Loading...
05-105889FILE AkCITY OF Federal Way December 19, 2005 Mr. Doug Garner Hammes Company 1325 4"' Avenue, Suite 1035 Seattle, WA 98101 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253)835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Re: File #05-105889-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY St. Francis Hospital ICU/PCU Expansion, 34515 9th Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Garner: Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development Review Committee (DRC) held December 8, 2005. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted. This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the City's Planning and Building Divisions and Public Works Department, and representatives from Lakehaven Utility District and Federal Way Fire Department. Some sections of the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) and relevant information handouts are enclosed with this letter. Please be advised, this letter does not represent all applicable codes. In preparing your formal application, please refer to the complete FWCC and other relevant codes for all additional requirements that may apply to your project. The key contact for your project is Deb Barker, 253-835-2642, deb.barker@cityoffederalway.com. For specific technical questions about your project, please contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the preapplication and permitting process can be referred to your key contact. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Proposed first and second floor expansion to the existing hospital as follows: 3,115 SF added to the first floor imaging and ER departments; 23,536 SF added to the second floor for an ICU/PCU excluding a 3,028 SF open courtyard, and a 1,542 SF second floor connector to the new ICU; proposed relocation of the existing loading dock and compactor, with a 450 SF addition to the central plant for an electrical room that houses switch gear related to a new generator and a new chiller. MAJOR ISSUES Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information submitted for preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the plans. These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project File U05-105889-00-PC Doc. I.D. 34075 Mr. Doug Ga%ier Page 2 December 19, 2005 and do not include the majority of the comments provided. The major issues section is only provided as a means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments made in the next section of this letter. Public Works Development Services Division The existing trash compactor and surrounding area are currently out of compliance with water quality standards, due to the compactor leaking liquid waste, which can then be discharged into the storm drainage system via a catch basin located in the adjacent truck loading/unloading area. See the Development Services Department comments below, for requirements to bring this area into compliance. • Building Division International Building Code (IBC) Section 1013.3, Common Path of Egress Travel DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions please contact the representative listed for that section. PLANNING DIVISION (Deb Barker, 253-835-2642, deb.barker(a),,citvoffederahvay.eom) 1. Land Use and Environmental Review — The zoning of the subject site is Office Park (OP). This zoning district permits a variety of uses, including hospital uses, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-831 (enclosed). The addition at the hospital will require Process III (Project Approval) and environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The applicant can choose to utilize a previous SEPA determination issued by the City if the recent ambulatory surgery center addressed the proposed ICU/PCU expansion. Otherwise, a new SEPA checklist must be submitted for the new project. Under SEPA review, the City will review the checklist and issue a determination. Following the determination, the decision will be mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site, as well as posted at official sites. Interested parties have 14 days to comment on the environmental threshold determination. A 14-day appeal period follows the comment period. Process III review is an administrative site plan review process, with a written decision by the Director of Community based on criteria listed under FWCC Section 22-395(b), which shall be issued after conclusion of the environmental process. The process III application must be prepared in accordance with the enclosed Development Application Submittal Requirements Checklist. A checklist and master land use application are enclosed along with applicable code sections. Building permits are issued following completion of the Process III review. Processing time for the concurrent SEPA and Process III review is approximately 120 review days following submittal of a complete application. This 120-day review period does not include any time during which the City has requested addition technical information required to review the application. Building permits can be issued after Process III approval is granted. File N05-105889-00-PC Doc I D 34075 Mr. Doug Garner Page 3 December 19, 2005 Fees — The proposal to develop the project requires the following 2006 fees: Process III: $2,129.00, plus $305.50 over 20,000 square feet SEPA Fee: $ 843.50 Total: $3,278.00 Process III fees vary with the size of the proposed building square footage, so please call to determine application fees if the proposed building sizes are modified during the design phase. Additional fees are associated with other City and district regulations, recording fees, engineering plan review, and other permits. Building permits must be obtained before any work commences. 3. Expedited Review —Expedited review for a variety of project components is available. Refer to the enclosed handout for submittal information, fees, and requirements. Please be advised that expedited review fees are in addition to the fees identified in section 2 above. 