Loading...
05-100131CITY OF �. Federal August 26, 2005 Mr. Toby Caenen Dowl Engineers 8320 154h Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 y Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal wa y. com Re: File #05-100131-000-00-UP; PROCESS III APPROVAL St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements, 34515 9`h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Caenen: Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article VI, "Process III Review Project Approval," the City of Federal Way has completed the administrative review and hereby issues conditional approval of the proposal to construct 60 new parking stalls along the north and west portions of an internal roadway, and construction of a 375 stall parking lot with new storm drainage facilities at the above referenced site. The site plan application submitted on January 11, 2005, and revisions submitted on January 14, May 12, May 26, June 24 and August 16, 2005, are hereby conditionally approved per the enclosed Findings for Project Approval. The remainder of this letter outlines future review processes required, gives a brief summary of the process under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) to date, and outlines procedures relating to appeals and approval periods for this decision. Additional requirements will be provided as City departments review the civil plans for the parking lot improvements. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Prior to issuance of the Authorization to Proceed letter, the applicant shall submit for review and approval revised landscape plans that eliminate landscaping from the pond access road, and maintains access to the water quality facility and pond outlet pipes. 2. Prior to final inspections of the parking lot improvements, the Binding Site Plan Amendment must be recorded at King County at the expense of the applicant. SEPA PROCESS The responsible official of the City of Federal Way issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on July 27, 2005, pursuant to SEPA (file #05-101132-00-SE). Two comments were received; the appeal period for the determination was completed on August 24, 2005, with no corrections to the City's initial determination. File #05-10013 1 -000-00-UP Doc. I.D. 32972 Mr. Toby Caenen Page 2 August 26, 2005 PROCESS III DECISION AND APPEAL PROCESS Unless modified or appealed, the Process III decision is valid for a period of one year from the date of issuance of the decision. If no further action is taken within one year of the date of issuance, the decision will expire. A single one-year extension of the decision may be granted, only if a written request is submitted to the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`b Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718) at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the decision. This land use decision may be appealed, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-397, by the applicant or any person who received a copy of the decision pursuant to FWCC Section 22-395(e). Any appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Department of Community Development Services (address above), and be accompanied by the established fee, within 14 calendar days after the effective date of issuance of this decision. The effective date of issuance is the date of the decision plus three calendar days, or August 29, 2005. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusion of the Director of Community Development Services disputed by the person filing the appeal. The Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hear any appeals of the Process III decision. The applicant will be required to submit a final landscape plan prior to issuance of Public Works Department Authorization to Proceed with Construction letter. This land use decision does not constitute approval of engineering plans, nor does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Deb Barker, Interim Senior Planner, at 253-835-2642. Sincerely, A 1�� p— Kathy McClung, Director Department of Community Development Services Enc: Findings and Conclusion Approved Site Plan c: Deb Barker, Interim Senior Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Raid Tirhi, Public Works Traffic Engineer Bill Foulkes, Hammes Canzfany, 1325 0 Avenue, Suite 1035, Seattle, WA 98101 Mr. Lyle Whipple, 34608 4 Place South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Brent and April Ost, 34603 4'b Place South, Federal Way, WA 98023 Mr. Milo Kurle, 34604 0 PIace South, Federal Way, WA 98023 File i105-100131-000-00-UP Doe- I.D. 32972 EXHIBIT A Findings and Conclusions for Process III Project Approval St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Federal Way File No: 05-100131-000-00-UP FINDINGS St. Francis Hospital proposes to construct two new parking areas along an internal driveway, construct a new separate parking lot, and install related storm drainage facilities to accommodate the existing hospital population. The proposal consists of construction of up to 60 new parking stalls along the north and western portions of an existing internal roadway, construction of a 375 stall employee parking lot on a vacant site west of the hospital, and the creation of a storm drainage facility on a vacant lot southwest of the hospital. 2. The site is located in an Office Park (OP) zone. Pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-831, hospitals are permitted in this zoning district. As the project is not categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C, Revised Code of Washington, it has been reviewed under Process III, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-831. 3. A Notice of Application was issued on February 12, 2005. Three comment letters were received by the City during the comment period associated with the notice of application. 4. A Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance was issued on July 27, 2005. Two comment letters were received during the comment period. The appeal period for this determination was completed on August 24, 2005, with no appeals filed. The Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, File No. 05-100132-00-SE, is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. 5. Current uses of the project site and surrounding areas include: Project Site: Combination of developed hospital site and vacant land North: US Postal Department Bulk Mail Facility South: Single-family residences, Lakehaven Utility district well, and office uses. East: 9th Avenue South right-of-way West: Single-family residences, vacant land 6. The subject site is obligated under provisions of a Binding Site Plan (BSP, file 05-100133-00-SU). The BSP will be amended to reflect the inclusion of the new 375-stall parking lot. Prior to final inspections associated with the parking lot improvements, the approved BSP amendment shall be recorded at King County at the expense of the applicant. 7. Access to the parking lot improvements will be provided from existing internal driveways that provide access to 9t` Avenue South, as well 6 h Avenue South, a private roadway south of the hospital. Parking stalls formalized at the northern portion of the subject site will be located within St Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements File #05-10013 1 -000-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 32973 Findings and Conclusions for Process III Project Approval Page 1 the eastern portion of Tract Z, a 30-foot wide ingress/egress easement. Based on the recorded St. Francis Hospital BSP and future amendments to the BSP, Tract Z, and future Tract Y to be located at the northern portion of the new 375-stall parking lot, will be dedicated at no cost to the City as right- of-way at such time the Public Works Director deems necessary. Any parking stalls proposed to be located within Tract Z are considered "temporary" and shall not be eligible for any grandfathering or compensation by the City for removal. The applicant will construct a new combined stormwater detention and water quality pond on a vacant lot southeast of the proposed new parking lot to satisfy the requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the 1998 City of Federal Way Addendum to the manual. Consistent with the requirements of adopted regulations, all water runoff from the new parking lot will be treated by the water quality pond, followed by a Leaf Compost Filter system located adjacent to the pond, before being discharged into the storm conveyance system, which ultimately enters the public right-of-way. The western portion of the storm drainage facility shall be screened from adjacent residential uses with Type I landscaping. The other parking lot areas will be treated for water quality with a Leaf Compost Filter system, prior to discharging into the existing storm drainage systems that drain into Lake #6. 9. A total of 304 of the 361 trees that meet the FWCC definition of a significant tree will be removed in conjunction with construction of the new parking lot. Generally, the significant trees located in the perimeter of the new parking lot will be retained to the extent that they are not impacted by proposed grading activities. The.applicant proposes to retain 57 of the significant trees and provide 34 replacement trees in conformance with FWCC Section 22-1568, "Significant Trees." Ten -foot tall Austrian Pine and Western Red Cedar trees are proposed along the north and south portions of the parking lot to serve as replacement trees. Twenty-six of the replacement trees will be planted at the south of the parking lot in a Type I landscape area, with the balance of the replacement trees planted at the north end of the project site. A proposed 40-foot wide area between the south property line and the southern curb of the parking lot is proposed to largely remain undisturbed, including retention of significant trees and understory vegetation. Minor grading within the area is proposed to establish parking lot grades, and several tree wells are proposed around significant trees to protect the trees from the grading activity. The disturbed areas will be revegetated with Type I landscaping, including replacement trees. 10. The proposed development has been designed to provide optimal configuration of parking as it relates to existing drive aisles and future roadways. Proposed parking areas will be internally landscaped consistent with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 22, Article XVII. The applicant has proposed to set the new parking lot back 40 feet from an adjacent residential zone, and will provide 15 feet of Type I landscaping adjacent to the parking lot to reduce the visual impact of the parking lot on the residential zone as required pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1567(e)(2). In addition, 15 feet of Type I landscaping shall be provided on the west side of the new storm drainage pond to screen the residential dwellings from the storm pond in conformance with the FWCC. Preliminary landscape plans depict landscaping around the new storm pond. Prior to the issuance of the Authorization to Proceed with Construction letter, the landscape plan shall be revised to eliminate landscaping from the pond access roadway and to maintain access to the water quality facility and pond outlet pipes. The project will be landscaped in accordance with City requirements. The proposed landscaping contains greater than 25 percent drought resistant plants, consistent with FWCC Section 22-1564(f). All new landscape islands within parking areas are comprised of drought tolerant trees, shrubs, and St Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements File #05-10013 1 -000-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 32973 Findings and Conclusions for Process III Project Approval Page 2 groundcover. A final landscape plan reflecting the tree replacement requirements shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of the Public Works Department Authorization to Proceed with Construction. A final landscape inspection will be required before the new parking lot facilities can be utilized. 11. The proposed elevation of the new parking lot is above the ground floor of the adjacent residential structures. Comment letters submitted in response to the notice of application advise that automobile headlight glare may be evident to adjacent residents. FWCC Section 22-954(c) requires that the applicant select, place, and direct light sources both directable and nondirectable, so that glare produced by any light source, to the maximum extent possible, does not extend to adjacent properties or to the right-of-way. The applicant has proposed to retain a 40-foot wide area of native vegetation at the southern end of the parking lot site, consisting of 25 feet of retained vegetation and 15 feet of retained and supplemental vegetation; install a solid fence at the southern end of the new parking lot; and install of solid fencing west of the new storm drainage to screen the adjacent residential properties from potential parking lot light pollution and provide an additional measure of privacy. The applicant has further proposed to install shielded or cut-off type lighting fixtures, lower wattage light fixtures, and shorter light poles for the new parking lot, and to retain a lighting engineer to design lighting to minimize light impacts to neighbors. The design of the lighting will be reviewed in conjunction with construction permits to verify that code requirements are met. 12. The proposal is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), all applicable provisions of FWCC Chapter 22, and the public health, safety, and welfare. Streets in the areas of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal as described, and access to the subject property via 9 h Avenue South and 6'h Avenue South are at the optimal location. 13. The overall proposal embodies good site design principles consistent with the City's Community Design Guidelines. The applicant will provide six-foot wide pedestrian pathways from the new parking lot to hospital entries, and existing pedestrian corridors will serve the new parking stalls on the north side and west side of the drive aisle. The applicant has proposed to delineate new pedestrian pathways with poured concrete that is textured or stamped. Paint striping as a method of delineation will not be permitted for any of the parking lots. 14. This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. CONCLUSION The proposal has been reviewed for compliance with the FWCC and FWCP, and other applicable City codes, plans, policies, and regulations. The proposal has been found to meet the decisional criteria of FWCC Chapter 22, Article VI, "Process III, Project Approval." This decision shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, or standards relating to this decision. Prepared by: Deb Barker, Interim Senior Planner Date: August 26, 2005 St Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements File #05-100131-000-00-UP / Doc. I.D. 32973 Findings and Conclusions for Process III Project Approval Page 3 CITY OF �. Federal Way June 7, 2005 Toby Coenen Dowl Engineers 8320 154"' Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 1FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal wa y. com RE: File #05-100131-000-00-UP; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Dear Mr. Coenen: The Planning Department has continued review of revisions received on May 12, 2005, for the proposed parking lot expansion at St. Francis Hospital. SEPA comments were forwarded in a June 3, 2005 letter. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED: In order to further review the applications, additional information is requested as follows. With this request for additional information, the 120-day time line remains stopped with 10 of the 120 days used.' Site Plan — Prior to issuance of the land use decision, the following items must be addressed: • Based on a May 2, 2005 meeting, it is anticipated that the alignment of the north/south pedestrian walkway in phases 2 and 3 may be revised. Pedestrian walkways shall be separated from the main drive aisle by landscaping. • If the pedestrian pathway is maintained at the head of the eastern rows of parking, the sidewalk can be narrowed to four feet in width, with the addition of curb stops to prevent vehicle overhang. ■ The proposed new storm drainage pond must be depicted on page C 1. Landscape Plan — Prior to issuance of the land use decision, the issue of significant tree retention, and replacement shall be resolved as discussed below. As previously discussed, prior to issuance of construction permits, landscape specifics for perimeter and interior lot landscape areas shall be addressed to the satisfaction of the FWCC. • It appears that proposed grading activities on the north and west portions of the site impact significant trees proposed for retention. Please refer to the red lined landscape and clearing and grading plans, and revise tree retention quantities as appropriate. ■ It appears that installation of proposed storm drainage lines on the south side of the site may impact significant trees proposed for retention. Please refer to the red lined landscape and clearing and grading plans, and revise tree retention quantities as appropriate. ■ There are eight significant trees proposed for retention on the west side of the site that appear to be located off site. As such, these trees would not qualify for project related tree retention. See the red lined landscape plan. Review clock stopped on February 10, 2005, with City request for additional information. Clock would have restarted 14 days after the May 12, 2005 resubmittal, if all required information was received. Mr. Coenen June 7, 2005 Page 2 • The resubmitted plans depict a new storm drainage feature to be located on an undeveloped portion of the subject site. This facility will be subject to FWCC landscape provisions including 15 feet of Type I landscaping along the west property line adjacent to the residential zone, and significant tree retention and/or replacement. Revise the significant tree data and the landscape plan to address code requirements. • As previously noted, perimeter landscaping cannot be used in meeting required interior parking lot landscape areas. Revise the interior parking lot landscape quantities to eliminate perimeter areas. • Enlarge the font on the landscape plan as it is too small to read. • Due to the scale of the landscape plan, there is little difference in some shrub symbols. Revise the symbols or enlarge the landscape plan scale for clarity. • The landscape plan identifies 378 significant trees on the subject site and notes that more than 75 percent of these trees will be removed with project development. In lieu of tree replacement, the plan proposes that a number of trees be upsized to two-inch caliper or eight feet in height. However, under the FWCC Section 22-1568, when more than 75 percent of significant trees are removed from the site, replacement trees and remaining trees shall equal 25 percent of the original number of significant trees. In addition, sizes for replacement trees are ten foot tall for evergreen trees and three-inch caliper for deciduous trees 2 The size of the upsized trees does not meet replacement tree specifications, and the proposal to upsize trees does not meet the intent of replacement trees. The landscape plan must identify specific trees planted as replacement trees in conformance with FWCC. The applicant can elect to upsize non -replacement trees, but is not required to do so. • Identify the landscaping for the area east of the phase III parking lot. Will this be hydroseeded or will it remain undisturbed? Will any invasive species such as blackberries or scoffs broom be removed? The areas immediately adjacent to new rockeries shall be replanted. • Prior to issuance of construction permits, the landscape plan shall be revised to reflect the following FWCC code standards: o Shrubs located in perimeter planting areas shall be a minimum of 24 inches in height at the time of planting. o Deciduous trees shall be a minimum of 1.5 feet above the rootball measured 4.5 feet above the ground at the time of planting. o Evergreen trees shall be a minimum of six feet in height at the time of planting. o All landscape islands shall contain ground cover to achieve full coverage within three years. Timeline - With this request for additional information, the 120-day time line remains stopped with 10 of the 120 days used.' The 120-day time line will recommence 14 days after the City receives requested information from this letter. Be advised that review comments from the Planning Department will be available in approximately three weeks. When submitting requested information, five copies of revised SEPA checklist and/or required plans, and four copies of any revised reports shall be provided in addition to the enclosed resubmittal form. Project Cancellation - Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the 2 FWCC Section 22-1568(5)(b) 3 Review clock stopped on February 10, 2005, with City request for additional information. Clock would have restarted 14 days after the May 12, 2005 resubmittal, if all required information was received. However, as noted in the June 3, 2005 letter, not all information was correct and additional information was requested. 05-100131 Doc. I.D. 31924 Mr. Coenen June 7, 2005 Page 3 application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to call me at 253-835-2642. Sincerely, kA &Jt� Deb Barker Associate PIanner enc: Resubmittal Information Form c: Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company, 1325 0 Avenue, Suite 1035, Seattle, WA 98101 Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer 05-100131 Doc I.D. 31924 FILE CITY OF ti. Federal Way June 3, 2005 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 wwww cityoffederalway. com Toby Coenen via fax 425-869-2679 Dowl Engineers 8320 154"' Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 RE: File #05-100131-000-00-UP; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Dear Mr. Coenen: The Planning Department has reviewed the revisions received on May 12, 2005, for the proposed parking lot expansion at St. Francis Hospital. The applications were determined to be complete on January 31, 2005, and are being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article VI, "Process III Review - Project Approval," in addition to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). An amendment to the Binding Site Plan is also proposed. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED: In order to further review the applications, additional information is requested as follows. With this request for additional information, the 120-day time line remains stopped with 10 of the 120 days used! SEPA Checklist - Please revise the SEPA checklist to address the following comments. The City will issue an environmental determination if the environmental checklist is satisfactorily revised to address all items identified below: General The revised SEPA checklist, dated May 10, 2005, does not address the proposed storm drainage facility depicted on the site plan. Please revise the checklist as appropriate to address this discrepancy, including but not limited to checklist sections A.6, A.11, B.3.C, and 13.4. 13.3.c Delete reference to the vault. B.1 Ld The last sentence in this response is not finished. List any additional measures to mitigate light and glare impacts on adjacent residential uses. B.14.c The parking stalls numbers do not correspond to A.6. Please provide consistent parking stall count data. B.16.b List the size of all water and sewer pipes installed with this project. Please be advised that additional comments about the site plan and landscape plans will be available next week. 1 Review clock stopped on February 10, 2005, with City request for additional information. Clock would have restarted 14 days after the May 12, 2005 resubmittal, if all required information was received. Mr. Coenen June 3, 2005 Page 2 Timeline - With this request for additional information, the 120-day time line remains stopped with 10 of the 120 days used .2 The 120-day time line will recommence 14 days after the City receives requested information from this letter. Be advised that review comments from the Planning Department will be available in approximately three weeks. When submitting requested information, five copies of revised SEPA checklist and/or required plans, and four copies of any revised reports shall be provided in addition to the enclosed resubmittal form. Project Cancellation - Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to call me at 253-835-2642. Sincerely, Deb Barker Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Information Form c: Bill Foulkes Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer 2 Review clock stopped on February 10, 2005, with City request for additional information- Clock would have restarted 14 days after the May 12, 2005 resubmittal, if all required information was received. 05-100131 Doc I D 31919 CITY OF L Federal Way CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Mr. Toby Coenen May 20, 2005 Dowl Engineering 8320 154t' Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 RE: File #05-100131-000-00-UP; 05-100132-SE, 05-100133-SU; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Additions, 34515 9`h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Coenen: The Public Works Department has reviewed the revisions received on May 12, 2005, for the proposed parking lot expansion at St. Francis Hospital. The applications were determined to be complete on January 31, 2005, and are being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article VI, "Process III Review - Project Approval," in addition to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). An amendment to the Binding Site Plan is also proposed. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED: In order to further review the applications, additional information is requested as follows: Public Works Engineering — Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734 Engineering comments dated May 19, 2005, are enclosed. Timeline - With this request for additional information, the 120-day time line remains stopped with ten of the 120 days used.I The 120-day time line will recommence 14 days after the City receives requested information from this letter. Be advised that review comments from the Planning Department will be available in approximately three weeks. When submitting requested information, five copies of revised SEPA checklist and/or required plans, and four copies of any revised reports shall be provided in addition to the enclosed Resubmittal form. Project Cancellation - Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to call me at 253-835-2642. Sincerely, Deb Barker Associate Planner enc: Public Works Engineering Comments, May 19, 2005 c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Resubmittal Form 1 Review clock stopped on February 10, 2005, with City request for additional information. Clock would have restarted 14 days after the May 12, 2005 resubmittal, if all required information was received. 05-100131 Doc- I.D. 31766 DOWL E N G I N E 6 R S A division of BOWL. LLC 8320 154th Avenue NE, Redmond, WA 98052 Tele: (425) 869-2670 • FAX: (425) 869-2679 St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Master Land Use Permit Federal Way, Washington Master Land Use Permit Process III (Project Approval) & Binding Site Plan Drainage Narrative GENERAL This narrative discusses the design changes included with the plans resubmitted following the Federal Way staff review that Deb Barker summarized in her February 10, 2005 letter. That letter indicated an open pond is required for stormwater flow control and water quality enhancement measures. This narrative is intended as a companion document to the preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) submitted with the initial MLUP application. CORE REQUIREMENT 3 — FLOW CONTROL Flow Control (detention) is required for Area 3, the 4.5-acre parcel west of the existing hospital. The proposed detention pond will be constructed on the vacant lot (Tax Parcel 750451-0100) that is south of the Ambulatory Services Building, west of Lakehaven's well site, and east of the residential neighborhood adjacent to the proposed parking. Plan Sheet C7 shows the pond in plan view, and sheet C6 shows two cross sectional views. The pond design and configuration conforms to King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Section 5.3.1. The attached calculations indicate approximately 40,000 cubic feet of storage is required. CORE REQUIREMENT 8 — WATER QUALITY The water quality strategy remains the same for Areas 1 and 2 (StormFilter composting filters). The approach for Area 3 changed from a StormFilter vault to a wetpond as outlined in KCSWDM Section 6.4.1, The wetpool is incorporated into the detention pond. The attached calculations indicate a 17,073 cubic foot wetpool volume is required. Plan sheets C6 and C7 depict the layout of the pond. RESUBMITTED MAY 1 2 2005 05-10013 A v Drainage Narrative DOWL S 12578 - 1 - May 10, 2005 Detention Facility Design Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Pond Side Slope: 3.00 H:lV Pond Bottom Length: 125.50 ft Pond Bottom Width: 50.20 ft Pond Bottom Area: 6300. sq. ft Top Area at 1 ft. FB: 13187. sq. ft 0.303 acres Effective Storage Depth: 4.50 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 229.50 ft Storage Volume: 40119. cu. Ft RE uired Storage VO�rzme 0.921 ac-ft Riser Head: 4.50 ft Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 1.69 0.165 2 3.50 1.37 0.051 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation Surf Area (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) (sq. ft) 0.00 229.50 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 6300. 0.02 229.52 126. 0.003 0.010 0.00 6321. 0.04 229.54 253. 0.006 0.015 0.00 6342. 0.05 229.55 316. 0.007 0.018 0.00 6353. 0.07 229.57 444. 0.010 0.021 0.00 6374. 0.09 229.59 571. 0.013 0.023 0.00 6395. 0.11 229.61 699. 0.016 0.025 0.00 6417. 0.12 229.62 764. 0.018 0.027 0.00 6427. 0.14 229.64 892. 0.020 0.029 0.00 6449. 0.24 229.74 1543. 0.035 0.038 0.00 6555. 0.34 229.84 2204. 0.051 0.045 0.00 6663. 0.44 229.94 2875. 0.066 0.052 0.00 6771. 0.54 230.04 3558. 0.082 0.057 0.00 6880. 0.64 230.14 4251. 0.098 0.062 0.00 6990. 0.74 230.24 4956. 0.114 0.067 0.00 7100. 0.84 230.34 5671. 0.130 0.071 0.00 7211. 0.94 230.44 6398. 0.147 0.075 0.00 7323. 1.04 230.54 7136. 0.164 0.079 0.00 7436. 1.14 230.64 7885. 0.181 0.083 0.00 7549. 1.24 230.74 8646. 0.198 0.087 0.00 7663. 1.34 230.84 9418. 0.216 0.090 0.00 7778. 1.44 230.94 10201. 0.234 0.093 0.00 7893. 1.54 231.04 10996. 0.252 0.097 0.00 8009. 1.64 231.14 11803. 0.271 0.100 0.00 8126. 1.74 231.24 12622. 0.290 0.103 0.00 8244. 1.84 231.34 13452. 0.309 0.106 0.00 8362. 1.94 231.44 14294. 0.328 0.108 0.00 8481. Drainage Narrative DOWL S12578 -2- May 10, 2005 St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Master Land Use Permit Federal Way, Washington 2.04 231.54 15148. 0.348 0.111 0.00 8601. 2.14 231.64 16014. 0.368 0.114 0.00 8721. 2.24 231.74 16892. 0.388 0.116 0.00 8842. 2.34 231.84 17783. 0.408 0.119 0.00 8964. 2.44 231.94 18685. 0.429 0.122 0.00 9087. 2.54 232.04 19600. 0.450 0.124 0.00 9210. 2.64 232.14 20527. 0.471 0.126 0.00 9334. 2.74 232.24 21467. 0.493 0.129 0.00 9459. 2.84 232.34 22419. 0.515 0.131 0.00 9585. 2.94 232.44 23384. 0.537 0.133 0.00 9711. 3.04 232.54 24361. 0.559 0.136 0.00 9838. 3.14 232.64 25351. 0.582 0.138 0.00 9965. 3.24 232.74 26354. 0.605 0.140 0.00 10094. 3.34 232.84 27370. 0.628 0.142 0.00 10223. 3.44 232.94 28399. 0.652 0.144 0.00 10353. 3.50 233.00 29022. 0.666 0.146 0.00 10431. 3.51 233.01 29127. 0.669 0.146 0.00 10444. 3.53 233.03 29336. 0.673 0.148 0.00 10470. 3.54 233.04 29441. 0.676 0.150 0.00 10483. 3.56 233.06 29651. 0.681 0.153 0.00 10510. 3.57 233.07 29756. 0.683 0.157 0.00 10523. 3.59 233.09 29967. 0.688 0.161 0.00 10549. 3.60 233.10 30072. 0.690 0.164 0.00 10562. 3.61 233.11 30178. 0.693 0.165 0.00 10575. 3.71 233.21 31242. 0.717 0.174 0.00 10707. 3.81 233.31 32319. 0.742 0.181 0.00 10839. 3.91 233.41 33410. 0.767 0.187 0.00 10973. 4.01 233.51 34514. 0.792 0.192 0.00 11107. 4.11 233.61 35631. 0.818 0.198 0.00 11241. 4.21 233.71 36762. 0.844 0.203 0.00 11377. 4.31 233.81 37906. 0.870 0.208 0.00 11513. 4.41 233.91 39065. 0.897 0.212 0.00 11649. 4.50 234.00 40119. 0.921 0.216 0.00 11773. 4.60 234.10 41303. 0.948 0.528 0.00 11911. 4.70 234.20 42501. 0.976 1.100 0.00 12050. 4.80 234.30 43713. 1.004 1.830 0.00 12190. 4.90 234.40 44939. 1.032 2.620 0.00 12330. 5.00 234.50 46179. 1.060 2.910 0.00 12471. 5.10 234.60 47433. 1.089 3.170 0.00 12613. 5.20 234.70 48702. 1.118 3.410 0.00 12756. 5.30 234.80 49984. 1.147 3.630 0.00 12899. 5.40 234.90 51281. 1.177 3.840 0.00 13043. 5.50 235.00 52593. 1.207 4.040 0.00 13187. 5.60 235.10 53919. 1.238 4.220 0.00 13333. 5.70 235.20 55260. 1.269 4.400 0.00 13479. 5.80 235.30 56615. 1.300 4.580 0.00 13626. 5.90 235.40 57985. 1.331 4.740 0.00 13773. 6.00 235.50 59369. 1.363 4.900 0.00 13922. 6.10 235.60 60769. 1.395 5.060 0.00 14071. 6.20 235.70 62184. 1.428 5.210 0.00 14220. 6.30 235.80 63613. 1.460 5.350 0.00 14371. 6.40 235.90 65058. 1.494 5.500 0.00 14522. 6.50 236.00 66517. 1.527 5.640 0.00 14674. Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Calc Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) Drainage Narrative DOWL S 12578 - 3 - May 10, 2005 St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Master Land Use Permit Federal Wav, Washinqton 1 1.86 ******* 1.28 4.73 234.23 42807. 0.983 2 0.94 ******* 0.62 4.62 234.12 41495. 0.953 3 0.96 0.22 0.22 4.50 234.00 40064. 0.920 4 1.01 ******* 0.20 4.18 233.68 36373. 0.835 5 1.12 ******* 0.19 3.95 233.45 33851. 0.777 6 0.60 ******* 0.14 3.16 232,66 25553. 0.587 7 0.81 ******* 0.12 2.28 231.78 17274. 0.397 8 0.91 ******* 0.11 2.09 231.59 15592. 0.358 Drainage Narrative DOWL 512578 - 4 _ May 10, 2005 Water Quality Facility Design Basic Water Quality Volume Quality Volume for Site Vb=Vrxf Vb = Wetpool Volume Vr = Runoff Volume f = Volume Factor Volume Factor, f = 1 3,' Vr_(0.9A;+0.25At9+0.10Att+0.01AJx(R/12) Al = Area of impervious surface = 150,746 SF Ats = Area of till soil covered with grass = 34,941SF Att = Area of till soil covered with forest = 8,850 SF Ats = Area of outwash soil covered with grass or forest = - SF R = Rainfall from mean annual storm 0 finches Vr _ (0.9A; + 0.25At9 + 0.10Att + 0.01A,) x (R/12) = 5,691 CF Vb = Vr x f = 17,O73CF Drainage Narrative DOWL 512578 -5- May 10, 2005 Existing-Parcel-Lot-Closure.txt Parcel name: Existing Parcel North: 5688.7415 Line Course: N 88-46-40 W North: 5717.7829 Line Course: S 01-12-52 w North: 5058.4439 Line Course: S 88-45-46 E North: 5057.7561 Line Course: S 01-13-51 w North: 4773.3281 Line Course: S 88-44-53 E North: 4770.6322 Line Course: N 01-14-20 E North: 4955.1158 Line Course: S 88-45-46 E North: 4950.7238 Line Course: S 01-14-49 w North: 4938.3929 Line Course: S 88-26-19 E North: 4930.2839 Line Course: N 01-14-49 E North: 5233.9120 Line Course: S 88-26-19 E North: 5223.9877 Line Course: S 70-50-52 E North: 5141.0001 Line Course: N 01-21-10 E North: 5270.9639 Curve Length: 386.5456 Delta: 23-48-52 chord: 383.7687 Course In: S 88-38-51 E RP North: 5249.0127 End North: 5644.5014 Line Course: N 25-10-00 E North: 5688.7415 East 10711.8353 Length: 1361.5200 East : 9350.6251 Length: 659.4872 East : 9336.6476 Length: 31.8520 East : 9368.4922 Length: 284.4937 East : 9362.3811 Length: 123.3855 East : 9485.7372 Length: 184.5267 East : 9489.7268 Length: 203.4119 East : 9693.0913 Length: 12.3338 East : 9692.8229 Length: 297.6000 East : 9990.3124 Length: 303.7000 East : 9996.9214 Length: 364.2200 East : 10361.0061 Length: 252.9500 East : 10599.9554 Length: 130.0000 East : 10603.0245 Radius: 930.0000 Tangent: 196.1039 Course: N 13-15-35 E Course out: N 64-49-59 w East 11532.7654 East 10691.0478 Length: 48.8800 East : 10711.8342 Perimeter: 4644.9058 Area: 830,696 sq. ft. 19.07 acres Mapcheck Closure - (uses listed courses and chords) Error Closure: 0.0011 Course: N 89-54-01 w Error North: 0.00000 East :-0.00112 Precision 1: 4,220,117.7273 Page 1 I k TOOT'S 0 ,�(LOUBMITTED MAY 1 2 2005 Parcel name: Lot 10 North: 5064.8135 Line Course: S 88-45-46 E North: 5058.4439 Line Course: N 01-12-52 E North: 5687.7896 Line Course: N 88-46-40 w North: 5694.0821 Line Course: S 01-12-52 w North: 5064.8134 Lot 10-Lot-Closure.txt East : 9041.7163 Length: 295.0000 East : 9336.6476 Length: 629.4872 East : 9349.9892 Length: 295.0000 East : 9055.0563 Length: 629.4100 East : 9041.7163 Perimeter: 1848.8972 Area: 185,687 sq. ft. 4.26 acres Mapcheck Closure - (uses listed courses and chords) Error Closure: 0.0000 Course: S 34-58-04 w Error North:-0.00003 East :-0.00002 Precision 1: 1,848,897,200.0000 Page 1 Parcel name: Tract Y North: 5717.7829 Line course: S 01-12-52 w North: 5687.7897 Line course: N 88-46-40 W North: 5694.0821 Line course: N 01-12-52 E North: 5724.0753 Line Course: S 88-46-40 E North: 5717.7829 Tract-Y-Lot-Closure.txt East : 9350.6251 Length: 30.0000 East : 9349.9892 Length: 295.0000 East : 9055.0563 Length: 30.0000 East : 9055.6922 Length: 295.0000 East : 9350.6251 Perimeter: 650.0000 Area: 8,849 sq. ft. 0.20 acres Mapcheck closure - (uses listed courses and chords) Error closure: 0.0000 course: s 90-00-00 E Error North: 0.00000 East : 0.00000 Precision 1: 650,000,000.0000 Page 1 RESUBMIT iED � MAYAY 1 2 2005DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I��f1 33325 81h Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 Federal Way 253_835- t Fax 253-835-2609 www.c w.ciityo ffederai way.com HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY STATEMENT CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AND WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS I. WHY SHOULD THIS INVENTORY STATEMENT BE FILLED OUT? Critical Aquifer Recharge (CARAs) and Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) are considered "critical areas" pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC), Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection." This inventory statement must be filled out by the applicant or agent for any proposed activity listed in Section 11 of this handout, and which are located within Wellhead Capture Zones 1, 5, and 10 as shown on the Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas Maps. Please refer to the handout on Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas for a description of the review process. H. ACTIVITIES GOVERNED BY CARA AND WHPA REGULATIONS The inventory statement must be filled out for the following activities: • Construction of any residential structure, including single-family development • Construction of any barn or other agricultural structure • Construction of any office, school, commercial, recreational, service, or storage building • Construction of a parking lot of any size • Other minor new construction (see WAC 197-11-800[21) • Additions or modifications to or replacement of any building or facility (does not include tenant improvements) • Demolition of any structure • Any landfill or excavation ■ Installation of underground tanks • Any division of land, including short plats • Change of use, which involves repair, remodeling, and maintenance activities • Dredging • Reconstruction/maintenance of groins and similar shoreline protection structures. • Replacement of utility cables that must be buried under the surface of the bedlands • Repair/rebuilding of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs • Installation or construction of any utility, except for on -going operation and maintenance activities of public wells by public water providers + Personal wireless service facilities 05-100131 Project Name 45T Applicant ¢ WC—C��'Il 44A - 4 Project Location Tracking No. aS -Io0 1!61_��Cxn -i�'P 05 —st. III. TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 133-.5,1! Please provide the approximate quantity of the types of hazardous materials or deleterious substances that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity. If no hazardous materials will be involved, please proceed to Section IV. MATERIAL LIQUID (gallons) SOLID (pounds) (1) Acid or basic solutions or solids (2) Antifreeze or coolants (3) BIeaches, peroxides, detergents, surfactants, disinfectants, bactericides, algaecides (4) Brake, transmission, hydraulic fluids (5) Brine solutions (6) Corrosion or rust prevention solutions (7) Cutting fluids (8) Deicing materials (9) Dry cleaning or cleaning solvents (10) Electroplating or metal finishing solutions (11) Engraving or etching solutions (12) Explosives (13) Fertilizers (14) Food or animal processing wastes (15) Formaldehyde (16) Fuels, additives, oils, greases (17) Glues, adhesives, or resins (18) Inks, printing, or photocopying chemicals (19) Laboratory chemicals, reagents or standards (20) Medical, hospital, pharmaceutical, dental, or veterinary fluids or wastes (21) Metals (hazardous e.g. arsenic, copper, chromium lead mercury, silver, etc. (22) Paints, pigments, dyes, stains, varnish, sealers. (23) Pesticides, herbicides or poisons (24) Plastic resins, plasticizers, or catalysts (25) Photo development chemicals (26) Radioactive sources (27) Refrigerants, cooling water (contact) (28) Sludges, still bottoms (29) -Solvents; thinners, paint removers or strippers (30) Tanning (leather) chemicals (3 1 ) Transformer, capacitor oils/fluids, PCB's (32) Waste oil (33) Wood preservatives (34) List OTHER hazardous materials or deleterious substances on a separate sheet. Bulletin #056 — November 24, 2004 Page 2 of 3 k:\Handouts\l-lazardous Materials Inventory Statement r Project Name 'T Frri•1�15 �PtTPL Applicant Project Location �tisrr� gr� .