Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
17-100455
CITY OF CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way Federal Way, WA 3) 835-6325 7000 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Mr. Eric LaBrie FILE October 27, 2017 ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 eric.labrie[[V=rn—gyfl. ;= Re: File #17-100455-SU; BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPROVAL Greenline Technology Center BLA, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: The City of Federal Way has completed an administrative -review of the above -referenced Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application. The Department of Community Development hereby approves the BLA with conditions based on the survey drawing prepared by ESM, resubmitted on October 24, 2017. BACKGROUND The applicant proposes to alter the interior lot lines between three lots in the Corporate Park-1 (CP-1) zone. Existing Lot G is 48.01 acres in size, Lot H is approximately 55 acres, and Lot I is 2.41 acres. Proposed Lot 1 will be 48.12 acres, Lot 2 will be 30.21 acres, and Lot 3 will be approximately 26.2 acres. The existing Greenline Technology Center and its associated parking lots will be located on proposed Lot 1. DECISIONAL CRITERIA City staff has determined the BLA meets decisional criteria set forth in Federal Way Revised Cade (FWRC) Chapter 18.10: The BLA is a minor alteration in the location of lot boundaries on existing lots. The BLA will not increase the number of lots, nor diminish the size of open space or other protected environments. A critical areas report and subsequent resubmittals were provided by the applicant, "Existing Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels G, H, & 1)," by Talasaea (March 29, 2017, revised September 1, 2017 with October 23, 2017, addendum). The materials were peer reviewed by the city's consultant, ESA. The wetland delineations, ratings, and buffers have been reviewed and are shown on the BLA drawing. 2. The BLA will not diminish the size of any lot so as to result in a lot of less square footage than prescribed in the CP-1 zoning district. The 1994 Concomitant Zoning Agreement (CZA) for the subject property does not contain a prescriptive minimum lot size for the CP-1 zone. 3. The BLA will not result in the reduction of setbacks or lot coverage to less than prescribed by the CP-1 zoning district. In the CZA no setbacks are specified for the CP-1 zone, except for the continuous Managed Forest Buffer to be provided around the entire perimeter of the CP-1 property, which is unaffected by the BLA. The CZA contains a lot coverage standard of 70 percent of the total CP-1 zoned property, which is unaffected by the BLA as all the three parcels are all zoned CP-1. 4. All lots resulting from the BLA will be in conformance with the design standards of the city's subdivision title. Lot 3 will remain bisected by Weyerhaeuser Way South; unchanged as a result of the BLA. Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 2of2 October 27, 2017 5. The southern portion of Lot 3 cannot access Weyerhaeuser Way and meet the 150-foot driveway spacing standard. To avoid a nonconforming driveway separation, an access and utility easement will be recorded across proposed Lot 1 in favor of proposed Lot 3 to allow use of the existing private loop road. CONDITION OF APPROVAL 1. Make the following corrections to the drawing: a. On Sheet 3, amend Note #3 to include the report addendum dated October 23, 2017. b. On Sheet 7, correct the labels for Wetland DK, which should be DJ, and Wetland AX, which should be AV. c. On Sheet 10, correct the label for Wetland PQ, which should be PG(BJ). RECORDING Pursuant to FWRC 18.10.060, all boundary line adjustments shall be recorded with the King County Division of Elections and Records. To finalize the BLA process, please use the enclosed Resubmittal Information form and submit to the Permit Center one signed and notarized drawing (mylar or paper) and one paper copy of the signed/notarized drawing for city signatures. Please note: Per state law, on the drawing all signatures and writing shall be made with permanent black ink, including notary stamps. The applicant will record the BLA. Please return one conformed copy to the city immediately after recording. No changes to the BLA document are allowed following city signature (with the exception of writing in the easement recording number in the placeholders on Sheets 9 and 10). If the county recording process necessitates revisions to the BLA map, you must request and receive approval of any change from city staff prior to recording. The applicant must also record the access easement prior to or at the same time of recording the BEA and return a recorded copy to the city. CLOSING The BLA is hereby approved with the condition as detailed above. This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Brian Davis Community Development Director enc: Approved BLA Drawing (resubmitted 10-24-17) Resubmittal Form Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Tom Messmer, tm ssm • inrlustrialrenit� o r m File #17-100455-00-SU Doc. LD. 75807 CITY OF All ,§,& Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 83577000 wwwcityoffederalway. cam Jim Ferrell, Mayor October 17, 2017 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: File #17-100455-SU; 2— ROUND TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Greenline Technology Center BLA, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: The City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development is in receipt of the resubmittal of the above -referenced Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application. Staff has completed technical review of the resubmittal and the following items must be addressed prior to the city approving the BLA application. Stacey Welsh, Planning Division, 253-835-2634, stacey.weish@citvoffederalway.com 1. Review and address the item in the enclosed October 16, 2017, response memo from ESA. On BLA Sheet 9 and in the wetland report, wetlands K14, KI, KJ, K <, KI.., and KM were removed. This does not match the comment response letter from Talasaea that says no changes were made in that area. The wetland report, maps, and BLA drawings must be updated to show those six wetlands again. 2. On BLA Sheet 3, update Note 3 regarding Talasaea field work conducted in August 2017 and include the full title of the Talasaea report. 3. On BLA Sheet 9, an inadequate buffer for Wetland BR is shown; it must be 105 feet per Appendix B in the wetland report. 4. On BLA Sheet 10, the new note referencing a 200 foot lake buffer needs to be removed as no such requirement exists. Also review and correct the 101 foot buffer label. 5. On BLA Sheet 10, new information related to the shoreline of North Lake was added. This information was not requested and the drawing previously stated "approximate edge of North Lake." Was this information added to the drawing to better denote the location of the property line? The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) is not shown and has not been verified. Add a note that states the location of the shoreline of North Lake is shown for property boundary location purposes, not for critical areas/shoreline code regulatory purposes, and has not been verified by the City of Federal Way (or similar language). 6. Given the number of wetlands and layout of the mosaics, for clarity label the wetlands with their IDs on the BLA drawing. Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 2 of 2 October 17, 2017 7. Please do not provide signed mylars until requested to do so by the city. CLOSING Once the revisions -listed above are made, provide two paper copies of the BLA document with the enclosed Resubmittal Form, along with a letter explaining how the technical comments have been addressed. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRq 18.05.080, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within. 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. Please contact me at state .welsh ci offederal%vay.com, or 253-835-2634, if you have questions regarding this letter or your application. Sincerely, X�'�- -Itj-&� Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner enc: Letter from ESA, October 16, 2017 Resubmittal Form Brian Davis, Community Development Director Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Tom Messmer, rme�4me n titrialrc alty r u -c Im File 17-100455-00-SU Doc. I.D. 76696 Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: 888.00 Page-1 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA r`- When Recorded Return to: McCullough Hill Leary, P.S. 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6600 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Courtney A. Kaylor r BUSS TAX NOT REQURUD 6ivie0on : JuiJ DECLARAtiON OF ACCESS EASEMENT Grantor: Federal W*arnpus, LLC Grantee: Federal Way Campus, LLC Abbrev. Legal Desc: Portion SE 1/4 Section 16, T 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. Complete legal j, bit A and Exhibit B Assessor's Tax Parcel #s: 1621049013 Reference #: N/A 0- THIS DECLARATION OF ACCESS EASE ("Agreement") is made this �-� day of 2017, by Federal Way C LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Declarant"). Recitals A. Declarant is the owner of the real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Burdened Property"). B. Declarant is the owner of the real property located in Federal Way, Washington legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto ("Benefitted Property"). C. Declarant is adjusting the boundaries of the Burdened and Benefitted Properties by City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-100455-SU currently under review by the City. D. Declarant wishes to establish an easement to allow the users of the Benefitted Property access over and to place utilities under a portion of the Burdened Property, on the terms and conditions set forth herein. -1- Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: S88.00 Page-2 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA Declaration Now therefore, the Declarant subjects the Benefitted Property and the Burdened Property to the following easement, covenants and conditions: 1. Access and Utilities Easement. Declarant hereby declares and subjects the Burdened Property to a perpetual nonexclusive easement (the `Basement"), which is appurtenant to and runs with the Benefitted Property, over, across and under the real property legally described in Exhibit C and depicted in Exhibit D (the "Easement Area") for the purpose of ingress and egress between the Benefitted Property and Weyerhaeuser Way South and for utilities. 2. Maintenance of Easement Axes. Declarant, as owner of the Benefitted Property, may construct a driveway and utilities **thin the Easement Area (collectively, "Improvements"), as approved by the City of Federaf Wgy. Declarant, as owner of the Benefitted Property, shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits and approvals for construction of the Improvements, restoring the Easement A ca to as good or better a condition as existed prior to the construction of the Improvements, and maintaining the Improvements located within the Easement Area in good and safe conditi&�els 3. Indemnification. Declarant, as ownf the Benefitted Property, shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Declarant, as owner of the Burdened Property, from any and all claims, loss, damage, costs (including the cost of litigation) and liability resulting from any actual or alleged injury to person or property whi ch inay arise as the result of the Declarant's use of the Easement Area as owner of the Benefitted Property, 4. No Dedication to the Public. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Area or the improvements thereon to the general public or for any public use. 5. Reservation. Declarant, as owner of the Burdened Property, reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any and all purposes which do not materially interfere with the use and operation of the Easement Area and are not otherwise inconsistent with the rights herein contained. 6. Assignment, Binding Effect. The Easement and rights granted herein and the conditions herein contained shall be a covenant running with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Declarant and its successors and assigns. 7. No Mereer. It is the intention of the Declarant that the Easement and rights granted herein and covenants herein contained shall not extinguish or terminate by operation of the doctrine of merger or otherwise by reason of existing or future common ownership of the Benefitted Property and Burdened Property. 8. Miscellaneous. Time is of the essence hereof. The headings contained herein shall not be used to interpret the provisions hereof. This Easement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State of Washington. Jurisdiction and venue for any action -2- Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: 888.00 Page-3 of 15 Record Date:118/201810:10 AM King County, WA commenced to enforce this Agreement shall be the County of King, State of Washington. This Agreement may not be modified except by a written agreement signed by Declarant as owner of the Benefxtted Party and as owner of the Burdened Party. Declarant's failure to enforce any provision hereof shall not constitute waiver thereof in any future instance. If any provision hereof is held to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue -in full force and effect. DECLARANT: FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, �+r:7P1"1-i gY Print name: T.C. Messmer_ Title: Vice President — 0000* 0- S -3- Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: S88.00 Page-4 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that —r C_ . m e.s5 n1 e. - is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the 1%1 Pie j d of euz, a Delaware limited liability company, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: ..,.• 2017. ►����..■■nyyll� gat A ram, ` ,e Comm( 00 402 SLID +'+r, SHIN��►►►� -4- in and for the State of Washington expires: Ln 1-o [nstrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: S88.00 Page-5 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA r Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No.1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 r.. CONSU NG ENGlN�ERS LLc 6 EXHIBIT A y' GAL DESCRIPTION OF WgRENED PROPERTY That portion of Sections 15 and 16, ip 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southwesterly come he East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan as recorded in Volume 19 ,.Plats, Pages 39 through 45, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 19990916001397, also being a point on the southeasterly margin of Interstate 5; it APk THENCE along said southeasterly margin, S 16°3A4` W, 262.01 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, N 73`20'26" W, 25.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 16"39'34" W, 744.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 530.85 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 11,335.00 feet, through a central angle of 02041'00" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 13*58'34" W, 983.01 feet to the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 16; THENCE along said south line AND the south line of Government Lot 1 of Section 16, S 88*19'11 " 1, 1348AO feet to a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet the radius point of which bears S 56'06'04" E, through a central angle of 03°31'01 "; ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 205 2010 SE Evera t Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying landscape Architecture b3 L�.MFett' WA MU 925.297.9900ta1 3U Laser Scanning GIS 8011345S694 toll free www.esmcivii.com 675297..9901 UX Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: 588.00 Page-6 of 15 Record Date:l/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 2 THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 52°35'03° W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 42.23 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1257.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 52°35'03" E, through a central angle of 01 05630% THENCE continuing along s I rthwesterly margin, N 50°39'33° W 15.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINZ THENCE continuing N 50°39'33pr,° 7.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet; through a central angle of 04°43'38" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 71'45'.10 to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right; having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 63°23'43" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northwesterly 450.72 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 655.00 feet, through a central angle of 39°25'36' to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northerly 267.17 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 490.00 feet, through a central angle of 31 °14'24" to a point of reverse curvature; . THENCE northerly 109.54 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 515.00 feel; through a central angle of 12'1111" to a point of tangency; THENCE N 24*11'27" E, 710.81 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northeasterly 297.69 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1525.00 feet; through a central angle of 11'11'04" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northeasterly 325.03 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 535.00 feet, through a central angle of 34'48'34" to a point of compound curvature; Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: S88.00 Page-7 of 15 Record Date:1/8/201810:10 AM King County, WA r- Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 3 THENCE easterly 595,57 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 340.00 feet, through a central angle of 100*21'48' to a paint of tangency; THENCE S 09"27'07" E. 11.23 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE southeasterly 81.34 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 77040'28" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE easterly 175.07 fee o the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 500.00 feet, through a cen gle of 20°03'42" to a point of tangency; THENCE S 67003'53" E, 40.58 fe point of curvature on said northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South: THENCE along said northwesterly margin,. southwesterly 239.28 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a dl s of 1030.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 67°03'53" E, through a central angle 13°18'38" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly +I r in, S 09°37'29- W, 484.24 feet to a point of curvature; thence continuing along said north�k&`rly margin, southwesterly 770.34 feet along the are of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1170.00 feet, through a central angle of 37°43'27" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, a 47°20'56" W, 141.77 feet; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 42°39'04" W, 7.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, S 47020'56" W,141.29 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 58.71 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1237.00 feet, through a central angle of 02'43'10'; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 45°22'14" W, 7.00 to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 43.31 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1244.00 feet the radius point of which bears S 45`22'14" E, through a central angle of 01 059'41 "; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 47°21'55" W, 28.00 feet to a point of curvature; Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: S88.00 Page-8 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA r_. Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 4 THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 73,13 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1272.00 feet, the radius point of which hears S 47°21'55° E, through a central angle of 03"1 T38' to the TRUE POINT OF BEGNNiNG. Containing 2,096,100 square feet (48.120 acres), more or less. Hesm-lobs1l8861001101 6-�)01 aldc,cumenjtld�002doc Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: $88.00 Page-9 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA CONSUf TING ENGINEERS LLC WOW I Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No.1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 EXHIBIT B i DESCRIPTION TTED PROPERTY That portion of Sections 15 and 16, Tip 21 North, Range 4 East W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being more;particuiarly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southwesterly corneir East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 I? Binding Site Plan as recorded in Volume 191 of Pages 39 through 45, inclusive, under King County Recording No.199909160019 also being a point on the southeasterly margin of Interstate 5; THENCE along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W 262.01 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, N 73020'26" W, 25.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W, 744.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 160.90 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 11,335.00 feet, through a central angle of 00°48'48" to the south line of the northeast quarter of. Section 16 (also known as the southerly line of Lot 7 of City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. BLA 99-002 as recorded under Recording No. 9905129004), being a point on said curve AND the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 369.95 feet along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 11,335.00 feet through a central angle of 01'52'12' to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 13°58'34° W, 983.01 feet to the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 16; ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 Bth Ave S, Ste 205 SOLO SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federdt Way, WA 98003 n3.9na.6I13t 4 Everett, WA 96208 425.29799001el 30 Laser Scanning GIs B00.345.5694 toll free .00.3455694 toll free www.esmcivil.com 253.838.7104 fax 42.5.2973901 fax Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: $88.00 Page-10 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 2 THENCE along said south line AND the south line of Government Lot 1 of Section 16, S 8801911 ° E,1348.40 feet to a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet; the radius point of which bears S 56°06'04" E, through a central angle of 03°31'01 "; THENCE continuing along said northwesterty margin, N 52°35'03" W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature;+ THENCE continuing along said no' teriy margin, northeasterly 42.23 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the rig ing a radius of 1257.00 fee€, the radius point of which bears S 52°35'03" E, through a angle of 01 °55'30"; THENCE continuing along said northwes argin, N 50°39'33` W. 15.00 feet; THENCE continuing N 50`39'33" W, 37.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a.tangent curve to the right; having a radius of 480.00 feet, through a central angle of 04°43'38' to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feel; through a central angle of 71 *45'10 to a point ref reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 83°23'43" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northwesterly 450.72 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 655.00 feet', through a central angle of 39°25'36" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northerly 267.17 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 490.00 feet, through a central angle of 31 °14'24" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE northerly 109.54 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 515.00 feet; through a central angle of 12°11'11 " to a point of tangency; THENCE N 24011'27" E, 301.93 feet to said south line of the northeast quarter of Section 16; THENCE along said south line, N 88°23'02° W, 640.70 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: S88.00 Page-11 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA r_. Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 3 TOGETHER WITH that portion of said Section 16, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the east quarter comer of said Section 16; THENCE along the east line of said section, S 00°54'31 " W, 280.07 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGITING; THENCE continuing � said east line, S 00054'31 " W, 323.27 feet; THENCE N 89°05'29° W. . feet; THENCE S 00054'31" W, 97. THENCE N 89005'29' W, 7&001 . THENCE S 00054'31 " W,140.00 fe�t�� THENCE S 84038'11' E, 84.08 feet to the line of North Lane; THENCE along said shoreline, the following curses: S 10033'33" W, 34.75 feet, S 14°50'51 " W, 31.55 feet; S 23°47'48" W, 68.08 feet: S 26°00'29" W, 88.68 feet; S 28°36'54° W, 68.59 feet; S 22°20140° W, 41.36 feet S 10°06'33" W, 79.32 feet; S 19°56'27" E, 48.12 feet; S 17°22'15" E, 45.88 feet to the northerly line of that State Plat of said Section 16 as recorded in Volume 41 of Plats, Pages 30 through 32, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: S88.00 Page-12 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 4 THENCE along said northerly line, N 88°19'11 " W. 570.29 feet to a point of curvature on the easterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said easterly margin, northeasterly 227.76 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the tight, having a radius of 1166,00 feet, the radius paint of which bears S 53°50'34" E� through a central angle of 11'11'30' to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 47-20'56- E, 141.29 feet THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 42039'04' W, 4,00 feet; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 47e20'56- E, 141.77 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE Continuing along said easterly margin, northeasterly 757.41 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, haviftg a. radius of 1230.00 feet, through a central angle of 35'44'50° to the TRUE PQINT10F BEGINNING. Containing 26.2 acres, more or less, with the partion vvestetty of Weyerhaeuser Way S. being 922,550 s.f. (21.179 acres) more or less and with the portion easterly of Weyerhaeuser Way S. being approximately 5.0 acres hesm-iobs118861001101 6-00101documentlld-003.doc V j?4017 D9- /2 Instrument Number: 2018010800052E Document:EAS Rec: S88.00 Page-13 of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No.1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 CGH U L T I N G ENGINEERS ILC EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA That portion of the southeast quarter of --Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East; W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the easterly. -margin of interstate 5 with the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarte�af.4ald Section 16; THENCE along said south line of the northwest gl,of the southeast quarter and along the south line of Government Lot 1 of said Section - _ S .8801911 " E, 1348.40 feet a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuse.f-Way S.- THENCE along said northwesterly margin, the following courses: northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 56006'04" E, through a central angle of 03°31'01'; N 52°35'03" W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature; northeasterly 4223 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1257.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 52°35'03" E, through a central angle of 01 °55'30"; N 50°39'33- W, 15.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing N 50°39'33" W, 37.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet, through a central angle of 04°43'38' to a point of reverse curvature; ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 Sth Ave S. Ste 205 2010 SE Everatt Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 253.838,6113 tel 425.297.9900te1 30 Laser Scanning GIS 800345.5694 toll free 800.345.SM toll free www.esmcivil.com Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: 588.00 Page -la of 15 Record Date:1/8/2018 10:10 AM King County, WA Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page Two THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet through a central angle of 71'45'10' to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 350.00 feet through a central angle of 83°23'43' THENCE N 55°42'38" E, 60.00 feel to a point of curvature; THENCE easterly 422.10 feet a`6lrg the arc of a non tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 290.00 feet the radius paint of which bears N 55°42'38" E, through a central angle of 83"23'43" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE easterly 15028 feet along the arc. of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 120.00 feet, through a central angle of�Z45'10" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE southeasterly 34.65 feet along t of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 420.00 feet through a central angle W43'38" to a point of tangency; THENCE S 50"39'33" E, 38.67 feet to said north Poy margin of Weyerhaeuser Way S.; c. THENCE along said northwesterly margin, southwes,60.02 feet along the arc of a non tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1272.00 % the radius point of which bears S 47°57'20" E, through a central angle of 02-4213" to tt3eT-RUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 39,200 square feet (0.90 acres), more or less. See attached Exhibit D. Written By: CAF hesm-jobsli ea610011016-0010ldocumentlld-001.doc A2917- at?-19 SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 AND SOUTH LINE OF GOV. LOT 1 OF SECTION 16 5�0�v �F Instrument Number: 20180108000526 Document:EAS Rec: 588.00 Page-15 of 15 Record Date:1/8/201810:10 AM King County, WA EXHIBIT D DEPICTION OF EASEMENT AREA A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON f CITY OF FEDERAL .WAY UNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 17-100455-SU LOT 3 Cl ti } SCALE: 1 "=300' LOT 1 EASEMENT AREA POINT OF COMMENCING 0 A&k£ or%mrrOF p1NING 0 JOB NO. 1886-001-016 DRAWING NAME SR-02 DATE : 2017-09-19 DRAWN C.A.F. SHEET 1 OF 1 iESUBMITTED October 24, 2017 Ms. Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner City of Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 OCT 2 4 2017 OF FEDERAL WAY NiTN DEVELOPMENT Job No. 1886-001-016 RE: File #17-100455-SU; 2ND ROUND TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS Greenline Technology Center BLA, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Welsh: ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC is providing this letter as acknowledgement of the 2"d round of technical comments for the Greenline Technology Center BLA, dated October 17, 2017. Per our typical response letters, ESM has provided responses to city comments in bold. The following comments have been addressed on the enclosed revised BLA maps: 1. Review and address the item in the enclosed October 16, 2017, response memo from ESA. On BLA Sheet 9 and in the wetland report, wetlands KH, KI, KJ, KK, KL, and KM were removed. This does not match the comment response letter from Talasaea that says no changes were made in that area. The wetland report, maps, and BLA drawings must be updated to show those six wetlands again. These comments have been addressed in the attached letter with exhibits from Talasaea dated October 23, 2017. To better serve timing and review workloads, the attached letter serves as an addendum to the Existing Conditions Report The full report will not be updated. 2. On BLA Sheet 3, update Note 3 regarding Talasaea field work conducted in August 2017 and include the full title of the Talasaea report. Note 3 on BLA sheet 3 has been revised to read: EXISTING WETLANDS AND BUFFERS AS DEPICTED HEREIN WERE DELINEATED AND CLASSIFIED BY TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. AS DEFINED IN THAT "EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - TECH CENTER BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT (PARCELS G, H & 1) - FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC - FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON" DATED MARCH 29, 2017 AND REVISED SEPTEMBER 1, 2017. ESM Federal Way 33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 253.838.6113 tel 800.345.5694 toll free 253.838.7104 fax ESM Everett 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Everett, WA 98208 425.297.9900 tel 800.345.5694 toll free a25.297.9901fax Civil Engineering Land Planning Land Surveying Landscape Architecture 30 Laser Scanning GIS www.esmcivii.com Ms. Stacey Welsh, AICP October 24, 2017 Page 2 3. On BLA Sheet 9, an inadequate buffer for Wetland BR is shown; it must be 105 feet per Appendix B in the wetland report. BLA sheet 9 has been revised to show a 105' buffer for wetland BR. 4. On BLA Sheet 10, the new note referencing a 200 foot lake buffer needs to be removed as no such requirement exists. Also review and correct the 101 foot buffer label. BLA sheet 10 has been revised to remove the note referencing a 200 foot lake buffer and the existing buffer label has been corrected. 5. On BLA Sheet 10, new information related to the shoreline of North Lake was added. This information was not requested and the drawing previously stated "approximate edge of North Lake." Was this information added to the drawing to better denote the location of the property line? The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) is not shown and has not been verified. Add a note that states the location of the shoreline of North Lake is shown for property boundary location purposes, not for critical areas/shoreline code regulatory purposes, and has not been verified by the City of Federal Way (or similar language). The Tech Center BLA map that was dated 4/6/17 showed an approximate edge of North Lake that was digitized from aerial imagery. Since then, the edge of North Lake on Parcel H has been field verified by ESM, thus the more precisely depicted boundary. A note has been added which reads: THE LOCATION OF THE SHORELINE OF NORTH LAKE IS SHOWN FOR PROPERTY BOUNDARY PURPOSES AND NOT FOR CRITICAL AREAS/SHORELINE (SMA) REGULATORY PURPOSES, AND HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIEID BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. 6. Given the number of wetlands and layout of the mosaics, for clarity label the wetlands with their IDs on the BLA drawing. The BLA drawing has been revised to show wetlands labeled with their IDs. 7. Please do not provide signed mylars until requested to do so by the city. Mylars have not been provided with this resubmittal. Please note that the previous submittal made on September 19, 2017 included a draft access easement The city has not provided any comment in regards to the draft easement Another copy has been included with this letter. ESM would like to record the easement prior to or concurrently with the Greenline Tech Center BLA Please confirm that the draft access easement is accepted by the City of Federal Way. Stacey Welsh, AICP October 24, 2017 Page 3 If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 253-838-6113. Sincerely, ESM CO ULTI G ENGINEERS, LLC r MATT REIDER Assistant Planner Enc. CC: Tom Messmer Jack McCullough Jennifer Marriott ° TALASALA CONSULTANTS, INC. 23 October 2017 Jim Harris and Stacey Welsh City of Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 89' Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98003 RESUBNc 4 OCT 2 4 20117 CITY OF FED Rk- V4• Y COMMUNITY DEVEL0P ;ENS T TAL-1572C REFERENCE: Existing Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment, Federal Way, Washington SUBJECT: Response to Comments dated 16 October 2017 Dear Jim and Stacey: In response to ESA's comments regarding the Existing Conditions Report — Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment dated 16 October 2017, we are providing the following responses. As is typical with our procedure for response letters, we will be providing your comments verbatim in bold text. Our responses will follow each comment in italic text. Comment: In our August 22, 2017 memorandum, in the second comment and recommendation under Parcel H, we reiterated a discussion during the field meeting that Wetland KH, KM, KL, and KI were five distinct wetlands and not hydrologically connected as we originally suggested. We understood that Talasaea biologists had visited the site during various seasons and a hydrological connection was only present in the wettest conditions. It was concluded during the site visit that based on Talasaea's familiarity with the site, Wetlands KH, KM, KL, and KI were five distinct wetlands as originally mapped and should not be connected. According to Talasaea's August 29, 2017 response memo, our comment and recommendation regarding these wetlands were noted and no changes will be made to these wetlands. However, these wetlands have been removed from the revised submittal documents including the Revised Existing Condition Report and the BLA maps. Recommendation: To rectify the inconsistency between the response letter and the revised submittal documents, Wetlands KH, KM, KL, and KI should be shown on maps in the Revised Existing Conditions Report and the BLA maps. We note that these wetlands are insignificant in size (between 14 and 58 square feet), low functioning (Category IV), and unlike other small wetlands onsite do not appear to Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Beat Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 u Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 Jim Harris and Stacey Welsh 23 October 2017 Page 2of5 be part of a wetland matrix. Based on conversations at the field meeting, it is our understanding that these wetlands were outside the area of potential impact. Outside of the above comment and recommendation, we have concluded that the remainder of our comments and recommendations presented in out August 22, 2017 memo have been accurately and sufficiently addressed in both the Greenline Headquarters Boundary Line Adjustments — Existing Conditions Report or BLA maps. Comments noted. There was a discrepancy between the four wetlands specifically listed in the ESA comments, the five wetlands generally referenced by ESA, and the six wetlands specifically identified within the City comment letter. We defaulted to the largest set of wetlands referenced and included six wetlands back onto the maps, in order to expedite this approval. We have included Wetlands KH, KI, KJ, KK, KL, and KM in our revision to the report and BLA figures, as requested in the comment letter from the City of Federal Way to Eric LaBrie of ESM dated 17 October 2017. Due to the very minor changes resulting from the addition of these tiny wetlands, this comment letter will also serve as an addendum to the Existing Conditions Report dated 1 September 2017. Rating sheets, an updated feature summary table, and revised existing conditions figures for the referenced wetlands are provided as Attachments 1-3. We trust that the information presented here sufficiently answers your comments pertaining to this project. If you have additional questions or require more information, please contact Bill Shiels or me at (425) 861-7550. Thank you. Sincerely, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Jennifer M. Marriott, PWS Senior Ecologist cc: Mr. Tom Messmer, FWC, LLC File Attachments: 1. Wetland Rating for Wetlands KH, KI, KJ, KK, KL, and KM 2. Feature Summary Table, dated 20 October 2017 3. Existing Conditions Map, dated 20 October 2017 Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 ATTACHMENT 1 Wetland Rating for Wetlands KH, KI, KJ, KK, KL, and KM Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, WeshiVon 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fes: (425)861-7549 Wetland name or number 'PE APIKc--14 H19-I AJ1V-k-1 V-L k-M /je-'o RATING SUMMARY —Western Washington Name of wetland Ivor ID #): G Date of site visit: _+ 110 Rated by e_lV Trained by Ecology? Yes _No Date of trainir�g�_ HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y VC__N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY X— (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I — Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score =16 -19 X—Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H M H M E) H M Landscape Potential H L H M H M Value rg M L H ® L H M L I TOTAL Score Based on ¢ 3 Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above X Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number k -P/ 1Z t� /V-P IV-G / K t+ /g 1 #-7IV- K l /�M HIGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? (N- go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. Igo to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats our wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressionalt wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). 6 go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _XThe wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), XThe water Flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, 'LThe water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO-goto5 EgS - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 '-1 Wetland name or number NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO -go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit HGM class to being rated use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope+ Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream Depressional within boundary of depression Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other Treat as class of freshwater wetland ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number KOIKC le—F ! &I KH /�-I /kj--19P /9-L IA-M /KD SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1%slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 Slope is > 2%-S% points =1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 51.2. The sail 2 in below the surface for duff laver) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 U S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > % of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > X of area points =1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12 = H _6-11= M _)C0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1-2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on me jirsr page Rating of Value If score is:—)(2-4 = H _,1= M _0 = L Record the rating on tneprsr page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 11 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetlandnameornumber_V-_DfK., % r-A-6-19rleI1kslrxlk'1-1kM%CD SLOPE WETLANDS Hvdroioeic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion I S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough {usually >'/8 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surfaceflows. lows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 0 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_3 = M Y O = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 U Ratine of Landscape Potential If score is: 1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = i No flooding problems anywhere downstream points =0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H �C 1= M 0 = L xecora me rating on meiiru puyu NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABRAT FL1NUIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = i _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if. U The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y, ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points _Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points ( j H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 W. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canorygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 <5 species points = 0 C) H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. 0 None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number��KE����K(7���/ H I.S. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M 40-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]—= % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_ + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) _ Z s 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6= H _1-3 = M - < i = L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? I H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetlond being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H _1= M __)[0 = L X Points = 0 [ Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number _ �� /,p /KG �,HI k r<�Y-S�k���La ��M/� WDFW Priority Habitats PrioritybahitaLs listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp• w w• i s &_DJUL LiMij or access the list from here: h l ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: , Old -growth west of Cascade crept -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.150 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of> 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 ATTACHMENT 2 Feature Summary Table, dated 20 October 2017 Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Wa5lwngton 98077 - Bus: (425)861-7550 Fim (425)861-7549 TAL-1572C FEATURE SUMMARY TABLE 2014 DOE Wetland Rating Square Standard Buffer # Wetland ID Cowardin HGM Habitat Acreage Footage** (feet), FWRC Ch.19 Category Score 1 AE PEM Depressions! I!I 4 0.0055 239 60 2 AF PEM Depressional III 4 0.0109 473 60 3 AG PFO Depressional III 4 0.1486 6,475 60 4 AH PSS Depressional l!I 4 0.0163 711 60 5 Al PEM Slope IV 3 0.0699 3,044 40 6 AJ PEM Slope IV 3 0.0012 51 40 7 AL PEM Slope IV 3 0.0246 1,072 40 8 AO PEM Slope IV 3 0.0018 79 40 9 AV PFO Depressional III 4 0.2831 12,332 60 10 BR PEM I ! Depressional !!!! III 5 0.0508 2,211 105 11 BS (N) PFO Depression! III 4 0.0616 2,683 60 12 BS (S) PEM Depressional IV 3 0.0044 192 40 13 DE PFO Depressional III 3 0.4948 21,554 60 14 DF PFO Depressional III 3 0.0019 81 60 15 DG PFO Depressional III 3 0.0253 1,103 60 16 DH PFO Depressional III 3 0.0062 271 60 17 DI PFO Depressional III 3 0.0052 227 60 18 DJ PFO Depressional III 3 0.1453 6,331 60 19 El PFO Depressional IV 3 0.0040 175 40 20 EJ PSS Depressional [II 3 0.0053 231 60 21 EK PSS Depressional III 3 0.0041 179 60 22 EL PSS Depressional III 3 0.0121 529 60 23 EM PSS Depressional III 3 0.0070 306 60 24 FA PSS Slope IV 4 0.0499 2,174 40 25 FB PSS Depressional III 4 0.2059 8,967 60 26 FD PFO Depressional IV 3 0.0157 686 40 27 FE PFO Depressional III 5 0.0074 �324 105 ** Reflects on -site acreage for wetlands that continue off -site 10/2012017 10:04 AM TAL-1572C FEATURE SUMMARY TABLE # Wetland ID Cowardin HGM 2014 DOE Wetland Rating Acreage Square Footage— Standard Buffer (feet), FWRC Ch.19 Category Habitat Score 28 FF PSS Depressional IV 3 0.0225 978 40 29 GB (N) PSS Depressional III 3 0.0775 3,377 60 30 KD PEM Slope IV 3 0.0407 1,771 40 31 KF PEM Slope IV 3 0.0087 378 40 32 KG PEM Slope IV 3 0.0003 15 40 33 KH PEM Slope IV 3 0.0010 45 40 34 KI PEM Slope IV 3 0.0013 58 40 35 KJ PEM Slope IV 3 0.0008 37 40 36 KK PEM Slope IV 3 0.0003 12 40 37 KL PEM Slope IV 3 0.0010 44 40 38 KM PEM Slope IV 3 0.0003 14 40 39 BN (offsite) PFO Depressional II 6 0.9538 41,548 165 40 KB (offsite) PEM Slope IV 3 0.0003 15 40 41 KC (offsite) PEM Slope IV 3 0.0072 314 40 42 KN (offsite) PEM Slope IV 3 0.0156 678 40 WETLANDS WITHIN SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ZONE # Wetland ID Cowardin HGM Acreage Square ` Footage* Standard Buffer (feet), FWRC Ch.15 43 BD (N) PFO/PSS Depressional 4.3983 191,590 100 44 BK PSS Slope 0.0028 120 0 45 BL PSS Slope 0.0467 2,035 0 46 BE (offsite) PFO Slope 0.0053 231 0 47 BF (offsite) PSS Slope 0.0564 2,455 0 48 PG (BJ) PFO/PSS Slope 0.4075 17,752 100 ** Reflects on -site acreage for wetlands that continue off -site 10/20/2017 10:04 AM ATTACHMENT 3 Existing Conditions Map, dated 20 October 2017 Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast ■ Woodinville, Washington 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 ✓LV I IVI\ y , vvnr✓: n, ci ,rv,� i i i, i�r-�irv� z . �r.� �. S 321 st St c The Commons . At Federal Way 5 3?41h St a o PROJECT ,AREA �a i cr s 33uu, st NORTH t i LAKE s n s 53,31ct ndS s �4P SB i v S 333rd St S 3361h St �,`' to S 336th S1 ,o ix W 7 ri m a m � C f/1 U KITTS CORNER a d aaihSi S 3a t sti4` Sa S 342nd St o• Q Pacific Bonsai Museumet s 3e4tr, U) Cb �� 0 tP C, Ith St n o ^! r DRIVING DIREGTION5: I. FROM DOWNTOWN SEATTLE TAKE 1-5 SOUTH FOR 10.5 MILES. 2. USE THE 2ND LANE FROM THE RIGHT TO TAKE EXIT 145 FOR 5 320TH ST TOWARD FEDERAL HAY 3. TAKE A SHARP LEFT ONTO 5 520TH ST. 4. IN 0.5 MILES TURN RI O HT ONTO HEYERHAEU5ER HAY 5 5. YOUR DESTINATION HILL BE ON THE RIGHT. NORTH 5GALE: NT5 TALASAEA 's CONSULTANTS, INC. Resource do Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast Woodinville, Washington 98077 Bus (425)861-7550 - Fax (425)861-7549 VIGINITY MAP 4 DRIVING DIPEGTIONS MH/ABS 15'72G REFERENCE NH5-2011-T13D APPLICANT I F1=DERAL WAY GAMPU5. LLG LAT. & LONG. 4-1.30-10°-122.2cl53° PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARGEL5 G, H AND 1) DATE I-26-201-1 I REVISED 10-20-201-1 PURPOSE: EXISTING GONDITION5 ADDRESS: 32901 HEYERHAEUSER HAY SOUTH FIGURE I OF CITY i'EDl RAL WAY COUNTY KING STATE WA IN UNNAMED WETLANDS :/DRAWING11500-1599/TAL1572/1572C\P1ans\TAL-1572c BLA Figures (2017-10-20)pyright - Talasaea Consultants, FNC. (C SEGTION TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 L I.H. r f PARCEL - ■� ' #1621041056 - / r '? ! 11 r _4 i= y �,,�/ i.. PARCEL H i If -'+';,+ a #16210401015 ! _ ,r ,r1- II •, 1, � tarp �: �__ +,' / 11 • II �; NOTES: I. ONLY FEATURES LOCATED IN THE PROJECT AREA OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PARCEL BOUNDARIE5 ARE SHOWN. TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC, Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast Woodinville, Washington 98077 Bus (425)861-7550 — Fax (425)861-7549 PARGEL MAP PARCEL #162104MO50 t / ! / r! ,! r NORTH LAKE PARCEL H PLAN LEGEND — - - — PRO-ErT AREA — — — —PROPERTY LINE EXI5TIN6 MTLAND ---------NORTH MICE - OWH STREAM ormeRuNE EX15TIHS CONTOUR C RAPH I G SCALE NORTH ( IN FEET) O25�0 1000 SGALE: 1"=500' REFERENCE APPLICANT NHS-2011-TBD FEDERAL HAY CAMPUS, LLG PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARGEL5 G, H AND PURPOSE: EXISTING GONDITION5 ADDRESS: 32901 HEYERHAEU5ER HAY 5OUTH CITY COUNTY STATE I IN =EDEIRAL NAY KING I HA UNNAMED 6 HH/ABS 11572G LAT. & LONG. 47,5070°,-122.2953° DATE REVISED 1-26-2017 10-20-2( FIGURE # OF rp Z:IDRAWING/1500-1599/TAL1572\1572C/P1ans/TAL-1572c BLA Figures (2017-10-20)(Chqppyright - Talasaea Consultants, INC. SEGTIOF j, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 A.H. L l A LEC END TYPE DESCRIPTION PEMI/55F PALUSTRINE EMERGENT PERSISTENT/SGRUB-SHRUB SEMIPERMANENTLY FLOODED P55/EMIG PALUSTRINE SGRUB-SHRUB/EMEROENT PERSISTENT SEASONALLY FLOODED SOURCE: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, (NOV 201(b). NATIONAL HETLANDS INVENTORY HEBSITE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, HASHINOTON D.G. http://www.fw5.gov/wetlands/data/wetland-Gode5 html NORTH SCALE: NT5 TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Hear Creek Road Northeast Wodinville, Washington 98077 Buso(425)881-7550 — Fax (425)881-7549 ILFEDERAL FIGURE TITLE NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP DRA N MW/ABS I TAL# 115126 REFERENCE APPLICANT FEDERAL WAY GAMPUS, LLG 413O-f0 LONG. PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARGELS G H AND 1) HATE 1-26-201-1 RSYISED I10-20-2011 PURPOSE: EXISTING GONDITIONS ADDRESS: 32901 WEYERHAEUSER WAY SOUTH FIGURE OF CITY WAY COUNTY KING STATE WA IN UNNAMED HETLANDS51 Z:(DRAWING/1500-1599/TAL1572/1572C/P1ans\TAL-1572c BLA Figures (2017-10-20] gyri L - Tsiasaea Consultants, INC. C SECTION �; TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 1 �d.M. LEGEND TYPE DESCRIPTION, 5LOPES AgB ALDERWOOD GRAVELLY SANDY LOAM, O TO 8 PERGENT SLOPES AgG ALDERWOOD GRAVELLY SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERGENT SLOPES W WATER SOURCE: SOIL SURVEY STAFF, NATURAL RE50URGES GONSERVATION SERVIGE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRIGULTURE, WEB SOIL SURVEY. AVAILABLE ONLINE AT http://webroll5urvey.nrc-5.u5da.gov/. AGGESSED (I/2(9/201-7). NORTH 5GALE: NTS FIGURE TITLE DRAWN I TA14 NRG5 MAP MW/AB5 11572G TALA S AE A REFERENCE APPLICANT LAT. & LONG. NW5-201-7-TBDI FEDERAL WAY GAMPU5, LLG 47.3070°-122.2g53° CONSULTANTS, INC. PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARGEL5 G, H AND 1) DATE I REVISED Resource & Environmental Planning PURPOSE: EX15TINO GONDITION5 1-26-2011 10-20-2017 oodinville, Washington 980 d Bear Creek Road Northeast WooADDRESS: 3290I WEYERHAEU5ER SOUTH WAY FIGURE # W Bus (425)881-7550 —Fax (425)8)881-7549 CITY COUNTY STATE IN OF FEDERAL WAY KING WA UNNAMED WETLANDSrp Z:\DRAWING\1500-1599\TAL1572\1572C\Plans\TAL-1572c 13LA Figures (2017-10-20)®r�ppyright - Talasaea Consultants, INC. C r:4 L. I /HL-EKE i f �HL-EL HL-EM N �• is -DGL;� ',' HL-D —AV 11 ;I,qL - M 1 , BR -AG HL-ICI 44 L4 - - u- , . . WL-KN .J 71 VA L-AH HL AE_ + -----=L ---- ---al {=--------- ............. WL-FA wL-FI3 ' r ) WL FD NcFF , I: r _. NE25-11.� � + r - ---- - - T] OFF , ,- wL BK �S WL SL . . 1 �l ti Ilj! f ANORTH LAKE L VC -BD NORTH (GONTINUES OFF 51TE) �• ` y� air 7 ,•1 TALASAEA I • .. e I ' CONSULTANTS, INC. Resource & Environmental Planning I I 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast Woodinv61Washington 98077 Bus (•S25)861-7550 - Fax (425)091-7549 r-; -- - -•---i I AG l � � l � • 1 STRIJGTt1RE STORM WATER \ OUTFALL POND ! !r ! JAH,! 6-5 ' �AF ! L - f_ AE SHALE_ APPROX. STREAM ! 1 5TREAM -- (LOGATION LAG ,L- --�—J eat ANPENUIx 13 FOR vEn Al v FEATURE SLAY TABLE PLAN LEs9� — : r — PRO.EGT AREA PROPERTY LINE EXISTING P&-rLAND _ — — —-1•-ETLAM BUFFER •� —STREAM CENTERLINE STREAM BUFFER - EXISTING o0woUR - - - - - - - - - NORTN LAKE - 014W -__------100 PT PRO.lEGT AREA 0FP5ET NOTE- 5-I. ONLY FEATURE5 LOGATED IN THE PROJEGT AREA OR WITHIN TOO FEET OF THE PARGEL BOUNDARIE5 ARE SHOWN. 2. WETLANDS BD NORTH, PG(BJ) AND BN GONTINUE OFF SITE. C RAPH I G SCALE NORTH ( IN FEET D 250 500 1000 5GALE: I "=500' rmSTING GONDITION5 MAP MH/ABS 11512G REFERENCE APPLICANT LAT. & LONG. NWS-2011-TBD FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS LLG 41.50i0°•-122.2g55' PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARGEL5 G H AND 1) DATE R PURPOSE: EXI5TING GONDITION5 1-26-201� J107SE1) 0-20 ADDRESS: 32901 HEYERHAEU5ER WAY 50UTH FIGURE # CITY COUNTY I STATE I IN OF rp =EDERAL WAY KING WA UNNAMED WETLANDS rp Cg) Copyright - Talasaea Consultants, INC. When Recorded Return to: McCullough Hill Leary, P.S. 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6600 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Courtney A. Kaylor DECLARATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT Grantor: Grantee: Abbrev. Legal Desc: Assessor's Tax Parcel #s: Reference #: Federal Way Campus, LLC Federal Way Campus, LLC Portion SE 1/4 Section 16, T 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. Complete legal in Exhibit A and Exhibit B 1621049013 N/A THIS DECLARATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT ("Agreement") is made this >0 day of 2017, by Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("Declarant"). Recitals A. Declarant is the owner of the real property located in Federal Way, Washington and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Burdened Property"). B. Declarant is the owner of the real property located in Federal Way, Washington legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto (`Benefitted Property") C. Declarant is adjusting the boundaries of the Burdened and Benefitted Properties by City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. 17-100455-SU currently under review by the City. D. Declarant wishes to establish an easement to allow the users of the Benefitted Property access over and to place utilities under a portion of the Burdened Property, on the terms and conditions set forth herein. -1- Declaration Now therefore, the Declarant subjects the Benefitted Property and the Burdened Property to the following easement, covenants and conditions: 1. Access and Utilities Easement. Declarant hereby declares and subjects the Burdened Property to a perpetual nonexclusive easement (the "Easement"), which is appurtenant to and runs with the Benefitted Property, over, across and under the real property legally described in Exhibit C and depicted in Exhibit D (the "Easement Area") for the purpose of ingress and egress between the Benefitted Property and Weyerhaeuser Way South and for utilities. 2. Maintenance of Easement Area. Declarant, as owner of the Benefitted Property, may construct a driveway and utilities within the Easement Area (collectively, "Improvements"), as approved by the City of Federal Way. Declarant, as owner of the Benefitted Property, shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits and approvals for construction of the Improvements, restoring the Easement Area to as good or better a condition as existed prior to the construction of the Improvements, and maintaining the Improvements located within the Easement Area in good and safe condition. 3. Indemnification. Declarant, as owner of the Benefitted Property, shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Declarant, as owner of the Burdened Property, from any and all claims, loss, damage, costs (including the cost of litigation) and liability resulting from any actual or alleged injury to person or property which may arise as the result of the Declarant's use of the Easement Area as owner of the Benefitted Property. 4. No Dedication to the Public. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be a gift or dedication of any portion of the Easement Area or the improvements thereon to the general public or for any public use. 5. Reservation. Declarant, as owner of the Burdened Property, reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any and all purposes which do not materially interfere with the use and operation of the Easement Area and are not otherwise inconsistent with the rights herein contained. 6. Assignment-, Bindinp, Effect. The Easement and rights granted herein and the conditions herein contained shall be a covenant running with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Declarant and its successors and assigns. 7. No Merger. It is the intention of the Declarant that the Easement and rights granted herein and covenants herein contained shall not extinguish or terminate by operation of the doctrine of merger or otherwise by reason of existing or future common ownership of the Benefitted Property and Burdened Property. 8. Miscellaneous. Time is of the essence hereof. The headings contained herein shall not be used to interpret the provisions hereof. This Easement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State of Washington. Jurisdiction and venue for any action -2- commenced to enforce this Agreement shall be the County of King, State of Washington. This Agreement may not be modified except by a written agreement signed by Declarant as owner of the Benefitted Party and as owner of the Burdened Party. Declarant's failure to enforce any provision hereof shall not constitute waiver thereof in any future instance. If any provision hereof is held to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. DECLARANT: FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, By: ZO'ONN-0-11 Print name: T.C. Messmer Title: Vice President— Special Projects -3- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that r G . e'R(--5-Sryt e-vr is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the \/i C-e_ Pyres i d.e�t of a Delaware limited liability company, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED:. , Ya , 2017. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at ..�•, Print name: f�c,�A �_ 1j,r,,�1 Commission expires: (o -i—o IM Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No.1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLc EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF BURDENED PROPERTY That portion of Sections 15 and 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southwesterly corner of the East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan as recorded in Volume 191 of Plats, Pages 39 through 45, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 19990916001397, also being a point on the southeasterly margin of Interstate 5; THENCE along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W, 262.01 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, N 73°20'26" W, 25.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W, 744.