Loading...
17-105643Bob Ferguson ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Transportation & Public Construction Division PO Box 40113 • Olympia WA 98504-0113 • (360) 753-6126 July 23, 2019 Mark Orthmann Zach Lell City Attorney's Office Ogden Murphy Wallace City of Federal Way 901 5th Avenue, Suite 3500 33325 8tb Avenue S, 2nd Floor Seattle, WA 98164 Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: SEPA DNS Appeal—DaVita Healthcare Office Park **ER 408 Communication** Dear Mark and Zach: Thank you for arranging for WSDOT, the City, and DaVita to meet and discuss the issues raised in WSDOT's appeal on July 16. At that meeting, WSDOT understood that the City would facilitate further collaboration between WSDOT, the City's planning and public works staff, TenW (the consulting firm that prepared the Traffic Impact Analyses (TIAs) for the development for the Weyerhaeuser campus), and IRG (the developer of the remaining Weyerhaeuser parcels, including "Warehouse B" and "Greenline Business Park"). WSDOT also understood that the City would share its concurrency analysis at the PM peak hour for these parcels and for "Warehouse A," which is also set for development within the Weyerhauser campus. WSDOT views this collaboration as critically important in maintaining a healthy community partnership with the City. It is WSDOT's hope that by sharing this information and engaging in an ongoing dialogue about the potential traffic impacts of this development, WSDOT can properly assess whether this development will cause any impacts to the state highway system, including Interstate 5. WSDOT will be reaching out to City staff directly to further discuss the traffic studies at issue for the Weyerhaeuser campus. In light of this, and based on the information the City has shared with WSDOT concerning the City's review of traffic impacts for the Weyerhaeuser campus historically and DaVita's traffic analysis specifically, WSDOT has agreed to dismiss its appeal of the City's Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the DaVita application. A copy of our motion to dismiss is enclosed with this letter. ©acf:r-, is il, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTO July 23, 2019 Page 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your professionalism in this matter. Sincerely, MATT HUOT Assistant Attorney General Matt.Huotatg.wa.izov (360) 586-0641 MDH:BL Enclosure cc: Ann Gygi, counsel for DaVita Amit Ranade, counsel for DaVita Mike Cotten, WSDOT, NW Region Administrator Ramin Pazooki, WSDOT, NW Region Development Services and Utilities Manager Case File A ,l [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER g FOR THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 9 In Re: No. 10 Appeal by Washington State Department MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF of Transportation (WSDOT) of the VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 11 Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS) for DaVita Healthcare Office Park (File 12 Number 17-105643-S.E.) 13 14 The Appellant, State of Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT), by and 15 through its attorneys of record hereby voluntarily withdraws its appeal of the Determination of 16 Nonsignificance issued by the City of Federal Way on May 3, 2019. This voluntary withdrawal 17 shall be with prejudice and without costs to any party. 18 DATED this day of July 2019. 19 ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General 20 21 22 MATTHEW D. HUOT, WSBA #40606 Assistant Attorney General 23 Attorneys for Appellant, State of Washington Department of Transportation 24 (360) 586-0641 Matth.Huot@atg.wa.gov 25 MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON 26 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Transportation & Public Construction Division 7141 Cleanwater Drive SW P.O. Box 40113 Olympia, WA 98504-0113 (360) 753-6126 Facsimile: (360) 586-6847 t 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Brenda Larson, an employee of the Transportation and Public Construction Division of the Office of the Attorney General of Washington, certify that on this day true copies of the Motion for an Order of Voluntary Dismissal was served on the following parties as indicated below: OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER City of Federal Way 90210th Street Tacoma WA 98405 Brian Davis City of Federal Way Community Development 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way City Clerk's Office 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 Mark D. Orthmann, Deputy City Attorney, for City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue S, 2nd floor Federal Way, WA 98003 Ann Gygi Amit Ranade Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson P.S. 999 Third Avenue, Suite 4600 Seattle WA 98104 BB: United States Mail B United States Mail OEmail (briars. d avis@cityoffederalway . com) : BE United States Mail : BE United States Mail B: United States Mail I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated this kS"�day of July 2019 at Olympia, Washington. BRENDA LARSON Legal Assistant MOTION FOR AN ORDER OF 2 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASH NGTON VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Transportation & Public Construction Division 7141 Cleanwater Drive SW P.O. Box 40113 Olympia, WA 98504-0113 (360) 753-6126 Facsimile: (360) 586-6847 1 0 N@N 2 # v LS J� 3 JUlV 0 7 2019 [J 4 CCity Clerks office °f Federal wa 6 7 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER g FOR THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 9 In Re: No. 10 Appeal by Washington State Department NOTICE OF APPEAL of Transportation (WSDOT) of the 11 Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS) for DaVita Healthcare Office Park (File 12 Number 17-105643-S.E.) 13 14 The State of Washington, by and through its Department of Transportation, appeals the 15 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) of the City of Federal Way (City). This appeal is made 16 pursuant to FWRC 14.10.060. 17 I. IDENTITY OF APPELLANT 18 The appellant is the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). It is an 19 executive agency of the State of Washington entrusted with the construction, operation, and 20 maintenance of the state highway system. WSDOT submitted written comments or information 21 to the City on the proposed action and, as an interested party, has standing to appeal the DNS. 22 23 II. DECISION BEING APPEALED 24 WSDOT appeals the DNS issued by the City on May 3, 2019. A copy of the DNS is 25 attached to this appeal. NOTICE OF APPEAL I ATTORNEY GFAKER L OF WASUNGTON 26 Transportation & Public Construction Division 7141 Cleanwater Drive SW P.O. Box 40113 Olympia, WA 98504-0113 (360) 753-6126 Facsimile: (360) 586-6847 1 III. STATEMENT OF FACTS 2 3.1 DaVita and its agent, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC (Applicant), submitted a 3 development application for a project referred to as "DaVita Healthcare Office Park" (Federal 4 Way File: 17-105643-SE) (the "DaVita project''). 5 3.2 The DaVita project proposes to construct a 161,280 square foot office building 6 with 211 adjacent parking spaces on parcel 2154650110 (5.22 acres), as well as an additional 7 parking lot with 470 parking spaces on parcels 2154650060 and 2154650090) (6.32 acres) on 8 the former Weyerhaeuser Campus in the vicinity of 32nd Avenue South and South 323rd Street, 9 within Federal Way city limits. 10 3.3 Applicants submitted, among other supporting records, an "updated" Traffic 11 Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed DaVita Single -Tenant Office —Federal Way, WA, 12 prepared by Transportation Engineering NorthWest (TENW) on November 9, 2018 (the "DaVita 13 TIA"). 14 3.4 In addition to the DaVita project, three other project proposals for development 15 of the Weyerhaeuser campus have either been approved or are pending review with the City: 16 "Warehouse A, Warehouse B, and Greenline. Separate TIAs were prepared for each project." 17 3.5 In response to the DaVita DNS, WSDOT provided the following comments to 18 the City on May 17, 2019: 19 3.5.1 The DaVita TIA did not analyze cumulative traffic impacts of the four 20 projects on the Interstate 5 (I-5) and State Route (SR) 18 ramp terminal intersections 21 adjacent to the Weyerhaeuser campus. 22 3.5.2 The DaVita TIA only analyzed the I-5 and S. 320th Street interchanges. 23 It did not analyze the SR 18 and Weyerhaeuser Way interchange, even though it is 24 reasonable to expect traffic impacts to that interchange as a result of the DaVita project. 25 3.5.3 The DaVita TIA identifies 171 new trips assigned to the ramp -terminal NOTICE OF APPEAL 2 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON 26 Transportation & Public Construction Division 7141 Cleanwater Drive SW P-0. Box 40113 Olympia, WA 98504-0113 (360) 753-6126 Facsimile: (360) 586-6847 1 intersection of southbound I-5/S.320th Street and 187 new trips assigned to the 2 northbound intersection during the morning (AM) peak hour. These new trips place a 3 burden on critical state highway infrastructure and exceed WSDOT's requirements for 4 mitigation based on generated vehicular trips. 5 3.5.4 The DaVita TIA did not perform an afternoon (PM) peak hour analysis of 6 the I-5/S. 320th Street interchanges. Consequently, it is unknown whether the 7 DaVita project will have PM peak hour impacts to these interchanges, which are g currently heavily congested that time. 9 IV. GROUNDS FOR REVIEW 10 4.1 In making its threshold determination on nonsignificance, the City erred in the 11 following ways: 12 4.1.1 The City failed to analyze the cumulative traffic impacts of the 13 Warehouse A, Warehouse B, Greenline, and DaVita projects. 14 4.1.2 The City failed to analyze traffic impacts from the DaVita project to the 15 SR 18 and Weyerhauser Way interchange. 16 4.1.3 The City failed to require or otherwise consider mitigation measures for 17 traffic impacts to the I-5/S. 320th Street ramp -terminal intersections during the AM peak 18 hour. 19 4.1.4 The City failed to analyze traffic impacts to the I-5/S. 320th Street 20 interchanges during the PM peak hour. 21 4.1.5 As a result, the City lacks the information needed to determine that these 22 traffic impacts would not be significant and that the DaVita project would not require an 23 environmental impact statement. 24 25 NOTICE OF APPEAL 3 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON 26 Transportation & Public Construction Division 7141 Cleanwater Drive SW Y.O. Box 40113 Olympia, WA 98504-0113 (360) 753-6126 Facsimile: (360) 586-6847 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 V. CONCLUSION 5.1 WSDOT respectfully requests that the Hearing Examiner enter an order that: a) requires the City to analyze cumulative traffic impacts of the four Weyerhaeuser projects; b) requires the City to analyze traffic impacts to the SR 18 and Weyerhaeuser Way interchange and perform a PM peak hour analysis of the I-5/S.320th Street interchanges; and c) requires the City to identify mitigation measures for traffic impacts to WSDOT highway infrastructure, including the I-5/S.320th Street interchanges and condition any city approvals for the DaVita project on the inclusion of those traffic mitigation measures that will reduce the severity of the traffic impacts below the level of significance. 5.2 In the alternative, WSDOT requests that the Hearing Examiner order that and Environmental Impact Statement be prepared that analyzes these impacts and identifies mitigation measures. DATED this day of June 2019. ROBERT W.FERGUSON Attorney General NOTICE OF APPEAL MATTHEW D. HUOT, WSBA #40606 Assistant Attorney General Attorneys for Appellant, State of Washington Department of Transportation (360) 586-0641 Matth.Huot@atg.wa.gov 4 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Transportation & Public Construction Division 7141 Cleanwater Drive SW P.O. Box 40113 Olympia, WA 98504-0113 (360) 753-6126 Facsimile: (360) 586-6847 CITY or Federal Way Department of Community Development STAFF EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DaVita Healthcare Office Park Federal Way File: 17-105643-SE Related Files: 17-105642-UP, 17-104985-CN, 17-105644-SM NoTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced below may not be enclosed with all copies of this evaluation. Documents are available for review; contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, Department of Community Development, 33325 8ah Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003, 253-835-2634, or stacey.we ish{rr�cityofFederaiway.com. I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION Construction of a 57.5-foot tall, 161,280 square -foot office building with 211 parking spaces, and associated site work, on a parcel totaling 5.22 acres (parcel 2154650110). A parking lot with 470 parking spaces and associated site work is proposed on two adjacent parcels located to the north totaling 6.32 acres (parcels 2154650060 and 2154650090) and is part of the proposed action (Exhibit A). II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: DaVita Healthcare Office Park Applicant: DaVita Arthur Richey 6245 South Victor Avenue Tulsa, OK 74136 Phone: (918) 810-37000 Applicant's Agent: Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 33400 8 h Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: (253) 838-6113 Location: Next to the traffic circle at 32nd Avenue South and South 323'd Street, Federal Way, WA (Exhibit B) Parcels: 215465-0060, -0090, & -0110 Zoning: Office Park (OP-1) Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Page 1 of 5 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 17-105643-00-SE 1 Doc, I.D. 79086 Comp Plan Designation: Office Park The following information was submitted as part of the application for review. The most recent versions of documents are listed below, as some documents have been revised and resubmitted. 1. Forest Practices Application, received April 23, 2019 2. Summary of Changes -Process III with SEPA and Construction Plan Details DaVita Healthcare Office Park, ESM Consulting Engineers, February 28, 2019 3. Updated Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed DaVita Single -Tenant Office —Federal Way, WA, TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest, November 9, 2018 4. Email from Brian Gilles, Gilles Consulting, to Savanna Nagorski, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, October 30, 2018 5. Evaluation of Trees at DaVita Lots A, B, &C, At the Intersection of South 323rd Street & 32nd Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003, Gilles Consulting, revised October 30, 2018 6. Technical Review Comments Response, ESM Consulting Engineers, September 11, 2018 7. Environmental Checklist, signed by Savanna Nagorski, September 12, 2018 8. Revised Statement of Architectural Design Intent, McGranahan Architects, revised August 31, 2018 9. FWRC 19.65.100.0 and CZA-Use Process III Decisional Criteria, ESM Consulting Engineers, September 11, 2018 10. Existing Conditions Report, Talasaea Consultants, Inc., revised September 6, 2018 11. Geotechnical Engineering Services Revised Report, GeoEngineers, September 7, 2018 12. Davita Healthcare Compass Site Photos Reference map and photos, received September 12, 2018 13. DaVita Healthcare Preliminary Technical Information Report, ESM Consulting Engineers LLC, September 7, 2018 14. Exterior Elevations Sheets A1.01 & A1.02, McGranahan Architects, received September 12, 2018 15. Site Plan Sheet ST-01; Existing Conditions Sheet EX-01; Legend Sheet LG-01; Preliminary Utility Plan Sheet SD-01, Preliminary Landscape Plan Sheets LA-01; Landscape Details and Notes Sheet LA-02; Clearing and Grading Plan Sheet GR-01; Site Cross Sections Sheet GR- 02; and Tree/Vegetation Retention Plan Sheet TR-01, ESM Consulting Engineers LLC, received September 12, 2018 16. Master Land Use Application, received November 22, 2017 17. Process III Land Use Application with SEPA, ESM Consulting Engineers LLC, November 22, 2017 18. 2017 Traffic Concurrency Review Application, received October 16, 2017 19. Preapplication Conference Summary, City of Federal Way, September 18, 2017 Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Page 2 of 5 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 17-105643-00-SE I Doc. I.D. 79086 20. Title Report Guarantee No. NCS-879600-WA1, First American Title Insurance Company, November 9, 2017 21. Title Report Guarantee No. NCS-881568-WA1, First American Title Insurance Company, November 22, 2017 22. Water Certificate of Availability, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, October 27, 2017 23. Sewer Certificate of Availability, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, October 27, 2017 24. Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance, East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan, Application No. SEP98-0039, issued February 9, 1999 25. Letter from Patrick Malley, Quadrant, to Cary Roe, City of Federal Way, February 8, 2000 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements of the environmental checklist (Exhibit C) and a response to each with: 1. Whether city staff concurs with the applicant's response to the checklist item, or 2. City staff s additional comments or clarification to each checklist item. A. BACKGROUND The project development application was submitted November 22, 2017, with a subsequent submittal made on December 8, 2017. It was determined to be a complete application on December 20, 2017. Subsequent submittals were made on September 12, 2018, October 31, 2018, November 9, 2018, February 28, 2019, and April 23, 2019. Following are staffs comments on the September 12, 2018 checklist: 1-6. Concur with the checklist. A future building expansion from 161,280 square feet to 200,000 square feet on the east side of the proposed building is noted in the resubmitted documents. According to the applicant's submittal, "should the future expansion to 200,000 square feet occur, 667 parking spaces will be required and provided in the proposed extension area of the parking lot." The proposed extension area of the parking lot is not labelled or shown in the submittal. The current project proposes 681 parking spaces which exceeds the requirement for the 161,280 square foot building. The building expansion outline as indicated on the site plan would occur in an area that will be developed with parking and landscaping for the current building. The building expansion would alter the built site and it has not been demonstrated how it would comply with requirements, in particular those for parking and landscaping. No design for the expansion has been submitted, and according to the applicant, the timing for the expansion is not known. The expansion is conceptual and as a result, is not included in this SEPA determination. Land use and environmental application submittals and building permit review of the expansion are required at the time the expansion is proposed. 8. See the list above in Section II for additional environmental information that has been prepared related to the proposal. In addition, the proposal was reviewed for conformity with the previous environmental determination on the property (SEP98-0039) and for overall compliance with SEPA. SEP98-0039 was for the East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Page 3 of 5 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 17-105643-00-SE I Doc, I.D. 79086 and the mitigation measures in SEP98-0039 had to be met either prior to approval of the Binding Site Plan, prior to recording of the Binding Site Plan, or prior to occupancy of the first building. The current DaVita proposal is not the first building to be developed within the Binding Site Plan. 9. Concur with the checklist. 10. For clarification, the Developer Extension Agreement and Side Sewer Permit is administered by Lakehaven Water & Sewer District and the Washington State Department of Ecology administers the NPDES Construction Stormwater Discharge Permit, not the City of Federal Way. 11. Concur with checklist. 12. Concur with checklist B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth --Concur with the checklist. 2. Air --Concur with the checklist. 3. Water a. Surface --Concur with the checklist. b. Ground --Concur with the checklist. C. Water Runoff 1-3. Concur with the checklist. d. Final review of the stormwater quality and detention will occur in conjunction with the final engineering plan review. Compliance with local, state, and federal standards will sufficiently mitigate stormwater impacts from the project. 4. Plants --Concur with the checklist. 5. Animals --Concur with the checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources --Concur with the checklist. 7. Environmental Health --Concur with the checklist. 8. Land and Shoreline Use --Concur with the checklist. 9. Housing --Concur with the checklist. 10. Aesthetics --Concur with the checklist. 11. Light and Glare --Concur with the checklist. Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Page 4 of 5 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 17-105643-00-SE / Doc. I.D. 79086 12. Recreation --Concur with the checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. The Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation has determined that the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters would qualify for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. b-d. Concur with checklist. 14. Transportation a-b. Concur with the checklist. C. See response to A(7), above regarding the future building expansion parking. d-g. Concur with the checklist. h. The underlying parcels were developed under the East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan (BSP). As part of the Parcel 1 BSP development approval, traffic impacts identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by The Transpo Group were appropriately mitigated. Additional mitigation would be required if the total square feet or PM trips from the Parcel 1 BSP exceeds the approved threshold. 15. Public Services --Concur with the checklist. 16. Utilities --Concur with the checklist. IV. CONCLUSION The proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The city reserves the right to review any future revisions or alterations to the site, or to the proposal, to determine the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the project. Exhibit A — Reduced Scale Site Plan Exhibit B — Vicinity Map Exhibit C — Environmental Checklist Prepared by: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh (253-835-2634, stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com) Date: April 30, 2019 Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Page 5 of 5 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 17-105643-00-SE /Doc.1.D_ 79086 NYId 2DS 0 ire -lV2H V-LlAVC3 Fau- - i Rmu,., ZY. QN1 'SHEIN-LUVed RHVOH-L Nuvd A01=1=10 sndvyvQ ISV3 .1 d <; O'S Z—f.— Hi i EXHIBIT B Vicinity Map 3201h'EA N 4k CITY 10';:tSP OF Federal Way Department of Community Development Services 81h Avenue South IRE S U 8 i ,� I TTE D Federal way, WA 98003-63 5 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 SEP 12 2018 wym-cilvoffederaltvay.cvm Cf i Y Or FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY �EPVaoP6meu, SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Prnpose of checklirp. Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information -is also belpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization, or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts, or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. In rtructionr for applicants JLdW This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use `soot applicable" of "does not apply" only when you can explain why* does not apply and not when the answer is unlmown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies and/or reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process, as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts ofyourptoposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. In rtnrctions for Lead Agencies• Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal, and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first, but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use ofchecklistfornonproj clprposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans, and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A andB, plus the st I•Ai. SI If;'I I - I'( )It itiONIIItc NI'.