Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
17-102807
41% CITY OF Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) City of Federal Way Surface Water Management Conservation Property File No: 17-102807-00-SE Proposal: Proposed demolition of an existing single-family residence and associated structures with potential historical significance, and removal of underground fuel storage tanks. Proponent: Tony Doucette, City of Federal Way Surface Water Management 33325 80' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Location: 36818 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Dave Van De Weghe, AICP, 253-835-2638 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.21C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development (address below). This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on July 21, 2017. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (address below), no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 11, 2017, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Brian Davis Title: Director of Community Development Address: 33325 8t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: 253-835-2601 F Date Issued:. July 7. 2017 Signature: File 17-102807-00-SE Doc, I,D. 76132 Demolition Permit Application Maps_._._ .11 r 36606 PACIFIC HWY S 2921049044 �+I 3§82s 8TH AVE 3221049102 Properties within 300 J I -\ Y I- W ,. Z l i Y i i 0 150 300 600 Feet Parcels 2921049118 and 3221049141 are owned by the City and envelopes are not included 37007 8TH AVE 3221049146 -- 1 i i i i -- -+ i 36612 8TH AVF 2921649118: 1 -147 Subject Parcel (owned by City) Lf 4 d DEPT OF ECOLOGY RAMIN PAZOOKI WA ST DEPT TRANSPORTATION SEPA UNIT WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 47300 PO BOX 47703 PO BOX 330310 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7300 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 hcicustomerservice@wsdot.wa.gov separegister ccDecy.wa.gov ramin.pazooki@wsdot,wa.gov MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE FISHERIES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 karen.wa Iter(d-) muckleshoot. ns n . us CITY OF AUBURN 25 W MAIN ST AUBURN WA 98001 ksnyder -_auburnwa.gov CITY OF KENT ECON & COMMUNITY DEV 400 W GOWE ST STE 300 KENT WA 98032 planning@kentwa.gov CITY OF DES MOINES 21630 11T" AVE S DES MOINES WA 98198 d lath ropCa7desmoin eswa._gov GARY KRIEDT KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 201 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 ciary. kriedt(o)-kingcou nty. qov TINA VASLET PIERCE TRANSIT PO BOX 99070 LAKEWOOD WA 98496-0070 tvaslet iercetransii.ora PIERCE CO PW & UTILITIES 2702 S 42ND ST STE 628 TACOMA WA 98409 bziea Ie(c'bcopierce. wa. us PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS 2401 S 35T" ST #2 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 aclarkO-)co.ierce. wa. us BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 brandon.re non u allu tribe.com CITY OF PACIFIC BUILDING & PLANNING 100 THIRD AVE SE PACIFIC WA 98047 idodye a@ci.pacific.wa.us CITY OF TACOMA 747 MARKET ST TACOMA WA 98402-3769 sh i rley. schu ItzP,ci.tacoma.wa. u s DENNIS LEWARCH THP OFFICE SUQUAMISH TRIBE 18490 SUQUAMISH WAY SUQUAMISH WA 98392 dlewarchCa2sug uarnish. nsn. us KING CO ROADS DIVISION COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER 155 MONROE AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 ma int. roads kingcou niy,_,gov KING CO TRANSPORTATION 201 S JACKSON ST KSC-TR-0815 SEATTLE WA 98104 harold.tani uchi kin count . ov SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 chris.eahan(o)southkingfire.orq DAVID KORTHALS METRO TRANSIT 201 S JACKSON ST KSC-TR-0413 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 dayid.kortnais(a-)kingcounty gov JAMEY TAYLOR DNR SEPA CENTER PO BOX 47015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 senacenter@dnr.wa.gov ALGONA CITY HALL 402 WARDE ST ALGONA WA 98001-8505 kenf(aialgonawa.gov LAURA MURPHY TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 lau ra. m urphyO,m uckleshoot. nsn. us CITY OF EDGEWOOD 2224 104T" AVE E EDGEWOOD WA 98372-1513 cityhal {f@ci tyofedgewood. org STEVE FRIDDLE CITY OF FIFE 5411 23RD STE FIFE WA 98424 sfridd Ie@cityoffife. org BRIAN ASBURY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basbury(cNakehaven. o rg BEN HAN TRANSIT PLANNER KING COUNTY METRO MS KSC-TR-0413 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 plansrev iewCa--__ k ingcou nty.g ov JASON TESDAL CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS 23315 66T" AVE S KENT WA 98032 0ason.tesdai _ centurylink.com KRISTI KYLE PERRY WEINBERG OSP ENGINEERING WA/OR/N. ID PSE REGIONAL STRUCTURE SOUND TRANSIT AT&T CABLE MAINTENANCE PO BOX 97034 401 S JACKSON ST 11241 WILLOWS RD NE STE 130 BELLEVUE WA 98009-9734 SEATTLE WA 98104-2826 REDMOND WA 98052-1009 knstina,kyleCc7pse.com Perry. weinbergCdbsoundtransit.org JERRY STEELE COMCAST CABLE COMM 4020 AUBURN WAY N AUBURN WA 98002-1315 J TODD SCOTT- KING COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION 201 S JACKSON ST STE 700 SEATTLE WA 98104 todd.scott Dkingcounty._gov MICHAEL HOUSER DEPT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 michael.houser(d)dahp _wa.gov r)mmnlitinn Parmit Annlirntinn - AfifirPiiPS within 300 ft of parcel Resident Name Property Address Parcel Number Timothy and Billi Hyland 36930 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 322104-9008 Karen and Donald Elias 36905 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 322104-9098 Joyce Carlson 36825 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 922104-9102 Lorra and Joseph Schrader Lorra and Joseph Schrader Douglas Ostrom 37007 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 37007 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 36606 Pacific Highway S, Federal Way, WA 98003 322104-9145 322104-9146 292104-9044 322104-9098 KAREN & DONALD ELIAS 36905 8T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 922104-9102 JOYCE CARLSON 36825 8T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 322104-9145 & 9146 LORRA & JOSEPH SCHRADER 37007 8T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 292104-9044 DOUGLAS OSTROM 36606 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 322104-9008 TIMOTHY & BILLI HYLAND 36930 8T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 MY OF ' Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) City of Federal Way Surface Water Management Conservation Property File No: 17-102807-00-SE Proposal: Proposed demolition of an existing single-family residence and associated structures with potential 0 historical significance, and removal'` of underground fuel storage tanks. Proponent: Tony Doucette, City of Federal Way Surface Water Management, 33325 SUBJECT PROPERTY 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 vi A Location: 36818 8"' Avenue South, Federal T I Way, WA 98003 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way r- i r! i Staff Contact: Senior Planner Dave Van De Weghe, AICP, 253-835-2638 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act pursuant to RCW 43.21C.110. This information is available to the public on request. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request from the Department of Community Development (City Hall, 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003). This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on July 21, 2017. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (address above), no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 11, 2017, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on July 7, 2017. File 17-102807-00-SE Doc. I.D. 76142 r Department of Community Development Services 33325 8'" Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 CITY OF - - - 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 FederalWay www.cityoffederalway.com SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose ofcheckbst.• Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization, or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts, or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only wbenyou can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies and/or reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process, as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts ofyourproposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal, and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first, but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonprojectproposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans, and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B, plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for nonprojects) questions in Part B (Environmental Elements) that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. RECEIVE® JUN 12 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 1 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Demolition of Structures at 36818 8th Ave S. 2. Name of applicant: Tony Doucette (City of Federal Way) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Surface Water Management Division City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 4. Date checklist prepared: June, 2017 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipate requesting quotes as soon as possible and completing demolition of the structures in summer/fall of 2017. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The proposed project involves demolition of all structures on site, removal of two underground fuel storage tanks, decommissioning a septic tank and capping an existing well. The goal of the project is to restore the site to undeveloped conditions and allow it to revegetate and remain as conservation property. The only known future activity connected to the proposal is a future trailhead for a trails project and signag%xhibits at the trailhead to highlight the history of the homestead and regional significance. The full details of the signag%xhibit are unknown, but would be included with the project design. The demolition will be associated with historical mitigation efforts in coordination with DAHP and the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SWM contracted with Landau Associates to complete a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the property in January 2015 during the due diligence period prior to acquisition. The report is attached with this checklist. As part of the Phase I ESA, Landau verified the Wetland and Stream boundary delineation completed in August 2010 for the Enticknap and Bridges Properties. The wetland and stream mapping is also attached. Following acquisition of the property, SWM contracted with Landau Associates to prepare a Hazardous Building Materials Survey (HBMS) of the structures on site. The HBMS report is attached for reference. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 2 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No, no other pending government approvals covering this proposal are known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The only government approval known is a demolition permit for the structures. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The demolition project proposes to demolish six structures on site. The six structures include: 1. An approximately 1,800 sq. ft. farmhouse 2. Collapsing wooden barn 3. Toppled Cistern building (2nd floor fell over in 2016) 4. Work shed 5. Apple shed 6. Pump house structure The demolition project will also remove two underground storage tanks (USTs) identified in the Phase I ESA, decomission the existing septic tank and cap the existing well. One UST is at the SE corner of the Farm house and the second UST is approximately located between the Farm House and the Cistern building. A map of the parcel with structures and facilities to be removed is attached. Following demolition, the site will be restored and seeded with a native plant mix to allow the site to re -vegetate. The gravel parking area will be left as is pending future design of the West Hylebos Trail and trailhead locations. Educational signage will accompany the future project. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at street address 36818 8th Ave S, Federal Way, Washington, parcel no. 322104-9112 in the NW % of the NE % of Section 32, Township 21 North, Range 4 East of the Willamette Meridian. The vicinity is located west of Interstate 5 and east of Pacific Highway 99, north of S 373rd St and S of S of S 356th St. The six structures are scatted throughout the 2.0 acre parcel. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site: (underline/circle one): Flat, Kod! , hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 3 of 17 k:\I Iandouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The north and east sides of the parcel slope down between 15 and 25% to Hylebos Creek and the wetlands to the north. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Soils found on site are Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgC) and Tukwila muck (Tu) soil groups as defined by the National Resources Conservation Service. Both are Till soils and are categorized in Hydrologic Soil Group "C" and "D" respectively. We will not be removing any soils unless contaminated by USTs or during UST removal. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No unstable soil indications are evident and there is no known history of unstable soils. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The only earthwork on the project will be to remove the underground storage tanks (and any associated soil mitigation as needed). None of the structures have extensive foundations and the footprint will be graded to match the surrounding existing grade as needed. The total area disturbed during UST removal is expected to be 1,000 sq. ft. or less. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Limited erosion could occur in the event of poor site management and heavy rain, however the structures are located in pasture land and surrounded by vegetation. The contractor will be required to have a SWPPP and appropriate erosion and sediment controls in place to prevent erosion. Construction is anticipated this summer and fall to minimize work during the wet season. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No asphalt or buildings will remain on the site following demolition. A small gravel parking area will remain, totaling approximately Z200 sq. ft. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The project will provide erosion and sediment control consistent with the KCSWDM, including straw, silt fence, and wattles/dikes/berms as needed. The City will bid the project with a contingency to over excavate the soil surrounding the USTs in the event soil contamination has occurred. At the end of the project, the impacts to the earth should be all positive. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Air emissions would be limited to vehicle/equipment exhaust and manageable dust from building demolition. The demolition specifications will include asbestos abatement and dust control measures. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 4 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Aside from trucking and disposal of building materials, no emission or odor sources are anticipated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Asbestos abatement will be performed in accordance with state and federal laws. Dust control will be required of the demolition contractor. 3. Water a. Surface Water 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The North Fork of West Hylebos Creek crosses the northern portion of the parcel as shown in the site map. The North Fork joins the West Fork of West Hylebos Creek roughly 1,800 feet southwest of the parcel. West Hylebos Creek confluences with East Hylebos Creek in Pierce County South of Interstate 5 near Porter Way, then Hylebos Creek drains into the Hylebos Creek Waterway and the Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. All of the demolition work will be within the 200 ft wetland buffer, but all will be in the upland areas that are well outside and upslope of the wetland limits. At the end of the project, no structures will remain in the buffer and the site will be revegetated. Reference the attached site plan for structure location and proximity to wetlands. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be placed or removed from surface water or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No, the project will not require surface water withdrawals or diversions. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note the location on the site plan. No, the project does not lie within a 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No, the project does not involve and discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground Water Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 5 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses, and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No, groundwater will not be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes. The existing well on site will be capped, and no water will be discharged to groundwater. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. The existing USTs will be removed and mitigated as needed, and the existing septic tank will be abandoned on site. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The main runoff source will be stormwater, with possible water for dust control during demolition. The site will be managed to minimize erosion and sediment control using silt fence, straw, and wattles/dikes/berms as needed. Stormwater discharging from the site will either infiltrate or flow overland through the vegetated surroundings and eventually into the adjacent creek and wetlands. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Improperly managed waste materials could enter the ground or surface waters during construction if they dissolve with precipitation and infiltrate into the ground or if waste materials are not properly removed during UST removal. The City will have City representatives on -site to monitor and hold the contractor accountable for proper cleanup, removal and disposal of waste materials. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No, the project will not alter or otherwise affect drainage patters in the vicinity of the site. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Other than proper erosion and sediment controls, no measures to reduce or control surface, ground or runoff water, or drainage pattern impacts are needed because there are no impacts. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: X evergreen tree: X shrubs X grass X pasture _crop or grain alder, maple, aspen, other fir, cedar, pine, other Bulletin #050 —May 1, 2014 Page 6 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 X orchards, vineyards, or other permanent crops X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The only vegetation to be removed will be blackberries or other climbing vegetation that will be incidental to structure removal. No tree removal is anticipated, and following demolition, disturbed locations will be re -vegetated with native species. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species are known to be on the site or were identified the United States Fish and Wildlife IPac tool. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. No landscaping is proposed. Disturbed areas will be re -vegetated with a native seed mix. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. The main Noxious weed on the property is Himalayan blackberry. Additional noxious weeds/invasive species on the adjacent wetland parcels include Purple Loosestrife and Reed Canary Grass, however neither species has been observed on the project parcel. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site, or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: o$2ossum fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other _ b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species have been directly observed on site, but the mapping found on United States Fish and Wildlife IPac tool indicates the property is located within the geographical habitat of the Marbled Murrelet, Streaked Horned Lark, Yellow -billed Cuckoo, Bull Trout, and North American Wolverine. Proposed activities will only improve habitat for these species (buildings will be removed and the site re -vegetated). The project is part of a larger City effort to improve the conservation habitat within the West Hylebos and Spring Valley, and restore salmon habitat within West and North forks of West Hylebos Creek. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The United States Fish and Wildlife IPac tool lists species the following species of migratory birds that could potentially be affected by activities at this location: Bald Eagle, Black Swift, Caspian Tern, Fox Sparrow, Olive -sided Flycatcher, Peregrine Falcon, Purple Finch, Rufous Hummingbird, Short -eared Owl, Vesper Sparrow, Western Grebe and Willow Flycatcher. All listed birds are "birds of conservation concern." Again, Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 7 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 this project is part of a larger City effort to improve the conservation habitat within the West Hylebos and Spring Valley, and restore salmon habitat within West and North forks of West Hylebos Creek. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife include demolishing all on site structures, re -vegetating and allowing the property to return to a natural vegetated state and remain a conservation property. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. No known invasive animal species are on or near the site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The completed project has no energy needs. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No, the project would not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The completed project is demolition of all structures on site and restoration of the property to a natural state. As such, no energy conservation features are needed or applicable. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The main environmental health hazards are due to the existing USTs to be removed and the identified asbestos to be abated. A limited risk of fire and/or explosion is associated with UST removal. The cooking oil, diesel fuel and asbestos to be removed are all hazardous chemicals. However, this project will remove, abate and properly dispose of the tanks, liquid storage medium and hazardous building materials. The long term environmental health hazard on -site resulting from the project will be dramatically reduced and likely eliminated. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. The known or possible contamination locations are identified in the Phase 1 ESA completed prior to acquisition of the parcel. The possible contamination locations are the two USTs. Both will be removed and mitigated as needed during removal. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. Beyond those existing chemicals/conditions mentioned in question 1 above, no known existing Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 8 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 hazardous chemicals or conditions are known that might affect the project. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Asbestos, construction equipment fuel and lubricants, and the contents of the USTs are the only anticipated toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored or used during the project's development or construction. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire response is the main emergency service that might be required with this project, but during demolition only. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. Proper safety procedures for workers, equipment use and materials removal/disposal will be required of the project contractor. This includes preparation of a SWPPP, competent spill response preparedness, and compliance with state and federal law for disposal and documentation of asbestos and USTs. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The area is sheltered from traffic, commercial and industrial uses within the region and pleasantly very quiet. Noise (or lack thereof) will not affect the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long- term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The project will create only short-term noise in the form of construction equipment operation and removal of structures. Noise hours will be limited to those currently allowed by City Code. No long term noise will be associated with this demolition project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Work hours consistent with City Code will control noise impacts. No proposed measures are proposed to reduce or further control noise impacts. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The current use of the site is an uninhabited single family residential property owned by the City. Adjacent properties are either large single family residential lots or conservation property also owned by the City. The change in property use from an uninhabited single family residential lot to a conservation property will not significantly affect land use on adjacent properties Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 9 of 17 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? The southeast side of the property was used as a fruit orchard prior to the previous owner's purchase in 1964. After 1964, farming on site was limited. The parcel was not used as working forest lands at any point to our knowledge. Based on this history, no agricultural or forest land of long-term significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working Farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, filling, and harvesting? If so, how. No surrounding working farm or forest land business operations are adjacent to the proposal so the proposal will not affect or be affected. C. Describe any structures on the site. Six structures are located on the site. The structures include: 1. An approximately 1,800 sq. ft. farm house 2. A collapsing wooden barn 3. A toppled Cistern building (2nd floor fell over earlier in 2016) 4. A work shed 5. An apple shed 6. A pump house structure d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All six of the existing structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classification is RS 35.0. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is Single Family, Medium Density g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? The site does not have a shoreline master plan designation. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. The northern fifth of the site is designated as wetland with a stream crossing the parcel. Reference the attached site plan. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? No people will reside or work in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 10 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 The completed project will not displace any people. The site is currently uninhabited and will remain uninhabited. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. No measures to reduce or avoid displacement are necessary because no people will be displaced. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. The proposal will provide open space within the vicinity and it is adjacent to additional conservation properties. Although the proposal will not contain a single family residential home within the RS 35.0 zoning, the conservation property use will conform to the low density zoning of the area. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any. No measures are proposed other than the base goal of the project in preserving conservation property. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing will be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. One single family middle income home will be eliminated. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. No measures reduce or control housing impacts are needed because there will not be housing impacts. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views in the immediate vicinity will be altered or obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. No proposed measures are proposed or needed because there will not be aesthetic impacts. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 11 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 The proposal will not produce light or glare. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Since no light or glare will be produced, no safety hazards or view obstructions will occur. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No existing off -site sources of light or glare will affect this proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. No light or glares will be generated so no reduction or control measures are proposed. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? No designated or informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity at this time. This parcel is part of a future City plan to construct a trail through the Spring Valley, but the project has not yet entered the design phase. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No, the proposed project will not displace any existing recreational use. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. No measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation are needed because there are no impacts. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. The single family farm home is over 45 years old and will be prepared for listing with the national register as part of this demolition project. The Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation has already determined that the "Meers Homestead" is eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The City contracted with an Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants, LLC for a cultural resource survey and architectural recordation of the house to DAHP Levels I and Il. The recordation and cultural resources survey are included with this SEPA application. A building assessment by King County Historical and DAHP confirmation of national register status are attached with this checklist. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. No landmarks, features or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation are known. The City contracted with a cultural resources consultant to survey the site and the survey is included with this application. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 12 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. The cultural and historic resources survey included background research with DAHP, tribal cultural resource departments, King County, university libraries, local history museums and organizations, public records and other relevant repositories. The survey developed an Area of Potential Effect and was conducted by archaeologists using standard, industry -accepted methods appropriate to the project area. Identified cultural resources were fully documented in a summary Technical Report included with this checklist. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. The homestead is historically significant to the region and information and materials generated in the architectural recordation and cultural resources survey will be incorporated into a public interpretation effort. The location of the interpretation effort will be either on site as part of the future trails projector at a highly visible offsite location like City Hall, the Historical Society or other City Park. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The main public streets serving the site are State Route 99 (Pacific Highway 99) and S 373rd St. 8th Ave S is a residential collector street that is a dead end to the north and intersects S 373rd St to the South. Pacific Highway 99 is west of 8th Ave S and provides access north to the City of Federal Way and South to Milton, Fife and Tacoma. Interstate 5 is east of the project site and accessed by driving north on Pacific Highway 99 to the intersection with 5 348th St, then east on S 34YSt to the access ramps to Interstate 5. North and south access on Interstate 5 is available from S 348th St. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is poorly served by public transit. The nearest bus stop is for Pierce Transit route 500 at the intersection of Pacific Highway 99 and S 373rd St, almost % of a mile from the site. The 500 route connects riders between downtown Tacoma and the Federal Way Transit center. However, no pedestrian or residential public transit access is needed for this proposal. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed projector non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? The completed proposal will not provide or remove any parking spaces. The existing site is residential with a small gravel driveway. The driveway will remain. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No, the proposal will not require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity o� water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 13 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 No, the proposal will not use water, rail or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed projector proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as con =eirial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? No vehicular trips per day will be generated by the completed demolition project. Minimal vehicular traffic may be associated with the future trail project. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No, the proposal will not interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area. The proposal has no improvements and is at the end of a dead end street. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. No measures are proposed or needed to reduce or control transportation impacts. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? f so, generally describe. The project will not result in an increased need for public services. The demolition project does not include any improvements requiring public services. The future trails project may require limited maintenance by public works or parks maintenance staff. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No measures are proposed to reduce or control direct impacts on public services. 16. Utilities a. Underline/circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, peptic s stem, other Note that the septic system is not functional. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. I No utilities are proposed for the project. The existing well will be capped, USTs will be removed and mitigated and the septic will be decommissioned. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 14 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 Signature: 4-A Printed Name of Signee: Position and Agency/Organization:` PKANOft A 14� Date Submitted: Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 15 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The demolition project will reduce impervious surfaces and decrease water runoff. No emissions will occur following the demolition work, and no production, storage or release of toxic or hazardous substances or noise production will occur following the demolition work. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: No measures are proposed or needed. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposal will positively affect plants, animals, fish and marine life by restoring the property to a natural habitat to remain as conservation property. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: The proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish and marine life are to demolish the on -site structures, remove USTs, cap the existing well, and decommission the septic tank. The parcel will then be allowed to revegetate and remain a conservation property. Future trails and access will tread lightly, include educational materials and reduce the human footprint on the site compared to existing conditions. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The proposal will not deplete energy once demolition is complete and will not deplete natural resources. No extractive or energy consumption activities are proposed with the demolition project. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: No proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are required beyond the project goal of restoring the parcel to a natural condition. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The proposal will improve the buffer and habitat of environmentally sensitive areas by removing existing structures, utilities and preserving the acreage as conservation property. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 16 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No measures to protect resources or avoid or reduce impacts are needed beyond the project goal of restoring the parcel as conservation property. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The demolition project will not affect shoreline use and will have minimal affect to the land use. No shoreline uses are designated for the parcel and the existing land use is single family residential. The project will remove the single family residential home. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are needed. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The demolition project will not increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities because no new facilities will be added. The City owned property is vacant and no vehicular trips, public services or utilities are used. Future trails may generate limited vehicular traffic, but no significant increase on transportation demand is expected. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: There is no increase to demands so no measures to reduce or respond to increased demands are needed. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The demolition project will comply will all local state and federal laws to protect the environment. No industry, commerce, production, or residential use will be conducted on the site following demolition and the parcel will be preserved as conservation property. A future trails system will access the parcel and allow historic documentation of the homestead and Spring Valley area. Bulletin #050 — May 1, 2014 Page 17 of 17 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist May 2014 _ - Exhibit A-3 N Project Plan - � -fir• -_ _ - - J. Approximate Location of Approximate Location of = Septic Tank (Abandon) Pump House (Demolish) Approximate Location of � 11 Farm Fuel UST/AST (Remove and mitigate) 36818 8th Ave S Federal Way Single Family •:�; -, •` �- � ' ', � ---;;:� .� House (Demolish) NWT µA' j 1: "A aCistern Building' (Demolish) a y, Kitchen Fuel UST ry (Remove and mitigate) ,�; Shop Shed ` (Demolish) o 00 Existing Well J. ; (Cap and abandon) Apple Shed z+g`? (Demolish) '{ Barn (Demolish) Legend �-�•> Stream/Open Channel Wetlands F 25 50 100 Feet � I 5ft Countour Interval V* July 11, 2016 J Todd Scott Design Review Coordinator King County MS: KSC-NR-700 201 S Jackson St., Suite 700 Seattle, WA98104 In future correspondence please refer to: Project Tracking Code: 2016-07-04887 Property: DOE Meers Homestead Re: Determined Eligible Dear Mr. Scott: Allyson Brooks Ph.D., Director State Historic Preservation Officer RECEIVED JUN 12 2017 C1TY�03c1 RAOr�WAY �. Thank you for contacting the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) regarding the property at 36818 8th Avenue, in Federal Way. We concur with your professional determination/opinion that the Meers Homestead is ELIGIBLE to the National Register of Historic Places. The homestead is historically significant under criteria A as a property that reflects the rural agricultural roots of south King County at the turn of -the -century. Additionally the dwelling is significant under criteria C as an example of an increasingly rare house form; an "I -House." Once ubiquitous, such structures are unusual to find in the Puget Sound area. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Michael Houser State Architectural Historian (360) 586-3076 michael. houserCddah p. wa.gov State of Washington • Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343 • (360) 586-3065 www.dahp.wa.gov Historic Preservation Program, Department of Natural Resources and Parks L9. 201 S. Jackson, Suite 700, Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 477-4545 www.kingcounty.gov/landmarks King County BUILDING Building Name: Larson —Justice House Location: 36818 8th Ave S, Federal Way ASSESSMENT Date: July 8, 2016 Assessment Requested By: Tony Doucette, City of Federal Way Assessment Prepared By: Todd Scott, King County Preservation Architect Assumptions • This property is intended to be used for conservation purposes, and the potential trailhead for a future trail system. • All buildings are currently proposed for demolition. Some wetland restoration will occur along the edges of the property and a parking area will be developed where the house is located. • Funding is available for demolition, but no funding yet available for trails or trail improvements. Significance • The Larson —Justice House, aka Meers Homestead/M. A. Blouvelt House is listed in the King County Historic Resource inventory (HRI 1894), and has been determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (Houser letter, 7/11/16). • The house also appears to be one of the few remaining in King County which used vertical plank construction. • The two-story springhouse/water tower just east of the house is also a rare historic resource for King County, but it is near collapse and cannot be repaired. It is not possible to get close to this building to do any additional documentation. Building Site ■ Much of the property still conveys a sense of its historic rural character, including a large deciduous tree in the front yard, rolling pasture, and wetlands to the east. • The historic house is placed at the top of a hill at the northwest corner of the parcel, with a commanding view of the rest of the property. • Remnants of the historic barn southeast of the house are near collapse and cannot be salvaged. Much of the barn has already collapsed and the debris is covered with blackberry vines. • A root house is located southeast of the house and is in dilapidated condition. It likely cannot be salvaged. Condition of House • Overall fair condition, with a need for some repair work and maintenance, especially for the original section of the house. Various additions are in worse condition. ■ Gabled roof is nearing the end of its life, but should have a few more years left before replacement is required. Some evidence of water damage around central chimney. • Windows are in need of repair, including some missing glass. • House could be rehabilitated for occupation or another use. Any rehab would likely be more successful if a couple of the smaller additions are removed. Building Assessment Larson —Justice House • Significant repair/rehabilitation will need to occur inside the house due to damage to finish materials, and probable need to replace plumbing and electrical systems. Potential Future Actions • Restore the house as a museum or interpretive facility for the Historical Society of Federal Way. However, due to the presence of other historic houses that are managed by the organization, this seems unlikely. Adaptively reuse/rehabilitate the house as a facility associated with the West Hylebos Watershed Trail project. The house could be used for educational and interpretive purposes, trail visitor center, or even as temporary housing for visiting scholars, biologists, or environmental volunteers. Funding for rehabilitation of the house could come from a variety of sources, but historic preservation funding will be available only if the property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, or designated a local landmark via an interlocal agreement with King County. The most likely options are: 0 4Culture can provide annual funding for planning activities, construction drawings, and capital improvements through their preservation program, although funding is capped at $30,000 per application - http://www.4culture.org/preservatioTi/ipdex.htm o Heritage Capital Projects Funding is available every biennium, and offers a larger amount per application. However, the application period does not open again until 2018. htt www.washin onhistor .or su ort herita a ca ital roiectsfund o If the house is adaptively reused as a heritage facility there would also be the opportunity to access heritage funding from 4Culture - http://�vww.4culture.ore/heritage/index.htm Demolition of the house is currently the most likely scenario. Because of the rarity of this historic resource, it would be wise for the city to explore options on how to mitigate for the loss. The Washington Trust for Historic Preservation (WTHP) and the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) are available to offer suggestions on the best avenues for mitigation. The most likely options include some combination of the following: o Preparation of a National Register nomination, or other documentation that includes the history of the property, its occupants, and the construction method for the house, including high resolution photographs, site plans, floor plans, and scanned historic documents. Cost is likely $10-$20k. o Interpretive signage on -site that would be visible from adjacent trails, and would include information from the documentation listed above. Cost is likely $3-$10k. o Offer the house to anyone who is willing to move it to another location and restore it. While this is an unlikely possibility since the house would not be desirable by most for a residence, it could make a reasonable guest house or accessory dwelling unit on a residential parcel. Cost of a move is highly variable depending on lifting of power lines and width of roadways. A minimum of $50k, but that could easily go over $100k. 2 Building Assessment Larson —Justice House Recommendations If the city would like to explore options for adaptive reuse of the house (King County's preferred action): 1. Convene a gathering of all potential users for the trail system, affiliated organizations, and the historical society to explore possible uses for the house. If a viable use seems likely, apply to 4Culture for grant funds that can be used for a more in-depth feasibility study. 2. Remove most of the vegetation around the foundation of the house to increase visibility and reduce the potential for vandals and vermin to cause further damage. 3. Board up first floor windows and secure all doors to limit the potential for further damage from vandals. 4. Monitor condition of leaks around the chimney (and others as needed), especially during the winter. If the city wants to pursue demolition: 1. Confer with WTHP and DAHP about appropriate mitigation options. 2. Engage a historical preservation consultant to prepare necessary mitigation documents. Contact information for WTHP: Contact information for DAHP: Jennifer Mortensen Preservation Services Coordinator Washington Trust for Historic Preservation 1204 Minor Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 206-624-9449 jmortensen@preservewa.org 3 Greg Griffith Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Washington State/Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation Greg.Griffith@dahp.wa.gov 360-586-3073 (desk) 360-890-2617 (mobile) Building Assessment Larson —Justice House View from right of way West elevation 4 South elevation Northwest elevation Ann Dower From: Tony Doucette Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 11:44 AM To: Ann Dower Subject: Additional Demolition project questions Hi Ann, Following up on our conversation yesterday, the E&SC measures I expect for the project will primarily be perimeter based (straw wattles or silt fence) as needed. The only excavation effort will be removing the fuel tanks and I will either hydroseed the area or coordinate a volunteer planting event to re -vegetate the site. Regarding agency coordination, we will: ■ File a notification with Puget Sound Clean Air regarding asbestos removal, ■ Obtain permits from the King County Fire Marshall/South King County Fire and file intent with Ecology for the fuel tanks, ■ Submit an abandonment report to King County Environmental Services for the septic tank, and • File a notice of intent to Ecology for the well Let me know if you need any more information from me! Thanks, Tony 41k Federal OF Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, l e5s 1/ C /� hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, tWat a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) Q,-�otice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or f�osted to or at each of the attached addresses on -% -7 2017. Project Name File Number(s) Signature U/' Date , K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 St Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street Subject Site - K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sltes.doc 44k CITY OF Federal Way RECEIVEqUSTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES J U N 12 2017 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 CITY OF ERAL WAY 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT w_ww.cilyoffederalway.com APPLICATION NO(S) / -7— 142r 2D 7 — 5 1�, Date Wo./_017 Project Name ,5 Property Address/Location f� 27g Z vL ,S `Yl r_ !:,} Parcel Number(s) 3221051— f110 Project Description tk) ir. J/.. r/ • • 6XIS0,4 00C 7A "=Mg90WS,6171,_ • 4i5 96 cC /! .4 i t ac , / PLEASE PRINT t Ty a of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone ❑ Land Surface Modification ❑ Lot Line Elimination ❑ Preapplication Conference F Process I (Director's Approval) ❑ Process 11 (Site Plan Review) ❑ Process III (Project Approval) 17-1 Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) ❑ Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project ❑ SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision ❑ Subdivision ❑ Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information kS. 0 Zoning Designation * A c4 Comprehensive Plan Designation �DIyH / Value of Existing Improvements Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): NI�F Occupancy Type Construction Type Applicant - iol %500607c_ Name: '�F r/ � tJ� f";i tc"4?6'1� 1f**V11S V6*._ Address: Tj3Z,V- ffN *6- S City/State: 4,1,r 11,4 Qppo3 Zip: ;to S3S .170v Phone: 1 Fax: Email: roe aOc CM6p &r Signature: Agent (if Brent than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Cell Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: f1wir-43 A014 X`- Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Cell. Fax: Email: Signature: Bulletin #003 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\HandoutsuVlaster Land Use Application CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: 6/19/2017 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Desiree Winkler, Deputy Public Works Director Theresa Thurlow, Surface Water Manager Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Dave Van De Weghe, Senior Planner FOR DRC MTG. ON: 6/29/2017 - Completeness review FILE NUMBER(s): 17-102807-00-SE RELATED FILE NOS.: 17-102805-00-DE (demo permit) 17-102241-00-AD (wetland/stream report) PROJECT NAME: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - SWM CONSERVATION PROPERTY PROJECT ADDRESS: 36818 8TH AVE S ZONING DISTRICT: RS 35.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Internal SEPA completeness review of a proposal to demolish six structures (possibly historic), remove two underground storage tanks, cap existing well and abandon existing septic tank. Wetlands and streams present. LAND USE PERMITS: SEPA PROJECT CONTACT: Tony Doucette, tony.doucette@cityoffederalway.com, 253-835-2700 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: SEPA checklist Phase I environmental site assessment Hazardous building materials survey Cultural resources report Wetland & Stream delineation report Wed oPPW,� - P-XJ. Co, Hazardous Building Materials Survey Larson -Justice Property 36818 8th Avenue South Federal Way, Washington March 18, 2016 Prepared for City of Federal Way RECEIVED JUN 12 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUN€TY DEVELOPMENT LANDAU ASSOCIATES 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 (425)778-0907 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................1-1 2.0 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE...........................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Asbestos .............. ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Lead ................... ................. ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 PCB -Containing Materials..........................................................................................................2-1 2.4 Mold...........................................................................................................................................2-1 3.0 HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY AND SAMPLING......................................................3-1 3.1 Asbestos..................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Lead in Paint..............................................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls Survey..............................................................................................3-2 3.4 Mold Survey .............................................. ................................................................................. 3-2 4.0 HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY RESULTS..................................................................4-1 4.1.1 Asbestos .................. ......................................... ................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Lead in Paint ......................... .................................................................. ............. 4-1 4.1.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls Visual Survey...............................................................4-2 4.1.4 Mold Survey........................................................................................................4-2 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................5-1 6.0 LIMITATIONS .............................................. .................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................7-1 FIGURES Figure Title 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site Layout 3 Sampling Locations (2 Pages) Table Title 1 Analytical Results for Asbestos Samples 2 Analytical Results for Lead Paint Chip Samples Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 1-1 March 18, 2016 APPENDICES Appendix Title A AHERA Building Inspector Certificate B Laboratory Analytical Reports Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 1-2 March 18, 2016 1.0 INTRODUCTION Landau Associates, Inc. (LAI) has completed a Hazardous Building Materials Survey (HBMS) for asbestos containing material (ACM), lead -containing paint (LCP), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) - containing fluorescent light ballasts at the Larson -Justice Property located at 36818 8th Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington (subject property; Figure 1). The survey was conducted for the City of Federal Way prior to proposed demolition of the structures on the subject property. Six structures were present at the time of the HBMS: the farm house, cistern building, work shed, apple shed, barn, and pump house. Because of the farm house may be designated as a historical landmark and be restored rather than demolished, samples of mold from within the building were also collected in case abatement is needed as part of building restoration. This report describes the HBMS procedures and presents the findings of the survey. Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 1-1 March 18, 2016 2.0 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE The following section provides a discussion of relevant regulatory compliance related to the potential presence of ACM, lead, PCBs, and mold. 2.1 Asbestos The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulation, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 763, is the primary governing regulation for performing asbestos surveys. AHERA defines suspect ACM and specifies the minimum number of samples to be collected and analyzed from a suspect material. AHERA was originally enacted for school buildings; however, since 1994 it has been applied to public and commercial buildings by the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act worker protection regulations, specifically 29 CFR 1926.1101(k) and WAC 296-62-077, have also incorporated AHERA for demolition and renovation projects. The Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) Asbestos Control Standards, Regulation III, Article 4, should be consulted prior to renovation or demolition of structures containing ACM. This regulation is available at the following web address: http://www.pscleanair.org/regulated/reg3/3-4.odf. Typically, certified abatement contractors will prepare the required notifications prior to a planned asbestos abatement project. 2.2 Lead Worker and environmental protection requirements apply to all construction activities that may disturb LCP. Precautions must be taken during demolition and remodeling activities in accordance with Washington State regulations to address worker safety and protection of human health and the environment. Worker exposure, public health, and waste characterization are issues of concern when working with LCP during building demolition or remodeling. When workers may be exposed to lead, it is the employer's responsibility to ensure that work practices are in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting rule, 40 CFR 745. The property owner(s) should ensure that the public does not have access to the properties during demolition or remodeling activities. 2.3 PCB -Containing Materials PCBs are a federally regulated hazardous material. The disposal of PCBs is regulated by EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (EPA 2005). Materials with PCB concentrations greater than 50 mg/kg are considered a PCB bulk product waste and must be disposed of under TSCA guidelines per 40 CFR 761. EPA requires all PCB bulk product waste greater than 50 mg/kg to be removed by a certified abatement company once it has been identified. 2.4 Mold There are no state or federal regulations regarding mold. The EPA has prepared guidance documents for evaluating and managing mold contamination; however, they are for information purposes only. Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 2-1 March 18, 2016 The Washington State Department of Safety and Health (DOSH) will typically not conduct inspections for indoor air quality issues associated with mold. The exception being if there is obvious mold contamination, an exposure pathway is likely, and a physician has diagnosed a building -related illness or building occupants are suffering from symptoms consistent with exposure to the mold source (Department of Labor and Industries 2011). Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 2-2 March 18, 2016 3.0 HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY AND SAMPLING The HBMS was conducted to screen for the presence of hazardous building materials in the structures on the subject property. Because the barn and cistern house were in poor condition and appeared dangerous to enter, only the exteriors of these buildings were inspected and sampled. 3.1 Asbestos The purpose of the ACM survey described in this report was to evaluate materials in the structures on the subject property. The survey was conducted in compliance with the asbestos good faith inspection requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296-62-077, which requires the building owner to identify and properly dispose of ACM that may be encountered during demolition or renovation activities. The scope of services included the following: An asbestos survey conducted by an AHERA-certified building inspector (certificate provided in Appendix B) with a focus on identifying accessible suspect ACM. The survey included inspection and sampling of suspect accessible building materials in each of the buildings on the subject property, excluding those deemed unsafe to enter. • Collecting bulk samples of suspect ACM in accordance with Washington State Department of Ecology guidelines for surveys of buildings related to demolition or renovation projects. Submitting bulk samples to a laboratory for asbestos analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining by EPA Method 600/R-93/116. m Recording the quantity and locations of suspect ACM. o Preparing a report that summarizes the findings and conclusions of the survey. Samples were collected using a clean knife or chisel to penetrate all layers of each material. At least one teaspoon of each material was collected for analysis and placed in a laboratory -provided bag labeled with the location and sample identification. Prior to sampling potentially friable materials, a respirator was donned by the sampler and the sampling area was wetted with distilled water. All sampling equipment was wiped clean with a paper towel between sample locations. Following sample collection, a sample description and an estimated quantity of the suspect ACM were recorded on a field sample inventory form; this information is provided in Table 1. AHERA specifies that only one positive asbestos result necessitates designating a suspect material as ACM. It also specifies the minimum number of samples to be collected and analyzed to establish that a suspect ACM is non -ACM, based on the material type. The three material types recognized by AHERA are surfacing materials, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials. 3.2 Lead in Paint An LCP survey was conducted to assess the lead content in various types of paint present in the structures on the subject property. The survey included the collection of representative samples from the discrete paint types observed. Paint samples were collected using a clean paint scraper or razor Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 3-1 March 18, 2016 blade, and were placed in sealed laboratory -provided bags. Table 2 describes the types of paint identified and the locations that were sampled. Samples were collected from homogeneous colors and areas of paint in the buildings, and the samples were submitted to NVL under standard chain -of -custody (COC) protocols for lead analysis using atomic absorption by EPA Method 7000B. 3.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls Survey Fluorescent light fixtures within the buildings were inventoried and evaluated for the presence of PCB -containing light ballasts. Each fixture was opened and the ballast was inspected for "No PCBs" stickers. Those without "No PCBs" stickers were assumed to contain PCBs. It should be noted that all fluorescent light tubes contain mercury and must be either recycled or disposed of as a universal waste. The locations of any potential PCB -containing ballasts are shown on Figure 3. 3.4 Mold Survey The interior spaces of the farm house were observed for signs of water damage and mold. Bulk material samples were collected from areas of obvious mold growth. A comprehensive mold survey was beyond the scope of this project, so air samples were not collected. Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 3-2 March 18, 2016 4.0 HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY RESULTS The analytical results for the asbestos, lead paint -chip, and mold samples collected for the survey are presented in the following sections. The asbestos and paint -chip results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, and the analytical laboratory reports are provided in Appendix B. 4.1.1 Asbestos Materials sampled during the survey included gypsum wallboard; wall and ceiling plaster; potentially heat -resistant putty in the ironing board cabinet; various wall papers; fireplace and brick mortars; subflooring gap filler/leveling compound; acoustic ceiling tiles; roofing; various sealants; ceramic floor tiles; fibrous expansion joint material; sheet vinyl floorings; tar paper; stair tread; window putty; built-up roofing materials; laminate countertops; exterior sealants; and cement asbestos board (CAB). A minimum of one sample was collected of each potential or suspect ACM type from each homogeneous area. Additional wallboard and plaster samples were collected for analysis based on the estimated amount of material in accordance with AHERA guidelines, which consider these to be surfacing materials. LAI collected 51 samples of suspect materials for analysis in accordance with AHERA sampling protocols. The samples were submitted to NVL under standard COC protocols for analysis using polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining in accordance with EPA Method 600R-93/116. Asbestos was detected in two samples: U-CAB1-1 from the pump house at 21 percent chrysotile asbestos and U-DW2-1 from the farm house 2"d floor at less than 1 percent chrysotile asbestos. Based on these results, the cement board in the pump house represented by U-CA131-1 would be considered an ACM, while the gypsum wallboard system on the second floor of the farm house represented by U-DW2-1 would not. It should be noted that the inside of the barn and cistern building were not inspected because they were in poor condition and deemed unsafe to enter. Table 1 summarizes the materials sampled and the analytical results. Sample locations are shown on Figure 2. The laboratory analytical report is included in Appendix B. 4.1.2 Lead in Paint Twenty-nine paint -chip samples were collected from homogeneous colors and areas of paint in the buildings, and submitted to NVL under standard COC protocols for lead analysis using atomic absorption by EPA Method 7000B. Lead was detected at concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit in all but three of the samples collected. The detected concentrations ranged from 210 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (0.021 percent) to 160,000 mg/kg (16 percent) with an average concentration of 31,850 mg/kg (3.2 percent). The analytical results are summarized in Table 2. Sample locations are shown on Figure 3. The laboratory analytical reports are included in Appendix B. Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 4-1 March 18, 2016 4.1.3 Polychlorinated Biphenyls Visual Survey Five fluorescent light fixtures containing a total of four bulbs and five ballasts were present in the buildings. One of the five fixtures contained a ballast without a "No PCBs" sticker. This fixture was located in the work shed. 4.1.4 Mold Survey The interior spaces of the farm house were surveyed for the presence of significant water damage and mold. No obvious areas of mold were observed on the first floor of the house. Water damage was observed on the ceiling of the western bedroom of the second floor of the house, and black mold was observed growing on the walls in the hallway and bed rooms of the second floor. Two bulk mold samples (U-MOLD-1 and U-MOLD-2) were collected from areas of obvious mold growth in the hallway and central bedroom of the second floor. It is our understanding that the shed buildings will not be considered for restoration. Therefore, no mold samples were collected. However, the shed roofs were in generally poor condition, so it is likely that water intrusion and subsequent mold growth has occurred in these buildings. Mold was detected in both samples collected for analysis from the second floor of the house. The laboratory report states that the fungal growth was "Stachybotrys-Heavy" in sample U-MOLD-1 and "Chaetomium-Moderate" in sample U-MOLD-2. Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 4-2 March 18, 2016 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The sampling and analysis of potential/suspect ACM in the survey area identified two materials that contained detectable asbestos: cement board in the pump house building, and the gypsum wallboard system on the second floor of the farm house. However, the wallboard system was found to contain less than 1 percent asbestos when considered as a composite as allowed in Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration Regional Directive 23.30 (Department of Labor and Industries 2000) and is therefore not considered an ACM. We recommend that the cement board be abated in accordance with all appropriate state and Federal regulations prior to building demolition. While the wallboard system on the second floor of the farm house is not considered an ACM, certain requirements still apply to removal of this material, including: • Use of wet, non -aggressive methods and prompt cleanup. • Vacuums used must be HEPA filtered. • Worker training must include asbestos awareness and hands on training as given in WAC 296- 62-07722(5). • Respiratory protection must be based on overall dust levels. • A competent person must be assigned and trained under the requirements of WAC 296-62- 07728. Lead was detected in all but three of the paints sampled in the buildings. Therefore, precautions must be taken during demolition to address worker safety, protection of human health and the environment, and disposal of demolition debris in accordance with state regulations. When workers may be exposed to lead, it is the employer's responsibility to ensure that work practices are in accordance with the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries' lead in construction rule (WAC 296-155-176) and, for non -demolition projects, EPA's Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting rule, 40 CFR 745. The property owner should ensure that the public does not have access to the property during demolition activities. A composite sample of the demolition debris waste stream should also be collected and analyzed for leachable lead using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for lead. This will determine whether the demolition debris would be considered a dangerous waste for disposal purposes. Five fluorescent light fixtures containing a total of four bulbs and five ballasts were present in the buildings. One of the five fixtures contained a ballast without a "No PCBs" sticker. The fluorescent light tubes should be removed prior to demolition and recycled or disposed of as Universal Wastes. The light fixture identified as not having a "No PCBs" sticker should be assumed to contain PCBs and be disposed of in accordance with the Washington State Dangerous Waste regulations (WAC 173- 303). The molds Stachybotrys and Chaetomium were detected on the walls of the second floor of the farm house. Stachybotrys, which is commonly referred to as "black mold", in particular is associated with adverse health effects in humans. If the farm house is restored rather than demolished, a more comprehensive mold survey should be conducted and any and all mold identified, including those Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 5-1 March 18, 2016 areas identified during the current survey, should be abated as part of the restoration. It is our understanding that the shed buildings will not be considered for restoration. Therefore, no mold samples were collected. However, the shed roofs were in generally poor condition, so it is likely that water intrusion and subsequent mold growth has occurred in these buildings. If these buildings are to be restored, then a mold survey should be conducted. The inside of the barn and cistern building were not inspected because these buildings were deemed unsafe to enter at the time of the survey. Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation III Section 4.04(c) states: "Friable, asbestos -containing material need not be removed prior to a demolition or renovation, if the property owner demonstrates to the Control Officer that it is not accessible because of hazardous conditions such as: structures or buildings that are structurally unsound and in danger of imminent collapse, or other conditions that are immediately dangerous to life and health. The property owner must submit the written determination of the hazard by an authorized government official or a licensed structural engineer, and must submit the procedures that will be followed for controlling asbestos emissions during the demolition or renovation and disposal of the asbestos - containing waste material." Because the barn and cistern could not be entered at the time of the survey, it is unknown if friable potential ACM is present in these building. Therefore, these buildings should be assumed to contain friable ACM and demolished in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 5-2 March 18, 2016 6.0 LIMITATIONS A good faith HBMS has been conducted to identify ACM, LCP, and PCB -containing ballasts in the buildings on the subject property. Because the barn and cistern house were deemed unsafe to enter at the time of the survey Landau Associates did not inspect the interiors of these buildings. Asbestos - containing building materials may also be present in areas inaccessible during the survey. Construction methods and materials use vary with contractor and construction trades, and suspect ACM may exist in non -typical locations that were not investigated. During the demolition process, care should be taken that additional suspect materials, if encountered, are not disturbed without following the appropriate regulatory requirements for sampling and analysis. Where suspect materials are encountered, they should be assumed to be ACM until shown to be negative for asbestos through laboratory analysis. If laboratory analysis is not performed, all suspect materials should be assumed to be ACM. Landau Associates performed this sampling consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals currently practicing under similar conditions in the industry. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. Reuse of the information in this report for any other purpose without Landau Associates' written authorization shall be at the client's risk. The client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Landau Associates from all actions, claims, damages, and expense, including attorney fees, arising out of any unauthorized reuse. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Federal Way, and their representatives. The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are based on conditions encountered at the time of our study and on our experience and judgment. Landau Associates cannot be held responsible for the interpretation by others of the data contained in this report. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Cody M. Johnson, PE AHERA Building Inspector 138159 AHERA Project Designer 138714 CMJ/TLS/rgm Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 6-1 March 18, 2016 7.0 REFERENCES Department of Labor and Industries, WISHA Services. 2000. WISHA Regional Directive - Asbestos - Containing Joint Compound in Wallboard Systems. Olympia, Washington. December 28. Department of Labor and Industries, Division of Occupational Safety and Health. 2011. DOSH Directive - Indoor Air Quality. Olympia, Washington. January 14. EPA. 2005. Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Site Revitilization Guidance Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). US Environmental Protection Agency. Hazardous Building Materials Survey Report 0238070.010.011 Larson -Justice Property, Federal Way, Washington 7-1 March 18, 2016 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 1 = -—3=356Tfr St 0 Project Location 0 &5 1 Miles Data Source: Esri 2012 F Larson-Justice Property HBMS Report Federal Way, Washington '4'Y!e b.o s Creek 1 y 7 Q - w 18 Lakeland /.#/ South ,1 1 1 Enchanted , Park 1 Q Vicinity M a p Seattle • Spokane Federal Way acarrra Ilympia Washington Figure 1 Legend Q Subject Property 00 .9 Data Source: Esri World Imagery; King County GIs Note 1. Black and white reproduction of this color original may reduce its effectiveness and lead to incorrect interpretation. D 60 120 Scale in Feet Larson -Justice Property Figure LANDAU Hazardous Building Materials Site Layout ASSOCIATES Survey Report Ln N o. J a J r a J � ,r a J O LL m p ri a J O L O LL C N � N 7 O x O N N ri in J ` J CAO � V r� V- ri C5 a- o_ � J l0 • a J r•1 ri � a N J OP 17-4 ri D: N ri J o_ L °o n ri 0 i O a x J E ri ri ri `� a N a� a a Q a� Nl1 N H a a � �y O a E M a N a J W N a J oA N •O C m c C � L c c u o � !V1 a W E a Ln N TABLE 1 Page 1 of 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ASBESTOS SAMPLES LARSON-JUSTICE PROPERTY FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Sample Name Material Description Asbestos Content Estimated Quantity of Friability Confirmed ACM FARM HOUSE U- SV1-1 Brown rectangular -pattern sheet vinyl flooring Vinyl: ND, Mastic: ND U- 1`0131-1 Formica on kitchen countertops Formica: ND, Mastic: ND U- FBI-1 Fiberboard in kitchen ND U- PA1-1 Contact paper in cabinet drawer ND U- P1-1-1 U- PL1-2 U- PL1-3 Wall and ceiling plaster Skim Coat: ND, Plaster: ND Wall Paper: ND, Skim Coat1: ND, Skim Coat2: ND, Plaster: ND Skim Coatl: ND, Skim Coat2: ND, Plaster: ND U- PUT1-1 Putty in ironing board cabinet ND U- SV2-1 White sheet vinyl on cabinet shelves ND U- WP1-1 Wall paper under window Wall Paper: ND, Underlaying Skim Coat: ND U- M0111-1 White mortar around fireplace ND U- M0112-1 Gray and blue mortar around fireplace ND U- WP2-1 Wall paper around fireplace ND U- TI1-1 Black tile around fireplace Tile: ND, Mastic: ND U- TI2-1 Small tile in front of fireplace Tile: ND, Mastic: ND U- WP3-1 Wall paper on ceiling ND U- WP4-1 Wall paper on walls ND U- GFl-1 Gap filler/leveling compound on subflooring ND U- MOR3-1 Brick mortar on fireplace Mortar: ND, Brick: ND U- T13-1 Brown tile in front of fireplace Tile: ND, Mastic: ND, Grout: ND U- DWI-1 U- DWI-2 U- DW1-3 Drywall in bathroom Mud: ND, Paint: ND, Wallboard: ND ND ND U- WP5-1 Green painted wall paper ND U- WP6-1 Patterned wall paper Wall Paper: ND, Underlaying Skim Coat: ND U- CPL1-1 Plaster in chimney ND U- FOR2-1 Formica countertop piece under sink Formica: ND, Mastic: ND U- SV3-1 Sheet vinyl on bathroom floor Vinyl: ND, Backing/mastic: ND U- TP1-1 Tar paper on walls ND 10/21/15 P:\238\070\R\LI HBMS_tbl-2.xlsx asbestos Landau Associates TABLE 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ASBESTOS SAMPLES LARSON-JUSTICE PROPERTY FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Page 2 of 2 Sample Name Material Description Asbestos Content Friability Estimated Quantity of Confirmed ACM U- ST1-1 Stair tread Tread: ND, Mastic: ND U- CT1-1 12" x 12" nailed -on ceiling tile ND U- WPTl-1 Window putty on main house ND U- WPT2-1 Window putty on main house ND U- RM1-1 Built-up roofing Shingles: ND, Felt: ND, Tar: ND, Tar Paper: ND, Mastic: ND U- PA2-1 Contact paper in drawer ND U- SV4-1 Brown sheet vinyl on 2nd floor floors Vinyl: ND, Backing/mastic: ND U- FOR3-1 Formica on 2nd floor desk Formica: ND, Mastic: ND U- DW2-1 Drywall on 2nd floor Mud: CH3%, Paint: ND, Wallboard: ND, Composite Sample: < 1% U- DW2-2 Mud: ND, Wallboard: ND U- DW2-3 Mud: ND, Paint: ND, Wallboard: ND, Plaster: ND U- WP7-1 Wall paper on 2nd floor ND WORK SHED U- WPT3-1 Window putty on work shed ND U- FB2-1 Fiber board on ceiling in work shed ND CISTERN BUILDING U- RM2-1 Roofing material on cistern building ND APPLE SHED U- PA3-1 Fiber paper on apple shed walls ND U- PA4-1 Fiber paper on apple shed ceiling ND U- WPT4-1 Window putty on apple shed windows ND PUMP HOUSE U- SEA1-1 Sealant on pump house ND U- RM4-1 Roofing material on pump house ND U- CAB3-1 Cement board in pump house CH: 21% No 30 SF ND = Not detected N/A Not applicable CH = Chrysotile SF = Square feet 10/21/15 P:\238\070\R\U HBMS_tbl-2.xlsx asbestos Landau Associates TABLE 2 LEAD ANALYTICAL RESULTS PAINT -CHIP ANALYSIS LARSON-JUSTICE PROPERTY FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON Page 1 of 1 Sample Name Material Description Lead Concentration (mg/kg) Lead Concentration (percent) FARM HOUSE U- LP-1 White ceiling paint 11,000 1.1 U- LP-2 Blue wall paint 93,000 9.3 U- LP-3 Beige exterior cabinet paint 2,200 0.22 U- LP-4 Beige interior cabinet paint 87,000 8.7 U- LP-5 Blue cabinet paint 830 0.083 U- LP-6 Beige wall paint < 58 < 0.0058 U- LP-7 Light blue wall and ceiling paint 210 0.021 U- LP-8 Light brown paint on window trim 54,000 5.4 U- LP-9 Green wall paint in sunroom 160,000 16 U- LP-10 White trim and ceiling paint 110,000 11 U- LP-11 Green and red floor paint 20,000 2.0 U- LP-12 Light blue paint in closet 44,000 4.4 U- LP-13 Beige ceiling paint 510 0.051 U- LP-14 Pink paint in closet 620 0.062 U- LP-15 White trim paint in bedroom 22,000 2.2 U- LP-16 Green wall paint 4,500 0.45 U- LP-17 Black floor paint 4,600 0.46 U- LP-18 White paint in bathroom <50 <0.005 U- LP-19 White paint on 2nd floor walls 3,000 0.3 U- LP-20 Yellow upstaris trim paint 400 0.04 U- LP-21 Brown cabinet paint 4,400 0.4400 U- LP-22 Red paint on stairs 36,000 3.6 U- LP-23 Light blue exterior paint 1,300 0.13 U- LP-24 White exterior trim paint 1,000 0.10 U- LP-25 Blue window trim paint 14,000 1.4 CISTERN HOUSE U- LP-26 Blue and white paint on cistern building 110,000 11 WORK SHED U- LP-27 Blue exterior paint on work shed 530 0.053 APPLE SHED U- LP-28 Interiror blue paint in apple shed < 51 < 0.0051 PUMP HOUSE U- LP-29 Paint on pump house 43,000 4.3 <= Not detected above detection limit shown mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram 10/21/15 P:\238\070\R\U HBMS_tbl-2.xlsx Lead paint Landau Associates APPENDIX A AHERA Building Inspector Certificate APPENDIX B Laboratory Analytical Reports February 28, 2016 Cody Johnson Landau Associates 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Metals Analysis; NVL Batch # 1604307.00 Dear Mr. Johnson, INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory I Management I Training Enclosed please find the test results for samples submitted to our laboratory for analysis. Preparation of these samples was conducted following protocol outlined in EPA Method SW 846 -3051 unless stated otherwise. Analysis of these samples was performed using analytical instruments in accordance with U.S. EPA, NIOSH, OSHA and other ASTM methods. For matrix materials submitted as paint, dust wipe, soil or TCLP samples, analysis for the presence of total metals is conducted using published U.S. EPA Methods. Paint and soil results are usually expressed in mg/Kg which is equivalent to parts per million (ppm). Lead (Pb) in paint is usually expressed in mg/Kg (ppm) , Percent (%) or mg/cm2 by area. Dust wipe sample results are usually expressed in ug/wipe and ug/ft2. TCLP samples are reported in mg/L (ppm). For air filter samples, analyses are conducted using NIOSH and OSHA Methods. Results are expressed in ug/filter and ug/m3. Other matrix materials are analyzed accordingly using published methods or specified by client. The reported test results pertain only to items tested and are not blank corrected. For recent regulation updates pertaining to current regulatory levels or permissible exposure levels, please call your local regulatory agencies for more details. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. if you need further assistance please feel free to call us at 206-547-0100 or 1-888-NVLLABS. Sincerely, -4*� Nick Ly, Technical Director AIHA LAP, LLC ACCROM LAeQR ORY 1.888.NVL.LABS y�resn&xes www.nvllabs.com E AB;I101861 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 page 1 of 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. INVIL 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com L A B S Analysis Report Total Lead (Pb) Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604307.00 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Matrix: Paint Edmonds, WA 98020 Method: EPA 3051/7000B Client Project* N-A Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Date Received: 2/24/2016 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Samples Received: 15 Samples Analyzed: 15 Sample RL in Results Results in Lab ID Client Sample # Weight (g) mg/Kg in mg/Kg percent 16181215 LJ-LP-1 0.1918 51.0 11000.0 1.1000 16181216 LJ-LP-2 0.1937 51.0 93000.0 9.3000 16181217 LJ-LP-3 0.1466 67.0 2200.0 0.2200 16181218 LJ-LP-4 0.1916 51.0 87000.0 8.7000 16181219 LJ-LP-5 0.1900 52.0 830.0 0.0830 16181220 LJ-LP-6 0.1710 58.0 < 58.0 <0.0058 16181221 LJ-LP-7 0.1995 49.0 210.0 0.0210 16181222 LJ-LP-8 0.1933 51.0 54000.0 5.4000 16181223 LJ-LP-9 0.2011 49.0 160000.0 16.0000 16181224 LJ-LP-10 0.2044 48.0 110000.0 11.0000 16181225 LJ-LP-11 0.2049 48.0 20000.0 2.0000 16181226 LJ-LP-12 0.0918 110.0 44000.0 4.4000 16181227 U-LP-13 0.2009 49.0 510.0 0.0510 16181228 LJ-LP-14 0.1930 51.0 620.0 0.0620 16181229 LJ-LP-15 0.1161 85.0 22000.0 2.2000 Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Yasuyuki Hida Date Analyzed: 02/26/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date Issued: 02/28/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director mg/ Kg =Milligrams per kilogram RL = Reporting Limit Percent = Milligrams per kilogram / 10000 '<' = Below the reporting Limit Note: Method QC results are acceptable unless stated otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt. Bench Run No: 2016-0226-2 page 2 of 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Company Landau Associates Address 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Project Manager Mr. Cody Johnson Phone (425) 778-0907 Cell (206) 877-2173 Project Name/Number: N-A LEA® LABORATORY SERVICES NVL Batch Number 1604307.00 TAT 5 Days AH No Rush TAT Due Date 3/2/2016 Time 8:10 AM Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Fax (425) 778-6409 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Subcategory Flame AA (FAA) Item Code FAA-02 EPA 7000B Lead -by FAA <paint> Total Number of Samples Lab ID Sample ID Descriotion Rush Samples l L A B S A/R 1 16181215 LJ-LP-1 A 2 16181216 LJ-LP-2 A 3 16181217 LJ-LP-3 A 4 16181218 LJ-LP-4 _ A 5 16181219 LJ-LP-5 A 6 16181220 LJ-LP-6 A 7 16181221 LJ-LP-7 A 8 16181222 LJ-LP-8 A 9 16181223 LJ-LP-9 A 10 16181224 LJ-LP-10 A 11 16181225 LJ-LP-11 A 12 16181226 LJ-LP-12 A 13 116181227 LJ-LP-13 A 14 16181228 LJ-LP-14 A 15 116181229 LJ-LP-15 A Print Name Signature Company Uate I Ime Sampled by Client Relinquished by Client Office Use Only Print Name Sianature Comoanv Date Time Received by Jacob Laugeson _NVL Yasuyuki Hida NVL _�` 2/24/16 0810 Analyzed by 2/26/16 Results Called by ❑ Faxed ❑ Emailed Special Instructions: Date: 2/24/2016 Time: 3:46 PM Entered By: Fatima Khan page 3 of 4 1604307 I■ ry `VIfL Turn Around Ti METALS J z Hoar vut] J 4-F MUM L A B S J 2 Days ❑ 3 Days ❑ 4 Days INDUSTRIAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY J5Days J6-10Days H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory I Management I Training Company Landau Assoc Address Phone Please call foi TAT less than 24 Hours Project Manager Cody Johnson cell 206 ) 877 - 2173 Email ciohnson _ landauinc.com �x ( 1 Project Name/Number Project Location Larson -Justice ProperN 9 Total Metals A FAA (ppm J Air Filtei J Paint Chips (%) J Sail RCRA 8 RCRA 11 J TCLP J ICP (PPM J Paint Chips (CM) J Dust Wipes J Barium J Cl'rominm J Silver J Copper J GFAA (ppb) J Drinking Water J Waste Watei J.Arsenic J Mcrcui p .J Lead J Zinc J CVAA (ppb) JOther J Selenium J cadmium J Other Reporting Instructions U call i ) - J Fax - W Email cjohnson@landauinc.com . Total Number of Samples Sample IU uescription ^� 1 LJ-LP-1 2 LJ-LP-2 3 LJ-LP-3 4 LJ-LP-4 5 LJ-LP-5 6 LJ-LP-6 7 LJ-LP-7 8 LJ-LP-8 9 LJ-LP-9 10 LJ-LP-10 11 LJ-LP-11 12 LJ-LP-12 13 LJ-LP-13 14 LJ-LP-14 15 LJ-LP-15 2016 Sampled by Relinquish by Cody Johnson Landau 2/2C '24 Office Use Only _ Received by Analyzed by Called by Faxed/Email by 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 1 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 1 www.nvllabs.com page 4 of 4 February 28, 2016 Cody Johnson Landau Associates 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Metals Analysis; NVL Batch # 1604309.00 Dear Mr. Johnson, INVILY OF L A B S INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E S E R V I C E S Laboratory I Management I Training Enclosed please find the test results for samples submitted to our laboratory for analysis. Preparation of these samples was conducted following protocol outlined in EPA Method SW 846 -3051 unless stated otherwise. Analysis of these samples was performed using analytical instruments in accordance with U.S. EPA, NIOSH, OSHA and other ASTM methods. For matrix materials submitted as paint, dust wipe, soil or TCLP samples, analysis for the presence of total metals is conducted using published U.S. EPA Methods. Paint and soil results are usually expressed in mg/Kg which is equivalent to parts per million (ppm). Lead (Pb) in paint is usually expressed in mg/Kg (ppm) , Percent (%) or mg/cm2 by area. Dust wipe sample results are usually expressed in ug/wipe and ug/ft2. TCLP samples are reported in mg/L (ppm). For air filter samples, analyses are conducted using NIOSH and OSHA Methods, Results are expressed in ug/filter and ug/m3. Other matrix materials are analyzed accordingly using published methods or specified by client. The reported test results pertain only to items tested and are not blank corrected. For recent regulation updates pertaining to current regulatory levels or permissible exposure levels, please call your local regulatory agencies for more details. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. if you need further assistance please feel free to call us at 206-547-0100 or 1-888-NVLLABS. Sincerely, Nick Ly, Technical Director AINA LAP, LLC ACCRE611TE➢ LMRATORY lV115TRL'MTcBdP.Ch'�E5T4'. LA" NVL Laboratories, Inc. 1.888.NVL.LABS 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 www.nvllabs.com iPBfiRi861 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 page 1 of 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. INVIL 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com L A B S Analysis Report Total Lead (Pb) Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604309.00 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Matrix: Paint Edmonds, WA 98020 Method: EPA 3051/7000B Client Project #: N-A Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Date Received: 2/24/2016 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Samples Received: 14 Samples Analyzed: 14 Sample RL in Results Results in Lab ID Client Sample # Weight (g) mg/Kg in mg/Kg percent 16181236 LJ-LP-16 0.1918 51.0 4500.0 0.4500 16181237 LJ-LP-17 0.1718 57.0 4600.0 0.4600 16181238 LJ-LP-18 0.1959 50.0 < 50.0 < 0.0050 16181239 LJ-LP-19 0.1924 51.0 3000.0 0.3000 16181240 LJ-LP-20 0.1641 60.0 400.0 0.0400 16181241 LJ-LP-21 0.1416 70.0 4400.0 0.4400 16181242 LJ-LP-22 0.0531 190.0 36000.0 3.6000 16181243 LJ-LP-23 0.1998 49.0 1300.0 0.1300 16181244 LJ-LP-24 0.2091 47.0 1000.0 0.1000 16181245 LJ-LP-25 0.1944 51.0 14000.0 1.4000 16181246 LJ-LP-26 0.2046 48.0 110000.0 11.0000 16181247 LJ-LP-27 0.2014 49.0 530.0 0.0530 16181248 LJ-LP-28 0.1925 51.0 < 51.0 <0.0051 16181249 LJ-LP-29 0.0650 150.0 43000.0 4.3000 Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Yasuyuki Hida Date Analyzed: 02/26/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date Issued: 02/28/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director mg/ Kg =Milligrams per kilogram RL = Reporting Limit Percent = Milligrams per kilogram / 10000 '<' = Below the reporting Limit Note: Method QC results are acceptable unless stated otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt. Bench Run No: 2016-0226-1 page 2 of 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Company Landau Associates Address 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Project Manager Mr. Cody Johnson Phone (425) 778-0907 Cell (206) 877-2173 Project Name/Number: N-A LEA® LABORATORY SERVICES NVL Batch Number 1604309.00 TAT 5 Days AH No Rush TAT Due Date 3/2/2016 Time 8:10 AM Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Fax (425) 778-6409 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Subcategory Flame AA (FAA) Item Code FAA-02 EPA 7000B Lead by FAA <paint> Total Number of Samples Lab ID Sample ID Descriotion Rush Samples IN/V l L A B S A/R 1 16181236 LJ-LP-16 A 2 16181237 LJ-LP-17 A 3 16181238 LJ-LP-18 A 4 16181239 LJ-LP-19 A 5 116181240 LJ-LP-20 A 6 16181241 LJ-LP-21 A 7 16181242 LJ-LP-22 A 8 16181243 LJ-LP-23 A 9 16181244 LJ-LP-24 A 10 J 16181245 LJ-LP-25 A 11 16181246 LJ-LP-26 A 12 16181247 LJ-LP-27 A 13 16181248 1 LJ-LP-28 A A 14 16181249 LJ-LP-29 Print Name Signature Company Date Time Sampled by Client Relinquished by Client Office Use Oniv Print Name Signature Cmmnanv Date Time Received by Jacob Laugeson NVL 2/24/16 0810 Analyzed by Yasuyuki Hida NVL 2/26/16 Results Called by ❑ Faxed ❑ Emailed Special Instructions: Date: 2/24/2016 Time: 3:53 PM Entered By: Fatima Khan page 3 of 4 Turn Around 1 1604309 «,AIL METALS 2 Hour L A B S J 2 Days ❑ 3 Days 134 INDUSTRIAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY A5Days J6-10Days H Y G I E N E Please call for TAT less than 24 Hours S E R V I C E S Laboratory I Management I Training Company Landau Assoc Project Manager Cod 'ohnson Address cell 206 ) 877 - 2173 Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Phone Fax Project Name/Number Project Location Larson -Justice Property A Total Metals A FAA (ppm J Air Filter J Point Chips (%) J Sod RCRA 8 RCRA 11 J 1 CLP J ICP (PPM a Paint Chips (nn) J Dust Wipes J Barium J Chromium J Silver J Copper J GFAA (ppb) J Drinking Water J Waste Water J Arsenic J Mercury +J Lead J Zinc J CVAA (ppb) A othw J Selemum J Cadmium J Other Reporting Instructions - - — U Call I Fax - Ei„all cjohnson@landauinc.com Total Number of Samples Sample ID uescription ^r r 1 LJ-LP-16 2 LJ-LP-17 3 LJ-LP-18 4 LJ-LP-19 5 LJ-LP-20 — 6 LJ-LP-21 7 LJ-LP-22 8 LJ-LP-23 9 LJ-LP-24 10 LJ-LP-25 11 LJ-LP-26 12 LJ-LP-27 13 LJ-LP-28 14 LJ-LP-29 15 Sampled by Relinquish by Office Use Only Print Name Received by Analyzed by Called by Faxed/Email by Print Name �ignattire wrnPm iy Cody Johnson Landau 2/26/2016 !76 Sionature., Company Date Time c+'rer�ILA& 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 1 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 www.nvllabs.com page 4 of 4 March 1, 2016 Cody Johnson Landau Associates 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Bulk Mold Analysis, NVL Batch # 1604321.00 Dear Mr. Johnson, Enclosed please find test results for samples you submitted for fungal analysis. INVIL L A B S INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E S E R V I C E S Laboratory I Management I Training The analysis was performed by light microscopy at 400x magnification. Each sample was dissected into material components, or "layers." Samples from each layer were mounted on slides, in a clear liquid medium, either directly or following transfer to clear tape. Fungi were identified by the colors, shapes, and sizes of spores and spore forming structures, with reference to authoritative texts and slides prepared from EMPAT (Environmental Microbiology Proficiency Analytical Test) cultures. 'Sample Description' indicates visual appearance of the sample before analysis. 'Microscopic Observations' include features that identify the fungus and a general description of the surrounding matrix. Percentage values (%, if given) are based strictly on the fungal content of the sample, and might vary, depending on the sampling plan. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. Please do not hesitate to call if there is anything further we can assist you with. Sincerely, Nick Ly, Technical Director Enc.: Sample Results 1.888.NVL.LABS I.Rsi8.(G€5 www.nvllabs.com NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 page 1 of 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634,1936 I www.nvllabs.com Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Non -viable Fungal ID INVIL Direct Exam Analytical Results L A B S NVL Batch #: 1604321.00 Client Project: N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 2 Samples Analyzed: 2 Client Sample ID Lab ID Sample Description Fungal Growth U-MOLD-1 16181354 Paint chips Stachybotrys - Heavy Comments:Mold growth. Client Sample ID Lab ID Sample Description Fungal Growth U-MOLD-2 16181355 Paint chips Chaetomium - Moderate �Comments:Mold growth. Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Evelyn Ahulu Date:02/29/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/01/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Materials from bulk samples or tape lifts were prepared in lactophenol cotton blue or other liquid and in some cases transfer to transparent tape prior to analysis. Fungal spores and fragments were identified based on characteristic colors, sizes and shapes at magnifications of 150x to 1500x in accordance to NVL SOP 12.130.1. Percentage values were estimated strictly on fungal content in each sample. Results relate only to the samples listed in this report. Interpretation of these results is strictly the responsibility of client. If the sample was not collected by NVL personnel, the accuracy of the results will be affected by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. Unless stated otherwise, the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt. page 2 of 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. MOLD/ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY it4v 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 LABORATORY SERVICES f p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvilabs.com L A B S Company Landau Associates NVL Batch Number 1604321.00 Address 130 2nd Avenue South _ TAT 5-Days AH No Edmonds, DNA 98020 Rush TAT Project Manager Mr_. Cody Johnson Due Date 3/2/2016 Time 8:10 AM Phone (425) 778-0907 Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Cell (206) 877 2173 Fax (425)_778-6409_ _ Project Name/Number: N-A Project Location: Larson -Justice Property_ L Subcategory Bulk - Non -viable - Direct Exam Item Code MOL-03 _ __ _ . .___ --Mold Bulk Direct Exam <bulk> Total Number of Samples m_ Rush Samples __._ _.__ Lab ID Sample ID Description A/R 1 116181354 1 LJ-MOLD-1 A 2 116181355 1 LJ-MOLD-2 I A Print Name Signature Commy uaie i ime Sampled by Client Relinquished by Client Office Use Onlv Print Name Signature Comnanv Date Time Received by Jacob Laugeson NVL 2/24/16 0810 Analyzed by Evelyn Ahulu NVL 2/29/16 Results Called by ❑ Faxed ❑ Emailed Special Instructions: Date: 2/24/2016 Time: 4:44 PM Entered By: Fatima Khan page 3 of 4 IN1V.� L A B 5 MOLD INDUSTRIAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory ; Management I Training Company Landau Assoc. Address Phone 'turn Aroun 1604321 J4 Homs J 3 Days Q 4 Days_ J 5 Days J 6-10 Days Please call for TAT less than 24 Hours Project Manager Cody Johnson Cell 1206 877 - 2173 Erna;; Johnson@gmail.com Fax Project Name/Number Project Location Larson -Justice Property _I Air Non Viable- Direct Exam (Air-O-Cell, Versa Trap, Bio Cell, Micro 5, Cyclex) _I Fungal & Particulates ID Quantification ((Air-O-Cell, Versa Trap, Bio Cell, Micro 5, Cyclex) Bulk Non Viable- Direct Exam (Fungal ID Tape Lift, Swabs, Bulk) r:] Air Viable (ID & Quantification of Culturable Fungi) Reporting Instructions L_I Call Total Number of Samples 2 J Fax ( - [A Email cjohnson@gmail.com AID Print Name i Signature 1 Company I Date I Time Sampled by Relinquish by I Cody Johnson Landau _ 2/§3/2016 E ( 0 Office Use Only Print Name Sign 3t ' Company Date Time Received by- ?��/ /G — Analyzed by — — Called by Faxed/Email by 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206,634.1936 1 www.nvllabs.com page 4 of 4 March 2, 2016 Cody Johnson Landau Associates 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis; NVL Batch # 1604260.01 Client Project: N-A Location: Larson -Justice Property Dear Mr. Johnson, INVIL . L A B S INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory I Management I Training Enclosed please find test results for the 51 sample(s) submitted to our laboratory for analysis on 2/24/2016. Examination of these samples was conducted for the presence of identifiable asbestos fibers using polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining in accordance with both EPA 600/M4-82-020, Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples and EPA 600/R-93/116 Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. For samples containing more than one separable layer of materials, the report will include findings for each layer (labeled Layer 1 and Layer 2, etc. for each individual layer). The asbestos concentration in the sample is determined by calibrated visual estimation. For those samples with asbestos concentrations between 1 and 10 percent based on visual estimation, the EPA recommends a procedure known as point counting (NESHAPS, 40 CFR Part 61). Point counting is a statistically more accurate means of quantification for samples with low concentrations of asbestos. The detection limit for the calibrated visual estimation is <1 %, 400 point counts is 0.25% and 1000 point counts is 0.1 % Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. Please do not hesitate to call if there is anything further we can assist you with. Sincerely, -4*� Nick Ly, Technical Director 1.888.NVL.LABS Enc.: Sample Results CCC www.nvilabs.com KCWA Lab Code: 102063-0 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 page 1 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. INVIL 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 E p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com L A B S Bulk Asbestos Fibers Anal sis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch #: 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project #: N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Lab ID: 16180932 Client Sample #: LJ-WPT1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Beige crumbly material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Putty Compound, Calcareous particles, Paint Cellulose 5% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180933 Client Sample #: LJ-WPT2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Beige crumbly material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Putty Compound, Calcareous particles, Paint Cellulose 6% None Detected ND Wood fibers 3% Lab ID: 16180934 Client Sample #: LJ-WPT3-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White soft material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Calcareous particles, Paint Cellulose 3% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180935 Client Sample #: LJ-WPT4-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Beige crumbly material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Calcareous particles, Paint Cellulose 1 % None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180936 Client Sample #: LJ-MOR1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzea using Dom trt+ 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 2 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 11q y 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 V D p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs com L A B S Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project #: N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 1 of 1 Description: White crumbly powdery material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Fine grains, Binder/Filler Cellulose 5% None Detected ND Spider silk 1 % Lab ID: 16180937 Client Sample #: LJ-M0R2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White brittle crumbly material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Fine grains, Binder/Filler Cellulose 4% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180938 Client Sample #: LJ-MOR3-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: White brittle crumbly material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Fine grains, Binder/Filler Cellulose 5% None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: Trace red crumbly material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Clay/Binder, Binder/Filler None Detected ND None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180939 Client Sample #: LJ-ST1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: Red thin soft material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Calcareous binder Cellulose 3% None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: Tan flaky mastic Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Mastic/Binder, Binder/Filler Cellulose 4% None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 4�x� Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 3 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis py Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property IN VIL L A B S Batch M 1604260.01 Client Project* N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Samples Analyzed: 51 Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Lab ID: 16180940 Client Sample #: LJ-GF1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White crumbly material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Calcareous particles, Fine grains Cellulose 5% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180941 Client Sample #: LJ-CAB1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Gray cementitous material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Cement/Binder, Binder/Filler, Fine grains Cellulose 6% Chrysotile 21% Paint Lab ID: 16180942 Client Sample #: LJ-CPL1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Off-white crumbly sandy material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Mineral grains, Sand Cellulose 4% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180943 Client Sample #: LJ-SV1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: Red thin soft material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Calcareous binder, Vinyl/Binder Cellulose 15% Layer 2 of 2 Description: Gray/brown fibrous backing with brown mastic Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Mastic/Binder Cellulose 61 % Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 4 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Ihl Nr` IL_ 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs com L A B S Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project* N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Synthetic fibers 23% Lab ID: 16180944 Client Sample #: LJ-SV2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White sheet vinyl Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Vinyl/Binder, Synthetic foam None Detected ND None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180945 Client Sample #: LJ-SV3-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 4 Description: Off-white sheet vinyl Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Vinyl/Binder, Synthetic foam None Detected ND None Detected ND Layer 2 of 4 Description: White fibrous backing with mastic Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Mastic/Binder Cellulose 39% None Detected ND Glass fibers 26% Layer 3 of 4 Description: Tan sheet vinyl Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Vinyl/Binder, Synthetic foam None Detected ND None Detected ND Layer 4 of 4 Description: Beige fibrous backing with mastic Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Mastic/Binder Cellulose 43% None Detected ND Glass fibers 24% Lab ID: 16180946 Client Sample #: LJ-SV4-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 5 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property IN V]L)., L A B S Batch M 1604260.01 Client Project #: N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Samples Analyzed: 51 Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 1 of 2 Description: Beige linoleum Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Linoleum/Binder, Binder/Filler Cellulose 31% None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous backing with brown mastic and wood Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Asphalt/Binder, Mastic/Binder Cellulose 73% None Detected ND Wood flakes Wood fibers 11 % Lab ID: 16180947 Client Sample #: LJ-CT1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Brown compressed fibrous material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Wood flakes, Paint Cellulose 47% Wood fibers 21 % Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180948 Client Sample #: LJ-PUT1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Perlite, Paint Cellulose 1 % None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180949 Client Sample #: LJ-RM1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Comments: Unsure of correct layer sequence. Layer 1 of 5 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous material with granules and trace tar Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asphalt/Binder, Binder/Filler, Granules Glass fibers 41 % Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 6 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property INVI . L A B S Batch #: 1604260.01 Client Project #: N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Samples Analyzed: 51 Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 2 of 5 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous material with granules, tar, and plastic Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Asphalt/Binder, Binder/Filler, Granules Glass fibers 45% None Detected ND Plastic Layer 3 of 5 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous material with granules Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Asphalt/Binder, Binder/Filler, Granules Glass fibers 43% None Detected ND Layer 4 of 5 Description: Black asphaltic thin mastic with plastic Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Mastic/Binder, Asphalt/Binder, Plastic Cellulose 4% None Detected ND Glass fibers 2% Layer 5 of 5 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous felt Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Asphalt/Binder Cellulose 79% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180950 Client Sample #: LJ-RM2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Comments: Sample was dried prior to analysis. Layer 1 of 1 Description: Black layered asphaltic fibrous material with green granules Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Asphalt/Binder, Binder/Filler, Granules Cellulose 31 % None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180951 Client Sample #: LJ-RM3-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Comments: Sample was dried prior to analysis. Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 7 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. iwvul 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 / p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com L A B S Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch #: 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project* N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 1 of 1 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous material with granules and wood backing Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Asphalt/Binder, Binder/Filler, Granules Glass fibers 35% None Detected ND Wood flakes Wood fibers 21 % Lab ID: 16180952 Client Sample #: LJ-RM4-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous material with granules Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Asphalt/Binder, Granules Glass fibers 42% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180953 Client Sample #: LJ-SEA1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White crumbly powdery material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 8% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180954 Client Sample #: LJ-FB1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Brown flat compressed fibrous material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Wood flakes, Paint Cellulose 47% None Detected ND Wood fibers 29% Lab ID: 16180955 Client Sample #: LJ-FB2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories. Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 8 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers An sis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Brown compressed fibrous material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Wood flakes, Paint Cellulose 54% Wood fibers 24% lt4vli` ... L A B S Batch M 1604260.01 Client Project #: N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Samples Analyzed: 51 Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180956 Client Sample #: LJ-FOR1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: Brown flat compressed material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Laminate/binder, Resin/Binder Cellulose 29% None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: Clear soft adhesive Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Adhesive/Binder, Wood flakes Wood fibers 6% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180957 Client Sample #: LJ-FOR2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 7 of 2 Description: Brown flat compressed material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Laminate/binder, Resin/Binder Cellulose 31 % None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: Clear soft adhesive Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Adhesive/Binder, Wood flakes Wood fibers 4% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180958 Client Sample #: LJ-FOR3-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: Brown flat compressed material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Laminate/binder, Resin/Binder Cellulose 33% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date: 03/01 /2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 9 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. IN V 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 / p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.6341936 I www.nvllabs.com L A B S Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project #: N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 2 of 2 Description: Clear soft adhesive with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Adhesive/Binder, Paint Cellulose 1 % None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180959 Client Sample #: LJ-PA1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White fibrous paper material with pattern Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler Cellulose 87% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180960 Client Sample #: LJ-PA2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White fibrous paper material with orange/red wall -paper material and adhesive Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Adhesive/Binder, Fine grains Cellulose 85% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180961 Client Sample #: LJ-PA3-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Light brown fibrous paper material with debris Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Fine particles, Calcareous particles Cellulose 82% None Detected ND Sand Wood fibers 4% Lab ID: 16180962 Client Sample #: LJ-PA4-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Brown thin fibrous paper material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Organic debris Cellulose 54% None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 zw�> Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzeo using Dotn ti A 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 10 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 IN V IL . p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com L A B Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project* N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Synthetic fibers 28% Wood fibers 2% Lab ID: 16180963 Client Sample #: LJ-TPI-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Black asphaltic fibrous felt Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Asphalt/Binder Cellulose 83% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180964 Client Sample #: LJ-DWI-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 3 Description: White compacted powdery material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder Cellulose 5% None Detected ND Layer 2 of 3 Description: White compacted powdery material with paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Binder/Filler Cellulose 20% None Detected ND Layer 3 of 3 Description: Brown chalky material with paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Gypsum/Binder, Binder/Filler Cellulose 33% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180965 Client Sample #: LJ-DWI-2 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of I Description: White compacted powdery material with paint and paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 27% None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 4a� Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 11 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Anal sis By Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property IN Vf L L A B 5 Batch #: 1604260.01 Client Project #: N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Samples Analyzed: 51 Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Lab ID: 16180966 Client Sample #: LJ-DWI-3 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint and paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Paint Cellulose 19% None Detected ND Binder/Filler Lab ID: 16180967 Client Sample #: LJ-DW2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Comments: Composite result (per client request) for whole sample is less than 1 % asbestos. Layer I of 3 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint and trace paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Binder/Filler Cellulose 9% Chrysotile 3% Paint Layer 2 of 3 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Paint Cellulose 2% None Detected ND Layer 3 of 3 Description: Gray sandy crumbly material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Mineral grains, Sand Cellulose 7% None Detected ND Synthetic fibers 9% Lab ID: 16180968 Client Sample #: LJ-DW2-2 Location: Larson -Justice Property Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 12 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property INVIL L A B S Batch M 1604260.01 Client Project #: N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Samples Analyzed: 51 Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 1 of 2 Description: White compacted powdery material with trace paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Paint Cellulose 5% Layer 2 of 2 Description: White chalky material with paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Gypsum/Binder, Binder/Filler Cellulose 36% Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180969 Client Sample #: LJ-DW2-3 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 4 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Paint Cellulose 3% None Detected ND Layer 2 of 4 Description: White compacted powdery material with paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Binder/Filler Cellulose 19% None Detected ND Layer 3 of 4 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 2% None Detected ND Layer 4 of 4 Description: Gray crumbly sandy material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Mineral grains, Sand Cellulose 7% None Detected ND Synthetic fibers 10% Lab ID: 16180970 Client Sample #: LJ-PL.1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 4kg�:>_ Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 13 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. IN, 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com L A B Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project #: N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 1 of 2 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Paint Cellulose 3% None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: Gray crumbly material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Mineral grains Cellulose 7% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180971 Client Sample #: LJ-131-1-2 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 4 Description: Brown fibrous wall -paper material with trace adhesive Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Adhesive/Binder Cellulose 84% None Detected ND Layer 2 of 4 Description: Off-white compacted powdery material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Fine grains Cellulose 6% None Detected ND Layer 3 of 4 Description: White compacted powdery material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Calcareous particles Cellulose 4% None Detected ND Layer 4 of 4 Description: Gray crumbly sandy material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Sand, Mineral grains Cellulose 9% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180972 Client Sample #: LJ-PL1-3 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 3 Description: White compacted powdery material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder Cellulose 2% None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 14 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 iw vi p 206.547.0100 1 f206634.1936 I www.nvllabs corn L A B S Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project #: N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 2 of 3 Description: Beige compacted powdery material with paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Binder/Filler, Calcareous binder Cellulose 31 % None Detected ND Layer 3 of 3 Description: Gray/brown sandy material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Sand, Mineral grains Cellulose 13% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180973 Client Sample #: LJ-TI1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: Red brittle material with black surface Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Binder/Filler, Fine particles/Binder None Detected ND None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: White crumbly powdery material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Binder/Filler, Fine grains Cellulose 4% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180974 Client Sample #: LJ-TI2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: Beige ceramic square Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Ceramic/Binder, Binder/Filler None Detected ND None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: Off-white crumbly material with grains and mesh Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Mineral grains, Binder/Filler Cellulose 17% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180975 Client Sample #: LJ-TI3-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 15 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. IN AIL 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 L A B p 206.547,0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Anal sis By Polarized Light Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Batch M 1604260.01 Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Client Project* N-A Edmonds, WA 98020 Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Samples Analyzed: 51 Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Layer 1 of 3 Description: White ceramic Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Ceramic/Binder, Binder/Filler None Detected ND None Detected ND Layer 2 of 3 Description: Red brittle material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Clay/Binder, Binder/Filler None Detected ND None Detected ND Layer 3 of 3 Description: Gray brittle material with grains Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Mineral grains Cellulose 6% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180976 Client Sample #: LJ-WP1-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint and paper Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 41 % None Detected ND Layer 2 of 2 Description: White compacted powdery material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous particles, Calcareous binder, Paint Cellulose 4% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180977 Client Sample #: LJ-WP2-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: White crumbly material with wall -paper material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Asbestos Type: % Calcareous binder, Binder/Filler, Fine grains Cellulose 56% None Detected ND Lab ID: 16180978 Client Sample #: LJ-WP3-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date: 03/01 /2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 16 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Ana Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property is Layer 1 of 1 Description: Brown fibrous paper material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 77% Lab ID: 16180979 Client Sample #: LJ-WP4-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Brown fibrous paper material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 82% Lab ID: 16180980 Client Sample #: LJ-WP5-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Brown fibrous paper material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 84% Lab ID: 16180981 Client Sample #: LJ-WP6-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 2 Description: Brown fibrous paper material with paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 81 % Layer 2 of 2 Description: Trace white/red crumbly material Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Calcareous binder, Fine grains Cellulose 3% Lab ID: 16180982 Client Sample #: LJ-WP7-1 Location: Larson -Justice Property Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 03/01 /2016 Date: 03/02/2016 J L A B S Batch #: 1604260.01 Client Project #: N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Samples Analyzed: 51 Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 17 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Bulk Asbestos Fibers Analyjsis Microscopy Client: Landau Associates Address: 130 2nd Avenue South Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Mr. Cody Johnson Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Layer 1 of 1 Description: Brown fibrous paper material with paint and loose paint Non -Fibrous Materials: Other Fibrous Materials:% Binder/Filler, Paint Cellulose 67% Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Jacob Laugeson Date:03/01/2016 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date:03/02/2016 INS L A B S Batch #: 1604260.01 Client Project #: N-A Date Received: 2/24/2016 Samples Received: 51 Samples Analyzed: 51 Method: EPA/600/R-93/116 & EPA/600/M4-82-020 Asbestos Type: % None Detected ND Nick Ly, Technical Director Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using both EPA 600/R-93/116 and 600/M4-82-020 Methods with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %=0-3%, 5%=1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If sample was not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories. Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US Government page 18 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. ASBESTOS LABORATORY SERVICES 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Company Landau Associates NVL Batch Number 1604260.00 Address 130 2nd Avenue South TAT 5 Days AH No Edmonds, WA 98020 Rush TAT Project Manager Mr. Cody Johnson Due Date 3/2/2016 Time 8:10 AM Phone (425) 778-0907 Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Cell (206) 877-2173 Fax (425) 778-6409 Project Name/Number: N-A Subcategory PLM Bulk Item Code ASB-02 Total Number of Samples Lab ID Samole ID Project Location: Larson -Justice Property EPA 600/R-93-116 Asbestos by PLM <bulk> 51 np.-n.rinfinn Rush Samples Itf�Vmb- 1.11 L A B S A io 1 16180932 LJ-WPT1-1 I A 2 16180933 LJ-WPT2-1 A 3 16180934 LJ-WPT3-1 A 4 16180935 LJ-WPT4-1 A 5 16180936 LJ-MOR1-1 A 6 16180937 LJ-MOR2-1 A 7 16180938 LJ-MOR3-1 A 8 16180939 LJ-ST1-1 A 9 16180940 LJ-GF1-1 A 10 16180941 LJ-CA131-1 A 11 16180942 LJ-CPL1-1 A 12 16180943 LJ-SV1-1 A 13 16180944 LJ-SV2-1 A 14 16180945 LJ-SV3-1 A 15 16180946 LJ-SV4-1 A 16 16180947 LJ-CT1-1 A 17 16180948 LJ-PUT1-1 A 18 16180949 LJ-RM1-1 A Print Name Signature Company Date Time Sampled by Client Relinquished by Client Office Use Only Print Name Signature Company Date Time Received by Jacob Laugeson NVL 2/24/16 810 Analyzed by Jacob Laugeson NVL 3/1/16 2:12 PM Results Called by ❑ Faxed ❑ Emailed Special Instructions: Date: 2/24/2016 Time: 11:01 AM Entered By: Jacob Laugeson page 19 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. ASBESTOS LABORATORY SERVICES 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Company Landau -Associates __ Address 130 2nd Avenue South_ Edmonds, WA_98020 Project Manager Mr. Cody Johnson Phone (425) 77870907 Cell (206)_8.7.7-21.7_3.___ _ Project Name/Number: N-A NVL Batch Number 1.604260.00 TAT 5 Days __ _._ _ _AH __No_ Rush TAT Due Date 3/2/2016 Time 8710 AM Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Fax (425)_778-6409_ Project Location: Larson -Justice -Property- _ ____ _ Subcategory PLM Bulk Item Code ASB-02 - __ EPA 600/R7.93-116 Asbestos_ by_ PLM <bulk> Total Number of Samples _ 5J_ I nh in Rmmnia in fiacrrintinn Rush Samples IN vI I . L A B S A/R 19 116180950 LJ-RM2-1 _ _ A A 20 116180951 LJ-RM3-1 21 116180952 LJ-RM4-1 A 22 116180953 LJ-SEA1-1 A 23 16180954 LJ-1`131-1 A 24 16180955 LJ-FB2-1 A 25 16180956 LJ-FOR1-1 A 26 16180957 LJ-FOR2-1 A 27 116180958 LJ-FOR3-1 A 28 116180959 LJ-PA1-1 A 29 116180960 LJ-PA2-1 A 30 116180961 LJ-PA3-1 A 31 116180962 LJ-PA4-1 A 32 116180963 LJ-TP1-1 A 33 116180964 LJ-DWI-1 A 34 16180965 LJ-DW1-2 A 35 16180966 LJ-DW1-3 A 36 16180967 LJ-DW2-1 composite per client email 3/2/16 NL A Print Name Signature Company Date I ime Sampled by Client Relinquished by Client nffira i lca nnty Print Name Signature Comganv Date Time Received by Jacob Laugeson NVL 2/24/16 810 Analyzed by Jacob Laugeson NVL 3/1/16 2:12 PM Results Called by ❑ Faxed ❑ Emailed Special Instructions: Date: 2/24/2016 Time: 11:01 AM Entered By: Jacob Laugeson page 20 of 25 NVL Laboratories, Inc. ASBESTOS LABORATORY SERVICES iwvib. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 f p 206.547 0100 1 f206634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com L A B S Company Landau Associates_ NVL Batch Number 1604260.00 Address 130 2nd Avenue South TAT 5 Days AH No Edmonds, WA 98.020_ Rush TAT Project Manager Mr. Cody Johnson Due Date 3/2/2016 Time 8:10. AM Phone (425) 778-0907 Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Cell (206) 8.77-2173 Fax (425) 778-6409 Project Name/Number: N A Project Location: Larson -Justice Property Subcategory PLM Bulk Item Code ASB-02_ EPA 600/R-93-116_Asbesto,s by PLM <b.ulk> Total Number of Samples__, _51_— Lab ID Sample ID Description Rush Samples A/R 37 16180968 LJ-DW2-2 LJ-DW2-3 A 38 16180969 A 39 16180970 LJ-PL1-1 A 40 16180971 LJ-PL1-2 A 41 16180972 LJ-PL1-3 A 42 16180973 LJ-TI1-1 A 43 16180974 LJ-Tl2-1 A 44 16180975 LJ-T13-1 A 45 16180976 LJ-WP1-1 A 46 16180977 LJ-WP2-1 A 47 16180978 LJ-WP3-1 A 48 16180979 LJ-WP4-1 A 49 16180980 LJ-WP5-1 A 50 16180981 LJ-WP6-1 A 51 16180982 LJ-WP7-1 A Print Name Signature amipany Date Time Sampled by Client Relinquished by Client Office Use Only Print Name Signature Comoanv Date Time Received by Jacob Laugeson NVL 2/24/16 810 Analyzed by Jacob Laugeson NVL 3/1/16 2:12 PM Results Called by ❑ Faxed ❑ Emailed Special Instructions: Date: 2/24/2016 Time: 11:01 AM Entered By: Jacob Laugeson page 21 of 25 1604260 11 ,Vil 7uin Aiound Time ASBESTOS J 1 Hour J 24 Hciu�, J4 Days L A B S J 2 Hours J 2 Days J S Days INDUSTRIAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY J4Hours J3Days J]GDay; H Y G I E N E Please call for TAT less than 24 Hours S E R V I C E S f Laboratory I Management I Training Company Landau Associates Project Manager Cody Johnson Address Cell 206 ' 877 - 2173 Phone 425-329-0323 Email _cjohnson@1andauinc.com Pay Project Name./Numbe, I Project Location Larson -Justice Property J PCM Air(NIOSH 7400) J TEM (NIOSH 7402) J TEM (AHERA) J TEM (EPA Level II Modified) * PLM (EPA 600/R-93-116) J EPA 400 Points (600/R-93-116) J EPA 1000Points (600/R-93-116) J FILM Gravimetry (600/R-93-116) J Asbestos in Vermiculite (EPA 600/R-04/004) J Asbestos in Sediment (EPA 1900 Points) J Asbestos Friable/Non-Friable (EPA 600/R-93/1161, J Other Reporting Instructions _ J call J Fax r -4 Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Total Number of Samples 5'7- �auiNic iv you iNi•,vi i n, i� 1 LJ-WPT1-1 2 LJ-W PT2-1 3 LJ-WPT3-1 4 LJ-W PT4-1 5 LJ-MOR1-1 6 LJ-MOR2-1 LJ-MOR3-1 8 LJ-ST1-1 9 LJ-G F1-1 10 LJ-CAB 1-1 11 LJ-CPL1-1 12 LJ-SV 1-1 13 LJ-SV2-1 14 LJ-SV3-1 15 LJ-SV4-1 Sampled by Relinquish by Cody Johnson Landau 2/U2016 (p Office Use Only Received by Analyzed by Called by Faxed/Email by 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 1 www.nvllabs.com Z+ page 22 of 25 L A B S ASBESTOS INDUSTRIAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory I Management I Training Compan). Landau Associates Addi es_ Phone 425-329-0323 .L 1604260 Turn A.'Gunct Time J 1 Hour J 24 Hours J 4' Days J 2 Hou, s J 2 Dave A S Days J 4 Hours J 3 Days J 10 Days Please tali for TAT less than 24 Hours Project Manager Cody Johnson Cell 1206 ; 877 - 2173 En-aii cjohnson(a�landauinc.com Fay FlojeClI`lame,rJUmb& Plo,ecti-ocation Larson -Justice Property J PCM Air (NIOSH 7400) J TEM (NIOSH 7402) J TEM (AHERN J TEM ;EPA. Level II Modified) J PLM (EPA 600/R-93-116) J EPA 400 Points (600/R-93-116) J EPA 1000Paints (600/R-9.3-116) J PLM Gravimetry (600/R-93-116) J Asbestos in Vermiculite (EPA 600/R-04/004) J Asbestos in Sediment (EPA 1900 Points) J Asbestos Friable/Non-Friable (EPA 600/R-93/116) J Other Reporting Instructions J Call ' Total Number of Samples J Fax 5' Z -4 Email cjohnson@landauinc.com I pint Na,e I Signature I Company I Dare Time Sampled b,, Relinquish by L Cody Johnson Office Use Only Received by Analyzed by Called by Faxed/Emai! by 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 1 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.6341936 1 www.nvilabs.com Landau + 2M/2016 I ju page 23 of 25 1604260 I�,�j{ T_.rn Around Time 1` ASBESTOS _j 1 Ho�r J 24 Hours J4 Days L A B S J 2 HOWs J 2 Days J 5 Days INDUSTRIAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY J4Hours J3Days J10Days H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory I Management I Training Company Landau Associates Address Phone 425-329•-0323 Please call for TAT less than 24 Hours Project Manager Cody Johnson Ceu 206 ; 877 - 2173 Email Johnson -_landauinc.com Fax roiectName,'Num;ei Pro;ectLocation Larson -Justice Property J PCM Air (NIOSH 7400) J TEM (NIOSH 7402) J TEM (AHERA) J TEM (EPA Level II Modified) .J FILM (EPA 600/R-93-116) J EPA 400 Points (600/R-93-116) J EPA 1000Points (600/R-93-116) J PLM Gravimetry (600/R-93-116) J Asbestos in Vermiculite (EPA 600/R-04,/004) J Asbestos in Sediment (EPA 1900 Points) J Asbestos Friable/Non-Friable (EPA 600/R-93/116) J Other Reporting Instructions J call ( 11 J Fax ( A Email cjohnson@landauinc.com Total Number of Samples Z .]dl1 ipltC IV VCR IIJI!v i 1 LJ-PA4-1 2 LJ-TP1-1 3 LJ-DW 1-1 4 LJ-DWI-2 5 LJ-D W 1-3 6 LJ-DW2-1 7 LJ-DW2-2 8 LJ-DW2-3 9 LJ-PL1-1 10 LJ-PL1-2 11 LJ-PL1-3 12 LJ-T11-1 13 LJ-T12-1 14 LJ-T13-1 15 LJ-WP1-1 mini ivdni� 111.11P.,ly Cody Johnson Landau 2/42016 7l � Sampled by Relinquish by Ti Office Use Only Pr.nt Narne Signa[Company Date Time Received by Analyzed by Called by Faxed/Email by 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 1 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 1 www.nvllabs.com page 24 of 25 fwvib L A e s ASBESTOS INDUSTRIAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory I Management I Training Col-,pany Landau Associates Addi es - Phone 425-329-0323 H TurnAround Time .1604260 260 J 1 Hour J 24 Ho:us J 4 uayN J 2 Hours J 2 Days J 5 Days J 4 HoiirS J 3 Day, J 1::, Days Please call for TAT less than 24 Hours Project Manage, Cody Johnson Cell( 206 ' 877 - 2173 Email Johnson landauinc.com Proiec* Nar-e/Number Project Locatior Larson -Justice Property J PCM Air (NIOSH 7400) J TEM (NIOSH 7402) J TEM (AHERA) J TEM (EPA Level II Modified) J PLM (EPA 600,/R-93-116) J EPA 400 Points (600/R-93-116) J EPA 1000Points (600/R-93-116) J PLfv1 Gravimetry (600/R-93-116) J Asbestos in Vermiculite (EPA 600/ R-04/004) J Asbestos in Sediment (EPA 1900 Points) J Asbestos Friable./Nor) -Friable (EPA 600/R-93,/116) J Other Reporting Insructions J Call J Fax Total Number of Samples '-�32- } A E, d„ cjohnson@landauinc.com uesciipuon A'R 1 2 LJ-WP1-1 LJ-WP2-1 3 4 LJ-WP3-1 LJ-WP4-1 l 5 e 7 is LJ-W P5-1 LJ-WP6-1 LJ-WP7-1 9 10 11 12 ,3 14 i5 Sampled by Relinquish by " .• �, �i c �nmpa' y La.e Tiirc Cody Johnson — Landau 2YW/2016 cJ Office Use Only Received by Analyzed by Called by Faxed/Email by 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 1 p 206.547.0100 I f 206.634.1936 I www.nvilabs.com page 25 of 25 Phase I (Environmental Site Assessment Larson Property Federal Way, Washington January 20, 2015 Prepared for City of Federal Way RECEIVED JUN 12 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GOMMLINITY DEVELOPMENT 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES 950 Pacific Avenue, Suite 515 Tacoma, WA 98402 (253) 926-2493 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES 1-2 1.2 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS 1-3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SETTING 2-1 2.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.2 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 2-2 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION 3-1 4.0 AGENCY RECORDS REVIEW 4-1 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT 4-1 4.1.1 Subject Property and Adjacent and Proximate Sites 4-1 4.1.2 Adjacent and Proximate Sites 4-1 4.2 KING COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS 4-2 4.3 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4-2 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 5-1 6.0 INTERVIEWS 6-1 7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 7-1 7.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY 7-1 7.1.1 Storage Tanks/Structures 7-2 7.1.2 De Minimis Conditions 7-2 7.2 SURROUNDING AREA 7-2 8.0 WETLAND AND STREAM BOUNDARY VERIFICATION 8-1 9.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 9-1 9.1 DATA GAPS 9-2 9.2 OPINION 9-2 10.0 USE OF THIS REPORT 10-1 10.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT 10-2 11.0 REFERENCES 11-1 1/20/15 Y\238\06R010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES H FIGURES Figure Title 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site Plan 3 Subject Property TABLE Table Title Summary of Environmental Site Assessment Elements APPENDICES Appendix Title A Selected Site Photographs B Historical Aerial Photographs C Environmental Data Resources Historical Topographic Map Report D Environmental Data Resources Certified Sanborn Map Report E Environmental Data Resources City Directory Image Report F Environmental Data Resources Radius Map"m Report with GeoChecO (on DVD) G Qualifications of Environmental Professionals 1/20/15 Y:\236\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES in LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAI All Appropriate Inquiry AMSL Above Mean Sea Level AST Aboveground Storage Tank ASTM ASTM International CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations City City of Federal Way DDT Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane EDR Environmental Data Resources Inc. EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESA Environmental Site Assessment ft Feet I-5 Interstate 5 SR 99 State Route 99, Pacific Highway South USGS U.S. Geological Survey UST Underground Storage Tank ypb Years Before Present 1/20/15 YA236\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final doex LANDAU ASSOCIATES iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Landau Associates conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the following property located in Federal Way, Washington (subject property; Figure 1): Subject Property name: Larson Property Subject Property address: 36818 8th Avenue South Federal Way, Washington Legal description (or other Based on information from the iMAP (King County website 2014), physical property the subject property consists of parcel number 3221049112, which description): is approximately 2.00 acres in size and is located in the northeast corner of Section 32 of Township 21 N, Range 4.The subject property is owned by Anna M. Larson. POR NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 DAF - BEG NW COR SD SUBD TH N 86- 06-28 E 215 FT TH S 0-38-10 E 405.21 FT TH S 89-21-01 W TO W LN SD SUBD TH N TO POB - TAXABLE PORTION PARTIALLY EXEMPT UNDER RCW 84.36.381 THRU .387 The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to assess and document recognized environmental conditions for the subject property that may pose a potential liability to an owner in accordance with the guidelines of ASTM International (ASTM) as identified in its Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment Process, E 1527-13. Historical recognized environmental conditions and controlled recognized environmental conditions, as defined below, were also evaluated for the subject property. The subject property is located in a residential and wooded area of Federal Way, Washington (Figure 2). The subject property is improved with a 1,810 square foot (ft) farmhouse/residence built in 1900 (King County website 2014). The subject property is owned by Anna M. Larson. It is our understanding that the City is conducting this Phase I ESA to document conditions at the subject property as part of potential purchase of the subject property. The ASTM standard defines recognized environmental conditions as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property due to any release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of the appropriate governmental agencies. A historical recognized environmental condition is defined as a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been 1/20/15 YA236\066.01MR\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 1-1 addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. A controlled recognized environmental condition is defined as a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that have been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum projects allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. This assessment also identified, as appropriate, potential environmental concerns, which are conditions that do not meet the definition for a recognized environmental condition, but that warrant recognition by the user of this report. This Phase I ESA was conducted by the following professionals: Project Professionals Data Collection, Review, and I Sierra Mott, Staff Scientist Reporting: Site Reconnaissance: Jessica Stone, Senior Scientist (Environmental Professional) Senior Report Reviewer: I Timothy L. Syverson, L.G., Senior Associate Geologist (Environmental Professional) 1.