REBAR AND CAP STAMPED: 'ESM LLC 35142/44925" = I I I 177 77' / - FOUND 2" BRASS DISC WITH 'X' I INID5'15'23" W SET IN CONCRETE, DOWN IN CASE 0.6', I �T9Gj" 11342.69' (SEPTEMBER 2015) - J L - - - - 1 MONUMENTED NORTH FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT LINE OF SECTION 21 WITH 1 /4' BRASS PIN, DOWN 1.0', VACATED S. 336TH STREET L- _ I ~�� A=69'01'16" IN CASE (OCTOBER 2015) HELD FOR CENTERLINE OF ROAD N BB'15'22' W 1740.80' (ESM) N 88-15-52' r I I R=B00.00' AND MONUMENTED EAST LINE OF W 1740.93' (R1) L=72279' SECTION 21. 401"llIENIED SECTION LINE: I _4 N W15'22" W 1004.94' (ESM) N W15'52' W 1994.95' (RI)(R3) . III I N '4'16'39' W 186.80' >- Q MONUMENTED EAST �- - J a'L _ _ eri � ry S. 337TH STREET LINE OF SECTION 21 3 FOUND 1 3/4' BRASS a _^ 4$ c _ -- _ Jr W oa i FOUND 2" BRASS DISC WITH 'x' A.65•T13'3V- r z z + SET IN CONCRETE, DOWN 1.1', R•35DA0• DISC WITH X, SET IN Ws I_ in �, I 1 y I IN CASE L•397 43' W � W Q CONCRETE OOWN 0.3', t I I FOUND 3" BRASS DISC WITH x- SET LN CONCRETE. DOWN 0.9', IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) (SEPTEMBER 2015) �w JJ ! M �. IN CASE ELx- M I I x I9I I I FOUND 3.5" X 3.5' CONCRa I �W eq ' G O N MONUMENT WITH 1' BRAS$ DISC I 1 R-350-W 'SECTION q-W 2T h ^'I[.i'�1 b H Z N Z WOW PUNCH, STAMPED: L-461.70' J ox' N P ~�. LINE', 0.2' AOOK GROUND ••- •� Y •- _ J (SEPTEMBER 2015) `V a I FOUND 2" BRASS / 16609r DISC WITH PUNCH (ESM) SET IN CONCRETE, 21 DOWN 1.0' IN CASE NBB'Z2'17'W 5257.96 (R1) (SEPTEMBER 2015) N88.22'171N 5258.g4'(E541] STA- 1875+63.49 (R3) 2421 - �,1875+62.4 (R4) I FOUND 4" X 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH BRASS PIN, NO PUNCH (SEPTEMBER 2015) � S./ 113.1150372'2(ESMREE1133I' (a 35ND 24 (EES ( R3) vt N 88'31'23" W 2636.53' (ESM) N 88'3T'27" W 26J6+40' (RI)(R3) 28 00 \ a I%I W z rc W TTQ n ti $..�� On ?4l WWa. psi F s^ONC) zg zg a� 3 1 z FOUND 3' BRASS DISC WITF I i PUNCH, SET IN CONCRETE, ! DOWN 2.5', IN CASE 3K (SEPTEMBER 2015) ImCONSULTNG 334 OSTHAIVE.SENGINE RS LLC .SL1)le 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 FEDERAL wAY (253) 1136-e113 www.esmcivil.com D"RLT' (425) 297-99M Civil Engineering Land Surveying Land Planning Public Works I Project Management I Land scope Architecture BASIS OF HORIZONTAL DATUM WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM (WCS) - NORTH ZONE (BASED UPON NAD 53\2011) UTILIZING THE WASHINGTON STATE REFERENCE NETWORK (WSRN) IN NOVEMBER, 2015. SURVEY INSTRUMENTATION SURVEYING PERFORMED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS RECORD OF SURVEY UTILIZED THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES. TWO LEICA SYSTEM 500 DUAL FREQUENCY GPS RECEIVERS. ONE 10" TOTAL STATION MAINTAINED TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY WAC-332-130-100 PROCEDURE USED : REAL TIME KINEMATIC AND RAPID STATIC CPS AND FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACCURACY MEETING OR EXCEEDING THE REQUIREMENTS OF WAC-332-130-090 DRAWING NAME:\1886\001\016-0010\SURVEY PLOTS\BLA2-04.DWG BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PREPARED FOR FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC OWN. BY DATE JOB NO. C.A.F./R.F.G. 2017-09-18 1885-001- 016 CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET C.A.F. 1"=400' 4 OF 10 R E C E I VE q JAN 16 "Ji �C■ITY OF FEDERAL ,�v.:d Nlf ML UM i 1 DE ELOPIYIE:V l CITY OF Federal Way BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 18—_—_ —SU CITY OF FEDERAL WAY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON SHEET INDEX AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL 9 N 88'20'53' W 20300.15' (ESM) �9 10 IBA 1.f86.831213.32' v {E51+) / (ESM) 121J.4' (R4) -' 6 75 N 89'44'49' W /S. 320TH STREET 845.88' I (PUBLIC RGHT OF WAY) FOUND 2" IRON PIPE FILLED WITH -- 4 CONCRETE WITH FINISH NAIL, U GOWN 0.7', IN CASE .L e �v (SEPTEMBER 2015) Gi 13 [iy N 2 5E 278 4 4 �,►, 27s s' FOUND 3' x 3' CONCRETE Z W MONUMENT WITH I' BRASS USC_ q WITH PUNCH, UUWN U.� IN CAS: (SEPTEMBER 2015) •+'e 6 FOUND 4" X 4" CONCRETE MONUMENT Fo-r -• z WITH 2' BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH, FOUND 2" IRON PIPE DOWN 0.7', IN CASE --�/ - FILLED WITH CONCRETE � I (SEPTEMBER 2075) WITH LACK, DOWN 1.0', I IN CA, E (SEPTEMBER 2015) `m w EXISTING 1-01 �• LINE. REMAINS 0 16 -- - -• na _ - N OW37'29' E yry^ (RM —16 1 484.24' I953,, J (R4) 1 � I 04 n„�� A, SEE E' a HE . 10 ARAR k FOUND 3' < 3" CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 1' BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH, EL BLA2-3 DOWN 0.6IN CASE q (SEPTEMBER 2015) R=1200.00' �- NEW LOT LINE L=790.09- S• P-k �,��(•,c',P, - TCH LNE E IST NGI LOT =LINE EXTINGUISHED yP�G.S.•� FOUND 1-3/4" BRASS DISC WITH X, SET IN CONCRETE DOWN 0.9. o L A-V '13` IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) lyy R_ 4'I�4P, FOUND 1-3/4" BRASS DISC WITH +T� X. SET IN CONCRETE DOWN 1.0' 2- SEE IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) HEET y� �W1 y+n o FOUND BRASS PIN SET IN CONCRETE, 9 ' :p81) DOWN 1.8', IN CASE (OCIOBER 701 a) CENTERLINE= G' l ,1�,•39 91' , 0 \ -' N Sir 11'07' W 2112,04, N 88'15'22' W 57.80' (ESU uI Q+* ' W ,%t it ry NOS' 15'7.3' W 07.6' (R4) 57.81' (R;i l 1 a it, 177.77' S. 336TH STREET �+ ETA N 05*1 fig' W--_17 16 // (PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) z - •RJ - N B8'IS'31' W 2621.32' (�M) N 8B'1S'22' W 1740.80' (ESM) - - in I N BB' IS'41 ` W 2fi7 L6¢' (( N 88'15'52' W 1740.93' (RI o- MONUAIENTEU SECTION LINE: low 1 +I N BB'15'22" W 1994.94: (ESM) N 88'15'52' W 1994.95(Rl)(R3) #. nC2 �•{ FOUND 2" BRASS DISC WITH `" A><&S[AS'3B' FOUND 1-3/4" BRASS N m s ^ SET IN CONCRETE. DOWN 1.1', Ray59.gD' DISC WITH X, SET 114 o n 20 21 IN CASE 1 L=]47.4: w i w a: CONCRETE DOWN 0,3', 1 (SEPTEMBER 2015) w � IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) z 7u a FOUND 3.5` X 3,5" CONCRETE cq MONUMENT WITH I' BRASS DISC FOUND 2" BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH SET IN o mw z iO z WITH PUNCH, STAMPED: "SECTION >? v+►„ N O UNE', 0.2' ABOVE GROUND CONCRETE, DOWN 1.0' W. rym q RY ' (SEPTEMBER 2015) IN CASE s-y2q Q;a (SEPTEMBER 2015) . FOUND 2" BRASS RECORDING NO. I VOL/PAGE SCALE: 1% 11 H,cA - 4 TL d-1 R-7003CO2' PORTION OF SW 1/4 NW 1/4 AND NW 1/4 SW 1/4 OF SECTION 15 AND L-604.93' NW 1/4 SL 1/-' AND NE 1/4 SE 1/4 AND SE 1/4 N- 1/4 AND SW 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16_ T 21 N., R. 4 E.. W.M., T_21 N�R. 4 E.. W.M. FUJNU .5 x .3 CUNCKt ItMONUMENT WITH 1" BRASS DISC WITH FUNCH. INCASE (SLPIEMUEH 2U15) TYPICAL TO NORTII ON LHIS CENTERLINE E SHEET 7 E SHEET 8 EXISTING LOT LINE EXTINGUISHED -- PARCEL J PARCEL 8LA2-J H 4T20'56' E 2B3,OG' FOUND 3- x 3" CONCRETE MONUMENT YIITI4 1' BRASS DISC WITH PUNCH, DOWN 0.6'IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) EXISTING LOT LINE EXTINGUISHED PARCEL L FOUND 4' x 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 2" BRASS DISC WITH X, DOWN 0.4' IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) FOUND 4' X 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT WITH 2' BRASS DISC WITH X. DOWN 0.3' IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) FOUND 2" BRASS DISC WITH 'X' SET IN CONCRETE, DOWN 0.6', IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) �-- MONUMENTED NORTH FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT LINE OF SECTION 21 WITH 1/4" BRASS PIN, DOWN 1 0'. IN CASE (OCTOBER 2015) A=69,01" B" R=000.00' L=722.7D' HELD FOR CENTERLINE OF ROAD AND MONUMENTED EAST LINE OF SECTION 21. r N 16'39" W i r 186.80' .8 )+) S. 337TH STREET Q - MONUMENTED FAST -may^ LINE OF SECTION 21 :n 3 A=75'30'48" R=350.00'' L=451.29' id iTi DISC WITH PUNCH 1660.97- (ESM) SET IN CONCRETE, 1V rY t 2;{ DOWN 1.0' IN CASE N88'22'1 /'W 525 nn 111 (SEPTEMBER 2015) NBB'22't 7'W 5259 STA 1875+63 49 (R3) 20f 21 - z i STA 1875+62.4 (R4) 1 FOUND 4' X 4" CONCRETE / MONUMENT WITH BRASS PIN, 1503.72' (ESM) NO PUNCH (SEPTEMBER 2015) 1133.1' (H4] 2 21 S. 352ND STREET _ 1132.91' (&)(R3) 1 2 R—N 8B731'23' W 2636.53' (ESM) N 96'31'27" W 2636,40' (R7 )(R3 FOUND 3' BRASS DISC WITH "X' SET IN CONCRETE, DOWN 0.9', IN CASE (SEPTEMBER 2015) a j to z O -J �LJ w z� �FF Q MU o„� CIN LJ v ` Q < LIJ i r FOUND 3' BRASS DISC WITH i 0 PUNCH, SET IN CONCRETE. DOWN 2.5', IN CASE trr.� 2 (SEPTEMBER 2015) LEGEND FOR ALL SHEETS (R1) RECORD OF SURVEY BY 1HE W45HINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECORDED TINDER RFCORD'NG NO 20100526900003 (R3) RECORD OF SURVEY BY THE WASH14GTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20100512900004 (R4) WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION. DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS PLANS ENTITLED 'SR 5 - PIERCE COUNTY LINE TO JCT. SSH NO. 5 A DATED JUNE 24, 1958 PARCEL H EXISTING LOT DESIGIIATION 2 NEW LOT DESIGNATION FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED A DELTA R RADIUS L LENGTH (R) RADIAL < > RADIAL BEARING (L) SEARING AND DISTANCE PER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ■ SET REBAR AND CAP STAMPED: 'ESM LLC 35142/44925" V FOUND CORNER AS NOTED 3 00 THAIVE S. NG NGiNEERS LLG Im 3 Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 FEDERN. WAY (253) U38-6113 www.esmcivil.com EVMErr (425) 291-990D Civil Engineering Land Surveying Land Planning Public Works Project Management I Landscape Architecture BASIS OF HORIZONTAL DATUM WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM (WCS) - NORTH ZONE (BASED UPON NAD 83\2D11) UTILIZING THE WASHINGTON STATE REFERENCE NETWORK (WSRN) IN SEPTEMBER, 2015 SURVEY INSTRUMENTATION: SURVEYING PERFORMED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS RECORD OF SURVEY UTIL17CO THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT AVD PROCEDURES TWO LEICA SYSTEM 500 DUAL FREQUENCY CPS RECEIVERS. ONE 10" TOTAL STATION MAINTAINED TO MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AS RLOUIRED BY WAC-332-130-100 PROCEDURE USED : REAL TIME KINEMATIC AND RAPID STATIC CPS AND FIELD TRAVERSE WITH ACCURACY MEETING OR EXCEEDING THE REQUIREMENTS OF WAC-332-130-090 DRAWING NAME:\1886\001\016-0022\SURVEY PIOTS\BEAR-05 DWC BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT PREPARED FOR FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC DWN BY DATE JOB NO C.A.F./R F.G. 2018-01-05 1886-OD1-016 CHKD. BY SCALE SHEET C.A.F. 1"=400' 6 OF 10 RESU[3MITTED 1k JAN 10 20"d CITY OF ;z� CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Federal Way COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO(S) I L.J Project Name Greenline Lakefront BLA MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8 s Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-855-2609 WW%%.ci tvaFfederalwnv.com Date t i D i ) �? Property Address/Location SE Qtr of Section 16, Township 21, Range 4 and NW Qtr of Section 15, Township 21, Range 4 Parcel Number(s) 1521049178,1621049036, 1621049030, 7978200520, 2285000010 Project Description PLEASE PRINT BLA to allocate property along North Lake for conservation of natural environment and to adjust existing parcel boundaries so that they do not cross Weyerhaeuser Way S. Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan X Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process ID (Project Approval) Process iV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) _ Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information CP-01 Zoning Designation Coorporate Park Comprehensive Plan Designation ,V'aiue of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: Tom Messmer c/o Federal Way Campus, LLC Address: 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90025 Phone: (310) 261-4382 Fax: Eniail:tmessmer rialreaitygroup.com Signature: C� Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Eric LaBrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Address: 33400 8th Ave S, Suite 205 City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-8386113 Fax: 253-838-7104 Email: eric.labde@esmcivii.com Signature:I Owner Name: Tom Messmer c/o Federal Way Campus, LLC Address:1 I100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90025 Phone: (310) 261-4382 Fax: Email: tmessmer@industrialrealtygroup.com Signature: Bulletin #003 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of I k:lHandoutslMaster Land Use Applicatio- GFTTI TALASALA CONSULTANTS, INC. 20 April 2018 TAL-1572 RESUBMITTED Jim Harris City of Federal Way Department of Community Development MAY 0 3 2018 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98003 CfTY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNfTY DEVELOPMENT REFERENCE: Existing Conditions Report Review Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA), Federal Way, Washington File #18-100123-SU SUBJECT: Response to Comments dated 4 April 2018 Dear Jim: In response to ESA's comments regarding the Existing Conditions Report Review — Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment dated 4 April 2018, we are providing the following responses. As is typical with our procedure for response letters, we will be providing ESA comments verbatim in bold text. Our responses will follow each comment in italic text. Parcel J Parcel J is relatively small and contains part of Wetland BD North. • Comment: ESA agrees with the delineation and classifications of the portion of Wetland BD that lies in this parcel. The wetland extends to the south onto Parcels BLA2-3 and L, which were reviewed previously, and to the north onto Parcel F, reviewed below. Recommendation: None needed. Talasaea response: Noted. No additional response required. Parcel F Parcel F contains all of part of 13 wetlands including two large wetlands along the shore of North Lake (Wetlands BD and CD), several small wetlands near the shore (Wetlands BL, BE, BF, BK, PK, BA, BA-2, BB, and CG), and two wetlands adjacent to Weyerhaeuser Way S (Wetlands CE and CB). We have the following comments and recommendations regarding the wetlands in Parcel F. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 9 Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 Jim Harris 20 April 2018 Page 2 of 4 Comment: Although we agree with the delineated boundaries of Wetlands BE and BF, we do not agree with the Cowardin classifications designated in the Report. Wetland BE is classified as palustrine forested (PFO) in the Report. However, we not observe any trees rooted in this small wetland. Vegetation was dominated by herbaceous species, primarily creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) and soft rush (Juncus effusus). Wetland BF is classified as palustrine scrub -shrub (PSS) in the Report. However, we observed an overstory of red alder (Alnus rubra) throughout the wetland. Recommendation: We recommend that Wetland BE be re-classified as PEM and Wetland BF be re-classified as PFO. Talasaea response: Wetland BE and BF Cowardin classification changes have been addressed in the Feature Summary Table (Appendix D), as recommended above. Comment: Wetland CE is a small depression immediately adjacent to Weyerhaeuser Way S. The primary hydrology input is stormwater runoff from the road. Saturation was observed within 12 inches of the surface. Vegetation was sparse and dominated by facultative species common to disturbed areas such as creeping buttercup and stinging nettle (Urtica dioica). We did not observe hydric soil conditions at the time of our visit. According to the Report, hydric soil indicators were not observed but assumed to be present based on the presence of surface water and hydrophytic vegetation. Recommendation: Given the typed of vegetation and lack of hydric soil indicators, this delineation appeared to be a conservative effort during a wetter than normal winter (December 2015). This is consistent with other delineation we have reviewed on the property. Based on the lack of hydric soil indicators during the March 2018 site visit, we disagree that this area is in fact wetland and recommend it be removed from the Report. Talasaea response: Wetland CE has been removed from the Report, appendices, and supporting graphics. This is consistent with the feedback received from James Carsner, Project Manager, US Army Corps of Engineers. Comment: Wetland CD is a large PFOIPSS lake fringe wetland. We general agree with the boundary identified by Talasaea. However, during the March 19, 2018 site visit, wetlands conditions were not observed in the small area adjacent to the boat ramp access road, located northwest of the larger wetland area. Within this portion of the wetland, saturation was present, but hydrophytic vegetation was not. The area was dominated by salal (Gaultheria shallon), which has an indicator status of facultative -up (FACU). In addition, no hydrologic connection to the larger Wetland CD unit was observed. A ditch is present on the east site of the boat ramp access road that runs adjacent to the small Wetland CD area and continues southeast towards the lake. Hydrophytic vegetation and shallow surface water were observed in the ditch during the March 2018 site visit. The upland area between the ditch and Wetland Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 J Jim Harris 20 April 2018 Page 3 of 4 CD consists of road fill, id general clear of vegetation, and did not appear to be hydrologically connected to Wetland CD. It is possible that during a period of very heavy rain, the ditch could fill and water could run from the ditch into the larger Wetland CD area, which may have been observed by Talasaea during the December 2015 delineation. Recommendation: We recommend that the small isolated area flagged as Wetland CD along the boat ramp road be revisited, and that the connection to the larger Wetland CD be reevaluated. Talasaea response: Talasaea conducted a site visit on 17 April 2018 to evaluate the small area of Wetland CD adjacent to the boat ramp. We concur with ESA's conclusion that this small area did not meet the definition of a wetland. This area was originally delineated during high rainfall in December 2015 in an effort to be conservative, and had not been revisited until now. This area has since been removed from the total square footage as presented in the Feature Summary Table (Appendix D) and the supporting graphics. The remainder of Wetland CD remains as previously identified and delineated. • Comment: In Wetland CG, we observed several "CG" delineation flags located well outside of the apparent wetland boundary. However, we generally agree with the boundary of Wetland CG as it was mapped in the CAD file, which appeared to contain boundary points from several different delineation efforts. Recommendation: None needed. Talasaea response: Noted. No additional response required. Offsite Wetlands ■ Comment: The Report includes review of two offsite wetlands (Wetland DF and DG). ES reviewed and agreed with the delineated boundaries. Recommendation: None needed. Talasaea response: Noted. No additional response required. We would like to note that the Report and Feature Summary Table (Appendix D) as submitted on 8 January 2018 indicated a total of 48 wetlands as occurring within the Project Area. Upon further investigation (it was determined that two wetlands were counted twice), a total of 50 wetlands occurred within the Project Area. After deleting Wetland CE, a total of 49 wetlands occur within the Project Area. This revised number has been reflected in the Report and appendices. For simplicity sake, we are providing a revised copy of the Lakefront BLA Existing Conditions Report with revised wetland numbers, attachments, and graphics. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 Jim Harris 20 April 2018 Page 4 of 4 We trust that the information presented here sufficiently answers your comments pertaining to this project. If you have additional questions or require more information, please contact Bill Shiels or me at (425) 861-7550. Thank you. Sincerely, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Jennifer M. Marriott, PWS Senior Ecologist Attachments: Revised Lakefront BLA Existing Conditions Report cc: Mr. Tom Messmer, FWC, LLC File Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAKEFRONT BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT (PARCELS F, J, L, BLA 2-3, AND BLA 3-1) FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Prepared For. Federal Way Campus, LLC Los Angeles, CA 90025 Prepared By. TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Woodinville, Washington 8 January 2018 (Revised 20 April 2018) Existing Conditions Report Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Federal Way Campus, LLC Federal Way, Washington Prepared For. Tom Messmer Federal Way Campus, LLC 11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 850 Los Angeles, CA 90025 Prepared By. Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 150250 Bear Creek Road NE Woodinville, Washington 98077 (425) 861-7550 8 January 2018 (Revised 20 April 2018) Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT NAME: Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3 and BLA 3-1) APPLICANT: Tom Messmer, Vice President, Federal Way Campus, LLC PROJECT LOCATION: The address for the Property is 32820 32"d Avenue South in the City of Federal Way, Washington. The Property is comprised of five (5) parcels. The Public Land Survey System location of the Property is Sections 15 and 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. PROJECT STAFF: Bill Shiels, Principal; Jennifer Marriott, PWS, Senior Ecologist; David Teesdale, PWS, Senior Wetland Ecologist; Richard Tveten, Senior Ecologist; and Kristen Numata, Ecologist. FIELD SURVEY: Property evaluations and wetland delineations were performed on multiple days from December 2015 through August 2017. DETERMINATION: Forty-nine (49) wetlands were identified on the Property, with an additional three (3) wetlands located adjacent to the Property within 100 feet. Sections of one (1) stream (fish -bearing) and three (3) swales are located on the Property. North Lake occurs adjacent to the eastern parcels of the Property. Weyerhaeuser Pond is located approximately 300 feet south of the Property. HYDROLOGY: Hydrology for the on -site wetlands is supported by seasonal precipitation and interception of surface water flow, as well as groundwater movement to a lesser extent. SOILS: The NRCS maps two soil map units over the Property: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes over the majority and Orcas Peat in a small portion along the eastern property boundary. The National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils does not include Alderwood gravelly sandy loam as a hydric soil, however, Orcas Peat is identified as a hydric soil. VEGETATION: The Property is mix of developed and managed areas with conifer and deciduous mixed forests. Typical native species present within the forested areas include Douglas fir, western red cedar, big -leaf maple, red alder, black cottonwood, salmonberry, vine maple, sword fern, and other native herbaceous and shrub species. Several non-native species of tree are present throughout the property, including several species of eastern oak and European ash. Typical vegetation within the wetlands includes salmonberry and hardhack with limited amounts of sedges and rushes. English ivy is present across the Property in varying densities. 20 April 2018 Copyright C 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page i Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................... Tableof Contents........................................................................ Listof Figures..................................................................................................................iii List of Tables Listof Appendices...........................................................................................................iii Chapter1. Introduction................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Report ...............................................................................1 1.2 Statement of Accuracy........................................................................1 1.3 Qualifications......................................................... . ............. . . Chapter 2. Property Description.................................................................................. 2 2.1 Property Location................................................................................ 2 2.2 Existing Property Development........................................................... 2 2.3 Historical Land Uses........................................................................... 3 Chapter3. Methodology.............................................................................................. 3 3.1 Background Data Reviewed................................................................3 3.2 Field Investigation...............................................................................4 Chapter4. Results....................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Analysis of Existing Information........................................................... 5 4.1.1 USGS Quadrangle.............................................................................. 5 4.1.2 National Wetland Inventory ................................................................. 5 4.1.3 Natural Resources Conservation Service ............................................ 5 4.1.4 King County GIS Database................................................................. 5 4.1.5 SalmonScape and StreamNet.............................................................5 4.2 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Wetlands ......................................... 6 4.2.1 Parcel F............................................................................................... 7 4.2.2 Parcel J............................................................................................... 7 4.2.3 Parcel L............................................................................................... 7 4.2.4 Parcel BLA 2-3.................................................................................... 7 4.2.5 Parcel BLA 3-1.................................................................................... 8 4.3 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Streams and Other Features .......... 8 4.3.1 North Lake...........................................................................................8 4.3.2 Stream AC........................................................................................... 8 4.3.3 Non -regulated Swales......................................................................... 8 Chapter 5. Wildlife and Listed Species........................................................................ 9 5.1 Wildlife Surveys and Assessments...................................................... 9 5.2 Listed Species..................................................................................... 9 Chapter 6. Regulatory Review...................................................................................10 6.1 Shoreline Management Zone (SMZ).................................................10 6.2 Non-SMZ Wetlands...........................................................................10 6.3 Streams.............................................................................................11 Chapter7. Summary .................. ...............................................................................11 Chapter8. References.............................................................................................. 12 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page ii Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Vicinity Map and Driving Directions Figure 2: Property Parcel Map Note: Figures are located at the end of the report before the appendices. LIST OF TABLES Table 1: FWRC Wetland Buffer Requirements in SMZ (FWRC 15.10.250) Table 2: FWRC Wetland Buffer Requirements Outside of SMZ (FWRC 19.145.420) APPENDICES Appendix A: Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment Approval, dated 27 October 2017 (Permit No. 17-100455-00-SU) Appendix All: Greenline Technology Center BLA, Wetland Determination Data Forms, Talasaea Consultants, 2015 — 2017 Appendix A2: Greenline Technology Center BLA, Wetland Rating Forms with Figures, Talasaea Consultants, 2017 Appendix B: Greenline Headquarters BLA, dated 30 October 2017 (Permit No. 17- 100484-00-S U ) Appendix 131: Greenline Headquarters BLA, Wetland Determination Data Forms, Talasaea Consultants, 2015 — 2017 Appendix 132: Greenline Headquarters BLA, Wetland Rating Forms with Figures, Talasaea Consultants, 2017 Appendix C: Remaining Wetlands in Lakefront BLA Appendix Cl: Remaining Wetlands in Lakefront BLA, Wetland Determination Data Forms, Talasaea Consultants, 2015 — 2017 Appendix C2: Remaining Wetlands in Lakefront BLA, Wetland Rating Forms with Figures, Talasaea Consultants, 2018 Appendix D: Feature Summary Table, Talasaea Consultants, 2018 Appendix E: Photodocument, Talasaea Consultants, 2017 Appendix F: Existing Conditions Plan Sheets Sheet W1.0. Existing Conditions Overview Plan & Sheet Key Sheet W1.1. Existing Conditions Plan Sheet W1.2. Existing Conditions Plan Sheet W1.3. Existing Conditions Plan Sheet W1.4. Existing Conditions Plan 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page iii Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION Existing Conditions Report 1.1 Purpose of Report This report is the result of an existing conditions study for a 74-acre project area that is a part of the Federal Way Campus, LLC (FWC, LLC) property (referred to hereinafter as the "Property"). The Property is located in Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). The Property is comprised of five (5) parcels identified internally as Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 (Figure 2). The latter two parcels have been adjusted and approved under boundary line adjustment (BLA) projects #17-10045-00-SU and #17-100484-00- SU, respectively (Attachment A and B). This report has been prepared to comply with the requirements of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.145.080 — Critical area report to summarize the existing conditions of the Property. No development proposals, critical areas impacts or mitigation are included within this report. This report will provide and describe the following information: • General property description; • Methodology for critical areas investigation; • Results of critical areas background review and field investigation; • Existing property conditions; and • Regulatory review. 1.2 Statement of Accuracy Stream and wetland characterizations were conducted by trained professionals at Talasaea Consultants, Inc., and adhered to the protocols, guidelines, and generally accepted industry standards available at the time the work was performed. The conclusions in this report are based on the results of analyses performed by Talasaea Consultants and represent our best professional judgment. To that extent and within the limitation of project scope and budget, we believe the information provided herein is accurate and true to the best of our knowledge. Talasaea does not warrant any assumptions or conclusions not expressly made in this report, or based on information or analyses other than what is included herein. 1.3 Qualifications Field investigations and evaluations were conducted by Bill Shiels, Principal; Jennifer Marriott, PWS, Senior Ecologist; David R. Teesdale, PWS, Senior Wetland Ecologist; Richard Tveten, Senior Ecologist; and Kristen Numata, Ecologist. Bill Shiels has a Bachelor's Degree in Biology from Central Washington University and a Master's Degree in Biological Oceanography from the University of Alaska. He has over 40 years of experience in wetland delineations and mitigations. Jennifer Marriott has a Bachelor's Degree and a Master's Degree in Biology from University of Central Florida, and a second Master's Degree in Soil and Environmental Science from the University of Florida. She has 15 years of experience in wetland delineations and environmental permitting. David Teesdale has a Bachelor's Degree in Biology from Grinnell College, Iowa, and a Master's Degree in Ecology from Illinois State University. He has over 20 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 1 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report years of experience in wetland delineations and biological evaluations. Richard Tveten has a Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Biology from Western Washington University with a focus on terrestrial ecology and fire ecology, respectively. Richard has worked for the public and private sectors for 20 years in wetlands, water quality, and forest management. Kristen Numata has a Bachelor's Degrees in Biology and Environmental Science from Santa Clara University. CHAPTER 2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2.1 Property Location The Property is comprised of five (5) parcels currently owned by Federal Way Campus, LLC (FWC, LLC) identified internally as Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 (Figure 2). A complete list of King County Parcel numbers, and their letter association, is provided on Figure 2. Boundary line adjustment (BLA) parcel boundaries have been recently approved by the City of Federal Way (Attachment A and B), therefore there are no King County Parcel numbers yet assigned. The Property address is 32820 32" d Avenue South in the City of Federal Way, Washington for the northeast most parcel. The Property is approximately 74 acres in size. The remainder of the associated parcels under FWC, LLC ownership are not a part of this project. The Public Land Survey System location of the Property is Sections 15 and Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. The topography of the Property west of Weyerhaeuser Way South, is gently sloping downhill from the north to the south. The properties east of Weyerhaeuser Way South slope east to North Lake. The Property is bound to the east by North Lake, to the south by South 336th Street, and Interstate 5 abuts the western edge of the Property. Other property owned by the Applicant occurs north of the Property that is partially developed as a technology center with large areas of open parking. The former Weyerhaeuser headquarters building (now known as the Greenline Headquarters Building) is located south of the Property across from Weyerhaeuser Pond. 2.2 Existing Property Development The Property is currently developed with a portion of the stormwater facility associated with the Weyerhaeuser Tech Center and associated infrastructure, as well as portions of gravel access roads and a private trail system that meanders throughout the remainder of the Property. The stormwater pond is located southwest of the Tech Center within the Property and collects runoff from all of the roads and parking areas associated with the Tech Center. This pond discharges south into an artificial channel, now a naturalized stream, before ultimately discharging into Weyerhaeuser Pond. A gas pipeline easement extends along the interstate frontage along the west edge of the property. A vacated single family residence is located on the lakeshore properties east of Weyerhaeuser Way S near the northwest corner of the lake. 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 2 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report 2.3 Historical Land Uses The land at the north end of North Lake was historically developed as far back as the 1930s, based on accessible historical aerial photographs (www.historicaeriaIs. com). The 1936 aerial photograph reflects docks present all along the eastern shore of North Lake as well as around the northwest corner of the lake, along the existing shoreline within the Property. The 1964 aerial photograph clearly shows a development of some kind that had multiple docks, buildings, and infrastructure. Evidence of wetland fill is noticeable between the 1936 and 1964 aerial photographs. This facility appears to have been abandoned around the time Weyerhaeuser purchased the property. The 1980 aerial photograph seems to show the area being left to vegetate naturally. The previously apparent docks along this section of shoreline are no longer present in current aerial imagery. In addition to the old developments around North Lake, there is evidence of houses and residential areas along the old alignment of South 336th Street. These areas were maintained through the 1960s, but appear to be overgrown by 1969, and by 1980 this area was completely redeveloped as part of the Weyerhaeuser Campus construction. CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY The critical areas analysis of the Property involved a two-part effort. The first part consisted of a preliminary assessment of the Property and the immediate surrounding area using published environmental information. This information includes: 1) Wetland and soils information from resource agencies; 2) Critical Areas information from King County and the City of Federal Way; 3) Orthophotography and LIDAR imagery; and, 4) Relevant studies completed or ongoing in the vicinity of the Property. The second part consisted of Property investigations where direct observations and measurements of existing environmental conditions were made. Observations included plant communities, soils, hydrology, and stream conditions. This information was used to help characterize the Property and define the limits of critical areas on -site and off - site for regulatory purposes (see Section 3.2 — Field Investigation below). 3.1 Background Data Reviewed Background information from the following sources was reviewed prior to field investigations: • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Wetlands Online Mapper (National Wetlands Inventory) (USFWS, 2018) (www.wetiandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtinds/launch.htmi); • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Web Soil Survey (NRCS, 2018) www.websollsurve .nres.usda. ovla 1); • King County GIS Database (King County iMap, 2018); • Orthophotography from USDA's National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP 2018), Earth Explorer (USGS), and Google Earth; 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 3 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 Existing Conditions Report Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) Mapper; ■ Salmonscape (WDFW) (http://wdfw.wa.4ov/mapping/salmonscape); ■ StreamNet (The Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission) (littp://www.streamnet.org/data/interaGtive-maps-and-gis-data/) USFWS listed species data; and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 3.2 Field Investigation Talasaea Consultants originally evaluated the Property as part of a larger effort for Federal Way Campus, LLC beginning in December 2015. Talasaea re -verified the wetland boundaries in April 2016 once water levels returned to a normal state after the extremely high rains of December 2015. Brief site evaluations have been conducted since to verify that previously delineated boundaries are still appropriate. Wetland boundaries were evaluated by Ecological Science Associates (ESA) through the City of Federal Way between April and June 2017 as part of two (2) previous boundary line adjustment requests. Approval of these previous two (2) BLA applications was granted in October 2017. Our wetland delineation utilized the routine approach described in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Western Mountain, Valleys, and Coast Regions (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2010). Plant species were identified according to the taxonomy of Hitchcock and Cronquist (Hitchcock, et al. 1969). Taxonomic names were updated and plant wetland status was assigned according to North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List, Version 2.4.0 (Lichvar, et al. 2012). Wetland classes were determined with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's system of wetland classification (Cowardin, et al. 1979). Vegetation was considered hydrophytic if greater than 50% of the dominant plant species had a wetland indicator status of facultative or wetter (i.e., facultative, facultative wetland, or obligate wetland). Wetland hydrology was determined based on the presence of hydrologic indicators listed in the Corps' Regional Supplement. These indicators are separated into Primary Indicators and Secondary Indicators. To confirm the presence of wetland hydrology, one Primary Indicator or two Secondary Indicators must be demonstrated. Indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not necessarily limited to: drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition, watermarks, stream gauge data and flood predictions, historical records, visual observation of saturated soils, and visual observation of inundation. Soils on the Property were considered hydric if one or more of the hydric soil indicators listed in the Corps Regional Supplement were present. Indicators include presence of organic soils, reduced, depleted, or gleyed soils, or redoximorphic features in association with reduced soils. 