17-103654M
CITY OF
�. Federal Way
September 18, 2017
Mr. Eric LaBrie
ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC
33400 8th Avenue South, Suite 205
Federal Way, WA 98003
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www. cityoffederalway. com
Jim Ferrell, Mayor
FILE
Re: File #17-103654-00-PC, PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
DaVita Healthcare Office Park, Federal Way
Dear Mr. LaBrie:
Thank you for participating in the preapplication conference with the City of Federal Way's Development
Review Conunittee (DRC) held August 24, 2017. We hope that the information discussed at that meeting was
helpful in understanding the general requirements for your project as submitted.
This letter summarizes comments given to you at the meeting by the members of the DRC. The members
who reviewed your project and provided comments include staff from the city's Planning and Building
Divisions and Public Works Department, and representatives from Lakehaven Water & Sewer District and
South King Fire & Rescue. This proposal is subject to the provisions of the 1994 Weyerhaeuser Company
Concomitant Pre -Annexation Development Agreement (CZA), and Office Park Zone (OP-1) zoning
regulations in effect on August 23, 1994. Any procedural requirements must meet today's codes (Federal Way
Revised Code [FWRq Title 19).
The key contact for your project is Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP. She may be contacted at 253-835-
2634, or stacU.welshCa�cityoffederalwa co For specific technical questions about your project, please
contact the appropriate DRC representative as listed below. Otherwise, any general questions about the
preapplication and permitting process can be referred to your key contact.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposal is to construct approximately 180,000 square feet of office space and associated parking on 5.2
acres.
MAJOR ISSUES
Outlined below is a summary of the major issues of your project based on the plans and information
submitted for the preapplication review. These issues can change due to modifications and revisions in the
plans. These major issues only represent comments that the DRC consider most significant to your project
and do not include the majority of the comments provided. The major issues section is only provided as a
means to highlight critical requirements or issues. Please be sure to read the entire department comments
made in the next section of this letter.
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 2 of 18
September 18, 2017
• Planning Division
1. The proposal is located -in the Office Park (OP-1) zone. Section III, Uses Permitted of Exhibit D of the
Concolnitant Agreement lists offices as a permitted use.
2. Since the building exceeds 12,000 square feet and there are more than 40 parking spaces, review under
the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) is required subject to Use Process III.
3. Boundary Line Adjustments are required to remove interior lot lines between Lots F and I, and Lots K
and L.
4. If the development, use, or activity that requires approval through Process III is part of a proposal that
also requires approval through Process IV, the entire proposal will be decided upon using Process IV,
per FWRC 19.15.060 and 19.70.010. Under Process IV, the Hearing Examiner will make the final
decision following a public hearing.
■ Public Works Development Services Division
1) Redevelopment of the parking areas on the existing (leased) DaVita property appears to meet the
thresholds that trigger the same stormwater requirements as are required for the development of the
new building and parking lots, including the city's nonconforming water quality code; details are
provided below.
2) It also appears that a portion of the stormwater runoff from the leased site discharges to a separate
stormwater pond to the west; therefore, any pond enhancements and/or upgrades would have to be
.considered for each of the two separate ponds affected by this development/redevelopment.
3) The engineer will need to keep in mind that the original stormwater ponds were designed to a peak -
flow matching standard, which also allowed for existing site conditions to be used to analyze the pre -
developed peak flows. The current standard is a duration -matching standard, and requires historic
site conditions be used to analyze the pre -developed conditions. This may make it difficult in
analyzing the existing ponds and the ability to retro-fit them to the current standard.
4) If the existing ponds cannot be retrofitted to meet the current standards, flow control and water
quality treatment will have to be provided on -site.
■ Public Works Traffic Division
■ Tran portation Concurrency Management (FIFIIRC 19.90) — A transportation concurrency permit with the
application fee of ,$'8,505.00 is required.
Traffic Mitigation —The four parcels were developed as part of the East Campus Corporate Park Parcel
1 Binding Site Plans (BSP). Traffic impacts were appropriately mitigated with the Parcel 1 BSP
approval.
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc 1D: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 3 of 18
September 18, 2017
■ Froniage improvements (FWiCC 22-1473) - Construct street improvements and dedicate tight -of -way along
the property on 32^d Avenue South and South 323-1 Street. Assuming a symmetrical cross section,
additional right-of-way dedication of nine feet will be required to accommodate the improvements.
• South 32411, Street Extension — Please see comment #4 in the Street Frontage Improvements section.
■ Trail— Provide a non -motorized trail between 32nd Avenue South and South 324th Street.
• Access Management (FWCC 22-1543) — Modify the existing driveway approach to a single lane
roundabout approach.
• Building Division
2015 IBC Section 427.1, "Vehicle Charging Stations Required." Five percent of the parking spaces shall be
provided with electrical vehicle charging stations, and at least one accessible parking space shall be served by
electric charging station infrastructure.
• Lakehaven Water & Sewer
Hydraulic model results (FF #227) indicate that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable system liquid
velocity of 10 ft/s, at no less than 20 psi, is exceeded at a fire flow rate above 5,200 GPM. This flow figure
depicts the calculated performance of the water distribution system under high demand conditions. Fire flow
rates greater than available in the e)dsting distribution system may be accommodated through water
distribution system improvements. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail.
DEPARTMENT COMMENTS
Outlined below are the comments made by the representatives of each department present at the
preapplication conference. Each section should be read thoroughly. If you have questions, please contact the
representative listed for that section.
Planning Division (Stacey Welsh, 253-835-2634, state .welsh(@,ci offederalway.com)
1. Zoning Designation and Use---- The subject property is designated Office Park (OP-1). Based on Section III,
Uses Permitted of Exhibit'D of the Concomitant Agreement, offices are allowed subject to Process III per
FWRC Chapter 19.65.
2. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) — Pursuant to FWRC 14.15.030(1), the project is subject to
environmental review under the State Environmental PoUg Act (SEPA), as the proposal exceeds the flexible
thresholds (development of more than 12,000 square feet commercial building and 40 parking spaces).
An environmental threshold determination made by the Director of Community Development must be
issued and associated appeal period concluded prior to issuance of a land use decision. Public notice will
be required as established in FWRC Title 14.
Discussed at Meeting: Ability to use previous threshold determination(s). With the application
submittal, in addition to a completed environmental checklist, provide documentation of any
previous threshold determination(s), for consideration by the SEPA Responsible Official.
Da ID: 76342
File 17-103654-00-PC
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 4of18
September 18, 2017
3. Land Use Application — The project requires Use Process III, which is a review process conducted by city
staff with a final decision issued by the Community Development Director. The Process III decision
criteria are contained in FWRC 19.65.100(2).
Discussed at Meeting. Include the stormwater pond parcel in the land use application and
SEPA submittal, as modifications to the existing stormwater pond are proposed.
4. Boundary Line Ad ushwent: Boundary Line Adjustments (BLAs) are required to remove interior lot lines
between Lots F and I, since a building is proposed to be built on the common property line, and for Lots
K and L, in order for Lot F to be considered an "adjoining" lot for off -site parking purposes. The BLAB
will need to be recorded before the building permit can be issued.
Discussed at Meeting: If Lot F is not proposed to be included as part of the project, then a BLA
would not be necessary to remove the interior lot line between Lots F and I.
5. Land Use Review Timeframes — The Planning Division will notify the applicant of the application status
within 28 days of submittal. If the application is determined complete, staff will issue a Letter of
Complete Application. FWRC limits the administrative review to 120 days from the date of a complete
application. The 120-day review period will stop any time the applicant has been requested by the city to
correct plans, perform required studies, or provide additional information needed to issue a decision. The
review period will begin within 14 days following submittal of requested items. Please be advised that any
request for corrections and/or additional information must be provided within 180 days of written
notification, or the land use application will expire.
6. Public Notice —Process III applications require a public notice and comment period. Within 14 days of
issuing the Letter of Complete Application, a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way
Mirror, posted on the subject property, placed at the city's three designated notice boards, and mailed to
property owners within 300 feet of the subject property.
7. Land Use Application Submittal Requitents —Please refer to the enclosed Bulletin #001, "Submittal
Requirements for Process III or IV," to determine what materials must be submitted with the land use
application. In addition, the application must be accompanied by applicable fees.
8. Effect of Use Process Decision — In accordance with FWRC 19.15.100, "Lapse of Approval - Generally," the
applicant must substantially complete construction for the development activity, use of land, or other
actions approved, and complete the applicable conditions listed in the Use Process decision within five
years after the final decision of the city on the matter, or the decision becomes void. Provisions for
extension of time are contained within FWRC 19.15.110, "Lapse of Approval — Time Extension."
9. Comprehensive Plan Amendment —Refer to comments from Public Works Traffic, below. The city is in the
process of considering an amendment to the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP).
10. Key Codes and Development Regulations —
a) Applicability —The project is subject to the CZA, the OP-1 Zoning Regulations, and, with certain
exceptions, the city code and development regulations in effect at that time. Unless noted otherwise,
the following comments and code citations pertain to 1994 development regulations. See the table
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
M
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 5of18
September 18, 2017
below for information
regarding minimum lot size, lot coverage, building height, parking, setbacks,
and landscaping:
Minimum Lot Size
None
Lot Covetage
No maximum lot coverage
Building Height
Can exceed 35 feet with Process III and meeting the following requirements of Note 1 (b, c,
and d) of Section 22-826, Office Use of the 1994 Federal Way City Code (FWCC)
(b) Each required yard abutting the structure is increased 1' for each 1' the structure
exceeds 35' above average building elevation;
(c) The increased height will not block any designated views designated by the
Comprehensive Plan; and
(d) The increased height is either in character with surrounding uses or consistent with
desirable development in the area of the subject property as established by the
Comprehensive Plan.
(Also see enclosed definition of "average building elevation.")
Parking
For office use, one space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area. See enclosed parking
lot design criteria handout. Off -site parking is proposed, and stand-alone parcels are proposed
to be used for parking. The application submittal will need to include documentation in
compliance with FWCC Section 22-1421(2)(b).
Setbacks
Front — 50 feet; Side — 20 feet, Rear — 20 feet
The first 25 feet of the required front yard must be landscaped and contain a three -foot -high
berm or three -foot -high dense, sight obscuring vegetation. Parking and driving areas may be
located in the second 25 feet of the required front yard.
Ducurrad at Meeting., Whether or not the southern property line would be considered the
"front" yard. Staff will review the proposal once it is submitted for where the primary
access is proposed to be located. You are encouraged to accommodate the 50 foot front
yard setback from the southern property line to accommodate potential future site
modifications. Also, the submitted drawing shows the proposed building very close to the
western property line, the project must accommodate required setbacks.
Landscaping
Type III landscaping ten feet in width shall be provided along all property lines abutting
public rights -of -way and access easements.
Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all property lines, except as
noted above.
b) Design Guidelines— The project is not subject to the city's Community Design Guidelines because the
guidelines were not part of the 1994 code. However, under the applicable 1994 site plan review
decisional criteria, the project must, "...embody good design principles that will result in high quality
development on the subject property." Additionally, the 1994 Federal Way Comprebenrave Pfau (FWCP)
contemplated office parks with "superior architectural quality." Few specific provisions were
contained in the 1994 zoning code for architectural and site design. The city's current design
guidelines provide a variety of design principles and practices to ensure quality development. In order
for the project to meet the site plan review criteria, comprehensive plan, and intent of the OP-1
zone, it is recommended that the project incorporate these adopted design guidelines to the extent
possible, with particular attention to the following elements:
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 6 of 18
September 18, 2017
a. Pedestrian connections should be provided between properties to establish pedestrian
links to adjacent buildings, parking, pedestrian areas, and public rights -of -way.
b. A pedestrian plaza should be provided for the building adjacent to major entrances,
and with connectivity to adjacent pedestrian areas and routes of travel. Pedestrian
plazas and pedestrian crosswalks over drive aisles should be stamped concrete, as
opposed to paving or striping, to clearly delineate such areas, for safety purposes as
well as project aesthetics.
c. The site should incorporate pedestrian -scale lighting; amenities such as bike racks and
trash receptacles at appropriate locations.
d. Overall building design should utilize a variety of colors, materials, textures, and
methods of modulation and articulation. Building entrances should generally be
oriented toward rights -of -way. Public entrances should be clearly recognizable from
streets and internal circulation areas, and should utilize features such as varied roof
lines and pitches, canopies, awnings, storefront windows, etc.
e. Ground -level glass adjacent to a street or pedestrian area should be of non -glare, non -
reflective glazing.
f. Buildings built over parking should not appear to "float" over the parking area, but
should be linked with ground level uses or screening. Parking at grade under a building
is discouraged unless the parking area is completely enclosed within the building, or
wholly screened with walls and/or landscaped berms.
g. Parking structures and vehicle entrances should be designed to minimize views into
the garage interior from surrounding streets. Methods to help minimize such views
may include, but are not limited to, landscaping, planters, and decorative grilles and
screens.
Please provide a design narrative with the land use application submittal which identifies which
design guidelines have been incorporated into the project.
c) Trash Receptacles, Ground Mounted Mechanical Equipment, and Rooftop Mechanical Equ pment — Provide
details on location and screening with the submittal.
d) Land Surface Modification — Per Section 10 of the 1994 Concomitant Agreement, a Land Surface
Modification Permit (grading permit or equivalent) may be reviewed by the city in advance of a
development permit; provided, the development permit application has been made and all
information required by Article XIII, "Land Surface Modifications" of the 1994 code has been
provided to the city. Issuance of a grading permit for the land surface modification may also be
contingent upon meeting the requirements of the adopted surface water design manual, and only
after approval of the required Use Process.
11. Significant Trees — Tree management and removal is regulated under FWCC Section 22-1568. Refer to
FWCC Section 22-1568(b) for the definition of a significant tree. A tree retention plan is required to be
submitted with the first permit application for development, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(c)(2).
Submit a tree retention plan prepared by a qualified professional that includes a tree survey, or cluster
survey, that identifies the location, size, number, and species of all significant trees on the site, and a
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 7 of 18
September 18, 2017
development plan identifying the proposed trees to be retained, removed, transplanted, or replaced,
including a final report on percentage retained. If development will require the removal of more than 75
percent of the significant trees on -site, significant trees are required to be replaced in an amount equal to
25 percent of the significant trees that existed on the subject property prior to commencing any
development activity pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(c)(1)(a).
12. Forev Practices — A Forest Practices Class IV -General Application is required if more than 5,000 board feet
of merchantable timber will be harvested from the property in conjunction with the development activity.
