Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
12-101554
CITY OF �- Federal November 14, 2014 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Way Federal Way, WA 98003-ra325 (253) 835-7000 "Vvx • crh`offedera &vay. cam Woody Ahn Korean Mission Church 405 South 312" Street Federal Way, WA 99003-4032 RE: File #12-101554-00-UP; CANCELLED APPLICATION F'W Mission Church Parking Lot, 405 South 312th Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Ahn: This letter is to inform you that the Process III Master Land Use application for the proposed parkin lot is cancelled due to inactivity. The city has not received a resubmittaI of requested items listed in the g October 17, 20]3, technical comment letter and two 180-day extensions were granted to respond. Therefore, pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code 19.15.050{1), the application is cancelled. IfYou would like to continue the development proposal, you will need to submit a new Process III Master Land Use application with the accompanied plans and technical reports. Please remove the yellow Notice of Application sign an the property frontage. Please contact me at 253.835.2638 or matit, herrera ci offederalwa .coat regarding this letter. if you have any questions Matthew Herrera, AICP Senior Planner c: Brian Kim, BK Design, 36006 I Ph Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 John Anderson, PE, Pace Engineers, 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300, Kirkland, WA 98033 Ann Dower, senior Engineering Plans Examiner Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Doc, LD. 67287 Matt Herrera rrom: Matt Herrera Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 9:23 AM bkdesig n66@gmail. com, Subject: RE: Request Hold the "FW Mission Church Parking Lot Project Good Morning Brian, I've discussed this issue with other staff and we will allow one additional 180-day extension for submittin requested materials. The 180-day extension will begin on May 14, 2014. Requested materials must be submitted by November 2014. 10, Matt Herrera, AICP Senior Planner City of Federal Way 253.835.2638 From: brian kim mailto: bkdesi n65 mail corn Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1.55 PM To: Matt Herrera Subject: Fwd: Request Hold the "FW Mission Church Parking Lot Project Dear Matt Thanks for helping us. Would You update the status to extend the "Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot Project"? J Thanks again. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matt Herrera <Matt.Herrera cit offederalwa .comma Date: Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:49 AM Subject: RE: Request Hold the "FW Mission Church Parking Lot Project To: "bkdesi nb& mail.com" <bkdesi n66 ail_com� Thanks Brian. I'll discuss this with my supervisor and get you a reply Matt Herrera, AlCP Associate Planner City of Federal Way 253,835.2638 From: brian kim [mailto:bkdesign66� _ mail.c�m1 Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:50 AM To: Matt Herrera Hold the "FW Mission Church Parking Lot Project Subject: Fwd: Request Date: March 13, 2014 Subject: RE: FILE #12-101554-00-UP Dear Matt, I received a letter that indicated the project shall be hold until May 14, 2014. f the project. Be cause of situation of Federal Way Mission Church, I believe it would not meet the dead line op J I would like to request to extend an additional holding of the Parking Lot Project. roblem has not been solved yet at this point - Church Building As we discusse d before, the church internal p Committee is not reform yet, so 1 request to additional Hold Pra ect I will let you know as soon as the project is reactivate. Please let me know if you need my signature or anything else. please confirm when you receive this mail. Thank you for your help. Sincerely Brian Kim FW Mission Church Parking Lot Project ManagerBK Design 1250 SW 355th PI Federal Way, WA 98023 253-332-3625 Thank you Sincerely Brian Kim BK Design 253-332-3625 CITY OF Federal Way February 11, 2014 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www citynffedera4vaycom Brian Kim BK Design 1250 SW 355" Place Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: File #12-101554-00-UP; USE PROCESS IV APPLICATION ON HOLD FW Mission Church Parldng Lot, 405 South 312th Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kim: This letter formally acknowledges and grants approval of a 180-day hold of the Use Process IV Master Land Use application, You have requested additional time to submit corrected lighting plans, transportation study, and geotechnical report. Due to the dismissal of the church's building committee, You have requested additional time to obtain authority to proceed with, additional consultant work. The time extension is authorized by Federal lay Revised Code 19.70.150(2)(b)(iv). Please be advised that this 180-day hold began on the day of your ernaiI request to me, November 19, 2013. Co are needed by May 1$, 2014, in order to keep the land use application current. rrected items Please contact me at 253-835-2638 or matt.hezTera ci offederalwa .com regarding this letter or your development proposal. if you have questions Sincerely, a ew Herrera, AICP Associate Planner C- Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Rev icwer SaradY Long, Senior Transporhation Planning Engineer Doc. I.D. 64999 CITY OF Federal October 17, 2013 Brian Kim BK Design 36006 11 w Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 CITY HALL FILE Way 33825 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA980W-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederahvayc corn RE: FILE #12-101554-00-UP; TECHNICAL RESPONSE LETTER #4 FW Mission Church Parldng Lot, 405 South 312"' Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kim: City staff has reviewed your August 14 resubmittal. The department is unable to issue the environmental determination or schedule a public hearing until the following items are corrected. I _ Transportation — The .Tune 8, 2012, technical comment addendum requested that your traffic consultant contact Sarady Long at 253-935-2743 to discuss a method to analyze specific neighborhood concerns regarding excessive queue lengths and congestion caused by the mid - block crossing. The resubmitted traffic impact analysis did not provide commentary on this request nor did your traffic consultant speak with Sarady Long. This must be completed prior to issuing SEPA and scheduling a hearing. 2. Stall Count — Please verify the correct number of parking stalls on each drawing. I have counted 186 stalls. The site plan legend indicates 182 & 190, and the landscape plan legend indicates 185 stalls. 3. Lighting — The lighting plan shows lampposts within the 30-foot required yards of the subject property. The posts will need to be reIacated to the interior of the parcel. Please keep in mind that the minimum average maintained footcandles of I must be ve plan. rified on the resubmitted lighting 4. Starmwater & Engineering — Ann Dower from the Development Services Division is currently reviewing the geotechnical report that was completed for the previous single-family preliminary plat application for relevance as it pertains to the proposed surface parking lot for the Federal Way Mission Church. Those comments and any Other comments relatin portion of the application review will be sent under separate cover. g to the engineering APPLICATION STATUS As of today, the 120-day review period remains stopped due to the incomplete resubmittal of transportation items. The review period will begin again within 14 days of a complete resubmittal of items_ When resubmitting requested information, please provide referenced items, four copies of corrected a written response to each of the abave- reports, six copies of corrected full size plans, and two copies of 1 IX17 plans with the enclosed resubmittal form pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to Mr. Kim October 17, 2013 Page 2 provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The Federal Way Revised Code can be reviewed in its entirety at htt :11www.cod ublishin .comfWA/FederalWa 1 questions re arding this letter or your development project, please contact in at 253-835- If you have any q g 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Matthew herrera Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form c_ Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Doc. LD. 64340 12-101554 CITY or -��-. Federal Way February 15, 2013 CITY HALL ILL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www cityoffederalway. com Brian Kim BK Design 36006 11 m Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: FILE #12-101554-00-UP; TECHNICAL RESPONSE LETTER #3 FW Mission Church Parking Lot, 405 South 312" Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kim: City staff has completed review of your December 12, 2012, Process IV Master Land Use (MLU) application resubmittal. Site improvements include a new 190-stall parking area located on a vacant Parcel (APN 082104-9057) that is across the street from the existing church location of405 South 312`h Street. Associated improvements include a stormwater facility, landscaping, and frontage improvements. The application was deemed complete May 2, 20I2. TECHNICAL COMMENTS Unless otherwise noted, the following comments provided by staff reviewing your project must be addressed prior to scheduling a public hearing for the proposal. Please direct questions regarding any of the technical comments to the appropriate staff representative. Zoning and Land Use Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com 1. Lot Coverage — Please clarify lot coverage calculation includes existing church improvements across the street by providing two separate calculations: one for the proposed improvements on the north side of South 312`h Street, and one for the existing improvements on the south side is South 31 rt Street. 2. Boundary Discrepancy — Resubmitted sheets do not accurately depict the boundary line on the northeast portion of the site plan, which has resulted in fencing and landscaping being shown off site. Please correct the site, landscape, and civil sheets to reflect the County Court Case #02-2-19282-3KNT. quiet title action resulting from King 3. Pedestrian Connections — Hatch painted crossings within the parking lot aisle crossings are not an acceptable method of delineation. Please correct and choose a method comparable to colored concrete connections shown between the parking spaces and landscape islands. 4- Wellhead Checklist — The previous correspondence incorrectly included a handout regarding wellheads instead of an actual checklist. Please complete the enclosed checklist and return with your resubmittal package. 5. Professional Seals — The site and civil sheets must be stamped by a registered architect or professional engineer. Mt. 'Kim February 15, 2013 Page 2 6. Fencing — The proposed fencing surrounding the subject property, including fencing at the base of the rockery wall on the north perimeter, shall remain to mitigate pedestrian cut -through concerns- 7- Value of Improvements — The Master Land Use application states the value of the proposed improvements at $25,000. Please clarify the value and include the drainage facility, landscaping, asphalt, concrete, frontage improvements, etc. 8. Neighborhood Concerns — Surrounding neighbors continue to have concerns regarding the impacts of the proposal. I have included a neighbor response letter for your review. Stormwater and Engineering Ann Dower, 253-835-2732, an a.dower@cityoffederalway.com Comments from the May 2, 2012, technical comment letter were not addressed. The following still apply: Revise the TIR to include soils logs, soils infiltration tests, and the written opinion of a geotechnical engineer that soils are suitable for a functioning infiltration facility. A minimum of 3 feet of permeable soil below the bottom of the facility and a minimum of 3 feet between the bottom of the facility and maximum wet -season water table is required. Transportation Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com Traffic comments will be sent shortly under separate cover. APPLICATION STATUS As of today, the 120-day review period has stopped with 51 days used. The review period will begin again within 14 days of a complete resubmittal of items requested/corrected. When resubmitting requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, six copies of corrected full size plans, and two copies of i Ixl7 plans with the enclosed resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days (August 14, 2013) of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The Federal Wary Revised Cade can be reviewed in its entirety at htt :Ilwww.code ublishin .cnm/WA! dgr k 1 If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffedemlway.com. Sincer 2r errera Associate Planner enc_ c. Bulletin 056 `Hazardous Materials Statement' Neighbor Letter Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Bulletin 129 `Resubmittal Information' Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Doc ID 62951 12-101554 FiLE CITY OF Federal Way June 8, 2012 CITY MALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. C410fledw aWay, com Brian Kim BK Design 3 6006 11 m Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Rl�: FILE #12-101554-00-UP; TECM,4rCAL CON NrIErvT ADDENDUM FW Mission Church Parking Lot, 405 South 312`h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kim: The Community and Economic Development Department is currently reviewing the applicant's Process N Master Land Use application for parking improvements to the existing FederaI Way Mission Church. The purpose of this letter is to add seversl items that have been presented to staff by the surrounding community and to addend the May 2, 2012, Letter of Complete Application and Technical Review. COMMUNITY INQUIRY The city received the following questionslconce Parking area. The department has addressed eacrns signed by 13 neighbors that reside near the proposed h item as it relates to the city code, but the neighbors also request the applicant to respond to each item. Please submit responses to each item below as request in the aa component of the resubmitta! package bove-referenced May 2 letter. I. Sunday morning traffic congestion along 312`h Street. It is already difficult to get out onto 312'h Street from 5`h Way without the addition on 190 cars on the north side of the street. 2. Pedestrian safety. How will 190+ people safely cross 312'j' Street during high volume traffic time without causing accidents and traffic congestion? 3. Security. A large parking lot in a wooded area could become a hangout for gangs, under -age drinking, drug use, etc. 4. Privacy for the homes that border the proposed parking lot (foot traffic cutting through the parking lot and our yards as a short cut). 5. Buffer for noise and lights. 6. Landscaping to screen out the parking lot from the vision of the neighborhood. 7. Possible decline of property value and resale for home owners in the area. Mr. Kim June 8, 2012 Page 2 TECHNICAL COMMENT ADDENDUM These comments augment the staff technical comments provided in the May 2 letter. Please provide responses to each item with the resubmittal package. I. Transportation — Several neighbors of the subject property have concerns regarding traffic congestion caused by the mid -block pedestrian crossing. Specific concerns relate to how the mid - block crossing will affect vehicles at the intersection of South 312' Street and 5th Way South. Please have your transportation consultant contact Sarady Long at 253-83 5-2743 or Barad .lon ci offederalwa .coat to discuss additional analysis that the city will require prior to issuing an environmental determination. 2. Future Improvements — The ta is site planfutin icauseses a actorbuildngsdential building and multi -purpose structure. Please provide de 3. Fencing — Please provide fencing details for the property's perimeter. 4. Notice Affidavit — Please submit the signed affidavit for the yellow notice board installation. APPLICATION STATUS As of today, the 120-day review period has stopped with 0 days used. The review period will begin again within 14 days of a complete resubmittal of items ague lease °rected in provide a the espouse to y 2 letter d each of the addendum. When resubmitting requested information, p above -referenced items, four copies of corrected reports, six copies of corrected full size plans, and two copies of I1x17 plans with the enclosed resubmittal. form . Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information isrequested, the application shall be deemed void. The Federal Way Revised Code can be reviewed in its entirety at h :Ilwww.code ublishin com./WA/Fedqra1W4L/ If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely Matthew Herrera Associate Planner ene: Resubmittal Form Sarady Long, SeniorTran�portation Planning Engineer Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Doc. LD, 61359 12-101554 CITY OF rrs� Federal Wa CfTYHALL Y 33325 8th Avenue 5ovffi Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253} 835-7C30d W INKY. Ci4vffederahvay. com May 2, 2012 Brian Kim BK Design 36006 I Ph Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: FILE #12-101554-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION AND TECHNICAL REVIEW FW Mission Church Parking Lot, 405 South 312" Street Dear Mr. Kim: The Community and Economic Development Department is in receipt ofyour Process IV Master Land Use (ULU) application submitted to the city April 6, 2012. The Federal Way Mission Church has Proposed a 190-stall parking area located on a vacant parcel (APN 082104-9057) that is across the street from the existing church location of405 South 312" Street. The remainder of this letter outlines Procedural steps and technical review of the initial submittal package. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION The Process IV MLU application is deemed complete as of May 2, 20I2. This determination of completeness is based an a review of your submittal relative to applicable requirements referenced within Federal Wary Revised Code (FWRC) 19-15.040, "Development application submittal requirements." A technical review of the MLU application has begun. FWRC 19.70.150 provides the Hearing Examiner 120 days to review and issue a decision on the application. Please be advised that the 120-day review/decision time will stop whenever the city or agencies with jurisdiction request corrections, additional studies, or information. The 120-day review time will begin within 14 days from the date the information has been provided to the city. PUBLIC NOTICE The combined Notice of Application and optional DNS will be distributed within 14 days of this letter as follows: (1) one copy will be posted at each of the official notification boards; (2) one copy will be Published in the Federal Wary Mirror,- and (3) a copy will be mailed to Property Owners within 30et the subject property. The department also has the responsibility to notify othergencies that may have of jurisdiction over your development project or an interest in it. The applicant is responsible for posting a notification board prepared by the city. The notification board will be ready for pick up at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center will call area by 8:00am Friday, May 11, 2412, The board must be io the affidavit attached to the sign following installation. by Thursday, May 17, 20I2. Please return A notice of public hearing will be issued at least 14 days prior to the hearing date. A staffreport with recommendation will be made available within seven days of the public hearing. Mr, Kim . • .- May 2, 2012 Page 2 TECHNICAL COMMENTS your Unless otherwise noted, the fallowing heart a for provided proposal. staff easeldirectgquestions regarding any of project must be addressed prior to scheduling a public g the technical comments to the appropriate staff representative. Zoning and Land Use Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com 1. Lot Coverage — FWRC 19.200.050 limits the amount of lot coverage any �o church hurc us satious 7 e percent the ent of the subject property. The area of all structures, pavement, subject property will be calculated as a percentage of total lot area in determining compliance with maximum lot coverage. Please provide lot overage totals on the site plmince for teeth the propose perceparkntg area and existing church improvements across the street verifying p threshold. iscrepancy with ary 2. Boundary Discrepancy — King County Recorder'sAOtatu records antyDeded recorded November 8 locations on the northeast portion of the property. County Court Case 402- 2010, contains a legal description with quiet title action 1a tai s tmh al# eed p perry line. Please 2-19282-3KNT. A record of survey recorded May 13, 2005, correct all sheets to show updated boundaries of the church property. 3. Pedestrian Connectionlh Five -foot -wide pedestrian walkways kwaysacrossepop street. FWRCd within e parking lot connecting to South 312 Street and existing c property 19.115.090(1)(i) requires six -foot -wide pedestrian walkways. Please correct all sheets to show six- foot -wide pedestrian walkway. aved routes ng a FWRC 19.15.050(4)(b) advises pedestrian walkways tltods of delineation an ied by nclude: stone, brick, or�granite variation in paved texture and color. Approved pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Paint striping on asphalt as a of and of delineation is not encouraged. Please provide delineation method on site plan for parking lot and existing church property. 4. Wheel Stops — For unobstructed pedestrian travel along delineated walkways, please provide wheel stops on those parking stalls adjacent to pedestrian walkway. 5. Accessible Parking Stalls —The increasers f sttllSpWhen total parking forstalls for the a use iswill between 201 and increase in the number of accessible parking 300 spaces, the Americans with Disabilities At; �D of trave3 to uires an accessible building entrance.ven of those stalls be le They must be located on the shortest accessible Please provide locations for the seven accessible stalls on the existing church parking area satisfying ADA requirements. 6. Lighting — It cannot be confirmed the parking lot contains the recommended Illuminating en all The Engineering Society (IES) minimum outdolight levels as requ of 1 fcparking ng areas Pleaby the city's sesubmit a IES recommends minimum average maintained photometric lighting plan that incorporatesdetail drawings oditional lighting r photos of pdards to meet the minimum roposed recommended levels (if needed) and lighting standards that are 20 feet in height or less and contain cut-off shields. Doc_ LD. 60975 12-101554 Mr. Kim May 2, 2012 Page 3 7. Clearing and Grading — As shown on the civil shee retaining walls at the rear of the roe fe t in height. grading of the site will result in height of walls in single-family residential zones six feet measured from grade base to120(1) opts the wall. p of In order to maintain proposed elevations, staff suggests terracing in those: areas needing wall heights in excess of six feet. Although this will result in less usable area, you may regain some or all of that area by redesigning the parking stall dimens drive aisles. Design criteria allow standard sions. Stalls are currently sired at 1 Oft. x 18ft. with 29ft. talls of 9Ft x l8f}. stalls with 25ft drive aisles. Additionally, up to 25 percent of the total number of stalls (proposed and existing) may be compact measuring 8ft. x 1:5ft. with 25.5ft. drive aisles. Please see the enclosed parking lot design criteria bulletin for more information. Terracing will require five-foot separation between walls with landscaping on the terrace. Rockeries and retaining walls must be composed of rock, brick, or other textured/patterned wall styles. Please be advised that due to the amount of proposed clearing on the site, the department will use authority granted in FWRC 19.120 060 to require a project timeline that demonstrates h development work and re -vegetation of the site will ow site be completed per approved re -vegetation and landscaping plans within 12 months of commencement of site work. Projects that will not be completed within 12 months of initial clearing, grading, and tree/ vegetation removal activity shall be required to submit plans for interim aesthetic treatment of the site. Phased clearing and grading and/or installation of portions of permanent landscaping as shown on approved plans are some methods the department may require to mitigate the impact of timeline. projects not completed within the 12-month Please provide corrections to the civil sheet that show a minimum of two cross sections of the site depicting the existing and proposed grade and proposed rockeries and/or retaining walls. Please depict height and wall composition. If terracing is utilized, please show appropriate landscaping within terraced sections on the landscaping sheet. 8. Landscaping Plan —Please include retaining walls within the perimeter landscaping screen. Plantings should be appropriately spaced on either side of walls and also provide an adequate screen of the walls for adjacent residences. 9. CPTED — The city's Community Design Guidelines include the }mp]ementa project development review to mtion of Crime Prevention through Community Design (OPTED). These principles and performance standards are used during criminal activity to occur. identify and incorporate design features that reduce opportunities for Applicants are required to submit a completed CPTED checklist as a component of the site plan review application. It appears this CPTED information was inadvertently left out of the preapplication materials and the department apologizes for this oversi complete applicable sections of the enclosed checklist that I have highlighted and . Please reInadvertently four copies with your resubmittal package. 10. Wellhead Protection —The proposed parking lot property is within a five and ten year Wellhead Protection Zone. Please complete the enclosed checklist and submit four copies with your resubmittal package. 12-101554 Doc. I D. 60975 Mr. Kim May 2, 2012 Page 4 Stormwater and Engineering Ann Dower, 253-835-2732, aizn.dower@cityoffederalway.com engineer oils are Provide soils logs, soils infiltration tests, and the n mum en l0j, feet of permeable soil below the bottom of suitable for a functioning infiltration facility. A the facility and a minimum of 3 feet between the bottom of the facility and maximum wet -season water table is required. Transportation Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com Plan Review Comments 1. This property des not have the 660 feet minimum street frontage to allow a second access driveway onto South 312 Street. Please consolidate driveways and tine up with 4's` Avenue South to reduce conflict. Traffic staff would support allowing two driveways with a one-way in and one-way out traffic circulation if the westerly driveway can line up with 4`h Avenue South. 2. The planned roadway for South 312'' Street is a Type C'' °nsiststreet lights all within ] 00 foot ROW- ng of a 66-foot paved street with curb, six-foot planter with street trees, eight foot sidewalk, and an add eight feet would be needed to Assuming a symmetrical cross-section, back eight feet from future right of-way.ommodate this roadway section. Please set all improvements g TMP Review and Pedestrian Comments I. Staff concurs with the recommendationth 3`i2 Streetand a pedestre TMP report to ian pathway ofrom ete sidewalk to crosswalk with flashing lights on So the the church entrance for pedestrian safety. The pedestrian see closed Specs.). shall Theexact loco on of the asher Flashing Beacon System by Spot Devices system t pedestrian flasher shall be reviewed and approved by the City and must be constructed to City standards. SHTO hod- Per 2. Verify intersection sight distance analysis on page & in meeting ail be 3 5 ft w 5 ft d i er's eye height AASHTO intersection sight distance, the object height h and 14.5 ft back from the edge of the traveled way for passenger vehicles. The sight distance triangle shall be depicted on the plan set. Water/Sewer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District, 253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org existing fire As previously noted, because a new proposed driveway ��a �flo re - locate with this hydrant.,l�pp�ictant has Facilities Installation Agreement will be required not yet contacted Lakehaven regarding this FI Agr & the related hydrant re -location- Lakehaven continues to encourage ownersldeveloperslapplicants to apply for Lakehaven processes (as appropriate) separately to Lakehaven, early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. ApFLICATION STATUS used. The As of today, the 120-day review period has stopped temse �'''iiestth 0d/corrected When review resubmitt ng requested gam within 14 days of a complete resubmittal of q information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, two copies of Doc. I.D. 60975 12-101554 Mr. Kim May 2, 2012 Page 5 corrected reports, six copies of corrected fu 11 size plans, and two copies of I I x 17 plants with the enclosed resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The Federal Way Revised Code can be reviewed in its entirety at h :// vvvw.cade ublishin _com/WA/FederalWa / If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera?acityoffederalway.com. ._, S' c ely Matthew Herrera Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form CPTED Checklist Parking Lot Design Criteria Wellhead Protection Checklist RFB Specifications IES Recommended Outdoor Footcandle Levels c: Ann Oower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer SaradY Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 12-101554 Doc. I.D. 60975 31919 1-';' Ave S, Suite 101 1 Federal, Way, WA 98003 1 253.925.5565 1 253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way - Community Development Department as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive weeks(s), commencing on the 1 1 th day of Mav 2012 , and ending on the 1 1 th day of may 2012, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper. was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the SUM of $170.16, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65. 16.090. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 1 st day of .rune 2012. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, ����Illllllf/� CHE�''��,� SSION NOTARY cn� PUBLIC � -- WASN\�,N``• rill Residing at Federal Way 1� Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Federal Way Mission Church Park- ing Lot Project Description: Proposed construction of an ancillary 190-stall at -grade parking facility that will support the Federal Way Mission Church services across the street at 405 South 312th Street. Stormwater control facility, exterior lighting, and landscaping are also associated with the proposal. Subject property is a 2.3-acre vacant parcel located in a Single -Family Residential (RS 7.2) zone. Applicant: Brian Kim, BK Design, 36006 11th Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Project Location: King County Parcel 082104-9057. Parcel is located on the north side Of South 312th Street at the intersection of 4th Av- enue South. Application Received: April 6, 2012 Determined Complete: May 2, 2012 Notice of Application: May 11, 2012 SEPA Comments Due: May 25, 2012 - Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other in- formation on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Deter- mination -of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the pro- r'posed project. The proposal may include mitiga- tion measures under applicable codes, and the re- iiview process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the ;subsequent threshold determination for the specif- ic proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process IV (File #12-101554-UP), Concurrency (File #12-101556- CN), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #12-101555-SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Transpor- tation Management Plan, Traffic Impact Analysis, SEPA Checklist, and Preliminary Technical Infor- mation Report Relevant Environmental Documents Are Avail- able at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Miti- gation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Develop- ment Code" Public Comment & Appeals: The environmental comment period ends May 25, 2012. Any person may submit written comments regarding the Mas- ter Land Use application to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. A notice of public hearing will be issued at least 14 days prior to the hearing date: Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifi- cally request a copy of the written decision may, appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use deci- sion will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable signifi- cant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Avaffability of File: The official project file is available for public review during normal business fi'ours at the Department of Community and. Eco- nomic Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, rederal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Mpfthew Herrera, Associate •Plan- ner,253-835-2638 Published in Federal Way Mirror: May 11, 2012 FWM: 1892 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 8ih Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.dtynffedero1way.co Federal Wayns DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation #- Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Amailed ❑ faxed Ae-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2012, c Project Name File Number(s, Signature Date r.:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of plslnt�'itln.dpCl4osl printed 1 /10/2012 2:23:00 PM NOA/Op tiond DNS and Environmental Checklist to: DEPT OF ECOLOGY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC 31617 1 AVE S PO BOX 47703 PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 Chris.ingham@southkingfire.org sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov basbury@lakehaven.org Gordon.goodsell@southkingfire.org MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 A PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 Tina Piety From: Tina Piety Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:57 AM To: sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov; basbury@lakehaven.org; Chris Ingham; Gordon Goodsell Cc: Matt Herrera Subject: Notice of Application, Optional DNS, & Environmental Checklist Attachments: Mission Church Notice and Checklist.pdf Hello, Attached you will find a Notice of Application/Notice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance and Annotated Environmental Checklist. The project is the Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot. The project is to construct an ancillary 190-stall at -grade parking facility at the north side of South 312th Street at the intersection of 41h Avenue South. Please review and send any comments and or questions to Associate Planner Matt Herrera at 253-835-2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. The comment due date is May 25, 2012. Tina Piety, Administrative Assistant II Department of Community and Economic Development City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609 11 Parcel Map and Data I 0200 0220 912I 9066\ 109�0 01 70 9058 . 0270 0140 0130 0060 _ _ - S ITN ST C 0280 0120 9.268 0290 0890 0910 N 0150 —x` trtJW f1�0 0300 0520 �' � . ' �050� .� a310 5 1 57 '` �03D f 9029 0340 01W {.r {���I rr2i f 7041)'y7+p�1010 i ''r. 9128 0330 0� 90 :.�c K f� "2yA 0 L. F 4 (l230 02[i�l 6011 — 9070 9262 l 9055 239 �'�f 007(1' 0040- e 9242 9227 Y _. 0�00 9276 9057 ti .�' 0�60 925d E u� 9i067 9190 9238 9257 �~'. 9479 9071 D0i0 27 9i32 9 30--- 9053 .