Loading...
14-101058FILE CITY OF �..r Federal July 25, 2014 Otak Inc Chad Weiser 10230 NE Points Drive, 4400 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: File #14-101058-00-UP; USE PROCESS III `PROJECT APPROVAL' Federal Way High School, 30611 16th Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Weiser: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com The Community Development Department has completed the Use Process III application review of the proposed replacement of the existing Federal Way High School with a new 235,885 square -foot facility. Additional improvements associated with the replacement include parking reconfiguration, ball fields, tennis courts, stormwater flow control/treatment, right-of-way improvements, and landscaping. The Use Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application as it relates to the site plan review is hereby approved based on the enclosed findings of fact, incorporated into this decision in full, and the following decisional criteria and conclusions based on those facts: 1. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; 2. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRQ 3. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; 6. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated; and 7. It is consistent with the site design standards set forth for all zoning districts and applicable supplemental guidelines set forth in the Community Design Guidelines. The remainder of this letter outlines the land use review process required for this particular site improvement; summarizes the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process; lists conditions of the land use decision; and provides other procedural information. This land use decision does not authorize the initiation of construction activities. SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS Pursuant to FWRC 19.220.040, school uses within a Community Business (BC) zoning district that is not exempt from SEPA shall be processed under Use Process III. SEPA PROCESS The City of Federal Way acted as lead agency for the proposal and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) with conditions on March 28, 2014. Following review of the environmental checklist, the city determined the proposal would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the Mr. Weiser July 25, 2014 Page 2 environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement would not be required. The city's Responsible Official used SEPA substantive authority to include the following conditions with the DNS: 1. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit, the applicant shall submit a cultural resource assessment, prepared by a qualified professional, to the Community Development Department and Brandon Reynon of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians. Any needed mitigation and/or avoidance measures shall be designed based upon the results of the survey, in consultation with the Puyallup Tribe and Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation; and Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a soil sampling and cleanup report per the Tacoma Smelter Plume Model Remedies Guidance. If soil contaminants are found to be elevated per the guidance, the applicant shall remedy the soils per the guidance as a component of the grading permit and then submit a written approval of cleanup (No Further Action) from the Department of Ecology following completion of the grading activities. The No Further Action document shall be submitted to the department prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant has submitted reports for each item prior to the issuance of the Use Process III decision. Based on the findings of the cultural resource report, the applicant will be required to incorporate archeological monitoring into the construction specifications with the site contractor. No contamination was found related to the Tacoma Smelter Plume during the soil sampling and therefore no written approval from the Department of Ecology is required. These SEPA based mitigation conditions are incorporated into the Use Process III decision in full and shall be implemented pursuant to the city's Environmental Policy set forth in FWRC 14.25.060. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following conditions are reasonably necessary to eliminate or minimize undesirable effects of granting application approval. 1. To reduce the impacts of vehicle overhang into adjacent pedestrian connections to the building, street, or parking lot, wheel stops shall be included on stalls adjacent to pedestrian walkways. Alternatively, the pedestrian walkways can be widened to 8 feet in width. 2. Generator, transformer and 10-foot enclosure shall not be located in 20-foot required yard along South 308 h St. A cut -sheet detailing this area that includes the generator, transformer, metal screen, and Type III landscaping screen shall be included with the building permit plan set in order to verify its placement in relation to the required front yard and review for Community Design Guideline compliance. 3. A final landscaping plan shall be submitted with the building permit set that includes species, size, quantity, spacing, etc. corresponding to the required landscaping type. Additionally, the plan shall incorporate a management manual using best management practices (BMPs) and integrated pest management (IPM) for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications as required by Wellhead Protection Zone regulations set forth in FWRC 19.185.070. 4. The applicant shall incorporate archeological monitoring, to the city's satisfaction, into construction specifications with the site contractor to ensure compliance with SEPA conditions. 5. A final photometric lighting plan that indicates the fixtures, height and footcandles shall be submitted with the building permit plan set. 14-101058 Doc. LD. 66269 Mr. Weiser July 25, 2014 Page 3 BUILDING PERMIT & ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS This Process III land use decision does not constitute a building permit or authorize clearing/grading activities. The applicant shall obtain building permits and engineering review for construction activities from the Community Development Department and Public Works Department. REQUESTS FOR CHANGE OF VALUATION Any affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes, not withstanding any program of revaluation. APPROVAL DURATION Unless modified or appealed, this site plan approval is valid for five years from the date of issuance of the decision. Time extensions to the decision may be requested prior to the lapse of approval following the provisions listed in FWRC 19.15.110. APPEALS The effective date of issuance is three calendar days following the date of this letter, or July 28, 2014. Pursuant to FWRC 19.65.120, this land use decision may be appealed by any person who submitted written comments or any person who has specifically requested a copy of the decision. Any appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Community Development Department with the established fee and within 14 days after the effective date of issuance of this decision, or August 11, 2014. The appeal letter must contain a clear reference to the matter being appealed and a statement of the factual findings and conclusion of the Director disputed by the person filing the appeal. CLOSING This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Matthew Herrera, Senior Planner, at 253-835- 2638 or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Isaac Conlen Planning Manager for Larry Frazier, Interim Director enc: Exhibit `A' Statement of Findings and Conclusions Exhibit `B' Approved Site Plan c: w/ Findings: Lloyd Hara, King County Assessor, 500 0 Ave., #ADM-AS-0708, Seattle, WA 98104 Matthew Herrera, Senior Planner Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Brandon Reynon, Puyallup Tribe of Indians, 3009 E. Portland Ave., Tacoma, WA 98404 John Wiese, 30405 11t' Ave. S., Federal Way, WA 98003 14-101058 Doc. I.D. 66269 ti E CITY OF 4A Federal Way Exhibit A Statement of Findings and Conclusions Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Chapter 19.65 `Process III Project Approval' Federal Way High School Replacement - File 14-101058-UP The Planning Division hereby makes the following findings pursuant to content requirements of the Process III written decision as set forth in FWRC 19.65.100(4). FINDINGS OF FACT Proposal — The Federal Way Public School District proposes the replacement of the existing Federal Way High School with a new 235,885 square -foot facility. Additional improvements associated with the replacement include parking reconfiguration, ball fields, tennis courts, stormwater flow control/treatment, and landscaping. The existing high school building and pool building will be demolished. Temporary buildings and containers used for construction offices, storage, etc. during the construction and staging process will be located on the subject property as permitted by FWRC 19.275.080. 2. Nonconforming Development — The replacement high school building is viewed as a new and separate structure on an already developed site as set forth in FWRC 19.30.090(1)(a)(ii). As such, the applicant is required to comply with development regulations applicable to the geographic portion of the site on which the new structure and any related improvements are to be constructed. No improvements are proposed on the stadium or its associated parking lot and therefore compliance with current development regulations in those areas will not be required. 3. Existing Site Conditions — The subject property is a single tax parcel identified by the King County Assessor as 082104-9001, approximately 38.32 acres in size, and located at 31031 Pacific Highway South. The parcel is fully developed with the Federal Way High School, appurtenant buildings, surface parking, and athletic fields. Much of the impervious surfaces are located on the eastern portion of the site. The western potion contains athletic fields with mature vegetation along the west and northwest boundary. The topographic survey details gradients that generally trend downward in a southwestern direction with the highest elevation at 489 feet in the northeast corner and lowest elevation 433 feet in the southwest corner. Slopes generally range from 2 percent to 10 percent. As shown on the 1973 Soil Conservation Service Survey of King County, the site contains Arents, Alderwood Material (AmB) with 0-6 percent slopes. The geotechnical analysis has indicated the site's native soils are consistent with the Geologic Map of Poverty Bay. The analysis also concluded no geologically hazardous areas exist on the site. The surrounding streets and zoning designation for the subject property include the following: Adjacent Streets Adjoining Zoning Designations North South 304t Street RM3600; RM2400; and PO East 16 Avenue South & Pacific Highway South BC &•RM1800 South Southth 308t Street BC & RM1800 West N/A RS7.2 Table I Surrounding Streets & Zoning 4. Stormwater — Existing stormwater conditions on the subject property include six subbasins with collection and conveyance consisting of swales, catch basins, area drains, collection structures, and pipes. The subbasins discharge to drain systems along South 304`" Street and South 308`h Street. Both systems drain to Cold Creek with eventual outfall into Poverty Bay. Proposed improvements to the site require drainage upgrades to portions of the site to meet 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and City of Federal Way Addendum standards. In order to meet these requirements, the applicant will collect runoff via swales, catch basins and other structures and convey via tightline to water quality treatment and detention facilities. An above ground pond on the western portion of the site will provide Level 3 flow control for targeted surfaces. Raingardens will provide Enhanced Basic water quality treatment to target pollution generating surfaces. Flow discharging from the pond will be conveyed to the existing city system within South 3081h Street. Right-of-way improvements along South 3Oe Street and South 308t' Street will also include drainage improvements such as catch basins and conveyance. Flow control will be provided on the subject property via mitigation trade of onsite non -targeted areas. Water quality will be provided on the subject property via raingarden. 5. Bulk Limitations — The proposed school replacement building is subject to the following required yard, height and lot coverage standards set forth in Use Zone Chart 19.220.040. Required Yards — Yards Required Proposed Front — South (S. 308` Street frontage 20 feet 40 feet Side — West 20 feet +700 feet Side — East 0 feet 20 feet Rear — North (S. 304 Street frontage) 0 feet +700 feet Table 2 Required Yards (Setbacks) Height — Portions of the building may not exceed 3Oft. above Average Building Elevation (ABE) when located within 100 feet of a residential zone. Otherwise, the outright height limit for the building is 35 feet with an allowance of 55 feet for the gymnasium portion of the building. Special regulation 2 allows the director to approve building heights, other than gymnasiums, of up to 55 feet if criteria are met. The ABE for the building footprint is 468.87 feet. For that portion of the structure within 100 feet of the residential zone along South 308th Street, the highest portion of the building is 29.96 feet above ABE. The proposed height of structure does not exceed the 30-foot vertical limitation for that portion of the building within 100 feet of the residential zone along South 308ffi Street. For the remainder of the proposed structure, the highest portion of building is 43.96 feet above ABE. The applicant has requested a departure from the 35-foot limitation as allowed by Use Zone Chart 19.220.040 special regulation 2. Staff hereby approves the departure request for the approximate 9- foot height allowance as the analysis below meets special regulation 2: a. The additional height allows for a compact building footprint aiding in operational and security. All ground floor spaces have floor -to -floor heights of 14 feet or greater and minimums depths of 15 feet. b. The building height does not exceed 30 feet for that portion within 100 feet of the residential zone along South 308th Street. Statement of Findings and Conclusions Federal Way High School Replacement Page 2 File 14-101058-UP/Doc, LD. 65295 c. Heights over the 35 feet are setback more than the required 9 feet from adjoining nonresidential zones. d. Roof forms incorporate variations in height, forms, and material. Lot Coverage — Special regulation 9 provides no limitation of lot coverage. 6. Impact Reduction on Nearby Residential Areas — Use Zone Chart 19.220.040 special regulations 7 and 14 require specific impact reduction measures. Activities such as auto repair and other uses that may impact adjacent properties must take place within an enclosed building. Site design including location of parking and passenger loading areas shall be designed to reduce impacts on nearby residential areas. These special regulations have been met via the following analysis. No outdoor auto repair or other mechanical repair activities are proposed outside of any building on the subject property. A majority of the parking and passenger loading areas will be on the western portion of the subject property near the 16`" Ave. S. and Pacific Highway South frontages. These areas are screened from the right-of-way with landscaping to the west and screened from the south by the new building. It is setback approximately 650 feet from the adjacent single-family zone and approximately 450 feet from the northern adjoining residential zones. A smaller existing parking area is located near the southwestern corner of the subject property which will be screened with Type I landscaping 20 feet in width along the adjacent single-family zoning district. 7. Community Design Guidelines —As detailed below, the project embodies site and building design principles consistent with requirements of the Community Design Guidelines (FWRC Chapter 19.115). a. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) i. Completed CPTED checklist. ii. Main entrances/exists in view of the street and easily recognizable. iii. Direct and visible pathways. iv. Visibility of surface parking is maintained from the street and building. v. Preliminary lighting plan conforms to IES standards. Final plan with fixture height will be confirmed at building permit submittal. vi. Landscaping does not obstruct natural surveillance. b, Surface Parking — Reconfigured Parking Area Only i. Interior lot landscaping quantity and island dimensions meet requirements.) ii. Delineated pedestrian walkways are provided within parking lot with connections to the building, surrounding streets, and parking lot. iii. Loop access through parking lot is provided. iv. Parking is behind and beside building along 16'' Ave. S. and S. 308' Street. v. Rows are broken up with landscaping to no more than 10 adjacent stalls. With the exception of approved departures for those islands utilized for bioswales. Other oversized islands were only credited with the 305sf of internal lot landscaping pursuant to 19.125.070(3). Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 3 Federal Way High School Replacement File 14-101058-UP/Doc LD. 65295 C. Pedestrian Circulation and Public Space i. Primary building entrance is clearly visible from Pacific Hwy S. ii. Six -foot -wide pedestrian connections are delineated with separate paved routes and provided from adjacent public sidewalk to building entrances. iii. Connections through asphalt parking lot delineated with scored concrete. iv. Pedestrian plazas with seating, landscaping, trash receptacles, located at each of the three main building entrances. v. Bicycle racks located at Entry 3 on the northeast side of the building. vi. Six -foot -wide pedestrian pathways within interior parking lot. Six-foot and greater than six-foot connections provided between the street and building. d. Service Areas and Site Utilities i. Service area is located along northern portion of building separated from pedestrian, drive aisle and building entrances. ii. Area is screened with Type I landscaping and perforated metallic screen wall. iii. Generator and transformer located near required front yard screened with metallic screen wall. Further design review of these features and setback verification is a condition of approval. iv. Rooftop HVAC units are screened behind roof forms and perforated metallic screens. e. Institutional Use Guidelines i. Significant structural modulations with requisite depths and widths are incorporated on the north and west facades. Alternative method for the south and east facades are described in iii. ii. The building's roof design incorporates alternative distinctive forms that create multiple stepped rooflines and vertical modulation that are integral to the design of the building. iii. Alternative methods to organize and shape structural elements on the north and east facades include modulations, pedestrian plazas, landscaping, and streetscape elements. Type III landscaping along the east foundation will be implemented in -lieu of placing the building along the property line as the 0-ft. required side yard intends. The combination of modulations, fagade treatments/articulation and roof design break down the overall bulk of the building to an appropriate scale for the surrounding neighborhood. iv. Lighting fixtures shall not exceed 30 feet, which will be verified with final lighting plan submitted with building permit. f. Building Design— The design and massing of the building meets the general design criteria of the guidelines. Although the institutional building exceeds 230,000sf of gross floor area, the bulk of the structure is broken down with modulation, stepped rooflines, curvilinear forms which all respond to the site's existing topography and aid in providing a more pedestrian scaled building contrary to its overall size. Building entrances are emphasized on the southeast and northeast corners with glazing, weather protection, plazas and streetscape amenities. Exterior building materials include colored brick, metal cladding and street -level glazing which provides an articulation schedule that adds further architectural interest. 8. Perimeter Landscaping — Review of the landscape plan has only verified the plan has noted the required landscaping type and provided the requisite width of planting along the perimeter. Review of the actual planting species and spacing and ultimately the landscaping plan approval shall coincide with building permit approval. Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.060(6), the following landscaping types and widths shall be provided: Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 4 Federal Way High School Replacement File 14-101058-UP/Doc I.D. 65295 Perimeter Type Width North N/A N/A East (along building foundation to meet design guidelines as detailed in item 5(e)iii above) 111 5 feet South III 5 feet West 1 15 feet Table 3 Perimeter Landscaping Requirements The southern perimeter buffer is proposed along the south building facade foundation. This will aid in the reduction of the overall bulk of the building and incorporate several existing mature trees that will be retained along South 308ffi Street frontage. Perimeter landscaping is also required along the southern frontage adjacent to the new bioswale near the existing stadium parking lot. No perimeter landscaping is required along the existing kitchen building as no improvements in the general area are proposed. The western perimeter requires Type I landscaping 15 feet in width due to the abutting residential zone. The preliminary landscape plan details the required buffer type and width along the southwestern portion of the boundary. The applicant has requested a modification to the type and width for the perimeter adjacent to the stormwater pond. The applicant has also requested to provide no landscaping along the northwestern portion of the property adjacent to the baseball field. Landscape Modification Decisions — The department approves the modification to increase the perimeter landscaping screen between the stormwater pond and western property line to 20-30 feet with a Type H landscaping screen consisting of a mix of deciduous, evergreen and existing mature trees in addition to shrubs and groundcover. This modification meets purpose statement and criteria set forth in FWRC 19.125.100. The result of the modified width/type in addition to the stormwater feature with its own landscaping will provide an actual screen width of 200 feet that consists of new trees, shrubs and groundcover that will be incorporated with several mature existing trees along the perimeter. Additionally, the stormwater feature will act as a publically assessable amenity with a traversing walking trail. The modified buffer, stormwater feature and additional planting will provide a superior result to the required 15-foot Type I screen as it: (1) provides a functioning buffer of up to 15 times what the code would require; and (2) the creative design component of incorporating the stormwater feature provides an actual accessible landscaped amenity as opposed to the typical gated detention facility. The department approves your request to forgo the perimeter landscaping requirement along the northwest perimeter adjacent to the baseball field. The applicant has stated that adjacent neighbors have encroached onto the subject property with fencing and their own landscaping. As a result of this encroachment, the applicant claims it does not have the space to provide the required landscaping. Staff finds this meets unique and special circumstance purpose criteria set forth in FWRC 19.125.100. The neighbors have established landscaping in their own backyards and areas encroaching into the subject property that provide an already functioning screen from the subject property. Staff finds there is no compelling reason to require the applicant to reclaim that portion of property along the western perimeter, remove the existing buffer landscaping and fencing, and then plant new landscaping. 2 No landscaping is required along the north and east perimeters as they are designated rear and side yards with 0-ft. setbacks. FWRC 19.125.040(28) does not require perimeter landscaping along lot lines abutting a ROW where no required yards apply. Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 5 Federal Way High School Replacement File 14-101058-UP/Doe. LD. 65295 Parking Lot Landscaping — Pursuant to 19.125.070, proposed improvements will require the need of at least 22 square feet (13,420sf total)3 of Type IV landscaping per parking space within landscape islands between 64 square feet and 305 square feet. Total provided interior lot landscaping surpasses 20,000sf and therefore exceeds the requirement. Review of the landscape plan has only verified the plan has noted the required landscaping type and provided the requisite square footage of planting within the parking lot. Review of the actual planting species and spacing and ultimately the landscaping plan approval shall coincide with building permit approval. The applicant requested a departure from the 305sf maximum island size for eight landscape islands to incorporate biofiltration swales. The departure is granted as it expressly meets the modification criteria set forth in FWRC 19.125.100. Additional landscape islands exceeding 305sf that are not associated with the biofiltration swales will be credited for only 305sf. 10. Tree Density — Pursuant to FWRC 19.120.130(5) standard tree densities require a minimum of one tree unit for each 500 square feet of building expansion (40,658sf)4 and a minimum of three tree units shall be provided for each tree unit removed. These two metrics for replacement would result in the applicant needing to replace tree units in excess of the underlying 20 tree unit per acre requirement for BC zones. Therefore, the applicant will be required to retain or replace tree densities to the underlying BC zone requirement for the subject property of 764 tree units.5 The proposed and existing total tree units provided onsite equals 770; which exceeds the underlying BC zone minimum. The tree survey identifies 396.5 tree units on the subject property. The tree retention plan proposes to retain 121 tree units. Proposed onsite planting within perimeters, parking lot and other areas will amount to 649 tree unit credits. 11. Off -Street Parking — Pursuant to Use Zone Chart 19.220.040, high school uses shall provide one parking space for each employee and one space for each 10 students. Parking lot design criteria for space and aisle width is based on standards in department bulletin #042 as set forth in FWRC 19.130.160(2). The 1,600 students and 120 employees will require a minimum of 280 parking spaces. The applicant has proposed 610 total parking spaces and therefore exceeds the minimum. Parking design generally meets criteria of bulletin #042. Stall dimensions for 90-degree spaces are 8.5 feet wide, 16.75 feet Iong' with 25.5 feet of aisle width. Stall dimensions for 60-degree spaces are 10 feet wide, 20.5 feet long with a 21-foot aisle. Wheel stops are included on most, but not all parking spaces. In order to avoid vehicle overhang into pedestrian walkways thereby reducing their efficacy, a condition of approval will be added to the decision to,require all parking stalls adjacent to pedestrian connections incorporate wheel stops or alternatively the connections shall be widened an additional two feet. 12. Transportation — The Public Works Traffic Division has determined the 21 new PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed high school replacement will not cause Level of Service (LOS) failures to the surrounding transportation system. All intersections impacted by one or more weekday evening 3 Applicant is providing 610 parking spaces. 4 This is the net gain in square footage from the existing building which contains 195,227sf of gross floor area as indicated by King County Assessor records and the proposed 235,885sf of the new building. 5 Acreage. of the site minus ROW dedication equals 38.2 acres. 6 Typical stall length is 18 feet. However, bulletin #042 and FWRC 19.125.070(6) allow vehicles up to two feet of overhang resulting in the reduction of stall. length of up to two feet. Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 6 Federal Way High School Replacement File 14-101058-UP/Doc. J.D. 65295 peak hour trips from the proposed development would meet city LOS standards with programmed improvements and as a result a Capacity Reserve Certificate was issued June 11, 2014. The proposed redevelopment is subject to transportation impact fees with credit given to the existing building. Impact fees will be due prior to building permit issuance. The project will have access onto South 304'b Street, South 308"' Street (two), and 16`h Ave. South. 13. Street Improvements — The aTplicant will construct right-of-way improvements along S. 304`b Street, 16t' Ave. S. and S. 308 Street as revised in the July 2, 2014, Right -of -Way Modification Decision to Ms. Ingrid Krueger issued by the Public Works Department. The building permit may be further conditioned to require street improvements are completed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 14. Clearing and Grading — Clearing and grading activities are consistent with applicable standards set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.120. Grading of the site will amount to approximately 64,000 cubic yards of cut and 18,000 cubic yards of fill to accommodate stormwater detention, athletic fields, parking and building pad. Finished grades will maintain the existing slope pattern from north to south and aid in stormwater collection/treatment. No retaining walls are anticipated as a result of the grading. 15. Cultural Resources — The department was notified by the Puyallup Tribe of Indians during the Notice of Application period that redevelopment of the subject property and its proximity to Cold Creek, Steel Lake and Redondo Beach posed a potential for impacting cultural resources. The city's Responsible Official utilized SEPA substantive authority to condition the DNS to require the applicant to submit a cultural resource assessment to the Puyallup Tribe and department, with determination of avoidance or mitigation based on the report, prior to issuance of any building or grading permit. The applicant has submitted the report prior to the issuance of the Use Process III decision. Based on findings of the report, archeological monitoring shall be incorporated into the construction specifications. 16. Tacoma Smelter Plume — The subject property is within the Tacoma Smelter Plume as identified by the state Department of Ecology (DOE). According to DOE, potential arsenic concentrations on the subject property may range from 20.lppm to 40ppm. The city's Responsible Official utilized SEPA substantive authority to condition the DNS to require the applicant to submit a soil sampling and cleanup report per the Tacoma Smelter Plume Model Remedies Guidance prior to issuance of a grading permit. The applicant has submitted an arsenic and lead investigation report that concludes there is no detectable arsenic or lead in soil samples collected at the site. The Tacoma Smelter Plume SEPA condition has been met. 17. Garbage & Recycling— Garbage and recycling space is provided within the screened service area along the north building elevation. Space requirements of 2sf per 1,000sf of gross floor area are exceeded. 18. Critical Areas — The subject property is within a 10-year Wellhead Protection Zone. No hazardous materials in amounts that would be detrimental to the protection area were identified on the inventory statement. As the proposed landscaped area will exceed 10,000 square feet, the applicant will be required to prepare a management manual using best management practices (BMPs) and integrated pest management (IPM) for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications. As a condition of approval, the manual will be required to be submitted with the building permit set. 19. Fire Protection — The South King Fire and Rescue District has indicated an automatic fire sprinkler and alarm system is required. Any needed fire hydrants shall be in service prior to and during the time Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 7 Federal Way High School Replacement File 14-101058-UP/nog. Ln. 65295 of construction. The building is required to have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within the building based upon the existing coverage levels of the public safety communication system at the exterior of the building. 20. Water and Sewer — The proposed location of the building may require the realignment of the onsite water main. Separate Developer Extension Agreements from the Lakehaven Utility District will be required for new and/or abandoned water facilities. The district has indicated the site contains six existing sewer service connections. Separate sewer connection permits are required from the district for any new connection or modification. 21. Building Phasing & Portables — The new building will be constructed in two phases. Phase I will consist of the demolition of the southern portion of the existing building. During Phase I, the existing shop, studio, music, dining and gymnasium will remain intact while south and east portions of the new building are constructed. Demolition of existing classrooms will require the district to install approximately 27 portable buildings for temporary classroom and restroom use. Phase II will consist of demolishing the shop, studio and music portion of the existing building and constructing the north wing of the building. The dining and gymnasium portion of the existing building will remain until the completion of Phase II of the building. The approximate duration of Phase I is Nov. 2014 to March 2016 and Phase II March 2016 to August 2017. 22. Public Comments —Two written comments were submitted during the 15-day comment period. Brandon Reynon of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians submitted a comment April 7, 2014, regarding the need for a cultural resource report. John Weise, of 30405 11 `h Ave. S., submitted a comment April 9, 2014, regarding traffic analysis. A follow-up email from the Traffic Division was forwarded to Mr. Weise on April 30, 2014. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Comprehensive Plan & Zoning — The subject property is within the Community Business (BC) comprehensive plan and zoning designations. The high school use is permitted within the BC zone pursuant to FWRC 19.220.040. 2. Site Plan Review Process —Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.030(3), the required review process for major improvements and additions to developed sites not exempt from an environmental threshold determination is Use Process III as set forth in FWRC Chapter 19.65. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) — The proposed improvements exceed categorical exemptions adopted by the city's environmental policy codified in FWRC 14.15.030(c) and therefore require an environmental threshold determination prior to any land use or building permit approval. The department issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) with conditions on May 15, 2014. Following review of the environmental checklist, the Responsible Official determined the proposal would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an Environmental Impact Statement would not be required. Using substantive authority granted under SEPA, The city's Responsible Official attached the following conditions to the DNS document to avoid probable adverse impacts that were not perceived to be significant: a. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit, the applicant shall submit a cultural resource assessment, prepared by a qualified professional, to the Community Development Department and Brandon Reynon of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians. Any needed mitigation Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 8 Federal Way High School Replacement File 14-101058 UP/Doc. I.D. 65295 and/or avoidance measures shall be designed based upon the results of the survey, in consultation with the Puyallup Tribe and Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation; and b. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a soil sampling and cleanup report per the Tacoma Smelter Plume Model Remedies Guidance. If soil contaminants are found to be elevated per the guidance, the applicant shall remedy the soils per the guidance as a component of the grading permit and then submit a written approval of cleanup (No Further Action) from the Department of Ecology following completion of the grading activities. The No Further Action document shall be submitted to the department prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant has submitted reports for each item prior to the issuance of the Use Process III decision. The applicant will be required to incorporate archeological monitoring into the construction specifications with the site contractor. No contamination was found related to the Tacoma Smelter Plume during the soil sampling and therefore no written approval from the Department of Ecology is required. 4. Stormwater Impacts — The proposed development meets criteria for full drainage review pursuant to FWRC 16.25.020(2)(b) and therefore must comply with core and special requirements of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and the Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM. The site is within Flood Problem Flow Control and Enhanced Basic Water Quality areas. The applicant has provided a preliminary overview of how the developed property will provide flow control and water quality treatment on new impervious surfaces. Further examination of the stormwater plans will be conducted by the Public Works Department during engineering review. 5. Public Notice — A combined Notice of Application and anticipated DNS was issued on the proposal on April 4, 2014, pursuant to Use Process III notice requirements set forth in FWRC 19.65.070. 6. Comprehensive Plan Consistency — The proposal is consistent with the following policies: a. LUP30 b. TP5 c. TP10 d. TP16 7. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of the Federal Way Revised Code — The Master Land Use application was reviewed and determined to be consistent under the following FWRC titles: Title 14 — Environmental Policy; Title 16 — Surface Water Management; and Title 19 — Zoning and Development Code. 8. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare — No adverse health, safety or welfare impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposal. The Use Process III application has been reviewed under SEPA; the FWCP; all applicable provisions of FWRC; and construction permit plans will be reviewed utilizing the current International Building Code. 9. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal — No significant adverse transportation impacts were identified by the City of Federal Way in the Concurrency analysis or DNS issued for the proposed action. Through the city's transportation concurrency management policy, the Traffic Division has determined no intersections will fail adopted level of service standards and the traffic impact fee will adequately Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 9 Federal way High School Replacement File 14-101058-UP/Doc. I.D. 65295 mitigate new trips associated with the upgraded facility. The applicant will construct to city standards, right-of-way improvements along S. 304" St., 16L Ave. S. and S. 308"' St. as indicated in the July 2, 2014, Right -of -Way Modification Decision issued by the Public Works Department. The city's water/sewer purveyor, Lakehaven Utility District, has indicated that sewer and water service currently serve the site and any needed extensions and/or modifications will require permitting through the district. 10. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration — Vehicular access to the property via S. 300 St., 16t' Ave. S., and S. 308'h St. are appropriately spaced and provide multiple points of ingress/egress. Sidewalks and internal pedestrian connections to the proposed building will provide safe pedestrian access to and from the development. 11. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated — The applicant will construct right-of-way improvements, which include street lighting and planter strips, per city standards. Marked pedestrian pathways from the street to the interior of the site will be provided. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following conditions of approval are attached to the Process III decision: 1. To reduce the impacts of vehicle overhang into adjacent pedestrian connections to the building, street, or parking lot, wheel stops shall be included on stalls adjacent to pedestrian walkways. Alternatively, the pedestrian walkways can be widened to 8 feet in width. 2. Generator, transformer and 10-foot enclosure shall not be located in 20-foot required yard along South 308t' St. A cut -sheet detailing this area that includes the generator, transformer, metal screen, and Type III landscaping screen shall be included with the building permit plan set in order to verify its placement in relation to the required front yard and review for Community Design Guideline compliance. 3. A final landscaping plan shall be submitted with the building permit set that includes species, size, quantity, spacing, etc. corresponding to the required landscaping type. Additionally, the plan shall incorporate a management manual using best management practices (BMPs) and integrated pest management (IPM) for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications as required by Wellhead Protection Zone regulations set forth in FWRC 19.185.070. 4. The applicant shall incorporate archeological monitoring into construction specifications, to the city's satisfaction, with the site contractor to ensure compliance with SEPA conditions. 5. A final photometric lighting plan that indicates the fixtures, height and footcandles shall be submitted with the building permit plan set. These findings shall not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. Prepared by: Matthew Herrera, AICP — Senior Planner Date: July 25, 2014 Statement of Findings and Conclusions Page 10 Federal Way High School Replacement File 14-101058-UP/Doc. I,D. 65295 CITY OF A�k Federal May 15, 2014 Chad Weiser Otak Inc 10230 NE Points Drive, Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Feder y Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #14-101058-00-UP; TECHNICAL COMMENT LETTER Federal Way High School, 30611 16`h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Weiser: City staff has completed the initial review of your Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application submittal package. Site improvements include the replacement of the Federal Way High School building, stormwater flow control/treatment, athletic fields, parking reconfiguration, right-of-way improvements, and landscaping. Unless otherwise noted, the following comments provided by staff reviewing your project must be addressed prior to issuing the administrative site plan decision. Please direct questions regarding any of the technical comments to the appropriate staff representative. Zoning and Land Use Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com 1. Exterior Lighting — The conceptual lighting plan indicates footcandle levels consistent with Illuminating Engineering Society minimum light levels for outdoor usage. A photometric lighting plan that includes footcandle measurements, luminaire schedule, and placement will be required as a component of the building permit set. Be advised that lighting fixtures are limited to 30 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. 2. Surface Parking — The following comments address off-street parking, landscaping, and Community Design Guidelines as they relate to surface parking. a. Quantity - FWRC 19.220.040 requires high schools to provide 1 parking space for each employee and 1 parking space for each 10 students. On the site plan, please provide a breakdown of the total number of students and employees, total number of required parking stalls, and total number of stalls provided. Parking in the right-of-way will not be credited to the minimum required. Additionally, please clarify the total number of stalls provided as the environmental checklist identifies 630 stalls and Sheet A000 identifies 608 stalls. b. Pedestrian Connections — Connections through the asphalt parking areas require a variation in paved texture and color. Approved methods include stone, brick or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, or stamped and colored concrete. Please provide material choice on resubmitted sheets. Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 2 Distances between delineated pedestrian routes exceed 300 feet in areas of the surface parking lot. Additional north/south pedestrian connections from the parking lot to the school building are needed to prevent cut -through of the landscape islands. See item c below. c. Landscaping — The maximum size of landscape islands within surface parking areas is 305 square feet. The civil sheets indicate the larger islands will be used as biofiltration swales but the landscaping indicates typical shrub and groundcover planting. If biofiltration swales are proposed staff will allow the modification to the 305 square -foot maximum if (1) additional north/south pedestrian connections are provided through the parking lot; (2) interpretive signage is placed around the proposed rain gardens that explain their function and purpose; and (3) the islands are clearly marked for biofiltration on the landscaping sheets. d. Space & Aisle Dimensions — Space and aisles appear not to coincide with design criteria in Bulletin #042. Please ensure that all dimensions meet the bulletin criteria and provide several call outs for space and aisle dimensions that meet the enclosed criteria in the east and south parking lots. 3. Building Height —The following comments address how height of structure is calculated, limitation on heights near residential zones, and criteria to exceed height permitted outright. a. Clarification of the height of structure will be needed. The elevation drawings indicate an Average Building Elevation (ABE) of 467 feet. Please show the proposed building footprint on a plan view with existing and proposed topographic elevations. A separate ABE is determined for each building facade. The ABEs for the total number of building facades is then averaged to determine an overall ABE for the entire building. Please provide ABE calculations on each facade and average for final ABE. b. There is a 30' height limitation for the building if it is within 100' of a residential zone. Please show the building heights along the south elevation and distances to the southern RM zoning district. c. Please address special regulations and notes from Use Zone Chart 19.220.040(2)a through d for discretionary consideration to exceed the 35-foot height limit. 4. Building Design & Pedestrian Amenities — The following comments address required yards and Community Design Guidelines. a. The 0-foot side -yard setback is intended to encourage buildings to interface with the street. As the east elevation is set back 20 feet from the sidewalk, a Type III landscaping strip 5 feet in width shall be added to the frontage or base of the building. b. Building elevations contain material identification numbers with no color. Please submit a color materials board or rendering with the full material titles. c. Building design generally meets institutional use criteria for roof design as the axonometric rendering details alternative distinctive roof forms that are stepped, curvilinear, and offset. Additionally, the design provides several alternative methods to organize and shape structural elements instead of providing the significant structural modulation called out in FWRC 19.115.100(3). Staff will consider the alternative method to satisfy guidelines if additional 14-101058 Doc 1 D 65474 Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 3 articulation is provided on the north elevation and additional pedestrian amenities are added to plaza areas at Pacific Hwy entrances as detailed below. d. Staff is concerned about the blank building walls on the north elevation. FWRC 19.125.040(22) states building walls which are uninterrupted by window, door, or other architectural feature(s) listed in the city's Community Design Guidelines, that are 240 square feet or greater in area, shall be screened by landscaping. FWRC 19.115.060(3)(b) provides a nonexclusive list of methods to articulate blank walls. e. Other than trash receptacles, no pedestrian amenities or streetscape elements are shown in the plaza areas on the two east building entrances. Seating, raised planters, wayfinding, and pedestrian level lighting are examples of elements that may satisfy plaza design requirements. 5. Fencing — Metal wire panel fencing is shown on the west elevation. FWRC 19.115.090(l)(f) requires such fencing to contain vinyl -coated mesh, powder -coated poles, dark color(s), and architectural element(s) such as pole caps and/or decorative grid pattern. Perimeter Landscaping — Sheet L103 states, in part, "20' to 30' wide tree, shrub and groundcover planted with vegetated detention pond in lieu of Type I Solid Screen." Staff would consider a modification of the 15' Type I landscaping screen required for this portion of the perimeter if the overall intent of screening the non-residential use from the adjacent residential zone is met. In order to approve this modification with the Use Process III decision please provide a cross section and plan view of the area with proposed plantings that detail a solid screen similar to the Type I standards. Plans should be clearly labeled "Landscape Modification Plan" in the title block and clearly delineate and identify deviations requested. Type I landscaping shown on the western perimeter appears to be a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees spaced single file similar to a Type III screen and not the triangular method as shown in the plan and section view below. The final landscape plan will need to reflect the graphic and if deciduous trees are utilized a cedar fence will need to be installed (if not existing already) along the property line. 7. Tree Canopy Retention/Replacement — The expansion of existing uses subsection of the city's tree retention and replacement regulations apply to the proposed high school replacement. Please clarify the following discrepancies in the tree unit calculation breakdown on sheet L100. a. Please provide the net site acreage (gross acreage minus dedicated ROWS) in the tree unit calculation breakdown on sheet L100. 14-101058 Doc I D 65474 Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 4 b. FWRC 19.120.130(5)(a) requires 1 tree unit be provided for each 500 square feet of building expansion or new construction. Sheet L100 indicates 47 tree units are provided for expansion. King County Assessor records indicate the existing building is 195,227sf and the Master Land Use application proposes the replacement building at 232,000sf for a net gain of 36,773sf of new construction. One tree unit for each 500 square feet of 36,773sf of net new construction is 74 tree units. Please provide the breakdown with the equation on the corrected sheet. c. FWRC 19.120.130(5)(b) requires a minimum of 3 tree units be provided for each tree unit removed, up to a maximum of 25 tree units per acre. Sheet L100 indicates 146 trees to be removed but the breakdown does not provide the total number of units associated with the trees slated for removal. Please provide the total number of tree units proposed for removal in the calculation with the required replacement value. Replacement tree units in excess of the underlying BC zone minimum of 20 units per acre will not be required. d. Off -site mitigation is provided as an option if the minimum required tree units cannot be provided onsite. Please refer to FWRC 19.120.140(1) for offsite planting order of priority. e. Tree protection measures set forth in FWRC 19.120.160 shall be shown on the final landscape and grading plans. 8. Rooftop Appurtenances — HVAC and elevator equipment is not shown on elevation sheets or axonometric renderings. Such appurtenances must be surrounded by a solid sight -obscuring screen that is integrated into the architecture of the building and shielded from view from adjacent streets and properties. Please provide concept screening that will be utilized and meets the above -referenced criteria. 9. Garbage Enclosure — Please provide garbage enclosure design and space allocation per the following requirements set forth in FWRC 19.125.150: a. The design of the enclosure is consistent with the architectural design of the building. Chain link fencing with slat covering is not acceptable. b. Gate openings are at least 12 feet wide. c. Recycling storage is provided at a rate of two square feet of storage space for every 1,000 square feet gross floor area. 10. Retaining Wall — Rockeries and retaining walls are limited to 6 feet in height and must be composed of rock, brick, or other textured/patterned wall style. Please provide bottom and top of wall elevations and exterior finish material. Stormwater and Engineering Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, kevin.peterson(@ciVoffederalwgy_com 1. The engineer shall review (and revise as necessary) the flow control and water quality sizing calculations provided in the Preliminary TIR: Sections of the TIR (specifically KCRTS Time Series input file printouts for water quality) indicate input files from a different project (i.e., the input file page headings call out `13`h Avenue South', `S 332nd St', etc.) which don't coincide with streets 14-101058 Doc 1 D 65474 Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 5 associated with this project. Because of this discrepancy, I'm concerned that potentially all of the information in that section of the TIR was copied from another project, and may be incorrect as it applies to this project. 2. Show the required street improvements within the 16t' Ave S right-of-way, along the property frontage, or submit a formal request to modify or waive those improvements. 3. Show the required street improvements within the S 308`h St right-of-way, along the entire project frontage, to extend to Pacific Highway South, or submit a formal request to modify or waive those improvements. 4. If the applicant wishes to request a modification or waiver of the required improvements, the request shall comply with the City's `Right -of -Way Improvement Modification Request' handout. The Public Works Director will make the final determination on all requests to modify or waive the required improvements. 5. 'FWRC 11.05.110 Rebuilds, replacements and additions' requires that existing overhead utilities be located underground along the street frontages, as follows: "A relocation necessitated by a public works project including but not limited to, road realignment, widening or sewer and water main projects, a major rebuild, or replacement of existing aerial facilities (three or more spans and/or 500 feet or more) shall be underground and a permit from the city public works department shall be required; except undergrounding shall not be required in those cases where the public works director finds that undergrounding will not be in the best interest of the public. " Because the existing overhead utility poles on 304'h and 308ffi would need to be re -located in order to construct the required street improvements, the overhead utilities along those sections shall be re -located underground. 6. The street cross -sections provided on Sheets C5.0 and C6.0 do not meet the City's standards for our planned street section `R', which requires 4-foot planter strips and 6-foot sidewalks. 7. Provide 2 cross -sections (at 90 degrees to each other) of the proposed detention facility. One section shall include the pond inlet, outlet, and outlet control and overflow structures. Transportation Erik Preston, 253-835-2744, erik.preston(a)cilyoffederalwLay.com 1. Based on the submitted materials for a 232,000 square feet high school building and credit for an existing 195,227 sq. ft. building, the estimated traffic impact fee is $95,735. Please note, the actual impact fee will be calculated based on the fee schedule in effect at the time a building permit application is filed and must be paid prior to permit issuance. 2. The street cross -sections provided on Sheets C5.0 and C6.0 for S 304`h Street and S 308 Street do not match the City's standards for our planned Type-R street section, which requires 4-foot planter strips and 6-foot sidewalks. 3. Widen the sidewalk on S 308 Street near Pacific Highway from the western driveway through the eastern driveway so the back of sidewalk is 10 feet from the face of curb (matching Type R cross- section) or to 12 feet from face -of -curb to match the existing sidewalk to the west. (Sheet C4.44) 14-101058 Doc I D 65474 Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 6 4. Show the required street improvements and right-of-way dedication for 16'h Avenue S along the property frontage, or submit a formal request to modify or waive those improvements. The planned cross-section for this street is also Type-R which requires 4-foot planter strips, 6-foot sidewalks, and on -street parking. 5. The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements (FWRC 19.135.070). Information about right-of-way modification requests is available through the Public Works Development Services Division. Please note that these modification requests have a nominal review fee. 6. The pavement width for the north driveway opening on S 300 Street (Sheet C4.14) should be widened to 30 feet. The pavement width should then taper down to the 24-foot width described. Revise the current plan which shows a 22-foot-wide driveway. Water/Sewer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District, 253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org Applicant has not completed and submitted to Lakehaven an application for Certificate(s) of Availability. Applicant has submitted to Lakehaven a Developer Pre -Design application on 3/22/13, and Lakehaven issued Developer Pre -Design comments to the applicant on 4/9/13. Applicant has not yet submitted a Developer Extension Agreement for Lakehaven to formally commence the water and/or sewer plan review process. Lakehaven encourages owners/devel_opers/appl_icants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. APPLICATION STATUS The review period for the Use Process application has stopped and the application is on hold until requested items are resubmitted. When resubmitting requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, four copies of corrected reports, and six copies of corrected full size plans with the enclosed resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The FWRC can be reviewed in its entirety athtti2://www.codel2ublishin&.com/wa/federalw 1. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincere' , a ew Herrera, AICP Senior Planner enc: Bulletin 042 `Parking Lot Design Criteria' Bulletin 129 `Resubmittal Information' c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 14-101058 Doc 1 D 65474 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 20, 2014 TO: Kevin Peterson, Development Services Erik Preston, Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Matt Herrera — Planning COMMENTS. You guys know the drill. They're in a hurry; we need to expedite, etc. FILE NUMBER(s): RELATED FILE NOS.: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT ADDRESS ZONING DISTRICT.- 14-101058-00-UP None FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL 30611 16TH AVE S PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Replacement of existing high school with new 232,000sf building and associated site improvements. LAND USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT. Use Process III OTAK INC CHADWEISER 10230 POINTS DR 400 MATERIALS RESUBMITTED: 1. Revised civils, archs and landscape sheets 2. Revised exterior material board 3. Revised TIR i Memorandum June 18, 2014 SRG SRG PARTNERSHIP, INC 621 SW MORRISON, SUITE 200 PORTLAND. OREGON 97205 503 222 1917 110 UNION STREET, SUITE 300 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 206 973 1700 PROJECT NAME: Federal Way High School TO: Matt Herrera City of Federal Way RESUBMITTED JUN 19 2014 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS REVISED DATE: June 18, 2014 FROM: Ingrid Krueger SUBJECT: City of Federal Way Process III Technical Comments Response DISTRIBUTION. SRGPARTNERSHIPCOM ATTACHMENTS: Process III Technical Comments051514 FWHS ROW Modification Memo SRG PROJECT NO: 212023 Matt, The following represent our responses to the Process III Technical comments: Zoning and Land US 1. A photometric lighting plan that includes footcandle measurements, luminaire schedule and placement with be included in permit submission. 2. Surface Parking a. A tabulation of required parking based on number of occupants has been added to the site plan sheet A000. The correct number of stalls provided is 610. b. The crosswalks connecting the concrete pedestrian walks through the parking lot will be scored concrete to differentiate these pedestrian surfaces from the vehicular asphalt. This has been updated in the revised landscape drawings. The walkways within the parking lot area are shown as scored concrete to differentiate pedestrian surfaces from the vehicular asphalt. The asphalt paths shown on the west edges of the northern parking and southern parking lots are separated from the vehicular asphalt by a concrete vertical curb, which provides the differentiation/separate of pedestrian and vehicular areas. c. The parking islands exceed the maximum parking island size in order to accommodate storm water swales. The planting in these swales has been revised to be grasses. The pedestrian connections through the parking lot have been updated to include clear Page 1 of 5 MEMORANDUM path of travel through the parking. A note that educational signage will be included for the storm water swales has been added (as #12) to the Landscape Notes on L100. The storm water swales are noted on the revised landscape drawings. d. -Please see revised Civil plans for clarifying notes and dimensions. 3. Building Height a. See Building Height Plan sheet A001 for ABE and Building Height calculations. b. See Building Height Plan sheet A001 for ABE and Building Height calculations and distances to the southern RM Zone. c. The building is in compliance with allowable heights as follows: ■ Use Zone Chart 19.220.040(2)a: The three-story structure allows for a compact building footprint, which is more effective from an operational and security approach, as well as limiting the amount of impervious surface on the site. All ground floor spaces have floor -to -floor height of 14' or greater and a minimum depth of 15'. ■ Use Zone Chart 19.220.040(2)b: Building height does not exceed 30 ft. AABE when located within 100 ft. of a residential zone. ■ Use Zone Chart 19.220.040(2)c: Height over 35 ft. is set back from non-residential zones by greater than one ft. for each one ft. of height over 35 ft. ■ Use Zone Chart 19.220.040(2)d: Roof lines are designed to avoid a predominantly flat and featureless appearance through variations in roof height, forms, and materials. 4. Building Design & Pedestrian Amenities a. The planting shown on the east side of the building will satisfy the 5' Type III requirement, and has been noted as such on the revised landscape drawings. The easement and utilities along this side of the building limit the ability to plant trees; this is noted as well. b. A color & material sheet was included with the submittal package. The elevations reference this drawing. An updated color & material sheet is included with this re - submittal. c. See response to item 4.d below. d. A landscape area, which includes evergreen trees and shrubs, is located directly in front of the north wall of the gym, in order to provide screening not only for this mostly blank wall, but also to define an area of restricted access to the loading dock. In order to maintain the ability to supervise this area, the school district desires that it be somewhat visible from the parking lot, therefore a solid landscape screen is not appropriate. Type III screening has been added where feasible along the north building elevation, per the revised landscape drawings. A Site Section is also included on sheet A002 in the re -submittal package, to clarify the view of this wall from the adjacent properties to the north and its relationship to Pacific Highway. e. Benches have been added to the building entry plaza areas on the southeast and northeast corners of the building. 5. The code section cited refers to locations where "chain link fence" will be used. The fencing indicated here is intended to be an architectural fence, not chain link. Details will be included in the permit submittal. Page 2 of 5 MEMORANDUM 6. There are three separate conditions along the west property line that have been discussed with the City reviewer in detail. We propose the following conditions to meet the intent of the Type I Solid Screen landscape treatment: • The southern portion of the west property line that is adjacent to the existing stadium parking lot will have a complete 15' wide Type I landscape screen. This has been updated in the revised landscape drawings. • The middle portion that is adjacent to the detention pond will have a 20' to 30' Type 11 visual screen condition that incorporates both deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs. While this will not be a full sight -obscuring screen for the adjacent properties, the pond is a greater visual amenity than a Type I screen would provide, and the proposed Type II screen width provided is much greater than prescribed 15' width. • The northern portion adjacent to the baseball field consists of a densely vegetated encroachment zone maintained by the adjacent residential properties owners. This zone is defined by the existing FWHS fence that varies from 15' to 31' east of the property line. FWPS proposes that they project does not make improvements on the west side of the fence, since it would adversely impact the vegetated areas that under the care of the adjacent property owners. 7. Tree Canopy Retention/Replacement a. The Tree Unit Calculations have been updated to show gross and net acreage of the site. b. Per our discussions with the City Reviewer, it was clarified that the required tree unit count may not exceed the underlying BC zoning requirement of 20 tree units per acre. Calculated with the Net Acreage, the minimum tree unit count equals 764. The combined total of 3:1 replacement of tree units removed (826.5) plus the required tree units for building expansion (1 tree unit per 500 square feet of expansion = 74) equals 900.5, which exceeds the minimum required by the underlying zoning. Therefore, the calculation only shows the required tree unit count based on the underlying zoning. c. See response to 7.b. d. We have increased the number of proposed tree units on site to meet the minimum requirements. This has been updated in the revised landscape drawings. e. Tree protection measures will be noted and shown as appropriate in the final landscape and civil plans. The requirements are currently noted on L120. 8. Elevator equipment is integrated into the building and will not be visible above the roof. Elevations have been updated to clarify locations of HVAC equipment and associated screens. An updated color & material sheet is included with this re -submittal to indicate the intended screening material. 9. Garbage and recycling containers are intended to be stored inside the service yard. This garbage storage area is not visible from the right -of way, since it is enclosed by the building on three sides. The fourth side is open to provide easy access from the parking and service drive. A note has been added to Site Plan sheet A000 for clarification. a. In order to maintain the ability to supervise this area, the school district desires that it be somewhat visible from the parking lot, therefore a solid screen is not appropriate. The fencing indicated here is intended to be an architectural fence (not chain link). The material will match the mechanical screening material at the roof. An updated color & material sheet is included with this re -submittal to indicate the intended fence material. Details will be included in the permit submittal. Page 3 of 5 MEMORANDUM b. The yard is open on one side, with no gate, for ease of operations. c. A calculation has been added to the site plan indicating the required and provided area. 10. The concrete retaining walls on the east side of the building are no longer needed and have been removed from the revised landscape plans. The height of the rock wall at the SW coner of the site (in the Stadium parking lot) has been added to the Grading and Paving plans. Stormwater and Engineering 1. Report calculations have been updated. 2. The project proposes deferring the ROW improvement requirements at 16th Avenue, until such time as may allow for a process to vacate the street. See FWHS_ ROW Modification Memo. 3. The project proposes to modify the ROW improvement requirements at South 308th Street. See FWHS ROW Modification Memo. 4. See items 2 and 3 described above and FWHS ROW Modification Memo. 5. No existing power poles need to be relocated to construct proposed ROW improvements. Discussion for overhead power to remain occurred with utility and CoFW representatives in meetings fall of 2013 and again specifically on December 12, 2013. See 12/12/13 minutes attached. See also discussion under response to items 2 and 3 above. As discussed previously, undergrounding will not be in the best interest of the public, since the existing utility poles can easily be accommodated by enhancing the required ROW improvements as described above. Without impact to existing overhead power spans, required sidewalks, required roadway widths for vehicular movements, and a more functional planter strip will be provided. 6. See items 2 and 3 described above. Discussion to modify or defer improvements occurred in 2013 meetings as noted. Curb locations and sidewalk widths meet prescribed Type R requirements. A more functional planter strip exceeding the 4' minimum is provided (planter strip width of 6' along 308th and 5' along 304th). 7. Cross sections are included with this re -submittal on sheet C4.45. Transportation 1. Comment noted. 2. See Stormwater and Engineering items 2 and 3 described above, and FWHS— ROW Modification Memo. Discussion to modify or defer improvements occurred in 2013 meetings as noted. Curb locations and sidewalk widths meet prescribed Type R requirements. A more functional planter strip exceeding the 4' minimum is provided (planter strip width of 6' along 308th and 5' along 304th). 3. See Stormwater and Engineering item 3 described above, and FWHS— ROW Modification Memo. At S 308th Street east of 14th Avenue, the current road section and curb location is proposed to remain as it exists today, without changes, and was discussed and agreed 12/12/2013. 4. See Stormwater and Engineering item 2 response described above, and FWHS_ ROW Modification Memo. 5. See Stormwater and Engineering items 2 and 3 described above, and FWHS— ROW Modification Memo. Discussion to modify or defer improvements occurred in past meetings as noted — please accept these responses as written requests. 6. Revised driveway apron is shown on sheet C4.14 and C5.3 of this re -submittal package. Page 4 of 5 MEMORANDUM 7. The width has been revised to 30 feet. Twenty two foot pavement width indicated is adequate for two-way passenger vehicle traffic expected to use this access point, and is proposed in order to minimize pollution -generating surfaces and provide traffic calming. Water/Sewer Comments noted. END OF MEMORANDUM Page 5 of 5 CIT CITY OF Federal Way333 HALL A.8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway cam May 15, 2014 OW ' Inc. MAY 19 2014 Chad Weiser Otak Inc 10230 NE Points Drive, Suite 400 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: File #14-101058-00-UP; TEGUNICAL COMMENT LETTER Federal Way High School, 30611 :16"' Avenue South, Federal Way, Dear Mr. Weiser: City staff has completed the initial review of your Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application submittal package. Site improvements include the replacement of the Federal Way High School building, stormwater flow control/treatment, athletic fields, parking reconfiguration, right-of-way improvements, and landscaping. Unless otherwise noted, the following comments provided by staff reviewing your project must be addressed prior to issuing the administrative site plan decision. Please direct questions regarding any of the technical comments to the appropriate staff representative. Zoning and Land Use Matthew Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com 1. Exterior Lighting — The conceptual lighting plan indicates footcandle levels consistent with Illuminating Engineering Society minimum light levels for outdoor usage. A photometric lighting plan that includes footcandle measurements, luminaire schedule, and placement will be required as a component of the building permit set. Be advised"that lighting fixtures are limited to 30 feet in height and shall include cutoff shields. 