(:I ' �1(AU NS (part D� Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for nonprojects) questions in Part B (Environmental Elements) that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposaL September 2018 Page 1 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park A. BACI<GROUND hell 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: h�gel l "DaVita Healthcare Office Park" 2. Name of applicant: �� Arthur Richey % Davta Healthcare Partners, Inc./Team Genesis 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: hel 6245 S Victor Ave Tulsa, OK 74136 918-810-3700 4. Date checklist prepared: hj e1 November 22, 2017 Revised September 11, 2018 5. Agency requesting checklist: jhLe-1PJ City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): VLe-1pJ Land Use Process Approval Winter 2018 Ground Work and Construction Spring 2019 Completion Summer 2020 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. huge � Yes, there are two phases for this proposal. The first phase includes a full site buildout and a 160,000 SF building. The second phase will come at an undetermined time in the future to include an expansion of the proposed building, up to 200,000 SF. Additionally, a separate Land Use Process will be required and applied for with the City of Federal Way to address the off -site improvements necessaryfor this project an the existing DaVita property. This will be parallel with the current application as fire access proposed through the connection of the two properties. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. BIdW • Existing Conditions Report by Talasaea, 11/1712017 • Tree In by Gilles Consulting,11/1712017 • Geotechnical Report by GeoEngineers,11113/17 Preliminary technical information report addressing relevance of the 9 Core and 5 Special Requirements of 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual by ESM,1112212017 September 2018 Page 2 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Puk • Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance, East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan (Application No. SEP98-0039) from 1999; • Traffic impact Analysis Memorandum by TenW, 11121117 c Revised Existing Conditions Report prepared by Tolasaea, September 2018; e Revised Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) and Level 1 Downstream Storm Drainage Analysis prepared by ESM, September 2018; Revised Tree Assessment prepared by Brian Gilles of Gilles Consulting, September 2018; Revised Geotechnical Report prepared byGeoEngineers, September2019 o Revised Traffic impact Analysis prepared by TenW, available September or October 2018 Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Jelpl The City is currently reviewing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to improve and align S 324th to Weyerhaeuser Way S. This could affect ROW improvements at the south boundary of the subject property. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. hovel j All with the City of Federal Way: - Commercial Grade & Fill, SEPA Threshold Determination, Process Ili Land Use Review. - At Building: Building Permit, Lokehaven Utility District Developer Extension Agreement and Side Sewer Permit. - Boundary Line Adjustment to remove lot lines. —A BLA and LLE were recorded in April 2018 on both subject properties (BLA — rec. no. 20180424900005, LLE rec. no. 20180424000481), - Land Use Process I for off -site parking lot improvements; - NPDES Construction Stormwater Discharge Permit; - Forest Practices Class IV -General Application. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) LetW Construction of approximately 161,280 square feet of new office space for DaVita Healthcare and 681 parking spaces. This project is subject to the FWCC 1994 code and the Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre Annexation Zoning Agreement (CZA) of 1994. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. M-PI The site is located to the east of the adjacent, existing DaVita Business Office at 32275 3211d Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98001. A site plan has been included with the Land Use Application package. See the Existing Conditions, Sheet EX-01, of the plan set for updated legal descriptions and property lines. Proposed Development: 11.5 acres; King County parcel numbers 215465-0060, -0090, -0110, -0120; within S/T/R: NW 15-21-04 and NE 16-21-04 September 2018 Page 3 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park B. ENVMONMENTAL ELEMENTS hh 1. Earth a. General description of the site 9&-I l (underline/circle one): Flay rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? BLelpl ±15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. DLelp The SCS and the 1973 NRCS mapped Alderwood gravelly sandy loan (Ag8), derived from glacial till, for the property and vicinity. The USGS has Vashon-age Glacial Till (Qvt) mapped as native geologic materials. Weathered (medium dense) glacial till and unweathered (dense to very dense) glacial till, with generally silty sand with gravel or silty gravel with sand was discovered by GeoResources — refer to the revised Geotechnical Report, September 202 8, for more information. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. hel None e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. h� elpl The purpose of the site fill and grade activities is to provide an adequate and level surface for the building and parking space. There will be approximately 26,750 cubic yards of cut and 13,500 cubic yards of fill for a net cut quantity of 13,250 cubic yards. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. elelg� Erosion could occur as a result of clearing and construction, particularly if earthwork is completed during periods of rainfall. TESC measures will be implemented as approved by the City prior to construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 75% of the net site area will be covered with impervious surfaces, including parking and the proposed building. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ghelw The applicant will institute an erosion control plan to be used during earthwork and construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance wheo the project is conipletcO If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. he September 2018 Page 4 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park Some heavy machinery exhaust and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment could result during the development phase of this project. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. DLelpl None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: �h� All construction equipment will be in proper working order and regulated for emissions by the manufacturer and local emissions laws. Vehicles entering and leaving the site will also be regulated for emissions by state and local emissions laws. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to keep any dust from impacting surrounding air quality. 3. Water a. Surface Water Dielp 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? Ifyes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. RLq1W There are wetlands on adjacent properties and nearby the site. However, the critical area and their buffers do not encroach onto the subject property. Please refer to the Existing Conditions Report provided by Talasoea. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. DigX11 No work over, in, or adjacent to is proposed in the existing nearby wetlands. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. helg� None proposed. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. DLelpj Not proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note the location on the site plan. DLdpl No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. heel Not proposed. b. Ground Water September 2015 Page 5 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses, and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hf elp] Not proposed. 2) Describe waste material that will he discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (far example: domestic sewage; industrial containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to he served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. VhLe-1pJ Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwatet): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. � 1 Stormwater runoff from the site will be treated for enhanced water quality in filter vaults, prior to being discharged to the existing stormwater system that continues to the existing regional detention and water quality pond. The existing pond provides additional basic water quality treatment for both existing and proposed pollution generating areas. No additional water quality monitoring is required by City, County, or State codes. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Lhael Suspended soils and hydrocarbons associated with automobiles may potentially enter the ground waters via storm water. This would be mitigated with water quality facilities installed per City of Federal Way standards. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No - discharge will occur at the natural location. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The project contractors, users, and personnel will utilize onsite Best Management Practices. Attached drainage plans show runoff from the developed site will be directed to the existing regional water quality and detention pond. 4. Plants DLe1W *Please refer to the Existing Conditions report provided by Talasaea a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: DLOW X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X_shrubs _ X —grass September 2018 Page 6 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Paazk b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? lielpi Native and non-native trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants will be removed during site construction. Please refer to sheet TR-01 and the revised Tree Assessment provided by Gilles Consulting, September 201S. for clarification. a List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. iel No native threatened or endangered plant species were observed or are known to occur on or immediately adjacent to the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. hielpI The proposal is to retain 2535 of significant trees on site, whether through tree retention or replacement equal to retention rates as required by the City of Federal Way/ FWCC 1994. A 25' landscaping section along the perimeter of the properties fronting a street are Included in the plans, with X high dense, site obscuring vegetation along the proposed parking lot, using plants -approved by the City of Federal Way. A 5' wide Type 111 Visual Screen landscaping is used along property lines adjacent to other properties. Refer to sheets TR-01, LA-W and LA-02 for more information. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, English ivy, English holly, creeping buttercup, Scot's broom 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site, or ate known to be on or near the site. Examples include: &eW birds: hawk, songbirds, common crow other: mammals: rabbits, squirrels fish: no fish inhabit the site b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. gjdW No listed species are known to occur on or near the Site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The entire region is known to be part of the Pacific Flyway. The Pacific Flyway includes Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and the Rocky Mountains and Pacific coast regions of Canada, the United States and Mexico; and south to where the Pacific Flyway becomes blended with other flyways in Central and South America. However, the site is not known to be used by migratoryfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. V1g1pJ The proposed landscaping and vegetation retention for the project will help enhance natural features and provide small wildlife habitat, such as for birds or insects. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or neat the site. Bullfrog, large -mouthed bass in North Lake. September 2018 Page 7 of 14 D2Vit2 Healthcare Office Park 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. ielW Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the project. Natural gas maybe used to satisfy incidental energy needs. Solar power may be used if available. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. jh� No, the proposed building height is at 5Z5'ABE This proposed height is allowed by increasing building setbacks from property lines. No existing development utilizes solar energy in proximity to which the shadow cast from the building has any effect. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. DLelpl NG-Oa fi lulled wit d usL- ppp4catien. Energy conservation will be addressed in the building permit documents. Approximately 5% of the parking stalls will be reserved for electrical vehicles and provide EV charging infrastructure. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. DLeIW None known. 1) Describe any !mown or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. Litter from trespassers is the only known contamination associated with this site. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located vdtbin the project area and in the vicinity. None known. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the projeces development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None known. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Emergency medical and 911 services may be required, along with typical fire and police services. Special services are not anticipated. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. September 2018 Page 8 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? ham) The primary source of noise near the project site is from vehicular traffic along Weyerhaeuser Way S, S 320th St and Interstate-5. It is not anticipated to materially impact the proposed project in any way. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. j e1W Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during the site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and always in compliance with the City of Federal Way noise regulations. Long-term impacts would be those vehicular trips associated with office space. Noise generated fiom the proposed office operations is not expected to impact surrounding properties. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: ftI4 Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. el The site is currently vacant. The site is bordered to the east with Storm pond (south); to the west is the primary/original DaVita Healthcare office facilities; to the north are mixed uses; and to the east is mixed uses. The proposal is an approved use for the zone and will not affect current land uses of nearby properties. b. Has the project site been used as wonting farmlands or worlung forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? &elpl No 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how. No impact. c. Describe any structures on the site. &elpj None. The site is currently vacant. September 2018 Page 9 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? D1e1W No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Vjelpl Office Park 1; OP-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? hel Office Park g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? DLelpl Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Bidpi No critical areas are on the site. Please refer to the Existing Conditions Report provided by Talasaea. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Bidpi Approximately 800-900 people will work at the completed project (post the phase 2 extension to 200,000 SF) with varying shifts throughout the days and weeks. Approximately 640-720 people will work in the completed project within the 161,280 SF building proposed for phase 1. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? VLe1W None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. DWpJ Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. tLe-1PI the project will be developed in accordance with applicable City of Federal Way development and land use codes to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Development Regulations. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any. None proposed. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. DLe1W None. September 2018 Page 10 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing, el None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. h�_ el4 Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? hj glW The tallest height at the top of the proposed building parapet proposed is 5Z5' ABE grade. The principal exterior building materials will include an aluminum window system with low emissivity glazing, prefinished metal panels, painted concrete and/or brick veneer. Please see Building Elevations and Design Intent provided by McGranahan. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views will be altered by this development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. hiel p Significant trees will be retained to the extent possible. Newly landscaped areas will be planted to screen areas and blend in with the existing adjacent development 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? el W Parking lot lighting would occur dusk through dawn at completed project. Minimal glare would occur from sunlight reflected off parked cars. Additionally, the headlights of traveling vehicles would occur any time of day. Some glare may be produced by the reflective glass windows during the early morning and late afternoon periods of sunshine but would be retained on site. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Djdpl No, not with the landscaping and setbacks included in the plan. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. The principal exterior building materials will help to reduce light and glare impacts. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? VLellpj September 2018 Page 11 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park Private pedestrian trails meander throughout the adjacent Weyerhaeuser property. It is the intent of DaVita to provide pedestrian connectivity through the proposed campus (with connection to the existing DaVita office building). The proposal includes non -motorized paths around campus for employees and visitors of the site, and a pedestrian easement on the eastern edge of the southern property for connection to the future S 3241h Street b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Vl elpl No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any, %_J_RJ Pedestrian access through campus is proposed for the project site. Other measures are not proposed. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or neat the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. Ihel Adjacent to the south of the site, the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center was constructed in 1978 and the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters was constructed in 1969, which makes it 47 years old. Pursuant to CFR 36, Chapter 1, subsection 60.4 criteria for evaluation, the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters building may be eligible. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials ❑r old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. Jhg4l No known landmarks or evidence have been observed on or near the site. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Jhel The methods used to assess the potential impacts included GIS data analysis and WISAARD GIS data review. d Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. If any such historic or cultural evidence is encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work will be halted in the area and a state -approved archeologist/historian will be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Didpj September 2018 Page 12 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park S 32016 St and Weyerhaeuser Way serve the East Campus Corporate Park 1. Through streets, S 323rd St and 32"d Ave S will provide direct access to the proposed developed site in this project. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? VLe1W Yes, the site is serviced by Pierce County Transit route 501 with 1 stop along the property frontage on Weyerhaeuser Way S. Metro Transit route 181 serves along S 320th St. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? DIdW The fin of project will result in a total of approxii-lately 691 outdoor parking stalls, with 470 stalls provided on the north parking lot and 211 stalls proposed on the southern building property. This allows for the minimum count of 667 parking stalls to be provided should the future building expansion occur. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities, not including drire7�,ays? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). hf�lnl Right-of-way dedication of 9' along the property frontages on 32nd Ave S and S 323rd Street will be made to the City of Federal Way. The existing roundabout will be modified to accommodate adequate sight distance and pedestrian crossings at the north and east splitter islands. A 20' pedestrian path easement located along the east property line of the southern lot will be used for future pedestrian connectivity. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. DIdW Not expected. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed projector proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Jkelpj The new office space of about 161,280 square feet is anticipated to generate 1,879 new daily trips. INS estimated that the proposed development will create 290 new AM pear hour trips and 281 new PM peak hour trips. The trip generation estimates are based on the iTE Trip Generation Manual, 9d' Edition, ITE Code Single Tenant Office Bldg 715. See the Revised TiA provided by Ten W for more information. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. Not expected. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. Jelo Traffic impacts (off -site) associated with this project were considered and appropriately mitigated under the Threshold Determination for the East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan (BSP). Traffic impact fees will be paid accordingly. September 2018 Page 13 of 14 DaVita Heakhcaxe Office Park 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. help The completed office facilities would result in a slight, increased need for public services to include fire protection, police protection, and health care. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Diellpl The increased demand will be offset by impact fees, levies, and taxes required to be paid by the applicant as part of this development. Also the proposal has been designed in a manner that will provide adequate access for fire, medic, and police vehicles. Police protection needs will be minimized by the employment of private security monitoring systems. Business and property taxes generated by the proposed office space should be sufficient to offset any increases in public service needs. 16. Utilities Underline/circle utilities currently available at the site: VLelpj electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service telephone, sanitarTsewer septic system, other The above listed utilities are either available on -site or will be extended as necessary to serve the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. ftlpl Lakehaven Utility District will provide water and sewer connection. Puget Sound Energy will supply electricity and gas Telephone: Century Link, Verizon, Comcost Fire Protection: South King Fire & Rescue C. SIGNATURE HELP The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. ,•i 1 �-x j Signature: ,�J� i+ / Printed Name of Signee:fQL�' Position and Agency/Organization: Date Submitted: lZ September 2018 Page 14 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park Washington State .� Department of Transportation May 17, 2019 Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Subject: DaVita Healthcare Office Park MDNS File No. 17-105643-SE Dear Ms. Welsh: Northwest Region Sno-King Local Agency and Development Services 15700 Dayton Ave. N P.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133 This letter is in response to the DaVita Healthcare Office Park MDNS that we received from the City. The proposed project includes the development of up to 57.5- foot tall, 161,280 sq. ft. office building with a parking lot with 470 parking spaces on currently vacant parcels. The project site is located between I-5 and Weyerhaeuser Way S, south of S 3201h St. Vehicle access is proposed at two locations; one via the intersection of S 320`h' St and 32" d Ave S just east of 1-5 and the other along Weyerhaeuser Way S via S 323`d St. Our comments are as follows. 1. There are four project proposals within the Federal Way campus (former Weyerhaeuser campus): Warehouse A, Warehouse B, DaVita, and Greenline. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) for DaVita incorporated new trips generated by the proposed office and parking but did not include traffic volumes generated by the Warehouse A, Warehouse B, or Greenline proposals. Separate TIAs have been submitted for three of the projects (Greenline has not yet been formally submitted to WSDOT for review but is currently available on the city's website), so it is assumed the projects will be developed within a similar timeframe. The four projects are within the same campus, so the cumulative traffic generated will have an impact on the I-5 and SR 18 ramp terminal intersections adjacent to the campus. The four project proposals must be analyzed together to fully assess the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of all four developments to WSDOT's facilities and their function. 2. The DaVita TIA only analyzed the I-5 and S 3201h St interchange. It is expected that some trips will access the proposed development site from the SR 18 and Weyerhaeuser Way interchange. The scope of the analysis must be expanded to include the SR 18 and Weyerhaeuser Way interchange area. Afth Washington State Sno-KNorthwest Region .. Department of Transportation 115700fDaytong rn Ave. N and Development Services P.O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133 In the AM peak hour, the TIA identifies 171 new trips assigned to the ramp- tenninal intersection of southbound I-5 and S 320" St, while 187 new trips are assigned to the ramp-tenninal intersection of northbound I-5 and S 320"' St. Both of these intersections exceed WSDOT's requirement for mitigation based on generated vehicular trips (Developer Services Manual). Likewise, the SR 18 and Weyerhaeuser Way interchange area must be analyzed to determine if vehicle trips exceed the mitigation threshold. 4. A PM peak hour analysis of the I-5 ramp terminal intersections was not performed as part of the TIA. In the PM peak hour, the ramp terminal intersection and vicinity is heavily congested, with long delays and queues. Added trips in the PM peak would further degrade intersection operations. Without analysis to quantify the level of added PM peak hour impacts, it is assumed that there will be additional impacts at both the northbound and southbound 1-5 ramp tenninal intersections resultant from the development. Likewise, the SR 18 and Weyerhaeuser Way interchange area must be analyzed to determine if vehicle trips exceed the mitigation threshold. Both I-5 intersections have limited storage capacity for turning traffic to respective on -ramps. Additional westbound traffic generated from the development will increase blockage of access to the short left turn lane for the southbound ramp terminal. A PM peak hour analysis of the cumulative projects is required to evaluate system deficiencies and identify improvements as mitigation. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (206) 440-4710 or pazookrtr�_uwsdot.wa.go OR Randy Frantz of my Local Agency and Development Services section at 206-440-4715 or via e-mail at frantzr@wsdot.wa.gov Sincerely. Rainin Pazooki 3 0� Utilities and Developer Services Manager cc: Mike Cotten Mark Leth Cameron Kukes Robin Mayhew Project File Stacey Welsh From: Stacey Welsh Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 2:30 PM To: Mark Orthmann Subject: FW: Davita TIA From: Palisoc, Feiixberto {mailto:PaIIsoFa wsdot.wa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12:10 PM To: Stacey Welsh Subject: Davita TIA Hi, Stacey. Below are our comments on the TIA. The proposed development is a 161,280 square feet single -tenant office building area. The project is located west of Weyerhaeuser Way and south of the 1-5/S 3201h St exit in Federal Way. Parking will be provided on the north and south side of S 323nd St. Vehicles can access the site by full access driveways on 32"d Ave S and S 323rd St and by the existing 32"d Ave/S 323rd St roundabout. The TIA provides trip generation, distribution, assignment and LOS for the proposed development. 1. There are four project proposals within the Federal Way campus (former Weyerhaeuser campus): Warehouse A, Warehouse B, DaVita, and Greenline. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) for DaVita incorporated new trips generated for the office building, but did not include traffic volume generated b' the Warehouse A, Warehouse B, and Greenline proposals. The projects should be analyzed together. Separate TIAs have been submitted for Warehouse A, Warehouse B, and Davita projects, so it is assumed the projects will be developed within a similar timeframe. The projects are within the same campus, so the cumulative traffic generated will have an impact on the 1-5 and S 320th St southbound and northbound ramp terminal intersections adjacent to the campus. To determine the impact and level of mitigation, the project proposals should be analyzed together. The ramp capacity at S 320th St from southbound 1-5 and to northbound 1-5 should also be analyzed. 2. In the AM peak hour, the DaVita project is anticipated to add 62 new trips to the intersection of the southbound 1-5 off -ramp and S 3201h St. The project exceeds the vehicular trip threshold in the Developer Services Manual for determining whether a highway improvement should be requested. The PM peak hour was not include in the analysis. The cumulative impact of these developments will affect the operation of the transportation network and the interstate. As mitigation for the cumulative impacts from the Weyerhaeuser campus developments, WSDOT requests that the PM peak hour be analyzed to determine impacts. Felix 201902475 - Federal Way City - SEPA Administration Page 1 of 2 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Register SEPA and NEPA documents posted by the Department of Ecology since 2000 Search (../../) / 201902475 - Federal Way City of 201902475 - Federal Way City of Lead Agency Federal Way City of File # 17-105643-SE, 17-105642-UP, 17-104985-CN, 17-105644-SM Contact Stacey Welsh (253) 835-2634 stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com (mailto:stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com) County KING Region NW SEPA # 201902475 Document Type DNS Date Issued 05/03/2019 Comments Due https:Happs.ecology.wa.gov/separ/Main/SEPA/Record.aspx?SEPANumber=201902475 5/30/2019 201902475 - Federal Way City - SEPA Administration Page 2 of 2 05/17/2019 Proposal Description DaVita Healthcare Office Park; Construction of a 57.5-foot tall, 161,280 square -foot office building with 211 parking spaces and associated site work, on a parcel totaling 5.22 acres (parcel 2154650110). A parking lot with 470 parking spaces and associated site work is proposed on two adjacent parcels located to the north totaling 6.32 acres (parcels 2154650060 and 2154650090) and is part of the proposed action. Related Record Notes Location Address: Nest to the traffic circle at 32nd Ave S and S 323rd St Federal Way, WA Parcel: 215465-0060, 215465-0060, 215465-0090, 215465-0110 Applicant DaVita, Arthur Richey Applicant Contact 6245 S Victor Ave Tulsa, OK 74136 Documents L DaVita DNS and Checklist.pdf (Document/DocumentOpenHandler.ashx?Documentld=64097) (6 MB) Please email SEPA Help (mailto:sepahelp@ecy.wa.gov) with any updates, problems, or questions about SEPA Register. © 2019 Washington State Department of Ecology - Shorelands Environmental Assistance Program https:Happs.ecology.wa.gov/separ/Main/SEPA/Record.aspx?SEPANumber=201902475 5/30/2019 Olympic 'mow PIPE LINE COMPANY City of Federal Way Attn: Tina Piety 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 tina. iet cit offederalwa .com (253) 835-2601 Olympic Pipe Line Company LLC Right of Way Department COO Southwest 39'` Street Suite 275 Renton, WA 98057 RE: City of Federal Way 32A Ave S and S 323rd St. Federal Way, WA 98003 BP File No. 3676 & 3677113P Ref: TPR 11249 To City of Federal Way: A review of our records indicates there are no active Olympic Pipelines owned or operated by BP Pipelines (North America) Inc. within the scope provided for the above referenced project. Included with this letter is a vicinity map labeled "Exhibit A" indicating the location of the proposed project. If the scope of your project has changed please contact Chase Wakefield at 425- 981-2575 or via email at chase.wakefield@bp.com. Please note that 811 the national One -Call number must be contacted for clearance prior to any excavation. Sincerely, Tim Fehr 3rd Party Contract Right of Way Supervisor Representing Olympic Pipe Line Company LLC TF: cw EXHIBIT B Vicinity Map Stacey Welsh From: LeSmith, Rose <Rose.LeSmith@kingcounty.gov> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 3:31 PM To: Ping Inquiry; Brian Davis Subject: City of Federal Way SEPA Determination DNS DaVita Healthcare Office Park (File No:17-105643-SE) May 17, 2019 TO: Brian Davis, Community Development Director, Federal Way FR: Rose LeSmith, P.E., County Traffic Engineer, King County Road Services Division RE: City of Federal Way SEPA Determination DNS DaVita_ Healthcare Office Park (File No:17- 105643-SE) Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Federal Way's Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the proposed DaVita Healthcare Office Park (File No: 17-105643-SE). The proposed DaVita Healthcare Office Park is one of four significantly sized developments planned for a portion of Federal Way that currently experiences high traffic volumes and congestion on local, regional and state roads. The four development projects include: DaVita Healthcare Office Park; Greenline Warehouse A; Greenline Warehouse B; and Greenline Business Park. It appears that the DaVita Healthcare Office Park SEPA determination is an incremental project -level approach to SEPA compliance and is insufficient to address anticipated increases to traffic volumes and congestion on already congested local, regional and state roads. King County reviewed the DaVita Healthcare Office Park project proposal and SEPA determination (DNS). This project proposes to construct a 57.5-foot tall, 161,280 sq. ft. office building with 211 parking spaces and associated site work on a 5.22 acre parcel. A parking lot with 470 parking spaces and associated site work is proposed on two adjacent parcels located to the north totaling 6.32 acres. Build -out for this project is proposed for 2020. Per the November 9, 2018 updated traffic impact analysis (TIA) completed for the project, approximately 1,814 daily trips will be generated, along with 288 AM peak hour trips and 276 PM peak hour trips. Access to the DaVita site will be from a new connection to the 32nd Avenue South/South 323d Street roundabout along with a driveway to South 323�d Street immediately east of the roundabout. Access to the parking lot to the north of the site will be from one driveway to 32nd Avenue South and one driveway to South 323rd Street. The November 2018 TIA that was completed for this project was limited in scope and did not take into account the impacts to nearby unincorporated King County roads. A second limitation of the TIA was that it did not account for the traffic anticipated to be generated from three nearby commercial developments underway within Federal Way: Greenline Warehouse A, Greenline Warehouse B and Greenline Business Park. King County Road Services Division is concerned about the lack of mitigation, associated with the DaVita Healthcare Office Park, to address the anticipated increase in traffic congestion at the I- 5/South 320th Street interchange as well as the anticipated increased congestion along South 320" Street from Weyerhaeuser Way South to 1-5. A result of the increase in traffic volumes and congestion along South 320th Street and at the 1-5/South 320th Street interchange will be drivers seeking alternate routes to 1-5, such as the option of traveling north on Military Road South to South 272"d Street to make use of the 1-5/South 272"d Street interchange. After reviewing the individual TIAs completed for each of the four commercial projects (DaVita as well as the three Greenline developments), King County Road Services Division estimates that together these developments will generate the following trips: o 6,979 daily trips consisting of 6,171 passenger vehicle trips and 808 truck trips o 970 AM peak hour trips consisting of 863 passenger vehicle trips and 107 truck trips o 900 PM peak hour trips consisting of 805 passenger vehicle trips and 95 truck trips This large volume of additional traffic has the potential to degrade the LOS and travel times for the I- 5/South 320th Street interchange, the South 320th Street/ Weyerhaeuser Way South intersection, the South 3201h Street/32"d Avenue South intersection and the South 3201h Street/Peasley Canyon Road South corridor from the West Valley Highway to 1-5. King County roads such Military Road South, South 321 st Street, 51 st Avenue South, Peasley Canyon Road South would likely see an increase in congestion and travel times because of these developments. Please accept this email communication as a formal comment regarding Federal Way's threshold determination. The project scale DNS associated with the proposed DaVita Project does not sufficiently address anticipated traffic impacts to the overall roadway system surrounding the proposed development. King County requests that Federal Way conduct additional traffic evaluation to better understand and address these anticipated impacts and recommend appropriately scaled mitigation measures. We look forward to working with you to scope out an expanded traffic impact analysis that produces mitigation measures commensurate with the scope of this proposed warehouse development project. Stacey Welsh From: Tina Piety Sent: Friday, May 03, 2019 3:05 PM To: 'suzanne.l.anderson@usace.army.mil'; 'wfwoctap@fws.gov'; 'efsec@utc.wa.gov'; 'ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov)'; 'rob.ryan@wa.usda.goV; 'huben bj@dshs.wa.gov'; 'jford@agr.wa.gov'; 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; 'hgcustomerservice@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov'; 'sepa@dahp.wa.gov'; 'sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov'; 'randy.kline@parks.wa.gov'; 'chase.wakefield@bp.com'; 'char.naylor@puyalluptribe- nsn.gov'; 'info@psp.wa.gov'; 'wec@wecprotects.org'; 'kelly.cooper@doh.wa.gov'; 'David Hoffman'; 'eharris@psrc.org'; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; 'bra ndon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com';'karen.walter@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'dlewarch@suquamish.nsn.us'; 'Rebecca Martin'; 'matthew.perkins@kingcounty.gov';'harold.taniguchi@kingcounty.gov'; 'maint.roads@kingcounty.gov'; 'tvaslet@piercetransit.org'; 'neil.fujii@kingcounty.gov'; 'info@edc-seaking.org'; 'perry.weinberg@soundtransit.org'; 'jgreene@kingcounty.gov'; 'sampace@concentric.net'; 'info@forterra.org'; 'info@earthcorps.org'; 'Jennifer Wojciechowski'; 'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; 'jmagoon@cityoftacoma.org'; 'ksnyder@auburnwa.gov'; 'dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov'; 'stimm@cityofmilton.net'; 'bport@cityofmilton.net'; 'mike.bulzomi@soundtransit.org'; 'james.irish@soundtransit.org'; 'kent.hale@soundtransit.org'; 'kukesc@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'swiresm@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'palisof@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'koorust@yahoo.com'; 'courtney@mhseattle.com'; 'info@seattlelwv.org' Cc: Stacey Welsh Subject: DaVita Healthcare Office Park DNS Attachments: DaVita DNS and Checklist.pdf Hello, Attached you will find a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS), Staff Evaluation, Maps, and SEPA Checklist for the DaVita Healthcare Office Park project.. Please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stacey.welsh@citycffederalway.com, if you have any comments and/or questions regarding this DNS. Regards, E. Tina Piety, CAP, OM Administrative Assistant II Federal 'Nay Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com Stacey Welsh From: Tina Piety Sent: Friday, May 03, 2019 2:51 PM To: 'Eric Labrie' Cc: 'arthur.richey@davita.com'; 'savanna.nagorski@esmcivil.com'; Stacey Welsh; Doc Hansen; Kevin Peterson; Brian Davis; Sarady Long; 'Brian Asbury'; Chris Cahan Subject: DaVita Healthcare Office Park DNS Attachments: Threshold Determination.pdf; DaVita DNS and Checklist.pdf Hello, Attached you will find a threshold determination letter and enclosures (DNS and staff evaluation) for the DaVita Healthcare Office Park. A hard copy has been mailed. Please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stace .welsh cii ❑ffederafwa .corn, if you have any comments and/or questions regarding this determination and DNS. Regards, E. Tina Piety, CAP, OM Administrative Assistant II Fe-d' erai Way Community Development Department 33325 8ch Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www,cit offederalwa .corn STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Ken Spurrell, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Federal Way Mirror a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Federal Way Mirror has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Federal Way Mirror (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, (Ad #855239) a: FW Legals Published 1 time(s) beginning on 05/03/2019 and ending on 05/03/2019. The full amount of the fee charged for sai ,foregoing publication is the sum of $118.40. Ken Spurrelf Legal Advertising Representative, Federal Way 0..1.. -:1 A --A --- 4— — 41,ie ZrA in Tacoma, Washington ty of Federal Way VM855239 Federal way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFI- CANCE(DNS) DaVita Healthcare Office Park File No:17-105643-SE Proposal: Construction of a 57.5-toot-tall, 161,280 square -fact Office building with 211 parking spac- es and associated site work, on a parcel totaling 5,22 acres (parcel 2154650110). A parking lot with 470 parking spaces and associated site work Is proposed on two adjacent parcels located to the north, totaling 8.32 acres (parcels 2154650060 and 2154650090) and is part of the proposed ac- tl on. Proponent: Arthur Richey, DaVita, 6245 South Vic- tor Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136 ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205, Federal Way, WA 98003 Location: Next to the traffic circle at 32nd Avenue South and South 323rd Street, Federal Way, Par- cels #215465-0060, -0090, & -0110 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, 253-835-2634 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C. D30(2)(c). This decls Ion was made after re- view of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on May 17, 2019. Email comments should be directed to alanning ttyol- federalw r6m. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may ap- peal this daterminatlon to the Federal Way City CIark (�[y Hall, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 983003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 7, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination along with the re- quired appeal fee. You should be prepared to matte specific factual objections. All appeals shall contain a specific statement of reasons why the decision of the responsible official is alleged to be In error. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 3, 2019 #855239 16 Friday, May 3, 2019 Federal Way Mirror ) all _ LEGAL NOTICES ADVERTISEMENT TO BID deposit by a cashier's or certified check, or Bid eluded In This Action: Demolition, right-of-way, South King Fire & Rescue will be accepting sealed Bond in an amount equal to five percent (5%) of �_- engineering, critical area review, and construction bids for Rapid Intervention Team (RIT) Bags; the amount of such bid proposal. Should the suc- (�r.r�l �` permits. sealed bids will be accepted until 2:00 Phil on May cessful bidder fail to enter into a contract and fur- `1 Any person may participate in the public hear- 22, 2019, at the headquarters slallon located at nish satisfactory Performance Bond within the time NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFI- ing(s) by submitting written comments during 11Ie 31617 1st Ave S.. Federal Way, WA 98003. Bid stated in the specifications, the bid deposit or bond CANCE (ONS) Public Hearing It the City Clerk, by emailing gJIL- opening will occur at 2:01 PM on May 22, 2019. shall be forfeited to the City of Federal Way. DaVita Healthcare Office Park n1nn0cilvoffederahva%&Co , by delivering com- 814 packets will be available of MINIv M-ScUth• DESCRIPTION OF WORK: File No:17-105643-SE ments to the Community Development Department kingbre.orgl and at 31617 1st Avenue South, Fed- This project shall consist of: Proposal: Construction of a 57.5-foot-tall, 161.280 before the hearing, or by appearing at the hear- afal Way. The department contact IS LL Scot! Ea• Repairing and replacing storm sewer pipes with- square -foot office building with 211 parking spat- ing(s) and presenting public testimony in person, Yin (253.38N842). South King Fire & Rescue 15 in the City of Federal Way. The work includes re- es and associated site work, on a parcel totaling or through a representative. Only those persons an equal opportunity empkiyer and all quallfed pairing and replacing existing deteriorated storm 5,22 am (parse] 2154550110). A parking Ial v ith who have previously submitted comments pursu- bidders are encouraged to submit bids. sewer pipes and restoring disturbed existing im- 470 parking spaces and associated Site work Is ant to the above may appeal city council's deci- This notice shall be published in the Federal Way provements such as asphalt concrete pavement, proposO on Iwo adjacent parcels located TO the sion. Mirror at least 13 days before the bid deadline. If curb, gutter, driveway approaches, and landscap- north, tolafing 6.32 acres (parcels: 2154650060 The official file is available for review during no bid is received pursuant to this first call, the ing. and 2154650090) and is part o1 the proposed ac- working hours in the Department of Community Commissioners may re -advertise or enter into a The Contractor shall complete all work within 15 tion. Development (address above). The staff report to contract without a further call for bids. working days. Proponent: Arthur Richey, DaVlla, 6245 South Vic- the City Council will be available for review one # 855175 The bidder is urged to check the plans and con- for Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136 week before the hearing. Please direct questions to 5/3/19 tract provisions carefully. ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, 33400 8th Avenue Tony Doucette, P.E., at 253-835-2716, or to - All bid proposals shall be in accordance with the South, Suite 205, Federal Way, WA 98003 Instructions to Bidders and all other contract docu- Location: Next to the traffic circle at 32nd Avenue Published in the Federal Way Mirror May 3, 2019 ments. Any 40e81tons concerning the description South and South 323rd Street, Federal Way, Par- #855243 of the work Contained in the contract documents cels #215465-0060, -0090, & -0110 must be directed to Fei Tang, P.E., SWIM Project Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Federal Ward Engineer, by email at fei.tang®cityeffederal- staff Contact: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, Creating a Classified NOTICE way.com, or by letter addressed to Fei Tang, RE.. 253-835-2634 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) SWIM Project Engineer. The questions must be fe- The lead agency for this proposal has determined 2020-2025 Transportation Improvement Plan ceived by the City on or before Thursday, May 9, that it does not have a probable significant adverse ad is as easy as (Non -Project Action) 2019 to allow a written reply to reach all prospec- impact on the environment, and an environmental FILE NO:19-101959-00-SE tive Bidders before the submission of their bids. impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW Proposal: The Transportation Improvement Plan BID DOCUMENTS: 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after re- n 4 A (TIP) is a state mandated six -year plan for bans- Free -of -charge access to project bid documents view of a complaIed environmental checklist and L portatlon protects to be developed by local juris- (plans, specifications, addenda, and Bidders List) other information on file with the lead agency. This dicilons and is required to be updated annually. It is provided to Prime Bidders, Sobeontraelors, and information is available to the public on request. is intended to assure interagency coordination. Vendors by going to www.bxwa.com and clicking This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); �. Describe The Item. identification of needs for federal and state fund- on "Posted Projects," "Public Works," and "City of the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 ing, and provide data to metropolitan plaffi or- Federal Way." This online plan room provides Bid- days from the date below. Comments must be To sell the item quickly, ganizations to meet federal air quality s1 rds ders with fully usable online documents with the submitted by 5:00 p.m. on May 17, 2019. Email and financial feasibility. ability la download. view, print, order full/parlial comments should be directed to alanft tllyut- include important Proponent: Public Works Department - Traffic Di- plan sets from numerous reprograpfd4 sourtes, a>y�y.tom. vision and a Ifee online digitatrilake-ofl tool. it is recom- Unless modified by the city, this determination information about the item: Location: Non -project action - Citywide mended that Bidders "Register" in order to receive will become final following the above comment Lead Agency: City of Federal Way automatic e-mail notification of future addenda and deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final price, age%ondition, size Staff Contact: Associate Planner Leila Willoughby- to place themselves on the "Self -Registered Bid- determination may file an appeal. Anyone may ap- Oakes, 253-835-2644 ders List." Bidders that do not register will not be peal this dolerminaUan 10 the Federal Way City and brand name. The lead agency for this proposal has determined automatically notified of addenda and will need to C(erk (City Kali. 33325 81h Avenue South. Federal that it does not have a probable significant adverse periodically check the ori-line plan for addenda is- Way, WA 98003), no later than 6:00 p.m, an June impact on the environment, and an environmental sued on this project. C(Frit dt Builders F%Chango of 7, 2018, by a wrilten letter staling the reason for 2. Include Your Phone Impact statement PS) is not required under RCW Washington at (425) 258-1303, should you require the appeal of the deteamination along with the re- 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after re- assistance with access or registration. sicked appeal fee. You should be prepared to make Number And Specify slew of a complezd environmental checklist, Fed- An informational copy of plans, specifications, specific factual objections. All appeals shall Contain oral Way Comprehensive Plan, and other municipal and addenda are also available for viewing only at a specific statement of reasons why the decision of Hours. Policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated the Public Works Department, Federal Way City the responsible official is alleged to be in error. as a basis for exercise of substantive authority un- Hall, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, Wash- Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 3, You want to make it as easy der the Stale Environmental Policy Act pursuant to ington. 2019 #855239 RCW 43.21C. This information is available to the The City, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil as possible for the potential public on request. Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252. 42 U.S.C. 2000d Further information regarding this action is to 2000d-4 and Title 49 C.F.R., Department of customer to reach you. available to the public upon request from the De- Transportation, &!title A, Office of the Secretary, partment of Community Development. This DNS is Part 21, Nond(strimination in Federally-asslsled F"di{ al W,ty issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency programs of the Department of Transportation is- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the sued pursuant to such Act, hereby notifies all bid- Federal Way Link Extension (FWLE) Develop- 3. Don't Abbreviate! dale below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 ders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any merit Agreement p.m. on May 17, 2019. contract entered into pursuant to this advertise- Notice is hereby given that the Federal Way City Hve U Evr trd to rd an ad Unless modified by the city, this determination ment. disadvantaged business enterprises as de- Council will hold a public hearing during the regu- , , will become final following the above comment fined at 49 CFR Part 26 will be afforded full oppor- lar City Council meeting on May 21, 2019, in Fed- w/abb s. Its difficult to deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final tunity to submit bids in response to this invitation eral Way City Council Chambers (33325 8th Ave determination may file an appeal. Anyone may ap- and will not be discriminated against on the nue South, Federal Way, WA 98003) for the decipher, andmostreaders peal this determination to the Federal Way City grounds of race, color, national orlghl, or sex in Federal Way Link Extension Development Agree- , Clerk (City of Federal Way, 33325 8th Avenue consideration for an award. The CBty encourages ment and Essential Public Facility siting. wont take the time to figure South, WA 98003). no later than 5:00 p.m. on minority and women -owned firms to submit bids Description: A development agreement is pro - June 7, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason consistent with the City's policy to ensure that posed lacilitating the construction of high capacity it out or call to ask what it for the appeal of the determination. You should be such firms are afforded the maximum practicable rag to Made a structured parking garage; elevated means. SPELL IT OUT! prepared to make specific factual objections. opportunity to compete for and obtain public con- transit platform; and an alignment parallel with 1-5 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 3, tracts. with associated infrastrueture. As proposed, the 2019. #855245 The Contractor will be required to comply with all project expands the Link Light Rail system from local, State, and Federal laws and regulations per- the Angle Lake Station to the Federal Way Trwwt 4. Run Your Ad For taining to equal employment opportunities. Center. The community investment will improve The City anticipates awarding this project to the mobility and increase ridership capacity and con- Several Weeks. successful bidder and intends to give Notice to nectivity for regional transit connections. Proceed as soon as the Contract and all required Location: Starting at the northern city limits at To get the best results, run associated documents are executed in full. Regard- South 272nd Street, and runs parallel to 1-5 pri- v less of the date of award or Notice to Proceed, the marily within state right-od-way to South 317th your ad for several weeks. Ft.-dt'rEtl Way Contractor must complete all work under this pro- Street, where it curves totarard the Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ject within 15 working days. Transit Center and terminates south of South New buyers look to the REQUEST FOR BIDS RESERVATION OF RIGHTS: 320th Street. 2019 Storm Pipe Repair Phase 1 RFB 419-003 The City of Federal Way reserves the right to raiect Applicant: Wilbert Santos, Sound Transit classified marketplace every SUBMITTAL OF SEALED BIDS: any and a0 bids, waive apy fnformalitlos or minor City Staff: Tony Doucette, P.E., 253-835-2716 Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way, Irregularities in the bidding, and determine which Dale of Notice of Application: May 3, 2019 day. If you run your ad only Washington, will receive sealed bids through May bid or bidder meals the criteria Set forth in the bid Dale of Public Hearing: May 21, 2019 14, 2019. at 10:00 a.m., at the City Hall Purchasing documents. No bidder may withdraw his or her bid Environmental Determination: A State Environ- one week, you may miss a Office or by US Mall at City of Federal Way, Pur- after the hour set for the opening thereof unless mental Policy Act (SERA) Determination of Signifi- chaeing Office, 33325 Sth Avenue South, Federal the award is delayed for a period exceeding thirty cance was issued on June 6, 2013. A Final Envi- potential buyer. Way, Washington 9SO03. Proposals received after (30) days, ronmental Impact Statement was issued by the 10,00 a.m. on said date Wit not be considered. Dated the 26 day of April, 2019. Lead Agency in November 2016. The Federal Tran- BID OPENING: Dates of Publication: sit Administration and Federal Highway Admmis- All bids will be opened and read publicly aloud at Daily Journal of Commerce: April 27, 2019 tratien issued National Environmental Policy Act Call Classifieds Today! 10:10 am. on May 14, 2019, at Hylebos Meeting May 4, 2019 Records of Decision in March 2017. Room, 33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way, Federal Way Mirror: April 26, 2019 Relevant Environmental Documents Are 1-800-388-2527 Washington, for this RFB. www.cityolfederalway.com/bids May 3, 2019 Available at the Address Below: X YES _ NO All bid proposals shall be accompanied by a bid #853985 Other Permits Known at This Time and not In- 41k Y OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www,cityoffederalway.corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, �hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washi to hat a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance �(DS) and Scoping Notice CY/Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or osted to or at each of the attached addresses on Z — I q 2018. Project Name �"` V' l C �� File Number(s) Signature r Date S K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 St Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DaVita Healthcare Office Park File No: 17-105643-SE Proposal: Construction of a 57.5-foot-tall, 161,280 square -foot office building with 211 parking spaces and associated site work, on a parcel totaling 5.22 acres (parcel 2154650110). A parking lot with 470 parking spaces and associated site work is proposed on two adjacent parcels located to the north, totaling 6.32 acres (parcels 2154650060 and 2154650090) and is part of the proposed action. Proponent: Arthur Richey, DaVita, 6245 South Victor Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136 ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, 33400 8"' Avenue South, Suite 205, Federal Way, WA 98003 Location: Next to the traffic circle at 32nd Avenue South and South 323`d Street, Federal Way, Parcels #215465-0060, -0090, & -0110 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, 253-835-2634 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on May 17, 2019. Email comments should be directed to planning acityoffederalway.coin. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (City Hall, 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 7, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination along with the required appeal fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. All appeals shall contain a specific statement of reasons why the decision of the responsible official is alleged to be in error. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 3, 2019 17-105643-00-SE Daa LD. 79088 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way www.citvoffederalwo.y.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, E. Tina Pietv hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice El Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation `L Other r ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was El emailed 121 mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on May 2 & May 3, Project Name DaVita Helathcare Office Park File Number(s) 17-1056 43-5E Signature E:zl Date May 3. 2019 CITY o, � Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (.DNS) DaVita Healthcare Office Park File No: 17-105643-SE Proposal: Construction of a 57.5-foot tall, 161,280 square -foot office building with 211 parking spaces and associated site work, on a parcel totaling 5.22 acres (parcel 2154650110). A parking lot with 470 parking spaces and associated site work is proposed on two adjacent parcels located to the north totaling 6.32 acres (parcels 2154650060 and 2154650090) and is part of the proposed action. Proponent: Arthur Richey, DaVita, 6245 South Victor Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136 ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, 33400 80' Avenue South, Suite 205, Federal Way, WA 98003 Location: Next to the traffic circle at 32"d Avenue South and South 323rd Street, Federal Way, Federal Way Parcels #215465-0060, -0090, & -0110 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, 253-835-2634 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on May 17, 2019. Email comments should be directed to plannin cityoffederalway.com. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (address below), no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 7, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination along with the required appeal fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. All appeals shall contain a specific statement of reasons why the decision of the responsible official is alleged to be in error. Responsible Official: Brian Davis Title: Community Development Director Address: 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: 253-835-2612 Date Issued: May 3, 2019 Signature: 17-105643-00-SE Doc I.D. 79087 I_. SUZANNE ANDERSON US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVCE ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH 510 DESMOND DR SE #102 PO BOX 3755 LACEY WA 98503 SEATTLE WA 98124 wfwoctap(a.fws.gov suza n ne. l.a nderson (a),u sace.armv. m i I DEPT OF ECOLOGY SEPA UNIT PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 separep isterfecy. wa. gov JACLYN FORD DEPT OF AGRICULTURE PO BOX 42560 OLYMPIA, WA 98504-2560 ford a r.wa. ov RAMIN PAZOOKI WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 330310 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 ram in. pazooki@wsdat.wa.gov DEPT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 sera a@dahp.wa,aov CHASE WAKEFIELD (SALEM LAND) BP OLYMPIC PIPE LINE 600 SW 39TH ST RENTON WA 98057 chase. wakefieldCa7bp.com WASH ENVIRON COUNCIL 1402 3RD AVE STE 1400 SEATTLE WA 98101-2179 wec wec rotects.or PSRC GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT 1011 WESTERN AVE #500 SEATTLE WA 98104-1040 eharris(c7psrc.orq MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE FISHERIES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172ID AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 karen_walter muckleshoot.nsn.us NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC 941 POWELL AVE SW STE 102 RENTON WA 98057-2115 rob. ryan _.wa.usda.gov REVIEW TEAM WA DEPT OF COMMERCE GROWTH MGT SERVICES PO BOX 42525 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2525 reviewteam commerce.wa. ov JAMEY TAYLOR DNR SEPA CENTER PO BOX 47015 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 se acenter dnr.wa, ov DEPT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PO BOX 43200 OLYMPIA WA 98504-3155 sepadesk .,dfw.wa.gov CHAR NAYLOR ASSISTANT HABITAT DIRECTOR WATER QUALITY PROGRAM MGR char. naylor _ouyaliu tribe-nsn :gov KELLY COOPER DEPT OF HEALTH ENVIRON HEALTH DIV PO BOX 47820 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7820 keilv.cooper c@doh.wa._gav ATTN SEPA REVIEW PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 1904 3RD AVE STE 105 SEATTLE WA 98101-3317 sepa0pscleanair.orq LAURA MURPHY TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us ENERGY FACILITY SITE EVALUATION COUNCIL 1300 EVERGREEN PARK DRIVE PO BOX 43172 OLYMPIA, WA 98504-3172 efsec utc.wa. ov DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SVCS LANDS AND BUILDING DIVISION PO BOX 45848 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 hubenbi@dshs.wa.clov WA ST DEPT TRANSPORTATION PO BOX 47300 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7300 hgcustomerservice@wsdoLwa.gov WA NATURAL HERITAGE DNR PO BOX 47014 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov WASH STATE PARKS AND REC PO BOX 42668 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2668 rand .Kline arks.wa. ov PUGET SOUND PARTNERSHIP 210 11TH AVE SW STE 401 OLYMPIA WA 98504-0900 info s .wa. ov MASTER BUILDERS ASSOC 335 116TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98004-6407 d hoffman (cam oaks. corn BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 brandon, reynonQpuyalluptribe.com DENNIS LEWARCH THP OFFICE SUQUAMISH TRIBE 18490 SUQUAMISH WAY SUQUAMISH WA 98392 dlewa rch (ftuq uam ish. nsm us KING COUNTY PARKS & REC KING CO TRANSPORTATION KING CO ROADS DIVISION 201 S JACKSON ST # 700 201 S JACKSON ST KSC-TR-0815 COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER SEATTLE WA 98104 SEATTLE WA 98104 155 MONROE AVE NE matthew.perkinskinqcounty.ciov harold,tani uchi kin count . ov RENTON WA 98056 maint.roads ,_kingcounty_;goy TINA VASLET SOLID WASTE DIV ECON DEV COUNCIL OF PIERCE TRANSIT KING CO DEPT OF NATURAL RES SEATTLE & KING COUNTY PO BOX 99070 201 S JACKSON ST STE 701 1301 5T" AVE STE 1500 LAKEWOOD WA 98496-0070 SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 SEATTLE WA 98101 tvaslet@-Piercetransit.org neil.fuiii@kingcounty._gov info .edc-seaking.org JOHN GREENE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS PERRY WEINBERG KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV OF SOUTH KING COUNTY SOUND TRANSIT ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 PO BOX 66037 401 S JACKSON ST 201 S JACKSON ST BURIEN WA 98166 SEATTLE WA 98104-2826 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 info@seattlelwv.cm perry.weinberg@soundtransit.org igreene@kingcounty.gov SAM PACE FORTERRA EARTHCORPS SEA/KING CO ASSOC/REALTORS KING COUNTY OFFICE FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS 29839 154T" AVE SE 901 5T" AVE STE. 2200 6310 NE 74T" ST STE 201 E KENT WA 98042-4557 SEATTLE-WA 98164 SEATTLE, WA 98115 sampaceaa,concentric.net info(a7forterra.om info@earthcorps.org EPA DAVID KORTHALS KC DEPT OF ASSESSMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC METRO TRANSIT 500 4T" AVE RM 700 1200 6TH AVE MD-126 201 S JACKSON ST KSC-TR-0413 #ADM-AS-0708 SEATTLE WA 98101 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 SEATTLE WA 98104 epa-seattle(pa.goov david.korthalsakingcountv.4ov assessor. info plansreview(a7kingco�gov __kingcountv.gav - BRIAN ASBURY SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE FW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST 31617 1ST AVE S PO BOX 3440 PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 cliris.cahan(o)southkingfire.org rmartin@federalwaychamber.com basbucy@lakehaven.org JENNIFER WOJCIECHOWSKI CITY OF TACOMA CITY OF AUBURN FWPS 747 MARKET ST 25 W MAIN ST 33330 8T" AVE S TACOMA WA 98402-3769 AUBURN WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us ksnyderC6,auburnwa.qov iwoiciec(d,)fwps.org 0magoon(a),cityoftacoma.orq SUE TIMM CITY OF DES MOINES CITY OF MILTON MIKE BULZOMI 21630 11T" AVE S 1000 LAUREL ST D TRANSIT SOUNDe. DES MOINES WA 98198 MILTON WA 98354 aC7soundtransit.org dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov stimmCa7citvofmilton.net bpo rt(o)citvofmilton. net JAMES IRISH KENT HALE BPA TER 3 SOUND TRANSIT SOUND TRANSIT 28401 COVINGTON WAY SE iames.irishp_soundtransit_orq kent.hale soundtransit.or KENT WA 98042 WA DEPT OF NATURAL KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT KRISTI KYLE RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PLN OAP PSE REGIONAL STRUCTURE MS KSC-NR-0505 PO BOX 47015 PO BOX 97034 OLYMPIA WA 98504 201 S JACKSON ST BELLEVUE WA 98009-9734 SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 OSP ENGINEERING WA/OR/N ID LAND USE SVC KCDDES CENTURY LINK COMMUNICATIONS AT&T CABLE MAINTENANCE 35030 SE DOUGLAS ST # 210 23315 66T" AVE S 11241 WILLOWS RD NE STE 130 SNOQUALMIE WA 98065-9266 KENT WA 98032 REDMOND WA 98052-1009 JERRY STEELE CAMERON KUKES MIKE SWIRES COMCAST CABLE COMM WSDOT WSDOT 4020 AUBURN WAY N kukesc .wsdot.wa.g AUBURN WA 98002-1315 ov swiresm aC7wsdot.wa. oy KOORUS TAHGHIGHI COURTNEY KAYLOR FELIXBERTO PALISOC 33205 38T" AVE S MCCULLOUGH HILL LEARY PS WSDOT FEDERAL WAY WA 98001 701 FIFTH AVE STE 6600 palisof@wsdot.wa.gov koorustp_yahoo.com SEATTLE WA 98104 courtney@mhseattle.com DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A�k 33325 8fh Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cltyoffederclway.com Federal Way DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, E. Tina Piety hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice I] Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was ❑ emailed ❑x mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on May 2, , 2019. Project Name DaVita Helathcare Office Park File Number(s) 17- Signature Date Mav 2.2019 CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DaVita Healthcare Office Park File No: 17-105643-SE Proposal: Construction of a 57.5-foot-tall, 161,280 square -foot office building with 211 parking spaces and associated site work, on a parcel totaling 5.22 acres (parcel 2154650110). A parking lot with 470 parking spaces and associated site work is proposed on two adjacent parcels located to the north, totaling 6.32 acres (parcels 2154650060 and 2154650090) and is part of the proposed action. Proponent: Arthur Richey, DaVita, 6245 South Victor Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136 ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, 33400 8d' Avenue South, Suite 205, Federal Way, WA 98003 Location: Next to the traffic circle at 32"d Avenue South and South 323rd Street, Federal Way, Parcels #215465-0060, -0090, & -0110 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, 253-835-2634 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on May 17, 2019. Email comments should be directed to Manning(@_cityoifederalway.com. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (City Hall, 33325 8d' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 7, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination along with the required appeal fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. All appeals shall contain a specific statement of reasons why the decision of the responsible official is alleged to be in error. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 3, 2019 Doc. I.D. 79088 17-105643-00-SE EXHIBIT B Vicinity Map U) d N N Q 3 O � c •� 0 C O V U Rf Qi ~ E O z � Z o a i a m >+r N C x rn F 14- a O IL C N J 0 0 C. N 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 O Q O, all O, O, C\ N N N O, O, 01 O, k OIDCU) 33300 00 00CD 333 3 3 ¢ ¢ a Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a Q ¢ ¢ ¢ O O J a w w O w w w w w 0 O O www w¢ ¢ 7t C) CD H C'4 N_ Cw/] �w-' C/] Fw-' Cn Ew" C/] Q. on O N O N _ k W `n w W ¢ W ¢ W ¢ onf'� w U) W V) w > > w ¢ ¢ ¢ J ¢ w � � r- - - U A A A x x F- x C rn w rn rn o�, a a a z N z N z N C) o O 0 O C o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O oM N N N N 0 000 O O O CNa O O W O 0., N r N N Mc N N M N M k U „ U W r al 00 00 U W Q U W W W U U U Q Q Q Z u A A C7ua LnC7Cn ¢ d OwOwOW Oa F. H U�UxUx UA ¢ x W a a a Q- N H Ha U W Q U O w O O O O Ew- a Q a Q Ua' O O o H 0 W O U O U O z z z z aG z P4 z n� a� z ¢ a x � ce W W� �. O W W z W W W 0 O O U Q F W W w L o Q W U 0 V� Q CACf) 0CIO cn G7 U A�D ww > � w�,w3wwwo, a a A a ¢¢ z O O U Qxc7�¢x�Qx¢¢xx¢ ¢ ¢ aU aw w z> xa � u;aZUr�Ou;w�a;r.�U U U aQw �3��3�333w33w w w �o�W - 00 O -- O o "D 0 00 0 2, 0 O 0 0 N 0 M 0 tr) o O 00 o O O O o O o O O — D1 Q1 O O 0 O O0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � '� V) V) kr) V) V7 V) Vl \0 V) �.O N �.O V) �-O O 00 CD 00 O 00 O 00 � 00 'ItO 00 N N V) V) V) V) V) V) V) kn V) V1 V) V) V) n V) V1 V) V) N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N r N Ch LO CO 1` M M O T N M LO (0 I-- OD CY) O m c m N L O V d w O N L.� -4Q u- Ul U C3 City of 300' Parcel Federal Way Notification area 599970- 0010 797820- 0535 797820- 0540 797820- 7M97820.05750 0528 ay, rest ids r I u 215465- 0170 162104 9056 162104- 9013 Legend King County Tax Parcels Subject Property Notified Properties ; W104— 4 092104 I --s-�o-fN--sT 215465- 0010 215465- 0050 15465- 0080 September 2017 City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way We. 9B003 (253) - 835 - 7000 www.cityoffederalway.com 551560-r 551560-1 w1�551560- 551580- 0010 0015 0020 i002e 0030 1 U— 651580 0037 215480' 215485 0010 0150- 215465- 215480- 01301 130 F 104- 0030 05 215480- 54M s 0020 W N 215484 0010 215465- 0080 215484- 0020 215465• 215465- 152104- 0090 0100 9052 g R sx 215465 f 2154e5- 0110 II 215465- 0160 _ 0120 152104- 216485�'� 9037 f521oa 9145 152104 9142 tb'L7�04- 9022 152104- 9201 152104- 9178 182104- R ECG 9030 -NFU 2 2 2017 CITY W DERAL WqqY CCWMUN i OEVELCP II� iB21 Lake I1521 fl 9123 f- 91-0?3� 0005 Scale: N 0 175 350 Feet 1 I CITY Of Ak Federal Way This map Is Intended for use as a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to Its accuracy. RESUBMITTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MAY 0 2 2019 33325 81h Avenue South 50 CITY OF 1001%Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal WaCV of FirQEr-lAL Y�AY 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 ;p•MMUNV DEVELOPMENT plannin cityofPederalwayxotn www.cit offederalwa .cam NOTICE OF APPLICATION SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE Project Name:,V Project File No: il- 105 L, '1 Z) Project Address: 1) -4 St Installed By: rl G Date of Installation: i Location of Installation: CA *Please forward pictures of the posted sign to the project's planner.