Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
15-101638-SE
CITY OF Federal Way Addendum No. 4 to the 2006 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Name of Proposal: City Center Planned Action EIS: Timeline Addendum City File: 14-103973-00-SE Final EIS: Effective September 8, 2006 Addendum 1: Issued February 8, 2008 Addendum 2: Issued April 2, 2010 Addendum 3: Issued November 3, 2010 Description of Proposal: Amendment to the above -referenced EIS to extend the end timeframe of the designation from 2014 to September 30, 2015. Applicant: City of Federal Way Location: City Center Planned Action Area Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, 253-835-2634 Description of Addendum No. 4 This addendum extends the end timeframe of development for which the Planned Action Ordinance applies, from 2014 to September 30, 2015. On page 2-1 of the EIS it states, "...the planned action designation is anticipated to apply to development that occurs through 2014. The City will periodically assess the rate of actual development that results from the planned action designation and associated environmental conditions. Based on this assessment, the City may determine to extend, maintain, or subtract from the effective lifespan of the planned action designation." A short-term extension of the designated development end timeframe for a period of nine (9) months is proposed. During that time, in 2015, the City plans on conducting a detailed transportation analysis as part of a plan to extend the EIS for a longer period of time. In the time period following the effective date of the City Center Planned Action EIS (2006), there has been minimal development activity within the designated planned action area. Therefore, the land use development thresholds identified in the Planned Action EIS and related vehicle trip thresholds are still valid, and there is sufficient capacity remaining to accommodate development anticipated for the area for the nine -month time extension. No new or substantially different significant adverse impacts are anticipated to any of the elements of the environment discussed in the EIS. While not deemed new or substantially different significant adverse impacts, the following is a description of some changes in impacts disclosed in the EIS: Addendum No. 4 to Planned Action EIS File#14-103973-00-SE/Doc. I.D. 66405 Air Quality — No change. Land Use — No change, Aesthetics, Light, and Glare — No change. Transportation — The Planned Action will be able to accommodate future growth through September 2015. The Planned Action, as adopted, has approximately 5,087 PM peak hour trips in reserve capacity through at least 2014. A significant portion of the capacity is still available to accommodate future development as the overall development within the Planned Action area has not occurred as anticipated. City Traffic Engineer Rick Perez has- confirmed the nine -month extension is acceptable in terms of transportation impacts and mitigation. Public Services — No change. Utilities — No change. NOTE.• There is no comment period for this addendum per WAC 197-11-625. Responsible Ofciak Isaac Conlen, Planning Manager, for Larry Frazier, Interim Director of Community Development 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2643 Signature Date Issued: November 17, 2014 Addendum No. 4 to Planned Action EIS File N14-103973-00-SE/ Doc. T.D. 66405 4% CITY OF 4� Federal way FIB DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 a Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 www.cityoffederalway.com Addendum No. 3 to the 2006 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Name of Proposal: City Center Planned Action EIS: Building Height and TIF Addendum City File: 10-102692-00-SE Final EIS: Became effective September 8, 2006 Addendum 1: Issued on February 8, 2008 Addendum 2: Issued on April 2, 2010 Description of Amendments to the above -referenced EIS to modify Alternative 1 to allow for Proposal: multi -unit buildings in excess of 200 feet when increased height does not result in increased floor area ratio and overall intensity of development; and Amendments to traffic mitigation in the above -referenced EIS replacing the pro-rata share traffic mitigation identified in the EIS with Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) system since adopted in FWRC 19.91, and validating the applicability of the plan as required by the Planned Action Ordinance. Applicant: City of Federal Way Location: City Center Planned Action Area Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Senior Planner Janet Shull, 253-835-2644 Description of Addendum No. 3 This addendum clarifies the potential for development under the City Center Planned Action EIS to exceed the 200-foot height limit presented in Alternative 1. The City has found that additional building height may be considered when the overall intensity of the proposed development is less than or equal to that of a building that could be built under the existing development and design guidelines. An example i that a taller building may be permitted when the overall square footage or unit count is less than or equal to that of a building that could be built per the 200-foot height limit standard. Essentially, this results in taller but skinnier building towers. This addendum also amends the traffic mitigation identified in the EIS and replaces it with the Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) system that was adopted subsequent to the adoption of the City Center Planned Action EIS. There is no significant difference between the mitigation originally identified in the EIS and that assessed via the TIF. In the time period following the effective date of the City Center Planned Action EIS (February 8, 2006), there has been minimal development activity within the designated planned action area. Therefore, the land use development thresholds identified in the Planned Action EIS and related vehicle trip thresholds are still valid, and there is sufficient capacity remaining to accommodate development anticipated for the area. No new or substantially different significant adverse impacts are anticipated to any of the elements of the environment discussed in the EIS. While not deemed new or substantially different significant adverse impacts, the following is a description of some changes in impacts disclosed in the EIS: Air Quality — No change. Land Use — No change in overall development intensity because taller buildings are only covered by the EIS when the overall floor area ratio and building program does not exceed what could be allowed for a project adhering to the 200-foot height limit. Regarding land use compatibility, no new or substantially different mix of land uses is anticipated. Aesthetics, Light, and Glare — Taller, skinnier buildings would result in taller built forms on the city skyline, resulting in a greater sense of transition from existing low -scale built forms. Future development of mid- and high-rise scale will serve to mitigate the initial transition. The thinner profile of buildings taking advantage of this height modification would result in less bulky built forms that could block views less and cast less broad shadows. Cumulative view blockage and shadow casting from multiple towers on one site or in proximity would be less, although shadows would reach longer distances. The administrative design review function inherent in administering this height modification allows for design interventions that could help minimize the visual impact of upper -level bulk (such as upper -level setbacks, tapering, change to lighter materials or increased glazing, etc.). The only changes to light and glare impacts would be that sources of light and/or glare could reach higher into the sky. Transportation — The Planned Action will be able to accommodate future growth through 2014. The Planned Action, as adopted, has approximately 5,087 PM peak hour trips in reserve capacity through at least 2014. A significant portion of the capacity is still available to accommodate future development as the overall development within the Planned Action area has not occurred as anticipated. Furthermore, a traffic analysis comparing traffic volume from 2006 to 2010 at key intersections within the Planned Action area indicate a decrease in overall traffic volume of 8 percent from the year 2006. The traffic impact fee (TIF) program, adopted by Council under Ordinance 09-627 and codified into code under FWRC 19.91, would replace the established pro-rata mitigation fee of $2,827 per PM vehicle trip identified in Exhibit B to Ordinance 07-547, the Planned Action adoption ordinance. This would create a more systematic way for applying the fees, and provide predictability for the developers. All projects used to establish the pro-rata share mitigation fee in the Planned Action are either completed or included in the project list used to derive the impact fee rate. This policy complies with the state's Growth Management Act (GMA) intent that new growth would pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve the new growth and also mitigate the adverse impact of future development within the Planned Action area. Public Services — No change in system -wide impacts. Taller buildings may require more supplementary pumping and/or storage systems for water flow than shorter buildings to aid in supplying water to fire suppression systems. Fire District review of building plans ensures adequate fire suppression plans whether the buildings are taller or not. Utilities — No change. NOTE. There is no comment period for this addendum. Responsible Official. Greg Fewins, Director of Community Development Services 33325 8t' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Signature: Z6::� 1� - Date Issued.• November 3.2010 10402692 Dm LD. 5623E DEPARTMENT OF CONVIVNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 80' Avenue South UTY OF PO Box 9713 -9719 F a a Federal Way WA 9alway.co www. cit yo ffede ral way. com Addendum No. 2 to the 2006 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Name of Proposal: City Center Planned Action EIS: Map Boundary Addendum Description of Proposal: Amendments to the above -referenced EIS to modify the boundary of the Planned Action area to add the area represented by Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) 1068. The Final EIS became effective September 8, 2006. Addendum No. 1 was issued on February 8, 2008. Description of Addendum No. 2 This addendum modifies the boundary of the area within the City Center Planned Action EIS. The boundary modification is necessary to accommodate anticipated mixed use development, within the planned action area. The area being added to the planned action area is within the City Center -Core zoning district and shares characteristics with the properties originally designated as the planned action area. Subsequent to the adoption of the City Center Planned Action EIS, improvements within the area being added by this addendum were demolished, opening up potential for redevelopment consistent with that envisioned by the planned action_ The area being added to the planned action area is coincident with transportation analysis zone (TAZ) number 1068. Its boundaries are: South 3IP Street to the north; South 320`h Street to the south; 23`d Avenue South to the west; and the eastern boundary is roughly in alignment with 251h Avenue South; The above noted change does not alter assumptions contained within the EIS with regard to traffic impacts or other environmental impacts. Minor changes in disclosed impacts may result; however, no new or substantially different significant adverse impacts are anticipated to any of the elements of the environment discussed in the EIS. If you have any questions regarding this Addendum, please contact Senior Planner Janet Shull at 253- 835-2644, or janet.shull@cityoffederalway.com This Addendum. No. 2 is issued on the 2"d of April 2010. Greg Fewins, Federal Way SEPA Official Attachment: Modified Planned Action Boundary Map File#10-100852-00-SE Doc I D 53252 CITY OF Federal Way Addendum to the 2006 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 www.cit)Loffed lwaX.com Name of Proposal: City Center Planned Action EIS: Use -Mix Addendum Description of Proposal: Amendments to the above referenced EIS to redistribute the anticipated mix of land uses within the planned action area. The Final EIS became effective September 8, 2006. Description of Addendum The addendum re -allocates the mix of land uses identified within the EIS. The re -allocation is necessary to accommodate pending and anticipated projects, including the Symphony mixed -use project, within the planned action area. Demand for residential units is higher than originally anticipated. Residential units are increased and retail square footage is decreased proportionally. See italicized rows in table below: Land Use Current Quantity Addendum Adjusted Quantity Residential Units 750 2,400 Office Square Foota a 350,000 350 000 Retail S uare Footage 750,000 477,200 Civic Square Footage 100,000 100,000 Lodging (Rooms) 600 600 Structured Parking Spaces 750 750 The above noted changes do not alter assumptions contained within the EIS with regard to traffic impacts or other environmental impacts. Minor changes in disclosed impacts may result, however, no new or substantially different significant, adverse impacts are anticipated to any of the elements of the environment discussed in the EIS. If you have any questions regarding this Addendum, please contact Isaac Conlen, Senior Planner, at 253- 83 5-2643. This Addendum is issued on the 8th of February, 2008. dreg Fewins, Federal Way SEPA Official Attachment: Vehicular Trip Conversion Ratios Stacey Welsh From: COM GMU Review Team <reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 2:13 PM To: Stacey Welsh Subject: Acknowledgement Letter City of Federal Way Material ID_22024 Attachments: AckLetter 1-16.pdf Attached is the acknowledgement letter regarding: Adopted Ordinance 16-81 1, relating to the City Center Planned Action established pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.440 and amending FWRC 14.1 5.130. For more convenient and faster service please contact the Review Team at reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov or call 360.725.4047 if you have any questions. Please retain this letter for your records. STATE OF WAS14INGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1011 PUin 5ueer S * PO Box 42525 a Olyrnpsa, Washjr1 ra; t 96504-2525 « f,160) 7254000 www.commerce.wa.gov mef ce.wa7.gov January 21, 2016 Stacey Welsh Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003 Dear Ms. Welsh: Thank you for sending the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce) the following materials as required under RCW 36.70A.106. Please keep this letter as documentation that you have met this procedural requirement. City of Federal Way - Adopted Ordinance 16-811, relating to the City Center Planned Action established pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and amending FWRC 14.15.130. These materials were received on January 21, 2016 and processed with the Material ID # 22024. We have forwarded a copy of this notice to other state agencies. If this submitted material is an adopted amendment, then please keep this letter as documentation that you have met the procedural requirement under RCW 36.70A.106. If you have submitted this material as a draft amendment, then final adoption may occur no earlier than March 19, 2016. Please remember to submit the final adopted amendment to Commerce within ten (10) days of adoption. If you have any questions, please contact Growth Management Services at reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov, or call Dave Andersen (509) 434-4491. Sincerely, Review Team Growth Management Services IC(OPl S" r Jim Ferrell, Mayor December 30, 2015 Re: 2016 City Center Planned Action Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) The City of Federal Way has prepared the 2016 City Center Planned Action Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). Pursuant to State SEPA laws and rules, the City issued a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) on October 16, 2015. A 30-day comment period followed issuance of the DSEIS. A public meeting on the DSEIS was held on November 9, 2015. The Final SEIS includes all comments received during the comment period, responses to comments, and corrections and revisions to the DSEIS. The planned action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312th Street, on the south by South 3241h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23rd Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23rd Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317th Street and on the south by South 319th Place. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The documents are posted on the City's website at hap ://■v■■nv.ci.fedet �l-w:t .■ya:tt�linc_i_ex.a- Is?�IIl7=5f1:'i. CD copies may be purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way. Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stace y.we islt a eiiyoffc-de,ti■vay.co nl. Sincerely, Michael A. Morales Community Development Director c: Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 • www.cityoffederalway.com 41k Federal OF Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I,lax-rOL� hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washingl6n, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ® Other � J r 1 Gi,1 ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or 0posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2016. Project Name File Number(s) V11ri-e- � ( oe') Signature Date j U K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 12/18/2015 1:48:00 PM Posted Sites: Federal Way City Hall: 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way Library: 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 320th Library: 848 S. 320th St K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distdbution.doc/Last printed 12/18/2015 1:48:00 PM CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, .�,g�.P hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: / ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation I 0 Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document rS e`( S was mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 0 , 2015. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date i KACD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/18/2015 9:45:00 AM 2 u� Jim Ferrell, Mayor December 30, 2015 Re: 2016 City Center Planned Action Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) The City of Federal Way has prepared the 2016 City Center Planned Action Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). Pursuant to State SEPA laws and rules, the City issued a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) on October 16, 2015. A 30-day comment period followed issuance of the DSEIS. A public meeting on the DSEIS was held on November 9, 2015. The Final SEIS includes all comments received during the comment period, responses to comments, and corrections and revisions to the DSEIS. The planned action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312th Street, on the south by South 324th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23Td Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23rd Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317th Street and on the south by South 319th Place. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Wlay Comprehen ive Plan. The documents are posted on the City's website at ht www. i.federal-way-wa.0 index.as 3x?NID=503. CD copies maybe purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way. Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or s tacey.wels h@-cityo ffedetalway. cam. Sincerely, Michael A. Morales Community Development Director c: Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 • www.cityoffederaIway.com 015 City of 600' Parcel ityo Fed City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S. Federal Way Wa.98003 Federal Way Notification area (206) - 835 - 7000 www cltyoffederalway.com 305 51 N N a > Q S 308 ST N Lasl ei- Lake S 313 ST a y A Qv S 315 ST ST S 316 ST o� ¢ S317ST 0 S d co �T d S 322 14 PL c rs 9470, 5� S 305 PL ci rn d S 308 ST N N N as a > co 308 CT o N S 310 ST S312ST N N U) S316ST S316ST N a 2 N (� 5 316 PL Q LL CD N c.i S 318 PL N a a N S 320 ST U 00 j Q ,)t GL CM co Lake S 4 309 ST N N S Q 310 ST y v > � QS w N 311 ST N S C— L S312ST N Q N 314 Q ST 00 04 + S315LN Z f J ' S316LN n1bi � r ps S317ST N ;; r S Ja 319 PL � S 320 ST I 1 � tJ W � C D S 322 ST — ! S 324 ST S 324 ST 5 324 PL WINGED FOOT WY ` SEMMOLE LN S 325 Q 3 J ST `- z S S27 H o MER10A, Wy m a a r' tN CHr todye z ? HILLSRpt S 327 ST a 2 � OLYMPIC 37.8 tp WY OAK- CDS w MONT f rfl� A COLONIAL WY CT 1 S 328 PL p cP z !n S 330 s ST S 330 ST N Q N N t/w S rn N z d > 332 a � aCD � Y' ST S 331 ST co S 331 LN v Legend King County Tax Parcels Subject Property (,I(". Notified Properties s� 53 'a r"E+S314PL S316ST rn ly M S S 323 ST S �5 \ Federal Way Scale: N 0 385 770 Feet t t This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy 1621049044 KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON 32400 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800110 KIROS TASEW 2532 317T" ST # 106 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800750 JIMMY CALLO 2502 S 317T" ST # 203 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800640 MICHAEL & PAM DOUGHERTY 7301 NE 56T" CT VANCOUVER WA 98661 1541800120 MARILYN JOHNSON 2532 S 317T" ST # 107 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600040 MARYFRANCES HOOPER PAINTER 31013 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800190 BRIAN & ASHLEY HARRISON 11203 6T" AVE E 1 Lwo] ►L Is\Ti%lLel:L El t-T:ii%i1; 7853600037 BRIAN NORTON 1847 S 310T" ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800620 BRANDON CONNER 3933 LAKE WASH BLVD NE # 100 KIRKLAND WA 98033 1541801100 MIRA KIM 2508 S 317T" ST # 308 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Easy Peel® Labels ♦ Bend along line to n gVERYO 5160® Use Avery® Template 5160(5 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM V 1 2501400010 1541800100 1541800260 KIM & LEE PROPERTIES LLC HALL NIKKO A RICHARDSON ELICIAA Attn: KIM EUNKOO 2530 S 317TH ST UNIT 304 2534 S 317TH ST#204 1526 49TH ST NE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TACOMA WA 98422 2501400020 1541800150 1541800490 SANCHEZ RAMON MD RAUGH SIHO (TRUSTEE) BEALS JUSTIN+TJHIN WINA 1832 S 324TH PL UNIT #2 2532 S 317TH ST #207 2520 S 317TH ST #303 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800410 1541800810 1541800540 BIGLEY JOANN EDMISTON KIRK H KIM KYEJUNG 2520 S 317TH ST #102 2504 S 317TH ST #202 1408 BRITTANY LN NE #B203 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 LACEY WA 98516 1541800650 1541801060 1541800840 FUSION BAKER JEFFERY L EDMISTON KIRK+PAMELA PO BOX 23934 2508 S 317TH ST #208 2504 S 317TH ST #202 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800730 1541800160 1541800910 KROLTINA JEON SEONG MIN ROSENCRANTZADAM J 2502 S 317TH ST #201 2532 S 317TH ST #208 34617 4TH PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800280 1541800180 TIMMONS CHERYL L ZAMBONINO CESAR E+MERCY 2534 S 317TH ST #302 2532 S 317TH ST UNIT 306 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800290 1541800680 1541800480 CHELSEA COURT CONDOMINIUM A TADEMA HAROLD J CARLSEN JOSEPH T PO BOX 4508 2952 S 296TH ST 2520 S 317TH ST #302 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800350 1541800700 1541800650 ROBINSON NATHAN A+CHRISTINE U S BANK TRUST N A GARDINER LISA+JAMES D 2524 S 317TH ST #203 13801 WIRELESS WAY 2504 S 317TH ST UNIT 203 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73134 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800830 1541801010 MILFORD ANNETTE MANUEL RUEL CUAN CHING+RENA 2504 S 317TH ST #201 2508 S 317TH ST UNIT 106 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800520 1541800870 1541800300 NIX REBECCA D CARLSON KATHLEEN+GORDON THOMPSON THOMAS C 2522 S 317TH ST #107 2504 S 317TH ST #301 2534 S 317TH ST UNIT 304 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles ) peter ; A Repliez a la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com Utilisez le abarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de reveler le reE�ord P❑ u TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 j chargement p" p j 1 Easy Peel Labels A See Instruction Sheet SA%Mf4ff(D51600 i Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 51600 eed Paper for Easy Peel Featui 1 1541800430 1541800690 1541800890 KOHOUTEK KEVIN A+WHITE JEFF BANK OF AMERICA NA DAY MICHELLE B 2520 S 317TH PL #201 1610 E STANDREWS PL#13150 2504 S 317TH ST UNIT 303 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 SANTAANA CA 92705 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800630 LIUKKONEN JOANNA PO BOX 25134 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 1541800920 BARTON AUBRIE JOY+DERECK BR 2506 S 317TH ST #103 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541801030 NORLAND COLLEEN 2508 S 317TH ST #205 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800010 GRAY KIMBERLY PO BOX 2285 AUBURN WA 98071 1541800170 GOODMAN JENNIFER 2532 S 317TH ST #305 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800250 CHING MICHAEL HOO SUN 2534 S 317TH ST #203 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800400 LIPSETT KRISTA J 2524 317TH ST #304 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800440 HAILE TEKIE 2520 S 317TH ST #202 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800570 WHALEN KATHALEEN M 2522 S 317TH ST #305 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800710 ANDERSON PAUL 2502 S 317TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800720 MEYER JAMES W+TERESA M 2502 S 317TH ST #103 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800860 AKEHURST DEAN S 2504 S 317TH ST #204 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800970 ROCKWELL JACOB 1 2506 S 317TH ST #301 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800130 JARDINE CAROL M 2532 S 317TH ST UNIT 205 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800020 SACLOLO OSMAN L+DENISE ROXA 2530 S 317TH ST UNIT 103 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800090 ZAMBONINO CESAR E 2530 S 317TH ST #303 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800210 CHELSEA COURT CONDOMINIUM A PO BOX 4508 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 1541800530 FRANTZ LESLIE L 2522 S 317TH ST APT 205 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800460 NAKANO HIDETO 2520 S 317TH ST UNIT 204 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800200 GALANG LUISITO 2532 S 317TH ST #308 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800220 PURCELL MICHAEL 21237 5TH AVE S DES MOINES WA 9.8198 1541800470 WILMINGTON TRUST NA 8950 CYPRESS WATER BLVD COPPELL TX 75019 Etiquettes faciles a peler A Consultez la feuille wwwaverycom Utili-P7 IP aaharit AVFRYO z;lsn@ Sens de charaement d'inctnirtinn 7.Rnn.l.n-a K'Rv Easy Peel Labels __� See Instruct)®n Sltee,a�1 �AVERYp5160� I Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160� m `,eed Paper for Easy Peel Featu, 1 1541800990 1541800040 1541800980 COCHRANE BLONDELL FUSION BAUERANNAM PO BOX 98001 PO BOX 23934 2506 S 317TH ST UNIT 302 DES MOINES WA 98198 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800030 KONOMOS CHRISTOPHER D 2530 S 317TH ST #201 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800080 KLASSEN JAMES M 2530 S 317TH ST #302 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800310 THOMPSON JENNIFER 2524 S 317TH ST UNIT 102 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800770 MCELRATH MARILYN E 2502 S 317TH ST UNIT 301 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800270 HOGLUND STEVEN G 16628 SE 15TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98008 1541800740 LACY CHRISTINA 2502 S 317TH ST #202 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800950 STOCK JEFFREY W+LEANNE M 33926 9TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800070 WEILER RACHELLE E 16444 SYLVESTER RD SW BURIEN WA 98166 1541800880 VENTURES TRUST 2013-1-H-R 314 S FRANKLIN ST TITUSVILLE PA 16354 1541801020 LOSTON MICHAEL 2907 S 45TH ST TACOMA WA 98409 1541800330 FONTILEAJANELLE Attn: 2524 S 317TH ST #201 PO BOX 25585 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 1541800760 KRIEGER KATIE Y 2502 S 317TH ST #204 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541801050 VANGSTAD ERIC 2508 S 317TH ST #207 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800390 NOBLE LORENE 2524 S 317TH ST UNIT 303 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800500 CAMERON LORI ANN 2520 S 317TH ST #304 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Eticluettes faciles a peler A Utilisez le aabarit AVERY® 5160 Sens de charaement 1541801000 PETE JAMES 29815 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541801040 HATHIRAMANI KISHORE T 2508 S 317TH ST #206 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541801070 NORTON SHAYNE 2508 S 317TH ST UNIT 305 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800320 KOITZSCH KAY 107 SW 171 ST ST NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 1541800590 TAYLOR ANTHONY B 2522 S 317TH ST #307 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800600 BITTINGER MELONYA 26381 WHITMAN ST #65051 HAYWARD CA 94544 1541800960 WHITNEY CODY 2506 S 317TH ST UNIT 204 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800660 KOITZSCH VERNON E+CAROL M 10309 AGATE PL ANDERSON ISLAND. WA 98303 Consultez la feuille www.averycom ri'inctriirtinn i-Rnn-rn_AVFRV ffimmW Easy Peel Labels P See Instruction Sheep �q�1E1�Y� 5760® i Use Av ® TEMPLATE 51600 deed Paper for Easy Peel Featu, ��; 1 1541801080 1541800060 1541800670 JAMES CAROL L MITCHELL CINDY M LIU CHIH-YAO 28825 52ND PL S 2530 S 317TH ST #204 2512 S 317TH ST #301 AUBURN WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541801090 1541800240 ARNHOLD TERRY R MURPHY HAZEL M 2508 S 317TH ST #307 32290 1 STAVE S #354 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800790 ALARCON FRANK JR 2502 S 317TH ST #303 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800340 1541800800 DAUM SHAWN G MARCY JANET T 2524 S 317TH ST 202 2502 S 317TH ST #304 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800380 1541800820 FITTS JERRY M WAREHIME P STEPHEN 34848 54TH AVE S 2504 S 317TH ST #103 FEDERAL WAY WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800550 1541800930 CHAPPELLE EDWARD D COLBY THEODORE R D+HEIDI E 2522 S 317TH ST #207 2506 S 317TH ST #201 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800370 1541800140 RYU NANCY S GREAVES DAVID+GEORGINA L 32815 42ND AVE S 2001 MANORWOOD DRIVE SE FEDERAL WAY WA 98001 PUYALLUP WA 98374 1541800610 1541800510 PAK MICHAEL H SAITO MITSUTAKA+HOLLY 2512 S 317TH ST #102 6302 N HALE ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TACOMA WA 98407 1541800560 PERIA-HANSEN GREGGORY 2522 S 317TH ST UNIT 208 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800050 HARVEY JACQUALINE 2530 S 317TH ST #203 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles A Peler A Utilisez le aabarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de chargement 1541800940 STEPHENS TROY E+RICE MICHEL PO BOX 25632 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 Consultez la feuille vn wwaverycom d'instruction 1-900-GO-AVERT/ Easy Peel® Labels ♦ Bend along line to 11gVERY® 5160® ,Use AveryO Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM--1 0921049200 LIU TIEN TSAI+CHUEN H 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0921049045 YI CHONG N & YOUNG S 31246 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049046 DANA PLAZA LLC Attn: C/O YUN SAM 1124 S 287TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049051 BALLI ROAD LLC 31620 23RD AVE S #218 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049053 HILLSIDE PLAZAASSOC LLC PO BOX 5003 BELLEVUE WA 98009 0921049057 FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049207 COMMERCIAL NET LEASE REALTY Attn: ATTN: LEASE COMPLIANCE 450 S ORANGE AVE #900 ORLANDO FL 32801 0921049208 SEATAC VILLAGE SHOPPING CTR Attn- ATTN TAX DEPT PO BOX 2108 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049223 DANA PLAZA LLC Attn: C/O YUN SAM 1124 S 287TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049233 SEA -MAR COMM HEALTH CENTER 1040 S HENDERSON ST SEATTLE WA 98108 0921049235 WAL-MART PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 8050 #MS 0555 BENTONVILLE AR 72712 0921049241 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC Attn: PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE WA 98009 0921049109 NGUYEN THINH+GAM T PHAM 29520 2ND PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0921049110 SHIN MYUNG PLAZA LLC 25647 MARINE VIEW DR S DES MOINES WA 98198 0921049111 FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST 655 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1500 GLENDALE CA 91203 0921049112 SHIN MYUNG PLAZA LLC 25647 MARINE VIEW DR S DES MOINES WA 98198 0921049118 RHEKI FEDERAL WAY LLC Attn: C/O PACIFIC ASSET ADVISORS 600 108TH AVE NE #530 BELLEVUE WA 98004 0921049123 WILLAMETTE COURTAPARTMENTS 201 27TH AVE SE #A-200 PUYALLUP WA 98374 0921049125 WAL-MART PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 8050 MS 0555 BENTONVILLE AR 72712 0921049127 CP FEDERAL WAY LLC 1910 FAIRVIEW AVE E SUITE 500 SEATTLE WA 98102 0921049129 HANEY STEVEN S PO BOX 2009 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049137 ANSLLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049137 ANS LLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0821049077 HARSCH INVESTMNET PROPERTIE Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049078 ELLAYENN'S LLC 1111 W NICKERSON ST SEATTLE WA 98119 0821049089 ALBERTSONS LLC Attn: CO PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440 0821049090 GROVE STREET LLC 1400 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0821049108 PATTEN PROPERTIES 17923 RIVIERA PL SW NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 31620 23RD AVE STE 200 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049017 Etiquettes faciles a peter ; A Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Po -u T"' ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' j chargement P P j 1 Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ giffiffim Bend along line to I a L�����® 5160® Use Avery® Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM 1 0921049018 BRIGHTWATER APARTMENTS INC Attn: C/O LIM DANIEL C 31224 20TH AVE S #E-102 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049019 FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST 655 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1500 GLENDALE CA 91203 0921049020 HANNA JON D Attn: C/O MICHELLE B NELSON INC P 33650 6TH AVE S #230 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049021 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS CI 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049026 FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049027 ANSLLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 7978200525 CALVARY EVANGELICAL LUTHERA 2415 S 320TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7978200526 KING COUNTY -TRANSIT Attn: ADM-ES-0800 500 4TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98004 7978200535 BACM 2004-1 320TH STREET SO 1601 WASHINGTON AVE STE 700 MIAMI BEACH FL 33139 7978200540 PACIFIC HOSPITALITY LLC 32124 25TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1500500080 HARSCH INVEST PROPS LLC Attn: ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND WA 97208 1500500080 HARSCH INVEST PROPERTIE LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049030 1500500090 ST CLARA LLC KC INVESTMENTS LLC 4250 DAWSON ST #1904 PO BOX 3482 BURNABY BC CANADA V5C4B1 00000 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 KELLY WILLIAM R 8323 JUANITA DR KIRKLAND WA 98034 RAM INTERNATIONAL PO BOX 98768 LAKEWOOD WA 98496 S SALLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049034 1500500100 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIE Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049035 1500500110 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROPS LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049042 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 j 1500500130 HARSCH INVEST PROPERTIE LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 A ' Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de chargement reveler le rebord Pop-upTM j 1500500140 KILLY II LLC 1401 S 324TH ST #101 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1500500150 LARKSPUR CENTER LLC PO BOX 1762 SAN RAMON CA 94583 0380900010 TACOMA GOODWILL INDUSTRIES 714 S 27TH ST TACOMA WA 98409 0380900020 TACOMA GOODWILL INDUSTRIES 714 S 27TH ST TACOMA WA 98409 0821049013 PAVILION CENTER ASSOCIATES Attn: C/O KIMCO RLTY CORP POB 50 3333 NEW HYDE PK RD STE 100 NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 0821049052 WELLS FARGO BANK Attn: C/O THOMSON PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 2609 CARLSBAD CA 92018 0821049060 U S BANK CORPORATE PROPS Attn: 2800 E LAKE ST LAKE0012 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55406 0821049061 TJOSSEM RUSSELL+MCEWEN JULI PO BOX 614 BOTHELL WA 98041 0921049146 SONG & SONS INC 31622 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049159 LIU TIEN TSAI+CHUEN H 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel® Labels ; ♦ ® Bend along line to I UIN gVERY® 5160® .Use Avery® Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edger"' ' A 0921049162 0921049257 0921049291 SHIN MYUNG PLAZA LLC 25647 MARINE VIEW DR S DES MOINES WA 98198 0921049163 WAL-MART PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 8050 #MS 0555 BENTONTILLEAR 72712 KUBRA PROPERTIES LLC 2900 SE 3RD ST RENTON WA 98056 320TH STREET LLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 KIM WON T+YOUNG J 12011 21 ST AVE SW BURIEN WA 98146 0921049164 LIU TIEN TSAI+CHUEN H 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 DANA PLAZA LLC Attn: C/O YUN SAM 1124 S 287TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BUM CORP 31611 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049265 0921049292 BETHANY INVESTMENTS LLC 16532 NW VETTER DR PORTLAND OR 97229 0921049270 RETMAN SAM Attn: DARDEN RESTAURANTS PO BOX 695019 PROP TAX DEPT ORLANDO FL 32869 0921049172 0921049271 CRATSENBERG PROPERTIES Attn: C/O TOTAL PROPERTY MGMNT 2222 MERIDIAN AVE E #E EDGEWOOD WA 98371 0921049189 0921049272 MCDONALD'S REAL ESTATE TAX PO BOX 182571 COLUMBUS OH 43218 0921049190 MERIDIAN CRTAPTS LTD 201 27TH AVE SE BLDG A-200 PUYALLUP WA 98374 0921049248 P SQUARE PETROLEUM INC 8315 S 212TH ST KENT WA 98032 0921049252 YI CHONG & YOUNG 31246 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049255 THY CHOI FAMILY LLC 31656 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049256 LIU TIEN T 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 0921049293 THY CHOI FAMILY LLC 31656 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049296 CRATSENBERG PROPERTIES Attn: C/O STARBUCKS COFFEE CO3: PO BOX 34067/M S S-RE3 SEATTLE WA 98124 0921049297 CRATSEBBERG PROPERTIES LLC Attn: C/O TOTAL PROPERTY MGMNT 2222 MERIDIAN AVE E #E EDGEWOOD WA 98371 0921049276 0921049302 SHEON SHAM LLC BROADWAY-32ND STREET REALTY PO BOX 1941 43 W 32ND ST AUBURN WA 98071 NEW YORK NY 10001 0921049277 0921049303 SHIN MYUNG PLAZA LLC FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 25647 MARINE VIEW DR S 33325 8TH AVE S DES MOINES WA 98198 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049280 0921049304 FEDERAL WAY CITY OF WESTERN PALASIDE INC 33325 8TH AVE S Attn: ARHTUR & SHRILEY INC FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PO BOX 3858 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0921049284 0921049307 BEAL SERVICE GROUP WOODSIDE APARTMENT LLC 6000 LEGACY DR 2517 S 316TH LN PLANO TX 75024 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049286 0921049308 DANA PLAZA LLC PHAM GAM+THINH NGUYEN Attn: C/O YUN SAM 29520 2ND PL SW 1124 S 287TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 A Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Sens de reveler le rebord Pa u TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' j chargement p' p j 1 Easy Peel® Labels P ♦ Bend along line to _� n A�/EI��® 5160® Use Avery® Template 51600 Feed Paper - expose Pop-up EdgeTM V 1 0921049317 WOODSTONE CREDIT UNION PO BOX 27030 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 0921049320 IHP FEDERAL WAY (WA) OWNER 50 COCOANUT ROW STE 2 PALM BEACH FL 33480 0921049321 SAN SHAM LLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049325 KING COUNTY -PROPERTY SVCS 500 4TH AVE #800 SEATTLE WA 98104 0821049125 U S BANK CORPORATE PROPS Attn: 2800 E LAKE ST LAKE0012 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55406 0821049126 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIE Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049169 PATTEN PROPERTIES 17923 RIVIERA PL SW NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 0821049174 PAVILION CENTER ASSOCIATES Attn: C/O KIMCO RLTY CORP POB 50� 3333 NEW HYDE PK RD STE 100 NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 0821049181 KIMCO REALTY CORP 3333 NEW HYDE RD NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 0821049186 PAVILION CENTER ASSOCIATES Attn: C/O KIMCO RLTY CORP POB 50� 3333 NEW HYDE PK RD STE 100 NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 j 0821049194 BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC Attn: ATTN PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 3092 HOUSTON TX 77253 0821049196 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROP LLC Attn: ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049196 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROP LLC Attn: ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049206 JEYO LLC 5545 173RD AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 1721049083 TACOMA GOODWILL INDUSTRIES 714 S 27TH ST TACOMA WA 98409 1721049084 WOLFHOUND LLC 1416 WHITEHORN ST FERNDALE WA 98248 2501200020 FARLEY F MIKE+CHERI 1825 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2501200030 PROSPERITY VENTURES LLC 1826 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0821049216 2501200040 PAVILION CENTER ASSOCIATES FEDERAL WAY PLAZA INC Attn: C/O KIMCO RLTY CORP POB 504 5506 VARCO RD NE 3333 NEW HYDE PK RD STE 100 TACOMA WA 98422 NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 0821049228 VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT DBA Attn: QUINTANA INVESTMENTS INC 32939 49TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0821049229 NIEDER FAMILY LLC 1111 W NICKERSON ST SEATTLE WA 98119 0821049237 HARSCH INVESTMNT PROP LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049264 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROP LLC Attn: ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049328 IHP FEDERAL WAY (WA) OWNER 50 COCOANUT ROW STE 2 PALM BEACH FL 33480 A 11 Sens de Repliez 5 la hachure afin de chargement reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1 2501200050 1815 S 324TH PLACE LLC 2203 78TH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 2501200060 BORG WILLIAM D 1801 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2501200070 FARRIS NILES DAVID Attn: CASCADE VETERINARY HOSPI' 1804 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98002 2501200080 CLEOCO INC 17207 SE 46TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 2501200090 TIGER PROPERTIES LLC 140 S 294TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to Use AveryO Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edger"' i a AVERYO 5160® 1 A 2501200100 NORTHWEST THERAPY ASSOCIATE 1705 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2501200110 CLEOCO INC 17207 SE 46TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 CLEOCO INC 17207 SE 46TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98049 BBSG INVESTMENTS LLC 1617 S 325TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1621049049 7853600035 WILHELM M A & S M TRUSTEES PO BOX 4372 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1621049052 1621049023 2423200010 KIM ALEX WINSON AT FEDERAL WAY LLC 27216 SE 416TH ST 1120 112TH AVE NE #620 ENUMCLAW WA 98022 BELLEVUE WA 98004 1621049028 2423200020 FW TOWNE SQUARE L L C WASHINGTON FEDERAL S&LASSN P O BOX 98922 Attn: OWN REAL PROPERTY TACOMA WA 98498 425 PIKE ST SEATTLE WA 98101 1621049037 2423200030 BELMOR MOBILE HOME PARK LP ZION INC 2101 S 324TH ST 2202 S 320TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KOSTELICH THOMAS J 31005 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600036 1621049039 2423200040 7853600050 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT AWASHINGTON LLC PETTIGREW BUCK O+RHONDA S PO BOX 4249 14500 ROSCOE BLVD #203 31033 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 PANORAMA CITY CA 91402 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1621049041 2423200050 7853600055 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA WINSON AT FEDERAL WAY LLC SISSON TIMOTHY+MARY PO BOX 1919 1120 112TH AVE NE #620 31045 20TH AVE S WICHITA FALLS TX 76307 BELLEVUE WA 98004 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1621049042 2423200055 7853600060 CHTS INC WENDYS INTERNATIONAL INC CHOE PHILLIP S 1616 S 325TH ST PO BOX 256 35418 7TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 DUBLIN OH 43017 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 1621049043 2423200060 7853600061 KMS INVESTMENT INC WINSON AT FEDERAL WAY LLC ARNDT CAROL & GEORGE 167 S 295TH PL 1120 112TH AVE NE #620 PO BOX 1191 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BELLEVUE WA 98004 MILTON WA 98354 2423200070 7853600062 SOUND CREDIT UNION NOBLE JAMES H+BEVERLY K 1331 BROADWAY 32217 25TH AVE SW TACOMA WA 98402 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 Eticluettes faciles a peter ARepliez a la hachure afin de I Sens de vuww.avery.Com I Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160® j reveler le rebord Po u TM chargement p- p � 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 1 Easy Peel® Labels ♦ Bend along line to �RYO 5160® i Use Avery, O Template 51600 Feed Paper - expose Pop-up Edger" 1 7853600063 7853600155 7853600185 ARNDT CAROL & GEORGE PO BOX 1191 MILTON WA 98354 7853600065 JANG LEE LLC 344 NE 156TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97230 7853600070 SEATAC VILLAGE PROPERTY LLC 15919 MAIN ST E SUMNER WA 98390 7853600071 SEATAC VILLAGE PROPERTY LLC 15919 MAIN ST E SUMNER WA 98390 7853600072 SEATAC VILLAGE PROPERTY LLC 15919 MAIN ST E SUMNER WA 98390 7853600075 SPA FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 3691 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 7853600085 CALCATERRA KAREN S 17219 TIGER MOUNTAIN RD SE ISSAQUAH WA 98027 7853600086 CANDEE ENTERPRISES LLC 31215 41 ST PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600087 CANDEE ENTERPRISES LLC 31215 41 ST PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600091 CANDEE ENTERPRISES LLC 31215 41 ST PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 OKAMOTO KIYOSATO 1639 S 310TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600156 P KOKKO PROPERTIES LLC 2318 34TH ST SE PUYALLUP WA 98374 7853600157 HENDERSON LESLIE 3306 SW 323RD ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 7853600160 GOLDEN INVESTMENT FUND LLC PO BOX 3871 KENT WA 98032 7853600170 FEDERAL WAY INTERNATIONAL 1 1634 S 312TH ST #101 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600171 ROCZ LARRY R 3634 46TH SW SEATTLE WA 98116 7853600176 DIESING CHARLES F 4301 W VALLEY HWY E #100 SUMNER WA 98390 7853600180 FEDERAL WAY INTERNATIONAL 1 1634 S 312TH ST#101 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600181 TRAN TIEN THANH 1748 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600182 CHANG CHUN SOO+KEUM SOON 1636 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 SUNG TONY 7332 32ND AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 7853600186 JACK IN THE BOX 9330 BALBOAAVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 7853600187 MINKYU & MISOOK LLC 15647 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 7853600200 DOLLAR TREE STORES 500 VOLVO PKWY #300 CHESAPEAKE VA 23320 7853600212 FARRELL GROUP LLC 17786 DES MOINES MEMORIAL DR BURIEN WA 98148 7622400015 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO 3333 BEVERLY RD #BC-151A HOFFMAN ESTATES IL 60179 0537000525 BELL WILLIAM J & LADY DONNA 31014 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000530 MARKLAND RONALD L+VICKIE L 31002 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 5999700010 PACIFIC CONVENIENCE & FUELS Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT 7180 KOLL CENTER PKWAY #100 PLEASANTON CA 94566 LAI TONY+WONG HEIDI 609 107TH PL SE EVERETT WA 98208 0537000505 Eticluettes faciles a peler 11 A Repliez a la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 P P Sens de 1 chargement reveler le rebord Po u TM i 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel® Labels .Use Avery® Template 51600 0537000510 SCISCENTE STEVEN M+SONIA E 31030 24TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000511 KWON TAI HO+EVELYN J 5255 N OAK HILL RD FOND DULAC WI 54935 0537000512 ANALARYAN OLGA+GERASIM 31018 24TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000513 SMITH STEVAN M+SUSAN L 31012 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000520 LESH CHARLES PRESTON 31026 S 22ND AVE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000549 STOWERS DUANE B SR 31031 24TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000551 SIDORKO ALEKSANDR+TATIYANA 31025 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000552 MCKINLEY ROBERTA+NATALYA 31013 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000553 LUONG NICK Q+MAI L DANG 31019 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000571 VANCE JULIE L 31003 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 A Bend along line to , Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeT1 0537000572 BLANCHETTE COLLEEN V 30861 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000575 SLEEMAN RONALD L 31017 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000576 BROWN JAMES T+DANIELLE C 31021 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000577 VERBITSKY GERALD L+DEBORAH 31019 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000580 GILL SWARN S+KAMALJIT KAUR 31029 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000585 MCARTHUR CLARA E 31026 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000590 PARRETT JEANETTE M+LESLIE R 31012 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000591 BREWER BRUCE W+MARGARET C 31016 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003- PEREZLEONEL 31014 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 CADY BRIAN D 31034 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000592 0537000620 AVERY® 51600 I 1 0537000621 LO HERBERT DR 28921 5TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000622 KIM KWANG HOON+NAM SUNG 31044 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000623 PANLASIGUI AMORSOLO+RITA 9215 S 204TH ST KENT WA 98031 0537000625 PANLASIGUI AMORSOLO+RITA 9215 S 204TH ST KENT WA 98031 0537000630 CRESSE PAUL+YEUN 26623 LAKE FENWICK RD S KENT WA 98032 0537000631 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0537000635 FRASER DAVID+NOVELLA 2036 S 312TH FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000636 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0537000637 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0537000640 LE LUC TAN+THANH THI TRAN 30348 24TH PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles a peter I A I ' Utilisez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Sens de � j chargement reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 1 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to Use Avery® Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTN 1 0537000641 0537000656 GLAVATSKIY LEONID F BUTLER CLIFFORD 2042 S 312TH ST 31040 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000642 0537000660 PROKHOR VIKTOR MOMOTYUK YURIY+VALENTINA 2040 S 312TH ST 27327 48TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 KENT WA 98032 0537000645 0537000665 WHITEHEAD KAREN AKI EDWARD W+ELNA D 31055 22ND AVE S 2236 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000646 MURAGE ANTHONY+HANAH WAITH/ 31037 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000647 TOMSON ROBERT M+SALLY INNES 31045 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000650 MARRIOTT GUIYING 2214 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000651 HOLLY SCOTT 2204 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000652 RAUTIO PATRICK L 31054 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000653 WELLS BARBARA J 31052 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000655 BODEN SHANNON F 31046 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 l ticluettes faciles a peter t Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 i 0537000670 SHEMER OLEG+ALINA S 31102 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000672 BELLALICIA F 31113 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000675 TAYLOR SALLY J 32228 46TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0537000680 BROWN NICHAEL N 3177 LAS BRISAS WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 0537000685 TSAI JULIA 4424 S 332ND PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98001 0537000690 READ STEVE 12108 18TH ST E EDGEWOOD WA 98372 7622400011 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 ♦ ' Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de charaement reveler le rebord Pop-upTM i 7622400025 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400019 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400018 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400017 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400014 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400013 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400012 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400010 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7853600210 7-ELEVEN Attn: C/O RYAN LLC 13155 NOEL RD STE 100 LB73 DALLAS TX 75240 7622400020 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel® Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to -_! Jl�e Ave ® � AVERYO 51600 yO Template 51600 Feed Paper � expose Pop-up Edger^` " j 7622400021 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 0921049299 SENIOR CITY LP 123 E 96TH ST TACOMA WA 98445 0921049298 CPSRTA (SOUND TRANSIT) 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104 0921049054 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 33330 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049221 FWP VENTURES LLLP 7525 SE 24TH ST #315 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 1500500120 HARSCH INVEST PROPERTIE LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0537000671 CHONG BAEK E 31105 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7622400016 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 0821049062 ALBERTSONS LLC Attn: CO PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440 0921049166 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 0921049113 LIU TIEN TSAI+CHUEN HWA 31448 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049258 LIU TIEN T 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0537000595 PHAN LONG 31000 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000593 PHAN LONG 31000 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000594 PHAN LONG 31000 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 ' ' Se de Repliez a la hachure afin de i www.averycom ' reveler le rebord Po u *"' 1-800-GO-AVERY chargement p- p AL 41kCITY 40"::S:;P OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www,cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Other L:" [ F5 R (5 was 4mailed ❑ faxed 16e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on '7Z>cz- 3'0 t-3 I _, 2015. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date Of _ 91-1 -,7r� l4 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/18/2015 9:45:00 AM CITY OFFEDERALWAY CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION SEIS Distribution List FINAL SEIS DISTRIBUTION LIST1 NATIONAL, STATE, COUNTY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT * City of Auburn —ksn de ci.aubum.wa.us, 25 W Main, Auburn, WA 98001 * City of Algona— gLamnner ci ofal eona.com, 402 Warde St, Algona, WA 98001-8505 * City of Des Moines —dlathror a desmoineswa.eov, 21630 11`h Ave S, Ste D, Des Moines, WA 98198 * City of Edgewood— cit hal I _ cityofedgcwood.org, 2224 1041h Meridian Ave E, Edgewood, WA 98372 * City of Federal Way, Chief of Staff- brian.wilson cii offederalway. cam, 33325 8`h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 * City of Federal Way, Economic Development— titnsahnson ct cityof ederalway.com, 33325 8`h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 * City of Federal Way, Public Works— marwan.sal_lou_m(g cityol€ederalway.com, 33325 81h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 * City of Fife— sfriddleAcitvolfife.org, 5411 23'd St E, Fife, WA 98424 * City of Kent —plannin kentwa.gov, 400 W Gowe St, Ste 300, Kent, WA 98032 * City of Milton— clarson@citvofinilton.net, 1000 Laurel St, Milton, WA 98354 * City of Pacific— idcdge(iki_oacif ic.wa.us, 100 Third Ave SE, Pacific, WA 98047 * City of Tacoma—sltirlev.schultz(tr�.ci.tacoma.wa.us, 747 Market St, Tacoma, WA 98402 Econ. Dev. Council of Seattle & King Co.—info(Rede-seaking.vrg, 1301 5`h Ave, Ste 1500, Seattle, WA 98101 * EPA Environmental Review Section —ena-seattlrC@ena.eov, 1200 60, Ave MD-126, Seattle, WA 98101 * Federal Way Library — 34200 1'` Way S, Federal Way, WA 98003 * Federal Way 320th Library — 848 S 320`h, Federal Way, WA 98003 * Federal Way Public Schools — mascime EWs.org, 33330 8`h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 King Co Dept. of Natural Res —kevin.k"teman@kingcountv.g0vv, 201 S Jackson St, Ste 701, Seattle, WA 98104-3855 King Co Dept. of Permitting & Environ. Review— 35030 SE Douglas St, #210, Snoqualmie, WA 98065-9266 * King Co Dept. of Transportation—tarold.taniguchi(r4kinscounty.gov, 201 S. Jackson St, KSC-TR-0815, Seattle, WA 98104 King Co Parks & Rec—matthew.peerkin<e4kingeountv.eov, 201 S Jackson St, #700, Seattle, WA 98104 King Co Roads Division —maint.roads(7r kin¢countygov, 155 Monroe Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 King Co Transit Div. Env. Planning— eary.kriedt@kingcounty cov, 201 S Jackson St, Seattle, WA 98104-3856 King Co Wastewater Treatment Environmental Pln Oap — MS KSC-NR-0505, 201 S Jackson St, Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Metro Transit —customer. comments(cZkingcounty.