4. Nonconforming Development — FWCC Chapter 22, Article IV establishes when and under what circumstances nonconforming aspects of a use or development must be brought into conformance with the zoning code. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-334(3)(a), if an expansion of gross floor area of an existing building with single tenant or uses occurs through enlargement of the existing building footprint, then the applicant shall comply with all development regulations in effect at the time the expansion is proposed. Although there are many activities, the hospital building site' is considered a single tenant single use site. Therefore, with the addition of the ICU/PCU, all development regulations shall be met for the hospital building site as discussed below. Bulk and Dimensional Regulations — Front, side, and rear yard setbacks are maintained with this application. The required side yard is 20 feet; the slight expansion to the north does not intrude into this setback. An average building elevation height of 35 feet is allowed for hospital use in the OP zone. Average building elevation is measured from the finished grade, or existing grade prior to development, whichever is lower. Note 5 of FWCC Section 22-831 states that the maximum height of structures to 30 feet above average building elevation when within 100 feet of a residential zone. The property adjacent to a portion of the south property line is zoned residential. The formal application shall verify the distance of the ICU addition to the adjacent residential zone. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment must be screened from the street and adjacent properties per FWCC Section 22-960. The formal application must identify proposed screening methods for these features. 6. Parking — Parking is required at a case by case basis for the hospital use. An analysis of parking needs with the ICU/PCU addition must be provided with the process III application. The site has a recorded shared parking agreement, which should be considered in the parking needs analysis. 1 Hospital building is based on the Binding Site Plan. File N05-105889-00-PC Doc. LD. 34075 Mr. Doug Garner Page 4 December 19, 2005 7. Required Landscaping — A preliminary landscape plan, prepared by a liccnscd landscape architect in accordance with FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVII, "Landscaping," is required as part of the site plan submittal. The landscape plan must contain the following elements: a. Buffer Requirements — FWCC Section 22-1566(h)(1) requires 10 feet of Type III landscaping abutting access easements and public right-of-ways. Formal application shall verify that the perimeter landscaping requirements are met at the hospital site. Type III landscaping consists of trees, large shrubs, and groundcover that will provide visual separation, including a mixture of six foot tall evergreen trees and 1.5 inch caliper deciduous trees, interspersed with 24 inch tall shrubs and groundcover. Under the nonconformance analysis, the perimeter buffer areas surrounding the hospital site would be required to be upgraded to current standards. FWCC Section 22-1566(h)(2) requires Type I solid screen landscaping 15 feet in width adjacent to residential zoning districts along a portion of south property line. Type I landscaping is intended to provide a 100 percent solid screen from incompatible uses. This is in place in conjunction with previous hospital projects. b. Parking Lot Landscaping — Under the nonconformance criteria, Type IV landscaping must be provided in the interior of the parking lot within the BSP area of the hospital in accordance with FWCC Section 22-1567. Twenty-two square feet of interior parking lot landscaping must be provided for each parking stall for parking lots with 50 or more stalls. Parking lot landscaping shall generally be provided at the end of all parking rows and dispersed throughout the parking area in a manner to reduce visual impact of the parking lot. Pursuant to FWCC Section 2271567(c), the minimum width of planter islands at the end of 90-degree rows is six feet. To determine if this requirement is met, the formal site plan must identify the interior parking lot landscape calculations. c. Plant Species — The landscape plan shall state how it conforms to the drought tolerant plant species requirements of FWCC Section 22-1564(fl. d. Screening — Trash enclosures and loading docks shall be screened from abutting properties and rights -of -way by a 100 percent sight -obscuring fence or wall, and appropriate landscape screen. This applies to the new loading dock area. Landscape Modification - Opportunities to modify landscape requirements are available pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1570. 8. Design Guidelines — Projects subject to Process III review are subject to the provisions of FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines" (enclosed). Please review the enclosed design guidelines for all applicable design elements. Following are key design guidelines, along with staff comments. In cases of remodeling of existing developments, those guidelines that are reasonably related and applicable to the area of expansion or remodeling are applied to the project per FWCC Section 22- 1632. Generally, this proposal must address guidelines pertaining to facade treatment and pedestrian circulation f6r the existing building near the area of expansion and for all new development. The File #05-105889-00-PC Doc. I.D. 34075 Mr. Doug Garner Page 5 December 19, 2005 formal application must include a written design analysis based on FWCC requirements. I would be glad to meet with you to review community design guideline matters. a. Two of the four -facade modulation and screening standards under FWCC Section 22-1635 must be implemented for facades of new addition which are longer than 60 feet and visible from a public right-of-way or residential use or zoning district. In the case of the addition, the northern facade is visible from a future right-of-way, as defined in FWCC Section 22-1633(10). It is recommended that this facade incorporate modulation per FWCC Section 22-1638, and that the canopy treatment be extended to meet the intent of the code. b. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(c), building facade articulation must be provided for all facades visible from a right-of-way or public area, irrespective of item (c) above. The following concepts should be included to minimize building mass and scale: pitched roofs, cornices, material, and color variation. The proposed elevations depict material and color variations. These should be echoed within the balance of the hospital building. Project designers shall strive for overall site design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project (FWCC Section 22-1634[4]). The new facade is completely different from the balance of the building; it is recommended that the new materials be incorporated into existing portions of the building to address this requirement. d. Submittal of a colors and materials boards is required; and a colored street elevation sketch is helpful for staff in conducting the design review. 9. Wellhead Protection — The subject site is located in a wellhead protection zone, which is also known as a wellhead capture zone. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1372(1), adopted on November 16, 2004, projects that are located within Wellhead Capture Zone I may only be permitted in a wellhead protection area if the applicant can show that the proposed activity will not cause contamination to enter the aquifer. The formal application must include a completed Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas checklist. A copy of the code section and a handout on critical aquifer recharge and wellhead protection areas is enclosed. PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION (Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, kevin. eterson ei offederalwa .com Land Use Issues — Stormwater 1. The existing trash compactor and surrounding area are currently out of compliance with water quality standards, due to the compactor leaking liquid waste, which can then be discharged into the storm drainage system via a catch basin located in the adjacent truck loading/unloading area. In order to bring the trash compactor and surrounding area into compliance with water quality standards, the applicant must provide one of the following: a) Replace, or retro-fit, the existing trash compactor, so that it dose not leak liquid wastes that can then flow into the storm drainage system, OR File 05-105889-00-PC Doc. I.D. 34075 Mr. Doug Garner Page 6 December 19, 2005 b) Provide a containment curb around the area that the trash compactor rests upon, provide a roof over the entire trash compactor and curbed area, and submit a maintenance plan to address the containment area. The cover may need to meet additional design requirements of the planning and/or building department, OR c) Provide a containment curb around the area that the trash compactor rests upon, provide a roof over the entire trash compactor and curbed area, and plumb the contained area into the sanitary sewer system. Contact Lakehaven Utility District for sewer connection requirements. Please keep in mind that these requirements apply and must be implemented, whether the trash compactor is relocated as part of this project, or is left in its current location. 2. Show, on the plans, the means of addressing the trash compactor/water quality issue. PUBLIC WoRKs TRAFFIC DIVISION (Raid Tirhi, 253-835-2744, raid .tirhi a),citvoffederalwa .com FWCC Section 22-1475 authorizes the requirement of Transportation Impact Analyses to identify transportation impacts of a proposed development and identify appropriate mitigation measures. The applicant would be expected to contribute pro-rata shares towards Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects impacted by 10 or more peak hour trips. Mitigation improvements necessary beyond those identified in the TIP to meet the City's adopted level -of -service standard are required to be provided -by the applicant to meet concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act. 2-a. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (ITE) 7`" Edition, land use code 610 (Hospital), the project is estimated to generate 26 weekday evening peak hour trips. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by a traffic engineer licensed in the state of Washington is required to assess project impacts and determine mitigation measures. The traffic engineer should contact the Traffic Division for a scoping sheet in the initial stages of their study. Four final copies must be stamped and submitted to the City. 2-b. In order to save the applicant time and money in preparing the above TIA, staff completed a preliminary traffic mitigation analysis. Staff s analysis of the subject proposal indicates that the applicant would simply be required to pay his pro-rata share contribution toward the South 348`h Street improvement project listed as project ID No. 3 in the six -year TIP, (2006-2011). Staffs analysis resulted in a pro-rata share of $21,000. 