� 920e 9236 9179 9�368 1 = - 3r2f 1I 9203 90�0 004o 00-i5 0M 9161 -., 9221 f ' 0035 0030 9106 — —__ 9038 i 0026 a 6 0020 9087 9757 0015 91+�4 (C) 2410 King County 9145 � �rAit 0075 Parcel Number 0821049057 Site Address Zip code Taxpayer FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer 0821049010 EPISCOPAL PARISH CHURCH 0821049053 480 S 312TH ST 98003 MORRISON LARRY 0821049066 325 S 308TH ST 98003 BERGRUD JUAN D & PAULINE M 0821049068 NUMBER ONE INVESTMENT MANAG 0821049157 ST LUKE'S LUTHERAN CHURCH 0821049172 320 S 312TH ST 98003 NORTH WILLIAM W Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer 0821049038 515 S 312TH ST 98003 ST LUKES LUTHERAN CHURCH 0821049055 348 S 312TH ST 98003 HANSON G R 0821049067 31119 5TH AVE S 98003 UMLAND LOWELL 0821049132 350 S 312TH ST 98003 CONTRERAS RAFAEL 0821049161 345 S 312TH ST 98003 EPISCOPAL PARISH CHURCH 0821049209 440 S 312TH ST 98003 ROBERTS RANDY RAY Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer 0821049221 405 S 312TH ST 98003 KOREAN MISSION CHURCH 0821049230 31125 5TH AVE S 98003 COTIE CLAUDIU 0821049242 . 328 S 312TH ST 98003 NUMBER ONE INVESTMENT MANAG 2413300050 31104 5TH WAY S 98003 PINNEY ALESIA & NANCY 2413300070 511 S 310TH PL 98003 FIELD JON K 2413300890 417 S 309TH ST 98003 CRAMBLIT E RAY Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer 0821049227 31025 5TH AVE S 98003 BINA RON S 0821049239 30939 5TH WAY S 98003 BINA RON S 0821049253 31113 5TH AVE S 98003 ALLEN GERALD E+SUSAN K 2413300060 505 S 310TH PL 98003 PHAM THANH 2413300880 30825 4TH PL S 98003 CANNON TED 2413300900 421 S 309TH ST 98003 WOODS DOUGLAS J+LAU RA J Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code 2413300940 30923 5TH PL S 98003 AGOSTINO JAMES J+WANDA D CR 2413300960 30935 5TH PL S 98003 MCGHEE ELIZABETH D 2413300980 504 S 310TH PL 98003 TAYLOR MARGARET M 2413301000 507 S 309TH CT 98003 HANSON PHYLLIS+WALTER 2413301020 510 S 309TH CT 98003 LUTOVSKY ARNOLD J 2413301040 502 S 309TH CT 98003 :_► Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code 2413300950 30929 5TH PL S 98003 MERRITT JOHN P+SANDRA A 2413300970 510 S 310TH PL 98003 SHUKUROV MAKHAMMAD 2413300990 503 S 309TH CT 98003 KWON JOONG GAB 2413301010 511 S 309TH CT 98003 SOPER WESLEY R 2413301030 506 S 309TH CT 98003 TUSTISON GALEN F+LORA L 2413301050 30910 5TH WAY S 98003 Taxpayer ANDY+TRAN Taxpayer GALL DARREN CUONG HUY L+GAIL R Parcel Number 2413301070 Parcel Number 2413301060 Site Address 30906 5TH WAY S Site Address 30902 5TH WAY S Zip code 98003 Zip code 98003 PETERS PETERSEN Taxpayer GREGORY Taxpayer CURT L & A+DEBORAH L BARBARA A Parcel Number 6672650010 Parcel Number 2413301090 Site Address 354 S 309TH ST Site Address Zip code 98003 Zip code WHEATON Taxpayer FEDERAL WAY KEITH CITY OF Taxpayer D+KATHLEEN A Parcel Number 6672650020 Parcel Number 6672650030 Site Address 30834 3RD PL S Site Address 30828 3RD PL Zip code 98003 S BREWER Zip code 98003 Taxpayer RUSSELL S+RITA Taxpayer JOHNSON J JASON O Parcel Number 6672650210 Parcel Number 6672650090 Site Address 335 S 309TH ST Site Address 30833 3RD PL S Zip code 98003 Zip code 98003 KING Taxpayer CHO GI H+KI C Taxpayer DOUGLAS RALPH+JANIS Parcel Number 6672650230 Parcel Number 6672650220 351 S 309TH Site Address 341 S 309TH ST Site Address ST Zip code 98003 Zip code 98003 DOLPH MARVIN & HOGAN Taxpayer AGNES Taxpayer BRANNON PE+SHAUNA R Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer 6672650240 357 S 309TH ST 98003 LONGENECKER TIMOTHY 6672650260 30919 5TH WAY S 98003 KNUTH LANDON Parcel Number Site Address Zip code Taxpayer 6672650250 30907 5TH WAY S 98003 BELL TIMOTHY E+LAURIE A King County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. 41k CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, • 2 n., a. lc hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed fie -mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 9 2012. J Project Name N l�SSs File Number(s) 1 - -I6I -9 .- Signature Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1/12/20122:20:00 PM W-, CITY OF A Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot Project Description: Proposed construction of an ancillary 190-stall at -grade parking facility that will support the Federal Way Mission Church services across the street at 405 South 312`h Street. Stormwater control facility, exterior lighting, and landscaping are also associated with the proposal. Subject property is a 2.3-acre vacant parcel located in a Single -Family Residential (RS 7.2) zone. Applicant: Brian Kim, BK Design, 36006 11t' Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Project Location: King County Parcel 082104-9057. Parcel is located on the north side of South 312t' Street at the intersection of 4'h Avenue South. Application Received: April 6, 2012 Notice of Application: May 11, 2012 Determined Complete: May 2, 2012 SEPA Comments Due: May 25, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process IV (File #12-101554-UP), Concurrency (File #12-101556-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #12-101555-SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Transportation Management Plan, Traffic Impact Analysis, SEPA Checklist, and Preliminary Technical Information Report Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: The environmental comment period ends May 25, 2012. Any person may submit written comments regarding the Master Land Use application to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. A notice of public hearing will be issued at least 14 days prior to the hearing date. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc, LD. 61018 Tamara Fix From: Rudi Alcott <ralcott@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 8:27 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Mission Church Legal Notice No problem. We will get this in for you. Take care, -------------------- Rudi Alcott Publisher Federal Way Mirror p: 253.925.5565 x-1050 c: 253.336.5359 t: 206.390.5925 On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fix@cityoffederalway.com.> wrote: Please publish the following legal notice (FW Mission Church NOA & Opt DNS, 12-101554) in Friday's (May 11, 2012) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. Thanks! Acam ii,L -1Us t. tamara-fjx@)cityoffederqCway.com "When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile." Unknown 1 41k CITY Federalo� Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMLINITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffedercilway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Xe-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2012. Project Name �-- (J 1 1 � SS � sn .L _ File Number(s) Signature Date - K:\CD Administration Res\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /12/2012 2:20:00 PM CITY OF '6100" Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot Project Description: Proposed construction of an ancillary 190-stall at -grade parking facility that will support the Federal Way Mission Church services across the street at 405 South 312`h Street. Stormwater control facility, exterior lighting, and landscaping are also associated with the proposal. Subject property is a 2.3-acre vacant parcel located in a Single -Family Residential (RS 7.2) zone. Applicant: Brian Kim, BK Design, 36006 11"' Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Project Location: King County Parcel 082104-9057. Parcel is located on the north side of South 312`h Street at the intersection of 4"' Avenue South. Application Received: April 6, 2012 Notice of Application: May 11, 2012 Determined Complete: May 2, 2012 SEPA Comments Due: May 25, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process IV (File #12-101554-UP), Concurrency (File #12-101556-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #12-101555-SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Transportation Management Plan, Traffic Impact Analysis, SEPA Checklist, and Preliminary Technical Information Report Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: The environmental comment period ends May 25, 2012. Any person may submit written comments regarding the Master Land Use application to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. A notice of public hearing will be issued at least 14 days prior to the hearing date. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc. [ D. 61018 Tamara Fix From: Rudi Alcott [ralcott@fedwaymirror.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 8:27 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Mission Church Legal Notice No problem. We will get this in for you. Take care, -------------------- Rudi Alcott Publisher Federal Way Mirror p: 253.925.5565 x-1050 c: 253.336.5359 t: 206.390.5925 On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fix@ci!yoffederalw�com> wrote: Please publish the following legal notice (FW Mission Church NOA & Opt DNS, 12-101554) in Friday's (May 11, 2012) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. Thanks! Tamara Fix -gdmin Asst. ON of FederaC -Way tamara. CixocityoffederaCway.coin "When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile." Unknown No OMNI eoe -s n IN NOR IN oil am I ✓-�_a r7 Web date: 04/26/2007 King County Department of Development and Environ EG*11VF Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057-5212 APR 0 6 2012 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 WATER AVAILABILITY: KING COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF � WATER AVAILABILITY ERUIN[� For alternate formats, call 206-296-6600. This certificate provides the PCOEWeF'lf�F-D,49016 WRi�g County Department and the Department of Development and Environmental SeryicerGh information necessary to evaluate development proposals Do not write in this box Number ./ •Building Permit ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD ❑ Rezone or other: Name Applicant's name: i Q j IFX ,/ Proposed use: CAMR"4?=t21)C— L&T Location (attach map and legal description if necessary): Of . O gar v4 9 �? a. Watei can be provided by service connection only to an existing r to INC Qom_ (size) water main that is OR r — 15 feet from the site. w b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: ❑ (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or ❑ (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or ry itiy �e ilk 0(itQ -0 I1-4Lacp•-'E { (3) Other (describe): CIL. r'f+t;s 1r. f"rDeu-�fi►w-i ✓ 2. a. OR mance with The water system is in confora County approved water comprehensive plan. ❑ b. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval.) 3. a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. ✓ 4. a- Water is or will be available at the rate of flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant— r feet from the building/property (or as marked on the attached map): Rate of flow at Peak Demand: ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ 500 to 999 gpm IL 1000 gpm or more ❑ flow test of gpm ❑ calculation of gpm Duration: ❑ less than 1 hour El1 hour to 2 hours ® 2 hours or more Other: OR (Note: Commercial building permits which include multifamily structures require flow test or calculation.) ❑ b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. 5. ® a. OR Water system has certificates of water rights or water right claims sufficient to provide service. ❑ b. Water system does not currently have necessary ter rights or wat r rig ht claims.. ✓ Comments/conditions: WA -'FA 5M"CE oe�NKE-1a� Pc�crt`��� ! �- SRsPlrat[ ild,[tGPI-�vId• I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be validforone year from date of signature. LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT (3 ILL- 4vC:�SdJy Agency name Sig tory nam r✓ N G � }� �- Title Signature 1A 3 lZ Date J ✓_ _ all, /- -- — Ind 38 Pressure Zone; Highest Elevation of Property 7 ZS ` IS ;Est Min. Pressure �y r S 3 psi ! _ Lowest Max. The District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay or deny water service based upon capacity limitations in District and other Purveyor facilities. Water availability form Rev. 05-19-2003 Page 1 of 1 Page 2 of 2 © 2006: Lakehaven Utility District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy or any racuay rnrormarron snown. racmry locations and conditions are subject to field verification. http://columbia/lion/map. aspx 3/26/2012 NAP 3392ip0?YO —lam 2329709340.1329Y00310 2s107a0.sv 241a�3U9530—. `••'''"""'"' 33921p028t7 ' r I i _4 1-2d1330'0570 y 2Rl330D290 � f � ! ~ :>d13:39033J I 2df3330�30 � r J 23xsro91ssa � xs2�%D9s2a a329rn9279 !� t 0821049005 - gg 241330049 _ t 2413300590 24f 330t}2St7 S3t15MST - -1330Cf1YK!!•�- xg1x3�98s9 a�z9 Tppi 9�! � zR'J330D84D 247339ti23R xdissQfl�oG � 3392300297 2329709230 i r 1 i t 2413300210 I �i / ; 24 f 3300f130 I N 24 7331lD F40 24 f 33002ifri ' 2329%00200 2329799420 I �df3rT308S0 �� I j r�2dF330.718fl r .362TJ4917aG, j��._ ?�f,f330A200 A13300170 0821049058 �21009J� 232ffYU9.�1�5 ` 24f 3300'!9� i �✓I L 2413307(i90 2a13300870 24133t1021g�°`y r �{ t M1 8G%2G502r11 6ff7mv;4D ? 6672G00060i 7 i s3 mgT a413300360 &672G5FftCx GtSY26sl4il3f1 •� GA72G50�3n \ ��,, /s � "Gf12G59040 2413300880 72G002$0 i' � G%aG590%q r �- • f 241r00 33900 1 2{Fl3300159 GSiY2F50030 241330107p x6.13W9920 ! t 24?33fi0890 f I — G7265028A �f � GGI2G50110 � !�, 726501b0 i .�'SG72S'v9138s� ,�+� &G7aG�i0520;' �, 6672Si59090 �� � GFi72_B§0320 6fi7aG00i6D °7 r iQ�' 66/2659/90 G6726. 310 IR 6572rv�330 .r 661265020D i ti '3,>,`•f85faltiC7 k$ �d['' 2t1 •P 9 241=1 0821049262 0821049070 13923049239 0 2d 3GDOYU 0621049055 0$ 455'JJ7 i0 — ' 2MONO4��-y 0821049227 t 241=w4 05.160�109 0821049242 E f 0srli453am 2i1s3D99s9 s'; z Pre d e r a l W a� 08a T049a.53� � �y ' -� ne�isso9Ds>a r 0621049057 241; J`062104VS4 FS000 { 087s9d90G! ±�! \ 0+3?70R92iY y 08R857fl3>0'1-1 u 084 500940 OSaf049132 08210492m 082 1t349 Y1 08�i8s00 i1A 08210490M tIl ff 03210493 Gs4o�n� Drtru ostGF la39a 12 ps21Dd4209s � , 082104910E 0$21p4991U 0621049161 08210490B7 r y 0821049144 r 0821049145 �'p881049029 0$21049f2$i 1 I I t r '" s 3 m•►f cr rx47GOLi0r0� ��— �� Ti5R76D9109 39 � � �55dYGOOfYp� Pr6flG 80 5547600160 20, fOd9190 082TU49236 0821049178 — I0. r k 0821049204rfoR�23s 'Vu/,,u�1c�w• 1 86D3•iA004D� � Sfr*33di1U94"ai t�G03403*335• $fxD3R3Dfl301 736p3409D30} �. 661kY4000.r5.1 to .$508+FOii02a'$THi3d0'J'3Gfl �-8'G0�493G51 8[iO3r 4'J9720� I 86D3R03lJfa� ((I I 4 StGD3•t00010� --- t 8Fa£,'349306fl' - -- -- %9dz1, 79d39000.90 ..! � 79�i-380-0Jd0 7943=3050 79f300090 7ggjo0J10 0821049153 08210490930T1p 19430f00 --FC1 1tiKingCnunty .. 5t;it3.G�S��30IR5i1 NST ' 269k 08210d9035 The intorrnallon induded on this map has bean cemplied by 9109 County staff[ From a variety of swn= and Is sutsject to change without 011=1 King Cuuniy makes no rmpresontailons or warrantees, express or impited, as to accuracy. completeness, tlmelinass, or rights to thn use of such mTormalV Thfs document is not intended far use as a xurvey product. }Gng CounlK ,trap no[ be kable for any gantel, special, induact, meidenlel, x consequenl�i 1\� damages ir4ch,ding, but net limited lo, losl revenues or toss pmfll8 nasvltatg From the use or Misuse of the u1Fam+aa tpnlaklcd tm this map. Any sale of L-Q Ihis map ur tnfprtnahan on Isis map Is prohUled Bxcept by written pamrissK+n of Knp County. Date: 410012 Source: )Gng County MAP - Properly Iniormatmn (http:fhw mattckt:.govlGI$AMAP) APR U 6 201Z CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS i_I County Boundary x Mountain Peaks Highways Forest Production District Boundary istuction DtrictBoundary Urban Growth Area Line j Incorporated Area Streets tligh+aay Arterials Local Lakes and Large Rivers Streams ��. Tribal Lands Parcels Legend Parks Unincorporated KC Zoning A-10- Agrlcu Mural, one DU per W a:res A-35 - Agricultural, one D U pet; 3S sores L~ F - Forest M - Mineral RA-2.5 - Rural Area, one DU per 5 acres RA-5 - Rural Area, one D U Pe; 5 acres RA-10 - Rural Area., one DU Pa IQ ages UP - Ur"n Rewwrm one DU per 5 acres R�l - Residential, one DU per acre R-4- Residential, 4 DU Per acre C RAI - Residential, 6 DU Pe%scro I R-g - Residential, @ D U acr acre L— �- R•12 - Residential,l2 DU pet acre I f�T R-18 - Residential, 16 DU Pet acre i R-24. - Residential. 24. DU per acre R-4 - Residential afi D U Per acts �I (cont) NB - Neighborhood Business CCo _ - communilyBN.ene s RB - Regional Business D0-Office 1- Indus rial Other The information included on lhis map has been compiled by King County ssafl from a +ratiaty of sources and Ke subject to change WtNou[ nonce. ,mg County makes no representatiaen awarranties, expreess w +npGed. as to aaivaey, cempleleness, 6melireass, or rights to the use of such informefioh. This document is not rAendetd for Use as a survey product. Kling County shad not be viable for any general, spacial. inducer, mdan tffiK, or consep. Any sale of LQ � damages including. but not limited to. lost revenues or lost pmMs reWting tram the use or misuse of the rnfonrnetion cantoinad on Ibis map. Any sale of King County Oft map or hrfnrmation on Ibis map Is prohlbi led except by wriften permissfan of long County. Date: 4AM12 Source: K ng County NAP - Property lnformabon thtipJhm .rrwVakc.gavlGiSFMAP) a c 9y$2V• .2 �101 G13C n TH ST. ----- r — — — 9 Ag. 6 s 25 W N N s 1.39 45 h I 00250� � y lOryu^ 19� ��O/ to 45- 93 1010 iib .y Aa rs 8347 SF '116 S 79`53`06 x m �oi'� sss %7226 , 0250 97 ,C,`!�g.� 3 y�� � G a o�' 9p QI Q en r+ r d� �� g w`� o H °` °z°22 n' v 23 24 66365 26 S'J \��� 02M,- \ 5 17. 2i00"00 u'i 1t 2 $ 6861 M1 8012 S w 9142 S s 8546 SF rQ S \ o Z� �� `r 100 n 0 0220 � 0230 0240 ? 0, ,f y \•� 39 25 ma's �, 10o0 2 2 70 �0 89�.09 105.8-1 D _)0-:r. s �p w 165s0 99 241330 �j 9( O 0mo Q 0990 3� 241330 \ `r 97 r 1 2 za133o .9s asp 70 � 98 s \ " 0980 3o ry N y9239 -, 082104 O 0.29 AC �� 3� R-25 9239 - 39.27 0 55 �Gfi , 24 ti \0ow 6 yg•o �s }'� 0060 �0 4 9= 0.23 AC �c'�• 15S 9227 ? T'nI{C I 9057 Ln C 049253 � 0.28 AC 1.54 AC 9253 pas 9055 149 0a1 4 9�\, SURR. 798 & EST. 8-4-1930, C.C. VOL. 30-251 ) N )-33-37 E 2639.44 RD. N 89-56-08 W d - -- - - - - - -- T - - - - - - - 893 N 89-56-08i W N I � c � ------------ 1 4ti 30' 30 Ati 0.38 A 9209 30 135 27v.61 8605150919 C O 8601240924 - 12' LD��4L uJA`t' 17806 :: -e 1 082104 1 9m P1 130 9010 I APR 0 6 2012 M to st-tIs " aj CITY OF FEDEkAI_. WAY of ; CDS 0821N 915 FEDERAL ASSOCIATES, i and Civil Engine APR 0 6 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 10, 2012 TO: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer ■ Development Services • Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: FOR DRC MTG. ON.- FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS ZONING DISTRICT. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT., Matt Herrera, Associate Planner April 19, 2012 — Internal completeness review and project discussion 12-101554-00-UP 10-103868-PC FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH PARKING LOT EXPANSION 405 S 312TH ST RS 7.2 Proposal to construct 190-stall parking lot on parcel 082104 9057 located across South 312th from the Church. Process IV, SEPA BK DESIGN BRIAN KIM 36006 11T11 AVE SW Federal Way, WA 98023 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: 1. Master Land Use application (8) 2. Development Requirements Checklist 3. Vicinity Map (2) 4. Assessor Map (2) 5. King County iMap (1) 6. Title Report (2) 7. Environmental Checklist (8) 8. Traffic Management Plan and Parking Analysis (4) 9. Traffic Impact Analysis (4) 10. Certificate of Water Availability (2) 11. Preliminary Technical Information Report (4) 12. Topographic Survey Sheet 1 (8) 13. Site Plan Sheet A101 (8) 14. Landscaping Plan Sheet L1 (8) 15. Civil Plans Sheet 1 (8) Date: April 28, 2012 Property Owner Name: Property Owner Address: Authorization Letter Federal Way Mission Church 405 312* St. SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Dear who may concern, We, Federal Way Mission Church Building Committee and Elders Committee authorize Brian Kim to represent our church and to sign documents for the church. Brian Kim is a member of Federal Way Mission Church Building Committee, and Project Manager for the 'vFederal Way i,llission Church Parking Lot Design". He has full authorization from us to sign the documents as the church owner for the "Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot Design". Sincerely Committee Director: C! Senior Elder Committee: r Financial Committee: (PA) n'W &Rtq� CITY of x CITY ®F FEDERAL- v,. Federal Way CDF APPLICATION NO(S) MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION 12_(DII�E,"-ooUP 1z,t1C) I S55-ao sc;� DEPARTMENT OF COMmuWy DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8'" Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www. cityof federal way. cam Project Name FEderal Way Mission Church Parking Lot Expansion Property Address/Location Not Available Date April 6, 2012 Parcel Number(s) 0821049057 0�??.Z 1 0'-A - Z Uy Project Description Covert a current vacant lot to a church parking lot from across 312th street nl SAS, PVVVT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) X Process 1V (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI X SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RS7.2 _7-oning Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation 0 Value of Existing Improvements 2 5, 0 0 0.0 Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): None occupancy Type None Construction Type Bulletin #003 - January 1, 2011 Applicant Name: Brian Kim Address: 36006 llth Ave SW City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98023 Phone: 253-332-3625 Fax: n/a Email: bkdesign66@gmail.com Signature:,N /.:z . Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Federal Way Mission Church Address:405 South 312th Street City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-839-3200 Fax: 253-839-2401 ©V�� Email: n/a 5, Signature:,,�� 1� Page 1 of 1 (.t-- k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application CITY OF Federal June 6, 2012 Tim and Liz Longenecker 357 South 309'h Street Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com RE: File #12-101554-00-UP; RESPONSE TO CITIZEN INQUIRY FW Mission Church Parking Lot, 405 South 312`h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. & Mrs. Longenecker: Thank you for your recent letter regarding the FW Mission Church Parking Lot Master Land Use application currently under review. A decision on the application will be made by the city's Hearing Examiner following the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) threshold determination and a public hearing. Public hearings are scheduled after the applicant has designed the site to standards set forth in the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) as they relate to zoning, stormwater, and transportation. City staff provides a recommendation and report to the Hearing Examiner at least seven days prior to the public hearing. CITY RESPONSE I've copied your comments/questions (italicized) and provided response below each item. 1. Sunday morning traffic congestion along 312`h Street. It is already difficult to get out onto 312`h Street from S`h Way without the addition of 190 cars on the north side of the street. The applicant does not anticipate the parking lot to be at full capacity following the completion of this project nor does the applicant propose expansion of the church at this time. The applicant proposes to provide the additional 30-plus stalls for its current needs plus additional capacity -for future growth. Any redevelopment or expansion of the church will require additional traffic analysis to address safety and concurrency needs. The applicant will be responsible to improve any intersection failures if/when the church redevelops. 2. Pedestrian safety. How will 190+ people safely cross 3121h Street during high volume traffic time without causing accidents and traffic congestion? The applicant has proposed a circulation plan consisting of a pedestrian pathway originating from the parking lot to the South 312`h Street frontage sidewalk. Parishioners will then head north approximately 60 feet to a proposed mid -block pedestrian crossing. The mid -block crossing will be similar to other recently installed crossings within the city and consist of ADA accessible curb -ramp, marked asphalt, mid -street pedestrian refuge island with rectangular rapid-fire beacon. Parishioners will then access the church property from the south sidewalk on South 312'h Street. The exact location of the mid -block crossing has not been determined and may be relocated during engineering review. 1 The "Transportation Management Plan for the current church provided a conservative estimate of 102 stalls using the number of attendees at the 85 h percentile. The church currently has 70 existing stalls. Mr. & Mrs. Longenecker June 6, 2012 Page 2 City staff will request the applicant's traffic engineer to investigate any queuing issues that would be caused by pedestrian mid -block crossing. Staff will forward you results of the investigation when it becomes available. 3. Security. A large parking lot in a wooded area could become a hangout for gangs, under -age drinking, drug use, etc. The parking lot will be required to meet the principles of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design.(CPTED). These principles enforce natural surveillance, access control, and ownership. As currently proposed, the development would include lighting, perimeter fencing, and limited ingress/egress opportunities. Such improvements will provide a greater risk of being seen, challenged, or caught. An improved site will likely provide less incentive for illicit behavior than an undeveloped and heavily vegetated site. 4. Privacy for the homes that border the proposed parking lot (foot traffic cutting through the parking lot and our yards as a short cut). The applicant has proposed a sight -obscuring fence six feet in height surrounding the property. A perimeter landscaping screen 10 feet in width consisting of evergreen trees shrubs and groundcover will also be included. 5. Buffer for noise and lights. The 10-foot-wide perimeter landscaping screen and fence will be installed as mentioned above. Lighting is limited to poles 20 feet in height with cut-off shields to limit glare off -site. 6. Landscaping to screen out the parking lot from the vision of the neighborhood. As mentioned previously, the applicant will be required to install a 10-foot-wide Type I landscaping screen. The intent of a Type I screen is to provide a solid site barrier within three years of planting. A sight obscuring fence six feet in height is also proposed. 7. Possible decline ofproperty value and resale for home owners in the area. The city is unaware of any correlation between as -of -right uses adversely affecting property values. CLOSING You and your letter's undersigned neighbors have been added as a party of record to the MLU application. As a party of record you and those that signed the letter will receive the notice of public hearing, staff report to the hearing examiner, and will have standing to appeal the land use decision if you so desire. Please feel free to contact me with further questions and/or concerns at 253-835-2638 or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Matthew errera Associate Planner enc: October 2011 Traffic Counts on S.312`h St. 12-101554 Doe. LD 61199 Z) ti�iJW� fi�fi } , ` �r LLG4dY� CfYY tlF Fedela�&y U Rec NOTICE OF ivitASTl�ft LAND USE APPLICATION AND 0�1 %1 ' a OP Y IONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) egAo Gj�me: Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot Project Description: Proposed construction of an ancillary 190-stall at-Irade parking facility that will support the Federal Way Mission Church services across the street at 405 South 312 Street. Stormwater control facility, exterior lighting, and landscaping are also associated with the proposal. Subject property is a 2.3-acre vacant parcel located in a Single -Family Residential (RS 7.2) zone. Applicant: Brian Kim, BK Design, 36006 1 16'Ave SW, Federal Way, WA 98023 Project Location: King County Parcel 082104-9057. Parcel is located on the north side of South 312`h Street at the intersection of4`s Avenue South. Application Received: April 6, 2012 Notice of Application: May 11, 2012 Determined Complete: May 2, 2012 SEPA Comments Due: May 25, 2012 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist, and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits Under Review: Use Process IV (File #12-101554-UP), Concurrency (File #12-101556-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Threshold Determination (File #12-101555-SE) Environmental Documents & Studies: Transportation Management Plan, Traffic Impact Analysis, SEPA Checklist, and Preliminary Technical Information Report Relevant Environmental Documents Are Available at the Address Below: Yes Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14, "Environmental Policy;" Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code" Public Comment & Appeals: The environmental comment period ends May 25, 2012. Any person may submit written comments regarding the Master Land Use application to the Hearing Examiner by delivering these comments to the Community and Economic Development Department prior to the public hearing date or by giving these directly to the Hearing Examiner at the public hearing. A notice of public hearing will be issued at least 14 days prior to the hearing date. Only the applicant, persons who submit written or verbal comments to the Hearing Examiner, or persons who specifically request a copy of the written decision may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional DNS. A copy of the DNS may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file is available for public review during normal business hours at the Department of Community and Economic Development, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc I D 61018 i Regarding the Master Land Use application for Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot (Doc ID 61018, King County Parcel 082104-9057), we the undersigned neighbors near/adjoining the property in question have the following concerns, which we would like a written response to from developer regarding plans for how to deal with: 1. Sunday moming traffic congestion along 312`h Street. It is already difficult to get out onto 312"' Street from 5`' Way without the addition on 190 cars on the north side of the street. 2. Pedestrian safety. How will 190+ people safely cross 312' Street during high volume traffic time without causing accidents and traffic congestion? 3. Security. A large parking lot in a wooded area could become a hangout for gangs, under- age drinking, drug use, etc. 4. Privacy for the homes that border the proposed parking lot (foot traffic cutting through the parking lot and our yards as a short cut). 5. Buffer for noise and lights. 6. Landscaping to screen out the parking lot from the vision of the neighborhood. 7. Possible decline of property value and resale for home owners in the area. Printed name: f� u h4 12- kv /J GC lJc %j]�Z Property address: 3S;� 3GL Signature: o U Printed name:'Z''jZANNO'N Property address S I _ S . Signature: )J. 30ytLS/, reoGVwL �A-� w-M, 7Vzq Printed name: fl -p- crrL +�`ee�c.��� Property address: J54- S . 3bI Printed name: L � Kh ath Property address: 30�1 ( ��/ S � CA � A Signature: Printed name: v • it T H t4 lv Property address: Signature: - Printed name: ,S u. 1� Property address: 3 Signature: f ea1 . 1zIa,Y I w A Printed name: Property address: 3 [�' ��� �. �,� �''• (n Signature: lu Printed name: a L-- P l ! I Property address: S Signature: Printed name: M-A � +li /l/ P� L i# Property address: S 7 1 �vl_;6`7 s� rL L � �� VIAop rty Signature: 9�1,61pk Printed name: -b 0 15 + a Property address: ' 3 5, Signature: F,) �a l Wa WA q�S (203 gn Printed name: Property address: 3�-5 So�� 4. �`�ST Signature: r RECEIVED January 21, 2013 To: Matthew Herrera, Associate Planner Federal Way JAN 21 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Regarding the December 12th, 2012 response from Brian Kim to neighbor concerns provided in regard to the Master Land Use application for Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot (Doc ID 61018, King County Parcel 082104-9057), please consider the following replies below. Sunday morning traffic congestion along 312th Street. It is already difficult to get out onto 312th Street from 5th Way without the addition of 190 cars on the north side of the street. December 12th Response, Brian Kim: "There won't be new additional building and traffic. We just relocate parking lot from existing site to new location." January 21 neighbor reply: Mr. Kim's response implies that the church will no longer use the current parking lot, while at the same time saying there will be no additional building. • What will be done with the current parking lot? ■ Would a better solution be to continue to use the current parking lot and build a more modest sized parking lot across the street? • Will the church use the existing parking lot or the proposed new one for the daily 6am prayer meetings? 2. Pedestrian safety. How will 190+ people safely cross 312tn Street during high volume traffic time without causing accidents and traffic congestion? December 12th Response, Brian Kim: "Flash lights crosswalk and crosswalk guard will be provided to prevent accident during service times" January 21 neighbor reply: Mr. Kim's response does not address the traffic congestion which will occur when people will have to cross 312tn street. • Currently with the parking lot on the same side of the street as the church there is no crossing of 312th street required. By installing flash lights and crosswalk guards, traffic on 312th street will have to consistently stop to allow congregation members to cross the street, essentially bringing all traffic on 312tn street to a standstill during the time before services when the congregation is arriving and needing to cross as well at the end of services when they're leaving. This will potentially have a negative impact not only on anyone trying to get out of the neighborhood onto 312th during that time, but also on people trying to get to St Luke's church or to the Good Shepherd Episcopal church. 3. Security. A large parking lot in a wooded area could become a hangout for gangs, under -age drinking, drug use, etc. December 12th Response, Brian Kim: "Open and organized parking lot with light will provide better securities that dark wooden area." January 21 neighbor reply: In 18 years of living next to the current wooded area, there have been no security issues with the existing wooded area. • The area is difficult to get to with the only access being on 312th street or through people's back yards, many of which are fenced. By removing all the trees and making a nice paved area, the church will be inviting easy access and increasing the security risk, not reducing it. • We are specifically concerned about the far end of the parking lot being easily accessed, unmonitored and inviting for criminal activity. • Are there any plans for lighting in the parking lot? How will the lights be controlled and what will be done to assure that they do not glare into people's homes adjacent to the proposed parking lot? 4. Privacy for the homes that border the proposed parking lot (foot traffic cutting through the parking lot and our yards as a short cut). December 12th Response, Brian Kim: "Current vertical elevation changes are between 2'-0"—11'-0' with existing wood fence. Swing gates at entry and exit are also additional security to enter the property. Foot traffic would discourage to use this area." January 21 neighbor reply: Mr Kim's response talks about a fence and gates. ■ It is not clear from the drawing plans if there will be a 6'2" wooden fence around the entire perimeter of the proposed parking lot or if that is just an option. Please clarify. ■ What specifically will be done to discourage foot traffic to the area? It seems that by making an attractive paved parking lot, it would be just the opposite and encourage foot traffic. • We can't tell from the plans what the design of the gate is or from the proposal what the expectations are for how the gate will be used or secured. We are concerned that without a locked gate, there will be uncontrolled traffic back into the parking lot at any hour of the day, any day of the week. G Will the swing gate be locked when the parking lot is not is use or will any car be able to get into the parking lot at any time. 5. Buffer for noise and lights. December 12th Response, Brian Kim: "Landscape and trees are help to prevent the noise to travel." January 21 neighbor reply: Mr. Kim's response does not say anything about lighting. We are very concerned that cars at the far end of the proposed parking would have lights shine directly into the houses that are adjacent to the property — specifically while we're trying to sleep or in the summer while we're in the back yard, adjacent to the proposed parking lot. • We believe that landscaping and trees could be done in a way that is attractive and positive — however it could also be poorly done. What guarantees are there that the landscaping will be done well and will be maintained? 