The city, will review the proposed Class IV -General Forest Practices in conjunction with SEPA review,
and review of associated development permits or approvals.
13. CriticalAreas —The four parcels do not appear to contain any critical areas. Tract C to the east of Lot L
contains the stormwater pond, and Tract E adjacent to Tract C is a sensitive area tract. The city's Critical
Areas Map shows a wetland and stream on Tract C. The formal application must include a critical areas
report prepared by a qualified professional. This report must evaluate the proposal and probable impacts
to critical areas, and provide a mitigation plan, if applicable, in compliance with the CZA and current
FWRC critical areas regulations. The report may be peer reviewed at the applicant's cost. Due to lack of
details at this time, the applicant is encouraged to contact city staff during the design process if they will
have critical area impacts, in order to discuss the required Use Process review.
If the development, use, or activity that requites approval through Process III is part of a proposal that
also requires approval through Process IV, the entire proposal ,vill be decided upon using Process IV, per
FWRC 19.15.060 and 19.70.010. Under Process IV, the Hearing Examiner will make die final decision
following a public hearing. In addition, the city will not issue any approvals to fill wetlands until all state,
federal, or other agency permits as may be required to fill the wetlands have been obtained and
verification provided to the city.
14. Outside Agency Permits — It is the applicant's responsibility to identify and obtain all required state, federal,
or other agency permits as may be required.
15. Application Fees & Submittal— Please contact the Permit Center at permitcenter ci alwa .c offederm, or
253-835-2607 for updated fee schedule information for applications and permits.
PUBLIC WORKS — DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION (Kevin Peterson 253-835-2734,
kevin. eterson ci offederalwa .com)
Land Use Issues — Stormwater
1. Surface water runoff control and water quality treatment will be required per the 2016 King County Surface
Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and City Addendum. This project meets the requirements for a full
drainage review. At the time of land use site plan submittal, a preliminary Technical Information Report
(TIR) addressing the relevance of the project to the nine core and five special requirements of the
KCSWDM will be required. A Level 1 downstream analysis shall also be provided in the preliminary TIR.
2. The project lies within a conservation flow control area; thus, the applicant must design the flow control
facility to meet these performance criteria. In addition to flow control facilities, Best Management
Doc ID: 76342
File 17-103654-00-PC
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 8 of 18
September 18, 2017
Practices (BMP's) are required as outlined in the KCSWDM. The project also lies within an enhanced
basic water quality area. Water quality treatment shall be designed to meet the treatment criteria of the
enhanced basic water quality menu.
3. In addition to the KCSWDM, our initial review suggests that FWRC 19.30.120, "Nonconforming Water
Quality Improvements," applies to the partial redevelopment of the existing (leased) DaVita site.
Specifically, the following item is applicable:
1.c. Redevelopment which involves the repair or replacement of 5,000 square feet or more of
an impervious surface, when such redevelopment is not part of a routine maintenance activity;
Therefore, water quality treatment will be required for the entire site, including new and existing pollution
generating impervious surfaces. Because a large area of the leased site discharges to a known Sphagnum
Bog, water quality treatment options for those areas must meet the Sphagnum Bog Treatment Criteria,
while discharges to the east must meet the enhanced basic water quality criteria, as provided in the
KCSWDM.
4. If infiltration is proposed for BMP's, soil logs prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or septic
designer must be provided to verify infiltration suitability.
5. Detention and water quality facilities for private commercial developments outside the City Center Core
must be above ground (i.e. open pond). Underground facilities are allowed only with approval from the
City of Federal Way Public Works Department.
6. Show the proposed location and dimensions of the detention and water quality facilities on the
preliminary plans. .
7. If more than one acre will be disturbed during construction, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) construction stormwater permit may be required. Information regarding this permit
can be obtained from the Washington State Department of Ecology at 360-407-6048, or
httn://,v.egy.wa.gov/programslwa/starrnwaterlconstructionlindea.html.
Right -of -Way Improvements
1. See the Traffic Division comments from Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Sarady Long for
traffic related items.
2. Improvements within the pond (grading to enlarge the pond) will trigger city code requirements for street
frontage improvements along all street frontages adjacent to the pond.
3. If dedication of additional right-of-way is required to install street frontage improvements, the dedication
shall be conveyed to the city through a statutory warranty deed. The dedicated area must have clear title
prior to recording.
4. All stormwater treatment and detention requirements outlined above may apply to any improvements
within the public right-of-way.
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 9 of 18
September 18, 2017
Building Permit Issues
1. Engineered plans are required for clearing, grading, road construction, and utility work. Plans must be
reviewed and approved by the city. Engineering review fees are ,$'2,430.00 for the first 12 hours of review,
and ,$135.00 per hour for additional review time. A final TIR shall be prepared for the project and
submitted with the engineering plans. Both the TIR and the plans will require the signature/seal of a
professional engineer registered/licensed in the State of Washington.
2. The Federal Way Public Works Development Standards Manual (including standard detail drawings, standard
notes, and engineering checklists) to assist the applicant's engineer in preparing the plans and TIR, is
available on the city's website at www.eityoffederalwa y com/index.aspx?nid=l71.
3. Bonding is required for all street improvements and temporary erosion and sediment control measures
associated with the project. The bond amount shall be 120 percent of the estimated costs of the
improvements. An administrative fee deposit will need to accompany the bond to cover any possible
legal fees in the event the bond must be called. Upon completion of the installation of the improvements,
and final approval of the Public Works Inspector, the bond will be reduced to 30 percent of the original
amount and held for a two-year maintenance period.
4. The developer will be responsible for the maintenance of all storm drainage facilities (including the
detention and water quality facilities) and street systems during the two-year maintenance period. During
that time, the Public Works Inspector will make periodic visits to the site to ensure the developer's
compliance with the maintenance requirements. Upon satisfactory completion of the two-year
maintenance period, the remainder of the bond will be released. Maintenance for public roads and
subdivision drainage facilities then become the responsibility of the city. Maintenance for private roads
and drainage facilities, including short plats, remain the responsibility of the individual property owners.
5. When topographic survey information is shown on the plans, the vertical datum block shall include the
phrase "DATUM: N.G.V.D.-29" or "DATUM: K.C.A.S.," on all sheets where vertical elevations are
called out.
6. Drawings submitted for plan review shall be printed on 24" x 36" or 22" x 34" paper. Site plans shall be
drawn at a scale of 1" = 20', or larger. Architectural scales are not permitted on engineering plans.
7. Provide cut and fill quantities on the clearing and grading plan.
8. Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control (TESC) measures, per Appendix D of the 2016 KCSWDM,
must be shown on the engineering plans.
9. The site plan shall show the location of any existing and proposed utilities in the areas affected by
construction.
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 10 of 18
September 18, 2017
PUBLIC WORKS — TRAFFIC DIVISION (Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.longgciiyoffederalway.com}
Transportation Concurrency Analysis (FWRC 19.90)
1. Based on the submitted materials for 200,000 square foot office building, the Institute of Transportation
En,gineers (TE) Trip Generation - 811, Edition, land use code 714 (Corporate HQ), the proposed project is
estimated to generate approximately 280 new weekday PM peak hour trips and 1,596 daily trips.
2. A concurrency permit is required for this development project. The Traffic Division will perform a
concurrency analysis to determine if adequate roadway capacity exists during the weekday PM peak
period to accommodate the proposed development. Please note that supplemental transportation analysis
and concurrency mitigation may be required if the proposed project creates an impact not anticipated in
ti-ic six -year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP).
The estimated fee for the concurrency permit application is $8,505.00 (51 - 500 trips). This fee is an
estimate and based on the materials submitted for the preapplication conference. The concurrency
applicant fee must be paid in full at the time the concurrency permit application is submitted with the
land use application. The fee may change based on the new weekday PM peak hour trips as identified in
the concurrency trip generation. The applicant has the option of having an independent traffic engineer
prepare the concurrency analysis consistent with city procedures; however, the fee remains the same.
Traffic Mitigation
1. The underlying parcels were developed under the East Campus Corporate Park Parcel 1 Binding Site Plans
(BSP). As part of the Parcel 1 BSP development approval, traffic impacts identified in the Traffic Impact
Analysis prepared by The Transpo Group were appropriately mitigated. Additional mitigations would be
required if the total square feet or PM trips from the Parcel 1 BSP exceeds the approved threshold.
Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)
1. A Transportation Impact Analyses (TIA) to identify transportation impacts of development projects and
provide appropriate mitigation measures is required. The TIA is required to assess additional project
impacts beyond those that were identified under the concurrency permit process. Mitigation
improvements necessary beyond those identified in the TIP to meet the City's adopted level -of -service
standards are required to be provided by the applicant.
2. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by engineer licensed in the state of Washington is required for
this development project. The engineer should contact the Traffic Division for a scoping sheet in the
initial stages of their study. The TIA should include the following analysis:
■ Analysis of intersections impacted by 100 trips in the weekday morning and Saturday peak hours.
■ Queuing analysis of access points for morning and evening peak hours.
Street Frontage Improvements (FWCC 22-1473)
1. The applicant/owner would be expected to construct full street improvements on South 323rd Street and
32nd Avenue South consistent with the planned collector roadway; consisting of a 44-foot street with curb
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Air. Eric Labrie
Page 11 of 18
September 18, 2017
and gutter, 6-foot planter strips with street trees, 8-foot sidewalks, and street lights within a 74-foot right-
of-way. These streets have been improved, but not to the current adopted standard. Furthermore, the
planter strip and part of the sidewalk were set aside as an easement. Assuming a symmetrical cross
section, a nine -foot right-of-way dedication and full street improvements are required, as measured from
the street centerline.
2. The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the
required street improvements (FWCC 22-1477). Information about a right-of-way modification request is
available through the Public Works Development Services Division. Modification requests have a
nominal review fee currently at $290.
3. Tapers and transitions beyond the project frontage may be required as deemed necessary for safety
purposes; taper rate shall be WS^2/60, or as directed by the Public Works Director.
4. The current FWCP Map III-3 depicted a five -lane east -west principal collector road (South 324th Street
extension) extending from SR 5 to 32nd Avenue South. As part of this year's comprehensive plan
amendment, the South 324th Street extension will be realigned to terminate at Weyerhaeuser Way South
instead of 32nd Avenue South. Since the comprehensive plan amendment has not been approved, the
applicant would be expected to dedicate right-of-way and construct improvements for the portion of the
road extension abutting and within the subject property. At such time the comprehensive plan
amendment is approved by the City Council, the development would be released from the required street
improvements and right-of-way dedication.
5. Provide a non -motorized trail connection through DaVita property between 32nd Avenue South and the
southerly property line (future South 3241h Street). The non -motorized trail shall be 12 feet wide paved in
20 feet of dedicated right-of-way. Pedestrian -scale lighting will need to be provided if the two ends of the
access corridor are not inter -visible.
Access Management (FWRC 19.135)
1. Per FWCC 22-1543, the driveway must be located no closer than 150 feet to any street intersection, or to
any other driveway, whether on or off the subject property.
2. All driveways shall be improved to meet ADA standards, and widened if necessary to accommodate the
expected vehicles using the site.
3. Adequate throat length must be provided and shall be at least 40 feet from the edge of the pavement or
curb. The throat length may be reduced for a one-way driveway with no potential conflict.
4. The development is expected to add additional trips to the existing driveway in the roundabout. To
provide safe and efficient traffic circulation, the driveway approach should be modified to a single lane
roundabout approach.
5. The proposed pedestrian crosswalk on South 323rd Street is not recommended due to conflicts with
turning traffic. Pedestrian crossing should be diverted to the roundabout for safety. This would entail
modifying the existing splinter islands and constructing new ramps to meet ADA standards.
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 12 of 18
September 18, 2017
6. For driveways that serve uses other than single-family residential uses and zero lot line townhouse
developments, the maximum driveway width is 30 feet for a two-lane two-way driveway and 40 feet for a
three -lane two-way driveway (FWCC 22-1542). Driveway widths may be increased in order to provide
adequate width for vehicles that may be reasonably expected to use the driveway, as determined by the
Public Works Director.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — BUILDING DIVISION (Peter Lawrence, 253-835-2621,
eter.lawrence ci ❑ffederalwa .com)
International Brrildiig Code (IBC), 2015
Washington State Amendments WAC 51-50
International Mechanical Code (IMC), 2015
Washington State Amendments WAC 51-52
Uniform Plumhing Code (UPC), 2015
Washington State Amendments WAC 51-56 &
WAC 51-57
Building Criteria
Occupancy Classification: B
Type of Construction: IIB
International Fire Code (IFC), 2015
Washington State Amendments WAC 51-54
National Electric Code (NEC), 2017
Accessibility Code, ICC/ANSI A117.1 — 2009
Wlashiiegtun State Energy Code, 2015 WAC 51-11
Floor Area: 200,000 square feet (shall comply with 2015 IBC Section 503 for allowable heights and area)
• Maximum 75 feet in height.
■ Maximum four stories above grade plane.
• Limited to 69,000 square feet per floor ( SM = buildings two or more stories above grade plane
equipped throughout with an NFPA 13 system) see table 506.2.
• Type IIIA allows 85,000 per floor, four stories above grade plane and max height 85 feet.
• Section 507 unlimited area: open spaces 60 feet minimum.
• Frontage increase shall comply with 506.3.
Number of Stories: 2 or 3
Fire Protection: NFPA 13
Wind/Seismic: Basic wind speed 85 Mph, Exposure, 25# Snow load, Seismic Zone D-1
A complete building permit application and commercial checklist are required at the time of submittal.
(Additional copies of application and checklists may be obtained on our web site at www.cityoffederalway.com.)
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
VLr. Eric Labrie
Page 13 of 18
September 18, 2017
Submit five sets of drawings and specifications. Specifications shall include: two soils report, two structural
calculations, two energy calculations, and, tmo ventilation calculations. Note: A Washington State Registered
architects' stamp is required for additions/alterations (new or existing) of 4,000 gross floor areas or greater,
unless specifically listed as an "exempt" structure per the Revised Code of Washington (RCW).
Energy code compliance worksheets are required to be completed and included with your permit application.
A wet stamp and signature is required on all sheets of plans and on the cover page of any calculations submitted.
Federal Way reviews plans on a first in, first out basis; however, there are some small projects with
inconsequential review requirements that may be reviewed out of order.
Some project may require a third party review or inspection. The cost to cover these fees is the responsibility
of the applicant. Any third party fee is in addition to regular permit fees and costs.
Review Timing
The first comment letter can be expected within seven to nine weeks of submittal date. Re -check of plans will
occur in one to three weeks after re -submittal.