3. In order for the application to be considered complete, the City must either receive four copies of a TIA report (stamped by the applicant's engineer) or a letter (signed by the applicant) proposing a ,$21,000 voluntary contribution towards the City's TIP project. BUILDING DIVISION (Scott Sproul, 253-835-2633, scott.sproul@cityoffederalway.com) International Building Code (IBC), 2003 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-40* File N05-105889-00-PC Doc. I.D. 34075 K1 Mr. Doug Garner Page 7 December 19, 2005 International Mechanical Code (1MC), 2003 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-42* Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2003 edition Washington State Amendments WAC 51-46 & WAC 51-47* International Fire Code (IFC) 2003 edition Washington State Amendments* National Electric Code (NEC), 2005 edition Accessibility Code, ICC/ANSI Al 17.1-2003 Washington State Energy Code, WAC 5 1 -11 Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code, WAC 51-13* *Current state amendments are dated July 1, 2004. ** As of January 1, 2002, the state amendments now require arc -fault interrupters for 15-20 amp branch circuits serving sleeping rooms in dwelling units (R-l's). Building Criteria Occupancy Classification: I-2 Type of Construction: I -A Floor Area: 24,783 Number of Stories: second story addition over existing story Fire Protection: Sprinkler system required Wind/Seismic: Basic wind speed 85 Mph, Exposure_, 25# Snow load, Seismic Zone D-1 A complete building permit application and commercial checklist (Additional copies of application and checklists may be obtained on our web site at www.cityoffederalway.com. Submit five sets of drawings and specifications. Specifications shall include: _ Soils report, X Structural calculations, X Energy calculations, X Ventilation calculations. NOTE: A Washington State Registered architect's stamp is required for additions/alterations (new or existing) of 4,000 gross floor area or greater unless specifically listed as an "exempt" structure per the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). Submit two copies with King County Health Department approval stamp for all projects that include food service facilities, septic systems, or other elements within the project that require health department approval. File #05-105889-00-PC Doc. I.D 34075 Mr. Doug Gainer Page 8 December 19, 2005 Energy code compliance worksheets arc required to be completed and included with your permit application. A wet stamp and signature is required on all sheets of plans and on the cover page of any calculations submitted. Federal Way reviews plans on a first in first out basis; however, there are some small projects with inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order. Review Timing The first comment letter can be expected within five to six weeks of submittal date. Re -check of plans will occur in one to three weeks after resubmittal. Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, size, and amount as the originally submitted plans. Revised/resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response, what changes have been. made from the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be forwarded from Community Development Services. Federal Way has an expedited review process. Information is available at our front counter. Other Permits & Inspections Separate permits may be required for electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire suppression systems, and signs. Applicants may apply for separate permits at any time prior to commencement of construction. When required, special inspections shall be performed by WABO approved agencies, or by agencies approved by the building official prior to permit issuance. Construction must be approved by all reviewing departments prior to final building division inspection All concerned departments (planning, public works, electrical, fire) must sign off before the Building Division can final the structure for occupancy. Building final must be approved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The City of Federal Way does not issue temporary Certificate of Occupancies. All construction projects may be required to have a pre -construction conference. If a pre -con meeting is required, all subs, the general or representative, the architect or representative, the engineer or representative, electrical contractor and any other interested party, should attend this meeting. Meetings will occur at the Building Department and will be scheduled by the inspector of record for the project. Site -Specific Requirements Provide information on the use of the courtyard. No access is detailed on the plans. The project description notes that two public elevator are to be installed. The location was not shown. I also strongly recommend that you start to coordinate with the Department of Labor and Industry regarding their requirements with elevators; so as to avoid conflict with building, mechanical/piping, and fire code requirements. The elevator machine rooms shall be provided with independent ventilation per IBC Section 3006.4. File N05-105889-00-PC Doc. I.D. 34075 Mr. Doug Garner Page 9 December 19, 2005 • Provide an egress lighting plan. The egress lighting plans shall be part of the building permit set. The electrical plans are a separate submittal and permit. • The structure shall have an importance classification of 1.5 per IBC Table 1604.5. • Per IBC Section 407.8, "Smoke Barriers," areas greater than 22,500 shall be divide into separate smoke barriers. • All existing exits shall not be impacted during construction. • In addition to normal vertical and lateral calculations, include an analysis by a Washington State licensed engineer addressing the differences in seismic stiffness between the existing hospital and the new addition. Construction documents must include details for the seismic joint between the existing hospital and the proposed addition. • Provide engineering detailing how the exiting structure will support the second floor addition. • Provide exit analysis for the new addition and also include the existing hospital. • Show how the second exit meets travel distance back through the existing hospital. The above referenced building related information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are not intended to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT (Brian Asbury, 253-835-2642, basbury@lakehaven.org) Water Although it appears no conflict should arise based on the plans submitted for the preapplication process, the applicant's design should consider and avoid any conflicts