6. Landscaping to screen out the parking lot from the vision of the neighborhood. December 12th Response, Brian Kim: "Rockery and landscape plants would maximize view of neighborhood, and replace dark unorganized wood area." January 21 neighbor reply: Mr. Kim's response is confusing. • What does Mr. Kim mean by "maximize view of neighborhood"? • As stated above in reply to # 5, what guarantees are there that the landscaping will be done well and will be maintained? 7. Possible decline of property value and resale for homeowners in the area December 12th Response, Brian Kim: "Well organized parking lot will not decrease value of property." January 21 neighbor reply: We strongly disagree with Mr. Kim's assessment of the impact of a parking lot on property value of adjacent property. Typically home buyers pay a premium to have their property be adjacent to a green belt or wooded area. By removing the current wooded area, we believe the relative value of the adjacent properties will decline. Tim and Liz Longenecker 357 S. 309th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Response to Correction Letter June 8, 2012 Brian Kim BK Design 36006 11'h Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 RE: FILE #12-101554-00-UP; TECHNICAL COMMENT ADDENDUM FW Mission Church Parking Lot, 405 South 312`h Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Kim: The Community and Economic Development Department is currently reviewing the applicant's Process IV Master Land Use application for parking improvements to the existing Federal Way Mission Church. The purpose of this letter is to add several items that have been presented to staff by the surrounding community and to addend the May 2, 2012, Letter of Complete Application and Technical Review. COMMUNITY INQUHtY The city received the following questions/concerns signed by 13 neighbors that reside near the proposed parking area. The department has addressed each item as it relates to the city code, but the neighbors also request the applicant to respond to each item. Please submit responses to each item below as a component of the resubmittal package request in the above -referenced May 2 letter. I . Sunday morning traffic congestion along 31201 Street. It is already difficult to get out onto 312t` Street from 5h Way without the addition on 190 cars on the north side of the street. Response to Correction There won't be new additional building and traffic. We just relocate parking lot from existing site to new location. 2. Pedestrian safety. How will 190+ people safely cross 312'h Street during high volume traffic time without causing accidents and traffic congestion? Response to Correction Flash lights crosswalk and crosswalk guard will be provided to prevent accident during service time. 3. Security. A large parking lot in a wooded area could become a hangout for gangs, under -age drinking, drug use, etc. Response to Correction Open and organize parking lot with light will provide better securities that dark wooden area. 4. Privacy for the homes that border the proposed parking lot (foot traffic cutting through the parking lot and our yards as a short cut). Response to Correction Current vertical elevation changes are between 2'-0" — 11'-0" with existing wood fence. Swing gates at the entry and exit are also additional security to enter the property. Foot traffic would discourage to use this area. 5. Buffer for noise and lights. Response to Correction Landscapes and trees are help to prevent the noise to travel. 6. Landscaping to screen out the parking lot from the vision of the neighborhood. Response to Correction Rockery and landscape plants would maximize view of the neighborhood, and replace dark unorganized wood area. 7. Possible decline of property value and resale for home owners in the area. Response to Correction Well organized parking lot will not decrease value of property. Mr. Kim June 8, 2012 Page 2 TECIINICAL COMMENT ADDENDUM These comments augment the staff technical comments provided in the May 2 letter. Please provide responses to each item with the resubmittal package. 1. Transportation — Several neighbors of the subject property have concerns regarding traffic congestion caused by the mid -block pedestrian crossing. Specific concerns relate to how the mid - block crossing will affect vehicles at the intersection of South 3120' Street and 5t' Way South. Please have your transportation consultant contact Sarady Long at 253-835-2743 or sarady.lyng{-ia,cityoffederalway.com to discuss additional analysis that the city will require prior to issuing an environmental determination. Response to Correction Traffic Engineer, Mark Tai responses with his report. 2. Future Improvements — The site plan indicates a pastor residential building and multi -purpose structure. Please provide details for future uses and buildings. Response to Correction We do not have plan for future improvement at this point. 3. Fencing — Please provide fencing details for the property's perimeter. Response to Correction Retaining rockery wall is already 6'-0"—11'-0" height. We will look into eliminate the fence, but we will do if city ask us to install fence. Woof fence detail is submitted. 4. Notice Affidavit — Please submit the signed affidavit for the yellow notice board installation. Response to Correction Notice was already submitted and sign was installed. APPLICATION STATUS As of today, the 120-day review period has stopped with 0 days used. The review period will begin again within 14 days of a complete resubmittal of items requested/corrected in the May 2 letter and this addendum. When resubmitting requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, four copies of corrected reports, six copies of corrected full size plans, and two copies of 11x17 plans with the enclosed resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The Federal Way Revised Code can be reviewed in its entirety at http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/FederalWay/ If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Matthew Herrera Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer 12-101554 Doc. LD.61359 Ph 253-896-1011 Fx 253-896-2633 Federal Way Mission Church 405 S. 312th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Attn: Mr. Brian Kim GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Hwy. E., Suite 16 Fife, Washington 98424 May 22, 2012 RESUBMITTED AUG 14 2013 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Geotechnical Evaluation Infiltration Feasibility and Testing Maggies Meadow Residential Plat 400 Block of S 312� Street Federal Way, Washington PN: 0821049057 Job: FederalWayMissionChurch.S312th.L INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE This letter summarizes the results of our geotechnical evaluation for the infiltration of the site stormwater at the subject site located at the 400 Block of South 312th Street in the City of Federal Way, Washington. The approximate location of the site is shown on Figure 1. We were provided with a Geotechnical report, prepared by others, and a preliminary site plan showing the lot and roadway configuration, as well as the existing and planned site topography. Our understanding of the project is based on our review of the geotechnical report and site plan provided to us, our conversations with the project civil engineer, our site exploration, and our experience with similar projects in the vicinity of the site. We understand the project will consist of 9 single-family residential lots with an on site roadway, lot -specific infiltration facilities, and a stormwater pond. The stormwater pond will be located in the sites' northeast corner, adjacent South 312t' Street. Site grading will be limited to construction of the on site roadway and the stormwater pond. The purpose of our service was to perform a subsurface exploration in the planned location of the stormwater facility to determine if infiltration will be feasible. Specifically, the scope of services for this project included the following: 1. Reviewing the available geologic, hydrogeologic and geotechnical data for the site area. 2. Exploring the subsurface conditions in the planned location of the stormwater facilities by monitoring the excavation of several track -hoe excavated test pits. 3. Performing infiltration tests in the location of, and at the planned elevations of the stormwater pond, and representative areas for the lot -specific systems. 4. Addressing the appropriate geotechnical regulatory requirements for the proposed stormwater facility. 5. Providing our opinion regarding the feasibility of infiltrating the site stormwater. 6. Providing an infiltration rate based on the insitu-testing. Federal Way Mission Church May 22, 2012 Page 2 7. Providing recommendations and design criteria for construction of the stormwater facilities. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The rectangular, approximate 2.3-acre project site is located along the north side of South 312th Street at the intersection of South 312'h Street and 4th Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington. The project site is bordered with residential properties to the north, east and west, and South 312th Street to the south. The surface grades in the vicinity of the site generally slope down from east to west at inclinations ranging from 5 to 15 percent. However, within the site borders, surface grades are generally undulating with variations in elevation ranging from 3 to 8 feet. Site vegetation consists of various medium-sized evergreen and deciduous trees with relatively thin underbrush. No areas of significant erosion were apparent on the site slopes; no standing water was observed on the site at the time of our site work Subsurface Explorations On February 2, 2008, an engineering technician from our office was on site to explore subsurface conditions by observing the excavation of 6 track hoe test pit to a maximum depth of 20 feet below existing surface grades. The approximate test pit locations are shown on Figure 2. The engineering technician continuously monitored the excavation, maintained a log of the subsurface conditions encountered in the test pit, obtained representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. The specific number, location, and depth of the explorations were selected by GeoResources personnel in the field. The soils encountered were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) described on Figure 3. The explorations performed as part of this evaluation indicate conditions only at the specific locations and the subsurface conditions in other locations could vary. The test pit logs are shown on Figures 4 and 5. Representative soil samples obtained from the test pit were placed in sealed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Grain -size analysis was performed on three of the samples. The results of our grain -size analysis are shown on Figures 6 through 8. Subsurface Conditions The subsurface conditions encountered in the test pit were generally uniform and consistent with the mapped stratigraphy in the area. The soils we observed in the test pits generally consisted of gravel with silt and sand consistent with recessional outwash overlying silty gravel with sand consistent with glacial till. The recessional outwash observed in the upper 2 to 4 feet of the test pits consisted of moist, medium dense, gravel with varying amounts of silt and sand. The glacial till underlying the recessional outwash consisted of moist, dense, moderately cemented silty gravel with sand. All of our test pits were terminated in the dense glacial till. We did not encounter groundwater seepage in the test pit excavated at the site. Based on the mapped stratigraphy, we anticipate during periods of wet weather, a perched groundwater table may develop within the dense glacial till at depths below our explorations. This water table will fluctuate seasonally due to, precipitation, and future Federal Way Mission Church May 22, 2012 Page 3 development both on and off site. Figures 4 and 5 present a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions encountered in the test pit. The approximate test pit location is shown on Figure 2. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our subsurface evaluation and infiltration testing, it is our opinion the soil and groundwater conditions at the site are suitable for infiltration of the site stormwater. The lot -specific infiltration systems should consist of typical infiltration trenches as shown in The King County Surface Water Design Manual. We recommend the infiltration facilities be provided with an overflow to the stormwater system located along the sites' interior roadway. Infiltration Testing We performed a total of three infiltration tests at the site. We performed one infiltration test in the southeast corner of the stormwater pond, one in the western central portion of Lot 2, and one in the approximate center of Lot 4. The infiltration test in the stormwater pond was performed at a depth of 7 feet below surface grades (approximate Elev. 406). The infiltration tests in Lots 2 and 4 were performed at depths of 2.5 and 1.5 feet below surface grades, respectively. According to the city of Federal Way Municipal Code, the city of Federal Way uses the King County Surface Water Design Manual as their stormwater code. We performed our infiltration tests in accordance with the Department of Ecology Falling Head Percolation Test Procedure. Our infiltration test results along with the design rates are shown in the following table: Test Rate Design Rate* Test Location (in/hr) (In/hr )_ Pond 18 3.0 Lot 2 15 2.5 Lot 4 18 3.0 * The design rates have a factor of safety equal to 6 applied. Suspended solids could clog the underlying soil and reduce the infiltration rate for the systems. To reduce potential clogging of the infiltration systems, the infiltration systern should not be connected to the stormwater runoff system until after construction is complete and the site areas are landscaped and paved. Temporary stormwater systems may be utilized throughout construction. These temporary systems should be located away from the permanent location of the infiltration facility. Federal Way Mission Church May 22, 2012 Page 4 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please do not hesitate to call with any additional comments or questions. Respectfully submitted, GeoResources, LLC EITH S%OTT SUMS Ke S. Schembs, LEG Principal KSS:BMA:bpk/rmp Document ID: FederalWayMissionChurch.S312th.L Attachments: Figure 1 — Site Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Figure 3 — USCS Figures 4 and 5 — Test Pit Logs Figures 6 through 8 — Grain -size Analysis Brett M. Allen, PE Sr. Engineer Approximate Site Location GeoResources, LLG Site Vicinity Map 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16 400 Block of South 312t1' Street Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Federal Way, Washington Fax: 253-896-2633 DocID: FederalWayMissionChurch.S312th.SVM ` May 2012 r I I I I � ICU ., �. w.a I 3 - •—•- cr J Z Ap -3 rig 6th Nay South I f SE 114, NW 114, SEC. 8, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. ? �r.r . T. 0 w i l V= agar 1 a 1 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP GROUP NAME MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL GRAVEL CLEAN GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAVEL GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL COARSE GRAINED More than 50% SOILS Of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained on WITH FINES No. 4 Sieve GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND More than 50% Retained on SP POORLY -GRADED SAND No. 200 Sieve More than 50% Of Coarse Fraction SAND SM SILTY SAND Passes WITH FINES No. 4 Slave Sc CLAYEY SAND SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC ML SILT FINE CL CLAY GRAINED SOILS Liquid Limit Less than 50 ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More than 50% CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY Passes No. 200 Sieve Liquid Limit ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT 50 or more HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: NOTES: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry- Absence of moisture, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. Moist- Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is ASTM D2487-90. obtained from below water table 3. Description of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and or test data. GeoResources, LLC Unified Soil Classification System 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16 400 Block of South 3121h Street Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Federal Way, Washington Fax: 253-896-2633 DocID:FederalWayMissionChurch.S312th May2012 Test Pit TP-1 Location: Northwest corner of proposed storm drainage pond. Depth ft.) Soil Tv e Description 0.0 - 0.5 Forest Duff 0.5 - 4.0 SM Light brown silty SAND with gravel, some cobbles and roots (tree), medium dense, moist. 4.0 - 20.0 GM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand, some cobbles and boulders to 18 inches, Well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 20 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed Test Pit TP-2 Location: Southeast corner of proposed storm drainage pond. Depth ft. Soil Type Description 0.0 - 0.3 Forest Duff 0.3 - 3.5 SM Light brown GRAVEL with sand, trace silt, some cobbles and roots(tree), medium dense, moist. (Recessional Outwash) 3.5 - 6.0 GM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobblers, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 6 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed Test Pit TP-3 Location: On lot line for Lots 2 and 3 at 418' contour Depth (ft.) Soil Type Descriotion 0.0 - 0.3 Forest Duff 0.3 - 2.0 SM Light brown silty SAND with gravel, some cobbles and roots (tree), medium dense, moist. 2.0 - 4.0 SM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 4 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 Test Pit Logs 400 Block of South 312t" Street Federal Way, Washington JOB# FederalWayMissionChurch.S312thSt I February 2008 1 Figure 4 Test Pit TP-4 Location: Middle of Lot 4 on 420' contour. Depth ft. Soil Type Descri tion 0.0 - 0.5 Forest Duff 0.5 - 2.5 SM Light brown silty GRAVEL with sand, some cobbles and roots(tree), medium dense, moist. 2.5 - 3.7 SP Gray GRAVEL with silt and sand, some cobbles, medium dense, moist. (Recessional Outwash) 3.7 - 4.0 SM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 4 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed Test Pit TP-5 Location: On lot line of Lots 6 and 7 in low spot. Depth ft. Soil Type Descri Lion 0.0 - 0.2 Forest Duff 0.2 - 2.5 SM Light brown silty GRAVEL with sand, some cobbles and roots(tree), medium dense, moist. 2.5 - 3.0 SP Gray GRAVEL with silt and sand, some cobbles, medium dense, moist. (Recessional Outwash) 3.0 - 3.5 SM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 3'/z feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed Test Pit TP-6 Location: Front of Lot 8 Depth ft. Soil Type Descri tion 0.0 - 0.3 0.3 - 2.5 SM Forest Duff Light brown silty GRAVEL with sand, some cobbles and roots(tree), medium dense, moist. 2.5 - 3.0 SP Gray GRAVEL with silt and sand, some cobbles, medium dense, moist. (Recessional Outwash) 3.0 - 3.5 SM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 3'/2 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 MSM Test Pit Logs 400 Block of South 312th Street Federal Way, Washington JOB# FederalWayMissionChurc.S312thSt i February 2008 Figure 5 10C 9C 8C 7C W w 6C z LL Z 5C w 0 W 4C tL X 2C 1c C Particle Size Distribution Report IN 0 NINE I III In 1 §1 NO 1 i IN i GRAIN SIZE - mm_ % +3 % Gravel % Sand �,arsenlneCoarse Medium Fine 0.0 10.5 1 13.4 1 12.4 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC* PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 1-1/2 100.0 1-1/4 96.7 1 95.1 3/4 83.0 1 /2 69.0 3/8 63.7 #4 52.0 #10 41.5 #20 34.0 #40 28.1 #60 23.2 #100 19.3 #200 15.7 % Fines Silt 15.7 10 20 30 70 BO 90 100 Material Description Brown Silty Gravel with Sand Sampled by Matt M. on 1/31/2008 Tested by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/2008 Atterberg Limits PL= NP LL= NV PI= NP Coeffigients D85= 19.8454 D60= 7.6477 D50= 4.1604 D30= 0.5268 ❑15= D10= Cu= Cc= Classification USCS= GM AASHTO= A-1-b Remarks Entered by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/0008 F.M.=4.46 (no specification provided) Sample Number: 070292 Depth: 2 feet Location: TP-4 GeoResources, LLC client: Pool Brothers Project: S. 312th Street Fife, WA Project No: Bernie Knoll _ Tested By: Tim Bergs#rote Checked By: Bernie Knoll Date: 2/4/2008 1o0 90 80 7a a W 60 z LL Z 50 w U W 40 d 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution Report C C O O O I111111 ON 0 IN 1111111111118 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand Coarse Fine Coars Medium Fine 0.0 27.1 34.3 1 9.3 1 11.5 1 11.9 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC." PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 1-1/2 100.0 1-1/4 96.9 1 87.9 3/4 72.9 1/2 58.9 3/8 51.4 #4 38.6 #10 29.3 #20 23.4 #40 17.8 #60 12.5 #100 9.0 #200 5.9 % Fines Silt 5.9 10 )0 ao m to n m z za --1 D 30 CO m ro i0 )o too Material Descri tion Well Graded Gravel with Silt and Sand Sampled by Matt M. on 1/31/2008 Tested by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/2008 Atterberg Limits PL= NP LL= NV PI= Coefficients D85= 24.1424 D60= 13.2104 D50= 8.9667 Dg2= 2.1809 D15= 0.3247 D10= 0.1781 CU= 74.23 Cc= 2.02 Classification USCS= GW-GM AASHTO= A-1-a Remarks Entered by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/2008 F.M: 5.37 (no specification provided) o Sample Number: 070290 Depth: 2.7 feet Location: T1'-4 r _ — GeoResources, LLC Client: Pool Brothers Project: S. 312th Street c� Fife, WA Project No: Bernie Knoll F Tested By: Tim Bergstrom _ Checked By: Bernie Knoll Date: 2/4/2008 re 7 L F- N c M n 0 m 3 (D L E 0 L 3 0 c U m 0 a) Cn .N 5 X m m `o m a) CD a� L 100 90 BO 70 W 60 Z l_ Z 50 W U w 40 a 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution Report C C O 0 O C C 100 .. loll Y'Q 19 If �I IN HIM 1 I II 11 GRAIN SIZE _ mm. % +3" % Gravel % Sand Coarse Fine coarsell Medium Fine 0.0 25.1 39. 1 16,61 12.5 3.9 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC.* PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 2 100.0 1-1/2 95.8 1-1/4 93.9 1 81.8 3/4 74.9 1/2 65.1 3/8 54.9 #4 35.4 #10 18.8 #20 10.9 #40 6.3 #60 4.0 #100 3.0 #200 2.4 % Fines Silt 2.4 10 20 30 40 50 BO 70 BO 9Q 100 Material Description Well -Graded Gravel with Sand Sampled by Matt M. on 1/31/2008 Tested by Tim Bergstron on 2/4/2008 Atterber Limits PL= LLB P1= Coefficients D85= 26.8988 D60- 10.9788 D50= 8.1934 D30= 3.7490 D15= 1,4304 D10= 0.7491 Cu= 14.66 Cc= 1.71 Classification USCS= GW AASHTO= Remarks Entered by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/2008 F.M =5.88 (no specification provided) Sample Number: 070291 Depth: 3 feet Date: 2/4/2008 Location: TP-2 Client: Pool Brothers GeoResources, LLC Project: S. 312th Street Fife WA Pre ect No: Bernie Knoll Figure 8 Tested By: Tim Bergstrom Checked By: Bernie Knoll CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL Resubmittai DATE: TO: FROM: FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECTADDRES,S'.- ZONING DISTRICT. August 16, 2013 Ann Dower, Development Services Sarady Long, Traffic Matt Herrera — Planning 12-101554-00-UP None FW MISSION CHURCH PARKING LOT 405 S 312TH ST RS 7.2 PROJECTDESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct 190-stall approximately parking lot on parcel 082104 9057 that is located across South 312th from the Church. Formerly proposed plat of Maggie's Meadow. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT• Use Process IV, SEPA BK DESIGN BRIANKIM 1250355THPL MATERIALS SUBMn TED: 1. Response Letter 2. Corrected Sheets A101, S101, C101, 1,101, E101 3. Wellhead Checklist 4. Geotechnical Report CIT Federal Way DEPARTN-LEINTOF COMMUNru D�EVEr.vrnlENT SERVICES 33325 8`h AVenue South F�dcraT Way, WA 98003-6325 RESUBMITTED" 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 w► w.cilvotTcdci-ali\•ay.coni AUG 14 209 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS HAZARDOUS -MATERIALS INVENTORY STATEMENT ,CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AND WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS I. WHY SHOULD THIS INVENTORY STATEMENT BE FILLED OUT? Critical Aquifer Recharge,(CARAs) and Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) are considered "critical areas" pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWCC), Title 14, "Environmental Policy." This inventory statement must be filled out by the applicant or agent for any proposed activity listed in Section II of this handout, and which are located within Wellhead Capture Zones 1, 5, and 10 as §town on the Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas Maps. Please refer to the hlandout on Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas for a description of the review process. t I1. ACTIVITIES GOVERNED BY CARA AND WHPA REGULATIONS The inventory statemedt,must be filled out for the following activities: • Construction of any residential structure, including single-family development • Construction of any barn or other agricultural structure „ • Construction of any office, school, commercial, recreational, service, or storage building Construction of a Barking lot of any size ■ Other minor new dbnstruction (see WAC 197-11-800[2]) • Additions or modifEations to or replacement of any building or facility (does not include tenant improvemeWs) • Demolition of any,structure Any landfill or excavation '■ Installation of underground tanks • Any division of land, including short plats '• Change of use, which involves repair, remodeling, and maintenance activities Dredging " ! Reconstruction/maintenance of groins and similar shoreline protection structures • Replacement of uiility cables that must be buried under the surface of the bedlands • Repair/rebuilding'of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs • Installation or construction of any utility, except for on -going operation and maintenance activities of public wells by public water providers Personal wireless sftvice facilities Project Name F k5 . Mlkc;2n aur, % AMV. ViAL.b'Wpplicant By-' 0W% kzm Project Location _Ab e> S , ,_ LZ4'% �•'�. _ Tracking No. III. TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS'MATERIALS Please provide the approximate quantity of the types of hazardous materials or deleterious substances that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity. If no hazardous materials will be involved, please proceed to Section N. MATERIAL LIQUID allons SOLID(pounds) (1) Acid or basic solutions or solids (2) Antifreeze or coolants (3) Bleaches, peroxides, detergents, surfactants, disinfectants, bactericides, algaecides (4) Brake, transmission, hydraulic fluids (5) Brine solutions (6) Corrosion or rust prevention solutions (7) Cutting fluids (8) Deicing materials (9) Dry cleaning or cleaning solvents (10) Electroplating or metal finishing solutions Af (11) Engraving or etching solutions (12) Explosives (13) Fertilizers (14) Food or animal processing wastes (15) Formaldehyde (16) Fuels, additives, oils, greases (17) Glues, adhesives, or resins (18) Inks, printing, or photocopying chemicals (19) Laboratory chemicals, reagents or standards (20) Medical, hospital, pharmaceutical, dental, or veterinary fluids or wastes (21) Metals (hazardous e.g_ arsenic, copper, chromium, lead, mercury, silver, etc. (22) Paints, pigments, dyes, stains, varnish, sealers. (23) Pesticides, herbicides or poisons (24) Plastic resins, plasticizers, or catalysts (25) Photo development chemicals (26) Radioactive sources (27) Refrigerants, cooling water (contact) (28) Sludges, still bottoms (29) Solvents, thinners, paint removers or strippers (30) Tanning (leather) chemicals (3 1 ) Transformer, capacitor oils/fluids, PCB's (32) Waste oil (33) Wood preservatives (34) List OTHER hazardous materials or deleterious substances on a separate sheet_ Bulletin #056 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 3 k_\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement ti Project Name F. C. L►l� }.11n)IIcant f r_t o^A K jM Project Location 465 40L Tracking No. a4Gro46 -G*rVecF . IV. FURTHER INFORMATION Provide the approximate quantity of fill and source of fill to be imported to the site. I Annroximate Ouantitv of Imported Fill I Source of Fill ! Check box #1 if you do not plan to store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous material or deleterious substance listed in Section III. Check box(s) #2 through #5 (and fill in appropriate blanks) of the below table if they apply to your facility or activity. #1{J The proposed development will not store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous materials or deleterious substances listed above. 42 [ ] Above ground storage tanks, having a capacity of gallons will be installed. #3 [ ] Construction vehicles will be refueled on site. Storage within wholesale and retail facilities of hazardous materials, or other deleterious #4 [ ] substances, will be for sale in original containers with a capacity of gallons liquid or _pounds solid. The presence of chemical substances on this parcel is/will be for "temporary" non -routine #5 [ J maintenance or repair of the facility (such as paints and paint thinners) and are in individual containers with a capacity of _ gallons liquid or _mounds solid. Check any of the following items that currently exist or are proposed in connection with the development of the site. #1 Stormwater infiltration system (e.g., french drain, dry well, stormwater swale, etc.) #2 [ ] Hydraulic lifts or elevator, chemical systems, or other machinery that uses hazardous materials #3 [ J Cathodic protection wells #4 [ ] Water wells, monitoring wells, resource protection wells, piezometers #5 [ ] Leak detection devices, training for employees for use of hazardous materials, self-contained machinery, etc. SIGNATURE Signature r i anl� Im • Print Name Date Ifyou have any questions about filling out this application form, please call the Department of Community Development Services at 253-835-2607. Please be advised that an application for a development permit lacking the required information will not be accepted. Bulletin #056 --- January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Response to Correction Letter May 2, 2012 Brian Kim BK Design 36006 11 m Avenue SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Dear Matthew Herrera Following statement is the response of Correction Letter PUBLIC NOTICE The combined Notice of Application and optional DNS will be distributed within 14 days of this letter as follows: (1) one copy will be posted at each of the official notification boards; (2) one copy will be published in the Federal Way MtrTor, and (3) a copy will be mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. The department also has the responsibility to notify other agencies that may have jurisdiction over your development project or an interest in it. The applicant is responsible for posting a notification board prepared by the city. The notification board will be ready for pick up at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center will call area by 8:00am Friday, May 11, 2012. The board must be posted by Thursday, May 17, 2012. Please return the affidavit attached to the sign following installation. A notice of public hearing will be issued at least 14 days prior to the hearing date. A staff report with recommendation will be made available within seven days of the public hearing. Response of Correction Letter Notification board was pick up city and posted on the property. TECHNICAL COMMENTS Unless otherwise noted, the following comments provided by staff reviewing your project must be addressed prior to scheduling a public hearing for the proposal. Please direct questions regarding any of the technical comments to the appropriate staff representative. Zoning and Land Use Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com 1. Lot Coverage — FWRC 19.200.050 limits the amount of lot coverage for church uses at 75 percent of the subject property. The area of all structures, pavement, and any other impervious surface on the subject property will be calculated as a percentage of total lot area in determining compliance with maximum lot coverage. Please provide lot coverage totals on the site plan for the proposed parking area and existing church improvements across the street verifying compliance with the 75 percent threshold. Response of Correction Letter Lot Coverage: 70% RESUBMITTED Structure: 0 sf pavement (70%) is calculated on the site plan "A101". DEC 12 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 2. Boundary Discrepancy — King County Recorder's Office records detail a discrepancy with boundary locations on the northeast portion of the property. A Statutory Warranty Deed recorded November 18, 2010, contains a legal description with quiet title action resulting from King County Court Case #02- 2-19282-3KNT. A record of survey recorded May 13, 2005, details the altered property line. Please correct all sheets to show updated boundaries of the church property. Response of Correction Letter Boundary of northeast portion of the property is shown attached surveyor's sheet. 3. Pedestrian Connection — Five -foot -wide pedestrian walkways are proposed within the parking lot connecting to South 312m Street and existing church property across the street. FWRC 19.115.090(1)(i) requires six -foot -wide pedestrian walkways. Please correct all sheets to show six foot - wide pedestrian walkway. FWRC 19.15.050(4)(b) advises pedestrian walkways be delineated by separate paved routes using a variation in paved texture and color. Approved methods of delineation include: stone, brick, or granite pavers; exposed aggregate; or stamped and colored concrete. Paint striping on asphalt as a method of delineation is not encouraged. Please provide delineation method on site plan for parking lot and existing church property. Response of Correction Letter 6 ft wide colored pedestrian walkways are provided on the site plan "A101 ". 4. Wheel Stops — For unobstructed pedestrian travel along delineated walkways, please provide wheel stops on those parking stalls adjacent to pedestrian walkway. Response of Correction Letter Wheel Stops are provided on the site plan "A101 5. Accessible Parking Stalls — The increase of total parking stalls for the church will also require an increase in the number of accessible parking stalls. When total parking for a use is between 201 and 300 spaces, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires seven of those stalls be accessible. They must be located on the shortest accessible route of travel to an accessible building entrance. Please provide locations for the seven accessible stalls on the existing church parking area satisfying ADA requirements. Response of Correction Letter Total 7stalls (6+1 van stall) are provided on the site plan "A101" at near main church building. 