2. Surface Parking —The following comments address off-street parking, landscaping, and Community Design Guidelines as they relate to surface parking. a. Quantity - FWRC 19.220.040 requires high schools to provide 1 parking space for each employee and 1 parking space for each 10 students. On the site plan, please provide a breakdown of the total number of students and employees, total number of required parking stalls, and total number of stalls provided. Parking in the right-of-way will not be credited to the minimum required. Additionally, please clarify the total number of stalls provided as the environmental checklist identifies 630 stalls and Sheet A000 identifies 608 stalls. b. Pedestrian Connections -- Connections through the asphalt parking areas require a variation in paved texture and color. Approved methods include stone, brick or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, or stamped and colored concrete. Please provide material choice on resubmitted sheets. Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 2 Distances between delineated pedestrian routes exceed 300 feet in areas of the surface parking lot. Additional north/south pedestrian connections from the parking lot to the school building are needed to prevent cut -through of the landscape islands. See item c below. c. Landscaping —The maximum size of landscape islands within surface parking areas is 305 square feet. The civil sheets indicate the larger islands will be used as biofiltration swales but the landscaping indicates typical shrub and groundcover planting. If biofiltration swales are proposed staff will allow the modification to the 305 square -foot maximum if (1) additional north/south pedestrian connections are provided through the parking lot; (2) interpretive signage is placed around the proposed rain gardens that explain their function and purpose; and (3) the islands are clearly marked for biofiltration on the landscaping sheets. d. Space & Aisle Dimensions — Space and aisles appear not to coincide with design criteria in Balletin #042. Please ensure that all dimensions meetthe bulletin criteria and provide several call outs for space and aisle dimensions that meet the enclosed criteria in the east and south parking lots. 3. Building Height — The following comments address how height of structure is calculated, limitation on heights near residential zones, and criteria to exceed height permitted outright. a. Clarification of the height of structure will be needed. The elevation drawings indicate an Average Building Elevation (ABE) of 467 feet. Please show the proposed building footprint on a plan view with existing and proposed topographic elevations. A separate ABE is determined for each building facade. The ABEs for the total number of building facades is then averaged to determine an overall ABE for the entire building. Please provide ABE calculations on each facade and average for final ABE. b. There is a 30' height limitation for the building if it is within 100' of a residential zone. Please show the building heights along the south elevation and distances to the southern RM zoning district. c. Pldasa address special regulations and notes from Use Zone Chart 19.220.040(2)a through d for discretionary consideration to exceed the 35-foot height limit. 4. Building Design & Pedestrian Amenities — The following comments address required yards and CommunityDesign Guidelines. a. The 0-foot side -yard setback is intended to encourage buildings to interface with the street. As the east elevation is set back 20 feet from the sidewalk, a Type III landscaping strip 5 feet in width shall be added to the frontage or base of the building. b. Building elevations contain material identification numbers with no color. Please submit a color materials board or rendering with the full material titles. c. Building design generally meets institutional use criteria for roof design as the axonometric rendering details alternative distinctive roof forms that are stepped, curvilinear, and offset. Additionally, the design provides several alternative methods to organize and shape structural elements instead of providing the significant structural modulation called out in FVIWRC 19.115.100(3). Staff will consider the alternative metbod to satisfy guidelines if additional 14401058 Doc ID 65474 Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 3 articulation is provided on the north elevation and additional pedestrian amenities are added to plaza areas at Pacific Hwy entrances as detailed below. d. Staff is concerned about the blank building walls on the north elevation. FWRC 19.125.040(22) states building walls which are uninterrupted by window, door, or other architectural feature(s) listed in the city's Community Design Guidelines, that are 240 square feet or greater in area, shall be screened by landscaping. FWRC 19.115.060(3)(b) provides a nonexclusive list of methods to articulate blank walls. e. Other than trash receptacles, no pedestrian amenities or streetscape elements are shown in the plaza areas on the two east building entrances: Seating, raised planters, wayfinding, and pedestrian level lighting are examples of elements that may satisfy plaza design requirements. 5. Fencing —Metal wire panel fencing is shown on the west elevation. FWRC 19.115.090(1)(f) requires such fencing to contain vinyl -coated mesh, powder -coated poles, dark color(s), and architectural element(s) such as pole caps and/or decorative grid pattern. 6. Perimeter Landscaping — Sheet L103 states, in part, "20' to 30' wide tree, shrub and groundcover planted with vegetated detention pond in lieu of Type 1 Solid Screen." Staff would consider a modification of the 15' Type I landscaping screen required for this portion of the perimeter if the overall intent of screening the non-residential use from the adjacent residential zone is met. In order to approve this modification with the Use -Process III decision please provide a cross section and plan view of the area with proposed plantings that detail a solid screen similar to the Type I standards. Plans should be clearly labeled "Landscape Modification Plan" in the title block and clearly delineate and identify deviations requested. Type I landscaping shown on the western perimeter appears to be a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees spaced single file similar to a Type III screen and not the triangular method as shown in the plan and section view below. The final landscape plan will need to reflect the graphic and if deciduous trees are utilized a cedar fence will need to be installed (if not existing already) along the property line. 7. Tree Canopy Retention/Replacement — The expansion of existing uses subsection of the city's tree retention and replacement regulations apply to the proposed high school replacement. Please clarify the following discrepancies in the tree unit calculation breakdown on sheet L100. a. Please provide the net site acreage (gross acreage minus dedicated ROWs) in the tree unit calculation breakdown on sheet L100. 14-101058 Doe. I.D. 65474 Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 4 b. FWRC 19.120.130(5)(a) requires 1 tree unit be provided for each 500 square feet of building expansion or new construction. Sheet L100 indicates 47 tree units are provided for expansion. King County Assessor records indicate the existing building is 195,227sf and the Master Land Use application proposes the replacement building at 232,000sf for a net gain of 36,773sf of new construction. One tree unit for each 500 square feet of 36,773sf of net new construction is 74 tree units. Please provide the breakdown with the equation on the corrected sheet. c. FWRC 19.120.130(5)(b) requires a minimum of 3 tree units be provided for each tree unit removed, up to a maximum of 25 tree units per acre. Sheet L100 indicates 146 trees to be removed but the breakdown does not provide the total member of units associated with the trees slated for removal. Please provide the total number of tree units proposed for removal in the calculation with the required replacement value. Replacement tree units in excess of the underlying BC zone minimum of 20 units per acre will not be required. d. Off -site mitigation is provided as an option if the minimum required tree units cannot be provided onsite. Please refer to FWRC 19.120.140(1) for offsite planting order of priority. e. Tree protection measures set forth in FWRC 19.120.160 shall be shown on the final landscape and grading plans. 8. Rooftop Appurtenances —%MAC and elevator equipment is not shown on elevation sheets or axonometric renderings. Such appurtenances must be surrounded by a solid sight -obscuring screen that is integrated into the architecture of the building and shielded from view from adjacent streets and properties. Please provide concept screening that will be utilized and meets the above -referenced criteria. 9. Garbage Enclosure — Please provide garbage enclosure design and space allocation per the following requirements set forth in FWRC 19.125.150: a. The design of the enclosure is consistent with the architectural design of the building. Chain lints fencing with slat covering is not acceptable. b. Gate openings are at least 12 feet wide. c. Recycling storage j5 provided at a rate of wo.square feet of storage space*for every 1,000 square feet gross floor area. 10. Retaining Wall — Rockeries and retaining walls are limited to 6 feet in height and must be composed of rock, brick, or other textured/patterned wall style. Please provide bottom and top of wall elevations and exterior finish material. Stormwater and Engineering Kevin Peterson, 253-835-2734, kevin.petersoii@cilyoffederalway.con 1. The engineer shall review (and revise as necessary) the flow control and water quality sizing calculations provided in the Preliminary TIR: Sections of the TIR (specifically KCRTS Time Series input file printouts for water quality) indicate input files from a different project (i.e., the input file page headings call out `13 h Avenue South', `S 332nd St', etc.) which don't coincide with streets 14-101056 Doe. I.D. 65474 Mr. Weiser May 15, 201 4 Page 5 associated with this project. Because of this discrepancy, I'm concerned that potentially all of the information in that section of the TIR was copied from another project, and may be incorrect as it applies to this project. 2. Show the required street improvements within the 161b Ave S right-of-way, along the property frontage, or submit a formal request to modify or waive those improvements. 3. Show the required street improvements within the S 3Oe' St right-of-way, along the entire project frontage, to extend to Pacific Highway South, or submit a formal request to modify or waive those improvements. 4. If the applicant wishes to request a modification or waiver of the required improvements, the request shall comply with the City's `Right -of -Way Improvement Modification Request' handout. The Public - Wofks'Director will make the fina: determination on all requests to modify or waive the, required improvements_ 5. `FWRC 11.05.110 Rebuilds, replacements and additions' requires that existing overhead utilities be located underground along the street frontages, as follows: "A relocation necessitated by a public works project including, but not limited to, road realignment, widening or sewer and water main projects, a major rebuild, or replacement of existing aerial facilities (three or more spans and/or 500 feet or more) shall be underground and a permit from the city public works department shall be required, except undergrounding shall not be required in those cases where the public works director finds that undergrounding will not be in the best interest of the public. " Because the existing overhead utility poles on 300 and 3081h would need to be relocated in order to construct the required street improvements, the overhead utilities along those sections shall be re -located underground. 6. The street cross -sections provided on Sheets C5.0 and C6.0 do not meet the City's standards for our planned street section `R', which requires 4-foot planter strips and 6-foot sidewalks. 7. Provide 2 cross -sections (at 90 degrees to each other) of the proposed detention facility. One section shall include the pond inlet, outlet, and outlet control and overflow structures. Transportation - Erik -Preston, 253-835-2744,,enk.=,stonQciiy-pffedera way.com 1. Based on the submitted materials for a 232,000 square feet high school building and credit for an existing 195,227 sq. ft. building, the estimated traffic impact fee is $95,735. Please note, the actual impact fee will be calculated based on the fee schedule in effect at the time a building permit application is filed and must be paid prior to permit issuance. 2. The street cross -sections provided on Sheets C5.0 and C6.0 for S 304'h Street and S 308 Street do not match the City's standards for our planned Type-R street section, which requires 4-foot planter strips and 6-foot sidewalks. 3. Widen the sidewalk on S 308 Street near Pacific Highway from the western driveway through the eastern driveway so the back of sidewalk is 10 feet from the face of curb (matching Type R cross- section) or to 12 feet from face -of -curb to match the existing sidewalk to the west. (Sheet C4.44) 14-101058 Doc- 1D. 65474 Mr. Weiser May 15, 2014 Page 6 4. Show the required street improvements and right-of-way dedication for 16"i Avenue S along the property frontage, or submit a formal request to modify or waive those improvements. The planned cross-section for this street is also Type-R which requires 4-foot planter strips, 6-foot sidewalks, and on -street parking. 5. The applicant may make a written request to the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the required street improvements (FWRC 19.135.070). Information about right-of-way modification requests is available through the Public Works Development Services Division. Please note that these modification requests have a nominal review fee. 6. The pavement width for the north driveway opening on S 304a` Street (Sheet C4.14) should be widened to 30 feet. The pavement width should then taper down to the 24-foot width described. Revise the current plan which shows a 22-foot-wide driveway. Water/Sewer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District, 253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org Applicant has not completed and submitted to Lakehaven an application for Certificate(s) of Availability. Applicant has submitted to Lakehaven a Developer Pre -Design application on 3/22/13, and Lakehaven issued Developer Pre -Design comments to the applicant on 4/9/13. Applicant has not yet submitted a Developer Extension Agreement for Lakehaven to formally commence the water and/or sewer plan review process. Lakehaven encourages owners/developers/applicants to apply for Lakehaven processes separately to Lakehaven, and sufficiently early in the pre-design/planning phase to avoid delays in overall project development. APPLICATION STATUS The review period for the Use Process application has stopped and the application is on hold until requested items are resubmitted. When resubmitting requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, four copies of corrected reports, and six copies of corrected full size plans with the enclosed resubmittal form. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed void. The FWRC can be reviewed in its entirety athft://www.codMublishing.condwa/federalw . If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerel at ew Herrera, AICP Senior Planner enc: Bulletin 042 `Parking Lot Design Criteria' c: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Bulletin 129 `Resubmittal Information' Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer 14-101058 Doc. 1D. 65474 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 13, 2014 TO: Ann Dower, Development Services Rick Perez, Traffic Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: Matt Herrera—PlanningD,ivison FOR DRC MTG. ON: March 27, 2014 — Internal Completeness & Preliminary Review FILE NUMBER(s): 14-101058-00-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: 13-101307-PC; 14-101059-SE; and 14-101060-CN PROJECT NAME: FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL PROJECTADDRESS: 30611 16TH AVE S ZONING DISTRICT.- BC PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of existing high school with new 232,000sf building and associated site improvements. LAND USE PERMITS: Process III, SEPA, and Concurrency PROJECT CONTACT: OTAK INC CHADWEISER 10230 POINTS DR Suite 400 Kirkland, WA MATERIALS SUBMITTED: 1. Signed MLU application 2. UPIII Submittal Checklist 3. Design Narrative 4. Site Photos (8) 5. Relief Aerial (8) 6. Access Points Aerial (8) 7. Lighting Plan (8) 8. Environmental Checklist (8) 9. Preliminary TIR (4) 10. Traffic Impact Analysis (4) 11. CPTED Checklist (4) 12. Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement (4) 13. Mailing Envelopes and Parcel Map (2-sets) 14. Survey Sheets (8) 15. Civil Sheets (8) 16. Architectural Sheets (8) 17. Landscape Sheets (8) Memorandum March 7, 2014 SRG SRG PARTNERSHIP, INC PROJECT NAME: Federal Way High School Matt Herrera 62-1 SbV M01-iRISON, SUITE 200 PORTLANL), C)RECoN 97205 City of Federal Way 5032221917 SUBJECT: Community Design Guideline Compliance 110 Ur1!0N STREET S0I1E'3100 t[Z;ILL.Vi6HINGTOr19810" DISTRIBUTION: 206973 .700 ,RGPARTINErSHIPCOr0 ATTACHMENTS: Exterior Axonometric Views RECEIVED LIAR 10 2014 cm OF FEDERAL WAy CDS REVISED DATE March 7, 2014 FROM: Ingrid Krueger, SRG SRG PROJECT NO: 212023 The following narrative addresses compliance with all applicable design guidelines per FWRC 19.115. Site Design The following goals have been utilized in the design of the campus, under the overarching goal "Make A Place: Design A Campus, Not Just A School:" • PROVIDE SECURITY AND SAFETY THROUGH PASSIVE MEASURES • PROVIDE VISIBILITY TO THE COMMUNITY • CREATE CLEAR HIERARCHY OF SITE ORGANIZATION • PLAN WITH EXISTING NATURAL FEATURES • PLAN FOR THE FUTURE The site plan expresses the objective of developing a cohesive campus environment that fosters educational innovation and community engagement and increases the existing sense of place within Federal Way. Tree Protection The landscape site plan identifies trees for preservation, ranging from a grove of Madrona, iconic Northwest native trees, to maturing Beech trees that can be expected to live for up to 200 years. Best practice methods for protecting the critical root zones will be identified in order to ensure the ongoing growth of these valuable site assets. Page 1 of 4 MEMORANDUM Site Hardscape The landscape site plan provides a variety of locations and scales of outdoor spaces, identifying paths, courtyards and plaza areas that support educational, campus -character, service access, and security goals. Paths and courtyards are positioned to notjust connect, but to also encourage interaction and exchange. Plazas at the entry areas on the north and east sides of the building support a sense of arrival. Paved courtyard areas are located within the central campus to support student gatherings of different sizes as well as outdoor learning opportunities. Site furnishings help organize the spaces and support multiple seating and gathering opportunities. A paved area west of the gymnasium wing can support larger group activities such as basketball and other active sports, and potential community events such as markets. Right-of-way improvements are provided on South 308th and South 304th Streets, including new sidewalks, and pedestrian pathways are provided through the parking lots to connect the building to the surrounding public ways. Topography and Grading Site topography on this 40 acre site steps from the north east to the south west with an overall grade change of approximately 55 feet. The topography offers a tool to define areas connected by overlooks, walks and rainwater conveyance. The landscape site plan maximizes these opportunities and couples them with the augmentation of existing hydrologic patterns on the west edge of the site. Grading profiles for the stormwater bioretention and detention areas correspond with expected frequency and volume of stormwater run-off flows. The detention ponds are further modulated to include side slopes that will provide a variety of habitats based on the calculated level and duration of inundation. The plant list has been organized to respond to these different hydro -period areas. Irrigation Irrigation systems support the establishment and ongoing growth of strong, vibrant planting areas, and maintain growth of areas such as lawns where active uses are expected. All shrub, lawn and stormwater planting areas shall be watered with automatic below -ground irrigation systems. Planting Plants foster a sense of place within a region, the ecological function, and a cohesive campus experience. The landscape site plan illustrates a range of strategies. Strong lines of trees mark the major public paths and trace the rain -water conveyance routes. These provide a way - finding tool and work with the buildings and topography to structure the spatial character of the campus. Restoration planting is proposed in storm -water treatment and detention areas in order to express the ecological and habitat function of these elements, especially along the west edge of the site. Lawn and shrub plantings organize and define higher use areas. The majority of the plants for the site as a whole are drought -tolerant and native/adaptive species that will require less irrigation as they become established. Parking The primary parking lot is located at the north half of the site. It is located in such a way as to minimize visibility of the large surface from the public way, but to also be clearly visible and apparent to visitors. Compliant parking lot landscaping is provided, in the form of trees and vegetated rain gardens. Page 2 of 4 MEMORANDUM Site Services A service yard/ loading area is integrated into the building on the north side, and is screened from view, while still being easily accessible from the main site circulation path. A transformer and generator enclosure is provided at the south of the site to screen these required elements from view on all sides. Lighting Lighting is provided in parking lots, at entries, and at throughout the site to create a sense of safety and welcome. Lighting will comply with standards per attached site light level diagram. Buildine DesiRn The location of the new school at the southeast corner of the site - at the intersection of Pacific Highway and South 304th Street - allows the school to reclaim the corner for the community and create a powerful sense of place for this essential institution. It will establish a strong presence for the school along a major regional arterial and serve as a model for neighboring future development along Pacific Highway. Building Massing The building massing responds to the context of the topography, neighboring streets, and neighboring zoning and development. The school is nestled into the hillside at the east facade, to mitigate the height of the structure above the pedestrian sidewalk at highway 99, and also to respond to existing changes in topography. The building steps down the hill at each classroom "wing" as it moves to the east, responding to existing grade changes. The building facade on South 308th street is limited to 2 stories high, per zoning height restrictions adjacent to residential uses. The eastern portion of the school houses the commons and main circulation and public spaces, creating and armature for all other program elements to plug into. The tall volume of the gym is located away from the street, to provide adjacency to the athletic fields, but also to minimize the street presence of large facades with few openings. The theater volume is a curvilinear form, creating a strong icon and adding interest this large shape. The remainder of the program spaces are housed in masses of varying heights, and assembled in such a way as to create a variety of outdoor experiences. Within the interior court of the building, articulation creates sub -courtyards to break up the scale of the space, as well as to provide natural daylight to all spaces. Multiple access points to this court are provided, as well as external circulation and exit stairs, to activate the court for daily use. Building materials are selected for visual interest and aesthetics, as well as durability and maintenance concerns. See statement of architectural design intent on elevation sheet A211. Building Entries The building has three significant entries. The most prominent of these, and the one that will be serve as the primary entry throughout the day, is the northeast. This entry is on grade with State Route 99 and the bus drop-off/ visitor parking. It is highly visible from both the north end of the site, as well as the sidewalk and right-of-way along the highway. The north entry is a lower entry on grade with the main parking lot and play fields. This entry will be open at the beginning of the school day, and will also serve as the primary after-hours entry for athletic, drama, and other events. It is highly visible from the north of the site and the parking lot. The Page 3 of 4 MEMORANDUM north and northeast entries flank either side of the iconic theater volume. The southeast entry is located at grade at the intersection of highway 99 and South 308th Street. This entry is the most accessible from the Metro bus stop just across S. 308th Street, and is highly visible from the rights -of -way on both S. 308th St. and highway 99. All entries incorporate a large amount of glass, as well as brightly colored canopies, for maximum visibility. They are all provided with generous pedestrian plazas easily accessible from public areas and/or on -site pedestrian circulation. Building Facades The east and south facades, which front on public ways, are articulated in order to break up the mass as well as to provide interest and a reference to the speed of the vehicular traffic. The east facade is "folded" in a rapid angular pattern of alternating 20' and 10' segments. The south facade is "folded" in a pattern at a slower pace, with alternating segments of approximately 100' and 40'. Facades incorporate a generous amount of glass, within allowable limits of the energy code, to create transparency, passive security, and a connection to the community. Facades interior to the site utilize more subtle material and plane changes in order to break up the mass. Landscaping is provided at much of the building facade. END OF MEMORANDUM Page 4 of 4 If N AF a a J N, a 91 a al 0 it Ar ofa If Aar 0 ff A &I 0 0 .7 y u Brick Cladding BC-1 Brick Cladding BC-2 Metal Cladding MC1-MC5 - Silver Metal Cladding MC1-MC5 - Blue Brick Cladding BC-3 Metal Cladding MC1-MC5 - Mid-Grey IR Brick Cladding BC-4 Metal Cladding MC1-MC5 - Dark Grey FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL - EXTERIOR MATERIALS Metal Cladding MC6 # 1 0 0 0 0 0 0:9 0 0 0 0 0 # 0 a a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 Is ■ • f/I • • • ■ ■ ■ • • • • • • • • • • ■•f1/■•• ••••••■ ••fr■■•1 ■ ! ■ ■ / I • • ■ • • • • • ■ • • ■ • ■ R ■ • • I Is r • ■ f 1/ • • • ■ ■ 1 • • ■ • ■ • ■ • • ■ ■ • f ■ ■ ■ see ■ • • ■ 1 • • ■ • ■ • f • ■ • • i • f • 1 / ■ • • ■ f ! • • ■ • • • • • • • ! •■*to ■■■ 0■10000 ■■••• •••Isib •• •■••••• •■!•••■ • • f 11 • • • • • ■ • • • ■ • ■ ■ ■ a • ■ • • • ■ I l f • • ! • ■ 1 • • ■ ■ • 16 ■ • • • Mechanical Screen Wall - MSW Anodized AlumMWOW ROMV 61 Nnr SRCi Q E Ps Site Lighting A layered approach to site lighting with parking area light fixtures mounted on high poles combined with path lighting will provide safe and even light levels while high- lighting architectural and landscape features. Highlighting of building entrances will provide visual cues as to destination and location. Light fixture locations will be select- ed with sensitivity to adjacent residential neighborhood and be shielded and full cutoff to reduce light pollution into the night time sky. Building entries will be highlighted to create a destination when viewing the building from a distance. Exterior building lighting will be provided in most cases by interior lighting transmitting through transparent or translucent fenestration. The exterior shape of the auditorium will be washed with light to ensure this form is visible from a distance as a destination for the community. Exterior Courtyards will be illuminated with a combination of pedestrian scale light poles and low level bench and step light fixtures. The pedestrian scale fixtures will provide broad light distribution while being full shielded, reducing light pollution into the night time sky. Exterior fixtures will be LED for long lamp life and low maintenance. Landscape areas will have minimal lighting with a few key pathways illuminated to provide view into the distance while retaining dark skies. Lighting at parking areas will be provided by full -cut-off light fixtures equipped with high performance optics. Light fixtures will be positioned to aim away from the building to reduce glare and view into light fixtures. Careful selection of light fixtures will ensure even light levels while reducing light trespass onto adjacent properties. - 1 Footcandle average maintained 2 Footcandle average maintained 3 Footcandle average maintained 5 Footcandle average maintained S Yy 'OP FEDEF�'A,�. CDs FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL - SITE LIGHT LEVEL DIAGRAM XMWSP February 19, 2014 CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 w ww.c i tyo f federal waY.co m Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Instructions This checklist is designed to assist the project proponent in demonstrating how CPTED principles have been met. This goal can also be met by submitting a written explanation as to how each of the three design principles of Natural Surveillance, Access Control, and Ownership has been met. The checklist has been prepared to provide guidance and assistance in regard to the integration of CPTED principles into proposed project designs. The purpose of the checklist is to assist a project proponent in identifying and incorporating design strategies that implement the CPTED principles identified in Federal Way Revised Code (FVWRC) 19.115.010. CPTED principles, performance standards, and strategies are used during project development review to identify and incorporate design features, which reduce opportunities for criminal activity to occur. The effectiveness of CPTED is based on the fact that criminals make rational choices about their targets. In general: (1) The greater the risk of being seen, challenged, or caught; the less likely they are to commit a crime. (2) The greater the effort required, the less likely they are to commit a crime. (3) The lesser the actual or perceived rewards, the less likely they are to commit a crime. Through use of CPTED principles, the built environment can be designed and managed to ensure: (1) There is more chance of being seen, challenged, or caught; (2) Greater effort is required; (3) The actual or perceived rewards are less; and RECEIVED (4) Opportunities for criminal activity are minimized. MAR 10 2014 CPTED Design Principles CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CPTED design principles are functionally grouped into three categories: CDS (1) Natural Surveillance. This category focuses on strategies to design the built environment in a manner that promotes visibility of public spaces and areas. (2) Access Control. This category focuses on the techniques that prevent and/or deter unauthorized and/or inappropriate access. (3) Ownership. This category focuses on strategies to reduce the perception of areas as "ownerless" and therefore available for undesirable uses. Bulletin #021 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 2 k:\Handout \CPTED Instructions How to Use This Checklist This checklist has been prepared to assist in identifying appropriate strategies to incorporate CPTED design principles into proposed projects in Federal Way. The guidelines included in this checklist expand on the principles found in FWRC 19.115.010. It is recommended that the principles be reviewed initially to identify the approaches used to implement CPTED. Subsequent to this initial review, this checklist should be reviewed to identify additional strategies that may be applicable for a proposed project. Not all strategies are applicable to all projects. In addition, the CPTED principles may be addressed through strategies that are not listed. Checklist Design The checklist has been organized in the following manner: Functional Area Spec fc design element Section and .( Functional Area Evaluation addressed by CPTED principles Performance Performance Standard for Agency Performance Standard Standard Use Only H lw is the desired outcome of Strategy applying CPTED principles to this junctional area X,tMk&blc durint Site Ptrn Review 6 Apptk" dudre Buildint Pons; Rcvkw Strategy Setts 1.0: Natural Surveillance Technique which can be used to implement CPTED principles Check Box 1.1 Blind Corners indicate by checking this box ijAvoid blind corners in pathways andparking lots.this FNA strategy has been used in the proposed project Strategy Wrtte4n This section can be used to write in a strategy which is not specifically listed but is employed in the project Process Applicability Indicates when in the review process the identified guideline should be assessed Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways'should be permeable (see through) including landscaping. fencing etc. ■ Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around corners-0 Other stralell+ Site Plan and Building Permit Review Certain guidelines and techniques are best applied during different points in the review process. To assist in facilitating CPTED review, guidelines which are best considered during site plan review are indicated with a "■ " symbol. Guidelines that are most appropriately applied during building permit review are indicated with a "e" symbol. Bulletin #021 —January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 2 kAHandout \CPTED Instructions 41k CITY Federala. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederakwa�Lconz Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Directions Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by City Staff, and will be integrated into the Site Plan and/or Building Permit review process. Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance 1.1 Blind Corners —Conforms Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. —Revise _NA Comments: XPathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should be permeable (see through) including landscaping, fencing etc. ■ Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around corners. e Other strategy used: El 1.2 Site and Building Layout —Conforms Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the —Revise use to the street, and between uses _NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on For Non -Single corners. [ Family Development NA ❑ Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the dwelling. ■ Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/ retail development should not be from the rear of the building. ■ ❑ Offset windows, doorways and balconies to allow for natural observation while protecting privacy. ■ Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view of the street. ■ For Commercial/ Retail/ Industrial If employee entrances must be separated from the main and Community ❑ entrance, they should maximize opportunities for natural Facilities surveillance from the street. ■ NA © In industrial developments, administration/offices should be located at the front of the building. ■ NA Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses of For Surface X parking are proposed, provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ See below. Parking Structures Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. ■ ow Avoid hidden recesses. ■ OeLocate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. ■ Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people. Parks, plazas, Open Space ow common areas, and playgrounds should be placed in the front Areas of buildings. Shopping centers and other similar uses should face streets. ■ Other strategy used: A large primary parking lot is provided, but visibility is ❑ maintained across the I from the site and the S#Feet— Evaluation for Agency Use Only Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review 1.3 Common/Open Space Areas and Public On -Site Open —Conforms Space —Revise Provide natural surveillance for common open space areas. _NA Comments: Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent oe to main common/open space areas, e.g. playgrounds, swimming pools, etc., and public on -site open space. ■ Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which owscreens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. ■ Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells ❑ close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the building entry. e ❑ Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy used: 1.4 Entrances _.Conforms Provide entries that are clearly visible. _Revise _NA Comments: XDesign entrances to allow users to see into them before entering. ■ Entrances should be clearly identified (Signs must conform to ❑ FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. (Applicable during Certificate of Occupancy Inspection . Other strategy used: El 1.5 Fencing —Conforms Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the _Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and _NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review 8 Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g. pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. e Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ❑ open elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. e If noise insulation is required, install double -glazing at the ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. e Evaluation for Agency Use Only Other strategy used: El 1.6 Landscaping —Conforms Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and —Revise allows intruders to hide. —NA Comments: Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. ■ Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and along pedestrian pathways. ■ Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. ■ Other strategy used: 1.7 Exterior Lighting —Conforms Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. _Revise (Refer to FWRC 19.115.050(7)(a) for specific lighting —NA requirements.) Comments: Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 9 kAHandouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. ■ For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that lighting ❑ supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal - resistant. e 13 Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access/egress routes, and signage is well lit. e ❑ In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and ❑ mature form, as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light. e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid ❑ giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e Select and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. i Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people © (retirement homes, congregate care facilities, senior and/ or community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in public/common areas. e Other strategy used:. n 1.8 Mix of Uses In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural surveillance, while protecting privacy. Evaluation for Agency Use Only —Conforms Revise _NA Comments: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 9 k:\J-Iandouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review A Applicable during Building Permit Review Where allowed by city code, locate shops and businesses on lower floors and residences on upper floors. In this way, ❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the residences can be observed by the businesses during business hours. ■ NA ❑ Include food kiosks, restaurants, etc. within parks and parking structures. ■ Other strategy: used 13 1.9 Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors When used and permitted by building and fire codes, security bars, shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street and be consistent with the architectural style og the building. ❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable (see -through). e Other strategy used: 13 Evaluation for Agency Use Only —Conforms Revise _NA Cornrn nts: Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy M Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification —Conforms Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to —Revise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find _NA the building. Identification signs must conform to FWRC Comments: 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ❑ Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. e Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review In residential uses, each individual unit should be clearly numbered. In multiple building complexes, each building entry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry. In addition, unit numbers should be provided on each level or floor. e ❑ Street numbers should be made of durable materials, preferably reflective or luminous, and unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). e For larger projects, provide location maps (fixed plaque ❑ format) and directional signage at public entry points and along internal public routes of travel. e Other strategy used: 13 2.2 Entrances —Conforms Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. —Revise _NA Comments: Entrances should be easily recognizable through design ow features and directional signage. (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ■ Ar Minimize the number of entry points. ■ Other strategy used: 2.3 Landscaping _Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access. _Revise _NA Comments: ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e Other strategy used: 13 2.4 Landscaping Location _Conforms Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a .—Revise building or to neighboring buildings. _NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures, fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. ■ Other strategy used: 2.5 Security —Conforms Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access Revise _NA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures ❑ to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable during Certificate of Occupancy Inspection.}. Other strategy used: 13 2.6 Signage —Conforms Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple to —Revise understand [Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt NA Signs]. Comments: Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graphics for informational signs. e Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and For Surface ❑ drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators, and exits. e Parking Structures ❑ In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system. e ❑ Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. e Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used: Section 3.0 Ownership 3.1 Maintenance —Conforms Create a "cared for" image —Revise _NA Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWRC ❑ 19.125.090, in order to give an impression of ownership, care, and security. (Ongoing). Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no ❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance. 0 NA Other strategy used: Plant selection will ❑ allow for minimal 3.2 Materials —Conforms Use materials, which reduce the opportunity for vandalism. —Revise _NA Comments: Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel ❑ materials, anti -graffiti paints, and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. e ❑ Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWRC 19.125.040(21) regarding the use of vegetative screens. e Common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points, or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: 13 Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South RECEIVEFederal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 ww"wi iyof federalway.coin MAR 10 2014 C7Y OF FEDERAL VVAY CDS HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY STATEMENT CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AND WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS I. WHY SHOULD THIS INVENTORY STATEMENT BE FILLED OUT? Critical Aquifer Recharge (CARAs) and Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) are considered "critical areas" pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWCC), Title 14, "Environmental Policy." This inventory statement must be filled out by the applicant or agent for any proposed activity listed in Section H of this handout, and which are located within Wellhead Capture Zones 1, 5, and 10 as shown on the Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas Maps. Please refer to the handout on Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas for a description of the review process. H. ACTIVITIES GOVERNED BY CARA AND WHPA REGULATIONS The inventory statement must be filled out for the following activities: ■ Construction of any residential structure, including single-family development ■ Construction of any barn or other agricultural structure ■ Construction of any office, school, commercial, recreational, service, or storage building • Construction of a parking lot of any size + Other minor new construction (see WAC 197-11-800[2]) + Additions or modifications to or replacement of any building or facility (does not include tenant improvements) + Demolition of any structure • Any landfill or excavation + Installation of underground tanks + Any division of land, including short plats • Change of use, which involves repair, remodeling, and maintenance activities ■ Dredging ■ Reconstruction/maintenance of groins and similar shoreline protection structures • Replacement of utility cables that must be buried under the surface of the bedlands ■ Repair/rebuilding of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs • Installation or construction of any utility, except for on -going operation and maintenance activities of public wells by public water providers • Personal wireless service facilities Project Name Federal Way High School Applicant Project Location 30611 16th Avenue South, 98003 Tracking No. Ingrid Krueger, SRG III. TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Please provide the approximate quantity of the types of hazardous materials or deleterious substances that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity. If no hazardous materials will be involved, please proceed to Section IV. MATERIAL LIQUID(gallons) SOLID (pounds) (1) Acid or basic solutions or solids (2) Antifreeze or coolants (3) Bleaches, peroxides, detergents, surfactants, disinfectants, bactericides, al aecides (4) Brake, transmission, hydraulic fluids (5) Brine solutions (6) Corrosion or rust prevention solutions (7) Cutting fluids (8) Deicing materials (9) Dry cleaning or cleaning solvents (10) Electroplating or metal finishing solutions (11) Engraving or etching solutions (12) Explosives (13) Fertilizers (14) Food or animal processing wastes (15) Formaldehyde (16) Fuels, additives, oils, greases 175 gallon propane (17) Glues, adhesives, or resins (18) Inks, printing, or photocopying chemicals (19) Laboratory chemicals, reagents or standards (20) Medical, hospital, pharmaceutical, dental, or veterinary fluids or wastes (21) Metals (hazardous e.g. arsenic, copper, chromium, lead, mercury, silver, etc.) (22) Paints, pigments, dyes, stains, varnish, sealers. (23) Pesticides, herbicides or poisons (24) Plastic resins, plasticizers, or catalysts (25) Photo development chemicals (26) Radioactive sources (27) Refrigerants, cooling water (contact) (28) Sludges, still bottoms (29) Solvents, thinners, paint removers or strippers (30) Tanning (leather) chemicals (3 1) Transformer, capacitor oils/fluids, PCB's (32) Waste oil (33) Wood preservatives (34) List OTHER hazardous materials or deleterious substances on a separate sheet. Bulletin #056 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Project Name Federal Way High School Applicant Ingrid Krueger, SRG Project Location 30611 16th Avenue South, 98003 Tracking No. IV. FURTHER INFORMATION Provide the approximate quantity of fill and source of fill to be imported to the site. Approximate Quantity of Im orted Fill Source of Fill 18,000 CY local quarry Check box #1 if you do not plan to store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous material or deleterious substance listed in Section Ill. Check box(s) #2 through #5 (and fill in appropriate blanks) of the below table if they apply to your facility or activity. #1 [ ] The proposed development will not store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous materials or deleterious substances listed above. #2 [X] Above ground storage tanks, having a capacity of 175.gallons will be installed. #3 [ ] Construction vehicles will be refueled on site. Storage within wholesale and retail facilities of hazardous materials, or other deleterious #4 [ ] substances, will be for sale in original containers with a capacity of _ gallons liquid or pounds solid. The presence of chemical substances on this parcel is/will be for "temporary" non -routine #5 [ ] maintenance or repair of the facility (such as paints and paint thinners) and are in individual containers with a capacity of _ gallons liquid or pounds solid. Check any of the following items that currently exist or are proposed in connection with the development of the site. #1 [ ] Stormwater infiltration system (e.g., french drain, dry well, stormwater swale, etc.) #2 [ ] Hydraulic lifts or elevator, chemical systems, or other machinery that uses hazardous materials #3 [ ] Cathodic protection wells #4 [ ] Water wells, monitoring wells, resource protection wells, piezometers #5 [ ] Leak detection devices, training for employees for use of hazardous materials, self-contained machinery, etc. SIGNATURE Signature Ingrid Krueger, SRG Partnership, Inc. Print Name Date If you have any questions about filling out this application form, please call the Department of Community Development Services at 253-835-2607. Please be advised that an application for a development permit lacking the required information will not be accepted. Bulletin #056 —January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Ada - FT, Lt -)I.. ,* J N 1, 3F Ai w -RW7 4r ik dL Ift 49. pm" 0 ar -OF, •� � .�jy. � ' ��rf n{ yyyL y � n. � ~f . 1� •��y, i': .1�� r .. f�i+'iF• •'Ike, r �� li .0 �T�T �� � ay. ...+. •Tye. .. �-�.C'tif' ..[• �� _ � �y-_ .. _ 40 Pow I wpv rw all Will, Laip nd oil= � 1 ==Nmmnm a � a .r� Easter Z �: ti �rifical-Areas Map i 200 offset from(site ; Sri :A" a 37.5Til�".T� Highlighted Feature =� County Boundary X Mountain Peaks O ShoreJirre Gonffition tAl tI%h Tan r LOW Kghways incoinporated Area Streets Highway - Adurids LOGzd Parcels Lakes airmd Lange Rvers Streams GAO, Basin C6rK:1t an Ej Higo 0 medhim D LOW l coded F15el:lef RECEIVED MAR 10 2014 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Property Line r' 150' offset of Pro erg -_Lane P. Y bag& AN AA Am 49 ... r _ , 46M End j --- ;• - a _ lift 4k -fop ulij _ 'ai . r Arrows in d rivewa Site Plan w/ Access Points RECEIVED MAR ' a 2014 CM -'OF FEDER-Ai WAY C DS lop = 200`-0" O F CITY RECEIVED NAAR 0 Z014 Federal WayC� � ��Dc mil~ WAY MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`4 Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 wWw.dL affeder.JW"Y-cunt 14- )O10('tt3 -cam c APPLICATION m(S) r 0 105 J 1)p I' 5— 5 G Date —�Pm Project Name Federal Way Hiqh School Property Address/Location 31031 Pacific Highway Parcel Number(s) 0821049001 Project Description PLFASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process H (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI 4L SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RS7.2 Zoning Designation SF high DensityComprehensive Plan Designation Value of Existing Improvements unknown Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): N/A Occupancy Type N/A Construction Type Bulletin WM — January 1, 2011 Applicant Name: Federal Way Public Schools Address: 33330 8th Ave S City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-945-5934 Fax: 253-945-5959 Email: ro e d iw org Signature: Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Chad Weiser of Otak, Inc. Adams: 10230 NE Points Drive Suite 400 City/State: Kirkland, WA Zip:, Phone: 425-250-5250 Fax: 425-8q 9577 Email: ch .ei er o E5. m Signature -- Owner Name: Federal Way Public Schools Address: 33330 8th Ave S City/State: Federal Way, WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-945-5934 Fax: 253-945-5959 Email: rod-leland@fwps.o Signatur Page 1 of 1 011mdoutsWaster Land Use Application Matt Herrera From: Matt Herrera Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 3:35 PM To: 'wiesejol @comcast.net' Cc: Erik Preston; Rick Perez Subject: Federal Way High School Replacement File #14-101058-UP Mr. Wiese Thank you for your recent comments regarding the Federal Way High School replacement land use permit. Staff from the Public Works Traffic Division reviewed your comments and Senior Traffic Engineer Erik Preston has provided a response below. As a party of record, you will receive the environmental determination expected to be issued next month and the land use decision expected to be issued this summer. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the land use application. Thank you. —MH Matt Herrera, AICP — Senior Planner Community and Economic Development 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 253.835.2638 (p) / 253.835.2609 (f) Matt. Herrer r@cit offederalwa .com From: Erik Preston Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 2:32 PM To: Matt Herrera Cc: Rick Perez Subject: RE: Federal Way High School Replacement File #14-101058-UP Mr. Wiese, Thank -you for sharing your concerns about traffic on 101" And 11t" Ave S between S 304t" and S 308t" St. Hopefully I can address your questions and concerns below: We do not anticipate a traffic shift due to the access revisions (new north driveway) proposed for the school. Although the main parking area shifts north, it can still be accessed from both S 304 St and S 308 St. The relocation does not appear to be enough to cause a shift in traffic from 308t" to 304t". In addition, the Mini - Roundabout at the S 308t" St driveway will make it easier to get in and out of the driveway than the current stop control. If the shift in parking location made the new 3041" driveway slightly more attractive, the presence of 2 speed humps on both 101" and 11t" would likely discourage any shift. The required frontage improvements on S 3041" St will provide on -street parking and sidewalk along the entire frontage. This will increase the parking supply along 304t", which should improve the situation during baseball games. Let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Erik Preston, PE City of Federal Way erik.resior�'�'ciiyc�fi�_c�r:t aiwc�y,cam O: (253) 835-2744 M: (253) 261-3786 From: John Wiese fmailto:wiesejol@comcast.nekl Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 12:46 PM To: Matt Herrera Subject: Federal Way High School Replacement File #14-101058-UP City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Department Matt Herrera, Having reviewed the reference document along with landscaping and other drawings I have two major concerns. 1. There was no traffic analysis for loth and 11th Avenues S between S 308th St. and S 304th St. Certainly, as your traffic analyses shows, the traffic patterns will change with a main entrance to the high school on S 304th St. I believe that loth and 11th Avenues S will have additional traffic due to this change. Why didn't the traffic analysis include loth and llth? What will be done to mitigate additional traffic on loth and llth Avenues S? I believe nothing. 2. 1 did not see any traffic analysis for sporting and other events at Memorial stadium or the ball fields. In particular I know from experience that when a baseball game is played at the west ball field (lower) on S. 304th St. the attendees have very little parking space and park along S. 304th St. and 1lth Ave S. Expecting attendees to these events to park in the school parking lot (which will be about quarter mile away) is folly. Yours sincerely, John 0. Wiese 30405 11th Ave. S. Federal Way WA Matt Herrera From: Brandon Reynon<brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 11:16 AM To: Matt Herrera Subject: RE: Federal Way High School NOA & Opt DNS Hi Matt, Not a problem, I'm glad that my comments made it to you. The proposed project for the new Federal Way High School site is going to need a cultural resource review. The proposed location is in close proximity to Cold Creek as well as Steele Lake and Redondo Beach all of which are places that have high potential for impacting cultural resources. In order to avoid impacting these precious resources, we request that this survey be conducted ahead of construction to limit any damage that may occur. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. It is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Tri6al ArAaeologisV&Itural Kegulatory jpecialist Puyallup Tribe of Indians 2.55-575.79s6 E-veryt6ing I am is because of my Ancestors From: Matt Herrera jmalito:M tt.Herrera@c!NOffiederalway.coml Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 9:57 AM To: Brandon Reynon Subject: RE: Federal Way High School NOA & Opt DNS Hi Brandon, Apologies for the late response, I've been out of the office this week. It looks like our admin provided an incorrect email address. I'm unaware of any cultural resource assessment being conducted for the proposal. The school district did not submit such a report with their land use application. Matt Herrera, AICP Senior Planner City of Federal Way 253.835.2638 From: Tamara Fix Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 8:02 AM To: Matt Herrera Subject: FW: Federal Way High School NOA & Opt DNS Not sure if he got in touch with you, but this email came through while I was gone. From: Brandon Reynon f mailto:bra ndon.re non u allu tribe.com Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 11:26 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: RE: Federal Way High School NOA & Opt DNS I tried emailing Matt but the email link wasn't working. Can you please pass the following onto Mr. Herrera for me? Thank you: Mr. Herrera, I have received information from Ms. Fix regarding the proposed construction of the new Federal Way High School. was wondering if a cultural resource assessment was ever conducted for this project? Tribal ArchaeologisVCultural Kegulatory Specialist Puyallup Tribe of Indians 255-575.7980' Fverytking I am is because 4 my Ancestors From: Tamara Fix [mailto:Tamara.Fix@cityoffederalway.com] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 8:24 AM To: 'sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov'; 'ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov'; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; claudew(dpscleanair.org; tnascime@fwps.org; 'basbury@lakehaven.org'; Chris Ingham; Gordon Goodsell; Brandon Reynon; 'iaura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us' Cc: Matt Herrera Subject: Federal Way High School NOA & Opt DNS Attached is an NOA & Opt DNS for Federal Way High School, along with an Environmental Checklist. Please contact Senior Planner Matt Herrera at 253-835-2638 or matthew.herrera@cityoffederalway.com for questions. 7-amara Fix Adiv.in Ar st. City of Federal-11'ay tamaraAK@)cityo ffederaCwau.corrz "When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile." Unknown Matt Herrera From: John Wiese <wiesejo1@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 12:46 PM To: Matt Herrera Subject: Federal Way High School Replacement File #14-101058-UP City of Federal Way Community and Economic Development Department Matt Herrera, Having reviewed the reference document along with landscaping and other drawings I have two major concerns. 1. There was no traffic analysis for 10th and 11th Avenues S between S 308th St. and S 304th St. Certainly, as your traffic analyses shows, the traffic patterns will change with a main entrance to the high school on S 304th St. I believe that 10th and 11th Avenues S will have additional traffic due to this change. Why didn't the traffic analysis include 101h and 11th? What will be done to mitigate additional traffic on 10th and 11th Avenues S? I believe nothing. 2. 1 did not see any traffic analysis for sporting and other events at Memorial stadium or the ball fields. In particular I know from experience that when a baseball game is played at the west ball field (lower) on S. 3041h St. the attendees have very little parking space and park along S. 304th St. and 11th Ave S. Expecting attendees to these events to park in the school parking lot (which will be about quarter mile away) is folly. Yours sincerely, John O. Wiese 30405 11th Ave. S. Federal Way WA CIT Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, Clayton Wiebe hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑x Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice El Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or El posted to or at each of the attached addresses on April 2014, Project Name Federal Way High School Replacement File Number(s) Signature Date�� K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Postin„ Sites: Federal Way City Hall- 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library- 34200 1st Way South Federal Way 320h Branch Library- 848 South 320th Street Subject Site- 30611 16th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 K\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Pasting Sites.doc 411%kL� CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 980013 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.dfyofl`edercJwa,/.cqM DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) RR Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretatbn ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ;mailed 0 faxed 6e-mar ed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on Q 2014. Project Name File Number(s) Iy-1O/05 n L, Signature V Date L%- _y '/ y K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /22/2014 240:00 PM 02/2512014 City of 300' Parcel Notification area City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way for Parcel 082104-9001 Federal Way -7000 003 (206) - 835 7000 www, ci tyoffed era Iway_com _ i.,] .�.r. . -1.— :.. wSI;Fw u.!•i,a011 .2,0<--1 °E210a5221 0e210aE16B �� WtCr 6q a15%0. xSm•' xbtiR iW S,Ylur>~ 6s� _ ;< - CCS ep}1WC.1� �p 01k Oi•+T'tl�1LR�m¢� � �z■ n°� 'or'm tw°0 0� °p0 w ws�sm+4oestmmlo y w`�ao osaruay. .. r ,,.. V � ev+owlm ST ST ST 3301 ST ST ans G mwnmtoaxaoo-4v7s a yea aula;ar n � -� � o,+o s'avoa]cal���� s•, woo- �° acv msuo. msxa wn cnvnarsaz000nv q 5,!]OP d f 1 °ceo V,w T x• � xwoo- om � oaoo � w�wm.vasv°s°n � �-wrn_r .2 °a-vzs ow s 'o stem. °� xuao-^ . xsm. � asx000m sasbvwts msxacmo °°eawaeac zsw°a-0,m WrP .40 MO Oma 4am S 30RftD Pi"vv"nnI= OTa]i} CGf100. W]u00011 tr' 'Ga0,0 Ffeo aoa aan 11" „ 8302N0ST 3302N0$T 0280 0IR 6 41s F 4ti1 Wiz 0.`61] Iw zse2°a steer srem. etio arspemse °ad a wsa '* Qs.� wama,w wn[o nos msrwcaes eamacn�ro 7 a oxro ode° wW p' re N+aer ( atsecoaue ens m . meld m w.gmo enJ]oafi+ + oaztoaao,2 awe ° med s1:m y,stn. wwo-,arra w. ormo- • °'mq m' tlliLM56 OSYO°an0 d44w ws°wclw Wee ~NS]°Paf°5 a K yy))paraL rruow aola x,e Q]L�'Ga,SO a-.mou+m y�yyCr15 oCyroaaraY s'ow m i sm o .710°`S 303RD ST S 303R0 ST 5302 i m00 Odd se avo o2S'AO- O 210 9 > ons ooswo- ozs]oo- ozvm- 02saoo-02ao o2saoo-0zw ozswom2o a 2,° - 052 ABJB°-0tOp stax mare oxsaoomlo 02ssoa-0zw °o� z60 o2ss 0- ozsuwoa2as ozswo-022s ozso°o-0x1s o2swo-0zas o2s,aoazss d vmo ue osztoaams room c� s_ .i om' 4k 'm'wew 6ww S40. rw 1r° i f1i xOtLWDP ollo Cps y9yS eiN w mlm oszta,.trd � 61114 G.. x sly 17 oszto.xw oaz,oa.s°m I oa21°a-s,°s onwce,u a' 'ytWfo- am r Iwmt. 't � '06T b2'awm �, °�'0`9''61 I7 oral o°,o mee ra,wcI" :wseoarac G mio ,� osztaaose wv..se m S 304T11 ST W S 304TH ST S 304TH ST 5 304TH ST wluco- 7 dto°o- > �e *xx, �,4pppn,4 N 121pC-91a6 oov. Ww Q on,uarx, ovztaaou::ac�r 5 °011°ef4'fD .15 r_ e7,m wvtsarr w•4oF m,a wto wore ' w ,�+] 0�10''r emtowne asztaaator 09ws°o W,114 a MY i0 a92to6FAot W]1m V . MO 9W • amWtem4t,i,npoe0a °,°2 __. ,z. at-0 2� °,oa_2�,Fedaraf Way sar. z2-5 Lu,wmrx S 305TH PIL z•s� m �y 4�aae5MWY r 2p02 .z _z �„ 0, ++ hSchool w azs 2-11 2=- 25,"- 2-,r6Hi m,m°mu ST 5300-1 amorau. a�woaom I ' ca,:or xu a:moo ows o.q U! rarrawrr mF5 c9P1GA1Li 00°1Dr-1rN ( 'r - .tt�LC�+Is mr0u0a,W ox000.�IM �o,tl a921°4-0102 ... �- •,• °3C' °59roe-0]Ea cm�e Wr{�A,a [e14Aeattl 01WG N W+saoarca ArW.w,as 00 x,Leo � as2toastn oee+a. cvneaeb = W,LS100a4aryt9pparW = ! rl.a oefo°R [r,P O,LS V ooroa.sn. ~o F uN.0.Cfw0 w+w°arn � wruo Q cw,cL.o,n avwvcr sty, 09210aAt3° 0921aCA1]5 owo 4 nH osnoa-st3z TH ST S 308TH ST S 308TH ST y _ 8.9ifsT" ST asz,oa-92C2 S JIIBTH 5T �•••— Q z�]oo- �-zo scew— z=_owoaoao + :aveocl�o coos 2�+aomts's esno-0,zs Q ,eswoa,azeswo-0 zaenaa000 a 'SaW9�r V osszss-0000 �� m npr)-0ns R roeroo- s,so TR aef,o,4m ,-•^-. .21 -m2a rissco[o'lo resu° 1. 'msio ,esaw-0°oz m� Wmrtlr4 OCl1� 0,a 0aw° M.]EC�1 53Fa-0,1° rarto- oosr°r � 18536°-00°3 Bela 25s`•9a-0°00 .�}rwa,W OE2a,aspr/ nib(•0.G0 ,fSM°os„ nsxra,u rda]P6 D]tf r{gm.Wr6 l+xo , w" lfio-0,ma10a]0.6mv�LWme0aiaa6n�onrc°t+ tGSY,m1, B7s5a0]mmWTaHmmnE¢SS w+aar]. xif�2Yee.T'.m1c6-X-,�sa] rarws]rR�9mSa1 nDsfoaEn6ns�r1a06s �100rmon;,°°ac e awt7rT '". 'o�en'Goa'-sqzM2t ae2rwwv 10- sW°mraocopc°50s,Sia6p"m5ro°; �aez,°ro,e,�aa�osw] im �osr OaToso.Hxa Gi11r b.ocraat " a3z1a � � r-+]x9�51osfit�o1mv-0lOa ,Ioxiznot ox+mrSa1 =V\1e 7 ens n om Do- we 'o°oer ooW t.yseneorJ zpa a e,<2wmoai��ke r mruim7— rosva-0,sa T wmna000 � r.�mn >auwaws owccma I w � re:Hea,N p, f, 116YLNA 053�. Q RwsJW- 0° - 5 = oeroa-s,w mnr � �.m asveaa,n '0 rmteoW>7 raswo-0oss °-w °� ex4 oez,oa.soao osxw.seow .� mom �r resxamQ zesao-racr �..... on o,ea xaww+n a rs9aoa,e.. rrse]moy reswom�aoe, nm4ww wR °oszw, S 312TH ST Legend King County Tax Parcels Subject Property Notified Properties [4TY OF \ Scale: Federal Way N 0 150 300 Feet ' f I This map is Intended for use as a graphical representation only The Cdy of Fod oral Wny makes no warranty as to its accuracy. O O 0) OOD CV O fA Ez y d Z 0 L (` /7 T ^ O CL N m N IZ a 0 m = a N J w z_ J U) U) w a w z J U) U) w Q CV N i O O O O 0 0 N 00 00 00 00 00 01 Q` 01 01 O� O� M M Q a> Q Q� Q ¢¢ oo m W, m 3 m 3 3 m m- CD C) w a Q�¢� Q¢ a 0 3 m O. 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3¢¢ H z 3 3 3 a¢ a a z z a z z 3 w o U o W o W ZO ZO H> H A 3¢ A A a A a A A a a z w Z wzv,ww�w�ww��v�U�a N N V] 4k H a 3 Z N a, x aU)oo m N a�H '-' Z x x oo N 4 V] V O� H N O M N CD CDH H N cnc/) O o o o o o o o U�° �- o N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M •--� •--� 0. P, P. P, P, P, 0, P. m a, M M 00 M M M M m m M M M M m O O O O O M O O O O O O O O 0 o O o o O o o O O O O Co O M 00 oo 00 W oo oo o0 = 00 = 00 00 01 O1 ON O, ON ON O C,4 a\ D1 ON O) ON U 0\ ON ¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ Q = N d O ¢ d ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 00 00 333333°� 3(0=0> 33� 3 3 3 3 3 3 w o 3 3 3 3 ¢ 3 3 3 3 3 w aaaaaa�DH� w w w w w w a z w w w w w w w w> O w w w w w w w Q w w w w w w w 0 W w�'wwww��a„w�H„wwwwwwwA > x > > > > x > > > > > > > > a H00 H H H H H H H m O N mcf) Cl �n •--� �t Itm N N \O O �10 \O 110 m M �O �O �o 110 I'O 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Nl- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 M — M M m M M M M M m M M M 1p U x H � � A A Z W w > A rn o w Z J O w � Z F" Q O U O Q U �✓ H d ¢¢w ¢¢ w Q z w w Q d 0 H O J O C- M �O Wn = C-- M It kn N M 'CY � N 0\ O N mm O O Cl) W 00 0 N N N NO O m 01 O� Q1 01 a1 a1 01 01 O� O1 O\ O� 01 Cc V C) CD C) V C> O O_ O_ O O O_ O O_ O O_ O O_ _O O_ _O O — C C ,-- N N N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N � � �n v� �n kn kn �n kn V) W) W) W-) 00 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O C7 d .d z v� O AO a E-W W �W o z W d -1W w z U d> ¢ I-,Z A + w> w z a a > Q 0 w> x O d Z w 9Qx �,�Q�UO°Ozd z O W o O Q N 3 0 Q w Q z v° O O WW u 0 Oa d rx N a a °U a � kn O to o Wn O Vn O kn o Wn o Wn O Wn o Vn O N_ N M M kn Vn O\ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O Cl O a1 CN CN 0\ O1 0\ O1 ON ON O� O1 ON O, Os ol� 0� O\ 0� 0� ON Ol� O1 O1 ON O1 O, 01 0\ 01 as O1 ON O� ON 01 ON O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O Cl O O O O :*I I� M M O T N M'T LO Co Il- M M O r N CO ICT r r r N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M cr e p g a O1 6 s • • 0• 4- J ! ft do •• 4b op rn rn rn rn O p rn rn\ _ �� •-s cc�� Ci7� cn cn AAw`W A� � � • Ib to I*k co v O CT A W O CO U7 A N` O (O 4? m W h? O LO w �1 O m N N N O to vA In 110 O O O N O O O O \D ID ,D ,D w N N N O O O O O O O O O O O ,O ,D ,D 1.0 ,D ,D ,D ,D ,0 ,D ,D N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O ,D ,D ,D ,D ,D ,O O O O O O O O O \D ,D ,D \D ,D ,D � — 77XCC O, O, O, O 0 0 0���� - - O O O O D ,D �O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O I �_ ��� ,moo �� o 0 0 ,D D ,D D D G ,D O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,D ,D ,D ,D ,D ,D ,D ,D O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r O y O O _O N W N c.n O O O A N N N is w .- ,O W N �] N O O W W W A N N N O O A w N ,D A O -1 N A O, O (A O W W N tJ N N N O O ,D "D Oo 00 v to O v, O to O to N N N N IJ N N_ N A W w N N O O to O cn O cn O, � C) n n i7 m r r r r y r" y C C C C a d� m m m m r oyzzzza w w w z C C [ C`" mmmmy Z x x x x o � C " W w w W W 20 N N N N O O O O O 00 00 AO C y m C m 7d O D m A A A d d d d cn w w -n w to w w O a Y d r r r r x r a a a a z 00 ,o `0 y 7y ono °O °° ,O N N N N A 0 00 00 00 00 N 01 O, O, O1 w Ap A A A N N N N C rmn O r M x �n � uo o C z� r C� o rC x�� l� m 't a m a O zrxn r �r6> m�dd _mr"cn cn y� ��yr >> cn r - 7�armb mm O zy 1:- r r z 0 0 z n O m 7y p Q Q r zm to�dox r cz� o xy C a > y a d oyza a o z�rzoPtora � C,azzM gdd a17zzozooa bdpcn It-t x Mm a [+ ydrr +� Hz a>�y > -'I cn o� m > > a w— W — W W N W W W W w W b w w W W w W W W W W O O CD N CD CD�-' O O O O O CDW CD O CD O O O CD CDO O O v, O, O, W A O, W A A A A A O A A A A A A A A A A A O O A cn O A O O— N IJ W N to W a, to O N N w A A to A LA O ,.� O, O 00 O v, W Q N N A N O O, O, O 1! O, amaraa y,�y,4y C4 �N�yy�y= n „ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x o m m m m m C m m m m m m m m m m m �C 7a4 C :0 cn cn cn cn cn m cn (n cn cn cn cn cn cn v) cn cn cn cn cn y it a a N w 0 -n r -n y -TI -Tj p a -n --rj -n -fj -n � _O n �n -n -t -,I-,I -,I -n -t -t d x d n 0 d mG mG mG d d d d d O d m y m Q m m a C m m m try m m y m m m m m m m m m m a rar rrz rrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrr a o a a a -< w -G ,o 'C �-C oo � -C �C �C �-C C �-G � �G �C -G �-C �-C �-C G •C -C �C 00 00 a a a a 41 N a a a a a a a> a a a a 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0o W o0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W w w W w W w w w W w w W W N w W W W W D m z D m y z r Z m D m U) CO r m N r °O d -h C a � N u N u i A a% � 7 CD a o C Z3 o (p S'N a 3 C Q n D C o 3 — 3 GQ• O D CL CD CD CO) N CD CO) E z m ZD L c to A � o CL LO N N d C O0) � a N J 11 00 M O O 00 O\ M CD O 00 O\ M CD CD 00 Q\ M NZ CDO 00 01 ao V) U) M CDO 00 a,p N .-. N r- M M O 00 01 \p p M O O 00 O\ M \o CD 00 F M O 00 F CDM 00� ¢ O 00 � CDO O � M O 00 * 333�,�3��3`�Q¢3 O H 3�33Q3rup03 00 0000 ,--i 3 3 3 °, 3 ¢ 3 ¢ 3 0 H ¢ 3 0 3 o ¢ 3 3 w Q 3 3 ¢ 3 ¢ 3 ¢ ¢ 3 w W ¢ 3 ¢ 3 0 a�a¢zawc7aHO 3 x C7 w z O aaa > 0 0�� as aOwwa r Q w Q Q H w¢ Q A w Q w Q W Q Q W Q O w w ww t w U. w x ww� vn Cn w M �k 3 ¢ ww F� H � 3 to N Q Ww� c 3 �� Q >>� a¢ U> w > A H U> w¢ F ��tn w w a x Li x M- x M M z rq M O M F- wM > x, W ¢ x- LL oo X oo F .�. M OM t�� ✓ �o ~ ¢¢ H E y " ] ] M M M M N M )n O d' O = ON N M O� O — M O M= M O M M \O M O M= 0 m 0 CD "D O\ O O\ O � )n t O M O M O M )n N O kn �--� M t, \D 00 O M M O t— N O M CL M M W) DD 00 t— ¢ U N o M J a U p w W a 3 O U a w H w w> a U 0a = x Q a � U W H ¢ a U U z �� � CZ a w H O + x ¢ _ PC pw�¢zo+Q ¢ z w z a 3 z° d ¢¢ s tn¢,"�w�.�z0 4 x w> z O �¢au H w a w¢ - aawwz w Q x A w L a 3 a 3 a w a p¢ 3 w u O Z ti 3 u w 3 a a z a a° (n° a ] - o O 0 )n O 0 \D O 0 t- O 0 00 O 0 ON O 0 O .-. 0 = 0 N �--� 0 M_ 0 t ,--i 0 W) 0 �o •--� 0 t- .� to O C) Vn ^ 0 O M 0 v' M 0 o "t 0 o_ 0 M �--� Cr" o M "N )n M o N - O O �p O O �D O O \p O O �D O O lD O O �O O O \O O O �D O O \O O O \D O O �D O O \O O O \O O CC �D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O [_- O O O O J { O N O N O N a) N O V) N O kn N O to N 0 kn N 0 to N 0 to N CDO Wn N �n N O kn N O v-) N M O to N M CD v) N M O to N M CD In N M O v) N 00 to to N DD kn V) N M kn o0 r M kn 00 r M 'n 00 r 40 Lk V am d N O c.� I.f N cn co 0 co a) rn A ; • + • • + • • `+ + + y • U) N ^N, W L V Q ^N W m Z ca CL x Im 0 am c J � 1 00 n �Y N M O O 00 011 ¢ M O O 00 ON ¢ C D O O 00 O� Q K1 CD O 00 0',01 Q M O Cl 00 Q¢ M CD O 00 ON O0 C1 CD O 00 O% Q C D CD Cl 00 C\ Q KI CD O 00 ON Q M CD O 00 01 Q M CDO O 00 ON Q M N M O 00 a1 Q¢ M CD O 00 O� M O O 00 01 Q M O O 00 ON Q M CD O 00 O� Q M CD O DD O� Q kn p CD 0, M CD O DO ON Q M O O DD � Q CD O O 00 O1 Q C D O O DD ON Q M O O 00 O� Q M O O 00 CN Q p N¢¢ M O O 00 C, M O O 00 O\ M O O 00 01 Q M O O CO 01 Q * Li 3 3 A 33333�33333N�333333°�333333�333 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A> z 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A w a 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 A A 3 A 3 A 3 A 3 3 A i H w Z J (� w Q �3 x (, W U a O O zzzzz -a x O M � �--� r� x O M uo �O C) � .--i -7 �. 00 O M cn DD CD--� � .--� x O M V) O �--i N- 4t x O M U N --� V r. .�--i �C, O f� � � zzzzz .a .T. O M ul � - �--� O M cn 00 �--i d' �--� O cn on O " — O M on �O N It �--i O M 00 N 'R .--� M jC O L� O (]y uzzzzz>- cn z O a oo ON = kn � x 0 M cn V M - �--� ra x 0 M Ln �D M � .--� � x 0 M (n oo M� d' ,--i x 0 M 0� O � ,--� x 0 M N �--i -- R4. H , N N O� N w Wzzzzzw > Q O N �--i M .a x 0 �� kn 0 �--� x 0 [� 0 .