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 4 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report An evaluation of patterns of vegetation, soil, and hydrology was made along the interface of wetland and upland. Wetland boundary points were then determined from this information and marked with wire flags or surveyors tape. Appendix All, Appendix B1 and Appendix C1 contains data forms prepared by Talasaea for representative locations in both upland and wetland locations. The data forms within these appendices are divided by those previously reviewed under the approved BLAs (Appendices Al and 61), and then those wetlands that have not been previously reviewed (Appendix C1). These data forms document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology information that aided in the wetland boundary determination. CHAPTER 4. RESULTS This section describes the results of our in-house research and field investigations. 4.1 Analysis of Existing Information The following sources provided information on Property conditions based on data compiled from resource agencies and local government. 4.1.1 USGS Quadrangle The Property occurs on the Poverty Bay quadrangle. Weyerhaeuser Pond is mapped immediately north of the Greenline Headquarters building south of the Property. North Lake is mapped adjacent to the east property boundary. No stream features are indicated on this map. 4.1.2 National Wetland Inventory The NWI maps a large wetland complex along the north shoreline of North Lake that is classified as a palustrine scrub-shrub/emergent, persistent, seasonally flooded wetland (PSS/EM1C) and a palustrine emergent (persistent)/palustrine scrub -shrub, semi - permanently flooded (PEM1/SSF) wetland. One stream is mapped along the southern edge of the Property flowing westbound, though this feature is not present in the field. 4.1.3 Natural Resources Conservation Service The NRCS maps one type of soil over the majority of the Property, Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes. Orcas Peat is mapped over a small area in the far eastern portion of the Property near an existing wetland that is adjacent to North Lake. The National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils does not include Alderwood gravelly sandy loam as a hydric soil, though Orcas Peat is identified as a hydric soil. 4.1.4 King County GIS Database King County identifies North Lake as a wetland unit occurring adjacent to the northeast portion of the Property. A stream is (accurately, based on field visits) mapped as exiting North Lake and flowing through Weyerhaeuser Pond before draining south under Highway 18. 4.1.5 SalmonScape and StreamNet SalmonScape maps portions of one (1) stream within the Property, consistent with the inaccurate mapped streams on NWI. SalmonScape does not map any salmonids as 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 5 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report occurring within the Property nor within North Lake. Mapping of salmonid presence stops roughly 1-mile south of the Property, as the crow flies. StreamNet maps no streams within the vicinity of the property. The outlet for North Lake is shown consistent with the King County GIS database, and also does not note any salmonids as occurring within the Property, or within North Lake. Mapping of salmonids appears to stop more than 1.5 miles downstream. 4.2 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Wetlands The Property west of Weyerhaeuser Way South is currently comprised of the undeveloped lands located around the former Weyerhaeuser Tech Center (Greenline Tech Center). The majority of the Property in this area is a blend of conifer/deciduous mixed forests, though the forested areas are separated by the roads and trails, and a maintained meadow. The stormwater pond on -site collects runoff from much of the existing development (off -site), and conveys the treated water downstream through a man-made channel. The channel (identified as Stream AC) flows southward to its confluence with a perennial stream that connects North Lake to the Weyerhaeuser Pond. North Lake abuts the eastern edge of the Property, and is a Shoreline of the State. The areas on the east side of Weyerhaeuser Way South are separated by an access road to a public boat ramp managed by WDFW. North of this boat ramp road are the northern limits of a large wetland complex that extends to North Lake, surrounded by a coniferous forest. A sewer line easement crosses this area and was replanted some time ago. South/west of the boat ramp road are portions of several wetlands that appear to collect extra runoff from the roadside ditches associated with the boat ramp road through the winter months. Most of these wetlands are not directly associated with North Lake, but ultimately this whole area drains to North Lake. The sewer line easement continues across this portion of the property as well. Much of the Property is underlain by glacial till. This dense material frequently possesses inclusions consistent with redoximorphic features except they lack the diffuse boundaries characteristic of active wetland hydrology. This material is also very difficult to dig through for complete soil profiling. In addition, a number of non-native species of trees occur along the existing gravel roads, having been planted over the years. Talasaea Consultants performed an initial delineation of on -site wetlands beginning in December 2015. Talasaea re -verified the wetland boundaries in April 2016 as the initial delineations were completed after several atypically high rainfall events. Forty-nine wetlands were identified on the Property. The majority of the wetlands have been reviewed and approved under the Greenline Technology Center BLA and the Greenline Headquarters BLA. Remaining wetlands to be reviewed by the City's consultant are located on the lakeshore properties. Wetland determination data forms and rating forms are separated by BLA, or if they have not been assessed by the City's consultant, to expedite the review process. 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 6 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report North Lake occurs adjacent to the Property. One man-made stream (Stream AC) connects the existing stormwater pond to Weyerhaeuser Pond off -site to the south. Two small swales are located at the south end of the meadow that convey water at the southern side of a utility easement to the roadside swales along S 336th Street, while another constructed swale occurs between Wetlands BB and BD (North). The wetland labels are non -sequential as the wetlands were delineated as part of a larger effort. A complete table outlining the wetland classification, size, and other information of all the wetlands can be found in Appendix D. Photographs of typical conditions within the wetlands, including typical uplands and access roads, are included within Appendix E. Wetlands outside of the Shoreline Management Zone (SMZ) have been rated using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication # 14-06-029). Wetlands occurring within the SMZ along North Lake were rated using the rating system outlined in the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 15.10 Critical Areas. 4.2.1 Parcel F Parcel F contains all or part of 12 wetlands. Wetland BD (North) and Wetland CD are located along North Lake. These wetlands are dominated by forested and scrub -shrub canopy, primarily red alder (Alnus rubra) and salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis). The remainder of the wetlands are not hydrologically supported by North Lake, rather, by precipitation and shallow groundwater. 4.2.2 Parcel J Parcel J contains portions of three (3) wetlands, which occur on all three lakeshore parcels. 4.2.3 Parcel L Parcel L contains two (2) wetlands, one of which is BD (North), described above. The other wetland is classified as palustrine forested and scrub -shrub sloped wetland. 4.2.4 Parcel BLA 2-3 Parcel BLA 2-3 contains 27 wetlands located either along North Lake, around the former Weyerhaeuser Tech Center, or in the meadow. Wetlands located along North Lake have been previously described in either Parcel L or Parcel F. Wetlands located west of the Tech Center in the forest are mostly palustrine forested or scrub -shrub, and are supported by precipitation and surface water flows. Wetlands located southwest of the Tech Center are supported by an existing stormwater retention pond, which also provides hydrology for Stream AC. The remaining wetlands are located in the meadow adjacent to Interstate 5. The meadow is heavily maintained and currently dominated by pasture grasses including fescues (Festuca spp.), bentgrasses (Agrostis spp.), velvet grass (Holcus lanatus), sweet vernal grass (Anthoxanthum odoratum), and others. 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 7 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report 4.2.5 Parcel BLA 3-1 Parcel BLA 3-1 contains 12 wetlands, which are located in the southern part of the meadow adjacent to Parcel BLA 2-3. Wetlands located in this parcel are palustrine emergent and classified as slope wetlands. 4.3 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Streams and Other Features North Lake, one (1) stream, and three (3) constructed and maintained swales all occur within the Property. The eastern section of the Property is adjacent to North Lake. North Lake is located within the Shoreline Management Zone, which is outlined in Chapter 6. 4.3.1 North Lake North Lake is a Shoreline of the State and is located adjacent to the northeast parcels within the Property. This 50-acre lake is periodically stocked with rainbow trout by WDFW, and has a resident largemouth bass population that is maintained for fishing. While no motorized boats are allowed on this lake, there is a dock at the north end at the WDFW maintained access point. 4.3.2 Stream AC A stormwater pond for the Tech Center collects runoff from approximately 2/3 of the greater Tech Center property. This stormwater pond conveys the treated water downstream through a man-made channel (Stream AC) that extends into the Property before flowing south under South 336th Street to its confluence with Stream HA. The combined streams flow for approximately 600 feet before entering Weyerhaeuser Pond. Weyerhaeuser Pond then discharges south through a structure into a buried pipe that is located underneath the Headquarters building. The flows from this series of streams ultimately enter the Hylebos Creek some two (2) miles south of the Property. This conveyance feature, identified as Stream AC for the purposes of this report, has not been maintained over the years and has become more naturalized, despite the primary source of flow being the stormwater pond discharge. Stream AC starts at the stormwater pond outlet, but also collects water from the adjacent wetlands and uplands. The flow regime of this stream is directly tied to the discharges from the stormwater pond more so than the other hydrologic inputs. While this feature was artificially created, its connection to fish -bearing waters and naturalization over time ensures that this feature has at least the potential to sustain fish habitat. 4.3.3 Non -regulated Swales Several swales have been constructed and are actively maintained across the Property that tie into natural features. A pair of swales (AT1 and AT2) convey water from the sewer line easement north of South 336th Street south to a culvert under South 336th Street, before discharging these waters into Weyerhaeuser Pond. Ditch BC conveys water from Wetland BB to Wetland BD (North) in the lakefront properties. 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 8 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report CHAPTER 5.WILDLIFE AND LISTED SPECIES 5.1 Wildlife Surveys and Assessments The Property was evaluated for wildlife habitat and observations of wildlife were recorded during all field visits since December 2015. The general habitat on -site is a blend of small depressional wetlands, 3rd growth Douglas fir forest with a patchy salal/sword fern understory, and a mixed deciduous forest with a primarily salmonberry understory. An existing stormwater pond occurs adjacent to several wetlands near the west side of the Property, and a naturalized stream originating from the stormwater pond discharge also occurs on -site. North Lake occurs adjacent to the eastern most portion of the project area. No unique habitats occur on -site. Both North Lake and Stream AC have potential habitat for salmonids and other freshwater fish, though no occurrences have been documented. Both features provide fish habitat at a minimum. Though no fish of any species were observed within Stream AC, North Lake is regularly stocked with rainbow trout, and presumably has many other fish species present. Listed species evaluated for effects include the listed salmonids (Chinook salmon, steelhead, and bull trout) to address the potential for downstream water quality impacts. General wildlife observations during field work include: American Robin, Pacific Wren, Canada Goose, Chickadee, Ruby -crowned Kinglet, Red -winged Blackbird, Pileated Woodpecker, Bufflehead, Mallard, American Widgeon, American Crow, American Coot, Pied -billed Grebe, Rufous Hummingbird, mountain beaver (burrows), rabbit, deer, coyote, and bullfrogs. 5.2 Listed Species There are no known listed species occurring on or adjacent to the Property. Listed species (salmonids) do occur downstream in Hylebos Creek. Any stormwater discharges would be treated sufficient to meet or exceed the current Department of Ecology standards prior to being discharged into North Lake or into downstream waterbodies. North Lake is stocked with rainbow trout. Weyerhaeuser Pond off -site to the south of the Property may also be used by bald eagles for foraging, but this pond has previously been recognized as a large stormwater facility that acts as detention and treatment. Salmonids have not been observed in any of the streams, lake, or pond within the greater Federal Way Campus, LLC property. The apparent hindrances restricting salmonid migration into this area appear to be several not -fish -accessible culverts downstream. There is also a long stretch of pipe (roughly 1,600 linear feet) from the Weyerhaeuser pond, under the Headquarters Building, to its outlet just north of Highway 18, that is likely problematic for fish passage. The potential for federally or state listed species occurring within the Property is very low. North Lake and the associated streams have the capacity for salmonids to occur, though accessibility from Hylebos Creek is artificially restricted. North Lake is stocked with rainbow trout, at a minimum. While no salmon species have been observed within North Lake or associated streams that does not preclude the potential for their presence. No impacts within the ordinary high water mark for any stream or lake is proposed as part of this project, though maintenance of an existing stormwater structure 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 9 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report will be necessary. All stormwater will be treated prior to discharge and conveyance into a fish -bearing water. CHAPTER 6. REGULATORY REVIEW 6.1 Shoreline Management Zone (SMZ) North Lake is listed as a Shoreline of the State, and as such, the adjacent areas are located within the SMZ for the Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way. Shorelands extend for 200 feet from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) for North Lake and include Wetland BD North as well as other wetlands that occur within the shorelands. In addition to a 50-foot lakeshore buffer, these areas along the shoreline of North Lake have extra protections under the SMZ, which require additional coordination for any modifications within this area. Wetlands identified within the Shoreline Management Zone are rated under FWRC 15.10.250. Instead of a formal rating system, wetlands must meet certain criteria to be classified as either a Category I, Category 11, or Category III wetland (Table 1). Table 1. FWRC Wetland Buffer Requirements in SMZ (FWRC 15.10.250) Wetland Category Wetland Buffer Width Category 1 200 feet Category II 100 feet Category III: >10,00o sf 50 feet Cate o III: 2,500-10,000 sf 25 feet Category III: <2,500 sf 0 feet See Appendix D for wetland rating, category, and standard buffer. 6.2 Non-SMZ Wetlands Wetlands occurring outside of the SMZ in Federal Way are currently regulated under FWRC 19.145.420. Wetlands regulated under Chapter 19 of the FWRC were rated using the Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington (2014). The ratings for wetlands determine the appropriate buffer width requirements as specified in the Federal Way Revised Code. Wetland ratings and rating figures can be found in Appendix A2, 132, and C2 for wetlands within the Tech Center BLA, Headquarter BLA, and remaining wetlands to be reviewed, respectively. Wetlands identified within the Property, but outside of the SMZ, typically rated as a Category III or IV with Habitat Scores ranging from three (3) to six (6). One wetland rated as a Category II, and no wetlands rated as Category I. Wetland setbacks in the FWRC are determined first by Category and then by Habitat Score (Table 2). 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 10 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report Table 2. FWRC Wetland Buffer Reauirements Outside of SMZ (FWRC 19.145.420) Wetland Category Wetland Buffer Width based on Habitat Score 3-4 5 6-7 8-9 Category I: Bogs and wetlands of high conservation value 190 feet 190 feet 190 feet 225 feet Category I: Forested and based on function score 75 feet 105 feet 165 feet 225 feet Category II 75 feet 105 feet 165 feet 225 feet Category III 60 feet 105 feet 165 feet 225 feet Category IV 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet See Appendix D for wetland rating, category, and standard buffer. 6.3 Streams Type F streams under FWRC 19.145.270 require a 100-foot standard buffer. Regulated lakes not identified as a Shoreline of the State (i.e. Weyerhaeuser Pond) require a standard 25-foot buffer under FWRC 19.145.350. Non -regulated drainage features that do not meet the definition of a stream have no associated buffers. CHAPTER 7. SUMMARY The Federal Way Campus, LLC Property is an approximately 74-acre assemblage of five (5) parcels located within the City of Federal Way in King County, Washington. The stormwater pond for the (former) Weyerhaeuser Tech Center occurs within the Property, along with a vacant single family residence, existing gravel roads, and trails for passive recreation. Portions of 49 wetlands on -site, three (3) wetlands off -site, one stream, and North Lake were identified on or adjacent to the Property. North Lake occurs adjacent to the Property, while one (1) stream and three (3) man-made swales occur within the Property. 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 11 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) CHAPTER 8. REFERENCES Existing Conditions Report Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. FWSOBS-70/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Hitchcock, C.L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. 730 pp. Hru by, T. 2014. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. 2014 Update. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication # 14-06-029. Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X. Munsell Color. 1988. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, Maryland. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/. Accessed [January 2018]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. Wetland Regulatory Assistance Program. ERDC/EL TR-10-3. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1989. National Wetlands Inventory Map, Poverty Bay Quadrangle. Washington State Department of Ecology. March 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual. Washington State Department of Ecology. Water Quality Assessment and 303(d) List. 2017. www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/303d (accessed January 2018). Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife [Map Online], Olympia (WA): SalmonScape [January 2018]. URL: <http//wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/index.html> Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2016. Priority Habitats and Species Database [online], Olympia, WA. [accessed January 2018]. <www.wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/> 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Page 12 l l l Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 Existing Conditions FIGURES Figure 1 — Vicinity Map and Driving Directions Figure 2 — Property Parcel Map 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx FIGURES SEGTIONS 15ff 16, TOWNSHIF 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. "r• `,39Uh Sr The Commons PROJECT AREA At Federal Way S9 ei'ebration Park S; 13111 s, v n X 5 36t , Si '6 5 n KITTS CORNER o-. T n c� a 34811'� 5t 30 CD S 347nd S, Q Pacific Bonsai Museum S 344th St A. T r S N a' b rt A aatsts; DRIVING DIREGTIONS: I. FROM DOWNTOWN SEATTLE TAKE 1-5 SOUTH FOR 10.5 MILES. 2. USE THE 2ND LANE FROM THE RIGHT TO TAKE EXIT 143 FOR 5 520TH 5T TOWARD FEDERAL WAY 3. TAKE A SHARP LEFT ONTO 5 520TH ST. 4. IN 0.5 MILES TURN RIGHT ONTO WEYERHAEUSER WAY 5 5. YOUR DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT. NORTH SCALE: NT5 FIGURE TITLE DRAWN TAL# VIGINITY MAP B DRIVING DIREGTION5 MW/KM Ir TALASAEA REFERENCE APPLICANT LAT. & LONG. FEDERAL NAY GAMPU5, LLG 4-1.30-70-71-122.2g188q CONSULTANTS, INC. PROPOSED PROJECT: LAKEFRONT BLA DATE REVISED Resource & Environmental Planning PURPOSE: EXISTING GONDITION5 1-&-201& 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast ADDRESS: 32820 32ND AVENUE 5, gbOO1 FIGURE Woodinville, Washington 98077 Bus (425)661-7550 — Fax (425)661-7549 CITY COUNTY STATE IN L FEDERAL WAY KING HA UNNAMED WETLANDS \DRAWING/I500-1599/TAL1572/1672 (LS BLA)/P1ans/TAL-1572 Lakefront BLA Figu*iCc@�fY&U-001heflea Consultants, INC. SEGTIONS I5616, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. kp ■ r � 1 l i r i • PARCEL FOle ; r _ � • r r r`` Ix � � I '■ " � 14 a � \ r I 1 - e - - ' PARCEL BLA2-3 , 11' r PARGEL � r t� - � ti NORTH LAKE PARCEL J r rJ 1' - PARCEL L �0 PLAN LEGEND \. �� G❑ � � t �� � � PRO.JEGT AREA .1 .�' ..�. / —PROPERTY LINE -11 /f --- 11 :;: = EXISTING MICTLAND ---------NORTH LAKE - OHW i• i II I I, !" 1 1•� rnV{ � — STREAM GENTERuNE EXISTING GONTOW ORAFHIG SG L NORTH IN FEET ) NOTE5: 1 I. ONLY FEATURE5 LOGATED IN THE PROJECT AREA [] 20 500 IOO❑ OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PARGEL BOUNDARIE5 ARE SHOWN. SCALE: 1 =500 TALASAEA DCONSULTANTS, INC. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast Woodinville, Washington 98077 Bus (425)861-7550 — Fax (425)861-7549 ` FIGURE TITLE PARGEL MAP DRAWN MW/KM TAL# 1572 REFERENCE APPLICANT FEDERAL WAY GAMPU5, LLG LAT. & LONG. 47.30-1071,-122.2g1889 PROPOSED PROJECT: LAKEFRONT BLA DATE 1-8-200 REVISED PURPOSE: EXISTING GONDITIONS ADDRESS: 32&20 32ND AVENUE 5, 98001 FIGURE # CITY EEt]1 RAL 14AY 1COUNTY STATE KING WA IN UNNAMED WETLANDS Z:\DRAWING'1500-1599\'1'AL1a72\157L [LS 1SLA)\F1an8\-l'AL-10-Yc LauelronL t]LA ragi>vsapraER--VO)Htwacu �.V[sau��a — Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) APPENDIX A Existing Conditions GREENLINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL, DATED 27 OCTOBER 2017 (PERMIT NO. 17-100455-00-SU) 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix A CITY OF CITY ue HALL �. Federal y tr r 33'�5 , W Avenue Sough W Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 VY14�4'• Cit1i7�eC18%afrNa}! C0/11 Jim Ferrell, AAayor Mr. uric LnBrie October 27, 2017 GSNI Consulting 1 ngince•rs LLC 33100 811, Avenue South, Suite 2i15 Federal \Vav, \X7A 9S()t13 cricJahi'11EC1'.C�>mriril.rur�Y Re: File #17-100455-SU; BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTIIILNT APPROVAL Greenline Technology Center BLA, 32901 Vleyerhaeuser Wav South, Federal Waw Dear 1\11. LaBrie: '11le City of Federal \VaN. has completed an administrative review crf the above -referenced Boundary Line ;Adjustment (BLA) application. 'file Department of Community Dcvvlopment hereby approves rile BI—,\ with conditions based on the sinvey drawing prepared by I-SM, resubmitted oil October 24. 2017. BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to alter the interior lot lines between three lots in the Corporate Park-1 (CI1-1) zone. E sting Lot G is -18.01 acres in sire, Lot 1-1 is appruximately 55 acres, and Lot I is 2.41 acres. Proposed Lot 1 j will be 48.12 acres, Lot 2 will be 30.21 acres, and Lor 3 vih be ipproximateli 26,2 acres. The existing iGreenline Tochnologi- Center and its associated parking lots will be located on proposed Lot 1. d J DECISIONAL CRITERIA Cin• staff has determined the BLA mects declSicliial criteria set forth in Valel-al II'up Reiii.s'ed Code (I'V11C) Chapter lb.lU: The BLA is a minor alteration in the locadon of lot boundaries on existing lots. The BLA N vill not increase the number of lots, nor d ntinish the size of open space or other protected environments, _\ critical areas report and subsequent resubmittals were provided by the applicant, "Lsisting Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels G, 11. & I)," by Talasaea (March 29, 2017, revised September 1. 2017 %vith October 23, 2017, addendum). The materials were peer reviewed by the city's consultant, ESA. ']"lie wetland delineations, ratings, and buffers have been reviewed and are shown on the 111.A drawing. 2. The BLA will not diminish the size (-)fail)? lot so as to result in a lot of less square footage than prescribed in the CP-I zoning district. 'fhe 1994• Concomitant "Zoning Agreement (CZA) for the subject property does not contain a prescriptive n-tinilnum lot Sire for the CP-1 zone. 3. The BLA will not result in the reducton of setbacks or lot coverage to less than prescribed by- the CP- I zoning district. In the CZ_\ no setbacks are specified for the CP-I zone, except for the continuous Managed Forest Buffer to be provided around the entire perimeter, of the CP-1 pruperiy, which is unaffected by the 131—\. The CZ.\ contains a lug coverage standard o170 percent of the total CP-1 zoned property, which is unaffected by the BLA as all the three parcels are all zoned CP-1. 4. All lntS resulting; frcnn the BL:\ will be in conformance with the designs standards of the city's subdivision title. Lot 3 will remain bisected by \Veyerhaeuser %VaN, South; unchanged as a result of the BLA. \li, Laic Lal3rie Page 2 of 2 October 2", 201- 5. The southern portion of Lot 3 cannot access Wetrerhaeuser \\'try and meet the 150-foot drit,cw lv spacing standard. To avoid a nonconi-Orminp drivevmt ;cparauon, an access and utility e:isemcnl will be recorded across proposed ],or 1 in favor of proposed Lot 3 to allow use of the existing private loop road. CONDITION OF APPROVAL 1. Make the following corrections to the drawing: a. On Sheet 3, amend Note #3 to include the report addendum dated Ocrober 23, 2017. b. On Sheet'+, correct the labels for Wedmd DID, which should be Dj, and Welland AX, which should be AV c- On Slicet 1 O, correct the label for \\'etland PQ, wlucli should be PG (]3l). RECORDING Pursmant to l=\\-'RC 18.10.060, all boundary line adjustments shall be recorded ,yith the Bing Count), Division of Elections and Records. To finalize the BLA process, please use the enclosed Rejwbn1i11a11gjonna110n foi7n and submit to the Permit Center one signed and notarized drawing (mylar or paper) and one paper copy of the sibnicd/aotarized drawing for city signatures. Plew-P uo1r. Per state law, on the drawing all signatures nncl wriung shall be made with permanent black ink, including notary stamps. '111c applicant will record the Bluer\. Please return one conformed copy to the cite immediately al to recording. No changes to the BL.1 document are allowed following city signature (with the ezcepuon of wilting in the casement recording number to the placeholders on Sheets ) and 10), If the cpunhV recording process necessitates revisions to the BLA snap, you must request and receive approval of any change from city staff p6or to recording. The applicant trust also record the access easement prior to or at the satne tune of recording the Bf—N and return a recorded cope to the cih,. CLOSING The 131-A is hereby ,it Troved with the condtton as detailed above. 1"his land use decision does tint tit give compliance with ruture City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development If you have army questions regarding this decision, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634. or sill] eeNr_welshdr ciwoffederalway.com. Sincerely. l� 5 Brian Davis Cormmuniq Development l>trectur vnr: Approved Rl_1 Drm x-mg (resubmiucd 10-24-1 +) lksubmi`t,d I-urm c- Slacuy welsh, Senirrr flintier Ami Dowcr, Nenior Ftigmecring flan, Hcviewcr link hrestrnt, ticnipr Traffic I mgmucr Brian Asbury, E-alwhaven \Mitcr Lt Scwcr District Tum Messmer, .014.0all 0- U, "ime l l l l l l 1 1 I I Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) APPENDIX Al GREENLINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER BLA, WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2015 - 2017 Conditions Report 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix Al WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal W—ay/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federall Way Campus LLC State: WA Sampling Point: AV-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21 N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.306750 Long:-122298169 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood -gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: Located uphill from wetland VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Acer macrophyllum 40 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Populus tremuloides 35 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 75 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: j_§fjt 1. Rubus spectabilis 45 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus armeniacus 25 Y FAC Total % Cover of: MUltiDly by: 3. Oemleria cerasiformis 10 N FACU OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 80 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: M UPL species x 5 = 1. Dicentra forrnosa 20 Y FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 20 = Total Cover Woody Vin Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1 None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 80 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No E US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: AV-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features incheo Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-10 10YR 2/2 100 Loam 10-16 10YR 3/2 100 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linina. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: No redox features present HYDROLOGY Primary Indicators (minimum of one reouired: check ail that a ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indicators (2 or more reouired) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 16 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Record rainfall in recent months. Saturation occurred below 12" depth. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weverhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/KingWay/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federall Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: AV-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21 N. 124E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial Till Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave depression Slope (%): <1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.306750 Long:-122.298169 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing Sa piing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Wetland is a disturbed area flanked by roads on 3 sides which has slowed drainage of the area. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) °% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 70 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Populus tremuloides 20 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 50 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species 100 x 3 = 300 50 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Flerb Stratum (Plot size: §ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. None Column Totals: 100 (A) 300 (B) 2. 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ® Dominance Testis >50% 6 ® Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 =Total Cover W_oodv Mina Stratum (Plot size: j.Lft) 1. Atone 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: AV-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-13 10YR 2/1 100 silty loam OM present 13-16 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/8 20 C M Silt Prominent 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ® Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: OM present in upper horizon but insufficient qualities to be muck. Carbon content doesn't feel high enough -no organic carbon testing done. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (84) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 4 Secondary Indicators (2 or more reguired) ® Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (132) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) l Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: BD-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM, DRT Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21 NT R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308979 Long:-122.290309 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Aldenaood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site rnap showing sa Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. nt locations, transects, important features, etc. Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Slraturn (Plot size: 2Lft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 40 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Acer crrclnatom 35 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. Popu/us barsarridera 20 No FAC Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Pseudotsuga menziesii 5 No FACU Percent of Dominant Species 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1 !None Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 0 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: §ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Po/ystichum munitum 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Lamiastrum galeobdolon 1 No NL 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 21 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. Rubus armeniacus 30 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Rubus laclnia[us 5 No FACU 35 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 79 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BD-UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (178) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): _ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Impossible to dig - extremely compact and suspected old logging road HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired: check all that aDDly) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Record rainfall in recent months. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WayiKing Sampling Date:1211912015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: BD-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM, DRT Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1-3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308804 Long:-122.28969 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site reap showing sam Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft 1. Fraxinus /alifoli'a 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: j5ft 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. Polystichum munitum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: jLft) 1. Rubus armeniacus 2. locations, transects, ImprcRdrir rPaurrVa, VLL. Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 65 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 65 = Total Cover 60 Yes FAC 60 = Total Cover 15 Yes FACU 15 = Total Cover 2 Yes FAC 2 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 85 % Cover of Biotic Crust Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) Prevalonca Index works hoot: Total % Cover of Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 65 x 2 = 130 FAC species 62 x 3 = 10 FACU species 15 x 4 = 60 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 142 (A) 376 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.64 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ® Prevalence Index is <-3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast- Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BD -WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvve' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 2/2 100 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Structure obliterated because of surrounding ponded water. Difficult to describe but assumed hydric from hydrologic indicators. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required; check all that a I ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more reouired) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (132) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1-2 Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1-2 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Record rainfall in recent months. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal Way/King County Sampling Date:1211912015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: BL-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM DRT Section, Township, Range: S16T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2-3% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.305868 Long:-122.292171 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam 0-8% slojpes NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Data point representative of Wetland BL, BE, and BK. All similarwetlands adjacent to North Lake. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. Alnus rubs 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Rubus speclabi/is 2. Sambucus racemosa 3. Oemleria cerasiformis 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size:, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Absolute Dominant Indicator D o min a n ce Test works heet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 35 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 35 = Total Cover 15 Y FAC 10 Y FACU 2 N FACU 27 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 1. Rubus armeniacus 45 Y FACU 2. Rubus ursinus 20 Y FACU 65 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 50 x 3 = 150 FACU species 77 x 4 = 308 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 127 (A) 458 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.61 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BE-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/1 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches). Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) _ ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches): 7 Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Test pit very close to the lake which is at high water mark, higher elevation levels than usual US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal Wav/Kinq County Sampling Date:1211912015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Wav Cam pus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: BL-WET1 Investigator(s). JMM. DRT Section, Township, Range: S16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2-3% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.305787 Long-122.292462 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel Sandy loam. 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing Sam Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Remarks: Data point representati Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Aland BL, BE, and BK. All similar VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 1. Popu/us balsamifera 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Spiraea douglasii 2. Thuja plicafa 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. Polystichum munitum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. nt locations. transects. Important Teatures, etc. Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ vetlands adiacent to North Lake. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 60 Y FAG That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 60 = Total Cover 45 Y FACW 2 N FAC 47 = Total Cover 1 Y FACU 1 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 1. Rubus armeniacus 2 Y FACU 2. Rubus ursinus 1 Y FACU 3 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 45 x 2 = 90 FAC species 62 x 3 = 186 FACU species 4 x 4 = 16 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 111 (A) 292 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.63 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ® Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BL-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 4/2 100 6+ Hard gravel 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: 0-6 inches, some redox but with surface saturation the sample liquified immediately. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reguE_redLcheck all that apply) _ Secondary Indicators (2 or mare required? ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/Kina Sampling Date:7119/2016 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Gam us LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DE-UPL1 Investigator(s): Jennifer Marriott Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21 N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): c nave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308117 Long:-122.297907 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft 1. Populus tremuloides 2. 3. 4. SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Populus IremuloJdes 2. Gaultheria shallon 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 0 1. Polystichum munitum 2. Rubus ursinus 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Straturn (Plot size: jiff 1. None 2. nt Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E eic. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 40 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 40 = Total Cover 30 Y FACU 25 Y FACU 55 = Total Cover 5 N FACU 70 Y FACU 75 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 25 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DE-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 1-16 10YR 3/3 100 loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): 1 Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: No hydric soil indicators identified HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indicators (2 a more required( ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (132) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/KingWay/King Sampling Date:711912016 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LI_C State: WA Sampling Point: DE-WET1 Investigator(s): Jennifer Marriott Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21 N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till Main Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308117 Long:-122.297907 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood _gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showi Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: This atypical Wetland occurs within a broad area where through the trees. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft 1. Populus balsamifera 2. Fraxinus excelsior 3. 4. SaplingfShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Fraxinus excelsior 2. Rubus spectabilis 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vi a Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. None 2. nt locations, transacts, Important• reazures, etc. Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ the delineation includes area of upland as the wetland Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 30 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 60 Y NL Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) 80 Y NL Prevalencelndexworkshoot: 20 Y FAC Total % Cover of: IJtui I hl h OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species 50 x 3 = 150 100 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 =, Column Totals: 50 (A) 150 (B) 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Fraxinus excelsior (European ash) is considered to be a wetland hydrophytic vegetation. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3_0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ® Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ® Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ We can safely assume this test plot represents US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DE -WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 Silty loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Soil was very dry, hardpan at 12 inches. Soil is assumed to be hydric based on hydrology and hydrophytic plants. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re uired check all that a I ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ® Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: I Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring Remarks: Surface ponding and saturation within the upper our evaluation in April 2016. Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ I photos, previous inspections), if available. was previously noted in January 2016 though wetland hydrology was not present at US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Vlleyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wa /Kin Sampling Date:418116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: I NA. Sampling Point: DH UPL 1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21 N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): gentle slope Slope (%): 3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.307786 Long:-122.297435 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sand_ loam. 0 to 8 crcenl slo es NWI classification None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Statt m (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status 1. Thuja plicata 30 Yes FAC 2. Acer macrophyllum 40 Yes FACU 3. Psuedotsuaa menziesii 30 Yes FACU 4. 100 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. Rubus armeniacus 30 Yes FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 30 = Total Cover Herb Siratum (Plot size: 1. Rubus ursinus 20 Yes FACU 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 20 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 80 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A) 5 (B) 40 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by- OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DH UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features _(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-9 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam 9-16 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy loam gravelly 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that aoDly) _ ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indicalors (2 or more required) I ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County'. Federal Way/King Sampling Date:4/8116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DH-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21 N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain _ Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.307786 Long:-122297435 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sangy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation no, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft 1. None 2. 3. 4. SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15f 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. Carex deweyana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Straturn (Plot size: 151) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 0 = Total Cover 30 Y FAC 30 = Total Cover 15 Y FAC 15 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 85 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover ot: Multiply py: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DH-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches] Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvi)e' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-i Duff 1-11 10YR 2/1 100 Muck 11-16 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary_ Indlcators_(minfmum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 9 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous ins Remarks: Secondary Indicators (2 or more mmdred) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WaylKing Sampling Date:4/8/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DI UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21 N. RAE Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): gentle slope_ Slope (%): 3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 43.307767 Long:-122.297341 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing samplin pint locations, transacts, im octant reatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® 1 Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test wo rks heet: Tree Stralum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Thuja plicala 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Acer macrophyllum 40 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Psuedotsuga menziesii 30 Yes FACU Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) a tin /Shrub Straturn (Plot size: 15ft 1. Rubus armeniacus 30 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheets 2 Total % Cover of: Multi by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 30 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: M UPL species x 5 = 1. Rubus ursinus 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 5 ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 20 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 80 itter % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ❑ No E US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast- Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DI-UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features [inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-9 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam 9-16 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy loam -gravelly 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: No hydric soil indicators HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary -Indicators minimum of one required* check all that a Iv ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more reuuired) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No wetland hvdrolaov indicators identified US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WayKing Sampling Date:418116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC _ State: WA Sampling Point: Di•WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 43.307767 Long:-122.297341 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Strattim (Plot size: 30ft 1. None 2. 3. 4. SaolinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. Rubus speclabills 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. Carex deweyana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stra m (Plot size: j.Lft) 1. Nana 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 0 = Total Cover 30 Y FAC 30 = Total Cover 15 Y FAC 15 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 85 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of M Itit* by; OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DI-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-11 10YR 2/1 100 Muck 11-16 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired: check all that apply) _ Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 46)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches): 9 Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 n WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal W L/Kino Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DJ-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.307429 Long:-122,297907 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ED Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks: Soils graded at somepoint in the past. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. locations, transects, important features, etc. Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ED Absolute Dominant Indicator I Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) °I Cover Species'? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Abies gran dis 40 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 2. Fraxinus excelsior 40 Yes NL Total Number of Dominant 3. Acer macrophyllum 20 Yes FACU Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. Oem/eria cerasiformis 20 Yes FACU Prevalence Indexworksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply b 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 20 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ftUPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Dicentra Formosa 30 Yes FACU 3. Rubus ursinus 20 Yes FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 5 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 70 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: j.Lft) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1. Non be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: F. excelsior (European ash) is not listed in the US, but it is recognized as a wetland tree in its home territory US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DJ-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (n)ni&S) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 3/3 100 Gravelly loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: No hydric soil indicators HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired: check all that aoolv) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators 42 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No wetland hydrology indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/KinWayJKino Sampling Date:4/6/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. I.I.0 State: WA Sampling Point: DJ-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.307429 Long:-122.297907 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood graveliv saridy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology NO naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important Teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ f;ernarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 29ft) Io Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Populus balsamilera 50 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Fraxinus excelsior 50 Yes NL Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B) SaplinalShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. None Prevalence Indexworksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 0 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: §ft) UPL species x 5 = 1.Carexdeweyana 10 Yes FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ® Dominance Testis >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 10 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 90 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: F. excelsior (European ash) is recognized as a wetland tree In its home territory. It is not listed in the US. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DJ-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/2 100 Mucky loam 8-12 10YR 2/1 100 Mucky loam 12-16 10YR 6/2 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Gravel sand Redox features prominent 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ® Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) _ Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 46)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Depth (inches): 5 Saturation Present? Yes H No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 APPENDIX A2 Existing Conditions Report GREENLINE TECHONOLOGY CENTER BLA, WETLAND RATING FORMS WITH FIGURES, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2017 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix A2 Wetland name or number _&,11A r- /*g RATING SUMMARY -- Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #-i #):Af- �, �' f� '7� Date of site visit:���b Rated by f _ Trained by Ecology?* Yes No Date of trainingAs HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?�Y N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 11�- (based on functions-� or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score =16 -19 Category IV — Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the apprapriote raiill Site Potential H �M L H L H L Landscape Potential H L H L H M ,1L Value M L H L L Score Based on Ratings TOTAL F 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal III III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H, M,L 6 = M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4=M,L,L 3 = L,L,L 1 Wetland name or numberf�/f�(� DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions td improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to Improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland Is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch, points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface (or duff Iayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 (� D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent nfant_s (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y of area points = 3 `� Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1110 of area points =1 •J Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal poncling or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > A total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > X total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < / total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 4_6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 I D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 iv D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 ( J D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points In the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 or 4 = H 2�, 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? ; �, `?. Yes = 2 No = 0 ,L Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:42-4 = H _1= M 0 = L Wetland Ratting System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number -4-q-1 " F I f 'A DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functiorlis ; Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation 0 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an Intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. gg2L1lnf ss nrage during, wet�eriod_ s; Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland Is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft l6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is SO to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential It score i5:__lZ-lb = M _,C�b-ll = M _U-S = L nrwru Me JULn'y ." u—j"', F. Y+ 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 ` D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 01 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = m v 1 or L = M _U = L rrrcur u inr I uuny un u'c j..x V-!Jy 7— D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscal2e that has f loading problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose fire lrinitesr snare i rrtore than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been Identified as important forflood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score Is: 2-4 = H �" z = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 6 Wetland name or number f /Xtr (wf' HABITAT FUNCTIONS These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0, Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? ' H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. tip to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Mac or more than 10% of the unit if it Is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. quatw bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 YI mergent 3 structures: points = 2 crub-shrub (areas where shrubs have > .309E cover) 2 structures: points = 1 �Q Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) J�,4� ,�1 structure: points = 0 10 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• '1 The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperlods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see textfor descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 _Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river In, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points iFreshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 W. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple laosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 _ < 5 species 1:oints = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is ah'vo; s high. None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams 4 in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Norm — Effective January 1, 2015 13 Wetland name or number A±/4T Ift-If- H 1.5. Special habitat features: Ch ck the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 It long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of srrn[nJ — Total for H 1 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H = '-14 = M l_�c-G = L Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetiond unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_, _ % if total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon 20-33% of 1 km Polygon 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 3 points = 2 2 , points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 4 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/Z]_= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Poiytsn« points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) r CL <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _4-6 = H _2-3 = M < 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, In a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed an next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet avy of the criteria above _ _ _ _ points = 0 1 Mating of Value If score is: _2 = H i;'• 1 = M —_0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form —Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number M/4"Pf >f}- WDFW Priority Habitats h'r•l+u•ity halilrrts lisy{t h�v WDPW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. Iiql;Ii://wtll%v.%v,I.g��rntalii:itipuss/(]++ L+ _.._tlt)U(it [�:,._�zal! or access the list from here: will:/ //wdlty.t+yi+elyle'rrn+er'+:ttin+sltslfslllstl) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiverslty Areas and Corridors; Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and (orbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: JILd -g- u)%y[ji k est �q Cascade crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or;, 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak 0n+s $)(ment is important (full descriptions in 1,VDFW PllSreportp. 158 -see web link above). Ripa Han: The area adjacent to Mlttatic systems with 11owing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link an previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6-5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number_&Z RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): (�(,i Nam. r�Y 1S 7- Date of site visit: t S Rated by MVUW Gam' Trained by Ecology?_ Yes No Date of training( HGM Class used for rating &XR&M Mgd Wetland has multiple HGM classes?x V. N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY JL (l),isCId Intl fLJ11C0nnti_k or special charac[eristics } 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category 1—Total score = 23 - 27 Score for each Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 function based Category III — Total score =16 -19 on three ratings Category IV —Total score = 9 -15 (order of ratings is not _ FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat important) Water Quality 9 = H,H,H Circle the appropriate ratings g = H,H,M 'Site Potential H L H L J H (� 7= H,H,L Landscape Potential H t. H j� H 7 = H,M,M Value M L H L H TOTAL 6= H,M,L _ _ 6 = M,M,M :Score Based on ]. �y 5 = H,L,L iRatings _ -I _ 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY I II I Estuarine Wetland of High Conservation Value cog i Mature Forest 1 Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I lI Interdunal [ II III 1V None of the above �- Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A& DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water,Quality Functions - Indicators that the `site functions to improve water quality 1,0, Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet), points = 3 Wetland has an Intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. f points = 2 f Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch, points = 1 D 1 2. The soil 2 in below the surface (ar duff layer] is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes - 4 No = 0 D 1.3, Characteristics and distribution of persislen,-U ianis (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes)? Wetlandyhas persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/i0 of area points = 0 D 1.4. ChavacLes- tins oaf 5e:1sam.al ssondinl! or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > h total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < / total area of wetland points = 0 _ Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No - 0 r D Z.Z. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 CJ D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes = 1 No = 0 C Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 or 4 = H 1 ar z = M �0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0_ Is the water quallty improvement Provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mil to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = o D D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Value If score is:_X2-4 = H _1= M _ 0 = L Wetland bating System for Western W4: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 20 i5 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number DEPRESSIONAL FIND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic (Functions-' : Indicators that the site fund. -ions to reduce flooding and stream degradation w 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4,1. Characteristics of surface water outfio s from the �vetlattti: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points= 0 D 4.2 Dr..,I411 vi stor-1 a furitt LVBC erirufs Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 inj points = 0 D 4 3. Co rttCibution of the EptLind to stowL_ Lii_tha watzrshed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is '10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points= 5 0 { Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page n 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 i D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runotf? Yes = 1 No = 0 d D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at J >1 residence Jac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes= 1 No= 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above �L Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-3 = H 1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page r D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6 1. the rnrir is in a landscape that fyaa flgadin rntflems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. ChooseShe lrisLgst_ score i more Chun-un� coniiitivn is niel.. r The wetland captures surface water thdt would otherwise flow down -gradient Into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e-g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 f 0 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the {l water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why _ points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above t ating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H _ 1 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update b Rating Form - Effective January L, 201 S `J 1 Wetland name or number AL These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? , H 1.1 Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the forested class Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac, Add the number of structures checked, _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present. points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points 1,3, Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do nothave to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfail, reed canarygrass, purple lovsestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudf(ats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you hove four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. COCD (:E) (*) None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points .` Wetland Rating System For Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 20tS Wetland name or number H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, vnsoily deuris within the wetland (> 4 In diameter and 6 ft long). snags (dbh > 4 In) within the wetland _Standing banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) _Undercut over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) f steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree _Stable slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) 1 Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of Straw) i Total For H 1 Add the points in the boxes above, Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H — ._1-14 = M ;c ' 0.6 = L Record the rating on the first page 1 H 2.0, Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: %undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/21_= If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 f 10-19% of 1 km Polygon paints = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2 2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon arou�he wed -and. `nd. O Calculor_^., % undisturbed habitat + [(% moderate and lomi intensity land uses)/21_ = Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10 50%and in 1-3 patches points =2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If �. > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) i <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H 1.3 = M _Y < 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Add the points in the boxes above U - Record the rating on the first page H 3, 1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet .IIly_of rill, r. lwfka above ,ating of Value If score Is:_2 = H 1 = M ,,,'- 0 = L Wetland Elating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Dints = 0 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number WDFW Priority Habitats L'1.L�CLty_11t1111t�L�ll_tj:!Lt IV1 -4V (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. l u' ,�;,;v,llw_t_va•��n � t!, r i '��u:IPVU111 + /wdl>,Ni)tl +� ;- ,, or access the list from here: Lit! 1+ L1 wci I!...ti;i,rr�rnnrrr►.i! i„ts�G,Its/list/) Counr how many ofthe following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) ofthe wetland unit; NOTE: This question is independent ofthe land use between the wetland unit ond the priority habitat — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). -- Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and fnrbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: t) d 1-i a. V ,� ig l 1 cry - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (61 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may he less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west ofthe Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak; Woodland stands of pure oak or oalc/conifer associations where canopy coverage ofthe oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS reportp. 158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS r-eportp. 161 -see web linkabove). lnstream; The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions ofhabitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page), Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 2.5 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus; Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2 0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs_ — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number AT RATING SUMMARY -Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): ACT T/P/ - Date of site visit: Rated by V f Lt. Trained by Ecology?,kYes ❑ No Cate of training �16 HGM Class used for rating �� ���, Wetland has multiple HGM classes? ❑ YesANo NOTE: Form is not complete with out the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 1" (based on functions IFKar special characteristics ❑) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 -19 1!9j Category IV - Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Water Quality I Hydrologic I Habitat List appropriate rating (H, M, L) Site Potential f� Landscape Potential (� Value Total Score Based on Ratings / Lq 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Category Estuarine Wetland of High Conservation Value Bog Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon Interdunal None of the above Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H, H, H S=H,H,M 7=H,H,L 7=H,M,M 6=H,M,L 6=M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5=M,M,L 4=M,L,L 3=L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number AT SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quallty. Functions Iridicatbm that'#ne site functions td Improve. water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1 % slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1 % or less points ='3 Slope is > 1 % - 2% points = 2 Slope is > 2% - 5% points = 1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface (or duff laver) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area i points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area �e�d IM 0 points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > '/z of area points = 2 ` Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points = 1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is: ❑ 12 = H ❑6 -11 = M V0 - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 S 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2.1? _ 1 1 L I Other Sources jba5 �1e�! lA5 Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: i(1 - 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list. Yes =1 No = 0 I S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in (� which the unit is found? Yes = 2 No = 0 1� Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Value If score is: ?1 2 - 4 = H ❑ 1 = M ❑ 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page WSDOT Adapted Form -January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A—L SLOPE WETLANDS Hydrologic;Fur ctiions .Indicators thattne si(e functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually > '/a in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points = 1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is: ❑1 = M-'.0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 ;1 {j Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: Ul = M )y0 = L Recora me raring on me nrsr page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: [ 92 - 4 - H ❑ 1 = M ❑ 0 = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: l S �pr� S �D 'q � a �i Wetland Rating System for Westem WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 7 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number /J-- These questions apply to wetlands 4f all HGM.classes. a HABITAT FUNCTIONS,- Indicators that site functions Jq,provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y4 ac or more than 10 % of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. ❑ Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Vk Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 ❑ Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points -1 ❑ Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: ❑ The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods ). ❑ Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 r — Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 f (g_ 'Saturated only 1 types present: points = 0 • ❑ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland ❑ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland ❑ Lake Fringe wetland 2 points ❑ Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 j 1 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1. 1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. 0 None = 0 points Low = 1 pint Moderate = 2 points I All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3 points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 9 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number AT- -3 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. ❑ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long) ❑ Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland ❑ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) ❑ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) ❑ At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata ) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If Score is: I-115 -18 = H rl 7 -14 = M MO - 6 = L Record the ratina on the naae H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site? H 2.1 Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit) - Calculate: 2 % undisturbed habitat + ( J %moderate &low intensity land uses / 2) _ If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20 - 33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 I 10 - 19% of 1 km Polygon pornts = 1 < 10 % of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat + ( % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) _ Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon eoints = 0 H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (-2) <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If Score is: ❑ 4 - 6 = H ❑ 1 - 3 = M R< 1 = L Record the rating on the fast page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 ❑ It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) ❑ It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) ❑ It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species ❑ It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources ❑ It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) with in 100m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 10 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number 74T_ WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. http://wdfw.we.gov/pu�blications/00165/wdfw00165.pdf or access the list from here: http:llwdfN.we.gov/conseTvation/phs/list! Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. ❑ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha) ❑ Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). ❑ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. ❑ Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-crrowth west of Cascade crest — Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests — Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. ❑ Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 — see web link above). O Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. ❑ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161— see web link above). ❑ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. ❑ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report — see web link on previous page). ❑ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human ❑ Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation: ❑ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. ❑ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 12 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number -6-5141, IA-o RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): iJ�f�L��l D Date of site visit: ��11 i', Rated by �—/V Trained by Ecology? Yes `No Date of training HGM Class used for rating r, I I) l:?P" Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y N f NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY - (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I -Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III -Total score = 16 - 19 X Category IV -Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION f Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality I _ Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H M (L) I H M (f) I H M [� Landscape Potential H N& L H M (�1 / H M L(� Value M L H L H M TOTAL Score Based on Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above X Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings Is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number -Alf 4L J4--b HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? ( go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. N �- go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats .1 your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). 10 - go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a Swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO-goto5 Qq- The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A J 14-1, /4-0 NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number �� /4 L IA-0 SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to irrlprove water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1%slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation forevery 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 Slope is > 2%-5% points =1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff layer] is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 U S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > Y2 of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > Y: of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > X of area points =1 U Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:,12 = H _6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes=1 No= 0 U S 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2.1? Other sources V 0 6 S Yes =1 No = 0 Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_,y 1-2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list. Yes =1 No = 0 S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which unit is found. Yes = 2 No = 0 Z Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Value If score is:�r_2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 11 I Wetland name or number L 1,4-0 SLOPE WETLANDS Hydrologic FMAM= - Indicators that the site Wnctions to reduce flooding aryd stream erosion S 4.0. Does thZ site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually>'/8 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. (] Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1= M -)( 0 = L Hecora me raring on melirsr page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1= M X 0 = L Hecora me raring on me pm page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points =1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? O Yes=2 No=O Total for 5 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H -)1= M _0 = L Hecora me raring on me lirsr page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 n Wetland name or number il} T/f L I Ao These questions apply to wetlands of all HIGM Glasses. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of ', ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = i _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see textfor descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 _Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 ^Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points _Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian mllfoll, reed canarygrass, purple laosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 L) < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams J.�d in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number3`� H I.S. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasorfally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above l Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H 7-14 = M 0.6 = L Record the rating on the rirst page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Pclvi on points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 I Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) — Z 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M �\ < 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above _ _ ooints = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H _1= M ..�0 = L Record the rating on the first page 0 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number��� WDFW Priority Habitats 1'dorbly habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. lllSl jlw dfw.w.i.eovlpublicat7onsl0ii]f>5lwdfw00165_ df or access the list from here: 1�1p,;JJwdftiv.wa.,govJcoiiservalioOJ��hsllistl) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and (orbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: []!c <<aA� h vest cal Cascade c•[-c5g - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including rlprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 J Wetland name or number >q V RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): AV Date of site visit: I// S /1,(-- Rated by J - A461 � _ Trained by Ecology?_ Yes No Date of training -+/) � HGM Class used for rating 7 'Y+rfc.1' Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y x N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAN D CATEGORY � (based on functions X or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I — Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III — Total score =16 -19 Category IV —Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION I Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H M, L H L I H M Landscape Potential H M, L H L1v)• L H M C� Value H. M L H @ L H L TOTAL Score Based on 7 4 (7 Ratings I _ 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal III III IV None of the above 1< Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings Is not important) 9= H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L 1 J Wetland name or number Ak HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? IO - go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. 0- go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). 0- go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. 1Q- go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number /*'I V J \ - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A U DEWSSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff iaverl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 O D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants >'/: of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/lo of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal pending or inundatign: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > X total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > Y total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y. total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above `] Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H Z_6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 p D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 U D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes =1 No = 0 O Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above / Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H X 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 CJ D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Value If score is: x_2-4 = H _1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number tq V DEPRESSI.ONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing paints = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itse f The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 30 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H X 6.11 = M _O-S = L Record the rating on me prsr page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 I D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 U D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above "7- Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H X 1 or 2 = M _ _O = L Recora the rating on me rirsr page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more thon one condition is me:. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H f 1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y. ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• A The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 k Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 _Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian milfoll, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. 0 a None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row r are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 71 V H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. X Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X at of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) X Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polvenn points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity Total for H 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-4-6 = H _1-3 = M _< 1= L points = 2 points =1 points = 0 points = (- 2) points = 0 Add the points in the boxes above O Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above _ poInrs = u Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H ` 1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number i' V WDFW Priority Habitats 11'rinri habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. Ii Ltpb / Jw_tItw_.wa-4ioY/mtbI icationsIM 165wfdf%vl}01 �pii or access the list from here: w fw.w• . v n '(y its ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: w -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number Tp RATING SUMMARY -- Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): (A10#1ai lid Date of site visit: r l 5 / Io Rated by , 1 y_n.0t K&,4_ Ti� Trained by Ecology?kYes No Date of training—vi-s— HGM Class used for rating DP/IMWMA) Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y _�_N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY-42(based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 _Category III —Total score = 16 -19 /N_Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Water Quality Habitat Circle the appropriate ratings .Site Potential H M L H M L H M L Y Landscape Potential H M _ H M L H M L Value M L H L H M TOTAL Score Based on Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal III III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H, M, L 6=M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5=M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L, L 9 TM RT PST' WP-/5 l f 211( v 11-,v Wetland name or number 1 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality J 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. 2 points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff layer} is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y2 of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal Aon_dhig or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > %: total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y. total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above CI Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 I p D 2.3, Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 U D 2.4. Are they titer ources o€ p Ilutant coming into into the wetland that are n li ed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source A /Ixa A #X� e I Q t"J-e Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add Ne points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 or 4 = H 1 or 2 = M �0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 l/ D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above !!j Rating of Value If score is:X2-4 = H _1= M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number DEPRESS10NAL AN❑ FLATS WETLANDS HydrologIvNn¢tions -'Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation J 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 2 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage durinp wetperiods.- Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 /i t/ Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 - Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) paints = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1Z-16 = H _b-11 = M _U-5 = c rrecuru use ruurry Lill uIc JinL puyc ') 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? J 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 V D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 D Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above v Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H _1 or Z = M A_U = u rrecora me raring on tremor puyr I D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? -- D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding roblems. Choose the description thatbestmatches conditions around the wetland unit being rated oo nor add points. Choose the high es t score if more than an condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): ■ Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 I Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? l? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above sting of Value If score is: _2-4 = H X. 1 = M _ 0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 6 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number PJ R These questions apply to wetlands of'all HGM classes: HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat ,q 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of '4 ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or Y. ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points 1 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. e : 0 :5E) (*) None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number � LN H 1.5, Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y. ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strorn) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above I 7• Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 I Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon puints = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) _ 2 <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H 1-3 = M .'f < 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? I H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above points = 0 ,ating of Value If score Is: _2 = H �" = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number SF, WDFW Priority Habitats I"Nority fiahitnts listed by W DEW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. hoar l l�� clf�w_ wa�E;nvinuhlicntinEis/U{1l C+5 f weffru[](J� ti5.l3df or access the list from here: Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -growth west of Cascade crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). X lnstream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed :lsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number _E�S (Sa t4 fA RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): W[? rtj.1d I?+l Leij I S3,;L G Date of site visit: Rated by Trained by Ecology?X Yes _No Date of training 3 I f HGM Class used for rating a-y4&31h Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y XN NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY IJT (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 X Category III — Total score =16 - 19 Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Site Potential H Landscape Potential H Value — lU Score Based on Ratings Circle the appropriate ratings L H M L H M (� L H L H M M L H ® L H L TOTAL 7 _G7 1 � - j 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above x Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H, M, L 6 = M, M, M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = LLL Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numbers�l.('i Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods D 1.4, H 1.2 Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) D 2.2, D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 _ Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDIs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes Hydroperiods H 1.1, H 1.4 H 1.2 Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to another figure) R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R S.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 _ Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) L 3.1, L 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants H 1.2 51.3 Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (can be added to figure above) Boundary of 150 ft buffer (can be added to another figure) 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat S 4.1 S 2.11 S 5.1 H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) S 3.1, S 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 201S Wetland name or number —h�s (S-D qe HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? 0 go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). NO - go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. Q- go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, _The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number -B-S (go uc�6 - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine O The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 (YE,9'- The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number PCs-b�f-& DEPRESSIDNAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 0 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet eriods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or If dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 D Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above 1 3 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-ii = M 0-S = L Record the rating on the first page D S.D. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 I 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above I f Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = H X i or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: _2-4 = H X_1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 0 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number 6S ('SvtiCtA) DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff laver] is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions).Yes = 4 No = 0 U D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution ofpersistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y. of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal oondins or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > Y. total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above f Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H X 6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 v D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes =1 No = 0 { Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above f Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H 1 or 2 = M �0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plant as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:_2-4 = H _1 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number 65 CS K_A) these questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined far each class to meet the threshold of Y, ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if. The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (:0:) (2D None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number —[�-s 66D 'A� Eel H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H i Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M 3 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 I 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) 2 <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _4-6 = H _1-3 = M Y < 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H Y_1 = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number 5 CS ti� WDFW Priority Habitats Priority -habitats had by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. h w iw wz.Uov /pablig t n 1 5 wd g110 ] 6'-_)d#or access the list from here: tltt�i:lllh'dfN.l�ra�,d]VICiZnsL'i•�%�Cinr�lsai s ]ist ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -growth ►+yes nt' Cascade crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. M1atUI'C fnreSts - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). . Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number P., � rs_c ut-( A CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS ` Wetland Type - V Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0. Estuarine wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? — The dominant water regime is tidal, — Vegetated, and — With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt Yes -Go to SC 1.1 No= Not an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? Yes = CategoryI No - Go to SC 1.2 Cat. I SC 1.2. Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Spartino, see page 25) Cat. I At least Yt of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland has at least two of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or Cat. II contiguous freshwater wetlands. Yes = Category 1 No = Category 11 SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) SC 2.1. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of High Conservation Value? Yes - Go to SC 2.2 No - Go to SC 2.3 Cat. 1 SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? Yes = Category I No = Not a WHCV SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? EiEEc.//w-vwvjl.dnr.wa.go_v/nhp/refdesk/dala5i2dich/wnhowetlands.pdf Yes - Contact WNHP/WDNR and go to SC 2.4 No = Not a WHCV SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on their website? Yes = Category I No = Not a WHCV SC 3.0. Bogs Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below. if you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based an its functions. SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons, either peats or mucks, that compose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No - Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks, that are less than 16 in deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on top of a lake or pond? Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No = Is not a bog SC 3.3. Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? Yes = Is a Category I bog No - Go to SC 3.4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory, you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present, the wetland is a bog. Cat. SC 3.4. Is an area with peats or mucks forested (> 30% cover) with Sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce, or western white pine, AND any of the species (or combination of species) listed in Table 4 provide more than 30% of the cover under the canopy? Yes = Is a Category I bog No = Is not a bog Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 16 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 6 S (S-0 (k*) SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands Does the wetland have at least 1 cantE .vafrs acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. — Old -growth forests (west of Cascade crest): Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 in (81 cm) or more. — Mature forests (west of the Cascade Crest): Stands where the largest trees are 80- 200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an average diameter (dbh) exceeding 21 in (53 cm). Yes = Category I No = Not a forested wetland for this section I Cat. I ' SC S.O. Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? — The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) Cat. Yes — Go to SC 5.1 No = Not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of aggressive, opportunistic plant species (see list of species on p. 100). Cat. II — At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland is larger than 1/10 ac (4350 ft2) Yes = Category I No = Category II SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its habitat functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: — Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103 — Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105 Cat I — Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 Yes — Go to SC 6.1 No = not an Interdunal wetland for rating SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form (rates H,H,H or H,H,M Cat. II for the three aspects of function)? Yes = Category I No — Go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger? Yes = Category II No — Go to SC 6.3 Cat. III SC 6.3. Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac? Yes = Category III No = Category IV _J Cat. IV Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics If you answered No for all types, enter "Not Applicable" on Summary Form Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 17 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number P& RATING SUMMARY —Western Washington Name of wetland (or I D #): WV001 M4 D 6 ~%iL' is 72- Date of site visit: /1 k, Rated by Trained by Ecology? )(Yes No Date of trainingl-,S HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?rY _A_N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 Category III — Total score = 16 -19 Category IV — Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H L H CA L H M Landscape Potential H L H L H M L Value H M L H L H M V TOTAL Score Based on Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M, L, L 3 = L, L, L 1 Wetland name or number _E DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality 1) 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. /1 !/ points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a perrnanentlV flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff layer is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristig§ and distribution of gersistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y. of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal poncling or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y2 total area of wetland points = 4 2 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page . 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 Q D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 ( D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? . Source Yes =1 No = 0 C) Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above / Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 or 4 = H X 1 or 2 = M �0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 O D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aq uatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 / D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 °f Rating of Value If score is: K2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number _PE DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions-'lhdicators that the site functions to r.educe flooding and stream degradation 0 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Denth of storage during wetperiods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland tQ s_t_orage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above g Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 46-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 a D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 I D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Z Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = H _j 1 or 2 = M TO = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 I Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? O Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above eating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H X i = M �0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number PC - These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide iml H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? habitat H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 I Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30 cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unithas a Forestedclass, check if: X The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested poiy;on H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points d 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 < 5 species Points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (:D (:: 0 :) (*) (00 None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System For Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 'J %C Wetland name or number J)G 2 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures far egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above ?) Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M _X_0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 ' 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points - 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) 1 2 <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Q Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M X< 1= L I H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above Mating of Value If score is:_2 = H _1= M r 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 u points = 0 ( Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number p� WDFW Priority Habitats L'CiQrUX habitats I isted by W D 1M (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. ti w .talc v li inns l'l.6 wv lfw 65..}Lii or access the list from here: tt r w.w nv s v ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature Forests: k - wgst prCasca(le-Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings: with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age. Mature inr =- Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 -see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this listbecause they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numbertfAckylp/ RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): Uggidj6d 2&ek4 0�2 TAL 1172 Date of site visit: IbLs j 6 Rated by Trained by Ecology? J Yes No Date oftrainingA&E HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y __._V_N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions_�eor special characteristics) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score = 16 -19 Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Potential H L H V. L I H M Iscape Potential H P L I H C4 L I H M Value V M L H L H M (V TOTAL core Based on 3 f tatings l 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest [ Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L 2/114 i Wetland name or number —PE-A)H /P &lP / DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Wate0quallit-V Functions _ Indicators that the sife.functionsto improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or dufflayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Yz of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal poncling or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y2 total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Ya total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H X__6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 p D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 b D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes =1 No = 0 O Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H _�/1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 O D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? _ _ Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2— Rating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H _1= M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number _21- /PC /P fflPl DEPRESSI0NALAND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functiong - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, sufface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet eriods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 3 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage -in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 3 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above to Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11 = M ^O-S = L Record the rating on the first page ) 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residencelac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 I Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Z Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = H 1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score it more than one condition is rnet. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Mating of Value If score is: _2-4 = H K1= M ^0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number —P r/V &/Pff ! D I These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. 4ABITAT FUNCTIONS Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat ri 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y, ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 _.X_ Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if. The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points rl 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygross, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 5 species Points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (: 0 ) (*) ( 0 None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row = are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 ❑9 lJ Wetland name or number _DFjDC'/D+" /D I H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) ' Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y. ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) X Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M '-0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H Z.O. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]____ _ If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 I 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 4 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 ' Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) 2 <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M 4c 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? I H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H _1= M �0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 U points = 0 J Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number -PEf vO H / PZ WDFW Priority Habitats 'habimUs listd by W (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be Found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List, Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. 16S /wdfWQ0 I 655-1-1dl' or access the list from here: 1 T w� w noV s 'v1 ' r e'[) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. 3 — Old-growth/Mature forests: - raw li vas st of Ca5cade creq - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet eprairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, j and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. 1 — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to j enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) In diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 J Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 1 1 RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID I)1 Date of site visit: i v Rated by 3 - [ etk ri Trained by Ecology? X Yes No Date of training ± HGM Class used for rating la[f J7i47+c92►1= (_ Wetland has multiple HGM classes? =Y \ N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions )( or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 Category 11- Total score = 20 - 22 X Category III -Total score = 16 -19 Category IV -Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION I Improving I Hydrologic I Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings i5ite Potential H IVf L q) M L H M (1 (Landscape Potential H �NJ L Hi L H M (L Valuei M L H L H M l) TOTAL Score Based on 7 -7 3 Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above x Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number VT HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? �- go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. ru- go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). J@ - go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. -goto5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number D5 l0 - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 201S Wetland name or number D 7 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 3 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil Z in below the surface for duff layer is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions).Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent� (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1j Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal_pondine or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y2 total area of wetland points = 4 01 Area seasonally ponded is > Y total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y, total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H X 6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 ( D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes =1 No = 0 O Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above I Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 or 4 = H �' 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2— 3 Rating of Value If score is: X 2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number D1 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wetperiods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above / 2 Rating of Site Potential If score is: y 12-16 = H _6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 U D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No-_0 U Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above j Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H Y 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit Is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than One condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 r' The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? U Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H K 1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number i These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of /< ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac, Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 1: Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: h The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 _Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points L' H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 C 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species paints=0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points �1 All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) �i Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Site Potential If score is:___15-18 = H 7-14 = M 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 _ H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 f Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) — z 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-4-6 = H _1-3 = M •V < 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? I H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H _1= M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 U pom[s = u I Record the rating on the first page 14 IWetland name or number Nr WDFW Priority Habitats _l Priarily habitats listed by WDiIVY (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. v r► i •i 55 w w 0 l or access the list from here: httpllwdfw_wa.v,Q n 5 L] Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). 