6. Lighting — It cannot be confirmed the parking lot contains the recommended Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) minimum outdoor light levels as required by the city's CPTED policy. The IES recommends minimum average maintained footcandles of 1fc in parking areas. Please submit a photometric lighting plan that incorporates additional lighting standards to meet the minimum recommended levels (if needed) and detail drawings or photos of proposed lighting standards that are 20 feet in height or less and contain cut-off shields. Response of Correction Letter Lighting layout drawing and details specifications are provided on "E101" 7. Clearing and Grading — As shown on the civil sheets, proposed grading of the site will result in retaining walls at the rear of the property of up to 11 feet in height. FWRC 19.129.12Q(1) limits the height of walls in single-family residential zones to six feet measured from grade at base to top of wall. In order to maintain proposed elevations, staff suggests terracing in those areas needing wall heights in excess of six feet. Although this will result in less usable area, you may regain some or all of that area by redesigning the parking stall dimensions. Stalls are currently sized at loft. x 18ft. with 29ft. drive aisles. Design criteria allow standard stalls of 9ft. x 18ft. stalls with 25ft drive aisles. Additionally, up to 25 percent of the total number of stalls (proposed and existing) may be compact measuring 8ft. x 15ft. with 25.5ft. drive aisles. Please see the enclosed parking lot design criteria bulletin for more information. Terracing will require five-foot separation between walls with landscaping on the terrace. Rockeries and retaining walls must be composed of rock, brick, or other textured/patterned wall styles. Please be advised that due to the amount of proposed clearing on the site, the department will use authority granted in FWRC 19.129.966 to require a project timeline that demonstrates how site development work and re -vegetation of the site will be completed per approved re -vegetation and landscaping plans within 12 months of commencement of site work. Projects that will not be completed within 12 months of initial clearing, grading, and tree/ vegetation removal activity shall be required to submit plans for interim aesthetic treatment of the site. Phased clearing and grading and/or installation of portions of permanent landscaping as shown on approved plans are some methods the department may require to mitigate the impact of projects not completed within the 12-month timeline. Please provide corrections to the civil sheet that show a minimum of two cross sections of the site depicting the existing and proposed grade and proposed rockeries and/or retaining walls. Please depict height and wall composition. If terracing is utilized, please show appropriate landscaping within terraced sections on the landscaping sheet. Response of Correction Letter civil drawings are revised. 8. Landscaping Plan — Please include retaining walls within the perimeter landscaping screen. Plantings should be appropriately spaced on either side of walls and also provide an adequate screen of the walls for adjacent residences. Response of Correction Letter Landscape drawing is revised. 9. CPTED — The city's Community Design Guidelines include the implementation of Crime Prevention through Community Design (CPTED). These principles and performance standards are used during project development review to identify and incorporate design features that reduce opportunities for criminal activity to occur. Applicants are required to submit a completed CPTED checklist as a component of the site plan review application. It appears this CPTED information was inadvertently left out of the preapplication materials and the department apologizes for this oversight. Please complete applicable sections of the enclosed checklist that I have highlighted and return four copies with your resubmittal package. Response of Correction Letter CPTED application is fill out and submitted. 10. Wellhead Protection — The proposed parking lot property is within a five and ten year Wellhead Protection Zone. Please complete the enclosed checklist and submit four copies with your resubmittal package. Response of Correction Letter Wellhead Protection checklist is fill out and submitted. Stormwater and Engineering Ann Dower, 253-835-2732, ann.dower@cityoffederaiway_com Provide soils logs, soils infiltration tests, and the written opinion of a geotechnical engineer that soils are suitable for a functioning infiltration facility. A minimum of 3 feet of permeable soil below the bottom of the facility and a minimum of 3 feet between the bottom of the facility and maximum wet -season water table is required. Transportation Sarady Long, 253-835-2743, sarady.long@cityoffederalway.com Plan Review Comments 1. This property does not have the 660 feet minimum street frontage to allow a second access driveway onto South 312m Street. Please consolidate driveways and line up with 4m Avenue South to reduce conflict. Traffic staff would support allowing two driveways with a one-way in and one-way out traffic circulation if the westerly driveway can line up with 4mAvenue South. Response of Correction Letter Parking lot entry is moved to line up with 4mAvenue South. 2. The planned roadway for South 312m Street is a Type G, consisting of a 66-foot paved street with curb, six-foot planter with street trees, eight -foot sidewalk, and street lights all within 100-foot ROW. Assuming a symmetrical cross-section, an additional eight feet would be needed to accommodate this roadway section. Please set all improvements back eight feet from future right-of-way. Response of Correction Letter Site plan has been revised and comply. TMP Review and Pedestrian Comments 1. Staff concurs with the recommendations in the TMP report to install a mid -block pedestrian crosswalk with flashing lights on South 312m Street and a pedestrian pathway from the sidewalk to the church entrance for pedestrian safety. The pedestrian flasher shall be the Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon System by Spot Devices system (see enclosed Specs.). The exact location of the pedestrian flasher shall be reviewed and approved by the City and must be constructed to City standards. Response of Correction Letter Traffic Engineer revised and submit the report. 2. Verify intersection sight distance analysis on page 8 in meeting AASHTO standard/method. Per AASHTO intersection sight distance, the object height shall be 3.5 ft with 3.5 ft driver's eye height and 14.5 ft back from the edge of the traveled way for passenger vehicles. The sight distance triangle shall be depicted on the plan set. Response of Correction Letter Traffic Engineer revised and submit the report. Water/Sewer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District, 253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org As previously noted, because a new proposed driveway will conflict with an existing fire hydrant, a Facilities Installation Agreement will be required for Lakehaven to re -locate this hydrant. Applicant has not yet contacted Lakehaven regarding this FI Agr & the related hydrant re -location. Lakehaven continues to encourage owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes (as appropriate) separately to Lakehaven, early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. Response of Correction Letter I provided the site plan "All 01 ° to Lakehaven Utility District (LUD) and reconcile with them. It will be relocated the "Fire Hydrent" if LUD need. APPLICATION STATUS As of today, the 120-day review period has stopped with 4 days used. The review period will begin again within 14 days of a complete resubmittal of items requested/corrected. When resubmitting requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, two copies of corrected reports, six copies of corrected full size plans, and two copies of 11x17 plans with the enclosed resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The Federal Way Revised Code can be reviewed in its entirety at hftp://www.codepublishing.comNVA/FederalWay/ If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253- 835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Matthew Herrera Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form CPTED Checklist Parking Lot Design Criteria Wellhead Protection Checklist RFB Specifications IES Recommended Outdoor Footcandle Levels c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL Resu b mittal DATE: ro; FROM: FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS ZONING DISTRICT. - January 3, 2013 Ann Dower, Development Services Sarady Long, Traffic Matt Herrera - Planning 12-101554-00-UP None FW MISSION CHURCH PARKING LOT 405 S 312TH ST RS 7.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct 190-stall approximately parking lot on parcel 082104 9057 that is located across South 312th from the Church. Formerly proposed plat of Maggie's Meadow. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT. MATERMLS SUBMITTED: 1. Survey 2. Landscape plan 3. Civil Sheet 4. Architectural Sheet S. Photometric plan 6. TMP 7. TIA Process IV, SEPA BK DESIGN BRIAN KIM 36006 11TH AVE SW F— W J Q U U) 1 T=T 'sauas 009Z :pewsoIo4d dH 'Wd OZ:SZ:ZT ZTOZ/TT/ZT '6nnp•a:)ua}\lol 6upljed y:).jny:) LOOTU1b80bA\:M�, CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AND WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS Project: Federal Way Mission Church Parking Lot Addition Address: Across S 312th Street from 405 South 312th Street, Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel Number: 0821049057 ACTIVITIES GOVERNED BY REGULATIONS The following activities must comply with FWRC Title 19, Chapter 185, "Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas and Wellhead Protection Areas." • Construction of any residential structure, including single-family development Not Applicable • Construction of any barn or other agricultural structure Not Applicable • Construction of any office, school, commercial, recreational, service, or storage building Not Applicable • Construction of a parking lot of any size Property use as Church Additional Parking Lot • Other minor new construction (see WAC 197-11-800[21) Not Applicable • Additions or modifications to or replacement of any building or facility (does not include tenant i improvements ) Not Applicable • Demolition of any structure Not Applicable • Any landfill or excavation Existing Grade would modify accomdate to install parking lot • Installation of underground tanks Underground concrete detention vault will install. • Any division of land, including short plats Not Applicable • Change of use that involves repair, remodeling, and maintenance activities Not Applicable • Dredging Not Applicable • Reconstruction/maintenance of groins and similar shoreline protection structures Not Applicable • Replacement of utility cables that must be buried under the surface of the bedlands Not Applicable • Repair/rebuilding of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs Not Applicable �C I I P M IT'E D • Installation or construction of any utility, except for on -going operation and maintenance ti�s�f� public wells by public water providers We will comply DEC 12 2012 ■ Personal wireless service facilities Not Applicable CITY OF �L WAY CDS i Tenant improvement means any work, improvement or remodeling completely within the interior of a building necessary to meet the varied requirements of continuing or succeeding tenants. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES IN WELLHEAD CAPTURE ZONE 1 Land uses or activities for development that pose a significant hazard to the city's groundwater resources resulting from storing, handling, treating, using, producing, recycling, or disposing of hazardous materials or other deleterious substances shall be prohibited in Wellhead Capture Zone 1, except as specified in FWRC 19.30.170, "Special Provisions for Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas and Wellhead Protection Areas," and as described under Nonconforming Uses in this bulletin. Prohibited land uses and activities include, but are not limited to: a. On -site community sewage disposal systems as defined in Chapter 248-272, WAC b. Hazardous liquid pipelines as defined in Chapter 81.88, RCW c. Solid waste landfills d. Solid waste transfer stations e. Liquid petroleum refining, reprocessing, and storage f. The storage or distribution of gasoline treated with the additive MTBE g. Hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (except those defined under permit by rule for industrial wastewater treatment processes per WAC Chapter 173-303802[51[c]) h. Chemical manufacturing, including but not limited to, organic and inorganic chemicals, plastics and resins, pharmaceuticals, cleaning compounds, paints and lacquers, and agricultural chemicals i. Dry cleaning establishments using the solvent perchloroethylene j. Primary and secondary metal industries that manufacture, produce, smelt, or refine ferrous and non-ferrous metals from molten materials k. Wood treatment facilities, including wood preserving and wood products preserving 1. Mobile fleet fueling operations m. Mining (metal, sand, and gravel) n. Other land uses and activities that the city determines would pose a significant groundwater hazard to the city's groundwater supply NONCONCONFORMING USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY In accordance with FWRC 19.30.170, "Special Provisions for Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas and Wellhead Protection Areas," a nonconformance must be corrected to comply with FWRC Title 19, Chapter 185. A nonconformance can relate either to the use of the property or the whether the use conforms to all development standards of FWRC Title 19. Nonconforming Uses A nonconforming use for the purpose of wellhead and critical aquifer protection is any use listed in FWRC 19.185.040 (numbers a-n, above). These uses are prohibited only in Wellhead Protection Zone 1. Pursuant to FWRC 19.30.080, any nonconforming use must be terminated if: z 1) The applicant is making structural alterations or increasing the gross floor area of the structure that houses or supports the nonconforming use. There is no structure on site. z Structural alterations mean any change in the supporting member of a building or structure. 2) The applicant is making changes or alterations, or doing work other than normal maintenance, in any one consecutive 12-month period to any structure that houses or supports the nonconforming use, and the fair market value of that change, alteration, or work exceeds 15 percent of the assessed or appraised value of that structure. The applicant may provide an appraisal of the structure on the subject property. We will comply. 3) The subject property has been abandoned. Site is used for additional Church Parking Lot; mostly use during weekends and special event. Nonconforming Development A nonconforming development is an allowable use, based on the Use Zone Charts, which does not meet the performance standards of FWRC 19.185.060 related to wellhead protection and critical aquifer recharge areas. Regardless of the thresholds in FWRC 19.30.090, any nonconforming development, which triggers SEPA review, must be brought into compliance with the performance standards specified in FWRC 19.185.060. PROCESS FOR REVIEW 1 Any development activity or division of land which requires review under FWRC Title 14, "Environmental Policy," and which is located within a designated Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Area, shall submit a Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement with a permit application. On -going operation and maintenance activities of public wells by public water providers are exempt from these requirements. Not Applicable 2 If hazardous materials are involved, a SEPA checklist must be filled out. (A determination as to whether hazardous materials will be used, stored, transported, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity will normally be made at the preapplication stage.) Not Applicable/ No hazardous materials are involved 3 The Development Review Committee will review the Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement along with the permit application, to determine whether hazardous materials meeting the definition of FWRC 5 19.05.005 will be used, stored, transported, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity. Not Applicable 4 The Development Review Committee shall make the following determination: a) No hazardous materials are involved. b) Hazardous materials are involved; however, existing laws or regulations adequately mitigate any potential impact, and documentation is provided to demonstrate compliance. (Refer to list of activities and state regulation that apply to them in this bulletin.) c) Hazardous materials are involved and the proposal has the potential to significantly impact Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas; however, sufficient information is not available to evaluate the potential impact of contamination. The city may require a Hydrogeologic Critical Area Assessment Report to be prepared by a qualified groundwater scientist in order to determine the potential impacts of contamination on the aquifer. Normal maintenance includes interior and exterior repairs and incidental alterations. Normal maintenance and repair includes, but is not limited to, painting, roof repair and replacement, plumbing, wiring and electrical systems, mechanical equipment replacement and weatherization. Incidental alterations may include construction of nonbearing walls or partitions. Abandoned means knowing relinquishment, by the owner, of right or claim to the subject property or structure on that property, without any intention of transferring rights to the property or structure to another owner, tenant, or lessee, or of resuming the owner's use of the property. 5 "Abandoned" shall include but not be limited to circumstances involving tax forfeiture, bankruptcy, or mortgage foreclosure. Hazardous materials" mean any material, either singularly or in combination, that is a physical or health hazard as defined and classified in the International Fire Code, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition; any material that may degrade groundwater quality when improperly stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, disposed of, or otherwise mismanaged; any hazardous waste, hazardous substance, dangerous waste, or extremely hazardous waste that is a physical or health hazard as defined or classified in Chapter 70.105 RCW and Chapter 173-303 WAC, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition; and petroleum or petroleum products that are in a liquid phase at ambient temperatures, including any waste oils or sludge. STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS ACTIVITY Above Ground Storage Tanks Animal Feedlots Automobile Washers Below Ground Storage Tanks Chemical Treatment Storage and Disposal Facilities Hazardous Waste Generators (boat repair shops, biological research facility, dry cleaners, furniture stripping, motor vehicle service garages, photographic processing, rintiniz and Dublishin shops, etc. STATUE — REGULATION — GUIDANCE Chapter 173-303-640 WAC ChWer 173-216 WAC, Ch ter 173-220 WAC Chapter 173-216 WAC, Best Management Practices for Vehicle and Equipment Discharges (WDOE WQ-R 95-' Chapter 173-360 WAC Chapter 173-303-182 WAC Chapter 173-303 WAC Injection Wells Federal 40 CFR Parts 144 and 146, Chapter 173-218 WAC Junk Yards and Salvage Yards Chapter 173-304 WAC, Best Management Practices to Prevent Stormwater Pollution at Vehicles Recycler Facilities (WDOE 94-146 Oil and Gas Drillin Chapter 332-12-450 WAC, WAC, Cha ter 173-218 WAC On -Site Sewage Systems (large scale) Chapter 173-240 WAC On -Site Sewage Systems <14,500 gal/&y Cha ter 246-272 WAC, Local Health Ordinances Pesticide §!22ge and Use Chapter 15.54 RCW, Chapter 17.21 RCW Sawmills Chapter 173-303 WAC, 173-304 WAC, Best Management Practices to Prevent Stormwater Pollution at Log Yards (WOE 95-53) Solid Waste Handling and Recycling Chapter 173-304 WAC Facilities Surface Mining Chapter 332-18-015 WAC Waste Water Application to Land Surface Chapter 173-216 WAC, Chapter 173-200 WAC, WDOE Land Application Guidelines, Best Management Practices for Applicants for uses listed below will be required to provide documentation of compliance with state and/or federal standards and regulations. Statues, Regulations, and Guidance Pertaining to Groundwater Impacting Activities QUESTIONS? Additional questions about Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection may be directed to the Federal th Way Department of Community Development Services (253-835-2607), 33325 8 Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325. This handout cannot be used as a substitute for codes and regulations. Every project should be reviewed for specific compliance with the City of Federal Way codes and regulations. CITY OF :mod Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF CommuNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 983-6325 RESUBMITTED 253- 35 2607; Fax253-835-2609 www.cilyoffederalway.com DEC 12 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (OPTED) Checklist Directions Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by City Staff, and will be integrated into the Site Plan and/or Building Permit review process. Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review 6 Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance 1.1 Blind Corners —conforms Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. Revise Lower landscape plants are used to maximize to !NA avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lot Comments: ® Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should be permeable (see through) including landscaping, fencing etc. ■ 13 Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around comers. e Other strategy n 1.2 Site and Building Layout —Conforms Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the —Revise use to the street, and between uses _NA Open to street side maximize natural Comments: observation. Bulletin #022 - January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review 6 Applicable dining Building Permit Review ❑ Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on For Non -Single corners. ■ Family Development © Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the dwelling. ■ Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/ retail development should not be from the rear of the building. 1 ❑ Offset windows, doorways and balconies to allow for natural observation while protecting privacy. ■ ❑ Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view of the street. ■ For Commercial/ Retail/ Industrial If employee entrances must be separated from the main and Community ❑ entrance, they should maximize opportunities for natural Facilities surveillance from the street. ■ ❑ In industrial developments, administration/offices should be located at the front of the building. ■ Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses of For Surface ❑ parking are proposed, provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ Parking Structures 13 Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. ■ ® Avoid hidden recesses. ■ ❑ Locate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. 0 Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people. Parks, plazas, Open Space ❑ common areas, and playgrounds should be placed in the front Areas of buildings. Shopping centers and other similar uses should face streets. ■ Other strategy used: Evaluation for Agency Use Only Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 9 kAHandouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy 11 Applicable dining Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Penmit Review 1.3 CommonlOpen Space Areas and Public On -Site Open —Conforms Space Revise Provide natural surveillance for commonlopen space areas. NA Comments: n/a Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent ❑ to main common/open space areas, e.g. playgrounds, swimming pools, etc., and public on -site open space. ■ Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which ❑ screens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. ■ Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells ❑ close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the building entry. 6 ❑ Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy used: 1.4 Entrances Conforms Provide entries that are clearly visible. Revise _NA Signages are provided Continents: © Design entrances to allow users to see into them before entering. t Entrances should be clearly identified (Signs must conform to ® FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. (Applicable during Certificate of Occupgtrcy Inspection). Other strategy used: Signaae is posted at entranc and clearly visible from street. 1.5 Fencing —Conforms Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: wood Fence is provide grade changed less than 6'-0". Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPT'ED Checklist Section and Y ✓—Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review 6 Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g. Evaluation for Agency Use Only pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. 6 Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ❑ open elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. e If noise insulation is required, install double -glazing at the ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. e Other strategy used: . 13 1.6 Landscaping _Conforms Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and —Revise allows intruders to hide. _NA Comments: Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. ■ Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and along pedestrian pathways. ■ ❑ Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. ■ Other strategy used. Terraced concrete retaining ® walls height total 11'-0" will exposed hiding area in 1.7 Exterior Lighting —Conforms Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. _Revise (Refer to FWRC 19.115.050(7)(a) for specific lighting _NA requirements.) Comments: Photometric drawing is provided Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with IDuminating Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which © addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Bulletin #022 -January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable dwing Site Plan Review A Applicable during Building Permit Review Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a ® coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. ■ For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that lighting ® supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal - resistant. e Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access/egress routes, and signage is welllit. e ❑ In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and ® mature form, as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light. e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid ® giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e Select and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. ■ Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people ❑ (retirenwnt homes, congregate care facilities, senior and/ or community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in public/common areas. e Other strategy u 1.8 Mix of Uses In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural surveillance, while protecting privacy. Confor —ms Revise __NA Comments: Bulletin #►022 —January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable Ju r iii:,• Site Plan Review 9 Applicable during Building Permit Review Where allowed by city code, locate shops and businesses on lower floors and residences on upper floors. In this way, ❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the residences can be observed by the businesses during business hours. ■ ❑ Include food kiosks, restaurants, etc. within parks and parking structures. ■ Other strategy: used 1.9 Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors Conforms When used and permitted by building and fire codes, security —Revise bars, shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street —NA and be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Comments: ❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable (see -through). e Other strategy used: Security metal swing _gates © are provided to limit access during night Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification _Conforms Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to _Revise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find NA the building. Identification signs must conform to FWRC Comments: 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. n/a - No building ❑ Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. e Bulletin #022 -January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 9 Uliandouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard 2.2 Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review In residential uses, each individual unit should be clearly numbered. In multiple building complexes, each building entry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry. In addition, unit numbers should be provided on each level or floor. e ❑ Street numbers should be made of durable materials, preferably reflective or luminous, and unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). e For larger projects, provide location maps (fixed plaque ❑ format) and directional signage at public entry points and along internal public routes of travel. e U Other strategy Entrances Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. Clear visible signages are provided Entrances should be easily recognizable through design ® features and directional signage. (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ■ ❑ Minimize the number of entry points. ■ —Conforms _Revise _NA Comments: Other strategy used: 2.3 Landscaping _Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access. —Revise _NA Terraced concrete retaining planting areas Comments: protect property. ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e Other strategy used: FRI 2.4 Landscaping Location Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a building or to neighboring buildings. All landscape area is accessible. Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 9 Conforms —Revise __NA Comrnenis: k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures, ❑ fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. ■ Other strategy used: 2.5 Security —Conforms Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access _ _Revise _NA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures ❑ to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable during Certi rcate of Occu anc has ection). Other strategy used: Metal swing gates at each access are ® provided on the drawing 2.6 Signage _Conforms Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple to _Revise understand [Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt —NA Signs]. Comments: Signages are provided each access. ® Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graphics for informational signs. e Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and For Surface ❑ drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators, and exits. e Parking Structures In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish ❑ between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system. e Cl Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. e Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy 0 Applicable during Site Plan Review 9 Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used: Parking lot is mostly used © Wiring weekends and church_speci event. Section 3.0 Ownership 3.1 Maintenance —Conforms Create a "cared for" image Revise _ NA Church maintenance person will care everyday. Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWRC ® 19.125.090, in order to give an impression of ownership, care, and security. (Ongoing). Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no ❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance. i Other strategy used: 3.2 Materials —Conforms Use materials, which reduce the opportunity for vandalism Revise NA Comments: Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel ❑ materials, anti -graffiti paints, and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. 6 ❑ Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWRC 19.125.040(21) regarding the use of vegetative screens. 