�?r � W Tracking No. r_Z7 -lOa M) -OXOr- -00 -01? IV. FURTHER INFORMATION (oO 1352 I0013�r I.1 Provide the approximate quantity of fill and source of fill to be imported to the site. [ate Quanti of Imported Fill Source of Fill GY FAc'-r-IQOT Got�LT�P�T�') T M r-�r7 t I .-, 2A1lt✓ L. V IT . r•la�L � +k� C��]artil.Tt"��F !� 1 h f�f�-T a�-`� � � �� SO I U-=, -VOV-1" S i -T !E;�: CP-Aj::�[ T• Check [Sox # i if you do not plan to store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous material or deleterious substance listed in Section 111. Check box(s) #2 through #5 (and fill in appropriate blanks) of the below table if they apply to your facility or activity, Check any of the following items that currently exist or are proposed in connection with the development of the site. KID K—, SIGNATURE Date a Print Name Ifyou have any questions about filling out this application form, please call the Department of Community Development Services at 253-835-2607. Please be advised that an application for a development permit lacking the required information will not be accepted Bulletin #056 — November 24, 2004 Page 3 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hnzardous Materials Inventory Statement CITY OF A�k Federal Way April 5, 2005 Brent and April Ost 34603 0' Place South Federal Way, WA 98023 ~1FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #05-100131-00-UP; St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements . Dear Mr. & Mrs. Ost: On February 28, 2005, the City received your comment letter regarding the proposed parking lot improvements at the St. Francis Hospital. Your comments refer to loss of trees, fencing and privacy, lighting, drainage, and neighborhood impacts from the proposal. Your comments have been forwarded to the applicant. City response to your comments are discussed below. Trees, fencing, and privacy — You expressed concerns about the proposed removal of trees on the hospital property north of your home. Response: The Federal Way City Cade (FWCC) regulates the removal of trees that meet the definition of a significant tree.' Should more than 75 percent of the significant trees be removed from the subject site, the FWCC requires that replacement trees be installed in conjunction with the application in a 1 to 4 ratio x Staff has requested that the applicant provide information about the quantity of trees that meet the definition of significant and provide a development plan identifying the significant trees that are proposed to be retained, removed, transplanted, or replaced including a final report on the percentage retained. To date, this information has not been received. Landscape requirements of FWCC Section 22-1566(h) call for a minimum of 15 feet of Type I landscaping between the hospital zoning district and the residential zoning districts The applicant has depicted this planting requirement as well as a six-foot tall fence along the south property line of the proposed parking lot. Staff has requested information about other methods proposed to mitigate light and glare from the proposed parking lot on the residential zone. Additional measures may be proposed by the applicant to address parking area impacts on adjacent residential uses. However, the City cannot require additional landscape width or fence height other than noted in the FWCC unless the applicant does not provide appropriate mitigation for identified adverse environmental impacts. 1 A significant tree is defined as an evergreen or deciduous tree twelve inches in diameter measured four and one half feet above the ground; in good health; and not detrimental to the community, dead, diseased, etc. Red alder, cottonwood, big leaf maple, and poplar trees, no matter the size, are not considered significant trees pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(b). 2 Evergreen replacement trees shall be a minimum of ten feet in height at the time of planting, while deciduous replacement trees shall be three-inch caliper. 3 Type I landscaping is intended to provide a solid sight barrier to totally separate incompatible land uses, Type I landscaping typically consists of evergreen trees a minimum of six feet in height, tall shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height at the time of planting, and ground cover backed by a 100 percent sight -obscuring fence. Mr. & Mrs. Ost April 5, 2005 Page 2 Light and Glare — You expressed concern with lighting and glare concerns to your property from the new parking lot. Response: Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-954(c), glare from the subject property is prohibited and the applicant is required to select, place, and direct light sources so that glare produced by any light source, to the maximum extent possible, does not extend to adjacent properties or to the right-of-way. As noted above, the City has requested additional information about proposed mitigation for light and glare. Drainage — You expressed concerns about project drainage impacting your property. Response: The parking lot expansions shall be required to comply with the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and City amendments to the manual. A Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) dated December 27, 2004, prepared by Dowl Engineers for the proposed parking lot expansion notes that runoff from the new parking lot will be concentrated and discharged into the existing storm sewer at the north end of 4`h Place South, and that the stormwater will receive water quality treatment through use of compost filters as provided in the KCSWDM. This report is available at the City for review. A full drainage review will be required before any construction permits can be issued. Procedures This notice of application provides opportunity for interested parties to submit comments on the Process III, SEPA, and Binding Site Plan applications. Your comments will be considered as we proceed with review of the project. Process III land use applications are administratively processed pursuant to FWCC Section 22-386 et al, and can be approved by the Director of Community Development Services only if the requirements of FWCC Sections 22-395(b) are meta Only persons who submit written comments to the Director of Community Development Services or specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the Director's decisions. The Director administratively issues a determination on the environmental application. A 14-day comment period followed by a 14-day appeal period will commence following issuance of an environmental decision. The Director will also render an administrative decision on the amendment to the existing St. Francis Hospital Binding Site Plan. If you would like to discuss this proposal or review the application, I would be glad to meet with you. If you have any further comments, please contact me at deb.barker@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2642. Sincerely, Deb Barker Associate Planner enc: FWCC Section 395 FWCC Section 954 c: Mr. Toby Coenen, Dow] Engineering, 8320 1541h Avenue NE, Redmond, WA 98052 Mr. Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company, 1325 41h Avenue, Suite 1035, Scatile, WA 98101 Kevin Peterson, Public Works Engineer Raid Tirhi, Traffic Engineer 4 Copy enclosed. 05-100131 Doc. 1. D. 31080 CITY OF .� Federal Way April 5, 2005 Mr. Milo Kurle 34604 4 h Place South Federal Way, WA 98023 �lFILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal wa y. com RE: File #05-100131-00-UP; St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Dear Mr. Kurle: - On February 28, 2005, the City received your comment letter regarding the proposed parking lot improvements at the St. Francis Hospital. You stated "the affected residential areas should be afforded an appropriate consideration of the short and long term impacts of the project on hospital's neighbors." Your comments were forwarded to the applicant. City response to your comments are discussed below. Parking Lot Traffic — You stated that most of the traffic from the new parking lot will go through the outpatient lot past your back yard to the main road, creating increases in glare, noise, and exhaust. Response: As discussed below, the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) requires that varying land uses be separated by a minimum of 15 feet of Type I landscaping in addition to a solid screening fence.' The applicant has proposed to install 15 feet of landscaping and a wood fence to meet this requirement. The applicant can propose to increase the landscaping to mitigate development impacts. However, the City cannot require additional landscape width other than noted in the Federal Way City Code (FWCC) unless the City identified significant adverse environmental impacts through the environmental review process. Light and Glare— You noted that the height of the proposed parking lot above the existing adjacent residential uses will exacerbate noise and glare impacts; and you propose several additional separation measures. Response: FWCC Section 22-1567(e)(2), states that parking areas adjacent to residential zones shall reduce the visual impact of parking areas and buffer dwelling units from light, glare, and other environmental intrusions by providing Type I landscaping within required perimeter landscape areas. hi addition, pursuant to FWCC Section 22-954(c), glare from the subject property is prohibited and the applicant is required to select, place, and direct light sources so that glare produced by any light source, to the maximum extent possible, does not extend to adjacent properties or to the right-of-way. These requirements will be reviewed in conjunction with review of construction permits. Additional measures may be proposed by the applicant to address parking area impacts on adjacent residential uses. A copy of your letter has been forwarded to the applicant for response. 1 Your letter noted that forty feet of landscaping would separate the parking lot from the residential uses. However, the forty feet of landscaping is proposed at the northern portion of the site in conjunction with future roadway improvements, while fifteen feet of landscaping is proposed at the southern end of the proposed parking lot. Mr.l&le April 5, 2005 Page 2 Landscaping — You urged retention of cedar trees in the landscape buffers. Response: As noted above, landscape requirements of FWCC Section 22-1566(h) call for a minimum of 15 feet of Type I landscaping between the office zoning district and the residential zoning district. Type I landscaping is intended to provide a solid sight barrier to totally separate incompatible land uses, and consists of evergreen trees, tall shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height at the time of planting, and ground cover backed by a 100 percent sight -obscuring fence. Evergreen trees planted in the Type I planting areas shall be a minimum of six feet in height at the time of planting. Any trees required in conjunction with the replacement of significant trees as provided for in FWCC Section 22-1568 shall be a minimum of ten feet in height at the time of planting. The applicant has depicted Type I planting requirement as well as a six-foot tall fence along the south property line of the proposed parking lot. Information about significant trees will be reviewed in conjunction with the Process III review. Public Notice — You indicated that you were not made aware of changes to previous projects at the hospital. Response: The applications involved with the current proposal require that all property owners within 300 feet of the subject site be notified of the land use applications and the environmental determination. All persons who formally request in writing to become "party of record" shall also be notified_ of the land use decision(s). Comment and appeal provisions are available for each decision. Following land use approval, the applicant would submit construction drawing for the parking lot proposal, including engineering plans and landscape plans. These would be reviewed by staff for conformance with the FWCC, the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and for any conditions of approval from environmental review and/or the land use decision? No public notice is involved with the construction permit process. You may contact the Planner on the project to remain up to date on the status of the project. Any person may request copies of submitted plans for a nominal charge. Procedural Information The notice of application provides opportunity for interested parties to submit comments on the Process III, SEPA, and Binding Site Plan applications. Process III land use applications are administratively processed by the City pursuant to FWCC Section 22-386 et al, and can be approved by the Director of Community Development Services only if the requirements of FWCC Section 22-395(b) are met. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director of Community Development Services or specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the Director's decisions. The director administratively issues a determination on the environmental application. A 14-day comment period followed by a 14-day appeal period will commence following issuance of an environmental decision. The Director will also render an administrative decision on the amendment to the existing St. Francis Hospital Binding Site Plan. z The Director of Community Development Services can administratively approve a requested modification to use or site configuration of an approved site plan if it is determined that there will not be substantial changes impacts on the neighborhood or the City as a whole as a result of the change pursuant to FWCC Section 22-411(b). Public notice is not required for approved modifications. Please contact the Planner to be updated on the status of the project. Any person may request copies of any submitted plans for a charge. 05-100131 Doc I.D. 31081 Mr. Kurle April 5, 2005 Page 3 If you would like to discuss this proposal or review the application I would be glad to meet with you. If you have any further comments, please contact me at deb.barker@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2642. Sincerely, Deb Barker Associate Planner enc: CPTED checklist FWCC Section 954 FWCC Section 386 c: Mr. Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineering, 8320 150 Avenue NE, Redmond, WA 98052 Mr. Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company, 1325 4`h Avenue, Suite 1035, Seattle, WA' 98101 Kevin Peterson, Public Works Engineer Raid Tirhi, Public Works Traffic Engineer 05-100131 Doc 1 D. 31081 FILE CITY OF •_ Federal `flay April 6, 2005 Mr. Lyle Whipple 34608 40' Place South Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. ci tyoffede ral wa y. com RE: File #05-100131-00-UP; St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Dear Mr. Whipple: On February 25, 2005, the City received your comment letter regarding the proposed parking lot improvements at the St. Francis Hospital. Your comments refer to site construction activities, including compacting equipment, safety and security of the proposed parking lot, and neighborhood impacts from the proposal. Your comments were forwarded to the applicant with a request for response. City response to your comments are discussed below. Construction Activities — You indicate that earth moving and compacting activities from previous hospital expansion projects affected your property and that of your neighbors. ReWonse: The current applications for the parking lot expansion do not indicate any specific construction techniques for the proposed work. The applicant is requested to identify specific construction related activities proposed for this project, and the applicant is responsible to mitigate all project related impacts. Please be advised that work hours for approved construction activities at the site are limited to 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Friday and from 9:00 AM to 8:00 PM on Saturday, pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-1006. No development activity or use of heavy equipment may occur after 8:00 PM Saturday or at any time on Sunday or holidays observed by the City unless approved in writing by the Director of Community Development Services. Safety — You state that no matter how well lit the new parking lot is, it creates potential safety concerns for the patients and staff as well as adjacent neighbors. You request that existing fencing be extended and expanded and that vegetation be added to this area adjacent to the residential uses. Speed bumps are suggested to reduce speeding in the parking lot. Response: The applicant has submitted a Crime Prevention Though Environmental Design (OPTED) checklist; a copy is enclosed. The responses in this document will be analyzed with the environmental and land use applications, including review by the City's Police Department. Landscape requirements of FWCC Section 22-1566(h) call for a minimum of 15 feet of Type I landscaping between the office zoning district and the residential zoning district. Type I landscaping is intended to provide a solid sight barrier to totally separate incompatible land uses, and consists of evergreen trees, tall shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height at the time of planting, and ground cover backed by a 100 percent Mr. Whipple N11 April b, 2005 A Page 2 sight -obscuring fence. The applicant has depicted this planting requirement as well as a six-foot tall fence along the south property line of the proposed parking lot. Any fencing over six feet in height requires that a building permit be obtained. The applicant can elect to install traffic calming devices such as speed humps; however, there is no requirement for traffic calming devices in private parking lots. Trees — You inquire if the removal of trees on the site north of your property will require you to remove your trees. Response: There is no code to require the removal of trees adjacent to a cleared site. Light and Glare — You expressed concern with lighting and glare concerns to your property from the new parking lot. Response: Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-954(c), glare from the subject property is prohibited and the applicant is required to select, place, and direct light sources so that glare produced by any light source, to the maximum extent possible, does not extend to adjacent properties or to the right-of-way. This requirement will be reviewed in conjunction with the building permit application. Procedures This notice of application provides opportunity for interested parties to submit comments on the Process III, SEPA, and Binding Site Plan applications. Process III land use applications are administratively processed by the City pursuant to FWCC Section 22-386 et al, and can be approved by the Director of Community Development Services only if the requirements of FWCC Section 22-395(b) are met.' Only persons who submit written comments to the Director of Community Development Services or specifically request a copy of the original decision may appeal the Director's decisions. The Director administratively issues a determination on the environmental application. A 14-day comment period followed by a 14-day appeal period will commence following issuance of an environmental decision. The Director will also render an administrative decision on the amendment to the existing St. Francis Hospital Binding Site Plan. If you would like to discuss this proposal or review the application, I would be glad to meet with you. If you have any further comments, please contact me at deb.barker@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2642. Sincerely, Deb Barker Associate Planner enc: CPTED Checklist FWCC Section 22-954 c: Mr. Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineering, 8320 150 Avenue NE, Redmond, WA 98052 Mr. Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company, 1325 4 h Avenue, Suite 1035, Seattle, WA 98101 Kevin Peterson, Public Works Engineer Raid Tirhi, Traffic Engineer 1 Copy enclosed. 05-100131 Doc. LD. 30955 FILE CITY OF Federal Way August 16, 2005 Mr. Tim Rector FWASC, LLC PO Box 890 Black Diamond, WA 98010 RE: File #05-100132-000-00-SE; SEPA COMMENT LETTER St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Dear Mr. Rector: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Thank you for your comments on the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) decision for the above - referenced proposal. Your August 10, 2005 comment letter, was provided to the City in response to the Determination of Nonsign f cance (DNS). You are requesting that a full traffic analysis be completed for the proposal and that an adequate road maintenance agreement be executed for 6`h Avenue South. This letter briefly responds to your comments and provides information regarding the next steps for this application. Your comment letter has been forwarded to Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer, and Raid Tirhi, Senior Traffic Engineer, as well as the applicant's agent, Toby Coenen with Dowl Engineers. According to City Traffic staff, the St. Francis Hospital parking lot expansion project will not generate any new trips on City streets. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) report was not required for this application as the project does not generate more than 10 peak hour trips, the minimum threshold criteria for requiring a TIA report. The new parking lot may result in a change of traffic distribution that may change traffic volumes on 6 h Avenue South, a private road. However, the issue of usage extent of the private road between neighboring properties is outside of the jurisdiction of the Public Works Department. The City does not enforce private easement agreements between property owners. The applicant submitted a Parking Narrative prepared by Dowl Engineers dated December 27, 2004, and a Parking Needs Analysis memo from The Transpo Group dated March 25, 2004, to identify traffic issues and mitigation. I understand that you have been provided with copies of those documents. CONCLUSION After careful consideration of the comments, I am retaining the DNS as issued. Any appeal of the DNS must be received by August 24, 2005, and include a $109.00 filing fee. In regards to the next steps, the City will issue a Process III land use decision at the conclusion of the environmental process. This is an administrative decision; you will be forwarded a copy of that decision as a party of record. The land use decision is appealable to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner as provided for in FWCC. Mr. Rector August 16, 2005 Page 2 If you have any further questions or would like to review the project files, please contact Deb Barker, Interim Senior Planner, at 253-835-2642. Sincerely, Kathy McClung Director of Community Development Services Responsible Environmental Official c: Deb Barker, Interim Senior Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Raid Tirhi, Senior Traffic Engineer Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineers, 9320 154"' Avenue NE, Redmond, WA 98052 Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company, 1325 4'h Avenue, Suite 1035, Seattle, WA 98101 05-100132 Doc I.D. 32939 CITY OF Federal August 16, 2005 Mr. Milo Kurle 34604 46` Place South Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 y Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #05-100132-000-00-SE; SEPA COMMENT LETTER St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Dear Mr. Kurle: Thank you for your comments on the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) decision for the above - referenced proposal. Your comment letter was provided to the City in response to the Determination of Nonsignifzcance (DNS). Your comments indicate that the changes that the hospital has made to the parking lot proposal seem to be consistent with previous concerns you have made both in writing and at a neighborhood meeting. You have been meeting with hospital representatives regarding mitigation measures proposed by the hospital to address lighting concerns, and you feel that progress to date has been very encouraging. The City will issue a Process III land use decision at the conclusion of the environmental process. This is an administrative decision; you will be forwarded a copy of that decision as a party of record. The land use decision is appealable to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner as provided for in FWCC. If you have any further questions or would like to review the project files, please contact Deb Barker, Interim Senior Planner, at 253-835-2642. Sincerely, Kathy McClung Director of Community Development Services Responsible Environmental Official c: Deb Barker, Interim Senior Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineers, 8320 150 Avenue NE, Redmond, WA 98052 Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company, 1325 41h Avenue, Suite 1035, Seattle, WA 98101 05-100132 Doc LD 32982 FILE CITY OF Federal August 11, 2005 Toby Coenen Dowl Engineers 8320 154d Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Way Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal way. com RE: File #05-100132-000-00-SE; SEPA COMMENT LETTER FORWARDED St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Dear Mr. Coenen: This letter forwards a comment letter received in response to the City's Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the above -referenced project. The City issued the DNS determination on July 27, 2005; the comment deadline concluded on August 10, 2005. Enclosed please find a comment letter dated August 10, 2005, from FWASC, LLC signed by Tim Rector. He has enclosed a copy of a recorded Amendment to Roadway Maintenance Agreement. The City will respond in writing to Mr. Rector's comments. Please contact me if you have information that is relevant to the issues contained in Mr. Rector's letter. I can be reached at 253-835-2642 if you have any questions. Regards kJSWUIL--, Deb Barker Associate Planner enclosure c: Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company, 1325 4t' Avenue, Suite 1035, Seattle, WA 98101 05-100132 Doc. I.D. 32837 RECEIVED BY n: • comb�� ffy DEVEI.DPMENT DEPARTMENT AUG i o 2005 FWASC LLC P.O. BOX 890, BLACK DIAMOND, WA 98010 Phone & Fax (253)804-6600 Cell # (253) 670-2456 August 10, 2005 RE: File # 05-100132-00-SE Related File # 05-100131-00-UP To: Kathy McClung Debbie Baker This written response is to your determination of non significance related to an environmental impact statement on the St. Francis Hospital parking lot project. We truly feel there is a need for the new parking lot. We also think that the majority of traffic will be coming up Sixth Street as 61h Street will be the closest entry point to the parking lot. This increase in traffic would definitely be an adverse effect to the local environment Sixth Street, as you know is a private road. We would like to request the following: 1) A full traffic analysis to be completed very similar to any new development 2) An adequate road maintenance agreement be in place for when 6th Street deteriorates under the increased usage. I have enclosed a copy of a road maintenance agreement that was signed by all of the other owners of 6' Street back in April, 2004. The only signature missing on this document is the Franciscan Health System -West. This amendment would update and clarify the existing road maintenance agreement. Sincerely, C�j VvL.T�,�Y 1 Managing Member FWASC, LLC r, lmponr PropertY 0—lop-1 Tim Rector Cell Phone (253) 670-2456 Office (253) 804-6600 Fax (360) 886-9805 E-mail tarrat890@comcast.net P.O. Box 890 Black Diamond, Washington 98010-0890 When Recorded Return to: Mark Stanfield Crescent Realty, Inc P.O. Box 580 Spanaway, WA 98387 200 043 00 35 :dE::'t'k6 ""° 30.00 AMENDMENT TO ROADWAY MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Reference Number(s) of Related Documents (if applicable): 8906050108 Grantor: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington; WALLER ROAD IV ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership; FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST; MTS ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.; and JARSTAD FAMILY, L.L.0 Grantee: WALLER ROAD IV ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of NE 114, S W '14, S 20, T 21 N, R 4 E Full Legal Description attached on Exhibits "A" through "E" Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: 926480-0010-03, 926480-0020-01, 202104-9178-04, 7f0451-0010-01, 790451-0020-00, 7-0451-0030-08, 760451-0040-06, 7S}451-0060-01, 730451-0070-09, 750451-0080-07, 7,90451-0090-05, 70451-0100-03, 790451-0110-01 THIS AMENDMENT, entered into this � day of t 2004, by and between the LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "the District'); WALLER ROAD IV ASSOCIATES, a Washington general partnership, successor in interest to GRANA INVESTMENTS, a Washington General Partnership (hereinafter "WRIVA"); FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST (hereinafter referred to as "Franciscan"); NITS ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. (hereinafter referred to as "NITS"), and JARSTAD FAMILY, L.L.C. (hereinafter "Jarstad") as follows: r7n,LPL, � C:,, INTERNET FIEMONTENTIE5OPAZSIQ=tTCO-.IVIXN-GWRA-AMOM R- -l- [7r :i % W1 2004 M.AGMT.60C F� LE _ � � � I � � I C WHEREAS, the parties herein are the current owners of property situate in Federal Way, Washington, in the locality of 6th Avenue South lying north of South 348th Street; and WHEREAS, in 1989, Grana Investments and Franciscan, who were then the owners of all parcels other than the District property, executed a Roadway Maintenance Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement"), which was recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 8906050108, providing for the maintenance of a private roadway (commonly known as 6th AN,cnue South) described therein, a length of which roadway was constructed over a portion of the District property referenced in the Agreement, which property is subject to an easement in favor of the property owned by Franciscan; and WHEREAS, WRrVA, the present owner of parcel designated in the Agreement as Parcel 926480-0010-03, desires to clarify as a matter of record its access rights over and across the portion of the roadway lying on District property; and WHEREAS, the District and WRIVA are executing with this Amendment and easement for such access which is to be subject to the terms of this Amendment; and WHEREAS, the parties believing that the rights and obligations expressed herein are mutually beneficial; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AGREED as follows: 1. This Amendment and the terms herein shall amend the Roadway Maintenance Agreement, which was recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 8906050108. 2. The parties hereby agree that a new paragraph, herein designated as Paragraph 10, shall be added and included within the Agreement to read as follows: 10. Limitations on Use of Roadway. For the benefits to be derived therefrom, the parties agree that the use of the roadway shall be limited to passenger and light duty commercial delivery vehicles and in no event shall vehicles be permitted to use the roadway to transport any cargo of hazardous, toxic or flammable materials or any substance that if spilled on or adjacent to the roadway might jeopardize the District's wells or well site and the public water supply furnished thereby; provided, however, that the foregoing limitations shall not apply to vehicles delivering or retrieving usual and ordinary medical supplies and substances, emergency vehicles, refuse collection and other public utility vehicles, and construction vehicles and equipment during the construction, remodel and repair of any buildings and related improvements on the affected properties. In order that all occupants of the building or buildings situated on the properties covered by the Agreement and this Amendment are aware of the C:IDOCUMENTS AND SETTINGSIOWNEMWCAL SETTING &TE41PORARV -2- 3/19/2004 INTERNET FILEMONTENT IESLOPAZSlOV\XITCO-JVX-WRA-AMDMT-R- M-AGMT.DOC restrictions set forth herein, the parties agree on behalf of themselves and their successors in interest to deliver to all existing and future tenants or other occupants of said building(s) a copy of this Amendment, and to include within and as a part of any future lease or rental agreement the lessee or tenant's obligation to comply with and abide by the restrictions set forth herein. 3. The parties hereby agree that a new paragraph, herein designated as Paragraph 11, shall be added and included within the Agreement to read as follows: 11. Placement of Signs. WRIVA shall pay for and erect a sign or signs, at the northwest intersection of 6t" Avenue South and South 348`" and at or along the intersection of the St. Francis property and 6�" Avenue South sufficient to indicate to the public and with a design and content satisfactory to the District that the roadway covered by this Agreement is a private road and that no cargo of hazardous, toxic or flammable materials may be transported over and across the roadway or any portion thereof. The parties hereto shall maintain said sign as a part of the general maintenance obligations arising under this agreement. 4. The parties hereby agree that Paragraph 4 entitled "Proportionate Share" shall be amended to modify the proportionate shares assigned to each parcel to reflect changes in ownership and lot divisions occurring since the date of the original agreement as follows: TAX PARCEL CURRENT OWNER COST SHARE 926480-0010-03 WRIVA 18.74% 926480-0020-01 MTS 17.88% 202104-9178-04 Jarstad 12.29% 7.40451-0010-01 Franciscan 51.09% 790451-0020-00 Franciscan 790451-0030-08 Franciscan 750451-0040-06 Franciscan 790451-0060-01 Franciscan 70451-0070-09 Franciscan 7.;0451-0080-07 Franciscan 750451-0090-05 Franciscan 750451-0100-03 Franciscan 7P451-0110-01 Franciscan 100% C:1DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGWWNERILOCAL SETTINGSITEMPORARY 3/1912004 INTERNET FILESICONTENT.IE5kOPAZSLOW(fTCO}W-WRA-AMDMT-R- -3- M-AGMT. DOC 5. It is agreed that the District shall not be obligated for any costs or other obligations set forth in this Agreement or this Amendment, and that its consideration for this Amendment is the continued use by all of the parties of the portion of the District property over which the roadway lies, the commercial and other benefits of which inure mutually and separately to each of the other parties. 6. The terms of this Amendment shall constitute a covenant running with the land and shall be binding on each and every successor in interest to the property covered herein. 7. All terms of the Agreement to the extent not herein amended shall remain in full force and effect. 8. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes, constitute an original, but all of which taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execuA this en ent to Roadway Maintenance Agreement on the day and year first above tte . LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT, WA IV ASSOCIATES, a municipal corporation a Wa i e eral partnership By: Jllj �, - By; Its: G e Its: 2^ FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST By: Its: JARSTAD FAMILY, L.L.C. By: S CD M Its: ri r e-p Q%DOCUMENTS AND SETTING&OWNEMLOCAL SETTING&TEMPORARY -�- 3/19/2004 INTERNET FILESICONTENT.IE5%OPAZSLQMITCO-JVX-WRA-AMDMT-R- M-AGMT DOC STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that��A'T.IR? r-1j is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrume t, onf oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the l"t? new , l LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in he instrument. DATED this �2" day of ` i1 �� ![�(� 2004. K. MoGe v 5S10N # �' NOTARY ' PUBLIC �FWASK�� Notary Seal STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF 5 e 17 (Name) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at: My Commission Expires: 5 • 3 D b I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that -10A n V • / Je O is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Cr@,,jerj Lk rt►s r ,- of WALLER ROAD IV ASSOCIATES to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED this day of r� r ty0T4gR ►' e.. m . • i re ul: i OajuC Notary Seal C1DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\OWNER\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY _ C INTERNET FILES\CONTENT.IE5\OPAZSLOV\XITCO-JVX-WRA-AMDMT-R- _J M-AGMT DOC 2004 (Name) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at: f r er My Commission Expires: 8' 3/1912004 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED this day of Notary Seal STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF Ki � ) ss. , 2004. (Name) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at: My Commission Expires: I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that A r3j5La, L 4�r-,N is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the 'it WAS &,- of MTS ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes men ion d in the instrument. DATED this Z (P day of —4&-( (- . 2004. EL 70 ON of PUB0 2 CADOCUMENTS AND SETTINGSIOWNERILOCAL SETTINGSITEMPORARY _ L INTERNET FILESICONTENT.IE5IOPAZSLQVIXITCO-JVX-WRA-AMDMT-R- _V M-AGMT DOC 1 .(Name) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at: v EI My Commission Expires. 2-- I -- 0 19 3/19/2004 Notary Seal STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF tKtN - _ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �v►k+•s S, r0e-%"W]is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrut, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the AzE5 •en-6Q of JARSTAD FAMILY, L.L.C. to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED this Z ltt day of pr 2004. Notary Seal C:\D000MENTS AND SETTINGS\OWNER\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY _'_ INTERNET FILES\CONTENT.IE5\OPAZSLQV\XITCO-JVX-WRA-AMDMT-R- M-AGMT.DOC m 'A--j ►FL.. ►t-1t-t+d42w-- (Name) NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at: My Commission Expires: -1lql iql' 3/19/2004 EXHIBIT" " ).. LUD parcel A as depicted all Exhibit 'E-) Di9trict Legal: The South 290 feet Of the South one- the North 380 feet of the Northees t quaxter Zvf of the East half a fa a t one-hrlf the 5outbwest the Kest half or th �1 North. Range i East. W.H. , q�axtR, Of Sec in KingC tiara �0, 7'ovnshl aunty. washiriyton: TOGETHER HITH the East 380 feet aF the 44 fret of the south 28 half ❑ f Meat one-half of the South feet of vle Nort the west half of the Northeast one-half qunxter of said sectla 4Varrer of the Eas �+ 1�. of the SouthmestN Legal Description of Sanitary Serer basement on L-Shaped Property: The East 25 feet of the South 700 feet and the sou the fast 200 feet of the North 100 Feet sou' 25 feet of described above. of Grantor's parcel € •� 4ry e EXHIBIT" $ » WRIVA (Parcel B—Z as depicted an attached map) THAT PORTION OF LOT 7, Vv'-F 1 C.4.14pUS B USD4 SS PA PL4TTfEREpF I�ECORDFI] QN VQLLJtsiF 97 OF PUl7S. PAGES 8 BORDINL TOVE !E K-NG COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOIVS. NCfla4GATTIgSO 1'14'49' E AO�sTCOMERGFSLOT2.T`� -HEWFSTllNET3-iER�0=32NCF PROCEEDING 9.00 FCET TO THE TR1E 1NTB rGQ�II�{G� T�iENCE CONING N 0 V14'49' EALONG SAm WEST LLNE 16 3.2 6 f EET, -ME CES�F6'19-E 297.Gj) FEE7'.THENCE S 01'I4'49' W 14.3Q FEET, THENCE S zs'4z ts' THENCE S 71'58 ST E 19.08 FEET, -ONCE S ol'16'17- W 1.04 FEES', THENCE N 71'58'57' W 15.95 FEET THENCE N 08'44152' W 314.88 BEGLNNING, SITUATE LN DING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. FEET To THE p0 CNi ❑F EXHIBIT " Co 01 (MTS Parcel C an depicted on zxhibit."B") M-t'port cn of lot 2, V-st campe ami.r►rs: park, W-cording (u the plat tha;eal rec=rfed in Yoltme 97 of r1m, pie 78-82, Lmlusive, in i(!aZ County, �-`'-'r4t:n x:e pa:tiwlarly desc:!bed as follcvs: Ceme ing at t-tia Sout'�s+est canner of said lot 2, heraLm!ter cefe_:er+ to as the true point: of beg In Ln4: ')v--,c t Ller U-a ♦rest lim thutof cort.1% 0101069" East -329.a3 feet, liuraca Scut � 63'152" Fast 374.11 feat to ■ p2Lnt -h-'c t st slgi,t esngleff feat 5oucherly of existing boeavliry tine of j�-t_ lct l; '• i?selxe pxoccadjn; South 71'38457" [sst tlnn� a Line wall.-L to e.^c 1.00 fret Scut_Ar!y of aald boundary tin: 15.93 feet; Thence Sou r-S 01' 16 L 7" Rest 2D6.40 feet; 1he--=4 Nor % 88'"`S2" pest 7D.00 Meet; 'Thcv--e South 01�L3'll" Vest 120.Da feet to :I_e South Line of Said 12L I; ittcY—'- slong said 5=6 line Rorth 88'es'ti2" Kest 320.01 fe+t to t~e t_ut pobt of begin lr;. Also le:c-nn as Parc_i A of King County Lot Line Acjus_Ter+c No. 690x1:. EXHIBIT" (Jarstad - Parcel F as depicted on Exhibit *V) PARCH A The %st one-half of the South hal! cf the East half of the West half of t`Se Nc._L -_st quart of the Southwest quarter of Section 20, Tawnship 21 North, Range 4 In Xing County, Washingtcn; Except the South SO feet khere=f for rcad; And Except the North 380 feet the_r_-f. PARCH. B Easement for ingress, egress, and utilities over the West- 10• feet of Ect 2, t•.es; zmCl's Business Park, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volune 97 of Plats, ?a;e 70 through 82■ inclusive, in King Countf, Washington. EXHIBIT" 6 FMFICragJ- tl 6OU7H 348TH FILE CITY OF �► Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS File No. 05-100132-00-SE Related File Number: 05-100131-00-UP, 05-100133-00-SU Description: Proposal to construct improvements to existing parking areas, construct a new parking lot, and install related storm drainage facilities. The proposal consists of Phase I, which entails construction of up to 60 new parking stalls along the north and western portions of the subject site; and Phase H, which involves construction of a new 375 stall employee parking lot on a vacant site west of the hospital and the creation of a storm drainage facility on a vacant lot southwest of the hospital. Location: 34519 9 h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Applicant: Toby Coenen, DOWL Engineers for Franciscan Health Systems Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.110. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on August 10, 2005. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. You may appeal this determination to Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way (address below), no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 24, 2005, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Kathy McClung Title: Director, Department of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Date Issued: July 27, 2005 Signature: " �- 05-100132 Doc. LD. 32517 LU;)]S,(S gljeaF; ae3s►0ue.[3 lnnaa — sueld uolleollddy - llwlad asN Pup-1 joke" sluawanoidwl 5UIMJed lell&"H Slouead IS Yli 133HS NOI1dWNOdI /3POHd y -'I t T w it a f p F Ei a a rcw s ¢ Z U I WN 66 2 r t-€ uxWi a a ¢ aJ u a z z o z z �r v�i u�i z z d z z aw i F° ]]{{�yy`rE•'a■■tg�g�o�■ z o w o z z a� Q Q O 6 J Q z I 31 b a 'o w a a o0 G z W a w z a -_.�.. _ c __ III _• 531IN3�V H16 > U '�" a 1 �a5 a dog `� !« Sb-bm oE�g388 ME 5 Roa=.e RSA � �.a i flrld Is cg; y °s i� 6 :Eg =E� o -~+ z y �L M. 4 amO s'!X 8 R 8 8 a 7 5 $fib p8 z WN ° a�� V r 491 ~91 w r 0 d s y �k E E,II � a ^ �.. T__ ��a� xm� mi `ate FILE CITY OF CITY HALL Federal Way Feder 8th Avenue South • Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-971718 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederal wa y. com July 26, 2005 Toby Coenen Dowl En&eers 8320 154 Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 RE: File #05-100132-000-00-SE; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements, 34515 9`s Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Coenen: This office and other City staff have reviewed the environmental checklist you submitted. We have determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A 14-day comment period is required by the SEPA rules (WAC 197-11-340). A notice inviting comments will be published in the Federal Way Mirror on July 27, 2005. At the end of the comment period, the department will determine if the DNS should be withdrawn, modified, or issued as proposed. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the comment deadline. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period. Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the City has been granted. Approval or denial of the proposal will be made by the appropriate administrative or legislative body vested with that authority. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts, as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated City policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after a permit has been issued or City Council action taken, as applicable), you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as set forth in RCW 43.21C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. A copy of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21C.080 and WAC 197-11-680 providing instructions for giving this notice are available from the Department of Community Development Services. The City is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. However, the City is responsible for giving a notice (to parties of record) stating the date for commencing a judicial appeal (including the SEPA portion of that appeal) if your proposal is one for which the City's action on it has a specified time period within which any court appeals must be made. If you need further assistance, feel free to call Deb Barker, Associate Planner, at 253-835-2642. Sincerely, p t- Kathy McClung Director of Community Development Services enc: Copy of DNS c: Deb Barker, Associate Planner 05-I00132 Doc I D. 32519 I'� 1 4ik CITY OF Federal inlay DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Federal Way File #05-100132-00-SE Related Files Nos: 05-100131400-UP, 05-100133-00-SU NOTE: The purpose of this Final Staff Evaluation is to provide technical staff evaluation of the proposed action; supplement information contained in the environmental checklist and expanded studies; provide technical information unavailable to the applicant; correct inaccurate information; and recommend measures to the responsible official to mitigate identified environmental impacts. Technical reports and attachments referenced herein and in the environmental checklist may not be attached to all copies of this evaluation. Copies of reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Deb Barker, Associate Planner, City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8t' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way. Washington, 98063-9718, 253-835-2642. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The applicant proposes to construct improvements to existing parking areas, construct a new parking lot, and install related storm drainage facilities to accommodate the existing hospital population. The proposal consists of Phase I, which entails construction of up to 60 new parking stalls along the north and western portions of the subject site; and Phase H creates a new 375 stall employee parking lot on a vacant site west of the hospital and the creation of a storm drainage facility on a vacant lot southwest of the hospital. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Applicant: Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineers 8320 154 b Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 Agent: Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company 1325 47 Avenue, Suite 1035 Seattle, WA 98101 Owner: Dave Pasqual, Franciscan Health Systems 1717 South "J" Street Tacoma, WA 98405 Location: 34515 9 h Avenue South, within the St. Francis Hospital Campus. The site is located on the west side of 9a' Avenue South between South 344' & South 348t' Streets. Zoning: Office Park (OP) Comprehensive Plan Designation: Office Park M If, b TE NICAL REPORTS The following technical information was submitted as part of the development application: ■ Parking Narrative prepared by Dowl Engineers, December 27, 2004 • Topographic Survey, Phasing plan, Phased site plan, Grading and drainage plans, Utility plans and Landscape plans pages C1 through C8 prepared by Dowl Engineers dated December 17, 2004; revision date May 10, 2005; C6 and C7 revision date May 25, 2005, C1 revision date June 18, 2005, and C1, revision date July 21, 2005 ■ Wetland memorandum from Sheldon and Associates, December 2, 2004 • Preliminary Technical Information Report (TIR) prepared by Dowl Engineers, December 27, 2004 ■ Environmental checklist prepared by Toby Coenen dated January 4, 2005; revision date May 10, 2005; revision date June 21, 2005 ■ Revised Geotechnical Engineering Services prepared by Geoengineers, November 15, 2004 ■ Parking needs analysis memo from The Transpo Group, March 25, 2004 ■ Tree count report prepared by Ross Ensley, October 28, 1999 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A — Vicinity Map Exhibit B — Environmental Checklist Exhibit C — Reduced Scale Site Plan ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Following are staff responses to the elements of the enclosed environmental checklist indicating whether or not City staff concurs with the applicant's response to the checklist item, or staff clarification or amendment of the response. A. BACKGROUND 1-6. Concur with the checklist. 7. Concur with the checklist. The application has been revised to construct 375 new parking stalls under Phase 2. 8. Concur with the checklist. Refer to above list for additional submittal information 9. Concur with the checklist. 10. Land Surface Modification (LSM) will be reviewed in conjunction with Engineering Approvals, and a separate LSM is not required. An amendment to the Binding Site Plan is pending concurrent with land use and environmental applications. 11-12. Concur with the checklist. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth: a-b. Concur with the checklist. Concur with the checklist. The soil classification for the site is Everett-Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loams, 0 — 6 percent slope (EwC). The Alderwood series typically Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File # 05-100132-00-SE / D� I.D. 32489 St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Page 2 consists of a surficial zone of loose to medium -dense, weathered soils comprised of silty sand with gravel, and an underlying layer of consolidated glacial till. Permeability of the upper layer is variable, depending upon compaction. The lower layer is very slowly permeable. d. No portions of the site are within a Landslide or Erosion Hazard Area, as shown on the City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map. e. Concur with the checklist. f. Concur with the checklist. g. As the southern portion of Area 3 will be retained in native vegetation, the impervious surface of Area 3 will decrease to approximately 75 percent. h. The applicant must submit a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESC) consistent with provisions of the FWCC to prevent and/or minimize erosion impacts during the construction phase of the project. Clearing and grading activities are regulated by FWCC Chapter 22, the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), and City amendments to the manual. Post construction erosion potential will be minimized by applicant's compliance with the KCSWDM in designing the proposed on -site stormwater detention facility. In addition, as the site is within a wellhead protection zone, compliance with code provisions will prevent and/or minimize erosion impacts, thus no mitigation measures are necessary. 2. Air: a. Concur with the checklist. Short-term effects to air quality will occur during construction and paving operations. Construction activity contributes to carbon monoxide levels through the operation of construction machinery, delivery equipment and materials, and worker access to the site by automobile. These activities also include the emissions of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen, potentially elevating the level of photochemical oxidants, such as ozone, in the ambient air. Long-term impacts due to vehicle and maintenance equipment, such as lawn mowers and emissions from employees' and patrons' vehicles, will vary in level according to the amount of traffic generated by the proposed restaurant. b. Concur with the checklist. c. Concur with the checklist. Compliance with local, state, and federal air quality standards provides sufficient mitigation of potential air related impacts. 3. Water: 1-6) Concur with the checklist. There are no surface bodies of water on or adjacent to the project site, although the site is located within the Hylebos Creek Basin. A wetland report for the project site and surrounding area was prepared and submitted as part of the project application. Wetlands associated with the West Hylebos Wetlands are located more than 300 feet to the west of the proposed development area. No wetlands were found on or within 100 feet of this parcel. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File # 05-100132-00-SE / Doc. J.D. 32489 St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Page 3 b. Ground 1-2) Concur with the checklist. There are no proposed groundwater withdrawals or discharges associated with the parking lot improvements. The project site is located within the six-month Wellhead Protection Zone of the Redondo Milton Channel Aquifer for Lakehaven Utility District Wells 10 and 10A, and the site is classified as a "High Risk Parcel" for the District's Wellhead Protection Program. These wellheads are located south of the proposed storm drainage facility. The applicant completed a Hazardous Material Inventory Statement for the Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Area and noted that the proposed development will not store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous materials listed in the checklist. This will be reviewed in conjunction with construction permits. C. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Concur with the checklist. A Preliminary Drainage Report, an off -site Drainage System Analysis, and a proposed on -site stormwater pond preliminary design have been submitted in support of the project proposal. On -site storm drainage water quality and detention/retention facilities are required and must be designed in accordance with all Core and Special Requirements outlined in the KCSWDM. Discharge from Area I parking lot improvements will be directed to Lake No. 6, a regional stormwater facility owned and operated by the City of Federal Way and located to the east of the site. Discharge to Lake No. 6 will be at the pre -development rate consistent with the requirements of the KCSWDM. Stormwater from the Area I parking lot will be detained and treated prior to discharge to Lake No. 6. Discharge from Area H and III parking lots will be directed into the proposed storm drainage pond, which will discharge into an existing 12-inch storm drain leading into the City storm drainage system on South 348`h Street. Discharge from the new storm drainage facility will be at the pre -development rate consistent with the requirements of the KCSWDM. Both Lake No. 6 and the South 348`h system drain into West Hylebos Creek and ultimately into Puget Sound. 2) Concur with the checklist. As with all paved, developed areas, the site will contribute some pollutants to ground and surface waters, as these will be washed off the site by stormwater into the drainage system. Pollutants that accumulate on paved surfaces may include heavy metals, petrochemicals, and other substances. Prior to construction of any improvements and/or the proposed building on the site, those portions of the drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the control of surface and stormwater runoff discharging from the site must be constructed and in operation in accordance with all City requirements. See also c.1 and c.2 above. d. Concur with the checklist. Compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations will ensure that surface water impacts are appropriately mitigated. No mitigation measures are necessary. 4. Plants: a. Concur with the checklist. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File # 05-100132-00-SE / nog. I.D. 32489 St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Page 4 b. Revised plans dated July 21, 2005, depict the southern 40 feet of Area 3 retained in its current condition with mature evergreen trees. The applicant will revise the clearing and grading plans in conjunction with land use approval, acknowledging retention of additional trees that meet the FWCC definition of significant tree. c. Concur with the checklist. d. Concur with the checklist. An approved landscape plan in accordance with Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Article XVII is required for this project. Type I Solid Screen landscaping 15 feet in width is required between the adjacent residential subdivision and the new staff parking lot as well as the new storm drainage facility. Also, residential zones shall be screened from parking areas by Type I landscaping, berms, or architectural features that reduce the visual impact of parking areas and screen automobiles. The applicant has proposed to accommodate the screening requirements within the 40-foot wide no -disturbance area at the southern end of the staff parking lot. The proposal will involve the removal of trees that meet the FWCC definition of a significant tree. Tree replacement as identified in FWCC Section 22-1566 and 22-1567 shall be required in conjunction with construction permits. Final review and approval of the proposed landscaping and significant tree mitigation will occur with construction permits. 5. Animals: a-d. The site is located within the Pacific Flyway, a significant route for migratory waterfowl. There is no priority, threatened, or endangered species associated with the subject property. No impacts to animals are anticipated as a result of the proposed development. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a-c. Concur with the checklist. Energy provisions for the project shall conform to applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. Environmental Health: a. Environmental Health Hazards - The project site is located within the six-month Wellhead Protection Zone of the Redondo Milton Channel Aquifer for Lakehaven Utility District Wells 10 and I OA, and the site is classified as a "High Risk Parcel" for the District's Wellhead Protection Program. 1) Concur with the checklist. 2) Normal emergency services are anticipated. The site has access to 9'h Avenue South and South 3480' Street that are suitable for emergency vehicle access. In addition, as the site is within a wellhead protection zone, the applicant shall increase precautions to ensure that activities on the site will not impact the drinking water supply. This will be reviewed in conjunction with construction permits. b. Noise 1-3) Noise levels will increase on a short-term basis during construction. Control measures include required conformance with local noise ordinances regulating hours of construction. An increase in noise levels due to traffic generated by new parking lot is anticipated. However, the increase is anticipated to be minimal over what currently is generated by the adjacent hospital and other nearby commercial and warehouse/ Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File # 05-100132-00-SE / Doc. I.D. 32489 St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Page 5 distribution uses. hi addition, the retention of mature evergreen vegetation adjacent to residential uses will further buffer parking lot noise. Compliance with the code and implementation of the measures outlined in the checklist will sufficiently mitigate noise levels. No further mitigation measures are necessary. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. The subject property and surrounding properties are zoned Office Park (OP), with the exception of a 16-lot subdivision located to the south of the proposed staff parking area. Development of the surrounding OP zoned properties is consistent with the zoning designation and the uses include the St. Francis Hospital, United States Postal Service Bulk Mail Distribution Facility, and a variety of smaller office, warehouse, and distribution facilities. The subdivision to the west is zoned Single Family Residential (RS 9.6) and contains single-family residences consistent with this designation. b-g. Concur with the checklist. h. Concur with the checklist. The project site is located within the six-month Wellhead Protection Zone of the Redondo Milton Channel Aquifer for Lakehaven Utility District Wells 10 and 10A, and the site is classified as a "High Risk Parcel" for the District's Wellhead Protection Program. These wells are located south of the proposed storm drainage facility. The applicant completed a Hazardous Material Inventory Statement for the Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Area and noted that the proposed development will not store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous materials listed in the checklist. This will be reviewed in conjunction with construction permits. The site is located more than 300 feet from a regulated Category I wetland associated with the Hylebos Creek system. No intrusions into the wetland or wetland buffer are proposed. 1-1. Concur with the checklist. 9. Housing: a-c. No housing units will be eliminated, displaced, or created by the project. Thus, no mitigation measures are necessary. 10. Aesthetics: a-c. Forested views from the immediate vicinity will be eliminated by the proposed parking lot improvements. The surrounding neighborhood is a mixture of office, warehouse and distribution, commercial, and single-family residential structures of varying architectural styles. The proposed development is subject to landscaping standards (FWCC Ch. 22, Art. XVII) and Community Design Guidelines (FWCC Ch. 22, Art. XIX). No adverse aesthetic impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed development. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. 11. Light and Glare: a-c. Concur with the checklist. The proposed elevation of the new parking lot is above the ground floor of the adjacent residential structures and glare from automobile headlights may be evident to the residents. To mitigate this impact, the applicant has proposed to: (1) retain a 40-foot wide area of native vegetation at the southern end of the Area 3 parking lot site, consisting of 25 feet of retained vegetation and 15 feet of retained and supplemental vegetation; (2) installation of a solid fence at the southern end of the new parking lot; and Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File # 05-100132-00-SE / Dc Ln. 32489 St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Page 6 (3) installation of solid fencing west of the new storm drainage facility. These features will screen the adjacent residential properties from potential parking lot light pollution and provide an additional measure of privacy. The applicant has further identified mitigative measures for the new parking lot that include shielded or cut-off type lighting fixtures, lower wattage light fixtures, and shorter light poles. A lighting engineer will be retained by the applicant to design lighting to minimize light impacts to neighbors. d. FWCC Sections 22-950 and 22-954 prohibit lighting levels from spilling over onto adjacent properties. The design of the lighting will be reviewed in conjunction with construction permits to verify that code requirements are met. Provisions and requirements of the code will mitigate impacts from light and glare. Thus, no additional mitigation measures are necessary. 12. Recreation: a-c Concur with the checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a-c. Concur with the checklist. No significant adverse historic and cultural preservation impacts are anticipated. Therefore, no mitigation measures are necessary. 14. Transportation: a-g. A March 25, 2004, Parking Needs Analysis and a December 27, 2004, Parking Narrative were prepared by The Transpo Group for the project to identify parking needs of the hospital. The new parking lots are proposed to accommodate existing volumes of traffic generated by the hospital; the Phase 2 parking lot (also known as Area 3) is intended for staff. Based on City policy, traffic related mitigation is identified when the proposed development's trip generation exceeds the net PM threshold of ten trips entering the street improvement projects. The Public Works Traffic Division found that the proposed parking lot development will not impact City Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) projects in which the proposed development exceeds the net 10 PM Peak threshold. The parking improvements installed at the northern portion of Phase I will be located in the eastern portion of Tract Z, a 30-foot wide ingress/egress easement approximately 990 feet in length. Based on the recorded easement, Tract Z and future Tract Y will be dedicated at no cost to the City as right-of-way at such time the Public Works Director deems it necessary. Therefore, any parking stalls proposed to be located within Tract Z shall be deemed temporary and shall not be eligible for any grandfathering or compensation by the City for removal. 15. Public Services: a-b. Concur with the checklist. Comments from the fire and police departments do not indicate that any special emergency services will be required. 16. Utilities: a-b. Concur with the checklist. No pipes that require SEPA review will be installed. The amendment to the Binding Site Plan will depict proposed water easements within and across the parking lot that will provide for future extensions of utility water and sewer services. As previously noted, the site is within a wellhead protection zone and the applicant will be required to ensure that activities on the site will not impact the drinking water supply. This will be reviewed in conjunction with construction permits. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File # 05-100132-00-SE / nog. i n. 32499 St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Page 7 CONCLUSION Based on staff analysis of the application, the completed SEPA checklist, and applicable City and county regulations and policies, the proposal can be found to not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. The DNS is based upon impacts identified within the environmental checklist, attachments, exhibits, and supplemental reports as listed, and the above Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Application, and is supported by plans, policies, and regulations formally adopted by the City for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions. The City reserves the right to review any further revisions or alterations to the site or the proposal in order to determine the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the project at that point in time. Prepared by: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 Date: July 21. 2405 Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist File # 05-100132-00-SE / na. Ln 32489 St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements Page 8 0 v, i 0 U a -I BUILDIrdU DEFT. +;:;,; ;;:;,• BOWL A N w o I w N O R M St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Master Land Use Permit Franciscan Health System ❑ a o�.ne�or, oe u..o Q xn eat x501&&A�� o,WAQW 6=16m�AVENUF E z W3-� <• FAX (42si@WWM S12578 12-27-04 vicinity Map ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1• Name of proposed project, if applicable: J J;V z 3 2005 St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements and Binding Site Plan Amend 2• Name of applicant: meet Franciscan Health System - West (FHS), d/b/a St. Francis Hospital 3• Address and phone number of applicant and contact er Address: person: 1717 South 'J' Street rn (253Tacoma, WA 98405 7325 4 Ave, #7035 Telephone No.: Seattle, WA 98101 Contact Person: ) 426-6835 Dave Pasqual (206) 464-4200 4• Date checklist prepared: Bill Foulkes December 27, 2004, Revised May 10, 2005, Revised June 20, 2005 5• Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development Services 6• Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if a The project consists of three discrete phases. applicable): Phase 1- FHS allocated money and summer of 2005 on 60 parking stalls construction is expected to start in th from two s Area - 32 parking stalls constructed along the northern perimeter of the fic areas existing hospital. e� - 28 parking stalls existing hospital. constructed along the western perimeter of the Phase 2 -408 parking stalls constructed on the vacant lot west of th existing hospital. This combines Phases 2 and 3 as described in the initial SEPA Checklist. Phase 2 construction will like! e Of Phase 2 will be built to accommodate the likely occur in 2006 A portion future expansion to the hospital's intensive Parkingre unit. The created d by a Proposed ICU is unknown at this time, but construction ma g of the Phase 2 also includes construction of a stor►'nwater Y begin in 2007 tax parcel 75D457-010� a vacant lot pond an King County construction parking immediate) currently used for temporary site. Y west of the Lakehaven Utility District well The project phasing is shown on the preliminary drawings submitted with the Master Land Use Permit (MLUP) application and h Provides a clear EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY outline of the three discrete project elements. The phasing plan included with the initial submittal is no longer applicable. The Master Land Use Permit (MLUP) and this checklist are not intended to discuss impacts of the ICU project, but are limited to the parking improvements identified above! 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. See Response to item A.6 above. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. AJ Bredberg conducted a wetland delineation that Sheldon & Associates, Inc. reviewed. A December 2, 2004 memo prepared by Sheldon & Associates and included with the MLUP application represents the extent of information available to this project that we are aware of. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Construction will require a Land Surface Modification Permit from the City of Federal Way Public Works Department. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This proposal is limited to constructing three surface parking facilities on FHS- owned property. Areas 1 and 2 cited in the response to Item 6 above will be constructed within the existing hospital campus. In both cases, the parking will sit on land adjacent to the perimeter road that bounds the exterior of the hospital. The land is now used informally for parking or provides an un- landscaped buffer adjacent to neighboring parcels. Construction of these areas will include new pavement, curbing, rockery type walls and storm drainage improvements for water quality enhancement. Area 3 will cover most of the 4.5 acre parcel it occupies outside of the existing hospital campus. The existing site is a mix of shrubs and second growth timber. The proposed construction includes landscaping, paving, curbing, retaining walls, rockeries and storm drainage detention and water quality features. REVISED CHECKLIST MAY to, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Area 3 will also require construction of a storm water pond to provide water quality enhancement and flow control. The pond will be situated on the 22, 000 square foot parcel immediately west of the Zakehaven Utility District well site (King County tax parcel 750451-0100). The pond footprint will occupy nearly the entire lot as permitted within the allowed setbacks. The improvements contemplated for Areas 1 and 2 will not significantly impact the environment, alter land use or appreciably change the site conditions. For that reason, the descriptions of the site and project impacts within this checklist are largely confined to Area 3 unless other noteworthy impacts are identified within Areas 1 and 2. The third component of the project is amending the exiting Binding Site Plan (BSP) survey to incorporate the 4.5-acre tax parcel referenced above into the existing hospital campus. This action will represent the third amendment to the original BSP, expand the hospital campus to include the proposed hospital use outside the current campus boundary, and establish the use of the expansion area. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. St. Francis Hospital's physical address is 34515 Ninth Avenue South in Federal Way. The property has two driveways on Ninth Avenue immediately south of the bulk mailing facility operated by the US Postal Service. The south side of the site can be accessed from 6`i' Avenue. 13. Assessor Parcel Number 202104-9038, 750451-0020, 0030, 0040, 0060, 0070, 0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110. REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Site sits on a vacant parcel that generally slopes from north to south. The site topography is very uneven with minor variations in grade and slope. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Steepest natural slope is approximately 12%. Man-made cut slopes around the perimeter reach 2H:IV. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Everett and Alderwood soil complexes predominate. Both are sandy loams. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximate excavation volume is 7100 cubic yards and approximate embankment volume is 4700 cubic yards. The excess material will be exported from the project area to a site determined by the construction contractor. Similarly, construction fill (e.g., gravel road base) will be imported from a site determined by the construction contractor. In addition, the detention pond will require 2000 cubic feet of excavation and 100 cubic yards of embankment. It is assumed that the embankment will be constructed of the excavated material and the remaining cut will be hauled from the site with the excess material from the parking area. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, site grading will require stripping vegetation from existing soil and exposing bare ground. The soil type and relatively moderate slopes suggest the risk of erosion is relatively low. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or building)? Area 3 will be approximately 81 % impervious. REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The construction permit will require an erosion control plan depicting best management practices and other precautions to reduce the risk of erosion ono' minimize the negative impacts of sedimentation, In addition, the project size will likely require the pepa►tment of Ecology issue a Construction Stormwater Permit Both elements of the erosion control strategy will be developed and implemented during the final project design. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Construction activity will likely produce dust and exhaust levels typical of site construction. These impacts are temporary. Long-term impacts will be limited to vehicle exhaust. It should be noted that the proposed parking will not appreciably increase the volume of traffic and resulting exhaust levels. The proposal does not include a facility that will increase trip generation (e.g_, new building construction). Instead, vehicle trips will be redirected from current parking areas to the proposed parking areas. This condition does not apply to the intensive care unit excluded from this checklist. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. WATER a. Surface 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. West Hylebos Creek runs exits a culvert on the south side of South 348`h Street approximately 1000 feet from the southeast corner of Proposed parking Area 3. Approximately 400 feet southwest of Area C is the wetland identified in the response to item A.8 above. Both areas EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY are hydraulicly connected to the extensive Hylebos wetland complex south of 348�h Street. 2) Will the project require any work over, in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not Applicable. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No diversions or withdrawals. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Project involves no planned waste discharge to groundwater. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): REVISED CHECKLIST MAN' 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Rainfall will produce runoff from the proposed pavement and sidewalk, the proposed landscape areas, and the existing retained vegetation. A preliminary Technical Information report (TIR) included with the MLUP application outlines the exiting drainage system and improvements considered with this proposal. Refer to that document for specific flow rates and quantities. Generally, runoff from both Areas 1 and 2 enters the existing storm sewer constructed with the hospital. This runoff empties into the regional detention facility Federal Way operates at the northwest corner of the intersection of 3481" Street and 9th Avenue. The proposed improvements to Areas 1 and 2 will not alter this runoff pattern or change the quantity of runoff. Area 3 runoff flows to the south as sheet flow or shallow concentrated flow. No obvious channel conveys runoff from the site. When developed, runoff will be collected before discharging into the existing storm sewer at the southeast corner of Tax Parcel 75041-0100 behind the well site property operated by Lakehaven Utility District. The revised checklist includes is resubmitted with a storm drainage narrative that discusses the design change incorporated in the updated plans. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Yes. Accidental spills or illicit dumping of material could enter the storm sewer system and be conveyed to receiving waters. This proposal doe not, however, increase the risk of such occurrences. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The TIR provides specific information as to how this project will address development impacts to storm water runoff. Areas 1 and 2 will include filters designed to remove pollutants from runoff and enhance storm water quality. Area 3 is within an area of Federal Way requiring basic flow control and enhanced water quality treatment of storm runoff. The proposed pond on Tax Parcel 75041-0100 fulfills the flow control (detention) requirement and provides approximately 40,100 cubic feet of live storage. The pond also includes a dead storage component that provides approximately 17,000 cubic feet of storage and fulfils the basic water quality treatment requirements. When coupled with a StormFilter, the facility provides the enhanced treatment required in the Hylebos watershed. All facilities will be designed as part of the construction drawings and conform to Federal REVISE© CHECKLIST MAY 10. 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Way's requirements including the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation Areas 1 and 2 are unmaintained and largely covered with invasive plant species such as himalayan blackberries and scot's broom. Area 3 is mature 2"d growth forest. The drawings submitted with the MLUP application include a site survey that identifies the size and species of all significant trees as defined by Federal Way. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Area 3 construction will require nearly all trees to be removed. The revised plans include a tree removal plan and tree index indicating the site clearing will remove 325 of the 378 significant trees, approximately 86%. The detention pond is not expected to require removing any significant trees; the site is mostly cleared except for vegetation retained at the perimeter. The large maple in the southeast corner of the site is not regulated as a significant tree but will be removed for the pond. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The preliminary vegetation plan identifies specific planting efforts considered for this project. This includes parking Areas 1 and 2 where removal and replacement of the invasive plants is proposed along the site REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY perimeter. To address the loss of more than 75% of the significant trees, proposed landscaping trees are upsized in lieu of planting replacement trees. Reference the revised landscaping plans for details. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrel fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Not Applicable. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None observed. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. This project requires no energy beyond electricity for the parking lot lighting within Area 3. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. EM c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary construction noise will occur primarily within Area 3. Permanent vehicle noise will also increase within Area 3 as hospital parking patterns adjust to the new parking facility. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The US Postal Service operates the bulk mail facility to the north. Across 9th Avenue east of the hospital is a mix of commercial and office buildings. The southerly boundary is bounded primarily by the regional detention facility along the eastern two-thirds of the site. Vacant property and smaller office and commercial spaces occupy the westerly third. The west side of hospital is vacant, wooded property owned by FHS. Immediately south of Area 3 is a residential neighborhood straddling 4th Place South. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Describe any structures on the site. No structures exist in the three proposed parking areas. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? yo e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? OP (Office Park) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Office Park. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The site is in a Wellhead Protection Zone 1 area due to its proximity to the Lakehaven Utility District wells. Federal Way regulates these areas per FWMC 22-1370. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None required — Property zoning and comp plan designation is consistent with the current use. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. REVISE❑ CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures considered, though retaining walls against the northwest corner of parking Area 3 will be up to 10-feet tall. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Wooded view of two residential at the north end of 4th Place will be removed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Buffer landscaping will provide some screening 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Areas 1 and 2 will rely on existing fixtures to light the parking areas. Area 3 will require new parking lot lighting for illumination. St. Francis Hospital has relied on shoe -box type light fixtures mounted on 30-foot posts. We anticipate similar installations within Area 3. Lights would be operated during parking hours. It is unknown at this time if this will involve 24-hour operation. Vehicle traffic will also produce headlight glare within the proposed parking facilities. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light will not be a safety hazard. Lighting could impact the residential neighborhood adjacent to Area 3. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: FHS will include a perimeter fence along the southerly boundary of Area 3 to minimize light pollution from reaching the adjacent residential properties. FHS is in the process of retaining an engineer to design the lighting to best minimize the impacts to neighbors. Proposed measures will include installing shielded or cut-off type fixtures to minimize light pollution onto adjacent properties. These fixtures reflect light at the source away from those areas where light in undesirable. Additionally, FHS is willing to use lower wattage fixtures and shorter poles adjacent to the residential area to further reduce the amount of potential light pollution. The final design will include an analysis that identifies the amount of light on the site and adjacent neighbors in footcandles. This will identify (1) the adequacy of the lighting within the parking area, and (2) the level of light reaching the neighboring property. The design of the lighting will be included in the project construction plans and reviewed under the Land Surface Modification Permit necessary for parking lot construction. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Playground at Panther Lake Elementary School and a King County Library branch on First Avenue west of project site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on - site plans, if any: South 348h Street is the principal arterial street near the hospital. Sixth Avenue South connects the western edge of the hospital to 348th Street. The hospital fronts Ninth Avenue South along the eastern boundary and accesses that street by two private drives. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, 348th and Ninth are both on Metro bus routes. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will provide a total of 468 parking spaces. Phase 1 will produce 60 new parking spaces and displace approximately 50 or 60 informal spots where people park adjacent to the existing access road. Phase 2 will provide the remaining 408 new parking stalls. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads are proposed. It should be noted that St. Francis Hospital and the City of Federal Way entered into a road agreement as part of the Ambulatory Services Building. That agreement calls for the eventual construction of a public street along the northerly boundary of the hospital between First Avenue and Ninth Avenue. Nothing considered in this checklist will trigger the road project outlined in that agreement. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. As noted, the proposed parking lot will not generate any new trips, but instead provide a convenient parking place for those vehicles involved in exiting trips. REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The remote nature of Area 3 may be attractive to car prowls and increase demand on police service. However, due to the frequent police and fire visits to the hospital during the normal course of operations, any increased demand is expected to be negligible. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural as water, refuse service telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. This project will not require any utility service. The project does include provisions to extend water and sewer services to the west. The intent is to provide service to the vacant property west of Area 3 and prevent disruption to the proposed parking improvements. The site utility plan (sheet C8 of the drawings submitted with the MLUP application) shows future installation of sewer and water mains. Both will be 8-inch diameter pipe. The timing of the installations will be triggered by future building service needs. At this stage no building(s) are proposed for the project site or the adjacent properties that would warrant installing either the sewer or water main at this time. REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10, 2005 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: _/� 0 S S12578 REVISED CHECKLIST MAY 10. 2005 , 4—b `4+1G-t1 LIGJJIJLLG.Ir� s;uawanojdufl BulMled le]ldsvH sloue�d 'lS L 1M0� I u '.'+I i33HS NOUVINHOANI l03f OHd Y..I N N N] a a &W W F� �o U < a I I wry w = Z Z a � N VI Z Z J 2 Z Qi Z Z �� " <� aE5 9.1 lj§ LH yigF o g ae gg S8� a 41k CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, I Ar,y.4- ';�"Q hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was Kmailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2005. Project Name �r anw i s �a' 1\ File Number(s) _ CL. -lb D/Aa- E� OS- oi��-UP, n_� 6� 13 --SQ Signature Date -7-.)1 --04�' K:\CD Administration Flles\Declaratlon of Dlstributlon.doc/Last printed 12/22/2004 3:19 PM CITY OF Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS File No. 05-100132-00-SE Related File Number: 05-100131-00-UP, 05-100133-00-SU Description: Proposal to construct improvements to existing parking areas, construct a new parking lot, and install related storm drainage facilities. The proposal consists of Phase I, which entails construction of up to 60 new parking stalls along the north and western portions of the subject site; and Phase II, which involves construction of a new 375 stall employee parking lot on a vacant site west of the hospital and the creation of a storm drainage facility on a vacant lot southwest of the hospital. Location: 34519 9t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Applicant: Toby Coenen, DOWL Engineers for Franciscan Health Systems Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.3IC. 110. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on August 10, 2005. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. You may appeal this determination to Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way (address below), no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 24, 2005, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Kathy McClung Title: Director, Department of Community Development Services Address: 33325 W11 Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Date Issued: ` July 27, 2005 Signature: OTC 05-100132 Doc. LD. 32517 ., , �,. ^. �• ^,� • —" " ° e sueId uolleollddy - liw19d ash pue� jalseW w'pi a a w aM CIIQIS�S 4l[eaH UEJSI3uW_q sjuawanadwl 5UIM ed le;ldg^y slouejd -IS 7M00 .:;+ 133HS NOIIVNH03N NOdd m61nb. U r T 7 ey z � �% S Qz N 11135 „¢j zUw R fi f •f� Y Y y f 0 Z OU Z a Z n Z w n ¢ y i t I iI7.�1•aj�;g �?P[� o z z z aw z z a� I I I I ! •.n =r z a z W z a z a z a z > w Z� 3 ¢ a W I, �� .. III w N I z o 1 f l• g m a R o w is `ag j f -�• �.� T• . • __ 5­AV H16 Adjacent Property Owner List City Project Numbers 05 100131 000 00 UP 05 100132 000 00 SE 05 100133 000 00 SU 2762300090 �K Brent J. & April E. Ost 34603 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300100 Vita►iy Y. & Larisa G. Yakubovskiy 34609 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300110 Ryan C. Manuel 34617 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300120 David P. Goodwin 34623 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300130 Gennadi Malamura 34701 4t Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300140 Adam G. Rice 34711 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300150 Michael S. & Connie Y. Rhodes 34717 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300160 Roy A. Hale 34723 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300080 Milo D. Kurle 34604 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300070 Lyle W. Whipple 34608 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 -1- 2762300060 Yoshihiko & Reiko Yamaguchi 34616 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300050 Adam G. Rice 34624 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300040 Jezabel H.Espino 34702 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300030 Jimmy C. & Wanda L. Turner 34708 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300020 Terrence Lee & Cynthia Gibson 34716 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300010 Michael D. & Elizabeth L Kennish 34722 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049049 2021049157 La Petite Academy, Inc. 508 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049071 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049050 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 7504510050 Medical Real Estate Services 34503 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 JAN 1 4 2005 -2- 9264700090 City of Federal Way 750 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049126 Lakehaven Utility District 34601 6th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049178 Jarstad Family, L.L.C. 34719 6th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800010 FWASC, LLC P.O. Box 890 Black Diamond, WA 98010-0890 9264800020 MTS Associates, LLC 616 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049132 720 South 348th Street LLC 710 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800070 Fedway Associates II LP 34520 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800060 Fedway Associates II LP 34400 91h Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98033 9264800050 Fed Watt' School District #210 34620 9 h Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800080 Bayview Inn Partners, LLC 34310 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049159 Ebel N. H. & Vance McNaul 1001 S 344th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 -3- - 6091s aasel slagpl ssaippy ®AU3AH QU OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 PUYALLUP TRIBE 1850 E ALEXANDER AVE TACOMA WA 98421-4105 JACK HOPKINS SEATTLE PI 101 ELLIOTT AVE W SEATTLE WA 98121 ERICA JAHN FEDERAL WAY MIRROR 1414 S 324TH STE B-210 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 CHRIS CARREL FRIENDS OF THE HYLEBOS PO BOX 24971 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE PLANNING DEPT 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 LISA PEMBERTON-BUTLER SEATTLE TIMES NORTH 1200 112TH AVE NE STE C145 BELLEVUE WA 98004-3748 SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL PO BOX 130 KENT WA 98035-0130 JULIE STOFEL WDFW REGION 4 OFFICE 16018 MILL CREEK BLVD MILL CREEK WA 98012 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 ATTN NEWSROOM TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE 1950 S STATE ST TACOMA WA 98405 LEE BEDARD FEDERAL WAY NEWS 133 SW 153RD ST BURIEN WA 98166 JOHN KIM KOREA POST 28815 PACIFIC HWY S STE 4B FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 @091s aoj aleldwal ash wlslaays peal 4100ws Y_' f i• r Fr MA DosREGION'I0 IVTH DIV 130 228T" ST SW BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 EPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC 1200 6T" AVE MD-126 SEATTLE WA 98101 5emd Cvt� �oNS US ARMY CORPS/ENGINEERS ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH PO BOX 3755 SEATTLE WA 98124 DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 PLANNING/OPERATIONS MANAGER JAMEY TAYLOR SNO-KING AREA DNR SEPA CENTER WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 47015 PO BOX 330310 MS 240 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7015 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 LHISTORIC CE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & PRESERVATION OX 483413 PIA WA 98504-8 43 ,JULIE STOFEL WDFW ' REGION 4 OFFICE MILL CREEK WA 98012 US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVCE 510 DESMOND DR SE #102 LACEY WA 98503 PORT OF TACOMA ENVIRONMENTAL DEPT PO BOX 1837 TACOMA WA 98401-1837 SHIRLEY MARROQUIN KC WASTEWATER TREATMENT MS KSC-NR-0505 201 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 MARK CARY LAND US SVC KCDDES 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055-1219 WA STATE DEPT WILDLIFE 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIA WA 98501-1091 TRAVIS NELSON WDFW PO BOX 73254 PUYALLUP WA 98373 DOH - DIV OF DRINKING WATER ENV DOCUMENTS REVIEWER PO BOX 47822 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7822 PORT OF SEATTLE PO BOX 1209 SEATTLE WA 98111 GARY KRI EDT KING COUNTY TRANSIT DIV ENV PLANNING MS KSC-TR-0431 201 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 SOUTH KING COUNTY REGIONAL WATER ASSOCIATION 27224 144T" AVE SE KENT WA 98042 JOE HENR NATURAL RESOURCES CVN SVC 935 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 WSDOT ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PO BOX 47331 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 WA NATURAL HERITAGE DNR PO BOX 47014 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7014 RANDY PEARSON WASH STATE PARKS PO BOX 42668 OLYMPIA WA 98504-2668 LARRY FISHER WDFW 600 CAPITOL WAY N OLYMPIAWA 98501-1091 PUGET SOUND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 110 UNION ST STE 500 SEATTLE WA 98101-2038 PSRC GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT 1011 WESTERN AVE #500 SEATTLE WA 98104-1040 PERRY WEINBERG SOUND TRANSIT 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-2826 KING COUNTY PARKS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PO BOX 3517 REDMOND WA 98073-3517 KC BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD ROD HANSEN SOLID WASTE DIV SEATTLE/KING COUNTY 810 THIRD AVE STE 608 KING CO DEPT OF NATURAL RES DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH SEATTLE WA 98104-1693 201 S JACKSON ST STE 701 1404 CENTRAL AVE S STE 101 SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 KENT WA 98032 KING CO ROADS DIVISION GERI WALKER LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST COUNTY ROADS ENGINEER FWSD TH PO BOX 4249 155 MONROE AVE NE 31405 18 AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 RENTON WA 98056 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FWFD FW CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL 31617 1 ST AVE S PO BOX 3440 PO BOX 1877 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 AUBURN WA 98071 COMCAST CABLE STORE MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE PUYALLUP INTERNATIONAL TH PLANNING DEPT 3600 PT OF TACOMA RD STE 110 AUBURN WA 98002 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2 ND AVE SE TACOMA WA 98424-1040 AUBUWJ PUYALLUP TRIBE PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS 1850 E ALEXANDER AVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER TATH TH COMA WA 98421-4105 2401 S 35 ST 2401 S 35 ST TACOMA WA 98409-7460 TACOMA WA 98409-7460 PIERCE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT PIERCE COUNTY BOUNDARY AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT 3629 S "D" ST REVIEW BOARD2401 915 FOURTH NE TH TACOMA WA 98409 TACOMA WA 98408 S ST AUBURN WA 98002 TAC PLANNING & CD DEPT CITY CLERK PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CITY OF AUBURN PACIFIC CITY HALL ALGONA CITY HALL 25 W MAIN ST 100 THIRD AVE SE 402 WARDE ST AUBURN WA 98001 PACIFIC WA 98047 ALGONA WA 98001-8505 KENT CITY HALL CITY OF TACOMA BLUS JOE ELTRICH PLANNING DEPT LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR TACOMA WATER DIVISION 220 4TH AVE S 747 MARKET ST STE 345 PO BOX 11007 KENT WA 98032 TACOMA WA 98402-3769 TACOMA WA 98411 NE TAC NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL MARION WEED CHAIR HAYES ALEXANDER PLNG CHAIR C/O JAMES COLBURN NORTHEAST TACOMA NORTHEAST TACOMA TACOMA ECONOMIC DEV NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL 747 MARKET ST RM 900 4735 NE 42ND ST 5308 RIDGE DR NE TACOMA WA 98402-3793 TACOMA WA 98422 TACOMA WA 98422 CRAIG GIBSON CITY OF LAKEWOOD CITY OF MILTON TACOMA PUBLIC UTILITIES 10510 GRAVELLY LK DR SW STE 206 1000 LAUREL ST PO BOX 11007 LAKEWOOD WA 98499-5013 MILTON WA 98354 TACOMA WA 98411 CITY OF SEATAC CITY OF DES MOINES CITY OF NORMANDY PARK 4800 S 188TH ST 21630 11TH AVE S 801 SW 174TH ST SEATAC WA 98188 DES MOINES WA 98198 NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 CITY OF BURIEN TERRY LUKENS CITY OF FIFE CITY HALL TH 5411 23RD ST E BELLEVUE COUNCIL OFFICE 415 SW 150 ST FIFE WA 98424 PO BOX 90012 BURIEN WA 98166-1957 BELLEVUE WA 98009-9012 WATER DISTRICT #54 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT 922 S 219T" ST PO BOX 3867 PO BOX 3487 DES MOINES WA 98198-6392 KENT WA 98032-0367 KENT WA 98032 WATER DISTRICT #111 COVINGTON WATER DISTRICT PAT PROUSE 27224 144T" AVE SE 18631 SE 300T" PL OWES TH KENT WA 98042-9058 KENT WA 98042-9208 S EAT 7 AVE RM 120E SEATTLE WA 98121 PAUL ALEXANDER MARY AUSBURN JILL GASTON REALTY SPEC METRO TRANSIT PSE BPA KSC-TR-0413 6905 S 228T" ST SKC-SVC 914 AVE "D" 201 S JACKSON ST KENT WA 98032 SNOHOMISH WA 98290 SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 WASH ENVIRON COUNCIL [FRIENDS HRIS CARREL TIM PAYNE 615 2"D AVE STE 380 OF THE HYLEBOS PIERCE COUNTY TRANSIT SEATTLE WA 98104-2245 O BOX 24971 PO BOX 99070 EDERAL WAY WA 98093 LAKEWOOD WA 98499 SAM PACE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS FW COMMUNITY COUNCIL SEA/KING TCO�PO BOX 4274 O ASSOC/REALTORS OF SOUTH KING COUNTY 29839 154 AVE SE 800 SW 152 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 KENT WA 98042-4557 SEATTLE WA 9816E MICHAEL FELDMAN ATTN NEWSROOM AVIATION PLANNING SEATAC WASH STATE OCD TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE PO BOX 68727 901 COLUMBIA ST SW 1950 S STATE ST SEATTLE WA 98168-0727 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8300 TACOMA WA 98405 JACK HOPKINS LISA PEMBERTON-BUTLER LEE BEDARD SEATTLE PI SEATTLE TIMES NORTH FEDERAL WAY NEWS 101 ELLIOTT AVE W 1200 112T" AVE NE STE C145 133 SW 153RD ST SEATTLE WA 98121 BELLEVUE WA 98004-3748 BURIEN WA 98166 ERICA JAHN SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL JOHN KIM FEDERAL WAY MIRROR KOREA POST 1414 S 324T" STE B-210 PO BOX 130 28815 PACIFIC HWY S STE 4B FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KENT WA 98035-0130 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KING COUNTY ASSESSORS KATHY REED CITY OF EDGEWOOD 500 4T" AVE RM 700 OLYMPIC PIPELINE CO 2221 MERIDIAN AVE E SEATTLE WA 98104 2319 LIND AVE SW EDGEWOOD WA 98371-1010 RENTON WA 98055 CRESTVIEW SHORECLUB ASSN 4817 SW 310TH FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 NORTH LAKE COMNTY CLUB 33228 38TH AVE S AUBURN WA 98001 STEEL LK RESIDENTS ASSN 2329 S 304TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BELLACARINO WOODS HOA 35204 6TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 TWIN LAKES HOA 3420 SW 320TH ST # 28 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 KEN SHATOCK GROUSE POINTE HOA 1911 SW CAMPUS DR # 621 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 COMCAST - SE PUGET SOUND AREA CONSTRUCTION/ENG MANAGER 4020 AUBURN WAY N AUBURN WA 98002 MHACC MIRROR LK RESIDENTS ASSN C/O WI THIAM HICKS 525 SW 312TH ST 29219 7 PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 WEST GREEN CONDO ASSN REDONDO COMMUNITY CLUB 432 S 321 ST PL PO BOX 5118 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 REDONDO WA 98054 BARCLAY PLACE HOA BELMOR PARK HOA 1034 SW 334TH 2101 S 324TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BELLRIDGE TOWNHOMES HOA CAMPUS GLEN HOA 1438 S 308TH LN 32806 6TH PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 MAR CHERI COMNTY CLUB BROOKLAKE COMNTY CENTER PO BOX 25281 726 S 356TH FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 KINGSGROVE HOA 2613 S 379TH FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Revised July 7, 2005 K:\Environmental Checklists\Agency Mailing List.doc CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Comments must be submitted by AugustAo, NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 2005. You may appeal this dsterminatiorolto DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFiCANCE Knthv MCClUr•g. of Con1r n,rnity De- ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL PARKING LOT v?lopmera SC Vi, Os, at the 1-`.i'y of Federal IMPROVEMENTS 'rVay �33325 Btl' Averut South. PO Box File No. 05-100132-00-SE -' 1 R, Ftdr: pal Way. 'v^,•;4 - ti083 :_ - i 'I, no lat- Fiel.ated File Number, �:,r. [hein 5 0-! F1.111- OF, August 27, 2p05. The 175-1C1'11 =1-al-Lip . L-15-10(11 -00_f Li ::c'sl rrluAt he !ri thY jurrn cf �. :when letter Description: F'Fop:;;11 is to curi5.r:1 .;I irrl_ Stating tilt reason for the appe rl of the de- provemcnt,. to a;.istil-9 �sirkjn[I ar'a-. ,url termination. You should be prepared to ,Welt a Tie;: parking Iat. aanci irlst..,ll relaf:Yl make specific factual objections. starrn dminaile facililles. The prcpo.-ai con- FWM# 931 ;sl - • I K�&_s 1.:,ninl entails :r,n iruction of Date of publication: r,ki to 7i nc.v {earl•-inC{ �:; llI ,, alu!iq file norfh and wes•r-ern portions of the subject site, and Phase 11, o. hich involves construction of a new 375 stall employee parking lot on a va- cant site west of the hospital and the creation f _;farm draiii_ijc far:i'il; ar. :j t•:rcant lot -:Ll`hNr �t Of Ilse in,t:pit�31. Applicant: Tiiby C•nr:.nerl• DOWL E-)gineers for Franciscan Health Systems Location: 34519 5th Avenue South, Federal s'da ' ;'A. Lear) Agency: Get,' ar �erieral '!;,••ry Depart- ment of Community ❑ eve lop rnent Scn;ces Staff Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Plan- nrr.253-835.2842 1 h ­ ''nL Ll _+•:,r n :y for Il it hens deter• r,in d thar it r 0ae nat have a prabnble sig- nifir. rt OcNersr». impacl on the environmerd. i-na;rormHntil ima.act statement (EIS) is no[ rrg1 ii,eJ L_nrleF RCW itl.:'1=•,i:is4S2)(C].. This dr-rvision was n'ede after retisdw of a :arlrnleted eriArnnrr;enta'--harl•)i.zt. Federal P!_lrl..'innl staff evatua- -r rl-1i= r;!_ri. ir1 oil-ier rnl)rricipal poli- 5 p'ar:.. rules. and rc�:ulation designat- Ed _a:_ _j substantive au- .lhniily under the Washington State Environ- menlal Policy Ac Rules aursuarlt to RCW d"..a 10.060. This infc.rDIP Tir r is a+;arlable to -hc p_JUi._ :lri rf::pi,ie�t. 111ia ❑N is isz�uad under 'Jv'AC; 197-11- 340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below- FEDERAL WAY AIMOR Your Community Newspaper - Affidavit of Publication Debbie Kaufman, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, ring County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-931 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 27th day of July. 2005 , and ending on the 27th day of July, 2005 . both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 92. 5 which amount has been paid -in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW b5.1 b.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 2nd_ day of August. 2005. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way ���i►i»��rrrrrrr►� .ti`��� Q►� -A 1• 4 i •► �M►•�.d+ PU8 LLC �f� a= i . ........ ,tip .,�r�ilrQF rU11A5►���.�`�. 1414 SO.324TH STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 0 253-925-5565 0 FAX: 253-925-5750 CITY OF Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS File No. 05-100132-00-SE Related File Number: 05-100131-00-UP, 05-100133-00-SU Description: Proposal to construct improvements to existing parking areas, construct a new parking lot, and install related storm drainage facilities. The proposal consists of Phase I, which entails construction of up to 60 new parking stalls along the north and western portions of the subject site; and Phase II, which involves construction of a new 375 stall employee parking lot on a vacant site west of the hospital and the creation of a storm drainage facility on a vacant lot southwest of the hospital. Location: 34519 9t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Applicant: Toby Coenen, DOWL Engineers for Franciscan Health Systems Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.110. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on August 10, 2005. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. You may appeal this determination to Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way (address below), no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 24, 2005, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Kathy McClung Title: Director, Department of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8 h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 /Le"Date Issued: ` July 27, 2005 _ Signature: ` 0- f/l 05-100132 Doc I D. 32517 sueld uoljeollddy - lluaaad asN pue-i ja}sLn 7 . nia7s Cs ualeaH ueastouez,3 sjuawanoadual Buis jed Ie3ldsoH slouead '1S U 1MO0 �� °� :';+ 133HS NOIiVINHO3Nl 1:)?' ''18 4 prt. Yyy s gS i n U U U U U U U U J J J J Ow b �^ 5 �� � . o p g .. i - • o � � N N � i. � � [ e N o O z z a a ¢ cwi u z z J z a a z ON J a in a z aw I?> 00 --`— z 111 l l f l i w ~ o m a "' z a 0 0 o a w? a f-" ��Naoy a N a = w III=f I 1 =�0=��=� y m a w v, F o � za i ,�'•` .. .._-�. 53NN3AV H16 Em i8 Ug q8 „GG o ai� g3: qa� tea: W B�g o�� iN6 Eb iEK p tl�`d dk�F�"S z 9 §Ws age J 9 gg £ g s ^ pgiqp�2< > d�>y>� Y N CITY OF Federal may DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cilyc)ffederalway.corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION! I, "?4ell J/ k, 691 'V'JA4 4 hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Ashington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice IT Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/orpposted to or at each of the attached addresses on l Z , 200 . Project Name S 7C�S �Pi �Gt.� �' TN'Iew1leo7nj File Number(s) Of- j00f 32 Signature ., Date % `z 7 0_3 KACD Administration FilesWeclarotlon of Dlstributlon.doc/Last printed 04/28/2005 12U5 PM Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall — 33325 8"' Avenue Federal Way Regional Library — 34200 1" Way South Federal Way 3206' Branch Library — 848 South 320"' Street mxp Fo c— IojA crx aF �� Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS File No. 05-100132-00-SE Related File Number: 05-100131-00-UP, 05-100133-00-SU Description: Proposal to construct improvements to existing parking areas, construct a new parking lot, and install related storm drainage facilities. The proposal consists of Phase I, which entails construction of up to 60 new parking stalls along the north and western portions of the subject site; and Phase II, which involves construction of a new 375 stall employee parking lot on a vacant site west of the hospital and the creation of a storm drainage facility on a vacant lot southwest of the hospital. Location: 34519 9'" Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Applicant: Toby Coenen, DOWL Engineers for Franciscan Health Systems Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.110. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on August 10, 2005. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the comment deadline. Any person aggrieved by the City's determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. You may appeal this determination to Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way (address below), no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 24, 2005, by a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Kathy McClung Title: Director, Department of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8t` Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Date Issued: Julv 27. 2005 Signature: (A/L L" 05-100132 Doc. I D. 32517 sueld uollBollddy - Jpjad ash pue-i aaisun ....... H aH� uxaasiS T[ aH USOstaULU-4 s3uauaanOadw] BulNied juj!dsOH Sp-yeid •IS U 1Moo .• N .°.-"4 133HS NOIIVVq OJNl • 0:- dib l ] � u n U a U U � y �s yv48af x"[ yg rM5 �yt + y q rp s � � N "K;11j _tytya4�a4i Yyygj3ji`§a:&py: a u�i z i z z gw Z a F F x W Ii m it g o a it a o U Z a _ a yyyy 8 9 RMaAV N19 i �g TAM PMCEI 97fi1T0-011fi Jf f 3R Z9 e� 5 3T d RCR gy O"N 0 8 b a pig a W 5Iya G 1.i3F8i u ppy``�W9L� $[e1+ U I m Y €� 0 63 �C l f WETLANDS (nP) 1 1 ,, ��_•, _ ��• auF�ER l S TAX PARCEL 202104-9156 n TAX PARCEL 202104-9038 I I I I I 1 276230-0090111 11 276230-0080 1276230-0100 27fi230-Q I �• 276230-0110 I 276230-0060 I 276230 -i1120 1 276230-0050 I UNITED POSTAL SERVICE TAX PARCEL 202104-9157 TAX PARCEL 202104-90771 1 TAX PARCEL 202104-905C -- TAX PARCEL 750451-0110 TAX PARCEL 750451-0020 TAX PARCEL 750451-0060 - I TAX PARCEL 750451-0030 I I 11 I. HOSPITAL II I s I _ 1'• TAX PARCEL 750451-0070 II l� II f H 1 kv 1 ' , i T+ SITE I I L PARCEL 104-9126 I 1 i. TAX PARCEL 750451-0050'. MOP � TAX PARCEL I __ 750451-0040 ' MOB I I ff TAX PARCEL 750451-0040 FAX PARCEL 750451-0090 DOMING PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD LAKE 6 REGIONAL DETENTION FACILITY TAX PARCEL 926470-0090 + I U) f w TAX PARCEL z 926480- 0015 W r OVERALL CAMPUS PLAN SCALE: 1 "=100' I -0040 276230-0 276230 PROPOSED ED I STORMWATER POND 273230-01401 27230-00301 TAX PARCE 202104-9096 276230-0150 = j 276230-0020 0 J a 276230-0160 276230-0010 i SOUTH 348TH STREET f TAX PARCEL 202104-9178 i TAX PARCEL 750451-0080! • I I I TAX PARCEL 926480-0010 TAX PARCEL r 926480-0020 r -i- ED N y O X v-0 O D I ;u o� ;m 0 TAX PARCEL 202104-9132 1% 14�10 �� CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS File No. 05-100132-00-SE Related File Number: 05-100131-00-UP, 05-100133-00-SU Description: Proposal is to construct improvements to existing parking areas, construct a new parking lot, and install related storm drainage facilities. The proposal consists of Phase I, which entails construction of up to 60 new parking stalls along the north and western portions of the subject site, and Phase H, which involves construction of a new 375 stall employee parking lot on a vacant site west of the hospital and the creation of a storm drainage facility on a vacant lot southwest of the hospital. Applicant: Toby Coenen, DOWL Engineers for Franciscan Health Systems Location: 34519 9'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services Staff Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by August 10, 2005. You may appeal this determination to Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way (33325 8`" Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718) no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 27, 2005. The appeal must be in the form of a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on July 27, 2005. Doc I D 32518 r 41k CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www. it tfederalwa .corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed )(e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on �1 2005.. ` Project Name File Number(s) WA Signature Date 7 � � K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 5/18/2005 3:03 PM N o. 