* I' i 1—i d-i a 'i 1—i i-i d-i dia'id—idrid i 1% 1 '1 d—id'i1%J% d_fa_id%d'i 9_1d—id'id_fd'iJ 1-ii d'i .. s. �. ar .. .r •wr. •e. •rr •w• •w. •�. •*a •a. a. v. w •e« •w• a. � w .r .. -ar •®.r •�. •rr �. •r. •a. •Nr I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards outlined in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code' and that the sign will be maintained until a final decision is issued on the land use action and/or environmental threshold determination. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. (kan r1k Aw ' Installer's Name afterIs Ignature -5/1111 Date 2-13 -X 3S - &/112 Phone Bulletin #036 —March 7, 2018 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Sign Installation Certificate f-JL t . � • . . a �G « � � . ^ ~ \ • � � \ . \ \\,®. Z � ƒ�\ \ » � �` � ( J �� � � •� � :y, K :y� y � - ■� a) . ./ Vol. 4\ // r lv . �■ ���m � \��\. - <»» ■S w . . \�2 ■ ,� . - 2� �b. ♦ . � 4 /: . - �%2 � 3 . . . � Viz'• : ¥�� �` � ! �-# � ,' • y, - '�, A e1. . / '�2•� \� : / Stacey Welsh From: Savanna Nagorski <Savanna.Nagorski@esmcivil.com> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2019 9:34 AM To: Stacey Welsh Subject: RE: notice boards Attachments: DaVita Notice Posting.pdf Hi Stacey, Attached is the Sign Installation Certificate for DaVita SEPA. Savanna Nagorski, MS ESM Consulting Engineers, LL.c www.esrn morn From: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Welsh cityoffederalway.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 3:00 PM To: Savanna Nagorski <Savanna.Na orski esmcivil.com> Subject: notice boards Savanna, The 2 public notice boards for the DaVita SEPA will be ready for pick up starting tomorrow afternoon at Will Call in the Permit Center between 9:00 and 4:00 (Mon -Fri). No fee is due. The signs must be installed by close of business this Friday, May 3rd. The two boards out there now need to be replaced. Let me know if you have any questions. Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner Federal Way 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone: 253/835-2634 www.cit offecle ra lwa .corn K CITE' OF ";W-N—� Federal Way COMMUNI-1'X DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, 1A'A 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 Iannin a, trnfrederalway.coa www.cityoffederalway.com NOTICE OF APPLICATION SIGN INSTALLAT10f,,� CERTIFICATE r. Project Name: U, rv— Project File No: -1- 0 t, iq Project Address: _ -IJ-) i A,� A-w ,-,c-4- ,Q ' j 7-,5.- R+- Installed By: _1. Vann _��,1��k-� �� Date of Installation: i Location of Installation: -d523C2� St - *Please forward pictures of the posted sign to the project's planner.* � rta sx za � �., :ter =a. � ¢.� � -,ff. rs ax �. ,_ u„ � a+ .�, o. .e;- �,, � �. �• m. �. �, are � � I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards outlined in Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 19 `"Zoning and Development Code' and that the sign will be maintained until a final decision is issued on the land use action and/or environmental threshold determination. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. Q Installer's Name A 14- , 1 to er's zgnarure r Date ; 51- 13 S ft Phone Bulletin #036 —March 7, 2018 page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Sign Installation Certificate DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 CITY OF www.cifyoffedera[way.com Federal Way DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION i, E. Tina Piety hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was 0 emailed ❑ mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on Mgy I, , 2019. Project Name DaVita Heiathcare Office Park File Number(s) 17- 4 Signature Date LAay 1. 2019 o L4%40�,� CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DaVita Healthcare Office Park File No: 17-105643-SE Proposal: Construction of a 57.5-foot-tall, 161,280 square -foot office building with 211 parking spaces and associated site work, on a parcel totaling 5.22 acres (parcel 2154650110). A parking lot with 470 parking spaces and associated site work is proposed on two adjacent parcels located to the north, totaling 6.32 acres (parcels 2154650060 and 2154650090) and is part of the proposed action. Proponent: Arthur Richey, DaVita, 6245 South Victor Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136 ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC, 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205, Federal Way, WA 98003 Location: Next to the traffic circle at 32❑d Avenue South and South 323rd Street, Federal Way, Parcels #215465-0060, -0090, & -0110 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, 253-835-2634 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on May 17, 2019. Email comments should be directed to lannin cit offederalwa .com. Unless modified by the city, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the city's final determination may file an appeal. Anyone may appeal this determination to the Federal Way City Clerk (City Hall, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003), no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 7, 2019, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination along with the required appeal fee. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. All appeals shall contain a specific statement of reasons why the decision of the responsible official is alleged to be in error. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on May 3, 2019 17-105643-00-SE Doc. I.D. 79088 Tina Pie From: Ken Spurrell <legals@tacomadailyindex.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2019 10:21 AM To: Tina Piety Cc: Stacey Welsh; Leila Willoughby -Oakes Subject: Re: Legal Notices Received 3 notices for the FWM, thank you. Ken Spurrell Publisher Direct: 253-232-5219 Internal: 15001 Fax: 253-627-2253 15 Oregon Ave, Suite 101, Tacoma, WA 98409 Hi Sound Publishing Man Print Rates Qnline Rates Media Kit Sound Info On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:08 AM Tina Piety Nina.Pieiy@cityoffederalway.com> wrote: Hello, Please publish the attached legal notices (DaVita DNS, 17-105643-SE; TIP DNS, 19-101959-SE; and FWLE Agreement Notice of Public Hearing) in the Federal Way Mirror's Friday (5/3/2019) issue. Please furnish affidavits of publication. This is for the Community Development account 83722477. Thank you, Tina E. Tina Piety, CAP -OM Administrative Assistant II Ai If Dr Y�_ Federal Way Community Development Department 1 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cjtVoffcdem1way.com Stacey Welsh From: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 3:39 PM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Savanna Nagorski; Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Hi Stacey, Please extend the SEPA deadline another 60 days. Thank you, EIC LAME, A.I.C.P. E M Consulting Engineers, LLC www.esmcfvil.com From: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Welsh@cityoffederalway.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2018 1:33 PM To: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Cc: Savanna Nagorski <Savanna.Nago rski@esmcivil.com> Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Eric, The extension request below has lapsed, will you be submitting another? Thank you, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner Federal Way 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone: 253/835-2634 www.citvoffederalwa,v.com From: Eric LaBrie[mailto:eric.labrie@esmcivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 7:22 AM To: Stacey Welsh Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Good morning Stacey, We met with DaVita last Friday and received direction to move forward with a slightly reconfigured building design. In brief, they are phasing the building (160,000 sf in phase 1 and another 40,000 sf in phase 2). We have begun revising the plans and SEPA checklist and anticipate getting a submittal back to the City in about 3 weeks. With this new direction, please extend the SEPA deadline another 90 days. Thank you very much, ERIC LABRIE, A.I.C.P. ESM Consulting Engineers, LI_C www.esmcivii.com From: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Welsh@cityoffederalway.com> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 4:52 PM To: Eric LaBrie <eric,labrie@esmcivil.com> Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Eric, We are coming up to the FWRC 14.10.020(6) SEPA threshold determination deadline for the 60 day extension provided for the DaVita project. Please request an extension as staff has provided a technical comment letter with items that will need to be addressed before a threshold determination can be made on this project. Also what is the status on the project resubmittal in response to the April 10, 2018 technical comment letter? Thank you, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner or. o, Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone: 253/835-2634 www.citvoffederalway.com From: Stacey Welsh Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 11:19 AM To: 'Eric LaBrie' Cc: Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney; Savanna Nagorski Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Received. Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner off., Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone: 253/835-2634 www.cityoffederalway..com From: Eric LaBrie[mailto:eric.lahrie@esmcivii.com] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 10:29 AM To: Stacey Welsh Stacey Welsh From: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 12:10 PM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney; Savanna Nagorski; Laura Bartenhagen; Doc Hansen; Brian Davis Subject: RE: DaVita Healthcare, Process III and SEPA Materials (File #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE) Hi Stacey, Your summary is correct. On 9/14 all consultants were directed to stop work on the project; therefore, the missing items were not submitted. We are following up with our traffic engineer and the arborist/forester to get you the three items noted as soon as possible. Our client's request for expedited review may be unrealistic based on current city policy; however, if there is anything that can be done while we are waiting on the missing items to be submitted (such as sending out the critical areas report), it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, ERIC LABRIE, A.I.C.P. ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC www.esrncivii.com From: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Welsh@cityoffederalway.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 11:45 AM To: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Cc: Arthur Richey <Arthur.Richey@davita.com>; Mark Kinney <Mark.Kin ney@davita.com>; Savanna Nagorski <Savanna.Nagorski @esmcivil.com>; Laura Bartenhagen<laura.bartenhagen@esmcivil.com>; Doc Hansen <Robert.Hansen @cityoffederalway.com>; Brian Davis <Brian.Davis@cityoffederalway.com> Subject: RE: DaVita Healthcare, Process III and SEPA Materials (File #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE) Eric, I was out of the office from 10/3-10/8. Your message was received on 10-2-18. 1 would like to recap recent events to ensure the city's correct understanding regarding various messages on the resubmittal: 9-12-18: • A resubmittal in response to the city's 4-10-18 technical comment letter is received by the city. • Via discussion at the counter, ESM indicated that there are three outstanding items that were to be resubmitted as follows: traffic report -by the end of the month; revised tree report -within a week; Forest Practices Application -within a week. 9-14-18: • A request to withdraw the materials submitted on 9-12-18 is received by the city. The letter states, in part, "We have been instructed to withdraw the materials as they depict different plans than what was approved from the Public Works department on September 10 (letter received September 13) regarding right-of-way improvements". • An email is received by staff that states, in part, "We respectfully request that the City stop all review the materials as the applicant may withdraw the application in its entirety". 10-2-18: • An email is received by staff that states, in part, "Our client would like to take the DaVita project off of hold and they respectfully request your prompt attention and cooperation in working toward receipt of a land use decision by the end of this month (October, 2018)". The 9-12-18 submittal is incomplete. As of today the 3 outstanding items listed above still have not been submitted. When the withdrawal request was submitted, via discussion at the counter, ESM indicated that revised plans would be resubmitted to address the street modification decisions. Will ESM be resubmitting any other materials related to the DaVita project? The resubmittal will need to be routed for review by city staff and outside agencies. In addition the city's wetland consultant will need to review the resubmitted critical areas report. Technical review will take time. As you know from previous projects a SEPA determination, once issued, has a two week comment period followed by a three week appeal period. Land use decisions are issued at a time after the conclusion of the SEPA appeal period. These factors prevent a land use decision from being issued by the end of October 2018. Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner F eral May 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone: 253/835-2634 www. cityoffedera lway,co_m From: Eric LaBrie [mailto:eric.labrie esmcivil.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 4:33 PM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney; Savanna Nagorski; Laura Bartenhagen; Doc Hansen Subject: RE: DaVita Healthcare, Process III and SEPA Materials (File #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE) Importance: High Hello Stacey, Our client would like to take the DaVita project off of hold and they respectfully request your prompt attention and cooperation in working toward receipt of a land use decision by the end of this month (October, 2018). We recognize that this is a quick turn -around and whatever you can do to help achieve this goal is greatly appreciated by the applicant and DaVita. If you, or any other staff members, would like to meet to resolve any questions or concerns, we will make ourselves available immediately in an effort to make this project successful as quickly as possible. Please confirm receipt of this message, and we thank you for your attention to this project. ERIC LABRIE, A.I.C.P. ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC www.esmcivii.com From: Eric LaBrie Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 12:09 PM To: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Welsh@cityoffederalway.com> "cc: Arthur Richey <Arthur.Richey@davita.com>; Mark Kinney <Mark.Kinne davita.com>; Savanna Nagorski <Savanna.Na orski esmcivil.com>; Laura Bartenhagen <Iaura.bartenha en esmcivil.com> Subject: DaVita Healthcare, Process III and SEPA Materials (File #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE) Hi Stacey, As you know, on behalf of our client, we were requested to withdraw the Process III and SEPA materials that were submitted on September 12th, 2018 for the DaVita project reference above. I understand that the City will not return the application materials since they are now a part of the public record. We respectfully request that the City stop all review the materials as the applicant may withdraw the application in its entirety. I expect to know more before the response deadline of October 7th, 2018. Thank you. ERIC LABRIE, A.I.C.P. ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC President www.esrncivil.com eric. labriw5esmcivi1.cam Federal Way I Everett 33400 8th Avenue S, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 Tel: 253.838.6113 office 206,491.3415 cell 253.944.1503 direct Civil Engineering I Surveying I Land Planning I Landscape Architecture I GIS Stacey Welsh From: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 4:33 PM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney; Savanna Nagorski; Laura Bartenhagen; Doc Hansen Subject: RE: DaVita Healthcare, Process III and SEPA Materials (File #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE) Importance: High Hello Stacey, Our client would like to take the DaVita project off of hold and they respectfully request your prompt attention and cooperation in working toward receipt of a land use decision by the end of this month (October, 2018). We recognize that this is a quick turn -around and whatever you can do to help achieve this goal is greatly appreciated by the applicant and DaVita. If you, or any other staff members, would like to meet to resolve any questions or concerns, we will make ourselves available immediately in an effort to make this project successful as quickly as possible. Please confirm receipt of this message, and we thank you for your attention to this project. ERIC LABRIE, A.I.C.P. ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC www.esmcl Vl1.corri From: Eric LaBrie Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 12:09 PM To: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Weksh cFtvoffederalway.com> Cc: Arthur Richey <Arthur.Richey davita.com>; Mark Kinney <Mark.Kinne davita.com>; Savanna Nagorski <5avanna.Na>>ol-skl esmcivil.com>; Laura Bartenhagen <aura.bartenha>;en esmcivil.com> Subject: DaVita Healthcare, Process III and SEPA Materials (File #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE) Hi Stacey, As you know, on behalf of our client, we were requested to withdraw the Process III and SEPA materials that were submitted on September 12th, 2018 for the DaVita project reference above. I understand that the City will not return the application materials since they are now a part of the public record. We respectfully request that the City stop all review the materials as the applicant may withdraw the application in its entirety. I expect to know more before the response deadline of October 7th, 2018. Thank you. ERIC LABRIE, A.I.C.P, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC President ZdQ la r m il. m ede ri Vvfay . Evcru' 3349 8ili ,Av2,nue S, ui e 205 Fcf cleral Way, VVA 98003 re!: 253,8`8.61613 office 2C1<6.9 t.34 '5 CCH 253,944.:15C 3 direct Ovil Enginew'lririg st vtl ng Lam.; sand �ci.'pe Archif.e.c`ore GI'. 40k CITY 10'::tSP OF Federal Way Department of Community Development Services p 33325 8th Avenue South RESUBMITTED Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 SEP 12 2018 www.citvoffederalway.com CRY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist.• Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization, or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts, or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicant.- Vidpj This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies and/or reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process, as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts ofyourproposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal, and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first, but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonprojectproposalr DLelpj For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans, and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B, plus the SU PPI.I.NJ UN k'Al . SI 1EI. 1' F[ }R N C ]N Plt[ 1 I x _ I' A[ " 1'I ON5 art D _ Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for nonprojects) questions in Part B (Environmental Elements) that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. September 2018 Page 1 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park A. BACKGROUND gel 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: DLe1W "DaVita Healthcare Office Park" 2. Name of applicant: VIeIW Arthur Richey % DaVta Healthcare Partners, Inc./Team Genesis 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: VLe1W 6245 S Victor Ave Tulsa, OK 74136 918-810-3700 4. Date checklist prepared: DIgIpI November 22, 2017 Revised September 11, 2018 5. Agency requesting checklist: h�j City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): PLeIW Land Use Process Approval Winter 2018 Ground Work and Construction Spring 2019 Completion Summer2020 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. VLe1pJ Yes, there are two phases for this proposal. The first phase includes a full site buildout and a 160,000 SF building. The second phase will come at an undetermined time in the future to include an expansion of the proposed building, up to 200,000 SF. Additionally, a separate Land Use Process will be required and applied for with the City of Federal Way to address the off -site improvements necessaryfor this project on the existing DaVita property. This will be parallel with the current application as fire access proposed through the connection of the two properties. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. BItIpj • Existing Conditions Report by Talasaea, 11/1712017 ■ Tree Inventory/Assessment by Gilles Consulting, 11/1712017 • Geotechnical Report by GeoEngineers, 11113117 • Preliminary technical information report addressing relevance of the 9 Core and 5 Special Requirements of 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual by ESM, 1112212017 September 2018 Page 2 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park • Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance, East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan (Application No. SEP98-0039) from 1999; • Traffic Impact Analysis Memorandum by TenW, 11121117 • Revised Existing Conditions Report prepared by Talasaea, September 2018; • Revised Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) and Level 1 Downstream Storm Drainage Analysis prepared by ESM, September 1018; • Revised Tree Assessment prepared by Brian Gilles of Gilles Consulting, September 2018; a Revised Geotechnical Report prepared by GeoEngineers, September 2018. • Revised Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by TenW, available September or October 2018 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. BILIW The City is currently reviewing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to improve and align S 324th to Weyerhaeuser Way S. This could affect ROW improvements at the south boundary of the subject property. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Vie1W All with the City of Federal Way: - Commercial Grade & Fill, SEPA Threshold Determination, Process 111 Land Use Review. - At Building: Building Permit, Lakehaven Utility District Developer Extension Agreement and Side Sewer Permit. - Boundary Line Adjustment to remove lot lines. —A BLA and LLE were recorded in April 2018 on both subject properties (BLA — rec. no. 20180424900005; LLE rec. no. 20180424000481); - Land Use Process 1 for off -site parking lot improvements; - NPDES Construction Stormwater Discharge Permit; - Forest Practices Class IV -General Application. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Vig1W Construction of approximately 161,280 square feet of new office space for Da Vita Healthcare and 681 parking spaces. This project is subject to the FWCC 1994 code and the Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre Annexation Zoning Agreement (CZA) of 1994. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. VILIW The site is located to the east of the adjacent, existing DaVita Business Office at 32275 32"d Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98001. A site plan has been included with the Land Use Application package. See the Existing Conditions, Sheet EX-01, of the plan set for updated legal descriptions and property lines. Proposed Development. 11.5 acres; King County parcel numbers 215465-0060, -0090, -0110, -0120; within S/T/R: NW 15-21-04 and NE 16-21-04 September 2018 Page 3 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS h�] 1. Earth a. General description of the site hell (underline/circle one): Elay rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? ±15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. h�J The SCS and the 1973 NRCS mapped Alderwood gravelly sandy loan (AgB), derived from glacial till, for the property and vicinity. The USGS has Vashon-age Glacial Till (Qvt) mapped as native geologic materials. Weathered (medium dense) glacial till and unweathered (dense to very dense) glacial till, with generally silty sand with gravel or silty gravel with sand was discovered by GeoResources — refer to the revised Geotechnical Report, September 2018, for more information. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. iel None e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. hf elul The purpose of the site fill and grade activities is to provide an adequate and level surface for the building and parking space. There will be approximately 26,750 cubic yards of cut and 13,500 cubic yards of fill for a net cut quantity of 13,250 cubic yards. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ViLIW Erosion could occur as a result of clearing and construction, particularly if earthwork is completed during periods of rainfall. TESC measures will be implemented as approved by the City prior to construction. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? VLe1W Approximately 75% of the net site area will be covered with impervious surfaces, including parking and the proposed building. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The applicant will institute an erosion control plan to be used during earthwork and construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Jhel September 2018 Page 4 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park Some heavy machinery exhaust and dust particulates generated primarily by construction equipment could result during the development phase of this project. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. h�l None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: VILIW All construction equipment will be in proper working order and regulated for emissions by the manufacturer and local emissions laws. Vehicles entering and leaving the site will also be regulated for emissions by state and local emissions laws. During construction the site will be watered as necessary to keep any dust from impacting surrounding air quality. 3. Water a. Surface Water VLe1W 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. VLe1W There are wetlands on adjacent properties and nearby the site. However, the critical area and their buffers do not encroach onto the subject property. Please refer to the Existing Conditions Report provided by Talasaea. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. iel No work over, in, or adjacent to is proposed in the existing nearby wetlands. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. DjtI4 None proposed. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. h�� Not proposed. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note the location on the site plan. DILIpI 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. BLeIW Not proposed. b. Ground Water September 2018 Page 5 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses, and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hf el Not proposed. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. VLelpJ Not applicable. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. VLelp Stormwater runoff from the site will be treated for enhanced water quality in filter vaults, prior to being discharged to the existing stormwater system that continues to the existing regional detention and water quality pond. The existing pond provides additional basic water quality treatment for both existing and proposed pollution generating areas. No additional water quality monitoring is required by City, County, or State codes. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. hel W Suspended soils and hydrocarbons associated with automobiles may potentially enter the ground waters via storm water. This would be mitigated with water quality facilities installed per City of Federal Way standards. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No - discharge will occur at the natural location. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The project contractors, users, and personnel will utilize onsite Best Management Practices. Attached drainage plans show runoff from the developed site will be directed to the existing regional water quality and detention pond. 4. Plants VLe1W *Please refer to the Existing Conditions report provided by Talasaea a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: thel _X_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other __X_shrubs _ X —grass September 2018 Page 6 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Diglo Native and non-native trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants will be removed during site construction. Please refer to sheet TR-01 and the revised Tree Assessment provided by Gilles Consulting, September 2018, for clarification. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. VitIp No native threatened or endangered plant species were observed or are known to occur on or immediately adjacent to the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. h�l The proposal is to retain 25% of significant trees on site, whether through tree retention or replacement equal to retention rates as required by the City of Federal Way/ FWCC 1994. A 25' landscaping section along the perimeter of the properties fronting a street are included in the plans, with Thigh dense, site obscuring vegetation along the proposed parking lot, using plants approved by the City of Federal Way. A 5' wide Type 111 Visual Screen landscaping is used along property lines adjacent to other properties. Refer to sheets TR-01, LA-01 and LA-02 for more information. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Himalayan and evergreen blackberry, English ivy, English holly, creeping buttercup, Scot's broom 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site, or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: Jhel birds: hawk, songbirds, common crow other. mammals: rabbits s uirrels fish: no fish inhabit the site b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. h�� No listed species are known to occur on or near the Site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. ftlo The entire region is known to be part of the Pacific Flyway. The Pacific Flyway includes Alaska and the Aleutian Islands and the Rocky Mountains and Pacific coast regions of Canada, the United States and Mexico, and south to where the Pacific Flyway becomes blended with other flyways in Central and South America. However, the site is not known to be used by migratoryfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. DLeIW The proposed landscaping and vegetation retention for the project will help enhance natural features and provide small wildlife habitat, such as for birds or insects. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. Bullfrog, large -mouthed bass in North Lake. September 2018 Page 7 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. iel Electrical energy will be the primary source of power serving the project. Natural gas maybe used to satisfy incidental energy needs. Solar power may be used if available. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. BLe1W No, the proposed building height is at 57.5'ABE. This proposed height is allowed by increasing building setbacks from property lines. No existing development utilizes solar energy in proximity to which the shadow cast from the building has any effect. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. hel nee pions ,.i._&2.1 _•'its' the L GP4 �4e appUeag:c;:. Energy conservation will be addressed in the building permit documents. Approximately 5% of the parking stalls will be reserved for electrical vehicles and provide EV charging infrastructure. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. iel None known. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. Litter from trespassers is the only known contamination associated with this site. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. None known. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. None known. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Emergency medical and 911 services may be required, along with typical fire and police services. Special services are not anticipated. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. September 2018 Page 8 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park State regulations regarding safety and the handling of hazardous materials will be followed during the construction process. Equipment refueling areas would be located in areas where spill could be quickly contained and where the risk of hazardous materials entering surface water is minimized. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? VLe1W The primary source of noise near the project site is from vehicular traffic along Weyerhaeuser Way S, S 320'h St and Interstate-5. It is not anticipated to materially impact the proposed project in any way. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. iel Short-term impacts would result from the use of construction equipment during the site development. Construction would occur during permitted construction hours and always in compliance with the City of Federal Way noise regulations. Long-term impacts would be those vehicular trips associated with office space. Noise generated from the proposed office operations is not expected to impact surrounding properties. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: VLe1W Construction activity will be limited to permitted construction hours and construction equipment will not be allowed to idle for continuous periods of time, which will help mitigate the impacts of potential construction noise. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Jhel The site is currently vacant. The site is bordered to the east with Storm pond (south), to the west is the primary/original DaVita Healthcare office facilities, to the north are mixed uses, and to the east is mixed uses. The proposal is an approved use for the zone and will not affect current land uses of nearby properties. b. Has the project site been used as worldng farmlands or worldng forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? Jhel No 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding worldng farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how. No impact. c. Describe any structures on the site. hel None. The site is currently vacant. September 2018 Page 9 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Viglo No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Office Park 1; OP-1 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? VLelp Office Park g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h�pl Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. iel No critical areas are on the site. Please refer to the Existing Conditions Report provided by Talasaea. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? VidW Approximately 800-900 people will work at the completed project (post the phase 2 extension to 200,000 SF) with varying shifts throughout the days and weeks. Approximately 640-720 people will work in the completed project within the 161,280 SF building proposed for phase 1. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? DLelpj None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. Je1W Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. VLe1W The project will be developed in accordance with applicable City of Federal Way development and land use codes to ensure the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and applicable Development Regulations. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any. None proposed. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. iel None. September 2018 Page 10 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Vidpl None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. el Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? hLe1 W The tallest height at the top of the proposed building parapet proposed is 5Z5' ABE grade. The principal exterior building materials will include an aluminum window system with low emissivity glazing, prefinished metal panels, painted concrete and/or brick veneer. Please see Building Elevations and Design Intent provided by McGranahan. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? VLe1W No views will be altered by this development. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. ViiLIW Significant trees will be retained to the extent possible. Newly landscaped areas will be planted to screen areas and blend in with the existing adjacent development. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? V14L1W Parking lot lighting would occur dusk through dawn at completed project. Minimal glare would occur from sunlight reflected off parked cars. Additionally, the headlights of traveling vehicles would occur any time of day. Some glare may be produced by the reflective glass windows during the early morning and late afternoon periods of sunshine but would be retained on site. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? DLeIW No, not with the landscaping and setbacks included in the plan. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? hel None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. The principal exterior building materials will help to reduce light and glare impacts. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? VLe1W September 2018 Page 11 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park Private pedestrian trails meander throughout the adjacent Weyerhaeuser property. it is the intent of DaVita to provide pedestrian connectivity through the proposed campus (with connection to the existing DaVita office building). The proposal includes non -motorized paths around campus for employees and visitors of the site, and a pedestrian easement on the eastern edge of the southern property for connection to the future S 324th Street. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. V1g1W Me c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. DILIW Pedestrian access through campus is proposed for the project site. Other measures are not proposed. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. hf elp] Adjacent to the south of the site, the Weyerhaeuser Technology Center was constructed in 1978 and the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters was constructed in 1969, which makes it 47 years old. Pursuant to CFR 36, Chapter I, subsection 60.4 criteria for evaluation, the Weyerhaeuser Headquarters building may be eligible. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. JhelpJ No known landmarks or evidence have been observed on or near the site. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. hf elp The methods used to assess the potential impacts included GIS data analysis and WISAARD GIS data review. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. If any such historic or cultural evidence is encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work will be halted in the area and a state -approved archeologist/historian will be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. gel September 2018 Page 12 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park S 320th St and Weyerhaeuser Way serve the East Campus Corporate Park 1. Through streets, S 323'd St and 32"d Ave S will provide direct access to the proposed developed site in this project. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? DLelpj Yes, the site is serviced by Pierce County Transit route 501 with 1 stop along the property frontage on Weyerhaeuser Way S. Metro Transit route 181 serves along S 320th St. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? "el The final project will result in a total of approximately 681 outdoor parking stalls, with 470 stalls provided on the north parking lot and 211 stalls proposed on the southern building property. This allows for the minimum count of 667 parking stalls to be provided should the future building expansion occur. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle, or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). h� elp] Right-of-way dedication of 9' along the property frontages on 32"d Ave S and S 323'd Street will be made to the City of Federal Way. The existing roundabout will be modified to accommodate adequate sight distance and pedestrian crossings at the north and east splitter islands. A 20' pedestrian path easement located along the east property line of the southern lot will be used for future pedestrian connectivity. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. 1el Not expected. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? hf elf] The new office space of about 161,280 square feet is anticipated to generate 1,879 new daily trips. It is estimated that the proposed development will create 290 new AM pear hour trips and 281 new PM peak hour trips. The trip generation estimates are based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 91 Edition, ITE Code Single Tenant Office Bldg 715. See the Revised TIA provided by Ten W for more information. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. Not expected. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. PLel Traffic impacts (off -site) associated with this project were considered and appropriately mitigated under the Threshold Determination for the East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan (BSP). Traffic impact fees will be paid accordingly. September 2018 Page 13 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. VLe1W The completed office facilities would result in a slight, increased need for public services to include fire protection, police protection, and health care. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. DLelpj The increased demand will be offset by impact fees, levies, and taxes required to be paid by the applicant as part of this development. Also the proposal has been designed in a manner that will provide adequate access for fire, medic, and police vehicles. Police protection needs will be minimized by the employment of private security monitoring systems. Business and property taxes generated by the proposed office space should be sufficient to offset any increases in public service needs. 16. Utilities a. Underline/circle utilities currently available at the site: gel electricity,natural gas, water, refuse service telephone, sanitary sewer septic system, other The above listed utilities are either available on -site or will be extended as necessary to serve the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. DLelpj Lakehaven Utility District will provide water and sewer connection. Puget Sound Energy will supply electricity and gas Telephone: Century Link, Verizon, Comcast Fire Protection: South King Fire & Rescue C. SIGNATURE HELP The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: I Printed Name of Signee: Position and Agency/Organization: �IGC I Date Submitted: " I L ! September 2018 Page 14 of 14 DaVita Healthcare Office Park CITY OF �. Federal Allay Cen,1`ered on, Opportunity September 10, 2018 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8th Ave South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 eric.labrier3a esmcivil.com Re: Files #17-105642-UP & #17-105643-SE; NOTICE OF PENDING EXPIRATION DaVita Healthcare Office Park, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor Our records indicate that on April 10, 2018, a technical review letter was sent to you pertaining to Use Process Application #17-105642-UP and SEPA file #17-105643-SE for the DaVita project. On March 23, 2018, April 19, 2018, May 25, 2018, and July 17, 2018, you requested extensions for processing SEPA. The most recent request was for a 90-day extension, which ends on October 16, 2018. Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.050(1) states that if an applicant does not provide additional information to the'city within 180 days of being notified by mail that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. This letter serves as a reminder that no resubmittal has been received in response to the above listed technical review letter (copy enclosed). The closing paragraph of the April 10, 2018, letter contains information regarding FWRC 19.15.050. With regard to the application, per FWRC 19.15.050.2, no less than 30 days prior to the lapse of the 180- day notification by the city, the applicant may submit a written request in the form of a letter with supporting evidence to the department requesting an extension of the time limits and document the following: (a) That circumstances beyond the applicant's control prevent compliance with the time limits; (b) That the applicant is making substantial progress in responding to the request for information so that review of the application can be furthered when that information is submitted; and (c) The number of additional calendar days necessary to provide the requested information. Per FWRC 19.15.050.3, the Community Development Director is authorized to review requests for extensions to the 180-day time limit and decide upon them based on responses to the above listed criteria. Requests for extensions can be submitted to the City of Federal Way Permit Center (pert-Eitcenter@cityoffederalway.com, 253-835-2607, 33325 81E' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003) Mr. LaBrie September 10, 2018 Page 2 along with a Resubmittal Form. If you do not turn in a project resubmittal or request an extension for these applications, they will become null and void on October 7, 2018. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at stacev.welsh(g7cityoffederalway.com, or253-835-2634. Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner enc: Technical Review Letter, April 10, 2018 Resubmittal Information Form o: Brian Davis, Community Development Director, via email Robert "Doc' Hansen, Planning Manager, via email Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, via email Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue, via email Arthur Richey, Arthur.Richey @davita.com Savanna Nagorski, Savanna.Norski esmeiv'I.00m 17-105642-00-UP Doc. I.D. 78245 Stacey Welsh From: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 7:22 AM To: Stacey Welsh Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Good morning Stacey, We met with DaVita last Friday and received direction to move forward with a slightly reconfigured building design. In brief, they are phasing the building (160,000 sf in phase 1 and another 40,000 sf in phase 2). We have begun revising the plans and SEPA checklist and anticipate getting a submittal back to the City in about 3 weeks. With this new direction, please extend the SEPA deadline another 90 days. Thank you very much, ERIC LABRIE, A. .C.P. ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC mm. smcivil.com From: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Welsh@cityoffederalway.com> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 4:52 PM To: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Eric, We are coming up to the FWRC 14.10.020(6) SEPA threshold determination deadline for the 60 day extension provided for the DaVita project. Please request an extension as staff has provided a technical comment letter with items that will need to be addressed before a threshold determination can be made on this project. Also what is the status on the project resubmittal in response to the April 10, 2018 technical comment letter? Thank you, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner ,A Federal Way 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone: 253/835-2634 www.cit offederalwa .com From: Stacey Welsh Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 11:19 AM To: 'Eric LaBrie' Cc: Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney; Savanna Nagorski Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Stacey Welsh From: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 10:29 AM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney; Savanna Nagorski Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Hi Stacey, Please accept this email as our request to extend for another 60 days. Thank you, ERIC LABRIE, A. .C.P. ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC www.esmcivii.com From: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Welsh cityaffederalway.com> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 1:24 PM To: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie esmcivil.com> Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Eric, We are coming up to the FWRC 14.10.020(6) SEPA threshold determination deadline for the 30 day extension provided for the DaVita project. Please request an extension as staff has provided a technical comment letter with items that will need to be addressed before a threshold determination can be made on this project. Thank you. Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner Federal Way 33325 8"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2634 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.co From: Stacey Welsh Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 8:34 AM To: 'Eric LaBrie' Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Eric, This email will suffice. Thank you, Stacey Welsh, AICP Stacey Welsh From: Courtney Kaylor <courtney@mhseattle.com> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2018 3:29 PM To: Stacey Welsh Subject: DaVita Healthcare Office Park Ms. Welsh — I request a copy of the decision for the DaVita Healthcare Office Park (file #17-105642-UP) under FWMC section 19.65.100(5). 1 also request notice of the SEPA threshold decision for this project under FWMC 14.10.040(1). Thank you, Courtney Kaylor Partner Ili(:CLTj-L 3l.l(lli AII.d. J1ltl' I' 701 FII'TH AVENUE, SUI'M- 6600 SEATrLE, WA 98104 TEL: 206.812.3388 DIRECT: 206.812-3379 FAX: 206.812.3389 c •r ) 'h' N! ca)Nf! :.cr.7a IC IX 11.i1•I� itii�: • . .I'.(:[ 1.11 NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. Stacey Welsh From: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie@esmcivil.com> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 7:57 AM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney; Savanna Nagorski Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Good morning Stacey, DaVita has agreed to another 30-day extension and we have begun to address the comments provided. We will likely be following up with individual reviewers for clarification on some of the comments and expect to resubmit in approximately 30-45 days. Please let me know if you need an actual letter, or if this correspondence will suffice. Thanks, ERIC LABRIE, A.I.C.P. ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC www.esmcivil.com From: Stacey Welsh <Stace .Welsh cit offederalwa .com> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 11:32 AM To: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie esmcivil_com> Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Eric, We are coming up to the FWRC 14.10.020(6) SEPA threshold determination deadline for the 30 day extension provided for the above -referenced project. Please request an extension as staff recently provided a technical comment letter with items that will need to be addressed before a threshold determination can be made on this project. Thank you. Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner Federal Way ti Mltl/ld CA 6Sa• •,••ry 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2634 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com From: Stacey Welsh Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 10:38 AM To: 'Eric LaBrie' Subject: DaVita SEPA Eric, Regarding DaVita, pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code Section 14.10.020(6): "Within 90 days of issuing a letter of completeness for the application and environmental checklist, the responsible official shall make a threshold determination or notify the applicant that a determination of significance is likely and indicate the areas of likely impact. The applicant may request an additional 30 days for the issuance of the threshold determination by the responsible official, or for the responsible official to evaluate mitigation measures proposed by the applicant. The responsible official shall grant such extension, if requested. A final determination shall be made within 90 days from the receipt of the applicant's response for additional information, unless the applicant requests an additional 30 days as provided in this section." The letter of completeness for this project was issued on December 20, 2017. Technical review is underway at this time, and the city does not have all the information necessary to make a SEPA threshold determination. Therefore, the City asks that you submit a written request to place the SEPA threshold determination on hold. Thank you, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2634 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com CITY OF t Federal Way April 10, 2018 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 cric.labrie Cr esm .gom Re: Files #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE; TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS DaVita Healthcare Office Park, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor FILE City departments/divisions have the following comments in response to your November 22, 2017, and December 8, 2017, submittals. This proposal is subject to the provisions of the 1994 Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Development Agreement (CZA), and Office Park Zone (OP-1) zoning regulations in effect on August 23, 1994. Any procedural requirements must meet today's codes (Federal Way Revised Code [FWRCI Title 19). Some comments provided herein are required and some are informative, while others may be applicable during future steps of the project. Comments in this letter need to be addressed prior to issuance of a SEPA threshold determination and land use application decision, or as otherwise noted. Questions regarding technical revimv comments should be addressed to the referenced staff representative. Stacey Welsh — Planning Division, (253) 835-2634, sta. eve welsh@ciiyofFederaiway.com 1. General— Technical comments made about an item on one sheet may necessitate changes to other related sheets and related documents. It is the applicant's responsibility to determine any such necessary adjustments. Please ensure consistent inEorrnation is communicated throughout the plan set and associated application materials. 2. Comprehensive Plan— The project is dependent on a proposed comprehensive plan amendment. USE PROCESS III 3. Plan Set— Please address the following comments: a. On Sheet ST-01 under the Project Statistics section, no "net site area" is provided. The Use Process III Submittal Requirements handout states: "Provide net site area, which is gross area minus critical areas, rights -of -way, private open space, and public purpose lands." b. On Sheet ST-01 show the building setbacks froze property lines to demonstrate compliance with Federal Wray 0ti, Code (FWCC) 22-826(1)(b), whereby a building can exceed 35 feet in height if each required yard abutting the structure is increased one -foot for each one -foot the structure exceeds 35 feet above average building elevation. c. On Sheet LA-01: Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 2 of 9 April 10, 2018 i. Demonstrate compliance with FWCC 22-826(3), which states the first 25 feet of the required front yard, starting from the street, must be landscaped and contain a three-foot high berm or three-foot high dense, sight obscuring vegetation. This vegetated area must run the entire length of the required front yard (except for driveway locations). ii. There is a note in Tract C which states, "maintain existing vegetation surrounding stormwater pond to maximum extent possible". Clarify this statement, as Tract C is not part of the submitted project and no work should occur there. E, Isabel the size of the parking lot landscape islands. d. !'Reconcile Sheets LA-01 and TR-01; Sheet LA-01 should only show existing trees that will remain after development. e. Confirm correct sections of the CZA and FWCC are used by providing CZA and code citations on Sheets LA-01 and LA-02, as they pertain to the notes listed on the plans. f. Update sheets as appropriate to reflect the proposed parking lot Boundary Line Adjustment (city file 18-100789-00-SU) and building site Lot Line Elimination (city file 18-100790-00-SU). 4. Elevations— Please address the following comments: a. Provide information that demonstrates how the average building elevation (ABE) and building height were calculated (see enclosed ABE definition, which was also provided with the Preapplication Summary Letter). In addition, address ABE in relation to plan sheet GR-02 (site cross sections). Also see comment #17, below. b. In the September 18, 2017, Preapplication Conference Summary Letter, one of the comments requested the submittal to provide details on location and screening for trash receptacles, ground mounted mechanical equipment, and rooftop mechanical equipment. i. No details regarding the trash enclosure were provided. 1. Per FWCC 22-1564(d), all trash enclosures shall be screened from abutting properties and/or public rights of way by a 100 percent sight -obscuring fence or wall and appropriate landscape screen. 2. Per FWCC 22-1564(b), all outside storage areas shall be fully screened by Type I landscaping a minimum of five feet in width, as described in section 22-1565(a), unless determined by the community development review committee (CDRC) that such screening is not necessary because stored materials are not visually obtrusive. 3. Per FWCC 22-1565(a)(1), Type I landscaping is intended to provide a solid sight barrier to totally separate incompatible land uses. This landscaping is typically found between residential and incompatible nonresidential land use zones (i.e. manufacturing park and city center or residential, etc.), and around outdoor storage yards, service yards, loading areas, mechanical or electrical equipment, utility installations, trash receptacles, etc. ii. The elevation drawings provide detail on the location of mechanical units and daylight monitors on the roof, but insufficient screening detail/explanation. Will all the equipment be fully or partially screened and with what type of material? 1. Per FWCC 22-960(a), vents, mechanical penthouses, elevator equipment, and similar appurtenances that extend above the roofline must be surrounded by a solid sight -obscuring screen that meets the following criteria: (a) The screen must be integrated into the architecture of the building. (b) The screen must obscure the view of the appurtenances from adjacent streets and properties. 17-105642-00-UP Doc. 4D. 77285 Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 3 of 9 April 10, 2018 c. Clarify the dark grey and neon green areas that the building appears to be sitting on. This is shown on all four elevations. If these are platforms or retaining walls, provide additional details on purpose, height, type of material, etc. d. It is difficult to determine compliance with FWCC Section 22-1564(u) (screening of blank walls) with the scale used on the elevations drawings. Have the architect confirm compliance with the standard relating to blank wall areas greater than 240 square feet in area. 5. Pedestrian Path Please address the following comments: a. The November 22, 2017, letter from McGranahan Architects describes a 12-foot non -motorized trail to be added along the east edge of the building site terminating at the southern edge of the property. Sheet ST-01 shows a 10-foot path that terminates approximately 60 feet north of the southern property line. Clarify what is proposed and update submitted materials accordingly. b. For functionality and safety purposes, address pedestrian connectivity across the parking lot site in both the north/south and east/west directions. Surrounding developments have implemented this feature in their site design. 6. Site Photos No dates are provided on the photos for reference. Were pictures taken before or after the underbrush clearing reviewed under city file 17-104447-00-AD? If the photos were taken before, then photos submitted do not accurately reflect the project site. Parking Please address the following comments: a. The amount of proposed parking varies throughout the submitted application documents, with the highest number being 724 stalls as listed in the TIA. The site plan states 706 stalls, but a count of stalls actually drawn on the plan (along with 150 basement stalls) totals 688. Clarify and correct all affected documents. For reference, the Notice of Application lists 706 stalls, as that is what is stated on the site plan. b. As requested in the September 18, 2017, preapplication letter, since parking is proposed on an adjoining lot, provide documentation in compliance with FWCC Section 22-1421(a)(2)(b). Off -Site Improvements— The November 22, 2017, letter from McGranahan Architects describes pedestrian links with the existing DaVita building to the west will be reinforced by re -working existing planter islands to provide clear and direct connections between primary building entries and outdoor seating areas. These are off -site improvements that are not being reviewed or approved as part of this Use Process III land use application. That off -site work requires its own use process land use application. The thresholds to determine which land use application is required are contained within FWRC 19,15.030. 9. Wetlands— Please address the following comments: a. Review and address the enclosed February 22, 2018, letter from the city's wetland consultant, ESA. b. Figure 3 of the November 17, 2017, critical areas report prepared by Talasaea identifies Wetland FA as an existing wetland. However, the report text explains that it is not a wetland. For clarity, add a note on Figure 3 that clarifies the situation. c. No photographs of the site and critical areas or documentation of fieldwork, including field data sheets and rating system forms, were provided for the assessments of Wetlands FA and FB (see FWRC 19.145.080[2] and 19.145.410[2]). 10. Sigtzifi mt Trees — Please address the following comments: a. Tree evaluation report (prepared by Gilles Consulting, November 20, 2017): On page 3, under the Executive Summary, the "species" bulleted item needs correction, as the percentages shown exceed 100, and the number of trees discussed exceeds 406 (331+80=411). 17-105642-00-UP Doc I.D. 77285 iVir. Eric LaBrie Page 4of9 April 10, 2018 ii. On page 4, the tree tag numbering description does not account for some of the tree numbers listed on plan set Sheet TR-01 (trees 7-21), clarify and update documents as necessary. iii. Attachment 1 should either show or refer to plan set Sheet TR-01, as they communicate different pieces of information. iv. Street trees are included in the tree evaluation (Attachment 2). Either clarify why these should be included for a tree count on private property, or remove street trees from the report. v. Attachment 4 lists tree protection measures, including signage. The proposed text advises that Federal Way Code Compliance should be contacted with any concerns. This contact should be revised to the list the site superintendent's contact information, as this would be an active construction site under their direct supervision. vi. FWCC Section 22-1568(c)(6), "Significant Trees," describes management practices that shall be observed on sites containing significant trees to provide protection. Without code citations or an explanation that the contents of Attachment 4 meet the (f) alternative protection methods in code, it is not clear that these measures have been incorporated. b. Sheet TR-01: i. Street trees are included in the tree evaluation report. Clarify why these should be included for a tree count on private property, or remove street trees from the sheet. ii. The sheet shows 46 significant trees on the property, and none are shown anywhere development will occur. The tree evaluation report lists 209 significant trees (out of 406 trees on the property). Revise this sheet to match the tree report and to comply with FWCC requirements for significant trees. iii. If development will require the removal of more than 75 percent of the significant trees on -site, significant trees are required to be replaced in an amount equal to 25 percent of the significant trees that existed on the subject property prior to commencing any development activity pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(c)(1)(a). Please show how this criterion is met. iv. After the Lot Line Elimination and Boundary Line Adjustment are completed, the four existing lots will be reduced to three. Each property must comply with the significant tree code requirements. When the calculation of significant trees is completed, the three properties should not be aggregated, each must stand on its own to meet code requirements pertaining to significant trees. 11. Forest Practices — A Forest Practices Class IV -General Application is required if more than 5,000 board feet of merchantable timber will be harvested from the property in conjunction with the development activity. The city will review the proposed Class IV -General Forest Practices in conjunction with SEPA review, and review of associated development permits or approvals. 12. Geotechnical Report— In Appendix A of the November 13, 2017, report prepared by GeoEngineers, amounts of proposed cut and fill for the project are indicated. The amounts listed differ from those provided on the submitted clearing and grading plan set Sheet GR-01 and SEPA Checklist Item #1.e. Clarify what is proposed and update materials accordingly. 13. TIR— The geotechnical report indicates the project area is Vashon till (Qvt). The "Project Overview" section of the TIR refers to the geotechnical report and TIR Figure 1.4 for further information. Figure 1.4 sourced from the NRCS says it is Alderwood gravelly sandy loam (AgB). Please clarify. 14. Use Process III Decisional Criteria — Provide a narrative demonstrating how the proposal satisfies FWRC 19.65.100.2. You are encouraged to provide the same for the CZA. 17-105642-00-UP Doo LD. 77265 Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 5 of 9 April 10, 2018 15. Burden of Proof— In this letter, staff members have identified items that require the provision of additional information for review. During the Notice of Application comment period, the city received one public comment letter, which was provided to you on January 30, 2018. Review and address the comments to support your project. Per FWRC 19.65.080: 19.65.080, "Burden of Proof' "The applicant has the responsibility of convincing the director that, under the provisions of this chapter, the applicant is entitled to the requested decision." SEPA CHECKLIST 16. ApprovalslPermits—An NPDES Construction Stormwater Discharge Permit and Forest Practices Class IV -General Application may be required for the project (checklist item #10). 17. Plants The checklist describes buffer enhancement with native trees and shrubs to be done as appropriate. Clarify what this refers to (checklist items #4.b and #5.d). 18. Height— The checklist notes that proposed building height will not exceed 42.5 feet above grade. The submitted elevation drawings show 48.5 feet at the top of parapet, please clarify (checklist items #6.b and #10.a). Also see comment #3(a), above. 19. Transportation — Review the Public Works review comments below, and revise the SEPA checklist and site plan as necessary to ensure accurate information is included. Kevin Peterson — Public Works Development Services Division, (253) 835-2734, kevin.peterson@ciVqfEederalwgy.com ENGINEERING PLANS 20. The project needs to be served with solid waste and recycling facilities, per FWRC 19.125.150. The plans need to depict how this will be accomplished. 21. Show property and right-of-way lines on the Section views on sheet GR-01. 22. Identify and provide a dimension for the width of property to be dedicated for right-of-way. 23. Final engineering plans (for the building permit) will need to be on 24" x36" (or 22" x34") paper, and the scale shall be 1"=20'. TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT 24. There are references to King County mapping and other materials. These references need to be revised to indicate city mapping and reference material, for those materials that the city has available. 25. The downstream drainage analysis needs to be described, and include an "Off -site Analysis Drainage System Table," per Reference 8-B of the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDIvl). 26. Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment is required for this project. The engineer states (under the Conditions and Requirements Summary) that water quality treatment for this project willbe provided in the existing "regional" pond. It is also stated (under Section 4. Flow Control & Water Quality Facility Analysis and Design), that the water quality standard can be reduced to Basic, if certain criteria are met. While the existing pond likely does meet the Basic Water Quality Treatment criteria, it is unlikely that the first criteria to reduce treatment to the Basic menu can be met, as it is very likely that one or more of the treatment 17-105642-00-UP D- I.D. 77283 Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 6 of 9 April 10, 2018 options for Enhanced Basic can be provided on the project site. Additionally, the city will accept Enhanced Basic treatment facilities not identified in the KCSWDM, as long as those facilities have achieved G.U.L.D. status under the Washington State Department of Ecology guidelines. 27. The project is subject to the Conservation Flow Control standard. Since the existing detention pond was sized based on an older design standard and different analysis requirements, the existing stormwater pond may or may not have adequate capacity and/or outflow release rates for this project. There is no direct correlation between the old and new pond sizing criteria; however, based on our consultations with King County SWDM engineers, the following has been determined to be the appropriate approach in determining the flow control requirement for this project: a. Analyze the DaVita project utilizing the Level 1 Flow Control standard, and determine the required pond volume under that standard; b. Analyze the DaVita project utilizing the Level 3 Flow Control standard, and determine the required pond volume under that standard; c. The difference in volumes between the Level 1 and Level 3 Flow Control Standards is the volume that the DaVita project needs to provide, either on -site, OR, the existing pond can be modified to provide the required volume. 28. Some form of Flow Control BMP is required. If any type of BMP is proposed that requires infiltration, then infiltration testing shall be performed in the appropriate location(s). Sarady Long — Public Works Traffic Division (253) 835-2743, sarad .ton ci offederalwa .com 29. The Public Works Traffic Division has finished its review of the submitted materials. The following technical review items must be addressed prior to Public Works approval. Please note, these comments did not include comments from WSDOT. Traffic related comments/concerns by WSDOT must be addressed and approved by WSDOT. PLANS COMMENTS 30. The civil plans must depict the correct frontage improvement and right-of-way dedication along 32nd Avenue South and South 323Ld Street. 31. The splitter island on the north leg of the roundabout should be modified to accommodate a pedestrian crossing. 32. Show conceptual street lighting along the property frontage on 323=d Avenue South, 32nd Avenue South, and Weyerhaeuser Way South on the plans. Detailed design is not required at this time. Please note, the existing street lights will need to be upgraded to LED and shall meet current street light standards. 33. Provide rights -of -way dimensions on the plan. 34. The north -south 20-foot pedestrian path between South 3231d Street and the future road South 324th Street extension should be relocated to the west side of the property and should be extended the entire length of the property. 35. Accessible pedestrian path/connection should be provided within the internal parking lot and from the parking lot to the crossing at the roundabout. TIA REVIEW COMMENTS 36. The city concurs with using the Transportation Engineer (ITE) Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition LUC 715 (Single Tennant Office Building) to estimate the trip generation for the development. 17-105642-00-UP Doc LD. 77285 Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 7of9 April 10, 2018 37. The proposal to apply a four percent annual traffic growth rate to the existing counts to estimate horizon year volume is acceptable. Please note, typically the xity uses a two percent annual growth rate. 38. The TIA should also address safe pedestrian access from the parking lot to the building. In addition to modifying the splitter island for accommodate pedestrian, RRFBs should be incorporated to increase pedestrian safety. 39. Update the TLA to include AM peak hour study intersections impacted by 100 or more AM peak hour project trips. These intersections were confirmed via email on October 23, 2017. 40. On page 21, of the 2019 Without -Project AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume, the 2019 trips for AM and PM peak hours are not correctly depicted. 41. The city has reviewed and concurs that all proposed site access locations are anticipated to meet the adopted LOS standards. Please include AM peak hour study intersections LOS. 42. Forward the updated TEA to WSDOT for technical review comments. SEPA CHECKLIST — TRANSPORTATION 43. Transportation i 4(c) — Revise this section to including the following improvements: a. Install planter strips, sidewalks, street lights, and right-of-way dedication on 32nd Avenue South and South 323,d Street. b. Modify the roundabout to accommodate pedestrian crossing and adequate sight distance. c. Provide a 20-foot pedestrian connection between South 323�d Street and the future South 3241h Street extension. 