Revised or resubmitted plans shall be provided in the same format, size, and amount as the originally
submitted plans. Revised or resubmitted drawings shall indicate by means of clouding or written response,
what changes have been made from the original drawings. Plans for all involved departments will be
forwarded from the Community Development Department.
Other Permits & Inspections
Separate permits may be required for electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire suppression systems, and signs.
Applicants may apply for separate permits at any time prior to commencement of construction.
When required, special inspections shall be performed by WABO approved agencies, or by agencies
approved by the building official, prior to permit issuance. Construction must be approved by all reviewing
departments prior to final building division inspection.
All concerned departments (planning, public works, electrical, &fire) must sign off before the Building
Division can final the structure for occupancy. Building final must be approved prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
Construction projects may be required to have a pre -construction conference. If a pre -con meeting is
required, the general or representative, all subs, the architect or representative, the engineer or representative,
electrical contractor, and any other interested party, should attend this meeting. Meetings will occur at the
Building Division and will be scheduled by the inspector of record for the project.
Site -Specific Requirements
• 2015 IBC Section 427.1, "Vehicle Charging Stations Required." Five percent of the parking spaces shall
be provided with electrical vehicle charging stations, and at least one accessible parking space shall be
served by electric charging station infrastructure.
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 14 of 18
September 18, 2017
• The State of Washington has adopted the 2009 ANSI 117.1 standards of accessibility and ICC Chapter
11 of the 2015 IBC. We have not adopted the Federal Accessibility Standards of ADA or ADAAG.
The information provided is based on limited plans and information. The comments provided are not intended
to be a complete plan review and further comments are possible at time of building permit plan review.
LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT (Brian Asbury, 253-946-5407, basbu1yQ1akehaven.org)
Water
■ A Water Certificate of Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any
land use and/or building permit application (check with land use agency for requirement). The certificate is
valid for one year from the date of issuance. If a certificate is needed, allow one to two working days to issue
for typical. Current/2017 cost for a Water Certificate of Availability is- $90.00.
• Hydraulic model results (FF #227) indicate that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable system liquid
velocity of 10 ft/s, at no less than 20 psi, is exceeded at a fire flow rate above 5,200 GPM. This flow figure
depicts the calculated performance of the water distribution system under high demand conditions. Fire flow
rates greater than available in the existing distribution system may be accommodated through water
distribution system improvements. Please contact Lakehaven for further detail.
+ A Lakehaven Developer Extension (DE) Agreement will be required to construct new and/or abandon
existing water distribution system facilities for the proposed development, including extend-to-far-edge(s) in
accordance with long-standing Lakehaven policy. Additional detail and/or design requirements can be
obtained from Lakehaven by completing and submitting a separate application to Lakehaven for either a
Developer Pre -Design Meeting or a DE Agreement. Lakehaven encourages owners/developers/applicants
to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre-design/planning
phase to avoid delays in overall project development.
•. The site does not have any previous or existing water service connections.
• A water service connection application submitted separately to Lakehaven is required for each new service
connection to the water distribution system, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current
"Fees and Charges Resolution." Non -single-family properties require separate domestic (per building),
irrigation (if irrigated landscaped areas are incorporated into the site development), and fire -protection (if
required or installed) water service connections and meters.
To satisfy premise isolation requirements, the installation and satisfactory testing of an approved backflow
prevention assembly (BPA) adjacent to each domestic, irrigation, and fire -protection service meter is required
pursuant to WAC 246-290-490, and Lakehaven standards regarding premise isolation. For the domestic and
irrigation service connections, as low health cross -connection hazards, either a double check valve assembly
(DCVA), or a reduced pressure backflow assembly (RPBA) is required. For the fire -protection service
connection, and presuming top floor sprinkler heads will be more than 30-feet above the elevation of the
fire -protection flow -detection meter and therefore a high health cross -connection hazard, a reduced pressure
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
r�
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 15 of 18
September 18, 2017
detector assembly (RPDA) is required. Contact Lakehaven's Cross -Connection Control Program Manager
(Chris Zoepfl, CZoepfl@Lakehaven.org, 253-946-5427) for additional information on premise isolation/
BPA installation and testing coordination.
• The associated DE Agreement must achieve a point of either substantial completion or acceptance, as
determined by Lakehaven, prior to activating any new domestic or irrigation water service connection(s).
• Based on the proposal submitted, preliminary estimated Lakehaven water service connection fees, charges,
and/or deposits (2017 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be determined upon submittal
of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. Connection charges are separate from any DE fees, charges,
and/or deposits and are due at the time of application for service. All Lakehaven fees, charges, and deposits are
typically reviewed and adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice.
o Water Service/Meter Installation, Domestic, 3" preluninary size: $24,070.00, "dig" deposit
(service/meter installed by Lakehaven). Actual size TBD by Lakehaven based on applicant's
estimated maximum domestic GPM usage rate.
o Water Service/Meter Installation, Irrigation, 11/2" preliminary size: $610.00, "drop -in" fee
(service installed by developer, meter installed by Lakehaven). Actual size TBD by
Lakehaven based on applicant's estimated maximum irrigation GPM usage rate.
o Water Service/Meter Installation, Fire -Protection, 5/s" x 3/4' flow -detection meter: $260.00,
"drop -in" fee (service/vault installed by developer, meter installed by Lakehaven).
o Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Water: $3,476.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU); one
(1.00) Water ERU = 90,520 gallons of total water used per year. Actual amount due TBD
by Lakehaven based on applicant's estimated annual total water usage rate. Please contact
Lakehaven for further detail.
Sewer
• A Sewer Certificate of Availability issued separately by Lakehaven may be required to be submitted with any
land use and/or building permit application (check with land use agency for requirement). The certificate is
valid for one year from the date of issuance. If a certificate is needed, allow one to two working days to issue
for typical. Current/2017 cost for a Sewer Certificate of Availability is $90.00.
• The site does not have any previous or existing sewer service connections.
A separate Lakehaven Sewer Service Connection Permit is required for each new connection to the sanitary
sewer system, or any modification (disconnect, re -align, abandon, etc.) to an existing sewer service
connection, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current "Fees and Charges Resolution."
Minimum pipe slope for gravity sewer service connections is two percent. In addition to all other sewer
service installation standards, installation of a Type 1, 48" monitoring manhole is typically required on the
private building sewer line, for all new or modified non-residential connections. Also, installation of an
externally -located grease interceptor is required for all new restaurants and/or buildings with food service
establishments, size to be determined by applicant's engineer.
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 16of18
September 18, 2017
■ Based on die proposal submitted, preliminary estiiiiated Lakehaven sewer service cotinecdon fees, charges,
and/or deposits (2017 schedule) will be as follows. Actual connection charges will be determined upon submittal
of service connection application(s) to Lakehaven. Connection charges are separate from any DE fees, charges,
and/or deposits, and are due at the time of application for service. All Lakehaven fees, charges, and deposits are
typically reviewed and adjusted (if necessary) annually, and are subject to change without notice.
o Sewer Service Connection Permit: $210.00 fee.
o Capital Facilities Charge(s)-Sewer: $3,325.00 per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU); one
(1.00) Sewer ERU = 77,030 gallons of domestic water used per year. Actual amount due TBD
by Lakehaven based on applicant's estimated annual total domestic water usage rate. Please
contact Lakehaven for further detail.
General
All Lakehaven development engineering related application forms, and associated standards information, can
be accessed at Lakehaven's development engineering web pages (www.lakehaven.org12041degreloprnent-
engineer
• All comments herein are valid for one year and are based on the proposal(s) submitted and Lakehaven's
current regulations and policies. Any change to either the development proposal(s) or Lakehaven's
regulations and policies may affect the above comments accordingly.
SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE (Chris Cahan, 253-946-7243, chris.cahan@southldiigCire.org)
Water Supply
Fire Flow
The required fire flow for this project is 4000 gallons per minute. A Certificate of VaterAvailability, including a
hydrauNcfr,?Aw model, shall be requested from the water district and provided at the time of the building permit
application.
Fire Hydrants
This project will require four fire hydrant(s) in approved* locations. There is one existing fire hydrant on the
southwest corner of the property available for this project. There will be at least three additional fire hydrants
required within the complex.
*Hydrant spacing along access roads, and location in relationship to buildings and sprinkler FDC shall be
approved by Fire Marshal's Office
Fire hydrants shall be in service prior to and during the time of construction.
Emergency Access
Fire apparatus access roads shall comply with all ivgrdirments of Fire Access Policy 10.006 (enclosed).
The angles of approach, departure, and minimum ground clearance were not defined on this proposal.
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 17of18
September 18, 2017
Designated and marked fire lanes may be required for emergency access. This may be done during the plans
Check or prior to building final. Requirements and marking options can be found in FWRC Title 8:
http://MnLmL.codeT),Libhsl-iinL,.com/WA/FedgoLW,a—y/
Fire apparatus access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction.
Vehicle Access Gates
All vehicle access gates shall comply with the Gate Policy (enclosed).
Fire Department Lock Box
A recessed fire department "Knox" brand key box shall be installed on the building near the front entrance.
Location(s) will be approved by the plan reviewer or Deputy Fire Marshal onsite.
Fire Sprinkler System
An -NFPA 13 fire sprinkler ystem is regirired..
An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all occupancies where the total floor area included within
the surrounding exterior walls on all floor levels, including basements, exceeds 5,000 square feet. Fire walls shall
not be considered to separate a building to enable deletion of the required automatic fire -extinguishing system.
The system demand pressure (to the source) required in a hydraulically designed automatic fire sprinkler system
shall be at least 10 percent less than the correlative water supply curve pressure.
Fire Alarm
Afire alarm system is mquired.
City code requires an automatic fire detection system in all buildings exceeding 3,000 square feet gross floor area.
The fire alarm system is required to monitor the sprinkler system, including water flow. Provide full notification
as required by NFPA 72. Compkdecomage smoke detection is not required for this project. This fire detection system shall
be monitored by an approved central and/or remote station.
Emergency Responder Radio Coverage
All buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based upon the
existing coverage levels of the public safety communication system at the exterior of the building.
*Exception: if the building is less than 35 feet in height as defined in the building code.
CLOSING
This letter reflects the information provided at the preapplication conference and is intended to assist you in
preparing plans and materials for formal application. We hope you found the comments useful to your project.
We have made every effort to identify major issues to eliminate surprises during the city's review of the formal
application. The completion of the preapplication process in the content of this letter does not vest any future
project application. Comments in this letter are only valid for one year as per FWRC 19.40.070(4).
As you know, this is a preliminary review only and does not take the place of the full review that will follow
submission of a formal application. Comments provided in this letter are based on preapplication materials
submitted.
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
Mr. Eric Labrie
Page 18 of 18
September 18, 2017
Modifications and revisions to the project as presented for this preapplication may influence and modify
information regarding development requirements outlined above. In addition to this preapplication letter,
please examine the complete FWRC and other relevant codes carefully. Requirements that are found in the
codes that are not addressed in this letter are still required for your project.
If you have questions about an individual comment, please contact the appropriate department representative
noted above. Any general questions can be directed towards the key project contact, Senior Planner Stacey
Welsh, at 253-835-2634, or.stacev.welsh@cit roffederal%vay.com. We look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
Stacey Welsh, AICP
Senior Planner
enc: Bulletin 001 `Process III/IV Submittal Requirements'
Bulletin 002 `Mailing Labels'
Bulletin 003 `Master Land Use Application'
Bulletin 038 Boundary Line Adjustment'
Bulletin 042 `Parking Lot Design Criteria'
Bulletin 050 `SEPA Environmental Checklist'
Bulletin 071 `Forest Practices Application;
Bulletin 072 `Forest Practices Class IV -General'
ABE Definition
Lakehaven Map
Fire Access Policy
Gate Policy
Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner
Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer
Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District
Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue
Todd Olson, todd.olson tt mepranahan.com
Arthur Richey, 6245 South Victor Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136, arthunricheyi yita.cnm
File 17-103654-00-PC Doc ID: 76342
e �
Lakehaven
00
° 2154650010
00
2154800020 $„
54800040
32075
JZ21�54�8000030
„ 8"
8„ a
81,
c �
2154840010
32125
�a
4a
°
2154650060
2154650050
32125
2154840020
°p129
SirS„
.18
E, °
2154650090
2154650100
40
32229
„ 'ell
2154650080
32275 8,,
��� 3R
s" .y 8"
g„
°
2154650160
�
2154650110
2154650120
v
2154650180
1621049056
34001
NOTE: Lakehaven Water and Sewer
District neither warrants nor guarantees
the accuracy of any facility information
provided. Facility locations and conditions
are subject to field verification.
Davita Healthcare Office Park
17-103654-PC
0 200 400
Feet 8/15/2017
r
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC)
PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SIGN -IN SHEET
DaVita Healthcare Office Park OOML
17-1036544'C'
August 24_ 201.7
NAME
WITH
PHONE
Stacey Welsh
Community Development -Planning
/►^�6/r� hti�wn �G �1 � �K CAI >
d e 4.a
253-835-2634
Z55 31j3 3 0C
/YI`YR{ 6G Did!
►cas
a:7
zs3 3s-z��
SILA-V, CX s
,,
. �4 �v .
.
\Aj
so��
I-- -..
2 s-Ls� cts�l
16,tiA smoA
Zs� � �-79-Z
i ,3
mA-:. V%. ire:�
-
Ev&ht?
r
Fma
"rd D 0v°P
G i9 - PLw04a z_
be gAQk "JT
25 �83 �a8
�J l.,c.\ 5 �
�uh�lic. �i'�
Z 53- 83� "27►3
2-6
A,
L60C CBE
csz
f90Z EBE NVHVNVN 03W
i zax spa7!yve
Z07B6 uol0myseM —ao 1 00I e11-S'-W-d II IZ
DaVita CBO Expansion F-7 = =Af DA
Federal Way WA 11 f
08/14/17
Building Area: 200,OOOSF
k F i F
Level 1 30,000 7,
Level 2 85,000
ILE
Level 3 85,000
Parking
Minimum: 667 stalls
Bldg. site: 260 stalls
t� I
North ULZe Agn ctmilc
Total: 720 stalls
car
CITY OF
Federal Way
March 27, 2017
Jim Hilger
Chief Accounting Officer
DaVita
200016th St.
Denver, CA 80202
Jim:
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
Jim Ferrell, Mayor
In an effort to expedite the information you and I discussed regarding the future 324th road, please find the
following information.
Enclosed is a diagram that illustrates the realignment of the road. It is now aligned as straight from the east side
of Interstate 5 to Weyerhaeuser Way South. There will be no traffic circle through your proposed development
as previously illustrated. Additionally, 323`d will remain as it is today to serve the needs of your company.
