00-103242 •
.
• '
City of
l Way
Community
DDeev elopment
Services Building - Single F ' y ' rmit I 0 - 103242 - 00 - SF
33530 1st Way S
Federal Way,WA 98003-6210 I, t ectio equest line: 253.661.4140
Ph:253.661.4000 Fax:253.661.4129 — — — — — — — —
� is
�, filrspecti-ons�"——
Project Name: WONG
Project Address: 30521 28TH A Parcel Number: 092104 9092
Project Description: NSF-Constru new le fa 'ly re accessory parking spaces; includes plumbin &
mechanical. * 'ropos sale e:$ 0,000-2 bedrooms**
Owner plicant Contractor -•.er
Suzanne S.W. SUZA ONG NONE ne S. •ng
P.O.B s •.77 PO BOX 2: OX 77
SE• t 'WA 98118-8.77 SEATT W• :118 SE LE 9811' 77
1110.
Includes:
Census cat ory: 101 -New si #4
Occupancy R-3 R-3 0111
Construction ype: Type V- Type V
Occupancy Load:
Floor Area(Sq.Ft.):
1st Floor Proposed Sq.Feet 621 2nd ..r Proposed Sq.Fee 6
Basic Plan No Cens •tegory .... 101 -New single family houst
Construction Type#2 -N Deck Proposed S F 76
Height of Structure Mechanical Yes
Occupancy Group#1 3 Occupancy Group R-3
Other Proposed Sq.Feet Plumbing Yes
Total Building S eet l Proposed Sq.Fe 1373
Zoning Designatio
Plu tur
D scriptio nUty y s Quan ity X ° Descript on jQuantity
Dishwashers 1 La ry er 1 Bathtubs 2
Lavatories 2 Wa e l Sinks 1
Water Closets 2
echanical Fixtures
(Quant! Quantity
,..Description � p !Quart* �"
�rD�scn t>c�n�:, �, � • �scrlpt�otl ,��;�� ��:
Fans 2 Ducts 1 Furnaces 1
Gas Piping 1 Hoods 1 Ranges 1
CONDITIONS:
1.No building shall encroach onto any building setback line or easement shown or not shown.
2.Maximum building height is 30 feet above the average building elevation as per Federal Way City Ordinance
#90-51.
3.The Driveway shall be paved per section 22-1453 of the Federal Way City Code. The driveway shall be paved
from the existing roadway pavement edge,or curb,to the garage or carport.
4.Maximum driveway width is 20 feet.
5.Building setbacks are:20 feet front;5 feet side;5 feet rear.
6.Pursuant to section 20.130.30 of the Federal Way Environmental Policy Ordinance,all mitigation measures of
the determination of nonsignificance are incorporated by reference as conditions of this approval. Failure to
comply with the mitigation measures shall constitute grounds for suspension and/or revocation of this approval.
7.Per Federal Way City Code section 22-1111(41.eaves.chimneys or awninuc. and similar elements of a ctructnre
•
that customarily extend beyond the exterior walls of a structure may extend up to inches"MAXIMUM" into
the required yard setback.
8.This decision shall not waive compliance with future city of Federal Way codes,policies,or standards relating
to the subject proposal.
PERMIT EXPIRES August 11,2001,IF NO WORK IS STARTED.
Permit issued on February 12,2001
I hereby certify that the above information is correct and that the construction on the above described property and
the occupancy and the use will be in accordance with the laws,rules and regulations of the State of Washington and
the City of Federal Wa .
Owner or agent: [A) Date: 1, 0 I
PO. THIS CARD ON THE FRONT OF BUIL1 •
anar
BUIL_ 1G DIVISION
INSPECTION RECORD
- nvgPkCTrp►>v>RRiirri CT a.t situ iyj fi7 gig
Request must be received by 3:30 PM for next day inspection
PERMIT#: 00-103242-00-SF
OWNER'S NAME: Suzanne S.Wong
SITE ADDRESS: 30521 28TH S
( ) FOOTINGS/SETBACKS ( ) FOUNDATION WALL
• •
s 5
._. `�x ., ,. .,. . • �. ,N '� ,. t„ v<..,„sue.,<.<. .��, .,�. ... �h o _ ,. ! ..� ,_, i<v .,n, vi._ ,��„,:
() DRAINAGE: Line () Connection
( ) UNDERFLOOR FRAMING
( ) ROUGH PLUMBING: DWV Water piping
() ROUGH MECHANICAL Gas piping
( ) SHEATHING Roof Floor
( ) SHEAR WALLS
( ) ELECTRICAL ROUGH-IN Ditch Cover
O FIRE/DRAFTSTOPS
tr
r VW
( ) FRAMING/FIRESTOPPING
4X k:,„1,:, f , d d ?(_), ",q 3 r 9`y q�: e;� , . +i rA. w ® evk
( ) INSULATION: Floors Walls Attic
1- ;: fki._.1 1 �' � s � g J$ 6i fir
() WALLBOARD NAILING () SUSPENDED CEILING
( ) ELECTRICAL FINALAIIIIIPM111,1111111111ft
( ) PLANNING FINAL
( ) PUBLIC WORKS FINAL
( ) FIRE FINAL
( ) BUILDING FINArNIIMII
�.. "� xar r w na dt' `��
gg, f
1 v�ss �a �3 i ' .go-, 3�,,.��%''��LK 3 e: ' .( .e r n /` " ` ' $ J/..�• 5 1
?%.a.,�r. eS, si, .cr-. s. ,¢�j . n. 'w'Al.4P -0 t, �r;.w! . 2t.5. ;_.^�f4 �`i1.6� � •�'�?,7D d, � f, . Ar , �n, y� ,.£�„CYA6"T sa
•
BUILDING DIVISION
33530 First Way South
�E L J '9t. RECEIVED"D Federal Way.WA 98003
(253)661-4000
Fax(253)661-4129
2000
CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
APPLICATIOIWKWEETUILDING PERMIT
PLEASE PRINT APPLICATION#c% /03Z42-00 " SF
5C�'�: :fl:<:'`::.,:....;. ;::::::>:: :;�::<:;>:•..>::::.:;::�:.:,.::. Site address O524 2� —. -dAke6 /77 f-
Tenant name Lot# 9`Z. Assessor's Tax#
Building Owner's Name 5'tC ,e 5..(JeiN/ Address
j7 � D
X-27677 q io17f 9 .
City Vih'ZT� 'State IVA- Zip g0/l7'1677 IPhone -(,Z ,/OV
Description of Work i . 'A1&,6 74U/Ii'f uc j
,APPMANtaggingMeNninga_
Name (F,M,L) ��L��/I16911
Address /S"/I // %JC��,City ,S'4 77i. - State N• Zip 91//'5-7 .5
Contact Person Day Phone �L�2�(� Other Phone Fax
BTU1W1N etiNtaAtitiRanoSMO Federal Way Business Licens
e #
Company Name e/�i�e�
Address (/�
City State Zip
Contact Person Phone Fax
Contractor's #(card must be presented) Expiration Date Verified 0 Yes 0 No
Name m ji4J ( `aef--Ai2celIT&
Address /y�--/e,/.•�--//r/dA �/Vg� G T' /
City g /7/L w State W' Tipgff/'/9—J7'dS-'.
Contact Person Gil `L„0 / Phone _w 2724'2-VS- Fes, ✓-,213 01 fr
LEGAL DESCRIPTION s rt7r.
Please Complete Reverse Side
ExistingUse Proposed Use j/)1/01.ri r111A1t-✓
RE > ;; <<� >'�;�<«`>': <>": <»iiiii•.<:':>��s:,.:r:;:<:..:%
Permit includes: ,'Building Plumbing EKAechanical 0 Other i
Type of Work: Residential New 0 Remodel Z<#of bedrooms Deck
0 Commercial 0 Addition/ ❑ Re air 0 Garage 0 Shed
Enter let Floor b"-Zi sq ft 2nd Floor bhc /sq ft "ar•Fioor_ sq ft Existing Floor Area sq ft
Area Basement sq ft Decks 16 sq ft Garage sq ft Proposed Total Area )i 37,E 11s��q ft
Water Availability Sewer Availabili On-Site Septic System
Availability 0 Project Valuation $ Jr.�j06d
Zoning F5--7.7- Lot Size 4"5� SrExisting Bldg Valuation $ -0/—
•
'.�:...::::.::u...'ii'i:'iiiii:::::::::;:i :i::>:.,:•::.:i:;<ii:: �::::.:..:
l
TNtiR` RS '« « M« SStii :, For new residential only- Proposed selling cost: $
Name Address
City State I ZIP
:<':;::i::iiiii::,::::iiiii:):::::::i::2:iiiii'::i:iiiiii*ivir•ii::ir i*:::I i::i'f':i
ViEettARICALCONTRACCCOMMOM
Contractor Name 6lry Address
City State Zip
Contact Phone Fax
License # Expiration Date - Verified 0 Yes 0 No
iiiii:•:. ...:�.............�.:
P�UM 111.111[M ONTRACTOR>`�•::I %''•.`'s:< >'^'°
Contractor Name b WNere __. Address
City State Zip
Contact Phone Fax
License # Expiration Date Verified 0 Yes 0 No
iiiii.... ,. . .. ::..:.....:.. .:.;.. ,.. .
PLUMBING:>FIXTURE COUN' ::•<.ss:<::<::<€c�'s:<:;<::
Water Closets . .. Sinks / Urinals 0 Lawn Sprinklers O
Bathtubs ...-- Dish Washers / Drinking Fountains d Other
/
Showers 0 Electric Water Heaters Sumps 0
':; <�»>'
Lavatories Washing Machine Drains 0 TOl al F 400.0ju� :;: <:<.; _:
MECHANICAL;ON Ujy' � /.n' `:.'< MECHANICAL EVALUATION ONLY $
• Fuel Type (gas/electric/other) 6/"r� Gas Dryer / Air Handling < = 10,000 CFM 15-30 Tons
Length of Gas Piping j Range Air Handling > = 10,000 CFM 30-50 Tons
Furn <100K BTUs i t Gas Log Unit Heater 50+ Tons
Furn >100 BTUs Fans V-" Miscellaneous Fuel Tanks
Gas Hwt / Hood / Boilers Above Ground
Cony Burner 4.7 Duct Work 0-3 Tons Underground
BBQ's 0 Wood Stoves O '3-15 Tons Total Unit Cgunt <>>'
DISCLAIMER:I certify under penalty of perjury that the information furnished by me is true and correct to the best of my knowledge,and further,that I am authorized by the owner of
the above premises to perform the work for which permit application is made.I further agree to save harmless the City of Federal Way as to any claim(including costs,expenses,and
attorneys'fees incurred in investigation and defense of such claim),which may be made by any person,including the undersigned,and filed against the City of Federal Way,but only
where such claim arises out of the reliance of the city,including its officers and employees,upon the accuracy of the information supplied to the city asas a pap of this application.