6 Common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points, or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: Concrete, color brick, metal ®gates are commonly used. Bulletin t1022 -January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist s P t §9 �o Y� S �i It v s�rr i 1 I -------------- ------------- J3� e A4 7 IN OAF 1__ - ` - '--- HOLDER -----•--- van• I � 1n > _ 0 � � I ✓ 4 00 1 D�A� MISSION CHURCH PARKING LOT EXPANSION STAMP O y z 405 South 3121h Shee[ Federal Way, WA 98003 Q o 1Z: 1 ti z Owner Federl Way Mission Chuch v �? r 9800E Ilfh Ave 9f %-IfAO: aYLI.'ZWGh%6vG1WLMM R. o DESIGN —F d-. •A,. Weehla%1— NOW Ph—.: (259)=-1032 ca. c2E9>992-3e25 =I+uu ■ ■ ■ 9 S Y Y '. x i a .i i a 0 fitf@ { R i x •! p It x Y• Y r, T 7 T - X law 1; Nan— tt +ga74 a j: � 1i r 1 !Y •-��I• I i , ssm MISSION CHURCH °�"` - AL 33D'2 Z Z s4err i(1/5, vm cw Li PARKING LOT EXPANSION Y €a s $ 5.2.12 COM41U rs 12A.12 $X 405 South 312th Street Federal Way, WA 98003o+,E: Owner. Federal Way Mmon Church x 'g 12.4.72 WU• IaM LIG1'iNG Type: Job: Catalog number: Round Aluminum Non -Tapered Pole revision 5/25/12 • pra.pdf Pole Mounting Structural Luminiare Finish Optional Hinged Optional Duplex Option Base Receptacle See page 2 L See page 3 See page 4 Specifications Conduit Opening Presswood Template Base Cover Plan View a o 450 4 I 0 0 Longitudinal reference line. \\/ Bolt Circle Orient parallel Diameter to curb or walkway. Leveling Nut r Base Cover and Washer / Anchor Bolt Projection Post Top Mounting H I I u rr Base Detail Grout must be packed ' under pole base to insure full contact with footing Concrete and prevent loosening of footing to be leveling nuts. designed by Provide a channel through others. the grout for drainage from the pole interior. ED' HUBBELL nGHnNG.INC Side Arm Mounting Y See chart on page 2 Handhole Base Cover Approvals: Date: Page: 1 of 5 Pole Construction: Seamless round extruded aluminum tube of alloy 6063 T6, welded 0 top and bottom of aluminum base casting of allay 356. Base Cover: Base has a two-piece cast aluminum full cover of 319 alloy, secured by stainless steel screws. Pole Cap- A flush -sided cast aluminum pole cap is provided for side arm mounted luminaires. Handhole: W up from base, with a gasketed cover and ground lug. Poles with a 3-/s O.D. include a handhole reinforcement casting welded in place. Anchor Bolts: Four galvanized anchor bolts provided, complete with eight nuts, eight flat washers, and a presswood template. Vibration Dampener. All poles 25' and above include an internally mounted, Factory installed pendulum vibration dampener, with flush stainless steel socket head fasteners finished to match pole. Strength: Poles will withstand wind loads as Listed in chart (See page 2) when luminaires are mounted per fixture installation instructions. Finish: Super TGIC thermasa polyester powder coat paint applied over a titanated zirconium conversion coating. Standard colors are Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, Stealth Gray"A, Platinum Silver, and White. Custom colors are available. CAUTION; Installation of les without luminaires) will compromise pole strength. Any accessories attached to pole, or other modifications will compromise pole strength and may result in pole failure. Maintenance: A regularly scheduled maintenance program must be established to insure the protective paint coating is intact, corrosion or structural damage has not occurred, and anchor) l �¢4do so Ocould lead tD sonal injury. DEC 12 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS © 2012 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5604012146 �OL ION LJGiTNG PRA Round Aluminum Non -Tapered Pole revision 5/25/12 • pra.pdf Type; Job: Page: 2 of 5 NOTE: All allowable pole and fixture EPA5 are derived from the AASHTO standard. Standard Featu reS Responsibility lies with the specifier for correctpole selection based on local codes and standards for the job location. (See page 4). X Y Handhole Base Cover 18' Pole Pole Catalog X Number ❑ PRA8-4125 8' ❑ PRA8-5125 8' ❑ PRA1034125 10' ❑ PRA10-4125 10' ❑ PRA10-5125 10' ❑ PRA1234188 12' ❑ PRA12-4125 12' ❑ PRA12-5125 12' ❑ PRA12-6188 12' ❑ PRA1434188 14' ❑ PRA14-4125 14' ❑ PRA14-4188 14' ❑ PRA14-5125 14' ❑ PRA14-5188 14' ❑ PRA14-6188 14' ❑ PRA16.4188 16' ❑ PRA16-5125 16' ❑ PRA16-5188 16' ❑ PRA16.6188 16' ❑ PRA20-4188 19.5' ❑ PRA20-5125 19.5' ❑ PRA20-5188 19.5' ❑ PRA20-6188 19.5' ❑ PRA25-6188 25' ❑ PRA30-6188 30' ❑ PRA30-6250 30' Allowable Pole EPA Y 85 90 100 110 120 4" x .125 13.06 11.49 10.46 8.39 6.81 5" x .125 2129 18.79 17.15 14.05 11.72 33/s' x .125 6.58 5.70 7.71 6.05 4.79 4" x .125 9.78 8.53 9.09 7.01 5.42 5' x .125 16.21 14.21 12.90 10.51 8.72 33/8' x .188 8.76 7.62 6.86 5.35 420 4' x .125 7.48 6.44 5.75 4.37 3.32 5' x .125 12.67 11.00 9.91 8.01 6.60 6" x .188 32.89 29.22 27.04 22.20 18.53 33/3" x .188 6.94 5.95 5.31 4.01 3.02 4" x .125 5.73 4.84 4.25 3.06 2.16 4" x .188 10.56 9,14 821 6.34 4.92 5' x .125 10.01 8.58 7.64 6.10 4.98 5" x .188 17.90 15.62 14.12 11.46 9A8 6" x .188 27.19 24.11 22.37 18.31 15.24 4' x .188 8.55 7.31 6.50 4.86 3.62 5" x .125 7.90 6.65 5.83 4.57 3.67 5' x .188 14.80 12.81 11.50 9.26 7.61 6' x .188 22.77 20.16 18.75 15.29 12.69 4" x .188 5.33 4.37 3.74 2.48 1.52 5" x .125 4.50 3.54 2.90 2.11 1.56 5" x .188 9.83 8.29 7.28 5.73 4.60 6" x .188 15.69 13.81 12.95 10.46 8.59 6' x .188 9.74 8.46 8.07 6.38 5.12 6" x .188 5.61 4.74 4.69 3.54 2.71 6' x .250 11.37 9.88 9.42 7.45 5.99 Wind Map Steady Wind 130 140 150 5.65 4.80 4.13 9.92 8.49 7.34 3.88 327 2.78 4.30 3.58 3.01 7.34 6.25 5.38 3.30 2.59 2.03 2.59 2.14 1.78 5.51 4.66 3.99 15.69 13.44 11.64 2.26 1.65 1.17 1.57 1.24 0.98 3.91 3.26 2.74 4.11 3.44 2.91 7.95 6.75 5.79 12.87 11.00 9.49 2.76 225 1.85 2.98 2.45 2.03 6.34 5.34 4.55 10.68 9.09 7.82 0.91 0.63 0.42 1.16 0.85 0.62 3.75 3.09 2.56 7.16 6.03 5.14 4.17 3.43 2.85 2.08 1.60 1.23 4.88 4.02 3.34 © 2012 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5604012146 �t,L 1aM tGinrG Type: PM Round Aluminum Non -Tapered Pole revision 5/25/12 a pra.pdf Job: Page: 3 of 5 NOTE: All allowable pole and fixture EPAs are derived from the AASHTO standard. Standard Features Responsibility lieswith thespecifier forcarrectpole selection based on local codes and standards for the job location. (See page 4). Anchor Base and Bolt Detail Bolt Anchor Anchor Pole Pole Circle Bolt Bolts Base Cover Conduit Height Diameter Dia. Projection Size Size �OPWIlIng 8'-14' 4"-5" 81/2" 31/4" 3/4" x 30" + 4" 11 W, 3" dia. 10'-14' 331d' 7" 31/a" 3/4" x 15" + 3" 11 %a" 21/2' dia. X 12' 6" 101/2" 33/a' 3/4" x 30" + 3" 11 %a° 3" dia. 14' 6" 101/2" 31/4" 3/4" x 30" + 4" 11 %8" 3" dia. 16-20' 4"-5" 81/2 31/4" 3/4" x 30" + 4" 11 W 3" dia. 25L30' 6" 101/2 33/8" 3/4" x 30" + 4" 14" 5" dia. -Y r Handhole Base Cover 8' Mounting Flush Side Arm Mount Plan Views: 0�., �..i Mounting': ❑FM ❑A❑SA ❑B❑SB ❑L❑SL ❑T❑ST ❑Y❑SY ❑C❑SC NOTE: Allowable Pole EPA for jobsite wind conditions must be equal to or greater than fixture mount EPA. Please refer to Kim luminaire catalog for specific fixture. 'See luminaire drilling requirements in luminaire catalog. Structural Luminaires Only- Examples ❑ TS:Single Tension for small and large Structural - PRA20-5188SB-TS ❑ TD:Double Tension for small and large Structural - PRA20-5188B-TD ❑ TR:Truss for small and large Structural - PRA20-5188SB-TR ❑ XTS:Single Tension for 1 OOOW Structural - PRA20-5188B-XTS ❑ XTD:Double Tension for 1000W Structural - PRA20-5188B-XTD ❑ XTR:Truss for 1 OOOW Structural - PRA20-5188B-XTR 0 2012 KIM LIGHTING • PO. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5604012146 �tk IaM L.IGHiNG Type: Job: Standard and Optional Features Finish Super TGIC powder coat paint over a titanated zirconium conversion coating. Optional Hinged Base Cat. No. ❑ HB-X1 ❑ HB-X2 ❑HBY1 ❑HBY2 ❑ No Option Optional Duplex Receptacle Cat No. ❑ DR ❑ DR-GFI ❑ No Option PRA Round Aluminum Non -Tapered Pole revision 5/25/12 • pra.pdf Page: 4 of 5 Color: Blade Dark Bronze Light Gray Stealth GrayTm Platinum Silver White Custom Color' Cat No.: ❑ BL ❑ DB ❑ LG ❑ SG ❑ PS ❑ WH ❑ CC 'Custom color subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. Consult representative. Custom color description: Optional hinged base available for FM, A, and B mount poles up to 14 feet only. the use of hinged bases requires some pre -planning so poles hinge in the right direction, as dictated by the surrounding environment. NOTE: For FM mount, use HB-X1 base. X1 t Y1 Y2 A mount Hinging X2 Directions X1 t Y1 " —►Y2 B mount X2 Mounted opposite the hindhole, at 22'/V from base of Ingle, in a cast aluminum box that is internally welded and sealed with a gasketed self -closing cover and locking bracket. Duplex Receptacle (DR) rated 20A., 125V. Duplex Receptacle with Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (DR-GFI) rated 20A., 125V. © 2012 KIM LIGHTING - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 - TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5604012146 irz 91 fV _ - ■ � F � - 1 �■Yi i - r PRA Round Aluminum Non -Tapered Pole ■aM LG+HNG revision 5/25/12 • pra.pdf Type: Job: Page: 5 of 5 i� 0 120 85 a 130 ,30 Wind Map 90 90 United States and Canada To obtain more information on AASHTO Standards for Lighting Equipment contact: 140 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials: 444 N. Capitol Street, NW, Suite 249 150 140 Washington, DC 20001 140 (202) 624-5800 Wind Region www.aashto.org `Special (Consult Local Authorities) 90 k140 Too 130 150 110120 NOTES: ■ Values are based on 50 year mean recurrence interval 30' above grade. • Hawaii has an 105 mph wind velocity. • Puerto Rico has a 125 mph wind velocity. • Caution must be exercised in determining wind velocities in special wind areas such as: Mountainous Regions Areas surrounding the Great Lakes or other large bodies of water or open land. Areas subject to extreme wind conditions, such as hurricanes, typhoons, cyclones, and tornadoes. Areas adjacent to airports. Any specific area with a known or suspected abnormally high intermittent wind condition caused by geography, adjacent structures, or other specific local conditions that may not be recorded in National Weather Service records. • Allowable pole EPA for jobsite wind conditions must be equal to or greater than fixture EPA. Responsibility lies with the specifier for correct pole selection based on AASHTO wind map and job location. *The Wind Map is intended only as a general guide. Always consult local authorities to determine maximum wind velocities, gusting and unique wind conditions for each specific application. • CAUTION: Wind speeds and listed EPAs are for ground mounted installations. Poles mounted on structures (such as bridges, and buildings) must consider vibration and coefficient of height factors beyond this general guide. Consult AASHTO standards. + Extreme Wind Events: Hurricanes, Typhoons, Cyclones, or Tornadoes expose poles to flying debris, wind shear, and Other unpredictable aerodynamic forces not indicated by the wind velocity ratings. ■ Pole Strength Limited Warranty: Standard, unmodified Kim lighting Poles installed as recommended, undamaged b corrosion, or lack of maintenance, shall withstand steady wind conditions as provided on page 2 (Allowable Pole EPA). Installation of poles without luminaires, or attachment of any unauthorized accessories to poles shall void this warranty. © 2012 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 5604012146 It IaM Llcdil'.iG Type: Job: Catalog number: Mtg. Fixture Electrical Module Finish Options I - Seepage 2 I See pages 3-4 Ordering Example:1SA/ALT3P35/60L5K277/WH1A26 Select pole from Kim's Amu and Poles Selection Guide. If pole is provided by others indicate O.D. for arm fitting. Specifications ALT60 Approx. Wt. = 27 Ibs. _T(59M) (1B7 rui a, z (51 rvnl 17• ( (432�) s,wcu Atlepl9r TOP BOTTOM SIDE a nW 3W FRONT (9B mm) ED Patents Pending HUBBELL nGHnNEi INC. ALT60 ALTITUDE' LED 5/14/12 • kl_aIt60 spec.pdf Approvals: Date: Page: 1 of 5 Housing: One piece, low capper, aluminum extrusion is mechanically secured with stainless steel fasteners to low capper aluminum die-cast electrical compartment and end cap. The electrical compartment includes an integral support arm for mounting directly to a surface mount pole adaptor or a horizontal slipfitter. A solid barrier wall separates the optical and electrical compartment for thermal control. Electrical compartment and end cap covers are securely fastened with with two hinges and a single latch at each cover. One piece silicone gaskets seal the compartments at the barrier surface. Optical Module: The high performance optic utilizes the IP66 rated PicoPrism`" technology securely attached to internal heat sink modules producing incredible uniformity and visual comforL This PicoPrism optic utilizes a canted prism lens aimed toward the task and spreads horizontally to produce high lumen output as well as great uniformity. All the optical modules are fastened to the body of the fuminaire across the center as well as around the perimeter. Electrical Compartment: input voltage is 120 throwgh 277V 0 50/6OHz.Class 2 output with power factor >0.9 at full load in accordance with the National Electrical Code, ANSI/NFPA 70. Integral 10kV surge suppression protection standard. To address inrush current, slow blow fuse or type C/D breaker should be used. All electronic components are UL and CSA recognized and mounted directly to a driver tray for maximum heat dissipation and modularity. Driver is rated for -st0°C starting and has a 0-10V dimming interface for multi -level illumination options. All electronic components are IP66 rated. Support Arm: Die-cast, low copper aluminum with splice access cover and tool -less entry. A die-cast pole adaptor and an internal reinforcing plate are provided with wire strain relief. Arm adaptor is circular cut for specified round pole_ For field wire connections, a terminal block is mounted in the arm cavity and accessible behind the splice access cover. Accepts #14 to #8 wire sizes and is factory prewired to electrical module quick -disconnect plug inside the electrical compartment Optional Horizontal Slip -fitter: Cast low copper aluminum with stamped splice access cover. A die-cast adaptor plate is provided to secure the luminaire to 1-1/4" to 2" IPS pipe size arms. For field wire connections, a terminal block is mounted in the arm cavity and accessible behind the splice access cover. Accepts 914 to 48 wire sizes and is factory prewired to electrical module quick -disconnect plug inside the electrical compartment. Optional Wall Mount The Altitude easily mounts to the wall. A cast aluminum wall bracket is attached to the wall over the junction box. Bolt the Speed Mount to the cover plate. Then install the assembly over the wail mount bracket. Slide the luminaire into place for hands fine wiring and finishing. Finish: Each luminaire receives a fade and abrasion resistant, electrostatically applied, thermally cured, triglycidal iso nurate (TGIQ ppolyester powdercoat finish. Standard colors include (0L) Black, (DB) 17ark Bronze (WH) White, (P5) Platinum Silver, (SG) Stealth Gray, (LG) Light Gray, and [CC) Custom Color (Include RAL#). Listed to: UL 1598 Standard for Luminaires - UL 8750 Standard for Safety for Light Emitting Diode (LED) Equi rnent for use in Lighting Products and CSA C22.2#250.0 Luminaires. RoHS compliant Meets Buy American requirements within ARRA CAUTION: Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state and/or local electrical codes, Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. KIM LIGHTING RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE. 0 2012 KIM LIGNTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0OBO • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 It IaM uC,HTtrc Type: Job: Mounting 3SY configuration is available for round poles only. Fixture Cat. No. designates fixture and light distribution. Electrical Module ALT60 ALTITUDE' LED 5/14/12 • kl_aIt60_spec.pdf Page: 2 of 5 Standard Features Cat. No.: Ell SA ❑ 2SB ❑ 2SL ❑ 3ST ❑ 3SY ❑ 4SC ❑ 1SW EPA (Effective Projected Area) ALT60 0.58 1.17 0.91 1.50 1.50 1.66 n/a ALT x P X Fnicaprism'" :A 7 AlMtxie Distribution: Milliamps: ❑ 1 = Type I ❑ 4 = Type IV 35 = 350 mA ❑ 2 = Type II ❑ 4NFO = Type IV-NFO 70 = 700 mA ❑ 3 = Type III ❑ 5 = Type V ❑ 3NFO = Type III-NFO ❑ R = Type R Right ❑ L = Type L Left Light Distribution: l TYPE I TYPE 11 TYPEIII TYPEIII-NFO TYPEIV TYPEIV-NFO TYPEV TYPE R TYPE L Forward Square Right Left Throw 60L F60717W x 231/21 x Color Temperature:' ❑ 580nm = Amber' ❑ 4K = 4000K ❑ 5K = 5000K I For custom optics and color temperature configurations, contact factory. 2Turtle Friendly. 3347V & 480V may include step-down transformer x Voltage: ❑ 120 =120V ❑ 208 = 208V ❑ 240 = 240V ❑ 277 = 277V ❑ 347 = 347V ❑ 480 = 480V3 DEC 12 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL. WAY CDS 0 2012 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 It IaM LJGM'NG Type: Job: Optional Features ALT60 ALTITUDE' LED 5/14/12 • kl_alt60_spec.pdf Page: 3 of 5 Finish Color Black Dark Bronze Stealth Gray Platinum Silver White Custom Color' TGIC powder coat. Cat. No.: ❑ BL ❑ DB ❑ SG ❑ PS ❑ WH ❑ CC Wall Mounting Cat. No. 1 SW Select from Mounting on page 2. Fusing (internal only): Cat. No. (see chart at right) ❑ No Option Photocell Receptacle Cat No. ❑ A26 ❑ No Option Lenses Cat. No. ❑ FGL (Glass) ❑ FPL (Polycarbonate) ❑ No Option Neighbor Friendly Optic: Cat. No. ❑ NFO ❑ No Option 'Custom colors subject to additional charges, minimum quantities and extended lead times. Consult representatrve. Custom color description: The Altitude- easily mounts to the wall. A cast aluminum wall bracket is attached to the wall over the junction box. Bolt the Speed Mount to the cover plate. Then install the assembly over the wall mount bracket. Side the luminaire into place for hands free wiring and finishing. Cover Plate I 6%' x 111/2' Speed 11 h' Mount R87 mm) Adapter Splice Access Cover 1laommst 10Wtrro�mas Mounting Plate rra-1v High temperature fuse holders factory installed inside the fixture housing. Fuse is included. Line Volts: 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V Cat. No.: ❑ SF ❑ DF ❑ DF ❑ SF ❑ SF ❑ DF Rotatable photocell receptacle provided for NEMA base photocell (by others). �r Receptacle One-piece flat glass or polycarbonate lens slips into reveal. Extra silicone gasketing will be provided to retain a clear = optical compartment. (Only available For 350mA systems). -� CAUTION: Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. Polycarbonate Lens Integrated Neighbor Friendly Optic on each PicoPrism� module to completely control unwanted backlight. Most effective with Type III and IV distibutions. gn 6B TYPE III-NFO TYPE IV-NFO 0 2012 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/369-2695 ALT60 IaNI LIGH1'NG Type: Job: Optional Features ALTITUDE' LED 5/14/12 • kl_alt60_spec.pdf Page: 4 of 5 Horizontal Slipfitter Mount Replaces standard mounting arm with a cast aluminum Cat. No. ❑ HSF fitter to adapt to a horizontal 1114' to 2" pipe -size ;- mounting end (1 Me' to 23/e" CID). The casting has a ❑ No Option +/ 5u adjustment to accommodate davit arms that are not horizontal. Horizontal Slipfitter for 1 1/4" to 2" Pipe -Size Mount Vertical Slipfitter Mounts Allows fixture or fixtures with standard mounting arm to mount to a pole with a 2" pipe -size Cat. No. includes Mounting tenon (23/a" OD). Minimum 4" tenon length required. Cat. No. (See right) Specify configuration (1 SA, 2SB, 2SL, 35T, 3SY, 4SC) 4" round or square aluminum with flush ❑ No Option cap. Finish to match fixture and arm. NOTE: 3Y only available on round slipfitter. Cat No. Cat. No. Mounting Configuration ❑ VSF-1SA I r ❑ SVSF-1SA � 1 SA - single arm mount ❑ VSF-2SB ❑ SVSF-2SB : 2SB - 2 at 1800 ❑ VSF-2SL ❑ SVSF-2SL 2SL - 2 at 900 ❑ VSF-3ST ❑ SVSF-3ST L 3ST - 3 at 900 ❑ VSF-3SY 3SY - 3 at 1200 ❑ VSF-4SC Round ❑ SVSF-4SC Square 4SC - 4 at 900 Wireless Control In fixture WiHubb® wireless control module features on/off/variable and step dimming, SNAP Cat. No. ❑ WIH-M protocol mesh network, AES-128 encryption detection, occupancy sensor interface and intuitive;, ❑ No Option user-friendly software. The most comprehensive and up to date Information can be found at httpJ/www.hubbell-automation.corn/products/wihubia infixture module/. ® 2012 KIM LIGHTING - P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 - TEL: 626/968-5666 - FAX: 626/369-2695 ALT60 ALTITUDE' LED IGM LJGHTNG 5/14/12 a k1_aIt60_spec.pdf Type: Job: Performance Data Page: 5 of 5 Spectroradlonetric L70 Data Amber 1580nm) Averse 4K Averalte 5 K Avecage 350 mA - 150,000 hours Correlated Color Tem . CCT K 580nrn 4000 WOO 700 mA-100,000 hours Color Rendering Index (CRI) N/A 70 ± 3 70 ± 3 Power Factor 95+ 95+ 95+ Electrical Drive Current ALT60 ALT96 ALT120 350mA 700mA 350mA 700mA 350mA 700rnA Volts -AC Amps - AC System Watts Amps - AC Syslern Watts Amps - AC System Watts Amps - AC I System Watts Amps - AC System Watts Amps - AC System Watts 120 .53 63 1.10 130 .88 105 1.73 208 1.04 125 2.21 266 2D8 .30 63 .63 130 .50 105 1.00 208 .60 125 1.27 266 240 .26 63 .54 130 .44 105 .87 208 .52 125 1.11 266 277 23 63 .47 130 38 105 .75 208 _45 125 .96 266 347 .18 63 37 130 .30 105 .60 208 .36 125 .77 266 480 .13 63 _20 1 130 .22 105 .43 209 .26 125 .55 266 B.U.G. Rating (TM15) in Lumens where B = Backlight. U = UplighL G = Glare Type I Type II Type III Type IV Type IV-NFO Type V Type L/R ALT60 TBD B2 UO G2 B2 UO G2Bl MTBD UO G2 TBD B3 UO G3 B2 UO G3 ALT96 64 UO G4 B3 UO G3 B3 UO G3B7 UO G3 TBD B4 UO G2 B3 UO G3 ALT1120 B4 UO G4 TBD 133 UO G3 TBD 61 UO G3 TBD B4 UO G2 B3 UO G3 Absolute Lunms 350 mA Tem ature T [ Type 11 7 III T III-NFO 7 IV T VT LIR Arnber(580nmP TBD 3639 3686 TB❑ 3659D 3998 3661 ALT60 4000K' TBD 4852 4914 TBD 4878D ZIV-NFO 5330 4881 5000K TBD 6065 6143 TBD 6098D 6663 6101 Arra)er030MO' 5941 5986 6059 TBD 5932 D 5837 5860 ALT96 4000K* 7934 7982 8079 TOD 7910 TBD 7783 7813 5000K 9918 9977 10099 TBD 9887 TBD 9729 9766 Amber [580nm=' 7417 TBD 7615 TBD 7540 TBD 7429 7298 ALT120 4000K* 9880 i80 10153 TBD 10053 TOO 9905 9730 5000K 12362 TBD] 1 12691 TOD 12566 TBD 12381 12163 Absolute Lumen 700 MA Temperature 7 1 T 11 T e III 3 e III-NFO 7 IV Type IV-NFO Type V Type L/R Amber{580nrw TBD 6071 6303 TOD 5927 TBD 6709 5850 ALT60 4000K* TBD 8094 8404 TBD 7903 TBD 8279 7800 5000K TBD 10118 10505 TBD 9879 TBD 10349 9750 Amber(580nm)* 8808 8876 9010 TBD 9203 TBD 9707 8463 ALT96 4011W 11744 11793 12014 TBD 12270 TBD 12942 11284 5000K 14680 14741 15017 TO 15338 TBD 16178 14105 Antl]er(580nm)* 12159 TBD 12506 TBD 12356 TBD 12613 11963 ALT120 4000K* 16212 TBD 16675 TBD 16474 TBD 16817 15951 5000K 20265 TOD 20844 TBD 20593 TBD 21021 19931 LED performance and lumen output continues m improve at a rapid pace. Log onto www.kimlighting.com to download the most current photometric files from Kim Lighting's IES File Library. For custom optics and cola temperature configurations, contactfactory. *Data is prorated from 5000K IES files. 0 2012 KIM LIGHTING • P.O. BOX 60080, CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91716-0080 • TEL: 626/968-5666 • FAX: 626/360-2695 C) N ocar- F2 O 9 O < o D C W _ O W W V O) CA A W N i C> > O W 00 V CD Cn A W N N ` m n (3D 3(D 3( (D C CD ryG� y CCD p7 < O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "� (7 D In „•� Z (p () (D 0) mx mQ- �'Dv'D'D'D-0-V-9-V-Vv-0DDDDDDDDDDDD DnO 'c '� °1 333333333333333333333333 m�z 01 A C) CO O ~ O O (O CD Cfl (n CD O -1 n (7) m D A W O WW W O -� CD N N A A J 00 CID OD W CJ) U) Ln A A CA C) w i+ (D CD W A N M A Cl 00 A W J J (D W (A OD CA W W W (A 0 0 C]. -1 O CD o o N� O (W A A- (D W O A (D 00 A A N W N W W (D A W (A (D m z cn G .. to U1 J Cb CA N CD W CD C) 0) N 0)N C)O= O) W Cn (A (D CD J OD J Cn (n (n CA CA CA 01 W n CD00 � co � W CD > o a CA CO O CO CA O W W w J 00 CA CO A CA O A CD CD m N N W C3)CD (A lD N A OD O W W A N (O O O W CA m CO W O C3) J (A W A < 0O 3 co 1p 0) C)N CD v U) W -� w Cn CA w W 00 O (A CA m m A CA CA m W CD 0 CD< (T N W O OD m W A C) Cn Am m CA W m CO N CO N J (Am W N W W A W A O M W O CA CA W J N (A J CD (A O) (A C)) .. Q- cn< U) J co N O 0 0 A C) cn IV O W W �_ N W A (A 00 W OD J J En U) A A A (A MW� O CD OD CD W CDN (3) W (n Eg oD W J C) A J OD Cn N N A (A 6-1N o o CA A A CA O) O N Co N - (A (A (A Cn (A CA (A W CA 0) W N O O � W O C31 v O 0)o A W CA Ni N A (n (A CD CC OD (D CA 0) On M A (n (A CA W- O CO - - N N En (n (A OD - (A A CD - (A V W OD (A W W CO CA �� o W (A O O) W- W O J A A (A - A 0 W (D O) CD W J J CO () CD D _ CCD O CI7 J ; CQ OD O (O C)N W O CDA O W A CA J N W A (A OD O 00 OD (A Ul (T C3) A (A (A C) W N 0) (D 0) C)CD N co CO O) A W co C) (D N 0) (A (A W N W D) J O (A CD A CO OD (3) J U) - W J N W CA J O O N CO J �� CD OD CT1 D CN W C1 C O) A O N O c) -CWD co N A A A CA MV M M J J M MA W N O (7) D o O C) CP (A N •--� W A (A O (3) W N W V A CA N O J A? (A CO W 00 N (A J O) Cn Cl 0) J N W OD N CJ C3) (A Cl) OD W - A c. W W O� C) W O s N A A m W m (A m CA CA m (n (A N s N J J (A A M N W W W A CS) V W O W" 00 J (n W Cn CA J W i 0 c 3 D o C3) Oo O) - (D W U) N CD N W W N J W O A W A N J CD W =D O < c CO 3.' 00 O nJ C:) (n O J C:)-� C) N W A (A J O M J (A (A CA O (n A (A CA N W Cn J W AC) C) J J O W V (D O O Oo A m W A (A (D A W J J N J A C) (3) OD C) J N CS) CJ) W Co J A J CD A-u N D cD 0 _ C > m 1� D Jvp n k� C� ; m L. �00 �• �- O� �� W L L L 0z� L 1 CD C o w Ca Cn N J O O W C3) CID A O O (D CD (n r�. n J- .9 '% .4 •n � t� LO c 00 mmr c O TOO F ui N m Y N (�DWN CD N O U O Z ❑ �- M m � T V f oL) +4 �wC4 (D U 5 F- Q moon � J ~ Y w q i% C Q CD O (0 Nr I 'It CO M M W M O W M O 'It O IT O O M O M 1` M Q O d 0) CO O 00 M r 1- M CD N m O I- O� n M 1- t0 IT I` N (O O O O 0 O N ` r N 1� t` OD M O O O r N N N N m 00 (O 'q N ❑) 'ED 0 - r O r �3-f T r T r r T r r V � O 111 Q = C) - O C.= U C)M CD 'It (O O CO M CD M M CO W O M M N r M M (n Iq O tO N 1� N r to O r LO (D N v T m N O w n 0 0 I- IT m co o Q a) co ) Q :%i N r r r r r N M CO M T r N CD C)r 0 0 M (D lO M - lO O O `- r O N Y Cl) T r T r r r r r (O 00 O O r 0) N }W } M (A T M O N to .;r I- M N I r M M O M N M M (0 V 0O w 1O d) N N M M ('M N Ln (D If) It Iq o Q a r M (p U N Oj � r 0) Cl) M NM r r r M (O O r N M N N— N r 0 OD n r- 'cY Cl) [D Cl) N N M 0 r T T r r r r r r ((�00 pO r 0 N N C7) CV 0 Y (D L M CO CA 00 N d7 00 O N O) CD CO CO I- LO N N Q O) V M I- (0 I- M M ti M M V N C)M (O M N WIT O M O M In ITCDN Cn UN •-- r M M W 00 M M W O O M M M M O 00 CD 'Y N fO CD O O O �2 .0 O _ H Q M I-- N O Co I- C)r (D (0 � (D Cn [Y (D t_O o o Q a 0 Q M 00 I- M M� M O m N I--00 (n O CD CDI- CD O) 1l- cM to r m Ln M 00 00 00 O) IT r O rM N C)r N� M w O CO 00 LO Cl) [p r r r r r r CD O CD � 1 r r 00 (p m O r i U M LO O M M V O O M N W O M I- r M (n 'It N N (D OD (0 O n ti N to T I-- CD O M N M OD r r- N to O Iq O CO 1- o o Q (() O r Cl) CD C) O0 I- 00 O O(D N M M M O m (D N w r r r O� O Cl) C) r r r 1� r O N O O O O r (/) CO I- fO O 14- M CO LO 'O a N U r Cp O N N 00 O) I� LO N co r CD O 0) N O) N CO lO O O N Q M N Q Q O r ('o LO 00 GO 00 00 0) O O O N M N (M M co I` N Cl) O O 00 00 O M r r r r r r r T-- 00 N O r 7 O O O N ❑ E f6 M M LO O M O'13- W O M V O O W IT M O M ct O O (n (0 M o a Q aD 0_ E 3 U N I-- (D (D (n tT M CO r O CDO I- 'T W CD LO M N M IT M M C) M a �... O r M LO M M M m O (D M CD M M ('M (M C) M (0 I N rf (V O O M O 7 F- O r r r r r r r 1� O N C:) C:) r (n � coW Q) O _N o M � N mp c Nvrn(OLOM MMLOMW TC) OOootnln WM i� m O N O U N S LO ti M r (O Il- CO It (O O (O O CO r (M It to M N M LO Co ¢ 00 a V 0 m I- C r M to M 00 M M M M O r M M M N 00 ao (O M N (0 N co O O O M Q c 0 r r r r r r CD (6 O O OS O r Lo (�vU� o F- O r N d o �VF ¢¢Q¢QQQQQQQQaaaaaaaaaaaa o� Y� m a� m N c o00o0000CD 0o00000000000aFp "m a°�im E o Q U y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T a m a E rn O V N r N M LOi0 1- 00 MO r N r N M f0 CO 1� 00 OD C)T M> o> O O p �J W U j T T r T T❑ Q Q Q> > Cl aai N O CIO E 7 C 3 O U a) n S H t 0 a O N a H i� n �i -n d � 1 d o C) m N o to M 4) _ O U co C'1 0 4) jt55 ~ Y Q U 4, _ 0 R. m01 Q _ _ N C) C)N I- to M M to m M 1- tD M to N V M m N CD M M d tm > I- to I M to O O) (D m to M QO O (D tt') m 00 N (D CD OD (D (D • N NCI) I* It to to (D (D (D 1- W N V M U) O CO O ' p N r- N o > O Q = i M M M N m w m to CD 1- M r to M 1` w m N m� m to M O o Q_ d m n QQ M V v M C)W C)v 1` M 1- (D (D w M 1- O M M le to M Iq to W to u') g M N N O C, O O to (M M p N i 00 to O m N to M a0 M to (D V N r- O O M M� N m N o Q M U T O to M (D W m m O to M to M (o m V W O O O m 1- Or- r N 'V W to to to to W en (D v v N N M 0) 00 C)M O to C:) CD in N I� 00 O V tO Y 4) m 4) ate. o Q h N to to O O UO N m r-� r- N C) C) N M m O) ti (D m m 00 M m m to m m M (D N (M O w v CD tom m C)N'T m m m Iq_ (D M N M le v IT t` r--o I- 1t- to N to m0 O 0 O C:) O O M M 4) _ > Q i N N M I- 1l7 m N O O r- 1` q M N 1- m CD o o < N a- M O I,- to V V N tD to O� (D N I- 00 N CDM m r N ti (O CDM N M NV) It V v (D r-� n O0 (D V Nr M N CD C,00 CD1L C:)p aO 00 co CD O O CO N i = N CDO C) r-m N m N M wm m (D 1-- 1- M to to m o o Q M a i O N r M N M to M C) (D N wO tO 1` C) MW m m M N CO N M M r-- r-- A W t0 CD CD tto M NCI) (D M C) (D C:) to F- t (D 00 N C:) M p N O m C) (D (V i O) 00 N (D CD O M I` w (D M m O N r N r' (D O m tp o o Q to n- > N Q> U O 1` M M 'ct M to N M O O M v m '7 (D (O O � v N M M m v� to to CD f� ti ti (D to [t N to 00 O I- O p V O CD z It � O M O O O OE uJ 2 Q 01 ti (D N 1- N to to C)m W to N O) v O N C) co N tD v o o Q M d N >i 7 O _M aO "T M N M to M m N m co eD 'T CDOO 't co 00 m CD v M N (M M to I� f` r- W to 'IT M N cM M LO C)M OD ~0Oy (O N p �lOo m O (M Z f0 Lo O 4i CO U ILL It Coil 0-- tv N 41 E rL r2 r2 rL 2r rL rL Y Y z J OUQ W >M -0 QQQaQQaQQaQQaaaaaaaaaaaa c moo, < LL (f7 Q Ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O F- a) N f 7 1L 7 C) d~ 4, { N m le W W 1- W C) CD r N M v W co 1- 00 m co m> O e > Q Q Q i tL O J In C] N o U C; C w 3 C) ca L_ U J J N C 0 0 U 7 0 Li U O cn 00 w to N 00 O N O N N N N O) O 00 N� I() co r- O) mM 00 M 0) 00 N N 00� C) r 0 00 (M O'T O) 1- M Lo N co V'IT (() LO N (D co L) O (D I() (1) IT M N r co M C +� M N N O O) 0) O M O O 00 w 0 N lf) O) O N (1) m O m n U) U 00 n In '-T N (D CD r N OD 'IT CO 00 .W M T O) OD M N 00 T ;T r- b7 N Q r CV 'IT to W CO (D In LO to M N N r V Cl) N r� i 00 M M O O O) LO � OD LOM O N CD O r- r- N O (D M U 00 M O M IT m m N m r- CD wN (o I- M (o M (o N IT t` Cl) CDccr N M (o (D ti� ti M (o M UL -� M cM COr r (D U) � O N N R � V Y 0) R d ` to n O (D "T M M O Nr-- O O O 0 0 0 M (O Nr-- 00 Nrl- �t N M V O M st co M (N co M (D to M 14 C) r-- M (O O rb 0) � 0) r N 'qT W (o to lqr (f) u) II) (D W (D (D (o qT M N r N !6� CMa >_ a i O W O O (D I() 1` t-- M M M W CO IT ti M N (D M I- _O N U') a), co N M to r M N LO CD LO O N M M IT� 0 M N N O LL O N V w(o (o (A to to co (D wM (D (O co N r d) _ O N i i ry M O M 1-r- W r--M V M M r- O M O W M (D r- LO US) L U V N O) O ti h r- 0) M O'IT N m O Cl m co (D 00 Vtl- 00 M N 'IT (O (n IT t7 (o to N u) (D M 00 (O IT m N r O N to m i O M N O W (D ti N N O 0o (O ti O) -;r to M O (o r (o P- Q> y V N N (n O) N v (OD LO U') v u) (n (Nn (Nn (O (OO n ((Oo M M co M [D co �¢ 39 r m v 0 E o i V V M O M N W M M O� M t M W O O to V It 00 O N es) 0) 3 7 0 m M N M r W V, W M r M N M V O [D ro IT V tT M M r- 7 O - r NIT CO (n ([) �T rO to u) to W (o (O U') V M N r 0 �m () r U 0) 1- -o O CD to I Q Lj- N O a Q v E¢¢¢ a Q Q a Q Q a¢ a a a a a a a a a a a a a _� �LLu) l- 000000000000000000000000 Q WU- r a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0? 0 0 0 0 � Q (N a U) O co O r O ro O (D r I N o Q co a co Lo � O (OD co 00 N o QM a(o N 00 O(O 00 O r- O I-- O) r CV V Q CD O O (DO 'T .,;r CD (D p(0 r � cM 0 o Qti dr- r 00 O M O M 0 o Q(o a-coco r O F- O CO co co 0 0 O M O O LO a o Qr- dO) m r Lo a +g(D o� 0) O I r�-: ri Q rn a 0 r O M O V 00 N O M O M rn oCD (i LO (n N a s m a)- yi m (D E a)E Q) m�5Haia=1 � Q o < < > a > U N C C 3 0 T j 6 a L_ U J J C O U m 3 U' W U Ir D O U O N T C N N (D WC: m 0 D n a) Ir �6050513 6d05- g6 P2.7-S •CORNER SEC•:B 1`I MONUMENT ler•CASE RECORD POSTYiON ;•i .*' .._ I I I — -- — — -, s8815G'4a•'E_ _ 2647.24- _ ....._. LEGAL ❑SCR{P7ION : ^ PER KING ��UNTY COURT CAUSE #-I2-2-19282-3KNT THAT pCC}RT'% OF THE.'SOUTH HALF OF TFIE THWEST CUARTER OF SL' WN 8, TO&HSHIP 21 NORTl!�� RANG'c 4I E S7 4F THE WIL A ETTE MERID1AfV; IN HIND CA,F,aITY, WASHIN ON, DESCRIBED AS OLLOWS q'�INNIh16 AT A p.$INT 3D:00 r T NORTH Ah�:33.,.�1 FEET WEST OF . 5DUTHEA5i'CDRNER CF T WEST HA{. V1 THE SOUTHEAST :QUARTER Qf E RORT}iWES7i u RTER DF 'AID SECTION B; THENc WEST' ON 7HE N RT I LINE DF TK t REHCH LA]fk- E97HSY. ROAD, SOI,�H 3121h STR . 16K..0 FEAT; THCN(CP,t.DRTH AT RHiri`C;. ANGLE TV SAID 4W£ QI .77 FEET TO TFt SOUTAWESTERLY LINE OF SUENNA COL¢IF,Y RDA9• THENCE 537A6fPE Akl9}7G SRLD 50U7HWESTE 1:7` . �74•66 FEE7:1� IHEN�`i SOVtH 397.23 FEES TO THE POINT OF BEGU�R7INC• =•. •EXCEPT THE SOUTH 425 FEAT RFOF, ' •' EXCEPT THAT PORTION THERE /F C04VEYED TO KIN BOUNTY 6jf DEED•i?EC.DRDED UNDER RFCORAiNG NUV8r-R 537EI7r :' -!D TOGETHER WITH NAT PORTION OF j 50UTHE T IIZU.IOTW-f F THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECT 8, TOW, RANGE 4 EAST QF THE WILLAJTTC;-7RIDIAN, IN•i(iN0 CDSNTY. +R'ASHINGTON, L1fINr� wlFf!IId TFfE FOLLOWING BQUNOARIES'" BEG'►6NIHG AT A POINT 455,QO �EEI �y };TH AND 500.40 FEET WEST2,'-sf AS MEASURED ALONG AND AT AICIIT 2NMC 70 THa SOUTH Lm THEREOF,FRCM 7HE SOUTHEAST CORNE4-QF.THE W-,ST HALF fl3` THE SOUTHEAST 3UART_R 4F rHE NORTHWE%'d�0 �XLR. f,>K•SAI) SECTION 8; THENCE kdk535 E AT RICIIT ATt,.LL TE'•SAID SOUTH L1NE 205,00 FEET TO THE NORM LWE OF SIZE SOUTH BSO.DO FaE7 OF SAID SL43 MS:ON; TF$NCE -SCO D'I� W BB.SO F=£T; T�iENCE SD2004'30•E 137,a deT TD THE FOVNG or sEoi%NING. CONTAINING 7$D.58 SgUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS; SiTLIATE IN H4NG COUNTY WASKNGTON. EAST 1/4 CORNER MONUMENT IN CASE }I� RECORD POSITION SURVEYW-S -CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF RON BINA IN JULY 2003 STEVFP E. WENDOVER, P.L.S. CERTIFICATC NO. 18103 65.51 NORTH I/4 CORNER MONUMENT IN CASE RECORD POSITION lLvNHK@ @@UHVW 11 G�m®@nD) @� @unwln r• s _ r. °} A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN. �o. 0. r.= ryry z,.s n �y'=:, TLfI'•-,.�..• 1 BA5M OF E€SIRING : f-1 , OAYO EYAuvi Assoc rms 96049007 � F�Lf} £OUIPAtEf�' n _ 7 \ NRSON TO:GL'N ft3TAl STATiO(! . pus Id. S-' 20.000:d.118 fL' - N MONUMENT iN CASE' • • � - _ FOJND 05/27/03 - METH_¢D FKi TRAVERSE_:= S6d'54'25"E I37,34' *'• • SET 1/2' WW.. d CAP o. STAMPED LS rEM3 O FOUND CORNER SET BY RONHDYDE .%� MONUMENTS ARE RECORD POSITION AND FOUND AND USED AS NOTED SCALE 50 1" = .90' o so loo n _ =�* "•-''I SURVEYOR'S NOTES p :I•'. SVRV[Y ODES N07 PURPOR- TO SHOW -�+•• :-p h - EkSFIAENTS QF RECOR7, PRESCRIPTIVE '. EASEMENTS OR LOCATION OF UTLITIES _•.` o - ; (EXCEPT AS SHOWN j. at 165.00' = SE C0,31VER WEST 1/2 OE 5S-I/4. NW1/4 CENTER SECTION CRV.0 POSTIgN 6 -- - - _ RECORD PL151TIDN SOUTH 3I2th STREET ' I — — — I6S00' nt` •'355.41'•:. ,M1 • 659.45"+°• f SBfi'S4'25"E 2639.EI' + •-�— ��- �- � .. ���_�! SURVEY FOR: RON BINA 30939 5TH WAY SOUTH FEQfRAL WAY, WA, 98003 RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE Fee .: FILED FOR RECORD THIS Y OF 20175' AT THE RED! IFST OF DELTA SURVEYING AT IL+_9_ M, IN OF RECORDS OFF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDERS FEE NO. �: iA!W 6 — DEPUTY 6C7tFtiY-REeBRR S. 15317 MERIDIAN EAST, lb- te' i,_:= PUYALLUP, WASHINOTON 98375' phone , (253) 848-3729 drawn by doj! d, 74>ic by Jnis no, '•J.L'.E3. C :A�RRON 03—$978 - sRGle sheet (' :j of I I - Q Wh an recorded rstu rn to: Woody Missionedgrar way Church 4 Federal 20101118001825 FID91-ITY NATIO WD 65-00 PAGE-001 OF 004 11/15/2010 15:05 KING COUNTY, WA f .. . .... ......... IE2467317 Fldtj Filed -for reoPrdl wim �J/18/2010 15-.07 XING COUNTY WA Tr.. , 17.169.50 6704'TaCOM8 all gA PAGE-001 OF 001 F T,scom, WA geq§ order No.: 61100305 FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE su7u-r 0'kYWARRANTY-DEED - THE GRANTOR(s) Pool 13rotho coftar"n LLC; a W801r)0r llrnited liabil . fff 90T.6any fof and n CoRsidem6c)n Of !0jC�q::j0qfUn Seo.op), aril a*6r.,,.qW and valuable i consideration . .. . a WRS01910r, •Hpp Profit in hand paid, convoys, and warrants s 16'pediWW:M"on mrchi corporallon a Touching -described re a i estala, situated In the 09urr1y---qf1!in0ists.w of rT- f See Attached Exh lbh "A' Abbreviated 1egal: PTN S 1 t2 NW 1/4 8-21-4 T�PomsfNurn!nrjs): 0821049051 =Tm . -- DBW4"NoOsmbl� 2 Pool Brothers othes 6onsKVion1C BY: aWmw PoW:........ Member X 0%." "of Washington county I -c adgyffiat 1.knew or have utisfactory Movenoe that h.!YT the perspn(s)wbqO*red before me, and said person acknowWged that homey , igned this Instrurnkt, on oa#i stated that (h eJshefthey) was authorized to execute the Instmumn t and acl�t❑w Wwll I t is thB, M arbw of Pool Brothers C o n s tru cuo n, LLC to be the free and —J.4. and pu-inBntioned In the Instrument :Dated:Joi• NUMB' Wlary Publft I `end forihe SUita of Was" Residing at S �,n-c)k-% My appointment expires. C0 4Fz It 40 co z 2 Z wo, S x X. .......... WAWWW.dXIUq*Ut. Ok2llO PdP2d2 WA-Fr4.TMA4)OSl4liW=I-' { ' r1 { i EXHIBIT "A" .r' s LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11XXX S. 312TH ST s ` ThOarid,referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: TMat.portldobf-the South half of the Northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, #.M., in Ring County, Washington, de=ibed as follows: ,?,Beginning at a point 30 feet North and 500.41 feet West of the Southeast corner of the West half of the Southeast ouartar of &6' Northwest quarter of said Section 8; FHEfffCE , est:an,3he Nortliijne of theF+e[Iph Lake County Road, 165 feet; THEi4CE.fdM9 af'right angles; to saidiVorth'ine, 630 feet; `THENCE East:OiralW tii.,the North-jfne of said road, 154.61 feet to the Southwesterly line of Buenna "Canty Road{ v THENCE Squtti 37'01 'ast`aldng said South�+esteily line 17.46 feet; THENCE SouhJ 6lt .22 feet tp tha point df beginning EXCEPT:t at p.oft* tiyereo('corweyed t$ girtig Cqu�y by geed recorded under Recording No. 8606030359; "•, W AND EXCEPT tli jporu h quieted i{i King�trounty.Caiusd'No. 02-2-19282-3, described as follows: That portion of the West hal[-of the Sautheas�'gOAer td the Northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 21 North, Range 4 East. W.M.�in King Cof nty, 9vasijingtpn lying•w.ithin the folic0ing boundaries; r' Beginning at a point 455.0 fee[ North 8nd 560.4� feet Yost, as measured aiong and right angle to the South line thereof, from the Southeast corder df the INst half..to tfe'Soulhessi quarter of the North wes! quarter of said Section 8; THENCE North 01 ° 05. 35 " East at right angle [Os -d SgLth Iiiia 205.00 fs$t to the North line of the South 60.00 feet of said subdivision; THENCE South 07 ° 29' 11 " West 6B.30 feet; THENCE SoW402' 04 ' 30 " East 137.61 feel to the.poirlbofbe inning. This propWty is located:in King County. S t t s• � 1 ,,,r„f } x Y y' 3 `^ EXHIBIT "B" $.UBJE,tT TO: Any riljhls; 1pteresls, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of survey, F�icording'Dale: "May 13, 2005 ate cardi ng, N o.: 2Q05051390 0005 A�greerneni:: Ekecuted hp: Lakehaven Utility District,aftPool Brothers Construction, L.L.C. RecOdi ng Deti : Novemb2007,' 'Recording No ^ 2b071,7 "0 R"inp: Doniestic,sewar and VAter sWire Ri ht fo fr *e a q ece4sawslopes fix cols arf{;lis upar3 sod: premises as granted by Deed; Recording No.:•UOM30359r i t i. ,r h Y ,tom'•.. • ,rps� rix.ruy^S . .. �.