To help meet your decision -making process timeline, the detail on the diagram does not yet have the dimension
of the street or corresponding setbacks, but that will be addressed in future planning. Additionally, it does not
illustrate a sound wall but that too will be included in future plans as we identified in our conversation.
Also, enclosed, per your organization's request, is a timeline for planning and permitting for your development.
As identified, it reconciles with your organization's timeframe moving forward.
I hope this meets your needs for the purposes of your company's internal discussions. If I can be of any
assistance, please contact my office.
Respectfully,
VZ Ferrell
Mayor
Attachments: Diagram of 324th alignment east of Interstate 5
Gantt charts for planning and permitting
r
M
ZLUO
omz
Wp�
O
N
M
TIMELINE FOR DAVITA REVIEW
Business Days Calendar Days Total
per Review per Review Calendar
Rpvinim Ctnop Time Reauired/Assumed Stage Stage Days
Preapplication submitted
3 weeks (Normal turnaround time)
15
21
21
Preapplication
Conference
DRC Meeting with applicant
2 weeks (Normal turnaround time)
10
14
14
DRC Letter sent to applicant
Assume 3 weeks to submit formal applkaiian
21
Formal application submitted
28 days to determine completeness'
20
28
28
Letter of Completeness Issued
14 days after Letter of Completeness Issued'
10
14
14
Land Use Review
Notice of Application Issued
Assume 4 weeks for staff review
20
28
28
15 Day Comment Period will run concurrently
SEPA Issued
21 Day Comment Period'
15
21
21
SEPA Comment Period Ends
14 Day Appeal Period'
10
14
14
SEPA Appeal Period Ends
Assume 2 weeks for staff review and
preparation of staff report
10
14
14
Use Process Decision Issued
14 Day Appeal Period'
10
14
14
Appeal Period Ends
Assume 4 weeks for preparation of building permit application
28
Building Permit Application
Submitted
Building Permit
3 months (Normal turnaround time) (Includes
Review
plumbing & electrical)
60
90
90
Building Permit Issued
Assume 2 weeks to begin construction
14
Construction Starts
18 months
549
Construction
Construction EndS2
6 weeks to set up furniture
42
Occupancy3
TOTAL
180
258
912
0.5 years
0.7 years
2.5 years
'Time based on City Code
zA Temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued at this stage if all life safety issues are addressed.
3A Certificate of Occupancy must be issued for the building to be open for business. Construction of an overhead pedestrian bridge will not affect occupancy, but may add to the overall
length of the project
§
§
z
�
�
\
I
cr
(
Ix
LU
Ld
�
k
|
�\
a■
�
K
�
K
�
}
|
■\
k\
E
\
!
)
;
|
7
�
`
,
�
�
`
|
ƒ
!
�
�
|
,\
7
:
-
|
•
■
�!
�
|.-
\
e f
,
!!
�
�
.
■
!
|
_
:
�
M-O
CITY OF
�. Federal
March 14, 2017
Jim Hilger
Chief Accounting Officer
DaVita
200016th St.
Denver, CO 80202
Jim:
Way
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www. cityoffederalway.. com
Jim Ferrell, Mayor
In an effort to expedite the information you and I discussed regarding the future 324th road, please
find the following information.
Enclosed is a diagram that illustrates the realignment of the road. It is now aligned as straight from the
east side of Interstate 5 to Weyerhaeuser Way South. There will be no traffic circle through your
proposed development as previously illustrated. Additionally, 323`d will remain as it is today to serve
the needs of your company.
To help you meet your decision -making process timeline, the detail on the diagram does not yet have
the dimensions of the street or corresponding setbacks, but that will be addressed in future planning.
Additionally, it does not illustrate a sound wall but that will be included in future plans, as well as
identified in our conversation.
I hope this meets your needs for the purposes of your company's internal discussions. If I can be of
any assistance, please contact my office.
Respectfully,
r ,
t i i m Ferrell
Mayor
Attachment: Diagram of 324th alignment east of Interstate 5
M
w
CITY OF
Federal Way
Mr. Arthur Richey
Senior Director of DaVita Development
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc.
2000 16,h Street
Denver, CO 80202
h •+r� [avi
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederaWay.com
Jim Ferrell, Mayor
August 10, 2016
Re: Timeline for the Review and Permitting for Construction of an Office Building in East Campus
Dear Mr. Richey:
We enjoyed meeting with you on July 21". Pursuant to your request during this meeting, the City has
prepared a timeline for you to achieve occupancy of your proposed building. Enclosed are timelines that
depict the process from the point of a preapplication conference to the occupancy of the building. The
timelines are graphically presented in either business days or calendar days, and by the four review stages:
Preapplication, Land Use Review, Building Permit, and Construction. They are illustrated by total calendar
days, or by weeks for each review stage.
Using the Federal Way Devised Code (FWRC), which sets out timeframes for review of development applications,
and based upon the time needed for construction and outfitting the building, it would result in a total of 912
calendar days, or 2.5 years.
This timeline is based on the following assumptions:
1. A complete application is submitted at every step of the process, i.e., at the preapplication
stage, formal application (land use process), and building permit application stage. This
means that all required materials and studies are submitted and during the City's review there
is no need to request additional information. This also means that the timeline does not
address review time associated with resubmitted materials.
2. There are no citizen -initiated appeals. Appeals can occur when a threshold determination
(SEPA decision) is issued and when the land use process decision is"issued.
3. Adverse weather conditions do not delay site work or construction.
As it pertains to your question on whether parking would be allowed as a stand-alone use on Lots F and I,
FWRC 19.130.110 would allow this based on the following language:
"(1) Unless otherwise specified in this title or modified in accordance with FWRC 19.130.090,
�IJj" the applicant shall provide the required number of parking spaces either:
Mr. Arthur Richey
Page 2 of 2
August 10, 2016
"(a) On the subject property; or
"(b) On a lot adjoining the subject property, if that lot is in a zone that permits
the use conducted on the subject property.
"(2) If the parking is located on a lot other than the lot containing the use which generates the
parking space requirements, the owner o� of contain>n, the park[n must sia
covenant or other instrument, in a Form acceptable to the city attorney, teQuiring that the
lot be devoted in whale or in part to required parking for the use on another lot. The
applicant must recoxd tlus statement with the county to run with all affected properties."
According to FWRC 19.05.010, the definition of adjoining is as follows:
"`Adjoining' means property that touches or is directly across a street from the subject property.
For the purpose of height regulations, any portion of a structure which is 100 feet or more from
a low density zone is not considered to be adjoining that zone."
If parking is proposed for Lots F and I, there would need to be a Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) to
remove the interior lot lines. Alternatively, parking could be provided on Lots K and L, with a BLA being
done to remove the interior lot lines between Lots H, IC, and L.
ff
, in reviewing whether there were any critical areas on the lots, City zoning maps and the binding site
for this property illustrate that there is a small wetland and a stream to the east of Lots K and L, which
eed to be addressed.
We hope that we have answered all of your questions and look forward to working with you. We also hope
that the prepared timelines are helpful in facilitating planning on your side. Please contact Principal Planner
Margaret Clark, AICP, at 253-835-2646, or near¥arc t.clirkc rr ritv�sFFedcrahvay.ct�m, if you have any comments
and/or questions regarding this letter.
Enclosures
c: Jim Ferrell, Mayor
Brian Wilson, Chief of Staff
Tim Johnson, Economic Development Director
Marwan Salloum, Public Works Director
E.J. Walsh, Deputy Public Works Director
Margaret Clark, AICP, Principal Planner
080916 Corresponden—docs
DatabaseID=59333 E2120202A2B4A4A5520I ContactID=30303037373 937393 3303435 INN
February 8, 2000
Mr. Cary M. Roe
City of Federal Way
33530 1st Way S
Federal Way, WA 98003
Dear Cary:
The Quadrant Corporation ("Quadrant") would like to proceed with completing the Voluntary Payment Agreements
for payment of Traffic Improvement Plan fees ("TIP fees") on two commercial sites we are developing in the City
of Federal Way ("the City"). The subject properties are East Campus Parcel 1 (Application No: SEP98-0039) and
East Campus Corporate Park Lot 93 (Application No: SEP98-0015). Quadrant would like to pay the TIP fees for
each site in annual installments over either three or four years, as detailed below, beginning with first building
occupancy. In the case of Parcel 1, that date is February 2000; for Lot #3, that date is March 2000. The proposed
schedules are reasonably tied to possible building occupancies.
Under the terms of the Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance ("MEDNS") for East Campus
Parcel 1, dated February 9, 1999, issued by the City (copy attached), the applicant is required to either construct
certain TIP projects listed in the MEDNS or fund the project's pro rata share of the TIP projects costs. The project's
TIP fees total $1,060,400. The Binding Site Plan for Parcel 1 was recorded on September 16, 1999. The first
building being built in Parcel 1 is for Capital One and is scheduled to be completed in February 2000. Quadrant is
requesting the City to agree to accept payment of the TIP fees based on the following schedule:
Payment Date
Amount Due
February 8, 2000
$265,100
February 8, 2001
$265,100
February 8, 2002
$265,100
February 7, 2003
$265,100
Total:
$1,060,400
Quadrant shall pay the amounts indicated in the above table on the dates listed to satisfy the TIP fee requirement for
Parcel 1. However, Quadrant hereby grants the City the right to request payment of, and Quadrant agrees to pay,
the February 7, 2003 payment of $265,100 during the year 2000 if the City commences construction of the 23rd
Avenue South road improvements during 2000. Such acceleration of the February 2003 payment shall be in
addition to the scheduled Year 2000 payment. If the City does not commence construction of the 23rd Avenue
South road improvements during 2000, then the payment dates shall remain as shown in the above table.
Under the terms of the Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance ("MEDNS") for East Campus
Corporate Park Lot #3, dated September 2, 1998, issued by the City (copy attached), the applicant is required to
either construct certain TIP projects listed in the MEDNS or fund the project's pro rata share of the TIP projects
costs. The project's TIP fees total $296,300. The Binding Site Plan for Lot 3 will be recorded this spring. The
first building on Lot 3 is being built for Weyerhaeuser and is scheduled to be completed March 2000. Quadrant is
requesting the City to accept payment of the TIP fees based on the following schedule:
Payment Date
Amount Due
March 1, 2000
$148,150
March 1, 2001
$74,075
March 1, 2002
$74,075
Total:
$296,300
In consideration for the City's willingness to agree to these payment schedules rather than require payment in full at
the time of building permit issuance, and to facilitate construction of the capital improvements identified in the two
MEDNS documents„ Quadrant hereby waives and releases on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns all
rights to receive a refund of fees paid or interest thereon if the City does not spend these fees within five years of
receipt, as otherwise required under City code. This waiver and release shall be effective for 10 years from the date
of the City's receipt of the last payment as set forth above, and shall be a covenant running with the land and inure
to the benefit of and bind Quadrant's successors, heirs and assigns.
As additional consideration for the City's willingness to agree to these payment schedules, and to allow the City to
proceed with construction of certain of the traffic improvement projects identified in the MEDNS for each project,
Quadrant agrees as follows: The City may apply Quadrant's annual TIP fees to any one or more of the traffic
improvement projects identified in the two MEDNS documents, provided that, at the conclusion of construction of
the identified projects, Quadrant's combined contribution to any one traffic improvement project shall not exceed
the combined percentage of Quadrant's proportional share of such project for Parcel 1 and Lot #3, as set forth in the
MEDNS documents. This requirement is not affected by the waiver of refund rights contained in the preceding
paragraph.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. By signing on the joint signature lines provided below, Quadrant
and the City agree that this letter constitutes a Voluntary Payment Agreement for East Campus Parcel 1 and Lot 3
developments. Quadrant waives and releases, for itself and its successor and assigns, any claim or challenge to the
traffic mitigation required by the two MEDNS documents, or to the legality of this Voluntary Agreement. This
waiver shall also a covenant running with the land and inure to the benefit of and bind Quadrant's successors, heirs
and assigns.
Notice of the waivers contained herein, in a form acceptable to the City and Quadrant, shall be recorded with the
King County Auditor within thirty (30) days of the date of this Agreement.
Sincerely,
Patrick S. Malley
Assistant Vice President
AGREED:
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
By: _
David H. Moseley
City Manager
THE QUADRANT CORPORATION
By:
George F. Sherwin, Jr.
Vice President
Attachments: MEDNS for East Campus Parcel 1, dated February 9, 1999
MEDNS for East Campus Corporate Park Lot #3, dated September 2, 1998
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this day, personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, David H. Moseley, to me known to be the City Manager of the City of
Federal Way, a Washington municipal corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument.
Given under my hand and official seal this day of l� 2000.
(notary signature)
(typed/printed name of notary)
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington.
My commission expires:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
On this day personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, George F. Sherwin, Jr., to me known to be the Vice President
of Quadrant Corporation, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed, if any,
is the corporate seal of said corporation.
GIVEN my hand and official seal this day of , 2000.
(notary signature)
(typed/printed name of notary)
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington.
My commission expires.-
.cceipt, as otherwise required undgr City code_ This waiver and release shall beef" '}ve for 10 years from the date
of the City's receipt of the last 1,ncnt as set forth above, and shall be a covenant i..,ining with the land and inure
to the benefit of and bind Quadrant's successors, heirs and assigns.
As additional consideration for the City's willingness to agree to these payment schedules, and to allow the City to
proceed with construction of certain of the traffic improvement projects identified in the MEDNS for each project,
Quadrant agrees as follows: The City may apply Quadrant's annual TIP fees to any one or more of the traffic
improvement projects identified In the two MEDNS documents, provided that, at the conclusion of construction of
the identified projects, Quadrant's combined contribution to any one traffic improvement project shall not exceed
tite combined percentage of Quadrant's proportional share of such project for Parcel I and Lot #3, as set forth in the
MEDNS documents_ This requirement is not affected by the waiver of refund rights contained in the preceding
paragraph.
Thank you for your consideration of this request, By signing on the joint signature lines provided below, Quadrant
and the City agree that this letter constitutes a Voluntary Payment Agreement for East Campus Parcel 1 and Lot 3
developments. Quadrant waives and releases, for itself and its sticcessor and assigns, any claim or challenge to the
traffic mitigation required by the two MEDNS documents, orto the legality of this Voluntary Agreement. This
waiver shall also a covenant running with the land and inure to the benefit of and bind Quadrant's successors, heirs
and assigns.