¢ov, 201 S Jackson St, KSC-TR-0324 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Pierce County Planning & Land Services — aclark ti+comierce.wa.us, 2401 S 35`h St, Tacoma, WA 98409 Pierce County Public Works & Utilities —bziegle@co.pierce.wa.us, 2702 S 42°1 St, Ste 628, Tacoma, WA 98409 * Pierce Transit —bhan&iercetransit.org & tvaslet r(_,piercetransit.org, PO Box 99070, Lakewood, WA 98496-0070 * Puget Sound Clean Air Agency—sepa0w_ascicanair.ora, 1904 3`a Ave, Ste 105, Seattle, WA 98101-3317 * Puget Sound Regional Council—eharrisreunsrc.org, 1011 Western Ave, #500, Seattle, WA 98104 * Sound Transit —perry.weinberK&soundtransit.org, 401 S Jackson St, Seattle, WA 98104 * South King County Fire & Rescue — chris.irigham _ southkinQf re.org, 31617 1" Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 * WA Dept. of Archaeology & Historic Preservation—gretchen.kaehlet ram+ dahp.wa.gov. PO Box 48343, Olympia, WA 98504-8343 * WA Dept. of Commerce, Growth Mgmt Svcs—reviewteam(&commcrce.wa.gov, PO Box 42525, Olympia, WA 98504-2525 * WA Dept. of Ecology (2, email & paper mailed)—gWaregist ecy.■va.¢ov, SEPA Unit, PO Box 47703, Olympia, WA 98504- 7703 Appendix 1 Page 1 CITY OFFEDERALWAY CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION SEIS * WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife — wfwoctap a,fws.uov, PO Box 43200, Olympia, WA 98504-3155 * WA Dept. of Natural Resources — PO Box 47015, Olympia, WA 98504-7015 * WA Dept. of Transportation — ramin. aaooki wsdot.wa. av &boiotiI(@,wsdot.wa.goy, PO Box 330310, Seattle, WA 98133- 9710 TRIBES * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division—karen.walterfF muckleshoot.nsn.us139015 172"a Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Tribal Archaeologist — j&ra.muMhv@muekleshoot.nsn.us, 39015 172"a Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 * Puyallup Tribe of Indians Historic Preservation Dept.—btandon.reyiton(c�,puyalluptribe.com, 3009 E Portland Ave, Tacoma, WA 98404 * Suquamish Tribe THP Office—dlwearchrr suquamish.i15n.us, 18490 Suquamish Way, Suquamish, WA 98392 UTILITIES AT&T Cable Maintenance OSP Engineering WA/OR/N.ID—roberia.anderson(asienaenginceriiiizarouio.com, 11241 Willows Road NE, Ste 130, Redmond, WA 98052-1009 Bonneville Power Association TER 3 — 28401 Covington Way SE, Kent, WA 98065 Comeast Cable —4020 Auburn Way N, Auburn, WA 98002-1315 * Lakehaven Utility District — basbur Ceulakehaven.orP, PO Box 4249, Federal Way, WA 98063 Century Link —victonnovelo"centurvlink.com, 2510 841h St S, Ste 18, Lakewood, WA 98499-9034 Puget Sound Energy — kristina.k ]e se_com, PO Box 97034, Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 I MEDIA I Federal Way Miror—editor(cDfcdcralwaymirror.corn, 31919 1" Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 Tacoma News Tribune —newstios0then ewstribun e.coat, 1950 S State St, Tacoma, WA 98405 ORGANIZATIONS Federal Way Chamber of Commerce — rmartin(F),fedemlwaycltatnber.com, PO Box 3440, Federal Way, WA 98063 Master Builders Assoc. of King & Snohomish Counties—dhoffman&mbaks.com, 335 116`h Ave SE, Bellevue, WA 98004-6407 Sea/King Co Assoc/Realtors — sampace (r concentric.net, 29839 154`h Ave SE, Kent, WA 98042-4557 WA Environmental Council—wecnalnWrotects.org 1402 3ra Ave, Ste 1400, Seattle, WA 98101-2179 INDIVIDUALS H. David Kaplan —hdk1934 hotrnail.wm, 30240 27`h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 Property Owners Within the Planned Action Area and Within 600 feet of the Boundary (Per King County Assessor Records) t *RECEIVED AN ELECTRONIC COPY (via listed email) OR CD OF ALL DOCUMENTS; ALL OTHERS RECEIVED ONLY COVER LETTER/NOTICE. Appendix 1 Page 2 Stacey Welsh From: Tina Piety Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 8:20 AM To: info@edc-seaking.org; 'matthew.perkins@kingcounty.gov'; maint.roads@kingcounty.gov; gary.kriedt@kingcounty.gov; customer.comments@kingcounty.gov, aclark@co.pierce.wa.us; bziegle@co.pierce.wa.us; 'roberta.anderSon@sienaengineeringgroup.com'; 'victor.novelo@centerylink.com'; 'kristina.kyle@pse.com'; editor@fedwaymirror.com; 'newstips@thenewstribune.com'; 'martin@federalwaychamber.com'; D Hoffman (dhoffman@mbaks.com); 'Sam Pace'; 'wec@wecprotects.org'; H. David Kaplan Cc: Stacey Welsh; Isaac Conlen Subject: Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS Attachments: Final Cover Letter.pdf Hello, On December 30, 2015, the City of Federal Way adopted the Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS. Attached you will find a cover letter notice. The referenced documents may be found on the city's website at http://www.Gi.federal-way.wa.us/index.aspx?NID--503. If you would like more information about this proposal, or have questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stacey. w el sh&c ityoffederaiway. cam. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.Gity ffederaIway.com Stacey Welsh From: Tina Piety Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 8:10 AM To: 'ksnyder@ci.auburn.wa.us'; 'planner@cityofalgona.com'; 'dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov'; 'cityhall@cityofedgewood.org'; Brian Wilson; Tim Johnson; Marwan Salloum; Michael Morales; 'sfriddle@cityoffife.org'; 'planning@kentwa.gov'; 'clarson@cityofmilton.net'; 'jdodge@ci.pacific.wa.us'; 'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; 'epa-Seattle@epa.gov'; 'tmascime@fwps.org'; 'harold.taniguchi@kingcounty.gov'; 'bhan@piercetransit.org'; 'tvasiet@piercetransit.org'; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; 'eharris@psrc.org'; 'perry.weinberg@soundtransit.org'; Chris Ingham; 'gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov'; 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; 'ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov)'; 'wfwoctap@fws.gov'; 'ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'bolotil@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'karen.walter@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com'; 'dlewarch@suquamish.nsn.org'; 'basbury@lakehaven.org' Cc: Stacey Welsh; Isaac Conlen Subject: Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS Attachments: Final Appendix 2.pdf Hello. Attached you will find the Appendix 2 for the Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS. The documents may also be found on the city's website at http://www.ei.federal-way.wa.uslindex.aspx?N_I_D=503. If you would like more information about this proposal, or have questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835- 2634, or stacey.welsh(3,cilyoffederalway.com. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II Ae.ry a Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com Stacey Welsh From: Tina Piety Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 8:10 AM To: 'ksnyder@ci.auburn.wa.us'; 'planner@ cityofalgona.com'; 'dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov'; 'cityhall@cityofedgewood.org'; Brian Wilson; Tim Johnson; Marwan Salloum; Michael Morales; 'sfriddle@cityoffife.org'; 'planning@kentwa.gov'; 'clarson@cityofmilton.net'; 'jdodge@ci.pacific.wa.us';'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; 'epa-Seattle@epa.gov'; 'tmascime@fwps.org'; 'harold.taniguchi@kingcounty.gov'; 'bhan@piercetransit.org'; 'tvaslet@piercetransit.org'; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; 'eharris@psrc.org'; 'perry.weinberg@soundtransit.org'; Chris Ingham; 'gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov'; 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; 'ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov)'; 'wfwoctap@fws.gov'; 'ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'bolotil@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'karen.waiter@muckleshoot. nsn.us'; 'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com'; 'dlewarch@suquamish.nsn.org'; 'basbury@lakehaven.org' Cc: Stacey Welsh; Isaac Conlen Subject: Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS Attachments: Final Appendix Lpdf Hello, Since the attachments were too large for some, I'm resending the appendices in separate emails. Also, please note that the publication date is December 30, 2015, not the 15th as stated in my first email. Attached you will find Appendix 1for the Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS. The documents may also be found on the city's website at littp://www.ei.federal-way.wq us/index.asnx?NID=503. If you would like more information about this proposal, or have questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835- 2634, or stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II cnv o. `� Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityof derma^com Stacey Welsh From: Tina Piety Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:50 PM To: 'ksnyder@ci.auburn.wa.us'; 'planner@cityofalgona.com'; 'dlath rop@desmoineswa.gov'; 'cityhall@cityofedgewood.org'; Brian Wilson; Tim Johnson; Marwan Salloum; Michael Morales; 'sfriddle@cityoffife.org'; 'planning@kentwa.gov'; 'clarson@cityofmilton.net'; 'jdodge@ci.pacific.wa.us'; 'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; 'epa-Seattle@epa.gov'; 'tmascime@fwps.org'; 'harold.taniguchi@kingcounty.gov'; 'bhan@piercetransit.org'; 'tvaslet@piercetransit.org'; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; 'eharris@psrc.org'; 'perry.weinberg@soundtransit.org'; Chris Ingham; 'gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov'; 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; 'ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov)'; 'wfwoctap@fws.gov'; 'ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'bolotil@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'karen.waiter@muckleshoot.nsn.us';'laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com'; 'dlewarch@suquamish.nsn.org'; 'basbury@lakehaven.org' Cc: Stacey Welsh; Isaac Conlen Subject: Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS Attachments: Final Appendix 1.pdf, Final Appendix 2.pdf Hello, As stated in my first email, attached you will find the appendices for the Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS. The documents may also be found on the city's website at http://www.ei.federal-way.wa.us/index.aspx?NID=503. If you would like more information about this proposal, or have questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stacey.welsh(7a@cityoffederalway.com. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II A Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.city,offederalway.com Stacey Welsh From: Tina Piety Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:47 PM To: 'ksnyder@ci.auburn.wa.us'; 'planner@cityofalgona.com'; dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov; cityhall@cityofedgewood.org; Brian Wilson; Tim Johnson; Marwan Salloum; Michael Morales; sfriddle@cityoffife.org; 'planning@kentwa.gov'; 'clarson@cityofmilton.net'; 'jdodge@ci.pacific.wa.us'; 'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; 'epa-Seattle@epa.gov'; 'tmascime@fwps.org'; harold.taniguchi@kingcounty.gov; bhan@piercetransit.org; tvaslet@piercetransit.org; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; eharris@psrc.org; peiry.weinberg@soundtransit.org; Chris Ingham; gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov, 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov); wfwoctap@fws.gov; 'ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'bolotil@wsdot.wa.gov'; karen.walter@muckleshoot.nsn.us; laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us; brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com; 'dlewarch@suquamish.nsn.org'; basbury@lakehaven.org Cc: Stacey Welsh; Isaac Conlen Subject: Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS Attachments: Final Cover Letter.pdf, Final SEIS.pdf Hello, On December 15, 2015, the City of Federal Way adopted the Federal Way Final City Center Planned Action SEIS. Attached you will find a cover letter and the FSEIS (appendices will be sent in a second email). The documents may also be found on the city's website at http://www.ei.federal-way.wa.us/index.aspx?NID=503. If you would like more information about this proposal, or have questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835- 2634, or stacey.welshOa cityoffederalway.com. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II - Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www. c ityoffe d e ra I way. co m STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1011 Plum Srreer SE • PO Box 42525 • Olympia, IWa hingron 98504-2525 • (360) 725-4000 www.commerce.wa.gov November 17, 2015 Stacey Welsh Associate Planner City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003 Dear Ms. Welsh: Thank you for sending the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce) the following materials as required under RCW 36.70A.106. Please keep this letter as documentation that you have met this procedural requirement. City of Federal Way - Proposed procedural text amendment to FWRC 14.15.130, to renew the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SETS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. These materials were received on November 13, 2015 and processed with the Material ID # 21827. We have forwarded a copy of this notice to other state agencies. If this submitted material is an adopted amendment, then please keep this letter as documentation that you have met the procedural requirement under RCW 36.70A.106. If you have submitted this material as a draft amendment, then final adoption may occur no earlier than January 12, 2016. Please remember to submit the final adopted amendment to Commerce within ten (10) days of adoption. If you have any questions, please contact Growth Management Services at reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov, or call Dave Andersen (509) 434-4491. Sincerely, Review Team Growth Management Services Stacey Welsh From: COM GMU Review Team <reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 8:49 AM To: Stacey Welsh Subject: Acknowledgement Letter City of Federal Way Material ID_21827 Attachments: AckLetter 11-15.pdf Attached is the acknowledgement letter regarding: Proposed procedural text amendment to FWRC 14.1 5.130, to renew the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.440 and WAC 197-1 1-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. For more convenient and faster service please contact the Review Team at reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov or call 360.725.4047 if you have any questions. Please retain this letter for your records. Stacey Welsh From: Bolotin, Leah <BolotiL@wsdot.wa.gov> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 4:13 PM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Prestrud, Charles; Pazooki, Ramin; Brown, Rob Subject: draft WSDOT comments on DSEIS for Federal Way City Center Stacy, I had a chance to review the DSEIS-PA for the Federal Way City Center development envelope of increased land use denisty. I would like to congratulate Federal Way on planning for moving ahead with plans to create a vibrant, mixed use, walkable City Center. Sounds like it will be something to travel to Federal Way for! As discussed, WSDOT has a few questions/concerns regarding the adoption of a V/C of 1.1 as the transportation LOS standard, as well as the forecasted increase in collisions. Please consider this email a draft until Federal Way has a chance to review and request any desired edits. After your review, we will forward a formal letter of comment; this draft is to ensure that our comments are received by the deadline which is today, Nov 16th. Level of Service Federal Way has adopted a V/C of 1.1 as an overall LOS standard for intersections. The DSEIS states "None of the intersections are anticipated to be deficient in the Action Alternative based on Federal Way's traffic operations standards," meaning above a V/C of 1.1. Level of service standards have traditionally been developed as an average intersection delay of between A and F. Many jurisidictions are beginning to utilize a V/C ratio rather than traditional A-F measure of delay. Although a specific crosswalk between A-F LOS and V/C ratios has not been widely accepted, a V/C ratio greater than 1.0 is generally considered equivalent to a traditional intersection delay LOS of F. Local jurisdictions set the LOS standard for their local transportation network. However, WSDOT sets LOS standards for Highways of Statewide Significance<http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/6AF72388-2455-47B9-B72D- 2BE9A89AOE19/0/LOSStandardsforWAHwys.pdf>, (also available in Appendix G of the Highway System Plan<http://wsdot.wa.gov/planning/HSP>) and PSRC sets LOS standards for non-HSS highways, or Highways of Regional Significance<http://www.psrc.org/transportation/t2040/los/>. Ramp intersections with local arterials are included in the WSDOT/PSRC purview for setting LOS standards. The adoption of a V/C standard of 1.1 therefore does not apply to intersections on state facilities. State highways in and adjacent to the City Center are: Highway ID Highway Category Adopted LOS 1-5 HSS D SR 18 HSS D SR 99 HSS D SR 161 HRS E/mitigated SR 509 HRS E/mitigated The TIA and SDEIS show forecast PM peak hour LOS operations below the WSDOT LOS standard at six intersections on SR 99, and below the PSRC LOS standard at one intersection on SR 161, for both the No Action and Action Alternatives: Federal Way City Center Planned Action Development Envelope for Higher Density Land Use PM Peak Hour LOS Intersection Existing 2025 No Action 2025 Action Adopted Standard SR 99 S 288th Street D F F D S 320th Street E E E D* S 324th Street D E E D S 336th Street D E E D S 348th Street E F F D* S 356th Street D E E D SR 161 S 348th Street E F F E/Mitigated *When a development affects a segment or intersection where the existing LOS is already below the adopted standard, the pre -development LOS is to be used instead of the otherwise applicable deficiency level. This would apply to the SR 99 intersections with S 320th and S 348th Streets, i.e., their LOS should not be degraded any lower than it already is, which is LOS E. WSDOT understands and supports the concept of compact, walkable centers, and that the proposed mixed -use land use pattern, on -site improvements, and TDM actions and high levels of transit service are expected to reduce vehicle trips. It is also stated in the SDEIS that the increased capacity associated with improvement projects will help to mitigate impacts. We assume, however, that both the anticipated higher mode splits and funded improvement projects are included in the future baseline modeling for the TIA that resulted in the above forecasts. If not, then please provide the analysis showing how the non -motorized and transit amentities, and/or funded capital improvements are expected to mitigate the expected increase in peak hour trips. Since the SDEIS is being proposed as a planned action, this will be WSDOT's only opportunity to request mitigation on state facilities for the additional 2150-2275 pm peak hour trips forecast for the Action and No Action alternatives. The development envelope of the City Center subarea being proposed for high density land use is directly adjacent to five state facilities. The increase is being proposed as a SEPA action. Under SEPA, when proposed development would degrade state facilities below the adopted LOS threshold, the facilities are considered deficient to support the development, and WSDOT and its partners may seek reasonable and proportionate mitigation of traffic impacts. We therefore disagree with the statement that "based on the level of service (LOS) analysis, no additional roadway capacity improvements are needed." Please provide the analysis showing how proposed improvements will mitigate the transportation impacts on state facilities to an approximation of their adopted LOS standards. Otherwise, the impacts to state facilities from the increased land use density will require more mitigation than what is proposed to bring those intersections into compliance with the adopted LOS standard. For specific mitigation approaches, please contact Ramin Pazooki, NW Region Development Office Manager, at 206- 440-4710 or ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov. Collisions The SDEIS states that there is a probability of traffic collisions increasing with additional traffic. It is additionally stated that "Both the Action and No Action Alternatives would increase the total vehicle volume of vehicles at the high collision locations identified in Table 3-12." (p 3-19) Target Zero<http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/planning/SHSP.htm>, the state's Strategic Highway Safety Plan, is the adopted plan to help guide investments to achieve zero fatal and serious injury collisions on all public roads by 2030. We are therefore also wondering if Federal Way has adopted the Target Zero goals, and what the City proposes to do about the anticipated increase in collision rates. For assistance with specific safety improvements, please contact Rob Brown, WSDOT Traffic Engineer for Federal Way, at 206-440-4413 or rob.brown@wsdot.wa.gov. Thank you for the opportunity to review the DSEIS for your City Center. Please let me know if Federal Way wishes to edit this draft comment letter prior to its finalization. We can discuss changes, or Federal Way can submit comments or edits via email. We would also be glad to come down to discuss face-to-face. Sincerely, Leah Leah Bolotin, AICP Senior Planner WSDOT Sno-King Planning Office Phone: 206-440-5057 Comprehensive Planning Resources<http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/planning/community/GMA.htm> Stacey Welsh From: Stacey Welsh Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 3:10 PM To: 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov' Subject: Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment Attachments: Commerce-Notice-60-Day-CoverSheet.doc; Draft 2016 Ordinance.doc; Draft Exhibit A.pdf, Draft Exhibit B.docx Good afternoon, Please find the enclosed Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment to the Federal Way Revised Code, Section 14.15.130 (City center planned action), a procedural text amendment. The draft Ordinance and its Exhibits A & B are also enclosed. Let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you, Stacey Welsh, AICP Senior Planner c rr w Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2634 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com Department of Commerce 1 n ova O1 _Js iou r a _ at. '.' , C'# Notice of Intent to Adopt Amendment 60 Days Prior to Adoption Indicate one (or both, if applicable): ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ® Development Regulation Amendment Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the following jurisdiction provides notice of intent to adopt a proposed comprehensive plan amendment and/or development regulation amendment under the Growth Management Act. Jurisdiction: Mailing Address: Date: City of Federal Way 33325 8 Avenue South Federal Way. WA 98003-6325 11-13-15 Contact Name: Stacey Welsh Title/Position: Phone Number: Senior Planner 253-835-2634 E-mail Address: stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com Brief Description of the Proposed/Draft Amendment: If this draft amendment is provided to supplement an existing 60-day notice already submitted, then please provide the date the original notice was submitted and the Commerce Material ID number located in your Commerce acknowledgement letter. Is this action part of the scheduled review and update? GMA requires review every 8 years under RCW 36.70A.130 4 - 6 . Public Hearing Date: Proposed Adoption Date: Proposed procedural text amendment to FWRC 14.15.130, to renew the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Yes: No: X Planning Board/Commission: N/A Council/County Commission: 1-19-16 January 19, 2016 REQUIRED: Attach or include a copy of the proposed amendment text or document(s). Rev 03/2015 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Federal Way, Washington; relating to the City Center Planned Action established pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440; and amending FWRC 14.15.130. (Amending Ordinance Nos. 14-779,10-659, 07-552, and 07-547) WHEREAS, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and its implementing regulations authorize cities planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA) to designate planned actions that have had their significant impacts adequately addressed in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared in conjunction with a comprehensive plan, subarea plan, fully contained community, master planned resort, master planned development, or a phased project; and WHEREAS, RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164, -168, and -172 allow and govern the application of a Planned Action designation; and WHEREAS, the City of Federal Way is located within an urban growth area and has adopted a Comprehensive Plan that addresses the City Center subarea and has prepared an EIS and SEIS that consider a planned action designation in a portion of the City Center subarea, and; WHEREAS, Chapter 7 of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan addresses the City Center subarea and contains policy CCP5 that states that the City should "[u]tilize the SEPA Planned Action to provide streamlined permit review in the City Center in order to accelerate progress towards meeting the vision"; and WHEREAS, designation of a project as a planned action streamlines subsequent review of the project by eliminating the need for preparation of a threshold determination or EIS; and WHEREAS, the City Council enacted Ordinance No. 07-547 on February 20, 2007, Ordinance No. 16- Page I of 10 Rev 1/]5 establishing the City Center Planned Action, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031; and WHEREAS, the City Council enacted Ordinance No. 14-779 on December 2, 2014, approving a short-term extension of the designated development timeframe for a period of nine (9) months. During that time the city conducted a detailed transportation analysis, as part of a plan to subsequently extend the EIS for a longer period of time; and WHEREAS, renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action with appropriate standards and procedures will help achieve permit processing efficiency and promote environmental quality; and WHEREAS, on October 16, 2015, the City issued a Draft Supplemental EIS to the City Center Planned Action EIS; and WHEREAS, the City considered comments and issued a Final Supplemental EIS on December X, 2015; and WHEREAS, proposed development within the City Center Planned Action area is subject to the mitigation measures identified by the Planned Action Supplemental EIS; and WHEREAS, the Land Use and Transportation Committee (LUTC) of the Federal Way City Council considered these code amendments on January 4, 2016, and recommended adoption of the text amendments as recommended by staff. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 14.15.130 of the FWRC is hereby amended to read as follows: Ordinance No. 16- Page 2 of 10 Rev 1/15 14.15.130 City center planned action. (1) Purpose. The city of Federal Way declares that the purpose of this section is to: (a) Combine environmental analysis with land use planning; and (b) Set forth a procedure designating certain project actions in a portion of the city center subarea as "planned actions" consistent with state law RCW 43.21C.440; and (c) Streamline and expedite the land use permit review process by relying on completed and existing environmental analysis for the planned action area; and (d) Apply the Federal Way Revised Code together with the mitigation framework in subsection (3) of this section for the purpose of processing planned action development applications. (2) Findings. The city of Federal Way finds that: (a) The city of Federal Way is required to prepare and implement plans in accordance with the provisions of the Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW; (b) The city of Federal Way has adopted a comprehensive plan and city center subarea plan in compliance with the GMA; (c) The city center planned action environmental impact statement identifies and addresses all significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed planned action as defined in subsection (3) of this section; (d) The mitigation measures contained in Exhibit B of Ordinance07 5 47 16-XYZ, together with applicable city development standards, are adequate to mitigate the significant adverse environmental impacts of planned action development as defined in subsection (3)(c) of this section, subject to project review; (e) The expedited permit review procedures as set forth in this section are and will be a benefit to the public, protect the environment, and enhance economic development; and (f) Opportunities for public involvement and review have been provided, and comments considered as part of preparation of the draft and final planned action supplemental environmental impact statement. (3) Procedures and criteria for evaluating and determining projects as planned actions. (a) Planned action site. The planned action designation shall apply to the approximately 200215-acre site generally bounded by South 312th Street on the north, South 324th Street Ordinance No. 16- Page 3 of 10 Rev 1115 on the south, Pacific Highway South on the west and 23rd Avenue South on the east. Additional area is located east of 23Fd Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 3 I7`h Street and on the south by South 319"' Place and shown in Exhibit A of Ordinance 07 547 16-XY7._ (b) Environmental document. A planned action designation for a site -specific application shall be based on the environmental analysis contained in the city center planned action supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) completed by the city on-gepten*er 8, 2006 December X, 2015. "SEIS" means the city center planned action supplemental environmental impact statement composed of the draft SEIS (tee 2006 October 2015) and the final SEIS (September- December 2015). The mitigation document (Exhibit B of Ordinance 07-547 16-XYZ) is based upon the analysis of the SEIS. The mitigation document, together with applicable city codes, ordinances and standards, shall provide the framework for the decision by the city to impose conditions on a planned action project. (c) Planned action qualifications. (i) Land uses. The following uses are the primary uses analyzed in, the SEIS. (A) Retail goods and services. (B) Office. (C) Lodging. (D) Residential. (E) Givie-. «) c+,.,,,.t,,,.oa par -king, (ii) Development thresholds. The planned action designation applies to future development proposals that cumulatively do not exceed the development envelope established by the SEIS, as shown in the planned action development envelope table below: City Center- Summa Planned Action Development Envelope Table Uses Development Envelope Retail 7-59,000 475,000 sf Office 300,000 sf Ordinance No. 16- Page 4 of 10 Rev 1115 Lodging 600 rooms Residential 7-5&2, 000 units die 504,4004 The planned action designation also applies to demolition of existing buildings an par -king f eilities development. If proposed plans significantly change the location of uses in a manner that would alter the environmental determinations of the SEIS, additional SEPA review may be required. Additional environmental review may be conducted as an addendum or supplement to the planned action SEIS. Shifting the total build -out of development among uses may be permitted so long as the total build -out does not exceed the aggregate amount of development, trip generation and parking thresholds reviewed in the SEIS and so long as the impacts of that development have been identified and mitigated in the SEIS and mitigation document. - (iii) The project is located within the planned action area. (iv) Transportation. (A) Vehicle trip ranges generation. The r&Hges =f votrips generation alternatives reviewed in the SEIS are as follows: F.F." MR, "11 M., 11 SSlia!!�• �!■• Y.tea r R 1Si71Ti r! Ordinance No. 16- Page 5 of 10 Rev 1/15 - - Trip Generation by Alternative Trip Generation by Alternative 2025 No Action 2025 Action Alternative Alternative Time Period Total Trips Total Trips AM Peak Hour 3,040 3,617 PM Peak Hour 6,919 ---F-6,792 The SEIS conducted quantitative analysis on a per -intersection basis of impacts and mitigation through 2009 2025 (or the equivalent time, based on the cumulative totals of projected vehicle trips). 918 analy-ss of 2010 'n�vehiele works ,a +, (B) Trip threshold. Proposed development that would result in a cumulative total of trips that exceeds the maximum trip levels shown above would not qualify as a planned action. (C) Public works discretion. The public works director shall have discretion to determine incremental and total trip generation, consistent with the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) General Manual (latest ed.), for each planned action project permit application proposed under this planned action. (v) Elements of the environment analyzed in the SEIS. A project that would result in a significant change in impacts to any of the elements of the environment identified in the SEIS would not qualify as a planned action. (vi) Time horizon. The planned action designation is intended to be applicable until all development shown in the planned action development envelope table (subsection (3)(c)(ii) of this section) is constructed or until Septe f ber- 30, 2015 the end of year 2025, whichever occurs first. In addition, should environmental conditions significantly change from those analyzed in the SEIS, the city's SEPA official may determine that the planned action designation is no longer applicable Ordinance No. 16- Page 6 of 10 Rev 1115 unless additional, supplementary environmental review is conducted, regardless of the date. (d) Planned action review criteria. (i) Uses and activities described in the SEIS, subject to the qualifications described in subsection (3)(c) of this section and the mitigation measures in Exhibit B of Ordinance 07-547 16-XYZ, may be designated planned actions pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.440. (ii) The SEPA official or designee is authorized to designate a project application as a planned action pursuant to RCW 43.21 C.440, if the project meets all of the following conditions: (A) The project is not otherwise exempt from SEPA; and (B) The project is consistent with the city of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan adopted under Chapter 36.70A RCW; and (C) The project is subsequent to or is implementing a project which has had its significant adverse environmental impacts that have been adequately identified in the SEIS; and (D) The project falls within the planned action qualifications identified in subsection (3)(c) of this section; and (E) The SEPA official has determined that the project's adverse impacts are able to be mitigated through the application and/or inclusion of mitigation measures detailed in the mitigation document in Exhibit B of Ordinance 07-547 16-XYZ, as well as other applicable city, county, state, and federal requirements and conditions, which together constitute sufficient mitigation for the significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed project; and (F) The proposed project complies with all applicable local, county, state, and federal regulations, and, where appropriate, the proposed project complies with needed variances or modifications or other special permits have been identified; and (G) The proposed project is not an essential public facility. (e) Effect of planned action. (i) Upon designation by the SEPA official that the development proposal within the planned action area qualifies as a planned action pursuant to this section and WAC Ordinance No. 16- Page 7 of 10 Rev 1115 197-11-172, the project shall not be subject to a SEPA threshold determination, an environmental impact statement (EIS), SEPA appeal or any other additional review under SEPA. (ii) Being designated as a planned action or planned action project means that a proposed project has been reviewed in accordance with this section and found to be consistent with the development parameters and environmental analysis included in the SEIS. (iii) Planned action projects will not be subject to further procedural review under SEPA. However, as stated under subsection (3)(d)(ii)(F) of this section, in order to qualify as planned actions, these projects will have incorporated mitigating measures identified in the city center planned action SEIS, as outlined in this document and Exhibit B (attached to Ordinance 07 547 15-XYZ), which are designed to mitigate environmental impacts resulting from the project proposal. Additionally, projects will be subject to applicable city, state and federal regulatory requirements. The planned action designation shall not exempt a project from meeting the city's code and ordinance requirements apart from the SEPA process. (f) Planned action permit process. The director of community development ser-viees or designee shall review projects and determine whether they meet the criteria as planned actions under applicable state, federal, and local laws, regulations, codes and ordinances. The review procedure shall consist, at a minimum, of the following: (i) Development applications will meet the requirements of FWRC Titles 4, 8, 11 (Division III), 13, 14, 15 and 19 and Chapter 1.35 FWRC. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the city and shall include a planned action checklist or such other project review forms provided by the community development, ' , and public works departments. The checklist may be incorporated into the form of an application. (ii) The director of community development swill determine whether the application is complete as provided in FWRC 19.15.0405. (iii) After the city receives and reviews a complete application, the SEPA official shall determine, utilizing the criteria and procedures contained in subsection (3)(d) of this section and WAC 197-11-172, whether the project qualifies as a planned action. If the project does qualify as a planned action, the director of community development serviees shall notify the applicant, and the project shall proceed in accordance with the appropriate permit procedures, except that no additional SEPA review, threshold determination or EIS will be required. Ordinance No. 16- Page 8 of 10 Rev 1/15 (iv) For projects that qualify as planned actions, public notice shall be provided as specified in FWRC 14.15.060(3). (v) If a project is determined not to be a planned action, the director of community development yes shall notify the applicant and prescribe a SEPA review procedure consistent with the city SEPA procedures and state laws. The notice to the applicant shall describe the elements of the application that result in disqualification as a planned action. (vi) Projects disqualified as a planned action may use or incorporate relevant elements of the environmental review analysis in the SEIS prepared for the planned action, as well as other environmental review documents to assist in meeting SEPA requirements. The SEPA official may choose to limit the scope of the SEPA review to those issues and environmental impacts not previously addressed in the SEIS. (4) Planned action area monitoring. The city center planned action section shall be reviewed periodically by the director of community development Ito determine its continuing validity with respect to the environmental conditions of the project area and vicinity and applicability of planned action requirements, to ensure continued applicability of the transportation analysis and impacts. Based upon this review, this section may be amended as needed, and another review period may be specified. (5) Conflict. In the event of a conflict between this section or any mitigation measures imposed pursuant thereto and any ordinance or regulation of the city, the provisions of this section shall control. Section 2. Severability. Should any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this chapter, or its application to any person or situation, be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter or its application to any other person or situation. The City Council of the City of Federal Way hereby declares that it would have adopted this chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clauses, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 3. Corrections. The City Clerk and the codifiers of this ordinance are authorized to Ordinance No. 16- Page 9 of 10 Rev 1/15 make necessary corrections to this ordinance including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener/clerical errors, references, ordinance numbering, section/subsection numbers and any references thereto Section 4. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Federal Way this 19'h day of January, 2016. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY . MAYOR, JIM FERRELL ATTEST: CITY CLERK, STEPHANIE COURTNEY, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY, AMY JO PEARSALL FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Ordinance No. 16- Page 10 of 10 Rev 1/15 City of Federal Way Draft Supplemental EIS Figure 1: Planned Action Area Map Date: September 2015 City of Federal Way GI Division 33325 80i Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 22J3-835-7000 .cityo(federalwa y. com �!`=4�jp� T • '7� F i R a! ' �r •F. �, Vdlh.a4r A r*'1a 0 -e L Hillside �"'�I• • N4 _- • ,MF. ,# o-,�y , r� F rw . ..n . Plaza �A �• . A I <11 44F$ ".1, '� '�yf+. >. 1 • • ^ . Trafl5�t� � y a" ' _xR . H"1y 5. }•rurnarl Center oil a r - .. Se.Tac Phan L'Sr_ •f . U •. Ullaga fll LS-320th St —A .�• _ ie;'-�^_T —w_ ,-, i Gnftntrtntran• . 1 r s f—y 1 Canter ��� it ,, r. �� is �-- ,� 4_�?� _ • t,w • .. Imo, . QI�7P.3{lb7i f,7ljL•; �.I_ • 1 MA j li^ — Legend Planned Action SEPAArea ,L3' Gateway / k Gen<er The Commons Federal -Way City Center Element AlkCITY 6F Federal Way This map is intended for use Scale: as a graphical representation. 0 500 1,000 The City of Federal Way makes R:\eriketcd\Projects\Planned Action Area0raftSupplementalEIS.mxd Feet no warranty as to its accuracy. Exhibit B Planned Action Mitigation Document The City of Federal Way issued the 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on October 16, 2015, and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on December XX, 2015. The Draft and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements are referenced collectively herein as the "SEIS". The SEIS has identified probable, significant impacts that would occur with the future development of the Planned Action area, together with a number of potential measures to mitigate those significant impacts. The purpose of this Mitigation Document is to establish specific mitigation measures, based upon significant impacts identified in the SEIS. The mitigation measures would apply to future development proposals which are consistent with the Planned Action development envelope reviewed in the SEIS, and which are located within the Planned Action area (see Exhibit A). USE OF TERMS The Planned Action area may be referred to as the City Center Planned Action area, project site, or project area in this document. General Interpretation Where a mitigation measure includes the words "shall" or "will," inclusion of that measure is mandatory. Where "should" or "would" appear, the mitigation measure may be considered by the project applicant as a source of additional mitigation. Unless stated specifically otherwise, the mitigation measures that require preparation of plans, conduct of studies, construction of improvements, conduct of maintenance activities, etc., are the responsibility of the applicant or designee. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER THE PLANNED ACTION The proposal reviewed in the SEIS includes designation of a portion of the City Center as a Planned Action area for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation applies to construction of proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development falling within the development envelope and project area analyzed in the SEIS, as summarized below. Planned Action Develonment F.nvelnne Uses Development Envelope Retail 475,000 sf Office 400,000 sf Lodging 600 rooms Residential 2,400 units The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Vehicle trip generation --the trip generation alternatives reviewed in the SEIS are as follows: Trip Generation by Alternative 2025 No Action 2025 Action Alternative Alternative Time Period Total Trips Total Trips AM Peak Hour 3,040 3,617 PM Peak Hour 6,919 6,792 MITIGATION Based on the SEIS, which is incorporated by reference, this Mitigation Document summarizes significant adverse environmental impacts that are anticipated to occur in conjunction with the development of Planned Action projects. Mitigation measures, identified in the SEIS, are listed here for use in conjunction with proposed projects to mitigate related impacts and to qualify as Planned Action projects. Consistency review under the Planned Action and other permit approvals will be required for specific development actions under the Proposed Action pursuant to WAC 197-11-172 and FWRC 14.15.060. Additional project conditions may be imposed on Planned Action projects based upon the analysis of the proposal in relationship to independent requirements of the City, state or federal requirements or review criteria. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Chapter 3 of the Draft SEIS identifies significant impacts, unavoidable adverse impacts and mitigation measures for potential impacts associated with air quality, land use, aesthetics, light and glare, transportation, public services and utilities. Please refer to the Draft and Final SEIS for complete text associated with each element of the environment. The following is a summary of the mitigation measures applicable to impacts on each element of the environment identified in the SEIS. Air Quality Mitigation Measures ■ Construction activities related to development approved under the Planned Action Designation could generate fugitive dust, which could be mitigated using the following,b, s% management practices: ,- o Use wk.er sprays or other non -toxic dust con,.O'l methods on unpaved roadways. o Minimize vehicle speed while traveling on unpaved surfaces. o Prevent track -out of mud onto public streets. o Cover soil piles when practical. o To the extent practical, minimize work during periods of high winds. • Burning of slash or demolition debris is not permitted without express approval from PSCAA. No slash burning is anticipated for any construction projects in the City Center. ■ Mobile construction equipment and portable stationary engines would emit air pollutants including NOx, CO, and PM10. These emissions would be temporary and localized. It is highly unlikely that the temporary emissions would cause ambient concentrations at adjoining parcels to approach the NAAQS limits. Typical mitigation measures to minimize air quality and odor issues caused by tailpipe emissions include the following: o Maintain the engines of construction equipment according to manufacturers' specifications. o Minimize idling of equipment while the equipment is not in use. Land Use Mitigation Measures ■ Existing development standards along the edges of the Planned Action area appear to be adequate to allow for a compatible transition from more intensive to less intensive uses. However, as development occurs, this transition area should be evaluated to confirm that long-term land use compatibility impacts are not being created. If necessary, new development standards for edge areas should be considered. Techniques could include site and building lighting limits, requirements for landscaping, noise control, and other measures. Aesthetics, Light and Glare Mitigation Measures • Continued use of the City's Community Design Guidelines and review/approval process to monitor and mitigate potential impacts associated with light and glare, shadows, and aesthetic impacts resulting from new development, including structured parking. • Increased building height for multi -unit structures in the City Center Core zone would be permitted only with review through the City's design review and public benefits review processes, as set forth in the Community Design Guidelines. • Monitor shade conditions as development occurs and amend the City's Community Design Guidelines to require site -specific shadow analysis in public places as needed. Transportation Mitigation Measures This section summarizes the proposed mitigation anticipated to be required beyond the roadway improvements assumed to be constructed by 2025. Existing Roadway Network Both the No Action and P 'on Alternatives would increase the der y and activity within the Federal Way Cny Center area. The increased density coulu increase traffic congestion; however, these increases may be offset by reduced vehicle travel demand resulting from mixed -use development, improvements to pedestrian facilities, and improved transit services. Based on the level of service (LOS) analysis, no additional roadway capacity improvements are needed. Parking Additional parking spaces will be required on site for both the No Action and Action Alternatives. These spaces may be provided on the site or as part of parking garages assumed as part of the City Center development. The number of parking spaces required could be reduced through shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management programs. This reduction could vary from 10 percent to 20 percent based on the effectiveness and robustness of the programs implemented. Additional Mitigation The mitigation identified in this section is focused on additional improvements that could be required to meet the expected travel demand on area roadways associated with the proposed development in the project area. Development will need to meet the requirements of applicable codes at the time of application. Such requirements might include the dedication of right-of-way; installing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; drainage improvements; and other requirements of the City. Additional mitigation may be required for individual development applications within the project area to reduce area traffic impacts, or improve on -site circulation and to meet City and State requirements for Commute Trip Reduction and Transportation Demand Management. Actions to be considered include: On -Site Improvements — Driveway and circulation action/improvements to minimize impact on area roadways. Actions may include management of access points, traffic control measures, construction of internal roadways, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, and connections to adjacent developments. Non -Motorized Mode Improvements — Mitigation may be required per site specific and land use development proposals to address pedestrian, bicycle, and transit improvements to support the plans, policies, and goals as noted within the City's comprehensive plan transportation element. Grid Roadway Development — Part of the City Center Plan is to develop a number of internal roadways to create smaller blocks that will improve the grid network and improve the access for pedestrians and vehicles. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements shall be a component of the development submittal phase of a proposed project within the project area. Roadways within the project area must meet specific "City Center" design standards as specified in the City's comprehensive plan transportation element. Right -of -Way Dedication — Right-of-way dedication and frontage improvements may be required in conjunction with proposed developments. Roadways within the project area must meet specific "City Center" design standards as specified in the City's comprehensive plan transportation element. Transportation Dem-tid Management (TDM) - TDM actioriz!, can be used to reduce the impact of the project and as a mitigation action. These actions may include provision of transit passes to tenants and employees, ridesharing programs, priority carpool parking, and guaranteed ride home programs. TDM actions are designed to primarily address commute trips and may not be applicable as mitigation for all developments. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan summarizes TDM alternatives by their functional grouping and potential effectiveness, implementation difficulties,, and expected cost effectiveness. These strategies include: Telecommuting; Parking Management and Pricing; Flexible Work Schedule; Rideshare programs; Traveler Information; Public Relations; and Marketing. Following is a list of recommended mitigation measures that can be considered in conjunction with individual development projects within the project area: 1. Encourage voluntary expansion of the CTR Program to employers of less than 100 employees. The encouragement by employers may be as diverse as subsidized bus passes, car pool space priority, bike racks, shower facilities, van pools, car pool information access, telecommuting, variable work hours, etc. 2. Encourage the formation and expansion of area -wide ride -sharing programs. Such programs operate with little direct cost to the City and are highly cost effective. 3. Support the enhancement of Park and Ride facilities and transit centers to supplement the regional system, either directly through physical development or enhancements, or indirectly through development conditions where employer vans are required to shuttle employees to Park and Ride facilities or transit centers. 4. Facilitate enhancements to the HOV system. This may include the dedication of property for HOV lanes, construction of arterial HOV lanes within existing City right-of-way, and priority treatments for buses at traffic signals. At the very least, where feasible, opportunities to enhance access to the state system of HOV lanes should be considered. 5. Achieve increased densities and mix of uses to support public transportation, decrease trip generation and parking impacts. 6. Encourage facilities (shelters, loading spaces, etc.) to accommodate City Center shuttle service in association with development projects, together with enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access and security. 7. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access to bus routes and transit centers. This can be a requirement of subdivision, development, and redevelopment. The City may need to acquire easements and construct trail connections. Development incentives could be granted for providing such amenities that are pedestrian, bike, and transit friendly. While bicycle, pedestrian, and bus transit services and facilities may be desirable for other reasons; they should not be looked on as highly cost-effective strategies to the exclusion of those actions listed above. Neighborhood Traffic Control - Development within the project area may be required to include actions to reduce the impact of cut through traffic on residential areas. Examples of neighborhood traffic control actions include: turn restrictions, speed controls, traffic enforcement, and parking restrictions. ParkinIZ - Mitigation actions that reduce the parking requirements within the project area should be encourage' -xamples include shared parking, empl �e parking programs, parking time restrictions, and paid parking programs. Shared parking strategies focus on looking at opportunities where adjacent uses have parking demand profiles that can support the sharing of a smaller amount of parking spaces. For example, an office building with an 8 am to 5 pm demand could share its parking with evening dominated uses such as restaurants or a cinema. A parking demand study, which shows the hourly parking demand profiles for adjacent uses and the potential for joint parking opportunities within a mixed -use development, can be used to reduce the number of parking spaces. In addition, contained in the above TDM mitigation are strategies that overlap with parking mitigation plans for development. A development may propose a plan and management system to the City for approval upon submittal of the development permit. Those items may contain the following in support of the City of Federal Way and state Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) requirements: Alternative Mode Support Measures Public education and promotion may increase the effectiveness of these other strategies up to three percent. Area -Wide Ride Matching Services — May result in a 0.1-3.6% reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and an up to 2.5% VMT reduction in transit services. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Vanpool Service — May result in an up to 8.3% in commute VMT, as well as a reduction in transit and vanpool fares up to 2.5%. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Non -Motorized Modes Plan and Implementation — May result in an up to 0-2% regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. HOV Facilities — May result in an up to 1.5% VMT reduction and 0.2% vehicle trip reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. On Site Development of Park and Ride Program — May result in up to 0-0.5% VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Employer -Based TDM Measures Parking Mitigation -- Monetary incentives may result in an up to 8-18% trip reduction at site. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Alternative Work Schedules — May result in as much as a 1 % regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip generation rates. Commute Support P-ograms - May result in up to 0.1-2.0%%-- Tonal VMT reduction. Reductions in parkin6 .;quired may be calculated on the basis _ these lower trip generation rates. Parking Management - May result in up to a 20 to 30% reduction in SOV trips to/from the site. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Telecommuting - Up to 10% commute VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Other Strategies Parking Tax - May result in up to a 1 to 5% reduction in regional VMT and trip generation, but requires City Council and/or legislative action. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Development Parking Impact Mitigation - Requires City Council approval to allow for payment of parking -mitigation funds towards long term investments in structured parking solutions in lieu of full parking requirement. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Mixed Land Use/Jobs Housing Balance - May result in VMT reductions up to 10%. Parking stall credit is given based on overlapping shared usage of mixed facility, per City code provisions. Transit -Oriented and Pedestrian -Friendly Design - Site and building design that encourages transit usage and/or walking may reduce overall parking requirement. Requires design review and staff approval. Employment Center Density - Achievement of sufficient density within the City Center to constitute a regional employment center may reduce SOV work trips to individual development projects by up to 50%. Parking stall reductions may also apply to developments. Other Parking Management Plans - May mitigate 1 to 5% region -wide VMT, provided enforcement issues are addressed in the mitigation plan. Traffic Impact Fee Under 2006 EIS Addendum #3 (November 2010), the traffic impact fee (TIF) program (adopted by Council under Ordinance 09-627 and codified into code under FWRC 19.91), was to replace the established pro-rata mitigation fee per PM vehicle trip identified in Exhibit B to Ordinance 07-547, the Planned Action adoption ordinance. Development within the Planned Action area will be required to pay the required traffic impact fee as prescribed in FWRC 19.91 and the adopted City fee schedule. This practice complies with the state's Growth Management Act (GMA) intent that new growth would pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve the new growth, and also mitigate the adverse impact of future development within the PlnnnPrl Action nren ThP trnffir. imnnct fee k iollPnted nnrl cnPnt for .wRtem improvements included w'- -'n the list of transportation capital facil= -s in the City's comprehensive plan transportation element. Public Services Mitigation Measures Impacts to public services from development under the Planned Action designation would not be significant. However, measures can be taken to prevent or further minimize environmental consequences to public services. Recommended mitigating measures include: • Coordinate with Police and South King Fire & Rescue during final design, construction, and operation of future development to ensure that reliable emergency access is maintained. • Coordinate with the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department to identify opportunities for increased recreational open space for general public use throughout the project area, and within new development proposals. • Reduce public safety impacts through adherence to crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) design standards. • Provide emergency service providers with advanced notice of construction schedules and any planned street closures or blockages. • Avoid or minimize street closures or blockages during construction to avoid impact to emergency response times. Utilities Mitigation Measures Water and Sanitary Sewer Service ■ Ensure that all new development complies with local, state and federal standards for energy conservation. • Encourage drought -tolerant landscaping (xeriscaping) for new development. • Encourage new development to incorporate appropriate water conservation measures into their operations. Utilities • Plan with service providers to minimize impacts of utility relocations (equipment procurement times, relocate in advance of construction, etc.). • Inform utility customers of any planned temporary service disruptions. ■ Coordinate with all utility companies on the design of the new services and connections. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 2016 CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIS PUBLIC MEETING NOVEMBERIR, 2015 Sign -In Sheet NAME MAILING ADDRESS EMAIL C-- 14c""Q". .6 49��k- jtj4y- Vermaay.'WIA N 31919 Is' Ave S, SuitR101Fe 9 .003 253.925.5565 1 253.925.5750 (f) Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained by the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way - Community Development as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 16th day of October 2015, and ending on the 16th day of October 2015 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 1$ 64.39, which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.020. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 12th day of November 2015. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Buckley ,tk%111,11+1,, r NOTARY I! cn :, PUBLIC �''�, OF r1NASt'',�%% [321 October 16,2015 www.federalwaymirror.com wwwsoundclassitiieds.com LEGAL NOTICES Dogs Garage/Moving Sales Auto Events/ Automobtlee Auto Servce /Parts/ General Auctions & Couteti tiles Atlas Ir AUCTION NOTICE GAARRAGEIOFFiCE Corr- AUCTION NOTICE In compliance with RCW 46.5.130 Express Towing solidenonsale: Many of- inppmplaXcav0 Cash LLC will sell to the highest bidder at 35000 Pacific Rce equipment and sup- RCw4e.55.130 Highway S. in Fedesai Way, WA art Tuesday, Octo- ply Items Inducting color State of Washington ber20, 2015at3 p.m. Yiewin at 2 rrl. u let printer, hole ABTTOWING JUNK CARS & g P apvrxhes, coiling uoard, of Federal Way, will TRUCKS Published in Federal Way Mirror October 16, 2015 f harrga9 fit es ate. Afro a sell to highest bidder. FWM 2282 ggood eescrlmenl of Hal• Wednesda , GOLOILOCKS' ENJOY Free Pick up foween Ceslumesldeco• Wednesday, DRIVtNR this head turn - rations. Christmas deco• 10/2112015 Or classic 1974 VW Su- 253-335-3932 Dogs _ rations. decorative gill Viewing noon. per4eetle! Nice through- o<.s boxes and baskets. Auction 1 pm. out. -two tone bronze / r._ Have boat bumpers, 3312515r^ Ave S. gold, sport wheels, elec- campground & RV F i'a1 Way J- B AMERICAN AKITA knell board, wake board Federal Way 98003 fvoei a ignition, bpgredad Memberships �.� - Puppies; four male and and Ilia ackels- TEAC system, stored AM / October16,2015 lourpfemala, barn 9V13. starea jwitn 2 JVC 47VEHICLES' FM tape deck, good me- PRIVATE Camp Ground Re:2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supple- National Champpion speakers: Stair Master chanical and interior. 30 Membarshlp at KW Re - mental Environmental Impact 5tatement (SEIS) (Bess in Show)/ Cf am• SATIIRDAY Oclober 17 year ownership by fussy sorts of Amer4a with 8 The City of Federal Way Inv* y0o t0 Oomment on -� pions en Win sides of ONLY from 7:30am 10 old mechanical engi- [Yale campgrounds in the 2016 Clly Center Planned Action Draft Supple- pedigrees. $1.500 4:00pm: 1131 S 276th • • neer. Detailed records WA State. Featuring hlk- mental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). (spay/flouter).sloo non- PLDes Moines 1 available. $5,950. Red- ing, btlting, fishing, In - mental ( 6 BEAUTIFUL BABY refundable dep to hold • mond.425-947-7907. dam & outdoor pools f The Draft SEES Includes in update to the ttartspar. BOXERS $500 each. yp W pick of the titter for [larearaJerr,tt Calm Thursd October much more! Ahliflated 100n aflalysls for the City Garner Planned Action purebred males/femalee. ThanksgvirgrChrlsVnas 22 '1pm Automowles with RPI International, subarea. The EIS being supplemented is the City of The but loving pup*W Ready t0 ga on 11113. others and Coast to COWL Age Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Envi Parents on site. Puppy Pctures d pupppies will Seth Holiday Arm and Is forcing sale. Prided to ronmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued in 2006. shots, wormed, sails he updalad weekly.263- Crafts Fair. Join us on •i+, AUTO INSURANCE sell with huge to p ( ) cropped and dewclaws 927-038'3. Saturday November STARTING AT $25/ you at only 51�50. SAtI• Subsequently four Addenda to the 2006 EIS have removed. Located in 7th gain to 4pm, Arts Preview at noon MONTHI Call 877-929- or pa trasfer fsa- Call been issued. A Planned Action Ordinance was Soap lake, but will meet Find your perfect pet and Crafts by North- 1220 So. 343"Street 9397 ZD �• adopted in 2007. halfway for doll"ry, Da- in the Classifieds. west Artisans. Jewelry, Federal Way, 98003 posits being accepted. rX�a•souiMClass'rffeds.com Quills, Woodworking You could save over Addendum 4 to the 2006 EIS extended the end 508 4ro-t04o.PhoiOsai and more. Rome, La www.kenttowing.com $son off your auto reu- timeframe of development for which the Planned wwabozerbabies.weebly.com $ssggno, Soup and sal- ranee. It only takes a Action Ordinance applies from 2014 to September ad�- T l am to 2pm whetherN &M few minutes. Save 10% Nenw 30, 2015, gThe Planned Action designation mail Homemade, Desserts. buying or selling, by adding property to cqs� further environmerilal review on development with- 9am to Spin. Federal the Classifieds quote. Call Nowl 1-888- in the designated Planned Action area is not neces- Way United Melhodisl has it all. From sat if the proposed development is consistent Church, 29645 5191 au omob let and Y P P P Avenue South, Au- employment to real Mlscellaneous Autos with the development levels of the adopted s X; burn, WA 253•939- estate and household selling in the Planned Action Ordinance. �,.r.•: 132za g The planned action project area is located in the AKC standard Poodia AKC Beailttlul Wstie goods, you'll find ABANDONED City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, Puppies. Blacks, puppies' Accepting Saba everything you need VEHICLE classifieds Browns. & Red Cream g deposits now, MorrvDad - 24 hours a day at bounded on the north by South 312th Street, on Apricot. Males & Fe- on sno and up to date on }' www.soundaass aedscom AUCTION is easy ilia south by South 324UI Street, an the west by males. Parents genets- shola. Very loving loyal .., - Special Interest call US today! Pacific Highway South, afld On the east primarily tally testad, good 9ne¢, bread• Great family pet swrxkiouwahXnew Towing y by 23rd Avenue South. Addltional Srea Is located great temperament_ 2 Pups come with 1" .. Xea z592370th Ave S. east of 23rd Avenue South, bordered on the north yea' health guarantee a shots, dewormed & AKC wlXrd■+ewYion KenkWA 98032 up to data do shots. We papers. Health garumee. - �r 5.- tenon waysw Eve Tuesda 1 1 by South 317th Street and on the south by South �shiy Pups are ready Qc;otdr � Every y 319th Place, oadw.com 231,S VOID- Details caU v� wo laomms at 11 AM , I • I l The proposed action specifically consists of the a BD2i Tami: 360-480.3345, t 1 1 , ,per, Viewing at 10 AM following: Onalaska. a �7s7-0e4s (253) 854-7240 Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environ- mentalService Policy Act and compliance, pursuant e recto RCW 43Action de and ion old ap-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to pro- - posed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development enve- ry - lope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action x designation would apply to development that s oc- cursrrora�arIcos Hamer s i H� Services nce �rvr�ee Home S.-I.—Her.Xeservices through the end of year l Legal services Harr MA & aronnup Houses/crean i g semoe LaHendscape services Ramos, mg rta„/shruh CareAlternative 1, the 2025 Actioonn Alernative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Cen- DIVORCE $155. $175 AA SHEER ter subarea in accordance with the amounts listed with children. No court PERSONALIZED FOR GARDENING & C'* appearances. Complete YOUR HOMEIOFFICE LANDSCAPING In the Planned Action Area development envelope. preparation. Includes Junk Removal Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, in- custody, support, prop- We Haul Anything! Cleaning Weekly ' Cleanup -Trim • Weed etudes an Increase in land use In The City Center ckeitr arty l� division and bills. HOME, GARAGE and Bi-Weekly' Monthly PBark rune ' Stop Seed subarea assuming the level of growth established BW member. (503)772- YARD CLEANUP Excellent Boston References BaGdlce-Paties 5215. www.pare,"gafar- Lowest Rates! Seattle Shore Cleaning 425-226-3911 €nthe FederalWay Comprehensive Plan, lernarves-corn raga- Call Sonia 206722-2043 Free Estimates Environmental issues evaluated in this Draft SEIS lalt®msn.com (253)310-3265 41CallSoni75 LKXA,sHEc 22- inrJude air quality, land use, aesthetics. transpOrta• Home Services 253 854 6049 Hon, public services (police, firaMS, parks and General contractors Home services anvwSo�.can K & K 425-417-2444 recreatWiti, and utfllfes;water, sewer, eTectriclty, Property Maintenance rindwhattooneedsi24 hours:Xrr Landscaping in Additions& RemmRK mppng, Ffq- natural W. and telecdmmunlpilans). a Rehtodelin aursdard corded Lam Malrnenance gg PuhIEC and agency comment is Invited regarding All Things nB,a,,seman;y' Home services Trimirdng, Pruning, PerSorinl Oesgn Basement Systems Inc. Kitchen and Bath Weed' comioultanl The proposed action and afternatly& The docu- 1 Cali us for all of our aXg, Ckien-up EoperICarpentry; ments are posted on the City's website at !M-ARemodet hasemrenlneedsl Water- Bark. Hauling Drywall.Ponlog, 1Amw,ci.federal-wa wa.us/ 'Cmpenhy-PaislirXg An kinds of yardwvne y 'Fhonng•Wntiom proofing, Finishing, } Decks,Fenees.Roofs, mdex.aspx?NID=503. poo,s•cocs Struclurat Repairs, Hu- 253-862-4347 ALL REPAIRS, Duality, TreeTrlmming CD copies may be purchased for $10.00 at the Mweectica?rdWell and Mold Control Licensed &Insured AfloreigNoSarvless &Pruning. LicrVOLDWR1 g27BW Medium War Removal. Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 8th "rkodFencas FR E ESTIMATES! Jn/ceorDux Stump Grinceng. Avenue South, Federal Way. ' Frosasraw2gllYlg Call 1-800-998-5574 i • 20&878-a9El A�yARD WORT[ Comments are due no later than November 16, R°0f GfWd!°fXea�Vp Home services r """°°""°'"" d °°" ANOtAAtiD Pi S 2015, and should be addressed to: Hv mrner^a Help 61-LYARD WORK Stacey Welsh, AICP, Senior Planner AND AN APIN - Home 5orvtrecSalislaction Guaranteed City of Federal Way LOWEST Community Development Department "One Call All BATH & KITCHEN Free Estima es S�� wn maxima for ROOFING & Senior Discount 33325 8th Avenue South Does It All!' Improvements from 1st Time Glskme s P REMODELING Li Federal Way, ci 98003 6325 • Decks *Doors design-to-finish specialize i in Na all Full Cleanup Senior Discounts • '' " stacey.welsh®cityoffederalway.com •Decks 'Fences� • A public meeting will be held to receive comment ' Drywall and Repairs cabinets, floors, coup- Free Estimates P 9 Mowing. Thalchkrg 8 ' Custom rue Work ter[aps. including all Expert Work Reach over a million regarding the proposal on: ble weeding November 9, 2015 ! r . -Bond d - Insured marore wacrrheny Rommel 253-e5 61 5 potential customers 4:30-6:30 p.m. 2llCA2T6g49 Lc# WILDWRL927BW outlet & Roof when you advertise in Cleaning Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers Home servtnpe Call Joyce or Dick AND MUCH MORE. `� u�XAMEmGCaa3es the Service Directory. 33325 8th Avenue South Hand Additions & 206-878-3964 Cal80Da88-25z7 or Remodeling. wXh*.atarr a.eur.rom Cheat uJ l Online Advertise your www.souiygass;neds.com Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Personal Design w1Xw,lallwawn upcoming gars Your interest in the Cityof Federal Way is read PUGETSOUNO andgardencpm gesale Y greatly Consultant FORTHEHOUC ETS Domestic vice 01as CONSTRUCTION n our local community appreciated. If you would like more information Interior/Exterior Expan 4:1iuy, FOR THEHOLfDAY5 y b Householdservrceoiihee about this proposal, please contact Stacey Welsh pad and Dryvrau, Painung: newspaper and online Decks, Fences, Roofs, We refinish, reface, or • A PLACE FOR MOM. at 253-835 2634, or Hams rs i to reach thousands of The nation's la �¢pD AN re sus. eua'c4e replace al elsen- afacey.welsh®ctyoffederalWay.com. Build AflorruableServices Granteor0uatz households in your area krAv&lo referral service Published in the Federal Way Mirror Friday, Octo- and Fences Lic#WILDWRL927BW Courter4savalable. Go online to Conrad our (rusted, to- DryRol Joyce Free cal experts today! Our bar 16, 2015 y a 1rwllr.SamdClassfieds can FWM 2283 2 5 3 - 3 5 0 - 3 2 31 20rra78 a964 se vice is FREE7nd oWl- Kathi 253.72a3356 i • r • r XPUGEfGC03eKA wltdwoomemoaamalk.com traaAmw,aaoo Call:1-800388-2527 2900n. CALL 1.E00-717- -- c... e� � tea..,. 2905 41kCITY OF 401;:t�� Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.ciiy+ofederalway.corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 7 j1 I, r-✓D9 ✓'3 hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ® Other /Vo+ic e-- p-(� ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document no4t c-e— was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ® posted to or at each of the attached addresses on Project Name�Gt File Number(s) /:fD �0l �� D - 56, Signature Date /6//fZ—/ K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 St Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street Subject Site - N 10 K:\PLANNING INTERN\Declaration of Distribution notices\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc 2�h Mni--,y October 16, 2015 Re: 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) The City of Federal Way invites you to comment on the 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). The Draft SEIS includes an update to the transportation analysis for the City Center Planned Action subarea. The EIS being supplemented is the City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued in 2006. Subsequently four Addenda to the 2006 EIS have been issued. A Planned Action Ordinance was adopted in 2007. Addendum #4 to the 2006 EIS extended the end timeframe of development for which the Planned Action Ordinance applies from 2014 to September 30, 2015. The Planned Action designation means further environmental review on development within the designated Planned Action area is not necessary if the proposed development is consistent with the development levels of the adopted Planned Action Ordinance. The planned action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312dh Street, on the south by South 3241h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 231d Avenue South. Additional area is located east of'23,d Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317d' Street and on the south by South 319th Place. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Environmental issues evaluated in this Draft SEIS include air quality, land use, aesthetics, transportation, public services (police, fire/EMS, parks and "recreation), and utilities (water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications). Public and agency comment is invited regarding the proposed action and alternative. The documents are posted on the City's website athttp:I/www.ci.federal-way.3ya.uslindex.aspx?NID7 -503. CD copies may be purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall.Permit Center, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way. Comments are due no later than November 16, 2015, and should be addressed to: Stacey Welsh, AICP, Senior Planner City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 stacey.,,velsh@city-offederaINv,,iv.com A public meeting will be held to receive comment regarding the proposal on: November 9, 2015 4:30-6:30 p.m. Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stacey.welsh [r,cit,toffederalw-ay.com. CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, t' hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, tha a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Other was Kmailed ❑ faxed e-maile 1d and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 201,5. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date _m ` lk- :� Io K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distdbution.doc/Last printed 8/18/2015 9:45:00 AM ec: C51 2C -t h�rer.nrr' October 16, 2015 Re: 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) The City of Federal Way invites you to comment on the 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). The Draft SEIS includes an update to the transportation analysis for the City Center Planned Action subarea. The EIS being supplemented is the GO of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued in 2006. Subsequently four Addenda to the 2006 EIS have been issued. A Planned Action Ordinance was adopted in 2007. Addendum #4 to the 2006 EIS extended the end timeframe of development for which the Planned Action Ordinance applies from 2014 to September 30, 2015. The Planned Action designation means further environmental review on development within the designated Planned Action area is not necessary if the proposed development is consistent with the development levels of the adopted Planned Action Ordinance. The planned action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312th Street, on the south by South 324d, Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23,d Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23rd Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317th Street and on the south by South 319th Place. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental PolicyAct (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Environmental issues evaluated in this Draft SEIS include air quality, land use, aesthetics, transportation, public services (police, fire/EMS, parks and recreation), and utilities (water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications). Public and agency comment is invited regarding the proposed action and alternative. The documents are posted on the City's website at 1iup.-//Mvw•_ri.I1)=503. CD copies maybe purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 81h Avenue South, Federal Way. Comments are due no later than November 16, 2015, and should be addressed to: Stacey Welsh, AICP, Senior Planner City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 staccy.wc:lsh @ cityciffederahvay.com A public meeting will be held to receive comment regarding the proposal on: November 9, 2015 4:30-6:30 p.m. Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stacel.�velsl� t cstyoffedcta[�vat°•cntt�. Sincerely, Michael A. Morales Community Development Director a Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner Tina Piety From. Tina Piety Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:23 PM To: 'ksnyder@ci.auburn.wa.us'; 'planning@kentwa.gov'; dlathrop@desmoineswa.gov; cityhall@cityofedgewood.org; Brian Wilson; Tim Johnson; Marwan Salloum; sfriddle@cityoffife.org; 'planning@cityofalgona.com'; clarson@cityofmilton.net; jdodge@ci.pacific.wa.us;'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; epa-seattle@epa.gov; 'tnascime@fwps.org'; harold.taniguchi@kingcounty.gov; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; eharris@psrc.org; perry.weinberg@soundtransit.org; Chris Ingham; gretchen.kaehler@dahp.wa.gov; 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov); wfwoctap@fws.gov; 'ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov'; karen.walter@muckleshoot.nsn.us; laura.murphy@muckleshoot.nsn.us; brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com; dlewarch@suquamish.nsn.us; basbury@lakehaven.org Cc: Michael Morales; Isaac Conlen; Stacey Welsh Subject: Federal Way 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Attachments: Appendix 1.pdf; Cover Letter.pdf; Draft SEIS.pdf Hello, Attached you will find three documents related to the City of Federal Way's 2016 Planned ActioP Draft'SPIS (cover',letter, Draft SEIS, Appendix 1). Appendix 2 will be sent in a separate email. The documents may also be found on the city's website at the following link: http://www.citvoffederalway.com/index.aspx?nid=503. WA DOE, I have also mailed you a hard copy per your instructions. If you have any questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, at Stacey.welsh@cityoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2634. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityoffede ra Iway-cam Tina Piety From: Tina Piety Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:26 PM To: 'ksnyder@ci.auburn.wa.us'; 'planning@kentwa.gov'; 'dlath rop@desmoineswa.gov; 'cityhall@cityofedgewood.org'; Brian Wilson; Tim Johnson; Marwan Salloum; 'sfriddle@cityoffife.org'; 'plan ning@cityofalgona.com'; 'clarson@cityofmilton.net; Idodge@ci.pacific.wa.us'; 'shirley.schultz@ci.tacoma.wa.us'; 'epa-seattle@epa.gov'; 'tnascime@fwps.org;'harold.taniguchi@kingcounty.gov'; 'sepa@pscleanair.org'; 'eharris@psrc.org'; 'perry.weinberg@soundtransit.org'; Chris Ingham; 'gretchen.kaehier@dahp.wa.gov'; 'reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov'; 'ECY RE SEPA REGISTER (separegister@ecy.wa.gov)'; 'wfwoctap@fws.gov'; 'ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov'; 'karen.wafter@muckleshoot.nsn.us'; 'laura.murphy@muckfeshoot.nsn.us';'brandon.reynon@puyalluptribe.com'; 'diewarch@suquamish.nsn.us'; 'basbury@lakehaven.org' Cc: Michael Morales; Isaac Conlen; Stacey Welsh Subject: Federal Way 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Attachments: Appendix 2.pdf Hello, Per my first email, attached you will find Appendix 2 of the City of Federal Way's 2016 Planned Action Draft SEIS. As stated in my first email, the documents may also be found on the city's website at the following, link: http://www.citvoffederalwa.y.com/index.aspx?nid=503. If you have any questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, at Stacey.welsh@citvoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2634. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II - Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 Bch Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 w ww. c i tyofFe d e c a l way. co m Tina Piety From: Ben Han <bhan@piercetransit.org> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:34 PM To: Tina Piety Subject: Automatic reply: Federal Way 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Hello, I am no longer with Pierce Transit. If you need any operational -related or general questions with bus stops, please contract Peter Stackpole, Service Planning Asst Manager, at 253-581-8131. If you have any construction or design -related questions, please contact Monica Adams, Senior Planner, at 253-581-8130. Thanks! -Ben Tina Piety From: Tina Piety Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 9:22 AM To: 'tvaslet@piercetransit.org' Subject: Federal Way 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Attachments: Appendix 1.pdf; Cover Letter.pdf; Draft SEIS.pdf Hello, Attached you will find three documents related to the City of Federal Way's 2016 Planned Action Draft SEIS (cover letter, Draft SEIS, Appendix 1). Appendix 2 will be sent in a separate email. The documents may also be found on the city's website at the following link: http://www.citvoffederalway.com/index.aspx?nid=503. If you have any questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, at Stacey.welsh@citvoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2634. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant 11 Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com Tina Piety From: Tina Piety Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 9:23 AM To: tvaslet@piercetransit.org Subject: Federal Way 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Attachments: Appendix 2.pdf Hello, Per my first email, attached you will find Appendix 2 of the City of Federal Way's 2016 Planned Action Draft SEIS. As stated in my first email, the documents may also be found on the city's website at the following link: http;//www.citvoffederalway.com/index.a!;Px?nid=503. If you have any questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP, at Stacey.welsh@citvoffederalway.com, or 253-835-2634. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cityoffede ra lway.corn 41k FederalOF Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www 6fyoffederalway,corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, 1 I,•r; i-CJ:-/ hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation 0 Other was � mailed ❑ Faxed c-,- /C 2015. Project Name File Number(s) ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document -Xe- ailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on Signature ' Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/18/2015 9:45:00 AM 'Federal Way 2 th SAk W-�ri October 16, 2015 Re: 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) The City of Federal Way invites you to comment on the 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). The Draft SEIS includes an update to the transportation analysis for the City Center Planned Action subarea. The EIS being supplemented is the City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued in 2006. Subsequently four Addenda to the 2006 EIS have been issued. A Planned Action Ordinance was adopted in 2007. Addendum #4 to the 2006 EIS extended the end timeframe of development for which the Planned Action Ordinance applies from 2014 to September 30, 2015. The Planned Action designation means further environmental review on development within the designated Planned Action area is not necessary if the proposed development is consistent with the development levels of the adopted Planned Action Ordinance. The planned action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312d1 Street, on the south by South 324th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23,dAvenue South. Additional area is located east of 23rd Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317d' Street and on the south by South 319d' Place. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Polig Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Environmental issues evaluated in this Draft SEIS include Or quality, land use, aesthetics, transportation, public services (police, fire/EMS, parks and recreation), and utilities (water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications). Public and agency comment is invited regarding the proposed action and alternative. The documents are posted on the City's website at http://w%vw-ci_federal-way.wa.usjindex.aspx?N1D=503. CD copies may be purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 8,h Avenue South, Federal Way. Comments are due no later than November 16, 2015, and should be addressed to: Stacey Welsh, AICP, Senior Planner City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 811, Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 stacey.wdsli(@cityoffederalw-ay.com A public meeting will be held to receive comment regarding the proposal on: November 9, 2015 4:30-6:30 p.m. ' Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, orstacey.welsh@cityoffederalwav_com. Tina Piety From: Tina Piety Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:33 PM To: info@edc-seaking.org;'matthew.perkins@kingcounty.gov'; 'kevin.kiernan@kingcouty.gov'; maint.roads@kingcounty.gov; gary.kriedt@kingcounty.gov; customer.comments@kingcounty.gov; aclark@co.pierce.wa.us; bziegle@co.pierce.wa.us; bhan@piercetransit.org; 'victor.novelo@centurylink.com'; 'kristina.kyle@pse.com'; editor@fedwaymirror.com; 'newstips@thenewstribune.com'; 'Rebecca Martin'; D Hoffman (dhoffman@mbaks.com); 'Sam Pace'; 'wec@wecprotects.org; H. David Kaplan Cc: Michael Morales; Isaac Conlen; Stacey Welsh Subject: Federal Way 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Attachments: Newspaper Notice.pdf Hello, Attached you will find Notice of the City of Federal Way's 2016 Planned Action Draft SEIS. The project documents may be found on the city's website at the following link: littp:/Iwww.citvoffederalway.com/inciex.asl2x?nid=503. If you have any questions and/or comments, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh, AICP; at State .welsh cit offederalwa .com or 253-835-2634. Thank you, E. Tina Piety Administrative Assistant II Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.cltvoffederalway.com 44k CITY Federal o. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 81" Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, Oct fr>"� �G� ��W hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document ` 7 Other tp- C Y'Ll I` 1� was k mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on Project Name File Number(s) Signature AcMDILt Date 0 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 8/18/2015 9:45:00 AM 0ederal Way EE.. 2 th ri October 16, 2015 Re: 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) The City of Federal Way invites you to comment on the 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). The Draft SEIS includes an update to the transportation analysis for the City Center Planned Action subarea. The EIS being supplemented is the City of Federal Wray City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued in 2006. Subsequently four Addenda to the 2006 EIS have been issued. A Planned Action Ordinance was adopted in 2007. Addendum #4 to the 2006 EIS extended the end timeframe of development for which the Planned Action Ordinance applies from 2014 to September 30, 2015. The Planned Action designation means further environmental review on development within the designated Planned Action area is not necessary if the proposed development is consistent with the development levels of the adopted Planned Action Ordinance. The planned action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312th Street, on the south by South 324d' Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23Ld Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23rd Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317d' Street and on the south by South 319d' Place. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Polig Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Wray Comprebensive Plan. Environmental issues evaluated in this Draft SEIS include air quality, land use, aesthetics, transportation, public services (police, fire/EMS, parks and recreation), and utilities (water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications). Public and agency comment is invited regarding the proposed action and alternative. The documents are posted on the City's website at http://w%,Av.ci.federal-way.wa.uslindex.aspx?NID=503. CD copies may be purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way. Comments are due no later than November 16, 2015, and should be addressed to: Stacey Welsh, AICP, Senior Planner City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 stace .welsh ci 7offederahva ,.com A public meeting will be held to receive comment regarding the proposal on: November 9, 2015 4:30-6:30 p.m. Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or Stacey.,,velsh@r-ityoffederal,,va wom. City of 1600' Parcel Federal Way Notification area gp6 51 U3 fn a > a S 308 ST S 313 ST Fy g S 315 ST ST S 316 ST S 317 ST 0 S 305 PL r V 4 V fn Q Q S 308 ST rn J > 308 CT rn oa N S 310 ST S312ST rn N U) 3316ST S316ST Q = rn () S316PL a LL o N S 318 PL d > 4 N S 320 ST Q � OIL 00 N woke S � > 309 ST 04 rn S Q 310 ST N Q S N 311 ST N N Ci S 312 ST r4 M Cn Q 314 ST 00 N S 315 LN Z J S 316 LN N Cn a- 9s S317ST N S ❑ 319 PL ��vJ �P 4t GAL S 320 ST N N W Ull 'c D CO) rn S 322 ST S 324 ST S 324 ST S 324 PL WINGED FOOT WY SEMINOLE LN 2 S 325 Q ST r a < ME w p $3a7 N o RION WY m m S 327 ST z HILLS aL o S 328 kP LU OLYMPICWY OAK- m ST r MONT �9� ~ ❑ COLONIAL WY CT i ( S 328 PL p tP Q h S 330 Q 41 > O ST S 330 ST N N Q cn z a > S 332 a a `ni m ST S 331 ST rn S 331 LN ¢ Q a Legend King County Tax Parcels Subject Property (a 110d� Notified Properties 10/14/2015 City of Federal Way 33325 81h Ave S. Federal Way Wa. 98003 (206) - 835 - 7000 www.cityoffederalway.com S� N eo S 314 PL S316ST co Q S S 323 ST Scale: `rrY or Federal Way N 0 385 770 Feet 4A I I This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy 1 Easy Peel® Labels � ♦ ®I Bend along line to Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM � � gVERY® 51600 � Use Avery® Template 5160® 1 2501400010 1541800100 1541800260 KIM & LEE PROPERTIES LLC HALL NIKKOA RICHARDSON ELICIAA Attn: KIM EUNKOO 2530 S 317TH ST UNIT 304 2534 S 317TH ST #204 1526 49TH ST NE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TACOMA WA 98422 2501400020 1541800150 1541800490 SANCHEZ RAMON MD RAUGH SIHO (TRUSTEE) BEALS JUSTIN+TJHIN WINA 1832 S 324TH PL UNIT #2 2532 S 317TH ST #207 2520 S 317TH ST #303 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800410 1541800810 1541600540 BIGLEY JOANN EDMISTON KIRK H KIM KYEJUNG 2520 S 317TH ST #102 2504 S 317TH ST #202 1408 BRITTANY LN NE #13203 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 LACEY WA 98516 1541800650 1541801060 1541800840 FUSION BAKER JEFFERY L EDMISTON KIRK+PAMELA PO BOX 23934 2508 S 317TH ST #208 2504 S 317TH ST #202 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800730 1541800160 1541800910 KROL TINA JEON SEONG MIN ROSENCRANTZ ADAM J 2502 S 317TH ST #201 2532 S 317TH ST #208 34617 4TH PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800750 1541800280 1541800180 SCHUBLOM DAVID TIMMONS CHERYL L ZAMBONINO CESAR E+MERCY PO BOX 2402 2534 S 317TH ST #302 2532 S 317TH ST UNIT 306 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800290 1541800680 1541800480 CHELSEA COURT CONDOMINIUM A TADEMA HAROLD J CARLSEN JOSEPH T PO BOX 4508 2952 S 296TH ST 2520 S 317TH ST #302 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800350 1541800700 1541800850 ROBINSON NATHAN A+CHRISTINE U S BANK TRUST N A GARDINER LISA+JAMES D 2524 S 317TH ST #203 13801 WIRELESS WAY 2504 S 317TH ST UNIT 203 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73134 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800450 1541800830 1541801010 AJMAL MUHAMMAD+SOBIA Z MILFORD ANNETTE MANUEL RUEL CUAN CHING+RENA 2520 S 317TH ST #203 2504 S 317TH ST #201 2508 S 317TH ST UNIT 106 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800520 1541800870 1541800300 NIX REBECCA D CARLSON KATHLEEN+CORDON THOMPSON THOMAS C 2522 S 317TH ST #107 2504 S 317TH ST #301 2534 S 317TH ST UNIT 304 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles a peter ; A Repliez a la hachure afin de ; www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 Sens de reveler le reFiard Po u TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' j chargement P- P j 1 Easy Peel Labels p _ � iA, See instruction Sheet J�AVERY 5160 0 i Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 51600 r rT ~; !Feed --aer for Easy Peel Feature! 1541800430 1541800690 1541800890 KOHOUTEK KEVIN A+WHITE JEFF BANK OF AMERICA NA DAY MICHELLE B 2520 S 317TH PL#201 1610 E STANDREWS PL#B150 2504 S 317TH ST UNIT 303 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 SANTAANA CA 92705 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800630 1541800710 1541800020 LIUKKONEN JOANNA ANDERSON PAUL SACLOLO OSMAN L+DENISE ROXA PO BOX 25134 2502 S 317TH ST 2530 S 317TH ST UNIT 103 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800920 1541800720 1541800090 BARTON AUBRIE JOY+DERECK BR MEYER JAMES W+TERESA M ZAMBONINO CESAR E 2506 S 317TH ST #103 2502 S 317TH ST #103 2530 S 317TH ST #303 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541801030 1541800860 1541800210 NORLAND COLLEEN AKEHURST DEAN S CHELSEA COURT CONDOMINIUM A 2508 S 317TH ST #205 2504 S 317TH ST #204 PO BOX 4508 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 1541800010 1541800970 1541800530 GRAY KIMBERLY ROCKWELL JACOB I FRANTZ LESLIE L PO BOX 2285 2506 S 317TH ST #301 2522 S 317TH ST APT 205 AUBURN WA 98071 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800170 1541800110 1541800620 GOODMAN JENNIFER TASEW KIROS GLENN THOMAS R 2532 S 317TH ST #305 17229 32ND AVE S 2512 S 317TH ST #103 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 SEA TAC WA 98188 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800250 1541800130 1541800460 CHING MICHAEL HOO SUN JARDINE CAROL M NAKANO HIDETO 2534 S 317TH ST #203 2532 S 317TH ST UNIT 205 2520 S 317TH ST UNIT 204 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800400 1541800190 1541800200 LIPSETT KRISTAJ HARRISON BRIAN L+ASHLEY M GALANG LUISITO 2524 317TH ST #304 2532 S 317TH ST #307 2532 S 317TH ST #308 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800440 1541800230 1541800220 HAILE TEKIE HERRERAAMANDA C+PHILLIP J+ PURCELL MICHAEL 2520 S 317TH ST #202 2534 S 317TH ST UNIT 201 21237 5TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 DES MOINES WA 98198 1541800570 1541800420 1541800470 WHALEN KATHALEEN M EMERSON MICHA WILMINGTON TRUST N A 2522 S 317TH ST #305 2503 S 317TH ST #103 8950 CYPRESS WATER BLVD FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 COPPELL TX 75019 Etiquettes faciles a peler A Consultez la feuille wwwaverycom Utilisez le aabarit AVERYO 51600 Sens de chamement d'instructinn I.Rnn.rn.nvFRV Easy Peel Labels ' A �� See Instruction Sheet ��@f ©5160� 1 Use Avery TEMPLATE 51600 � ,d Paper �'® for Easy Peel FeatureA 1541800990 1541800040 1541800980 COCHRANE BLONDELL FUSION BAUERANNAM PO BOX 98001 PO BOX 23934 2506 S 317TH ST UNIT 302 DES MOINES WA 98198 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800030 1541800950 1541801000 KONOMOS CHRISTOPHER D STOCK JEFFREY W+LEANNE M PETE JAMES 2530 S 317TH ST #201 33926 9TH AVE S 29815 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800080 1541800070 1541801040 KLASSEN JAMES M WEILER RACHELLE E HATHIRAMANI KISHORE T 2530 S 317TH ST #302 16444 SYLVESTER RD SW 2508 S 317TH ST #206 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BURIEN WA 98166 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800310 1541800880 1541801070 THOMPSON JENNIFER VENTURES TRUST 2013-1-H-R NORTON SHAYNE 2524 S 317TH ST UNIT 102 314 S FRANKLIN ST 2508 S 317TH ST UNIT 305 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TITUSVILLE PA 16354 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800360 1541801020 1541800320 ORNBURN MEGAN LOSTON MICHAEL KOITZSCH KAY 2524 S 317TH ST #204 2907 S 45TH ST 107 SW 171 ST ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TACOMA WA 98409 NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 1541800770 1541800330 1541800590 MCELRATH MARILYN E FONTILEA JANELLE TAYLOR ANTHONY B 2502 S 317TH ST UNIT 301 Attn: 2524 S 317TH ST #201 2522 S 317TH ST #307 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PO BOX 25585 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 1541800780 1541800760 1541800600 NAROD DEVELOPMENT LTD KRIEGER KATIE Y BITTINGER MELONYA 650 GEORGIA ST 2502 S 317TH ST #204 26381 WHITMAN ST #65051 VANCOUVER BC V613 4V4 CANADA 00 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 HAYWARD CA 94544 1541800270 1541801050 1541800960 HOGLUND STEVEN G VANGSTAD ERIC WHITNEY CODY 16628 SE 15TH ST 2508 S 317TH ST #207 2506 S 317TH ST UNIT 204 BELLEVUE WA 98008 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800740 1541800390 1541800660 LACY CHRISTINA NOBLE LORENE KOITZSCH VERNON E+CAROL M 2502 S 317TH ST #202 2524 S 317TH ST UNIT 303 10309 AGATE PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 ANDERSON ISLAND WA 98303 1541801100 KIM MIRA L 2508 S 317TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le ciabarit AVERY® 51600 1541800500 CAMERON LORI ANN 2520 S 317TH ST #304 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 A Sens de chargement 1541800900 MARLENEE JESSICA M 2504 S 317TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Consultez la feuille www.avery.com d'instruction 1-stnn.Gn.OVFRV Easy Peel Labels A MIOW See Instruction Sheet iQAVERY8 5160® Use Avery® TEMPLATE 51600 1Feed - ner for Easy Peel Feature j 1541801080 1541800060 1541800670 JAMES CAROL L MITCHELL CINDY M LIU CHIH-YAO 28825 52ND PL S 2530 S 317TH ST #204 2512 S 317TH ST #301 AUBURN WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541801090 1541800240 ARNHOLD TERRY R MURPHY HAZEL M 2508 S 317TH ST #307 32290 1 STAVE S #354 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800120 1541800790 LOWRY LEIA+CAPATCH BRENT S ALARCON FRANK JR 7209 93RD STCT E 2502 S 317TH ST #303 PUYALLUP WA 98371 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800340 1541800800 DAUM SHAWN G MARCY JANET T 2524 S 317TH ST 202 2502 S 317TH ST #304 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800380 1541800820 FITTS JERRY M WAREHIME P STEPHEN 34848 54TH AVE S 2504 S 317TH ST #103 FEDERAL WAY WA 98001 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800550 1541800930 CHAPPELLE EDWARD D COLBY THEODORE R D+HEIDI E 2522 S 317TH ST #207 2506 S 317TH ST #201 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800370 1541800140 RYU NANCY S GREAVES DAVID+GEORGINA L 32815 42ND AVE S 2001 MANORWOOD DRIVE SE FEDERAL WAY WA 98001 PUYALLUP WA 98374 1541800610 1541800510 PAK MICHAEL H SAITO MITSUTAKA+HOLLY 2512 S 317TH ST #102 6302 N HALE ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 TACOMA WA 98407 1541800640 1541800560 DOUGHERTY MICHAEL+PAMELA PERIA-HANSEN GREGGORY 2512 S 317TH ST #202 2522 S 317TH ST UNIT 208 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1541800050 1541800580 HARVEY JACQUALINE MANTHEY PATRICIA G 2530 S 317TH ST #203 2522 S 217TH ST #306 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles a Peler A Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de chargement 1541800940 STEPHENS TROY E+RICE MICHEL PO BOX 25632 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 Consultez la feuille wwwaverycom d°instruction 1-900-GO-AVFRY Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to �IYERY® 51600 Use Avery® Template S1600 ' Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM '• 1 0921049200 LIU TIEN TSAI+CHUEN H 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0921049045 YI CHONG N & YOUNG S 31246 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049046 DANA PLAZA LLC Attn: C/O YUN SAM 1124 S 287TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049051 BALLI ROAD LLC 31620 23RD AVE S #218 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049053 HILLSIDE PLAZAASSOC LLC PO BOX 5003 BELLEVUE WA 98009 0921049057 FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049207 COMMERCIAL NET LEASE REALTY Attn: ATTN: LEASE COMPLIANCE 450 S ORANGE AVE #900 ORLANDO FL 32801 0921049208 SEATAC VILLAGE SHOPPING CTR Attn: ATTN TAX DEPT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049223 DANA PLAZA LLC Attn: C/O YUN SAM 1124 S 287TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049233 SEA -MAR COMM HEALTH CENTER 1040 S HENDERSON ST SEATTLE WA 98108 0921049235 WAL-MART PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 8050 #MS 0555 BENTONVILLE AR 72712 0921049241 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC Attn: PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 97034 BELLEVUE WA 98009 0921049109 NGUYEN THINH+GAM T PHAM 29520 2ND PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0921049110 SHIN MYUNG PLAZA LLC 25647 MARINE VIEW DR S DES MOINES WA 98198 0921049111 FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST 655 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1500 GLENDALE CA 91203 0921049112 SHIN MYUNG PLAZA LLC 25647 MARINE VIEW DR S DES MOINES WA 98198 0921049118 RHEKI FEDERAL WAY LLC Attn: C/O PACIFIC ASSET ADVISORS 600 108TH AVE NE #530 BELLEVUE WA 98004 0921049123 WILLAMETTE COURTAPARTMENTS 201 27TH AVE SE #A-200 PUYALLUP WA 98374 0921049125 WAL-MART PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 8050 MS 0555 BENTONVILLE AR 72712 0921049127 CP FEDERAL WAY LLC 1910 FAIRVIEW AVE E SUITE 500 SEATTLE WA 98102 0921049129 HANEY STEVEN S PO BOX 2009 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049137 ANS L L C PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049137 ANS LLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0821049077 HARSCH INVESTMNET PROPERTIE Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049078 ELLAYENN'S LLC. 1111 W NICKERSON ST SEATTLE WA 98119 0821049082 CLARE & JASMIN INC 1802 POINT WOODWORTH DR NE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0821049089 ALBERTSONS LLC Attn: CO PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440 0821049090 GROVE STREET LLC 1400 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0821049108 PATTEN PROPERTIES 17923 RIVIERA PL SW NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 31620 23RD AVE STE 200 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049017 Etiquettes faciles a peter A Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Sens de Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 Al cha Bement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-upTM 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel® Labels 1 ♦ ® Bend along line to AVERYa 516Q® Use AveryO Template 51600 j Feed Paper P-� expose Pop-up EdgeTM 1 1 0921049018 BRIGHTWATER APARTMENTS INC Attn: C/O LIM DANIEL C 31224 20TH AVE S #E-102 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049019 FIRST CITIZENS BANK & TRUST 655 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1500 GLENDALE CA 91203 0921049020 HANNA JON D Attn: C/O MICHELLE B NELSON INC P 33650 6TH AVE S #230 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049021 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS CI 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049026 FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049027 ANS L L C PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 7978200525 CALVARY EVANGELICAL LUTHERA 2415 S 320TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7978200526 KING COUNTY -TRANSIT Attn: ADM-ES-0800 500 4TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98004 7978200535 BACM 2004-1 320TH STREET SO 1601 WASHINGTON AVE STE 700 MIAMI BEACH FL 33139 7978200540 PACIFIC HOSPITALITY LLC 32124 25TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1500500080 HARSCH INVEST PROPS LLC Attn: ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND WA 97208 1500500080 HARSCH INVEST PROPERTIE LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049030 1500500090 ST CLARA LLC KC INVESTMENTS LLC 4250 DAWSON ST #1904 PO BOX 3482 BURNABY BC CANADA V5C4B1 00000 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0921049034 1500500100 KELLY WILLIAM R HARSCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIE 8323 JUANITA DR Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT KIRKLAND WA 98034 PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 1500500140 KILLY II LLC 1401 S 324TH ST #101 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1500500150 LARKSPUR CENTER LLC PO BOX 1762 SAN RAMON CA 94583 0380900010 TACOMA GOODWILL INDUSTRIES 714 S 27TH ST TACOMA WA 98409 0380900020 TACOMA GOODWILL INDUSTRIES 714 S 27TH ST TACOMA WA 98409 0821049013 PAVILION CENTER ASSOCIATES Attn: C/O KIMCO RLTY CORP POB 50 3333 NEW HYDE PK RD STE 100 NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 0821049052 WELLS FARGO BANK Attn: C/O THOMSON PROPERTY TAN PO BOX 2609 CARLSBAD' CA 92018 0821049060 U S BANK CORPORATE PROPS Attn: 2800 E LAKE ST LAKE0012 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55406 0821049061 TJOSSEM RUSSELL+MCEWEN JULI PO BOX 614 BOTHELL WA 98041 0921049035 1500500110 0921049146 RAM INTERNATIONAL HARSCH INVESTMENT PROPS LLC SONG & SONS INC PO BOX 98768 Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT 31622 PACIFIC HWY S LAKEWOOD WA 98496 PO BOX 2708 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049042 SSALLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 Etiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 i 1500500130 HARSCH INVEST PROPERTIE LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 A Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de chargement reveler le rebord Pop-UpTM 0921049159 LIU TIEN TSAI+CHUEN H 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 r www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ Bend along line to I INI��RY® 51600 i Use Avery® Template 5160® Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM 1 0921049162 0921049257 0921049291 SHIN MYUNG PLAZA LLC 25647 MARINE VIEW DR S DES MOINES WA 98198 0921049163 WAL-MART PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 8050 #MS 0555 BENTONTILLEAR 72712 0921049164 KUBRA PROPERTIES LLC 2900 SE 3RD ST RENTON WA 98056 0921049172 320TH STREET LLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049189 KIM WON T+YOUNG J 12011 21 STAVE SW BURIEN WA 98146 0921049190 MERIDIAN CRTAPTS LTD 201 27TH AVE SE BLDG A-200 PUYALLUP WA 98374 0921049248 P SQUARE PETROLEUM INC 8315 S 212TH ST KENT WA 98032 0921049252 YI CHONG & YOUNG 31246 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049255 THY CHOI FAMILY LLC 31656 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049256 LIU TIEN T 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 j LIU TIEN TSAI+CHUEN H 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0921049265 DANA PLAZA LLC Attn: C/O YUN SAM 1124 S 287TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049270 RETMAN SAM Attn: DARDEN RESTAURANTS PO BOX 695019 PROP TAX DEPT ORLANDO FL 32869 0921049271 CRATSENBERG PROPERTIES Attn: C/O TOTAL PROPERTY MGMNT 2222 MERIDIAN AVE E #E EDGEWOOD WA 98371 0921049272 MCDONALD'S REAL ESTATE TAX PO BOX 182571 COLUMBUS OH. 43218 0921049276 SHEON SHAM LLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049277 SHIN MYUNG PLAZA LLC 25647 MARINE VIEW DR S DES MOINES WA 98198 0921049280 FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049284 BEAL SERVICE GROUP 6000 LEGACY DR PLANO TX 75024 0921049286 DANA PLAZA LLC Attn: C/O YUN SAM 1124 S 287TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 ♦ ' Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de chargement rev6ler le rebord Pop-upTM j BUM CORP 31611 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049292 BETHANY INVESTMENTS LLC 16532 NW VETTER DR PORTLAND OR 97229 0921049293 THY CHOI FAMILY LLC 31656 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049296 CRATSENBERG PROPERTIES Attn: C/O STARBUCKS COFFEE CO3: PO BOX 34067/M S S-RE3 SEATTLE WA 98124 0921049297 CRATSEBBERG PROPERTIES LLC Attn: C/O TOTAL PROPERTY MGMNT 2222 MERIDIAN AVE E #E EDGEWOOD WA 98371 0921049302 BROADWAY-32ND STREET REALTY 43W32NDST NEW YORK NY 10001 0921049303 FEDERAL WAY CITY OF 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049304 WESTERN PALASIDE INC Attn: ARHTUR & SHRILEY INC PO BOX 3858 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0921049307 WOODSIDE APARTMENT LLC 2517 S 316TH LN FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049308 PHAM GAM+THINH NGUYEN 29520 2ND PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 www.averycom ; 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel® Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to I AVERY® 51600 1 Use AveryO Template 51600 j c^=d Paper - expose Pop-up EdgeTM j 1 0921049317 WOODSTONE CREDIT UNION PO BOX 27030 FEDERAL WAY WA 98093 0921049320 IHP FEDERAL WAY (WA) OWNER 50 COCOANUT ROW STE 2 PALM BEACH FL 33480 0921049321 SAN SHAM LLC PO BOX 1941 AUBURN WA 98071 0921049325 KING COUNTY -PROPERTY SVCS 500 4TH AVE #800 SEATTLE WA 98104 0821049125 U S BANK CORPORATE PROPS Attn: 2800 E LAKE ST LAKE0012 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55406 0821049126 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROPERTIE Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049169 PATTEN PROPERTIES 17923 RIVIERA PL SW NORMANDY PARK WA 98166 0821049174 PAVILION CENTER ASSOCIATES Attn: C/O KIMCO RLTY CORP POB 502 3333 NEW HYDE PK RD STE 100 NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 0821049181 KIMCO REALTY CORP 3333 NEW HYDE RD NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 0821049186 PAVILION CENTER ASSOCIATES Attn: C/O KIMCO RLTY CORP POB 502 3333 NEW HYDE PK RD STE 100 NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 Etiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 j 0821049194 BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS LLC Attn: ATTN PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 3092 HOUSTON TX 77253 0821049196 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROP LLC Attn: ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049196 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROP LLC Attn: ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049206 JEYO LLC 5545 173RD AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98006 1721049083 TACOMA GOODWILL INDUSTRIES 714 S 27TH ST TACOMA WA 98409 1721049084 WOLFHOUND LLC 1416 WHITEHORN ST FERNDALE WA 98248 2501200020 FARLEY F MIKE+CHERI 1825 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2501200030 PROSPERITY VENTURES LLC 1826 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0821049216 2501200040 PAVILION CENTER ASSOCIATES FEDERAL WAY PLAZA INC Attn: C/O KIMCO RLTY CORP POB 502 5506 VARCO RD NE 3333 NEW HYDE PK RD STE 100 TACOMA WA 98422 NEW HYDE PARK NY 11042 0821049228 VILLAGE INN RESTAURANT DBA Attn: QUINTANA INVESTMENTS INC 32939 49TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0821049229 NIEDER FAMILY LLC 1111 W NICKERSON ST SEATTLE WA 98119 0821049237 HARSCH INVESTMNT PROP LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0821049264 HARSCH INVESTMENT PROP LLC Attn: ATTN: TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0921049328 IHP FEDERAL WAY (WA) OWNER 50 COCOANUT ROW STE 2 PALM BEACH FL 33480 ♦ ' Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de chargement reveler le rebord Pop-upTM j 2501200050 1815 S 324TH PLACE LLC 2203 78TH AVE SE MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 2501200060 BORG WILLIAM D 1801 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2501200070 FARRIS NILES DAVID Attn: CASCADE VETERINARY HOSPI' 1804 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98002 2501200080 CLEOCO INC 17207 SE 46TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 2501200090 TIGER PROPERTIES LLC 140 S 294TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 1 Easy Peel® Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to 1 a �E��'�® 51600 1 Feed Paper Use AveryO Template 51600 '°�'� expose Pop-up EdgeTM 1 2501200100 NORTHWEST THERAPY ASSOCIATE 1705 S 324TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2501200110 CLEOCO INC 17207 SE 46TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 1621049023 KIM ALEX 27216 SE 416TH ST ENUMCLAW WA 98022 1621049028 FW TOWNE SQUARE L L C P O BOX 98922 TACOMA WA 98498 1621049037 BELMOR MOBILE HOME PARK LP 2101 S 324TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1621049039 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 1621049041 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA PO BOX 1919 WICHITA FALLS TX 76307 1621049042 CHTS INC 1616 S 325TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1621049043 KMS INVESTMENT INC 167 S 295TH PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 1621049044 KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON Attn: C/O FIRST AMER TAX VALUATN PO BOX 560807 DALLAS TX 75356 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERYO 51600 j 1621049049 CLEOCO INC 17207 SE 46TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98049 1621049052 BBSG INVESTMENTS LLC 1617 S 325TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2423200010 WINSON AT FEDERAL WAY LLC 1120 112TH AVE NE #620 BELLEVUE WA 98004 2423200020 WASHINGTON FEDERAL S&LASSN Attn: OWN REAL PROPERTY 425 PIKE ST SEATTLE WA 98101 2423200030 ZION INC 2202 S 320TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 2423200040 AWASHINGTON LLC 14500 ROSCOE BLVD #203 PANORAMA CITY CA 91402 2423200050 WINSON AT FEDERAL WAY LLC 1120 112TH AVE NE #620 BELLEVUE WA 98004 2423200055 WENDYS INTERNATIONAL INC PO BOX 256 DUBLIN OH 43017 2423200060 WINSON AT FEDERAL WAY LLC 1120 112TH AVE NE #620 BELLEVUE WA 98004 2423200070 SOUND CREDIT UNION 1331 BROADWAY TACOMA WA 98402 Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de chargement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-upTM i 7853600035 WILHELM M A & S M TRUSTEES PO BOX 4372 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600036 KOSTELICH THOMAS J 31005 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600037 NORTON BRIAN D 17837 1 STAVE S #328 NORMANDY PARK WA 98148 7853600040 PAINTER MARY FRANCES+HOOPER 31021 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600045 HOOPER SHANNON K 31021 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600050 PETTIGREW BUCK O+RHONDA S 31033 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600055 SISSON TIMOTHY+MARY 31045 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600060 CHOE PHILLIP S 35418 7TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 7853600061 ARNDT CAROL & GEORGE PO BOX 1191 MILTON WA 98354 7853600062 NOBLE JAMES H+BEVERLY K 32217 25TH AVE SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 www.avery.com 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy Peel® Labels ♦ ® Bend along line to 1 �0/��� O 5160® i Use Avery® Template 51600 j ;:I'd Paper � expose Pop-up EdgeTM j 1 7853600063 7853600155 7853600185 ARNDT