--i ra x 0 U) ON 0 � �-. x 0 U) � d' .-. � z 0- Ln M - �--� Q v> NO ,� O U w Q > Ln _ b N zzx x O M a1 ,-� .Ti 0 M '" N �--� x Q) U 11, C1-i U U a v O O O O M M Q 88 C*O C/) U W Z N N O O z O U U U U O 0 3 w � x x z ¢ x ¢ z w w O A Q w En o x x+ o o w o 0 z o z x Q w v 0 �' x N a w m O o cz7 O¢ Ow Q z¢ w A 3 az�'Qz¢�>Wow`aoo�¢Az�a>33 c� a zw xUxwc7 �a Q z�LLJ oxo w Nz¢ w N PC a w ¢ A a w 0 0 w O w O w W A¢ u� cn O w C7 3 5G A"4� U. a> A F- cn as H aG x 2 a U U a w as 3 0 - CD N CO CD CD CD v LO (D ti w M O N ( CD CD OM � CD U) COO O� CO M O N CD CD M v LCD Orn (O f'- 0CD CD 00 M O N CD CD M O O O O O O O O O r r r c- r r T r r r N N N N N N N N N N M M co m OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L() Lo Lo U) L() LO L() Ln Lo U) Ln LO L() L-C) LO to Lo LO U.) LO Lo Lo Lf') Lf') LO U) LO Lo L() Lo Ln LO Ln J O (A O (A O O O O CA (A (A 0) (A (A O O O O O O O O O O CA O (A (A O (A (A O d) u (` �rl_ ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti� r— ti ti r— ti r-1�- ti ti r— ti ti ti ti ti r N r— ti � r- a O0 00 CO CO co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 OO a0 OO co 00 CO 00 00 00 00 00 QO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO (D (O (0 (O (D (O (O (O (O (O (O (O CO co (O (D (0 Cc) CO (O (D (O CO (O CO (O (D (O (O co (O (D O O O O O O O O O O O O O Co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r N (M T LO (O I- M (A O r N (M Ln O ti 00 O O r N M"T LO (O 00 (A O r N Cl) r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N N N N M M M co (Q (D N O W (A (A (3) (n Cn Cn U7 Cn (n (n C.T. Cn Cn A? A A A A A A A +- W W Cl) W W W N — O (0 00 4 M Cn A W N — O (D (b —1 (A Cn A co N — O (D OD -I CA Cn A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o (n (n CA (A (A (A (A (A (A (3) (A (A 0) CA o O 01) 00 00 (b 00 0D (b 0V 00 00 00 00 (n (n (n m (n cn (n (n (n m (n (n (n (n (n o Co -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 v -4 -4 -4 -4 -4 v r A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A 0 0 (4 (o Co Co O (.o (o (o (o Co CO (o O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O (n (n (n (n (n (n (n (n cn (r (n (n p O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O s — — — s O O O O O O Co O O O O A A A A A A W co W co W co Cn A co N" O (0 W -I M (n A W N" N— Cn A W N 3 O (D 00 -I (A Cn A O O O O O O co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O -0 (n -a a -n --i O bd (n H O 7C r N a N to (n -v w w w m to w td �a�m HxzH��mmCZ7mG�m-m�.dy 7Hd CH�im�+ HH O xCm7 xm rr�mpzxmbry r r r r r rr rr� 7T = " tl O m rm m m m m m Cn t7" aaa O z(n r `v r r r r r rMCl) a aydD oo� raxaa a m zr x O t- r rz t0 a tl z d �c a G O O O O O O O O "rC m m m O + t7 r m a °a a °> o ,°a ° a a < a -rG a ra rarraryrrary(nara �g� D z O O O O O O r 0 O r z C7 Y Y a a a a `c Y Y m °rd (n (f) (n (n (4 (/) cn (n CA C/) C/) On Cl) coo cn z z z z z z z w O w O w O w O w O w O w O N N O W O W O W O (A 110 W O W O N w O A W O A A W w w W W W W O O O O O O O A D 00 N 00 N 00 w 00 W 00 W 00 W 00 W A W A t 00 A 00 A 00 A (JA w 00 Cn 00 (n LA O W O W LA O � .� w LA to -A "A (li LA LA O O O O O O O �- N — O (.n \10 A w �.n (n A (n cl� A A A A A A A (nCO � H H H H H H H `C H H H= H H H H C:la 0 0 a a a a a a a w 00 m w 00 C� 00 00 n n n n n n n v�d�v�dbbb�^r"�db b b v�dax xx -•x C rrrrrrr~�Orr r�rrr<r nrr n n n n n n c�rr z (n (n (n (n (n (n (n HO (n (n (n (n (n (n m z y z Z x .� x x x x z m w o H> Z 4 LA a H (n (n W (n (n (n (n (n N -rl 't t7 t7 -11 C7 ht t7 -n t7 -11 t7 '11 t7 b -0 7d 'TJ C7 -rj C7 �n b (n a 't r -1 d tj (n -rn C7 -t C7 171 t7 't t7 III C7 It C7 `n C7 It t7 `n t7 It t7 'n t7 '11 t7 'TJ t7 D p m m m m m m m r H m m m H m m m m m m m m m m rn m m m m rrrrrrrryzrr a a a a a a r o a a rmrrrr a a a a a rrr a s r a r a r a r a r a r a rr a a r •t �C a a �G a �C a -C a �C a �G a m 7d N �C a -< a �C a � �C a -< a � -C a �C a � a �C a � a � a � a �C a -< a �G a �G a �C a -C a m N �O \.O 00 00 O O \0 00 O �o w O �o 00 O �o 00 O �o 00 O �p 00 N � 00 O "0 00 O � 00 O � 00 O � 00 O �, 00 \.o 00 O �O 00 O (o 00 O �0 00 O �D 00 O �0 00 O �O 00 O I'O 00 O 110 00 O \O 00 O \0 00 O 110 00 O �o 00 O O O W W O W O W O W O W O W O W 00 O W O W O W O W O W O W O W Cl W O W O W O W O W O W Cl W O W O W O W O W _r N (Q O h 91) a� O z 3 CD y 4) CL D CL CL IN CD N N N 00 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O N Cl O M O O O O O O O O O O � O O O O O d O CDO00 00 Cl O O o 0 o O o CD CD o C. O o 0 0 0 o O CD CD O 3 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 w 00 00 00 00 00 00 w Z a¢¢Cl¢ ¢a¢¢a¢¢¢¢¢�°`¢ J 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 w 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ¢ 3 w o w w w w w w w w w w w w w w¢ w w w w w w w w w w¢ w w w (n M N �-� � r 41- N N 4t N N M A M�k Mkt Mkt = T. Z R *k k 4t 4k U) 4t k W W vo U� CO (n cnCf) on uoC/) W En U) F� z a E� E- F- E� C/) F 00 W F" z a a a a a aa, a a a a d a a Q��� x� x�>cn � x A 00 w 00 3 000 M 00 Q w H O 00, F F F" F E" H F H 00 o 0 o F" o N o 0 0� O O M m M m O m M m M M-� � .M-i M M z M �7 M G7 M ,�C M M M N M W — N — � N q — N O.4 2 V7 M - (3� V ) Vl M C� [-- V7 rn .-ti Cn V U] O Cn M Vl O Cn G7 00 (n 07 O 0 U7 O O O O O \.o r vl M CT m kr) M N 01 (- O� --� 0 00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 M �--� N �,c N M r+ r- O O 1.0 O O O O O N O O O O O O O O N Vl N N N M N a N M Ni N CT Q M M Cl) M Cl) M M M M M M M M ^ N - - ti ¢ C) Q O x � a z +. WW >" OA ¢ U ¢ Qa' Z a U H �¢ x d z ¢w �Ow `�~w�wxx0+� w� a¢ En U Z>°z�Qz3�"w¢c7dzoQv OfWF xavv¢ WA�O��¢zQa° `9nWv��¢�„au�aZ } xx Oa> z x m z 3� c� O u; x 4? N O O O O Q O Z (nti U O m d o O o 0 0 0 o O o(D o O O o o O o O o C> a O d O O a Co G O 0 (D t` O0 D) O r N M q Lo (D I-- 00 CA o r N CM 'IT LO (D 1- OD 0') a r N co (V N N (V N N N N N N cM CO C) M (M M M M CO) M';r Nt 'Cr q F- o(D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c) o o v o a o o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 o v a v a o v v v v v v v v v v v v� v v v qT v qt v�� rtr v Nr Nr Iq tr v LO LO LO Ln in U') LO (n U') LO LO LO U') U')Ln (n (n in LO LO U')Ln LO W) U') LO LO LO 1.0 r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r Y' r r r E r F-o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v v Q o a (-Do o a (-D � M IT (n (D ti M M o r N M'gr U) (D f- M M O r N M In (fl ti 00 M O r (D (D (D (D (D (D (D 1- I- r-- ti t` r- ti ti ti I,- co co co co c0 00 co co OO co m CA M 0 M On DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ATTN SEPA REVIEW PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 1904 3RD AVE STE 105 SEATTLE WA 98101-3317 sepa@pscleanair.org claudewapscleanair.org SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1 sT AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 chris.ingham@southkingfire.org gordon.goodsell@southkingfire.org KENT CITY HALL PLANNING DEPT 220 4T" AVE S KENT WA 98032 iistorical Society of Federal Way '645 S 312th St. =ederal Way, WA 98003 RAMON PAZOOKI WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY PO BOX 330310 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov TANYA NASCIMENTO FW PUBLIC SCHOOLS 31405 18T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 tnascime@fwps.org BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 brandon.re non u allu tribe.com CITY OF DES MOINES ATTN.' Planning Dept. 21630 11T" AVE S DES MOINES WA 98198 Julie Koler King County Historic Preservation DNRP 201 S. Jacksor Seattle, WA 98 all f�� Env,ronm�n�� C�2Gk I S DEPT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 gretchen.kaehier@dahp.wa.gov BRIAN ASBURY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basbury@lakehaven.org LAURA MURPHY TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015 172ND AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us LORI KITTREDGE METRO TRANSIT KSC-TR-0413 201 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 Washington Trust for Historic Preservation AnnA RA:--- A..--..- Doc. I.D. Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 4:21 PM To: 'sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov'; 'sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov'; 'larry.fisher@dfw.wa.gov'; 'steve.bottheim@kingcounty.gov'; 'pesha.klein@kingcounty.gov'; 'Brian Asbury' Subject: Weyerhaeuser Way S Roundabout NOA & Opt DNS Attachments: Weyco Roundabout NOA + Opt DNS.pdf Attached is an NOA & Opt DNS for Weyerhaeuser Way S @ S 344th Way Roundabout Improvements. Please contact Senior Planner Deb Barker at 253-835-2642 or deb. barker@ cityoffederalway.com for questions. Tamara Fix A&ni n -Asst. city of F'ederaC` vay tamara.6'x@lcityoffederalwam.com 'When life gives you a hundred reasons to cry, show life that you have a thousand reasons to smile." Unknown CRY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Federal Way High School Replacement Project Description: Replacement of the existing Federal Way High School with a new 232,000 square -foot facility. Additional improvements associated with the replacement include parking reconfiguration, ball fields, tennis courts, stormwater flow control/treatment, and landscaping. The existing high school building and pool building will be demolished. Applicant: Rod Leland - Facilities Director, Federal Way Public Schools Project Location: 30611 16`s Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 APN 082104-9001 Date Application Received: March 10, 2014 Date Determined Complete: April 3, 2014 Date of Notice of Application: April 4, 2014 Comment Due Date: April 21, 2014 Vicinity Map Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits/Files Under Review: Use Process III (File #14-101058-UP), Concurrency (File #14-101060-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #14-101059-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Wellhead Protection Area Map, Environmental Checklist, Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement, Preliminary Technical Information Report and Traffic Impact Analysis. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy;' Title 16 `Surface Water Management;' and Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2014. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file, existing environmental documents and required studies are available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8`b Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Senior Planner, 253-835-2638 Doc. I.D. 65210 CITY OF ` Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www. ci tvof Fed e ralway.c om DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION r l _ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) 31 Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ �m�ailed� ❑ faxed Ae-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2014. Project Name File Number(s) hl- )bl b5; Signature Cc� _ - - Date K:\CD Administration Hes\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /22/2014 2:40:00 PM Tamara Fix From: Jennifer Anderson <jnderson@fedwaymirror.com> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 10:08 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Legal Notice Got it, thanks! Jennifer Anderson Advertising Sales Consultant Office: 253-925-5565, Ext 3056 Internal: 02-3056 Fax: 253-925-5750 31919 1 st Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 121 Sound Publishing, Inc. Map Print Rates Online Rates Media Kit sound Info On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Tamara Fix <Tamara.Fixaa,ci offederalwa .comma wrote: Please publish the following legal notice (FW High School NOA & Opt DNS, 14-101058) in Friday's (April 4, 2013) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. Thanks! Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Federal Way High School Replacement sub,ectPron Project Description: Replacement of the existing Federal Way High School with a new 232,000 square -foot facility. Additional improvements associated with the replacement include parking reconfiguration, ball fields, tennis courts, stormwater flow control/treatment, and landscaping. The existing high school building and pool building will be demolished. Applicant: Rod Leland - Facilities Director, Federal Way Public Schools Project Location: 30611 16th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. APN 082104-9001 Date Application Received: March 10, 2014 ' Date Determined Complete: April 3, 2014 Date of Notice of Application: April 4, 2014 Comment Due Date: April 21, 2014 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits/Files Under Review: Use Process III (File #14-101058-UP), Concurrency (File #14-101060-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #14-101059-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Wellhead Protection Area Map, Environmental Checklist, Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement, Preliminary Technical Information Report and Traffic Impact Analysis. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy;' Title 16 `Surface Water Management;' and Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2014. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file, existing environmental documents and required studies are available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 8tn Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Senior Planner, 253-835-2638 www.nw-ads.com , I — Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Federal Way High School Replace- ment Subject PropertyProject Description: Replacement of the existing Federal Way High School with a new 232,000 square -foot facility. Additional Improve- ments assoclaled with the replacement include parking reconfiguration, ball fields, tennis courts, slormwater flow controUtreatment, and landscap- ing. The existing high school building and pool building will be demolished. Applicant: Rod Leland - Facilities Director, Federal Way Public Schools Project Location: 30611 161in Avenue South, Fed- eral Way, WA 98003. APN 082104.9001 Date Application Received: March 10, 2014 Date Delermtned Complete: April 3, 2014 Date of Notice of Application: April 4, 2014 Comment Due Date: April21, 2014 Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other infor- mation on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse Impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determina- tion of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process In WAC 19T-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to cam - men! on the environmental impacts of the pro- posed project. The proposal may include mitiga- tion measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitiga- tion measures regardless of whether an environ- mental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, lnbes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed pro]eet and Its probable environmental Impacts. Comments must be submlhed by the date noted above. PermU Iles Under Review: Use Process III (File 414.101058-UP), Concurrency (File 114-101060• CN), and Slate Environmental Policy Act Threshold Dole rmi ation(File►14.101059•SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Wellhead Protection Area Map, Emrlron• mental Checklist, Hazardous Materials inventory Statement, Preliminary Technical Information Re- port and Traffic Impact Analysis. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitiga- tion: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, 'Environmemai Pollcy; Title 16'Surface Water Management;' and Title 19 'Zoning and Develop- ment Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may sub- mit written comments regarding the land use ap- pl"ipn or the environmental impacts of the pro- posal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m, on April 21, 2014. Only persons who submit written comments to the DI. rector (address below) or spectlicatly request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any Interested party may appeal the envi- ronmental threshold determination. Details of ap- peal procedures for the requested land use deci- sion will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be Issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant ad- verse impacts that were not considered by the No- tice of Optional Determination of Noosigniticance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. AvailabNty of File: The official project file, existing environmental documents and required studies are available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development Depart- ment, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Senior Planner, 253-835-2638 Published in the Federal Way Mirror April4, 2014 FWM 2129 RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT '{' r r MAY 0 5 2014 C [ 31919 1 n Ave S, Suite 101^I Federal, Way, WA 98003 1253.925.5565 1253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way — Economic Development as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive weeks(s), commencing on the 4th day of April 2014 , and ending on the 4th day of April 2014 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 161.50, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.020. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 22nd day of April 2014. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Buckley ����ER A ANa ■ffJ U NOTARY ' PUBLIC •�• WAS�`��. CRY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION AND OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIEFICANCE (DNS) Project Name: Federal Way High School Replacement Project Description: Replacement of the existing Federal Way High School with a new 232,000 square -foot facility. Additional improvements associated with the replacement include parking reconfiguration, ball fields, tennis courts, stormwater flow controVtreatment, and landscaping. The existing high school building and pool building will be demolished. Applicant: Rod Leland - Facilities Director, Federal Way Public Schools Project Location: 30611 16'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. APN 082104-9001 Date Application Received: March 10, 2014 Date Determined Complete: April 3, 2014 Date of Notice of Application: April 4, 2014 Comment Due Date: April 21, 2014 Vicinity Map Environmental Review: Based upon review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City, it is likely that the City of Federal Way will determine that the project will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and expects to issue a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be your only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an environmental impact statement (EIS) is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold determination for the specific proposal may be obtained upon request. Agencies, tribes, and the public are encouraged to review and comment on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. Comments must be submitted by the date noted above. Permits/Files Under Review: Use Process III (File #14-101058-UP), Concurrency (File #14-101060-CN), and State Environmental Policy Act Threshold Determination (File #14-101059-SE) Existing Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Wellhead Protection Area Map, Environmental Checklist, Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement, Preliminary Technical Information Report and Traffic Impact Analysis. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code Title 14, `Environmental Policy;' Title 16 `Surface Water Management;' and Title 19 `Zoning and Development Code.' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments regarding the land use application or the environmental impacts of the proposal to the Director of Community and Economic Development by 5:00 p.m. on April 21, 2014. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. However, any interested party may appeal the environmental threshold determination. Details of appeal procedures for the requested land use decision will be included with the written decision. Issuance of Final Environmental Determination: The final Determination of Nonsignificance may be issued without a second comment period, unless timely comments identify probable significant adverse impacts that were not considered by the Notice of Optional Determination of Nonsignificance. A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance may be obtained upon request. Availability of File: The official project file, existing environmental documents and required studies are available for public review at the Department of Community and Economic Development Department, 33325 S'b Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Senior Planner, 253-83572638 Doc. I.D. 65210 CITY OF � Federal April 3, 2014 Chad Weiser Otak Inc 10230 NE Points Drive, #400 Kirkland, WA 98033 CITY HALL Way 8th Avenue SouthFeder Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com RE: File #14-101058-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Federal Way High School, 30611 161h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Weiser: The Community and Economic Development Department is in receipt of your March 10, 2014, Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application and environmental checklist for the proposed replacement of the Federal Way High School. Your proposal includes a new 232,000sf building, renovated sports fields and courts, parking, stormwater control/treatment, street improvements and landscaping. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045, within 28 days of receiving an MLU application, the city shall determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence a formal Letter of Complete Application. The Process III MLU application is deemed complete as of April 3, 2014. This determination of completeness is based on a review of your submittal relative to applicable requirements referenced within FWRC 19.15.040, "Development application submittal requirements." This notice of complete application does not represent any form of preliminary approval of the proposed site plan. A 120-day time line for reviewing the environmental checklist and Process III application has started as of this date. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line will be stopped any time the city requests corrections and/or additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that corrections and/or additional information are needed. Development review staff will follow up with a combined technical response letter within four to six weeks of this letter. Comments regarding the site and building design, landscaping, stormwater, and public improvements will be included in the technical letter. PUBLIC NOTICE The Notice of Application will be distributed within 14 days of this letter as follows: (1) at least one notice will be posted at the subject property; (2) one copy will be posted at each of the official notification boards; (3) one copy will be published in the Federal Way Mirror, and (4) a copy will be mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. The department also has the responsibility to notify other agencies that may have jurisdiction over your development project or an interest in it. The Mr. Weiser April 3, 2014 Page 2 department is issuing the notice under the optional DNS process and will use a single integrated comment period to obtain comments on the notice of application and the likely threshold determination for the proposal. CLOSING If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or matt.herrera@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely Matthew Herrera, AICP Senior Planner enc: NOA/DNS c: Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Sarady Long, Senior Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District 14-101058 Doc. I.D. 65311 CITY OF — Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Federal Way High School Replacement FILE No:14-101059-00-SE Proposal: Replacement of the existing Federal Way High School with a new 232,000 square -foot facility. Additional improvements associated with the replacement include parking reconfiguration, ball fields, tennis courts, stormwater flow control/treatment, and landscaping. The existing high school building and pool building will be demolished. Proponent: Rod Leland - Facilities Director, Federal Way Public Schools Location: 30611 16`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. APN 082104-9001 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way - Community Development Department Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Senior Planner; 253-835-2638 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Two written comments related to cultural resources and transportation were received in response to the 14-day comment period that ended April 21 2014. There is no further comment Reriod on the DNS. SEPA Conditions The city's adopted SEPA policies set forth in FWRC 14.25.070 serve as the basis for the city to exercise its substantive authority and to condition the proposed action as it relates to potential adverse impacts that would result from this proposal. The following policies support the condition: FWRC 14.25.070(2)(d) Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage. King County Countywide Planning Policy DP-41 Preserve significant historic,- archeological, cultural, architectural, artistic, and environmental features, especially where growth could place these resources at risk. Where appropriate, designate individual features or areas for protection or restoration. Encourage land use patterns and adopt regulations that protect historic resources and sustain historic community character. NEG1 To preserve the City's natural systems in order to protect public health, safety, and welfare, and to maintain the integrity of the natural environment. NEP 1 Protect and restore environmental quality through land use plans, surface water management plans and programs, comprehensive park plans, and development review. (Emphasis added) 14-101059 Doc I.D. 65475 Based on the above policies, the following mitigation measures are required to mitigate potential adverse impacts due to the proposal's proximity to: (1) Cold Creek, Steel Lake and Redondo Beach and the potential for the site to contain cultural resources; and (2) Tacoma Smelter Plume with the potential for elevated arsenic and lead levels in site soils. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit, the applicant shall submit a cultural resource assessment, prepared by a qualified professional, to the Community Development Department and Brandon Reynon of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians. Any needed mitigation and/or avoidance measures shall be designed based upon the results of the survey, in consultation with the Puyallup Tribe and Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a soil sampling and cleanup report per the Tacoma Smelter Plume Model Remedies Guidance. If soil contaminants are found to be elevated per the guidance, the applicant shall remedy the soils per the guidance as a component of the grading permit and then submit a written approval of cleanup (No Further Action) from the Department of Ecology following completion of the grading activities. The No Further Action document shall be submitted to the department prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Appeals Any person aggrieved this final determination may file an appeal with the city within 14 days. An appeal must be filed with the Federal Way City Clerk (address below), no later than 5:00 P.M. on May 29, 2014, stating the reasons for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make factual objections. Responsible Official: Planning Manager Isaac Conlen for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community Development Address: , 33325 8th Avenue South, 2nd Flr, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: May 15, 2014 Signature: 14-101059 Doc I.D. 65475 V�'tl�L CITY OF �. Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Chad Weiser May 15, 2014 Otak Inc 10230 NE Points Drive, #400 Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: File #14-101059-00-SE; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Federal Way High School Replacement, 3061110 Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Weiser: The city and jurisdictional agencies have reviewed the environmental checklist submitted with the Federal Way High School Replacement Master Land Use (MLU) application. It has been determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) with conditions is enclosed. The Optional DNS Process was used to review this proposal. The 14-day comment period required by SEPA Rules ended April 21, 2014. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-355, a second comment period is not required upon issuance of the DNS. The enclosed DNS was issued on May 15, 2014. The city will provide a copy of the DNS to the Department of Ecology, agencies with jurisdiction, Puyallup and Muckleshoot tribes, those who commented on the proposal, and anyone that requests a copy. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the issuance of the DNS. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period, which ends May 29, 2014. The decision not to require an EIS does not grant the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the city. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions have been imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts which are based on adopted and designated city policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as permitted in RCW 43.21 C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. The city is not responsible for publishing the Notice of Action. Questions regarding the environmental review component should be directed to me at 253-835-2638 or matt.herreraa,cityoffederalwa c m. Sincerel §��� Matthew Herrera, AICP Senior Planner enc: DNS w/ conditions c: w/ DNS: Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Doc LD 65575 CITY OFr Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98006 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.dt offederalwa .corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other was gmailed ❑ faxed s 2014. Project Name File Number(s) ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Xe-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on -ib/bs Signature ate- Date �g`/ K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /22/2014 2:40:00 PM CITY OF _- -- Federal Way DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Federal Way High School Replacement FILE No:14-101059-00-SE Proposal: Replacement of the existing Federal Way High School with a new 232,000 square -foot facility. Additional improvements associated with the replacement include parking reconfiguration, ball fields, tennis courts, stormwater flow control/treatment, and landscaping. The existing high school building and pool building will be demolished. Proponent: Rod Leland - Facilities Director, Federal Way Public Schools Location: 30611 16`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. APN 082104-9001 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way - Community Development Department Staff Contact: Matthew Herrera — Senior Planner; 253-835-2638 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the enviromnent. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.2 1 C.03 0(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public, on request. This DAIS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Two written comments related to cultural resources and transportation were received in response to the 14-day comment period that ended April 21, 2014- There is no further comment period on the DNS. SEPA Conditions The city's adopted SEPA policies set forth in FWRC 14.25.070 serve as the basis for the city to exercise its substantive authority and to condition the proposed action as it relates to potential adverse impacts that would result from this proposal. The following policies support the condition: FWRC 14.25.070(2)(d) Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage. King County Countywide Planning Policy DP-41 Preserve significant historic, archeological, cultural, architectural, artistic, and environmental features, especially where growth could place these resources at risk. Where appropriate, designate individual features or areas for protection or restoration. Encourage land use patterns and adopt regulations that protect historic resources and sustain historic community character. NEG1 To preserve the City's natural systems in order to protect public health, safety, and welfare, and to maintain the integrity of the natural environment. NEP1 Protect and restore environmental quality through land use plans, surface water management plans and programs, comprehensive park plans, and development review. (Emphasis added) 14-101059 Doc. I.D. 65475 Based on the above policies, the following mitigation measures are required to mitigate potential adverse impacts due to the proposal's proximity to: (1) Cold Creek, Steel Lake and Redondo Beach and the potential for the site to contain cultural resources; and (2) Tacoma Smelter Plume with the potential for elevated arsenic and lead levels in site soils. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit, the applicant shall submit a cultural resource assessment, prepared by a qualified professional, to the Community Development Department and Brandon Reynon of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians. Any needed mitigation and/or avoidance measures shall be designed based upon the results of the survey, in consultation with the Puyallup Tribe and Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a soil sampling and cleanup report per the Tacoma Smelter Plume Model Remedies Guidance. If soil contaminants are found to be elevated per the guidance, the applicant shall remedy the soils per the guidance as a component of the grading permit and then submit a written approval of cleanup (No Further Action) from the Department of Ecology following completion of the grading activities. The No Further Action document shall be submitted to the department prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Appeals Any person aggrieved this final determination may file an appeal with the city within 14 days. An appeal must be filed with the Federal Way City Clerk (address below), no later than 5:00 P.M. on May 29, 2014, stating the reasons for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make factual objections. Responsible Official: Planning Manager Isaac Conlen for Patrick Doherty, Director of Community Development Address: 33325 8th Avenue South, 2"a Flr, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date Issued: May 15 2014 Signature: 14-101059 Doc I D 65475 DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov ATTN SEPA REVIEW PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 1904 3RD AVE STE 105 SEATTLE WA 98101-3317 sepa@pscleanair.org claudew@pseleanair.org SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1 ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 chris.ingham@southkingfire.org gordon.goodsell@southkingfire.org KENT CITY HALL PLANNING DEPT 220 4T" AVE S KENT WA 98032 r,torical Society of Federal Way 45 S 312th St. !deral Way, WA 98003 John O. Weise 30405 11th Ave S. Federal Way, WA 98003 DNS to the following: RAMON PAZOOKI DEPT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & WSDOT SOUTH KING COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION PO BOX 330310 PO BOX 48343 SEATTLE WA 98133-9710 OLYMPIA WA 98504-8343 ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov gretchen.kaehier@dahp.wa.gov TANYA NASCIMENTO FW PUBLIC SCHOOLS 31405 18T" AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 tnascime@fwps.org BRANDON REYNON PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA 98404 brandon.reynon �puyallu tribe.com CITY OF DES MOINES ATTN: Planning Dept. 21630 11 "-'AVE S DES MOINES WA 98198 Julie Koler King County Historic Preservation DNRP 201 S. Jackson Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 BRIAN ASBURY LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 basbury@lakehaven.org LAURA MURPHY TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE 39015 172ID AVE SE AUBURN WA 98092 laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us LORI KITTREDGE METRO TRANSIT KSC-TR-0413 201 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3856 Washington Trust for Historic Preservation 1204 Minor Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 Doc. I.D. Tamara Fix From: Tamara Fix Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 2:22 PM To: sepau nit@ ecy.wa.gov'; 'ra min. pazooki @wsdot.wa.gov'; 'gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov'; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; claudew@pscleanair.org; tnascime@fwps.org; 'basbury@lakehaven.org'; Chris Ingham; Gordon Goodsell; 'brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com';'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us' Cc: Matt Herrera Subject: Federal Way High School Replacement DNS Attachments: 20140515141500.pdf Attached is the DNS for the Federal Way High School Replacement project. This is being issued on May 15, 2014, and the Senior Planner for the project is Matt Herrera, 253-835-2638, matt.herrera@citvoffederalway.com. FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT PROJECT WAC 197-11-964 Environmental checklist, RECEIVED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST MAR 10 2014 Purpose of checklist: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C R % requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." in addition, complete the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: Federal Way High School Replacement 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way Public Schools Attn: Rod Leland, Facilities Director TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Federal Way Public Schools Attn: Rod Leland, Facilities Director 3140518"' Avenue South. Federal Way, WA 98003 4. Date checklist prepared: March 7, 2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase I approximately November 2014 - March 2016. Phase 2 approximately March 2016- August 2017. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No other additions or expansions other than those described in item 6 above. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Transportation Impact Analysis prepared by Heath Associates Geotechnical Investigation prepared by AESI 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. There are no other government approvals for this project pending at this time. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Process III Land Use Approval — (City of Federal Way) EN Permit (Public Roadways) — (City of Federal Way) Building Permit — (City of Federal Way) NPDES Permit — (Washington State DOE) Utility Permits — (Lakehaven Utility District) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The proposed project replaces the existing Federal Way High School at its current location. The new comprehensive high school will be approximately 232, 000 SF and will house approximately 1,600 students in three stories. Site developments include a large courtyard and several secondary courts, ball fields, tennis courts, aprimary parking lot, several rain gardens and landscape features, and a large storm water facility at the west of the site. Student capacity is to remain the same, at approximately 1,600 students. 3. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. il TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located at the existing Federal Way High School, 30611 16'h Avenue S, Federal Way, WA 98003. Survey data associated with this site is included within the Process III Land Use Application. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat. rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other...... b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 40% manicured and engineered slopes exist along the perimeter of some athletic field areas. These slopes are previously developed areas established to flatten land areas for athletic fields. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. General soil type is glacial till consisting of Arents-Alderwood gravelly sandy, loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no indications or history of unstable soils in the vicinity of the project site. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be performed for construction of on -site stormwater detention facilities, new athletic fields, a new parking lot, and building pad and footings. Approximate quantities of cut and fill are 64000cy cut and 18000 cy fill. Grading in the South 304"' Street and South 308'" Street rights -of -way for sidewalk, curb and gutter, and on street parking improvements. Grading will also take place along 16'h Avenue South to for sidewalk improvements and pedestrian access to the proposed 16`h Avenue South entrance. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Best management practices will be implemented on -site for erosion control during demolition, clearing and grading, and construction of proposed improvements. With proper implementation of these techniques, erosion will be controlled. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 46 percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces, which includes building areas, parking and the proposed new roadway. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The potential for erosion during construction operations will be mitigated through the implementation of Erosion and Sediment Control Best management Practices as part of the 9 TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT 2. Air EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY construction requirements. Erosion control measures will include, but are not limited to, stabilized construction entrances, wash pads, wet weather work plans, sediment trapping, and exposed soil and site stabilization programs. Daily inspections will oversee proper implementation and functioning of the erosion and sediment control measures. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Significant portions of the construction will occur during the school year. At that time emissions from vehicles and busses for school use will remain present. During clearing and construction, emissions form construction equipment will also be likely to occur. Dust control measures will also be implemented during demolition and construction. Once construction is complete, emissions will be present from vehicles, buses, and deliveries associated with school use activities. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. There are no off -site sources of emissions or odor that will affect the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: No measure to control emissions are proposed at this time since there are minimal if any impacts. Dust control measures will be applied as necessary to limit dust impacts during construction. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Easter Lake is located south of the project, but separated by S 308'h Street. It is a manmade lake providing detention for surrounding housing developments. It has no connection to waters of the state. The west side of the Lake has an adjoining wetland, although our project limits exceed 200 feet from the wetland. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The project proposal includes street improvements to the north side of South 304'1' Street which is located within 200 feet of Easter Lake, although the lake is not regulated under the City of Federal Way Shoreline Master Program. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. The project does not propose any fill or dredge material placed or removed from surface water or wetlands. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The proposal does not require any surface water withdrawals or diversions. 4 TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The project area is not located within the 100-year floodplain as it is delineated as zone X as mapped by FEMA. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The proposal does not involve discharging of waste materials to surface waters. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn for this project. The project proposes stormwater bioretnetion facilities to manage on -site stormwater and some right-of-way stormwater from South 304`h Street. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No waste material will be discharged into the ground from this project. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Site runoff from the parking lot, driveways, building, athletic fields, and pedestrian surfaces will be collected via swales, catch basins, and other collection structures, and will be conveyed via tightline piping to water quality treatment and detention facilities. A detention pond on the western portion of the site will provide Level 3 flow control for targeted surfaces. Upstream of the detention facility, bioretention (raingardens) will provide Enhanced Basic water quality treatment to targeted PGIS surfaces. Flow discharging from the detention pond will be conveyed to the existing City of Federal Way storm drainage system within the S. 308th St. right of way. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Water quality treatment will be provided in accordance with City of Federal Way standards for runoff of all pollution generating impervious surfaces prior to releasing from the site. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Proposed measures will include flow control and runoff treatment in accordance with City of Federal Way code including bioretention facilities. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: red alder, maple, aspen, other: _evergreen tree: douglas fir, cedar, pine, other: Madrona TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT shrubs --grass EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY pasture prop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other — —other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? A majority of vegetation removal will be turf grass and shrubs from around the athletic fields and school. A stand of Fir, Cedar and Madrona trees will be removed from the north end of the site along with some Cedar trees located adjacent to the parking area at the 16"' Avenue South entrance. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no threatened or endangered species on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The proposed landscape plan will use primarily Northwest Native plants (Trees, shrubs and groundcovers) that are drought tolerant and appropriate to the site conditions in which they are planted. Refer to the landscape plans (L101-L109) for more detailed vegetation information. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no threatened or endangered species on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The project site is within the broad boundaries of the Pacific Flyway, the major migrating corridor for birds in North America, west of the Continental Divide. However, the project site itself is not a known congregation point for migrating birds. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: There are no specific proposed measures to enhance wildlife although use of native plant material will be conducive to native wildlife. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The project incorporates electric and natural gas energy usage. 0 01 TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy efficient mechanical and electrical systems, including efficient hydronic radiators will be used, and will be operated by a building management system to respond to outside climate conditions and occupant loads, including maximizing the use of outside air for non -refrigerant based cooling. No air conditioning will be used with the exception of some administration spaces that are used year-round. Operable windows will be incorporated to increase the comfort zone. High-performance envelope construction, including walls, glazing components, and roof systems will be employed. Windows are located in order to reduce the need for electric lights during the day time, and occupancy sensors will dim light fixtures when daylight is sufficient. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no environmental health hazards anticipated as a result of this proposal. 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No new special emergency services will be required for this project. The proposed High School will serve approximately the same number of students as the existing school facility. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No measures are proposed at this time. b. Noise. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, and other)? No existing noise in the area will affect the site. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. On the short-term basis, noise associated with the construction of the new buildings and site improvements will be present during normal business hours. On a long-term basis noise created by the proposed project will be similar to the current noise levels. New outdoor recreational spaces may increase noise levels around the site due to recreational activities during and after school hours and over the weekend days. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No measures are proposed at this time. 8. Land and shoreline use TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is Federal Way High School, recently rezoned from RS7.2 to Commercial Business (BC). Adjacent properties on the site are a combination of RS7.2, RM24001 RM3600, PO and BC. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. It has not been used for argriculture in over 40 years. Use prior to the current use as a high school is unknown. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site is currently comprised of the Federal Way High School building, a building that houses the Federal Way Public School Employment Transition Program, and the Food Services building. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The project proposes demolition of the existing high school and structure housing the Federal Way Public School Employment Transition Program. Structures will be demolished in coordination with phases the constructing the new building. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The zoning classification for the site is Community Business. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is Community Business. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Environmentally sensitive areas do not exist on the site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The quantity of students and employees would be similar the existing school. Approximately 1600 students are proposed to attend the school. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No displacement would occur due to the proposed project as the sites are currently vacant. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project will comply with City of Federal Way zoning and design standards which include building articulation, screening, landscape buffers and setbacks from adjacent properties. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing is proposed in association with this project. TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing will be eliminated in association with this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest height of the proposed project structure is 42 feet. The principal exterior building materials are prefinished metal panels, glass, and concrete. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views in the area will not be obstructed in any significant way. The High School building will be closer to both Pacific Highway and South 308"' Street. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The building design addresses the design standards of the City which includes consideration of building aesthetics. IL Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The project proposal will reduce light and glare compared to the existing conditions with LED parking lot lighting and an advance intelligent control module to manage light settings. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare from the finished project will not be a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? There are no off -site sources of light or glare that may affect the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The project proposal provides exterior LED lighting to reduce glare in addition to an intelligent self setting control module for dimming of lights when appropriate due to the time of day and activities occurring at the school. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? An existing football stadium facility is on -site and will remain as apart of the project proposal. Existing softball and baseball field will be reconstruction with improved drainage and surfacing. The project proposal also provides a multisport soccer field and four tennis courts. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPL/CANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY The proposed project will remove three tennis courts and an outdated athletic field and dirt running track. The new athletic facilities will improve the recreational opportunities at the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Proposed measures to enhance recreation opportunities on -site include a baseball field, softball field, four tennis courts, and a multisport soccer field. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. This site is not a known historical site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No known evidence of historic, archeological, scientific or cultural evidence has been found on site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: No measures are proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project proposal maintains use of the existing public street access locations at South 304"' Street, South 308"' Street, and 16'h Avenue South. Surface improvements are proposed to the existing egress and ingress locations on South 304"' Street, South 308"' Street, and 16t" Avenue South. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? King County Metro currently serves the site with transit stops east of the sit on SR 99 and with a stop on South 308"' Street at 14"' Avenue South. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project proposes 630 parking stalls. The proposal will eliminate approximately 400 parking stalls. Some of the existing parking stalls will be removed and replaced with new surfacing. Those stalls are included in the existing and proposed parking stall quantities. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The project proposes right-of-way improvements to construction curb, gutter, and on street parking on south side of South 304"' Street and the north side of South 308"' Street. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The proposal is not in the immediate vicinity of water, rail or air transportation. 10 TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The project proposal projects no new trips generated since the enrollment of the new school will remain the same as the old school. Vehicular circulation will be consolidated by designating two primary access locations on South 308"' Street and South 304`h Street. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The project proposes right-of-way street improvements on the south side of South 308`�' Street and the north side of South 304"' Street to provide on -street parking. Site access will be concentration to two main access entrances at South 304"' Street and South 308"' Street. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project will not result in an increase in need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. On -site stormwater bioretention facilities are proposed for management of stormwater drainage. The on -site bioretention facilities will improve water quality and manage flow control of the on -site pollution generating drainage prior to discharge to the public system. 17. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All of the above utilities are currently available at the project site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Proposed utilities include electricity, natural gas, potable water, refuse service, telephone and sanitary sewer. A connection will be made from the new High School to the existing 8" sanitary side sewer. Provision will be made by local municipal and franchise providers. Construction activities will include trenching and backfilling as required for upgrading of existing services. Storm drainage detention facilities will be constructed on site to manage on -site storm water. 11 TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT C. SIGNATURE EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 12 TO BE COMPLETED BYAPPLICANT C. SIGNATURE EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature:' i Date Submitted: VI 12 FWPS Support Services Center Maintenance & Operations Transportation 1211 S 332id St. Federal Way, WA 98003 To Whom it may concern, +0 Federal Way Public Schools N • Federal Way Public School's currently follows the WSDA Compliance Guide for the Use of Pesticides at Public Schools(K-12) and Licensed Day -Care Centers. Eden Advance Pest Technologies deals with rodent and bug infestations. Vegetation pest control is done in-house by pesticide licensed groundskeepers. Jason Nelson Project Manager janelson C fwps.org 253-945-5935 December 12, 2014 RESV gMl7,E D DEC 162014 Cam' OF FEDERAL COS WAY Maintenance & Operations - Phone: 253945.5930 Fax 253.945.5959 Transportation - Phone: 253.945.5960 Fax 253.945.5999 www.livos org Compliance Guide For the Use of Pesticides At Public Schools (K-12) And Licensed Day -Care Centers March 2010 RESUBMITTED DEC 16 2014 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS COMPLIANCE GUIDE FOR THE USE OF PESTICIDES AT PUBLIC SCHOOLS (K-12) AND LICENSED DAY-CARE CENTERS Table of Contents Page(s) Purposeof This Manual....................................................................................................1 Summaryof the Requirements....................................................................................2-3 Lrtroduction.................................................................................................................... 4-5 General Questions and Answers.............................................................................e..... 6-8 ImportantDefinitions................................................................................................. 9-10 Notiflcation.......................................................................................11-15 Pre -notification (forty-eight hours)............................................16-18 PostingRequirements....................................................................................................I..... Schoolgrounds...........................................................................................19-21 Exampleof school grounds poster.................................................................22 Schoolfacilities.......................................................................................... 23-25 Exampleof school facilities posters...............................................................26 Recordkeeping Requirements ................................... ................................ 2'7 Annualsummary......................................................................28 LicensingRequirements..................................................................................................29 Page(s) DisposalRequirements....................................................................................................30 StorageRequirements...............................................................................................3I-32 Sections of Lary Related to the Use of Pesticides at Public Schools and LicensedDay-care Centers.................................................................................. 33-40 Commercial Applicator Posting Law.............................................................................41 WSDA Pesticide Storage Rules................................................................................ 42-43 Examplesof Recordkeeping Forms.......................................................................... 44-46 BlankRecordkeeping Forms.................................................................................... 47-48 ContactInformation........................................................................................................49 Purpose of this Manual Compliance with the new pesticide notification and posting Iaw will provide a greater level of protection for students, employees and visitors of public schools and licensed day-care centers. WSDA will be enforcing the provisions of the law and has prepared this manual in order to assist in understanding of the law, achieving compliance and getting information out to interested persons about their responsibilities. As with any new law, there are some areas where the requirements are not specific and are open to interpretation. This manual outlines the specifics of the law and discusses those areas that may be open to interpretation in order to provide the highest level of protection for students and school employees. Also included in this manual is information on the storage and disposal of pesticides and their containers, which may be useful to you. Page 1 of 49 Summary Pesticide Use in Public Schools and Licensed Day -Care Centers What is the definition of a pesticide? (a) Any substance or mixture of substances (such as, but not limited to, herbicides, insecticides, and rodenticides) intended to prevent, destroy, control, repel, or mitigate any pest (such as, but not limited to, weeds, insects, and rodents); (b) Any substance or mixture of substances intended to be used as a plant regulator, defoliant or desiccant; and (c) Any spray adjuvant, such as a wetting- agent, spreading agent, deposit builder, adhesive, emulsifying agent, deflocculating agent, water modifier, or similar agent with or without toxic properties of its own intended to be used with any pesticide as an aid to the application or effect thereof, and sold in a package or container separate from that of the pesticide with which it is to be used. Who must comply with the notification and posting requirements for pesticide use in schools and day-care centers? All public schools (K-12) and licensed day-care centers. 'The law does not include private schools or unlicensed (home) day-care or adult day-care centers. What are the Requirements? 1. Notification (Pages 11-18) a. Notification of the pest control policies and methods. b. Pre -Notification to interested parents or guardians and employees at least forty-eight hours before an application e. Posting of the notification in a prominent place in the main office of the school d. Emergency and other exceptions 2. Posting (Notification) Signs (Pages 19-26) a. Outdoors - At the Iocation of the application and each primary point of entry to the grounds, at least 4x5 inches in size, state the landscape has been treated and list a contact telephone number. b. Exterior and Interior of buildings - At the location of the application, at least 8.5 x 11 inches in size, include the product name, date, time and location of the application, the pest and a contact name and telephone number. c. Posting of the notification in a prominent place in the main office of the school d. Exceptions Page 2 of 49 3. Licensing (Page 29) School employees do not need to be licensed to apply pesticides unless they are using state or federally restricted use pesticides or using motorized, mechanical or pressurized power• equipment (does not include pressurized backpacks or hand- held spray cans). 4. Records (Pages 27-28) a. Annual summary available to interested persons b. Department of Agriculture requirements Page 3 of 49 INTRODUCTION The current law requires public (K-12) schools and licensed day-care centers to provide notification of their pest control policies and methods upon request of parents or guardians and school employees; establish a system to notify parents or guardians and employees of planned pesticide use; and post signs where pesticides have been applied. Reasons behind the new law Much attention has been focused in recent years on the impact of pesticides on children's health. Because of this concern, federal laws related to pesticide registration have been changed, funding was made available for new research evaluating children's environmental health risks and numerous national, state and local efforts to minimize children's exposure to pesticides were initiated. The Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) supports efforts that increase the safe use of pesticides around children and cooperated fully in the development of the new legislation. Fortunately, there have been few reported instances of exposure or improper use of pesticides in our schools but the law should reduce exposure potential even further. Major Provisions of the Law The law requires public schools and licensed day -cares to notify parents or guardians and school employees of pesticide use on school grounds and in school facilities. Notification consists of three primary components: notification upon request by parents or guardians and school employees; notification prior to application (pre -notification); and posting all pesticide applications. Pesticide application records and an annual summary must be made available. Notification All public schools and licensed day-care centers must provide a written notification upon request to parents or guardians and of school employees. This notification must inform them of the school's pest control policies and methods and the requirements for posting and pre -notification. Pre -notification A system must be in place that, at a minimum, notifies interested parents or guardians and school employees at least forty-eight hours before a pesticide application. Notification must state the location, intended date and time of the application, the pest to be controlled and the name and telephone number of a contact person at the school or day-care center. Page 4 of 49 Posting The law requires posting of all pesticide applications at the time of the application. The poster (sign) must remain in place a minimum of twenty-four hours. Schools are not liable for posters that are removed by unauthorized individuals. Posting requirements are different for pesticide applications made to school grounds (outdoors) versus applications to school structures (exterior and interior). Pesticide applications made to school grounds must be posted at the location of the application and at each primary point of entry to the school grounds. The signs must be at least 4 inches by 5 inches in size and must state "THIS LANDSCAPE 14AS BEEN RECENTLY SPRAYED OR TREATED WITH PESTICIDES BY YOUR SCHOOL", and must also include a statement on who to call for more information. Pesticide applications made to school structures (exterior and interior) and other school facilities (see definition on page 9-10) must be posted at the location of the application. The signs must be at least 8.5 x I I inches in size. The signs must state the name of the pesticide applied the date, time and location of the application, the pest to be controlled and a contact name and telephone number. Posting of the notification in a prominent place in the main office of the school is also required. Records In addition to WSDA's existing recordkeeping requirements for certified applicators, public schools and day-care centers must keep an annual summary of all recorded applications. The schools must make the annual summary readily available to interested persons. Page 5 of 49 General Questions and Answers When did the law go into effect? July 1, 2002 with minor amendments effective July 26, 2009 Does this Iaw require that a school practice integrated pest management (IPM.)