Notice of the waivers contained herein, in a form acceptable to the City and Quadrant, shall be recorded with the
King County Auditor within thirty (30) days of the date of this Agreement
Sincerely,
Patrick S, all
Assistant is ProsCent
CITY q DE l AY THE QUADRANT CO OR.A
By By:
David . Moscrcy George F. herwin, Jr.
City Manager Vice President
Attachments: MEDNS for East C pus Parcel I, dated February 9, 1999
MEDNS for East Ca pus Corporate Park Lot #3, dated September 2, 1999
Map 64
Re
co
} E 3
s§5>$ -
�
E [ sm
°a'ass sso�seagN _ m9 -� � gang -a III v Be _a M
e'9 fdi aSS 5 9 r ar yg � ��$ �_� `3i � Uj;-i
� � # s: � t � a ## # g . e "LL #_ �$E `��. �g$ s-• § � r' �B$ s` 3asa2s - �4�� �r �ksg� fee_ $:
Q�Q�Qe�I 1 A
00 m'9�ga'l�E: aE:g�Safsge:
s
z
5�1
CL
m
2
c
0
N
3:
OFU
L
LL
Map 68
5. ¢ F i� $ ? t g g :d. LLLLLL es • �� & i h �; .s`Hit! a �
31
29$gg �� g€' a s�.�cd we�a ge3g sE�B+! • a
adG£sr3i$sfR
c 00 .11D0flEQ }eu u��000a�� t . .a�.p
»aYaeT: £'ijLiF
_
mz 5
LL w=xtiKW�
.16 U
U
om X1! WARY RU
RR ed
1slllttfR ' - n: +"'J
yyo
9 AV HIYC ` 8 AY Hlii S AY HJ,6i
�•I Iy i I €
i N inla t..:
M
y
i f
•',I ! CO -
1 Miit 1 y
I.
7
s
1 � -
0
s AM 213sn3VHM3A3M
N r- d '.
v/ I •�,� � N
ly al
•, i N
cj
i
a
V
V
1
m 3
3m3o�
"mama
Page 1 of 1
" vj
http://gismaps.kingcounty. gov/arcgis/rest/directories/arcgisoutput/Printing/PrintingService_... 8/4/2017
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL
DATE: 8-4-17
TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager
Peter Lawrence, Plans Examiner
Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer
Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District
Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue
FROM: Stacey Welsh, Planning
FOR DRC MTG. ON: 8-17-17 - Internal
8-24-17, 9:00 - with applicant
FILE NUMBER(s): 17-103654-PC
RELATED FILE NOS.: None
PROJECT NAME: DAVITA HEALTHCARE OFFICE PARK
PROJECT ADDRESS: NO SITE ADDRESS
PARCEL NUMBERS: 215465-0060, -0090, -0110, -0120
ZONING DISTRICT: OP-1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development of approximately 180,000 square feet of
office space and associated parking on 5.2 acres.
LAND USE PERMITS: TBD
PROJECT CONTACT: Eric LaBrie
ESM
33400 8th Ave S., Suite 205
Federal Way, WA 98003
MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master Land Use Application
Cover Letter
Statement of Architectural Intent
Aerial Photo
Conceptual Site Plan
CITY OF
L Federal Way
August 4, 2017
Mr. Eric LaBrie
ESM Consulting Engineers LLC
33400 81h Avenue South, Suite 205
Federal Way, WA 98003
Re: File #17-103654-PC; PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED
Davita Healthcare Office Park, No Site Address, Federal Way
Dear Mr. LaBrie:
CITY HALL
33325 8th Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
(253) 835-7000
www.cityoffederalway.com
Jim Ferrell, Mayor
FILE
The Community Development Department is in receipt of your preapplication conference request. The
application has been routed to members of the Development Review Committee and a meeting with the
project applicant has been scheduled as follows: .
9:00 a.m. — Thursday, August 24, 2017
Hylebos Conference Room
Federal Way City Hall, 2-1 Floor
33325 81h Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003
We look forward to meeting with you. Please coordinate directly with anyone else you would like to attend
the meeting as this will be the only notice sent by the department. If you have any questions regarding the
meeting, please contact me at stacey.welsli ci ityoffederaliy y.com, or 253-835-2634.
Sincerely,
Stacey Welsh, AICP
Senior Planner
c: Arthur Richey, 6245 South Victor Avenue, Tulsa, OK 74136
D.c LU. 76341
Filc 17-103653-00-VC
OF 40;ttt�
Federal Way
41kL
MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
C 1 V E D 33325 8'' Avenue South
Federal Way, WA 98003-6325
117 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609
JUL. 3uay Mx tvoffedemlwav,com
CITY OF FEDERAL W4Y
001AMUNIT� DEVELOPIAEPT
APPLICATION NO(S) .5 q - p Date July za, zon
Project Name Davita Healthcare Office Park
Property Address/Location S 3 3 Federal W WA
Parcel Number(s) 215465-0060. -0090 -0110 -0120
Project Description The groiect will include development of approximately 180,000 square feet of
new office space for Davita Healthcare.
EASE PRINT
Type of Permit Required
Annexation
Binding Site Plan
Boundary Line Adjustment
Comp Plan/Rezone
Land Surface Modification
Lot Line Elimination
x Preapphoation Conference
Process I (Director's Approval)
Process II (Site Plan Review)
_ Process III (Project Approval)
_ Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision)
Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone)
Process VI
SEPA w/Project
- SEPA Only
Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use
Short Subdivision
Subdivision
Variance: Commercial/Residential
Required Information
OP-1 Zoning Designation
Office Park Comprehensive Plan Designation
Value of Existing Improvements
Value of Proposed Improvements
International Building Code (IBC):
8 Occupancy Type
11-B Construction Type
Applicant
Name: Arthur Richey
Address: 6245 S Victor Ave
City/State: Tulsa, OK
Zip: 74136
Phone: 918-810-3700
Fax:
Email: arthur.rich @davi ,
Signature: /_
Agent (if different than
Name: Eric LaBne C/O ESM Consulting Engineers, LLC
Address: 33400 8th Ave S, Suite 205
City/State: Federal Way, WA
Zip: 98003
Phone: 253-838-6113
Fax: 253-838-7104
Email: eric.labrie(&esmcivil.com
Signature:
Owner
Name: Genesis KC Development, LLC
Address: Same As Above
CityiState:
Zip.
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Signature:
Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\HandoutslMaster Land Use Application
July 28, 2017
Mr. Robert "Doc" Hansen
Planning Manager
City of Federal Way Department of
Community Development
33325 8'h Ave. S.
Federal Way, WA 98003
CONSULTING ENGINEERS. LLC
Job No. 1884-001-015
RE: Request for Pre -Application Conference CITY OF FEDERAL WAYDaVita Healthcare, Corporate Business Office ,XJM14iUPJITY DEVELOPMENT
Dear Mr. Hansen:
Please accept this letter and the attached information as our request to schedule a pre -
application meeting with City staff to discuss development of a new ±200,000 SF
corporate office building and associated parking within the East Campus Corporate Park,
in City of Federal Way. The following information is included with this letter and meets the
requirements as outlined in the City's Pre -Application Conference Checklist:
1. Complete Master Land Use Application.
2. Check in the amount of $491.70.
3. Site Plan Q copies).
4. Statement of Architectural Design Intent.
Upon your review of this information, we would appreciate scheduling the meeting at the
earliest available time.
PROJECT NARRATNE
DaVita, Inc. currently houses a portion of their corporate offices in an existing building
located at 32275 32"d Ave S. As the company continues to grow, they have decided to
expand their corporate footprint in the City of Federal Way by creating a campus -like
development utilizing the existing building and adjacent vacant land.
To accomplish this vision, DaVita recently purchased the four existing, undeveloped lots
adjacent to the intersection of 32" d Avenue S and S 323'd Street, and next to their existing
offices. These lots are known as King County tax parcels 215465-0110, -0120, -0060 and -
0090, which include approximately 5.2 acres of OP-1 zoned property in the East Campus
Corporate Park. DaVita intends to build a new office building to house corporate activities
on the northern two lots, and construct additional parking necessary to support this
building on the southern two lots.
ESM Fe[l!ral Way
33400 8th Ave S, Ste 205
Federal Way, WA 98003
253.838.6113 tel
800345.5694 toll free
253:838,7104 fax
ESM Everett
1010 SE Everett Mall Way, Ste 210
Everett, WA 98208
425.297.9900 tel
800.345.5694 toll free
475. 747. 9901 fax
Mr. Robert "Doc" Hansen
July 28, 2017
Page 2
The proposed office building will consist of two stories and may incorporate a portion of
underground parking beneath the building to take advantage of the existing topography.
The off -site parking lot is proposed to be an expansion of the existing DaVita parking lot to
the west, and connect via sidewalks and pedestrian pathways in order to serve both
buildings.
LAND USE AND ZONING
The project is located in the OP-1 zone, which is further defined and regulated by the
Weyerhaeuser Company Concomitant Pre -Annexation Zoning Agreement, dated August
23, 1994 as well as the 1994 Federal Way City Code. As such, the basic development
standards include the following:
Allowed Use: Office
Accessory Use: Parking lot, if approved by the Director
Development Stnds: OP zone, as defined by the 1994 FWCC
Building Height: 35' from average building elevation, plus 1' of height for
every 1' of additional setback provided.
Front Yard: 50', including a 25' of landscaping.
Side Yard: 20'
Rear Yard: 20'
Parking: 1 stall/300 sf of gross floor area for Office uses.
We anticipate that the project will undergo land use review as a Process III application as
we do not anticipate any critical areas to exist on site. If critical areas are discovered and
impacts are unavoidable, the project would then be required to be reviewed as a Process
IV application with the decision being made by a Hearing Examiner after a public hearing.
TRANSPORTATION
Vehicular access is proposed directly from 32nd Avenue S and S 323`d Street, and will also
include internal connections to the existing DaVita parking lot. Since 32"d Avenue S, S
323`d Street and the intersection roundabout have all been fully constructed, and there are
no more undeveloped parcels along either roadway, we do not anticipate the need to
provide any additional dedication or frontage improvements along these streets.
Furthermore, we do not anticipate the need to provide any additional dedication or
improvements for the extension of S 323`d Street across the subject property as depicted
in the City's Comprehensive Plan. This position is consistent with a letter from the Mayor
to Jim Hilger with DaVita, Inc. dated March 14, 2017.
STORMWATER
The entire East Campus Corporate Park was originally designed to direct current and
future stormwater flows to the existing detention pond located to the east of this site. The
pond is privately owned and maintained by the East Campus Corporate Park Owners'
Association.
We understand that new development is not vested to the prior stormwater regulations;
therefore, the project will be designed to meet the 2016 King County Stormwater Manual
as amended and adopted by the City of Federal Way. At this time, we expect to be able to
modify the current pond to provide the additional capacity and water quality necessary to
meet current standards. We also recognize that additional water quality facilities may be
required in the incorporated into the project's design.
Mr. Robert "Doc" Hansen
July 28, 2017
Page 3
CRMCAL AREAS
No critical areas have been identified or delineated on the property. We will engage a
wetland biologist and a geotechnical engineer to review the site for potential critical areas
and plan to submit formal reports with the land use application.
ACHTECTURAL DESIGN INTENT
Please refer to the enclosed letter from McGranahan Architects regarding the building's
construction type, occupancy and design intent.
Please refer to the attached site plan for further information and reference. If you have any
questions, please feel free to contact me at 253-838-6113.
Sincerely,
ESM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC
�d
ERIC G. LaBRIE, A.I.C.P.
President
Enc: As noted
CC: Jim Hilger, DaVita
Arthur Richey, DaVita
Mark Kinney, DaVita
Todd Olsen, McGranahan Architects
Ilesm8leng6esm-jobs11884100110151documentlletter-001.docx
2111 Pacific, Suite 100 Tacoma, Washington 98402
July 28, 2017
Mr. Eric LaBrie, AICP
President
ESM Consulting Engineers
33400 8th Ave South, Suite 205
Federal Way, WA 98003
Re: DaVita Healthcare, Corporate Business Office
Dear Eric,
McG RANAHAN architects
RECEIVED
3UL 31 26V
CITY OF FFDERAL WAY
GqM}ylUNiTy OEVEL.OPMENT
The following Statement of Architectural Design Intent has been developed for the proposed corporate
office building for DaVita Healthcare identified in your Request for Pre -Application Conference letter
dated July 28, 2017.
SITE PLAN — CONSTRUCTION TYPE AND OCCUPANCY
■ Construction Type II - B
■ B Occupancy (Office and ancillary uses)
OTHER INFORMATION — STATEMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN INTENT
The proposed structure will be two stories in height consisting of between 160,000 and 200,000 gross
building square feet and will house, as its primary tenant, a corporate business office and its ancillary
uses.
The building will be sited with its primary entrance facing 32nd Avenue South, with a strong visual and
pedestrian connection to the existing office building located to the southwest of the site. The primary
building elevations (facing 32nd Ave S and S. 323rd Street) will be modulated to reduce apparent scale and
will feature elements such as overhangs, window articulation, and /or material or color changes to
emphasize building entries or internal program components.
Exterior finishes and colors will be compatible with the neighboring office building development west
and south of 32nd Avenue S, and may include natural tones of brick, light painted concrete, and neutral
metal panel cladding along with continuous aluminum framed storefront glazing system. Typical glazing
will be tinted to maximize solar performance, with clear glazing used at primary and secondary entry
points.
,7o6.000
253 7
383 3084
253 F
3
www.mcgranahan.com
Mr. Eric LaBrie
July 28, 2017
Page 2
Pedestrian access will be emphasized leading to the building, with accessible pathways separated from
parking circulation and a pedestrian plaza at main entry. Landscaping elements will also focus on
pedestrian interaction and views to natural plantings and/or courtyards.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments concerning this narrative.
Sincerely,
McGranahan Architects
Todd Olson, AIA
Senior Project Manager
Distributions: Marc Gleason, McGranahan Architects
Seong Shin, McGranahan Architects
3
n
40
0
z o
m —
W
m n
� Z
a4 1+
Ln Ln
n -n
� d
a a
Ln LA
6.
