Loading...
05-100807CITY OF � Federal March 10, 2005 Albert Desantis Architects BCRA 2106 Pacific Avenue Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98402 FILE CITY HALL Wa 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Y Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com RE: Permit #05-100807-000-00-UP; WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL 33455 6111 Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Desantis: On February 22, 2005, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received the Use Process III and Stale Environmental PolieyAct (SEPA) applications for a proposed medical office at the above -referenced address. Based on the development application submittal requirements established in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-33, your Process III application has been deemed incomplete as of today's date, March 10, 2005. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION The following items were identified as missing from the application. In order to consider the application complete and ready for review, the following items must be addressed: Title report. Wetland report and delineation. Hazardous Materials Inventory Checklist. This is a requirement based on a recent code amendment (not in place at time of your preapplication meeting) related to. critical aquifer recharge areas (CARA) within which the site is located. The checklist allows us to identify if there are hazardous materials associated with the proposed use, in sufficient quantity, to warrant regulatory measures per state law. Please submit two copies of the above -referenced items. After receipt of the requested information listed above, we will notify you within 14 calendar days whether your application is complete, or if incomplete, what information is still needed to complete the application. It is important to note that staff cannot formally begin processing your application until all items are submitted. I can be reached at 253-835-2643 should you have any questions about this application. Sincereli, Isaac Conlen Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form c; Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Scott Sproul, Acting Assistant Building Official Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department Hazardous Materials Inventory Checklist Sarady Long, Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Doc, LD. 30854 05-100807 A�kCITY OF Federal Way February 28, 2006 Med Pro, LLC 21011 26"' Street Court East Sumner, WA 98390 RE: Permit #05-100807-00-UP; WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL 33455 61h Avenue South Dear Mr. Dunham: CITY HALL LL ._. 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway. com The City of Federal Way has completed the administrative review and hereby issues approval of the proposal to construct a 20,670 square -foot medical office building with associated storage parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. The site plan submitted on November 23, 2005, landscaping plan submitted on February 22, 2006, and elevations submitted October 13, 2005, are hereby approved per the enclosed Findings for Project Approval. Additional requirements may be provided as City departments review the building permit. REVIEW PROCESSES REQUIRED The site is located in an Office Park (OP) zoning district. The medical office use is permitted in this zone subject to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-826, and is reviewed through the Process Ill, Project Approval, process when SEPA review is required. Project approval does not grant license to begin any type of site work. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION The applicant must submit to the City a complete building permit application for the development activity, within one year after the final decision on the matter, or the decision becomes void. The applicant must substantially complete construction for the development activity within five years after the final decision of the City, or the decision becomes void. An extension may be granted, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-409, through a written request submitted to the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718), at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the decision. Any person who received a copy of this decision may appeal this decision. The appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Department of Community Development Services (address above), and be accompanied by the established fee, within 14 calendar days after the effective date of the decision. The effective date of decision is February 27, 2006. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusions of the Director of Community Development disputed by the person filing the appeal. This decision shall not waive compliance with City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Also, be advised that various performance and maintenance bonds may be required for the project. Any bonds or other agreements as required must be completed prior to issuance of any related construction permits. A cash deposit may also be required to cover the City's potential expenses, if Mr. Dunham February 28, 2006 Page 2 necessary, for obtaining and using the proceeds of any bond. The cash deposit will be refunded following satisfactory completion of all bond requirements. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please call Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner, at 253- 835-2643. Sincerely, e � � / "I KaYMCCh ung,Director Community Development Services enc: Findings for Project Approval Approved Site Plan, resubmitted 11/23/05 Approved Landscape Plan, resubmitted 2/22/06 c: A] De Santis, BCRA Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst Greg Brozek, South King Fire and Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 05-100807 Doc. I.D. 33779 4%L o, Fed0:�� eral Way FINDINGS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL BUILDING File No: 05-100807-00-UP Related File No: 05-100808-00-SE FILE The following are findings for recommending approval of the proposed West Campus Medical Building located at 33455 6 h Avenue South, Federal Way. Project Description The applicant proposes construction of a 20,670 square -foot medical office building with associated storage parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. Zoning for the subject site is Office Park (OP). The OP zoning district permits medical offices pursuant to FWCC Section 22-826, subject to Process III, Project Approval when SEPA is required. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) designation for the subject site is Office Park. 2. The subject site is a 2.72-acre unimproved lot located at 33455 6"' Avenue South, in the City of Federal Way. The site is vegetated with evergreen trees and underbrush. The adjacent uses and zones are as follows: North: Windermere real estate office, zoned Office Park (OP) South: Parking lot and office building, zoned OP East: Vacant lot, zoned OP West: Office buildings, zoned OP 3. The responsible official of the City of Federal Way issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on January 11, 2006, pursuant to SEPA (File #05-100808-00-SE). The comment period ended on January 25, 2006, pursuant to the optional DNS process, with no written comments received. The appeal period for the determination was completed on February 8, 2006, with no appeals filed. The Final Staff Evaluation for the Environmental Checklist, Federal Way File 05- 100808-00-SE, is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. 4. No environmentally sensitive areas were identified on the subject site; however, a Category II wetland is located northwest of the site and a portion of this wetland's buffer encroaches on the northwest portion of the subject property. No disturbance of the wetland buffer is proposed for this project. The proposed building meets the setback requirements of FWCC Sections 22-826, including 35-foot front yard setback and 20-foot side and rear yard setbacks. No maximum lot coverage is established. Drainage components conform to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and'City amendments. Flow control will be provided offsite in Lake #3 of the West Campus Office Park D. Water quality will conform to the requirements set forth for a Resource Stream Protection area in the KCSWDM. The facilities will be provided onsite through the means of a biofiltration swale and a StormFilter vault. Required frontage improvements to 6`l Avenue South shall be as noted below. The applicant shall construct half -street right-of-way improvements on the frontage along 6a' Avenue South corresponding to Federal Way roadway section "R'. This roadway section requires a 40-foot-wide paved street with vertical curbs, four -foot planter strip, six-foot sidewalk, three- foot utility strip, street lighting, and street trees all within a 66-foot right-of-way. The applicant submitted a Right -of -Way Modification Request on December 4, 2004 (City File 04- 104949-SM). The request was granted on December 20, 2004, and subsequently extended on January 4, 2006, subject to the following: The required street improvements will be modified to include only a streetlight and street trees to be placed behind the sidewalk. The applicant must dedicate a three -foot -wide, strip along the property frontage for right-of-way and execute a No Protest Local Improvement District (LID) Covenant in the event that a future lid is formed to make street improvements. 8. Required improvements to the private access road along the south side of the property shall be as noted below. The private access road along the south side of the property must be improved to current City's standard. At a minimum, the required improvements shall consist of a 28-foot paved surface with vertical curb, four -foot planter strip, with five-foot sidewalk, and streetlights along the north side of this private access road. The applicant submitted a Right -of -Way Modification Request on July 13, 2005 (City File 05- 103519-SM). The request was granted on July 25, 2005, subject to the following: • The four -foot planter strip requirement may be eliminated. • A five -foot -wide sidewalk is still required along the south property line, adjacent to the existing access road. • Streetlights are required at: (a) the intersection of the access road and along 6'' Avenue South per City Development Standards, and (b) the intersection of the southern driveway connection to the access road in conjunction with the parking lot lighting. Streetlights shall be placed behind the sidewalk. (FWCC 22-1497.2) The applicant must grant additional easement width along the south side of the property to accommodate the required improvements. (FWCC 22-1474.e) 9. The minimum parking requirement for the proposed use in the OP zone is one stall for every 300 square feet of gross floor area, or 69 parking stalls for a 20,670 square -foot building. 71 parking stalls, including four accessible spaces, are provided. Stalls and drive aisles meet the City's dimensional requirements. 10. Maximum building height for the proposed use in the OP zone is 55 feet. The approved elevations indicate the building will be well under the maximum allowable building height. Findings for Project Approval File No: 05-100807-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 33792 West Campus Medical Building Page 2 11. The trash enclosure meets code requirements in that it is screened, with a solid enclosure made of materials that match the building. Additionally, landscaping is provided on the east, west, and south sides. 12. Proposed rooftop mechanical equipment is located in roof -wells, which entirely screen the equipment from view. 13. Site and architectural design is consistent with FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines," based on provision of the following key design elements: Site Design a. FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(1) states primary building entrances should be visible from the right-of-way. The applicant indicates due to security concerns the building cannot satisfy this requirement. The applicant proposes a number of design features to compensate. A staff entrance/exit with associated plaza area is located at the intersection of 6`h Avenue South and the private drive bordering the south side of the site. Additionally, the L-shaped building with entrance on the inside oriented towards parking allows the building to screen views of parking from the street. b. The entrance to the building is connected to the public sidewalk by a separate paved route delineated by concrete paving and separated from driving areas by landscaping, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(2). C. Site lighting elements are shielded to prevent spillage onto adjacent properties, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(g)(1). Building Design a. The building meets the facade modulation and screening options for all elevations longer than 60 feet and visible from a right-of-way or residential use. Two of four options must be incorporated into each elevation. On the subject site this provision is applicable to the south and east elevation. South elevation — The applicant proposes a combination of: 1) facade modulation, 2) landscaping, 3) plaza, and 4) trellises. Two trellises are provided along the front of the building. The trellises are intended to substitute for canopies, which do not fit with this type of facade. The elevation includes 9 modulations (3 would be required on a facade of this length), many of which exceed the minimum requirement of two feet in depth. A 250 sf plaza (200 sf required by code) is proposed at the corner of the building facing the public ROW. Lastly, foundation landscaping ranging between 4' and 10' in width is proposed along the facade. The combination of all four elements satisfies and exceeds code requirements pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(b). 2. East elevation — The applicant proposes a combination of: 1) facade modulation, 2) landscaping, 3) plaza, and 4) trellises. Two trellises are provided along the front of the building. The trellises are intended to substitute for canopies, which do not fit with this type of facade. The elevation includes 6 modulations (2 would be required on a facade of this length), many of which exceed the minimum requirement of two feet in depth. A 250 sf plaza (200 sf required by code) is proposed at the corner of the building facing the public ROW. Lastly, foundation Findings for Project Approval West Campus Medical Building File No: 05-100807-00-UP / Doe. I.D. 33792 -Page 3 landscaping ranging between 4' and 10' in width is proposed along the fagade. The combination of all four elements satisfies and exceeds code requirements pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(b). b. The proposed building incorporates the following articulation elements pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(c): windows w/ trim, overhangs, indentations, varied rooflines, trellises, and material and color variations. The proposed site layout and building design meets the intent of community design guidelines. 14. FWCC Section 22-1566(h) calls for 10 feet of Type III landscaping along the east and south property lines, and five feet of Type III landscaping along all other property lines. The approved landscape plan resubmitted February 22, 2006, shows ten feet of Type III landscaping along the east and south property lines respectively, abutting the public right-of-way and access easement. The plan shows five feet of Type III landscaping along the north and west property lines. Per code, 1,562 square feet of Type IV landscaping is required within the parking lot. The applicant proposes 1,660 square feet. All proposed parking lot landscape plants are drought tolerant, thus satisfying the requirements of FWCC Section 22-1564(f). Landscaping islands are located at the end of all parking rows. 15. 128 significant trees exist on -site. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(c)(1)(a), 25 percent (32 trees) of the total must be retained. The applicant proposes to retain 37 significant trees. 16. The site layout and building design are found to be consistent with CPTED principles. 17. The applicant submitted a completed Hazardous Materials Inventory Checklist. Hazardous materials are not indicated to be stored on the site. 18. The proposed site plan application, elevations, and attachments have been determined to be consistent with the FWCP, with all applicable provisions of the FWCC, and with the public health, safety, and welfare. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal, and the proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. The proposed development is consistent with Process III, Project Approval, decisional criteria required under FWCC Section 22-395(b). Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations and other applicable City requirements. This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner Date: February 23, 2006 Findings for Project Approval File No: 05-100807-00-UP / Doc. I.n. 33792 West Campus Medical Building Page 4 CITY OF Federal Way DATE: January 4, 2006 MEMORANDUM Public Works Department TO: Isaac Conlen FROM: Sean Wells, P. . SUBJECT: WEST CAMPU L - (05-100807-00-UP) 33455 6TH AVE S - Public Works Technical Comments #3 We have reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for West Campus Medical date stamped received November 23, 2005, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and are as follows: Preliminary Engineerijag and Landsca a Plans: 1. Neither the landscaping plan or the site plan submitted account for the required street trees or illumination along 6th Ave. S. (with or without the changes listed in the Road Modification). Street Trees and Illumination are required per city codes and the December 2004 Road Modification. Please show them on the plan and state that the final amount and location shall be determined at the time of building permit submittal. 2. The Landscaping plan shows the landscaping buffer along 6th Ave. S. extending into the existing right-of-way. It does not account for the required 3-foot right-of-way dedication. The landscaping strip should be measured from the future right-of-way line. Please make this change to the plans (this would be a good time to include the required street trees). 3. The locations listed an the landscape plan marked as "Entry Signage" may conflict with sight distance for the driveways. Consequently, their locations cannot be approved at this time. A sight distance analysis will be required with the building permit submittal to determine acceptable locations for the signage. CIT Federal Way FINDINGS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL BUILDING File No: 05-100807-00-UP Related File No: 05-100808-00-SE The following are findings for recommending approval of the proposed West Campus Medical Building located at 33455 6`" Avenue South, Federal Way. Project Description The applicant proposes construction of a 20,670 square -foot medical office building with associated storage parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. Zoning for the subject site is Office Park (OP). The OP zoning district permits medical offices pursuant to FWCC Section 22-826, subject to Process Ill, Project Approval when SEPA is required. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) designation for the subject site is Office Park. The subject site is a 2.72-acre unimproved lot located at 33455 6`" Avenue South, in the City of Federal Way. The site is vegetated with evergreen trees and underbrush. The adjacent uses and zones are as follows: North: Windermere real estate office, zoned Office Park (OP) South: Parking lot and office building, zoned OP East: Vacant lot, zoned OP West: Office buildings, zoned OP The responsible official of the City of Federal Way issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on January 11, 2006, pursuant to SEPA (File #05-100808-00-SE). The comment period ended on January 25, 2006, pursuant to the optional DNS process, with no written comments received. The appeal period for the determination was completed on February 8, 2006, with no appeals filed. The Final Staff Evaluation for the Environmental Checklist, Federal Way File 05- 100808-00-SE, is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. 4. No environmentally sensitive areas were identified on the subject site; however, a Category II wetland is located northwest of the site and a portion of this wetland's buffer encroaches on the northwest portion of the subject property. No disturbance of the wetland buffer is proposed for this project. The proposed building meets the setback requirements of FWCC Sections 22-826, including 35-foot front yard setback and 20-foot side and rear yard setbacks. No maximum lot coverage is established. 6. Drainage components conform to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City amendments. Flow control will be provided offsite in Lake #3 of the West Campus Office Park D. Water quality will conform to the requirements set forth for a Resource Stream Protection area in the KCSWDM. The facilities will be provided onsite through the means of a biofiltration swale and a StormFilter vault. 7. Required frontage improvements to 6t" Avenue South shall be as noted below. The applicant shall construct half -street right-of-way improvements on the frontage along 6"' Avenue South corresponding to Federal Way roadway section "R". This roadway section requires a 40-foot-wide paved street with vertical curbs, four -foot planter strip, six-foot sidewalk, three- foot utility strip, street lighting, and street trees all within a 66-foot right-of-way. The applicant submitted a Right -of -Way Modification Request on December 4, 2004 (City File 04- 104949-SM). The request was granted on December 20, 2004, and subsequently extended on January 4, 2006, subject to the following: The required street improvements will be modified to include only a streetlight and street trees to be placed behind the sidewalk. The applicant must dedicate a three -foot -wide strip along the property frontage for right-of-way and execute a No Protest Local Improvement District (LID) Covenant in the event that a future lid is formed to make street improvements. 8. Required improvements to the private access road along the south side of the property shall be as noted below. The private access road along the south side of the property must be improved to current City's standard. At a minimum, the required improvements shall consist of a 28-foot paved surface with vertical curb, four -foot planter strip, with five-foot sidewalk, and streetlights along the north side of this private access road. The applicant submitted a Right -of -Way Modification Request on July 13, 2005 (City File 05- 103519-SM). The request was granted on July 25, 2005, subject to the following: • The four -foot planter strip requirement may be eliminated. • A five -foot -wide sidewalk is still required along the south property line, adjacent to the existing access road. Is Streetlights are required at: (a) the intersection of the access road and along 6"' Avenue South per City Development Standards, and (b) the intersection of the southern driveway connection to the access road in conjunction with the parking lot lighting. Streetlights shall be placed behind the sidewalk. (FWCC 22-1497.2) • The applicant must grant additional easement,width along the south side of the property to accommodate the required improvements. (FWCC 22-1474.e) 9. The minimum parking requirement for the proposed use in the OP zone is one stall for every 300 square feet of gross floor area, or 69 parking stalls for a 20,670 square -foot building. 71 parking stalls, including four accessible spaces, are provided. Stalls and drive aisles meet the City's dimensional requirements. 10. Maximum building height for the proposed use in the OP zone is 55 feet. The approved elevations indicate the building will be well under the maximum allowable building height. Findings for Project Approval File No: 05-100807-00-UP / Doc I.D. 33792 West Campus Medical Building Page 2 11. The trash enclosure meets code requirements in that it is screened, with a solid enclosure made of materials that match the building. Additionally, landscaping is provided on the east, west, and south sides. 12. Proposed rooftop mechanical equipment is located in roof -wells, which entirely screen the equipment from view. 13. Site and architectural design is consistent with FWCC Chapter 22, Article XIX, "Community Design Guidelines," based on provision of the following key design elements: Site Design a. FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(1) states primary building entrances should be visible from the right-of-way. The applicant indicates due to security concerns the building cannot satisfy this requirement. The applicant proposes a number of design features to compensate. A staff entrance/exit with associated plaza area is located at the intersection of 6 b Avenue South and the private drive bordering the south side of the site. Additionally, the L-shaped building with entrance on the inside oriented towards parking allows the building to screen views of parking from the street. b. The entrance to the building is connected to the public sidewalk by a separate paved route delineated by concrete paving and separated from driving areas by landscaping, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(2). C. Site lighting elements are shielded to prevent spillage onto adjacent properties, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(g)(1). Building Design a. The building meets the fagade modulation and screening options for all elevations longer than 60 feet and visible from a right-of-way or residential use. Two of four options must be incorporated into each elevation. On the subject site this provision is applicable to the south and east elevation. 1. South elevation — The applicant proposes a combination of: 1) facade modulation, 2) landscaping, 3) plaza, and 4) trellises. Two trellises are provided along the front of the building. The trellises are intended to substitute for canopies, which do not fit with this type of facade. The elevation includes 9 modulations (3 would be required on a facade of this length), many of which exceed the minimum requirement of two feet in depth. A 250 sf plaza (200 sf required by code) is proposed at the corner of the building facing the public ROW. Lastly, foundation landscaping ranging between 4' and 10' in width is proposed along the facade. The combination of all four elements satisfies and exceeds'code requirements pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(b). 2. East elevation — The applicant proposes a combination of 1) facade modulation, 2) landscaping, 3) plaza, and 4) trellises. Two trellises are provided along the front of the building. The trellises are intended to substitute for canopies, which do not fit with this type of facade. The elevation includes 6 modulations (2 would be required on a facade of this length), many of which exceed the minimum requirement of two feet in depth. A 250 sf plaza (200 sf required by code) is proposed at the corner of the building facing the public ROW. Lastly, foundation Findings for Project Approval File No: 05-100807-00-UP / Doc I.D. 33792 West Campus Medical Building Page 3 landscaping ranging between 4' and 10' in width is proposed along the fagade. The combination of all four elements satisfies and exceeds code requirements pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(b). b. The proposed building incorporates the following articulation elements pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(c): windows w/ trim, overhangs, indentations, varied rooflines, trellises, and material and color variations. The proposed site layout and building design meets the intent of community design guidelines. 14. FWCC Section 22-1566(h) calls for 10 feet of Type III landscaping along the east and south property lines, and five feet of Type III landscaping along all other property lines. The approved landscape plan resubmitted February 22, 2006, shows ten feet of Type III landscaping along the east and south property lines respectively, abutting the public right-of-way and access easement. The plan shows five feet of Type III landscaping along the north and west property lines. Per code, 1,562 square feet of Type IV landscaping is required within the parking lot. The applicant proposes 1,660 square feet. All proposed parking lot landscape plants are drought tolerant, thus satisfying the requirements of FWCC Section 22-1564(f). Landscaping islands are located at the end of all parking rows. 15. 128 significant trees exist on -site. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(c)(1)(a), 25 percent (32 trees) of the total must be retained. The applicant proposes to retain 37 significant trees. 16. The site layout and building design are found to be consistent with CPTED principles. 17. The applicant submitted a completed Hazardous Materials Inventory Checklist. Hazardous materials are not indicated to be stored on the site. 18. The proposed site plan application, elevations, and attachments have been determined to be consistent with the FWCP, with all applicable provisions of the FWCC, and with the public health, safety, and welfare. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal, and the proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. The proposed development is consistent with Process III, Project Approval, decisional criteria required under FWCC Section 22-395(b). Final construction drawings will be reviewed for compliance with specific regulations and other applicable City requirements. This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner Date: February 23, 2006 Findings for Project Approval File No: 05-100807-00-UP / Doc I D 33792 West Campus Medical Building Page 4 CITY OF Federal Way DATE: February 22, 2006 TO: Isaac Conlen FROM: Sean Wells, P. . ��D SUB3ECT: WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL - (05-100807-00-UP) 33455 6TH AVE S - Public Works Approval MEMORANDUM Public Works Department We have reviewed the above land use proposal and find the concept supportable in its approach to civil site development. These comments are based on a review of the Preliminary Drainage Report and Preliminary Engineering Plans stamped received November 23, 2005, and the Preliminary Landscape Plans stamped received February 22, 2006 to the city of Federal Way. Development Services accepts the concepts contained in this preliminary submittal and recommends land use approval. FILE 1�kCITY OF Federal Way November 4, 2005 Albert de Santis Architects BCRA 2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98402 RE: Permit #05-100807-000-00-UP; WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL 33455 6th Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. de Santis: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederafway.com The Planning Division has completed a second review of the above -referenced application. Comments from the initial review have been addressed satisfactorily for the most part. Please respond to the following comments. Site and General Requirements 1. Continue working with Rob Van Orsow, Solid Waste & Recycling Coordinator, to determine an optimum location and orientation for the garbage and recycling enclosure. 2. Is the previously shown perimeter fencing no longer proposed? 3. Please confirm that the drainage lines north and west of the site are existing (not clear on revised site plan). Landscaping 4. There are no shrubs shown in the south landscaping area west of the driveway on the revised landscaping plan. Please add shrubs. Also, the item referred to as 8-RM is indicated but not shown. Community Design Guidelines 5. Your proposal to utilize a combination of measures including building modulation, foundation landscaping, linear trellises and plaza, to meet the fagade modulation and screening provision of FWCC Section 22- 1635(b), is generally acceptable. The plaza, however, lacks visually interesting components (see definitions, FWCC Section 22-1633). Please provide some visually interesting elements in this feature such as decorative or contrasting pavement. Please provide a cover letter that responds to the above comments as well as the comments contained in the enclosed memo from Sean Wells, Development Services Division. Comments from the City's Traffic Division will be forwarded when complete under separate cover. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 253-835-2643 or by email at isaac.conlen@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, ,,& Isaac Conlen Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form c: Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Sean Wells Review Memo Sarady Long, Traffic Engineer 05-100907 Doc I.D. 33729 CITY OF Federal allay DATE: November 3, 2005 TO: Isaac Conlen FROM: Sean Wells, P.E. — -- MEMORANDUM Public Works Department SUBJECT: WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL - (05-100807-00-UP) 33455 6TH AVE S - Public Works Technical Comments #2 We have reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for West Campus Medical date stamped received October 13, 2005, and found items that need to be addressed prior to receiving preliminary approval from Development Services. These items are in accordance with Chapters 21 and 22 of the Federal Way City Code and the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual, and are as follows: Preliminary Engineering Plans: 1. The sheets submitted (A1.01, A7.01, A7.021-1.01, L1.02, C1, and C2) do not address the following comments from my June 14th memo: a. Impervious area b. Existing abutting streets, including name, width, and existing improvements c. Existing utilities: water, sewer, storm, fire hydrants, phone, overhead and underground power, gas, cable, etc. (valves still shown on C1 & C2 not identified.) d. Three-foot Right -of -Way dedication along 61h Ave. S. (not shown on the plans. Setbacks must be taken from the future right-of-way line, not the current line.) 2. Provide the analysis done to verify that the turning movements are adequate for the dumpster enclosure access. 3. Show the dimension of the east driveway. 4. The gate on the east driveway needs to be set back 20 feet from the future right-of-way line. 5. The proposed sidewalk west of the south driveway appears to be outside of the existing access easement. Either move the sidewalk location so that is within the easement, or show that an additional access easement will be granted for the sidewalk facility. 6. A new catch basin south of the proposed building location will need to be installed in the future gutter line to collect drainage from the access easement. 7. The TIR states that the roof drains will bypass the stormfilter vault, however, the plans show the roof drains connecting into the stormfilter vault. Please verify and correct this apparent discrepancy. 8. The angle of the pipe coming into the bio-swale needs to be less than 90 degrees to the flow of the swale itself. Preliminary TIR: 1. PE Stamp is required. It may be marked PRELIMINARY if desired, or signed/sealed. 2. Downstream Analysis — Page 6: The last sentence is not correct. The downstream analysis is not being required because the City has sufficient data and information on Lake 1, obtained through the SWM Comprehensive Plan and the CIP analysis. 3. Section 5 — Page 6: Describe that the offsite drainage collected from the adjacent driveway currently does not receive any water quality treatment, and will not receive any water quality treatment in the post -developed project conditions. 1 -0' o ,l 1. 5f 6 55 FILE CITY OF �. Federal Way May 13, 2005 Albert de Santis Architects BCRA 2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98402 RE: Permit #05-100807-000-00-UP; WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL 33455 6h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. de Santis: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com The Planning Division has completed an initial review of the above -referenced application and has the following comments. In addition to comments below, please see enclosed redline drawing. Review comments from Public Works will be forwarded when complete. Site and General Requirements 1. The building satisfies setback requirements. 2. The building satisfies height requirements. 3. The garbage and recycling enclosure must include a minimum of 65 square feet of space for recyclables. Landscaping around trash enclosure meets code requirements. Please coordinate with refuse service provider (Waste Management) to ensure configuration is acceptable for refuse truck access. 4. Please show all easements referenced in the title report on the site plan (if location known). Landscaping 5. Ten feet of Type III landscaping (rather than five feet) is required abutting access easements (on south side). 6. Landscaping on the east side should include planter strip (located directly west of sidewalk) and 10- foot Type III landscape strip west of planter strip. The submitted drawing shows the 10-foot Type III buffer as well as additional clustered plantings but does not show the planter strip. I need this configuration clarified to complete review of landscaping requirements on this portion of the site. 7. A minimum of 25 percent of planting materials must be drought tolerant. All planting material within parking lot landscaping islands shall be drought tolerant. Please indicate on landscape plan. 8. Shrubs located in Type III landscape buffer must be a minimum of 24 inches in height at time of planting. Please indicate on plan. Nk dcSanlis May 13, 2005 Page 2 9. Planter islands separating head -to -head parking stalls shall be a minimum of eight feet in width. The planting island in the middle of the parking area is approximately four feet wide. Please revise. 