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 530.85 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 11,335.00 feet, through a central angle of 02°41'00" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 13°58'34" W, 983.01 feet to the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 16; THENCE along said south line AND the south line of Government Lot 1 of Section 16, S 88.1911 " E, 1348.40 feet to a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 56°06'04" E, through a central angle of 03°31'01 "; ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 253.838.6113tel Everett, WA 98208 425.297.9900te1 3D Laser Scanning GIS 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694 tall free www.esrncivil.corn 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 2 THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 52035'03" W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 42.23 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1257.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 52035'03" E, through a central angle of 01 055'30"; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 50039'33" W 15.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing N 50039'33" W, 37.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet, through a central angle of 04043'38" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 71 *45'10 to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 83023'43" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northwesterly 450.72 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 655.00 feet, through a central angle of 39°25'36" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northerly 267.17 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 490.00 feet, through a central angle of 31 °14'24" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE northerly 109.54 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 515.00 feet, through a central angle of 1201111 " to a point of tangency; THENCE N 24011'27" E, 710.81 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northeasterly 297.69 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1525.00 feet, through a central angle of 11'11'04" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northeasterly 325.03 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 535.00 feet, through a central angle of 34048'34" to a point of compound curvature; Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 3 THENCE easterly 595.57 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 340.00 feet, through a central angle of 100021'48" to a point of tangency; THENCE S 09027'07" E, 11.23 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE southeasterly 81.34 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 77040'28" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE easterly 175.07 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 500.00 feet, through a central angle of 20003'42" to a point of tangency; THENCE S 67003'53" E, 40.58 feet to a point of curvature on said northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South: THENCE along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 239.28 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1030.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 67°03'53" E, through a central angle of 13018'38" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, S 09°37'29" W, 484.24 feet to a point of curvature; thence continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 770.34 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1170.00 feet, through a central angle of 37043'27" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, S 47°20'56" W, 141.77 feet; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 42039'04" W, 7.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, S 47°20'56" W, 141.29 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 58.71 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1237.00 feet, through a central angle of 02'43'10"; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 45022" 4" W, 7.00 to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 43.31 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1244.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 45022" 4" E, through a central angle of 01 059'41 "; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 47021'55" W, 28.00 feet to a point of curvature; Federal Way Campus, LLG September 19, 2017 Page 4 THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 73.13 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1272.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 47021'55" E, through a central angle of 03017'38" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2,096,100 square feet (48.120 acres), more or less. isIesm-jobs1188610011016-00101docu mentlld-002.doc Zan Q9-/9 IN Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No.1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 TING E EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITTED PROPERTY :: ra That portion of Sections 15 and 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the southwesterly corner of the East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan as recorded in Volume 191 of Plats, Pages 39 through 45, inclusive, under King County Recording No. 19990916001397, also being a point on the southeasterly margin of Interstate 5; THENCE along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W, 262.01 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, N 73°20'26" W, 25.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 16°39'34" W, 744.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 160.90 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 11,335.00 feet, through a central angle of 00°48'48" to the south line of the northeast quarter of Section 16 (also known as the southerly line of Lot 7 of City of Federal Way Boundary Line Adjustment No. BLA 99-002 as recorded under Recording No. 9905129004), being a point on said curve AND the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, southwesterly 369.95 feet along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 11,335.00 feet, through a central angle of 01 "52'12" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said southeasterly margin, S 13058'34" W, 983.01 feet to the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 16; ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 334008th Ave S, Ste 205 10105E Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 253.838.6113tel Everett, WA 98208 425.297.9900tell 3DLaser Scanning GIS 800345 694toll free 800.345.5694 toll free www.esmcivil.com 253.838.7,04 fax 425.297.9903. fax Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 2 THENCE along said south line AND the south line of Government Lot 1 of Section 16, S 88-19-11" E, 1348.40 feet to a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non - tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 56006'04" E, through a central angle of 03°31'01 "; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 52035'03" W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, northeasterly 42.23 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1257.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 52035'03" E, through a central angle of 01 055'30"; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly margin, N 50°39'33" W, 15.00 feet; THENCE continuing N 50°39'33" W, 37.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet, through a central angle of 04043'38" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 71045'10 to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 83023'43" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northwesterly 450.72 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 655.00 feet, through a central angle of 39°25'36" to a point of compound curvature; THENCE northerly 267.17 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 490.00 feet, through a central angle of 31 014'24" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE northerly 109.54 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 515.00 feet, through a central angle of 12011 " 1 " to a point of tangency; THENCE N 24011'27" E, 301.93 feet to said south line of the northeast quarter of Section 16; THENCE along said south line, N 88023'02" W, 640.70 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 3 TOGETHER WITH that portion of said Section 16, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the east quarter corner of said Section 16; THENCE along the east line of said section, S 00°54'31" W, 280.07 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing along said east line, S 00°54'31 " W, 323.27 feet; THENCE N 89005'29" W, 45.00 feet; THENCE S 00054'31 " W, 97.00 feet; THENCE N 89005'29" W, 75.00 feet; THENCE S 00054'31" W, 140.00 feet; THENCE S 84038'11 " E, 84.08 feet to the shoreline of North Lake; THENCE along said shoreline, the following courses: S 1003333" W, 34.75 feet; S 14050'51 " W, 31.55 feet; S 23°47'48" W, 68.08 feet: S 26000'29" W, 88.68 feet; S 28°36'54" W, 68.59 feet; S 22-20-40" W, 41.36 feet; S 10-06-33" W, 79.32 feet; S 19056'27" E, 48.12 feet; S 1702215" E, 45.88 feet to the northerly line of that State Plat of said Section 16 as recorded in Volume 41 of Plats, Pages 30 through 32, inclusive, records of King County, Washington; Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page 4 THENCE along said northerly line, N 88019'11 " W, 570.29 feet to a point of curvature on the easterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way South; THENCE along said easterly margin, northeasterly 227.76 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1166.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 53050'34" E, through a central angle of 11'11'30" to a point of tangency; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 47020'56" E, 141.29 feet; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 42039'04" W, 4.00 feet; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, N 47020'56" E, 141.77 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE continuing along said easterly margin, northeasterly 767.41 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1230.00 feet, through a central angle of 35044'50" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 26.2 acres, more or less, with the portion westerly of Weyerhaeuser Way S. being 922,550 s.f. (21.179 acres) more or less and with the portion easterly of Weyerhaeuser Way S. being approximately 5.0 acres. is lesm-jobs1188610011016-0010ldocu m entl Id-003.doc Z2917 oI 1-2 Federal Way Campus, LLC Job No. 1886-001-016 September 19, 2017 CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLc EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA That portion of the southeast quarter of Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., City of Federal Way, King County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the intersection of the easterly margin of Interstate 5 with the south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 16; THENCE along said south line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter and along the south line of Government Lot 1 of said Section 16, S 88°1911" E, 1348.40 feet a point of curvature on the northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way S.; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, the following courses: northeasterly 75.99 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1238.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 56°06'04" E, through a central angle of 03031'01"; N 52-35-03" W, 19.00 feet to a point of curvature; northeasterly 42.23 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1257.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 52°35'03" E, through a central angle of 01 °55'30"; N 50-39-33" W, 15.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE continuing N 50039'33" W, 37.25 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE northwesterly 39.60 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 480.00 feet, through a central angle of 04°43'38" to a point of reverse curvature; ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 253.838.6113tel 425.297.9900tel 30Laser Scanning GIS 800.345 . 5694 toll free 800.345.5694 toll free www.esmcivil.com 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax Federal Way Campus, LLC September 19, 2017 Page Two THENCE westerly 75.14 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 71045'10" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE westerly 509.43 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 350.00 feet, through a central angle of 83°23'43"; THENCE N 55042'38" E, 60.00 feet to a point of curvature; THENCE easterly 422:10 feet along the arc of a non -tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 290.00 feet, the radius point of which bears N 55042'38" E, through a central angle of 83°23'43" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE easterly 150.28 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 120.00 feet, through a central angle of 7104510" to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE southeasterly 34.65 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 420.00 feet, through a central angle of 04°43'38" to a point of tangency; THENCE S 50039'33" E, 38.67 feet to said northwesterly margin of Weyerhaeuser Way S.; THENCE along said northwesterly margin, southwesterly 60.02 feet along the arc of a non - tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 1272.00 feet, the radius point of which bears S 47°57'20" E, through a central angle of 02'42'13" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 39,200 square feet (0.90 acres), more or less. See attached Exhibit D. Written By: CAF h esm-jo bs1188610011016-00101 docu mentlld-001.doc Zor 7- 09 --19 EXHIBIT D DEPICTION OF EASEMENT AREA n A PORTION OF THE SE 1 /4 OF SECTION 16, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M., CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON h , SCALE: 1 "=300' J 3 CITY OF FEDERAL .WAY Qo BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT +- NO. 17-100455-SU LOT I LOT 3 EASEMENT AREA POINT OF COMMENCING TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING � SOUTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF �, ��� THE SE 1 /4 AND SOUTH LINE OF GOV. LOT 1 OF SECTION 16 c') Q� p u 330 JOB NO. 1886-001-016 DRAWING NAME SR-02 DATE : 2017-09-19 DRAWN C.A.F. SHEET 1 OF 1 Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAl GUARANTEE Issued by First American Title Insurance Company 818 Stewart Street, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98101 Title Officer.- Chantale A. Stiller Anderson Phone: (206)728-0400 FAX.- (206)448-6348 FirstAmencan Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAl Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.: 1 `rt .N M k. k r � f �w First American Title Insurance company National Commercial Services 818 Stewart Street, Suite 800, Seattle, WA 98101 (206)728-0400 - (800)526-7544 FAX (206)448-6348 Chantale A. Stiller -Anderson Terri Nugent (206)448-6286 (206)615-3041 cstiller@firstam.com tnugent@firstam.com SIXTH SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE LIABILITY $ 2,000.00 ORDER NO.: NCS-813236-WAl FEE $ 750.00 TAX $ 72.00 YOUR REF.: KG Inv Federal Way First American Title Insurance Company a Corporation, herein called the Company Subject to the Liability Exclusions and Limitations set forth below and in Schedule A. GUARANTEES Federal Way Campus LLC herein called the Assured, against loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. 3. This Guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17, R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. Dated: September 11, 2017 at 7:30 A.M. First American Tide Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) SCHEDULE A The assurances referred to on the face page are: A. Title is vested in: Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WA1 Page No.: 2 B. That according to the Company's title plant records relative to the following described real property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said real property or any portion thereof, other than those shown below under Record Matters. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this Guarantee: 1. Unpatented Mining Claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. DESCRIPTION: PARCEL G (162104-9056-07): PORTIONS OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15 AND OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15, SAID POINT BEING A 2 INCH IRON PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE WITH A TACK, IN A CASE, PER THAT RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9705229013, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION SOUTH 00041'47" WEST, 1520.70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88022'19" WEST 1491.17 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF INTERSTATE 5; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, SOUTH 16°39'28" WEST 262.30 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, NORTH 73�020'32" WEST 25.00 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, SOUTH 16039'28" WEST 905.14 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 88023-14" EAST 1819.12 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 32ND AVENUE SOUTH (AKA WEYERHAEUSER WAY SOUTH); THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, NORTH 09°37'30" EAST 252.33 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, NORTHEASTERLY 729.84 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1030.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40035'55" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, NORTH 50013'25" EAST 275.46 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 94.69 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 670.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08005'51"; FirstAmencan Tide Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAl Page No.: 3 THENCE NORTH 89005'50" WEST 647.96 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 7 OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. BLA 99-002, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9905129004) PARCEL H (162104-9013-09): GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH ADJOINING; AND TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF SR 5 (P.S.H. #1); EXCEPT THE NORTH 320 FEET OF THE WEST 340.33 FEET OF THE EAST 370.33 FEET; AND EXCEPT BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE SOUTH 00053'59" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 A DISTANCE OF 668.34 FEET TO THE MEANDER CORNER OF NORTH LAKE AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE 182 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SHORE LINE OF NORTH LAKE; THENCE NORTH 84020'12" WEST 120.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00053'59" EAST 140 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89006'01" EAST 75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00053'59" EAST 97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89006'01" EAST 45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00053'59" WEST 65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1978 UNDER RECORDING NO. 7809150862 FOR 32ND DRIVE SOUTH; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 17, 2003 UNDER RECORDING NO. 20030917000738. PARCEL I (162104-9030-08): THE NORTH 320 FEET OF THE WEST 340.33 FEET OF THE EAST 370.33 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LYING WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH ADJOINING; EXCEPT PORTION CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1978 UNDER RECORDING NO. 7809150862 FOR 32ND DRIVE SOUTH. First American Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) RECORD MATTERS: 1. General Taxes for the year 2017. Tax Account No.: 162104-9056-07 Amount Billed: $ 87,431.70 Amount Paid: $ 43,415.85 Amount Due: $ 44,015.85 Assessed Land Value: $ 6,275,200.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 (Affects Parcel G) 2. General Taxes for the year 2017. Tax Account No.: 162104-9013-09 Amount Billed: $ 661,872.60 Amount Paid: $ 330,936.30 Amount Due: $ 330,936.30 Assessed Land Value: $ 7,060,600.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 38,676,400.00 (Affects Parcel H) 3. General Taxes for the year 2017. Tax Account No.: 162104-9030-08 Amount Billed: $ 4,653.52 Amount Paid: $ 2,326.76 Amount Due: $ 2,326.76 Assessed Land Value: $ 326,700.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 (Affects Parcel I) 4. This item has been intentionally deleted. Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAl Page No.: 4 5. Potential charges, for the King County Sewage Treatment Capacity Charge, as authorized under RCW 35.58 and King County Code 28.84.050. Said charges could apply for any property that connected to the King County Sewer Service area on or after February 1, 1990. Note: Properties located in Snohomish County and Pierce County may be subject to the King County Sewage Treatment Capacity Charges. To verify charges contact: (206) 296-1450 or CapChargeEscrow@kingcounty.gov. 6. Facility Charges, if any, including but not limited to hook-up, or connection charges and latecomer charges for water or sewer facilities of Federal Way Water and Sewer District as disclosed by instrument recorded under recording no. 8905120210. None now due or payable. 7. Easement rights and maintenance agreements, if any, for utilities which may have been granted in vacated streets and alleys prior to the vacations. FirstAmencan Tide Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAI Page No.: 5 8. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: June 27, 1931 as 2678839 In Favor of: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, a Washington corporation For: Electric transmission and/or distribution system Affects: Parcel G 9. Provisions in King County Superior Court Cause No. 385515 filed June 25, 1947 fixing the level of North Lake. (Affects Parcel H) 10. Reservations contained in Deed from the State of Washington recorded under recording no. 4980400, reserving all oil, gases, coal, ores, minerals, fossils, etc., and the right of entry for opening, developing and working the same. The document specifically provides that, "No rights shall be exercised under this reservation by the State, its successors or assigns, until provision has been made by the State, it successors or assigns to pay the owner of the land upon which the rights herein reserved to the State, it successors or assigns, or sought to be exercised, full payment for all damages sustained by said owner, by reason of entering upon said land." (Affects Parcels H and I) 11. This item has been intentionally deleted. 12. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: August 13, 1963 as 5623093 In Favor of: Washington Natural Gas Company For: Pipelines Affects: Parcel I 13. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: September 22, 1969 as 6567596 In Favor of: Olympic Pipeline Company For: Transmission of petroleum products Affects: Parcels G and H 14. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises for 32nd Drive South as granted by deed recorded September 15, 1978 under recording no. 7809150862. 15. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 8007080485 In Favor of: Water District No. 124, King County For: Water pipeline and lines Affects: all of said premises and other property 16. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: First American Tide Insurance Company Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAl Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.: 6 Recording Information: 8010140816 In Favor of: Lakehaven Sewer District For: Sewer mains Affects: Parcel G, H and I 17. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Agreement" regarding construction of sewer facilities recorded February 18, 1994 as Instrument No. 9402182159 of Official Records. By and between Federal Way Water and Sewer District and Weyerhauser Company, Corporated. The lien created in Paragraph 26 of said agreement was released by instrument recorded under Recording No. 9512261712. 18. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 94-219" establishing zoning designation recorded October 26, 1994 as 9410260933 of Official Records. Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded May 13, 2003 as 20030513002214 of Official Records. 19. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the Boundary Line Adjustment No. BLA 99-0002 recorded under Recording No. 9905129004, in King County, Washington. (Affects Parcel G) 20. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 19990903000827 In Favor of: Lakehaven Utility District For: Affects: Sewer facilities Parcel H 21. The terms and provisions contained in the document entitled "Bargain and Sale Deed" recorded February 9, 2016 as 20160209001433 of Official Records. 22. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor/Trustor: Federal Way Campus, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Grantee/Beneficiary: CPIF Lending, LLC, a Washington limited liability company Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company Amount: $50,000,000.00 Recorded: February 9, 2016 Recording Information: 20160209001434 Affects: The land and other property. The Deed of Trust/Mortgage was Partially reconveyed as to other property by instrument recorded July 13, 2017 under recording no. 20170713000509. FirstAmencan Tide Insurance Company Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAI Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.: 7 23. A financing statement recorded February 9, 2016 as 20160209001435 of Official Records. Debtor: Federal Way Campus, LLC Secured party: CPIF Lending, LLC Affects: The land and other property. 24. Rights of the general public to the unrestricted use of all the waters of a navigable body of water not only for the primary purpose of navigation, but also for corollary purposes; including (but not limited to) fishing, boating, bathing, swimming, water skiing and other related recreational purposes, as those waters may affect the tidelands, shorelands or adjoining uplands and whether the level of the water has been raised naturally or artificially to a maintained or fluctuating level, all as further defined by the decisional law of this state. (Affects all of the premises subject to such submergence) (Affects Parcel H) 25. Such rights and easements for navigation and fishery which may exist over that portion of said land lying beneath the waters of North Lake. (Affects Parcel H) 26. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any, rights of vendors and security agreement on personal property and rights of tenants, and secured parties to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. 27. This item has been intentionally deleted. 28. This item has been intentionally deleted. 29. This item has been intentionally deleted. 30. This item has been intentionally deleted. 31. This item has been intentionally deleted. 32. This item has been intentionally deleted. 33. This item has been intentionally deleted. 34. This item has been intentionally deleted. 35. This item has been intentionally deleted. 36. This item has been intentionally deleted. 37. This item has been intentionally deleted. 38. This item has been intentionally deleted. 39. This item has been intentionally deleted. First American Title Insurance Company r Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAl Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.: 8 40. This item has been intentionally deleted. 41. This item has been intentionally deleted. 42. This item has been intentionally deleted. 43. This item has been intentionally deleted. 44. This item has been intentionally deleted. 45. This item has been intentionally deleted. 46. This item has been intentionally deleted. 47. This item has been intentionally deleted. 48. This item has been intentionally deleted. 49. This item has been intentionally deleted. 50. This item has been intentionally deleted. 51. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 8406060941 In Favor of: King County For: Slopes Affects: parcels bordering South 336th Street and 32nd Drive South in Sections 16 and 21 52. This item has been intentionally deleted. 53. This item has been intentionally deleted. 54. This item has been intentionally deleted. FirstAmencan Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) INFORMATIONAL NOTES Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAl Page No.: 9 A. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. FirstAmencan Title Insurance Company Form No. 14 Guarantee No.: NCS-813236-WAI Subdivision Guarantee (4-10-75) Page No.: 10 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that specific assurance are provided in this Guarantee, the Company assumes no llability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, Ilens, encumbrances, adverse Balms or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or In Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, lien, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the tines of the land expressly described in this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth In said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the Invalidity or potential Invalidity of any judicial or non-judiciat proceeding which Is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in this Guarantee. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the land described or referred to In this Guarantee, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in this Guarantee, nor any right, tile, Interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records" : records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of Imparting constructive notice or matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant, An Assured shall notify the Company promptly In writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice Is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall In no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, Interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which In its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or Interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not It shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee, if the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise Its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, In its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Companys expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid In any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which In the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company Is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to fumish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. 5. Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the farts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of less or damage shalt describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, Inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant Its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda In the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the Loss or Damage. All Information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company, pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, It is necessary in the adminisbakon of the dalm. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. Form No. 1282 (Rev. 12/15/95) First American Title Insurance Company 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim Assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The Liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in this Guarantee; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage Assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance Assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter Assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the titre, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. All payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tanto. 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulatiohs, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Liability is $1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when the amount of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to the Company at 2 First American Way. Bldg. 2, Santa Ana, CA. 92707. Form No. 1252 (Rev. 12/15/95) FirstAmencan Title Insurance Company CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CObft4UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RESUBMITTAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: 9-25-17 TO: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District FROM: Stacey Welsh, Senior Rfan-nel FOR DRC MTG. ON: No DRC, please provide any comments/conditions by 1014 FILE NUMBER(s): 17-100455-SU RELATED FILE NOS.: 16-104996-SU (Binding Site Plan -on hold) PROJECT NAME: Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment PROJECT ADDRESS: 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S ZONING DISTRICT: Corporate Park (CP-1) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Adjustment of boundary lines of 3 parcels to locate existing Tech Center and parking on its own lot. LAND USE PERMITS: Boundary Line Adjustment PROJECT CONTACT: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8th Ave South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 MATERIALS RESUBMITTED: Resubmittal Information Forms Revised Lot Closures Revised BLA (10 sheets) Draft Easements Updated Title Report TA LASA EA CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 September 2017 RESUBMITFE SEA' 19 2017 CF Y OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jim Harris and Stacey Welsh City of Federal Way Department of Community Development 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98003 TAL-1572C REFERENCE: Existing Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment, Federal Way, Washington SUBJECT: Response to Comments dated 22 August 2017 Dear Jim and Stacey: In response to ESA's comments regarding the Existing Conditions Report — Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment dated 22 August 2017, we are providing the following responses. As is typical with our procedure for response letters, we will be providing your comments verbatim in bold text. Our responses will follow each comment in italic text. Parcel G (King County Parcel 1621049056) Parcel G contains all or part of 17 wetlands including several wetlands in the forested area west of the Tech Center, several small wetlands west of the existing parking lots, and five smaller wetlands scattered in the northern portion of the parcel. • Comment: ESA generally agrees with the delineation and classifications of all the wetlands in this parcel. Recommendation: During the August 3, 2017 field meeting, the boundary of Wetland FE was revisited at the request of Talasaea. We observed that the delineated boundary of Wetland FE contains a small upland area. This area is dominated by upland vegetation and occurs on a topographic rise in comparison to the rest of the delineated wetland. ESA and Talasaea agreed in the field that the northern edge of the wetland should be redelineated to exclude this area of upland. Talasaea response: Talasaea staff revisited the Project Site on 10 August 2017 and completed a re-evaluation of Wetland FE. Previously agreed upon changes as determined during the 3 August 2017 on -site meeting were made, and are reflected in the Report and associated drawings. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 Jim Harris and Stacey Welsh 1 September 2017 Page 2 of 4 Parcel H (King County Parcel 1621049013) Parcel H contains all or part of 39 wetlands including several small wetlands in the northern part of the area known as "the meadow"; several wetlands in the forested area west of the Tech Center building; and four wetlands near or along the shore of North Lake (Wetlands BD north, BK, BL, and PG). We have the following comments and recommendations regarding the wetlands in Parcel H: Comment: Similar to our comments presented in our review of the Greenline Headquarters boundary line adjustment (see the Existing Conditions Report — Greenline Headquarters Boundary Line Adjustment Review technical memo dated August 18, 2017) delineations in the meadow and forested area appeared to be inconsistent during our field investigation. We noted that this area could be characterized as a wetland mosaic containing upland and wetland conditions. We further observed that some areas of the meadow appear to use a delineation method where each small feature is delineated separately, while other area of the meadow displayed a delineation method where several of these features are grouped together. In addition, during the May 25, 2017 site visit, hydric soils were observed outside of the delineated boundaries of several of the wetlands in the forested area. Recommendation: Our comments regarding wetlands in Parcel H were discussed with Talasaea's Jennifer Marriot [sic] during the August 3, 2017 field meeting. We agreed that large portions of Parcel H could be categorized as a wetland mosaic. According to the 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coasts Regions wetland mosaics area areas where wetland and upland features are too closely associated to be easily delineated separately. As mentioned above, some portions of this parcel included wetlands where uplands and wetlands were included in the wetland boundary; while in other portions of this parcel singular, small wetlands (e.g., 10 square feet) were delineated. During the field meeting, ESA and Talasaea agreed that some of these smaller wetlands occurring in the meadow and forested area should be grouped together in order to: 1) ensure that all wetland areas are included in the delineations, and 2) create a more consistent approach to delineation throughout this parcel. Regarding Parcel H, it was agreed that the following wetlands would be grouped together: Wetlands KD and KE; Wetlands AV and AW; and Wetlands AX, AY, AZ, DB, and DN. Because most of these wetlands were rated together, no changes to the ratings of the wetlands are necessary. Talasaea response: Wetland KD and KE have been merged as discussed during the 3 August 2017 site visit. However, the remainder of the wetland boundaries as discussed above differ from recommendations made in the field. We have made changes to the Report and supporting appendices as determined in the field. Overall, there has been an increase in wetland square footage beyond the recommendations discussed above. The wetland name which occurs first alphabetically was retained when wetlands were combined. The following wetlands were grouped together. (AV, AW AX, AY, AZ, and DB), (DJ, DK, DL, DM, and DN), and (KN, KO, KP, KQ, KR, and KS) which occurs off - site in the meadow. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 Jim Harris and Stacey Welsh 1 September 2017 Page 3 of 4 Comment: Based on ESA's field observations, it appears that Wetland Al could be connected to several smaller wetlands to the south (Wetlands KH, KM, KL, and KI). Based on their position in the landscape, a review of aerial photos, and conditions at the site i.e. vegetation, cracked soil) it appears that there is a hydrological connection between these wetlands as water moves from Wetland AI, around the soil berm, and to the south. Furthermore, flags from a previous delineation which included all five wetlands were observed during the May 25, 2017 site visit. Recommendation: None necessary. ESA and Talasaea discussed this comment in the field during the August 3, 2017 site visit. Talasaea biologists have visited this site several times over the past two years, during several different seasons and explained that a hydrological connection was only present in the wettest conditions. Furthermore, the delineation was also based on vegetation that was not present during any ESA site visits. Based on their knowledge and familiarity of the site, we agreed with the submitted wetland boundaries for these wetlands as five distinct wetlands. Talasaea response: Noted. No changes will be made to these wetlands. Comment: During the May 25, 2017 site visit, saturation and hydric soils were observed outside of the delineated western edge of Wetiand AV. ESA believes this wetland should extend approximately 20-30 feet east toward the road. Recommendation: During the August 3, 2017 field meeting Talasaea agreed with ESA's observations and it was agreed that this portion of the boundary should be extended. Talasaea response: Talasaea staff revisited the Project Site on 10 August 2017 and completed a re-evaluation of Wetland AV. Previously agreed upon changes as determined during the 3 August 2017 on -site meeting were made, and are reflected in the Report and associated drawings. Parcel I (King County Parcel 1621049030) Parcel I is a small parcel located near the northeast corner of the current Tech Center building. No features were mapped to occur on this parcel. ESA agrees that no features exist on this parcel and therefore, have no comments or recommendations. • Talasaea response: Noted. Offsite Wetlands • Comment: The Report includes review of eight offsite wetlands (Wetlands BN, KB, KC, KN, KP, KQ, KR, and KS). ESA reviewed these wetlands as part of the Greenline Headquarters review. ESA agreed with the majority of the delineated boundaries however, it was agreed that some of these wetlands would be combined with other wetlands to ensure accuracy. Further details can be found in the Existing Condtions Report — Greenline Headquarters Boundary Line Adjustment technical memo dated August 16, 2017. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 • Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 Jim Harris and Stacey Welsh 1 September 2017 Page 4 of 4 Recommendation: We recommend that any changes to offsite wetlands as detailed in the Greenline Headquarters memo be reflected in the Tech Center report. Talasaea response: All changes to offsite wetland boundaries as agreed upon within the Greenline Headquarters boundary line adjustment during the 3 August 2017 site visit will be included in the Tech Center Report. We trust that the information presented here sufficiently answers your comments pertaining to this project. If you have additional questions or require more information, please contact Bill Shiels or me at (425) 861-7550. Thank you. Sincerely, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Jennifer M. Marriott, PWS Senior Ecologist cc: Mr. Tom Messmer, FWC, LLC File Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98077 9 Bus: (425)861-7550 Fax: (425)861-7549 RESUBM" SEP CfT`f OF F �ERAJ. CommuNCTY CLOSURES FOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC September 19, 2017 PARCEL G PRIOR North: 116860.2825 East: 1276990.7435 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 262.01 North: 116609.2702 East: 1276915.6299 Line Course: N 73-20-26 W Length: 25.00 North: 116616.4373 East: 1276891.6792 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 744.00 North: 115903.6662 East: 1276678.3875 Curve Length: 160.90 Radius: 11335.00 Delta:0-48-48 Tangent:80.45 Chord: 160.90 Course: S 16-15-10 W Course In: S 73-20-26 E Course Out: N 74-09-14 W RP North: 112654.1203 East: 1287537.6083 End North: 115749.1936 East: 1276633.3547 Line Course: S 88-23-02 E Length: 1817.94 North: 115697.9227 East: 1278450.5716 Line Course: N 09-37-29 E Length: 252.20 North: 115946.5727 East: 1278492.7379 Curve Length:729.84 Radius: 1030.00 Delta:40-35-55 Tangent:380.99 Chord: 714.66 Course: N 29-55-27 E Course In: S 80-22-31 E Course Out: N 39-46-36 W RP North: 115774.3627 East: 1279508.2396 End North: 116565.9632 East: 1278849.2490 'Line Course: N 50-13-24 E Length: 275.46 North: 116742.2016 East: 1279060.9521 Curve Length:94.70 Radius:670.00 Delta:8-05-53 Tangent:47.43 Chord: 94.62 Course: N 46-10-28 E Course In: N 39-46-36 W Course Out: S 47-52-29 E RP North: 117257.1262 East: 1278632.2883 End North: 116807.7211 East: 1279129.2139 Line Course: N 89-05-51 W Length: 648.05 North: 116817.9285 East: 1278481.2443 Line Course: N 88-22-20 W Length: 1491.10 North: 116860.2851 East: 1276990.7460 Line Course: S 43-41-44 W Length: 0.00 North: 116860.2851 East: 1276990.7460 Area: 2,091,475 Sq Ft 48.01 Ac. PARCEL H PRIOR North: 115749.1936 East: 1276633.3547 Line Course: S 88-23-02 E Length: 1464.57 North: 115707.8887 East: 1278097.3421 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 320.02 North: 115387.9089 East: 1278092.2674 Line Course: S 88-23-02 E Length: 300.76 North: 115379.4267 East: 1278392.9077 Curve Length:678.63 Radius: 1170.00 Delta:33-13-59 Tangent:349.16 Chord: 669.16 Course: S 30-43-56 W Course In: N 75-53-03 W Course Out: S 42-39-04 E RP North: 115664.7698 East: 1277258.2363 End North: 114804.2430 East: 1278050.9491 Line Course: S 47-20-56 W Length: 141.77 North: 114708.1893 East: 1277946.6783 Line Course: N 42-39-04 W Length: 7.00 North: 114713.3377 East: 1277941.9356 Line Course: S 47-20-56 W Length: 141.29 North: 114617.6092 East: 1277838.0178 Curve Length:58.71 Radius: 1237.00 Delta:2-43-10 Tangent:29.36 Chord: 58.71 Course: S 45-59-21 W Course In: S 42-39-04 E Course Out: N 45-22-14 W RP North: 113707.8044 East: 1278676.1253 End North: 114576.8202 East: 1277795.7955 Line Course: N 45-22-14 W Length: 7.00 North: 114581.7378 East: 1277790.8139 Curve Length:43.31 Radius: 1244.00 Delta:1-59-41 Tangent:21.66 Chord: 43.31 Course: S 43-37-55 W Course In: S 45-22-14 E Course Out: N 47-21-55 W RP North: 113707.8044 East: 1278676.1253 End North: 114550.3928 East: 1277760.9309 Line Course: N 47-21-55 W Length: 28.00 North: 114569.3579 East: 1277740.3317 Curve Length:73.12 Radius: 1272.00 Delta:3-17-37 Tangent:36.57 Chord: 73.11 Course: S 40-59-16 W Course In: S 47-21-55 E Course Out: N 50-39-32 W RP North: 113707.8044 East: 1278676.1253 End North: 114514.1709 East: 1277692.3788 Line Course: S 50-39-33 E Length: 15.01 North: 114504.6556 East: 1277703.9874 Curve Length:42.23 Radius: 1257.00 Delta:1-55-30 Tangent:21.12 Chord: 42.23 Course: S 38-22-42 W Course In: S 50-39-33 E Course Out: N 52-35-03 W RP North: 113707.8028 East: 1278676.1369 End North: 114471.5501 East: 1277677.7687 Line Course: S 52-35-03 E Length: 19.00 North: 114460.0058 East: 1277692.8594 Curve Length:75.99 Radius: 1238.00 Delta: 3-31-01 Tangent: 38.01 Chord: 75.98 Course: S 35-39-26 W Course In: S 52-35-03 E Course Out: N 56-06-04 W RP North: 113707.8028 East: 1278676.1369 End North: 114398.2713 East: 1277648.5683 Line Course: N 88-19-11 W Length: 1348.40 North: 114437.8093 East: 1276300.7481 Line Course: N 13-58-34 E Length: 983.01 North: 115391.7188 East: 1276538.1620 Curve Length:369.95 Radius: 11335.00 Delta:1-52-12 Tangent:184.99 Chord: 369.93 Course: N 14-54-40 E Course In: S 76-01-26 E Course Out: N 74-09-14 W RP North: 112654.1200 East: 1287537.6065 End North: 115749.1932 East: 1276633.3529 Line Course: N 22-24-59 E Length: 0.00 North: 115749.1932 East: 1276633.3529 Area: 2,137,979 Sq Ft 49.08 Ac. PARCEL I PRIOR North: 115707.8887 East: 1278097.3421 Line Course: S 88-23-02 E Length: 353.37 North: 115697.9227 East: 1278450.5716 Line Course: S 09-37-29 W Length: 232.04 North: 115469.1489 East: 1278411.7758 Curve Length:91.71 Radius: 1170.00 Delta:4-29-28 Tangent:45.88 Chord: 91.69 Course: S 11-52-13 W Course In: N 80-22-31 W Course Out: S 75-53-03 E RP North: 115664.7661 East: 1277258.2448 End North: 115379.4230 East: 1278392.9162 Line Course: N 88-23-02 W Length: 300.76 North: 115387.9052 East: 1278092.2758 Line Course: N 00-54-31 E Length: 320.02 North: 115707.8850 East: 1278097.3506 Line Course: N 66-10-42 W Length: 0.01 North: 115707.8890 East: 1278097.3414 Area: 105,131 Sq Ft 2.41 Ac. LOT 1 - TO TPOB North: 116860.2825 East: 1276990.7435 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 262.01 North: 116609.2702 East: 1276915.6299 Line Course: N 73-20-26 W Length: 25.00 North: 116616.4373 East: 1276891.6792 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 744.00 North: 115903.6662 East: 1276678.3875 Curve Length:530.85 Radius: 11335.00 Delta: 2-41-00 Tangent: 265.47 Chord: 530.80 Course: S 15-19-04 W Course In: S 73-20-26 E Course Out: N 76-01-26 W RP North: 112654.1203 East: 1287537.6083 End North: 115391.7191 East: 1276538.1639 Line Course: S 13-58-34 W Length: 983.01 North: 114437.8097 East: 1276300.7499 Line Course: S 88-19-11 E Length: 1348.40 North: 114398.2716 East: 1277648.5701 Curve Length:75.99 Radius: 1238.00 Delta: 3-31-01 Tangent: 38.01 Chord: 75.98 Course: N 35-39-26 E Course In: S 56-06-04 E Course Out: N 52-35-03 W RP North: 113707.8031 East: 1278676.1387 End North: 114460.0062 East: 1277692.8613 Line Course: N 52-35-03 W Length: 19.00 North: 114471.5505 East: 1277677.7706 Curve Length:42.23 Radius: 1257.00 Delta:1-55-30 Tangent:21.12 Chord: 42.23 Course: N 38-22-42 E Course In: S 52-35-03 E Course Out: N 50-39-33 W RP North: 113707.8031 East: 1278676.1387 End North: 114504.6559 East: 1277703.9892 Line Course: N 50-39-33 W Length: 15.00 North: 114514.1649 East: 1277692.3884 Line Course: S 79-07-05 W Length: 0.00 North: 114514.1649 East: 1277692.3884 LOT 1 North: 114514.1643 East: 1277692.3855 Line Course: N 50-39-33 W Length: 37.25 North: 114537.7783 East: 1277663.5768 Curve Length:39.60 Radius:480.00 Delta:4-43-38 Tangent:19.81 Chord: 39.59 Course: N 48-17-44 W Course In: N 39-20-27 E Course Out: S 44-04-05 W RP North: 114909.0048 East: 1277967.8642 End North: 114564.1180 East: 1277634.0183 Curve Length:75.14 Radius:60.00 Delta:71-45-10 Tangent:43.40 Chord: 70.32 Course: N 81-48-30 W Course In: S 44-04-05 W Course Out: N 27-41-05 W RP North: 114521.0072 East: 1277592.2876 End North: 114574.1382 East: 1277564.4112 Curve Length:509.43 Radius:350.00 Delta:83-23-43 Tangent:311.81 Chord: 465.64 Course: N 75-59-14 W Course In: N 27-41-05 W Course Out: S 55-42-38 W RP North: 114884.0694 East: 1277401.7991 End North: 114686.8885 East: 1277112.6284 Curve Length:450.72 Delta: 39-25-36 Chord: 441.88 Course In: N 55-42-38 E RP North: 115055.8984 End North: 115114.5480 Curve Length:267.17 Delta: 31-14-24 Chord: 263.87 Course In: S 84-51-46 E RP North: 115070.6727 End North: 115361.2912 Curve Length: 109.54 Delta: 12-11-11 Chord: 109.33 Course In: N 53-37-22 W RP North: 115666.7371 End North: 115455.7019 Line Course: N 24-11-27 E North: 116104.0926 Curve Length:297.69 Delta: 11-11-04 Chord: 297.22 Course In: S 65-48-33 E RP North: 115479.1825 End North: 116362.0498 Curve Length:325.03 Delta: 34-48-34 Chord: 320.06 Course In: S 54-37-29 E RP North: 116052.3226 End North: 116555.6455 Curve Length:595.57 Delta: 100-21-48 Chord: 522.29 Course In: S 19-48-55 E RP North: 116235.7767 End North: 116291.6117 Line Course: S 09-27-07 E North: 116280.5341 Curve Length:81.34 Delta: 77-40-28 Radius: 655.00 Tangent: 234.70 Course: N 14-34-34 W Course Out: N 84-51-46 W East: 1277653.7908 East: 1277001.4219 Radius: 490.00 Tangent: 136.99 Course: N 20-45-26 E Course Out: N 53-37-22 W East: 1277489.4536 East: 1277094.9401 Radius: 515.00 Tangent: 54.98 Course: N 30-17-02 E Course Out: S 65-48-33 E East: 1276680.2983 East: 1277150.0739 Length: 710.81 East: 1277441.3476 Radius: 1525.00 Tangent: 149.32 Course: N 29-46-59 E Course Out: N 54-37-29 W East: 1278832.4307 East: 1277588.9798 Radius: 535.00 Tangent: 167.71 Course: N 52-46-48 E Course Out: N 19-48-55 W East: 1278025.2069 East: 1277843.8478 Radius: 340.00 Tangent: 407.82 Course: S 59-38-01 E Course Out: N 80-32-53 E East: 1277959.1040 East: 1278294.4881 Length: 11.23 East: 1278296.3323 Radius: 60.00 Tangent: 48.31 Chord: 75.25 Course: S 48-17-21 E Course In: N 80-32-53 E Course Out: S 02-52-25 W RP North: 116290.3873 East: 1278355.5177 End North: 116230.4628 East: 1278352.5097 Curve Length: 175.07 Radius:500.00 Delta:20-03-42 Tangent:88.44 Chord: 174.18 Course: S 77-05-45 E Course In: S 02-52-25 W Course Out: N 22-56-07 E RP North: 115731.0915 East: 1278327.4433 End North: 116191.5653 East: 1278522.2866 Line Course: S 67-03-53 E Length: 40.58 North: 116175.7518 East: 1278559.6586 Curve Length:239.28 Radius: 1030.00 Delta:13-18-38 Tangent:120.18 Chord: 238.74 Course: S 16-16-48 W Course In: S 67-03-53 E Course Out: N 80-22-31 W RP North: 115774.3700 East: 1279508.2326 End North: 115946.5800 East: 1278492.7309 Line Course: S 09-37-29 W Length: 484.24 North: 115469.1562 East: 1278411.7688 Curve Length:770.34 Radius: 1170.00 Delta:37-43-27 Tangent:399.72 Chord: 756.50 Course: S 28-29-13 W Course In: N 80-22-31 W Course Out: S 42-39-04 E RP North: 115664.7733 East: 1277258.2377 End North: 114804.2466 East: 1278050.9506 Line Course: S 47-20-56 W Length: 141.77 North: 114708.1928 East: 1277946.6797 Line Course: N 42-39-04 W Length: 7.00 North: 114713.3412 East: 1277941.9370 Line Course: S 47-20-56 W Length: 141.29 North: 114617.6127 East: 1277838.0192 Curve Length:58.71 Radius: 1237.00 Delta:2-43-10 Tangent:29.36 Chord: 58.71 Course: S 45-59-21 W Course In: S 42-39-04 E Course Out: N 45-22-14 W RP North: 113707.8079 East: 1278676.1267 End North: 114576.8237 East: 1277795.7970 Line Course: N 45-22-14 W Length: 7.00 North: 114581.7414 East: 1277790.8153 Curve Length:43.31 Radius: 1244.00 Delta:1-59-41 Tangent:21.66 Chord: 43.31 Course: S 43-37-55 W Course In: S 45-22-14 E Course Out: N 47-21-55 W RP North: 113707.8079 East: 1278676.1267 End North: 114550.3964 East: 1277760.9324 Line Course: N 47-21-55 W Length: 28.00 North: 114569.3614 East: 1277740.3332 Curve Length:73.13 Radius: 1272.00 Delta:3-17-38 Tangent:36.57 Chord: 73.12 Course: S 40-59-16 W Course In: S 47-21-55 E Course Out: N 50-39-33 W RP North: 113707.8079 East: 1278676.1267 End North: 114514.1697 East: 1277692.3764 Line Course: S 59-43-45 E Length: 0.01 North: 114514.1646 East: 1277692.3850 Area: 2,096,099 Sq Ft 48.12 Acres LOT 2 North: 116860.2825 East: 1276990.7435 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 262.01 North: 116609.2702 East: 1276915.6299 Line Course: N 73-20-26 W Length: 25.00 North: 116616.4373 East: 1276891.6792 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 744.00 North: 115903.6662 East: 1276678.3875 Curve Length: 160.90 Radius: 11335.00 Delta:0-48-48 Tangent:80.45 Chord: 160.90 Course: S 16-15-10 W Course In: S 73-20-26 E Course Out: N 74-09-14 W RP North: 112654.1203 East: 1287537.6083 End North: 115749.1936 East: 1276633.3547 Line Course: S 88-23-02 E Length: 640.70 North: 115731.1241 East: 1277273.7998 Line Course: N 24-11-27 E Length: 408.88 North: 116104.0986 East: 1277441.3495 Curve Length:297.69 Radius: 1525.00 Delta: 11 -11-04 Tangent:149.32 Chord: 297.22 Course: N 29-46-59 E Course In: S 65-48-33 E Course Out: N 54-37-29 W RP North: 115479.1885 East: 1278832.4327 End North: 116362.0558 East: 1277588.9817 Curare Length:325.03 Radius:535.00 Delta:34-48-34 Tangent:167.71 Chord: 320.06 Course: N 52-46-48 E Course In: S 54-37-29 E Course Out: N 19-48-55 W RP North: 116052.3286 East: 1278025.2088 End North: 116555.6515 East: 1277843.8498 Curve Length:595.57 Radius:340.00 Delta: 100-21-48 Tangent: 407.82 Chord: 522.29 Course: S 59-38-01 E Course In: S 19-48-55 E Course Out: N 80-32-53 E RP North: 116235.7827 East: 1277959.1060 End North: 116291.6176 East: 1278294.4900 Line Course: S 09-27-07 E Length: 11.23 North: 116280.5401 East: 1278296.3342 Curve Length:81.34 Radius:60.00 Delta:77-40-28 Tangent:48.31 Chord: 75.25 Course: S 48-17-21 E Course In: N 80-32-53 E Course Out: S 02-52-25 W RP North: 116290.3933 East: 1278355.5196 End North: 116230.4688 East: 1278352.5116 Curve Length: 175.07 Radius:500.00 Delta:20-03-42 Tangent:88.44 Chord: 174.18 Course: S 77-05-44 E Course In: S 02-52-25 W Course Out: N 22-56-07 E RP North: 115731.0975 East: 1278327.4452 End North: 116191.5703 East: 1278522.2907 Line Course: S 67-03-53 E Length: 40.58 North: 116175.7566 East: 1278559.6627 Curare Length:490.55 Radius: 1030.00 Delta:27-17-17 Tangent:250.02 Chord: 485.93 Course: N 36-34-46 E Course In: S 67-03-53 E Course Out: N 39-46-36 W RP North: 115774.3748 East: 1279508.2367 End North: 116565.9753 East: 1278849.2460 Line Course: N 50-13-24 E Length: 275.46 North: 116742.2137 East: 1279060.9492 Curve Length:94.70 Radius:670.00 Delta:8-05-53 Tangent:47.43 Chord: 94.62 Course: N 46-10-28 E Course In: N 39-46-36 W Course Out: S 47-52-29 E RP North: 117257.1383 End North: 116807.7332 Line Course: N 89-05-51 W North: 116817.9406 Line Course: N 88-22-20 W North: 116860.2972 Line Course: S 10-56-03 E North: 116860.2873 East: 1278632.2854 East: 1279129.2109 Length: 648.05 East: 1278481.2413 Length: 1491.10 East: 1276990.7431 Length: 0.01 East : 1276990.7450 Area: 1,315,934 Sq Ft 30.21 Ac. LOT 3 - TO TPOB OF PORTION WEST OF ROW North: 116860.2825 East: 1276990.7435 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 262.01 North: 116609.2702 East: 1276915.6299 Line Course: N 73-20-26 W Length: 25.00 North: 116616.4373 East: 1276891.6792 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 744.00 North: 115903.6662 East: 1276678.3875 Curve Length: 160.90 Radius: 11335.00 Delta:0-48-48 Tangent:80.45 Chord: 160.90 Course: S 16-15-10 W Course In: S 73-20-26 E Course Out: N 74-09-14 W RP North: 112654.1203 East: 1287537.6083 End North: 115749.1936 East: 1276633.3547 Line Course: S 16-39-34 W Length: 0.00 North: 115749.1936 East: 1276633.3547 LOT 3 - PORTION WEST OF ROW North: 115749.1936 East: 1276633.3547 Curve Length: 369.95 Radius: 11335.00 Delta:1-52-12 Tangent:184.99 Chord: 369.93 Course: S 14-54-40 W Course In: S 74-09-14 E Course Out: N 76-01-26 W RP North: 112654.1203 East: 1287537.6083 End North: 115391.7191 East: 1276538.1639 Line Course: S 13-58-34 W Length: 983.01 North: 114437.8097 East: 1276300.7499 Line Course: S 88-19-11 E Length: 1348.40 North: 114398.2716 East : 1277648.5701 Curve Length:75.99 Radius: 1238.00 Delta:3-31-01 Tangent:38.01 Chord: 75.98 Course: N 35-39-26 E Course In: S 56-06-04 E Course Out: N 52-35-03 W RP North: 113707.8031 East: 1278676.1387 End North: 114460.0062 East: 1277692.8613 Line Course: N 52-35-03 W Length: 19.00 North: 114471.5505 East: 1277677.7706 Curve Length:42.23 Radius: 1257.00 Delta: 1-55-30 Tangent: 21.12 Chord: 42.23 Course: N 38-22-42 E Course In: S 52-35-03 E Course Out: N 50-39-33 W RP North: 113707.8031 East: 1278676.1387 End North: 114504.6559 East: 1277703.9892 Line Course: N 50-39-33 W Length: 15.00 North: 114514.1649 East: 1277692.3884 Line Course: N 50-39-33 W Length: 37.25 North: 114537.7789 East : 1277663.5797 Curve Length:39.60 Radius:480.00 Delta:4-43-38 Tangent:19.81 Chord: 39.59 Course: N 48-17-44 W Course In: N 39-20-27 E Course Out: S 44-04-05 W RP North: 114909.0054 East: 1277967.8671 End North: 114564.1186 East: 1277634.0212 Curve Length: 75.14 Radius:60.00 Delta:71-45-10 Tangent:43.40 Chord: 70.32 Course: N 81-48-30 W Course In: S 44-04-05 W Course Out: N 27-41-05 W RP North: 114521.0077 East: 1277592.2905 End North: 114574.1388 East: 1277564.4141 Curve Length:509.43 Radius:350.00 Delta:83-23-43 Tangent:311.81 Chord: 465.64 Course: N 75-59-14 W Course In: N 27-41-05 W Course Out: S 55-42-38 W RP North: 114884.0699 East: 1277401.8021 End North: 114686.8891 East: 1277112.6313 Curve Length:450.72 Radius:655.00 Delta:39-25-36 Tangent:234.70 Chord: 441.88 Course: N 14-34-34 W Course In: N 55-42-38 E Course Out: N 84-51-46 W RP North: 115055.8990 East: 1277653.7937 End North: 115114.5486 East: 1277001.4248 Curve Length:267.17 Radius:490.00 Delta:31-14-24 Tangent:136.99 Chord: 263.87 Course: N 20-45-26 E Course In: S 84-51-46 E Course Out: N 53-37-22 W RP North: 115070.6733 East: 1277489.4565 End North: 115361.2917 East: 1277094.9430 Curve Length: 109.54 Radius:515.00 Delta: 12-11 -11 Tangent:54.98 Chord: 109.33 Course: N 30-17-02 E Course In: N 53-37-22 W Course Out: S 65-48-33 E RP North: 115666.7376 East: 1276680.3012 End North: 115455.7024 East: 1277150.0768 Line Course: N 24-11-27 E Length: 301.93 North: 115731.1187 East: 1277273.8008 Line Course: N 88-23-02 W Length: 640.70 North: 115749.1881 East: 1276633.3557 Line Course: N 10-18-40 W Length: 0.01 North: 115749.1980 East: 1276633.3539 Perimeter: 5285.07 Area: 922,548 Sq Ft 21.18 Ac. LOT 3 - PORTION EAST OF ROW North: 115417.4030 East: 1278463.1118 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 323.27 North: 115094.1736 East: 1278457.9855 Line Course: N 89-05-29 W Length: 45.00 North: 115094.8872 East: 1278412.9912 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 97.00 North: 114997.8994 East: 1278411.4530 Line Course: N 89-05-29 W Length: 75.00 North: 114999.0888 East: 1278336.4624 Line Course: S 00-54-31 W Length: 140.00 North: 114859.1064 East: 1278334.2423 Line Course: S 84-38-11 E Length: 84.08 North: 114851.2469 East: 1278417.9542 Line Course: S 10-33-33 W Length: 34.75 North: 114817.0853 East: 1278411.5862 Line Course: S 14-50-51 W Length: 31.55 North: 114786.5888 East: 1278403.5016 Line Course: S 23-47-48 W Length: 68.08 North: 114724.2967 East: 1278376.0319 Line Course: S 26-00-29 W Length: 88.68 North: 114644.5971 East: 1278337.1459 Line Course: S 28-36-54 W Length: 68.59 North: 114584.3849 East: 1278304.2967 Line Course: S 22-20-40 W Length: 41.36 North: 114546.1304 East: 1278288.5727 Line Course: S 10-06-33 W Length: 79.320 North: 114468.0418 East: 1278274.6501 Line Course: S 19-56-27 E Length: 48.12 North: 114422.8068 East: 1278291.0614 Line Course: S 17-22-15 E Length: 45.88 North: 114379.0193 East: 1278304.7591 Line Course: N 88-19-11 W Length: 570.290 North: 114395.7414 East: 1277734.7144 Curve Length:227.76 Radius: 1166.000 Delta:11-11-30 Tangent:114.242 Chord: 227.395 Course: N 41-45-11 E Course In: S 53-50-34 E Course Out: N 42-39-04 W RP North: 113707.7979 East: 1278676.1440 End North: 114565.3827 East: 1277886.1413 Line Course: N 47-20-56 E Length: 141.29 North: 114661.1113 East: 