? No. The law is not an IPM law. WSDA encourages schools to learn about the importance of IPM and utilize these principles to appropriately manage pest problems. Do school employees need to be licensed to apply pesticides at my school? No. See the section on licensing to determine the need for a license. WSDA encourages school employees who are applying any type of pesticide with any type of apparatus to become licensed. Do schools have to hire licensed pest control operators for pesticide applications at a school? The law does not require this. See the licensing section for specific WSDA requirements. If a school does contract with a commercial company to apply any type of pesticide, the company and the individual must be licensed. Do school employees need a license to apply a wasp spray to treat a yellow,jacket nest in the ball fields? A school employee would not need a license unless a restricted use pesticide is used or they were applying a pesticide using a power apparatus. Call school employees pour in a mixture of ammonia and vinegar to control an ant nest instead of using a registered pesticide? The WSDA encourages the use of only pesticides that are registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and that are used only on the specific sites listed on the label. Schools may face significant liability issues for injuries or property damage caused by home remedy pesticides. Do school employees need a license to use disinfectants? No. Disinfectants are classified as antimicrobials. This law does not apply to the use of antimicrobial pesticides. What exactly are antimicrobial pesticides? "Antimicrobial pesticides" are pesticides that are used for the control of microbial pests, including but not limited to viruses, bacteria, algae, and protozoa, and are intended for use as a disinfectant or sanitizer. They would include products to clean surfaces, food preparation areas, bathrooms, locker rooms, and swimming pools. Is bleach always an antimicrobial pesticide? Bleach is sodium hypochlorite. Usually "bleach" when used to clean surfaces or equipment or when used as a swimming pool disinfectant is an antimicrobial. Other products containing sodium hypochlorite (bleach) used for other control purposes (ex. Page 6 of 49 moss control) are pesticides. Any material used to control any pest (weeds, insects, rodents, moss, etc.) must be registered with the EPA. What do you mean by product name of the pesticide to be applied? This is the name on the package. It is what you would ask for if you wanted to purchase a specific brand eg. "Jack's Hornet Spray". This is different than the active ingredient, which is the name of the chemical in the package. You must use the complete product name on structure posting signs and application record forms. Is a school bus considered a school facility? Yes. Any property owned or leased by the school is considered a school facility. What does "not occupied by students for two consecutive days" really mean in regards to school facility and school ground applications? It means that no students or employees of the school which was treated will be at a school sponsored event or working for a period of forty-eight consecutive hours. If an application is made to the interior of the school and the school evert is a football game, and no entry to the interior of the school can occur, the indoor application would not require pre -notification. What can happen if a school is not in compliance with the laws and rules related to the use of pesticides? A licensed applicator or the person most responsible for the posting, use and notification of pesticide may be subjected to a civil penalty up to $7500.00 per violation. Does this law apply to pesticide applications made in school greenhouses and agricultural or horticultural areas? Yes. All pesticide applications made to school property must comply with all posting and notification requirements and other regulations specific to pesticides. Does this law apply to pesticide applications made by school volunteers? Yes. The school is responsible and must insure that all applications made by volunteers comply with the posting and notification requirements. The volunteer has to keep records of landscape applications and may need to be licensed as a Public Operator under certain conditions (seep. 31). Are pre -notification and posting needed for gel baits, crack and crevice treatments and wall void treatments? The law exempts the pre -notification requirements when the placements of insect or rodent baits are not accessible to children. It can not be assumed however that all gel baits and crack and crevice treatments would always be non -accessible to children. Examples of a non -accessible application would include the placement of gels or crack and crevices treatments behind the stove, or refrigerator or other similar areas. Wall voids are not accessible to children and therefore would not require a pre -notification. If you have a question concerning the accessibility by children; the WSDA should be contacted prior to the application. Page 7 of 49 IMPORTANT DEFINITIONS The following definitions are all found in RCW 17.21. "Antimicrobial pesticide" means a pesticide that is used for the control of microbial pests, including but not limited to viruses, bacteria, algae, and protozoa, and is intended for use as a disinfectant or sanitizer. • "Apparatus" means any type of ground, water, or aerial equipment, device, or contrivance using motorized, mechanical, or pressurized power and used to apply any pesticide on land and anything that may be growing, habitating, or stored on or in such land, but shall not include any pressurized handsized household device used to apply any pesticide, or any equipment, device, or contrivance of which the person who is applying the pesticide is the source of power or energy in making such pesticide application, or any other small equipment, device, or contrivance that is transported in a piece of equipment licensed under this chapter as an apparatus. • "Certified applicator" means any individual who is licensed as a commercial pesticide applicator, commercial pesticide operator, public operator, private - commercial applicator, demonstration and research applicator, or certified private applicator, or any other individual who is certified by the director to use or supervise the use of any pesticide which is classified by the EPA or the director as a restricted use pesticide. + "Landscape application" means an application of any EPA registered pesticide to any exterior landscape area around residential property, commercial properties such as apartments or shopping centers, parks, golf courses, schools including nursery schools and licensed day -cares, or cemeteries or similar areas. This definition shall not apply to: (a) Applications made by certified private applicators; (b) mosquito abatement, gypsy moth eradication, or similar wide -area pest control programs sponsored by governmental entities; and (c) commercial pesticide applicators making structural applications. ■ "Pesticide" means, but is not limited to: (a) Any substance or mixture of substances intended to prevent, destroy, control, repel, or'mitigate any pest; (b) Any substance or mixture of substances intended to be used as a plant regulator, defoliant or desiccant; and (c) Any spray adjuvant, such as a wetting agent, spreading agent, deposit builder, adhesive, emulsifying agent, deflocculating agent, water modifier, or similar agent with or without toxic properties of its own intended to be used with any pesticide as an aid to the application or effect thereof; and sold in a package or container separate from that of the pesticide with which it is to be used. • "School" as used in this section means a licensed day-care center or a public kindergarten or a public elementary or secondary school. Page 9 of 49 • "School facility" means any facility used for licensed day-care center purposes or for the purposes of a public kindergarten or public elementary or secondary school. School facility includes the buildings or structures, playgrounds, landscape areas, athletic fields, school vehicles, or any other area of school property. Page 10 of 49 Notification Requirements Regarding Pest Control Policies and Methods, Including Posting and Notification Requirements What does the law require? Changes were made to the annual notification requirements during the 2009 legislative session. RCW 17.21.415 (2) now states "A school shall provide written notification to parents or guardians of students and to employees upon request describing the school's pest control policies and methods, including the posting and notification requirements of this section". In addition RCW 28A.320.165 states "Schools as defined in RCW 17,21.415 shall provide notice of pesticide use to parents or guardians of students and employees pursuant to chapter 17.21 RCW, upon the request of the parent or guardian. What schools are required to make notifications? This law defines "school" as a licensed day-care center, a public kindergarten, or a public elementary or secondary school. The posting and notification sections do not apply to private schools, unlicensed home day-care centers, colleges or universities. What is meant by notification for parents and guardians? As indicated above, notification is required (RCW 17,21.415 (2)) upon request of parents or guardians of students and school employees (changed in 2009 legislation). In order for this law to work as intended WSDA is encouraging schools to provide information at the beginning of the school year indicating that parents and guardians of students will be notified if requested, concerning the school's pest control policies and methods, including the posting and notification requirements of this section. When parents or guardians or school employees request to be notified, schools must provide the required information in writing. Schools would be allowed to provide the information via e-mail, fax, carried home by student or regular mail contingent on the method requested by the parent or guardian. What is notification -for school employees? RCW 17.21.415 (2) was amended in the 2009 legislature. if a school employee requests to be notified, the school is required to provide notification. Employees, who begin work after the school year begins, should be notified on their first day at work. How should parents or guardians and employees be notified? The law states they must be informed in writing. In order for this law to work as intended WSDA is encouraging school to provide information at the beginning of the school year indicating that parents and guardians of students will be notified if' requested of the school's pest control policies and methods, including the posting and notification requirements if requested. When parents or guardians request to be notified, schools must provide the required information in writing. Schools would be allowed to provide the information via e-mail, fax, carried home by student or regular mail contingent on the method requested by the parent or guardian. The notification provided must be complete Page 4 9 of 49 and not.just refer parents and employees to a website or the other location for complete information. Schools are encouraged to discuss annual notification at orientations, on websites, and at Parent 'Teachers Association (PTA) and other outreach activities to provide parents information on how the school will notify parents on an annual basis. However, written notification is still required. Placing the annual notification only in a city newspaper or only on the school district's web site does not meet the requirement for written notification. What are the information regnirements for notifications? Pest control policies and methods The law requires that notification shall include information describing the school's pest control policies and methods, including the posting and notification requirements. At present there is no uniform policy that is utilized by all schools related to pest control procedures. Some schools may not even have any policies about pest control. WSDA is encouraging any schools that do not have a policy to develop one. Due to the lack of a uniform policy, the content will likely vary greatly among schools due to the size of the school, location of school, funding, etc. At a minimum, WSDA recommends that schools provide the following information related to pest control policies and methods: • Acknowledgement of whether an individual school/district has a policy or not • What pesticides (common name i.e. RoundupTM) may be applied on a regular basis (more than twice a year) • Where pesticides may be applied (e.g. on playfields, in class rooms, cafeteria, greenhouses, etc.) ■ If pesticides are applied at schools by commercial applicators or by school employees or a combination of both • Specific details about a school's/district's system for advanced (forty-eight hours) notification of pesticide use. Details must include method of notification, (using registry method to include how to sign up for the registry or blanket notification or other notification system discussed on page I6). • Where and how parents may obtain information about pesticide use records as well as the annual summary of pesticide use • If a school does not use or contract for the use of pesticides, the notification should state this. In addition, WSDA recommends that the notification include information on when the annual summary will be available, and who to contact if an individual requests a summary. What are the Posting and notification information requirements when parents have requested notification The law requires that the notification must include information on the posting requirements. In order to meet the requirements of this section of law, WSDA is suggesting that the following portions of the law be provided as part of the notification. Page 12 of 49 Note: A school may choose to provide the posting and notification information in a different format than listed below, but are advised not to change the wording as the meaning of the law may be affected. Page 13 of 49 RCW 17.21.415 requires a school to: 1. Establish a notification system that, as a minimum, notifies interested parents or guardians of students and employees at least forty-eight hours before a pesticide application to a school facility 2. The notification system shall include posting of the notification in a prominent place in the main office of the school. 3. All notifications to parents, guardians, and employees shall include the heading "Notice: Pesticide Application" and, at a minimum, shall state:. (a) The product narne of the pesticide to be applied; (b) The intended date and time of application; (c) The location to which the pesticide is to be applied; (d) The pest to be controlled; and (e) The name and phone number of a contact person at the school. 4. A school facility application must be made within forty-eight hours following the intended date and time stated in the notification or the notification process shall be repeated. 5. A school shall, at the time of application, post notification signs for all pesticide applications made to school facilities unless the application is otherwise required to be posted by a certified applicator under the provisions of RCW 17.21.410(l )(d). (a) Notification signs for applications made to school grounds by school employees shall be placed at the location of the application and at each primary point of entry to the school grounds. The signs shall be a minimum of four inches by five inches and shall include the words: "THIS LANDSCAPE HAS BEEN RECENTLY SPRAYED OR TREATED WITH PESTICIDES BY YOUR SCHOOL" as the headline and "FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL" (all capital letters) as the footer. The footer shall provide the name and telephone number of a contact person at the school. Note; WSDA suggests that each school determine the primary points of entry to school grounds and make that information known to parents, guardians and employees as part of the annual notification. When possible, the school should include a map of the school property with the primary points of entry identified. A more detailed discussion about the primary points of entry can be found on page 19. (b) Notification signs for applications made to school facilities other than school grounds shall be posted at the location of the application. The signs shall be a minimum of 8.5 x I 1 inches in size and shall include the heading "Notice: Pesticide Application" and, at a minimum, shall state: (i) The product name of the pesticide applied; (ii) The date and time of application; (iii) The location to which the pesticide was applied; (iv) The pest to be controlled; and (v) The name and phone number of a contact person at the school. Page 14 of 49 (e) Notification signs shall be printed in colors contrasting to the background (d) Notification signs shall remain in place for at least twenty-four hours from the time the application is completed. In the event the pesticide label requires a restricted entry interval greater than twenty-four hours, the notification sign shall remain in place consistent with the restricted entry interval time as required by the label. Schools are not liable for posters that are removed by unauthorized persons. 6. A school facility application does not include the application of antimicrobial pesticides or the placement of insect or rodent baits that are not accessible to children. 7. The pre -notification requirements of this section do not apply if the school facility application is made when the school is not occupied by students for at least two consecutive days after the application. 8. The pre -notification requirements of this section do not apply to any emergency school facility application for control of any pest that poses an immediate Truman health or safety threat, such as an application to control stinging insects. When an emergency school facility application is made, notification consistent with the school's notification system shall occur as soon as possible after the application. The notification shall include information consistent with the normal pre -notification requirements. . 9. A school shall make the records of all pesticide applications to school facilities required under this chapter, including an annual summary of the records, readily accessible to interested persons. 10. A school is not liable for the removal of signs by unauthorized persons. A school that complies with this section may not be held liable for personal property damage or bodily injury resulting from signs that are placed as required Schools may also add additional information to the posting signs if they choose to. RCW 28A.320.165 requires a school to: Provide notice of pesticide use to parents or guardians of students and employees pursuant to chapter 17.21 RCW, upon the request of the parent or guardian. Page 15 of 49 Pre -Application Notification (Forty -Eight Hours in Advance) What does the law require? RCW 17.21.41 S (3) states, "A school shall establish a notification system that, as a minimum, notifies interested parents or guardians of students and employees at least forty-eight hours before a pesticide application to a school facility. The notification system shall include posting of the notification in a prominent place in the main office of the school." What is meant by "as a minimum" notifies interested parents or guardians of students and employees? The law was written and intended to provide schools some degree of flexibility in establishing a pre -notification system. Schools must notify interested parents or guardians of students as well as school employees at least forty-eight hours before an application at a school facility. Schools may provide additional, earlier or more frequent information if they choose. Schools may choose either a blanket notification or a registry system. What are some examples schools may use to pre -notify parents, guardians and employees (at least forty-eight hours in advance) of a pesticide application? Example one. Some schools may choose to establish a registry system. A registry system would notify only those parents or employees who have indicated interest to the school that they want to be notified. if this is the chosen notification system, schools must detail in their annual notification exactly how the system works and how.parents, guardians and employees will be contacted (i.e. phone, fax, e-mail). The school should request as part of their annual notification that parents, guardians and employees provide a written response if they are interested in being pre -notified for all pesticide applications. The school should make sure those who have an expressed an interest provide the school with their name and contact information (home phone, fax, e-mail). Schools are encouraged to keep a record of dates of contact and how contact was made. The written request then becomes a registry of contacts. The school will be required to contact these individuals at Ieast forty-eight hours in advance of a pesticide application (see page 17 for exceptions). Example two. A school may choose to notify everyone (a blanket notification system). If this is the chosen notification system, schools must state this in their annual notification and should explain how the notification will be delivered (e.g. sent home with students, mailed, etc.). Schools are encouraged to keep a record of dates of contact and how contact was made. There may be other systems the school could adopt which would meet the requirements of the law. Remember, the minimum requirement is that schools must notify interested parents or guardians of students at least forty-eight hours in advance of a pesticide application (and must detail how they will accomplish this in their annual notice) and they must post a notification in a prominent place in the main office. Page 16 of 49 What information must the pre -notification include? RCW. 17.21.415 (4) states, "all notifications to parents, guardians, and employees shall include the heading: "Notice: Pesticide Application" and at a minimum, shall state: a) The product name of the pesticide to be applied; b) The intended date and time of the application; c) The location to which the pesticide is to be applied; d) The pest to be controlled; e) The name and phone number of a contact person at the school. What are the exceptions to the pre -notification requirements? The law allows for several situations in which pre -notification is not required at all and one situation in which a notification is required but does not need to be made in advance of the pesticide application. Antimicrobial Exception RCW 17.21.415 (7) states, "A school facility application does not include the application of antimicrobial pesticides or the placement of insect or rodent baits that are not accessible to children." These types of pesticides are exempted from the pre- notification requirements. Non -Occupied Exception The second exception is found in RCW 17.21.415 (8) and states "the pre -notification requirements of this section do not apply if the school facility application is made when the school is not occupied by students for at least two consecutive days after the application." Emergency Exception The exception that requires notification but does not require pre -notification is found in RCW 17.21.415 (9), which states, "The pre -notification requirements of this section do not apply to any emergency school facility application for control of any pest that poses an immediate human health or safety threat, such as an application to control stinging insects. When an emergency school facility application is made, notification consistent with the school's notification system shall occur as soon as possible after the application." The notification shall include information consistent with the normal pre -notification requirements. Non -stinging ants (including swarming ants), lice, and poisonous plants do not pose an immediate human health or safety threat that justifies an emergency pesticide application. A pesticide applied to control adult mosquitoes could be an emergency if the application was made the same day the adult mosquitoes are discovered. Do schools have to post forty-eight hours in advance even though interested individuals have been notified? Yes. The school is required to post at least forty-eight hours in advance in a prominent location at the school office. The poster must include at least the following information: + Notice: Pesticide Application" Page 17 of 49 • The product name of the pesticide to be applied; • The intended date and time of the application; • The location to which the pesticide is to be applied; • The pest to be controlled; • The name and phone number of a contact person at the school. Also see the school facility posting section of this document for additional information. Can pesticide products be included on the notification even if they may not be applied? No. The pre -notification trust be specific and can only include pesticides that will be applied. Who is responsible for pre -notification when someone other than a school employee snakes a pesticide application? The school is responsible even though they did not make the application. The school must coordinate with the individual or company making the application to allow the necessary amount of time to provide pre -notification prior to the application being made. What if the application cannot be made consistent with the time identified in the pre -notification process? RCW 17.21.415, "states that the application trust be made within forty-eight hours following the intended date and time stated in the notification or the notification process shall be repeated." Who is responsible for notification if the school leases property to which the renter/leasee applies pesticides? Only the school is responsible for notifying parents and employees before pesticide applications. This means the school must coordinate with the renter/leasee so that notification can be provided. A rental agreement could include a provision that the owner must notify the renter/leasee before pesticide applications. Page 18 of 49 NOTIFICATION SIGNS (POSTING) REQUIREMENTS SCHOOL GROUNDS What is considered to be a school ground pesticide application? Any pesticide application to exterior landscape plants or ant's nest located around the school property is considered to be a school ground application. Examples include flowerbeds, running tracks, athletic fields, and playgrounds. Are school employees required to post all pesticide applications made to school grounds? Yes. RCW 17.21.415 (6) states, "A school -shall, at the time of application, post notification signs for all pesticide applications made to school facilities unless the application is otherwise required to be posted by a certified applicator under the provisions of RCW 17.21.410(1)(d)." When are the posting signs required to be placed? The law states "at the time of application." WSDA is suggesting that posting occur just prior to the application. What are the posting requirements for pesticide applications to school grounds made by school employees? RCW 17.21.415 (6), (a) states, - "Notification signs for applications made to school grounds by school employees shall: • be placed at the location of the application and at each primary point of entry to the school grounds ■ be a minimum of four inches by five inches • include the words: "THIS LANDSCAPE HAS BEEN RECENTLY SPRAYED OR TREATED WITH PESTICIDES BY YOUR SCHOOL" as the headline and "FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL" (all capital letters) as the looter • include the name and telephone number of a contact person at the school • be printed in colors contrasting to the background as required by RCW 17.21.415 (6) (c) (see example on page 26)." Who should the school list as a contact person to call for more information? WSDA recommends that a person who is knowledgeable about when, where and how the pesticide was applied be listed as the contact person. WSDA is suggesting this be the individual who actually made the application or a pest management coordinator at the school, unless applied by a commercial applicator contracted by the school. The contact person should be listed by name and not job title. Can a larger sign be used to post a pesticide application to school grounds? Yes. The law establishes the minimum requirements. Schools may choose to use larger signs or include additional information beyond the minimum requirements. Page 19 of 49 What is meant by placed (posted) at the location of the application? The ease or difficulty of posting will vary with the type of application site. It will be easy to post flowerbeds and other small areas while it will be more challenging to post an entire playground or ail entire athletic field. While one posting sign on an athletic field or playground will meet the requirements of the law, WSDA recommends that several signs be used when large areas are treated. What is meant by placed (posted) at each primary point of entry? The intent of this requirement is to provide advance notice that an application has been made to school grounds well before anyone may enter the treated area. Since the actual treated area is also required to be posted, WSDA believes primary points of entry should be those places where people generally enter via normal vehicular and/or foot traffic. Most schools have very specific traffic routes as well as foot routes already in place in order to protect students. Therefore those areas identified for vehicular or foot traffic is a primary point of entrance and should be posted. How long are postings to remain in place? RCW 17.21.415 (6), (d) states, "Notification signs shall remain in place for at least twenty-four hours from the time the application is completed. In the event the pesticide label requires a restricted entry interval greater than twenty-four hours, the notification sign shall remain in place consistent with the restricted entry interval time as required by the label." Who is responsible for the removal of posting signs? The school is responsible for the removal of signs, which should take place after twenty- four hours or longer if required by the label. It is important to remove signs in order to prevent sending a false message that additional applications have been made. Are posting signs still required if students do not occupy the school for at least two consecutive days after the application? Yes, posting is required. Remember that pre -notification is not required in this situation. Are there any situations in which posting is not required? Yes. RCW 17.21.415 (7) states, "A school facility application does not include the application of antimicrobial pesticides or the placement of insect or rodent baits that are not accessible to children. Since these situations are exempted applications, they do not require posting or prenotification." Are schools liable if markers are removed by someone else or for injury caused by the signs? No. RCW 17.21.415 (11) states, "A school is not liable for the removal of signs by unauthorized persons. A school that complies with this section may not be held liable for personal property damage or bodily injury resulting from signs that are placed as required." Page 20 of 49 Who is responsible for posting if someone other than a school employee makes a pesticide application (landscape application)? The company (individual) who is making the application is required to post in accordance with RCW 17.21,410. Note that these posting requirements are slightly diferent than the requirements for school employees but meet the requirements of this law. Who is responsible for posting if someone other than a school employee make a pesticide application (other than landscape)? This is the responsibility of the school. If a school contracts work to a commercial company it is still the school's responsibility to make sure that posting occurs in compliance with RCW 17.21.415. What is the minimum size of the marker and at what height should the marker be placed? The marker must be at least 4 by 5. There is no specific law governing the height at which the marker should be placed, but WSDA recommends the marker be placed at least 12 inches from the ground. Are there any specific color requirements for the marker? No. The marker should be printed in colors contrasting to the background. Can the markers be larger than 4 by 5 inches? Yes, Can a school include additional information on the marker? Yes. However, the exact wording in capital letters, detailed in the above example must always be a part of the marker. Do the letters have to be of a specific size? No. WSDA recommends that the letters be as large as possible that still fit on a 4 by 5- inch marker. Do the words poster, notification signs and markers all mean the same thing? Yes, the words mean the same thing. Can I use this sign to post indoor applications? No. This sign is to be used only for outdoor (school ground) situations. Do I use this same marker to post the primary points of entry as required by law? Yes. Page 21 of 49 Example of a school grounds poster THIS LANDSCAPE HAS BEEN RECENTLY SPRAYED OR TREATED WITH PESTICIDES BY YOUR SCHOOL FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL (NAME) (NUMBER) Page 22 of 49 SCHOOL FACILITIES What is considered to be a school facility application? Any pesticide application to the interior of a building or structure or directly to the outside of a building or structure is considered to be a school facility application. Examples include: cockroach control when using a spray, flea control, fly control, and white fly control in the greenhouse. Examples of applications directly to the structure may include termite and carpenter ant control when treating the sub -structure or drilling into wall voids for ant control. School busses are considered to be school facilities. Are school employees required to post all pesticide applications made to school facilities? Yes, unless there is an agreement that the company contracted to make the application will do the posting. RCW 17.21.415 (6) states, "A school shall, at the time of application, post notification signs for all pesticide applications made to school facilities unless the application is otherwise required to be posted by a certified applicator under the provisions of RCW 17.21.410(1)(d)." When are the posting signs required to be placed? The law states "at the time of application." 'AfSDA recommends that posting occur just prior to or immediately after the application. What are the posting requirements for pesticide applications to school facilities when made by a school employee? RCW 17.21.415 (6), (b) states." Notification signs for applications made to school facilities other than school grounds shall be posted at the location of the application." The signs shall: + be a minimum of eight and one-half by eleven inches • include the heading "Notice: Pesticide Application" and, at a minimum, shall state: (i) The product name of the pesticide applied; (ii) The date and time of application; (iii) The location to which the pesticide was applied; (iv) The pest to be controlled; and (v) The name and phone number of a contact person at the school • be printed in colors contrasting to the background as required by RCW 17.21. 415 (6), (c). (see example on page 27) In addition to the sign required by RCW 17.21.415 (6), applications of agricultural -use pesticides in school greenhouses require posting of a sign specific to Worker Protection Standards (WAC 16-233-125). Who should be the contact person at a school? WSDA recommends that a person who is knowledgeable about when, where and how the pesticide was applied be listed as the contact person. WSDA is suggesting this be the individual who actually'made the application or a pest management coordinator at the school, unless applied by a commercial applicator contracted by the school. Page 23 of 49 What is meant by placed (posted) at the site of application? The location is the specific area (site) to which the pesticide was applied. Examples would include the kitchen, a specific classroom, gymnasium, school bus, or outside of the structure if wall voids were drilled. The posting requirement also includes the location to where the pesticide was applied. For example, the poster would be placed in the kitchen and the location information on the poster could be "crack and crevices" or "under sink" or "in pantry". In this example the poster is not placed by the crack or crevices or under the sink. How long are posting signs required to remain in place? At least twenty-four hours. RC W 17.21.415 (6), (d) states, "Notification signs shall remain in place for at least twenty-four hours from the time the application is completed. In the event the pesticide label requires a restricted entry interval greater than twenty-four hours, the notification sign shall remain in place consistent with the restricted entry interval time as required by the label." Who is responsible for the removal of posting signs? The school is responsible for the removal of signs, which should take place after twenty- four hours or longer if required by the label. It is important to remove signs in order to prevent sending a false message that additional applications have been made. Are posting signs still required if students do not occupy the school facility for at least two consecutive days after the application? Yes, posting is always required for pesticide applications other than antimicrobials or baits (see below). However, pre -notification is not required in this situation. Are there any situations in which posting is not required? Yes. Posting is not required for antimicrobials or some rodent or insect baits. RCW 17.21.415 (7) states, "A school facility application does not include the application of antimicrobial pesticides or the placement of insect or rodent baits that are not accessible to children. Since these situations are not considered to be school facility applications they do not require posting or pre -notification". Who is responsible for posting if someone other than a school employee makes a pesticide application? The school is responsible even though they did not make the application. The school may enter into an agreement with an individual (company) who is making the application requiring them to post signs. However, if a school selects this option, it is still their responsibility to ensure that posting has occurred. Page 24 of 49 What is meant by the product name? The product name is always found on the front of the pesticide container and is usually the largest size text. Note the example on the next page is "Raid Ant and Roach Killer." There are many pesticides that are called "ant and roach killer." if you posted the phase "ant and roach killer" the product name would not be complete. Therefore make sure you include the entire product name. Do not just put "insect killer", "wasp spray", or "flea control", always include the complete product name. The product name is also required to be on your pesticide application records as well as on your annual summary. What is the minimum size of the marker and at what height should the marker be placed? The minimum size of the poster is 8.5 by I i inches. The law does not define the exact height, but WSDA recommends the marker be placed approximately five feet high, close to eye level and therefore readily visible to most individuals. Are there any specific color requirements for the marker? No. Except that they should be printed in colors contrasting to the background. Can the markers be larger than 8.5 by 11? Yes. Can a school include additional information on the marker? Yes Do the letters have to be of a specific size? No. However, WSDA believes the intent of the legislation was to make the marker readily visible. Therefore WSDA recommends that the print fonts be no smaller than 26 point (one-fourth inch). Can I use this sign to post grounds applications? No. The requirements are different for grounds posting. Is there anywhere else this marker must be displayed? No. However the law does require that similar information is posted forty-eight hours in advance in a prominent location in the main office of the school. (see notification requirements in this manual) Page 25 of 49 EXAMPLE OF SCHOOL FACILITIES POSTER Notice: Pesticide Application Product name - Raid Ant and Roach Killer Date and time of application; April 1, 2002 at 6 P.M. Location to which the pesticide was applied: Under the sink in kitchen Pest to be controlled: Cockroaches Name and phone number of a contact person at the school. John Doe (360)- 999-9999 Page 26 of 49 RECORDKEEPING Importance of Records The need to keep accurate, up to date records is much more than just a requirement of the law. The value of keeping detailed records may not be obvious at first glance. Application of pesticides in situations where people may enter is one of the illost challenging types of applications. These types of applications must always be done with the utmost care to prevent human exposure. It is extremely important to have accurate and reliable application records in the event that someone does become ill or if allegations of illness occur, and are critically important for districts to monitor their pesticide use and to better track their landscape and building maintenance programs related to the use of pesticides. If you can illustrate precisely when you made your application, what products were used, rate, date, and time of the application you will add credibility to your application and give people the information they need to accurately resolve potential problems. For these reasons, pesticide applicators should take recordkeeping very seriously. To encourage your recordkeeping efforts, this manual describes the recordkeeping requirements, and provides blank and completed examples of the two applicable WSDA recordkeeping forms. Recordkeeping requirements and examples RCW 17.21.I00 and WAC 16-228-1320 set forth the WSDA's recordkeeping requirements. In this manual you will find a list of the requirements and what the requirements mean. In addition, you will find examples of appropriately filled in records, as well as some blank recordkeeping forms. The law does not require that you use a WSDA form to keep track of your records. However, if WSDA requests your records for any reason, the records must be made available on one of the WSDA approved forms. The law does make a provision for the use of other forms as long as they have been approved by the WSDA. There are numerous recordkeeping software programs, which have been approved by the department. Because the new law mandates an annual summary, schools should consider the development of a database that allows the opportunity to produce the annual summary in an efficient manner. Licensed applicators must make records of all pesticide applications, including landscape applications, facility applications, emergency applications, bait applications, lice applications, and mosquito repellants. Records must be made of all landscape applications made by school employees regardless of whether or not they are licensed. Records are not required of facility applications made by an unlicensed school employee. 'File WSDA recommends snaking records of all pesticide applications, regardless of license status. Page 27 of 49 Annual Summary RCW 17.21.415 (10) requires that a school shall make the records of all pesticide applications to school facilities, including an annual summary of the records, readily accessible to interested persons. What information is required to be a part of the annual summary? The Iaw does not define any specific requirements for the summary or the date for annual notification. WSDA believes the intent of the legislation was to include, at a minimum, the following information: 1. Product names of all pesticides used during the previous year that are listed in the records including pesticides applied by commercial companies or public entities making public health control applications 2. Active ingredients of all pesticides used during the previous school year that are included in the records 3. Quantities of each pesticide applied by active ingredient and by amount of tank mix applied, and 4. Name(s) of the school(s) where pesticides were applied. Please note the above elements concerning pesticide applications are already required under RCW 17.21.100. A school may choose to include additional elements but are urged to always provide no less than the four elements listed above. When should the annual summary be made available? The law also does not define the specific date other than on an annual basis. WSDA recommends that September is an ideal time for the annual summary to be made available. This coincides with the beginning of the school year and the annual notification process. How does a school make the annual summary available? WSDA recommends that the districts make the summaries readily accessible to all interested parties by at least keeping a copy in the main office of each school. A school may also consider posting the information on a district web site. Does a school have to mail a copy of the annual summary to everyone? No. The school only has to make the summary readily available to persons who have expressed an interest. How should a school inform individuals about the annual pesticide summary, how to get a copy of the summary and when the summary will be available? WSDA is encouraging schools to include this information as part of their annual notification. Page 28 of 49 LICENSING REQUIREMENTS Do all applications of pesticides to school property require school employees to be licensed? No. School employees must be licensed if using restricted use pesticides or when pesticides are applied with motorized, mechanical or pressurized power (equipment). In these cases, a Public Operator or Private Commercial license is required. This determination is based on two sections of the law as follows: RCW 1.7.21,021 (4) which defines "Apparatus" to mean any type of ground, water, or aerial equipment, device, or contrivance using motorized, mechanical, or pressurized power and used to apply any pesticide on land and anything that may be growing, habitating, or stored on or in such land, but shall not include any pressurized hand sized household device used to apply any pesticide, or any equipment, device, or contrivance of which the person who is applying the pesticide is the source of power or energy in making such pesticide application, or any other small equipment, device, or contrivance that is transported in a piece of equipment licensed under this chapter as an apparatus. Pressurized backpacks are not considered as "apparatus". A rotary or drop spreader pulled by a lawn mower that is used to apply a pesticide such as weed and feed, is an "apparatus." RCW 17.21.220 (2) states, "It shall be unlawful for any employee of a state agency, municipal corporation, public utility, or any other government agency to use or to supervise the use of any restricted use pesticide, or any pesticide by means of an apparatus, without having obtained a public operator license from the director." What categories must licensed school employees have on their license? A school employee must be licensed in all categories in which they will be applying restricted use pesticides or applying pesticides with a power apparatus. Categories often needed by school employees include: • Turf and Ornamental Weed: The control of weeds (and nloss) in all ornamental and turf situations, which includes parking lots and limited road side right-of-ways. ■ Ornamental Insect & Disease Control: The control of insects and diseases in ornamental, turf and rights -of -way situations including but not limited to schools, lawns, gardens, and greenhouses. This includes but is not Iimited to the use of insecticides, miicides, fungicides, bactericides, molluscicides and nematocides. ® PCO General: The control of insects, spiders, birds, rodents and animal pests, including but not limited to: public buildings and grounds, animal feed lots and farmsteads, including buildings and transportation equipment. ■ PCO Structural: The control of those pests that attack structural material, including but not limited to fungus, termites, carpenter ants and wood -boring beetles. May perform specific wood destroying organism inspections. • Other categories that are sometimes needed include Aquatic Pest Control (example: algaecide for aquaculture) and Public Health Control (mosquitoes). Page 29 of 49 2009 Disposal and Recycling Empty Containers Pesticide containers should be rinsed and recycled or disposed of as soon as they are empty. A properly rinsed container (triple or power rinsed) is not considered a hazardous waste. An unrinsed pesticide container is considered to be a full container for storage and disposal purposes. Unrinsed containers may designate as hazardous wastes when disposed. Properly rinsed pesticide containers do not have any special requirements for disposal. Beware, however that some landfills and transfer stations will not accept them. For these containers, the Washington Pest Consultants Association (WaPCA) has a container recycling program (see contact info below). There is no fee for this service. Many counties have programs to handle household and small business hazardous waste including pesticides. To find out more about household and small business hazardous waste disposal in your county, contact your local solid waste program or call 1-800- cleanup (1-800-253-2687) or visit Earth 911's website: http://www.carth9l I.org/ Unused Product If you have unusable pesticide product, you may contact WSDA's waste pesticide disposal program to arrange for disposal (see contact info below). There is no fee for this service. Unopened containers of legal products may be transferred to another legal user or you may list them on the Industrial Materials Exchange (IMEX). Contact IMEX by phone (206) 296-4899, by E-mail: imex@metrokc.gov or visit their website: littp://www.metroke.gov/liazwaste/iniex/ WSDA Waste Pesticide Program Contact Information Website: http://www.wa.gov/agr/pmd/pesticides/collection.litm E-mail: wastepesticide@,agr.wa.gov Telephone: (360) 902-2056 or toll free at 1-877-301-4555, Fax (360) 902-2093 Mailing address: Waste Pesticide Program, P.O. Box 42589, Olympia, WA 98504-2589 Washington Pest Consultants Association Container Recycling Program Websitc: http://pep.wsu.edu/waste/Avapea.html Northwest Ag Plastics, Inc. is currently contracted to operate the container recycling program. Website: http://www.nwagplastics.com/ Individual Northwest Ag Plastics Contacts: Steve George: home (509) 457-3850, E-mail: steve@nwagplastics Page 30 of 49 STORAGE REQUIREMENTS WSDA rules set forth requirements for storage of unattended pesticides and their containers, unless the containers have been triple -rinsed (WAC 16-228-1220 (6) & (7)). The storage requirements vary depending on the signal word of the pesticide(s) being stored. WSDA also has rules relating to the storage of bulk pesticides. Bulk pesticides are defined as registered pesticides that are transported or held in individual containers in undivided quantities of greater than fifty-five U.S. gallons liquid measure or one hundred pounds net dry weight. Storage of greater than 500 gallons liquid or 2,000 pounds of dry "bulk" pesticides triggers the Secondary Containment rules. (To obtain a copy of these rules, visit our web site at httL) JHa s.le .wa. ovlWAC/defatiit.as )x?cite= I6-22�9 PESTICIDES WITH SIGNAL WORDS DANGER WARNING OR CAUTION Pesticides with the signal words of "Danger," "Warning" or "Caution" must be stored in secured storage out of the reach of children in an acceptable enclosure (see below). PESTICIDES WITH SIGNAL WORDS DANGER/POISON Pesticides with the signal words "Danger/Poison" must be stored in an acceptable locked and posted enclosure (see below) adequate to prevent children, unauthorized persons, livestock or other animals from gaining envy. There are more stringent storage requirements for some rodent baits. The warning signs for storage areas containing pesticides with the signal words "Danger/Poison shall show the skull and crossbones symbol and the words "Danger/Poison" (or Pesticide or Chemical) Storage Area/Keep Out" in letters large enough to be legible from thirty feet. Refer to the diagram on the next page for a discussion of where to place warning signs when posting storage areas containing Danger/Poison labeled pesticides or their unrinsed containers. ACCEPTABLE ENCLOSURES FOR ALL CATEGORIES I. Closed vehicle 2. Closed trailer 3. Building or room or fenced area with a fence at least six feet high 4. Foot locker or other container which can be Iocked 5. Unattended trucks or trailers which have solid sideracks and secured tailgate at least six feet above ground, ramp or platform level 6. Bulk storage containers fifty gallons and larger with tight screw -type bungs and/or secured or locked valves. OTHER ACCEPTABLE ENCLOSURES FOR DANGER, WARNING OR CAUTION LABELED PESTICIDES Page 31 of 49 Metal containers, twenty-eight gallons and larger, with tight screw -type bungs and/or secured and Iocked valves and sealed five -gallon containers (requiring a tool to unseal) shall be considered acceptable storage. Pesticide Storage Posting of Danger/Poison Pesticides I 11. _" ST IC'11.)1: STOR%1G1 EAA.MPLE l..oi:ttlliili is3��'tinlin!, 5ii?ilS PLAC'I 'MENT OF VVARNING SiGNS d ifanother sign WMAWlity of 'rhe type momge facility detennines placement of wanAn;g signs. The stomgc m& itself must have a sign on each exterior %vall find at each exit and CntE'ance (see. example. 1). If the storage Unit is cOntained Within a lart?cr, multipurpose structure it again must have be sigm as iiidiaiW above plus Nov nmm be a sign pit Ow nmin entrance o thi: bWlding OSee note below) and on caul exterior \Nall of the multipurpose structure Nat iti Whin 30 I m of the pesticide smomge unit (_set. examNe 2.), A n ihipurpose structure which Nuts" an niicnnlitQ pesticide. Storage area (see. example 3) must be poSied aN in example 1. *Note: I%mhg or to mAn elllrance is imi required if a sign iti visible Sou the t urance which clearly identifies the possibility that pesticides may he ;toted on the premises (Le. ABC Pest Control). Page 32 of 49 Specific sections of pesticide law related to the use of pesticides at public schools and day-care centers RCW 17.21.020 Definitions. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter. (3) "Antimicrobial pesticide" means a pesticide that is used for the control of microbial pests, including but not limited to viruses, bacteria, algae, and protozoa, and is intended for use as a disinfectant or sanitizer. ) (4) "Apparatus" means any type of ground, water, or aerial equipment, device, or contrivance using motorized, mechanical, or pressurized power and used to apply any pesticide on land and anything that may be growing, habitating, or stored on or in such Iand, but shall not include any pressurized handsized household device used to apply ally pesticide, or any equipment, device, or contrivance of which the person who is applying the pesticide is the source of power or energy in Snaking such pesticide application, or any other small equipment, device, or contrivance that is transported in a piece of equipment licensed under this chapter as an apparatus. (6) "Certified applicator" means any individual who is licensed as a commercial pesticide applicator, commercial pesticide operator, public operator, private -commercial applicator, demonstration and research applicator, or certified private applicator, or any other individual who is certified by the director to use or supervise the use of any pesticide which is classified by the EPA or the director as a restricted use pesticide. (10) "Department" means the Washington state department of agriculture. (12) "Device" means any instrument or contrivance intended to trap, destroy, control, repel, or mitigate pests, but not including equipment used for the application of pesticides when sold separately from the pesticides. (13) "Direct supervision" by certified private applicators shall mean that the designated restricted use pesticide shall be applied for purposes of producing any agricultural commodity on land owned or rented by the applicator or the applicator's employer, by a competent person acting under the instructions and control of a certified private applicator who is available if and when needed, even though such certified private applicator is not physically present at the time and place the pesticide is applied. The certified private applicator shall have direct management responsibility and familiarity of the pesticide, manner of application, pest, and laird to which the pesticide is being applied. Direct supervision by all other certified applicators means direct on-the-job supervision and shall require that the certified applicator be physically present at the application site and that the person making the application be in voice and visual contact with the certified applicator at all times during the application. Direct supervision of an aerial apparatus means the pilot of the aircraft must be appropriately certified. (14) "Director" means the director of the department or a duly authorized representative. Page 33 of 49 (17) "EPA restricted use pesticide" means any pesticide classified for restricted use by the administrator, EPA. (18) "F1FRA" means the federal insecticide, fungicide and rodenticide act as amended (6I Stat. 163, 7 U.S.C. Sec. 136 et seq.). (21) "Fungicide" means any substance or mixture of substances intended to prevent, destroy, repel, or mitigate any fungi. (22) "Herbicide" means any substance or mixture of substances intended to prevent, destroy, repel, or mitigate any weed or other higher plant. (25) "Insecticide" means any substance or mixture of substances intended to prevent, destroy, repel, or mitigate any insect. (26) "Land" means all land and water areas, including airspace and all plants, animals, structures, buildings, devices, and contrivances, appurtenant to or situated on, fixed or mobile, including any used for transportation. (27) "Landscape application" means an application of any EPA registered pesticide to any exterior landscape area around residential property, commercial properties such as apartments or shopping centers, parks, golf courses, schools including nursery Schools and licensed day-care, or cemeteries or similar areas. This definition shall not apply to: (a) Applications made by certified private applicators; (b) mosquito abatement, gypsy moth eradication, or similar wide -area pest control programs sponsored by governmental entities; and (c) commercial pesticide applicators making structural applications. (28) "Nematocide" means any substance or mixture of substances intended to prevent, destroy, repel, or mitigate nematodes. (30) "Person" means any individual, partnership. association, corporation, or organized group of persons whether or not incorporated. (31) "Pest" means, but is not limited to, any insect, rodent, nematode, snail, slug, weed, and any form of plant or animal life or virus, except virus, bacteria, or other microorganisms on or in a living person or other animal or in or on processed food or beverages or pharmaceuticals, which is normally considered to be a pest, or which the director may declare to be a pest. (32) 'Pesticide" means, but is not limited to: (a) Any substance or mixture of substances intended to prevent, destroy, control, repel, or mitigate any pest; (b) Any substance or mixture of substances intended to be used as a plant regulator, defoliant or desiccant; and (c) Any spray adjuvant, such as a wetting agent, spreading agent, deposit builder, adhesive, emulsifying agent, deflocculating agent, water modifier, or similar agent with or without toxic properties of its own intended to be used with any pesticide as an aid to the application or effect thereof, and sold in a package or container sepal -ate from that of the pesticide with which it is to be used. Page 34 of 49 (37) "Residential property" includes property less than one acre in size zoned as residential by a city, town, or county, but does not include property zoned as agricultural or agricultural homesites. (38) "Restricted use pesticide" means any pesticide or device which, when used as directed or in accordance with a widespread and commonly recognized practice, the director determines, subsequent to a hearing, requires additional restrictions for that use to prevent unreasonable adverse effects on the environment including people, lands, beneficial insects, animals, crops, and wildlife, other than pests. (39) "Rodenticide" means any substance or mixture of substances intended to prevent, destroy, repel, or mitigate rodents, or any other vertebrate animal which the director may declare by rule to be a pest. (40) "School facility" means any facility used for licensed day-care center purposes or for the purposes of a public kindergarten or public elementary or secondary school. School facility includes the buildings or structures, playgrounds; landscape areas, athletic fields, school vehicles, or any other area of school property.) (42) "Unreasonable adverse effects on the environment" means any unreasonable risk to people or the environment taking into account the economic, social, and environmental costs and benefits of the use of any pesticide, or as otherwise determined by the director. RCW 17.21.100 Recordkeeping by licensees and agricultural users. (1) Certified applicators Iicensed under the provisions of this chapter, persons required to be licensed under this chapter, all persons applying pesticides to more than one acre of agricultural land in a calendar year, including public entities engaged in roadside spraying of pesticides, and all other persons risking Iandseape applications of pesticides to types of property listed in RCW I7.21.41O(1) (b), (c), (d), and (e), shall keep records for each application which shall include the following information: (a) The location of the land where the pesticide was applied; (b) The year, month, day and beginning and ending time of the application of the pesticide each day the pesticide was applied; (c) The product name used on the registered label and the United States environmental protection agency registration number, if applicable, of the pesticide which was applied; (d) The crop or site to which the pesticide was applied; (e) The amount of pesticide applied per acre or other appropriate measure; (f) The concentration of pesticide that was applied; (g) The number of acres, or other appropriate measure, to which the pesticide was applied; (h) The licensed applicator's name, address, and telephone number and the name of the individual or individuals making the application and their license number, if applicable; Page 35 of 49 (i) The direction and estimated velocity of the wind during the time the pesticide was applied. This subsection (i) shall not apply to applications of baits in bait stations and pesticide applications within structures; and 0) Any other reasonable information required by the director in rule. (2)(a) The required information shall be recorded on the same day that a pesticide is applied. (b) A commercial pesticide applicator who applies a pesticide to an agricultural crop or agricultural lands shall provide a copy of the records required under subsection (1) of this section for the application to the owner, or to the lessee if applied on behalf of the lessee, of the lands to which the pesticide is applied. Records provided by a commercial pesticide applicator to the owner or lessee of agricultural lands under this subsection need not be provided on a form adopted by the department. (3) The records required under this section shall be maintained and preserved by the licensed pesticide applicator or such other person or entity applying the pesticides for no less than seven years from the date of the application of the pesticide to which such records refer. If the pesticide was applied by a commercial pesticide applicator to the agricultural crop or agricultural lands of person who employs one or more employees, as "employee" is defined in RCW 49.70.020, the records shall also be kept by the employer for a period of seven years from the date of the application of the pesticide to which the records refer. (4)(a) The pesticide records shall be readily accessible to the department for inspection. Copies of the records shall be provided on request to: The department; the department of labor and industries; treating health care personnel initiating diagnostic testing or therapy for a patient with a suspected case of pesticide poisoning; the department of health; the pesticide incident reporting and tracking review panel; and, in the case of an industrial insurance claim filed under Title 51 RCW with the department of labor and industries, the employee or the employee's designated representative. In addition, the director may require the submission of the records on a routine basis within thirty days of the application of any restricted use pesticide in prescribed areas controlling the use of the restricted use pesticide. When a request for records is made under this subsection by treating health care personnel and the record is required for determining treatment, copies of the record shall be provided immediately. For all other requests, copies of the record shall be provided within seventy-two hours. (b) Copies of records provided to a person or entity under this subsection (4) shall, if so requested, be provided on a form adopted under subsection (7) of this section. Information for treating health care personnel shall be made immediately available by telephone, if requested, with a copy of the records provided within twenty-four hours. (5) If a request for a copy of the record is made under this section from an applicator referred to in subsection (1) of this section and the applicator refuses to provide a copy, the requester may notify the department of the request and the applicator's refusal. Within seven working days, the department shall request that the applicator provide the department with all pertinent copies of the records, except that in a medical emergency the request shall be made within two working days. The applicator shall provide copies of the records to the department within twenty-four hours after the department's request. Page 36 of 49 (6) The department shall include inspection of the records required under this section as part of any on -site inspection conducted under this chapter on agricultural lands. The inspection shall determine whether the records are readily transferable to a form adopted by the department and are readily accessible to employees. However, no person subject to a department inspection may be inspected under this subsection (6) more than once in any calendar year, unless a previous inspection has found recordkeeping violations. If recordkeeping violations are found, the department may conduct reasonable multiple inspections, pursuant to rules adopted by the department. Nothing in this subsection (6) limits the department's inspection of records pertaining to pesticide -related injuries, illnesses, fatalities, accidents, or complaints. (7) The department of agriculture and the department of labor and industries shall jointly adopt, by rule, forms that satisfy the information requirements of this section. RCW 17.21.220 Application of chapter to governmental entities -- Public operator license required -- Exemption -- Liability. (1) All state agencies, municipal corporations, and public utilities or any other governmental agency shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter and rules adopted thereunder concerning the application of pesticides. (2) It shall be unlawful for any employee of a state agency, Municipal Corporation, public utility, or any other government agency to use or to supervise the use of any restricted use pesticide, or any pesticide by means of an apparatus, without having obtained a public operator license from the director. Application for a public operator license shall be accompanied by a fee of twenty-five dollars. The fee shall not apply to public operators licensed and working in the health vector field. The public operator Iicense shalI.be valid only when the operator is acting as an employee of a government agency. (3) The jurisdictional health officer or his or her duly authorized representative is exempt from this licensing provision when applying pesticides that are not restricted use pesticides to control pests other than weeds. (4) Such agencies, municipal corporations and public utilities shall be subject to legal recourse by any person damaged by such application of any pesticide, and such action may be brought in the county where the damage or some part thereof occurred. RCW 17.21.410 Landscape applications -- Marking of property, posting requirements.) (1) A certified applicator making a landscape application to: (a) Residential property shall at the time of the application place a marker at the usual point of entry to the property. If the application is made to an isolated spot that is not a substantial portion of the property, the applicator shall only be required to place a marker at the application. site. If the application is in a fenced or otherwise isolated backyard, no marker is required. Page 37 of 49 (b) Commercial properties such as apartments or shopping centers shall at the time of application place a marker in a conspicuous location at or near each site being treated. (c) A golf course shall at the time of the application place a marker at the first tee and tenth tee or post the information in a conspicuous location such as on a central message board. (d) A school, nursery school, or licensed day-care shall at the time of the application place a marker at each primary point of entry to the school grounds. A school employee making an application to a school facility shall comply with the posting requirements in RCW 17.21.415. (e) A park, cemetery, rest stop, or similar property as may be defined in rule shall at the time of the application place a marker at each primary point of entry. (2) An individual making a landscape application to a school grounds, nursery school, or licensed day-care, and not otherwise covered by subsection (1) of this section, shall at the time of the application place a marker at each primary point of entry to the school grounds. (3) The marker shall be a minimum of four inches by five inches. It shall have the words: "THIS LANDSCAPE HAS BEEN TREATED BY" as the headline and "FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL" as the footer. Larger size requirements for markers may be established in rule for specific applications. The company name and service mark shall be included between the headline and the footer on a marker placed by a commercial applicator. The applicator's telephone number where information can be obtained about the application shall be included in the footer of the marker. Markers shall be printed in colors contrasting to the background. (4) The property owner or tenant shall remove the marker according to the schedule established in rule. A certified applicator or individual who complies with this section is not liable for the removal of markers by unauthorized persons or removal outside the designated removal time. (5) A certified applicator or individual who complies with this section cannot be held liable for personal property damage or bodily injury resulting from markers that are placed as required. RCW 17.21.415 Schools -- Policies and methods -- Notification -- Records -- Liability. (1) As used in this section, "school" means a licensed day-care center or a public kindergarten or a public elementary or secondary school. (2) A school shall provide written notification annually or upon enrollment to parents or guardians of students and employees describing the school's pest control policies and methods, including the posting and notification requirements of this section. (3) A school shall establish a notification system that, as a minimum, notifies interested parents or guardians of students and employees at least forty-eight hours before a pesticide application to a school facility. The notification system shall include posting of the notification in a prominent place in the main office of the school. Page 38 of 49 (4) All notifications to parents, guardians, and employees shall include the heading "Notice: Pesticide Application" and, at a minimum, shall state: (a) The product name of the pesticide to be applied; (b)The intended date and time of application; (c) The location to which the pesticide is to be applied; (d) The pest to be controlled; and (e) The name and phone number of a contact person at the school. (5) A school facility application must be made within forty-eight hours following the intended date and time stated in the notification or the notification process shall be repeated. (6) A school shall, at the time of application, post notification signs for all pesticide applications made to school facilities unless the application is otherwise required to be posted by a certified applicator under the provisions of RCW 17.21.41 Q(l)(d). (a) Notification signs for applications made to school grounds by school employees shall be placed at the location of the application and at each primary point of entry to the school grounds. The signs shall be a minimum of four inches by five inches and shall include the words: "THIS LANDSCAPE HAS BEEN RECENTLY SPRAYED OR TREATED WITH PESTICIDES BY YOUR SCHOOL" as the headline and "FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL" as the tooter. The footer shall provide the name and telephone number of a contact person at the school. (b) Notification signs for applications made to school facilities other than school grounds shall be posted at the location of the application. The signs shall be a minimum of eight and one-half by eleven inches and shall include the heading "Notice: Pesticide Application" and, at a minimum, shall state: (i) The product name of the pesticide applied; (ii) The date and time of application; (iii) The location to which the pesticide was applied; (iv) The pest to be controlled; and (v) The name and phone number of a contact person at the school. (c) Notification signs shall be printed in colors contrasting to the background. (d) Notification signs shall remain in place for at least twenty-four hours from the time the application is completed. In the event the pesticide label requires a restricted entry interval greater than twenty-four hours, the notification sign shall remain in place consistent with the restricted entry interval time as required by the label. (7) A school facility application does not include the application of -antimicrobial pesticides or the placement of insect or rodent baits that are not accessible to children. (8) The prenotification requirements of this section do not apply if the school facility application is made when the school is not occupied by students for at least two consecutive days after the application. Page 39 of 49 (9) The prenotification requirements of this section do not apply to any emergency school facility application for control of any pest that poses an immediate human health or safety threat, such as an application to control stinging insects. When an emergency school facility application is made, notification consistent with the schooI's notification system shall occur as soon as possible after the application. The notification shall include information consistent with subsection (G)(b) of this section. (10) A school shall make the records of all pesticide applications to school facilities required under this chapter, including an annual summary of the records, readily accessible to interested persons. (11) A school is not liable for the removal of signs by unauthorized persons. A school that complies with this section may not be held liable for personal property damage or bodily inJuiy resulting from signs that are placed as required. Page 40 of 49 Commercial Landscape Applications RCW 17.21.410 (1)(d) RCW 17.21.410 Landscape applications --Marking of property, posting requirements. (1) A certified applicator making a landscape application to: (a) Residential property shall at the time of the application place a marker at the usual point of entry to the properly. If the application is made to an isolated spot that is not a substantial portion of the property, the applicator shall only be required to place a marker at the application site. If the application is in a fenced or otherwise isolated backyard, no marker is required. (b) Commercial properties such as apartments or shopping centers shall at the time of application place a marker in a conspicuous location at or near each site being treated. (c) A golf course shall at the time of the application place a marker at the first tee and tenth tee or post the information in a conspicuous location such as on a central message board. (d) A school, nursery school, or licensed day-care shall at the time of the application place a marker at each primary point of entry to the school grounds. (e) A park, cemetery, rest stop, or similar property as may be defined in rule shall at the time of the application place a marker at each primary point of entry. (2) An individual making a landscape application to a school grounds, nursery school, or licensed day-care, and not otherwise covered by subsection (1) of this section; shall be required to comply with the posting requirements in subsection (1)(d) of this section. (3) The marker shall be a minimum of four inches by five inches. It- shall have the words: "THIS LANDSCAPE HAS BEEN TREATED BY" as the headline and "FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL" as the footer. Larger size requirements for markers may be established in rule for specific applications. The company name and service mark with the applicator's telephone number where information can be obtained shall be included between the headline and the footer on the marker. The letters and service marks shall be printed in colors contrasting to the background. (4) The property owner or tenant shall remove the marker according to the schedule established in rule. A commercial applicator is not liable for the removal of markers by unauthorized persons or removal outside the designated removal time. (5) A certified applicator who complies with this section cannot be held liable for personal property damage or bodily injury resulting from markers that are placed as required. [1994 c 283 § 33; 1992 c 176 § 5.1 Page 41 of 49 Pesticide Storage Rules WAC 16-228-1220 (6) & (7) WAC 16-228-1220 (6) & (7) (6) Requirements for unattended pesticides and their containers: (a) Good generally accepted housekeeping practices shall be maintained for all pesticides and their containers. (b) The provisions of (d) and (e) of this subsection and subsection (7) of this section shall not apply to empty pesticide containers when adequately decontaminated (e.g., three successive rinsings); shall not apply to categories 2, 3, and 4 pesticide formulations labeled for home and garden use only. (c) For the purposes of (d) and (e) of this subsection and subsection (7) of this section, pesticides and their containers at the loading area shall not be considered unattended during the spraying operation if the operator maintains either visual control or repeatedly returns at closely spaced intervals. (d) Pesticides labeled with the signal word "danger/poison" and their containers shall be stored in one of the following enclosures which, when unattended, shall be so constructed and locked (except (v) below) to prevent children, unauthorized persons, livestock, or other animals from gaining entry. (i) Closed vehicle. (ii) Closed trailer. (iii) Building or room or fenced area with a fence at least six feet high. (iv) Foot locker or other container which can be locked. (v) Unattended trucks or trailers which have solid sideracks and secured tailgate at least six feet above ground, ramp or platform level. (vi) Bulk storage containers fifty gallons and larger with tight screw -type bungs and/or secured or locked valves. (e) Pesticides labeled with the signal word "danger when not accompanied by the signal word poison, pesticides labeled with the signal word "warning" and pesticides labeled with the signal word 'caution" and their containers shall be stored if) secured storage out of the reach of children in one of the enclosures listed in (d) of this subsection: Provided, That metal containers, twenty-eight gallons and larger, with tight screw -type bungs and/or secured or locked valves and sealed five gallon containers (requiring tool to unseal) shall be considered secured storage. (7) Requirements for posting of storage area for pesticides [and their containers labeled with the signal words "clanger/poison"]: (a) For purposes of this subsection, warning signs shall show the skull and crossbones symbol and the words: 'Danger/Poison (or Pesticide or Chemical) Storage Area/Keep Out" in letters large enough to be legible at a distance of thirty feet. (b) Warning signs shall be posted: (i) On enclosures specified in subsection (6)(d) of this section, when such enclosures are unattended; (ii) At each entrance or exit from a storage area and on each exterior wall, so that a sign is visible from any direction; (iii) If the pesticide storage area is contained in a larger, multipurpose structure, warning signs shall be clearly visible on each exterior wall of the structure within thirty feet of the pesticide storage area and from the main entrance to the larger structure: Provided, That Page 42 of 49 posting of the main entrance shall not be required, if a sign is visible from the entrance which clearly identifies the possibility that pesticides may be stored on the premises, (i.e., XYZ Pest Control or XYZ Wood Treatment, Inc.); How To Comply Manual for Worker Protection Standards In 1992, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted the federal Worker Protection Standard to protect agricultural workers, including pesticide handlers and applicators, from pesticides and their residues. In order to assist agricultural employers comply with the WPS, EPA has updated its I -low to Cams l ,, manual. Although this manual includes changes to the federal standard in the last decade, it does not address more restrictive Washington State requirements for decontamination and training that are found in Washingtoji`s Worker Protection Standard. These more restrictive state requirements are addressed in the WSDA Manual Insert. Washington agricultural employers can order a free copy of the How to Comply manual as well as many other WPS compliance and training resources from the National Agriculture Compliance Assistance Center. In Washington, the departments of agriculture and labor & industries jointly enforce WPS. Questions can be directed to a variety of stale and federal contacts. Internet resources for schools http.://�qww.ecy.wa.gov/programs/swfa/upest/,8choolManuals-htmI Page 43 of 49 State of Washington PESTICIDE APPLICATION RECORD (Version 1_Fecifity) Department of Agriculture Olympia, Washington 98504 NOTE: This form must be completed same day as the application and It must be retained for 7 years (Ref. ROW 17.21) 1. Date of Application - Year: .... 