'AFederal Way NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS File No. 05-100132-00-SE Related File Number: 05-100131-00-UP, 05-100133-00-SU Description: Proposal is to construct improvements to existing parking areas, construct a new parking lot, and install related storm drainage facilities. The proposal consists of Phase I, which entails construction of up to 60 new parking stalls along the north and western portions of the subject site, and Phase II, which involves construction of a new 375 stall employee parking lot on a vacant site west of the hospital and the creation of a storm drainage facility on a vacant lot southwest of the hospital. Applicant: Toby Coenen, DOWL Engineers for Franciscan Health Systems Location: 34519 9t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services Staff Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, final staff evaluation for this action, and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by August 10, 2005. You may appeal this determination to Kathy McClung, Director of Community Development Services, at the City of Federal Way (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718) no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 27, 2005. The appeal must be in the form of a written letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on July 27, 2005. Doc. I.D. 32518 Page 1 of 1 Tina Piety - Legal Notice From: Tina Piety To: admin@fedwaymirror.com; dgrigg@soundpublishing.com Date: 7/22/2005 4:55 PM Subject: Legal Notice Hello, Please publish the attached legal notice (St Francis DNS, 05-100132-00-SE) in Wednesday's (7/27/05) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you, Tina file:HC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Default\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00001.HTM 7/25/2005 Tina Pie - Re: Le al Notice _Page From: Teryl Heller <admin@fedwaymirror.com> To: "Tina Piety" <Tina.Piety@cityoffederalway.com> Date: 7/22/2005 5:11:53 PM Subject: Re: Legal Notice Thanks, Tina. Have a good weekend. On Jul 22, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Tina Piety wrote: 1�kCITY OF Federal March 18, 2005 Mr. Toby Coenen Dowl Engineering 8320 154th Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 y Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com L Re: Permit #05-100131-00-UP; COMMENT LETTERS FORWARDED St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements; 34515 9th Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Coenen: The City of Federal Way issued a notice of complete application for the Use Process III, SEPA, and Binding Site Plan amendment applications for the above referenced project on February 12, 2005. As part of the environmental and administrative processes, the notice of application was posted at the subject site and mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. To date, the City has received three comment letters on the above reference applications; copies of those letters are enclosed. The City will provide code -based responses to the various issues raised in the letters in approximately three weeks. In some circumstances, the comment letters request information that is best provided by the applicant. Any responses will be forwarded to the letter authors. I can be reached at 253-835-2642 should you have any questions about this letter or the project. Sincerely, Deb Barker Associate Planner Enc: Letter from April and Brent Ost Letter from Lyle Whipple Letter from Milo Kurle c: Kevin Peterson, Public Works Engineer Raid Tirhi, Traffic Engineer Mr. Bill Foulkes, Hammes Company, 1325 41h Avenue, Suite 1035, Seattle, WA 98101 Doc, LD. 30953 February 23, 2005 Director of Community Development Services 33530 1 st Way So. P. O. Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 To Whom It May Concern: 05 --1 16613�- UP C aybE'ELOPMT VE" B DEPARTMENT We are residents of 34603 4t" Place South in Federal Way. It has been brought to our attention that St. Francis Hospital is building a 300 space parking lot directly to the left of our property line, via a letter from the City. To say that we are not in agreement with this proposal would be a gross understatement. We have lived in our home for 12 years. First as renters, then given the opportunity to buy, we readily chose to do so simply because of it's park like setting and quiet solitude. Federal Way has become a very busy, fast paced city and we have considered other places to live but have remained in our home simply because at the end of a long day, we come home to the peace of our wooded cul de sac and that means everything to us. Having said this, we understand that there is very little we can do to prevent this development. It is our hope however, that you will try to understand the people whose lives will be affected by the proposed plan that the City has presented. Is there any reason good enough to destroy any more trees than absolutely necessary? They act as a wind block, give us privacy to enjoy our back yards and upper decks, and afford us their beauty all at the same time. It is our understanding that a 6 foot fence has been proposed. Certainly, with the way our home is set up, we would hope that a higher fence would be considered. Our entire living area is on the top floor of our home. When we are in our yards we want to be able to appreciate some semblance of the privacy that means so much to us. At the same time though, we feel concerned about safety issues. 300 parking stalls mean many more people very close to our home. Our worry is that we will no longer feel safe where we live. Again, leaving the trees and erecting a higher fence would be effective in reducing such risk. We are concerned that the additional lights from a parking lot will be intrusive. It is our strong desire that you would consider how they are positioned, so as not to shine directly into our homes. Additionally, the direction that the parking stalls face could impact us with the glare of headlights. We worry about drainage problems on our property that could arise from insufficient planning as well. Will we have to concern ourselves with flooding from storm drains? There is no rightful argument against St. Francis needing more parking spaces. I visited a sick relative today and trying to find a parking place at 8:00 AM was difficult. All we are asking is this. If you were coming to a beautiful hospital like St. Francis, would you rather see pavement and glaring lights, or would you rather drive into a lovely park like setting? Many hospitals and large office complexes are being built without ruining the integrity of natural settings. If you were a homeowner who finds their home a place of refuge and peace, would you want to maintain as much of that enjoyed privacy as possible or would you prefer to see the forest you love scalped, opening your lives up to the rest of the world? It becomes very apparent when personalized. It is our hope that you will consider the issues raised in this letter and any others from our fellow neighbors. We have all lived here many years and love our homes and the peace that they afford us. We .ask that you put yourselves in our position, as we have tried to be open to yours. Thank you for your time - Sincerely, a"'-�- Director of Community Development Services City of Federal Way 33325 8'h Ave., South P0Box 9718 Federal Way, Washington Cc: Deb Barker, Assoc. Planner 2-19-05 RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTME14 I FEB 2 6 2005 Received my copy of the "Notice of Land use Application, for Saint Francis Hospital parking lot expansion and improvement. This notice was no surprise, especially seeing the continual growth of this facility. I do have some questions, reservations and comments that I would like the city -planning department to address in regards to this new development During the previous hospital construction project, (2003) which included the new building and additional parking, the Construction Company utilized ground -compounding equipment. This compounding of the ground is an expedited process or fast track process to settle the ground so it is firm or solid enough to meet required standards to build on. This compounding technique affected my property and several of my neighbor's property. I had a few plates that fell off their display shelves, my computer went wacky for several days and I do believe my home received sufficient vibrations one day to cause a crack in the foundation. I had not seen this crack until that week of the compounding. This kind of activity can cause plumbing problems to older homes; the vibrations can loosen pipes and cause leaks. It was like living by a railroad for a week. I think the city needs to inform the Construction Company that they must limit this kind of compounding practice when they are next to a non-commercial neighborhood such as where I live. I do not think we should have to put up with that kind of disturbing and damaging activity. I made complaints to the construction company foremen, the City planners and the Hospital project manager. The hospital project manager told me the compounding would only go on for a day or so. Well it went on for a week. Someone in the City Planning department said the compounding issue was a county concern. Well the county told me it was a city issue. I guess neither the city nor the county has addressed this issue and it seems no one really wants to. I suspect this same construction company hired by the hospital will continue utilizing this system with this new development. I would like the city to give me a definite answer as to why there is no regulation or limitation as to what degree of vibration a property owner has to put up with. My second question is that the open space shown to be an additional parking area, directly behind my property is a concealed area. No matter how well lighted, it creates a safety concern for myself and several of my neighbors. This should be a concern of the hospital its patience and staff as well. Could this portion be closed off at night and opened in the mornings for use? Just a thought. It is a secluded area. This lot will be directly behind our properties and makes access to our properties very tempting and an easy avenue of approach. We would like to be assured that the continuation of a fence that is already been partially erected by the hospital be continued on, that would tie into the Day Care Centers Fence. We would like to see this portion of fencing be somewhat higher and sturdier then the one already established behind part of my property. Even though this particular portion of parking lot may not be utilized much at night we will still hear the sounds of cars driving through, sweepers, etc. So the fence and trees will help in limiting automobile lights, sounds, etc., although unfortunately for us, not sufficient enough. The fence and shrubs, trees anything that can be added. Will be appreciated by all of us. Another concern we have as neighbors is will there be an official or designated street going through these parking lots. Will speed bumps, etc.; be applied to keep speeders from traveling through the lots, especially at night. If most of the trees will be taken down to the North of our properties, regardless of any greenbelt or buffer zones, will this require we as neighbors to remove our trees? A few trees standing alone does create some safety concerns by all of us. The present wooded area to the North has blocked a lot of wind, when this is gone that could possibly cause some problems for us A consideration we need to address. Another concern is all these parking spaces means more lights, noise, etc., what can the hospital or the city require of the hospital that will limit some of these concerns we have as neighbors. We are not protesting or questioning the Hospitals Expansion or necessity for more parking space but we are asking for some considerations, respect and understanding as to our concerns as neighbors. We are losing our privacy and being quashed by commercial activity all around our street (304 ) we are just grasping for air and consideration. I do not think this will improve my property value, quite the contrary so I do have reservations toward this expansion project. We are the ones who must put up with the noise, dust and the rumbles of construction and there is no compensation for us at the end. It is called progress I guess, at times it can be pure frustration ViLIT 1 f. Way, Washington 98003 253-927-3056 RECIVED BY 400MMUNITYDE ELPME TT DEPARTMENT FEB 2 8 Z005 February 28, 2005 Deb Barker. Associate Planner Department of Development City of Federal Way 34515 9tn Avenue South Federal Way, WA This letter is to request that in the Federal Way Planning Departments review of the project request of the hospital, a reasonable mitigation plan will be developed which shows some respect for the affected residential neighborhood [which was here prior to the construction of the hospital]. My concern about this project proposal is that there are circumstances regarding the physical relationship between the hospital project area and the residential area which would suggest a judicious interpretation of the minimum requirements for project compliance with code minimums. Or to state it in other terms, the affected residential area should be afforded an appropriate consideration of the short and long-term impacts of the project on the hospital's neighbors. This parking lot will be a very bad neighbor for persons in the adjacent residential area. In contrast to the Outpatient Clinic parking lot, which is generally abandoned between six in the evening and eight in the morning and on weekends, this parking lot (Area A) will operate 24 hours per day through three shifts of the hospital work force. While the expansion of parking space will be partly oriented to meeting future demand, the primary purpose of the new lots will be to divert existing vehicles from current parking spaces to Areas A, B, and C. This project will re-route up to 207 vehicles per shift from the current lots to the new Area A lot. Most of this traffic will go through the outpatient lot, past my back yard and into [or out of] the new lot. The net traffic volume may not change for the hospital as a whole, but it will increase by three -times -two hundred seven in terms of traffic driving through the current lots and the new lot, increasing the incidence of headlights shining into the adjacent neighbor hood, the noise from vehicle motors, persons talking loudly, car alarms, and vehicle exhaust. A further factor relating to headlight glare and light pollution is the slope of Area A from north to south, with about a 25 foot drop in elevation. It has not been specified as to what the grade elevation of the completed project will be with respect to the street level at the south end of Area A. The residential neighborhood will definitely experience an increase in vehicle -related noise as a result of the 24-hour traffic in and around Area A. While buffers, fences or plants might mitigate parking lot and vehicle lights shining into the residential neighborhood, they will do nothing to mitigate noise pollution. Furthermore, any future use of the property north of Area A will magnify the problems discussed in this letter. Mitigation solutions for light glare and noise are related. It is obvious that a barrier of some sort is the only solution. The hospital's decision to leave a 40-foot buffer between Area A and the residential neighborhood is laudable, and it is consistent with the agreement reached when the hospital was originally built. There are three components to any barrier structure: the composition and height above parking grade of the structure; the location of the structure relative to the residential property lines and the perimeter parking stalls; and the use of an earthen berm to further elevate the fence and associated plantings. It should be noted that property security is also an important issue. Any fencing provided must be such that an intruder cannot simply kick in the slats of the fence and enter the property. This is especially a problem at the southeast corner of Area A where the parking lot grade is considerably higher than the grade of the property During construction of the outpatient parking area the hospital property grade was heightened by approximately four feet through the addition of fill dirt. Furthermore, the parking spaces in the southwest corner of Area A are quite remote from the hospital itself. I doubt that the current frequency of security patrols by the Federal Way police would provide security in Area A. An additional consideration is the glare and illumination from the light standards in the parking area. Current hospital lighting is atop tall standards with unbaffled lighting. The fixtures in the outpatient clinic parking lot illuminate most of my back yard. It is important to note that all of the houses in the affected neighborhood are split-level two-story structures, with bedrooms, dining rooms and kitchen areas on the top floor. Thus, six foot fences are completely ineffective in shielding these living spaces from headlights and parking lot illumination, and providing security against intruders coming from the parking lots. The building plan shows that the direction of vehicle traffic flow in Area A is north -to - south, and the alignment of half of the parking spaces is to the south and facing the residential properties. Thus half of the vehicles would be shining their headlights directly into the residential neighborhood. Our master bedroom is on the second floor on the north side of our house and would be strongly affected by vehicle headlights and glare from the parking lot lighting. Peripheral parking stalls on the south side of Area A face south and would be shining directly into the yards of houses on the north side of the residential neighborhood. Because Area A slopes from north to south, a fence would be mostly effective against the vehicles parking on the south boundaries of the parking lot, and less effective further up the north -south slope of the parking area. Only forty foot or taller trees would be effective in blocking or filtering these lights. It is urged that the cedar trees in the 40 foot buffer zone be retained for this purpose, supplemented by new evergreen plants to block headlight glare. Anything less would be ineffective against light pollution from the parking lot lighting. While I wish that this expansion project would simply go away, that isn't going to happen. The new parking lot and related construction will be built. Most of the native trees in what is called Area A will be removed and the acreage will be re -graded. My previous experience with agreements on the conditions of the project showed that changes were made after the agreement without my being able to negotiate or challenge the changes. For example, the project plans showed that the perimeter road around the hospital would not become a permanent avenue, and I was assured by the hospital project officer that this was the case, but this was changed and all traffic around the hospital now runs past the east side of my property. Also, the project plans showed screening plantings would be placed along the edge of the parking lot, but was not informed that the grade of the parking lot would be raised by four feet and that the four to five foot evergreen trees would be planted at the level of my back yard rather than the level of the parking lot, meaning that it would take three or four years before the trees were at the screening height specified in the project plans. And as indicated above, the lack of baffles on parking lot lighting fixtures illuminates my back yard as brightly as it does the parking lot. Therefore, I would like some assurance by the City of Federal Way that property owners in the adjacent residential area be informed of any request for changes to agreed on mitigation measures and that they would have an opportunity to comment on the impact proposed changes on the neighborhood, Sincerely, --LU 1. Milo Kurle 34604 4tn Place So Federal Way, Washington 98003 (253) 838-2297 CC: Bret Ost 34603 Ott' PI So Lyle Whipple 34608 4th PI So June 25, 2001 Director of Community Development Services 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 This letter is to register my concerns regarding the proposed expansion of St. Francis hospital, and specifically to your Notice of Land Use Application, with a "Date of Notice of Application" of June 13, 2001. I understand that this letter must be submitted by June 27, 2001 and that this is probably my only opportunity for input. I hadn't responded earlier because the included map of the site did not make it easily apparent where the boundaries of the developed hospital property would change. The abbreviated 4"' place south made it appear that the construction would be well north of my property. A visit Friday to look at maps at city hall changed that (by the way, your staff were very helpful). _ My comments are concerned primarily with mitigation measures, planned and not planned. I find it interesting that the mitigation measures (trees planted on the berm running along the south margin of the current hospital property) are being removed and will be replaced by parking spaces just as the trees finally grew tall enough to act as an effective visual screen. My reading of the maps shows that only the three westernmost of these trees will remain. Review of the maps and other material which I have seen causes me to conclude that my property and privacy will be severely impacted by the re-routing of traffic around the hospital, normal traffic in the parking lot adjacent to and behind my property, the removal of the berm and the older mitigation plantings, and the paucity of mitigation plantings on the east margin of my back yard. My reading of the maps, and a conversation with your contracted planner, Mr. Graves, leave me to conclude that no fencing is planned for the west side of the L-shaped lot. I have no fence separating my property from the proposed parking lot and perimeter road. Of our three properties abutting the development, the southernmost has a wood fence. Mr. Lyle Whipple, next door to me, has a see -through cyclone fence. Mr. Whipple and I will be the most impacted by the visual imposition of parking lot traffic and human activity. If the hospital does not provide wood fencing (as they did on the north border of my property), I will have to incur the expense and labor of erecting a wood fence in order to prevent persons entering my property from the parking lot. I would think that putting up a wood fence would be a minimal cost addition to the overall cost of the construction. It would also be a good neighborly gesture on the part of the hospital, and perhaps the only concession they would make to lessen the impact on a residential neighborhood that was there before the hospital was built. When the hospital was first Page 1 of 4 constructed, the lawyer hired by the sixteen households obtained a concession from the hospital to provide a 20 foot buffer of existing vegetation where the hospital property was adjacent to the residential properties. I don't know what happened to the honoring of that' agreement. It should be noted that the mitigation landscaping in the plans is directed only at the view of persons of normal height standing in the parking lot or the residential properties. The houses in this neighborhood have with only a few exceptions, backyard second story decks where we barbecue and relax from external stresses. Furthermore, these houses have dining rooms, kitchens and bedrooms or studies which have eastward facing windows. In my case, I seldom look out from the ground level rooms. We can easily set up our own ground level visual screens, but it is impossible to do so from the upstairs rooms. One further comment on traffic. The plans did not explicitly make any statements about traffic changes at the hospital. At present, there is a perimeter road around the hospital. Specifically to this issue, the road goes from the general parking lot along the south margin of the existing hospital property, and turns north along the west margin of the property. The road is used by automobiles and commercial trucks. My reading of the plan shows that this road is being eliminated as a definable roadway. The east -west portion of the road, near my property will be replaced by parking spaces. It appears that the road will continue northward from the northernmost parking spaces and continue on around the hospital. I imagine that this roadway will continue to be used by service vehicles and provide access to the cafeteria, etc. The problem I see is that the only outlet for this new perimeter road is through the parking lot behind my house. The northernmost of the new parking areas is a cul de sac, so vehicles will continue along the road to the second or third tier of parking spaces, fifteen feet behind my property, and exit onto 6'h Avenue. This brings hospital service traffic and the traffic of shortcutters past Mr. Whipple and my back yards. Unless the hospital adopts some measures to ensure that the parking lots not be used as a roadway for trucks and cars passing through, it will considerably increase the noise burden on the neighborhood. I suggest that the City of Federal Way take a closer look at the impact of traffic on the residential neighborhood_ My last point relates to the re -grading of the L-shaped lot in preparation of building the parking lots. I imagine that after all of the trees are cut down, some of the berm material will be distributed over the parking lot area to achieve a grade which blends in with the existing hospital property, and 6'' Avenue. The northeast corner of my property and the north west corner of the L-shaped lot is at a lower level than the surrounding areas. Prior to the installation of the berm during original hospital construction, this area had standing water after it rained. The berm has eliminated that problem. Consideration should be given to blending in the new elevation of the L-shaped lot with the low ground Page 2 of 4 in my backyard. In summary, I have strong reservations about the appropriateness of routing perimeter road traffic through the proposed parking area, and I feel the mitigation procedures found in the city code being applied here are inadequate for reasonably protecting a residential neighborhood and that special consideration be given for applying mitigation requirements to this particular case. Certain modifications in the initial height of screening plantings to protect the adjacent private homes would not involve unreasonable costs to the construction project. I have no recommendations on the problem of perimeter traffic. I appreciate the city's consideration of my comments and concerns. Respectfully, Milo and Karen Kurle 34604 4' Place South Federal Way, WA 98003s (253) 838-2297 milok@uswest.net CC: David Graves Greg Fewins Lyle Whipple Page 3 of 4 August 31, 2001 Director of Community Development Services 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 This letter is a follow up to my letter of June 25, 2001 (attached) in which I expressed my concerns regarding the then -pending application to build a parking lot on the property adjacent to my backyard property line. Apparently their proposal was approved (I did not receive any notification) because they cut down all of the trees on Monday and Tuesday of this week. They are now bulldozing and digging the water retention tanks which will lie under the parking lot. The purpose of this letter is to determine policies of the City of Federal Way regarding mitigation of the affect of commercial developments on the city's residential neighborhoods. As I mentioned in my earlier letter, I have concerns in three primary areas: • Compatibility of the grade in back yards of the affected residential properties with the grade of the parking lot (drainage issue) • Visual screening of the parking lot from the back yards of the three neighborhoods affected (public nuisance issue), and • The relationship of the parking lot and the traffic route around the hospital (public nuisance and safety issues). Compatibifty of the psade The boundary between my property and the hospital's property had originally been a low spot in which water collected every Spring, prior to the building of the hospital and their installation of the berm on the south margin of their property. The low area ran south along the backs of residential properties, toward 248'. This low area is still there. I have been informed by a person employed by the contractor involved in directing the construction that the parking lot grade will be the same as the grade in my back yard. However, I also have been informed by others that they plan to erect a retaining wall. Since the grade of the undisturbed property sloped from 6' avenue toward our properties, in the opposite direction of the slope appropriate for the parking lot, it seems that the re - grade of the parking lot will have to be reversed, with the elevation at the edge of my property being lower than the edge of the adjacent parking lot. I am concerned that since the residential properties are the terminal point from our properties and the wooded hospital property to the north, that any surface water will be directed onto the residential properties. Visual screening between the parking lot and residential neighborhood I discussed this issue at length in my June 25 letter. As I write this, I am looking out, across a black water retention barrier, at a large hole surrounded by mountains of dirt. Eventually, this scene will be replaced by asphalt. Preliminary drawings which I have seen show a fifteen foot border area which will be planted with shrubs and small trees. When the hospital was originally built, there was an agreement between the residents and the hospital to leave a 20 foot visual barrier between the neighborhood and the hospital. That agreement was compromised by a decision by the hospital to move their structure further south on their property. Instead, they erected an eight foot berm along the west and south margin of their property (to sixth avenue) and plant some small deciduous and evergreen trees on top of the berm. It took 20 years for this to grow into a moderately effective visual screen. Current construction for the parking lot caused the removal of this visual screen and the berm, in order to maintain a continuous grade in the parking lot. Now it appears that we are starting over again. Except this time small trees will be planted in a fifteen foot wide strip, without the benefit of being elevated by a berm. I expect that it will take twenty years or more for these trees to begin serving as a visual screen, if indeed they are not cut down for some emergent purpose benefitting the hospital before that time. My earlier letter asked whether the city had any requirements for visual screening, including wooden fencing, between properties such as the hospital's and residential neighborhoods. It seems inconceivable that city codes would not require some substantial separation between residential neighborhoods and commercial enterprises, especially something like public parking lots. I would like to see any updated plans the hospital has for the nature of this planted marginal strip and any plans for a wood fence, like the one which they erected between my property and the southern margin of their wooded undeveloped property. I would also appreciate your informing me who I should be contacting at St. Francis in order to discover their intentions. Routinp, of traffic through the parking lot and around the hospital buildin s. In my letter of June 25, I discussed at length my concerns with the elimination of the current roadway around the hospital and the apparent route which such traffic would take if the parking lot was structured according the drawings I reviewed in June. Those drawings showed parking spaces where the perimeter road is now, and a traffic path which would route sixth avenue traffic through the parking lot, along the 15 foot planted strip, and northward around the hospital. Currently this road is used by persons working at or visiting the hospital, and delivery trucks which are servicing the hospital. Have the plans for hospital perimeter traffic changed since June? I am uneasy about the danger of drivers of vehicles losing control as they drive toward or past the strip planted with small trees and bounded by a six or eight inch curb. There is nothing to prevent cars or trucks from crashing into the back yards of my or my neighbors. I am unclear about which issues might be the concern of the City of Federal way regarding conflicts between residential neighborhoods and commercial developments. I would appreciate clarification on this. So far I and my neighbors have no information regarding our rights and protections afforded us. I also do not know whether my previous letter was forwarded to St. Francis, as it was when we were dealing with the county. If this is not done routinely, please forward this to the hospital administration. Respectfully, Milo and Karen Kurle 34604 4`" Place South Federal Way, WA 98003 s (253) 838-2297 milok@uswest.net (Attachment: June 25, 2001 letter) CC: David Graves Greg Fewins Lyle Whipple Milo Kurle 34604 4`h pl so Federal Way, WA 980003 Director of Community Development Services 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 NMPPUCMTOW— Name: St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improve- ments, BSP Amendment Description: Land use and environmental ap- proval for phased construction of surface parking improvements at St. Francis Hosptaa[ Includingg amending the existing Binding Site Plan (BSP�. Total ",mbar of new parking stalls in Prase T is 1 0 with deletion of nine exising stalls, Phase 2 will add 298 stalls, and Phase 3 will add 138 stalls. Applicant: Toby Coenen, Dowl Engfneem Location: 34515 9th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: January. 11, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: February 12, 2005 Date Determined Complete: January 31, 2005 Comment Due Date: February 28, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Project Approval (File ►t05-100131-00-UP; 05- 100132-00-SE, Q5-io0133-oo-su) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter Is. "Environmental Protection;" Chapter 19, "Planning and Development;" Chapter 20, 'Subdivision; Chapter 21, "Surface Water Management;' and Chapter 22, 'Zoning.' Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The pro ect will be reviewed for consistency with all WIappplicable codes and regulations. Including the G; King County Surface Water Design Uanua€ and City amencirn en is; and the InternationaMnfform Building, Fire, and Mechanical Codes. The official project fife is available for public review at the City Hall Department of Community' Develop- ment Services (33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use ap- plicaton to the Director of Community Development Services by February 28, 2005. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or Specifically requests 'a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision, City Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 FWM-if846 Published Fgbruary 12, 2005. FEDERAL WAY I Your Community Newspaper - Affidavit of Publication Debbie Kaufman, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place .of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way L-846 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 12th day of February, 2005 , and ending on the 12th day of February, 2005 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 112.88 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 24th day of February, 2005. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way IIIt11lfl11rr : 7TA � N!'A'dl vOL1u a:'C7 W rrrfrllJG� I11 1 1414 SO. 324TH STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 0 253-925-5565 0 FAX: 253-925-5750 CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements, BSP Amendment Description: Land use and environmental approval for phased construction of surface parking improvements at St. Francis Hospital including amending the existing Binding Site Plan (BSP). Total number of new parking stalls in Phase 1 is 120 with deletion of nine existng stalls, Phase 2 will add 298 stalls, and Phase 3 will add 138 stalls. Applicant: Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineers Location: 34515 9t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: January 11, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: February 12, 2005 Date Determined Complete: January 31, 2005 Comment Due Date: February 28, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Project Approval (File #05-100131-00-UP; 05-100132-00-SE, 05-100133-00-SU) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes _ No Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: .Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection;" Chapter 19, "Planning and Development;" Chapter 20, "Subdivision;" Chapter 21, "Surface Water Management;" and Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual and City amendments; and the International/Uniform Building, Fire, and Mechanical Codes. The official project file is available for public review at the City Hall Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use; application to the Director of Community Development Services by February 28, 2005. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision. City Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on February 12, 2005. 05-I00131 Doc ID 30251 C%I! f 01 - FLULF ' AL WAY BUILDING D`vPT, 00WL St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements JKNOINNERE Master Land Use Permit Franciscan Health System SL PQci. HO.Pu'l 34515Nh&A�So,& F.".1 Wry. WA 9WO S12578 12-27-04 1 Vicinity N12EJ 164M AVO%JE NF FEDMOND, WA BMW (42w aGG-2= FAX (42P WGWN CITY OFF''`' Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalwcy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other was PQ mailed ❑ faxed 2005. Project Name File Number(s) Signature ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on r n [w, L rs'- a - Date -'? - I) -0 S K:\CD Adminislroiion Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 12/22/2004 3:19 PM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements, BSP Amendment Description: Land use and environmental approval for phased construction of surface parking improvements at St. Francis Hospital including amending the existing Binding Site Plan (BSP). Total number of new parking stalls in Phase 1 is 120 with deletion of nine existng stalls, Phase 2 will add 298 stalls, and Phase 3 will add 138 stalls. Applicant: Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineers Location: 34515 9`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: January 11, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: February 12, 2005 Date Determined Complete: January 31, 2005 Comment Due Date: February 28, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Project Approval (File #05-100131-00-UP; 05-100132-00-SE, 05-100133-00-SU) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, `Environmental Protection;" Chapter 19, "Planning and Development;" Chapter 20, "Subdivision;" Chapter 21, "Surface Water Management;" and Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual and City amendments; and the International/Uniform Building, Fire, and Mechanical Codes. The official project file is available for public review at the City Hall Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use application to the Director of Community Development Services by February 28, 2005. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision. City Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on February 12, 2005. 05-100131 Doc. ID 30251 I 6 Franciscan Health System SL P-0d �-1 34511NhoA-8..& F.d.d Wy. WA 9WW 0 ["Ll"AL WAY BUILDING DEPT. ,ADOWL St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements a F4 0 INN OR R. Master Land Use Permit 'ok OlNslon of OOWL, L-LA-- — =9 I &GTH A%W" ND W- WDMO. WA W= Micinity Map TO, (429 a@D-WM "X' (4M BEG-WM S12578 12-27-04 1 Adjacent Property Owner List City Project Numbers 05 100131 000 00 UP 05 100132 000 00 SE 05 100133 000 00 SU 2762300090 Brent J. & April E. Ost 34603 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300100 Vitaliy Y. & Larisa G. Yakubovskiy 34609 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300110 Ryan C. Manuel 34617 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300120 David P. Goodwin 34623 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300130 Gennadi� Malamura 34701 4t Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300140 Adam G. Rice 34711 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300150 Michael S. & Connie Y. Rhodes 34717 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300160 Roy A. Hale 34723 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300080 Milo D. Kurle 34604 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300070 Lyle W. Whipple 34608 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 -1- 2762300060 Yoshihiko & Reiko Yamaguchi 34616 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300050 Adam G. Rice 34624 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300040 Jezabel H.Espino 34702 4" Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300030 Jimmy C. & Wanda L. Turner 34708 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300020 Terrence Lee & Cynthia Gibson 34716 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300010 Michael D. & Elizabeth L Kennish 34722 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049049 La Petite Academy, Inc. 508 S 3481h Street Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049157 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049071 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049050 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 7504510050 Medical Real Estate Services 34503 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 JAN 1 4 2005 -2- 9264700090 City of Federal Way 750 S 348" Street Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049126 Lakehaven Utility District 34601 6th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049178 Jarstad Family, L.L.C. 34719 6th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800010 FWASC, LLC P.O. Box 890 Black Diamond, WA 98010-0890 9264800020 MTS Associates, LLC 616 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049132 720 South 348th Street LLC 710 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800070 Fedway Associates II LP 34520 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800060 Fedway Associates II LP 34400 9"' Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98033 9264800050 Fed Way School District #210 34620 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800080 Bayview Inn Partners, LLC 34310 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049159 Ebel N. H. & Vance McNaul 1001 S 344th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 -3 - CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: LJ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed 2005. ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ❑ e-mailed and/or �"posted to or at each of the attached addresses on Project Name . r File Number(s) — � 001 Signature ] P LET l ✓'^ 112^n 1 -- Date 1 ao K:\CD Administration Fles\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 2/7/2005 5,07 PM Posted Locations 1. Federal Way Regional Library— 34200 1" Way South, Federal Way, WA 2. Federal Way 320th Branch Library — 848 South 320th Street, Federal Way, WA 3. Federal Way City Hall — 33325 8th Ave South, Federal Way, WA . 4. Three on Site — 34515 9th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA *See map for more details a. 9th Avenue South and North Driveway b. 9th Avenue South and South Driveway c. 6th Avenue South and entrance from South 348th Street PROJECT SITE Cn Q 4-j 0 W) 0 0 N O C, 3L '9 S 348th - ST Cf) S 336th ST 4�- V N �7 1 ( Y 0 FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT, ry OOWL d St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Franciscan Health System Ad N N W I N w 0 R w Master Land Use Permit CMIA.1— —r E�ICWVL_ L.L-C-- S12 578--F 12-27-04 f Vicinity Map SL V-- H-Pad 345151awhA—S-& SM 164TH AVENUE NF- REDMOM. WA SOW TEL: (4M aw-wm FAX (4M Fd.9 Wy. WA 9MM . IsCITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements, BSP Amendment Description: Land use and environmental approval for phased construction of surface parking improvements at St. Francis Hospital including amending the existing Binding Site Plan (BSP). Total number of new parking stalls in Phase 1 is 120 with deletion of nine existng stalls, Phase 2 will add 298 stalls, and Phase 3 will add 138 stalls. Applicant: Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineers Location: 34515 9th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: January 11, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: February 12, 2005 Date Determined Complete: January 31, 2005 Comment Due Date: February 28, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Project Approval (File #05-10013 1 -00-UP; 05-100132-00-SE, 05-100133-00-SU) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes No Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection;" Chapter 19, "Planning and Development;" Chapter 20, "Subdivision;" Chapter 21, "Surface Water Management;" and Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual and City amendments; and the International/Uniform Building, Fire, and Mechanical Codes. The official project file is available for public review at the City Hall Department of Community Development Services (33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use application to the Director of Community Development Services by February 28, 2005. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision. City Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on February 12, 2005. 05-100131 Doc. I.D. 30251 0 ,'i r OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING; DEPT, 71 +; ;.r.,; „"II"" O��L St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Franciscan Health System � ■ N o k ■ ■ R Master Land Use Permit ❑ .�. owls�or, or oowL. I-I-c sc R.ov HoW;m xs17M�A—S-6 (425) D-28M ` " AK(4 �W"° Ta= (425% ldP2d70 FAX (s27i WFi :V S12578 12-27-04 vicinity Map F duel W.Y. WA "om CIiV OF ti. Federal Way February 10, 2005 Mr. Toby Coenen Dowl Engineers 8320 154`' Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 �1FILE CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South • PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #05-100131-000-00-UP, 05-100132-SE, 05-100133-SU; COMPLETE APPLICATION St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Expansion and BSP Dear Mr. Coenen: On January 11, 2005, the City of Federal Way's Department of Community Development Services received your Process III Land Use application, environmental checklist, and Binding Site Plan application to construct three phases of surface parking improvements including establishing 436 parking stalls on a vacant parcel and the amendment of an existing binding site plan to include this vacant lot within the St. Francis complex. The site is zoned Office Park (OP). According to code regulations, upon receipt of an application the City has 28 days to determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-33 has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this letter as a Letter of Complete Application. Pursuant to the FWCC, the application is deemed complete as of January 31, 2005, based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set out in the Development Requirements and Binding Site Plan checklists. A 120-day time line for reviewing the SEPA, Process III, and Binding Site Plan proposals has started as of this date. The City has 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line can be stopped at any time that the City requests additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that additional information is needed as noted below. Having met the submittal requirements, your application is now ready for processing. Therefore, pursuant to the FWCC, a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror within 14 days and other public notice will be given based on City procedures. The Department of Community Development Services has responsibility to notify other agencies that may have jurisdiction over your development project or an interest in it. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED The following items were identified in reviewing the application for completeness. With this request for additional information, the 120-day maximum review time frame is suspended with 10 of the 120 days used, and it will be restarted within 14 days of the date of your complete response to this request. Mr. Coenen February 10, 2005 Page 2 SEPA Checklist Please revise the SEPA checklist to address the following comments: A.1 Add the amendment to the existing BSP. 13.3.c. l The first sentence does not make sense. Please delete one of the verbs. Are these different basins? B.4.b Provide information about numbers of significant trees removed and retained. 13.8.h Revise the checklist to state that the site is located in Wellhead Protection Zone 1, which meets the FWCC City definition of Critical Area. B.1 Ld The checklist indicates that a perimeter fence (six-foot tall) will minimize light pollution from 30- foot tall light poles from reaching the adjacent residential properties. List other methods proposed to mitigate light and glare from the proposed parking lot on the residential zone. PLANNING DEPARTMENT, Deb Barker, 253-835-2642 1. Site Plan • Depict the location of the fence at the south end of the Phase 2 parking lot as called out in the design guideline narrative. ■ Label the size of the proposed parking stalls and the drive aisles. A parking lot design criteria chart is enclosed. ■ Identify pedestrian routes of travel for Phase 1 parking stalls on page C4. • Pedestrian walkways depicted on Phase 2 and 3 (page C5) end abruptly at landscape islands. Provide a connection from the pedestrian path to the parking lot as depicted on the red -line page C5. ■ Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1634(d)(2), pedestrian walkways must be separated from abutting vehicular areas with landscaping. Also, the five-foot pedestrian walkway width must be maintained by use of curb stops, or increasing the walkway to seven feet to accommodate vehicle overhang per FWCC Section 22-1567(f). Revise the site plan to meet these standards. 2. Landscape Plan ■ Provide landscape plans that depict north and west parking lot improvements proposed under Phase I, including interior parking lot landscaping. ■ Revise the calculations for interior parking lot landscaping to eliminate perimeter landscaping. ■ Perimeter parking requires trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Depict trees in the west perimeter landscaping areas. ■ Type I landscaping depicted on the south side of the Phase 2 parking lot on the landscape plan, prepared by Design Two Four Two Six (undated), does not meet the intent of Solid Screen. Prior to issuance of construction permits for the Phase 2 parking lot, the landscape plan must be revised to provide a solid screen of vegetation as required under FWCC Section 22-1565(a)(1). ■ Significant Trees —A "Tree Count Report for 4.47 Acres" prepared by Ross Ensley, October 28, 1999, has been submitted with the Process III application. Trees in excess of 12 inches are also depicted on the Topographic Survey prepared by Dowl Engineers in August 2004. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(c)(2), a tree retention plan shall be provided with the first permit for development, and shall consist of the following: o A tree survey or cluster survey that identifies the location, size, number, and species of all significant trees. o A development plan identifying the significant trees that are proposed to be retained, removed, transplanted, or replaced including a final report on the percentage retained. Provide an analysis of the tree information depicted on the Topographic Survey and a 05-100131 Doc, ED. 30250 Mr. Coenen February 10, 2005 Page 3 development plan to meet the above FWCC standards for significant trees.' Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1568(b), a significant tree is defined as an evergreen or deciduous tree twelve inches in diameter measured four and one half feet above the ground; in good health; and not detrimental to the community, dead, diseased, etc. Red alder, cottonwood, big leaf maple, and poplar trees are not considered significant trees. ' 3. Wellhead Protection Zone The subject site is located in a wellhead protection zone, which is also known as a wellhead capture zone. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-1372(1), adopted on November 16, 2004, projects that are located within Wellhead Capture Zone I may only be permitted in a wellhead protection area if the applicant can show that the proposed activity will not cause contamination to enter the aquifer. In order for the City to review any potential impacts, please fill out and return the enclosed Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Critical Aquifer Recharge And Wellhead Protection Areas checklist. A copy of the code section and a handout on Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas is enclosed. 4. Other Provide a certificate for water availability from Lakehaven Utility District for future irrigation lines. TRAFFIC DIVISION, Raid Tirhi, 253-835-2744 Revise the Process III site plan to depict a 300-foot wide ingress/egress tract on the north end of the lot as detailed in the preapplication conference. This is accurately depicted on the BSP document. PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING, Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734 The site lies outside the City Center; therefore, the Flow Control and Water Quality Facilities must be designed `above ground'. However, the applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Department to locate these facilities below ground. The request must include justification (unusual topographic or site constraints) to allow for the underground facilities. 2. An additional cross-section, running the length of the flow control facility, is required on the plan. Binding Site Plan — 1. Add the City File Number to each sheet (05-10013j-SU). 2. Provide computer printouts for the new lot and tract lot closure calculations. In summary, applicant responses to technical comments for the Process III, SEPA, and BSP applications are necessary before additional project review can proceed. With this request for additional information, the 120-day maximum. review time frame is suspended with ten of the 120 days used, and it will be restarted within 14 days of the date of your complete response to this request. When resubmitting requested information, please provide four copies of any reports, and six copies of any plans or SEPA checklists, in addition to the green resubmittal form. 1 The 1999 Ensley report estimates the number of deciduous and evergreen trees six inches and above based on a 20% cruise of a 115 acre plot expanded by a factor of five. This report can be used if it only addresses current conditions. 05-100131 Doc. M 30250 Mr. Coenen February 10, 2005 Page 4 Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you should have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please feel free to call me at 253-835-2642. Sincerely, IOA 8�� Deb Barker Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Form Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas Checklist and Code Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Raid Tirhi, Senior Traffic Engineer 05-100131 Doc. I.D. 30250 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 5-2609 253- Fox ax Federal www.cityoffederalway.com� DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, r,n 1- hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: .Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed xe-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on VFL ) b . 2005. Project Name gS FileNumber(s) ��-l00�31- l�P_ 0�-16�13�-5�, 6s-loai33 sc� Signature Date D 5 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Disidbution.doc/Last printed 12/22/2004 3:19 PM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: St. Francis Hospital Parking Lot Improvements, BSP Amendment Description: Land use and environmental approval for phased construction of surface parking improvements at St. Francis Hospital including amending the existing Binding Site Plan (BSP). Total number of new parking stalls in Phase 1 is 120 with deletion of nine existng stalls, Phase 2 will add 298 stalls, and Phase 3 will add 138 stalls. Applicant: Toby Coenen, Dowl Engineers Location: 34515 9th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: January 11, 2005 Date of Notice of Application: February 12, 2005 Date Determined Complete: January 31, 2005 Comment Due Date: February 28, 2005 Permits Required by this Application: Project Approval (File #05-100131-00-UP; 05-100132-00-SE, 05-100133-00-SU) Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X Yes _ No Development Regulations to be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at this Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection;" Chapter 19, "Planning and Development;" Chapter 20, "Subdivision;" Chapter 21, "Surface Water Management;" and Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations, including the FWCC; King County Surface Water Design Manual and City amendments; and the International/Uniform Building, Fire, and Mechanical Codes. The official project file is available for public review at the City HaII Department of Community Development Services (33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). Any person may submit written comments on the land use application to the Director of Community Development Services by February 28, 2005. Only persons who submit written documents to the Director of Community Development Services, or specifically requests a copy of the original decision, may appeal the Director's decision. City Contact: Deb Barker, Associate Planner, 253-835-2642 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on February 12, 2005. 05-100131 Doc. ID- 30251 Page 1 of 1 Tamara Fix - Legal Notices =—I . :s . r': -:.S9..'.� .�FlS�i2'yf.,=.—.::1!'. From: Tamara Fix To: admin@fedwaymirror.com Date: 2/10/2005 11:22 AM Subject: Legal Notices CC: dgrigg@soundpublishing.com Please publish the following legal notices (Century Theatre MDNS #04-104326, and St Francis Parking Lot #05-100131) in Saturday's (Feb. 12, 2005) issue. Please furnish affidavits of publication. Thank you, Tamara Fix Administrative Assistant City of Federal Way PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 253-835-2602 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\default\Local%20Settings\Temp\GW}00002.HTM 2/10/2005 U 1 182 TH ST U49110 V r2 0 0 N M 0 z 19016 2U�'1049?:iI 9215-189 li 199 2921049058----__,_______----------__- ____----__ 2021949959 ♦ U26.18009bo I �2U21 U•i9U/? � � �''• S-3: 40969 I � �--- - !"5U•f51U1.10� _ � - I �.-.__� --- - I • / 2021049/59 2J2 I f5L1451U01U /504519050 / L — -300' — /SU451 UU20 i r �,� � 2021049038 /5U45?UU4U j ' li0SF31TAL-GFiU 92648000b0 �1 S_346T H PL _ I -- - - -- 2021 U4?156 90 �! I j �� 1[JZ1 U491 /3 2021, I50•fS1L►U8U i f �' /5U451UU/U / �f{i2:.iUL=L�� t / � 9264/00090 9264��U050 �' 2/623UUU , ry r� r� } I^ , \ \ , / r jI J 2154/00110 21 ,'62. 0CXl£, 0i 1049126 1 i i,1 f I t 0 Sl7 92fi4800U 1 U �A62 L<Uf1!. i 2154700100 r i 2I623GO040 I I' •f 9166 }� -00joi-- I2L11U , LT - Li 2021049049 � / 9264800029 �L a-' -0020 . 20210•191.32 926.189991E 1140•iUL►ODU 11 r 26210491/�• 42648U00•fU �!' 21541 � �¢Q (• _ 9264100110 21, —�` (` 2154/0001I ,.H,ST — 2021049014 U) 9062 2U2; a' S v f T- 2021049034 2021049081 RFC EIV D z ill 2021 U41 •9 STY OF FEDERAL AY kk BUILDINr' ---- Ir 202 NO SCALE 4- c a� aEi 0 ._ E Em 0a �j o a N JI N Q � o 4— 2 cu 00 U c IL N V) U) 20 N Adjacent Property Owner List City Project Numbers 05100131 000 00 UP 05 100132 000 00 SE 05100133 000 00 SU 2762300090 Brent J. & April E. Ost 34603 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300100 Vitaliy Y. & Larisa G. Yakubovskiy 34609 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300110 Ryan C. Manuel 34617 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300120 David P. Goodwin 34623 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300130 Gennadix Malamura 34701 4t Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300140 Adam G. Rice 34711 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300150 Michael S. & Connie Y. Rhodes 34717 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300160 Roy A. Hale 34723 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300080 Milo D. Kurle 34604 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300070 Lyle W. Whipple 34608 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 hc6urilvoTTED JAN `► 4 ���s05 -1- 2762300060 Yoshihiko & Reiko Yamaguchi 34616 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300050 Adam G. Rice 34624 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300040 Jezabel H.Espino 34702 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300030 Jimmy C. & Wanda L. Turner 34708 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300020 Terrence Lee & Cynthia Gibson 34716 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2762300010 Michael D. & Elizabeth L Kennish 34722 4th Place S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049049 La Petite Academy, Inc. 508 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049157 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049071 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049050 United States Post Office 34301 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 7504510050 Medical Real Estate Services 34503 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 JAN 14205 -2- f 9264700090 City of Federal Way 750 S 348" Street Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049126 Lakehaven Utility District 34601 6th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049178 Jarstad Family, L.L.C. 34719 6th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800010 FWASC, LLC P.O. Box 890 Black Diamond, WA 98010-0890 9264800020 MTS Associates, LLC 616 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049132 720 South 348th Street LLC 710 S 348th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800070 Fedway Associates I I LP 34520 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800060 Fedway Associates II LP 34400 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98033 9264800050 Fed War School District #210 34620 9 h Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 9264800080 Bayview Inn Partners, LLC 34310 9th Avenue S Federal Way, WA 98003 2021049159 Ebel N. H. & Vance McNaul 1001 S 344th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 -3- Sheldon & a Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE #204 a Seattle, WA 98105-4341 Ph 206-522-1214 9 Fax 206-522-3507 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 2, 2004 TO: Greg Fewins, Federal Way FROM: Suzanne Bagshaw CC: AJ Bredberg RE: Wetlands at the St. Francis Hospital Site REMARKS: Greg, met AJ Bredberg on the St. Francis Hospital site yesterday. We walked the site, dug holes in potential wetland areas, and checked the placement of many of AJ's flags. Although I did not inspect all of the flags, I agree with the placement of the majority that I did see. AJ and I agreed that the surveyors should survey the current flags. However, because it has been a relatively dry fall, the hydrology in some of the sections of the wetland was questionable. As a result, we agreed to inspect the wetland edges in February when the hydrology will be more obvious. A second site visit was not included in our current Scope of Work for this project. Because there will be sufficient remaining budget to cover most of the costs, a second site visit should only require a small addendum to the current budget. The wetland onsite is listed in the Federal Way inventory as 20-21-4-121. Based on my observations yesterday, the wetland meets Federal Way City Code criteria of a Category 2 Wetland [FWCC 22-1357 (a)(2)]. The wetland has two vegetative classes (Palustrine Forested and Palustrine Scrub -Shrub) and it is greater than 2,500 square feet in area. Culvert(s) under South 348th St. provide a hydrological connection between this wetland and the wetland complex located in West Hylebos Wetlands State Park (Federal Way inventory 20-21- 4-121). Category 2 Wetlands require a 100-foot buffer [FWCC 22-1357(b)(2)]. The onsite wetland appears to be smaller than depicted in the Federal Way Zoning and Wetland Atlas. Despite past agricultural uses, the buffer has not been permanently impacted. However there are sections of the buffer that are dominated by non-native invasive species (Himalayan and evergreen blackberries and Scot's broom). Buffer reduction and averaging may be allowed in these areas through Process III [FWCC 22- 1359(e)(2)]. Activities in areas where the buffer is not dominated by non-native invasive species are likely to require buffer modification approval by Process IV [FWCC 22-1359(f)]. Please let me know if you have any questions. From the Desk of... Suzanne Bagshaw Wetland Ecologist Sheldon & Associates, Inc 206/522-1214, ext. 15 Suzanne@bogstomper.com Wetland & Stream Analysis Permitting Restoration Design Environmental Education OFFICE:523-1380 1 ROSS W. ENSLEY Consulting Forester - Timber Cruising 3622 N.E. 1OOTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125 TREE COUNT REPORT - 4.47 ACRES LOT 1 KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 8508060815 OCTOBER 28, 1999 CRUISE CONDUCTED & REPORT PREPARED BY : TREE DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT (D.B.H.) ALL SPECIES PROJECTED FROM A 20% CRUISE - 4.47 ACRES D.B.H. 60 to 80 90 to 125 60 to 80 60 to 80 40 to 60 TOTAL YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR ' YEAR' DOUGLAS FIR DOUGLAS FIR HEMLOCK RED CEDAR ALDER 6 50 -- -- 5 -- 55 7 25 -- -- -- -- 25 8 20 __ __ 5 10 35 9 35 -- 5 10 5 55 10 10 -- -- -- -- 10 11 50 -- 5 25 -- 80 1.2 35 -- -- 20 -- 55 13 35 5 -- 5 45 14 30 5 5 -- -- 40 15 15 -- -- -- -- 15 16 15 -- -- 5 "' 20 17 30 -- -- 10 -- 40 18 15 -- -- 10 -- 25 19 5 5 -- 10 20 5 -- 5 5 15 21 10 -- --- -- -- 10 22 10 -- -- -- 10 23 5 -- -- -- -- 5 24 5 -- - -5 -- 10 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- 26 -- -- 27 5 5 28 -- 5 _ w- - 5 29 -- 5 -- -- -- 5 30 - -- -- -- -- -- 31 -- -- 5 -- -- 5 32 -- -- -- 5 -- 9 TOTALS 410 20 25 115 15 585 NOTE: There are 585 trees of all species 6" to 32 inch D.B.H. based on four 1/5 acre plots, which is a 20% cruise expanded by a factor of five. A factor of five indicates an estimated total of 585 trees. If a 100% tree count cruise were conducted, the above estimates could change. OFFICE:523-1380 ROSS W. ENSLEY Consulting Forester - Timber Cruising 3622 N.E. 1OOTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125 TIMBER VOLUME APPRAISAL & GRADE ESTIMATE REPORT LOT 1 - PORTION OF THE NE4 SW4 SECTION 20, T. 21 N., R. 4 E.W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 4.47 ACRES CRUISE CONDUCTED & REPORT PREPARED BY STATEMENT OF ASSLHPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature. Questions of liens, boundaries, overlaps or encumbrances, if any, have been disregarded. 2. It is assumed that legal rights -of -way are either in existence. or can be obtained. 3. The property lines and acreages were developed from the best available information. No legal land surveying was contemplated or conducted during the course of the cruise. Consequently, no responsibility or liability is assumed for the correct location or land area. 4. All information contained herein is believed to be correct but no guarantee or assumption of liability is intended. 5. Delivery of this report concludes the assignment. TIMBER VOLUME & GRADE ESTIMATE REPORT Date of Examination : October 26, 1999. Description Lot 1 - Portion of the NE4 SW4 of Section 20, T. 21 N. R. 4 E.W.M., King County Washington. King County Lot Line Adjustment No. 8508060815. Area : Approximately 4.47 acres. Accessibility Good access by a black top road to the South Line of the tract. Stumpage Value The estimated standing tree value to the timber owner is $37,251.00. Topography Flat. Boundaries Found the S.W. & S.E. approximate corners. It is estimated that a survey with flagged cutting boundaries would cost $1,000.00. Logging Conditions Good ground vehicle logging show. Road Building Good road building conditions. It is estimated that 200 feet of new road construction and a logging landing would cost $1,000.00. Species Douglas Fir, Western Red Cedar, Western Hemlock and Alder. Ace 40 to 125 years old. See the balance of the report for estimated ages by species. Site Good forest growing site 2 to 3. General Remarks A fair to good all age stand of conifers with a few scattered hardwoods found on a good growing and logging site. There has been some fire wood cutting over the past ten years. There are beetles in the Douglas Fir and some dead snags and blown down trees were noted. Most of the trees have survived the beetle attacks. We conducted a 20% (4-1/5 acre plots) cruise by 36 ft. logs for the export wood and 32 ft. logs for the domestic wood to a 5" top and 16 ft. log. It is estimated that there are 585 trees 6" D.B.H. and 'up for all species. D.B.H. is the outside tree diameter four feet six inches above the ground. It is estimated tha-t-Ahere are 410 - 60 to 80 year old Douglas Fir, 20 -190 to 125 year old Douglas Fir, 115 Red Cedar, 25 Hemlock and 15 Alder trees 6" D.B.H. and up. See the balance of the report for D.B.-H. sizes by species. Stumpage value.is the value the tree owner should realize after logging. TREE DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT(D.B.H.) ALL SPECIES PROJECTED FROM A 20% CRUISE - 4.47 ACRES D.B.H. 60 to 80 YEAR DOUGLAS FIR 90 to 125 YEAR DOUGLAS FIR 60 to 80 YEAR H MLOCK 60 to 80 YEAR RED CEDAR 40 to 60 YEAR' ALDER TOTAL 6 50 -- -- 5 -- 55 :-7 25 -- -- -- -- 25 8 20 -- --- 5 10 35 9 35 -- 5 10 5 55 10 10 -- -- -- -- 10 11 50 5 25 -- 80 12 35 -- -- 20 -- 55 13 35 5 -- 5 -- 45 14 30 5 5 -- -- 40 15 15 -- -- -- -- 15 16 15 -- -- 5 20 17 30 -- -- 10 -- 40 18 15 -- -- 10 -- 25 19 5 5 -- 10 20 5 -- 5 5 -- 15 21 10 -- -- -- -- 10 22 10 -- -- -- -- 10 23 5 -- -- -- -- 5 24 5 -- -- -5 -- 10 25 -- -- - -- 26 -- __ _ -- -- -- 27 5 --- -- -- -- 5 28 -- 5 -- - -- 5 29 -- 5 -- - -- 5 30 -- -- -- 31 -- -- 5 -- -- 5 32 -- -- -- 5 -- W 5 TOTALS 410 20 25 115 15 585 NOTE: There are 585 trees of all species 6" to 32 inch D.B.H. based on four 1/5 acre plots, which is a 20% cruise expanded by a factor of five. A factor of five indicates an estimated total of 585 trees. If a 100% tree count cruise were conducted, the above estimates could change. TOTAL TIMBER SUMMARY - 4.47 ACRES. SAWLOG - ALL SPECIES 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - M.B.F1 Sec i es Volume 60 to 80 Year Old Douglas Fir 58 60 to 80 Year Old Western Red Cedar 13 90 to 125 Year Old Douglas Fir 12 60 to 80 Year Old Western Hemlock 8 Sub -Total 91 Estimated Net Volume Per Acre (4 Timbered Acres) Is 22.8 M.B.F. HARDWOOD PULP 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - M.B.F. Species Volume Alder 1 Sub -Total 1 CONIFER UTILITY 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - M.B.F. Species Volume Douglas Fir 4 Western Red Cedar 1 Western Hemlock 1 Sub -Total 6 GRAND TOTAL 98 M.B.F. ESTIMATED GROSS VOLUME PER ACRE (4 TIMBERED ACRES) IS 24.5 M.B.F. Description 60 - 80 YEAR DOUGLAS FIR 2 Saw J Export 2 Saw C Export 2 Saw K Export 2 Saw Domestic 3 Saw J Export 3 Saw C Export 3 Saw K,Expoxt.. 3 Saw Domestic 4 Saw Domestic Merch. Cull Utility Cull Total STUMPAGE DETERMINATION SHEET - 4.47 ACRES ESTIMATED STUMPAGE VALUES ALL SPECIES Volume Est. Market Est. Logging Stumpage Total Estimated M. Bd. Ft. Value Per M Cost Per M Value Per M Stumpage Value 6 $750.00 $204.00 $546.00 $ 3,276.00 8 670.00 204.00 466.00 3.728.00 5 600.00 204.00 396.00 1,980.00 2 475.00 204.00 271.00 542.00 3 690.00 204.00 486.00 1,458.00 3 670.00 204.00 466.00 1,398.00 11 600.00 204.00 396.00 4,356.00 15 440.00 204.00 236.00 3,540.00 4 420.00 204.00 216.00 864.00 1 440.00 204.00 236.00 236.00 2 210.00 204.00 6.00 12.00 60 $21,390.00 Average 60 - 80 Year Douglas Fir Stumpage Value Is $356.50 Per M.B.F. 90 - 125 YEAR DOUGLAS FIR 2 Saw C Export 2 $670.00 $204.00 $466.00 $ 932.00 2 Saw K Export 1 600.00 204.00 396.00 396.00 2 Saw Domestic 4 475.00 204.00 271.00 1,084.00 3 Saw Domestic 4 440.00 204.00 236.00 944.00 Merch. Cull 1 440.00 204.00 236.00 236.00 Utility Cull 2 210.00 204.00 6.00 12.00 Total 14 33604.00 Average 90 - 125 Year Douglas Fir Stumpage Value Is $257.43 Per M.B.F. RED CEDAR 3 Saw Domestic 11 $1,100.00 $204.00 $896.00 $ 9,856.00 4 Saw Domestic 1 850.00 204.00 646.00 646.00 Merch. Cull 1 850.00 204.00 646.00 646.00 Utility Cull 1 210.00 204.00 6.00 6.00 Total 14 $11,154.00 Average Red Cedar.Stumpage Value Is $796.71 Per M.B.F. HEMLOCK 2 Saw K Export 2 $375.00 $204.00 $171.00 $ 342.00 2 Saw Domestic 2 350.00 204.00 146.00 292.00 3 Saw K Export 1 350.00 204.00 146.00 146.00 3 Saw Domestic 1 325.00 204.00 121.00 121.00 4 Saw Domestic 1 300.00 204.00 96.00 96.00 Merch. Cull 1 300.00 204.00 96.00 96.00 Utility Cull 1 210.00 204.00 6.00 6.00 Total 9 1,099.00 Average Hemlock Stumpage Value Is $122.11 Per M.B.F. (continued) Page 2. STUMPAGE DETERMINATION SHEET 4.47 ACRES ESTIMATED STUMPAGE VALUES ALL SPECIES Description Volume Est. Market Est. Logging Stumpage Total Estimated M. Bd. Ft. Value Per M Cost Per M Value Per M Stumpaqje Value_ AL DER Pulp-_ta 5" Top 1 $175.00 $171.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 Total 1 4.00 Average*Alder Stumpage Value Is $4:00 Per M.B.F. GRAND TOTALS 98M.B.F.------------- --- ---- - - - -.- $37,251,!00 TOTALHESTIMATED STANDING TREE (STUMPAGE) VALUE IS - - - - - - -- - - - - $37,251.00 ESTIMATED LOGGING COST TO THE PUGET SOUND AREA CONIFERS TO : EVERETT, TACOMA, OLYMPIA AREA Item Cost Per M.B.F. Fell & Buck $ 18.00 Yard & Load 65.00 Transportation 34.38 General Administration 7.50 Yield Tax (Est.) 35.00 Road & Landing Cost 10.20 Fire Protection & Prevention 5.00 Right of Way Fees 0.00 Surveying Cost 10.20 Profit To Logger (10%) 18.72 TOTAL _ -- --- - 2Q4.00 HARDWOODS TO : ARLINGTON, TACOMA AREA Item Cost Per M.B.F. Fell & Buck $ 18.00 Yard & Load 65.00 Transportation 34.38 General Administration 7.50 Yield Tax (Est.) 5.00 Road & Landing Cost 10.20 Fire Protection & Prevention 5.00 Right of Way Fees 0! 00 Surveying Cost 10.20 Profit To Logger (10%) 15.72 TOTAL $171.00 Road Cost: $1.000.00 =. 98 M.B.F. = $10.20 Per M.B.F. Surveying Cost : $$1,000.00 : 98 M.B.F. = $10.20 Per M.B.F. MAP TYPE CLASSIFICATION SHEET - 4.47 ACRES No. Description Acres 1. 100% stocking of 40 to 125 year old conifers and scattered 4.00 hardwoods. Average age is 70 years. The average gross volume per acre is 24.5 M.B.F. Some firewood thinning over the past 10 years. Most of the Douglas Fir -trees have survived a recent beetle attack. Volume varies from 20 to 30 M.B.F. per acre. Average volume per acre is 24.5 M.B.F. Site 2 to 3. 2. Open area cleared about 5 plus years ago. Site 3. There .47 is no economic volume or tree count on this area. THE FOLLOWING ARE VOLUME & GRADE ESTIMATES BY SPECIES VOLUME & GRADE ESTIMATES - 4.47 ACRES 60 to 80 YEAR OLD DOUGLAS FIR 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - 410 TREES Grade % Volume Volume - M.B.F. #2 Saw Export - J 10.0% 6 #2 Saw Export - C 13.3% 8 #2 Saw Export - K 8.3% 5 #2 Saw Dom. 3.3% 2 #3 Saw Export 8 - 11" Top - J 5.0% 3 #3 Saw Export - C 5.0% +. #3 Saw, ,Eport - K - 18,44% 1 #3 SaW'm. dm: #4 Saw � 6:7� 4 (Merch. Cull) 1/3 to 1/2 sound 1.7% 1 (Utility Cull) Less than 1/3 sound 3.3% 2 TOTAL. 100.0% 60 Average tree contains 146 bd. ft. and has fair to good form. Trees are all size, limby and have defects. Some stump rot, rot, sweep, spike knots, crook, large limbs and roughness. Average age is 70 years. The average tree will produce 2 to 2 1/2 - 36 ft. logs. Most of the trees show evidence of beetle attacks. 90 to 125 YEAR OLD DOUGLAS FIR 13" D.B.H. & UP TO A 10" TOP - 20 TREES Grade #2 Saw Export - C #2 Saw Export - K #2 Saw Dom. #3 S6w;iD6b.. (Merch. Cull) 1/3 to 1/2 sound (Utility Cull) Less than 1/3 sound % Volume Volume - M.B.F. 14.3% 2 7.1% 1 28.6% 4 28.6% 4 7.1% 1 14.3% 2 Average tree contains 700 bd. ft. and has fair form. Trees are all size, limby and defective. There is considerable stump rot, rot, spike knots, sweep, fluted butts, large limbs and roughness. Average age is 110 years. The average tree will produce 3 - 36 ft. logs.. Most of the trees show evidence of beetle attacks. VOLUME & GRADE ESTIMATES - 4.47 ACRES 60 to 80 YEAR OLD WESTERN RED CEDAR 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - 115 TREES Grade Volume Volume - M.B.F. #3 Saw Dom. 78.6% 11 #4 Saw Dom. 7.1% 1 (Merch. Cull) 1/3 to 1/2 sound 7.1% 1 (Utility Cull) Less than 1/3 sound 7.2% 1 TOTAL 100.0% 14 Average tree contains 122 bd. ft. and has fair to good form. Trees are all age, all size, limby and defective. Considerable stump rot, rot, large limbs, sweep, crook, woodpecker holes and roughnes. Average age is 70 years. The average tree will produce 1 - 32 ft. logs. Some of the trees show evidence of worms and ant attacks. 