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services performed, as described in our scope of work dated November 17, 2014, consisted of a review of the history of the subject property, a review of agency information, and a site reconnaissance to observe current land use activities and environmental conditions. The scope also included a wetland and stream boundary verification task. A previous preliminary critical areas evaluation, which included the subject property, was completed for the City by Landau Associates in 2010; the current wetland and stream boundary verification task was conducted to spot check the previously identified wetland and buffer boundaries. Significant changes were not identified along the wetland boundaries and the findings of the wetland boundary verification effort are included in this Phase I ESA report. Landau Associates conducted this Phase I ESA in accordance with the guidelines of ASTM as identified in its Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment Process, E 1527-13. This standard, while subject to changes (as are all ASTM standards), is recognized as meeting the due diligence provisions of the federal statute [Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA); 42 United States Code 9601(35) (13)] and the Washington State Model Toxics Control Act (Revised Code of Washington 70.105D.040) at the time this report was prepared. ASTM E 1527-13 satisfies the elements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) rule, which establishes requirements that purchasers must meet to limit their environmental liability under 1/20/15 YA236\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 1-2 CERCLA and qualify for liability protections, including the "Innocent Purchaser," "Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser," and "Contiguous Property Owner" liability defenses that are provided by CERCLA. The specific elements of the ASTM process are summarized in Table 1, along with a summary of where the information can be found in our report or if an element has not been addressed due to limitations/constraints imposed by project -specific conditions. Elements not included in ASTM E 1527- 13 (e.g., identification, sampling, and analysis of asbestos, radon, lead paint, and/or lead in drinking water; regulatory compliance; cultural and historic resources; indoor air quality and vapor intrusion including the potential presence of mold or other biological contaminants; industrial hygiene; health and safety; ecological resources; and endangered species) were also not included in our scope of services. As noted above, our scope of services also included a wetland and stream boundary verification task to spot-check the previously identified wetland and buffer boundaries. The findings of the wetland boundary verification effort are included in this Phase I ESA report. The Phase I ESA process is not a means of "finding everything there is to know about a property." Rather, it is an effort to evaluate the environmental liabilities associated with a property based on reasonably available information (both oral and written) within the budget, schedule, and project - specific limitations, all in accordance with EPA's AAI rule. Authorization to proceed with these services was provided by the City on December 12, 2014. 1.2 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The following summarizes exceptions, limitations, or restrictions to the scope of work: Exceptions to, or deletions from, the above I King County public records were not received at the referenced Scope of Work: time of preparation of this report. Weather -related property restrictions: I None. Property/Facility access restrictions: I The interior of the residence was not inspected. 1/20/15 Y1238\066,010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 1-3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND SETTING The subject property is located at 36818 8th Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). The subject property is located approximately 1,200 feet (ft) northwest of Interstate 5 (I-5), 1,200 ft southeast of State Route 99 (SR 99), and 11/2 miles northeast of the Port of Tacoma (Figure 1). The subject property contains a farmhouse/residence, a barn, and several wood outbuildings/sheds. The property has been mostly cleared of vegetation and includes a large grass -covered area in the southern and central portions of the property, and areas of low brush and vegetation along the northern portion of the property. 2.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The subject property is characterized by the following (Figure 2): Property boundaries: North: An area of mostly undeveloped land owned by the City is located directly north of the subject property. Parcel number 2921049118, which is approximately 10 acres in size, contains two small ponds and a residence in the northwest corner of the property. Undeveloped land owned by the City is located directly south and east of South and East: the subject property. West: Two parcels are located west of the subject property, across 8th Avenue South. The two parcels and their use or zoned use include parcel 3221049102 (west of the subject property, residential) and parcel 3221049098 (southwest of the subject property, vacant, zoned residential). Property description (acreage, The subject property is located in a residential and undeveloped area of structures, roads, and other south Federal Way, between Pacific Highway South and 1-5. The improvements): elevation of the subject property is between approximately 80 and 105 ft above mean sea level (AMSL). The subject property comprises one tax parcel that is approximately 2.00 acres in size, as discussed in Section 1.0. The majority of the subject property is covered by grass and other vegetation including trees and shrubs. The property contains a residence, a shop, a barn, a small shed, enclosed cistern, and a pump house. Property access: The subject property is accessed from 8th Avenue South, Estimated percentage of property Approximately 5 percent of the subject property is improved with the covered by buildings and/or residence and outbuildings. pavement: Property operations: The subject property is currently in use as a single-family residential property. Type of sewage disposal The subject property is on private septic system. system/provider: Potable water source/provider: Potable water is provided to the subject property from the Lakehaven Utility District. Electricity is provided to the subject property and adjacent properties by Electric utility: Puget Sound Energy. No oil or natural gas services are present at the subject property. Natural gas and oil utilities: 1/20/15 Y:\238\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA —final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2-1 Stormwater management I Rainwater infiltrates on the property, or drains to Hylebos Creek, which facilities: crosses the northern portion of the property. Subject properly features are shown on Figure 3; selected site photographs are provided in Appendix A. 2.2 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY Subject property topography, geology, hydrogeology, and surface water are described below: Topography: The subject property area is within a northeast -southwest trending topographic low with the surrounding land surface sloping up to the north, east, and west. The subject property is located in the low area at an elevation of approximately 80 to 100 ft AMSL. The low area contains three small ponds located to the north and west of the subject property, as well as West Hylebos Creek, which flows to the west through the northern portion of the subject property. The land surface generally slopes down to the east, away from 8"' Avenue South. Geology: The geology of the subject property has been influenced primarily by advancing and retreating glacial ice. During the Pleistocene Epoch (early Quaternary), 2 million to 10,000 years before the present (ybp), vast continental ice sheets advanced into the Puget Sound region. The latest glacial advance, referred to as the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation, occurred between about 22,000 and 13,000 ybp and had the greatest effect on the present day landscape, and resulted in the present day topographic expression of the area and much of the near surface soil deposits. General geologic information for the subject property was obtained from the Geology of the Poverty Bay Quadrangle, Washington (Booth et al. 2004), published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). According to Booth et al., the surface geology consist of wetland deposits associated with West Hylebos Creek in the northeastern corner of the subject property, glacial recessional lacustrine deposits in a strip running from the northwestern corner to the southeastern corner of the subject property and glacial till in the southeast corner of the subject property. Glacial till likely underlies the wetland and recessional lacustrine deposits. Wetland deposits at the subject property are mapped as comprising wet, peat, and alluvium and typically exhibit low to moderate permeability and low shear strength. Glacial recessional lacustrine deposits are mapped as comprising primarily medium stiff to stiff silt and clay and typically exhibiting low permeability and low to moderate shear strength. Glacial till is mapped as rounded gravel, cobbles, and boulders in massive, silt- or sand -rich matrix. Glacial till typically exhibits low permeability and high shear strength, characteristics resulting from compaction by the weight of the overlying glacier. Hydrogeology: Groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property includes a relatively shallow' aquifer likely perched on the underlying glacial till and a deeper aquifer in advance outwash deposits that generally underlie the glacial till. Based on review of available groundwater data for the project vicinity, the groundwater flow in the near -surface aquifer is to the west-northwest toward West Hylebos Creek and groundwater flow in the deeper aquifer in generally to the west toward Puget Sound (Woodward et al. 1995). Floodplain and Surface Based on Federal Emergency Management Administration flood plain zone maps, Water Features: the subject property is not located within a 100- or 500- year flood plain. The subject property is located more than 2,000 ft from the nearest flood plain, which is to the southeast. 1/20/15 YA2361066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2-2 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION A variety of resources were reviewed to develop the history of the subject and adjacent properties and to assess the potential for environmental impact to the subject property. These resources were obtained from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), King County iMAP and GoogleTM Earth Professional and include the following: ■ Aerial photographs (1936 from King County iMAP; 1960, 1969, 1980, and 1990 from Aero- Metric; 2000, 2007 from King County iMAP; and 2013 from Google Earth Professional) ■ Topographic maps from USGS(1900, 1961, 1968, 1973, 1981, and 1994) • City directories (1970, 1975, 1985, 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2008, and 2013). Copies of historical aerial photographs and topographic maps are provided in Appendices B and C, respectively. Landau Associates requested that EDR conduct a search for Sanborn Fire Insurance maps for the subject property; however, no fire insurance map coverage is available for the subject property. A copy of the EDR Sanborn Map report documenting the lack of coverage is included in Appendix D. A copy of the EDR City Directory Image Report is provided in Appendix E. Landau Associates reviewed these resources for the years listed above. Historical aerial photographs and USGS topographic maps were reviewed to help identify prior uses of the subject and adjacent properties that could potentially result in environmental impacts to the subject property. City directories were reviewed to help identify historical businesses and operations associated with the subject and adjacent properties. Note that most of the photographs are relatively high altitude images and, at such a scale, identification of more than large features, such as buildings, is difficult. Historically and/or environmentally significant findings from the aerial photograph, topographic map, and city directory reviews are summarized below: Year s a m ma V a L p ° m 0 OJO - Subject Property Adjacent Properties The topographic map scale is such that buildings and features cannot be 1900 X discerned. Specific features on the adjacent properties The subject property and surrounding cannot be identified. area are shown as part of King County; 8th Ave can be seen in its present location. The properties to the north, east, and south The subject property is developed; the appear to be farmland. 1936 X barn and the farmhouse/residence are The property directly to the west remains visible. forested, but the properties to the north and The property has been partially cleared. the south appear to be developed as farmland or potentially for residential use. 1/20115 Y:\238\066,010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3-1 s ° 2 a y ai �o o U Year ma o Subject Property Adjacent Properties The property to the west appears to have Additional structures are visible on the been developed, possibly as a residential subject property, possibly small sheds or property. outbuildings. A pond is now visible on the property to the 1960 X West Hylebos Creek is visible, crossing west. the subject property south of the northeast corner of the subject property to the The property to the east appears to be no northwest corner of the subject property. longer cleared as farmland, and possibly returning to forest. The subject property is shown containing a residence. 1961 X West Hylebos Creek runs south to the No significant changes to the properties are subject property and cuts west through shown. the northern portion of the subject property No significant changes to the subject Two ponds are shown on the adjacent 1968 X property are shown. properties to the northwest (City property). 1969 X No significant changes to the subject No significant changes to the adjacent property are visible. properties are visible. 1970 X The subject property is not identified. The adjacent properties are not identified. 1973 X No significant changes to the subject No significant changes to the adjacent property are shown. properties are shown. The subject property is identified as 1975 X Larson Boat and/or Engine Sportsmen's The adjacent properties are not identified. Services Center. No significant changes to the subject I No significant changes to the adjacent 1980 X property are visible. properties are visible. 1981 X No significant changes to the subject No significant changes to the adjacent property are shown. properties are shown. 1985 X The subject property is identified as The adjacent properties are not identified. William E Larson. No significant changes to the subject Additional trees are shown throughout the 1990 X property are visible. subject property vicinity, though the adjacent properties show no significant changes. The adjacent property to the west (Carlson 1992 X The subject property is identified as Property) is identified as Robert I Carlson. William E Larson. The adjacent property to the north (City property) is identified as John E Fiedler. 1994 X No significant changes to the subject No significant changes to the adjacent property are shown. properties are shown. The adjacent property to the west (Carlson 1995 X The subject property is identified as Anna Property) is identified as Robert I Carlson. M Larson. The adjacent property to the north (City property) is identified as John E Fiedler. 1/20/15 Y:\238\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3-2 s � a a � " m 0 rn Year `mom O ` IX ,CL " 0 Subject Property Adjacent Properties _ The adjacent property to the west (Carlson The subject property is identified as Ann Property) is identified as Robert Ole. 1999 X Larson. The adjacent property to the north (City property) is identified as John E Engr Fiedler. No significant changes to the subject No significant changes to the adjacent 2000 X property are visible. properties are visible. The adjacent property to the west (Carlson Property) is identified as Robert Carlson. 2003 X The subject property is identified as Mary The adjacent property to the north (City Larson. property) is identified as David Bridges Fiedler.John E Engineer No significant changes to the subject No significant changes to the adjacent 2007 X I F property are visible. properties are visible. The adjacent property to the west (Carlson Property) is identified as Joyce Carlson. 2008 Occupant unknown. The adjacent property to the north (City property) is identified as Jamie Jerome. No significant changes to the adjacent No significant changes to the subject properties are visible. property are visible. The adjacent property to the west (Carlson 2013 X X The subject property is identified as Property) identified as Joyce Carlson. P Y) � is occupant unknown. The adjacent property to the north (City property) is identified as occupant unknown. The operational history of the surrounding properties developed from the information presented in the above table is summarized as follows: • North: The property to the north (City property) has been vacant, undeveloped property containing mixed forested land. Prior to the 1968 (1968 topographic map), a portion of West Hylebos Creek was diverted to create two ponds. ■ South: The property to the south (City property) appears to be farmland as of the 1936 aerial photograph. • East: The adjacent property to the east (City property) appears to be farmland as of the 1936 aerial photograph. The 1960 aerial photograph shows the property as possibly no longer in use as farmland, with trees and/or shrubs visible. • West: The adjacent properties to the west (Carlson and Elias properties) were developed as residential properties prior to 1936 and 1960, respectively. In summary, the subject property has been developed since at least 1936. The property appears virtually unchanged throughout the subject property historical review (historical aerial photographs and topographic maps). The property is identified as Larson Boat and/or Engine Sportsmen's Service Center in the 1975 city directory listing. An interview with Mrs. Margaret Justice, daughter of the current site 1/20115 Y:\238\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3-3 owner, confirmed the historical use of the subject property as a boat engine and motor maintenance and repair shop. Mrs. Justice stated that her father repaired engines from 1964 to 1975; additional information can be found in Section 6.0 of this report. The property is identified in the 1985 city directory as William E Larson. 1/20/15 Y 1238\066 010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final docx LANDAU DISSOCIATES 3-4 4.0 AGENCY RECORDS REVIEW Landau Associates reviewed information from publicly available environmental databases and contacted the King County Public Records for information regarding potential environmental conditions at the subject and adjacent properties. Relevant information collected from the various agencies is summarized below. 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE REPORT EDR was subcontracted to conduct a search (as prescribed by ASTM) of publicly available federal, state, and local agency environmental databases. A regulatory agency database report was obtained from EDR, a complete copy of which is provided in Appendix F. The search focused on information in the various lists maintained by the agencies of sites with known and potential environmental conditions that may represent a threat to human health and the environment. EDR conducted its search of listed information (which is keyed to a geographic mapping system) using the location of the subject property, and identified sites listed in the databases that are located within up to a 1-mile radius of the subject property boundaries. Sites identified in the EDR report were evaluated as described in the database assessment criteria included in Appendix F. Due to the nature of contaminant migration in groundwater, only sites located within '/4 mile and hydraulically upgradient of the subject property, or sites higher than or at equal elevation as the subject property that have activities that may affect groundwater, are assumed to have the potential to environmentally impact the subject property. As noted in Section 2.2, groundwater flow at the subject property is anticipated to be to the west-northwest; therefore, sites located to the east-southeast are potentially upgradient of the subject property. 4.1.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY AND ADJACENT AND PROXIMATE SITES Part of the subject property is listed as being within the National Wetland Inventory Registry, but the subject property was not identified in any of the environmental databases listed in the EDR database report. 4.1.2 ADJACENT AND PROXIMATE SITES The EDR database report identified eight sites within a 1-mile radius of the subject property. These sites are not considered to represent environmental concerns for the subject property, based on groundwater flow direction and their distance from the subject property. 1/20/15 YA238\06R010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 4-1 4.2 KING COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS Landau Associates contacted King County Public Records regarding any permits or records of environmental interest for the subject property or surrounding properties. King County was in the proccss of searching for records responsive to the request at the time of preparation of this report, and indicated that they expected to complete the search by the first half of February 2015. Residential properties are less likely to have relevant records maintained by King County; for example, a UST of the age and size likely located at the subject property may not be recorded. Based on this information, no further insight into property history or uses is expected. 4.3 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Landau Associates reviewed Ecology's Toxics Cleanup Program Web Reporting database for additional information regarding the subject and adjacent properties (Ecology 2014a). The subject property and adjacent properties were not listed. 1/20/15 Y:\238\066 010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 4-2 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION Landau Associates requested that the City provide any information due to actual or specialized knowledge or experience regarding the subject property that is or could be relevant to recognized environmental conditions. Information provided by Mrs. Margaret Justice, daughter of the current owner, Anne Larson, is summarized below (Justice, M. 2014). User Provided Information User Response User Comments Is the user aware of any environmental Yes ❑ No® cleanup liens against the subject property that are filed or recorded under federal, tribal, state, or local law? Is the user aware of any Activity and Use Yes ❑ No® Limitations (AULs), such as engineering controls, land use restrictions, or institutional controls that are in place at the subject property and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal, tribal, state, or local law? Does the user have any specialized Yes ❑ No® knowledge or experience related to the subject property or nearby properties? Does the purchase price being paid for the Yes ❑ No❑ Not applicable. subject property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the subject property? Does the user know the past uses of the Yes ® No❑ Truck farm/sheep, etc. subject property? Does the user know of specific chemicals that Yes ® No[] Two, 50- to 75-year old fuel tanks; one held fuel are present or once were present at the oil for the kitchen stove and was located in front subject property? of the kitchen window, and one was for fueling farm equipment (not sure if it was a buried tank or not). Does the user know of spills or other Yes ❑ No® chemical releases that have taken place at the subject property? Does the user know of any environmental Yes ❑ No® cleanups that have taken place at the subject property? Based on the user's knowledge and Yes ❑ No® experience related to the subject property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the subject property? The presence of two, 50- to 75-year old fuel tanks at the subject property, and the lack of additional information regarding the tanks, is considered a recognized environmental condition for the subject property. The fuel tanks are further discussed in Section 6.0 and 7.0 of this report. 1/20/15 YA236\066 010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA —final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 5-1 6.0 INTERVIEWS Mrs. Margaret Justice, daughter of the current owner of the subject property, Anna Larson (Justice, M. 2015a,b), provided the following information regarding the subject property: • Mrs. Justice indicated that her parents purchased the subject property in 1964; the property was purchased from a family called Loyts-Taylor. Her mother lived in the house until May 2014; Mrs. Justice and her husband lived in a motor home in the front parking area from 2007 to May 2014. The home has been vacant since May 2014; the home has been locked and no evidence of break-ins or tampering has been observed. • Mrs. Justice indicated that her parents and sisters are hoarders; the home was said to be filled to the brim with "junk". • Mrs. Justice indicated that the property was used as an orchard prior to her family's purchase of the subject property. Specifically, the southeast side of the property was an orchard of apples, pears, and cherries. The property contained a small amount of livestock including chickens and at least one pig. The Loyts-Taylor family sold the orchard fruit at local markets and at a farm stand on the property. The majority of the trees were left to die and disintegrate upon her family's purchase of the property in 1964. • Mrs. Justice is unaware of any industrial uses of the subject property, or any indications of environmental concerns related to the subject property due to historical uses. • Mrs. Justice indicated that two fuel storage tanks are located on the subject property. One tank, located below the kitchen window, contained fuel for cooking. The second tank, its exact location unknown, was located to the east of the house, was filled with diesel fuel which was used to fuel farm equipment. • Mrs. Justice indicated that the house was probably plumbed for water in the 1930s. Mrs. Justice indicated that her family had water rights to use water from Hylebos Creek. They used the water from the creek to water plants. • Mrs. Justice is unaware of any wells located on the subject property. ■ Mrs. Justice indicated that her father used the shop to build and repair fishing rods and reels; to her knowledge, he never worked on tackle or lead weights. He also ran a business where he repaired and serviced boat engines from approximately 1964 to 1975. He continued to disassemble and distribute engine parts until his death in 1991. He had a large tank which he would fill with water and run the engine in to check for performance and timing. She was unaware what he had done with the water when the work was complete. • Mrs. Justice indicated that only common household cleaners are currently located on the subject property. • Mrs. Justice indicated that the septic system is located to the northeast of the home; three different drainfields have been used to her knowledge. The locations of the drainfelds are unknown. Based on the use of the subject property as an orchard, prior to 1964, pesticides, including lead arsenate, dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT), and/or herbicides, may have been used at the subject property. Lead arsenate was primarily used in eastern Washington; however, historical use of the pesticide also occurred on orchard land in the Puget Sound region (Landau Associates 2006). Lead 1/20/15 Y:\238\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA —final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 6-1 arsenate pesticides use can result in the presence of elevated concentrations of lead and arsenic in soils. DDT was used as a replacement for lead arsenate beginning in about in 1948 and was commonly used in orchards throughout the state (Ecology website 2014b). The potential use of lead arsenate pesticides, DDT, and other pesticides and/or herbicides is considered a potential environmental concern for the subject property. In addition, the current and historical use of the subject property as a boat engine repair and maintenance facility is considered a potential environmental concern for the subject property. As noted above, the presence of two, 50- to 75- year old fuel tanks at the subject property and the lack of additional information regarding the tanks is considered a recognized environmental condition for the subject property. 1/20/15 Y:\238\066 010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA —final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 6-2 7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE On January 5, 2015, Jessica Stone and Sierra Mott of Landau Associates conducted a reconnaissance of the subject property and adjacent properties to assess current land use and environmental conditions. Mrs. Margaret Justice, daughter of the current property owner, accompanied Ms. Stone and Ms. Mott for a portion of the visit. The focus of the reconnaissance was to identify conditions with the potential to pose an environmental liability to a property owner or operator. Observations made during the reconnaissance are discussed below and selected site photographs are provided in Appendix A. Features on the subject and adjacent properties are shown on Figure 3. 7.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY Landau Associates used the following methodology to observe the subject property: • Traversed open spaces within the boundaries of the subject property Walked around the perimeter/boundaries of the subject property ■ Walked through the interior of buildings (excepting the residence) on the subject property. Landau Associates made the following observations during the site reconnaissance: Issue Comments Hazardous materials or petroleum products: Multiple containers of common household cleaners and fluids were observed: insect killer, oil -based paint, and cleaners. These fluids were observed throughout the inspected buildings and piled up on the south side of the home. None observed. Hazardous waste: Solid waste: The buildings located throughout the subject property all contained solid waste including construction debris and common household waste. Wells: None observed. Wastewater: Wastewater is contained within the private septic system. Drains, sumps, and drywells: None observed. Evidence of dumping or fill materials: Evidence of household solid waste was observed throughout the subject property. None observed. None observed. Odors: Pools of liquid: PCB -containing equipment: None observed. Stormwater: Stormwater infiltrates on the property, or drains to the north toward West Hylebos Creek. Pits, ponds, or lagoons (subject property): None observed. Pits, ponds, lagoons (adjoining properties): Two ponds are located on the adjacent property to the north. 1/20/15 Y:\236\066010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA —final docx LANDAU AssocIATES 7-1 Issue Comments Stained soil or pavement: None observed. Stressed vegetation: None observed. The subject property contains six structures: the residence, an enclosed cistern, a small shed called "the shop", a barn, a small Buildings: shed called "the apple shed", and a pump house. The residence is currently vacant. The subject property has not been maintained and is in generally poor condition. The exterior of the residence appeared to be in poor condition, General exterior housekeeping/yardkeeping: the barn roof has collapsed, and the barn and the sheds were observed to be full of junk and trash. The yard was overgrown, with trash and junk observed in various locations. Electrical transformers None observed. 7.1.1 STORAGE TANKS/STRUCTURES Landau Associates assessed the subject property for evidence of current or former underground storage tanks (USTs) and aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) including visual evidence such as fill ports, vent pipes, fuel pumps/dispensers, concrete pads, tank saddles, and mounts and noted the following, which concurred with Section 5.0 and 6.0 above: Current USTs or ASTs: One UST is located outside the kitchen window of the residence; the top and vent pipe were visible under tables and trash/junk. The UST is reported to be made of concrete and was used to hold fuel for the kitchen stove (Justice, M. 2014, 2015a). Former USTs or ASTs: An AST and/or a UST is located to the east of the home (Justice, M. 2014, 2015a). The tank was used to hold diesel fuel to fill the farm equipment. A regulator gauge (labeled Standard Oil) is located adjacent to the west side of the enclosed cistern and may be associated with this AST/UST. 7.1.2 DE MINIMIS CONDITIONS ASTM defines de minimis conditions as those that "generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies" (i.e., minor soil staining). No de minimis conditions were identified at the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 7.2 SURROUNDING AREA Landau Associates observed adjacent properties from the subject property or from the subject property. No evidence of recognized environmental conditions or potential environmental concerns for 1/20/15 Y:\238\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final,docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 7-2 the subject property was observed on the adjacent properties. The following is a list of features of the adjacent properties (Figure 2): • North: City -owned undeveloped land is located directly north of the subject property. • South: Cleared land belonging to the City is located to the south of the subject property. • East: City -owned undeveloped land is located directly east of the subject property. • West: Two residential properties are located to the west of the subject property, the Carlson Property and the Elias Property. 1120/15 Y12361066.010MLarson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_fnal.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 7-3 8.0 WETLAND AND STREAM BOUNDARY VERIFICATION Previously mapped wetland and stream boundaries at the subject property were verified during the site reconnaissance conducted on January 5, 2015. As noted above, a wetland investigation was initially conducted in April and May 2010 at the subject property and at adjacent properties. The 2010 investigation identified a large wetland complex (Wetland A) associated with West Hylebos Creek (Landau Associates 2010). Wetland delineation boundary flagging from the 2010 investigation was still present during the site reconnaissance. As observed in 2010, the wetland boundary follows the toe of the slope located along the northern end of the subject property. The main channel of West Hylebos Creek flows east to west through the northeast corner of the subject property. Wetland and stream boundaries do not appear to have changed since the 2010 investigation. 1/20/15 YA238\066 010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU AssocIATES 8-1 9.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Landau Associates has conducted a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13 for the subject property located at 36818 8'11 Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington, which is identified by parcel number 2921049118. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.0 of this report. This assessment did not identify any controlled recognized environmental conditions, or historical recognized environmental conditions for the subject property. The assessment has identified the following recognized environmental condition for the subject property: At least one, and possibly two, USTs are located on the subject property. The daughter, Mrs. Margaret Justice, of the current owner, Anna Larson, indicated that the USTs have been in place approximately 50 to 75 years (Justice, M. 2014, 2015a). The kitchen UST is located just below the kitchen window (on the north side of the subject property residence). It is reported to be made of concrete and was used to hold fuel for the kitchen appliances. The second tank was either an AST, which has been removed (no ASTs were observed during the site reconnaissance), or a UST, which is likely still on the property. This may have been located to the east of the subject property residence. The second tank held diesel fuel to fuel the farm equipment. Due to the age of the tanks and lack of additional information regarding their current condition (and presence or absence), the tanks are considered a recognized environmental condition for the subject property. This assessment has also identified the following potential environmental concerns for the subject property: • The subject property was used as a fruit orchard until 1964 (Justice, M. 2014, 2015a). The residence was built in 1900 (King County website 2014) and the fruit orchard may have been existence since that time. The orchards were primarily located along the southeastern portion of the property. Fruit orchards in the 1920s and 1930s commonly used lead arsenate pesticides, which can result in elevated concentrations of lead and arsenic in shallow soil (Landau Associates 2006). In the late 1940s, the use of DDT pesticide replaced the use of lead arsenate in many areas (Ecology website 2014b). The possible use of lead arsenate, DDT, other pesticides, and herbicides at the subject property, and the potential impact to soil or groundwater, is considered a potential environmental concern for the subject property. • The subject property (shop building) was used as a boat engine and motor repair shop (Larson Boat and/or Engine Sportsmen's Service Center) from 1964 to approximately 1975 (Justice, M. 2015b). The owner of the business continued to disassemble and distribute boat engine parts until his death in 1991. There is no indication that any environmental impact has occurred due to these activities on the subject property, but due to the nature of the potential contaminants associated with these activities, the history of repair and maintenance activities is considered a potential environmental concern for the subject property. The other significant findings of this assessment include: • The subject property is located in Federal Way, Washington located approximately 1,200 ft northwest of I-5, 1,200 ft southeast of SR 99, and 1'/z miles northeast of the Port of Tacoma 1/20/15 YA238\066.010\MLarson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 9-1 ■ Shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is anticipated to flow to the west- northwest toward West Hylebos Creek. • The subject property is not listed in any environmental databases and no listed offsite properties are considered to represent environmental concerns for the subject property. • Stained soil was not observed on the subject property. ■ There are no wells at the subject property. • The subject property is on a private septic system; the septic system is located along the northeast corner of the home and up to three drainfields are at locations unknown. • No polychlorinated biphenyl -containing material was observed on the subject property. 9.1 DATA GAPS follows: The data gap identified during our assessment and its potential impact on our findings is as • Chain -of -Title Documentation. No chain -of -title report for the subject property was provided for review by the City. Property ownership information summarized in this report is based on an interview with the current owner's daughter, Mrs. Justice, and indicates that the subject property has been owned by her family since 1964 and that no environmental liens have been made. Based on this information, this data gap is not considered significant. • King County Public Records. King County Public Records was contacted to provide any records related to the subject property or adjacent properties. These records could include information regarding environmental enforcement activities, septic system records, records of wells, USTs, or solid waste records. King County Public Records had not completed their search at the time of preparation of this report. As discussed in Section 4.2, this data gap is not considered significant. • Subject Property Access. The subject property home was not available for entrance of the time of the site walk. The home is full of trash and junk, but reportedly contains no items of potential environmental concern other than common household cleaners (Justice, M. 2015a). Based on this information, this data gap is not considered significant. 9.2 OPINION The subject property has been developed since 1900. The property was used partially as a fruit orchard until approximately 1964. One UST, and one UST or AST were installed at the property prior to 1964. The one confirmed UST held fuel for the home's kitchen appliances. The second unconfirmed AST/UST held diesel fuel for the farm equipment. The current owner, the Larson family, purchased the home in 1964. William Larson ran a business servicing and maintaining boat engines until 1975; continued to disassemble and distribute parts until 1991. The presence of fuel storage tanks at the subject property is considered a recognized environmental condition for the subject property. The operations that have historically been conducted at the subject property, including a fruit orchard and engine repair shop, are considered potential environmental concerns for the subject property. 1/20/15 YA238\066 010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 9-2 There have been no documented releases from the tanks; however, the condition of the tanks and quantity of any residual product within the tanks is not known. The tanks should be decommissioned by removal in accordance with applicable regulations and the quality of the surrounding soils should be evaluated to assess potential liabilities for the City. Additionally, the sampling of soil and groundwater is recommended in the following areas to evaluate and document potential impacts from historical site operation and to establish current baseline conditions: • In the area of historical fruit orchards where use of pesticides or herbicides could have contaminated surface soil • Adjacent to the shop, where the historical presence of a boat motor and engine maintenance shop. If staining or other evidence of potential contamination is observed during future construction or redevelopment of the subject property, procedures should be in place for sampling and analysis of the impacted soil to evaluate appropriate handling and disposal practices. 1/20/15 YA238\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 9-3 10.0 USE OF THIS REPORT This Phase I ESA was undertaken and this report prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Federal Way and its legal representatives (authorized users) for specific application to the subject property. It is intended to provide the authorized users with an understanding of the potential environmental liabilities associated with the property evaluated in this report. Reliance on this report by third parties or others who do not have a contractual relationship with Landau Associates on this project is at the sole risk of the third parties or others. This report is based on observations and information obtained during one visit to the subject property and is based solely on the condition of the property on that day, supplemented with information obtained by Landau Associates and described herein. In evaluating the subject property, Landau Associates has relied in good faith on representations and information abstracted from sources noted in this report to the extent that they have not been contradicted by observations during the site reconnaissance or data obtained from other sources. Accordingly, Landau Associates accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatements, omissions, or misrepresentations in the information provided to us. Determining whether environmental conditions defined in this report indicate the presence of contamination at levels of concern is a matter of judgment. Liabilities associated with contaminated sites are defined in part by CERCLA. The findings and conclusions of this report are based on our evaluation of information obtained and reviewed for this project and reflect our professional judgment with respect to that information. Landau Associates has performed the services and made the findings in accordance with generally accepted practices for Phase I ESAs in effect in Washington at the time the services were performed. The scope of services for this Phase I ESA was defined in our proposal and, unless specifically included in our scope of services and in this report, this Phase I ESA did not include services related to asbestos, radon, lead paint, lead in drinking water, wetlands, or indoor air quality or vapor intrusion issues (including the potential presence of mold or other biological contaminants). This warranty stands in lieu of all other warranties, express or implied. While this report can be used as a guide, it is neither a rejection nor an endorsement of the property. It must also be understood that changing circumstances in the environment and use of the property can alter the conclusions and findings contained in this report. 1/20/15 YA236\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA —final docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 10-1 10.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of F,nvironmenlal Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 Code of Federal Regulations 312, and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquires in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312 and ASTM E 1527-13. Qualifications of the environmental professionals responsible for the site reconnaissance and generation of this report are provided in Appendix G. This document has been prepared under the supervision and direction of the following key staff. LANDAU ASSOCIATES, INC. Timothy L. Syverson, L.G. Senior Associate Geologist In addition, the following staff contributed to the preparation of this report. Jessica C. Stone enior Scientist XieM tt Staff Scientist SMM/JCS/TLS/jrc 1/20115 YA235\066.01MMI-arson Ph I ESAlarson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 10-2 11.0 REFERENCES Booth, D.B., Waldron, H.H., and Troost, K.G. 2004. Geologic Map of the Poverty Bay 7.5' Quadrangle, King and Pierce Counties, Washington. U.S. Geological Survey, scale 1:24,000. Ecology website. 2014a. Toxics Cleanup Program Web Reporting. hitps:Ilfortress.wa. ov/ecv/tcpwebreportirzgh•eJaorl. Wx. Washington State Department of Ecology. Accessed December 15. Ecology website. 2014b. Water Quality Improvement Project, Wenatchee River Area: DDT. http:l/www.ecy.wa.gov/pro ra�q/tmdl/WenatcheeMulti/DDT.html. Washington State Department of Ecology. Accessed January 6, 2015. Justice, Margaret. 2014a. Phase I Real Estate Transfer Assessment / Environmental Site Assessment User Provided Information Request Form. December 2014. Justice, Margaret. 2015a. Personal Communication: Larson Property Historical Uses. In -Person Interview with Jessica Stone and Sierra Mott, Landau Associates. January 5. Justice, Margaret. 2015b. Personal Communication: Larson Property Historical Uses, Specifically Boat Motor and Engine Repair. Phone Interview with Sierra Mott, Landau Associates. January 6. King County website. 2014. King County iMAP- Property Information. h ://www5.kin coup .gov/iMAP/viewer.htm?mal?set--kel2rol2edy. Accessed December 15. Landau Associates. 2010. Technical Memorandum: Wetland and Stream Investigation and Delineation, Enticknap and Bridges Properties, Federal Way, Washington. Prepared for the City of Federal Way. August 3. Landau Associates. 2006. Technical Memorandum: Arsenic and Lead Mobility in Area -wide Contamination -Impacted Soil. Prepared for Washington State Department of Ecology. September 14. Woodward, D.G., F.A. Packard, N.P. Dion, and S.S. Sumioka. 1995. Occurrence and Quality of Ground Water in Southwestern King County, Washington. Water -Resources Investigation Report 92-4098. U.S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geologic Society. 1/20/15 YA236\066.010\R\Larson Ph I ESA\Larson Property Phase I ESA_final.docx LANDAU ASSOCIATES 11-1 I Panther Park / 4s Dr ro 6 gg �. N/es[ �}y7etZas Cr ek I `�' ss8thst- Lakeland South 9 y Z'1�Gt e� N . Enchanted Park Jjtst Project Locationr o ' Gethsemane h 5fl9 if eCe metery Heights 1' �1 yYlof ef, 1 Cie n`r 1 j HYledos � 1 l C"" I! l 4-E P Rf Or - -way, -ARittarr- Way. Q Project Everett Location N 0 0.5 1 1 Seattle • Federal Wa Spokane Tat- U ❑ I } rnpV� Miles Washington Data Source: King County GIS; Esri 2012 Larson Property Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington Vicinity Map �I ASSOCIATES I •V4 p C U @ � NN t �N . a) I L rM11 � C (0 � N d O +� d O N O U C 7 - N -0 U L L N 44nog enuDAV 43Z6 cu I - m u o U C 70 0 coO `N a Cl) a Fm �oC) ca ao E 0 -0LL N a a)O CNl) U) LL N T a n W 11 CL t _ O` 7 L - a a 0 a`) (n c r c a ccu O N � M 0) c i Y M U a w ca v OL v J � I � a ) o� O a)L _f6 N V7 U- �� N Z o 04 � w m CL 3 y C C1 y O N C) w N m U N M o Z L Q j L� C n y�h0 Cl) N s � U y A U) ygf E C f0 1 N V � I n L _ N N N /J EL 1 + r N Q 0 C Q j. N U d :/] 3 _0 N ,� Q u) Q F- U o _ Don I 0 s N } r- p, IL West Hy/ebos Creek Approximate Location of Pump House \ ♦ f ♦ jj Approximate Location k o of Farm Fuel UST/AST. ♦ y SewerAccess;� 7 = � c d Home $ Enclosed co �' Cistern Carlson Property 3221049102 Kitchen Fuel UST Shop 1 Shed 1 1 Apple / Shed I r Barn Elias Property WVL� 3221049098 '} Legend Q Subject Property Wetland Boundary Tax Parcels — Wetland 200-ft Buffer 0 Building Outlines Historical Fruit Orchards Data Source: Esri World Imagery. Larson Property LANDAU Federal Way, Washington ASSOCIATES of Federal Way 3221049141 Note 1. Black and white reproduction of this color Streams original may reduce its effectiveness and lead to incorrect interpretation. 0 80 160 Scale in Feet Figure Subject Property 3 Z 0 I 0 �aQ % w C'Zd r 0 J W go W LL U �3 r 2 A•� N C La C W a H � y C Q u C 0 c as C d d E c W w ra a w a a LL c L L IL a7 C O .y 41 O- a` m r c m T O Q O COa O p, a W fN N O O a) CL p 7 N O w O" v O m 0 c CL O N U) 0 c y d m a7 W Q `y v l O O O 0 i a m a N a N a N Yn An An N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 L % m `as m m `m as m i n a a a • � m � d j a a a a 1 w w — w i o 0 0 0 E E E E n a> a) m m 1 ` m m m m a v v v > > > ` U U U U 1 j O O O O j 0) A N N 0 0 1 0 6 w Of v a v m m d U U U 0 0 0 O "O O O -O 'O N N N N CO 0 O f0 0 0 d' d' i 0 f 0 U Z Z Z 'Coo O n O n Yn CL O C m `n c C O co U d O C E O U m c 0 0 •N a 3 m a) d 7 N N O N U a Y U a d Y N aa) � E as C m a "00 L N m a� L J J ;n CoCV of § E E J 2 ] g § / L) f he k 0 o Cl) w CJ 7 z CM� La ■\ 2 E 2 E CL CL L k E CD ) i f 4 ) ƒ ; § w ) D 0 q § � ■ 2 § k © — / \ i \ k } § f \ ) k 4 cm :E k CO/ I - m N § n n n n 4 4 4 4 ) / o 0 § 7 2 t k D § D k � § Q ] A cc c ] ] 0 0 — k # $ k im ) »tm oLB ; f %f In 2 g @ ■ »$_«)n2 z \ / _g 0 § 8 �o LL o n e o _ 0 2 mcc \ S 0 k \ ) j $ E ca \ .§ � K k . § E a c § © E C K co�k § � { E oUov E & CL 0 Sf$Iƒa _ ; 3 02f■R ) i / x � M O L Cl) H a) rn m (L V- r J E C m E E 0 U a U) a W u _ u d U) 'C L � a ° = u C � 0 a) 4 N LL V- g 0 a as �3 n N L LU 4 N c a: av a� — C � d E c' d W Wa W q _ a N FL c ai cn c 0 U w 0 6 C a) O v c a) c E a7 C 0 N a) 0 E a < IA cu a) O C @ c a o E 0 N O W y m c O v g a _d m l6 �p C a) v a) c a) E a`�i '-' o O 0 f° Ca .O+ w > a) c O N p 12 Fn W Q 0 0 ai v m 0 a'ai 0 ai a�i o U U U CO a v a '00 O 0 ca0 0 O O O l0 O O 4 Z Z Z o M c O .6 a) U) O f0 O C_ E ca c 0 a) O Y U L f0 O O a) a) a) = a) ca 3 w c Na N O U c m 0 f0 a Y c > O >, — c a) m a m U a L E m as 2 E rn C U a� O. V E N a) a) N 0 O a C C W cn 0 U U APPENDIX A Selected Site Photographs 1. Looking southeast at subject property residence. 2. Looking north at subject property residence. Larson Property Figure 14 LANDAU Federal Way, Washington Selected Site Photographs n _1 ASSOCIATES /-1 3. Looking east-southeast at enclosed cistern. i ML i a. i w 4. Looking northwest at subject property barn. Larson Property Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington Selected Site Photographs n ASSOCIATES /`1 5. Looking northwest at subject property pump house. 6. Interior of subject property pump house. Larson Property Selected Site Photographs Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington1A A'3 ASSOCIATES 7. Looking northwest at subject property shop. 8. Interior of subject property shop. Larson Property Selected Site Photographs Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington1A �_� ASSOCIATES 9. Looking east at fuel gauge locker, adjacent to the west side of the enclosed cistern. 10. Interior of fuel gauge locker. Larson Property Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington Selected Site Photographs q _5 ASSOCIATES /`� t2 11. Looking north at the south side of the subject property residence; kitchen UST port/vent is located between the two wooden benches. 12. Kitchen UST port/vent. Larson Property Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington Selected Site Photographs _c ASSOCIATES A V 13. Looking southeast at subject property shop and southern property boundary (first wooden fence). 14. Looking east-northeast at subject property apple shed. Larson Property Figure 14LANDAU Federal way, Washington Selected Site Photographs n _7 ASSOCIATES !-� / 15. Looking east at southeast corner of the subject property and existing wetland boundary flagging. 16. Looking northeast at eastern subject property boundary and existing wetland boundary flagging. Larson Property Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington Selected Site Photographs Q 1A ASSOCIATES A'V 17. Looking northeast at subject property boundary and adjacent property to the east (City property). 18. Looking north from subject property boundary at ponds at adjacent property to the north (City property). Larson Property Selected Site PhotographsFigure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington n `9 ASSOCIATES !-1 APPENDIX B Historical Aerial Photographs Source: King County MAP Larson Property Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington 1936 Aerial Photograph 14 ASSOCIATES B 1 LANDAU 14 ASSOCIATES Source: Aero-Metric Larson Property 1960 Aerial Photograph Federal Way, Washington A SI o: L_" 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES y } 4 • �.1. - 1 � :Qr-• ni. Source: Aero-Metric Larson Property 1969 Aerial Photograph Figure Federal Way, Washington B_3 - f• X trlc/ Seattle �. Larson Property Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington 1980 Aerial Photograph /� 14 ASSOCIATES B-4 CO - .or 4t. 446 L 6'0 jr' Ir - ME � _ .� � , i, .� sue- 1,6 Source: Aero-Metric Larson Property 1990 Aerial Photograph LANDAU Federal Way, Washington 14 ASSOCINYES I I Figure B-5 Source: King County MAP Larson Property Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington 2000 Aerial Photograph 14 ASSOCIATES B 6 N a tx yip �z +. _ Y 14 dw Ole ae �IL t•" + * r \ • ly.� ��tw��• � � — �� a �� �. �c� . w IP ■ i ■ � .' , 'wjow '• ' s 0. r` FL fir '^racitt f EIn:I:r:L+, y ?il fl i rninr Ar.r'p i Mir frr !'I dill] l _ 5,"57 rn11H JaMl irl lrr,:J,:a. I' in`I I ae �ae•ifiw •a:i�:'.� Ca.-y. irc."az st✓� C7..dla ri,r ii. a ar y.a.aa■.ti it A .-ai.rC.:a. Pay r ._.rf : �� �•� aseeeeivas, u �sa.� T W� rf. e+� ■..6+.tl1 •a�AY•T. lu•a.�..,ca. �'e� a, �..:. m..�.r.i ray,.#•wetiaaLw+.a� f. �c� r..ri y [ai La 6 •aI�: L'. ieJ e1.•�w is L; Lrl , .a4. rA'P. Che y..w hates � � : hry eaLr ..e aei"— v Ca --aa •i I eem :f King uY .7f ■aL-m r�:dd�ire.'�`,.—asu.i�aFtr■L L7 .�R.�aw=•-yr_i=F'St:ssAa J L'e� YYd� liar•: eryi 4a.•l! Ilh\44' . •• udr � wa `.aim •i�.la:� -er •a yd7e3fiRP i Source: King County MAP Larson Property 2007 Aerial Photograph LANDAU Federal Way, Washington 14 ASSOCIATES Figure B-7 L. -Vdk' il, t Q s C,4 -T '7 q4li-S i e R e.; "II �� {r#� APPENDIX C Environmental Data Resources Historical Topographic Map Report Enticknap Property 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Inquiry Number: 2530774.8 July 01, 2009 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, CT 06461 rEDKO Environmental Data Resources Inc 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided In this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only. and are not intended to provide, nor should the be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2009 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Historical Topographic Map obinson N. Il _ r - j,il - . ,.!Pinar,•' .. -- -_ $r1.�r::_: ' i ' ',1 Cl Ap r� Pr.Brn+r i AY '' �• c� �� :� _-=- _-�= fib'-- ,• - 1 {+; -�%l. "f ��:.�,rt, �; l�`;� � S } la - \.:• •y '"i� lit '-r ? � .. .'; 'r.. . I . � r} - - ��� •'� � ��`.� L�M1 , � ' YS�f 49� `�� c-kri• R�f'�'r'�r � ILA KJ. •117, ili ' S . ' 1 �• .--.:� � ��. �'� =� �..+ ��1 TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Enticknap Property CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc N NAME: Tacoma, WA ADDRESS: 8th Avenue South CONTACT: Jessica Stone MAP YEAR: 1900 Federal Way, WA 98003 INQUIRY#: 2530774.8 LAT/LONG: 47.2708 / 122.322 RESEARCH DATE: 07/01/2009 SERIES: 30 SCALE: 1:125,000 Historical Topographic Map .'s � . i • -�erH. .rook I l \ ai ook Luke P*eland29 ' 28 • r N - f i •.� r , Mu �J• J� •" •� 1 LI' i 46. { 77 KX L l , _ ,z56 p ;n Lu +� tip`' �•. �� �! —• i ... 5 .Y`!;= • q; .�1 dui . �+ • •I J •9 ,I. • I •20• FLlE� MI.. (PUYALLUP) 17'30/' TAGO41A 6.5 M/ 1� PL/YFILLLI F' Survey SCALE 1.24000 r TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Enticknap Property CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc N NAME: Poverty Bay, WA ADDRESS: 8th Avenue South CONTACT: Jessica Stone MAP YEAR: 1961 Federal Way, WA 98003 INQUIRY#: 2530774.8 LAT/LONG: 47.2708 / 122.322 RESEARCH DATE: 07/01/2009 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24,000 Historical Topographic Map Panther Like Sch •tom �^I �, I �r 1 zSe s .l•• a sr� 'r ,h 1' 1 iF1 n �j gook • ake _ W 5�SB.�Ga •[' + �. it ,r ,• .� l } .I • •`• •1. � � •III 1 t. 28 • - •� Z� 1 __ _ L ,y :t.. Ti. - Fife r ff� 1, 4; d hI 1 ::�:i .� ._ : �'il'Ij�ttS,r` I." ,t•{ _ij ,+ I't ,+. 11;.,. N All. f-I.rarrr• 'sr• lair, r4 -BeacofL r' •.Wa tei .jlr • j •20" Frr( f HI. ' PUYA L L O PI S53 l 7' 30" + TACOMA 6.5 M) 1578 111 NF y "L+r,ai,- TARGET QUAD N NAME: Poverty Bay, WA MAP YEAR: 1968 PHOTOREVISED FROM:1961 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24,000 SITE NAME: Enticknap Property ADDRESS: 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 LAT/LONG: 47.2708 / 122.322 CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc CONTACT: Jessica Stone INQUIRY#: 2530774.8 RESEARCH DATE: 07/01/2009 Historical Topographic Map �. •Cy I' �ch .�.., � C . ,jr `� .. � _ rook 'I I � r I �'. +� , , I � 1 •'I- I / . , •� � � � B ail' I ''ti � 1 ' �rzke 1 � � I � � •� �, 'iki,� ♦ II } i w. .. ,c ., C� • �' '� } t 1� .�; . - ,yak, �� , Of 'i � ,° ••r � 'mil a `� 1� {'. 'l�l •' J. 1�:r _l 1I't: i LC1'J3' - .I'.Walei 'I,i �.' '•50 i;,1+20, 1+ E i rtr If (P(/VAL,LUP) 553 17'30"� '"COMA n mo ;�.- ,` pt�YA!-R Cal Survev SCALE 1-24000 TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Enticknap Property CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc N TNAME: Poverty Bay, WA ADDRESS: 8th Avenue South CONTACT: Jessica Stone MAP YEAR: 1973 Federal Way, WA 98003 INQUIRY#: 2530774,8 PHOTOREVISED FROM:1961 LAT/LONG: 47.2708 / 122.322 RESEARCH DATE: 07/01/2009 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24,000 Historical Topographic Map rj JL j ACT N `� {: � � . j I +.•' 1 any - >. Hn�ru' ,i' '• T slier ;.�� I'.•' ! ,. �.. � ref � � is :• Fifes +, �wlr�e.l��,. .�i':H�i�1'l�.q`:� i � • � , � y :li � � I '�'II;�s`:i• .� � � + `li. s Ili; - ��n ! �y. �. •+ � ... ��`Y l�� •• . 11�� OTH- 550 •20' : --- (POYAL c UP) — 153 j — 1 T30" I S 7R Ill N F I Survey SCALE 1:24000 TARGET QUAD N NAME: Poverty Bay, WA MAP YEAR: 1981 PHOTOREVISED FROM:1961 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24,000 SITE NAME: Enticknap Property ADDRESS: 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 LAT/LONG: 47.2708 / 122.322 CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc CONTACT: Jessica Stone INQUIRY#: 2530774.8 RESEARCH DATE: 07/01/2009 Historical Topographic Map TARGET QUAD SITE NAME: Enticknap Property CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc N NAME: Poverty Bay, WA ADDRESS: 8th Avenue South CONTACT: Jessica Stone MAP YEAR: 1994 Federal Way, WA 98003 INQUIRY#: 2530774.8 REVISED FROM:1961 LAT/LONG: 47.2708 / 122.322 RESEARCH DATE: 07/01/2009 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24,000 APPENDIX D Environmental Data Resources Certified Sanborn Map Report Larson Property 36818 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 Inquiry Number: 4165293.3 December 19, 2014 6 Armstrong Road. 41h floor Kelton, Connee.klcut 0-6484 (rEDR Tall Free: aoo.3:52_00H www.edgnat.com. Certified Sanborn® Map Report 12/19/14 Site Name: Client Name: Larson Property Landau Associates Inc 36818 8th Ave S 950 Pacific Ave Federal Way, WA 98003 Tacoma, WA 98402 EDR EDR Inquiry # 4165293.3 Contact: Sierra Mott The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Landau Associates Inc were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Site Name: Larson Property Address: 36818 8th Ave S City, State, Zip: Federal Way, WA 98003 Cross Street: P.O. # 238XXX.XXX.XXX Project: Larson Property Phase I ESA Certification # FD16-46EO-9947 UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings Library, LLC collection have been searched supplied target property information, and fire covering the target property were not found. Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Certification # FD16-46EO-9947 The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track of the Sanborn historical property usage in approximately 12,000 based on client American cities and towns. Collections searched: insurance maps I✓Library of Congress I✓ University Publications of America I✓ EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866- Landau Associates Inc (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 4165293 - 3 page 2 APPENDIX E Environmental Data Resources city Directory Image Report Larson Property 36818 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 Inquiry Number: 4165293.4 December 24, 2014 L 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 (rEDKOEnvironmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images TABLE OF CONTENTS Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2013 Q Q Cole Information Services 2008 Q Q Cole Information Services 2003 21 Cole Information Services 1999 Q Cole Information Services 1995 Q Cole Information Services 1992 Q Q Cole Information Services 1985 Q Cole Criss -Cross Directory 1975 Q Cole Criss -Cross Directory 1970 Cole Criss -Cross Directory RECORD SOURCES EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. 4165293-4 Page 1 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 36818 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 AM CD Image Source 8TH AVE S 2013 pg Al Cole Information Services 2008 pg A3 Cole Information Services 2003 pg A5 Cole Information Services 1999 pg A7 Cole Information Services 1995 pg A9 Cole Information Services 1992 pg All Cole Information Services 1985 pg A13 Cole Criss -Cross Directory 1975 pg A14 Cole Criss -Cross Directory 1970 pg A15 Cole Criss -Cross Directory 4165293- 4 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS Year DC Image Source S 371 ST ST 2013 pg. A2 Cole Information Services 2008 pg. A4 Cole Information Services 2003 pg. A6 Cole Information Services 1999 pg. A8 Cole Information Services 1995 pg. Al Cole Information Services 1992 pg. Al2 Cole Information Services 1985 - Cole Criss -Cross Directory 1975 Cole Criss -Cross Directory 1970 - Cole Criss -Cross Directory Street not listed in Source Street not listed in Source Street not listed in Source 4165293-4 Page 3 City Directory Images FI 8TH AVE S 2013 Cole Information Services 36612 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 36818 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 36825 JOYCE CARLSON 36905 DONALD ELIAS 36930 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 37007 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 37022 RICHARD LOWE 37024 ELIZABETH KRUGER 37025 ELAINE HARRINGTON 37029 FRA DEAN 37031 THEODORE BINDER 37128 KEITH CLARNO 37131 LOCKSMITH ASAP 37211 ENIO ELTRICH 37222 JASON MUIR 37227 JOHN LANE 37303 ASHLEY WESTLUND 37325 TONY ROORDA 37515 KOREAN AMER CALVARY 4165293.4 Page: Al ✓ Cole Information Services S 371 ST ST 2013 2112 ANDREAS RAAS 2115 DOUGLAS OLSON 2116 THOMAS NIPERT 2119 SERGEY FILOVETS 2122 BENJAMIN SANDERS 2403 JUAN RAMIREZ 2406 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2407 PATRICIA PILEGE 2411 MARGOT OLEARY 2412 CORY ANDERSEN 2417 KATHLEEN WISE 2418 ERIC ADKINSON 2423 SHERRI WHITLOW 2424 STELLA LONGAN 2429 KENNETH FOWLER 2430 ROBERT MARTIN 2505 MARION PEARSON 2510 FRANK MCGARRY 2511 KILLARNEY WOODS MOBILE HOME & SALES WOODS KILLARNEY 2516 HILDA DEGRAAFF 2522 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2523 JENNY RICH 2528 PAUL KILLEN 2529 JENNIFER RIDDLE 2534 JOHN TALLEY 2535 PATRICK NASH 2705 DONALD HENNING 2706 DAVID ANDERSON 2709 JULIE PILLO 2710 SHARRON SCHOLZEN 2716 MARGUERITE CONDON 2717 CHARLOTTE SAUM 2722 PATRICIA ROBERTS 2728 CAREN WARREN 2734 EDITH MORTENSEN 4165293.4 Page: A2 8TH AVE S 2008 Cole Information Services 36612 JAMIE JEROME 36818 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 36825 JOYCE CARLSON 36905 DONALD ELIAS 36930 HYLAND CABINETWORKS INC TIMOTHY HYLAND 37007 JOSEPH SHRADER SHRADER ROCKERIES 37022 GLENNA WINTER 37024 ELIZABETH KRUGER 37025 ELAINE HARRINGTON 37029 VINCENT VASQUES 37031 THEODORE BINDER 37131 CLARENCE LUNDEN RJL CONSTRUCTION INC 37211 CHRISTOPHER ELTRICH 37227 JOHN LANE 37303 ALLEN BERG 37325 PATRICE JUSTICE 4165293.4 Page: A3 ✓ Cole Information Services S 371 ST ST 2008 2112 ANDREAS RAAS 2115 DOUGLAS OLSON 2116 THOMAS NIPERT 2119 FSP SIDING SERGEY FILOVETS 2122 BERNIE SANDERS 2402 JOHN OLEARY 2403 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2407 MARK MORRIS 2411 M OLEARY 2412 GBL ENTERPRISES GLENN ANDERSON 2417 SHARI HAHN 2418 LORI ROSHONG 2423 SHERRI WHITLOW 2424 STELLA LONGAN 2429 KENNETH FOWLER 2430 KAREN MARTIN 2504 KILLARNEY WOODS MOBILE HOME & SALES RALPH TOLMAN 2505 MARION PEARSON 2510 BRENDA SMITH 2511 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2516 HUCKLEBERRY SHED CO ROBERT DEGRAAFF 2517 DIANE YEATS 2522 STEVE WALKER WILLIAM FAIR 2523 CHARI BIRKLID DIANE TOWNSEND 2528 KELLY ROBINSON 2534 JOHN TALLEY 2705 DONALD HENNING 2706 JIM ANDERSON 2709 LORRAINE YOUNGCHILD 2710 MARIAN HORNSBY 2716 MARGUERITE CONDON 2717 CHARLOTTE SAUM 2722 PATRICIA ROBERTS 2728 CAREN STALEY 2734 PETER NORTENSON 4165293.4 Page: A4 ✓ - Cole Information Services 8TH AVE S 2003 36612 DAVID BRIDGES FIEDLER JOHN E ENGINEER 36818 MARY LARSON 36825 ROBERT CARLSON 36905 DONALD ELIAS 36930 HYLAND CABINETWORKS INC TIMOTHY HYLAND 37007 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 37022 GLENNA WINTER 37025 ELAINE HARRINGTON 37029 FRA DEAN 37031 TED BINDER 37128 KEITH CLARNO 37131 CLARENCE LUNDEN 37211 CHRISTOPHER ELTRICH 37227 JOHN LANE 37303 DAVID JUSTICE 37325 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 37515 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 4165293.4 Page: A5 ✓ Cole Information Services S 371 ST ST 2003 2112 ANDREAS RAAS 2115 DOUGLAS OLSON 2116 THOMAS NIPERT 2119 SERGEY FILOVETS 2122 BERNIE SANDERS 2402 JOHN OLEARY 2406 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2407 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2411 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2412 COOL PRODUCTS LLC GLENN ANDERSEN 2417 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2418 LAURI AMOS 2423 PATRICIA JAMES 2424 F VANASSE 2429 AARON ADAMS 2430 LESLIE POPE 2431 JERRY KELLER 2504 RALPH TOLMAN 2505 STEVE WEIDNER 2510 BRENDA SMITH 2511 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2516 HILDA DEGRAAFF 2517 DIANE YEATS 2522 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2523 JON BIRKLID 2528 KELLY ROBINSON 2529 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2534 EDUARDO GONZALEZ 2535 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2705 DONALD HENNING 2706 JIM ANDERSON 2709 HAROLD YOUNGCHILD 2710 HOWARD HORNSBY 2716 MARGUERITE CONDON 2717 CHARLOTTE SAUM 2722 PATRICIA ROBERTS 2728 JAMES WARREN 2734 PETER MORTENSEN 4165293.4 Page: A6 8TH AVE S 1999 Cole Information Services 36612 FIEDLER JOHN E ENGR 36818 ANNA LARSON 36825 ROBERT OLE 36905 DONALD ELIAS 36930 AUDREY KRAL 37003 CHERYL KELLIS 37007 CHERYL KELLIS E MCCOLLEY WENDY JONES 37022 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 37025 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 37029 SKIP DEAN 37031 TED BINDER 37211 C ELTRICH H CARRUTH 37227 JOHN LANE 37325 PATRICE WATKINS 37515 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN SPRING VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL CAMPUS 2 4165293.4 Page: A7 ✓ Cole Information Services S 371 ST ST 1999 2112 ANDREAS RAAS 2116 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2119 DON GODFREY 2122 BERNIE SANDERS 2403 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2407 MABEL ZIMMERMAN 2412 GLENN ANDERSEN 2416 ERIN LARSON 2417 PETER WISE 2418 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2423 E STONE 2429 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2430 DIANNA HENDRIX 2431 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2501 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2505 STEVE WEIDNER 2511 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2513 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2516 PATRICK GODLEY 2517 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2519 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2522 NINA WALKER 2523 CHARI BIRKLID 2525 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2528 C TOOZE 2531 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2534 MARTIN CAMACHO 2543 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN 2706 HOWARD MCCUEN 2709 HAROLD YOUNGCHILD 2710 HOWARD HORNSBY 2716 M CONDON 2717 C SAUM ERNEST LINDOM 2722 DIANE ANDERSON 2734 EDITH MORTENSEN 4165293.4 Page: A8 ✓ - Cole Information Services 8TH AVE S 1995 36612 FIEDLER, JOHN E 36818 LARSON, ANNA M 36825 CARLSON, ROBERT 1 36905 ELIAS, DONALD 36930 HYLAND, B J SOUERS,A 37007 ENSLOWNIXON, CYNTHIA NIXON, RANDY 37022 DONDERO, RICHARD J 37025 HARRINGTON, JAMES D 37029 DEAN, SKIP 37031 WARTER, WENDY K 37211 CARRUTH, H ELTRICH, C 37227 LANE, JOHN 37325 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 37515 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 4165293.4 Page: A9 ✓ Cole Information Services S 371 ST ST 1995 2112 RAAS, ANDREAS 2116 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2119 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2122 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2403 MCCLEARY, BRIAN 2412 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2415 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2418 HYLAND, MARY T 2423 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2424 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2429 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2430 JENNINGS, JOHN A 2431 NASH, C 2501 ROGERS, J S 2504 KILLARNEY WOODS MOBILE HOME PK 2505 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2506 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2510 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2512 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2513 RING, STEPHEN 2516 GODLEY, PATRICK 2517 HOFFMAN, P M 2519 HEMMER, MIKE 2523 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2525 KELLY, LARRY 2528 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2529 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2531 STEWART, JOSEPH D 2534 PARKHILL, KENNETH R 2536 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 2543 LANG, COLLEEN 4165293.4 Page: A10 yr 8TH AVE S , 1992 Cole Information Services 36612 FIEDLER, JOHN E 36818 LARSON, WILLIAM E 36825 CARLSON, ROBERT I 36905 ELIAS, DONALD 36930 HYLAND, B J 37007 ENSLOW, MARK NIXON, RANDY 37029 DEAN, SKIP 37031 LUECKE, WILLIAM 37211 CARRUTH, H ELTRICH, C 37227 LANE, JOHN 37301 VALERIO, VALERIE 37515 CORNETT, TAMARA HAGBOM, J SPRING VALLEY SCHL 4165293.4 Page: A11 S 371 ST ST 1992 Cole Information Services 2403 MCCLEARY, BRIAN 2412 MCDONALD, VERNA 2418 HYLAND, MARY T 2431 NASH, C 2504 KILLARNEY WDS MHP 2506 GROSSMAN, STEVEN 2510 (SINGS, JAMES 2513 RING, STEPHEN 2517 HOFFMAN, P M 2525 KELLY, LARRY 2528 ROBINSON, RUSSELL 2534 YAGER, KENNETH R 2543 HOLLENBECK, KEITH 4165293.4 Page: Al2 Cole Criss -Cross Directory 8TH AVE S 1985 * Westwd bt,vppinq Aq 814 3140 33405 * Isa Communications 838 5689 * Satellite Bus Sytrn 838 6441 * Uni-Pac Corp .. 952 6093 * Untd Pac Pell Ins 952 5 33434 * Manpower Temp Svc 838 1228 * Manpower Heaith . 