11 11
N V
W G4
A GV1
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Ln U'1 In Ln In w Ln Ln LM Ln In Ln w Ln Ln (n Ln In
A A A A A 4�:- -Pb ? A A .0- A A A A A A A
lLi'i Lri UOi L i Uri LnLn u�i O O O O A Lm Ln Ln Ln
6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
6 6 6 O O O F� 6 O O O O O 6 O O O
00 D1 N F m lD Fi w Ln w N FA N O w Ln F
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
w w w w w w w w w
N N N N N N N N N
O O O 00 N N V N O
ONi O A 0o tD %D In Ln F
w w w w c< w w w
N N N N N N N
a a a aa a a
< < < < S � � � < < <
m m m m N m m m
Ln LA (n LnO r_ Ln Ln (n
V1 fn
m m
C� Zcc
G C
� D)
N N
� �
v v -0 -0 < < � -0 n O O v C 0 —, r+
a� v c O O n D C m M <
v v 7 r+
m n ° 0h' ° ° ram+ .�+ W = m a 3 fD m v
_= m m r < D r 0 °°
!J fJ m rD n n < d
�
r° m o�i w 03 3 m m c D m r
< '+ r* < z< r+ v m O O p
\ v v \ 3 �, N
a ao 00 p p a n O °' O
O -• r+ n
co N N
m n 0 v
v m' v D
m m a p
< (D r n
v+ v+ r d
D h D n
fD
m = m
v v
n
n
n
n
F+
V
QO
QC
�
QO
V
V
V
V
�--� f-+ s•+ w 1V fl0 m O
LD TQ C} N O 0 m LD Un
V't O A 00 N A 07 O] W
O Owo A O m M1-1 p C)
N N N N N N 1--k N N
O O O O O O � O O
W V II
m lD W
W O O O O A w m kD In O w 0 V
D
a
a
(D
CA
'+
K
m
—. O
CP
a,
rn
0o
ao
D
a m
o
"•
O rnr
w
pnl
O
O
rr
,O+ �
Ln
M
7
7
pq
Ocu
v
r+
O
�n
ID
ID
O
ffDD
O
O
Ln
m
0►
O
1++
m
-n
..
lD
W
00
3
n
D
O
Q
kD
aq
�
rr
fD
-i
D
of
fD
v
ffDD
a
cr
(n
w
C1
O
m
F+
A
Ln
M
O
O
O
0o
Ql
00
O
lD O
7
N
O
G1
0
c
a
w
m
a
Ln
m
a
N
F,
lD
W
00
File No: 17-103654-PC
Project Name: Davita Healthcare Office Park HQ
Project Description: Development of approx. 180,000 to 200,000 square feet HQ office space
Meeting Date: August 17, 2017 3:30-4:30
Staff attending: Marwan, Rick, EJ, Cole, Kevin and Sarady
Traffic Mitigation — Don't charge TIF on the development. Parcel 1 BSP paid $1,060,400 pro-rata
mitigation based on 700,000 sq. ft. office and up to 1,109 pm trips. Do not charge of if the total
development or trips below the approved SEPA (SEP98-0039). With proposed development, the total
office development for Parcel 1 is 687,676 sq. ft. and 1,073 pm trips.
S 324th St. extension and Frontage Improvements - Letters from Mayor dated March 14, 2017 and
March 27, 2017 to Jim Hilger identified S 323rd Street will remain as it is today and S 324th St. will now
aligned as straight from SR 5 to Weyerhaeuser Way South.
Amend S 324th St. CIP project description in the Comp. Plan to be consistent with the new
alignment. Rick will work with Margaret to incorporate into this year Comp Plan amendment.
- S 324th Street extension will go straight and therefore the development will not be subjected any
street improvements or right-of-way dedication. However, a 20' non -motorized path per code
from 32"d Ave S to property line will be required concurrent with the development.
- Frontage Improvements and right-of-way dedication per code along frontage on 32"d Ave S and
S 323`d St. including the pond parcel. Frontage improvement shall be to a Type "K" street, which
shall also include a 9-foot row dedication. Applicant will need to submit a modification request.
Pedestrian connections will be needed in order to connect the new building and the parking lot
across the street. This may include modifying the roundabout to include RRFB for safe
pedestrian access.
- The existing driveway onto the roundabout may need to be modified to accommodate
additional traffic.
A second driveway for the parking may be necessary due to traffic and should be located further
east. Line up with the driveway for the building.
�, � 13 •L�j' 7 �c..QvSr�-2 G✓ri 55..►ti •.1 \`
Page 1 of 1
I
http://gismaps.kingcounty. gov/arcgis/rest/directories/arcgisoutput/Printing/PrintingService_... 8/4/2017
4 ." - 7r J I • 'C9c �:a::r•5 � _ - ++ 1 � �.; :L x•7i•I I r
l
FEDERAL WAY CITY CENTER ACCESS �T a: 4:1n 4 7 t f ti
I ALTERNATIVE 2 - SOUTH CITY CENTER E•"� �' '� !i 1
SOUTH 324TH STREET INTERCHANGE
•la�r.=9:4
0 :`•rL:Gd"• tic 5515�bualK 5�S55nalt9 551 �•i7Cl''6� �Ifiso253n
{ _ «fro � �,� � �F 6 l'� � '" - � !• I
oFOSEO NUMIG L n92104 v172MO—
�M
_ 4 I! S;it5bCV10"
27,
- -- FIRST DRAFT _ _ - _ _�.
I.rty JUNE 10,MII .� _ _, - _ i' �I 'LI-
, } 1I
SCALE IN FEET � �• ' - -
�_
l- - - _ _ n �.S y_91_. I ' y
.:L'240f!Ol'.-_224C1',015-G22400J - f "I•' - - ;
`I 7E2S=0nG l8 � r�. .S9fGiV 55 _" \.
4G50.50 ....In5Y5i
, I 'MTpm11.7TC�MbA]I0M .. ►++��� . :J3FTr5NJ� - , !� T' • 152iU•49f�i15 usy.::
er
ow -
•__.l
L o21!s79021, 7971PIIC525 f: �' _ ." _ - .�� 650!
- Ir� f _ � � - • � .� - _ - _ • s'C.. .Y �. r [ - 3?�:o5nc
, �4 • S' ." . - :. _ . --- _ _ - ... T � { - HH','��. �211r,.`_02
u f
• _ i ++ . _ 1 � rr� "../ +� r �Y. - - 't �_s•IFsuose }
11 I ` c1155T4
75�24!101779 _ _....
TARGET .._.--._ie - _ ...
1 54'-
1 ". _ _ '• ~�_ �, _ - I - - _ - gr zISJES£GAP -.. y
71
Tu
+ I•uT[NTIAL - 'r s - •_" ` _'••t'�� 1 r ._ _ 1
. S STOR"ATER _ _ _ • 1 i r _ ,} - _
METRO TRANSIT CENTER - - y - 1
- ti' • I rorruni�� _an!'.:,, d - - ;;>^ - ." _ _ r � r -,iar. �_. - - - rr ., r
._ � - �- -. - ' • " _ • 'ifOPMMAIYf - _ - - 1� f!-. � _ - r tip; -
' .__._.. _-._. _... �[. �,� - f .. - _ _ � 'r f' i •L,; werEgx!,usrtu,on: � _ -- i ��'"—r _r' - ._ -. _�•���' - ,
- •!ti � �• ~� �_ _ __ ___ _ _ - - •� - - 7.1 r 'i• ; Q � � - p{T�TIIg1yA� f - _-�
,AI 2154550110� 1:4• ' r,. �,. �r -�I"
'-_ .e _ _ _ - r• 'yF ^ .' T* �' Is?1049937
- r- ' I - - 1. y p - OF[BI1 lRE/L1N
1 / / I
_
- - _... /0�. _
I - � _ •_ _ .. __ a .. .._ I?„i,: _'i.ti yl - - .� _---- ----- '.'a uaFi•sT"•^`-�' --- � - -- I �5_i0A
• _ 1 _ 1
}°
j • •. ." „ +_ . MOf9LE HOME NNn � •] JI I - .---_
a POTENTIAL STORWATER \\
DETENTION SITE
:I I
I _ r
^.. f � i5cln•�i2r1 l`I
T :M�
-•-••- - - 1
POTENTIALSTORMWATER�
DETENTION SITE
ASSUMED LOCATION - -- -
,g I OF OLYMPM PIPELINE i
it
13
• ---• � / I` �� all •�� - - - •-_ — '
'�� ; t• ; _` S 323R❑ ST
EXISTINGDAVITA
'k a OFFICES
� i e
..tits '324 `S7 - �
_
�r ---- 4 .- ---- _: ..- _- -. -_-__ =:__ __ _ ___---- - r:5 324#h STr:_
IL
.LL
J NON -MOTORIZED TRAIL INTERSECTION
CONNECTIVITY TO 32ND AVE TO BE DETERMINED CONTROL TO BE
DETERMINED
o goo zoa
J SCALE IN FEET
I
'-- �-- -- ..-.------------------------------------------------------------------• - - - - - ------------------ .............. •'----......----.---------------
.._..",
CONCEPTUAL EXTENSION OF S 324TH STREET TO WEYERHAEUSER WAY
3/9/2017
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN (TIP) - 2018 TO 2025
Map
ROADWAY CAPITAL PROJECTS
IDS"
Location
Description
Previous Years
2017
1a
City CenterAcoess Phase 1 - Environmental
Update environmental documentation for modified access at S 320th St & S 324th St
1b
City Center Access Phase 2 - S 320th St @
1-5 Bride
Add HOV lanes on S 320th St, realign ramps in SE quadrant
2
S 352nd St: SR 99 - SR 161
Extend 3 lane prinapal collector and signal at SR-99
4,519
3
SW 320th St a 47th Ave SW
Install traffic signal
4
S 312th St @ 28th Ave S
Add SB right -turn lane or construct roundabout
5
SW 340th St: 37th Ave SW - Ci Limits
Widen to 5 lanes
150
6
S 356th St: SR 99 - SR 161
Widen to 5 lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, illumination
974
5,
7
S 320th St & 1st Ave South
Add EBL, WBL, WBR, NBT, SBR; widen to 5 lanes N to 316 or Alternatlive Measure
569
8
SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase 5: S 340th St - S 356th St
Add HOV lanes, install raised median; turn lanes at 348th
4,680
6,
9
16th Ave S: S 344th St - S 348th St
Add SB auxiliary lane
10
Military Rd S @ S 298th St
Construct compact roundabout
11
Citywide
Implement Adaptive Traffic Control System
12
Citywide
Install variable lane use control signs
13
SW Campus Dr: 1st Ave S - 19th Ave SW
Overlay
14
16th Ave S: SR 99 - SR 18
Overlay
15
Military Rd S d S Star Lake Rd
Add EB right -turn lane, sidewalk
16
1st Ave S a SW 301st St
Install compact roundabout
17
SW 340th St: 31st Ave SW - 37th Ave SW
Widen to 5 lanes
Subtotal Roadway Capital Projects
10,892
12,
Map
NON -MOTORIZED CAPITAL PROJECTS
ID
Location
Description
Previous Years
2017
18
21 st Ave S: S 314th St - S 316th St
Pedestrian Connection
19
1st Ave S: S 292nd St - S 312th St
Shoulder improvements
20
21 st Ave S: S 316th St - S 320th St
Install sidewalk on west side
472
21
SR 509: 11th PI S - 16th Ave S
Install sidewalk on south side
1,200
22
Citywide Pedestrian Safety
Install mid -block crossing treatments
320
23
SR 509: SW 312th St - 21 st Ave SW
Install sidewalk and streetlights on south side
24
S 312th St: 24th Ave S - Steel Lake Park
Install sidewalk and streetlights on south side
100
25
S 312th St: Steel Lake Park - 28th Ave S
Install sidewalk and streetlights on south side
26
Cit ide
Implement greenway plan
27
16th Ave S Trail: S 284th St - SR 509
Construct multi -use path
Subtotal Non -Motorized Capital Projects
1 2,0921
2,
Map
STREET LIGHTING CAPITAL PROJECTS
ID
Location
I Description
Previous Years
2017
28
Citvwide
I LED Retrofits
100
200
Year 2017 Costs in $ th
2019 2020
000
5,612
569
771
1051 598
9001 900
2001 800
1,600
11,7651 4,5981 10,9521
Year 2017 Costs in a thousands
2018 1 2019 1 2020 1 2021
1
2023
62.1
7,913
4.105
2001 1,
150 700
500 1.500 4,
162 67,176 79,
2022 1 2023
650
320
300 1,918
1,670 3,620 620 2,238
Year 2017 Costs in $ thousands
2018 2019 2020 2021
3.200
otal
2.500
132.109
4.569
569
771
6,210
6,121
10,460
17,600
6,105
803
2.000
1.000
1,600
800
1,200
850
6,OOC
201,267
1,356
1.500
1.920
1,500
2,218
17,178
ota1
3,360
FWCP — Chapter Three, Transportation
Table III-]0
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) — 2016 to 2040
94-1 Ob SR 509: 9th PI S - 16th Ave S: Widen to 5 lanes. signal at 9th PI S
07-06 1st Ave S 0 SW 301st St: Install signal or roundabout
16-11 8th Ave S @ S 320th St: Add left -turn lanes NB, SB
16-13 S 324th St lnterd= e: Extend 5-lane minor arterial to 32nd Ave S
07-07 1 st Ave S [ S 308th St: Install si nal or roundabout
07-04 Military Rd S @ S 296th PI: Install signal or roundabout
16-18 l6th Av S a S 341st PL• Add signal
E
-01SR 99 S 288th St: Add NB ri t-tum lane
-32
E13th PI S: S 330th St - S 332nd St: Extend 3 lane collector
94-24 14th Ave S: S 312th St - S 316th St: Ring Road extension
93-08 S 316th St: SR 99 - 11 th PI S: kinRoad extension
01-05 SR 99 a S 312th St: Add 2nd NB left -turn lane (6)
07-22 16th Ave S: SR 99 - SR 18: Add HOV lanes
City Center Access (Phases 1 and 2): S 320th St @ I-5 Bridge Widening: Add HOV
lanes through interchange, reconstruct SE quadrant of interchange to realign ramps
02-01 (la & lb)
10-01 S 373rd Ste SR99: Add Signal or roundabout or two-way left -turn lane
05-03 Weyerhaeuser Wy S @ S 344th W : Install roundabout 16)
05-01 SR 509 t, 4th Ave S: Install roundabout
07-03 30th Ave S to, S 288th St: Install si al or roundabout
98-1 Oc IOth Ave SW et SW Campus Drive: Add SB ri ht-turn lane (2)
16-09 SR 99 ct S 312th St: Add 2nd left -turn lane EB, WB, and WB right -turn lane
02-04 SR 18 re SR 161: Add 3rd thru lane NB, SB. 3rd left -turn laneNl3, SB
98-07 SW 336th W / SW 340th St: 26th PI SW - Hot Rd SW: Widen to 5 lanes (12)
98-15 Military Rd S: S 288th St - S 304th St: Widen to 5 lanes
07-01 S Star Lake Rd Q 25th Dr S: Install si znal or roundabout
Military Rd S @ S 288th St: Add 2nd left -turn lanes and right -turn lanes eastbound
16-02 and westbound
SW 344th St: 12th Ave SW - 21 st Ave SW: Extend 3-lane principal collector with
98-10a bike lanes, sidewalks (3
S 320th St @ 1 st Ave S: Add 2nd left lanes all legs, WB, SB right -turn lane. widen
99-02 1 st Ave S to 5 lanes to S 316th St (15)
98-01 S 304th St r SR 99: Add left -turn lanes on 304th
10-01 S Star Lake Rd: @ Milita : Add right -turn lane on S Star Lake Rd
16-15 SR 99 @ S 324th St: Add 2nd left -turn lanes NB, SB, and NB right -turn lane
21 st Ave SW a SW 336th St: Add 2nd left -turn lanes NB, SB, and SB right -turn
16-16 lane
00-12 S 308th St: 14th Ave S - 18th Ave S: Widen to 3 lanes
16-17 S 336th St: SR 99 - 20th Ave S. Widen to 5 Ianes, add 2nd left -turn lanes EB; WB
Revised 2015
8,794
404
485
404
404
404
452
4.797
5.472
8,291
6.708
482
1,763
404
1,229
1,696
12.210
21,821
23,450
404
2,326
I0,164
10,460
1,454
401
3,052
3.052
3.198
3,721
III-67
I
A - I RTI
I HEREBY DECLARE TO THE BEST OF WY KNOWLEDGE
THAT THE NFORMATION SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS. THE
.AS -CONSTRUCTED CONDITIONS" THIS CERTIFICATION
IS BASED UPON WORK PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GENERALLY ACCEPTED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
AND/OR_SURVEMNG PRACTICE,
R SCOTT g , LS, 0. 15DB1 -
DATE: ""- --
Py
A PORTION OF `_ 112 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 15 AND OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TWP. N., RGE. 4 E., W.M.
it INT'1I._ STA. 9+76.23 PUBLIC ROAD
- - - - - - - ` ••- - - - d STA 132+17.75, S 320TH ST.