2001,,,, —, month: ........ J.LJlly ................. Day:....... 1.5............ Time:.7:Q0.arr)-.4:30,prrt 2. Name of Person for whom the pesticide was applied:................................................................................................................... Firm Name (if applicable): Anytoum Sch001 District.......................................................................................................... Street Address: 21.9. c?.GI1.Rai140...................................... City:. ARY.j4?VVX!....................... State: MA... Zip:.9$OdO..... 3. Licensed Applicator's Narne (if different from #2 above): ... T.ifn.Qthy.TjmJPer........................... License No. ...99990............. Firm Name (if applicable):.............Santa aS#2.,..............,............................,...........Tel. No.......,. 555.999;f3Q00.... I.......... StreetAddress: ......... .......................................................... City: ....................... .................... State: ........... Zip:............,..... 4. Name of person(s) who applied the pesticide (if different from 93 above): ................ ...... .......................... . ....... .................... ... License No(s). if applicable: ..... — .................................................................................. 5. Application Crop or Site., ....... PKP9sed wood, n_maintence building.............................................................................. 6. Total Area Treated (acre, sq. ft., etc.):. 6,450 S Ft:................................................................................................................ 7. Was this application made as a result of a WSDA Permit? W No ❑ Yes (if yes, give Permit No. #................................. 8_ Pesticide Information (please list all information for each pesticide in the tank mix): c) Total Amount of d) Pesticide Pesticide Applied Applied/Acre e) Concentration a) Product Name b) EPA Reg. No. in Area Treated (or other measure) Applied Tlrnbor (two applications) 64405-8 64.5 Lb 5 Gal mix/ 1 lb / Gal Power s ra er) 1 NOW (10%) solution as a surface Way 9. Address or exact location of application. NOTE: if the application is made to one acre or more of agricultural land, the field location must be shown on the map on page two of this form. Elwood J. Learning Middle School 1919 Earlyteen St. Anytown 10. Wind direction and estimated velocity during the application:..... N/A ............................ ............... --........... 11. Temperature during the application: ........... I ............. ...... �6....7$,degrees.,............................................. 12. Apparatus license plate number (if applicable): ................ X-0-0.0 ............... ..................................... - .... 13. ❑Air ❑ Ground ❑ Chemigation 14. Miscellaneous Information: TVvo applications two hours apart to exposed wood in the rnaintenence building. AGn 4M (Rm 4(09) Page 44 of 49 �a) CD t 9v 0)i O')Oa (ram 4 i a�� m a mo amia C _ c a C N N yc2g i(+J L d y0 c 'a E 0 c cc O r m o C- ~ M a1 O ?� u) E f ' � aRa n a _ ++ U D) C F]C i c a CL o i m 0 O E° O L° 0 v s cam o € ur To: v, E lL �, v; (7i a o i i m ap m ; m c c O m d a CV •c6 y M O o. 'd f i i - � irE to _•� ` � � ; A ti Ln: w a; 16. � d� € �N: of ai �€ e r. Ea: ca 3 m O: c;, 7 Li [.(�i to a 42 E 4 3 ? -T Z R c E � ran IRV `o ¢ d•; -� a i : a E Liv. i O i i ll7i i a rL o m o p W °i iac. o o O s r Qi i n o ai : Oi p i O 2 c•1: as ¢dog CD O q N a OCL 76 cc7 102 O: ovLn OQO? Y aC cg iY .O c rn c•rn a Jc ; m mQ U H a1 b c CL c�o, n �eCS?OEZVi'¢ }CC ci ° OND w �: •E�mew �� `��+vrcoi yE�O ��a E m r E E r E E 3 aci m ?; Q �jv m y r- o O ca O t3 C O m m oE' c: r: Oa ;� rffrC mE O coo a tioC a z DNS Q�: a�zNQ oi=a N c� r0 c,7 N ocr) ox w ri w; ¢ m trico 00 Page 45 of 49 11 State of. Washington PESTICIDE APPLICATION RECORD (Version 1_Landscape) Department of Agriculture Olympia, Washington 98504 NOTE: This form must be completed Same day as the application and it must be retained for 7 years (Ref. RCW 17.21) 1. Date of Application - Year:... Z Q1......... Month: ........ MAY ................. Day: ...... 24.... ........ 2. Name of Person for whom the pesticide was applied: ............................. ................................................................ ................ Firm Name (if applicable):.A11�ItOlNt1_SchOQI,D'IstriCi.......................................................................................................... Street Address: .21.1..0R..9111 r.........:............................ City:. Anytown....................... state: MA... zip:.9800D..... 3. Licensed Applicator's Name (if different from #2 above): ... G117000n-0reeff ...............:........... License No. ,. 999.9;9............. Firm Name (i[ applicable): ... Same as#2.......................................................Tel. No.......... 555.999.0©00............... StreetAddress: ......................................................................... City:........................................... State:........... Zip:.................. 4, Name of person(s) who applied the pesticide (if different from #3 above): .................................................................................... ............................................................... License No(s). if applicable:.......................................................................................... 5. Application Crop of Site: ...... .S1dewaicsanddrives................................................................................................... 6. Total Area Treated (acre, sq. ft., etc.):.5r2N Ag:, R ................ ......... ............. ................ ................................................ ............ i. Was this application -made as a result of a WSDA Permit? QdNo ❑ Yes (it yes, give Permit No.) # ................................. 8. Pesticide Information (please list all information for each pesticide in the tank mix): c) Total Amount of d) Pesticide Pesticide Applied Applied/Acre e) Concentration a) Product Name b) EPA Reg. No. in Area Treated (or other measure) Applied Roundup Pro 524-476 9.75 Oz. Spot 6,5 Oz / Gal (Backpack sprayer) (5%) solution / 9. Address or exact location of application. NOTE: if the application is made to one acre or more of agricultural land, the field location must be shown on the map on page two of this form, Booking Elementary School 6565 Teaching Road Anytown 10. Wind direction and estimated velocity during the application:.... ." ....MPH from Wesf ,, 11. Temperature during the application: ................... ...........55.:.60. degrees..................... ......................... 12. Apparatus license plate number (if applicable): .......................................................................................... 13. ❑ Air 1:2 Ground ❑ Chemigation 14. Miscellaneous Information: Spot treat weeds on sidewalks and drives AGR 4228 (AW. 4W) Page 46 of 49 Swo of Washinglon PESTICIDE APPLICATION RECORD (Version 1) oepartmanl of Agricultw6 Olympia, Wuhlnpton W504 NOTE: This form must be completed same day as the application and it must be retained for 7 years (Ref. RCW 17.21) 1. Date of Application - Year: ...................... Month:................................. Day:......,................ Time: ........... ....... ............................. 2. Name of Person for whom the pesticide was applied: ............................................................. ...... Firm Name (if applicable):........................................................................................................ Street Address: ................... City:...,....................................,.. State:........... Zip:...,,............. 3. Licensed Applicator's Name (if different from #2 above):.................................. ........... ................. License No...,....,................,... FirmName (if applicable): ..... ....................................................................................... Tel. No. ............ ................. I ......... I............ StreetAddress: .......................................................................... City:........................................... State:.,......... Zip:.................. 4. Name of person(s) who applied the pesticide (if different from #3 above): ................................ ......................... .............. .......... .......... ...... ......... ,..................................... License No(s). if applicable:....,....,................................,............................................... 5. Application Crop or Site:.........,,........................................,,.,...............,..,..........,...........................,.....,.................,,,.........I........... 6. Total Area Treated (acre, sq. ft., etc.):............................,.,.,..............,........................,....,,.......,........,......,............I..............I........ 7. Was this application made as a result of a WSDA Permit? ❑ No ❑ Yes (if yes, give Permit No.) # ................................... 8. Pesticide Information (please list all 'information for each pesticide in the tank mix): c) Total Amount of d) Pesticide Pesi(clde Applied AppliedtAcre e) Concentration a) Product Name b) EPA Reg. No. in Area Treated (or other measure) Applied S. Address or exact location of application. NOTE: if the application is made to one acre or more of agricultural land, the field location must be shown on the map on page two of this form. 10. Wind direction'and estimated velocity during the application:.............., ••• 11, Temperature during the application: .................. I ........................ I ...... I ........................................... . .............. 12. Apparatus license plate number (if applicable):................................................................................ 13. ❑ Air ❑ Ground ❑ Chemigation 14. Miscellaneous Information: AGR 4226 (ROY. 4199) Page 47 of 49 d d Om m c U J a a w U W a. i� v J r� g n } tf E 0. i �zC i � a o m U�^y 0 0. n m z 3z i . 3 � i _ •� F I } c 1 ` iz - i CL _ F 5 e i o ma.mc i � f i i I i i E t O10 i r z g c0 I i i } 7 4 a W z - _ = iC� CL �iIL a � } C6 of t6 i _ } v } LLI i IL Eo } a � O } ¢ W m E � C I c i = o G �pcl E Q00 aC7U Qt7U a(7U N r �o-3 L L L }ca Page 48 of 49 WSDA — PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT DIVISION Contact Any Pesticide Office by calling Toll Free: 1-877-301-4555 OLYMPIA Offices: PO Box 42589 — Olympia — WA 98504-2589 Fax: (360) 902-2093 Administration Phone: (360) 902-2010 �mwchfii a r.n a. env Bob Arrington, Laurie Mauerman, Robin Bourgois, Ann Wick Compliance Phone: (360) 902-2040 ................. ........................................ ... ...... I ................ crrm liaiiceFr a r.wa.Lnv Cliff Weed, Joel Kangiser (Case Review Officer), Dan Suomi, Kathi' rschoen-ncssa cr�agr.wa.crr Matherly (Pesticide Sensitive Registry), Catherine Bowman, Robin jkamaisc ribs r..va.gov Schoen-Nessa, Jeff Britt, Val Davis, Paul Figueroa Licensing & Recertification Phone: 1-877-301-4555 l icen seedha ur. %va. eov Margaret Tucker, Hugh Watson Lois Hagen, Patricia Bertsch, Rickie Lehto, Tracy Furey (Licensing) Irene Beckman, Haydee Pingol (Recertification Course Accreditation) Registration, Phone: (360) 902-2027 ....................................................................................... pestre rr?a r.wa.gn�r Ted Maxwell, Mike Norman, Angela Owen Product Re istration Lizette Beckman Erik Johansen, Lynn Sheridan*(Fertilizer/Pet Food), Shannon Lumsden, Steve Foss Waste Pesticide Collection Phone: (360) 902-2056 .................................... I........................ wastePe5ticide.4ilagr. wa.g o Joe Hoffman, Laurie Crose, Erika Shaffer �T MOSES LAKE Branch Phone: (509) 766-2575 ................... ........ ........................... .......... Fax: (509) 766-2576 ......... 821 E Broadway — Suite 4 — Moses Lake WA 98837-5934 tschultzrc a r..va.ecyv Tom Hoffmann, Byron Fitch (Compliance/Chemigation) SPOKANE Branch Phone: (509) 533-2690 ............................................................................... Fax: (509) 533-2621 222 N Havana— Suite 203 —Spokane WA 99202-4776 tsehultrc aar.nva.eov Tim Schultz, Jeff Zeller, Scott Nielsen WENATCHEE Branch Phone: (509) 664-3171 .................................................... Fax: (509) 664-3170 1505 N Miller St— Suite 140 — Wenatchee WA 98801-1569 l buckner 6 kigr.wn.gov Bruce Olson, Matt West, David Zamora YAKIMA Branch Phone: (509) 225-2640 Fax: (509) 575-2210 ................................................................................ 21 N I" Ave — Suite 140 — Yakima WA 98902-2663 g_bucknertrt gpr.wa.g_ov Gary Buckner, Gail Amos, Lee Barigar, Chris Sutherland Page 49 of 49 -HCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPf 2300 COLMMIA COMER, 701 5TE AVE �� SEATTLE, TPA 90104 Order No.: 1345567 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County, to -wit: SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) VESTED IN: FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT ##210 EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $ 5 0 0 .0 0 TAX: $ 47.50 Records examined to July 16, 2012 at 8 : 0 0 A.M. CHICAGO TITLE INSU RANGE COMPANY RESUBMITTED MAR 19 2914 By DARYL S IS CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Title Offi r CDS {200 628-5610 SHPLATA/12-590/LTK ''-ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP! Order No.: 1345567 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT C0UNTY ROADS; AND THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF 16TH AVENUE SOUTH AS NOW ESTABLISHED, AND ALSO ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WESTERLY OF NEW PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED 16TH AVENUE SOUTH AS VACATED UNDER KING COUNTY ORDINANCE NUMBER 1938; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20071224000367; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20081216001287. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1345567 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. — - ....... �_...._ _.._.,.__....- _.._ ...._ _ .-...--- --- ........ H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessment's and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). SHPLATB/031694/soe CHICAGO TTI'LE INSURANCE COMPANY .HCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPL Order No.: 1345567 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: LEASE AGREEMENT PURPOSE: INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES AFFECTS: NORTHEASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: MAY 7, 1970 RECORDING NUMBER: GG48053 a 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: WATER DISTRICT NO. 124 PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: SOUTHEASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: nMY 5, 1973 RECORDING NUMBER: 7307050473 c 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT PURPOSE: WATER MAINS WITH NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: PORTIONS OF SAID PREMISES AS DESCRIBED THEREIN. RECORDED: MARCH 10, 1987 RECORDING NUMBER: 8703100815 v 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER PURPOSE: WATER FACILITIES AND NECESSARY APPURTENANCES AREA AFFECTED: PORTIONS OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: OCTOBER 18, 1990 RECORDING NUMBER: 9010180755 a AMENDMENT AND/OR MODIFICATION OF SAID EASEMENT: RECORDED: AUGUST 31, 1993 RECORDING NUMBER: 9308310310 CI-HCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY '�HiCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPI Order No.: 1345567 F c x I XA x L SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PURPOSE: DRAINAGE AREA AFFECTED: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES AS DESCRIBED THEREIN RECORDED: DECEMBER 24, 2007 RECORDING NUMBER: 20071224000369 6. PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE EASEMENTS, IF ANY, IN EXISTENCE, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF THE REAL ESTATE UNDER SEARCH LYING WITHIN VACATED STREETS. 7. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: WATER DISTRICT NO. 124 AND: FEDERAL, WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 210 RECORDED: NOVEMBER 13, 1985 RECORDING NUMBER: 8511130G73 REGARDING: CONNECTION TO A DISTRICT WATER MAIN THE LIEN CREATED BY PARAGRAPH 15 OF SAID AGREEMENT IS SATISFIED AND RELEASED PURSUANT TO CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION AND RELEASE OF LIEN RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8703100612. 8. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AND: FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 210 RECORDED: JUNE 19, 1989 RECORDING NUMBER: 8906190127 REGARDING: WATER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES THE LIEN CREATED BY PARAGRAPH 21 OF SAID AGREEMENT IS SATISFIED AND RELEASED PURSUANT TO CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION AND RELEASE OF LIEN RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9311180356. 9. DECLARATION OF COVENANT ASSOCIATED WITH FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL FACILITIES AS PROVIDED IN NEW SECTION 10 OF ORDINANCE 4938, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: JULY 19, 1989 8907190407 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHP1AT93/12-IMO/M :-lICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPI M x Y Order No.: 1345567 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS 10. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND: US WEST COMMUNICATIONS INC. RECORDED: DECEMBER 22, 1999 RECORDING NUMBER: 19991222000002 REGARDING: TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, ELECTRIC FACILITIES AND APPURTENANCES, WITH EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS RELATED THERETO 11. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 210 AND: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY RECORDED: DECEMBER 24, 2007 RECORDING NUMBER: 20071224000368 REGARDING: RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, IRRIGATION, AND PROPERTY RESTORATION 12. LEASE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: LESSOR: FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 210 LES.SEE :.- - _..- .-....__...:.__ KING. COUNTY, NA IE.T.NG.TON. FOR A TERM OF: 40 YEARS RECORDED: MAY 7, 1970 RECORDING NUMBER: 6648053 AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT: ASSIGNOR: ASSIGNEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY CITY OF FEDERAL WAY JANUARY 3, 2003 20030103002840 NOTE: SAID LEASE APPEARS TO HAVE EXPIRED; HOWEVER, NO CONVEYANCE TO THE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COINRANY SHPI.ATW/12-12A0/EK ^rCAGO TITLE INSURANCE CONT41— Order No.: 1345567 0 P SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR TITLE TO THE POOL AS REQUIRED BY SAID ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT IS FOUND OF RECORD. 13. INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER AGREEMENT, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY CITY OF FEDERAL WAY JANUARY 3, 2003 20030103002839 14. TERMS AND PROVISIONS AS CONTAINED IN ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT: BETWEEN: AND: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES KING COUNTY CITY OF FEDERAL WAY JANUARY 3, 2003 20030103002840 NOTE: LEASE REFERRED TO THEREIN APPEARS TO HAVE EXPIRED; HOWEVER, NO CONVEYANCE TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR TITLE TO THE POOL AS REQUIRED BY ._SAID_ AG EMENT __,�F9UND -QF .. RECORD . _ _..._...�... 9 15. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW: RECORDED: JANUARY 3, 2003 RECORDING NUMBER: 20030103002841 AFFECTS: PORTION OF SAID PREMISES NOTE: LEASE REFERRED TO THEREIN APPEARS TO HAVE EXPIRED; HOWEVER, NO CONVEYANCE TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR TITLE TO THE POOL AS REQUIRED BY SHPIATB3/ 12-12-90/Ec CMCAGO TITLB INSURANCE COMPANY MCAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPt Order No.: 1345567 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20030103002840 IS FOUND OF RECORD. it 16. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED IN DEED: GRANTEE: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: KING COUNTY AUGUST 7, 1957 4822182 s 17. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF NOTICE OF CHARGES BY WATER, SEWER, AND/OR STORM AND SURFACE WATER UTILITIES, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8106010916. r 18. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8703109001, AS FOLLOWS: FENCES DO NOT CONFORM TO BOUNDARY LINES. v 19. MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20000324900005, AS FOLLOWS: PORTION OF CONCRETE WALK LIES WITHIN A SOUTHEASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES. v 20. THE PROPERTY HEREIN ASCRIBED .I,S- CARRIED_-O%+I.--TI3F.----�X ROLLS AS EXEMPT. HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE ON THE DATE OF THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR FROM THAT DATE. TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 082104-9001-03 LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ NOT DISCLOSED ASSESSED VALUE -IMPROVEMENT: $ NOT DISCLOSED rr 21. SPECIAL TAXES FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT AND/OR OTHER SPECIAL CHARGES: 1ST HALF DELINQUENT MAY 1ST, 2ND HALF DELINQUENT NOVEMBER 1ST: YEAR: 2012 AMOUNT BILLED: $ 7.80 AMOUNT PAID: $ 7.80 AMOUNT DUE: $ 0.00 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 082104-9001-03 LEVY CODE: 1205 SHPLATB3 /12-12-90/FK CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP! Order No.: 1345567 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS s 22. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT OUR SEARCH DID NOT DISCLOSE ANY OPEN DEEDS OF TRUST OF RECORD. IF YOU SHOULD HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF ANY OUTSTANDING OBLIGATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE TITLE DEPARTMENT IMMEDIATELY FOR FURTHER REVIEW PRIOR TO CLOSING. AB Ax 23. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY, RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY INSTALLED UPON SAID PROPERTY AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. MATTERS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST, ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES GIVEN AS SECURITY, FINANCING STATEMENTS AND OTHER SECURITY INTERESTS AFFECTING THE RIGHTS OF LESSEES ONLY. 24. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, GRANTEE ON THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: GRANTOR: JANUARY 3, 2003 20030103002841 KING COUNTY AFFECTS: IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT LOCATED ON PORTION OF SAID PREMISES NOTE: -NO -.CONVEYANCE _ T0.. THE. .S.CHOOL_DISTR.IC.T..-FDR..TI.TLE.. TO .THE. POOL AS REQUIRED BY ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20030103002840 IS FOUND OF RECORD. 25. THE EFFECT, IF ANY, OF INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT: GRANTOR: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY GRANTEE: FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 210 RECORDED: AUGUST 12, 1994 RECORDING NUMBER: 9408120499 NOTE: SAID INSTRUMENT DOES NOT CONTAIN A LEGAL DESCRIPTION. AC 26. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS CERTIFICATE IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS. PLEASE NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO EXPECTATIONS. SHPCATB3/12-12-90/EK CHICAGO'nTLE INSURANCE COMPANY `3ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP1 Order No.: 1345567 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS AD NOTE 1: A SURVEY HAS BEEN RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 8504179001. As NOTE 2: ANY MAP FURNISHED WITH THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR CONVENIENCE IN LOCATING THE LAND INDICATED HEREIN WITH REFERENCE TO STREETS AND OTHER LAND. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED BY REASON OF RELIANCE THEREON. AF NOTE 3: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: PORTION NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF SECTION 8-21-4 AND PORTION NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF SECTION 9-21-4. END OF SCHEDULE B SHPLATB3/ 12-12-90/EK CHICAGU TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT SHORT REPORT CULTURAL RESOURCES OVERVIEW FOR THE FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL PROJECT, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Report Prepared for Federal Way School District By Amber Earley July 17, 2014 Project No. 29798 Report No. 14-364 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION — NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 5418 20`h Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98107 Author: Amber Earl Title of Report: Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project King County Washington Date of Report: July 17, 2014 County(ies): King Section: 8 Township: 21 Range: 4 E Quad: Poverty Bay Acres: 40 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) Yes Historic Properly Export Files submitted? Yes M No Archaeological Site s llsolate s Found or Amended? F Yes No TCP s found? F Yes M No Re lace a draft? Yes FI No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? 71 Yes # No Were Human Remains Found? ❑ Yes DAHP Case # M No DAHP Archaeological Site #: SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Short Report A. INTRODUCTION 1. Proposed project activities and elements: The Federal Way School District (FWSD) plans to replace the existing Federal Way High School with a new building in approximately the same location as the existing building (Figure 1). Other associated improvements include grading for parking, fields, and storm water management ponds. The project is subject to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and requires permits from the City of Federal Way (the City). The City's adopted SEPA policies (FWRC 14.25.070) allow the City to condition the proposed action as it relates to potential adverse impacts that would result from the project. Based on those policies, the City is requiring mitigation measures due to the project's proximity to Cold Creek, Steel Lake, and Redondo Beach and the potential for the site to contain cultural resources. Prior to issuance of a building or site development permit FWPS must submit a cultural resource assessment, prepared by a qualified professional, to the City Community Development Department and Brandon Reynon of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians 2. Study Area vertical and horizontal depth of disturbance: The maximum depth of excavation will be for storm water ponds in the southwest corner of the project area (Figure 2). Geotechnical investigations for the project have identified up to 11 feet of fill overlying glacial sediments. The storm water grading will extend into the sterile glacial material. Elsewhere in the project area, glacial sediments are at or near the surface, and project excavations will extend into sterile glacial material. 3. Project Background Key Information Location: Section 8, Township 21 N., Range 4 E., Willamette Meridian (Figure 1) Size: 40 acres Project Federal Way School District Proponent: Agency Name: City of Federal Way Regulatory SEPA Setting: Survey N/A Personnel: Survey Date N/A Report Author: Amber Earley Report Date: July 17, 2014 Other Brandon Reynon, Puyallup Indian Tribe Cultural Resources, was contacted individuals/ by telephone on June 30, 2014 to discuss the project. He indicated that the organizations: proximity of the project to Cold Creek, Steel Lake, and Redondo suggests that pre -contact campsites and hunting/gathering areas are likely in the project vicinity. SWCA Environmental Consultants 1 July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School B. NATURAL AND CULTURAL SETTING 1. Natural Setting The end of the Pleistocene, the last great ice age, marked the beginning of the evolution of the modern landscape, climate and vegetation in the region. Glacial retreat began shortly after 16,950 cal BP (calibrated years before present), and by 16,575 cal BP, the Seattle area was ice free (Porter and Swanson 1998). Archaeological evidence indicates that people were living in what is now western Washington by 11,000 BP, and possibly earlier. Changing environmental conditions since then, including sea level and climate variation and tectonic activity, have affected the kinds and distribution of resources used by people in the past as well as the suitability of particular landforms for occupation. Environmental changes also have consequences for the archaeological record in terms of site visibility and preservation. Information about recent land use comes from ethnographic and historic records. Geology and Geomorphology The project is within a geographic province known as the Puget Lowland, which separates the Olympic Mountains from the Western Cascades and was formed by glacial advance and retreat in the late Pleistocene and by climatic changes since the melting of the glaciers. During the Vashon Stade of the Fraser glaciation, the Puget Lobe of the Cordilleran ice sheet reached the Seattle area by 17,590 cal B.P. and as far south as Tenino, about 138 km (86 miles) southwest of the project, its maximum extent, about 16,950 cal B.P. (Porter and Swanson 1998). At the end of the Pleistocene, large glacial lakes formed in the ice -scoured troughs between the glaciated uplands as the Puget Lobe melted. The Seattle area was ice free by 16,575 cal B.P., but remained inundated by Glacial Lake Russell and Glacial Lake Bretz until a northern spillway linking the Puget Sound and Pacific Ocean was uncovered from below the ice (Porter and Swanson 1998; Thorson 1980, 1989). Federal Way sits on an elevated stretch of glacial deposits called the Des Moines Island, which extends from the Duwamish Head in the north to Sumner in the south and from the Puget Sound in the west to the Green and White River valleys in the east. Between 300 and 500 feet above sea level, the Des Moines Island was surrounded by water for a short time as the ice sheets retreated (Caster 2004). The project area is on this glacial upland. The surfaces of glacial uplands have not been significantly modified in the Holocene, with the exception of soil formation processes. As a result, pre -contact cultural materials found on the glacial upland would probably not be buried deeper than one meter below the surface, or the base of the B horizon formed in glacial soil. Soils in the project area are mapped as Arents, Alderwood material, which forms on till plains (NRCS 2014). Historic soil maps show a wetland in the southwest corner of the project area (Figure 3). Two recent geotechnical borings were excavated in the southwest portion of the project where deep excavations will be taking place, and encountered fill material at about seven to 11 feet below surface (EB-9 and EB-10, Figure 4) (Associated Earth Sciences 2014). Peat was noted below the fill, indicating that the wetland was present for some time. On the east side of the project area near Pacific Highway, borings encountered Vashon age glacial till either at the surface (EB-1) or directly beneath fill (EB-2). The remaining borings (EB-3 to EB-8) encountered deposits that pre -date the Fraser glaciation (Associated Earth Sciences 2014). The project is near Steel Lake and Easter Lake, which is in the general location of the wetland on the soil map mentioned above (Figure 3). Cold Creek originates from Easter Lake and flows along SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School S. 3081h street just southwest of the project area, enters a culvert, and resurfaces at 3061h street before flowing through a steep ravine into Puget Sound (Kerwin and Nelson 2000). Flora and Fauna The area was once covered with extensive stands of coniferous forest that comprise the Tsuga heterophylla (western hemlock) vegetation zone. The dominant species in this zone are western hemlock, western red cedar, and Douglas fir. Old growth forest understories are typically dense, consisting of shrubs and herbaceous species dominated by sword fern, salal, Oregon grape, ocean spray, blackberry, red huckleberry, and red elderberry (Franklin and Dyrness 1973). Bigleaf maple and red alder are common in moist areas subject to disturbance; stream courses and flood plains are dominated by red alder, black cottonwood, bigleaf maple, and other riparian plants. Wetlands are common in river valleys and throughout the area and typically support willow, alder, cranberries, cattail, reeds, wapato, nettles, and skunk cabbage (Frenkel and Heinitz 1987:48). In the immediate project vicinity, a range of habitats support large terrestrial mammals like deer, elk, black bear, and mountain lion. Smaller fur bearing mammals including rabbit, wolf, muskrat, beaver, mink, coyote, raccoon, and bobcat were available, and gained great economic importance during the fur trade era and again during the economic depressions of the early twentieth century. People were particularly adapted to the nearby lake environment where a plethora of fish, waterfowl and plants were harvested for food and utilitarian resources (Kruckeberg 1991). Historically, salmon have been a singularly important species for Native American populations. Three species of salmon (chinook, chum, and coho) move through southern Puget Sound on their way to spawning streams in the Puyallup, White and Green River basins (Kerwin and Nelson 2000; Wydoski and Whitney 2003). Modern studies of salmon habitat did not identify salmon in Cold Creek, but noted that locals have reported seeing coho and chum in its lower reaches (Kerwin and Nelson 2000). Paleoenvironments Vegetation composition and animal distributions in the Puget Lowland have changed significantly since the end of the Pleistocene. Lodgepole pine colonized newly deglaciated surfaces, followed by Douglas fir, white pine, spruce, and alder (Barnosky 1984). Between approximately 10,000 BP and 6000 BP, the climate of the Pacific Northwest was warmer and drier than that of today, with drought -like conditions in the summers (Whitlock 1992). Forests were more open, and prairies were common, particularly in areas within the Olympic rain shadow and in gravelly outwash soils. Conditions similar to those of today began to develop after 6000 BP as temperatures cooled and precipitation increased. By about 5000 BP, closed forests of western red cedar, western hemlock and Douglas fir had become established (Whitlock 1992). An increase in woodworking tools found at archaeological sites dating to this period may correspond with the maturation of western red cedar forests (Hebda 1984). Climate and vegetation have remained generally stable in western Washington since then. 2. Cultural Setting The human history of the project area is structured by the draw of its natural resources including forests, bays, and streams. Native American communities that currently comprise the Puyallup and Muckleshoot Tribes have occupied the region for millennia, taking advantage of the resources found here. Euroamerican settlement began with early fur trade by the Hudson's Bay Company. The community of Federal Way became a focus of settlement with the establishment of lumber mills nearby along the shores of Puget Sound. The time depth and intensity of both Native SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project American and Euroamerican settlement in the region is such that evidence of their activities may be present in the project area. The following sections summarize that history. Pre -Contact Culture History The Puget Lowland contains meager evidence of early Holocene human occupation. A small number of isolated fluted projectile points characteristic of the period between 12,000 and 11,000 BP have been found in western Washington, the closest of which was recovered near Renton (Avey [1991]; Meltzer and Dunnell 1987). Recent investigations in Redmond have recovered in situ projectile points in contexts pre -dating 10,000 BP (Kopperl et al. 2010). More common are Olcott sites, named after the type site in Snohomish County near Arlington and found mostly on glacial outwash surfaces in the Puget Lowland and inland foothill valleys (Kidd 1964; Mattson 1985). The distinctive stone tool assemblage consists of large, leaf -shaped and stemmed points and cobble and flake tools manufactured from locally available cobbles. Olcott assemblages are usually interpreted as evidence of an early, highly mobile hunting and gathering adaptation. After about 5000 BP, larger populations organized in more complex ways to exploit a wide range of locally available resources including large and small mammals, shellfish, fish, berries, roots, and bulbs, with an increasing emphasis on salmon overtime. Shell middens containing large quantities of shellfish remains and marine fish and mammal bone are common on the saltwater shoreline. Full-scale development of marine -oriented cultures on the coast and inland hunting, gathering, and riverine fishing traditions as represented in the ethnographic record are apparent after about 2500 BP (Blukis Onat 1987). Large semi -sedentary populations occupied cedar plank houses located at river mouths and confluences and on protected shorelines (Ames and Maschner 1999; Blukis Onat 1987; Fladmark 1982; Matson and Coupland 1995). European contact in the late 18th century led to drastic changes in Native American populations and community structures, primarily caused by disease pandemics, as well as major changes in native economies (Boyd 1999; Campbell 1989). Ethnography and Ethnohistory The project is within the traditional territory of Native communities whose residents relocated to the Muckleshoot and Puyallup reservations after the Medicine Creek Treaty was signed in 1854. The Puyallup, or S'Puyalupubsh in the Lushootseed language, made their homes in villages along the Puyallup River from its mouth to the foothills of Mount Rainier (Puyallup Tribe of Indians 2014; Ruby and Brown 1992). Several different ancestral groups make up the Muckleshoot including the Skopahmish on the upper Green River, the Smulkamish or Smalhkamish from the upper White River and Enumclaw Plateau, the Skekomish or Stkamish on the lower White River, and groups from the upper Puyallup River (Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 2014; Ruby and Brown 1992). Several villages and places important to ancestral groups are in the vicinity of the project and were recorded by ethnographers in the early part of the 20th century. The closest to the project area is Lake Doloff, which was called Blskwa'dis meaning "where there are whales." It was traditionally believed that whales traveled into the lake from the Puget Sound through an underground stream (Waterman 2001). Based on interviews with tribal elders in the 1930s, Marion Smith (1940) identified eleven Puyallup villages. The closest to the project area is sq'wadabc where Simons Creek enters Wapato Creek, about seven miles south of Federal Way SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project High School. A known resource use area is also near Cold Creek in the vicinity of the project area (Brandon Reynon, personal communication 2014). Like most other southern Northwest Coast Salish groups, the Puyallup and Muckleshoot followed a seasonal pattern of settlement that was directly tied to resource availability. In spring people dispersed from central villages to more temporary camps in search of plants, fish, shellfish, and game (Carpenter 1986). Salmon and steelhead trout were caught in Puget Sound and along the banks of the Puyallup, White, and Green Rivers as they migrated to their spawning grounds. Fall - run salmon were smoked or dried for the winter and provided the bulk of the food during that time (Gibbs 1877; Lane 1973; Meeker 1905; Smith 1940). In winter, preserved forms of these foods supported the village while important ceremonial work was completed. Winter was also important for establishing and maintaining social relationships. Heads of households hosted public events marking changes in status like naming, puberty, marriage, or death. These events demonstrated the household's stature: the more important the family, the more guests attended who represented ties of marriage, adoption, trade, and social obligation (Miller 1999:20-21). The arrival of Euroamerican settlers in the late 18th century led to a period of rapid cultural change and demographic shifts in the Native American population (Boyd 1999). Smallpox and other epidemic diseases often affected native populations even before direct contact (Campbell 1989). The introduction of iron tools, non-native foods, and other goods also dramatically changed the economic pursuits of Native Americans. In 1853, Isaac Stevens, the first Governor of Washington Territory and Superintendent of Indian Affairs was given a mandate to remove Native people from their land to open it to non -Native settlement. He did so by signing treaties with tribes and placing them on reservations beginning with the Medicine Creek Treaty of December 1954 (Marino 1990). The Puyallup reservation created by the treaty was 1,280 acres, but was enlarged by executive orders in 1857 and 1873 to 18,062 acres (Ruby and Brown 1992). In addition to Puyallup Indians, the reservation was home to people from other tribes including Nisqually, Cowlitz, White River Green River, and Steilacoom. The government began allotting Indian lands to individual tribal members in the 1880s in an attempt to discourage tribal affiliation and encourage agricultural pursuits. The Medicine Creek Treaty did not create a reservation for tribes from the White and Green River areas. Instead, they were moved to the Nisqually Reservation until a suitable permanent reservation could be established. In 1856, Governor Stevens recommended the creation of a Muckleshoot Reservation on the prairie of the same name (Marino 1990; Ruby and Brown 1992). History The first Euroamerican settlements in the Puget Sound region were associated with the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC) and were established after the War of 1812 to acquire furs for export. In 1833, a small group of British fur traders camped near a Nisqually village at the mouth of Sequilatchew Creek, about 22 miles southwest of the project area. In the following year, they established Fort Nisqually, a fur trading post that became a link between Fort Vancouver on the Columbia River and Fort Langley on the Fraser River (Carpenter 1986). In the late 1830s, the fur trade began to decline rapidly, and the economic focus of the region shifted to agriculture. The HBC was still establishing posts throughout the Puget Sound area in an attempt to retain British sovereignty. For example, around 1840, an HBC cabin was built on the future Pacific Highway South about 2.5 miles north of the project area (Caster 2003). The 49th parallel was established as SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2074 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Wav Hiah School the boundary between the U.S. and Canada in 1846, and British claims to land in the Northwest were eventually relinquished. Beginning in the 1830s, Euroamerican settlers began travelling the Oregon Trail, which ended in the fertile Willamette Valley (Schwantes 1989). As the valley filled with emigrants, settlers moved north into what became Washington Territory. The Indian War of 1855-1856 was rooted in disruptions to Native American lives by Euroamerican immigrants and disease epidemics, but the catalyst for action against Euroamerican settlers was dissatisfaction over the small reservations allotted various tribes. The violence of the war dampened the enthusiasm with which Euroamerican settlers viewed the Puget Sound region, but a small number of settlers returned to the Puyallup and White River valleys after the violence ended. After the Homestead Act was passed in 1862, more settlers came to the region to lay claim to the large parcels of available land. The lush flat prairies of the region, particularly around the White River, were attractive to settlers since they required little clearing and were ideal for pasture. However, land on the upland between Puget Sound and the White River Valley, including the Federal Way area, was not ideal for agriculture, and permanent settlements took longer to become entrenched. The first known permanent settler in the Federal Way area was Ernst Lange, who built a cabin on the beach near Redondo in 1870 (Caster 2003). Land in the project vicinity left federal ownership in the 1880s and 1890s, primarily through Homestead Act claims (Figure 5). Logging was the primary industry in the Federal Way area for much of its early history. Stone's Landing, now Redondo, was initially homesteaded in 1871 by Sam Stone. By the end of the 19th century, one of the first logging settlements on Puget Sound had been established there (Caster 2004). Realizing the potential of the region's timber resources, several other early settlers built small sawmills throughout the Federal Way area, including at Steel Lake in 1890 and at Star Lake in 1909. The Weyerhaeuser Timber Company incorporated in 1900 and purchased between 800,000 and 900,000 acres of land, including part of what was to become Federal Way. Due to the intensive logging practiced in the region, most large -diameter trees had been cut by 1915, but logging continued to be important until about the mid-20th century (Caster 2003). Increased populations in Tacoma and Seattle and the invention of the automobile made road building a priority within and between cities and towns along Puget Sound. In 1915, Highway 99 linking Tacoma and Seattle was constructed by the Army Corps of Engineers. Between 1927 and 1930, the road was paved, making auto travel even easier (Caster 2003). Since the highway, which would later be called Pacific Highway, extended through the Federal Way area, people began opening businesses along the route to take advantage of traveling customers. In 1929, an elementary school was built at the site of the present Federal Way High School to serve five small districts in the area. It was named the Federal Way School due to its proximity to the Federal Highway 99 (Caster 2003). The original 10 acre site was chosen for its relatively easy access by gravel roads and its level topography (Figure 6). The property was later expanded to 40 acres, and several modifications and additions were made to the original building. An addition was constructed in 1934, possibly with WPA labor. In 1938 an annex was built adjacent to the elementary school as a junior and senior high school so that local students would not have to travel to Auburn, Tacoma, or Highline. A separate junior high school building was added to the property in 1943, and in 1948, further additions were made to the elementary school. The high school received a gymnasium and cafeteria addition in 1954. The school district altered the building again in 1963. After determining that remodeling the oldest portion of the original school SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School was not feasible, part of the original elementary school was demolished for construction of facilities for the high school including administrative offices, a student commons, a theater, and a library. Further classrooms and remodeling were completed as part of the 1973-1974 budget (Caster 2008). Today the school is a sprawling building representing at least ten construction and remodeling episodes (Caster 2008). The school was recorded on a Washington State Historic Property Inventory Form in 2008 and recommended not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) (Tingwall et al. 2008a). Only about a third of the original 1929 building remains, and remodeling over the years has significantly altered its original design. Subsequent additions do not retain sufficient integrity to be NRHP-eligible (Tingwall et al. 2008a). 3. Previous Studies Seven cultural resource investigations have been conducted within about a mile of the project area, most of which were for compliance with state and federal laws (Table 1). Three of the assessments were overviews for historic and pre -contact resources in the region (King County 1979; Lewarch and Larson 2003; Wessen and Stilson 1987). Two assessments were for transportation improvements (LAAS 1999; Tingwall et al. 2008a), and one each was for a fiber optic line (Murphy et al. 2000) and a sewer treatment plant (Moura and Kennedy 1981). Table 1. Previous Cultural Resource Investigations Within Approximately One Mile of the Project Area. AUTHOR King County Department of Planning and Community Development Moura and Kennedy DATE PROJECT RELATION TO RESULTS* PROJECT AREA 1979 King County Survey of Historic Places: A Guide to Encompasses Historic buildings Historic Sites in King County 1981 Wessen and Stilson 1987 Larson 1999 Anthropological Archaeological Services Murphy et al. 2000 Lewarch and Larson 2003 Letter Report: Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed Additions to the Redondo Treatment Plant and Investigations of Prehistoric Site 45-KI-3 Resource Protection Planning Process, Southern Puget Sound Study Unit Regional Express/Federal Way and Star Lake Project Cultural Resource Assessment Federal Way Alternative Fiber Optic Line Between Portland and Seattle Cultural Resources Assessment: Clark, Cowlitz, Lewis, Thurston, Pierce and King Counties, Washington, and Multnomah County, Oregon Revised Draft: Historic Context Statement Hunter - Fisher -Gatherer Resources, King County Cultural Resource Protection Project 0.9 mi NW None Encompasses Overview 0.6 mi SE None 0.8 mi E None Encompasses Overview Tingwall et al. 2008 Cultural Resources Report, Pacific Highway South (SR Adjacent Eight historic 99), Phase IV Improvements Project, Federal Way, properties including Washington Federal Way School The closest archaeological site to the project area is 45KI3, a shell midden near Redondo, over 1 mile northwest of the project. Several historical buildings have been recorded in the vicinity of the project, most by the survey associated with improvements to Pacific Highway South (Table 2) (Tingwall et al. 2008a). None of the recorded buildings in the project vicinity is eligible for the NRHP. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 8 Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Wav High School Table 2. Previously Recorded Buildings Near % Mile of the Project Area COMPILERIDATE AGE DESCRIPTION RELATION TO PROJECT AREA Riley 2013 1967 30118 11th PI S, Federal Way To NW Tingwall et al. 2008b 1947 30390 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way To NE Tingwall et al. 2008c 1955 30833 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way To S Clark 2014 1963 805 S 306th, Federal Way To W Tingwall et al. 2008d 1929 Federal Way School Inside Gams 1994; Tingwall et al. 2008e 1930 Garage and Gas Station To E Tingwall et al. 2008f 1945 Knoll's Hardware and Lumber To SE Tingwall et al. 2008g 1957 Lake Village Apartments To S Tingwall et al. 2008h 1954 Medical Office To S Garris and Holstine 1994; Tingwall et al. 2008i 1927 Steel Lake Village To E C. EXPECTATIONS The project area has a moderate to high probability for buried pre -contact cultural resources. The proximity to Steel Lake and the presence of wetlands on the school property indicate that resource procurement would have been a likely activity in the project vicinity. The lake and wetlands would have provided abundant resources for people living in nearby villages or traveling from the Puget Sound shoreline to inland river valleys. Pre -contact archaeological material could include charcoal - stained or burned earth, chipped stone debris, fire modified rock, faunal material, or postholes associated with temporary shelters or drying racks. The highest probability area within the school parcel is near the southwest portion of the project area where historic maps and geotechnical borings suggest that a wetland was once present. Archaeological sites representing short-term camping or hunting/gathering are often found on the margins of historic wetlands. The project area has a low probability for historical archaeological resources. Although the property left federal ownership in the late 19`h century, little historic development occurred on the parcel until the first school was constructed in 1929. Historic archaeological material could include items associated with the initial construction of the school. However, the significant construction and remodeling that has occurred at the school as well as construction along the adjacent Pacific Highway South may have removed or disturbed historical archaeological material that was once present. D. RECOMMENDATIONS The deep fill material over the high -probability southwest portion of the project area prevents the use of standard hand -excavated shovel probes to identify buried archaeological sites. Similarly, much of the remainder of the site is under impervious surface and is not suitable for a shovel probe survey. Given the high potential for buried archaeological material in the southwest portion of the project and the moderate to low probability elsewhere, monitoring during construction by a professional archaeologist is recommended. In the southwest portion of the project where the storm water pond will be constructed and where peat indicates the presence of a historic wetland, project excavations could occur in a staged manner. First, the top seven to 11 feet of fill should be removed to the top of the peat layer, allowing the archaeologist to examine the margins of the peat prior to its removal. The contractor could then remove the peat layer, allowing the archaeologist access again to examine the exposed sediments. If the archaeologist determines that the sediments below the peat are culturally sterile, no additional SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project monitoring of the storm water area would be necessary. Similarly, in areas where fill or asphalt directly overlays glacial sediments, the archaeological monitor should be present for project excavations that intersect native soils. A robust Monitoring and Discovery plan should be developed prior to any ground disturbance. The plan should summarize the background of the project and delineate specific steps that will be taken if any cultural material is encountered during construction. E. ATTACHMENTS 1. Appropriate forms attached for each site? [ ] 2. Maps attached? [X] Yes (Figures 1-6) 3. Photograph attached? [ ] 4. Other attachments? [ ] F. BIBLIOGRAPHY Ames, Kenneth M. and Herbert D. Maschner 1999 Peoples of the Northwest Coast: Their Archaeology and Prehistory. New York, Thames and Hudson. Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 2014 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Federal Way High School Replacement, Federal Way Washington. Submitted to Greene Gasaway Architects, PLLC. Avey, M. [1991] Fluted Point Occurrences in Washington State. Steilacoom, Washington, Ft. Steilacoom Community College. Barnosky, Cathy W. 1984 Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene Environmentla History of Southwestern Washington State, USA. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 21:619-629. Blukis Onat, A. R. 1987 Resource Protection Planning Process: Identification of Prehistoric Archaeological Resources in the Northern Puget Sound Study Unit. Report on file at the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Boyd, Robert T. 1999 The Coming of the Spirit of Pestilence: Introduced Infectious Diseases and Population Decline among Northwest Coast Indians, 1774-1874. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Campbell, Sarah K. 1989 Postcolumbian Culture History in the Northern Columbia Plateau: A.D. 1500-1900. Ph.D. Dissertation: Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 10 Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project Carpenter, Cecelia 1986 Fort Nisqually, A Documented history of Indian and British Interaction. Tahoma Research Service, Tacoma. Caster, Dick 2003 Historical Society of Federal Way Timeline. Historical Society of Federal Way, Washington. 2004 Natural History, Geology and Geography of the Federal Way Area. Historical Society of Federal Way, Washington. 2008 Federal Way Area School History. Historical Society of Federal Way, Washington. Clark, Jeri -Lynn 2014 Historic Property Inventory Form, 805 S 306th, Federal Way. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Fladmark, K. R. 1982 An Introduction to the Prehistory of British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Archaeology(6). Franklin, J. F. and C. T. Dyrness 1973 Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. Frenkel, R. E. and E. F. Heinitz 1987 Composition and Structure of Oregon Ash (Fraxinus latifolia) Forest in William L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon. Northwest Science 61:: 203-212. Garris, M. 1994 Historic Property Inventory Form, Garage and Gas Station. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Garris, M. and Craig Holstine 1994 Historic Property Inventory Form, Steel Lake Village. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Gibbs, George, Dr. Wm. F. Tolmie and Father G. Mengarini 1877 Tribes of Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon. Extract from Volume 1 of "Contributions to American Ethnology", Washington D.C. Hebda, Richard J. 1984 Holocene History of Cedar and Native Indian Cultures of the North American Pacific Coast. Science 225(4663)711-713. Kerwin, John and Tom S. Nelson 2000 Habitat Limiting Factors and Reconnaissance Assessment Report Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watersheds (WRIA 9 and Vashon Island). King County and Washington Conservation Commission. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Kidd, R. S. 1964 A Synthesis of Western Washington Prehistory from the Perspective of Three Occupational Sites. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle. King County Department of Planning and Community Development 1979 King County Survey of Historic Places: A Guide to Historic Sites in King County. King County Department of Planning and Community Development, Seattle, Washington. Kopperl, R. K., C. J. Miss, and C. M. Hodges 2010 Results of Testing at the Bear Creek, Site 45-KI-839, Redmond, King County, Washington. NWAA, Inc., Seattle. Kruckeberg, A. R. 1991 The Natural History of Puget Sound Country. University of Washington Press, Seattle. Lane, B. 1973 Anthropological Report on the Identity and Treaty Status of the Muckleshoot Indians. In Political and Economic Aspects of Indian -White Culture Contact in the mid-19th Century. Manuscript on file, Northwest Archaeological Associates, Seattle. 11 Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services 1999 Regional Express/Federal Way and Star Lake Project Cultural Resource Assessment Federal Way Alternative. Prepared for Sverdrup. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Ltd. Lewarch, Dennis and Lynn Larson 2003 Revised Draft: Historic Context Statement Hunter -Fisher -Gatherer Resources, King County Cultural Resource Protection Project. Prepared for King County Road Services Division. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services, Ltd., Gig Harbor, Washington. Marino, C. 1990 History of Western Washington State Since 1846. In Northwest Coast, edited by W. C. Sturtevant, pp. 169-179. Handbook of North American Indians. vol. 7. Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C. Matson, R. G. and G. Coupland 1995 The Prehistory of the Northwest Coast. Academic Press, San Diego. Mattson, J. L. 1985 Puget Sound Prehistory: Postglacial Adaptations in the Puget Sound with Archaeological Implications for a Solution to the "Cascade Problem". Ann Arbor, Michigan, University Microfilms International. Phd Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Meeker, E. 1905 Pioneer Reminiscences of Puget Sound: The Tragedy of Leschi. Lowman & Hanford Stationary and Printing Co., Seattle, Washington. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION IM Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Meltzer, D. J. and R. C. Dunnell 1987 Fluted Points from the Pacific Northwest. Current Research in the Pleistocene 4:64-67. Miller, J. 1999 Lushootseed Culture and the Shamanic Odyssey, An Anchored Radiance. University of Nebraska Press. Moura, Guy 1981 Washington State Archaeological Site Form, 45KI3. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Moura, Guy and Hal Kennedy 1981 Letter Report: Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed Additions to the Redondo Treatment Plant and Investigations of Prehistoric Site 4541-3. Prepared for Lakehaven Sewer District, Federal Way, Washington. Office of Public Archaeology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe 2014 History of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and its Reservation. Electronic document, http://www.muckleshoot.nsn.uslabQut-usloverview.aspx, accessed July 9, 2014. Murphy, Laura, Denis Lewarch, Leonard Forsman, Michael Madson, David Iversen, Lynn Larson 2000 Fiber Optic Line Between Portland and Seattle Cultural Resources Assessment. Clark, Cowlitz, Lewis, Thurston, Pierce and King Counties, Washington, and Multnomah County, Oregon. Prepared for Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc., Bellevue, Washington. Larson Anthropological Archaeological Services Ltd., Seattle, Washington. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) 2014 Web Soil Survey. Electronic document, htt : websoilsurve .nres.usda. ova WebSoilSurve .as x accessed July 9, 2014. Porter, S. C. and T. W. Swanson 1998 Radiocarbon age constraints on rates of advance and retreat of the Puget lobe of the Cordilleran ice sheet during the last glaciation. Quaternary Research 50: 205-213. Puyallup Tribe of Indians 2014 Historical overview. Electronic document, http://www.puyallup- tribe.com/historvlhistorical overview/ accessed July 8, 2014. Riley, Gregg 2013 Historic Property Inventory Form, 30118 11th PI S, Federal Way. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Ruby, R. H. and J. A. Brown 1992 A Guide to the Indian Tribes of the Pacific Northwest (Revised). University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project Schwantes, Carlos Arnaldo 1989 The Pacific Northwest, An Interpretive History. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln. Smith, M. 1940 The Puyallup-Nisqually. Columbia University Press, New York. Thorson, R. M. 1980 Ice sheet glaciation of the Puget Lowland, Washington, during the Vashon stade (late Pleistocene). Quaternary Research 13: 303-321. 13 1989 Glacio-isostatic response of the Puget Sound area, Washington. Geological Society of America Bulletin 101: 1163-1174. Tingwall, Douglas F., Linda Naoi Goetz, and Kara M. Kanaby 2008a Cultural Resources Report, Pacific Highway South (SR 99), Phase IV Improvements Project, Federal Way, Washington. Prepared for KPG, Inc., Seattle, Washington for Washington State Department of Transportation. Landau Associates, Edmonds, Washington. 2008b Historic Property Inventory Form, 30390 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. 2008c Historic Property Inventory Form, 30833 Pacific Highway South, Federal Way. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. 2008d Historic Property Inventory Form, Federal Way School. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. 2008e Historic Property Inventory Form, Garage and Gas Station. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. 2008f Historic Property Inventory Form, Knoll's Hardware and Lumber. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. 2008g Historic Property Inventory Form, Lake Village Apartments. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. 2008h Historic Property Inventory Form, Medical Office. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. 2008i Historic Property Inventory Form, Steel Lake Village. On file, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Waterman, T. T. 2001 Puget Sound Geography [edited with additional material from Vi Hilbert, Jay Miller, and Zalmai Zahir). Federal Way, Washington, Zahir Consulting Services/Lushootseed Press. Wessen, Gary and M. Leland Stilson 1987 Resource Protection Planning Process, Southern Puget Sound Study Unit. Prepared for the Washington State Department of Community Development. Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia, Washington. Whitlock, Cathy 1992 Vegetational and Climatic History of the Pacific Northwest During the last 20,000 Years: Implications for Understanding Present -Day Biodiversity. Northwest Environmental Journal 8:5- 28. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 14 Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Wav Hiah School Wydoski, Richard S. and Richard R. Whitney 2003 Inland Fishes of Washington, Revised Edition. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project l , WASH94MM QUADRANGLE LOCATION 15 T. 21 Wl Project v, ,,� f .. `, t 1 location r11;0 Y. . n. alo- WAYaI r J 1 ..'1 1-lhr..•�.i VY� E Fi rh rc i -1 �- f� i i . �-- i. R �!01 in 0 : r 0 meteys 500 s* = ! _ 0 feet 2000 EL LISGS Poverty Bay, WA. 7.6 Cluad 1961 hotorevised 1994. Figure 1. Project location. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 16 Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project Playfields d N �v d 0 0. 0 XL 0 20 80 eters feet 0 50 250 77 Project Area Playfield a Proposed � 8�ir<dln9 o_ Figure 2. Project plans showing proposed ground disturbance. 0 SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project lit 2V yr i 1 Ek = Everett Gravelly Sandy Loam (1938); ; r 4W Alderwood (modern) r - ��► Project + - w Parcel i 1 I�I ,. ON,1 az • r x t ei' Md r 4 aP Rr ." Md = Mukilteo Peat (1938); Mukilteo (modern) pe p 7meters.250 4 Sr 0 S 'Feet 1000.. J 193BfSoils Map;, Figure 3. Historic soil map, 1938, showing wetland on the property- 17 SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 18 Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Wav High School Project Figure 4. Air photo showing locations of geotechnical borings. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project 19 �zy 3a,�y 333L 3334 33-JL 32•12 �2-93 3 S.NPRR sm Gr '14 6r 1895 Project Location 7 George Max Machett Matschon H.S. 1889 ` Arthur Steel 'H.S. 1892 tn !a FiIMichNPRR Har1896 C.S.1 & I J August John Barker NPRR 0 meters H S� 1890 urel H.S. 1890 , 165 L 0 feet 2000r'c t it a•rris �s�•y �► -ti ,r �GLO Plat Map, T. 21 N., R. 4 E., 1888 Figure 5 General Land Office map showing project area and land claims.. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 20 Cultural Resources Overview for the Federal Way High School Project ear � • Project At Parcel eters �! r • feet r . 7937 air to for,T._21 E:, Section B. King county raads'services map vault, Figure 6. Historic air photo, 1937, showing project area and elementary school. SWCA Environmental Consultants July 17, 2014 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION b s ehsi�4 EHS-International, Inc. Federal Way High School Arsenic and Lead Investigation W w: Federal Way Public Schools District Federal Way High School 30611 - 16thAvenue South Federal Way, Washington EHSI Project #10527-08 Prepared for: Federal Way Public Schools District c/o Jesse Ahlberg Greene Gasaway Architects 31620 — 23rd Avenue S. #207 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Prepared by: EHS-International, Inc. 13228 NE 20th Street, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005-2049 425.455.2959 July 11th, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................1 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK.......................................................................1 3.0 SITE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN......................................................................1 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING........................................................................1 5.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND RESULTS.....................................................1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................2 7.0 SIGNATURES..............................................................................................2 8.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS...............................................................................2 9.0 REFERENCES...............................................................................................3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Soil Analytical Results................................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Soil Sample Locations APPENDICES A Certified Analytical Report hls ®� EHS-InbmNion.l, Me. 1.0 INTRODUCTION EHS-International, Inc. (EHSI) has prepared this report for the Federal Way Public Schools District (FWPS) to summarize the findings of the Arsenic and Lead in soil investigation conducted at the Federal Way High School (site) located at 30611-161h Ave. S., Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). The purpose of this investigation was to assist FWPS with characterization of soil quality prior to site redevelopment. 2.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK The FWPS is planning on replacing the existing Federal Way High School (FWHS) with a new high school on the same site, which will require the phased demolition of the existing buildings as the new school is constructed. In preparation for that project, FWPS has contracted Greene Gasaway Architects (GGA), to manage the design and construction and SRG Architecture (SRG) to lead the design team. The first phase of the high school replacement project includes installation of new utilities to support the new high school. Based on recent construction projects in the area that have had demonstrated Arsenic and Lead soil contamination resulting from airborne debris from the former Asarco Smelter in Tacoma, Washington, GGA requested EHSI accomplish soil sampling of the areas expected to be impacted by this first phase of construction. 3.0 SITE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN The existing school site is located on a 38.32-acre parcel that includes the Federal Way High School buildings on the east and south sides, parking lots in the center and southwest corner, a practice football field and two baseball fields run along the north side, and the Memorial Stadium is on the west side with a bare grass field around it. This phase of the project will install new utilities to support construction of the new school on the site. The Memorial Stadium is not included in site redevelopment. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The site slopes from east to west and is relatively flat on the east side with a greater slope on the west. The nearest surface water features are Easter Lake located immediately to the south of the site and Steel Lake located approximately 1,700 feet east of the site. A review of surficial geologic information shows the site to be underlain by glacial till, which is typically an unsorted deposit that varies in compaction and composition (Jones 1998). 5.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES AND RESULTS EHSI prepared a sampling and analysis plan (SAP) and the field investigation was conducted on July 3'd, 2014. Soil samples were collected from six (6) different locations which are shown on Figure 2. Nine (9) soil samples were collected and analyzed for Arsenic and Lead using the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 6010B. A summary of the sampling results is presented in Table 1, and the certified analytical report is included in Appendix A. Soil types encountered ranged from silt to sand with gravel in part from ground surface to approximately 1-foot BGS. All Arsenic and Lead concentrations were below detection limits. The data were compared to the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A Cleanup Levels for Unrestricted Land Uses and none of the data were out of compliance. ehs alt Ek5-I niernae� onal. Inc. Table 1— Soil Analytical Results Sample Location Date Sample Depth Arsenic (mg/kg)(b) Lead USCS (mg/kg)(b) j Classification 10527-08-Soil-01 7/3/14 0 to 6 inches <13.0 <13.0 ML 10527-08-Soil-01D 7/3/14 0 to 6 inches <13.0 <13.0 ML 10527-08-Soil-02 7/3/14 6 to 12 inches <13.0 <13.0 ML 10527-08-Soil-03 7/3/14 0 to 6 inches <13.0 <13.0 ML 10527-08-Soil-04 7/3/14 0 to 6 inches <12.0 <12.0 SW 10527-08-Soil-05 7/3/14 0 to 6 inches <13.0 <13.0 ML 10527-08-Soil-06 7/3/14 0 to 6 inches <13.0 <13.0 SM 10527-08-Soil-07 7/3/14 6 to 12 inches <13.0 <13.0 SM 10527-08-Soil-08 7/3/14 0 to 6 inches <13.0 <13.0 SM 10527-08-Rinsate- 09 7/3/14 <20.0 <20.0 MTCA Method A Cleanup Level (a) 20 250 (a) = Model Toxlcs Control Act Method A Cleanup Level for Unrestricted Land Uses, Model Toxics Control Act Statue and Regulation, Nov. 2007 (b) = Certified analytical report Is Included In Appendix A USCS = Unlfled Soil Classification system SM = Silty sand with gravel, SW = Fine to coarse sand; ML = Slit 6.0 CONCLUSIONS The laboratory data show that there was no detectable Arsenic or Lead in the soil samples collected at the site and as a result the soil contamination concentrations were below cleanup levels and document that there is no risk to human health or the environment based on this information. 7.0 SIGNATURES This Arsenic and Lead investigation report was prepared by the undersigned. Rory Peterson Date Geologist"Aft,A Kurt Easthouse Washington Licensed Geologist VAlt A&1 EaNdume 8.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS The conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based upon our visual observations and physical and laboratory testing. This report is intended exclusively for the purpose outlined herein and at the site location and project indicated. This report is for the sole use of our client, the FWPS. �tt�inse.nexw�r�, ix, Opinions and conclusions presented herein apply to site conditions existing at the time of execution of our field investigation and do not necessarily apply to future changes or other prior conditions at the site of which EHSI is not aware and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. The scope of services performed in execution of this field investigation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and any use or re -use of the document or the findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented is at the sole risk of the said user. EHSI's objective is to perform our work with care, exercising the customary thoroughness and competence of environmental consulting professionals in the relevant disciplines. Furthermore, we carried out our services in accordance with the standard for professional services by a consulting firm at the time those services were rendered. It is important to recognize that even the most comprehensive scope of services may fail to detect environmental liability on a particular site. Therefore, EHSI cannot act as insures and cannot "certify or underwrite" that a site is totally free of environmental liability. In addition, no expressed or implied representation or warranty is included or intended in our report except that our work was performed within the limits prescribed by our client, and with the customary thoroughness and competence of our profession. 9.0 REFERENCES Ecology 2007. Model Toxics Control Act Statue and Regulation, WAC 173-340-, November 2007. Jones, M. A., 1998. Geologic Framework for the Puget Sound Aquifer System, Washington and British Columbia, USGS Professional Paper 1424-C. I. miSannmHiond, Ine. Figures ehsi,m.b EH$Afl La-ml ions 1, 1"- Figures kLIN101A 311S so. Z i�lr I V)VMAVM ISM w KN 3 100HOS H91H AVM lVH3a3J ; W LO Z rl > IOIHLSIG 100HOS onond a mo AVM lVb3a3d s o cn ti Vol y ' , Y7.1EA q, O . r � L b4 S'Ab •ral - r/ ��+��AvrS i S'IhAwS \ith Pi`• N IiihPE =lOtFiAveS', �,- �: ,���A+ie�• �' r$ �b4�[ ls�.�'¢.r n Sth N� A�eS uh - ..:�h.. r F OIx = r L S +Si1RARe S" 5hay. L W S "Ave s r I m a M U Ise Alve 5 1: LU w .-vl IL— Wd ?nd dth AveSW^ 6thP2SW �Btl1 McSYiI r+ BdRAreS'VV c� IiAh Ave SVY - • ,,� $ 4tS "J�,�t� U sN 52th Ave SVV-- 7 z R 21st 05 J Cl Cl Z O U) w } 3 m �- a a C/-) LU L!J O cr ri - �0 w � z< rr w KOM 370009 -'338 30VHI C w w M c� A5 d3bd JNIIdWMS a3SOdONd ~ OF-,. VM `A`dM IVN3a3d � o a W a co S 3AV 4W 6 690E ' "N 0.. W �,� 100HOS H91H AVM l`d2i3a3d Z� ` m la aria laaHaS onand Hv io a LL AVM W83a3d Z W CD W J Cnl> LL z 1 ZIOZ H06Pd39 1398Yd 91J031 =d38 30VPVI N D CD Appendix A Certified Analytical Report ehsi4A EHS4at.m.,i... 1. d.e. Appendix A July 7, 2014 Herb Brod EHS International 13228 NE 20th St. Ste. 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Metals Analysis; NVL Batch # 1411363.00 Dear Mr. Brod, INVIL - L A B S INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory I Management I Training Enclosed please find the test results for samples submitted to our laboratory for analysis. Preparation of these samples was conducted following protocol outlined in EPA Method SW 846-3051 unless stated otherwise. Analysis of these samples was performed using analytical instruments in accordance with U.S. EPA, NIOSH, OSHA and other ASTM methods. For matrix materials submitted as paint, dust wipe, soil or TCLP samples, analysis for the presence of total metals is conducted using published U.S. EPA Methods. Paint and soil results are usually expressed in mg/Kg which is equivalent to parts per million (ppm). Lead (Pb) in paint is usually expressed in mg/Kg (ppm) , Percent (%) or mg/cm2 by area. Dust wipe sample results are usually expressed in ug/wipe and uge. TCLP samples are reported in mg/L (ppm). For air filter samples, analyses are conducted using NIOSH and OSHA Methods. Results are expressed in ug/filter and ug/m3. Other matrix materials are analyzed accordingly using published methods or specified by client. The reported test results pertain only to items tested. Lead test results are not blank corrected. For recent regulation updates pertaining to current regulatory levels or permissible exposure levels, please call your local regulatory agencies for more details. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. if you need further assistance please feel free to call us at 206-547-0100 or 1-888-NVLLABS. Sincerely, Nick Ly, Technical Director Enclosure: Jr / AINA LAP, LI.0 ACCOMLABQRATDRI' NVL Laboratories, Inc, 1.888.NVL.LABS ++Nnwx r�� tl0k` 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 1.838.(685.5227) �� ti a www.nvllabs.com ��"�"I"1'�� LAH44fffA6S p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 NVL Laboratories Inc, 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel:206.547.0100, Fax:206.634.1936 www.nvilabs.com Client: EHS International Address: 13228 NE 20th St. Ste. 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention: Mr. Herb Brod Project Location: Federal Way High School =AMORATOPry AI HA - IH # 101861Analysis Deport WA-DOE#C1765 Total Metals Batch #: 1411363.00 Matrix: Soil Method: EPA 6010 Client Project #: 10527-08 Date Received: 7/3/2014 Samples Received: 9 Samples Analyzed: 9 Sample RL Results in Results in Lab ID Client Sample # Elements wt (g) mg / kg mg I kg ppm 14070750 10527-08-soil-01 Arsenic (As) 0.3120 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3120 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 14070751 10527-08-Soil-01D Arsenic (As) 0.3136 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3136 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 R 14070752 10527-08-soil-02 Arsenic (As) 0.3070 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3070 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 14070753 10527-08-soil-03 Arsenic (As) 0.3072 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3072 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 14070754 10527-08-Soil-04 Arsenic (As) 0.3242 12.0 < 12.0 < 12.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3242 12.0 < 12.0 < 12.0 14070755 10527-08-soil-05 Arsenic (As) 0.3016 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3016 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 14070756 10527-08-Soil-06 Arsenic (As) 0,3188 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3188 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 14070757 10527-08-Soil-07 Arsenic (As) 0.3182 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3182 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 14070758 10527-08-soil-08 Arsenic (As) 0.3068 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Lead (Pb) 0.3068 13.0 < 13.0 < 13.0 Sampled by: Client f Analyzed by: Fatima Khan Date Analyzed: 07/07/2014 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date Issued: 07/07/2014 N ^ _ it 40 mg/ kg = Milligrams per kilogram RL = Reporting Limit ppm = Parts per million '<' = Below the reporting Limit Note: Method QC results are acceptable unless stated otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt. Bench Run No: 34-0707-4 Page 1 of 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. CHAIN of CUSTODY 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Emerg.Pager:206.344.1878 SAMPLE LOG Fax: 206.634.1936 1.888.NVL.LABS (685.5227) Client EHS International, Inc. Street 13228 NE 20th Street Suite 11 Bellevue, WA 98005-2049 Project Managergrb -Q Project Location Lo0. s — Phone.425-455-2959 Fax: 425-646-7247 NVL Batch ID 1411363 NVL Batch Number 'Client Job Number — Total Samples — - Turn Around Time ❑ 1-Hr i 24-Hrs ❑ 4 Days ❑ 2-Hrs O 2 Days ❑ 5 Days ❑ 4-Hrs 113 Days ❑ 6 to 10 Days Please call for TAT less than 24 His Email address bekbln @ehsintl.com Asbestos Air ❑ PCM (NIOSH 7400) ❑ TEM (NIOSH 7402) ❑ TEM ❑ Asbestos Bulk I ❑ PLM (EPA/6001R4W116) ❑ PLM (EPA Point Couni ❑ MoldlFu_ ngus ❑ Mold Air ❑ Mold Bulk ElRotometer Calibration METALS Inst./Det Limid Matrix t Total Metals ❑ FAA (ppm) ❑ Air Filter ❑ Paint Chips in i ❑ TCLP a ICP (ppm) ❑ Drinking water IN Waste Water ❑ GFAA (ppb) Dust/wipe (Area) ❑ Other ❑ Paint Chips in % HERA) ❑ TEM ❑ PLM (EPA G Level II) LJ Other ❑ TEM Bulk RCRA Metals 1I AIL$ -r- ■ Arsenic (As) ❑ Mercury (Hg) '-— ❑ Barium (Ba) J Selenium (Se) '7- Copper (Cu) ❑ Cadmium (Cd) ❑ Silver (Ag) El Zinc ickel (Ni) ❑ Chromium (Cr) Lead (Pb) ❑ Other Types of Analysis ❑ Fiberglass ❑ Nuisance Dust ❑ Other (Specify) ❑ Silica ❑ Respirable Dust Condition of Package: ❑ Good ❑ Damaged (no spillage) ❑ Severe damage (spillage) Seq. #1 Lab ID , Client Sample Number Comments (e.g Sample area, Sample Volume, "Glck Reidy O -E 1 lvsI7-Oe- So.l- 01 1V6A 15A 2 3 loS 27-o"01- Awl -0 4 08-Sod-o3ytw?'+ 1� i a s, J_ 5 ?toS2_7-00-Seit'C� 6 l Loi��27-as-1:o;r—cam-.. _ ty F� 7 f ; IffV7-o>a-5o,' o a� �Foc(` m 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 EHSI Ac) AIR N fZ 6-6 re Received by �_ _.k Analyzed by Results Called by Results Faxed by Special Instructions: Unless requested in writing, all samples will be disposed of two (2) weeks after analysis. Please e-mail results. NVL_ Labora_tories,, In_c. CHAIN of CUSTODY 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Emerg.Pager: 206.344.1878 SAMPLE LOG Fax: 206.634.1936 1.888.NVL.LABS (685.5227) Client EHS International, Inc. Street 13228 NE 20th Street Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005-2049 Project Manager Etb Project Location ���-qQ WQ .sc _ NVL Batch ID 1411363 NVL Batch Number -- - Client Job Number ) 0 2E Total Samples 10 Turn Around Time ❑ 1-Hr ■ 244grs ❑ 4 Days 2-Hrs ❑ 2 Days ❑ 5 Days ❑ 4-Hrs ❑ 3 Days ❑ 6 to 10 Days call for TAT less than 24 Hrs Email address he pip @ehsintl . COm Phone:425-455-2959 Fax: 425-646-7247 ❑ Asbestos Air ❑ PCM (N1OSH 7400) ❑ TEM (NIOSH 7402) ❑ TEM (AHERA) ❑ Asbestos Bulk ❑ PLM (EPAl600IR 93/116) ❑ PLM (EPA Point Count) ❑ PLM [.J MoldlFungus ❑ Mold Air ❑ Mold Bulk ❑ Rotometer Calibration_ RA Metals __11All.8._ . ❑ FAA (ppm) ❑ Air Filter ❑ Paint Chips in cm !] Arsenic (As) ❑ Mercury (Hg) S ICP (ppm) ❑ Drinking water itWaste Water [I Barium (Ba) ❑ Selenium (Se) ❑ GFAA (ppb) ❑ Dustlwipe (Area) ❑ Other ❑ Cadmium (Cd) ❑ Silver (Ag) ■ Soil ❑ Chromium (Cr) ❑ Paint Chips in % ■ Lead (Pb) ❑ Fiberglass ❑ Nuisance Dust ❑ Other (Specify) ❑ Silica ❑ Respirable Dust r� n_..A n.......,,.-A r— � ni.,.-i n Cavara rlamanP (snillaaal ■ Total Metals ❑ TCLP ❑ Other Types of Analysis ❑ TEM (EPA Level II) ❑ Other [EPA Gravimetry) ❑ TEM Bulk Copper(Cu) Nickel (Ni) Zinc (Zn) Seq. # Client Sample Number comments (e.g Sample area, Sample Volume, etc) AIR 1 2 �ID T° 10s27-oe- soil- 01 los 21os - 5°�!- 1 D -0 u 'track o - 5Q,'i 041 " � P Y3 rn�f�—"'� r 4 5 r—U o$-SE)J 6 Se. � 46 a� dad` (�a �i — 0 - ►! "{ --JAQ /r Ar► r' /r D - n r 7 8 9 10 L0527 _ag 1o527 - 0$' ��� 11 12 13 14 15 E_ Sampled Received EHSI oV'11141 EHS I r� Results Called by Results Faxed by - -- Special Instructions: Unless requested in writing, all samples will be disposed of two (2) weeks after analysis. Please e-mail results. Julv 7. 2014 Herb Brod EHS International 13228 NE 20th St. Ste. 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Metals Analysis; NVL Batch # 1411364.00 Dear Mr. Brod, INVIL., L A B S INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E SERVICES Laboratory I Management I Training Enclosed please find the test results for samples submitted to our laboratory for analysis. Preparation of these samples was conducted following protocol outlined in EPA Method SW 846-3051 unless stated otherwise. Analysis of these samples was performed using analytical instruments in accordance with U.S. EPA, NIOSH, OSHA and other ASTM methods. For matrix materials submitted as paint, dust wipe, soil or TCLP samples, analysis for the presence of total metals is conducted using published U.S. EPA Methods. Paint and soil results are usually expressed in mg/Kg which is equivalent to parts per million (ppm). Lead (Pb) in paint is usually expressed in mg/Kg (ppm) , Percent (%) or mg/cm' by area. Dust wipe sample results are usually expressed in ug/wipe and ug/ftz. TCLP samples are reported in mg/L (ppm). For air filter samples, analyses are conducted using NIOSH and OSHA Methods. Results are expressed in ug/filter and ug/m3. Other matrix materials are analyzed accordingly using published methods or specified by client. The reported test results pertain only to items tested. Lead test results are not blank corrected. For recent regulation updates pertaining to current regulatory levels or permissible exposure levels, please call your local regulatory agencies for more details. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. if you need further assistance please feel free to call us at 206-547-0100 or 1-888-NVLLABS. Sincerely, .6Q Nick Ly, Technical Director Enclosure: " ���J�OP, fI<ALAP, IIC lC OnMLkWT0Rr NVL Laboratories, Inc. 1.888.NVL.LABS �% �+ 1.889.(635.5227j� w 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 www.nvllabs.com �'•`I"I"ti'L—=— p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 NVL Laboratories. -Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 96103 Tel:206.547.0100, Fax:206.634.1936 www.nvilabs.com Client: EHS International Address: 13228 NE 20th St. Ste. 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention: Mr. Herb Brod Project Location: Federal Way High School D AIHA - IH # 101861 :ACC:Nff0:1T]2DAnalysis Report WA-DOE#C1765 Total Metals Batch #: 1411364.00 Matrix: Waste Water Method EPA 200.7 Client Proiect #: 10527-08 Date Received: 7/3/2014 Samples Received: 1 Samples Analvzed: 1 RL in Results in Results in Lab ID Client Sample # Elements mg / L mg / L ppm 14070759 10527-06-Rinsate-09 Arsenic (As) 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 Lead (Pb) 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.20 Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Fatima Khan Reviewed by: Nick Lv Date Analyzed: 07/07/2014 Date Issued: 07/07/2014 mg/ L = Milligrams per liter RL = Reporting Limit N/A = Not Applicable '<' = Below the reporting Limit Note : Method QC results are acceptable unless stated otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt. Page 1 of 1 Bench Run No: 34-0707-03 NVL Laboratories, Inc. NVL Batch ID 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 CHAIN of CUSTODY Tel: 206.547.0100 Emerg.Pager. 206.344.1878 SAMPLE LOG1411364. > Fax: 206.634.1936 1.888.NVL.LABS (685.5227) Client EHS International, Inc._ Street 13228 NE 20th Street Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005-2049 Project Manager _ ek Project Location WA NVL Batch Number Client Job Number Total Samples - Turn Around Time ❑ 1-Hr ■ 24-Hrs ❑ 4 Days ❑ 2-Hrs ❑ 2 Days ❑ 5 Days ❑ 4-Hrs ❑ 3 Days ❑ 6 to 10 Days Please call for TAT less than 24 Hrs Email address J2etbb- @ehsintl.com Phone: 425-455-2959 Fax: 425-646-7247 ❑ Asbestos Air ❑ PCM (NIOSH 7400) ❑ TEM (NIOSH 7402) ❑ TEM (AHERA) ❑ TEM (EPA Level 11) ❑ Other ❑ Asbestos Bulk I ❑ PLM (EPA/600/R-93/116) ❑ PLM (EPA Point Count) ❑ PLM (EPA Gravimetryy ❑TEM Bulk ❑ Mold/Fungus ❑ Mold Air ❑ Mold Bulk ❑ Rotometer Callbration _ - METALS Inst lDet LimlFi Matrix RCRA Metals I AI! g 0 Total Metals ❑ FAA (ppm) ❑ Air m elt r Paint Chips ip cmi IN Arsenic (As) 0 Mercury (Hg) n Copper Cu) ❑ TCLP 1p ICP (ppm) ❑ Drinking water It Waste Water El Barium (Be) El Selenium (Se) ❑ Nicke ❑ GFAA (ppb) ❑ Dust/wipe (Area) El Other l Other 1 ; Cadmium (Cd) Silver (Ag) El Zinc (Ni)(N ■ Soil ❑ Chromium (Cr) ❑ Paint Chips in % ■ Lead (Pb) ❑ Other Types7[T-Fiberglass ❑ Nuisance Dust ❑ Other (Specify) of Analysis ❑ Silica ❑ Respirable Dust -_. n r-., A I-1 rlmmnnarl Inn cnHinnAl f-1 Severe damaae (soillaael Lab ID Client Sample Number Comments (eg Sample area, Sample Volume, etc) AlR10517-Ug- Svii- 01k rlc� FSeq. los27.08-Soy'l-Q I D to927-0o"-Soyl-O�p7L (� fro. ice! — �,�r 4 IDEA? -o8-lcbd-D3 ,r � TA.,te P11-0 41,c4e 5 1p5-Z?-00—Sj�-o� 6 0-0 7 I05-27.-09-6 8 sxi -o - Al 9 _p f I.� 7 '! -�- - /r /r // r // — 10 11 12�F 13 _ 14 15 Sampled by & EHSI f Relinquished by - EHSI Receive by. y. 6� � Results Called by'I Results Faxed by Special Instructions: Unless requested in writing, all samples will be disposed of two (2) weeks after analysis. Please e-mail results. rA Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 1i [i] V i�] pi5 Serving tke Pacific Northwest Since ig8i March 10, 2014 Project No. KE120504A Greene Gasaway Architects, PLLC . P.Q. Box 4158 Federal Way Washington 98063 Attention: Mr. Jeff Greene Subject: Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way High School Replacement 30611 16' Avenue South Federal Way, Washington Dear Mr. Greene: We are pleased to present these copies of our report for the referenced project. This report summarizes the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazards, and geotechnical engineering studies, and offers recommendations for the design and development of the proposed project. Our report is preliminary since project plans were under development at the time this report was written. We should be allowed to review the recommendations presented in this report and modify them, if needed, once final project plans have been formulated. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that the recommendations presented in this report will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions, or if we can be of additional help to you, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington RESUBMIT-TED Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. MAR 19 2014 Senior Principal Engineer CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS KDM/pc KE120504A3 Projects\201205MYO W P Kirkland Everett Tacoma 425-827-7.701 425-259-0522 253-722-2992 www.aesgeo.com GeotechnicaCEngbwering Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Serving the Pacific .Northwest Since 1g81 WL -Water Resources Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report r FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT Federal Way, Washington Y i 1. Env ironmentaC-Assessments and R.emecdiation SustainabCe DeveComent Services Geologic -Assessments Prepared for Greene Gasaway Architects, PLLC Project No. KE120504A March 10, 2014 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARDS, AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT Federal Way, Washington Prepared for: Greene Gasaway Architects, PLLC P.O. Box 4158 Federal Way Washington 98063 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 911 5'h Avenue Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 Fax: 425-827-5424 March 10, 2014 Project No. KE120504A Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washin ton Project and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report -presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazards, and geotechnical engineering studies for the proposed replacement for Federal Way High School. The site location is shown on the "Vicinity Map," Figure 1. The approximate locations of the exploration borings completed for this study are shown on the "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. Logs of the subsurface explorations completed for this study are included in the Appendix. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide geotechnical engineering design recommendations to be utilized in the design of the project. This study included a review of selected available geologic literature, advancing 10 hollow -stem auger soil borings, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow ground water. Geotechnical engineering studies were completed to establish recommendations for the type of suitable foundations, allowable foundation soil bearing pressure, anticipated foundation settlement, erosion control, and drainage considerations. This report summarizes our fieldwork and offers recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. We recommend that we be allowed to review the recommendations presented in this report and revise them, if needed, when a project design has been finalized. 1.2 Authorization Written authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Federal Way Public Schools via Purchase Order No. 14401083. Our study was accomplished in general accordance with our scope of work letter dated December 4, 2013. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Federal Way Public Schools, Greene Gasaway Architects, PLLC, and their agents, for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. Our observations, findings, and opinions are a means to identify and reduce the inherent risks to the owner. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - M20504A3 - Projects 120I205041KEIWP Page 1 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Fro sect and Site Conditions 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is the existing Federal Way High School, located within the northeast quarter of Section 8, Township 21 North, Range 4 East, W.M. within the City of Federal Way, Washington, King County Parcel Number 082104-9001. The site is rectangular in shape and the parcel area is about 38.3 acres. The southeast quarter of the parcel is developed with school buildings. The majority of the remaining site area is developed with fields and parking areas. The Federal Way Memorial Stadium is located in the center of the western half of the site. The site is bordered by Pacific Highway South and 6' Avenue South on the east, by South 304' Street on the north, by single-family residential homes on the west, and by South 308' Street on the south. Based on a review of King County Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) mapping, the site topography slopes downward from the northeast corner of the site at about elevation 490 feet to the west-southwest with about 50 feet of elevation change. The lowest portion of the site is the southwest comer of the site at about elevation 440 feet. We understand the overall project goal is to replace the existing facility with a new school. The new school would be located in the approximate same location as the existing buildings. The remainder of the site would be graded for parking, athletic field, and storm water management ponds as depicted on the site layout plan dated November 20, 2013, shown as the base map for our "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. We have been requested to provide design phase geotechnical recommendations for the proposed replacement school. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our subsurface exploration completed for this project included advancing 10 hollow -stem auger soil borings. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the explorations completed for this study. The locations and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budget constraints. 3.1 Exploration Borings The exploration borings were completed by advancing hollow -stem auger tools with a track -mounted drill rig. During the drilling process, samples were obtained at generally 2.5- to 5-foot-depth intervals. The exploration borings were continuously observed and logged by a representative from our firm. The exploration logs presented in the Appendix are based on the field logs, drilling action, and inspection of the samples secured. Disturbed but representative samples were obtained by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):D 1586. This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard, 2-inch March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects 1201205041KEI WP Page 2 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Proiect and Site Conditions outside -diameter, split -barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140-pound hammer free -falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6-inch interval is recorded, and the number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the Standard Penetration Resistance ("N") or blow count. If a total of 50 is recorded within one 6-inch interval, the blow count is recorded as the number of blows for the corresponding number of inches of penetration. The resistance, or N-value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils; these values are plotted on the attached exploration boring logs. The samples obtained from the split -barrel sampler were classified in the field and representative portions placed in watertight containers. The samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of selected applicable geologic literature. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, interpolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. 4.1 Strati ra h Fill Fill soils (soils not naturally placed) were encountered at the locations of exploration borings EB-2, EB-9, and EB-10 to depths ranging from 3.5 to 11 feet below the ground surface. This fill generally consisted of loose to medium dense silty sand with gravel. Portions of the fill contained organic material. We interpret the encountered fill as likely resulting from past grading activities, including the filling of low areas at the western portion of the subject site. Fill thicknesses can vary over short distances and may be deeper than observed in our explorations. Due to their variable density and content, the existing fill soils are not suitable for foundation support. Vashon Lodgement Till Sediments encountered at the locations of exploration boring EB-1, as well as below the fill at EB-2, generally consisted of very dense, silty sand with gravel. We interpret these sediments to likely be representative of Vashon lodgement till (Qvt). The Qvt was deposited directly from basal, debris -laden glacial ice during the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects 120120504"1 WP Page 3 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Wav, Washington Protect and Site Conditions approximately 12,500 to 15,000 years ago. The high relative density of the unweathered till is due to its consolidation by the massive weight of the glacial ice from which it was deposited. Pre -Fraser Deposits At exploration borings EB-3 through EB-8, and underlying the fill at exploration borings EB-9 and EB-10, our exploration borings encountered medium dense to very dense silty fine to medium sand, with gravel, siltier zones, silt beds, and trace organics, which extended below the maximum depths explored. This deposit was interpreted to represent sediments placed prior to the Fraser Glaciation and subsequently compacted by the weight of the overlying glacial ice. The reduced density observed within 3 to 5 feet of the ground surface is interpreted to be due to weathering. The medium dense to very dense material is generally considered suitable for support of light to heavily loaded foundations when in an intact, undisturbed condition. This material is moisture -sensitive and susceptible to disturbance when wet. 4.2 Geologic Mapping Review of the Geologic Map of the Poverty Bay 7.5-minute Quadrangle, King and Pierce Counties, Washington, (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS] Miscellaneous Scientific Investigations Map 2854, scale 1:24,000 [D.B. Booth, H.H. Waldron, and K.G. Troost, 2004]) indicates that the area of the subject site is underlain by Vashon lodgement till. Our interpretation of the sediments encountered at the subject site is in general agreement with the mapped units on the regional geologic map. We also observed older, pre -Fraser -age sediments in our explorations. 4.3 Hydrology We encountered ground water seepage in exploration borings EB-9 and EB-10 at depths of 10 and 14 feet, respectively, below the ground surface. We anticipate that the encountered ground water likely represents a local ground water table within the underlying pre -Fraser deposits. We expect that shallow ground water seepage would likely represent interflow within the existing fill. Interflow occurs when surface water percolates down through the surficial weathered or higher -permeability sediments and becomes perched atop underlying, lower -permeability sediments. It should be noted that the occurrence and level of ground water seepage at the site may vary in response to such factors as changes in season, precipitation, and site use. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects12012050,AMWP Page 4 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions 4.4 Laboratory Test Results Grain size analysis tests were completed on three samples selected from the exploration borings. Also, the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of three soil samples were determined using the modified Proctor test procedure (ASTM:D 1557) Moisture content testing on each sample taken during drilling was measured to allow comparison of in situ moisture to the optimum moisture. The results of this comparison are summarized in Table 1. Laboratory test results are included in the Appendix. Table 1 Material Maximum Dry Density (pcf)(1) Optimum Moisture Content (percent) Average In -situ Moisture Content ercent) Range of In -situ Moisture Contents (percent) "Gray till" 142.0 4.0 9.8 2.7 - 24.0 "Weathered till" 117.5 9.0 19.1 6.6 - 40.0 Fill 112.2 16.4 21.2 14.4 - 26.9 per = pOunnas per cuU1c rooT. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Prgjects12012O5O4iMWP Page 5 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal W , Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations U. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and ground and surface water conditions, as observed and discussed herein. The discussion will be limited to slope stability, seismic, and erosion issues. The site does not contain subsurface and slope conditions that are likely to trigger City of Federal Way critical areas regulations related to slopes or seismic hazards. The City does not specifically designate erosion hazard areas; however, later sections of this report discuss erosion control to satisfy Washington State requirements for construction site management. The native sediments on -site are not expected to have significant liquefaction potential, and a quantitative liquefaction analysis was not warranted in our opinion or completed. 5.0 SLOPE HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The site does not appear to contain slopes that constitute a slope stability hazard, in our opinion, and does not contain slopes that meet the definition for Geologically Hazardous Areas in accordance with Federal Way Municipal Code (FWMC) Section 14.30. No quantitative slope stability analysis was completed for this study, and none is warranted for the currently proposed project, in our opinion. 6.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion is a general assessment of seismic hazards that is intended to be useful to the owner in terms of understanding seismic issues, and to the structural engineer for preliminary structural design. Earthquakes occur regularly in the Puget Lowland. The majority of these events are small and are usually not felt by people. However, large earthquakes do occur, as evidenced by the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event; the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; and the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within a given 20-year period. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture, 2) seismically induced landslides, 3) liquefaction, and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects1201205041KEMP Page 6 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations 6.1 Surficial Ground Rupture Generally, the largest earthquakes that have occurred in the Puget Sound area are sub -crustal events with epicenters ranging from 50 to 70 kilometers in depth. Earthquakes that are generated at such depths usually do not result in fault rupture at the ground surface. However current research indicates that surficial ground rupture is possible in the Seattle and Tacoma Fault Zones. The Seattle and Tacoma Fault Zones are areas of active research. Our current understanding of these fault zones is poor, and actively evolving. The site is located south of the currently mapped limits of the Seattle Fault Zone. Preliminary maps of the Tacoma Fault zone depict possible fault splays mapped west of the site and projecting generally toward the site area, but mapped fault splays fall short of the project site. If the currently mapped fault splays are projected, the nearest fault splay projects approximately 1 mile north of the subject site. Due to the fact that the site is not in close proximity to known or projected fault splays, the risk of damage to the project as a result of surficial ground rupture is low, in our opinion. 6.2 Seismically Induced Landslides The site does not contain steep slopes, and does not appear to have significant risk of seismically induced landslides, in our opinion. We did not complete a quantitative slope stability analysis as part of this study, and none is warranted for the currently proposed project, in our opinion. 6.3 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a process through which unconsolidated soil loses strength as a result of vibrations, such as those which occur during a seismic event. During normal conditions, the weight of the soil is supported by both grain -to -grain contacts and by the fluid pressure within the pore spaces of the soil below the water table. Extreme vibratory shaking can disrupt the grain -to -grain contact, increase the pore pressure, and result in a temporary decrease in soil shear strength. The soil is said to be liquefied when nearly all of the weight of the soil is supported by pore pressure alone. Liquefaction can result in deformation of the sediment and settlement of overlying structures. Areas most susceptible to liquefaction include those areas underlain by non -cohesive silt and sand with low relative densities, accompanied by a shallow water table. The site is underlain by dense, silty, unsaturated sediments that are not considered to be at risk of liquefaction in our opinion. A quantitative liquefaction analysis was not completed as part of this study and is not warranted in our opinion. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects 1201205041KEI WP Page 7 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations 6.4 Ground Motion Structural design of buildings should follow 2012 International Building Code (IBC) standards using Site Class "C" in accordance with table 1613.5.2. 7.0 EROSION HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The FWMC Section 14.30 does not specifically define erosion hazard areas. The following discussion addresses Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) erosion control regulations that will be applicable to the project. In our opinion, implementation of the following recommendations should be adequate to address City of Federal Way requirements. As of October 1, 2008, the Ecology Construction Storm Water General Permit (also known as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] permit) requires weekly Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) inspections, turbidity monitoring and pH monitoring for all sites 1 or more acres in size that discharge storm water to surface waters of the state. Because we anticipate that the proposed project will require disturbance of more than 1 acre, we anticipate that these inspection and reporting requirements will be triggered. The following recommendations are related to general erosion potential and mitigation. The erosion potential of the site soils is significant when the soils are exposed. The most effective erosion control measure is the maintenance of adequate ground cover. Maintaining cover measures atop disturbed ground provides the greatest reduction to the potential generation of turbid runoff and sediment transport. During the local wet season (October ? through March 315), exposed soil should not remain uncovered for more than 2 days unless it is actively being worked. Ground -cover measures can include erosion control matting, plastic sheeting, straw mulch, crushed rock or recycled concrete, or mature hydroseed. Some fine-grained surface soils are the result of natural weathering processes that have broken down parent materials into their mineral components. These mineral components can have an inherent electrical charge. Electrically charged mineral fines will attract oppositely charged particles and can combine (flocculate) to form larger particles that will settle out of suspension. The sediments produced during the recent glaciation of Puget Sound are, however, most commonly the suspended soils that are carried by site storm water. The fine-grained fraction of the glacially derived soil is referred to as "rock flour," which is primarily a silt -sized particle with no electrical charge. These particles, once suspended in water, may have settling times in periods of weeks or months. Therefore, the flow length within a temporary sediment control trap or pond has virtually no effect on the water quality of the discharge, since it will not settle out of suspension in the time March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects 1201205041KEI WP Page 8 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations it takes to flow from one end of the pond to the other. Reduction of turbidity from a construction site is almost entirely a function of cover measures and flow control. Temporary sediment traps and ponds are necessary to control the release rate of the runoff and to provide a catchment for sand -sized and larger soil particles, but are very ineffective at reducing the turbidity of the runoff. To mitigate the erosion hazards and potential for off -site sediment transport, we recommend the following: 1. The winter performance of a site is dependent on a well -conceived plan for control of site erosion and storm water runoff. It is easier to keep the soil on the ground than to remove it from storm water. The owner and the design team should include adequate ground -cover measures, access roads, and staging areas in the project bid to give the selected contractor a workable site. The selected contractor needs to be prepared to implement and maintain the required measures to reduce the amount of exposed ground. A site maintenance plan should be in place in the event storm water turbidity measurements are greater than the Ecology standards. 2. All TESC measures for a given area to be graded or otherwise worked should be installed prior to any activity within that area. The recommended sequence of construction within a given area would be to install sediment traps and/or ponds and establish perimeter flow control prior to starting mass grading. 3. During the wetter months of the year, or when large storm events are predicted during the summer months, each work area should be stabilized so that if showers occur, the work area can receive the rainfall without excessive erosion or sediment transport. The required measures for an area to be "buttoned -up" will depend on the time of year and the duration the area will be left un-worked. During the winter months, areas that are to be left un-worked for more than 2 days should be mulched or covered with plastic. During the summer months, stabilization will usually consist of seal -rolling the subgrade. Such measures will aid in the contractor's ability to get back into a work area after a storm event. The stabilization process also includes establishing temporary storm water conveyance channels through work areas to route runoff to the approved treatment facilities. 4. All disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. If it is outside of the growing season, the disturbed areas should be covered with mulch, as recommended in the erosion control plan. Straw mulch provides the most cost-effective cover measure and can be made wind -resistant with the application of a tackifier after it is placed. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - KE120504A3 - Projects 1201205041KEIWP Page 9 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal EL , Washin ton Geologic Hazards and Miti ations 5. Surface runoff and discharge should be controlled during and following development. Uncontrolled discharge may promote erosion and sediment transport. Under no circumstances should concentrated discharges be allowed to flow over significant slopes. 6. Soils that are to be reused around the site should be stored in such a manner as to reduce erosion from the stockpile. Protective measures may include, but are not limited to, covering with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, or the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. During the period between October 1" and March 3I't, these measures are required. 7. On -site erosion control inspections and turbidity monitoring should be performed in accordance with Ecology requirements. Weekly and monthly reporting to Ecology should be performed on a regularly scheduled basis. TESC monitoring should be part of the weekly construction team meetings. Temporary and permanent erosion control and drainage measures should be adjusted and maintained, as necessary, at the time of construction. It is our opinion that with the proper implementation of the TESC plans and by field -adjusting appropriate mitigation elements (best management practices [BMPs]) during construction, as recommended by the erosion control inspector, the potential adverse impacts from erosion hazards on the project may be mitigated. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - KE120504A3 - Projects1201205041KE1WP Page 10 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations M. DESIGN RECOMAMNDATIONS 8.0 INTRODUCTION Our exploration indicates that, from a geotechnical standpoint, the parcel is suitable for the proposed improvements provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. The subject site is underlain'in places by a layer of existing fill, loose, or weathered soil that is variable in thickness and density. Existing fill or loose soils are not suitable for support of new foundations, and warrant remedial preparation where occurring below paving and similar lightly loaded structures. Structural fill or at least medium dense native deposits are suitable for support of shallow foundations with proper preparation. 9.0 SITE PREPARATION Existing buried utilities, vegetation, topsoil, and any other deleterious materials should be removed where they are located below planned construction areas. All disturbed soils should be removed to expose underlying, undisturbed, native sediments and replaced with structural fill, as needed. All excavations below final grade made for clearing and grubbing activities should be back filled, as needed, with structural fill. Erosion and surface water control should be established around the clearing limits to satisfy local requirements. Once clearing and grubbing activities have been completed, existing fill, where encountered, should be addressed. We recommend that existing fill be removed from below areas of planned foundations to expose underlying, undisturbed native sediments, followed by restoration of the planned foundation grade with structural fill. Removal of existing fill should extend laterally beyond the building footprint by a distance equal to the depth of overexcavation. For example, if existing fill is removed to a depth of 2 feet below a planned footing area, the excavation should also extend laterally 2 feet beyond the building footprint in that area. Care should be taken not to disturb support soils of existing foundations. Support soils should be considered those soils within a prism projected downward and outward from existing footings at inclinations of 1H:1V (Horizontal: Vertical). Where existing fill is removed and replaced with structural fill, conventional shallow foundations may be used for building support. The required depth of removal should be determined in the field based on actual conditions encountered during excavation. 9.1 Site Drainage and Surface Water Control The site should be graded to prevent water from ponding in construction areas and/or flowing into excavations. Exposed grades should be crowned, sloped, and smooth drum -rolled at the March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — M20504A3 — Projects120120504WE1 WP Page 11 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washin ton Design Recommendations end of each day to facilitate drainage. Accumulated water must be removed from subgrades and work areas immediately prior to performing further work in the area. Equipment access may be limited, and the amount of soil rendered unfit for use as structural flll may be greatly increased if drainage efforts are not accomplished in a timely sequence. If an effective drainage system is not utilized, project delays and increased costs could be incurred due to the greater quantities of wet and unsuitable fill, or poor access and unstable conditions. We anticipate that perched ground water could be encountered in excavations completed during construction. We do not anticipate the need for extensive dewatering in advance of excavations. The contractor should be prepared to intercept any ground water seepage entering the excavations and route it to a suitable discharge location. Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the buildings at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or to collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend that a gradient of at least 3 percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet from the building perimeters be provided, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of 1 percent should be provided, unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structures. 9.2 Subgrade Protection To the extent that it is possible, existing pavement should be used for construction of staging areas. If building construction will proceed during the winter, we recommend the use of � working surface of sand and gravel, crushed rock, or quarry spalls to protect exposed soils, particularly in areas supporting concentrated equipment traffic. In winter construction staging areas and areas that will be subjected to repeated heavy loads, such as those that occur during construction of masonry walls, a minimum thickness of 12 inches of quarry spalls or 18 inches of pit run sand and gravel is recommended. If subgrade conditions are soft and silty, a geotextile separation fabric, such as Mirafi 5OOX or approved equivalent, should be used between the subgrade and the new fill. For building pads where floor slabs and foundation construction will be completed in the winter, a similar working surface should be used, composed of at least 6 inches of pit run sand and gravel or crushed rock. Construction of working surfaces from advancing fill pads could be used to avoid directly exposing the subgrade soils to vehicular traffic. Foundation subgrades may require protection from foot and equipment traffic and ponding of runoff during wet weather conditions. Typically, compacted crushed rock or a lean -mix concrete mat placed over a'properly prepared subgrade provides adequate subgrade protection. Foundation concrete should be placed and excavations backfilled as soon as possible to protect the bearing surface. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects 1201205041KEIWP Page 12 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations 9.3 Proof -Rolling and Subgrade Compaction Following the recommended clearing, site stripping, and planned excavation, the stripped subgrade within the building areas should be proof -rolled with heavy, rubber -tired construction equipment, such as a fully loaded, tandem -axle dump truck. Proof -rolling should be performed prior to structural fill placement or foundation excavation. The proof -roll should be monitored by the geotechnical engineer so that any soft or yielding subgrade soils can be identified. Any soft/loose, yielding soils should be removed to a stable subgrade. The subgrade should then be scarified, adjusted in moisture content, and recompacted to the required density. Proof -rolling should only be attempted if soil moisture contents are at or near optimum moisture content. Proof -rolling of wet subgrades could result in further degradation. Low areas and excavations may then be raised to the planned finished grade with compacted structural fill. Subgrade preparation and selection, placement, and compaction of structural fill should be performed under engineering -controlled conditions in accordance with the project specifications. 9.4 Overexcavation/Stabilization Construction during extended wet weather periods could create the need to overexcavate exposed soils if they become disturbed and cannot be recompacted due to elevated moisture content and/or weather conditions. Even during dry weather periods, soft/wet soils, which may need to be overexcavated, may be encountered in some portions of the site. If overexcavation is necessary, it should be confirmed through continuous observation and testing by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI). Soils that have become unstable may require remedial measures in the form of one or more of the following: 1. Drying and recompaction. Selective drying may be accomplished by scarifying or windrowing surficial material during extended periods of dry and warm weather. 2. Removal of affected soils to expose a suitable bearing subgrade and replacement with compacted structural fill. 3. Mechanical stabilization with a coarse crushed aggregate compacted into the subgrade, possibly in conjunction with a geotextile. 4. Soil/cement admixture stabilization. 9.5 Wet Weather Conditions If construction proceeds during an extended wet weather construction period and the moisture -sensitive site soils become wet, they will become unstable. Therefore, the bids for site grading operations should be based upon the time of year that construction will proceed. It is March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPLIpc — M20504A3 — Projects 120120504UM WP Page 13 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washin,2ton Design Recommendations expected that in wet conditions additional soils may need to be removed and/or other stabilization methods used, such as a coarse crushed rock working mat to develop a stable condition if silty subgrade soils are disturbed in the presence of excess moisture. The severity of construction disturbance will be dependent, in part, on the precautions that are taken by the contractor to protect the moisture- and disturbance -sensitive site soils. If overexcavation is necessary, it should be confirmed through continuous observation and testing by a representative of our firm. 9.6 Temporary and Permanent Cut Slopes In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, we anticipate that temporary, unsupported cut slopes in the existing fill or loose to medium dense native deposits can be made at a maximum slope of 1.5H:1V or flatter. Temporary slopes in dense to very dense deposits may be planned at 1H:1V. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur, and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. If ground water seepage is encountered in cut slopes, or if surface water is not routed away from temporary cut slope faces, flatter slopes will be required. In addition, WISHAIOSHA regulations should be followed at all times. We understand that a steep temporary excavation may be planned in close proximity to Highway 99, and that it may not be feasible to maintain the above -recommended temporary cut slopes for this excavation without impacting the existing right-of-way or existing improvements. In lieu of an open temporary excavation, a shoring system, such as a soldier pile wall, would then be needed to provide temporary excavation support. Recommendations for a soldier pile wall shoring system are provided in Section 15.0. Permanent cut and structural fill slopes that are not intended to be exposed to surface water should be designed at inclinations of 2H:1V or flatter. All permanent cut or fill slopes should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM:D 1557, and the slopes should be protected from erosion by sheet plastic until vegetation cover can be established during favorable weather. 9.7 Frozen Subgrades If earthwork takes place during freezing conditions, all exposed subgrades should be allowed to thaw and then be recompacted prior to placing subsequent lifts of structural fill or foundation components. Alternatively, the frozen material could be stripped from the subgrade to reveal unfrozen soil prior to placing subsequent lifts of fill or foundation components. The frozen soil should not be reused as structural fill until allowed to thaw and adjusted to the proper moisture content, which may not be possible during winter months. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPUpc — M20504A3 — Projects 1201205041KEIWP Page 14 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations 10.0 STRUCTURAL FILL All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type and placement, and compaction of materials, as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer, the upper 12 inches of exposed ground in areas to receive fill should be recompacted to 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. If the subgrade contains silty soils and too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contaiuhlation of the free -draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free -draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non -organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum density using ASTM:D 1557 as the standard. In the case of roadway and utility trench filling, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with current City of Federal Way codes and standards. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the locations of the roadway edges before sloping down at an angle of 2H:1 V . The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils must be evaluated by AESI prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture -sensitive. Use of moisture -sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather conditions. The native and existing fill soils present on -site contained variable amounts of silt and are considered moisture sensitive. As shown in Table 1 above, the moisture contents of samples collected during our exploration vary widely, and generally exceed the optimum moistures for compaction as determined by the laboratory Proctor tests. Therefore, we anticipate that the use of on -site soils as structural fill will require moisture conditioning to achieve proper compaction. In addition, construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120SO4A3 — Projects 1201205041KEIWP Page 15 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free -draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free -draining fill consists of non -organic soil with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction with at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. A representative from our firm should inspect the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in -place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling progresses, and any problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid in developing a suitable monitoring and testing program. 11.0 FOUNDATIONS For footings bearing directly on the medium dense to very dense natural sediments, or on structural fill placed over these materials, as described above, we recommend that an allowable foundation soil bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) be utilized for design purposes, including both dead and live loads. If higher bearing pressures are needed, including for any proposed detention vaults, a value of 5,000 psf may be used for footings placed either directly on very dense natural soil, or over trench lines excavated to the very dense natural soils and backfilled with either concrete, controlled density fill (CDF), or gravel conforming to Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specification 9-03.14(1) for Gravel Borrow. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. However, all footings must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum, and no footing should be founded in or above organic or loose soils. All footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches. It should be noted that the area bound by lines extending downward at 1H:1V from any footing must not intersect another footing or intersect a filled area that has not been compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. In addition, a 1.5H:1V line extending down from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. Anticipated settlement of footings founded as described above should be on the order of 3/ inch or less. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing excavations prior to footing placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be inspected by AESI March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — M20504A3 — Projects 120120504WE1WP Page 16 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations prior to placing concrete to verify that the design bearing capacity of the soils has been attained and that construction conforms to the recommendations comained in this report. Such inspections may be required by the governing municipality. Perimeter footing drains should be provided, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. 11.1 Drainage Considerations Foundations should be provided with foundation drains placed at the base of footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the proposed buildings. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system, but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the proposed structures to achieve surface drainage. 12.0 FLOOR SUPPORT If crawl -space floors are used, an impervious moisture barrier should be provided above the soil surface within the crawl space. Slab -on -grade floors may be used over medium dense to very dense native soils, or over structural fill placed as recommended in the "Site Preparation" and "Structural Fill" sections of this report. Slab design can assume a soil subgrade modulus of 200 pounds per cubic inch (pci) for slabs cast over the dense to very dense, natural sediments or a limited thickness of properly compacted structural fill placed over these materials. Slab -on -grade floors should be cast atop a minimum of 4 inches of washed pea gravel or washed crushed "chip" rock with less than 3 percent passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve to act as a capillary break. The floors should also be protected from dampness by covering the capillary break layer with an impervious moisture barrier at least 10 mils in thickness. 13.0 CAST -IN -PLACE RETAINING WALLS AND FOUNDATION WALLS All backfill behind retaining walls, including for planned detention vaults, or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed using an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled, rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. Walls with sloping backfill up to a maximum gradient of 2H:1V should be designed using an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf for yielding conditions or 75 pcf for fully restrained conditions. If parking areas are adjacent to March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects 120120504 "1 WP Page 17 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. As required by the 2012 IBC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we recommend a seismic surcharge pressure of 8H and 11H psf, where H is the wall height in feet for the "active" and "at -rest" loading conditions, respectively. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the mid -point of the walls. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on -site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM:D 1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended, as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab -on -grade or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum, 1-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. A prefabricated drainage mat is not a suitable substitute for the gravel blanket drain unless all backfill against the wall is free -draining. 13.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural glacial soils or supporting structural fill soils, and by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following allowable design parameters: ■ Passive equivalent fluid = 350 pcf • Coefficient of friction = 0.30 March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - KF120504A3 - Projects 120120504Ual WP Page 18 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations 14.0 DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS All retaining and perimeter foundation walls should be provided with a drain at the base of the footing elevation. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The level of the perforations in the pipe should be set at or slightly below the bottom of the footing grade beam, and the drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the buildings. In addition, all retaining walls should be lined with a minimum, 12-inch-thick, washed gravel blanket that extends to within 1 foot of the surface and is continuous with the foundation drain. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the foundation drain system, but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the structures to achieve surface drainage. 15.0 SOLDIER PILE SHORING WALL We understand that temporary excavations may include a steep cut adjacent to Highway 99. We anticipate that a cantilever soldier pile shoring wall consisting of closely spaced H-beam piles suitably embedded in the underlying very dense native soils will provide the necessary support when designed by a qualified structural engineer. Treated timber lagging, as specified by the structural engineer, should be used to support the soil between the piles. The construction sequence for pile shoring systems typically involves installing each pile to the minimum specified embedment depth below the base of excavation under the observation of the geotechnical engineer or designated field representative. Drilled and grouted piles should be allowed to set for at least 72 hours prior to beginning excavation. Once the piles have been installed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer, excavation may proceed in vertical sections of 4 feet or less. The actual height of the excavated sections that provide a stable excavation face should be adjusted in the field depending on actual soil and ground water conditions at the time of excavation, but should not exceed 4 feet. Treated timber lagging, as specified by the structural engineer, should be installed and backfilled with permeable soils to prevent the buildup of water behind the lagging boards. No excavation sections should be left open overnight. We recommend that the temporary cantilever shoring system be designed to resist an active lateral earth pressure of 35(H+2) psf, presented as a triangular distribution for a backslope ranging up to 20 percent. The H+2 component represents the height of the proposed cut (H) plus 2 feet for a traffic surcharge. The active earth pressure is assumed to act over the pile spacing above the excavation base. An allowable passive resistance of 350(D-2) psf can also be assumed to act over twice the pile diameter (or grouted diameter) below the excavation base. The upper 2 feet on the passive side of the piles should be neglected and truncated from March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPUpc — KE120504A3 — Projects120120504"I WP Page 19 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations a triangular distribution. These recommendations for lateral earth pressures are illustrated on Figure 3. If excavation depths are great enough to require tieback anchors, we should provide situation -specific design parameters. If adjacent structures, heavy construction traffic, materials stockpiling, or other substantial surcharges are to be applied during construction, these surcharges should also be included in the design. We recommend a minimum depth of embedment of 10 feet below the base of the excavation for all piles. The actual pile embedment should be determined by the structural engineer. The relatively clean sand encountered in our exploration borings may cause caving conditions. The drilling contractor should be prepared to use casing, drilling slurry, or other methods of stabilizing the hole in the case of caving soil conditions. If more than 6 inches of standing water or slough is present at the bottom of the boring prior to grout placement, the contractor should be prepared to use a tremie pipe to place grout continuously from the bottom up. Grout may consist of lean -mix concrete or CDF, as specified by the structural engineer, to ease chipping for lagging installation. Timber lagging can be designed to resist reduced lateral earth pressures as a result of soil arching between piles. For the site soils, the lagging can be designed to resist 60 percent of the calculated lateral load at any given point. Caving could be experienced when excavating and installing lagging between piles. Overexcavation of soils should be avoided. Excavation should extend just far enough to allow lagging installation. Any void spaces behind lagging should be quickly identified and filled with pea gravel, CDF, or other suitable material to prevent caving and loss of support for adjacent ground. 16.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Pavement areas should be prepared in accordance with the "Site Preparation" section of this report. If the stripped native soil or existing fill pavement subgrade can be compacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557 and is firm and unyielding, no additional overexcavation is required. Soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated to provide a suitable subgrade and backfilled with structural fill. The pavement sections included in this report section are for driveway and parking areas on -site, and are not applicable to right-of-way improvements. At this time we are not aware of any planned right-of-way improvements; however, if any new paving of public streets is required, we should be allowed to offer situation -specific recommendations. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects 1201205041KEIWP Page 20 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations The exposed ground should be recompacted to 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557. If required, structural fill may then be placed to achieve desired subbase grades: Upon completion of the recompaction and structural fill, the proposed pavement section consisting of 2 inches of asphaltic concrete pavement (ACP) underlain by 4 inches of 11/4-inch crushed surfacing base course is the recommended minimum in areas of planned passenger car driving and parking. A geotextile separation fabric, such as Mirafi 50OX or approved equivalent, should be used between the base course and the underlying soil subgrade. In driveway areas subjected to heavier loads, such as that from delivery trucks or school busses, a minimum pavement section consisting of 3 inches of ACP underlain by 2 inches of 5/8-inch crushed surfacing top course and 4 inches of 1 1/4-inch crushed surfacing base course is recommended. The crushed rock courses must be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum density, as determined by ASTM:D 1557. All paving materials should meet gradation criteria contained in the current WSDOT Standard Specifications. Depending on construction staging and desired performance, the crushed base course material may be substituted with asphalt treated base (ATB) beneath the final asphalt surfacing. The substitution of ATB should be as follows: 4 inches of crushed rock can be substituted with 3 inches of ATB, and 6 inches of crushed rock may be substituted with 4 inches of ATB. ATB should be placed over a native or structural fill subgrade compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative density, and a 11/2— to 2-inch thickness of crushed rock to act as a working surface. If ATB is used for construction access and staging areas, some rutting and disturbance of the ATB surface should be expected. The general contractor should remove affected areas and replace them with properly compacted ATB prior to final surfacing. 17.0 DETENTION POND CONSIDERATIONS We understand that a detention pond is currently under consideration at the western portion of the subject site as part of the proposed improvements. As part of our exploration program, we completed two exploration borings at the area of the proposed western detention pond. In summary, these exploration borings encountered loose to medium dense fill, with organic material, to depths of 7 and 11 feet. Since fill sediments were encountered at the likely elevations of the pond bottom and side slopes, it is our opinion that the pond needs to be provided with a liner. The following sections provide our recommendations for both soil and synthetic liner systems for the proposed pond. 17.1 Soil Liners A low permeability soil material may be used to line the pond and to construct the embankment (if necessary). The soil liner and embankment soil should contain at least 20 percent fines or soil particles smaller than the U.S. No. 200 sieve and a maximum of 60 percent sand. The March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc — KE120504A3 — Projects 120120504"K WP Page 21 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations liner and embankment material should be placed at a moisture content approximately 2 to 3 percent over its optimum moisture content and be compacted to at least 95 percent of ASTM D 1557 to reduce in -place permeability and the potential for wetting -induced soil consolidation. Samples of the soils slated for use as pond liner and embankment fill should be tested by AESI to determine if they have a suitable gradation prior to construction. Density testing should also be performed by AESI during construction of liner and embankment to verify suitable compaction. 