10. Please show calculations for square footage of parking lot landscaping on landscape plan rather than site plan. 11. Groundcover is required in all perimeter landscaped areas (not shown on north side). 12. At some point we will need some additional information or second sheet added to the landscape plan showing planting details, tree and shrub sizes, etc. Parking 13. Proposed parking configuration meets code requirements, with regard to number of stalls and dimensions. 14. Please label compact parking stalls on site plan. Wetlands 15. Pursuant to the submitted wetland delineation and report prepared by Talasaea Consultants, a Category II wetland is located northwest of the site. A portion of the wetland's 100-foot buffer is located on site. No improvements are proposed within the wetland buffer. Please modify the notes on the drawing to refer to the 100-foot buffer (rather than setback) and eliminate reference to the 15- foot buffer (which is not required). Community Design Guidelines 16. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(1) pedestrian walkways from sidewalks to entrances should be provided. A pedestrian pathway connecting to the building entrance should be provided adjacent to the south driveway (if sidewalk is installed along this frontage). FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(2) states pedestrian walkways should be protected from abutting vehicular circulation areas with landscaping. Walkways adjacent to each driveway should be separated from driveways by vegetation (see redline). 17. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1635(b) elevations visible from a right-of-way shall incorporate two of the four modulation/screening elements (fagade modulation, landscape screening, canopy or arcade, or pedestrian plaza). This provision applies to the south and east building elevations. Both of these elevations incorporate modulation as one of the required elements. It is not clear what the second proposed modulation/screening element is. Landscaping is shown along the base of each elevation; however, the proposed landscaping is not adequate to meet code requirements in terms of width or type of plantings. Type II landscaping eight feet in width is required. In the area of doors and windows, Type IV landscaping may be substituted for Type II. If another option is proposed, please explain. 18. Please provide an elevation detail of the accessory storage building. The storage building should be similar to the main building with regard to materials and architecture. Federal Way Fire Department Comments 19. All gates in fire apparatus access roadways shall be set back a minimum of 30 feet from the intersecting roadway. 05-100807 Doc ID 31381 Mr. deSantis May 13, 2005 Page 3 Please provide a cover letter that responds to the above comments. Return redlines with resubmittal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 253-835-2643 or by email at isaac.conlen@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Isaac Conlen Associate Planner enc: Redline Drawing Resubmittal Form Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Greg Fewins, Deputy Director Community Development Sarady Long, Traffic Engineer Scott Sproul, Acting Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 05-100807 Doc. I.D. 31381 T 41k CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.ciivoffederalwoy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1,:::1] hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: X Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ge-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 5 2005. Project Name C- File Number(s) - /d 6g0 7 - (3 Signature Date y--)S -D S K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 12/22/2004 3:19 PM OTY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: West Campus Medical Description: Applicant proposes construction of a 20,800 square -foot medical office building. Applicant proposes associated storage building, parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. Applicant: Pro Medical LLC, 21011 26t' Street Court East, Sumner, WA 98390 Location: 33455 6 h Avenue South, Federal Way Date Application Received: February 22, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: April 27, 2005 Date Determined Complete: April 18, 2005 Comment Due Date: May 11, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Process III Approval (File #05-100807-00-UP), Environmental Review (File #05-100808-00-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Anticipated Environmental Determination: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is anticipated that a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) will be issued for the proposed project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197- 11-355 is being used. It is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection" and Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including FWCC zoning and subdivision codes, environmental protection, and surface and stormwater management codes; the King County Surface Water Design Manual and Road Standards; and the Uniform Building, Fire, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes. City Contact: Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner, 253-835-2643 The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the environmental and land use applications to the Director of. Community Development Services by May 11, 2005. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 27, 2005. 05-100807 Doc. I.D 31070 Map Date: April 21st, 2005 of City of TaxLot 926500 - 0340 City Box971ralWay GIs Division P.O. Box 718 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way y p Federal Way 000 98063 -VlClnit Ma - c206,-635-7 W W W.cityoffederalway.com ARE +�\► + *r1�,♦fir : 4�+�♦ �+i r Subject Site L Legend King county Tax Lots 0 Taxlot : 926500 - 0340 Q N 0 250 500 1,000 Feet f t I I I CITY OF Federal Way This map Is Intended for use as a graphical representation only. The ON of Federal Wav makes no warranty as to its accuraw. Page 1 of Tamara Fix - Legal Notices From: Tamara Fix To: admin@fedwaymirror.com Date: 4/25/2005 9:11 AM Subject: Legal Notices CC: dgrigg@soundpublishing.com Please publish the following legal notice (West Campus Medical NOA, 05-100807) in Wednesday's (April 27, 2005) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you, Tamara Fix Administrative Assistant City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 253-835-2602 f e c e e g of c e g e M,,1RR"n_)R Your Community Newspaper - Affidavit of Publication Debbie Kaufman, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-885 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 27th day of April, 2005 , and ending on the 27th day of April, 2005 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 1 12.88 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 4th day of May, 2005. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way :'qg NOTARY can: •��fi,���OFW n G1�1���.�`�` 1414 SO.324TH STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 0 253-925-5565 0 FAX: 253-925-5750 office building. Appli- icant adverse impact comments on the envi- cant proposes associ- on the environment ronmental and land ated storage building, and an Environmental use applications to the parking, landscaping, Impact Statement Director of Commu- and other site improve- (EIS) will not be re- nity Development Ser- ments. quired I under vices by May 11, 2005. Appllcant:Pro Med- R C W Only persons who sub- ical LLC, 21011 26th 43.21 C.030(2)(c). mit written documents Street Court East, Development Regu- to the Director of Com- Sumner, WA 98390 lations to be Used for munity Development Location:33455 6th Project Mitigation, Services, or specifical- Avenue South, Feder- Known at this Time: ly requests a copy of al Way Federal Way City the original decision, Date Application Re- Code (FWCC) Chap- may appeal the Direc- ceived:February 22, ter 18, "Environmental tor's decision. 2005 Date of Notice Protection" and Chap- FWM#-885 of Application: April ter22, "Zoning" Published April 27, 27, 2005 Consistency with 2005 Date Determined Applicable City Complete:April 18; P I a n s 2005 Comment Due and Regulations: Date: May 11, 2005 The project will be re - Permits Required by viewed for consistency this Application: Pro- with all applicable cess III Approval (File codes and regulations, #05-100807-00-UP), including FWCC zon- Environmental Review ing and subdivision (File #05-100808-00- codes, environmental SE) protection, and sur- Relevant Environ- face and stormwater mental Documents management codes; are Available at the the King County Sur - Address Below: X face Water Design Yes No Manual and Road Anticipated Environ- S t a n d a r d s; mental Determina- and the Uniform Build- tion: Based upon re- ing, Fire, Plumbing view of a completed and Mechanical environmental check- Codes. list and other informa- City Contact: Isaac tion on file with the City, Conlen, Associate it is anticipated that a Planner, 253-835- Determi-nation of Non- 2643 sigriiicance (DNS) will The official project file !NOTICE OF LAND be issued for the pro- is available for public USE APPLICATION posed project. The op- review at the Depart- Name:West Campus tional DNS process in meat" of Community Medical WAC 197.11-355 is Development Services Description:Appli- being used. It is likely (33325 8th Avenue cant proposes con- that the City of Federal South, PO Box 9718, struclion of a 20,800 Way will determine Federal Way, WA square -foot medical that the project will not 98063-9718). Any per - have a probable signif- son may submit written :A9�_ CITY OF 4413044� Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: West Campus Medical Description: Applicant proposes construction of a 20,800 square -foot medical office building. Applicant proposes associated storage building, parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. Applicant: Pro Medical LLC, 21011 26t` Street Court East, Sumner, WA 98390 Location: 33455 6 h Avenue South, Federal Way Date Application Received: February 22, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: April 27, 2005 Date Determined Complete: April 18, 2005 Comment Due Date: May 11, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Process III Approval (File #05-100807-00-UP), Environmental Review (File #05-100808-00-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes _ No Anticipated Environmental Determination: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is anticipated that a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) will be issued for the proposed project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197- 11-355 is being used. It is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.2 1 C.03 0(2)(c). Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, `Environmental Protection" and Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including FWCC zoning and subdivision codes, environmental protection, and surface and stormwater management codes; the King County Surface Water Design Manual and Road Standards; and the Uniform Building, Fire, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes. City Contact: Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner, 253-835-2643 The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the environmental and land use applications to the Director of. Community Development Services by May 11, 200.5. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 27, 2005. 05-100807 Doc I D.31070 Map Date: April 21st, 2005 on City �� City of Federal Way TaxLot 926500 - 0340 33325ilhA P.O. Box 9716 33325 Bfh Ave S. Federal Way We. 96063 F6drerbl Way —Vicinity Map- (206)-835_7000 www.cityoffederalway.com �� N g3 t N Cl) a UA a N 321 Q" S 328 ST Q S 329 PL S.7ona� LN Legend A King County Tax Lots N Taxlot : 926500 - 0340 0 250 500 1,000 Feet rl- 6 344 L" [ITY ❑F Federal Way This map is Intended frr use as a graphical representation only. The city of Federal wav makes no warranty as to Its accuracv. CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www. it offederalwa .Corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, 7�" � Q Vk--2 V" hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or to or at each of the attached addresses on L2,� 2005. #Posted 2-0 J Project Name i S -:- File Number(s) 0080 UPZ DS- CV'?08 —,SiE Signature Date ql� 0� K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribulion.doc/Last printed 04/26/20D5 1:41 PM 4111 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.c!tyoffederalwoy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I,-S� c hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed 2005. ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or 521posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 33y55 6T�l AVM Project Name _ ��� 5- (�'_-,A M. U M I C /V - File Number(s) C95 - l 00go-7 -0 P, Signature o Z5 -- / Od eo g - -5 Date 4��7 K:\CD Administration Wes\Dedorofion of Distribution.doc/Last printed 4/27/2005 2:56 PM CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, trot a: F Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Xmoiled ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2005. Project Name File Number(s) b 5 4052 7- U (D - - SE Signature Date 9 -.)6 --0 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 12/22/2004 3:19 PM 0TY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: West Campus Medical Description: Applicant proposes construction of a 20,800 square -foot medical office building. Applicant proposes associated storage building, parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. Applicant: Pro Medical LLC, 21011 26'h Street Court East, Sumner, WA 98390 Location: 33455 6t' Avenue South, Federal Way Date Application Received: February 22, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: April 27, 2005 Date Determined Complete: April 18, 2005 Comment Due Date: May 11, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Process III Approval (File #05-100807-00-UP), Environmental Review (File #05-100808-00-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes _ No Anticipated Environmental Determination: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is anticipated that a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) will be issued for the proposed project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197- 11-355 is being used. It is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.2 1 C.03 0(2)(c). Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection" and Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including FWCC zoning and subdivision codes, environmental protection, and surface and stormwater management codes; the King County Surface Water Design Manual and Road Standards; and the Uniform Building, Fire, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes. City Contact: Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner, 253-835-2643 The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8 h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the environmental and land use applications to the Director of. Community Development Services by May 11, 200.5. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 27, 2005. 05-100807 Doc ID 31070 Map Date: April 21st, 2005 sion City o f City of Federal Way GIs TaxLot 926500 - u340 333'25 thA P.O. Box 9718 33325 eth Ave S. Federal Way We- 98063 Federal Way -Vicinity Map, (206)-835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com r CT a `?25, Ib' r ST :�: 7� in S 321 N N � a .AL 8G'p �[ r� d COV "I PL � S 328 � T 3210- ���' �� '°C� �J_!`,' C ¢tom Cl) S 328 ST Q s33a S 329 PL 53 v�3Q_5�r 533W S 33A PL Q� ,yR S3� � 5 S Q`- 3•��` • 161 L � yL Sr 3 ST Legend 0 King County Tax Lots Taxlot : 926500 - 0340 a v S 344 NCITY OF Federal Way 0 250 500 1,000 Feet This map Is Intended for use as a gaphical representation only. The Citv of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its eccuracv. FEMA US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS JOE HENRY REGION 10 NTH DIV ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC 130 228T" ST SW PO BOX 3755 935 POWELL AVE SW BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 SEATTLE WA 98124 RENTON WA 98055 EPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC 1200 6T" AVE MD-126 SEATTLE WA 98101 DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 PLANNING/OPERATIONS MANAGER JAMEY TAYLOR SNO-KING AREA DNR SEPA CENTER WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 47015 PO BOX 330310 MS 240 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 JULIE STOFEL WDFW REGION 4 OFFICE 16018 MILL CREEK BLVD MILL CREEK WA 98012 US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVCE 510 DESMOND DR SE #102 LAC EY WA 98503 PORT OF TACOMA ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT PO BOX 1837 TACOMA WA 98401-1837 SHIRLEY MARROQUIN KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT MS KSC-NR-0505 201 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 MARK CARY LAND US SVC KCDDES 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055-1219 WA STATE DEPT WILDLIFE 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091 TRAVIS NELSON WDFW PO BOX 73254 PUYALLUP WA 98373 DOH - DIV OF DRINKING WATER ENV DOCUMENTS REVIEWER PO BOX 47822 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7822 PORT OF SEATTLE PO BOX 1209 SEATTLE WA 98111 GARY KRIEDT KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 201 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 SOUTH KING COUNTY REGIONAL WATER ASSOCIATION 27224 144T" AVE SE KENT WA 98042 WSDOT ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PO BOX 47331 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 WA NATURAL HERITAGE DNR PO BOX 47014 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 RANDY PEARSON WASH STATE PARKS PO BOX 42668 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2668 LARRY FISHER WDFW 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091 PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 110 UNION ST STE 500 SEATTLE WA 98101-2038 PSRC GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT 1011 WESTERN AVE #500 SEATTLE WA 98104-1040 PERRY WEINBERG SOUND TRANSIT 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-2826 KING COUNTY PARKS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PO BOX 3517 REDMOND WA 98073-3517 KC BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ROD HANSEN SOLID WASTE DIV SEATTLE/KING COUNTY 810 THIRD AVE STE 608 KING CO DEPT OF NATURAL RES DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SEATTLE WA 98104-1693 201 S JACKSON ST STE 701 1404 CENTRAL AVE S STE 101 SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 KENT WA 98032 KING CO ROADS DIVISION COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER 155 MONROE AVE NE RENTON WA 98056 FW FD 31617 1ITAVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 COMCAST CABLE STORE 1414 324T" S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PUYALLUP TRIBE 1850 E ALEXANDER AVE TACOMA WA 98421-4105 PIERCE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 3629 S "D" ST TACOMA WA 98408 PLANNING & CD DEPT CITY OF AUBURN 25 W MAIN ST AUBURN WA 98001 KENT CITY HALL PLANNING DEPT 220 4T" AVE S KENT WA 98032 NE TAC NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL C/O JAMES COLBURN TACOMA ECONOMIC DEV 747 MARKET ST RM 900 TACOMA WA 98402-3793 CRAIG GIBSON TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES PO BOX 11007 TACOMA WA 98411 GERI WALKER FWSD 31405 18T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PO BOX 3440 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE PLANNING DEPT 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2401 S 35T" ST TACOMA WA 98409-7460 PIERCE COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD 2401 S 35T" ST TACOMA WA 98409 CITY CLERK PACIFIC CITY HALL 100 THIRD AVE SE PACIFIC WA 98047 CITY OF TACOMA BLUS LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR 747 MARKET ST STE 345 TACOMA WA 98402-3769 MARION WEED CHAIR NORTHEAST TACOMA NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL 4735 NE 42ND ST TACOMA WA 98422 CITY OF LAKEWOOD 10510 GRAVELLY LK DR SW STE 206 LAKEWOOD WA 98499-5013 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL PO BOX 1877 AUBURN WA 98071 PUYALLUP INTERNATIONAL 3600 PT OF TACOMA RD STE 110 TACOMA WA 98424-1040 PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER 2401 S 35T" ST TACOMA WA 98409-7460 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT 915 FOURTH NE AUBURN WA 98002 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ALGONA CITY HALL 402 WARDE ST ALGONA WA 98001-8505 JOE ELTRICH TACOMA WATER DIVISION PO BOX 11007 TACOMA WA 98411 HAYES ALEXANDER PLNG CHAIR NORTHEAST TACOMA NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL 5308 RIDGE DR NE TACOMA WA 98422 CITY OF MILTON 1000 LAUREL ST MILTON WA 98354 CITY OF SEATAC CITY OF DES MOINES CITY OF NORMANDY PARK 4800 S 188T" ST 21630 11T" AVE S 801 SW 174T" ST SEATAC WA 98188 DES MOINES WA 98198 NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 CITY OF BURIEN CITY OF FIFE TERRY LUKENS CITY HALL TH 5411 23RD ST E BELLEVUE COUNCIL OFFICE 415 SW 150 ST FIFE WA 98424 PO BOX 90012 BURIEN WA 98166-1957 BELLEVUE WA 98009-9012 WATER DISTRICT #54 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT 922 S 219T" ST PO BOX 3867 PO BOX 3487 DES MOINES WA 98198-6392 KENT WA 98032-0367 KENT WA 98032 WATER DISTRICT #111 COVINGTON WATER DISTRICT PAT PROUSE 27224 144T" AVE SE 18631 SE 300T" 1600QWE7 PL T" AVE RM 120E KENT WA 98042-9058 KENT WA 98042-9208 S EAT SEATTLE WA 98121 PAUL ALEXANDER MARY AUSBURN JILL GASTON REALTY SPEC METRO TRANSIT PSE BPA KSC-TR-0413 6905 S 228T" ST SKC-SVC 914 AVE "D" 201 S JACKSON ST KENT WA 98032 SNOHOMISH WA 98290 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 WASH ENVIRON COUNCIL CHRIS CARREL TIM PAYNE 615 2ND AVE STE 380 FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS PIERCE COUNTY TRANSIT SEATTLE WA 98104-2245 PO BOX 24971 PO BOX 99070 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 LAKEWOOD WA 98499 SAM PACE LEAGUE -OF WOMEN VOTERS FW COMMUNITY COUNCIL SEA/KING CO ASSOC/REALTORS OF SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 4274 29839 154T" AVE SE 800 SW 152ND FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 KENT WA 98042-4557 SEATTLE WA 9816E MICHAEL FELDMAN ATTN NEWSROOM AVIATION PLANNING SEATAC WASH STATE OCD TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE PO BOX 68727 901 COLUMBIA ST SW 1950 S STATE ST SEATTLE WA 98168-0727 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8300 TACOMA WA 98405 JACK HOPKIN.S LISA PEMBERTON-BUTLER LEE BEDARD SEATTLE PI SEATTLE TIMES NORTH FEDERAL WAY NEWS 101 ELLIOTT AVE W 1200 112T" AVE NE STE C145 133 SW 153RD ST SEATTLE WA 98121 BELLEVUE WA 98004-3748 BURIEN WA 98166 ERICA JAHN SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL JOHN KIM FEDERAL WAY MIRROR KOREA POST 1414 S 324T" STE B-210 PO BOX 130 28815 PACIFIC HWY S STE 4B FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KENT WA 98035-0130 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KING COUNTY ASSESSORS KATHY REED CITY OF EDGEWOOD 500 4T" AVE RM 700 OLYMPIC PIPELINE CO 2221 MERIDIAN AVE E SEATTLE WA 98104 2319 LIND AVE SW EDGEWOOD WA 98371-1010 RENTON WA 98055 CRESTVIEW SHORECLUB ASSN MHACC MIRROR LK RESIDENTS ASSN 4817 SW 310T" C/O WI TL�IAM HICKS 525 SW 312T" ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 29219 7 PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 NORTH LAKE COMNTY CLUB WEST GREEN CONDO ASSN REDONDO COMMUNITY CLUB 33228 38T" AVE S 432 S 321 ST PL PO BOX 5118 AUBURN WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 REDONDO WA 98054 STEEL LK RESIDENTS ASSN BARCLAY PLACE HOA BELMOR PARK HOA 2329 S 304T" ST 1034 SW 334T" 2101 S 324T" ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BELLACARINO WOODS HOA BELLRIDGE TOWNHOMES HOA CAMPUS GLEN HOA 35204 6T" AVE SW 1438 S 308T" LN 32806 6T" PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TWIN LAKES HOA MAR CHERI COMNTY CLUB BROOKLAKE COMNTY CENTER 3420 SW 320T" ST # 28 PO BOX 25281 726 S 356T" FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 KEN SHATOCK KINGSGROVE HOA GROUSE POINTE HOA TH 1911 SW CAMPUS DR # 621 261E S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAALL WAY WA 98003 Revised March 3, 2005 K:\Environmental Checklists\Ngency Mailing List.doc ' Print Map Page Page 1 of 2 % King County Parcel Map and Data az.Ss f l 0060 oa'a • `� r �02505 � . 1 - - _ .- _ _ 1. _. _ _:i'•Ri RECEIVED atla '=r:R 2 2 2005 'ITY OF FEDERAL WAY �t BUILDING DEPT. 05-1.00808 l y~ 4 DIM r' 0310 was Uii36? ; 0270 240 Parcel Number 9265000340 Address Zipcode Taxpayer PRO -MEDICAL L L C The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County:' Parcel Number-*92,-64JV0,g4Q Parcel Number t 60Q00n Address Address Zipcode Zipcode CITY OF FEDERAL FEDERAL WAY LCCA Taxpayer WAY Taxpayer ASSOCIATES LLC Parcel Number 9265000040 Parcel Number ._. 926500.0050 Address Address Zipcode WEYERHZipcode COMPANY i Taxpayer CAEUSER Taxpayer WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY COMPAN Parcel Number 599w. Parcel Number 44-R28BW250 Address 33405 8TH AV S Address 33310 1 ST WY S Zipcode Zipcode 98003 http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print—Process.asp 2/15/2005 Print Map Page Page 2 of 2 Taxpayer 1 II YERHAEUSER Taxpayer 00LUMBIA V ST P�2QP�RTtES 'T COMPANY Parcel Number %1k Parcel NumberAddress 3331S Address 600 S 334TH ST Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer COLUMBIA WEST Taxpayer DOW JONES & COMPANY PROPERTIES INC Parcel Number Parcel Number 65000350 Address 33405 6TH AV S Address 33434 1 ST WY S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer FW DEVELOPMENT Taxpayer LINCOLN RATCLIFF LLC PARTNERSHP Parcel Number Parcel Number %996,OQ0350 Address Address 33530 1 ST WY S Zipcode Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer PWEST PROPERTIES PROPER Taxpayer CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Parcel Number b3� .: ` Parcel Number Address 500 S 336TH ST Address 530 S 336TH ST Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer CAMPUS BUSINESS Taxpayer KAB HAND LLC PARKS LLC King, County_ I GIS Center I News I Services Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. hittp://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print—Process.asp 2/15/2005 CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: West Campus Medical Description: Applicant proposes construction of a 20,800 square -foot medical office building. Applicant proposes associated storage building, parking, landscaping, and other site improvements. Applicant: Pro Medical LLC, 21011 26t' Street Court East, Sumner, WA 98390 Location: 33455 6 h Avenue South, Federal Way Date Application Received: February 22, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: April 27, 2005 Date Determined Complete: April 18, 2005 Comment Due Date: May 11, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Process III Approval (File #05-100807-00-UP), Enviromnental Review (File #05-100808-00-SE) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes _ No Anticipated Environmental Determination: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is anticipated that a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) will be issued for the proposed project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197- 11-355 is being used. It is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.2 1 C.030(2)(c). Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection" and Chapter 22, "Zoning" Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including FWCC zoning and subdi'vn_sion codes, environmental protection, and surface and stormwater management codes; the King County Surface Water Design Manual and Road Standards; and the Uniform Building, Fire, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes. City Contact: Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner, 253-835-2643 The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the environmental and land use applications to the Director of. Community Development Services by May 11, 2005. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on April 27, 2005. 05-100807 Doc. I.D. 31070 Map Date: April 21st, 2005 C I t o f City iv Federal Way Y TaxLot 926500 - 0340 3 3.Division P.OBox 9718 325 Bfh Ave S. Way -Vicinity Map,- Federal Way We. 98063 Federal Way-VIciniL} IVI y Cap' (206)-835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com CT 25• r CL lr 9.A �� N r' S 32� U) Cl)a L �o.Pr_ ' F?L a N - 321 Q� T� 328 � V� S 329 PL t 33-0`S s.2onCi SS 3A PL cb S 337 N Legend 0 King County Tax Lots 0 Taxlot : 926500 - 0340 C1 �L tS C� m '9G 5 335 ST r� A N 0 250 500 1,000 Feet 4 a 0 S 344 ST, Federal Way This map is in tend ad for use as a graphical rep resen+:i lr n n n ly The ON of Fed eras War makes no warranty as to Its x.cu ru ts•. 33325 8" Avenue South PC;-3ox 9718 ederal Way, WA 98063-9718 RECEIVED BY C1�MA�UNRYDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT * * * - /-16 PBas27889 .22 $ J0.3�C FE13 18 05 4 1 S 5 MAILED FRC*A TACK :IVA 9 8 4 0 2 --T PO Box 9718 �~ leral Way, WA 98063-9718 ral Way, WA 98063-9718 MAY 0 3 2095 Columbia West Properties r 33310 1st Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel # 9265000355 C01MiY DE ELOPMEN f MAY 0 3 tun Lincoln Ratcliff Pa rtsorship 33434 Is., W 98003 Federal ,` Parc9265000 Cfttmlrry ®�v� opM�arugnpaRrM ENT MAY 0 3 2005 NIXIE 990 1 01 05/011 RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 99063971919 *0426-00143-26- 11JIIlII1Il1I„IIIII„11I1,1„III II),IIII)JII)JIII lilhil1 P08627889 5."B2g;00.TT) FED 18 05 4 16 0 VAMLED FROM TACIw- wA 9 8 4 0 2 NIXIE 990 1 01 Os/02/C RETURN TO SENDER NO SUCH NUMBER UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 9ODS3971010 X0426-00147-26-C- II,I„1111)11>>>>I1IM11)III) I)JI)iIIIIIIMI1111)1111)111 5662 $ UU.5(" FEB 18 05 4 1 5 7 MAILED FROM TAC0W wA. 98402 Campus Business Parks LLC 500 So. 336th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel # 92650( O1 05/02/ns NIXIE 330 i RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENTUNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 9DOS3971019 '!*0426-00145-26-3S 3eLVIC316, COMMU�EUEL0 pM� B DEPARTMENT MAY 0 3 2005 /LJ C - csv.,.PI r Lti F i U7 4 1 5 8 MA.LEG FROM TACOMP, !MA, 9 8 4 0 2 �f C Federal Way CCA Associates -- — - -L _ 33530'1 s'Way So. Federal Wav, WA 98003 Parcel) CITY530 9800BR937 1904 a4 04/30/C NOTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRE55 :CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PO BOA. 9718 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063-9718 COMMUNRVDEVELOP ENT by MAY 0 3 2005 City of Federal Way 335301 WA g$003 Federal Way, Parcel # 9265000360 „"ILVPMeNT pE►'AFtT�RI"!JT �Y 0 3 2005 CIT'f530 98003a937 1904 a4 64/30/ NOTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS :CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PO BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063-9718 ILL�I„I.II.... II .... II4.11"1,„I... lll►,Inulllnl1lr) +vJ L Uzi...7 � - FEB 18 05- f% 1 5 2 MAILED FR--W TACOM& WA. 9 8 4 0 2 Columbia West Properties 33310 1st Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 �= ' Parcel # 9265000255' NIXIE 900 1 01 OS/C RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNADLE TO FORWARD a n�,���{{�� DC: 98063971819 *0426-00140-� ek4f� -,Ar €3 ll)1))I))I)II))))II))))II)I)I))I)III I)III I))I)I))III IdIII I MAY ® 3 Columbia West Properties 33310 1st Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 Parry-1 # ci7Firino0950 amity Of Federal Way Community Development Services 325 8' Avenue South PO Box 9718 31 Way, WA 98063-9718 City Of Federal Way of Community Development Services 33325 0" Avenue South PO Box 9718 deral Way, WA 98063-9718 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. 600 So. 334th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel # 9265, - - -,-x 1Vf( rt �' a A a PB8627889 5,64- 00.370 ;FEE 18 05 4 15 9 MAILED FROM TACOMA, W-A 9 8 b 0 2 cq�U�� RAG E4l r RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO POF?WARD BC: 99O€a971818 *04.26-00148—.25-29 III I, I I I I I I I I I,,; I l l„I JI, I I I„I l i d) Jill I I J 11", I I I, IJI I I)„I City of Federal Way 33325 8" Ave. So. Federal Way, WA 98063 Parcel # 9264700040 tt y1r tit i'3 +r �..� PBS627`889 5662 r, 00. 70 FEB 18 05 -4 1 4 8 MAILED FROM TACOMA. WA 9 8 4 0 2 CoAfgfIIA111}' CF1 V, B A14 Y 0 2 'ReA a0 PMrUftr 2005 CITY'32S* 980052944 1704 09 04f29/OS NOTIFY SENDER OF NEW ADDRESS :CITY OF FEDERAL WAY- CITY HALL PO BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063-9718 l���n�n�i��unlluulli�iln�n�lu�llln�nnl��u���lnr� CITY OF L Federal Way April 18, 2005 Albert de Santis Architects BCRA 2106 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300 Tacoma, WA 98402 RE: Permit #05-100807-000-00-UP; WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL 33455 6`h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. de Santis: CITY HALL IFILE 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com On April 5, 2005, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received additional application material for your Use Process III application to construct a medical office at the above -referenced address. Pursuant to the development application submittal requirements established in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Sections 22-389 and18-49, the City has 14 days to determine whether your application is complete. Complete Application Pursuant to FWCC, your application is deemed complete as of Apra 18, 2005, based on the submittal requirements for State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Process III Project approval. A 120-day time -line for reviewing the project has started as of this date. The City has 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. As you are aware, the 120-day time -line may be stopped if the City determines that additional information is required to meet the requirements of the FWCC. Having met the submittal requirements, pursuant to the FWCC, a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror within 14 days, and other public notice will be given based on City procedures. Review comments will follow this correspondence. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to contact me at 253-835-2643. Sincerel , Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner c: Sarady Long, Traffic Analyst Sean Wells, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 05-100807 Doc. LD 31005 4." -2005 3:24 PM PAGE 1/009 Fax Server s'q xMINa'? MrstAmerican TRfe Insurance Company National Commercial Services 3866 South 74th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: April 05, 2005 TO: Federal Way FROM: Dean Prather ATTN: Sean Wells PHONE: (253) 671-5825 FAX NO.: 12538352709 FAX: (253) 671-5826 RE: File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Property: vacant land, Federal Way, WA Sean, Here is the updated report for Pro -Medical LLC. Please let me know if you need anything else. 253-671-5825. Thanks. 4/5r2005 3:24 PM PAGE 2/002 Fax Server Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment Face Page File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by FIRSTA MERICA N TITLE INSURANCECOMPANY First American Title Insurance Company, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue Its policy or policies of title Insurance, as Identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagor of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of the Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By -Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." First American Title Insurance Company .�`�1L4 iYs��I ti President Y srPi[rrcrz�. ,� � i � 1071 1 y 1 r�i7F Of*�*f Attest: Secretary By: Countersigned First American Title Insuranxe Company 4/ ?005 3:24 PM PAGE 3/009 Fax Server Form WA-5 (6/76) File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Commitment Page No. 1 Ar"rstAmedcan i/tfe Insurance Company National Commercial Services 3866 South 74th Street, Tacoma, WA 98409 (253) 471-1234 - FAX (253) 671-5826 Renee Richardson (253) 471-5561 renrichardson@firstam.com To: City of Federal Way via fax 253-835-2709 Federal Way, WA Attn: Sean Wells 1 2, 3 4. UPDATED REPORT SCHEDULE A Commitment Date: March 30, 2005 at 7:30 A.M. Policy or Policies to be issued: Informational Report Jann Dawson (253) 471-5591 jdawson@firstam.com File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Your Ref No.: AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX City of Federal Way $ N/A $ N/A $ N/A Proposed Insured: Pro -Medical, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company The estate or interest in the land described on Page 2 herein is Fee Simple, and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: Pro -Medical, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: The land referred to in this report is described in Exhibit A attached hereto. FiistAlmencan Title Insurance Company 4/5/2005 3:24 PM PAGE 4/009 Fax Server Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment EXHIBIT 'A' LEGAL DESCRIPTION: File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Page No. 2 LOT 34 OF WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DMSION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 97 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 55 THROUGH 58, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 34 LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 34; THENCE SOUTH 76015-05" WEST 498.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 27011'14" WEST 144.64 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE. (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT B OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 8802019, RECORDED MAY 9, 1988 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8805090973.) FirstAmerican Tide Insurance Company 4, 2005 3:24 PM PAGE 5/009 Fax Server Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the Requirements to be complied with: File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Page No. 3 Item (A) Payment to or for the account of the Grantors or Mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (B) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record. SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS The Policy or Policies to be issued will contain Exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. A. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. B. Any facts, rights, interest, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of person in possession thereof. C. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. D. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. E. (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) Water rights, claims or title to water; whether or not the matters excepted under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records; (4) Indian Tribal Codes or Regulations, Indian Treaty or Aboriginal Rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. F. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, materials or medical assistance theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, construction, tap or reimbursement charges/costs for sewer, water, garbage or electricity. H. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgages thereon covered by this Commitment. FitstAmerican Title Insurance Company 4/5/2005 3:24 PM PAGE 6/00F Fax Server Form WA-5 (6/76) Commitment SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 (continued) SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. General Taxes for the year 2005 File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Page No. 4 Tax Account No.: 926500-0340-00 Amount Billed: $ 9,648.56 Amount Paid: $ 0.00 Amount Due: $ 9,648.56 Assessed Land Value: $ 793,200.00 Assessed Improvement Value: $ 0.00 2. A document entitled "School Planning Agreement", executed by and between Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc. and Federal Way School District No. 210 recorded February 28, 1973, as Instrument No. 7302280392 of Official Records. 3. A document entitled "Sewer Service Agreement", executed by and between Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and Lakehaven Sewer District recorded August 23, 1973, as Instrument No. 7308230502 of Official Records. 4. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: March 19, 1974 Recording No.: 7403190539 Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded November 29, 1979 and December 11, 1985 as 7911290745 and 8512110086 of Official Records. 5. Provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws of the Campus Business and Office Park Owners' Association, and any tax, fee, assessments or charges as may be levied by said association. 6. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the the Plat of West Campus Office Park Division No. 1 recorded in Volume 97 of Plats, at Pages 55 through 58, in King County, Washington. 7. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Minerals Reserved By: Weyerhaeuser Timber Company Recorded: December 27, 1983 and May 17, 1984 Recording Information: 8312270573 and 8405170906 FiistAmeriran Title Insurance Company 4i 2005 3:24 PM PAGE 7/009 Fax Server Forth WA-5 (6/76) Commitment 8. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 9207170679 In Favor of: Weyerhaeuser Company For: Underground communication line Affects: Southerly portion 9. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 7702080104 For: Access and utilities Affects: Southerly 15 feet A. 3 Cal M INFORMATIONAL NOTES File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Page No. 5 Effective January 1, 1997, and pursuant to amendment of Washington State Statutes relating to standardization of recorded documents, the following format and content requirements must be met. Failure to comply may result in rejection of the document by the recorder. Any sketch attached hereto is done so as a courtesy only and is not part of any title commitment or policy. It is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and First American expressly, disclaims any liability which may result from reliance made upon it. The description can be abbreviated as suggested below if necessary to meet standardization requirements. The full text of the description must appear in the document(s) to be insured. LOT 34, WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIV. 1, VOL. 97 PG. 55 APN: 926500-0340-00 A fee will be charged upon the cancellation of this Commitment pursuant to the Washington State Insurance Code and the filed Rate Schedule of the Company. END OF SCHEDULE B FiistAmerican TZNe Insurance Company 4/5/2005 3:24 PM PAGE 8/00F Fax Server Form WA-5 (6/76) File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Commitment Page No. 6 ells FirstAmerican TZt1e Insurance Company National Commencral Services COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations 1. The term "mortgage" when used herein shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment, other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act or reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclosure such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option, may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of Policy or Policies committed for, and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the Policy or Policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of Policy or Policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references, and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the Insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment. FirstAinencan Title insurance Company 4/ 2005 3:24 PM PAGE 9/009 Fax Server Form WA-5 (6/76) File No.: NCS-101664-WA3 Commitment Page No. 7 The FirstAmerican Corporation FrstAmerican Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we wifi do with such informaton particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, together with our parent company, The First American Gorporation, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use infomation we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. First American has also adopted broader guidelines that govern our use of personal infomiation regardless of its source. First American calls these guidelines its Fair Information Values, a copy of which can be found on our website at www.firstam.com. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: Inforrration we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and - Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information firm you for. our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffrirated party. Therefore, we wilt not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (1) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, stare such infamiadon indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such infornmation may be used for any intemal purpose, such as quality control effort or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as tide insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies, and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide aA the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you, Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know drat information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy and First American's Fair Information Values. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal infomadon. c 2001 The First American Corporation - All Rights Reserved FirstAmer%can Title insurance Company CITY OF Federal Way DATE: April 4, 2005 TO: Isaac Conlen FROM: Sean Wells, P E. SUBJECT: WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL - (05-100807-00-UP) 33455 6TH AVE S - Application Incomplete MEMORANDUM Public Works Department Development Services has reviewed the preliminary analysis and plans for West Campus Medical date stamped received February 22, 2005 and the resubmitted information date stamped received March 18, 2005, and found items that need to be submitted to determine the application complete. These items are in accordance with Title 22-33 of the Federal Way City Code and are as follows: 1. Current Title Report a. The report submitted is a Title Insurance Policy, not a Title Report. Title Insurance is a policy of insurance that indemnifies the holder against loss sustained by reason of a defect in the title. A Title Report is a report that discloses the condition of the title to a parcel of real property, made by a title company. b. The Title Report needs to be current within the last 30 days. The City should suspended review of the land use pefmit until the additional information is submitted. If you have any questions in regard to this memo, please contact Sean Wells of Development Services at (253) 835-2731. L: I CSDCIDOCSI SA VE111094687048.DOC TA LASA EA CONSULTANTS, INC. 18 March 2005 COMMUNITYDRECEIVED�ELOTTDEPARTMENT MAR 2 9 2005 Tat-732 Mr. Isaac Conlen, Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8t" Avenue South P.O. Box 9718 Federal Way, Washington 98063-9718 REFERENCE: West Campus Medical Arts - Federal Way, WA Federal Way Permit #05-100807-000-00-UP SUBJECT: Wetland Reconnaissance and Delineation Dear Isaac: On 11 July 2002, Talasaea Consultants conducted a wetland reconnaissance and wetland delineation on Lot E in the West Campus area of Federal Way. Talasaea returned to the site and verified that the boundary was still correct on 19 June 2004. Following is a description of our methodology and general site conditions. Methodology The routine on -site wetland determination method was used to delineate the wetlands using the procedures outlined in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (1997). Plant species were identified according to the taxonomy of Hitchcock and Cronquist (1973), and the wetland status of plant species was assigned according to the list of plant species that occur in wetlands, published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Reed 1988, 1993). Wetland classes were determined on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's system of wetland classification (Cowardin, et. al., 1979). Vegetation was considered hydrophytic if greater than 50% of the dominant plant species had a wetland indicator status of facultative or wetter (i.e., facultative, facultative wetland, or obligate wetland). Soil on the site was considered hydric if one or more of the following characteristics were present: • organic soils or soils with a histic epipedon (i.e., organic surface layer), • matrix chroma just below the A -horizon (or 10 inches, whichever is less) of 1 or less in unmottled soils, or 2 or less if mottles were present, or • gleying immediately below the A -horizon. Indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not necessarily limited to: drainage patterns, drift lines, sediment deposition, watermarks, stream gauge data and flood predictions, historic records, visual observation of saturated soils, and visual observation of inundation. Resource i- Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, AUashington 98077 • Bus: (425) 861-7550 ° Fax: (425) 861-7549 Mr. Isaac Conlin 18 March 2005 Page 2 of 2 An evaluation of the vegetation, soils, and hydrology was made at various locations along the interface of wetland and upland. Wetland boundary points were then determined from this information and marked with flagging and surveyed. Results This lot consists primarily of a moderately aged, second growth Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii) forest with an understory dominated by salal (Gaultheria shallon). Madrona (Arbutus menziesii), red alder (Alnus rubra), and bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata) are also common. One wetland was delineated in the northwestern corner of the site, adjacent to the regional stormwater detention pond (Figure 1). This wetland is a palustrine forested wetland and is dominated by red alder, willow (Salix sp.), spirea (Spiraea douglash), and slough sedge (Carex obnupta). The wetland is confined to a relatively narrow band along the pond edge. The wetland receives hydrologic support from both the pond, as well as a stormwater outfall located in the wetland. Soil in the wetland was observed to be black (10YR2/1) and was saturated near the surface at the time of the delineation. Attached are data forms prepared by Talasaea for representative locations in both the upland and wetland. These data forms document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology information that aided in the wetland boundary determination. The delineated wetland would be classified by the Federal Way City Code (Section 22- 1357) as a Class II wetland due to the presence of two classes of vegetation, neither of which is dominated by invasive species. Class II wetlands have a standard buffer of 100 feet. The stormwater pond is classified as a regulated lake, which has a buffer of 25 feet. The buffer of the lake is located well within the required wetland buffer. Wetland functions and values include surface water control, wildlife habitat, pollution and erosion control, groundwater exchange, open space and recreation, and educational and cultural opportunities. Because the wetland is connected to the adjacent pond, the functions and values are addressed collectively. The wetland has relatively high value for surface water, pollution, and erosion control, as the adjacent pond is connected to the City's stormwater system. This provides the opportunity for the wetland to filter out pollutants, detain water, and prevent downstream erosion. Because the pond detains water, the wetland also has relatively high value for groundwater exchange. The wetland is located in an urban area, and is nearly surrounded by development. This depresses the wetland's value for wildlife. However, the open water component of the pond and the presence of a predominant of native vegetation results in moderate wildlife habitat value. The wetland also provides some open space and may provide some passive recreational value, such as bird watching. During our site visit, we did not observe any threatened or endangered wildlife species. Due to the limited time on the property and the surrounding developments, our wildlife observations were limited. Species observed on the property included a eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensus) and an American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos). It is expected that the pond may be used by a variety of species of dabbling ducks, and the surrounding area by a variety of songbirds. Significant mammal use would be limited due to the developed nature of the surrounding area. Mr. Isaac Conlin 18 March 2005 Page 3 of 3 I hope is this is sufficient for the City's review of sensitive areas on the subject property. If you have any questions, please call me at 425-861-7550. Sincerely, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Teresa Opolka Wetland Ecologist cc: Al Di Santis, BCRA Attachments DATA FORM I p ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD' Field Investigator(s): —Ppr�l l k' C. � Date: Project/Site: G4^-" i , ( • - State: V County:_ jG`Yl�l, ApplicantlPlant Community #/Name: Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes No (If no, explain on back) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Nor>eC (if yes, explain on back) VEGETATION Indicator Indicator Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum I 6,�rLew j 11 2 -4 12 3 13 4 14 5 15 6 16 7 17 8 18 9 19 10 20 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC Is the hydropIh� c ve,eta n} cri�tenon met? Yes No ' Rationale: f [Jl� 0U%L' '�,��"" S SOILS Series/Phase . 'act AW ffll( !9 Subgroups Is the soil on the hydric list? Yes o Undetermined Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Yes No Is the Soil: Mottled? Yes No Gleyed? Yes No Matrix Color. I Mottle Colors: Other hydric soi indicators: Is the hydric §oil criteria met? Yes No Rationale: 21g�& HYD40LOGY Is the ground surface inundated?. Yes . . No ^ Surfacewater depth Is the soil saturated? Yes I_ No DIj l� Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: (] Gi I �, i' ?+ i 5,ev lra,-A List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation ",, 05 IWI: UO l Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes >(- No JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No Rationale Jurisdictional decision:c,-- This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community Assessment Procedure. ZClassification according to "soil Taxonomy." DATA FORM ROUTINE ONSITE DETERMINATION METHOD' Field Investigator(s): Date: / `/ Project/Site: 1-0-C-1 A � - State: County. .4/ !C Applicant/Owner: Plant Community #/Name: -Note: If a more detailed -site -description -is necessary,- use the -back of data -form or a field notebook-.--- .. . .................. ­­ ......................... -.............. ...... .W...... _.... ......... ........................... ...m__._..._...._._....._.._.... _ ._.._.._.........m_. __. Do normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? Yes K No (If no, explain on back) Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes No (if yes, explain on back) VEGETATION Indicator Indicator Dominant Plant Species Status, Stratum Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum 1 7�/if�r�� l! A-GUi 11 2 r o LlI7.,c S�� Cl-j 12 3 It ra, G 13 4 %. 1 �l r7' _ I,l�i' !� Glib 14 5 r 1 Io'7 15 6 16 7 17 8 18 9 19 10 20 Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC �r Is the HydrophInyfd : vegetation c erion met? Yes No X Rationale: tom' f+.11+ °� me Fr'i-tw , I -, ,a pfafr ea S SOILS ' Series/Phase: 6L v.�&Pdty1J ()71�1l 1 . r /.rg,13ubgroup2 Is the soil on the by ric list? Yes J No_ Undetermined Is the soil a Histosol? Yes No Histic epipedon present? Is the Soil: Mottled? Yes No�E Gleyed? Matrix Color Mottle Colors: Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No Rationale: 1?knT 1--7G( /,Wj fG R7 Yes. Yes No No HYDROLOGY Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No �%C Surface water depth Is the soil saturated? Yes No Depth to free-standing water in pit/soil probe hole: 1T1GLf_ List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation few _ Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No. Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the plant community a wetland? Yes No Rationale Jurisdictional decision: a_G mL' _ t{ rali L-�e''-o /v f-- CY{, This data form can be used for the Hydric Soil Assessment Procedure and the Plant Community Assessment Procedure. 2Classification according to "soil Taxonomy." 4 PLAN LEGEND — — — — PROPERTY LINE EXISTING GONTOUR — — — • — — — • — EXISTIN6 WETLAND BOUNDARY — — — — — — — — — 100' WETLAND BUFFER X WETLAND FLAG X" 501L TEST PLOT LOCATION EXI5TIN6 TREES WETLAND GONTI NUES Y ti' ti •r\ OFF-51—(E A—t \'ti I.E. 303.0{ `: �iy,a xTP WETLAND A >TP ;=�_:�- t� 6LA55 II A—� , :``. _ 1G ..•,7 4- . A 8 1 I�•, + 1 1 WETLAND CONTINUES »,A— A_9 —SITE OFF 5(— — — i�`:' 14 10, 77 TF ¢c1..4fa , AK 14 r • _ �J{ 1 �•--� t". `yam 'J' -�� s 1 ORAFHIG SCALE NORTH IN FEET) ID O 30 60 120 \\ ', SCALE: I "=60' EXISTINO GON17)ITION5 NOTES: I. BASE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY E5M GON5ULTIN6 ENGINEERS. 2. SOURGE DRAWING WA5 MODIFIED BY TALASAEA GON5ULTANTS FOR VISUAL ENHANCEMENT. 3. WETLANDS DELINEATED BY TALASAEA GON5ULTANT5 IN JULI' OF 2002, i TALASAEA CONSULTANTS, INC. Resource & Environmental Planning 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast Woodinville, Washington 98077 Bus (425)661-7550 — Fax (425)861-7549 FIGURE #1 EXISTIN6 GONDITION5 WEST GAMPUS MEDICAL ARTS FEDERAL WAY, WA514I146TON DESIGN I DRAWN I PROJECT KG •732 SCALE I "=60' —f' I DATE 18 MAR 05 © Copyright — Talasaea Consultants, INC- I CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 'Z 5=2607;Fax 253-835-2609 ESU I) v.ciixoffederalwM.com MAR 18 2005 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY STATEMENT CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AND WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS I. WHY SHOULD THIS INVENTORY STATEMENT BE FILLED OUT? Critical Aquifer Recharge (CARAs) and Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) are considered "critical areas" pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection." This inventory statement must be filled out by the applicant or agent for any proposed activity listed in Section II of this handout, and which are located within Wellhead Capture Zones 1, 5, and 10 as shown on the Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas Maps. Please refer to the handout on Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas for a description of the review process. H. ACTIVITIES GOVERNED BY CARA AND WBPA REGULATIONS The inventory statement must be filled out for the following activities: • Construction of any residential structure, including single-family development ■ Construction of any barn or other agricultural structure • Construction of any office, school, commercial, recreational, service, or storage building ■ Construction of a parking lot of any size ® Other minor new construction (see WAC 197-11-800[2]) • Additions or modifications to or replacement of any building or facility (does not include tenant improvements) ■ Demolition of any structure ■ Any landfill or excavation • Installation of underground tanks • Any division of land, including short plats • Change of use, which involves repair, remodeling, and maintenance activities • Dredging • Reconstruction/maintenance of groins and similar shoreline protection structures • Replacement of utility cables that must be buried under the surface of the bedlands ■ Repair/rebuilding of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs • Installation or construction of any utility, except for on -going operation and maintenance activities of public wells by public water providers • Personal wireless service facilities Project Name is (JAL AM Applicant! - Project Location 3254 5 6�44 A S . __ Tracking No. QAlt l.(c' . o G " 100 %Crj- 0d6 -tom —UP- IV. FURTHER INFORMATION Provide the approximate quantity of fill and source of fill to be imported to the site. Approximate Quantity of Imported Fill Source of Fill Ly kA 90*;Y'1W 90 `2 a Check box # 1 if you do not plan to store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous material or deleterious substance listed in Section III. Check box(s) #2 through #5 (and fill in appropriate blanks) of the below table if they apply to your facility or activity. The proposed development will not store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of #1 [ ] the types and quantities of hazardous materials or deleterious substances listed above. #2 [ ] Above ground storage tanks, having a capacity of gallons will be installed. #3 [ ] Construction vehicles will be refueled on site. Storage within wholesale and retail facilities of hazardous materials, or other deleterious #4 [ ] substances, will be for sale in original containers with a capacity of _ gallons liquid or mounds solid. The presence of chemical substances on this parcel is/will be for "temporary" non -routine #5 [ ] maintenance or repair of the facility (such as paints and paint thinners) and are in individual containers with a capacity of _ gallons liquid or mounds solid. Check any of the following items that currently exist or are proposed in connection with the development of the site. #1 [ Stormwater infiltration system (e.g., french drain, dry well, stormwater swale, etc.) #2 [ ] Hydraulic lifts or elevator, chemical systems, or other machinery that uses hazardous materials #3 [ ] Cathodic protection wells #4 [ ] Water wells, monitoring wells, resource protection wells, piezometers #5 [ ] Leak detection devices, training for employees for use of hazardous materials, self-contained machine , etc. SIGNA.TU �Xc Signature A6rk- A - c�-- saix �- Print Name 3� I S�aS Date Ifyou have any questions about filling out this application form, please call the Department of Community Development Services at 253-835-2607. Please be advised that an application for a development permit lacking the required information will not be accepted Bulletin #056 - November 24, 2004 Page 3 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Project Name t\� C.-�-RPOcD 1' V-AL- Applicant Project Location ' J3 --Atss ul, ko' S • _ Tracking No. �F 1 60-f_ wgh,tl` III. TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Please provide the approximate quantity of the types of hazardous materials or deleterious substances that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity. If no hazardous materials will be involved, please proceed to Section IV. MATERIAL LIQUID(gallons) SOLID (pounds) (1) Acid or basic solutions or solids (2) Antifreeze or coolants (3) Bleaches, peroxides, detergents, surfactants, disinfectants, bactericides, algaecides w -r �%G�+►k11 a�1S (4) Brake, transmission, hydraulic fluids (5) Brine solutions (6) Corrosion or rust prevention solutions (7) Cutting fluids (8) Deicing materials (9) Dry cleaning or cleaning solvents (10) Electroplating or metal finishing solutions (11) Engraving or etching solutions (12) Explosives (13) Fertilizers (14) Food or animal processing wastes (15) Formaldehyde (16) Fuels, additives, oils, greases (17) Glues, adhesives, or resins (18) Inks, printing, or photocopying chemicals (19) Laboratory chemicals, reagents or standards (20) Medical, hospital, pharmaceutical, dental, or veterinary fluids or wastes (21) Metals (hazardous e.g. arsenic, copper, chromium, lead, mercury, silver, etc. (22) Paints, pigments, dyes, stains, varnish, sealers. (23) Pesticides, herbicides or poisons (24) Plastic resins, plasticizers, or catalysts (25) Photo development chemicals (26) Radioactive sources (27) Refrigerants, cooling water (contact) (28) Sludges, still bottoms (29) Solvents, thinners, paint removers or strippers (30) Tanning (leather) chemicals ^_ (31) Transformer, capacitor oils/fluids, PCB's (32) Waste oil (33) Wood preservatives _ (34) List OTHER hazardous materials or deleterious substances on a separate sheet. Bulletin #056 — November 24, 2004 Page 2 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement 03/14/2005 21:37 253862- �0 DUNHAM PAGE 02 Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) u,der Number: NCS-101664 WA3 . ALTA Standard owner's Policy Page Number: I Western Regional Exceptions )LIS Is it f k �q First American Title Insurance Company RESUBMIT - National . Commercial ServiceMI. 3866 South 74th Street MAR 18 2005 Tacoma, WA 98409 November 20, 2004 Pro -Medical, L.L.C. 21011 26th St. Ct. E. Sumner, WA 98390 Title Officer: Renee Richardson Phone: (253)471-5561 Order Number: 101664 Escrow Officer: Renee Richardson Phone: (253)471-1234 Buyer: Pro -Medical, L.L.C. Property: vacant land, Federal Way, WA Attached please find the following item(s): A Policy of Title Insurance Thank You for your confidence and support. We at First American Title Company maintain the fundamental principle: Customer First. Flmt American rtie Insurance Company 03/14/2005 21:37 253862 DUNHAM PAGE 03 Farm No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) ALTA Standard Owner's Policy Westem Regional Fxceptlons trrder Number: NCS-101664-WA3 Page Number: 2 Policy of Title Insurance XSoK j, ISSUED BY First American Title ,Insurance Company SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Califomia corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown In Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: Tftie to the estate or Interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the titre; 3. Unmarketabllity of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses Incurred In defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. firstAmerican Title Insurance Iornpavy at PFRESMIDFNT AM-ST ;71" A SMAF.TAFEY First American Title rnsurancle Company 03/14/2005 21:37 253862- `1 DUNHAM Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) ALTA Standard Owner's Policy Western Regional Exceptions SCHEDULE A Premium: $1,490.00 Amount of Insurance: $500,000,00 Date of Policy: November 10, 2004 at 3.00 P.M. 1. Name of Insured: Pro -Medical, L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company O.,jer Number: NCS-101664-WA3 Page Number- 3 Policy Number:101664 2. The estate or interest in the land which Is covered by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: The Quadrant Corporation, a Washington corporation 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: PAGE 04 Real property In the City of Federal Way, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: LOT 34 OF WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 97 OF PLATS AT PAGES) 55 THROUGH 58, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 34 LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 34; THENCE SOUTH 761115'05" WEST 498.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 27011' 14" WEST 144.64 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE. (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT B OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 8802019, RECORDED MAY 9, 1988 UNDER RECORDING NO. 8805090973.) First Amencon T!t/e Insurance Company 41 03/14/2005 21:37 253862- 9 DUNHAM Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) ALTA standard Owner's Policy Western Regional Exceptions SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE PAGE 05 �..,er Number: NCS-1016WWA3 Page Number: 4 r This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: PART ONE SECTION ONE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making Inquiry of persons In possession thereof. 3. Easements, claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. First American Tide Insurance Company 03/14/2005 21:37 253862-' DUNHAM PAGE 06 Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) ewer Number NCS-101664-WA3 ALTA Standard Owner's Policy Page Number: 5 r Western Reglonal Exceptions 2. 3, 4 I: SECTION TWO Evidence should be submitted prior to closing of the authority of the officers, if other than Walter P. Costello as Sr. Vice -President of Quadrant Corporation, to execute the forthcoming instrument. A document entitled "School Planning Agreement", executed by and between Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc, and Federal Way School District No. 210 recorded February 28, 1973, as Instrument No. 7302280392 of Official Records. A document entitled "Sewer Service Agreement", executed by and between Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and Lakehaven Sewer District recorded August 23, 1973, as Instrument No. 7308230502 of Official Records. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: Recording No.: March 19, 1974 7403190539 Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded November 29, 1979 and December 11, 1985 as 7911290745 and 8512110086 of Official Records. Provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws of the Campus Business and Office Park Owners' Association, and any tax, fee, assessments or charges as may be levied by said association. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the the Plat of West Campus Office Park Division No. 1 recorded In Volume 97 of Plats, at Pages 55 through 58, in King County, Washington, 7. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Minerals Reserved By: Weyerhaeuser Timber Company Recorded: December 27, 1983 and May 17, 1984 Recording Information: 8312270573 and 8405170906 8. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 9207170679 In Favor of: Weyerhaeuser Company For: Underground communication line Affects: Southerly portion F/rst American 77tle Xnsuranae Company 03/14/2005 21:37 2538627 Form No. 14D2.92 (10/17/92) ALTA standard Owner's Policy Western Regional Exceptions DUNHAM 9. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information. 7702080104 For: Affects: Access and utilities Southerly 15 feet PAGE 07 tr„jer Number: NCS-101664•WA3 `] Page Number: 6 / , The map attached, if any, may or may not be a survey of the land depicted hereon. First American expressly disclaims any liability for loss or damage which may result from reliance on this map except to the extent coverage for such loss or damage Is expressly provided by the terms and provisions of the title insurance policy, if any, to which this map is attached. First American Tit/e Insurance Company 03/14/2005 21:37 2538627 , DUNHAM PAGE 08 Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) Vi „er Number: NC5-101664-WA3 19, ALTA Standard Owner's Pollcy Page Number; 7 Western Regional Exceptions EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1.(a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or, relating to (I) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (Ili) a separation in ovmership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (Iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defeck, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded io the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Late of Policy. 2. Rlghts of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Rate of Policy which would he binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3, Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at bate of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest Insured by this Policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting In the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that Is based on: (r) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (it) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the Instrument of transfer; or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS. The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "insured": the insured named In Schedule A, and, subject to any rights or defenses the Company would have had against the named Insured, those who succeed to the Interest of the named insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase including, but not limited to, heirs, dlstributees, devisees, survivors, personal representatives, next of kin, or corporate or fiduciary successors. (b) "insured claimant": an insured claiming loss or damage. (c) "knowledge" or "known": actual knowledge, not constructive knowledge or notice which may be imputed to an insured by reason of any public records as defined in this policy or any other records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting the land. (d) "land": the land described or referred to In Schedule (A), and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A), nor any rlght, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or wmterways, but nothing herein shall modify or limit the extent to which a right of access to and from the land is insured by this policy. (e) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (f) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of Polley for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. With respect to Section 1(a)(iv) of the Exclusions from Coverage, "public records" shall also include environmental protection liens flied in the records of the clerk of the United States district court for the district In which the land is located. (g) "unmarketabllity of the title": an alleged or apparent matter affecting the title to the land, not excluded or excepted from coverage, which would entitle a purchaser of the estate or interest described In Schedule A to be released from the obligation to purchase by virtue of a contractual candltlan requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CON71NUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER CONVEYANCE OF TITLE. The coverage of this policy shall continue In force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured only so long as the insured retains an estate or interest in the land, or holds an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given by a purchaser from the insured, or only so long as the insured shall have liability by reason of covenants of warranty made by the insured in any transfer or conveyance of the estate or interest -this polity shall not continue in force In favor of any purchaser from the insured of either (i) an estate or interest in the land, or, (11) an Indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given to an Insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT, The insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth it) Section 4(a) below, First American Title Insurance Company 03/14/2005 21:37 253862— 1 DUNHAM PAGE 09 Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) t,.uer Number: NCS-101664--WA3 ALTA Standard Owner's Policy Page Number: 8 Western Regional Exceptions (II) in case knowledge shall come to an insured hereunder of any claim of title or Interest which Is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as insured, and which rnight cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (III) If Ode to the estate or interest, an insured, Is rejected as unmarketable. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then as to the Insured all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any insured under this policy unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the fal lure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 4. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS; DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO CWPERATE. (a) Upon written request by the insured and subject to the options contained in Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations, the Company, at its own cost and without unreasonable delay, shall provide for the defense of an insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim adverse to the title or, interest as Insured but only as to those stated causes of action alleging a defect, lien —encumbrance or oMer matter insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of Its choice (subject to the right of the insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the insured as to those stated causes of action and shall not be liable for and will not pay the Fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an insured In the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, at its own cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or W do any other art which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest, as insured, or W prevent or reduce loss or damage to an Insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not It shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this policy. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, It shall do so diligently. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as required or permitted by the provisions of this policy, the Company may pursue any lltigadon to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, In Its sole discretion, to appeal from any adverse judgment or order. (d)In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of the Insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the insured, at tare Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid (i) in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtalning witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or proceeding, or effecting settlement, and (11) in any other lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to estabilsh the title to the estate or interest as Insured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any lltlgation, with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation, S. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Insured claimant shais be furnished to the Company within 90 days after the Insured claimant shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the defect in, qr lien or encumbrance on tine title, or other matter insure against by this pal icy which constltutes the basis of lass or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss a damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured da[me nt to provide the required proof of toss or damage, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall ternnlnate, including any liability or olyligatlon to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, wit regard to the matter or matters requiring such proof of loss or damage. In addition, the insured claimant may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, Inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be deslgnated by any authorized representative Of the Company. all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Insured claimant shall grant its permission, in wrltingr for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, Inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda In the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All Information designated as confidential by the Insured claimant provide to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, It is necessary in the adminisiTation of the claim. Failure of the Insured claimant to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parries as required in Uiis paragraph shall terminate any Ilabi10 of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 6. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS, TERMINATION OF UABILFFY. In case of a claim under this policy, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the amount of insurance under this policy together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Insured claimant, which were authorized by the Company, up to the time of payment or tender of payment and which the Company Is Obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option, all liability and obligations to insured under this policy, other than to make the payment required, shall terminate, Including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, and the policy shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To pay or otherwsse Settle With parties Other than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. (t) to pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or In the name of an insured claimant any claim insured against under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay; or (It) to pay or otherwise settle with the insured claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in paragraphs (b) (i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the insured under rs policy for the clainned lass or damage, other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any Ilablllty or obligation to defend, prosecute or continue any litigation. 7. DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF LIABILM AND COINSURANCE. This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Insured claimant who has suffered loss or damage try reason of matters insured against by this policy and only to the extent herein described. (a) The liability cf the Company under this polity shall not exceed the least of: (i) the Amount of Insurance stated In Schedule A: or, (n) the difference between the value of the insured estate or Interest as insured and the value of the insured estate or Interest subject to the defect, lien or encumbrance insured against by this policy. First American Tit/e Insurance Company 03/14/2005 21:37 253862' _1 DUNHAM PAGE 10 Form No. 1402.92 (10/17192) t,.uer Number: NCS-101664-WA3 ALTA Standard Owner's Policy Page Number; 9 Western Regional Exceptions (b) In the event the Amount Of Insurance stated In Schedule A at the date of Policy is less than BO percent of the value of the Insured estate or Interest or the full consideration paid for the land, whichever Is less, or If subsequent to the Date of Policy an improvement is erected on the tand which Increases the value of the insured estate or interest by at least 70 percent: over the Amount of Insurance sited In Schedule A, then this Policy is subject to the following: (I) where no subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata In the proporton that the amount of insurance at Date of policy bears to the total value of the Insured estate or interest at Date of Policy; or (ii) where a subsequent Improvement has been made, as to any partial loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that 120 percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A bears to the sum of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A and the amount expended for the Improvement. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to costs, attomeys' fees and expenses for whim the Company is liable under this policy, and shall only apply to that portion of any loss which exceeds, in the aggregate, 10 percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A. (c) The Company will pay only those costs, attomey5' fees and expenses incurred In accordance with Section 4 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 8, APPORTIONMENT. If the land described in Schedule (A)(C) consists of two or more parcels which are not used as a single site, and a loss is established affectng one or more of the parcels but not all, the Ions shall be computed and settled on a pro rata basis a$ if the amount of Insurance under this policy was divined pro rats as to the value on Date of policy of each separate parcel to the whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to mate of Policy, unless a liablllty or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to each parcel by the Company and the Insured at die time of the issuance of this policy and shown by an express statement or by an endorsement attached to this policy. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. (a) If the Company establishers the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the [and, or cures the claim of u n marketabi 11 ty of title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including Iitigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, It shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be Gable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any Iltigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title as Insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the insured In settling any Balm or sult without the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUMON OF INSURANCE; REDUMON OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. All payments under this polity, except payments made for costs, attomeys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro Canto. 11. LIABILM NONCUMULATFVE. It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance under this policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay under any policy insuring a mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule 6 or to which the insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is hereafter executed by an Insured and which Is a charge or hen on the estate or interest described or referred to In Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy to the insured owner. 12, PAYMENT OF LOSS. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this policy for endorsement of the payment unless the polley has been lost or destroyed, In which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the sat€sfactlon of the Company. (b) When tlablRy and the extent of toss or damage has been definitely fiXed In accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within 10 days thereafter. 13. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENTOR SETTLEMENT. (a) The Company's Right of Subrogation, Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Insured claimant. The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to al rights and remedles which the Insured claimant would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this polity not been issued. If requested by the Company, the Insured claimant shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against arty person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogall on. The Insured claimant sha11 permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the insured claimant and to use the name of the insured claimant In any transaction or iltlgation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Insured claimant, the Company shall be subrogated to these rights and remed es in the proportion which the Company's payment bears to the whole amount of the loss. Xf loss should result from any act Of the insured claimant, as stated above, that act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, shall be required to pay only that part of any losses Insured against by this policy which shall exceed the amount, If any, lost to the Company by reason of the impairment by the insured claimant of the Company's right of subrogation. (b) The Company's Rights Against Non-Insurod obligors. The Company's right of subrogation against non -Insured obltgors shall most and shall include, without !imitation, the rights of the insured to mdemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions riontalned In these Instruments which provide for subrogation rights by reason of this poA+y. 14. ARBITRATION. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the insured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may Include, but are not fimlted to, any controversy or Claim Between the Company and the Insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company Ise connection with its issuance or the breads of a policy provision or other obligation. All arbitraNa matters when the Amount of insurance is S1,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $1,000,000 sha11 be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules In effect on the date the demand for arbitration is made or, at the option of the insured, the Rules in effect at Date Of Polley shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attomeys' fees only if the laws of the state In which the land Is located permit a court to award attomeys' fees to a prevailing party. 3udgment upon the award rendered by the ArbWator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the sltus of the [and shall apply to an arbltratlon under the Tltle Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 19. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRte CONTRACT. First American Tit/e Insurance Company co" 03/14/2005 21:37 2538627 -1 DUNHAM PAGE 11 Form No. 1402.92 (10/17/92) u.-dr Number: NCS-101W-WA3 I' ALTA Standard Owner's Policy Page Number:10 Western Regional Exceptions (a) This policy together with all endorsemerrt5, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and Contract between the Insured and the Company, In Interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of lass or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest covered hereby or by any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this policy, (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 16. SEVERABILI[TY, In the event any provision of the policy is held Invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provision and all other grovlslons shall remain in full force and effect. 17. N077CES, WHERE SENT. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to the Company at 1 First American Way, Santa Ana, California 92707, or to the office which issued this polity. First American 7-itle Insurance Company CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 24, 2005 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, acting Assistant Building Official Wes Hill, Lakehaven Utility District Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department FROM: Isaac Conlen FOR DRC MTG. ON: March 10, 2005 - Internal Completeness Review FILE NUMBER(s): 05-100807-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: None PROJECT NAME: WEST CAMPUS MEDICAL PROJECT ADDRESS: 33455 6TH AVE S ZONING DISTRICT: OP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposal to develop a one story medical office building and associated storage building. The building will be wood construction with cement board siding and masonry veneer. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT: Process III, SEPA MED PRO LLC 21011 26TH ST CT E 2537324251 (Work) MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Architectural plan set, TIR, TIA, Geotech report, SEPA checklist, certificates of sewer & water availability, design narrative. I RECEIVED .. h i 2 2 Z005 CITY OF '--- � ^ITY'OF EEOERAL WAY Federal Way t3131LDING DEPT. MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-6614000;Fax 253-661-4129 w-tvw. c ityo# f ederal way. cam APPLICATION NO(S) 19 Date 02-17-05 Project Name West Campus Medical Arts Property Address/Location 33455 6`h Ave South Federal Way, WA 98063 Parcel Number(s) 9265000340 Project Description One stony medical office buildingand associated storage building. The building will be wood construction with cement board siding. masonry veneer and asphalt shingle roofing. PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment _ Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination _ Preapplication Conference Process I (Director=s Approval) _ Process II (Site Plan Review) X Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) _ Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) _ Process VI X_ SEPA w/Project _ SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information OP: Office Park Zoning Designation Comprehensive Plan Designation $0.00 Value of Existing Improvements S2.2 M Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type VB with sprinkler Construction Type Applicant Name: Pro -Medical, L.L.C. Address: 21011 26`h Street Court East City/State: Sumner, WA Zip: 98390 Phone: (253) 732-4251 Fax: Email: Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Albert A. de Santis Address: 2106 Pacific Ave Suite 300 City/State: Tacoma, WA Zip: 98402 Phone: (253) 627-4367 Fax: (253) 627 4395 Email: al@architectsbcra.com Signature: Owner Name: Pro -Medical, L.L.C. Address: 21011 26a` Street Court East City/State: Sumner, WA Zip: 98390 Phone: (253) 732-4251 Fax: Email: Signature: Bulletin #003 — March 3, 2003 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts — Revised\Master Land Use Application ,4 R C 1i I T E C T S BCRA T S A N G February 17, 2005 Mr. Issac Conlen, City of Federal Way City Hall 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Subject: West Campus Medical Arts Dear Mr. Conlen Thank you for your review of the West Campus Medical Arts Office Building. Attached are the required documents for the City of Federal Way Master Land Use Process III, as indicated in the Checklist of the 8/18/04 version of the Development Requirement Bulletin #001 and SEPA. Also attached is our Architectural Narrative which will address the statement of architectural design intent. A separate letter, addressed to Mr. Ken Miller requesting a modification to the South access road easement right of way improvements is attached. If you have any questions regarding the response to your comments please don't hesitate to call. T ky , Albert A. de +S�antf, Architects BCRA Attachments Cc: Gary Dunham Bob Katica, Principal Architects BCRA ARCHITECTS B R O W N CONNALY R O W A N AKIYAMA INCORPORATED TEL 253.627.4367 2106 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 300 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98421 FAX 253.627.4395 % I " it ' T [ T BCl _ A T S A N G 1W West Campus Medical ARCHITECTURAL NARRATIVE The office building is conceived as a single story building with approximately ten (10) medical office suites and accessory spaces. A separate storage building and dumpster facilities are located west of the office building, which is proposed to be constructed of the similar materials and character as the office building. The office building is proposed to be designed of Type V, wood construction with a crawl space and manufactured wood trusses, accommodating mechanical equipment in the attic spaces and recessed rooftop areas. The exterior finish materials are proposed to include masonry veneer, wood or wood -like siding, ("Hardi-plank'), and glazed aluminum entry storefront and window systems. The roof is proposed to be laminated architectural composition shingles. Horizontal banding features are proposed around the building exterior walls using wood trim, roof fascias, masonry coursing possibly with accent bricks and alignment of window head/sill/mullions. The 'U shaped footprint of the building, is proposed to address the existing lot configuration and the building appearance, viewed from the street approach along 6th Avenue South, in the vicinity of South 335th Street. The building layout not only creates visual interest from the street, but also provides screening for the parking at the interior of the site and the building entry adjacent to and relating to the parking. The building design has proposed to modulate exterior walls with recesses and/or projected corners, and other wall fenestration to break-up the walls into appropriate wall proportions. ARCHITECTS B R O W N CONNALY R O W A N AKIYAMA INCORPORATED TEL 253.627.4367 2106 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 300 IV TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98421 FAX 253.627.4395 The inside corner of the `L' shaped building becomes the main building entry and the exterior patio space relates to the outside corner tenant suite. Added detail at the building's corner element of similar character to the main building entry and similar detail is proposed at secondary exits from the building to give consistency and balance. The varied amounts of glazed openings around the exterior of the building will help distinguish building common areas from the building office areas. Placement of the windows shall also accommodate anticipated medical suite room layouts The proposed color pallet being considered for the exterior materials include natural tones for the "field colors" of both masonry and painted/stained materials. Deeply saturated hues and/or the use of natural -colored accents/features are also being proposed. Focus will be to blend, highlight, and compliment colors with the available colors for masonry veneer. The proposed finish floor elevation is established at +312.00. At this elevation the building's southeast corner will be close to the finish grade of the adjacent parking lot drive along the south property line. The maximum building height proposed is approximately 22'-0" to 25'-0" above finish floor elevation. As this is a medical facility, storage rooms for medical supplies and drugs, will be included and the need for security is important. Also, the building design shall provide actual and perceived privacy of patients within all areas of the building. Therefore to assist the facility in achieving security and privacy, an ornamental metal fence is proposed around the perimeter of the site. This fence will be provided with gates at the entry driveways, that will remain open during business hours. LANDSCAPE NARRATIVE Landscaping is proposed to retain all of the trees in the wetland buffer, which equates to more than the 25% retention of identified significant trees on site. Elsewhere significant trees will be evaluated on a case -by -case basis for retention. New landscape proposes plants and trees that are indigenous to the Northwest, and in most cases will be drought tolerant. A combination of natural landscape design and formalized design will be introduced. All landscaping will consider site visibility for security/safety, plus avoidance of unnecessary maintenance around building and site. ARCHITECTS B R O W N CONNALY R O W A N AKIYAMA INCORPORATED TEL 253.627.4367 2106 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 300 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98421 FAX 253 627.4395 CIVIL NARRATIVE The civil improvements planned for the West Campus Medical Arts Office Building include site grading, storm drainage, water system, and sanitary sewer. The site grading and storm drainage design takes advantage of the regional storm water detention provided for the West Campus Storm Drainage detention system. This system was designed by Quadrant Corporation and services the entire area. This site's storm water drains to Lake 3, immediately adjacent to the project site. Ultimately this storm drainage finds its way to Lake #1 through an existing pipe network. The requirement for an on -site detention system was waived because of the provision for detention immediately downstream of the site. This approach was approved by Mr. Kevin Peterson of The City of Federal Way. Water quality is being provided through a proposed bio-swale which discharges to an existing storm drainage pipe running to Lake #3. The site grading is designed not only to direct on -site runoff to this water quality system but also to minimize site grading. The site water system, as shown, has been preliminarily approved by Lakehaven Utility District and the Federal Way Fire Marshal. The Sanitary Sewer system will involve connecting to the existing side sewer connection near the south-east corner of the site. The approval to maintain right of way improvements consistent with the Windermere Real Estate site is included for your reference. END OF NARRATIVE ARCHITECTS B R 0 W N CONNALY R O W A N AKIYAMA INCORPORATED TEL 253 627.4367 2106 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 300 TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98421 FAX 253.627.4395 February 17, 2005 Mr. Ken Miller, City of Federal Way City Hall 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Subject: West Campus Medical Arts Modification Request Dear Mr. Miller Along with our submittal for Process III - Master Land Use review for the West Campus Medical Arts Office Building, we are submitting the following modification request for your review. This modification request is consistent with the requirements for Process III review, as indicated in the Checklist of the 8/18/04 version of the Development Requirement Bulletin #001 as well as for SEPA. According to FWCC Section 1477 we may submit for a modification of the standards should our project be subject to one or more of the four reasons listed in this section. This modification request is to eliminate the requirement for a sidewalk along the southern side access road easement. Upon review of this section of the FWCC, we consider our reason for a modification request to reflect that of item one: (1) The improvement as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole. ARCHITECTS B R O W N CONNALY R O W A N AKIYAMA INCORPORATED TEL 253.627.4367 2106 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 300 'Wr TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98402 FAX 253.627.4395 �1 West Campus Medical Arts Modification Request Page 2 of 4 It is apparent that the existing access road easement currently does not provide all of the improvements as requested in our predevelopment conference, such as sidewalks or street buffer landscaping. It would be inharmonious and incongruous for this site and surrounding sites to be developed to become something this streetscape clearly is not. However, we do feel it would be useful and practical to maintain the required landscape buffer and street tree requirement. This would not only enhance the sense of privacy and image we are trying to achieve with our medical office project, but also would increase the amount of pervious site area which will reduce storm run-off. The requirement for a sidewalk would be inconsistent with the existing paved parking lot and parking lot islands directly adjacent to this site. Please refer to the site photographs below. Photo showing Existing parking to the South: Note that no curb, gutter, or sidewalks exist. ARCHITECTS B R O W N CONNALY R O W A N AKIYAMA INCORPORATED eI TEL 253.627.4367 2106 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 300 1W TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98421 FAX 253.627.4395 West Campus Medical Arts Modification Request Page 3 of 4 A sidewalk along the south side of the proposed project site would not connect to the next major street to the west, where sidewalks exist. Please note in the photo below, that a new east -west sidewalk would terminate at the west property line of this site since no sidewalk exists beyond this point. It would therefore serve no advantage to the neighborhood or city, and may encourage pedestrian traffic to walk onto the property via the new sidewalk, subjecting the project site and adjacent properties to unwanted trespassers. Our proposed design reflects a new sidewalk installed along 6th Avenue. This sidewalk appears to be appropriate since 6th Avenue already has established itself with street improvements and sidewalks. A modification request to waive street frontage improvements to be more consistent with the adjacent Windermere site has been approved in your December 20th, 2004 letter. Photo of adjacent West neighbor, (Proposed site is on the right side of photo: Note that no sidewalk exists to connect a new sidewalk to. ARCHITECTS B R O W N CONNALY R O W A N AKIYAMA INCORPORATED �JI TEL 253.627.4367 2106 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 300 'W TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98421 FAX 253.627.4395 West Campus Medical Arts Modification Request Page 4 of 4 The access road easement with a sidewalk which forms the southern frontage of the proposed site, could pose a privacy and security risk for the proposed Medical office building. The medical office building could be a target for burglary and thefts, due to the understanding that drugs would be stored within the medical office suites. Omitting a sidewalk along the access road easement, would help discourage pedestrians from walking next to the building, therefore increasing visual privacy at the building's perimeter rooms. It would also discourage access to the undeveloped areas of the site (wooded wetlands buffer and lake beyond) where unwanted trespassers could pose a security threat to the patients and occupants who park in and use the site. The proposed sidewalk configuration encourages pedestrians to use the new 6tn Avenue sidewalk and the sidewalk leading to the building at the northeast corner of the site, next to the site's primary entry driveway. We respectfully request your consideration in allowing a modification to delete the new sidewalk improvement along the south access road easement. We feel this modification maintains a consistency in appearance and function for this access road and is optimal for the proposed building use. If you have any questions regarding the response to your comments please don't hesitate to call. Thank you, Albert A. de Santis, Architects BCRA Attachments Cc: Gary Dunham Bob Katica, Principal Architects BCRA ARCHITECTS B R O W N CONNALY R O W A N AKIYAMA INCORPORATED TEL 253.627.4367 2106 PACIFIC AVENUE SUITE 300 V, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98421 FAX 253.627.4395 02/18/2005 15:44 FAX 25362743W3 BCRA 11'.42, DEC 29, 2004 pp"�� r Kin61.banty �./ � I DvpL of rkm veloprnt and rinviroum mentnl Bimq 1suiII&OZ S"erviam Dlvblon 900 oulmdale Aveuue SomhwZd ktpawrN'g7nsiibpon 99055-220 f, CR 2 2 2005 (206) 296-6600 TIY (200)29&1217 Gt-yBUILDING QEPT. 05-100807 16001 TEL 110: 25'�03-529-6 #29540 PAGE 2/3 Altemative formats available upon request Ding County Certific:alte of Sewer Availability This certificate provides the Seattle fling County Department of Public Health and the Department of Drvdrpmerz and fnvirinnmental Services with inforiniation ne6ftr-&Y to evaluate development proposals. Do not write In this box nurnhar t3ud61nq ?ermit M Preliminary Plat or P'UD Short Subdivisions Cl Rezone or other Applicant's name i' •Ni1 '� Proposed use: 449i�cA-_ Location: � � (artlzlclt map and regal dracriptilan if necessary) I D l . Sewer t a. Sewersetvi be prtrvided by side sewer connection only to an Wdsting size sewer —.�� faetfrom the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use, OR ❑ b, Sewer service will require an improvemard to the sewer eygtern of; LI (1) feet(44ieurertrunkorlaterolto reachtheeite; and/or ❑ (2) The constmuion of a collection srntem on the site; and/or 17 (3) Othar (dewxibe) _. _ 2. a. The sewer system improvement is In coftnrnance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. QR ❑ b. The sewer system improvementwIft require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment, S. t� a. The proposed project Is within the corporate llmtts of the distfict or has been granted Soundwy Review Board approval for edenelan of servico aasido the dlswctorcSty. OR Ci b. Annneamtlon or Boundary Review Hoard IST213) approval will he necessary to provide service. 4. Scrviaa is subject to the fbila0ing= a. Conhettion Charge: —TO AF-- i ^A c. Other AtcPyA&fl Sirf"roAl Ary> 4,4fn� _�Q��M WruL_ GIAcgsL-r/ " rr t Wstrrrr. xUls.are rrocre6aa, reaerw<J the t=ybi to dclq or deny seiner snvlca based upoa e2pgdty limilsitloto in Districtand Other Pnsveyorf2c{li*.1L e I certify that the above sewer agency Tnformatian is true. This certif e5on shall be valid for one year from date of Wgriatttre, t-PiKEIfAVEN 11T.T.LITY 1315 'RICT Agency name / ry name .� .�— roue 3ignai P� ante / Z fy sewer evallabTity form.doc b-cart-seweroa 02�"r'-2002 Page 1 of t 02/18/2005 15:44 FAX 253627439—S, BCRA 2002 King COIAftY Departmurrt of Development and Environmental Service& slindirm servlrxm Dlvislon 900 Oakeadale Avcnuo SouthWeat Rcnton,vvuhirlgton 98055-1210 ,ma-2ga•t3soo TTY 2d6-2t,7217 Alternative formats available upon request A King County Certificate of Water Availability I This certificate provides the Seattle King County Ot-parbtient of Public Health and the Departcrent of Development and i Environnle:rltal Scrvleca with information necessary to evgluate development proposals- ❑o natvrnte in th s box r - a �t3u1I41i1t1 Permit ❑ Prcllminary Plat or PUD _- Short Subdivision Rezone ar other Appllcanl,'s name. r / _. _ ._— Proposeduse; g26r _ Location: �37 5 (attach rnap and legal description if necessary) ®� • • 1, 'K a. OR ❑ b. WsteraW be provided by jea c2ryacction miy to an existing Side) water mpin thr?rt is bAr r �$!t - fvirom the site, F R 2 2 2005 It7' Water service will require an improvement to the Water system of ❑ (1) feet of water main to Math ihr3 site; and/or ❑ 0 The consrriotion of a djstriInt"n system an tho silo; at161bf Q (3) Other (de:sti") CITY OF I~EDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. 2, )f-1• The water system is in conformance with ei County approved water comprehensive plan_ OR 0 U. The water system improvement is not In canfnrmnnc,, with a County approved water comprehensivy �j O O QO Q 7 ptan and wilt require a water comprehensive plan amendment (this may cause a delay In issuance of a p� rt 1 :spprovorj, 3. f, a- The proposed project is wlthln the carpora;e limits of the djstrlot, or has been grrrntcd Bourldsry Review Doord approval for Wenslbh of service outside the district or city, of is Within the GuunV approved service area ofa private water purveyor. OR R b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will N? necaaaary to provide service, 4. 13 a. Water Is or will be avallable at tha rare 0 flow and duration indimted below at no I9ss than 20 pal maasurod at tho nuatm,rl fire hydrant -- feet from a :I/property (or as niartced on r -the attached nap). Rats of Vow it Peak Demand oN 6 rU 41r j lytfmVon ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) 0 I= than t hour 0 5D0 to 999 9DM 17 1 hour to 2 hours X 1000 gpm or more � 2 hours or more ❑ t7ow test of �prrr ] other X calculation of r -� ;' gpm f i 1- 7 is- o 4) (Note: Commercial building permlis whlch includes multifamHy Structures require now test or cnicufation.r OR ❑ L Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. $. �6, gi, Water system has certifleate: of water right or orator right Bairns sufficlent to provide service. OR 0 b, Water system does not currently have necessary water rights or water right claim$. Ca mrn rrn ISieondwons: l comfy thattha above water purveyerinformatlon to true. This certification Ahall bevalid for orlr_ yoarfrnm d*e of signature. _. LAKEUAVEN UTILITY DISTRICW Agency Hama =SignatbryZ31 r True srs gtu+v Pair: Highest c— J1�ps._ In :5 Pressure Zone; '�wesi E{ovation of Property 3 [�J Y F_St. Max.' pure i Vsirict, at its solo discretion, reserves the tight to delay or deny water service teased upQ1" LapsGity limitations in District and Offmir Purveyor facilities. Walcr availabilfty form Rev, 06-19-21)03 Page t of 1 EKE :39dd 017S6Z# LBPIb--6zS—ESZ :ON -131 1700Z `GZ 03Q bb : t T RECEIVED rZ F�:q 2 2 Z005 w l7Y (] F F E0 G RAL WADEP 4RTMEi DF CDN1MiJNiTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Ul! i]1N PT' 33325 80' Avenue South L iif of PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal:Way05-100807 253-835- w.dt Fax deralw5-2609 www.citvoffederalwa .com Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Directions Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by City Staff, and will be integrated into the Site Plan and/or Building Permit review process. Section and Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review E) Appli 4hIa during Building Permit lto'iew Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance 1.1 Blind Corners —Conforms. Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. —Revise NA Comments: Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should be permeable (see, through) including landscaping, fencing etc. ■ ❑ Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around corners. e Other strategy used: 13 1.2 Site and Building Layout — Conforms Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the Revise use to the street, and between uses __NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and I V' Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable (luring Site Plan Aevicw O Applicableduring Building Permit Review Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on For Non -Single corners. Family Development ❑ Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the dwelling. 1 Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/ retail development should not be from the rear of the building. ■ Offset windows, doorways and balconies to allow for natural observation while protecting privacy. ■ ❑ Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view of the street. M For Commercial/ Retail/ Industrial If employee entrances must be separated from the main and Community entrance, they should maximize opportunities for natural Facilities surveillance from the street. M ❑ In industrial developments, administration/offices should be located at the front of the building. r Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses of For Surface ❑ parking are proposed, provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ Parking Structures Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should e clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. ■ Avoid hidden recesses. ■ Locate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. ■ Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people. Parks, plazas, Open Space ❑ common areas, and playgrounds should be placed in the front Areas of buildings. Shopping centers and other similar uses should face streets. ■ Other strategy used: 0 Evaluation for Agency Use Only Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 2 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy 9 APIII icable during Site Plan Roviow 0 Applicable during Building Pern:iz Review 1.3 Common/Open Space Areas and Public On -Site Open — Conforms Space —Revise Provide natural surveillance for common/open space areas. NA Comments: Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent ❑ to main common/open space areas, e.g. playgrounds, swimming pools, etc., and public on -site open space. ■ Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which screens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. ■ Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the building entry. e Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy used: ❑ - 1.4 Entrances Conforms Provide entries that are clearly visible. Revise —NA i Comments: Design entrances to allow users to see into them before entering. M Entrances should be clearly identified (Signs must conform to FWCC Section 22-1569(D). Permit Exceptions. (Applicable during Certi cote of 022Wancy Ins coon . Other strategy used: 1.5 Fencing —Conforms Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and —NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 3 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Sertiala and Y" Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable [luring Size Plan Review e Applicablc during Building Permit Rt. i �Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g. pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. e Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ❑ oepen elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. If noise insulation is required, install doable -glazing at the ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. e Other strategy used: 1.6 Landscaping _Canfprms Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and Revise allows intruders to hide. —NA Comments: Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. ■ .� Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and / along pedestrian pathways. ■ ,-{ Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. ■ Other strategy used: 1.7 Exterior Lighting --conforms Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. -Revise (Refer to FWCC Section 22-1635(g)(1) for specific lighting NA requirements.) Comments: Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which ❑ addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Are Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Pennit Review Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. ■ For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that lighting supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal - resistant. e Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access/egress routes, and signage is well lit. e In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and mature form, as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light. e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e Select and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. ■ i7 Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e 13 Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people (retirement homes, congregate care facilities, senior and/ or community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in public/common areas. e Other strategy used:. u 1.8 Mix of Uses In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural surveillance, while protecting privacy. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Conforms Revise �NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 5 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and Functional Area Performance Performance. Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Roy icw O Applicable during Building P.ernia Revicw Where allowed by city code, locate shops and businesses on lower floors and residences on upper floors. In this way, ❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the residences can be observed by the businesses during business hours. ■ ❑ Include food kiosks, restaurants, etc. within parks and parking structures. ■ Other strategy: used El 1.9 Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors When used and permitted by building and fire codes, security bars, shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street and be consistent with the architectural style of the building. ❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable (see -through). e Other strategy used: Evaluation for Agency Use Only conforms Revise �NA Comments: Section and Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Ilse Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification _.Confonns Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to __Revise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find NA the building. Identification signs must conform to FWCC, Comments: Section 22-1569(D). Permit Exceptions. ❑ Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. e Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 6 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and V Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy 0 Applicable during Site Plan Review 8 Applicable during Building Permit Review In residential uses, each individual unit should be clearly numbered. In multiple building complexes, each building entry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry. In addition, unit numbers should be provided on each level or floor. e ❑ Street numbers should be made of durable materials, preferably reflective or luminous, and unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). e For larger projects, provide location maps (fixed plaque ❑ format) and directional signage at public entry points and along internal public routes of travel. e Other strategy used: 2.2 Entrances Confonns Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. __Revise NA Comments: rEntrances should be easily recognizable through design [� features and directional signage. (Signs must conform to FWCC Section 22-1569(D). Permit Exceptions. r Minimize the number of entry points. ■ Other strategy used: 2.3 Landscaping Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access. Revise NA Comments: ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. 6 Other strategy used: 13 2.4 Landscaping Location Conforms Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a Revise building or to neighboring buildings. __NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 7 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy a Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures, fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. ■ Other strategy used: 2.5 Security Conforms Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access _Revise _NA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures ❑ to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable during Certificate of Occupancy Inspection). Other strategy used: 2.6 Signage Conforms Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple —Revise to understand [Signs must conform to FWCC Section 22- NA 1569(D). Permit Exceptions]. Comments: ❑ Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graphics for informational signs. e Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and For Surface ❑ drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators, and exits. e Parking Structures In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system. e ❑ Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. e Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 8 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review 6 Applicable during Building Permit Review Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used:. Section 3.0 0-"rnership 3.1 Maintenance _—Conforms Create a "cared for" image _Revise _NA Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWCC ❑ Section 22-1569, in order to give an impression of ownership, care, and security. (Ongoing). Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no ❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance. ■ Other strategy used: 3.2 Materials _ conforms Use materials, which reduce the opportunityfor vandalism. Revise NIA COSllments: Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel ❑ materials, anti -graffiti paints, and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. e ❑ Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWCC Section 22- 1564(u) regarding the use of vegetative screens. e Common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points, or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist kL •A it: T �•. — � is - f'_... � — tl yrMf• • i -.'Yf � 41 Yam..= a. � . -•:� � .,.sF,� _ �v -- _ s� "' .".-'. _• f .fit>� 4 �: � _ • _ .jam ` � �y -- ._ . lk 41� 12� e A- JQ- ` y -.. � a,f i ,,. ..} Yam• i ,� •.. `: , r .' .�:- "'` ��� .�� �`�-". ate. • '•� , � ��'" - • _ `yet � _ �v ..�� -" �r 12/20/2004 11:13 25.38627300 DUNHAM PAGE 02 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Pro -Medical, L.L.C. 21011 26t" St. Ct. E. Sumner, WA 98390 20041110001303 pAri E2082801 4l10/04 13:20 F!G C�1UNTY , WA 5RL.F 36�a080- a PaGE001 OF 001 Reference Number of Related Document: N/A Grantor(s): The Quadrant Corporation Grantee(s): Pro -Medical, L.L.C. Assessor's Property Tax Parcel or Account No.: 926500-0340-00 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED fA I 0 A WY THE GRANTOR, THE QUADRANT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, 4fornA consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other valuable consideration in hand paid, conveys and warrants to PRO -MEDICAL, L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: LOT 34 OF WEST CAMPUS OFFICE PARK DIVISION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 97 OF PLATS AT PAGE(S) 55 THROUGH 58, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 34 LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 34; THENCE SOUTH 76015'05" WEST 498.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 27011'14" WEST 144.64 FEET TO THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE. (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT B OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 8802019, RECORDED MAY 9, 1988 UNDER RECORDING NO, 8805090973.) SUBJECT TO those matters set forth on Exhi i attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. DATED this _Lqa! day of November, 2004. RECEIVED 1890 ON1011n0 THE QUADRANT CORPORATION ' F p 2 2 2005 Ads' 1'a830-33 �0 �'iia By:CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Walter P. Costello, Senior Vice President HUJILOING DEPT, 1 0:100CUMENTS AND SETTINGMACHESOG.CORRLOCAL SETTINGSTEMPORARY INTERNET FILMOLN11%SWD.DOC 05-100807 12/,20/2004 11:13 2538627300 DUNHAM STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Walter P. Costello is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument, on oath stated that said person was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Senior Vice President of THE QUADRANT CORPORATION, a corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such company for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this a -(4 day of November, 2004. a M. ACHESONRY PUBLICF WASHINGTONSSION EXPIRESMBER 15 2007 [Seal or Stamp] 6,A I L (14, t�C SG rJ (print or type name) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for a State of Washington, residing at My Commission expires. 2 m0MUMENTS AND SMiNG"CHESOG.CORPILOCAL SEITINGSITEMPORARY INTERNET FILESIOLK11965W0.DQQ PAGE 03 11/1U/1UU4 11:13 2538627300 DUNHAM PAGE 04 EXHIBIT A TO STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED PERM177ED EXCEP-EQNS I. A document entitled "School Planning Agreement", executed by and between Weyerhaeuser Properties, Inc. and Federal Way school District No, 210 recorded February 28, 1973, as Instrument No. 7302280392 of Official Records. 2. A document entitled "Sewer Service Agreement", executed by and between Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company and Lakehaven Sewer District recorded August 23, 1973, as Instrument No. 7308230502 of official Records. 3,. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and/or easements: Recorded: March 19, 1974 Recording No.: 7403190539 Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded November 29, 1979 and December 11, 1985 as 7911290745 and 8512110086 of Official Records. 4. Provisions of the Artkies of Incorporation and 8y-Laws of the Campus Business office and be d oce Park owners' Association, and any tax, fee, assessments or charges as may by said association. 5. Restrictions, conditions, dedications, notes, easements and provisions, if any, as contained and/or delineated on the face of the the Plat of West Campus Office Park Division No. 1 recorded in Volume 97 of Plats, at Pages 55 through 56, in King County, Washington. 6. Reservations and exceptions, including the terms and conditions thereof: Reserving: Minerals Reserved By: Weyerhaeuser Timber Company Recorded: December 27, 1983 and May 17, 1984 Recording Information: 8312270573 and 8405170906 7. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 9207170679 In Favor of: Weyerhaeuser Company For: Underground communication line Affects: Southerly portion 8. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: 7702080104 For: Access and utilities Affects: Southerly 15 feet A-1 o.w0r,UMENra Am 8C- MNQ"CNESOO.CORPILOCAL SMINGSUEMPORARY INTERNET FILMOLK11913WD.DOC 11 • 4-J LILU Cyr L't'W4 King+ (::oanty Dept, of Development and Environmental Services Beitdhg .Services D"ivu 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, WwAiugwn 99055-1219 (206) 296-6600 1-1'Y (206) 296-7217 TEL NO: 253-529-4oei *29540 PAGE: 2/9 Alternative formats available upon request King County Certificate of Sewer Availability This certificate provides the Seattle IGng County Department of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Do not writs In this box number name _ _ _ Buildigg Permit M Preliminary Plat or PUD Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or other /j > Applicant's name: 'i -aM L V Proposed use; S Location: _��_ -1 -lf 4LTF--1 &r J LOA r�G yz a-oa f a (attach map and legal deacriplfon if nocessary) i Sewer agency • Geri rr a/ � ;` I (( a. Sewer servic270-be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing size sewer /� f} feet from the site and the saver system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR ❑ b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: ❑ (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; andfor ❑ (2) The construction of a collection system on the site; and/or ❑ (3) Other (describe) a. The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The sewer system Improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. !!� a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for witenslon of service outside the district or city. OR ❑ b. Annnexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. 4 Service is subject to the following: a. Connection charge: —TO FIX— ":�(if-h`?� _ — — b. Easement(s): _ jj:�! 48f= &O r&ff "" G. Other. 41 ' The IsrsHrf. of rt3 sore discrefts, reserves the tight to delay or deny sewer service based upon capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor facilities. + I certify thaf the above sewer agency Information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. LAKERAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT Agency name Title sewer waffabiltty form_doc b-cert-sewer.pdf 02-07-2002 S ry Warne Date Page t of t /-2 1-1,1,6 11 King County DepartmeM of Development and Environmental Services Z,10 Building Services Division y 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98055-1219 Altemative formats available 206-296-6600 TlY 206-296-7217 upon request King County Certificate of Water Availability This certificate provides the Seattle King County Department of Public Health and the Department of Development +end Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals, Do not write in this box number Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone orother Applicant's name - L e-- Proposed use;Ma2,rrA-.L ogle—r-- o WIZELV6 Location: - � i �v-EK AIE S - �.t A� A (attach map and legal description if necessary) rl ✓ vl ✓' 1. 'g a. Water4wol be provided by leer rpryslection only to an existing ^Y" y (size) water main that Is feet from the site. OR y0 r Y ❑ b. Water service will require an improvement to the water system of: ❑ (1) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or ❑ (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or Cl (3) Other (describe) 2. a, The water system Is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. OR ❑ b. The water system improvement is not In conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment (This may cause a delay In Issuance of a permit or approval). 3. {L a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the d€strlct, or has been granted Boundary Review Board / approval for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. OR 0 b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board (BRB) approval will be necessary to provide service. 4- ❑ a. Water is or will be available at the rate �f flow and duration indicated below at no less than 20 psi measured at the nearest fire hydrant '� feet from Jhe property (or as marked on the attached map) Rate of flow at Peak Demand bN 6T'ij A6 9: Duraflon ❑ less than 500 gpm (approx. gpm) ❑ less than 1 hour ❑ 500 to 999 gpm ❑ 1 hour to 2 hours X 1000 gpm or more 2 hours or more ❑ flow test of ppm 9 other calculation of 2r Soo f' _gpm (12-2$-4-4 (Note: Commercial building permits which includes multifamily structures require flow test or calculation.) OR ❑ b. Water system is not capable of providing fire flow. 5 a. Water system has certificates of water right or water right claims sufficient to provide service. OR ❑ b. Water system does not cun-ently have necessary water rights or water right claims. Comm ents/conditlons: I certify that the above water purveyor information is true. This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. - LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT Agency name Signatory na ►�1G.4 . IT�G'�I �- /� xfr-O� Tithe ^�- *Siglure Tye Date (�/7 Highest /I �� Min.7�__-_---•- � .l )n - r, � Pressure Zone; west Elevation of Property u� ; Est � um i The District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay or deny water service based upon capacity limitations in District and Other Purveyor facilities. Water availability form Rev. 0&19-2003 Page 1 of 1 E/C :30dd 0bS62# TBOV-62S—ESE :ON 131 J70AP •Fa ')-qO bb . T T 1 RECEIVED JUL 2 2 2005 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION DIVISION July 13, 2005 Mr. Ken Miller, City of Federal Way City Hall 33530 1" Way South Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Subject: REVISED West Campus Medical Arts Modification Request Dear Mr. Miller Following your response to our submittal for Process III - Master Land Use review and our meeting with you and Mr. Sean Wells, we are submitting the following revised modification request for your review. This modification request is to eliminate the requirement for a sidewalk and street lights along the southern side access road easement. According to FWCC Section 1477 we may submit for a modification of the standards should our project be subject to one or more of the four reasons listed in this section. Upon review of this section of the FWCC, we consider our reason for a modification request to be defined in item one: (1) The improvement as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or city as a whole. The requirement for this sidewalk is not harmonious with the existing street improvements for the following reasons, all of which are demonstrated in this letter: 1. This sidewalk would not facilitate pedestrian connections since it does not lead to any other pedestrian connection facilities. 2. The sidewalk would encourage pedestrians to trespass on private property. This will create issues of privacy for the proposed medical building and liability for the private property owner. 3. This area is an area of individual, privately -owned parcels, not a shopping center or Binding Site Plan project requiring inter -connectivity and employing shared parking arrangements. 4. The sidewalk would be inconsistent with requirements placed on neighboring projects. N 0. 1 A & I "M r- A, West Campus Medical Arcs Modification Request Page 2 of 4 This sidewalk would not facilitate pedestrian connections since it does not lead to any other pedestrian connection facilities. The requirement for a sidewalk would not serve its intended purpose of facilitating pedestrian connections between 1" Avenue and 6t' Avenue. Please refer to the site photographs below. Photo showing Existing parking to the South: Note that no curb, gutter, or sidewalks exist. In light of the parking area that exists to the south of the proposed site, the subject sidewalk would only serve to encourage customers of the proposed medical facility to park on the neighboring site. Its intended function of pedestrian connectivity would not be met because it could not continue west to ls` Avenue. Please note in the photo below, that a new east -west sidewalk would terminate at the west property line of this site since no sidewalk exists beyond this point. West Campus Medical Arts Modification Request Page 3 of 4 Photo of adjacent West neighbor, (Proposed site is on the right side of photo- Note that no sidewalk exists to continue pedestrian connection to lst Avenue. The sidewalk would encourage pedestrians to trespass on private property. This will create issues of privacy for the proposed medical building and liability for the private property owner. Should a sidewalk be constructed along the south edge of the property and affronting the private road easement, 2 outcomes would be certain. The first is that the public would be passing extremely close to the exam rooms, violating patient privacy issues. Although screening could be constructed, no screening can reduce visibility sufficiently to ensure that no one can see into the exam room when the sidewalk passes within 4 feet of the medical facility. The other outcome is that the public would be encouraged to walk through private property. Currently some pedestrian traffic does use this area despite the use constituting trespassing on private property. However, should a sidewalk be constructed in this area, the public is in effect being encouraged to trespass on private property rather than doing so against the owner's wishes. The legal position of the medical facility suffers significantly should a pedestrian be hurt on a sidewalk provided by the medical facility. Omitting a sidewalk along the access road easement, would help discourage pedestrians from walking next to the building, therefore increasing visual privacy at the building's perimeter rooms. It would also discourage access to. the undeveloped areas of the site (wooded wetlands 1 West Campus Medical Arr.s Modification Request Page 4 of 4 buffer and lake beyond) where unwanted trespassers could pose a security threat to the patients and occupants who park in and use the site. This area is an area of individual, privately -owned parcels, not a shopping center or Binding Site Plan project requiring inter -connectivity and employing shared parking arrangements. The imposition of this sidewalk effectively treats this individual, privately -owned and developed parcel as if it were one parcel in a larger Binding Site Plan project, which it is not. The arguments that the public may want to park at one facility and walk to the next is a good argument when a developer is constructing one project within an approved Binding Site Plan, but not in this case. This development does not benefit by any of the provisions of a Binding Site Plan process, but is being treated with the detriments of one by the imposition of this sidewalk. This project is not required to provide parking for adjacent tenants nor is it benefiting by a reduced parking requirement as it would if it were the component of a larger BSP-style development. The sidewalk would be inconsistent with requirements placed on neighboring projects. Our observation of sidewalk requirements placed on the project between the Beverly Enterprises Assisted Living Facility and the new ESM headquarters. ESM's facility did not construct sidewalk on the private road to their west, only on the street frontage on the side of their main entrance. Likewise, the Beverly Enterprises project only constructed the sidewalk on the east side of the project, the same side from which this project gains its main access. The elimination of the sidewalk south of the proposed site encourages pedestrians to use the new 6t' Avenue sidewalk and the sidewalk leading to the building at the northeast corner of the site, next to the site's primary entry driveway. Additionally, it allows for pedestrian connection to 336th and 1" Avenue along public Rights -of -Way. Lastly, it is consistent with requirements of neighboring sites and with the standards of individual site development. We request your consideration in allowing this modification to delete the new sidewalk and street lights along the south access road easement. We feel this modification maintains a consistency in appearance and function for this access road and is optimal for the proposed building use. If you have any questions regarding the response to your comments please don't hesitate to call. Tli k yo , Jeff binis, P.E. Sr. Project Manager BCRA, Inc. Cc: Gary Dunham Bob Katica, Principal, BCRA, Inc. �� HEATH & ASSQCIATES, INC. 1W December 16, 2005 Sarady Long City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98003 Subject: Dunham Medical TIA — Revisions to pro-rata cost De..^-r Mr. Lone*: and Civil Engineering ED DEC 2 9 2005 EEDEHHLVVAY r'UbLA, WORKS ADMINISTRATION DIVISION, This letter serves to address the request to revise the TIP contributions for the subject project. The costs are based on the revisions in the project cost for the projects identified in Table 1 that was reviewed previously. From Table 1. 1. TIP project 99 from 324th to 340th has been removed from the list. 2. TIP Map #4 S 320th Street @ 1st Avenue S is recalculated to $17,600 based on the increase in cost of the project from $4.2 million to $5.5 million. The project represents 0.32 percent. 3. TIP Map #15 S 336th Street @ 9th Avenue S remains the same at $1,900 as there was no change in project cost. The project represents 1.89 percent. 4. TIP Map #14 SR-18 @ SR-161 is recalculated to $7,050 based on the decrease in cost of the project from $4.5 million to $3.0 million. The project represents 0.235 percent. Total pro-rata cost is therefore $26,530. Please call if further information is required. Sincerely, Gregary B. Heath, P.E. 2214 Tacoma Road • Puyallup, WA 98371 • (253) 770-1401 • Fax (253) 770-1473 HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC. DUNHAM MEDICAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FEDERAL WAY, WA Prepared for: Jeff McInnis BCRA 2106 Pacific Ave, Ste 300 Tacoma, WA 98402 FEBRUARY 2005 Transportation and Civil Engineering RECEIVED FFR 2 2 Z005 Cf'TY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEP - 05-1008071. 2214 Tacoma Road • Puyallup, WA 98371 • (253) 770-1401 • Fax (253) 770-1473 DUNHAM MEDICAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction..................................................................................................................3 II. Project Description.......................................................................................................3 III. Existing Conditions.....................................................................................................3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...........................................................................................12 V. Conclusions and Mitigation........................................................................................19 Appendix LIST OF TABLES 1. Existing Level of Service......................................................................10 2. Accident History........................................................................................................12 3. Trip Generation..........................................................................................................13 4. Future Level of Service..............................................................................................18 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map & Roadway System................................................................................4 2. 3. Site Plan ........................................................................................................................5 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes................................................................................9 4. Trip Distribution & Assignment................................................................................14 5. 6. Pipeline Volumes............................................................................15 2007 PM Peak Hour Volumes Without Project......................................................... 16 7. 2007 PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project..............................................................17 DUNHAM MEDICAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION This study serves to investigate traffic impacts related to the accesses of the proposed Dunham Medical project. The primary goals of this study concentrate on the assessment of existing roadway conditions and intersection congestion, forecasts of newly generated project traffic, and estimations of future delay. Preliminary tasks include the collection of roadway information, road improvement information, and peak hour traffic counts. A detailed level of service analysis of the existing volumes is then made to determine the present degree of congestion on the network. Based on this analysis, forecasts of future traffic levels on the surrounding street system are determined. Following this forecast, the future service levels for the key intersections are investigated. As a final step, applicable conclusions and possible mitigation measures are defined. II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is a 19,660 square foot medical building located in the Federal Way area of King County. The project site is located on the west side of 6th Avenue S just north of S 336th Street. Access is to be provided by a new access on 6th Avenue, an existing shared access on S 336th Street, and an existing shared access on 1st Way S. Nearby land uses include a hospital and other medical or office developments. Figure 1 on the following page shows the site location and roadway map while Figure 2 shows the site plan and access configuration for the medical office project. III. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Surrounding Street Network The street network serving the proposed project consists of a variety of roadways. Primary streets serving the site are two-lane arterials and multi -lane state routes. i Characteristics for most roadways vary with respect to lane widths, grades, speeds, and function. Differences are based on specific roadway designations and proximity to major employment areas to the north. The major roadways and arterials surrounding the site are listed and described on page 6. J DUNHAM MEDICAL 6 HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC VICINITYMAF AND ROADWAY5Y5TEM Transportation and Civil Engineering FIGURE I DUNHAM MEDICAL HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC Transportation and Civil Engineering SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 6th Avenue South is a north -south roadway that borders the east edge of the project. The total roadway width is roughly 35 feet, with curbs and sidewalks. The speed limit is 25 mph. South 336th Street is an east -west multi -lane arterial that borders the north edge of the property. The posted speed limit is 35 mph, and lane widths are approximately 12 feet. Breaks in the raised median islands and turn lanes are provided at major intersections. Shoulders consist of curb/gutter, sidewalk/curb, or asphalt/grass sections. Grades are rolling with slopes of 0 to 6 percent. 9th Avenue South is a north -south arterial which lies to the east of the project. The posted speed limit along this road is 25 to 30 mph, while lane widths are each approximately 11 feet. A two-way left -turn lane is also provided. Shoulders are sidewalk/curb sections. Grades are generally level to rolling along the corridor with slopes ranging from 0 to 5 percent. South 320th Street is a major multilane east -west arterial that lies to the north of the project. The posted speed limit is 35 mph, and lane widths are 12 feet. Turn lanes are provided at major intersections. Shoulders are curb/gutter/sidewalk or curb/gutter section. Grades are mild with slopes of 0 to 5 percent. 1st Way South is a north -south multi -lane arterial that lies to the west of the project site. The posted speed limit is 35 mph with surfacing composed of asphalt concrete. Lanes are 11 to 12 feet wide. Shoulders are curb/gutter/sidewalk sections, and grades are rolling with slopes of 0 to 7 percent. South 348th Street is an east -west arterial that lies to the south of the project and has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Lanes are 11 to 12 feet wide, and shoulders are curb/gutter/sidewalk. Grades in the vicinity are level to rolling with 5 percent slopes. At the intersection with SR-99, 348th Street becomes SR-18. State Route 99, also named Pacific Highway, is a north -south, five -lane, major roadway which lies to the east of the site. Lane widths are approximately 12 feet and the posted speed limit ranges from 35 mph to 40 mph. Expanded lane configurations occur at major intersections, which provides designated turn lanes. Pavement surfacing consists of asphalt with gravel shoulders or curbs and sidewalks along the roadway edges. Grades near the project are modest with slopes of 0 to 4 percent. State Route 161, also named Enchanted Parkway, is a north -south multilane major roadway which lies to the east of the project site. Lane widths are generally 12 feet, while the posted speed limit in the vicinity is 40 mph. At the major intersection with SR-18/348th Street, two left turn lanes per direction are provided, as well as a channelized right turn lane in the northbound direction. Surfacing is asphalt; with curb/gutter/sidewalk shoulder sections. Grades are mostly level in the vicinity. 6 B. Roadway Improvements A review of the 2005 to 2010 City of Federal Way Road Improvement Program indicates several projects scheduled for the project vicinity. ,SR-99 @ S 324th through 340th: This improvement project includes construction of HOV lanes along the section, left turn lanes at 324th, a second left turn lane for northbound traffic at 336th, and finally a raised median for portions of this stretch of roadway. The total cost is expected to be $16,195,000. — Rel * ,U6*,Aar 1--- S 348th Street from 9th Avenue S to SR-99: This project involves the addition of HOV lanes, a 2nd NB left turn lane on SR-99, installation of a raised median, and underground utilities. The total cost is estimated at $4,350,000. N 320th Street @ I st Avenue S. Add a second NB and a second WB left turn lane, WB right turn lanes, and widen 1st Ave S to 5 lanes to 316th St. The cost is $4,200,000. ✓ S 348th Street @ I st Avenue S Improvements include addition of WB and SB right turn lanes, and 2nd EB and WB left turn lanes. The cost is $1,800,000. ✓ S 336th Street @ 1st Way S In addition to signal modifications, a WB right turn lane will be added and the SB left turn lane extended. The cost is $420,000. 1st Ave S between S 320th Stand S 330th St: Improvements along this stretch include improved access at 328th along with the installation of a raised median. Total cost of the project is expected to be $1,728,000. SR-18 @ SR-161:' Improvements to the intersection include the addition of EB and WB right turn lanes, a 3rd WB left turn lane, a 2nd NB right turn lane, and the addition of a 3rd lane on SR-161 SB to 352nd Street. The total cost is $4,500,000. 'S 336th Street @ 9th Avenue S. Signal modifications at a cost of $100,000. S 320th Street_from toA raised median will be installed and HOV lanes added at a cost of $6,444 00- ✓ C. Peak Hour Volumes Field counts for this study were taken during the evening peak period between the hours of 4 PM and 6 PM. The PM peak hour was used for analysis purposes since it generally represents the worst case scenario for most commercial developments with respect to traffic conditions. This is primarily due to the common 8 AM to 5 PM work schedule and the greater number of recreation and shopping trips associated with the late afternoon period. Residents typically return home after work during the same general time period of the day, which results in a natural peak in evening traffic when combined with traffic 7 oriented toward the project. Several of the counts were obtained from the City of Federal Way. Some old counts had to be used since construction is currently underway along Pacific Highway. Older counts were factored up by a 2.5% annual growth rate to approximate current volume levels. Shown in Figure 3 on the following page are the weekday PM peak hour volumes for the primary intersections. D. Level of Service Description Existing peak hour delays were determined using the Highway Capacity Manual. Capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS) which is an established measure of congestion for transportation facilities. LOS is defined for a variety of facilities including intersections, freeways, arterials, etc. A complete definition of level of service and related criteria can be found in the HCM. The methodology for determining the LOS at signalized intersections strives to determine the volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for the various intersection movements as well as the average control delay for those movements. Delay is generally used to measure the degree of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost time. Control delay, in particular, includes movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. Aside from the overall quantity of traffic, three specific factors influence signalized intersection LOS. These include the type of signal operation provided, the signal phasing pattern, and the specific allocation of green time. The methodology for determining the LOS at unsignalized intersections strives to determine the potential capacities for the various vehicle movements and ultimately determines the average total delay for each movement. Total delay is described as the elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Average total delay is simply the mean total delay over the entire stream. A number of factors influence potential capacity and total delay including the availability/usefulness of gaps. The range for intersection level of service is LOS A to LOS F with the former indicating the good conditions and the latter indicating the worst conditions with heavy control delays. Detailed descriptions of intersection LOS are given in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Existing LOS is shown in Table 1 on page 10. Level of service calculations were made using the Synchro 6 computer analysis program. The Synchro model was provided by the City of Federal Way. Timings, lanes, and other settings were left unchanged in the model, while volumes and peak hour factors were updated based on the existing counts shown in the appendix and Figure 3. Synchro output, found in the appendix, is based on HCM intersection capacity analysis. m4 �o K a qo v v O v c = a w w j'iy jay j'1� w v l� 'L v�i ry In iN p L.