SIORM MANAGE DITCH TO
CONNECT TO DETENTION
FACILi FY AS NECESSARY:
TO CONNECT TO LOTS A
AND 0: DITCH WILL CONNECT
TO SEDIMENT TRAP (CAWAL
ONE PLAINS) -
TRACT A
(COMMERCIALWOWNERS AASSOCIATION)
11,72 ACRES
f I
1 /
T_SEE SHEET C-11
TRACT E.
3.81 ACRES -.
DETENTION
FACILITY
4LAL OWNERS ASSOCIATION)
�__wT-__ --- �----- r _ .. 7'
in TODOOf d RL�-M1" ONLY
13' STORM
WATER PIPELINE
EASEMENT-
2.95 /CRES
MIN. F.F. ELEV. 460.00
1�1 t `fTEMPORARY DRAINAGE EASEMENT
/ f
D
j� ' 3.37 ACRES
MIN. F.F. ELEV. 459.00
EASEMENT
B
2.50 ACRES
MIN.:F.F. ELEV. 463.00
AREA AREA
WEST EAST
51 Ac. 1.99 Ac.
FUTUFE 40' INGRESS,
EGRESS AND UTILITIES
EASEMENT
�I
E
V'
:3.40 ACRES
MIN. F.F: ELEV. 462.00 ! L1
LU
AREA AREA
x
WEST EAST
0.97 Ac.: 2.43 Ac-
!Lv _H
r^
l;r'z
AREA p ; z AREA
WEST T ¢ ul EAST I
EASEMENT 7.66 Ac. I O : m 1.98 Ac.
H --� DB
9.64 ACRES
MIN. F.F. ELEV. 460.00
W r Y�RJ TALUS R CC%
042116-013
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TNA E N X Y 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION I$. TOWNSHIP
21. NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. LYING WESTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH
AND SOUTI.1 OF THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 320TH STREET: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF
VACATED 32ND AVENUE SOUTH ADJOINING ON THE WEST;
TOGETHER WTH "T PORTION OF THE NORTH 200 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 IN THE
NDRTHHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15. TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M LYING
WE57MY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED
32ND AVENUE SOUTH ADJOINING ON THE WEST;
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF TRACT 61, STATE PLAT IN SECTION 16 TOWNSHP 21 NORTH,
RANGE 4 Mr, W.M., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED 1N VOLUM$ 41 OF PLATS, PAGE 30.
REOMS OF KING COUNTY, WASHIIN TON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE
HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR5);
TOGETHER WITH THAT PMOH OF THE NORTHEAST l, OF THE NORTHFST 1/4 AND THE NORTH
NO
200 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST" /4 OF SFCTION 16, TOWNSHHIP 21 NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. IN( XINGG COUNTY WASHINLTON, LYING. EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY µARGIN OF PRIMARY
TOOGETHER WII H THATAY NO, I P�lRi330N F VACATED SOUTHERLY
32NO AVEWE AADIDINNIZGHcfty AONI THE
SOUTH 320TN STTEET.
ALL SITUATE IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
2.631CRES
IN.1 F.F. ELEV. 451.50 I
_ 11NOT
0.80 ACRES OF 'Cl-
TRACT B A -d
•
t.
' SURFACES FFRIW LOT C s ��/](WkZ1AHo o)
BE OIRECIEO TO TRACT 0 F
} I
COMMERCAL OWNERS AS$
WETLAND ROCK 4ING.
0.89 ACRES
C M
A
3.70 ACRES 1.81 ACRES
MIN. F.F. ELEV. 462.00
t
B 14,
W BAST CAl s'lj U-•
i I
'
I!
CJRPJRA-rE PAR-K
I1
(=p
PARCEL 1
pj
I!
Is
I I'
i U
T" CO1=
li ¢
F W G >r
r +• ,? it 3.13 ACRES N I rl I 3.35 ACRES 1-1 Lu
Ia MIN. F.F. ELEV. 451.00 W I I MIN. F.F. ELEV. w
W
30' UTILITY ` I
VoC EASEMETNi
1t
3.18 ACRES 1
MIN. F.F. ELEV. 453.00
F- Ill 1
W III I
Z OD
W UI II I
W II!!
S. 323rd ST. i
V) 1 II 1
" if [[-...III5
I_
J
2.87 ACRES
i MIN. F.F- ELEV. 428.00
ce �trA /z/ i
SEE SHEET�I/ r
f C-6 J !
cs Fly
TRACT D
3.81 ACRES
DETENTION
FACILITY f
(COMMERCIAL OWNERS PS TION) rr:
TRACT E % '
SEE -SHEET
C- 9
[ I • r�
�J�I�YrRr1ArU�rrt CTJ'. •r
cJJLDr 1�1'S N�JRTrI� J iC� TRACTS
042115-178
SEE SHEET
C-5
3.12 ACRES
MIN. F.F. ELEV. 442.00
PARCEL 2
THAT PORTION OK THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP
21 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. W.M. LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 32ND DRWE SOUTH
AND SOLRHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY MARGIN OF SOUTH 320TH STREET,
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 200 FEET OF THE SMMV43T 1/4 OF
THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANCE 4 EAST, W.M LYING
EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 32ND DRIVE SOUTH -
EXCEPT THE EAST 165 FEET THEREOF.
WARNING
CONSTRUCTION IS WITHIN THE VICINITY OF
A HIGH PRESSURE GAS LINE. CONTRACTOR
SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY.
n
SCALE: 1" = 100'
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
VERTICAL DATUM
HAVOI&M. CEODIM VERTICAL OATVM OF SSSp EHGVD29)
BENCH MARIL C11Y OF FEDFTW. WAY 6.1L N9. i T44,
LOCATED 0.20 MILE FAST WiERSECIVN OF 1-5
OVERPASS ANO OUT H 320TH STRCCT. UbNUI`S HT
1N CASE IN FRONT OF ORIMEWAY 10 HOUSE 13112
OH IKE NORTH 90E OT SWTH 320TH SIRFET.
TOP OF MONUMENT ELEV. = 462.933.
LEGEND
❑•f- STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1
&- STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 2
E- SANITARY SEWER
WATER LINE
RELOCATED GAS UNE (BY OTHERS)
- - - FUTURE R/W - TO BE APPROVED
UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL
B.S_B.L NOTE
50' FRONT 25' LANDSCAPING ADJACENT
20' SIDE YARD TO R.O.W,
20' REAR YARD
EAST r CAIMPUS
C17RPJRATr PARK
PARCEL 2
042115-005, 052, 0055, 179
-THESE PLANS ARE APPROVED
TO END OF CUR REFURN ONLY
l �r
I
I i•
I -
INT']C. STA -'0+32.21 PUBLIC
/r . S,A 95s80. TVETERHREVSER ''
NOTE:
SOUTH 320TH STREET AND WEYERHAEUSER
WAY SOUTH CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE
APPROVED UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL
WARNING
THE EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS
SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.
DEPTH IS UNKNOWN.
CALL 1-800-424-5555_
V PERMIT NO. BSP98-0003 I
OF FEDERAL
¢� -Z26 Lu
x
~ o
J p
m
m
S�
m N
s 3 m
0 10
c 3 m
m m
_ m
m m
� m
LL
Nz
0
x
m
O �>
M Q
LL O Q L
O O °C Y
v U��
Q J
Q ��v1
a. w
Z_
O U�
QW9
Lu
Qo
0. U
JOD ND.: "'`1 -922
DWG NAME: M-SD-02
DESIGNED NY: F00
DRAVIN DY: JMM
CHECKED BY:
DATE:
DATE OF
PRIN r:
1 C-2 2 -- 17 SHEETi
A PORTION OF . 112 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 15 AND OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TWP. _ A., RGE. 4 E., W.M.
- .¢_ �UiiVE TA
nA
R b SOD.
L - 79.051 y
50 L.F., 12"0
® S = 0.50%
STA 14+31.48, 70.50• RT.
LE - 45656 1$4-
1-L
SCALE I =za• rruarz.
1'=5• rCN r,
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2'
DATUM: N.aV.D: 29
VERTICAL DATUM:
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM
OF 1929 (NGVD29)
BENCH MARK: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
B.M. NO. FW144, LOCATED 0.20 MILE
EAST INTERSECTION OF 1-5 OVERPASS
AND SOUTH 320TH STREET, MONUMENT
IN CASE IN FRONT OF DRIVEWAY TO
HOUSE #3112 ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
-5. •� SOUTH 320TH STREET,
TOP OF MONUMENT ELEV. = 462.933.
r U)
m
5i
1
H
�1 1 PERMIT N0. BSP98-0003
• • , , . • • "5; • AS INLET WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
SHALL HAVE VANED GRATES.
SEE SHEET C-lj FOR PRIVATE 32nd AVE. S. WARNING WARNING A
B <0• 9CE55 CASEMENT CROSS SECTION 2. CATCH BASIN OFFSET CALLOUTS ARE TO L OF C.EL CONSTRUCTION IS WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS
A HIGH PRESSURE GAS LINE. CONTRACTOR SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. s:
3. STORM STUBS ARE FOR LOTS, SOME LOTS SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEPTH IS UNKNOWN.
MAY HAVE TWO STUBS IF THEY CONTAIN TWO ACTIVITIES WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY_ CALL 1-800-424-5555. p
SEPARATE BASINS
,l;r, v�;ty o,;p �''n _; * 4+� �•�pp �;; $ �: al ue}. '�'�I.;M y T?q WjY r'`r�� '�rc�pi
K;G g� �r�� v� ..* r,lp ,•,p q,.v 'r •�^
h �
Y
CUMFICATIZ4:
- f-•- - -- — P.V.I. A. 1 + r j 1 NERESY DECLARE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE CLEV, 46P.30
ELEV. 471.39 _ EXISTING GROUND 0 CL ROAD ; I THAT THE INFORMATION I SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE �•y"�'T�4 I S.S.D. req - 200'
S.SO.; req . 21" ,-AS-CONSiRUCTEO COF(pitiDNS.' T}RS CERTIFICATION 4:.; S ("� S.S.D. pro a 294.3
S.S.D.; pro 235' Y EXISTING GROUND ®EX 12AS IS 80.SED UPON WORK .PREP-E0 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 'j7�%
475 - -' -- -� •' °-- ; -_ __. .. ._..... - - _ - H - - - ....._ . A61D�R su a plZACTc DNAL EN- _
E T • H.P.HP
CINEERINC,. -
_•, r
I`I PROPOSED GRADE ®CL ROApi IAG,jZ'
} � � I EX 12' H.P. GAS LINE - SGOTT 1MA014TOSN, L.S. H0. 15661 _
TO BE RELOCATED BY 07HER$ DATE: i - vl>wJ
OF FEDERAL WAY
Z
-
— m W. M.
tL
-
4
�•�~�
4G0. _
M....N _
.- --
.... _.. :-•- .._ ..
_.. _ . . _ _..
�-._
r2 Rp
T_ W
� rn
¢
G
455
a
.,:
053%
�O�L.F,. 1�4 S 9 B S 93B4fr
Ni2
=IL.F.
R12 0.49
+�6'L F.. 18m �x& O S9
-= Sr9A
199.E N12 0.52X
43.8
.
`43 1rO �&.N12
18.76%
�4-L.
®S = H-2-367 -
LF.,
®S = O.SOR I
o
'
I
C.B 7, TYRE 1
B. 9 TYP 1
5
L� E- l5:4r ?1R'la
LIE12ro
459.92 12"9
463.04 -
445
-17855.5.—
f
17-9 -rB:
•~
�-- - .-
-� --"- ---,..-_.�_ -----.
__._ �
�" -
a
O 5 - GA' 14F ----
C.B. 15. TYPE 2--4 0
^�_.....-.__.---'•
_ _
__ 8"m 5.9.
__
50 L•F., 12"0 5$
LE
a 440
S - 0 50
1Fro.
_ •®
455.90, 12"s N
6
.8. 8 TYP w4C'!
E
455.58. TB'O S
456.01, tx6 W
,B.
I.E.. 45�s.}3- 12 d7• 454,93. 1Se N
464.9T 453.114. 18'9 N
._..�_
I.E. P l54.;5 HrO 53:92. 1TO S
..
I.E. mr "-�T18"9 4W20. Ifo E
45k52, 1TO W
435
454.9 }g° S
14+00
14+40
14+80 15+20
15+60 16+00
16+40
16+80 17+20
17+60 18+00 18+40 18+60
47Q -
465
460
455
450
.445.