-t•. ARC +Y ,,p5 m A aik i O - - r O � W co m C W w co 'J m n m Ib ti y 8703160422 n w F3B BE03180946 a � 33B o v 0 42' a o � � k z o w 2S m ly � w r N N o L. VOL. 14-261-s5-25 '- VOL. lj--m26 m E 665. 9I 42 V 42 n 75 ti sa.46 c073 O r Cl) O O �1 oc S U = r En m�/ � � N O ✓ N . M 13 m 30 G q Bo. 45 o O �,E 37 = V � � O n GeoResources, LLC Ph 253-896-1011 5007 Pacific Hwy. E., Suite 16 Fx 253-896-2633 Fife, Washington 98424 May 22, 2012 RESUBMITTED Federal Way Mission Church AUG 14 2013 405 S. 312th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Attn: Mr. Brian Kim Geotechnical Evaluation Infiltration Feasibility and Testing Maggies Meadow Residential Plat 400 Block of S 312tt' Street Federal Way, Washington PN: 0821049057 Job: FederalWayMissionChurch.S312th.L INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE This letter summarizes the results of our geotechnical evaluation for the infiltration of the site stormwater at the subject site located at the 400 Block of South 312th Street in the City of Federal Way, Washington. The approximate location of the site is shown on Figure 1. We were provided with a Geotechnical report, prepared by others, and a preliminary site plan showing the lot and roadway configuration, as well as the existing and planned site topography. Our understanding of the project is based on our review of the geotechnical report and site plan provided to us, our conversations with the project civil engineer, our site exploration, and our experience with similar projects in the vicinity of the site. We understand the project will consist of 9 single-family residential lots with an on site roadway, lot -specific infiltration facilities, and a stormwater pond. The stormwater pond will be located in the sites' northeast corner, adjacent South 312th Street. Site grading will be limited to construction of the on site roadway and the stormwater pond. The purpose of our service was to perform a subsurface exploration in the planned location of the stormwater facility to determine if infiltration will be feasible. Specifically, the scope of services for this project included the following: 1. Reviewing the available geologic, hydrogeologic and geotechnical data for the site area. 2, Exploring the subsurface conditions in the planned location of the stormwater facilities by monitoring the excavation of several track -hoe excavated test pits. 3. Performing infiltration tests in the location of, and at the planned elevations of the stormwater pond, and representative areas for the lot -specific systems. 4. Addressing the appropriate geotechnical regulatory requirements for the proposed stormwater facility_ 5. Providing our opinion regarding the feasibility of infiltrating the site stormwater. 6. Providing an infiltration rate based on the insitu-testing. Federal Way Mission Church May 22, 2012 Page 2 7. Providing recommendations and design criteria for construction of the stormwater facilities. SITE CONDITIONS Surface The rectangular, approximate 2.3-acre project site is located along the north side of South 312'h Street at the intersection of South 3121h Street and 4'h Avenue South in Federal Way, Washington. The project site is bordered with residential properties to the north, east and west, and South 3121h Street to the south. The surface grades in the vicinity of the site generally slope down from east to west at inclinations ranging from 5 to 15 percent. However, within the site borders, surface grades are generally undulating with variations in elevation ranging from 3 to 8 feet. Site vegetation consists of various medium-sized evergreen and deciduous trees with relatively thin underbrush. No areas of significant erosion were apparent on the site slopes; no standing water was observed on the site at the time of our site work Subsurface Explorations On February 2, 2008, an engineering technician from our office was on site to explore subsurface conditions by observing the excavation of 6 track hoe test pit to a maximum depth of 20 feet below existing surface grades. The approximate test pit locations are shown on Figure 2. The engineering technician continuously monitored the excavation, maintained a log of the subsurface conditions encountered in the test pit, obtained representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features. The specific number, location, and depth of the explorations were selected by GeoResources personnel in the field. The soils encountered were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) described on Figure 3. The explorations performed as part of this evaluation indicate conditions only at the specific locations and the subsurface conditions in other locations could vary. The test pit logs are shown on Figures 4 and 5. Representative soil samples obtained from the test pit were placed in sealed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Grain -size analysis was performed on three of the samples. The results of our grain -size analysis are shown on Figures 6 through 8. Subsurface Conditions The subsurface conditions encountered in the test pit were generally uniform and consistent with the mapped stratigraphy in the area. The soils we observed in the test pits generally consisted of gravel with silt and sand consistent with recessional outwash overlying silty gravel with sand consistent with glacial till. The recessional outwash observed in the upper 2 to 4 feet of the test pits consisted of moist, medium dense, gravel with varying amounts of silt and sand. The glacial till underlying the recessional outwash consisted of moist, dense, moderately cemented silty gravel with sand. All of our test pits were terminated in the dense glacial till. We did not encounter groundwater seepage in the test pit excavated at the site. Based on the mapped stratigraphy, we anticipate during periods of wet weather, a perched groundwater table may develop within the dense glacial till at depths below our explorations. This water table will fluctuate seasonally due to, precipitation, and future Federal Way Mission Church May 22, 2012 Page 3 development both on and off site. Figures 4 and 5 present a more detailed description of the subsurface conditions encountered in the test pit. The approximate test pit location is shown on Figure 2. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our subsurface evaluation and infiltration testing, it is our opinion the soil and groundwater conditions at the site are suitable for infiltration of the site stormwater. The lot -specific infiltration systems should consist of typical infiltration trenches as shown in The King County Surface Water Design Manual. We recommend the infiltration facilities be provided with an overflow to the stormwater system located along the sites' interior roadway. Infiltration Testing We performed a total of three infiltration tests at the site. We performed one infiltration test in the southeast corner of the stormwater pond, one in the western central portion of Lot 2, and one in the approximate center of Lot 4. The infiltration test in the stormwater pond was performed at a depth of 7 feet below surface grades (approximate Elev. 405). The infiltration tests in Lots 2 and 4 were performed at depths of 2.5 and 1.5 feet below surface grades, respectively. According to the city of Federal Way Municipal Code, the city of Federal Way uses the King County Surface Water Design Manual as their stormwater code. We performed our infiltration tests in accordance with the Department of Ecology Falling Head Percolation Test Procedure. Our infiltration test results along with the design rates are shown in the following table: Test Rate Design Rate* Test Location (in/fir) (in/fir) Pond 18 3.0 Lot 2 15 2.5 Lot 4 18 3.0 I'A * The design rates have a factor of safety equal « o applieu. Suspended solids could clog the underlying soil and reduce the infiltration rate for the systems. To reduce potential clogging of the infiltration systems, the infiltration system should not be connected to the stormwater runoff system until after construction is complete and the site areas are landscaped and paved. Temporary stormwater systems may be utilized throughout construction. These temporary systems should be located away from the permanent location of the infiltration facility. Federal Way Mission Church May 22, 2012 Page 4 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Please do not hesitate to call with any additional comments or questions. Respectfully submitted, GeoResources, LLC Principal KSS:BMA:bpk/rmp Document ID: FederalWayMissionChurch.S312th.L Attachments: Figure 1 — Site Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Figure 3 — USCS Figures 4 and 5—Test Pit Logs Figures 6 through 8 — Grain -size Analysis Brett M. Allen, PE Sr. Engineer Approximate Site Location GeoResources, LLG SitL- Vicinity Map 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16 400 Block of South 312th Street Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Federal Way, Washington Fax: 253-896-2633 DocID:FederalWayMissionChurch.S312th.SVM_L_May2012 FRgure1 SE 1/4, NW 1/4, SEC. 8, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., W.M. 50 00 lLiti A+� 88 �•` Y �1 I J ! r —.. c., �� ro,'� i °*:A � a+^a'e I i •� � � 4 A�'� �.dN �F6���ylt i i � � � I I arx�" M• 75-T� sea Ay somata � %� rotes, rc c SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM GROUP GROUP NAME MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAVEL CLEAN SYMBOL GW WELL -GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GRAVEL GP POORLY -GRADED GRAVEL COARSE GRAINED More than 50% SOILS Of Coarse Fraction GRAVEL GM SILTY GRAVEL Retained on WITH FINES No. 4 Sieve GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND CLEAN SAND SW WELL -GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND More than 50% Retained on SP POORLY -GRADED SAND No. 200 Sieve SAND SM SILTY SAND More than 50% Of Coarse Fraction Passes WITH FINES No. 4 Sieve SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC SC ML CLAYEY SAND SILT FINE CL CLAY GRAINED SOILS Liquid Limit Less than 50 ORGANIC OL [:ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT More than 50% CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY Passes No. 200 Sieve Liquid Limit ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT 50 or more HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil Dry- Absence of moisture, dry to the touch in general accordance with ASTM D2488-90. Moist- Damp, but no visible water 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on Wet- Visible free water or saturated, usually soil is ASTM D2487-90. obtained from below water table 3. Description of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and or test data. GeoResources, LLC Unified Soil Classification System 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 16 400 Block of South 312th Street Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Federal Way, Washington Fax: 253-896-2633 Ded eralWayMtssionChurch.S312th May 2012� Figure 5 OCID: F Test Pit TP-1 Location: Northwest corner of proposed storm drainage pond. Depth (ft-I Soil TVVe Description 0.0 - 0.5 Forest Duff 0.5 - 4.0 SM Light brown silty SAND with gravel, some cobbles and roots (tree), medium dense, moist. 4.0 - 20.0 GM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand, some cobbles and boulders to 18 inches, Well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 20 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed Test Pit TP-2 Location: Southeast corner of proposed storm drainage pond. De . th ft. Soil T e Descri tion 0.0 - 0.3 Forest Duff 0.3 - 3.5 SM Light brown GRAVEL with sand, trace silt, some cobbles and roots(tree), medium dense, moist. (Recessional Outwash) 3.5 - 6.0 GM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 6 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed Test Pit TP-3 Location: On lot line for Lots 2 and 3 at 418' contour ❑e 3th ft.) Sail 7 e Descri tiara 0.0 - 0.3 Forest Duff 0.3 - 2.0 SM Light brown silty SAND with gravel, some cobbles and roots (tree), medium dense, moist. 2.0 - 4.0 SM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 4 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 Test Pit Logs 400 Block of South 312t" Street Federal Way, Washington JOB# FederalWayMissionChurch.S312thSt February 2008 Figure 4 Test Pit TP-4 Location: Middle of Lot 4 on 420' contour. Depth ft. Soil Type Descri fion 0.0 - 0.5 Forest Duff 0.5 - 2.5 SM Light brown silty GRAVEL with sand, some cobbles and roots(tree), medium dense, moist. 2.5 - 3.7 SP Gray GRAVEL with slit and sand, some cobbles, medium dense, moist. (Recessional Outwash) 3.7 - 4.0 SM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 4 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed Test Pit TP-5 Location: On lot line of Lots 6 and 7 in low spot. Depth ft. Soil i oe Descri tion 0.0 - 0.2 Forest Duff 0.2 - 2.5 SM Light brown silty GRAVEL with sand, some cobbles and roots(tree), medium dense, moist. 2.5 - 3.0 SP Gray GRAVEL with silt and sand, some cobbles, medium dense, moist. (Recessional Outwash) 3.0 - 3.5 SM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 3 %2 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed Test Pit TP-6 Location: Front of Lot 8 Depth ft. Soil Type Descri tion 0.0 - 0.3 Forest Duff 0.3 - 2.5 SM Light brown silty GRAVEL with sand, some cobbles and roots(tree), medium dense, moist. 2.5 - 3.0 SP Gray GRAVEL with silt and sand, some cobbles, medium dense, moist. (Recessional Outwash) 3.0 - 3.5 SM Gray silty GRAVEL with sand and cobbles, well -graded sand, dense, moist. (Glacial Till) Terminated at 3'/2 feet below the ground surface No caving observed No groundwater seepage observed GeoResources, LLC 5007 Pacific Highway East, Suite 20 Fife, Washington 98424 Phone: 253-896-1011 Fax: 253-896-2633 MSM Test Pit Logs 400 Block of South 312th Street Federal Way, Washington Figure 5 JOB# FederalWayMissionChurc.S312thSt February 2008 I iv H 10C 9C 8C Ir z 6C LL Z 5C W U W 4C o_ 3C 2C m 1C m C Particle Size Distribution Report RUN In 0 qlHIM �u e GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand % Fines +3" r] Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Silt Cla M 0.0 17.0 1 31.0 10.5 13.4 1 12.4 15.7 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC." PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 1-1/2 100.0 1-1/4 96.7 1 95.1 3/4 83.0 1 /2 69.0 3/8 63.7 #4 52.0 #10 41.5 #20 34.0 #40 28.1 #60 23.2 #100 19.3 #200 15.7 11 (no specification provided) Sample Number: 070292 Depth: 2 feet Location: TP4 GeoResources, LLC Fife, WA Material Description Brown Silty Gravel with Sand Sampled by Matt M. on 1/31/2008 Tested by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/2008 Atterberg Limits PL= NP LL= NV Pl= NP Coefficients D85= 19.8454 D60= 7.6477 D50= 4.1604 D30= 0.5268 D15= D10= Cu= Cc= Classification USCS= GM AASHTO= A-1-b Remarks Entered by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/0008 F.M.=4.46 Client: Pool Brothers Project: S. 312th Street Project No: Bernie Knoll Tested By: Tim Bergstrom -- Checked By: Bernie Knoll I 9 Date: 2/4/2008 C] 100 90 so 70 1U 60 Z 50 W 0 W 4a a 30 Particle Size Distribution Report MINIMUM �DOm ■in IN 11111111111 GRAIN SIZE - mm. % Gravel % Sand %+3" Coarse Fine Coarsel Medium Fine 0.0 27.1 34.3 9.3 1 11.5 1 11.9 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC." PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 1-1/2 100.0 1-1/4 96.9 1 87.9 3/4 72.9 1/2 58.9 3/8 51.4 #4 38.6 #10 29.3 #20 23.4 #40 17.8 #60 12.5 #100 9.0 #200 5.9 % Fines Silt 5.9 10 ?0 30 m 40 n m z 50 D sa Cn m ra 30 30 100 Material Description Well Graded Gravel with Silt and Sand Sampled by Matt M. on 1/31/2008 Tested by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/2008 AtterberQ Limits PL= NP LL= NV P1= Coefficients D85=14.1424 D60= 13.2204 D50= 8.9667 D30= 2.1809 DI 5= 0.3247 D1 0= 0.1781 CU= 74.23 Cc= 2.02 Classification fication USCS= GW-GM AASHTO= A-1-a Remarks Entered by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/2008 F.M =5.37 (no specification provided) Sample Number: 070290 Depth: 2.7 feet Location: 7 i' a Date: 2/4/2008 GeoResources, LLC Client: Pool Brothers Project: S. 312th Street Fife WA Proi ct No: Bernie Knoll Figure 7 Tested By: Tim Bergstrom Checked By: Bernie Knoll N L 100 9C 8C 7C W W 6C Z LL Z 5C W U W 4C tl X 2C 1C C Particle Size Distribution Report II �1111111111 MIN �ii ■ GRAIN SIZE - mm. %Gravel % Sand +3" Coarse Fine 1coarsel Medlum Fine 0.0 25.1 39.5 1 16.6 1 12.5 1 3.9 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC." PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 2 100.0 1-1/2 95.8 1-1/4 93.9 1 81.8 3/4 74.9 1/2 65.1 3/8 54.9 #4 35.4 #10 18.8 #20 10.9 #40 6.3 #60 4.0 #100 3.0 #200 2.4 % Fines Silt 2.4 10 >0 30 to 50 30 To 30 30 100 Material Description Well -Graded Gravel with Sand Sampled by Matt M. on 1/31/2008 Tested by Tim Bergstron on 2/4/2008 Atter er Limits PL= LL= Pl= Coefficients D85= 26.8988 Dgp= 10.9788 D50= 8.1934 D30= 3.7490 D 4 r�= 1.4304 D1 p= 0.7491 CU= 14.66 Cc= I.71 Classification USCS= GW AASHTO� Remarks Entered by Tim Bergstrom on 2/4/2008 F.M =5.88 (no specification provided) w Sample Number: 070291 Depth: 3 feet Date: 2/4/2008 Location: TP-2 c ° GeoResources, LLC Client: Pool Brothers Project: S. 312th Street m Fife WA Project No: Bernie Knoll Figure 8 Tested By: Tim Bergstrom Checked By: Bernie Knoll Z .. 4' ti - , HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC Transportation and Civil Engineering FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH PARKING LOT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Federal Way, W.4 Prepared for: Federal Way Mission Church c/o Brian Kim BK Design 36006 1 Ith Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Revised Decunber 2012 RESUBMITTED DEC 12 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup WA 98371 (253) 770 1401 Fax (253) 770 1473 hewhtrztflic.com FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH PARKING LOT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................................ II. Project Description ................................. III. Existing Conditions ................................ IV. Future Traffic Conditions ....................... V. Conclusions and Mitigation .................... Appendix LIST OF TABLES 1. Peak Parking Lot Trips.................................................................................................9 2. 2013 Sunday Peak Level of Service With Project......................................................12 LIST OF FIGURES 1_ Vicinity Map and Roadway System..............................................................................4 2. Site Plan........................................................................................:................................5 3. Existing Sunday Peak Hour Volumes...........................................................................7 4. 2013 Sunday & Weekday Peak Hour Volumes With Project....................................10 2 FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH PARKING LOT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION This report summarizes traffic impacts related to the proposed Federal Way Mission Church parking lot project. The general goals of this impact study concentrate on 1) the assessment of existing roadway conditions and intersection congestion, 2) forecasts of newly generated project traffic, 3) estimations of future delay, and 4) recommendations for mitigation. Preliminary tasks include the detailed collection of roadway information, road improvement information, and peak hour traffic counts. A level of service analysis for existing traffic conditions is then made to determine the present degree of intersection congestion. Based on this analysis, forecasts of future traffic levels on the surrounding street system are found. Following this forecast, the future service levels for the key intersections are investigated. As a final step, applicable conclusions and possible on -site or off -site mitigation measures are defined. The findings of this study are intended to ensure safe and efficient progression of vehicular/non-motorist traffic near the site. II PROJECT DESCRIPTION Federal Way Mission Church is a currently operating church located at 405 S 312th Street, parcel 0821049221 in the city of Federal Way. It is currently comprised of one main building of 19,727 square feet, with an associated 70 stall parking lot with accesses onto 4th Avenue S and S 312th Street. The proposed project consists of a new church parking lot of approximately 190 stalls on parcel 0821049057 on the north side of the existing church lot, on the other side of S 312th Street. New buildings are not a part of the project at this time. A site plan of this lot is attached. Access to the lot is to be provided by two one-way driveways on S 312th Street, with the west one for entering and the east one for exiting. Land use surrounding the site are primarily residential. For traffic analysis purposes, a 2- year horizon was assumed. Figure 1 on the following page shows the project location and the local street network. The proposed site plan showing the overall site layout is shown in Figure 2. III. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Surrounding Roadways The street network serving the proposed project consists of a variety of roadways. Streets near the site consist mainly of two-lane and major arterials. Characteristics for these roadways vary with respect to lane widths, grades, speeds, and function. Differences are based on specific designations and proximity to major employment areas in the region. The major roadways and arterials surrounding the site are listed and described on page 6. 3 rE,r cvcrruKx — ! r % o AA � k r FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH PARKING HEATH & INC Trap p ttal.iOonASSOCIATES, andCivil Eng neer n g j 0 SITE FU>N FIGURE 2 5 S 312th Street is an east -west arterial which borders the south side of the lot, and north side of the church. The pavement surface consists of asphalt concrete and the lane widths are typically 11 feet. The roadway cross section includes one travel lane per direction, a center two-way left turn lane, and sidewalk shoulders on either side. The speed limit is posted at 3 5 mph. Grades are mildly rolling in the vicinity. 4th Avenue S is a north -south two-lane local road which lies on the west side of the site. Pavement surfacing is composed of asphalt concrete and lane widths are around 11 feet. Shoulders are grass/gravel. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. B. Peak Hour Volumes Field data for this study was taken in November of 2011 during the Sunday peak hour. The Sunday traffic count was taken between the hours of 11:00 AM and 1:00 PM. This specific peak period was targeted for analysis based on the schedule of services at the church and background peak volumes on the roadways. The current Federal Way Mission Church schedule on Sunday includes services at 8:00, 9:45, and 11:30 AM. The weekday schedule typically consists of morning prayers, with evening prayers also scheduled on Wednesdays. Figure 3 on the following page shows the existing Sunday peak volumes for the nearby intersection of S 312th Street and 4th Avenue S. For analysis purposes, the count volumes are focused on the 11:00 to 12:00 time frame to account for outbound traffic from the 9:45 service as well as inbound traffic for the 11:30 service. Additional trips for the main church access were assumed based on the estimated attendance and stall requirements, along with the through volumes from the intersection count. Some modifications were made to increase the trips up to meet the estimated high end of 102 inbound and outbound church trips (see Table 1 in Section IV). C. Non -Motorist Traffic Based on observations made during visits to the site, minor pedestrian or bicycle traffic was noted near the site during the Sunday peak hour. Higher volumes may be expected during warmer seasons and during the weekdays. Federal Way Mission Church attendees currently arrive via passenger vehicle, as is typical for churches. D. Transit Service A review of the Metro Transit regional bus schedule indicates that transit service is provided near the project. Route 901 runs along S 312th Street and provides service to Mirror Lake and the Federal Way Transit Center. The route operates on Sundays starting after 10 AM, with headways of roughly 30 minutes. Little if any transit use may be expected by Mission Church attendees. 6 F. Sight Distance at Access Driveways Location of the proposed parking lot is on the north side of 312th Street S, across the street from the church site. 312th Street S has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. According to AASHTO standards, a 40 mph design speed has a minimum entering sight distance (ESD) of 445 feet and a minimum stopping sight distance (SSD) of 305 feet. Measurements at the east access point, for exiting traffic, indicate ESD and SSD to the east are both well in excess of 500 feet. ESD to the west is in excess of 500 feet, with SSD to the west at approximately 500 feet. There is a crest and sag vertical curvature to the west, however 3.5 foot objects would remain in sight throughout this curvature, and all sight distance minimums are met at this location. Field review at the west access point, to align with 4th Ave S, indicates that ESD and SSD exceeds the minimum requirements. ESD and SSD to the west are greater than 500 feet, ESD to the east is greater than 500 feet, and SSD to the east is approximately 500 feet. Some trees and vegetation are currently a minor hindrance but would be removed as a part of development. Note that as the west access is to be for entering traffic only (exiting the traffic stream), the ESD requirement at this location (relating to entering the traffic stream) would not apply. Sight distance photos are included in the appendix. The photos were taken using a 2.25 foot high traffic cone with pink flagging tape on a rod at 3.5 feet high, at a point 14.5 feet back from the edge of the passenger- vehicle traveled way representing the driver eye position per AASHTO standards. The object height used in the measurements is 3.5 feet. Plan view sight distance triangles are also provided in the appendix. IV. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation As no new buildings are a part of the project at this time, there is no actual new trip generation associated with the project. However, some trips are to be applied to the new parking lot access in order to perform an access LOS analysis. The Traffic Mitigation Plan (TMP) parking analysis indicates an average estimated total parking demand of 85 stalls, or a high end (85th percentile) estimate of parking demand of 102 stalls based on number of attendees. For the most conservative analysis, this report uses the 102 estimate as a volume for both inbound and outbound trips in between services during the Sunday peak hour. Parking lot analysis trips are shown in Table 1. Note that these are not considered new trips but are a higher end estimation of current trip levels to assign to the parking lots in the future scenario. TABLE 1 Sunday Peak Parking Lot Trips (Combined Lots) Time Period Volume Sunday Peak Inbound 102 vph Sunday Peak Outbound 102 vph Sunday Peak Total 204 vph These vehicular trip numbers can be used to estimate the number of pedestrians during the peak hour. From the TMP submitted for this project, an Average Vehicular Occupancy of 2.3 is expected. Therefore, 102 vehicles would translate to 44 pedestrian groups. When both inbound and outbound trips are considered, 44 x 2 = 88 total pedestrian crossing groups would occur. Many of these pedestrian groups would further group together and cross at the same time. This analysis assumes roughly 22 pedestrian crossing groups during the peak hour, based on grouping and assuming substantial use of the new lot. B. Distribution & Assignment Trip distribution describes the process by which project generated trips are dispersed on the street network surrounding the site. Sunday trips generated by the project are expected to have a roughly 50/50 split easterly and westerly on S 312th Street. C. Roadway Improvements A review of the City of Federal Way Six -Year Road Improvement Program for 2011 to 2016 indicates that there are no roadway improvement projects in the immediate area. D. Peak Hour Volumes For analysis purposes, 2013 was selected as the horizon study year to study traffic impacts after two years. Future 2013 traffic volumes without the project were derived by applying a 3 percent annual growth rate to the S 312th Street & 4th Avenue S intersection volumes of Figure 3. This adjacent intersection was used to determine through volumes across the parking lot access intersection. The 3 percent annual growth rate should be higher than what might be expected, and would account for any pipeline projects in the vicinity for which Sunday volumes would not be analyzed. Figure 4 represents 2013 traffic volumes with the new parking lot in place. The availability of this lot resulted in some existing turning movements at the main church access to the south being reassigned to the new lot, with some favoritism for right turns for inbound trips. The same parking lot trips of 102 inbound and 102 outbound trips are assumed for this scenario. Note that one access point for the new lot is assumed for a worst case analysis. 10 E. Level of Service Future peak hour delays were determined through the use of the Highway Capacity Manual 2000. Capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS) which is an established measure of congestion for transportation facilities. LOS is defined for a variety of facilities including intersections, freeways, arterials, etc. A complete definition of level of service and related criteria can be found in the HCM. The methodology for determining the LOS at signalized intersections strives to determine the volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for the various intersection movements as well as the average control delay for those movements. Delay is generally used to measure the degree of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost time. Control delay, in particular, includes movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. The methodology for determining the LOS at unsignalized intersections strives to determine the potential capacities for the various vehicle movements and ultimately determines the average total delay for each movement. Potential Capacity represents the number of additional vehicles that could effectively utilize a particular movement, which is essentially the equivalent of the difference between the movement capacity and the existing movement volume. Total delay is described as the elapsed tirne from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Average total delay is simply the mean total delay over the entire stream. A number of factors influence potential capacity and total delay including the availability/usefulness of gaps. The range for intersection level of service is LOS A to LOS F with the former indicating the best operating conditions with low control delays and the latter indicating the worst conditions with heavy control delays. Detailed descriptions of intersection LOS are given in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Analysis results for the 312th St/4th Ave, 312th St/New Lot Entrance, and 312th St/Main Entrance intersections during the Sunday peak hour can be found in Table 2. Level of service calculations were made through the use of the automated intersection analysis program Synchro 6. This program follows Chapter 17 procedures of the HCM for unsignalized intersection analysis. LOS, average delays, and 95th percentile queue lengths (in feet) are provided. 11 TABLE 2 Future Sunday Peak Hour Level of Service Delays Given in Seconds Per Vehicle Intersection Control Annroacli LOS Delay QLeue 312th St/4th Ave/Ent Stop Northbound D 28.3 32 Eastbound LT A 8.6 4 Westbound LT A 8.7 3 312th St/Exit Stop Southbound D 25.2 54 312th St/Main Ent Stop Northbound E 35.3 87 Westbound LT A 8.9 5 The table shows LOS E delays for outbound project traffic at the existing main entrance. With the additional lot allowing for an inbound right turn option coming from either direction on S 312th Street, queuing on the center two-way left turn lane should be minimal along this stretch of S 312th Street during the peak interval. Note that a 0.25 peak hour factor was applied to the church turning movement volumes to account for the short duration high volume scenario between services. The LOS analysis also assumes 22 pedestrian crossing groups affecting the new lot exit during the peak, and does not allow for two step left turns at the new lot access or the main lot access due to the pedestrian raised curb refuge island. F. Left Turn Warrants For this impact study, procedures described by WSDOT Design Manual (Figure 1310- 15a) would be used to ascertain storage requirements on S 336th Street at the access. However a center- two-way left turn lane is already provided. No analysis is required. G. Pedestrian Safety Pedestrians would be required to cross the street from the parking lot to the church. In order to facilitate this movement, a painted crosswalk with pedestrian signage is to be added. Crosswalk location would be to the east of the parking lot. The crosswalk will include a center refuge island per Federal Way drawing # 3-58. Push button flashing pedestrian lights by shall be installed per City of Federal Way comments. Another possibility to enhance safety could be to have personnel stationed to assist with pedestrian crossing during the peak Sunday times. Sidewalks are currently provided on both sides of 312th Street S. A pedestrian pathway from the sidewalk on the south side of the street leading into the church site should be added to facilitate pedestrian traffic. H. Parking Lot Access The site plan shows two access points to S 312th Street. This layout exceeds Federal Way standards of no more than one driveway for each 330 feet of lot frontage. The access configuration of entering only at the west access, and exiting only at the east 12 access, results in one-way flow and mitigating the driveway spacing requirement. Turning restrictions to right -in or right -out only at either access should not be needed based on the adequate sight distance provided as described previously. V. CONCLUSIONS & MITIGATION The Federal Way Mission Church parking lot project consists of a new parking lot on the north side of S 312th Street across the street from the existing church. Approximately 190 parking stalls are planned. A peak parking demand of 102 vehicles may be anticipated for the church, many of which would first fill the existing 70 stall parking lot. The new lot would allow for a choice of a right turn into a church lot coming from either direction, which would lessen the numbers of inbound left turn movements and reduce queuing in the center two-way left turn lane. Little pedestrian traffic is currently found near the site. Transit service is provided near the project, but no service is provided on Sundays. Entering and stopping sight distance for the entrances should be adequate based on field measurements and the site location on the vertical curve of the road. Future delay conditions in the area are outlined in Table 2. Future delays of up to LOS E were calculated for the Sunday peak hour assuming higher than expected activity and enter only/exit only operation at the two new lot accesses. The LOS E delay would be for the existing main lot access to the south. Based on the above, the following mitigations are identified: Users of the new lot would need to cross S 312th Street on foot to get to the church building. Provide measures of safety for pedestrians making this crossing. A painted crosswalk with pedestrian signs and an extiuded curb island located in the middle lane should be added. This crosswalk would be to the east of the parking lot access. Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon System pedestrian flashers, by Spot Devices at the pedestrian crosswalk. Construction would be to City of Federal Way standards, and would be pending review and approval of the City. 3. If deemed necessary, provide attendants to direct pedestrians crossing S 312th Street during the peak Sunday times between services. If the need is to direct traffic in the public right of way certified flaggers should be used. 4. Construct a pedestrian path from the sidewalk on S 312th Street to the church building. 13 FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH PARKING LOT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX 14 LEVEL OF SERV ICE The following are excerpts from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual - Transportation Research Board Special Report 209. Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service (LOS) is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six LOS are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each level, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and the driver's perception of those conditions. Level -of -Service definitions The following definitions generally define the various levels of service for arterials. Level of service A represents primarily free -flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are seldom impeded in their ability to maneuver in the traffic stream. Delay at signalized intersections is minimal. Level of service B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. The ability to maneuver in the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and delays are not bothersome. Level of service C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the average free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Level of service D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free -flow speed. Level of service E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of one- third the free -flow speed or less. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. 15 Level of service F characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds, from less than one- third to one -quarter of the free -flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with long delays and extensive queuing. These definitions are general and conceptual in nature, and they apply primarily to uninterrupted flow. Levels of service for interrupted flow facilities vary widely in terms of both the user's perception of service quality and the operational variables used to describe them. For each type of facility, levels of service are defined based on one or more operational parameters that best describe operating quality for the subject facility type. While the concept of level of service attempts to address a wide range of operating conditions, limitations on data collection and availability make it impractical to treat the full range of operational parameters for every type of facility. The parameters selected to define levels of service for each facility type are called "measures of effectiveness" or "MOE's", and represent available measures that best describe the quality of operation on the subject facility type. Each level of service represents a range of conditions, as defined by a range in the parameters given. Thus, a level of service is not a discrete condition, but rather a range of conditions for which boundaries are established. The following tables describe levels of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of avers e control delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time, as well as time from movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. Level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is determined for each minor movement. Signalized Intersections - Level of Service Control Delay per Level of Service Vehicle (sec) A <_10 B > 10 and <_ 20 C > 20 and <_35 D >35and <_55 E > 55 and <_ 80 F > 80 In Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay per Vehicle (sec) <_10 >10and <_15 >15and <_25 >25 and :535 > 35 and :550 > 50 As described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, level of service breakpoints for all - way stop controlled (AWSC) intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from distinct kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an AWSC intersection. Thus a higher level of control delay is acceptable at a signalized intersection for the same level of service. AWSC Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F 17 Average Total Delay per Vehicle (sec) s10 > 10 and <_ 15 >15and <_25 > 25 and :535 > 35 and s50 > 50 Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay per Vehicle sec <_ 10 >10and <_15 >15and<_25 > 25 and <_35 > 35 and <_ 50 > 50 As described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, level of service breakpoints for all - way stop controlled (AWSC) intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from distinct kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an AWSC intersection. Thus a higher level of control delay is acceptable at a signalized intersection for the same level of service. AWSC Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay Per Vehicle sec <10 >10and <_15 >15and <_25 > 25 and <_35 >35 and <_50 > 50 17 Remark I Hour Morning Prayers 1 6:00 am - 8:00 am Evening Prayers 1 7:30 pm - 9:00 pm 19 Mon Tues Wens Thur Fri 40 people 40 people 40 people 40 people 40 people 25 cars 25 cars 25 cars 25 cars 25 cars 70 people 45 cars Sunday 8:00 am - 9:30 am 100 people 9:45 am - 11:15 am 130 people 11:30 am - 12:45 pm 170 people 19 Heath & Aswciates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 I3miine PeintnM-I Inehikorf File Name : 3288a Site Code 00003288 Start Date : 11 /27/2011 Page No : 1 312TH ST S 4TH AVE S 312TH ST S Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Ai ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Rig ht Thru Left lnt. Total Factor 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM Tot -,)I 0 0 0 0 62 115 117 95 389 1 0 4 1 6 3 4 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 6 2 4 6 1 113 97 115 137 0 0 0 0 182 223 246 234 13 462 0 885 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 110 117 90 117 434 2 2 2 3 9 3 4 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 51 1 2 0 8 2 1 3 0 6 127 130 134 143 534 0 0 0 0 0 255 254 235 264 1008 Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0.0 0.0 823 98.2 43.5 15 1.8 0.8 26 65.0 1.4 0 0.0 0.0 14' 35.0 0.7 19 1.9 1.0 996 98.1 52.6 0 0.0 0.0 1893 N N u] FCO 1 8(1 y North N� F � /-2 N N N w 2 111/27/2011 11:00:00 AM r" °' c 1111127/2011 12:45:00 PM CV Unshifted w O o— Left �14 26 --A 74 Out In Total 4TH AVE S 20 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3288a Site Code : 00003288 Start Date : 11 /27/2011 Page No : 2 4TH AVE S 312TH ST S 312TH ST S Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left App Total Right Thru Left App- Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 11:O0 AM to 12:45 PM - peak 1 0•. 1 Intersection Volume 12:00 PM 0 434 9 443 17 0 8 25 6 534 0 540 1008 Percent 0.0 98.0 2.0 68.0 0.0 32.0 1.1 98.9 0.0 12:45 Volume 0 117 3 120 1 0 0 1 0 143 0 143 264 Peak Factor 0.955 High Int. 12:45 PM 12:00 PM 12:45 PM Volume 0 117 3 120 9 0 5 14 0 143 0 143 Peak Factor 0.923 0.446 0.944 N N a0 North 1f�712411 12' 0:00 PM a .9�a 11/27/2011 12:45:00 PM r O l7atshlRed 1-0 1� F► Left Right 8 140 Out In Total 21 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity AnaWs Existing Sunday Peak Volumes 1: S 312th St & 4th Ave S 2/16/2012 Movement Lane Configurations Sign Control Grade Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol v02, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Direction., Lane # Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS ---I, ■-- EST EBR WBL WBT NBL NSR Vi t Y Free Free Stop 0% 0% 0% 462 16 10 389 20 12 0.92 0.25 0.25 0.92 0.25 0.25 502 64 40 423 80 48 EB 1 566 0 64 1700 0.33 0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) WB1 40 40 0 1016 0:04 3 8.7 A 0.8 566 566 4.1 2.2 96 1016 WB2 423 0 0 1700 0,25 0 0.0 2.7 35.3% 15 TWLTL 0 1037 534 534 503 1037 534 6.4 6.2 5.4 3.5 3.3 72 91 285 550 NB 1 12'8 80 48 348 0.37 41 21.3 C 21.3 C ICU Level of Service A Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 22 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analos Existing Sunday Peak Volumes 5: S 312th St & Main Church Entrance 2/16/2012 --I,. --- Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'i t Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 436 38 38 361 38 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.25 0.25 0.92 0.25 0.25 Hourly flow rate (vph) 474 152 152 392 152 152 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL Median storage veh) 0 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 626 1246 550 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 550 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 696 vCu, unblocked vol 626 1246 550 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 84 31 72 cM capacity (veh/h) 965 219 539 Direction. Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 Volume Total 626 152 392 304 Volume Left 0 152 0 152 Volume Right 152 0 0 152 cSH 1700 965 1700 312 Volume to Capacity 0.37 0.16 0.23 0.98 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 14 0 255 Control Delay (s) 0.0 9.4 0.0 82.6 Lane LOS A F Approach Delay (s) 0.0 2.6 82.6 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary Average Delay 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Heath & Associates, Inc. 23 Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Sunday Peak With Lot 1: S 312th St & Lot Entrance/4th Ave 12/3/2012 -11 t --0- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SET SBR Lane Configurations I T I T 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 12 464 16 10 401 23 20 0 12 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.25 0.92 0.25 0.25 0.92 0.25 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 48 504 64 40 436 92 44 0 27 0 0 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 528 568 1148 1240 536 1189 1226 482 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 528 568 1148 1240 536 1189 1226 482 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 95 96 73 100 95 100 100 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1049 1014 166 162 548 148 165 589 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 NB. 1 -- Volume Total 48 568 40 528 71 Volume Left 48 0 40 0 44 Volume Right 0 64 0 92 27 cSH 1049 1700 1014 1700 225 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.33 0.04 0.31 0.32 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 3 0 32 Control Delay (s) 8.6 0.0 8.7 0.0 28.3 Lane LOS A A D Approach Delay (s) 0.7 0.6 28.3 Approach LOS D Intersection 5ummar Average Delay 2.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 24 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Future Sunday Peak With Lot 3: S 312th St & Lot Exit 12/3/2012 ■-- --1. i�-- 1 EBL ErBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations t T Sign control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 0 476 422 0 23 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.25 0.92 0.92 0.25 0.25 0.25 Hourly flaw rate (vph) 0 517 459 0 92 48 Pedestrians 22 22 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 2 2 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 481 1020 481 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 481 1020 481 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 64 92 cM capacity (veh/h) 1072 255 579 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB: i. SB i- Volume Total 517 459 140 Volume Left 0 0 92 Volume Right 0 0 48 cSH 1700 1700 315 Volume to Capacity 0.30 0.27 0.44 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 54 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 25.2 Lane LOS D Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 25.2 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Heath & Associates, Inc. 25 Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analos Future Sunday Peak With Lot 5: S 312th St & Main Church Entrance 12/3/2012 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBA Lane Configurations T+ + Y Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 473 26 15 396 26 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.25 0.25 0.92 0.25 0.25 Hourly flow rate (vph) 514 104 60 430 104 60 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (fit) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 618 1117 566 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 618 1117 566 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 94 52 89 cM capacity (veh/h) 972 217 527 Direction. Lane 4 EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 Volume Total 618 60 430 164 Volume Left 0 60 0 104 Volume Right 104 0 0 60 cSH 1700 972 1700 277 Volume to Capacity 0.36 0:06 0.25 0.59 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5 0 87 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.9 0.0 35.3 Lane LOS A E Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.1 35.3 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Heath & Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 26 11M: or� 500' East of E Access looking West (zoomed) 28 T _ter e t. _ T� �r- . - - rF•_ •��� __ LYE _ � .,-_ry F wow—_ F1 I-k 'Ail f y 1 M— SOO' East of Potential W Access looking West (zoomed) 31 32 IIIII =. Fidelity National Title Compaig of Washington Underwritten by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 3500 188th St. SW, Suite 300 Lynnwood, WA 98037 (425) 771-3031 / (425) 771-3031 Fax No. (425) 771-7910 FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH 405 S. 321 ST ST, FEDERAL WAY, WA. 98023 Title Order Number: 2-100705645 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to serve you, We appreciate your business and will strive to merit the confidence you have shown in us. Enclosed: OWNERS POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Please call us whenever we can be of further assistance. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company RECEIVED APR U 6 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Fidelity National Title Insurance Company POLICY NO.: 27-031-06-100705645 OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Issued by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given the Company under this Policy must be given to the Company at the address shown in Section 18 of the Conditions. COVERED RISKS SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B, AND THE CONDITIONS, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (the "Company') insures, as of Date of Policy and, to the extent stated in Covered Risks 9 and 10, after Date of Policy, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance, sustained or incurred by the Insured by reason of I. Title being vested other than as stated in Schedule A. 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title. This Covered Risk includes but is not limited to insurance against loss from (a) A defect in the Title caused by (i) forgery, fraud, undue influence, duress, incompetency, incapacity, or impersonation; (ii) failure of any person or Entity to have authorized a transfer or conveyance; (W) a document affecting Title not properly created, executed, witnessed, sealed, acknowledged, notarized, or delivered; (iv) failure to perform those acts necessary to create a document by electronic means authorized bylaw, (v) a document executed under a falsified, expired, or otherwise invalid power of attorney; (vi) a document not properly filed, recorded, or indexed in the Public Records including failure to perform those acts by electronic means authorized by law, or (vii) a defective judicial or administrative proceeding. (b) The lien of real estate taxes or assessments imposed on the Title by a governmental authority due or payable, but unpaid. (c) Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. The term "encroachment" includes encroachments of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land, and encroachments onto the Land of existing improvements located on adjoining land. 3. Unmarketable Title. 4. No right of access to and from the Land. 5. The violation or enforcement of any law, ordinance, permit, or govemmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (a) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land; (b) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (c) the subdivision of land, or (d) environmental protection Copyright American La nd Title Association. All rights reset ved.The use or this Fon.: is re stride to ALTA licensees anCALTA, rnem be rs in .... good stanaing as oT the date- of use. All ether uses are pro ;i^ded. Fe printed under license from the American land 1 itle nssnciatian. 9 FDWAG027.rdw ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06) if a notice, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records setting forth the violation or intention to enforce, but only to the extent of the violation or enforcement referred to in that notice. 6. An enforcement action based on the exercise of a governmental police power not covered by Covered Risk 5 if a notice of the enforcement action, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records, but only to the extent of the enforcement referred to in that notice. 7. The exercise of the rights of eminent domain if a notice of the exercise, describing any part of the Land, is recorded in the Public Records. 8. Any taking by a governmental body that has occurred and is binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without Knowledge. 9. Title being vested other than as stated Schedule A or being defective (a) as a result of the avoidance in whole or in part, or from a court order providing an alternative remedy, of a transfer of all or any part of the title to or any interest in the Land occurring prior to the transaction vesting Title as shown in Schedule A because that prior transfer constituted a fraudulent or preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws; or (b) because the instrument of transfer vesting Title as shown in Schedule A constitutes a preferential transfer under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws by reason of the failure of its recording in the Public Records (i) to be timely, or (ii) to impart notice of its existence to a purchaser for value or to a judgment or lien creditor. 10. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the Title or other matter included in Covered Risks 1 through 9 that has been created or attached or has been filed or recorded in the Public Records subsequent to Date of Policy and prior to the recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred in defense of any matter insured against by this Policy, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY 6704 TACOMA MALL BLVD #200 TACOMA, WA 98409 Authorized Signatory FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY D BY14iryiQvttA.,�t $eCMatY Copyrinht American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.The use or this Form is restricted to ALTO licensees and i-LT.A,nemL•ers in good standing as of the date et use All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association, ..... FDWA0027.rdw ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay toss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees. or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law. ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting, or relating to (i) the occupancy: use. or enjoyment of the Land: (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land; or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws. ordinances. or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2_ Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant: (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant: (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10); or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim: by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public ]records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a)"Amount of Insurance": The amount stated in Schedule A, as may be increased or decreased by endorsement to this policy, increased by Section 8(b). or decreased by Sections 11 and 12 of these Conditions. (b) "Date of Policy": The date designated as 'Date of Policy" in Schedule A. (c) "Entity": A corporation. partnership, trust, limited liability company, or other similar legal entity. (d)"Insured": The Insured named in Schedule A. (i) The term Insured" also includes (A) successors to the Title of the Insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase, including heirs, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, or next of kin; (B) successors to an Insured by dissolution, merger. CONDITIONS consolidation, distribution, or reorganization; (C) successors to an Insured by its conversion to another kind of Entity; (D) a grantee of an Insured under a deed delivered without payment of actual valuable consideration conveying the Title (1)if the stock, shares, memberships, or other equity interests of the grantee are wholly -owned by the named Insured, (2) if the grantee wholly owns the named Insured, (3) if the grantee is wholly - owned by an affiliated Entity of the named Insured, provided the affiliated Entity and the named Insured are both wholly -owned by the same person or Entity, or (4) if the grantee is a trustee or beneficiary of a trust created by a written instrument established by the Insured named in Schedule A for estate planning purposes. (ii) With regard to (A), (B), (C), and (D) reserving, however, all rights and defenses as to any successor that the Company would have had against any predecessor Insured. (e) "Insured Claimant: An Insured claiming loss or damage. (f) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or notice that may be imputed to an Insured by reason of the Public Records or any other records that impart constructive notice of matters affecting the Title. (g) "Land": The land described in Schedule A, and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right. title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is insured by this policy. ..�■ C onvrip fit Amrx ri—n Land Title Assue iu lien. All rights rnset ved, Thr uye utllrir. FO mt is re Siri [10 C. to i•LT%�hCi_n59..h ail+: Al T.: rrr-mt:_rs in g OOd Fran,'mu as 01 the Cafe of oc� : 11 Other!r�ea a I e Lrohl Wtca koplinted Unger ll_Ens6 trern thB -kruerir;.an Land F"le Ssovation ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17106) (h) "Mortgage": Mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (i) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property -to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. With respect to Covered Risk 5(d), "Public Records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States District Court for the district where the Land is located. 0) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. (k)"Unmarketable Title": Title affected by an alleged or apparent matter that would permit a prospective purchaser or lessee of the Title or lender on the Title to be released from the obligation to purchase, lease, or lend if there is a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the Insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the Land, or (ii) an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given to the Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT The Insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 5(a) of these Conditions, (ii) in case Knowledge shall come to an Insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest that is adverse to the Title, as insured, and that might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if the Title, as insured, is rejected as Unmarketable Title. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured Claimant to provide prompt notice, the Company's liability to the Insured Claimant under the policy shall be reduced to the extent of the prejudice. 4. PROOF OF LOSS In the event the Company is unable to determine the amount of loss or damage. the Company may, at its option. require as a condition of payment that the Insured Claimant furnish a signed proof of loss. The proof of loss must describe the detect, lien. encumbrance, or other matter insured against by this policy that. constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible. the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. 5. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS (a) Upon written request by the Insured. and subject to the options contained in Section 7 of these Conditions, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an Insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim covered by this policy adverse to the Insured. This obligation is limited to only those stated causes of action alleging matters insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the Insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Insured as to those stated causes of action. It shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any tees, costs, or expenses incurred by the Insured in the defense of those causes of action that allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, in addition to the options contained in Section 7. of these Conditions, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act that in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title, as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable to the Insured. The exercise of these rights shall not be an admission of liability or waiver of any provision of this policy. If the Company exercises its rights under this subsection, it must do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Companybrings an action or asserts a defense as required or permitted by this policy. the Company may pursue the litigation to a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and it expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from any adverse judgment or order_ 6. DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE (a) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding and any appeals, the Insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, including the right to use, at its option. the name of the Insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the Insured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (ii) in any other lawful act that in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the Title or any other matter as insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Insured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. (b)The Company may reasonably require the Insured Claimant to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and to produce for examination, inspection, and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by the authorized representative of the Company, all records, in whatever medium maintained, including books, ledgers, checks, memoranda. correspondence. reports, e-mails, disks, tapes, and videos whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further; if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Insured Claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect, and copy all of these records in the custody or control of a third party that reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Insured Claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the r Cupyrinht. Mia ric:�n Land Title Asvnriatiwr, All Ii[Inis res erved.The use Ct this F.;nnl•: n�str ctee Iv nLT4 ❑r,?n"CS tun At T%-, nFlrrt;=rs irr ..... good slo.xi na as of the date rrf use. All athermses are 7:IonaC'led, Reprinted IInCEr I con se frOnn th> Amc-mean Land Title :S AC crah6 n. ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17106) reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Insured Claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce any reasonably requested information, or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this subsection, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 7. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the Amount of Insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees. and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment or tender of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations of the Company to the Insured under this policy. other than to make the payment required in this subsection, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. (b)To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. (i) To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Insured Claimant any claim insured against underthis policy. In addition, the Company will pay any costs, attorneys' fees. and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay; or (ii) To pay or otherwise settle with the Insured Claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incurred by the Insured Claimant that were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and that the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in subsections (b)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the Insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage, other than the payments required to be made. shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute. or continue any litigation_ 8. DETERMINATION AND EXTENT OF LIABILITY This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured Claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy. (a)The extent of liability of the Company for loss or damage under this policy shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the Amount of Insurance; or (ii) the difference between the value of the Title as insured and the value of the Title subject to the risk insured against by this policy. (b) If the Company pursues its rights under Section 5 of these Conditions and is unsuccessful in establishing the Title. as insured. (1) the Amount of Insurance shall be increased by 10%, and (ii) the Insured Claimant shall have the right to have the loss or damage determined either as of the date the claim was made by the Insured Claimant or as of the date it is settled and paid- (c) In addition to the extent of liability under (a) and (b), the Company will also pay those costs, attorneys' flees, and expenses incurred in accordance with Sections 5 and 7 of these Conditions. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY (a) If the Company establishes the Title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the Land, or cures the claim of Unmarketable Title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused to the Insured. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals, adverse to the Title, as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to the Insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses, shall reduce the Amount of Insurance by the amount of the payment. 11. LIABILITY NONCUMULATIVE The Amount of Insurance shall be reduced by any amount the Company pays under any policy insuring a Mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the Insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is executed by an Insured after Date of Policy and which is a charge or lien on the Title: and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment to the Insured under this policy. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS When liability and the extent of loss or damage have been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions, the payment shall be made within 30 days. 13. RIGHTS OF RECOVERY UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT (a)Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, it shall be subrogated and entitled to the rights of the Insured Claimant in the Title and all other rights and remedies in respect to the claim that the Insured Claimant has against any person or property, to the extent of the amount of any loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses paid by the Company. If requested bythe Company, the Insured Claimant shall execute documents to evidence the transfer to the Company of these rights and remedies. The Insured Claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise, or settle in the name of the Insured Claimant and to use the name of the Insured Claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights and remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured Claimant. the Company shall defer the exercise of its right to recover until after the Insured Claimant shall have recovered its loss. (b)The Company's right of subrogation includes the rights of the Insured to indemnities. guaranties, other policies of insurance, or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions Conyrin lit American Land Title Ass rxiatlnn. All riphtsreseiverl.Thou:evI this FOnni,i-,liirtcato ALT%: Id ALTAI nem Lars in 1,]000 slan6iny s of trip oat? of Use. =..11 ,trier uses ife GroniCliCC. F.eFrinteC tine?r lirenez trorn the 4mericar. Land Title-�sc�iat�on. ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06) contained in those instruments that address subrogation rights. 14. ARBITRATION Either the Company or the Insured may demand that the claim or controversy shall be submitted to arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Land Title Association (''Rules"). Except as provided in the Rules, there shall be no joinder or consolidation with claims or controversies of other persons. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Insured arising cut of or relating to this policy. any service in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision, or to any other controversy or claim arising out of the transaction giving rise to this policy. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $2,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules shall be binding upon the parties. Judgment upon the award rendered by the At may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT (a) This policy together with all endorser,ents, if any, attached to it by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the Insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage that arises out of the status of the Title or by any action asserting such claim shall be restricted to this policy. (c) Any amendment of or endorsement to this policy must be in writing and authenticated by an authorized person. or expressly incorporated by Schedule A of this policy. (d) Each endorsement to this policy issued at any time is made a part of this policy and is subject to all of its terms and provisions. Except as the endorsement expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsement, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. 16. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision of this policy. in whole or in part, is held invalid or unenlorceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision or such part held to be invalid, but all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. CHOICE OF LAW; FORUM ja)Choice of Law: The Insured acknowledges the Company has underwritten the risks covered by this policy and determined the premium charged therefor in reliance upon the law affecting interests in real property and applicable to the interpretation, rights, remedies, or enforcement of policies of title insurance of the jurisdiction where the Land is located. Therefore, the court or an arbitrator shall apply the law of the jurisdiction where the Land is located to determine the validity of claims against the Title that are adverse to the Insured and to interpret and enforce the terms of this policy. In neither case shall the court or arbitrator apply its conflicts of law principles to determine the applicable law. (b)Choice of Forum: Any litigation or other proceeding brought by the Insured against the Company must be filed only in a state or federal court within the United States of America or its territories having appropriate jurisdiction. 