Owner/Agent: / Date: f/F 1��
REva[0 Sl ta/MJ
CITY OF =
•
E1:1
� � CITY HALL
33530 1st Way South (253) 661-4000
PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
April 12,2002
Ms. Suzanne Wong
PO Box 28677 Fl
Seattle, WA 98118
Re: File No's 00-103242-000-00-SF& SMP95-0004; EXPIRATION OF SHORELINE VARIANCE
Wong;30521 28th Avenue South
Dear Ms. Wong:
This correspondence is to notify you that the shoreline variance approved under city file number SMP95-
0004 and UPR95-0025 expired on March 22,2002, six years following final permit approval. The
shoreline variance for file SMP95-0004 received final approval by the Department of Ecology on March
22, 1996. Pursuant to Washington Administrative Code(WAC) 197-27-090"...authorization to conduct
development activities shall terminate five years after the effective date of a shoreline permit. Provided
that local government may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on
reasonable factors... "The related permit under file UPR95-0025 is also subject to the same six-year
permit limitation as referenced above,and has expired.
As identified on the stop work order for the project issued by the city on April 8,2002,construction on
the proposed residence under file number 00-103242-000-00-SF must cease because the shoreline permit
has expired. In order to continue work on a single-family residence at the site,a new shoreline variance
and associated approvals must be submitted to the city for review and approval. In order to apply for
appropriate shoreline variance permit applications to construct a single-family residence at the site,the
information on the enclosed application submittal checklist must be provided to the city. A non-
refundable application fee of$2,827.00 is required for the shoreline variance application.The shoreline
variance process requires a Hearing Examiner public hearing,and the Washington State Department of
Ecology has the final decision authority for the shoreline variance.
In addition to the information provided above, based on an inspection of the site by city staff on April 5,
2002, it appears that the information submitted for the shoreline variance in 1996 may not have accurately
represented the ordinary high water(OHW)for determining the building structural setback as required
under the Shoreline Management Act,or that conditions have since changed. The April 5,2002, inspection
by city staff identified that several of the markers which identify the"line of vegetation"depicted on the
site plan are actually within the lake,and appear to be water ward of the shoreline OHW mark.
The new submittal for a shoreline variance and associated approvals must include a survey that accurately
represents the shoreline OHW mark as defined in RCW 90.58.030(enclosed). I suggest that you contact
me to arrange a time to meet on-site to determine the actual OHW mark,or alternatively,you may hire an
independent shoreline consultant to determine the OHW mark, which city staff will field verify.The
property survey must be stamped by a land survey licensed in the State of Washington.
Ms. Suzanne Wong
Page 2
April 12,2002
The city's shoreline setback requirements have been amended by the city council since the time of the
1996 shoreline variance. A new shoreline permit application is subject to regulations currently in effect.
The city's single-family shoreline residential setback requirements are detailed in Federal Way City Code
(FWCC)Section 18-165(d)(enclosed). In summary,given the characteristics of the parcel,a variance to
the current shoreline setback standards will be required for construction of a single-family residence.
A variance to FWSectipn 22-1332 may also be required,regarding a 25-foot setback from a regulated
lake.An administrative reduction tothe required 25-foot regulated lake setback may be approved under
FWCC Section 22-1334(4); howevet,,city staff is unable to determine compliance with this standard.
Additional site plan information must be provided including proposed shoreline setback and identification
of footprint of residences on both abutting properties. If the proposed residence does not comply with the
setback identified in FWCC Section 22-1334,then a Process IV Hearing Examiner variance to the 25-foot
regulated lake setback is required. If applicable,the regulated lake setback variance would be processed
simultaneously with the shoreline variance hearing.
State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)compliance for the proposal is also required because the proposed
residence is located within an environmentally sensitive area(regulated lake setback). However, it
appears a new SEPA checklist is not required,as city staff has preliminarily determined that the previous
SEPA documents are likely adequate for SEPA compliance. Further city staff evaluation of the proposal
may necessitate additional SEPA review.
Please be advised that building permit number 00-103242-000-00-SF will expire on September 27,2002,
unless a written request for a six-month extension is submitted to the city's Building Official by
September 27,2002.
In order to expedite processing the necessary applications,a new preapplication meeting for the project is
optional. If you choose to opt out of a preapplication process,you must request this in writing,as
described in FWCC Section 22-1653. I have provided a detailed"development checklist"for your use in
assembling an application for the proposal if you choose to request an exemption from the preapplication
process. Please reference all applicable code citations and provide all information identified on the
enclosed development checklist handout.
Prior to submitting applications for a new shoreline variance and associated applications, please contact
me to arrange a meeting to discuss the shoreline variance application requirements and the status of the
existing work that has been performed at the site. You may contact me weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m.at 253-661-4019.
Sincerely,
/j6W\;
Harris
Senior Planner
enclosures
c: Greg Fewins,Deputy Director of Community Development Services
Mary Kate Martin,Building Official
Clark Waters,Building Inspector
File#00-103242-000-00-SF Doc.1.D.18628
CITY OF r •
•+ ECIEJZFIL.. BUILDING DIVISION
33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 66 1 -4000
CORRECTION NOTICE
ADDRESS: 3C252 t ZL b A. 1/C+. s PERMIT #: 00- /D 3Z1/2--od-4F
VIOLATIONS OF CITY AND/OR STATE LAWS ARE LISTED BELOW:
CD C.Ne p p ev•, / Go, Li, 3 OF
0 5l0LP I,) Vt A(At P ka S —X(JI'Vasf
(e, A v t J ua 1ri ct✓11..� 4 0, U �.
f.y. V(id Q_ C.D
u . `d LA. vvt 4 ci ' \ear ✓_✓c- Q.
44. 4 o ram,,
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT NO MORE WORK SHALL BE APPROVED UPON THESE PREMISES UNTIL THE
ABOVE VIOLATIONS ARE CORRECTED. WHEN CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, CALL 66 1-4 1 40 FOR
RE-INSPECTION.
° egt....t.A616L>
DATE INSPECTOR FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
CITY OF G MEMORANDUM
Community Development Services Department
33530 1 ST WAY SOUTH
DATE: April 3, 2002
FROM: Jim Harris Clal
t(( G �
tj{
SUBJECT: WONG - (00-103242-00-SF) 0'"� f
30521 28TH AVE S
10/5/95 Shoreline Variance request submitted to city for 1,800 square foot single family
residence with 5 foot setback from lake.
11/16/95 DNS issued for proposal.
12/28/95 Process I administrative approval signed for setback reduction on regulated lake.
2/27/96 Hearing Examiner approves 15 foot setback variance to allow construction of SFR 5
feet from lake SDP with variance via Process II procedure.
2/27/96 Shoreline permit sent to DOE dated 2-27/96(with expiration date 2/27/01)
3/22/96 DOE letter concurring with shoreline permit(final approval)
2/25/97 Wong requests extension of Process II variance.
3/10/97 City grants one year extension to expire 2-27-98 (to HEX 2/27/96 decision)
1/23/98 SFR building permit application submitted to city BLD98-0034
6/23/98 Six month extension to BLD98-0034 granted to expire 1/30/99.
2/2/99 BLD98-0034 cancelled/expired. {
31a11111 1,4 -b. Now @ laLf1 cc., i
pi
6/8/00 New SFR permit submitted to city 00-103242 sf. c` r�
y • 2/12/01 SFR permit 00-103242-sf issued.
ex v
7/30/01 00-103242-sf extended to 2/7/02.
2/7/02 First inspection requested for file 00-103242-sf.
4;710- ItAfn' FK.'l(LU•1 "Lji
�.
113_ 7 -0 (2 )c tieP4 sLe, c "4 wl ,N a y„,,
o � e iadi v-t di. o` (Lc>t0.,1 ( 3 Z 2 -1,y) (I,a d� ✓K P, rA %I)
1 3 - - O IV 62)1 ) IL L41 SL4ii hAH1.' 4
r:vt. y{�/, I( hJt dC411- 4 eov,S 1 yr c )
W p✓5S.. .•,of►ct p h c ODE (el,, 3(.24o2)
Rat.S.�..r?- --7(24
11 3 - 3 7 .G E C/ (6) c kw„ h> �f'�-c I" I, o IL1/4.
a�{�►�ii',<r1 bi ��,, �, sty �, n-e p`"fj
LA S 70 Dd,evi.k i p\c pt"A-c 4i 3 — C 1 t At c,.J q, Led",--, 64:id p IJt,i Srp4
9,14('4 c of Het; d
] Ao n� Ne — f�.�� k.-�uw,�y I r �,�lti'{� s MP
\-11\.AA s so4] 1
lioVu/P"A.L.-
'Ye I.cc,,ikon,
/" I•akr% M'i 14PN.)(-.t-r0/1 ai�ll� l
Se 11)1VLk 111\j( Se Z. i'c ci. S U 30 0(t ,
Of jAnw' AA6 ISoi �-c SL s µ ( J 1 Nt'�`'t dl V-44_14 ]poet
•
. r - t
•
OTT O? G
•' BUILDING DIVISION
33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 66 1 -4000
CORRECTION NOTICE
p5 . 1 Cor5
ADDRESS: 30 S Z I Z.8 ' 4-tJ•e -, PERMIT #: OO-/O 3Z91 -Oe -Sr-
VIOLATIONS OF CITY AND/OR STATE LAWS ARE LISTED BELOW:
h D v\ J/OA a‘5 YG.p4 z - nu h 7 -J
`� �✓� ��G.v ptav c ,f• Ac. • S vG. , �/ 4� . 4 . T
•
�4 --�, d-- .�
Vq1A-1 ) 1 V•.e_ ekt( e:›*-P --F45 # ?;:t2)11A.vtiet,7 %A..)
IV\Sp 4-4ov`.
LA) k e o.b n�/� �4 - s 1i. a ' J/ /427,.
0 Vo—+ p 0 c4 v. tdit/Lig' 6i 6erA/42-
vN s p p +►o s c`2p,-t7 c /
k tij
2s3 - 66/- 6 S
You ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT NO MORE WORK SHALL BE APPROVED UPON THESE PREMISES UNTIL THE
ABOVE VIOLATIONS ARE CORRECTED. WHEN CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, CALL 661-41 40 FOR
RE-INSPECTION.
Lk' 0 L.0 C/e-di
DATE INSPECTOR FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
cITYof G
EMEfFiL— BUILDING DIVISION
�N) 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 661 -4000
CORRECTION NOTICE
.n , Zof
ADDRESS: ,3W 2 I / e AtJe, 5 , PERMIT #: 470"/o32.'?� -Oc.. .