440
Mg7CHL� A PORTION OF W. 1/2 OF THE N.W. 1/4 OF SECTION 15 AND OF 'T N.E. 1/4 OF SECTION 16, TWP. 21 N., t 4 E., W.M.
NE ST _ _ SCALE ' '20 HORIZ.
=5' VERT.
' S�� SHr �s+y0,}1_ CONTOUR MERVAL = 2'
I 4 C.B. �11. TYPE 1 I HEREBY DECLARE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE n DATLIM: N_G.VD= 29
19•r4-t38-',5�sT`-t THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE "�'..... VERTICAL DATUM:
C.B. •flo' TTHL ry? "AS -CONSTRUCTED CONDITIONS" THIS CERTIFICATION :4
9T0. ".ai•av;-eerr?-rr q ' ! I �i 19+47.26, 36.47' LT �:,; y NATIONAL GEODEDC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NGVD29)
.19+45:87, 19.62' RT. II •� I. IS BASED UPON WORK PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ,}
BENCH MARK: CRY OF FEDERAL WAY BM. NO. FW144,
p qq GENERALLY ACCEPTED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING ' - LOCATED 0.20 MILE EAST INTERSECTION OF 1-5
I i AND/p NC PRACTICE OVERPASS AND SOUTH 320TH STREET. MONUMENT
1ti I T j1 a 1 ,lP11 IN CASE IN FRONT OF DRNEWAY TO HOUSE 13112
•. �... ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SOUTH 320TH STREET.
IL LLACIkTGSN, L. HO. } 61 ;T.4L 'ilk TOP OF MONUMENT ELEV. = 462.933.
1 q56• L t h}?f . n_ :'ll-.. •� r _ :...
32nd AVE. DATE:- S. � - a jai. 0 ,' ; �
2.6 i � � - PERMIT NO. BSP98-0003
CITY
OJI LT EDERAL WAY
STA. 19+61.67. 5&77! RT. - �1 'I ` I ,
I.E. = 454.27, 12'4 WARNING
1 3 N12 CONSTRUCTION IS WITHIN THE VICINITY OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
NOTE: ®S.F.,'12"mee r +� ! �; `, a +26,a5. Ds 752. LT. A HIGH PRESSURE GAS LINE. CONTRACTOR
I. ALL NEW AND EXISTING CATCH BASINS USED H
SHALL HAVE VANED GRATES.I� �I•;,,z� - H. TO G/S LNE SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION DATE
AS INLET WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY r 1 BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS ACTIVITIES WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY_
I r _ �~1
2. CATCH BASIN OFFSET CALLOUTS ARE TO f I-
rL of C.B. j j ld, P� l (2. ,' i WARNING
3. STORM STUBS ARE FOR LOTS, SOME LOTS '� f I ..'F- SECTION A -A THE EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS
MAY HAVE TWO STUBS IF THEY CONTAIN TWO , i p i
SEPARATE BASINS. SEE SHEET C-13 SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY.
•• P.C. STA. 20+47-33 �` -• i .•� �, °�`� � ,� \ DEPTH IS UNKNOWN.
I ' L CALL 1-800-424-5555.
I
�J n oI
1� \ Y
T 1 \ AS U11t d i9.s�._.j.Ti
I r N.P. G�5 O+if d clz c
f f • •j,gR • �. 1 TO BE RELOCATED BY OTHERS .� ' "-
1 (€)
- „, \ 4'_ T STA g14. TYPE 1
l l r _
t{ Ip{ }( �T_ PU7 ` I 1 r .i'' N7 • " • • •I - '.•ti ,` , >\ TO.9E RELO AT BY OTHERS 23+49.75. 21.02'wLT.
SCR I�d(1� .........
SIO �G } 1 R � , �l r \ -- - SiMWALK EASEMVNT� 5.
30' ONtRETE DRIVEWAY
SEE DETAIL SHEET C-13
CURB NO.
STATION
FL ELEV.
CURVE DATA
19+08.78, 22' LT_
462.18
A/4
460.81
A = 81'47'12'•
01
A /2
459.44
R = 58.00'
A 3/4
458.06
L = 82.79'
19+66,19, 71.71' LT.
456.69
19+66.19. 71.71' LT,
456.69
y/4
455.16
A = 6433'17'
453.63
R = 82.00'
e 3/4
452.10
L = 92-39'
22+32.20, 71.71' LT,
450.57
22+32.20, 71.71' LT,
450.57
4/4
449.20
A = 81'47'12"
03
e/2
447,83
R = 58.00'
e 3/4
446.45
L = 82.79'
22+89.60, 22' LT.
445.08
20+4T35, 22' RT.
457.05
414
455.77
A = 99,01'08"
®
e/2
454,49
R = 82.00'
e 3/a
453.20
L = 141.71'
21+51.04, 22' RL
451.92
C
}
�_ 8$:. 7'• 9H•15'5i"W7y_ _ - m - - n W
r a () W
Z co
-
' 1 f$7,4 H12 •~ S.D:nC 281.8 �k12 l .86x: T W 409 L F lice L F, i✓io 8r2 0 5 r9C.>'. = W
p (n
CifRlr RAT tW L.F..
-- - 6
L - 10 3.6 9' 74' P.T. S TI L 2 f + 5 3.0 M1 - - � � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - - - •
I,E. a 4•FF.•+1•. 12"e � C.B. #13, TYPE 2-48•'0 � 3
443.98 a STA. �3+58�&2N-R>=
_ _
23+49-32, 18.85' RT. f rn
K 21 +57.1 . 19wW RT, f STA. 23+50. 52:50' RT.
w 323.rd. S7. L LE = 434:34, 1Z'm n
w ^ p,•N ,.,:� 'M! ,� - m a, ` M Qnj'p C: P v' 'hQ w ^ ",:.G
ev.� :. m �` n ,:.ra.n ;n y In,^ „i..Y. �;'Iv _ __ ,.•� c`� d.'r, a a * v '.r
455
_240'1 V.C. 470. 40 465
479.. P,V.I. ST. 19+50 0 -
$ P.V.I. ELE.V. 462-30 'd EXISTING GFOVND 0 & ROAD- -
„ I 4
a U PROROSEO GRADE\ Q ROAD - R
CYLSRNG GROUND ® EX. IV' H.P. GAS M?QINE a : . ___
. ._485. a. 465 `46p - - - 4
_5
y ` ~ - EX. 1Z E RP. OAS UN
460 455. .. ?n B£ NEtACA1ED @j, E fli4T51... ~ I� 455 - -
_ _ ....._ _ ■h 445 [0
Ex
_ _ _ 4545
¢ 4.4.
+
399=L F.. lire -s4_ �•V.. �` ` . ,Y _ _ _ �. �2'! "�. ~��rA•Wllf. +
0,52X ��:_ 450- 445 - "�.._.. •335
>j 450 Q _ %2 N12. Y t _ - _ -
N-56-L.F.. lZty 8--i9•- -40 L,F., 112"Olm 7 .F, _. ___ _ �i" - N1 .^ _ Q
6 S = 142% A 0 S = 113
69 F�•II.S- T$"e 1 _ _ 33 L.E.. 12"4 i�.$.-
2.61x 1*�2 ®g =� - ..� ..,ems s.'- O.so%-
W .. i t TYP l j �+����_ 430
D5 _ 430 _
`^
S.� 440
LLI
C.B. I2-48' 1 ..1 _� - 1�"BLF• C.B. ii IYPE l l ~34.9 ��_.w _26 8 1H'e z•.
a V - 453.33, 12"m W I! __ _ 1�d 7J Q S a I.E. =.�3:-18z 12"e *1 t,F.. 12"0 56.N12 --_ _.�L ,N1,2 ®S �,�� J
I.E. = 4S]�+3: }Z'o i52:84, 12"o E - -• � '� 437.17 _ 3.g 425
LE 4ra}2.t. 18'm 493.4.1, 18'm S - _ �.'_ - 435 425 _8.85R_ _ ..- - -
440 Q 440 435 102 L.F.. 17s. 5 8 - - _ - y_ -�• .» 4
r -
~2 --- �. ��.., �.-_`_�_ -_ _�- _• �8'o S.S '.R..�___� - -- -- �1S TYP 4 - ..... _ �.... - C.S. �73 T 441 m 433.5B, 12'm N Q
-•• __ 4 1. 1 443,46. 12'v W '�`� - I.E �8,2o S
i33:67: tam 433.31"
�12•a 4L3.07, 1�0 H 433.31"d
z 435 = 43 I.E.=�49,16o 4430. Uri$ E 430 2
3 19+20 19+60 20+00 20+40 20+80 21+20 21+60 ' 22+00 22+40 22+80 23+20 23+60 24+00 24+40 24+80
R/W 60' R.O.W.
SW E5112.5 1 1.5' PROFILE REFERENCE POINT I.yL SW ESMT
CONSTRUCTION
5• A 22• 1i 22'
51D£NAL% MIN- MIN' SIDEWALK
S• 11' }�• r _ 11' __ 5'
DgcE PA TRAVEL TANE CE FR rR LE TIBAVEL WlE BIKE PALM
AN
Lr THICK CONCRETE
CONCRETE CURB -_ AND GUTTER
COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE- CLASS A•
CRUSHED ROCK BASE COURSE•
• ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN
4" ASPHALT CONCRETE CLASS A
4" ASPHALT CONCRETE CLASS E
PER GEOTECH CONSULTANTS
REPORT DATED MARCH 10. 1999
PULLC 13l7AD CROSS SECT.]C71V
No, TD s ()
LOCAL ACCESS
ian-RNEWAY
I AS'KALT PAVEMENT
ASP11.74T PAVEMEN:
END TRANSITIONAL CURB
5' SIDEWALK • . "•�
IyIML15 � DtICKF1JE0
`�aT1EwALK
•1i li
COMBINATION CURB & I SiNP
GUTTER THRU JOINT •• I (4•S URT•)
.5"
A ROADWAY u `GUTTER LINE
PLAN
MATCH SIDEWALK
GRADE
3— 4 BAR5 TO BE I �� 5" THICK CONCRETE
A D AT QRfl+E{Y� AT DRIVEWAY APPROACH
APPROACH f1VP]
QONCF3ETE DRIVEWAY A.PPRDAGti
NOT TU=SGLE
LANDSCAPING (TYP-)
2.0%
NATIVE MATERIAL RECOMPACTED TO
951, TO BE USED FOR SUB -BASE
NOTES:
1. CONTRACTION JOINTS (3/8"x1-1/2") SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT 15' INTERVALS,
2. "V' GROOVES SHALL BE SPACED TO CORRESPOND TO THE MARKINGS IN EXISTING
SIDEWALKS.
4 3. ALL SIDEWALK EDGES SHALL HAVE A 1/4" RADIUS-
4. ALL UTILITY POLL:$, METER DORM AND OTHER OOSTRUCTIONS SHALL HAVE 3/9
EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL PLACED AROUND THEM.
CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK
s-
e
6" GABION MATTRESS
y 33'
GGGS 3_VINL — S LIIL `•�E FOR ELEV.
iI—
y A�WC-9_F4S�T.F�"
IOIENOOTEXIILE LINER
OVERFLOW_ SPILLWAY DETAIL
NOT iQ SCALE - - — - -
3
m
n
6" EXTRUDED CURB (TYP.)
VAVLMLNI tLtV 11—
FINAL LIFT TO BE APPLIED AT TAR DATE.
TRAFFIC ISLAND - STA. _1-9+50
NOT TO SCALE
In
m
I
ASPHALT CONC, PAVEMENT CL."B' J ,
2" COMPACTED DEPTH MINIMUM J
CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE
2-1/2" COMPACTED DEPTH MIN -
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE
NATIVE MATERIAL RECOMPACTED TO
1-1/2" COMPACTED DEPTH MIN.
95% TO BE USED FOR SUB -BASE
YPICAL AaCTION - PRIV CC
SS EASEMENT
NOT TO SCALE
NOTE:
THIS PRIVATE ACCESS IS ONLY TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS NECESSARY TO SERVE
EITHER OF LOTS A. B. D. OR E, FINAL DESIGN DETAILS WILL BE INCLUDED
AS PART OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL FOR THE FIRST LOT REQUIRING
ITS CONSTRUCTION.
ARI
SEE PLANS
7QUARRY
1'(MIN.)
4" MINUS 2" SPACES FILTER FABRIC
LENGTH = 12' (UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE)
AP P DETAIL
NOTES:
1. G5®IOIi MATTRESS SWILL BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS
AND WSDOT SPECLFICATGNS 9-27.3 (3)
2. ROCK GRADATION SHALL BE REASONABLY WELL GRADED WITH ROCK GRADATION
AS FOLLOWS:
MAXIMUM STONE SIZE B'
MINIMUM STONE SIZE 2'
TRAF-'F1C CCIRGLE ROADWAY SECTION
-- I<OT 10 -SCAL! -
TRUCK APRON EDGE
WN TOWE
As —BUILT CERTIFlGTIOl1:
1 HEREBY DECLARE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
THAT THE 1NWORMATION SHOWN HEREON REFLECTS THE
R•� .-
"AS —CONSTRUCTED CONDITIONS." THIS CERTIFICATION
IS BASED UPON WORK PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GENERALLY ACCMED PRQFE550NAL ENGINEERING
AND/OR SURVEYING PRACTICE. ,
R. SCOTT VACWDSH. LS. NO. 15661
DATE
PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS NOT AVAJLABLE,
FINAL LIFT TO BE APPUED AT A LATER DATE.
TR_ AFF_ IQ ISLAND - STA. 22+50
MDT TO 5UhLE —
T[
TRAFFIC ISLAND
f
T.AMDSCAPW. TRAFFIC ISLAND CURB
SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET
TRAFFIC ISLAND SECTION
NOT TO SCALE
1
Amy' R=1/Y
PAVEMENT ••
73 4'
• NOTE TOP OF CURB
® DRIVEWAYS
CEMENT CONCRETE +CURB
15• _
�- 5.�� rfT�•J�
-- ff� �'• Ir - 1�.�.wvllvura>=,� - �:.III�
Ir B" MIN COMPT, DEPTH.
4"-2" QUARRY ROCK SURFACING
Mft N E ACCESS ROAD- DETAIL.
— NaY— —
2.5'
SIDEWALK
EASEMENT
PAveuENr k f
• NOTE: TOP OF CURB
® DRIVEWAYS
TRAFFIC ISLAND CURB DETAIL
MQIJNTABLE CONCRETE CURB
NaT 1a SYJ]F
PERMIT NO. BSP98-0003 I
OF FEDERAL WAY