1277990.0591 Line Course: N 42-39-04 W Length: 4.00 North: 114664.0533 East: 1277987.3489 Line Course: N 47-20-56 E Length: 141.70 North: 114760.1070 East: 1278091.6198 Curve Length: 767.41 Radius: 1230.000 Delta:35-44-50 Tangent:396.65 Chord: 755.019 Course: N 29-28-31 E Course In: N 42-39-04 W Course Out: S 78-23-54 E RP North: 115664.7634 East: 1277258.2550 End North: 115417.4025 East: 1278463.1254 Line Course: N 87-53-56 W Length: 0.01 North: 115417.4030 East: 1278463.1114 Perimeter: 3123.205 Area: 218,260 S.F. 5.011 ACRES NOTE: This acreage is not the parcel acreage because a straight line was used for closing the figure. The boundary of the lot is the shoreline of North Lake. Parcel to be reported as approximately 6 acres. Centerlines to North -1-5 to 320th to Weyerhaeuser Way to 336tn North: 113132.2661 East: 1275789.0401 Line Course: S 88-15-22 E Length: 57.80 North: 113130.5071 East: 1275846.8134 Line Course: N 13-58-34 E Length: 2361.00 North: 115421.6133 East: 1276417.0358 Curve Length: 536.71 Radius: 11460.00 Delta:2-41-00 Tangent:268.40 Chord: 536.66 Course: N 15-19-04 E Course In: S 76-01-26 E Course Out: N 73-20-26 W RP North: 112653.8248 East: 1287537.7798 End North: 115939.2060 East: 1276558.8057 Line Course: N 16-39-34 E Length: 2540.63 North: 118373.1947 East: 1277287.1598 Line Course: S 88-20-53 E Length: 1213.32 North: 118338.2172 East: 1278499.9756 Line Course: S 89-44-49 E Length: 845.88 North: 118334.4813 East: 1279345.8473 Line Course: S 00-42-32 W Length: 1086.39 North: 117248.1744 East: 1279332.4063 Curve Length:604.93 Radius:700.00 Delta:49-30-52 Tangent:322.81 Chord: 586.28 Course: S 25-27-58 W Course In: N 89-17-28 W Course Out: S 39-46-36 E RP North: 117256.8349 East: 1278632.4599 End North: 116718.8540 East: 1279080.3177 Line Course: S 50-13-24 W Length: 275.46 North: 116542.6156 East: 1278868.6145 Curve Length:708.58 Radius: 1000.00 Delta:40-35-55 Tangent:369.90 Chord: 693.85 Course: S 29-55-26 W Course In: S 39-46-36 E Course Out: N 80-22-31 W RP North: 115774.0715 East: 1279508.4113 End North: 115941.2657 East : 1278522.4873 Line Course: S 09-37-29 W Length: 484.24 North: 115463.8418 East: 1278441.5252 Curve Length:790.09 Radius: 1200.00 Delta:37-43-27 Tangent:409.96 Chord: 775.90 Course: S 28-29-12 W Course In: N 80-22-31 W Course Out: S 42-39-04 E RP North: 115664.4748 East: 1277258.4164 End North: 114781.8833 East: 1278071.4552 Line Course: S 47-20-56 W Length: 283.06 North: 114590.1009 East: 1277863.2665 Curve Length:534.06 Radius: 1200.00 Delta:25-29-58 Tangent:271.53 Chord: 529.66 Course: S 34-35-57 W Course In: S 42-39-04 E Course Out: N 68-09-02 W RP North: 113707.5094 East: 1278676.3054 End North: 114154.1121 East: 1277562.5074 Curve Length:611.75 Radius:450.00 Delta:77-53-26 Tangent:363.69 Chord: 565.72 Course: S 60-47-41 W Course In: N 68-09-02 W Course Out: S 09-44-24 W RP North: 114321.5881 East: 1277144.8331 End North: 113878.0746 East : 1277068.7032 Curare Length:759.63 Radius:596.24 Delta:72-59-47 Tangent:441.17 Chord: 709.28 Course: S 63-14-30 W Course In: S 09-44-24 W Course Out: N 63-15-23 W RP North: 113290.4291 East : 1276967.8328 End North: 113558.7364 East: 1276435.3732 Line Course: S 26-44-37 W Length: 268.95 North: 113318.5562 East: 1276314.3460 Curve Length:397.43 Radius:350.00 Delta:65-03-36 Tangent:223.23 Chord: 376.42 Course: S 59-12-43 W Course In: N 63-19-05 W Course Out: S 01-44-31 W RP North: 113475.7193 East: 1276001.6164 End North: 113125.8810 East: 1275990.9771 Line Course: N 88-11-07 W Length: 202.04 North: 113132.2792 East: 1275789.0385 Line Course: S 07-15-47 E Length: 0.01 North: 113132.2692 East: 1275789.0397 Centerlines to South - 1-5 to section lines North: 107934.0960 East: 1273040.3770 Line Course: N 01-34-24 E Length: 2649.44 North: 110582.5372 East: 1273113.1211 Line Course: N 01-12-17 E Length: 2630.15 North: 113212.1058 East: 1273168.4195 Line Course: S 88-15-41 E North: 113132.5657 Line Course: S 88-15-22 E North: 113130.8067 Line Course: S 13-58-34 W North: 107895.3332 Line Course: N 88-31-23 W North: 107934.0911 Line Course: N 34-46-54 E North: 107934.0993 Length: 2621.64 East: 1275788.8526 Length: 57.80 East: 1275846.6258 Length: 5395.19 East: 1274543.5940 Length: 1503.72 East: 1273040.3736 Length: 0.01 East: 1273040.3793 Centerlines to South - 336th to Weyerhaeuser Way to 32"d to section lines North: 113132.2661 East: 1275789.0401 Line Course: S 88-11-07 E Length: 202.04 North: 113125.8680 East: 1275990.9788 Curve Length:397.43 Radius:350.00 Delta:65-03-36 Tangent:223.23 Chord: 376.42 Course: N 59-12-43 E Course In: N 01-44-31 E Course Out: S 63-19-05 E RP North: 113475.7062 East: 1276001.6181 End North: 113318.5431 East: 1276314.3476 Line Course: N 26-44-37 E Length: 268.95 North: 113558.7233 East: 1276435.3748 Curve Length:759.63 Radius:596.24 Delta:72-59-47 Tangent:441.17 Chord: 709.28 Course: N 63-14-30 E Course In: S 63-15-23 E Course Out: N 09-44-24 E RP North: 113290.4160 East: 1276967.8345 End North: 113878.0615 East: 1277068.7049 Curve Length: 52.07 Radius:596.24 Delta:5-00-13 Tangent:26.05 Chord: 52.05 Course: S 77-45-30 E Course In: S 09-44-24 W Course Out: N 14-44-37 E RP North: 113290.4160 East: 1276967.8345 End North: 113867.0244 East: 1277119.5741 Curve Length:623.08 Radius:510.00 Delta:70-00-00 Tangent:357.11 Chord: 585.05 Course: S 40-15-23 E Course In: S 14-44-37 W Course Out: N 84-44-37 E RP North: 113373.8165 East: 1276989.7821 End North: 113420.5389 East: 1277497.6374 Line Course: S 05-15-23 E Length: 342.69 North: 113079.2900 East: 1277529.0321 Line Course: S 05-15-23 E Length: 68.55 North: 113011.0283 East: 1277535.3122 Curve Length:722.79 Radius:600.00 Delta:69-01-16 Tangent:412.53 Chord: 679.87 Course: S 39-46-01 E Course In: N 84-44-37 E Course Out: S 15-43-21 W RP North: 113065.9959 East: 1278132.7890 End North: 112488.4447 East: 1277970.2019 Line Course: S 74-16-39 E Length: 186.80 North: 112437.8259 East: 1278150.0129 Curve Length:461.28 Radius:350.00 Delta:75-30-48 Tangent:271.06 Chord: 428.62 Course: S 36-31-15 E Course In: S 15-43-21 W Course Out: S 88-45-51 E RP North: 112100.9210 East: 1278055.1704 End North: 112093.3723 East: 1278405.0890 Line Course: S 01-14-09 W Length: 1660.97 North: 110432.7887 East: 1278369.2657 Line Course: N 88-22-17 W Length: 5258.09 North: 110582.2278 East: 1273113.2997 Line Course: N 01-12-17 E Length: 2630.15 North: 113211.7964 East: 1273168.5982 Line Course: S 88-15-41 E Length: 2621.64 North: 113132.2563 East: 1275789.0313 Line Course: N 42-04-29 E Length: 0.01 North: 113132.2637 East: 1275789.0380 \\esm8\engr\esm jobs\1886\001\016-0010\document\closures on bla2.doc CITY OF 1., Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor February 10, 2017 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 811, Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 eric.labrie@esmcivil.com Re: File No. 17-100455-00-SU; BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION Greenline Technology Center BLA, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: On January 31, 2017, the city received your firm's Boundary Line Adjustment (`BLA") application materials submitted on behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC ("FWC"). This BLA application materially conflicts with your previously submitted Binding Site Plan (`BSP") application, which encompasses the same parcels. The city is unable to process the applications concurrently in light of this incompatibility. Please choose which application you wish to move forward with and withdraw the other application. In the alternative, you may revise your BSP application to reflect the requested lines indicated in the BLA application. This requested information is necessary in order for the city to accurately understand your intent and to efficiently and effectively process the subject application(s). If you do not provide written direction and clarification to this effect, the city will process and issue its decisions on these applications in the order they were received—i.e., acting first on the BSP, and then processing and reviewing the BLA after the BSP decision is made. As way of background, the BLA application seeks to reconfigure the boundary lines of three parcels (162104- 9013, 162104-9030, and 162104-9056), which are comprised of 104.55 acres of property in the city's CP-1 zone. These parcels are also part of the BSP application (city file 16-104996-SU) received on October 13, 2016, with a resubmittal received on November 14, 2016. As indicated in the city's November 10 and 28, 2016 letters, the BSP application is an `incomplete application." To date, you have not submitted the information requested by the city that is necessary to complete the BSP application. Additionally, you submitted a Short Subdivision application (city file 16-105003-SU) for these same three parcels on October 13, 2016, which was rejected by the city in a October 21, 2016, letter. This means that since October 2016, you have submitted three separate applications to the city to adjust the property lines on the three above - referenced parcels. While the Short Subdivision application was rejected, you are still requesting that the city process two separate applications to adjust the boundary lines on the same property. Processing the BLA and BSP concurrently as you propose in your January 30, 2017, application cover letter is unfeasible because the proposed lot layouts and project outcomes for these respective applications are irreconcilably and fundamentally inconsistent, i.e., the applications set out different lot line configurations for the same parcels. While your January 30 letter asserts that the goal of the BLA is merely to realign internal parcels with respect to an existing improvement, the current configuration of the BSP will necessarily negate the substance of what the BLA proposes to accomplish. Please note that a BSP can accomplish the desired boundary line revisions in addition to creating new lots. Na. Eric LaBrie Page 2 of 2 February 10, 2017 If you still prefer for the city to process the BSP and BLA applications as individual actions, then those applications will be processed in succession based upon the date received. As explained above, the city cannot process the BLA and BSP applications concurxently, as the BSP will necessarily alter what the BLA intends to accomplish. To be clear, the city will continue processing the pending BSP application (after we receive the additional requested information to complete that application) while we wait to hear back from you. Please provide a response by February 24, 2017. On a related matter, you are correct that a preapplication conference is not required for a BLA per Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.40.030(1). As stewards of the permitting process, we wish to continue working with you to find solutions to the issues raised above. If there is any additional information we can provide to clarify the city's position or to enhance our communications, please let me know. Feel free to contact me with any questions at (253) 835-2612, or brian.davis@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, 5 'Z—A�� Brian Davis Community Development Director c: Mark Orthmann, Acting City Attorney Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner Tom Messmer, c/o Federal Way Campus LLC, tmessmer@industrialrealtygroup.com John C. McCullough, McCullough Hill Leary, PS, jack@mhseatde.com File #17-100455-000-00-SU Doc. I.D. 75340 AACITY OF �, Federal Way Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8s' Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com FILE Re: File #17-100455-SU; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Greenline Technology Center BLA, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South Dear Mr. LaBrie: Jim Ferrell, Mayor February 28, 2017 The City of Federal Way's Community Development Department is in receipt of your3anuary 31, 2017, Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application submittal proposing to adjust boundary lines between parcels 162104-9013, 162104-9030, and 162104-9056. Pursuant to Federal Wray Rezired Code (FWRC) 18.10.040, within 28 days of receiving a BLA application, the city shall determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence as a Notice of Complete Application. The application is deemed complete as of February 28, 2017, based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set out in FWRC 18.10.030 and Bulletin #038, Boundary LineA4wslnent Submittal Requirement'. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to the City of Federal Way codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. Formal processing and review of your application will now begin. Technical review comments will follow at a later date. A 120-day time line for reviewing the BLA application has started as of this date. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line can be stopped any time the city requests corrections and/or additional information. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your application, please feel free to contact me at 253-835- 2634, or stacgy,%velsh26tyoffederalwav-caa . Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner c: Tom Messmer, Federal Way Campus LLC, 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90025 Doc. I.D. 75464 File #17-100455-00-SU CITY OF � Federal Way Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC FILE 33400 811, Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #17-100455-SU; TECHNICAL COMMENTS Greenline Technology Center BLA, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: March 22, 2017 The City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development is in receipt of the above -referenced Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) application. The proposal is to adjust the boundary lines between parcels 162104-90.13, 162104-9030, and 162104-9056. Staff has completed technical review of your application. The following items must be addressed prior to the city approving the BLA application. Stacey Welsh, Planning Division, 253-835-2634, stac .welsh .ci ❑ffederalwa .cam 1. City Bulletin #038 "Boundary Line Adjustment," states the BLA drawing shall include the following: a. Item M — Scaled vicinity map with labeled streets and north arrow. Comment: The vicinity map is not drawn to scale. 2. On Sheet 1, remove the King County Health Department signature block. 3. Remove the 100-foot development setback line near Interstate 5 and its associated note throughout the BLA. 4. What is the 100-foot buffer near North Lake on Lot 3 measured off of? The line is not labelled. 5. The submitted critical areas report primarily references the 1994 wetland code and does not provide ratings for the wetlands on the property. The report must be revised per prior direction regarding the Campus property with regard to critical areas. Please revise the report in accordance with current code, Federal Way Rewired Code (FWIRC) Chapters 19,145 (°`Environmentally Critical Areas' ] and 15.10 ("Critical Areas') for areas within the shoreline jurisdiction. The critical areas report submitted with the Binding Site Plan (BSP) application (file 16-104996-SU) utilizes FWRC Chapter 19.145. After resubmittal, the revised report will be routed to the city's consultant for a peer review, and any technical comments pertaining thereto will follow at a later date. Ann Dower, PW Development Services, 253-835-2732, a=.dower@—Cit offederal a .com 6. Add the city's project number (17-100455-SU) to the upper left corner. 7. Provide vertical datum information (KCAS or NGVD-29). 8. The surveyor must sign and stamp the lot closure calculations; provide two sets of stamped closures. 9. Identify all controlling corners used. Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 2 of 2 March 22, 2017 10. To avoid a nonconforming driveway separation, an access and utility easement shall be recorded in favor of Lot 3 to allow use of the existing private loop road. A similar easement should also be provided for Lot 2. Erik Preston, PW Traffic, 253-835-2744, etik.preston@cirvoffederalway.com 11. Comments will follow at a later date. Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, 253-946-5407, Asbu akehaven.or 12. Establishment of the proposed BLA will cause the proposed new Lot 2 to not have any direct access to sewer system facilities and sewer service. The nearest existing sewer system facilities to the new Lot 2 are north of the lot on adjacent parcel 2154650080. An additional Lakehaven easement will need to be secured from the adjacent property owner to utilize this route. The existing private pump station on the new Lot 1 will only be allowed to serve Lot 1 once this BLA is established, pursuant to WAC 173-240-104. 13. Future development of new Lots 2 and/or 3, or redevelopment of new Lot 1, may require a Lakehaven Developer Extension (DE) Agreement to construct new and/or relocate and/or abandon existing water distribution and/or sanitary sewer system facilities. Additional detail and/or design requirements can be obtained from Lakehaven by completing and submitting a separate application to Lakehaven for either a Developer Pre -Design Meeting or a DE Agreement. Lakehaven encourages owners, developers, and/or applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre- design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. CLOSING Once the revisions listed above are made, provide four paper copies of the BLA document with the enclosed Resubmittal Form, along with a letter explaining how the technical comments have been addressed. Pursuant to FWRC 18.05.080, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. Please contact me at .welsh�oeera_1_wal .com, or 253-835-2634, if you have questions regarding this letter or your application. Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AIICP Senior Planner enc: Resubmittal Form c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Tom Messmer, Federal Way Campus LLC, 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90025 File 17-100455-SU Doc. I. D. 75568 CITY OF CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 _ (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Mr. Eric LaBrie March 31, 2017 ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 81h Avenue South, Suite 205 FILE Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: File #17-100455-SU; TECHNICAL COMMENTS -TRAFFIC Greenline Technology Center BLA, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: The City of Federal Way sent a letter on March 22, 2017, with technical comments in which it was stated that traffic comments would follow at a later date. Those comments are now provided below and must be addressed prior to the city approving the BLA application. Erik Preston, PW Traffic, 253-835-2744, rik. reston ci ffederalmva . om 1. The westerly portion of Lot 3 cannot access Weyerhaeuser Way and meet the 150-foot driveway spacing standard; therefore, an easement across the proposed Lot 1 is required. An access easement for Lot 2 is not necessarily required since sufficient frontage on Weyerhaeuser Way South exists to construct a driveway and meet spacing requirements. CLOSING Once the revisions listed above, and those detailed in the March 22, 2017, technical comment letter are made, provide four paper copies of the BLA document with a Resubmittal Form (enclosed), along with a letter explaining how the technical comments have been addressed. Pursuant to FWRC 18.05.080, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. Please contact me at staCey.welshO,cityaffederaltvay.coM, or 253-835-2634, if you have questions regarding this letter or your application. Sincerely, 2✓e� Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner Enclosure c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Tom Messmer, Federal Way Campus LLC, 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90025 File 17-100455-00-SU Doc. I.D. 75624 CITY OF Federal Way WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: April 10, 2017 City: City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Consultant: Iron Logan ESA 5309 Shilshole Ave NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 Project: Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment Wetland Delineation 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S Parcels: 162104-9013, 162104-9030, and 162104-9056 File No.: 17-100455-00-SU Project Proponent: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8th Ave South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 253-838-6113 eric.labrieOesmeivil.com Project Planner: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh statey.welsli , c':tvaffederalway.com, 253-835-2634 Project Background: The applicant is interested in adjusting, the boundary lines of 3 parcels to locate the existing Tech Center and parking on its own lot. As part of this process they are required to identify and map critical areas. The approximately 104.55-acre site contains wetlands. A critical areas report has been submitted for review. Documents Provided: • Existing Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels G, H & 1), by Talasaea (report date: March 29, 2017) V" ■ BLA Drawings (for reference)+ • City Map Sheets 64 & 67 t,� 17-100955-00.SO Doc. I.D. 75632 • **Docurents have been loaded to the City's ftp site: ft :IICt .citvoffederaltua .comloutbox then go to the Greenline Submittal Documents link, then to the Tech Center BLA link. Task Scope: 1. Review the wetland delineations for consistency with the requirements of Federal Woy Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.145, "Environmentally Critical Areas," especially: a. Article 1V Chapter 19.145 "Wetlands" 2. Conduct site visit(s) as necessary. 3. Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request additional information from applicant if needed. 4. Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. 5. Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. 6. Project management as necessary if additional land use review is required Task Cost: Not to exceed $ !2,`�Ofl without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Acceptance: CDIi 11 n Date City o�-Federal taff Date Applicant Date Doe I D 7502 17-100455.00-SU A�kCITY OF , Federal Way April 24, 2017 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #17-100455-00-SU; WETLAND CONSULTANT REVIEW ESTIMATE Greenline Tech Center BLA— Wetland Delineation Review, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South Dear Mr. LaBrie: Enclosed please find the consultant task authorization with scope of work for review of the critical areas report. The department's wetland consultant, ESA, was asked to provide an estimate for their review of information prepared by Talasaea. The normal course of action is for the city to set up an account to be funded by the applicant and drawn down by the work performed by ESA. Please note that if any of the funds are not used, they will be returned to the applicant. A cheek in the amount of $12,400.00, payable to the City of Federal Way, and signature on the consultant authorization form must be submitted before the review will begin. Please note —this fee covers a specific scope of work. Additional reviews or meetings beyond that identified in the scope of work will require a supplemental cost and authorization. Following receipt, I will authorize ESA to begin their formal review. ESA requests that the digital files of the Talasaea wetland boundaries be provided to them prior to commencement of their field investigations and that a field meeting with an ESA biologist and a Talasaea biologist occur on the first day of wedand verification field work. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2634, or stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner enc: Wedand Consultant Authorization Form City of Federal Way Invoice Doc. 1,D. 75759 Fk #17-100455-00-SU Stacey Welsh From: Tina Piety Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 1:55 PM To: Eric Labrie Cc: Stacey Welsh; Jim Harris Subject: Greenline Tech Center BLA Attachments: Greenline Tech Center Invoice.pdf; Greenline Tech Center Wetland Consultant Review Form.pdf; Greenline Tech Center Wetland Consultant Review Letter.pdf Hello, Attached you will find a letter, invoice, and authorization form for the Wetland Consultant Review for the Greenline Tech Center BLA. A hard copy has been mailed. Please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at Stacey.weish cityoffedealway.com, or 253-835-2634 with any questions and or comments. Have a good day, E. Tina Piety, CAP -OM Administrative Assistant II Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8ch Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.co CITY OF �..R Federal Way April 24, 2017 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers I,LC 33400 81h Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re: File #17-100455-00-SU; WETLAND CONSULTANT REVIEW ESTIMATE Greenline Tech Center BLA— Wetland Delineation Review, 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South Dear Mr. LaBrie: Enclosed please find the consultant task authorization with scope of work for review of the critical areas report. The department's wetland consultant, ESA, was asked to provide an estimate for their review of information prepared by Talasaea. The normal course of action is for the city to set up an account to be funded by the applicant and drawn down by the work performed by ESA. Please note that if any of the funds are not used, they will be returned to the applicant, A check in the amount of $12,400.00, payable to the City of Federal Way, and signature on the consultant authorization form must be submitted before the review will begin. Please note this fee covers a specific scope of work. Additional reviews or meetings beyond that identified in the scope of work will require a supplemental cost and authorization. Following receipt, I will authorize ESA to begin their formal review. ESA requests that d1e digital files of the Talasaea wetland boundaries be provided to them prior to commencement of their field investigations and that a field meeting with an ESA biologist and a Talasaea biologist occur on the first day of wetland verification field work. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your project, please contact me at 253-835-2634, or stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner enc: Wetland Consultant Authorization Form City of Federal Way Invoice We a17-100455-00su Doe. I.D. 75759 INVOICE City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue S. INVOICE TO: ERICLABRIE BILL NO: 216961 ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC BILL DATE: April 21, 2017 33400 8TH AVE S SUITE 205 PERMIT NO: 17 100455 00 SU FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PROJECT LOCATION: 32901 WEYERHAEUSER WAY S FOLDER NAME: GREENLINE TECHNOLOGY CENTER BLA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Adjustment of boundary lines of (3) parcels to locate existing tech center and parking on its own lot. FEE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT CD - DEP ENV PASS-THRU (8045) $12,400.00 TOTAL: $12,400.00 PAYMENT RECEIVED: $0.00 BALANCE: $12,400.00 CITY 6F Federal Way WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: April 10, 2017 City: City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Consultant: lion Logan ESA 5309 Shilshole Ave NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 Project: Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment Wetland Delineation 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S Parcels: 162104-9013, 162104-9030, and 162104-9056 File No.: 17-100455-00-SU Project Proponent: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8th Ave South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 253-838-6113 c6c.1abric@&esrn6vil.corn Project Planner: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh stacev.welsh(r�t. cityofFederaiwaW.corn, 253-835-2634 Project Background: The applicant is interested in adjusting the boundary lines of 3 parcels to locate the existing Tech Center and parking on its own lot. As part of this process they are required to identify and map critical areas. Tire approximately 104.55-acre site contains wetlands. A critical areas report has been submitted for review. Documents Provided: • Existing Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels G, H & 1), by Talasaea (report date: March 29, 2017) r/ • BLA Drawings (for reference)+% • City Map Sheets 64 & 67 V/ 17-100455-00-SU Doc I D 756-,2 - "Documents have been loaded to the City's ftp site: fin://flp.city^oFtederaIway.com/outbox then go to the Greenline Submittal Documents link, then to the Tech Center BLA link. Task Scope: 1. Review the wetland delineations for consistency with the requirements of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.145, "Environmentally Critical Areas," especially: a. Article 1V Chapter 19.145 "Wetlands" 2. Conduct site visit(s) as necessary. 3. Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request additional information from applicant if needed. 4. Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. 5. Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. 6. Project management as necessary if additional land use review is required Task Cost: Not to exceed $ ��,�DO without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Acceptance: City of Federal Way Staff Applicant -4 n Date Date Date 17-IOD455-00-SU Doe I D. 75632 Stacey Welsh From: Ilon Logan <ILogan@esassoc.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 11:15 AM To: Stacey Welsh; Jim Harris Cc: Jessica Redman Subject: Third Party Review - cost estimates for 3 new TAs Attachments: Task Form-Greenline Warehouse A_ESA signed.pdf; Task form-Greenline Tech Center BLA-ESA signed.pdf; Task Form-Greenline Headquarters BLA-ESA signed.pdf Stacey and Jim, Thank you for the opportunity to provide cost estimates for third party review services of proposals on the Greenline campus. ESA has reviewed the three requests and this email contains an a brief explanation of our cost estimates. I have also attached the signed TAs. Greenline Warehouse "A" (fka Preferred Freezer) - Cost estimate: $7,500 - Based on our initial review of the revised materials, the critical areas report and conceptual mitigation plan have been substantially revised. Due to the amount of changes, we expect a level of effort a bit lower than the first review to compare the proposal against the 1994 Concomitant Agreement regulations, but we also note that the mitigation proposal now involves off -site mitigation, which requires a site visit, review of the proposed mitigation concept, and drawings for adequacy and consistency with the regulations. Greenline Tech Center BLA (104-acre site) - Cost estimate: $12,400 - The majority of costs are for field time to verify wetland boundaries and to review and verify the wetland classifications (rating forms) of the 64 wetlands. We request that the digital files of the Talasea wetland boundaries be provided to ESA prior to commencement of ESA's field investigations and that a field meeting with an ESA biologist and a Talasaea biologist occur on the first day of wetland verification field work. Greenline Headquarters BLA (239-acre site) - Cost estimate: $16,400 - As with the Tech Center, the majority of costs are for field time to verify wetland boundaries and to review and verify the wetland classifications (rating forms) of the 64 wetlands and streams on the property. We have also included a meeting with the City prior to field work. We request that the digital files of the Talasaea wetland boundaries be provided to ESA prior to commencement of ESA's field investigations and that a field meeting with an ESA biologist and a Talasaea biologist occur on the first day of wetland verification field work. Please feel free to give me or Jessica a call with any questions. Also, I am happy to provide a more detailed breakdown of the costs and level of effort we assumed for each of the activities if requested. ESA will bill on a time and materials basis and so if the field work and review take less time that we have initially estimated, the final costs will be lower than the amounts above. Thank you, Ilon Ilon E. Logan Senior Ecologist ESA I Environmental Science Associates 5309 Shilshole Ave. NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 206.789.9658 main 1206.789.9684 fax ilogan@_esassoc.com I www.esassoc.com CITY OF Federal Way WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: April 10, 2017 City: City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Consultant: Ilon Logan ESA 5309 Shilshole Ave NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 Project: Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment Wetland Delineation 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S Parcels: 162104-9013, 162104-9030, and 162104-9056 File No.: 17-100455-00-SU Project Proponent: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8th Ave South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 253-838-6113 eric.labric [nr estncivil.com Project Planner: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh stare .welsh r cit yoffederalwa .com, 253-835-2634 Project Background: The applicant is interested in adjusting the boundary lines of 3 parcels to locate the existing Tech Center and parking on its own lot. As part of this process they are required to identify and map critical areas. The approximately 104.55-acre site contains wetlands. A critical areas report has been submitted for review. Documents Provided: • Existing Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels G, H & I), by Talasaea (report date: March 29, 2017) cI • BLA Drawings (for reference) v,"' • City Map Sheets 64 & 67 17-100455-00-SU Doc I D. 756-32 + "Documents have been loaded to the City's ftp site: Ft :/!ft .eitvoffederalwav-comloiitbox then go to the Greenline Submittal Documents link, then to the Tech Center BLA link. Task Scope: 1. Review the wetland delineations for consistency with the requirements of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.145, "Environmentally Critical Areas," especially: a. Article IV Chapter 19.145 "Wetlands" 2. Conduct site visit(s) as necessary. 3. Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request additional information from applicant if needed. 4. Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. 5. Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. 6. Project management as necessary if additional land use review is required Task Cost: Not to exceed $ without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Acceptance: City of Federal Way Staff Applicant 17-100455-00-SU Date Date Date Doc I D 75632 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RESUBMITTAL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: 4-10-17 TO: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District FROM: Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner ! FOR DRC MTG. ON: No DRC, please provide any comments/conditions by 4124 FILE NUMBER(s): 17-100455-00-SU RELATED FILE NOS.: 16-104996-SU (Binding Site Plan -on hold) PROJECT NAME: Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment PROJECT ADDRESS: 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S ZONING DISTRICT: Corporate Park (CP-1) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Adjustment of boundary lines of 3 parcels to locate existing Tech Center and parking on its own lot. LAND USE PERMITS: Boundary Line Adjustment PROJECT CONTACT: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8tn Ave South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 MATERIALS RESUBMITTED: Resubmittal Information Form Response Letter Lot Closures Revised Existing Conditions Report dated 3-29-17 Revised BLA (10 sheets) CITY OF L Federal Way April 10, 2017 Ms. lion Logan ESA 5309 Shilshole Ave NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 Re: File #17-100455-00-SU; REQUEST FOR THIRD PARTY REVIEW Greenline Technology Center BLA Weltand Delineation Parcels 162104-9013, 162104-9030 & 162104-9056 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Logan: FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Enclosed please find the task authorization form for third party review of the Greenline Technology Center BLA Wetland Delineation. City staff is requesting review pursuant to the agreed terms of the on - call contract. Please review the scope of work on the task authorization form, enter the task cost on page two of the document, sign; and return it to the city. Following the deposit of funds by the applicant, staff will provide you with an authorization to proceed with the scope of work. Please contact me at 253-835-2634, or stacev.�a,elsl3;ci citvo ffederalway.ccz«i, if you have any questions regarding this task. Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner enc: Task Authorization Form 17-10045i -00-SU Doc I D TGII �l CITY OF A Federal Way WETLAND CONSULTANT AUTHORIZATION FORM Date: April 10, 2017 City: City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Consultant: Ilon Logan ESA 5309 Shilshole Ave NW, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98107 Project: Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment Wetland Delineation 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S Parcels: 162104-9013, 162104-9030, and 162104-9056 File No.: 17-100455-00-SU Project Proponent: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8th Ave South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 253-838-6113 eric.labrie viesmcivil.com Project Planner: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh stace y.welshQcitvoffederalway.com, 253-835-2634 Project Background: The applicant is interested in adjusting the boundary lines of 3 parcels to locate the existing Tech Center and parking on its own lot. As part of this process they are required to identify and map critical areas. The approximately 104.55-acre site contains wetlands. A critical areas report has been submitted for review. Documents Provided: ■ Existing Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels G, H & 1), by Talasaea (report date: March 29, 2017) ■ BLA Drawings (for reference) ■ City Map Sheets 64 & 67 17-IOOa55-00-SU Doc, I D 7i032 • **Documents have been loaded to the City's ftp site: ftp://ftp.citvotTederalway.com/outbox then go to the Greenline Submittal Documents link, then to the Tech Center BLA link. Task Scope: 1. Review the wetland delineations for consistency with the requirements of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.145, "Environmentally Critical Areas," especially: a. Article IV Chapter 19.145 "Wetlands" 2. Conduct site visit(s) as necessary. 3. Provide written response to findings, recommendations, and request additional information from applicant if needed. 4. Possible meeting with applicant's wetland biologist. 5. Review of resubmitted/corrected documents as needed. 6. Project management as necessary if additional land use review is required Task Cost: Not to exceed $ without a prior written amendment to this Task Authorization. Acceptance: Consultant City of Federal Way Staff Applicant Date Date Date 17-100455-00SU Doe I D 75632 April 6, 2017 Ms. Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way WA 98003 IC0NSULTIN RESUBMITTED ►DPP 0 6 2017 Cri Y OF FEDERA!. WAY COMMUNriY DEVELOPMENT I011q 0I1 q, Job No. 1886-001-016-0012 Re: File # 17-100455-SU; Technical Comments Greenline Technology Center BLA Response to Technical Comments Dear Stacey: ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, on behalf of Federal War Campus, LLC, is herein responding to two technical comment letters dated March 22n , 2017 and March 31, 2017. The following are ESM's responses to those technical comments. Stacey Welsh. Planning Division. 253-835-2634. staceywelsh@citvoffederalway.com 1. City Bulletin #038 'Boundary Line Adjustment," states the BLA drawing shall include the following., a. Item M - Scaled vicinity map with labeled streets and north arrow. b. Comment The vicinity map is not drawn to scale. ESM has provided a scaled vicinity map with labeled streets and north arrow on the revised BLA drawings. 2. On Sheet 1, remove the King County Health Department signature block ESM has removed the King County Health Department signature block from Sheet 1. 3. Remove the 100-foot development setback line near Interstate 5 and its associated note throughout the BLA. ESM has removed the 100-foot development setback line near Interstate 5 and its associated note throughout the BLA. ESM Federal Way ESM Everett Civil Engineering Land Planning 33400 8[h Ave S, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Land Surveying Landscape Architecture rederal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 425.297.9900tel 3D Laser Scanning GIS 253.838.6113tel 800,345.5694 tall free 800.345.5694toll free www.esmcivil.com 253.939.7104fax 425.297.9901 fax Ms. Stacey Welsh, AICP April 6, 2017 Page 2 4. What is the 100-foot buffer near North Lake on Lot 3 measured off ol? The line is not labeled. ESM has revised the BLA drawings to note that the 100-foot buffer on Lot 3 is measured off of an existing wetland. 5. The submitted critical areas report primarily references the 1994 wetland code and does not provide ratings for the wetlands on the property. The report must be revised per prior direction regarding the Campus property with regard to critical areas Please revise the report in accordance with current code, Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapters 19.145 ("Environmentally Critical Areas) and 15.10 rCritical Areas) for areas within the shoreline jurisdiction. The critical areas report submitted with the Binding Site Plan (BSP) application (file 16-104996-SU) utilizes FWRC Chapter 19,145. After resubmittal, the revised report will be routed to the city's consultant for a peer review, and any technical comments pertaining thereto will follow at a later date. Talasaea has revised their Existing Conditions Report to reflect these comments. Four copies of the existing conditions report have been included with this resubmittal. Ann Dower PW Development Services 253-835-2732 ann.dower@citvoffederalway.com 6. Add the city's project number (17-1OO455�SU) to the upper left comer. ESM has revised the BLA drawings to reflect the city's project number. 7. Provide vertical datum information (KCAS orNGVD--29) ESM has provided this information on the revised BLA topographic sheets. 8. The surveyor must sign and stamp the lot closure calculations; provide two sets of stamped closures ESM has included two copies of stamped lot closures with this resubmittal. 9. Identify all controlling comers used. ESM has provided this information on sheet 4. 10. To avoid a nonconforming driveway separation, an access and utility easement shall be recorded in favor of Lot 3 to allow use of the existing private loop road. A similar easement should also be provided for Lot 2. ESM has revised the BLA drawings to provide easement for Lot 3. Traffic Response, comment 11, does not require an easement for Lot 2. Ms. Stacey Welsh, AICP April 6, 2017 Page 3 Erik Preston PW Traffic 253-835-2744 erikpreston@cilyoffederalway.com 11. The westerly portion of Lot 3 cannot access Weyerhaeuser Way and meet the 150- foot driveway spacing standard,- therefore, an easement across the proposed Lot 1 is required. An access easement for Lot 2 is not necessarily required since sufficient frontage on Weyerhaeuser Way South exists to construct a driveway and meet spacing requirements The revised BLA drawings provide an easement for Lot 3. The easement document is forthcoming. Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District 253-946-5407 BAsbury@lakehaven.or 12. Establishment of the proposed BLA will cause the proposed new Lot 2 to not have any direct access to sewer system facilities and sewer service. The nearest existing sewer system facilities to the new Lot 2 are north of the lot on adjacent parcel 2154650080. An additional Lakehaven easement will need to be secured from the adjacent property owner to utilize this route. The existing private pump station on the new Lot 1 will only be allowed to serve Lot 1 once this BLA is established, pursuant to WAC 173-240-104. ESM has notified the property owner of this comment easement language is forthcoming. 13. Future development of new Lots 2 and/or 3, or redevelopment of new Lot 1, may require a Lakehaven Developer Extenslon (DE) Agreement to construct new and/or relocate and/or abandon existing water distribution and/ or sanitary sewer system facilities Additional detail and/ or design requirements can be obtained from Lakehaven by completing and submitting a separate application to Lakehaven for either a Developer Pre -Design Meeting or a DE Agreement. Lakehaven encourages owners, developers, and/or applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre -design/ planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development Acknowledged. Enclosed with this letter, please find the following materials, which constitute as our complete resubmittal: 1. This Response Letter; 2. Lot Closures stamped and signed (2 copies); 3. Revised BLA Drawings (6 copies); 4. Existing Conditions Report (4 copies) and; 5. CD containing abovementioned items (1 copy) Ms. Stacey Welsh, AICP April 6, 2017 Page 4 Please contact us immediately if you need any additional information or if you have any comments regarding our application. Thank you in advance for your attention to this project and we look forward to working with you through the process. Very truly yours, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC. ERIC LABRIE President Enclosures 1lesm8lengr esm-jobs1188610011016-00121documentlletter-005.docx CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: 2-28-17 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Stacey Welsh, Planning. FOR DRC MTG. ON: 3-16-17 - Technical comments FILE NUMBER(s): 17-100455-00-SU RELATED FILE NOS.: 16-104996-SU (Binding Site Plan) PROJECT NAME: Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment PROJECT ADDRESS: 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S ZONING DISTRICT: Corporate Park (CP-1) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Adjustment of boundary lines of 3 parcels to locate existing Tech Center and parking on its own lot. LAND USE PERMITS: Boundary Line Adjustment PROJECT CONTACT: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers 33400 8th Ave South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master Land Use Application Cover Letter Lot Closures Title Report Existing Conditions Report (wetlands) Before & After Exhibit BLA (10 sheets) --- -- CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC February 14, 2017 Mr. Brian Davis City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way WA 98003-9718 RE: File No 17-100455-00-SU Dear Brian: Job No. 1886-001-016-0012 Thank you for your letter of February 10, 2017 regarding the above -referenced boundary line adjustment (BLA) application. In the letter, you note that the BLA application is not consistent with the pending binding site plan (BSP) application (File No. 16-10496-SU) for the subject property. You have requested that the applicant withdraw the BSP application. We agree that the property boundaries reflected in the BSP application will be inaccurate upon approval of the BLA. This inconsistency will occur upon approval of the BLA, and at that time the applicant will need to revise or withdraw the BSP application. In the meantime, we would request that the City place the BSP application on hold, pending final action on the BLA application. This will ensure that City staff does not spend unnecessary time reviewing a BSP plan that may ultimately be withdrawn or revised. This approach would address the concern expressed in your letter, providing direction as to the application we wish to move forward with. Under City Code, it is not clear why the applicant would need to take the further step of withdrawing the BSP application, even prior to the approval of the BLA. This suggested step appears unnecessary. We appreciate your attention to these applications. Sincerely, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC. L ERIC G. LaBRIE, A.I.C.P, President islesmjobs11886-001-016-00121DocumentlLetter--006 ESM Federal Way ESM Everett 33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98208 253.838.6113 tel 425.297.9900 tel 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345 . 5694 to free 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax Federal Way OF AN 3 i ? 17 ASTER I AND USE APPLICATION DEPArnMToitr CoMMUTY DEV=PMMT CW. FeMPAL WAS 33325 9& Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2:607, Fax 253-835-2609 APPLICATION NO(s) 7 f t✓ O q" 5— J k Date -3/ ,- % '7 Project Name Greenline Technology Center Boundary Line Adjustment Property Address/Location 32901 WEYERHAEUSER WAY S "1a? "'-7-1621049056, 1621049013, and 1621049030 Parcel Number(s) Project Description Adjust existing parcel lines to respect the Tech Center Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding site Plan X Boundary Line Adjustment Comp PimilRezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process [[(Silo Pl=Reviuw) Process III (Project App+oval) Process IV (Homing ExommeesDecision) Process V (Quasi Judicial Rawne) Process VI SEPA wftojcd $EPA Wy Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Vadsrn o: Commercial/Residcatial Required Information CP-01 Caepmsia Park Zoning Nsignstlon C4g=Wa ComprdetisivePlan Designation, NIA Value of Existing Improvements N(A Value ofProposedlmprovements hdww ional BrrUng Code (IBC): Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant Name: Tom Messmer do Federal Way Campus, LLC Add= : 11100 Santo Mantce Bhrd, Suite 860 City/State: Los Angeles, CA Zip: 90025 Phone: 310-261-4382 Fax: Email: r@induslmi In3aliygratip.corn Signature: Agent (if dfentmanAWVcaft) Name: Eric LaBde do ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Address: 33400 Bill Ave South, Sull a 2W City/gam: Federal Way, WA Zip: wM Phpme: 2594MG113 Fax Email: ociedabr eQmneiv9l.oem Owner Nerve: Tom Messmer do Federal Way Campus, LLC Address: 11100 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 850 CBy/Stsi Los Angeles, CA Zip: 900?5 Phone: 3lo mi4m Fax: Email: ei&ndustria}n�ttygroup.eam Sig�tz= Bulletia 0003 — January 1, 2011 Page i of 1 1-.*iwuiows%aswr Land Use Application I,p CONSULTING ENGINEERS LLC January 30, 2017 RECEIVED Job No.1886-001-016-0012 JAN 3 12017 Mr. Brian Davis Community Development Directof %TY OF FEDERAL WAY City of Federal Way CDS 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way WA 98003 Re: Federal Way Campus, LLC Greenline Technology Center, Boundary Line Adjustment Dear Mr. Davis: ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, on behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC, is herein submitting a land use application to the City of Federal Way to process a Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) for the property surrounding the existing Greenline Technology Center (formerly known as the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center). The applicant is seeking the appropriate approvals to adjust the existing parcel lines to respect the existing Technology Center building and its parking lots. The project is located at 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way S. and includes King County tax parcel numbers 162104-9013, 162104-9030 and 162104-9056, which encompass approximately 104.55 acres of CP-1 zoned property in the City of Federal Way. The site spans from Interstate 5 on the west to North Lake on the east, and is generally located between S 336th Street and S 323rd Street The property lines, as they exist today, bisect the Technology Center and its associated parking so that neither of these improvements are wholly located on a single parcel. Federal Way Campus, LLC would like to remedy this situation through the BLA process using the minimum number of parcels possible. The resulting property lines will locate the building and associated parking on a single parcel. We understand that there is a current application pending with the City for a Binding Site Plan (BSP) that includes the subject property. Please note that while the three parcels involved with the BLA are also included in the BSP application, the end goal of these two land use entitlements is different. We also believe that they can be processed concurrently since the ultimate boundary of the BSP remains unchanged regardless of how the internal parcels are configured. The goal of the BSP is to subdivide the property for future development of a business park, while the goal of the BLA is to realign internal parcels to respect an existing improvement; therefore they do not conflict or achieve the same purpose. ESM Federal Way ESM Everett 33400 Sth Ave 5, Ste 205 1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210 —.1 �nguiec- -�••- • •-•• Land Surveying, Landscape A Federal Way, WA98003 Everett, WA98208 425.297.9900tel 3D Laser Scanning GIS 253.838.6113tel 800.345.5694 toll free 800.345.5694toll free www.esmcivil corn 253.838.7104 fax 425.297.9901 fax Mr. Brian Davis January 30, 2017 Page 2 In reviewing the Federal Way Revised Code chapter regarding Boundary Line Adjustments (FWRC 18.10) and Bulletin #038 (dated Nov. 10, 2016), it does not appear that a Pre - Application meeting is required for this type of land use application. While we have not applied for a formal pre -application meeting, we have discussed this concept with City Staff in meetings held on January 3rd and 4th, 2017. Based on our experience with a prior BLA application, we understand that it is the City's position that critical areas are to be shown on the BLA maps. With this in mind, we have included delineated wetlands and the shoreline of North Lake on the maps and are including four (4) copies of a critical area delineation prepared by Talasaea Associates that covers this property. Enclosed with this letter, please find the following materials, which comprise a complete application for processing pursuant to FWRC 18.10.030: 1. Master Land Use Application, signed by Applicant and Owner (1 copy); 2. Title Report, less than 1 year old (2 copies); 3. Proof of Signing Authority (1 copy); 4. BLA Drawings, including a site plan and survey (6 copies); 5. Lot Closure Calculations (2 copies); 6. Critical Area Delineation report (4 copies); 7. "Before and After" Exhibit for general reference (2 copies); and 8. BLA Application Fee (Check for $` 166VW Please contact us immediately if you need any additional information or if you have any comments regarding our application. Thank you in advance for your attention to this project and we look forward to working with you through the process. Very truly yours, ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, L.L.C. MATT REIDER Planner II Enc. Ilesm8leng rlesm-jobs1188610011016-00121documentl letter-002.docx 11100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 850 IRGLos Angeles, CA 90025 industrial Realty Group, LLC (310) 806-4434 www.industrialrealtygroup.com October 3, 2016 RECEIVED VIA EMAIL Mr. Scott Sproul City of Federal Way 33400 8"' Avenue South Ste. 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 JAN 312017 CM OF FEDERAL WAY CD5 RE: Torn Messmez133G63 Weyerhaeuser Wa Federal Way. WA Dear Mr. Sproul: We are the owners of the property located at 33663 Weyerhaeuser Way, Federal Way, Washington. Please be advised that Tom Messmer works for Industrial Realty Group, LLC as Vice President. He has the authority to sign on behalf of Federal Way Campus, LLC in connection with the development of the property. Please contact us with any questions. Very truly yours, INDUSTRIAL REALTY GROUP, LLC By: Jo A ase, Chief Executive Officer S:UAMILICHTER\Federal Way, WA (Weyerhaeuser)1EnvironmentallMessmer Ltr.docx - Los Angeles • New York - Sacramento • Chicago • Akron • Cleveland • Columbus - Cincinnati • Detroit RESUBMITTED SEP 19 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 0GMMUNIIY DEVELOPMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT TECH CENTER BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT (PARCELS G,H&1) FEDERAL WAY CAMPUS, LLC FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Prepared For. Tom Messmer Federal Way Campus, LLC a 8847 Imperial Highway, Suite H Downey, CA 90242 Prepared By. TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Woodinville, Washington 29 March 2017 (Revised 1 September 2017) Existing Conditions Report Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels G, H & 1) Federal Way Campus, LLC Federal Way, Washington Prepared For. Tom Messmer Federal Way Campus, LLC 8847 Imperial Highway, Suite H Downey, CA 90242 Prepared By: Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 150250 Bear Creek Road NE Woodinville, Washington 98077 29 March 2017 (Revised 1 September 2017) Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT NAME: Tech Center Boundary Line Adjustment (Parcels G, H, & 1) PROPERTY LOCATION: The approximate address for the Property is 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South in the City of Federal Way, Washington. The project will take place on three parcels (King County Parcel numbers 1621049056, 1621049013, and 1621049030). The Public Land Survey System location of the Property is Sections 15 and 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. CLIENT: Tom Messmer, Vice President, Federal Way Campus, LLC PROJECT STAFF: Bill Shiels, Principal; Jennifer Marriott, PWS, Senior Ecologist; David Teesdale, PWS, Senior Wetland Ecologist; Richard Tveten, Senior Ecologist; and Kristen Numata, Ecologist. FIELD SURVEY: Property evaluations and wetland delineations were performed on multiple days from December 2015 through April 2016. DETERMINATION: Forty-two (42) wetlands were identified on or adjacent to the Property. One stream is located on the Property, which originates from the Weyerhaeuser Technical Center stormwater pond discharge within the southern portion of the Property. North Lake occurs east of the Property. Weyerhaeuser Pond is located approximately 150 feet south of the Property. HYDROLOGY: Hydrology for the on -site wetlands is supported, for the most part, by seasonal precipitation and interception of surface water flow, as well as groundwater to a lesser extent. SOILS: The NRCS maps one type of soil over the majority of the Property, Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes. A small area in the northwest corner is mapped as Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 8-15% slopes. The National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils does not include Alderwood gravelly sandy loam as a hydric soil. VEGETATION: The Property is mix of developed areas, conifer and deciduous mixed forests, and an open field. Typical native species present within the forested areas include Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesi►), western red cedar (Thuja plicata), big -leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), red alder (Alnus rubra), black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), vine maple (Acer circinatum), salal (Gaultheria shallon), sword fern (Polystichum munitum), and other native shrub and herbaceous species. Several non-native species of tree are present throughout the property, including several species of eastern oak (Quercus spp.) and European ash (Fraxinus excelsior). Typical vegetation within the wetlands includes salmonberry and Douglas' spirea (Spiraea douglash) with limited amounts of sedges and rushes. 1 September 2017 Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page i Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary ......................................................................................................... i Tableof Contents.............................................................................................................ii Listof Figures.................................................................................................................. iii Listof Tables.................................................................................................................. iii Listof Appendices ........................................................................................................... iii Chapter1. Introduction................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of Report ...............................................................................1 1.2 Statement of Accuracy........................................................................1 1.3 Qualifications.......................................................................................1 Chapter 2. Property Description.................................................................................. 2 2.1 Property Location................................................................................ 2 2.2 Existing Property Development........................................................... 2 Chapter3. Methodology.............................................................................................. 2 3.1 Background Data Reviewed .................... ................... ......................... 