VIOLATIONS OF CITY AND/OR STATE LAWS ARE LISTED BELOW:
6;DD f� `� cJov'k o ���vas Gtd (4 a tM-s ,..74c
1/,e'ecvee,c1 + povs 5 - t, ICur a?;ot&. e--5/J
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT NO MORE WORK SHALL BE APPROVED UPON THESE PREMISES UNTIL THE
ABOVE VIOLATIONS ARE CORRECTED. WHEN CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, CALL 661-41 40 FOR
RE-INSPECTION.
DATE INSPECTOR FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
I .
n- % . .
CitY
•� G
--A- BUILDING DIVISION
33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
FEDERAL WAY, WA 96003 661 -4000
CORRECTION NOTICE
ADDRESS: ....70V, II 028-614A API-C. 5 PERMIT : -C3-91d304°2
/
VIOLATIONS OF CITYsc4ND/OR STATE LAWS ARE LISTED BELOW:
4 •
libe6.3 iAe// k /J45Q 474 4/1 �i i i
'-
W .e4003/AA_ Celiejiedr, / .che// 1
06) 04- 0/1 11111--e. ‘.4,..
nool- 10...alt Fan11,, liz Cals4 !led-- ed)49,144,4,
rW 6 d'/ "a
eP 4p// , 4 hart_
1+`/ '1 ce40,444. A,..._
h )erktrarA , /
-
1
1
I
/
/ /
You ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT NO MORE WORK SHALL BE APPROVED UPON THESE PREMISES UNTIL THE
ABOVE VIOLATIONS ARE CORRECTED. WHEN CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, CALL 66 1-41 40 FOR
RE-INSPECTION.
4/7/61-""C (540 7# 47 *'/ '3
DATE INSPECTOR FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
•
1 •
CIT'OF
I: ED BUILDING DIVISION
VS 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 66 1 -4000
CORRECTION NOTICE
ADDRESS: 3 . Z/ U /I‹ - PERMIT #: at,---63,j -"-
VIOLATIONS OF CITY AND/OR STATE LAWS ARE LISTED BELOW:
(7il/ 4il 'C 414# Ma /. /` �T/ A.Mt° .:
1 1 5 s h // ,e. 1 p I2t 4QL
iecc lior_44A;,AA_,
6 1'N1S /iI- cv -,0, S 74 h,-e. di iip°0dL
[MU 1*06
0) , ,e. ,...--, ' (P 440....4,11. p LA_ 04) i- _ ev Pk-
6 eld (is<0 5-4/ 744446 « j f'
A* )1t/ i ✓-c5 le5 hslc•t I, de Ca,
ft)....." 4°71- /1,Al-C, 0,1,,Y t if 72 er-124,
e.- 'Iv /-2.70 X Ce,1 if--.14.
0 ile-e_til/ ileal /,yfee-cki,• / #‘ /tool- /*Air , e,a7<,..-S
You ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT NO MORE WORK SHALL BE APPROVED UPON THESE PREMISES UNTIL THE
ABOVE VIOLATIONS ARE CORRECTED. WHEN CORRECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE, CALL 66 1-41 40 FOR
RE-INSPECTION.
zky,',z___ ,/ G /f -/f '
i , DATE INSPECTOR FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE
CITY OF =
• 0 py
Nin d=r, CITY HALL
33530 1st Way South (253) 661-4000
PO Box 9718 Federal Way,WA 98063-9718
June 17, 2003
Suzanne S Wong
PO Box 28677
Seattle WA 98118-8677
RE: Permit#00-103242-SF; WONG - EXPIRED PERMIT
30521 28th Ave S., Federal Way,WA 98003
Dear Ms. Wong:
Building permit 00-103242-SF for construction of a residence at the above referenced address
has expired by limitation and cannot be renewed. Construction of the foundation and all
constructed elements of the structure must now be removed and the lot stabilized against
erosion or hazards.
Please contact me before the end of June about developing a plan and timetable for completing
this required work. It may be possible to enter into a Voluntary Correction Agreement to
complete the required work that could prevent enforcement action. I can be reached directly at
253-661-4121 or via e-mail at www.martin.nordby0ci.federal-way.wa.us.
Sincerely,
a n Nordby, CCEO
Code Compliance Officer
C: Kari Cimmer, Lead Development Specialist
Doc.I.D. 23525
CITY OF G
F.
�v CITY HALL
33530 1 st Way South (253)661-4000
• May 20, 2003 PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
Suzanne S. Wong
PO Box 28677
Seattle, WA 98118-8677
RE: 00-103242-00-SF; WONG
30521 28th Avenue S; Expiration of Permit; Notice for Inspection
Our records indicate that on Monday, July 30, 2001 a request for extension of permit
00-103242-00-SF was submitted to the City of Federal Way. The building official
extended the time for work to commence by 180 days based on that request. Since
your permit may not be extended more than once, it will expired by limitation in
accordance with the provisions of Uniform Building Code Section 303(d) on Sunday,
June 8, 2003.
To avoid expiration of your permit, you may call the inspection request line (253-835-
3050) to set up an inspection by Friday, June 6, 2003.
If you choose not to request an inspection for this permit, your permit will become null
and void on Monday,June 9, 2003. Your expired plans, if applicable, will be retained
for an additional 30 days, should you wish to use them for resubmittal. Work shall not
continue at any time after expiration of the permit until a new permit is obtained.
If you have any questions, please call 253-661-4115.
Sincerely,
!MR !Martin
Building Official
cc: Freeman Fong Architects;Attn: Freeman Fong; 1514—11th Avenue W;Seattle,WA 98119-3205
file
fdtlidit
Pe71160'
111 • _ _ _ . _ ___ _ _ _________ __ —___ _ _ _ _ __ __
I 1 0
t 0.
0204REC 400
EIV —
. _
4 .
-•. JUL 2 6 7cirm
.„ CI f Y OP F=D
.-- AL wAy /
/
BUILDING DEPT.
-.
•
i
1•4 :112-.----, '''24 --*'°It&'i."4 1 4447144".":;/ _ _
.....4
4111(2 r11121.44 - 491.441444" 941 irfe.-•••,deirterierte...
. •-•• t /
_ _ ,-,. ia.41(..e•
-.."e/L'&14.4.01 - Sbr.:.• Z;te. ... 2,44C-411.'4./ Ate41....
,1-e_10,r-pt„.. e__
_ .
t....
,
-.144 •AtX••••...!I.iltik .3%. Adeektlei:•4.11../0444k 7fceS
- .I •
- 4-4 it's't644("Aedette lyerl....
4.1"4....k
I li
. -•• -
'•I
;I
•,.
,I
I I I
I . _eP 0;07_ .Anilb
-44
.., , _ ... . . _.-
-•I f
I .
- -- .4 -
t--t
..•
• I . -
I I I
I,1
;I
. ..
CITY OF G
\v CITY HALL
33530 1 st Way South (253)661-4000
PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
November 17,2000
FILEFreeman Fong Architects
1514- l lth Avenue W
Seattle, WA 98119-3205
RE: Permit#00-103533-000-00-SM; WONG
30521—28th Avenue S; Right of Way Modification
Dear Mr. Fong:
This letter responds to your request to waive the required street improvements along 28th Avenue S
associated with the proposed single-family residence.
After evaluating the existing conditions along 28th Avenue S, review of Federal Way City Code
(FWCC)provisions (Sections 22-1473 through 1477 and 22-1524), and the direction provided by the
City Council, the Public Works Department hereby grants your request to waive the requirements for
street improvements applicable to your permit application,as discussed below.
FWCC Section 22-1477 Modification of Improvements Along Property Frontage: This code section
allows the Public Works Director to grant a request to modify, defer, or waive the required street
improvements only after consideration of four specific reasons. The reasons most applicable here are
as follows:
(1) The improvements as required would not be harmonious with existing street
improvements.
(2) Unusual topographic or physical conditions preclude the construction of the
improvements as required.
The approved right of way section for 28th Avenue S is cross-section "K", which requires 22 feet of
pavement (centerline to curb), curb, gutter, a six-foot-wide planter strip with street trees, an eight-
foot-wide sidewalk, and streetlights within a 78-foot wide right of way. Application of the required
street improvements would result in an improved roadway section that is not harmonious with
existing street improvements which consist of approximately 22 feet of paved roadway, a four-foot-
wide paved shoulder, and no drainage ditch, sidewalk, curb or gutter. As a result, the required street
improvements are waived.
A nine-foot-wide right of way dedication would eventually be required to achieve full right of way
improvements. The proposed single-family home would need to be redesigned to meet parking and
front yard setback requirements. Most of the homes along this portion of 28th Avenue S would be
similarly affected by a nine-foot right of way widening, which may preclude future construction.
Topography on and adjacent to the site will further complicate future construction. Due to the
physical and topographical conditions in this area, the applicant is not required to provide the full
dedication width. A two-foot-wide right of way dedication is required along 28m Avenue S for
public right of way. The applicant is also required to execute a Local Improvement District (LID)
Waiver of Protest Covenant in the event that a future LID is formed to make street improvements.
The necessary documents are enclosed for the owner's signature. Please sign, notarize, and returned
them to the City with a $19.00 check for recording fees made payable to King County Records and
Elections, prior to issuance of a building permit. The applicant must attach a legal description to
both documents.
The conditions of this right of way modification will be applicable for one year from the date of this
letter. If a building permit is not issued within the one-year time limit,the right of way modification
will be void and a new request for modification must be submitted.
If you have any questions,call Ann Dower,Engineering Plans Reviewer,at(253)661-4125.
Sincerely,
Ken Miller, P.E.
Deputy Public Works Director
KM/AD j if
enclosure Local Improvement District Waiver of Improvement Covenant
Statutory Warranty Deed
cc Tr t Ward,Development Services Manager
oject File(AD)
Day File
l:csdc\docs\save\09634950.doc
RESUBMITIED
November 13,2000 NOV 2 0
2008
Attn: Ann Dower n
_,
Re: Permit#00-103242-000-00-SF-WONG
30521 28th Ave S,Public Works Review
Ann Dower,
In compliance with your request dated September 26, 2000,the site plan has been revised to
reflect your requested information
The bioswale is shown in the site plan along the north side of the SFR. The top edge shall be
located at the discharge point of the floatable material separator.The bottom edge extends west to
the perimeter of the lake. Due to space limitations,the swale consumes the area between the
structure and the property line. On the right side of the site plan,the requested profile of the
swale is shown,indicating a total width of 5 ft,bottom width of 2 ft, 3:1 side slopes and a total
depth of 0.5 ft. The seed mixture for the swale was obtained from the KCSWDM,Table 6.3.1.C.
The drawings have been signed and stamped.
The scales have been referenced on the drawing.
The purpose of the outlet protection at the southwest corner of the SFR is to help minimize
stormwater erosion during the construction process. Due to the proximitiy to Steel Lake, I felt
additional erosion control measures,beyond the silt fence, was prudent.
If you have any questions on the attached site plan,please call me.