� Z N � Vql C N C N Did � Q O 1 qN l lot— N ❑ l N �r O w n q P Y O TABLE 1 Existing Level of Service Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay Xc 6th Ave/336th St Stop Northbound B 13.8 Southbound F 58.6 Eastbound LT B 0.2 Westbound LT A 0.3 9th Ave/336th St Signal Eastbound B 14.9 Westbound B 17.5 Northbound C 30.5 Southbound D 42.5 Overall C 24.7 0.62 SR-99/336th St Signal Eastbound F 94.3 Westbound E 63.0 Northbound C 32.9 Southbound D 36.6 Overall E 55.0 0.96 1 st Way/330th St Signal Eastbound E 69.6 Westbound D 44.2 Northbound C 27.9 Southbound C 33.5 Overall D 35.1 0.94 1st Way/320th St Signal Eastbound E 70.8 Westbound D 50.3 Northbound F 84.1 Southbound F 92.1 Overall E 70.6 1.02 SR-99/16th Ave Signal Westbound E 67.5 Northbound C 31.6 Southbound A 4.4 Overall B 11.6 0.41 SR-161/348th St Signal Eastbound C 32.6 Westbound D 43.6 Northbound F 84.0 Southbound E 70.8 Overall D 54.3 1.00 E. Non -Motorist Traffic Volumes Observations for pedestrian and bicycle activities were made at several road segments serving the site. Minor amounts of non -motorist activity were noted during peak hour counts and during other visits to the area. Based on the location of the proposed 10 development in relationship to areas that might attract non -motorist traffic, some light pedestrian traffic may be expected along the area roadways. F. Transit Service A review of the King County Metro Transit web site reveals one transit route providing service in the vicinity of the site. Route 182 provides service from the Federal Way Transit Center to Northshore Pkwy in northeast Tacoma, and travels along Pacific Hwy, 336th St, 9th Ave, and 348th St. The route makes stops in the project vicinity roughly from 6:00 AM to 8:30 PM. For a conservative analysis, no trip reductions were used in forecasting future traffic conditions. Refer to the King County Metro website (transit.metrokc.gov/1) for details on route stops and times. -- An-\ I—V.J' G. Sight Distance at Access Driveways An examination of the proposed new access driveway on 6th Avenue was made to determine whether adequate entering and stopping sight distance could be provided for inbound and outbound project traffic. According to AASHTO standards, a minimum entering sight distance of 335 feet is required for a 30 mph design speed. 6th Avenue has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Based on general field reviews, the proposed new access on 6th Avenue should be able to provide adequate sight distance. Some trees currently limit sight to the south to approximately 335 feet, however sight would be clear upon site development and removal of the trees. There is a dog leg just to the north of the project entrance. Bushes on the inside corner of the dog leg limit sight to the north of the proposed access to approximately 250 feet. Accounting for reduced speeds due to the dog leg, available sight distance should be adequate. General verification of sight 'distance should be done at the time of final review. _ vJv,b ,;11 �� cs : • �ti•��� H. Accident History A list of the recorded accide s provided by the City of Federal Way. Th 002. A summary of the accident totz ng page. t) �,Z� \�_4ct� . TABLE 2 Accident History Collisions Per Year Location 2000 2001 2002 SR-161 @ 348th St 23 20 48 16th Ave from SR-161 to SR-99 5 5 7 16th Ave @ SR-99 5 5 9 1st Ave @ 320th St 28 16 18 1st Ave @ 330th St 5 10 7 1st Way @ 336th St 12 5 8 6th Ave @ 336th St 0 0 2 9th Ave @ 336th St 6 2 3 336th St from 9th Ave to SR-99 2 0 1 SR-99 @ 336th St 22 19 21 SR-99 from 16th Ave to 336th St 2 0 0 As shown in the table, most accidents tend to occur at intersections, with the SR-161 @ 348th St, 1st Ave @ 320th St, and SR-99 @ 336th St locations seeing the most collisions. These intersections handle large volumes of traffic, increasing the chance for collisions. These aforementioned intersections are scheduled for or are currently undergoing improvements to add turning or through lanes. Most of the accidents are either rear end or right angle collisions. The majority of accidents were property damage only. While accidents cannot be totally eliminated due to the human and vehicle elements, accidents due to problems with the roadway design elements can be reduced. However, the area roadways have adequate sight distance and no notable geometric problems. The inclusion of Dunham Medical traffic would not be expected to increase the rate of accidents at these locations. IV. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. Trip Generation Trip generation is used to determine the magnitude of project impacts on the surrounding street system. This is usually denoted by the specific number of trips, which enter or exit a site during a designated time period. Generation data was taken from the well-known Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation, Seventh Edition. The specific land use for this site is Medical -Dental Office Building (LUC 720). ITE average rates were used as directed by the City of Federal Way. Table 3 on the following page gives a summary of project traffic for the r19,660 sf project. Average Daily Traffic and AM and PM peak hour volumes are given. 12 TABLE 3 Project Trip Generation 19.66 tgsf Medical -Dental Office Building Time Period Volume AWDT 710 vp& AM Peak Inbound 39 vph AM Peak Outbound 10 vph AM Peak Total 49 vph' PM Peak Inbound 20 vph PM Peak Outbound 53 vph PM Peak Total 73 vpl As shown in the table, the AM peak hour is expected to have roughly 33% fewer trips than during the PM peak hour. The inbound/outbound split for the PM peak is 27 percent entering and 73 percent exiting. B. Trip Assignment and Distribution The destination and origination of future project traffic primarily dictates how trips will disperse at nearby intersections. Trips generated by the project are expected to follow the general pattern shown in Figure 4. The distribution used has been determined in collaboration with the City of Federal Way. The split on the adjacent roadways is 30% to the North along 1 st Way S with 10% to proceed to 330th St, 10% west on S 320th, and 10% north on 1 st Way S. 20% is expected to travel southerly with 10% southbound on 1st Ave S and 10% southerly on 9th Ave S. The remaining 50% will split east with 10% to the north along Pacific Highway, 20% to the east along S 336th St, and 20% to the south along Pacific Highway. C. Future Traffic Volumes The owners of the project anticipate a completion date for the build out of this project by 2007. The year 2007 was used as the horizon study year. Future 2007 traffic volumes without the project were derived by applying a 2.5 percent annual growth rate to the volumes of Figure 3. The 2.5 percent rate is an anticipated rate provided by the City of Federal Way and is based on modeling, anticipated growth in regional land development, and traffic patterns. In addition, pipeline volumes from the Vintage 1 and FWASC projects were included for future volume estimations. Pipeline volumes are shown in Figure 5. Future 2007 PM peak hour volumes without the project (background growth and pipeline) are shown in Figure 6. Future 2007 PM peak hour volumes with project traffic included are shown in Figure 7. 13 7 \h o N 1 o+-O OJ 1 ll�+-O N —lo. ® 4— F -O ON a-A� 1� Ul u0 0 0 m o o O O 1" O v� ® fir=m��® ��--U O O Off" O O •O \TRH_/ I O 0 O o—� ® �—N o—► ® Fo ®` o O� 1 �O �N� � �p 4 - 0 v r - a C ER N (I�OI O N u+t;: �� O�S � �lD° ° 41 O O O _ 0� 0 0❑ U—rl Ue— o—► f-O ovN V m � ®c 41 '2 ® 4- �--IN.® 4--N I�JI P V � �N N� � �T N N 9 $ n o � P � � y 'ter g_ p T41 F T T P T T P N N _ N � � —► ®�N m—► ®moo �► ®` � � T Fof P� �T Q W a v 7 O U � v C .w W r E� OL) U)'o QJ U,m U_ o lu 10 Ex a N W m rTi F U � z •c �v v �.m HW dr U L) O N'o J U5m Q LU 0. F a � m Q x� L D. Future Level of Service The results of the future level of service analysis are given in Table 4 shown below. These results were again determined using the Synchro analysis program. For this future analysis, the signalized intersections were given cycle lengths no longer than 120 seconds. Intersection improvements noted in the Federal Way TIP were also incorporated for the analysis. TABLE 4 2007 Level of Service Without and With Project Without Proiect With Project Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay Xc LOS Delay Xc 6th Ave/336th St Stop Northbound B 14.3 B 14.2 Southbound F 79.4 F 81.5 Eastbound LT B 10.8 B 10.9 Westbound LT A 8.5 A 8.5 9th Ave/336th St Signal Eastbound B 16.0 B 17.1 Westbound B 19.4 C 21.1 Northbound C 28.3 C 23.9 Southbound D 41.2 D 40.5 Overall C 25.0 0.66 C 25.3 0.69 SR-99/336th St Signal Eastbound D 52.7 D 54.4 Westbound D 51.6 D 52.3 Northbound D 44.0 D 44.5 Southbound D 53.9 D 54.4 Overall D 50.8 10.9& D 51.6 0.99' 1st Way/330th St Signal Eastbound E 70.9 E 70.7 Westbound D 38.0 D 38.0 Northbound C 28.5 C 29.5 Southbound E 56.7 E 57.6 Overall D 43.6 0.96 D 44.4 0.97 1st Way/320th St Signal Eastbound D 42.6 D 42.8 Westbound D 42.1 D 42.3 Northbound D 39.6 D 39.8 Southbound E 59.3 E 59.7 Overall D 44.9 0.85 D 45.0 0.85 SR-99/16th Ave Signal Westbound D 38.7 D 38.8 Northbound B 19.4 B 19.4 Southbound B 14.0 B 14.2 Overall B 15.7 0.46 B 15.9 0.47 18 SR-161/348th St Signal Eastbound D 43.5 D 43.8 Westbound D 39.3 D 39.4 Northbound D 53.0 D 53.1 Southbound D 37.4 D 37.4 Overall D 42.5 0.82 D 42.7 0.82 1 st Ave/Access Stop Westbound RT - - B 13.4 336th St/Access Stop Southbound RT - - B 11.7 6th Ave/Access Stop Eastbound - - A 9.8 Northbound LT - - A 3.5 As shown in the table, the addition of project traffic is expected to generally have little effect on project delays. Most approaches at the key intersections listed are expected to have significant delays without or with project traffic included. The threshold for City of Federal Way is a maximum Xc ratio of 1.00 and a minimum level of service of LOS E for signalized intersections. E. Left Turn Lane Warrants For this impact study, procedures described by the WSDOT Design Manual Figure 910- 0��o 9a were used to ascertain left turn lane requirements on 6th Avenue S at the project entrances. The shared existing entrances on 336th Street and 1st Way are restricted to right -in right -out operation due to raised medians. The results of this assessment indicate that a left turn lane would not be needed on 6th Avenue at the project entrance. A summary of the results and the applicable nomograph is given in the appendix. Refer to the WSDOT Design Manual for detailed descriptions of the methods used. V. CONCLUSIONS AND MITIGATION The Dunham Medical project is located on the west side of 6th Avenue S just north of S 336th Street. The project consists of 19,660 square feet of medical/dental office space. Roughly 710 daily trips would be created on a typical weekday of which approximately 73 trips are expected into and out of the site during the PM peak hour. During the AM peak hour, 49 total trips are expected to be generated. Pedestrian/bicyclist traffic along the major roadways is presently minor to moderate. Transit service is provided on 336th Street near the project. Existing delays are shown in��- Table 1. Existing delays are generally moderate to heavy at the key intersections. Future delay conditions in the area are outlined in Table 4. With added project -related trips, some increases in intersection delay would be realized at the key intersections. The City of Federal Way has several roadway improvements in the project vicinity according to the 2005-2010 Transportation Improvement Plan. Intersections in the TIP 19 that will receive 10 or more PM peak hour project trips include: S 320th St @ 1 st Ave S, SR-18 @ SR-161, and S 336th St @ 9th Ave S. The corridor improvements of SR-99 and 1st Ave S would also receive 10 or more project trips for certain portions. Proposed mitigation is pro-rata share contribution towards the Federal Way TIP projects that would receive 10 or more PM peak hour project trips. Dollar amounts would be ' Y (Cl based on Dunham Medical PM peak hour trips, total PM peak hour volumes, and the TIP project cost as provided by the City of Federal Way. No other mitigations are identified. 20 DUNHAM MEDICAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX 21 J LEVEL OF SERVICE The following are excerpts from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual - Transportation Research Board Special Report 209. Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service (LOS) is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six LOS are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each level, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and the driver's perception of those conditions. Level -of -Service definitions The following definitions generally define the various levels of service for arterials. Level of service A represents primarily free -flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are seldom impeded in their ability to maneuver in the traffic stream. Delay at signalized intersections is minimal. Level of service B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. The ability to maneuver in the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and delays are not bothersome. Level of service C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the average free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Level of service D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free -flow speed. Level of service E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of one- third the free -flow speed or less. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. 22 Level of service F characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds, from less than one- third to one -quarter of the free -flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with long delays and extensive queuing. These definitions are general and conceptual in nature, and they apply primarily to uninterrupted flow. Levels of service for interrupted flow facilities vary widely in terms of both the user's perception of service quality and the operational variables used to describe them. For each type of facility, levels of service are defined based on one or more operational parameters that best describe operating quality for the subject facility type. While the concept of level of service attempts to address a wide range of operating conditions, limitations on data collection and availability make it impractical to treat the full range of operational parameters for every type of facility. The parameters selected to define levels of service for each facility type are called "measures of effectiveness" or "MOE's", and represent available measures that best describe the quality of operation on the subject facility type. Each level of service represents a range of conditions, as defined by a range in the parameters given. Thus, a level of service is not a discrete condition, but rather a range of conditions for which boundaries are established. The following tables describe levels of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of average control dew. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time, as well as time from movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. Level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is determined for each minor movement. Signalized Intersections - Level of Service Control Delay per Level of Service Vehicle sec A <_10 B > 10 and :520 C > 20 and <_35 D > 35 and :555 E > 55 and :580 F > 80 23 Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay per Vehicle sec <_10 >10and <_15 >15and <_25 >25 and :535 >35 and <_50 > 50 As described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, level of service breakpoints for all - way stop controlled (AWSC) intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from distinct kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an AWSC intersection. Thus a higher level of control delay is acceptable at a signalized intersection for the same level of service. AWSC Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay per Vehicle sec <_10 >10and<_15 >15and <_25 >25and <_35 > 35 and 1550 > 50 24 Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 19.66 Th.Gr.Sq.Ft. of Medical -Dental Office Building February 10, 2005 Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 36.13 10.18 1.00 710 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 1.96 0.00 1.00 39 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.52 0.00 1.00 10 j 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 2.48 1.94 1.00 49 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 1.00 0.00 1.00 20 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 2.72 0.00 1.00 53 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 3.72 2.50 1.00 73 1 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter 2.39 0.00 1.00 47 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit 1.23 0.00 1.00 24 AM Pk Hr, Generator, Total 3.62 2.38 1.00 71 PM Pk Hr, Generator, Enter 1.78 0.00 1.00 35 PM Pk Hr, Generator, Exit 2.67 0.00 1.00 52 PM Pk Hr, Generator, Total 4.45 2.50 1.00 87 Saturday 2-Way Volume 8.96 9.17 1.00 176 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 2.07 0.00 1.00 41 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 1.56 0.00 1.00 31 Saturday Peak Hour Total 3.63 1.93 1.00 71 Sunday 2-Way Volume 1.55 1.80 1.00 30 Sunday Peak Hour Enter 0.21 0.00 1.00 4 Sunday Peak Hour Exit 0.19 0.00 1.00 4 Sunday Peak Hour Total 0.40 0.00 1.00 8 Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 7th Edition, 2003. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS s j Lcx-is�3-)Jo uiiagr rviap rags 111L1J.// VVW "I" Uy-. V11//1V1UV1J/laVaaaV/vLaJuavJJVVvaavaaaavYv... CITY OF Federal Way PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 1 1,992 1 } F 805 9 3 2 530 285 m m M 90 1w 222 77 zo- 466 1w INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME iIN 2,783 OUT 2,783 DATE OF COUNT: Mon. 3/4/02 998 1,187 32 47S 150 ,aaI arm I -1A& 628 S 336TH St. @ 1 ST WAY S 2.5 % ANCI VA1. 6R0%AT9 /•ATE APfLI E D W C 7y ,sf 3y 1,12$ -lat Y53 in HV=HeavyVehicles P HF - Peak Hour Factor TIME OF COUNT: 4:30 PM - 5:15 PM of 1 2/10/2005 10:17 AM Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 r:rnr inc Prinfarl_ I lnchiftari File Name : untitled1 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01/18/2005 Page No : 1 6TH AVE S 336TH ST S 6TH AVE S 336TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru Left Right I Thru I Left Right I Thru Left Ri ht I Thru ILeft Int. Total 11 Factor 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 04:00 PM 11 2 6 5 197 12 17 0 0 1 120 0 371 04:15 PM 8 0 5 4 189 4 17 0 1 1 120 1 350 04:30 PM 11 1 9 3 188 9 8 0 2 1 94 0 326 04.4. 5 PM 16 1 8 1 254 13 22 0 3 1 102 3 424 Total 46 4 28 13 828 381 64 0 6 4 436 4 1471 05:00 PM 16 1 8 1 232 05:15 PM 10 0 17 1 222 05:30 PM 8 1 5 2 185 05:45 PM 5 0 61 1 162 Total 39 2 361 5 801 Grand Total 85 6 64 18 1629 Apprch % 54.8 3.9 41.3 1.1 95.0 Total % 3.0 0.2 2.3 0.6 57.7 9 14 1 1 1 109 2 395 8 12 0 2 0 80 2 354 7 4 0 3 1 97 3 316 51 8 0 0 1 98 2 288 2929 1 3333 1 61 3 384 9 1353 671 102 1 12 7 820 13i 2824 3.9 88.7 0.9 10.4 0.8 97.6 1.5 94 3.6 0.0 0.4 0.2 29.0 0.5 6TH AVE S Out In Total �85 �664 87 Right Thru Left North 3 is w � o C 9 _- 1118120054:00:00PM #-2 n /18/2005 5:45:00 PM 0) r- � r r� N lJnshifled ? m O 1 R od Leffg Thru Right 12 7 102 80 115 195 Out In Total AVES Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : untitled1 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01/18/2005 Page No : 2 6TH AVE S 336TH ST S 6TH AVE S 336TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound StartTime Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru . Left App Total Right Thru Left Total Total Total Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak i of 1 Intersection 04:30 PM Volume 53 3 42 98 6 896 39 941 56 1 8 65 3 385 7 395 1499 Percent 54.1 3.1 42.9 0.6 95.2 4.1 86.2 1.5 12.3 0.8 97.5 1.8 04:45 16 1 8 25 1 254 13 268 22 0 3 25 1 102 3 106 424 Volume Peak Factor 0.884 High Int. 05:15 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM Volume 10 0 17 27 1 254 13 268 22 0 3 25 1 109 2 112 Peak Factor 0.907 0.878 0.650 0.882 61HAVE 5 Out In Total 14 98 112 53 3 42 �t T� L L+ N O N� 1 ti I In vortM fh W W 118/2005 4:30:00 PM 4—z N 111812D05 5:15:00 PM � n .. M tlnshiRed0 R N N A - Left TT P,r 8 1 56 Z 65 110 Out fn Total Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 CSmurkq Printed- tlnshifted File Name : untitled4 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01/12/2005 Page No : 1 9TH AVE S 336TH ST S 9TH AVE S 336TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time R' ht I Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Right Thru I Left Ri ht I Thru I Left Int. Total Factor 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1 04:00 PM 32 37 33 26 127 22 34 28 35 25 85 22, 506 04:15 PM 32 30 48 21 128 16 33 39 39 25 98 17 526 04:30 PM 29 43 33 17 145 11 29 26 35 15 90 151 488 04:45 PM 33 45 491 14 160 171 27 34 28 31 92 12 1 542 78 560 6�6 1 123 127 137 Total 126 155 1631 96 365 66 2062 05:00 PM 28 42 66 14 153 13 23 29 26 15 112 17 538 05:15 PM 43 49 54 25 211 8 16 38 18 20 110 11 603 05:30 PM 29 29 50 11 153 16 24 30 21 10 86 11 470 05:45 PM 32 29 32 11 190 16 13 19 29 11 100 8 490 Total 132 149 202 61 707 53 76 116 94' 56 408 471 2101 Grand Total 258 304 3651 139 1267 119 199 243 231 152 773 113 4163 Apprch % 27.8 32.8 39.4 9.1 83.1 7.8 29.6 I 36.1 34.3 14.6 74.5 10.9 I Total % 6.2 7.3 8.8 3.3 30.4 2.9 4.8 5.8 5.51 3.7 18.6 2.7 9TH Out In Total 495 927 1422 258 304 365 Rigid ThrU Left * 4 I O North nk V s c r 1112120D5 4:00:00 PM m 112QM 5:45:00 PM -� M wr r� O rn� N - Left Thru RI ht 231 243 199 575 673 1248 Out In Total 9TH AVE S Start Time ` Right Thru V Left App. Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Pet Intersection 04:30 PM Volume 133 179 202 514 Percent 25.9 34.8 39.3 05:15 43 49 54 146 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 05:15 PM Volume 43 49 54 146 Peak Factor 0.880 Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 70 669 49 788 8.9 84.9 6.2 25 211 8 244 05:15 PM 25 211 8 244 0.807 File Name : untitled4 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01 /12/2005 Page No : 2 9TH AVE S 336TH ST S Northbound Thru Left I App' Total Right _Eastbound Thru Left f App. I Total Int. Total 95 127 107 329 28.9 38.6 32.5 16 38 18 72 04:30 PM 29 26 35 90 0.914 81 404 55 540 2171 15.0 74.8 10.2 20 110 11 141 603 • 0.900 05:00 PM 15 112 17 144 0.938 ; 9 Out In Total 252 514 766 1331 179202 Right Thru Left T +1 North L a W -1 112l2005 4:30:00 PM m .r /12/2005 5:15:00 PM rn 00 Unshmed A o 0 m to m — Left Thr M 10 12T 95 309 329 638 Out In Total 9TH VE 5 tcx-JKHy(q)Jjjb image Niap rage napaiwww.ciryoireaeraiway.conv IOIUCrSinomei oUSmeSSeconomicae... s63 ,& Federal Way PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 1 3.006 1 � 1,572 o: 293 1298 /02 ,272' .ers v O_ Ifoo 1,1s2 444 AW 1128 asr 1,434 211 I'M 56 �86• .843- .52' INTERSECTION 91 X PEAK HOUR VOLUME 00 1,745 1,191 IN 4,603 OUT 4,603 2,936 DATE OF COUNT: Thu. 617/01 J J 'pfI J SR 99 ib S 336TH STREET 2, S / ANNOAL GR61VTN RATE APPLICD -1a 129 -39e- 425 658 4-43' CV a-- 561 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor TIME OF COUNT: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM 2/10/2005 10:20 AM tcx-i way(ubjju linage ivlap rage 11up.,,vvww.LiLyuiicuciaivvay.wlluiulucl„uv1111-'I CITY OF Federal Way PM PEAK HOURTURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM L 7,081 i I2.5 VA L GtQ%*TH 9.47-6 APPL 1 ED ca a 990 ED 2 280 730 22 .lid -sw .21- Y 724 0 323 6 .8' Ilq 44-3- co d INTERSECTIONPEAK HOLJR-V( IN 2A4 � DATE OF COUNT:-Mon__4(1102 1313 �yeS 127 20 1,344 1 2.157 1 1ST VURY S 0. SW330TH ST � 16 .Y 7 E27 HV = Heavy Vehicles PW = Peak Hour Factor TIME OF COUNT: 4A5.PM - 52112M ' of 1 2/10/2005 10:21 AM wx-iAveUaaszu image iviap rage 11L1p:/ / W W W X1Ly U11CUC1 ill W ily.L:U111/ 1U1UCIS/ 11U111C/ UUS111CSS0L:U11U1WL:U0... ,i§CITY OF & Federal way PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 1 1,503 1 co 77s co 193 49G 128 ..*W3- 1 122-- 811 6'fi� &43- toy fig' 1n INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME IN 4,242 OUT 4,242 DATE OF COUNT: MorL 4/1102 725 287 474 315 Q-7�5- I A4R- 1 .30& 898 1,026 1.924 1 SW 320th ST. @ 1st WAY S. 2.5 `,, A10NvAL GRoWTI) RATE APPL1 E0 4*5- 18 it _1415- 1192 1,627 327- 3 S'4 kn-,� HV PHF SB 0.89 NB 0.89 WB 0.96 EB 0.92 INTRS. 0.96 HV = Heavy Vehicles PHF = Peak Hour Factor TIME OF COUNT: 5:00 PM - 5:45 PM of 1 2/10/2005 10:22 AM Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road File Name : untitled3 Puyallup, WA 98371 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01 /11 /2005 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted SR-99 16TH AVE S SR-99 Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Right I Thru I Left Right I Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total Factor 1.01 1.0-L 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 04:00 PM 0 144 154 7 0 4 3 98 0 410 04:15 PM 0 135 185 3 0 1 1 87 0 412 04:30 PM 0 146 180 3 0 2 2 100 0 433 04:45 PM 0 161 168 4 0 0 2 94 0 429 Total 0 586 687 17 0 7 8 379 0 1684 05:00 PM 0 151 177 4 0 3 4 84 0 423 05:15 PM 0 182 174 4 0 5 1 102 0 468 05:30 PM 0 123 180 6 0 2 4 100 0 415 05:45 PM 0 120 158 2 0 1 3 97 0 381 Total 0 676 689 16 0 11 12 383 0. 1687 Grand Total 0 1162 13761 33 0 18 20 762 0 ! 3371 Apprch % 0.0 45.8 54.2 64.7 0.0 35.3 2.6 97.4 0.0 Total % 0.0 34.5 40.8 1.0 0.0 0.5. 0.6 22.6 0.0 Out to Total 795 2538 0 1152 1376 Ttlru left 1 1 �O I m North °f � m z 11112005 4:00:00 PM C 111/2D05 5*45:00 PM m m �x mcn Unshlfted �ht TFuu R 762 20 1180 782 1962 Out ]n Total SR-99 Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 SR-99 16TH AVE S ! Southbound Westbound Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru 1 Left TAoptal Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:30 PM Volume 0 640 699 1339 15 0 10 Percent 0.0 47.8 52.2 60.0 0.0 40.0 05:15 Volume 0 182 174 356 4 0 5 Peak Factor High Int. 05:15 PM 05:15 PM Volume 0 182 174 356 4 0 5 Peak Factor 0.940 SR-99 Out In Total 395 13311 j7 640 69$ Thai eft 1 4 IT l1112005 4:30:00 PM 1111!$00.5 5:15:00 PM UnShiPoed T r Thru RON 380 9 650 �389 1039 Out to Total SR99 File Name : untitled3 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01 /11 /2005 Page No : 2 SR-99 Northbound App' Right Thru Left Total 25 j 9 380 0 2.3 97.7 0.0 9 1 102 0 1 05:15 PM 9 1 102 0 0.694 A P: Int. Total 389 1753 103 468 0.936 103 0.944 u;x-3A101lW3.J40 ullayc ivlaV ra6v, 11Llr/./ / YY YY YY . V 1��' V aa�.U6.a Ya v� aa� . �a/1au av+ua.a .ai a+�alav/ ai 4.f � � �a..a.,�-� v+� a+• CITY OF Federal Way PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS DIAGRAM 1,733 Z�; F992] 741 co 37 629 377 a� N 3 9 -a�r 1,Z50 )Oil 462" U y .Z5t INTERSECTIONPEAK HQLjft- `r oc IOUT 75:781;�i 1,560 Soy 48 Y23 .2Q9- 463' 1,118 1 2.678 1 7,5 % AAINUAL GRowTt1 RATE APPLIED 272 co 0 v HV = Heavy VeNcles PHF = Peak Hour Factor SR 1610. S 3481h ST (SR 18) DATE OF COUNT: F TIME OF COUNT: 4*120 PM - 6-00 PM ' of 1 2/10/2005 10:24 AM Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 r,rnitm Printar♦_ I tnahiffari File Name : untitled2 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01/20/2005 Page No : 1 1ST WAYS ENTRANCE 1ST WAY S Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Right I Thru I Left Right I Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Int. Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 04A0 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 260 0 263 04:15 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 279 0 283 04:30 PM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 285 0 291 04.45 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 298 0 302 Total 0 0 0 16 0 0 1 1122 0 1139 05:00 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 261 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 280 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 270 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 264 0 Total 0 0 0 20 0 0: 1 1075 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 36 0 0 j 2 2197 0 Apprch % 0.0 0-0 0.0 I 100.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.1 99.9 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 98.3 0.0 1ST WAY 5 Out in Total 22331 1 01 1 2233 0 0 Thru Uft o � 1Jc th m Z !20MM 4:W00 PM 120/2005 5:45:00 PM , m n Urdifted 0 �ht Thru Ri 299'T 2 2199 2199 Out In Total ISTWAYS 268 285 276 267 1096 2235 1ST WAY S Southbound Start Time Right Thru Left ak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Pea Intersection 04:30 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 04:45 Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : untitled2 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01/20/2005 Page No : 2 ENTRANCE 1ST WAY S Westbound Northbound To Right I Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total al Total Total 1 - - 0 21 0 0 21 1 1124 0 1125 1146 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 99.9 0.0 01 3 0 0 3 1 298 0 2991 302 0.949 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 0 7 0 0 7 1 298 0 299 0.750 0.941 1ST WAY S Out In Total 1145 0 1145 0 0 Left 1 L+ O NT th an 120120054:36:DDPM z a y 12012DD5 5:15:00 PM r� �C' -� in m Unstufted 0 w Thru REht 1124 1 DO 1125 1125 Out In Total 1ST Ly Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 r;rnHnc Printwi- I lnshiffed File Name : untitled1 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01 /20/2005 Page No : 1 ENTRANCE 336TH ST S 336TH ST S Southbound Westbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru I Left Ri ht I Thru I Left Right I Thru Left lnt. Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 04:00 PM 1 0 0 5 163 0 0 0 0 169 04:15 PM 1 0 0 2 180 0 0 0 0 183 04:30 PM 0 0 0 3 239 0 0 0 0 242 04:45 PM 1 0 0 2 244 0 0 0 0 247 Total 3 0 0 12 826 0 0 0 0 841 05:00 PM 1 0 0 1 226 0 0 0 0 228 05:15 PM 2 0 0 3 231 0 0 0 0 236 05:30 PM 0 0 0 2 190 0 0 0 0 192 05:45 PM 1 a 0 2 166 0 0 0 0 169 Total 4 0 ❑ 8 813 0 0 0 0! 825 Grand Total 7 0 0 I 20 1639 0 0 0 0 1666 Apprch % 100.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 98.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 98.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ENTRANM Out In Total 20 7 1 27 7 0 Right Left m �o m North F G J� Z. 0 — c 112020054:00:00PM 3 Y m 2 1l2012005 5:45:00 PM L �2 Q� � v llnshiRed � Om c�iim m— Heath & Associates Inc. Transportation Division 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : untitled1 Site Code : 00002295 Start Date : 01/20/2005 Page No :2 ENTRANCE 336TH ST S 336TH ST S Southbound Westbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru r Left App Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:30 PM I Volume 4 0 0 4 9 940 0 949 0 0 0 0 953 Percent 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 99.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04:45 Volume 1 0 0 1 2 244 0 246 0 0 0 0 247 Peak Factor 0.965 High Int. 05:15 PM 04:45 PM 3:45 00 PM Volume 2 0 0 2 2 244 0 246 Peak Factor 0.500 0.964 ENTRANCE Out In Total 4 73 4 0 R1gM Left I c o North � x — 1=2005 4:30:00 PM _ ' 1/2012005 5:15:00 PM rM F�f2 A Unsnlned °� Ad HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: S 336 St & 6th Ave S EXISTING VOLUMES 'A ,,(- 4- t II2/10/2005 t Movement ESL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR N6L NBT NBR 88L SST . SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 0 4 r *T r Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% -1 % 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 7 385 3 39 896 6 8 1 56 42 3 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 8 438 3 44 1018 7 12 2 86 46 3 58 Pedestrians 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 780 pX, platoon unblocked 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 vC, conflicting volume 1035 451 1133 1589 240 1452 1587 532 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 873 451 987 1520 240 1360 1518 287 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 96 91 98 89 39 97 90 cM capacity (veh/h) 658 1104 143 95 751 76 95 601 ,on, t.an # EB 1 EB 2 . EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 N8 2 SB I SB 2 Volume Total 8 292 149 44 679 346 14 86 49 58 Volume Left 8 0 0 44 0 0 12 0 46 0 Volume Right 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 86 0 58 cSH 658 1700 1700 1104 1700 1700 135 751 77 601 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.17 0.09 0.04 0.40 0.20 0.10 0.11 0.65 0.10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 3 0 0 8 10 73 8 Control Delay (s) 10.5 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 34.7 10A 113.8 11.6 Lane LOS B A D. S F B Approach Delay (6) 0.2 0.3 13.8 58.6 Approach LOS B F jffiefs il8urrimary Average Delay 4.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT 1: S 336 St & 6th Ave S 2/11 /2005 --* ---► --* '- 1- t I P. 1 41 Movement EBL EBT ESR 131- WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ 0 *T r *T iff Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% -1 % 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 7 404 3 41 941 6 8 1 59 44 3 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0-88 0.88 0.88 0.65 0.65 0-65 0.91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph) 8 459 3 47 1069 7 12 2 91 48 3 62 Pedestrians 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream -signal ft) 780 p} , platoon unblocked 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 vC, conflicting volume 1086 472 1188 1666 251 1523 1664 558 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 903 472 1025 1599 251 1427 1597 269 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 96 90 98 88 25 96 90 cM capacity (veh/h) 624 1084 129 82 739 65 82 600 Orreetian; l:�rie # - " EB 1 = EB 2 N8 1 N6;2 SB E 513 2 Volume Total 8 306 156 47 713 363 14 91 52 62 Volume Left 8 0 0 47 0 0 12 0 48 0 Volume Right 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 91 0 62 v cSH 624 1700 1700 1084 1700 1700 121 739 65 600 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.18 0.09 0.04 0.42 0-21 0.11 0.12 0.79 0.10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 3 0 0 9 10 91 9 Control Delay (s) 10.8 0.0 0.0 8-5 0.0 0.0 38.6 10.6 160.1 11.7 Lane LOS B A E B F B Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0A 14.3 79.4 •"°° Approach LOS B F nnte�secl ion 5uirir-h* Average Delay 6.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 1: S 336 St & 6th Ave S 2/11/2005 Movement E13L EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR. Lane Configurations tT+ 0 + Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 0% -1 % 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 7 404 3 41 941 18 8 1 59 44 3 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0,88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0,88 0-65 0.65 0.65 0,91 0.91 0.91 Hourly flow rate (vph)' 8 459 3 47 1069 20 12 2 91 48 3 62 Pedestrians 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh] Upstream signal (ft) 718 780 pX, platoon unblocked 0.82 0.82 0,82 0.82 0.82 0.82 vC, conflicting volume 1100 472 1188 1680 251 1530 1671 565 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 901 472 1008 1609 251 1426 1598 248 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6-5 6.9 7-5 6-5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 96 91 98 88 24 96 90 cM capac.4 (veh/h) 614 1084 130 80 739 64 81 608 Direction; Lane:# : EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 -11V8-1 . Vi182 'lIVB 3:.= hi6.3 ,N62 r-S$'f Volume Total 8 306 156 47 713 377 14 91 52 62 Volume Left 8 0 0 47 0 0 12 0 48 0 Volume Right 0 0 3 0 0 20 0 91 0 62 cSH 614 1700 1700 1084 1700 1700 122 739 64 608 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.18 0.09 0,04 0.42 0.22 0.11 0,12 0.80 0.10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 3 0 0 9 10 92 8 Control Delay (s) 10.9 0.0 0,0 8.5 0.0 0.0 38A 10.6 164.8 11.6 Lane LOS B A E B F B Approach Delay (s) 0-2 0.3 14.2 81.5 Approach LOS B F r, eisec on. ,- Average Delay 6.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52,8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis EXISTING VOLUMES 4046: S 336 St & 9 Av S 2/10/2005 --!* f *- 4 -*\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR WSL 1NBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT $BR Lane Configurations tT+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -1% 2% -4% Total Lost -time (s) 5.0 5-0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0-99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1,00 0-99 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0-95 1,00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3453 1782 3531 1741 1708 1793 1763 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.50 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 3453 1782 3531 574 1708 935 1763 Volume (vph) 55 404 81 49 669 70 107 127 95 202 179 133 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0-94 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.91 0-91 0-91 am 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 59 430 86 60 826 86 118 140 104 230 203 151 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 8 0 0 41 0 0 41 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 499 0 60 904 0 118 203 0 230 313 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 6-0 35.3 4.9 34.2 19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 35.3 4.9 34-2 19.8 19.8 19.8 19.