CAROL & GEORGE PO BOX 1191 MILTON WA 98354 7853600065 JANG LEE LLC 344 NE 156TH AVE PORTLAND OR 97230 7853600070 SEATAC VILLAGE PROPERTY LLC 15919 MAIN ST E SUMNER WA 98390 7853600071 SEATAC VILLAGE PROPERTY LLC 15919 MAIN ST E SUMNER WA 98390 7653600072 SEATAC VILLAGE PROPERTY LLC 15919 MAIN ST E SUMNER WA 98390 7853600075 SPA FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 3691 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 7853600085 CALCATERRA KAREN S 17219 TIGER MOUNTAIN RD SE ISSAQUAH WA 98027 7853600086 CANDEE ENTERPRISES LLC 31215 41 ST PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600087 CANDEE ENTERPRISES LLC 31215 41 ST PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600091 CANDEE ENTERPRISES LLC 3121541STPLSW FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 OKAMOTO KIYOSATO 1639 S 310TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600156 P KOKKO PROPERTIES LLC 2318 34TH ST SE PUYALLUP WA 98374 7853600157 HENDERSON LESLIE 3306 SW 323RD ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 7853600160 GOLDEN INVESTMENT FUND LLC PO BOX 3871 KENT WA 98032 7853600170 FEDERAL WAY INTERNATIONAL 1 1634 S 312TH ST #101 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600171 ROCZ LARRY R 3634 46TH SW SEATTLE WA 98116 7853600176 DIESING CHARLES F 4301 W VALLEY HWY E #100 SUMNER WA 98390 7853600180 FEDERAL WAY INTERNATIONAL 1 1634 S 312TH ST#101 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600181 TRAN TIEN THANH 1748 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7853600182 CHANG CHUN SOO+KEUM SOON 1636 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 SUNG TONY 7332 32ND AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 7853600186 JACK IN THE BOX 9330 BALBOAAVE SAN DIEGO CA 92123 7853600187 MINKYU & MISOOK LLC 15647 SE 43RD ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 7853600200 DOLLAR TREE STORES 500 VOLVO PKWY #300 CHESAPEAKE VA 23320 7853600212 FARRELL GROUP LLC 17786 DES MOINES MEMORIAL DR BURIEN WA 98148 7622400015 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO 3333 BEVERLY RD *BC-151A HOFFMAN ESTATES IL 60179 0537000525 BELL WILLIAM J & LADY DONNA 31014 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000530 MARKLAND RONALD L+VICKIE L 31002 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 5999700010 PACIFIC CONVENIENCE & FUELS Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT 7180 KOLL CENTER PKWAY #100 PLEASANTON CA 94566 LAI TONY+WONG HEIDI 609 107TH PL SE EVERETT WA 98208 0537000505 Etiquettes faciles a peler ARepliez a la hachure afin de I vuvuw.averycom h Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5160� i Sens de reveler le rebord Po u TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' j cargement p' p j 1 Easy Peel® Labels i ♦ ® Bend along line to gVERY® 51600 Use Avery® Template 5160® Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM 1 0537000510 SCISCENTE STEVEN M+SONIA E 31030 24TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000511 KWON TAI HO+EVELYN J 5255 N OAK HILL RD FOND DULAC WI 54935 0537000512 ANALARYAN OLGA+GERASIM 31018 24TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000513 SMITH STEVAN M+SUSAN L 31012 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000520 LESH CHARLES PRESTON 31026 S 22ND AVE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000549 STOWERS DUANE B SR 31031 24TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000551 SIDORKO ALEKSANDR+TATIYANA 31025 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000552 MCKINLEY ROBERTA+NATALYA 31013 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000553 LUONG NICK Q+MAI L DANG 31019 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000571 VANCE JULIE L 31003 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000572 BLANCHETTE COLLEEN V 30861 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000575 SLEEMAN RONALD L 31017 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000576 BROWN JAMES T+DANIELLE C 31021 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000577 VERBITSKY GERALD L+DEBORAH 31019 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000580 GILL SWARN S+KAMALJIT KAUR 31029 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000585 MCARTHUR CLARA E 31026 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000690 PARRETT JEANETTE M+LESLIE R 31012 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000591 BREWER BRUCE W+MARGARET C 31016 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 PEREZ LEONEL 31014 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 CADY BRIAN D 31034 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000592 0537000620 0537000621 LO HERBERT DR 28921 5TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000622 KIM KWANG HOON+NAM SUNG 31044 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000623 PANLASIGUI AMORSOLO+RITA 9215 S 204TH ST KENT WA 98031 0537000625 PANLASIGUI AMORSOLO+RITA 9215 S 204TH ST KENT WA 98031 0537000630 CRESSE PAUL+YEUN 26623 LAKE FENWICK RD S KENT WA 98032 0537000631 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0537000635 FRASER DAVID+NOVELLA 2036 S 312TH FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000636 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0537000637 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 0537000640 LE LUC TAN+THANH THI TRAN 30348 24TH PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles a peler ; A Repliez a la hachure afin de ; www.avery.com Utilisez le abarit AVERY® 51600 Sens de reveler le rebord Po -u TM ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' 9 j chargement p p j ,� Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 51600 i A ♦ Bend along line to I ,d Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM j i ,A VERYO 51600 I 1 0537000641 GLAVATSKIY LEONID F 2042 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000642 PROKHOR VIKTOR 2040 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000645 WHITEHEAD KAREN 31055 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000646 MURAGE ANTHONY+HANAH WAITH/ 31037 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000647 TOMSON ROBERT M+SALLY INNES 31045 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000650 MARRIOTT GUIYING 2214 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000651 HOLLY SCOTT 2204 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000652 RAUTIO PATRICK L 31054 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000653 WELLS BARBARA J 31052 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000655 BODEN SHANNON F 31046 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 l 0537000656 BUTLER CLIFFORD 31040 22ND AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000660 MOMOTYUK YURIY+VALENTINA 27327 48TH AVE S KENT WA 98032 0537000665 AKI EDWARD W+ELNA D 2236 S 312TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000670 SHEMER OLEG+ALINA S 31102 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000672 BELLALICIA F 31113 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000675 TAYLOR SALLY J 32228 46TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0537000680 BROWN NICHAEL N 3177 LAS BRISAS WAY PALM SPRINGS CA 92264 0537000685 TSAI JULIA 4424 S 332ND PL FEDERAL WAY WA 98001 0537000690 READ STEVE 12108 18TH ST E EDGEWOOD WA 98372 7622400011 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 A ' Sens de Repliez a la hachure afin de chargement reveler le rebord Pop-upTM 7622400025 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400019 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400018 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400017 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400014 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400013 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400012 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7622400010 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 7853600210 7-ELEVEN Attn: C/O RYAN LLC 13155 NOEL RD STE 100 LB73 DALLAS TX 75240 7622400020 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 www.avery.com I 1-800-GO-AVERY i Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 51600 7622400021 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 0921049299 SENIOR CITY LP 123 E 96TH ST TACOMA WA 98445 0921049298 CPSRTA (SOUND TRANSIT) 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104 0921049054 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 33330 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049221 FWP VENTURES LLLP 7525 SE 24TH ST #315 MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 1500500120 HARSCH INVEST PROPERTIE LLC Attn: ATTN TAX DEPARTMENT PO BOX 2708 PORTLAND OR 97208 0537000671 CHONG BAEK E 31105 24TH CT S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 7622400016 COMMONS MALL LLC 18100 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500 IRVINE CA 92612 0821049062 ALBERTSONS LLC Attn: CO PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 990 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55440 0921049166 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 33325 8TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 Eticluettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 51600 ♦ ® Bend along line to j Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeT'" 0921049113 LIU TIEN TSAI+CHUEN HWA 31448 PACIFIC HWY S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0921049258 LIU TIEN T 33430 11TH PL SW FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 0537000595 PHAN LONG 31000 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000593 PHAN LONG 31000 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 0537000594 PHAN LONG 31000 20TH AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 ®' AVERY® 5160® i I I I ' Se de Repliez a la hachure afin de i www.avery.com ' reveler le rebord Po u Tee ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' j chargement p- p j 1 r 25-P11- -.Y October 16, 2015 Re: 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) The City of Federal Way invites you to comment on the 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). The Draft SEIS includes an update to the transportation analysis for the City Center Planned Action subarea. The EIS being supplemented is the City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued in 2006. Subsequently four Addenda to the 2006 EIS have been issued. A Planned Action Ordinance was adopted in 2007. Addendum #4 to the 2006 EIS extended the end timeframe of development for which the Planned Action Ordinance applies from 2014 to September 30, 2015. The Planned Action designation means further environmental review on development within the designated Planned Action area is not necessary if the proposed development is consistent with the development levels of the adopted Planned Action Ordinance. The planned action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312th Street, on the south by South 324tb Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23�d Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23,d Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317d' Street and on the south by South 319d' Place. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Polig Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Environmental issues evaluated in this Draft SEIS include air quality, land use, aesthetics, transportation, public services (police, fire/EMS, parks and recreation), and utilities (water, sewer, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications). Public and agency comment is invited regarding the proposed action and alternative. The documents are posted on the City's website at hrtp:(Jwww.ci.federal-nmy.wa.us/index.aspx?NID=503. CD copies may be purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way. Comments are due no later than November 16, 2015, and should be addressed to: Stacey Welsh, AICP, Senior Planner City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 stacey.welshQciryroffederahvay.com A public meeting will be held to receive comment regarding the proposal on: November 9, 2015 4:30-6:30 p.m. Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers 33325 811, Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or stacey=.welshQcitgoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Michael A. Morales Community Development Director c: Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner CITY OF Federal Way Addendum to the 2006 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) DEPAIrrMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 VAvenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 citya-P era3way.cam Name of Proposal: City Center Planned Action EIS: Use -Mix Addendum Description of Proposal: Amendments to the above referenced EIS to redistribute the anticipated mix of land uses within the planned action area. The Final EIS became effective September 8, 2006. Description of Addendum The addendum re -allocates the mix of land uses identified within the EIS. The re -allocation is necessary to accommodate pending and anticipated projects, including the Symphony mixed -use project, within the planned action area. Demand for residential units is higher than originally anticipated. Residential units are increased and retail square footage is decreased proportionally. Se�nlicized ►vs in table below: 1 Land Use Current guoDy Addendum A usted Quantity Residential Units 750 9'-— 00 Office S uare Footage 350,000 35". 08, 3ora, rras Retnil S Beare Foota , Le�� Lodging (Rooms) 600 ddii' �' 00 _wStructur�.>°-axking�9�_ -� �� 4— �•�.3:��—mow. v1, The above noted changes do not alter assumptions contained within IFI5 %9th regard to traffic impacts or other environmental impacts. Minor changes in disclosed impacts <<rsr'result, however, no new or substantially different significant, adverse impacts are anticipated to any of the elements of the environment discussed in the EIS. If you have any questions regarding this Addendum, please contact Isaac Conlen, Senior Planner, at 253- 835-2643. This Addendum is issued on the 8th of February, 2008. dreg Feiwiils, Federal Way SEPA Official A ta0mcni.- VahivabrTrip, Conveslon Ralos / - ya4j? r)-7vv►C- PJt I QD FWCC - Chapter Five, Housing Household Income Understanding the distribution of Federal Way's household income is critical in planning for its future housing needs. A household's income dictates its housing decisions and opportunities. The King County Benchmark Program defines income groups as follows: Very Low Income: 0 - 30% of county median income Low Income: 31-50% of county median income Moderate Income: 51-80% of county median income Middle Income: 81-120% of county median income Upper Income: 120% or more of county median income According to the 2011-2013 American Community Survey (ACS) 3-Year Estimates, Federal Way's median household income was $53,131, which is less than King County's median of $70,998. It ranks fourth of the seven South King County cities surveyed.' Federal Way's income groups are distributed in approximately a 50:50 split, with approximately 50 percent of residents with middle and greater incomes and 50 percent with moderate and lesser incomes. Figure V-2 Households By Income Level Very Low 20% Low Middle and 12% Upper 50% Moderate 18% Source: 2011-2013 American Community Survey (ACS) 3-Year Estimates Household Size The 2011-2013 ACS shows that at 2.7 persons per household, Federal Way has a larger average household size than King County, whose average household size is 2.4. Federal Way has a greater household size than Auburn, Des Moines, and Renton, but a smaller household size than Kent and SeaTac and the same average size as Burien. However, as for most cities, Federal Way consists predominately of one and two person households, as the figure below shows. Three reasons for Federal Way's relatively large average household size is its large percentage 68 percent) of families, its relatively high number of immigrants (who tend to have large families), and the overcrowding of its housing due to affordability and availability issues. 1 The South King County cities used in this comparison are Aubum, Burien, Des Moines, Kent, Federal Way, Renton, and SeaTac. Revised 2015 V-6 FW TAZ LUDESCR Floor Area_SgFt fix DU/HOTEL 1050 Conv Store with Gas 1359 109 1050 Office Building 4680 112 1050 Restaurant/Lounge 17612 109 1050 Retail Store 22614 109 1050 Retail(Line/Strip) 4752 109 1050 Vacant(Commercial) 0 1050 Vet/Animal Control Srvc 3956 112 1051 Car Wash 4500 109 1051 Restaurant(Fast Food) 3127 109 1051 Restaurant/Lounge 5286 109 1051 Retail Store 5722 109 1051 1052 Vacant(Commercial) Bank 0 17170 / 112 J 1052 Hotel/Motel 120776 112,,/230 -J� 1052 Restaurant(Fast Food) 1566 109v/ 1052 Retail Store 24320 109/� 1052 Retail(Line/Strip) 25809 109,../ ti31 r 1052 Utility, Public 0 J 1052 Vacant(Commercial) 0 37.0 9 1053 Conv Store with Gas 2036 1091720` 1053 ShoppingCtr(Community) 164020 109 -7VO /6, f7710 1053 Tavern/Lounge 5715 109 1054 Retail Store 17875 109 ZJ �a9 1717 0 1P 1054 Retail(Line/Strip) 22609 109 fflw"""" 1055 Office Building 23136 112 y� "_""�"'v 11 f✓ �0 T 1055 Retail(Discount) 128711 109��''I 1055 Vacant(Commercial) 0 1056 Grocery Store 65714 109 1056 Restaurant/Lounge 7401 109 1056 Right of Way/Utility, Road 0 1056 Vacant(Commercial) 0 1059 Apartment 172304 190 1060 Shopping Ctr(Community) 114293 109 1061 Retail Store 49716 109 1061 Retail(Discount) 101909 109 t.vtt 1062 Vacant(Commercial) 0 r 063 Governmental Service 331874 1063 Retirement Facility 68620 64 1064 Bank 500 112 1064 Restaurant(Fast Food) 3634 109 1064 Restaurant/Lounge 8056 109 1064 Shopping Ctr(Nghbrhood) 68855 109 '] 1064 Tract 0 I 1065 Bank 8062 112 1065 Gas Station 150 109 1065 Restaurant/Lounge 7958 109 1065 Retail Store 107394 109 1065 Right of Way/Utility, Road 0 1065 Vacant(Commercial) 0 1068 Shopping Ctr(Nghbrhood) 0 109 1068 Vacant(Commercial) 0 1069 Restaurant(Fast Food) 5663 109 1069 Restaurant/Lounge 10350 109 1069 Retail Store 12640 109 1116 Bank 5041 112 1116 Movie Theater 61146 109 1116 Retail Store 4500 109 1116 Shopping Ctr(Maj Retail) 800677 109 1116 Tract 0 Federal Way TAZ Structure: HH Income (Units) (Units) FW_TAZ ID LIHH LMIHH UMIHH UIHH Total 2013 HH Total 2019 HH Total 2026 HH Satar RAS-HH Revised PAS HH Totai 2040 HH per YEAR Growth 19 - 40 HH Growth 19 - 13 1060 0 0 0 0 0 16 33 33 0 75 3 16 1061 0 0 0 0 0 7 14 U 0 33 1 7 1052 0 0 0 0 0 17 34 34 150 78 3 17 1063 0 0 0 0 0 65 133 433 150 302 11 65 1064 0 0 0 0 0 11 22 22 0 51 2 11 1056 8 8 3 1 20 51 83 83 86 163 5 31 1056 0 0 0 0 0 23 47 92 107 107 4 23 1059 69 69 22 12 171 171 171 1-74 0 171 0 0 1060 0 0 0 0 0 149 305 3" 305 696 26 149 1061 0 0 0 0 0 26 54 383 383 123 5 26 1062 0 0 0 0 0 43 88 0 0 200 7 43 1063 25 25 8 4 62 62 62 4= 62 62 0 0 1064 0 0 0 0 0 31 63 63 143 143 5 31 1065 0 0 0 0 0 83 169 260 385 385 14 83 1068 0 0 0 0 0 81 166 246 379 379 14 81 1069 0 0 0 0 0 17 34 34 0 77 3 17 1116 0 0 0 0 0 218 446 446 260 1016 38 218 142 Total HH 253 1.071 1,925 2,400 2.400 4.061 854 Planned Action = 2,400 ]Wan J r I Rr r tip: r!! y F•,srer Planne Action SEPA Update 1� 2425 HH Grow h by TAI" +r ' .. Lam, ry g j South 3111h Str<M L�Ae fn,,rtcnnc r r Park Steel Lake L HMart Paid Lyerprbs f Sowt313th Street aC Sfre,r Lake Sg Pavilions 3p atn.ra-,, Center _ rc --- - k , h.� "»»_____. 5 �'i A i' �- rolcr ruun 383 co�,rt .11 t Sarah 315th 5trect E c W[oasdC . t sow, 316th Lane H 5 Truman F High School South 316th50eet Chelsea, S F'grrt�r ► Court a - ApyC i7peatC r5 `I s+ 1 SNe• p.,s r �e� vr.vv 7•.r,s. t.rR� � C� 1 r ~ South 3161h Place » � -. _ .._..._ ... ^_ 1 t r -------^-� Pavilions Center i 3-79 ll South3 Gattway o Federal ` t C teCenter � r Way Public l� Schools r f Bus Lot t ttd, 1 1 Stoll, F - ' .. f ' �► fififta f t 1 i i i � fttit tt' ;`I —J t at t rtta f ro�nn �� , r f t ' S t:e�Urarron ,� i S.tM,ti, r �Qnter �YTi T 7F� 7{)r1S r = r — sears r �'r., ' rat 3 Y ® f t �1t1t1 a 1 1 ' t t t~ i Centur 1 rft %f t t:fltl Jfltlrl 1 1 f !t + Fed+alVlay t y P&R t - alMti------ ------------- ��+ r Federal R WrIged Fact Wayrl .. WayP(aZa 1 �r c jSouth , A _______ 1 'I i BA cAmInole Larw -)7tgrpa //� ; © 0 contributors. Planned Action EPA Upd to Employment Gro th from 013 ' South 1 311th SUM C Al,.,.. (21805) ...AF} � " Park k � �, " SteetLake P4tzd C',/VO'L's { } --r South 313lhStmet �r HMart Walmart4M y Lswe Ij -Hillside Pavilions Dana Plaza — Center �� a i � 1 M1lL ll[lld f 1 Salt„315th Street i a tNOoo±.nc 1 � rWarimcn[ - Sash 316th Lane H 5 Tniman- . High SOMI --- South 316thSUeet 23S ; rl F rr_�u,r xa7wt: i+�a>�rs rZ % 402 •+ Chetiea a SO, [ W-wT—Cea r,}sae j y t ©� 1 1 hStreet I � --------- ----.-.---- 1 8 Pavilions South 3lfilh P,laoe � i Center 11 south}.. i Gateway Federal Way Public Schools F i ( , Center — i Bus Lot fi{ i }1 I l 1f f } _ f f{}i } } } , ; SOIRFI COrIM'grs = { 1 Sf�irlft' .. 1 tiaSpYtdY r �ente. regJ7 fi il7S 1 I Sears 1 1{}1f 1 1 1 i Cenhrry r } I f I f f } I f l f 1} f l f I f I f 1 r ! j Federal Way PS'R • \ �! 7•� x 1 Federal Way Plaza • 1 Wrged Fact Way � 1 South �• ........... . \ a - •\ a . � c�nlnole Lane 1 � } , _ ©0 p contributors. Federal Wal 2025 PAS Employment Data (Employees) (Employees) (Employees) (Employees) (Employees) (Employees) (Employees) f W„ T,a.Z ID Retail FIRES WCTUIMANU Total 2019 Employment PAS Retail PAS FIRES PAS WCTUIMANU Total PAS Employment Total 2025 Employment Total 2040 Employment Empl Growth per Year 19 - 40 2013 Employment 1060 38 98 0 136 43 109 0 162 152 193 2.72 117 1051 11 31 0 42 15 42 0 57 57 94 2.44 42 1062 25 140 0 166 56 302 0 358 258 490 15.47 127 1063 358 142 9 510 431 171 13 615 616 877 17.50 381 1054 15 17 0 32 35 39 0 74 74 178 6.96 26 1055 224 16 0 240 244 17 0 261 261 314 3.53 221 1066 134 16 0 151 201 24 0 225 175 236 4.07 77 1059 0 19 0 19 0 19 0 19 19 19 0.00 19 1060 64 103 13 180 66 107 15 188 188 209 1.36 148 1061 168 115 0 283 156 569 0 725 283 283 0.00 35 1062 72 40 0 112 0 5 0 5 112 112 0.00 0 1063 0 5 0 5 5 44 0 49 29 91 4.11 6 1064 49 219 0 268 80 355 0 435 360 590 15.35 236 1065 149 171 0 320 250 285 0 535 435 724 19.26 197 1068 45 40 0 85 166 146 0 312 150 312 10.80 0 1069 17 196 0 212 22 268 0 290 290 485 12.97 193 1116 8Z8 710 0 1518 907 778 0 1686 2119 3570 96.77 1359 Total 2,196 2,079 22 4.298 2,6T7 3 28 5,985 5.577 8777 3,181 5111% 48.37% 0.52% 44.73% 54,80% 0.47% 1280 3,200 21330 Planned Action SEPA Land Use Size Conversion Factor SF or Room per Job Office Square Footage (PSRC Data) 300,000 250 1,200 Education Square Footage (treat as office) 100,000 250 400 Retail Square Footage (PSRC Data) 475,000 500 950 Lodging Room (FW Data) 600 236 255 Total Employment = 2,805 2013 Employ + PAS Employ = 5,985 - 2025 Employ = 408 of A� City of Federal Way Federal way Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis June 20, 2006 Prepared by � TrrnroorrrrJon Pl�nnlnp 6 EnOlnemrinp Mirai Associates CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION EIS Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering June 20, 2006 EXPIRES Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Table of Contents INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 Outlineof Study........................................................................................................................ I ProjectDescription...................................................................................................................1 SiteLocation.............................................................................................................................. 2 ExistingLand Use..................................................................................................................... 4 ProposedLand Use................................................................................................................... 4 ApprovedProjects in the Vicinity........................................................................................... 6 SCOPE OF IMPACT ANALYSIS.............................................................................................. 6 StudyIntersections................................................................................................................... 6 Definitionof Impact.................................................................................................................. 7 INVENTORY OF EXISTING AND PLANNED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ............... 8 RoadwayFacilities.................................................................................................................... 8 Functional Classification.............................................................................. 9 SystemDescription................................................................................................................. 9 Right-of-Way........................................................................................................................ 11 BaseYear (2004) Volumes................................................................................................... 12 Base Year (2004) Volumes.... .... .......................................................................................... 13 Existing Traffic Operations................................................................................................... 20 Parking.................................................................................................................................. 21 CollisionData....................................................................................................................... 22 Future Conditions Analysis................................................................................................... 24 TransitServices....................................................................................................................... 28 PedestrianFacilities................................................................................................................ 30 PedestrianFacilities................................................................................................................ 31 BicycleFacilities...................................................................................................................... 31 IMPACTS OF ALTERNATIVES - 2009.................................................................................. 35 TripGeneration..................................................................................................................... 35 ModalSplit............................................................................................................................ 36 NoAction (Alternative 3)....................................................................................................... 36 TrafficGrowth...................................................................................................................... 36 TrafficVolumes.................................................................................................................... 37 2009 No Action Traffic Operations...................................................................................... 44 2009 No Action Deficiencies................................................................................................ 45 ParkingRequirement............................................................................................................ 45 Traffic Safety Impact............................................................................. 46 TransitService Impact.......................................................................................................... 46 PedestrianAccessibility........................................................................................................ 46 BicycleMobility Impact....................................................................................................... 46 ProposedMitigation.............................................................................................................. 46 Alternative1............................................................................................................................ 48 Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment.................................................................... 48 6/20/2006 1 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis TrafficVolumes.................................................................................................................... 48 2009 Alternative 1 Traffic Operations.................................................................................. 48 2009 Alternative 1 Deficiencies............................................................................................ 58 ....................................................... Parking Requirements ............................................... ..... 59 TrafficSafety Impact............................................................................................................ 60 Transit Service Impact.......................................................................................................... 60 Pedestrian Accessibility........................................................................................................ 60 BicycleMobility Impact....................................................................................................... 60 ProposedMitigation..................................................... ................... .......... .... ............... ......... 60 Alternative2............................................................................................................................ 62 Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment.................................................................... 62 TrafficVolumes.................................................................................................................... 62 2009 Alternative 2 Traffic Operations.................................................................................. 62 2009 Alternative 2 Deficiencies............................................................................................ 72 ParkingRequirement............................................................................................................ 73 TrafficSafety Impact............................................................................................................ 73 TransitService Impact.......................................................................................................... 74 Pedestrian Accessibility........................................................................................................ 74 BicycleMobility Impact....................................................................................................... 74 ProposedMitigation.............................................................................................................. 74 2014 FORECASTS..................................................................................................................... 76 ForecastMethodology............................................................................................................ 76 RoadwayImprovement Assumptions................................................................................... 76 TripGeneration...................................................................................................................... 76 TripDistribution and Assignment........................................................................................ 77 2014 No Action Traffic Volumes........................................................................................... 77 2014 Alternative 1 Traffic Volumes...................................................................................... 81 PMPeak Hour.........................................................................................................--...---..... 81 AMPeak Hour...................................................................................................................... 81 SaturdayPeak Hour.............................................................................................................. 81 2014 Alternative 2 Traffic Volumes...................................................................................... 85 PMPeak Hour....................................................................................................................... 85 AMPeak Hour..................................................................................•........._......................... 85 SaturdayPeak Hour.............................................................................................................. 85 MITIGATION............................................................................................................................. 89 MitigationCost Assumptions................................................................................................. 89 MitigationImprovements....................................................................................................... 90 Comparisonof Alternatives................................................................................................... 90 Timingof Implementation..................................................................................................... 93 AdditionalMitigation............................................................................................................. 94 ALTERNATIVE MODE SUPPORT MEASURES......................................................... 97 EMPLOYER -BASED TDM MEASURES....................................................................... 97 OTHERSTRATEGIES...................................................................................................... 98 Mirai Transportation ii 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 6/20/2006 iii Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Tables Table 1. FWCC Land Uses — January 2002.................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Proposed Development 2004-2009................................................................................... 5 Table 3. Proposed Development 2010-2014................................................................................... 5 Table4. Study Intersections............................................................................................................ 7 Table 5. Level of Service Definitions............................................................................................. 8 Table 6. Characteristics of Functional Classifications of Streets ................................................... 9 Table 7. Right -of -Way for Major Area Streets............................................................................. 11 Table 8. 2004 Intersection Operations PM Peak, AM Peak, and Saturday Peak ........................ 20 Table 9. Existing Parking Supply by Block.................................................................................. 21 Table 10. Existing Parking Requirements.................................................................................... 22 Table 11. 2000-2002 Intersection Collision Rates........................................................................ 23 Table 12. 2000-2002 Corridor Collision Rates............................................................................. 24 Table 13. Assumed Annual Traffic Growth Rates 2004-2009..................................................... 24 Table 14. 2005-2010 Transportation Improvement Program....................................................... 26 Table 15: ITE Trip Generation Rates for Federal Way City Center ............................................. 35 Table 16: Summary of Peak Hour Trip Generation for Federal Way City Center (2004-2009) .. 36 Table 17. 2009 Traffic Operations No Action (Alternative 3)..................................................... 44 Table 18. Additional Parking Required for Alternative 3 at Buildout.......................................... 45 Table 19. No Action Proposed Mitigation.................................................................................... 47 Table 20. 2009 Alternative 1 Intersection Operations................................................................. 58 Table 21. Additional Parking Required for Alternative 1 at Buildout.......................................... 59 Table 22. Alternative 1 Mitigation................................................................................................ 61 Table 23. 2009 Alternative 2 Intersection Operations................................................................. 72 Table 24. Additional Parking Required for Alternative 2 at Buildout.......................................... 73 Table 25. Alternative 2 Mitigation................................................................................................ 75 Table 26: Summary of Trip Generation for Federal Way City Center (2010-2014) .................... 77 Table 27. Mitigation Cost Assumptions...................................................................................... 89 Table 28. PM Peak Hour 2009 Mitigation.................................................................................... 91 Table 29. AM Peak Hour 2009 Mitigation................................................................................... 92 Table 30. Saturday Peak Hour 2009 Mitigation........................................................................... 93 Table 31. Intersection Operations by Peak Hour with Mitigation ............................................. — 94 Mirai Transportation iv 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Figures Figure1. Location Map................................................................................................................3 Figure 2. Functional Classification............................................................................................10 Figure 3. Proposed FWCC Street Network................................................................................12 Figure 4. Existing PM Volumes........................................................................................... 14-15 Figure 5. Existing AM Volumes.......................................................................................... 16-17 Figure 6. Existing Saturday Volumes.................................................................................. 18-19 1 Figure 7. 2005-2010 TIP............................................................................................................27 Figure 8. Existing Transit Services Figure 9. Existing Park and Ride Lots.......................................................................................30 Figure 10. Existing Pedestrian Facilities.................................................................................... 32 Figure 11. Existing Bicycle Facilities........................................................................................ 33 Figure 12. Future Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities...................................................................34 ` Figure 13. 2009 No Action PM Peak Turning Volumes ...................................................... 38-39 Figure 14. 2009 No Action AM Peak Turning Volumes ..................................................... 40-41 Figure 15. 2009 No Action Saturday Peak Turning Volumes ............................................. 42-43 r Figure 16. 2009 Alternative I PM Peak Trip Distribution.........................................................49 # Figure 17. 2009 Alternative 1 AM Peak Trip Distribution........................................................50 Figure 18. 2009 Alternative I Saturday Peak Trip Distribution Figure 19. 2009 Alternative I PM Peak Turning Volumes ........................ Figure 20. 2009 Alternative I AM Peak Turning Volumes ................................................. 54-55 Figure 21. 2009 Alternative 1 Saturday Peak Turning Volumes ......................................... 56-57 Figure 22. 2009 Alternative 2 PM Peak Trip Distribution Volumes.........................................63 Figure 23. 2009 Alternative 2 AM Peak Trip Distribution Volumes.........................................64 Figure 24. 2009 Alternative 2 Saturday Peak Trip Distribution................................................65 Figure 25. 2009 Alternative 2 PM Peak Turning Volumes .................................................. 66-67 ,1 Figure 26. 2009 Alternative 2 AM Peak Turning Volumes ................................................. 68-69 Figure 27. 2009 Alternative 2 Saturday Peak Turning Volumes ......................................... 70-71 } Figure 28. 2014 Volumes - PM Peak Hour - No Action..........................................................78 Figure 29. 2014 Volumes - AM Peak Hour - No Action.......................................................... 79 ti Figure 30. 2014 Volumes - Saturday Peak Hour - No Action ............... Figure 31. 2014 Volumes - PM Peak Hour - Alternative 1...................................................... 82 Figure 32. 2014 Volumes - AM Peak Hour - Alternative I ...................................................... 83 Figure 33. 2014 Volumes - Saturday Peak Hour - Alternative 1.............................................. 84 Figure 34. 2014 Volumes - PM Peak Hour - Alternative 2...................................................... 86 Figure 35. 2014 Volumes - AM Peak Hour - Alternative 2...................................................... 87 Figure 36. 2014 Volumes - Saturday Peak Hour - Alternative 2.............................................. 88 6/20/2006 v Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Introduction This study describes the transportation impacts associated with the development of the Federal Way City Center (FWCC) project located in Federal Way, WA. This study assesses the expected impact of the proposed land use changes in the City Center planning area on the City's transportation systems, including roadways and intersections, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian facilities, and identifies actions and improvements to mitigate the impacts. The study follows the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) guidelines from the City of Federal Way Public Works Department dated June 2004. Individual development projects proposed within the FWCC planning area may be required to provide additional analysis of the specific impact of their project on the transportation system as directed by the Director of Public Works. Outline of Study This study analyzes existing conditions (2004) and the short-term (2009) and longer - term (2014) impacts of the three FWCC project alternatives. The existing traffic operations (Base Year) and transportation systems are described for the AM peak, PM peak, and Saturday peak hour periods. Future traffic operations are described for two action (Alternatives 1 and 2) and one no -action (Alternative 3) alternative for 2009 and 2014 for the AM peak, PM peak, and Saturday peak hour periods. The year 2009 was selected to correspond to the City's 6-yearTransportation Improvement Program (TIP)' and to Phase 1 of the Federal Way City Center's development (see the City Center Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement, Jones and Stokes, Incorporated, 2005, for further details). The year 2014 represents the completion of proposed development based on the City of Federal Way's City Center Market Analysis (Eco Northwest 2002). The 2009 analysis provides a detailed description of the expected transportation impacts and proposed mitigation of the proposed alternatives. The 2014 analysis provides a more generalized description of future transportation impacts associated with the FWCC plan. A technical appendix to this document provides details about the scope of work, assumptions, and analysis results for this study. Additional technical information is available on compact disc from the City of Federal Way. Project Description The proposed FWCC will develop an urbanized central core within Federal Way containing a mix of land uses including housing, retail, and civic uses. Chapter 7 (Page vii-1) of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2002) describes the principal purposes of the FWCC as to: iff Create an identifiable downtown that is the social and economic focus of the City; ■ Strengthen the City as a whole by providing for long-term growth in employment and housing; • Promote housing opportunities close to employment; 1 Projects from the updated 2005-2010 TIP were applied to the 2009 model year. 6/20/2006 1 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis • Support development of an extensive regional transportation system; ■ Reduce dependency on automobiles; • Consume less land with urban development; ■ Maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services; • Reduce costs of and time required for permitting; • Provide a central gathering place for the community; and • Improve the quality of urban design for all developments. This vision will be carried out by encouraging a compact form of development that will mix retail, commercial, and residential land uses. The FWCC transit center and the FWCC Park & Ride will be a key component of the planning area, supported by a high level of non -motorized facilities, amenities, and transit services that will reduce dependency on the automobile and provide transportation choices. Further information on the FWCC and its role in the City's development plans are found in Chapter 7 of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2002) and the City Center Planned Action EIS (Jones and Stokes, Incorporated, 2005). Site Location Figure 1 illustrates the FWCC planning area for this analysis. The planning area, the subject of this analysis, is a subset of the area designated in the City Center Core and Frame (2002 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7), which included areas west and east of the planning area. The study area analyzed represents the area surrounding the new FWCC transit center, the focal point of the area's development. The planning area is centered along both sides of S 320 Street and 20 Avenue S, forming three distinct blocks areas that include the Hillside Plaza shopping area and school district offices, SeaTac Plaza and SeaTac Village, and the Commons at Federal Way (formerly the SeaTac Mall). The boundaries of the planning area are S 312 Street (north), S 324 Street (south), Pacific Highway S/SR-99 (west) and 23 Avenue S (east). The area is divided into three blocks to allow the detailed analysis of land uses and future development. • Block 1 consists of the northern portion of the project area and is bounded on the north by S 312 Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by South 316 Street and on the east by 23 Avenue S. Block 2 is located in the central portion of the project area and is bounded on the north by S 316 Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by S 320 Street and on the east by 23 Avenue S. • Block 3 is located in the southern portion of the project area and consists mainly of The Commons at Federal Way (formerly SeaTac Mall). Block 3 is bounded on the north by S 320 Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by S 324 Street and on the east by 23 Avenue S. Mirai Transportation 2 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis ncn �nae r- •y �# � _ zH ry s G Y J �f '1 1 r ll 1 1 TFdw I 1 ' Lw r r r r r 1 x. k 1 1 l � 1 1 Soume: Parcels: King County GIS ,I Block Boundaries with Blodc Number A N 300 0 A 3W boo Feet State 1" - 600 Feet MY OF Figure 1. Location Map Federal Way 6/20/2006 3 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Land Use The existing land uses are primarily retail and service businesses. As the principal retail center of Federal Way, the area includes many of the City's main shopping areas including: The Commons at Federal Way (SeaTac Mall), SeaTac Village, Center Plaza, SeaTac Plaza, and Hillside Plaza. Principal retailers in the area include Sears, Bon- Macy's, Target, and Wal-Mart. Other activities in the area include hotels, office space, and a variety restaurants and eateries. Table 1 describes the make up of the FWCC. The existing land uses within the City Center include a mix of office, retail, and other uses, with little residential development. Much of the remaining area is devoted to surface parking. Block 1 538,224 sf 190 units -- Block 2 500,221 sf N/A 230 rooms Block 3 850,469 sf N/A -- Total 1,888,914 sf 190 units 230 rooms Source: Federal Way City Center Planned Action EIS, Jones and Stokes, Inc. 2005. Referencing King County, WA. Parcel Viewer, Accessed 12-18-2003. Proposed Land Use The FWCC is proposed as a mixed -use development that will provide the variety of land uses needed to create an urban center within the City of Federal Way. Table 2 describes the assumed mix of land uses applied in this analysis for each of the three block areas. The two action alternatives assume the same amount of intensified development within the FWCC area, but differ in the location of growth throughout the planning area. Alternative 1 would concentrate development near S 320 Street (Blocks 2 and 3), while Alternative 2 would distribute the growth throughout FWCC plan area. The No Action alternative (Alternative 3) assumes only the future growth identified in the Chapter 7 of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2002). Mirai Transportation 4 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Table 2. ment 2004-2009 Retail (sf) 34,395 41,697 34,041 67,500 202,500 180,000 153,000 153,000 144,000 Office (sf) 20,554 17,128 6,859 37,500 112,500 60,000 81,000 81,000 48,000 Lodging 0 0 0 60 180 120 132 132 96 (rooms) Residential 23 31 31 75 225 150 165 165 120 (units) Civic (sf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other (sf) 3,664 3,022 1.210 0 0 0 0 0 0 Structured Parking 0 0 0 0 150 300 175 0 240 (stalls) Source: Federal Way City Center Planned Action EIS, Jones & Stokes, Incorporated, 2005. Table 3 lists the amount of expected development for each alternative within the FWCC between 2010 and 2014. Overall growth for the action alternatives (Alternative 1 and 2) is identical with Alternative 1 concentrating the growth in Blocks 1 and 2 and Alternative 2 balancing the growth between the three blocks. Table 3. Proposed Development 2010-2014 Retail (sf) 22,602 27,400 22,371 45,000 135,000 120,000 102,000 102,000 96,000 Office (sf) 23,962 19,982 8,002 25,000 75,000 40,000 54,000 54,000 32,000 Lodging 0 0 0 40 120 80 88 88 64 (rooms) Residential 28 39 34 50 150 100 110 110 80 (units) Civic (sf) 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 Other (so 4,275 3,526 1,412 0 0 0 0 0 0 Structured Parking 0 0 0 0 100 200 0 175 160 (stalls) Source: Federal Way City Center Planned Action EIS, Jones & Stokes, Incorporated, 2005. Each of these land use alternatives were assigned to the City of Federal Way's Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZs) for the development of the traffic forecasting model in EMME/2. The land use, zone structure map, and the assumptions used in the traffic modeling are located in the Technical Appendix B. 6/20/2006 5 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Approved Projects in the Vicinity The TIA includes the expected impacts of approved projects in the vicinity of the FWCC area as part of the baseline assumptions to the traffic model. Three projects were identified for inclusion in the scope of work: The Christian Faith Center, a recently approved development of a church and school on S 336th Street between Highway 99 and Interstate 5, will include a 4,500-seat sanctuary/auditorium, with meeting spaces, a bookstore, and offices; and a school building with recreation facilities and play fields. The Federal Way Transit Center was assumed as part of the baseline model assumptions along with the S 317 Street transit/HOV ramps that connect to 1-5. The final project, the "Triangle Study" was not complete at the time of this report. The study is primarily designed to improve safety and efficiency of the area where of Interstate-5, SR-18, SR 161 interact with S 348 Street in Federal Way. Scope of Impact Analysis The TIA describes the impacts of the existing and future transportation system. The existing analysis describes area traffic volumes, traffic operations, traffic safety, and transit service for the AM, PM and Saturday peak hours. The future conditions analysis includes the cumulative impacts of traffic increases associated with the each alternative, general traffic growth (background traffic) and traffic associated with other development projects and improvements. The future year analysis also assumes the completion of projects within the City of Federal Way's 2005-2010 6-year TIP. Appendix A includes the scope of work for the project. Study Intersections Under the City's direction a two-tier process was used to identify the scope of the study intersections for the FWCC analysis. The first tier of this analysis followed the procedure described in the City of Federal Way's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses (June 2004). The first tier includes existing and future transportation facilities affected by 10 or more trips in both directions during the evening PM peak hour and 100 or more trips during other the AM and Saturday peak hours. Appendix C provides the results of this analysis. The second tier reviewed the results from the level of service and the volume -to -capacity ratio analyses conducted for the intersections identified in the first tier to identify the existing and future locations likely to exceed the City's minimum acceptable level of service standard (LOS E or better with a volume/capacity ratio of less than 1.00 for signalized intersections). Additional intersections were added by the consultant as a result of refinements to the traffic model and at the direction of the City staff. Table 4 lists the study intersections within the area. A total of 27 intersections analyzed for existing (2004) and future (2009). The AM peak hour analyzed 10 intersections, the PM peak hour analyzed 22 intersections, and the Saturday peak hour analyzed 14 Mirai Transportation 6 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis intersections. These intersections were analyzed for existing and future conditions to describe the impact of the FWCC plan on the transportation system. Throughout this document the results of the PM peak hour analysis are reported first, the AM peak hour second, and Saturday peak hour last. Table 4. Stud Intersections S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S (City of Kent) X X X S 272 St & 1-5 SB southbound_Ramp (WSDOT) X X X S 272 St & 1-5 NB northbound Ramp (WSDOT) X X X S 272 St & Military Rd S (City of Kent) X X X S 288th St & Pacific Hwy S X S 288th St & Military Rd S X S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S X S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S X X S312St&28AvS - X S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S X SW 320 St & 21 Av SW X S320St&1 AvS X X X S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S a �, Y• Wiw_ x _ S320St&20AvS i, X S320St&23AvS X S 320 St & 1-5 SB southbound Ramp (WSDOT) iow—k-om X S 320 St & 1-5 NB northbound Ramp (WSDOT) �_ X S 320 St & Military Rd S (Unincorporated King County) X S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S X ]f SW 336 St & 21 Av SW X S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S X X IN Ir' AM SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW X X 1 X SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S X S 348 St & Pacific Hwy S X f SW 356 St&21 Av SW X S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S X S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S X Number of Intersections Analyzed 22 10 14 Definition of Impact The City of Federal Way follows the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology to calculate the impact of a project on area intersections. Level of Service (LOS) is a measure of the quality of traffic operations at an intersection. LOS uses an A to F scale, with LOS A representing minimal traffic delays and LOS F representing severe 6/20/2006 7 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis congestion and long delays. The LOS is measured using the average control delay of the intersection and is reported for the overall intersection for signalized intersections and all -way stops, and for the worst movement of unsignalized intersections. Table 5 describes the LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Table 5. Level of Service Definitions A s� 0-10 .. 0-10 B > 10-20 > 10-15 C >20-35 > 15-25 D >35-55 >25-35 E >55-80 >35-50 F >80 >50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000, Transportation Research Board) The HCM methodology also calculates volume to capacity ratio to express the extent an intersection is below or above its theoretic capacity. The HCM methodology uses the volume to capacity of the critical movements of the intersection to provide an overall v/c measure (Xc). The City of Federal Way's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses establishes analysis thresholds to define an impact requiring mitigation. The City uses a combined threshold that defines an impact as: (1) intersections operating at worse than LOS E for signalized and all -way stop controlled intersections and/or (2) an overall volume/capacity ratio (Xc) of equal to or greater than 1.0, as calculated by the Highway Capacity Manual methodology. For unsignalized intersections other than all - way stops, an impact occurs when the lane volume/capacity ratio for any lane group must is equal to or greater than the 1.0 standard. Inventory of Existing and Planned Transportation System This section describes the existing and planned major transportation systems within the planning area, including the roadway system, traffic volumes, intersection operations, collision data, transit services, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Roadway Facilities The main component of the transportation system is the roadway system. This section describes the base year (2004) roadway system including the functional classification, system description, right-of-way, traffic volumes, intersection operations (level of service), and collision history. Mirai Transportation 8 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Functional Classification Figure 2 shows the functional classification of the Federal Way arterial system within the planning area. Table 6 describes the general definition of the functional classification found in Chapter 3 of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision). Table 6. Characteristics of Functional Classifications of Streets Interst to a/Freeways 4+ (varies) Varies — 60 mph 30,000+ Principal Arterial 2 to 7 68' to 124' 35-50 mph 5,000+ Minor Arterial 2 to 5 68' to 106' jL 30-40 mph 5,000-35,000 Principal Collector 2 to 5 68' to 100' Jj 25-35 mph 5,000-25,000 Minor Collector 2 to 3 60'to 80'AA[ 25-35 mph 1,000-5,000 Local Street 2 36' to 66' 25-35 mph up to 1,000 Source: Federal Way City Center Comprehensive Plan 2003 revision (Chapter 3), page 111-30. System Description The City of Federal Way roadway system serves both local and regional roles providing access to residents and businesses as well as connections to adjacent and regional destinations. Primary roadways and intersections within the planning area are described below: ■ Interstate 5 is the primary north -south interstate freeway in western Washington. 