Russell La ay PE
360-403-9922
S R WON (: RES/ «l CE
DETE.V ltJE RUNOFF FAL5M DRI Uo 1,0 * Sl u
AsS L'I/J r 5waLE
DRiVEw/11
(2_ ) i( =_- /IC
T?7rAk L. - a 36 leis
= 0, O I , $,c
90 ( /,"/17 Avato. O 19 G)
0Z0 C..-F'S
\IaC /M n
for 2y r Z4k - s ern ( ? KCSv3DNA Pad 3- 13 )
- a ) ( i . s X((. . 3 )
I . 4-
/ 3
SFR ReszceivcE.
svJk.LE SieINC�
DUE TO SITE CEOMETi2Y, p 120X/M/TY 7 ADJACENT" P' c ' iY,
vTiL.)TY EASEMENTS AND TORn eAPH' AL LIMlTATOA!S
S uJA L SHALL 86 S r EW TO P'rT Si re EDNA/TiOAI S .
kSSUME, -
SwAL6 8O77pu) LiiI '' = Z.1
SIDE 5C PE S 3 / 3
SLOPE = O.O2
FeDM KGSV)tM p. b-3%
3/5
1.49 5°'5 b
O , 0ao c,fs (0. 28) o'er
1,4, (0,02)4s — 0,O7 S CC
ti ,9 't
DES*CAI FLow VELOC_tTY
V = =
by + Z.� z
(2.)0,07-5) + 3(0 .o3s')Z = 0. ) Z fps
SFk R6siDaivcd
CALco LATE SWAN LE LEA,4 TN
= s40 (.\ )
540 (0, I Z) _ lo
RoVJEvE.2 - SITE DMETRy DOES NOT Ac.c..OW 5(.),)ALE
1.-.Em61 T y &BEAT&R Tit/Avg 30'.
:. REa UEST ,7ov&eJu/Ny /364 ut.A.7V A-4EAIC y
To 67i2,cAvT VARtk,A1C6 Fort T///S SP&
344- 403- 99Z
4,04 T,.
7.4
EXPIRES 10/3/O2_ ._ �...._ I
3
3
August 16,2000
Ken_Miller,Deputy Public Works Director
City of Federal Way
ATTN: Trent Ward,Development Services Manager
RE Permit#00-103242-000-00-SF-WONG
30521 —28th Ave S;Public Works Review
Page 2 of 2
situation,as it would appear to passing cars that the pedestrians were walking into traffic,thus causing
some drivers to impulsively swerve to avoid hitting them. Providing such a short sidewalk in front of
the subject property only gives pedestrians on this busy street a false sense of security and may,in fact
put them in more danger than they would be in just walking along the median strip.
As stated in Section 22-1477 of the FWCC,a waiver of these requirements may be granted if
"2. Unusual topographic or physical conditions preclude the construction of improvements as
required." As also shown in the attached photographs,the subject property drops quite steeply from
the street. Since this condition appears to be true with the rest of the properties in the neighborhood,it
would be impractical to make such improvements. The steep drop at the edge of the property would
make the required planting strip and sidewalk improvements difficult to develop and construct and
would require a lot of filling.
We conclude that the required frontage improvements are not harmonious with existing street
improvements,would not function properly or safely,would not be advantageous to the neighborhood
or'City as a whole,plus the unusual topographic/physical conditions of the site preclude feasible
construction costs. We ask you to waive these required frontage improvements.
We look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
FREEEMAN FONG ARCHITECTURE,PS
Freeman Fong,AIA
FF:lw
Att.
cc: Suzanne Wong
August 16,2000
Ken Miller,Deputy Public Works Director
City of Federal Way
ATTN: Trent Ward,Development Services Manager
RE Permit#00-103242-000-00-SF-WONG
30521 —28th Ave S;Public Works Review
-Attachment -
* .. i
irttk,
I .
,°"ft , .; Subject Property
30521 - 28th Ave S
ir. _ ! , . 35-foot Street Frontage
View looking North along 28th Ave S
I
Street Right-of-Way of
Subject Property -n_,
30521 - 28th Ave S
View looking South along 28th Ave S
CITY OF
`� (253) 661-4000
�/ � 33530 1ST WAY SOUTH FEDERAL WAY,WA 98003-6210
July 11, 2000
Suzanne Wong
PO Box 28677
Seattle, WA 98118
Fl
l.z
E
Re: Permit #00-103242-000-00-SF - WONG
30521 —28th AVE S; Public Works Review
Dear Ms. Wong:
In reviewing your application for a Building Permit, the Public Works Department has identified the
following items that must be addressed prior to receiving a permit:
1. 28th Avenue South along the property frontage does not meet current City street standards.
Street improvements, in accordance with Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Article XVI.
IMPROVEMENTS, Section 22-1473 — 1474, must be installed as a condition of this Building
Permit. Required improvements for this lot would include street widening to 22 feet of pavement
(centerline to curb), curb, gutter, six-foot wide planter strip with street trees, eight-foot wide
sidewalk, and street lights.
FWCC Sec. 22-1477 allows the Public Works Director to modify, defer, or waive the requirements
of this article only after consideration of a written request from the owner for the reasons stated
in the enclosed handout "Right of Way(ROW)Improvement Modification Request"
If you wish to seek modifications to the required frontage improvements, and feel that one or
more of the criteria for modification applies to this site, a written request should be sent to Ken
Miller, Deputy Public Works Director, at the address above. Please send the letter to the
attention of Trent Ward, Development Services Manager. A written response will be provided to
you.
2. The property is subject to a hearing examiner's decision dated 2/27/96 which requires specific
storm water treatment measures. The runoff generated from the driveway must be directed
through an oil/water separator and grass-lined biofitration swale prior to entering Steel Lake.
Roof runoff must be tightlined directly to Steel Lake. Please submit a site plan and details
depicting these improvements, along with supporting calculations.
If you have any questions, please call me at 253-661-4125.
Sincerely,
Ann Dower
AD:kc
enclosure
cc: Trent Ward,Development Services Manager
Tom Noble,Development Specialist
Project File/AD
Day File
Doc I.D. 10657
OTT EDC,E 0 SWALC I-eirporar J( v- tr m k\ be, 4O
a re.c ru not �o D ut (e f
' Profect- 0r) rock paciS
CONCRETE BULK /(E� r e 10 i .----, �" 1_t�N SF
V v . Ems`�M
•
1 X _
1 "I. I '' I ,-1,. l 1 f
X /
LINE of 1 SET5A4- �RD TOP DCj6 Or J /
CE J /✓C[vErATion/ ` I . CKASS ..SW ALE�f-- SwA D , �,+
1 l�Ir;. &otto wtdfh Z J I7f
��� ) LoNgt+LA ro I slope - I g to 6% \I :; '�,�.r,1.,e, �o s R�c7roN
3o�t ��t
STEEL L A K E I X \\\ )J I � ► EAJTR/t l\1 CE
, 7
DR I vE W/\ P/<C °%% '�'� ,r. 10' X �o'
,, I �e cK S F� l T 1, DIRECT 2uN. TO r �It"'����.- �f�.i e;'toof� 4"-C," Quarrt� Sf t,I Is
I 1 SEPhK/ATOIk ���ii�' °°.� I
a -, 7
FLoATAt3L ��
MATERIaL
-.I
Cr.iS - c." t/.//ckness
��\ \ SE PAA TO, •
0,C z-4"crushed rook\, \ 1� r o1& C7RRoEL BA
------)
pRoPEKTY
ri.
f Erill
EKISTINC� DOCK RD i 5 �.. LIME
('�' Il I�iii Ir
r • It P P
-----"-- :I-
/3.,1?>------"-----.
G Rg55 SWALE PAOrI L£
/> ------ k\'')'° Yz_" = l
0Swo&L acp D, 5-ct
..5/TE PL �s� pg t;A,y .,. ,)
— OP DUTI.ET PROTEETIOl\I \
- 1 •Ft /hick 9uorry SPOJI 5 X
SF'- S►LT FetiC6 •LL t 1230
(4)*- NOTES: C,2/ti5S SIUALE SEED MIXTU SAD/ P /JC7 c� Q.S�rv", -�"z 7
c�S - CoNSrIZUctlO� s\f�_._:ir��;'
44
• T/U//TL/NE Roar DRAINS DIRECTLY TO LAKE, FEf KCSc j '\ -F0}3L,E G .3,LC ST 4 -I �AnD� a-� '
IS - T n�-�-oe,ofar S��• FLo T t3LE MATERIfrL SEPAR�i OP PER 75-g0% T0,tt -Fescue EXPIRES 10/3/0Z
CITY OF EvEE T' 37 D PLro.! 410 Io -►s% C.PIonlai berAgrass or C _ T E.L n
• DAYLIC,HT SEPARATOR E.
OUTFA'LL 7o No2TH s/DE OF31 Seaside; Ci-e_e.pinq be."-t rasp HQtJsl_ 5 I EC. .n(�
• CY/ ASS LINED SWALE ON /�t0 Tft SIDE OF SF/, 5 -ID 1-0 REpTOP \J
• FIELD VER/Fy SErs1R..lTo� LocATl onj S F R _ __ 05 Z1_ __2_ . A uk
B*-' ve. So
OW►4ER.; SuSAN Wols4
piQEPARED ay ) uSSE(_L LA M4\y PC
ii
-• Lz
_ t rrporar v-th bty-m -{-a
direct outl�f
runoff 10
. CoNCRE76 BVC.K ,yE, ) ; , ,, -Y, o• r N S Prof cCh0n rOCIC pa,d
a
III /AO —)‹ xismit alimorsom...y-
S' X Oak",
LINE of TgA�x
✓E4E7/0ckeq 1 1J /
1 \ 1 1 441t%'94.
STEEL LAKE II X 1; V•I • (OAJ TR UCT(ON
I )� ���j f i FJ�1TR�/�1�
I
JS Fly \ , ; DR i vE w� PKC '•"% • , ' !a' X �o'
�, I,�id?rim. i I,
'�a.i'%gefyi ,%%: .. 4 -co any s liS
? Olv
\ 1 FO
1 C/3 S - C." Yhick-rm5s
vt o& ��NE . B^�
- •' - Fa
CX►ST/NC7 DaC K R D
v....4.4.:41:13=''''" ------ ----- ----" — API" Y-
7‘43
.43
• eV
s IT-E PEA
oP- OUTLET pAOTEGT10�1
_ 1 ct ,'h, 9Uarr & 11 (5 'A 9` Pad) F�ECE9VED —
y
3 F- SILT PadA)C ZOOO
.p..s _cops-mug-1 tq , 2AD/ P'` Nc7 JLJN O
ST c I L I v`Ti 04 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY
BUILDING DEPT.