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.47 0.07 0.46 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5-5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 143 1625 116 1610 152 451 247 465 v/s Ratio Prof', w 0.03 c0-14 0.03 c0.26 0.12 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 c0-25 v/ciRatio 0.41 0.31 0.52 0.56 0.78 0-45 0.93 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 32.8 12.3 33.9 14.9 25.6 23.0 26-9 24-7 Progression Factor 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0-5 1.6 1.4 19.9 0.3 38.4 3-0 Delay'(s) 33.5 12.8 35.5 16.3 45.5 23.3 65A 27.7 Level of Service C B D B D C E C Approach Delay (s) 14.9 17.5 30.5 42.5 Approach LOS B B C D Elite rsEciiviQS u m m a ry HCM Average Control Delay 24.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycfe Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT 4046: S 336 St & 9 Av S 2/11/2005 Move-66 }t .: EOL EBT . -'EBR WBL -WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tT+ Ideal -Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -1 % 2°/a -4% Total Lost -time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1-00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1-00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 0-94 Flt Protected 0-95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1-00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3454 1782 3530 1742 1703 1794 1763 Flt Permitted 0.95 1-00 0.95 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.48 1.00 8a4d. Flow (0erm) 1787 3454 1782 3530 570 1703 908 1763 Volume (vph) 58 424 85 53 703 74 112 133 106 212 188 140 Peak -hour factor. PHF 0.94 0.94 0-94 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 62 451 90 65 868 91 123 146 116 241 214 159 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 9 0 0 41 0 0 38 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 62 523 0 65 950 0 123 221 0 241 335 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected -Phases 5 2 1 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.0 33.7 5.0 32.7 20.8 20.8 20-8 20.8 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 33.7 5.0 32.7 21.3 21.3 21.3 21.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.45 0.07 0.44 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 143 1552 119 1539 162 484 258 501 v/S.Ratio Prot , 0.03 c0.15 0.04 c0.27 0.13 0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0-22 c0.27 vIC Ratio 0.43 0.34 0.55 0.62 0.76 0.46 0.93 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 32.9 13.4 33.9 16.3 24.5 22A 26.2 23.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.6 2.7 1-9 16A 0.3 37.9 2.6 Delay (s) 33.6 14.0 36.6 18-2 40.9 22.3 ' 64A 26.4 Level of Service C B D B ❑ C E C Approach Delay (s) 16.0 19-4 28.3 41-2 Approach LOS B B C D [ntersectiori summary HCM Average Control Delay 25.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume 6o0apac ty ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68-5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min), 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 4046: S 336 St & 9 Av S 2/11 /2005 Movement - EBL t BT EBR VVBL WST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT S,BR Lane Configurations 1 0 *1 tT11 Vi T T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -1 % 2% -4% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0,95 1,00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0,99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 0,94 Flt Protected 0,95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0,95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3454 1782 3531 1742 1703 1794 1765 Flt Permitted 0,95 1.00 0,95 1.00 0.33 1.00 0,50 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 3454 1782 3531 607 1703 939 1765 Volume (vph) 58 424 85 53 713 74 114 133 106 239 193 140 Peak --hour factor, PHF 0,94 0.94 0.94 0,81 0.81 0.81 0.91 0.91 0.91 0,88 0.88 0 88 Adj. Flow (vph) 62 451 90 65 880 91 125 146 116 272 219 159 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 9 0 0 40 0 0 36 0 Lane Group Flaw (vph) 62 522 0 65 962 0 125 222 0 272 342 0 Conff. Peds. (#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 Turn Type Prot Prat Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 8 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.0 32.0 5.0 31.0 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 32.0 5.0 31.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.43 0.07 0.41 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 143 1474 119 1459 186 522 288 541 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.15 0.04 c0.27 0.13 0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0,21 c0.29 v/c Ratio 0.43 0,35 0.55 0.66 0.67 0.43 0.94 0.63 Uniform Delay, d1 32.9 14.5 33.9 17.7 22.7 20.7 25.4 22.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Incremental delay, d2 0.8 0.7 2.7 2.3 7.3 0.2 37.8 1.8 Delay (s) 33.6 15.2 36.6 20.1 30.0 20.9 63.1 24.1 Level of Service C B D C C C E C Approach Delay (s) 17A 21.1 23.9 40.5 Approach LOS B C C D I>?terse�ioii�5i:i�sirr:ary _ HCM Average Control Delay 25.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis EXISTING VOLUMES 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 2/10/2005 Movement E13L . EBT EBR WBL WBT . WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT S13R Lane Configurations t r tT )) ttT I tot r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1'.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1661 1792 1496 1660 3252 3368 4913 1796 5120 1550 Fit Permitted 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 201 1792 1496 325 3252 3368 4913 1796 5120 1550 Volume(vph) 400 446 428 154 425 129 211 1016 56 102 1298 293 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (v"" 444 496 476 181 500 152 220 1058 58 106 1352 305 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 145 0 21 0 0 4 0 0 0 23 Lane Group Flow (vph') 444 496 331 181 631 0 220 1112 0 106 1352 282 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #Ihr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 59.7 42.1 42.1 41.5 29.9 11.2 49.6 13.2 51.6 75.4 Effective Green, g (s) 61.2 43.6 43.6 43.5 30.9 11.7 50.1 13.7 52.1 77.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.22 0.08 0.36 0.10 0.37 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.o 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 352 558 466 221 718 281 1758 176 1905 857 #i v/s Rao'Prot _ N c0.23 0.28 .0.07 0.19 c0:07 0.23 0.06 c0.26 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.32 0.22 0.18 0.12 v/c Ratio 1.26 0.89 0.71 0.82 0.88 0.78 0.63 0.60 0.71 0.33 Uniform Delay, d1 43.2 45.9 42.6 39.0 52.7 62.9 37.3 60.5 37.5 17.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.65 1.12 1.00 0.60 Incremental Delay, d2 138.6 15.5 4.2 19.6 11.5 11.9 1.7 3.9 2.2 0.1 Belay- s) 181.8 61.3 46.9 58.5 64.2 69.3 25.8 71.6 39.8 10.3 Level of Service F E D E E E C. E ❑ B Approach Delay (s) 94-3 63.0 32.9 36.6 Approach LOS F E C D HCM Average Control Delay 55.0 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140,0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 2/11/2005 Moverizent .. EBL EBT EBR WBL WST WBR NBL NST NBR . - 88L SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r Vi tT )) ttT+ +f t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5-0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 0.95 0.97 0-91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1-00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.'00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0-95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1661 1792 1499 1658 3253 3368 4915 1796 5120 1562 Fit Permitted 0-12 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 0-95 1.00 0-95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 213 1792 1499 613 3253 3368 4915 1796 5120 1562 Volume (vph) 423 469 450 162 447 136 222 1074 59 107 1367 309 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0-85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0-96 0-96 Adj. Flow (vph) 470 521 500 191 526 160 231 1119 61 111 1424 322 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 149 0 25 0 0 5 0 0 0 23 Lane Group Flow (vph) 470 521 351 191 661 0 231 1175 0 111 1424 299 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 59.3 44.4 44.4 35-7 26.8 9.5 33.7 9.5 33.7 60.2 Effective Green, g (s) 60.8 45.9 45.9 37-7 27.8 10.0 34.2 10.0 34.2 62.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.31 0.23 0.08 0.29 0.08 0.29 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 446 685 573 279 754 281 1401 150 1459 810 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.29 0-06 0.20 c0.07 0.24 0.06 c0.28 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm c0-29 0.23 0.16 0.11 v/c Ratio 1.05 0.76 0.61 0-68 0.88 0.82 0-84 0.74 0.98 0.37 Uniform Delay, d1 35.8 32.3 29.9 32.7 44.5 54.1 40.3 53.7 42.5 17.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0-86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 57.5 4.5 1.4 5.4 10.9 16.1 6.0 15-7 18.5 0.1 Delay (s) ' 93.3 36.8 31.2 38.1 55.4 61.6 40.5 69-4 61.0 17.3 Level of Service F D C ❑ E E D E E B Approach Delay (s) 52.7 51.6 44.0 53-9 Approach LOS D D D D IntEisec 66,Surnmary HCM Average Control Delay 50.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98 _ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91-8% ICU Level of Service . F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group--=�m New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S t II2/11/2005 t llilovemerit EBL EST EBR VVBL WBT WBR NSL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I + if ttT Vi ttt if Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1-00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prof) 1661 1792 1499 1659 3254 3368 4915 1796 5120 1562 Flt Permitted 0-12 1,00 1-00 0.33 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 213 1792 1499 579 3254 3368 4915 1796 5120 1562 Volume (vph) 428 480 461 162 451 136 226 1074 59 107 1367 311 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 476 533 512 191 531 160 235 1119 61 111 1424 324 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 149 0 24 0 0 5 0 0 0 23 Lane Group Flaw (vph) 476 533 363 191 667 0 235 1175 0 111 1424 301 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#//hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 59.4 44.5 44.5 35.8 26-9 9.5 33-6 9.5 33.6 60.1 Effective Green, g (s) 60.9 46.0 46.0 37.8 27.9 10.0 34-1 10.0 34.1 62-1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.32 0.23 0.08 0.28 0.08 0.28 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 446 687 575 271 757 281 1397 150 1455 808 v/s Ratio: Prot c0.25 0.30 0.06 0.21 c0.07 0-24 0-06 c0.28 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 0.24 0.16 0.11 vlc Ratio 1.07 0.78 0.63 0.70 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.74 0.98 0.37 Uniform Delay, d1 35.8 32.5 30.1 32.7 44.5 54.2 40A 53.7 42.6 1T3 Progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 61.7 5.0 1.7 6.6 11.4 17.7 6A 15.7 19.0 0-1 b61ay�s) 97.5 37.5 31.8 39-4 55.9 63.3 40.7 69.4 61.6 17.4 Level of Service F D C D E E D E E B Approach Delay (s) 54.4 62.3 44.5 54-4 Approach LOS ❑ 10 D D In- tersection' SuM__ -ary HCM Average Control Delay 51.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 C Critical"Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis EXISTING VOLUMES 3640: SW 330th St & 1 Av S 2/10/2005 --v t Movement EBL EBT : EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL' NBT _ NSI SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ T+ tT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -4% 3% 7%n -5% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 0-95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1-00 0.95 1-00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1745 1567 1583 1492 1708 3385 1791 3411 Fit Permitted 0.74 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.25 1-00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1355 1567 912 1492 126 3385 463 3411 Volume (vph) 214 6 119 5 7 16 465 927 20 22 730 288 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0-75 0-75 0.75 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 258 7 143 7 9 21 567 1130 24 24 811 320 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 113 0 0 17 0 0 1 0 0 29 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 258 37 0 7 13 0 567 1153 0 24 1102 0 Confl- Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.8 28.8 28.8 2&8 100.7 100-7 51.9 51.9 Effective Green, g (s) 29-3 29.3 29.3 29.3 100.7 100.7 51-9 51.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.72 0.72 0.37 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5-5 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 5-0 5-0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 284 328 191 312 586 2435 172 1265 v/s Ratio Prot 0-02 0.01 c0.30 0.34 &32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.01 c0-39 0-05 We Ratio 0.91 0.11 0.04 0.04 0-97 0.47 0-14 0.87 Uniform Delay, d1 54.0 44.8 44.1 44.2 41.3 8.4 29.2 40.9 Progression'.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.66 0.63 Incremental Delay, d2 29.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 28.1 0.6 1.6 8.2 Delay (s) 83.9 44.9 44.1 44.2 67A &6 20.9 33.8 Level of Service F D ❑ D E A C C Approach Delay (s) 69.6 44.2 27.9 33.5 Approach LOS E D C C Inte'rSR11 ri`Mummn HCM Average Control Delay 35.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.5% ICU Level of Service E ` Analysis Pericd (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT 3640: SW 330th St & 1 Av S 2/11/2005 iVlnveinent EBL EBT EB_JR WK WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL 88T . =SBR Lane Configurations I T, I T Vi tT Vi TT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -40/6 36/6 76/6 -66/. Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.05 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1572 1587 1490 1708 3385 1796 3417 Flt Permitted 0.74 1.00 0:55 1.00 6.09 1100 0.23 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1358 1572 914 1490 153 3385 435 3417 Volume (vph) 225 6 125 5 7 17 489 979 21 23 768 303 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj._ Flow (vph) 271 7 i51 7 9 23 596 1194 26 26 853 337 RTGR Reduction (vph) 0 120 0 0 18 0 0 1 0 0 35 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 271 38 0 7 14 0 596 1219 0 26 1155 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm Perm pm}pt Perm Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.4 24.4 24.4 24.4 85.1 85.1 42.0 42.0 Effective Green, g (s) 24.9 24.9 24.9 24.9 85.1 85.1 42.0 42.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0,21 0.21 0.71 0.71 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 326 190 309 602 2401 152 1196 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.01 c0.M 0.: 0.34 ; v/s Ratio Perm c0.20 0.01 c0.39 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.99 0.51 0.17 0,97 Uniform Delay, d1 47A 38.6 38.0 38-0 35.1 7.9 27.0 38.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 Incremental Delay, d2 42.6 0A 0-0 0.0 34.0 0.8 2.4 19.0 Delay (s) 89.7 38.7 38.0 38.1 69.1 8-7 29-4 57-3 Level of Service F ❑ D D E A C E Approach Delay (s) 70.9 38.0 28.5 56-7 Approach LOS E D C E Ciitersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 43.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 3640: SW 330th St & 1 Av S 2/11/2005 � - '.- 4% T � � J Movement ,�BL EBT EBR WBL ' WBT ' W8R NSL NBT NBR 'SBI SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (-/.) 4% 3% 7% -5% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1572 1587 1490 1708 3386 1796 3417 Flt Permitted 0.74 1.00 0.54 1.00 0:09 1.00 0.23 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1358 1572 907 1490 153 3386 429 3417 Volume (vph) 225 6 127 5 7 17 494 990 21 23 772 303 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 271 7 153 7 9 23 602 1207 26 26 858 337 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 121 0 0 18 0 0 1 0 0 34 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 271 39 0 7 14 0 602 1232 0 26 1161 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 6 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 6 2 7 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 24A 24A 24.4 24.4 85.1 85.1 42.0 42.0 Effective Green, g (s) 24.9 24.9 24.9 24.9 85.1 85.1 42.0 42.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.71 0.71 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension fs] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 282 326 vls Ratio Prot 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm c0.20 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.12 Uniform Delay, dl 47.1 38.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 42.6 0.1 Delay (s) 89.7 38.7 Level of Service F D Approach Delay (s) 70.7 Approach LOS E Infers- 66666.SUrr ma 188 309 602 2401 0.01 c0.32 0.36 0.01 0.04 0.04 38.0 38.0 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.0 38.0 38.1 ❑ D 38.0 D c0.39 1.00 35.3 1.00 36.7 72.0 E 0.51 8.0 1.00 0.8 8.8 A 29.5 C 150 1196 0.34 0.06 0.17 0.97 27.0 38.4 1.00 1.00 2.5 19.8 29.5 58.2 C E 57.6 E HCM Average Control Delay 44.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.3% ICU Level of Service ;`E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis EXISTING VOLUMES 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2/10/2005 -► 4--- 1,- A\ I ` Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r tT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (o) 5% _1% -1 °/a 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5-0 5.0 5-0 5-0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1-00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0-98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1-00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1-00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1742 3255 1722 3462 1767 1828 1497 1750 3244 Flt Permitted 0-95 1.00 0.95 1,00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.13 1-00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 3255 1722 3462 207 1828 1497 238 3244 Volume (vph) 104 644 104 344 1182 184 289 474 315 128 496 193 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 113 700 113 358 1231 192 325 533 354 144 557 217 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 28 0 30 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 804 0 358 1414 0 325 533 326 144 744 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 38-0 32.5 60.0 55.0 39.7 72.2 41.8 31.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 38.0 32.0 60.0 55.0 39.7 71.7 41.3 31.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0-07 0.27 0.23 0.43 0.39 0.28 0.51 0.30 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 124 884 394 1484 293 518 767 181 718 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.25 0.21 c0-41 c0.15 0.29 0.10 0.06 0.23 v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 0:12 0.118 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.11 1.03 0.42 0.80 1.04 Uniform Delay, d1 64.6 49.3 52.6 386 43.0 50.2 21:3 41.0 54.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.88 1.00 1.08 0.95 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 53.4 14.9 19A 12.0 84.0 46.2 0.1 %8 43.5 Delay (s) 118.0 64.2 67.2 46.1 127.1 100.3 20.3 60.7 98.0 Level of Service F E E D F F C E F Approach Delay (s) 70.8 50.3 84.1 92.1 Approach LOS E D F F I•i ie"rse6t3r1 Surnrna HCM Average Control Delay 70.6 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2/11/2005 4,\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR W13C 1 07T : WBR -NSU NBT NBR S L SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi t1 tt r Vi� f t r tT.) Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util_ Factor 1.00 0-95 0.97 0.95 1-00 0.97 0-95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/tikes 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0-97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1-00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0:95 1.00 '.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1742 3257 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1495 1748 3248 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1-00 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 3257 3355 3563 1552 492 3472 1495 446 3248 Volume (vph) 109 677 109 361 1242 193 304 503 331 134 522 203 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0-92 0.92 0-96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0-89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 118 736 118 376 1294 201 342 565 372 151 587 228 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 96 0 0 67 0 34 0 Lane Group Flow (vp6) 118 843 0 376 1294 105 342 565 305 151 781 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 HeaZ.vy Vehicles (°/o} 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 10/0 ; Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.1 43.8 16.5 50.2 50.2 40.0 29.6 46.1 41-4 30.3 Effective Green, g (s) '9:6 434,8 16.0 50.2 50.2 39.5 29.6 45.6 40.9 30.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.36 0.13 0-42 0.42 0.33 0.25 0.38 0.34 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5-0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 139 1189 447 1491 649 406 856 568 267 820 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.26 0.11 c0.36 c0.07 0-16 0.07 0-05 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.21 0.13 0-14 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.71 0.84 0.87 0-16 0.84 0.66 0.54 0-57 0.95 Uniform Delay, d1 54.5 32.6 50.8 31.9 21-8 32.5 40.7 29.0 29.5 44.1 Progression Factor 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 34.4 3.6 12.9 7.1 0.5 14.1 1.5 0.5 1.6 20A Delay (s) 88.9 36.2 63.6 39.0 22-3 46.6 42.2 29.5 31.1 64.5 Level of Service F ❑ E D C D D C C E Approach Delay (s) 42-6 42.1 39.6 59.3 Approach LOS D ❑ D E terSeCtljil7rnmarjF HCM Average Control Delay 44.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0-85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2/11/2005 Mail ent EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T M tt r M tt r tT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1960 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Utit. Factor 1-00 0-95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1-00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1742 3255 3355 3563 1552 3456 ,3472 1495 1748 3248 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.13 7 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 3255 3355 3563 1552 49& l 3472 1495 439 3248 ,+L Volume (vph) 109 677 111 361 1242 193 309 509 331 134 52`4k : 203 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 118 736 121 376 1294 201 347 572 372 151 589 228 RTQR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 96 0 0 66 0 34 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 118 846 0 376 1294 105 347 572 306 151 783 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm pm+pt prn+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.1 43.7 16.5 50.1 50.1 40.2 29.7 46.2 41.4 30.3 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 43.7 16.0 50A 50.1 39.7 29.7 45.7 40.9 30.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.36 0.13 0.42 0.42 0.33 0.25 0.38 0.34 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 139 1185 447 1488 648 409 859 569 265 820 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.26 0.11 c0.36 c0.07 0.16 0.07 0.05 c024 v/s Ratio Perm 0,07 0.21 0.13 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.71 0.84 0.87 0.16 0.85 0.67 0.54 0.57 0.95 Uniform Delay, d1 54.5 32.8 60.8 32.0 21.8 32A 40.7 28.9 29.5 44.2 Progression Factor 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay; d2 34A 3.7 12.9 7.2 0.5 14.5 1.5 0.5 1.7 20.8 Delay (s) 88-9 36.5 63-6 39.2 22.4 46-9 42.2 29A 312 64.9 Level of Service F D E D C ❑ ❑ C C E Approach Delay (s) 42.8 42.3 39.8 59.7 Appr9pch10S D ❑ D E n#e ectiort5urrima �_;, .,a �µHCM HCM Average Control Delay 45.0 Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis EXISTING VOLUMES 4250: 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 2/11/2005 I l I t Movement �;= : , .. '1lVBL 11V13f� NBT NBR; 'SBL' _ S,6T ,: Lane Configurations )y 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 5-0 Lane Util. Factor 0,97 0.95 0.97 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0,95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3347 3326 3268 3356 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3347 3326 3268 3356 Volume (vph) 25 0 380 9 699 640 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.69 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 0194 Adj. Flow (vph) 36 0 404 10 744 681 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 36 0 413 0 744 681 Confl. Peds. (#!hr) 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 7% 7% 8% 8% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 3 5 5 1 1 3 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 48A 68A 121.8 Effective Green. g (s) 7.2 49.4 68.4 122.8 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.05 0,35 0.49 0.88 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 S Lane Grp Cap (vph) 172 1174 1597 2944 vls Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.12 c0.23 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.21 0.35 0.47 0.23_ Uniform De lay. d1 63.7 33.5 23-7 1.3 Progression Factor 1.06 0.94 0.34 0.12 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 Delay(s)� ` 67.5 31.6 8.1 0.3 Level of Service E C A A Approach Delay (s) 675 31.6 4.4 Approach LOS E C A �nterseetiari.Summ�ry - - - HCM Average Control Delay 11.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140-0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT 4250: 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 2/11/2005 Zavenr�fu"'- :: W-BL ;11VBR':= N8T ;_ N6R=BL' SST Lane Configurations )y tT M ¢T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0-95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3347 3327 3268 3356 Flt Permitted 0.95 1-00 0.95 1.00 Satd- Flow (perm) 3347 3327 3268 3356 Volume (vph) 27 0 406 9 734 675 Peak -hour, facfor, PHF 0.69 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 39 0 432 10 781 718 RTOR'Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 0 440 0 781 718 Confl. Peds.'(#/hr) 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 7% 7% 8% 8% Bus Blockages (#%hr) 3 5. 5 1 1 3 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 7.1 34.0 32.9 71.9 Effective Green, g (s) 7.1 35.0 32.9 72.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.39 0.37 0.81 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 264 1294 1195 2718 v/s Ratio Prot c0-01 c0.13 c0.24 0.21 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.15 0.34 0.65 0.26 Uniform Delay, d1 38.6 19.4 23.8 2.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0-1 0.1 1.0 0.2 Delay (s) 38.7 19.4 24.8 2.3 Level of Service ❑ B C. A Approach Delay (s) 38.7 19A 14-0 Approach LOS D B B UM HCM Average Control Delay 15.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 4250: 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 2/11 /2005 ,Or- t � � 1 M'6vemenf WI3L . VVBR NOT NBR. SBL ._ 557 Lane Configurations )Y tt lVi tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% 0% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3347 3327 3268 3356 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3347 3327 3268 3356 Volume (vph) 31 0 406 9 745 675 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.69 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 45 0 432 10 793 718 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 0 440 0 793 718 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 7% 7% 8% 8% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 3 5 5 1 1 3 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) T 1 34.0 32.9 71.9 Effective Green, g (s) 7.1 35.0 32.9 72.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.39 0.37 0.81 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 264 1294 1195 2718 v/s Ratio Prot C0.01 c0.13 c0.24 0.21 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.17 0.34 0.66 0.26 Uniform Delay, d1 38.7 19.4 23.9 2.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0A 0A 1.1 0.2 Delay (s) 38.8 19A 26-0 2.3 Level of Service ❑ B C A Approach Delay (s) 38.8 19.4 14.2 Approach LOS D B B rPTQ-rSe8V6fiT _ mma HCM Average Control Delay 15.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis EXISTING VOLUMES 4850: S 348th St & 16 Av S 2/10/2005 Movement` EBL ` E6T 7 EBR '. WBL WBT WSR NBL N_ BT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) TtT )) ttT+ tt r )Vi tT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 2% -4% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0-95 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0,97 1.00 0,97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1-00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1718 4594 3345 4787 3259 3387 1467 3385 3448 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1-00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1718 4594 3345 4787 3259 3387 1467 3385 3448 Volume (vph) 39 1011 264 747 1420 292 304 448 423 377 628 37 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0-93 0-93 0-93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0-91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 42 1087 284 795 1511 311 334 492 465 444 739 44 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 34 0 0 22 0 0 0 341 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 42 1337 0 795 1800 0 334 492 124 444 780 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 1 1 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 41.0 32.0 65.8 13.0 21.9 21.9 21.1 30-0 Effective Green, g (s) 8.2 42.0 33.0 66.8 14.0 22.9 22.9 22.1 31.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0-06 0.30 0.24 0.48 0.10 0.16 0-16 0.16 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 &0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 101 1378 788 2284 326 554 240 534 763 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.29 c0.24 0.38 0.10 c0.15 0.13 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.0,8 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.97 1.01 0.79 1.02 0.89 0.52 0.83 1.02 Uniform Delay, d1 63.6 48A 53.5 30.7 63.0 57.3 53.5 57.1 54.5 Progression Factor 0.55 0.41 1.00 0.95 1.01 0.88 1.45 0.78 0.77 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 12.6 20.8 1.0 55-5 15A 0.8 10.1 38.1 Delay (s) 35.8 32.5 74.3 30.2 119.1 65.4 78.6 54.7 80.0 Level of Service D C E C F E E D E Approach Delay (s) 32.6 43.6 84.0 70-8 Approach LOS C D 1: ' - F E wrsection;5iirtam . HCM Average Control Delay 54.3 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140,0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 intersection Capacity Utilization 91.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITHOUT PROJECT 4850: S 348th St & 16 Av S 2/11 /2005 ven3�nr -156L - i±BT EBR WBi. WBT: VI113R NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +tt r ))) ttt r r� ttT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 2% -4% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.88 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1-00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 S2td. Flow (prot) 1718 4773 1487 4866 4939 1554 3259 3387 2590 3385 4958 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1718 4773 1487 4866 4939 1554 3259 3387 2590 3385 4958 Volume (vph) 41 1108 287 785 1507 307 324 471 444 396 660 39 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.85 0.85 0.85 Adj. F1ow (vph) 44 1191 309 835 1603 327 356 518 488 466 776 46 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 202 0 0 173 0 0 399 0 5 0 Lane broup Flow (vph) 44 1191 107 835 1603 154 356 518 89 466 817 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 0 0 1 1 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prat Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 34.6 34.6 22.0 49.4 49A 14.6 21.0 21.0 18.4 24.8 Effective Green, g (s) 8.2 35.6 35.6 23.0 50.4 50A 15.6 22.0 22.0 19A 25.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.19 0.42 0.42 0.13 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 117 1416 441 933 2074 653 424 621 475 547 1066 vls Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.25 c0.17 0.32 0.11 c0.15 0.14 c0.16 vls Ratio Perm 0.07 0.10 0:03 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.84 0.24 0.89 0.77 0.24 0.84 0.83 0.19 0.85 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 53.5 39.5 32.0 47.3 29.9 22.4 51.0 47.2 41.4 48.9 44.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1-00 1.00 0.70 0.67 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 6.2 1.3 10.7 2.9 0.8 13.1 9.0 0.1 11.6 3.0 Delay (s) 54.2 45.7 33.3 58.1 32.8 23.3 64.0 56.3 41.5 45.8 32-6 Level of Service ❑ ❑ C E C C E E D D C Approach Delay (s) 43.5 39-3 53.0 37.4 Approach LOS D D D ❑ h�;�rsectii�n"•$ummaryr HCM Average Control Delay _ 42.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 I HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 4850: S 348th St & 16 Av S 2/11/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR-. W8L WBT W8R NBL NBT NBR SBL ,S)T Big Lane Configurations ttt r )M ttt r tt rr Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1909. 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 -11 12 Grade (%) 20/6 -4% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1-00 0.91 1.00 0:94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.88 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0:95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1718 4773 1487 4866 4939 1554 3259 3387 2590 3385 4959 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.0,0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1718 4773 1487 4866 4939 1554 3259 3387 2590 3385 4959 Volume (vph) 41 1108 287 785 1507 310 324 472 444 404 663 39 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0-94 0.91 0-91 0-91 0.85 0.85 0-85 Adj. Flow (vph) 44 1191 309 835 1603 330 356 519 488 475 780 46 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 202 0 0 175 0 0 399 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 1191 107 835 1603 155 356 519 89 475 821 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1% 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 1 1 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 Turn Type Prat Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 34.4 34.4 22.0 49.2 49.2 14.6 21.0 21.0 18-6 25.0 Effective Green, g (s) 8.2 35.4 35.4 23.0 50.2 50.2 15.6 22.0 22.0 19.6 26.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.30 0-30 0.19 0.42 0.42 0.13 0-18 0.18 0.16 0-22 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 117 1408 439 933 2066 650 424 621 475 553 1074 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.25 c0.17 0.32 0.11 c0.15 0.14 c0.17 vls Ratio Perm 0.07 0.10 0-03 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.85 0.24 0.89 0.78 0.24 0.84 0.84 0.19 0.86 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 53.5 39.7 32A 47.3 30.1 22.5 51.0 47.3 41 A 48.9 44.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.67 tncrementdFl)elay, d2 0.7 6A 1-3 10:7 - ='"9 0.9 13.1 9.1 0.1 12.0 2.9 Delay (s) 54.2 46.2 33.5 58.1 33.0 23.4 64-0 56.4 41.5 46.1 32.3 Level of Service D D C E C C E E D D C Approach Delay (s) 43-8 39.4 53.1 37.4 Approach LOS D D D D - HCM Average Control Delay 42-7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 5: Entrance & 1 Wy S 2/11/2005 C � 4 %X *\ � MoVement WBL 1WBR SEL SET NWT NWR Lane Configurations t'+ Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% -5% 0% Votume (veh/h) 0 38 0 0 1186 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.90 0.90 0.94 0-94 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 51 0 0 1262 3 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 0:0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4-0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 0 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veil) Upstream signal (ft) 1065 401 pX, platoon unblocked 0.87 0.87 0.87 vC, conflicting volume 1283 652 1275 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1180 458 1170 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 89 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 159 479 519 �irectiofl:'! one"# WB 1 NW-- 1 NK 2 Volume Total 51 841 424 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 51 0 3 cSH 479 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.49 0.25 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 Control Delay (s) 13-4 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 13.4 0.0 Approach LOS B me rsecTon: S u rri m a ry Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 6: S 336 St & Entrance 2/11/2005 i'Vtoyement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL . St3R Lane Configurations tT+ Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1 % 0% Volume (veh/h) 0 0 988 9 0 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.50 0.50 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 1029 9 0 18 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 0.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ffls) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 337 1161 pX, platoon unblocked 0.90 0.90 0.90 vC, conflicting volume 1049 1054 539 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 943 949 378 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2-2 3.5 3-3 p0 queue free % 100 100 97 cM capacity (veh/h) 651 231 656 Direction; Lane # Wf3 1 :.WB 2 SB 1 - Volume Total 686 352 18 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 9 18 cSH 1700 1700 556 Volume to Capacity 0.40 0.21 0.03 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.7 Lane LOS 8 Approach Delay (s) 0.0 11.7 Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42. % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2007 VOLUMES WITH PROJECT 4: Entrance & 6th Ave S 2/11/2005 oven�ent - _ EB-L EBR NBL NBT SBT S6R Lane Configurations Y +T T _ Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume (vehlti) 32 0 12 14 103 6 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 36 0 13 16 114 7 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked VC, conflicting volume 180 138 131 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 con€ vol vCu, unblocked vol 180 138 131 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 96 100 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 791 898 1448 jrecti n- Lane#, E9 1: NB � 1 Volume Total 36 29 121 Volume Left 36 13 0 Volume Right 0 0 7 cSH 791 1448 1700 Volume to Capacity 0,04 0.01 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 1 0 Control Delay (s) 9.8 3.5 0.0 Lane LCS A A Approach Delay (s) 9.8 3.5 0.0 Approach LCS A ectron:5i�nzma:. ry - - - - - _ - - - -- Average Delay 2.