1 — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: old -growth wcSL 01 Q ,cjide cres- Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. LIat:itrE ter �sls - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak; Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). i— Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and j terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet j! prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snag% have a diameter at breast height of> 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number � � i/ W N RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): Date of site visit: I i" ', /f i, Rated by k-1V Trained by Ecology?Z Yes _No Date of Lraining 3L: HGM Class used for rating -,Jokex Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY --11C (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III — Tota I score = 16 -19 X Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving I Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings ite Potential H M o H M(DL H M andscape Potential H IV L H M p H M L Value ; M L H I&f L H M© TOTAL core Based on tatings (0 4- 3 i 3 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland f Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) CHARACTERISTIC Estuarine CATEGORY I II [ Wetland of High Conservation Value Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon [ II interdunal I II III IV None of the above r• 9= H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6=H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = LLL Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numberG���!� HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? 9go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. go to 3 YES - The vved ind class is Flats 11-your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form jbr Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe] 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO - go to 5 ES The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number�G/�-N NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional S. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated Slope + Riverine HGM class to use in rating I Riverine Slope + Depressional I Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe_ �� Riverine + Lake Fringe — Depressional j Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number V-0-ClAm SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality 5 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1, Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1%slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 - Slope is > 2%-5% points =1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. Try sail 2 in below the surface (or ritrff layer] is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 51.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > X of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > X of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants >'/ of area points =1 (J Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_32 = H _6-11= M X0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? D Yes=1 No= 0 S 2.2, Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question 5 2.1? Other sources-?S Yes =1 No = 0 Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:'X 1-2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.2. Is the wetland In a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list. Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES 2- if there is a TMDL for the basin in which unit is found. Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:_)�_2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 11 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number � 1k-G 1'V_ /V SLOPE WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually>'/a in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1= M '{-0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess U surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1= M _X_0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 r Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 f No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6,2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:_2-4 = H ?t 1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 1 I J J I J Wetland name or number 14-9 1961 These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of X ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 if the unit has a Forested class, check if.• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperlods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or ac to count (see textfor descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 `Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygross, purple laosestrlfe, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 Q < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats 1 Decide from the diagrams below whether Interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described In H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you havefouror more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row�.,> are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 13 J Wetland name or number _Y.,a / kc l P H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y. ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants covQr less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of srrarn) _ Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1S-18 = H _7-14 = M _X_0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of i km Polygon 20-33% of 1 km Polygon 10-19% of 1 km Polygon < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 3 points = 2 points = 1 points = 0 H 2,2, Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-509,.' and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity Total for H 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_4-6 = H _1-3 = M X< 1= L points = (- 2) points = 0 Add the points in the boxes above 1 U Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? ` H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state orfederal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H _1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page C Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number �_ R3'+_G ('=,\/ WDFW Priority Habitats l „ ,' (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008, Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. (W 11,�, f wslwY LMdA .; •: 1 l x iltl lGS I or access the list from here: ll }: W L M I'W'16121llphslLU) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit; NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands. Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — old-growth/Mature forests: Old-grin!eth west of Cascadgcrest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming multi- ' layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 tree s/ac (Z0 trees/ha ) > 3 2 1 n (81 cm) dbh cr > 200 years of age. M;itItig tor�esrs - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100% decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that i found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak croak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 156 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each. other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet c prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, anCi/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA. 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 15 Wetland name or numb eF VAAP1�FIKTA tl/K-U✓ RATING SPMOAARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID # YA%KD/�(i;/K`f/xl,{I►�d/kw Date of site visit: Rated by 4V Trained by Ecology?X Yes _No Date of training fZ L HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y)( N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY M (based on functions or special characteristics) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 — Score for each Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 function based on three Cate o III —Total score = 16 -19 g ry rating's _Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 (order c+i ratings is not FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat important) W_ ater Quality 9 = H,H,H Circle the oppropriate rotir_gs g = H,H,M 7= H,H,L 7= H,M,M Site Potential H M H L H M] H M Landscape Potential H M (I� H M (J) 6= H,M,L Value (F� M L H I�i }i . L H M L TOTAL 6 = M,M,M Score Based on ( I 5 = H,L,L Ratings L-- -N 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog Mature Forest Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal None of the above III III iV jC Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numberI KA10 ;:/KT/V.o/l`VJ/Kvj HGM Classification of Wetlands In Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? 9- go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe lfyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the fortes for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe iris an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>40%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. go to 3 YES - The vl e,, I..i nd class is Flats your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the firm for Dept e.ssional werfands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (S ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft [2 m). 0 go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), x The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, Y-The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. N 0 - go to 5 (gL The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, _The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wettand name or number 1� I} I KIC> I y_F % KT/KU / kV / I4-W NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present" is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY'r0 DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated T Slope + Riverine Slope + Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe T Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional + Lake Fringe Riverine + Lake Fringe Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland HGM class to use in rating Riverine Depressional Lake Fringe Depressional Depressional Riverine Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the ra tiny. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 201,E Update Raring Form - Effective January 1, 20 LS 1. .. Wetland name or, number . Kilo D / KF j ILT 1 K�A j \eQ 1 kW SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland; (a 1% slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 points = 1 51ope is > 2%-5% � Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in bglow_th-e sur;a_g_ or dufflayerl is true clay or true organic [use NRCS definitionsJ; Yes = 3 No = 0 S 13, Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > % of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > A of area points = 1 Does not meet ariv of the criteria above for n{ants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above _j Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12 = H _6-11 = M _Z0-S = L Record the rating on the first page 5 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? 5 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 _ 5 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2.1? Other sources Yes =1 No = C Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-1-2 = M 0 = L Record the rating an the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that Is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = D U 5 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin Is on the 30.3[d) list. Yes = 1 No = 0 5 3.3. Has the site been identified Ina watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES Z if there is a TMDL far the basin in which unit is found. Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for 3 Add the points in the boxes above —j Rating of Value If score is;_2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 11 K14�1CD�KF/I�i �k�i��v/Kw Wetland name or number SLOPE WETLANDS Flydrolo8[e Functions - 1p�iCators that the site functiqnsjq_reoqcgifioodrrfg and streim ertislo0 S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough fusually> 1/3 In), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 U All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1= M _�_ O = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland In land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1= M ,; 0 = L Record the rating an thetirst page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points =1 ' No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as Important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:__2-4 = H 1= M _0 = L Record the rating on tree p►st page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 I I I 1 1 I I I J 11 J J Wetland name or number K A / KP/ K F/ kT/ K WI/ K J /kW _ — th4js.e qu%ttii1or11 APPLY to wetl4ads fit all HGh1 classee; AI• FUNCTIONS 0d(l dt0fI tha[ Ate NnLt OM, V'.:lLkwitle i rt:lnt habaet H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin Glosses and strata within the Forestea class. t=necK Tne Cowardln plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches maybe combined for each class to meet the threshold of Mac or more than 10% of the unit fit is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have> 30%cover) 2 structures: points=l _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check If _The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or H ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or Inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or Inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream In, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. DMFerent patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfall, reed conarygrass, purple laosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: to 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 e5 species points =0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points_. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 13 U 0 0 J rr •f, Wetland name or number, k�l 1LA /KF/IKT/k u/KV/I�L11 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland, The'number of-chetrksis the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long;. _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 It (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y. ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-1B = H _7-14 = M _�( 0-6 = L H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit), Record the rating on the first page Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_ +[(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/21_= % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 krn Polygon points = 2 10-19°.6 of 1 km Polygon points =1 10% of 1 km Polygon _ _ ao;nts = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_ + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/21_= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Pelygo:P points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high Intensity land use points = ( 21 s 50% of 1 km Pnlygnn Is high intensity _ points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M ' __< 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0, Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetiond being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priorlty species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — it has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or In a watershed plan O Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 1 Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H _1= M —Y0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1'I Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 -1 I I I - Wetland name or numberiKh� Kp, IY--F / Kcr/ KLI / Kkvj WDFW Priority Habitats -, I'riarrty ]�:dtEt,tt. I�sre�! h tl �w (see complete descriptions of WDFW priorityhabitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washirgton Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008, Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. hill_1S{lti�,y�wy Oil 1)IAt or access the list From here: 1.11tp�:J1wdL�wsL•: utt; ,:��nse�•v,u ic,ni:R11SJ. s �) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE, This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unitand the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in NiDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and (orbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: f_1(11- g o :�s! - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ] > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. ,vim • Iit3 nLy-. lti - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFWPHS report p. 158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacen t to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies. Herbaceous, non -Forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet j prairie (Dull descriptions in WDF'NPHS reportp. 161 -see web link above]. "JI — instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements For instream fish and wildlife resources. 1 — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast iearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descrij)tions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). i i — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, J ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. 6.S ft 2,0 of basalt, andesite, — Talus; Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - (0.15 • m), composed and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: 'frees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm] in western Washington and are � 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority lags are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priorityhabitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 15 i SEGTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, KK WL-GB sMM&1lly ,Flooded NORTH EX. TRAIL, TYP 1 I l� I 1 1 VIEWPORT 3 SGALE: 1 "-60' P-r- C) ,€`rQ�der� .sew ov-�m rly pr-P6-DO-P1 PPO n ID o LOLe,-t seas olnm/I y -F[ oc)d d DE-LI DE-81 �WL-D , K FLAGS I=81 - WL-DG FLAGS I-& i 1 DF-1 DF-5 WL-DF DG_g FLAGS 1-5 AL-DH / FLAGS 1-5 / --» - OH-1 DI-4 DH-5 DI-1 / FLA65 1-4 )/ I cs 4u -~ / I\ SEGTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. f EX. TRAIL, TYP. I 1 I I 1 I WL-AC FLA65 1-4, 103, 105, 101.1 118-106, 104, 5-8, 1-1-13, f I-q, ISI� 1 WL-BR � ► i FLAOS 1-15 _ -- C35- I BG WL-BS-S FLAC5 I-4 EX15TINO EDGE OF CANOPY, TYP. J Y I EWPORT SCALE: 1 "-60' iTE-4F, H Ffm J 'Sm ohaji -rl voov J al 3 rBa-118 E 101 y 1� Ba-105 l Ba-103 ST RO-*LATEFb Ba-4 BQ-115 I: AG C5 FLA6�k 1-10 1 AH-1 - a AH-10 AF-I FLA651-6 ` AG -I -- AL-AE j 1 A±✓_1� r FLA651-6 I 1 _1 m � Ba-5 Ba-b A AG -I sewboa 11 y -R oodtd fe*m4Y1emk sfTe4A PF,D/pEm PTA S�16� `FlDOG1f�� 44 a se4i byta t! b � V -<4 Q CD co C— .- m�m CV W _06) 0 0 �� l � �r • 4 F Y�M•4p�•- • .r+ f' WV IL co }r • d N Ili i V3 L ..�_- � 1• Y Off- y �s ) M � �� ?f� � r xM1 °pi''.� it tw tP isp 1 ��� �M�w� �'� "'. �:I 6a ink- _ -.+_� i ;�• '•�"�R��Rll�t -,-�,- .... ... r 'may � r r•�' _ ��:=' ."� �. ! �-X{d'IIt _ , .. 3.� - J • •i;��_ IAI rS/rr'Sr• 1 Yam`. viFi _ ' r Im L`` L '�. •�^ rya � Y���.:; - - i Pa`� rr I.J w,� . _ .��y � � �I � 1 ?• ?. .y � :S�y ��! a `� C T _ram-�-.. y :_ �/I! q. .•4 s � '. 41 CD s� .4 iy r: L br"Y `' • �_ 3 11.�`1 —� hr r �.s irr=�. `i� �� C) .► n l' i•. i PO 'I V161 IL N to ��,�>� �•.�r ' {�= •rim ram.- � - •: � ' �► ' -.� � . .,�' .--�'• ..�•v `3fr �� ICI i .15'��' w.y.. � ! '. �'vf-yam ��''�' � � - l i 'M w � 3 •�� '^' � i..�l' �1.1Y�� � T�iJ�!:1• �;� � I ,i _-. �..� • , ter; ! rt �; �I"th � + - - mia R y ., #` �4 oil e/�' • III i• f�1 - �y Y ? � •' � � � � • � �`� r. • � 4 . ,.� ' � _- are � -� by } L W w 0) 4 0 as o a u Q o p { •��.,.�"�'. _...- Yr.N�y __ v mot' R �, • Ilk t l IV ki r �� ire. •i - _ • X b tai �1 I i *.� ; � �+ i • i. � a _ . •• ��_�i:.�i � w ..{Stir .•f� . �- . aI V. tom ot ,�.� r� �: • �:. � �; ��' � �i�•- ^fir _. �,� •� � .� �.. r IL ` � 1�em�. ` � � �� •� y�1 C� � I' ' W �;,��, N 4-T r `•tom=-••!r:_:i= �.•s� . • � _ 'k•R•• ti'l'}: ?]� t`�; 'dax.� rs-:••� �s��;S��. • N L,,}.,y Y �.. _.4 •�� • !' "Y • iL ' s Y� y - ■ �Y A ! • �• ^.fir CD CD r fir" .L'. CP I �I.r +� or r. y • _ ' r. _ � ''ice'• �_ .. f a .spa... if � Ri• - � � •, u a � F, ,•yC!•' � �:'.1' �. -yJ�- -' ,� 41+N. !!� i, ix .� rr,.N,yiiv •syJp.Lq�. _ . �' ��`1 ' � ` o.. �'�' ` ti ti _ _- "�,':i; .ice •.4 �,i-n'• '�`^'���1�-..� '�rt � . - Yi • �• � I ; ; �n� �y � ��'.� .�. .. •' T�' �_.•#�L ���..y �� Jytfj/~�r -� ryr • .V 5 • v i+ i 1}}'• w • �11p - �' :� � Q f r - •� - Fl ; .irk • .� � R I LLJ a _- sal •.r�, - � . � �f � � E � � '���' .. �{rM. .. w, .. i. � 4 ' `'�` r �. a 0 c� :1 -<4 a CD I, �M � ». i�'- �•_ '�PA� �,� �'� ,r:} ii�ily.� - "=j_i. .5"Y•- ���� 4y�T r - L i k Nil { N ■ �r tt L it � '.�,, �`� , ,,•-�# ;�' 1 • ` - ►�'-. l ,Wow71 77 C7 f - • A� 4 14 1�A �. �! p� • c µ rf.•.-ta• h Y• 1 1 . .*r .1.� . 1 .r* r � � • �w r •-� ti J,IK AJUA Wo R j WN y � �j��h���4� •' 1. �� - r, tt f ,.� � - ,�. � -��� �••� �_ -� 1 cc 1 • - 5 w I I 1 I I I j j :w, w lH `aIlcA .h+ anV Alala`I J anV U.Q S antl Q,S,; 3 antl pVZ IS _ S a"V puZS - �a c a.•V ull•I w -�52l fPitt 1 c ✓, yl � S ar•V �IIBf � �' O a= . 5 anV PUZf 'Yfl, d 0 � 'IV UIeZ a I Inc �Ea iJ�17,^A7 �i�f S AMH 1-J ed- u - I ................ ; � Iy� u.y u9t - x ,nV 41SI jany Pday V IIB V' v 5 an l r_ F g ./ $ �+Yr �, ; Y•.. UIB �" �r:, 1 G a+x� antl ISl I�1I• :..! �j.wpic �.......,..,.ri _ .i - - Pa:1,c Hwy+ 3entl 419L "nS 'IV 4,9 / r .f antl U194 .r INanVPl29 IJS anV LIZ, ��"• .p.s.__I,. v, MS anV IIZ 2611•Aec SW ILS "AV UILZ/ h5S ",otl UIS£ pollali�P 13 0 _ 2 p� ISI ISN +"1'ri4i }�k N IS alaal5 N IS guy N 15 llaunf N < 1 . w.'b'l•� a ■ ¢ P � � Ey � 15+rr.[rw.11y f�$8 i� j WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (TMDLs) Overview of the process Project Catalog by WRIA by County Funding Opportunities Project Dp% elopment Priority L sV, Related Information TMDL Contacts RELATED ECOLOGY PROGRAMS Water Quality J J J i J Wieter Duakty Imoroyemem V)Attr Ltua![h [morn itrn—t FrV1e:L5 bk_�y�i4 -•- - �• �'-, WRIA 10: Puyalltap-White The following table lists overview information for water quality improvement projects nius R (also known as total maximum daily loads, or TMDLs) for this water resource •' Q inventory area (WAa). Please use links (where available) for more information on a project. 22 Counties . i.ino County m l E r c E C- Pierta_Count� �•- Waterbody Name Pollutant Status' • TMDL Leads Clarks Creek Divalved OvvgV Approved by EPA Donovan Gras• Meeker Creek Sediment 360-407-6407 Has an implementation plan Fecal Call* Approved by EPA Has an implementation plan Commencement Barr Dioxin Approved by EPA Donovan Grav 350-407-6407 Puvalluo River Watershed Fecal ealdarm Approved by EPA Donavan Grav 360-407-6407 Mufti -ohmmeter A Approved by EPA Ammonia-N BOD (5-day) White River Watershed Approved by EPA Upper White: Sediment Temperature Under Development Lower White . PH South PraiKe Creek Fecal Coliform Approved by EPA Donovan Grav Tributary: Temperature Has an 360-407-6407 Wilkeson/Gale implementation plan Creek e' Status ,,0 be ftted as one of the Tap wV.- Appraved 6), FF4, VnCer Deveropment or Imprementatron l l 1 l Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment {Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 APPENDIX B Existing Conditions Report GREENLINE HEADQUARTERS BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL, DATED 30 OCTOBER 2017 (PERMIT NO. 17-100484-00-SU) 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix B CITY OF ,ti Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalwaY.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor October 30, 2017 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: File #17-101484-SU; BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL Greenline Headquarters BLA, 33663 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: The City of Federal Way has completed an administrative review of the above -referenced Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application. The Department of Community Development hereby approves the 18- page survey drawing titled Boundary Line Adjustment for Federal Way Campus prepared by ESM, resubmitted on October 20, 2017. BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to alter the interior lot lines between nine lots in the Corporate Park-1 (CP-1) zone. The existing and proposed lot areas of the nine parcels before and after adjustment are shown in the tables below. The existing Greenline Headquarters Building and its associated parking lots will be located on proposed Lot 5. Area% Prior to Afliustment PARCEL K 16.252 ACRES 707,930 S.F. PARCEL 0 0.489 ACRES 21,310 S.F. PARCEL Q 33.159 ACRES 1,444,400 S.F. PARCELS 84.788 ACRES 3,693,350 S.F. PARCEL T 2.064 ACRES 89,900 S.F. PARCEL U 1 38.787 ACRES 1,689,540 S.F. PARCEL V 18.980 ACRES 826,780 S.F. PARCEL W 41.554 ACRES 1,810,090 S.F. PARCEL Z 1.922 ACRES 83,740 S.F. 6reas After Adiustment LOT 1 19.721 ACRES 859,050 S.F. LOT 2 12.878 ACRES 560,970 S.F. LOT 3 1.217 ACRES 53,010 S.F. LOT 4 2.940 ACRES 128,080 S.F. LOT 5 101.495 ACRES 4,421,120 S.F. LOT 6 15.456 ACRES 673,270 S.F. LOT 7 16.853 ACRES 734,120 S.F. LOT 8 3,943 ACRES 171,740 S.F. LOT 9 63.284 ACRES 2,756,650 S.F. RIGHT -OF- WAY 0.208 ACRES 9,030 S.F. DECISIONAL CRITERIA City staff has determ ined the BLA meets decisional criteria set forth in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 18.10: I. The BLA is an alteration in the location of lot boundaries on existing lots. The BLA will not increase the number of lots, nor diminish the size of open space or other protected environments. A critical areas repoit was submitted, "Existing Conditions Report Greenline Headquarters Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels K, O, Q, S, T, U, V, W, Z)", by Talasaea (revised repot date: August 29, 2017). Mr. LaBrie October 30. 2017 Page 2 The report was peer reviewed and documented in memos August 18, 2017 and October 16, 2017 by the City's consultant, ESA. The wetland delineations, ratings, and buffers have been reviewed, and are shown on the BLA drawing. 2. The BLA will not diminish the size of any lot so as to result in a lot of less square footage than required in the CP-1 zoning district. The 1994 Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) for the subject property does not contain a prescriptive minimum lot size for the CP-1 zone. 3. The BLA will not result in the reduction of setbacks or lot coverage to less than required in the CP- l zoning district. In the CZA for the subject property no setbacks are specified for the CP-I zone, except for the continuous Managed Forest Buffer to be provided around the entire perimeter of the CP-I property, which is unaffected by the BLA. The CZA contains a lot coverage standard of 70% of the total CP-1 zoned property, which is unaffected by the BLA. 4. Under the pre-BLA conditions, three of the parcels were segregated by public rights -of -way. Asa result of the BLA, lot number 4 will be bisected by a public right-of-way. RECORDING Pursuant to FWRC 18.10,060, all boundary line adjustments shall be recorded with the King County Division of Elections and Records. The signed mylar original BLA documents have been routed to appropriate City officials for signature. We will provide you the two mylar originals when signed. The applicant will be recording the BLA. Please return one conformed recorded mylar original to Jim Harris in the Community Development Department, immediately after recording. No changes to the BLA document are allowed following City signature. If the County recording process necessitates revisions to the BLA map, you must request and receive approval of any changes from City staff prior to recording. The applicant must also record the Statutory Warranty Deed at the same time of recording the BLA. Return a copy of the recorded deed to Ann Dower in the Public Works Department. CLOSING The boundary line adjustment is approved based on the decisional criteria above. This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Jim Harris, Senior Planner, at 253-835-2652, or• jinn.harris@cityoffederalway.corn. Sincerely, 6�_� Brian Davis Community Development Director c: .rim Harris. Senior Planner Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Sen ior Traffic Engineer Robert "Doc' Hansen_ Planning Manager Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Tom Messmer, tmessmera industrialrealtygrou1).com 17-1014%] Doc I D 76327 J J J Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 APPENDIX 131 GREENLINE HEADQUARTERS BLA, WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2015 - 2017 Conditions Report 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix B1 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal WayXing Sampling Date:3/2312017 Applicant/Owner: Federal Wav Camnus LLC State: WA Sampling Point: IA-UPL1 Investigator(s): KN Section, Township, Range: S16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 10-15 Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47.301547 Long:-122.301027 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 9 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N, Soil Y, or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation N, Soil N, or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site neap showing sampling point locations, transacts, important reatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Sample point is north of wetland. Located in mowed field with shallow glacial till. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. Grass species 2. Taraxacum officinale 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 0 = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multipl r�bv^ OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 0 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = 70 Y FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 30 Y FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 100 =Total Cover ElProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Grasses were assumed FAC for the dominance test. Grasses lacked sufficient distinguishing characteristics to make species IDs. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: IA-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 3/2 100 SL 4-17 10YR 511 85 10YR 5/6 15 C M SL Prominent feature 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ® Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all Thal apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 15 (includes capillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, Remarks: Saturation is below 12" so not considered wetland hydrology. Secondary Indicators (2 or more reauired) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (132) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal Way/KingWay/King Sampling Date:3/23/2017 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus LLC State: WA Sampling Point: IA-WET1 Investigator(s): KN Section, Township, Range: S16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 5-8 Subregion (LRR): A Lat: 47.301412 Long:-122.301068 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood -gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation N, Soil Y, or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation N, Soil N, or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important Mdl!.urea, Gw. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: Sample point in north section of wetland. Located In mowed field with shallow glacial till. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: j_Lft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. Grass species 2. Juncus effusus 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cpv_er Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 0 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °I Cover of: Multiiy key- OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAG species x 3 = 0 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = 60 Y FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 40 Y FACW Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: E Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ElProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 100 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: Grasses were assumed FAC for the dominance test. Grasses lacked sufficient distinguishing characteristics to make species IDs. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: IA-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-2 10YR 3/2 100 SL 2-16 10YR 412 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M SL Prominent feature 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ® Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired: check all that ao I Secondary Indicatgrs Q or more reouired] ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 5 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes ca illa fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 J J J Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1 Existing Conditions APPENDIX 132 GREENLINE HEADQUARTERS BLA, WETLAND RATING FORMS WITH FIGURES, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2017 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix B2 Wetand name or number 7q M /A R /o4 5 14 0 RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): M /.4 x 44 s /4 O _ Date of site visit: I Rated by �L/jj:,1 Trained by Ecology?,krYes ❑ No Date of training HGM Class used for ratings ?8., Wetland has multiple HGM classes? ❑ Yes NOTE: Form Is not complete with out the figures requested (figures can be combined). `!�\ Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY -:I:V'- (based on functions *Or special characteristics ❑) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score =16 - 19 ljkf Category IV - Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving I Hydrologic I Habitat Water Quality List appropriate rating (H. M Q Site Potential Landscape Potential Value Total Score Based on / Ratings !3 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Estuarine I Wetland of High Conservation Value I J Bog Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon Interdunal None of the above Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings Is not important) 9=H,H,H 8=H,H,M 7=H,H,L 7=H,M,M 6=H,M,L 6=M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5 = M, M, L 4=M,L.L 3 = L, L. L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or nui A t I ft f—' AS f ft SLOPE WETLANDS Water.auallty Functions- lhdii atori that the site functions to Improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1 % slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1 % or less points = 3 Slope is > 1 % - 2% points = 2 Slope is > 2% - 5% points = 1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff laver) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 S 1 3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. 3 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > Mz of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > Yz of area points = 2 v Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points = 1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score Is: ❑ 12 = H ❑6 -11 = M VD - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in Q land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 S 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are I not listed in question S 2. Other Sources 5 Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above 6 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: i - 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, nn lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 L S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above " Rating of Value If score is: it i•2 - 4 = H ❑ 1 = M I I 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 6 Record the rating on the first page WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number fiM /At L< JA D SLOPEMETLANDS Hydrolgglc;Fdhctians - In.dicaio'rs.that:the site'ftinctii7ns to reduce.flcoding and stream srosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually > '/e in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If scare is: L]7 = M AM = L Kecom me rating on me rust page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 01 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: ❑1 = M )]0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points =1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Value If score is: ❑ 2 - 4 = H 1 = M L] 0 = L Mecoro me rating on me nrsr page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 7 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number to 1 " rAS/ryl% v These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to. provide important habitat I H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y44 ac or more then 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. ❑ Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points - 1 ❑ Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: ❑ The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested oolvaon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or %4 ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods ). ❑ Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = i� Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 'e 0 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 ❑ Saturated only 1 types present: points = C ❑ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland ❑ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland ❑ Lake Fringe wetland 2 points ❑ Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 _ < 5 species pints = 0= 0 _ H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low = 1 point All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3 points V Moderate = 2 points I 8 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update - Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 9 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Weiland name or number , A M I �3�1 A 1 A$ to H 1.5. Special habitat features: f"� Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. ❑ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long) ❑ Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland ❑ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) ❑ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) ❑ At least Y4 ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) [A Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata ) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes abov2L 0 Rating of site Potential If Scare is: ❑ 15 -18 = H ❑ T -14 ■ M %0 - 6 = L Record the raring on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site? H 2.1 Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetiand unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat + { % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) _ If total accessible habitat is: >'/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 L 20 - 33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10 -19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 t < 10 % of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat + ( % moderate & low intensity land uses 12) _ Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 pp I Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Po on points = 0 H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (-2) _< 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensi points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Landscape Potential if Score is: ❑ 4 - 6 - H U l - 3 = M I"« 1 = L mecory me sang on me TITS[ page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 ❑ It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) ❑ It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) ❑ It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species d . ❑ It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources ❑ It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or In a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) with in 100m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 10 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number Rating of Value If Scare is: �❑ 2 = H 1 = M = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 11 Record the rating on the first page WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number I � I 7 j WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats _iisted_by, WOFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. htt )twdfw.wa. 1 ubiicatio 1 16 1 fw00165. df or access the list from here: htt :llwdW.wa. ovlconservation! hs/list/ Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat_ ❑ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha) ❑ Siodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). ❑ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches cf grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. ❑ Old-growth/Mature forests: Old growth west of Cascade crest — Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature Forests — Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. ❑ Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158— see web link above) ❑ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. ❑ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 — see web link above). ❑ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. ❑ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report — see web link on previous page). ❑ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. ❑ Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. ❑ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. ❑ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 12 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or numbeF' ,D KE / ��I�D�1�7�K �t�l� �I K wliex RATINGS MMARY — Western Washington 9A�PI r-r✓14FI r-D/KT Name of wetland (or ID It): .i,� I k w f �' Date of site visit: -Yx'1(-� Rated by 10N Trained by Ecology?xC Yes No Date of training�• �. HGM Class used for rating____S Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_YN NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY M (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III -Total score = 16 - 19 _Category IV - Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality _ _ _ Circle the appropriate ratings :site Potential H M H M H M Landscape Potential H GP L H M Cp H M (y Value M L H L H M U TOTAL Score Based on (v ¢ 3 Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon f I II 1 II III IV Interdunal - None of the above X Score for each function based on three ratings (order (. j ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7=H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number Pk n1 I V-'r A -DI k-r (V-J I V Y' I Kx HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western VVashington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? (9- go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. 