with existing Lakehaven water main and/or easement near the proposed area of construction (see enclosed map). Although not anticipated based on the plans submitted for the preapplication process, if additional hydrants or other fire protection system are required or indicated, a developer extensiont agreement will be required. Additional detail and/or design requirements can be obtained from Lakehaven by submitting a separate application to Lakehaven for either a pre -design meeting or a developer extension agreement. Lakehaven encourages the owner to apply for either of these processes early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. The owner will be required to complete and submit a Water Use Questionnaire (WUQ, copy enclosed). Information in the WUQ will be used by Lakehaven to determine specific backflow prevention requirements. Sewer The plans submitted for the preapplication process indicate a new trash enclosure area. Any liquid wastewater generated from this area will need to ultimately discharge to the sanitary sewer system; however, it is presumed the area will connect into the building's plumbing system on the northern side of the building. While still subject to Lakehaven's Sewer Use Rules regarding discharge from exterior trash areas (copy enclosed), the connection would not require a service connection permit from Lakehaven. File 1$05-105889-00-PC Doc. I.D. 34075 Mr. Doug Garner Page 10 December 19, 2005 * The owner will be required to complete and submit a Scwcr Usc Survey (SUS; copy enclosed). Information in the SUS will be used by Lakehaven to determine specific pretreatment requirements. General * For any proposed change or increase in usage beyond the level of the water and/or sewer system capacity previously purchased for the property(ies), Lakehaven researches prior system capacity charges paid, if any, and evaluates the subject property(ies) for the existence of any available credits and determination of a capacity `base level' for the subject property(ies). For any new or modified, non-residential connections sought after December 31, 2004, Lakehaven will assess additional Capital Facilities Charges (CFC) to property owners, where increased usage of the water and/or sewer systems beyond the property's base level, including increases attributable to usage associated with existing service(s), is indicated based on owner's submittal of estimated water consumption figures. Additionally, Lakehaven will levy, and the owner shall pay, a capacity rental charge for capacity utilized, based on water consumption records, during a usage monitoring period (not to exceed five years) above the level of capacity available following payment of any additional CFC. The owner has the option to make full purchase of any system capacity deficit at any time. Currently, system capacity is available for this property from system capacity charges previously assessed under Water Meter Application #13158 for 88 ERU for water and under Side Sewer Permit #14789 for 88 ERU for sewer. The most current 12-month period of water consumption indicates a usage level of 129 ERU for water and 130 ERU for sewer, indicating a current deficit (not including any proposed increase) of -41 ERU for water and -42 ERU for sewer. Lakehaven's current Capital Facilities Charges are $3,212/ERU for water and $2,702/ERU for sewer. It is anticipated that Lakehaven will implement an automated capacity rental charge affecting all non-residential service accounts in conjunction with and as part of standard, bi-monthly account billings. While Lakehaven's current `Fees an d Charges' Resolution does not preclude implementation of the automated rental charge at this time, staff estimates implementation in early 2007 due to projected, overall workload, and staff and resources available to prepare this process. All comments herein are valid for one year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and Lakehaven's current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s), or Lakehaven's regulations and policies, may affect the above comments accordingly. NOTE: Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of information provided. Facility locations and conditions are subject to field verification. All fees and charges are subject to change without notice. FEDERAL WAY FIRE DEPARTMENT (Greg Brozek, 253-946-7241, greg.brozek@federalwayfire.org) The Fire Marshal's Office requirements will be addressed during the plan review process. Prior to and during any demolition of the existing building and all new construction, provide the Fire Department and the Building Division with a plan detailing how the exiting from the existing facility will be maintained. If the File 405-105889-00-PC Doc. 1. D. 34075 Mr. Doug Garner Page 11 December 19, 2005 demolition and/or construction impacts existing automatic fire -extinguishing systems and/or automatic fire detection systems in the facility, the plan will need to address how those systems will be maintained during the demolition and/or construction. The plan is subject to review and approval by the Fire Department and the Building Division. CLOSING This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication meeting and is intended to assist you in preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your project. We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the City's review of the formal application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWCC Section 22-1657. As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will follow submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials submitted. Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter, please -examine -the complete FWCC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in the codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project. If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards the key project contact, Deb Barker, 253-835-2642. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Deb Barker Interim Senior Planner enc: Sign In Sheet FWCC Section 22-831 Master Land Use Application Process III Development Checklist SEPA Checklist Mailing Label Handout Expedited Review Handout FWCC Chapter 22, Article IV, "Nonconformance" c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Raid Tirhi, Traffic Analyst Scot Sproul, Acting Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department FWCC Chapter 22, Article VVII, "Landscape" FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines" FWCC Section 22-1372, "Wellhead Protection" Wellhead Protection Checklist Lakehaven Map Lakehaven Water Quality Checklist Lakehaven Sewer Use Survey File #05-105889-00-PC Doc. I.D. 34075 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (CDRC) Preapplication Conference Sign In Sheet St. Francis Hospital IC]/PCU Addition Preapplication 05-105889-00-PC December 8, 2005 Name 1. PaAAqlk� 3. ��&44�� 4. .1. { f (3�N SOYA 5. ��cQ-� ✓� Q V" 6. MIL z ����7z4J 11. Telephone Number �2- S3 —f 33 --z (19 C/z C,gL),((;&j #CJsll� ' bz,)l -)n a 573 935 a5--- 2b'10 v6 - 4 G 4 -4 zoo 2,53 _ g35- 2 -7 36 ,2S'3 3J (ZS 835 - Z� IN pmvw� mMpa1Y �.a►'4r+• Ors" a Barker - Fwd: Revised St Francis Hospital traffic comments _ _ _ Page 1 - -- - From: Deb Barker To: Doug Garner Date: 12/20/2005 4:35:48 PM Subject: Fwd: Revised St Francis Hospital traffic comments Doug - Apparently our Traffic Engineer did not have an opportunity to revise his calculations based on the amended addition size before the preapplication summary letter was issued. Please use the dollar figure in the attached WORD document for the traffic mitigation fee. Also, the attached worksheet provides his calculation basis for the mitigation fee. Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Deb Barker Associate Planner, City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-2642 deb.barker@cityoffederalway.com >>> Raid Tirhi 12/20/2005 1:37 PM >>> As discussed in the pre -application meeting, We indicated to the applicant that we will be revising our comments based on the revised building total square footage addition (including all floors). Please forward the following to the applicant. Thanks. Raid Tirhi, PE Senior Traffic Engineer City of Federal Way 33325 8 Avenue S P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (P) 253-835-2744 (F) 253-835-2709 Federal Way DATE: December 20, 2005 TO: Deb Barker FROM: Raid Tirhi MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ICU/PCU EXPANSION - (05-105889-00-PC) 34515 9TH AVE S, (REVISED) Following are the Traffic Division's revised comments for the most current proposal of 25,615 square feet addition instead of the 22,000 number as indicated in the application materials. 1. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1475 authorizes the requirement of Transportation Impact Analyses to identify transportation impacts of a proposed development and identify appropriate mitigation measures. The applicant would be expected to contribute pro-rata shares towards TIP projects impacted by 10 or more peak hour trips. Mitigation improvements necessary beyond those identified in the TIP to meet the City's adopted level -of -service standard are required to be provided by the applicant to meet concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act. 2-a. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (ITE) 7`4 Edition, land use code 610 [Hospital), the project is estimated to generate 26 weekday evening peak hour trips. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by a traffic engineer licensed in the state of Washington is required to assess project impacts and determine mitigation measures. The traffic engineer should contact the Traffic Division for a scoping sheet in the initial stages of their study. Four final copies must be stamped and submitted to the City. 2-b. In order to save the applicant time and money in preparing the above TIA, staff completed a preliminary traffic mitigation analysis. Staff s analysis of the subject proposal indicates that the applicant would simply be required to pay his pro-rata share contribution toward S 348th Street improvement project listed as project ID No. 3 in the 6-year Transportation Improvement plan (TIP), (2006-2011). Staffs analysis resulted in a pro-rata share of $21,000. Therefore, in order for the application to be considered complete, the City must either receive four copies of a TIA report (stamped by the applicant's engineer) or a letter (signed by the applicant) proposing a $23,600 voluntary contribution towards the City's TIP project. L:ICSDCIDOCSISAVE132790598039.DOC z Ix FPANCI 805P/ 7T11 L- -Y,�i yosPJ 7-f71- RATE - i . t 13 eM Pk )tp\- /00.5 SQ PROP0.5ED Z5,05 5c9 F'- New 33 , 60 ExlTl ti 6 - W 7,9/Pa (7) 12. AFFt G di, , / G �: Z2 m 2�� - z � ►, �ngnn�or�TA-r�� � Mho ✓E�l��i �1-r-� � �'�-i�J 5 3y6? sT VES F,})R (3306 3� 60rD - Hospital 6 p(I 7 ) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 7 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 505 Directional Distribution: 33% entering, 67% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.18 0.70 - 6.94 1.50 Data Plot and Equation 1,200 1,100 I 1,000 900 c W 800 ` Q F- 700 - t N 600 0) id Q 500 _ 400 X X 300 200 x y X 100 - T - 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.71(X) + 233.89 800 900 1000 ----- Average Rate R2 = 0.58 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1103 Institute of Transportation Engineers I-Pmlea Narth Park Develo ment on S 336- Street: Campus Pointe Offices, Mt- Rainier Bank, Lffe Care Center Office Federal Way, WA 1 _ Fs e 11. 2007 Without Project PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes lA Ave S/SW 330th St R �12 262 695 24 E-9 I .0' 6 sw 232-* `1 1 8—i 432 947 18 J 122 1 I, 767 Ist Way S/S 333rd St 5 *-144 9 869 34 f 0 125aau S 33 10--N �� 6 1,294 16 �r .. 