60 to 80 YEAR OLD WESTERN HEMLOCK 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - 25 TREES Grade Volume Volume - M.B.F. #2 Saw Export - K 22.2% 2'� #2 Saw Dom. 22.2% 2 #3 Saw Export - K 11.1% 1 #3 Saw Dom. 11.1% 1 #4 Saw Dom. 11.1% 1 (Merck. Cull) 1/3 to 1/2 sound 11.1% 1 (Utility Cull) Less than 1/3 sound 11.2% 1 TOTAL 100.0°, g Average tree contains 360 bd. ft. and has fair to good form. Trees are all age, all size, limby and have some defects. Some stump rot, rot, sweep, crook, large limbs and roughness. Average age is 70 years. The average tree will produce 2 to 3 - 32 ft. logs. 40 to 60 YEAR OLD ALDER 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - 15 TREES Grade % Volume Volume _ M.B.F. Pulp 5" Top & Up _ 100.0% 1 TOTAL 100.0% 1 Average tree contains 67 bd. ft. and has fair form. Trees are'small, fairly clean and generally free of defect. Some sweep, crook and rot. Average age is 50 years. The average tree will produce 1 - 32 ft. log. 14� V 6 C.) pi 44 f Irv, ..... • ..... 4t . - A m4. 4-�e. 17 -)$ r MLI�Affid-qw Zeff- - — ., - . I IL; , !, 7 -t -6 WA LPR Steve Pennington - FHS Jennifer Lowe & Rob McKenzie The Transpo Group St. Francis Parking Purpose R OFF\IF- JAN 1 1 Z005 =March 25, 2004. 04092.00 This memorandum is a summary of the parking analysis and conceptual parking layout plan created to assist in the planning of future parking considerations at St Francis Medical Center. Currently there are a variety of parking designations and restrictions throughout the parking facilities. The existing designations are based on the various types of facility users i.e. staff, visitors, physicians, etc. Existing Supply and Utilization Existing parking supply was derived from plans provided by Dowl engineering and on -site field observations. The parking designations observed on -site can be categorized into the following types: • Disabled • General Staff • Sleep Disorder Clinic Staff • Physician • Emergency Patient • Time Limited • General/Unrestricted • Unmarked/Informal Figure 1 illustrates the quantities and locations of these eight parking designations while table 1 summarizes the existing supply and the observed utilization at 2:30 pm on Thursday March 18`h, 2004. The Transpo Group 11730118"Avenue N.E., Suite 600 Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 425.821.3665 Fax: 425.825.8434 Table 1— Existine Parldne Supply and Observed Utilization Parking Designation/o Existing Supply Observed Utilization # Stalls Utilized Utilization ADA 34 27 79% General Staff 196 174 89% Sleep Disorder Clinic Staff 17 12 71 % Physician 23 21 91 % Emergency Patient 27 26 96% Time Limited 20 20 100% Unrestricted 448 425 95% Unmarked/ Informal 108 90 83% Total Parking 873 795 91% 771 Informal Parking At the time that this data was collected there were 90 vehicles parked in informal, unmarked parking areas. The bulk of this informal parking occurs as parallel parking along the two access driveways from 3`d Avenue South. If parking were not allowed in these informal areas it would have a drastic affect on overall parking demand. The current supply would not be able to support the demand. In fact, there would have been a deficit of approximately 30 parking stalls at the time that this utilization data was collected. ADA Parking For the most part, the locations of ADA designated stalls on -site occur in places that are appropriately located adjacent to building entrances as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). One area of potential concern however, is the location of the nine ADA stalls adjacent to the main entrance to the Radiation Oncology Center. Persons utilizing these stalls must enter the building through the Radiation Oncology Center entrance. This arrangement is inconvenient for the disabled visitors who have destinations within other areas of the hospital or who need to check in at the front desk. The arrangement also does not work well for operations of the Radiation Oncology Center. Patients of the Center typically have weakened immune systems as a result of their treatment. As a consequence, exposure to patients of other hospital services and their visitors can endanger the health of the Oncology Center patients. To provide disabled visitors with more convenient access to the main hospital entrance it may be necessary to expand the number of ADA stalls to include several of the stalls in the central parking lot just south of the main entrance drive. It is suggested that the utilization of the four existing parallel ADA stalls located outside The Transpo Group page 2 of the main entrance be monitored as a gauge to determine when and if providing additional ADA stalls is prudent. Parking Expansion Options Figures 2 through 4 illustrate potential parking layouts for the three areas of potential parking expansion. Area A is located to the west of the main hospital building, Area B is located at the southwest corner of the existing parking area, and Area C is south of the main hospital building and immediately east of 6`h Avenue South. Standards Nine foot wide stalls were assumed for all concepts shown here. Standards regarding aisle widths and other lot geometry were derived from Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) recommendations and are included as attachment A. Standards regarding buffers and landscape requirements are included in the Landscaping Requirements section of this memo. It is estimated that landscaping requirements will reduce the net totals by approximately 10%. Table 2 summarizes net totals and potential totals approximating landscaping impacts. Expanded Parking Area Concept 1 Concept 1 is a 90 degree, two-way layout for the three potential parking expansion areas and is shown in Figure 2. In this concept Area A would net approximately 207 new parking stalls and would be accessed via a new driveway tying in to the existing hospital access drive on the west side of the hospital. Area B would net approximately 32 new parking stalls and would be accessed by a new driveway connection to the existing parking area immediately north of the new lot. Area C would net approximately 107 new stalls and would be accessed by driveway connection directly from 6`h Avenue South. Expanded Parking Area Concept 2 As an alternative to the 90 degree stalls of concept 1, Concept 2 uses 60 degree angled parking stall and one-way circulation so that a comparison may be made regarding layout efficiency. As can be seen in Figure 3, this approach produced less net stalls than the layout approach of concept 1. Expanded Parking Area Concept 3 Concept 3 focuses only on Area C and differs from the previous concepts in that it realigns a large portion of the existing central parking area located immediately north of this area. Access to this area from Ch Avenue South remains, while the incorporation of this new lot with the existing lot to the north provides more seamless access to the hospitals other existing parking areas. This incorporated layout The Transpo Group page 3 for Area C nets approximately 195 new parking stalls which is approximately 90 stalls more than either of the previous concepts would yield. Concept Summary Table 2 summarizes the resulting parking supply based on these alternative layouts. Table 2 — Potential ParkinLr Additions by Area Conce t 1 Conce t 2 Conce t 3 A B C A B C C Stalls Created 207 35 107 197 33 102 296 Existing Stalls Removed 0 3 0 0 3 0 101 Net New Stalls 207 32 107 197 30 102 195 Potential Loss to Landscaping 21 3 11 20 3 10 20 Total Potential New Stalls 186 29 96 177 27 92 175 Formalizing Current "Street Parking" Figure 5 describes the three main informal parking areas that currently exist on -site. The area along the west access drive consists of 6 parallel stalls along the curved curb at the northwest boundary of the site and 32- 90 degree stalls on the west side of the access drive. The 90 degree stalls are arranged on a gravel area with abbreviated stripes on the pavement to indicate stall locations. Paving the gravel area and formally striping these stalls is recommended as a means of clarifying the role and availability of these stalls to users. Another informal parking area exists along the main entrance drive. This drive consists of two lanes that are each approximately 18 feet wide. Visitors are currently parking along the curb on each side of this drive. There is space for approximately 14 vehicles per side in the areas noted in Figure 5. "No Parking" signs should be installed to limit permitted parking to the section of the drive that is west of the MOB access drive and east of the drive aisle for the hospitals central parking area. Painted striping for stalls here are not necessary as parallel parking is often more efficient if left unmarked. The final informal parking area occurs along the emergency access drive on the north end of the property. Parallel parking currently occurs along the northern edge of this drive. There currently is no curb on this side of the roadway and vehicles typically pull on to the shoulder for parking. In order to maintain safe operations for emergency vehicles operating along this roadway, it is suggested that the northern should be paved and marked for proper parking in a way that provides adequate operating roadway widths for emergency vehicles. The western portion of this area could potentially be expanded to incorporate 90 degree parking adjacent to the The Transpo Group page 4 emergency room entrance. The topographic grade slopes severely upward to the north from the northern edge of the roadway. It is estimated that 6-10 net new parking stalls may be gained by converting to 90 degree parking in this area however, given the steep grade and the proximity to the emergency operations, it may not be desirable to allow vehicles to back out of stalls into the access drive. Landscaping Requirements In regards to landscaping requirements, the city of Federal Way's zoning code states that for buffers: - Type I landscaping 15 feet in width shall be provided along the perimeter of property abutting a residential zoning district. - Type III landscaping five feet in width shall be provided along all perimeter lot lines. And for internal lot lanscaping: - Twenty-two square feet (of landscaping) per parking stall when 50 or more parking stalls are being provided. The concepts included here follow the minimum buffer requirements, and in the case of Area A, an extended 40' buffer is utilized to provide adequate separation from the residential area located south of this area. Landscape islands included in these three concepts account for a portion of the minimum internal landscaping requirements however, it is likely that additional internal landscaping will need to be increased for the scenarios presented here. Creating this additional landscaping will result in approximately a 10% reduction in total parking count. Summary and Recommendations Based on the observed existing parking utilization and the amount of "informal" parking in use at St Francis, it is apparent that additional parking would benefit visitors of the hospital and related facilities. As a first step, formalizing the existing informal parking areas by paving, striping, and signing areas where this parking is occurring will help to define these areas for users and aid future parking planning by providing a more accurate account of existing parking stalls. Adding parking at one or all of the potential parking expansion areas analyzed here will also alleviate the current demand for parking observed on -site. Of the three areas analyzed for potential expansion of parking supply, Area C has the potential of adding the most spaces when done in concert with the re -striping of the area currently used for staff and general parking immediately to the north (see Figure 4). This layout has the potential of increasing the on -site supply by approximately 195 stalls. When combined with formalizing the current informal parking on the streets and perimeter drive, the total increase in supply would be approximately 300 stalls. This option, along with potentially converting some of the stalls closest to the hospitals main entrance to ADA stalls is our recommendation. The Transpo Group page 5 Table 3 summarizes the maximum amount of legal parking supply that is possible through the combination of expanded parking areas and formalizing on -street parking conditions.' Tahle 3 — Maximum Potential LeLyal Parkins Supply Existing Maximum Potential New Parking Maximum Potential Potential Net - Legal Supply Legal supply Increase to Existing_ Area A Area B Area C On -street 765 207 33 195 108 1,308 543 The maximum potential legal supply shown here represents an increase of approximately 58% more parking stalls. 1 Preliminary only- Landscape requirements not factored in. The Transpo Group page 6 Attachment A The parking stall standards used for the concepts shown here are Institute of Transportation Engineers JTE) "Large A" standards for 90 degree and 60 degree angled stalls. Parldng Stall Standards Standard 1 (90 degree) Standard 2 (60 degree) Standard Description Size Large Large A �VPW4 W? T W2 W4 AW VPI�I Class A Angle 90 degrees 60 degrees SW 9' 9' SL 17.50' 20.78' AW 1-Way)26' 18' AW 2-Way)__26' 26' WP 9' 10.39' VPw 1T50' 18' V i 17.50' 15.75' W1 1-Way)43.50' 36' W2 (1-Way)61' 53.99' W3 1-Way)61' 51.74' W4 (1-Way)61' 49.49' W1 2-Way)43.50' 44' W2 2-Wa 61' 61.99' W3 2-Way)61' 59.74' W4 (2-Way) 61' 57.49' The Transpo Group page 7 I wo Z 0 z o N n� 7 �y3p - 3 fnD i+ � MMM o w � GIs su a _ o k <o a r O c '8 w S �17 o� s x E g t� r1 40k CITY 40'::tS:P OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www. ci tyof federa lwa Crime Prevention Through Environmentg1F1VF[) Design (CPTED) Checklist JaN I Directions r '1Ty��G oPwWAY Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPM principles in your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by City Staff, and will be integrated into the Site Plan andCdr Building Permit review process. Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance 1.1 Blind Corners Conforms Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. Revise _NA Comments: Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should 19 be permeable (see through) including landscaping, fencing etc. ■ 13 Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around comers. e Other strategy used: l to COH2:f�n 1.2 Site and Building Layout —Conforms Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the Revise use to the street, and between uses NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Orient the main entrance towards the street or both stree For No ingle ❑ corners. ■ Family Development Position habitable rooms with windows at front dwelling. ■ Acce to dwellings or other above commercial Uetail develop t should not b. om the rear of the building. ■ of the �\ �( ❑ Offset windows, rways and balconies to allow for natural observation a pro Ling privacy. ■ ❑ L.oca main entrances❑exits . 1hC front of the sif and in view o e street. ■ For Commercial❑ Retail❑ Industrial If employee entrances must be separated 1 the main and Communi ❑ entrance, they should maximize opportunities natural Facilities surveillance from the street. 1 In industrial developments, administration ❑officesshoulk located at the front of the building. 0 Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses of For Surface ® parking are proposed, provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ Parking Structures Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. 0 CK Avoid hidden recesses. ■ Locate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. ■ Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situate For CommonLi locations that are easily observed by peopl ,plazas, Open Space coon areas, and playgrounds,; a placed in the front Areas of bui Shopping cer and other similar uses should face streets. �� 1 " O tegy used: Bulletin #022 —August 18, 2004 Page 2 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPT'ED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Common/Open Space Areas and Public On[Site Op Conforms Space —Revise Provide natural surveillance for common/open spac real. NA Comments: Position active uses or habitable rooms tth windows adjacent ❑ main common❑open space areas g. playgrounds, stivi ing pools, etc., and publi n-site open space. ■ Design and 1 to d ter enclosures in a manner which ❑ screens refuse c ers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. R Locate iting areas and ex entries to elevators ❑stairwells ❑ clos a areas of active uses to e them visible from the b ding entry. e Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy use 1. Entrances —Conforms � Provide entries that are clearly visible. Revise NA Comments: ❑ csign entrances to allow users to s into them before elite ' ■ Entrances shoul iearly identified (Signs must conform to ❑ FWCC Secti 2-1 D). Permit Exceptions. (Applicable during C r reale o occ nc Ins eCtian . ther strategy used: 1.5 Fencing Conforms Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the _Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and �NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: Bulletin #022 - August 18, 2004 Page 3 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy r Applicable during Site Plan Review 6 Applicable during Building Permit Review ��'�j ❑ Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g. pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. e Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ❑ open elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. e f If noise insulation is required, install double -glazing at the //� ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. e a Other strategy used: C 7 j 1.6 Landscaping Conforms Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and Revise allows intruders to hide. NA Comments: Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. ■ Tree ate/ r'1c CL) scso( Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and along pedestrian pathways. ■ ❑ Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. ■ Other strategy used: 1.7 Exterior Lighting Conforms Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. Revise (Refer to FWCC Section 22-1635(g)(1) for specific lighting NA requirements.) Comments: Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which ❑ addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a E. coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. 1 For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that lighting supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal - resistant. e Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access ❑egress routes, and signage is well lits In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on 19 pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and 19 mature form, as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light. e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e 13 Select and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. ■ Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people (retirement homes, congregate care facilities, senior and❑ or community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in public❑common arease Other strategy 1.8 Mix of Uses Conforms In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural Revise surveillance, while protecting privacy. NA Comments: Bulletin #022 —August 18, 2004 Page 5 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Where allowed by city code, locate shops and business n lower floors and residences on upper floors. In th' ay, residents can observe the businesses after h while the residences can be observed by the bus' ses during business re iiotms. 0 ��i ❑ Include food kid estaurants, etc. within parks and parking i structures. Nr strategy: used 0 Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors _Conforms When used and permitted by building and fire c security Revise bars, shutters, and doors should allow a ation of the street NA e consistent with the arehit al style of the building. Comments: Security bars an ty doors should be visually permeable �( (see-thro ther strategy used: Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification Conforms Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to —Revise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find NA the building. Identification signs must conform to FWCC, Comments: Section 22-1569(D). Permit Exceptions. ` ❑ Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. e Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 6 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review clearly In residential uses, each individual unit should bebuil numbered. In multiple building complexes, each 'gentry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed than entry. In addition, unit numbers should be provid on each level or oor. e ❑ Street nu rs should be de of durable materials, preferably reflective or I ' o •, d unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). e 1" t rovi cation fixed plaque For lar rolec s, maps p p ( ❑ fo and directional signage ublic entry points and along ternal public routes of travel. e Other strategy used: Evaluation for Agency Use Only Entrances Conforms Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. —Revise NA _ Comments: Entr should be easily r nia_able through design ❑ features an eation age. (Signs must conform to 1 FWCC Section 59(D). Permit Exceptions. ■ 11 ❑ Mi ' ze the number of entry 1 ' its. ■ Other strategy used: 2.3 Landscaping Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access. _Revise _NA Comments: ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e Other strategy used: too 2.4 Landscaping Location _Conforms Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a Revise building or to neighboring buildings. NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 7 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures, ❑ fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. 0 Other strategy used: 2.5 Security —Conforms Reduce opportunitiesfor unauthorized access Revise G�Of75f�`L9G/ r.G) ��%GQ S� NA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and ❑or humarmeasures $j to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable during Certificate o(OccyRancy Ins ection . Other strategy used: 2.6 Signage Conforms Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple Revise to understand [Signs must conform to FWCC Section 22- NA 1569(D). Permit Exceptions]. Comments: Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graphics for IN informational signs. A Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and For Surface/Al ❑ l/ drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators, and exits. e Parking Structures ❑ In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e A 1�'f ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where / V to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system. e ❑ Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. e Bulletin #022 —August 18, 2004 Page 8 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ,j ,//) ❑ Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is !� indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used: ZC a � Section 3.0 Ownership 3.1 Maintenance Conforms Create a "cared for" image Revise _NA Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWCC 8[ Section 22-1569, in order to give an impression of ownership, care, and security. (Ongoing). Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no /�`� ❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance. ■ Other strategy used: 3.2 Materials Conforms Use materials, which reduce the opportunityfor vandalism. Revise _NA Comments: Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious / glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel A A ❑ materials, anti -graffiti paints, and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. e Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWCC Section 22- 1564(u) regarding the use of vegetative screens. e Common area and ❑or street furniture shall be made 61ong AI�4 ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points, or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: 0 Bulletin #022 — August 18, 2004 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 12, 2005 TO: Will Appleton, PW Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Greg Brozek, Federal Way Fire Department FROM: Deb Barker FOR DRC MTG. ON. January 27, 2005 — Completeness review FILE NUMBER (s): 05-100131-00-UP, 05-100132-SE, 05-100133-SU RELATED FILE NOS.: 04-103609-PC PROTECT NAME: ST. FR.ANCIS HOSPITAL PARKING IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT ADDRESS: 34515 — 9 h Avenue South ZONING DISTRICT: OP PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Land use and environmental approval for phased construction of surface parking improvements at St. Francis Hospital including amending the existing BSP. Total number of new parking stalls in phase I is 120 with deletion of 9 exisitng stalls, phase 2 will add 298 stalls, and phase 3 will add 138 stalls. LAND USE PERMITS: Process III, SEPA, BSP PROJECT CONTACT: Toby Coenen Dowl Engineers 8320 154 h Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 869-2670 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Civil plan pages C1 through C6, SEPA checklist, BSP plans, narrative, Preliminary TIR, Geotechnical Engineering Report 4ik CITY 40'::tSp OF Federal Way APPLICATION NO(S) 1.1 2 DEFT, MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cilyofkdgmjway.com -oil op I o's wn Ik40U o Project Name St. Francis Hospital Parking Improvements Property Address/Location 34515 Ninth Avenue South Parcel Number(s) 202104-9038, 750451-0010, 0020, 0030, 0040, 0050, 0060, 0070, 0080, 0090, 0100 & 0110 Project Description Construct three phases of surface parking improvements at St. Francis Hospital including amending the existing Binding Site Plan survey. PI.F.A.CF PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation x Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director=s Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) x Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information OP Zoning Designation OP Comprehensive Plan Designation $15.000,000 Value of Existing Improvements $600000 _ Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Occupancy Type NIA Construction Type Applicant Name: Toby Coenen, DOWL Engineers Address: 8320 154th Avenue NE City/State: Redmond, WA Zip: 98052 Phone: 425-869-2670 Fax: 425-869-2679 Email: tcoenenC dowl.com Signature: ; � Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: Same as Applicant City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name: Steve Pennington, Franciscan Health System Address: 1717 South J Street City/State: Tacoma, WA Zip: 98405 Phone: 253-426-6635 Fax: 253-426-6075 Email: stempennington@Dchiwest. com Signature�2 Bulletin #003 —August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 kAHandouts\Master Land Use Application rip 10' 0' zc tary?�� y• I �� ar A9 2e 07 KING'GOUN GERTIFICATE ERU� King County`s�1'F:VirATER.AIIAILA3'ILITY Department of Development and Environmental Services Building Services Division 900 Oakesdale Avenue Southwest).� i Renton, Washington 98055-1219 ["�L �ji.1 Alternative formats available 206-296-6600 TTY 206-296-7217 J�iN 2 3 2005 - upon request �—t2 King County Certificate of Water Availability This certificate provides the Seattle King County Department of Public Health and the Department of Development and Environmental Services with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Do not write in this box number ❑ Building Permit ❑ Short Subdivision Applicant's name: Proposed use: Location: 3 `45X 2. OR ❑ b. 3. rip 8171013 ❑ Preliminary Plat or PUD )Ir- a other MLItP-lt7�e��' �`�' j � reJP,.,*L � PG, 5 - ,Ce7�>a&,A, I- rG. 2f)z ❑;h - Yd (attach map and legal description if necessary) M R - irveyor information: V- ttaa . WaterAW be providpd�by se ice connection only to an existing (size) water that is _ ✓ feet from the site. �P L o AJ �, �jy S v4D*,a y ,r Water service will require an improvement to the water system of- 0(i) feet of water main to reach the site; and/or ❑ (2) The construction of a distribution system on the site; and/or ❑ (3) Other (describe) The water system is in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan. The water system improvement is not in conformance with a County approved water comprehensive plan and will require a water comprehensive plan amendment. (This may cause a delay in issuance of a permit or approval). The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board gpproVal for extension of service outside the district or city, or is within the County approved service area of a private water purveyor. King County Comments ILrch Parcel Map and Data sasaa �` ��� • r r s`� to T '570 �,gw 0 ✓ 9157 7� 70 Ll 9SSQ al 2021.049038 O01O crr,..Do H.,,, RITAL:ACRD O71O 3A6r_Fi_RL_ 3_3dfai.Fi 3T g :f?[67 Fi _ L to M z a as °? i 9B2s W o` ❑ sa d v DOCK) S x- �+ S3 Of Pi i4 0720 S t W49 977F1 9t32 GOSs L(k1O Jw o160 S 34871i„ST 9OS7 7 tC] 2?72 cng.Caump. 0 281ft Parcel Number 2021049038 Address Zipcode Taxpayer SJHS INC The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and Is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable For any general, special, indirect, incidantal, or consequential damages Including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County.' King County_ I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. r C7 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 Order No.: 001153726 Your No.: ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL DOWL ENGINEERS 8320 - 154TH AVENUE NE REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052 ATTN: TOBY COENEN 1/1 ECEIVED PROPERTY ADDRESS: WASHINGTON ,JAN 1 12005 CITY OF FEDF-F3AL WAY BUILDING DEPT. Enclosed are your materials on the above transaction. If you have any questions regarding these materials, please contact us. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you. ««««««««««««««««««<»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» UNIT 10 - YOUR COMPLETE BUILDER/DEVELOPER SERVICE CENTER. WE HAVE EXPANDED TO SERVE ALL YOUR TITLE INSURANCE NEEDS RELATED TO LAND ACQUISITION, DEVELOPMENT FINANCING AND PROPERTY SUBDIVISION. MIKE HARRIS TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-5623 (E-MAIL: MICHAEL.HARRIS@CTT.COM) KEITH EISENBREY TITLE OFFICER (206) 628-8377 (E-MAIL: KEITH.EISENBREY@CTT.COM) STEVE KINSELLA CONDO COORDINATOR (206) 628-5614 (E-MAIL: STEVE.KINSELLA@CTT.COM) BOB BLOEDEL SENIOR TITLE EXAMINER FAX NUMBER: (206) 628-5657 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW ADDRESS ALERT: CHICAGO TITLE has moved its Seattle office from the 18th to the 34th floor of the Bank of America Tower. Effective January 20, 2004, our new address is: 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98104 Our phone and fax numbers are still the same, but please note that our e-mail addresses have changed, as shown above. TITLETURDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 PLAT CERTIFICATE Order No.: 1153726 Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat: In the matter of the plat submitted for our approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of K I NG County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said K I NG County, to -wit: VESTED IN: EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: $17.60 Records examined to JANUARY 3, 2005 at 8 : 00 AM By HARRISA ISENBREY Title Officer (206)628-5623 PLATCRTA/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 VESTED IN MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO LOT 1; AND FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER WITH FRANCISCAN HEALTH SERVICES NORTHWEST, FORMERLY FRANCISCAN HEALTH SERVICES OF WASHINGTON, FORMERLY ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SERVICES, AS TO A PORTION OF THE REMAINDER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY; AND FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS ST. JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER WITH ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, FORMERLY ST. FRANCIS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF FEDERAL WAY, AS TO THE REMAINDER. PLATCRAZ/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL A: LOTS 1 THROUGH 9, AND TRACTS "X" AND "Z", ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, A BINDING SITE PLAN - AMENDMENT NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 201 OF PLATS, PAGES 11 THROUGH 17, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID SUBDIVISION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 88°46'40" EAST 295.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 88°46'40" EAST 359.08 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION (SAID NORTHEAST CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 OF WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 97 OF PLATS, PAGES 78 THROUGH 82, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON); THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION SOUTH 01°14'49" WEST 659.58 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION NORTH 88'45'46" WEST 358.70 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION NORTH 01°12152" EAST 659.49 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PLATCRTL/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B Order No.: 1153726 This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). PLATCRTB/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 EXCEPTIONS A 1. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE PLAT OF WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 97 OF PLATS, PAGES 78 THROUGH 82, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. B AFFECTS: PORTIONS OF PARCEL A LYING WITHIN LOTS 2 AND 3 OF SAID PLAT. C 2. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8805020103. D AFFECTS: PORTIONS OF PARCEL A LYING WITHIN SAID SHORT PLAT- E 3. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS, NOTES, DEDICATIONS AND SETBACKS, IF ANY, SET FORTH IN OR DELINEATED ON THE PLAT OF ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, A BINDING SITE PLAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 160 OF PLATS, PAGES 44 THROUGH 48, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND AS CORRECTED BY AFFIDAVIT OF CORRECTION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9505221043, AND AS AMENDED BY ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, A BINDING SITE PLAN - AMENDMENT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 176 OF PLATS, PAGES 71 THROUGH 75, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND AS AMENDED BY ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, A BINDING SITE PLAN - AMENDMENT NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 201 OF PLATS, PAGES 11 THROUGH 17, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. F AFFECTS: PARCEL A. G 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURPOSE: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION LINE AREA AFFECTED: AS LOCATED, STAKED AND ESTABLISHED RECORDED: APRIL 8, 1952 RECORDING NUMBER: 4225404 H SAID EASEMENT IS DELINEATED ON THE FACE OF THE BINDING SITE PLAN AS A STRIP OF LAND 30 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS LOTS 4, 6, 7, AND 8, AND TRACTS "X" AND "Z". 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: INGRESS AND EGRESS A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS SAID PREMISES PLATCRTBI/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 JULY 18, 1955 4595827 J NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. K AFFECTS: LOTS 4, 6, AND 7, AND TRACTS "X" AND "Z L 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: WATER DISTRICT NO. 100 PURPOSE: INGRESS AND EGRESS AND FOR LAYING, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES, INCLUDING WATER PIPE LINES AREA AFFECTED: A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS SAID PREMISES RECORDED: AUGUST 21, 1962 RECORDING NUMBER: 5469405 M NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. N AFFECTS: LOTS 4, 6, AND 7, AND TRACTS "X" AND "Z" 0 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED: A STRIP OF LAND 20 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS SAID PREMISES RECORDED: JANUARY 21, 1965 RECORDING NUMBER: 5835105 P NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. Q AFFECTS: LOT 7 AND TRACT "X". R 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SERVICES, A NONPROFIT CORPORATION PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED: THE EAST 24 FEET OF SAID PREMISES AND PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 OTHER PROPERTY APRIL 9, 1985 8504090358 S NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. T AFFECTS: LOT 8 AND TRACT "X". U 9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS AND ACCESS AREA AFFECTED: A STRIP OF LAND NORTH 60 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS LOTS 5 AND 6, AND TRACT "Z" RECORDED: AUGUST 6, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8508060815 V NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. w 10. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS AND ACCESS AREA AFFECTED: A STRIP OF LAND NORTH 60 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS LOTS 5 AND 6, AND TRACT "Z" RECORDED: AUGUST 9, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8508090353 X NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. Y 11. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: A RIGHT OF WAY 10 FEET IN WIDTH AS CONSTRUCTED OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED RECORDED: MARCH 10, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8603100631 CONTAINS COVENANT PROHIBITING STRUCTURES OVER SAID EASEMENT OR OTHER ACTIVITIES WHICH MIGHT ENDANGER THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. Z AFFECTS: A PORTION OF PARCEL A. PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 AA 12. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS COMPANY PURPOSE: GAS PIPELINE AREA AFFECTED: 2.5 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF SAID GAS PIPELINE AS CONSTRUCTED RECORDED: MAY 23, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8605231053 AB AFFECTS: THAT PORTION OF PARCEL A LYING WITHIN LOTS 2 AND 3 OF WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS PARK. AC 13. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: A RIGHT OF WAY 10 FEET IN WIDTH AS CONSTRUCTED OR TO BE CONSTRUCTED RECORDED: JANUARY 9, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8701090715 CONTAINS COVENANT PROHIBITING STRUCTURES OVER SAID EASEMENT OR OTHER ACTIVITIES WHICH MIGHT ENDANGER THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. AD AFFECTS: THAT PORTION OF PARCEL LYING WITHIN LOT 3 OF WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS PARK. AE 14. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT PURPOSE: SEWER MAINS AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: JANUARY 23, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8701231444 AF NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. AG AFFECTS: LOTS 6, 7, 8, AND TRACT "X". PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 AH 15. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT PURPOSE: WATER FACILITIES AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: NOVEMBER 17, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8711170757 Al NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. AJ AFFECTS: LOTS 2, 3, 4, 5, AND 6. AK 16. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED: A STRIP OF LAND 30 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS SAID PREMISES RECORDED: JUNE 21, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: 8906211218 AL NOTE: SAID EASEMENT IS ALSO DELINEATED AND/OR DEDICATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT. AM SAID EASEMENT AMENDS AND SUPERSEDES THE EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8906070625. AN AFFECTS: LOTS 6, 7, AND TRACT "X" AO 17. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER PURPOSE: WATER FACILITIES AND ALL APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: AS CONSTRUCTED RECORDED: MARCH 11, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9303111559 AP SAID EASEMENT REPLACES EASEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8612041017. AQ AFFECTS: PORTIONS OF PARCEL A. AR 18. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 GRANTEE: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PURPOSE: WATER FACILITIES AND ALL APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH ACROSS AN EASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: FEBRUARY 11, 1998 RECORDING NUMBER: 9802110364 AS SAID EASEMENT WAS ALSO RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9902191067. AT 19. EASEMENT FOR PARKING OVER TRACTS A AND B OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 386052, AND FOR ROADWAY OVER PORTIONS OF PARCEL A AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED THEREIN, AS CREATED IN THAT CERTAIN LEASE SHOWN BELOW AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8703100679. AU 20. REAL PROPERTY LICENSE, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LICENSOR: FRANCISCAN HEALTH <SYS-WEST LICENSEE: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT RECORDED: FEBRUARY 11, 1998 RECORDING NUMBER: 9802110367 AFFECTS: AN EASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT AV 21. DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: JULY 26, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 20010726001845 AV AFFECTS: LOTS 6, 8, AND 9. AX 22. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: INGRESS AND EGRESS AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF LOT 8 AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JULY 26, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 20010726001846 AY 23. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 PURPOSE: WATER FACILITIES AREA AFFECTED: PORTIONS OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JULY 26, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 20010726001847 AZ 24. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BA BB BC GRANTEE: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PURPOSE: WATER FACILITIES AREA AFFECTED: PORTIONS OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT RECORDED: JULY 26, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 20010726001848 25. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, EASEMENTS AND LIABILITY FOR ASSESSMENTS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: MARCH 19, 1974 7403190539 AFFECTS: THAT PORTION OF PARCEL A LYING WITHIN WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS PARK. AMENDMENT AND/OR MODIFICATION OF SAID RESTRICTIONS: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: NOVEMBER 29, 1979 7911290745 BD 26. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: ROBERT D. SMITH AND JERALYN A. SMITH AND: WATER DISTRICT NO. 100 RECORDED: MAY 7, 1965 RECORDING NUMBER: 5876298 REGARDING: WATERLINE INSTALLATION BE AFFECTS: PORTIONS OF LOTS 6, 8, AND 9, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. BF 27. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT ST. FRANCIS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF FEDERAL WAY PLATCRBZ/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 JANUARY 27, 1986 8601270334 DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTING WATER MAINS BG SAID AGREEMENT HAS BEEN MODIFIED BY AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPER EXTENSION AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8607010661. BH AFFECTS: THAT PORTION OF PARCEL A LYING WITHIN WEST CAMPUS BUSINESS PARK. BI 28. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AND: ST. FRANCIS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL RECORDED: FEBRUARY 27, 1986 RECORDING NUMBER: 8602270423 REGARDING: DEVELOPER EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR SEWER SERVICE BJ 29. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AND: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES RECORDED: MAY 18, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8705181409 REGARDING: WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM BK AFFECTS: LOT 4. BL 30. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: GRANA INVESTMENTS AND: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SERVICES OF WASHINGTON RECORDED: JUNE 5, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: 8906050108 REGARDING: ROADWAY MAINTENANCE BM 31. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AND: ST. FRANCIS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL RECORDED: APRIL 16, 1992 RECORDING NUMBER: 9204161422 REGARDING: WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM AND COSTS RELATING THERETO PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 BN SAID AGREEMENT ALSO APPEARS OF RECORD UNDER INSTRUMENT(S) RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER(S) 9207230544. BO THE LIEN CREATED BY PARAGRAPH 21 OF SAID AGREEMENT HAS BEEN RELEASED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9503301417. BP AFFECTS: PARCEL A. BQ 32. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT AND: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION RECORDED: JULY 1, 1996 RECORDING NUMBER: 9607010415 REGARDING: SANITARY SEWER AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS AND COSTS RELATED THERETO BR THE LIEN CREATED BY PARAGRAPH 25 OF SAID AGREEMENT HAS BEEN RELEASED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9802110363 AS CORRECTED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20020222001419. BS AFFECTS: AN EASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. BT NON -ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT IN REGARDS TO SAID AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEF: BETWEEN: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION AND: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020222001422 BU 33. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES WEST AND: CABLE TV PUGET SOUND, INC. DBA TCI OF WASHINGTON RECORDED: APRIL 19, 2000 RECORDING NUMBER: 20000419000333 REGARDING: INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT TO PROVIDE MULTI -CHANNEL VIDEO PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 PROGRAMMING AND ANY OTHER SERVICES BV AFFECTS: LOTS 6, 8, AND 9. BW 34. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND: R&F PROPERTIES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED: OCTOBER 19, 2000 RECORDING NUMBER: 20001019001019 REGARDING: LATECOMERS AGREEMENT FOR DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS BX AFFECTS: AN EASTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL A, AND OTHER PROPERTY, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. BY 35. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, AWNP RECORDED: JULY 16, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 20010716000500 REGARDING: MEMORANDUM OF VOLUNTARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BZ AFFECTS: PARCEL B, AND PORTIONS OF PARCEL A, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. CA 36. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT AND: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER: 20010925002162 REGARDING: WATER SERVICE CB AFFECTS: PORTIONS OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. CC THE LIEN CREATED BY PARAGRAPH 23 OF SAID AGREEMENT HAS BEEN RELEASED BY PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20041112001754. CD 37. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, AWNP RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020222001423 REGARDING: COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS CE AFFECTS: PARCEL A. CF 38. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY FEBRUARY 27, 1974 7402270420 CG AFFECTS: EASTERLY PORTIONS OF PARCEL A, ABUTTING 9TH AVENUE SOUTH. CH 39. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF NOTICE OF CHARGES BY WATER, SEWER, AND/OR STORM AND SURFACE WATER UTILITIES, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8106010916. CI 40, GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES AFFECTS: LOT 1. 2005 750451-0050-03 1205 $ 660,200.00 $ 5,455,900.00 BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE NOTE: TAXES FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 84,339.90 HAVE BEEN PAID. CJ 41. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF PLATCRBZ/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES AFFECTS: LOT 2. 2005 750451-0040-06 1205 $ 386,300.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE NOTE: TAXES FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 6,438.23 HAVE BEEN PAID. CK 42. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES AFFECTS: LOT 3. 2005 750451-0030-08 1205 $ 176,900.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE NOTE: TAXES FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 2,926.96 HAVE BEEN PAID. CL 43. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES 2005 750451-0010-02 1205 $ 217,600.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE PLATCRBZ/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) AFFECTS: LOT 4. Order No.: 1153726 NOTE: TAXES FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 3,618.00 HAVE BEEN PAID. CM 44. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 750451-0060-01 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: GENERAL TAXES AS TO LOT 5. CN 45. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES 2005 750451-0060-01 1205 $ NOT AVAILABLE $ NOT AVAILABLE BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: SPECIAL TAXES FOR AS TO LOT 5. NOTE: SPECIAL TAXES FOR SURFACE WATER FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 2,323.72 HAVE BEEN PAID. CO 46. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 750451-0020-00 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 AFFECTS: GENERAL TAXES AS TO LOT 6. CP 47. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES 2005 750451-0020-00 1205 $ NOT AVAILABLE $ NOT AVAILABLE BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: SPECIAL TAXES AS TO LOT 6. NOTE: SPECIAL TAXES FOR SURFACE WATER FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 4,204.02 HAVE BEEN PAID. CQ 48. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 750451-0080-07 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: GENERAL TAXES AS TO LOT 7. CR 49. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 750451-0070-09 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: GENERAL TAXES AS TO LOT 8. PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 CS 50. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES 2005 750451-0070-09 1205 $ NOT AVAILABLE $ NOT AVAILABLE BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: SPECIAL TAXES AS TO LOT 8. NOTE: SPECIAL TAXES FOR SURFACE WATER FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 595.14 HAVE BEEN PAID. CT 51. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 750451-0100-03 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: GENERAL TAXES AS TO LOT 9, CU 52. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 750451-0090-05 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: GENERAL TAXES AS TO TRACT "X". PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 CV 53. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES 2005 750451-0090-05 1205 $ NOT AVAILABLE $ NOT AVAILABLE BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: SPECIAL TAXES AS TO TRACT "X". NOTE: SPECIAL TAXES FOR SURFACE WATER FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 850.19 HAVE BEEN PAID. CW 54. THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 750451-0110-01 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT AVAILABLE ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT AVAILABLE AFFECTS: GENERAL TAXES AS TO TRACT "Z" CX 55. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: AFFECTS: PARCEL B. 2005 202104-9038-04 1205 $ 670,500.00 $ 0.00 BILLED: $ NOT AVAILABLE PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ NOT AVAILABLE PLATCRBZ/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 NOTE: TAXES FOR 2004 IN THE SUM OF $ 8,189.62 HAVE BEEN PAID. CY 56. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8504239003 AND BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8510179005, AS FOLLOWS: 1) EXISITING BARBED WIRE FENCE ENCROACHES 6 FEET, MORE OR LESS, OVER THE NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL B AND TRACT "Z" ONTO SAID PARCELS. 2) LINE OF DOWNED FENCE POSTS ENCROACH 6 FEET WEST OF WESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B ONTO ADJOINING LANDS. 3) SURVEY MONUMENTS MARKING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE PLAT OF F.C. GILLS CEDAR PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 88 OF PLATS, PAGE 32, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ENCROACH ONTO SOUTHERLY PORTIONS OF PARCEL B AND LOT 8. CZ 57. LEASE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DA DB DC DD LESSOR: ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SERVICES LESSEE: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP FOR A TERM OF: 55 YEARS RECORDED: MARCH 10, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8703100679 AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A LYING WITHIN LOT 1 AND TRACTS A AND B OF KING COUNTY SHORT PLAT NUMBER 386052. AMENDMENT AND/OR MODIFICATION OF LEASE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: JULY 8, 1988 8807080834 AMENDMENT AND/OR MODIFICATION OF LEASE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: OCTOBER 10, 1990 9010100358 AMENDMENT AND/OR MODIFICATION OF LEASE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AUGUST 24, 1998 9808240423 PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 DE 58. DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND/OR LEASES, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION AND MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON AMOUNT: $ 6,400,000.00 DATED: DECEMBER 18, 1996 RECORDED: DECEMBER 19, 1996 RECORDING NUMBER: 9612191597 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. DF AFFECTS: PORTIONS OF PARCEL A, AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. DG 59. MEMORANDUM OF LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE LEASE DISCLOSED THEREIN: LESSOR: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC LESSEE: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST RECORDED: DECEMBER 19, 1996 RECORDING NUMBER: 9612191598 DH AFFECTS: A PORTION OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. DI 60. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON TENANT: TERENCE THOMPSON, DPM LANDLORD: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C. RECORDED: FEBRUARY 19, 1997 RECORDING NUMBER: 9702191394 DJ AFFECTS: A PORTION OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. DK 61. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON TENANT: MEDALIA HEALTHCARE, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LANDLORD: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C. RECORDED: FEBRUARY 19, 1997 RECORDING NUMBER: 9702191395 DL AFFECTS: A PORTION OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. DM 62. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON TENANT: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION LANDLORD: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C. RECORDED: FEBRUARY 19, 1997 RECORDING NUMBER: 9702191396 ON AFFECTS: A PORTION OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT. DO 63. DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND/OR LEASES, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES; AND FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST TRUSTEE: RAINIER CREDIT COMPANY BENEFICIARY: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, DOING BUSINESS AS SEAFIRST BANK AMOUNT: $ 3,973,000.00 DATED: AUGUST 14, 1998 RECORDED: AUGUST 24, 1998 RECORDING NUMBER: 9808240424 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. DP AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 DQ 64. UNRECORDED LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DR DS DT DU DV LESSOR: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP LESSEE(S): FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, DBA PACLAB DISCLOSED BY: SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9808240425 AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AUGUST 24, 1998 9808240425 SAID AGREEMENT RELATES TO THE LIEN PRIORITY OF THE ABOVE LEASE AND THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9808240424. 65. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, DOING BUSINESS AS SEAFIRST BANK TENANT: AUBURN FEDERAL WAY GASTROENTEROLOGISTS, P.S. LANDLORD: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECORDED: AUGUST 24, 1998 RECORDING NUMBER: 9808240426 AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) 66. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, DOING BUSINESS AS SEAFIRST BANK TENANT: JAE C. HONG, M.D. LANDLORD: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECORDED: AUGUST 24, 1998 PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY DW DX BY DZ EA EB RECORDING NUMBER: PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) 9808240427 AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) Order No.: 1153726 67. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, DOING BUSINESS AS SEAFIRST BANK TENANT: LARRY D. STONESIFER, M.D., P.S. LANDLORD: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECORDED: AUGUST 24, 1998 RECORDING NUMBER: 9808240428 AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) 68. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, DOING BUSINESS AS SEAFIRST BANK TENANT: CARDIOVASCULAR CONSULTANTS, INC., P.S. LANDLORD: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECORDED: AUGUST 24, 1998 RECORDING NUMBER: 9808240429 AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) 69. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, DOING BUSINESS AS SEAFIRST BANK TENANT: JOHN S. WENDT, M.D. LANDLORD: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP RECORDED: AUGUST 24, 1998 RECORDING NUMBER: 9808240430 PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 EC AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) ED 70. UNRECORDED LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP LESSEE(S): FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, DBA ST. FRANCIS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DISCLOSED BY: SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9808240431 EE AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) EF SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER AUGUST 24, 1998 9808240431 SAID AGREEMENT RELATES TO THE LIEN PRIORITY OF THE ABOVE LEASE AND THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9808240424. EG 71. UNRECORDED LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP LESSEE(S): ST, FRANCIS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF FEDERAL WAY, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION DISCLOSED BY: SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9808240432 EH AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) El SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AUGUST 24, 1998 9808240432 SAID AGREEMENT RELATES TO THE LIEN PRIORITY OF THE ABOVE LEASE AND THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9808240424. PLATCRBZ/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 EJ 72. UNRECORDED LEASE, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER ASSOCIATES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP LESSEE(S): FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, DBA ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL DISCLOSED BY: SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9808240433 EK AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 4) EL SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AUGUST 24, 1998 9808240433 SAID AGREEMENT RELATES TO THE LIEN PRIORITY OF THE ABOVE LEASE AND THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9808240424. EM 73. LANDLORD, VENDOR OR MORTGAGEE WAIVER AND CONSENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LANDLORD: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER TENANT: MICHAEL S. DAVIDOV LENDER: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., DOING BUSINESS AS SEAFIRST BANK RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 RECORDING NUMBER 20010910000021 AFFECTS: PORTION OF PARCEL A (LOT 3) EN 74. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION AND: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020222001424 REGARDING: MATTERS RELATING TO THE LOAN MADE BY KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TO MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF 8,300,000.00 PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 EO 75. DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND/OR LEASES, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AMOUNT: $ 8,300,000.00 DATED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020222001425 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. EP AFFECTS: LOT 1. EQ ASSIGNMENT OF SAID DEED OF TRUST: DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2002 RECORDED: JUNE 27, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020627001859 ASSIGNEE: WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS -THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-CKO1 ER 76. ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS GIVEN FOR SECURITY AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ASSIGNOR: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ASSIGNEE: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION DATED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020222001426 ET AFFECTS: LOT 1, ES ASSIGNMENT OF SAID ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS: PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2002 RECORDED: JUNE 27, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020627001859 ASSIGNEE: WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS -THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-CK01 EU 77. FINANCING STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: SECURED PARTY: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION DEBTOR: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, L.L.C. COVERS: PERSONAL PROPERTY AND FIXTURES LOCATED ON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020222001427 EV AFFECTS: LOT 1. EW ASSIGNMENT OF FINANCING STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: MAY 16, 2003 RECORDING NUMBER: 20030516000984 ASSIGNEE: WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS -THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2002-CK01 EX 78. SUBORDINATION, NONDISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LENDER: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION TENANT: FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM -WEST, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION LANDLORD: MEDICAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES LLC., A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED: FEBRUARY 22, 2002 RECORDING NUMBER: 20020222001428 EY AFFECTS: LOT 1. PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) Order No.: 1153726 EZ 79. FINANCING STATEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: SECURED PARTY: DEBTOR: COVERS: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: FA AFFECTS: LOT 4. STERLING SAVINGS BANK THE PAIN CENTER OF WESTERN WASHINGTON, PLLC PERSONAL PROPERTY AND FIXTURES LOCATED ON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AUGUST 19, 2004 20040819002138 FB 80. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF THE PAIN CENTER OF WESTERN WASHINGTON, PLLC, PRESUMED FROM THE EXECUTION OF INSTRUMENT SET FORTH AT PARAGRAPH 79. FC 81. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY INSTALLED UPON SAID PROPERTY AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. FD 82. RIGHTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND/OR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON TO RECOVER ANY PUBLIC FUNDS ADVANCED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF ONE OR MORE VARIOUS FEDERAL ACTS RELATING TO HEALTH CARE, OR ANY STATE STATUTE ENACTED PURSUANT THERETO. FF 83. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. END OF SCHEDULE B PLATCRB2/RDA/0999 1` ` OFFICE:523-1380 ROSS W. ENSLEY Consulting Forester - Timber Cruising 3622 N.E. 100TH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125 TREE COUNT REPORT - 4.47 ACRES r4scsv4 so JAN 1 1 N05 Ci.T� � , DE? - WAY LOT 1 KING COUNTY LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 8508060815 OCTOBER 28, 1999 CRUISE CONDUCTED & REPORT PREPARED BY TREE DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT D.B.H.) ALL SPECIES PROJECTED FROM A 20% CRUISE - 4.47 ACRES D.B.H. 60 to 80 YEAR DOUGLAS FIR 90 to 125 YEAR DOUGLAS FIR 60 to 80 YEAR HEMLOCK 60 to 80 YEAR RED CEDAR 40 to 60 YEAR' ALDER TOTAL 6 50 -- -- 5 -- 55 :7 25 -- -- -- -- 25 8 20 -- -- 5 10 35 9 35 -- 5 10 5 55 10 10 -- -- -- -- 10 11 50 -- 5 25 -- 80 12 35 -- -- 20 -- 55 13 35 5 -- 5 -- 45 14 30 5 5 -- -- 40 15 15 -- -- -- -- 15 16 15 -- -- 5 '' 20 17 30 -- -- 10 -- 40 18 15 -- - -- 10 -- 25 19 5 5 -- 10 20 5 -- 5 5 - 15 21 10 -- -- -- -- 10 22 10 -- -- -- -- 10 23 5 -- -- -- -- 5 24 5 -- -- -5 -- 10 25 -- _ -_ -- -_ -- 26 -- -- -- -- -- -- 27 5 -- -- __ -- 5 28 -- 5 -- -- -- 5 29 5 5 30 -- -- -- -- -- -- 31 5 -- - 5 32 -- -- -- 5 6 TOTALS 410 20 25 115 15 585 NOTE: There are 585 trees of all species 6" to 32 inch D.B.H. based on four 1/5 acre plots, which is a 20% cruise expanded by a factor of five. A factor of five indicates an estimated total of 585 trees. If a 100% tree count cruise were conducted, the above estimates could change. OFFICE:523-1380 ROSS W. ENSLEY Consulting Forester - Timber Cruising 3622 N.E. 10OTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98125 TIMBER VOLUME APPRAISAL & GRADE ESTIMATE REPORT LOT 1 - PORTION OF THE NE4 SW4 SECTION 20,, T. 21 N., R. 4 E.W.M. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 4.47 ACRES CRUISE CONDUCTED & REPORT PREPARED BY : r7f,2 h) mss W. ENS[ STATEMENT OF ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING 'CONDITIONS 1. No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature. Questions of liens, boundaries, overlaps or encumbrances, if any, have been disregarded. 2. It is assumed that legal rights -of -way are either in existence -or can be obtained. 3. The property lanes and acreages were developed from the best available information. No legal land surveying was contemplated or conducted during the course of the cruise. Consequently, no responsibility or liability is assumed for the correct location or land area. 4. All information contained herein is believed to be correct but no guarantee or assumption of liability is intended. S. Delivery of this report concludes the assignment. TIMBER VOLUME & GRADE ESTIMATE REPORT Date of Examination October 26, 1999. Description Lot 1 - Portion of the NE-4 SW4 of Section 20, T. 21 N. R. 4 E.W.M., King County Washington. King County Lot Line Adjustment No. 8508060815. Area Approximately 4.47 acres. Accessibility Good access by a black top road to the South Line of the tract. Stumpage Value The estimated standing tree value to the timber owner is $37,251.00. Topography ' : Flat. Boundaries Found the S.W. & S.E. approximate corners. It is estimated that a survey with flagged cutting boundaries would cost $1,000.00. Logging Conditions Good ground vehicle logging show. Road Building Good road building conditions. It is estimated that 200 feet of new road construction and a logging landing would cost $1,000.00. Species Douglas Fir, Western Red Cedar, Western Hemlock and Alder. Aae 40 to 125 years old. See the balance of the report for estimated ages by species. Site Good forest growing site 2 to 3. General Remarks A fair to good all age stand of conifers with a few scattered hardwoods found on a good growing and logging site. There has been some fire wood cutting over the past ten years. There are beetles in the Douglas Fir and some dead snags and blown down trees were noted. Most of the trees have survived the beetle attacks. We conducted a 20% (4-1/5 acre plots) cruise by 36 ft. logs for the export wood and 32 ft. logs for the domestic wood to a 5" top and 16 ft. log. It is estimated that there are 585 trees 6" D.B.H. and up for all species. D.B.H. is the outside tree diameter four feet six inches above the ground. It is estimated that_ h ere are 410 - 60 to 80 year old Douglas Fir, 20 -�9Qto 125 year old Douglas Fir, 115 Red Cedar, 25 Hemlock and 15 Alder trees 6" D.B.H. and up. See the balance of the report for D.B.H. sizes by species. Stumpage value is the value the tree owner should realize after logging. TREE DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT D.B.H.) ALL SPECIES PROJECTED FROM A 20% CRUISE - 4.47 ACRES D.B.H. 60 to 80 90 to 125 60 to 80 60 to 80 40 to 60 TOTAL YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAk ° DOUGLAS FIR DOUGLAS FIR HEMLOCK RED CEDAR ALDER 6 50 -- -- 5 55 :7 25 -- -- 25 8 20 -- -- 5 10 35 9 35 -- 5 10 5 55 10 10 -- -- -- -- 10 11 50 -- 5 25 -- 80 1.2 35 -- -- 20 -- 55 13 35 5 -- 5 -- 45 14 30 5 5 -- -- 40 15 15 -- -- -- - 15 16 15 -- -- 5 20 17 30 -- -- 10 -- 40 18 15 10 -- 25 19 5 -- 5 -- 10 20 5 -- 5 5 -- 15 21 10 -- --- -- 10 22 10 - - -- -- 10 23 5 _ -- -- 5 24 5 -- - 5 -- 10 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- 26 -- -- -- -- -- -- 27 5 -- __ __ __ 5 28 -- 5 5 2.9 -- 5 -- -- -- 5 30 -- -- -- -- -- -- 31 -- -- 5 -- -- 5 32 -- -- -- 5 -- 9 TOTALS 410 20 25 115 15 585 NOTE: There are 585 trees of all species 6" to 32 inch D.B.H. based on four 1/5 acre plots, which is a 20% cruise expanded by a factor of five. A factor of five indicates an estimated total of 585 trees. If a 100% tree count cruise were conducted, the above estimates could chanae. TOTAL TIMBER SUMMARY - 4.47 ACRES SAWLOG - ALL SPECIES 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - M.B.Fi Species Volume 60 to 80 Year Old Douglas Fir 58 60 to 80 Year Old Western Red Cedar 13 90 to 125 Year Old Douglas Fir 12 60 to 80 Year Old Western Hemlock 8 Sub -Total 91 Estimated Net Volume Per Acre (4 Timbered Acres) Is 22.8 M.B.F. HARDWOOD PULP 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - M.B.F. Species Volume Alder 1 Sub -Total 1 CONIFER UTILITY 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - M.B.F. Species Volume Douglas Fir 4 Western Red Cedar 1 Western Hemlock 1 Sub -Total 6 GRAND TOTAL 98 M.B.F. ESTIMATED GROSS VOLUME PER ACRE (4 TIMBERED ACRES) IS 24.5 M.B.F. STUMPAGE DETERMINATION SHEET - 4.47 ACRES ESTIMATED STUMPAGE VALUES ALL SPECIES Description Volume Est. Market Est. Logging Stumpage Total Estimated M. Bd. Ft. Value Per M Cost Per M _Value Per M Stumpage Value 60 - 80 YEAR DOUGLAS FIR 2 Saw J Export 6 $750.00 $204.00 $546.00 $ 3,276.00 2 Saw C Export 8 670.00 204.00 466.00 3.728.00 2 Saw K Export 5 600.00 204.00 396.00 11980.00 2 Saw Domestic 2 475.00 204.00 271.00 542.00 3 Saw J Export 3 690.00 204.00 486.00 1,458.00 3 Saw C Export 3 670.00 204.00 466.00 1,398.00 3 Saw K,Expaft.. 11 600.00 204.00 396.00 4,356.00 3"Sarw Domestic 15 440.00 204.00 236.00 3,540.00 4 Saw Domestic 4 420.00 204.00 216.00 864.00 Merch. Cull 1 440.00 204.00 236.00 236.00 Utilitz Cull 2 210.00 204.00 6.00 12.00 Total 60 $21,390.00 Average 60 - 80 Year Douglas Fir Stumpage Value Is $356.50 Per M.B.F. 90 - 125 YEAR DOUGLAS FIR 2 Saw C Export 2 $670.00 $204.00 $466.00 $ 932.00 2 Saw K Export 1 600.00 204.00 396.00 396.00 2 Saw Domestic 4 475.00 204.00 271.00 1,084.00 3 Saw Domestic 4 440.00 204.00 236.00 944.00 Merch. Cull 1 440.00 204.00 236.00 236.00 Utility Cull 2 210.00 204.00 6.00 12.00 Tb,ta 1 14 � - _ $ 3, 604.00 Average 90 - 125 Year Douglas Fir Stumpage Value Is $257.43 Per M.B.F. RED CEDAR 3 Saw Domestic 11 $1,100.00 $204.00 $896.00 $ 9,856.00 4 Saw Domestic 1 850.00 204.00 646.00 646.00 Merch. Cull 1 850.00 204.00 646.00 646.00 utility Cull 1 210.00 204.00 6.00 6.00 Total 14 - - 11,154.00 Average Red Cedar.Stumpage Value Is $796.71 Per M.B.F. HEMLOCK 2 Saw K Export 2 $375.00 $204.00 $171.00 $ 342.00 2 Saw Domestic 2 350.00 204.00 146.00 292.00 3 Saw K Export 1 350.00 204.00 146.00 146.00 3 Saw Domestic 1 325.00 2.04.00 121.00 121.00 4 Saw Domestic 1 300.00 204.00 96.00 96.00 Merch. Cull 1 300.00 204.00 96.00 96.00 Utility Cull 1 210.00 204.00 6.00 6.00 Total 9 _ $ 1,099.00 Average Hemlock Stumpage Value Is $122..11 Per M.B.F. (continued) Page 2. STUMPAGE DETERMINATION SHEET - 4.47 ACRES ESTIMATED STUMPAGE VALUES ALL SPECIES Description Volume Est. Market Est. Logging Stumpage Total Estimated M. Bd. Ft. Value Per M Cost Per M Value Per M Stumpage Value_ AL DER Pulpto5" Top 1 $175.00 $171.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 Total 1 4.00 Average'Alder Stumpage Value Is $4.'00 Per M.B.F. GRAND TOTALS 98 M.B.F. - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ $37,251,!00 TOTALHESTTMATED STANDING TREE (STUMPAGE) VALUE IS - - - - - - - - - - - - $37,251.00 ESTIMATED LOGGING COST TO THE PUGET SOUND AREA CONIFERS TO : EVERETT, TACOMA. OLYMPIA AREA Item Cost Per M.B.F. Fell & Buck $ 18.00 Yard & Load 65.00 Transportation 34.38 General Administration 7.50 Yield Tax (Est.) 35.00 Road & Landing Cost 10.20 Fire Protection & Prevention 5.00 Right of Way Fees 0.00 Surveying Cost 10.20 Profit To Logger 10% 18.72 TOTAL $204.00 HARDWOODS TO : ARLINGTON, TACOMA AREA Item Cost Per M.B.F. Fell & Buck $ 18.00 Yard & Load 65.00 Transportation 34.38 General Administration 7.50 Yield Tax (Est.) 5.00 Road & Landing Cost 10.20 Fire Protection & Prevention 5.00 Right of Way Fees '0! 00 Surveying Cost 10.20 Profit To Logger �10%) 15.72 TOTAL $171.00 Road Cost: $1.000.00 = 98 M.B.F. = $10.20 Per M.B.F. Surveying Cost : $$1,000.00 _ 98 M.B.F. = $10.20 Per M.B.F. MAP TYPE CLASSIFICATION SHEET - 4.47 ACRES Type No. Description Acres 1. 100% stocking of 40 to 125 year old conifers and scattered 4.00 hardwoods. Average age is 70 years. The average gross volume per acre is 24.5 M.B.F. Some firewood thinning over the past 10 years. Most of the Douglas Fir trees have survived a recent beetle attack. Volume varies from 20 to 30 M.B.F. per acre. Average volume per acre is 24.5 M.B.F. Site 2 to 3. 2. Open area cleared about 5 plus years ago. Site 3. There .47 is no economic volume or tree count on this area. TOTAL 4,47 THE FOLLOWING ARE VOLUME & GRADE ESTIMATES BY SPECIES VOLUME & GRADE ESTIMATES - 4.47 ACRES 60 to 80 YEAR OLD DOUGLAS FIR 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - 410 TREES Grade % Volume Volume - M.B.F. #2 Saw Export - J 10.0% 6 #2 Saw Export - C 13.3% 8 #2 Saw Export - K 8.3% 5 #2 Saw Dom. 3.3% 2 #3 Saw Export 8 - 11" Top - J 5.0% 3 #3 Saw Export - C 5.0% #3 Saw, - K 18, % 1 �E�pprt #3 SOry #4 Saw Dom. 8.7� 4 (Merch. Cull) 1/3 to 1/2 sound 1.7% 1 (Utility Cull) Less than 1/3 sound 3.3% 2 TOTAL 100.0% 60 Average tree contains 146 bd. ft. and has fair to good form. Trees are all size, limby and have defects. Some stump rot, rot, sweep, spike knots, croak, large limbs and roughness. Average age is 70 years. The average tree will produce 2 to 2 1/2 - 36 ft. logs. Most of the trees show evidence of beetle attacks. 90 to 125 YEAR OLD DOUGLAS FIR 13" D.B.H. & UP TO A 10" TOP - 20 TREES Grade % Volume Volume - M.B.F. #2 Saw Export - C 14.3% 2 #2 Saw Export - K 7.1% 1 #2 Saw Dom. 28.6% 4 #3 S6w�:iD6b.. 28.6% 4 (Merch. Cull) 1/3 to 1/2 sound 7.1% 1 (Utility Cull) Less than 1/3 sound 14.3% 2 TOTAL - 100.coil --- - 14 Average tree contains 700 bd. ft. and has fair form. Trees are all size, limby and defective. There is considerable stump rot, rot, spike knots, sweep, fluted butts, large limbs and roughness. Average age is 110 years. The average tree will produce 3 - 36 ft. logs.. Most of the trees show evidence of beetle attacks. VOLUME & GRADE ESTIMATES - 4.47 ACRES 60 to 80 YEAR OLD WESTERN RED CEDAR 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - 115 TREES Grade % Volume Volume - M.B.F. #3 Saw Dom. 78.6% 11 #4 Saw Dom. 7.1% 1 (Merch. Cull) 1/3 to 1/2 sound 7.1% 1 -Utility Cull Less than 1/3 sound 7.2% 1 TOTAL -- - 100.0% - --- 14 Average tree contains 122 bd. ft. and has fair to good form. Trees are all age, all size, limby and defective. Considerable stump rot, rot, large limbs, sweep, crook, woodpecker holes and roughnes. Average age is 70 years. The average tree will produce 1 - 32 ft. logs. Some of the trees show evidence of worms and ant attacks. 60 to 80 YEAR OLD WESTERN HEMLOCK 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - 25 TREES Grade % Volume Volume - M B.F. #2 Saw Export - K 22.2% 2'� #2 Saw Dom. 22.2% 2 #3 Saw Export - K 11.1% 1 #3 Saw Dom. 11.1% 1 #4 Saw Dom. 11.1% 1 (Merch. Cull) 1/3 to 1/2 sound 11.1% 1 (Utility Cull) Less than 1/3 sound 11.2% 1 TOTAL 100.0% 9 Average tree contains 360 bd. ft. and has fair to good form. Trees are all age, all size, limby and have some defects. Some stump rot, rot, sweep, crook, large limbs and roughness. Average age is 70 years. The average tree will produce 2 to 3 - 32 ft. logs. 40 to 60 YEAR OLD ALDER 6" D.B.H. & UP TO A 5" TOP - 15 TREES Grade % Volume Volume _ M.B.F. Put 5" Top & Up 100.0% 1 TOTAL Average tree contains 67 bd. ft. and has fair form. Trees are'small, fairly clean and generally free of defect. Some sweep, crook and rot. Average age is 50 years. The average tree will produce 1 - 32 ft. log. Z:-W 5 11 hI i C a a cis j Q. kj 6L O%y moo, 10 .4 I V lhh.- 11 P gL f4 41" 0 �4. SOCU4 TE .vWALTOR S.-