17.2 Synthetic Liners A synthetic liner system may be used for the proposed detention pond. We have also included recommendations for the use of a cellular confinement system to retain the pond liner cover soil or topsoil growth medium above the liner, if required. If the pond will be lined, the existing fill can remain in place, provided the material is cleaned of debris, moisture -conditioned, and compacted to a firm and unyielding condition. A cellular confinement system is recommended to retain liner cover soils and any recommended topsoil growth medium above the completed liner. A cellular confinement system, such as Geoweb® or TerracellO, can be installed for purposes of topsoil containment and slope erosion control. The proposed system should be approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to installation. We recommend the use of 6-inch-deep cells. Install the selected system in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Anchors for the cellular confinement system should be installed so as to prevent stress points from forming and to prevent the system from sliding. Anchors should not penetrate the pond liner. The cell openings should be filled with either a clean pit run sand and gravel as a liner cover or topsoil specified by the project landscape architect, depending on location in the pond. 17.3 Pond Berms/Slopes Interior detention pond slopes should be made at a maximum gradient of 311:1V or flatter, and should be consistent with the manufacturer's recommendations for the cellular confinement system, if selected. Exterior perimeter berm slopes, if required, should be made at a maximum gradient of 211:1V. Perimeter pond berms should have a minimum top width of 6 feet. A base key equal to one-half the berm width and a minimum of 3 feet deep should extend below the base of the pond berm. The keyway trench should be backfilled with low permeability structural fill with the gradation properties recommended in this section. Additionally, detention pond berm geometry should conform to municipal design standards. AESI is available to perform a geotechnical review of the final detention pond plans once they are available. March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - KE120504A3 - Projects 1201205041W WP Page 22 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Federal Way High School Replacement and Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Design Recommendations 18.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING Our report is preliminary since project plans were not finalized at the time this report was written. We recommend that AESI perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, we can confirm that our earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation system depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of this current scope of work. If these services are desired, please let us know, and we will prepare a cost proposal. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Jeffrey aub, L.G., L.E.G. Senior Project Engineering Geologist Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map 0 .� y_ ^s8o C�S,SIOli Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer Figure 2: Site and Exploration Plan Figure 3: Lateral Earth Pressures - Temporary Cantilever Shoring Appendix: Exploration Logs Laboratory Testing March 10, 2014 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. JPL/pc - KE120504A3 - Projects 1201205041MWP Page 23 POVERTY BAY r �; j� iIL .--A -:•i�r �- f - r� Yam' ! Y L i'�l- 1 � A ....r _7•• ` C, ` � ,I' L •' '` � r • atk , L ,r • 1 pf ! ' r j LIT .�.._. f� 4 Steal Yet ��° •Y� - `ramIT It fir j J /- '� N CE J 7-77, KIRK .�• 1 4• f .l f' NOTE: BLACK AND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR ORIGINAL MAY FEET Z; REFERENCE: USGS TOPO! REDUCE ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO INCORRECT INTERPRETATION, a Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL DATE 1/14 N El Ej D K *R- FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KE120504A ACTIVE PRESSURES ACT ( LAGGED PORTION OF WAL EXCAVATION BASE ,ESSURE 'O ACT PILE A ACTIVE EFD = 35 (H+2) PSF ALLOWABLE PASSIVE EFD = 350 (D-2) PSF SEE NOTE 4 NOTES: 1. PILE EMBEDMENT DEPTH'D' SHOULD CONSIDER NECESSARY VERTICAL CAPACITY KICKOUT, AND OVERTURNING RESISTANCE. 2. DIAGRAM DOES NOT INCLUDE HYDROSTATIC PRESSURES AND ASSUMES WALLS ARE SUITABLY DRAINED TO PREVENT BUILD-UP OF HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE. 3. DIAGRAM DOES NOT INCLUDE PRESSURES DUE TO SURFACE SURCHARGES FROM ANY ADJACENT STRUCTURES. THESE PRESSURES MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. B 4. ALLOWABLE PASSIVE PRESSURE INCLUDES FACTOR OF SAFETY OF APPROXIMATELY 1.5. 0 8 NO SCALE z Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES FIGURE 3 TEMPORARY CANTILEVER SHORING DATE 1/14 S ® FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON PROJ. NO. KE120504A APPENDIX ; o Well -graded gravel and Terms Describing Relative Density and Consistency 2 _ - o^$^ GW gravel with sand, little to Density SPTt�lblows/foot m ;u ; o no fines Very Loose 0 to 4 Coarse- m> Loose 4 to 10 Grained Soils Medium Dense 10 to 30 Test Symbols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Poorly -graded gravel un 00000 GP and gravel with sand, Dense 30 to 50 o ° 'o 00000 00000 little to no fines G= Grain Size Very Dense >50 N z 0 (2 M= Moisture Content )blows/foot p p o o `o Consistency SPT A = Atterbrg Limits z m m , , Silty gravel and silty Very Soft 0 to 2 C = Chemiecal o ° - - GM gravel with sand Fine- Soft 2 to 4 DD =Dry Density m � m - Grained Soils Medium Stiff 4 to 8 K = Permeability 0 07rL 0 o Stiff 8 to 15 N !9 Clayey gravel and Very Stiff 15 to 30 Ni Gc clayey gravel with sand Hard >30 o C Component Definitions tWell Descriptive Term Size Range and Sieve Number o -graded sand and sw sand with gravel, little Boulders Larger than 12' O V_ to no fines Cobbles T to 12" C . Gravel 3" to No. 4 (4.75 mm) : _ ,.: __ • Poorly -graded sand �+ m > o �, Coarse Gravel 3" to 3/4" U) w ' •:= SP and sand with gravel, Fine Gravel 3/4" to No. 4 (4.75 mm) m v little to no fines Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) 0 z Coarse Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 10 (2.00 mm) m _ Silty sand and Medium Sand No. 10 (2.00 mm) to No. 40 (0.425 mm) E ° InaSM silty sand with Fine Sand No. 40 (0.425 mm) to No. 200 (0,075 mm) (j o o LL gravel Slit and Clay Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) u� Clayey sand and (3) Estimated Percentage Moisture Content Allclayey Sc sand with gravel percentage hY Dry - Absence of moisture, ccn Component — Weight dusty, dry to the touch Trace <5 Slightly Moist - Perceptible moisture Silt, sand silt, ravel) silt, y gravelly o c MIL silt with sand or ravel g Few 5 to 10 Little 15 to 25 Moist - Damp but no visible y r With -Non-primary coarse water o N constituents: > 15% Very Moist - Water visible but — ry Clay of low to medium `V n m plasticity; silty, sandy, or -Fines content between not free draining z -2 — CL , gravelly clay, lean clay 5% and 15�/ Wet - Vlslble free water, usual) y from below water table N a 5 =— Organic clay or silt of low Symbols N :3 — — OL plasticity Blows/61 or Sampler portion of 6" Cement grout 0 -= Type surface seal Elastic silt, clayey silt, silt 2.0" OD Sampler Type MH with micaceous or ,D Split -spoon p ❑BS--fin (•) Bealonite o diatomaceous fine sand or Sampler 3.0" OD Split -Spoon Sam ler PP — :, Filter pack with .o 0 slit (SPT} 3.25 OD Split -Spoon Ring Sampler (4) blank casing : g Clay of high plasticity, U) m E5 o ,O CH sandy or gravelly clay, fat Bulk sample - 3.0" OD Thin -Wall Tube Sampler section =' Screened casing N E clay with sand or gravel (including Shelby tube) =' orFfillerp with filterpack ( Grab Sample End cap o �ri�fi f,��rr Or clay or silt of 0 Portion not recovered -' ir�rrf /I OH medium to high rl (4) Percentage fry dry weight Depth of ground water rr frf plasticity (2) (SPT) Standard Penetration Test 1 ATD = At time of drilling (s) (ASTM D-1586) Q Static water level (date) In General Accordance with a Peat, muck and other o, E m o, w PT highly organic soils Standard Practice for Description (� Combined USCS symbols used for = o and Identification of Soils (ASTM D-2488) fines between 5% and 15% Classifications of soils in this report are based on Visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and plastiddy estimates and should not be construed to Imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual -manual and/or laboratory classification methods of ASTM D 2487 and D-248B were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil classification System, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. xEXPLORATION LOG KEY FIGURE Al 0 x 0 a [V a Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exploration Log LilKE120504A ® &g ® Project Number Exploration Number Sheet EB-1 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Way High School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way, WA Datum N1 Driller/Equipment Boretec / Track Rig Date Start/Finish 1 /2I14 1 /,2/1 d Hammer Weight/Drop 140# / 30" Hole Diameter (in) R inGhp� c (n U Q a E O a) � J Blows/Foot rn F�- a S E m >, T C7 3: o o `m s o DESCRIPTION 0 3: m 10 20 30 40 I ❑cnhaSt - 7 inrhac 1;1 Iim iU 20 25 Vashon Lodgement Till S-1 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). S-2 I'• t 11 '•I Moist, brownish gray, silty fine SAND, with gravel (SM). S-3 I. "� - As above. Bottom of exploration boring at 10.2 feet Sampler Type (ST): 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample -V- Water Level 0 ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Samplet Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Logged by: JPL Approved by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exploration Cote Project Number Exploration Number Sheet 0� M KE120504A EB-2 1 1 of 1 Project Name Federal ay High School _ Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way A Datum -WA— Drill er/Eq ui pment Boretec / Track Rig_ Date Start/Finish 1 /2114,112/14 Hammer Weight/Drop 14 # 0" Hole Diameter (in) C N y Z y O d O N C N Blows/Foot a S E m >, o T o ro s DESCRIPTION U ?� 10 20 30 40 O Moist, dark brown to brown, silty SAND, with gravel, with organics (SM). 6 S-1 _ 571 2" 7 Vashon Lodgement Till 5 S-2 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). 10 S_3 ; • • _ As above. 5a Bottom of exploration boring at 10.4 feet 15 20 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JPL 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample a Water Level() Approved by: ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exploration Loa ' Project Number Exploration Number Sheet KE120504A EB-3 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Way iah hod Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way�iv A Datum -N/A Driller/Equipment Boretec / Track Rig Date Start/Finish I twi Q,11911 d Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130" Hole Diameter (in) F inchas c _ c a c �, a d 3 Blows/Foot a s T o id m L n w DESCRIPTION 0 10 20 30 40 ° Pre -Fraser Deposits Moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, with rootlets (SM). 6 S-1 10 20 10 5 Moist, slightly rust stained brown to brownish gray, silty fine to medium 8-2 ; SAND, with gravel (SM). 7 12 30 18 10 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). S-3 15 27 72 45 — 15 As above. 13 S 4 29 79 Bottom of exploration boring at 16.3 feet - 20 - 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JPL m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Q Water Level 0 Approved by: ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exploration Log _,��❑ � � ® Project Number Exploration Number Sheet KE120504A EB-4 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Wav Hi h Schoo[ Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way, A Datum NIA Driller/Equipment Boret I Track Rig Date Start/Finish 112114.119114 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# / 30' Hole Diameter (in) _ c m y V p (D m r - U) Blows/Foot I - a S E `2>, �:ECd ° T C ° DESCRIPTION U 3 10 20 30 40 ° Asphalt - 2 inches Pre -Fraser Deposits Moist, rust stained brownish gray, SILT, with fine sand, with gravel (ML). 7 S-1 5 `10 5 5 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine SAND, with gravel (SM). s S-2 7 A 7 10 - 10 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine SAND, with gravel (SM). S-3 = 21 21 k41 20 - 15 S-4 :.: Moist, slightly rust stained brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with 25 gravel (SM). 501 Bottom of exploration boring at 16 feet — 20 — 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JPL 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) n Ring Sample �-Z Water Level b Approved by: ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) a Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exploration Loa ® ' � ' Project Number Exploration Number Sheet KE120504A EB-5 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Wav Hi h School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way, A _ _ Datum • A Driller/Equipment Boretec I Track Rig Date Start/Finish 1 /2J14,1 /2/14 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# / 30" Hole Diameter (in) R inr•.hes N U 2 > y N Blows/Foot S E m� Emo `m T �� m `� DESCRIPTION U 10 20 30 40 ° Pre -Fraser Deposits Moist, slightly rust stained brownish gray, silty fine SAND, with gravel (SM). S 1 6 4 AL11 7 5 Moist, slightly rust stained brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with S-2 .' gravel, trace organics (SM). 7 11 29 18 — 10 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine SAND, with gravel (SM). 16 S-3 25 or 75! " — 15 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). 29 Bottom of exploration boring at 15.9 feet — 20 - 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JPL 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample SZ Water Level 0 Approved by: ® Grab Sample Z Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. f ; u � Project Number KE120504A Exploration Log Exploration Number EB-6 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Wav High SChool Ground Surface Elevation (ft) — Location FedBral Way. WA Datum _N/A Driller/Equipment Bor to Track Rig DateStart/Finish 1/9/14,119114 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# fl" Hole Diameter (in) _,6 inchas h U p a a� ZD � � Blows/Foot H r a S E `` a)T �E o a`) r in 0 u) DESCRIPTION 0 m 0 3 10 20 30 40 Asphalt - 2 inches 5 10 Pre -Fraser Deposits Moist, rust stained brownish gray, silty fine SAND, with gravel, trace S-1 organics (SM). Moist, brownish gray and tan, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel, trace S_2 organics (SM). S-3 15 b S-4 11 20 25 Auger refusal at 7 feet; attempted sample (100/0") - bouncing on rock. Shifted 6 feet northward and drilled to 10 feet. Moist, slightly rust stained brownish gray, SILT, with fine sand, with gravel (MIL). No recovery. Bottom of exploration boring at 15.2 feet 31 1 A22 11 17 29 CL I I I I l Sampler Type (ST): N m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture o m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample Water Level() co W ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Logged by: JPL Approved by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exploration Log ❑ ® Project Number Exploration Number Sheet KE120504A EB-7 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Way High School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way. WA Datum N/A Driller/Equipment Boretec / Track Rig Date Start/Finish I Z2114 1 /9/14 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# / 30" Hole Diameter (in) S inr heS t LO c � N m J _ CD tl) Blows/Foot p T rj C7 � o 8 m s DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 40 ° Asphalt - 3 Inches Pre -Fraser Deposits Moist, brown, silty SAND, with gravel, with asphalt pieces (SM). is S-1 12 A24 12 5 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). S-2 18 24 51 27 - 10 S 3 '- As above. 26 o/ T Bottom of exploration boring at 10.8 feet - 15 - 20 - 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JPL 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) n Ring Sample 7- Water Level Q Approved by: ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. iExploration ..�- ❑ � � � s Loci Project Number Exploration Number KE120504A EB-8 Sheet 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Way High School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way. WA _ Datum N/A Driller/Equipment B retec / Track Ric Date Start/Finish -/3/14,1/3/14 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130° _. Hole Diameter (in) F inrhaG - t Q a� f m Blows/Foot a S E E! 5, E °' ° t T � ° DESCRIPTION ° m 10 20 30 40 ° Pre -Fraser Deposits Moist, reddish brown to brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with 8_1 gravel (SM). 4 . .. 24 1 '&42 5 Moist, brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). 9 S-2 if 1F 10 As above. S-3 :. 15 m As above. ,II S-4 Bottom of exploration boring at 16.4 feet 20 25 29 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JPL [E 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) 1] Ring Sample �Z Water Level() Approved by: 5 Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) 0 N n Associated Earth Sciences, Imc. ❑ kg ® Project Number KE120504A Exploration Log_ Exploration Number Sheet EB-9 1 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Wav HI h School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal W _ Datum MIA Driller/Equipment B C t [Track Rig DateStart/Finish jZ311A-1f.2/14 _ Hammer Weight/Drop 140# / 3q" Hole Diameter (in) F inr_ S U) t a E O > - CD a fh Blows/Foot y CD o T 'O � � � m � co DESCRIPTION o 10 20 30 40 ° Fill Moist, brown and gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel, with S-1 organics (SM). 1t 9 B 5 As above. S-2 2 2 A3 1 As above. 3 S-3 3 4 10 As above, moist to wet. 2 S-4 . 3 Pre -Fraser Deposits 5 Moist, slightly rust stained bluish gray, SILT, with fine to medium sand (ML), Moist, rust stained brown and gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel S-5 :• (SM). 11 1 17 15 Wet, brownish ,gray, fine to coarse SAND, with silt, with gravel, with siltier S-6 ; zones (SW-SM). 20 Wet, brownish gray, silty fine to coarse SAND, with gravel (SM). Bottom of exploration boring at 21.5 feet 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: JPL m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample SL Water Level() Approved by: ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Exploration Loci RA Project Number i Exploration Number Sheet KE120504A EB-10 1 of 1 Project Name Federal Wav Koh Schooi Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Location Federal Way. WA _ ._ Datum N/A Driller/Equipment BoreteC /Track Rig Date Start/Finish 113114 1 /B/14 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 1 W" Hole Diameter (in) F inrhps L n o a S E T in _ 0 an 215, DESCRIPTION m a� �a E U °' m 3 CO � 3: m Blows/Foot 10 20 30 40 w `m L ° Fill Moist, brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel, with organics 2 S-1 ': (SM). 2 A4 2 5 Wet, brown and gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). S-2 = A4 3 Pre -Fraser Deposits Moist, bluish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). 4 S-3 =J-'• 6 A 7 11 10 Moist, slightly rust stained gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel S-4 .-': '. (SM). 12 3a 18 15 Wet, brownish gray, silty fine to medium SAND, with gravel (SM). S-5 13 20 A42 22 20 S-6 . = As above, moist. 22 p/ ° 721 2" Bottom of exploration boring at 21 feet 25 Sampler Type {ST). m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U. Ring Sample Q Water Level () ® Grab Sample E Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Logged by: JPL Approved by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. ProctorAinalysis ASTM D1557, D698 Ll )ate Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description /2/2014 Federal Way HS KE120504A Tested B, Collected By Location EB/EP No. Depth Grey Till AS JPL Onsite EB-1 15-8'Cut. Percent passing 3/4" sieve: 97% 1 ASTM D1557 Method C I Automatic Tamper A Mold Number 1 2 3 4 Remarks B Water Added field wet wet dry C JMold(lb) Wt. of Wet Soil + 22.370 22.955 22.465 21.750 D Wt. of Mold (lb) 11.830 11.830 11.830 11.830 E Wt. of Wet Soil (lb) 10.540 11.125 10.635 9.920 F Wet Density, (pcf) 141.573 149.431 142.849 133.246 G Wt. of Pan (lb) 97.680 0.485 0.500 0.485 H Wt. of Wet Soil + Pan (lb) 413.AJrl " 1.365 1.360 1.525 J Wt. of Dry Soil + Pan (lb) 405.230 1.320 1.300 1.515 K Wt. of Water (lb) 8.180 0.045 0.060 0.010 M Wt. of Dry Soil (lb) 307.550 0.835 0.800 1.030 N Moisture Content 00 2.7 5.4 7.5 1.0 O Dry Density (pcf) 137.9 141.8 132.9 132.0 L�]Z For a 6 inch mold: Z = 0.074449 For a 4" mold: Z = 0.0333 Test Results: Optimum Moisture Percentage: 4.0 Maximum Dry Density: 142.0 Correction for oversize: ASTM D4718 Corrected Moisture Percentage: N/A Corrected Maximum Dry Density: N/A Assumed Specific Gravity: 2.7 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 Fifth Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. MA Proctor Anai sis ASTM ❑1557 ❑698 Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/2/2014 Federal Way HS KE120504A Weathered Till Tested B, Collected By Location EB/EP No. Depth MS JPL Onsite EB-3 3-61 Cut Percent passing 3/4" sieve: 98% ASTM D1557 Method C Automatic Tamper A Mold Number 1 2 3 4 Remarks B Water Added field dry dry dry C Wt. of Wet Soil + Mold(lb) 21.200 21.850 21.605 21.125 D Wt. of Mold (lb) 11.830 11.830 11.830 11.830 E Wt. of Wet Soil (lb) 9.370 10.020 9.775 9.295 F Wet Density, (pcf) 125.858 134.589 131.298 124.851 G Wt. of Pan (lb) 101.120 0.485 0.500 0.485 H Wt. of Wet Soil + Pan (lb) 324.110 1.610 1.425 1.475 J Wt. of Dry Soil + Pan(lb) 287.540 1.450 1.320 1.380 K Wt. of Water (lb) 36.570 0.160 0.105 0.095 M Wt. of Dry Soil (lb) 186.420 0.965 0.820 0.895 N Moisture Content 19.6 16.6 12.8 10.6 O Dry Density (pcf) 105.2 115.4 116.4 1 112.9 Z For a 6 inch mold: Z = 0.074449 For a 4" mold: Z = 0.0333 Test Results: Optimum Moisture Percentage: 9.0 Maximum Dry Density: 117.5 Correction for oversize: ASTM D4718 Corrected Moisture Percentage: N/A Corrected Maximum Dry Density: N/A Assumed Specific Gravity: 2.7 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 Fifth Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. M U Proctor Analysis ASTM D1557 D698 Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/3/2014 Federal Way HS KE120504A Fill Tested B, Collected By Location EB/EP No. Depth MS JPL Onsite EB-9 3-7' Cuts Percent passing 3/4" sieve: 97% 1 ASTM D1557 Method C I Automatic Tamper A Mold Number 1 2 3 4 Remarks B Water Added field dry dry dry C Wt. of Wet Soil + Mold(lb) 20.430 21.550 21.220 20.550 D Wt. of Mold (lb) 11.830 11.830 11.830 11.830 E Wt. of Wet Soil (lb) 8.600 9.720 9.390 8.720 F Wet Density, (pcf) 115.515 130.559 126.127 117.127 G Wt. of Pan (lb) 0.500 0.460 0.500 0.500 H Pan Ib Wt. of Wet Soil + 1.42G 1.775 1.915 1.625 J Wt. of Dry Soil + Pan(lb) 1.225 1.590 1.745 1.515 K Wt. of Water (lb) 0.195 0.185 0.170 0.110 M Wt. of Dry Soil (lb) 0.725 1.130 1.245 1.015 N Moisture Content 26.9 16.4 13.7 10.8 O Dry Density (pcf) 91.0 112.2 111.0 105.7 Z For a 6 inch mold: Z = 0.074449 For a 4" mold: Z = 0.0333 125.0 120.0 115.0 i. 110.0 w U 105.0 -E; 100.0 95.0 90.0 85.0 I Test Results: Optimum Moisture Percentage: 16.4 Maximum Dry Density: 112.2 Correction for oversize: ASTM D4718 Corrected Moisture Percentage: N/A Corrected Maximum Dry Density: N/A Assumed Specific Gravity: 2.7 ).0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 moisture content, % ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 Fifth Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS - MECHANICAL Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/2/2014 Federal Way HS KE120504A Silty sand with gravel Tested By Location EB/EP No 15-8'Cuttings Depth MS Onsite EB-1 'Wt. of moisture wet sample + Tare 413.41 Wt. of moisture dry Sample +.Tare 405.23 'Wt. of Tare 97.68 Wt. of moisture Dry Sample 307.55 Moisture % 3% Sample Tare 508.34 Sample wt + tare 1396i84 Sample Wt 888.5 Sample Dry Wt 855.5 Rnarifiratinn RP_nlllrAments Sieve No. Diam. mm Wt. Retained % Retained % Passing Minimum Maximum 3 76.1 0.0 100.0 - - 2.5 64 0.0 100.0 - - 2 50.8 0.0 100.0 - - 1.5 38.1 0.0 100.0 - - 1 25.4 1 0.0 100.0 - - 3/4 19 16.4 1.9 98.1 3/8 9.51 107.74 12.4 87.6 #4 4.76 256.37 29.6 70.4 #8 2.38 352.42 40.7 59.3 #10 2 371.23 42.9 57.1 #20 0.85 442.2 51.1 48.9 #40 0.42 499.5 57.7 42.3 #60 0.25 554.99 64.1 35.9 #100 0.149 593.09 68.5 1 31.5 #200 1 0.074 632-9 73.1 1 26.9 #270 1 0.053 J 642.54 74.2 1 25.8 100 80 c 60 u- C W w 40 IL 20 0 100 US STANDARD SIEVE NOS. 3" 3/4" NO.4 NO.16 NO.40 NO.200 10 1 0.1 0.01 Gravel Sand Silt and Clay Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Grain Size, mm ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS - MECHANICAL Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/2/2014 Federal Way HS KE120504A Silty sand little gravel Tested By Location EB/EP No Depth MS Onsite EB-3 3-6' Cuttings Wt. of moisture wet sample + Tare 324.11 Total Sample Tare 314.77 Wt. of moisture dry Sample + Tare 287.54 Total Sample wt + tare 1025.9 Wt. of Tare 101.12 Total Sample Wt 711.1 Wt. of moisture Dry Sample 186.42 Total Sample Dry Wt 594.5 Moisture % 20% Sieve No. Diam. mm Wt. Retained % Retained % Passing Minimum Maximum 3 76.1 0.0 100.0 - - 2.5 64 0.0 100.0 - - 2 50.8 0.0 100.0 - 1.5 38.1 0.0 100.0 - - 1 25.4 0.0 100.0 - - 3/4 19 53.01 8.9 91.1 3/8 9.51 92.92 15.6 84.4 #4 4.76 137.86 23.2 76.8 #8 2.38 154.09 27.6 72.4 #10 2 171.28 28.8 71.2 #20 0.85 202 34.0 66.0 #40 0.42 237.75 40.0 60.0 #60 0.25 279.97 47.1 52.9 #100 0.149 312.45 52.6 47.4 #200 0.074 354.1 59.6 40.4 #270 0.053 365.54 61.5 38.5 100 80 L 60 lL C C d ti a`) 40 IL 20 0 100 US STANDARD SIEVE NOS. 3" 3W NO.4 NO.16 NO.40 N0.200 10 1 0.1 0_n1 Gravel Sand Silt and Clay Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Grain Size, mm ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS - MECHANICAL Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/2/2014 Federal Way HS KE120504A Silt with sand few gravel Tested By Location EB/EP No Depth 12.5' MS Onsite EB-4 Wt. of moisture wet sample + Tare 249.2. Total Sample Tare Wt. of moisture dry Sample + Tare 206,68 Total Sample wt + tare Wt. of Tare 99.9 Total Sample Wt Wt. of moisture Dry Sample 106.78 Total Sample Dry Wt Moisture % 40% 394.69 754.29 359.6 257.2 Rnoni6rafinn Ranaiiramvntr Sieve No. Diam. (mml Wt. Retained % Retained % Passing Minimum Maximum 3 76.1 0.0 100.0 - - 2.5 64 0.0 100.0 - - 2 50.8 0.0 100.0 - - 1.5 38.1 0.0 100.0 - - 1 25.4 0.0 100.0 - - 3/4 19 16.11 6.3 93.7 3/8 9.51 16.11 6.3 93.7 #4 4.76 18..62 7.2 92.8 #8 2.38 22.12 8.6 91.4 #10 2 26:56 10.3 89.7 #20 0.85 39.11 15.2 84.8 #40 0.42 49.52 19.3 80.7 #60 0.25 68,19 26.5 73.5 #100 0.149 71.73 27.9 72.1 #200 0.074 1 91.55 1 35.6 64.4 #270 1 0.053 1 100.11 1 38.9 1 61.1 100 80 60 U. a+ C 0f d 40 IL 20 0 100 US STANDARD SIEVE NOS. 3" 3/4" NO.4 NO.16 NO.40 NO.200 10 1 0.1 u.ul Gravel Sand Silt and Clay Coarse Fine Coarse Medium7- Fine Grain Size, mm ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS - MECHANICAL Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/2/2014 Federal Way HS KE120504A Silt little sand trace gravel Tested By Location EB/EP No Depth MS Onsite EB-6 110, Wt. of moisture wet sample + Tare 273.59 Total Sample Tare 40U6 Wt. of moisture dry Sample + Tare 239.12 Total Sample wt + tare 879.89 Wt. of Tare 94.92 Total Sample Wt 471.6 Wt. of moisture Dry Sample 144.2 Total Sample Dry Wt 380.6 Moisture % 24% Sieve No. Diam. mm Wt. Retained % Retained % Passing Minimum Maximum 3 76.1 0.0 100.0 - - 2.5 64 0.0 100.0 - - 2 50.8 0.0 100.0 - 1.5 38.1 0.0 100.0 - - 1 25.4 - _- 0.0 100.0 - - 3/4 19 0.0 100.0 3/8 9.51 = __-_ _ -_ = __ 0.0 100.0 #4 4.76 3.3 0.9 99.1 #8 2.38 - €: 7.66; -=-- 2.0 98.0 #10 2 8 86 .-. ..- _ 2.3 97.7 #20 0.85 14.8 3.9 96.1 #40 0.42 5.5 94.5 #60 0.25 306:?=';; ; ::_: 8.7 91.3 #100 0.149 12.3 87.7 #200 0.074 6579.-_ ._..:__ 17.3 82.7 #270 1 0.053 1 71.45 1 18.8 81.2 rili �m��I�III����If111��1 c 60 lL C 01 V 40 20 0 100 10 0.1 NO.200 Gravel Sand Silt and Clay Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Grain Size, mm ASSOCIA TED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-8275424 0.01 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS - MECHANICAL Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/3/2014 Federal Wa HS KE120504A Sand with gravel little silt Tested By Location EB/EP No Depth 12.5' MS Onsite EB-9 'Wt. of moisture wet sample + Tare 151.79 Total Sample Tare 331.$9 'Wt. of moisture dry Sample + Tare 144.4 Total Sample wt + tare 648.6 'Wt. of Tare 99.81 Total Sample Wt 317.2 Wt. of moisture Dry Sample 44.59 Total Sample Dry Wt 272.1 Moisture % 17% Specification Re uirements Sieve No. Diam. mm Wt. Retained % Retained % Passing Minimum Maximum 3 76.1 0.0 100.0 - - 2.5 64 0.0 100.0 - - 2 50.8 0.0 100.0 1.5 38.1 0.0 100.0 - - 1 25.4 0.0 100.0 - - 3/4 19 40.67 14.9 85.1 3/8 9.51 66.74 24.5 75.5 #4 4.76 97.14 35.7 64.3 #8 2.38 123.99 45.6 54.4 #10 2 129.58 47.6 62.4 #20 0.85 149.27 54.9 45.1 #40 0.42 167.07 61.4 38.6 #60 0.25 185.11 68.0 32.0 00.149 190.32 69.9 30.10 ]�2 0.074 212.16 78.0 22.0 #270 0.053 1 217.54 1 79.9 1 20.1 100 80 c 60 ii w c m `m 40 IL 20 0 100 US STANDARD SIEVE NOS. 3. 3/4" NO.4 NO.16 NO.40 NO.200 10 1 0.1 0.01 Gravel Sand Silt and Clay Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Grain Size, mm ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS - MECHANICAL Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/3/2014 Federal Way HS KE120504A Silty sand little gravel Tested By Location EB/EP No Depth 13-7'Cuttings MS Onsite EB-9 Wt. of moisture wet sample + Tare 386.48 Total Sample Tare 398.69: Wt. of moisture dy Samp le + Tare 322.6$ Total Sample wt +tare ti 149.81 Wt. of Tare 95.62 Total Sample Wt 751.1 Wt. of moisture Dry Sample 227.06 Total Sample Dry Wt 629.7 Moisture % 19% Specification Reguirements Sieve No. Diam. mm Wt. Retained % Retained % Passing Minimum Maximum 3 76.1 0.0 100.0 - - 2.5 64 0.0 100.0 - - 2 50.8 0.0 100.0 - - 1.5 38.1 = _- 0.0 100.0 - - 1 25.4 0.0 100.0 - - 3/4 19 29.13 4.6 95.4 3/8 9.51 57.04 9.1 90.9 #4 4.76 :-A30A7a'.:-' :=`' 20.7 79.3 #8 2.38 31.5 68.5 #10 2 7.03 '=== =R< 34.5 65.5 #20 0.85 :, ?:E= 27215`.:._,_ :. 43.2 56.8 #40 0.42 = ' 32618 `::-. =` 51.8 48.2 #60 0.25 :-'>378:87.; -° ''. 60.2 39.8 #100 0.149 _= ":: 4:115 105-1v 1,: 65.9 34.1 #200 0.074 '==:.452r73`:: 71.9 28.1 #270 0.053 - : 462,08_r , `< 73.4 1 26.6 100 80 60 ii c d u iu 40 IL 20 0 100 US STANDARD SIEVE NOS. 3" 314" NO.4 NO.16 NO.40 NO.200 10 1 0.1 0.01 Gravel Sand Silt and Clay Coarse Fine Coarse Medium Fine Grain Size, mm ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Date Sampled Project Project No. Soil Description 1/2/14--1/3/14 Federal Way HS KE120504A Various Tested By Location EB/EP No. Depth MS Onsite Sample ID EB1-2.5' EB1-5' EB1-10' EB2-2.5' EB2-5' EB2-10' Wet Weight + Pan 172.4 393.1 162.2 269.6 301.0 347.4 Dry Weight + Pan 168.5 370.5 160.0 234.7 291.0 336.2 Weight of Pan 100.5 101.3 100.8 98.3 97.8 100.9 Weight of Moisture 4.0 22.6 2.2 34.8 10.0 11.1 Dry Weight of Soil 68.0 269.2 59.3 1-36.4 193.2 235.3 % Moisture 5.8 8.4 3.7 25.5 5.2 4.7 Sample ID EB3-2.5' EB3-5' EB3-10' EB3-15' EB4-5' EB4-10' Wet Weight + Pan 220.3 395.6 449.2 343.5 456.1 381.0 Dry Weight + Pan 204.9 358.1 413.8 308.4 364.1 344.1 Weight of Pan 100.8 100.7 100.9 99.7 100.0 100.4 Weight of Moisture 15.3 37.5 35.4 35.0 92.0 36.9 Dry Weight of Soil 104.2 257.4 312.9 208.7 264.2 243.7 % Moisture 14.7 14.6 11.3 16.8 34.8 15.1 Sample ID EB4-15' EB5-2.5' EB5-5' EB5-10' EB5-15' EB6-2.5' Wet Weight + Pan 387.8 365.4 348.7 253.7 454.8 320.1 Dry Weight + Pan 371.1 313.3 308.1 240.2 435.5 287.5 Weight of Pan 98.7 98.1 97.8 101.3 101.2 101.0 Weight of Moisture 16.8 52.1 40.6 13.6 19.2 32.5 Dry Weight of Soil 272.4 215.3 210.3 138.9 334.4 186.5 % Moisture 6.2 24.2 19.3 9.8 5.8 17.4 Sample ID EB6-5' EB7-2.5' EB7-5' EB7-10' Wet Weight + Pan 458.2 202.2 304.7 304.5 Dry Weight + Pan 427.8 195.8 282.2 281.3 Weight of Pan 99.2 99.2 97.8 98.3 Weight of Moisture 30.4 6.4 22.5 23.3 Dry Weight of Soil 328.6 96.6 184.4 183.0 % Moisture 9.3 6.6 12.2 12.7 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 42M27-5424 Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. leiLd Date Sampled Project Project No. 1/2/14--1/3/14 Federal Way HS KE120504A Tested By Location EB/EP No. MS Onsite Depth Moisture Content ASTM D 2216 Soil Description Sample ID EB8-2.5' EB8-5' EB8-10' EB8-15' EB9-5' EB9-7.5' Wet Weight + Pan 395.9 358.6 387.2 480.1 361.6 354.8 Dry Weight + Pan 369.2 327.8 353.6 457.4 306.8 314.1 Weight of Pan 101.3 100.5 10.9 100.7 100.7 101.0 Weight of Moisture 26.7 30.9 33.6 22.7 54.8 40.7 Dry Weight of Soil 268.0 227.3 342.7 356.7 206.0 213.2 % Moisture 10.0 13.6 9.8 6.4 26.6 19.1 Sample ID EB9-10' EB9-12.5' EB9-15' EB9-20' EB10-2.5' EB10-5' Wet Weight + Pan 356.8 419.2 515.5 266.8 317.0 348.4 Dry Weight + Pan 305.6 370.8 467.3 249.8 284.7 317.2 Weight of Pan 99.9 100.4 98.1 98.7 99.8 100.7 Weight of Moisture 51.2 48.4 48.2 17.0 32.4 31.3 Dry Weight of Soil 205.7 270.4 369.2 151.0 184.9 216.5 % Moisture 24.9 17.9 13.1 11.2 17.5 14.4 Sample ID EB10-7.5' EB10-10' EB10-15' EB10-20' Wet Weight + Pan 367.2 380.1 508.7 409.5 Dry Weight + Pan 334.4 348.7 473.0 365.9 Weight of Pan 99.9 99.7 99.2 97.8 Weight of Moisture 32.8 31.4 35.7 43.6 Dry Weight of Soil 234.5 249.0 373.8 268.2 % Moisture 14.0 12.6 9.5 16.2 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. 911 5th Ave., Suite 100 Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-7701 FAX 425-827-5424 ♦* HEATH & ASSOCIATES INC Transportation and Civil Engineering FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS City of Federal Way, WA Mb � - �loNAL $r Prepared for: Jesse Ahlberg Greene Gasaway Architects PO Box 4158 Federal Way, WA 98063 RECEIVED MAR 10 2014 CM OF FEDERAL. WAY FEBRUARY 2014 Cos 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup WA 98371 (253) 7701401 Fax (253) 770 1473 heathtraffic.com FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction..................................................................................................................3 II. Project Description.......................................................................................................3 III. Existing Conditions......................................................................................................3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions..........................................................................................13 V. Conclusions and Mitigation........................................................................................22 Appendix LIST OF TABLES 1. Existing AM Peak Hour LOS.....................................................................................11 2. Existing Afternoon Peak Hour LOS...........................................................................11 3. Existing PM Peak Hour LOS.....................................................................................12 4. 2019 AM Peak Hour LOS..........................................................................................20 5. 2019 Afternoon Peak Hour LOS................................................................................21 6. 2019 PM Peak Hour LOS...........................................................................................21 LIST OF FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map & Roadway System................................................................................4 2. Site Plan........................................................................................................................5 3. Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes................................................................................7 4. Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes......................................................................8 5. Existing 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes..........................................................................9 6. AM Peak Hour Redistributed School Trips...............................................................14 7. Afternoon Peak Hour Redistributed School Trips......................................................15 8. 4-6 PM Peak Hour Redistributed School Trips ...................................... 16 9. 2019 AM Peak Hour Volumes With Project........................ ......................................17 10. 2019 Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes With Project ....................................................18 11. 2019 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project........................................................19 2 FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS I. INTRODUCTION This study serves to investigate traffic impacts related to the Federal Way High School replacement project. The main goals of this study focus on the assessment of existing traffic conditions and intersection congestion, forecasts of distribution of the project trips, and estimations of future intersection delay. The first task includes the collection of general roadway information, road improvement information, entering sight distance data, and peak hour traffic counts. Next, a detailed level of service analysis of the existing volumes is made to determine the present degree of intersection congestion. Forecasts of future traffic and dispersion patterns on the surrounding street system are then determined. Following this forecast, the future service levels for the key intersections are investigated. As a final step, appropriate conclusions and possible off -site mitigation measures are defined. IT PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project replaces the existing Federal Way High School, located at 30611 16th Avenue S, with a new building and layout to provide a better learning environment and updated facilities. Student capacity is to remain the same, at approximately 1600 students. The inbound and outbound access points to the southeast lot (Lot C) on S 308th Street are to be removed along with that parking lot. There is to be one main parking lot, accessible from the existing access at S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S, as well as a new main north access that will be located at the existing driveway location (currently blocked) on the east side of the practice field. The current north access at S 304th Street & 16th Avenue S will remain in use with much of the volumes redistributed to the new north access. The S 308th Street & 14th Avenue S access intersection. Surrounding development is mostly residential, with some retail use as well as a church. For traffic analysis purposes, a 5 year horizon was assumed for a future analysis year of 2019. Figure 1 on the following page shows the project location and the local street network. The proposed site plan showing the overall site layout is shown in Figure 2. III. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Surrounding Roadway System Roadways serving the proposed site consist mostly of local roads that vary in width, terrain, and posted speeds. As indicated by their specific arterial designations, these roadways also vary in their overall function as part of the general network. The nearest N li'TTITTB11Mr1Tl-'l III FpjE oil III{B1GJ]Ilfl.l-l1.fl°P,y`IllilllFLiIL�F• —_ �Trrm refit n fre t rri rr.��'_ rrmlellf Tl�' y �. dr•� Jill 11?ITI7Fl�if MiiT5� '' i'I; lkllrgll.l111f.1�.�j'171luts.B ,� -� i` j"� . '{`� LL�r' `� ��sTi{[iii?il'..IN Fl:i�i19111LifFl,tal�i Lk k, Ila �j II � _ `{�� • lI11111111II11111iiiHiI11111 { I llll I I I III � y / •• t'• IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • -�� .--. • L 3 FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC Transportation and Civil Engineering SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 5 major route is Pacific Highway, located east of the project. The key streets near the site are described below. S 304th Street is a two-lane, east -west roadway that borders the north side of the site. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Lanes are 11 feet, with paved shoulders of up to 4 feet in width. A speed hump is installed along the school frontage to the west. S 308th Street is a two-lane, north -south roadway that borders the southern edge of the site. The speed limit is 25 mph and pavement surfacing is comprised of asphalt concrete. Lane widths are roughly 11 feet, with paved shoulders 7-8 feet in width. A sidewalk is provided along the north side of the road to serve students. A short section of sidewalk is also provided on the south side of the road near the school. A crosswalk is provided at the intersection with 14th Avenue S. Pacific Highway S, or SR-99 is multi -lane, north -south roadway that borders the east side of the project. Lane widths are typically 12 feet and paving is asphalt concrete. Shoulders consist of curb, gutter, and sidewalks. HOV lanes are provided in both directions, as well as turn lanes at intersections. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. B. Existing Access Configuration As noted earlier, the existing main access for the north side of the school is at the intersection with 16th Ave S & S 304th St. This access also serves the school buses. A driveway is present on S 304th St a bit to the west, however this location is currently blocked. Parking Lot C, at the southwest of the site, as a pair of accesses on S 308th St for inbound and outbound trips. The main school access for the south side is at the intersection with 14th Ave S & S 308th St. There is also a pair of accesses on S 3,08th St to the west that serve the stadium parking lot. C. Existing Peak Hour Volumes Field data for this study was taken in November of 2013 to February of 2014 while school was in session. The bell schedule for the school is 7:25 AM and 2:05 PM. Traffic counts were performed to cover the school peak periods, with volumes collected from 7:00 to 8:00 AM for the morning peak, 1:45 to 2:45 PM for the afternoon peak. The evening peak period between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM was also targeted for analysis of the peak for background traffic. Counts focused on the existing project access points, as well as the nearby intersections of Pacific Hwy & S 304th St and Pacific Hwy & S 308th St. An internal count of the north access was made to separate school volumes from the 16th Ave S & S 304th St intersection count. Some adjustment was done to volumes at the 16th Ave S & S 304th St intersection to reconcile higher school volumes at the internal count during the 4-6 PM peak hour. Figures 3, 4, and 5 show the AM, afternoon, and evening PM peak volumes, respectively, for the key intersections studied. Turning movement count data can be found in the appendix. FEDERAL WAY NIGH SChOOL HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC EXISTING AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ® Transportation and Civil Engineering FIGURE 3 5 308TH 5T 145--- 10- 4-202 BLOCKED 5 304TH 5T l.I.i 48 19 26 6 10 95-* 3fOP 4-78 -47 \ 58 13 60 j FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL 14 12 27 I5J 1 r`�21 63--10 mP 4-46 19 56 7 118 53 L t #ft& HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC Transportation and Civil Engineering I .I� 19 16 \ 17J L 177 1 69-1110. BfOP 4-1 16 557 35 j ♦ 33 56--10- IVI 4-50 82t � 818 82 71 t 85 854 62 105 1 44 20--*-1 8 \- t ;24 109 846 26 EXISTING AFTERNOON PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 4 8 I N 5 306TH 5T 0 170 BLOCKED 5 304TH 5T_ FJ 10 10 5 79 --- 00- 1 14 IG4 5 41 15:2) FEDERAL WAY HIGH 5CHOOL A HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC IW Transportation and Civil Engineering 7 15 38 4—G7 52 �18 10 5 7 3 9 4 147-10- 159 33 1336 65 '\ 2GJ 63 27� 4—GO \�,t 83 949 121 t 81 102 135091 Jc.jj Lb��49 10-111. 4-15 �43 22 � 9T4 23 EX15TING 4-G PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 5 D. Level of Service Existing peak hour delays were determined through the use of the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. Capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS) which is an established measure of congestion for transportation facilities. LOS is defined for a variety of facilities including intersections, freeways, arterials, etc. A complete definition of level of service and related criteria can be found in the HCM. The methodology for determining the LOS at signalized intersections strives to determine the volume to capacity (v/c) ratios for the various intersection movements as well as the average control delay for those movements. Delay is generally used to measure the degree of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost time. Control delay, in particular, includes movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. Aside from the overall quantity of traffic, three specific factors influence signalized intersection LOS. These include the type of signal operation provided, the signal phasing pattern, and the specific allocation of green time. The methodology for determining the LOS at unsignalized intersections strives to determine the potential capacities for the various vehicle movements and ultimately determines the average total delay for each movement. Potential Capacity represents the number of additional vehicles that could effectively utilize a particular movement, which is essentially the equivalent of the difference between the movement capacity and the existing movement volume. Total delay is described as the elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Average total delay is simply the mean total delay over the entire stream. A number of factors influence potential capacity and total delay including the availability/usefulness of gaps. The range for intersection level of service is LOS A to LOS F with the former indicating the best operating conditions with low control delays and the latter indicating the worst conditions with heavy control delays. Detailed descriptions of intersection LOS are given in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. LOS results for the key intersections, along with 95th percentile queue lengths, can be found in Tables 1, 2, and 3 for the AM, afternoon, and PM peak hours. Calculations were made through the use of the Synchro 8 program, with a conversion of vehicle queue lengths to feet based on a 25 foot headway. Note that the westernmost accesses on S 308th St at the stadium parking lot showed little to no outbound turning movements, therefore no LOS analyses were performed at those locations. 10 TABLE 1 Existing AM Peak Level of Service Delays given in Seconds Per Vehicle Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay QueueDt 16th/304th/Access Stop Northbound C 15.4 48 Southbound C 24.2 40 Eastbound A 1.1 0 Westbound A 4.9 13 14th/308th/Access Stop Northbound C 24.7 53 Southbound C 23.1 30 Eastbound A 3.4 8 Westbound A 2.3 5 308th St/Exit Stop Southbound B 10.5 13 Pac Hwy/304th St Signal Eastbound B 18.1 99 Westbound C 22.1 119 Northbound B 10.3 194 Southbound A 8.1 78 Overall B 11.7 Pac Hwy/308th St Signal Eastbound C 21.1 108 Westbound B 10.7 30 Northbound A 9.9 177 Southbound A 7.8 83 Overall B 10.4 As shown in the table, delays are moderate in the LOS A to LOS C range for existing conditions during the AM peak hour. No significant queues were noted, with the possible exception of eastbound queues on S 308th St at Pacific Hwy at 108 feet potentially blocking the entrance to Lot C located roughly 78 feet from the eastbound approach stop bar. Eastbound queues on S 304th St at Pacific Hwy may be at 99 feet, however the main north access is located roughly 200 feet from the eastbound stop bar. TABLE 2 Existing Afternoon Peak Level of Service Delays given in Seconds Per Vehicle Intersection Control Geonzetl i, LOS Dela Queue(t) 16th/304th/Access Stop Northbound B 12.0 20 Southbound B 14.0 15 Eastbound A 1.2 0 Westbound A 3.3 5 14th/308th/Access Stop Northbound C 24.4 73 Southbound B 17.0 25 Eastbound A 0.9 3 Westbound A 2.8 5 308th St/Exit Stop Southbound A 9.8 5 11 Pac Hwy/304th St Signal Eastbound B 12.8 60 Westbound B 20.0 94 Northbound A 7.5 147 Southbound A 9.6 169 Overall A 9.6 Pac Hwy/308th St Signal Eastbound B 19.0 92 Westbound B 11.2 40 Northbound A 8.8 160 Southbound B 10.7 173 Overall B 10.6 Delays during the afternoon peak appear to be similar or somewhat less than during the morning peak hour. The applicable queues are mostly lower as well, with the exception of northbound queues on 14th Ave S, and southbound queues on Pacific Hwy at both intersections. TABLE 3 Existing PM Peak Level of Service Delays given in Seconds Per Vehicle Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay QuezieDt 16th/304th/Access Stop Northbound B 10.3 13 Southbound B 12.7 15 Eastbound A 0.8 0 Westbound A 2.8 3 14th/308th/Access Stop Northbound B 13.7 28 Southbound B 12.1 3 Eastbound A 0.6 0 Westbound A 1.9 3 308th St/Exit Stop Southbound B 10.0 3 Pac Hwy/304th St Signal Eastbound B 11.0 39 Westbound C 27.7 131 Northbound B 10.1 193 Southbound B 15.0 316 Overall B 13.9 Pac Hwy/308th St Signal Eastbound C 21.8 86 Westbound B 11.5 41 Northbound B 10.9 198 Southbound B 12.0 327 Overall B 12.1 Delays during the PM peak hour from 4-6 PM are also in the LOS A to LOS C range. Eastbound queues on S 304th St and S 308th St at the intersections with Pacific Hwy should be lower than during the afternoon peak hour. 12 E. Nonmotorist Activity Observations of pedestrian and bicycle activity were made at the key intersections during traffic counts and site visits. Heavy pedestrian volumes were noted during the morning and afternoon peak hours particularly at the 14th Ave S & S 308th St intersection, which provides 2 crosswalks. Pedestrian volumes during the 4-6 PM peak were much lower. Pedestrian volumes were shown to affect vehicle progression during the peaks, and were incorporated into the analysis. As noted previously, the adjacent roads currently have wide paved shoulders, with a sidewalk also along the north side of S 308th St. F. Sight Distance and Turning Movements An analysis of the existing access locations was made, along with the proposed main north access location. The AASHTO Green Book states that a 30 mph design speed has a minimum required entering sight distance of 335 feet. This minimum is met at all access locations. S 304th St and S 308th St have negligible horizontal curvature and little vertical curvature in the vicinity. IV. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. Trip Redistribution As noted in the project description, the proposed Federal Way High School building is to have the same capacity as the existing building, at 1600 students. Therefore no new trips are expected to be generated. However, the modification to the accesses would alter the turning movement volumes at the access intersections. The anticipated changes in project trips at the accesses are shown in Figures 6, 7, and 8 for the AM, afternoon, and PM peak hours. These figures shift existing turning volumes from Lot C to the southeast, which is to be removed, over to the main access at 14th Ave S & S 308th St. Much of these existing Lot C volumes are from drop offs, with high inbound and outbound trips during the AM peak hour. Also, the existing north access at 16th Ave S & S 304th St would continue to serve bus traffic, however most of the other school trips currently using this access would shift over to the new access just to the west on S 304th St. This analysis assumes two-thirds of project traffic at the north access would shift to the new access. The adjacent major intersections of Pacific Hwy at S 304th St and at S 308th St should be unaffected; these intersections were therefore not included in further analysis. Also, the accesses to the stadium parking lot would be unaffected and were also not included in further analysis. B. Roadway Improvements The most recent Six -Year Road Improvement Program indicates that 14th Ave S is to be improved with sidewalks and lighting from S 308th St to S 312th St, along with a mini 13 14 15 16 35 15 31 140� FI51 N (92--* ♦-62 13� trj'f5 14 39 105 5 308TH 5T 5 304TH 5T 1%, / 55 33 53 !15 41� 1 610 78-� 9POP ♦-32 ��tr�� 21 36 34 FEDERAL WAY HIGH 5CHOOL HEATH & ASSOCIATES, INC Transportation and Civil Engineering ACCESSES REMOVED V) 2019 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES WITH PROJECT FIGURE 9 17 18 19 roundabout at the intersection with S 308th St and the school's south access. The cost is listed at $360,000 with construction to start in 2014. C. Peak Hour Volumes For forecasting purposes, future traffic volumes for the year 2019 were targeted for a 5- year horizon. Future 2019 peak hour volumes with the project completed were based on applying a 2% annual growth rate to the through volumes on S 304th St and S 308th St, then applying the project trip redistributions. The 2% annual growth rate was based on the WSDOT Annual Traffic Report for 2012 showing mild increases in volume on Pacific Hwy. The resulting 2019 volumes with the project in place are shown in Figures 9, 10, and 11. D. Level of Service A level of service analysis was made of the future peak hour volumes with project generated trips included. This analysis again involved the use of the Synchro 8 program. LOS and 95th percentile queue results for 2019 traffic conditions are shown in Tables 4, 5, and 6. Only these access intersections are expected to see any changes from the project. TABLE 4 2019 AM Peak Level of Service Delays given in Seconds Per Vehicle Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay QueueDt 304th St/New Access Stop Northbound B 10.3 18 Westbound A 5.3 10 16th/304th/Access Stop Northbound B 12.6 13 Southbound C 16.2 25 Eastbound A 1.8 3 Westbound A 1.6 3 14th/308th/Access Stop Northbound E 39.1 83 Southbound F 61.8 143 Eastbound A 4.5 13 Westbound A 1.5 3 The AM peak hour volumes show LOS A to LOS C volumes for the access intersections on the north side of the school. The south access intersection at 14th Ave S & S 308th St show some high delays of LOS F for the southbound approach and LOS E for the northbound approach. These delays would be short duration, however, with the heaviest volumes occurring for the roughly 15 minute period leading up to the morning bell at 7:25 AM. Queues are expected to be roughly 3 to 6 vehicle lengths for the northbound and southbound approaches. Note that with removal of Lot C with its accesses, any eastbound queuing on S 308th St at Pacific Hwy is no longer an issue. 20 TABLE 5 2019 Afternoon Peak Level of Service Delays given in Seconds Per Vehicle Intersection Control Geome ry LOS D lay QueueDt 304th St/New Access Stop Northbound B 10.1 10 Westbound A 7.7 5 16th/304th/Access Stop Northbound B 11.3 8 Southbound B 12.7 13 Eastbound A 1.5 3 Westbound A 1.1 3 14th/308th/Access Stop Northbound D 27.7 83 Southbound C 20.2 45 Eastbound A 1.5 3 Westbound A 2.3 5 As shown in the table, delays and queues should be lower during the afternoon peak than during the AM peak. TABLE 6 2019 PM Peak Level of Service Delays given in Seconds Per Vehicle Intersection Control Geometry LOS Delay ueue t 304th St/New Access Stop Northbound A 9.4 8 Westbound A 2.6 3 16th/304th/Access Stop Northbound B 10.0 5 Southbound B 11.7 13 Eastbound A 1.1 0 Westbound A 0.9 0 14th/308th/Access Stop Northbound B 14.1 30 Southbound B 12.9 8 Eastbound A 0.7 0 Westbound A 1.7 3 4-6 PM peak hour delays with the project should be low at LOS A to LOS B, with little queuing. E. Left Turn Lane Warrants For this impact study, procedures described by WSDOT Design Manual (Exhibit 1310- 7a) were used to ascertain storage requirements at the new access on S 304th St. The results show that a left turn lane would not be warranted for traffic turning left onto the school during the critical AM peak hour. Other peak hours, with lower left turn volumes, would also not meet warrants. A left turn lane would also not be warranted on S 308th St at the project access. In addition, the proposed mini -roundabout configuration would 21 preclude the inclusion of a left turn lane at this location. Added width from left turn lanes would also increase crosswalk distances, which would negatively impact the high pedestrian volumes associated with schools. Refer to the appendix for the associated input values and nomograph. F. Parking Analysis The proposed Federal Way High School replacement is to provide roughly 630 parking stalls, exceeding the code requirement of approximately 320 stalls. V. CONCLUSIONS & MITIGATION The proposed Federal Way High School replacement project will provide a new building and facilities to provide better learning facilities. The same capacity of 1600 students is planned, with no net new trips to be generated. Site changes pertaining to traffic include the incorporation of a new main access on the north side of the site, with the existing north access at 16th Ave S & S 304th St remaining available for car use and bus traffic. The southwest parking lot (Lot C) with its entrance/exit pair is to be removed. The stadium parking and access configuration would not be significantly altered. A City of Federal Way project will add sidewalks and lighting to 14th Ave S, and modify the 14th Ave S & S 308th St intersection to a rotary configuration. Pedestrian volumes in the immediate vicinity are heavy during the morning and afternoon peak hours, as students walk to and from school. Pedestrian facilities generally in the form of crosswalks, sidewalks, and paved shoulders help mitigate impacts on vehicular traffic due to pedestrians. Moderate morning, afternoon, and PM peak hour volumes currently exist at the access intersections. The adjacent intersections of Pacific Hwy & S 304th St, and Pacific Hwy & S 308th St show mild to moderate delays during the study hours. This school replacement project is not expected to add or subtract any trips to Pacific Hwy intersections, however. Future 2019 volumes show some high delays of LOS E and F for the northbound and southbound approaches of 14th Ave S/Access at S 308th St during the AM peak hour, however these delays would occur during a roughly 15 minute spike before the start of school. Future afternoon and PM peak hour delays should be mild at LOS D or better. Left turn lanes would not be met at the access intersections. Based on the above, the only potential mitigation may be frontage improvements or right- of-way work on sidewalks along S 304th Street or S 308th Street. 22 FEDERAL WAY HIGH SCHOOL REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX 23 LEVEL OF SERVICE The following are excerpts from the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual - Transportation Research Board Special Report 209. Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service (LOS) is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six LOS are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each level, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating conditions and the driver's perception of those conditions. Level -of -Service definitions The following definitions generally define the various levels of service for arterials. Level of service A represents primarily free -flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are seldom impeded in their ability to maneuver in the traffic stream. Delay at signalized intersections is minimal. Level of service B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free -flow speed for the arterial classification. The ability to maneuver in the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and delays are not bothersome. Level of service C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the average free -flow speed for the arterial classification. Level of service D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in approach delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free -flow speed. Level of service E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of one- third the free -flow speed or less. Such operations are caused by some combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. 24 Level of service F characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds, from less than one- third to one -quarter of the free -flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with long delays and extensive queuing. These definitions are general and conceptual in nature, and they apply primarily to uninterrupted flow. Levels of service for interrupted flow facilities vary widely in terms of both the user's perception of service quality and the operational variables used to describe them. For each type of facility, levels of service are defined based on one or more operational parameters that best describe operating quality for the subject facility type. While the concept of level of service attempts to address a wide range of operating conditions, limitations on data collection and availability make it impractical to treat the full range of operational parameters for every type of facility. The parameters selected to define levels of service for each facility type are called "measures of effectiveness" or "MOE's", and represent available measures that best describe the quality of operation on the subject facility type. Each level of service represents a range of conditions, as defined by a range in the parameters given. Thus, a level of service is not a discrete condition, but rather a range of conditions for which boundaries are established. The following tables describe levels of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of average control delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time, as well as time from movements at slower speeds and stops on intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of an intersection. Level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is determined for each minor movement. Signalized Intersections - Level of Service Control Delay per Level of Service Vehicle (sec) A <_10 B > 10 and :520 C >20 and :535 D > 35 and 555 E > 55 and <_ 80 F > 80 25 Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay per Vehicle (see). <_ 10 >10and _<15 >15and <_25 >25 and 535 > 35 and 550 > 50 As described in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, level of service breakpoints for all - way stop controlled (AWSC) intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from distinct kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an AWSC intersection. Thus a higher level of control delay is acceptable at a signalized intersection for the same level of service. AWSC Intersections - Level of Service Level of Service A B C D E F Average Total Delay per Vehicle sec <_ 10 >10and s15 > 15 and :525 > 25 and :535 > 35 and <_ 50 > 50 26 1 N x * * * x x * x * * x * * H I H H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I O H O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O W i N Z co N In m N dl N N O O O O O O O O O O O C to m m il) Ln 61 Ol m u"1 M H M 01 O M to l0 M to N IT to ❑ 1 ri N N r-I M M N N N M (q m tl) 1 W C7 FC H 1 ri to U I H x o * O * O x o * o * O x O * o * o O o 0 o 0 o O o o O o o z H I G H O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O (D O H w w I N ,Z O Lo t") N O o 0 m H r M O O O O O O O O of O O O z U 7 a w I J I 0 M l) O ri of In M N M A r-I O N M N T) rl O M N M �o N N (n N m O W al Ua H I 1] .4 Y� I oco I HH O O O O O o o 0 0 x o O o o O o o O O o O o 4U ao �] H I OH o O O o O O o 0 0 o to o o O O o o O o o O Ha 4 I N z r r M r N C' to m N N M O O O O O O O O O O U H ❑ I '.7 il) to M In of of In m N M of O m Ln rl N to of t, O I H N N H m m N N N In Z U O C7 I a I mtn * * x * * * * * * * ❑U W a W I o F 'J I O H o O O O O O o O O O O O o O o O O O o o O O O O O O O O Cl O o o 0 O o O 0 O o O to'D N ,Z N N t!) to to M In to M N M O O O O O O O O O O 40 r M Ln of of In m N M of O M N Cl N w m m O al co H N N H m m N N N m * t a Z H o wo H F WH C7 FC W H El H .] a Za O WH a Ua to a H z W aaw H x❑ E U w H 5a ow0 Hz HHa to H w a H H i-� U U to N N N N N N N N N 'J �+ �••) '� �""� `""� "'1 '""� '� "'1 "'� re '-1 '"+ N a 4 u)44PI F-4 W fC a U ❑ tail W ❑ . to H W a O Ln11 H as a to a H 0a o a❑ a Q H H H H z U .7 z O H to to to 2az� p❑ PW m El14 El N ❑ a z w HH U N O W a z a H H H W a W W FC a O a to z M c o D H to a J W a r H H O m N N O a O 54 ' Z W m G, ❑ to H U m M M a O 3 a 4 z z a c7 w co a w Z O z a ] W a H U-) O W x w to tl) to z H z U O a a R1 to H a >+ * * * a z O `.4 ❑ H U a 4 7+ * O a N F 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ a a x W > a O O ❑ O w ?� W ❑ 1 ❑ a ❑ Z O ❑ a to >+ FC ❑ a a' M N , to r-t; O FC O FC O H ] H H N O O F O a', 3 O 3 N a a IA z U S m a a a D Cl 4 to Z * 3 3 H O W W Z to W >C X X x 5 a H I Z O O * o a H El z a IA z a O * to > m * H G. to H H to In O to O O a w O * H w m N * 4 z z Z o is m O r ❑ a .-+ Lo x o .] r r .1 H Z N 4 4 e u-) o r rn O W .] a a m a m z a z a H H H in N x O H a a .] a ❑ ❑ H O O a H ❑ ❑ ❑ a U a 3 w w a to a H H O a a a a I7 m a to W W W w a w FC z cn a to V) .5: ry' U En to u) u) W H H F H r F r H m U U U H F F H H U H U z F H U U F U H U U h U U U m U m U m ID ID �D U U U U U ID U ID H 4 h h h h h h O h O h o h h 7 h h h o a a a a a o a o a o a a a a a a a a a a a L) a w O a W O a w a O w w W z w z w z O O O w w w w w O w O E- .] H 44 F Gl H Gr4 H H H H F G. kl a H H H H H Ga H w W k� W 44 W G+ W a w Gk W a w G. W W W W Cl G. G. Gl a W W W �4 FC o� FC o0 FC RI FC FC FCC FC E. FC 11 M CA M < FC Fe4 FC R1 FC W a a 0a 0a H tun w o H o o N c N H is 004 io r io c in o N c r r r W W w O d' 'o to N N of O N N Ln M N T r-I H r rl 10 01 M M HHa y' ❑ W O M M d' d' d' �f) to r W H N W H m W H N �n N N N a H 0,1 m M M M M M M M M FC O R' H R' O O O O O O O O O to a H N N N N N N N N N H O H N H o O O O O C. o O O O O U to cl) * * x * W 7 O a ❑ a a O w a a a a a a a a a o a E� F1 FC F4 FC FC < Fl� < F:� U to H r c) r m r c) r is r m r rn r rn r m r rn r m r rn m rn m rn is m m rn rn is is of rn o� rn m rn m m is rn to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463a Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Group FWHS LOC 1 IN FWHS LOC 1 OUT Southbound Northbound Start Time I Right Thru I Leh Right Thru I Factor 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0. 1.01 0700 AM 0 55 0 0 42 07:15 AM 0 95 0 0 87 07:30 AM 0 58 0 0 54 07:45 AM 0 15 0 0 22 Total 0 223 0 0 205 Grand Total 0 223 0 0 205 Apprch % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 Total % 0.0 52.1 0.01 0.0 47.9 FWH9 LOC t IN Out In 'Told! 205; 223 F-4-291 223 Thti North Kii�izaia ��aAo Anna �E 1 /20/2013 7:45:00 AM If 1 Thru 205 223 1 205 429 Out In Total 1.0 01 97 0 182 0 112 0 37 0 428 0 428 0.0 0.0 28 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463a i FWHS LOC 1 IN Southbound Start Time Right I Thruf Left r From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:00 AM Volume 0 223 0 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 07:15 Volume 0 95 0 Peak Factor High Int. 07:15 AM Volume 0 95 0 Peak Factor Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 FWHS LOC 1 OUT Northbound Total i Right Thru I Leftj App. Total 1 Int. Total 223 0 205 0 205 428 0.0 100.0 0.0 95 0 87 0 87 182 0.588 07:15 AM 95 0 87 0 87 0.587 0.589 FWHS LOG 1IN Out In Total 205 223 1 428 223 Thru North 11120120I3 7 00 00 Alin 11 /20/2013 7.45:00 AM G 1 Thru 205 7-2231 F 205 7 428 Out In Total FWMSL"l MT 29 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 Groups Printed- Group File Name : 3463b Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 FWHS LOC 1 IN FWHS LOC 1 OUT Southbound I Northbound Start Time Right Thru Left Right ! Thru LeZ Int, Total Factor 1.0 1.01 1.0. 1.0 1.0 , 1.0 101:45 PM 0 17 0' 0 4 0 21 Total 0 17 01 0 4 0 21 02:00 PM 0 31 0 0 54 0 85 02:15 PM 0 14 01 0 18 0 32 02:30 PM 0 9 0 0 12 0 21 Grand Total 0 71 0, 0 88 0 159 Apprch % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 44.7 0.0 0.0 55.3 0.0 FWHS LOC i IN Out In Total 88 — 71 1 159 71 Thru North i 1r�o1a 1:45�0 11 /20/2013 2:30:00 PM Grow 1 Thru ARI 71 88 7 159 Out In Total or 30 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 Intersection 01:45 PM Volume 0 71 0 71 0 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 02:00 Volume 0 31 0 31 0 Peak Factor High Int. 02:00 PM 02:00 PM Volume 0 31 0 31 0 Peak Factor 0.573 LOG I IN Out In Total 881 fj7 T 7 159 l 71 TITU North 11120/2013 L45:00 PM 1,/20/2013 2:30:00 PM Group 1 _ _ Thru 71 r 813 159 Ou[ In Total FINHR LOC i OUT File Name : 3463b Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 88 0 88 159 100.0 0.0 54 0 54 85 0.468 54 0 54 0.407 31 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463c Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Group 1 FWHS LOC 1 IN j FWHS LOc 1 OUT Southbound I Northbound Start Time Ri ht Thru I Left! Fright I Thru I Left Int. Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 04.00 PM 0 14 0 0 13 0 27 04:15PM 0 8 0 0 11 0 19 04:30 PM 0 5 0 0 8 0 13 04:45 PM 0 13 0 _ 0 12 0 25 Total 0 40 0 0 44 0 044 05:00 PM 0 18 0 0 25 0 43 05:15 PM 0 19 0 0 10 0 29 05:30 PM 0 26 0 0 25 0 51 05:45 PM 0 17 0 0 21 0 38 Total 0 80 0 T 0 81 0 161 Grand Total 0 120 0 0 125 0 245 Apprch % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 51.0 0.0 t IN Out Total _In l _ 26, ;_120 245 I �1_-_ 120Ti wu North 27 2013 4,0"0 PM 11/20/2013 5:45:00 PM ,C3fOklp 1 I Thru 125 120 21 5 F 245 Out In Total FWHSLOr 32 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 FW HS LOC 1 Southbound r From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 0 80 Percent 0.0 100.0 05:30 Volume 0 26 Peak Factor High Int. 05:30 PM Volume 0 26 Peak Factor File Name : 3463c Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 eft I A . Tot Al 1Right Thru Left App. Total . lnt. Total J 0 80 0 81 0 81 161 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0 26 0 25 0 25 51 0.789 05:00 PM 0 26 0 25 0 25 0.-1 0.810. 11N Out In Total 81�SQ� 161 1 w, I Thru North 111a012013 5:00:00 PM 11 /20/2013 5:45:00 PM G".p 1 T Thru s1 80 781 161 Out In Total FWH5 LOC 1 O11T 33 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 Printed- Cdoqp 1 FWHS LOC 2 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Start Time Right Thru Left Right TThru I Left Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:00 AM 1 0 3 15 23 0 07:15 AM 12 0 7 30 46 0 07:30 AM 15 0 21 5 32 0 07:45 AM 14 0 6 1 19 0 Totai 42 0 37 51 120 0 Grand Total 42 0 37 51 120 0 Apprch % 53.2 0.0 46.8 29.8 70.2 0.0 Total % 10.4 0-0 9.2 12.6 29.7 0.0 File Name : 3463d Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 308TH ST S Eastbound Right _ _Thru I Left Int. Total 1.01 1.0 1.0 0 30 1 73 0 39 9 143 0 19 26 118 0 22 8 70 0 110 441 "4134 0 110 44 404 0.0 71.4 28.6 0.0 27.2 10.9 2 Out In Total 95 _ 79 1 174 42� 37� Mghl Lett 4 4 p co b O North 1=Ml3 7D0M A�4 � 0 1/20/2013 7:45:00 AM 4, �'� NG 1 O �o �w 34 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463d Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 308TH ST S 308TH ST S FWHS LOC 2 Southbound Westbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:00 AM Volume 42 0 37 79 51 120 0 171 0 110 44 154 404 Percent 53.2 0.0 46.8 29.8 70.2 0.0 0.0 71.4 28.6 07:15 Volume 12 0 7 19 30 46 0 76 0 39 9 48 143 Peak Factor 0.706 High Int. 07:30 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM Volume 15 0 21 36 30 46 0 76 0 39 9 48 Peak Factor 0.549 0.563 0.802 Out In Total 79� 174 I'I 'j Rift left +I -► North r lag t Ll JM=.13 7:00:00 AM �!—�I� 1/20/2013 7:45:00 AM o rl 2Cr O� IIJf m- M, Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 GmTs Printed- Group 1 FWHS LOC 2 308TH ST S Southbound I Westbound Start Time Right Thru ` Left' Right I Thru 1 Left Factor] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 01:45 PM 4 0 4 4 27 0 Total 4 0 4 4 .V 0 02:00 PM 3 0 4 9 30 0 02:15 PM 10 0 8 3 26 0 02:30 PM 2 0 0 1 33 0 Grand Total 19 0 16 17 116 0 Apprch % 54.3 0.0 45.7 12.8 87.2 0.0 Total % 5.4 0.0 4.5 4.8 32.8 0.0 File Name : 3463e Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 308TH ST S Eastbound Right Thru I Left I Int. Total 1 1.0 1.01 1.0 0 49 4 92 0 49 4 92 0 49 2 97 0 47 6 100 0 24 5 65 0 169 17 354 0.0 90.9 9.1 0.0 47.7 4.8 2 Out In Total 35 1 69 4 om ? �o t• North + �� f �rs J" - L �1120=13IASM PM 2 11/20/2013 2:30:00 PM 1 c = Lo OT ao p1 36 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 FWHS LOC 2 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Start Time Right' Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Houck r From 01:45 PM to 02:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 01:45 PM Volume 19 0 16 35 17 116 0 Percent 54.3 0.0 45.7 12.8 87.2 0.0 02:15 Volume 10 0 8 18 3 26 0 Peak Factor High Int. 02:15 PM 02:00 PM Volume 10 0 8 18 9 30 0 Peak Factor 0.486 File Name : 3463e Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 308TH ST S I Eastbound Right I Thru Left T ptp-a Int. Total 133 0 169 17 I 186 354 0.0 90.9 9.1 29 0 47 6 53 100 0.885 01:45 PM 39 0 49 4 53 0.853 0.8771 Out In Total 341 F 69 I 19f TB, Mp Udl 4j 16 rNi O ~ c North µ 1112IXt2t}73145 PM n m F-1 y 1/20/2013 2:30:00 PM w g T W O w� m- 37 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463f Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Group 1 FWHS LOC 2 308TH ST S 308TH ST S ` Start Time Southbound Ri ht 1 Thru I Westbound Left: Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Eastbound I Thru i Left Int. Total Factor 1.0! 1.0! 1.0 _ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1. 0 1.0 ] 1.0 04:00 PM 2 0 1 0 32 01 0 40 4 79 04:15 PM 1 0 01 1 32 0 0 36 0 70 04:30 PM 0 0 1 1 3 40 0 0 31 1 76 04:45 PM 1 0 01 3 34 0 0 27 2 67 Total 4 0 21 7 138 0, 0 134 7 292 05:00 PM 2 0 5 1 29 0 0 32 0 69 05:15 PM 2 0 3 0 39 0 0 33 1 78 05:30 PM 1 0 0 0 41 0 0 46 1 89 05:45 PM 2 0 1 3 50 0 0 36 1 93 Total 7 0 9 4 159 0 0 147 3 329 Grand Total 11 0 11 11 297 0 0 281 10 621 Apprch % 50.0 0.0 50.0 3.6 96.4 0.0 0.0 96.6 3.4 Total % 1.8 0.0 1.8 1.8 47.8 0.0 0.0 45.2 1.6 2 Out in Total 21 -- 22 _ 1T 11 Right Left / F rn O� NO ~ N 71120/2ai3 4:00:00 @M — — -o N ?_ 11/20/20135:45:00 PM �� m c•�: 0 w do- 38 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 FWHS tOC 2 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Start Time Right I Thru Left Total Right I Thru Left ik Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM ---Peak I of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 7 0 9 16 4 159 0 Percent 43.8 0.0 56.3 2.5 97.5 0.0 05:45 Volume 2 0 1 3 3 50 0 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM 05:45 PM Volume 2 0 5 7 3 50 0 Peak Factor 0.571 File Name : 3463f Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No :2 Total ' Right I Thru Left Total Int. Total 163 0 147 3 150I 329 0.0 98.0 2.0 53 0 36 1 37 93 0.884 05:30 PM 53 0 46 1 47 0.769 0.798 FWHSLOC2 QA In Total 7 + 16J --7---91 Right Leff co � o CO O North ^� 1 il2W20t3 5:00%PM �` -2 1/20/2013 5:45:00 PM 4—VI w � O tO iC3tC110 1 �� w� m- 39 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463g Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Group 1 FWHS LOC 3 308TH ST S 14TH AVE S 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 1 Start Time Ri ht I Thru Ri ht Thru Left Right Thru Left Right ThruuLeft Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 _Left 1.0 1.0 1.0. 