20 rJ' / 99 8th Ave S/9th Ave S 56 299 1 104---'( ) 271 59 263 "�1 11,052 1st Way S!S 336th 5t 6th Ave 5/5 336th St �744 m � 12 12 21 556 411 '5 A— 53 55 4 36 F 1,161 j'48I J 4 i21 S di&A C S.azfirR S 78 - 0, 25 505 163 614-4• 6 I 62 s,s�a 60-x , oAx 4� • 9th Ave S/S 348th St �-137' 100 2 326 1, 746� h 868-a 79 11 24 - 6� Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC 5 -:E� REVISED Traffic Impact Study St 9th Ave S/5 336th St H 102 SR 99/S 336th St 164 160 252 -4-839 A r-- 87 � � 1 15 S33&nSr 309 1,775 128 <— 527 71 ]/ 1� 189 5.58 —Y 1 129 102 106 S .ZiEih 57 79 2.79"�/ R ` I 1 t,649 505 --W- 304 1,175 117 416 5,839 h St - 15S5R� �S 4' 85�hr St 126"3t 8 7 722 124 k274-- 8 ShR 5181 41 3 ,172 353 2631 205 3 428 161 Nose- NMbets In buyer ktl•hmA.mrsH,r rep�rsen}. ImCnCKOM PM Peak Hour EMft Traffic Volumes. (Not to Scaie) Fire ] I North Park 2007 Without Project Federal Way, WA PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Traffic Impact 56udy 99 Transportation Engineering NorthWest 28 November 3, 2005 gNy $ �M Pl 7A AdaC j S a � 3 � P r, $ 3 � � ={ � � � P � i.: A� � K, .1�Y f� i YS • � F � i 'i any xC Q �a���'�• yA. AV'A py� i{� % yL Y= i7 t. � f P � ��Y � 4 ¢ K E lip, Fy ti5Ar1 Y s 9� a r r 7 g � f $ ! w S C x _ = E 2 w�� �����$'"�8�;fig'"$� •. ..� �r Wa Raid Tirhi - Fwd: FW: Land Use SFa� �an�. Page From: Deb Barker To: Raid Tirhi Date: 12/20/2005 12:3725 PM Subject: Fwd: FW: Land Use SF >>> "Doug Gamer" <dgamer@hammesco.com> 12/12/2005 3:03 PM >>> Deb: FYI; do you need anything else re. the building areas? Doug Garner The Hammes Company Ph: 206/464-4200 Fax: 206/4644201 Cell: 206/321-3251 Email: daamerAharnmesco.com From: Bill Hutchinson Imaiito:Bill.Hutchinson@callison.comi Sent Monday, December 12, 2005 2:35 PM To: Doug Garner Cc: Chris Cooper Subject Land Use SF Doug, Here is an update on additional square footage for the land -use application SF Update 1� Floor 1 add added Sf = 3,115 sf Floor 2 = 23,536 -3,028 courtya d = 20,508 sf Raid Tirhi-Fwd. FW. Land Use SF Connecting Link = 1,542 sf Central Plant addition = 450 sf Total added SF = 25,615 sf Bill Hutchinson, AIA william.hutchinsonO,callison.com -cmailto.william.hutchinson2Pca_llison.com> CALLISON ARCHITECTURE, INC. 1420 FIFTH AVENUE #2400 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-2343 T 206 623 4646 F 206 623 4625 This email has been scanned by the Messagel-abs Email Security System. For more information please visit httpillwww.messagelabs.comle_ma l CITY OF �. Federal Way DATE: December 7, 2005 TO: Deb Barker FROM: Raid Tirhi MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL ICU/PCU EXPANSION - (05-105889-00-PC) 34515 9TH AVE S Following are the Traffic Division's comments for the subject proposal. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1475 authorizes the requirement of Transportation Impact Analyses to identify transportation impacts of a proposed development and identify appropriate mitigation measures. The applicant would be expected to contribute pro-rata shares towards TIP projects impacted by 10 or more peak hour trips. Mitigation improvements necessary beyond those identified in the TIP to meet the City's adopted level -of -service standard are required to be provided by the applicant to meet concurrency requirements of the Growth Management Act. 2-a. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation (ITE) 74" Edition, land use code 610 (Hospital), the project is estimated to generate 26 weekday evening peak hour trips. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by a traffic engineer licensed in the state of Washington is required to assess project impacts and determine mitigation measures. The traffic engineer should contact the Traffic Division for a scoping sheet in the initial stages of their study. Four final copies must be stamped and submitted to the City. 2-b. In order to save the applicant time and money in preparing the above TIA, staff completed a preliminary traffic mitigation analysis. Staff s analysis of the subject proposal indicates that the applicant would simply be required to pay his pro-rata share contribution toward S 348 h Street improvement project listed as project ID No. 3 in the 6-year Transportation Improvement plan (TIP), (2006-2011). Staffs analysis resulted in a pro-rata share of $21,000. Therefore, in order for the application to be considered complete, the City must either receive four copies of a TIA report (stamped by the applicant's engineer) or a letter (signed by the applicant) proposing a $21,000 voluntary contribution towards the City's TIP project. L:\CSDC\DOCS\SAVE\32790598039.DOC FILE CITY OF �. Federal November 18, 2005 Doug Garner Hammes Company 1325 4tt, Avenue, Suite 1035 Seattle, WA 98101 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal wa y. com RE: File #05-105889-00-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE St. Francis Hospital ICU/PCU Expansion Dear Mr. Garner: The above -referenced proposal has been assigned to me as project planner. At this time, the application and preliminary site plan have been routed to the members of the Development Review Committee. A meeting with the project applicant and Development Review Committee has been scheduled as follows: Thursday, December 8, 2005 -- 9:00 AM Hylebos Conference Room City Hall, 2,d Floor 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 We look forward to meeting with you. Let me know if you will have more than five people attending the preapplication meeting so we can make arrangements for a larger room. This is the only notice sent out, so please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend the meeting. Please call me at 253-835-2642 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Deb Barker Interim Senior Planner 05-105889 Doc 1 D. 34074 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 17, 2005 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department FROM: Deb Barker FOR DRCMTG. ON. December 1, 2005 - Internal December 8, 2005, 9:00 - with applicant FILE NUMBER(s): 05-105889-00-PC RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: St. Francis Hospital ICU/PCU Expanion Preapplication PROJECT ADDRESS: 34515 - 9TH Avenue South ZONING DISTRICT: OP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed 22,000 square foot addition and remodel of ICU/PCU & emergency departments. PROJECT CONTACT: Hammes Company Doug Garner 1325 4 h Avenue Suite 1035 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 464-4200 �•1 MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION RECEIVED DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF __''� 33325 8`h Avenue South NOV 16 2005 PO Box 9718 Federal WayFederal Way WA 98063-9718 G(� of FEDERAL WAY 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 BUILDING DEK. www.citvoffederalwgy.com APPLICATION No(s) 0 5 — ! O 1C Date Project Name :Si-. F-0 A F[ "fir L ; C c> /PC L_-) Z3�`= C_ sc (��4 ,.