18. NOTICES, WHERE SENT Any notice of claim and any other notice or statement in writing required to be given to the Company. under this policy must be given to the Company at 35001881h St. SW, Suite 300, Lynnwood, WA 98037. CuDvriq I It Am—ican L,nnd TRAP As6ociatinn. All riphtc rns Po ved_The u.Q Of III is FOfrr, i; r?srrir.[er. to :•1 T%, Iican,,ges -,w! ALTFi ,rc lt,:-is ii, • �• .. 9%qJ st.an,:m,g .:,� Oi the date of use. =dl Culler tr.es .ne" h;L Ito FeFrinted under licbnse Irdiii thr. Land rule sr� ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17106) SCHEDULE A Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 3500 188th St. SW, Suite 300 Lynnwood, WA 98037 File Number._. 100705W Policy Number. 27-031-06-100705645 Address Reference. 11XXX S. 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA98023 Amountof Insurance:.$402.500-00 Premium: $ 933:00 Date of Policy: November 18, 2010 at 03:08 PM 1. Name of Insured: FEDERAL Wi4Y MISSION GHURGH, a Washington non profit corporation 2. The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title is vested in: Federal Way Mission Church, a Washington non profit corporation 4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: SEE SCHEDULE C ATTACHED HERETO Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: Terry Sarver, Chief Tale Officer ALTA Owner's Pollcy Schedule A (GM 7/06J (100705Fi45.PFC1It00745645P22) Fidelity National Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE B File Number: 100705645 Policy Number: 27-031-06-100705645 EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, or claiming possession, not shown by the Public Records. 2. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstances affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 3. Easements, prescriptive rights, rights -of -way, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lied, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Taxes or special assessments which are not yet payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the Public Records. 6. Any lien for service, installation, connection, maintenance, tap, capacity, or construction or similar charges for sewer, water, electricity, natural gas or other utilities. or for garbage collection and disposal not shown by the Public Records. 7. Unpatented mining claims, and all rights relating thereto. 8. Reservations and exceptions in United States Patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. 10. Water rights, claims or title to water. 11. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any. created, first appearing in the Public Records, or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. ALTA Owner's Policy (100705645.PFD/100705645/22) Schedule B (6117106) SCHEDULE B (Continued) File Number. 100705645 Policy dumber. 27-031-06-100705645 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. General and special taxes and charges, payable February 15, delinquent if first half unpaid on May 1., second half delinquent if unpaid on November 1 of the tax year (amounts do not include interest and penalties): Year: 2010 Tax Account Number: 082104-9057-06 Levy Code: 1205 Assessed Value -Land: $98.000.00 General and Special Taxes: Billed: $1,213.32 Paid: $1,213.32 Unpaid, $0.00 2. Any rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of survey, Recording Date: May 13, 2005 Recording No.: 20050513900005 3. Agreement: Executed by: Lakehaven utility District and Pool Brothers Conshvctiom L.L.C. Recording Date: November 20, 2007 Recording No.: 20071120000459 Regarding: Domestic sewer and water service 4. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts and fills upon said premises as granted by Deed: Recording No.: 8606030359 ALTA Owners Policy Schedule 816117/06) (10D705645.PFD/100705645/22) SCHEDULE C File Number: 100705645 Policy Number: 27-031-06-100705645 The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: That portion of the South half of the Northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at a point 30 feet North and 500.41 feet West of the Southeast corner of the West half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 8; THENCE. West on the North line of the French Lake County Road, 165 feet; THENCE North at right angles to said North line, 630 feet; THENCE East, parallel to the North line of said road, 154.61 feet to the Southwesterly line of Buenna County Road; THENCE South 37 ° 01 'East along said Southwesterly line 17.46 feet; THENCE South 616.22 feet to the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed to King County by Deed recorded under Recording No. 8606030359; AND EXCEPT that portion quieted in King County Cause No. 02-2-19282-3, described as follows: That portion of the West half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 8, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington lying within the following boundaries: Beginning at a point 455.0 feet North and 500.41 feet West, as measured along and right angle to the South line thereof, from the Southeast comer of the West half to the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 8; THENCE North 01 ' 05 ' 35 " East at right angle to said South line 205.00 feet to the North line of the South 660.00 feet of said subdivision; THENCE South 07 a 29' 11 " West 68.30 feet; THENCE South 02 ° 04 ' 30 " East 137.61 feet to the point of beginning. ALTA Owners Policy Schedule C (100705645.PFD/100705645122) alak" CITY 40PNNW�- OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 RCEIVy 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 �"` www.cioffederalwpy.com APR ® 6 2012 "ffY OF FEDERAL, WAY CDS ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 43.21 C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions. For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Mission Church Parking Lot Expansion 2. Name of applicant: Brian Kim 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 3600611' Ave SW 355t1i PL Federal Way Washington, 98023 Phone A. 253-332-625 Name: Brian Kim (bkdesign66@gmail.com) 4. Date checklist prepared: March 26, 2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Permit Process: 6 months Grading: 1 month Construction: 2 month 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. i 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Site Plan, Preliminary Engineering Plan, Preliminary Landscape Plan, Level I Downstream Study, Preliminary TIR, Traffic Analysis, Geotechnical Study 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Federal Way: Land Use Process IV, Clear and Grade Permit, 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page Construction of a parking lot, containing approximately 130 parking stalls, on 2.34 acres of land. The parking lot will support services for Mission Church. The property is located along the north side of South 312`h Street near the intersection with 44 Avenue South. The parking lot and associated landscaping would cover the entire property. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project address is 345 South 312`h Street, Federal Way. The property is located on the north side of South 312`h Street, across the streetfrom the intersection with a Avenue South. The western boundary of the property would be approximately the a Avenue South centerline, ifprojected. The property is approximately 165 feet wide by 615 feet long. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one)® rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 45% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, mulch)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gravelly sand which is mapped as Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgQ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Cut: 1,400 CY Fill. 6,900 CY Preliminary grading of the parking lot was established to minimize the cut below the stormwater infiltration vault. If additional geotechnical work shows the depth of infiltrative soils and groundwater is deeper, the bottom of vault elevation can be lowered. This would help achieve a more balanced earthwork volume because the parking lot grading could more closely follow the existing ground elevation. The source offill has not been determined f. Could erosion occur as, a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, erosion could occur during the site grading phase of this project. Soils mapped on this property exhibit relatively high infiltration rates, which greatly reduces the probability of erosion during site clearing The riskfor erosion problems on this property would be considered low. T__ll.a:. �lACA lL�—L •lA •lAl•l T___'f _C 1'f 1_.\TT_1___a \T___M__—�_1 /"�L__1_l...a g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 78% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. An erosion control plan will be prepared showing Best Management Practices that include installation of a construction entrance, shows limit of clearing, requires installation of interceptor swales that direct stormwater runoff to sediment traps and species ground cover practices during the site work f Mr a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Emissions during construction will include exhaust from construction equipment and dust from clearing and grading work. Construction equipment will meet state vehicle emission standards. Water will be used when necessary to reduce dust during site work. After completion of construction there will be automobile emissions normally associated with a parking lot. No additional measure will be required b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. Water will be applied to graded areas to reduce dust emissions, if necessary. 3. WATER a. Surface. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. M 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. _1`10 1__\TT__�__y\T___--_--a..l 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Mto] 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. MO b. Ground. 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Yes, stormwater runofffrom the parking lot will be infiltrated in accordance with the current drainage design guidelines. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged to the ground. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. stormwater runoffwill be generated from the impervious pavement used to surface the parking lot. The parking lot surface will be stoped to drain to catch basins that collect the runoff. Underground pipes will convey the runoff to a stormwater vault that provides water quality treatment and retention volume. Stormwater runoff will be infiltrated, so no discharged is planned for downstream receiving waters 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Yes, an accidental fluid spill within the parking lot could enter the groundwater through the storm infiltration system. The most like cause for waste material entering the storm system would be a vehicle accident_ The waste material generated from a vehicle accident would most likely be antifreeze or motor oil. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. The storm drainage system will be design to meet the 2009 King County Storm Water Design uncn .--I 1A �Al� n___ c _too 1__\TT._�__s �T.______— -I f Manual Standards, as adopted by City of Federal Way. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. x_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other x_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plant: water lily, eelgrass, milfail, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing site is a second growth forest with a mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees. Site grading will likely require removal of nearly all existing vegetation on the 2.4 acre site. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. A landscape plan meeting City of Federal Way design standards will be prepared to address perimeter and internal landscape requirements. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None, beyond that provided by the parking lot landscaping. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric energy will be required to power the internal parking lot lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. [rto c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. Parking lot lights will have photosensitive controls that limit periods of use. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. None. b. Noise. 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise will be created during site work operations. The hours of work will be limited to those allowed by City Ordinances. After completion of the parking lot there will be normal vehicle noise. Hours of noise after completion of the parking lot will vary depending on events. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current site is an undeveloped property. Adjacentproperties have single family dwellings. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? WO e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RS7.2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not Available g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? UM h. Has any part of the site been classified as an environmentally critical area? If so, specify. M i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any. Parking lot setbacks and landscape planting will be provided. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. None. �nGn l A___L I notn n___ 0 _P l0 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? View for adjacentproperties will be more open. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. Landscape planting will be included in the parking lot design. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Standard parking lot lightingfixtures will illuminate the parking lot at night. Light will also be produced with vehicular circulation within the parking lot during night time events. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. Perimeter landscape plating will provide a buffer for adjacent properties. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. TT.ai...:_ �ncn w.t___t •+� •+nTa n___ n _c �o L.1TT__A___a_1 T)___:—,._�__a_1 nt__i_i:... No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nation, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The site is fronted by the South 312`h Street along the southern boundary. South 312`h Street will be the primary access for the parking lot. The existing right-of-way is fully built out with curb, gutter, sidewalk east/west through lanes and center turn lane. The proposed driveway locations are shown on the site plan. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will create approximately 130 new parking spaces, none will be eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. M an&^ --_t use nn" n___ in _r- f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See Traffic Engineering Report g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. See Traffic Engineering Report 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electrici natura g ater refuse service a ephon sanitary sew , septic system, other (p ease list) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrical power will be required for onsite parking lot lighting Only minimal construction trenching will be required to install the power conduit. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. . X SIGNATURE: DATE SUBMITI ED: 2 O n__n �:_ uncn 1A___L �lA nn�� n___ >> _r�o i__�rr__�...t-�n_..:-----__.•_e ia__i_c.� D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the proposal, of the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, and if they are likely to affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Water will be used for irrigation for landscape area only. Federal Way Mission Church rents adjacent vacant lot for parking space from St. Luke Church. We do not expect any increase for any emissions to air, production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise since same volume of traffic was generated. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases: Fences all around property will provide residential appearance, controlled landscape in the property will be increased visual aesthetic, and parking lot lighting will provide security of the area. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? M0 Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life: We will save the trees in the landscape area as many as possible to conserve the existing trees. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy of natural resources? None. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources: None. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally critical areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? None. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts: None. T__lla_ �An A L!--- L — nnl� 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans. No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and utilities? MO Proposed measures to reduce of respond to such demands: No. 7. Identify, if possible, whellier the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None. rl..n �"A lAi� n___ Io _ell 1--I*r—J...w�r.__1......--s:.i HEATH. & ASSOCIATES, INC Transportation and Civil Engineering FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN AND PARKING ANALYSIS FEDERAL GVAY, YVA l 4VI®IV— Prepared for. Federal Way Mission Church c/o Brian Kiln BK Design. 36006 11"' Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98023 Revised December 2012 RESUBMITTED DEC 12 2012 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup WA 98371 (253) 770 1401 Fax (253) 770 1473 heatlitraftic.com FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN AND PARKING ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Project Description ............................................. II. Methods of Analysis .......................................... III. Determine Average Vehicle Occupancy (AVO) IV. Parking Demand ................................................. V. Parking Management ......................................... VI. Traffic & Pedestrian Movement From Lot ........ VII. Conclusions........................................................ VIII. Recommendations .............................................. APPENDIX Parking Lot Site Plan Weekly Church Activity and Attendance Table ITE Parking Generation 4th Edition Data ..3 .........................................................3 .............................. .........................3 ..................................................... I ...4 ........................................... . ...... 5 .................................................. 5 ........................................... ..........6 .........................................................7 2 FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN AND PARKING ANALYSIS I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Federal Way Mission Church is a currently operating church located at 405 S 312th Street, parcel 0821049221 in the city of Federal Way. It is currently comprised of one main building of 19,727 square feet, with an associated 70 stall parking lot with accesses onto 4th Avenue S and S 312th Street. The church schedule on Sunday begins roughly at 8:00 AM and ends at 12:45 PM, and includes 3 main services. The weekday schedule typically consists of morning prayers, with evening prayers also scheduled on Wednesdays. The proposed plan is to add a new parking lot of approximately 190 stalls on parcel 0821049057 on the north side of the existing church lot, on the other side of S 312th Street. New buildings are not a part of the project at this time. A site plan of this lot is attached. This expansion would be predicated on securing the necessary permits as required by Federal Way in a form that meets the city's requirements. The current use has been determined by the church and includes the number of participants based on the building usage for each day of the week and the time of day. The uses have been further defined below. H. METHODS OF ANALYSIS The city of Federal Way requires the use of several types of analysis when looking at parking requirements. The methods to be reviewed are as follows: 1. Use Projected Attendees 2. Use ITE Parking Generation methodologies III. DETERMINE A VERA GE VEHICLE OCCUPANCY (AVO) For a church use, one method is to use the expected occupancy of the vehicles in conjunction with the number of attendees during maximum sei vice times in order to determine the number of parking spaces. The occupant load of a building can be fixed, thereby allowing for the calculation of the number of parking stalls to serve the church. This information can be analyzed with modifications applicable to the Federal Way Mission Church in order to better estimate the needed parking once the new sanctuary is fully occupied. The city of Federal Way recommends the use of ITE Parking Generation data along with data from other sites. Several sites with the same size magnitude as the Federal Way Mission Church were analyzed for vehicle occupancy based on samples of cars entering onto their respective sites. Exhibit A provides information on the AVO as noted. Along with ITE data, the churches reviewed included the following: A. ITE Parking Generation - Use to determine AVO A review of ITE Parking Generation 4th Edition for Land Use Code 560, Church, indicates that peak parking demand on a Sunday is 0.45 vehicles per attendee which equates to 2.2 occupants per vehicle. The information from ITE is contained in the appendix. B. Christian Faith Center This project, located on SR 99 and S 336th Street in Federal Way, was extensively reviewed for traffic impacts and parking requirements. Based on the data presented as part of that project the AVO used in the analysis was 2.5 occupants per vehicle. C. Estimated AVO for Federal Way Mission Church Based on the above information, the estimated AVO for the Federal Way Mission Church is 2.3 occupants per vehicle for a more conservative analysis. Note that this AVO is for the Sunday peak period. Weekday church activities are expected to have much lower attendance but also with lower AVO values. Still, the highest overall parking demand would be during the Sunday services. IV. PARKING DEMAND Several methods of determining parking demand for the existing Church use are presented below. Method I Parking Demand - Use Projected Attendees The use times and current and projected attendance for the various weekly events at the building are attached in a table. The maximum parking needs on the site will take place during Sunday morning church services with lesser usage needed at other times of the week. A weekday morning peak of 40 people (25 cars), and a evening peak of 70 people (45 cars), may be expected. This evening peak church activity would occur- after- the typical 4-6 PM peak hour of adjacent traffic. The worst case is expected to occur for the service at 11:30 AM to 12:45 PM on Sundays with 170 attendees. The operation of the church provides for everyone to meet together and then a breakout to Sunday school occurs. Assuming the 170 attendees and a 2.3 AVO requires that 74 stalls be provided to serve the church based on the existing attendance. Method 2 Parking Demand - Use ITE Parking Generation This ITE methodology recognizes several independent variables including seats, attendees and square footage. Use Number of Seats The worship area has bench seating. Assuming 18" of bench per seat, the total number of seats comes to 320 in the worship area. The peak parking demand as determined by ITE is 0.2 vehicles per seat which is the average rate. The parking requirements using this method is therefore calculated to be 64 stalls. Using the 85th percentile of ITE yields 0.25 vehicles per seat which calculates to 80 stalls. A fitted curve is not provided for this variable due to the scattered data. 2. Use Number of Attendees The highest attended service, from 11:30 AM to 12:45 PM, typically has approximately 170 attendees. The peak parking demand using average rates is 0.45 vehicles per attendee and therefore the parking calculates out to 170 x 0.45 = 77 stalls using this methodology. Using the fitted equation under this scenario calculates the parking to be 80 stalls. Assuming the 85th percentile of 0.6 vehicles per attendee the number would calculate to 102 stalls. 3. Use Total Square Footage of Buildings The total building area of the site is 19,727 square feet. The peak parking demand based on rates is 8.37 vehicles per 1,000 square feet. The number of parking stalls would therefore be 19.727 x 8.37 = 165 stalls. By using the 85th percentile under this listing the rate of 14.38 vehicles per 1,000 square feet gross floor area would calculate to 284 stalls. The data is scattered such that a fitted curve isn't calculated. V. PARKING MANAGEMENT The Federal Way Mission Church personnel would commit to keeping the parking lot clear of long term parking and use by others not associated with the activities on the site. The site would not lend itself to this activity as most area establishments have their own off-street parking. Control of parking and direction across the street could also be provided by the church leadership in the form of announcements and reminders to direct attendees as to parking functions and any other guidance that might be needed such as encouraging their members to ride share. VI. TRAFFIC & PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT FROM LOT Location of the proposed parking lot is on the north side of 312th Street S, across the street from the church site. 312th Street S has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. According to AASHTO standards, a 40 mph design speed has a minimum entering sight distance (ESD) of 445 feet and a minimum stopping sight distance (SSD) of 305 feet. Measurements at the east access point, for exiting traffic, indicate ESD and SSD to the east are both well in excess of 500 feet. ESD to the west is in excess of 500 feet, with SSD to the west at approximately 500 feet. There is a crest and sag vertical curvature to the west, however 3.5 foot objects would remain in sight throughout this curvature.. Field review at the west access point, to align with 4th Ave S, indicates that ESD and SSD exceeds the minimum requirements. ESD and SSD to the west are greater than 500 feet, ESD to the east is greater than 500 feet, and SSD to the east is approximately 500 feet. Some trees and vegetation are currently a minor hindrance but would be removed as a part of development. Note that as the west access is to be for entering traffic only (exiting the traffic stream), the ESD requirement at this location (relating to entering the traffic stream) would not apply. Refer to the Traffic Impact Analysis for applicable sight distance photos and a diagram. Pedestrians would be required to cross the street from the parking lot to the church. In order to facilitate this movement, a painted crosswalk with pedestrian signage is to be added. Crosswalk location would be to the east of the parking lot. The crosswalk will include a center refuge island per Federal Way drawing # 3-58. Push button flashing pedestrian lights would be added as an additional safety measure. Another possibility to enhance safety could be to have personnel stationed to assist with pedestrian crossing during the peak Sunday times. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of 312th Street S. A pedestrian pathway from the sidewalk on the south side of the street leading into the church site should be added to facilitate pedestrian traffic. VIT CONCL USIONS The several methods of analysis yield the following results as summarized below, with recommended calculations for consideration in bold: Method 1 - 170 Attendees and 2.2 AVO = 77 Stalls Method 1 - 170 Attendees and 2.5 AVO = 68 Stalls Method 1 - 170 Attendees and 2.3 AVO = 74 Stalls Method 2A - ITE Number of Seats = 64 Stalls (rates) Method 2A - ITE Number of Seats = 80 Stalls (rates) 85th percentile Method 2B - ITE Number of Attendees = 77 Stalls (rates) and 80 Stalls (equation) Method 2B - ITE Number of Attendees = 102 Stalls (rates) 85th percentile Method 2C - ITE Square Footage = 165 Stalls (rates) Method 2C - ITE Square Footage = 284 Stalls (rates) 85th percentile Given the many ways that churches can operate and thereby control the number attendees, Method 1 could provide the basis of parking demand for this church. The number of stalls using this method would be up to 139 stalls if 100 percent attendance needs to be considered. A more realistic need is assuming the effective maximum for churches which is 90 percent of maximum attendance or 125 stalls. The ITE calculations are for generic churches and no knowledge is available as to how the churches in the data pool operate or what their specific demographics are. Calculating the number of parking stalls using the 85th percentile of the ITE analysis, the average for attendees and seats results in a conservative approach to typical Sunday peak parking demand. Using the average of the three methods, the estimated minimum required number of stalls is therefore calculated as follows: (74 stalls + 80 stalls + 102 stalls)/3 = 85 stalls required for the church Current site plans shows approximately 70 existing stalls for the main church lot, plus 190 proposed stalls for the new lot, for a combined total of 260 stalls. The existing plus proposed parking for the Federal Way Mission Church therefore will provide adequate parking for existing needs plus additional capacity for future growth. VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. A crosswalk should be added across the S 312th Street to the east of the new parking lot accesses. Pedestrian signage and a center extruded curb island are to be included. 2. Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon System pedestrian flashers, by Spot Devices at the pedestrian crosswalk. Construction would be to City of Federal Way standards, and would be pending review and approval of the City. 3. If deemed necessary, provide attendants to direct pedestrians crossing S 312th Street during the peak Sunday times between services. If the need is to direct traffic in the public right of way certified flaggers should be used. 4. Provide a pedestrian path from the sidewalk on S 312th Street to the church building. FEDERAL WAY MISSION CHURCH TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN AND PARKING ANALYSIS APPENDIX 9EBE-2EE(E93) :9a° z60i-9E9(E9Z) :'tvv9d EZOBB voI6vpCVay '6yy fa,epeg''rLTJJ m AI[ BOOB\✓IS1z aA00MYR000GNOMCM9'9Y71-9 AS -Y h ymny� uulssryV 6eh\ Ie�apa3 aaualp Z C—J z p wil E0036 VN'AIM h-Pd W»IS IPZI E 4fnn5 SOb � C.,� i } 31VO xL�'�'N' sBu191h3N aWyLS wd °01B >tre NOISNVdXH 101 JNMVd HOIUM NOISSIW JInJJ 31tl0 0MS :NMtltlO I r ' i o l _ — V 9 r.+ d301OH30V1d 1X31 Remark Hour Mon Tues Wens Thur Fri Morning Prayers 6:00 am — 8:00 am 40 people 40 people 40 people 40 people 40 people 25 cars 25 cars 25 cars 25 cars 25 cars Evening Prayers 7:30 pm — 9:00 pm 70 people 145 cars Sunday ,8:00 am — 9:30 am 100 people ,9:45 am — 11:15 am 130 people 11:30 am — 12:45 pm 170 people 10 Land Use: 560 Church Description A church is a building in which public worship services are held. A church houses an assembly hall or sanctuary; it may also house meeting rooms, classrooms and, occasionally, dining, catering, or party facilities. Synagogue (Land Use 561) and mosque (Land Use 562) are related uses. Database Description The database consisted of all suburban sites with the exception of one urban site. Parking demand at the urban site was similar to that of the suburban sites and, therefore, the data were combined and analyzed together. • Average site density: 28 square feet (sq. ft.) gross floor area GFA per seat (seven sites). • Average parking supply ratios: 0.3 spaces per seat (12 study sites), 0.7 spaces per attendee (nine study sites) and 11.3 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA (11 study sites). Parking demand data were collected from study sites primarily during the months of October and November. The wide variation in parking demand rates based on building GFA may be due to variations in the congregation size per development unit, provision of meeting rooms, classrooms and residence space in addition to worship space in some facilities. Limited data were available for parking demand on weekdays at houses of worship with primary services on Sunday. At one site, a weekday parking demand rate of 0.01 vehicles per seat was reported for the hour beginning at 6:00 p.m. At another site, a weekday parking demand rate of 1.17 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA was reported for the hour beginning at 10:00 a.m. A third site reported a weekday parking demand rate of 6.41 vehicles per 1,000 sq_ ft. GFA for the hour beginning at 7:00 p.m. These variations in weekday and weekday evening parking demand can result from variations in facility use during the week from basic administration functions to preschool activities to evening committee meetings/study groups. Limited data were available for parking demand at houses of worship with primary services on days other than Sunday. • Two Seventh-Day Adventist churches were observed to have parking demand rates of 0.32 and 0.40 vehicles per attendee between 10:00 and 11:00 a.m. on a Saturday during services with 78 and 105 attendees, respectively. Future studies should include weekday data that encompass group activities (such as, youth groups, study groups, retreats) as well as base employee data. It is also important to collect attendance data for the survey days. institute of Transportation Engineers 1 1 Parking Generalion, 4th Edition r' g [ 1571 Land Use: 560 Church Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs. 1,000 sq. ft. GFA On a: Sunday Statistic _ Peak Period Peak Period De.ma- 3: .m. 00 9:00 a.m.-1:00 .m.; 7:00-8 Number of Stud Sites 12 Avers a Size of Study Sites Avers a Peak Period Parking Demand 13,200 sq- ft. GFA 8.37 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Standard Deviation 5.63 Coefficient of Variation Range 67% 1.82-16.94 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 85th Percentile 14.38 vehicl Der 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 33rd Percentile 3.88 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Sunday Peak Period Parking Demand 350 300 250 > 200 - 150 a 100 - u 50 a 0 • 0 10 • • 20 30 40 x = 1,000 sq. ft. GFA • Actual Data Points t institute of Transportation Engineers of `4�^R [ Parking Generation, 4th Edition 159 i .r 1. F Land Use: 560 Church Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs. Seats On a: Sunday Statistic Peak Period Demand Peak Period 9:00 a.m.-1:00 .m.; 7:00-8:00 p.m. Number of Study Sites 12 Average Size of Study Sites 388 seats Average Peak Period Parking Demand 0.20 vehicles per seat Standard Deviation 0.15 Coefficient of Variation 77% Range 0.03-0.65 vehicles per seat 85th Percentile 0.25 vehicles per seat 33rd Percentile 0.14 vehicles per seat to 300 250 200 -a 150 m 'L 100 a 50 W Sunday Peak Period Parking Demand 0 200 400 600 x ® Seats Institute of Transportation Engineers o Actual Data Points _i 800 1,000 1,200 13 Parking Generation, 4th Edition [ 161 Land Ilse: 560 Church Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs. Attendees On a: Sunday Statis#fo Peak Period Peak Period Demand 9:00 a.m.-1:00 .m.; 7:00-8:00 .m. Number of Study Sites 17 age Size of Study Sites 356 attendees Average Peak Period Parking Demand Standard Deviation E45 vehicles per attendee 0.17 Coefficient of Variation Range 38% 0.12-0.71 vehicles per attendee 85th Percentile 33rd Percentile 0.60 vehicles per attendee 0.42 vehicles per attendee N 800 700 t 600 j 500 400 300 a 200 u 100 a 0 Sunday Peak Period Parking Demand 0 500 1,000 1,500 x = Attendees • Actual Data Points -- Fitted Curve 2,000 - - - - Average Rate ] 4 parking Generation, 4th Edition Institute of Transportation Engineers