1-5 has five travel lanes north of S 320 Street and four lanes south of S 320 Street, with a posted speed limit of 60 mph. Study intersections connecting with the 1-5 ramps include the northbound and southbound ramps at S 320 Street, the S 317 Street direct access ramps and at S 272 Street. Pacific Highway S. (SR-99) is a five to seven lane principal arterial connecting i Federal Way with the City of Tacoma to the south and the City of Kent to the north. The posted speed limit is 40 mph. Study intersections along SR-99 include S 272 Street, S Dash Point Rd, S 312 Street, S 316 Street, S 320 Street, S 324 Street, S 336 Street, S 348 Street, and S 356 Street. a 6/20/2006 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION ► OF EXISTING AND PLANNED ~ �~ STREETS AND HIGHWAYS Puget Sound �" f � TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT �►I�f f�Federal Way City Urnits Potential Annexation Area } 4^1 Freeway 000'V Principal Arterial LPPrincipal Collector Ron A1**V Minor Arterial "WA Minor Collector I I £ --SCALE -- ;4 1 Inch equals 5,800 Feet y. Federal Way M.+u vered,lir.c 2oan+::.,r.t7n.�r.��n��r.lcr�.+csn���xc:.v s.a:t _.��•_� CM or 1 Figure 2. Functional Classification Federal Way E pl,s� p Mirai Transportation 10 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis • S 272 Street a principal arterial that connects Pacific Highway S to Interstate 5 and SR-516. Study intersections along S 272 include Pacific Highway S, 1-5 ramps, and Military Road S. • S 320 Street is a principal arterial with 5 to 7 travel lanes. The roadway connects 1-5 with SR-99 to the west and Military Road/Peasley Canyon Road to the east. Study intersections along S 320 Street include 1 Avenue S, Pacific Highway S, 21 Avenue S, 23 Avenue S, 1-5 ramps, and Military Road. ■ S 356th Street is a principal arterial that provides a connection between the City of Tacoma and 1-5 and SR-18. Study intersection on S 356th Street includes 21 st Avenue SW, Pacific Highway S, and Enchanted Parkway S. Right -of -Way The Federal Way Municipal Code (Section 13-161.11) describes right-of-way as "...dedicated or conveyed to the public or a unit of government, the primary purpose of which is the movement of vehicles and/or pedestrians and providing for access to adjacent parcels, with the secondary purpose of providing space for utility lines and appurtenances and other devices and facilities benefiting the public." The Chapter 3 (Figure III-3) of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision) develops a network of "City Center" roadways that meet the higher level of amenities for the FWCC planning area (Figure 3). The need for wider sidewalks, bicycle lanes, street lighting, and street trees resulted in the City designating specific standards for FWCC roadways. Table 7 lists the required and the typical amounts of right-of-way found on major roadways within the FWCC planning area. Pacific Highway S. (SR-99) 120 feet 100-140 feet S 324 Street 96 feet 66 feet S 320 Street 100 feet 100-140 feet S 316 Street 74 feet 60 feet S 312 Street 85 feet 60-85 feet 20 Avenue S 60 feet 60 feet 23 Avenue S 85 feet 80-82 feet Source: King County Assessor 2003 As seen in the table, Pacific Highway S, S 324 Street, S 316 Street, S 312 Street and 23 Avenue S all have inadequate right-of-way. In addition, the FWCC Pan calls for a number of internal roadways (see Figure 10) to create smaller blocks that will improve the grid network and improve the access for pedestrians and vehicles. These internal grid roads noted as Q in Figure 3 require 70 feet of Right of Way with two vehicle lanes, 12 feet of sidewalks, and on street parking. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements shall be a component of the development submittal phase of a proposed project within the FWCC. 6/20/2006 11 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis nLiora a P' o o QdApb T u [bqp e p � 600ao g dI -el �3 aA� LI` •ri i C� a Q? 0.0 Ei d C , o n g03 o°` o, A�iifA J6i-w 4.41.1 MEWS ea6taa uocPoov ', TOP moo° 0 A C 1 L J LS EFF 0 - 4r Fr_ D f/� E3 r_-3Q flQ , Celiil � � 1 !• 0 _ drr� ay G�d`I � J Ross 3 1 1 ngDW �� ec Mall 1 � LJ CO 1 1 CIA FWCC Planned Street Section Code 13 A = 4 lanes + HOV B = 4 lanes + HOV (City Center) G = 5 lanes + Bike (City Center) J = 5 lanes (City Center) L = 3 lanes + Bike (City Center) Q = 2 lanes + Parking (City Center Grid Roads) Tiegp � iid by ao ■runtlM. �M Y ink • aapNanpw�tidaa MY OF A Federal Way Q� One-way transit road zi KUp Date: February. 2000. N a 500 100 Feat Festal Way Figure 3. Proposed FWCC Street �-- Network T�anaPo���:on PlonnlnB s Enoinee.-inp Mirai Transportation 12 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Base Year (2004) Volumes Recent traffic counts were used to establish the 2003-04 base year traffic volumes for the study (for purposes of the study, 2004 and 2003 volumes were assumed to be identical since the city performed the 2003 counts in November and December of 2003.). Traffic counts from the City's database were supplemented by additional counts conducted in late-2003 through the summer of 2004. For all counts, the reported peak hour represents the highest single peak hour traffic count taken over a two-hour period. Appendix D summarizes the traffic counts used in this study. Based on observations of historical traffic volumes and discussions with City Staff, traffic counts that were older than 2003, were factored using a historical rate to approximate 2004 count levels. For PM counts, a TGR of 2.5% per year for 2001 counts and a TGR of 1.1 % per year for 2002 counts were used to factor counts to 2004. For AM and Saturday counts, a 2% per year TGR was used. The observed peak hour for the three time periods occur between the following hours: PM peak hour between 4 and 6 p.m. A AM peak hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • Saturday peak hour between 11 a.m. and 1 p.m. Figures 4 to 6 display the 2004 PM, AM and Saturday peak hour traffic counts. 6/20/2006 13 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis S 21Y2nd St PM Peak Hour Study Intersections ; ' r... 2 4 S 308th St. d 1�53tnt�,stg sin 3121h S N 3 If ` Sw 320th St 12 13 n 16 1$.. 19 S S 324ih at. xco . 20 336th S 21 , 22 u] SW 340th St s�e� A. 23 P4 S 348th St i --! L Tr 25 _ 1113581h. _ 28 27 . (P; 1 pra Figure 4. Existing PM Volumes Federal Way T.- n ���^ E., .0 x� Mirai Transportation 14 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis S, 272 St & Pacific Hwy S N ;S, 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramp a •S, 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp S, 272 St & AM7itary Rd S N m S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S m r m m m m � � t•J 4A94 m m m N m 4A94 P 4 0 43 1 16 o rn a �� r 4A94 N m m a � N 4A14 93 J 358 •+ L 55 O �. 406 0 J 798 r L O t 0 479 412 J 1270 -0 L { 3 } +� 362 569 178 1 650 -* /�^, L � . 68 956 34 J 25 - L O t• 182 20 109 S ! 604 248 S s 241 0 S �� ! 0 450 'S ! 267 25 S ! 364 �tr �tr 'rtr tr ate m a 2 � N W CJ ONl N S 288 St & Military Rd S n m m S!Dadv 312 St & Pad9c Hwy S v o 0 S 312 St & 28 AV S 0 - .. ,. _.: 3r S .+ 4 4 J a ta. .+ a 4 .+ a 4 a l �. 103 J L 116 ./ i1. 271 J L 143 325 J L 0 J L 215 ! O ~ 330 •+ 7 378 -0$ 4- 416 0 -* 9 r 0 124 S ! 242 ! 119 S ! 154 23 S ! 0 K F 411 '!tr 01 41t10 +ltlw m m m _'N 2Q i 21 SVV320St&l AvS rn o a S Z20 St & Paullc Hwy S N m m AV t Av m rn *1SJ6 da4 dl4 dY4 dl4 JS !. 119 J L 162 413 J L 294 J L 90 J L 245 4" 662 12 1048 884 •0 13 1022 f w 14 w 1106 -0 15 4- 1465 S! 129 S ! 300 95 S ! 324 '+< 35 S ! 303 �tr �tr �tr titr atr N V t7 r - a S 3 t I-o aB =,i2J Ramp 0 at - 1- amp btu Si a rvaary Rd rn m m 324 I Pacific Hwy b 0 m a q"%, 336 S. & 2'• v SVv 0 d 44 42116 m m r N �- .A 94 m o m a � � 41 1 4 m a m � m N .A 94 0 & L 0 J L 187 L 178 72! L 57 249 J L 29319 6 424 1056 931 186 •0 4.191530 19 9 572 :20) 653 163 208 S 216 208 S ! 340 116 S ! 264 atr Rtr atr 41tr 41tr m m m o a 5 336 St & Pacific Hwy 5 m m SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd 1SW m f• SVV Campus Dr & f v O N a 6 348 St & Pacific Hwy 5 f�] r SW 356 St & 21 Av SW N m N d 1116 r• d a 4 m a d a 4 t0 O� d 1 4 m 0 d 9 4 390 J L 36 J L 78 162 J L. 183 113 J L 114 430 J L 205 435 •'� 21 333 620 725 2$ 4• 1309 1006 -024 4- 1445 400 25 4- 639 417 S ! 100 S ! 266 103 S ! 222 183 S ! 426 0 S ! 0 atr 01tr �tr �tr atr m o rn rn N r- r S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S 00 S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S N .114 d l4 140 J L 21 205 J L 16 229 26 302 13 2] 17 285 S ! 111 227 S s' 26 atr �tr N m o ta1Y A. Federal Way Figure 4. Existing PM Volumes T.-w....... i-- Pi.nnina 6 Er,a�•,ee.-ir,o 6/20/2006 15 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis CITVCW Figure 5. Existing AM Volumes INA Federal Way Mirai Transportation 16 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis I5. 272 Sl & Pacific Hwy S S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramp S. 272 Sl & 1-5 NB Ramp S. 272 St & Military Rd S 'S 29Wific Hwy S 4A .114 4.11114 .114 4914 11, 264 '� « 211 1097 2 r. 384 O 631 � $ « 37777 0 584 - D 4- 681126 7 r 193 234 7 r 228 0 7 r 0 109 -4r 109 it 01t1* 41110 4Itr 41tr Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S S 316 Sl & Pacific Hwy S d 1 4 r rn 0 N t7 O .1 1 4 411 441 916 411 4 ! L « 8 4-0 E) 813 l t.0 � 7 «. . ! L . g « ! 6 « g « ! L 4 145 s r G *1t90 '� tr 0 9t1' 01t10 41tIr SW 320 St & 21 Av S SW 320 St & 1 Av S S 320 St $ Pack Hwy S S 320 St & 20 Av S S 320 St & 23 Av S m � v .I 1 16 41 916 41 1 4 41 1 4 334 l L 23 709 233 241 1 L 67 1006 . j 2 t 6 7 ! t.! .0 is « :. '* 14 « -.tL • 5 « Z r 204 s r 123 7 r 7 r 4 r 114 88 �1 tr '1 t�' 4 tr 41 it so 41 tr S 320 St & 1-5 SB -320 Ramp S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 320 St & Military Rd S 5 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 'SW 336 St & 21 AV SW m 41 1 4 .1 1 4 41 1 16 41 1 4 41 l 16 O 1 L 0 1350 � � t. 946 ! L '� ] a' ! L $ « ! ti $ « ! f y « 444 s r 183 's a. 7 r Is r 7 r v a o 'Itto it No '11r �1tr S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd S W SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S S 348 St & Pacific Hwy S SW 366 5i& 21 Av nV o � � d 14 41 14 41 S. b 41 i 4 100 1 L 61 335 '� ai 327 75 .969 22 L 51 563 142 ! L -0 23 'I"- .06 ZQ « ! L » �§ « 'S r 55 174 s r 75 '� r 7 r 7 r 169 atr atr 41tr 41t1r 41tr t & Pacific wy S 356 St & En 41ar da4 s r s r 41 41 t 1► 1` Figure 5. Existing AM Volumes I■►'Ee fllY6r Federal Way Er, - 6/20/2006 17 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis nn of Federal Way Figure 6. Existing Saturday Volumes ` Tro.,apo Plmn- 6 Eno.,ee�no Mirai Transportation 18 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering 272 St & Pacific Hwy S r m .+ 1 4 107 j L 110 364— 1 t317 107 s r 367 SW 320 St & 21 Av S 11 41141 ! s 1! s �tM 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramp m � � N .1 1 4 0 j L 0 811 403 270 4 r 148 its o 0 0 Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy ! s s r 01tup 320 St & 1 Av S r I m 41 1 4 110 d L 124 1020 12 970 108 4 r 360 41 a v Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp 4.11 1 4 452 j `^, L 393 600 358 0 s r a 41ts �2 aN M v w N 225 l L 135 358 - $ 4- 472 107 7 r 205 tits 320 St & Pacific Hwy S m o � M a m M d 1 4 589 l �\ L 268 1055 13 945 54 s J\ r 454 LU 61 & I-5 bb -JLU (tamp 0 N a JLU J[ N JLU - 1-0 IV[3 Namp 0 JGU JI It IVll lllal� I 4A14 .J14 all 14 O l L 0 O lSL 113 t ! L 1838 '� s 1487 1065 1025 '� g623 7 r 149 903 sr 0 .110r tits 0 o a tits a N m N atr City OF Federal Way 6/20/2006 340 S1&Hoyt Rd SW N SW Campus Or&1 Av5 m N 01 r � � .+14 41i4 72 ! L 70 ! L 508 22 «' 343 r Z$ 125 Z r 188 7 ats o m atM 272 St & MilitaryTRIm082 1 ! L491O j $ }zez s s �� r ats �tM .1♦b v � .- d14 ! L 111 ! L 138 y 9 144 10 119 7 s 232 s r 239 491P tits � o 0 om 320 S1 & 20 Av S 13 320 St & 23 Av S 4A 14 v v 4A 14 500 1 L 356 179 1S L 349 1215 � 1 Q 4 1292 1486 -t 1862 131 '4r 366 67 '4r 469 tits ats g2 324 St & Pacific Hwy S m .+ 14 d 14 - 12, 1 L 73 ! L s 1s1 1g zz7 2a 125 s r 249 7 ! tits maw m n N of N � �tr �ac B St & 21 Av S W 4114 *114 « » « 21 x5 s s 1 s 1tM 41tIP Figure 6. Existing Saturday Volumes 19 E., Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Existing Traffic Operations Analysis of the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours used the Synchro 6.0 analysis software to report the Highway Capacity Manual intersection operations for each study intersection. The City considers intersections to be operating at an acceptable LOS if operations are LOS E or better and its v/c ratios are less than 1.0 for the critical movements of the intersection. Table 8 lists the existing LOS operation for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hour for each of the study intersections applicable to that period. The reported intersection operations use existing signal timing and phasing plans as identified by the City of Federal Way. Optimizing the signal phasing and timing could improve the LOS and v/c results. Appendix E contains the 2004 HCM intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Table 8. 2004 Intersection Operations PM Peak,Intersection AM Peak, PM Peak • • 1. S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S F 1.29 E 2. S 272 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp 3. S 272 St & 1-5 northbound Ramp 4. S 272 St & Military Rd S 5. S 288th St & Pacific Hwy S 6. S 288th St & Military Rd S 7. S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 8. S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 9. S312St&28AvS 10. S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 11. SW 320 St & 21 Av SW 12. SW 320 St & 1 Av S E 1.07 C C 0.97 E F 1.26 F D 0.89 D 0.74 C E 0.92 C 0.673 .. !ak Saturday Peak V/C LOS I V/C 1.01 E 0.97 0.85 C 0.69 1.13 C 0.72 1.22 D 0.76 0.47 _ E 0.93,U r-F E 1.00 F 1.06 E 1.01 F1.18 13. S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.79 ff[ D _jf 0.92 14. S 320 St & 20 Av S J& Fij 1.76 15. S 320 St & 23 Av S C 0.85 j, FMj 1.09 16. S 320 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp C 0.92 C 1 0.74 D 0.99 17. S 320 St & 1-5 northbound Rampr� C 0.75 18. S 320 St & Military Rd S D 19. S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.68 D 0.88 20. SW 336 St & 21 Av SW E 0.94-- 21. S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S E 1, 1.15 D 0.70 ^�� 22. SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW C I]`, 0.85 B 0.63 19 0.62 23. SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S E r 1.05-�' _IF 24. S 348 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.92--- 25. SW 356 St & 21 Av SW C - 0.75-��- 26. S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.89-� 27. S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S D 0.78 'LOS reflects the overall operation of the intersection based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 methodology 2VIC is the combined volume%apacity of the critical movements of the intersection as identified as the Xc in the HCM 2000 methodology 3Maximum v/c ratio at all -way stop -controlled unsignalized intersection Mirai Transportation 20 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis PM Peak Hour Deficiencies — Six intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2004. These intersections either operate at worse than LOS E and/or have a volume to capacity ratio equal to or higher than 1.00. Three of the deficient intersections are located along S 272 Street along the border with the City of Kent. Other deficient intersection locations include SW 320 Street & 1 Avenue S, S 336 St & Pacific Highway S, and SW Campus Drive & 1 Avenue S. AM Peak Hour Deficiencies — Five of the study intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2004. These intersections either operate at worse than LOS E and/or have a volume to capacity ratio equal to or higher than 1.00. The areas with the deficient locations include the S 272 Street corridor at the intersections at the 1-5 northbound ramp, 1-5 southbound ramp, and Military Road S, and the S 320 Street corridor at the intersections of 1 Avenue S and 21 Avenue SW. Saturday Peak Hour Deficiencies — Four of the Saturday study intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2004. These intersections either operate at worse than LOS E and/or have a volume to capacity ratio equal to or higher than 1.00. These intersections are concentrated around the FWCC area at intersections along Pacific i Highway S and S 320 Street. Weekend retail activity at these locations is likely to contribute to the high traffic at these intersections. Parking The existing number of parking stalls reflects the more auto -oriented development pattern of the current land uses. Table 9 describes the number of existing parking spaces in the Federal Way City Center area. Using the three blocks described in Figure 1, Block 1 has 2,960 spaces, Block 2 has 2,760 spaces, and Block 3 has 3,240 for a total of 8,960 spaces. Table 9. Existing Parkin Su I b Block Area Block 1 2,960 stalls Block 2 2,760 stalls Block 3 3,240 stalls -s Total 8,960 stalls Source: Jones and Stokes Associates. Table 10 describes the number of spaces City Code requires for each existing land use. Approximately 5,900 stalls are required under the parking requirements. When compared with the existing parking supply, there are approximately 3,000 extra parking spaces than required by City standards. 6/20/2006 21 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Table 10. Existin Rarking Re uirements RequirementParking Code Existing Development Required Park Civic Uses Case by case 0 sf 0 stalls Hotel 1 per room 230 rooms 230 stalls Office 1 per 300 sf 344,610 sf 1,149 stalls Other (1) 1 per 1000 sf 14,400 sf 15 stalls Residential 1.7 per unit 190 units, �'I 323 stalls Retail 1 per 300 sf 1,268,000 sf 4,227 stalls Totals 5,944 stalls Source: Jones and Stokes Associates. (1) Parking for Other land use assumed at 1 per 1000 sf. Collision Data Review of historical collision data provides an indication of the location and severity of incidents at intersections and along corridors. Historical analysis is useful in understanding the typical types of collisions that occur at a particular location; however, the data may not be indicative of future collision rates or causes. A number of factors can contribute to collisions including: • Traffic congestion (ability to maneuver) • Driver skills (driver age and experience) • Driver behavior (speeding, aggressiveness, driving while intoxicated) • Roadway geometrics (sight distance) • Weather conditions (rain, glare, snow) • Nature (animals, fallen trees) Vehicle condition, equipment and maintenance (brakes, tires) • Roadway condition (pavement condition) Three years (2000-2002) of collision data were analyzed to identify overall trends within Federal Way. Appendix F summarizes the collision data for study intersections and for corridors. High Collision Locations Rate The City requires the identification of high collision locations, both for corridors and individual intersections. The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (June 24, 2004 - Page 5) define high collision locations as follows: - A collision rate of more than 1.0 collisions per million entering vehicles at an intersection. Mirai Transportation 22 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis ■ A collision rate of more than 10.0 collisions per million vehicle miles on a roadway segment. Table 11 identifies the study intersections that exceed the 1.0 collision per million entering vehicles. Eighteen of the 32 intersections exceed the 1.0 collision per million entering vehicles. The highest location is at Military Road S / S 288 Street that averaged 2.38 collisions per million entering vehicles between 2000 and 2002. Table 12 identifies the roadway corridors that exceed the City's standard of 10.0 collisions per million vehicle miles on a roadway segment. All but one of the study corridors exceeds the 10.0 collisions per million vehicle mile standard. The City of Federal Way, in general, attributes the majority of collisions to congestion at roadways and intersections (City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, 2003 revision, Page III-7). The congestion related delay at intersections can result in driver risk -taking in order to attempt to reduce wait times. Improving vehicle mobility, reducing conflict points, and reducing vehicle delay may reduce some types of collision along the corridor. The City traffic engineering department monitors collision data and corrects roadway and intersection issues that could contribute to higher collision rates at specific locations. Table 11. 2000-2002 Intersection Collision Rates intersection Military Rd S / S 288 St 82 2.38 SR99/S312St - 122 2.25 SR 99 / S 348 St -JJW 137 2.14 SR 99 / S 272 St 113 1.88 SW 336 St / 21 Av SW 87 1.73 SR 99 / S 320 St 149 1.72 SR 99 / S 316 St 75 1.63 SR161/SR18 136 1.54 Hoyt Rd SW / SW 340 St 31 M L 1.44 SR 99 / S 288 St 79 =10 1.42 S 320 St / southbound 1-5 Ramps 84 j 1.42 SR 99 / S 324 St 76 1.37 SR 99 / S 304 St 58 1.34 S 320 St / 20 Ave S 69 1.29 SR 99 / S Dash Point Rd 61 1.25 S 320 St / 23 Ave S 88 1.22 SR 99 / S 336 St 64 1.1 S 356 St / 21 Av SW 37 1.01 6/20/2006 23 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Table 12. 2000-2002 Corridor Collision Rates S 348 St (SR 99 to 16 Avenue S) 332 0.21 37.09 S 288 St (SR 99 to Military Road S) 241 0.52 36.56 S 272 St (SR 99 to Military Road S) 492 1 24.3 S 312 St (SR 99 to 28 Avenue S) 229 0.75 24.16 SR 99 (S 272 Street to S 356 Street) 2496 5.24 16.57 S 320 St (SR 99 to Military Road S) 837 1.4 14.06 S 304 St (SR 99 to Military Road S) 88 0.79 11.64 Military Rd (S 272 Street to S 328 Street) 407 3.83 7.2 Future Conditions Analysis This section describes the methodology and assumptions used to forecast the 2009 and 2014 horizon years used in this analysis. The future forecasts include assumed traffic growth rates, changes to the roadway network, and planned major developments that affect the FWCC and study intersections. Forecasting Model Development Forecasts of future growth for the PM peak hour used an updated version of the City's 2002 EMME/2 traffic forecasting model to determine the future traffic volumes on area roadways and at the study intersections. The PM peak hour EMME/2 model was calibrated using updated traffic information including traffic counts, an expanded analysis zone system, and changes in the roadway network. Traffic counts were updated to bring counts to the 2003/2004 base year. The model was expanded from a 220-zone to a 250-zone system to include potential annexation areas of the City. Other street network and land use changes were also incorporated to bring the model up to 2004 conditions. Appendix B includes the model validation results. For the PM peak hour, the EMME/2 model forecasts the expected PM Peak hour traffic levels based the trip generation and assignment for each of the three land use alternatives. Table 13. Assumed Annual Traffic Growth Rates 2004-2009 Analysis Period AnnUal Growth Rate PM Peak Hour 0.0% to 6.1 % FWCC EMME/2 Traffic Model AM Peak Hour 1.5% City of Federal Way Saturday Peak Hour 1.1.% City of Federal Way Mirai Transportation 24 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis For the PM peak hour, the average traffic growth rate along study intersection approaches is 3.3% per year with a range within one standard deviation of 0.8% to 5.7%. For the AM peak hour, the City requested the application of a 1.5% background growth rate to approximate the expected growth between 2004 and 2009 and a 1.1 % growth rate for the Saturday peak hour. Roadway Improvements Assumptions Within the study area, there are a number of planned transportation improvements to increase roadway capacity and to improve mobility. The 2009 baseline forecasts assumes projects identified in the City of Federal Way's 2005-2010 Transportation Improvement Program (Table 14 and Figure 7) and two State Interchange improvements.2 The 2005-2010 TIP reflects improvements needed to meet the City's LOS threshold for operations. City staff develops an annual update of improvements that establishes the funding needs and priorities for the next six years. All TIP improvements at intersections and roadway locations were included in the model and the intersection analysis. Improvements listed in the 2005-2010 TIP include: • Adding HOV lanes • Installing raised median • Installing street illumination Extending roadways • Adding turn lanes • Installing traffic signal • Installing sidewalks Z The 2005-2010 TIP was assumed in the analysis of 2009 conditions. 6/20/2006 25 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis ipti on sis 324, 2nd northbound left -turn lane eft-tum lane and rechannelized and left -turn lane @ 288, install Redondo Way S with eft -turn lane on SR 99, install s and southbound left -turn lanes, 1 Ave S to 5 lanes to S 316 St walks, illumination ian, underground utilities, turn lanes, 2nd eastbound, nal modifications, extend Table 14. 2005-2010 Transportation Improvement Program • e Location escr 1 City Center Access Design Study, Environmental analy 2 SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase 2: S 324 St Add HOV lanes, left -turn lanes on - S 340 St @ 336, install raised median Add HOV lanes, 2nd southbound le 3 SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase 3: S 284 St westbound approach for 2"d westbo - SR 509 raised median, signal @ SR @ 509 interconnect to 11 PI S 4 S 348 St: 9 Ave S - SR 99 Add HOV lanes, 2nd northbound l raised median, underground utilitie 5 S 320 St @ 1 Ave S Add 2nd northbound, westbound, westbound right-tum lanes, widen 6 S 356 St: 1 Ave S - SR 99 Widen to 5 lanes, bike lanes, side 7 S 320 St: 8 Ave S - SR 99 Add HOV lanes, install raised med illumination 8 S 348 St @ 1 Ave S Add westbound, southbound right - westbound left -turn lanes 9 S 336 St @ 1 Wy S Add westbound right -turn lane, sig southbound left -turn lane 10 10 Ave SW / SW 344 Of SW Extend 3-lane collectors, sidewalks, street lights Campus Dr - 21 Ave SW 11 1 Ave S: S 320 St - S 330 St � Install raised median, improve access at 328"' 12 S 320 St @ 20 Ave S 'IJ Add 2nd left -turn lanes eastbound, westbound 13 21 Ave SW / SW 357 St: SW 356 St - Extend 2-lane collector, signal modifications 22nd Ave SW 14 SR 99 HOV Lanes Phase 4: SR 509 — Add HOV lanes, install raised median S 312 St 15 SR18@SR161 16 S336St@9Ave S 17 SW 312 St: 1 Ave S - SR 509 18 S 320 St @ 1-5 19 S 356 St: SR 99 - SR 161 20 S 304 St @ 28 Ave S 21 S 352nd St: SR 99 - SR 161 22 SW 320 St @ 21 Ave SW Add eastbound, westbound right -turn lanes, 3rd westbound left -turn lane, 2nd northbound right -turn lane, add 3rd lane on SR 161 southbound to S 352nd St Signal modifications Widen to 3 lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, street lights Add 2nd left -turn lane, 3rd right -turn lane on southbound off -ramp, widen S 320 St under crossing to 7 lanes. Widen to 5 lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, illumination Add northbound right -turn lane, signal Extend 3 lane principal collector and signal at SR-99 Interconnect to 26 Ave SW with the addition of a 2nd westbound left -turn lane 23 S 320 St: 1 Ave S - 8 Ave S � Add HOV lanes, install raised median Design phase 24 ilitary Rd S: S Star Lake Rd�8 Widen to 5 lanes, sidewalks, street lights St 25 SW 320 St @ 47 Ave SW � Install traffic signal 26 S 312 St @ 28 Ave S "� Add southbound right -turn lane 27 21 Ave S from S 318 St to S 320 St ;F Extends 2-lane grid street with on -street parking 28 SW 336 Wy / SW 340 St: 26 PI SW - Widen to 5 lanes Hoyt Rd 29 Westway Neighborhood Add Crime Prevention Street Lights through out the Neighborhood of Westway 30 S 314 St: 20 Ave S - 23rd Ave S Install sidewalks, ADA ramps, curbs & gutter, pedestrian improvements 31 1 Ave S: S 292nd St - S 312 St Shoulder improvements Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 26 6/20/2006 A 'CITY OF Federal Way Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis L City of Federal Way r 2005-2010 �" Transportation t r' Improvement Plan sue'""•`� �� �� Legend IMeeeCUm lffpv~ ^^` Camtlot Unpf04FfTk1Y k MW DO: SepO tff. 20ia L' !Mug Vft 8MAveS. gryd aUl �4/E 5. F Po BO><9715 1 ` Fed" way. VA 98Gf3 1253j635-7000 Federal Way • T+I Vi r:73: IS :rxCh}Yl�J CI '1:.VAT3"' � s i �.1 L F1'YdA' 3 t�~e37t f2.Y.'1�'Y.3Cq^ L Figure 7. 2005-2010 TIP no= �+ va.• .+�.len B 6/20/2006 27 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Transit Services Federal Way is served by a number of transit providers including King County Metro, Pierce County Transit, and Sound Transit. Figure 8 indicates the primary transit routes that serve the planning area. For more updated information on individual routes please visit the King County Web site at: http://transit.metrokc.gov/tops/bus/neighborhoods/federal way.html In the vicinity of the FWCC, there is frequent transit service with 23 routes serving the area during weekday hours with service as frequent four times per hour. Midday and Weekend service levels are lower. The hub of transit service is the Federal Way Transit Center and Garage located between S 316 Street and S 317 Street, west of 23 Avenue S. The transit center includes a HOV direct access ramp for bus and carpool access between the HOV lanes on 1-5 at S 317 Street. The new ramp allows buses and carpools to avoid the congested S 320 Street/ 1-5 interchange. The Transit Center serves the freeway -oriented bus routes King County Metro Routes 177,194, 197; and Sound Transit Routes 565, 574 and 577. Other transit routes at the Transit Center include King County Metro Routes 174, 181, 182, 183, 187, 565, 574, 577, 901, and 903 as well as Pierce Transit Routes 402, 500, and 501. The other major transit facility within the FWCC vicinity is the S. Federal Way Park & Ride facility at 23rd Ave S & S 323rd Street. Routes 173, 174, 177, 194, and 196 serve the park and ride facility. Other area park and ride facilities include the South Federal Way Park & Ride located on S 348th Street and the Twin Lakes Park and Ride lot located on SW 344th Street. The location and size of all area park and ride lots is shown Figure 9. Dart Services are provided on King County Metro routes 901 and 903 for weekday, Saturday and Sunday Service. Route 949 is Metro Boeing Service at the S. Federal Way Park & Ride 23rd Ave S & S 323rd Street. Mirai Transportation 28 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 174 ,a _ _ 1-15, KCM I 175n 7 174 177 181 1 901 > 182 183 187 -�u - -- 194 197 901 S L< ' I�r 'trw C) �'.' II 903 183" � �AIR $T 53 c 979 -. i Steel Lake n 194 �,� ley • � � b �l �r5 574 577 iII � 901 Park y 196 PT --� J 174 402 500 %I r'"'�` f 197 fier7�a �o o G 1 9 T I i ev norrs 1 j I 8�, rim=�� 183 }I 174 L.1 Jr � I 179 Q U t I fl I 181 S 2PQlk 179 rl .r i C+ sti4 n Q1877-2-:31 181� 1; 1 r, 197 err 187 U i'�`][!Tin r ,:903 903 110 } J� 4. L A _�a�a� , `173 ;�+} �Wlill '7 1 1, i 174 182 402 pWA 177 � a 2243 AT � I-- — 903 500 194, 1 ILI VO 7 �r fir'' � • •` r'} r • r rr! 4 500 ... brat i z / + - 565 ` P ul�lu.' 182 L!5 � �f 574 +h1M ranw Bounftry CW Center i® Park King County Metro Sound Transit Pierce Transit -k, [iTr Of Federal Way 6/20/2006 Figure 8. Existing Transit Services 29 w a mn tow rem I.= - - I' T.-a.,-ooruuon Pi -.,Wino s Enoln-- Inp Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis I / 272N0 N Z S 304TH ST 2 t} stalls S 3121 P-t ca 31 y 1 620 S 144TH ST an OF Federal Way S --72ND ST N W Q T ST S 23STN ST Pi 2GFTV! W a W ST r- �y m New Loop Ramp r a C y S E S 349TH Legend ® Number of Lanes 1990 ❑X Number of Lanes Today HOV Lanes and Ride Lots 1990 ®Park (with # stalls) Park and Ride Lots stalls Today(with # stalls) Figure 9. Park and Ride Lots Mirai Transportation 30 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Pedestrian Facilities Figure 10 shows the existing pedestrian facilities within the FWCC planning area. Sidewalks generally occur along both sides of the street system connecting retail areas with adjacent neighborhoods and parks. Major impediments to pedestrians include crossing of major roadways of substantial width and vehicle traffic, such as S 320 Street at Pacific Highway S. Additionally, existing large blocks with limited connections within the FWCC are determents to heavy pedestrian usage. Figure 12 illustrates conceptual locations for new sidewalks (along roadways) and crosswalk locations within the completed FWCC based on the 2002 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 7). The proposed street network would divide the area's large blocks with a new grid network that would increase pedestrian access and convenience within the FWCC and to surrounding areas. The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision, Chapter 3) includes roadway design standards specific to the FWCC to provide higher quality pedestrian facilities. These standards will require roadways to be constructed with 8-12 foot wide sidewalks, street lighting, and to provide street trees and other amenities such as benches and furniture. The plan also identifies potential pedestrian over crossing locations on S 320 Street and Pacific Highway S that would allow improved pedestrian access within the FWCC. Bicycle Facilities Figure 11 shows the existing bicycle facilities within and adjacent to the FWCC planning area. The facilities indicated vary from striped shoulder areas to marked bicycle lanes. Figure 12 indicates the planned bicycle network within the FWCC planning area. The network would develop bicycle lanes along S 316 Street, 20 Avenue S, S 324 Street and Gateway Boulevard connecting to the existing and future park and ride lot facilities, area parks, and the Bonneville Power Administration utility corridor trail. This level of development is assumed within the Comprehensive Plan for all three alternatives considered. 6/20/2006 31 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis OOi,•y.� - c� �� � � oA� � �Q Qen� a6 ----u p (b9Wq � o JJ. -r UO O 1P d o P p II Q Q IEloa� aD°c7 V. 0 a a� f3 a �� � d war4Earr Va3 (( El °f a 0 PamAbru fl s� ❑ I;$ 0. Canrre0 p e pSteel Lake QQQ 4�ec d6 �O 4iyLiO DO 1Rr0o rar+yaLd �(y ¢Ati7A g ❑ e [ seuQ f5 ��4A" 9—� ` •" Q f ��O B, f � � � � y � ri�RQv r o o D dn� ➢ CO coQ a 4^ — 1- [S Ross i Q Q �ac TMal! CO F--w ` r Nail L5DPar City Center Park a Sidewalks 2-sides Thb mar I. noaampuabd h no raru,nlMq aid b aYapll VaAIJa npmrfain Source: City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan - 2002 Map Date: ApAI. 2002, N a Sao t,aaa Feat STY a �� Figure 10. Existing Pedestrian Facilities Federal Way T-�- P. 6 Pe — Enane-�no Mirai Transportation 32 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis u N N City Center NEI Park " Striped Shoulder/Bicycle Lane -4k CITY OF Federal Way 6/20/2006 Mop Date: Apol. 2002. N a 500 1,000 Feat i I i 3 Figure 11. Existing Bicycle Facilities 33 Tronaporcac�on IPi.nnine s Enpineer�np Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis �1y�4 U a a � Qua a y iiaga fa ° a a � y Q F Q 0 n �p a eta � b R L3 Cl a ° ', o i� a V d 4 C3 1 1 o a 1 FROM --^�— p ° Cie Naxr�e �Q' Stael Lak t 1 U y Pat k dCadB �� &tm 1 f� a c¢OGJOGu;J4G p Q £ � � � C3 Vataca�vodr+�4� , , Y DIU ,;Yrr3C113 "I' 'Fr+ a L U j Pka fl ►� 4 ]�❑�� as ❑� �- Ras '� qcc Y ■ M' +0 r f jj � �� � ■r r w ' as w,r w rrw I y Pirr i Qu C=ag© New Transit Center Potential Bike Roote e� Potendd PedesMan City Center Core Crosslings (� City Center Frame Existing Street L Park Proposed Street nrwn r.wp.fiel bw wnaAw°tl r mow. war uowufra Source: City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan - 2002 O"Cr,( Federal Way MM Doe: FdxuM. 2M N 0 SM 1,MG Feet �+�i Figure 12. Future Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Mirai Transportation 34 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Impacts of Alternatives - 2009 This section documents the impact of the FWCC alternatives on the surrounding roadway network and at study intersections. The section describes the number of trips associated with the development of the FWCC (Trip Generation), assigns the traffic to the street network (trip distribution and assignment), and assesses the impact of the project alternatives on intersection operations, traffic safety, pedestrian and bicycle systems, and transit operations. Trip Generation Trip generation rates for the PM peak hour trip were developed in conjunction with the EMME2 model and are based on regional studies, local experience and calibration of } the EMME2 model. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates (Trip Generation, 71" Edition) were used to estimate trip generation for the AM and Saturday peak hour Federal Way City Center land use/development scenarios for 2009. The ITE trip generation rates used for the Federal Way City Center land use/development scenario analysis are compiled in Table 15. The ITE PM peak hour rates have been included for comparison only. Table 15: ITE ITE Category: ITE Code: independent variable: Weekday A.M. Peak average trip gen rate enter/exit Weekday P.M. Peak average trip gen rate enter/exit Saturday Peak average trip gen rate enter/exit Center SF Apartment Shopping General Industrial Hotel Detached Center Office Park 210 220 820 710 130 310 d.u. d.u. ksf Ksf ksf rooms 0.75 0.51 1.03 1.55 0.84 0.56 .25/.75 .20/.80 .6109 .88/.12 .82/.18 .61 /.39 1.01 0.62 3.75 1.49 0.86 0.59 .63/.37 .6505 .48/.52 .17/.83 .21 /.79 .53/.47 0.94 0.52 4.97 0.41 0.35 0.72 .54/.46 .54/.46 .52/.48 .54/.46 .32/.68 .56/.44 Source: ITE, Trip Generation, 7t' Edition 2004 • "SF" = single-family; "du" = dwelling units; `ksf" = thousands of gross square feet • PM Trip Rates used for comparison purposes only with EMME12 model output. 6/20/2006 35 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Table 16 summarizes the FWCC growth in trip generation (2004-2009). The PM peak hour volumes were based on the EMME/2 traffic model and the AM and Saturday use ITE rates. The estimates for the 2009 No Action (Alt 3) represents around a 10% growth in peak trips compared with 2004 conditions. Growth in the PM peak hour between 2004 and 2009 is approximately 40%, compared with 7% for the no action alternative. The AM peak hour trips for 2009 Alts 1 and 2 represents a 60% increase compared with 2004 conditions, while the Saturday trips are around 40-45% higher. Table 16: Summary of Peak Hour Trip Generation for Federal Way City Center AM peak hour 2,078 1,220 1,220 233 Saturday peak hour 6,713 2,816 2,816 613 PM peak hour 6,363 2,727 2,522 442 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 7th Edition (2004) for AM and Saturday Peak hour. The PM peak hour trips are based on the EMME/2 model origins and destinations from FWCC TAZs. Modal Split Assumption of modal splits are included in the transportation model for the future alternatives based upon the expected land use, jobs -to -housing balance and availability of transportation alternatives such as high capacity transit services. Application of these assumptions lowered the number of vehicle trips that would occur during the peak hour. No Action (Alternative 3) The No Action alternative represents the expected growth in the planning area without the planned FWCC. This alternative would follow existing development patterns. Roadway and transit improvements listed in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) are assumed to occur under this alternative. Traffic Growth Forecasts of the PM peak hour were completed using the EMME/2 transportation model. The model uses the 2009 land uses to estimate future traffic levels and to assign the volumes to the roadway network. Use of the model allows traffic to be redistributed, responding to new capacity from roadway improvements or drivers seeking new routes in order to avoid intersections with high delays. The EMME/2 forecasted volumes were post -processed using UFOSET software to distribute traffic volumes at intersections. The software uses existing traffic volumes to evaluate turning movements and then assigns forecasted trips to these movements and balances intersection volumes. For the No Action alternative (Alternative 3), the trip generation and distribution were based on the expected development in the planning area without the land use and zoning changes assumed in the development of the FWCC. Final PM Mirai Transportation 36 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis peak hour volumes included the addition of the Christian Faith Center trips. Appendix G includes tables that show the PM peak hour post -processed traffic volumes for 2009. The AM and Saturday peak hour forecasts use the traffic growth factors to estimate an expected 2009 background traffic. General background growth for the AM peak hours was assumed at 1.5% per year and for the Saturday peak hours was assumed at 1.1 % per year. The FWCC trip generation for each alternative was assigned and added to the background traffic, along with the Christian Faith Center volumes, to provide an estimate of 2009 volumes. Appendix G includes tables that detail the 2009 forecasts for the AM and Saturday peak hours. Traffic Volumes Figures 13-15 show the 2009 traffic volumes for the PM peak, AM peak and Saturday peak at each of the study intersections. The growth in traffic for the No Action alternative assumes the scheduled roadway improvements from the 2005-2010 TIP. 6/20/2006 37 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis s PM Peak Hour Study Intersections �1 S 288th St L �v�pZstQ9n` c -fj6 3161h 5i �►✓. I SVY'31 t� st r �. -u sw 320th st r 12 13 . 15 76 18 ' 3 S 320th S1 aiJ �`-¢ 1-S324th'St 20 335th 5t 21 �2 S - •� ''? SW 340th $t �, s r. a ass t- t 23 P4 d 7 S 3481h 5t 25 26 r' -F I 5w 35 th' 27 ", 02N.— Figure 13. 2009 No Action PM Peak Fbdeml Way Turning Volumes PI-nnlnp 6 Enan--rinp Mirai Transportation 38 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 'S. 272 St & Pacific Hwy S � :3. 272 S1 & 1-5 SB Ramp N oo S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp :S. 272 St & Military Rd S rn o co ;S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S m r OD N 41 16 tO a� 41 16 O O O d14 N� d!b a N m dib 80 ! 356 L 49 255 0 ! 691 2 t 0 603 270 ! 1373 -0-3 L f 620 1002 281 ! 810 �(�) L . 90 1428 29 ! 31 � L 5 o- 229 25 168 7 r 971 406 'a r 636 0 4 r 0 441 s r 221 26 s r 557 u�i m y o 0 o m N m rn rn � a m m $ 288 St&Military Rd Fwapbw S312 St&Pacific Hwy r 5312 St&28 AV - �' uoi m d 14 4634 ' m � nO1i 41416 cNn � o 4M44 124 ! L 137 16�.R 258 ! L 206 350 ! L 0 A L 359 O~ 493 '�'� } 410 O r 541 0 9 0 -0 Q 153 4 r 293 �� r 127 7 r 250 38 7 r 0 's titr 'i191 v S T20M&I AVEaq c'Hwy S a Av S 320 St & 23 AV b Olt. 4l16 d!b d14 4Mit4 J ; 120 ! L 167 396 ! L 270 ' ! L 88 ! L 189 �+ 683 1 2 1188 873 � 3 1088 +� '�4 1150 y $ 1543 7 r _ 148 'S s 351 112 s s 401 '� +' 45 7 r 289 �str titr 4t10 1rr atr m o O1 N m N m h o S 320 St & t- -320 Ramp rn - t & Mphlary Ra S 5 324 St & Pacific Hwy S SW 336 St & 21v N a 4M Fi .114 N N E 41116 r�2 N dlb tr0 N 4M94 0 ! L 0 .f i. 216 & L 183 77 ! L 77 276 ! L 275 1536 s «' 1355 O y j 7 1189 -S� 980 233 - g " 242 570 � 2U 969 763 i r 161 r 243 'a r 225 189 s r 391 125 S r 300 �tr �tr 41 atr 41111* 00 N N a m S O N S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S rn m m m SW 340 t Hoyt Rd SW o .SW Campus Dr & 1 AV 5 n rn S 348 St & Pacific Hwy S m rn m SW 356 St & 21 AV SW o �n �14 dlb 4M14 dlb .M14 302 ! L 237 35 ! L 81 171 ! L 179 116 ! L 120 424 ! L 264 354 21 399 365 � 22 689 726 23 1524 969 .0 24 0 1399 418 .4 25 . 787 257 'S r 132 99 7 r 279 128 % r 257 147 'S r 400 2 '1 r 136 tr 41 16 411r atr atr S 356 St & Pao5c Hwy S m S 356 St & Enchanted P%wy 5 J 14 41 14 160 ! L 34 332 ! L 15 374 �'► 26 604 16 27 t 25 319 4 r 185 277 4 r 18 41 t r 41 t r (r0 O O N W C" of Federal Way Figure 13. 2009 No Action PM Peak Turning Volumes Pimnnine 6 Enpnee�tno 6/20/2006 39 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis AM Peak Hour Study Intersections a QTr aF o& Federal Way S 2�2nd St {r",— Figure 14. 2009 No Action AM Peak Turning Volumes T�n.Po.,on Plannlnp 6 ! Enpineeno Mirai Transportation 40 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis !S. 272 St & Paci is Hwy S S. 272 St & 1-5 St3 Ramp S. IT2 St & 1- amp t Minlary Rd S ac 41 1 4 41 1 4 41 1 16 41 1 4 41 1 4 284 J 284 O L 227 227 0 1 1183 L 2 0 414 641 1 L 406 681 3 406 424 -1 630 H i 119 H 734 � L • +j 28 7 r 208 252 7 r 246 0 4 r 0 117 "4 r 118 4 r tr o � a tr a tr 41 tr 41 tr 5 288 St & Military Rd S 5Dash PonlRd&PaciicHwy m m 12St&Pacific Hwy S•. S312 1628AVS 316St&PacthcHwy S .114 N N .114 4114 41l4 41 i4 L 876 1 L 0 L 1 L ! L o �0_ o •� �►� ,q s r 157s r o s r 4 r s r a1 atr titr o atM 41tr atr t v m 5W 320 Si& 1 Av [ Pacific t v v co m r N m .111. .114 4114 41l4 41Ml4 361 1 IL26 260 1 L 72 A L L & L 771 Z qi �- 253 1102 12 273 1 �3 f4 • 45 123 s r 99 231 4 r 135 4 r 4 r 4 r �tr m o ON N m atr m rn m N V N atr atr air 5 320 St & 1-5 SB -320 Ramp PS-320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp K. St & Military Rd S S 324 St & Pacific Hwy 5 SW 336 51 & 21 AV 5W a 41 1 4 .1 1 4 .1 916 .1 94 *1 a s L o � L : L : a-L -1Z� 1535 $ 1038 e• y 1g 4. ~ i� a. ~480 sr197 sr s r 4 r s s *1tr o a a atr 4jt16 41tr 41t10 5336 St & Pacific Hwy S :SW 340 81&Hoyt d SW SW Campus Or AvS 5348 Sto Pacific Hwy SW 356 St&21 AV SW .114 .+14 .114 .114 4Ml4 114 1 L 81 .? L 55 j L 1 L ! L 457 21 375 621 22 155 '�� �4 • r xS « 183 '3 r 59 187 4 r 81 4 s 4 s s s atr � N Q c0 titr atr atr atr 5 356 St & Pacific Hwy S 3 356 St & Enchanted PKwy S 41.14 4114 L L • s z • r 4 zr 4. s 41tr 42tr --k CITY Or Federal Way 6/20/2006 Figure 14. 2009 No Action AM Peak Turning Volumes 41 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Saturdayo hi p� r ■ l s: I'th St jw 75 : r fil = a Figure 15. 2009 No Action Saturday Peak F@dwill Way Turning Volumes Trenaconucion P��nnlnp 6 Enpineerinp Mirai Transportation 42 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 272 St & Pacific Hwy S v r O O N •+ 1 4 113 j t 116 384 ^ 335 113 7 J r 390 a is 268 St & Mititary Rd d!4 j � � L y � s s Its 272 S1 & 1-5 SB Ramp m 4A 14 0 1 i 0 857 426 285 ': r 156 ale 0 0 0 S. 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp .1 1 4 477 1 16 416 634 O r• 378 o s r o tits j L 238 1 t 150 r 387 - $ « 502 i r 124 s r 230 Its tits 272 St & Military Rd S 0 87 j ti 77 O 21 z13 s r r 94 9a ate 6 Av6 d!4 j L g « s s 1te N � � V N 320 St & 21 Av S SW 320 St & 1 Av S S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 13 320 St & 20 Av S 41 1 4 a J 1 4 a 41 1 4 4A 1 4 116 1 L 132 661 1 i 299 553 1 ti 382 1163 1042 1197 -03 4- 10.17 O 1311 -0 4 4-1377 4 t 114 7 r 384 57 4 r 490 199 7 r 413 I t s a t e oa a t e a t e Na 20 St & 1-5 SIB -320 Ramp S 320 St & 320 - I-514B Ramp ryRd S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S r St & Pacific H d 116 j L � 5 • s s 1 tP rn m 1"1 i it55 152 126 245 -a r 255 ate 320 St&23 AvS v m o v v, a 4 190 .t fr 376 1624 � 1� 4-2031 72 'Sr 495 ats d11. 14 4194 d14 41111194 0 1 ti 0 0 .t ti 119 j L 130 l t 79 j L 1996 '� s r" 1628 1156 - '} 7 t' 1139 0 '� $ « 172 -09 4- 242 -0 2d « 664 s r 157 978 s r 0 7 r 132 s r 282 'a r a to ate 1tM a is Its O m O V N &Ractrlc Svwv 3 b$t&-Hoyt Rd SW SW Campus Dr&1Av SW 356 St&21 Av SW d l b N m 41 1 4 d l b all 916 41 916 r ZI • 76 1 O i 74 572 367 j L 10 i3 41+ j L j L s s 132 s r 199 s 7kL { s 7 r 1t1' ats 1tr 1tr 1t1� d!b dl1. j L j L 1 tM 1 tM Cl1YOF ` Figure 15. 2009 No Action Saturday Peak Federal Way Turning Volumes E Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 6/20/2006 Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 2009 No Action Traffic Operations The AM, PM and Saturday study intersections were analyzed using the Synchro 6.0 (Build 6.12) analysis software. Table 17 lists the LOS operation for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hour for each of the study intersections analyzed for that period. These intersection operation results assume the completion of the 2005-2010 Transportation Improvement Program, and existing signal timing and phasing as provided by the City of Federal Way. Appendix H contains the No Action (Alternative 3) 2009 HCM intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Table 17. 2009 Traffic Operations No Action Alternative 3 Intersection 1. S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S F 1.10* C 0.71 D 0.77 2. S 272 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp F 1.02* C 0.73 C 0.62 3. S 272 St & 1-5 northbound Ramp C 0.92 E 1.08* B 0.67 4. S 272 St & Military Rd S F 1.24* F 1.09* D 0.63 5. S 288th St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.82 M 6. S 288th St & Military Rd S C 0.78 7. S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S C 0.50 8. S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S E 1.05* D 0.86 9. S 312 St & 28 Av S - B 0.643 unsignalized 10. S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.89 11. SW 320 St & 21 Av SW D 0.76 �. 12. S 320 St & 1 Av S D 0.81 C 0.77 D 0.85 13. S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.92 D 0.92 14. S 320 St & 20 Av S - - E 1.14* 15. S 320 St & 23 Av S D 0.77 F 0.95* 16. S 320 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp C 0.78 C 0.68 CAW[ 0.84 17. S 320 St & 1-5 northbound Ramp BM[ 0.68 18. S 320 St & Military Rd S D 0.96 MaL 19. S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.86 D MF- 0.77 _ 20. SW 336 St & 21 Av SW E 0.99 21. S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S D 1.03* C 0.68 �- 22. SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW C 0.63 B 0.52 B_=� 23. SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S E 0.96 ��- 24. S 348 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.87-- 25. SW 356 St & 21 Av SW C 0.85�-- 26. S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S C 0.87�- 27. S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S D 0.82 - - - 'LOS reflects the overall operation of the intersection based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 methodology 2VIC is the combined volume%apacity of the critical movements of the intersection as identified as the X, in the HCM 2000 methodology. 3Maximum v/c ratio at all -way stop -controlled unsignalized intersection. *Results from HCM2000 Signals (version 4.10 Mirai Transportation 44 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 2009 No Action Deficiencies This section describes the 2009 No action alternative deficiencies. The City of Federal Way defines the minimum acceptable level of service as LOS E or better with a volume/capacity ratio of less than 1.00 for signalized intersections. Intersections operating below this threshold are deficient. PM peak hour Deficiencies — Five intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2009. Deficient intersections are focused along Pacific Highway S and along S 272 Street, where growth in regional traffic is expected to affect intersection operations during the PM peak hour. AM peak hour Deficiencies — Two of the study intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2009. The areas with the deficient locations are along S 272 Street at the 1-5 northbound ramp and Military Road S intersections. Saturday peak hour Deficiencies — Two of the Saturday study intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2009 under the No Action Alternative. These intersections are located in the heart of the FWCC at the intersections of S 320 Street & 20 Avenue S and S 320 Street & 23 Avenue S. Weekend retail activity at these locations is likely to contribute to the high traffic levels observed at these intersections. Parking Requirement Table 18 describes the increase in parking requirements for the No Action alternative above the existing parking requirements shown in Table 10. These increases assume full development by the year 2014. A total of 7,485 spaces would be required to meet the proposed Alternative 3 land uses. The number of spaces represents the City's Parking Code requirement and may be reduced through shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management programs. This reduction could vary from 10% to 20%. Table 18. Additional Parking Required for - ..- Requirement Civic Uses Case by case Hotel 1 per room Office 1 per 300 sf Other 1 per 1000 sf Residential 1.7 per unit Retail 1 per 300 sf Alternative 3 at Buildout 0 sf 0 rooms 104,440 sf 0 sf 270 units 220,270 sf Total Additional Total Parking Source: Jones and Stokes Associates 2005. (1) These parking demands may be 10% to 20% less based on shared parking. 0 stalls 0 stalls 348 stalls 0 459 stalls 734 stalls 1,541 stalls 7,485 stalls 6/20/2006 45 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Traffic Safety Impact As the amount of traffic increases within the area, the probability of traffic collisions would be expected to increase. The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision, Chapter 3, page III-7) identifies that congestion is a primary factor in collision rates. While the No Action alternative would increase the number of trips at high collision locations, the number of trips associated with this alternative make up only a small proportion of the entering trips. Transit Service Impact The No Action alternative would support increased transit services and accessibility described in the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2002 revision, Chapter 7). These actions would increase transit service levels and envisions increasing jobs and housing opportunities within the FWCC to create a transit -oriented community. Pedestrian Accessibility The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2002 revision, Chapter 7) identifies a number of roadway and pedestrian improvements to occur as part of the development in the project area (see Figure 12). Improvements include sidewalks and pedestrian corridors, addition of the grid street system, pedestrian crossings (potentially elevated) of major roadways and inclusion of pedestrian elements such as street furniture, covered transit stops, and pedestrian -scale lighting. Bicycle Mobility Impact Chapter 7 of the 2002 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (see Figure 12) identifies bicycle facilities planned for the City Center area. These bicycle facilities would connect major destinations and would increase the mobility of bicyclists within the project area. New development under the No Action Alternative would increase demand for bicycle facilities in the project area. Because development levels are expected to be less compared to Alternatives 1 or 2, impacts on bicycle facilities demand would be correspondingly less. Under the No Action Alternative, impacts associated with individual development proposals in this area would continue to be individually reviewed through the SEPA review process and decisions about the need for bicycle facilities would be made on a case -by -case basis. Proposed Mitigation Table 19 identifies proposed mitigation for the No Action alternative to meet the City's or responsible jurisdiction's LOS threshold. Intersections along S 272 Street are controlled by the City of Kent or King County and are mitigated based on the jurisdictions LOS threshold requirements. Appendix I contains the intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for intersections mitigated under the No Action alternative. Mirai Transportation 46 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis A Projects identified as CIP are those projects currently identified in the City's 2009-2020 Capital Improvement Program. Projects identified as TSM are Traffic System Management improvements identified by the City as part of their City Center Access Study for 2030 improvements. Table 19. No Action Proposed Mitigation PM Peak Hour 1 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S F 1.10* No mitigation proposed (1) 2 S 272 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp F 1.02* No mitigation proposed (1) 4 S 272 St & Military Rd S F 1.24* No mitigation proposed (2) 8 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.95 Add 2nd northbound left turn lane (CIP 01-05) 21 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.92 Optimized signal timing AM Peak Hour 3 S 272 St & 1-5 northbound Ramp E 1.08* No mitigation proposed (1) 4 S 272 St & Military Rd S F 1.09* No mitigation proposed (2) SATURDAY Peak Hour 14 S 320 St & 20 Av S D 0.95 Southbound and northbound right turn lanes (TSM 2) 15 S 320 St & 23 Av S E 0.92* Add second northbound right turn lane. (TSM 3) *Results from HCM2000 Signals (version 4.10 (1) The City of Kent exempts intersections along Highways of Statewide Significance from their LOS threshold (2) King County requires mitigation of intersections that receive 30 trips in an hour and 20% of the proposed new trips and exceeds LOS F. Less than 2% of project trips access the King County intersection of Military Road/272nd Street. 6/20/2006 47 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Alternative 1 This section describes the traffic impacts associated with Alternative 1. The section describes the trip generation, distribution and assignment, the 2009 turning volumes, transportation impacts and recommended mitigation. Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Alternative 1 focuses development in Blocks 2 and 3 within the Federal Way City Center. Under this alternative, development would be concentrated along S 320 Street. PM peak hour trip distribution and assignment were completed using the Federal Way EMME/2 model. AM and Saturday distribution and assignment follow existing area traffic patterns. Figures 16 to 18 show the trip distribution for the 2009 under Alternative 1 for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Traffic Volumes Figures 19 to 21 show the 2009 turning movement volumes for each study intersection for Alternative 1 for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. 2009 Alternative 1 Traffic Operations The AM, PM and Saturday study intersections were analyzed using the Synchro 6.0 analysis software. The City considers intersections to be operating at an acceptable LOS if operations are LOS E or better and its v/c ratios are less than 1.0 for the critical movements of the intersection. Table 20 lists the LOS operation for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hour for Alternative 1. These intersection operations are based on existing signal timing and phasing as provided by the City of Federal Way. Appendix J contains the Alternative 1 intersection analysis sheets for the 2009 PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Mirai Transportation 48 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis N C j2J 5 tdHB 5' 4MS.ap 21. A t 75 Y fi .Atplh 276 32 r 53' 182 ` Lis wT 2 ail326 1153. 196 s � j$1 s s2+n 9t. N��' 2Qi 226 ��1fi01 Al�L1.1 L` J v ;[V, Sr7JG; t n.V S3 a716L r3 yaT�h 5 :1r*lh 31 S < S 3SLI4 5• - N 4 City Center Volume b Combined _ Directions - b 500 + 250 - 499 r 100 - 249 -- ij m < 100 Figure 16. 