44. Transportation 14(g) — A transportation impact fee has not been paid by this development. However, traffic impacts (off -site) associated with this project were considered and appropriately mitigated under the Threshold Determination for the East Campus Parcel 1 Binding Site Plan (BSP). Revise this section accordingly. Brian Asbury — Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, (253) 946-5407, bash Wcehaven. r 45. The applicant has completed and submitted to Lakehaven an application for Certificates of Availability, and Lakehaven issued these certificates on November 9, 2017. 46. The applicant will need to submit an application for either a Developer Pre -Design Meeting or Developer Extension Agreement for Lakehaven to formally commence the water and/or sewer plan review process. Lakehaven encourages owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. Chris Cahan — South King Fire & Rescue, (253) 946-7243, Chris.calian(a�.southkingffiute.org WATER SUPPLY 47. The required fire flow for this project is 4000 gallons per minute. A Certificate of WaterAvailability, including a hydraulic fire flow model, shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of building permit application. 17-105642-00-UP Doc. LD. 77285 Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 8 of 9 April 10, 2018 FIRE HYDRANTS 48. This project will require four fire hydrant(s) in approved* locations. There are two existing fire hydrants on public streets that are available for this project. There will be at least two additional fire hydrants required within the complex. 49. Existing fire hydrants on adjacent properties shall not be considered unless fire apparatus access roads extending between properties and easements are established to prevent obstructions of such roads. 50. *Hydrant spacing along access roads and location in relationship to buildings and sprinkler FDC shall be approved by Fire Marshal's Office. 51. Fire hydrants shall be in service prior to and during the time of construction. EMERGENCY ACCESS 52. Fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all requirements of Fire Access Policy 10.006 (enclosed). 53. The angles of approach, departure, and minimum ground clearance were not defined on this proposal. 54. Designated and marked fire lanes may be required for emergency access. This may be done during the plans check or prior to building final. Requirements and marking options can be found in Title 8 of the FWRC: htW://www.codWu g.camlL}UA1Federal RyL. 55. Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. VEHICLE ACCESS GATES 56. All vehicle access gates shall comply with the gate policy (contact SKFR for updated policy). FIRE DEPARTMENT LOCK BOX 57. A mcersed fire department "Knox" brand key box shall be installed on the building near the front entrance. Location(s) will be approved by the plan reviewer or Deputy Fire Marshal onsite. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM 58. An NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system is required. 59. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies where the total floor area included within the surrounding exterior walls on all floor levels, including basements, exceeds 5,000 square feet. Fire walls shall not be considered to separate a building to enable deletion of the required automatic fire - extinguishing system. 60. The system demand pressure (to the source) required in a hydraulically designed automatic fire sprinkler system shall be at least 10 percent less than the correlative water supply curve pressure. FIRE ALARM 61. Afire alarm system is required 62. City code requires an automatic fire detection system in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area. The fire alarm system is required to monitor the sprinkler system including water flow. Provide full notification as required by NFPA 72. Complete coverage smoke detection is not required for this prajesz This fire detection system shall be monitored by an approved central and/or remote station. 17-105642-00-uP Doa I.D. 77285 Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 9of9 April 10, 2018 EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COVERAGE 63. All buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based upon the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication system at the exterior of the building. Exception: if the building is less than 35 feet in height as defined in the building code. CLOSING Please be aware that this review does not preclude the city from requesting additional information related to any of the topics discussed above. Please submit revised application materials as appropriate, accompanied by the completed "Resubmittal Information Form" (enclosed). Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at stacev.welsh car ritvoffederahway.c m, or 253 835-2634. Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner enc: ABE Definition February 22, 2018, Memo from ESA Fire Access Policy Resubmittal Information Form c: Brian Davis, Community Development Director Robert "Doc" Hansen, Planning Manager Jim Harris, Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Felix Pahsoc, WSDOT, PAli4oPC[r).�Esciot.w>}. �v Arthur Richey, arthue..richry@clavita.corn Savanna Nagorslci, Savanna -?+lay ors iCalesmci<<il.cnm 17-105642-00-UP Dom LD. 77285 Stacey Welsh From: Savanna Nagorski <Savanna.Nagorski@esmciviLcom> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 10:37 AM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Eric LaBrie; Arthur Richey; Mark Kinney; Laura Bartenhagen; todd.olson@mcgranahan.com; marc.gleason@mcgranahan.com Subject: RE: DaVita SEPA Good morning Stacey, Please see below. The applicant would like to request a 30-day extension for the City of Federal Way to issue a SEPA Threshold Determination for file # 17-105643-SE that was submitted November 22, 2017. In light of the extension and to allow for ESM and DaVita to snake efficient improvements to the submittal items for approval, we would like to also request that the City of Federal Way release comments from City staff that are available at the time of this request, provided that a full consolidated Technical Review letter is still presented to the applicant. Please also provide the current third -party review results from the authorized wetland consultant if available. Thank you for your attention to this project and requests. Savanna Nagorski, MS SM Consulting Engineers, LLC www.esmdYILcom From: Eric LaBrie Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:56 PM To: Savanna Nagorski <Savanna.Na-orski esmcivil.com> Subject: FW: DaVita SEPA Hi Savanna, I anticipate that Arthur will call tomorrow to authorize a 30-day extension as requested below. When he does, please reply to Stacey's message authorizing the 30-day extension and ask if the City will release whatever comments they have to date with the understanding that they do not replace the consolidated review letter. It would be very helpful for us to begin to address comments as soon as possible since they will want to submit an early clear and grade upon SEPA issuance. Feel free to call me tomorrow if you have questions. Thanks, E x ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC V^VW,gSMdVi1.11 From: Stacey Welsh <Stacey.Welsh cityoffederalwaycom> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 10:38 AM To: Eric LaBrie <eric.labrie esmcivil.com> Subject: DaVita SEPA Eric, Regarding DaVita, pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code Section 14.10.020(6): "Within 90 days of issuing a letter of completeness for the application and environmental checklist, the responsible official shall make a threshold determination or notify the applicant that a determination of significance is likely and indicate the areas of likely impact. The applicant may request an additional 30 days for the issuance of the threshold determination by the responsible official, or for the responsible official to evaluate mitigation measures proposed by the applicant. The responsible official shall grant such extension, if requested. A final determination shall be made within 90 days from the receipt of the applicant's response for additional information, unless the applicant requests an additional 30 days as provided in this section." The letter of completeness for this project was issued on December 20, 2017. Technical review is underway at this time, and the city does not have all the information necessary to make a SEPA threshold determination. Therefore, the City asks that you submit a written request to place the SEPA threshold determination on hold. Thank you, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner Fecjeraf Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2634 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cit offederalwa .com FILE CITY OF L Federal Way December 20, 2017 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers LLC 33400 8t[' Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityofiederalway. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor eric.labrie esmcivil.co:n Re: Files #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION DaVita Healthcare Office Park, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: The Community Development Department is in receipt of your November 22, 2017, and December 8, 2017, project submittals. Your proposed project includes construction of a 200,000 square -foot office building and additional parking. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence a formal Letter of Complete Application. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (F),VRC) 19.15.045 and 14.10.020, the application is deemed complete as of the date of this letter. The complete application determination is based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set forth in FWRC 19.15.040 and 14.10.020. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to the City of Federal Way codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. CLOSING Formal processing and review of your application will now begin. Technical review comments will follow at a later date. A Notice of Application will need to be posted on site, published in the Federal Way Mirror, posted on the city's official notice boards, and mailed to the persons within 300 feet of each boundary of the subject property within 14 days of this letter. Any questions concerning your applications may be directed to me at 253-835-2634, or stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, I��� Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner c: Brian Davis, Community Development Director Jim Harris, Senior Planner Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner, via email Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, via email Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue, via email Arthur Richey, 6245 South Victor Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136, atrthvr.richev a davita.com Doc [ D. 77028 "� RECEIVED 44k NOV 2 2 2017 10':Z� CITY OF C" OF FEDERAL. WAY Federal Way COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 wyAv,ci oftederalwa .com APPLICATION No(S) Date Project Name Davita Healthcare Office Park Property Address/Location S 323rd St Federal Way, WA Parcel Number(s) 21546-0060 -0090 -0110, -0120 Project Description Development of a +/- 200,000 square foot office space build ing and additional parking for Davita Healthcare. PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) X Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI X SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information OP-1 Zoning Designation Office Park Comprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements Val ue of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): B Occupancy Type II-B Construction Type Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Applicant Name:Arthur Richey Address: 6245 S Victor Ave City/State: Tulsa, OK Zip: 74136 Phone: (918) 810-3700 Fax: Email:a t w-rich da i c Signa x I Agent (if different ifeari Applicant) ' r 17 Name: Eric LaBrie, ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC Address: 33400 8th Ave S, Suite 205 City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-838-6113 Fax: 253-838-7104 Email: eric.labde@esmcivil.com Signature: n .—d Owner Name: Genesis KC Development, LLC Address: Same as above City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Page 1 of 1 kAHandoutslMaster Land Use Application CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Oppomwtupity April 8, 2019 Mr. Eric LaBrie ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC 33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205 Federal Way, �Y�A 98003 erie.labrie.@esm c CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com FILE Jim Ferrell, Mayor Re. Files #17-105642-UP & 17-105643-SE; 2nd ROUND TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS DaVita healthcare Office Park, Federal Way Dear Mr. LaBrie: Per your request, city departments/divisions have the following comments in response to your September 12, 2018, October 31, 2018, November 9, 2018, and February 28, 2019, resubmittals. This proposal is subject to the provisions of the 1994 Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Development Agreement (CZA), and Office Park Zone (OP-1) zoning regulations in effect on August 23, 1994. Any procedural requirements must meet today's codes (Federal Way Retired Cade R WRC] Title 19). Some comments provided herein are required and some are informative, while others may be applicable during future steps of the project. Questions regarding technical review comments should be addressed to the referenced staff representative. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — PLANNING DIVISION Stacey Welsh, (253) 835-2634, stacty.welsh@cilyoffederalway.com 1. Comments below are based on materials submitted for the land use application, not the building permits. The building permits have not gone through a land use technical review, as the land use application is still in process. A brief examination of the building permit site plan revealed differences in certain items than what is shown on the land use site plan. This concern was discussed with ESM, who followed up with a February 28, 2019, letter explaining the differences between the land use and building permit materials, which was helpful. The building permit drawings attached to that letter were not reviewed. Moving forward, the land use application materials and building permit materials need to match; revise and resubmit land use application materials as necessary. a. Also, the February 28, 2019, letter from ESM noted above describes application processing timelines. To clarify, a SEPA threshold determination has a two week comment period followed by a three week appeal period. A Use Process III decision has a two week appeal period. 2. Technical comments made about an item on one sheet may necessitate changes to other related sheets and related documents. It is the applicant's responsibility to determine any such necessary adjustments. Please ensure consistent information is communicated throughout the plan set and associated application materials. Doa I.D. 78983 17-105642-00-UP NIr. Eric LaBrie Page 2 of 5 April 8, 2019 Future submittals related to this project must contain the properties' most current legal descriptions and parcel numbers. 4. Provide documentation in compliance with Federal Way City Code (FWCC) 22-1421(b). 5. Revise the landscaping plan to: a) Address the provision of ten feet of Type III landscaping along property lines abutting access easements where an inadequate amount is shown on the drawing submitted with the land use application, which includes the northwest corner and along the eastern property line of the parking lot parcels. Five feet of Type III landscaping is required along the western property line of the building parcel as well (FWCC 22-1566[h]). b) Demonstrate detailed compliance with FWCC 22-1567(e)(1). c) Show the transformer and associated landscape screening per FWCC 22-1565(a)(1). d) Include details regarding the irrigation system. The landscape plan states, "Per FWCC 22-1564(o-t), irrigation shall be provided to establish new plantings. The irrigation system will be designed to include separate irrigation zones for landscape perimeter buffer (where there are new plantings), lawn, and interior parking lot areas." No other irrigation details are provided in the submittal. See FWCC 22-1564(o) and FWCC 22-1564(t). The plan shows lawn to be planted near the west side of the building. e) Show the following corrected items:. i. On Sheet LA-01: 1. Parking lot landscaping islands that separate head -to -head parking stalls shall be eight feet in width per FWCC 22-1567(c). For both parking lot areas, the majority of parking lot landscape islands that separate head -to -head parking stalls do not meet this standard. The width of landscaping in these areas must.be increased. 2. Tree 952 identified on Sheet TR-01 is missing from Sheet LA-01; correct the discrepancy and verify whether any significant tree calculations are affected. 3. The note located in the lower right portion of the sheet regarding the Concomitant Agreement and vegetation remaining does not apply within the OP-1 zone. 4. The large text box on the sheet located north of South 323,d Street on Lot J needs correction, as it references code that applies in the PO zone. ii. Sheet LA-02 contains some code text that does not apply to the project, or that needs to be corrcctcd; see the enclosed red line markup drawing. 6. The plan shows retention of five trees (tree numbers: 958, 959, 962, 963, and 964) that the tree assessment recommends removal of for safety as the trees are no As these trees are not part of the significant tree retention count, they should be removed per the applicant's arborist's recommendation. Update materials submitted accordingly to reflect this action. 7. The applicant is proposing that as part of the significant tree count, tree numbers 952, 960, and 961 can each count as two trees, per FWCC 22-1568(c)(3). However these trees do not meet any of the criteria contained within FWCC 22-1568(c)(3)(a-c). The significant tree count must be adjusted and additional trees either retained or planted, and shown on the landscaping plan. 17-105642-00-UP Doc I.D. 78983 Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 3 of 5 April 8, 2019 8. The submitted Forest Practices Application lacks sufficient detail, including the volume of merchantable timber to be harvested (board feet) and the harvest method; among other details required under sections #8 and #9 of the application. Application revisions with additional details provided by the applicant are necessary. 9. Pedestrian connections on the parking lot site shall be continuous, without breaks across'the site; meaning the distinct pavement texture and color shall extend across asphalt drive aisles. The same applies to the building parcel, in particular the connection located east of the building frontage across the parking lot to the driveway access off of South 323=d. 10. The applicant's submittal indicates that "The only location with blank walls in excess of 240 sf are located at the primary conference rooms along the west building elevation, where the walls provide a backdrop to landscaping elements." It is unclear from the submitted elevation drawing and landscaping plan where this location is and how the landscaping satisfies FWCC 22-1564(u), which requires planting to include trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Revise the elevation drawings and landscaping plan to demonstrate compliance with FWCC 22-1564(u). 11. Submit a lighting plan for verification of compliance with FWCC 22-954(c). 12. Lakehaven issued certificates of availability in November 2017; certificates are valid for one-year. Updated certificates of water and sewer availability shall be submitted. PUBLIC WORKS — DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Kevin Peterson, (253) 835-2734, keyin.peterson�a.cityof£ederalway'.c� Prior to land use approval, the following comments need to be addressed: ENGINEERING 13. Show the required street frontage improvements —new, wider sidewalks and wider planter strips. 14. Provide a street cross-section that depicts both the existing roadway improvements and right-of-way, and the new improvements with the proposed new right-of-way. 15. It does not appear that water quality treatment is being provided for the northern portion of the "satellite" parking lot. Please show a water quality treatment facility for this portion of the parking lot. SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING 16. For designing in accordance with space requirements in FWRC 19.125.150 Table A, show the shared storage space in the interior plans. Please demonstrate how the roll up door and exterior loading area can be accessed by service vehicles (show related features such as loading dock, curb cuts, paving, and/or an accessible drive aisle). If the concept is to always store containers in the interior of the building, the plans should show the designated custodial service/limited access area as well as the related wastewater drainage to sanitary sewer. Provide details on any related odor control or ventilation features as well. If there are interior chutes that will be used to move wastes from upper floors to the custodial service area, show these in the interior plans as well. Doc. LD. 78983 17-105642-00-UP Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 4 of 5 April 8, 2019 17. If storing waste containers outdoors, these containers must be screened according to FWRC 19.125.010 et al. The exterior plans should show the screening and enclosures with sight -obscuring walls and gates, and demonstrate adequate access for service vehicles. 18. Whether inside or outside the building, a Spill Prevention Plan shall be submitted for review for the solid waste and recycling area/enclosure. PUBLIC WORKS = TRAFFIC DIVISION Sarady Long, (253) 835-2743, saradv.long(tycityoffedetalway.com 19. City comments to follow at a later date. 20. The following comments on the TIA are from WSDOT: a. There are four project proposals within the Federal Way campus (former Weyerhaeuser campus): Warehouse A, Warehouse B, DaVita, and Greenline. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) for DaVita incorporated new trips generated for the office building, but did not include traffic volume generated by the Warehouse A, Warehouse B, and Greenline proposals. The projects should be analyzed together. Separate TLAs have been submitted for Warehouse A, Warehouse B, and DaVita projects, so it is assumed the projects will be developed within a similar timeframe. The projects are within the same campus,'so the cumulative traffic generated will have an impact on the I-5 and South 320th Street southbound and northbound ramp terminal intersections adjacent to the campus. To determine the impact and level of mitigation, the project proposals should be analyzed together. The ramp capacity at South 320th Street from southbound I-5 and to northbound I-5 should also be analyzed. b. In the AM peak hour, the DaVita project is anticipated to add 62 new trips to the intersection of the southbound 1-5 off -ramp and South 320th Street. The project exceeds the vehicular trip threshold in the Developer Services Manual for determining whether a highway improvement should be requested. The PM peak hour was not included in the analysis. The cumulative impact of these developments will affect the operation of the transportation network and the interstate. As mitigation for the cumulative impacts from the Weyerhaeuser campus developments, WSDOT requests that the PM peak hour be analyzed to determine impacts. CLOSING Please be aware that this review does not preclude the city from requesting additional information or requiring conditions related to any topic, including those discussed above. Please submit revised application materials as appropriate; accompanied by the completed "Resubmittal Information Form" (enclosed). Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. 17-105642-00-UP Doc. I.D. 79983 r� Mr. Eric LaBrie Page 5 of 5 April 8, 2019 If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at stac .wels ci offed lWaV-CQrn, or 253 835-2634. Sincerely, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner enc: Resubmittal Information Form Sheet LA-02 Mark Up c: Brian Davis, Community Development Director Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Felix Palisoc, WSDOT,1'aluoF wsdot wjg2 Arthur Richey, arthur.rich vita.com - Savanna Nagorski,,Savanna.;\lagnrs •'(Ce�esmcivil.cnrrZ 17-105642-00-UP Doc, LD- 78983