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 22.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 New Coordinate Node Map 5:00 pm 2/24/2004 Existing PM Peak Plan Synchro 6 Report Heath & Associates, Inc. Page 1 City of Federal Way Corridor Report 2/7/2005 Deport Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 De corridor: 16 AV S between S 348 ST and SR 99 16 AV S at S 348 ST I ear: 2000 —� Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Mon-1/10/2000 12:50 PM 0000434 Right Angle G Mon-1/31/2000 09:52 AM 0001431 Sideswipe Sun-3/19/2000 05:07 PM 0003834 Sideswipe Tue-4/11/2000 11:51 AM 0004994 Right Angle Wed-4/12/2000 04:47 PM 0005240 Backing Sun-5/14/2000 04:45 PM 0006720 Sideswipe Thu-6/8/2000 02:50 PM 0007971 Backing Thu-7/13/2000 12:55 PM 0009778 Right Angle i Sat-8/19/2000 09:13 PM 0011701 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Sat-8/26/2000 12:27 PM 0012017 Sideswipe I{ — Sun-9/10/2000 02:22 AM 0012760 Rear End Fri-9/15/2000 02:00 PM 0013012 Approach Turn Sat-9/30/2000 09:56 PM 0013771 Sideswipe Mon-1.2/25/2000 11:04 PM 0017953 Sideswipe Yearly Totals: Number of 14 Collisions: .'ear: 2001 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Fri-2/16/2001 07:02 AM 0102310 Sideswipe Sun-2/25/2001 07:50 PM 0102789 Right Angle Mon-3/19/2001 07:00 PM 0103936 Right Angle Mon-6/4/2001 12:00 PM 0107961 Right Angle Thu-6/14/2001 05:57 AM 0108453 Approach Turn Fri-7/6/2001 03:05 PM 0019639 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Fri-7/6/2001 09:37 PM 0019659 Rear End Sat-7/21/2001 04:50 PM C31997 Rear End Mon-7/30/2001 05:12 PM 0110753 Approach Turn -Yearly Totals: Number of 9 Collisions: Page 1 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->E E->W P 2 E->W E->W P 2 E->W E->W P 2 W->E S->N P 2 N->S B P 2 E->W E->W P 2 E->W 1 5 E->N N->S P 2 N->S 1 1 W->E W->E P H 2 W->E W->E 1 1 E->S W->E P 2 N->S N->S P 2 W->E W->S P 2 Totals: 0 3 11 1 29 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->N E->W P 2 S->E W->E P 2 E->S S->N P 2 W->N N->S 1 2 E->S W->E P 2 S->N P 1 N->S N->S 1 4 N->S N->S P 2 W->E E->S P 2 Totals: 0 2 7 0 19 Year: 2002 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sat-1/12/2002 03:25 PM 0200621 Approach Turn S->W N->S P 2 Sun-1/20/2002 06:35 PM 0201044 Rear End N->S Prk 1 H 2 Sat-2/16/2002 08:38 PM 0202383 Rear End N->S Prk P 2 Tue-3/5/2002 08:10 PM 0203163 Right Angle E->N S->N P 2 Tue-3/12/2002 07:32 PM 0203461 Approach Turn E->S W->E 1 2 Sun-6/9/2002 03:20 PM 1247682 Sideswipe N->W E->S P 2 Tue-6/11/2002 03:33 PM 0208033 Sideswipe W->N W->E 2 2 Sun-7/14/2002 09:55 PM 029710 Sideswipe W->E S->E P 2 Thu-8/8/2002 12:05 PM 0210897 Right Angle E->W N->S P 2 Wed-9/11/2002 02:28 PM 0212536 Approach Turn S->W N->S P 2 Fri-9/13/2002 06:16 PM 0212655 Right Angle S->W E->W P 2 Thu-9/26/2002 05:38 PM 0213318 Rear End N->S B 1 2 Thu-10/3/2002 07:45 AM 0213618 Sideswipe S->W S->N P 2 Wed-11/6/2002 06:44 PM 0215316 Approach Turn E->S E->W 1 2 Sat-11/9/2002 07:55 PM 02015452 Sideswipe E->W E->W P 2 Sun-12/8/2002 03:35 PM 0216842 Right Angle W->E N->S P 2 —� Mon-12/9/2002 04:13 AM 0216860 Rear End N->S Prk P 2 Fri-12/2012002 04:07 PM 0217449 Approach Turn S->W N->S P 2 Yearly Totals: Number of 18 Totals: 0 6 13 1 36 Collisions: Link Totals: Number of 41 Totals: 0 11 31 2 84 Collisions: 16 AV S at S 347 PL Year: 2000 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sat-3/18/2000 11:14 AM 0003773 Right Angle W->N S->N P 2 Yearly Totals: Number of 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Collisions: Year: 2001 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Thu-3115/2001 10:21 AM 0103714 Approach Tum S->W N->S P 2 Sat-9/15/2001 03:45 PM 0112926 Sideswipe S->N S->N P 2 Yearly Totals: Number of 2 Totals: 0 0 2 0 4 Collisions: ear: 2002 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sun-8/18/2002 02:08 AM 0211386 Sideswipe N->S W->S P 2 early Totals: Number of 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Page 1 ollisions: Link Totals: Number of 4 ollisions: 76AVSatS344ST Fear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Wed-11/22/2000 01:20 AM 0016282 Right Angle Yearly Totals: Number of 1 Collision s: Year: 2001 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision 3"hu-5/31/2001 09:40 AM 0107748 Rear End early Totals: Number of 1 Collisions: 2002 ear: Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Thu-2/28/2002 02:24 PM 0202936 Right Angle Totals: Number of 1 �early Gllisions- Link Totals: Number of 3 Collisions: 16 AV S at S 341 PL Jear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Mon-2/28/2000 01:30 PM 0002782 Right Angle early Totals: Number of 1 ollisions: ear: 2001 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Fri-2/16/2001 06:30 AM C26257 Approach Turn Mon-6/18/2001 12:20 PM 0108640 Right Angle early Totals: Number of 2 Page 1 Totals: 0 0 4 0 S Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->W S->N P H 2 Totals: 0 0 1 1 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->S N->S P 2 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W->E S->N 1 2 Totals: 0 1 0 0 2 Totals: 0 1 2 1 6 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->S S->N 1 2 Totals: 0 1 0 0 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W->E E->S P 2 S->N E->W P 2 Totals: 0 0 2 0 4 Collisions: Year: 2002 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Sat-2/23/2002 07:33 AM 0202688 Right Angle Tue-5/14/2002 06:17 AM 0206637 Sideswipe Sat-7/27/2002 12:02 PM 0210348 Rear End Fri -I 1/29/2002 12:01 PM Yearly Totals: Number of 0216416 4 Right Angle Collisions: Link Totals: Number of 7 Collisions: 16 AV S at S 340 ST Year: 2000 ` Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision -1 Sat-2/12/2000 08:45 AM 0002027 Rear End 1 Tue-10/17/2000 02:33 PM 0014563 Rear End Yearly Totals: Number of 2 Collisions: ear: 2002 1 Date Time Of Case 1 Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Tue-11/12/2002 06:08 AM 0215571 Right Angle ]Yearly Totals: Number of 1 Collisions: Totals: Number of 3 ]Link Collisions: SR 99, 700 ft. S of 16 AV S rear: 2002 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Tue-611812002 02:39 AM 0208364 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Yearly Totals: Number of 1 -Collisions: Link Totals: Number of 1 Collisions: 16 AV S at SR 99 Page 1 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->E E->W 2 2 S->N S->N P 2 S->N S->N P 2 E->S S->N 1 2 Totals: 0 3 2 0 8 Totals: 0 4 4 0 14 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->S S->S P 2 S->N S->N 2 2 Totals: 0 2 1 0 4 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W->E S->N P 2 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Totals: 0 2 2 0 6 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->S P Totals: 0 0 1 0 Totals: 0 0 1 0 'ear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Tue-1/18/2000 07:50 AM 0000819 Other Mon-3/13/2000 08:47 PM 0003544 Rear End Thu-5/11/2000 11:25 AM 0006553 Sideswipe Tue-6/6/2000 05:13 PM 0007876 Sideswipe Wed-10/11/2000 08:00 AM early Totals: Number of 0014234 5 Rear End ollisions: —Fear: 2001 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Sat-1/6/2001 09:32 PM 010293 Rear End Tue-1/16/2001 07:53 PM 0100809 Rear End Wed-5/30/2001 04:35 PM 0108694 Rear End Wed-9/19/2001 10:48 AM 0113072 Sideswipe Mon-12/10/2001 04:50 PM 0116970 Sideswipe _.'early Totals: Number of 5 Jollisions: Year: 2002 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Mon-1/21/2002 02:06 PM 0201070 Rear End Fri-3/15/2002 06:24 PM 0203601 Rear End Thu-3/28/2002 03:53 PM 0204246 Rear End Tue-6/4/2002 09:15 AM 027752 Rear End Fri-7/12/2002 11:29 AM 029597 Rear End Mon-8/12/2002 05:00 PM 0211094 Right Angle Thu-10/3/2002 02:50 PM 0213638 Sideswipe Sun-11/3/2002 11:10 AM 0215161 Rear End Tue-11/12/2002 03:32 PM 0215569 Sideswipe Yearly Totals: Number of 9 `_ollisions: Link Totals: Number of 19 Collisions: Jotals for Corridor: of Collisions: 78 Dumber otal Vehicles Involved: 160 Number of Fatalities: 0 (0.00%) Number of Injuries: 17/21 (21.79%) umber ofPDOs: 61 (78.21%) Page 1 Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 S->N N N->S N->S S->N S->N S->E S->N S->N S->N Totals: Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 S->N S->E S->N S->N S->N S->N S->N S->E S->E Totals: Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 S->N S->N S->N S->N S->N S->N S->N S->N S->N B W->E S->N N->E N->E S->N S->N N->W N->S Totals: Num Num Fat Inj PDO P P P P P 0 0 5 Num Num Fat Inj PDO P P P 2 P 0 2 4 Num Num Fat Inj PDO 1 P P P P P P P P 0 1 8 Hit & Tot Run Veh 3 2 2 2 2 0 11 Hit & Tot Run Veh 2 H 2 3 2 2 1 11 Hit & Tot Run Veh W 1 Totals: 0 3 17 2 42 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 20 City of Federal Way Corridor Report 2/7/2005 Report Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 Corridor: 16 AV S between SR 18 and SR 99 16AVSatSR18 ear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Sat-2/5/2000 10:26 AM 0001674 Sideswipe jearly Totals: Number of 1 }Collisions: ear: 2001 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Fri-6/1/2001 01:59 PM 0107813 Rear End Thu-8/2/2001 05:30 PM 0110891 Sideswipe Thu-12/20/2001 04:37 PM 0117527 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Iearly Totals: Number of 3 llisions: ear: 2002 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Sat-7/13/2002 02:52 PM 029648 Rear End Sun-10/27/2002 05:56 PM 0214852 Rear End Fri-11/15/2002 06:50 PM 02015745 Sideswipe early Totals: Number of 3 ollisions: ink Totals: Number of 7 --Collisions: "6AVSatS348ST Year: 2000 j Page 1 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->N E->W P H 2 Totals: 0 0 1 1 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->S B P 2 W->N W->E P 2 E->W Prk P 2 Totals: 0 0 3 0 6 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->N B I 2 E->W E->W P 2 E->N E->W P 2 Totals: 0 1 2 0 6 Totals: 0 1 6 1 14 City of Federal Way Location Report 2/7/2005 Report Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 Location: 1 AV S at S 320 ST Year 2000 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Fri-1/14/2000 02:35 PM 0000654 Backing S->N 0 P 3 Sun-1/16/2000 08:06 PM 0000765 Rear End E->W E->W 0 P 2 Sun-2/20/2000 09:29 PM 0012527 Rear End E->W 0 P 3 Sat-2/26/2000 09:49 AM 0002702 Right Angle N->E E->W 1 2 Tue-2/29/2000 04:30 PM 0002844 Sideswipe E->W E->W 0 P 2 Wed-3/8/2000 07:20 AM 0003255 Head On N->S S->N 0 P 2 Tue-3/14/2000 07:10 AM 0003555 Right Angle E->W S->N 0 P 2 Sat-4/l/2000 12:05 PM 0004494 Rear End N->S N->S 0 P 2 Tue-4/11/2000 08:30 PM 0005030 Backing E->W B 0 P 2 Mon-5/l/2000 03:30 PM CO27742 Rear End S->N S->N 0 P 2 Mon-5/22/2000 04:28 PM 0009145 Sideswipe S->N S->N 1 3 Wed-5/24/2000 02:20 PM 0007226 Rear End E->W E->W 0 P 2 Sat-5/27/2000 09:35 PM 0007416 Backing E->W 0 P 3 Mon-6/5/2000 04:43 PM 0007835 Rear End S->N N->S= --O P 2 Thu-6/15/2000 07:10 PM 0008338 Rear End S->N S->N 0 1 3 Tue-6/20/2000 07:10 AM 0008559 Rear End S->N S->N 0 P 2 Fri-6/23/2000 07:30 PM C041069 Rear End W->E W->E 0 1 2 Mon-7/10/2000 03:34 PM 0009627 Backing S->N B 0 P 2 Mon-7/31/2000 10:30 AM 0010687 Rear End W->E W->E 0 1 H 3 Sun-8/20/2000 04:39 PM 0011738 Rear End E->W E->W 0 1 3 Wed-9/20/2000 01:10 PM 0013238 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle E->W Prk 0 P 2 Thu-9/28/2000 07:15 AM 0013630 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle E->W B 0 1 2 Sat-9/30/2000 12:17 PM 0013743 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle W->E 0 P 1 Fri-10/6/2000 05:10 PM C041985 Rear End W->E W->E 0 1 3 Sat-10/21/2000 11:50 PM 0014790 Rear End W->E W->E 0 1 2 Thu-11/9/2000 05:04 PM 0015672 Approach Turn S->N N->E 0 1 2 Wed-11/15/2000 01:13 PM 0015957 Right Angle E->S S->N 0 P 2 Wed-12/20/2000 03:30 PM 0017723 Right Angle E->N S->N 0 P 3 lumber of Collisions: 28 Totals: 2 8 18 1 64 Year 2001 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Mon-1/15/2001 07:57 AM 0100717 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle S->N Prk 0 P 3 Fri-1/26/2001 02:49 PM 011329 Rear End E->W B 0 P 2 Fri-1/26/2001 06:20 PM 0101340 Rear End E->W E->W 0 P H 2 Tue-2/20/2001 09:29 PM 0102534 Rear End E->W E->W 0 P 4 Pagel Tue-2/20/2001 09:29 PM 012527 Rear End E->W 0 P 3 Thu-3/15/2001 03:43 PM 013722 Sideswipe E->W E->W 0 1 3 Fri-3/30/2001 04:28 PM 0104489 Approach Turn N->E S->N 0 2 2 - Tue-5/29/2001 07:00 AM C30079 Sideswipe N->S N->W 0 P 2 1 Wed-6/13/2001 07:00 PM 0108441 Rear End N->S N->S 0 1 2 Tue-7/3/2001 02:10 PM 0019470 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle S->N Prk 0 1 2 Sun-8/5/2001 01:00 PM C30624 Rear End W->E W->E 0 P 2 Tue-9/4/2001 02:50 PM 0112382 Rear End W->E W->E 0 P 2 Thu-10/18/2001 06:45 AM 0114315 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle W->E Prk 0 P 2 Wed-11/28/2001 07:35 AM 0116395 Backing N->S 0 P 3 Thu-12/13/2001 08:48 PM 0117142 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 P 2 . 1 Sat-12/15/2001 02:26 PM 0117216 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle E->W Prk 0 P 2 Number of Collisions: 16 Totals: 0 5 12 1 38 l Year 2002 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sat-1/12/2002 12:08 AM 0200596 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 1 2 Tue-1/22/2002 05:18 PM 0201138 Approach Turn N->E S->N 0 P 2 Sat-1/26/2002 01:39 PM 031426 Rear End E->W 0 P 3 Sat-1/26/2002 10:00 AM 0201323 Right Angle S->N W->E 0 P 2 Fri-2/15/2002 06:07 PM 0202331 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 1 2 Thu-2/21/2002 05:00 PM 0217504 Rear End E->W E->W 0 P 2 j Mon-3/25/2002 06:33 PM 0204102 Right Angle E->S S->N 0 1 2 1 Wed-7/10/2002 08:04 AM 029481 Approach Turn S->E W->E 0 1 2 Sat-8/10/2002 03:43 PM 0210999 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 P 2 Thu-9/5/2002 08:19 PM 0212241 Rear End E->W E->W 0 P H 3 Sat-9/28/2002 1 07:34 PM 0213416 Rear End E->W E->W 0 P 2 Mon-10/7/2002 03:34 PM 0213822 Approach Turn N->E S->N 0 P 2 Tue-10/8/2002 06:06 AM 0213855 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 P 2 - Mon-10/21/2002 02:12 PM 0214522 Rear End E->W 0 1 3 Tue-11/12/2002 07:18 PM 0215582 Rear End E->W Prk 0 P 2 Wed-11/13/2002 05:30 PM 0215636 Approach Turn N->E S->N 0 P 2 Wed-11/20/2002 04:59 PM 0216016 Rear End W->E W->E 0 2 3 Wed-12/18/2002 06:09 PM 0217356 Rear End S->N S->N 0 1 2 Number of Collisions: 18 Totals: 0 8 11 1 40 Brand Totals: Number of Collisions: 62 Number of Vehicles Involved: 142 °!Number of Fatalities: 2 (3.23%) .Number of Injuries: 21/21 (33.87%) Number of PDOs: 41 (66.13%) Iollision Rate: 0.00 Pagel City of Federal Way Location Report 2/7/2005 -Teport Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 Location: 1 AV S at S 330 ST Year 2000 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Wed-1/12/2000 07:17 PM 0000564 Approach Turn W->N E->W 0 P 2 Wed-3/29/2000 02:57 PM 0004334 Approach Turn N->S S->W 0 1 2 Thu-4/20/2000 07:10 AM 0005450 Approach Turn W->N E->W 0 P 2 Mon-7/10/2000 08:10 AM C033108 Rear End S->N S->N 0 1 2 Sun-9/10/2000 02:30 PM C037889 Rear End N->S N->S 0 P 2 'lumber of Collisions: 5 Totals: 0 2 3 0 10 Year 2001 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Thu-1/4/2001 06:40 PM 01182 Approach Turn N->E S->N 0 P 2 Sun-2/18/2001 09:48 AM 0102390 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 P 2 Thu-2/22/2001 04:11 PM 0102630 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle N->S Prk 0 P 2 Thu-6/7/2001 08:30 AM 0108133 Rear End W->E W->E 0 P H 3 Fri-7/20/2001 07:52 PM 0110302 Approach Turn W->N E->W 0 2 2 Fri-8/3/2001 08:40 AM 0010913 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle N->S Prk 0 P 2 Wed-9/19/2001 06:18 PM 0113086 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 P 2 Wed-9/26/2001 04:09 PM 0113382 Rear End N->S N->S 0 P 2 Mon-10/8/2001 06:32 PM 0113906 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle E->N 0 P 1 Wed-12/5/2001 05:44 PM 0116721 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 2 2 umber of Collisions: 10 Totals: 0 4 8 1 20 Year 2002 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Fri-2/22/2002 01:55 AM 0202623 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle W->E 0 P 1 Thu-4/4/2002 12:11 PM 0204621 Right Angle E->W N->E 0 P 2 Mon-4/22/2002 05:35 PM 0205483 Approach Turn N->S S->W 0 1 2 Tue-4/23/2002 05:35 PM 0205529 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 P 2 Mon-4/29/2002 06:15 PM 0205875 Approach Turn N->S S->W 0 2 2 Wed-5/15/2002 01:00 PM 0206700 Approach Turn S->W N->S 0 P 2 Tue-10/1/2002 06:56 PM 0213545 Rear End N->S Prk 0 P 2 "umber of Collisions: 7 Totals: 0 3 5 0 13 Pagel rand Totals: Number of Collisions: 22 umber of Vehicles Involved: 43 umber of Fatalities: 0 (0.00%) umber of Injuries: 619 (27.27%) Number of PD©s: 16 (72.73%) lollision Rate: 0.00 I Pagel City of Federal Way Corridor Report 2/7/2005 Report Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 ;:orridor: S 336 ST between 1 WY S and SR 99 1 WY S at S 336 ST fear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Thu-1/6/2000 05:06 PM 0000264 Approach Turn 1 Sun-1/16/2000 04:32 PM 0000759 Rear End 1 Wed-2/2/2000 08:50 AM 0001520 Right Angle Tue-218/2000 04:30 PM CO27284 Right Angle Tue-2/8/2000 08:23 PM 0001846 Right Angle Tue-3/ 14•/2000 06:05 PM 0003588 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle J Sun-7/212000 11:42 PM 0009257 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Wed-8/30/2000 04:35 PM C040974 Rear End Fri-10/20/2000 Tue-12/5/2000 06:00 PM 10:02 AM C039154 0016945 Rear End Backing Tue-12/26/2000 03:27 PM 0017976 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Yearly Totals: Number of 11 Jollisions: Year: 2001 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Fri-5/11/2001 08:07 AM 0106652 Approach Turn J Fri-8/31/2001 11:25 AM 0112197 Backing Thu-11/22/2001 05:01 PM 0116117 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle early Totals: Number of 3 oilisions: Year: 2002 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Wed-1/9/2002 11:45 AM 0200446 Rear End Sun-3/10/2002 02:44 PM 0203360 Approach Turn Thu-5/2/2002 02:09 PM 0203020 Rear End Wed-6/19/2002 01:52 PM 0208441 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Page 1 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->W N->S P 2 E->W E->W 1 2 W->E N->S P 2 S->N E->S 1 2 N->S E->N P 2 S->N I 1 N->S P 1 W->E W->E 1 2 S->N S->N 1 2 Bck E->S P 2 N->S P 1 Totals: 0 5 6 0 19 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->N N->E 2 2 E->W B P 2 N->S P 1 Totals: 0 2 2 0 5 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->S B P 2 S->N N->E 2 2 N->S N->S P 2 S->N Prk 1 2 Sat-11/23/2002 08:05AM 0216147 Rear End early Totals: Number of 5 Collisions: Link Totals: ]dumber of 19 Collisions: iAVSatS336ST Year: 2002 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Mon-2/25/2002 10:24 AM 0202770 Approach Turn Mon-11/4/2002 11:18 AM 0215195 Right Angle Yearly Totals: Number of 2 ollisioas: ink Totals: Number of 2 Collisions: �AVSatS336ST - fear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Tue-1/11/2000 06:40 AM 0000468 Sideswipe Tue-3/28/2000 12:55 PM 0004272 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Tue-5/9/2000 02:02 PM 0006448 Backing Fri-7/21/2000 05:54 PM 0010218 Right Angle Wed-11/15/2000 09:51 PM 0015987 Approach Turn Wed-12/6/2000 06:31 PM 0017026 Right Angle Yearly Totals: Number of 6 Collisions: ear: 2001 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Mon-2/19/2001 01:13 PM 0102438 Approach Turn Fri-8/10/2001 10:49 AM 0011224 Right Angle early Totals: Number of 2 Icollisions: Year: 2002 JDate Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Thu-2/14/2002 01:00 PM 0217149 Sideswipe Fri-8/16/2002 07:00 PM 0211314 Right Angle Thu-8/29/2002 02:10 PM 0211905 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle Yearly Totals: Number of 3 Page 1 E->N E->N P 2 Totals: 0 3 3 0 10 Totals: 0 10 11 0 34 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->E S->N P 2 N->E E->W 1 2 Totals: 0 1 1 0 4 Totals: 0 1 1 0 4 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W->E W->N 2 2 N->S Prk P 2 S->N B P 2 N->S W->E 12 11 2 W->E E->S P 2 N->W E->W P 2 Totals: 12 13 4 0 12 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E->S W->E 2 2 E->W S->N P 2 Totals: 0 2 1 0 4 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->S N->W P 2 W->E S->N P 2 N->S P 1 Totals: 0 0 3 0 5 (Collisions: Link Totals: Number of 11 Collisions: S 336 ST 1,000 ft. W of 13 AV S ear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Fri-5/12/2000 11:40 AM 0006610 Right Angle Yearly Totals: Number of 1 )Collisions: Link Totals: Number of 1 Collisions: 13AVSatS336S'T ear: 2002 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Mon-7/22/2002 07:50 AM 02100870 Rear End early Totals: Number of 1 olllsiofts: Link Totals: Number of 1 Iollisions: S 336 ST. 600 ft. W of SR 99 Fear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Thu-9/21/2000 12:08 PM 0012385 Right Angle Yearly Totals: Number of 1 -ollisions: Link Totals: Number of 1 Iollisions: S 336 ST at SR 99 fear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Mon-1/17/2000 04:07 PM 0000794 Rear End Mon-1/24/2000 12:14 PM 0000144 Approach Turn Page 1 Totals: 12 15 8 0 21 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->E E->W P Totals: 0 0 1 0 Totals: 0 0 1 0 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W->E B P 2 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N->S E->W P Totals: 0 0 1 0 Totals: 0 0 1 0 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->N S->N P 3 E->S W->E P 2 Tue-2/8/2000 02:58 PM 0001828 Right Angle E->N S->N P 2 Sat 2/26/2000 03:11 PM 0002714 Sideswipe S->N S->N 1 2 Wed-3/15/2000 01:53 PM 0003629 Approach Turn E->S W->E 1 2 Tue-4/4/2000 12:25 PM 0004643 Rear End N->S N->S P 2 1 Tue-4/11/2000 07:05 AM 0004983 Right Angle N->S E->N 1 2 Fri-4/14/2000 04:46 PM 0005185 Backing N->S B P 2 Tue-4/25/2000 02:35 PM 0005712 Rear End N->S N->S P 2 Thu-5/11/2000 06:11 PM 0006575 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Fri-5/19/2000 10:38 AM 0006977 Right Angle S->W W->E P 2 The-618/2000 01:55 PM 0007963 Sideswipe N->E N->E P 2 Mon-6/12/2000 12:40 PM 0008172 Backing E->W P 3 Tue-6/20/2000 04:16 PM 0008580 Sideswipe S->N S P 2 Mon-6/26/2000 02:06 PM 0008913 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Sat-7/15/2000 09:07 AM 0009877 Sideswipe N->S N->S P 2 Fri-7/2112000 02:40 PM 0010125 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Mon.-8/7/2000 12:30 PM 0011054 Sideswipe W->N W->E 2 2 Mon-8/28/2000 03:39 PM 0012123 Backing N->S B 1 2 Tue-9/19/2000 04:45 AM 0013160 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle S->S 1 1 -� Thu-11/9/2000 06:56 PM 0015679 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle N->S Prk P 4 Mon-12/412000 06:10 AM 0016880 Right Angle E->N N->S 1 1 Yearly Totals: Number of 22 Totals: 0 8 15 0 46 Collisions: ,(ear.- 2001 { Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot 1 Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Fri-1/19/2001 12:11 PM 1101911 Sideswipe S->N S->N P H 2 Tue-2/13/2001 09:05 AM 0102164 Backing Bck W->E P 2 Fri-2/23/2001 10:28 AM 0102662 Rear End N->S N->S P 3 Wed-3/7/2001 06:52 PM 0103294 Approach Turn N->E S->N P 2 Wed-3/21/2001 10:53 AM 0104021 Rear End S->N Prk 2 2 Mon-5/21/2001 09:40 PM 0107239 Rear End E->W E->W 2 2 Fri-6/29/2001 03:46 PM 0109280 Right Angle N->E E->W P 2 Wed-7/25/2001 04:45 PM 0110529 Backing N->S 1 3 Wed-8/29/2001 03:24 PM 0112123 Approach Turn E->W W->N P 2 Wed-8/29/2001 06:26 PM 0112135 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle S->N Prk P 2 _ Wed-9/26/2001 02:22 PM 0113376 Backing S->N B 1 2 Wed-9/26/2001 02:52 PM 0113375 Sideswipe N->S N->S 1 2 Wed-9/26/2001 04:00 PM 0113381 Rear End N->S N->S P 2 Wed-9/26/2001 11:06 AM 0113362 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 3 Fri-10/12/2001 04:18 PM 0114075 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle N->S Prk 1 3 Mon-10/22/2001 01:04 PM 0114494 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle S->N Prk 1 2 1 Wed-10/31/2001 08:43 AM 0114922 Approach Turn W->N E->W 2 2 Fri-11/2/2001 02:54 AM 0115014 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle W->E P H 1 Thu-12/6/2001 07:40 PM 0116782 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Totals: Number of 19 Totals: 0 11 11 2 41 IYearly ._.Collisions: -'ear: 2002 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh 1 Mon-1/21/2002 06:20 PM 0201085 Rear End N->S N->S P 3 Tue-2/12/2002 02:37 PM 0203442 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Wed-2/20/2002 12:04 PM 0202549 Sideswipe N->S N->S P 2 _J Page 1 A Tue-2/26/2002 02:46 PM 0202841 Right Angle Fri-3/8/2002 05:46 PM 0203288 Right Angle Fri-3/22/2002 12:27 PM 0203938 Right Angle ^� Tue-4/9/2002 06:55 AM 0204836 Approach Turn Wed-5/22/2002 08:54 PM 0207088 Right Angle Mon-5/27/2002 09:07 PM 0207337 Approach Turn Tue-5/28/2002 04:38 PM 0207389 Rear End �j Wed-6/12/2002 07:57 AM 0208063 Rear End Fri-6/14/2002 05:19 PM 0208194 Rear End `I Tue-7/9/2002 11:15 AM 029435 Approach Turn Thu-10/3/2002 03:52 PM 0213642 Head On Sun-10/6/2002 09:35 AM 0213789 Rear End Sat-11/9/2002 0 1: 17 PM 02015435 Rear End Sun-11/10/2002 03:08 PM 0215482 Rear End Mon-11/18/2002 03:25 PM 0215875 Rear End Wed-11/20/2002 02:20 PM 0216002 Sideswipe Wed-12/4/2002 01:24 PM 0216627 Right Angle Fri-12/27/2002 02:44 PM 0217740 Rear End Jeariy Totals: Number of 21 ollisious: _ Link Totals: Number of 62 collisions: Totals for 'orridor• lumber of Collisions: 97 Total Vehicles Involved: 195 umber of Fatalities: 14 (14.43%) umber of Injuries: 33/49 (34.02%) umber of PDOs: 64 (65.98%) Page 1 N->E E->W P H 2 S->W W->E P 2 N->W E->W P 2 W->N E->W P 2 N->S W->E P 2 W->N E->W 1 2 S->N S->N 1 2 E->W E->W P 2 W->E W->E P 2 W->N E->W 1 2 W->E E->W P 3 N->S Prk 1 2 S->N S->N P 2 N->S B 2 W->E P 4 E->W E->W 1 1 2 W->S N->S P 2 W->E W->E P 3 Totals: 2 4 15 1 47 Totals: 2 23 41 3 134 City of Federal Way Location Report 2/7/2005 eport Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 ocation: 1 AV S at S 336 ST Year 2000 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Tue-1/11/2000 03:38 PM 0000496 Sideswipe S->N S->N 0 P 2 =dumber of Collisions: 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 JI Year 2001 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Mon-1/8/2001 04:46 PM 00376 Rear End N->S N->S 0 P 2 Thu-6/28/2001 09:29 AM 0109217 Rear End E->N Prk 0 1 2 Number of Collisions: 2 Totals: 0 1 1 0 4 Year 2002 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Tue-6/18/2002 04:44 PM 0208393 Rear End N->S N->S 0 P 2 Fri-8/23/2002 04:36 PM 0211641 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle S->N 0 P 1 Tue-12/10/2002 04:50 PM 0216943 Approach Turn S->N N->W 0 P 2 —lumber of Collisions: 3 Totals: 0 0 3 0 5 ;rand Totals: .lumber of Collisions: 6 Number of Vehicles Involved: 11 umber of Fatalities: 0 (0.00%) umber of Injuries: 1/1 (16.67%) umber of PDOs: 5 (83.33%) Collision Rate: 0.00 Pagel City of Federal Way Location Report 2/7/2005 _Report Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 ,Location: S 348 ST at SR 161 Year 2000 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sun-1/30/2000 06:00 PM 0001406 Sideswipe E->N E->N 0 P 2 Mon-2/7/2000 11:25 AM 0001765 Right Angle E->N S->N 0 P 2 i Sat-2/12/2000 12:00 PM 0002029 Backing S->E B 0 P 2 Tue-7/4/2000 11:25 AM 0009335 Right Angle W->S N->S 0 P 2 lI Sat-7/8/2000 01:17 PM 0009546 Rear End N->S N->S 0 1 4 Wed-8/2/2000 08:45 PM 0010520 Sideswipe N->S N->S 0 P 2 Mon-9/25/2000 01:11 PM 0013489 Sideswipe N->W N->S 0 P 2 Thu-11/9/2000 09:00 AM 0015655 Rear End W->E W->E 0 P 2 ',umber of Collisions: 8 Totals: 0 1 7 0 18 Year 2001 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot j Date J Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sun-2/18/2001 12:10 PM 0102392 Sideswipe S->N S->N 0 P 2 Wed-2/21/2001 04:10 PM 0102571 Sideswipe E->W E->W 0 P 2 I Tue-6/19/2001 12:33 PM 0108702 Rear End W->E W->E 0 P H 3 ' Fri-7/6/2001 11:00 PM 0019662 Approach Turn N->S S->W 0 P 2 Sat-7/21/2001 03:02 PM 0110331 Sideswipe S->E S->N 0 P 2 Sun-7/29/2001 02:00 PM 0110702 Sideswipe S->E S->N 0 P 2 Wed-8/1/2001 02:29 PM 0110833 Sideswipe W->N W->E 0 P 2 Tue-11/13/2001 03:45 AM 0115629 Rear End S->N S->N 0 P H 2 )umber of Collisions: 8 Totals: 0 0 8 2 17 Year 2002 Collision Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Date Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sun-2/17/2002 06:13 PM 0208341 Head On N->S S->N 0 1 4 Sat-4/13/2002 12:22 PM 0205043 Rear End W->E 0 P 3 Mon-5/13/2002 07:39 AM 0206590 Rear End S->N S->N 0 P 2 Sun-6/9/2002 01:50 PM 0208146 Rear End N->S N->S 0 P H 2 Fri-6/21/2002 03:49 PM 0208568 Approach Turn E->S W->E 0 P 2 J Tue-7/9/2002 11:54 AM 029136 Approach Turn E->S W->E 0 P 2 Wed-7/10/2002 11:21 AM 029487 Sideswipe E->S E->S 0 P 2 Mon-7/22/2002 10:20 AM 0210094 Approach Turn E->S W->E 0 P 2 Pagel Thu-8/8/2002 04:29 PM 0210957 Sideswipe E->N E->W 0 1 3 Mon-8/19/2002 03:31 PM 0211447 Rear End S->E 0 P 3 Wed-8/28/2002 01:48 PM 0211855 Sideswipe W->E W->N 0 P 2 Thu-9/5/2002 11:09 AM 0212217 Right Angle W->E S->N 0 P 2 Sun-9/8/2002 04:10 AM 0212361 Right Angle W->E N->S 0 P H 2 Fri-10/4/2002 03:44 PM 0213692 Rear End W->E W->E 0 2 2 Fri-10/4/2002 06:48 AM 0213669 Rear End S->E B 0 P 2 Mon-10/14/2002 04:20 PM 0214191 Sideswipe N->S N->S 0 P 2 Tue-10/15/2002 08:01 PM 0214252 Sideswipe W->S E->S 0 2 3 Mon-11/4/2002 12:22 PM 0215199 Approach Turn W->N E->W 0 P 2 Wed-11/27/2002 02:27 PM 0216350 Rear End S->N 0 P 3 Fri-12/6/2002 07:43 AM 0216725 Rear End S->E B 0 P 2 Fri-12/13/2002 10:24 AM 0217084 Approach Turn E->S W->E 0 P 2 Sun-12/15/2002 01:26 AM 02017177 Right Angle W->E S->W 0 P 3 Tue-12/17/2002 03:23 PM 0217311 Rear End S->E B 0 P 2 Sat-12/28/2002 01:59 PM 0217778 Rear End N->S N->S 0 1 2 Sat-12/28/2002 11:27 PM 0217799 Approach Turn W->E E->S 0 P 2 Mon-12/30/2002 12:01 PM 0217861 Approach Turn E->S W->E 0 P 2 Mon-12/30/2002 12:17 PM 0217862 Right Angle W->E S->N 0 P 3 Number of Collisions: 27 Totals: 0 7 22 2 63 errand Totals: Aumber of Collisions: 43 Number of Vehicles Involved: 98 umber of Fatalities: 0 (0.00%) umber of Injuries: 6/8 (13.95%) Number of PDOs: 37 (86.05%) �ollision Rate: 0.00 Pagel City of Federal Way Corridor Report 2/7/2005 Report Period: 01/01/2000 to 12/31/2002 orridor. SR 99 between 16 AV S and S 336 ST 16 AV S at SR 99 ear: 2000 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Tue-1/18/2000 07:50 AM 0000819 Other Mon-3/13/2000 08:47 PM 0003544 Rear End Thu-5/11/2000 11:25 AM 0006553 Sideswipe Tue-6/6/2000 05:13 PM 0007876 Sideswipe Wed-10/11/2000 08:00 AM 0014234 Rear End Yearly 'Totals: Number of 5 ;Collisions: ear: 2001 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Sat-1/6/2001 09:32 PM 010293 Rear End Tue-1/16/2001 07:53 PM 0100809 Rear End Wed-5/30/2001 04:35 PM 0108694 Rear End Wed-9/19/2001 10:48 AM 0113072 Sideswipe Mon-12/10/2001 04:50 PM 0116970 Sideswipe Yearly Totals: Number of 5 jollisions: Year: 2002 Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Mon-1/21/2002 02:06 PM 0201070 Rear End Fri-3/15/2002 06:24 PM 0203601 Rear End Thu-3/28/2002 03:53 PM 0204246 Rear End Tue-6/4/2002 09:15 AM 027752 Rear End Fri-7/12/2002 11:29 AM 029597 Rear End Mon-8/12/2002 05:00 PM 0211094 Right Angle Thu-10/3/2002 02:50 PM 0213638 Sideswipe Sun-11/3/2002 11:10 AM 0215161 Rear End Page 1 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->N N P 3 N->S N->S P 2 S->N S->N P 2 S->E S->N P 2 S->N S->N P 2 Totals: 0 0 5 0 11 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh I Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->N S->E P 2 S->N S->N P H 2 S->N P 3 S->N S->N 2 2 S->E S->E P 2 Totals: 0 2 4 1 11 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->N S->N 1 3 S->N S->N P 2 S->N S->N P 2 S->N S->N P 2 S->N B P 2 W->E S->N P H 2 N->E N->E P 2 S->N S->N P 2 Tue-11112/2002 03:32 PM 0215569 Sideswipe N->W N->S P 3 Yearly Totals: Number of 9 Totals: 0 1 8 1 20 Collisions: Link Totals: Number of 19 Totals: 0 3 17 2 42 Collisions: aR 99 900 ft. S of S 336 ST Year: 2001 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Wed-11/7/2001 03:11 PM 0115307 Backing S->N P early Totals: Number of 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 Collisions: 1Link Totals: Number of 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 Collisions: 5R 99 660 ft. S of S 336 ST Year: 2001 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sun-711/2001 09:40 AM 0019362 Rear End S->N S->N Totals: 0 0 P 1 0 early Totals: Number of 1 Collisions: ]Link Totals: Number of 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 Collisions: 3 336 ST at SR 99 Year: 2000 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Mon-1/17/2000 04:07 PM 0000794 Rear End S->N S->N P 3 Mon-1/24/2000 12:14 PM 0000144 Approach Turn E->S W->E P 2 Tue-2/8/2000 02:58 PM 0001828 Right Angle E->N S->N P 2 Sat-2/26/2000 03:11 PM 0002714 Sideswipe S->N S->N 1 2 Wed-3/15/2000 01:53 PM 0003629 Approach Turn E->S W->E 1 2 Tue-4/4/2000 12:25 PM 0004643 Rear End N->S N->S P 2 Tue-4/11/2000 07:05 AM 0004983 Right Angle N->S E->N 1 2 Fri-4/14/2000 04:46 PM 0005185 Backing N->S B P 2 Tue-4/25/2000 02:35 PM 0005712 Rear End N->S N->S P 2 Thu-5/11/2000 06:11 PM 0006575 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Fri-5/19/2000 10:38 AM 0006977 Right Angle S->W W->E P 2 Thu-6/8/2000 01:55 PM 0007963 Sideswipe N->E N->E P 2 F Mon-6/12/2000 12:40 PM 0008172 Backing E->W P 3 Tue-6/20/2000 04:16 PM 0008580 Sideswipe S->N S P 2 JMon-6/26/2000 02:06 PM 0008913 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Page 1 �1 Sat-7/15/2000 09:07 AM Fri-7/21/2000 02:40 PM Mon-8/7/2000 12:30 PM Man-8/28/2000 03:39 PM Tue-9/19/2000 04:45 AM Thu-11/9/2000 06:56 PM Mon-12/4/2000 06:10 AM —yearly Totals: Number of Collisions: Vear: 2001 Date Time Of Collision Collision Fri-1/19/2001 02:35 PM Tue-2/13/2001 09:05 AM _ Fri-2/23/2001 10:28 AM Wed-3/7/2001 06:52 PM 1 J Wed-3/21/2001 10:53 AM Mon-5/21/2001 09:40 PM - Fri-6/29/2001 03:46 PM Wed-7/25/2001 04:45 PM Wed-8/29/2001 03:24 PM Wed-8/29/2001 06:26 PM Wed-9/26/2001 02:22 PM Wed-9/26/2001 02:52 PM Wed-9/26/2001 04:00 PM Wed-9/26/2001 11:06 AM Fri-10/12/2001 04:18 PM Mon-10/22/2001 01:04 PM Wed-10/31/2001 08:43 AM Fri-111=001 02:54 AM Thu-1216/2001 07:40 PM early Totals: Number of Collisions: ear: 2002 0009877 Sideswipe 0010125 Approach Turn 0011054 Sideswipe 0012123 Backing 0013160 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 0015679 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 0016880 Right Angle 22 Case Number Type of Collision 0100958 Sideswipe 0102164 Backing 0102662 Rear End 0103294 Approach Turn 0104021 Rear End 0107239 Rear End 0109280 Right Angle 0110529 Backing 0112123 Approach Turn 0112135 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 0113376 Backing 0113375 Sideswipe 0113381 Rear End 0113362 Approach Turn 0114075 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 0114494 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 0114922 Approach Turn 0115014 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 0116782 Approach Turn 19 N->S N->S W->N E->W W->N W->E 2 N->S B 1 S->S 1 N->S Prk E->N N->S 1 Totals: 0 8 P 2 P 2 2 2 1 P 4 1 15 0 46 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S->N Bck N->S N->E S->N E->W N->E N->S E->W S->N S->N N->S N->S W->N N->S S->N W->N W->E W->N S->N W->E N->S S->N Prk E->W E->W W->N Prk B N->S N->S E->W Prk Prk E->W E->W Totals: P H P P P 2 2 P 1 P P i l P P 1 1 2 P P 0 11 11 III 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 41 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Mon-1/21/2002 06:20 PM 0201085 Rear End N->S N->S P 3 Tue-2/12/2002 02:37 PM 0203442 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Wed-2/20/2002 12:04 PM 0202549 Sideswipe N->S N->S P 2 Tue-2/26/2002 02:46 PM 0202841 Right Angle N->E E->W P H 2 Fri-3/8/2002 05:46 PM 0203288 Right Angle S->W W->E P 2 Fri-3/22/2002 12:27 PM 0203938 Right Angle N->W E->W P 2 Tue-4/9/2002 06:55 AM 0204836 Approach Turn W->N E->W P 2 Wed-5/22/2002 08:54 PM 0207088 Right Angle N->S W->E P 2 Mon-5/27/2002 09:07 PM 0207337 Approach Turn W->N E->W 1 2 Tue-5/28/2002 04:38 PM 0207389 Rear End S->N S->N 1 2 Wed-6/12/2002 07:57 AM 0208063 Rear End E->W E->W P 2 Fri-6/14/2002 05:19 PM 0208194 Rear End W->E W->E P 2 Tue-7/9/2002 11:15 AM 029435 Approach Turn W->N E->W 1 2 Thu-10/3/2002 03:52 PM 0213642 Head On W->E E->W P 3 Sun-10/6/2002 09:35 AM 0213789 Rear End N->S Prk 1 2 Sat-11/9/2002 01:17 PM 02015435 Rear End S->N S->N P 2 Page 1 Sun-11/10/2002 03:08 PM 0215482 Rear End Mon-11/18/2002 03:25 PM 0215875 Rear End Wed-11/20/2002 02:20 PM 0216002 Sideswipe Wed-12/4/2002 01:24 PM 0216627 Right Angle Fri-12/27/2002 02:44 PM 0217740 Rear End Yearly Totals: Number of 21 Collisions: Link Totals: Number of 62 Collisions: totals for Corridor• Number of Collisions: 83 Cotal Vehicles Involved: 176 Number of Fatalities: 2 (2.41%) Number of Injuries: 23/26 (27.71%) Number of PDOs: 60 (72.29%) Page 1 N->S B 2 W->E P 4 E->W E->W 1 1 2 W->S N->S P 2 W->E W->E P 3 Totals: 2 4 15 1 47 Totals: 2 23 41 3 134 KEY: Below curve, storage not needed for capacity. Above curve, further analysis recommended. 40 MpH �21 � 510 ti 177-777 60 MpH t2l -. — _- �� 4 25 20 15 10 5 Q % Total DHV Turning Left (single turning movement) (1) DHV is total volume from both directions. (2) Speeds are posted speeds. Left -Turn Storage Guidelines (Two -Lane. Unsignalized] Figure 910 Ra 1200 1100 �f 1000 �+ U 900 800 R x m 0 0 ~ 700 u 2 600 z w u � v 1- o 500 a un cu LU N Z < 400 lb o L Q J F- 1- w � 300 Intersections At Grade Design Manual Page 910-18, English Version May 2001