838 1228 * Manpower Ttvip►ry Sv 838 1228 * Manpower Tmprry Sv 952 - 6933 *Wash Edcati Assn 941 - 6700 36818 William E Larson 838 - 4585 36905 Donald J Eras 82 838 - 8140 37031 David Wh!tney a 838- 7210 37033 N P 3 i 21 t Gil Havrifak 80 838 - 3532 37227 John lane 83 838- 7579 37301 Larry Tasche 82 E38 - 6268 37303 NP 37540 H J Moto mats►u 82 8 38 - 2503 79 BESlIDENCE 25 BUSINESS 4165293.4 Page: A13 Cole Criss -Cross Directory � w • r 32734 31742 31 743 31759 32002 32003 32024 32032 32034 32 120 32128 32225 8TH AVE S 1975 SW `. • • a e L . s i.. V a.... L L t. UNDB Y HERBERT PAUL T LEONARD �w-wa&.-wsv 2 8397210 NP H BUERGER 8390715 SCHROEDER 8391751 ADCOCK 9 8399288 NP NP CL I FFORD H BAR STOMA M 8 DOURHMAN 0 ROBER T J MELNYK 4 S Y DNE Y J ME RR I HE W M B MCCLELL AN I 8391993 8398333 8397485 -8395021 9412050 .,....R R 4...... 98003 3*68 1 8*LARSON 130A T&ENGINE 8380994 *SPORTSMENS SR9 CTRa8380994 37025 P 37033*EDGE WOOD HM FIN Su8389493 *"OME FINDERS INC --8389493 *E L PLOEGER REALTY 8389493 139 RESIDENCE 11 BUSINESS 4165293.4 Page: A14 8TH AVE S 1970 Cole Criss -Cross Directory 31621 31629 31630 �31703 31711 31716 31719 31726 31727 31730 31742 31743 31759 32002 32003 32024 32032 12 DAVID JCSEPH EMMETT CLOYS JAMES DAVID DEAN A ZENGEL A J OHN SON M HOL EN w CARTER L C AUL CE TAUTFEST N A CL E NP DON L HITCHCOCK BENJAMIN E WERTMAN 9 WILLIAM L ROSS HERBERT H BUERGER PAUL T SCHROEDER LEONARD ADCOCK 9 N R SAGEN M 8 DOUPHM AN CLIFFORD H BARSTOW I RESIDENCE 4 13VE96346 OVE92474 VE9 16 78 VE91727 OVE985 1 0 09410223 --VE94169 VE91424 VE96934 --VE95654 VE9C71S V E9 1 75 1 VE99288 OVE93741 MVE98333 VE91993 BUSINESS 4165293.4 Page: A15 APPENDIX F -'h' Environmental Data Resources Radius Map Report with GeoCheck° (on DVD) Larson Property 36818 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 Inquiry Number: 4165293.2s December 19, 2014 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 CEDROEnvironmental Data Resources Inc Toll .edrne.com .0050 www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary -----------------_- - ... - - ----------------------------- ES1 Overview Map------------------- ------------------------------------------ DetailMap --------- --------------------------------------- 3 Map Findings Summary ----------------------- -------------------- 4 Map Findings--------------------- ----------------------.._.. 8 Orphan Summary------------------------------------------------------- 30 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking_ - .. _ _ _ _ _ _ .- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . -. _ . - GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum- -._.._. -- ___________________-____ ..- A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary_______ _______________________________ A-2 Physical Setting SSURGOSoil Map ----------------------------------------------- A-5 Physical Setting Source Map_ . .. .. -. _ _ _ _ _ A-14 Physical Setting Source Map Findings ---------- -._.-______-_.-__________.. A-16 Physical Setting Source Records Searched-.- -- .- -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ . - - - _ -. - _ _ _ PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the tar et and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTIKN WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS'. Any anet yses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2014 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiiates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their res ective owners. , TC4165293.2s Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 36818 8TH AVE S KING County, WA 98003 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 47.2711000 - 47' 16' 15.96" 122.3239000 - 122' 19' 26.04" Zone 10 551141.8 5235294.0 105 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Map: 47122-C3 POVERTY BAY, WA Most Recent Revision: 1994 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT Portions of Photo from: 20110826 Source: USDA TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL------------------------- National Priority List TC4165293 2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proposed NPL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ........ Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL _ ... _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS______________ _ _ _ _ _ _ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System FEDERAL FACILITY--------- Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP--------------- CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS----------------- Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF----------------- RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG-.---------------- RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRA-SQG------------------ RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG--------------- RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS-------- Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL-__-----_ Sites with Institutional Controls LUCIS----------------------- Land Use Control Information System Federal ERNS list ERNS ------------------------ Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL HSL------------------------- Hazardous Sites List State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWFILF------ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Solid Waste Facility Database State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ..... .. Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________ Underground Storage Tank Database TC4165293.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AST-------------------------. Aboveground Storage Tank Locations INDIAN UST----------------- Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEMA UST_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROL............ Institutional Control Site List State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites ICR__________________________ Independent Cleanup Reports INDIAN VCP_________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP_________________________ Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS-------------- Brownfields Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI__________________________ Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9__________ Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations SWTIRE_____________________ Solid Waste Tire Facilities SWRCY---------------------- Recycling Facility List INDIAN ODI------------------ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL---------------------- Clandestine Drug Labs CSCSL NFA_________________ Confirmed & Contaminated Sites- No Further Action .CDL-------------------------- Clandestine Drug Lab Contaminated Site List HIST CDL___________________ List of Sites Contaminated by Clandestine Drug Labs US HIST CDL _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ .... National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2---------------------- CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS----------------------- Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System SPILLS ---------------------- Reported Spills SPILLS 90------------------- SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR-------- RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated DOT OPS____________________ Incident and Accident Data DOD_________________________ Department of Defense Sites FUDS------------------------ Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT___________________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD------------------------- Records Of Decision TC4165293.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY UMTRA______________________ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites US MINES___________________ Mines Master Index File TRIS_________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA________________________ Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS________________________ FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS--------------- ._.. FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS________________________ Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS------------------------ .. Integrated Compliance Information System PADS-----------------....... PCB Activity Database System MLTS------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO____________________ Radiation Information Database FINDS_______________________ Facility Index System/Facility Registry System RAATS______________________ RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RMP------------------------- Risk Management Plans UIC------------------------ . _ Underground Injection Wells Listing MANIFEST-----------------.. Hazardous Waste Manifest Data DRYCLEANERS------------- Drycleaner List NPDES______________________ Water Quality Permit System Data AIRS_________________________ Washington Emissions Data System Inactive Drycleaners_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Inactive Drycleaners SCRD DRYCLEANERS______ State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Financial Assurance__________ Financial Assurance Information Listing COAL ASH___________________ Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing LEAD SMELTERS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS_____________________ Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem COAL ASH EPA______________ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List EPA WATCH LIST ----------- EPA WATCH LIST US FIN ASSUR______________ Financial Assurance Information PCB TRANSFORMER_______. PCB Transformer Registration Database COAL ASH DOE_____________ Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data 2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List PRP_________________________ Potentially Responsible Parties EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP------------------- EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR US Hist Auto Stat______ EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR US Hist Cleaners -------- EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS___________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List RGA LF---------------------- Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST___________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. TC4165293.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS CSCSL: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Ecology's Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites List. A review of the CSCSL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/21/2014 has revealed that there are 3 CSCSL sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SPRING VALLEY SITE 37000 PACIFIC HWY S WSW 114 - 112 (0.359 mi.) A5 18 CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY 215 373RD ST S WSW 114 - 112 (0.485 mi.) 7 22 POWER MASTERS INC 37405 PACIFIC HWY S SW 112 - 1 (0.609 mi.) 8 24 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Ecology's Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Site List. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/18/2014 has revealed that there are 2 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SPRING VALLEY SITE CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 37000 PACIFIC HWY S WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.359 mi.) A5 18 215 373RD ST S WSW 114 - 112 (0.485 mi.) 7 22 US BROWNFIELDS: The EPA's listing of Brownfields properties from the Cleanups in My Community program, which provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. A review of the US BROWNFIELDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/22/2014 has revealed that there TC4165293.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY is 1 US BROWNFIELDS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page SPRING VALLEY UST SITE 37000 PACIFIC HIGHWAYS WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.359 mi.) A4 15 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites ALLSITES: Information on facilities and sites of interest to the Department of Ecology. A review of the ALLSITES list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/06/2014 has revealed that there are 6 ALLSITES sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page MCLANE NORTHWEST SOUTHBOUND 15 MI 141 E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.274 mi.) 3 14 MORNINGSIDE CARE SENIOR LIVING MILTON RD 5TH AVE AT TH SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.408 mi.) 6 21 Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATI ADJACENT TO 530 S 373RD SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.269 mi.) 1 8 WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATI SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.269 mi.) 2 8 SPRING VALLEY SITE 37000 PACIFIC HWY S WSW 1/4 - 112 (0.359 mi.) A5 18 CLARKS PA YLESS OIL COMPANY 215 373RD ST S WSW 114 - 1/2 (0.485. mi.) 7 22 Other Ascertainable Records INDIAN RESERV: This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. A review of the INDIAN RESERV list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2005 has revealed that there is 1 INDIAN RESERV site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page PUYALLUP INDIAN RESERVATION SW 1/2 - 1 (0.662 mi.) 0 8 TC4165293.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There were no unmapped sites in this report. TC4165293.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 OVERVIEW MAP - 4165293.2S 14 N Target Property A Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property ♦ Sites at elevations lower than the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants National Priority List Sites , I Dept. Defense Sites SITE NAME: Larson Property ADDRESS: 36818 8th Ave S Federal Way WA 98003 LAT/LONG: 47.2711 / 122.3239 s 6 t 1� r � s 3 S, St 1% a ,r V�I 161� 5 0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles I- - Indian Reservations BIA /V County Boundary o y Oil & Gas pipelines from USGS ® 100-year flood zone 500-year flood zone ® National Wetland Inventory This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc CONTACT: Sierra Mott INQUIRY #: 4165293.2s DATE: December 19, 2014 1:39 pm DETAIL MAP - 4165293.2S SPRING VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHL SPRING VALLEY MONTESSORI SCH00 0 N Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property A Manufactured Gas Plants i Sensitive Receptors El National Priority List Sites I , j Dept. Defense Sites 2 1A s a 3 �7s o S/ Q y 3 7 2 n d WaY � ¢ S m o Q a �` co h `o 0 1 /16 1 /8 1 /4 Ulles Indian Reservations BIA IV Oil & Gas pipelines from USGS ® 100-year flood zone 500-year flood zone National Wetland Inventory This report includes Interactive Map Layers to display and/or hide map information. The legend includes only those icons for the default map view. SITE NAME: Larson Property CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc ADDRESS: 36818 8th Ave S CONTACT: Sierra Mott Federal Way WA 98003 INQUIRY #: 4165293.2s LAT/LONG: 47.2711 / 122.3239 DATE: December 19, 2014 1:40 pm MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 NPL LIENS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA-CESQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 Federal ERNS list ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL HSL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS CSCSL 1.000 0 0 2 1 NR 3 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST 0.500 0 0 2 NR NR 2 TC4165293.2s Page 4 Database MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROL 0.500 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites ICR 0.500 INDIAN VCP 0.500 VCP 0.500 State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS 0.500 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites ODI 0.500 DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 SWTIRE 0.500 SWRCY 0.500 INDIAN ODI 0.500 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL TP ALLSITES 0.500 CSCSL NFA 0.500 CDL TP HIST CDL TP US HIST CDL TP Local Land Records LIENS 2 TP Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS TP SPILLS TP SPILLS 90 TP Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 6 NR NR 6 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TC4165293.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 DOT OPS TP NR NR NR NR NR DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR HIST FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR ICIS TP NR NR NR NR NR PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR MILTS TP NR NR NR NR NR RADINFO TP NR NR NR NR NR FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR RMP TP NR NR NR NR NR UIC TP NR NR NR NR NR MANIFEST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR NPDES TP NR NR NR NR NR AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR Inactive Drycleaners 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR Financial Assurance TP NR NR NR NR NR COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR LEAD SMELTERS TP NR NR NR NR NR US AIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR EPA WATCH LIST TP NR NR NR NR NR US FIN ASSUR TP NR NR NR NR NR PCB TRANSFORMER TP NR NR NR NR NR COAL ASH DOE TP NR NR NR NR NR 2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR PRP TP NR NR NR NR NR EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS Total Plotted EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC4165293.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Distance Target Total Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Plotted RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC4165293.2s Page 7 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site IND RES PUYALLUP INDIAN RESERVATION Region SW PUYALLUP INDIAN RESERVATI (County), WA 1/2-1 3496 ft. INDIAN RESERV: Feature: Indian Reservation Name: Puyallup Indian Reservation Agency: BIA State: WA 1 WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION CSWGP SSW ADJACENT TO 530 S 373RD ST 1/4-1/2 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98056 0.269 mi. 1419 ft. Relative: ALLSITES: Lower Facility Id: Latitude: Actual: Longitude: 61 ft. Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: 2 SW 114-1/2 0.269 mi. 1420 ft. Relative: Lower Actual: 47 ft. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number INDIAN RESERV CIND100095 N/A ALLSITES S110039136 N/A 20153 47.2675 -122.328 CONSTGP 20153 WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION CSWGP A CONSTGP Construction SW GP WATQUAL PARIS WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION WAR006905 7/24/2006 0:00 Not reported Facility/Site Interaction T: 87444 Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 20153 Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: CONSTGP Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: Construction SW GP Interaction Status: A Federal Program Indentifier: WAR006905 Interaction Start Date: 07/24/2006 Interaction End Date: Not reported prgm_facil: WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION cur_sys_pr: WATQUAL cur_sys_nm: PARIS WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION PROJECT FEDERAL WAY, WA ALLSITES: Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: 9245074 47.2684350 -122.32900 ALLSITES S109554969 N/A TC4165293.2s Page 8 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction 11 Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION PROJECT (Continued) S109664969 Ecology Interest Type Code: 401 PROJ Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: 401PROJ Interaction 2: 401 CZM Project Site Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: AQUATICS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: 200600839 Date Interaction: 6/26/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported TC4165293.2s Page 9 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction E_ Distance Elevation Site WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION PROJECT (Continued) Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Not reported 7/7/2006 0:00 Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S109554969 TC4165293.2s Page 10 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MNDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION PROJECT (Continued) S109554969 Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3 Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3 Not reported Facility Id: 9245074 Latitude: 47.2684350 Longitude: -122.32900 Ecology Interest Type Code: NONENFNL Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: 401 PROJ Interaction 2: 401CZM Project Site Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: AQUATICS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: 200600839 Date Interaction: 6/26/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported TC4165293.2s Page 11 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation �L Site MAP FINDINGS WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION PROJECT (Continued) Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S109554969 TC4165293.2s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation fIMAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION PROJECT (Continued) S109554969 Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 9245074 Facility Company: WA DOT Spring Valley Restoration Project Interaction: A TC4165293.2s Page 13 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number WA DOT SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION PROJECT (Continued) S109554969 Interaction 1: NONENFNL Interaction 2: Non Enforcement Final Ecology Program: SEA Program Data: DMS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 7/7/2006 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported 3 MCLANE NORTHWEST RCRA NonGen / NLR 1000878632 East SOUTHBOUND 15 Mi 141 ALLSITES WA0000105692 1/4-1/2 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 0.274 mi. 1446 ft. Relative: RCRA NonGen / NLR: Higher Date form received by agency:01/01/1995 Facility name: MCLANE NORTHWEST Actual: Facility address: SOUTHBOUND 15 MI 141 195 ft. FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 EPA ID: WA0000105692 Mailing address: PO BOX 98848 TACOMA, WA 98498-0848 Contact: MCLANE NORTHWES MCLANE NORTHWES Contact address: PO BOX 98848 TACOMA, WA 98498-0848 Contact country: US Contact telephone: (000)000-0000 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 10 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: Owner/operator name: Owner/operator address: Owner/operator country: Owner/operator telephone: Legal status: Owner/Operator Type: Owner/Op start date: Owner/Op end date: MARY M PO BOX 98848 TACOMA, WA 98498 US (253)582-7500 Private Operator 11 /21 /1996 Not reported MCLANE NORTHWES M 1-5 MI 141 AUBURN, WA 98002 US (000)000-0000 Private Owner 05/01 /1996 Not reported Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No TC4165293.2s Page 14 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site MCLANE NORTHWEST (Continued) Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On -site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: ALLSITES: Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: No violations found 34841152 47.27032 -122.31767 HWG 34841152 McLane Northwest I HWG Hazardous Waste Generator HAZWASTE TURBOWASTE Not reported WA0000105692 2/1/1994 0:00 12/31/1994 0:00 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000878632 A4 SPRING VALLEY UST SITE US BROWNFIELDS 1014934064 WSW 37000 PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH N/A 1/4-1/2 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 0.359 mi. 1894 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Relative: US BROWNFIELD& Lower Recipient name: King County Solid Waste Division Grant type: Assessment Actual: Property name: SPRING VALLEY UST SITE 68 ft. Property #: 3221049055 Parcel size: 1.64 Property Description: The site is an undeveloped parcel located on the east side of Pacific Highway South within the upper drainage of Hylebos Creek and contains key wetland and stream habitat that the city of Federal Way wishes to protect and restore. Historical tax records on file at the Puget Sound Regional Archives indicate that a small gas station was operating on this property from 1930 until it was torn down in the 1960s. Since that time the property has been vacant and undeveloped. In 2007, the city of Federal Way purchased the site as part of a larger 20 acre acquisition of wetland and stream habitat known as the Spring Valley Ranch and Restoration site. In 2008, highway workers clearing brush along Pacific Highway South uncovered a concrete pad, TC4165293.2s Page 15 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction 4 - Distance Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number SPRING VALLEY UST SITE (Continued) pump island, and fill pipes for two underground storage tanks USTs from the former gas station. Tax records show that the former gas station had two USTs of 550 gallons each. Latitude: 47.26727 Longitude: -122.33477 HCM label: Global Positioning Method -Unspecified Parameters Map scale: Not reported Point of reference: Center of a Facility or Station Datum: North American Datum of 1983 ACRES property ID: 133552 Start date: Not reported Completed date: Not reported Acres cleaned up: Not reported Cleanup funding: Not reported Cleanup funding source: Not reported Assessment funding: 30843 Assessment funding source: US EPA - Brownfields Assessment Cooperative Agreement Redevelopment funding: Not reported Redev. funding source: Not reported Redev. funding entity name: Not reported Redevelopment start date: Not reported Assessment funding entity: EPA Cleanup funding entity: Not reported Grant type: P Accomplishment type: Phase II Environmental Assessment Accomplishment count: 1 Cooperative agreement #: OOJ26801 Ownership entity: Government Current owner: City of Federal Way Did owner change: N Cleanup required: Yes Video available: No Photo available: Yes Institutional controls required: U IC Category proprietary controls: Not reported IC cat. info. devices: Not reported IC cat. gov. controls: Not reported IC cat. enforcement permit tools: Not reported IC in place date: Not reported IC in place: Not reported State/tribal program date: Not reported State/tribal program ID: Not reported State/tribal NFA date: Not reported Air contaminated: Not reported Air cleaned: Not reported Asbestos found: Not reported Asbestos cleaned: Not reported Controled substance found: Not reported Controled substance cleaned: Not reported Drinking water affected: Not reported Drinking water cleaned: Not reported Groundwater affected: Not reported Groundwater cleaned: Not reported Lead contaminant found: Not reported Lead cleaned up: Not reported No media affected: Not reported Unknown media affected: Not reported 1014934064 TC4165293.2s Page 16 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SPRING VALLEY UST SITE (Continued) 1014934064 Other cleaned up: Not reported Other metals found: Not reported Other metals cleaned: Not reported Other contaminants found: Not reported Other contams found description: Not reported PAHs found: Not reported PAHs cleaned up: Not reported PCBs found: Not reported PCBs cleaned up: Not reported Petro products found: Y Petro products cleaned: Not reported Sediments found: Not reported Sediments cleaned: Not reported Soil affected: Y Soil cleaned up: Not reported Surface water cleaned: Not reported VOCs found: Not reported VOCs cleaned: Not reported Cleanup other description: Not reported Num. of cleanup and re-dev. jobs: Not reported Past use greenspace acreage: Not reported Past use residential acreage: Not reported Past use commercial acreage: 1.64 Past use industrial acreage: Not reported Future use greenspace acreage: 1.64 Future use residential acreage: Not reported Future use commercial acreage: Not reported Future use industrial acreage: Not reported Greenspace acreage and type: Not reported Superfund Fed. landowner flag: N Arsenic cleaned up: Not reported Cadmium cleaned up: Not reported Chromium cleaned up: Not reported Copper cleaned up: Not reported Iron cleaned up: Not reported mercury cleaned up: Not reported nickel cleaned up: Not reported No clean up: Not reported Pesticides cleaned up: Not reported Selenium cleaned up: Not reported SVOCs cleaned up: Not reported Unknown clean up: Not reported Arsenic contaminant found: Not reported Cadmium contaminant found: Not reported Chromium contaminant found: Not reported Copper contaminant found: Not reported Iron contaminant found: Not reported Mercury contaminant found: Not reported Nickel contaminant found: Not reported No contaminant found: Not reported Pesticides contaminant found: Not reported Selenium contaminant found: Not reported SVOCs contaminant found: Not reported Unknown contaminant found: Not reported Future Use: Multistory Not reported Media affected Bluiding Material: Not reported Media affected indoor air: Not reported TC4165293.2s Page 17 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number SPRING VALLEY UST SITE (Continued) 1014934064 Building material media cleaned up: Not reported Indoor air media cleaned up: Not reported Unknown media cleaned up: Not reported Past Use: Multistory Not reported A5 SPRING VALLEY SITE CSCSL S111289290 WSW 37000 PACIFIC HWY S ALLSITES N/A 1/4-1/2 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 LUST 0.359 mi. 1894 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Relative: CSCSL: Lower Facility ID: 22776 Region: Northwest Actual: Lat/Long: 47.270101 /-122.33141 68 ft. Brownfield Status: Not reported Rank Status: N Clean Up Siteid: 11982 Site Status: Awaiting Cleanup PSI?: Not reported Contaminant Name: Benzene Ground Water: Below MTCA Cleanup Level After Assessment Surface Water: Not reported Soil: Confirmed Above Cleanup Level Sediment: Not reported Air: Not reported Bedrock: Not reported Responsible Unit: Northwest Facility ID: 22776 Region: Northwest Lat/Long: 47.270101 /-122.33141 Brownfield Status: Not reported Rank Status: N Clean Up Siteid: 11982 Site Status: Awaiting Cleanup PSI?: Not reported Contaminant Name: Petroleum -Gasoline Ground Water: Below MTCA Cleanup Level After Assessment Surface Water: Not reported Soil: Confirmed Above Cleanup Level Sediment: Not reported Air: Not reported Bedrock: Not reported Responsible Unit: Northwest ALLSITES: Facility Id: 22776 Latitude: 47.270101 Longitude: -122.33141 Ecology Interest Type Code: LUST Facility ID: 22776 Facility Company: SPRING VALLEY SITE Interaction: A Interaction 1: LUST Interaction 2: LUST Facility Ecology Program: TOXICS TC4165293.2s Page 18 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SPRING VALLEY SITE (Continued) Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: MAP FINDINGS ISIS SPRING VALLEY SITE 619808 1/12/2012 0:00 Not reported 22776 SPRING VALLEY SITE A SCS State Cleanup Site TOXICS ISIS Spring Valley Restoration Not reported 1/12/2012 0:00 Not reported 22776 SPRING VALLEY SITE UST Underground Storage Tank TOXICS UST SPRING VALLEY SITE Not reported 9/2/2011 0:00 9/2/2011 0:00 22776 47.270101 -122.33141 SCS 22776 SPRING VALLEY SITE A LUST LUST Facility TOXICS ISIS SPRING VALLEY SITE 619808 1/12/2012 0:00 Not reported 22776 SPRING VALLEY SITE A SCS State Cleanup Site TOXICS ISIS Spring Valley Restoration Not reported 1/12/2012 0:00 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S111289290 TC4165293.2s Page 19 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Site SPRING VALLEY SITE (Continued) Date Interaction 3: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: MAP FINDINGS Not reported 22776 SPRING VALLEY SITE UST Underground Storage Tank TOXICS UST SPRING VALLEY SITE Not reported 9/2/2011 0:00 9/2/2011 0:00 22776 47.270101 -122.33141 UST 22776 SPRING VALLEY SITE A LUST LUST Facility TOXICS ISIS SPRING VALLEY SITE 619808 1/12/2012 0:00 Not reported 22776 SPRING VALLEY SITE A SCS State Cleanup Site TOXICS ISIS Spring Valley Restoration Not reported 1/12/2012 0:00 Not reported 22776 SPRING VALLEY SITE I UST Underground Storage Tank TOXICS UST SPRING VALLEY SITE Not reported 9/2/2011 0:00 9/2/2011 0:00 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S111289290 TC4165293.2s Page 20 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site SPRING VALLEY SITE (Continued) LUST: Facility ID: Facility Status: Cleanup Site ID: Cleanup Unit Type: Process Type: Alternate Name: Release Status Date: Site Response Unit Code: Lat/Long: 22776 Awaiting Cleanup 11982 Upland Independent Action SPRING VALLEY RESTORATION 08/09/2011 Northwest 47.270101 /-122.33141 6 MORNINGSIDE CARE SENIOR LIVING FAC SSE MILTON RD 5TH AVE AT THE INTERSECT 114-1/2 MILTON, WA 98354 0.408 mi. 2155 ft. Relative: ALLSITES: Higher Facility Id: Latitude: Actual: Longitude: 192 ft. Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 20180 47.265 -122.321 CONSTGP 20180 MORNINGSIDE CARE SENIOR LIVING FAC I CONSTGP Construction SW GP WATQUAL PARIS MORNINGSIDE CARE SENIOR LIVING FAC WAR006924 8/21 /2006 0:00 12/16/2010 0:00 Facility/Site Interaction T: Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: Interaction Status: Federal Program Indentifier: Interaction Start Date: Interaction End Date: prgm_facil: cur_sys_pr: cur_sys_nm: 84333 20180 CONSTGP Construction SW GP A WAR006924 08/21 /2006 Not reported MORNINGSIDE CARE SENIOR LIVING FAC WATQUAL PARIS S111289290 ALLSITES S110039039 N/A TC4165293.2s Page 21 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site 7 CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY WSW 215 373RD ST S 1/4-1/2 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 0.485 mi. 2559 ft. Relative: CSCSL: Lower Facility ID: Region: Actual: Lat/Long: 68 ft. Brownfield Status: Rank Status: Clean Up Siteid: Site Status: PSI?: Contaminant Name: Ground Water: Surface Water: Soil: Sediment: Air: Bedrock: Responsible Unit: 64236498 Northwest 47.2671228 /-122.3335978 Not reported N 9992 Cleanup Started Not reported Petroleum -Other Not reported Not reported Confirmed Above Cleanup Level Not reported Not reported Not reported Northwest ALLSITES: Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: 64236498 47.2671228 -122.33359 UST 64236498 CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY A LUST LUST Facility TOXICS ISIS Not reported 100510 2/6/1991 0:00 Not reported 64236498 CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY A UST Underground Storage Tank TOXICS UST Not reported 100510 3/25/1991 0:00 Not reported 64236498 47.2671228 -122.33359 LUST 64236498 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number CSCSL 0001127912 ALLSITES N/A LUST UST TC4165293.2s Page 22 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY (Continued) 0001127912 Facility Company: CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY Interaction: A Interaction 1: LUST Interaction 2: LUST Facility Ecology Program: TOXICS Program Data: ISIS Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: 100510 Date Interaction: 2/6/1991 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility ID: 64236498 Facility Company: CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY Interaction: A Interaction 1: UST Interaction 2: Underground Storage Tank Ecology Program: TOXICS Program Data: UST Facility Alt.: Not reported Program ID: 100510 Date Interaction: 3/25/1991 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported LUST: Facility ID: 64236498 Facility Status: Cleanup Started Cleanup Site ID: 9992 Cleanup Unit Type: Upland Process Type: Independent Action Alternate Name: Clarke Property Release Status Date: 06/01/1995 Site Response Unit Code: Northwest Lat/Long: 47.2671228 /-122.33359 UST: Facility ID: 64236498 Site Id: 100510 UBI: Not reported Phone Number: 2069272666 Decimal Latitude: 47.2671228 Decimal Longitude: -122.3335978 Tank Name: 1 Tag Number: Not reported Tank Status: Closure in Process Tank Status Date: 08/06/1996 Tank Install Date: 00/31/1964 Tank Closure Date: Not reported Capacity Range: Not reported Tank Permit Expiration Date: Not reported Tank Upgrade Date: Not reported Tank Spill Prevention: Not reported Tank Overfill Prevention: Not reported Tank Material: Not reported Tank Construction: Not reported TC4165293.2s Page 23 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS l Site CLARKS PAYLESS OIL COMPANY (Continued) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Tank Tightness Test: Not reported Tank Corrosion Protection: Not reported Tank Manifold: Not reported Tank Release Detection: Not reported Tank SFC Type: Not reported Pipe Material: Not reported Pipe Construction: Not reported Pipe Primary Release Detection: Not reported Pipe Second Release Detection: Not reported Pipe Corrosion Protection: Not reported Pipe Pumping System: Not reported Responsible Unit: NORTHWEST Dispencer/Pump SFC Type: Not reported Tank Name: 2 Tag Number: Not reported Tank Status: Closure in Process Tank Status Date: 08/06/1996 Tank Install Date: 00/31/1964 Tank Closure Date: Not reported Capacity Range: Not reported Tank Permit Expiration Date: Not reported Tank Upgrade Date: Not reported Tank Spill Prevention: Not reported Tank Overfill Prevention: Not reported Tank Material: Not reported Tank Construction: Not reported Tank Tightness Test: Not reported Tank Corrosion Protection: Not reported Tank Manifold: Not reported Tank Release Detection: Not reported Tank SFC Type: Not reported Pipe Material: Not reported Pipe Construction: Not reported Pipe Primary Release Detection: Not reported Pipe Second Release Detection: Not reported Pipe Corrosion Protection: Not reported Pipe Pumping System: Not reported Responsible Unit: NORTHWEST Dispencer/Pump SFC Type: Not reported 8 POWER MASTERS INC CERC-NFRAP SW 37405 PACIFIC HWY S RCRA NonGen / NLR 1/2-1 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 CSCSL 0.609 mi. ALLSITES 3218 ft. CSCSL NFA Relative: CERC-NFRAP: Lower Site ID: 1000808 Federal Facility: Not a Federal Facility Actual: NPL Status: Not on the NPL 82 ft. Non NPL Status: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Alias Name(s): Alias Name: D & S PETROLEUM Alias Address: Not reported 0001127912 1000137147 WAD097815617 TC4165293.2s Page 24 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number POWER MASTERS INC (Continued) 1000137147 WA Alias Name: A.J.ZINDA CO Alias Address: Not reported WA Program Priority: Description: TASWER Survey Site CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: Action: DISCOVERY Date Started: Date Completed: 09/01/79 Priority Level: Not reported Action: ARCHIVE SITE Date Started: Date Completed- 05/06/85 Priority Level: Not reported Action: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Date Started: 04/16/85 Date Completed- 05/06/85 Priority Level: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information RCRA NonGen / NLR: Date form received by agency: 01 /06/1992 Facility name: POWER MASTERS INC Facility address: 37405 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 EPA ID: WAD097815617 Mailing address: PO BOX 219125 PORTLAND, OR 97225-9125 Contact: POWER MASTER IN POWER MASTER IN Contact address: PO BOX 219125 PORTLAND, OR 97225-9125 Contact country: us Contact telephone: (000)000-0000 Contact email: Not reported EPA Region: 10 Classification: Non -Generator Description: Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste Owner/Operator Summary: Owner/operator name: POWER MASTER IN P Owner/operator address: 37405 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 Owner/operator country: us Owner/operator telephone: (000)000-0000 Legal status: Private Owner/Operator Type: Owner Owner/Op start date: 05/02/1996 Owner/Op end date: Not reported TC4165293.2s Page 25 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number POWER MASTERS INC (Continued) 1000137147 Handler Activities Summary: U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive): No Recycler of hazardous waste: No Transporter of hazardous waste: No Treater, storer or disposer of HW: No Underground injection activity: No On -site burner exemption: No Furnace exemption: No Used oil fuel burner: No Used oil processor: No User oil refiner: No Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No Used oil Specification marketer: No Used oil transfer facility: No Used oil transporter: No Violation Status: No violations found CSCSL: Facility ID: 2365 Region: Northwest Lat/Long: 47.26633 /-122.33486 Brownfield Status: Not reported Rank Status: N Clean Up Siteid: 1997 Site Status: Awaiting Cleanup PSI?: Not reported Contaminant Name: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic Ground Water: Suspected Surface Water: Suspected Soil: Suspected Sediment: Not reported Air: Not reported Bedrock: Not reported Responsible Unit: Northwest Facility ID: 2365 Region: Northwest Lat/Long: 47.26633 /-122.33486 Brownfield Status: Not reported Rank Status: N Clean Up Siteid: 1997 Site Status: Awaiting Cleanup PSI?: Not reported Contaminant Name: Metals Priority Pollutants Ground Water: Suspected Surface Water: Suspected Soil: Suspected Sediment: Not reported Air: Not reported Bedrock: Not reported Responsible Unit: Northwest Facility ID: 2365 Region: Northwest Lat/Long: 47.26633 /-122.33486 TC4165293.2s Page 26 Map ID MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Elevation Site POWER MASTERS INC (Continued) Brownfield Status: Not reported Rank Status: N Clean Up Siteid: 1997 Site Status: Awaiting Cleanup PSI?: Not reported Contaminant Name: Petroleum Products -Unspecified Ground Water: Suspected Surface Water: Suspected Soil: Suspected Sediment: Not reported Air: Not reported Bedrock: Not reported Responsible Unit: Northwest ALLSITES: Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: 2075 47.2671 -122.33397 SCS 2075 AJ ZINDA Co I SCS State Cleanup Site TOXICS ISIS AJ ZINDA Cc Not reported 3/1/1988 0:00 4/6/1990 0:00 Facility/Site Interaction T: 3425 Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 2075 Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: SCS Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: State Cleanup Site Interaction Status: I Federal Program Indentifier: Not reported Interaction Start Date: 03/01/1988 Interaction End Date: 04/06/1990 prgm_facil: AJ ZINDA Cc cur_sys_pr: TOXICS cur_sys_nm: ISIS Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: 2365 47.26633 -122.33486 HWG 2365 POWER MASTERS INC I HWG Hazardous Waste Generator HAZWASTE TURBOWASTE Not reported WAD097815617 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000137147 TC4165293.2s Page 27 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site POWER MASTERS INC (Continued) Date Interaction: 1/6/1992 0:00 Date Interaction 3: 12/31/1992 0:00 Facility ID: 2365 Facility Company: POWER MASTERS INC Interaction: A Interaction 1: INDPNDNT Interaction 2: Independent Cleanup Ecology Program: TOXICS Program Data: ISIS Facility Alt.: POWER MASTERS INC Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 1/1/1900 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility/Site Interaction T: 4295 Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 2365 Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: HWG Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: Hazardous Waste Generator Interaction Status: Federal Program Indentifier: WAD097815617 Interaction Start Date: 01/06/1992 Interaction End Date: 12/31/1992 prgm facil: Not reported cur_sys_pr: HAZWASTE cur_sys_nm: TURBOWASTE Facility/Site Interaction T: 4296 Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 2365 Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: INDPNDNT Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: Independent Cleanup Interaction Status: A Federal Program Indentifier: Not reported Interaction Start Date: 01/01/1900 Interaction End Date: Not reported prgm_facil: POWER MASTERS INC cur_sys_pr: TOXICS cur_sys_nm: ISIS Facility Id: Latitude: Longitude: Ecology Interest Type Code: Facility ID: Facility Company: Interaction: Interaction 1: Interaction 2: Ecology Program: Program Data: Facility Alt.: Program ID: Date Interaction: Date Interaction 3: Facility ID: 2365 47.26633 -122.33486 INDPNDNT 2365 POWER MASTERS INC I HWG Hazardous Waste Generator HAZWASTE TURBOWASTE Not reported WAD097815617 1/6/1992 0:00 12/31 /1992 0:00 2365 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000137147 TC4165293.2s Page 28 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation MAP FINDINGS Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number POWER MASTERS INC (Continued) 1000137147 Facility Company: POWER MASTERS INC Interaction: A Interaction 1: INDPNDNT Interaction 2: Independent Cleanup Ecology Program: TOXICS Program Data: ISIS Facility Alt.: POWER MASTERS INC Program ID: Not reported Date Interaction: 1/1/1900 0:00 Date Interaction 3: Not reported Facility/Site Interaction T: 4295 Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 2365 Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: HWG Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: Hazardous Waste Generator Interaction Status: I Federal Program Indentifier: WAD097815617 Interaction Start Date: 01/06/1992 Interaction End Date: 12/31/1992 prgm facil: Not reported cur_sys_pr: HAZWASTE cur_sys_nm: TURBOWASTE Facility/Site Interaction T: 4296 Geographic Location Identifier (Alias Facid): 2365 Interaction (Aka Env Int) Type Code: INDPNDNT Interaction (Aka Env Int) Description: Independent Cleanup Interaction Status: A Federal Program Indentifier: Not reported Interaction Start Date: 01/01/1900 Interaction End Date: Not reported prgm_facil: POWER MASTERS INC cur_sys_pr: TOXICS cur_sys_nm: ISIS CSCSL NFA: Facility/Site Id: 2075 CS Id: 1303 NFA Date: 04/06/1990 Rank: Not reported VCP: No Latitude: 47.2671 Longitude: -122.33397 TC4165293.2s Page 29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 NPL Site Boundaries Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 EPA Region 5 Telephone 312-886-6686 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 7 Telephone:913-551-7247 EPA Region 8 Telephone:303-312-6774 EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4246 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4165293.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Federal CERCLIS list Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation. and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 11/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 07/21 /2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 11/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC4165293.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 06/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Federal RCRA generators list Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 06/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 06/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 06/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4165293.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 09/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 08/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 11 Federal ERNS list Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2014 Telephone: 202-267-2180 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL HSL: Hazardous Sites List The Hazardous Sites List is a subset of the CSCSL Report. It includes sites which have been assessed and ranked using the Washington Ranking Method (WARM). Date of Government Version: 08/27/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 27 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7200 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC4165293.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CSCSL: Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites List State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: 10/21/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7200 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually State and tribal landrill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Solid Waste Facility Database Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 32 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6132 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Site List Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 08/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7183 Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 03/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2013 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 05/22/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. TC4165293.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/20/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2014 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 11/04/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 11/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 184 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 10/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 19 State and tribal registered storage tank lists Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/30/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7183 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4165293.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Locations A listing of aboveground storage tank locations regulated by the Department of Ecology's Spill Prevention, Preparedness and Response Program. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7562 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/01/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 271 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 07/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 10/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 08/20/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4165293.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 08/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2014 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/20/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries INST CONTROL: Institutional Control Site List Sites that have institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 10/21 /2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 4 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7170 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ICR: Independent Cleanup Reports These are remedial action reports Ecology has received from either the owner or operator of the sites. These actions have been conducted without department oversight or approval and are not under an order or decree. This database is no longer updated by the Department of Ecology. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2002 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/22/2003 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7200 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4165293.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Sites Sites that have entered either the Voluntary Cleanup Program or its predecessor Independent Remedial Action Program. Date of Government Version: 10/21/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 4 State and tribal Brownfields sites Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7200 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Sites Listing A listing of brownfields sites included in the Confirmed & Suspected Sites Listing. Brownfields are abandoned, idle or underused commercial or industrial properties, where the expansion or redevelopment is hindered by real or perceived contamination. Brownfields vary in size, location, age, and past use -- they can be anything from a five -hundred acre automobile assembly plant to a small, abandoned corner gas station. Date of Government Version: 10/21/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 4 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-725-4030 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 09/22/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites TC4165293.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 10/24/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWTIRE: Solid Waste Tire Facilities This study identified sites statewide with unauthorized accumulations of scrap tires. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 SWRCY: Recycling Facility List A Ilisting of recycling center locations. Date of Government Version: 07/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6105 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 10/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ('the Department') provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 07/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4165293.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ALLSITES: Facility/Site Identification System Listing Information on facilities and sites of interest to the Department of Ecology. Date of Government Version: 08/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6423 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CSCSL NFA: Confirmed and Contaminated Sites - No Further Action This report contains information about sites that are undergoing cleanup and sites that are awaiting further investigation and/or cleanup. Sites on the Hazardous Sites List (see above) are included in this data set. Date of Government Version: 10/21/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-7170 Last EDR Contact: 10/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually CDL: Clandestine Drug Lab Contaminated Site List Illegal methamphetamine labs use hazardous chemicals that create public health hazards. Chemicals and residues can cause burns, respiratory and neurological damage, and death. Biological hazards associated with intravenous needles, feces, and blood also pose health risks. Date of Government Version: 08/11/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/27/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 360-236-3380 Last EDR Contact: 11/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST CDL: List of Sites Contaminated by Clandestine Drug Labs This listing of contaminated sites by Clandestine Drug Labs includes non-remediated properties. The current CDL listing does not. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2007 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 360-236-3381 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 07/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 41 Local Land Records Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. TC4165293.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Records of Emergency Release Reports Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually SPILLS: Reported Spills Spills reported to the Spill Prevention, Preparedness and Response Division. Date of Government Version: 09/15/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6950 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013 Number of Days to Update: 62 Other Ascertainable Records Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 06/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4165293.2s Page GR-12 � GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2014 Telephone: Varies Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2014 Number of Days to Update: 31 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 08/05/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 3 03-231-59 59 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually TC4165293.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2013 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: 202-566-1667 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2014 Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC4165293.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 1 Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually [CIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 10/10/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 07/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/02/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/01/2013 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 12/04/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 10/07/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 10/08/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4165293.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 08/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: EPA Telephone: (206) 553-1200 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing A listing of underground injection wells. Date of Government Version: 08/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/20/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Biennially Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6143 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4165293.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WA MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner List A listing of registered drycleaners who registered with the Department of Ecology (using the SIC code of 7215 and 7216) as hazardous waste generators. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 NPDES: Water Quality Permit System Data A listing of permitted wastewater facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/21/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 5 AIRS (EMI): Washington Emissions Data System Emissions inventory data. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/22/2014 Number of Days to Update: 25 INACTIVE DRYCLEANERS: Inactive Drycleaners A listing of inactive drycleaner facility locations. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/04/2014 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6732 Last EDR Contact: 10/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6073 Last EDR Contact: 10/23/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6040 Last EDR Contact: 09/22/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6732 Last EDR Contact: 10/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC4165293.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 11/07/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Data Release Frequency: N/A PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 09/30/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931 and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 10/06/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/19/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for hazardous waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2011 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6754 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. TC4165293.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/24/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/27/2012 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-586-1060 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 11/11/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2012 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 11/14/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 10/31/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/09/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/06/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2007 Number of Days to Update: 44 US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6136 Last EDR Contact: 11/18/2014 Next Scheduled EDP. Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4165293.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/29/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 09/04/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Site Listing A listing of coal ash disposal site locations. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360-407-6933 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/23/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH DOE: Sleam-Electric Plan Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 10/17/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. TC4165293.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Ecology in Washington. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2014 Number of Days to Update: 193 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Ecology in Washington. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4165293.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Ecology in Washington. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Number of Days to Update: 176 COUNTY RECORDS KING COUNTY: Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies Abandoned Landfill Study in King County The King County Abandoned Landfill Survey was conducted from October through December 1984 by the Health Department's Environmental Health Division at the request of the King County Council. The primary objective of the survey was to determine if any public health problems existed at the predetermined 24 sites. Date of Government Version: 04/30/1985 Source: Seattle -King County Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/1994 Telephone: 206-296-4785 Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/21/1994 Number of Days to Update: 0 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SEATTLE COUNTY: Abandoned Landfill Study in the City of Seattle The Seattle Abandoned Landfill Survey was conducted in June and July of 1984 by the Health Department's Environmental Health Division at the request of the Mayor's Office. The primary objective of the survey was to determine if any public health problems existed at the predetermined 12 sites. Date of Government Version: 07/30/1984 Source: Seattle - King County Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/1994 Telephone: 206-296-4785 Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: 10/21/1994 Number of Days to Update: 0 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SEATTLE/KING COUNTY: Seattle - King County Abandoned Landfill Toxicity / Hazard Assessment Project This report presents the Seattle -King County Health Department's follow-up investigation of two city owned and four county owned abandoned landfills which was conducted from February to December 1986. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1986 Source: Department of Public Health Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/18/1995 Telephone: 206-296-4785 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/20/1995 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/1995 Number of Days to Update: 33 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SNOHOMISH COUNTY: Solid Waste Sites of Record at Snohomish Health District Solid waste disposal and/or utilization sites in Snohomish County. TC4165293.2s Page GR722 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/16/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2012 Number of Days to Update: 35 TACOMA/PIERCE COUNTY: Source: Snohomish Health District Telephone: 206-339-5250 Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Closed Landfill Survey Following numerous requests for information about closed dumpsites and landfills in Pierce County, the Tacoma -Pierce County Health Department decided to conduct a study on the matter. The aim of the study was to evaluate public health risks associated with the closed dumpsites and landfills, and to determine the need, if any, for further investigations of a more detailed nature. The sites represent all of the known dumpsites and landfills closed after 1950. Date of Government Version: 09/01/2002 Source: Tacoma -Pierce County Health Department Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2003 Telephone: 206-591-6500 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2003 Last EDR Contact: 03/19/2003 Number of Days to Update: 51 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned OTHER DATABASES) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Telephone: 860-424-3375 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 11/01/2014 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2014 Telephone: 518-402-8651 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/24/2014 Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2014 Number of Days to Update: 19 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/16/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2014 Telephone: 717-783-8990 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2014 Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/02/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4165293.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2014 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/30/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Daycare Center Listing Source: Department of Social & Health Services Telephone: 253-383-1735 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high -resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. TC4165293.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4165293.2s Page GR-25 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS LARSON PROPERTY 36818 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Target Property Map: Most Recent Revision: 47.2711 - 47' 16' 15.96" 122.3239 - 122° 19' 26.04" Zone 10 551141.8 5235294.0 105 ft. above sea level 47122-C3 POVERTY BAY, WA 1994 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. TC4165293.2s Page A-1 GEOCHECKO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY General Topographic Gradient: General WNW SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES c 0 N W N Y' 01 J Oai A OJi W A A N w 0 w w J $ N Oa N ow C N N V mJ 0 N N it N N m West I East TP 0 1/2 1 Miles Target Property Elevation: 105 ft. Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. TC4165293.2s Page A-2 GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Target Property Counter Electronic Data KING, WA YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: 53033C1250F - FEMA Q3 Flood data Additional Panels in search area: 530294125OF - FEMA Q3 Flood data 5301380189C - FEMA Q3 Flood data 5302940001A - FEMA Q3 Flood data NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage POVERTY BAY YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be'an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Site -Specific Hydrogeological Data*. Search Radius: 1.25 miles Status: Not found AQUIFLOW© Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION MAP ID FROM TP Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW 01996 Site —specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerls, Inc , Bainbridge Island, WA All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmenlal Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. TC4165293.2s Page A-3 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratifed Sequence System: Quaternary Series: Quaternary Code: Q (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). TC4165293.2s Page A-4 SSURGO SOIL MAP - 4165293.2s Target Property SSURGO Soil Water SITE NAME: Larson Property CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc ADDRESS: 36818 8th Ave S CONTACT: Sierra Mott Federal Way WA 98003 INQUIRY #: 4165293.2s LAT/LONG: 47.2711 / 122.3239 DATE: December 19, 2014 1:40 pm GEOCHECKO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. Soil Map ID: 1 Soil Component Name: Alderwood Soil Surface Texture: gravelly sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 84 inches Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification hydraulic _ Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group _„ Unified Soil conductiv micro m/s 1 0 inches 11 inches gravelly sandy Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max: 42 loam materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 14 pct. or less Gravels with passing No. fines, Silty 200), Stone Gravel Fragments, Gravel and Sand. 2 11 inches 26 inches very gravelly Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max: 42 sandy loam materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 14 pct. or less Gravels with passing No. fines, Silty - 200), Stone Gravel Fragments, Gravel and Sand. 3 26 inches 59 inches very gravelly Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max: 0.42 sandy loam materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 0.01 pct. or less Gravels with passing No. fines, Silty 200), Stone Gravel Fragments, Gravel and Sand. Soil Reaction (pH) Max: 6 Min. 5.1 Max: 6 Min: 5.1 Max: 6 Min: 5.1 TC4165293.2s Page A-6 GEOCHECW - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Component Name. Tukwila Soil Surface Texture: muck Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Very poorly drained Hydric Status: All hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec Max: 14 (pH) Max: Min: 1 0 inches 18 inches muck A-8 Highly organic soils, Peat. Min: 4 2 18 inches 59 inches stratified A-8 Highly organic Max: 14 Max: Min: diatomaceous soils, Peat. Min: 4 earth to muck Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Component Name: Norma Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained Hydric Status: All hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4165293.2s Page A-7 GEOCHECKO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 9 inches sandy loam Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6.5 materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 5.6 pct. or less Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200), Silty, or Clayey Gravel and Sand. 2 9 inches 29 inches sandy loam Silt -Clay COARSE -GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200), Silty Soils. 3 29 inches 59 inches sandy loam Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max: 42 Max: 6.5 materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 5.6 pct. or less Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200), Silty, or Clayey Gravel and Sand. Soil Map ID: 4 Soil Component Name: Water Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel. Not Reported Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches No Layer Information available. TC4165293.2s Page A-8 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Map ID: 5 Soil Component Name: Bellingham Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained Hydric Status: All hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity Soil Reaction Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 11 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6 Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), silt. Soils. 2 11 inches 59 inches silty clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max: 7.3 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.42 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit 50% or 200), Clayey more), Fat Clay. + Soils. Soil Map ID: 6 Soil Component Name: Soil Surface Texture: Hydrologic Group: Soil Drainage Class: Snohomish silt loam Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Poorly drained TC4165293.2s Page A-9 GEOCHECKO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Hydric Status: All hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic ._ Layer Upper Lower 'Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil lconductiv micro m/s 1 0 inches 11 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 4 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 1.4 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), silt. Soils. _ 2 11 inches 16 inches clay loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 4 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 1.4 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), silt. Soils. 3 16 inches 26 inches mucky peat A-6 Highly organic Max: 14 soils. Peat. Min: 4 4 26 inches 59 inches loamy fine sand Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max: 141 materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 42 pct. or less Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200), Silty, or Clayey Gravel and Sand. Soil Map ID: 7 Soil Component Name: Everett Soil Surface Texture: gravelly sandy loam Hydrologic Group: Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained to excessively drained sands and gravels. Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat excessively drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches Soil Reaction (pH) Max: 6 Min: 5.6 Max: 6 Min: 5.6 Max: 6 Min: 5.6 Max: 6 Min: 5.6 TC4165293.2s Page A-10 GEOCHECKO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layi Boundary Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Clas: 1 0 inches 16 inches gravelly sandy loam 2 116 inches 31 inches very gravelly sandy loam 3 131 inches 159 inches very gravelly coarse sand Soil Map ID: 8 ,r Information Classification Saturated hydraulic -conductivity Soil Reaction AASHTO Group _ Unified Soil micro m/sec (pH) Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max:42 Max:6.5 materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 14 Min: 5.1 pct. or less Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200), Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand. Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max:141 Max:6.5 materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 42 Min: 5.1 pct. or less Gravels with passing No. fines, Silty 200), Stone Gravel Fragments, Gravel and Sand. Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max:705 Max:6.5 materials (35 SOILS, Gravels, Min: 141 Min: 5.6 pct. or less Clean gravels, passing No. Poorly Graded 200), Stone Gravel. Fragments, COARSE -GRAINED Gravel and SOILS, Gravels, Sand. Gravels with fines, Silty Gravel. Soil Component Name: Kitsap Soil Surface Texture: silt loam Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained Hydric Status: Not hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 69 inches TC4165293.2s Page A-11 GEOCHECKO - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Saturated Boundary Classification _ hydraulic Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil (conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 5 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200). Silty 50%), silt. Soils. 2 5 inches 24 inches silt loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: 6.5 Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 Min: 5.6 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), silt. Soils. 3 24 inches 59 inches stratified silt Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 1.4 Max: 6.5 to silty clay Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 0.42 Min: 5.1 loam than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Clayey 50%), silt. Soils. Soil Map ID: 9 Soil Component Name: Shalcar Soil Surface Texture: muck Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Soil Drainage Class: Very poorly drained Hydric Status: All hydric Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches TC4165293.2s Page A-12 GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil conductivity Soil Reaction micro m/sec (pH) 1 0 inches 14 inches muck A-8 Highly organic Max: 14 Max: Min: soils. Peat. Min: 4 2 14 inches 27 inches fine sandy loam Silt -Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 14 Max: Min: Materials (more SOILS, Silts and Min: 4 than 35 pct. Clays (liquid passing No. limit less than 200), Silty 50%), silt. Soils. 3 27 inches 59 inches loamy sand Granular COARSE -GRAINED Max: 705 Max: Min: materials (35 SOILS, Sands, Min: 141 pct. or less Sands with fines, passing No. Silty Sand. 200), Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand. LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile State Database 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION MAP ID 1 A2 A3 4 A5 B8 9 WELL ID USGS40001253159 USGS40001253158 USGS40001253143 USGS40001253133 USGS40001253132 USGS40001253079 USGS40001253096 LOCATION FROM TP 1/8 - 1/4 Mile South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE TC4165293.2s Page A-13 i GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP 10 USGS40001253080 1/2-1 Mile SW 11 USGS40001253343 1/2-1 Mile ENE 12 USGS40001253061 1/2 - 1 Mile SW 13 USGS40001253491 1/2-1 Mile NE 14 USGS40001252968 1/2-1 Mile South 15 USGS40001253492 1/2-1 Mile NW 16 USGS40001252949 1/2 - 1 Mile SW 17 USGS40001253564 1/2-1 Mile NE 18 USGS40001253573 1/2-1 Mile NNE C19 USGS40001253660 1/2-1 Mile North C20 USGS40001253661 1/2-1 Mile North C23 USGS40001253667 1/2-1 Mile North C24 USGS40001253652 1/2-1 Mile North 25 USGS40001253015 1/2-1 Mile SW 26 USGS40001253592 1/2-1 Mile NW 27 USGS40001253666 1/2-1 Mile North 28 USGS40001252828 1/2-1 Mile South 29 USGS40001253088 1/2-1 Mile NW FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID 6 WA7000000009523 137 WA7000000009378 D21 WA7000000009305 D22 WA7000000009306 LOCATION FROM TP LOCATION FROM TP 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SE 1/2 - 1 Mile South 1/2 - 1 Mile South TC4165293.2s Page A-14 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 4165293.2s N N N i County Boundary Major Roads Contour Lines Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater Water Wells Public Water Supply Wells Cluster of Multiple Icons 0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles Groundwater Flow Direction c I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location H D Closest Hydrogeological Data SITE NAME: Larson Property CLIENT: Landau Associates Inc ADDRESS: 36818 8th Ave S CONTACT: Sierra Mott Federal Way WA 98003 INQUIRY#: 4165293.2s LAT/LONG: 47.2711 / 122.3239 DATE: December 19, 2014 1:40 pm L_-GEOCHECK0- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number 1 South FED USGS USGS40001253159 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471604122191602 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32G04 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.268989 Longitude: -122.3242884 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 150 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19421001 Welldepth: 744 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 744 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 SSE SS FED USGS USGS40001253158 1/4 -1/2 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471604122191601 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32G03 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2676001 Longitude: -122.3223439 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 135 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported TC4165293.2s Page A-16 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19420101 Welldepth: 120 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 A3 SSE FED USGS 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471602122191501 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32G01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2670446 Longitude: -122.322066 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 160 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19010101 Welldepth: 400 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 4 SSW FED USGS 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471601122192701 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32F01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2667668 Longitude: -122.3253995 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 125 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported USGS40001253143 USGS40001253133 TC4165293.2s Page A-17 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19530401 Welldepth: 720 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units. Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 A5 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471601122191401 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32G02 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -122.3217883 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19010101 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 6 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Objectid: 9286 Pwsid: Srcnum: 01 Pwssrcid: Systemname: JUSTUS SPRING VALLEY SUPPLY Systemgrou: A Systemtype: NTNC Region: County: KING Smaid: Ftrespopul: 1 Resconnect: Totalconne: 3 Srcname: Srctype: SP Srcusecode: Srcwelldep: 0 Township: Range: 04E Section: Qtrqtrsect: SWSW Longitude: -122.329032 Latitude: 47.274543 Latlongmet: GPS Sresuscept: Srcvulnioc: H Srcvulnvoc: Srcvulnsoc: M Doewelltag: Srctot6mo: 220 Srctot1 yr: FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 47.2667668 24000 seconds 155 1 US 85 Not Reported USGS40001253132 WA WELLS WA7000000009523 37300 3730001 NW Not Reported 1 WELL #1 P 21 29 H M Not Reported 310 TC4165293.2s Page A-18 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Srctot5yr: 700 Srctot10yr: 980 Protection: CFR Pricontact: 2063962246 Priconta 1: Not Reported Priconta 2: 29773 53RD AVE S Priconta 3: AUBURN Priconta 4: WA Priconta 5: 98001 Priconta 6: clareri@msn.com Pwseffecti: 01-JAN-70 Srceffecti: 01-JAN-70 Internalon: N Site id: WA7000000009523 B7 SE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Objectid: 13019 Pwsid: Srcnum: 01 Pwssrcid: Systemname: SCHLIEMANN/ELLINGSON WATER SYSTEM Systemgrou: B Systemtype: GRPB Region: County: KING Smaid: Ftrespopul: 5 Resconnect: Totalconne: 3 Srcname: Srctype: W Srcusecode: Srcwelldep: 142 Township: Range: 04E Section: Qtrqtrsect: SWSE Longitude: -122.3181 Latitude: 47.26524 Latlongmet: GPS Sresuscept: Srcvulnioc: Not Reported Srcvulnvoc: Srcvulnsoc: Not Reported Doewelltag: Srctot6mo: 0 Srctot1 yr: Srctot5yr: 0 Srctot10yr: Protection: Assigned Pricontact: Priconta 1: Not Reported Priconta 2: Priconta 3: KENT Priconta 4: Priconta 5: 98042 Priconta 6: Not Reported Pwseffecti: 01-JUL-78 Srceffecti: Internalon: N Site id: B8 SSE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471555122190101 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-321-101 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -122.318177 Sourcemap scale: WA WELLS WA7000000009378 77375 7737501 NW Not Reported 3 WELL 01 P 21 32 U Not Reported Not Reported 0 0 2536317171 15515 SE 304TH PL WA 01-JAN-70 WA7000000009378 FED USGS Not Reported Not Reported 47.2651002 24000 USGS40001253079 TC4165293.2s Page A-19 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 200 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19760902 Welldepth: 139 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 142 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 24 Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel 1990-11-29 105.10 1990-10-25 105.14 1990-09-19 105.03 1990-08-01 104.83 1990-07-05 104.69 1990-06-07 104.59 1990-05-10 104.51 1990-04-19 104.53 1990-03-22 104.65 1990-02-01 105.16 1990-01-04 105.56 1989-12-01 105.45 1989-10-24 105.26 1989-09-26 105.06 1988-09-29 105.62 1988-07-25 105.41 1988-05-26 105.39 1988-03-23 105.58 1988-01-25 105.39 1987-11-23 105.06 1987-10-08 104.85 1987-04-10 104.23 1986-05-22 104.51 1976-09-02 104 9 SSE FED USGS 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471557122191101 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32K02 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units Not Reported Latitude: 47.2634335 Longitude: -122.3209549 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 220 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported USGS40001253096 TC4165293.2s Page A-20 - - r GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19770125 Welldepth: 360 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 360 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 10 SW FED USGS USGS40001253080 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471555122195101 Monloc name: 21N/04E-32EO1 GETHSMANE-2 Monloc type: Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2651 Longitude: -122.3320663 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 60 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19821201 Welldepth: 10.5 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 10.5 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 11 ENE FED USGS USGS40001253343 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471625122184001 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-28N01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2734335 Longitude: -122.3123437 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 220 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported TC4165293.2s Page A-21 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19671009 Welldepth: Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1967-10-09 92 12 SW 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471552122194701 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32M02 GETHSMANE-1 Monloc type: Well: Test hole not completed as a well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -122.3309551 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19821201 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 13 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471640122184701 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29J01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -122.3142883 Sourcemap scale: Not Reported Not Reported FED USGS USGS40001253061 Not Reported Not Reported 47.2642667 24000 seconds 80 10 US 28 30 FED USGS USGS40001253491 Not Reported Not Reported 47.2770446 24000 TC4165293.2s Page A-22 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method- Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 225 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19530421 Welldepth: 151 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 151 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 3 Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel 1967-10-23 21.24 ------------- Note: The site was being pumped. 1967-08-30 20.95 1961-01-26 16.53 Note: The site had been pumped recently. 14 South FED USGS USGS40001252968 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471544122191701 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32K01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2620446 Longitude: -122.3226216 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 200 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19530201 Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel ------------------ 1953-02-01 60 Note: Other conditions existed that would affect the measured water level. TC4165293.2s Page A-23 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Database EDR ID Number 15 NW FED USGS 112 -1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471640122200301 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-30J01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2776 Longitude: -122.3353998 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 228 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19410101 Welldepth: 82 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 16 SW FED USGS 1/2 -1 Mile Lower Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471541122200001 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-32M01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2634334 Longitude: -122.3340107 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 90 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Vashon Drift of Fraser Glaciation USGS40001253492 USGS40001252949 TC4165293.2s Page A-24 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19720101 Welldepth: 1060 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 1124 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1973-08-28 35 17 NE FED USGS 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471649122185301 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29H02 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2792668 Longitude: -122.314566 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 240 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19620501 Welldepth: 272 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 272 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 18 NNE FED USGS 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471650122185401 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29H01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2803779 Longitude: -122.3162328 Sourcemap scale: 24000 USGS40001253564 USGS40001253573 TC4165293.2s Page A-25 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection rnethod. Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 230 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19420101 Welldepth: 65 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1967-10-23 54 C19 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifiier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471701122192601 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29CO2 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: W/L MEASD BY KCWD 124 Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -122.3248441 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19010101 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 4 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1986-06-03 21.3 1967-08-24 18 FED USGS USGS40001253660 Not Reported Not Reported 47.2826 24000 seconds 210 10 US 130 130 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1967-10-26 17.8 1960-10-04 18.33 TC4165293.2s Page A-26 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation C20 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471701122192701 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29CO3 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: W/L MEASD BY KCWD 124 Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: Longitude: -122.3251219 Sourcemap scale: Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units: Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19480101 Welldepth: Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Wellholedepth units: ft Database EDR ID Number FED USGS USGS40001253661 Not Reported Not Reported 47.2826 24000 seconds 210 10 US 125 125 Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 4 Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel 1986-06-03 21.3 1962-11-02 22.10 1960-10-04 18.20 1948-01-01 17 South WA WELLS WA7000000009305 So 1/2-1 Mile Lower Objectid: 11087 Pwsid: 54950 Srcnum: 07 Pwssrcid: 5495007 Systemname: MILTON, CITY OF Systemgrou: A Systemtype: Comm Region: NW County: PIERCE Smaid: Not Reported Ftrespopul: 8865 Resconnect: 3482 Totalconne: 3546 Srcname: CORRIDOR WELL NO 1 ALP858 Srctype: W Srcusecode: P Srcwelldep: 108 Township: 21 Range: 04E Section: 32 Qtrqtrsect: SESW Longitude: -122.326 Latitude: 47.25946 Latlongmet: QtrQtrSe Sresuscept: M Srcvulnioc: M Srcvulnvoc: M Srcvulnsoc: M Doewel Itag: ALP858 Srctot6mo: 0 Srctot1 yr: 0 TC4165293.2s Page A-27 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Srctot5yr: 0 Srctotl Oyr: 0 Protection: Assigned Pricontact: 2b39228738 Priconta 1: Not Reported Priconta 2: 1000 LAUREL ST Priconta 3: MILTON Priconta 4: WA Priconta 5: 98354 Priconta 6: gbaker@cityofmilton.net Pwseffecti: 01-JAN-70 Srceffecti: 01-NOV-06 Internalon: N Site id: WA7000000009305 D22 South WA WELLS WA7000000009306 1/2-1 Mile Lower Objectid: 11088 Pwsid: 54950 Srcnum: 08 Pwssrcid: 5495008 Systemname: MILTON, CITY OF Systemgrou: A Systemtype: Comm Region: NW County: PIERCE Smaid: Not Reported Ftrespopul: 8865 Resconnect: 3482 Totalconne: 3546 Srcname: CORRIDOR WELL NO 2 AKG806 Srctype: W Srcusecode: P Srcwelldep: 95 Township: 21 Range: 04E Section: 32 Qtrqtrsect: SESW Longitude: -122.326 Latitude: 47.25946 Latlongmet: QtrQtrSe Sresuscept: U Srcvulnioc: L Srcvulnvoc: M Srcvulnsoc: U Doewelltag: AKG806 Srctot6mo: 0 Srctotl yr: 0 Srctot5yr: 0 Srctot10yr: 0 Protection: Assigned Pricontact: 2539228738 Priconta 1: Not Reported Priconta 2: 1000 LAUREL ST Priconta 3: MILTON Priconta 4: WA Priconta 5: 98354 Priconta 6: gbaker@cityofmilton.net Pwseffecti: 01-JAN-70 Srceffecti: 01-NOV-06 Internalon: N Site id: WA7000000009306 C23 North FED USGS USGS40001253667 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471702122192901 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29C04 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: W/L MEASD BY KCWD 124 Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2828778 Longitude: -122.3251219 Sourcemap scale: 24000 TC4165293.2s Page A-28 GEOCHECK@ -PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units. seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 210 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19630101 Welldepth: 97 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 135 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 5 Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel 1986-06-03 21.9 1967-09-19 18.2 1967-09-12 18.2 1967-08-24 18.2 1963-01-01 23 C24 North FED USGS USGS40001253652 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471700122192601 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29C01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2831556 Longitude: -122.3251219 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 180 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19010101 Welldepth: 5.3 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1960-09-27 2 TC4165293.2s Page A-29 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Database 25 SW FED USGS 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471547122201001 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-31J01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2628778 Longitude: -122.3373441 Sourcemap scale: Not Reported Horiz Acc measure: 10 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 9999.99 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 999 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Unknown Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19920225 Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: 2 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 26 NW FED USGS 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471653122200001 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29E01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2812111 Longitude: -122.3345665 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 230 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 1 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported EDR ID Number USGS40001253015 USGS40001253592 TC4165293.2s Page A-30 GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19671009 Welldepth: Not Reported Welldepth units: Not Reported Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1967-10-09 41 27 North FED USGS 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471702122192601 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-29C05 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2837111 Longitude: -122.3251219 Sourcemap scale: Not Reported Horiz Acc measure: 5 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 9999.99 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 999 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Unknown Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: Not Reported Welldepth: 500 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: Not Reported Wellholedepth units: Not Reported Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 28 South FED USGS 1/2-1 Mile Lower Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471528122192901 Monloc name: 21N/04E-32P01 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2576001 Longitude: -122.3259549 Sourcemap scale: 24000 USGS40001253666 USGS40001252828 TC4165293.2s Page A-31 L_ GEOCHECK@- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Horiz Acc measure: 1 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method. Interpolated from map Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 35 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 10 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Interpolated from topographic map Vert coord refsys: NGVD29 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19840813 Welldepth: 108 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 110 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel 1986-05-08 -4.7 29 NW FED USGS 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Org.Identifier: USGS-WA Formal name: USGS Washington Water Science Center Monloc Identifier: USGS-471556122200401 Monloc name: 21 N/04E-30H02 Monloc type: Well Monloc desc: Not Reported Huc code: 17110019 Drainagearea value: Not Reported Drainagearea Units: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea: Not Reported Contrib drainagearea units: Not Reported Latitude: 47.2824167 Longitude: -122.3356389 Sourcemap scale: 24000 Horiz Acc measure: .5 Horiz Acc measure units: seconds Horiz Collection method: Global positioning system (GPS), uncorrected Horiz coord refsys: NAD83 Vert measure val: 267 Vert measure units: feet Vertacc measure val: 5 Vert accmeasure units: feet Vertcollection method: Global Positioning System Vert coord refsys: NAVD88 Countrycode: US Aquifername: Not Reported Formation type: Not Reported Aquifer type: Not Reported Construction date: 19770408 Welldepth: 102 Welldepth units: ft Wellholedepth: 105 Wellholedepth units: ft Ground -water levels, Number of Measurements: 3 Feet below Feet to Feet below Feet to Date Surface Sealevel Date Surface Sealevel 1987-04-10 79.73 1986-05-27 84.90 Note: A nearby site that taps the same aquifer was being pumped 1977-04-08 76 USGS40001253088 TC4165293.2s Page A-32 GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON AREA RADON INFORMATION Federal EPA Radon Zone for KING County: 3 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L. Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 98003 Number of sites tested: 2 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Living Area - 1st Floor 0.150 pCi/L 100% 0% 0% Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement 0.100 pCi/L 100% 0% 0% TC4165293.2s Page A-33 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5' Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high -resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4165293.2s Page PSGRA PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Wells Source: Department of Health Telephone: 360-236-3148 Group A and B well locations. Water Well Listing Source: Public Utility District Telephone: 206-779-7656 A listing of water well locations in Kitsap County. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION Oil and Gas Well Listing Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: 360-902-1450 Locations that represent oil and gas test well sites in Washington State from 1890 to present. RADON Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey TC4165293.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4165293.2s Page PSGR-3 APPENDIX G Qualifications of Environmental Professionals Jessica Stone Senior Project Scientist Expertise Natural Resource Management Phase I and ll Environmental Site Assessments and Investigations Environmental Services Data and Technical Document Review Education Groundwater Pollution and Hydrology Course — Princeton Groundwater, 2009 Jessica is a senior project scientist with more than 6 years of experience supporting a diverse range of projects involving environmental site investigations, permitting, wetland and sensitive area delineation and mitigation, and construction monitoring and management. She works with clients to identify potential site constraints such as environmental site contamination and wetland and critical area impacts and develops effective solutions for their avoidance, mitigation and/or remediation. Her environmental experience includes Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), soil and groundwater sampling, construction monitoring, and contamination removal. Edgewood Sewer Alignment Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Investigations, City of Edgewood, WA. Jessica conducted three Phase I ESAs and an environmental site investigation for the City of Edgewood to determine potential project impacts within the proposed sewer alignment. The Phase I ESAs were conducted on three properties for proposed pump stations and included reviews of facility and regulatory agency files, site operational histories, and physical site conditions to assess potential conditions of environmental concern that could pose a liability to the City. For the Phase II ESA, Jessica collected soil and groundwater samples to evaluate contamination from adjacent gasoline stations and dry cleaners. During project construction, Jessica conducted soil screening, wastewater and soil characterization for disposal, and directed the trench dam placement to prevent contaminant movement from within the completed sewer alignment. M.S., Forestry, Cal Poly — Harrison Avenue Phase I and II Environmental Site Investigation; City of Olympia, WA. As a San Luis Obispo, 2008 project scientist, Jessica conducted a Phase I and Phase II ESA for the City of Olympia's B.S., Natural Resources Harrison Avenue road improvement project. The Phase I ESA identified a historical gas Management, Cal Poly— station; Jessica used ground -penetrating radar to identify any potential underground San Luis Obispo, 2002 storage tanks (USTs) and sampled soil and groundwater to identify any potential releases of petroleum product. Jessica documented the removal of a UST, supervised the contaminated soil removal and characterization for disposal, and collected confirmation samples. She coordinated the clean-up effort and documentation directly with the Washington State Department of Ecology and Thurston County Health Department. Des Moines Transportation Gateway Project; Des Moines, WA. Jessica conducted a corridor -wide screening level ESA and investigated potential critical areas for the roadway improvements. She investigated 71 properties to determine their potential impacts to the project. Based on the corridor study results, four properties have been recommended for Phase I ESAs, and two have been recommended for Phase II ESAs based on their known or observed environmental conditions. City of Tacoma, 35th Street Landfill Environmental Investigation; Tacoma, WA. Landau Associates conducted an environmental investigation on the 35th Street Landfill for the City of Tacoma to determine the feasibility of site development. Jessica coordinated all field activities and directed a three -person team in sampling and excavating 12 test pits, one 80- foot boring, and eight geoprobes, installing eight methane wells, and sampling surface water. Results were evaluated using compliance statistics that were compared to Model Toxics Control Act clean-up standards. Enticknap, Snyder, and Bridges Property Evaluations; City of Federal Way, WA. Project manager for Phase I ESAs and critical area evaluations on three properties totaling 37 acres at the request of the City of Federal Way for the preservation of riparian and wetland areas of Hylebos Creek. A site evaluation was conducted of all properties, to include historical and local information review, interviews with local and regulatory agencies, and interviews with property owners for the Phase I ESAs. Four wetland complexes and 13 streams were identified, delineated, and rated on these properties. This information allowed the City to evaluate these properties for purchase in order to protect the critical areas they contained. Tim Syverson, L.G. Senior Associate Expertise Tim is the environmental due diligence/Phase I and II Environmental Site Due Diligence & Risk Assessment (ESA) practice lead for Landau Associates. He has more than 20 years of consulting experience focused on project development and management for Management various regional, national, and international industrial, governmental, and retail Environmental Site clients — including Daniels Real Estate, Wilbur -Ellis Company, Crop Production Assessments and Services, The Boeing Company, the Washington State Department of Investigations Transportation (WSDOT), and Home Depot USA, Inc. His work for these clients has included property assessments including due diligence for property acquisition or Regulatory Analysis/Agency divestiture, the design and implementation of subsurface investigations, Negotiations development of remedial strategies and identification of appropriate cleanup Site Characterization & levels, and working with the project team engineer in the design and Remediation implementation of corrective actions. Project Management North Lot Development, LLC/Daniels Real Estate, Qwest/Century Link Field North Lot; Seattle, WA. Tim is the project manager for environmental services in support of the purchase, cleanup, and re -development of the 3.85-acre North Lot parking Education lot. The scope of work to date has included a Phase I ESA, reviewing relevant historical facility and regulatory documents, focused Phase 11 soil and groundwater M.S., Geology, Western sampling and analysis to address data gaps identified during the Phase I ESA, Washington University, 1984 supplemental drilling and sampling to complete a MTCA Remedial Investigation and B.S., Geology, University of Feasibility Study (RI/FS), preparation and implementation of a Cleanup Action Plan Minnesota, Duluth, 1981 (CAP). The RI/FS and draft CAP were completed under the Ecology Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). The final CAP and the Cleanup Action was implemented under a Prospective Purchaser Consent Decree negotiated with Ecology. Registration/Certification Home Depot USA, On -Call Environmental Services; Various Sites, OR and WA. Licensed Geologist/ Project manager for ongoing support for this major retail developer for property Hydrogeologist: Washington, acquisition and site redevelopment. Services include Phase I and 11 due diligence No. 901 assessments for property acquisition, characterization of soil and groundwater in Registered Professional the areas where hazardous substances have been released to the environment, evaluation of the regulatory status of the released substances, quantification of the Geologist: Oregon, liabilities associated with future potential cleanup actions and onsite management No. G1342 of hazardous substances during site development. Projects in Oregon include assessment of sites in Hermiston, The Dalles, Newport, and Eugene. Phase I and II ESAs, Soil Remedial Action — Aerospace Facility; Kent, WA. Project manager for a due diligence assessment for potential sale or lease of a more than 100-acre industrial facility. The assessment included review of facility and regulatory agency files, site operational history, and physical site conditions to assess potential conditions of environmental concern that could pose a liability to the client or future owners/lessees. The results of the initial assessment were used to develop a work plan for site investigations to document current site conditions and evaluate potential conditions of environmental concern. The Phase I assessment, preparation of a Phase II work plan, and completion of the Phase II field investigations were conducted in a 2-month period to meet the client's due diligence schedule. An independent cleanup of soil was contracted under the Voluntary Cleanup Program, and a No Further Action determination was received from the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). LANDAU ASSOCIATES Tim Syverson, L.G. Phase I and II ESAs and Underground Storage Tank (UST) Removals for 10 Former Page 2 Gasoline Station Properties; Various Locations, OR and WA. Project manager for site assessment and closure, many including expanded Phase I ESAs with supplemental soil and groundwater sampling and analysis, the decommissioning and removal of UST systems, collecting soil confirmation samples for analysis, and preparing site characterization reports. The work was conducted to assess soil and groundwater conditions for the potential presence of petroleum hydrocarbons and/or their byproducts, and to ensure compliance with Ecology Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) cleanup levels. Landau Associates also provided oversight of the UST removal and collected confirmation samples to ensure compliance with state regulations. Wilbur -Ellis Company On -Call Environmental Services; OR and WA. Project manager for environmental services for this national agricultural chemical, fertilizer distribution, and supply company. Services include support related to property sale or acquisition, characterization of soil and groundwater, hazardous materials handling and disposition, and regulatory compliance. Projects in Oregon include assessment of facilities in Portland, Jefferson, and Woodburn. WSDOT On -Call Hazardous Waste Services; Various Sites, WA. Project manager for environmental services provided to WSDOT in support of various road improvement projects. The work to date has included underground storage tank (UST)/aboveground storage tank (AST) decommissioning and follow-on remedial actions, as needed; site assessment and inspection work in support of property acquisition for roadway rights -of -way; and expedited support for handling and appropriate disposal of potentially hazardous materials encountered during roadway projects. Environmental Claim Evaluations, Confidential Client, 31 sites; WA, OR, ID, AZ, and CA. Project manager for preparation of site assessments and summaries of 164 environmental claims at agricultural chemical sites in multiple states. The work included reviewing available site -specific soil and groundwater analytical data collected by the previous operation in the context of applicable state and federal regulations and preparing summary reports for each claim. The work was completed to support a cost allocation and liability settlement with the previous owner/operator to meet the terms of the client's purchase agreement. LANDAU ASSOCIATES Author: Sarah Amell Allie Taylor, Scott Pierson Kenny Gunn Title of Report: Cultural Resources Assessment for the William J. Meers Homestead, Federal Way, King County, Washington Date of Report: 19 May 2017 County(ies): King Section: 32 Township: 21 NRange: 04E Quad: Poverty Bay Acres: PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) N Yes Historic Property Inventory Forms to be Approved Online? Yes I I No Archaeological Site s /Isolates Found or Amended? M Yes D No TCP s found? Yes M No Replace a draft? n Yew No Satis a DAHP Archaeolo ical Excavation Permit re uirement? Yes # Na Were Human Remains Found? F1 Yes DAHP Case # M No DAHP Archaeological Site #: RECEIVED JUN 12 2017 C11' OF FEDERAL WAY COM.MU iI Y DEVELOPMENT • Submission of PDFs is required. • Please be sure that any PDF submitted to DAHP has its cover sheet, figures, graphics, appendices, attachments, correspondence, etc., compiled into one single PDF file. • Please check that the PDF displays correctly when opened. Cultural Resource Assessment for the Demolition of the William J. Meers Homestead, Federal Way, King County, Washington Prepared for: City of Federal Way 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 ATCRC Report No. KI-01-17 DAHP Project No. 2016-07-04887 May 19, 2017 Prepared by: Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants 8525 Stoney Creek Lane SW Olympia, WA 98512 www.AquaTerraCRC.com Sarah J. Amell, M.M.A., RPA Principal Investigator Allie R. Taylor, MSc, Project Archaeologist Scott Pierson, MA, Project Archaeologist Kenny Gunn, Historic Preservation Specialist Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary....................................................................................................................... 1 ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................... 1 RegulatoryCompliance ................................................ .. ................................................................ 2 Consultation.................................................................................................................................... 2 Areaof Potential Impact................................................................................................................. 3 BackgroundResearch..................................................................................................................... 4 EnvironmentalSetting............................................................................................................ 4 CulturalSetting....................................................................................................................... 6 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Studies and Sites ................................................... 7 CulturalResources Fieldwork....................................................................................................... 10 Expectations.......................................................................................................................... 10 FieldInvestigation............................................................................................................... 10 Results and Recommendations..................................................................................................... 22 ReferencesCited........................................................................................................................... 23 Appendix A: William J. Meers House and Farm Historic Documentation ................................. 26 Appendix B: Historic Property Inventory Forms......................................................................... 27 Appendix C: Archaeological Site File......................................................................................... 28 Figures Figure 1. Project location USGS Poverty Bay Quad 7.5 min Map 1997....................................... 5 Figure 2. Meers House Fieldwork Sketch map............................................................................. 12 Figure 3. In -ruin barn and addition overview facing southwest ................................................... 13 Figure 4. Overview of cistern and structure facing west.............................................................. 13 Figure 5. Pump house structure overview facing northeast.......................................................... 14 Figure 6. Meers House structure overview facing east................................................................. 14 Figure 7. Shop Shed structure overview facing northeast............................................................ 15 Figure 8. Apple shed structure overview facing east.................................................................... 15 Figure 9. Overview of SP 1 facing northeast, barn on right.......................................................... 16 Figure10. Planar view of SP1...................................................................................................... 16 Figure 11. Brick found in SP1 20-40 cmbs, stamped FAR WEST ............................................... 17 Figure 12. Brick pathway overview facing south/down............................................................... 17 Figure 13. Example bricks from brick pathway both stamped"WaCo......................................... 18 Figure 14. Example of non -diagnostic materials found in shovel probes ..................................... 18 Cultural Resource Assessment for the Demolition of the William J. Meers Homestead, Federal Way, King County, Washington Executive Summary Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants (ATCRC) was contracted by the City of Federal Way Surface Water Management Division (SWM) to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the proposed demolition of the William J. Meers Homestead structures at the site address of 36818 8ffi Ave S., King County WA (Tax Parcel No. 3221049112). This assessment also includes the intensive mitigation recordation of the Meers Homestead structure pursuant to the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) Level 1 and 2 mitigation recordation guidelines. The structures to be demolished include one cistern building, an in ruin barn, two sheds, a well pump house, and the 1890 Meers Homestead structure. The property was acquired by SWM to preserve the high valued riparian habitat and wetlands within the Hylebos Basin. SWM's conservation program plans to restore the property back to its natural condition and allow it to remain as undeveloped conservation land. In the future the City may propose the use of the area as a trail head for a large trail system throughout the conservation area within Spring Valley. Regulatory compliance for this project will be managed by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); SEPA requires cultural resources to be considered during the public environmental review process. In accordance with SEPA, ATCRC's cultural resource assessment included background research, field survey, and preparation of this report. All structures in the project area are considered historic and have been recorded on Historic Property Inventory forms prepared by Summit Solutions Group and an Archaeological Site Form completed by ATCRC. The cistern building, in -ruin barn, two sheds and well pump house are not recommended as significant cultural resources; however the Meers Homestead structure is a National Register eligible structure and will be subject to demolition. No significant cultural resources were encountered during the archaeological field survey, however there is high probability of encountering buried intact historic resources that may be associated with the Meers structure during project excavation, therefore ATCRC recommends cultural resource monitoring by a qualified archaeologist, and preparation and compliance with an Inadvertent Discovery Plan during future demolition and excavation associated with the project. Project Description SWM iseroposing the removal of existing structures located in Federal Way, Washington at 36818 8t Ave S, King County, WA (Tax Parcel No. 3221049112). The primary existing structure slated for removal, known as the Meers Homestead, was built in 1890. All other structures on the property, including one cistern building, a barn, two sheds, and a well pump house are slated for demolition. The property was acquired with SWM's Hylbos Creek Conservation Property Program with the intent to preserve high value riparian habitat and wetlands within the Hylebos Basin. Once properties are acquired, existing structures are demolished and parcels are restored to a natural condition and allowed to remain as undeveloped Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 1 conservation land. A future SWM project proposal suggests possible use of the Meers Homestead site as a small trailhead for a larger trail system throughout conservation properties within the Spring Valley, but no further detail is available at this time. SWM contacted ATCRC requesting cultural resource service assistance documenting the Meers house structure pursuant to a combination of DAHP Level 1 and 2 Mitigation Documentation standards; completion of a cultural resource survey of areas surrounding the structures that will be subject to disturbance from project construction, and preparation of one Washington State Archaeological Site Form and multiple Historic Property Inventory Forms to record the associated outbuildings on the parcel. Regulatory Compliance This project was conducted, in part, to satisfy regulatory requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). SEPA requires that impacts to cultural resources be considered during the public environmental review process. Under SEPA, the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) is the sole agency with technical expertise in regard to cultural resources and provides formal opinions to local governments and other state agencies on a site's significance and the impact of proposed projects upon such sites. In addition, the State of Washington requires compliance with the cultural resources management laws and regulations under the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 27.53 Archaeological Sites and Resources, RCW 27.44 Indian Graves and Records, and RCW 68.50.645 Skeletal Human Remains Duty to Notify. The latter regulation provides a strict process for notification of law enforcement and other interested parties in the event of the discovery of any human remains, regardless of inferred cultural affiliation. Consultation SWM contacted the King County Historic Preservation Program during property acquisition and again following acquisition regarding the historic status of the homestead. The King County Preservation Architect completed a building assessment of the Meers Homestead and the adjacent structures on the property. The Preservation Architect confirmed that the Meers Homestead is listed in the King County Historic Resource Inventory (HRI 1894) and determined that the structure is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (July 2016). The Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) concurred with the determination of eligibility, citing criteria A as the property reflects the rural and agricultural history of southern King County. DAHP also cited criteria C as the house itself is a very rare vertical plank structure, one of very few remaining in King County. DAHP was consulted by SWM (October 2016) and recommended intensive recordation of the structure, with the following comment (Griffith 2016): Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 2 "Following are some more specific comments and recommendations for your consideration to implement: 1) Recordation: We recommend a meticulous recordation effort of the house; here is a link to our mitigation recordation standards: hn://dahp.wa.gov/sitesldefaufdfilcs/Miti,eationDocumentationStandards_l.ndf. While we do not think the Meers House needs to be coordinated with the National Park Service, we do think it is important to have a historic preservation professional produce line drawings of the house supplemented with photography and narrative... in essence a combination of DAHP Levels I and II. We recommend that the selected consultant be in contact with DAHP staff and Todd Scott to specify specific tasks and elements for the documentation. 2) Salvage: Again, given the plank construction and level of integrity, we recommend that instead of just demolishing and hauling materials to the landfill, that the house be deconstructed, documented (in part to assist in doing #1), and materials salvaged and hopefully re -used elsewhere. Selected materials should be offered to other entities working to preserve structures of this same era such as the Historical Society of Federal Way. 3) Archaeology: Since the property has not been surveyed for archaeological resources, we recommend a survey be undertaken by a qualified archaeologist to assess the presence and location of archaeological resources on the property (hgp://dahp.wa.gov/survey-inventory). Resources that could be disturbed by the building removal and trailhead construction will require an archaeological excavation permit issued by DAHP to guide that recovery effort (ho://dahp.wa.gov/archaeological-permitting). 4) Interpretation: We recommend that materials generated or identified in 1, 2, and 3 be incorporated into a public interpretation effort such as a display, website, or signage either on -site and/or elsewhere in the city such as at the Historical Society, City Hall, transit stations, mall, or elsewhere that receives a lot of public exposure. DAHP also recommended a "memorandum of understanding (MOU) be drafted to bring greater specificity about the mitigation effort and defining specific tasks and products that result from this effort. In January 2017 the SWM continued consultation with the King County Historic Preservation Department, and King County recommended that the water cistern on the property be recorded on a Historic Property Inventory form before demolition. On April 10, 2017 the City of Federal Way and ATCRC participated in a phone conference with DAHP regarding the project, and DAHP recommended that in addition to the other tasks recommended during previous consultation, the other structures on the property should be recorded on Historic Property Inventory forms, with the exception of the in ruin barn, which should be recorded on a Washington State Archaeological Site Form. Furthermore, the intact brick walkway observed during field survey should be addressed by mention in the cultural resource assessment report (pers. communication, Griffith, G. April 10, 2017) Area of Potential Impact The Area of Potential Impact (API) for this project covers approximately 2.00 acres at 36818 8tn Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 (parcel 322104-9112, NW 1/4 NE '/4 Section 32 Township 21N Range 04E) (Figure 1). The project API hosts the Meers homestead structure, a well pump house, cistern building, two sheds, and an in ruin partially burned barn with a modern addition. SWM purchased this property to preserve natural riparian and wetland habitat within the Hylebos Basin. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 3 Background Research ATCRC's review included project files, local geologic data, and cultural resources records available on DAHP's Washington Information System for Architectural and Archaeological Records Data (WISAARD) database, the King County Historic Preservation Program, university libraries, local history museums, public records, private manuscript collections, online General Land Office records, published (secondary) sources, Sanborn fire insurance maps, and other relevant repositories. Environmental Setting The API is located in Federal Way, WA, within the southern end of the Puget Lowland. The Puget Lowland is a physiographic province that was shaped by several periods of extensive glaciation during the Pleistocene (Lasmanis 1991). The Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation began around 18,000 before present (BP) with an advance of the Cordilleran ice sheet into the lowlands (Porter and Swanson 1998). The Puget Lobe of the ice sheet flowed down into the Puget Lowland and reached its terminus just south of Olympia between 14,500 and 14,000 BP (Clague and James 2002). The Puget Lobe began to retreat shortly after reaching its terminus. Marine waters entered the lowlands that had been carved out by the glacier and filled Puget Sound. The remaining ice was floated and wasted away rapidly. Glaciomarine drift deposits were released from the melting glacial ice and deposited on the sea floor across the northern and central Puget Lowland causing the land to rebound and relative sea levels to fall and expose glacial outwash deposits (Clague and James 2002). About 11,600 to 10,000 BP, the Cordilleran ice sheet advanced once again leaving glacial till and outwash deposits in much of northwestern Washington (Easterbrook 2003). Sediments were deposited and often reworked as glaciers advanced and retreated and glacial till and outwash deposits were left across much of the region at the end of the last glacial period (Snyder et al. 1973). The API is located about 3.66 miles northwest of the Puyallup River, is crossed by the North Fork of West Hylebos Creek, and is situated near several ponds and associated wetlands. The Natural Resource Conservation Service web soil survey records two soil units within the project area, Alderwood gravelly sandy loam and Tukwila muck (MRCS 2017). A majority (84.5%) of the API is located within the Alderwood gravelly sandy loam complex derived from glacial drift and/or glacial outwash over dense glaciomarine deposits parent material and is formed on ridges or hills. A typical profile of this soil unit includes the following layers; 0-7 inches of gravelly sandy loam, followed by several layers of very gravelly sandy loam. The soil is typically well drained and fairly deep as restrictive features are reached around 20 to 39 inches below surface. The northwest corner of the project area is represented by the Tukwila muck soil unit which is formed from herbaceous organic material on flood plains. A typical soil profile of this unit includes 0-19 inches of much and 19-60 inches of stratified diatomaceous earth to muck. This soil type is very poorly drained and is extremely deep as restrictive features are not reached until more than 80 inches below surface. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 4 Figure 1. Project location USGS Poverty Bay Quad 7.5 min Map 1997. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 5 Cultural Setting Puget Sound lowland archaeology can be divided into three phases that include early (end of the last ice age to 5,000 years before present (BP), middle (5,000 to 1,000 BP) and late stages of development (1,000 to 250 BP). The early period is characterized by an emphasis on the use of flaked stone tools that included fluted projectile points, leaf -shaped points and cobble -derived tools. Camps were frequently established along river terraces or outwash channels and exist today as near surface scatters or shallow buried sites. The middle period coincides with a stabilization of the environment to something similar to today. The broad cultural patterns include a larger suite of tools including smaller notched points and ground stone, bone or antler implements used for working with wood. Shell midden sites first appear during this period indicating a transition to a more maritime -based subsistence pattern. The late period is dominated by settlement pattern along the coastline and along streams and rivers and far greater specialization of technology. Trade goods also appear indicating extensive trade networks up and down the coast as well as with inland plateau neighbors. Salmon became a primary food source at this time as sea levels had risen and riparian environments supported large runs of salmon and provided plentiful food. The API is located in the traditional territories of the Puyallup Tribe, Coast Salish speakers of the southern dialect of Lushootseed language. The Puyallup Tribe occupied the area from Commencement Bay to the drainages of both the White and Puyallup Rivers (Smith 1940). Like other Puget Sound Coast Salish people, the Puyallup practiced seasonal mobility moving in the spring and summer to procure resources and living in permanent communal cedar -plank houses throughout the winter. The main Puyallup village (S'Puyallupabsh) was located near the mouth of the Puyallup River approximately 5.5 miles to the southwest of the API (Suttles and Lane 1990, Smith 1940). The extensive types of landforms within the Puyallup's territory allowed them to follow seasonal rounds to procure resources and to make use of the entire landscape by building weirs and traps in Clear, Hylebos, and Wapato Creeks, digging shellfish, collecting acorns, roots, bulbs, berries, red cedar bark for basketry material, cattails and tulles for mats, as well as hunting deer, elk, geese, and duck. The closest recorded ethnographic place name to the API, "XaxtL!", was recorded by Waterman (1930) on the east side of Hylebos Creek approximately two miles to the west of the API. This place name is interpreted as "brushy" for Hylebos creek (Waterman 2001). Several more ethnographic place names are recorded farther to the West and South surrounding the Puyallup River, Commencement Bay, and Wapato Creek (Waterman 2001). No ethnographic places are recorded within the API. The William J. Meers House & Farm is significant as one of the few surviving historic homesteads present in the rural portion of Federal Way, Washington. The unique style and form of vertical plank construction of the historic house along with the collection of historic resources present on the farm reflect the vernacular building tradition of homesteads of this type. Although there is Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 6 little information known about the function of the property over the last 125 years, it has been owned and inhabited by several different individuals and families resulting in a dynamic history that includes many alterations and additions. The property was included in a Homestead Land Claim Patent filed by William J. Mccrs, which was approved on November 23, 1891 (Reference Number: WASAA 071629). Although the King County Department of Assessments dates the house as 1890, it is assumed that construction would not have begun until late-1891, at the earliest, once the land patent had been filed. Although the exact construction date cannot be confirmed, the style and form of the Meers House coincides with the methods of construction during this time period in the Pacific Northwest. William J. Meers was born on February 8, 1866 in California to Mary and William Meers. William had multiple siblings and eventually made his was to Washington State by his early twenties. On October 22, 1888, shortly before building the Meers House, he married Josephine Martin when he was 22 years old and they had their only child a year later on September 10, 1889 named Sadie Meers. It is unknown if Meers built the house himself or had it commissioned, however it is assumed that is was constructed to serve as his family house. By 1900, King County property and tax records show the original 30-acre parcel as being subdivided into two separate 10 and 20 acre tracts, although an individual by the name of "M.A. Blouvelt" paid all of the taxes for the property through 1930. M.A., or Martha, is Josephine Martin's, William's wife, sister who was married to a Charles Blouvelt. Both the Meer's and Blouvelt's lived on the property through the 1930's with several census records listing Charles Meers as a "General Farmer" at the address, although the Blouvelt's pay the entire parcels taxes based on records. According to 1934 property and tax records, the William J. Meers House was sold to H.D. Maxwell and Elizabeth Davies. There are several references to a barn fire in 1937 that completely destroyed the barn on the property and that a new barn was built in its place. This may mean that the current barn is the 1937 barn, although this has not been confirmed. Based on the limited documentation and historic photographs available for the property, it is difficult to date all of the alterations and additions that have been made to the Meers House. Based on historic photographs, it has been confirmed that the open front porch on the south elevation was enclosed by 1959 which would have occurred during the ownership of Davies and Maxwell. The Meers House and Farm was purchased by William Larson in 1964 from Elizabeth Davies. Larson would live in the house for decades and eventually the house and farm would be deeded to his descendants listed as Margaret Justice, Anna Butler, Mary Stobie, James Phillips, and Phillip Larson. The descendants of William Larson sold the house and farm to the SWM in December 2015; the City is listed as the current owner and is managing the resource as a vacant property. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Studies and Sites The DAHP WISAARD database was accessed to determine if the API had been previously surveyed and if any archaeological sites, ethnographic places, historic buildings, historic properties, or cultural resources were recorded in the vicinity of the API. The DAHP statewide predictive model records the API as a moderate risk area for encountering cultural resources, with survey recommended. The API has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources, and is located one mile from previous assessments (Figure 4). Four archaeological sites are also recorded in the project vicinity. Site PI0177, located 0.87 miles to the southwest of the project area, and consists of a pre -contact isolate, a broken flaked jasper Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 7 cobble. Site PI01408, located approximately one mile southeast of the API consists of a railroad grade through the town of Milton built in 1902-1926. Site KI1021, the Spring Valley Service Station, is located 0.51 miles to the west of the API. This site contains two foundations from the Spring Valley Service Station that was in operation between 1930 and 1965 and a historic trash scatter. The final site is the Gethsemane Cemetery (KI00866) which contains both a historic structure's concrete foundation built ca. pre-1967 and a cemetery. The site is located 0.62 miles to the southwest of the project API. Two cemeteries were found within the one mile research radius of the project area. Gethsemane Cemetery, mentioned above was established in 1975 as a catholic cemetery. St. Georges Cemetery is located 0.66 miles to the southwest of the API which was associated with the St. George Indian School and was established in 1886. The cemetery is currently overgrown with no road access and is owned by the Puyallup Tribe. A total of twelve previous cultural resource assessments were completed within one mile of the William J. Meers House property. A majority of these projects were completed for road improvement projects. Historic sites and non -diagnostic debris were encountered at a number of the project locations while one project uncovered a lithic isolate. No further archaeological work was recommended at any of the following project areas. Table 1. Previous cultural resources studies conducted within a one -mile radius of the API. Author Title Cultural Project Proximity Materials Recommendations to API Encountered Luttrell, Cultural Resources Non -diagnostic No further 0.82 miles Charles T. Investigations for historic/modern archaeological southeast 2003 Washington State debris assessment Department of Transportation's SR 161: Milton Way to South 360th Street Project Forsman, PAAGA Property Historic Bridge No further 0.45 miles Leonard A. Conceptual Mitigation Plan archaeological southwest 2003 Archaeological Resources assessment Assessment Sparks and Letter to Tom Whitney Historic glass No further 0.11 miles Montgomery Regarding a DRAFT archaeological west 2005 Archaeological and assessment Historical Resources Survey for the Spring Valley Restoration Proiect Bard, James FINAL REPORT: Cultural None No further 0.88 miles C. 2006 Resources Discipline archaeological northeast Report for I-5 SR 161/SR assessment 18 Triangle Improvements Livingston Addendum to the I-5 to SR None No further 0.25 miles and Cowen 161/SR18 Triangle archaeological north 2008 Improvements Cultural assessment Resources Discipline Report Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 8 Author Title Cultural Project Proximity Materials Recommendations to API Encountered Boersema, A Cultural Resource Survey PI0177, Jasper No further 0.92 miles Jana L. 2010 of Clerget Industries Shatter archaeological southwest Highway 99 Parcel, Milton assessment Rooke, Lara An Archaeological KI1021, Spring No further 0.57 miles 201 la Assessment for the Valley Service archaeological southwest Proposed Spring Valley Station assessment Underground Storage Tank foundations and Site glass, metal and lumber debris Rooke, Lara Archaeological Monitoring KI1021, historic No further 0.50 miles 201 lb Report for the Spring debris associated archaeological southwest Valley Underground with Spring assessment Storage Tank Site Removal Valley Service Project Station, historic lass bottles Riser 2013 Cultural Resources Survey, None No further 0.23 miles SR 99 West Fork Hylebos archaeological northeast Creek Culvert Replacement assessment Project Baldwin, Cultural Resources None No further 0.71 miles Garth 2014 Assessment for the Pacific archaeological northeast Highway South HOV Lanes assessment Phase V (S 340th Street to S 359th Street) Project, Federal Way Chambers, Cultural Resources PTO 1408, Former No further 0.89 miles Jennifer 2009 Assessment for the City of railbed archaeological east Edgewood, Meridian assessment Avenue Sewer LID No.I Improvement Project Baldwin, Cultural Resources None No further 0.77 miles Garth 2015 Assessment for the South archaeological north 356th Street Roadway assessment Improvements Project, Federal Wav A total of 144 historic properties are recorded within a one mile radius of the project. There are no properties recorded on the National Register of Historic Places or the Washington Heritage Register within one mile of the API, although the Williams J. Meers House has been previously determined eligible for listing on the National Register. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 9 Cultural Resources Fieldwork On 23 March 2017 ATCRC completed a cultural resources field investigation of the API. Historic property inventories of the eligible single family dwelling, the Meer's house and outbuildings were completed by Summit while an archaeology site form was completed by ATCRC for the in -ruin barn on the property. Expectations Based on ATCRC's review of local cultural resource studies and environmental and cultural contexts, the API is considered to be located in an area of moderate probability for encountering cultural resources. The location of the property and its proximity to Hylebos Creek and a concentration of ethnographic places to the south and west of the project area suggest excavation within the vicinity of the API may impact unrecorded subsurface archaeological deposits. Thorough pedestrian survey and sub -surface testing were necessary to study potential project impacts. Field Investigation On March 23, 2017, ATCRC staff performed field investigations that included pedestrian and subsurface survey. For the pedestrian survey, the entire API was visually inspected with 10- meter north -south transects. The landform is a terrace situated southwest of a wetlands area. The terrace slopes gently from the house to the barn at the southern end of the property. The landform slopes sharply downward into the wetland about 5 meters south of the pump house. Vegetation on the landform includes grasses, dandelions, blackberries, Douglas fir, vine maple, sugar pine, apple, and ivy. Cultural materials of modern and undetermined age were observed across the landform, including wood fragments, brick fragments, plywood, and flat glass. The material was more densely concentrated around the existing structures. A partially intact brick pathway, measuring 5 meters north to south and 1.5 meters east to west, was observed between the front yard of the main house and a water pump near a large Douglass fir tree east of the existing driveway (Figure 2 and Figure 12). The brick pathway is composed of a single course of approximately 50 bricks. Two brick types imprinted "FAR WEST" and `WA Co" were observed (Figure 11 and Figure 13). While exact dates of these bricks were hard to discern as the sources of start and end dates of production are not reliable, it is evident that the company produced bricks in the early 1900s with a boom in the business from 1910s to 1920s as it was deemed the "Largest Exclusive Fireproofing Plant in the Pacific Northwest" by The Clay Worker in 1911 and mentioned several times in later issues of The Clay Worker (The Clay Worker, 1911 and Trautwein Dryers 1914). Online blogs suggest the Far West Clay Company opened between 1906 and 1908 in Clay City, WA when the Far West Timber Company purchased 320 acres of clay -laden land and started building kilns (Spadoni 2012). Around the 1930s during the Great Depression, the then Far West Brick and Tile Company continued sporadically and only recorded 14 clay workers in the census (Spadoni 2012). In 1944, the company changed hands and name to the Builders Brick Company (Spadoni 2012). No diagnostic information could be found on the bricks stamped with "WA CO". Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 10 A total of 12 shovel probes (SPs) were placed at the discretion of the archaeologist across the property (Figure 2). Two SPs were excavated in the vicinity of each existing structure (the barn, the apple shed, the shop shed, the cistern building, the main house, and the pump house). No prehistoric cultural material was identified during the subsurface survey. Only one SP (SP-1 located west of the barn structure) tested positive for historic cultural material (Figure 9-Figure 11). Three intact bricks of the same make, two of which were imprinted "FAR WEST" were recovered at 20-40 cmbs. Cultural material was recovered in other SPs (SP-2, SP-3, SP-7, SP-8, SP-10, and SP-11); however, this material (including wire nails, brick fragments, glass fragments, ceramic fragments) was either determined to be younger than 50 years old or non - diagnostic of age during the survey (Figure 14). In addition to the visual reconnaissance and subsurface testing an archaeology site form (Appendix C) was prepared by ATCRC for the in -ruin barn on the property. The barn is assumed to have been constructed circa 1940 and is mostly collapsed with the only remaining material being the primary support posts, roofing supports and wood shingles, and vertical cladding boards primarily along the west elevation that combine to resemble that of a historic barn. The rectangular planned main barn features a double height (approximately 25 ft. high) central volume that appears to have been flanked by a single height (approximately 10 ft. high) space on either side (north and south). The historic barn is supported by a framework of large posts that extend from ground to roof, (three on each side of the double height ceiling), many of which are rough cut and appear to have been minimally planed after being fallen trees. Some of the smaller supporting beams for the roof and horizontal supports also were roughly cut and likely were fallen trees or trees cut on the property that were not stripped of their bark. The vertical siding was nailed directly into the supporting beams. The roof of the double height ceiling section of the barn is a wooden shingled high gable with the single height ceiling sections containing likely a wooden shingled shed shaped single pitch roof that slopes from a high to lower wall. The main barn has three additions, two on the east side and one on the west side. A smaller balloon framed structure is adjacent to the barn on the east side at the southern end of the main structure, this addition measured approximately 20 ft. x 12 ft. x 9 ft. This structure is covered in horizontal boards and capped by an angled metal roof. Another addition on the east side of the main barn at the northern end of the barn has a shed shaped metal roof with vertical cladding boards. The addition on the western side of the barn was likely of the same make as the single height ceiling sections of the main barn. The dimensions of the last two additions mentioned above as well as the exact layout of the ban were difficult to determine due to the barn being in rein and the overgrowth of blackberries and stinging nettle. Although the barn is historic in its own right, there are notations that the original barn burned in the late 1930s implying that this may be a replacement built in its place circa 1940. The Barn could be significant based upon its style and association with the homestead as a whole; however it is heavily deteriorated and nearing ruined status due to neglect and previous fire and does not retain integrity. It would be difficult to accurately reconstruct or restore the barn to its original form due to the degree of deterioration. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 11 Figure 2. Meers House Fieldwork Sketch map. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 12 Figure 5. Pump house structure overview facing northeast. Figure 6. Meers House structure overview facing east. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 14 Figure 7. Shop Shed structure overview facing northeast. Figure 8. Apple shed structure overview facing east. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 15 Figure 9. Overview of SP1 facing northeast, barn on right. i.r-��yJarram%' K cam' V '•� `�."'�.►.� ..�'�. =� ►.: a S:-� \ � 1�►:�i� �••R � '�t . -:r Ate; �p� ... `_n�'; �i� �•. Figure 10. Planar view of SPl. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 16 Figure 11. Brick found in SPl 20-40 curbs, stamped FAR WEST. Figure 12. Brick pathway overview facing south/down. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 17 Figure 13. Example bricks from brick pathway both stamped "WaCo". A 9 6 7 8 9 ' " 1 T 12 13 44 15 1S 17 18 11 21 22 29 24'25 26 2? 68 29�•7 313j 334 jSH 3737 t:a m tD Figure 14. Example of non -diagnostic materials found in shovel probes. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 18 Historic Property Inventory forms (Appendix B) for the remaining structures (house, pump house, apple shed, shop shed and cistern) were completed by Summit Solutions Group. Table 2. Cultural resources survey results. SP# UTMs Description SP1 5551134/ 0-7 cmbs: grasses, wooden plank on surface 5235465 7-31 cmbs: Dark grayish brown, silty loam, many fine roots, very few medium roots, 10-15% subrounded pebbles, very few cobbles, loose compaction, abrupt boundary 31-43 cmbs: light gray, clay loam, no roots, <5% subrounded pebbles and cobbles, moderately compacted. Cultural Materials 0-20 cmbs: bike chain (n=1), metal drain cover? (n=1), door hinge? (n=1.), unidentified complete metal object (n=1), brick fragments in North Wall (n=3) 20-40 cmbs: intact brick pieces (n=3), two with stamps "Far West", measurements 9x4.25x2.25 in, brick fragments (n=3) measuring 1-4 inches, machine cut nail rounded head (n=1) measured 3 inches. SP2 5511561 0-13cm: Dark brown gravelly sandy loam w/ 15-20% 0-20cm: 6 small white checkered pattern 5235469 subrounded to subangular granules to fist -sized cobbles; fabric fragments (age undetermined) weak, granular structure; clear, wavy boundary; A horizon 13-40cm: Greyish brown sandy clay loam; very gravelly w/ >25% unsorted subrounded to subangular granules to cobbles; few faint orange mottles; likely glacial material SP3 551160/ 0-22cm: Dark brown silt loam w/ 15-20% poorly sorted 0-20cm: 1 colorless flat glass frag (age 5235491 subrounded to subangular granules to pebbles; weak, undetermined; 1 white porcelain frag (age granular structure; clear, wavy boundary; A horizon undetermined) 22-65cm: Yellowish brown loamy sand; very gravelly w/ >25% unsorted subrounded to subangular granules to cobbles; small, distinct orange mottles (22-30 cmbs); root burn, few charcoal fragments at 50-60 cmbs; likely glacial material SP4 551170/ 0-4 cmbs: grasses None 5235503 4-25 cmbs: dark brown, silty loam, 5-10% subrounded- subangular pebbles, very few cobbles, moderately firm compaction, moderate moisture, gradual boundary. 25-40 cmbs: dark reddish brown, medium grained sandy loam, some fine roots, 40-50% subangular to subrounded pebbles, 5% subangular to subrounded cobbles, loose compaction, low moisture, wary boundary. 40-53 cmbs: light grayish brown, medium grained sandy loam, no roots, 40-50% subangular to subrounded pebbles, 5% subangular to subrounded cobbles, loose compaction, low moisture. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 19 SP# UTMs Description Cultural Materials SP5 551153/ 0-20cm: Light brown silt loam w/ —5% subrounded to None 5235505 subangular granules to pebbles; massive structure; gradual, wavy boundary; A horizon 20-47cm: Greyish brown silty clay loam w/ 5-10% poorly sorted subangular to subrounded granules to cobbles; massive; clear, wavy boundary 47-60cm: Yellowish brown loamy sand; very gravelly w/ >25% unsorted subrounded to subangular granules to cobbles; likely glacial material SP6 551158/ 0-7 cmbs: grasses and blackberry bushes None 5235515 7-47 cmbs: dark grayish brown, silty loam, many fine roots, 10-15% subangular to subrounded pebbles, —5% subangular to subrounded cobbles, moderate moisture, moderate compaction, gradual boundary. 47-70 cmbs: light grayish brown, clay loam, no roots, <5% subangular to subrounded pebbles and cobbles, moderate moisture and compaction. SP7 551139/ 5235521 0-26cm: Dark brown sandy loam w/ 3-5% subrounded granules -pebbles; weak, granular; clear, wavy boundary 26-50cm: Yellowish brown loamy sand; very gravelly w/ >25% unsorted subrounded to subangular granules to cobbles; likely glacial material 0-20cm: 2 rounded paving stones (like in situ) @ 9-15cmbs; 10 thin colorless plastic sheeting frags SP8 551140/ 0-4 cmbs: grasses 0-20 cmbs: 1.5 in amber glass bottle 5235533 shard (n=1), 2.5 in complete machine cut 4-26 cmbs: dark brown silty loam, many fine roots, 10- nail with rounded head (n=1) 15% subangular to subrounded pebbles, 5% cobbles, moderate moisture, slightly firm compaction, wavy Modern material boundary. 26-45 cmbs: light grayish brown, clay loam, no roots, <5% subangular to subrounded pebbles and cobbles, moderate compaction, medium moisture. SP9 551129/ 0-10 cmbs: grasses, rhododendron None 5235517 10-25 cmbs: dark brown, silty loam, many fine roots, 10- 15% subangular to subrounded pebbles, no cobbles, loose compaction, moderate moisture, wavy boundary 25-32 cmbs: light gray, clay loam, <5% angular to subrounded pebbles, no cobbles, 3 large roots through center of hole, concrete in east wall. Terminated due to roots and concrete. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 20 SP# UTMs Description Cultural Materials SP10 551121/ 0-30cm: Medium brown silt loam w/ 5-10% subrounded 0-20cm: 1 colorless flat glass frag (age 5235528 granules to pebbles; discontinuous charcoal layer @ 29- undetermined) 32 cmbs; clear, wavy boundary 20-40cm: 1 wire nail (bent, no head), 1 30-55cm: Greyish brown silty clay loam w/ 20% poorly white porcelain frag; 1 small (<1 cm) sorted subangular to subrounded granules to cobbles; brick frag; 1 small flat glass frag terminated at cobble impasse SP11 551144/ 0-35cm: Dark brown silt loam w/ 20% subrounded- 0-20cm: 1 wire nail 5235547 subangular granules to small cobbles; likely disturbed (0- 20 cmbs); large grey clay loam inclusions; clear, irregular boundary 35-60cm: Dark yellowish brown loamy sand; very gravelly w/ >25% unsorted subrounded to subangular granules to cobbles; likelyglacial material SP12 551157/ 0-4 cmbs: grasses and blackberries None 5235551 4-32 cmbs: dark brown silty loam, many fine roots, 10- 15% subangular to subrounded pebbles, 5% cobbles, loose compaction, moderate moisture, gradual boundary 32-42 cmbs: dark brown gravelly silt loam, —50-60% subrounded pebbles, 10% cobbles, loose compaction, and medium moisture. Terminated due to large root through center of hole Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 21 Results and Recommendations Background review suggests the API is located in an area of moderate probability for encountering cultural material. One SP provided evidence for a subsurface cultural deposit of historic bricks recovered 20-40 cmbs. A brick pathway was also encountered on the surface near the house structure historic in nature. The cistern building, in -ruin barn, two sheds and well pump house are not recommended as significant cultural resources; however the Meers Homestead structure is a National Register eligible structure and will be subject to demolition. No significant cultural resources were encountered during the archaeological field survey, however there is high probability of encountering buried intact historic resources that may be associated with the Meers structure during project excavation, therefore ATCRC recommends cultural resource monitoring by a qualified archaeologist, and preparation and compliance with an Inadvertent Discovery Plan during future demolition and excavation associated with the project. No cultural resources study can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for prehistoric sites, historic properties or TCPs associated with a project. The information presented in this report is based on professional opinions derived from our analysis and interpretation of available documents, records, literature and information identified in this report, and on our reconnaissance -level field investigation and observations as described herein. Conclusions and recommendations presented apply to project conditions existing at the time of our study and those reasonably foreseeable. The data, conclusions and interpretations in this report should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions described in this report. They cannot necessarily apply to site changes of which ATCRC is not aware and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 22 References Cited Baldwin, Garth L. 2014 Cultural Resources Assessment for the Pacific Highway South HOV Lanes Phase V (S 340th Street to S 359th Street) Project, Federal Way, King County, Washington. Dryton Archaeology Technical Report Number 0514E. On file at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia Bard, Jim 2006 FINAL REPORT.- Cultural Resources Discipline Report for I-5 SR 161/SR 18 Triangle Improvements. On file at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Boersema, Jana 2010 A Cultural Resource Survey of Clerget Industries Highway 99 Parcel Milton, Pierce County, Washington. Cascadia Archaeology. On file at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia Chambers, Jennifer 2009 Cultural Resources Assessment for the City of Edgewood, Meridian Avenue Sewer LID NO. 1 Improvement Project, Pierce and King Counties, Washington. Cultural Resource Consultants Technical Memo 0807C-2. On file at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia Clague, John J., and Thomas S. James 2002 History and Isostatic Effects of the Last Ice Sheet in Southern British Columbia. Quaternary Science Reviews 21:71-87. Easterbrook, Donald J. 2003 Cordilleran Ice Sheet Glaciation of the Puget Lowland and Columbia Plateau and Alpine Glaciation of the North Cascade Range, Washington. In Western Cordillera and Adjacent Areas, ed. T. W. Swanson, pp. 137-157. Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado. Gunn, Kenny 2017 William J. Me- House and Farm. Summit Solutions Group Project Number AOT- E 17001. Draft Report to be on file at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Kirk, Ruth and Carmela Alexander 1990 Exploring Washington's Past: A Road Guide to History. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA. Lasmanis, Raymond 1991 The Geology of Washington. Rocks and Minerals 66:262-277. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 23 Livingston, Stephanie and Tim Cowen 2008 Addendum to the I-5 to SR 161/SR 18 Triangle Improvements Cultural Resources Discipline Report. Addendum to the I-5 to SR 161/SR 18 Triangle Improvements Cultural Resources Discipline Report. On file at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia Porter, S. C. and T. W. Swanson 1998 Radiocarbon Age Constraints on Rates of Advance and Retreat of the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet During the Last Glaciation. Quaternary Research 50:205-213. Riser, J. Lauran 2013 Cultural Resources Survey, SR 99 West Fork Hylebos Creek Culvert Replacement Project, King County, Washington. On file at the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Rooke, Lara and Tyler McWilliams 2011 a An Archaeological Assessment for the proposed Spring Valley Underground Storage Tank Site, in King County, Washington. AMEC Earth & Environmental Short Report No. 25. Rooke, Lara and Tyler McWilliams 2011 b Archaeological Monitoring Report for the Spring Valley Underground Storage Tank Site Removal Project, King County, Washington. AMEC Earth & Environmental Archaeological Monitoring Report No. 01-2011. Ruby, Robert H., John A. Brown, and Cary C. Collins 2010 A Guide to the Indian Tribes of the Pacific Northwest. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK. Smith, Marian W. 1940 The Puyallup-Nisqually. Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology, Vol. 32, Columbia University Press, New York. Snyder, D.E., Gale, P.S., and Pringle, R.F. 1973 Soil Survey of King County, Washington. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Washington State. Spadoni, Paul and Lucy 2012 Memories of Clay City are fading, but its bricks still strong throughout NW. Blog posting on Living (with) abroad in Tuscany electronic document accessed May 19, 2017 at http://livingwithabroadintuscany.blogspot.com/2012/12/memories-of-clay-city-are- fading-but.html. Spier, Leslie 1936 Tribal Distribution in Washington. General Series in Anthropology, Number 3. George Banta Publishing Company, Menasha, Wisconsin. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 24 Suttles, Wayne and Barbara Lane 1990 Southern Coast Salish. In: Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, pp. 485-502. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 7, W.C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. The Clay Worker 1911 The Clay Worker vol. 55-56. T.A. Randall & Co. Accessed online on May 19, 2017 at https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000528011. Trautwein, Dryers 1914 Brick and Clay Record, Volume 45. Trautwein Dryer ad Engineering Co. Chicago, Illinois. Accessed on May 19, 2017 at https://books.google.com/books?id=MxpbAAAAYAAJ&pg=PAl 140&lpg=PA 1140&dq =far+west+brick+and+tile+company&source=bl&ots=VXJglxts6X&sig=G3 2QXUn3 O9- pubyS4cW9pY90pc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=OahUKEwjr4e_Ny zTAhUFyGMKHVQIDr8 Q6AEIMzAC#v=onepage&q=far%20west&f=false United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1994 Poverty Bay, Washington. 1:24,000. 7.5-Minute Series. USGS, Washington, D.C. Waterman, Thomas T. Ca.1920 Puget Sound Geography. Unpublished manuscript on file at the Pacific Collection, Allen Library, University of Washington, Seattle. 2001 sda?da? g�°e_dibe_le_ucid?acaci_talbi c- Puget Sound Geography. Vi Hilbert, Jay Miller, and Zalmai Zahir, contributing editors. Lushootseed Press, Federal Way. Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 25 Appendix A: William J. Meers House and Farm Historic Documentation Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 26 SUMMIT SO L U T I ON S G R O UP WILLIAM J. M EER5 H ousE & FARM May 15, 2017 Proiect Location: 47.271199,-122.324062 36818 8th Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98003 King County Summit Project Number: AQT-E17001 Washington DAHP Proiect Number: 2016-07-04887 Client: Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Prepared BY: Summit Solutions Group, LLC Principal Investigator: Kenny Gunn M.S. 6600 NE 78th Court, Suite B3 Portland, OR, 97218 503.765.7433 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS 0-P UP, L.1-0 6600 NE 78— COURT, SUITE 83 1 PORTLAND, OR 9721 B I 503.379.4009 PO Box 1 224 I SISTERS, OR I 97759 541.549.6620 WWW.SUMMITSOLUTIONSGROUP.COM 5 LU IMSMRI TGOUP William J. Meers House & Farm • • - Property • - William J. Meers House • - Charles & Martha Blouvelt House • - ' - • Potentially Eligible • - c.1891 • • 1891-1934 1 MR• Domestic/Agriculture • Architecture/Agriculture • • • - 36818 8th Avenue South • Federal Way, Washington 98003 • King • • - 47.271199,-122.324062 • • - 470 16' 16.3164", -1220 19' 26.6226" • • ' - • - - T21 R04E S32 • - 322104-9112 • - - Kenny Gunn - • - - Historic Preservation Specialist • • - Summit Solutions Group, LLC • - May 15, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 5, 20 1 7 SIGNIFICANCE NARRATIVE Statement of Significance Built circa 1891, the William J. Meers House and Farm is locally significant and eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A in the area of Agriculture as one of few remaining settlement -era homestead properties located in the rural area surrounding Federal Way, Washington. The property exhibits cultural landscape integrity, in its overall spatial organization as a farm, response to natural features, circulation and arrangement of building and other structural remains, and materials. Although the historic house has been heavily altered by additions, the overall homestead retains a high -degree of integrity and is one of few known surviving vertical plank constructed resources in the area. The homestead retains integrity of location, setting, design, materials, workmanship (however it should be noted that many of the outbuildings are in a deteriorated condition or ruin status), feeling, and association. The period of significance for the William J. Meers House and Farm, also known as the Charles and Martha Blouvelt House, has been identified as starting in 1891 when the original Homestead Claim was made by Meers and extends through 1934 when the property ownership from Charles and Martha Blouvelt House, relatives of Meers, was transferred to Elizabeth Davies. Narrative The William J. Meers House & Farm is significant as one of the few surviving historic homesteads present in the rural area of Federal Way, Washington. The unique style and form of vertical plank construction of the historic house along with the collection of historic resources present on the farm reflect the vernacular building tradition of homesteads of this type. Although there is little information known about the function of the property over the last 125-years, it has been owned and operated by several different individuals and families resulting in a dynamic history that includes many alterations and additions. The property was included in a Homestead Land Claim Patent filed by William J. Meers, which was approved on November 23, 1891 (Reference Number: WASAA 071629). Although the King County Department of Assessments dates the house as 1890, it is assumed that construction would not have begun until late-1891, at the earliest, once the land patent had been filed. Although the exact construction date cannot be confirmed, the style and form of the Meers House coincides with the methods of construction during this time period in the Pacific Northwest. William J. Meers was born on February 8, 1866 in California to Mary and William Meers. William had multiple siblings and eventually made his way to Washington State by his early twenties. On October 22, 1888, shortly before building the Meers House, he married Josephine Martin when he was 22 years old and they had their only child a year later on September 10, 1889 named Sadie Meers. It is unknown if Meers built the house himself or had it commissioned, however it is assumed that it was constructed to serve as his family house. By 1900, King County property and tax records show the original 30-acre parcel as being subdivided into two separate 10 and 20 acre tracts, although an individual by the name of "M.A. Blouvelt" pays all of the taxes for the property through 1930. M.A., or Martha, is Josephine Martin's, William's wife, sister who was married to a Charles Blouvelt. Both the Meer's and Blouvelt's live on the property through the 1930's with several census records listing Charles Meers as a "General Farmer" at the address, although the Blouvelt's pay the entire taxes based on records. According to 1934 property and tax records, the William J. Meers House was sold to H.D. Maxwell and Elizabeth Davies. There are several references to a barn fire in 1937 that completely SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY IS, 20 1 7 destroyed the barn on the property and that a new barn was built in its place. This may mean that the current barn is the 1937 barn, although this has not been confirmed. Based on the limited documentation and historic photographs available for the property, it is difficult to date all of the alterations and additions that have been made to the Meers House. Based on historic photographs, it has been confirmed that the open front porch on the south elevation was enclosed by 1959 which would have occurred during the ownership of Davies and Maxwell. The Meers House and Farm was purchased by William Larson in 1964 from Elizabeth Davies. Larson would live in the house for decades and eventually the house and farm would be deeded to his descendants listed as Margaret Justice, Anna Butler, Mary Stobie, James Phillips, and Phillip Larson. The descendants of William Larson sold the house and farm to the City of Federal Way in December 2015; the city is listed as the current owner and is managing the resource as a vacant property. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION Exterior Description (House) — (See Appendix D, See Figure 1-11) The William J. Meers House is located at 36818 8th Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington, in a predominantly rural area between Federal Way and Tacoma. The historic farmstead consists of 30-acres with a single-family residential resource constructed circa 1891 and several associated outbuildings including a mostly demolished barn and cistern, along with two separate small sheds. The original house form is a simple 1.5-story, side -gabled house situated near the top of a small hill along 8th Avenue South overlooking a shallow valley. The wood framed structure, likely consisting of vertical planks that stretch from foundation to roof supports, is supported by a post -and -block foundation that is covered on all elevations by horizontal boards. Additions appear to be resting directly on poured concrete slab foundations. The resource, which is primarily clad in vertical board -and -batten siding, includes a limited number of character -defining features of any particular architectural style in either the original house form or the large number of additions and enclosures that have been added to it. The house is approximately 2,000 square feet in size over two floors, with the overall basic dimensions of approximately 53 feet x 48 feet. The original footprint of the building is generally rectangular with several large additions and projections varying in scale and age including an enclosed front porch on the south elevation covered by a shed -style hip roof. The enclosed front porch includes large multi -pane windows on either side and a large single -pane window on the front paralleled to the front entry door. The original house form and all of the projections combine to create an overall irregular plan typical of homestead properties that have changed ownership as many times as the Meers House has over the last 125 years. In addition to the board -and -batten siding that covers the original house form and various elevations of additions, the Meers House features wide horizontal boards and wood trim that cover elevations of additions, the foundation of the original form, and the top of the each elevation along the roofline. Fenestration includes primarily two -over -two pane, double -hung wood sash windows and a number of doors including the front entry on the south elevation and two separate doors on the north of the building that are currently not accessible due to the lack of stairs. Other window types arranged around the structure, primarily on additions, include simple large single -pane and multi -pane wood frame windows. All of the windows on the original house form appear to be original to the house and match the characteristics typical for the late 19th century. Windows are simple with shallow sills and all surrounded by simple, inset narrow wood frames. SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY IS, 20 1 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM The original cross gable roof form that covers the William J. Meers House is clad in composition asphalt shingles with a large angled flat roof covered in similar shingles over the additions. The primary gable roof line includes a single, centrally located chimney covered in concrete and several contemporary roof vents on the north slope of the gable. The roof, which is currently heavily covered in biological growth, has narrow overhanging eaves that include contemporary gutters and downspouts. The small porch on the west elevation is covered by a lean-to shed -style roof and the flat roof covering the additions extends on the east elevation to create a covered porch area with a concrete floor. The building does not include a basement or accessible crawl space. Interior Description (House) — (See Appendix D, See Figure 12-33) The interior of the William J. Meers House is organized around the original rectangular two-story form of the building. The enclosed front porch on the south elevation is a rectangular space of large windows and exterior board -and -batten cladding with painted wood flooring and ceiling. The space would have originally been an open porch that had been enclosed by the late 1950s according to historic photographs. A pair of in -line single wood doors with large inset windows on the enclosed front porch serve as the front entry that open into the primary living space of the original house form. The first story of the original house consists of two separate living spaces connected by a narrow pass -through that includes a built in set of shelves and simple molding design around the arched passageway. Both living spaces feature open fire places, arranged back-to-back through the wall with a shared chimney flute, surrounded by brick and tile surrounds. The living space on the west side of the first story includes two small closets and the eastern room includes doorways to the dining room and kitchen along with the narrow wooden staircase leading to the bedrooms on the second story. The gable extension to the north, which creates the gable cross -wing form, is a large open space with several two -over -two historic wood windows that appears to have been utilized as a dining room. The space also has a wooden door that exits out onto a small covered, elevated porch that is missing stairs for access. All of the floors on the first floor interior of the original form of the Meers House are wood with a variation of historic hardwoods and original flooring covered by a more temporary hardwood example. Walls are covered in a variation of materials including plaster, various paint colors, and wallpaper patterns along with other features such as wide baseboards, picture rails and simple wood trim that wrap around windows, door and entire rooms as seen in the dining room. All of the ceilings in the original house form are plaster. The various additions include the kitchen, the only restroom, a small sunroom, and a small utility room off of the kitchen that includes a secondary entry door and exposed wood framing. The kitchen is a relatively large space that includes large built-in cabinets and a double metal sink. The kitchen floor is covered in rolled vinyl flooring and the ceiling is covered in wood boards. The south wall of the kitchen includes a random arrangement of multi -pane wood frame windows and a single horizontal single -pane window along the ceiling line. A narrow hallway off of the kitchen provides access to the one restroom that includes a contemporary ceramic sink inset into built-in cabinets, toilet, and built-in shower with tub. The small room on the northern edge of the building includes countless windows and a door that is unusable due to the lack of stairs. The room, which is mostly demolished, features exposed balloon wood framing with insulation covering the floor that has been removed from the walls and ceiling. The second story interior of the William Meers House includes three simple bedrooms all accessed via a small narrow hallway. The bedrooms on either side of the plan are relatively similar in size and each feature a single two -over -two pane double -hung wood sash window in the gable SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 201 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM ends. Each of these bedrooms feature a built-in cabinet unit constructed of wood that is custom to the spaces and follow the roofline. The bedroom on the east portion of the second story includes a small opening that provides access to the attic space over the dining room that is currently utilized as storage and is an unfinished partial height space of exposed structure. Between the two large bedrooms, along the hallway, is a small third bedroom that includes a large multi -pane fixed wood window and the profile of the chimney flute protruding from the wall covered in plaster. The floors on the second story are currently exposed wood subfloor sheets that are smooth and show signs of various materials that have been applied over the decades. The ceilings are angled to match the profile of the roofline and the condition of the plaster has deteriorated at various points to expose the underlying lath. Overall, the interior of the second story along with the rest of the Meers House interior is relatively simple with minimal character -defining features typical of homestead homes constructed during the time period. Setting & Outbuildings The William J. Meers House is located in a rural area south of the town of Federal Way in King County, Washington. The house and farm are located on a large parcel identified by the King County Department of Assessments as identification number: 322104-9112. The Meers House is located on the east side of 8th Avenue South, approximately one -quarter mile north of the intersection of South 373rd Street and 8th Avenue South. Interstate 5 runs north -south approximately one-third mile east of the historic farmstead. Downtown Federal Way is located approximately 3.5-miles to the north and is a large urban area located approximately 20-miles south of Seattle, Washington. The 2-acre parcel is surrounded by other larger parcels with scatterings of single-family residential and agriculture resources varying is age, style, and materials with no reoccurring theme. The historic Meers House is centrally located along the western border of the parcel boundary right off of 8th Avenue South. A small, unpaved cutout along 8th Avenue in front of south elevation of the house provides parking with a paved pathway that leads up to the house situated near the top of a small hill. The house is flanked by several outbuilding that are spread about the parcel including a mostly demolished cistern located directly to the east of the house, two small shed structures, and a historic barn that is described as being in ruin status. Although the property historically has been described as being an active farm, it currently is a combination of open ungroomed fields of grass, overgrown shrubs and blackberry bushes, and large groves of dense large trees including a large tree located directly in front of the historic house that may pre -date the property. Barn (See Appendix D, Figure 34-36) The barn currently located on the property is assumed to have been constructed circa 1940 and is mostly demolished with the only remaining material being the primary support posts, roofing supports and wood shingles, and vertical cladding boards primarily along the west elevation that combine to resemble that of a historic barn. A smaller balloon framed structure is adjacent to the barn which is covered in horizontal boards and capped by an angled flat roof. The barn is also heavily overgrown with blackberry vines which make it difficult to comprehend the layout and design of the structure. The historic barn is supported by a framework of large posts that extend from ground to roof, many of which are rough cut and appear to have been minimally planed after being fallen trees. The barn features a double height central volume that appears to have been flanked by a single height space on either side. Although the barn is historic in its own right, there are notations that the original barn burned in the late 1930s implying that this may be a replacement built in its place. Historic photos of a barn on the property also do not match the current barn. SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 201 7 Cistern (See Appendix D, See Figure 37-40) The cistern building is the nearest outbuilding to the Meers House and is mostly demolished due to age deterioration and neglect. It is assumed that the resource was constructed to serve as water storage for the purpose of watering crops when the property was an active farm. The original construction date is unknown, but is assumed to coincide with the original development of the farm based on the materials and style of construction. However, it is unknown for how long the cistern was utilized. The small rectangular building is clad in a combination of horizontal lap siding and wood shingles with various small windows and a single door. The structure, which is located on a slope, has a concrete storage tank that has fallen from the structure and tumbled down the hill leaving a path of wood debris between the cistern building and where the tank currently rests on its side. It is assumed that the building had a flat roof over the tank while a lean-to shed roof covers the small room that includes the windows and doors. No historic photographs or plans have been identified to further explain the design or functionality of the unique structure. The approximate dimensions of the cistern building are as follows: Width-271cm/8.89ft, Length- 169cm/5.55ft, Height-202cm/6.63ft. The approximate dimensions of the cement box used as the storage container is 130cm/4.27ft x 271 cm/8.89ft. Shed 1 (See Appendix D, See Figure 41-42) This shed structure is the larger of the two sheds on the property, commonly referred to as the shop shed, and is located to the south of the mostly demolished historic cistern structure. The construction date and original function of this shed is undetermined, although according to historic aerials of the property, it appears to be present before 1960 thus making the resource potentially eligible based upon its age. The shed is clad in standing seam aluminum siding with a door on the west elevation and a window opening on the south elevation, although the window is not installed. The shed has a lean-to shed roof, supported by simple rectangular posts, that extends the full length of the north elevation. There is a second short lean to roof enclosed on either side on the east elevation that appears to be used as dry storage for firewood or other materials. The shed is capped by an angled flat roof covered in rolled roofing material with the overall condition of the roofs being relatively poor and covered in a large amount of biological growth. The approximated dimensions of the shop shed are as follows: Width-273cm/8.96ft, Length- 800cm/26.25ft, Height-290cm/9.21ft (not including lean to roof additions). The wood storage addition on the north side of the shop shed measures approximately: Width-245cm/8.04ft, Length- 700cm/22.97ft, Height-180cm/5.91ft. The smaller addition of the east side of shop shed measures approximately: Width- 1 75cm/5.68ft, Length-273cm/8.96ft, Height-180cm/5.91ft. Shed 2 (See Appendix D, See Figure 43) This small shed, which is located between the deteriorated barn and the large shed to the north, has been referred to as the "Apple Shed" and is currently heavily overgrown by blackberry vines. The construction date and original function of this shed is undetermined, although according to historic aerials of the property, it appears to be present before 1960 thus making the resource potentially eligible based upon its age. The simple rectangular structure is clad in vertical board - and -batten with a single small door and a small window that is missing its glass. The small wood frame structure is covered by a gable roof with rusted standing seam aluminum panels. The approximate dimensions of the apple shed are as follows: Width-320cm/10.50ft, Length- 400cm/13.12ft, Height-300cm/9.84ft. SUMMIT SOLUTIONS ISPOUP, LLC MAY IS, 201 7 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Ancestory.com. "William J. Meers Family Tree." www.ancestry.com Federal Way Library, 34200 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Historical Society of Federal Way, 2645 South 312th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Landau Associates. "Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, Larson Property, Federal Way, Washington." January 20, 2015. Kirchner, R.M. "The History of Spring Valley." Federal Way Review, April 14, 1955. Accessed March 20, 2017. King County Archives (Deeds & Records), 1215 East Fir Street, Seattle, WA 98122 King. County Department of Assessments, Parcel Number: 322104-9112, httg://blue.kinqcounty.com/Assessor/eRealProperty/default.aspx "M.A. Blouvelt House/Meers Homestead." King County Historic Sites Survey Inventory Sheet. King County Office of Historic Preservation. Prepared by: Tori Laughlin, March 27, 1986. Washington State Archives, Puget Sound Regional Branch, 3000 Landerholm Circle SE, MS- N100 Bellevue, WA 98007 https://www.sos.wa.gov/archives/archives puget.aspx Williams J. Meers House Site Visits for Documentation, March 21-22, 2017, Performed by Kenny Gunn & Tyler Clouse (Summit Solutions Group), 36818 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 201 7 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS G ROUP HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 S, 201 7 t• , . •T, � A. I � � '-^ � /#��•. � � � " . K. may^. - .-�. cu �.. ,� f - �� •�.A Wit. i. 4 I+nFr. +..� "- Wyk' � •.. _� �. •- . �. i 1,r{.tr+��i L`�Y"rrCA' �"` .. � a5-•���• 1 'i�� �,_ 1 r �! 7• r �+ ;[tiJ' �Y1'tc• •, � � .Y`� N1��' Jj� '�' I ltr i ]t + V 77 �� � ']f � :L . f rh. f� •�'.-: � � . _ � Y � �.�.�, � tea. eU_ f_ � a o 4---7 Ca z N U_ Q QOl @ i1 C � M1] -a!<; .• 1. - '� �. mow ,.,�7-�ll+- —,.� + .A, '�Q;-L _ ` .�. _ �•-- act # i-_40 _ .. lilt _� �_. • o - •:,� -. cu (II U Q Q �J• __ V CO - N cz 77;7 cu oh q�O� J i y NFI ti • .1^ a• s: _ _ co Elm M�w co • C z - .fie ,�'� �~ A - i , n ii • CDE. .• Q P. Q S U M M IT SOLUTIONS GROUP HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 S, 201 7 S LU M SM� I T Property Name: PARCEL BOUNDARY William J. Meers House/ f J M.A. Blouvelt House Address: SHED 2 36818 8th Avenue S. 1 Federal Way, WA 98003 County: SHED 1 King County Parcel No: 3221049112 CISTERN (RUIN) I Drawing Title: Roof & Site Plan BARN (RUIN) Scale: 1/32" = V-0" � 1 - N k I k I Date Drawn: Ei April 2017 1 I MEERS HOUSE Drawn By. Kenny Gunn, M.S. Summit Solutions Group Y by Project Number: AQT-E17001 8T"AVENUE SOUTH Drawing No: 0F 3 S M I T LU 5Mr.R Property Name: William J. Meers House/ M.A. Blouvelt House Address: 36818 8th Avenue S. Federal Way, WA 98003 County: King County Parcel No: 3221049112 Drawing Title: Ground Floor Plan Scale: 3/16" = V-0" N 0' 33 6' 10, Date Drawn: April 2017 Drawn By: Kenny Gunn, M.S. Summit Solutions Group Promect Number: AQT E17001 Drawing No: OF S LU M SMR I T Property Name: William J. Meers House/ M.A. Blouvelt House Address: 36818 8th Avenue S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Coun : King County Parcel No: 3221049112 Drawing Title: Second Floor Plan Scale: 3/16" = V-0" UFllk Date Drawn: April 2017 Drawn Bv: Kenny Gunn, M.S. Summit Solutions Group Project Number: AQT-E 17001 Drawing No: 31OF13 SUMMIT S O L U T I O N S G R❑ U P HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 5, Z❑ 1 7 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM r� 71 L4 1% -irk CIL �-�► f 1 +w !� S y If Y a Iti ■ Barn (William J. Meer House), direction unknown, Date: 1937 ■ Washington State Archives (#322104-9112) ■ Barn (William J. Meer House), direction unknown, Date: 1959 • Washington State Archives (#322104-9112) SUMMIT SOLUTIONS O.RCL15, LLC MAY 115, 2017 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM jo dpw 27, I MA Field No. NAME Historic Common f� KING COUNTY HISTORIC SITES SURVEY INVENTORY SHEET File No.. 0566-11- Tax n 322104-9112 M.A. Blouvelt House/Meers Homestead Larson Residence LOCATION Number & Street 36818 8th Avenue South Not for Publication Site No. Incorporated Unincorporated Community Name_ Spring Valley _ $Congressional District Community Planning District Federal Way State Legislative District Zoning SE County Council District Shoreline Environment CLASSIFICATION Category District X_Building(s) Structure Historic Site Arch Site Object Ownership Public x Private Both A'ssessibility Yes, Restricted Yes, Unrestric. No Status X Occupied Unoccupied Preservation Work in Progress Threatened by: Demolition Neglect Present Use Agriculture Museum Commercial 'Park Educational Private _Entertainment Residence Government Religious Industrial Scientific _—Military _Transportation Other: OWNER OF PROPERTY 1411liam Larson Number & Street 368th Avenue South City or Town Federal Way State WA Zip 98003 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 32Sec 21Twn 04Rng (TL 112 ) UTM POR NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 - BEG NW COR SO SUBD TH N 89-06-28 E 215 FT TH S 00-38-10 E 405.21 FT TH S 89-21-01 W TO W LN SD SUBD TH N TO POB PRESENT REGISTER STATUS . _National Register _State Register _Other: . DESCRIPTION Condition: Excellent Good Fair Deteriorated Ruins _Unexposed Situation: Unaltered Altered Original Site Moved, Date PHOTO OR SITE MAP PRESENT AND ORIGINAL PHYSICAL APPEARANCE It is rather surprising that this house has survived nearly one hundred years considering its original role and quality of construction. In its original form it is an extremely simple, two-story, side -gabled house set on a hillock overlooking a shallow valley. There is little concern for style in either the original house or the series of additions and enclosures made to it. The few windows are standard (for the late 19th century) two -over -two pane, double hung sash and the siding of the house is board and batten. (continued) Y a Cn En 9 1 OQ w R. w r+ Zf m Ln DO 1 P p r >D 1n .'7 w r+ q rD "E-- :-;7- n 03 a) O LA V) "5 CS =r Q Je �• c� co co w r+ r+ 5 ❑ o a O Nc+n o co O 00 I O O �p7,O 77 N CV O G J O N J �• N V CD Q rD A) J D Z (7 (n —h —1 CF --h O- C+ =- '-A F- J D �j "S:: � c— N• 7C 00 o� O CD E3 =rr+IL<_ s � — Ln < CD =$ N C O r+ (D • ....•. �' Sa Ai '5 sD n C 7 I--• .�. l0 (D CQ CD E3 (D X C< C= 25 m In C CD S Wto (D V) J (D Cl)c+ r+ N• -50-5w r+ Cr � (D (D C+ CF C) O fD fD •� �1 Q r+ N < Vi =r (D CD !D Pi !D `L -I (D Lo (D J �• CF -s J. r-F J -a ss R J (D ors rr+ n (D w n -S (D O c❑F (a i (D 'i a) CL `C N b (D ''C �Lf CC N fA �. 'S �. ay CC I/N ��rD � �� J a) � O c+ r+ (� J' lr+ � Z c+r+ �•� (D � O O l C" p ��C (Oi J << < C1 rt -• 3 Z (DC) C1 O O 0 C) (Dn 0 -S `L Z N C"F fD =- -C) cfl no O CD -0 r+ (D C (D co - . Q. (D n O (D ❑ j = P -h n 3 fD Q) Cn o 0 (A Z O Cl) sy i CZ = O o N Q w -5 OLN o w C ?'Z-acA 07 — Cr Z v)0)=rc+ o m (D N [O O < n '� (rD C eDD J •• n c+ O rDAli CD (D -0 O • ❑ �c J a Ali-Is -s _ f+ �. ¢ J -5 �. r+ CD [a Q�-0 5w a) CL Lo N J (D O � n C7 " (D w rt w n 0 r to N C) Gi n to r+ J• 'Tj =5 - J. W r+ 7 Rr � Q CO � R•) N �. (�} O �. n �. O O (D CL O C1 OL CF 1st N R� S-0 =¢^� C � [] n (D A7 � i �0 N •�D ls7 -5 131 Cr r+'•C • C+ � a) A) J -5 M O N O ; (D �' � � V 1. N N O a< S M H O n CD n CT (D In 1 1. � �. eD CO L CD (D : r+ CLO � (D ((DD CL (D J 0'C (D �) ((DD D d UOi A) Pi [n J n Cf CL swSY ❑ IT iD J.'� = •-O ❑ � rah 4S, (D ;37 1s O 0 w ❑ r+ O (D !A ax1n O (n r+ O- 5 Q = O <� CD :9 (D A) R) �. r+ =• -0 a) A7 (D 1.-0 = rD n :3 A) E3 (D ❑ a O N Q CF ❑ to (D C+ 5: CL C¢ V, O a. MTh Ai r+ to r+ �, Ci cz aJ ..5 (D (D CD M CLr 0) (D a) r+ CD a) 07 co 11 (A c G ' 5 7 -h -, N CZ C+ ra O N(D c co ra pi CL (D N 0 Vr w rD to R-S N 0 0 r C+ C) — n a ---+ Q c+ N a. ••Y . lO c F N CD Q [A OD to Q (T(D r0 (D ❑ J. J � � �•n M --h VT D • N � O (D (A Cr (n0 o) F '-5 M::[T O `C V) 1 ❑ c0 < N :E � r+ � fa = r+ oaMr+�' -C3 0 r'F 'i (�D C N � rF a) �. (D (D R) 5 X -CD (D ' C rr -0 ' S 'S =r fi) co U a) = (D G7 (D 0 C OD N sw CA in fy Cr I. — OD LO 0 0 F- ILD v n r+ t)d enr ,y a 000 tD m o m m m. z r- a3s QJ•r a-+ r O s C C.- 4-) C r 1- CD U O C •r != 0) Q) Q) Y C as i O U 0) i c6 U i C (L) 4-) C != O•rs N r6 ro Q 3 +> > O i 0 -0 4-) +, c Q) Rs cC C N rCf s i •r C rC r Q) 4- 4- U i > N c6 Q) Q) s b •r s s s 3 O O C i • +� O s U -0 Q) rt QJ C1 i QJ - s cC 0-0-0 N a� i a -0 co c rt O 0 O Y C •r � O CO Q) Q) •r s s Q) s -0 Q) CL -C - N N r6 •0 (1) N rt O i 4- co s Q) s O O s 4-) • U O C fo a) Q) Q) i C Q) C U s i I Oi•r C +-) QJ •r U E (C >> r N }-) •r i 4- +` -0 C •r i co O i c0 Q) Y U Q) a X-0• r a N o ^ Q) Q) rp rt rt) i 0 4- a) -0 O•r N c O N ^ •0 O O i Ql -0 N QJ r r U 1 N O E Q/ O U Q) "0 Q) a O N Q) s I = c QJ Q) s F- QJ N r s r6 N 0) -0 i C r0 Y rC • O ro Q) O E U s +-) QJ U O •0 c6 () Q) N Si O -0 N s rt \ 4- ro 0 U r N U� sss i� N 0 N U 4> 4--) 4-) O c0 i i QJ ro O N 2 i r6 O a s s b () a•r i-) C Q) +� a a Q) a) N r CL a +-)-04- Q) s N a. cp = C 0-0 4-3 O N > Q O c6 s N �- Q) i Q) (A (J a O r N 4- "0 -0 co > 0) ro r COs - m L) O "0 (A N � — --� co r s Q) O C i O • N 4- r U a U < >> Q) O L) N i L s s 0 c ro 0 0 4- d, F- i Q) Q) a 4- Q O -T+ t i F,; r F- r yI ^ XL Or �; � �`r i.. - - r ,ate ,�� ♦ _ w' O rM , L7 e�j _ 70 CD P 0• P U O• P [n (n Cn tin yr N N V P � w N O .° '0 co v0 V Cr P Ln A W 3 T-4 V T T in in IM M �C I- > ; �D o' p :D 'w D +. :K N 3 'y_ j 3 'K X K 'm �3- S O 7 r C ;D rn 3 i 0 O ri G '� n D d Z Z �. ° no '� n A .'O D - d 7 - 13ji °• N ° y < C ° p O_ A N ° 0 S N Z CA < D 0 p' to p A T N m < p o_ I ° n o_ � o (n (n CA (n V, fn cn tr N N in N (n N (n to (n 40 9 w w w w w rJ ca ca w w w w w A, V `� C7 %� C1 G7 G7 GS 4�n �1 C1 L7 G1 O In �I �C < C < +f c' c •c E£ i F O A i j 7 I 7� 1 N N (n N VI Vr N N (n (n (n ( i t I 9 f 1Y.,fr N N h] N N N N L M � r CL CL 9' ° r T a ❑. N :ME C � Z w \ Z� TI co O ,T r v V a Lob A • 0. 0 V _ y D ❑ ? O 9 �" k Z. IF N e r VC ta rM N n ,w N e y o C QC v c '4 �cr i'E1 ! -r • N "nr°� 0 O I r ,{ a �►I i rrl r M a —' ci z vl eo # m °+ -_ �D O O o Ti 6 ar r r .N Ir Ir Z N» O » .» D iD �» 7 i C �• O M CL A 1v O f o 0£ W m o-n D Y SyTm D o < N 0 6 a v C Y 1 W H U. O 0 W W S H o r c c o O N N a o Ij I L + a: gl-� <N=1 "I � �' � C1 f�l f7 M ... 07 �n R•l i+l W � OJ f♦7 (� 1+7 � "P7� �E ,� � � p y j • a a IL o I. a. W ry N N N N N N N N N O 'J H o 3 0 h Z ✓f V7 N V) � c . _W N� w v� .n In G In w w w w IL < > < o N n C o u � o « N O ID o G! n O > �O n 0 c O C 3 C„ 10 d C .`O. U O O N > N = O U V O •� Z 7 O U C O Q' C p o L of t O O r o E u >«11i l9 = Zc E F N iL>Zn (j Z o0 pjJo«« U i d J UE < _c u m u_ o_ o_ E x x x c c Y ai ai a3i yyc u u 0 0 x cc o o ° o 0 0 o` 0 aEM 0 0_ c N O > >> > d Q O UJW U U a o- a H _o a J m a 0VI M M • U7 N U1 M V' wl - uy .O 1� OJ - P O N M Q �O n� h h ul �D .O `O .O .O r .O •O All fol < o COs LL Or - {J3 u u n , .�.. IL0 U O i 0 o E a� I N W ti,✓ I �vvz m En En - O e o_ fY i i�.i. r ,_• _ N LU Vl in N cn Cn Ln Cn Cn Ln R V G T o• 'P O. A W D• N O• P p .O 07 V O• cn A W N .t .O o V O• m r 3 -� v v v n n Im 'rn C r s v} < -i <- <° << s r m N a 7 o 'm 'o o '0 O 7 O 7 :x ;m 'N 3 7 •O i T a f £ ££ £ £ F E < ° 7 N jr 7 7 X X X c o n o v 3 Q !D O £ N N O O O 3 O O 3• m Q < T O N Q N 0 O ti O O O 7 Q = H X to O n :3 O 0 o Z Q n A a o Q C c n �L Z C N .ZI N n m Q = �. o Q Q m •� i V, N Z m Q . < O o 7 ie xl O c o O O p IQ 7 y O � •ill 7 £ O_ Q O .L z u m S A m O N jC = I 7 7 IQ g N I� O H e o I , a I m > •. o Z II �. r • V1 N f/, N T 1 d N- N N N f/1 N VI [/1 (/. f/. N N in !/1 cA < I N N N VI N N N f/1 N N y p [A Q s is c ,,� r N �F N O k ' r � Lm W W W W W [? C1 C3 G7 AA'' w W O W C7 W C,1 W G'1 r+1 O W C1 •W Gl ' W i 0 W G� W 0 C} O O � GI 4l G1 4� Gl G� . .� VV O j . H m m .P m �P m FP I mx m rn m f M.- •r� tiw E7. o 'o m V O• h c vl v, y' y: y y ,V, n �n .-ir n s O 7 'O Q 7 ° ° O o l O O S C _ O O O 6 i� i; y 9 m m 3 : �° or'. �� F w � v< < � o p 0 o Y+m o r,� rn a 7 0. m < _ x 4 N E C W o N 7 N N Ida AD, IL CL c i A 14 m S T O :S T CD Q n O 7 m _ N Q C O' y y O m i3 p N O D o c u - O 1 M D A H LL O 0 F W W x l G = < J � � v v v ❑ v i vT J m F - M M c n , M M r M a � co a r r is r r r r. a 1 w. r r a b N N . N NI N N N N N, N N` .t+I of N Cl N LL LL 3 J > J U p ❑ 3 Q = _ v! Z Z y = � I a ° ° q ■ b O u C V C a w = ■ v C w uo c u N v •� L ~ L G U •� C O d O Ci H o O 3 U Q O U m11 ■ o Y v b _9 ° n ° Q W y J N O 1Z +4 �C tF vl U I- O 3 C O Y O O O O O p D P G O d O ° O O O O L 74�i�ci S J J U o w us 3M 1ol r c� 0 c� cD M M M M r, M c� M c� M c� M c� m W d i o N N V) N N N99- N vl V) N N N N d J r N VJ N INi 3 Z v/ 1 h N u7 ZI u d' O _ 2 cc u:E a J U `o su E Z� O •:u •� o N ' c � O O E U v) d o b 7 o 0 0 0 a s I- a g J LL LL F- N uNi S ! of4 k- :Rr 21 • _ .. j Lit ��"`Q L. r mi CD n _ a T T a �7• la •tr 'tn cn Cn (A'cn �s to 4n m i"V �O. A W IN O 10 im V •O. (n A Pi 'O O 7 % ISM .7 O e :3 i1 T O_ o N o' o G1 0 q °i N ° T Gn -4 3 Z •o 3 A n f1 c ;� n 'o - Z c .s - � m 0 e O_ 7 = N Z e G 'y C <. W q O_ A a O O . N q N R 0 Z C < O S n ■ e O O <_ q p O A O_ e v ,C 4n ... (A r N N N N ... N N N N ... N '] O' — 4n < (n 4n U N N N N N N G^ N 4n W N i I 1 O lox w $ it 3 WWWW�WW•�wWWWw� a 0p o 0 010 0 0 p C) G] L7 p mw4.,w i A EP M. m 0 ( ( to T3: n '0 r ¢n ° r- i In T N e o T a C £ N 7 n 0 ° CL^ n- 'N £ 3 N n '; 0 m N O 7 �I , � N A io mMW s II D a (o mmlk E H LL O G Z J E � o ¢ u o In F W W b b n C $ S c c p o o I +4 l ti O C) v I � QRk s i ~fin .a-, Al a mod.` I ;.v it M M M M M M 0 M cn M 1 M ¢ M M M M M M M M Y ° 77M u N m a r r a r r a r r r r, a 11 N/ N �+ y y y y y y y y. N N N N N N N f N N N• 0 N N N N N N N N N ° e J Z U 3 3 y C• y y Z y 7 y. v) y y'n y y y y y F m C « m o o C v) 11 « tl p o o Q' U C •= S L 4' > n _ V u o C N E LL 0 O N yE O` V oo d' . p V a O ¢ LL H J O N N O 7 O « ` W O U f d J l U o O e o o u 3 'Z 3 b d o p 0 0 i 0 U in « 0 3 0 v� o c m o m o 0 o m o 0 Ln Ln v) 3 �n 7 > > > > > i C 11 1 u 0 • o > u • a y 9��Ml D c� c�c c c� M M M M u c 7 y y y y y y y y y y y y y G o O bu ad ti S Y U m U > « O •� Z N y U o u o u V 7 Z > a V L o u E o 0 a o D' o> c u m m c «« « ,c J c o x x z e b o c n x c o 0 0 o d _o lL ¢ W W U U d a` a F a g J m d D O N M � .O n u7 �'1 V) In u7 V1 y u1 •O •O — .p •O .O DNA L s C a �o � Z n r 3 n O r x x x xo M D r �o M r 3 � > Z O 00 U.1 < 1 m w 3 s a x x x x w 0 � m tj 1 Op IW O] N V V N r LLW��11 • Z O n m G] O = O O O < ° C O S N 7 O R O ° 6 ❑ o �o q °a '• q O ;p D � n s O N 7 O O IA O O Z c - _ A A C co:p q q `O A { s m 3 T Z w 0 T 3 cr iv G n p n p N ° O �. T n o T o : LW -LW K` Q �tl Gf T 7 G7 x T N D N n O T m r S n m O. r O O O o D - p Z ' ° y O V o c 1 o O_ C Q T p 03 Qo o y> > C c O 3 o G 7r e 4 0. O T O N^ A CL Cr m Z x x fm1 o n o wm w O n n C O w < o o_ a O w T O O A 7 O 7 O °y O O O � N 0 Qa� ItA r f a� a c T m q ; R ' n o c a N co O N Z N p A o s T O O. N CA R 10 \ \ O O c X X O X \ O O O O_ o N a n v o < y p � z T < o m O Gf y O M O N O 4� G) -n T N O Y G� -n -' O N o �, a s C n <_. T Q° T ' O O T T �` O 7 O �7 0 3 D n T O m '^ ❑ O 7 N' A +. o '� 10 O 7 Q7 T n 9 3 Z O O o_ q m o_ o n c JD o G 30 m D A m D << 0 c o M �y o O v Do N o < n CAo D v s vyi Z Z N y Z O_ D p r y c °m o o n ❑ V O m ,� s Q � O X N { N 00 9 A � N x A m ❑ w m W 3 r [� -3 � O Y n v c c T Li ❑ ❑ N 7 Z Z W O Z Z Z O O ri 1J oe O �• G7 IQ1 c 1p N O - N a1 n q n n m °' O rt a O Z nZ Z m O w o. s o 0 0 o T o 0 o s o T m a :T .� s u+ x 3° T o 7C Z O 2 x>> D o W N J � w N °- o W N v A O r °c �n n •� c r n. e D �1 R C r a ° m p m O '- y 3 '� s c '� �' 0 G m ° ° N o N r O Z n o n R n s° - w c n_ A n n C7 O O O = r i �c `� y Y N Z O v v v n o ` O o Z o ' m n n n m o'o ` N N D a .- O N t 7 2(A n [�j O N N 0_ O_ n 1 T N N � O S O T O m ? ° h W .� v s FFTF m m m �' a c m a � ° --I .rs R W In > _ aa a a n n n RJ N q ` N � '° F \\ I'll- N +� Pi 7 W' q O O_ d n n n �" a ° F, H, O_ O_ O_ . ...- _ _. ._ �� •s is • — tol. N N IN N N N N J N • IN N N N w N ta U U T T O x n x x x m❑ T a.- O> O O O - 'e O O a- O O O y C �. �. i� �. v ry S _� _ - D T v' O T O { q o 7 C 0 O T ❑ 7 O O — 10 ID M ❑ - ° O < O N C n p p Npr r X X X � r N G ^ O N O 7- N N N 10 C 0 o -n c O ° C C O n v m m m 3 m s s D D D T D D D o s D m D D D - T O N_ q co O O O p W \ O Z O O Z O O O p » O ? ya o ❑ _ A Z-R n U L N 1 7TT-1 > 'n K] a D 'P a z c w T❑ m � z gE n -n ❑< c c Cal q 3 7 O � 7 ° O O O n ° = �• o \ m °• n n m o O u_ m_ ,� U3 n a s O C .r. O ' O ^ o a o ;3 n- i0 0 i0 1O c N rig "Ilk ®® IN on MEN - - 1 - +. 1 n _ ,, 1w lw ow 1 Iw F J I a Z m u 2 w F- rc N I � ' I W h�l O w W F a Q a I 7 Ll]j a !! N i� a I a I O N❑ 3 z N a CI W tlJI o a 4 U Z 6 ' IIL C r1 fJ W N V MP�t O 0 F 1 a a s o_ i W z u Zvi W z° o a W I Z m N z a W a w of �( Su i•`� I11 F p O as N Of 110,. + z m a m Z 0 O O ° LL Ji ! V F F 40 a a J Z i Ja ° #j Z 1- F y O w m x N a d n< w a p° o g J� w w u u m❑} m x p PI CQ a dl to u z o....I Q.d.m D GO d O O F ul •I R i � � Z J � Ix I y m Im 7 LV I N a ki 1 z Z u p 0 a W 3 'm t� lla ~� o p m" W Q W u °a z rM Z m l a o a F. a IV m y 10 N ri A I F J I+ rl r•! y ti A � ' P• w i Z Ft! J yr .p W F ujr-�II'ri � � d r`'1I F4�C7: v L 0�I �pp.u�le�� t ap-, m NI _ w I J J t i r I ` I I 0 0 S jOD Q O f • W m> ` W a O N a JELI v a 4 ti 7 J m W Q >73 5 of 3 a O _ a O a 0 !z U) Ix W w Y �! m Ir W aIL O Z � Q W. Y � I i r m Z • — w c O � � ? W W m G N W y w (I r +-1 .Q v, N -0 O SS N < 1 to-4 m i, M Le CO��+ z "4 tu .a a M 04 k4,,* � I� T, nM �2 • M�M � � DIY ti N E�. 4 .0 Cl a°CDC �► I I O O x z ZZZZ I � J O w IL X W Q E < a -•i iad gr r31 _ 21 FO W W E Ir j-) s"I, I-1-I � � � � cd ¢ 7 > \ 2 ; ; c m ( ! § J ; 2 § 3 / A k d 2 - R ƒ a k q m 0 m K§ 2 2 e @ g P. ` E wtd � � 7 m m k� � /0 � \ o � z §� �\ \ 7 od 9 « ) 2 § j ƒ -< k ) C ° § its g e CD I .> \ m - m § 2 ƒ . m f • _ ¢ \� I In! kCe k . •� o - ' e is f 0 , � -nM @ j C ■ ' E r 2 ` . � ( . E 0 32 / w } § k 0 c» 0 w c R k § § . 0 2 r & > r m a) c ƒ f |( 2 ; x x x x; ; L [ o [ / § 2 2 �E - a ¥ CA % S § ƒ � z § § 2 � ■ ■ ■ m / .» \ § / Ob a ■ . m » , m ; m (3 . 0 2 § U § , § M 0 U r B o �- Z a a a ix 0 0 uL. 111111111111� g loll it 13 I >.''", �i z M prO' r" x m m fl Q US 3 A m 0 Z �1 NN Z F�+ X m FD O Z U] A 0 Io O G m 0 Ca C] ca C p C+w 70 ct • �' * CD 9 Fl C+ F fA -2to A 0 Fs 9ij �O 0 (D a m cm0 n wn -m m m c r 0 E 0 z Cu ti m r m p F O m "• Z < c z O c A jO O F' _ D+1 1 U) • ■ m (S z 0 G1 m z yi to 0 c A m m � �;. a C • fi .d r rn C O �•, -- Z m m - m m O Z Q ° 0 O m m D m o A W r O m � m c D m �+ < r vo A x x x x x N m ►d c n 0 F-' , °z m m 0 N a N n m o co N m 0 m p• m ►d En z rn o d VI iR &F SR C r O 4 N ro�PO � • n O z T c n z D N m M O m O 1° a z z X D z m 116 cTi C+ a n O r m O (D Z O t+ CY � C+ OD Q 4 v m O r 0 A .-'1 Gll O r4 r4 O T4 Id eId l Ali Dili Ix . 1.1 I Ram Al SUMMIT SO L U T I ON S G R O UP HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 2017 Figure 1 William J. Meers House & Farm (Exterior) View Description: South Elevation & Front - Yard from 8th Avenue South Direction Facing: Y Northeast Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 22, 2017 Figure 2 William J. Meers, House (Exterior) Description: Front (South) Elevation Direction Facing: North Taken By: Kenny Gunn r w Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS 13POUF-, LLC MAY 1 S, 20 1 7 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM Figure• • View Description: i West Elevation , - i f x Direction Facing: East Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 Figure Description: North Elevation Direction Facing: - Southeast ` Taken By: Gunn Kenny __ t Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 5, 201 7 Figure 5 William J. Meers House (Exterior) View Description: North Elevation Detail Direction Facing: Southeast Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: ---- - -_ �t__�,� - March 21, 2017 -- • -`� -e- Figure 6 William J. Meers. House (Exterior) Description: East Elevation (Additions) - r 'r Direction Facing: West Taken By: oil Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 S, 201 7 Figure -House View Description: Northeast corner detail, covered porch r r r' �• Direction Facing: Southwest Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 Figure 8 William J. Meers House (Exterior) Description: Southeast corner detail Direction Facing: North r Taken By: l Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 5, 201 7 Figure • William J. Meers House• View Description: ' Front (South) Elevation Detail f: ' '• Direction Facing: North F r�•-. Taken By: • Kenny Gunn Date Taken: ' March 21, 2017 r Figure 10 William J. Meers House (Exterior) Description: _ �- _ I Southwest corner detail Direction Facing: •; Northeast ,� ' Taken By:x Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 5, 20 1 7 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM View Description: Two -over -two Window Detail (East Elevation) Direction Facing: I West Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 N SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY IS, 20 1 7 HouseFigure 12 William J. Meers •r — GroundFloor) View Description: Front Entry Enclosed Porch Direction Facing: Northeast Taken By: Kenny Gunn " Date Taken: March 21, 2017 HouseFigure 13 William J. Meers -Floor) Description: Living Space 1 Direction Facing: Northwest Taken By: Kenny Gunn f` , k Date Taken: �+ March 21, 2017 - J SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 201 7 �HIST❑RIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM Figure•(interior• • • • View Description: Living Space 1 Direction Facing: Northeast Taken By: z� f Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 HouseFigure 15 William J. Meers Floor) Description: Living Space 1, Front Entry Detail Direction Facing: South Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 201 HISTORIC RESEARCH & OOCUMENTATi-b-IV WILLIAM S. MEERS HOUSE & FARM Figure 16 1 Figure 17 1 William J. Meers House (Interior — Ground Floor) L y 4 � Awl - William J. Meers House (Interior — Ground Floor) 16. 14 .e kr •- HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM Figure 18 William J. Meers House (interior — Ground Floor) View Description: Dining Room Direction Facing: Northwest Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 Figure • -Floor) Description: Living Space 1, Interior Window Detail Direction Facing: : r East Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLO MAY 1 S, 201 7 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILUAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM Figure1 William J. Meers House(interior• • • • View Description: Kitchen Direction Facing: Northwest = Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 (interiorFigure 21 William J. Meers House Floor) Description: Kitchen Window Detail i Direction Facing: South A, Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 -►ems. SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 201 7 Floor)Figure 22 William J. Meers House (interior - Ground View Description: Utility Room adjacent to Kitchen Direction Facing: North Taken By: Kenny Gunn +' Date Taken: March 21, 2017 Floor)Figure 23 William J. Meers House (interior - Ground Description: Restroom Direction Facing: East it Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY IS, 2❑ 1 7 View Description: Living Space 3 (Sunroom) Direction Facing: Northeast Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 Description: Hallway from Kitchen Direction Facing: North Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS Gi20JP, LLS MAY IS, 20 1 7 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM Figure 26 William J. Meers House• • • • • View Description: Stair Detail Direction Facing: West Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 (InteriorFigure 27 William J. Meers House - .. Description: Second Floor Hallway Direction Facing: - - East ' Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 S, 201 View Description: Bedroom 1 Direction Facing: I I West I Taken By: I Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 Description: Bedroom 1 I Direction Facing: I Southeast I Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 201 7 Figure1 William J. Meers House• • •Floor) View Description: Attic (Crawl Space) Direction Facing: North Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 Floor)Figure 31 William J. Meers House (interior — Second Description: Bedroom 3 Direction Facing: i�•4 Northwest ' Taken By: _ Kenny Gunn .� Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY IS, 20 1 7 Figure 32 View Description: William J. Meers House. r' •Floor) y Bedroom 2 Direction Facing: West Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 33 Description: William J. Meers HouseFigure SecondFloor) Bedroom 2 Window Detail Direction Facing: South Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GPOUP, LLC MAY IS, Z❑ 1 7 Figure 34 Barn — Meers Farmstead (Exterior) View Description: East Elevation (Ruin) Direction Facing:. West Taken By: F Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 Figure 35 Barn — Meers Farmstead (Exterior) Description: North & West Elevation (Ruin) Direction Facing: Southeast Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 15, 20 1 7 HISTORIC RESEARCH « DOCUMENTATION w azawJ. MEEPSHOUSE &FARM Figure 3§ Figure 37 Barn — Meer Farmstead (ExteHor - . `�:.=\�2k •�� � ��■ � ��\�y�»` Cistern — Meer Farmstead (Exterior) XX HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM Figure 38 Cistern - Meers Farmstead (Exterior) View Description: is SoutheastCorner _• C• 'ESL - r� {�.■ � .� j lirection Facing: y { • m Figure 39 Cistern - Meers Farmstead (Exterior) Description: West E16vati;tln •Facing: •fir . Rk1 . ,.� ,y.#-� '', - f- SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 S, 201 7 Figure -0 Cistern Meers Farmstead View Description: North Elevation t FI Direction Facing: Southeast — - - Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 _ r Figure 41 -. .. Description: West & South Elevation Direction Facing: Northeast 11 Taken By: Kenny Gunn Date Taken: March 21, 2017 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC MAY 1 5, 201 7 HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM Figure 42 Shed 1 — Meers Farmstead (Exterior) Figure 43 1 p .Ar. . .._.: J.:ryrY/ p . Shed 2 — Meers Farmstead (Exterior) XXI SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP HISTORIC RESEARCH & DOCUMENTATION WILLIAM J. MEERS HOUSE & FARM SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLD MAY IS, 20 17 SUMMIT SO L U T I ON S G R O UP Responsibilities Serves as the primary Historic Preservation Specialist for completing a variety of historic preservation services. Responsible for conducting built-environment/cultural resources investigations to assist in the preparation of review documents for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Other services and responsibilities include National Register of Historic Places Nominations, Historic Resource Survey & Inventory Projects, Historic Context statements, Section 106 Mitigation Projects, and much more. Manages consultation and compliance of documents/reports with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in appropriate state. Experience completing historic preservation contracts and services in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Alaska. Executive Summary Gunn has worked as a Historic Preservation Specialist for various private and public organizations, and was an active private historic preservation consultant in the Pacific Northwest for several years. Completed projects and core competencies include National Register of Historic Places nominations, Reconnaissance & Intensive level surveys, Section 106 Review & Compliance, HABS Documentation, Architectural Descriptions & Historical Context statements, Film & Digital Architectural Photography, Historic Architectural Design consultations, historic tax credit applications, and much more. Gunn holds degrees in architectural studies, historic preservation, and business management. Gunn is a certified Lead -Based Paint and Asbestos Inspector in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Alaska. He also meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards for Architectural History & Historic Preservation. SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC 6600 NE 7ST" COURT, SUITE B3 I PORTLAND, OR 1 9721 B 1 503.379.4009 704 W. H000 AVENUE, SUITE C I SISTERS, OR 1 97759 1 541.549.662❑ WWW.SUMMITSDLUTI13NS13ROUR.COM SUM S O L U T 1 ❑ N S Independent School c.1919 Benton County, Oregon Summary MIT G R ❑ U P Summit Solutions Group offers a wide variety of Historic Preservation services to clients located in the Pacific Northwest. Primary services include conducting built- environment/cultural resources investigations to assist in the preparation of review documents for compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Other services include National Register of Historic Places Nominations, Architectural Survey & Inventory projects, Historic Context statements, Section 106 Mitigation projects, and much more. Summit manages consultation and compliance of documents/ reports with State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in appropriate state. Summit is proud to offer all Historic Preservation services in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Alaska. SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP, LLC 6600 NE 7BT" COURT, SUITE 63 I PORTLAND, OR I 9721 B I 503.379.4009 704 W. HOOD AVENUE, SUITE C I SISTERS, OR I 97759 I 541.549.6620 WWW.SUMMITSOL-UTIONSCSROUP.COM QUESTIONS & QUOTES SUMMIT SOLUTIONS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DIVISION 6600 NE 78'" COURT, SUITE 83 PORTLAND, 0R 97218 503.379.4009 PHONE ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DIVISION SUMMARY & SERVICES WWW.SUMMITSOLUTIONSGROUP.COM v f /•y '.k Sri - Services . +fry•r. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) ,r L- r•,�g. 4"Environmental Site Pre -Screening" t5r ` Biological Assessments & Monitoring ti r} a f., �� �',-'.! 40- •� Regulatory & Environmental Consulting 46. f ,•','";, - Online Tracking & Real Time Project Status Wetland Services Section 106/SHPO Review & Compliance _ ,■� , = Historic Preservation & Archaeology Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Geotechnical Engineering Assessments Lead & Asbestos Sampling and Testing Soil Remediation Soil Resistivity Testing Structural Assessment/Analysis Historic Preservation Consulting ODOT CECI Inspections 1A & Boundary Surveys Federal, State & Local Agency Consulting Appendix B: Historic Property Inventory Forms Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 27 Location Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House 14 if- Property ID: 327005 Address: 36818 8th Ave S, Federal Way, Washington, USA Location Comments: 47.271199,-122.324062 Tax No/Parcel No: 3221049112 Plat/Block/Lot: POR NW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 DAF - BEGNW COR SD SUBD TH N Geographic Areas: King Certified Local Government, King County, T21R04E32, POVERTY BAY Quadrangle Information Number of stories: N/A Construction Dates: Construction Type Year Circa Built Date 1891 P Historic Use: Category Subcategory Domestic Domestic - Single Family House Domestic Domestic - Single Family House Historic Context: Category Architecture Agriculture Architect/Engineer: Category Name or Company Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 1 of 16 Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Thematics: Local Registers and Districts Name Date Listed Notes Project History Project Number, Organization, Resource Inventory SHPO Determination Project Name 2011-07-00109, , Assessors Data 7/11/2011 Project: King County D 2016-07-04887, , Demolition of 3/22/2017 Meers Homestead Determined Eligible Property ID: 327005 SHPO Determined By, Determined Date Michael Houser, 7/11/2016 Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 2 of 16 Historic Property Report mWe Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 CUT Of ?.iDI I IISTO RIC ('RS 4.