3 3.2 Field Investigation..............................................................................3 Chapter4. Results....................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Analysis of Existing Information...........................................................4 4.1.1 USGS Quadrangle..............................................................................4 4.1.2 National Wetland Inventory ................................................................. 4 4.1.3 Natural Resources Conservation Service ............................................ 5 4.1.4 King County GIS Database................................................................. 5 4.2 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Wetlands ......................................... 5 4.2.1 Wetlands AE, AF and AH.................................................................... 5 4.2.2 Wetland AG......................................................................................... 6 4.2.3 Wetlands Al, AJ, AL, AO, BS (South), KD, KF, KG, and KN ............... 6 4.2.4 Wetland AV......................................................................................... 6 4.2.5 Wetland BD North............................................................................... 6 4.2.6 Wetland BK......................................................................................... 7 4.2.7 Wetland BL..........................................................................................7 4.2.8 Wetland BR......................................................................................... 7 4.2.9 Wetland BS (North)............................................................................. 7 4.2.10 Wetland DE......................................................................................... 7 4.2.11 Wetlands DF, DG, DH, DI, DJ............................................................. 7 4.2.12 Wetland El ...........................................................................................8 4.2.13 Wetlands EJ, EK, EL, EM....................................................................8 4.2.14 Wetland FA.......................................................................................... 8 4.2.15 Wetland FB.......................................................................................... 8 4.2.16 Wetland FD......................................................................................... 8 4.2.17 Wetland FE..........................................................................................8 4.2.18 Wetland FF..........................................................................................8 4.2.19 Wetland GB (North)............................................................................. 9 4.2.20 Wetland PG (Previously identified as Wetland BJ).............................. 9 4.3 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Waterbodies.................................... 9 4.4 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Other Features ................................ 9 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page ii I I Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & Conditions Report Chapter 5. Regulatory Review...................................................................................10 5.1 City of Federal Way Zoning Code.....................................................10 5.2 Shoreline Management Zone............................................................10 5.3 Non-SMZ Wetlands...........................................................................10 5.4 Streams.............................................................................................11 Chapter 6. Wildlife Surveys and Habitat Assessments..............................................11 Chapter7. Summary .................................................................................................13 Chapter8. References.............................................................................................. 14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 — Vicinity Map and Driving Directions Figure 2 — Property Parcel Map Figure 3 — USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map �l Figure 4 — NRCS Soils Map J Figure 5 — Existing Conditions Map Figures occur at the end of the report. LIST OF TABLES Table 1 — FWRC Wetland Buffer Requirements (FWRC 19.145.420) APPENDICES Appendix A: Wetland Determination Data Forms, Talasaea Consultants, 2016 Appendix B: Feature Summary Table, Talasaea Consultants, 2017 Appendix C: Photodocument, Talasaea Consultants, 2017 Appendix D: Wetland Rating Forms with Figures, Talasaea Consultants, 2017 J I 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page iii Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existina Conditions CHAPTER 1.INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Report This report is the result of an existing conditions study for a 105-acre project area that is a part of the Federal Way Campus, LLC (FWC, LLC) property (referred to hereinafter as the "Property"). The Property is located in Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). The Property is comprised of three parcels identified as Parcels G, H, and I (King County tax parcel numbers 1621049056, 1621049013 and 1621049030) (Figure 2). This report has been prepared to comply with the requirements of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.145.080 — Critical area report to summarize the existing conditions of the Property. No site development impacts or mitigation are included within this report. This report will provide and describe the following information: • General property description; • Methodology for critical areas investigation; • Results of critical areas background review and field investigation; • Existing site conditions; and • Regulatory review. 1.2 Statement of Accuracy Stream and wetland characterizations were conducted by trained professionals at Talasaea Consultants, Inc., and adhered to the protocols, guidelines, and generally accepted industry standards available at the time the work was performed. The conclusions in this report are based on the results of analyses performed by Talasaea Consultants and represent our best professional judgment. To that extent and within the limitation of project scope and budget, we believe the information provided herein is accurate and true to the best of our knowledge. Talasaea does not warrant any assumptions or conclusions not expressly made in this report, or based on information or analyses other than what is included herein. 1.3 Qualifications Field investigations and evaluations were conducted by Bill Shiels, Principal; Jennifer Marriott, PWS, Senior Ecologist; David R. Teesdale, PWS, Senior Wetland Ecologist; Richard Tveten, Senior Ecologist; and Kristen Numata, Ecologist. Bill Shiels has a Bachelor's Degree in Biology from Central Washington University and a Master's Degree in Biological Oceanography from the University of Alaska. He has over 40 years of experience in wetland delineations and mitigations. Jennifer Marriott has a Bachelor's Degree and a Master's Degree in Biology from University of Central Florida, and a second Master's Degree in Soil and Environmental Science from the University of Florida. She has over 13 years of experience in wetland delineations and environmental permitting. David Teesdale has a Bachelor's Degree in Biology from Grinnell College, Iowa, and a Master's Degree in Ecology from Illinois State University. He has 20 years of experience in wetland delineations and biological evaluations. Richard Tveten has a Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Biology from 1 September 2017 Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 1 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report Western Washington University with a focus on terrestrial ecology and fire ecology, respectively. Richard has worked for the public and private sectors for 20 years in wetlands, water quality, and forest management. Kristen Numata has a Bachelor's Degree in Biology and Environmental Science from Santa Clara University. CHAPTER 2.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2.1 Property Location The Property is comprised of three parcels currently owned by Federal Way Campus, LLC. The approximate address is 32901 Weyerhaeuser Way South in the City of Federal Way, Washington. The Property is approximately 105 acres in size. The remainder of the associated parcels under FWC, LLC ownership are not a part of this project. The Public Land Survey System location of the Property is Section 16, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. The topography of the Property is gently sloping downhill from the north to the south. The Property is bound to the east by Weyerhaeuser Way South and North Lake. Undeveloped parcels owned by Federal Way Campus, LLC are adjacent to the Property to the south. Interstate 5 abuts the western side of the Property. An office park is located north of the Property, though two of the parcels abutting the Property are currently vacant (and also owned by FWC, LLC). The Greenline Headquarters building, formerly the Weyerhaeuser headquarters building, is located south of the Property across Weyerhaeuser Pond. 2.2 Existing Property Development The Property is currently developed with the Weyerhaeuser Tech Center and associated infrastructure including six parking lots, paved roads, access roads and a private trail system surround the building and adjacent forested area. The buildings and infrastructure were constructed in 1978. The stormwater pond on -site collects runoff from approximately 2/3 of the development, and conveys the treated water downstream through a man-made channel (Stream AC). The channel flows southward under South 336th Street to its confluence with a perennial stream that connects North Lake to the Weyerhaeuser Pond. An open field is located in the southwest corner of the Property. Roughly half of the Property contains conifer/deciduous mixed forests, though the forested areas are separated by the roads and broadly -spaced parking configuration. The remaining roughly half of the Property is split between maintained open field and the existing facilities and infrastructure. CHAPTER 3.1VIETHODOLOGY The critical areas analysis of the Property involved a two-part effort. The first part consisted of a preliminary assessment of the Property and the immediate surrounding area using published environmental information. This information includes: 1) Wetland and soils information from resource agencies; 2) Critical Areas information from King County and the City of Federal Way; 3) Orthophotography and LIDAR imagery; and, 4) Relevant studies completed or ongoing in the vicinity of the Property. 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 2 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report The second part consisted of Property investigations where direct observations and measurements of existing environmental conditions were made. Observations included plant communities, soils, hydrology, and stream conditions. This information was used to help characterize the Property and define the limits of critical areas on -site and off - site for regulatory purposes (see Section 3.2 — Field Investigation below). 3.1 Background Data Reviewed Background information from the following sources was reviewed prior to field investigations: • US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Wetlands Online Mapper (National Wetlands Inventory) (USFWS, 2017) (www.wetl_a ndsfws. er. u sg s. gov/wtlnd s/la u nch.htm I ); • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), Web Soil Survey (NRCS, 2017) (www.wet}soilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/); • King County GIS Database (King County iMap, 2017); • Orthophotography from USDA's National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP 2017), Earth Explorer (USGS), and Google Earth; • Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) Mapper; • Salmonscape (WDFW) (httg://wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonseape); • StreamNet (The Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission) hftp,//www.streamnet.o[g/data/interactive-maps-and-gis-data/) • USFWS listed species data; and • National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 3.2 Field Investigation Talasaea Consultants originally evaluated the Property as part of a larger effort for Federal Way Campus, LLC beginning in December 2015. Talasaea re -verified the wetland boundaries in April 2016 once water levels returned to a normal state after the extremely high rains of December 2015. Wetland boundaries were adjusted a final time following a site visit on 3 August 2017 with the City of Federal Way's wetland consultant, Environmental Science Associates (ESA). For the purposes of this report, Talasaea evaluated wetlands within the Property and within 100 feet of the Property. Our wetland delineation utilized the routine approach described in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Western Mountain, Valleys, and Coast Regions (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2010). Ordinary high water marks (OHWM) were established based on the DOE guidance document Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark for Shoreline Management Act Compliance in Washington State (DOE Publication #16-06-029, March 2010). Plant species were identified according to the taxonomy of Hitchcock and Cronquist (Hitchcock, et al. 1969). Taxonomic names were updated and plant wetland status was assigned according to North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List, Version 2.4.0 (Lichvar, et al. 2012). Wetland classes were determined with the U.S. 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 3 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report Fish and Wildlife Service's system of wetland classification (Cowardin, et al. 1979). Vegetation was considered hydrophytic if greater than 50% of the dominant plant species had a wetland indicator status of facultative or wetter (i.e., facultative, facultative wetland, or obligate wetland). Wetland hydrology was determined based on the presence of hydrologic indicators listed in the Corps' Regional Supplement. These indicators are separated into Primary Indicators and Secondary Indicators. To confirm the presence of wetland hydrology, one Primary Indicator or two Secondary Indicators must be demonstrated. Indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not necessarily limited to: drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition, watermarks, stream gauge data and flood predictions, historical records, visual observation of saturated soils, and visual observation of inundation. Soils on the Property were considered hydric if one or more of the hydric soil indicators listed in the Corps Regional Supplement were present. Indicators include presence of organic soils, reduced, depleted, or gleyed soils, or redoximorphic features in association with reduced soils. An evaluation of patterns of vegetation, soil, and hydrology was made along the interface of wetland and upland. Wetland boundary points were then determined from this information and marked with wire flags or surveyors tape. Appendix A contains data forms prepared by Talasaea for representative locations in both upland and wetland locations. These data forms document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology information that aided in the wetland boundary determination. Due to the small size of a number of wetlands, not every wetland has a paired set of datasheets. CHAPTER 4.RESULTS This section describes the results of our in-house research and field investigations. 4.1 Analysis of Existing Information The following sources provided information on -site conditions based on data compiled from resource agencies and local government. 4.1.1 USGS Quadrangle The Property occurs on the Poverty Bay quadrangle. No features are mapped on the property; however, the quad map indicates North Lake and Weyerhaeuser Pond in close proximity to the Property to the east and south, respectively. Wetlands are shown along the north shoreline of North Lake. No stream features are indicated on this map. 4.1.2 National Wetland Inventory The National Wetland Inventory maps North Lake adjacent to the Property as two (2) non -wetland classifications: Lacustrine, Littoral, Aquatic Bed, Permanently Flooded (L2ABH) and Lacustrine, Limnetic, Unconsolidated Bottom, Permanently Flooded (L1 UBH) (Figure 3). No wetlands or streams are mapped within the Property. Additional wetlands are mapped in the general vicinity of the Property but are more than 100 feet from the parcel boundaries. 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 4 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report 4.1.3 Natural Resources Conservation Service The NRCS maps one type of soil over the majority of the Property, Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes (Figure 4). Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 8-15% slopes is mapped over a small area in the northwest corner of the Property. A small area of open water is mapped where the parcel lines overlap North Lake. The National Technical Committee on Hydric Soils does not include Alderwood gravelly sandy loam as a hydric soil. 4.1.4 King County GIS Database King County does not map any critical areas on the Property, but North Lake is mapped as a wetland unit. 4.2 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Wetlands Talasaea Consultants performed an initial delineation of on -site wetlands beginning in December 2015. Talasaea re -verified the wetland boundaries in April 2016 as the initial delineations were completed after several atypically high rainfall events. Forty-two (42) wetlands were identified on or adjacent to the Property (Figure 5). The wetlands were segregated into those wetlands occurring within the Shoreline Management Zone (SMZ) or outside of the SMZ. A complete table outlining the wetland classification, size, and other information of all the on -Property wetlands can be found in Appendix B. Much of this area is underlain by glacial till. This dense material frequently possesses inclusions consistent with redoximorphic features except they lack the diffuse boundaries characteristic of active wetland hydrology. This material is also very difficult to dig through for complete soil profiling. In addition, a number of non-native species of trees occur along the existing gravel roads, having been planted over the years. A large area immediately west and southwest of the Tech Center was completely cleared of the native conifers sometime between 1980 and 1990, and replanted primarily with European ash trees. This area has since regrown with the European ash being dominant is some areas, and the remainder dominated by a combination of black cottonwood and red alder with scattered Western red cedar. These areas coincide with the location of many of the delineated wetlands, which are small depressions in the landscape that are likely residual from the clearcutting effort of the 1980s. One man-made stream exits from the stormwater pond and flows off -Property to the south. Several ditch -outs and old log skid trails occur through the western woods on - Property that hold water during the winter but neither convey water nor meet the wetland definition. The wetland labels are non -sequential as the wetlands were delineated as part of a larger effort. General descriptions for the on -site wetlands can be found below. No descriptions are provided for off -site wetlands. Photographs of typical conditions within the wetlands, including typical uplands and access roads, are included within Appendix C. 4.2.1 Wetlands AE, AF and AH Wetlands AE, AF, and AH are small, depressional palustrine emergent wetlands located south of the stormwater pond. Hydrology is provided seasonally by the stormwater 1 September 2017 Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 5 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & Existing Conditions Report pond through surface water and groundwater leakage from the pond, which collects runoff from the entire Weyerhaeuser Tech Center. Typical vegetation includes sedges and rushes, such as soft rush and slough sedge. 4.2.2 Wetland AG Wetland AG is a palustrine forested/scrub-shrub wetland located around the stormwater pond. This wetland occurs at the toe of the slope of the berm surrounding the stormwater pond, and it is likely that hydrology comes from groundwater seeping through the berm as well as surface water from the vicinity. This wetland extends south along either side of Stream AC, the constructed discharge of the stormwater pond. Typical vegetation is red alder, black cottonwood, and salmonberry. 4.2.3 Wetlands Al, AJ, AL, AO, BS (South), KID, KF, KG, and KN These wetlands are a series of palustrine emergent wetlands located within the maintained field that dominates the southwest corner of the Property. Some of these wetlands occur at the toe of slope of an old spoil pile where material excavated from the southern half of the stormwater pond during its construction was stockpiled some years ago and left. The mosaic of wetlands occur in a broad shallow slope that extends off - site from the center of the field south towards 336th Street. Consolidated till is very shallow within this entire area, thus precipitation has nowhere to drain except south through the upper 12" of the soil. These wetlands are all a result of previous man-made disturbances within this area, and generally serve few wetland functions beyond a limited water quality function. Wetlands located in the open field were delineated in December to January 2016, and re -delineated in April 2016 after the heavy rain concluded. The open field has a history of being mowed regularly, as evident by the tire ruts throughout the field. 4.2.4 Wetland AV Wetland AV is a medium sized wetland -upland mosaic located to the west of the Tech Center. Wetland AV is classified as a palustrine forested wetland. Typical species include red alder, salmonberry and creeping buttercup. This is part of an area that was planted with European ash, located in clear rows. This general area has poor drainage due to disturbance over the past few decades that has resulted in ponded water within small depressional pockets through these woods. Many of these pocket wetlands were delineated based on the presence of hydrology and hydric soils as the vegetation across a broad area is facultative. 4.2.5 Wetland BD North Wetland BD North is a large lakeshore wetland associated with North Lake. The entirety of this wetland extends off -site to the north and to the south. This wetland is mostly forested and is dominated by red alder and salmonberry. Hydrology for Wetland BD North is supported by the lake, surrounding uplands, and Weyerhaeuser Way South. During the winter site visits, water was observed sheet flowing across the gravel path upslope into the wetland. 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 6 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & I Conditions 4.2.6 Wetland BK Wetland BK is a small palustrine scrub -shrub sloped wetland located between Weyerhaeuser Way S and North Lake. Vegetation is dominated by salmonberry. Hydrology is generally provided by precipitation and shallow groundwater. 4.2.7 Wetland BL Wetland BL is a medium palustrine scrub -shrub sloped wetland located between Weyerhaeuser Way S and North Lake. Vegetation is dominated by salmonberry. Hydrology is supported by precipitation and shallow groundwater. 4.2.8 Wetland BR Wetland BR is a pocket of wetland located west of the stormwater pond. This wetland occurs at the edge of the forested area, immediately east of a gravel road that is used to access this portion of the Property. This wetland is a collection of small depressional pockets that contain soft rush and various sedges, with small areas of salmonberry and red elderberry. Western red cedar and red alder also occur within the wetland. Hydrology is generally provided through the interception of shallow ground water and precipitation. Some overland flow is likely provided from Wetland AG with higher rainfall or increased discharges from the stormwater pond. 4.2.9 Wetland BS (North) Wetland BS (North) is a palustrine forested wetland located in a depression between two parking lots north of the tech center. Vegetation within the wetland is dominated by salmonberry, tall manna grass, and soft rush with quaking aspen and red alder present as well. Hydrology for BS (North) is supported by parking lot runoff and precipitation. 4.2.10 Wetland DE Wetland DE is a large palustrine forested wetland located west of the Tech Center. Vegetation within the wetland is dominated by European ash, soft rush, a variety of sedges and facultative grasses. Hydrology for Wetland DE is provided by precipitation and interception of surface flows. This is part of an area that was planted with European ash, located in clear rows. This general area has poor drainage due to disturbance over the past few decades that has resulted in ponded water within small depressional pockets through these woods. 4.2.11 Wetlands DF, DG, DH, DI, DJ Wetlands DF, DG, DH, DI, DJ, and DO are a series of wetlands located within the woods between Wetland DE and the Tech Center. These wetlands are classified as palustrine forested, and are dominated by black cottonwood, European ash, Douglas spirea, salmonberry, and Dewey's sedge. Hydrology for these wetlands is provided by precipitation and interception of surface flows. This is part of an area that was planted with European ash, located in clear rows. This general area has poor drainage due to disturbance over the past few decades that has resulted in ponded water within small depressional pockets through these woods. 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 7 J Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report 4.2.12 Wetland El Wetland El is a small palustrine forested wetland located northwest of the Tech Center. Vegetation within the wetland is dominated by salmonberry and ruffled starwort. Soils were hydric, and hydrology for this wetland is provided by precipitation and interception of surface flows. 4.2.13 Wetlands EJ, EK, EL, EM Wetlands EJ, EK, EL, and EM are a cluster of wetlands located northwest of the Tech Center. These wetlands are located within an area dominated by deciduous tree species, the conifers have been logged out years ago. These wetlands are classified as palustrine scrub -shrub and are dominated by salmonberry. Hydrology for Wetlands EJ, EK, EL and EM is provided by precipitation and interception of surface flows. The wetland boundaries were delineated based on the presence of wetland hydrology and hydric soils since many species in the area were facultative wetland species. 4.2.14 Wetland FA Wetland FA is a palustrine scrub -shrub wetland located along the northern property line. The majority of this wetland occurs off -site to the north. Vegetation within the wetland is dominated by red alder and salmonberry. Hydrology for FA is provided through precipitation and interception of surface flows. 4.2.15 Wetland FB Wetland FB is a palustrine scrub -shrub wetland located along the northern property line in the northeast corner of the property. Vegetation within the wetland is dominated by young Oregon ash and salmonberry. Hydrology for FB is provided through precipitation and interception of surface flows. 4.2.16 Wetland FD Wetland FD is a palustrine forested wetland located north of the Tech Center that abuts a pipeline right-of-way. This wetland resulted from the impoundment of water behind a berm created through the installation of a pipeline across this area. Hydrology for FD is provided through precipitation and interception of surface flows. 4.2.17 Wetland FE Wetland FE is a palustrine forested wetland located north of the Tech Center by the outdoor volleyball court, adjacent to a gravel road. Portions of this wetland appear to have been artificially excavated, and given the location of this feature near the highest point across the Property, this wetland formed through the impoundment of water because the gravel road acts as a berm. Vegetation within the wetland includes red alder, salmonberry, a large rhododendron shrub, and creeping buttercup. Hydrology for FE is provided through precipitation and interception of surface flows. J 4.2.18 Wetland FF Wetland FF is a palustrine scrub -shrub wetland located north of the Tech Center. This wetland resulted from the impoundment of water behind a berm created through the installation of a pipeline across this area. Vegetation within the wetland is dominated by 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 8 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions red alder, salmonberry, and lady fern. Hydrology for FF is provided through precipitation and interception of surface flows. 4.2.19 Wetland GB (North) Wetland GB (North) is a palustrine scrub -shrub wetland located west of the tech center. Vegetation within the wetland is dominated by red -osier dogwood and reed canarygrass. Hydrology for GB (North) is provided through precipitation and interception of surface flows. 4.2.20 Wetland PG (Previously identified as Wetland BJ) Wetland PG is a large wetland located in the southeastern corner of the Property between Weyerhaeuser Way S and North Lake. This wetland is classified as both a palustrine forested and scrub -shrub sloped wetland. 4.3 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Waterbodies No natural streams occur within the Property. A number of ditches and swales occur across the property in association with the gravel and paved roads. These ditches and swales all connect to the on -site stormwater facility in some fashion, either through direct surface connections or via the pipes that drain the roads and parking areas to the on -site stormwater pond. The combined ditches and swales mentioned do not exhibit the characteristics which may classify them as seasonal or ephemeral streams. This pond then discharges through a man-made conveyance that ultimately flows into Weyerhaeuser Pond through a connection to a natural stream. The combined streams flow for approximately 600 feet before entering the Weyerhaeuser Pond. The Weyerhaeuser Pond then discharges south through a structure into a buried pipe that is located underneath the main former Weyerhaeuser Headquarters Building. The flows from this stormwater pond and associated channel ultimately enter the Hylebos Creek several miles south of the Property. This conveyance feature, identified as Stream AC for the purposes of this report, has not been maintained over the years and has become more naturalized, despite the primary source of flow being the stormwater pond discharge. Stream AC starts at the stormwater pond outlet, but also collects water from the adjacent wetlands. The flow regime of this stream is directly tied to the discharges from the stormwater pond. While this feature was artificially created, its connection to fish -bearing waters and naturalization over time ensures that this feature has at least the potential to sustain fish habitat. A small section of the Project Area is adjacent to North Lake. North Lake is located within the Shoreline Management Zone, which is outlined below, and has a 50-foot lakeshore buffer. 4.4 Analysis of Existing Conditions — Other Features A number of man-made depressional features occur across the landscape that neither convey water nor meet the definition of a wetland. These features appear to be remnants from when this forest was logged in the 1980s shortly after the construction of 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 9 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report the Tech Center. Some of the features were likely dug for surface water management to ensure the gravel paths through the woods remained free from ponded water. These features rarely connected to wetlands, but where they did, they were delineated as part of the wetland where appropriate. These man-made features would not require buffers as they are all non -jurisdictional features. CHAPTER 5.REGULATORY REVIEW 5.1 City of Federal Way Zoning Code An existing Concomitant Pre -Annexation Zoning Agreement was developed in 1994 between the City of Federal Way and the Weyerhaeuser Company, which transfers to subsequent landowners. The Concomitant Agreement uses the guidelines outlined in Section 22-1357 of Ordinance 99-353 of the 1994 Federal Way Code (FWC). Despite the agreement, the 1994 FWC was not used to evaluate critical areas and setbacks within the Property. Chapters 15 and 19 of the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) have been used to evaluate the wetlands and streams to determine their appropriate buffers. 5.2 Shoreline Management Zone North Lake is listed as a Shoreline of the State, and thus is located within the SMZ for the Department of Ecology and the City of Federal Way. Shorelands extend for 200 feet from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) for North Lake and include Wetland BD North as well as other wetlands that occur within this area. In addition to the 50-foot lakeshore buffer, these areas along the shoreline of North Lake have additional protections under the SMZ, which require additional coordination for any modifications within this area. Wetlands identified within the Shoreline Management Zone are rated under FWRC 15.10.250. Instead of a formal rating system, wetlands must meet certain criteria to be classified as either a Category I, Category II, or Category III wetland. Category wetlands require a 200-foot buffer, while Category 11 wetlands require a 100 foot buffer. Category III wetlands greater than 10,000 sf require a 50-foot buffer, and wetlands between 2,500 and 10,000 sf require a 25-foot buffer. Category III wetlands smaller than 2,500 sf do not require a buffer under FWRC. See Appendix B for wetland rating, category and standard buffer. 5.3 Non-SMZ Wetlands Wetlands occurring outside of the SMZ in Federal Way are currently regulated under FWRC 19.145.420. Wetlands regulated under Chapter 19 of the FWRC should be rated using the Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington (2014). The ratings for wetlands determine the appropriate buffer width requirements as specified in the Federal Way Revised Code. Wetland ratings and rating figures can ' be found in Appendix D. Wetlands identified within the Property, but outside of the SMZ, typically rated as a Category III or IV with Habitat Scores ranging from three (3) to six (6). One wetland J rated as a Category II, and no wetlands rated as Category I. Wetland setbacks in the 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. J 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 10 i �J Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Re FWRC are determined first by Category and then by Habitat Score (Table 1). See Appendix B for wetland rating, category and standard buffer. Table 1 — FWRC Wetland Buffer Reauirements (FWRC 19.145.420) Wetland Wetland Buffer Width based on Habitat Score Category 3-4 5 6-7 8-9 Category I: Bogs and wetlands of high 190 feet 190 feet 190 feet 225 feet conservation value Category I: Forested and based on function 75 feet 105 feet 165 feet 225 feet score Category II 75 feet 105 feet 165 feet 225 feet Category III 60 feet 105 feet 165 feet 225 feet Category IV 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 5.4 Streams Type F streams under FWRC 19.145.270 require a 100-foot standard buffer. CHAPTER 6. WILDLIFE SURVEYS AND HABITAT ASSESSMENTS The Property was evaluated for wildlife and habitats concurrently with delineation efforts and observations of additional wildlife were recorded during all field visits since December 2015. The general habitat on the Property is a blend of small depressional, slope, and riparian wetlands, ponds and streams, third -growth Douglas fir forest with a patchy salal/sword fern understory, and a mixed deciduous forest with a primarily salmonberry understory. No unique habitats occur on -site. General wildlife observations during fieldwork included: • Birds: American Robin, Pacific Wren, Canada Goose, Chickadee, Ruby - crowned Kinglet, Red -winged Blackbird, Pileated Woodpecker, Bufflehead, Mallard, American Widgeon, American Crow, American Coot, Pied -billed Grebe, Rufous Hummingbird; • Mammals: mountain beaver (burrows), rabbit, deer, coyote; ■ Amphibians: bullfrogs. Multiple site visits since the initial wetland delineations have added to the list of species identified as occurring on the Property, as well as expanding our timeframe over which we have evaluated this Property. No listed species occur on the Property. A bald eagle nest is mapped on the Washington Priority Habitat and Species database as occurring more than 2,000 feet southeast of the southeast corner of the Property. Sections of one 1 September 2017 Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 11 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report (1) fish -bearing stream is located on the Property. North Lake occurs adjacent to the eastern most parcels of the Property. 6.1.1 Listed Species - Salmonids No listed species were identified as occurring within the Property. However, potentially occurring listed species within the Property include the listed salmon species (Chinook salmon, steelhead, bull trout). No evaluation of potential impacts to listed species was conducted for this Property as no development is proposed through this report. Salmonids have not been observed in any of the streams, North Lake, or Weyerhaeuser Pond within the greater FWC, LLC property. Neither SalmonScape nor StreamNet map any salmonid species as occurring within North Lake, though the lake is noted as being stocked by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife with rainbow trout. The outlet for North Lake is also not mapped with salmon -presence, neither modeled nor actually present. Mapping of salmonids stops south of the Federal Way Campus property, well south of Highway 18. The apparent hindrances restricting salmonid migration into this area appear to be several not -fish -accessible culverts downstream outside of the FWC, LLC property. There is also a long stretch of pipe (roughly 1,600 linear feet) from the Weyerhaeuser pond, under the former Weyerhaeuser headquarters building, to its outlet just north of Highway 18, that is likely problematic for fish passage. 6.1.2 Listed Species - Bald Eagles A bald eagle nest is mapped on the Washington Priority Habitat and Species database as occurring more than 2,000 feet southeast of the southeast corner of the Property. The location of this nest was field verified, though its use status was not. No eagles were observed in or near the nest at the time of survey through the winter of 2015-2016. The nest occurs on a large tree within a large wetland/upland complex located east of an office park, and is visible from the edge of the adjacent commercial office park. The nest occurs across Weyerhaeuser Way South from the Property, and on the opposite side of the office park from the Property. Bald eagles were removed from the federal endangered species list in 2007, and no longer are protected under the Endangered Species Act. However, bald eagles continue to be protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. These Acts prohibit the "taking" of a bald eagle through direct or indirect actions that may disturb the birds enough to disrupt their breeding, foraging, or nesting behaviors. The existing office park and Weyerhaeuser Way South have been in place for many years, and occur between the Property and the mapped nest. No bald eagle nests occur within the Property. Foraging habitat does occur within the Property. Eagles are most likely to forage in and around North Lake or potentially within the open field areas. Bald eagles rarely hunt within densely wooded environments. It is possible eagles may use trees within the Property for roosting. 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 12 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Conditions CHAPTER 7. SUMMARY The Federal Way Campus, LLC Property is an approximately 105-acre assemblage of portions of three (3) parcels located within the City of Federal Way in King County, Washington. The (former) Weyerhaeuser Tech Center already occurs within the Property with associated parking, paved roads, existing gravel access roads, and trails for passive recreation are present on -site. Portions of forty-two (42) wetlands, one (1) stream, and a small section of North Lake were identified on or adjacent to the Property. 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 13 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) CHAPTER &REFERENCES Existing Conditions Report Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior. FWSOBS-70/31. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss. Hitchcock, C.L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. 730 pp. Hruby, T. 2014. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. 2014 Update. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication # 14-06-029. Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X Munsell Color. 1988. Munsell Soil Color Chants. Kollmorgen Instruments Corp., Baltimore, Maryland. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/. Accessed [January 2017]. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. Wetland Regulatory Assistance Program. ERDC/EL TR-10-3 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1989. National Wetlands Inventory Map, Poverty Bay Quadrangle. Washington State Department of Ecology. March 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual. Washington State Department of Ecology. Water Quality Assessment and 303(d) List. 2017. www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/303d (accessed January 2017). Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife [Map Online], Olympia (WA): SalmonScape [January 2017]. URL: <http//wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/salmonscape/index.html> Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2016. Priority Habitats and Species Database [online], Olympia, WA. [accessed January 2017]. <www.wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/> 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 14 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report FIGURES Figure 1 — Vicinity Map and Driving Directions Figure 2 — Property Parcel Map Figure 3 — USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 4 — NRCS Soils Map Figure 5 — Existing Conditions Map 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Page 15 SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. Jrulr a, S 371 sl St a L The Commons %' c w At Federal Way w $ S 3741h St ® ? cn u ® PROJECT AREA CA bration a N lark NORTH w s 33utn � s LAKE Q D 9b, s331�t` rid S' v u rOD, S 3331d St J � n � v g= N S 336ih Si to S 3361h St vt u P ci p — 7 A J < G 2<9 R Cr G KITTS CORNER s340thSi ssals`4t tg S 342nd St rn v Q Pacific Bonsai Museum S 344th St A. rn Ow D N A D 11h St tg � E� } v C) N C DRIVING DIREGTI NS: I. FROM DOHNTOHN SEATTLE TAKE 1-5 SOUTH FOR 10.5 MILES. 2. USE THE 2ND LANE FROM THE RIGHT TO TAKE EXIT 143 FORS 520TH ST TOWARD FEDERAL HAY 3. TAKE A SHARP LEFT ONTO 5 520TH 5T. 4. IN 0.5 MILE5 TURN RIGHT ONTO HEYERHAEUSER HAYS 5. YOUR DESTINATION HILL BE ON THE RIGHT. 7 NORTH 3 SGALE: NTS FIGURE TITLE I DRAWN I TAL# VIGINITI' MAP 4 DRIVING DIREGTIONS MW/A155 1512G TALA AE A REFERENCE APPLICANT I AT. & LONG. NW5-2011-TBD FEDERAL WAY GAMPUS LLG 47.3070°,-122.2953° CONSULTANTS, INC. PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARCELS 6 H AND 1) DATE REVISED Resource & Environmental Planning PURPOSE: EXISTING CONDITIONS 1-26-2017 &-51-2017 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast ADDRESS: 32c101 HEYERHAEUSER WAY 5OUTH FIGURE # Woodinville, Washington 98077 I OF Bus (425)861-7550 - Fax (425)861-7549 CITY COUNTY STATE IN rp FEDFR-AL HAY KING WA UNNAMED WETLANDS l Z:\DRAWING\1506-1599\TAL1572\1572C\Plans\TAL-1572c 8LA Figures (2017-08-31)C C6ppgghtg- Talasaea Consultants, INC. 5EGTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. II PARCEL 6 11 #162104g056 7 NOTES: I. ONLY FEATURES LOCATED IN THE PROJECT AREA OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PARCEL 80UNDARIE-5 ARE SHOWN. rr r i !r/ lli rl 0 // yyyy 1 / PARCEL + r # 1621049050 ,, , / Mn. Y NORTH LAKE 1 1 1 I 1 PARCEL H -PI-AN E6END �� ++ PROJECT AREA - - -PROPERTY LINE ® EXISTING PCTLAND ---- ----NORTH LAKE - OHNM —STREAM CENTERLINE EXI5TIN6 GONTOUR ORAP i I Cs SGALE NORTH ( IN FEET) 0 250 500 1000 SGALE: I "=500' TA LA S A E A CONSULTANTS, INC. Resource & Environmental Planning Wood Bear Creek Road Northeast Woodinville, Washington 96077 Bus (425)661-7550 — Fax (425)661-7549 FIGURE TITLE PARGEL MAP DRAWN MW/ABS TAL# 15'72G REFERENCE NW5-2011-TBD APPLICANT W FEDERAL AY CAMPUS, LLG LAT. & LONG. 47.3070',-122.2953. PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARCELS 6. H AND U DATE 1-26-2017 REVISED 1&-31-201-7 PURPOSE: EXISTING CONDITIONS ADDRESS: 32,101 HEYERHAEU5ER WAY SOUTH FIGURE # � OF j CITY FEDERAL HAY COUNTY STATE KlU WA IN UNNAMED WETLANDS L:tutcntVLNU\louu-15'J9\TAL1572\1572C\Plans\TAL-1572c BLA Figures (2017-08-31)9-CGpp3igbitg- Talasaes Consultants, INC. SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. LE 6ENP TYPE DESGRIPTION PEMI/55F PALUSTRINE EMERGENT PERSISTENT/SGRUB-SHRUB SEMIPERMANENTLY FLOODED P55/EMIC PALUSTRINE SGRUB-SHRUB/EMERGENT PERSISTENT SEASONALLY FLOODED SOURCE: U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVIGE, (NOV 201(b). NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY WEBSITE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVIGE, WASHINGTON D.G. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/wetland-Godes.html NORTH SCALE: NT5 T ALA S A E A CONSULTANTS, INC. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast Woodinville, Washington 98077 Bus (425)861-7550 — Fax (425)661-7549 FIGURE TITLE NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP DRAIPPT TAL# MW/AB5 1572G REFERENCE NW5-2011-TBD APPLICANT FEDERAL WAY GAMPUS LLG LAT. & LONG. 47.3010°-122.2c153° PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARGEL5 G H AND 1) DATE 1-26-2017 I REVISED &-31-2017 PURPOSE: EXISTING GONDITION5 ADDRESS: 32g01 WEYERHAEUSER WAY SOUTH FIGURE # OF CITY FEDERAL WAY COUNTY STATE KING I WA I IN I UNNAMED WETLANDS 2:\DRAWING\1500-1599\TAL1572/1572C/Plana/TAL-1572c BLA Figures (2017-08-31) C-CGppDightg- Talasaea Consultants, INC. SEGTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. LEISEN=) TYPE DESGRI PTION, SLOPES AgB ALDERWOOD GRAVELLY SANDY LOAM, O TO .5 PERGENT SLOPES AgG ALDERWOOD GRAVELLY SANDY LOAM, 8 TO 15 PERGENT SLOPES W WATER SOURGE: SOIL SURVEY STAFF, NATURAL RESOURGES GONSERVATION SERVIGE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRIGULTURE, WEB SOIL SURVEY. AVAILABLE ONLINE AT http://web-5oilEurvey.nrr,5.u5dci.gov/. AGGESSED (1/26/2017). '0 TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast Woodinville, Washington 98077 Bus (425)661-7550 — Fax (425)861-7549 FIGURE TITLE NR65 MAP REFERENCE APPLICANT Nw5-201"1-TBD I FEDERAL HAY GAMPUS. LLG PROPOSED PROJECT: BLA (PARGELS 5, H AN PURPOSE: EX15TINO GONDITIONS ADDRESS: 32901 HEYERHAEUSER HAY 5OUTH CITY COUNTY STATE IN =EDERAL HAYI KING I HA J UNNAMED NORTH SCALE: NT5 DRAWN TAL# MN/ABS 15-72G LAT. & LONG. 4-7.50-70°,-122.2G55- DATE I REVISED 1-26-2017 &-51-201-1 FIGURE # OF rp Z:\DRAWING/1500-15991TAL157211572C'Plans/TAL-1572c BLA Figures (2017-08-31)[C-C6pyA3ightg- Talesaea Consultants, INC. L.-AH L-AF HL.-AE ------ I _ ,— r WL-FD � r � r . -FF r jl1lf� ► � ,;,jlllf �� 1 � �/r iraf Jf � WL-PF / r. I WL-E3E z i WL-BL- NORTH LAKE t WL-SD NORTH (CONTINUES OFF SITE) r-; - ....- - - - - -•---� r ! Ae r � � rSTRUGTU E STORM WATER r OUTFALL. r POND r � i r r �J JAH o i AF r SHALE ' ` _ APPROX. STREAM 1 STREAM - CLOGATION L- - Act=..- 1U� Ri i 1 1, j PLAN LEGEND —a - - — PRO-EGT AREA —PROPERTY LINE — EXISTIN6 i-ETLAND ——I-ETLAND SUFFER •� —STREAM GENTERLINE --� 97%AM BUFFER EXISTING CONTOUR ---------NORTH LAKE - OHMM - - - - - - - - -100 FT PRO.EGT AREA OFFSET NOTES: I. ONLY FEATURES LOCATED IN THE PROJECT AREA OR WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE PARCEL BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN. 2. WETLANDS BD NORTH, PCG(BJ) AND BN CONTINUE OFF SITE. CRAPHIG SGALE NORTH ( IN FEET ) O 250 500 1000 SGALE: I"=500' FIGURE TITLE DRAWN TAL# EX15TINO GONOITIONS MAP MN/ABS 1572G a) REFEREG. TALASAEA NW5-201-7 TBD FEDERALCE PLICA�HAY CAMPUS, LLG 47T3070', -122 2953° CONSULTANTS, INC. PROPOSED PROJECT: EsLA (PARCELS 6 H AND 1) DATE REVISED Resource & Environmental Planning PURPOSE: EXISTING GONDITION5 1-26-2017 1 8-31-2017 Wood Hear Creek Road Northeast ADDRESS: 5290I HEYERHAEU5ER HAY SOUTH FIGURE Woodinville, WashingtonFax 98077)8 # OF Bus (425)881-7550 —Fax (425)881-7549 CITY COUNTY SSTATE IN FEDERAL WAY KING WA UNNAMED WETLANDS so © Copyright - Talasaea Consultants, INC. Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) APPENDIX A Existing Conditions WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORMS, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2016 J 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Appendix A WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federall Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: AV-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21 N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.306750 Long:-122.298169 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINUING5 — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ED Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Located uphill from wetland VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Acer macrophyllum 40 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Populus tremu/oides 35 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 75 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 45 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus armeniacus 25 Y FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = 3. Oem/eria ceraslformis 10 N FACU 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 80 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Dicentra formosa 20 Y FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6 ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 7 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 20 = Total Cover W_aodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 80 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No ED US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: AV-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Dior mais % Redox Features Color f moist) % ivoe Loc' Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-10 10YR 2/2 100 Loam 10-16 10YR 3/2 100 Loam `T e: C=Concentration. D-De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. kocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: No redox features present HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one re uireda check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field ❑bservations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 16 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Record rainfall In recent months. Saturation occurred below 12" depth. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way.!Kinn Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal[ Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: AV-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial Till PI in Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave depression Slope (%): <1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.306750 Long:-122,298169 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 perc nt slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Weland is a disturbed area flanked by roads on 3 sides which has slowed drainage of the area. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 70 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Popu/us tremu/oides 20 Yes FACU 3' Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species SalqjihnqlShrub 5tralum (Plot size: 15ft) 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 1. Rubus spectabilis 50 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheets 2• Total % Cover of: _Multiply bv: 3• OBL species x 1 = 4• FACW species x 2 = 5• FAC species 100 x 3 = 300 50 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. None Column Totals: 100 (A) 300 (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ® Dominance Test is >50% 6. ® Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 = Total Cover Woody Ving Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: AV-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-13 1 OYR 2/1 IN silt I�� OM present 13-16 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 5/8 20 C M Silt Prominent 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De tetion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ® Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks; OM present in upper horizon but insufficient qualities to be muck. Carbon contentdoesn`t feel high enough -no organic carbon testing done. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 4 Secondary Indicators.(2_or more rectuWed� ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wa /Kina Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus LLC State: WA Sampling Point: BD-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM, DRT Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308979 _ Long:-122.290309 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sander loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) .7ummAKT ur rirvuin"a — Ar[acn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30111) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 40 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Acer circinatum 35 Yes FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. Popu/us balsamii'era 20 No FAC Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Pseudotsuga menziesil 5 No FACU Percent of Dominant Species 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) Sa lin (Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. !None Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 0 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Lamiastrum galeobdo/on 1 No NL 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 21 = Total Cover Woody Vine Straturn (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus armeniacus 30 Yes FACU 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. Rubus /aciniatus 5 No FACU be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 35 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 79 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BD-UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix R d x Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type: Loe Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=€'ore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (At0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Imposs ble In dig - extremely compact and suspected old logging road HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (611) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No (D Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe)_ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Record rainfall in recent US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way_gin9 Sampling Date:12119120 15 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Camp_u_s, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: BD-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM, DRT Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1-3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 417.308804 Long:-122.28969 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Aldenvood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 peree_n_.t_slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) oummmmT ur rinuirvuo —_ Atiacn size map snowing sampling point locations, transacts, Important teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Fraxinus lafifoNa 65 Yes FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. 3. 4. 65 = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 60 Yes FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 60 = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum 15 Yes FACU 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 15 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus armeniacus 2 Yes FAC 2. 2 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 85 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 65 x 2 = 130 FAC species 62 x 3 = 186 FACU species 15 x 4 = 60 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 142 (A) 376 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.64 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ® Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BD -WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches.)Color (moist] % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remark 0-12 10YR 2/2 100 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil53: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (All 0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Structure obliterated because of surrounding ponded water. Difficult to describe but assumed hydric from hydrologic indicators. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ® Surface Water (All) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe] Describe Recorded Data Secondary indicators (2 or more_re wired ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1-2 Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1-2 Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: Record rainfail in recent months. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WaylKing Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLG State: WA Sampling Point: BS (N)-UPL Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section_ 16, T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309008 Long:-122.295682 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood orav_elly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) aynrlIVIARi yr rirvuimua — Aiiacn site_map snowing sampling point locations, transacts, important teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: SP located within generally flat area around wetland VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Thuja plrcala 2. 3. 4. Sa lin (Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Gaultheria shallon 2. Rubus spectabilis 3. Oemleria cerasiformis 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum 2. Rubus ursinus 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover _Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 30 = Total Cover 40 Yes FACU 30 Yes FAC 20 Yes FACU 90 = Total Cover 30 Yes FACU 20 Yes FACU 50 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 50 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species 60 x 3 = 180 FACU species 110 x 4 = 440 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 170 (A) 620 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.6 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: BS-UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Cotor moist] % Color moist % hme' Loe Texture Remarks 0 2 Duff 2-8 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam 8-16 10YR 4/3 100 Silly 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) El Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material TF2 ❑ ( ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ElSandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ElNo Remarks: No hydric soil indicators identified HYDROLOGY Primary Indicators (minimum of one re aired: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators 2 or more required ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4113)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (611) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C8 ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 9 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes Capillary fringe) — Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: Record rainfall in recent months. Saturation observed within 12 in of soil subsurface US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WavlKlnq Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: B5 (N)-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial tilt plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 4 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309008 Long:-122.295682 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood_gravelly sandv loam 0 to 8 percentshopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing.sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Wetland located adjacent to parking lot. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. $aplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Glyceria a/ata 2. Juncus effusus 3. Veronica anagallis-aquatica 4. Ranunculus repens 5. 6. 7. 8. Woadv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover i s? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 0 = Total Cover 5 Y FAC 5 = Total Cover 5 N FACW 5 N FACW 2 N OBL 25 Y FAC 37 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 63 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multioly by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 8S(N)-Wl=T1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0 9 10YR 2/1 100 Muck 9-16 10YR 6/1 50 10YR 4/6 50 C M Silt Prominent feature 'Tv e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ® Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 5 Secondary Indicatars_(2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: We erhaeuser City/County: Federal WayXing Counter Sampling Date:12119/2015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC_ State: WA Sampling Point: CB-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): None _.. Slope (%): 2-5% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: Long: Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravel sandy loam. 0-8% slopes NW I classification: PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30) °I° Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Pseudotsuga menziesH 40 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Thuja plicata 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. Alnus rubra 5 N FAC Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 60 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 WB) Saplingl5hrub Stratum (Plot size: 15) 1. Acer circinatum 40 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv: 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4. FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 5. FAC species 60 x 3 = 180 40 = Total Cover FACU species 90 x 4 = 360 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. Polystichum munitum 50 Y FACU Column Totals: 150 (A) 540 (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.6 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 50 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30) 1. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 50 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CB-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 10YR 4-2 100 Silt loam 2-16 7.5YR 4/4 100 Silt loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) [ISandy Mucky Mineral (S1) [IDepleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): I Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes [INo Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indica ors (minimum of one required.- check all that a Secongary Indicators 2 or more re uired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED includes ca Ilia fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/King County Sampling Date: 1 2122i2015 Applicant/Owner: Federal WaV Cam us LLC State: WA Sampling Point: CB-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM DRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Klls-lope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-3 Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.304053 Long:-122.293896 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood aravel sandy loam. 0-8%slopes NWI classification: PFO Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30) °Io ver Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 40 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Fraxinius lar1folia 15 Y FACW 3' Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15) 55 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 WB) 1. None Prevalence Index worksheet: 2• Total % Cover of: Multi ! b 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4• FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 5• FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 0 = Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4= 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 1. None Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 4. Hydrophylic Vegetation Indicators- 5. ® Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CB-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moister % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 'Type: C=-Concentration, D=De ietion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Stream substrate within the braided channels made acquiring a soil sample difficult. Soils that were identified were a 211 sandy loam but could not dig very deep. Assumed hydric from strong hydrologic indicators. HYDROLOGY Primary indicators (minimum of one re_cluired: check all that a ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ® Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth (inches): 4-6 Depth (inches): Secondary indicators (2 or mare re wired ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46)) ® Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ® Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Braided US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: We erhneuser City/County: Federal Way/King County — Sampling Date:12/19/2015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: CD-UPL1 Investigator(s): JMM, DIRT Section, Township, Range: S15 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): non Slope (%): 2-5% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.310362 Long:-122.288643 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood oravel sandyloam. 0-8% slopes NW I classification: PFO/PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30) 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii 2. Thuja plicata 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15) 1. Gaultheria shallon 2. Thuja plisata 3. Ilex aquifolium 4. Arbutus menziesii 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Wood- Vine_Stratum (Plot size: 30) 1. Rubus armeniacus 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 50 Y FACU 15 Y FAC 65 = Total Cover 80 Y FACU 10 N FAC 1 N FACU 1 N NL 92 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover 2 Y FACU 2 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Mountain beaver burrows present Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multioly bv: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 25 x 3 = 75 FACU species 133 x 4 = 532 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 158 (A) 607 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.84 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CD-UPL1 Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color moist % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-2 10YR 2/1 100 Silt l� 2-8 7.5YR 414 100 Slit loam 8-10 10YR 2/1 100 Silt loam_ 10-16+ 7.5YR 4/6 100 Silt loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De lesion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ?Location, PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ElNo Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indira v minimum of one required; check all that appW Secondary,Indicators 2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery 0C9 ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED includes capilIM fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federat Way/KingWay/King County Sampling Date:1211912015 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: CD-WET1 Investigator(s): JMM. DRT Section, Township, Range: S15T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 0-2% Subregion (LRR): LRR-A Lat: 47.310326 Long:-122,288310 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Aldenaood ravel sand loam 0-8% slopes_ NWI classification: PFO/PSS Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30) 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15) 1. Alnus rubra 2. Rubus spectabilis 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stralurn (Plot size: 30) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 10 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 10 = Total Cover 60 Y FAC 40 Y FAC 100 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Mountain beaver burrows inside feature Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: _ Muiiiply bv: ' OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 UPL species 0 x 5 = 0 Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: CD -WET) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color moil % Type' LoC' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 2/1 100 Silt loam T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No El Remarks: Hydric indicators assumed, as hydrologic indicators are strong. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required, heck all that apply) Secondary IndicatoTs_(2_or more resittlred ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (CS ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1-2 Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 2 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ ,includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WayIKirici Sampling Date:7119i2016 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DE-UPL1 Investigator(s): Jennifer Marriott Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain_ Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308117 Long:-121297907 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood.gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. inci SamDlina Doint Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? important features, etc. Yes ❑ No Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Populus tremuloides 40 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 2. 3. 4. 40 = Total Cover Sap_lingfShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Populus tremuloides 30 Y FACU 2. Gaultheria shallon 25 Y FACU 3. 4. 5. 55 = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum 5 N FACU 2. Rubus ursinus 70 Y FACU 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 75 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. N000 2. 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 25 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cove Qf; Multiply bye OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ED US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DE-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist)_ % - Color moist % Tyne' Locz Texture Remarks 1-16 10YR 313 100 loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ElSandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ElDepleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: No hydric soil indicators identified HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary, Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that anoly) Secondary Indicators 2 or nore reuired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 4113)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available wetland hyrology indicators identified I J US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 J WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser —City/County: Federal Wav/King Sampling Date:711912016 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way. Campus, LLG State: WA Sampling Point: DE-WET1 Investigator(s): Jennifer Marriott Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial tilt glain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308117 Long:-122.297907 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: This atypical wetland occurs within a broad area where the till is shallow; the delineation includes area of upland as the wetland winds through the trees. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Populus balsamifera 30 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Fraxinus excelsior 60 Y NL Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5ap(ingl5hrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) i 1. Fraxinus excelsior 80 Y NL Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus spectabilis 20 Y FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species 50 x 3 = 150 100 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. None Column Totals: 50 (A) 150 (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.0 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ® Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ® Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. !None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Fraxinus excelsior (European ash) is considered to be a wetland plant in Europe. We can safely assume this test plot represents hydrophytic vegetation. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DE -WET Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' toe, Texture Pemarks 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 Silty loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No El Remarks: Soil was very dry, hardpan at 12 inches. Soil is assumed to be hydric based on hydrology and hydrophytic plants. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re uired: check all that a I SecondaEy Indicators J2 or more r uired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ® Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Surface ponding and saturation within the upper 12" was previously noted in January 2016 though wetland hydrology was not present at our evaluation in April 2016. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/Kin4 Sampling Date:4016 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus LLC_ State: WA Sampling Point: DF-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial HI plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308059 Long:-122.297303 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent Slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover ies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Abies grandis 40 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) 2. Fraxinus excelsior 40 Yes NL Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 80 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Oem/eria cerasiformis 20 Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 20 = Total Cover FACU species 120 x 4 = 480 Herb tratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: 120 (A) 480 (S) 2. Rubus spectabilis 40 Yes FAC 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4.0 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 60 = Total Cover j1pody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover rop'etation% FHyd— Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 ent? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks: F. excelsior (European ash) is not listed in the US, but is considered a wetland tree in its home territory US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DF-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color [moisl� % Redox Features 901ar 4maistI _ % Type' Loc2 Texture R masks 0-1 Duff 1-16 10YR 2/2 100 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De Ietion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer {if present): � Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ElNo ED Remarks: Soil appears to have been disturbed at some point. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re uired. check all that appiy1 Secondary Indicators 2 or more re uired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery f C9 ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): , Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 9 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Remarks: Record rainfall in recent Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: We erhaeEiser City/County: Federal WayiKing Sampling Date*6/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DF-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave depressiop) Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308059 Long:-122.297303 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 mcent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No El within a Wetland? Yes ® No El Remarks: Soils disturbed at some point many years ago. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover SSpeecies? Status 1. Fraxinus excelsior 30 Yes NL 2. Populus balsamifera 50 Yes FAC 3. 4. Sa iin (Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Spiraea douglasE 2. Rubus spectabilis 3. 4. 5. Herb $tE.@tum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Carex obnupfa 2. Carex deweyena 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. WoodY Vine Strat m (Plot size: 15ft) 1. !None 2. 80 = Total Cover 20 Yes FACW 20 Yes FAC 40 = Total Cover 10 Yes OBL 10 Yes FAC 20 = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: _ OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 80 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Fraxinus excelsior (European ash) is considered to be a wetland plant in Europe We can safely assume this test plot represents hydrophytic vegetation. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DF-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist] % Redox Features Color moist % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-9 10YR 2/1 10_0 Muck 9-16 10YR 6/4 100 Silt sand 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ® Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): I Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one_re uired7 check all that a t econda Indicators Q or more re aired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113) 4A, and 413)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery [(;9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 3 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes ca ilia fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WavlKino _ Sampling Date:418116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Cam us LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DG -UPL Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex _ _ Slope (%): 3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308021 Long:-122.297457 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood qraveJIV sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ED Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ED Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Thuja plicata 2. Acer macrophyllum 3. Pseudotsuga menziesd 4. Sa Iin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus armeniacus 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Rubus ursinus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Straturn (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 80 Remarks: sampling point locations, transects, Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ED etc. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover 5 ties? Status Number of Dominant Species 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 40 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant 30 Yes FACU Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) 30 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 30 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 20 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DG-UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches)— Color (moist) % Color (moist) _ % Tvoe, Loe Texture _ Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-9 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam 9.16 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy Loam gravelly 'Type- C=Concentration, D=De lesion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Locafion: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: No hydric soil indicators HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Secondary Indicators (2 or more reQuired ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (133) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: No wetland hyrology indicators identified US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/KingWay/King Sampling Date:418116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DG-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section if T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till Dlain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308021 Long:-122.297457 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sa piing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Wetlands located within disturbed woods near wetlands DE and DF VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Siratom (Plot size: 30ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Carex deweyana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: 24 Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 0 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 30 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 30 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = 15 Y FAC Column Totals: (A) (B) 15 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 85 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 I __j SOIL Sampling Point: DG-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist)_ % Redox Features Color [moist] % Type' Lace Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-11 1 QYR 2/1 100 Muck 11-16 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Silt prominent feature 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letian, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location. PL=Pore Linfn , M=Matrx. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No El Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators {minimum of one required; check all that a of ❑ Surface Water (Al) ® High Water Table (A2) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): 9 Secondary Indicators-(2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (133) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections). ii available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: We erhaeu r City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date:4!8116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DH UPL 1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Gla ial till plain_ Local relief (concave, convex, none): gentle slope Slope (%): 3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.307786 Long:-122.297435 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Aldenvood gravelly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slo es NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % over Species? Status 1. Thuja plicata 30 Yes FAC 2. Acermacrophyllum 40 Yes FACU 3. Psuedotsuga menziesii 30 Yes FACU 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus armeniacus 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Rubus ursinus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Sir atom (Plot size: 15ft) 1 2 100 = Total Cover 30 Yes FAC 30 = Total Cover 20 Yes FACU Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multioly by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = ❑ Dominance Testis >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 20 = Total Cover ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 80 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ❑ No E US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DH UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color Imoist) % Redox Features Color (moist) Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-9 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam 9-16 10YR 3/3 100 5andv loam gravelly 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains, 21-ocation: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re ired check all that a :I Secondary Indicators (2 or more r ouired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/Kind Sampling Date:4/8/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal. Way Campus. LLC _ State: WA Sampling Point: DH-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tyeten _ Section, Township, Range: Septlon 1-6 T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.307786 Long:-122.297435 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation no, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) ouiviwimmi yr rrrvunvua — Aivacn site Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sa lin !Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Carex deweyana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. mt locate Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ etc. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Io Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 0 = Total Cover 30 Y FAC 30 = Total Cover 15 Y FAC 15 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 85 % Cover of Biotic Crust Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total °I Cover of: _Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DH-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Fea ures [inches] Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TypeLac' Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-11 10YR 2/1 100 Muck 11-16 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (All) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (All0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary, Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 9 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Remarks: Secondary Indicators 2 or more re ulred ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WayNing Sampling Date:d18116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Caws LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DI UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): gentle slope Slope (%): 3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 43.307767 Long:-122.297341 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Ald_erwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site Wrap showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ED Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Thuja plicata 30 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Acer macrophyllum 40 Yes FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Psuedotsuga menziesii 30 Yes FACU Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus armeniacus 30 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 30 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Rubus ursinus 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 20 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1, 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 80-litter % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DI-UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color moi % Redox Features Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-9 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam_ 9-16 10YR 3/3 100 Sandy loam gravelly 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, NIMatrix, Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ElNo Remarks: No hydric soil indicators HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or mare re Hired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No wetland hydrology indicators identified US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Eederal WaylKinn Sampling Date: 418?16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DI-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21-N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 43.30776Z Long: •122.297341 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 l2ercent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling oint locations, transepts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Carex deweyana 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: °/° Cover 5nerJe_s? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) f Percent of Dominant Species 0 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 30 Y FAC 30 = Total Cover 15 Y FAC 15 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 85 % Cover of Biotic Crust Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Caver of: Multiply by OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 13.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DI-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-11 10YR 2/1 100 Muck 11-16 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 4/6 10 C M Silt 'Type: C=ConcentraOon, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocaLioni PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary indicators 2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 9 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspect(ons), if available Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/Kinq Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DJ-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: S ction 16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.307429 Long:-122,297907 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) auiynyimni ur rimuiN"a — miiacn site map SnoWinq sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Soils graded at somepoint in the past VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Abies grandis 2. Fraxinus excelsior 3. Acer macrophyllum 4. Sa Iln /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Oemleria ceraslformis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Srraiurn (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum 2. Dicentra formosa 3. Rubus ursinus 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody V,WStratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 40 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 40 Yes NL Total Number of Dominant 20 Yes FACU Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A/B) 20 Yes FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: MUltiDly by: _ OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 20 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = 20 Yes FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 30 Yes FACU 20 Yes FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 70 = Total Cover ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: F. excelsior (European ash) is not listed in the US, but it is recognized as a wetland tree in its home territory. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DJ-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist] 0/6Color Redox Features (moist)_ _ % TWe, Lac' Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 313 100 Gravel) o m 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: No hydric soil indicators HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators minimum of one reQuiredo check al! that a . Iv Second ry Indicators f 2 or more rpq ulred ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery ((.9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED includes ca ilfa fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No wetland hydrology indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal NylKing Sampling Date:4/6/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: DJ-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain - Local relief (concave, convex, none): eoncave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.307429 Long:-122.297907 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology NO naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map s Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. sampling point locations, transects, im Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ etc. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Slralum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Populus balsamifera 50 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Fraxinus excelsior 50 Yes NL Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5aplinol5hrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B) 1. None Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Tolal %Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 0 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Carex deweyana 10 Yes FAC Column Totals: _ (A) (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ® Dominance Testis >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 10 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2, be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 90 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: F. excelsior (European ash) is recognized as a we0and tree in its home territory. It is not listed in the US US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast- Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: DJ-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color m % Color (moist) % Type, LocZ Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/2 100 Mucky loam 8-12 10YR 2/1 100 Mucky loam_ 12-16 10YR 612 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M Gravel sand Redox features prominent 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix, Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (All0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ® Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (minimum of one reguired:_check all that aoplv) ❑ Surface Water (All) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (611) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 5 Secondary Indicators (2 or more re wired ® Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (Cg ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weverhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/Kinq Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Cam us LLC State: WA Sampling Point: El-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): CWgAl till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None . Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309559 Long:-122.298034 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) ,UMMAKT Ur NNUINUb — Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ED Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii_ 2. 3. 4. Saplingd5hrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Sambucus racemosa 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum_ 2. Rubus ursinus 3. Galium aParine 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2, Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 90 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) 90 = Total Cover 15 Y FACU 15 = Total Cover 15 Y FACU 30 Y FACU 20 Y FACU 65 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0- moss % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ED US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EI-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix (inches) Color (moist) % Redox Features Color (moist) % Two' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-4 10YR 2/2 100 loam aravellv 4-16 10YR 413 100 loam gravelly 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes [INo Remarks: No hyrics soil indicators HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secooda Indicators 2 or myrequired) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes ca illa fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: No wetland hydrology indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wa• ,'King _ Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: EI-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21 N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Qlactal till plain _ Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309559 Long:-122.298034 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent.slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) DUMMA cT Ur r1NUiNcas — Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stra[Llm (Plot size: 30ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Stellaria crisps 2. Carex deweyana 3. Claytonia sibirica 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 0 = Total Cover 30 Y FAC 30 = Total Cover 30 Y FAC 15 Y FAC 20 Y FAC 65 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0-moss % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: MUItiDly bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: E Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: El-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 2/1 100 Loam 10-16 10YR 5/1 s0 10YR 4/6 10 C M silt Gravelly, rominent feature 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ' 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (178) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re uired check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations Secondary Indicators (2 or mare required ❑ Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: W"whaeusor _ City/County: Federal Way/Kino Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: EJ-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial IN plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309238 Long:-122.297874 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Aldenvood gravelly _sandy_loam,_0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Fraxinus excelsior 30 Y NIL That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Pseudotsuga menziesii 30 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3. Thuja plicata 20 Y FAC Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 80 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28.6 (A/B) 5aplinal5hrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Oemleria cerasiformis 15 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus spectabilis 25 Y FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 40 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herh Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 20 Y FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Rubus ursinus 15 Y FACU 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 35 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 65 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Fraxinus excelsior (European ash) is not listed in the US, but is recognized as a wetland tree in its home territory US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EJ-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color moist % Color moist) % Type'_ —Loc.'. Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 3/3 100 Loam 8-16 10YR 3/4 100 Siity loam 'T e: C=C once ntration, D=De tetion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soiis3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ElNo ED Remarks: No hydric soil indicators observed HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicate (minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondn Indicators 2 or more re uired ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: No wetland hydrology indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/KingWay/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: EJ-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain _ Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309238 Long:-122.297874 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood aravefly sandy loam 0 to 8 perepnj slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sa piing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tr a Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Fraxinus latifolia 2. 3. 4. Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine, tratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover . Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 40 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 40 = Total Cover 35 Y FAC 35 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of., MultiDly by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation IndIcat"- ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EJ-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color mois % Color {moist] % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0-2 Duff 2-6 10YR 3/2 100 Mut�oam 6-10 Duff. roots. and wood 10-16 10YR 6/1 100 Sarldv silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ® Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required; check all that apply) Se co ndary Indicators 2 or m ore reci uireyl ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 6 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC — State: WA Sampling Point: EK-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glarjal till olpin Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309099 Long:-122.297926 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ElNo ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ED Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Pseudotsuga menziesii 20 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Thuja plicata 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. Fraxinus excelsior 35 Y NL Species Across All Strata: 8 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 70 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5 (A/B) 1. Oemleria cerasiformis 15 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus spectabilis 5 N FAC Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. Acer circinatum 10 Y FAC OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 30 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herh Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 20 Y FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Rubus ursinus 10 Y FACU 3. Rubus armeniacus 10 Y FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 40 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Fraxinus excelsior (European ash) is considered a wetland tree in Europe. Not listed in US US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EK-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-3 10YR 313 100 Loam 3-7 10YR 6/3 90 10YR 5/8 10 C M Silt Prominent feature 7-16 10YR 3/3 100 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix, Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: It appears soils were disturbed from 3-7, having come from Wetland EK. No hydric soil indicators identified HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that amly) Secondary Indicators (2 or more _re ulred ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: No wetland hydology indicators US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wayli{ing Sampling DateA/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Wav Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: EK-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N._R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial fill 121ain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309099 Long:-122.297926 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loamr 0 to 8-riercent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sa piing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sapling Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Spiraea douglasii 2. Rubus spectabilis 3 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 0 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) 45 Y FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: 25 Y FAC Total % Cover of: MUIt1Dly bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = 70 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: E Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EK-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix inches Color moist % Redox Features Color moist % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-2 Duff 2-11 10YR 3/2 100 Mucky loam 11-16 10YR 5/2 80 5YR 516 20 C M silt gravelly 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM Reduced Matrix. CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Localion: PL=Pore Lin -inn, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (All0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one re uired• check all that apply) $ condo In i tors 2 or more re uire ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, ® Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 7 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/KingWay/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Cam us LC State: WA Sampling Point: EL-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21 N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain _ Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309049 Long:-122.297756 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravefly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) JUMMAKT UI- I-INUINfib — Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) —%---Cover Species? Status 1. Fraxinus excelsior 30 Y NL 2. Pseudotsuga menziesii 30 Y FACU 3. Thuja plicata 20 Y FAC 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Oem/eria cerasiformis 2. Rubus spectabilis 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum 2. Rubus ursinus 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 80 = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28.6 (A/B) 15 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 25 Y FAC Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 40 = Total Cover 20 Y FACU 15 Y FACU 8. 35 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 65 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: F. excelsior (European ash) is not listed in the US, but is considered a wetland tree OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EL-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color m lst % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 3/3 100 Loam 8-16 10YR 3/4 100 Silly lopm 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks: No hydric soil indicators identified HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos. previous inspections), if available: hydrology present US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weverhauser City/County: Federal VVav!Kin-q Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus- LLC State: WA Sampling Point: EL-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N,_R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till nlain Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309049 Long:-122.297756 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Fraxinus latifolia 2. 3. 4. Sapiino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: % CoverSpecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 40 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 40 = Total Cover 35 Y FAC 35 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: E Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EL-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redo Features inches Color moist % Color (moist)_ % Tvice, Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-2 Duff 2-6 10YR 3/2 100 Mucky loam 6-10 Duff, roots and wood 10-16 10YR 6/1 100 5andv silt 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer {if present]: Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators - Primary Indicators Iminimum of one re uirede ch all that a I Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (611) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 6 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: We erha user City/County: Federal Wav/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Cam us LLC State: WA Sampling Point: EM-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat:-47-308991 Long:-122.298042 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 14 Gover SDecies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Pseudotsuga menziesil 20 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Thuja plicata 15 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3. Fraxinus excelsior 35 Y NL Species Across All Strata: 8 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 70 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 37.5 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Oemleria ceraslformis 15 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Rubus spectabilis 5 N FAC Total % Cover of: MUItiDly bv: 3. Acer circinatum 10 Y FAC OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 30 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 20 Y FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Rubus ursinus 10 Y FACU 3. Rubus armeniacus 10 Y FAC Prevalence Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 40 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Nene 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: Fraxinus excelsior (European ash) is not listed in the US, but is recognized as a wetland tree in its home territory US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EM-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % color moist % Type' Log' Texture Remarks 0-1 Duff 1-3 10YR 3/3 100 Loam 3-7 10YR 6/3 g0 10YR 5/8 10 Silt Prominent feature 7-16 10YR 3/3 100 'Type-. C=Concentration. D=De letiort, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): r Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: It appears soils were disturbed from 3-7", having come from wetland EK.No hydric soil indicators observed. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary_Indicators minimum of one reaired- the k all that apply) • econdary Indicators (2 or more regpired) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe} Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available Remarks: No wetland hydrology indicators were oberved US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way-aKinq Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: EM-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308991 Long:-122.298042 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: AlderwoodgraypIly sandy loam 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Spiraea douglasii 2. Rubus spectabilis 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. NOri8 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 0 = Total Cover 45 Y FACW 25 Y FAC 70 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is _<3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: EM-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features inches Color (moist) % Color (moist) _ % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-2 Duff 2-11 10YR 3/2 100 Mucky loam ] 1-16 10YR 5/2 80 5YR 5/6 20 C M sill gravelly, T pe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, GS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 7 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (.stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, Remarks: Secondary Indicators 2 or more re uired ® Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/King _ Sampling Date:4116116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC _ State: WA Sampling Point: FA-UPI1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Till Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%): 10 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.310939 Long:-122.291696 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showinoi samnlina point locations_ transer:ts. imnortant features_ etc_ Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ED Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No ED Wetand Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Record rainfall in recent months. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Alnus rubra 2. 3. 4. SaolimolShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Cytisus scoparius 2. Rubus armeniacus 3. 4 5. herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Rubus ursinus 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: °! Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 40 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 40 = Total Cover 60 Y NIL 20 Y FAC 80 = Total Cover 60 Y FACU 60 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species 60 x 3 = 180 FACU species 60 x 4 = 240 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 120 (A) 420 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.5 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: FA-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (molst) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 4/2 100 Gravel loam 4-16 10YR 5/2 100 Gravel loam 'T pe: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location! PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one reouired: check all that aooly) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Secondary Indicators 2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available. Record rainfall in recent US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/King Sampling Date:4/16116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: FA-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section T21 N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Till Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.310939 Long:-122.293696 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name:.4lderw_ood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) aummAKY ur rllvuiNub — Atiacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. A/nus rubra 2. 3. 4. SaplinalShrub Stralum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. A/opecurus sp. 2. Epilobium ciliatum ssp. watsonii 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 30 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 30 = Total Cover 60 Y FAC 60 = Total Cover 30 Y FAC 2 N FACW 32 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 68 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: FA-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color Ni oi st) % Color (rnoist) % Type Loc ` Texture Remarks Q-1 Litter 1-3 10YR 2/2 100 Sandy loam 3-18 10YR 6/1 100 Sand Io m 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Linin . M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sotls3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ® Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary,Indicators minimum of one re uireds check all that apply) ® Surface Water (All) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ® Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ® Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 6 Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Secondary Indicat4+ (2 or more reguired) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/King Sampling Date:4/16116 Applicant/Owner: Federal WaV_QaM_pVs,LLC State: WA Sampling Point: FB-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Till Plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 15 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.310897 Long:-122.290114 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ED Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Qover SVe_cies? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Tsuga heterophylla 70 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Alnus rubra 30 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 60 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2, Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 60 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Straturn (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 30 Y FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Pteridium aquilinum 10 Y FACU 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 40 = Total Cover Wa Ay Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: F8-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Locz Texture Remarks 0-7 10YR 2/2 100 Duff 7-16 10YR 3/4 100 Gravel sand 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that apply) SOCandary Indicators 2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) 4A, and 413)) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/Kind Sampling DateAirl6116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLQ State: WA Sampling Point: FB-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Till plain - Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.310897 Long:-122.290114 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood -gravelly sandv loam. 0 to 8 Dercent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover s2ecie:s? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Fraxinus latifolia 20 Y FACW That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3• Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 20 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B) SaplinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 5 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: MUltiDly bv: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 5 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 10 Y FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Athyrium filix-femina 5 Y FAC 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ® Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 15 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Nona 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2. 0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 85 % Cover of Biotic Crust Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: FB-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color mois % Color fmoistl % Tvae' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 Duff/litter 4-13 10YR 2/1 100 Gravel muck 13-16 10YR 2/1 100 Muck 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ® Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators Iminimum of one required: check all thatapply) ® Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations Second ary. Indicators 2 or m orereQu ired ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 6 Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal_WaylKhg Sampling DateAMM6 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: FD-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tyeten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21 K R4_E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Road rism in i I till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): west sto a Slope (%): 20 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.310030 Long:-122.292461 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly Undy loam 0 to 8 percent slo es NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology Yes significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) aumm,KmT ur riNwiNL2a — Airacn site map snowing Sampiing point locations, transects, important teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks: At some point decades ago a utility line was buried and a road way was built on top of it VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3011t) 1. Acer macrophyllum 2. Alnus rubra 3. 4. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 60 Y FACU 40 Y FAC 100 = Total Cover SaplinalShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 15 Y FAC 2. 3. 4. 5. 15 = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum 10 N FACU 2. Dicentra formosa 30 Y FACU 3. Rubus ursinus 20 Y FACU 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 60 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 Litter % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multioly by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species 55 x 3 = 165 FACU species 120 x 4 = 480 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 175 (A) 645 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.7 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: FD-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-16 10YR 3/3 100 Gravel loam T pe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (All) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (All0) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (178) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks: Fill for buried utility corridor. HYDROLOGY Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that a ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Secondary Indicators (2 or more required ❑ Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (135) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WaylKlna Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Wav Camous. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: FD-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16 T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): i ] till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concaye — Slope (%): 3 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.310030 Long:-122.292461 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology Yes significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Drainage blocked by utility corridor fill. Soil originally not hydric but changing due to blocked drained and prolonged innundation. VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size:.30ft) 1. Thuja plicata 2. Alnus rubra 3. 4. Sa lin (Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Athyrium filix-femina 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. W0_ody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover _Species? Status 30 Y FAC 10 Y FAC 40 = Total Cover 45 Y FAC 45 = Total Cover 10 Y FAC 10 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 90 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Remarks: Mostly open water Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: a (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: FD-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth MatEjK Redox Fea ur s (jnches) Color (moist) % Color [moist] % Type'Loc2 Texture Remarks 0.1 Rottina leaves 1-7 10YR 3/2 100 Silt loam 7-16 10YR 4/3 90 1 OR 4/8 10 Silt loam Prominent feature 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS -Covered or Coated Sand Grains. location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Strong hydrogen sulfide odor. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Secondary Indicators C2 or more required) red) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (Cg) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/King Sampling Date:4/8/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLG State: WA Sampling Point: FE-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21 N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 4-7 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.310379 Long:-122.296255 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name:.Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) OummruMT yr riNwinua — Axiacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transepts, important teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No E within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No E Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No E Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Acer macrophyllum 2. Populus balsamifera 3. Alnus rubra 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Oemleria cerasiformis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum 2. Rubus ursinus 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8, Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Norte 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 30 Y FACU 30 Y FAC 15 Y FAC 75 = Total Cover 20 Y FACU 20 = Total Cover 25 Y FACU 10 Y FACU 35 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 65 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multlnly by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No E US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: FE-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color of % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks 0.1 Duff 1-16 10YR 3/3 Loam 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indica ors minimum of one required; check all that a I ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Secondary Indicators 2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No rinrhirlPs rnnidary fririaa) Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wayllting Sampling Date:418116 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: FE-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.310379 Long:-122.296255 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name:.Aldenaood gravelly sandy loam- 0 to 8 percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampiing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tfee Slratorn (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Populus balsamifera 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Ranunculus repens 2. Carex deweyana 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 45 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) 45 = Total Cover 60 Y FAC 60 = Total Cover 45 Y FAC 15 Y FAC 60 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 % Cover of Biotic Crust Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is s3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 1 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 Sampling Point: FE-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-13 10YR 2/2 100 mucky loam 13-10 10YR 511 40 10YR 416 60 Sandy silt Prominent feature 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sotls3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ® Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators Iminimurn of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indic tors 2 or mare required) ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (09) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 9 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 1 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes capillary fringe) — Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections). if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Wav/King, Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Carus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: FF-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Road prism in Glacial till plain _ — Local relief (concave, convex, none): wast slope — Slope (%): 20 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309731 Long:-122.292461 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology Yes significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) JummAKT ur riNuuvtaa — ALtacn site Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: At some point decades ago a utility line was bt snows VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? and a road way was built on top of it. Important features, etc. Yes ❑ No Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) I Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Acer macrophyllum 60 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Alnus rubra 40 Y FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 100 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) 5aplincilShrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 15 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 15 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = 1•terb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 10 N FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. Dicentra formosa 30 Y FACU 3. Rubus ursinus 20 Y FACU Prevalence Index = B/A = 4• Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6. ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 7, ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 60 =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2. be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 litter % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 J, `. SOIL Sampling Point: FF-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color moist % Type, Loc2 Texture 0-16 10YR 3/3 100 Gravel loam 'Type: C=Concentration. D=De letion. RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): l Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks: Fill for buried utility corridor HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Secondary Indicators (2 or more re.[tqire_d] ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (133) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WaylKing Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Fgderal Way Ca_Mj)M_LUC_ _ State: WA Sampling Point: FF-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till Dlain Local relief (concave, convex, none): closed depression Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.309731 Long:-122.292461 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes E No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology Yes significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes E No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil Yes, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMAKY Ur I-iNUiNU5 — Attacn site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes E No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes E No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes E No ❑ Remarks: Drainage blocked by utility corridor fill. Soil originally not hydric but changing due to blocked drained and prolonged innundation VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size:.30ft) 1. Alnus rubra 2. 3. 4. SaplinglShrubStratum (Plot size:15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Athyrium filix-femina 2. Polystichum munitum 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Wgodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2, Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 90 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 90 = Total Cover 10 Y FAC 10 = Total Cover 10 Y FAC 10 Y FACU 20 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 0 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Remarks: Mostly open water Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: E Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes E No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: FF-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-1 Rotting leaves 1-7 10YR 3/2 100 Silt loam 7-16 10YR 4/3 90 1 OR 4/8 10 Silt loam Prominent feature 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Strong hydrogen sulfide odor. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required, check all_tha_t apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Sewn Indicators 2 or more r uired ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (137) Water Table Present? Yes 0 No [I Depth (inches): 1 Saturation Present? Yes L•] No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Camous. LLC State: WA Sampling Point: GB-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N, R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308279 Long:-122.298501 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood pravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampiing point locations, transects, important textures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Record rainfall in recent months VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Thuja plicata 30 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Fraxinus excelsior 60 Y NL Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 90 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40 (A/B) Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 20 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of. Multiply by: 1 OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2. = 5. FAC species 50 x 3 = 150 20 = Total Cover FACU species 40 x 4 = 160 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. Polystichum munitum 15 Y FACU Column Totals: 90 (A) 310 (B) 2. Rubus ursinus 25 Y FACU 3 Prevalence Index = B/A = 3_4 4 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 ❑ Dominance Test is >50% 6 ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 7 ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 40 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. 2, Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 litter % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ❑ No ED Remarks US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: GB-UPLI Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 3/4 100 Sand loam 10-16 10YR 3/4 100 Sandy loam With charcoal 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: PrimarV Indicators minimum of one reauired: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Seconds Indicators 2 or more required) ❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 10 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Record rainfall in US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: GB-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Glacial till plain Local relief (concave, convex, none): drainage channel Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.308279 Long:-122.298501 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: AJderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to a percent slopes NW I classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology Yes significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) OUmmAKT Ur 1I1VUINGJ — Arracn site map snowing Sampling point locations, transects, Important teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Soils probably disturbed in past logging probably contributing to topographic - Perhaps skid trail VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. None 2. 3. 4. Sapft§ /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Cornus sericea 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 511t) 1. Phalaris arundinacea 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 0 = Total Cover 15 Y FACW 15 = Total Cover 30 Y FACW 30 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 70 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAG species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: GB-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) — % Type, Locz Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 313 100 Loam 4-16 10YR 5/1 a0 10YR 5/8 20 Silty sand Prominent feature 'Type: Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ® Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (If present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: Soils probably disturbed in past logging probably contributing to topographic - Perhaps skid trail. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413) ® High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (1311) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 6 S econdary Indicators 2 or m 0,re recl uired ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) []Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal WaylKing Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus, LLC State: WA Sampling Point: PG-UPL1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16, T2.1 N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslooe Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 3-5 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.305356 Long:-122.292863 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. 0 to 8 t front slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sa piing point locations, transepts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No M within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 1. Alnus i ubra 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) 1. Polystichum munitum 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 2. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 70 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 70 = Total Cover 40 Y FAC 40 = Total Cover 70 Y FACU 70 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Remarks: Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67 (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: MUltiDly bv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species 110 x 3 = 330 FACU species 70 x 4 = 280 UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: 180 (A) 610 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.39 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ® Dominance Test is >50% ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: PG-UPL1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Locz Texture Remarks 0-9 10YR 3/1 100 SiL 9-13 10YR 4/1 100 No redox 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De tenon, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prima Indicators minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (611) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches) Secondary Indicators f2 or..rnore Mquiredl ® Water Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 46)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (Cg ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Weyerhaeuser City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date:4/9/16 Applicant/Owner: Federal Way Campus. LLC _ State: WA Sampling Point: PG-WET1 Investigator(s): Richard Tveten Section, Township, Range: Section 16. T21N. R4E Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): None Slope (%): 1-2 Subregion (LRR): LRR A Lat: 47.304224 Long:-122.293305 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes NWI classification: None Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation No, Soil No, or Hydrology No naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) ,UMMAKY OF IFINUINUb — Attacn site map snowing Sampling point locations, tfansects, important teatures, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30ft) 2-4-Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. Alnus rubra 25 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) 2. Populus balsamifera 5 N FAC Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 30 = Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B) Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. Rubus spectabilis 80 Y FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species x 1 = 4. FACW species x 2 = 5. FAC species x 3 = 80 = Total Cover FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5ft) UPL species x 5 = 1. None Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. 3. Prevalence Index = B/A = 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. ® Dominance Test is >50% 6• ❑ Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 7. ❑ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8 ❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 0 = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15ft) 1. None 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 2 be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic 0 = Total Cover Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 100 % Cover of Biotic Crust 0 Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: GB-WET1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Tvoe' LocZ Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 3/1 100 Loam 6-8 10YR 4/1 100 SiL 'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑ Histosol (Al) ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1 (except MLRA 1)) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) ® Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8) wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Salt Crust (B11) ® Saturation (A3) ❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) ❑ Water Marks (B1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)(LRR A) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Secondary Indicators (2 or more._ren uired ® Water Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 413)) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Saturation Vis ble on Aerial Imagery (C9 ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6(LRR A) ❑Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth (inches): 6-8 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ includes ca illa fringe) — Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions Report APPENDIX B FEATURE SUMMARY TABLE, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2017 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Appendix B TAL-1572C FEATURE SUMMARY TABLE # Wetland ID Cowardin HGM 2014 DOE Wetland Rating Acreage Square Footage— Standard Buffer (feet), FWRC Ch.19 Category Habitat Score 1 AE PEM Depressional III 4 0.0055 239 60 2 AF PEM Depressional III 4 0.0109 473 60 3 AG PFO Depressional 111 4 0.1486 6,475 60 4 AH PSS Depressional III 4 0.0163 711 60 5 Al PEM Slope IV 3 0.0699 3,044 40 6 AJ PEM Slope IV 3 0.0012 51 40 7 AL PEM Slope IV 3 0.0246 1,072 40 8 AO PEM Slope IV 3 0.0018 79 40 9 AV PFO Depressional 111 4 0.2831 12,332 60 10 BR PEM Depressional lil 5 0.0508 2,211 105 11 BS (N) PFO Depressional III 4 0.0616 2,683 60 12 BS (S) PEM Depressional IV 3 0.0044 192 40 PFO Depressional 11I 3 0.4948 21,554 60 E PFO Depressional Ili 3 0.0019 81 60 PFO Depressional III 3 0.0253 1,103 60 16 DH PFO Depressional III 3 0.0062 271 60 DI PFO Depressional 111 3 0.0052 227 60 F17 DJ PFO Depressional III 3 0.1453 6,331 60 El PFO Depressional IV 3 0.0040 175 40 20 EJ PSS Depressional 111 3 0.0053 231 60 21 EK PSS Depressional III 3 0.0041 179 60 22 EL PSS Depressional Ill 3 0.0121 529 60 23 EM PSS Depressional Ill 3 0.0070 306 60 24 FA PSS Slope IV 4 0.0499 2,174 40 25 FB PSS Depressional III 4 0.2059 8,967 60 26 FD PFO Depressional IV 3 0.0157 686 40 27 FE PFO Depressional 111 5 0.0074 324 105 ** Reflects on -site acreage for wetlands that continue off -site 9/1/2017 2:29 PM TAL-1572C FEATURE SUMMARY TABLE # Wetland ID Cowardin HGM 2014 DOE Wetland Rating Acreage Square Footage" Standard Buffer (feet), FWRC Ch.19 Category Habitat Score 28 FF PSS Depressional IV 3 0.0225 978 40 29 GB (N) PSS Depressional j III I 3 0.0775 3,377 60 30 KID PEM Slope IV 3 0.0407 1.771 40 31 KF PEM Slope IV 3 0.0087 378 40 32 KG PEM Slope IV 3 0.0003 15 40 33 BN (offsite) PFO Depressional II 6 0.9538 41,548 165 34 KB (offsite) PEM Slope IV 3 0.0003 15 40 35 KC (offsite) PEM Slope IV 3 0.0072 314 40 36 KN (offsite) PEM Slope IV 3 0.0156 678 40 WETLANDS WITHIN SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ZONE # Wetland ID Cowardin HGM Acreage Square Footage— Standard Buffer (feet), FWRC Ch.15 37 BD (N) PFO/PSS Depressional 4.3983 191,590 100 38 BK PSS Slope 0.0028 120 0 39 BL PSS Slope 0.0467 2,035 0 40 BE (offsite) PFO Slope 0.0053 231 0 41 BF (offsite) PSS Slope 0.0564 2,455 0 42 PG (BJ) PFO/PSS Slope 0.4075 17,752 100 ** Reflects on -site acreage for wetlands that continue off -site 9/1/2017 2:29 PM Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) APPENDIX C PHOTODOCUMENT Conditions 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Appendix C Federal Way Campus, LLC Conditions Report The following is a compilation of photos taken between December 2015 and May of 2016 by employees of Talasaea Consultants on various site visits. Wetlands delineated on -site were part of a larger effort to document all wetlands found throughout the Federal Way Campus, LLC property in Federal Way (formerly owned by Weyerhaeuser), which explains the irregular wetland labels. Included in this photodocument are photos of typical wetland vegetation, typical coniferous and deciduous upland, and gravel access roads throughout the site. 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 1 l 1 l l l 1 1 1 Federal Way Campus, LLC Typical Herbaceous Wetland (Photo 1) Conditions Report Photo 1. Typical herbaceous wetland — salmonberry, Himalayan blackberry, red alder, reed canarygrass, and creeping buttercup. 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 2 .r �'- ,4�� dry . •T! ill, �i'�iA fr: •y'� ~' •F w ` Slew • �. ' . =, . _ i _ `yam � r. 4 ,i•" :• i �� • . y f' � ti• a '" ... 7! �. � � . is 1' r3 .. _ ." >< y��� •-' �., it - •�-�' �4� �Y: ' �• , .M1� .� ]. � �.. .r � ... : .-r .� � ' � j + t ;;� ; ,s „ it �'• , ti'" ��e r �R r- .� • .,�t yr`". ice..$ Yi � '`'fi F 4. .:i'" - •',�. r •�. -• FF ,. a�, � K-. � . � 'tits. .. .. . .�'":� .s •i �, R•:� . _ .ter .. �:.u: S�u�.. E 5E 90 120 ISO a - NSA _ •"`'�'J�r�.�,�' ,_,:�� may," � ....+' � � � # r}�y.� �..-r��' -• FPS - 'Y b•, _�w� sir• -::�,� �' ..' 9��:c _ywi�?S; �� -� Federal Way Campus, LLC Typical Open Field (Photos 5 — 7) Photo S. Panorama of open field from the east side. 0 Photo 6. Typical emergent wetland vegetation within the open field. Conditions Report 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 5 I Federal Way Campus,. LLC Existing Conditions Report Photo 7. Typical wetland vegetation within open field. 26 January 2017 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. Page 6 Federal Way Campus, LLC Existing Conditions Report Stream Channel (Photos 8 — 9) Photo B. Stream channel looking north from the access road. Photo 9. Stream channel looking south from the access road. 26 January 2017 Copyright© 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 7 Federal Way Campus, LLC Stormwater (Photo 10) LAT: 47.304149 LON: Photo 10. Stormwater pond located on site. -122.298487 Existinq Conditions Report 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 8 Federal Way Campus, LLC Access Roads (Photo 13) Existing Conditions Report Photo 13. Along the access road in the northwest corner of the property, facing south. 26 January 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Photodocument (01-27-2017) Page 11 Tech Center BLA (Parcels G, H, & 1) Existing Conditions 1 APPENDIX D 11 I I I I I I 11 j WETLAND RATING FORMS WITH FIGURES, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, 2017 1 September 2017 Copyright © 2017 Talasaea Consultants, Inc. 1572C Existing Conditions Report (09-1-2017) Appendix D Wetland name or number &W t r /*g RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington /r Name of wetland (or ID #): A-f- IS —]a Date of site visit:! / b Rated by Trained by Ecology?� Yes _No Date of training—jjL5- HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?__Y -� N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 1JT- (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 Category III — Total score =16 -19 Category IV — Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H yM. L H L H L Landscape Potential H L L H L H M ti,L 1 Value M L H L H L TOTAL Score Based on "7 Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL. CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine 1 II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I Il Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H, M, M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L, L 5 = M,M,L 4=M,L,L 3 = L, L, L 1 Wetland name or number,9f.-fit P /,4-fl DEPRESSIONAL AND MATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators than the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to Improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The snit 2 in below the surface or duff la r I is true clay or true organic (use MRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 (] D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent_ plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y2 of area points = 3 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/" of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal oncling or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y. total area of wetland points = 4 r7 Area seasonally ponded is > X total area of wetland points = 2 L Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 4_6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.2. is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 V D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 ` G D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? 1 L Source Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above i Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: �3 or 4 = H 2*, 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 n D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES ,L if there is a TMDL for the basin In which the unit is found)? 9 � I. Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points In the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:)C. 24 = H _1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 5 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number ili/_b t r- lAg DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions ; Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland Is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. OP th of Story a dLiring wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland Is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to -storage in titre watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland Is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above naung yr site rvtentiat a score 15:_12-1b = H _ZY3-11 = M _U-5 = L Record the rating on the first page ) 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 ` I D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = O D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 I Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Mating of Lanascape rotentiat It score Is:_3 = H V 1 or Z = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page 7 D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. Thee knit is in a landscape that has floodin f rablarri Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the hi lest scare of more than one condiriun is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): G Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are In a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why _ points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6,2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above ncwlu WIM rauray un uic jnx puyr Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 6 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number i&/Zt P_ IA* These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0, Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of 1 ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. [{uatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 -uAmergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub•shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) j. i� 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 1 structure: points = 0 }b �._ I f V If the unit has a Forested class, check if. 7 The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see textfor descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 _Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian milfoll, reed conarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 <5species points =0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you hove four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is olf ?y5 high. C None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row - are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 13 Wetland name or number -At/47F It"f- H 1,5. Special habitat features: 3ChKk the hab€tat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood Is exposed) At least Y ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-19 = H _ '-14 = M U20-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon 20-33% of 1 km Polygon 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 3 points = 2 ?. points =1 < 10% of 1 krn Polygon points = 0 112.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polyr>f.m _ points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _4-6 = H _1-3 = M Y(-_< 1= L Record the rating on the first page I H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet atly of the criteria above Mating of Value If score is:-2 = H ff:k 1= M —0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 -L)cunts=o . _J Record the rating on the first page 14 I __j Wetland name or number 14-Flfv- WDFW Priority Habitats I'dorily Iiahi tat"; Iisted by�L•'W (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008, Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. Irtrit:l/tv�lftv.rtir:t.Pov/ls alt �rt'rr tril r [,r ►.r r" ytlt] l [�5� Il' or access the list from here: Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiverslty Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: d- T ,w *t tq'CjjsS;I�� -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least a trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) a 32 in (81 cm) dbh or a 200 years of age. Mature f - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak ion 11nnent is important (full description~ in IVDFW PITS report p.1S8 -see weir linkabove). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systt:Itts with riuwiug ,water tl+at Contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of a 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are;- 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m)long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 15 Wetland name or number_&2 RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID � T r,+/- f S72- Date of site visit: 1 S /ir., Rated by 1 j/��(�jey Trained by Ecology?_ Yes No Date of trainingT HGM Class used for rating-VJX)ZVJ47 b1laj Wetland has multiple HGM classes?.X_Y,, N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL, WETLAND CATEGORY JL- (l�.�ss c! r�{z fig:�r,tin��ti � ❑r si�erial GhdratteriSUCs_^j 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I -Total score = 23 - 27 Category 11- Total score = 20 - 22 _ ._Category III - Total score =16 -19 Category IV - Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quallty Circle the appropriate ratings iite Potential H L H L I H� andscape Potential H i. H H Value M L H } L TOTAL 17 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Estuarine CATEGORY I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest [ Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II I II In IV �_ Interdunal None of the above Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is flut important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5=M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number DEPRESSIONAL AND FIATS WETLANDS 1 Water -Quality Functlons - Indicators that the `site functions to improve water quality 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water outflows frcm the wetland: 1 Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet, f points = 2 I Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points w 1 Wetland isa.flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points= 1 D 1, 2. The sail 2 In below the surface (or dvlf layer} is true clay or true organic (use MRCS definitions) -Yes - 4 No - 0 p 1 f D 1.3. GharacteriS3r s_gid disir1butiun of ersrstgrstjijLieat4 (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 ') Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/ro of area points = 0 D 1.4. Cl1aractMfisries u[ seasonal panslin • or inundation: This is the area that Is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. j Area seasonally ponded is > h total area of wetland points = 4 1 Area seasonally ponded is > Y. total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < �/, total area of wetland points = 0 } Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above (�( Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H Z6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page f ) 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? !I D 2.1, Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No - 0 r D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland inland uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 U D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 2S0 ft of the wetland? Yes = I No = 0 h D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? �r Source Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: ^3 or 4 = H 1 or 2 = M - _6_0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that Is on the O 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 J JD 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? _ Yes = 2 No = 0 I Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above �7 Rating of Value If score is:_X2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page _j i Wetland Hating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 5 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 20 LS 1 Wetland name or number D_EPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrdlogic Functions - Indicatois that the site fund -ions to reduce flooding and stream degradation 4.0, Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland Is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2 Depih of storage durirn; wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to c 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to c 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 0 43. Cpn_ ribution of the Overland to storagein the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area ofthe wetland unit itself. The area ofthe basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points =5 -� The area ofthe basln is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 - The area ofthe basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating cf Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11 = M �0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page '1 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? � 5.1, Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runotf? Yes = 1 Nc = 0 d D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H _ y 1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit ism a Inndscave that has flooding problem . Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choosy the highest score i more Chun_ me conditivrr is Hier. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e_g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 ' Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why _ points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above f ating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H { -1 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page I Wetland naive or number AL These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide irrlportant habitat 1 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1 Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class Check the Cowardin plant classes In the wetland, Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of '4 ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _Emergent 3 strucrures: points = 2 ---- .1—Scrub-shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure; points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperlods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland- The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present, points = 2 _Occasionally hooded or Inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points 13. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do nothave to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple foosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species pal nts.= 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. if you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points cl! (4 Wetland Rating System for Western WA, 2014 Update .JJ Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 J 13 Wetland name or number H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland, The number of checks is the number of points. �Laege, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 In) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least ; ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H ._7-14 = M 0.6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: %undisturbed habitat_ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_= % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/, (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33 % of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 r` < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 3 2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon aroun�i the wetland. `La caicular__- % undisturbed habitat + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % Undisturbed habitat> 50% of Polygon points =3 Undisturbed habitat 10 50% and In 1-3 patches points = 2 f Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points =0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 krn Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) Z. <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the punts in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is-, 4-6 = H 1-3 = M r< 1 = L Record the rating on the first page j H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 -Site does not meet any of the r iterid above _ .sting of Value If score Is:_2 = li 1 = M ; o = L laint5 = 0 Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number it v WDi=W Priority Habitats L'C!�11J!lllilllh li�.liii!:ihk4�_'LI11. (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. Igt4LI., twll4v_.►va,���J it'll] bAi 11ii+ NA1I3 16ivydU kl 14-S.Lull or access the list from here: Ity i+ L, lydlna-urat a-ratis vlliiL ist/) Counr how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) ofthe wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of Jtabitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in VVDFW PHS report). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growih/Mature forests: Llj3jsL►v I►r t isy,;ul� rra.t -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a mule- layered canopy with occasional small Openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) ;- 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 j years ofage. Mature €orests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags. and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. i — Oregon White Oak: Woodiand stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is impnrrant(ffif descriptions in YVDFW PHS reportp. 158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systerns with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in RVDFW PHS reportp. 161 -see web link above). - — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and jj Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, J� ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 2S ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. 1 — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2 0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: 'Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are � 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long - Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in'this list because they are addressed Isewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 15 Wetland name or number A-T RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington r ' Name of wetland (or ID #): I� 7 Date of site visit: `� Rated by Trained by Ecology?,kyes ❑ No Date of training �b HGM Class used for rating fie, Wetland has multiple HGM classes? ❑ Yes)No NOTE: Form is not complete with out the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 1 " (based on functions or special characteristics ❑) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 Category If - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 -19 19L Category IV - Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Water Quality Hydrologic Habitat List appropriate rating {H, M, Q Site Potential L, Landscape Potential (� Value U_ l/ Total Score Based on Ratings Iq 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Category Estuarine Wetland of High Conservation Value Bog Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon Interdunal None of the above Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9=H,H,H 8=H,H,M 7=H,H,L 7=H.M,M 6=H,M,L 6=M,M,M 5 = H, L, L 5=M,M.L 4=M,L,L 3 = L, L, L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number AT SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions:- Indicatbrs that the site functions to improve.water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1% slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1 % or less points = bl Slope is > 1 % - 2% points = 2 2 Slope is > 2% - 5% points = 1 J Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface (or duff layer) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants >'/ of area �e�a VND it�points = 3 Dense, woody, plants >'/2 of area points = 2 U Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points =1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes abovel 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is: ❑ 12 = H ❑6 -11 = M 0 - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 S 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2A? _ Other SourcesUk."A a5� Yes = 1 No = 0 dotal for S 2 Add the points in the boxes abovel Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: [P - 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list. Yes = 1 No = 0 I S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in !� which the unit is found? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Value If score is: �x 2 - 4 = H ❑ 1 = M ❑ 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number &-r- SLOPE WETLANDS Hydroipgic:lrgnctivris - lndicators:thatthe`site.t?urlct16'.4 to;reduce�hoaiiingird"strearn-erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants Should be thick enough (usually > 118 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points = 1 All other conditions paints = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is: ❑1 = M = L Record the rating on the first Pace S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 rating or Lanascape votentiai It score is: LJ1 = M PO = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Z Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: 182 - 4 = H ❑ 1 = M ❑ 0 = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: 11 J I / t6t aL.� �+Oe a Shor7- $69mi cX�a 61� Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 7 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number AT I These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM.classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS '- Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat, H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. ❑ Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 g Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 , n ❑ Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points -1 U ❑ Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: ❑ The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested pol qon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods ). Fj Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 021Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 I Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 [_.'Saturated only 1 types present: points = 0 ` ❑ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland ❑ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland ❑ Lake Fringe wetland 2 points ❑ Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle ` If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 f 5 -19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1. 1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. �Qy None = 0 points Low = 1 oint Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3 points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number A_'T_ 2 H 1.5. Special habitat features: , J Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. ❑ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long) ❑ Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland ❑ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) ❑ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) ❑ At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If Score is: ❑ 15 - 18 = H ❑ 7 -14 = M J@0 - 6 = L Retard the rating on the Xrsl page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site? H 2.1 Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: undisturbed habitat + ( *�59J % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) _ If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20 - 33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10 - 19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10 % of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland Calculate: % undisturbed habitat + ( %moderate &low intensity land uses 12 _ Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 J + Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (-2) y� <_ 50% of 1 km P lygon is high i ensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes abovel 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If Score is: ❑ 4 - 6 = H ❑ 1 - 3 = M �5 1 = L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies'? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 ❑ It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) ❑ It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant T or animal on the state or federal lists) ❑ It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species ❑ It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources O It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) with in 100m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above Doints = 0 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 10 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number AT WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00165/wdfwOO165.pdf or access the list from here: htty.//wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/phs/list/ Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. ❑ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). ❑ Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). ❑ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. ❑ Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-ctrowth west of Cascade crest — Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests — Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. ❑ Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 — see web link above). ❑ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. ❑ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161— see web link above). ❑ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. ❑ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report — see web link on previous page). ❑ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human ❑ Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation, ❑ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. ❑ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 12 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number -A 4 J � A-0 RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): �►J�f}L /,+D Date of site visit: rT Rated by �-,4/ Trained by Ecology? Yes No Date of training HGM Class used for rating S D . ,., Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined)_ Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY _V' (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category 1- Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 - 19 _Category IV -Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Water Quality Hydrologic Habitat Circle the appropriate ratings .site Potential H M L H M H M L (Landscape Potential H & L H M H M Value M L H L H M TOTAL Score Based on Ratings G., l 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7=H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L, L, L Wetland name or number -AV.4 L / 4-b HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it 1 is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. (N O go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats Jl�'your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). 1( - go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water Flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetf1ow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO-goto5 Qq- The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A v-tL-1A-0 NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number A-J/4 L /A-u SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1% slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 =1 ,3 Slope is > 2%-5% points Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff laver) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS defini[ians): Yes = 3 No = 0 S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > %. of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > %: of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > X of area points =1 v Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above 5 Rating of Site Potential If score is:—_32 = H _6-11= M _i 0-S = L Record the rating on the first page Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: Y 1-2 = M _0 = L Hecora me raring on me jnsE parr Rating of Value If score is:.�2-4 = H _3 = M ^0 = L Record the rating on rnerrrsr page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 11 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number L SLOPE WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually >'/8 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. D Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1= M _Z_0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess D surface runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1= M Y 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points =1 J No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? f7 Yes=2 No=O Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H X1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 I 11 I I I I I I Wetland name or number -A-Tl't L /"qv These questions apply to wetlands of all HGIM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y, ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see textfor descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points (� H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoll, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 �) <5 species points =0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 13 Wetland name or number fA2 1,140 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M � 0.6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 f 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 _ H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) — <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above r) Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M �\ < 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any ofthe _criteria above Rating of Value If score i5:-2 = H _1= M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 points = 0 1 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number��%1 Ll WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WD (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. It w.w v s w or access the list from here: 1 -v st ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independentof the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -growth west of Cascade_crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age.'Mature ton:sts - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number .4 V RATING SUMMARY -- Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): A V Date of site visit: I / S f I b Rated by J - M.G1*4z-y 9-P- Trained by Ecology? 1' Yes No Date of training 4 /1 HGM Class used for rating _P r - 7 0Yiu./' Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y V N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAN D CATEGORY lL (based on functions X or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I — Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III — Total score =16 -19 Category IV —Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION I Improving I Hydrologic I Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings ,ite Potential H iM, L H ',, L H M andscape Potential H 6V L H LM; L H M (C� Value Lf� M L H L H M) L TOTAL core Based on latings - ¢ (7 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above x Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L 1 Wetland name or number Av HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? TO - go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe ffyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. &- go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use theform for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; _At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). lP- go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. Q- go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number AV - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 4 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number DEPRESS[ONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff laverlaverl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions).Yes = 4 No = 0 O D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of pkmiatent Plant5 (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Yz of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characterist€cs of seasonal pondinp or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Yz total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < / total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H Y6-11= M 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 or 4 = H k 1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the U 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 1 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: x 2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 5 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 14V DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 30 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of site Potential it score is:_12-16 = H f 6.11 = M 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above z Rating of Landscape Potential It score is:_3 = H x 1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6-0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding roblems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score i(mare than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): o Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O v Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H )' 1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form —Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y, ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 + If the unit has a Forested class, check if: The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 k Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 _Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points I - All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 201S Wetland name or number A V 3 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. X Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) X At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are 3 permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) X Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_-15-18 = H _7-14 = M x 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]—= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) —2 <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above U Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-4-6 = H _3-3 = M _< 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? 1 H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — it provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria abc Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H "- 1 = M 0=L _ points = 0 [ Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number /� V WDFW Priority Habitats (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008, Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. .w w or access the list from here: ti w.w ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: w - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Matureffowlg -Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover maybe less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions fn WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 1p RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): (U1 D-flal hd Date of site visit: LZLS/( �, Rated by—. ) j/y1&9�}2.{k117— Trained by Ecology?kyes No Date of training--Itj�r HGM Class used for rating I KRJ44 WA) Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y � N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 _Category III —Total score =16 -19 %\_Category IV — Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings ,site Potential H M L H M L H M L ILandscape Potential H (LA)-- H M L H M L Value M L H L H M TOTAL Score Based on Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H, H, L 7=H,M,M 6 = H, M, L 6 = M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4=M,L,L 3 = L, L, L i Wetland name or number _&f?' DEPRESS10NAL AND FIATS WETLANDS Water .Quality.Functions - indicators that the site functions to improve water quality J 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: ` Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). i points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. 2 points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff layer is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of versistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/io of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal poncling or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y2 total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > X total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < / total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 (� D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are they ther ources of p Ilutant comin into the wetland that are n lis ed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source lLUGt yjg3c LtJ�-f I Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 U Add Ne points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 or 4 = H L-P or 2 = M �9 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-42-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number K DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that.the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation J 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 /� 1/ Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 _ Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _6-11 = M X�,_0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page ') 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 Q D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 U Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above U Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H T1 or 2 = M X0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the hic7hest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 4 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 I Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? v Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 sting of Value If score is:_2-4 = H Y\-1 = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page A Wetland name or number 1J R These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of N oc or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 ' Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20%within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 XSeasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points rol 1 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle d If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. CO(:D (:0:) (*) None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 1. Wetland name or number � [N H 1.5, Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 fit (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y. ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of stroto) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above I '/. Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M _,� 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 I 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 t 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon _ _ _ points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon paints = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) _ 2 _< 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H '1-3 = M < 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of .ating of Value If score is: _2 = H Z` = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 ints = 0 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number 13F, WDFW Priority Habitats (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. IlarUw s 05 /wdfW05.affor access the list from here: J��Iwdfw.wa.govlcn�tsPrva�lpl�(a�J}�f i t ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Oki -growth wve l c - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Ma yLfhL s s - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). X Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numbers C.1/'p RATING SUMMARY-- Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): VjeA_M M � L I'��_2 Date of site visit: t I�s Rated by_,cr�/f �P./ Trained by Ecology?Ves No Date of training 1 HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?Y__kN NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III — Total score = 16 -19 _._.______Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality _ Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential =11 L H L I H M L Landscape Potential H (M L H L H ?A L Value J M L I H U L H M (9 ! TOTAL €Score Based on j r„ I + (Ratings (0 ! l 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I I Mature Forest Old Growth Forest 1 Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings ►s not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L 1 Wetland name or number !e>!�; OV-0 o4l DEPRESSIONAL AND.PLATS WETLANDS Water quality Functions. - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality L) 1.0, Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. I points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff laver) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent Ip ants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal pondinig or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > A total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H A6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.3, Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? �l Source Yes = 1 No = 0 V Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above ' Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H -�/-1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 j D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: , 2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 5 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number $S (A/_0 DEPRESSIDNAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions'G'Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and''stream degradation 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 C/ Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet eriods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storaige in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H ./n_6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 O D 5,2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 d Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above F Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = H Y1 or 2 = M ,0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 i Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above ating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H X-'1 = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 0 k Wetland name or number 13S ( A(dM-A These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. 4ABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat . 1 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class, Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 ! Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 4 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 if the unit has a Forested class, check if. _4The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-corer) that each cover 20%within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently Flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 (� Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. 0 None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams r in this row - are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number �'s OV-00-1A H 1.5. Special habitat features: C pk the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cutshrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata] Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M 1( 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page T H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % I Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon pants = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) -- Z <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H X1-3 = M _< 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria a ..ating of Value If score is:_2 = H _1= MY0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 pits = 0 n Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number 'f�,25 C, Aru , ` 1(-I WDFW Priority Habitats Priorily habitats listedWQFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. i w w.w . v > > ' or access the list from here: t wlw.w v s Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (fill descriptions in WDFW PHS report). J — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. i —011-growth/Mature forests: O d r w we -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 1S8 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. 1 — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). J — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. j — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. 1 Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed Jsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number _ S rsa tj fA RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland(or ID #): (?JVu di) 15 Date of site visit: � /u'J Rated by Y M 1 ! ;-jNM Trained by Ecology?X Yes No Date of training 5 /;v HGM Class used for rating�l,,*?,Pa_41 aYm e Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y XN NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY � (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 X Category III — Total score = 16 - 19 'i Category IV — Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Water Quality Hydrologic Habitat I Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H I& L H M L H M (� Landscape Potential H VI L H L H M Value M L H © L H (> L TOTAL Score Based on Ratinoc S I q l 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I [I Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I lI III IV None of the above x Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H, H, L 7 = H, M, M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M, M, M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M, M, L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L, L 1 Wetland name or number -P���t,('f Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington De sessional Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: figure # Cowardin plant classes D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4 Hydroperiods D 1.4, H 1.2 Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods) D 1.1, D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another frgure) D 2.2, D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin D 4.3, D 5.3 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) D 3.1, D 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Map of.• To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes Hydroperiods H 1.1, H 1.4 H 1.2 Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to another figure) R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polVgons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) R 3.1 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes L 1.1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (con be added to anotherf+pure) L 2.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) L 3.1, L 3.2 L 3.3 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) Slope Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant classes H 1.1. H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants 51.3 Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (can be added to figure above) S 4.1 Boundary of 150 ft buffer (can be added to another figu re) S 2.1, S 5.1 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) I S 3.1, S 3.2 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) S 3.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number _-�S (S-D qjf" HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? 0 go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. Pgo to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats ur wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; .At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). VO - go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, _The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. Q- go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine OTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are idled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -go to 7 YE - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe _ Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional _ Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 d Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of stora a durin wet eriods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _6-11= M 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = H X_1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): a Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 o Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 I The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above I Rating of Value If score is: _2-4 = H X_1 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 6 Wetland name or number 6& rsvv_tA, DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff layerlayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions).Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y. of area points = 3 S Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics_ of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded far at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y. total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > X total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < / total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential if score is:_12-16 = H �L6-11 = M 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes =1 No = 0 i Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 or 4 = H �/_1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above r� Rating of Value If score is-.X24 = H _i = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 5 Wetland name or number65 (S_Vq_A) These questions'apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators_ that site functions to provide Itnoortant'habitat _ H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within Lhe Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold ofY ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 oc. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 Q If the unit has a Forested class, check if. The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y. ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 O Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. CC a , ) D (:::*:D(::: None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points Q All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number _[�_S H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) r LJ Total far H 1 — — -- Add the points in the boxes above I IJj Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H —7-14 = M Xi 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) 2 <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M < 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H X1 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number p 5 CSti � WDFW Priority Habitats ELigLity habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. hap- ,1wdR wa.go/public.satmns/DQ 165/wdtw(}01 r S.12dI or access the list from here: ht :11w �v w �' v1;• •v i 71 ]Es �) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: _Q_1(1--row-LITLyestot("-Iscad(_ L rest -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). . Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wedand name or number L44A � CATEGORIZATION BASES] ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0. Estuarine wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? — The dominant water regime is tidal, — Vegetated, and — With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt Yes -Go to SC 1.1 No= Not an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? Cat. Yes = Category I No - Go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2. Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less Cat. I than 10% cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Spartina, see page 25) —At least Y4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. Cat. II —The wetland has at least two of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Yes = Category 1 No = Category II SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) SC 2.1. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of High Conservation Value? Yes - Go to SC 2.2 No - Go to SC 2.3 Cat. I SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? Yes = Category[ No = Not a WHCV SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? htta.//v kNvil.dnr.Na.eov/nho/refdesk/datasearch wrrh wetlands.odf ^ Yes -Contact WNHP/WDNR and go to SC 2.4 No = Not a WHCV SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on their website? Yes = Category I No = Not a WHCV SC 3.0. Bogs Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below. if you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based an its functions. SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons, either peats or mucks, that compose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No - Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks, that are less than 16 in deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on top of a lake or pond? Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No = 1s not a bog SC 3.3. Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? Yes =1s a Category I bog No - Go to SC 3.4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory, you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present, the wetland is a bog. Cat. I SC 3.4. Is an area with peats or mucks forested (> 30% cover) with Sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce, or western white pine, AND any of the species (or combination of species) listed in Table 4 provide more than 30% of the cover under the canopy? Yes = Is a Category I bog No = Is not a bog Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 16 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 6 S (S-0 UA) SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands Does the wetland have at least 1 contipuous acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. — old -growth forests (west of Cascade crest): Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 in (81 cm) or more. — Mature forests (west of the Cascade Crest): Stands where the largest trees are 80- 200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an average diameter (dbh) exceeding 21 in (53 cm). Yes = Category I No = Not a forested wetland for this section Cat. I SC 5.0. Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? — The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks —The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) Cat. l Yes — Go to SC 5.1 No = Not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of aggressive, opportunistic plant species (see list of species on p. 100). Cat. II —At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. —The wetland is larger than 1/10 ac (4350 ft2) Yes = Category I No = Category II SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its habitat functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: — Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103 — Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105 Cat I — Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 Yes — Go to SC 6.1 No = not an interdunal wetland for rating SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form (rates H,H,H or H,H,M Cat. II for the three aspects of function)? Yes = CategoryI No — Go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger? Yes = Category 11 No — Go to SC 6.3 Cat. III SC 6.3. Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac? Yes = Category III No = Category IV Cat. IV Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics If you answered No for all types, enter "Not Applicable" on Summary Form Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 17 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 I I I J j I Wetland name or number 1� f rscLkHj This page left blank intentionally Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 201S 18 Wetland name or number P& RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): WetivtYId D6 _r41-- IG72 Date of site visit: I120 /l,& Rated by 4- M_AW,04 Trained by Ecology? XYes �No Date of training +&- HGM Class used for rating i�P.d.� i2 Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y _A_N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions?x or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 X Category III —Total score = 16 -19 Category IV —Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving 11 I j Hydrologic Habitat Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H L H L H M L Landscape Potential H L H L H M L Value H M L H L H M TOTAL Score Based on Ratings 4 1� 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three rati ngs (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6=M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = LLL 1 Wetland name or number _(�E j DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water. Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality 0 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. /1 l/ points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff la er is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Y. of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/lo of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/lo of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Yz total area of wetland points = 4 2 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above } Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _)(_6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page . 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 Q D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 ( D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes =1 No = 0 6 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above / Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 or 4 = H X1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 O D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 / D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 'f Rating of Value If score is:2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number _PE DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation 0 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Death of storage during wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 �j- Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above g Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H -46-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 15.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 a D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 l D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Z Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:�3 = H -A1 or Z = M —0 = L Record the rating on the prst page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit, points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? I D Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 ;ating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H A I = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System For Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page 0 Wetland name or number PC - HABITAT FUNCTIONS. -- These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. icators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of '4 ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 I Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: X The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon , H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 ,Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points rl 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 <5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (:D (: 0 :) (*) (0 ) 0 None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number PC 2 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of Stroh)) I Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 1 -2, 1 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M �>L0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]—= % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 l 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 / Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 1 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) Z <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Q Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M Z< 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above _ points.=0 Mating of Value If score is: _2 = H _1= M X0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number PC- WDFW Priority Habitats ErionMhab't,9tslIstCLIhXW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. http:J/wdtw.wa, ov,�iublictitio��:,/001( 1ty wll CAS isl[ or access the list from here: htu-)-./Iw,Lib!m,va.gov/conservatiotillihs/listi) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -grows h +vc5L_! ltC711c• c - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are,-- 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 It (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numberb�P6,/,W/P/ RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID REI�Aklp 1-41 1�-72 Date of site visit: 14 Rated by /1 Trained by Ecology? k Yes No Date of training HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?—Y k N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions_/or special characteristics____) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score = 16 -19 Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Water Quality F Habitat I Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H L H L H M i( (Landscape Potential H L H L H M Value H M L H M L H M TOTAL :score Based on (Ratings 7 Jlp 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7=H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L 2/,r-i/)� Wetland name or number PF PH I P 671p l DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to.im—orove water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. 13 points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or dufLLayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes) Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area that is pondedfor at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H ),e__6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 (� D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes = 1 No = 0 O Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H __�/1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 O D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Value If score is:_X2-4 = H _1= M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number -p-r-ItQpttIP1 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions = Iridicators_that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wetperiods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 3 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above to Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H ]4,6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 7 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 (� D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 ' Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above z Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = H Al or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the Just page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the hi hest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? D Yes=2 No=0 Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:�2-4 = H 1 = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number —Pr/P6/ Pff / D I These questlans apply to wetlands of all HGM classes: 4ABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat rl 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y. ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if. The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 1�e'-5easonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points ri 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 <5 species pal nts=0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (: 0 :) (*) ( 0 None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 J rk rr1 Wetland name or number _Df1pC'/D++ /D I H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y. ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structuresforegg-laying by amphibians) X Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of scrota) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M . 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H Z.O. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_ + [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 I 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 4 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 I Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) 2 <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M _!t 1= L i H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H _3 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 U points = 0 ( Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number -af o0 H / PZ WDFW Priority Habitats Priority(see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp.iublicatfntls/Q f-,5wdfW0 165. or access the list from here: w .w -v ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). I — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Qld-growtil West of Cascade- Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age. Nlature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak j component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (fill descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). - Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Lags: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): 1) T Date of site visit: -� 2-& 1 v Rated by 5 - (K4L1100 Ff Trained by Ecology?�k Yes No Date of training `� i HGM Class used for ratinWetland has multiple HGM classes? - Y a N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY ` (based on functions )( or special characteristics_j 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I — Total score = 23 - 27 Category 11— Total score = 20 - 22 X Category III — Total score = 16 -19 Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Wat pr vi g I Hydrologic I Habitat Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H LM I L iN M L 1 H M (1 Landscape Potential H &P L H l L H M Value M L H d` L H M TOTAL Score Based on 7 I 7 3 17 Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above x Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8=H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5 = M, M, L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 l Wetland name or number P7 HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you -� probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? I�- go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. ru- go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). I l@-goto4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), _The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, _The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. 0- go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, _The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 0- 0- go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number D 7 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 3 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface (or duff _la er is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions).Yes = 4 No = 0 D D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent niants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/l0 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal panding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y: total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y< total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H Y 6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 or 4 = H -� 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 0 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES Z if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Value If score is: X 2-4 = H _1= M _O = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form —Effective January 1, 2015 5 Wetland name or number p'1 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during, wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 S The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above / 2- Rating of Site Potential If score is: Y_12-16 = H _6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 U Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above / Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H Y 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): ■ Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=0 U Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H X 1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: { h The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrugs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see textfor descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 ' Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 _Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian mllfail, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 C 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. 0 Q None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams C. in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number OT H 1.5. Special habitat features: ^ j Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) X Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_,_15-18 = H _7-14 = M 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 f Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) - Z 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above (� Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-4-6 = H _,1-3 = IM _< 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site of the criteria above Rating of Value If score is:_2 = H _3 = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 U points = 0 1- Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number Dr WDFW Priority Habitats (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. litt ►v/nublic7tioits/OOI55/w w 03 65.ndf or access the list from here: W w. S ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unitand the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -growth west of CascadeOld—grow- Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age. r f r s - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of Pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number 61 RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): Wj�d6fnd Fj T11 L • [!;1 z - Date of site visit: �9ol f !v Rated by �f � Trained by Ecology?A Yes No Date of training HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?Y N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functionsk or special characteristics^) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score = 16 -19 -Category IV —Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings ,ite Potential H CW L H 6P L H M andscape Potential H M L H M 1� H M Value M L H L H M 19 TOTAL core Based on 3 I4— latings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System For Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5=M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L 22jc1/i�, Wetland name or number 01 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff layerlayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistem. plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 3: of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/jo of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal pondin or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y. total area of wetland points = 4 ¢ 1 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above D Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on me Jirsr page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 (� D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 Q D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? D Source Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Q Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H -_1 or 2 = M )�_0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 O D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 l D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES 2 if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 3 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:�e 2-4 = H �1= M �0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 5 Wetland name or number E l DEPRESSI0NAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions-' Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1, Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 I Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 I Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Death of storage durine wet periods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 2 7 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3, Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. 3 The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential It score is:_iz-16 = Fi -A-6-11 = nn u-.3 = c nCLUIU LIM IUL fly Ulf L IQ I- P.W. ) 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 v D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 O D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 O Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If scare is:_3 = H _i or z = M _,6,u = c rteCUra the ru[rny vn Lac jn3L puyc D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems, Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the hi hestscore if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Rating of Value If score is: _2-4 = H 41 = M —0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Record the rating on the just page 6 Wetland name or number -E-1- These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. UARITAT F1 INCTICINS - indicators that site functions to provide important habitat ,1 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y. ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2 Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y. ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points .i 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 <5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. ( D (:0:) (*) (00 None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 W-1 P] Wetland name or number ET H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cutshrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structuresforegg-laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) ' Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is: 15-18 = H 7-14 = M X 0.6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 I Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) `- Z <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above D Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M< 1= L I H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above _ paints = 0 .ating of Value If score is: _2 = H _1= M '*If 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number WDFW Priority Habitats r habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008, Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. t • v.wa o •s 1 f>a w i v10 E' 65.ncif or access the list from here: Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. — 01d-growth/Mature forests. 01 ,owtl1 west af_Cascod € crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age_ Mature - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — ❑regon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak croak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 -see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound !Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and area 6.5 it (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. !Vote: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in/this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number -FIZ/E 4-`FL-16N RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID r&tM Date of site visit: Rated byTrained by Ecology?_X Yes No Date of training—tylT HGM Class used for rating mioa Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y _X-N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on function or special characteristics,) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I -Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 _Category III -Total score = 16 -19 Category IV -Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings ,ite Potential H L H L H M .andscape Potential H L H L H M L Value M L H L H M TOTAL core Based on �I I tatings I 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interduna) I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H, H, M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H, M, L 6=M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L, L, L 1 I Wetland name or number _�Wer/FL_IEM I J DEPRESSIDNAL AND 1FLATS'WETLANDS Water.quaiity IFurictions - Indicators'tilat the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff layerlayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 Q D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > Yz of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/.o of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Yi total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _X 6-11 = M 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? O Source Yes =1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above i Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H �1 or 2 = M ,0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 I D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES 2 if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Value If score is:X24 = H _1= M _O = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 5 Wetland name or number E,g-/EL/F Nj DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation 0 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 0 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage durinFwet eriods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 3 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to story a in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 2 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 J The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above �p Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _X6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page ) 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 Q D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 I Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Z Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = H Y1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more that: one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points =1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? I D Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 .tating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H X 1 = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page 31 Wetland name or number —Eileie-leUIE M HABITAT These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of '< ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 —�Ocrub-shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygross, purple loosestrlfe, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. 0E) (*) (ffie None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams - in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 C�1 Wetland name or number I1a/el ct4 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree I slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above I 2 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_35-18 = H _7-14 = M J�' 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 I Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) �2 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H ^1-3 = M << 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points= 0 Rating of Value If score is: _Z = H _1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number eS er'/614am WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. l r 4v 4v.w1.e i ' . c 1 z 4V t�' f�4 or access the list from here: h ' �: ti1'w.4v•a ev c i� •v• ' : ihsllistl) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds. Variable size patches of grass and fortis on shallow soils over bedrock. old-growth/Mature forests: - l w .ven - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS reportp. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the Iargest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number -�� RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): M041A I-L , PA TA/_ I i -7L Date of site visit; J / 611 0 Rated by U . 15 ,l 1 Trained by Ecology?,Yes ❑ No Date of training` HGM Class used for rating S l6 P& Wetland has multiple HGM classes? ❑ Yes - No NOTE: Form Is not complete with out the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions or special characteristics ❑ ) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 - 19 Category IV - Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Water Quality Hydrologic Habitat List appropriate rating (H, M, L} Site Potential Landscape Potential Value V Total Score Based on Ratings 5 r3 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Estuarine Category i Wetland of High Conservation Value Bog -- Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon Interdunal None of the above Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9=H,H,H 8=H,H,M 7=H,H,L 7=H,M,M 6=H,M,L 6=M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5=M,M,L 4=M,L,L 3=L, L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Welland name or number F-A SLOPE .WETLANDS Water:Duality Functions :-.Indicators that the site functions to improve .water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1 % slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1 % or less points = 3 Slope is > 1 % - 2% points = 2 2 Slope is > 2% - 5% points = 1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for duff layer) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 J 0_ S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants >'/z of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants >'/ of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area points = 1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 T Add the points in the boxes above r Rating of Site Potential If score is: ❑ 12 = H LJ6 - 11 = M jj0 - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2,0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 S 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2.1? _ Other Sources Total for S 2 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: ❑1 - 2 = M gO = L Yes = 1 No = Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? _ Yes = 1 No = 01 S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list, Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.3_ Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in 2 which the unit is found? Yes = 2 No _= 0 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above ' Rating of Value If score is K2 - 4 = H ❑ 1 = M F 1 0) = L I Record the rating �onJ the first page AJ, fe s �-b D keA ': wO P�j °�� r7o I IJ� � o ve. 1)uj, , hi 11 1.(Tl? T lDu1d -0. 5 fnor acc of d For. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 6 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number rA SLOPE WETLANDS Hydroinglc Functions., Indicators that t1ie. site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually > V. in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. 0 Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points = 1 All other conditions paints = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is: ❑1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page 3 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? 3 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land V Jses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: ❑1 = M 'N" = L Record the rating on the firstpage S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above jr 1 Rating of Value If score is: ❑ 2 - 4 = H X� 1 = M LJ 0 = L NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS Weiland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 7 Record the rating on the first page WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number I A - These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0, Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. ❑ Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 ❑ Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 M Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points - 1 ❑ Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 if the unit has a Forested class, check if: ❑ The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon _ _ H 1.2, Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or %d ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods ). ❑ Permanently fiouded or nuiidoted 4 or more types present: points = 3 9 Seasonally flocd(,� f or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 ❑ Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 ❑ Saturated only 1 types present: points = 0 ❑ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland ❑ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland ❑ Lake Fringe wetland 2 points ❑ Freshwater tidal wetland _ 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftz. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple /oosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species _ points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1. 1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. if you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are r = I HIGH = 3 points 0 z 2 Wetand Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 9 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number -f?' H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. ❑ Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long) ❑ Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland ❑ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) ❑ Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) ❑ At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If Score is: ❑ 15 -18 = H ❑ 7 -14 = M r0 - 6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site? H 2.1 Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat + ( % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) _ If total accessible habitat is: >'/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20 - 33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10 - 19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10 % of 1 km Polvvon ❑pints = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat + [ % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2) _ Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Poly ❑n o0ints = 0 H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (-2) <_ 50% of 1km Polygon is hig h intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If Score is: LI 4-6 = H M 1 -3 = M D < 1 = L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 ❑ It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) ❑ It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) ❑ It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species ❑ It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources ❑ It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) with in 100m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1. 2015 10 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number 'f7- WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. litt .//wdfvr.wa. ov/oubiications/00'IG5iwdfv�00'i65. df or access the list from here: htt :8wdfw wa ovlconservation/ hs/list, Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. ❑ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha) ❑ Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). ❑ Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. ❑ Old-growthlMature forests: Old -growth west of Cascade crest — Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests — Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. ❑ Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 — see web link above). ❑ ,Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. ❑ Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS reportp. 161— see web link above). ❑ Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. ❑ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report— see web link on previous page). ❑ Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. ❑ Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. ❑ Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. ❑ Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Forth - Effective January 1, 2015 12 WSDOT Adapted Form - March 2, 2015 Wetland name or number _M RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): LAe2M 4A F3 7_41 - 1572 Date of site visit: JA�_1/ (o Rated by � • "fi' aETi;P4-1-E Trained by Ecologyk Yes No Date of training__q_/_,5_ HGM Class used for rating�Q&jt� 6�Z4)1 L,11.,(,(_ Wetland has multiple HGM classes? Y 1� N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY 'j:— (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 _Category III —Total score = 16 -19 Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Water Quality Habitat Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H L H M H M Landscape Potential H L H L H M L Value M L H M L L EH TOTAL Score Based on Rntinoe r _ V� 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation !Value I Bog Mature Forest I I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5=H,L,L 5 = M, M, L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L, L, L 1 Wetland name or number F b DEPRESSIONAL ANDTLATS WETLANDS Water Quality. Functions- Indicators that the.site functions to improve water quality J 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. I points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 i Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or cluftLayerj is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > % of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/,a of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > A total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is >'/ total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < Y total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 7 6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 Q D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H _L1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 U D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 j D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Z Rating of Value If score is:X2-4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number F$ DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic:Functions -indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 j� Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 CO Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points =1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightiy constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing paints = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wetperiods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H ,6-11 = M Y 0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 (� D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 = H —X1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flvodin roble+ns. Choose the description that bestmatches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): o Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 ■ Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H 41 = M —0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number PO These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? I H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % cc or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 cc. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 jl Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 I Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30%cover) 2 structures: points = 1 I Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) j that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2 Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y. ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species 5 - 19 species < 5 species points = 2 points = 1 points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. (:D (: 0 :) (*) None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number H 1.5, Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians} Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is: 15-18 = H 7-14 = M X 0.6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km € olygon _ points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) —� <- 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M X< 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1, Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H Z1 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number WDFW Priority Habitats Priprity habitats listed by W12F (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. littfl f Iw(111v.wa.gnvliiuhlic.ltiolls/00165 wd[%v00 S 65•nciF or access the list from here: } tt 7: w fw.'w, .g Irongf wationlahs/list/) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -growth west of_Cascade crest -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests -Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover maybe less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number _F 2 RATING SUMMARY —Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): JApel�jl,-L ft ef_ P-9 T-. 1 1 :572 Date of site visit: I is fib Rated by to + �'!.9 ��,, t �:� Trained by Ecology? Yes _No Date of training-44,f HGM Class used for rating QFA*j t4d,!W A) Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y )( N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY JL (based on functions or special characteristics ^) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I -Total score = 23 - 27 Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score =16 -19 Category IV - Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings ,ite Potential H U L H L H "t andscape Potential H M H L H IN Value M L L H M TOTAL core Based on ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine 1 II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M, L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L 1 i Wetland name or number f_- D DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators.#hat the site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with nos urf ace water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface (or duff Iayej is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions).Yes = 4 No = 0 Q D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed; plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants >% of area points = 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants >'/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/io of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal pondinp or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > A total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 7Z Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _)L_6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive storm water discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 V D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes = 1 No = 0 O Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 or 4 = H _1 or 2 = M -yr-_0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 t D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 3 Rating of Value If score is: X 2-4 = H 1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 E Wetland name or number -f-P DEPRESSIDNAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions '-'Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland_: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an u nconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of stoma re during wetperiods: Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribt¢tian of the wetland [o stvr a in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H '�,, 641 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 Q D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes = 1 No = 0 t 1 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H '*f, 1 or 2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the hi hest scare i mare than one condition is mer. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redd5): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why _ . _ points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-2-4 = H : �: 1 = M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page I I I Wetland name or number These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0, Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class_ Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % cc or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 cc. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 _Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: paints = 1 _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• _The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland_ The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see textfor descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally Flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 �L Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 W. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed conarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 spoi _Ies points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams - in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 13 Wetland name or number ALD H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least A ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area In every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) 2 Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above I '::�- I Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-19 = H _7-14 = M ]�,_0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+[(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: 0.3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-29% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km PolvRon _ points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat,_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polyoon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) —� 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above f� Rating of Landscape Potential if score is:l4-6 = H - �1-3 = M 1= L Record the rating on the frrst page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It Is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above Rating of Value If score is: _Z = H _1= M ,k_0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 0 Record the rating on the first page 14 ' Wetland name or numberD WDFW Priority Habitats Priul•3w hahimus, listedby W12F Y (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. hIUL 65tU 65. i or access the list from here: 1�SJ:1 w 1liv,�v v rnnscrV7 l tilultis/Iist1) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: t - g ro l - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Maleire forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 60-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak i component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. _1 — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — [nstream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore_ (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web linkon previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. ` — Cliffs: Greater than 25 Ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number ff 6 RATING SUMMARY - Western Washington Name of wetland for ID #j: W TA 1--1672- Date of site visit: lhiillt. Rated by J . Trained by Ecology?)