HCOS aT STEEL LA•KE
SFR 3o52..l 2.8i".` Avs _ Souk
0 w►•1&2; S US ATf wo/46(
p2EPA\ker) SY RusSELL 1..AM4‘y pe
•
Drainate Assessment
Susan Wong
Single Family Residence
30521 28th Ave South
The proposed single family residence is located on the west side of Lake Steel,street address 30521 28th
Ave. South.The attached map shows site conditions as gathered by previous site surveys and investigations
(performed by others).This information was used as a guide to reference existing features and elevations.
The site review was performed on May 20th, 2000.The site is surrounded by a six-foot fence on three sides
and abuts Lake Steel on the west edge of the property.The site is overgrown with scrub-shrub vegetation,
primarily blackberry on the east half and cattails on the west half. Due to the extensive vegetative cover,
there were no visible stormwater treatment features on the site.The site clearly drains to the west via
natural overland flow and is filtered through the biofilteration processes associated with the brush.
The proposed SFR will abut Lake Steel, with a 5-foot setback from the lake and adjacent properties to the
north and south.The driveway and parking area will connect to 28th Ave South on the East Side(see
• attached plan). If possible, the driveway shall be crowned in the middle to allow runoff to the west, along
the north and south sides of the structure. Roof drains shall be place on the East Side of the residence to
direct runoff to run through the rock lined outlet protection areas on both sides of the SFR. Due to limited
lot size,proximity to the lake and the percent of impervious surface area created, ESC plans as per
KCSWDM,section D.5.3, were administered as deemed necessary.
The following temporary erosion control measures and associated BMP's will be implemented:
• If possible,the project shall occur during the dry season to minimize erosion potential and maximize
effectiveness of erosion control plan.
• Due to proximity to the lake,dewatering activities shall be avoided if possible. Any water generated by
dewatering shall be treated by pumping the water above the outlet protection areas on either side of the
SFR. A straw bale shall be placed around the discharge of the dewatering pump, above the outlet
protection rock areas,to aid in filtering sediment.
• Clearing limits will be to the property lines and delineated with silt/filter fencing.
• The driveway shall be constructed and graveled immediately. Armor a smaller area immediately
adjacent to 28th street with 4"to 6"quarry spall(approximately 10' by 10' area).Armor the additional
construction parking area with 6"thickness of 2"to 4" crushed rock(approximately 10' x 20')
Install rock lined outlet protection areas on the north and south sides of the house.The outlet protection
shall consist of quarry spall 1-foot thick, approximately 5' x 9' pad.
• Mulch will be spread over all cleared areas when they are'not being worked.
The shore of the lake should be protected with riprap or approved equal method of shoreline protection.
/"W
Russ Larmaya Y1i�
JUN A 8 20E1C
CI I Y U€ rtz—
BUILDIN$DEpT,'
1
_ _ - ___ _.__
��� (E) HOUSE ASPNAI_TIG CONCRETE
u DRIYEwaY,
= 432E z q TURN-AROUND V iii^�'° '
w �„mow. 0 PARKING FOR ONE CAR 1`4 i�' Q '
a CEO CONC BULKHEADinUii 11 , , (E) EXTRUQED ; a
CURB �,
LINE OF (E) VEGETATION 0 {'-U OPERTY LINE N8`i'S '43"W \ 60.5 ' // °
iiTi2j
1 93 cfuea \ 1 +►_� ,� _: lirmill \
N05'24'58"W I035 �\ i 25'-�" 4302 \ \, i \1 _ I�t \ i i MODIFY EXIST. k
N49'46'S9"E 2.46 i = :P '
i FENCE TO PROVO
�, ` 0*N �'' '1 NEW ENTRANCE I
`� DECK m �, a ��,� W'.�- � � ��
STEEL LAKEMAN FLOOR ��� ` , �� '_�_
N04'19'S2"E 6P0 'i 3 s TWO-STORY H __, r , i\11' I i, i .1.1761,
N01'21'32"W 3.43 i / 30521 - 28TN AVE S I ,
i
•,:/
FEDERAL WAY, WA 98501 ' i i �a N i °
! I +
MAIN FL EL = 430'-9" \' X i I. ,
9;; IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
al
N { , , 47
j \�' - DECK �� `�
UPPER FLOO `-1 �' . , ° I,
i , \ I --r iv/
IIIIIi4I221I 929 ' 2'30 '!l I ° -'' 10'-0" WIDE DRI WAY 42929 D 43011 y 4 .96 V i QIihJ N 3 0 WIDE CONC WALKW.4 1 I u I i I 1 ❑
CITY—.._._.._.._.._.._.._.._.. _.._.�. I / 0 111Q i STD6.00ENTER LI
_.._.._.._.._. .._.._.._.._.._._..�.. �' N ,I
(E) 5'-0" WIDE ��__PROPERTY LINE N81'43'S3'' .' 53.4:�- --
DOCK DRIVEWAY BETWEEN
�� TOP SEWER PROPERTY LINES
\\\ �_ M 4NNOVE ; (E) 6'-0" NIGH
N ; I.E. 425100 BOARD FENCE, TYP.
o) 0 ,tai.t i
/
vi.
i ce,-0" 3 Q
. - -AID C C
— �` ON1 ------- - -----_ _ _________ \'
�1.4Y
yr I .
I
'I 23'-8" (VERIFY /
SITE PLANth .
Pl!CEIVED
Q - I ;
s -
L , � JUN 0 8 2°°U
Gi BUILDING DEPT.
•S
aved
7. '3°5--Z -Z 1)-FL Ailii -5`
(E) HOUSE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
Imam }� DRIVEWAY, ,
= 432 6 z TURN-AROUND 4 �^)� IM
W
— 0 in `� '� PARKING FOR ONE CAR %7 q
(.._\)-,
1‘12Q \�� (E) EXTRUDED ; a(E) CON( BULKHEAD ! UY1 ;Nl , 1
_.._.._.._.._.._. a5 CURB
1t�OPERTY LINE N8`1'S:'43"W i 6D� - �� i "-
LINE OF (E) VEGETAT ON \ SET- 0 ► U ,
(NIGH TIDE WATER LI E) 4 \ gAG1C423 cwco \ it
I
Nm5"24'S8"W 1m35 \\ r• 43m2 \ 1 i 4
25'-0" / , MODIFY EXIST.
N49'46159"E 2.46 \ 1 = ` i FENCE TO PROVID
GONG \ ! , NEW ENTRANCE
DECK cp WALKWAY \ ! ti
STEEL LA m
\ / MAIN FLOOR `� ` i
N04.19'52"E 6.00 \\( „ �m TWO-Sro__ HOUSE ` '�
N01'21'32"W 3.43 I' 30521 - 287N AVE S +\ I \ :0 1 4.1
FEDERAL WAY, WA 985P-; ` \ , •
i i i
EDGE WATER i� DN MAIN FL EL = 43m'-9" 1- \� iI /, ' CO
i \
1\ CNI
N27"47'44"W 15.�6 i \ v_- = DECK 6 /' 1
—r I - ,
1 \ l'N UPPER FLOOR
DhIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIlIIIIIIIIhghIIIghIIIIIiii .2jii
� aN �_ " / IE3 O WIDE GONG DALKWA P ' u
- CITY OF FEDERAL
_.._..,. _.._.._.._._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._,.r.._, `n u1q STDS., CENTER
(E) 5'-(d" WIDE PROPERTY LINE N8�'43'S3"ll)''53.4: I' BE
DOCK - -- DRIVEWAY R LINE N
_ \\ / TOP SEWER , PROPERTY LINES'
\\ ,-'MANHOLE 7 (E) 6'-0" NIGH
N ,, - / ,' I.E. 425.00 BOARD FENCE, TYP.
cP Q / 1
al I
- EEO'-0,1 A
- ;. . . AID=ON' 1
1
3\epsA ' :\ '\ ' I
23'-8" (VERIFY)
Ak .
/ /
S(TE P1.- t'1 G
Mir ,
SCALE: I" = 10'-0" �---� S �
Feog (a V gl ?'2 _ Fit .
JON ® 8 ED
20
Cif gVILDING DEPT.v~Y
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake
October In, 1996 — —
NCA File No. 149896
Page 5
reinforcement and the grade beam system. Additional geotechnical support would be necessary for the
installation of the foundation. Typical pile loads for this type of condition are 10 tons, with a minimum
of 3 feet of penetration into the underlying glacial deposits,using 12-inch diameter piles.
Erosion Control Measures
Erosion control methods should be undertaken to prevent surface runoff from flowing into nearby Steel
Lake or adjacent properties. We recommend that surface runoff be diverted to controlled drainage and
siltation areas. We recommend that a silt fence be erected around the disturbed portion of the site. Hay
bales may be substituted for a silt fence, provided that they form a continuous line. Excavation spoils
should not be placed outside of the erosion control area. Erosion control measures should conform to
applicable local and county requirements.
Site Preparation and Grading
Excavation around the structure will unearth fill, peat and clay/silt soils, which are highly moisture
sensitive and nearly impossible to work with. We recommend that any excavated soils be immediately
removed, placed into trucks and removed from the site. The on-site soils, likely to be exposed during
construction, are considered highly moisture sensitive. We recommend that earthwork be conducted
during the drier summer months. Even during the summer months,construction activity may disturb the
existing surface. We recommend that a blanket of rock spalls be placed in the planned access roadway,
or where construction equipment will be working. The thickness of the spalls should be based on soil
conditions at the time that the site is developed, and their performance under heavy equipment. For
estimating purposes,we recommend using a minimum of 1 foot thickness of spalls in traffic areas.
Drainage
We recommend that runoff from impervious surfaces, such as roofs, driveway and access roadways, be
collected and routed to an appropriate storm water discharge system. The roof drains should be
tightlined separate of the footing drains, until the tightline is a minimum of 1 foot vertically down
gradient from the footing drains.
We recommend that the ground surface in crawl spaces be sloped to drain to an appropriate discharge
point. A drainage path from the crawl space and capillary break material, to the footing drain system
should be maintained. The ground surface adjacent to the building should be sloped to divert surface
water away from the structure.
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
a
•
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake
NCA File No. 149896
Page 6
We recommend that footing drains be installed along the outside of the planned exterior wall footings.
Footing drains should be installed at least 1 foot below planned finished slab or crawl space elevations.
Footing drains should be constructed of 4-inch perforated PVC pipe. We recommend that footing drains
be surrounded in free draining material such as pea gravel. The footing drains should be sloped to drain,
and routed to an appropriate discharge point.
Slabs
Any slab not structurally supported on piles or piers should be expected to settle. If these slabs are
approaches to the pile supported structures, a break and differential settlement should be expected at the
connection. A common practice is to design transition slabs for these•conditions. The transition slab is a
structural slab that is hinged into the structure. The hinges usually consist of rebar that extend from the
slab into the adjacent foundation. This allows the unsupported end of the slab to settle with the
surrounding ground surface, while the other end stays attached to the structure, but is allowed to rotate.