�:•. N Photos Meers House —facing northeast.JPG Meers House west elevation.JPG Meers House south elevation.]PG Meers House window detail.JPG Meers House southwest perspective.JPG Meers House north elevation detail.JPG Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 3 of 16 �t hI Historic Property Report ►� Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 [Y37Uf PdCHnECLUG+ HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meers House facing southeast.JPG Meers House —detail, facing north.JPG , .. r a Meers House utility room facing north.JPG Meers House east elevation.JPG Meers House_ facing north.JPG Meers House stairs detail.JPG Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 4 of 16 tack Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 DST Of ARO i n HISTORIC PR:5iu H Meers House_restroom.JPG Meers House living space 2—facing NE.JPG Meers House living space 1—fire detail.JPG Meers House living space 3—facing NE.JPG Meers House living space 1_window.JPG Meers House —living space 1—facing south.JPG Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 5 of 16 Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House d -3tLa'-;� [I] Meers House living space 1facing NW.JPG Meers House kitchen window detail.JPG Meers House —interior —front entry porch.JPG Property ID: 327005 Meers House living space 1—facing NE.JPG Meers House_kitchen_facing NW.JPG Meers House_hallway_facing north.JPG Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 6 of 16 d Historic Property Report q4� Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 II�Iiip�RK' F ESEav4ifCk Meers House dining room_facing north.JPG Meers House bedroom 2_facing north.JPG Meers House —bedroom 1—facing east.JPG Meers House —bedroom 3—facing west.JPG - 'Aar Meers House —bedroom 1—facing west.JPG Meers House_attic_facing north.JPG Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 7 of 16 d Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 Tj CST OF + HISTORIC PRESERVATION Meers House_2nd story hallway.JPG 322104-9112, house, 1937.jpg southeast perspective.JPG 322104-9112, house, 1959.jpg west elevation.JPG south elevation.JPG Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 8 of 16 d-hp vyrol+]a1EG I115TGRIC PRESERVATION Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House northwest perspective.JPG PDF i William J. Meers House Second Floor Plan.pdf from right of way.JPG Property ID: 327005 William J. Meers House Ground Floor Plan.pdf Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 9 of 16 Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Inventory Details - 7/11/2011 Common name: Date recorded: Field Recorder: Field Site number: SHPO Determination Detail Information Surveyor Opinion 7/11/2011 Artifacts Consulting, Inc. 3221049112 Property ID: 327005 Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 10 of 16 d,c.)hp Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 oa•r or �aa UL,_XQG, HISTORIC Pk ESERVgTIGN Significance narrative: Data included on this historic property inventory form (HPI) detail stemmed from County Assessor building records imported by the Washington State Department of Archaeology of Historic Preservation (DAHP) into WISAARD in 2011. This upload reduces data entry burden on community volunteers and historical societies participating in the survey and inventory of their communities. The intent of this project is directed specifically to facilitating community and public involvement in stewardship, increasing data accuracy, and providing a versatile planning tool to Certified Local Governments (CLGs). Project methodology entailed use of the University of Washington's State Parcel Database (http://depts.washington.edu/wagis/projects/parcels/development.php) to provide the base parcel layer for CLGs. Filtering of building data collected from each county trimmed out all properties built after 1969, as well as all current, previously inventoried properties. Translation of building data descriptors to match fields in HPI allowed the data upload. Calculation of point locations utilized the center of each parcel. Data on this detail provides a snapshot of building information as of 2011. A detailed project methodology description resides with DAHP. Project team members: Historic Preservation Northwest, GeoEngineers, and Artifacts Consulting, Inc. (project lead). King County property records date the consrtruction of this house as 1890. Assuming this is accurate, the construction would coincide with the homestead claim filed by William J. Meers. Originally the 80 acre homestead (running approximately 20 acres south and 40 acres east from the homesite) was claimed by Henry Whitmane in 1883. In February 1887, William Meers filed a complaint contesting Whitmane's claim and in July 1887 Whitmane relinquished the claim, never having gained patent to the land. The basis for the contest may have been that Whitmane had not made the required improvements as per the 1862 Homestead Act, but that is purely speculation. In any case, William Meers secured a claim on the land in March 1890, paying $2.50 per acre and receiving patent to the land in November 1891. The next available record of ownership is in 1907 when a property atlas shows the Meers homestead split up into 10 and 20 acre tracts. M. Blauvelt is noted as the owner of the home site at this time and remained so in 1926 when another atlas documents the ownership: Blauvelt does not show up in the King County Polk Directory of 1911-12 (however, neither do his Spring Valley neighbors) so it can only be guessed that he did some light dairy farming. The land and the market were particularly good for dairy farmers in this area in the early century and the barn on the site (listed as having been built in 1900) appears to have been a large livestock barn. The King County property record card lists Elizabeth Davies as owner of the property from 1934. The present owner, William Larson, acquired the property in 1964. Physical description: The house at 36818 8th Avenue S, Federal Way, is located in King County. According to the county assessor, the structure was built in 1900 and is a single family dwelling. The building has a single-family form. Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 11 of 16 dcihp, Historic Property Report ALOVN� Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 nPT Or ARCIIA[I,EUG` I HISTORIC f RESERSAMN Inventory Details - 3/22/2017 Common name: William J. Meers House Date recorded: 3/22/2017 Field Recorder: Kenny Gunn Field Site number: SHPO Determination Detail Information Characteristics: Category Item Foundation Post & Pier Form Type Single Dwelling - Side Gable Roof Type Gable - Side Roof Material Asphalt/Composition - Shingle Cladding Wood - Board & Batten Structural System Wood - Vertical Plank Plan Irregular Surveyor Opinion Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places: Yes Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local): No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local): No Significance narrative: Built circa 1891, the William J. Meers House and Farm is locally significant and potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A in the area of Agriculture as one of few remaining settlement -era homestead properties located in the rural area surrounding Federal Way, Washington. The property exhibits cultural landscape integrity, in its overall spatial organization as a farm, response to natural features, circulation and arrangement of building and other structural remains, and materials. Although the historic house has been heavily altered by additions, the overall homestead retains a high -degree of integrity and is one of few known surviving vertical plank constructed resources in the area. The homestead retains integrity of location, setting, design, materials, workmanship (however it should be noted that many of the outbuildings are in a deteriorated condition or ruin status), feeling, and association. The period of significance for the William J. Meers House and Farm, also known as the Charles and Martha Blouvelt House, has been identified as starting in 1891 when the original Homestead Claim was made by Meers and extends through 1934 when the property ownership from Charles and Martha Blouvelt House, relatives of Meers, was transferred to Elizabeth Davies. The William J. Meers House & Farm is significant as one of the few surviving historic homesteads present in the rural area of Federal Way, Washington. The unique style and Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 12 of 16 C Historic Property Report ;) Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 o-rroT "ROV- -C•loc, . 1115TORIC f RESERVATICN form of vertical plank construction of the historic house along with the collection of historic resources present on the farm reflect the vernacular building tradition of homesteads of this type. Although there is little information known about the function of the property over the last 125-years, it has been owned and operated by several different individuals and families resulting in a dynamic history that includes many alterations and additions. The property was included in a Homestead Land Claim Patent filed by William J. Meers, which was approved on November 23, 1891(Reference Number: WASAA 071629). Although the King County Department of Assessments dates the house as 1890, it is assumed that construction would not have begun until late-1891, at the earliest, once the land patent had been filed. Although the exact construction date cannot be confirmed, the style and form of the Meers House coincides with the methods of construction during this time period in the Pacific Northwest. William J. Meers was born on February 8, 1866 in California to Mary and William Meers. William had multiple siblings and eventually made his was to Washington State by his early twenties. On October 22, 1888, shortly before building the Meers House, he married Josephine Martin when he was 22 years old and they had their only child a year later on September 10, 1889 named Sadie Meers. It is unknown if Meers built the house himself or had it commissioned, however it is assumed that is was constructed to serve as his family house. By 1900, King County property and tax records show the original 30- acre parcel as being subdivided into two separate 10 and 20 acre tracts, although an individual by the name of "M.A. Blouvelt" pays all of the taxes for the property through 1930. M.A., or Martha, is Josephine Martin's, William's wife, sister who was married to a Charles Blouvelt. Both the Meer's and Blouvelt's live on the property through the 1930's with several census records listing Charles Meers as a "General Farmer" at the address, although the Blouvelt's pay the entire taxes based on records. According to 1934 property and tax records, the William J. Meers House was sold to H.D. Maxwell and Elizabeth Davies. There are several references to a barn fire in 1937 that completely destroyed the barn on the property and that a new barn was built in its place. This may mean that the current barn is the 1937 barn, although this has not been confirmed. Based on the limited documentation and historic photographs available for the property, it is difficult to date all of the alterations and additions that have been made to the Meers House. Based on historic photographs, it has been confirmed that the open front porch on the south elevation was enclosed by 1959 which would have occurred during the ownership of Davies and Maxwell. The Meers House and Farm was purchased by William Larson in 1964 from Elizabeth Davies. Larson would live in the house for decades and eventually the house and farm would be deeded to his descendants listed as Margaret Justice, Anna Butler, Mary Stobie, James Phillips, and Phillip Larson. The descendants of William Larson sold the house and farm to the City of Federal Way in December 2015; the city is listed as the current owner and is managing the resource as a vacant property. Physical description: Exterior Description The William J. Meers House is located at 36818 8th Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington, in a predominantly rural area between Federal Way and Tacoma. The historic farmstead consists of 30-acres with a single-family residential resource constructed circa 1891 and several associated outbuildings including a mostly demolished barn and cistern, along with two separate small sheds. The original house form is a simple 1.5-story, side -gabled house situated near the top of a small hill along 8th Avenue South overlooking a shallow valley. The wood framed structure, likely consisting of vertical planks that stretch from foundation to roof supports, is supported Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 13 of 16 k� 3 Historic Property f l�� p Y Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 D3T Or?RCIVECLOC. 1115TORIC PRESEF'.VATIGN by a post -and block foundation that is covered on all elevations by horizontal boards. Additions appear to be resting directly on poured concrete slab foundations. The resource, which is primarily clad in vertical board -and -batten siding, includes a limited number of character -defining features of any particular architectural style in either the original house form or the large number of additions and enclosures that have been added to it. The house is approximately 2,000 square feet in size over two floors, with the overall basic dimensions of approximately 53 feet x 48 feet. The original footprint of the building in generally rectangular with several large additions and projections varying in scale and age including an enclosed front porch on the south elevation covered by a shed -style hip roof. The enclosed front porch includes large multi -pane windows on either side and a large single -pane window on the front paralleled to the front entry door. The original house form and all of the projections combine to create an overall irregular plan typical of homestead properties that have changed ownership as many times as the Meers House has over the last 125 years. In addition to the board -and -batten siding that covers the original house form and various elevations of additions, the Meers House features wide horizontal boards and wood trim that cover elevations of additions, the foundation of the original form, and the top of the each elevation along the roofline. Fenestration includes primarily two -over - two pane, double -hung wood sash windows and a number of doors including the front entry on the south elevation and two separate doors on the north of the building that are currently not accessible due to the lack of stairs. Other window types arranged around the structure, primarily on additions, include simple large single -pane and multi - pane wood frame windows. All of the windows on the original house form appear to be original to the house and match the characteristics typical for the late 19th century. Windows are simple with shallow sills and all surrounded by simple, inset narrow wood frames. The original cross gable roof form that covers the William J. Meers House is clad in composition asphalt shingles with a large angled flat roof covered in similar shingles over the additions. The primary gable roof line includes a single, centrally located chimney covered in concrete and several contemporary roof vents on the north slope of the gable. The roof, which is currently heavily covered in biological growth, has narrow overhanging eaves that include contemporary gutters and downspouts. The small porch on the west elevation is covered by a lean-to shed -style roof and the flat roof covering the additions extends on the east elevation to create a covered porch area with a concrete floor. The building does not include a basement or accessible crawl space. Interior Description The interior of the William J. Meers House is organized around the original rectangular two-story form of the building. The enclosed front porch on the south elevation is a rectangular space of large windows and exterior board -and -batten cladding with painted wood flooring and ceiling. The space would have originally been an open porch that had been enclosed by the late 1950s according to historic photographs. A pair of in -line single wood doors with large inset windows on the enclosed front porch serve as the front entry that open into the primary living space of the original house form. The first story of the original house consists of two separate living spaces connected by a narrow pass - through that includes a built in set of shelves and simple molding design around the arched passageway. Both living spaces feature open fire places, arranged back-to-back through the wall with a shared chimney flute, surrounded by brick and tile surrounds. Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 14 of 16 CJqhP Historic Property Report AL016 Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 06YOf PFESERVAT1 4 I IiSICRIC f ESERV FTICN The living space on the west side of the first story includes two small closets and the eastern room includes doorways to the dining room and kitchen along with the narrow wooden staircase leading to the bedrooms on the second story. The gable extension to the north, which creates the gable cross -wing form, is a large open space with several two -over -two historic wood windows that appears to have been utilized as a dining room. The space also has a wooden door that exits out onto a small covered, elevated porch that is missing stairs for access. All of the floors on the first floor interior of the original form of the Meers House are wood with a variation of historic hardwoods and original flooring covered by a more temporary hardwood example. Walls are covered in a variation of materials including plaster, various paint colors, and wallpaper patterns along with other features such as wide baseboards, picture rails and simple wood trim that wrap around windows, door and entire rooms as seen in the dining room. All of the ceilings in the original house form are plaster. The various additions include the kitchen, the only restroom, a small sunroom, and a small utility room off of the kitchen that includes a secondary entry door and exposed wood framing. The kitchen is a relatively large space that includes large built-in cabinets and a double metal sink. The kitchen floor is covered in rolled vinyl flooring and the ceiling is covered in wood boards. The south wall of the kitchen includes a random arrangement of multi -pane wood frame windows and a single horizontal single -pane window along the ceiling line. A narrow hallway off of the kitchen provides access to the one restroom that includes a contemporary ceramic sink inset into built-in cabinets, toilet, and built-in shower with tub. The small room on the northern edge of the building includes countless windows and a door that is unusable due to the lack of stairs. The room, which is mostly demolished, features exposed balloon wood framing with insulation covering the floor that has been removed from the walls and ceiling. The second story interior of the William Meers House includes three simple bedrooms all accessed via a small narrow hallway. The bedrooms on either side of the plan are relatively similar in size and each feature a single two -over -two pane double -hung wood sash window in the gable ends. Each of these bedrooms feature a built-in cabinet unit constructed of wood that is custom to the spaces and follow the roofline. The bedroom on the east portion of the second story includes a small opening that provides access to the attic space over the dining room that is currently utilized as a storage and is an unfinished partial height space of exposed structure. Between the two large bedrooms, along the hallway, is a small third bedroom that includes a large multi -pane fixed wood window and the profile of the chimney flute protruding from the wall covered in plaster. The floors on the second story are currently exposed wood subfloor sheets that are smooth and show signs of various materials that have been applied over the decades. The ceilings are angled to match the profile of the roofline and the condition of the plaster has deteriorated at various points to expose the underlying lath. Overall, the interior of the second story along with the rest of the Meers House interior is relatively simple with minimal character -defining features typical of homestead homes constructed during the time period. Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 15 of 16 dc-'bp Historic Property Report ,L'° Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - House Property ID: 327005 DTT Or?-RCI6Kaoc` + HISTORIC PRESERVATION Bibliography: Ancestory.com. "William J. Meers Family Tree." www.ancestry.com Federal Way Library, 34200 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Historical Society of Federal Way, 2645 South 312th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Landau Associates. "Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, Larson Property, Federal Way, Washington." January 20, 2015. Kirchner, R.M. "The History of Spring Valley." Federal Way Review, April 14, 1955. Accessed March 20, 2017. King County Archives (Deeds & Records), 1215 East Fir Street, Seattle, WA 98122 King County Department of Assessments, Parcel Number: 322104-9112, http://blue.kingcounty.com/Assessor/eReaIProperty/default.aspx "M.A. Blouvelt House/Meers Homestead." King County Historic Sites Survey Inventory Sheet. King County Office of Historic Preservation. Prepared by: Tori Laughlin, March 27, 1986. Washington State Archives, Puget Sound Regional Branch, 3000 Landerholm Circle SE, MS-N100 Bellevue, WA 98007 https://www.sos.wa.gov/archives/archives_puget.aspx Williams J. Meers House Site Visits for Documentation, March 21-22, 2017, Performed by Kenny Gunn & Tyler Clouse (Summit Solutions Group), 36818 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 16 of 16 Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Cistern L1•f ul 44CIIn[G�G+ IIISTORIC'F.ESER��TICiJ Location Address: Geographic Areas: Information Number of stories: Construction Dates: Construction Type Built Date Historic Use: Category Vacant/Not in Use Historic Context: Category Agriculture Architect/Engineer: Category E7 Property ID: 710089 36818 8th Ave S, Federal Way, Washington, USA King Certified Local Government, King County, T211304E32, POVERTY BAY Quadrangle N/A Year Circa 1900 rv— Subcategory Vacant/Not in Use Name or Company Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 1 of 5 Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Cistern Property ID: 710089 Thematics: Local Registers and Districts Name Date Listed Notes Project History Project Number, Organization, Resource Inventory SHPO Determination SHPO Determined By, Project Name Determined Date 2016-07-04887, , Demolition of 3/22/2017 Meers Homestead Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 2 of 5 d.= [jP Historic Property Report A" Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Cistern Property ID: 710089 DTI W hFCI LnLc'oG7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION Photos Cistern facing northwest.JPG Cistern facing southeast.JPG Cistern facing east.JPG 322104-9112, tank house, 1937.jpg Cistern facing north.JPG Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 3 of 5 cl{.--hp Historic Property Report a Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Cistern C64OF ARx IinfCt,:C-Y, HISTORIC Pk[SER%'tTION Inventory Details - 3/22/2017 Common name: William J. Meers Homestead Cistern Date recorded: 3/22/2017 Field Recorder: Kenny Gunn Field Site number: SHPO Determination Detail Information Characteristics: Category Item Form Type Vessel Roof Type Flat with Eaves Roof Material Wood - Shingle Cladding Wood - Shingle Structural System Wood - Balloon Frame Plan Rectangle Property ID: 710089 Surveyor Opinion Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places: Yes Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local): No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local): No Significance narrative: The Cistern located on the William J. Meers Homestead is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based upon its style and association with the homestead as a whole. The cistern structure is heavily deteriorated and nearing demolished status due to neglect. Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 4 of 5 dChHistoric Property Report � �f ' Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Cistern Property ID: 710089 DSTOI 1.90inD�WC'+ HISTORIC PRESERVATION Physical description: The cistern building is the nearest outbuilding to the Meers House and is mostly demolished due to age deterioration and neglect. It is assumed that the resource was constructed to serve as water storage for the purpose of watering crops when the property was an active farm. The original construction date is unknown, but is assumed to coincide with the original development of the farm based on the materials and style of construction. However, it is unknown for how long the cistern was utilized. The small rectangular building is clad in a combination of horizontal lap siding and wood shingles with various small windows and a single door. The structure, which is located on a slope, has a concrete storage tank that has fallen from the structure and tumbled down the hill leaving a path of wood debris between the cistern building and where the tank currently rests on its side. It is assumed that the building had a flat roof over the tank while a lean- to shed roof covers the small room that includes the windows and doors. No historic photographs or plans have been identified to further explain the design or functionality of the unique structure. The approximate dimensions of the cistern building are as follows: Width-271cm/8.89ft, Length-169cm/5.55ft, Height-202cm/6.63ft. The approximate dimensions of the cement box used as the storage container is 130cm/4.27ft x 271cm/8.89ft. Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 5 of 5 (D . Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Shop D3•f UT:,grIInECLUG'. Shed (Shed 1) HISTORIC PFESERS'aTION Location Property ID: 710090 Address: 36818 8th Ave S, Federal Way, Washington, USA Geographic Areas: King Certified Local Government, King County, T21R04E32, POVERTY BAY Quadrangle Information Number of stories: N/A Construction Dates: Construction Type Year Circa Built Date 1940 7 Historic Use: Category Subcategory Agriculture/Subsistence Agriculture/Subsistence - Storage Historic Context: Category Agriculture Architect/Engineer: Category Name or Company Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 1 of 5 dchpHistoric Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Shop Property ID: 710090 Shed (Shed 1) Thematics: Local Registers and Districts Name Date Listed Notes Project History Project Number, Organization, Resource Inventory SHPO Determination SHPO Determined By, Project Name Determined Date 2016-07-04887„ Demolition of 3/22/2017 Meers Homestead Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 2 of 5 d HHIISTORIC RESERVA7jDN Photos Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Shop Property ID Shed (Shed 1) Shed 1—facing east.JPG Shed 1—facing south.JPG Shed 1—facing west.JPG Shed 1—facing northeast.JPG 710090 Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 3 of 5 dahp Historic Property Report SWIM Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Shop uvTOF •ac„ 1CLJG„ Shed (Shed 1) HISTORIC PRESERS'-TIOH Inventory Details - 3/22/2017 Common name: William J. Meers Homestead Shop Shed (Shed 1) Date recorded: 3/22/2017 Field Recorder: Kenny Gunn Field Site number: SHPO Determination Detail Information Characteristics: Category Item Form Type Utilitarian Roof Type Flat with Eaves Roof Material Asphalt/Composition - Rolled Cladding Metal - Corrugated Structural System Wood - Balloon Frame Plan Rectangle Properly ID: 710090 Surveyor Opinion Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places: Yes Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local): No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local): No Significance narrative: The Shop Shed, referred to as Shed 1, located on the William J. Meers Homestead is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based upon its age and association with the homestead as a whole. The shed structure is in poor condition and is overgrown with vegetation. Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 4 of 5 C] -,,hp Historic Property Report A&o-�,Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Shop Property ID: 710090 D6•Torc_RC'IVB nCG Shed (Shed 1) ❑iSTORIC Pk ESERV�TION Physical description: This shed structure is the larger of the two sheds on the property, commonly referred to as the shop shed, and is located to the south of the mostly demolished historic cistern structure. The construction date and original function of this shed is undetermined, although according to historic aerials of the property, it appears to be present before 1960 thus making the resource potentially eligible based upon its age. The shed is clad in standing seam aluminum siding with a door on the west elevation and a window opening on the south elevation, although the window is not installed. The shed has a lean-to shed roof, supported by simple rectangular posts, that extends the full length of the north elevation. There is a second short lean to roof enclosed on either side on the east elevation that appears to be used as dry storage for firewood or other materials. The shed is capped by an angled flat roof covered in rolled roofing material with the overall condition of the roofs being relatively poor and covered in a large amount of biological growth. The approximated dimensions of the shop shed are as follows: Width- 273cm/8.96ft, Length-800cm/26.25ft, Height-290cm/9.21ft (not including lean to roof additions). The wood storage addition on the north side of the shop shed measures approximately: Width-245cm/8:04ft, Length-700cm/22.97ft, Height-180cm/5.91ft. The smaller addition of the east side of shop shed measures approximately: Width- 175cm/5.68ft, Length-273cm/8.96ft, Height-180cm/5.91ft. Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 5 of 5 dc�h -- p D7T OI a:CI WCIGC" IIISTOPIC PRESERV4TICN Location Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Apple Shed (Shed 2) Address: Geographic Areas: information Number of stories: Construction Dates: Construction Type Built Date Property ID: 710092 36818 8th Ave S, Federal Way, Washington, USA King Certified Local Government, King County, T21R04E32, POVERTY BAY Quadrangle N/A Year Circa 1930 r Historic Use: Category Subcategory Agriculture/Subsistence Agriculture/Subsistence - Storage Historic Context: Category Agriculture Architect/Engineer: Category Name or Company Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 1 of 4 dah ii3fPiL �!35Ea4n�iICY Thematics: Historic Property Report Resource Name: Local Registers and Districts Name Date Listed Project History Project Number, Organization, Project Name 2016-07-04887, , Demolition of Meers Homestead William J. Meers Homestead - Apple Shed (Shed 2) Notes Resource Inventory SHPO Determination 3/22/2017 Property ID: 710092 SHPO Determined By, Determined Date Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 2 of 4 Historic Property Report Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Apple Property ID Shed (Shed 2) Photos Shed 2—facing northeast.JPG Shed 2—facing east.JPG 710092 Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 3 of 4 Appendix C: Archaeological Site File Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Page 28 cf--thpHistoric Property Report 010-71-1 Resource Name: William J. Meers Homestead - Apple Property ID: 710092 GYfol RcltefQOG,. Shed (Shed 2) HISTORIC f F.ESERv.FTIGN Inventory Details - 3/22/2017 Common name: William J. Meers House Apple Shed Date recorded: 3/22/2017 Field Recorder: Kenny Gunn Field Site number: SHPO Determination Detail Information Characteristics: Category Item Form Type Utilitarian Roof Type Gable Roof Material Metal - Corrugated Cladding Wood - Board & Batten Structural System Wood - Balloon Frame Plan Rectangle Surveyor Opinion Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places: Yes Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local): No Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local): No Significance narrative: The Apple Shed, referred to as Shed 2, located on the William J. Meers Homestead is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based upon its age and association with the homestead as a whole. The shed structure is in poor condition and is overgrown with vegetation. Physical description: This small shed, which is located between the deteriorated barn and the large shed to the north, has been referred to as the "Apple Shed" and is currently heavily overgrown by blackberry vines. The construction date and original function of this shed is undetermined, although according to historic aerials of the property, it appears to be present before 1960 thus making the resource potentially eligible based upon its age. The simple rectangular structure is clad in vertical board -and -batten with a single small door and a small window that is missing its glass. The small wood frame structure is covered by a gable roof with rusted standing seam aluminum panels. The approximate dimensions of the apple shed are as follows: Width-320cm/10.50ft, Length- 400cm/13.12ft, Height-300cm/9.84ft. Friday, May 19, 2017 Page 4 of 4 cbh STATE OF WASHINGTON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM IIi51LPi- 'k ESERV aIi Smithsonian Number: 45 County: King Date: 5/12/2017 Human Remains? r DAHP Case No.: Compiled By: Sarah Amell Aqua Terra Cultural Resource Consultants Archaeological Sites are exempt from public disclosure per RCW 42.56.300 SITE DESIGNATION Site Name: William J. Meers Barn Field/Temporary ID: Site Type: Historic Agriculture As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this request for determination of eligibility meet the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the site r meets I- does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: Criteria Statement of Signifigance The barn does not retain integrity. It is heavily deteriorated and nearing demolished status due to previous damage from a fire. It would be difficult to accurately reconstruct or restore the barn to its original form due to the degree of deterioration. Integrity SHPO Determination Eligibility Survey/Inventory Determined On Determined By SHPO Comments SITE LOCATION USGS Quad Map Name(s): POVERTY BAY T: 21 R: 04 E/W: E Section: 32 UTM: Zone: 10 Easting: 551146 Northing: 5235471 Latitude: 47.271 Longitude:-122.324 Elevation (ft/m): 30 Drainage, Major: Puyallup Drainage, Minor: Hylebos Creek- River Mile Frontal Commencement Bay Aspect Slope ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number:45 Page 2 of 20 Location Description (General to Specific): The William J. Meers Barn is located in a rural area south of the town of Federal Way in King County, Washington, on a large parcel identified by the King County Department of Assessments as identification number: 322104-9112. The town of Federal Way, a large urban area 20-miles south of Seattle Washington, is located approximately 3.5-miles to the north. The 30-acre parcel is surrounded by other large parcels with single-family residential and agriculture resources varying is age, style, and materials. The Meers Barn is located on the east side of 8th Avenue South, approximately one -quarter mile north of the intersection of South 373rd Street and 8th Avenue South. Interstate 5 runs north -south approximately one-third mile east of the historic farmstead. The historic Meers Barn is centrally located along the western border of the parcel boundary right off of 8th Avenue South. Directions (For Relocation Purposes): To arrive at the Meers Barn at the site address of 36818 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003, go on Interstate 5 going North and take exit 137. Continue onto WA-99 N/54th Ave E after 0.2 miles turn right onto WA-99 N/ Pacific Hwy E. After following this road for 2.6 miles take a right onto S 373rd St and then turn left at the 1st cross street onto 8th Ave S and the property will be on the right-hand side of the road. Narrative Description (Overall Site Observations): The William J. Meers House & Farm is significant as one of the few surviving historic homesteads present in the rural area of Federal Way, Washington. The property contains a number of historic structures including a vertical plank house, two sheds, a pump house, cistern, and the historic barn this document is concerned with. Although there is little information known about the function of the property over the last 125-years, it has been owned and operated by several different individuals and families resulting in a dynamic history that includes many alterations and additions. The property was included in a Homestead Land Claim Patent filed by William J. Meers, which was approved on November 23, 1891 (Reference Number: WASAA 071629). William J. Meers was born on February 8, 1866 in California to Mary and William Meers. William had multiple siblings and eventually made his was to Washington State by his early twenties. On October 22, 1888, shortly before building the Meers House, he married Josephine Martin when he was 22 years old and they had their only child a year later on September 10, 1889 named Sadie Meers. It is unknown if Meers built the house himself or had it commissioned, however it is assumed that is was constructed to serve as his family house. By 1900, King County property and tax records show the original 30-acre parcel as being subdivided into two separate 10 and 20 acre tracts, although an individual by the name of "M.A. Blouvelt" pays all of the taxes for the property through 1930. M.A., or Martha, is Josephine Martin's, William's wife, sister who was married to a Charles Blouvelt. Both the Meer's and Blouvelt's live on the property through the 1930's with several census records listing Charles Meers as a "General Farmer" at the address, although the Blouvelt's pay the entire taxes based on records. According to 1934 property and tax records, the William J. Meers House was sold to H.D. Maxwell and Elizabeth Davies. There are several references to a barn fire in 1937 that completely destroyed the barn on the property and that a new barn was built in its place. This may mean that the current barn is the 1937 barn, although this has not been confirmed. The Meers House and Farm was purchased by William Larson in 1964 from Elizabeth Davies. Larson would live in the house for decades and eventually the house and farm would be deeded to his descendants listed as Margaret Justice, Anna Butler, Mary Stobie, James Phillips, and Phillip Larson. The descendants of William Larson sold the house and farm to the City of Federal Way in December 2015; the city is listed as the current owner and is managing the resource as a vacant property. The Meers barn comprised of a main barn with a double high ceiling and single high ceiling sections on either side to the north and south. Three additions are located on the east and west sides of the main barn. The approximate dimensions of the main barn can be seen below. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 3 of 20 Site Dimensions (Overall Site Dimensions): Length: 60 Ft Direction: N-S Width: 30 Ft Direction: E-W Method of Horizontal Measurement: Tape/Pacing Depth: NA Method of Vertical Measurement: tape measure Vegetation (On Site): Local: blackberries, stinging nettle, Regional: grasses, dandelion Landforms (On Site): Local: Rolling hills Regional: Water Resources (Type): West Hylebos Creek Distance: 300 meters Permanence: 1 CULTURAL MATERIALS AND FEATURES Narrative Description (Specific Inventory Details): The barn currently located on the property is assumed to have been constructed circa 1940 and is mostly demolished with the only remaining material being the primary support posts, roofing supports and wood shingles, and vertical cladding boards primarily along the west elevation that combine to resemble that of a historic barn. The main barn is mostly demolished with the only remaining material being the primary support posts (Figure 7), roofing supports (Figure 9) and wood shingles, and vertical cladding boards (Figure 8) primarily along the west elevation that combine to resemble that of a historic barn. The rectangular planned main barn features a double height (approximately 25 ft high) central volume that appears to have been flanked by a single height (approximately 10 ft high) space on either side (north and south, Figure 1). The historic barn is supported by a framework of large posts that extend from ground to roof, (three on each side of the double height ceiling), many of which are rough cut and appear to have been minimally planned after being fallen trees (Figure 7). Some of the smaller supporting beams for the roof and horizontal supports also were roughly cut and likely were fallen trees or trees cut on the property that were not stripped of their bark (Figure 9). The vertical siding was nailed directly into the supporting beams. The roof of the double height ceiling section of the barn is a wooden shingled high gable with the single height ceiling sections containing likely a wooden shingled shed shaped roof meaning a single pitch roof that slopes from a high to a lower wall (Figure 3). Although, this is hard to discern as these sections of the barn are in ruin. The main barn has three additions, two on the east side and one on the west side. A smaller balloon framed structure is adjacent to the barn on the east side at the southern end of the main structure, this addition measured approximately 20 ft x 12 ft x 9 ft (Figure 5-6). This structure is covered in horizontal boards and capped by an angled metal roof. Another addition on the east side of the main barn at the northern end of the barn has a shed shaped metal roof with vertical cladding boards (Figure 10). The addition on the western side of the barn was likely of the same make as the single height ceiling sections of the main barn (Figure 11). The dimensions of the last two additions mentioned above as well as the exact layout of the barn were difficult to determine due to the barn being in ruin from neglect and the overgrowth of blackberries and stinging nettle. Although the barn is historic in its own right, there are notations that the original barn burned in the late 1930s implying that this may be a replacement built in its place circa 1940. Method of Collection: NA Location of Artifacts (Temporary/Permanent): On site SITE AGE Component Type Historic Dates circa 1940 Dating Method Historic Documents ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 4 of 20 Phase Basis for Phase Designation SIUMMAMRS Observed By Address Sarah Amell 5518 Trosper Lake St. SW, Tumwater, WA 98512 Date Recorded: 5/12/2017 Recorded by (Professional Archaeologist): Sarah Amell Organization: Aqua Terra Cultural Phone Number: 360-359-6701 Resource Consultants Address: 5518 Trosper Lake St. SW, Email: sarah@aquaterracrc.com Tumwater, WA 98512 SiTIE "ISTM Previous Archaeological Work: No previous assessment has been completed for the barn structure. UMOWNEMIP Owner Address Parcel City of Federal 36818 8th Ave S, Federal Way, WA - 98003 322104-9112 Way RESEARCH SI- - S ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number:45 Page 5 of 20 Items/Documents Used in Research: Ancestory.com. "William J. Meers Family Tree." www.ancestry.com Federal Way Library, 34200 1st Way South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Historical Society of Federal Way, 2645 South 312th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Landau Associates. "Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment, Larson Property, Federal Way, Washington." January 20, 2015. Kirchner, R.M. "The History of Spring Valley." Federal Way Review, April 14, 1955. Accessed March 20, 2017. King County Archives (Deeds & Records), 1215 East Fir Street, Seattle, WA 98122 King County Department of Assessments, Parcel Number: 322104-9112, http://biue.kingcounty.com/Assessor/eReaIProperty/default.aspx "M.A. Blouvelt House/Meers Homestead." King County Historic Sites Survey Inventory Sheet. King County Office of Historic Preservation. Prepared by: Tori Laughlin, March 27, 1986. Washington State Archives, Puget Sound Regional Branch, 3000 Landerholm Circle SE, IVIS- N100 Bellevue, WA 98007 https://www.sos.wa.gov/archives/archives_puget.aspx Williams J. Meers House Site Visits for Documentation, March 21-22, 2017, Performed by Kenny Gunn & Tyler Clouse (Summit Solutions Group), 36818 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Page 6 of 20 USGS MAP DI 0 �i Smithsonian Number: 45 vo i ! May 19, 2017 1:5,886 0 005 01 02— 0 01 02 Odkrn Copyright •� 2013 N 1h 1 Geographer $.—V -- ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 7 of 20 Source information SKETCH MAPS N illiai i J. Aleei's B3i'II Povert%- Bay ?.5,' 199 A. qua Teri a Cull¢fsi R:saurco- csusuHauLl ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Numher.45 Page 8 of 20 PHOTOGRAPHS PhotolD 341292 Title DSCN4756.J PG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? r Notes Overview of William J. Meers Barn facing West. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 9 of 20 0 0.01 0.02 0.04 Mies I - - - _ I 1. William J. Meers Barn I TwParcel Meers Bam Photol® 341303 Title MeersBarnsketchmap.jpg Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? r- Notes William J. Meers Property Sketch Map Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright r I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 10 of 20 Photo ID 341302 Title DSCN4774.JPG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? r- Notes Overview of root construction from the inside of the barn facing upwards. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 11 of 20 PhotolD 341301 Title DSCN4771.JPG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? r- Notes Overview of the vertical plank siding from the inside of the barn facing west. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 12 of 20 A) Photo ID 341300 Title DSCN4767.JPG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? F Notes Supporting beam structure from the inside of the barn facing west. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 13 of 20 4_ • .. •r .�'=3y�,y�► � f�; � is i Photo ID 341299 Title DSCN4765.JPG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? F— Notes overview of addition location facing northwest Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number:45 Page 14 of 20 Photo ID 341298 Title DSCN4763.JPG Year Taken Is Circa? F- Notes Addition on the southern end of main barn east side facing south. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright li, All 7.b lot, 'Ow 0 lu Oro. If It"'Ir �"ft ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 16 of 20 PhotolD 341296 Title DSCN4761.J PG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? r- Notes Overview of William J. Meers Barn facing south. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Page 17 of 20 -% OItA il -ir7 r}''.1'?t'�d i rrrs, ' Smithsonian Number: 45 �a�'+=� �: Ted �rr •:i . ,& ��� � - r Wo kin Photo ID 341295 Title DSCN4759.JPG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? r— Notes Overview of addition on the western side of the main barn. Addition in ruin and under overgrowth of blackberries. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright r— ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number' 45 Page 18 of 20 Photo ID 341294 Title DSCN4758.J PG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? r- Notes Overview of William J. Meers Barn facing east. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE INVENTORY FORM Smithsonian Number: 45 Page 19 of 20 Photol® 341293 Title DSCN4757.JPG Year Taken 2017 Is Circa? r- Notes Overview of William J. Meers Barn facing north. Type image/jpeg Photo View Source Copyright TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Jeff Wolf FROM: Jessic� §fone DATE: August 3, 2010 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES OMROMONM I GWWWO .0 I RE: WETLAND AND STREAM INVESTIGATION AND DELINEATION ENTICKNAP AND BRIDGES PROPERTIES FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON INTRODUCTION RECEIVED' JUN 12 2017 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT At the request of the City of Federal Way (City), Landau Associates conducted wetland and stream delineation on two properties consisting of five adjacent parcels (study area) located in Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). The Enticknap property consists of three parcels; parcel #3221049141, parcel #3221049123, and parcel #2921049112 (collectively called Enticknap property), owned by Ruth Enticknap, located east of 81h Avenue South and west of 12d' Avenue South. The Bridges property consists of two parcels; parcel #2921049118 and parcel #2921049103 (collectively called Bridges property), owned by David Bridges, located east of 8'h Avenue South and west of 121h Avenue South. Two additional adjacent parcels were investigated as part of the study area for stream and wetland continuity, and they include the Larson property which consists of parcel #32210491 l2 and the Gowers property which consists of parcel #2921049113. This technical memorandum presents the results of the wetland and stream delineations and is provided for use by the City to assess and document the condition of the study area. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject properties are located within the Puyallup/White watershed (Water Resource Inventory Area 10), Hylebos Creek basin in Township 21N, Range 4 E, Section 29 and 32, and east of 8`h Avenue South, north of 372"d Way. The study area for the wetland and stream investigation consists of the subject properties, plus the surrounding 200 R which represents the maximum buffer width for critical areas under the City of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). The Enticknap property consists of 12.71 acres and the Bridges property consists of 17.22 acres in size. The Enticknap property primarily consists of forested land and contains one man-made pond and the North fork of West Hylebos Creek (Hylebos Creek) running through its northwestern section. The Bridges property primarily consists of herbaceous and scrub -shrub vegetation with a large forested area located immediately west of 121h Avenue South and contains two man-made ponds with Hylebos Creek running through the property. The Larson property 950 Pacific Avenue, Suite 515 • Tacoma, WA 98402 . (253) 926-2493 . fax (253) 926-2531 • www.landauinc.com consists of mostly previously cleared areas with Hylebos Creek running through a forested wetland along its northeast corner. The Gowers property consists of a large emergent wetland with a minor tributary of Hylebos Creek through the central and southern portions. METHODS This section presents the methods used to delineate the wetlands and streams in the subject properties. The extent of wetlands and streams off the subject properties was observed from within the subject properties' boundaries. Estimation of the extent of offsite wetlands and streams was made from field observations and readily available public domain resources as described below. BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW Landau Associates reviewed the following public domain resources to determine existing conditions and potential wetlands and streams within the study area: • Aerial photographs from 1936 to 1997 (King County website 2009) • Topographic map (USGS 1993; see Attachment A) ■ National Wetlands Inventory maps (USFWS 1981 to present; see Attachment A) • Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) Soil Survey (MRCS 2006 website various dates; Attachment B) • County and National Hydric Soils Lists (USDA, NRCS 2010) ■ StreamNet Interactive Mapping, including the Pacific Northwest Mapper (StreamNet website a; various dates) • WDNR Forest Practices Application Review System, Water Type Map (WDNR website 2007) • Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Natural Heritage Program (WDNR website 2009) • City of Federal Way critical areas maps (City of Federal Way 2005) • City of Federal Way riparian corridor property acquisitions and preliminary stream layout map (City of Federal Way 2010) • WSDOT I-5 SR18/SR161 interchange improvement plants (WSDOT 2009) • King County Imap, Sensitive Areas Map set (King County website 2009). 8/3110 Y:\238\057.030\R\Wet1and Enticknap-Bridges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION Landau Associates wetland ecologists Sacha Maxwell and Jessica Stone conducted the wetland and stream investigation on the Enticknap property on July 8, 2009; Landau Associates wetland ecologists Perry Welch, PWS, and Jessica Stone conducted supplemental wetland and stream investigations on the Enticknap property on April 19, 2010 and wetland and stream investigations on the Bridges property on May 12, 2010. All site visits were conducted within the official growing season recognized by the Seattle District USACE (1994). The weather during .the July 8, 2009 site reconnaissance was sunny and 70 degrees, partly cloudy and 55 degrees during the April 19, 2010 site visit, and 65 degrees and sunny during the May 12, 2010 site visit. Field investigation site photographs are found in Attachment E. Wetland Identification and Delineation The wetland investigation was conducted in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987), the USACE Regional Guidance letter on the 1987 Manual (USACE 1994), the USACE Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (USACE 2008) and the Washington State Department of Ecology's (Ecology's) Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). The USACE and Ecology recommend a preliminary data gathering and synthesis of available background information, followed by a field investigation. The delineation was conducted using the routine methodology, which includes a three -parameter approach to determine the presence or absence of wetlands that requires evaluating vegetation, soil, and hydrology (Table 1). Following this method, an area is determined to be wetland if all of the following three criteria are met: • The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic • Soils are hydric • Wetland hydrology is present. Data on vegetation, soils, and hydrology was recorded on data sheets (Attachment C) as sampling plots (SPs) located in areas meeting the mandatory wetland criteria, and in nearby upland to determine corresponding wetland/upland boundaries. The wetland boundaries were delineated using numbered flagging. The boundaries of wetlands extending outside of the study were estimated based on views from the study area and aerial photographs and/or other information from the background information review. 8/3110 YA238\057.030\R\Wetland Enticknap-Bridges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 3 Stream Delineation The ordinary high watermark (OHWM) of streams within the study area was delineated based on the methodology provided by Ecology (Olson and Stockdale 2008), which focuses on examining existing hydrologic data and observation of field indicators including hydrology, soil and sediment, vegetation, and marks of scouring, etc. All data points were marked using labeled flagging. The boundaries of streams extending outside of the study were estimated based on views from the study area and aerial photographs and/or other information from the background information review. SURVEY AND MAPPING Locations of features identified in the field, including wetland or stream flagging, sample plots, key habitat features, and/or key structures were recorded using a Trimble global positioning system (GPS) hand-held device, and maps were prepared using ArcView GIS software by Landau Associates. The average accuracy of the field surveyed points is +/- 1.4 ft with the lowest accuracy being +/- 4.5 ft and the highest accuracy being .1 ft. The field survey accuracy is such that the results are intended for planning purposes only, and should not be used as professional survey boundaries for design, permitting, and/or construction applications. Additional surveying was conducted on select points and features on the Enticknap property by Baseline Engineering Inc. WETLAND AND STREAM CLASSIFICATION, RATING AND BUFFER WIDTH Wetlands identified and/or delineated as part of this project were classified according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS's) Cowardin classification system (Cowardin et al. 1979) and the USACE's hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification system (Brinson 1993). Wetlands were rated according to the Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington (Hruby 2004; Attachment D). This system categorizes wetlands based on their existing functions, including water quality, hydrology, and habitat, as well as the wetland's rarity, sensitivity to disturbance, or irreplaceability. Wetlands were also rated according to the FWRC. Wetland buffers were determined according to Section 19.175.020 (Wetland categories and standard buffers) of the FWRC. Streams were classified according Section 19.05.130 (M definitions) and stream set -backs (buffer widths) were determined according to Chapter 19.165.010 (Setbacks) of the FWRC. RESULTS This section presents the results of the background information review and the wetland and stream delineations. Information on the wetland ratings and stream classifications is also provided in this section. 8/3/10 YA238\057.030\R\Wetland Enticknap-Bridges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION REVIEW The Soil Survey Geographic database (USDA, NRCS 2006) maps six soil series within the study area: 1) Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes (AgC); 2) Bellingham silt loam (Bh); 3) Everett gravelly sandy loam 5-15 percent slopes (EvC); 4) Shalcar muck (Sm); 5) Snohomish silt loam (So); and 6) Tukwila Muck (Tu) (see Attachment B). Soils within the study area that are listed on the Hydric Soils List for King County include AgC and Bh (within depressions), Sm, So (within depressions and floodplains), and Tu (USDA, NRCS 2010). The FEMA floodplain maps identify the onsite and offsite properties as Zone X (areas outside the 1-percent annual chance floodplain) (FEMA website 2009). StreamNet (StreamNet website a, various dates) and WDNR (WDNR website 2007) identify the following stream located within the study area: • A branch of Hylebos Creek (LLID 1223590472610) Tributary to Puget Sound. The City critical areas map shows the above -listed stream and a large wetland complex on the subject properties. The National Wetlands Inventory shows a large wetland complex (herein referred to as Wetland A) within the vicinity of the study area. Wetland A is mapped as including the following community types: palustrine emergent, scrub -shrub, forested, and aquatic bed/open water (Cowardin classification; Cowardin et al. 1979). Attachment A provides the NWI maps. FIELD INVESTIGATION Onsite portions of a wetland complex and eleven streams were investigated within the study area. Hylebos Creek flows from the north and enters the study area at the northern property boundary between the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118) and the Gowers property (Parcel #2921049113) and extends down into the Enticknap property (Parcel #3221049141). The remaining streams identified are entirely within Wetland A. Streams Enticknap Stream 1 and Enticknap Stream 2 are entirely within the Enticknap property and Bridges Streams 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are entirely within the Bridges property. Bridges Stream 1 and Bridges Stream 2 start on the Bridges property (Parcel 2921049103) and extend down onto the Enticknap property (Parcels 42921049112 and 3221049141). An additional stream located on the Gowers property, Gowers Stream, was identified in Wetland A north of the Bridges property. The stream and wetland locations are also shown on Figure 2 and summarized in Table 2. The total onsite wetland and buffer areas and stream length were calculated for each of the properties. Stream buffer areas were not calculated because they fall within either wetland or wetland buffer areas. The onsite wetland and buffer areas are summarized in the table below and described in detail for each parcel in Table 2. 6/3/10 YA238\057.030\R\Wet1and Enticknap-Bridges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES R Property Property Size Onsite Wetland Onsite Buffer Major Streams Minor Streams Area Area Length Length Enticknap Property 12.70 acres 5.06 acres 4.71 acres 511 ft 76 ft Bridges Property 17.29 acres 14.32 acres 2.90 acres 1,653 ft 1,266 ft Total for Study Area 29.99 acres 19.38 acres 7.61 acres 2,164 ft 1,342 ft A state-owned drainage easement (not mapped) is located east of Parcel #3221049123 on the Enticknap property and intersects Bridges Stream 1 within a culvert at approximately the intersection of the Enticknap and Bridges property parcels. A grate in the culvert (labeled as outfall from state drainage structure on Figure 2) is located at the approximate intersection point. Based on conversations with City staff, the drainage easement contains a pipe that discharges to Bridges Stream 1. The direction of water flow within the grate was not visible during the site visit, nor could field staff confirm that water was discharging from the state drainage structure to Bridges Stream 1. Detailed data on vegetation, soil, and hydrology parameters was recorded at sample plots throughout the subject properties. A summary of these parameters, as well as the classification, rating, and buffer width for each wetland and stream within the study area are presented below. Sample plot data sheets are included in Attachment C. Wetland A Wetland A is an approximately 29-acre palustrine forested and emergent/depressional (Cowardin/HGM classification) wetland. All three mandatory wetland criteria are satisfied for Wetland A (see Attachment C). Vegetation in Wetland A is diverse and includes tree, shrub, emergent, and aquatic bed vegetation layers. Typical dominant hydrophytic species include a canopy of red alder (Alnus rubra), with western red cedar (Thuja plicata), shrub layer dominated by salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), and a ground layer with skunk cabbage (Lysichiton americanum) and small -fruit bulrush (Scirpus microcarpus). Emergent and scrub -shrub vegetation include spirea (Spiraea douglasii), cattail (Typha latifolia), small - fruit bulrush (Scripus microcarpus), and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) (see data plots for additional species). Soils in Wetland A are indicated to be hydric based on hydric soils criteria such as presence of redox dark surface (indicator 176), hydrogen sulfide (indicator A4) odors, and loamy mucky mineral (indicator F1). Indicators of wetland hydrology include oxidized rhizospheres and saturated soil and/or a high water table (standing water present at the time of all three field investigations). Wetland A is a headwater wetland for Hylebos Creek and covers approximately 40 percent of the Enticknap property and approximately 83 percent of the Bridges property. Wetland and wetland buffer coverage for each parcel is shown on Table 2. Hydrology in Wetland A is sustained primarily by a high groundwater table, 8/3/10 Y:M8\057.030\R\Wet1and Enticknap-Bddges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 0 but also receives hydrology from hillside springs, precipitation, and overbank flooding from the ponds and riverine systems. The Enticknap pond located within Wetland A was apparently excavated in the 1970s (Enticknap, R., 2009, personal communication) and the two Bridges ponds (East and West) were excavated sometime between 1960 and 1969 based on aerial photographs (Landau Associates 2009). Beaver activity is also present on the Enticknap pond and both Bridges ponds. Wetland A is rated as a Category 2 wetland under the Ecology wetland rating system (see Attachment D) and as a Category 1 wetland under the FWRC. Under the FWRC a wetland is rated as a Category I if it contains species recognized by state or federal agencies as endangered or threatened. Coho salmon, a federal species of concern, and steelhead, a federally threatened species, have been sited in Hylebos Creek (StreamNet website a, various dates) (WDFW website 2009) (Appleton, W., 2009, Personal Communication). Hylebos Creek runs directly through Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118) and through the northwest corner of the Enticknap property (Parcel #3221049141). Additionally, Bridges Streams 1, 7 and 8 and Enticknap Streams 1 and 2 are major fish -bearing streams that connect to Hylebos Creek. Wetland A contributes to stream health and habitat by shading of the creeks, contribution of woody debris, and nutrient cycling. The FWRC requires a 200-ft standard buffer width for Category 1 wetlands. The wetland, streams, and buffer areas within the subject properties are shown on Figure 2. Streams Hylebos Creek is a permanently flowing major stream that flows into the Puget Sound via the Hylebos Waterway, which drains into Commencement Bay in Tacoma. From its headwaters in Federal Way, West Hylebos Creek flows into the Bridges property (parcel #2921049118) from the north, and flows to the south through the center of the parcel and into the northeast corner of the Enticknap property (parcel # 3221049141) where it then flows to the northwest back into the Bridges property. It then flows to the west and under 8th Avenue South. Within the study area, Hylebos Creek receives water from Wetland A and from Bridges Streams 1, 5, 7, 8 and 9, and the Gowers Stream. At the time of the field investigation, water depth in the channel within the study area ranged from 4 to 15 inches and was flowing south and then west. Channel bank -full width ranges from 6 to 10 ft. Substrate is composed of silt, gravel and fine to medium sand. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 1 is a permanently flowing major stream that is a tributary to Hylebos Creek. The upper 200 ft of Bridges Stream 1 is a minor stream as its size diminishes upstream and does not offer fish habitat. Bridges Stream 1 originates from a spring at the northern end of the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049103) and flows to the south where it continues through the Enticknap property (Parcel 8/3/10 YA238\057,030\R\Wetland Enticknap-Bridges_ rn.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 7 42921049112) and then flows west between the Bridges and Enticknap Properties where it then connects to Hylebos Creek. Bridges Stream 1 receives water from springs flowing from the hillside along the eastern edge of Wetland A, as well as Bridges Streams 2 and 3, and Enticknap Streams 1 and 2 and possibly from an outfall maintained by the State of Washington. At the time of the field investigation, water depth in the channel within the study area ranged from 2 to 4 inches and was flowing west. Channel bank -full width ranges from 2 to 15 ft. The channel bank is typically less than 8 inches in height. Substrate is composed of silt and fine to medium sand. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 1 shows up on 1936 aerial photograph though its course appears to have been modified since that time (King County website 2009). Bridges Stream 2 is an intennittent flowing minor tributary to Bridges Stream l which drains the portion of Wetland A located on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049103) and flows south to the Enticknap property (Parcel # 2921049112) where it drains into Bridges Stream 1. At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 2 was approximately 1 ft wide and water depth ranged from 2 to 4 inches. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of shrub and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 3 is a short permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118). At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 3 consisted primarily of a small spring that flows to the south into Bridges Stream 1. Bridges Stream 4 is a permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property. At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 4 was approximately 3 ft wide and water depth ranged from 1 to 2 inches. The stream begins near the northwest corner of Parcel #2921049103 where it flows to the south and connects to the East Bridges Pond on Parcel #2921049118. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of shrub and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 5 is a permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118). At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 5 was approximately 2 ft wide with a water depth of 1.5 inches. The stream flows west through a short culvert and then connects to Hylebos Creek. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 6 is a permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118). At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 6 was approximately 2 ft wide with a water depth of 5 inches. The water source for Bridges Stream 6 is an artesian well. From the well it flows approximately 100 ft west and into the West Bridges Pond. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. 8/3/10 YA23M57.030%R Welland Enbcknap-&idges_1m.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 8 Bridges Stream 7 is a permanently flowing major stream that provides an outlet to the East Bridges Pond on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118) and flows west to Hylebos Creek. At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 7 was approximately 6 ft wide with a water depth of 7 inches. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 8 is a permanently flowing major stream that is an outlet to the West Bridges Pond on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118) and flows southwest to Hylebos Creek. At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 8 was approximately 2.5 ft wide with a water depth of 5 inches. The stream flows west through a short culvert and then connects to Hylebos Creek. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Bridges Stream 9 is a permanently flowing minor stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Bridges property (Parcel #2921049118). At the time of the field investigation, Bridges Stream 9 was approximately 3 ft wide with a water depth of 1 inch. The stream begins at a hillside spring near the eastern side of the Bridges property, and then flows to the east through a short culvert and then connects to Hylebos Creek. Substrate is composed of silt. Riparian vegetation consists of tree, shrub, and emergent wetland species. Enticknap Stream 1 is a permanently flowing major stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Enticknap property (Parcel #3221049123). At the time of the field investigation, Enticknap Stream 1 was approximately 3 ft wide with a water depth of 4 inches. The stream forms the outlet to the Enticknap Pond, where it flows north and becomes a tributary to Bridges Stream 1. Substrate is composed of silt. Riparian vegetation consists of shrub and emergent wetland species. Juvenile coho salmon were observed near the confluence of these waterways. Enticknap Stream 2 is a short (approximately 25 ft) permanently flowing major stream located entirely within Wetland A on the Enticknap property (Parcel #3221049141). At the time of the field investigation, Enticknap Stream 2 was approximately 3 ft wide with a water depth of 2 to 4 inches. The stream flows to the north and connects to Bridges Stream 1. Substrate is composed of muck. Riparian vegetation consists of tree and shrub wetland species. With the exception of Hylebos Creek, the streams within the study area were most likely constructed to drain and channel water out of Wetland A to allow for farming and livestock grazing. The streams were most likely excavated at the same time as the ponds. Based on historical aerial photographs, both Bridges ponds were excavated between 1960 and 1969, and the Enticknap pond was excavated in 1970. Discussion with the Enticknap property landowner (Enticknap, R., 2009, personal communication) revealed that species of trout (likely to be resident cutthroat trout, (Oncorhynchus clarki)) are present within the Enticknap pond in Wetland A (Parcels #2921049112 and 3221049123). Ruth Enticknap 813/10 YA238\057.030\R\Wetland Enticknap-Bddges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES Xi indicated they were not stocked, but instead migrated via Hylebos Creek and Bridges Stream 1 and Enticknap Stream 1 into the pond. Since both of the Bridges ponds in Wetland A (Parcel #2921049118) are directly connected to Hylebos Creek through Bridges Stream 7 and Bridges Stream 8, it is assumed that fish species are also present. Additionally, several species of salmon are reportedly present in Hylebos Creek and its tributaries (StreamNet website a, various dates) (Appleton, W., 2009, Personal Communication). Juvenile coho salmon were observed throughout Hylebos Creek in the spring of 2010, as well as at the confluence of Enticknap Stream 1 and Bridges Stream 1. Landau Associates observed resident cutthroat trout in Hylebos Creek during the May 12, 2010 field investigation. Although fish presence was not identified at the time of the field investigations in Bridges Streams 1, 7, 8 and Enticknap Streams 1 and 2, they are directly connected to Hylebos Creek, do not contain any fish barriers, and contain fish habitat. Therefore, Hylebos Creek, Bridges Streams 1, 7, 8 and Enticknap Streams 1 and 2 are considered Type F, fish -bearing streams per DNR typing system and are classified as a "major streams" by the City (the City classifies any stream, and its tributaries, which contains or supports, resident or migratory fish as a major stream). Major streams require a 100-ft standard set -back, in accordance with the FWRC. Due to their size or lack of fish habitat, Bridges Streams 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and the upper reach of Bridges Stream 1 are not considered to contain any fish presence and are considered Type N, non -fish bearing streams per DNR typing system and are classified as a "minor streams" by the City. USE OF THIS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM The findings presented herein are based on our understanding of City of Federal Way Code, the USACE and Ecology wetland delineation methodology, Ecology's OHWM delineation methodology, and on our interpretation of the vegetative, soil, and hydrology conditions observed during the field delineation. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, the findings presented in this technical memorandum were prepared in accordance with generally accepted sensitive area investigation principles and practices in this locality at the time the technical memorandum was prepared. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. This technical memorandum was prepared for the use of the City. No other party is entitled to rely on the information, conclusions, and recommendations included in this document without the express written consent of Landau Associates and/or the City. Further, the reuse of information, conclusions, and recommendations provided herein for extensions of the project or for any other project, without review and authorization by Landau Associates, shall be at the user's sole risk. Wetland areas delineated by Landau Associates are considered preliminary until the USACE and/or local jurisdictional agencies validate the wetland boundaries. Because wetlands are dynamic 8t3110 Y1238\057.03M Wetland Enticknap-Bridges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 10 communities, wetland boundaries may change over time. The agencies typically recognize wetland delineations for a period of five years following an approved jurisdictional determination. In addition, changes in government code, regulations, and/or laws may occur that affect regulation of wetlands or streams characterized herein. REFERENCES Appleton, W., 8 October 2009. Personal communication (conversation with Jennifer Wynkoop and Jessica Stone, Landau Associates, Inc., regarding fish presence in Hylebos Creek.) William Appleton, City of Federal Way. Brinson, M. 1993. Final Report: A Hydrogeomorphic Classification for Wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. East Carolina University, Biology Department. Greenville, North Carolina. Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. August. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Government Printing Office. Washington, D.C. Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication No. 96-94. Washington State Department of Ecology. Olympia, Washington. March. Enticknap, R. 13 July 2009. Personal communication (conversation with Jessica Stone, Landau Associates, Inc., regarding subject properties and property at 36817 12`h Avenue South). Ruth Enticknap, Federal Way, WA. Federal Way, City of. 2010. Riparian Corridor Property Acquisitions Preliminary Stream Layout Map. City of Federal Way, SWM division. Map date: May 11. Federal Way, City of. 2005. City of Federal Way Stream Ratings. City of Federal Way, GIS Division. Map date: January 2005. FEMA website. 2009. Firmette. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Accessible from Map Service Center: h ://mse.fema. ov/weba /wcs/stores/servlet/FemaWelcomeView?store1d=l0001 &catalogld=10001&Ian ld=-L Accessed January. Greytag Macbeth. 1994. Munsell Soil Color Charts. New Windsor, New York. Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington — Revised. Publication No. 04-06-025. Washington State Department of Ecology. Olympia, Washington. King County website. 2009. ht#p://www.metroke.,Qov/GIS/imap. King County iMAP. Accessed June 30, 2009. Landau Associates 2009. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Enticknap property, East of 8" Avenue South, North of 372nd Way, Federal Way, Washington. Prepared for the City of Federal Way. August 21. NRCS. 2006. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 6.0. G.W. Hurt and L.M. Vasilas (eds.). United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service in 8/3/10 YA238\057.030\R\Welland Enticknap-Bridges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES II cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. URL:ftp:Hftp- fc.se.e-aQy.usda.gov/NSSC/Hydric Soils/FieldIndicators v6 0. df Accessed July 30, 2009. Olson, P. and E. Stockdale. 2008. Determining the Ordinary High Water Mark. on Streams in Washington State. Draft. Publication No. 08-06-001. Washington State Department of Ecology. April. Available at: htip://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0806001.html Reed, P.B., Jr. 1993. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). Available at hqp://www.fws.vov/nwi/bha/list88.html. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biol. Rep. 88 (26.9). Washington, D.C. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary. Available at littp://www.fws.gov/riwi/bha/list8g.html. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. StreamNet Website a. Various dates. Pacific Northwest Mapped. URL: Available at: http://map.streamnet.org/website/. Accessed February 9, 2009. USACE. 2008. Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. Technical Report ERDC/EL TR-08-13. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory. Vicksburg, Mississippi. April. USACE. 1994. Washington Regional Guidance on the 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Regulatory Branch. May 23. USACE. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Mississippi. March. USDA, NRCS. 2010. National Hydric Soils List. Available at http://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric/lists/state.htm] Accessed May 27. USDA, NRCS. 2006. Soil Survey Geographic Database. Available at http://soildatainart.nres.usda.govl. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. Ft. Worth, Texas. USFWS. 1981 to present. National Wetlands Inventory Map. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. St. Petersburg, Florida. USGS. 1993. Quadrangle, Washington 7.5-Minute Series (Topographic). Scale 1:24,000. U.S. Geological Survey. Denver, Colorado. WDFW website. 2009. Species of Concern in Washington State. Available at http-./Iwdfw.wa.gov/wlm/divers!y/soc/soo.htm. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Accessed October 7, 2009. WDNR website. 2009. Washington Natural Heritage Program. httR://wwwl.dnr.wa.ggv/nlip/refdesk/plants.html. Washington Department of Natural Resources. Accessed June 30, 2009. WDNR. 2007. Forest Practices Application Review System, Water Type Map. Available at htto://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/appl/fears/yiewer.htm. Accessed February 9, 2009. 8t3110 YA2381057.0301R\Wetland Enticknap-Bridges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 12 WDNR. 2007. StreamNet Interactive Mapper. Available at httQ:Ilrnap.strearnnet.orglwebsite/bluesnetmgpgerlyiewer.htm. Accessed February 9, 2009. WSDOT. 2009. I-5 SR181SR161 Interchange Improvements. Sheet EV2, 295 of 491. February 10. Attachments: Figure 1 —Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Table 1 — Methods for Wetland Determination Table 2 — Wetland and Stream Descriptions Table 3 — Wetland, Stream and Buffer Coverage Attachment A — Background Information Attachment B — Soils Series Descriptions Attachment C — Wetland Data Sheets Attachment D — Wetland Rating Forms Attachment E — Site Photographs 813110 YA238\057.030\R\Wet1and Enticknap-Bridges_tm.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES 13 —L- acoma Fife N m V X E m d w ; I � - 34Sth Wes: Hylebo¢ State Park — Federal Way Brook Lake'i 356th i I t/ Project Location I J u 0 0.5 w N Miles �i a" Data Source: ESRI 2008 F 3 Enticknap and Bridges Property LANDAU Federal Way, Washington ASSOCIATES some 1akeland North f J l$ 344th _S I_ a kP {'fin e i Mile L� Hlil T ,P$ c —, i Edgewood Itun -i ath urpri4 Lake Sqg are l {5ur06se lake I i Q Project E.creEt Location Seal, ae Spokane Tacoma Federal Way Washington Figure Vicinity Map 1 \ r f � � i _ _ 1 � 1 r 1 ` Y I r I � I ♦ I a 1 £E I OZ m IL y 1 ><l r al �; 1 C 1 a rn aa) r O I` Z I N # !n = I U ami I I ~y I O V. vr ,1 0-0 m CL cr c C7 rI1 \•?tea 1 y I Y 1 Hlb9£ S x �O !L N O 1\ \ O - a) @ N O. \ - fn �a) LN am \ C# m -� \ 7 \Y_ Y ?� O #� ,u c r rn_ Via) wa♦w' 1 Co a y N \ \• - 1 � m a ur • r J ..a[C11 LLt as sa6 u m �J - ♦ O E ul E r UN \ M m 0 CD O1 C \ ` f�A y • _ Colo O I CO iL - n , \ulmacn - cn ` COf] • ♦ l 00 r �ieQk N`l�e'00s co a r' CD� CD rn o E a rn N U) ad d L U rn m m m� � a r 1 x Air �Ott"- a °' O 0 a N Q N m M C # v d r c m wa S 9AV H18 S 3AV H1Z4 a 0 0 N a n� o H m -0 Lr) `° 0 E E V) N I co � ' N 'O O Q N o_ C E-. E O m 'O - O w iz_r aQ O m > C W N N U m '> O U. 2 E O -O U Q l7 m cc$ C«� Ow CD.0 comma -� ZI m m chi -O a s arnQin o m °'= ELE-O m2 J (n n m C C V O a T 7' r O (UO o m m '6 U C co O 'O N L N O O L U N 3 >� O- N a) O > CIS _O E C c a0 > E C cc a) m- O W 'X m C LL m O .- �c co (n N m- O O U a1 U l0 m a Q- Cc . ca n m o J �Q�dCU Z N Cl) Lek- - N rn LL a m Q a m O O � d C7 N fn w C 1) M O U m T (13 r a Y Q M 0 X U 3 cu Q) w 0 Q) U LL Z � ° U m m O C W m N 01 C U) Y I I m � o o d E E o aD m m ° C E Ip O7 cn cn U) E O O g8- mm CCc C G a m m E ca en w > m m ly O O r c -c > � ca m Z cn �Q J(D Page 1 of 1 TABLE 1 METHODS FOR WETLAND DETERMINATION Parameter Definition Field Indicators Field Assessment Wetland Vegetation (a) Wetland Soil (b) Wetland Hydrology (c) Wetland vegetation is adapted to saturated soil conditions. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has assigned a wetland indicator to each plant species that denotes its frequency of occurrence within wetlands. These are: ■ Obligate (OBL) wetland plants occur almost always in wetlands under natural conditions (more than 99 percent of the time). • Facultative wetland (FACW) plants usually occur in wetlands (67 to 99 percent of the time), but are occasionally found in nonwetlands. • Facultative (FAC) plants are equally likely to occur in wetlands or nonwetlands (34 to 66 percent of the time). • Facultative upland (FACU) plants usually occur in nonwetlands, but are occasionally found in wetlands (1 to 33 percent of the time). • Obligate upland (UPL) plans almost always occur in uplands (more than 99 percent of the time). Soil is classified as hydric, or possesses characteristics that are associated with reducing soil conditions. A hydric soil is formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil profile [within 10 inches below ground surface (BGS) or just below the A horizon, whichever is greater]. The area is inundated either permanently or periodically at mean water depths less than or equal to 6.6 ft, or The soil is inundated or saturated to the surface for at least 14 consecutive days during the growing season. (d) More than 50 percent of the dominant plants totaled from all vegetation strata are hyrdrophytic, i.e., those species with indicators of OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC—), or A plant community has a visually estimated cover percentage of OBL and FACW species that exceeds the coverage of FACU and UPL species. Modifiers: + Indicates a frequency toward the higher end of the category (more frequently found in wetlands). — Indicates a frequency toward the lower end of the category (less frequently found in wetlands). * A tentative assignment based on limited information from which to determine the indicator status. Hydric soil has an identifiable color pattern, which occurs if the soil is saturated, flooded, or ponded for a long period of time. Faint or washed-out colors typically form in the soil, and mottles of bright color, such as rust (known as redoxymorphic features), form. Accumulations of organic matter at the surface, a sulfur odor, and organic matter stains may also be present. Primary indicators of wetland hydrology include surface inundation (standing water), saturated soil, water marks, drift lines, sediment deposits, and drainage patterns. Secondary indicators of hydrology include water -stained leaves, oxidized root channels, or local soil survey data for identified soil. In the absence of any primary indicators, at least two secondary indicators are required to meet the wetland hydrology criterion. The dominant plants and their wetland indicator status are evaluated quantitatively within data plots and visually throughout the study area. A shovel is used to dig holes at least 16 inches BGS at multiple locations in the study area. Direct observation of the soil is made at multiple locations in both wetlands and uplands, as applicable. Soil organic content is determined visually and texturally, and soil color is determined using the Munsell soil color chart (Greytag Macbeth 1994). Depth to water saturation and/or inundation was also observed (see Wetland Hydrology). During investigation of soil, soil pits are allowed to stand up to 20 minutes in order to allow percolation of any groundwater into the pit to determine groundwater level in the soil profile. In addition, the extent of soil saturation and presence/absence of oxidized root channels are determined in the soil removed as part of the soil investigation (see Wetland Soil). The other indicators of wetland hydrology are observed at ground surface. (a) Categories were originally developed and defined by the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory and subsequently modified by the National Plant List Panel (Reed 1988; 1993). (b) USACE 1987; NRCS 2007. (c) USACE 1987. (d) The growing season in Western Washington is defined by the Seattle District of the USACE as occurring from March 1 to October 31. 8/3/10 YA238\057.030\R\Tb11 Methods for Wetland Determination.doc LANDAU ASSOCIATES TABLE 2 Page 1 of 1 WETLAND AND STREAM DESCRIPTIONS System Classification Category (Rating Agency) Buffer Width (City) Wetland A PFO,PEM1 E and AB3, II (Ecology) 200 ft Kbx / Depressional I (City) Hylebos Creek Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft Type F (DNR) Bridges Stream 1 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type F (DNR) Bridges Stream 2 Intermittent Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Tributary to Bridges Stream 1) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 3 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Tributary to Bridges Stream 1) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 4 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Flows to East Bridges Pond) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 5 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 6 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Flows to West Bridges Pond) Type N (DNR) Bridges Stream 7 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type F (DNR) Bridges Stream 8 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type F (DNR) Bridges Stream 9 Perennial Stream Minor Stream (City) 50 ft (Tributary to Hylebos Creek) Type N (DNR) Enticknap Stream 1 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Bridges Stream 1) Type F (DNR) Enticknap Stream 2 Perennial Stream Major Stream (City) 100 ft (Tributary to Bridges Stream 1) Type F (DNR) 8/3/2010 y:\238\057.030\R\Tbl 2 LANDAU ASSOCIATES /W V NQN W O L) w W LL LL M m W p J Z ma W N W E LL Ln O n LL to LO N LO LO O ` m C 01 N C_ C J c 0 F L~L U- W U- M LL N U- to LL 01 N LM C�, m N 1O rj C0 0) C S .y C 0 w u m u m ro V1 {� m u m u m a � V m v p v U- Ln OLn LL N LL y Ln 4A Ln V1 Ln O m p 00 N N O O e to 3 O0 ry -1 M N 00 p Oa1 00 N 'i ow v v m I u m m u m u m u m N m ruo LNY1 00 On U p v O3i O O) 01 V V LL v Ln LL .m.. Ln Ln N Ly Ln Ln LCO N N t n Q1 Ln M d co C Ln m m o0 C 3 N Ln' v n L8 N v m Lo vQjv a) u m u m u m u m u m u m 01 .-I LO Ln O N N O m N M fM O N Ln y u LV A LO v ^ CD l0 V �-+ LL LL LL r•+ LL LL M LL to Ln LO Ln -4 Ln Q1 LL H N Ln O1 a m m m oN � Ln a m � v n Lr Ln N N o Ln co N Ln P c-I M N 00 M Oi T T -i-I 0) aN-I M -q LT -ii Ql m w T 01 O O O .: O O 1-4 O O N N N N N N a G M M N O N N m Y U U U t U U u m m m eo � m m :+ c a o_ o_ '� ma W m U) w H Q U O cn Q Q a z f Cl) ATTACHMENT A Background Information E 3 0 0 0 Legend Sub Basins G.Th T rr k ■ + ' # _ t watershed (wRIA) •I i Boundaries = aJJP!111� s. ■ � � � �. � • �i^� ■ + ■f s r ' i �* * ■�■ Major Roads r_ �• ' r'. ..J - � Z Ir 91a10 Highway C4!• i' ` a US IIighway '' �:y�•R • - f ry � � � lnterslale {',\� .i Py �� .F .' r ■• .� Streets County CIA. � r'w to Bad• IooK fH ,�{ 1-•L� •� ti, ! 1 �f (» i Resermir - r363�_ ' f ti , j I e- Glacier r( —— i * ' S ti P '•\ � yr. ` lY O Marsh J. i ff i ��.. I h� ►}tif E ■ f {f� y • island El r�46Th{ �~■ s -f f wafer �' t j J �1 �+ # ■ r Streams • 1 ��1 rN ( wetlands ,� ,✓' + I �h AquaticBad 64 T ,. —. >! 1 r•r e I 1 C111 • �I St ".4 "' ��=' ■ Forested ' y �.� `r■ I wtr .� ShruW&Uub (- f fJ,37��5(1 r�. rll f Tidal Aquatic Bed t' I I Tidal Cmergent I !','' •a J _ ro ■ • • ' jf f Tidal Forested I .■, '7`1, { -.•. a ■ �srI'f t Tidal Shru h.'Scru b { . • w r k. �^r * USGS Topo Maps (24K) �i e Background r� I 2 f �' �#• � 'S' • �'r � -" ' .• � � �.,�' UnfocusedWashington — —� GTh water '—' ,,��•� _,� d,r,,,, , I Non•WashingtonLand , Cpn .� n two r ET i I 1- I ti I; ; �' General location ' � ;- '.i:� � t � , : � i,�� _ ❑ of Study Area i O i Y 3'� & rave( rk. Map created by the WA State Uepartmentof EcologyImp, m Source: Coastal Atlas Map, Washington State Department of Ecology: URL: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/atlas_home.html Enticknap and Bridges USGS TO O ra hic and LANDAU Properties p 9 p ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington USFW NWI Layers Figure A-1 W o W 0 o n p rn d m Na° o33y_ d 2 G Q m C c d A c W m R m v d Y W W !a c0 u NI cc} d W d A e c c W LL 6 yl Q C m y C 7 M Cf a t d 7 co d '° = °o m w c- E E U� w. O LM fi 'Q .`d. .`o. c c d d d d a r m Q Q O `O «d. L N M m A m L L L CI O ro m y C d .L. L • O L d L W Z I,7 ; 7 W m d Y t `m ; c O O o 0 H O a:C7 J W W li at LL J S K J 2 0 Z m Z U Q) U) Z ❑ 47-16-40 N 47-16-30 N 47-18-20 N 47-16-10 N 47-1&0 N G C C C s n C4 7 I C N Pm - 1 1 1e I 1 tu fL g Li) Z IV J I I— I-- �l Q � ♦ m Y (L N� 17 CI- N 0V-9L-L9 N 0£-9L-LV N OZ-94-Lb N 0V9Vi4 N 0-9VZO 3 L ii LL G G o c _C A� 2W v O U) LL ZN M C U 0 ` L N CU C: t CU Q CU Yak U N LU W N LL LU Q co Z� Q Q z C0 0 w s— — co O a C too w v o C� a a a r m . _ v cs3,� 1 El t 5 g ..r <jz w a t ,1 ` ti L 5.. m to OL IL r o CO > CL N i CM lz l Q vI r� O I�ti i D C N �. N N i Q 2 N O cu LOL O .N 2 0 Lf)� 0 o N ccu cu c cu CU N co L- 0 0 Q c �� w F- Z� Q¢ a T O �—' Mincc yAm� gp•gL-Cn EYn G 9 uj 4Icc 0 W w "• 'ai dl t RR 5a �Ln ' Lu Q x Q "7-'G'E .pia E�$ N d CC r�Lt `! a "E�� �� S CL M u c G p P. u :�Eaa Q 0 0 Q ATTACHMENT B Soils Series Descriptions Soil Map —King County Area, Washington (Enticknap and Bridges Properties) 47' 16' 29" 47° 16' 10" m m N Map Scale: 1:2,760 iF printed on A size (6.5" x 11 ") sheet b� r' WIL:ers N N 0 25 50 100 150 A Feet C. 100 200 400 600 47° 16 29" 47° 16' 10" USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 O N O � E 5 �' L N yy 'o N N 3 O J U tm 'O a) __ N m aria fn o O = im a O C y� O �1 O m m E r d U m `c `r N y O 0 y y c+I a) ai 0 0 U0 d y Z i m p N u E O a� 0 E L) (d N a 3 y c •(n Q L Z y CD? N O m d O = Q a Q O T m U) O N 7 2 N Y ¢ (n O y aCD p H or- O G O m aN 3 o 0 C CO 0= O a E O m T (DE� v C a �t� �a) V •W N a o y m E N = _ o a E N a •� U m N J f0 f0 Y y y L C G) CDCo CO `� a 07 Z� = E d= _ M m o m o� O `m O •O7 CV y C y O. Z >+ y (D 0 � N C O 'O N O O C m Coa Q m (0 L C G.L O a Om Vy Cn N C _ U `w MZQOy O O(n N y L a) m E �0 njUH2 to :a� (D E m E H V FL f' :S (n .= o y c m o 0 U t a y � _rn y y = 10 y N y _T O LL U O N .y. fn (ay .d. B > O a 0 a � `y IL T r N N U7 m m N y a' O a > O c o U O U F O N g a M 3 LL t' p a (n 0 a 3 � o a g o co co N Ilnl a E rOn N ry+ y N ~O m j l0 a O Cl C n In V S ii n ll �. m df0 O.np ma N 3 a -m o A o a Qy LL O O a > -0 m ` a) N O C0. O O C O y U) O O G n m U U C7 7 J J a a' (n (n N (n C) Cn C7 (n d a c � o lk Oi a IC y a N Q VJ O M O O N N � m N O) LO m a m Z Soil Map —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties Map Unit Legend King County Area, Washington (WA633) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Bh Bellingham silt loam 9.5 25.3% 2.7 7.3% EvC Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes 6.1 16.1 % Sm Shalcar muck Snohomish silt loam 0.5 1.4% So 4.7 12.5% Tu Tukwila muck 14.1 37.4% Totals for Area of Interest 37.7 100.0% L:S€'M Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 01111116 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes— Enticknap and Bridges Properties King County Area, Washington King County Area, Washington AgC—Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Elevation: 50 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period. 180 to 220 days Map Unit Composition Alderwood and similar soils: 95 percent Minor components: 5 percent Description of Alderwood Setting Landform: Moraines, till plains Parent material: Basal till with some volcanic ash Properties and qualities Slope: 6 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 24 to 40 inches to dense material Drainage class: Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 18 to 37 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity. Very low (about 2.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 4s Typical profile 0 to 12 inches: Gravelly sandy loam 12 to 27 inches: Very gravelly sandy loam 27 to 60 inches: Very gravelly sandy loam Minor Components Norma Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Depressions Bellingham Percent of map unit. 1 percent Landform: Depressions Seattle Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Depressions Tukwila Percent of map unit. 1 percent Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes — King County Area, Washington Landform: Depressions Shalcar Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Depressions Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 Enticknap and Bridges Properties USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 minim Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 Map Unit Description: Bellingham silt loam —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties King County Area, Washington Bh—Bellingham silt loam Map Unit Setting Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 150 to 210 days Map Unit Composition Bellingham and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Description of Bellingham Setting Landform: Depressions, drainageways Parent material: Alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity. Very high (about 12.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w Typical profile 0 to 11 inches: Silt loam 11 to 60 inches: Silty clay loam Minor Components Seattle Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions Alderwood Percent of map unit: 5 percent Everett Percent of map unit. 5 percent Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Map Unit Description: Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes —King County Area, Washington King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties EvC—Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes Map Unit Setting Mean annual precipitation: 30 to 45 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 180 days Map Unit Composition Everett and similar soils: 100 percent Description of Everett Setting Landform: Terraces Parent material: Glacial outwash with a component of volcanic ash in the upper part Properties and qualities Slope: 5 to 15 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacityof the most limiting layerto transmit water(Ksat): High(1.98 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity. Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e Typical profile 0 to 17 inches: Gravelly sandy loam 17 to 32 inches: Very gravelly sandy loam 32 to 60 inches: Very gravelly coarse sand Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 Map Unit Description: Shalcar muck —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties King County Area, Washington Sm—Shalcar muck Map Unit Setting Elevation: 50 to 700 feet Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 55 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 150 to 190 days Map Unit Composition Shalcar and similar soils: 75 percent Minor components: 25 percent Description of Shalcar Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material: Herbaceous organic material and/or alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Very poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: Frequent Available water capacity: High (about 10.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w Typical profile 0 to 14 inches: Muck 14 to 28 inches: Fine sandy loam 28 to 60 inches: Loamy sand Minor Components Tukwila Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Depressions Seattle Percent of map unit. 5 percent Landform: Depressions Norma Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions Puget Percent of map unit. 5 percent USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Shalcar muck —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties Landform: Depressions Snohomish Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Depressions Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data. Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 klew Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 Map Unit Description: Snohomish silt loam —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties King County Area, Washington So —Snohomish silt loam Map Unit Setting Elevation: 10 to 300 feet Mean annual precipitation: 22 to 50 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 50 degrees F Frost -free period: 160 to 220 days Map Unit Composition Snohomish and similar soils: 70 percent Woodinville and similar soils: 20 percent Minor components: 6 percent Description of Snohomish Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material: Alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches Frequency of flooding: Occasional Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity. High (about 11.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 5w Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w Typical profile 0 to 11 inches: Silt loam 11 to 17 inches: Clay loam 17 to 27 inches: Mucky peat 27 to 60 inches: Loamy fine sand Description of Woodinville Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material: Alluvium Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Snohomish silt loam —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties Frequency of flooding: Frequent Frequency of ponding: None Available water capacity. Very low (about 1.6 inches) Typical profile 0 to 7 inches: Silt loam Minor Components Seattle Percent of map unit. 2 percent Landform: Depressions Tukwila Percent of map unit. 2 percent Landform: Flood plains Shalcar Percent of map unit. 1 percent Landform: Flood plains Sultan Percent of map unit. 1 percent Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 Map Unit Description: Tukwila muck —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties King County Area, Washington Tu—Tukwila muck Map Unit Setting Elevation: 30 to 750 feet Mean annual precipitation: 35 to 80 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period. 150 to 200 days Map Unit Composition Tukwila and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Description of Tukwila Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material: Herbaceous organic material Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Very poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 0 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: Frequent Available water capacity., Very high (about 24.1 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability (nonirrigated): 5w Typical profile 0 to 19 inches: Muck 19 to 60 inches: Stratified diatomaceous earth to muck Minor Components Seattle Percent of map unit. 15 percent Landform: Depressions Bellingham Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Depressions Norma Percent of map unit. 2 percent Ur Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Tukwila muck —King County Area, Washington Enticknap and Bridges Properties Landform: Depressions Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: King County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 6, Sep 22, 2009 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/27/2010 01do Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT C Wetland Data sheets WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Enticknap Property City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 7/8/09 Applicant/Owner: City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-1 Investigator(s): Jessica Stone, Sacha Maxwell Section/Township/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)concave Slope% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum. Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X" No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal"? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No 1UMMAh(T OF HNUINUb- Attacn Site map Wltn Sampling point locations, transects, ana important ngures Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies all three mandatory wetland parameters. The data plot is classified as a PEM depressional wetland. 'Very dry summer VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot Size 6 m ) 1 2 3 4 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size 4.5 m ) 1 2 3 4 5 Herb Stratum (Plot Size 3 m ) 1 Agrostis gigantea 2 Equisetum arvense 3 Alopecurus pratensis 4 Festuca arundinacea 5 Vica sp. 6 Galium aparine 7 8 9 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size ) 1 2 Absolute Dominant %Cover Species? Total Total 60 15 10 5 2 2 94 Total Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrophytic vegetation criterion. Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: Status Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 Percent of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% Yes FAC Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL Species x 1 = FACW Species x 2 = FAC Species 90 x 3 = 270 FACU Species 4 x 4 = 16 UPL Species x 5 = Column Totals: 94 (A) 286 (B) no no no no FAC FAC FAC FACU Prevalence Index= B/A 3.0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: no FACU X Dominance Test is >50% X Prevalence Index is<3.0' Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting data in Remarks) Wetland Non -Vascular Plant Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatioh(Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mus be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No �ZTiHI Sampling Point: SP-1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % TypeLoc2 Texture Remarks 0-10 2.5Y 3/2 80 10YR 4/6 20 C PL silt loam dry, crumbly 10+ 2.5Y 3/2 50 10YR 4/6 30 C silt loam dry 2 5Y 8/1 — 20 D ' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand GraintLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (excepMLRA1) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) ' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: _ Depth: Yes X No Remarks: Soils dry, moistened for color determination. Data plot satisfies hydric soils criterion. I:1'/ 7 %7110ZH 1 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 4R (MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 413) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Drift Deposits (133) X Oxidized Rhizospheres along Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (_RR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) ERR A) Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Wetland Hydrology Present? Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) _ Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Yes X No Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) (Includes Capillary Fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Data collected during mid -July during dry period, additional hydrology likely present earlier in season based on existing vegetation and soils. Data plot satisfies hydrology criterion based on presence of a primary indicator (C3). Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Enticknap Property City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: 7/8/09 Applicant/Owner:City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-2 Investigator(s): Jessica Stone, Sacha Maxwell Section/Township/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)concave _ Slope% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X" No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal'? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map with sampling point locations, transects, ana importamt ngures 8 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies all three mandatory wetland criterion. The data plot is classified as a PFO depressional wetland. "Very dry sum VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: Tree Stratum %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species (Plot Size 6 m ) That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 1 Alnus rubra 40 yes FAC 2 Salix sitchensis 30 yes FACW Total Number of Dominant 3 Acer circinatum 10 no FAC Species Across All Strata: 7 4 80 Total Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (Plot Size 4.5 m ) 1 Spiraea doug/asii 20 yes FACW Prevalence Index Worksheet: 2 Rubus spectabilis 20 yes FAC 3 Ma/us fusca 15 yes FACW Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 4 Sambucus racemosa 10 no FACU OBL Species 40 x 1 = 40 5 FACW Species 65 x 2 = 130 65 Total FAC Species 110 x 3 = 330 Herb Stratum FACU Species 10 x 4 = 40 (Plot Size 3 m ) UPL Species x 5 = 1 Lysichiton americanum 40 yes OBL Column Totals: 225 , (A) 540 (B) 2 Equisetum arvense 20 yes FAC 3 Athyrium filix-femina 10 no FAC Prevalence Index= B/A 2.4 4 Stachys chamissonis 10 no NI Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 Ranunculus repens 10 rib FAC 6 X Dominance Test is >50% 7 X Prevalence Index is<3.0' 8 _ Morphological Adaptations 9 (Provide supporting data in Remarks) 10 Wetland Non -Vascular Plant _ 90 Total Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatioh(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size ) 1 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mus be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 2 Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrophytic vegetation criterion SOIL Sampling Point: SP-2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc' Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 muck saturated ' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand GraintLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (excepMLRA1) Other (Explain in Remarks) X Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, T Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth: Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Water -Stained Leaves (139) High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 4Q (MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 4B) X Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (61) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) X_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (135) _ Inundation Visible on l Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (-RR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Wetland Hydrology Present? Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Yes X No Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) to surface (Includes Capillary Fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrology criterion. Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Enticknap Property _ City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date 7/8/09 Applicant/Owner: City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-3 Investigator(s): Jessica Stone, Sacha Maxwell _ Sectionfrownship/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)concave Slope% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR Ay _ Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X' No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? ~ Are circumstances "Normal'? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No SUMMARY OF FINDINGS- Attach site map With sampling point locations, transects, ana important ngures 2 Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies all three mandatory wetland criterion. The data plot is classified as a PEM depressional wetland. "Very dry summer VtUt I A I IUN - use scientITic names or planm. Absolute Tree Stratum %Cover (Plot Size 6 m ) 1 Salix lucida 3 4 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size 4.5 m ) 1 2 3 4 5 Herb Stratum (Plot Size 3 m ) 1 Ranunculus repens 2 Scirpus microcarpus 3 Rumex crispus 4 Cirsium arvense 5 Equisetum arvense 6 7 8 9 10 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size ) 1 15 15 Total Total 50 30 5 5 1 91 Total 2 Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrophytic vegetation criterion. Dominant Species? yes Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: Status Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: NI Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: Percent of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC. VA 7 100% Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL Species 30 x 1 = 30 FACW Species 50 x 2 = 100 ,FAC Species 6 x 3 = 18 ,FACU Species 5 x 4 = 20 UPL Species x 5 = yes FACW Column Totals: 91 (A) 168 (B) yes OBL no FAC Prevalence Index= B/A 1.8 no FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% X Prevalence Index is<3.0' Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting data in Remarks) Wetland Non -Vascular Plantd Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatioh(Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mus be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No S011 Sampling Point: SP-3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks 0-18 10 YR 2/1 100 muck w/ silt saturated ' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grain'tLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) �X Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (excepMLRA1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) ' Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth: Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 46) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 413) X Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (62) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (65) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) ERR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) ERR A) Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Wetland Hydrology Present? Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 18 in Yes X No Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) to surface (Includes Capillary Fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrology criterion. Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Enticknap_Property City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: _ 7/8/09 Applicant/Owner: City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: SP-4 Investigator(s): Jessica Stone, Sacha Maxwell Section/Township/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)noncave Slope% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington _ NWI Classification: T Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X' No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal'? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X No ,UMMAKT OF HNUINUb- ArEacn size map Wlzn sampFing point locatlorlsr transecis, anu important rryures Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Yes No X Remarks: Data plot satisfies none of the three mandatory wetland criterion. The data plot is classified as upland. 'Very dry summer VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum %Cover Species? Status (Plot Size 6 m ) 1 2 3 4 Total Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot Size 4.5 m ) 1 2 3 4 5 _ Total Herb Stratum (Plot Size 3 m ) 1 Lolium perenne 88 yes FACU 2 Agrostis capillaris 5 no FAC 3 Festuca arundinacea 5 no FAC 4 Alopecuris pratensis 2 no FAC 5 6 7 8 9 10 100 Total Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size ) 1 2 Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: Data plot does not satisfy hydrophytic vegetation criterion. Dominance Test Worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 0 (Percent of Dominant Species That are OBL, FACW, or FAC Prevalence Index Worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL Species x 1 = FACW Species x 2 = FAC Species 12 x 3 = 36 FACU Species 88 x 4 = 352 UPL Species x 5 = Column Totals: 100 (A) 388 (B) Prevalence Index= B/A 3.9 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is<3.0' Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting data in Remarks) _ Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatioh(Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mus be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X [-Tell Sampling Point: SP-4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 4/2 98 7.5YR 4/6 2 C PL silty loam dry, crumbly ' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand GrairitLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (excepMLRA1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: Depth: Yes No X Remarks: Data plot does not satisfy hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 4E) (MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 413) Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (61) Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Drift Deposits (133) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (B5) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (_RR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) ERR A) Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Wetland Hydrology Present? Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Yes No X Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) (Includes Capillary Fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Data plot does not satisfy hydrology criterion. Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Bridges Property City/County: Federal Way/King Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: City of Federal Way State: Washington Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Perry Welch, Jessica Stone Section/Township/Range: Sec 32, T21 N, R04E Landform: depression Local Relief (concave, convex, none)concave Slope% Subregion(LRR): Northwest Forests and Coast (LRR A) _ Lat: 47 Long 122 Datum Soil Map Unit Name: King County Area, Washington NWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X' No (Explain in Remarks) Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are circumstances "Normal'? Are vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (Explain in remarks if needed)Yes X 7/8/09 SP-5 No 0 JVIVIIVIP%r%I Vr rll\LJ11917 J' MaW1.11 AILW IIr4p YYI all .7011 IF 119aj FV1114. IUUCI V11.7, aI a, lace. W, i111111p Vl all SUN- Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the sampled area within a wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies all three mandatory wetland parameters. The data plot is classified as a PEM depressional wetland VtGt I A I IUN - Use scientific names Oi plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet: Tree Stratum %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species (Plot Size 6 m ) That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 1 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: 3 4 Total Percent of Dominant Species Sapling/Shrub Stratum That are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (Plot Size 4.5 m ) 1 Prevalence Index Worksheet: 2 3 Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 4 OBL Species x 1 = 5 FACW Species 60 x 2 = 120 Total FAC Species 35 x 3 = 105 Herb Stratum FACU Species 5 x 4 = 20 l (Plot Size 3 m ) UPL Species x 5= 1 Holcus lanatus 30 yes FAC Column Totals: 100 (A) 245 (B) 2 Ranunculus repens 25 yes FACW 3 Juncus effusus 20 yes FACW Prevalence Index= B/A 2.5 4 Alopecurus pratensis 15 no FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5 P/antago major 5 no FACU 6 Trifolium repens 5 no FAC _ X Dominance Test is >50% 7 X Prevalence Index is<3.0' 8 _ Morphological Adaptationd 9 (Provide supporting data in Remarks) 10 _ Wetland Non -Vascular Plantg 100 Total Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatioh(Explain) Woody Vine Stratum (Plot Size ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mus 1 The present, unless disturbed or problematic. IHydrophytic Vegetation Present? 2 Total % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrophytic vegetation criterion SOIL Sampling Point: SP-5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loe Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 2/2 95 5YR 4/6 5 C PL silt loam moist 10-16 10YR 2/2 90 5YR 4/6 10 C PL silt loam moist ' Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grain'tLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR's, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (excepMLRA1) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Matrix (F3) 3 Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation Thick Dark Surface (Al2) X Redox Dark Surface (F6) and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) Restrictive Layer (if present): Hydric Soil Present? Type: _ Depth: Yes X No Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydric soils criterion. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) Water -Stained Leaves (139) X High Water Table (A2) (except MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 4P (MLRA 1, 2, 4A and 48) X Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (1311) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Saturation Visible on Aerial Drift Deposits (133) X Oxidized Rhizospheres along Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Living Roots (C3) Geomorphic Position (D2) Iron Deposits (135) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Surface Soil Cracks (136) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Inundation Visible on Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (_RR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Wetland Hydrology Present? Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches) Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 9 in Yes X No Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches) 8 in _ (Includes Capillary Fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Data plot satisfies hydrology criterion. Landau Associates, Inc Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ATTACHMENT D Wetland Rating Forms Wetland name: Wetland A WETLAND RATING FORM — WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2 — Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Name of wetland (if known): Wetland A Date of site visit: Aril 19, 2010 and May 12, 2010 Rated by: Jessica Stone and Perry Welch Trained by Ecology? Yes X No Date of training:6/18/2008 SEC: 32 TWNSHP: 21 N RNGE: 4E Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes No—X Map of wetland unit: Figure 2 Estimated size: 29 acres SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland: 1 II X III Category I = Score > 70 Category II = Score 51 - 69 Category III = Score 30 — 50 Category IV = Score < 30 Score for Water Quality Functions Score for Hydrologic Functions Score for Habitat Functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTCS of Wetland TOTAL Score for Functions 24 16 26 66 IV 1 1I_ Does not apply X (preliminaryj Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above") FWRC Cat 1 Summary of basic information about the wetland unit. Wetland Unit has Special Characteristics Estuarine Natural Heritage Wetland Bo Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Coastal Lagoon Interdunal None of the above Wetland HGM Class used for Rating De ressional X Riverine X Lake -fringe Slope Flats Freshwater Tidal Check if unit has multiple HGM classes present X Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the reuulntions reanrdina the enec'sal charartericticc fn„nd in the .aiatlanf] Check List for Wetlands that Need Additional Protection YES NO (in addition to the protection recommended for its category) SP1. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Cateaory 1 Natural Heritage Wetlands (see . 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW or the state? X SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or X in a local management plan as having special significance. Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 1 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington If the hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1-7 apply, and go to Question 8. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? NO - go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) ff your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. ff it is a Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were call estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Cate o I and II estuarine wetlands have changed see . 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. NO - go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland meet both of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any vegetation on the surface) where at least 20 acres (8ha) in size; At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 (2 m)? NO -go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake -fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual). The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these types of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep). NO - go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope 5. Does the entire wetland meet all of the following criteria? X The unit is in a valley or stream channel where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river. X The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years. NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time of the year. This means that any outlet, if present is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO -,go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the entire wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. No -go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit, classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM Classes within the wetland unit beingrated HGM Class to Use in Ratin + Riverine Riverine -Slope + Depressional Depressional -Slope + Lake -fringe Lake-frin e -Slope Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary De ressional l + Lake -fringe Depressional -Depression Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE under wetlands with special characteristics If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 2 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS — Indicators that wetland functions to improve water quality. D 1 Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: • Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) ........................................... points = 3 • Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted, permanently flowing outlet ........ points = 2 • Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet (permanently flowing) ....... points = I • Unit is a "flat" depression (Q.7 on key), or in the Flats class,'with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch ........................... points = 1 ff ditch is not ermanently flowing treat unit as "intermittent) owin ") Provide photo or drawing D 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or duff layer) is clay or organic (use NRCS definitions) YES points = 4 NO points = 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest Cowardin class): • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > = 95% of area ............................................... points = 5 • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > = 1/2 of area ................................................. points = 3 • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation > = 1/10 of area ............................................... points = 1 • Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation < 1/10 of area .................................................. points = 0 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes D 1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation: This is the area of the wetland that is ponded(or at least 2 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 years. • Area seasonally ponded is > 1/2 total area of wetland.......................................................... points = 4 • Area seasonally ponded is > 1/4 total area of wetland.......................................................... points = 2 • Area seasonally ponded is < 1/4 total area of wetland.......................................................... points = 0 Map of H dro eriods D2 Points (only 1 �Cort per box) (see p.38) 2 Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above IF 12 �. 7 Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p. 4 Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming f+•om several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. X Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft. of wetland A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging X Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft. of wetland Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen Other Multiplier YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is l ♦ TOTAL — Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from D1 by D2; then add score to table on p. I 24 HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS — Indicators that wetland unit functions to reduce floodina and scream degradation. D 3 Does the wetland have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.46) D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit • Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) ........................................... points = 4 • Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet ......... points = 2 • Unit is a "flat" depression (Q.7 on key) or in the Flats class, with permanent surface 0 outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch ........................... points = 1 (If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing') • Unit has an unconstricted or slightly constricted, surface outlet(permanently flowing) ....... points = 0 D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods. Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry). • Marks of ponding are 3 ft. or more above the surface or bottom of the outlet ....................... points = 7 • The wetland is a "headwater" wetland.................................................................................. points = 5 5 • Marks of ponding between 2 ft. to < 3 ft. from surface or bottom of outlet ........................... points = 5 • Marks are at least 0.5 ft. to < 2 ft. from surface or bottom of outlet ...................................... points = 3 • Wetland is flat (yes to Q.2 or Q.7 on key)but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points = 1 • Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft......................................................................................... points = 0 D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed: Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself • The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit .................................................... points = 5 3 • The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit ................................................. points = 3 • The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit .............. .............................. points = 0 • Entire unit is in the FLATS class......................................................................................... points = 5 Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above ... 8 D 4 Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep. 49) Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, Multiplier it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide ate, flap valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is from Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 3 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicalors of opporizenity apply. X Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems. X Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 2 I ♦ I TOTAL — Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D3 by D4; then add score to table on p. 11 16 1 Comments Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 4 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A 7]tese questionsrrppll' to t� rtlrtterls r��'irll IICi nsses._ - - Points ionly 1 seurr HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wetland functions to provide important habitat. per box) H 1 Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (see P. 72): Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin) - Si=e threshold for each class is 114 acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. Aquatic Bed X Emergent plants X Scrub/shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover) 4 X Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover) TV —the unit has a forested class check if. 5 herbaceous, X The forested class has 3 out of strata (canopy, sub -canopy, shrubs, moss/ground- cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon. .odd the number of vegetation types that rlual]fy. If you have: Map of Cowardin vegetation classes 4 structures or more....... points = 4 3 structures.. ................. points = 2 2 structures .................... points = 1 1 structure ..................., points = 0 H 1.2 Hydroperiods (see p.73): Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the ivetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the ivetland or 114 acre to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods). X Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points - 3 3 X Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 or more types present...... points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present ...................points = 1 X Saturated only 1 type present ....................points = 0 X Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland X Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake -fringe wetland ................. = 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland......... = 2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3 Richness of Plant Species (seep. 75): Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least ] 0 ftZ (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the si e threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle. If you counted: > 19 species ...................... points = 2 5 - 19 species .................... points = 1 2 List species below if you want to: < 5 species ........................ points = 0 H 1.4 Interspersion of Habitats (see p. 76): Decided from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation (described in H1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. Note: If you have 4 or more classes C:D (a) (:�4) or 3 vegetation classes and open water, the rating is None = 0 points Low — 1 point Moderate = 2 points always "high". Use map of Cowardin classes. 3 [riparian braided cnamtels] IiiR - H 1.5 Special Habitat Features (see p. 77): Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of point you put into the next column. X Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in. diameter and 6 ft. long) X Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland X Undercut banks are for at least 6.6 ft. (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least present 3.3 ft. (I in) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 f3. (10m) 5 X Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (�> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cur shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/hrown) X At least 1/4 acre of thin -stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg -laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants 20% 78 is an error. ]VOTE: The stated in early printings of the manual on page H 1 TOTAL Score - potential for providing habitat Add the points in the column above 17 Wetland Rating Form - western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 5 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A $ 2 Does the wetland have the onnortunity to provide habitat for many species? (only 1 score er box) H 2.1 Buffers (see P. 80): Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of ivetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the ivetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of "undisturbed". 100m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer (relatively undisturbed also means no grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) ............. points = 5 100m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50% circumference.................................................................................................... points = 4 50m (170 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 95% circumference.................................................................................................... points = 4 2 100m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference.................................................................................................... points = 3 50m (170 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for > 50% circumference.............................................................................................. points = 3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above: No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25m (80 ft) of wetland > 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK ......................... :........ points = 2 X No paved areas of buildings within 50m of wetland for > 50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing or lawns are OK................................................................... points = 2 Heavy grazing in buffer................................................................................................ points = 1 Vegetated buffers are < 2m wide (6.6 ft) for more than 95% circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland). ............................ points = 0 Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above.............................................................. points = 1 Arial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (see p. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft. wide, has at least a 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (Dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). YES = 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2 H. 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian 0 or upland) that is at least 50 ft. wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects t estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake - fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.3 H. 2.2.3 Is the wetland: • Within 5 mi (8km) of a brackish or salt water estuary OR • Within 3 miles of a large field or pasture (> 40 acres) OR YES = 1 point • Within 1 mile of a lake greater than 20 acres? NO = 0 points Comments: Wetland Rating Form —western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 6 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see p. 82): Which of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft. (100m) of the wetland? NOTE: the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. These are DFW definitions. Check ivith your local DFW biologist if there are any questions. X Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres) Cliffs: Greater than 7.6m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. Old -growth forests: (Old growth west of Cascade Crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings, with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or > 200 years of age. X Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth; 80 — 200 years old west of the Cascade Crest. Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where greases and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 — 2.Om (0.5 — 6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages. Oregon white Oak: Woodlands stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy 4 coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. X Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development. Estuary/Estuary-like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually semi -enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low -energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean -derived salts measure less than 0.5 ppt. during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats. = 4 points If wetland has 1 priority habit .. = 1 point If wetland has 2 priority habitats .............. = 3 points No habitats............................... = 0 points Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. (Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4). H 2.4 Wetland Landsc@Qe: Choose the one description of the landscape around the ivetland that best fits (seep. 84) • There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development .......... points = 5 • The wetland is Lake -fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake -fringe wetlands within 1/2 mile.....................................................................................................points = 5 • There are at least 3 other wetlands within 1/2 mile, BUT the connections between them are 3 disturbed. ... ... ... .. ....points = 3 • The wetland fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake -fringe wetlands within 1/2 mile ................................................... points _ • There is at least 1 wetland within 1/2 mile...........................................................................points = 2 • There are no wetlands within 1/2 mile.................................................................................. points = 0 H 2 TOTAL Score — opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1, H2.2, H2.3, H2.4 9 TOTAL for H 1 from page 8 17 ♦ Total Score for Habitat Functions Add the points for H 1 and H 2; then record the result on p. 1 26 Comments: Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 7 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. Wetland Type — Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the appropriate criteria are met. Ci Estuarine wetlands? (see p.86) Does the wetIand unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? The dominant water regime is tidal, Vegetated, and With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. YES = Go to SC Li i NO X SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC Cat. 1 332-30-151? YES = Category I NO = go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. I The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp,. are only species Cat. II that cover more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Category 1. Do not, however, exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. Dual At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft. buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed Rating or un-mowed grassland I/II The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. CZ Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p. 87) Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a natural heritage wetland? (This question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR.) S/T/R information from Appendix D or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site YES Contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2 NO X SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? Cat I YES = Category 1 NO X not a Heritage Wetland C3 Bogs (see p. 87) Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below to identify if the wetland is a bog. If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its function. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? YES = go to question 3 NO = go to question 2 2. Does the wetland have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond? YES = go to question 3 NO = is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? YES = Is a bog for purpose of rating NO = go to question 4 NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog. 4. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's spruce, or western white pine. WITH any of the species (or combination of species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? Cat. I YES = Category I NO = X Is not a bog for purpose of rating Wetland Rating Form —western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 8 of 9 Wetland name: Wetland A SC4 Forested Wetlands (seep. 90) Does the wetland have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its function. Old -growth forests: (west of Cascade Crest) Stands of at least two three species forming a multi -layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/acre (20 trees/hectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 inches (81 cm or more). NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two -hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR" so old -growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are 80 — 200 years old OR have an average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches (53 cm); crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old -growth. Cat. I YES = Category I NO = X not a forested wetland with special characteristics SC5 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (seep. 91) Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks. The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom.) YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO X not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1 Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing) and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant species (see list of invasive species on p. 74). At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft. buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat. I The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre (4350 square ft.) YES = Category I NO = Category II Cat. II SC6 lnterdnnal Wetlands (seep. 93) Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES = Go to SC 6.1 NO = X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. In practical terms that means the fallowing geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula -- lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-West -- lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis — lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is one acre or larger? YES = Category II NO = go to SC 6.2 Cat. II SC 6.2 Is the wetland between 0.1 and 1 acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES = Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics ♦ Choose the "highest" rating if wetland falls into several categories, and record on p. 1. NA If you answered NO for all types enter "Not Applicable" on p. I Comments: Wetland Rating Form — western Washington, version 2 (7/06) Page 9 of 9 - P }'d IV, � PO - 4 _ 40- Legend 0 Emergent Vegetation ® Scrub/Shrub Vegetation Forested Vegetation Data Source: King County GIS, Bing Maps Aerial Enticknap and Bridges Properties LANDAU Federal Way, Washington 14 ASSOCIATES J 250 500 'Ca e in Feet Map of Cowardin Figure Vegetation Classes D_ 1 t 4 .t jo.; S' V Legend ❑ Permanently Flooded [] Seasonally Flooded o 0 Saturated Only z5c 50c, Data Source: King County GIS, Bing Maps Aerial .Sca e in Feet Enticknap and Bridges Properties Figure LANDAU Federal Way, Washington Map of Hydroperiods14 �-2 ASSOCIATES ATTACHMENT E Site Photographs .4 ,,' Now i; t 1. Looking west at the emergent wetland in the southwest corner of the Enticknap Property (Parcel #3221049141) near SP-01. ; o •mot. -� ' ��$.�.- —�. �_ =k��� PXL _ L r k; 9 2. Soils and high water table in the emergent wetland area in the southwest ZZ corner of the Enticknap Property (Parcel #3221049141) near SP-01. Enticknap and Bridges 1ALANDAU Properties Selected Site Photographs ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington Figure E-1 . • err•. - ••+' ' . 1 W4, or .v d�tif -- �u_��� five•-. r . ,.� �� �_ Jf tS� 40 1 5. Looking south at seeps flowing into the wetland and the dirt road that runs N to S along the east edge of the Bridges Property (Parcel 92921049103). 6. Looking east at emergent wetland area and the west Bridges pond on the Bridges Property (Parcel #2921049118) near SP-05. Enticknap and Bridges Figure LANDAU Properties Selected Site PhotographsLA E-3 ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington 7. Looking southwest at the west Bridges pond on the Bridges Property (Parcel #2921049103). 8. Stream A running east to west between the Enticknap Property (Parcel 3221049141) and the Bridges Property (Parcel #2921049118). Enticknap and Bridges Figure LANDAU Properties Selected Site Photographs C^4 ASSOCIATES Federal Way, Washington G