696- go to 3 YES- The wetlarid class is Flats your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). 0 - go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), >C The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO -go to 5 E�S - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number l K& /KF IkDI �-r1 �Ul �--v' V—W l Imo x NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. (VOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE lfyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the ra ting. Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numb kkI Ke /L, L o f �-TI Y—V r-\// L Wle-K SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1% slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 Slope is > 2%-5% points = 1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surfs e gr duff laverIlaverl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = D U S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > % of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > X of area points = 1 Cj Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12 = H _6-11= M 0 5 = L Record the rating on the first page Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-1-2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the firsr page Rating of Value If score is:_C 2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 11 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 14-b /�1.Ko f Tl KU / 14/ KKI r XI ,,.-OPC : E-MANDS Hydroloiic functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually >'/, in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland In land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1= M _.�0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems. The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface Flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points =1 j No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as Important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O U Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:_2-4 = H _1= M _ti = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 VAI Wetland name or number /kElk-P kUl L-�—f V-U/ rvl kvi f LA These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. t MITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat —A H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indkators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardln plant classes In the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Jf ac or more than 1096 of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. ,Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20%within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y4 ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or Inundated 2 types present: points =1 }Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species In the wetland that cover at least iD ft2. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 <5 species points =0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can Include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row _ u - are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 0 C) i►A�/' r Wetland name or number / KEb-IFA-DI j j % 1i'U / ki V/ 4V14 IV_ H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The'number of4heakslPthe number of points. I` _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter'and 6'h long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y. ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_35-18 = H _7-14 = M _)< 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.O. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? ' H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat thatdirectly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/21_ _ % If total accessible habitat is; > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)_= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-501% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) _ Z 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M < 1= L ( H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Add the points in the boxes above I r) Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H _3 = M _[0 = L U points = 0 1 Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14. Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number P i�-5 / -P / ,4P J k'rf V_U1 WDFW Priority Habitats I'llionly haintatsE "4 (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitatand Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. ll L ;/Iwdfy,,-w,i Lu pultlicai011S,=65!vdi' yOU6-5 W or access the list from here: 11s1�/-w W.wa,�QVlcon� sv�ationhyhsflist!) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. } — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW P11S report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: ,f2(t;l-growth west -cif Carcade_tw- t - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age. Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 156 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above]. Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. ` Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 15 Wetland name or number RATING SUMMARY —Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): "3IV-6 ZTact lr-rzh--c Date of site visit: l h! ll L Rated by �/- N Trained by Ecology?Z Yes No Date of training�U HGM Class used for rating G Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY -13Z� (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Tota I score =16 -19 X Category IV -Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Water Quality Hydrologic Habitat Circle the appropriate ratings ;Site Potential H M H M O H M O Landscape Potential H (N L H M© H M Value M L H® L H M© TOTAL Score Based on Ratings 1 1 4 :��3 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L 1 7 Wetland name or number�G��N`�p/lG//z`�I HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? CO - go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. IC - go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). (5 go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? .The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO - go to 5 ES The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, _The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number_k'_k�Gb/—Nbe-P/P-0L/K f2 45 NO —go to 6 YES — The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO — go to 7 YES — The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO — go to 8 YES — The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or Ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1%slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 .� Slope is > 2%-5% points =1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The sail 2 in below the surface or duff layerlayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 5 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants >'% of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > Y. of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points =1 (J Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants paints = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12 = H _6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 D S 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question 5 2.1? Other sources Pik &rS Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above J Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: X 1-2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the f►rst page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the C 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list. Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES Z if there is a TMDL for the basin in which unit is found. Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 11 Wetland name or number .�3 1I-G SLOPE WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? I 5 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually> 1/8 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. v Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1= M >�_O = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1= M X_0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 5 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H � 1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y, ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 oc. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiads). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present, points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 (� < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number - I kC /" 1 K ply 6L I KP--1 Kf H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) XInvasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M _K0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/21_= % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)—= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 I Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) — Z 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above p Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-4-6 = H _3-3 = M _< 1= L I H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above _ points = 0 Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H _1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page X Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 -1 Wetland name or number �_ 0 I,-G 1 K N !" /K--& l �_ X /9-1 i WDFW Priority Habitats Pl iorily habitats listed by WDT,W (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177pp.hitn:/Iwdf,6v.wo.gov/ptiblicatiofislQDjfzS/wdfwDO]6S.licl or access the list from here: hCl,� Lvs+d ly�a.eorrLeonse�v��l/�hsJ�} _ Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha), 1 — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. i — Old-growth/Mature forests: 0JJ-gr«wtL west of Cascade crest -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.156 - see web link above). 1 — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and JI terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - 1 see web link on previous page). 1 — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. J — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft _J (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 I 1 1 I I j Wetland name or number 1 A l 4r k,/FV /FIN RATING SUMMARY —,Wester? liV''as�hington }E/�dl /f V/-F4✓ I t of site visit: iA�s�6 Name of wetland (or ID #) _ Rated by Trained b� tc'o'lo�y7,� Yes No Date of training HGM Class used for ratings 1�,gei Wetland has multiple HGM classes7_Y _X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY -IV- (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I -Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 -19 _Category IV -Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Site Potential H M Landscape Potential H M Value 1CJ M L Score Based on r� Ratings :! Circle the appropriate ratings H M H M H M 6-H M 45> H 10 L H M D TOTAL 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I LI Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7=H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M"M 5=H,L,L 5 = M, M, L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L, L, L rig''I m 0 4� r �t�Ir� Wetland name or number wit r'F{I1� SLOPE WETLANDS. Water Qualitv Funcfl6n.s - iririicarnrsthat,.the'sire �1rIC�lOfiStO Irr1�3f prove,water er �r81it�� S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quallty7 S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 196 slope has a 1 ft vertical drop In elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 1 Slope Is > 2%-5% points =1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2,in below the surface (or duff laver) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions); Yes = 3 No = 0 S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points = 3 p Dense, woody, plants > % of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > X of area points =1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 _ Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above mating of 51te Potential If score is:_12 = H _6-11= M `- 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 5 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland In land uses that generate pollutants? _ Yes=1 No= 0 S 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2.1? Other sources Yes = 1 No = 0 U Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-1-2 = M k0 = L Record the rating on the first page 5 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the I 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 5 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list. Yes = 1 No = 0 5 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as Important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES Z if there is a TMDL for the basin in which unit Is found. Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above 4— Rating of Value If score is • X 2.4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page it Wetland name or number rprI eut *--V t F •`r SLOPE WETLANDS HydroiogiclFunctions _- _Indicators trot the site functions to reduce S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? and stream erasion S 41. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually> 1/8 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:,1= M j� 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess o surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1 = M 3( 0 = L Record the rating on the first page 5 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points =1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? U Yes = 2 No = 0 _)tal for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above r Rating of Value If score is:_2-4 = H X1 = M _0 = L NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS J Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 12 J Wetland name or number- 1:41 F011FV f rW These questions appiy to wetiand5 of all HG[W classes. "ABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1, Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes In the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of '/< ac or more than 10' o of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 D _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than lWo of the wetland or Y, ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 _Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 p Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points _Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name (� the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygross, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 <5 Species points =0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can Include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. C2) (*) (0 ) D None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row'' -e HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number Z A' :FV / F V j :P . H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) ' _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present In areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) )XInvasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strain} Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above r Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M K _0-6 = L Record the rating on Merirsr page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_= % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon 20-33% of 1 km Polygon 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 3 points = 2 points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat> 50% of Polygon points Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km slolygon H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensitv Total for H 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score Is:_4-6 = H _1-3 = M _X< 1= L points = 2 points =1 poi nts = 0 points = (- 2) I Z o❑lnts = 0 Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priorlty habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 _ Site does not meet any of the criteria above — Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H _1= M X0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 U pints = 0 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number ;:A- I P u ( *:V I FN WDFW Priority Habitats Priorityb' • I by WDIM (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp- ltlil?'Lim : 'iv • •yyv ja Ali]ir�i i ilt}tif(1{}1 65 or access the list from here: Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0,4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: S21d-gro vIli we�t isf[Cascade crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age, lblature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p, 161 -see web linkabove). lnstream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: I lomogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (OAS - 2-0 m], composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. Maybe associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are �, 6.5 rt (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. 'ote: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 . k7ti r •.� +11.•"•+?. r �'' `jy ors+ IN ��lw-1• �': - { 1 r /yid'• '*: +.•~. �.++. =_-y ,hy� � �,'� ,qp ; �t ••yti 1� 4 1r.�'ai wy. • y� 4r ti � r a: LK 14 �_ Y . �� '7 i . - ^ a.`rt.T�','i- "�t�`r. �5� • �: ��i�' � . �,( it . , `.• � r� . y .5 - - - — .ti c`j`w7i' 1. �Y' 14 S►r {i� f7.��_ -�L��f�• j- �`yy�+L L� �` L[ �{��4 ti .'�' _ ti �'F _ `. 1.� 1`� 11�'�! [S�•!.1-11�`• ��rT ��}��: i, • • � rri �� C � •�� ! If � ��• • ��• - - -- -.--.`S}t'-Y�iTfif itir 41 rYh {. �•;:. r ! . ,t � .S'. �. �', r Y i+ �. �.�. �`-?�^'ter `;• ,T�i ti-.� `r�y i yy�•�• � � � �. �-i� � _ iii""-#•., ray �'. r� M +�. • `ram. 1ti !. y 'w_ �G��1 r � •ti • 't y *, Skl. y��A� .r• J�'," �-ram'•.'-��^ - +� - ;y /'}. f,.� w�71. rr'�s.. ;y���S.(>l�f' }:r���. �.., : } a �' .•�-y��_�- anti, � 5�:xw .- e • 11..�i''y+ ►! �zr :. St- `Z, *S7 �ar�- � -�• r.� i41-�i �. y t .�Y' i I!'w= ' '�y7,•' � f. .s ,y f f�. 'i~'�-„ �h v`'^.� 3 .�•S •,sir; �.}y; ,.f �•�_-.{f•+.a l :flit' ► fa7L, '�: `�1.�. "�' -. L . _ ! �,. 1j. > i +, " t } } tip :_ �• t. AlIk [� �r 4 .r ♦ - . ` �- .. AL- ,+ .. '�`�•• 1Y6- ��a 4-1 �r it ._!� '�.ti "�f." K .7:..nwl%�' •�`�.� ��.��T � 7 .I _ y .'trnf'i `Ni�}•• a "� - � �' 'i !ti , �+' 1,,•: '-+fir , ]':�:. �►�v. _ 1 •ram ry" jr� 1ti �� � L • r � 'l , . •�' •ti`. f ��� ���yw�` _� - rj; fit; -,.Ti� .`.�� •.�' .fit 7' • `�� r. _ .(i _ ,.�•_IR- . r_ �=�5 .-�. �' ,yam � - _ - r� f. ., . .• ,,.,,,. „ Jul :a �.r+ ' •T r � - ��}}�� t� �' 7 � .,;�� •; _ire 'f�� • - ,y;, - uj yr i1 ■ ' �`a cn Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) APPENDIX C REMAINING WETLANDS IN LAKEFRONT BLA Conditions Report 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix C J J J J J Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) APPENDIX C1 REMAINING WETLANDS IN LAKEFRONT BLA, WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2015 - 2017 Conditions Report 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix C1 It WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAt= 1572 City/County: Federal WayKnq County.Sampling Date:12/19/2015 Applicant/Owner: IRGNVeyerhauser State: WA Sampling Point: BA-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM. DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ,Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 8-101/o Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.309777 Long:-122.289189 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood ravel sand loam. 0-8% sta es NWI classification: PI-01PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing Sam ling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30) % Cover Skies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rub ra 20 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Pseudoisuga menziesii 15 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Thuja plicala 5 N FAC Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 40 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Gaultheria shallon 75 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Alnus rub ra 5 N FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 5 FAC species 30 x 3 = 90 80 = Total Cover FACU species 90 x 4 = 360 Herb Slratum (Plot size: 5) UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. Column Totals: 120 (A) 450 (B) 2. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.75 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 5 ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No E US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BA-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Cotar [moist] % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 211 100 Sandy loam Dic uina ai ound rocks 'Type: C=Concentralion. D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches) Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that aonl ) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) I ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (132) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (133) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: No indicators of wetland hydrology despite unusually wet conditions. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal Way/King County Sampling Date:12/1912015 Applicant/Owner: IRGNUeyerhauser State: WA Sampling Point: BA-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM. DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): De ressiona Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.309768 Long:-122.289239 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam. 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PFO/PSS _ Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling oint locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 1. Alnus rubs 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Alnus rubs 2. Spiraea douglasd 3. Rubus spectabilis 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratwn (Plot size: 30 1. 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 15 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 15 = Total Cover 45 Y FAC 40 Y FACW 5 N FAC 90 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply b : OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BA-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks 'Tvpe: C=Concentration. D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Cannot dig within the feature, soils look dark but disperses into the ponded water and turn to mud before they can be described. Indicators are assumed from strong hydrologic indicators. Soils too wet. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reouired: check all that apply) Seconds Indicators (2 or more re wired ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 8 Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes caoillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Unusually wet weather. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal Way/Kin County Sampling Date:1211912015 Applicant/Owner: IRGMteyerhauser State: WA Sampling Point: BB-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM, DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): epressional Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 1-2% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.309056 Long:-122.289374 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trey Stratum (Plot size: 30) % Cover Saecies_7 Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rub ra 50 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Populus bak"mifera 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 65 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Rubus spectabilis 45 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: MuItInly by-- 3.OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 0 x 2= a 5 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 45 = Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 2. 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <-3.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast- Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BB-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/2 100 Sandy loam 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (At) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Cannot pull sample because feature is completely under water, soil pit was dug where it was drier near the wetland boundary. Assumed hydric soils from strong hydrologic indicators. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators {2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 2 Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1-2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes cavillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 CitylCounty: Federal Way/King County Sampling Date*12/19/2015 Applicant/Owner: IRGMeyerhauser State: WA Sampling Point: 136-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM, DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21 N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2-3 Subregion (LRR): LRRRA Lat: 47.309067 Long:-122.289319 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood ravel sandy loam. 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important Teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: LO) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii 60 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. A/nus rubra 15 N FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. Acer circinatum 10 N FAC Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 85 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 (A/B) SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Acer circinatum 10 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: _ Multiply by: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 5 FAC species 37 x 3 = 111 10 = Total Cover FACU species 62 x 4 = 248 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. Polystichum mupifum 2 Y FACU Column Totals: 99 (A) 359 (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.63 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6 ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. _ ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 2 =Total Cover Wood Vine tratum (Plot size: 30 1 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 58-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 211 100 Sandy loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Despite a lack of a clean hydric soil indicator, this soil could be either. It was assumed not hydric based on the other two indicators. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (82) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes caoillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Hydrology indicator likely result of recent unusually wet weather; despite presence of saturation, this does not reflect wetland hydrology US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal Wayllting County Sampling Date:12119/2015 Applicant/Owner: IRG/We erhauser State: WA Sampling Point: BF-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM, DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2-3% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47,306097 Long:-'122.291842 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam. 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sa pling point locations, transects, important reatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree iraturn (Plot size: 30 1. Alnus rubs 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shruh Stratum (Plot size: 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. Sambucus racemosa 3. Oemleria cerasiformis 4. 5. tier Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover S en _sci ?_ Status Number of Dominant Species 35 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 35 = Total Cover 15 Y FAC 10 Y FACU 2 N FACU 27 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 1. Rubus armenlacus 45 Y FACU 2. Rubus ursinus 20 Y FACU 65 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Prevatence Indexworksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 50 x 3 = 150 FACU species 77 x 4 = 308 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 127 (A) 458 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.61 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BF-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/1 100 'Type: C=Concentration. D=DeDletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi!Is': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 7 Secondary Indicators (2 or mare required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Test pit very close to the lake which is at high water mark, higher elevation levels than usual US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal WaylKing County Sampling Date:1211912015 Applicant/Owner: IRGAIVe erhauser State: WA Sampling Point: BF-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2-3% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.306041 Long:-122.291842 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam. 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ showinci sampling point VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ etc. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Straium (Plot size: 30ft % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 60 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 2. 3. 4. 60 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 20 Y FAC 2. Malus fusca 10 Y FACW 3. 4. 5. 30 = Total Cover Hero Stfatuc(Plot size: 1. Ranunculus repens 60 Y FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 60 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft 1. 2. 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by! OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Testis >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BF-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 3/1 100 Sandy loam 4-12 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam 12-14 10YR 7/2 45 GLEY1 10Y 5/1 40 D M Sandy harn_ 10YR 5/8 15 D M Sandy loam 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ® Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima Indicators minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (611) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes capillary fringe Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal Way/King County Sampling Date:1211912015) Applicant/Owner: IRG/Vdeyerhauser State: WA Sampling Point: BF-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2-3% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.306097 Long:-122.291842 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam. 0-8%slopes NWI classification: PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ED Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree stratum (Plot size: 30) % Cover Species? Status 1. Alnus rtdbra 35 Y FAC 2_ 3. 4. Sa tin /Shnab Stratum (Plot size: 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. Sambucus racemosa 3. Oemleria cerasifwnis 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 35 = Total Cover 15 Y FAC 10 Y FACU 2 N FACU 27 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover 1. Rubus armeniacus 45 Y FACU 2. Rubus ursinus 20 Y FACU 65 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Prevalence Indexworks Ineet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 50 x 3 = 150 FACU species 77 x 4 = 308 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 127 (A) 458 (e) Prevalence Index = B/A = 361 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ED US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BF-UPL7 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 3/1 100 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand G Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ❑ Histosol (All) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY `Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima Indicators minimum of one re uireds check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (All) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: i Secondary Indicators (2 or more reoulred) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 7 Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ _(includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Test pit very close to the lake which is than usual US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal a /Kin County Sampling Date:12/1912015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: CB-UPi_1 Investigator(s): JMM. DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2-5% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Aldenvood gravel sandy loam 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling paint locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. Pseudotsuga menziesd 2. Thuja p/icafa 3. Alnus ruhra 4. Sapling/Shru_b_Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Acer circina[um 2. 3. 4. _ 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. Polystichum munitum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 40 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 5 N FAC Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 60 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) 40 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Muftlnly by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 60 x 3 = 180 40 = Total Cover FACU species 90 x 4 = 360 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 50 Y FACU Column Totals: 150 (A) 540 (B) 50 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 50 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Prevalence Index = B/A = 3_6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CB-OP1.1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-2 10YR 4-2 100 Silt loam 2-16 7.5YR 4/4 100 Silt loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Unino, V,M Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (All) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reciU go; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indicators f2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if Remarks: No indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser CitylCounty: Federal Way/King County Sampling Date:1212212015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: CB-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM. DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslo a Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-3 Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.304053 Long:-122.293896 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam. 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important reatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ° Cover 3oecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 40 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Fraxinius latifolia 15 Y FACW Total Number of Dominant 3, Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 55 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1 None Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: MUI ipiy by: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 5 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 0 = Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4= 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. None Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 2. 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CB-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' LocZ Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Stream substrate within the braided channels made acquiring a soil sample difficult. Soils that were identified were a 2/1 sandy loam but could not dig very deep. Assumed hydric from strong hydrologic indicators. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary_ Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ® Geomorphic Position (D2) ® Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 4-6 Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available. Remarks: Braided channels US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WavlKing County Sampling Date:12/1912015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: CD-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM. DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): non Slope (%): 2-5% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.310362 Long:-122.288643 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam 0-8% slo es NWI classification: PFO/PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, im oriant Teatures, exc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No M Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii_ 2. Thuja plicata 3. 