This eliminates the vertical offsetting at the connection,which is typically undesirable.
Slabs where moisture control is critical should be underlain by a 6-inch capillary break, consisting of a
free draining sand and gravel. A plastic vapor barrier should be placed over the capillary break material.
The capillary break should be designed so that it can drain into the foundation drain system.
Monitoring
We recommend that the geotechnical engineer be on site during installation of the driven pile or drilled
pier installations. Depths of penetration for each should be verified, with logs of each pile maintained.
A subsequent letter detailing the site observations, pile depths, recommended loads per pile, and any
other geotechnically related findings should be presented.
USE OF THIS REPORT
We have prepared this report for Ms. Suzanne Wong, and her agents, for use in planning and design of
this project, and as a geotechnical engineering follow-up to the original geotechnical evaluation report.
The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and estimating
purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of
subgrade conditions. If conditions observed during construction are different than that described in this
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake
October 10, 1996
NCA File No. 149896
Page 7
report, we should be retained to review these conditions and provide additional recommendations, as
necessary.
The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our
recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures,except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible
variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in
budget and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report.
We should be retained to provide monitoring and consultation services during construction, to confirm
that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide
recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those
anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with
contract plans and specifications.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our work, we have strived to take care that our
work has been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the
time this report was prepared. No other conditions,expressed or implied,should be understood.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report
or if we can provide additional services,please call.
¢fi S g P O ,t
Sincerely, y �
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC. �; o • •�/
•
LI f 1
f• fri,
ATC .. blti
o� 4P,, 20265 q � •
� 31�w
ASS%%NAL
EXPIRES fel. 1.•IA-1a
•
David L.Nelson,PG Charles P.Couvrette, PE
Professional Engineering Geologist Principal Engineer
Three Copies Submitted
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
NELSON-COUVRETTE & AS
CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS,GEOLOGISTS
AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
17311-135th Avenue NE,A•500 Snohomish County(206)337-1669
Woodinville,WA 98072
(206)486.1669•Fax 481-2510 Wenatchee/Chelan(509)784.2756
RECEIVED
October 10, 1996 JUN 0 8 2000
t.I I OF FEDERAL WAY
BUILDING DEPT.
Ms. Suzanne Wong
P.O.Box 28677
Seattle,Washington 98118
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence
30521 -28th Avenue South(Steel Lake)
Federal Way, Washington
NCA File No. 149896
Dear Ms.Wong:
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering review for your proposed residence
development within the above referenced project. The site is located at 30521 - 28th Avenue South, in
the Steel Lake area of Federal Way, Washington. For our use in preparing this report, we reviewed a
previous geotechnical evaluation report, prepared by us(as David L. Nelson & Associates, Inc.), and an
undated site plan titled"Approved Footprint"which was supplied to us by you.
The site is a residential lot situated on the west side of 28th Avenue South,and on the east side of Steel
Lake, measuring approximately 60 feet by 35 feet. An existing sanitary sewer line easement is located
between the proposed residence location and 28th Avenue South.'The residence structure is proposed to
be 10 feet from the surveyed shoreline. You are planning to construct your residence in the west portion,
between the sewer line easement and the 10 foot setback from Steel Lake. The foundation footprint of
the planned residence is approximately 25 feet by 29 feet, with the longer direction facing east to west
south. The adjacent lot to the north has an existing residence approximately 5 feet from the property
line. The adjacent lot to the south has an existing driveway and yard area, with the residence at least 25
feet east of the property line.
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake
• October 10, 1996 —
NCA File No. 149896
Page 2
SCOPE
The purpose of this review and report is to evaluate the existing conditions, review the previous report,
characterize the subsurface conditions, and present recommendations for site development. Specifically,
our scope of services includes the following:
1. Review available geologic and soils data for the site,based on published geologic maps.
2. Review the existing geotechnical evaluation report,dated August 6, 1986.
3. Observe the surface conditions at the site to determine if significant surficial changes
have occurred since the preparation of the previous report.
4. Review recommendations for site preparation and grading, recommendations for
subgrade improvement and foundation design.
5. Provide general comments on surface and subsurface ground water conditions, and site
drainage and erosion control recommendations.
6. Prepare a written report to document our review,findings and recommendations.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface
The original report discusses the site as moderately to gently sloping down to the west from 28th Avenue
South, and covered with grass and a few trees. Our recent site visit indicated similar conditions, with
now larger trees. No changes to the surface conditions are apparent. A wood fence in fair to poor
condition exists around the landward sides of the property.
Soils Conditions
The previous report describes the soils conditions within this site to consist of a basal strata of glacial
drift,shown on the test pits logs,to be encountered at depths below 6 to 9 feet. The glacial drift consists
of blue-gray,medium dense, fine, silty sand/sandy silt with some gravel. Overlying the glacial drift is 2
to 3 feet of light gray,very loose(soft),clayey, sandy silt/silty clay in a very wet state. A strata of dark
brown,very loose(soft),organic peat, in a very wet state overlies the soft clay/silt,and varies from about
1.5 to 2.0 feet thick. The surface soils were found to consist of about 2 to 4 feet of fill. The fill was
found to consist of brown, dark brown and gray, loose, mixed silt, sand, gravel, debris, rocks, rubble,
organics,etc.,of unknown origin. The fill was found to be apparently thicker toward the west.
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake
_ October 104 1996 _ —
NCA File No. 149896
Page 3
Our recent observations showed no indications of significant changes to the surface. This would lead us
to believe that,the previously encountered subsurface soils conditions could be expected to be similar as
those originally described.
Hydrologic Conditions
In the original report, ground water was found in all test pits, and appeared to be "perched" above the
basal glacial drift deposits. This condition is not expected to have changed from the original findings.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
The conclusions and recommendations presented in the original geotechnical evaluation were presented
in a fashion to allow the original owner to evaluate their potential for site development.(The conclusions
discussed the fact that the near-surface fill, organic deposits and soft clay/silts wer6ndesirable for
conventional shallow foundations) (The potential for distress to the structure, due to differential
settlements,was presented)
Alternative foundation preparation and support suggestions were made, including removal and
replacement with structural fill or pile/pier support. Because of the difficulty with overexcavation
adjacent to existing structures, pavements and utilities, and the nearby lake, the pile/pier alternative was
discussed and presented as the preferable alternative.
The site is underlain, at a shallow depth,by soft clay/silt,organic deposits of peat covered with fill. The
peat should be expected to settle with time both under its own weight, and also under any new loads.
The thickness of the fill and peat totaled about 6 feet over the building area,with the soft clay/silt being
found to about 9 feet below grade. In our opinion, this condition would cause undesirable differential
settlement if the structure was floated.• At depth,the site is underlain by medium dense glacial drift. We
concur with the recommendations that suggest that the foundations be extended down into the glacial
soils.
Deep foundations could consist of drilled piles or piers, or driven "pipe" piles. Also, whenever
foundations such as these are used, in areas where ground surface settlements are expected over time,
additional design is appropriate. We recommend that approach slabs be designed as structural slabs that
hinge to the structure. This allows settlement of the slab without dropping down from the structure.
NELSON-COUVRETTE& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake
October 10, 1996
NCA File No. 149896
Page 4
Decks may be either floated or founded similar to the structure: We would expect that the performance
of the deck foundations would not be acceptable, if it is floated next to a house that is founded on deep
foundations.
Foundations
General: Fill,peat and soft clay/silt soils were encountered within the proposed building portion of the
site,to total about 9 feet in thickness. Most of the structure is expected to have these undesirable soils to
this depth. Depth of the explorations was limited by the exploration equipment and site conditions to
only 11 feet below grade. Soils conditions below this depth are unknown. However, based on similar
sites and conditions, it is expected that dense glacial deposits should underlie the site for depths
sufficient to support the structure,'using the recommended means and techniques.
Piles and Drilled Piers: Piles can be driven or drilled,and/or cast-in-place. Driven piles would consist
of steel pipe. Timber piles would not be considered cost effective because of the relatively shallow depth
to bearing soils. The vibration of the pile driving equipment would also be a concern with respect to the
adjacent residences. Pipe piles can be used if they are shown to be economical. Typically, 2-inch pipes
are driven using a 90-pound jack hammer,to a refusal criteria of less than 1 inch of advancement for one
minute of driving. A 4,000 pound capacity is used for these piles. If desired, larger piles, hammers and
capacities are available and still considered small scale. Most likely the steel piles could be economical
for the structure, since there is a difficulty with access, the small installation area, and the close
proximity of the sewer line. We suggest that you contact a contractor experienced in this method.
Cast-in-place piles can consist of auger-cast piles or open holed drilled piers. The auger-cast piles are
drilled with a hollow stem continuous flight auger, and grout is pumped into the hole as the auger is
withdrawn. This method is the most reliable cast-in-place pile, as the auger keeps the hole from caving
as the grout is placed. •The open hole pier is the least expensive method. The risk involved with this
method is whether or not the hole will stay open. The piles will have to penetrate the underlying glacial
deposits. If significant ground water is present,the holes could cave in both the peat and the underlying
sand. The risk in this method would be that only a portion of the piles could be drilled open hole, and
then some other type of system would have to be used to finish the rest.
Whenever piles or piers are used, a grade beam needs to be designed to span between the piles and
support the structure. A structural engineer would be required to provide the design of pile
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake
October 10, 1996 —
' NCA File No. 149896
Page 5
reinforcement and the grade beam system. Additional geotechnical support would be necessary for the
installation of the foundation. Typical pile loads for this type of condition are 10 tons,with a minimum
of 3 feet of penetration into the underlying glacial deposits,using 12-inch diameter piles.
Erosion Control Measures
Erosion control methods should be undertaken to prevent surface runoff from flowing into nearby Steel
Lake or adjacent properties. We recommend that surface runoff be diverted to controlled drainage and
siltation areas. We recommend that a silt fence be erected around the disturbed portion of the site. Hay
bales may be substituted for a silt fence, provided that they form a continuous line. Excavation spoils
should not be placed outside of the erosion control area. Erosion control measures should conform to
applicable local and county requirements.
Site Preparation and Grading
Excavation around the structure will unearth fill, peat and clay/silt soils, which are highly moisture
sensitive and nearly impossible to work with. We recommend that any excavated soils be immediately
removed, placed into trucks and removed from the site. The on-site soils, likely to be exposed during
construction, are considered highly moisture sensitive. We recommend that earthwork be conducted
during the drier summer months. Even during the summer months,construction activity may disturb the
existing surface. We recommend that a blanket of rock spalls be placed in the planned access roadway,
or where construction equipment will be working. The thickness of the spalls should be based on soil
conditions at the time that the site is developed, and their performance under heavy equipment. For
estimating purposes,we recommend using a minimum of I foot thickness of spalls in traffic areas.