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 I 1.0 1.0 1.0 07,00 AM 1 4 2 14 10 11 13 5 1 2 18 14 95 07:15 AM 13 7 61 23 13 13 19 12 4 6 31 48 I 195 07:30 AM 12 8 8 17 17 16 12 4 4 10 23 22 153 07:45 AM 1 0 0 2 14 5 5 0 12 6 25 2 72 Total 27 19 [ 6 56 54 45 49 21 21 1 24 97 86 515 Grand Total 27 19 16 56 54 45 49 21 21 24 97 86 515 Apprch % 43.5 30.6 25.8 I 36.1 34.8 29.0 53.8 23.1 23.1 11.6 46.9 41.5 Total % 5.2 3.7 3.1 10.9 10.5 8.7 9.5 4.1 4.1 4.7 18.8 16.7 a Out In Total 163821 I 25 I l 19 1B Thu I 4 T �O J North _c C� ► j117202013 7 UaflO AM 2 jI 1/20/2013 7:45:00 AM p�04 2E Cr 4t.[011q 1 r- s Cnl w I Left Thru 141 M 211 21 49I 88 9.7 179- Out In Total 40 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 leak Hour From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peal; 1 of 1 Intersection 07:00 AM File Name : 3463g Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 Volume 27 19 16 62 56 54 45 155 49 21 21 91 24 97 86 207 Percent 43.5 30.6 25.8 36.1 34.8 29.0 53.8 23.1 23.1 11.6 46.9 41.5 07-15 13 7 6 26 23 13 13 49 19 12 4 35 6 31 48 85 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM Volume 12 8 8 28 17 17 16 50 19 12 4 35 6 31 48 85 Peak Factor 0.554 0.775 0.650 0.609 3 Out In Total 163 62: 225 I" TWU Lwt � 1 w rn H m � �O —`� °°La � l i12p12013 7�6 [iO AM �— � 3 111/20/2013 7:45:00 AMcr N V p r J �w r L 9 88 �9j1 179 Out In Total I Int. 515 195 0.660 41 FWHS LOC 3 Southbound Start Time Ri ht Thru I Factor 1.0 1.0 01:45 PM 2 0 Total 2 0 02:00 PM 29 13 02:15 PM 12 4 02:30 PM 5 2 Grand Total 48 19 Apprch % 51.6 20.4 Total % 9.6 3.8 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463h Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Group 1 308TH ST S 14TH AVE S 308TH ST S Westbound Northbound Eastbound Left Right Thru Left Right I Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total 1.0 1.0 1.0. 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 120 1 0 20 91 11 5 7 9 17 _ 4 85 1 0 20 91 11 5 7 9 17 4, 85 13 5 22 18 8 7 19 9 38 10' 191 6 4 14 11 15 1 16 5 21 1 110 6 1 22 9 26 0 16 8 19 it 115 26 10 78 47 60 13 58 31 95 16 501 ?8.0 7.4 57.8 34.8 45.8 9.9 44.3 21.8 66.9 11.3 5.2 2.0 15.6 9.41 12.0 2.6 11.6 6.2 19.0 3.2 H Out In Total 39 ._ __93 132 Hight Ttxkr Left I y f6 N O North la ni � CT 4'1 M ► ~ T1120120131A5.ODPM 11 /20/2013 2:30:00 PM " o Groups m ^ w a Ol � Letl 7Fw Flight 581 13.1 W 97 37 2 Out In Total 42 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 FWHS LOC 3 308TH ST S 14TH AVE,' Southbound Westbound Northbounc Start Time Right Thru App. Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Total . „LeftI Peak Hour From 01:45 PM to 02:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 01:45 PM Volume 48 19 26 93 10 78 47 135 60 13 58 Percent 51.6 20.4 28.0 7.4 57.8 34.8 45.8 9.9 44.3 02:00 29 13 13 55 5 22 18 45 8 7 19 Volume Peak Factor File Name : 3463h Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 308TH ST S Eastbound Right Thru Left App Int. Total Total 131 31 95 16 142 501 21.8 66.9 11.3 34 9 38 10 57 191 0.656 High Int. 02:00 PM 02:00 PM 02:30 PM 02:00 PM Volume 29 13 13 55 5 22 18 45 26 0 16 42 9 38 10 57 Peak Factor 0.423 0.750 0.780 0.623 Out _ In Total 39 93 132 481 19'. M Kg% live Leff 1 o M �0 Noth 1� N. nCf Li11/20/2013 1 A5MO PM �� TO 1 11/20/2013 2:30:00 PM �^. "Egg _Group 1 F T � f Uft Thru Ri lj I Sol 131 60! L97�a Out In Total 43 FWHS LOC 3 Southbound Start Time I Right Thru Factor ! 1.0 1.0 04.00 PM 3 4 04:15 PM 0 1 04:30 PM 1 2 04:45 PM 3 2 Total 7 9 05:00 PM 4 2 05:15 PM 1 2 05:30 PM 1 2 05:45 PM 4 4 ToM1 10 10 Grand Total 17 19 Apprch % 32.7 36.5 Total % 2.1 2.3 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463i Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Group 1 308TH ST S 14TH AVE S 308TH ST S Westbound Northbound Eastbound Left . Right Thru I Left Ri ht Thru I Left Ri ht Thru Left Int. Total 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0' 1.01.0 1.01 4 0 31 9 16 2 11 6 18 21 106 0 0 23 11 10 1 21 4 23 2 96 5 1 26 19 17 0 14 7 12 1. 105 2 2 24 8 10 2 15 6 21 3, 98 11 3 104 47 53 5 61 23 74 81 405 2 1 24 8 11 0 18 7 18 3 98 0 2 24 8 10 1 14 2 17 0 81 1 2 31 13 16 2 12 7 18 0, 105 2 3 35 12 15 2 20, 7 26 5 135 51 8 114 41 52 5 64 I 23 79 8 419 16 11 218 881 105 10 125 46 153 16 824 30.8 3.5 68.8 27.81 43.8 4.2 52.1 21.4 71.2 7.4 1.9 1.3 26.5 10.7 12.7 1.2 15.2 5.6 18.6 1.9 out In Total 37 52i 1 89 `Hight T u Left 1- L+ o� - �0 V.C.. North A N um 2 -� .11120CZ013 4:Q0 100 PM 1 :� 1/20/2013 5:45:00 PM W ice. ff O- r coo � mCc LBlt Thru Rkh 125.' TQ 1 153 240 393 Out ]n Total 44 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463i Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No :2 FWHS LOC 3 308TH ST S j 14TH AVE S 308TH 51 5 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left APP. Total Right Thru Left APP Total Right I Thru f Left APP' Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM • Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM I Volume 10 10 5 25 8 114 41 163 52 5 64 121 23 79 8 110 419 Percent 40.0 40.0 20.0 4.9 69.9 25.2 43.0 4.1 52.9 20.9 71.8 7.3 05:45 4 4 2 10 3 35 12 50 15 2 20 37 7 26 5 38 135 Volume Peak Factor 0.776 High Int. 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM 05:45 PM Volume 4 4 2 10 3 35 12 50 15 2 20 37 7 26 5 38 Peak Factor 0.625 0.815 0.818 0.724 FWHS LOC 3 Ou[ In TOW 21 25 46 10 1n 5 Righi T" Left 61 y �0 J North O1 n_= ` 2� tl2am.35:00:00 a. G 1 /20/20, 3 5:45:00 PM aoF- nil v t f Left Thru RIAN 64 5 52' I 1 I 74 1 127i 195 OW in Total Vr 45 Heath & Associates, Inc 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463j Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Group 1 _ FWHS LOC 4&5 308TH ST S 306TH ST S Southbound Westbound Eastbound Start Time . Right Thru I Left Ri ht Thru Left Ri ht Thru 1 Left I~ Int. Total Factor 1.0 .- 1.0 1.0 , 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 A 1.01 1.01 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 37 0' 48 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 81 0 118 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 42 0 74 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 31 0 58 Total 0 0 01 0 107 0 0 191 0 298 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 191 0 298 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 0.01 0.0 64.1 0.0 FWHS LOC 495 Out In Total _ 7-01 1-- 0' 0 0. Q Right Leff w p N O _ North- r. c - 7 Qi L - - 1la=13 7:00:00 0 5 O rn '" ► 11 /20/2013 7:45:00 AM - o O� Group 2 p$ o ao - 46 Southbound Start Time Right Thru Left tk Flour From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Pez Intersection 07:00 AM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 07:15 Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 6:45:00 AM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 308TH ST S Westbound APp- Ri ht' g Thru Left Total. 1 0� 0 107 0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0 0 37 0 07:15 AM 0 0 37 0 File Name : 3463j Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 Eastbound Right Thru Left Int. Total Total Total . 107 0 191 0 I 191 298 0.0 100.0 0.0 37 0 81 0 81 118 0.631 07:15 AM 37 0 81 0 81 0.723 0.590 4& Out In Total 0 n: 0 Right Led' 4-1 -► 1 p N �0 North �LI yJ — JICi S12Ur2[113 70aW AM ,p'S as t� 1/20/2013 7:45:00 AM 4— o I qLa-up 1 �0 O T o �w 47 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463k Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Group 1 FWHS LOC 4&5 308TH ST S 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Eastbound Start Time Ri hg t j Thru Left Right I Thru I Left 1 Right Thru Left Int. Total Factor _ 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 _ 1.0 1.01 1.0 01:45. PM 0 0 01 0 28 0 0 30 0 58 Total 0 0 01 0 28 0 0 30 0 58 02:00 PM 0 0 1 0 85 0 0 58 0 144 02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 44 0 0 28 0 72 02:30 PM 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 29 0 74 Grand Total 0 0 1 0 202 0 0 145 0 348 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Total % 00 0.0 0.3 0.0 58.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 0.0 1FW HS LOC 4&5 Out In Total 0 l Right Left 4 om �o North h_. RiiJ 1A U0 a a r11/20/2013 2,30*00 PM 2—; � , 0 N A N 6] - 48 Southbound Start Time I Right Thru Left O �ip� 01:45 PM to 02:30 PM - Pes Intersection 01:45 PM Volume 0 0 1 Percent 0.0 0.0 100.0 02:00 Volume 0 0 1 Peak Factor High Int. 02:00 PM Volume 0 0 1 Peak Factor Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 308TH ST S Westbound App' Ri ht g Thru Left Total fi 1 0 202 0 0.0 100.0 0.0 1 0 85 0 02:00 PM 1 0 85 0 0.250 l File Name : 3463k Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 308TH ST S Eastbound App. Right Thru Left APP' Int. Total Total Total I 202 0 145 0 145 348 0.0 100.0 0.0 85 0 58 0 58 144 0.604 02:00 PM 85 0 58 0 58 0.594 0.625 a Out Iq Total _ 0 i 01 1i Right Left L* i 6 C �O 0.= - _� T1120120131A&CO PM l 1 /20/2013 2:30:OO PM — o — Nf C7 F" jO N �1 N � 0 A N O] - 49 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 34631 Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Group t FWHS LOC 4&5 308TH ST S 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Eastbound Start Time Right; Thru I Left Right. Thru Left _ Right I Thru Left Int. Total Factorl 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 2 0 0 1 41 0 0 24 1 69 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 29 0 60 04:30 PM 1 0 0 0 40 0 0 16 0 57 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 35 0 76 Total 3 0 0 1 153 0 .0 104 1 262 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 46 0 0 20 0 66 05:15 PM 0 0 0 1 37 0 0 21 0 59 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 23 0 63 05.45 PM 0 0 0 5 47 0_ 0 34 1 87 Total 0 0 01 6 170 0 0 93 1 275 Grand Total 3 0 01 7 323 0 0 202 2 537 Apprch % 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 97.9 0.0 0.0 99.0 1.0 Total % 0.6 0.0 0.01 1.3 60.1 0.0 0.0 37.6 0.4 out In Total S 3' 12 Mghl Left CO o LO .. 0 N N North 11 34.00:00 PM L"K�} 11 /20/2013 5:45:00 PM uGroup o �-� IL'J'I w� N 50 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 FWHS LOC 4&5 308TH ST S = i Southbound Westbound Start Time Right Thru Left PP Total Right I Thru Left Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 6 170 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 96.6 0.0 05:45 Volume 0 0 0 0 5 47 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM 05:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 5 47 0 Peak Factor File Name : 34631 Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 11 /20/2013 Page No : 2 308TH ST S Eastbound App-Int. Total App. t Right Thru Left Total I Total J 176 0 98 1 99 275 0.0 99.0 1.0 52 0 34 1 35 87 0.790 05:45 PM 52 0 34 1 35 0.846 0.707 EZZ az� Out In Total �7 0 17 0Rift 0 4-1 rn � oN �O North t1$0I2f1t 3 5970Ao P>va 2 11/20/2013 5:45:00 PM �_ 1 6 r� � O1 .C3rouQ 7 �o Ay 51 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 rlrniira PrinfM- I InchiffPd 16TH AVE S Southbound 304TH S- 8 Westbound I 16TH AVE S I Northbound StartTime Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Right 1 Thru Le Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1. 07.00 AM 07:15 AM [3 20 2 10 7 6 5 9 7 12 38 54 34 8 35 13 File Name : 3463m Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/13/2014 Page No :1 304TH ST S Eastbound 07:30 AM 0 11 7 19 14 42 37 17 8 10 24 7 196 07:45 AM 3 4 11 12 12 14 10 4 3 5 16 5 99 Total 5 45 31 43 47 148 116 42 16 38 57 16 604 Grand Total 5 45 31 43 47 148 116 42 16 38 57 16 604 Apprch % 6.2 55.6 38.31 18.1 19.7 62.2 66.7 24.1 9.2 34.2 51.4 14.4 Total % 0.8 7.5 5.1 7.1 7.8 24.5 19.2 7.0 2.6 6.3 9.4 2.6 16THAVr_S Out rn TOM 101 fs3 182 5 45 $1 Right Thru Left mr North a' a 2li3r20?A 7:00:00 AM 2A 3/2014 7:45:00 AM t m� Llnshifted O N - Left Thru Right I I 231 405 ^.174_ Out In Total 16TH Ayr Iq 52 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463m Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/13/2014 Page No : 2 16TH AVE S Southbound 304TH ST S Westbound 16TH AVE S Northbound 304TH ST S Eastbound Start Time Right � Thru Left App Right Thru Left APpl Right Thru Left I APpl Right Thru Left I Total Ina. Total Total Total Total Total. ota _ Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM --Peak 1 of t Intersection 07:00 AM Volume 5 45 31 81 43 47 148 238 116 42 16 174 38 57 16 111 604 Percent 6.2 55.6 38.3 18.1 19.7 62.2 66.7 24.1 9.2 34.2 51.4 14.4 07:30 0 11 7 18 19 14 42 75 37 17 8 62 10 24 7 41 196 Volume Peak Factor 0.770 High Int. 07:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:30 AM Volume 0 20 7 27 19 14 42 75 37 17 8 62 10 24 7 41 Peak Factor 0.750 0.793 0.702 0.677 I I HAVES out In Total F-1011 7"si I` C5• 45 3T1 Flight Thru Left 4i °^ O ?2. North �I c nz--4 ?/13120147:00:e10AM 2113=14 7:45:00 AM r On Unsh}fted sv +1 T F+ Left Thru I ht j 16L 42 1116 L 7 231 17 405 Out In Total 53 Total 02:00 PM 02:15 PM 02:30 PM Grand Total Apprch % Total % 16TH AVE S Southbound light 1.0 1.0 3 3 3 3 4 4 2 3 5 2 14 12 26.4 22.6 3.8 3.3 1.0 9 3 7 5 6 27 50.9 7.3 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 .0 1 In 10 6 9 4 29 22.1 7.9 10 14 12 10 46 35.1 12.5 s Printed- Unshifted S V 16TH AVE S d I Northbound Left Right IThru 1.0 1.01 1.0 19 3 1 19 3 1 21 27 11 9 12 5 7 11 1 56 53 18 42.7 60.2 20.5 15.2 14.4 4.9 File Name : 3463n Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/12/2014 Page No :1 304TH ST S i Eastbound Left Ri ht Thru Left' Int. Total 1.01 1.01 1.0 1 1.0 11 4 9 2 74 1 4 9 2; 74 9 11 29 6 149 5 4 13 4 83 2 0 12 3 63 17 19 63 15 369 19.3 19.6 64.9 15.5 4.6 5.1 17.1 4.1 16TH av out 22 i 93C Total 14: 1227 �ht `+ 1 - ._..^ J-- North L-c m �1 0 211?J20141*45:00 PM 1--- 17212014 2:30:00 PM p ;,r 4 7 o[ cc lhlshifted �-i w A - Left Thru Right 17' 181 53o- 87 175 Out In Total 54 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 16TH AVE S 304TH ST ; Southbound W estbounc Start Time Right Thru Left I App. Right Thru Left I Total bak Hour From 01:45 PM to 02:30 PM - Peak f of 1 Intersection 01:45 PM Volume 14 12 27 53 29 46 56 Percent 26.4 22.6 50.9 22.1 35.1 42.7 02:00 4 4 7 15 6 14 21 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 01:45 PM 02:00 PM Volume 3 3 9 15 6 14 21 Peak Factor 0.883 File Name : 3463n Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/12/2014 Page No : 2 16TH AVE S 304TH ST S Northbound Eastbound Right Thru Left Right Thru Left otal Total Total Total 1 131 53 18 17 I 88 19 63 15 97 369 60.2 20.5 19.3 19.6 64.9 15.5 41 27 11 9 47 11 29 6 46 149 0.619 02:00 PM 02:00 PM 41 27 11 9 47 11 29 6 46 0.799 0.468 0.527 Out In Total 62 1 53 1 115 i ,4: 121 27 Right Thru Len 4-1L4 North 21i�l2014145 OD rm 2117_ I4 2:30:00 PM Urah fled 4-] F-► Left rThiouT8775 Out In Total fsTH AVE s 55 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463o Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 12/5/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-.Unshifted 16TH AVE S 304TH ST S 16TH AVE S 304TH ST S Southbound I Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right 1 Thru I Left i Right I Thru I eft Right I Thru Left 1 Ri9ht Thru Left Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0! I.OT 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 2 3 11 ' 5 16 14 15 4 7 3 12 1 93 04:15 PM 2 5 8 f 3 17 4 9 2 2 0 4 1 57 04:30 PM 3 0 14 7 22 5 7 0 1 2 5 1 67 04:45 PM 0 1 5 6 12 4 4 1 2 0 11 2 48 Total 7 9 38 21 67 27 35 7 12 5 32 51 265 05:00 PM 2 2 5 10 14 1 5 0 3 3 10 01 55 05:15 PM 2 0 5 6 13 4 2 1 0 1 7 2 43 05:30 PM 4 1 8 6 6 14 5 2 3 1 9 1 60 05:45 PM 2 1 9 5 17 6 3 2 1 3 9 4 62 Total 10 4 27 27 50 25 15 5 7 8 35 7 220 Grand Total 17 13 65 48 117 52 50 12 19 13 67 12 485 Apprch % 17.9 13.7 68.4 22.1 53.9 24.0 61.7 14.8 23.5 14.1 72.8 13.0 Total % 3.5 2.7 13.4 9.9 24.1 10.7. 10.3 2.5 3.9 2.7 13.8 2.5 Out In Total 72 ® 167 �t 17� 13; 651 1Tru I. -FIR 0 •r. �J North N� -_ - -► 1V5120134�Ot0O Put f -2 - N - t 2/5/2013 5:45:00 PM `+ m r O M L -9-. T UnstMed �m �„^ r" K) W 0 Left Thru 191 12 78 81 159 Out 16 Total 56 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463o Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 12/5/2013 Page No : 2 16TH AVE S Southbound 304TH ST S Westbound 16TH AVE S Northbound 304TH 5T 5 Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left 1 'PP' Total Right Thru Left Right Thru Right Total , Left APP ' Total Right I Thru I Left APP• Total t Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:00 PM Volume 7 9 38 54 21 67 27 115 35 7 12 54 5 32 5 42 265 Percent 13.0 16.7 70.4 18.3 58.3 23.5 64.8 13.0 22.2 11.9 76.2 11.9 04:00 2 3 11 16 5 16 14 35 15 4 7 26 3 12 1 16 93 Volume Peak Factor 0.712 High Int. 04:30 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM Volume 3 0 14 17 5 16 14 35 15 4 7 26 3 12 1 16 Peak Factor 0.794 0.821 0.519 0.656 16TH AVE S Out In Total 33 54 87 i 7 9 381 aghl Thru LeftI 4•_I L F ON � r LA ` �� �� - ---- North FE —i 12f5+20134:00 Oa Ph! �. w 12/512013 4:45:00 PM v O m Unshltted 4� F+ Left Thru MOM 12 7 351 I 41 54� F 95 Out In Total I AV 57 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463p Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/12/2014 Page No : 1 Graff. Printed- Unshifted PACIFIC HWY 304TH STD PACIFIC HWY 304TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Ri ht Thru Left Right I Thru t Left Right Thru I Leftl Right Thru Leftj Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 07:00 AM 17 73 12 7 17 18 6 207 161 7 13 15 408 07:15 AM 38 101 3 4 30 16 7 242 22 15 17 28 523 07:30 AM 24 133 10 10 28 17 16 273 14 20 24 23 592 07:45 AM 5 123 14 18 23 14 7 217 18 11 13 16 479 Total 84 430 39 39 98 65 36 939 70 53 67 82 2002 Grand Total 84 430 39 39 98 65 36 939 70 53 67 82 2002 Apprch % 15.2 77.8 7.1 19.3 48.5 32.2 3.4 89.9 6.7 26.2 33.2 40.6 Total % 4.2 21.5 1.9 1.9 4.9 3.2 1.8 46.9 3.5 2.6 3.3 4.1 II Y Out In Total 1060 _ 531 1613 B4 4q 3.9. Righi Thru Letl ! 1 T F A� 0 WA �J NO th a ra' I GIN! - N 2 c-� ?J171201Q7- y ..- o - ?l1212014 7:45:00 AM a O N m� = S Ins171Rfld� x n--i a w F+ Let[ Thru ilam 701 939 36 548 1045 1593 Out I n Total 58 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463p Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/12/2014 Page No : 2 PACIFIC HWY 304TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 304TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru Left App. Right I Thru Left I App' Right Thru Left APP' Right Thru Left App. Total Total Total Total Peak Hour t-rom u/:Uu AM to ui.4o Am - h'eaK 1 or 1 Intersection 07:00 AM Volume 84 430 39 553 39 98 65 Percent 15.2 77.8 7.1 19.3 48.5 32.2 07:30 24 133 10 167 10 28 17 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 07:30 AM 07:30 AM Volume 24 133 10 167 10 28 17 Peak Factor 0.828 Int. Total 202 36 939 70 I 1045 53 67 82 202 2002 3.4 89.9 6.7 26.2 33.2 40.6 55 16 273 14 303 20 24 23 67 592 0.845 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 55 16 273 14 303 20 24 23 67 0.918 0.862 0.754 PACIFIC HV" Out in Total �0-67�OF�-1-61-31 4-I L I 16a �O J North rill T12J20147:00:00A1VI 4— J12/2014 7:45:00 AM o N L°-'� Unshifted r —I -� ¢ w inn WE r 1,,4 Thru R 7OI s39 98I I ® Im 1593 Out In Total 59 PACIFIC HWY Southbound Start Time Ri htI Thru Left Factor 1.01 1.0 1.0 01:45 PM 5 214 7 Total 5 214 7 02:00 PM 15 213 4 02:15 PM 8 203 12 02:30 PM 2 257 12 Grand Total 30 887 35 Apprch % 3.2 93.2 3.7 Total % 1.3 39.6 1.6 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 Groups Printed- Unshifted 304TH ST S PACIFIC HWY Westbound Northbound Right Thru Left Riaht Thru 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5 18 20 21 208 5 18 20 21 208 10 9 17 16 194 8 12 19 25 226 10 11 29 20 190 33 50 85 82 818 19.6 29.8 50.6 8.4 83.3 1.5 2.2 3.8 3.7 36.5 File Name : 3463q Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/12/2014 Page No : 1 304TH ST S Eastbound Left Right I Thru Left Int. Total 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 23 10 3 8 542 23 10 3 8 542 23 17 33 19 570 18 8 11 8 558 18 11 9 3 572 82 46 56 38 2242 8.4 32.9 40.0 27.1 3.7 2.1 2.5 1.7 A I i Out In Total 1 889 ....952-1 1841 301 8871 361 Right Thru Left O L41J North ` .y�� .ec.nn pia I F L�I 1 2LY141:45:00 PM ,2 '~ ?ff?J20142:30:00 PM O� I Left Thru RI hE 1 821 87 821 i 1018 982 F2000 Out In Total 60 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463q Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/12/2014 Page No : 2 PACIFIC HWY 304TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 304TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right 1 Thru Left �_ App' Total Right Thru�Left App' Total Right Thru 1 Left App' Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total . Peak Hour From 01:45 PM to 02:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 _ Intersection 01:45 PM Volume 30 887 35 952 33 50 85 168 82 818 82 982 46 56 38 140 2242 Percent 3.2 93.2 3.7 19.6 29.8 50.6 8.4 83.3 8.4 32.9 40.0 27.1 02:30 2 257 12 271 10 11 29 50 20 190 18 228 11 9 3 23 572 Volume Peak Factor 0.980 High Int. 02:30 PM 02:30 PM 02:15 PM 02:00 PM Volume 2 257 12 271 10 11 29 50 25 226 18 269 17 33 19 69 Peak Factor 0.878 0.840 0.913 0.507 FAQIFIG HWY Out In Total 889 E4.9ft 1641 � l 1 301 8871 35� t L+ w N � � —► ?Ji7J2014 i:45:00 PM �z gl 5 �112f2014 23020 PM J +1 � Left Thm FWU 821 alai 821 1 1 1 1018 7-9-8-21, 2000 Out In Total 61 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463r Site Code : 00003463 Start Date 12/4/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed Unshifted PACIFIC HWY I 304TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 304TH ST S Southbound_ Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right F-Thru Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Int. Total Factor _Left 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 . 1.0 04:00 PM 8 338 6 11 - 17 37 34 226 14 11 10 6 718 04:15 PM 8 296 14 9 11 37 24 234 19 9 6 11 678 04:30 PM 9 338 11 7 6 25 21 241 15 7 11 6 697 04:45 PM 10 301 14 18 15 36 32 248 23 11 12 14 _ 734 Total 35 1273 45 45 _ 49 135 ill 949 71 38 39 37' 2827 05:00 PM 3 331 10 15 10 21 27 205 19 6 5 21 654 05:15 PM 9 340 26 12 25 28 33 252 16 12 8 8 769 05:30 PM 11 364 15 18 10 24 29 244 25 12 2 2 756 05:45 PM 3 306 17 9 19 31 21 194 23 12 10 3 648 Total 26 1341 68 54 64 104 110 895 83 42 25 i5 2827 Grand Total 61 2614 113 99 113 239 221 1844 154 80 64 52I 5654 Apprch % 2.2 93.8 4.1 22.0 25.1 53.0 10.0 83.1 6.9 40.8 32.7 26.5 Total % 1.1 46.2 2.0 • 1.8 2.0 4.2 3.9 32.6 2.7 1.4 1.1 0.9 Y Out In Total 19954783 611 2614 t FlIgN Thru H' v � �O �JJ North a ti Nk A 1214/2013 5:45:PM 00 PM N - LfslsNPoad r aw <c - + T r Let Thru F9 ht 1541 18441 221 2933 2218 5152 Out In Total M Sr 62 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463r Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 12/4/2013 Page No : 2 PACIFIC HWY 304TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 304TH Sl S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru 1 Left App' Right Thru Left App. Right I Thru Left App' Right Thru Left App. lnt. Total Total) Total Total Total 9k Hour From 04:00 PM to 05.45 PM - Peak 1 Of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM I I Volume 33 1336 65 1434 63 60 109 232 121 949 83 1153 41 27 26 94 2913 Percent 2.3 93.2 4.5 27.2 25.9 47.0 10.5 82.3 7.2 43.6 28.7 27.7 05:15 9 340 26 375 12 25 28 65 33 252 16 301 12 8 8 28 769 Volume Peak Factor 0.947 High Int. 05:30 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 04:45 PM Volume 11 364 15 390 18 15 36 69 32 248 23 303 11 12 14 371 Peak Factor 0.919 0.841 0.951 0.635 PAQ1FIC HWY Out In Total 10381 1 104 1 2472 1 1 ' i�ssl 13381 sal Thru UM += ! ► North t?14120 34:45:OOPM 1214/2013 5:30:00 PM UnMfted Left Thru R'gri §31 949 1211 14 66 1 53 F26W Out In Total PACIFIC H%Y 63 Heath & Associates, Inc 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463s Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/12/2014 Page No :1 Groups Printed- Unshifted PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time I Right I Thru I Left Fright Thru Left Ri ht Thru Left Ri -clbt I Thru Left Int. Total Factor 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0. 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.01 1.0 1.0 07:00 AM 23 77 6 5 2 31 1 189 151 19 3 27 370 07:15 AM 42 94 5 9 5 5 2 227 241 10 8 361 467 07:30 AM 38 138 7 9 4 1 4 251 17 16 4 28 517 07:45 AM 13 143 6 5 0 4 k 0 204 11 15 2 21 424 Total 116 452' 24 28 t11 13 7 871 V 50 17 112 1778 Grand Total 116 452 24 28 11 13 7 871 67 60 17 112 1778 Apprch % 19.6 76.4 4.1 53.8 21.2 25.0 0.7 92.2 7.1 31.7 9.0 59.3 Total % 6.5 25.4 1.3 1.6 0.6 0.7 0.4 49.0 3.8 3.4 1.0 6.3 PA ! HWY Out in Total 1011 592. 1603 116 452k 241 Agra id 1.6R 4-'L* f m Ip�0 'J North W IT c k`-� 211212014 7:0:00 AM E-I� 2112 014 7:45:00 AM o r •- � � llnShitted _�� � 1w c w r+ Left Thru RIn 9711 7 525 1470 Out In Total 64 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463s Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/12/2014 Page No : 2 PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru Left App' Right I Thru Left App' Right I Thru Left App' I Right Thru Left App. Int Total _ Total Total Total Total _ leak Hour From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:00 AM l Volume 116 452 24 592 28 11 13 52 7 871 67 945 60 17 112 189 1778 Percent 19.6 76.4 4.1 53.8 21.2 25.0 0.7 92.2 7.1 31.7 9.0 59.3 07:30 38 138 7 183 9 4 1 14 4 251 17 272 16 4 28 48 517 Volume Peak Factor 0.860 High Int. 07:30 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:15 AM Volume 38 138 7 183 9 5 5 19 4 251 17 272 10 8 36 54 Peak Factor 0.809 0.684 0.869 0.875 C HWY Out In Total 1011 592 F 1603 116, 452: 241 Fight TFwt Left 4 ] �Y CO 41 � �J North ? w F F1'� �—* W12120147==AM 4 9 X12M14 7.45:00 AM i r j_ L�sstdfted IF7ao 0 ov o_ LeR iiw R 525� 1470 Out 1n Total PACIFIC HWY 65 PACIFIC HWY l Souhbound Start Time I Flight Thru Left Factor J 1.0 1.0 1.0 01:45 PM 11 208 15 Total 11� 208 is 02:00 PM 36 185 7 02:15 PM 23 218 21 02:30 PM 15 243 19 Grand Total 85 854 62 Apprch % 8.5 85.3 6.2 Total % 3.8 37.9 2.7 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463t Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/13/2014 Page No : 1 _Groups Printed- Unshifted 308TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S Westbound Northbound Eastbound i�ht Thru Left Right.. Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total 1.0 1.01 1.0. 1.0 1.01 1.0 1.01 1.0 i 1.0 11 3 5 12 214 32 7 3 18 539 11 3 5j 12 214 32' 7 3 18 539 12 7 8 4 222 22 22 9 31 565 13 4 5 5 206 24 16 6 32 573 8 4 6 5 204 31 17 2 24 578 44 18 24 26 846 109 62 20 105 2255 51.2 20.9 27.9 2.7 86.2 11.1 33.2 10.7 56.1 2.0 0.8 1.1 1.2 37.5 4.8 2.7 0.9 4.7 PACIFIC HM Out in Total 995 tool1996 85 854 62 Rietht Thru Left w L+ Fan] 0 North 0° t� 3120141 21t•.46' d PM j 4 � F - I~ 2/13=14 2:30:00 PM a' a' O N �-- fro-- urislrifiea fa r Time RI 1091 846 26� i i 940 987; 1921 Out in Total 66 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463t Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 2/13/2014 Page No : 2 PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App' Total Right Thru Left App' Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int., Total ea![ Hour From 01:45 PM to 02:30 PIN - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 01:45 PM f Volume 85 854 62 1001 44 18 24 86 26 846 109 981 62 20 105 187 2255 Percent 8.5 85.3 6.2 51.2 20.9 27.9 2.7 86.2 11.1 33.2 10.7 56.1 02:30 15 243 19 277 8 4 6 18 5 204 31 240 17 2 24 43 578 Volume Peak Factor 0.975 High Int. 02:30 PM 02:00 PM 01:45 PM 02:00 PM Volume 15 243 19 277 12 7 8 27 12 214 32 258 22 9 31 62 Peak Factor 0.903 0.796 0.951 0.754 1 Y Out in Total 995 1�01 1996 — j r-85 854 821 Right Thu Left m F- m o � �- North m c .- w —► 013=141:45:00PMIE 2J1312014 2:30:00 PM on F' Left Thru RO � 1d9 s4s zGi 940 8811 1921 Out In Total PACIRC HWY 67 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 Groups Printed PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S Southbound Westbound Start Time Right Thru' Right Thru Left Factor 1.0 1.0 _Left 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 21 304 23 13 5 7 04:15 PM 14 368 21 13 4 9 04:30 PM 17 351 25 12 2 5 04:45 PM 40 3173. 27 11 5 3 Total 92 1326 96 49 16 24 05:00 PM 31 328 18 13 4 5 05:15 PM 28 330 15 13 4 3 05:30 PM 31 377 19 12 3 4 05:45 PM 26 331 18 18 7 11 Total 116 1366 70 56 18 23 Grand Total 208 2692 166 105 34 47 Apprch % 6.8 87.8 5.4 56.5 18.3 25.3 Total % 3.6 46.9 2.9 1.8 0.6 0.8 1.01 1.0 3 250 10 259 5 219 4 224 22 952 4 272 5 233 3 228 4 211 16 944 38 1896 1.8 88.0 0.7 33.0 File Name : 3463u Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 12/3/2013 Page No : 1 308TH ST S Eastbound Left Right l Thru I Left Int. Total 1.01 1.0 [ 1.01 1.0 27 10 12 31 706 31 11 4 23 767 29 12 2 30 709 36 7 3 22 685 123 40 21 106 2867 39 13 1 29 757 25 11 6 23 696 14 13 6 30 740 19 10 4 18 677 97 47 17 100 2870 220 87 38 206 5737 10.2 26.3 11.5 62.2 3.8 1.5 0.7 3.6 PACIFIC HVVY Out In Total 2207 i WS-6 1 5273 f 1 208 26921 16B 99M Thru Left l 4. o._ North per_ N CO " 1 P1312013 4=:00 PM 1 - - 12/3/2013 5:45:00 PM . O �nl•- - 00 Unshifted r � 0�o � T Left Thru R It 220 18961 08 i 1 T 2826 4980 Out In Total 68 Heath & Associates, Inc. 2214 Tacoma Road Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3463u Site Code : 00003463 Start Date : 12/3/2013 Page No : 2 PACIFIC HWY 308TH ST S PACIFIC HWY 308I H 51 z Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right I Thru Left I Right 1 Thru LeftI APP. Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Total Total Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:15 PM Volume 102 1350 91 1543 49 15 22 861 23 974 135 1132 43 10 104 Percent 6.6 87.5 5.9 57.0 17.4 25.6 2.0 86.0 11.9 27.4 6.4 66.2 04-15 14 368 21 403 13 4 9 26 10 259 31 300 11 4 23 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM Volume 14 368 21 403 13 4 9 26 4 272 39 315 12 2 30 Peak Factor 0.957 0.827 0.898 PAGI Out In C HWY Total 1127_ 1543 1 2670 ram- 1021 13501 9 Rk" Thu Left L* FMI North p l Pl3= 3 5:00:00 PM u+ w i!UrMhNW r'yy� N 1Cr x�A1i �O ow F+ Lett Thru Rii1 135' 974 23+9i4 23+. E4 1415 113� F2W Out In Total APP. Int. Total Total 157 2918 38 767 0.951 44 0.892 69 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 1: 16th Ave S & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Intersec#'ion Int Delay, s/veh 9.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol,veh/h 16 57 38 148 47 43 16 42 116 31 45 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - - None None None Storage Length - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 5 4 0 0 5 5 5 0 4 0 Mvmt Flow 21 74 49 192 61 56 21 55 151 40 58 6 Ma ooklin.r Ma or1 Ma"or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 117 0 0 123 0 0 646 641 99 716 638 89 Stage 1 - - - - - - 140 140 - 473 473 - Stage 2 - - 506 501 - 243 165 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.14 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.1 6.54 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.1 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.1 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.236 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.5 4.036 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1484 1452 380 389 949 348 392 975 Stage - 856 775 - 576 555 - Stage 2 - - 543 538 - 765 758 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1484 1452 289 329 949 226 331 975 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 289 329 - 226 331 - Stage 1 843 763 - 567 476 - Stage 2 - 406 462 - 589 747 - Ap roach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 4.9 15.4 24.2 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR SBI_n1 Capacity (veh/h) 570 1484 - 1452 291 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.396 0.014 - - 0.132 - 0.361 HCM Control Delay (s) 15.4 7.5 0 - 7.9 0 24.2 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 0 - - 0.5 - 1.6 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 70 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 15: 14th Ave S & S 3O8th St 2/19/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 9.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR [NBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 86 97 24 45 54 56 21 21 49 16 19 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 50 0 0 50 0 100 0 0 50 100 0 50 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None None Storage Length - - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 0 - 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 130 147 36 68 82 85 32 32 74 24 29 41 Major/Minor Majorl Ma'or2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 267 0 0 233 0 0 851 879 315 890 855 274 Stage 1 - - - - - 476 476 - 361 361 - Stage 2 - - - 375 403 - 529 494 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1308 - 1346 282 288 730 266 298 770 Stage 1 - - - 574 560 - 662 629 - Stage 2 - - - - 650 603 - 537 550 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1254 - 1234 191 210 641 152 217 676 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 191 210 - 152 217 - Stage 1 - 486 474 - 536 541 - Stage 2 - 520 519 - 359 466 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.4 2.3 24.7 23.1 HCM LOS C C Minor LanetMaior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn? Capacity (vehlh) 318 1254 1234 182 676 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.434 0.104 - 0.055 - 0.291 0.061 HCM Control Delay (s) 24.7 8.2 0 8.1 0 32.7 10.7 HCM Lane LOS C A A A A D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.1 0.3 - 0.2 - 1.2 0.2 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 71 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 13: S 308th St & SE Exit 2/17/2014 lntcrs,'Gtlon Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EST UVBT N1BR SSL . SBR Vol, veh/h 0 110 120 0 37 42 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 155 169 0 52 59 M,-jGr Mv-ir.r Ma or1 i:1e'ort Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 169 0 0 324 169 Stage 1 - - - 169 - Stage 2 - - 155 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1421 - 674 880 Stage 1 - - 866 - Stage 2 - - 878 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1421 674 880 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 674 - Stage 1 866 Stage 2 - 878 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 10.5 HCM LOS B Minor LanelMajor Mvrnt EBL EST WBT WBR S8Ln1 Capacity (veh/h) 1421 - 770 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.145 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 10.5 HCM Lane LOS A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.5 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 72 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 2: Pacific Hwy S & S 304th St * I 2/17/2014 Late Group Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) 2/11/2014 Baseline ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NSA N8R SBL 5BT SBR 82 67 53 65 98 39 70 939 36 39 430 84 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0 0 0 0 250 0 250 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 25 25 25 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.850 0.974 0.850 0.850 0.973 0.984 0.950 0.950 0 1849 1615 0 1821 0 1805 3574 1615 1805 3574 1615 0.698 0.840 0.441 0.179 0 1326 1615 0 1555 0 838 3574 1615 340 3574 1615 Yes Yes Yes Yes 91 20 91 99 30 30 30 30 280 1002 1344 1000 6.4 22.8 30.5 22.7 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 96 79 62 76 115 46 82 1105 42 46 506 99 0 175 62 0 237 0 82 1105 42 46 506 99 No No No No No No No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Perm NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm 4 8 5 2 1 6 4 4 8 2 2 6 6 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 32.0 32.0 8.0 32.0 32.0 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 13.3% 53.3% 53.3% 13.3% 53.3% 53.3% 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 28.0 28.0 4.0 28.0 28.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 73 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 2: Pacific Hwy S & S 304th St 2/17/2014 ­-* 4- *-- t II t 41 --p. Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NSR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 25.9 24.6 24.6 25.1 23.0 23.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.54 0.52 0.52 0.53 0.48 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.13 0.58 0.15 0.60 0.05 0.15 0.29 0.12 Control Delay 23.3 3.3 22.1 5.8 11.0 0.7 6.2 9.3 2.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.3 3.3 22.1 5.8 11.0 0.7 6.2 9.3 2.9 LOS C A C A B A A A A Approach Delay 18.1 22.1 10.3 8.1 Approach LOS B C B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 39 0 48 9 87 0 5 49 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 99 13 119 23 194 3 15 78 18 Internal Link Dist (ft) 200 922 1264 920 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 250 Base Capacity(vph) 469 630 563 541 2214 1035 308 2214 1038 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.10 0.42 0.15 0.50 0.04 0.15 0.23 0.10 Interst;ctiorT Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 47.6 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.60 Intersection Signal Delay:11.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.1 % ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Cnhtc and Phneae• 9• Pnrifir Hir.+tir R R, R 3ndth Rt 01 �04 8I Li 32 s _ 2f s: 05 1 ` m6 08 85 3ZS 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 2 74 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 7: Pacific Hwy S & S 308th St 2117/2014 � ■-- * I I t Lane Group EBL EST EBR VVBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *4 *4 ' tt r ++ r Volume (vph) 112 17 60 13 11 28 67 871 7 24 452 116 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 250 0 300 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.957 0.927 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.971 0.988 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1748 0 0 1706 0 1770 3539 1583 1787 3574 1599 Fit Permitted 0.783 0.917 0.428 0.217 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1410 0 0 1583 0 797 3539 1583 408 3574 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 38 33 91 135 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 150 1000 1321 1344 Travel Time (s) 3.4 22.7 30.0 30.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Adj. Flow (vph) 130 20 70 15 13 33 78 1013 8 28 526 135 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 220 0 0 61 0 78 1013 8 28 526 135 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 32.0 32.0 8.0 32.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 13.3% 53.3% 53.3% 13.3% 53.3% 53.3% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 28.0 28.0 4.0 28.0 28.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 75 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 7: Pacific Hwx S & S 308th St 2/17/2014 --I, *-- 4-- t II i 4/ Lane Group EBL t§T -EBR WSL WBT 1ABR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 11.3 11.3 25.6 24.3 24.3 24.6 22.4 22.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.55 0.52 0.52 0.53 0.48 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.15 0.15 0.55 0.01 0.08 0.31 0.16 Control Delay 21.1 10.7 5.7 10.3 0.0 5.5 9.3 2.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.1 10.7 5.7 10.3 0.0 5.5 9.3 2.7 LOS C B A B A A A A Approach Delay 21.1 10.7 9.9 7.8 Approach LOS C B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 33 5 7 66 0 3 46 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 108 30 23 177 0 11 83 21 Internal Link Dist (ft) 70 920 1241 1264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 300 Base Capacity (vph) 535 595 525 2246 1038 340 2268 1064 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.10 0.15 0.45 0.01 0.08 0.23 0.13 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 46.6 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Cnli!c and Phases• 7• Pnrifr. H aw S R S *wth St 01 1 02tl4 $s - ZOS J 05 II TA` �6 F- y 08 8s 32s 20G 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 2 jr.4 HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 AM Peak Hour Volumes With Project 4: NW Access & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 5.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, vehlh 92 25 129 62 11 105 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 119 32 168 81 14 136 Ma'orfMinor Ma or1 Ma'of2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 152 0 552 136 Stage 1 - - - 136 - Stage 2 - 416 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1441 498 918 Stage 1 - 895 - Stage 2 - 670 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1441 437 918 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 437 - Stage 1 895 Stage 2 - 588 Approach EB WB N8 HCM Control Delay, s 0 5.3 10.3 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Maor Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (vehlh) 831 - 1441 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.181 - 0.116 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 0.4 - 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 77 HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 AM Peak Hour Volumes With Project 1: 16th Ave S & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 4.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 44 140 13 49 151 43 5 14 39 31 15 35 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None None None Storage Length - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 5 4 0 0 5 5 5 0 4 0 Mvmt Flow 57 182 17 64 196 56 6 18 51 40 19 45 Ma'orlMinor Ma orl Ma or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 252 0 0 199 0 0 689 684 190 690 664 224 Stage - - - - - - 305 305 - 351 351 - Stage 2 - - 384 379 - 339 313 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.14 7.15 6.55 6.25 7.1 6.54 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.15 5.55 - 6.1 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.15 5.55 - 6.1 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.236 3.545 4.045 3.345 3.5 4.036 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1325 1361 356 367 844 362 379 820 Stage 1 - - 698 657 - 670 629 - Stage 2 - - - 633 609 - 680 653 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1325 1361 297 330 844 301 341 820 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 297 330 - 301 341 - Stage 1 - - 664 625 - 638 594 - Stage 2 - 546 576 - 591 622 - Approach EB WB NB $6 HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 1.6 12.6 16.2 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Maor Nlvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SSLn1 Capacity (vehlh) 550 1325 - 1361 427 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.137 0.043 - - 0.047 - 0.246 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.6 7.8 0 - 7.8 0 16.2 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.1 - - 0.1 - 1 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 78 HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 AM Peak Hour Volumes With Project 15: 14th Ave S & S 3O8th St 2/19/2014 InEars��cii^.n - Int Delay, s/veh 21.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT JER Vol, veh/h 115 78 24 31 32 107 21 36 34 53 33 55 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 50 0 0 50 0 100 0 0 50 100 0 50 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None None Storage Length - - - - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 174 118 36 47 48 162 32 55 52 80 50 83 Major/Minor Ma orl Ma"or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 311 0 0 205 0 0 883 940 286 911 876 280 Stage 1 - - - - 535 535 - 323 323 - Stage 2 - 348 405 - 588 553 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1261 1378 269 266 758 257 290 764 Stage - - 533 527 - 693 654 - Stage 2 - - 672 602 - 499 518 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1208 - 1263 150 188 666 133 205 671 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 150 188 - 133 205 - Stage 1 430 425 - 535 574 - Stage 2 493 528 - 310 418 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 4.5 1.5 39.1 61.8 HCM LOS E F Minor LanelMa'or ki mt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 238 1208 1263 154 671 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.579 0.144 - 0.037 - 0.846 0.124 HCM Control Delay (s) 39.1 8.5 0 8 0 94.3 11.1 HCM Lane LOS E A A A A F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.3 0.5 - 0.1 - 5.7 0.4 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 79 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes 1: 16th Ave S & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.4 Movement EBL EST EER WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT 5BR Vol, veh/h 15 63 19 56 46 29 17 18 53 27 12 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None - None Storage Length - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - 0 0 Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 24 102 31 90 74 47 27 29 85 44 19 23 Major/Minor Ma-orl Ma or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 121 0 0 132 0 0 464 467 117 501 459 98 Stage 1 - - - - - 165 165 - 278 278 - Stage 2 - - 299 302 - 223 181 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.11' 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.209 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1479 1459 510 495 938 484 502 963 Stage - - 839 764 - 733 684 - Stage 2 - - 712 666 - 784 754 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1479 1459 451 454 938 392 460 963 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 451 454 - 392 460 - Stage 1 824 750 - 720 638 - Stage 2 629 621 - 673 740 - Approach EB WB N8 HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 3.3 12 14 HCM LOS B B MinosrLaneftior Nlurnt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR 'd K �,+ET WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 657 1479 1459 - - 484 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.216 0.016 0.062 - - 0.177 HCM Control Delay (s) 12 7.5 0 7.6 0 - 14 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 0 - 0.2 - - 0.6 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 80 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes 15: 14th Ave S & S 308th St 2/19/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 10.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR VJBI_ WBT WBR N8L NBT NSR SBL SBT S13R Vol, vehlh 16 95 31 47 78 10 58 13 60 26 19 48 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 50 0 0 50 0 100 0 0 50 100 0 50 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None None Storage Length - - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 24 144 47 71 118 15 88 20 91 39 29 73 Ma or/Minor Ma'ar1 Ma or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 233 0 0 241 0 0 649 642 317 689 657 276 Stage 1 - - - - - 266 266 - 368 368 - Stage 2 - - - - 383 376 - 321 289 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1346 1337 - 386 395 728 363 387 768 Stage 1 - - - - 744 692 - 656 625 - Stage 2 - - - 644 620 - 695 677 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1290 1226 276 318 640 234 312 675 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 276 318 - 234 312 - Stage 1 698 649 - 589 537 - Stage 2 488 533 - 519 635 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.9 2.8 24.4 17 HCM LOS C C Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 380 1290 - - 1226 262 675 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.522 0.019 - - 0.058 - 0.26 0.108 HCM Control Delay (s) 24.4 7.8 0 - 8.1 0 23.5 11 HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.9 0.1 - - 0.2 - 1 0.4 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 81 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes 13: S 308th St & SE Exit 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EEL EBT WBT [NBR SBL SSR Vol, veh/h 0 169 116 0 16 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % - 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 190 130 0 18 21 Major/Minor Ma'or1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 130 0 0 320 130 Stage 1 - - - 130 - Stage 2 - - - 190 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1468 - 678 925 Stage 1 - - 901 - Stage 2 - - 847 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1468 678 925 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 678 - Stage 1 901 Stage 2 847 Approach ES WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor LaneWM or Mvmt EBL EBT WB T W8R SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1468 793 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.05 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 9.8 HCM Lane LOS A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 82 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes 2: Pacific Hwy S & S 304th St I 2/17/2014 --I. t / t 4/ Lane Group Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) 2/11/2014 Baseline EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR +T r ft tt r 38 56 46 85 50 33 82 818 82 35 887 30 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0 0 0 0 250 0 250 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 25 25 25 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.850 0.973 0.850 0.850 0.980 0.975 0.950 0.950 0 1862 1615 0 1802 0 1805 3574 1615 1805 3574 1615 0.853 0.791 0.248 0.312 0 1621 1615 0 1462 0 471 3574 1615 593 3574 1615 Yes Yes Yes Yes 91 20 91 91 30 30 30 30 280 1002 1344 1000 6.4 22.8 30.5 22.7 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 0% 39 57 47 87 51 34 84 835 84 36 905 31 0 96 47 0 172 0 84 835 84 36 905 31 No No No No No No No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Perm NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm 4 8 5 2 1 6 4 4 8 2 2 6 6 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 9.0 32.0 32.0 8.0 31.0 31.0 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 15.0% 53.3% 53.3% 13.3% 51.7% 51.7% 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 5.0 28.0 28.0 4.0 27.0 27.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 83 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes 2: Pacific Hwy S & S 304th St 2/17/2014 _J* __I, *-- 4,\ t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR N8L NBT NBR SSL SST SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 10.3 10.3 10.4 27.2 27.0 27.0 25.7 25.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.62 0.61 0.61 0.58 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.11 0.48 0.18 0.38 0.08 0.08 0.45 0.03 Control Delay 18.1 2.0 20.0 5.5 8.1 2.6 5.0 10.1 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.1 2.0 20.0 5.5 8.1 2.6 5.0 10.1 0.1 LOS B A B A A A A B A Approach Delay 12.8 20.0 7.5 9.6 Approach LOS B B A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 22 0 36 7 48 0 3 94 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 60 8 94 25 147 17 13 169 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 200 922 1264 920 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio F_ ri 5un"Mary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 44.1 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.48 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1 % Analysis Period (min) 15 641 693 590 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.15 0.07 0.29 Cnhtc nnrl Phncee• 9• Pacific H1AA, C R. R 3ndth St Intersection LOS: A ICU Level of Service B 250 250 455 2457 1139 465 2385 1108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.18 0.34 0.07 0.08 0.38 0.03 01 f L? 4 8s1 7.0S 05 4 11'p6 08 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 2 84 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes 7: Pacific Hwy S & S 308th St 2/17/2014 ■-- t I # --IN. Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r tt r Volume (vph) 105 20 62 24 18 44 109 846 26 62 854 85 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 250 0 300 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.955 0.930 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.973 0.986 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1748 0 0 1708 0 1770 3539 1583 1787 3574 1599 At Permitted 0.834 0.906 0.241 0.309 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1498 0 0 1570 0 449 3539 1583 581 3574 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 42 45 91 91 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 150 1000 1321 1344 Travel Time (s) 3.4 22.7 30.0 30.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Adj. Flow (vph) 107 20 63 24 18 45 111 863 27 63 871 87 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 190 0 0 87 0 111 863 27 63 871 87 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 10.0 31.0 31.0 8.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 16.7% 51.7% 51.7% 13.3% 48.3% 48.3% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 6.0 27.0 27.0 4.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 85 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes 7: Pacific Hwy S & S 308th St 2/17/2014 --► t II t r Lang Group ESL EBT LBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 10.6 29.6 27.9 27.9 26.3 24.7 24.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.63 0.60 0.60 0.56 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.22 0.24 0.41 0.03 0.14 0.46 0.10 Control Delay 19.0 11.2 6.0 9.4 0.0 5.8 11.8 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.0 11.2 6.0 9.4 0.0 5.8 11.8 3.2 LOS B B A A A A B A Approach Delay 19.0 11.2 8.8 10.7 Approach LOS B B A B Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 9 10 85 0 6 94 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 92 40 33 160 0 21 173 20 Internal Link Dist (ft) 70 920 1241 1264 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 300 Base Capacity (vph) 616 646 469 2216 1025 438 2074 966 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.13 0.24 0.39 0.03 0.14 0.42 0.09 Intersection Surnma Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 46.7 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Signal Delay: 10.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 Cnhtc onri Phoeee• 7• Porifirr, Hime R .% C 3nAth St 01 '02 d4 s 31 s. 211 � 05 ��i m8 s 29•s � s - 2111/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 2 86 HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes With Project 4: NW Access & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 91 13 45 71 11 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 62 62 62 62 62 62 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 147 21 73 115 18 76 Ma orUnor Ma'orl Ma"or2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 168 0 417 157 Stage 1 - - - 157 - Stage 2 - - - 260 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 1422 596 894 Stage 1 - - 876 - Stage 2 - - 788 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1422 563 894 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 563 - Stage 1 876 Stage 2 745 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3 10A HCM LOS B Minor LanelMa'or Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR W8L WBT Capacity (veh/h) 804 1422 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.116 0.051 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.2 - 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 87 HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes With Project 1: 16th Ave S & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT FBR WBL W8T WBR NBL NIST NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 27 105 6 19 88 29 6 6 18 27 4 22 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 62 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 MvmtFlow 44 169 10 31 142 47 10 10 29 44 6 35 Ma'orrMinor Ma'orl Major 2 Minorl Minot Conflicting Flow All 189 0 0 179 0 0 509 511 174 508 493 165 Stage 1 - - - - - 261 261 - 227 227 - Stage 2 - - - 248 250 - 281 266 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.11 - 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.11 5.51 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.209 - 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1397 - 1403 - 476 467 872 479 480 885 Stage 1 - - - - 746 694 - 780 720 - Stage 2 - - - 758 702 - 730 692 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1397 - 1403 432 439 872 435 452 885 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 432 439 - 435 452 - Stage 1 - 720 670 - 753 702 - Stage 2 703 684 - 671 668 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 1.1 11.3 12.7 HCM LOS B B Minor LanelMa'or Mvrnt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnI Capacity (veh/h) 622 1397 1403 - 553 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.078 0.031 - - 0.022 - 0.155 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.3 7.7 0 7.6 0 12.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.5 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 88 HCM 2010 TWSC 2019 Afternoon Peak Hour Volumes With Project 15: 14th Ave S & S 308th St 2/19/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 12.5 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI_ SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 27 84 31 41 73 27 58 19 54 42 25 61 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 50 0 0 50 0 100 0 0 50 100 0 50 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None None - - None None Storage Length - - - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 41 127 47 62 111 41 88 29 82 64 38 92 Majoriminor Majorl Major2 tviinorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 252 0 0 224 0 0 657 659 301 693 661 281 Stage - - - - - - 283 283 - 355 355 - Stage 2 - - - 374 376 - 338 306 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1325 1357 - 381 386 743 360 385 763 Stage 1 - - - - 728 681 - 666 633 - Stage 2 - - - 651 620 - 681 665 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1270 1244 - 255 309 653 229 308 670 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 255 309 - 229 308 - Stage 1 - - 673 629 - 589 548 - Stage 2 - 473 537 - 502 614 - Approach EB WB NB SS HCM Control Delay, s 1.5 2.3 27.7 20.2 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Maior [Avm.,t NBLnl EEL EST EBR WBL WET WBR SBLnl SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 352 1270 1244 - 253 670 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.564 0.032 - 0.05 - - 0.401 0.138 HCM Control Delay (s) 27.7 7.9 0 - 8 0 - 28.4 11.2 HCM Lane LOS D A A - A A - D B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.3 0.1 - 0.2 - - 1.8 0.5 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 89 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes 1: 16th Ave S & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.2 Movement EBL EBT E$R WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR 5BL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 5 32 10 52 67 21 18 10 53 38 18 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 7 45 14 73 94 30 25 14 75 54 25 10 Major/Minor Ma'or1 Ma'or2 Minorl Minar2 Conflicting Flow All 124 0 0 59 0 0 339 336 52 367 329 109 Stage 1 - - - - - 66 66 - 256 256 - Stage 2 - 273 270 - 111 73 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.1 7.14 6.54 6.24 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.14 5.54 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.14 5.54 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 2.2 3.536 4.036 3.336 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1469 1558 611 581 1010 591 592 947 Stage - - 940 836 - 751 697 - Stage 2 - - 729 682 - 897 836 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1469 1558 559 549 1010 514 560 947 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 559 549 - 514 560 - Stage 1 935 832 747 662 - Stage 2 659 648 813 832 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.8 2.8 10.3 12.7 HCM LOS B B Minor LaneWa'or Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WSL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 787 1469 1558 555 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.145 0.005 - 0.047 - 0.16 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 7.5 0 7.4 0 12.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0.1 - 0.6 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 90 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes 15: 14th Ave S & S 308th St 2/19/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.6 Movement EBL EBT FBR WBL W$T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 8 79 23 41 114 8 64 5 52 5 10 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 20 0 0 20 0 40 0 0 20 40 0 20 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 101 29 53 146 10 82 6 67 6 13 13 Major/Minor Ma or1 Ma or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 196 0 0 151 0 0 460 459 176 489 467 211 Stage 1 - - - - - - 157 157 - 296 296 Stage 2 - - - - 303 302 - 193 171 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1389 1442 515 502 872 493 496 834 Stage 1 - - 850 772 - 717 672 - Stage 2 - - 711 668 - 813 761 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1366 1394 461 453 829 403 448 793 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 461 453 - 403 448 - Stage 1 - 829 753 - 688 622 - Stage 2 645 619 - 711 742 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 1.9 13.7 12.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 569 1366 - 1394 432 793 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.273 0.008 - - 0.038 - 0.045 0.016 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.7 7.7 0 - 7.7 0 13.7 9.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 0 - - 0.1 - 0.1 0 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 91 HCM 2010 TWSC Existing 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes 13: S 308th St & SE Exit 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Vol, veh/h 0 147 159 0 9 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 167 181 0 10 8 Major/Minor Ma or1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 181 0 0 348 181 Stage 1 - - - 181 - Stage 2 - - 167 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1407 653 867 Stage 1 - 855 - Stage 2 - 867 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1407 653 867 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 653 - Stage 1 855 - Stage 2 867 - Approach ES WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 10 HCM LOS B Minor LanelMa'or Mvmt EBL EST WBT WBR SBLnt Capacity (vehlh) 1407 - 732 HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 10 HCM Lane LOS A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.1 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 92 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes 2: Pacific Hwy S & S 304th St II 2/18/2014 } --I, --v t i 4/ Lane Group Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All -Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) 2/11/2014 Baseline EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 4 r ft r tt r 26 27 41 109 60 63 83 949 121 65 1336 33 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0 0 0 0 250 0 250 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 25 25 25 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.850 0.963 0.850 0.850 0.976 0.977 0.950 0.950 0 1836 1599 0 1788 0 1787 3574 1599 1787 3574 1599 0.833 0.822 0.131 0.220 0 1567 1599 0 1504 0 246 3574 1599 414 3574 1599 Yes Yes Yes Yes 91 30 127 91 30 30 30 30 280 1002 1344 1000 6.4 22.8 30.5 22.7 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 27 28 43 115 63 66 87 999 127 68 1406 35 0 55 43 0 244 0 87 999 127 68 1406 35 No No No No No No No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Perm NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm 4 8 5 2 1 6 4 4 8 2 2 6 6 4 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 31.0 31.0 9.0 32.0 32.0 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 13.3% 51.7% 51.7% 15.0% 53.3% 53.3% 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 27.0 27.0 5.0 28.0 28.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 93 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes 2: Pacific Hwy S & S 304th St 2/18/2014 --I. 1- ~ t I Lane Group EBL EBT FOR WBL WBT WBR NSL NBT NBR SBL 5BT SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 12.5 12.5 12.5 32.8 30.5 30.5 33.3 29.4 29.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.58 0.54 0.54 0.59 0.52 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.10 0.68 0.34 0.52 0.14 0.18 0.75 0.04 Control Delay 18.4 1.6 27.7 9.0 11.2 2.8 6.0 15.8 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.4 1.6 27.7 9.0 11.2 2.8 6.0 15.8 0.2 LOS B A C A B A A B A Approach Delay 11.0 27.7 10.1 15.0 Approach LOS B C B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 0 66 10 123 0 8 197 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 6 131 26 193 24 21 #316 1 Internal Link Dist (ft) 200 922 1264 920 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 250 Base Capacity (vph) 448 523 452 253 1938 925 368 1869 879 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.08 0.54 0.34 0.52 0.14 0.18 0.75 0.04 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 56.2 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Rnfitc anfi Phacac• 2- Pnrifir. Hwv S R S m4th St 01 i 2t'02 7- ft4 $ 1g 2D 65 .6 e 8 S s. 32 s 2ft 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 2 94 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes 7: Pacific Hwy S & S 308th St 2/17/2014 ---* --I.i- I *\0.t I 4/ Lane Group_E$L EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations c 1 ft r tt r Volume (vph) 104 10 43 22 15 49 135 974 23 91 1350 102 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 250 0 300 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.963 0.923 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.968 0.988 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1754 0 0 1733 0 1787 3574 1599 1787 3574 1599 Fit Permitted 0.826 0.918 0.138 0.211 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1496 0 0 1610 0 260 3574 1599 397 3574 1599 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 31 52 91 107 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 150 1000 1321 1344 Travel Time (s) 3.4 22.7 30.0 30.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) 109 11 45 23 16 52 142 1025 24 96 1421 107 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 165 0 0 91 0 142 1025 24 96 1421 107 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 8.0 31.0 31.0 9.0 32.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 13.3% 51.7% 51.7% 15.0% 53.3% 53.3% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 4.0 27.0 27.0 5.0 28.0 28.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 95 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes 7: Pacific Hwy S & S 308th St 2/17/2014 --I, -'V *-- *.- t II i41 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SET SBR Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 10.4 10.4 31.9 30.2 30.2 33.4 30.9 30.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.62 0.59 0.59 0.65 0.60 0.60 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.49 0.02 0.24 0.66 0.11 Control Delay 21.8 11.5 13.7 10.7 0.0 5.8 13.2 2.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.8 11.5 13.7 10.7 0.0 5.8 13.2 2.6 LOS C B B B A A B A Approach Delay 21.8 11.5 10.9 12.0 Approach LOS C B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 39 11 13 112 0 9 176 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 86 41 #66 198 0 28 #327 21 Internal Link Dist (ft) 70 920 1241 1264 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 508 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 I[[l�rSE'[:1iG1I �•L[Tllllc��1` Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 51.4 Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 250 300 559 285 2099 977 399 2151 1005 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.16 0.50 0.49 0.02 0.24 0.66 0.11 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. CnMe and Phnme• 7• Pacific Hv,w R R R 3nRth .4t 9s ��is _ 2Qs as. 1 1 32 s 2(is 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 2 96 HCM 2010 TWSC Future 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project 4: NW Access & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Interse0on Int Delay, s/veh 3.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Vol, veh/h 43 7 47 87 12 42 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 0 0 1 0 0 Mvmt Flow 61 10 66 123 17 59 Major/Minor Ma ort Ma or2 t.lir�.-nr1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 70 0 320 65 Stage 1 - - - - 65 - Stage 2 - - 255 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 6.4 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.4 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.2 3.5 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - 1544 678 1005 Stage 1 - - 963 - Stage 2 - - 792 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1544 647 1005 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 647 - Stage 1 963 Stage 2 756 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 2.6 9.4 HCM LOS A Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 895 - 1544 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085 - 0.043 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 - 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS A - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - 0.1 - 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 97 HCM 2010 TWSC Future 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project 1: 16th Ave S & S 304th St 2/17/2014 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 3.8 Movement EBL E8T EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NSR SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 12 70 3 17 109 21 6 3 18 38 6 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 71 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 0 0 0 4 4 4 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 17 99 4 24 154 30 8 4 25 54 8 27 Major/Minor Major1 Ma or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 183 0 0 103 0 0 369 366 101 365 353 168 Stage 1 - - - - - - 135 135 - 216 216 - Stage 2 - - - - 234 231 - 149 137 - Critical Hdwy 4.11 4.1 7.14 6.54 6.24 7.11 6.51 6.21 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.14 5.54 - 6.11 5.51 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.14 5.54 - 6.11 5.51 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.209 2.2 - 3.536 4.036 3.336 3.509 4.009 3.309 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1398 1502 - 584 559 949 593 574 879 Stage 1 - - 864 781 - 789 726 - Stage 2 - - 765 710 - 856 785 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1398 1502 547 542 949 560 556 879 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 547 542 - 560 556 - Stage 1 853 771 - 779 713 - Stage 2 720 697 - 818 775 - Approach EB W6 NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0.9 10 11.7 HCM LOS B B EEL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR SiBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 761 1398 1502 - 628 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.05 0.012 - - 0.016 - 0.141 HCM Control Delay (s) 10 7.6 0 - 7.4 0 - 11.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - 0.5 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 98 HCM 2010 TWSC Future 4-6 PM Peak Hour Volumes With Project 15: 14th Ave S & S 308th St 2/19/2014 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 5.8 :�:lf•:I:l>•�:3:+ 10 85 23 20 0 0 Free Free Free None 0 0 78 78 78 0 1 0 13 109 29 38 122 12 20 0 40 Free Free Free None 0 0 78 78 78 0 0 0 49 156 15 ►� lr lfil 64 6 51 0 0 20 Stop Stop Stop None 0 - 0 - 78 78 78 0 0 0 82 8 65 SBL SBT SBR 14 13 14 40 0 20 Stop Stop Stop None 0 0 0 78 78 78 0 0 0 18 17 18 MajorlMinor Major1 Major2 Minorl Nlinor2 Conflicting Flow All 212 0 0 158 0 0 479 478 184 508 486 224 Stage 1 - - - - - - 169 169 - 302 302 - Stage 2 - - - 310 309 - 206 184 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1370 1434 500 489 864 479 484 820 Stage - 838 763 - 712 668 - Stage 2 - - 705 663 - 801 751 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1347 1386 442 442 821 391 438 779 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 442 442 - 391 438 - Stage 1 816 743 - 681 621 - Stage 2 - 633 616 - 698 731 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 1.7 14.1 12.9 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Malor Mvmt NBLnl EBL EBT EBR VVBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 549 1347 - 1386 - 412 779 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.283 0.01 - 0.035 - - 0.084 0.023 HCM Control Delay (s) 14.1 7.7 0 7.7 0 - 14.5 9.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0 - 0.1 - - 0.3 0.1 2/11/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Report Page 1 W J E Photo W1 B A ti3 o o 0 o Area dedicated for ROW g -' - - per Roadway Cross- F p etlion R: 5,996 SF -South 304th Street _'lime . _._....ram. .... .. _ �. - - - . - -ry_y_�- rn Proposed new practice —es; and li Id sports noes; see F-cedes drawings for more formalion 10 Y A. 1 VICINITY MAP o r � Photo E5 � I � •-._.._ f fr .�'"".. ..•w i + 1 ra w.v + .i # `^'+ 1 I T M aoawg, see F- Q _•• 1 -- • 1 - •Y. ... � i r may hk ptian L_, ... _. ... + ; i ..-. ..... � - [ r _ p/�.I 7. 1 ped1411tR pgQM'ey}pdia •' PROJECT INFORMATION � LyeRrr1: 41,5525E r +r IBC GowpanryClo •E, A-1,A-2,A-3,M • 'aK�k C 'i741 fa�rR Ysrd�Soulh SL 1 D•-t $4s oM Rib Y �J FlcorAreas: Level 1: Cross Square Feet NY °4rgerd loeA6dEanwd Leve115(Seulh EntryJ-F +! Level 2: GSF E �L Leve13: GSF Total: GSF • 7 Total Pa Slags Required: i (v JGSF 1110 M denh X 1,6W Stl6D slags1/ emplDyee X 12D emplo2D stagsTotal Regsuired 2BOspAs TOWI Pro idea 610 ragsGarbagel Recyd'rig Space Reqs:2341X10 SF X 2 SF/ 1,006 SF Required •I ' Spam Provided = 466 SF SITEAR S I . � •� yy'/ 1' Taml Site Area 1,675,2D5 SF I (3646 arses) Rightaf-Way Dedicati ns 1 }• k; � %•• Pedestrian Areas f 4g.wir sF Y - r rho" Sig n Detun6on Facilities 77, SF and s ee ' jrge@lnl farts 6SF ® Easements - 1 �J ! Z V NeMft Aare 1,439,965 SF (3294 aces) 'IL Photo E3 1 � Phom E2 '-�. ._I aenMwa msein.nl t SiTE PLAN rmp4 r•w4 0' 30' 60' 120' 7 I 2 i 3 I 4 Photo El fR RJL11 AlF1[MAi, i�- 9rA.r.r' ?•^...a.. .'rL�.n. I 5 S PMIN "P,lw 9Fwi1LE, wn 9a101 I06 97 3 1JOn y`,.w1[wlepnPepu 0 O .c ci y N o s= v 3 3 M 3 N 0 � i r w� d m3 LL. LL R sak�oe�ae No DnaiEan Dale 1 =111l dt]Reta Reyr annq AUMn /S (F� aK6w" - Dmw.p No A000 �,� d