4. Absolute Dominant Indicator o Cover Species? Status 50 Y FACU 15 Y FAC 65 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Gaultheria shallop 80 Y FACU 2. Thuja plicata 10 N FAC 3. Ilex aquitcliurn 1 N FACU 4. Arbutus menziesii 1 N NL 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 92 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of, Multi by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 25 x 3 = 75 FACU species 133 x 4 = 532 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 158 (A) 607 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.84 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. Rubus arrneniacus 2 Y FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 Remarks: Mountain beaver burrows present 2 = Total Cover % Cover of Biotic Crust Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CD-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoO Texture Remarks 0-2 10YR 211 100 Silt loam 2-8 7.5YR 4/4 100 Silt loam 8-10 10YR 2/1 100 Silt loam 10-16+ 7.5YR 4/6 100 Silt loam 'T e: C=Concentration. D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (176) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary- Indicators_lminimum of one required; check _all _that apply_) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes ca illary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/King Countv Sampling Date:12/1912015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: CD-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.310326 Long-122.288310 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PFO/PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transecrs, imporeant reatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15) 1. A/nus rubra 2. Rubus speclabifis 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) 1. Nome 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 10 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 10 = Total Cover 60 Y FAC 40 Y FAC 100 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Mountain beaver burrows inside feature Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B) Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B} Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CD-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 2/1 100 Silt loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Hydric indicators assumed, as hydrologic indicators are strong. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 a more feauired) ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1-2 Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 2 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes ca illary fringe) _ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: 'fAL-1572 City/County: Federal WaylkSinCounty Sampling Date:1211912015 Applicant/Owner: IRGNVeyerhauser State: WA Sampling Point: CG-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM DRT Section, Township, Range: 9j15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 5-15% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47,309619 Long:-122.289989 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam, 0-8% Slopes NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: LO) N Cover Species? Status 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii 45 Y FACU 2. Thuja plicata 30 Y FAC 3. Acer macrophyflum 15 N FACU 4. 90 = Total Cover Wiling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 1. Alnus rudra 10 Y FAC Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: Mulsiply by: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 5 FAC species 40 x 3 = 120 10 = Total Cover FACU species 160 x 4 = 640 Herb Stratum (Plot size: UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. Hedera helix 75 Y FACU Column Totals: 200 (A) 760 (B) 2. Polystichum n7unitu 15 N FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = 3_8 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 5 ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 90 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 1. Rubus ursfnus 10 Y FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 10 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CG-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 4/2 100 4-10 10YR 4/3 100 Loam Loam Cobbles. hard to dia further 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ❑ Histosol (At) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ 2 cm Muck (At0) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Indicators - Primary Indicators fminimum of one re fired: check all that aural) Secondary Indicators f2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 4B)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (611) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: TAL-1572 City/County: Federal Woy/King County Sampling Date:12/1912015 Applicant/Owner: IRG/Weyerhauser State: WA Sampling Point: CG-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21 N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none). Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47,309319 Long:-122290246 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam 0-8% slopes NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling oint locations, transects, important Teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: LO) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Thuja plicala 60 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 60 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. Rubus spectabilis 20 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 Total % Cover of Multiply by: 3 OBL species 0 x 1= 0 4 FACW species 0 x 2= Q 5 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 20 = Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 2. 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 E Dominance Testis >50% 5 ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CG-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Feature under 18 inches of water, soils were unable to be dug up but assumed hydric from hydrologic indicators HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more reggiredl ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 18 Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WgylKing Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: PG-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslove Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1-2 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.304224 Long:-122.293305 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Aldenvood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important Teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft % Cover ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. A/nus rub ra 25 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Populus balsamifera 5 N FAC Total Number of Dominant 3, Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 30 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Saplin0hrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabllls 80 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2 Total % Cover of: Multi I by: 3 OBL species x 1 = 4 FACW species x 2 = 5 FAC species x 3 = 80 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: Lft) UPL species x 5 = 1. None Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% 5 ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 6 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 7 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8. El Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 =Total Cover Woody Vine Slratucn (Plot size: 15ft Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1. None be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: GB-WETi Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % ColOrlmoist) % Tvoe' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 3/1 100 Loam 6-8 10YR 4/1 100 SiL 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators fminimum of one required: check all that apj2jy) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ® Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 46)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 6-8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/ling Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: PG-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N R4E Landform (hillsiope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 3-5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.305356 Long:-122.292863 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sa Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft 1. A/nus rubra 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: j_Lft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. Polystichum munitum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: jAft 1. None 2. int Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No etc. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: !6 Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 70 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 70 = Total Cover 40 Y FAC = Total Cover 40 70 Y FACU 70 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °I Cover of- Mulfiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species 110 x 3 = 330 FACU species 70 x 4 = 280 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 180 (A) 610 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.39 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: PG-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-9 10YR 3/1 100 SiL 9-13 10YR 411 100 No redox 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hvdroloav Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reauired: check all that aoDly) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment �j (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report I 1 I J J li 1 J J APPENDIX C2 REMAINING WETLANDS IN LAKEFRONT BLA, WETLAND RATING FORMS WITH FIGURES, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2018 20 April 2018 Copyright © 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix C2 J Wetland name or number eik 2- RATING SUMMARY -Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): �- �FJ _ Date of site visit: I�IQ�ig Rated by �ria�-� hoc- date Trained by Ecology? j Yes _No Date of training4l� HGM Class used for rating t�i cl Wetland has multiple HGM classes? Y XN NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY I[ (based on functions —%or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 ,—Category III —Total score = 16 -19 Category IV — Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H L H Imo• L H NI L Landscape Potential H L H L H M Value H M L H M L H (D L Score Based on Ratings TOTAL l� 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4= M,L,L 3 = L, L, L Wetland name or number PA") - Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes D 1.3. H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperlods D 1.4, H 1.2 Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) D 2.2, D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including Polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 Screen Capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Mao of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hvdroperiods H 1.2 Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to anotherfigure) R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA In which unit is found (from web) R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland {can be added to anotherfigure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge -including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) L 3.1, L 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants S 1.3 Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (con be added to figure above) S 4.1 Boundary of 150 ft buffer (can be added to another figure) S 2.1, 5 5.1 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(1) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) S 3.1, 5 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) 53.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2019 Wetland name or number2L2 HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? 1�)g go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms far Riverine wetlands. !fit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO Ogo to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats our wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; —At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). (09 go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? ,_The wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a Swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded, NO go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually E3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number �� ��TTE: go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are fllled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 CES-)he wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland i Treat as I ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number BOL DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATSMETLAiNDS Water Quality Functions - indicators that the -site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Cirarocteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland; Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that Is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUE MON 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. paints = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff Ia er is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. CEtoracteristics anti distribution of ersistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardln classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area paints = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y. of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants >'/,a of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <'/lo of area points = 0 D 1.4. cilaracteristics of seasonal ondin or inunda -' This is the area that is paraded far of least 2 months. See descriptlon in manual, Area seasonally ponded is >'/: total area of wetland Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland Area seasonally ponded is < Y total area of wetland Total for D 1 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H — S points = 4 q points = 2 uotnts = 0 Add the points in the boxes above I 11= M 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 or 4 = H _%.1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on me jrrsr page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 ml) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2, Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin In which the unit Is found)? _ Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H _1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 R O, Wetland name or number 9)A9% DEPRESSIDNAL AND. FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic. Functions - Indicators that the site functions. to, reduce flooding and stream Aegradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1, Characteristics of surface water outflows frorn the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstrlcted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that Is permanently flowing points = 0 _ D 4.2. Depth of storagg during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland Is In the Flats class paints = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6.11 = M —0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 259/.of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 C� Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above j Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H '2C 1 or 2 = M ___,0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 61. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding roblems, Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the lilghest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient, points= 1 I Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin, points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2, Has the site been Identified as Important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? �( Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H_ 1 = M _ 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number %2 These questions apply to wetlands of aII.HGM classes.. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indjcators that site functions to: provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes In the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined foreach class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 ! Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 I Forested (areas where trees haven 30% cover) 1 structure: points - 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if., .The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2, Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see text for descriptlons of hydroperiods). _ Permanently flooded or Inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 ,Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species In the wetland that cover at least 10 W. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether Interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can Include open water or mudflats) Is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (D (: a ) (*) ( a ) 0 - Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points None - 0 points All three diagrams :•; ° }` ., in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number V/)— 2 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Chock the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. -,- urge, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 41n diameter and 6 ft long). ,,,,,_Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) f _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) ^4t least ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above �? Rating of Site Potential If score is:_35-18 = H --7_ 1-14 = M `_�_C 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ ((% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)— If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat In 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)—= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon Is high intensity land use points = (- 2) ` 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high Intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H ^1-3 = M �< 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state orfederal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, In a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above Rating of Value If score Is:_2 = H _�yj = M —,,,0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 =0 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or numberW_ WDFW Priority Habitats I'doll ly habit is listed Uw WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List, Olympia, Washington. 177 pp, j]Lj1;,(jwdfw.wj.eny�salCii or access the list from here: tt ;1 'W ! i++ Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Bladiversity Areas and Corridors., Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions In WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests:Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi layered ranol:y with occasional small openings; with at least B trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) a 32 in (81 cm) dbh or �- 200 years of age. JOture forests -- Stands with average diameters exceeding; 21 in (53 cm) dbli: crown cover may be less titan 100syu; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PNS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PNS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. Maybe associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are bead or dying and exhibit sufficient decry charactcrlstics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) ill western Washington and are n 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are a 12 in (30 cm In diameter at the largest end, and n 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number C8 RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): CB -1-ft-1572- Date of site visit: 12- ��f 1 Rated by � •Hc rr7 p�'�- jX f Trained by Ecofogy? Yes ^No Date of training V �15~ HGM Class used for rating iolna. Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY a (based on €unctions, or special characteristics�j 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category 11—Total score = 20 - 22 _Category III —Total score =16 - 19 Category IV —Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H L H L H L Landscape Potential F L H L H M L Value M L H L H L TOTAL Score Based on ;I� M Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog 1 Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon [ II I II III IV Interdunal None of the above Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H, H, L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M, M, M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 11 Wetland name or number S- Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for -T Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4 D 1.4, H 1.2 Hydroperiods Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) D 2.2, D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - Including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 D 3.1, D 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Ponded depressions _ R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfrgure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to another_figure) R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (cart be added to another gore) L 2.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) L 3.1, L 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit Is found (from web) L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1. H 1.4 Hydroperlods H 1.2 Plant cover of densetreek shrubs, and herbaceous plants _ Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (can be added to figure above) S 1.3 S 4.1 Boundary of 150 ft buffer (can be added to another figure) S 2.1, S 5.1 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) S 3.1, 5 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which,unit is found (from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 201S Wetland name or number -L. b, HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply; and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand]? _t `t Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe 1j`� r�crr wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. Vul go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats tr wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; .At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). j N(7_11 go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), _The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, _The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. (N ( I) go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, _The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number C-P NO go to b YES - The wetland class is Riverine 'NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES)-I'he wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet NO - go to S YES - The wetland class is Depressional B. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a rverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use In rating Slope + Riverine _ Slope + Depressional Riverine _ Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number _�6 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS I Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions -to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving It (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that Is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff laver) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3, Characteristics and distribution of oncsistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > X of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal oondine or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < X total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-26 = H _)L6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 I D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = O , D 2.4. Are there th sources a pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? source Q - �D Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-Y- 3 or 4 = H A 1 or 2 = M �0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 f D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES If there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score Is; %C2-0 = H -1= M �0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number DERRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an Intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints= 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. De th of story a durin wet er�3 io&i Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 In) _ points = 0 5 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetiand to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 2 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 J The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6.11 = M ^0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Z Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H V1 or 2 = M —0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landsca P a that has IIorsdin oroblems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being toted. Do not add paints. Choose rlie Ili Hesr score if npore rhon one condition is nrrr. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient Into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why _. points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score Is:-2-4 = H X .i = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 0 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number Lb These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y. ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 _ . Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 if the unit has a Forested class, check If.- _,The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water reglmes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 ' Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 _�� Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Z _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 W'. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian milfoll, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 e 5 species - points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (:0) None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row �• are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 za Wetland name or number H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. ✓ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 In) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cutshrubs or trees that have not yet weathered /vhcre wood is exposed) ✓ At least '% ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) 1% Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see )4 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above In Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _10-14 = M 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_ + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/21_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10%of 1 km PolvAon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat In 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon Is high intensity land use 5 50% of 1 km Polygon Is high intensity Total for H 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is._" = H _1-3 = M _ �< 1= L points = 2 ! points =1 points = 0 points = (- 2) "Z points = 0 Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the /+rst page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an Individual WDFW priority species — It Is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, In a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above oin�l< Rating of Value If score is:-2 = H _ .-I = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 4 WDFW Priority Habitats i'riI)1ily hoh4;its listed III• WD.ElL (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. hB.p;//tivdl'w.wa.gov/u�shlieatir>i�s ji}t}i [i5/w[i!'�t 11f} Ei;S,htli or access the list from here: ll r ;I,g +v sl ti '!'V'i n ] � t ' •yl Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -growth wcst of Cascade crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page), — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 _rZ 4-0 LLI It or d ' w! did , . � ,;'.L._- � � • � F""��[ low- ylie- µ'•'•Sr ! F-�� r�►.. " 4--f 4 ,Z .fir r L= • x .*" jco jk i 14 Ly uR f ` a �ryy.i is . 1.6 zp Alp f Irr'P I IS A It wl ma t I � _ -.. •�: } + ! ` ; _.! { 1 O fF1�R. +* ' �'��;ti ' girl► Wetland name or number C-& RATING SUMMARY —Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID Date of site visit: ''R/15 r Rated by c,.i Trained by Ecology?_K Yes No Date of training �` f�� HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?—Y X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY IV (based on functions= or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I -Total score- 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III -Total score = 16 -19 �( Category IV - Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat 1 Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings ,ite Potential f H Cr L H L H M L ,andscape Potential H M H M H M Value M L H M L H M L TOTAL core Based on tatings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = LLL Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number C. G- Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods D 1.4, H 1.2 Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) D 2.2, D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 H 1.2 Hydroperiods Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to anotherfigure) R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) I R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to anotherfigure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) L 3.1, L 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) L 3.3 Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants S 1.3 Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (can be added to figure above) S 4.1 Boundary of 150 ft buffer (can be added to another figure) S 2.1, S 5.1 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) S 3.1, S 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number Ccr_ HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? C - go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. {�V 00 ) go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). r ,`N 0 � go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a Swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. bNOgo to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? ._,The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number CG V0N-go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine TE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 � YES The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number r _ DEPRESSI0NAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality"'Tunctions - indir ators that.the site functions:to1improve-water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface (or duff layej is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of peEEjEtent lants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants >'/l0 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal Ponding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y2 total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11= M ^0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 (f} D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes =1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H _1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 (� D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? _ Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:y2-4 = H _1 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 5 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number GC"' DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce floodingand,strearn degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is SO to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above 1 d Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 'Y�,641 = M 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is; _3 = H _1 or 2 = M Y.-0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O (�J Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: _2-4 = H �1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 0 Wetland name or number G" These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 �•y� Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if. The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20%within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally Flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name „[ the species. Do not include Eurasian milfail, reed canarygrass, purple laosestrife, Canadian thistle (� If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you hove four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating Is always high. 1 (:: ) (*) None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number C&S H I.S. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above I 3 1 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M -X-0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 I 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) .� <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M �< 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location.for an individual WDFW priority species I — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H 1 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or numbercGr- WDFW Priority Habitats Priprity habitat-q listed) --*W (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. -1 177 pp. �f Iwdfw.w�igo�r�j�llbllCRtk4n tJ0J6Uwdfw001 U.pl or access the list from here: hrr�,-llwdfw.�ti+a.i;nvLrm�scrvationl,.pllsllissl) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is - independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat 1 — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). -� — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. I — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-g1•owth west of'Cascade-f[_e.t - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 j years of age. Mature forests -Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover maybe less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide j functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. ` J Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. j Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numbers (�_ _ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the category..when th& a m mate• criterla. ore.met. SC 1.0. Estuarine wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? — The dominant water regime is tidal, — Vegetated, and — With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt Yes -Go to SC 1.1 No= Not an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? Yes = Category I No - Go to SC 1.2 Cat. I SC 1.2. Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Spartina, see page 25) Cat. I —At least 3/ of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. Cat. II —The wetland has at least two of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Yes = Category I No = Category II SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) SC 2.1. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of High Conservation Value? Yes - Go to SC 2.2 No - Go to SC 2.3 Cat. 1 SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? Yes = Category I No = Not a WHCV SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? http://wwwI.dnr.wa.gov/nhy/refdesk/datasearch/wnh wetlands. df Yes - Contact WNHP/WDNR and go to SC 2.4 No = Not a WHCV SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on their website? Yes = Category I No = Not a WHCV SC 3.0. Bogs Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below. If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons, either peats or mucks, that compose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No - Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks, that are less than 16 in deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on top of a lake or pond? Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No = Is not a bog SC 3.3. Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? Yes = Is a Category I bog No - Go to SC 3.4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory, you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present, the wetland is a bog. Cat. I SC 3.4. Is an area with peats or mucks forested (> 30% cover) with Sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce, or western white pine, AND any of the species (or combination of species) listed in Table 4 provide more than 30% of the cover under the canopy? Yes = Is a Category I bog No = Is not a bog Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 16 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numberc-c7'_ SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands Does the wetland have at least 1 contiguous acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. — Old -growth forests (west of Cascade crest): Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 in (81 cm) or more. — Mature forests (west of the Cascade Crest): Stands where the largest trees are 80- 200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an average diameter (dbh) exceeding 21 in (53 cm). Yes = Category I No = Not a forested wetland for this section Cat. I SC 5.0. Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? — The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks —The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) Cat. I Yes - Go to SC 5.1 No = Not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less Cat. II than 20% cover of aggressive, opportunistic plant species (see list of species on p.100). —At least'/ of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland is larger than'/lo ac (4350 ft2) Yes = Category I No = Category II SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its habitat functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: — Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103 Cat I — Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105 — Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 Yes - Go to SC 6.1 No = not an interdunal wetland for rating SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form (rates H,H,H or H,H,M Cat. II for the three aspects of function)? Yes = Category I No - Go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger? Cat. III Yes = Category 11 No - Go to SC 6.3 SC 6.3. Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac? Yes = Category III No = Category IV Cat. IV Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics If you answered No for all types, enter "Not Applicable" on Summary Form Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 17 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number • Pk RATIINIG SlrWIVIARY —Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): __ P K 'A-NL-15 -a Date of site visit: "NIg(Ig Rated bye• err; ���"re ��dc. (e Trained by Ecology?l Yes _No Date of training` tj HGM Class used for ratingWetland has multiple HGM classes?iY X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY -L (based on functions-yorspecial characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score =16 - 19 Category IV — Tota I score = 9 -15 FUNCTION I Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H M L H L H L Landscape Potential H L H L H M Value H M L H M L H (D L TOTAL Score Based on Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon [ II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7=H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L, L, L 1 Wetland name or number - "- Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes D 1.3. H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods D 1.4, H 1.2 Location of outlet Scan be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) D 2.2, D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - IncludIng H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 Screen capture of list of IMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: Cowardin plant classes Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland {can be added to anotherriyi 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology websil Screen capture of list of TN4DLs for WRIA in which unit Is found (from web) Slope Wetlands Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 To answer questions: L 1. 