Drainage
We recommend that runoff from impervious surfaces, such as roofs, driveway and access roadways, be
collected and routed to an appropriate storm water discharge system. The roof drains should be
tightlined separate of the footing drains, until the tightline is a minimum of 1 foot vertically down
gradient from the footing drains.
We recommend that the ground surface in crawl spaces be sloped to drain to an appropriate discharge
point. A drainage path from the crawl space and capillary break material, to the footing drain system
should be maintained. The ground surface adjacent to the building should be sloped to divert surface
water away from the structure.
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
B.
•
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake
Oanber 1Q1996
NCA File No. 149896
Page 6
We recommend that footing drains be installed along the outside of the planned exterior wall footings.
Footing drains should be installed at least 1 foot below planned finished slab or crawl space elevations.
Footing drains should be constructed of 4-inch perforated PVC pipe. We recommend that footing drains
be surrounded in free draining material such as pea gravel. The footing drains should be sloped to drain,
and routed to an appropriate discharge point.
Slabs
Any slab not structurally supported on piles or piers should be expected to settle. If these slabs are
approaches to the pile supported structures, a break and differential settlement should be expected at the
connection. A common practice is to design transition slabs for these•conditions. The transition slab is a
structural slab that is hinged into the structure. The hinges usually consist of rebar that extend from the
slab into the adjacent foundation. This allows the unsupported end of the slab to settle with the
surrounding ground surface, while the other end stays attached to the structure, but is allowed to rotate.
This eliminates the vertical offsetting at the connection,which is typically undesirable.
Slabs where moisture control is critical should be underlain by a 6-inch capillary break, consisting of a
free draining sand and gravel. A plastic vapor barrier should be placed over the capillary break material.
The capillary break should be designed so that it can drain into the foundation drain system.
Monitoring
We recommend that the geotechnical engineer be on site during installation of the driven pile or drilled
pier installations. Depths of penetration for each should be verified, with logs of each pile maintained.
A subsequent letter detailing the site observations, pile depths, recommended loads per pile, and any
other geotechnically related findings should be presented.
USE OF THIS REPORT
We have prepared this report for Ms. Suzanne Wong, and her agents, for use in planning and design of
this project, and as a geotechnical engineering follow-up to the original geotechnical evaluation report.
The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and estimating
purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of
subgrade conditions. If conditions observed during construction are different than that described in this
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
Geotechnical Engineering Review Report
Proposed Wong Residence-Steel Lake _
_ October 10, 1996 ---
NCA File No. 149896
Page 7
report, we should be retained to review these conditions and provide additional recommendations, as
necessary.
The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our
recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or
procedures,except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible
variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in
budget and schedule,should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report.
We should be retained to provide monitoring and consultation services during construction, to confirm
that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide
recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those
anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with
contract plans and specifications.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our work,we have strived to take care that our
work has been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the
time this report was prepared. No other conditions,expressed or implied,should be understood.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report
or if we can provide additional services,please call.
�o w WAS
Sincerely, y ,,��►►
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC. ,6� •r`
�. 0411
sC •• bit,
O��s�G MST G1�4r� •
iONAL
(EXPIRES 4'• 4.I b j
•
David L.Nelson,PG Charles P.Couvrette, PE
Professional Engineering Geologist Principal Engineer
Three Copies Submitted
NELSON-COUVRETTE&ASSOCIATES, INC.
i
\ 1 Iii f `1p Ap Y Y I
1 ! :
. ur ifi wlit 44 V go, If vkkitztivt4
61 i `tv-t' t ilt \ ,‘ t ; rq i
toI > i 1- 4 latlitts4 O'NN 1 ortzth ,
V 1%%t Zs et•k•!III t III tri
:, ti) i k i k vlk lh i!‘44.,1$"1\, MI 411:1
ii
2 a, i i t 'kt �zta •; tI ,t�� zg . z 1 I
' S cl 1 . ,1 ef‘ 4 IN IA tql$V4Itiqt i eg tt a II I
t
W co` ��$h�i,� t� g% �� `cog tit; 1i, %41:04z3ti : I ill
114,
CC
14
. II r- 1 . I
I lit 111b
1 ki K:ci r ii 7*IN.:i,
;
---":"--1
l7 , i
i' . 3 } II: :.
, ,, .
— ,ii,
�1 .i
><
: , . --'' 1 3 ,. ..,
, t __.,-- ,„, ..i,
vri., !;
t a•% a i >{
1 ot I Iiii I
ill % 1V I
eta 4 "� Q
..
EofF L__ RECEIVED Shoreline Management Act of 1971
MAR 11 1996 Permit No. GMp95-0004
33530 First Way South
Federal Way WA 9E003 DEPT. Or t U LU(i
Phone(206)661-4000
PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL
DEVELOPMENT, CONDITIONAL USE, OR VARIANCE
O Substantial Development Permit 0 Conditional Use ® Variance
Administering Agency City of Federal Way Date
GB
Approved 0 Denied Date of Issuance 2/27/96 Date of Expiration 2/27/2001.
A permit is hereby granted/denied to(pursuant to RCW 9o.SS) Greg Otto and Dorris Messier
2117 NE 13th, Portland, OR, 97212
(Addreu)
to undertake the following development: Construct a 1,800 sq ft residence
on a 4,500 sq ft waterfront t.o7.
upon the following property(s•cti•a Township,unto: 9-21-4
Within(Name a(water area) Steel Lake and/or its associated
wetlands. The project willCwill not within shorelines of state wide significance (RCW
90.58.030). The project will be located within a(Environment) Urban
designation.
The following master program provisions are applicable to this development. State the master
program sections or page numbers. If a conditional use or variance, also identify the portion
of the master program which provides that portion of the master program being varied.
Kina County Code 25.16.100. Residential fevolnptnont: ForiPral Way
City Code 18.166, Shoreline Variance.
Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and
conditions:
See attached City of FEderal Way Hearing Examiner decision dated
February 27, 1996 (application was approved without conditions) .
f
i'-
This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this
permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal,state,or local statutes,
ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline
Management Act(Chapter 90.58 RCW).
This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.68.140(7)in the event the permittee fails
to comply with the terms of conditions hereof.
CO tt .n+Y MR WR.f�',NCP7ItQtcFORLtN iJt7(O?1ZED Ytttx'yy DAYe..
�* !eapR s 6)AN`D aavtt ,..•
AtPttGYtp .IC 6J( �'^:.
' - r
Approval?L'elo ' �A.. trFroacti cAass-'ew , Date �1A7/q,6
F ' Y Ftc41rv4 E) n0Ns•R-.
FOR CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT
G Approved 0 Denied Date Received
This variance permit is approved/denied by the department pursuant to Chapter
90.58 RCW.Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and
conditions:
G' Cf.
•
Uvula t2,*,,4
CA ti
� - oy
N 0.
ill
I11
H
b Ii
14
$ 1
.s..\ Cs ' • C
i
N.
i
14
I
.cam — u � ' D
el
sli
I 4 i g Vs 1ZNr is
N
lv to 0
9 W �� s Y . i
n 4
N N E -4 4
•
_ _Iii____(/)
•
Q '.
6`''Z I-- U >
��A
4 T .
It
'I, `
.. - t
a T
i a t i
a
c
Y
Ek l'AliAli
i
'S j
"4
, zZ z av Tt rl �y
I
VI i L poN !!
1 "4ems m
5. Iv
. ! fi t, I -
w t x .
�
I
�` J ON 4iiN L
N 7
•
•
.M.`
'6UL O. WASH INC I ON
DEI'.\RWENT OF ECOLOGY
.\,,ahne.l Regional Oil,`..1190• toOth itu S.E • Bellevue, Washington 4410O8-;4S2 • (2061 649-7000
March 22, 1996
I cenify that I mailed a copy of this document
to the persons and addresses listed thereon.
postage prepaid.in a receptacle for United
Bill Kingman States mail in Bellevue.Washington on
3-» - 19%
Federal Way Planning Dept
33530 1st Way S 2t'tCe.e..t
Federal Way Wa 98003.6210
Greg Otto
2117 Ne 13th
Portland Or 97212
Dear Mr. Kingman and Mr.Otto:
Re: Federal Way Permit#SMP95-0004
OTTO,GREG:MESSIER,DORIS-Applicants
Shoreline Variance Permit 1996-NW-10007
The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced Shoreline Variance permit to
construct an 1800 sq ft.single family residence on 4500 sq ft.waterfront lot on Steel Lake
within the setback.
We concur that the proposal,as approved by Federal Way,meets the intent of the master
program and the criteria set forth in WAC 173-14-150 for granting a Variance. The permit is
hereby approved.
This approval is given pursuant to requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971.
Other federal,state,or local approvals may be required.
Those developments and activities authorized by the subject permit may not begin until twenty-
one(21)days from the transmittal date of this approval letter,or until conclusion of any
review proceeding(appeal)initiated within the twenty-one day period. You will be notified in
writing if this permit is appealed.
If you have any questions on the above action,please contact Alice Kelly at(206)649-7129.
Sincerel
L— •
Raymond K.Heuwig,Section Supervisor
Shorelands and Water Resources Program
RICH:AK:ak
Enclosure
CITY OF
�vFn, CITY HALL
33530 1 st Way South (253) 661-4000
PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718
September 26,2000
Mr. Freeman Fong
Freeman Fong Architects
1514- 1161 Avenue W
Seattle, WA 98119-3205
RE: Permit#00-103242-000-00-SF; WONG
30521-28th Avenue S; Drainage Review
Dear Mr. Fong:
The following is a review of the calculations and site plan provided by Russell Larmay, P.E., for the above-
referenced building permit application. Since no address was provided for Mr. Larmay,I trust that you will
relay these comments to him.
1. The bio-swale may be adjusted to 30 feet long as proposed. Please show the top and bottom edges
graphically on the plan view,and show dimensions.
2. Provide a profile view of the bio-swale showing the side slopes,depth,property line and structure.
3. Note the seed mixture to be used for the bio-swale.
4. Sign and stamp the plans and calculations.
5. Indicate the scale to which the plans and profile are drawn.
6. Please explain the purpose of the outlet protection on the south side of the house.
Please submit two sets of revised plans for final review. If you have any questions,please contact me at(253)
661-4125.