2009 Alternative 1 PM Peak Trip CIY. OF Federal Way Distribution I Enrai.,ee r,r, 6/20/2006 49 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Saoftsl D15 E0 11777 'j L5_ 162 114i S lit F! 137 [F2 7N�X 82 o:4 1 5 A"O Sw kn ko SaXll 534qnsi. rt City Center 1-141 volume Combined Directions 500+ 250-499 100-249 < 100 4% CITVOP Federal Way Figure 17. 2009 Alternative 1 AM Peak Trip Distribution T P, Enpinnnrinp Mirai Transportation 50 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis A CITY or Federal Way Figure 18. 2009 Alternative 1 Saturday Peak Trip Distribution Tronoporcwa�on P��nnina 6 Enpinmer�no 6/20/2006 51 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis PM Peak Hour Study Intersections -k Federal Way S 2�2nd Figure 19. 2009 Alternative 1 PM Peak Turning Volumes Trwnrpprm eon Prann�np 6 Enpinwmvns Mirai Transportation 52 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis z72 St & Padfic Hwy S � N m m !� N 41 1 16 60 J 48 353 -1,252 170 SOt r 973 41 it r m . m v N m rn o r� N n 41 1 1. 355 J 16 139 497 355 � $ � 497 152 S r 294 �tr � V m m h � N N m o e m � N V d 1 4 0 J L 0 1556 1 6 1363 742 S r 154 O O O 36 St & Pacific Hwy S m � o m 4A ib 305 J L 237 357 21 400 260 S r 133 �m m m o 56 St & Pacific Hwy S n o N O O N d 1 4 173 J L 33 381 `js 607 330 'a r 170 �tr m a m r o r N V 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramp a m N m m v m .1 1 1► 0 J (2D 0 692 1t 601 401 S r 613 41 t r 7aOP"MRd&P-7aicH" A 916 J � i WOO r t !" OTT of IA Federal Way 41 a 1. 123 J L 170 682 12 t 1179 147 S r 344 N � m 4 L 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW m v � n r � 1 4 35 J BO 364 22 t 691 99 S r 282 41 t r a �n m m m N a m O d 1 1► 15 J O L 15 15 " 2] � 26 258 S Jr 16 41tr o m m a � 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp O O O d l l► 273 J L 619 1364 $ 4- 978 0 S r 0 41 t r N 312 St & Pacific Hwy S r n rn a O m m � N 260 J IL 205 408 $ 4- 539 127 S r 247 41 t r O N W N O� 320 St & Pacific Hwy rn m m a m N � a d 1 b 396 J ^ L 268 B71 -+ 871 13 4-1083 111 S Jl r 397 m v n N N d 1 4 217 J L 183 1186 1$ 4- 967 238 S s 219 m m rn Campus Dr & 1 Av S a m a a m m in d 1 1. 169 J L 180 728 72B 1528 126 S r 256 272 St & Military Rd S I m v m V O 41 i 4 279 J L 99 8 O 1432 43 438 S r 241 41 t 10 o m m N r m r 351 J L 0 0 '* g *- 0 41 S r 0 titr O N O O N m m u� o � o I� N 41 1 1► 76 J IL80 234 y 19 4- 249 189 S r 403 �tr N � � N � N N m m Q �2 N m d i 4 122 J 16105 975 24 4-- 1383 153 S r 344 atr m m o o a m N Figure 19. 2009 Alternative 1 PM Peak Turning Volumes S 288 St & Padfic Hwy S m m N m 49 1 1► 29 J IL226 30 .6 4- 24 26 S r 546 41 it r _ r o a N W t�J r � v d 1 1► 85 J L 183 1153 1 § � 1518 47 S r 299 N t 10 m� m � v O O O m N d i 1► 275 J L 274 571 .r 20 4- 974 125 'S r 302 41 t r � O N m N � m m � 1 1► JD251 1, 23 429 -0 794 2 S 136 atr � m m Tran000rcacion Plmnnlnp 6 Enpinnnrinp 6/20/2006 53 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis emw 'A Federal Way Figure 20. 2009 Alternative 1 AM Peak Turning Volumes j Tro oq��on Pia ru.irG 6 Enun...,r.no Mirai Transportation 54 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 1S. 272 St & Pacific Hwy S S. 272 St & 1-5 SIB Ramp S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp S. 272 St & Military Rd S Pacific 4214 J14 dit4 J11► 71-t- �1165 1 285 L 158 227 0-S 1186 - '� 0641 414 ,t L 851 684 �7 F 4116 428 & IL119 -14 734 O .* y 28 7 r 220 252 '4 ! 246 0 '!< r 0 117 r 121 4 ! ti tr m tO rn 1 tr o 0 0 1 tr ti tr tr Dash Poinl Rd & Pac7c?9wy S S 312 St & Pacific Hwy 5 SIM St & 28 Av S -S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 414 N O� N V O .114 .114 41a16 al14 � 876 1 L 0 1/^` L � L j i - w • O r 0 Is y(::�) • • iQ F s 163 s r 0 Is Is ! Is! 1tr 411itr m 1tr 1t50 1tr S W 320 St & 21 Av S Lo ;SW 320 St & 1 Av S S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S S 320 St & 20 Av S S 320 St & 23 Av S h m 4A 1 4 4A l b d 916 41 116 d l 16 366 lS 36 t L 26 262 261 1 11 1 � L 12 72 267 .t i � 3 • -0L '� � L 15 123 3! . 111 220 S r 133 4 ! ! 411 t r Lo h t r 1 t r 1 t r 42 1 r S 320 Sl & 1-5 SB -320 Ramp m o SMOM320 - 1-5 NB Ramp S 320 St & Mtiaary Ra 8 5 324 St & Pacific Hwy S SW 336 St & 21 Av SW m N 4A14 dl4 dlb 4114 4114 0 1 L 0 L .2 ti L S L 1587 1138 y 17 a' • �$ ~ ~ �S �" • (20)- 490 S r 197 �tr O o 0 1tr 1tr 11r 1tr S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S o m SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 'Sw Campus Dr& I Av S S 345 St & Pacific Hwy S SV.356 516 24 Av SW o 4A 1 4 4A 1 4 d l 4 41111 1 4 d l 4 136 1 136 t �� L 93 �'j 16 37 81 1 1643 4 �t159 55 A L w �3 16 1 L AZ� &190 1 L S r 62 187 r 81 7 ! 7 o. Z ! ti it oo� v r ti it 1 tr 1 tr 1 tr S 356 St & Pactfic Hwy S S 356 St & Enc ante 41 916 d it 1tr 1tr -4k CITY OF Federal Way 6/20/2006 Figure 20. 2009 Alternative 1 AM Peak Turning Volumes P�.,....,..� r: • �••� 55 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis S #20 St Saturday Peak Hour Study Intersections 2.- 4 3 jJl ! 2 Qut S 3081h St.q oaShQon e 7i S 310th St co a' s�^. St 810 �p L s 2 I, , r.. =. 72 13' 14 S32M5t _ 15 16 17:S 324th St - r A' S 3 th St 22 SW 340th 6-1 S,� �CIO h S 148th 5t — C1Af Ornih C .a , Figure 21. 2009 Alternative 1 Saturday Federal Way Peak Turning Volumes i T��noa�x.=.fo. P�o.,.r.w B. E.,p�.,���., Mirai Transportation 56 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis A 11272 St & Pacific Hwy S N 13. 272 St & 1-5 SIB Ramp ;S. 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp S. 272 St & Military Rd S It & Pacific H O .A14 4114 494 4.11114 4194 113 j L 116 384 + 335 0 -&L 857 � t • 0 426 477 j 634 —1 y f+ 417 378 87 j 526 -1 L 4 77 539 j + *. 113 S r 417 286 7 r 156 0 '1 r 0 215 3 r 98 7 r 41tr 421r 41tr titr atr o m� N r v r N m W Dash Point Rd &-Paciffb 9.312 St & Pacific Hwy S $ 312 St & 26 Av S _ S 316 St & Paci is 14wy S dl4 41 .A14 4114 N .+14 L 238 j L 183 j L 117 1 IL189 + { g ] + 10 7 j f 432 -1O$ + 517 -1. 152 + '� Q 4-126 7 �� ! 159 7 r 288 Is �D r 245 s ! 274 All tr 41111", titr atr �tr N � m ;SW 320 St & 21 Av S ;S W 320 St & 1 Av S S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S S 320 St & 20 Av 5 IS 320 St & 23 Av S 4194 co tO .114 v v 4414 .11114 :2 ; m � � v 4.11114 j + 116 j 1383 L � 2 t O 137 1103 789 j 1403 + L '� 3 O 367 1078 642 jSL 1368 �4- 384 1423 198 .t 1799 + L 5 � 405 2355 114 'S r 400 57 s r 509 403 sr 547 74 7 r 495 42 �ftrr titr titr 41t1* S 320 St & 1-5 SB -320 Ramp rn S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB tRamp 6 324 St & Pacdlc Hwy 5 r r rn 4114 m .A14 b 4114 dl4 4114 0 .t L 0 0 j L 119 j L 132 j L j L 2144 + '� 6 1890 1249 + j 7 1402 + '� $ 4. 176 + 19 246 +7 20 693 7 r 157 1034 'S ! 0 s r 132 s r 2 323 -1 s titr titr 41tr atr m � 41tr S 336 c Hwy SW SW 340 St&Hoyt Rd SVV :3W Campus Dr&1 Av5 `-356 S16 21Av SW 41l4 4194 4194 dl4 j 1 7s j L 74 j ti jSs j t + �t szz + 22 3n .8 �3 16 +� Z5 132 'SO r 199 : r: 7 r Nir 'fir atr �tr �tr a m m 356 St & Pacific 5 356 St & En a d 14 d.14 j s s r j s s s atr atr Cil Y of Federal Way 6/20/2006 Figure 21. 2009 Alternative 1 Saturday Peak Turning Volumes 57 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Table 20. 2009 Alternative 1 Intersection Operations 1. S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S F 1.09* D 0.71 i ❑ 0.79 2. S 272 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp F 1.00* C 0.73 �.. C 0.62 3. S 272 St & 1-5 northbound Ramp C 0.92 E 1.09* B.. B 0.67 4. S 272 St & Military Rd S F 1.22* F 1.10*.11 D 0.63 5. S 288th St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.81 L A L__� IL 6. S 288th St & Military Rd S C 0.78 � f A-K 7. S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S _ C 0.52-� 8. S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S E 1.05* 9. S312St&28AvS B 0.653 10. S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S �� r E M V.05* 11. SW 320 St & 21 Av SW j D 0.78 12. S 320 St & 1 Av S D 0.82 D 0.81 ] D 0.98 13. S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.91 F 1.00* 14. S 320 St & 20 Av S F 1.35* 15. S 320 St & 23 Av S D 0.76 F 1.04* 16. S 320 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp C 0.78 C 0.72 C 0.92 17. S 320 St & I-5 northbound Ramp B 0.72 18. S 320 St & Military Rd S D 0.96 19. S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.87 D 0.87 20. SW 336 St & 21 Av SW E 0.99 ;_ 21. S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S D 1.04* C 0.69 22. SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW C 0.63 B 0.53 C 0.57 23. SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S E 0.97 j ANN 24. S 348 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.80-- 25. SW 356 St & 21 Av SW C 0.84 3�-- 26. S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S C 0.84--- 27. S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S D 0.83 ---- 'LOS reflects the overall operation of the intersection based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 methodology 2VIC is the combined volume%apacity of the critical movements of the intersection as identified as the X, in the HCM 2000 methodology. 3Maximum v/c ratio at all -way stop -controlled unsignalized intersection. *Results from HCM2000 Signals (version 4.10 2009 Alternative 1 Deficiencies This section describes the 2009 Alternative 1 deficiencies. The City of Federal Way defines the minimum acceptable level of service as LOS E or better with a volume/capacity ratio of less than 1.00 for signalized intersections. Intersections operating below this threshold are deficient Mirai Transportation 58 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis PM Peak Hour Deficiencies — Five intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2009 for Alternative 1. Deficient intersections are focused along S 272 Street and Pacific Highway S, where growth in regional traffic is expected to affect intersection operations during the PM peak hour. AM Peak Hour Deficiencies — Two of the study intersections exceed the City's } deficiency threshold in 2009 for Alternative 1. The deficient intersections are located at ! 1-5 northbound Ramp and Military Road S along S 272 Street. Saturday Peak Hour Deficiencies — Four of the Saturday study intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2009 for Alternative 1. These intersections are focused around the FWCC area, at S 316 Street and S 320 Street on Pacific Highway S, and at the intersections at 20 Avenue S and 23rd Avenue S on S 320 Street. Weekend retail activity at these locations is likely to contribute to the high traffic at these intersections. Parking Requirements Table 21 describes the increase in parking requirement for the Alternative 1 above the existing code requirements shown in Figure 10. These increases assume full development by the year 2014. A total of 11,486 spaces would be required to meet existing and future lane uses. The parking requirements estimate the number of spaces ' required for the proposed mix of uses assumed for Alternative 1. Compared with : Alternative 3, the City's parking code would require approximately 4,000 additional spaces for Alternative 1. These spaces may be provided on the site or as part of parking garages assumed as part of the FWCC development. The actual parking requirement for an individual development may be reduced through shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management programs. This reduction could vary from 10% to 20%. Table 21. Additional Parking Required for Alternative 1 at Buildout Civic Uses Case by case 100,000 sf Unknown UnknownW Hotel 1 per room 600 rooms 600 stalls 600 stalls Office 1 per 300 sf 350,000 sf 1,167 stalls 819 stalls Other 1 per 1000 sf 0 sf 0 stalls 0 stalls i Residential 1.7 per unit 750 units 1,275 stalls 816 stalls Retail 1 per 300 sf 750,000 sf 2,500 stalls 1,766 stalls Total Additional 5,542 stalls 4,001 stalls Total Parkino 11.486 stalls Source: Jones and Stokes Associates, 2005. These parking demands may be 10% to 20% less based on shared parking 6/20/2006 59 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Traffic Safety Impact As the amount of traffic increases within the area, the probability of traffic collisions would be expected to increase. The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision, Chapter 3, page III-7) identifies that congestion is a primary factor in collision rates. Alternative 1 would increase the number of trips at high collision locations, the number of trips associated with this alternative make up only a small proportion of the entering trips. In addition, roadway improvements designed to reduce congestion may lower congestion -associated collisions. Transit Service Impact Alternative 1 would provide a high level of urban development and amenities in immediate proximity to the new 312th Street Transit Center. Under the alternative, a large proportion of development would be concentrated along S 320 Street, near the transit center, providing a high number of potential transit users who may be able to walk to the Transit Center. Expected residents of the FWCC would likely include transit users and may result in increased ridership demand at the transit center. Pedestrian Accessibility The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2002 revision, Chapter 7) identifies a number of roadway and pedestrian improvements to occur as part of development of the project area (see Figure 12). Alternative 1 concept of a pedestrian -oriented, mixed - use center would encourage use of these facilities, as residents would be able to easily access retail and service locations within a short walking distance. Bicycle Mobility Impact Chapter 7 of the 2002 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (see Figure 12) identifies bicycle facilities planned for the City Center area. These bicycle facilities would connect major destinations and would increase the mobility of bicyclists within the project area. New development under Alternative 1 would increase the demand for bicycle facilities in the project area. Impacts associated with development permitted through the Planned Action Ordinance would be addressed as described in the Additional Mitigation described on page 94. Proposed Mitigation Alternative 1 would increase the density and activity within the FWCC core. The increased density could increase traffic congestion; however, these increases may be offset by reduced vehicle travel demand resulting from mixed -use development, improvements to pedestrian facilities, and improved transit services. Based on the LOS analysis, the following additional improvements (those beyond improvements identified for Alternative 3) would be required under Alternative 1 to meet the City's LOS threshold. Table 22 identifies the intersection location, the LOS and v/c ratio, and Mirai Transportation 60 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering a Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis suggested mitigation for each intersection. Appendix K contains the intersection analysis sheets for the 2009 PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for intersections mitigated in Alternative 1. 7 Table 22. Alternative 1 Mitigation PM PEAK 2009 - Alternative 1 Mitigated intersection mrem® Improvements over Alt 3 l 1 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S F 1.09* No mitigation proposed (1) 2 S 272 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp _ E 1.00* No mitigation proposed (1) 4 S 272 St & Military Rd S F 1.22* No mitigation proposed (2) 8 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.95 Alternative 3 mitigation (CIP 01-05) 21 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.93 Optimize signal timing AM Peak Hour 2009 - Alternative 1 . - • Intersection Co—s �' improvements 3 S 272 St & 1-5 northbound Ramp ` E 1.09* No mitigation proposed (1) 4 S 272 St & Military Rd S F 1.10* No mitigation proposed (2) SATURDAY 2009 - Alternative 1 mintersection�® .. 10 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.92 Eastbound right turn lane (TSM 12) 13 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S E 0.96 Northbound right turn lane 14 S 320 St & 20 Av S D 0.99 Alternative 3 mitigation (TSM 2) 15 S 320 St & 23 Av S E 0.92 Alternative 3 mitigation (TSM 3) plus westbound right turn lane *Results from HCM2000 Signals (version 4.1 t) (1) The City of Kent exempts intersections along Highways of Statewide Significance from their LOS threshold (2) King County requires mitigation of intersections that receive 30 trips in an hour and 20% of the proposed new trips and exceeds LOS F. Less than 2% of project trips access the King County intersection of Military Road/272nd Street. 6/20/2006 61 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Alternative 2 This section describes the traffic impacts associated with Alternative 2. The section describes the trip generation, distribution and assignment, the 2009 turning volumes, transportation impacts and recommended mitigation. Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Alternative 2 accounts for the same level of development within the Federal Way City Center as Alternative 1, but spreads this development throughout the FWCC area. The trip distribution and assignment were completed using the City's EMME/2 model. AM and Saturday distribution and assignment follow existing area traffic patterns. Figures 22 to 24 show the trip distribution for the 2009 under Alternative 2 for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Traffic Volumes Figures 25 to 27 show the 2009 turning movement volumes for each study intersection for Alternative 2 for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Traffic volumes for the PM peak hour are based on the model results. AM and Saturday volumes were estimated based upon an annual growth rate. 2009 Alternative 2 Traffic Operations The AM, PM and Saturday study intersections were analyzed using the Synchro 6.0 (Build 6.12) analysis software. The City considers intersections to be operating at an acceptable LOS if operations are LOS E or better and its v/c ratios are less than 1.0 for the critical movements of the intersection. Table 23 lists the LOS operation for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hour for Alternative 2. These intersection operations are based on existing signal timing and phasing as provided by the City of Federal Way. Appendix L contains the Alternative 2 intersection analysis sheets for the 2009 PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Mirai Transportation 62 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 5 272,J K- H Y L i {� 9lnrl.�ln Al r. p 5'lBAR &. 39 n 45 149 nse ' iG5 � a i56 292 e 174 - IDS � i87 l82 � ., 216 ;,, a 1154. •MiAWSW L• saw: s m a Rn SL k C S 36u1, N City Center F1141 Volume - Combined -' Directions � a 500 + - 250 - 499 1 - 100 - 24s < 100 A «ri Federal Way Figure 22. 2009 Alternative 2 PM Peak Trip Distribution Volumes Tr.noPo��on Pl�nnlnp 6 Enp,neer,no 6/20/2006 63 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis N $ t1 C !! � & S Ster3,sLw aA a pP 8 C f :C t� ` s iiei a} S ::6HF 91. y +I zw- F 1�� S77 s17- c• Div +A �, „ 54 �158t ° SWa Cw '. 42 143 102 i' s=x ax I:i32 �53 i09 4 S r11 �+ •LL � Ayp SN1 _ � s ix+t� n S 3a9;, $L S J!kL4 Se C' a S79.eii h i City Center 114 Volume Combined ❑erections' 500 + 250 - 499 I 100 - 249 c 100 Figure 23. 2009 Alternative 2 AM Peak a"c Federal Way Trip Distribution ' T�.noPo�-won S Enplrinp —glne. Mirai Transportation 64 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis J City Ce 5-141 Volume Combined Directions 500 + 1 250 - 4E 100 - 2� < 100 am or Federal Way 6/20/2006 -24 F 128 T8 326 104 200 s Figure 24. 2009 Alternative 2 Saturday Peak Trip Distribution T�noPo Pi�nnine S Enpineerinp 65 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis PM Peak Hour Study Intersections 0"w I - -4*1. Federal Way Figure 25. 2009 Alternative 2 PM Peak IN Turning Volumes Enand..rina Mirai Transportation 66 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S IS- 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramp :3. 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp ;S. 272 St & Mi itary Rd S :S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S cO N 41 1 4 f0 a r .1 14 0 0 0 .1 1 4 N N .1 1 4 V N m .1 916 81 1 L 49 0 1 L 0 264 1 t.628 311 1 t.102 30 1 L 228 354 � O ! 257 685 (2D t 610 1375 - 3 4- 1022 799 - 4 4- 1457 31 .r g 4- 24 170 7 r 960 406 'a r 656 0 Is 0 438 'S r 223 26 s r 546 41 tr 41 tr 41 tr 41 tr tr S288St&M101aryRd5 r-01nl Hwy. S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S m S312St&28AvS 316StSPac-fcH"S m rn m 41 1 4 41 1 4 a o rn d 1 4 � r d 1 4 49 1 4 123 1 351�6) L 140 ~ 493 '� L ~ 259 1 411 L 206 545 352 1 0 Dik-4. 0 0150 1 L % r 298 r 126 7 r 247 41 7r 0 7 r 41 41Tr 41tr 7t� �m� os� Sao v S S 320 St & Pacfic Hwy S v 20 St & 23 Av 41 1 4 4 1 4 4A 1 4 l +1 916 d 916 � -W L 123 1 L 169 397 1 t.268 � L 84 1 tr.181 { 683 t 12 1183 869 � 3 4- 1086 r 4 r 1142 -0 5 4. 1526 146 'a r 341 111 '4 r 394 `* r 45 s r 286 '� Tr 41 t r 01 t r Ost r 41 t r m N N M N OJ N O n t & MMilary Rd S S324 S1 & Pacibc Hwy S 6 1 Av SW d14 J14 .1116 4144 d11. 0 1 L 0 & L 218 1 L 182 76 1 L 79 276 1 f. 274 1547 6 O 1359 "+ 17 1193 -0 �$ 973 235 � 19 O 243 571 20 972 738 4 r 155 r 241 7 r 220 188 'a r 398 124 % r 298 41 tr 41 t r '1 tr 41 t r 41 tr 336 St & Pacific Hwy S :SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S S 348 St & Pacific Hwy S SW 356 St & 21 Av SW .114 .1116 4A14 d a 4114 308 1 313 21 L 236 401 35 1 365 L 22 81 690 172 1 729 * L 23 0" 180 1519 118 1 984 �► L 24 f 112 1380 399 1 423 .0 L 25 0. 265 797 260 s r 131 99 7 r 281 128 4 r 255 141 7 r 354 2 7 r 136 41 tr 41 tr *1 tr 41 tr 41 It 0 c0 ry m m m m N n N N f7 N N in o' m m N N W t0 O S 356 St Pact c Hwy S S 356 St &Enchanted Pkwy 0 cn rn v J 14 o d 14 176 1 374 26 L 32 601 338 1 15 - L 27 15 25 327 4 r 161 259 % r 17 41 tr *1 tr m o . o Z� m A [tTv Of Federal Way 6/20/2006 Figure 26. 2009 Alternative 2 PM Peak Turning Volumes 1 TrenaPor�«on IPlennlne 6 Englnevrinp 67 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis AM Peak Hour Study Intersections a" co Federal Way Figure 26. 2009 Alternative 2 AM Peak Turning Volumes Y oad x.1- Piannir.ra 6 E pnen ono Mirai Transportation 68 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 272 St & Pacific Hwy S N S. 272 St & 1-5amp S. 272 S1 & I-51N13amp S.1272 S1 & Wilary Rd o - a 41 1 4 41 1 16 4J 1 4 v 4A 1 16 41 916 165 1 286 O L 158 227 0 j 1190 L Z O 0 414 641 d L 854 688 � 3 406 O 431 4 L 119 635 4 7394 L y f 28 Z r 220 252 S r 246 0 Z r 0 117 7 r 121 'a r 411r N m O N E 411r Q O O 411r _ 411r 411r .SjDash PdTnI17d& Paffic Hwy S _ 5316 St&Paclhc Hwy 41 94 m N V .1 14 4114 r 94 I d 94 J .6( � }• s 676 J 0 ; L Ot u p a s •i g }�. a s r{ q j. ASs 1'. s r 162 s r Q Z r s r .5! 42 titr N m 41tr �tr vtr 11 v M320 St & 1 Aw S [ [ & Pacitic My S S 320 51 & 20 Av v m .111. Jit4 .114 dl4 41i4 365 1 L 26 261 l L 72 1SL 1S1.6 1 L Or Or 123s 111 220s 133 7 r 7 s ! 411r 41tr 41tr 41tr 41tr a 32 I & 1-5 SIB -320 Ramp N O S 320 St & MmtaryRd S S 324 Si & Pacific Hwy S SW 336 St & 21 Av SW � N .114 41l4 41l4 4114 .1116 0 4 L 0 ! s ! s 1SL 1 sF 1608� �s �r �1127 • �]� ~ • � 1q 495s 197 4�r 7 ! s! s ! atr 0 0 0 41tr 41t1& 41tr 4t1b 5338St&Pacific -Hwy S SW 340 St & Hoy[ Rd SW SW Campus Dr&1Av5 S346St&I'acificHwy ' SY:356St321Av5 N � .114 o d l4 4114 4114 41l4 138 & 457 L 93 375 81 & 643 • L 22 Or 55 159 s 1 L 1 L 188s Jr 62 187s 81 41 tr v '1 tr m N h tr 41 tr 41tr 4114 41114 L l s r s r �tr �tr -k CITY OF Federal Way 6/20/2006 Figure 26. 2009 Alternative 2 AM Peak Turning Volumes 2 P1. 1� EnpInFM n0� Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Saturday Peak Hour Study Intersections S 2p2na St �i ` . S 3V8th`S1 000' 310fh 5t a 5 SW 312th St �.. sit 32ate St ii�i r.t�e err 5 320th St E-i.., a"c A Figure 27. 2009 Alternative 2 Saturday Federal Way Peak Turning Volumes 288th 5t h I•: Mh.St T�an.00�uc�on Piennine 6 Enp�nnnrinp Mirai Transportation 70 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S r S. 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramp IS. 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramp S. 272 S1 & Witary Rd S m cific PF � O 4.1114 0 0 0 .A14 .A116 2 J14 411114 113 1 113(::D 116 i 116 0 1 & L 0 477 1 477 & L 418 418 87 1 87 t 77 � L . 857 426 O! 16 �! 1L �! 540 1137 ! 417 286'4 156 0 'l 0 217'S 98 1 ! tr Nm� 41 tr ti tr ti tr a tM S 266 St & Military Rd S 5 Dash Point Rd &Pacific Hwy S '? 312 St & Pacifc Nwy 5 S 312 S[ & 26 Av S •316 t Paci is Hwy S N V ♦4 dly � .A14 d14 J94 1 `^ , L ♦ L 238 1 i 180 1 r^ , i 117 1 i 187 426 O r ! 9 I f 'S Q r % 159 4 ! 280 260 7 � : 245 4 245 ! 276 276 41 t M 41 t P ti t r N N 41 t r 42 it r N O SW 320 St & 21 Av S SW 320 St & 1 Av S S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 5 320 St & 20 Av S S 320 St & 23 Av S - 4114 .Ai4 v 4A14 .A14 4A14 � L 116 1 L 136 794 1 i 369 630 1 i 388 194 .�Si 404 j� 1368 1,`� 1099 1372 - 3 4- 1070 1381 '�Q 4- O 1427 1872 4- 2308 114 4 ! 399 57 Z ! 513 366 7 ! 505 75 3! 495 411P *1tr a v �n 411r N rn titr N N atr � M 5 320 St & 1-5 SB -320 Ramp N S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp St & Mi"Eary S 324 St & Pacific Hwy m � .A14 6 .�14 di4 _ 2 .�14 d14 0 1 L 0 0 1 i 119 1 L 137 184 L 2224 6 1860 O 1271 r 1372 $ 176 g O Sr 246 7Q 706 % ! 157 10g1 4 ! 0 7 s 132 % 322 Z ! titr 41tr 41tM 41tr �tM • .SW 340 bt & Hoyt Rd SVV m Campus Dr & 1 Av Si'manow 5'N.1,56 $1 & 21 AY S 41i16 mN o � m 14 A916 4114 4194 1 76 1 74 1 1 1 1 -0 'Zj 621 OL 22 376 y �L �► �� • • '1=j • �L 4 s 132 4 ! 199 7 s 7 s 4 P �tM titr m atr 41 �tM 356 St & Pacific Hwy S S 356 St ITindhanled Pkwy S d 14 .114 41 t M 41 t M C17Y OF Federal Way Figure 27. 2009 Alternative 2 Saturday Peak Turning Volumes 6/20/2006 71 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Table 23. 2009 Alternative 2 Intersection Or)erations 1. S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S F 1.09* D 0.71 D 0.75 2. S 272 St & 1-5 southbound F 1.03* C 0.73 C 0.62 Ramp 3. S 272 St & 1-5 northbound C 0.85 E 1.09* B 0.67 Ramp 4. S 272 St & Military Rd S F 1.27* F 1.10* D i,� 0.63 5. S 288th St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.81�y®� 6. S 288th St & Military Rd S C 0.77 --- 7. S Dash Point Rd &Pacific C 0.52 Hwy S 8. S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S E 1.05* D 0.98� 9. S312St&28AvS B 0.653 10. S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S E 1.06 11. SW 320 St & 21 Av SW D 0.78 .1 12. S 320 St & 1 Av S D 0.81 D 0.81 D 0.97 13. S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.91 F 1.01* 14. S 320 St & 20 Av S F 1.47* 15. S 320 St & 23 Av S D 0.76 F 1.05* 16. S 320 St & 1-5 southbound C 0.78 C 0.71 C 0.94 Ramp 17 S 320 St & I-5 northbound =WN 6 0.76 Ramp f 18. S 320 St & Military Rd S D 0.96 19. S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.86 D 0.87 20. SW 336 St & 21 Av SW L E 0.99 +'F 21. S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S ,�� D 1.05* _.Mmaimm C 0.69 =� 22. SW 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW � 0.63 B 0.53 ]IN_ CML 0.574 23. SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S 0� 0.96 24. S 348 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.80-- 25. SW 356 St & 21 Av SW C 0.84 ���-- 26. S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S C 0.83 ,,��--- 27. S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S D 0.82 ---- 'LOS reflects the overall operation of the intersection based on the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 methodology 2VIC is the combined volume%apacity of the critical movements of the intersection as identified as the X, in the HCM 2000 methodology. 3Maximum v/c ratio at all -way stop -controlled unsignalized intersection. *Results from HCM2000 Signals (version 4.10 2009 Alternative 2 Deficiencies This section describes the 2009 Alternative 2 deficiencies. The City of Federal Way defines the minimum acceptable level of service as LOS E or better with a volume/capacity ratio of less than 1.00 for signalized intersections. Intersections operating below this threshold are deficient. Mirai Transportation 72 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis PM Peak Hour Deficiencies — Five intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2009 for Alternative 2. Deficient intersections are focused along S 272 Street and Pacific Highway S, where growth in regional traffic is expected to affect intersection operations during the PM peak hour. AM Peak Hour Deficiencies — Two of the study intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2009 for Alternative 2. The deficient intersections are located at 1-5 northbound Ramp and Military Road S along S 272 Street. Saturday Peak Hour Deficiencies — Four of the Saturday study intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold in 2009 for Alternative 2. These intersections are 1 focused around the FWCC area, at S 316 Street and S 320 Street on Pacific Highway S, and at the intersections at 20 Avenue S and 23rd Avenue S on S 320 Street. Weekend retail activity at these locations is likely to contribute to the high traffic at these intersections. Parking Requirement Table 24 describes the increase in parking requirement for the Alternative 2 above the existing code requirements shown in Figure 10. A total of 11,486 spaces would be required to meet existing and future lane uses (same as Alternative 1). The parking requirements estimate the number of spaces required for the proposed mix of uses assumed for Alternative 2. Compared with Alternative 3, the City's parking code would require approximately 4,000 additional spaces for Alternative 2. These spaces may be f provided on the site or as part of parking garages assumed as part of the FWCC development. The actual parking requirement for an individual development may be reduced through shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management programs. This reduction could vary from 10% to 20%. Civic Uses Case by case 100,000 sf Unknown Unknown Hotel 1 per room 600 rooms 600 stalls 600 stalls Office 1 per 300 sf 350,000 sf 1,167 stalls 819 stalls Other 1 per 1000 sf 0 sf 0 stalls 0 stalls Residential 1.7 per unit 750 units 1,275 stalls 816 stalls a Retail 1 per 300 sf 750,000 sf 2,500 stalls 1,766 stalls J Total Additional 5,542 stalls 4,001 stalls Total Parking 11,486 stalls Source: Jones and Stokes Associates, 2005. (1)These parking demands may be 10% to 20% less based on shared parking. Traffic Safety Impact As the amount of traffic increases increase within the area, the probability of traffic collisions would be expected to increase. The City of Federal Way Comprehensive 6/20/2006 73 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Plan (2003 revision, Chapter 3, page III-7) identifies that congestion is a primary factor in collision rates. Alternative 2 would increase the number of trips at high collision locations, the number of trips associated with this alternative make up only a small proportion of the entering trips. Improvements associated with traffic improvement would reduce congestion and the congestion -associated collisions. Transit Service Impact Alternative 2 would provide a high level of urban development and amenities in area near the new 312th Street Transit Center. Under the alternative, development would occur throughout the FWCC, providing a high number of potential transit users who may walk to the Transit Center. Expected residents of the FWCC would likely include transit users. Pedestrian Accessibility The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2002 revision, Chapter 7) identifies a number of roadway and pedestrian improvements to occur as part of future development (see Figure 12). Alternative 2 concept of a pedestrian -oriented, mixed -use center would encourage use of these facilities, as residents would be able to easily access retail and service locations within a short walking distance. Bicycle Mobility Impact Chapter 7 of the 2002 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (see Figure 12) identifies bicycle facilities planned for the City Center area. These bicycle facilities would connect major destinations and would increase the mobility of bicyclists within the project area. New development under Alternative 2 would increase the demand for bicycle facilities in the project area. Impacts associated with development permitted through the Planned Action Ordinance would be addressed as described in the Additional Mitigation described on page 94. Proposed Mitigation Alternative 2 would increase the density and activity within the FWCC core, but would spread out the impact throughout the FWCC area. The increased density could increase traffic congestion; however, these increases may be offset by reduced vehicle travel demand resulting from mixed -use development, improvements to pedestrian facilities, and improved transit services. Based on the LOS analysis, the following additional improvements (those beyond improvements identified for Alternative 3) would be required under Alternative 2 to meet the City's LOS threshold. Table 25 identifies the intersection location, the LOS and v/c ratio and the suggested mitigation for each intersection. Appendix M contains the intersection analysis sheets for the 2009 PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for intersections mitigated in Alternative 2. Mirai Transportation 74 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis l I 1 Table 25. Alternative 2 Mitigation PM PEAK intersection 1 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 2 S 272 St & 1-5 souhbound Ramp 4 S 272 St & Military Rd S 8 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 21 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S I_161=- I'm: C•11T� 3 T S 272 St & 1-5 northbound Ramp 4 S 272 St & Military Rd S 2009 - Alternative 2 F 1.09* No mitigation proposed (1) F 1.00* No mitigation proposed (1) F 1.22* No mitigation proposed (2) D 0.95 Alternative 3 mitigation (CIP 01-05) D 0.93 Optimize signal timing 2009 - Alternative 2 E 1.09* No mitigation proposed (1) F 1.10* No mitigation proposed (2) SATURDAY 2009 - Alternative 2 intersection improvements 10 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S C 0.92 Eastbound right turn lane (TSM 12) 13 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S E 0.94* Northbound right turn lane 14 S 320 St & 20 Av S D 0.98 Alternative 3 mitigation (TSM 2) Alternative 3 mitigation (TSM 31 plus westbound right 15 S 320 St & 23 Av S E 0.93 turn lane *Results from HCM2000 Signals (version 4.10 (1) The City of Kent exempts intersections along Highways of Statewide Significance from their LOS threshold (2) King County requires mitigation of intersections that receive 30 trips in an hour and 20% of the proposed new trips and exceeds LOS F. Less than 2% of project trips access the King County intersection of Military Road/272nd Street. 6/20/2006 75 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 2014 Forecasts The 2014 forecasts are intended to provide an initial look at the traffic operations and impacts of each of the FWCC alternatives. This analysis will describe the forecasting methodology, describe expected roadway volumes for Alternatives 1-3 and identify locations where traffic growth may impact City's intersections. Because this is a longer range forecast, only roadway volumes are reported. In addition, specific mitigation measures are not included. The City has proposed to conduct a 2009 analysis of building construction and traffic growth to verify the status of the FWCC development and to update the traffic forecasts for 2014. Forecast Methodology Forecasts of the PM peak hour were completed using the EMME/2 transportation model. The model compares the 2009 and 2014 land uses to estimate future traffic levels and to assign the volumes to the roadway network. The model was used to identify the 2009-2014 growth in background traffic and the 2009-2014 growth in trips from the FWCC site. The AM and Saturday peak hour forecasts use the 2004-2009 traffic growth factors to estimate an expected 2014 background traffic. General background growth for the AM peak hour is assumed at 1.5% per year and 1.1 % for the Saturday peak hour. The FWCC trip generation for each alternative was assigned and added to the 2009 base volumes and 2009-2014 background growth traffic to provide an estimate of 2014 volumes. Appendix N includes the 2014 forecasted volumes for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Roadway Improvement Assumptions Only one roadway improvement project based on the CIP was added to the baseline model for 2014. This project would construct a roadway connection between S 312th Street at 14th Avenue S and S 320th Street at 11th Place S. Trip Generation Table 26 summarizes the growth in trip generation from 2009 to 2014. The 2014 forecasts include two options for a "Civic Center" resulting in a range of values for the trip generation. The first civic center option would develop a convention center facility that would be primarily be used for special events, expositions, and activities. The second civic center option would be a daily -use facility, which would feature daily activities and programs. The second option would be expected to have higher daily and peak hour trip generation. The estimates of growth for the 2009-2014 No Action (Alt 3) represents 70-90% of the growth expected from 2004-2009 as shown in Table 16. Alternatives 1 and 2 have the same trip generation. The range of trip generation reflects the two options for the Civic Mirai Transportation 76 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Center land use described above. The PM and Saturday peak hour trip growth is slightly lower than the growth during the 2004- 2009 time period. The AM trips represent 77% of the previous five-year growth. Table 26: Sum AM peak hour 919-1,073 919-1,073 214 Saturday peak hour 2,537-2,552 2,537-2,552 437 PM peak hour 2,360 — 2,370 2,360-2,370 419 Range of trip generation reflects two options for the Civic Center land use. Source: ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution and assignment were assumed to remain similar to 2009. The PM peak hour distribution was calculated using the EMME/2 model. The AM and Saturday trip distribution used the 2009 distribution of trips to assign the 2014 traffic growth on the network. 2014 No Action Traffic Volumes Figures 28 to 30 show the expected 2014 traffic volumes on selected roadways for the No Action Alternative (Alternative 3) for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. The volumes indicate higher traffic levels on area streets and roadways that may result in increased congestion at major intersections. The majority of traffic growth would be from 2009-2014 background growth associated with regional traffic and future development not associated with the FWCC. The FWCC No Action alternative adds only low levels of traffic to area roadways. Based on the trip generation, approximately 420 new PM peak hour trips would be added to area roadways. Impacts from the FWCC planning area are generally low, with the added 2009-2014 FWCC traffic growth accounting for less than 5% of traffic volumes at intersections. 6/20/2006 77 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 1 1J Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Nary �1370! 1? 1226 �'7 ^ S IM, 4•nk. :10 a` -- rCi 'O � LI w s � 3e-r. sti s low Ss c �, 53061h$ R s SYr3.7 �, p 5280 17 :1090� w Saa B9 � icba .a az*!;l 1834 • 1850 - 1870 `" 1950 K 5 s2+at Sl 1080_. .i310 1570t 1650 �yl Q Sw G p• S u'r C .N �N Sd Q18Q1 ESL 04D - P,y a Q S 7°p�R Sl 5 '115tf• nD h�l� i } 3601n � 90`0 s 15:;� r s• a 570 6 S City Center Volume O of Figure 28. 2014 Volumes — PM Peak Hour Federal Way — No action Tnenaoo���.on P l onn Inp s Enpnee.-ono Mirai Transportation 78 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis City Center Volume U"Of Figure 29. 2014 Volumes - AM Peak Hour Federal Way - No Action 79 T.-sn.poruaon Pionnino s Enpineerinp Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis City Center Volume �a A Figure 30. 2014 Volumes - Saturday Peak Federal Way Hour - No Action 1 Trar.aporr�uon Pimnnina G Englneerinp Mirai Transportation 80 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis rl 2014 Alternative 1 Traffic Volumes Figures 31 to 33 show the expected 2014 traffic volumes on selected roadways for the Alternative 1 during the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Because the land uses are concentrated along the S 320 Street corridor, the project trips generated for Alternative 1 would impact primarily intersections along this corridor. PM Peak Hour During the PM peak hour, the primary impact of Alternative 1 would be on roadways near and within the FWCC planning area. During the PM peak hour, the alternative would add nearly 2,400 total trips to area roadways, concentrated on S 320 Street and Pacific Highway S. The following intersections would be impacted by the alternative: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S (1260 additional trips) • S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S (910 additional trips) . S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S (870 additional trips) • S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S (780 additional trips) S 320 St & Military Rd S (750 additional trips) ■ S 320 St & 23 Av S (740 additional trips) AM Peak Hour During the AM peak hour, Alternative 1 volumes would be on roadways near and within the FWCC planning area. During the AM peak hour, nearly 1,100 trips to area roadways would be added, concentrated on roads near the FWCC, especially on S 320 Street. Intersections that would see the greatest impact from the alternative would be: S 320 St & 1-5 southbound - 320 Ramp (510 additional trips) .� S 320 St & 1 Av S (380 additional trips) • S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S (370 additional trips) • S 272 St & Pacific Highway S (340 additional trips) �} Saturday Peak Hour Alternative 1 would add 2,500 trips to area roadways, mainly within and adjacent to the -� FWCC. The following intersections would see the greatest impact from the alternative ,j during the Saturday peak hour: • S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S (1370 additional trips) �} • S 320 St & 20 Av S (1220 additional trips) • S 320 St & 23 Av S (980 additional trips) • S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S (910 additional trips) �} • S 320 St & 1-5 southbound - 320 Ramp (870 additional trips) • S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S (850 additional trips) 6/20/2006 81 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis M City Center Volume ana Figure 31. 2014 Volumes — PM Peak Hour Federal Way - Alternative 1 • Tr-arnaoo�cauon P�= nine s Ene�nea.-inp Mirai Transportation 82 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis City Center Volume CIOf Figure 32. 2014 Volumes - AM Peak Hour Federal Way - Alternative 1 Tranaponcaaon Pionnine s Ene�ne.,.-inQ 6/20/2006 83 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis City Center 600 Volurne ana Figure 33. 2014 Volumes — Saturday Peak Federal Way Hour — Alternative 1 Tra sports .on P o nine s Ene,neen�na Mirai Transportation 84 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 2014 Alternative 2 Traffic Volumes Figures 34 to 36 show the expected 2014 traffic volumes on selected roadways for the Alternative 2 for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. The project trips generated for Alternative 2 are assumed identical to Alternative 1, but assume that development is spread throughout the FWCC area. PM Peak Hour During the PM peak hour, the primary impact of Alternative 2 would be on roadways near and within the FWCC planning area. During the PM peak hour, the alternative would add nearly 2,400 trips to area roadways, concentrated on roads near the FWCC. The following intersections would see the greatest impact from the alternative: • S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S (1180 additional trips) • S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S (880 additional trips) • S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S (860 additional trips) • S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S (740 additional trips) • S 320 St & Military Rd S (700 additional trips) S 320 St & 23 Av S (670 additional trips) AM Peak Hour During the AM peak hour, Alternative 2 volumes would be on roadways near and within the FWCC planning area. During the AM peak hour, the alternative would add nearly 1,100 trips to area roadways, concentrated on roads near the FWCC. Intersections that would see the greatest impact from the alternative would be: • S 320 St & 1-5 southbound - 320 Ramp (520 additional trips) • S 320 St & 1 Av S (380 additional trips) • S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S (370 additional trips) • S 272 St & Pacific Highway S (340 additional trips) Saturday Peak Hour Alternative 2 would add 2,500 trips to area roadways, mainly within and adjacent to the FWCC. The following intersections would see the greatest impact from the alternative during the Saturday peak hour: • S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S (1370 additional trips) • S 320 St & 20 Av S (1160 additional trips) • S 320 St & 23 Av S (1010 additional trips) • S 320 St & 1-5 southbound - 320 Ramp (910 additional trips) • S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S (890 additional trips) • S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S (880 additional trips) 6/20/2006 85 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis City Center Volume CITY OF Figure 34. 2014 Volumes — PM Peak Hour Federal Way — Alternative 2 " T�a ��o���•o� Pie 6 6 Eneneernp Mirai Transportation 86 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis City Center 6061 Volume esrrcr A Figure 35. 2014 Volumes - AM Peak Hour Federal Way - Alternative 2 Tronaoorvcion P�mnnlnp 6 Ene�nee ono 6/20/2006 87 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis City Center Volume CITY OF A Figure 36. 2014 Volumes — Saturday Peak Federal Way Hour — Alternative 2 T.-anaoo.-canon n,I Ene s nB�neerInB Mirai Transportation 88 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Mitigation Mitigation for the FWCC project identifies the actions necessary to meet the City's LOS threshold for study intersections. The mitigation in this section is divided into PM Peak, AM Peak, and Saturday peak hours to isolate the impacts of each of these intersection locations. The specific level of mitigation necessary for any particular future development project will be determined during the City's project review and based on an analysis of site access. However, only mitigation measures included in this EIS and incorporated into the City Council -approved Planned Action Ordinance will be required. to address off -site impacts. The specific dollar amount of any required mitigation contribution will be on the basis of proportional impacts at rates to be determined by City Council. All mitigation measures suggested in this report are subject to the review and approval of City staff and the Federal Way City Council. Mitigation Cost Assumptions The following assumptions were used to estimate the costs of mitigation improvements_ For purposes of this analysis, costs were factored using a 3.0% annual growth rate to estimate 2009 costs. Table 27. Mitiaation Cost Assumptions Construction 1. Widening in City Center or on state highways $89/S 2. Widening in other commercial zones $76/SF 3. Widening elsewhere $63/SF 4. Shoulder widening $13/SF 5. Lighting $66/LF 6. Signal Pole Relocation $69,000/EA 7. Retaining Wall $127/SF 8. New Signal $228,000/EA 9. Mobilization 8.0% of construction Right of Way 1. Right of way $44/SF 2. Parcel purchase Market Value 3. Parking stalls loss $5,000/EA Project Development 1. Permitting 5% of construction 2. Contingency 30% of construction 3. Design 25% of construction 4. Construction Eng 15% of construction 5. Stormwater 20% of construction Costs estimates developed in consultation with the City of Federal Way Department of Public Works. 2004 to 2009 assumed 3% annual growth factor for the cost for construction and materials. 6/20/2006 89 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Mitigation Improvements Mitigation improvements for this study were based on projects identified by the City through their capital improvement planning process and other area planning projects. Sources of mitigation improvements for the intersections include: • 2009-2020 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) • 2030 City Center Access Study (2005) —Traffic Systems Management (TSM) Projects Other mitigation improvements were based on the results of the LOS analysis. These improvements include: signal optimization and addition of turn lanes. All mitigation improvements were identified for feasibility and reviewed by City staff. In some cases, mitigation actions may not be feasible, reasonable, or desirable. In these cases, mitigation may require changes in current policies or result in undesired consequences, such as long vehicle delays or pedestrians access issues. While there may be actions that could bring an intersection to the City's LOS threshold, investigation of these mitigation actions fall outside the scope of this analysis and would require policy changes by the City or State to implement. Examples of these types of mitigation include: • The cycle length to extend beyond a 120 second cycle • Relocation or removal of businesses • Triple turn lanes at major intersections • Additional through lanes on a major thoroughfare ■ Conversion of HOV lanes to be used for general purpose travel on Saturdays • Limits on turning movements at an intersection (no left turn) ■ Development of parallel travel routes • Changes to physical topography All mitigation measures suggested in this report are recommended actions, subject to the review and approval of City staff, and adoption by City Council. Comparison of Alternatives The following section provides a comparison of the mitigation needed for the No Action and Action alternatives. For each study period, mitigation improvements are provided along with an estimated 2009 cost. Costs indicated reflect costs calculated in the 2009- 2020 Capital Improvement Plan or were estimated based on the project cost assumptions provided by the City. Estimated costs include right-of-way purchases necessary to develop the roadway to meet the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Mirai Transportation 90 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering I Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Plan (2003 revision, Chapter 3) Planned Street Sections (Figure III-3). All costs represent the cost of construction, right-of-way acquisition, and design and engineering. The costs do not include environmental mitigation, utility improvements or relocation, or financing. The mitigation for Alternatives 1 and 2 represents improvements that are needed, in addition, to the No Action (Alternative 3) improvements. PM Peak Hour For the PM peak hour, improvements would be needed to meet the City's LOS standard for the No Action alternative. Optimization of signal timing is assumed to occur as part of future City signal coordination activities. No further improvements are required during the PM peak hour for Alternative 1 and 2. Table 28 indicates the PM peak hour improvements identified for the three alternatives. Table 28. PM Peak Hour 2009 Mit aIntersection PM Alternative 3 — No Action ion 8 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Add 2nd northbound left turn lane (CIP 01-05) 21 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Optimize signal timing Alternative 3 Total PM Alternative 1 — Additional Mitigation 8 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S No Additional Improvements Required 21 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S No Additional Improvements Required Alternative 1 Additional Mitigation" PM Alternative 2 — Additional Mitigation" 8 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S No Additional Improvements Required � 7 $ 2,080a 0 $ 2,080 0 0 $ 0 0 ' 21 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S No Additional Improvements Required _ Alternative 2 Additional Mitigation" $ a Estimate provided by the City of Federal Way factored to 2009. b in addition, No Action (Alternative 3) mitigation improvements would be required for this alternative. 0 0 The final mitigation improvements for the FWCC would be reviewed and adopted by City Council. As identified in this study, Alternatives 1 and 2 would require no additional mitigation over actions needed for the No Action alternative. The No Action mitigation would be approximately $2.1 million. FWCC development may be required to fund a proportional share of the No Action Alternative improvements. 6/20/2006 91 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis AM Peak Hour As shown in Table 29, no additional mitigation is required for the AM peak hour, assuming the completion of the PM peak hour mitigation indicated in Table 28. Table 29. AM Peak Hour 2009 Mitigation rIntersection Improvement 2009 Cost 00i AM Alternative 3 Mitigation -% No mitigation required Alternative 3 Total $ 0 AM Alternative 1 Additional Mitigation No mitigation required Alternative 1 Additional Mitigation $ AM Alternative 2 Additional Mitigation No mitigation required Alternative 2 Additional Mitigation $ Saturday Peak Hour Table 30 lists the Saturday peak hour mitigation improvements. The City's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses (June 2004) does not specifically address mitigation for the Saturday peak hour. The City Council would need to make a policy decision on whether the Guidelines apply to time periods outside of the PM peak hour. Assuming mitigation is necessary, the identified improvements for the FWCC would be reviewed and adopted by City Council. As identified in this study, the Saturday peak hour analysis assumes the completion of the PM peak hour improvements indicated above. Tables 28-30 indicate planning level cost estimates for roadway improvements and right-of-way acquisition to meet the City of Federal Way's Planned Street Sections described in the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision, Chapter 3). In some cases, right-of-way acquisition is minor, with impacts to a small portion of undeveloped parcels. In others, acquiring the right-of-way may result in a full parcel takes as the acquisition would adversely impact the existing business. Final determination of the need for full parcel takes will depend on the benefit of the improvement, the ability to deviate from the City Planned Street Section, and consideration of alternatives such as centerline relocation and other planned roadway improvement projects. Most of the Saturday mitigation would be required for the No Action alternative. Two options are provided for construction of the northbound right turn lane at S. 320th Street and 20th Avenue S intersection. The first option relocates a proposed sidewalk to the west of a future but permitted building, eliminating the need for a full building take. The second option purchases the building and constructs the sidewalk within the roadway right-of-way. The difference between the two options is estimated at $2.6 million. The Mirai Transportation 92 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis range of costs for the No Action alternative would be approximately $2.5 million to $5.2 million. Alternatives 1 and 2 would require $3.2 million of additional improvements amounting to a total (including Alternative 3) of approximately $5.7-$8.4 million. Table 30. Saturday Peak Hour 2009 M aIntersection Saturday Alternative 3 Mitigation Northbound right turn lane (TSM 2) Option 1 14 S 320 St & 20 Av S Northbound right turn lane (TSM 2) Option 2 Southbound right turn lane 15 S 320 St & 23 Av S Second northbound right turn lane. (TSM 3) Alternative 3 Total Saturday Alternative 1 Additional Mitigation* 10 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S Eastbound right turn lane (TSM 12) 13 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Northbound right turn lane 14 S 320 St & 20 Av S No Additional Improvements Required 15 S 320 St & 23 Av S Westbound right turn lane Alternative 1 Additional Mitigation* Saturday Alternative 2 Additional Mitigation* 10 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S Eastbound right turn lane (TSM 12) 13 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Northbound right turn lane 521 3,170 1,029 1,003 $ 2,553-5,202 $ 717 729 0 1,737 $ 3,183 $ 717 729 14 S 320 St & 20 Av S No Additional Improvements Required 0 15 S 320 St & 23 Av S Westbound right turn lane 1,737 Alternative 2 Additional Mitigation* $ 3,183 *In addition, No Action (Alternative 3) mitigation improvements would be required for this alternative. Timing of Implementation Mitigation improvements for the area will depend on the location and rate of development within the FWCC. In addition, the timing of projects will depend also on the whether Saturday projects will be mitigated to the PM Peak hour thresholds. PM peak hour improvements are the highest priority, because Saturday and AM peak hour analyses assumed the completion of the PM peak hour projects. All projects identified for the selected FWCC alternative will be needed by 2010 to meet the City's transportation threshold for the expected level of development. Table 31 shows the expected intersection operations after completion activities. With the improvements, intersections within the jurisdiction of the City of Federal Way will meet the LOS E and less than 1.0 volume -to -capacity threshold. 