1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 L 1.2 L 2.2 H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 L 3.1, L 3.2 L 3.3 Figure # Wetland name or number PK HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question S. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? NO go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NV001ir go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (S ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). bogo to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? .The wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. (:N"50go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, `The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number PK tm: o to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -- go to 7 CES he wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no riverbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a rverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Depressional Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number rk ❑EPRESS10NAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the.site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an Intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. fl points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland Is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. the soil 2 in below the surface for duff layerl is true clay or true organic (use MRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 ( � D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent alanrs (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardln classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y. of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/jo of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/io of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal ponding�or inund tion: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual, Area seasonally ponded is > X total area of wetland points = 4 1 Area seasonally ponded is > Y. total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11 = M 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other source of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-0 2.3? Source 5)"Aroo'j Yes = 1 No = 0 / 1 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Z. Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H _)(1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3,1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 ml) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 f (Q D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as Important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit Isfound)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points In the boxes above Z Rating of Value If score is: ": 2-4 = H _3 = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number. PK DEPRESS1DNAL AND FIATS WETLANDS . Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4. 1, Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints= 2 05 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points= 0 D 4.2, 0egth 0 storage during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points . 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points= 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 In) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribu i n of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points= 0 Entire wetland is In the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6.11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above j Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H Y,1 or 2 = M _ _ 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. ThC unit is in a landsca a that has flooding roblems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points, C1:oose rile Ig hest score i (note than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs In a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 ■ Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 } Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin, points = 1 f The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland, points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:_2-4 = H 7 i = M ,_0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 6 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number P K- These questions apply to wetlar+ds of all HGM classes. HABITAfi';FUNCTIONS.,:-,Indlcators that site functions to -pro vide Important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes In the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of X ac or more than 105V. of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _ _Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: "A -The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polvgan H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y. ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 _Permanently Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1-1:1 } Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species In the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle I If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can Include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. Moderate = 2 one = 0 oints Low = 1 oint points N p p u AFr All three diagrams In this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number. rk- H I.S. Special habitat features: Chark the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. ;Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 In diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (strucrures for egg -laying by amphibions) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of straiol 7 Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _ , 7-14 = M 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit) Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)— If total accessible habitat Is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Pulygan points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 f Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 30-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use —< 50% of 1 km Polygon is high Intensity Total for H 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is- 4.6= H _1-3 = M < 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to soclety? points = (- 2) 1-2 points = 0 Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened cr Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state orfederal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined bythe Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does no: meet any of the Rating of Value If score Is:-2 = H ,t1nve =M 0 = L nts = 0 Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A To A'DFW Priority Habitats ,i. „jtX Ilabitils 11sted , (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be lound, n: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. ❑lynipia, Washington. I77 pp. littlp 1/w(ljL .V-, enl!/') 1 IILC,aC' 11 f 5 w -i, Hff or access the list from here: 1]liTl 1!►a '�v. i�t�rlrrntserv+ t[it�ttyllslLOL%Y) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: flltl-gro y-Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming multl- layered canopy with occasional small openisfgs; with at least 8trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (01 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age. J+=;Ea forests- Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less titan 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is genet ally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak oroak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component Is important (full clescf'iptions in WDFW PHS report P.156 -see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other, — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearsbore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Neat -shore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound i~earshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relativey undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags If they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags leave a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 rrrn) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and a 20 ft (6 m) long. (Vote: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Z N w C O N U) cB 00 0 N O N 4 70 O 6 FD 70 en cB LU U c cB Qi T (B cB O N LL O _a U a> C ca Cl) Q O U a.� c 0 U L CD O O J- J L Cc w _W U) O Q 0 to • � + CL * l co O_ _ a� ..., r O W - LL Ucop p�. _ ''e .. `fir {p{��•� � r _ � t - r!3 f. 40 FSLrr ' " e �s- IL • ; _r r now �.�' "/� � "'• %mil t.A� � � Y " ~ I► mot. ♦ ..: : [ 4}y� t � � t. V'• � `its 't .� ".��� cc ui ol aw 1 Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) APPENDIX D FEATURE SUMMARY TABLE, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2018 Existing Conditions 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix D LU J Q CQ G U) LU w LU LL m bf m H O LL w Y Q J w J Z w LU c� d 7 U = O C0 D U) N O O IT co LL Ci m = N N L) u) O O O O O O N LL d d LL CD N O n f,- In C.7 O LSD O N U')COj CV)0 O CND O tl0 O In CV m 000 O co CD N N N Ce) O 1-tLf) M IN N Q cn 'O C m d !�6 00 V) _ CD 00i 1M OO coc Ln co CEO � � 0 C j ` O O O O O cM O O O O O O O fD O v N O O O O Q !0 C G1 E G N O 2 I m LLv > C V W m U O 0 V G! _ Cn �LL0 r 0 �� r � r 1m N U p o 0 0 o o c o 0 m fn � CD o a) 0 W 0 m o y LL• d co = a a a a cq cA m cn a m C m CO C O U)O CO a 2 O U) U)O C/) O O V m ; CL a a 0 a CL EL a m 0 d m 0ILL EL o a� c m m c �D Cy x o o 4) g - - rn Y � d CL '> = d Q v c J X x X m v m W_ w C N C'7 JCV M �N-jCV CM r A LL LL LL g LL LL ILL. g : g LL LL LL LL LU a LL- m m m LL O J C «t Q N m W LL Y J m ❑ 0 Y In Z T �O. LL J lL L) m m m ? m m m m U U U W?� LL Q a m N m v Cn co r- o0 C) O -- c W J m a N LIJ w D a W LL I ie Z O LL W Y Q J W z J Z W w ♦ V U w m = O CO O CO O O O m O v O v O v O v O 0 LL U m T = N � L N CD O O 0 0 3: Lo LL d d G1N O O P- ci O � O T C N 0) N v(0M I lC) N N C a CO 00 O co N I- CO O CA Cn t` Cn Cn O O CO 00 M CO CA O N — CO It CO — M v y C!O O v O M O It O O — O v — O O O O O N O O O P- N GQ o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 zL) E N Oho c rncc > c U `� w v v IT M M Cl) M v LL � r a 0 — — — — — cc N U c f0 c N c f6 c f6 c f0 c f6 c f6 c O �+ _ co O_ O O O N O N O y Cc (7 = w O O rn O rn rn rn 00 _ O O O n a65 a a a a a � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 m U c Cn m m CO CO eca a U) U) a a 2 O 3 O a O O a O a a a a a 0 U LLa LL LL LL r � a cc d J C 7 = 2 J m L a s p a �vm x X x X w x X x X X X x X X m x U y c d M J i M i M i Cl) J i LLI c) M i Cl) M i M i M i M i M i M i V N N O N N J N N N N N N N N N ;� a �g �g egg �;, 3 g 3 g g g g g 0 m m m m a m m m m m m m m m O J C� J J m M L t 3 �+ = to J V Z Y J 0 Z m J U Q Q Q m m a a Q Q Q Q 1i a o a o a a a m a m a Cl) It Lr) CO r- CO O O N /J1 W Q D w w LL J m F— z w LL LU Y Q J Z J Z LU 'W^ V d c> � � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL V m a = N M L o o O �: u) LL d N L. - - O N � - N N M M f M y l6 3 O � N N N l0 N N tr N a C R r O O CO 00 N f- t0 00 O v v 00 V N 0 N to co 00 ti N 00 M O O M — w CD M ` M o O It O U') O o O 0)0 v O o O It It O o O 0 O 0 O 0 O o O O O R r � c m E C N O o z CD d — M LL � C W M � V +cc O M M M M Cl) CO M M M M M co a+ c6 N d LL It _ Lu Ir. O tm ai = _ _ - - - - - - w4 y � = — — o N V f6 f6 f6 f6 f6 f6 O <6 O O O O uJ O N O y O N N _ J5 Fn a a 0 m 0 a a O (n O 65 O cn O 05 O fn O (n O m ~ N N N N N N N U m 0 W m U) O O O O 3 O m a w a w a w LL LL a LL a LL d LL a w a w a w a w LL w LL w m w a O U z a Z a� m 3 o O 3 w Y a> QQ c J Z X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X m ~gym L) 2 N W M M M i M i M i CO CO i M i M Cl) M i M i co i C v i N i N N N N N N N N N N N N p M - �i g g g g g g g g g g g g g m v a N _ m m m m m m m m m m m m m O J Q J m L m r� V Z m m m � ❑ ❑ ❑ � Y Y Y Y Y Y Y LL a ❑ fn a m m N N N co N N N M M CNM M M M fU M `m O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ro LLU m N C.) N Q d' -- N LL d d LL mN m (D U) U.) CO O Ln �- I00 T 00 0) co L Lr) N IT N N C4 W N f) .0 C 10 r p) �p O — M O M O a w (D 0 00 M M O N 1-0 0M In h — (D I� Co m M O O O O M O O O O O 0 O N O O O O O — O O O O O O O — O In O G ram+ C C N C m o t O N LL C W m U R V M CM co co M co M co M CMuj M M M M O M O 0) ° et N > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = O � � N Ci f6 C 41 m 0) a 0) a N a N a 0) a N D_ (D a N n 0) a N a 0) a N D_ N D_ N 0. O y C9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w = cn U) U) U) U) U) w w w w w w w w a tq A (D � V � !C6 C W () p W a W M W m W m W a W a W a W M W W W W W W U) a ( c Z a a a a a a U Z U W W LL x x x x x x x x x x x x O o x C 7 C m m Z 7 ; d W W ,may = a aviUm V X X mw H CO) in y W M N M N W — M — M — M — M M M M c- M .- M M M M Z C ` a Cl) g g g g g g g g g g g g g g W Y cc JQ m m m m m m m m m m m m m m w m � m W o to C �' J V Y J V a Q Q ¢ Q Q Y Y Y Y Y Y ) N m w Y Y LL LL Q Q LL o a a O co M M M � IT v I v v � v I r k \� 2U 2 L BN k �U) L� LL n ■ � 0-0 � U) 2 2 k C - 2 @ k G cc 2 2 a d � k § NEcn B£ 2 U. 7 U _ w _ �U c @ o n n ■ kE e$ 0 CD o 0) _ k d § k k co\ 0 cl 2 U § CL J _ w w LL a o �2 c 2 2 kV 2 Z_ § k ` ■ � @ �Dco CO) � 2 n & n & § $ e w § � IL uiLU / CO) a e O_ 5 Usk \ U 0 I I I I I J J J Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) Existing Conditions Report APPENDIX E PHOTODOCUMENT, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2017 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix E Federal Way Campus, LLC Existing Conditions Report The following is a compilation of photos taken between December 2015 and May of 2016 by employees of Talasaea Consultants on various site visits. Wetlands delineated on -site were part of a larger effort to document all wetlands found throughout the Federal Way Campus, LLC property in Federal Way (formerly owned by Weyerhaeuser), which explains the irregular wetland labels. Included in this photodocument are photos of typical wetland vegetation, typical coniferous and deciduous upland, and gravel access roads throughout the site. 26 January 2017 Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 1 Federal Way Campus, LLC Existing Conditions Report 1 Typical Herbaceous Wetland (Photo 1) Photo 1. Typical herbaceous wetland — salmonberry, Himalayan blackberry, red alder, reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup. J J 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 2 J Federal Way Campus, LLC E 5E 90 120' 150 e: Existing Conditions -122-29.9367 �} Photo 4. Typical salmonberry wetland with European Ash planted in rows. 26 January 2017 Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 4 Federal Way Campus, LLC Existing Conditions Report Typical Open Field (Photos 5 — 7) Photo 5. Panorama of open field from the east side. Photo 6. Typical emergent wetland vegetation within the open field. 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 5 Federal Way Campus, LLC Existing Conditions Report • � 4 y� f• I.�•r� `1.. ti .���.- - ','e fir, .. - - - 1 �%•A"r,�• — r pf�•. • — •Jj `9 log �' Je r�L Photo 7. Typical wetland vegetation within open field. 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 6 Federal Way Campus, LLC Existing Conditions Report Stream Channel (Photos 8 — 9) f� _ r� ��s" ��i:_ • :ate t•'•. �.. '' _ _ 1 t'' •!,�� •' '1L �, v�\. '�a',��•��h=.+-F �.j�$�i 'F yi ri' A: "� �.�Y l'� •- � � ,` �'ti'E�'t q •qi � � 1; ,� K: is _ • � � .� _ ". Photo 8. Stream channel looking north from the access road. a ' x.'s: . - � �� �' -` fig• �.. mot.. 1" ;.a•�SN f'� Photo 9. Stream channel looking south from the access road. 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 7 Federal Way Campus, LLC Existing Conditions Report Stormwater (Photo 10) LAT: 47.304149 LON.-122.298487 Photo 10. Stormwater pond located on site. 26 January 2017 Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 8 F3.�, •.ems+.. -s• rr�T'':=, f #�"�, r s �' . f -. IJM NP ._�•+ �r '' �-. !' •�` '�'' .�_'r rye: .a �' �ti ' S 7i,Ao •--^,- .� Yy- a. i,�-.r_ a .`' 06 ol �f_!• y4 "pIL _ try • i*��. s ' '� �• . .. c� � =fir �.wl�; .. � � - '`. • +fir' ' _ fi � _ - .;^.Y •. .a - - �—,�"�- �� i 4. L 1:1 1i ,M I J J J Lakefront Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels F, J, L, BLA 2-3, and BLA 3-1) APPENDIX F Conditions Report EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHEETS Sheet W1.0. Existing Conditions Overview Plan & Sheet Key Sheet W1.1. Existing Conditions Plan Sheet W1.2. Existing Conditions Plan Sheet W1.3. Existing Conditions Plan Sheet W1.4. Existing Conditions Plan 20 April 2018 Copyright© 2018 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572 Lakefront BLA Ex Conditions Report (4-2018).docx Appendix F i! 4) CI . 1 7 O 4j N N T C • -i O- $ S i G -)' 4- 10 •'1 C O> O) T $4 N 4) C >1 7 T •.-1 0) > - m HY .i •r1 m C C NL >+L m m O 4-) 4- m m u) m ):• " C 7 U H L •r1 m � 4J 4-) a 3 U U a O W •r1 U) Q ? O O1 •r1 O m •r1 m L a • 1 f4 cn E N C L L O > __ - '`_ 4- 41 N 3 L> > N N E N t N m O a-) a.) 4•) O 14 m a.) m O C� Q L U O a.) -0H t0 ••1 \ 0O LJ �i.y m LT N NC3U OOO N •1 :3 E j M U 7_j NL N4__L L Q) Um W-0 H P+) 3 cn N4.3 A: 04) P M O C 4-3L 04-) 4-3 E ^N am N NL 4J N to H m 0) • 1� O •• C 4-3 C) >, C N 4.3 N 3 cn C) G) N H .-4 4- L 4- O m M •,-1 L C) N C -0 cn C 0 � - r I m 7 •r1 U L T a•) O O LL J O r f P � 4--) 6 J-) C) • 4 Q) m m L C N m U 0 N H C 4-3 N O) T a) U 4J -0 N cn j m 1 4- N w m 7 am cn •r1 0) as m C N CO m CO m -O L DL CD •' C 3 �_ Q O U O O L O U) 4-- E N -4 O k> L O N N,0� 4) > CD>+ > U lJl e co 7 m (n r 1 .9) O- C •r1 +) 0 r 4 r1 Fa H C H fa m •r1 C +� F- 4- O O Q W Q U)'D N 1� > N f+ m +) CO U O N 4) 4- N N (0 a.) O N O T N C $4 • 1 C Z O • 4 -4 U • -• C C c0 r4 C) > in7 ri O.0 1- -Cm 0.0 T U U F+ m _0 O C) E 7 '0 O H OOD ,��. T 0NL1- O)7 N10 CL CL Cam+) 4J U N C ^U -rl •r1 P O O >, H j D • .,In 14 ri C C 'a C L ri m C 0 3 0 N m 0 >, -a > 4 QI U U m O V- O N I Ln -H d •rl 'O U cn -0 O) r-1 H> O +) •rl H C +) N O •14 W 4) a _0 Z q� mT 'o > F- 4) > 10 4- C •11 m N •r1 N O .I C) a-3 m C O C 1) F+ U 1].0) O) -0 C7 N 0) 'a0 U C Q) U 0) CT m 4- m'D •r1 L U) J m •,1 4—'o N cn L m 0) •r1 m 4 '0 4-3 U >, U 7 •r1 cn 0 4- r•( a C 7 C O - 1 z 1_ i 4) L m U m m g ^ Q O •) •O N U N H O 4) N Y Y 4) I 7 Q) CO > 0h LL 7 •-1 C N U (n> 4.) N O> m m (n -4 C N U m N 13 N L NN O-C m m a) 1-0 C N '0 Pa 4 04) > TN 1 O 1n O CD N 4-3 L In LL CL) 4 a fa m m Q) N T3 14 m C m fa m N $4 C N L 4-- LL .0O H G• -C7 H 1-40 54 Mc U) O• N O 3 C) O) -C )U m .•-I O L L C >. 4) O O O C O r1 H 4-3 O 4-30 1 m C •r1 3 U) pa L -o cn N >,A-)L) E U Z 4J X m •r1 r Cl.- J -C U C f..) N > H'0 O U m ma) 4-3 4) L� C a) m E C •.� (n 1 H d O •• Z m C O)-4 C L U 3 3 F4 -t3 L As C cn -4 P= U 4_ L4-) 7 N U C 1-4 C cn 4J N f4 - L�.I 4 m C +) 4 4-) 4 00 W 4 O-0 N O Liz rl O a) O C C N U C m O) O 7 N\0 E • 1 rl m H -1TJQZ H _0 O C 4-= H •O U LU lil 7 N Z O L O Z O) C C t0 Li 4- L O U 0-'0-0C 4u C U 0L +) 4 _H 4-3 L O •rl O m ^' C 1v 0- H 4) r1 m C O m L U a O m r4 Q) •O 7 $4 7 r-1 Cl U +) O w w 1 W •11 > •r1 r4 Q C 7 • 4> N CO N a C •,1 0- CA- N >. N q,) Lc m on C C N •rl U r I L U 4J Q y 1 H C) O 7 L C m 7 4- Y [] N L (U 4) C 4- a 3 m 4- O i rl Y L m U +) L Lit r I U C c0 7 (� Z m r(> u) C) (!) L'0 4-) C O 4- N O •.-1 N m C _G ++ L C N -4 U C i) N = C O - _ Q ,--1 -C-0m m •rl O F� Ln U -4 O F+ � D a N O En Z N� y Q) 4- O L 4 A-) m m (n 4 O 4- O x 1!) m •r1 a) N N 4__ C_I- 7 N (n H fa O IL .Y to 7 O fc 4) a CO 4-3 4.) d CO JP 30 4- U m m 4.) •-4 L > L O +) O m C) M 'A m C • 4 U C a) N O L m O • 1 C U) .04) • 1 4 C T U +) O d W L� L N C'0 3 a) m N L CD -Mcn U W f3) T U C) N 7 O) O� C O V- m m O O U4-+)r1 > O a)>> Ey 7 T AC•r(O N Cam► E W aO Tri O_H O (UU C z O O I C Q •rl V) 4J •ri j-) d C +) 4j v e-i 4 N L •r1 +� O L m N Ti Q O> O NOUN'a FaO) mU CCLin0r4Y=.oLn HNN m w -V m4J W F- > > ' - Z N (n •r1 •ri O_- 4 C )U m C >+ O• •r1 7 B n 7 CO 4 h m N L m 3 m U N Z Q H C T 4) 4-3 > O r-1 N M O- •-I L E ;4 0 O CL 7 O U W N CL m +) 0) ri F m N H T _ M O N C cf1 _H O •rl F+ 4_ L O 6) > O4-3 U U G) +) f•c d La N d) N> k Q n M CO CC •r1 +) M '0 O_ C C) O. '0 F4'0 U N 4- Z 6] A.) O • •O m +) m U L 10 C) O •--I 4) C 0K O +) C al-- C) O Fa O CD C) -H CD O ).) L'0 m 4_ O n) m Hrl 4-3H N Fa C) E r I 0. 4- C) Cl U O. V4 N N fa in M C ca L) (U 0) Z N H L •O +) N cn m C O Z N M r-4 Z O> O I O• L L E O L .-I m •r1 +) += >+ O la L m 4-3 N O m C O •.1 O L E CC0_ Q U> Q 1- 4-) C O H N 7 C7 C.) 3C 7+ G m T d C] C) N F- N C 3 O F+ C .y O U) G) •`-1 U N C) Cr0 fa W L M> C -CU C (r) 7 U +) C H H f .. M L C L N rl U' 4 4) (0 E 4J C •rl 4-) C O N C C) O) +) N O U m O •rl (D a) T N • 4) CO m m N w a•) O m m • •rl > 7 7 C C U 1v •r1 w W 4 $4 N •r1 .0 4) L M 4 fa 3 N fa 0) 0U C �1 C) C) •rl H a) .0m N L • 4 m y U 'D C -0 r_4 C 7 w m G) N C H ••-1 m ••-1 N 14 ••••) ••-I y _ i-) N 7 y 7 ••-1 41 a.) -0 U m Iw 4.. (n 4U r4 -4 m -0 cu a.) 7 .. . a C7 O N +) O O 4- +) () m C a)a) 0) 4- m c0 O fi m N L N 4- 7 L N m O - Q m av N C U O 7LZ m m O C O L E 3 0 >L� L O N4j a O '.:} •-+ N eft WN Np n CD eft w W% %O n CD 0% O .-• N 'n rrC4 fA . rj [�T '� .•d •"') •~ '•" "~ '•'• ""� ~ -4 N N N CV N N CC4 N N N etl eft )f') ee1 _ " "�� _fin...••,,,.,, .. _ .. .. .._ .. ti. _ - - . .. .. ... ... ... .. i . _ _ .... � A. C Y, vim.. •` � .. _ • . .. .. .. .. - � _ . -= 84052qcu a N CC Z:0. 1-4 [L N b M.0 Fa L m C b l�S O ri C p L r IIf _ C N V7 O "'I C m U •• G] k p1 y u1 q a..+ •r! U GS O r - o w 0 L 4� +3 4- -4 > C CA ❑ ... ,y 41 0 F+ +-I -4 m Fa J \ Ol �+ .0 4-3 4•. C V! - 3 U] H C m C r C 4) m r-I 03 ❑I4- J \ N ❑ s•+ La G to ❑ "a +a O r N G] Z C w U U p.{ C m 4 Y W _1 (D 4- m o. > •r1 O C -C as r •rI W r•,I 4-) D V1 C 4-3 $ r 1 r1 C GH] H�II W ri ❑rTf \ p i w�N 3 ¢ T r ❑ y tr► t d \0 CL -4 r-1 �It a-> # W = D d) T-WG 4.) D7 M❑ b @ -I �70. N 41 o r� 47-M4-3.0 41 i7� { i 1 Z C7 Z] b r C N 0) 7+ H 37 .! I -{ C I 'i L tl) r I a 7 .. tts Ia L 01 U • 4- ❑ N Fa O C41 4 D tCf C U T O H r q} 3 OS W a) b N -I "I a r I N O -W C tR � p y U b CD to JC b Q G3 m s+ •i • •• 4. F D b 0 m V1 C H -4 ctl r-I +� U N IL) M C tU H 3 C r C O {] N m 4- I.1 m N_ U m 4 ri C e-f C �a y 47 C C 3 m❑ D 7 Cep (7 N O +4 p m eel N O m C Q m lxl [� (CC C .-I m C ❑ k .7 N C 7 •.a 4- 4-3 r-1 m O 7 m C N +i IY 7❑ D H N �b .t M Um • b ^1 C C U •rt . N U >, Q ••'i �"1 O O m +� •. •rt y tf] Il'1 C U V•1 W -4 th 4-3 -.t w C W •.-! .4s ..-I 03 O •r•1 L .7 3 U M r m sa t7 d) p C� b V) 7 C > •i N [6 M r-1 r-I H L r •r-'1 CA C U L p a..+ ❑ Fa --r •+-I O Q) C) b C y -H M .7 C > L ❑1 tC r-1 .N tT 111 L!7 T ., +s O Q •r-I W C ❑ F "0 H 4.) � C •i X m ., CL � U F+ b -rt L !a3 sa ul C +� - Rf - M ....,O.F N U 3 N N 14 C V) ri )•e -.-I O m (C a 0. - a-• C C M D � CA 7 43 U) %0 ,C C) Fa U U L f• 10 m 4-J ❑ ❑ m O (I) +..,' 4.3 V) r-I 1.+ N -.•I -1 41 a) .-I N ? t to im Aj 0. Q - p Tr t 3 Z Fe J m +' O 4- Z b -H � m ' -' Y U� ❑ C m (D N >, O "I w O ODD �D++U N+L+ 4_ E m m m" M F� 4- 3 Z H r [U C)rI ❑ a cr A❑ t-+r J m G7 W p J N 3: M N C t� ra Ln r .� .-i [r! N = m Of ❑ Z C. i O 7. a L .sa • i �7 b +) LL- \6 N U a1 m a 4.+ D- E y n 01 7 N L ❑ w m 7 LL tU • 1 :t 1 y a "• t Ol m O r CL C a m r! ❑ C]1 N> .H P 0! N C .- 3 � H " Feb •rf 17 93 Q C1 ❑ >, . -fj " G) M 1J is 1.1 C O •.4 L U 1i) 0. M Cz H ❑ 3 f •re LL r I p D a-) N m N m N Q) U❑ 0] R! L N N D 1 I f T m �- U L1 N ri ❑ Z > F t o 4-3 m ' O f 1 N r y m • I L O [I) SC w p C ao Fr Fa 61 as] ❑ N = N O ri ra O tl) [S to Q) V) r Cr ❑ C m +� D O) to .3 (l7 C 13 > N C tS ❑u N C W N mra_,p G7Mw O V! R6 U Q Oxr-I O C Ri +.� Z O W > O E •.-I O C .,i ►.. C❑ N N m w 1.1 m � tR 0 m 4-3 > •-4 ❑ r-I w C s) to 3 C CC ❑ (D L C W> ct: D 0. E .7 3N .1 Y 1\ O C m0) 341 1� iH H CD ❑ n Ll) r-F .. UI11 W Or Hr-1 L It O U 7 C' �o ❑ ❑ r1i+ Osgp O m N N> N UW4-L H I - (A ❑❑ b U 4} m tU N DI �7 m Ja N� C O O C 4- �� ❑ y m a" 1 U •"I U 4- • 1 I- N I- � �+ m +f Z . � D1 N H �s W r� Z C t d) M C> 0. ., I ., 1 p M E (I1 a c0 ; p 4. L m r as CT Sf1 014- ri 3 It1 0 C w C M D to .-I Z J-) N O r U N r 0 U N ❑ C Q] C M •r1 C m TH w 7+ C© O � p y 0 C1 U fa In tl1 ►p •ri CL ;+ >rlL-D b p,-IM a) 3��L� C.4-4CC r-4 O N b , .1 N m m � d +T Nri+! C m a p q.- 4- Rf r-4 E 41 C G)%0 Do N m N Nr-I. q) � N C 13 .rl D C] N r 1 3 r 01 Cc 3 m 4- -••I [If r-i O as 3.7 •N 7 •cl' ❑ C 3 4- 'G m � L J.7 ;..f W N q) D fl L M C s0 m w t0 4, n N -.-I ❑ r D � r rn 1Q Li +3 C to ' 0 .. fa O C .0 O G O .rl N U O tq O M z .. D O O tl) [0 ❑ .-t N f-+ C71 m r-1 •.-I V? m C 0. U 0 C La 4-, -44- '� C} p, Til .-�l ❑ r 4 O O 01 M •r❑i p" C LI1 +a - m M J-Z E 3 r-I m O O 41 M "M C �D m Fa ❑ [+1 U T N m C C] E -•-I H -4 -P O N F• O H N H 0. 1' a..) U U C: N D 0. b C] •o �+ a) >, cn C -f M 41 0 .0 •-I fA a..i CO IC Fi m EL N +� .. 11) v p b N �, U O•- 413c >.UZ Fe \ •-i 11.O(V m OL 7 C n O LA ❑ tCS N ❑ H m O Q) CA❑ Ttl7 1� C > y C N •r•1 m � L.� m D In U � mL N F+ N C C3 W C .0 -r1 C U) Q 7MU 31+01+ C3 D f6 L r� C +� m ' N O CC [l'I 0. �p m C -,..I U? C U F' C fd s0 C +i 0? E •.-1 -rl T C 33 41 1� L -O b W r-I C] m C ❑ ]t p -) a..) Fa m C a) s] N (N ca to m o m •,O•I � � C3 C',11 O � � � '� W 4-1 b [tf � ft f] G] 0. C C •.-1 U N W r C I ri C U ❑ �1 L N U e1 _•a: .. ]+ r G] �+ r-1 1- r R r C ul +3 N D! r C „❑.� ,� a s> U b D •.o st m 1J m .0 O m O 4 m Gf N .I D❑ m •.-i 41 CT 01 C r I N •-t L m ++ .+ Fa 7 v C] a) m H x+ � -1 -4 M r 1 O� C O 0) C C7 0 (L) f~ +) m 1� 0 in m " V! N N m d N s7 r-t O] }] .,..I Df O r +3 ' FH O --I \ �O O. 3 ❑ 7• r-1 C ..i ❑ 4.. J-f Q7 C77.� Q I+ •C iii tU N .G ❑ 7 C Fe rY •.y D O.. Y M 4-) r m H C to mom+ N Z D7 v) a. N co m r •-1 r w m p TJ C •�I N D W C: Q] p)3s1 7 U U •r•L ; v: • s] C C W +� +) a..3 l► C 1J 4-3 •14 Fe Ln 1.1 C U .0 1_ - Fe r D •.t m W >+ lr3 N r-1 1 C N w r-1 e-i O Q) D 3 U C C •--I [i! F•1 F+ O N E C �-) Z ❑ Se U ri m 111 U N - 4 C ,u .,,( r-I 7 .v D +� E tm n ,W " G] CA+--1 1> > 07 L C U r N L �S O > Q N fle }- X N LL W UQ D U I r D❑ O m >HZ D_U O I L (6 r-f N 0. 0) 0 D> ul U Fa F W W p) L❑ 10 ❑ D r C r-I m m� m N H •C D f~ •"1 C 1> > �a C) N D p F4 : W 3 U >F-W N Le O'D m+. torN mZ 4110,_� U 0) >Hto'�CL.3•U1 >, =)Z CO11N :.1 i ••, .•e N ery P tD tN O'C .r '� N ...e "'� ". m Q, O .r N eel `Q fe'•� - .. i } •"• ^. '••� .r .r N N N N N N N N N N ee1 N eel ee► R1 1e% r d.. - 840529 C Tn 01 0 CD fn \ C Q? • •ri +� C) C to _ Y 4- 0 E Z M rC 4•1 [6 N .7 N r•1 M O rvx. co a)C C) Z +1 W to U A Q) J '^ 3 0 0 0 .. U q) q- > .•. fu + y O C7 -.i 4J Q.1 N Q) C] > F o -4 O C rtl g {'• 0 q F•H C) -4F• U U CZ N C O N a? G ., � � U ❑0.-4 � q � O CCU y 4; � V O ?: . C >~ a t, to r LL! •q ti ..-r � U) a) tL -o ° TT N Q) 1 1u C as a) ' I. I C71 Q H W J 'o O O� C~'� C� 4J C7 4J -7 +•L >, N rC FN Z7 H rl J Z > • - - • - - N M rIf C .fa O f.L rd N •.-[ C) q L.L l.L Cr . 1L i H H * 1 O1 W C Q O Y O Lr) CT U7 0 + t C U i7 0 -� 0) 0. C N O .-•I C: C >, O Q) 6� � m CTr-1 N Q N C J t q U ,-I .0 0 H rCf C rlf ,C � U 4J p N 0+ -o z •ri O O C ;.a CR U] 10 to Cl r6 \ 4.3 O X - W 4J H - ate) - n, o ayi L[1 H rn C5 t� p �' o_ � ., -i¢C] OC)tnrn� ¢ p m ram 0U'a=4 vmN o �F- CV co U-1 No to lt] -o O a) LL_ i 1 H +� OI CA'r- W •� •• •• � C) is . - - tV�• I O 3 .-. N .. [O +C•1 •.CI •�„t �7 W +1 Ch N rL1 C) U t7 Q 7 6 Qt Z rn N Q •--1 n N q N . .. M Fa cZ .ys CI LC .0 N !L! Y T 3 7) C Lt_ Ori o lCE W Cn 4.) 1 D C iC) W � -- co MCD C 4) r~ O ET[O QN _0 H0 +r1rO-H 0\ )C) N L cII�M' . - Q) Q) .--I co � rw \O 4J C W AJ 01 F•1 43 CN m � a) 4.3 y � fC C) +N-I � �' � �-Q- • 7 a] C C m\jo m -44J N •0 CI N [Ii fl � Fa O = C U 3 F s � 7i 01N .-I C —4 r Lr% 0 E 3l O U 0% cL to m _0 � � •: cn C 0 a.., Lo .-1 n ,..i n 0 o o No m L o q. c Q) C ro Ft �a H I-- Ol > .4,1 �7 G7 t17 t!] r!) •b > L j 4- 0O3: J [--1 %0 rF-• C) C .. C 1d �0 M _ . M O O> _.'.T .L1 co ra M N Q] a) M a) O 0 E O M 4 r-r Q) N M lx. O 7 s� O C N q rot o o co G is N CZC 7 C C N W - H+x U t a) ❑ [O H [-•i O c Q) 7 Rl Q) a.] O O C) Qr r -. . d-1 N a C) 4-)F-t ri 0 C � +-J y H > T1l > > O +x ro > -� y C 0 7 -4 H 7 ro Aj .Lj o t!) c•. T � 4) ro Q q 4 a C) •-I C)Q� •rt •'-I .. (ia-1 C H 7 O P -4 d �-'1 O .0 � in tII H H Z U L . U -1 4-3 rn v) C ID C 4-1 H 1n C 4J .0 N U U q 0� C 4-3O D U 4-)� C C 0 C3 C) - 4 H ro M C) H N Q)'0 O E 0C NO C aO C Ut O ar O N❑ m 0 O r-► ❑ •jR N N C"E C) I N L•1 E 0 M O rA r LLB ) (n M M O -1 � .O4-3 4-3 a N 01 Co V-- m N U 4-3 . 7t[� rC ••-I (n U r--I (o r- t .y U F 1 fo q '0 \0 M r, u1 O 0 0 � LLI y� 00 L C) O N C .•-! r-i C7 Ol 4J M • .) O 0 4a 1n Z .7 r--ro n C O L!J �..+ CD H•t3 U ri 1 C -" C= -4 4) O N O U) CJY U L - 1 .--I -4 ❑ „i ❑ 1 m m 0 ❑ � •-+ ^► r t . I .� � Enw it �• +gym M 3 to H -4 C.)> q . ! J'C S/3 � a- !4 Fa U = I r r I 1 q F-- � ' C) 7 q CZ F- U _ .•r .•r ~ N N N N N .•r , . •Mr �-[ •�i �•• `N"'• •A'• N N N N N �D n LA O. r'r1 M SIVOIRUDDS tRMQ-5 - a:x' ` - y .w r is � t�• _ �•.~ f . �7 s• �i y:G S rr �Y ''��.,'?''.'s�.'.•.�' - .. r �`i+�.a^ .:.e•.. �`�::.�. - is-. 20030513002214.001 When Recorded, Return to WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY 2CI0391513002214 LAND TITLE CH 1 F 23 Pacs 001 OF 807A?4Ho 26 e0 I3OT,`azPO BOX 9777 KNGCUNYW FEDERAL WAY WA 98063-9777 RESUBMITTED FIRST AMENDMENT TO CfrY OF FEDERAL. WAY COMMUNrrY DEVELOPMENT WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY CONCOMITANT PRE -ANNEXATION ZONING AGREEMENT Grantor Grantee Legal Description (abbreviated) - Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 1) Weyerhaeuser Company, 2) The Quadrant Corporation The Public Portions of Sections 15, 16, 21 and 22, Township 21N, Range 4 East, W M., King County, Washington 152104 9178 01, 215465 0030 06, 215465 0070 07, 215465 0100 01, 215465 0130 05, 212104 901401, THIS AMENDMENT, made and entered into this r 0 , day of 2003, by and between WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, a Washington corporation ("Weyerhaeuser"), THE QUADRANT CORPORATION ("Quadrant"), and the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the Optional Municipal Code and other laws of the State of Washington ("the City"), collectively "the Parties." RECITALS A On August 23, 1994, Weyerhaeuser and the City entered into an agreement known as the Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre- Annexation Zoning Agreement ("Weyerhaeuser CZA") establishing zoning, development standards and procedures which would apply to the development of certain property owned by Weyerhaeuser ("Weyerhaeuser Property") upon annexation of the property into the City The Weyerhaeuser CZA is recorded in the real property records of King County under Recording No 9410260933 B By Ordinance No. 94-220, adopted on September 21,1994, and effective October 2,1994, the City annexed the Weyerhaeuser Property, with zoning designations including Office Park-1 ("OP-1") and Corporate Park-1 ("CP-1"), along with associated zoning boundaries, development standards and procedures, as contained in the Weyerhaeuser CZA C Since the annexation of the Weyerhaeuser Property to the City, the City by Ordinance No. 98- 330 rezoned certain real property zoned OP-1 by the Weyerhaeuser CZA, therefore, the Parties now desire to amend the Weyerhaeuser CZA in order to delete this certain property from the OP-1 zoning district and the overall Weyerhaeuser CZA 20030613002214.002 D Since the Weyerhaeuser Property was annexed, the City has modified and streamlined its permitting procedures relative to processing binding site plans The Parties now also desire to amend and incorporate these revised procedures into the Weyerhaeuser CZA E The Weyerhaeuser CZA authorizes the City Manager, on behalf of the City, to approve minor amendments to the CZA This Amendment shall be processed as a minor amendment pursuant to Section 22 of the Weyerhaeuser CZA NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements contained herein, as well as other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree to amend the Weyerhaeuser CZA as follows 1 _Amendment to Weyerhaeuser Property legal description, property boundaries, and zoning boundaries. Exhibits A-1, A-2, B, CK and D to the Weyerhaeuser CZA set forth the legal descriptions, property and zoning boundaries for Weyerhaeuser Property subject to the Weyerhaeuser CZA. The Weyerhaeuser CZA and exhibits are hereby amended to delete certain property as described and depicted in Exhibit A-3 attached hereto and incorporated herein The new boundaries of the OP-1 zone are as depicted on Exhibit CK attached hereto and incorporated herein 2 Amendment to Weyerhaeuser CZA procedures. The process for reviewing binding site plan applications established in Exhibit D (0-1), Section Vl� Subdivisions within the OP-1 Zone, is hereby amended to provide that "Any binding site plan application pursuant to Sections 20-61 through 20-68 of the FWC shall be subject to the application and review process applicable to short subdivisions as set forth in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Division 4, Binding Site Plans, Supplement No. 18, or as thereafter amended." 3 The changes provided for herein only apply to those 6 parcels identified by Assessor's Tax Parcel ID # shown on page 1, above The attached Exhibits A-3 and CK are for general reference and include real property owned by others than Weyerhaeuser and Quadrant This First Amendment in no way encumbers, restricts, modifies or benefits any real property not included in the 6 specifically referenced parcels as the same exist on the date shown on the Weyerhaeuser acknowledgement 4 Effective Date. This Amendment shall become effective upon the date of execution of this Amendment by Weyerhaeuser, Quadrant, and the Federal Way City Manager S Term of Amendment. This Amendment shall remain in full force and effect until terminated by mutual agreement of the Parties. 6 Enforcement. Venue and jurisdiction to enforce this Amendment shall lie in King Fast Arnendment Weyerhaeuser Zoning AgreementPage 2 20030513002214.003 County Superior Court, unless the parties agree to mediation or binding arbitration. The obligations of the parties hereunder do not have an adequate remedy by way of an action for damages and may be enforced by an action for specific performance 7 Attorneys' Fees and Costs. In the event either party commences proceedings in King County Supenor Court to enforce this Amendment, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and actual costs 8. Governine Law. Tins Amendment is entered into under the laws of the State of Washington, and the Parties intend that Washington law shall apply to the interpretation hereof. 9 Binding Effect. This Amendment shall run with the land, shall touch and concern the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the current owners, their respective heirs and their successors and assigns 10 Severability. Nothing contained in this Amendment shall be construed so as to require commission of any act contrary to law, and whenever there is any conflict between any provision contained in this Amendment and any present or future statute or law, ordinance or regulation or judicial ruling or governmental decision, the latter shall prevail, but the provision of this Amendment which is affected shall be limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of such law, ruling or decision without invalidating or affecting the remaining provisions of this Amendment 11 Effect of Amendment. Except as amended herein, the Weyerhaeuser CZA shall remain in full force and effect 12 Incorporation -of Exhibits and Recitals. The Exhibits attached hereto and the Recitals stated above are incorporated into this Amendment. IN WrrtvESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have entered into this Amendment executed as of the day and date fast written above WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY a WashingtoEg tion By 2 Name D t Title VP $uStiru s,� S�yttta Fust Amendment Weyerhaeuser Zomng AgreementPage 3 20030513002214.004 THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, a Washington municipal corporation By. acne Da i Moseley Title. City Manager EST: � r City Clerk, N Chri-sti;e—lffreL, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM &ir— �ky Attorney> rieia A. Richardson STATE OF WASHINGTON ) THE QUADRANT CORPORATION I �� - By. — , cl"— Name QL A -CC L Title- ss COUNTY OF KING ) On thus day personally before me QA. t e to me known to be the Y�ir��i �e S . WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, the Washington corporation that executed the foregoing ustrument, and acknowledged such instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that [he/she] was duly authorized to execute such instrument. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 8'L day of CtrAAL, Pn Nixie OD NO AR UBLIC inan for the State of Washington, residing at My 94prntssion Expires ulanUAW 10 , ZOO& First Amendment Weyerhaeuser Zoning AgreementPage 4 20030513002214.005 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally before me David H. Moseley to me known to be the City Manager of the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, the Washington municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged such instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that [he/she] was duly authorized to execute such instrument 4r GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this '�dty of 2003 NOTARY PUBLIC in and fib Ae State of Washington, residing at My Commission Expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) On this dray perso ally b fore me t �, • , to me known to be the S2 l�.LPL� P' of the THE QUADRANT CORPORATION the Washington corporation that executed the fore -ping instrument, and acknowledged such instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of such corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that [he/she] was duly authorized to execute such instrument GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day ofy 2002 ' FOTARY KILLMER Prin Name PUBLIC NEWASHIPIRE NOTARY PUBLIC in d for the State of N EXPfRirS 2 003 Washington, residing at My Commission Expires 7 First Amendment Weyerhaeuser Zoning AgreementPage 5 20030513002214.006 EXHIBIT "OK" TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY "OP-1" ZONING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 15. 16, 21 AND 22. TWP 21 N . RGE 4 E , W M 9 Ia------- _ 10 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON NOTES SECTION LINES AND CORNERS ARE SHOWN HEREON APPROXIMATELY AS AN AID IN LOCATING THE PROPERTY AND ARE NOT BASED UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY ZONING DESIGNATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY HILLIS CLARK MARTIN do PETERSON IN APRIL, 1994 16 1s 1 rrfr �0{� e i ap F /+ FF s 1;4th sr I I, EXCEPTIONS f 0 5��r f)sr. s44M St f Vi 3 l ✓� N CONBN.lTIN4 INOINIF IN F.F.o ® aw roes no xnm a.e., e..., wee wm.v ■wr., wer W.r.ntm 00000 berm +w.rmw Fatal eat am rr Jae n 1 1 SCALE r - loca JOB NO 191-41-93D-DO2 DRAWING NAME EXH-CK DATE 04-20-99 DRAWN C A F SHEET I OF 1 20030513002214.007 EXHIBIT "A- 3" TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPIOSE0-THE FIRST AMENOMA W To " THE WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY "OP-1 ZONING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 15, 16, 21 AND 22, TWP 21 N, RGE 4 E, W M KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON NOTES SECTION LINES AND CORNERS ARE SHOWN HEREON APPROXIMATELY AS AN AID IN LOCATING THE PROPERTY AND ARE NOT BASED N UPON AN ACTUAL SURVEY ZONING DESIGNATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY HILLIS. CLARK, MARTIN & PETERSON IN APRIL, 1994 z rr fl � �7 rr rr .E j I 51 �/ I1 16 I1 South SJ6fh Shwf ;- F4 EXCEPTIONS t 21 — — J I NEW NEW COMPANY LOGO 58MCNA +ter WAINOA x 10 EI f it Efa E ?i 1 r 0 r Vr+ V� 1 t 1 I1 I '� LoKg I �IE 1E 1 � a j S .S3Ith SL rr�! ■ 1 b!i r�e n EOALE T - 10W JOB NO 191-41-930-002 DRAWING NAME EXH-CK DATE DRAWN 0*0 C SHEET 1 OF f