� � [ a ►�[ Property Address/Location 3 S r C 3 Parcel Number(s) 7SD 4 S/ D O Z p Project Description A Mt!2 c t i o L,� 0 E tit 01.) 1 G J � 'l-_'C (T 1k 134, u` C--x(5 G—mac—' eft a G PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination 5 Preapplication Conference Process I (Director=s Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information o P Zoning Designation aF Comprehensive Plan Designation Ct GO r-t Value of Existing Improvements b Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): T_ - Z_ Occupancy Type �L - !✓ter_ c.r SPter � K ;cyConstruction Type Applicant Name: Pov G GRTt rrJ� Address: L3 ZS 4 City/State: 5 , L-3 54, Zip:_ o( Phone:- :Zob / 464- 4Z.cICD Fax: _ 2-06 . 6,4 - 4 Zol Email: - a vsp-r-�Vl _ Lo r 1 Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: t4cA «[ SYsr-c—r-r Address: - l7 17 So v <<4 `T` City/State:- T'ACC cA, c.0 A. Zip: 9 S 4 o.S- 4 5r 33 Phone: 2-S 314 2 6 -410[ Fax: -- _ Email: - Signature: Bulletin #003 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:Ulandouts\Master Land Use Application h 7- v FRFlIUGO5f' IYL25PI Tt 1_ Hose/ T/9L LVC - 6 /v J ROE /.1 £3 i'M Pk W SQ Fr zz s -2& -rRt p5 5A)TWt06- = 9 7R/P5 6V EX/T)A-) (5 /7 7-"/Ps T,R,4FF-I C- -T, C� zo)l TR�i}NSPO�TA"T/Any �MprROJ M�AJT e�L�JL f Tl �� • )-/�Oc7K7T-- 14 AW 3 - 5 3v9 sr C) F,)IR 5 -Uj)! = I9 (3306 f /6 f' �fj35pj Ouv 1.1 2G (�M Hospital (610) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Number of Studies: 7 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 505 Directional Distribution: 33% entering, 67% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.18 0.70 - 6.94 1.50 Data Plot and Equation 1,200 1,100 ......... ...... ..... •..... ...... ........ 1,000 ......-----•---............ 900 .. . . ...... ..... . 800 700 . ...... ... .. .......•.......,.. ............ 600 500 400 300 200 100 100 200 300 X Actual Data Points 400 500 600 700 800 X =1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.71(X) + 233.89 900 1000 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.58 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1103 Institute of Transportation Engineers 3-Pro ect North Park Development on S 336d' Street: CamP us Pointe Offices, Mt_ Rainier Rank, Life Care Center Office Federal Way, WA 11. 2007 Without 1st Ave S/SW 330th St I' �12 262 695 24.- E-9 �J or- 6 ii wa3sYn 232--'f f 10 8� 432 947 18 y rwy 122-� ect PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Ist Way S/S 333rd St 5 ,144 9 869 34 _ F 0 �12 s333rvs7 19-� t P 0'> 6 1,294 16 99 8th Ave S/9th Ave S 56 299 J 104--'( ) f ` ¢ 27159 263 � I,U52 + 1 St Way S/S 336th St w 6th Ave S/S 336th St *-- 744 1 21 556 411 „ F 53 jr- 481 55 4 36 E- 1,161 21 ssr 101 -- f �/ I 533M 5r 10 y/ 78 -� 25 505 163 614--1• 6 1 62 099 98 60 1986 4 -x 9th Ave S/S. 348th St y 137 r � 26 1,7 {c I 1 _I 1 8 79 1 GX 3,372 10 Transportation Engineering NorthWest, LLC 99 REVISED Traffic Impact Study 9th Ave S/S 336th St i � 102 SR 99/S 336th St 164 160 252 E- 839 Al Ac 87 115 smft si 309 1,775 128 E- 527 71 R 1 t 189 558 -l. 129 102 106 79� 279-� 2,649 505-� 304 1,175 117 416--�k s,a3v h St SR 99/S 348th St 4 D. 126 722 124 1,589 A,— = SR 161 /SR 18/S 348th 5 s R'413 I55 � 1,204 18 353 263 1 �2 5� /c 11 83Z S 3t8tle & SR Ii 151 - t * 371 553 428 7.07N 274—* 161 I Not-. Numbers in I-- whaN -M_ _pre$M Me VftVon PM Peak hour E4terfn Traffic Vo4mKs. fW (0 Scale) Figure 12 North Park 2007 Without Project Federal Way, WA PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Traffic Impact Study Transportation Engineering NorthWest 28 November 3, 2005 v�iH v}gzwx wsN a�m�n.+w N C v N �n d a y $ x 5 nw�F maMg .�W . aggr 49 s tt g3p�;i P i y 884 gM �zat o 9 M 3 9 s I Q 4 9 y �IJ @ J4$ I I J IJ rE - n 3 8s _ »c Ss r i�s s" a spI $ S »GYo .�.. m52'Sb'miSgi �8V'��li if a'���ii Zi i57S tSC Hospital (610) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 14 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 292 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 17.57 11.40 - 67.52 11.93 Data Plot and Equation 30,000 w c 20,000 W Q H 10,000 0 1— 0 100 200 300 X Actual Data Points . ._.. .... I -! I . I - - r. ..r—,. ��--- _ -,I . 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Fitted Curve Equation: T=10.01(X) + 2209.31 1300 1400 Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.84 Trip Generation,7th Edition 1101 Institute of Transportation Engineers EXISTING OXYGEN TANK CENTRAL PLANT SERVICE YARD NEW GENERATOR NEW CHILLER ❑B Gfut�' ( ff ��\ EXISTING UNDERGRNDI i - -- -- � FUEL TANK` AREA EXISTING EXISTING DRAIN N COOLING TOWER COOLING TOWER /��❑�'�� RIF I I NEW ELECTRICY.LARE� 0q\� :�- ROOM ,DRAIN 4- E •48 '01i TOP OF WALL 42" Y �•__ DECK LEVELER ABOVE GRADE LANDSCAPING DECK LEVELER .� - i - LINE OF NEW METAL CANOPY 17 V NEW - CONCRETE SLAB - --+ ` ` " - -r-- — - ��i� f � `•ram J _ t — r; , . � I � I � �' J I .._.._.. _��• jj Ij c�x�r-rye r- ' -:I EXISTING CONCRETE •`�,�,: } I' pl �'•F +. r / ' LANDING TO REMAIN ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL ICU/PCU BED EXPANSION Preliminary REVISED LOADING DOCK AND CENTRAL PLANT EXPANSION 12-12-05 �I '9 l