6/20/2006 93 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering .J Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Table 31. Intersection 1 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S F 1.101'3 F 1.09'-3 F 1.09" 2 S 272 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp F 1.021,3 F 1.001.3 F 1.00'-3 4 S 272 St & Military Rd S F 1.241-3 F 1.22''3 F 1.221-3 8 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.95 D 0.95 D 0.95 21 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.92 D 0.93 D 0.93 ID Intersection • • • 3 S. 272 St & 1-5 northbound Ramp (WSDOT) E 1.08''3 E 1.091.3 E 1.09"3 4 S. 272 St & Military Rd S (City of Kent) F 1.091'3 F 1.101.3 F 1.101'3 SATURDAY Mitigated.. •. Mitigated 10 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S — ` — D 0.92 C 0.92 13 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S __2 --1 E 0.96 E 0.94' 14 S 320 St & 20 Av S D 0.95 D 0.99 D 0.99 15 S 320 St & 23 Av S E 0.92' E 0.92 E 0.93 1. Results from HCM2000 Signals (version 4.10 2. Meets City's threshold without mitigation 3. Does not trigger other jurisdictions threshold for mitigation Additional Mitigation The mitigation identified in this analysis is focused on the roadway improvements necessary to meet the expected travel demand on area roadways associated with the proposed development in the project area. Development will also need to meet the requirements of applicable codes at the time of application. Such requirements might include the dedication of right-of-way, installing curbs gutters and sidewalks, drainage improvements, and other requirements of the City. Additional mitigation may be required for individual development applications within the project area in order to reduce area traffic impacts or improve on -site circulation and to meet City and State requirements for Commute Trip Reduction and Transportation Demand Management. Actions to be considered include: On -site improvements — Driveway and circulation actions to minimize impact on area roadways. Actions may include management of access points, traffic control measures, construction of internal roadways, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, and connections to adjacent developments. Non Motorized mode improvements — Mitigation may be required per site specific and land use development proposals to address pedestrian, bicycle, and transit improvements to support the plans, policies, and goals as noted within the City of Mirai Transportation 94 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Federal Way Comprehensive Plan City Center Element (2002, Chapter 7) and Transportation Element (2003, Chapter 3). Grid Roadway Development — Part of the City Center Plan is to develop a number of internal roadways (see Figure 11 in Appendix 2) to create smaller blocks that will improve the grid network and improve the access for pedestrians and vehicles. Right- of-way dedication and street improvements shall be a component of the development submittal phase of a proposed project within the project area. Roadways within the project area must meet specific "City Center" design standards as specified in the Transportation Element (Chapter 3) of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision, Figure III-3) Right-of-way Dedication — Right-of-way dedication and frontage improvements may be required in conjunction with proposed developments. Roadways within the project area must meet specific "City Center" design standards as specified in the Transportation Element (Chapter 3) of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision, Figure III-3). Transportation Demand Management (TDM) — TDM actions can be used to reduce the impact of the project and as a mitigation action. These actions may include provision of transit passes to tenants and employees, ridesharing programs, priority carpool parking, and guaranteed ride home programs. TDM actions are designed to primarily address commute trips and may not be applicable as mitigation for all developments. Table 111-13 (page 60) of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision, Chapter 3, Transportation Element) stratifies various TDM alternatives by their functional grouping and potential effectiveness, implementation difficulties, and expected cost effectiveness. These strategies include: Telecommuting, Parking Pricing and Subsidy Removal, Compressed Work Week, Employer -Based Management, and Parking Supply Strategies. Based upon the above, the following are a list of recommended mitigation measures that can be considered in conjunction with individual development projects within the project area: 6/20/2006 Encourage voluntary expansion of the CTR Program to employers of less than 100 employees. The encouragement by employers may be as diverse as subsidized bus passes, car pool space priority, bike racks, shower facilities, van pools, car pool information access, telecommuting, variable work hours, etc. 2. Encourage the formation and expansion of area -wide ride -sharing programs. Such programs operate with little direct cost to the City and are highly cost- effective. 3. Support the enhancement of Park and Ride facilities and transit centers to supplement the regional system, either directly through physical development or enhancements or indirectly through development conditions where employer vans are required to shuttle employees to Park and Ride facilities or transit centers. 95 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis 4. Facilitate enhancements to the HOV system. This may include the dedication of property for HOV lanes, construction of arterial HOV lanes within existing City ROW, and priority treatments for buses at traffic signals. At the very least, where feasible, opportunities to enhance access to the State system of HOV lanes should be considered. 5. Achieve increased densities and mix of uses to support public transportation, decrease trip generation and parking impacts. 6. Encourage facilities (shelters, loading spaces, etc) to accommodate City Center shuttle service in association with development projects, together with enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access and security. 7. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access to bus routes and transit centers. This can be a requirement of subdivision, development, and redevelopment. The City may need to acquire easements and construct trail connections. Development incentives could be granted for providing such amenities that are pedestrian, bike, and transit friendly. While bicycle, pedestrian, and bus transit services and facilities may be desirable for other reasons; they should not be looked on as highly cost-effective strategies to the exclusion of those actions listed above. Neighborhood Traffic Control — Development within the project area may be required to include actions to reduce the impact of cut through traffic on residential areas. Examples of neighborhood traffic control actions include: turn restrictions, speed controls, traffic enforcement, and parking restrictions. The following mitigation recommended shall support the following City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision) Transportation Element (Chapter 3): Minimize through traffic on residential streets by maximizing through travel opportunities on arterial and collector streets. Employ traffic calming measures in neighborhoods (where feasible) where traffic volumes and speeds on local streets consistently exceed reasonable levels. Improve safety on residential streets by: a. Reducing street widths while maintaining on -street parking. b. Increasing separation between sidewalks and streets. c. Reducing design speeds to discourage speeding. d. Limiting the length of straight streets to discourage speeding. e. Discouraging the use of four -legged intersections. Keep through traffic to state routes and arterials. Discourage the use of local or neighborhood streets for through movements (unless part of an overall process of creating a street grid). Mirai Transportation 96 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Parking — Mitigation actions that reduce the parking requirements within the project area should be encouraged. Examples include shared parking, employee parking programs, parking time restrictions, paid parking programs. Shared parking strategies focus on looking at opportunities where adjacent uses have parking demand profiles that can support the sharing of a smaller amount of parking spaces. For example, an office building with an 8 AM to 5 PM demand could share its parking with evening dominated uses such as restaurants, or a cinema. A parking demand study, which shows the hourly parking demand profiles for adjacent uses and the potential for joint parking opportunities within a mixed -use development, can be used to reduce the number of parking spaces. In addition, contained in the above TDM mitigation are strategies that overlap with parking mitigation plans for development. A development may propose a plan and management system to the City for approval upon submittal of the development permit. Those items may contain the following in support of the City of Federal Way and state Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) requirements: ALTERNATIVE MODE SUPPORT MEASURES Public education and promotion may increase the effectiveness of these other strategies up to 3%. Area -wide Ride matching Services — May result in a 0.1-3.6% reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and an up to 2.5% VMT reduction in transit services. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Vanpool Service — May result in an up to 8.3% in commute VMT, as well as a reduction in transit and vanpool fares up to 2.5%. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Non -Motorized Modes plan and implementation — May result in an up to 0-2% regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. HOV Facilities — May result in an up to 1.5% VMT reduction and 0.2% vehicle trip reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. On site development of Park and Ride program — May result in up to 0-0.5% VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. EMPLOYER -BASED TDM MEASURES Parking mitigation -- Monetary incentives may result in an up to 8-18% trip reduction at site. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. 6/20/2006 97 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Alternative Work Schedules — May result in as much as a 1 % regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip - generation rates. Commute Support Programs — May result in up to 0.1-2.0% regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip - generation rates. Parking Management— May result in up to a 20 to 30% reduction in SOV trips to/from the site. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Telecommuting — Up to 10% commute VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. OTHER STRATEGIES Parking Tax— May result in up to a 1 to 5% reduction in regional VMT and trip generation, but requires City Council and/or legislative action. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Development Parking Impact Mitigation — Requires Council approval to allow for payment of parking -mitigation funds towards long term investments in structured parking solutions in lieu of full parking requirement. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Mixed Land Use/Jobs Housing Balance — May result in VMT reductions up to 10%. Parking stall credit is given based on overlapping shared usage of mixed facility, per City Code provisions. Transit -Oriented and Pedestrian -Friendly Design — Site and building design that encourages transit usage and/or walking may reduce overall parking requirement. Requires design review and staff approval. Employment Center Density - Achievement of sufficient density within the City Center to constitute a regional employment center may reduce SOV work trips to individual development projects by up to 50%. Parking stall reductions may also apply to developments. Other Parking Management Plans — May mitigate 1 to 5% region -wide VMT, provided enforcement issues are addressed in the mitigation plan. Mira! Transportation 98 6/20/2006 Planning & Engineering City of Federal Way OTY at Federal ay Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Appendices June 8, 2006 List of Appendices AppendixA. Scope of Work........................................................................................................3 Appendix B. Summary of Model Development.........................................................................19 Appendix C. Study Intersections...........................................................................................•---.31 Appendix D. Traffic Count Data................................................................................................37 Appendix E. 2004 Intersection Analysis Results.......................................................................41 AppendixF. Collision Data.......................................................................................................89 AppendixG. 2009 Forecasts......................................................................................................95 Appendix H. 2009 Baseline Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 3 ..........................107 Appendix I. 2009 Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 3 - Mitigated ......................155 Appendix J. 2009 Baseline Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 1 ..........................161 Appendix K. 2009 Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 1 - Mitigated ......................209 Appendix L. 2009 Baseline Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 2 ..........................217 Appendix M. 2009 Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 2 - Mitigated ......................265 AppendixN. 2014 Forecasts....................................................................................................273 1 Blank -1 } } Appendix A. Scope of Work The attached document is the scope of work for the project, as amended through ° 7/29/03. The scope of work is organized around four tasks that describe the steps of the process. The scope provides an overview of the steps taken and the -� intent and objectives of this analysis. Agreements between the consulting team and the City resulted in task clarification, changes to scope tasks, and additional emphasis as required. Documents: } 1. Transportation Scope of Federal Way City Center Planned Action SEPA, as amended (July 29, 2003). 3 Blank Transportation Scope for Federal Way City Center Planned Action SEPA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Transportation impact Analysis (TIA) for the City Center Planned Action SEPA. The Planned Action SEPA shall analyze (1) No Action and (2) two build development alternatives per the "Planning Envelope" for changes in land use as described in the Requests for Proposals (RFP) for the City of Federal Way's City Center. The CONSULTANT shall prepare draft and final documents using the City of Federal Way's `Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analysis', Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) methodology, and the City of Federal Way standards as adopted in the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The CONSULTANT shall prepare and finalize the TIA, which shall bear the seal of the responsible Professional Engineer as licensed in the State of Washington experienced in Traffic Engineering. The TIA shall conforming to the following: TASK A-1 DETERMINATION OF THE BASE YEAR, HORIZON YEARS, AND STUDY AREA Base year weekday 2004 traffic model is the existing 2002 EM1ME/2 Traffic Model as prepared for the City of Federal Way Traffic Impact Fee Traffic (TIF) model. The current model is a PM peak hour model. The CONSULTANT shall perform additional calibration on the existing model to reflect 2003/2004 traffic count data. The CONSULTANT will prepare an AM peak hour model using either an EMME/2 or Synchro methodology, at the City's selection. The City shall approve the AM peak hour methodology prior to beginning this work activity. Base year Saturday 2004 conditions shall be created by the CONSULTANT, utilizing the City's existing Saturday data, for a Synchro traffic model reflecting Saturday conditions. The CONSULTANT shall review the city's existing inventory of traffic data collection and identify the number of intersections that will require new traffic counts. The CONSULTANT shall collect new traffic counts at any intersections and time periods older than 2001. It is estimated that 25 new intersections counts (weekday AM and PM peak hour) and 15 Saturday peak hour intersection counts will be required_ The CONSULTANT acknowledges within this contract the CITY will complete under a separate contract 2003 traffic counts as provided by the CITY estimated for completion by December of 2003, available for use by the CONSULTANT if permitted by the contract schedule. Parking pricing withi the City limits is to be removed and not used in any traffic models for the TIA. GV Trip distribution and trip tables for each alternative shall contain Saturday trip generation rates estimated using the current I.T.E for land use codes. Where I.T.E. rates are not identified for the City Center future Iand uses (e.g. parking structure garages, public facilities ), the CONSULTANT shall use available recent data prepared for a similar land use and traffic conditions. The CONSULTANT will submit three (3) reports that support the recommended trip generation data to the City for approval prior to use in the transportation modeling. Any reports that document the data shall be submitted as a document attachment to the final TIA as the backup documentation for trip distributions and those assumptions. Horizon year (AM ,PM, Saturday) is the future forecast year at which the future conditions without the proposed development are compared to future conditions with the proposed development in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development on the levels of service (LOS) and volume to capacity (v/c) ratios. The three alternatives are the proposed development. The horizon year for each phase of the development shall be the greatest extent of the conditions. The horizon year is 2009 and 2014. The CONSULTANT shall utilize the current 2009 EMNE/2 traffic model as prepared for the City of Federal Way's TIF containing the 2004-2009 TIP proposed improvement projects. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a 2009 Synchro AM and Saturday Peak hour peak hour traffic model for the 2009 horizon year containing the 2004-2009 TIP in Synchro utilizing historic traffic growth rate trends or an approved alternatives. EMME/2 modeling will be substituted for the AM 2009 model at the city's request. The CONSULTANT shall develop 2014 EMME/2 traffic for AM and PM weekday peak hour traffic volumes and Synchro Saturday peak hour volumes model without a projection of new improvement projects after 2009. The 2014 Saturday Synchro traffic models shall use projected historic traffic growth rates from the year 2009-2014. The CONSULTANT shall use the latest Market Analysis land use for the 2014 Emme/2 model. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a TASK A-1A that reflects a breakdown of all AM EMME/2 traffic model work estimate of labor and hours to be reviewed and approved by the CITY and a TASK A-1B that shows all AM traffic model work as prepared in an alternative traffic model Synchro. The CITY will review both task items and select one for this contract. The CONSULTANT shall prepare trip distribution for the proposed alternatives for the 2009 horizon year as a first order of work prior to commencing on additional activities of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall confirm the study area of traffic impacts for the (3) Three Alternatives of the City Center Planned Action SEPA under TASK A-1. The CONSULTANT shall prepare all documents for review and approval of the study area by the CITY prior to work on additional tasks. 6 2 The CONSULTANT shall analyze base year 2004 and future year 2009 impacts of the City Center proposal with assuming the same land use scenario as provided within the City of Federal Way TIP Traffic Model, and (3) Three alternatives that reallocates the same magnitude of land use within the City Center study area as assigned to each alternative. The CONSULTANT shall produce traffic forecasts for each of the three time periods identified. New trip generation surveys will not be conducted. Volume Capacity (V/C) Ratios shall be completed in Task A-1 for the base year (2004) and 2009 traffic models. The VIC ratios, at intersections, will be used to identify those intersections that are expected to be impacted by the City Center alternatives. Distribution and Volume Capacity (VAC Ratio level of work: • Weekday PM peak hour distribution and V/C Ratios to 10 PM Peak hour trips over background existing 2004 traffic model and the horizon year 2009 traffic model. • Weekday AM peak hour distribution and V/C Ratios to 100 AM Peak hour trips over background existing 2004 traffic model and the horizon year 2009 traffic model. • Saturday peak hour distribution and WC Ratios to 100 Saturday Peak hour trips over background existing 2004 traffic model and the horizon year 2009 traffic model. Task A-1-Content Requirements Project description and definitions of the proposed (3) Three Alternatives for the City Center Planned Action SEPA. I. Inventory Existing and Proposed Alternate Land Uses A. Existing Land Use 1. Inventory of land use within City Center 2. Site physical characteristics B. Proposed Alternate Land Uses 1. (3) Three Alternative Land Uses proposed. 2. Zone locations for alternative land uses as proposed. 3. Other developments approved in the vicinity as provided by the CITY. II. Inventory Existing and Planned Transportation System 7 A. Scope of the Traffic Impact Analysis (Study Area) - The CONSULTANT will describe the location of the proposed facilities and existing facilities impacted by increased traffic. Increased traffic is defined as 10 or more trips in both directions during the PM week day peak hours, 100 or more trips in both directions during AM week day peak hours, and 100 or more trips in both directions during Saturday peak hours. The City shall select the intersections to be analyzed using these thresholds and a review of the intersection V/C analysis conducted for 2004 and 2009 conditions. Some intersections may be added or removed from the analysis list depending upon the results of the V/C analysis. The analysis periods analyzed by the CONSULTANT shall be: ➢ AM (morning) weekday peak hour traffic. ➢ PM (evening) weekday peak hour traffic. ➢ Saturday (afternoon) weekend peak hour traffic. The CONSULTANT shall review existing Saturday traffic data as provided by the CITY to determine Saturday peak hours. The CITY will review the Saturday peak hour determination. The CONSULTANT shall review the City's existing traffic data to determine the peak hours for AM and PM (Week day). The City will review the AM and PM (Week day) determination. The deliverable shall provide trip distributions out to the required peak hour trips and show 2009 volumes for the (3) alternatives as well as the volume to capacity ratios. The 2014 traffic model shall only reflect traffic volumes. The CONSULTANT shall provide recommendations on the number of intersections to include in the LOS analysis under TASK A-2 based upon the preliminary volume to capacity ratios. The CITY will review the deliverables and identify the number of areas for further analysis under TASK A-2. The following tables summarize the deliverables under TASK A-1. "2004 BASE YEAR MODEL — 2009 HORIZON YEAR MODEL" Alternatives are 6/10 of the "planning envelope" land use assumptions. 2004 2009 (*2 model runs each — typical) PM Peak Hour: EMME/2 model - Trip Distribution out to lA PM Synchro model - Existing 2003 PM peak hour 1� hour week day trips through out the City for r Alternative No.1 over tot) of the 2009 pLepared 8 4 traffic counts plus changes in traffic network traffic model as the horizon year. expected by 2004 plus approved development V/C ratios shall be calculated out to 10 PM peak and/or public projects. hour trip distribution for Alternative No. 1. V/C ratios shall be calculated for all intersections The 2009 traffic model for the horizon year shall identified in 2009 analysis . show V/C ratios for the forecasted conditions and the forecasted conditions with Alternative No. 1. AM Peak Hour: Synchro-or Eh4hW2 model-= Trip -Distribution out Synchro model - Existing 2003 AM peak hour to 100 AM peak hour week day trips through out the City for Alternative No.1 over top of the 2009 traffic counts plus changes in traffic network prepared traffic model as the horizon year. expected by 2004 plus approved development and/or public projects. V/C ratios shall be calculated out to 100 AM peak V/C ratios shall be calculated for all hour trip distributions for Alternative No. 1. intersections identified in 2009 analysis. The 2009 traffic model for the horizon year shall show V/C ratios for the forecasted conditions and the forecasted conditions with Alternative No. 1. Saturday Peak Hour: Synchro model - Trip Distribution out to 100 peak Synchro model - Existing 2003 Saturday peak hour hour Saturday trips through out the City for Alternative No. 1 over top of the 2009 prepared traffic counts plus changes in traffic network traffic model as the horizon year. expected by 2004 plus approved development and/or public projects. V/C ratios shall be calculated out to 100 Saturday V/C ratios shall be calculated for all peak hour trips for Alternative No. 1. intersections identified in 2009 analysis. The 2009 traffic model for the horizon year shall show V/C ratios for the forecasted conditions and the forecasted conditions with Alternative No. 1. EMME/2 model - Trip Distribution out to 10 PM peak hour weekday trips through out the City for Alternative No. 2 over top of the 2009 prepared traffic model as the horizon year. V/C ratios shall be calculated out to 10 PM peak hour trip distribution for Alternative No. 2. The 2009 traffic model for the horizon year shall show WC ratios for the forecasted conditions and the forecasted conditions with Alternative No. 2. Synchro or EMME/2 model - Trip Distribution out to 100 AM peak hour week day trips through out f the City for Alternative No. 2 over top of the 2009 I1 prepared traffic model as the horizon year. V/C ratios shall be calculated out to 100 AM peak hour trip distribution for Alternative No. 2. The 2009 traffic model for the horizon year shall show V/C ratios for the forecasted conditions and the forecasted conditions with Alternative No. 2. Synchro model — Trip Distribution out to 100 Saturday peak hour Alternative No. 2 over top of the 2009 prepared traffic model as the horizon year. V/C ratios shall be calculated out to 100Saturday peak hour trip distribution for Alternative No. 2. The 2009 traffic model for the horizon year shall show V/C ratios for the forecasted conditions and the forecasted conditions with Alternative No. 2. EMME/2 model - Alternative 3 "No action" shall reflect no net change to the forecasted conditions of the prepared 2009 traffic model for the PM weekday peak hour. The forecasted conditions - 2009 traffic model shall show forecasted LOS and V/C at the intersections identified by both Alternatives through their respected trip distributions Synchro or EMME/2 model - Alternative 3 "No action" shall reflect no net change to the forecasted conditions of the prepared 2009 traffic model for the AM weekday peak hour. The forecasted conditions - 2009 traffic model shall show forecasted LOS and V/C at the intersections identified by both Alternatives through their respected trip distributions Synchro model - AIternative 3 "No action" shall reflect no net change to the forecasted conditions of the prepared 2009 traffic model for the Saturday peak hour. The forecasted conditions - 2009 traffic model shall show forecasted LOS and V/C at the intersections identified by both Alternatives through their respected trip distributions "REALITY CHECK ESTIMATE Of TRAFFIC IMPACTS" 2009-2014 4/10 of the land use proposals of the "Planning Envelope" remaining to reach full build out in the year 2014. 2014 traffic model horizon year estimates at a planning level for a total of 9 Maps showing estimated future volumes. 10 6 EMME/2 PM peak hour traffic volumes. With Alternate (1) Land use for distributions total volume. EMME/2 PM peak hour traffic volumes With Alternate (2) Land use for distributions total L volume. EMME/2 PM peak hour traffic volumes With Alternate (3) No Action Land use for total volume. AM peak hour traffic volumes with estimated TGR With Alternate (1) Land use for distributions for from historic trends or use of EMNM2 model total volume. AM peak hour traffic volumes with estimated TGR With Alternate (2) Land use for distributions for from historic trends or use of EMME/2 model. total volume. AM peak hour traffic volumes with estimated TGR With Alternate (3) No Action Land use for total from historic trends or use of EMME/2 model. volume. Synchro traffic model — Saturday peak hour traffic With Alternate (1) Land use for total volume. volumes with estimated TGR from historic trends. Synchro traffic model — Saturday peak hour traffic With Alternate (2) Land use for total volume. volumes with estimated TGR from historic trends Synchro traffic model — Saturday peak hour traffic With Alternate (3) No Action Land use for total volumes with estimated TGR from historic trends volume. No WC ratios, LOS deficiencies, or TIP projects will be shown as the narrative in the report will state that in the year 2009 a reality check shall occur to verify the land use progression of development has occurred and that the traffic conditions as forecasted above in fact did occur. This will be measured against the assigned 2009 to 2014 6-year TIP and traffic model prepared in 2009. Limited comparison of traffic volumes with long range transportation plan will be conducted by the CONSULTANT for inclusion in mitigation section of EIS. TASK A-2 IMPACTS AND LEVEL'OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze local street segments used by the proposed development alternatives that access collector and arterial street network, and all intersections of collector and arterial streets that are significantly impacted by trips from the (3) Three Alternatives for the City Center as identified by the CITY as a significant impact. The CITY will identify the significant impacted areas as valuated in TASK A-1 though the trip distributions of the (3) Three alternatives and those volume capacity ratios in the horizon year of 2009. The CONSULTANT shall post -process the model traffic volumes at impacted intersections. Intersection levels of service for the signalized and un-signalized intersections will be carried out using Synchro version 5.0 for each of the (3) Three alternatives for the City Center Planned Action SEPA. 11 7 The CONSULTANT assumes that up to 25 intersections will be analyzed for the identified study area for weekday Am and PM peak hour and up to 15 intersections will be analyzed for the Saturday peak hour (estimated total: 40). The CONSULTANT shall provide within this contract a task item identified as "Optional Services TASK A-2a Additional Intersection Analysis". Whereas, a cost per intersection is identified for additional analysis upon determination of impacts by TASK A-1, and as directed by the CITY. The cost per intersection shall be used to increase the contract amount or decrease the contract amount if the number of intersections change through the completion of TASK A-1. If traffic impacts for the proposed new land use alternatives are found as a decrease or have no net effect to the 2009 horizon year, the scope of the CONSULTANT work shall be changed or decreased by the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall provide within this contract a task item identified as "Optional Services TASK A-2b Additional Traffic Count Data Collection". Whereas, a cost per intersection is identified for additional traffic counts upon determination of impacts by TASK A-1, and as directed by the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall not proceed with "Optional Services" unless authorized in writing by the CITY's Project Manager under terms of this agreement. I. Existing Traffic Conditions The CITY will provide to the CONSULTANT the following: Current EMME/2 City Traffic Model created for the 2004-2009 TIR • Current year Synchro files. • Current inventory of traffic counts and turning movement counts and that date of the collection of the data. • Current 2004-2009 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan. • Current (3) Three calendar year accident records as identified locations are made by the CONSULTANT. • Access to the current and adopted version to the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan in electronic format. • Any existing data for traffic counts prepared for Average Daily Traffic (ADT) that determine peak hour trends for weekday and weekend intervals. 12 8 The CONSULTANT shall provide within the content of the TIA: ❑ Street Network by Functional Classification. a Geometries of Network and Intersections. a Traffic Control Locations. ❑ Signal Timing and Signal Operations. ❑ Existing Right of Way. o Hourly Traffic Counts, less than 2 years old. 2001 data is approved. o Tuming Movement Counts, less than 2 years old, including peak hour factors, percentage of trucks, number of buses stopping and pedestrians. 2001 data is approved. o Accident Data, last (3) current calendar years. Accident data provided by the CITY, locations are determined by the CONSULTANT. a Identification of Safety Inadequacies as defined by any of the following conditions over the three-year period: 1. An accident rate of more than 1.0 accidents per mullion entering vehicles into an intersection. 2. An accident rate of more than 10.0 accidents per million vehicle miles of roadway segment. o Transit Service. Existing and planned facilities. ❑ Bicycle Facilities. Existing and planned facilities. o Pedestrian Facilities. Existing and planned facilities. II. The CONSULTANT shall re -verify the inclusion of the following for the future projected traffic conditions: A. Annual Growth rate shall match the existing 2020 traffic model. B. Traffic growth projections shall allow for all current 2004-2009 infrastructure improvements. C. The CONSULTANT shall add impacts of adjacent major developments pending and approved. The CITY will supply copies of applicable known Transportation Impact Analyses. Known to this contract scope are the following reports prepared and the CONSULTANT shall review for completed traffic information. 13 9 ❖ S 320`h St @ I-5 EIS for the Transit Center ❖ Christian Faith Center — TIA ❖ Design Study Report 1-5/SR18/SR161 "Triangle Study". D. Trip Distributions as detailed in TASK A-1. E. Modal Split as provided in existing City of Federal Way traffic model. F. Trip Assignment as detailed in TASK A-1 III. Forecast of Conditions with each Alternate. A. The CONSULTANT shall provide forecast of conditions for (3) Three Alternatives for 6/10 of the "planning envelope" of full build out estimated and determined as 2009. B. The CONSULTANT shall follow and apply the methods as defined in the City of Federal Way "Guidelines to Transportation Impact Analysis, page 7, dated revised 31 Dec 2000 and denoted as item B" C. The CONSULTANT shall not review access management standards, as individual development shall review at the time of submittal. Deliverable items shall include maps for presentation of this analysis and tables to include the LOS, delay, and volumes. TASK A-3 MITIGATION MEASURES Appropriate mitigation measures: Any combination of street improvements or Transportation Demand Management measures which reduce the number of trips generated by the alternatives at an impacted intersection below the impact threshold values in Table 2 or improve the level of service to E or better with a volume/capacity ratio less than 1.000 for signalized or all -way stop -controlled intersections or a volume/capacity ratio of less than 1.000 for unsignalized intersections not controlled by an all -way stop. Levels of service are defined by the current version of the Hiahway Capacity Manual and are shown in Table 3 of the City of Federal Way `Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analysis'. As determined by TASK A-1 and TASK A-2 the CONSULTANT shall recommend mitigation measures to mitigate level of service deficiencies as defined above for intersections and roadway segments to comply with the concurrency requirements per the Growth Management Act (GMA) and the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The CONSULTANT shall address the following within the recommendations for mitigation measures as determined by the traffic analysis impacts: 14 10 ' ❑ Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) identified within the City of Federal Way 20 year plan that requires acceleration and reprogramming as currently ranked by the CITY. ❑ New Facilities (all modes). ❑ Geometric Modifications as can be determined ❑ Traffic Control Modifications as can be determined. y ❑ Timing of implementation. ❑ On -Site Improvements — identification of right of way dedication by conceptual map as required and determined by the City of Federal Way current 2004-2009 } TIP and as identified in the appropriate mitigation measures. Narrative shall state within the report that right of way dedication and frontage improvements shall be required at the time of a proposed development submittal phase of an alternative within the City Center Planned Action SEPA. 3 ❑ Off -Site Improvements — as recommended by CONSULTANT, and as denoted in City of Federal Way current 2004 - 2009 TIP. The CONSULTANT shall indicate 3 a possible list of off -site mitigations for 2009-2014 based upon the limited 2014 analysis. Such recommendations will be drawn from the city's adopted long-range transportation plan and judgment by the CONSULTANT and city. ❑ Local Streets and collectors- recommendations for the use of traffic control devices to reduce impacts on residential streets as identified by the CONSULTANT and approved by the CITY. ❑ New or Revised traffic signals and turn lanes — as recommended by the CONSULTANT and described as item 3, page 9 of the City of Federal Way guidelines for Transportation Impact Analysis, dated revised 31 Dec 2000. ❑ Internal Transportation System — Facility requirements for all modes. 1. The CONSULTANT shall analyze Multimodal impacts of the (3) Three alternatives proposal, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plans will be developed as appropriate to the City Center proposal and impacts. 2. The CONSULTANT shall identify other internal facility requirements that will be requested of developments during subsequent site -specific reviews. Such requirementa may include provide recommendations for improvements to Traffic Control Requirements for signing and striping, ADA requirements, safety mitigation, and upgrades associated with impacts from mitigation measures. 3. Parking Requirements - The CONSULTANT will estimate the parking requirements of the city center proposal per the CITY current 15 11 requirements, note the peak hour traffic demands, and the synergistic effects of mixed -use development patterns. . Mitigation Programming — The CONSULTANT shall evaluate needs for infrastructure programming due to traffic impacts of the (3) Three Alternatives, The CONSULTANT shall provide within this contract a task item identified as "Optional Services TASK A-3a Mitigation Alternatives — Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Calibration". Whereas, a task is identified for review and approval by the CITY containing a full description of scope, estimate of hours, and budget to perform tasks to re -calibrate and re -cost the City TIF, estimated for completion December 2003. Mitigation recommendations are required as per this contract with an optional service to be determined at a later date. The Final Report shall contain (3) three methods of mitigation proposed by the CONSULTANT. TASK A-4 APPENDIX The CONSULTANT shall provide the following within the report: a. All Maps not contained within the body of the report. b. Count data used for the analysis. C. LOS calculations. d. Warrant worksheets. e. Signal progression analyses. TASK A-5 REVIEW COMMENTS The CONSULTANT shall provide the City the number of hours and estimate under this task item to address review comments by the CITY, public comment, WSDOT, METRO, and all AGENCY review. The CONSULTANT shall allow a (4) Four week time turn around for review and comment by the CITY. DELIVERABLES The CONSULTANT shall provide the CITY the following: (3) Three bound copies of TASK A-1 (3) Three bound copies of Draft TIA. 16 12 (3) Final bound copies of Final TIA for EIS, All EIectronic files for all traffic models and traffic analysis for ownership by the CITY. All Electronic files used in the preparation of the draft and final document of the TIA. &%TRAFFIOTransportation Scope for City Center Project 7-17-03.doc 17 13 Blank `Rl Appendix B. Summary of Model Development Attached are the land use assumptions, zone structure map and model validation results of the traffic model. The land use data was developed by Jones & Stokes as part of the Federal Way City Center Planned Action EIS. The analysis focused on expected growth levels from 2004 to 2009 and 2009 to 2014. Documents: 1. City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action EIS TAZ Land Use Allocations and Model Assumptions — revised June 2006 2. Map of Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) structure for FWCC 3. 2004 Federal Way City Center Model Validation - March 18, 2005 19 Blank 20 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action EIS TAZ Land Use Allocations and Model Assumptions } } 1. Introduction/Background The City of Federal Way prepared a Planned Action EIS for a portion of City Center. l The EIS considered two action alternatives, each of which assumes total development as shown in Table 1, and one no action alternative, which assumes future growth as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Although the two action alternatives assume the same amount of total growth, the growth is distributed throughout the study area differently under each alternative. Table 1. Proposed Development Uses Action Alternatives No Action Retail 750,000 sf 220,270 sf Office 350,000 sf 104,440 sf Lodging 600 rooms 0 Residential 750 units 270 units Civic 100,000 sf 1 0 Structured Parking 750 stalls I0 Source: City of Federal Way, 2003 For both the action and no action alternatives, future development has been allocated (1) geographically into 3 sub -areas (or blocks) within the study area and (2) by time periods (2004-2009 and 2010-2014). In order to allow an analysis of potential transportation impacts of the proposal, future anticipated development must be further allocated into Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ). Block 1 is comprised of 7 TAZs, Block 2 is comprised of 8 TAZs and Block 3 is comprised of 1 TAZ. The blocks and corresponding TAZs are described below. ■ Block 1 (TAZs: 1049,1050,1051,1055,1056,1057,1058)— Bounded on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the north by South 3121h Street, on the south by South 316th Street, and on the east by 23rd Avenue South. • Block 2 (TAZs: 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1067)— Bounded on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the north by South 316th Street, on the south by South 320th Street, and on the east by 23rd Avenue South. ■ Block 3 (TAZ: 1072)— Bounded on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the north by South 316th Street, on the south by South 324th Street, and on the east by 23rd Avenue South. The approach for the allocations of future land use to TAZs is described below. Federal Way Planned Action EIS TAZAllocation Methodology 21 Revised June 2006 2. No Action Alternative The City of Federal Way has allocations of future land use to the TAZ level for the entire study area. These allocations are based on the existing Comprehensive Plan land use forecasts and were assumed for the No Action Alternative. 3. Action Alternatives Allocation of future development to the TAZ level for the action alternatives is based on the allocation ratios established in the No Action Alternative. For example, Block 1 contains seven TA -Zs. Under the No Action Alternative, multi -family development within this block is distributed among these TAZs at ratios ranging from zero to 35 percent. These ratios were applied to the proposed multi -family development in Block 1 for each of the action alternatives. The process of identifying the ratio of TAZ to total block development was followed for each of the land use categories and applied to the action alternatives. The City's TAZ land use allocations are provided for multi -family, office, retail and other uses. The action alternatives for this Planned EIS propose multi -family, office, retail, lodging (hotel), civic, and parking uses. To allocate parking in the City Center, the ratio for "retail" uses was assumed. For the purposes of allocation of lodging and civic uses for the action alternatives, the ratio for "other" uses was assumed. 4. 2009 and 2014 Model Network Assumptions The 2009 and 2014 baseline forecasts assume a variety of roadway and intersection improvements that are expected to be completed between 2004 and 2009 and between 2009 and 2014. City staff identified projects for inclusion in the 2009 and 2014 EMME/2 forecasting model used in the analysis. Projects were determined after review of the City of Federal Way's2005-2010 Transportation Improvement Program, the City's Capital Improvement Program, scheduled State Interchange improvements, expected improvements to the Interstate 5 corridor, and other known projects identified by City staff. Discussions with the City staff also identified model network assumptions and methodologies to be used to reflect High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes, turn restrictions and U-turn locations in the forecasting model. These network assumptions were held constant in the analysis the three alternative land use scenarios. Attachments: Table 2 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Allocations by TAZ Table 3 Alternatives 1, 2 and 3 Land Use Allocations by TAZ — 2004-2009 Table 4 Alternatives 1, 2 and 3Land Use Allocations by TAZ — 2010-2014 Federal Way Planned Action EIS TAZAllocation Methodology 22 Revised June 2006 Table 2. Land Use Allocations by TAZ TAZ MF I Office I Retai! Other I Total I I TAZ I % MF /o ofFc /o retai %Other BLOCK 1 1049 11 1,913 8,136 338 10,386 1049 11.5% 2.8% 8.3% 2.8% 1050 34 47,831 54,262 8,441 110,534 1050 35.4% 69.1% 55.2% 69.1% 1051 0 0 0 0 0 1051 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1055 32 7,365 15,153 1,3001 23,818 1055 33.3% 10.6% 15.4% 10.6% 1056 19 6,419 10,677 1,133 18,229 1056 19.8% 9.3% 10.9% 9.3% 1057 0 Z 855 5,021 504 8,380 1057 0.0% 4.10 5.1 % 4.1 1058 0 Z855 5,021 504 8,380 1058 0.0% 4.1 % 5.1 % 4.1 % SUM 96 69,238 98,270 12,218 179,726 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% BLOCK 2 1060 21 10,940 14,605 1,931 27,476 1060 1 15.7% 19.2% 12.3% 19.2% 1061 12 18,612 21,114 3,284 43,010 1061 9.0% 32.6% 17.7% 32.6% 1062 48 8,166 34,740 1,441 44,347 1062 35.8% 14.3% 29.2% 14.3% 1063 23 4,160 17,696 734 22,590 1063 17.2% 7.3% 14.9% 7.3% 1064 14 1,226 5,215 216 6,657 1064 10.4% 2.1 % 4.4% 2.1 % 1065 0 3,893 6,847 687 11,427 1065 0.0% 6.8% 5.7% 6.8% 1066 9 1,689 7,184 298 9,171 1066 6.7% 3.0% 6.0% 3.0% 1067 7 8,409 11,732 1,484 21,625 1067 5.2% 14.7% 9.8% 14.7% SUM 134 57,094 119,134 10,0751 186,303 100.0%1 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% BLOCK 3 1072 1361 22,8631 97,2651 4,0341 124,163 1072 1 100% 1 100% 100% 100% TABLE 3. Land Use Allocations by Block and Time Period- 2004-2009 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 ;' s� j? Ib �iye:3 . ' "'`-' •!. TAZ MF units Office(st) Retails Lodging rooms Civics Parking stalls mF un�Joffice sf Retails Lodging roams Civics Parking stalls _ =3 le --� M-F_'w -itsli -a }- '"pffi� :: .. :.: O - - Block t - 7049 D 1125 5602 0 0 0 0 2268 12699 D 0 0 .s: -- - ..Er3,:. ;2 :.�=.' 1050 0 25875 37260 80 0 0 0 _ 55971 84456 132 0 175 x - — '9 1051 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 D 7 1055 0 4125 10395 0 0 0 0 8586 23562 0 0 '0 ~'':r.7; .= �7 —�-';? i O.; _; '53'72 3 E4 1056 50 3375 7357 0 0 0 145 7533 16677 0 0 0'826;; 7057 0. 1500 3442 0' 0 0 0 3321 7803 0 0 0 'p', r f` :8,56r�t7 =F f 1056 25 1500 3442 0 0 0 a0 -165 3321 7803 _ 0 0 0 ` sum 75 37500 67498 80 0 0 . 81000 153000 132 0 175 _ 23� 51. iu -05 MM ---- -_- -- - --- _ -- Block 2 1060 45 _ 21600 24908 36 0 0 33 15552 18819 25 0 0 ----- - '7: } r 6 576 �... �JCi - 936;;:• .•. .. i• 1b.+ I 4:3� 1061 45. 36675 35843 36 0 0 33 1 26406 27081 44, 0 D 3 M, - ..':1.,.=: 1062 0 16088 59130 0 0 50 0 �0 11583 44676 18 0 0 �6.. ';", 1063 0 8213 30171 0 0 0 5913 22797 10 0 D 1064 45 2362 8910 36 0 0 33 1701 6732 3 0 0- 1065 0 7650 11543 0 0 50 0 5506 8721 9 • 0 0 - :`_ • l`�;' '0 W 1066 45 3375 12150 3$ 0 0 33 2430 9180 4 0 0 -2; a ~ o,':_ -- ;;251,4,: Y- 1067 45 16537 19845 36 0 50 33 11907 14994 19 0 0 - R. :i; " 5- - slim 225 112500 202500 180 0 150 165 810DO 153000 132 0 0 31 `"'' __•_ `� _�7.._...� __ _.:•�„-kFjy'E- - Y.j�-'• �� .mom 4�11 Block 3 1 1072 150 60,000 180,000 120 0 300 120 48,000 144,000 96 0 240 31 74 6.859 1 34,041 1 1,210 Final Alts 1 2 and 3 7.02 04.xls N Cn Table 4. Land Use Allocations by Block and Time Period- 2010-2014 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 TAZ MF (units) Office (s Retail Longing. rooms Civics Parking (stalls), MF units Offices Retails Lodging , roorns Civic (sf) Parking stalls) MF-[ranits we:{s Retail "' Block l �,t 1049 0 700 3735 0 0 0 0 . 1512 8466 0 - 1400 0 _� _ ;; _ W •.:','66�:' f T - - + 1050 0 17275 1 24840 40 0 0 0 37314 56304 : 88 34600 Q 1051 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..Of ."N Y'. 0r�i 1055 0 2650 6930 0 0 0 0 5724 15708 0: 5500 0 -`-'10' *n f'2.mo L 1056 25 2325 4905 0 0 0 55 5022 11118 0 4500 D 5. 2•2:.- r �;'"2;455 1057 01025 2295 0 0 0 0 2214 5202 0 2000 0 U:! 9_ a 1. 1058 '25 1025 2295 0 0 0 55 2214 5202 0 I 2000 0 sum 50 25000 45000 40 0 0 110 54000 102000 - tB 50,000 0 28. i 23,�9&2`' .� :QD • - =i.+"'S.' E '2 I4`.V: •4 - .. :_1,�1f`i.� - :7%:.... Q - -. y A4�t `::_ - - �r�_j�ii" ` i .�2 - yyLLS-'-.«=' _ LY. ' : ?i�l� 0 --:�' '.._ .un: - �y.y-_ T��iA✓ yy��,, Y. >a-il1!f1.: Block r"> .Rr:'Sc t.lrry 1060 go.. 14400 16605 24. 9500 0 :.22 10368 12546 0 9500 0 1061 30 24450 23895 24 16500 0 22 17604 18054 88 16500 0 '�' Sfi �.u790'z c1 1062 0 10725 39420 0 7000 50 0 7722 29784 0 7000 100 IMOW'c''' '$• 1063 0 5475 20115 0 3650 0 0 3942 15198 0 3650 0 1064 3fl 1575 5940 124 1050 0 . 22 1134 4488 4 1050 0 '=' ; �M :119 1065 0 5100 7695 0. 3400 50 0 3672 5814 0 3400 10 i 1066 90, 2250 8100 24. 1500 (Y 22 1520 6120 0 1600 75 t3__-=:x C"`'' s AM_ I :' . CM, 1067 30 11025 13230 24 7350 0 22 7938 9996 6 7350 0 �•''': ' SUM 1.50 75000 135000 120 49950 100. 11.0 54000 1 102000 8$ 49950 775 -:•. , '' +' - ... .. _ - .. xx` .,:.:;H :U':._ ' .:i+:::F .,. —•`.v. .r is ,'��. A",_ Block 3 1072 100 40,000 120,000 80 50,000 200 80 32000 96000 64 0 160 34 8,002 1 22,371 1,412 Final Ails 1 2 and 3 7.02.04.xis 1027 1028 1024 1033 • ;a � 1039 1086 �s.ryy 1088 1092 ) rf, 1101 1089 1026 1025 392 1035 1037 7 1041 042 1043 1044 ' 1034 `i 1045 1048 47 1048 9 055 1 60 1057 1053 s 1052n 106 1059 1054 1040 r u 1061 1062 106 7069 1090 1059 1065 1066 1067 8 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 10 1 1075 1077 1105 1103 11 ' 1106 a 1109 ' 1107 1108 1102 1111 1 0 1199 111 1113 1114 1197 1194 1196 1 2004 Federal Way City Center Model Validation Memorandum: For the City Center project, 2004 PM peak one hour model was created based on City's -� 2000 model. The city's original 2000 model was validated to 2000 counts. Since then the model has been expanded from 220 zone system to 250 zone system (within the City only) to study the potential annexation areas. 3 The 2004 model incorporates lane and capacity changes to reflect existing conditions. _ Figurel shows the location of all the screenlines used in the validation. Table 1 presents the validation results at screenline level. All of the ten screenlines are within +/- 10% of counts. The model numbers vary from -9% to +8% compared to the counts. Over all, the screenlines fall within -3% of the counts. A regression analysis showed that these screenlines have an R-Square value of 0.985 for the screenlines and a value of 0.783 for -� all the links (124) considered in the validation. For 2000 model validation, R-Square value for all the links was 0.773. Table 2 shows results from 2000 validation. The screenlines were within -24% to +14% with an overall number of -8% of the 2000 counts. During 2004 model validation process two screenlines EW-6 and NS-6 are dropped. EW-6 was located near the south end of the City limit just east of I-5. EW-6 contains 1 only Milton Road. The count for 2000 was NB 80 and SB 148 where as 2003 count } shows only NB 35 and SB 52. The 2004 model volumes are 89 and 140 for NB and SB respectively, which matches closely to 2000 counts but not 2003 counts. Screenline NS6 is located near West valley highway running parallel to it. NS6 screenline considered only 5.277 St and S. Peasley for 2000 validation for lack of available counts on other streets like 5.296th, Mountain View Dr, 5.331 and SR-18. Without the count for all the five links, the screenline doesn't give a true picture. For lack of counts, this screenline is dropped. } Overall, 2004 model is an improvement to 2000 model considering land use, network and 7 validation results. Small areas may need fine tuning for any specific application. 27 Link values) an base network.- aula volumes :alas %wi a)n?.im:am: S—w 'OX* awi U. 10% 2004•00..1225 Table 12004 'Validation FEDERAL WAY CITY CENTER PROJECT 2004 Model Validation Screen Line 2000 Counts * 2003 Counts Model Volume Difference (Model volume - 2003 Counts % Difference 11 EW-1 736.5 7406 8004 598 8% 12 Ew-2 -6,949. 6821 6462 -359 -5% 13 Ew-3 5771- 6050 5700 -350 -6% 14 Ew-4 13927 14194 12853 -1342 -9% 15 Ew-5 5504 5262 5517 255 5% 21 Ns-1 6016 5801 5977 176 3% 22 Ns-2 9656 8951 8648 -303 -3% 23 NS-3 14.1322 14477 13845 -632 -4% 24 Ns-4 3532: 4369 4338 -31 -1 % 25 N3-5 26,61 3922 3685 -237 -6% All Screen Line 76543 77254 75030 -2223 -2.88% * - To Provide comparison to 2003 Counts Regression for Screenlines Regression Statistics Adjusted R Square 0985857,Q91. Standard Error 448.7665775 Observations 10 Regression for all links in the screenlines Regression Statistics Adjusted R Square ,0:,78321:660:, Standard Error Observations 216.2223295 124 29 Table 2 2000 Baseline Calibration Table 10. 2000 Baseline Calibration Results Screenline 'No. COUNTS VOLUMES IDIFF IIDIFF% 11 EW-1 6035 6345 310 5% 12 EW-2 6949 724 295; 4% 13 EW-3 5771 54001 -371� -6% 14 EW-4 13927 11925.. -2002� -14°° 15 EW-5 5504 5002 .502j 16 EW-6 228 223 .5 .2% 21 NS-1 6016 4572, -144� -24% 22 NS-2 9656 8308 -1348 -140 23 NS-3 14822 12986 -183 -12% 24 NS-4 3932 3868 .64, -2% 25 NS-5 2601 2869 268 10°/ 26 INS-6 366 4189 525 14°/ All SCREEN LINES 7910 72931 -617 .8% IR Square 0.7726 Average Link Error = 26% IRoot Mean Square (RMS) = 229.89 IRMS Coefficient of Variance = 35% 30 Appendix C. Study Intersections The following tables illustrate the two-tier analysis used for selecting study intersections for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. The first tier includes existing and future transportation facilities affected by 10 or more trips in both directions during the evening PM peak hour and 100 or more trips during other the AM and Saturday peak hours. The second tier reviewed the results from the level of service and the volume -to -capacity ratio analyses to identify the existing and future locations likely to exceed the City's concurrency requirements (LOS E or a volume to capacity ratio greater than 1.0). Note that the V/C listed in the table was the maximum V/C for any movement. The selected intersections used an average v/c ratio of the critical movements of the intersection consistent with the City of Federal Way's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses (June 2004). Additional intersections were added by the consultant as a result of improvements to the traffic model and at the direction of the City staff. Documents: 1. Federal Way City Center Project PM Max VIC Ratio (Table of Tier 1 and 2 intersections) — undated. 2. Federal Way City Center Project AM Max VIC Ratio (Table of Tier 1 and 2 intersections) — undated. 3. Federal Way City Center Project Saturday Max VIC Ratio (Table of Tier 1 and 2 intersections) — undated. 31 Blank 32 t_o:.'S E 7-0G4 Federal Wav City Center Proiect PM Max VIC Ratio INTID Intersection Max VIC 2004 2009 Alt 1 2009 Alt 2 2009 Alt 3 No Action 359 S Star Lake Rd & Milita Rd S 0.69 La 0,79 0.79 0.79 458 S Star Lake Rd & M to Rd 5 S 0.9 1.09 r 1.12 1.1 1050 S 288 81 & Pacific S ✓ 1.33 0.78 01- 0.86 0.87 1056! S 288 81 & hAlltary Rd S ✓ 0.95 1,07 1.07 10611 S 288 St & 34 Av 5 ✓ 0.44 C1,53 0'r 0.53 0.53 1850 I S Dash Point Rd & Redondo Wy S OW 0,61 oY 0.61 0.61 JOI$IT S Dash Point Rd S ,Paelflla Hwy S V 0.84 0.69 V 0.8 0.68 2051 $304 St & Pa�Oc H S 0.971 0.88 ;, ' 0.87 0.88 2057 S 304 St & 28 Av S ✓ 1.111 0.78 >! 0.77 0.75 2058 S 304 St & Kritmy Rd S 0.88 0.91 y;% 0.9 0.86 2250 S 308 St & Pacific H S ✓ 0.95 0.82 c,; 0.81 0.82 2530 SW 312 St & SW 089h Paint Rd ✓ 0.96 0.9 n!' 0.9 0,92 2540 $W 312 SL & 1 Av S 887 0.93 0.93 0.94 2545 S 312 St & 8 Ave 5 E / 0.78 0.84 t 0.84 0.83 2546 S 312 St & 8 Av 5 0.78 0.8411.), 0.84 0.83 2549 S 312 St & 14 Av S 0.57 0,57 . ;' 0.58 0.54 2560 S 312 S1 & Pacific S V 0.95 1.45 1.07 2552 S 312 St & 20 Av S J 0,81 _91 rY 0.89 0.87 2554 S 312 St & 23 Av S 0.815 !1 t n 0.74 0,69 2557 S 312 St 8 2B Av S 0.65 1 r ' 1 , 0 0.87 0.75 2612 SW Dash Point Rd & 47 Av SW 0.54 0.6 r: l! 0.6 0.62 2628 SW Dash Point Rd & 21 st Av SW 01.73 0.67".. 0.67 0.67 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Ffm S 0.87 0.85 n ' 0.85 0.85 2752 S 316 St & 20 Av S 0.79 0.85 r) 0.81 0.68 2754 S 316 St & 23 Av S 0.7 0.54 , { 0.57 0.53 2855 8 317 St & 23 Av S ✓ 0.91 1.51 n ',r 1.51 1.51 3012 SW 320 Si & Ho Rd SW ✓ 0.89 1.05 1.03 1.0E 3028 SW 320 St & 21st Av SW 0.90 1 e 0.99 1 3040 S W 320 St & 1 Av S 1.09 0,94 n V 0.94 0.94 3046 S 320 St & 8 Av S ✓ CI.9 0.73 of 0.73 0.72 3046 S 320 St & 11 P1 S ✓ 1,06 0.89 c <'- 0.89 0.9 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hn S v 0.08 0.78 ,% 0.78 0.74 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 0.9 1,53 1,22 0.85 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av 5 0.91 .1 v i f ! 1. O 0.93 1.02 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 S8 •320 Romp 0,98 a 1.09 0.85 3058 S 320 St & 320 - �-5 NB Romp 0.88 0.81 a r' 0.8 0.85 3061 S 320 S1 & We arteFreuser Wy S ✓ 0.691 1,41 1.41 1.27 3064 S 320 St & Military Rd S 1 v 1G ,, 1106 1.09 3165 S 321 St & S Peasley 2yn Rd 0.87 0.91 0.91 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hn S 0.W 0.92 r I 0.92 0.94 3640 SW 330th St & i Av S 0,97 O t' 0.97 0.98 3858 S 336 St & We arhaeuser W S ✓ 0.75 0.86 0 f 0.86 0.77 4028 SW 336th St & 21st Av SW 0.98 t - .. 1.45 1.44 4043 S 336 St & IS Oa8 0.93 0.92 0.95 405018 336 St & PaclOc-H S 1.271 0.95 o F' 0.91 0,93 A1321 10 Av SW & SW Campos D( 0.991 1.05 of 1.05 1,07 4218 SW 340th 51 & Ha Rd SW 0.91 0.95 0'- 0.94 0.96 4250 IGAY$&Padl%HWyS 1 0.671 0.62 O Y- 0.61 0.58 4460 SR18 WB Ramps & Weyerhaeuser Wy S V 01.81 a;' 0.8 0.73 4560 SR18 EB Ramps & We •erhaeuser W S 0.871 44 0.95 0.93 4840 SW Ca us Or & 1 Av S i'm vle 1.18 1.06 464-8 S 3481h St & Pad9c H ,S f 0.95 We- ! 