Sincerely,
ANN DOWER
Engineering Plans Reviewer
AD:jlf
cc Trent Ward,Development Services Manager
'oject File(AD)
Day File
I:\csdc\docs\save\64060353.doc
II .1 ges(erixe-C—;7e
RECEIVED
FREEMAN FONG ARCHITECTURE AUG �{ ry
1514 ELEVENTH AVENUE WEST UG 2 3 2000
SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98119-3205
206.282.8245
FAX 206.283.0895 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS
E-MAIL F-MAN@USWEST.NET ADMINISTRATION DIVISION
CC -�!�'� �
August 16,2000 -r/eYI kA)
Ken Miller,Deputy Public Works Director
City of Federal Way
33530— 1st Way South
Federal Way,WA 98003-6210 ? `
ATTN: Trent Ward,Development Services Manager � a
RE Permit#00-103242-000-00-SF-WONG
30521 —28th Ave S;Public Works Review
Dear Mr. Ward:
We are the architect and agent for Ms. Suzanne Wong,owner of the above project. On her behalf we
are seeking a waiver to the required frontage improvements per Federal Way City Code Article XVI,
IMPROVEMENTS,Section 22-1473— 1474,which ask Ms. Wong to"widen the street to 22 feet of
pavement (centerline to curb),add a curb,gutter,six-foot-wide planter strip with street trees,eight-
foot-wide sidewalk,and street lights."
As stated in Section 22-1477 of the FWCC,a waiver of these requirements may be granted if"1.The
improvement as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements,would not
function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or City as a whole." We
feel the required frontage improvements would neither improve nor be harmonious with the
neighborhood,and would,in fact,be hazardous to its safety and well-being.
As shown in the attached photographs of subject property,should the work be required on this
property it would be the only property in the neighborhood with a curb,gutter,six-foot wide planter
strip with street trees,eight-foot wide sidewalk,and street lights. We do not feel that a 35-foot-wide
strip of such improvements would enhance the neighborhood as a whole,and would in fact be visually
inharmonious.
As shown in the attached photographs of the subject property,the planting strip and curb would be
located another five feet away from the existing street paving,to within about five feet of the existing
fence. The new sidewalk would then extend another eight feet beyond the planting strip. This would
extend approximately four feet into Ms. Wong's private property. We feel the City cannot legally
extend this work into private property. If this requirement were enforced on Ms. Wong's property,any
future improvements done by her neighbors would enable the City to encroach at least four feet into
their properties,which would certainly cause hardship to some. For instance,the new sidewalk,
located as required,would end in the landscaping of the neighbors south of subject property,and in the
carport of the neighbors north of subject property. We are sure this is neither feasible nor practical.
If this requirement were enforced,the street would widen only in front of the subject property. This
would present a hazard to both pedestrians and cars. Since the roadway would not be widened beyond
the 35-foot width of this property,pedestrians on either side of the subject property would still be
walking on the median strip. At the subject property,pedestrians would have to move six to seven feet
toward the subject property to get to the sidewalk,then walk six to seven feet toward the cars again to
get back on the median strip once past the subject property. This would present a very dangerous
AeM ;Japed io Apo ayi Jo Aiuno3 6uIy:
Kq paidao3e aq Il!M ate3!! uJao Aiwgepenv - >; '1
sly) ieyi uolieiuesaidai ou se ew Q'fl'i � `d c 4+ ?o
1 V a)
t a +}Ia °' ta 'o
a) C a
_.1 ,k > al a al cn
QN N ,11d a 1417 �T 4 14
O 0 4 N y1 4 41 0 14 01 yl •d N 01
u o a 0 •O °.d 3 �.I 4) m -� •
o f 8 � >- w b gd uai� °uW a 0 0 14 br 4
o t 7. o > a - 41 E • 4' u a 4,1 a) •.>i •-a cr Q 0 41
..4 GI
E
Er N Q � __1 N ro d •.c N V .4 }I o 0 0 G to +� 6 cl
N . .1 y► a1 N v• •,� «-1..1 a .,1 C 4 •+1 i1 o • rl cd al
H Q u E v 3 q N 3 .�G a w 0 end fs7 d f� d O; O .� "' C� Q/
04 .g o 1 c ....1 N a1 .0 •o .0 0 N w •.g N O O m w u.,-1 CO $+ `\
0 � Og Q a. N al � >~ d ry w o � � N .Cxx
Q. Q 0 d b •� -� � o ° 4-) 4-)
A W 6 0 ,.. r . o ad
cd CS
gc ro 14 11 .510 N a1 W •[ a .4 a 3 0 >'O d N.\ �'
W C .0 $4 N ro
Q .1 O ai ° a >. d -Uc O al W Q cis �1 U3
rl
0 F-- E �►O J J C ae C 41 0 4 1 rt ,-1 „ .0 11 •O C .� .Ui "4 rl'd
4 al
V- G a -' p, u al G -� ii u Id }1 N o 41)
n ° . ' .1100
CD 14, _ E N +) 14
W ,
W e tNi
• � " Z ,' 1 la •AI ro3,4 owl � � a O� ac � � �w
a dddd /, it 100
V H fa C In 41 dOd1� 1, a oo ++ ;d
Fl—
o. a � '+ 3 -�1 3 C0O xa ; A
.a a. c 0 • m
000 al
A - a A •-I w o a w• C .4 0 0-1
a► d a °pI • C w O
_� `i,� J`O }— a �. aai u H • N .. ate+ > Ii g o -1 v 1 4, $ .p ,ip
, `.rj = d b J , u 'a �\ N g 0 C H > 0 b a 0 cd ••-1 4.)
J p > e a > I ., a) a) •.1 1, 41 > •,,1 a ro b �+ ..o o ''i v
d) ••1 -� 1 41 14+ •H-I G b N •R. m a A m•.1 ° o p 'Ic „ d cd .,�
(-0 A. ro 4 ac o a 3 t) 14 44 o >+ .4 A Q1 >1 4, o w � {� , ■
14 14
In I, o
Z O C y • H A •4 .0 V a d N •,j N d ow ° •1 -y ad
r1 i�.�G
m C Y .p -.4 N N 'O 0 44 $4 3 a § .2 g N a/ cd CI
,C b 3 _ Ni ., �►J +' ° >. 7. 0 a or i0 .0 r1
y C E M y Nc ti O # O `Ci
0 N N N N O O C O .c o• N v1 a 0 �i al E
N O.41
co
C >,• 7 •C V v v M 7`I ° ° \ N O U N •,-I >+.C, i� cd
>y 1y 14 v a) a) O•O >, •,4 N N O O •••1 >.in Z rl 4i CO '� .Ty
O` N >Nmh4 Gy 7 Gd aW) � J�1 000 3 3 a1a+�' X � am
mi . •°1iIOAyy�����W U S V 14 � � •� w�
. % 4= O U p C Z W x O 3 3 3 y m 'd U G •� ❑O MOO . F, O � C ,-O-I
p p c>s 0 4 L in 1i1 4 .G .0 $1 la [ A o ' [ b �y V +a N N
N m tEEz0 3 H G z ® 0 H H H tr� O �L 3 R H 3 ▪•� cd C pp
n 0 . 4
.fl -.� ro
c� o f t co G .a a a c>r G • $4 +-c 4 j m 1
• 0.-1 05u.
PI1"1 4U k
ieJeped ;o A4i0 aul JO IlunOO 6U! .
fq p�,daaoe eq liiM elea':fl1Ja0 1,1. . i. V .. Oo
�" s)ul leul uoue uasa�dai ou se eu� aril • w .,� ,�
CI
,r 0 0 0 a 4/1 .. 0 0 a -0 t) U �•
u a a► o ei a '0 a .> N n v
4.1
..-4 a O 41 -.4 S7
m a N .� m 0 Cl
•d O m N >, .0 > m A X N H
A 0 N U 0
3 o u a 4 A O 1+ 0 • ,�
�a
Noy : -4 k as 14 0 0 �° 1n • 0 � - 0
o 54 u a 0 o o >4 a � .-1 0i •
>,� k 0 Iz
.i u > � x N 4.1 04
A d ,�, a si m .-1 m N o
�.. o o` >- o .4 d • m O 0 i-I •.i h0 O 0
o `� .— u as 4 w a 0 0 .-1 14 +.1 0 U ..{ d 4.1 a
p 0 g 3 i cl t'. w 1>i o a '° a m a >. b a y a a
01: 1 _, a a ot `� a d 14 o --I \f-.4
J C7 O ,o n n' In 3 N d 00 -.i m 14 'd to cd to
$4 4-1 , Iti
j b 14 'm0 >4 m 0 4 U 0 11 0 4 U o c3
tr o a1 '.� a a{
v E +j
co
N •1 O O m Ct Lt 0 H O
0 .oC
Ce
O, O 0.4
: U to 0 O O .-1 G «t O A w
Li c b lc c f >+ 0 d a f+ 0 ,.) tr > .,
J1J Ama a
LL '0 O , 0 a '0 an Cl 4 3 0 -.1 u A > 14 3 C • 1 a
4 al i m +t m .0 N C N m .4 d 01 .-1 -.1 !R. �
j�; O� b o -N4 lmi 0 O 4 3 C 'O > O • $ tCP 0'.
/pMJ 00 a Oa y a o .A1 0 N 0 0 •0 11 0
.. r) 1 v' U ld m 0 -•1 O d H .-I N '
n { --1 m A m 44 0 0 5 11 a1 x a. 0 Cl M si 1
�r� a, 4, i� 04 w a C1 O
y Ct 7 �7 ae A d $4 0 t0 d 0 -0 m o ay d 4f A .� O w I
t w° 4 Cl( a Z 1 +' .-1 w a �o a -0 i1 'o ra .a .c .fl �d _.
ail 0 a G v y 3 c°� 0 14 '' �d y ,. a 1pi i c° o a y 9 arc .0 c1
w., t� 4.m` L .y by u 11 N. 0 ...1
1 a 0 O► O 11 0 0 4./ •'' > N
(L p V �. •'� ;; 0 u m 0 N. .e a +� 40 m m S m 0 0 0 a� 0 N+� +► 0 4-1
N •
a, •.y O tr -1 0` 3 +1 '0 �► d 0 a .d of d d 0 U u m ..rl .O .� m
Eve b CO a 'd .. 4 4 > o m > 11 0 0 0 0 0 CI d 8 1+ c0. al G Q
Q1 = k to 0 V) Z4 m -el
a V .-. d .. .-. 11 •
C V a7 a A -.1 —1 ,, a m m s:r1 34 4
d ` Cc � i1.1 0 y a m N v ; A •o 0 /4 N 1>i 0 0 0 0 0i3 r 01 0 4
d 3 Q1 c� .V L O .4 A mar a a d aJ 1C N U W O'�.� :.,L' S.
0
ci `° amo z L. -* w d d m O O O m Cl0 an d
N rov •
wu1 �.{
o -4o N �+
S = p _ � a, d a o
•C t V �`y Y .q� y m 4 d H 0 F a H 0 0 •�C d A u 14 O
cp.� mmyC .Gy > >+ v1 �O d v1 m U d .i p 4 E.
do
Q Y C�UI U � V z U �„� V W 5)
O O co c c y w 1.] b
• 4 O • . m HC. a A OA d OA .0 OA v1 .di cN
1 -lilH O O 14 3 . `a
.^ fl.4 h ap a Q g W h• •
r.I •.r * ►� v U.
fi00W c� � a � VI .•I