< Yes No Date of tralning 4'I is HGM Class used for rating_Eed�J"LP,�.d�rlrlM Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y X N r NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined) Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 _Category III — Total score =16 -19 Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H L H M L H M Landscape Potential H 10M H M L H L Value M L H L H L TOTAL Score Based on ��( Ratings U 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I lI Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest 1 Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8=H,H,M 7 = H, H, L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L 0lol1e 1 Wetland name or number FI5 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - indicators thatthe site functions to improve water quality D 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 bn key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points =1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff layerlayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > %: of area points = 3 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/lo of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/lo of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. 4 Area seasonally ponded is > %: total area of wetland points = Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _( 6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 O D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes = 1 No = 0 O D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes = 1 No = 0 0 D 2.4. Are there a her sources pollutants V� i in.tp #h®y,Wetlt are ryot�ted in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? source �. rLJ (A.0 X Yes = 1 No = 0 t Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = or 2 = M __,0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 1 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above Z Rating of Value If score is:42-4 = H 1= M �O = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number F fC DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologitfuinctioris= Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 4— Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet periods_ Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points =1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above l Rating of Site Potential If score is;,412-16 = H _6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page D 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential -to support hydrologic functions of the site? D 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 O D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 d Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above (� Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 3 = H _1 or 2 = M ,_O = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems . Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the hi hest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 • Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points =1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? D Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is: 2-4 = H 4_1 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page E Wetland name or number F 6- I These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important'habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of '< ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 __X_5easonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoll, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species 5 -19 species < 5 species points = 2 points =1 points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. ME CI (::0) (0)0 None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams "';?f•,y in this row Y,• are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number F t� H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) _ 2 :5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _4-6 = H 1-3 = M ^< 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) I — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H 1= M —0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. ): w fw.wa. r v/12liblic,iii ns/00165AYdfW0Q165,VdC or access the list from here: Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: O ci- rout WeSL as -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age. 1,6Iafure farest� - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources_ Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. v -A� Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are a 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number F F RATING SLJItiIIMARY -- Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): W1n IMF TAL 122 . Date of site visit: I &5r1lb Rated by J • yYww pti- Trained by Ecology?� Yes No Date of training HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y .' N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map sOVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY, (based on functions or special characteristics) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category 1—Total score = 23 - 27 _Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 _Category III — Total score =16 -19 Category IV — Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H a L H L H M L Landscape Potential H M H M L H _ L Value M L H L H M L TOTAL Score Based on � Ratings (� ;J r5 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H, M, M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M, M, L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L, L, L 1 Wetland name or number. i' F DEPRESSIONAL AND. FLATS WETLANDS Wafer Quality Functions - Indicatorsthat the site #unctions to improve water quality j 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface or duff layerlayerl is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 O D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of persistent plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 9S% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > %: of area points = 3 U Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points = 1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Lf Area seasonally ponded is >'r4 total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally voridcd is < % total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _�t 6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 Q D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 6 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 D D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes = 1 No = 0 O Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above O Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: _3 or 4 = H _1 or 2 = M :fN__0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 0 D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMOL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above tZ Rating of Value If score is: X2-4 = H 1= M �0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number F F DEPRESSIONAL AND.,FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic. Functions - Indicators that the site fun6tions to reduce flooding and stream degradation 4,0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland. - Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 L j Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during we perlods_ Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 43. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page ' 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H 'I, ] or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has floodlng problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): a Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 ■ Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? I O Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 ating of Value If score is: _2-4 = H 1 = WI _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page 11 Wetland name or number f F These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNMONS - Indicators that site functions.to provide'important habitat 1 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of Y. ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if: The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 tyres present: points = 1 :K5aturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points i 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ftZ. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species 5 - 19 species < 5 species points = 2 points = 1 naints = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. CO(:D (:0:) (*) None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number f F H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points, Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 1 -5� Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M 0.6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon 20-33% of 1 km Polygon 10-19% of 1 km Polygon < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 3 points = 2 points =1 points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity Total for H 2 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = Mk \ 1= L H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? points = 0 points = (- 2) points = 0 _ Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points =1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H _1= M '14 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 201S Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number f F WDFW Priority Habitats Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. IttC w iv.Wa. v ub 'trIQDS/00 165 AvdfW00 165, or access the list from here: itt ►v fw wa. nv rv-,I' S ) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independentof the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: Old -growth MIest Qf CI5C,9Clg CrV.-A - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. N -i ore. '(2. Asa - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number GB RATING SUMMARY —Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): We,1141nd 642 5, 71 l %X Date of site visit: �i(o Rated by Trained by Ecology?Yes No Date of training HGM Class used for rating _DPi1f&Aj� �tnM Wetland has multiple HGM classes? N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functionsX or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score =16 - 19 Category IV —Total score = 9 -15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Water Quality Habitat Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential H L H fv L H M Landscape Potential H L H L H M Value M L H V L H M l�' TOTAL Score Based on o m+i„Qe r b 1 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal I II III IV None of the above Wetland Rating System For Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H 8=H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M, M, L 4 = M,L,L 3 = L,L,L 1 Wetland name or number DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS . Water quality Functions = Indicators that -.the site functions to improve .water quality 0 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key) with no surface water leaving it (no outlet). points = 3 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet. points = 2 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points =1 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch. points = 1 D 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface for cluff_layeri is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions). Yes = 4 No = 0 D 1.3. Characteristics and distribution of Persistent Plants (Emergent, Scrub -shrub, and/or Forested Cowardin classes): Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > 95% of area points = 5 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, plants > %: of area points = 3 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants > 1/10 of area points =1 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed plants <1/10 of area points = 0 D 1.4. Characteristics of seasonal onding or inundation: This is the area that is ponded for at least 2 months. See description in manual. Area seasonally ponded is > Y. total area of wetland points = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > % total area of wetland points = 2 Area seasonally ponded is < / total area of wetland points = 0 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H 6-11= M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? D 2.1. Does the wetland unit receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 O D 2.2. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.3. Are there septic systems within 250 ft of the wetland? Yes =1 No = 0 D 2.4. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in questions D 2.1-D 2.3? Source Yes =1 No = 0 Total for D 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: �3 or 4 = H X1 or 2 = M f0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? D 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 d D 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where an aquatic resource is on the 303(d) list? Yes =1 No = 0 D 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality (answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found)? Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 2 3 Rating of Value If score is; ^2-4 = H _1= M 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page Wetland name or number C-9 DEPRESSIONAL AND FLATS WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions'.;.:Indicators that the site functions'to reduce flooding and stream degradation 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? D 4.1. Characteristics of surface water outflows from the wetland: Wetland is a depression or flat depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4 Wetland has an intermittently flowing stream or ditch, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outletpoints = 2 0 Wetland is a flat depression (QUESTION 7 on key), whose outlet is a permanently flowing ditch points = 1 Wetland has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet that is permanently flowing points = 0 D 4.2. Depth of storage during wet periods: Estimate the heightof ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For wetlands with no outlet, measure from the surface of permanent water or if dry, the deepest part. Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5 3 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3 The wetland is a "headwater" wetland points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft (6 in) points = 0 D 4.3. Contribution of the wetland to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of the unit points = 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points = 0 Entire wetland is in the Flats class points = 5 Total for D 4 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12-16 = H _6-11 = M _0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential'to support hydrologic functions of the site? J 5.1. Does the wetland receive stormwater discharges? Yes =1 No = 0 O D 5.2. Is >10% of the area within 150 ft of the wetland in land uses that generate excess runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 D 5.3. Is more than 25% of the contributing basin of the wetland covered with intensive human land uses (residential at >1 residence/ac, urban, commercial, agriculture, etc.)? Yes =1 No = 0 D Total for D 5 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_3 = H X1 or 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page D 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? D 6.1. The unit is in a landscape that has flooding problems. Choose the description that best matches conditions around the wetland unit being rated. Do not add points. Choose the highest score if more than one condition is met. The wetland captures surface water that would otherwise flow down -gradient into areas where flooding has damaged human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds): • Flooding occurs in a sub -basin that is immediately down -gradient of unit. points = 2 ■ Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient. points = 1 I Flooding from groundwater is an issue in the sub -basin. points = 1 The existing or potential outflow from the wetland is so constrained by human or natural conditions that the water stored by the wetland cannot reach areas that flood. Explain why points = 0 There are no problems with flooding downstream of the wetland. points = 0 D 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? O Yes=2 No=O Total for D 6 Add the points in the boxes above l sating of Value If score is: _2-4 = H Y1 = M �0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page N. Wetland name or number Gg These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNMONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat .i 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of % ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points = 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2, Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or % ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points A 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian miffoll, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. : 0 ! :) (*) ( ) 6) None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams - - in this row are HIGH = 3points r Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number GB H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least % ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of 5traftrj Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-18 = H _7-14 = M k 0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33 % of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If — 2 > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating on the first page H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet and of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H _1 = M Z 0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number &9 WDFW Priority Habitats PrioriPriorily habitaLs listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. w w v s 6 wd w0 65. �iF or access the list From here: Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha): Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Old-growth/Mature forests: old -growth ►vest of C:ascsKldc crest - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or> 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 - see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 It (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number KJ� 1 �01 w AJ BATING SUMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): _ Date of site visit: Rated by IV Trained by Ecology?X Yes No Date of training HGM Class used for ratin �a .�Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y X N NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined), Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY JZ� (based on functions K or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II —Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score = 16 -19 X Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings ite Potential H M H M(DL H M andscape Potential H 0 L H M (LP H M O Value M L H (!�> L H M Q TOTAL core Based on stings ¢ f 3 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I II Wetland of High Conservation Value [ Bog I Mature Forest I Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I Il Interdunal I II III IV None of the above 11 Score for each function based on three ratings (order of ratings is not important) 9=H,H,H 8 = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6=H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L, L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3 = LLL Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Raring Form - Effective lanuaiy 1, 2015 Wetland name or numberG��N� HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? 60 go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. [] go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats if -your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). (5 go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? -The wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO - go to 5 ES The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or numberG/�N NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated HGM class to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope+ Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 J I j Wetland name or number V-0-C k-1v SLOPE WETLANDS Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1%slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 _J Slope is > 2%-5% points =1 J Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the s (face for duff LayerLayerj is true clay or true organic (use NRC5 definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants >'14 of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > % of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants >'/ of area points = 1 Cj Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above -72 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12 = H _6-11= M >�_0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? D Yes=1 No= 0 S 2.2, Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question 5 2.1? Other sources P(] G—rS Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above j Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:'X 1-2 = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page Rating of Value If score is:_K2.4 = H _1= M _0 = L Kecora me raring on me firs( puye J 11 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 J J Wetland name or number , 19-G /r-Al SLOPE WETLANDS Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually> 1/e in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points = 1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_1= M )< 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 U Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1= M _X_0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 / Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6,2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score is!-2-4 = H X 1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number _aV-�31961kA1 These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1,1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 _Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. tM not include Eurasian milfail, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 (J < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether Interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described In H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. , D OD (:*D CC None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams " in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number--" / �0 / P4 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) �Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) ! Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_35-18 = H _7-14 = M _X_0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page I H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? I H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat thatdirectly abuts wetland unit). Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]— = % If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland_ Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ _ % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 I Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (- 2) 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above U Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-4-6 = H _1-3 = M _< 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highestscore that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 — it has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet anv of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If score is: _2 = H _i = M _0 = L Record the rating on the first page n Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number I�—G J 1:� iv ^) WDFW Priority Habitats i E_nriit li si:bitsts listed byyyJW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. Iwdl4v.�va:;;iy-laU WI�-OUQU i > I Al' Lv 1165.ptit or access the list from here: 1 1wr11'►y.►y co ryaUm lab1 I11 I 1 Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is 1 independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). i — Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish an wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PH5 report). — Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. 7 — Old-growth/Matvre Forests: oLy- Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/ conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions In WDFW PH5 report p.158 -see web link above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p.161 - see web link above). — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, anti/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 15 Wetland name or numbeFK��F-I�T�kI't-�k(//iLU✓ RATING SPMMARY — Western Washington Name of wetland {or ID r*W/1=D/i 1t<-r1KL4/jv,�� Date of site visit: �flFr Rated by ' Al Trained by Ecology7X Yes No Date of training�1. HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y <N NOTE: Form Is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined), Source of base aerial photo/map _ OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY M (based on functionsZ_ or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 Category III —Total score = 16 -19 _Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15 FUNCTION I Improving Hydrologic Habitat Water Quality Circle the appropriate ratings 0te Potential H M H M(D H M .andscape Potential H L H M( H M (V Value M L H ® L H M L TOTAL icore Based on 3 Ratings 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC CATEGORY Estuarine I Il Wetland of High Conservation Value 1 Bog 1 Mature Forest 1 Old Growth Forest I Coastal Lagoon I II Interdunal None of the above 1 11 III TV X Score for each — function based on three ratnigs (order of ratings is not important) 9 = H,H,H S = H,H,M 7 = H,H,L 7 = H,M,M 6 = H,M,L 6 = M,M,M 5 = H,L,L 5 = M,M,L 4 = M,L,L 3=L,L,L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name ornumber�_KA 10/K1r/KTK �U�KV�KV� HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? N9- go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats Tyyour wetland can he classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at anytime of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). 60 go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can he very gradual), X The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a Swale without distinct banks, X-The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO - go to S ff- The wetland class is Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). S. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, _The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number K Ik I KD I KF I KT/KU / KU 6 14W NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if presen> is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY'r0 DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated Slope + Riverine Slope + Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional + Lake Fringe Riverine + Lake Fringe Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland HGM class to use in rating Riverine Depressional Lake Fringe Depressional Depressional Riverine Treat as ESTUARINE Ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the ra tiny. Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 20111 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 W- " Wetland name or number Kf� I / KF kT f K�1 Iry kvJ SLOPE WETLANDS Waur Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to Improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characterlstics of the average slope of the wetland; (a 1% slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevotion for every 100 fi of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 Slope is > 2%-5% points = 1 Slope is greater than 5% points = 0 0 51.2, Th iI 2 in p$ow the surface [a_► duff la er is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definition$): Yes = 3 No = 5 13, Characterlstics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>7S% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants> % of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > Yz of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > Y of area points = 1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for nlants popnis = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above L _j Rating of Site Potential If score is:_12 = H _6_11 = M _X'0-5 = L Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? 5 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes=1 No= 0 5 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2.1? Other sources+7 S Yes =1 No = 0 Total for 5 2 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:-1-2 = M U = L Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? 5 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (Le., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list? _ Yes = 1 No = 0 C l S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub -basin where water quality Is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list. Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES Z if there is a TMDL for the basin in which unit is found. Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above j Rating of Value If score is;_2-4 = H _1 = M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form —Effective January 1, 2019 Record the rating on the first page 11 KAr�ICD�K��I�i �k�l�kv�KW Wetland name or number SLOPE WETLANDS Wdrolomic Ouwft6 izs `- Indicators that the site functions to -reduce flooding and str"M eroslo>ii S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually > 1/3 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points =1 U All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is:_i = M Y-0 = L Record the rating an the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland In land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes =1 No = 0 U Rating of Landscape Potential If score ls:_1= M -_0 = L S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? Record the rating an the first page S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points =1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 S 6.2, Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan? Yes=2 No=O Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Value If score Is:-2-4 = H i = M _0 = L Record the rating on the fist page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 I I I I I J J J J Wetland name or number KA /KP/KF/KT/ KW/kW gliwitlani aWpV to wettaows of all MGII mats H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes In the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of X ac or more than 1OX of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have> 30%cover) 2 structures: points=l _Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 f the unit has a Forested class, check if.• _The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20%within the Forested poiyson H 1.2. Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or X ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). Permanently flooded or Inundated 4 or more types present: points =3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 _Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = i Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 30 ft2. DWerent patches of the some species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. tm not include Eurasian miyoil, reed conaryQnus, purple foosestrije, [anadian thistle If you counted:,-'2- 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 <5 species points =0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described In H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you hove four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams i In this row "• 1� �*17 are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 13 V 0 U J rr •f. , Wetland name or number _ kfl kD / ICF/!«/ k tit l KV �IeuU H 1.5. Special habitat features: check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The'numberaf-chf8ksis the number of points. _Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed) At least Y. ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for fist of Srrarn)— Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Site Potential If score is:_15-16 = H _7-14 = M X0-6 = L Record the rating on the first page H Z.O. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit), Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+[(% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)= °% If total accessible habitat is; > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19°% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon _ — aoints = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: °% undisturbed habitat_+ [(°% moderate and low intensity land uses)/2]_ = % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50°% and > 3 patches points =1 _ Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon pours = 0 H 2.3. Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high Intensity land use points = ( 2) 5 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 T❑tal for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 4-6 = H _1-3 = M=_< 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0, Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetiond being rated. Site meets ANY of the following crlterW points = 2 — It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal Ilsts) — It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or In a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above _ Rating of Value If score is:_Z = H _1= M _O = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 u �ipal ��- Record the rating on the first page 14 Wetland name or number/ Kp• �Kf / k�/ KLl /KV/kvJ WDFW Priority Habitats 111JS11.1l}G irrhu. is listed hv_ WJ)J'CV (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washirgton Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. 1L,•':.w1f or access the list from here: 11llG,: /1 wd w.w;i,:vY,r}: �,ri� r+��tlt.! nL4Jia11iztL) Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit; NOTE. This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unitand the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors; Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and t wildlife (Full descriptions in 6VDFW PHS report). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests; 0 -L-LUL ibs�ggtj ti,A�s dsz A7:5x -Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi- layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. ttil.rtors ii�rtiais - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers ofsnags, and quartity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (Cull descriptions in WDFWPHS report p. 158 -see web link above), — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 - see web fink above]. — Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirement; for instream fish and wildlife resources. — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats, These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast iearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web fink on previous page), _l — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 rn) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation, — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (OAS . 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. — Snags and Logs: 'frees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast heightof> 20 in (51 cm] in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note; All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere, Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 2014 Update Rating Form -Effective January 1, 2015 J 15 11 Wetland name or number RATING SUMMARY -Western Washington Name of wetland (or ID #): & TAA_-V5r4Q Date of site visit: girlal 1`5 Rated by's. M'C"moprT� ��, Trained by Ecology?,& Yes No Date of traininp�Vo, HGM Class used for rating _ Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y Y, N NOTE: Form Is not complete without the figures requested figures can be combined). Source of base aerial photo/map _ OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY JM— (based on functions X or special characteristics_) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I —Total score = 23 - 27 - Score for each Category II — Total score = 20 - 22 function based Category III —Total score =16 -19 an ratings Category IV —Total score = 9 -15 (s Hair or ratings FUNCTION ` Improving Hydrologlc�f Habitat important) J Water Quality I — 9 = H,H,H Circle the appropriate ratings Site Potential M 0L �L H L g = H,H,M 7= H,H,L 6AH Landscape Potential L H M I> H M L 7= H,M,M - --- Value M L H M L H L TOTAL 6= H,M,L __ score Based on 6=M,M,M 5 = H,L,L Ratings 5 = M,M,L 4 = M, L, L 3 = L,L,L 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland CHARACTERISTIC Estuarine CATEGORY I 1[ Wetland of High Conservation Value I Bog Mature Forest 1 I Old Growth Forest 1 Coastal Lagoon Interdunal I 11 111 In IV None of the above Wetland Rating System For Western WA: 2014 Update 1 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 I j Wetland name or number P& Maps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington De ressionai Wetlands Map of, To answer questions: Cowardln plant classes D 1.3. H 1.3, H 1.4 f Hydropetiods D 1.4. H 1.2 Location of outlet (can be added to 117ap of h draperfods) D 1.1, D 4.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland icon be added to another ere) D 2.2, D 5.2 Map of the contributing basin 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - Including D 4.3. D 5.3 H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters In basin {frarn Ecology. website) Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA In which unit is found (from web] D 3.1, D 3.2 D 3.3 Riverine Wetlands Figure # Map of.• To answer questions: Figure # Cowardin plant_ classes H 1.1,.H 1.4 Hydroperiods H 1.2 _ Ponded depressions R 1.1 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) R 2.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants R 1.2, R 4.2 Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to another figure) - R 4.1 Map of the contributing basin R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303{d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) Screen capture of list of TIVIDLsfor WR4A In which unit is found (from web) R 3.2, R 3.3 Lake Frinize Wetlands Map of: To answer questions: Figure # Cowardln plant classes _ L 1.1, 1-4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants L 1.2 Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another flqure) L 2.2 _ 1 In, Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - Including H 2.1, H 2,2, H 2.3 palyp❑ns for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat _ Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters In basin (from Ecolo website) L 3.1, L 3.2 Screen capture of Ilst of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web L 3.3 _ Slope Wetlands of: To answer questions: F re # _Map Cowardin plant classes H 1.1, H 1.4 H)droneriods - H 1.2 Plant cover of dense trees shrubs, and herbaceous Elants S 1.3 _ ` f_ Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants S 4.1 [can be added to figure above) - -- Boundary of 150 ft buffer can be added to another figure) S 2.1, S 5.1 -1-km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of maof 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology( website) S 3.1, S 3.2 - _p Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found {from +veb) 53.3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 2 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 j Wetland name or number PLC HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington For questions 1-7, thb criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. If the hydrologic criteria listed in each questlon do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question B. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? DNO go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe Ifyour wetland can be classif ed as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverfne wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is notscored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats our wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (S ha) in size; —At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). le- 4.tN(] } go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) s the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be verygradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks, The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO -go to 5Y1�4 The wetland class is Slope �� ,T; vxc t cca,iuuall in very small and NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetl. � � ep o y y shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? _The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, _The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 3 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number I-ff-r NO -go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at sometime during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. 60 BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT [make a rough sketch to help you decide]. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class fisted in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit, classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit HGM class to being rated _ _ use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverine _ Slope + Depressional Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream Depressional within boundary of depression _ Depressional + Lake Fringe Depressional Riverine + Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other Treat as class of freshwater wetland ESTUARINE ifyou are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating System for Western WA; 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 PIC Wetland name or number 1 ;7° I SLOPE WETLANDS Water -equality Functions -:Andicators.tbat,Oe site functions to Improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? 5 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1% slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance) Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1%-2% points = 2 Slope is > 2%-S% points = 1 Slope Is greater than 5% points = 0 16 S 1.2. I'he sojl 2 n o the surface gr_ci iii la -) is true clay or true organic (use MRCS definitions): Yes = 3 No = 0 51.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants In the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > Y. of area Dense, woody, plants > % of area Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > % of area Does not meet any_ of the criteria above for plants Total for S 1 y Rating of Site Potential If score is:,12 = H _6-11 = M "�, 0.5 = L points =6 points = 3 points = 2 points = 1 points = 0 Add the points in the boxes above Record the rating on the first page S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? 5 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants? Yes =1 No = 0 5 2.2. Are there other sources of allutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question IS 2.1? Other sources _ A_ _ _ Yes =1 No = 0 Total for 5 2 Add the points in the boxes above Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:._X1-2 - M 0 = L 50; Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality Improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 ml) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that Is on the 303(d) list? Yes = 1 No = 0 S 3.2. Is the wetland Ina basin or sub -basin where water quality is an Issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin Is I on the 303(d) list. Yes =1 No = 0 S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which unit is found. Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 3 Add the points In the boxes above Rating of Value If score is:-L'N,2.4 = H _1= M _0 = L Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Record the rating on the first page 11 Wetland name or number PG SLOPE.WETLANOS Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion? S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usuolly>'/a in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows. Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points = 1 All nther conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score I s: _ 1 = M _O = L Record the rating on the first page S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 2S% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff? Yes = 1 No = 0 I� Rating of Landscape Potential If score is:_1= M _ 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: The sub -basin immediately down -gradient of site has flooding problems that result In damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds) points= 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub -basin farther down -gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points - 0 S 6.2. Has the site been Identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance In a regional flood control plan? /y5 Yes=2 No=O Total for S 6 JAdd the points in the boxes above Rating of value If score is:_2-4 = H 1= M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 12 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number . Po- T These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardln classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardln plant classes in the wetland, Up to 10 patches may be combined foreach class to meet the threshold of X ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 25 ac. Add the number of structures checked. _Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 I Scrub -shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 2 structures: points =1 -Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) 1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if.• xThe Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon H 1.2 Hydroperiods Check the types of water regimes (hydroperlods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y, ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 _Seasonally flooded or Inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or Inundated 2 types present: points =1 Saturated only 1 type present: points = 0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland _Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species, Do not Include Eurasian mllfoll, reed conarygross, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle If you counted: > 19 species points = 2 5 -19 species points =1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can Include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low =1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3points Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 13 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 z I Z 1 Wetland name or number 05- H 1,5, Special habitat features: Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. x Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 41n diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland _Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft 11 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood Is exposed) _At least X ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) -Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata) — Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above S e Rating of Site Potential If score is:__15-18 = H -�( 7-14 = M _0�r s L Record the rating on the first page H 2,0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat functions of the site? H 2.1. Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit), Calculate: % undisturbed habitat— +[(%moderate and low intensity land uses)/2)_= % If total accessible habitat Is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20-33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10-19% of 1 km Polygon points =1 < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: % undisturbed habitat_+ [(% moderate and low Intensity land uses)/2)—= % Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points= 3 Undisturbed habitat 30-50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10-50% and > 3 patches points =1 Undisturbed habitat <10%of 1 km Polvj;-i n — - Taints = 0 H 2.3. Land use Intensity In 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon Is high Intensity land use points = (' 2) -- <_ 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity paints = 0 Total for H 2 Add the pointy In the boxes above Rating of landscape Potential If score is_4-6 = H _1-3 = M - ' 1= L Record the rating on the first page H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated. Site meets ANY of the following criteria: points = 2 It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) — It provides habitat forThreatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) — It Is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species — It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources — It has been categorized as an important habitat site In a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) within 100 m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above -- Rating of Value If score Is:_2 = H 1 = M _D = L Record the rating on the first page Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 14 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number E' WDFW Priority Habitats PrItiri y habitats listed by WI}I V (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can he found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. �{ �/wyJj�s ►v:���_,w_,!pu III ica tit,; ltlti [ r.,", f wtjl►v[10 I GS.hJ or access the list from here: Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE: This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. — Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). — BiodiversityAreas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. — Old-growth/Mature forests: QkL-,gra vt h west of Casradj _j:jZ ,t - Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings: with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha ) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests - Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. — Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p, 158 - see web fink above). — Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. — Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non -forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p, 161 - see web lfnk above). — lnstream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources, — Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report - see web link on previous page). — Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. — Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. — Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diam eter at breast height of > 20 in CS cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 15 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number:_ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTIC'. Wetland Type Check off onv criteria that apaly to the wetland: Circle the category when the appraprlat* c4ledle are met. Category SC 1.0. Estuarine wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? — The dominant water regime is tidal, — Vegetated, and — With a salinity greater than 0.5 pot Yes -Go to SC 1.1_ No= Not an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? Cat. I Yes = Category I No - Go to SC 1.2_ SC 1.2. Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less Cat. I than 10% cover of non-native plant species, (If non-native species are Spartina, see page 25) At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. Cat. II —The wetland has at least two of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Yes = Category I No = Category II SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHICV) SC 21. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of High Conservation Value? Yes - Go to SC 2.2 No - Go to SC 2,3 Cat. I SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? Yes = Category 1 No = Not a WHCV SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? http:j/wwwi.rinr.%va. ov r�hI ilreftieskldafasearthlwnl►u�vcllands Pdl Yes - Contact WNHP/WDNR and go to SC 2.4 No = Not a WHCV SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on their webslte? Yes = Category I No = Not a WHCV SC 3.0. Bogs Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below. If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on Its functions. SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons, either peats or mucks, that compose 16 In or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No - Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks, that are less than 16 In deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on top of a lake or pond? Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No = Is not a bog SC 3.3, Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? Yes = Is a Category I bog No - Go to SC 3.4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory, you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present, the wetland is a bog. Cat. 1 SC 3.4, Is an area with peats or mucks forested (> 30% cover) with Sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce, or western white pine, AND any of the species (or combination of species) listed in Table 4 provide more than 30% of the cover under the canopy? Yes =1s a Category I bog No = Is not a bog Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 16 Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 Wetland name or number �' _ SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands Does the wetland have at least 1 contipuou_s acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer YES you wilt still need to rate the wetland based an Its functions. — Old -growth forests (west of Cascade crest); Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 in (81 tm) or more. — Mature forests (west of the Cascade Crest): Stands where the largest trees are 80- 200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an average diameter (dbh) exceeding 21 in (53 cm). Yes = Category I No = Not a forested wetland for this section Cat. I SC 5.0. Wetlands In Coastal Lagoons Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? — The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks —The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish (y 0.5 ppt) during most of the year In at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom) Yes — Go to 5C 5.1 No = Not a wetland In a coastal lagoon SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of aggressive, opportunistic plant species (see list of species on p. 100). —At least''/e of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. — The wetland is larger than 1/,0 ac (4350 ft2) Yes = Category I No = Category II Cat. I Cat. II SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based an its habitatfunctlons. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: — Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103 — Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105 Cat I — Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 Yes — Go to SC 6.1 No = not an Interdunal wetland for rating SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an B or 9 for the habitat functions on the form (rates H,H,H or H,H,M Cat. II for the three aspects of function)? Yes = Category I No — Go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger, or is it In a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger? Yes = Category I I No —Go to SC 6.3 Cat. III 5C 6.3, Is the unit between 0A and 1 ac, or is It in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac? Yes = Category III No = Category IV Cat. IV Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics If you answered No for all types, enter "Not Applicable" on Summary Form Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 17 Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015 FA-10 FA SEGTION 16, TOWNSHIF ZI NORTH, RANGE 4 E, KM AL -FA FLAGS 1-10 r -rr voae,d --------- __ — FB-I V I ENOORT A V-4 V I EAFORT 15 56ALE: I "-60' SCALE: I "-60' J � 1 V I EINPOI�T 117 SCALE: 1 "-60' PC, 51p° rf� gas D 1101 Jly qrl v cdPd WL-�B PSS sd rak ` FLAB5 2-14 1 - .—B5—N .A65 I-q FFo sewovtAliy -Flow(sd wL-FD FLAGS 1-6 FD-i F Q _,I FD-6 S R,iDhq�)y-FIVAdI n o owfitf wL-FF FLA651-5 Pf Q FF--f t 0e04a Sea�.i� � a rlY FF- I '4t+ 0Ael V I EWPORT I E SCALE: 1 "-60' SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, H.M WL-El Pro FLA651-4 vw'111Y EI-4 +-ieoiled ho I)Aef lci-1 VIENFORT 2A SCALE- AL-EJ FLA651-5 EJ-I EJ-5 HL-FI EX. TRAIL, EK -5 FLA05 1-3. AL-EK FLA65 a -►-too TMP' FLAGS I-5 EL-1 EK-I 1_7100 ,spu e�ally AL-EM EL=aq FLA65 1-5 EL-a0 EM-1 �-5 VIENFORT 25 SCALE: I "-60' i WL-OB NORTH SEGTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. 5mDn6j!Iy Poo&d DE-�I DE-81 rWL-D�� FLAG5 1=81 EX. TRAIL, 7YP I i 1 / 1 I l� I I 1 j \ V I EIN�'DiZT 3 SGALE: I "�O' _ Pew bv7a lly ''[poded DF-D6•DY-dI J PFV n D o u.4�* sM ova l l y -Fl bbCUd - WL-DO FLAC"' I-B DF-I � �DF-5 WL-DF DG-8 FLAGS 1-5 DC -I WL-DH / FLAG5 1-5 OH-1 0_1-4 / PH-5 / DI -I / FLAGS 1-4 / 4 t war-.,` SEGTION 16, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 E, W.M. r EX. TRAIL, � TYR I i l I I Q-10 FLA65 1-4,I 103,105,101, 1 O-104 I10-106, 104, 5-8,1-1-13, —9, 18 BG—J A-13 BO-g BR-IU\ )� AC,- WL-BR , FLS 1-15 i B5-1 WL-SS-S FLA65 1-4 — I i EX15TINO EDGE OF CANOPY, TYP —r V I EWPORT 4 SGALE_ 1"-60' RE-igFAH Fem &a'Sa l Ploeo 46- seFajbrq lly -R u od cd P&Mtf msiretin i 1 1 1 rE3(Q 1 i BO-105 •� E Ba-Ion STORMINATER PON& BO-4 AC_.o� FLA6�51-10 �. - i 'f 1, AH—6 I AH-10 •— � AF-6 AF-I FLA51-6 ` ACC-1 WL-AE AG-13 FLA65 1-6 s STREAM -AG BR PF01p5M p�M smbnall &� &Kaj y'Flooc�d -�c oo A7 1 z a -< z a C) m ... -...� W 0 a m CD � r ' i f + � ' i. rl�'• ` � • 1 1 b At ' xi. : r K � ■i i � � i r. T t 'r' ' "� I; �M-•.,.r�r. `�, � r 'T. • ;,dy � -�-'tii � +� io tk uj mini CD Q N L LU _06) V+ 0 0 M L- p LLI 0 CP 0 0 -<4 m 3 0 N - b CD :win It 'Jul, i, , "`•'* =.'4, . � �X._�, - �-•ice" r 4 .i'D'.:.�. � ■- _ - Sol, 11 WOO fA Oki 61 � w .as o�irl 7. i Y, ' r -F.• RQL'[ILi : d -- ri :. _ �i L r v, a f ok cc sw am J I ~ ' 1* R Ea. not to _ ;� 4 r n r n 4 v r! �r >I";` a . fir' " • f `1 �'ti �� ; � ^ f. '��-�:.�� R Li L W 0 0 6, r• { l _ 1 4.. � k � � ` _ L ram, r , l.•-- � �•5 ' ' a r CD �, • OP I AkQpit - ;.+ � = di � � i•— �* � r o _ ter. i � s rr ; `✓_ . map I��rs�' . ova a', •�!..n d f�.: r. _ ; • . � .,-.�� '.�'.�i ��'� • .r W 1 H 4/ W • _T , Ili 11 •'4 - —1•r - w� 0 1 r- oil' 10 W J `� R W. ur , a -<4 a � O e A - - f - Wk aim 0 r I _r r Q 1 Q C:l -< z CD CD CD i--d M W d �7 0 0 m �J I I I I j 11 11 L9a O¢¢. Fu° . J a/r"IJ C wUJ<1_ _ _E01i Q DIV M-1a7 cam' VIP u w L ]a l/I �`• F .5.�. � ' !'u vim— ` � � w_v yS, i S antl PUN v w w...pilU•' N l i SJAV Pudr , * SJr,V U19Z 3a - M W r , r^ 14 S AAH 'W-d--- ul— S aAV 4191 .......»... r': ;, s U _ ' Y •'AV U151 A aAV E 2 e dntl 41E U' = N S q, s.'.'t 418 °..a, pwli j Ll Sa^tl lsl a 15s,y . :,;.v,�,.,....,..,.»..E - — a , a�•a��H 3enV Ul"t ms 5fi 4 / �P.ty yy.ii AV 419 d / / JN aAtl PUZ9 r, MS J�6 UI 11 MSa VU1Z1 p / , 9 a'--a•Ar•wea--' ms aAtl Is IL J _ w 26,,Avu SW- �_ NS aAV UILZ/ 4e my f e •� 'fix it ~� VL •'..M1 pF T ,i MS aAV UISE !fit v E i i two E OS C 3 N Ema s 0 Pa•'.a+JP { 'Sj _ • ONPCFH /J i 51 an-61 bR fai S Yas,a`e Ava ' `•E' 5 'j 51 vi is 1119 .f x aAV AhP,.Ig . IS DUIS N � � � � IS uy�l N 15 alaalS N c E iE m 1 _ _ c @ ■ 151IaHaf N IT auld N m 4 IS allIs S 1/i U b .1' 1$1epa� 5 I9 E N [ g i WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (TMDLS) Overview of the process Project Catalog by W RIA by County Funding Opportunities Project Development Priority Lists Related Information TMDL Contacts RELATED ECOLOGY PROGRAMS Water Quality Water ❑ualdc ,star truaRy Imoravament Projects by WRf4 W. Pati nlimn- h-%t WRIA 10: Puyallup -White ` The following table lists overview information for water quality improvement projects ""'r ,+ (also known as total maximum daily loads, or TMDLs) for this water resource inventory area fWRTA). Please use links (where available) for more information on a 92 Counties Kina courty Plcrce County 12 �• ��+ a. PIEkrE M k Waterbody Name Pollutant status*. TMDL Leads Clarks Creek D�ssobred Oxvoen Approved by EPA 5?0T'eY0n_Grav Meeker Creek Sediment 360-407-6407 Has an implementation plan dal Coliform Approved by EPA Has an implementation plan _Commencement Ba: Dioxin Approved by EPA Donovan Gray 360-407-6407 E�Ualrua Rimier Watvr.hed ,Flialsolifarm Approved by EPA Donovan Gran 360-407-6407 Multi-varAmetrr Approved by EPA Ammonia-N BOD (5-day) While 8u'sr Watershed Approved by EPA Upper White: Sediment Temperature Under Development Lower White . pH Approved by EPA Domwan Gray South rai Fecal Coliform Tributary: Temperature 360-407-6407 Has an Wilkeson/Gale implementation plan Creek Vows will be fated as one vF the fonow."r Approvra by zPA Under Deveropmenr or amptemenmuan