1.22 1,19 48M S 348th St & 16 Av S ✓ 1.02 .93 OA' 0.92 0.92 4852 '.SRI8 & 1-5 S8 off Ramps to SR-18 WB k7 0.95 1.021 1,02 1.02 5228 5W 356 St & 21,91 Av -5W 0.85 vie ` i.o 1.21 1.22 5240 SW 356 St & 1 Av S V 0.81 ou 0.85 0.88 524fi S 358 St & Pacific H S ✓' 0.98 v f_ L I , 0 1.06 1 A4 5251 5 358 $t & Enchanted P S 0.91 v LI I-- , , n 1.55 1.16 33 Federal Way City Center Project AM Max V/C Ratio Syn INTID Location Max WC 2004 2009 Alt 1 2009 Alt 2 2009 All 3 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 0.87 ` 0.91 0.92 2051 S 304 St & Pacific H S 0.86 0.78 0.78 0.75 2250 S 308 St & Pacific Hwy S 0.88 0.78 t; 0.78 0.78 2550 S 312 St & Pacific. Hwy S 0.921 v 0.89 r' 0.89 0.88 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 0.491 0.54 0.53 0.53 3028 SW 320 Si & 21 st Av SW 1.26 2.27 2.27 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 1.37 2,21 2.2 3046 S 320 St & 8 Av S 0.74 0.81 a: 0.81 0.78 3048 S 320 St & 11 PIS 0.79 0.82 ni' 0.82 0.79 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hn S 0.72 0.69 '" 0.68 0.64 3052 S -320 St & 20 Av S 0.5 0.52 0.54 0.49 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 0.82 0.79 0.8 0,78 3057 S-320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0,85 " - , 0.8 0.79 3068 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 0.93 0.8 9:z 0.8 0.79 3061 S 320 St & Weyerhaeuser Wy S 0.45 0.94 r•; 0.94 0.94 3064 S 320 St & Militaa Rd S 0.9 0.99 0.99 0.98 3165 S 321 St & S Peasley Cyn Rd 0.781 0.77 0.79 0.78 3350 S 324 St & Pacific HIAy S 0.51 0.61 r,F 0.61 0.61 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 0.98 IMI W- `I 1.481 1.48 4250 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 0.72 0, 59 -r 0.59 0.57 34 Federal Way City Center Proiect SAT Max VIC Ratio INTID Intersection Max VIC 2004 2009 Alt 1 2009 Alt 2 2009 Alt 3 1050 S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S f ,04 n 0.79 c;' 0.79 0.76 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hmy S 0.68 0.74 o r 0.74 0.75 2051 S 304 St & Pacific Hn S 0.93 0.78 0.78 0.83 2250 S 308 St & Pacific Hwy S 0.93 0.79 0 0.79 0.79 2540 SW 312 St & 1 Av S 0.75 0.87 0.87 0.84 2545 S 312 St & 8 Ave S E 0.41 0.76 0.75 0.68 2546 S 312 St & 8 Av S W 0.49 0.76 0.75 0.68 2549 S 312 St & 14 Av S 0.58 0.67 0' 0.66 0.61 2550 8 342 Si & Pacif+a Hwy S 1.5 1.23 2760 8 319 81 & ,Pacif Hwy S - 2:S 1.27 1.16 3028 SW 320 St & 21 si Av SW 1.65 1.041 1.03 1.03 3040 SW $20 St & i Av 8p ,2.rN 1.38 1.2 3046 S 320 St & 8 Av S 0,97 0.961 ow 0.96 6.96 3048 S 32O St & 11 PIS 0.96 0.85 ��` 0.85 0.87 3050 S 320 St & Paciflc 8 1.81 2.25 1',93 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av 8 3.04 1.88 1.54 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 1.5 1.49 1.21 3057 8 M St & 1-5 88 - 3201 Ram 1.16 0.8 0.79 3088 $320 St & 320 -1-5 N9 loam 0.96 1.28 1.23 3061 S 320 St & Weyerhaeuser Wy S 0.52 0.61 c r 0.61 0.61 3064 S 320 St & Mililn Rd S 1,391 0.96 - 0.94 0.88 3165 S 321 St & 8 Peasley gyn Rd 1.13 y 0.9 » 0.9 0.88 3350 S 324 St & Peaft S 1.08 1.11 1.11 4028 SW 336th St & 21 st Av SW 1 1.33 1.33 1.29 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hn S 0.72 0.78 �i: 0.78 0.68 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 0,7 0.79 ail 0.79 0.75 4250 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 1.16 0.96 il, 0.96 0.94 4848 S 348th St & Pacific Hn S 1.42 1.05 1.05 0.92 4850 S 348th St & 16 Av S 1-44 1.17 r- 1.17 1.17 52461 S 356 St & Pacific H" S 1.07 0.78 r f' 0.77 0.78 35 Blank W Appendix D. Traffic Count Data Attached are tables that show the source of each count used for this study. A compact disk has been provided to the City with the full set of traffic counts. Documents: 1. Traffic Counts by Year for AM, PM and Saturday peak periods. 37 Blank Traffic Counts For AM, PM and Saturday Peak Periods Figure ID Synchro Intersection AM PM SAT INTID 1 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 2004 2004 2004 2 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 2004 2004 2004 3 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 2004 2004 2004 4 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 2004 2004 2004 5 1050 S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S 2001 6 1056 S 288 St & Military Rd S 2003 7 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 2003 8 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 2001 2001 9 2557 S 312 St & 28 Av S 2003 10 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 2001 11 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 2003 12 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2003 2003 2001 13 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 2002 2001 14 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 2001 15 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 2002 2001 16 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 2002 2002 2001 17 3058 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 2001 18 3064 S 320 St & Military Rd S 2002 19 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 2003* 2001 20 4028 SW 336th St & 21 st Av SW 2003 21 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 2002 2001 22 4218 SW 340th St & Hot Rd SW 2003 2003 2001 23 4840 SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S 2003 24 4848 S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S 2002 25 5228 SW 356 St & 21 st Av SW 2003 26 5246 S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S 2002 27 5251 S 356 St & Enchanted Pkw S 2002 * Actual count was not available, City's Synchro file was used. Jones and Stokes. W Blank w Appendix E. 2004 intersection Analysis Results Attached are the 2004 intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours. Analysis of the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours used the Synchro 6.0 (Build 612) analysis software to report the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) intersection operations. Documents: 1. 2004 PM Peak Hour HCM results 2. 2004 AM Peak Hour HCM results 3. 2004 Saturday Peak Hour HCM results 41 2004 PM Peak 52: S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL W...BT WB.R ;NBL :,ts!RT NL3R SB_L SOT $BR Lane Configurations +T* *Tt+ r I tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 Q.95 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1747 3244 1511 3157 1728 3442 1470 1738 3346 1503 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 0,95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 3244 1511 3157 1728 3442 1470 1738 3346 1503 Volume (vph) 93 358 109 604 406 55 215 797 414 362 1611 18 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.89 0,89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 102 393 120 702 472 64 250 927 481 407 1810 20 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 4 0 0 0 228 0 0 3 Lane Group Flow (vph) 102 492 0 397 837 0 250 927 253 407 1810 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 6 6 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 40.0 40.0 32.0 57.0 57.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 30.0 30.0 15.0 40.0 40.0 32.0 57.0 57.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.29 0.29 0.23 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 225 417 324 677 185 983 420 397 1362 612 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.15 0.26 c0.27 c0.14 0.27 0.23 c0.54 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.45 1.18 1.23 1.24 1.35 0.94 0.60 1.03 1.33 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 56A 61.0 55.0 55.0 62.5 48.9 43.1 54.0 41.5 24.9 Progression Factor 0.99 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 102.5 125.7 118.8 189.4 17.9 6.3 51.8 153.2 0.1 Delay (s) 56.4 163.9 180.7 173.8 251.9 66.7 49.4 105.8 194.7 25.0 Level of Service E F F F F E D F F C Approach Delay (s) 146.1 176.1 89.6 177.0 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 148.3 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.29 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 42 2004 PM Peak 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR. . NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 ++ 1 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % -3% 6% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0,95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3160 1814 3479 1614 1642 1501 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3160 1814 3479 1614 1642 1501 Volume (vph) 0 798 248 241 479 0 0 0 0 631 21 660 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 917 285 284 564 0 0 0 0 760 25 795 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1181 0 284 564 0 0 0 0 380 405 640 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Split Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 6 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 48.0 21.0 74.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 Effective Green, g (s) 48.0 21.0 74.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.15 0.53 0.40 0.40 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 - 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1083 272 1839 646 657 600 v/s Ratio Prot c0.37 c0.16 0.16 0.24 0.25 v/s Ratio Perm c0.43 v/c Ratio 1.09 1.04 0.31 0.59 0.62 1.07 Uniform Delay, dl 46.0 59.5 18.6 33.0 33.4 42.0 Progression Factor 0.96 1.05 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 55.0 50.4 0.2 0.9 1.2 55.6 Delay (s) 99.2 113.0 20.2 33.8 34.7 97.6 Level of Service F F C C C F Approach Delay (s) 99.2 51.2 0.0 66.1 Approach LOS F D A E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 73.6 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.07 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10N2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 2 43 2004 PM Peak 59: S 272 St & 272 - 1-5 NB Ramp Federal Wav Citv Center 11/912005 .,# --► `t q< t •1 T /0. \4' Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ++ ft r 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1% -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1457 1881 1601 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1710 3272 3428 1457 1881 1601 Volume (vph) 412 1270 0 0 569 462 218 48 208 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 429 1323 0 0 711 578 341 75 325 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 159 0 0 53 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 429 1323 0 0 711 419 0 416 272 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr)_ 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 45.0 19.0 19.0 15.0 15.0 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 45.0 19.0 19.0 15.0 15.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.64 0.27 0.27 0.21 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 513 2103 930 395 �- 403 343 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.40 0.21 c0.22 v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.63 0.76 1.06 1.03 0.79 Uniform Delay, dl 22.9 7.5 23.4 25.5 27.5 26.0 Progression Factor 0.75 0.27 0,86 1.44 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.1 0.8 0.6 33.4 53.4 11.2 Delay (s) 23.2 2.8 20.7 70.2 80.9 37.2 Level of Service C A C E F D Approach Delay (s) 7.8 42.9 61.7 0.0 Approach LOS A D E A Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 30.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 3 2004 PM Peak 60: S 272 St & Military Rd S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR $BL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vj +T> ti� I ? r I T+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 3071 1770 3336 1759 1804 1464 1775 1768 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1748 3071 1770 3336 1759 1804 1464 1775 1768 Volume (vph) 178 650 450 267 956 _ 68 185 208 93 74 493 102 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.81 0.81 0.81 0,83 0.83 0.83 0.87 0.87 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph) 193 707 489 330 1180 84 223 251 112 85 567 117 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 89 0 0 4 0 0 0 67 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 193 1107 0 330 1261 0 223 251 45 85 679 0 Confl. Peds. (#Jhr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 3 0 0 4 2 4 2 3 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 33.0 21.0 42.0 15.0 56.8 56.8 9.2 51.0 Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 33.0 21.0 42.0 15.0 56.8 56.8 9.2 51.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.24 0.15 0.30 0.11 0.41 0.41 0.07 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 150 724 266 1001 188 732 594 117 644 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.36 0.19 c0.38 c0.13 0.14 0.05 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 1.29 1.63 1.24 1.26 1.19 0.34 0.08 0.73 1.05 Uniform Delay, d1 64.0 53.5 59.5 49.0 62.5 28.7 25.5 64.2 44.5 Progression Factor 0,92 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 160.9 243.0 136.0 124.8 124.7 0.1 0.0 17.2 50.6 Delay (s) 219.9 290.6 195.5 173.9 187.2 28.8 25.5 81.4 95.1 Level of Service F F F F F C C F F Approach Delay (s) 280.8 178.4 88.5 93.6 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 184.0 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.26 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCTINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 4 45 2004 PM Peak 1050: S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EIBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *, 4 r Vi tt if tt, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 15 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prof) 1811 1715 1711 1594 1805 3596 1559 1769 3479 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1811 1715 1711 1594 1805 3596 1559 1769 3479 Volume (vph) 34 25 25 364 20 182 39 922 263 268 1878 42 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 44 32 32 444 24 222 40 951 271 271 1897 42 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 185 0 0 89 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 97 0 229 239 37 40 951 182 271 1938 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 6 6 0 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 Turn Type Split Split Perm Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.9 21.6 21.6 21.6 6.8 59.1 59.1 24.4 76.7 Effective Green, g (s) 9.9 23.6 23.6 23.6 8.3 60.6 60.6 25.9 78.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.18 0.56 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 128 289 288 269 107 1557 675 327 1943 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.13 c0.14 0.02 c0.26 0.15 c0.56 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.79 0.83 0.14 0.37 0.61 0.27 0.83 1.00 Uniform Delay, d1 63.9 55.8 56.3 49.6 63.4 30.6 25.5 54.9 30.8 Progression Factor 1.00 0.96 0.96 1.26 1.02 0.97 1.25 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 20.0 12.9 16.8 0.1 0.7 1.6 0.9 15.1 19.8 Delay (s) 83.8 66.6 71.0 62.7 65.1 31.2 32.8 70.0 50.6 Level of Service F E E E E C C E D Approach Delay (s) 83.8 66.9 32.6 53.0 Approach LOS F E C D intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 50.0 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group CAPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 5 .N 2004 PM Peak 1056: S 288 St & Military Rd S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 -.4 -► --* 4,- '- 4-- 4\ T t* \0. 1 41 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T* +t + r + r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util, Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1817 3265 1716 3160 1760 1777 1510 1799 1846 1568 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1817 3265 1716 3160 1760 1777 1510 1799 1846 1568 Volume (vph) 103 215 124 242 330 116 133 305 134 285 575 177 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 110 229 132 269 367 129 140 321 141 306 618 190 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 53 0 0 23 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 110 308 0 269 473 0 140 321 81 306 618 190 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.2 31.3 24.6 43.7 14.3 36.6 36.6 26.5 48.8 48.8 Effective Green, g (s) 12.2 31.3 24.6 43.7 14.8 37.1 37.1 27.0 49.3 49.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.22 0.18 0.31 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.19 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 730 302 986 186 471 400 347 650 552 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.09 c0.16 c0.15 0.08 c0.18 0.17 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.42 0.89 0.48 0.75 0.68 0,20 0.88 0.95 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 62.1 46.6 56.4 39.0 60.8 46.2 40.0 54.9 44.2 33.4 Progression Factor 1.14 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.77 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.2 1.8 25.6 1.7 13.3 3.0 0.1 21.6 23.6 0.1 Delay (s) 81.2 40.2 82.0 40.6 63.7 38.4 24.7 76.5 67.7 33.6 Level of Service F D F D E D C E E C Approach Delay (s) 49.8 55.2 41.1 64.3 Approach LOS D E D E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 54.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 6 47 2004 PM Peak 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 � � � 'r � k 4\ t �► 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +I +T. ) ++T+ ►g W r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1,00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 3277 1759 3271 1759 4860 1773 4938 1505 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 1764 3277 1759 3271 1759 4860 1773 4938 1505 Volume (vph) 271 378 119 154 416 143 301 815 88 210 1201 314 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 291 406 128 169 457 157 317 858 93 228 1305 341 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 24 0 0 9 0 0 0 125 Lane Group Flow (vph) 291 513 0 169 590 0 317 942 0 228 1305 216 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1%n 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.8 34.9 16.5 26.6 27.3 41.6 27.5 41.8 41.8 Effective Green, g (s) 24.8 34.9 16.5 26.6 26.8 41.6 27.0 41.8 41.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.25 0.12 0.19 0.19 0.30 0.19 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 312 817 207 621 337 1444 342 1474 449 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.16 0.10 c0.18 c0.18 0.19 0.13 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.63 0.82 0.95 0.94 0.65 0.67 0.89 0.48 Uniform Delay, d1 56.8 46.8 60.3 56.0 55.8 42.9 52.3 46.8 40.2 Progression Factor 0.87 1.21 1.03 0.96 0.76 0.85 0.91 0.92 1.11 Incremental Delay, d2 29.9 0.9 20.1 23.5 30.7 2.0 2.3 5.2 2.2 Delay (s) 79.4 57.6 82.2 77.2 73.2 38.7 49.9 48.2 46.8 Level of Service E E F E E D D D D Approach Delay (s) 65.3 78.2 47.3 48.1 Approach LOS E E D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 55.9 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 7 2004 PM Peak ' 2557: S 312 St & 28 Av S Federal Way City Center II11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 + + Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 325 0 23 0 0 0 29 153 0 1 150 298 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.96 0.95 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 Hourly flow rate (vph) 342 0 24 0 0 0 32 170 0 1 160 317 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) 366 0 202 478 Volume Left (vph) 342 0 32 1 Volume Right (vph) 24 0 0 317 Hadj (s) 0.16 0.00 0.05 -0.38 Departure Headway (s) 5.8 6.5 5.8 5.0 Degree Utilization, x 0.59 0.00 0.33 0.67 Capacity (veh/h) 576 453 565 690 Control Delay (s) 16.9 9.5 11.6 17.5 Approach Delay (s) 16.9 0.0 11.6 17.5 Approach LOS C A B C Intersection Summary Delay 16.1 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 . • 2004 PM Peak 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 --► -'V 1r *-- k 4� I /,. 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 +T t r I tl+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0,85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1742 3240 1722 3474 1767 1828 1496 1750 3243 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 3240 1722 3474 201 1828 1496 230 3243 Volume (vph) 119 662 129 300 1048 162 261 489 305 184 560 219 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.80 0.80 0.80 Adj. Flow (vph) 134 744 145 341 1191 184 284 532 332 230 700 274 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 9 0 0 0 18 0 29 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 134 877 0 341 1366 0 284 532 314 230 945 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 39.0 30.5 59.0 56.0 39.0 69.5 44.5 32.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 39.0 30.0 59.0 56.0 39.0 69.0 44.0 32.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.28 0.21 0.42 0.40 0.28 0.49 0.31 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 124 903 369 1464 293 509 737 203 741 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.27 0.20 c0.39 c0.13 c0.29 0.09 0.10 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.12 0.26 vlc Ratio 1.08 0.97 0.92 0.93 0.97 1.05 0.43 1.13 1.27 Uniform Delay, d1 65.0 50.0 53.9 38.6 62.3 50.5 22.8 41.7 54.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.87 1.08 1.03 0.94 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 104.1 23.8 23.2 9.9 42.1 51.1 0.1 103.5 134.1 Delay (s) 169.1 73.8 72.1 43.6 109.2 103.2 21.5 145.2 188.1 Level of Service F E E D F F C F F Approach Delay (s) 86.3 49.3 81.0 179.9 Approach LOS F D F F Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 94.8 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 8 50 2004 PM Peak 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 -• � f- *-" 4- 4N t /* \ i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Wl3R IVBL:_ NBT:: NBR: S_B.L SBT S..BR Lane Configurations )) +++ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1,00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3438 4987 3351 4925 1497 3278 4748 3344 5014 1484 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3438 4987 3351 4925 1497 3278 4748 3344 5014 1484 Volume (vph) 413 884 95 324 1022 294 189 796 174 298 868 362 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 430 921 99 372 1175 338 205 865 189 307 895 373 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 0 145 0 28 0 0 0 181 Lane Group Flow (vph) 430 1011 0 372 1175 193 205 1026 0 307 895 192 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (##/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 43.8 20.1 48.9 48.9 12.5 34.8 18.3 40.6 40.6 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 44.8 20.6 50.4 50.4 13.0 35.8 18.8 41.6 41.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.32 0.15 0.36 0.36 0.09 0.26 0.13 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.5 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 368 1596 493 1773 539 304 1214 449 1490 441 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.20 c0.11 c0.24 0.06 c0.22 00.09 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 1.17 0.63 0.75 0.66 0.36 0.67 0.84 0.68 0.60 0.43 Uniform Delay, dl 62.5 40.6 57.3 37.7 32.9 61.5 49.5 57.8 42.1 39.7 Progression Factor 0.81 0.75 0.65 0.64 0.58 0.62 0.79 0.70 0.57 0.49 Incremental Delay, d2 93.1 1.2 4.3 1.5 1.4 4.1 4.8 2.9 0.4 0.2 Delay (s) 143.7 31.8 41.7 25.6 20.5 42.3 43.7 431 24.3 19.8 Level of Service F C D C C D D D C B Approach Delay (s) 65.0 27.9 43.5 26.9 Approach LOS E C D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 39.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 9 51 2004 PM Peak 3055: S 320 St & 23 Av S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 -' --i."t j-*-- A, 4\ T� �► 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL W.BT WBR NBL NBT NBR S.BL SBT SBR Lane Configurations �) W-) M W, I t r 11 TS Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3334 4825 3554 5071 1688 1760 1397 3244 1726 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 3334 4825 3554 5071 1688 1760 1397 3244 1726 Volume (vph) 90 1106 35 303 1465 245 72 155 421 439 143 58 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 102 1257 40 337 1628 272 73 157 425 493 161 65 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 14 0 0 0 4 0 11 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 102 1295 0 337 1886 0 73 157 421 493 215 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (##/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 48.6 30.6 69.6 13.6 17.7 48.3 22.6 26.7 Effective Green, g (s) 9.1 49.6 30.1 70.6 13.1 18.2 48.3 22.1 27.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.35 0.22 0.50 0.09 0.13 0.34 0.16 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1709 764 2557 158 229 482 512 335 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.27 0.09 c0.37 0.04 0.09 c0.19 c0.15 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.76 0.44 0.74 0.46 0.69 0.87 0.96 0.64 Uniform Delay, dl 63.1 39.9 47.7 27.4 60.1 58.2 43.0 58.5 51.9 Progression Factor 0.92 0.43 0.83 0.37 1.20 1.19 1.38 0.84 0.86 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 3.0 0.1 1.5 0.8 6.5 15.3 28.6 2.9 Delay (s) 58.7 20.0 39.5 11.6 73.1 75.7 74.5 77.9 47.3 Level of Service E C D B E E E E D Approach Delay (s) 22.8 15.8 74.6 68.2 Approach LOS C B E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33.0 HCM Level of Service W C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 10 52 2004 PM Peak 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 --* -► -,4, *-- ',- #1 r 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SWL2 S,WL SWR Lane Configurations ++ r ++ N rr Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.88 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1432 1787 3574 1752 2759 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow erm 3487 1432 116 3574 1752 2759 Volume (vph) 0 1530 653 163 1424 0 0 0 411 20 801 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1561 666 172 1499 0 0 0 424 21 826 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1561 481 172 1499 0 0 0 0 445 808 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 77.1 77.1 87.1 77.1 38.4 53.4 Effective Green, g (s) 77.1 77.1 87.1 77.1 37.9 52.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.62 0.55 0.27 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0_ 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1920 789 192 1968 474 1043 v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 0.06 0.42 c0.25 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.34 c0.49 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.61 0.90 0,76 0.94 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 25.6 21.3 49.2 24.3 49.9 38.3 Progression Factor 0.33 0.22 1.17 1.10 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.2 2.8 31.3 2.3 26.1 3.3 Delay (s) 11.7 7.6 88.7 29.1 76.0 41.6 Level of Service B A F C E D Approach Delay (s) 10.5 35.2 0.0 53.7 Approach LOS B D A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 29.1 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0,92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 11 53 2004 PM Peak 3064: S 320 St & Military Rd S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 � � 'r 4- t �► Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT W,BR NBL NBT N_BR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi ti tT + r I + r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1,00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1755 3312 1770 3305 1755 1786 1555 1770 1801 1538 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1755 3312 1770 3305 1755 1786 1555 1770 1801 1538 Volume (vph) 187 1056 208 216 931 178 92 105 88 179 255 189 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 191 1078 212 225 970 185 111 127 106 186 266 197 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 66 0 0 96 Lane Group Flow (vph) 191 1279 0 225 1144 0 111 127 40 186 266 101 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 Bus Blockages (#/hr)_ 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Prot Split Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 63.9 20.2 65.1 13.3 13.3 13.3 22.6 22.6 22.6 Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 63.9 20.2 65.1 13.3 13.3 13.3 22.6 22.6 22.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.46 0.14 0.46 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension W 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 238 1512 255 1537 167 170 148 286 291 248 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.39 c0.13 0.35 0.06 c0.07 0.11 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.85 0.88 0.74 0.66 0.75 0.27 0.65 0.91 0.41 Uniform Delay, dl 58.7 33.7 58.7 30.6 61.2 61.7 58.8 55.0 57.7 52.7 Progression Factor 0.61 0.37 1.13 0.77 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 13.7 4.9 17.3 1.9 7.5 14.4 0.4 4.0 30.7 0.4 Delay (s) 49.8 17.5 83.8 25.6 68.7 76.1 59.2 59.0 88.5 53.1 Level of Service D B F C E E E E F D Approach Delay (s) 21.7 35.1 68.5 69.3 Approach LOS C D E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL vl0\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 12 54 2004 PM Peak 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WSL WBT WBR_ NBL NBT : NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r* $ ) ++% ) W, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1752 1437 3249 1705 1755 4903 1696 4940 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1752 1437 3249 1705 1755 4903 1696 4940 Volume (vph) 72 186 208 340 199 57 207 927 213 134 1060 49 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 209 234 378 221 63 223 997 229 140 1104 51 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 200 0 8 0 0 22 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 209 34 378 276 0 223 1204 0 140 1152 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages #/hr 0 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.1 20.6 20.6 19.5 30.0 28.5 65.9 15.5 52.9 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 20.1 20.1 19.0 29.5 28.0 65.9 15.0 52.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.21 0,20 0.47 0.11 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 122 252 206 441 359 351 2308 182 1867 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.12 c0.12 c0.16 c0.13 0.25 c0.08 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.83 0.16 0.86 0.77 0.64 0.52 0.77 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 63.6 58.3 52.6 59.2 52.0 51.3 26.0 60.8 35.3 Progression Factor 0.70 0.97 2.57 0.96 0.76 0.98 0.87 0.85 0.56 Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 17.6 0.1 14.5 8.6 2.6 0.8 13.2 1.2 Delay (s) 54.0 74.2 135.3 71.2 48.0 62.8 23.5 64.8 21.0 Level of Service D E F E D D C E C Approach Delay (s) 98.4 61.3 28.0 25.8 Approach LOS F E C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 42.3 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSWederal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 13 55 2004 PM Peak 4028: SW 336th St & 21stAv SW Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WER NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ +11 0 1 +T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1754 3287 1769 3286 1741 3292 1791 3354 Fit Permitted 0.07 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.13 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 130 3287 471 3286 244 3292 250 3354 Volume (vph) 249 572 116 264 919 235 218 500 124 238 546 139 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 271 622 126 297 1033 264 242 556 138 248 569 145 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 16 0 0 16 0 0 16 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 271 737 0 297 1281 0 242 678 0 248 698 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr) 1 2 1 1 4 1 4 1 2 2 1 4 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 73.8 56.2 72.0 55.3 45.1 29.6 45.1 29.6 Effective Green, g (s) 74.8 56.7 73.0 55.8 46.1 30.1 46.1 30.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.40 0.52 0.40 0.33 0.22 0.33 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 279 1331 405 1310 251 708 258 721 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.22 0.09 0.39 c0.11 0.21 0.11 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.29 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.55 0.73 0.98 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.97 Uniform Delay, d1 45.3 31.9 21.2 41.5 39.1 54.3 39.0 54.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.37 0.71 1.00 1.00 1.08 0.98 Incremental Delay, d2 45.6 1.7 5.2 18.7 46.3 23.5 44.3 24.9 Delay (s) 90.9 33.6 34.3 48.0 85.4 77.8 86.6 78.2 Level of Service F C C D F E F E Approach Delay (s) 48.9 45.5 79.8 80.4 Approach LOS D D E F Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 60.8 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL 0012004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 14 56 2004 PM Peak 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WOTT W3P. NBL NBT NOR SB� 55T SBJ Lane Configurations + ? +T +I I ++ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1661 1792 1504 1661 3250 1729 3403 1796 3549 1548 Flt Permitted 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 206 1792 1504 245 3250 1729 3403 1796 3549 1548 Volume (vph) 390 435 417 150 415 126 206 991 55 100 1266 286 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 433 483 463 176 488 148 215 1032 57 104 1319 298 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 12 0 21 0 0 3 0 0 0 32 Lane Group Flow (vph) 433 483 451 176 615 0 215 1086 0 104 1319 266 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 54.5 38.5 57.0 38.0 28.0 18.5 54.5 13.5 49.5 70.0 Effective Green, g (s) 56.0 40.0 59.0 40.0 29.0 19.0 55.0 14.0 50.0 72.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0,29 0.42 0.29 0.21 0.14 0.39 0.10 0.36 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 311 512 634 181 673 235 1337 180 1268 796 v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 0.27 0.10 0.08 0.19 c0.12 0.32 0.06 c0.37 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm c0.34 0.20 0.20 0.12 v/c Ratio 1.39 0.94 0.71 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.81 0.58 1.04 0.33 Uniform Delay, dl 43.0 48.9 33.5 43.2 54.3 59.7 37.9 60.2 45.0 19.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.77 1.12 0.88 0.48 Incremental Delay, d2 195.1 25.9 3.1 58.2 16.7 35.6 5.4 2.6 35.8 0.1 Delay (s) 238.2 74.8 36.6 101.5 71.0 93.6 34.7 70.2 75.6 9.7 Level of Service F E D F E F C E E A Approach Delay (s) 113.3 77.6 44.4 63.9 Approach LOS F E D E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 74.2 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 15 57 2004 PM Peak 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations + r T f r T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 1765 1414 1742 1822 1762 1809 1505 1761 1665 Fit Permitted 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 376 1765 1414 676 1822 422 1809 1505 1072 1665 Volume (vph) 36 333 100 266 620 78 71 177 135 220 189 169 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 39 362 109 280 653 82 80 199 152 247 212 190 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 66 0 6 0 0 0 114 0 47 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 362 43 280 729 0 80 199 38 247 355 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 6 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 30.8 27.8 27.8 42.4 34.4 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 Effective Green, g (s) 30.8 27.8 27.8 42.4 34.4 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.40 0.61 0.49 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 224 701 562 556 895 106 455 378 270 419 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.21 c0.07 c0.40 0.11 0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.03 0.24 0.19 0.03 c0.23 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.52 0.08 0.50 0.81 0.75 0.44 0.10 0.91 0.85 Uniform Delay, d1l 12.5 16.0 13.1 7.6 15.1 24.2 22.0 20.1 25.5 24.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.7 0.3 0.3 8.0 23.3 0.2 0.0 32.5 14.1 Delay (s) 12.6 18.7 13.4 7.9 23.1 47.5 22.3 20.2 57.9 39.0 Level of Service B B B A C D C C E D Approach Delay (s) 17.1 18.9 26.2 46.2 Approach LOS B B C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 26.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 16 :, 2004 PM Peak 4840: SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL 85T SBR Lane Configurations 0 '�`�s �► Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 4% -1 % 7% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 3309 1796 3380 1728 3262 1814 3257 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 1737 3309 1796 3380 1728 3262 1814 3257 Volume (vph) 162 725 103 222 1309 183 86 272 48 184 492 310 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0,90 0.90 0.90 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 180 806 114 229 1349 189 101 320 56 219 586 369 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 10 0 0 70 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 180 912 0 229 1530 0 101 366 0 219 885 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 13.5 53.4 19.6 60.6 9.3 19.3 24.7 34.7 Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 54.9 20.1 61.0 9.8 19.8 25.2 35.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0,39 0.14 0.44 0.07 0.14 0.18 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 174 1298 258 1473 121 461 327 819 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.28 0.13 c0.45 0.06 c0.11 0.12 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.03 0.70 0.89 1.04 0.83 0.79 0.67 1.08 Uniform Delay, d1 63.0 35.7 58.8 39.5 64.3 58.1 53.5 52.4 Progression Factor 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.07 Incremental Delay, d2 77.0 3.2 11.6 25.0 35.3 8.5 3.7 54.2 Delay (s) 135.2 36.8 68.1 44.1 99.6 66.6 61.2 110.2 Level of Service F D E D F E E F Approach Delay (s) 52.9 47.2 73.6 101.0 Approach LOS D D E F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 65.4 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 17 2004 PM Peak 4848: S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 11/9/2005 ---* --. -'V 1r '- 4-- t Is. 1 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WRL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT S_BR Lane Configurations tT M ft r Vi tt r +t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 1% 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1690 3228 3276 3363 1506 1661 3376 1480 1762 3495 1490 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1690 3228 3276 3363 1506 1661 3376 1480 1762 3495 1490 Volume (vph) 113 1006 183 426 1445 114 83 257 197 99 637 143 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 124 1105 201 444 1506 119 102 317 243 112 724 162 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 0 42 0 0 206 0 0 77 Lane Group Flow (vph) 124 1296 0 444 1505 77 102 317 37 112 724 85 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% Bus Blockages #/hr) 4 0 4 4 6 4 6 4 0 0 4 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.9 57.7 19.0 65.8 65.8 9.7 18.0 18.0 21.3 29.6 29.6 Effective Green, g (s) 11.9 58.7 20.0 66.8 66.8 10.7 19.0 19.0 22.3 30.6 30.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.42 0.14 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.22 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 144 1353 468 1605 719 127 458 201 281 764 326 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.40 0.14 c0.45 0.06 c0.09 0.06 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.03 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.11 0.80 0.69 0.19 0.40 0.95 0.26 Uniform Delay, dl 63.2 39.4 59.5 34.6 20.2 63.6 57.7 53.6 52.8 53.9 45.3 Progression Factor 0.99 1.02 0.73 0.53 0.37 0.91 1.03 2.72 0.77 0.77 0.52 Incremental Delay, d2 27.2 12.3 21.2 8.3 0.2 27.1 3.5 0.2 0.3 20.2 0.2 Delay (s) 89.7 52.7 64.5 26.8 7.6 85.1 62.7 145.9 40.8 61.7 23.6 Level of Service F D E C A F E F D E C Approach Delay (s) 55.9 33.8 96.7 53.2 Approach LOS E C F D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 51.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 18 2004 PM Peak 5228: SW 356 St & 21st Av SW Federal Way City Center 11/912005 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt tll+ if Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) 0% -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3448 3324 1712 1500 Fit Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 237 3448 3324 1712 1500 Volume (vph) 430 400 639 205 179 332 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 462 430 734 236 188 349 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 23 0 0 288 Lane Group Flow (vph) 462 430 947 0 188 61 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 1 0 0 1 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 50.9 50.9 26.7 12.9 12.9 Effective Green, g (s) 50.9 50.9 26.7 12.9 12.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.36 0.17 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 567 2378 1203 299 262 v/s Ratio Prot c0.21 0.12 0.28 c0.11 vls Ratio Penn c0.35 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.18 0.79 0.63 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 17.2 4.1 21.0 28.2 26.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.4 0.0 3.2 3.0 0.2 Delay (s) 25.5 4.1 24.2 31.2 26.4 Level of Service C A C C C Approach Delay (s) 15.2 24.2 28.1 Approach LOS B C C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 21.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 73.8 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 19 61 2004 PM Peak 5246: S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Wav City Center 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL -NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r V1 T* 1 0 1 f t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1% -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1679 1736 1536 1725 1825 1718 3332 1770 3512 1536 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1679 1736 1536 1725 1825 1718 3332 1770 3512 1536 Volume (vph) 140 229 285 111 302 21 207 372 53 33 930 246 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 161 263 328 132 360 25 225 404 58 34 959 254 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 233 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 87 Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 263 95 132 383 0 225 455 0 34 959 167 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 Turn Type Split Perm Split Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 3 3 4 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.1 24.1 24.1 30.5 30.5 20.6 59.4 5.0 43.8 43.8 Effective Green, g (s) 24.1 24.1 24.1 30.5 30.5 20.6 60.4 5.0 44.8 44.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.22 0.22 0.15 0.43 0.04 0.32 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 289 299 264 376 398 253 1438 63 1124 492 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.15 0.08 c0.21 c0.13 0.14 0.02 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.88 0.36 0.35 0.96 0.89 0.32 0.54 0.85 0.34 Uniform Delay, dl 53.1 56.5 51.2 46.4 54.2 58.6 26.2 66.4 44.5 36.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 0.32 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 23.5 0.3 0.2 32.1 28.5 0.6 1.5 3.0 0.6 Delay (s) 54.4 80.0 51.5 38.8 79.7 87.1 26.8 68.0 26.4 12.2 Level of Service D F D D E F C E C B Approach Delay (s) 62.1 69.3 46.5 24.7 Approach LOS E E D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 45.3 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way =FINAL vl0\2004 PM revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 20 62 2004 PM Peak 5251: S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S Federal Way City Center w 4/14/2006 } _0' � 'r � I,- 4� I ls� # Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S_BL SBT SBR Lane Configurations f' r T 0 1 fT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% _1% 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1746 1498 1766 1734 1796 3545 1734 3522 Flt Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.33 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1296 1498 1139 1734 143 3545 595 3522 Volume (vph) 205 13 227 26 17 16 280 771 13 15 1121 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.74 0.74 0.90 0.93 0.90 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 220 14 244 35 23 18 301 857 14 16 1180 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 205 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 234 39 35 26 0 301 870 0 16 1180 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 40.0 21.1 20.1 20.1 82.0 82.0 56.1 56.1 Effective Green, g (s) 42.0 22.1 22.1 22.1 83.0 83.0 58.1 58.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0,30 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.59 0.59 0.42 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 453 236 180 274 320 2102 247 1462 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.01 c0.13 0.25 0.34 v/s Ratio Perm c0.08 0.03 0.03 c0.42 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.16 0.19 0.09 0.94 0.41 0.06 0.81 Uniform Delay, dl 40.6 51.0 51.2 50.4 43.0 15.4 24.6 36.0 Progression Factor 0.25 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.04 1.33 1.31 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 33.8 0.6 0.4 4.2 Delay (s) 10.3 33.9 51.4 50.4 80.6 16.6 33.2 51.5 Level of Service B C D D F B C D Approach Delay (s) 22.4 50.9 33.1 51.2 Approach LOS C D C D Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 39.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 63 2004 AM Base 52, S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 � '- 4.,, `\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W.BI .. t4BL NB.T NBR SBL -SBT SBR Lane Configurations tl* *"T ft I ++ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1,00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 3368 1468 2937 1728 3442 1476 1688 3251 1466 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1764 3368 1468 2937 1728 3442 1476 1688 3251 1466 Volume (vph) 153 264 26 193 211 147 100 1156 551 167 322 50 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.80 0.80 0.80 Adj. Flow (vph) 210 362 36 241 264 184 137 1584 755 209 402 62 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 67 0 0 0 238 0 0 35 Lane Group Flow (vph) 210 392 0 207 415 0 137 1584 517 209 402 27 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% Bus Blockages #/hr) 2 2 6 6 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.3 16.3 17.7 17.7 13.2 52.0 52.0 14.0 52.8 52.8 Effective Green, g (s) 16.3 16.3 17.7 17.7 13.2 52.0 52.0 14.0 52.8 52.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.12 0.44 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 240 457 217 433 190 1492 640 197 1430 645 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.12 0.14 c0.14 0.08 c0.46 c0.12 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.35 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.86 0.95 0.96 0.72 1.06 0.81 1.06 0.28 0.04 Uniform Delay, dl 50.9 50.7 50.7 50.8 51.6 34.0 29.6 53.0 21.5 19.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 27.1 14.2 47.5 32.0 10.8 41.6 10.5 81.2 0.0 0.0 Delay (s) 78.0 64.9 98.2 82.7 62.4 75.6 40.2 134.2 21.5 19.2 Level of Service E E F F E E D F C B Approach Delay (s) 69.4 87.4 64.1 56.3 Approach LOS E F E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 67.2 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 2004 AM Base 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI_ SBT SBR Lane Configurations t'. tt 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % -3% 6% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3234 1814 3479 1614 1643 1523 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3234 1814 3479 1614 1643 1523 Volume (vph) 0 1097 234 228 384 0 0 0 0 176 7 207 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1425 304 268 452 0 0 0 0 210 8 246 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1717 0 268 452 0 0 0 0 106 112 27 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr) 2 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Split Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 6 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 73.7 18.0 96.7 13.3 13.3 13.3 Effective Green, g (s) 73.7 18.0 96.7 13.3 13.3 13.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.15 0.81 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1986 272 2803 179 182 169 v/s Ratio Prot c0.53 c0.15 0.13 0.07 c0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.99 0.16 0.59 0.62 0.16 Uniform Delay, dl 19.0 50.9 2.6 50.8 50.9 48.3 Progression Factor 1.00 0.63 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.3 48.8 0.1 3.5 4.3 0.2 Delay (s) 24A 80.8 0.9 54.2 55.2 48.5 Level of Service C F A D E D Approach Delay (s) 24.4 30.7 0.0 51.4 Approach LOS C C A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 30.2 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 2 65 2004 AM Base 59: S 272 St & 272 -1-5 NB Ramp Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 -A � -V � t t d Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations I + TT r *T r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1 % -1 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1870 1600 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1870 1600 Volume (vph) 595 631 0 0 377 788 174 10 370 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.68 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 676 717 0 0 410 857 196 11 416 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 237 0 0 188 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 676 717 0 0 410 620 0 207 228 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 42.7 90.7 43.0 43.0 19.3 19.3 Effective Green, g (s) 42.7 90.7 43.0 43.0 19.3 19.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.76 0.36 0.36 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 608 2473 1228 494 301 257 v/s Ratio Prot c0.40 0.22 0.12 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm c0.45 c0.14 v/c Ratio 1.11 0.29 0.33 1.26 0.69 0.89 Uniform Delay, dl 38.6 4.6 28.1 38.5 47.5 49.3 Progression Factor 0.79 0.44 0.64 1.20 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 63.7 0.2 0.1 116.6 5.1 27.9 Delay (s) 94.1 2.2 17.9 162.9 52.6 77.2 Level of Service F A B F D E Approach Delay (s) 46.8 116.0 69.0 0.0 Approach LOS D F E A Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 77.7 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 3 2004 AM Base Federal Way City Center Project 60: S 272 St & Military Rd S 11/9/2005 ---* --. --t , '- Q t 1 41 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL.: NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T Vi +111 t r T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% .3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane UbI. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 3268 1770 3289 1759 1804 1470 1775 1699 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1748 3268 1770 3289 1759 1804 1470 1775 1699 Volume (vph) 394 584 109 109 681 110 476 578 159 54 120 78 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 475 704 131 118 740 120 547 664 183 61 136 89 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 11 0 0 0 88 0 21 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 475 822 0 118 849 0 547 664 95 61 204 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 3 0 0 4 2 4 2 3 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.0 40.0 11.0 26.0 31.7 41.0 41.0 8.0 17.3 Effective Green, g (s) 25.0 40.0 11.0 26.0 31.7 41.0 41.0 8.0 17.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.33 0.09 0.22 0.26 0.34 0.34 0.07 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 364 1089 162 713 465 616 502 118 245 v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 0.25 0,07 c0.26 c0.31 c0.37 0.03 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 v/c Ratio 1.30 0.76 0.73 1.19 1.18 1.08 0.19 0.52 0.83 Uniform Delay, dl 47.5 35.6 53.0 47.0 44.1 39.5 27.8 54.1 50.0 Progression Factor 0.91 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 154.5 4.5 12.9 99.5 99.9 59.1 0.1 1.6 20.2 Delay (s) 197.7 34.1 66.0 146.5 144.0 98.6 27.9 55.7 70.2 Level of Service F C E F F F C E E Approach Delay (s) 93.4 136.7 107A 67.1 Approach LOS F F F E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 107.0 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.22 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 4 67 2004 AM Base 1651: S Dash Point Rd & Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 --* 0 -V 4\ 1 ' 14 1 4/ '( */ Movement EBL2 EBL EBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR SWL SWR Lane Configurations M r ft tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% -1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3338 1503 1729 3342 3364 1539 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3338 1503 777 3342 3364 1539 Volume (vph) 813 0 145 138 521 0 0 389 207 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.90 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 874 0 156 150 566 0 0 442 235 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 49 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 874 0 46 150 566 0 0 442 186 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 2% 1 % 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 0 6 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 Turn Type custom custom pm+pt pm+ov Protected Phases 8 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 8 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 34.3 34.3 73.7 73.7 58.6 92.9 Effective Green, g (s) 35.3 35.3 74.7 74.7 59.6 94.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.62 0.62 0.50 0.79 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 982 442 564 2080 1671 1281 v/s Ratio Prot c0.26 0.02 c0.17 0.13 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.14 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.15 Uniform Delay, d1 40.5 30.8 9.8 10.3 17.5 3.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.9 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.0 Delay (s) 50.4 30.9 9.9 10.6 17.9 3.0 Level of Service D C A B B A Approach Delay (s) 47.4 10.5 12.7 0.0 Approach LOS D B B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 26.8 _._. HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 5 M. 2004 AM Base 3028: S 320 St & 21 st Av SW Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST. NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3317 1748 3342 1748 1801 1459 1755 3154 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3317 1748 3342 1748 1801 1459 1755 3154 Volume (vph) 334 709 114 88 233 23 194 527 338 80 246 153 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.66 Adj. Flow (vph) 428 909 146 114 303 30 269 732 469 121 373 232 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 0 115 0 79 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 428 1046 0 114 328 0 269 732 354 121 526 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 3 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 3 3 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.4 43.0 10.7 17.3 40.4 56.0 56.0 10.0 25.6 Effective Green, g (s) 36.4 43.0 10.7 17.3 40.4 56.0 56.0 10.0 25.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.31 0.08 0.12 0.29 0.40 0.40 0.07 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 461 1021 134 414 506 722 585 126 578 v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 c0.32 0.07 0.10 0.15 c0.41 0.07 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.93 1.02 0.85 0.79 0.53 1.01 0.61 0.96 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 50.4 48.3 63.7 59.4 41.7 41.8 33.1 64.7 55.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 24.6 34.5 36.3 9.3 0.5 37.0 1.2 67.3 17.9 Delay (s) 75.0 82.9 100.0 68.8 42.2 78.8 34.3 131.9 73.8 Level of Service E F F E D E C F E Approach Delay (s) 80.6 76.7 57.9 83.5 Approach LOS F E E F Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 72.6 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 139.7 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 6 At 2004 AM Base 3040: S 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way Cit Center Project 11/912005 --* --o. --t fe*-- *,- 4\ T /' 1 W Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT .SBR Lane Configurations 0 ti� + r I t� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1742 3238 1689 3357 1743 1810 1477 1750 3326 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 3238 1689 3357 751 1810 1477 214 3326 Volume (vph) 241 1006 204 123 247 67 52 380 242 105 334 61 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 262 1093 222 168 338 92 62 452 288 124 393 72 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 19 0 0 0 40 0 12 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 262 1301 0 168 411 0 62 452 248 124 453 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % I % 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.2 48.0 13.0 38.8 37.2 30.9 43.9 44.4 34.5 Effective Green, g (s) 21.2 48.0 12.0 38.8 36.2 30.9 42.9 43.4 34.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.40 0.10 0.32 0.30 0.26 0.36 0.36 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 308 1297 169 1087 271 467 529 192 958 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.40 c0.10 0.12 0.01 c0.25 0.05 c0.05 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.12 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.38 0.23 0.97 0.47 0.65 0.47 Uniform Delay, dl 47.8 35.9 53.9 31.2 30.3 44.0 29.7 30.0 35.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 19.0 25.7 67.1 1.0 0.2 32.9 0.2 5.5 0.1 Delay (s) 66.7 61.6 120.9 32.2 30.5 76.9 29.9 35.5 35.3 Level of Service E E F C C E C D D Approach Delay (s) 62.4 57.1 56.4 35.3 Approach LOS E E E D Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 55.7 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 119.8 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 ,c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECT&Federal Way CCTINAL v1012004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 7 70 2004 AM Base 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 --* -• --t f- '- 4- 4N T/0- 1 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W.BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SB:T SBR Lane Configurations tt r ft 4 rr Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.88 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3454 1439 1770 3539 1726 2706 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3454 1439 159 3539 1726 2706 Volume (vph) 0 1350 444 183 946 0 0 0 0 190 8 599 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1588 522 226 1168 0 0 0 0 207 9 651 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 651 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1588 347 226 1168 0 0 0 0 0 216 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles %) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split NA Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 66.3 66.3 83.8 83.8 17.2 0.0 Effective Green, g (s) 66.3 66.3 83.8 83.8 16.2 0.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.60 0.76 0.76 0.15 0.00 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2082 867 304 2696 _ 254 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.46 c0.08 0.33 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 c0.48 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.40 0.74 0.43 0.85 0.00 Uniform Delay, dl 16.1 11.4 27.8 4.7 45.7 55.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.53 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 1.4 7.9 0.5 22.1 0.0 Delay (s) 18.8 12.8 43.4 7.6 67.8 55.0 Level of Service B B D A E D Approach Delay (s) 17.3 13.4 0.0 58.2 Approach LOS B B A E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 24.2 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group CAPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 8 71 2004 AM Base 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r ►j +1 tT I +} r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1643 1774 1501 1628 3234 1680 3279 1745 3448 1509 Fit Permitted 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 490 1774 1501 274 3234 1680 3279 1745 3448 1509 Volume (vph) 100 335 169 55 327 61 351 584 69 51 306 190 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 128 429 217 71 419 78 403 671 79 55 333 207 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 99 0 14 0 0 8 0 0 0 92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 128 429 118 71 483 0 403 742 0 55 333 115 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6_ 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.2 27.7 56.0 31.8 25.5 28.3 44.8 7.2 23.7 32.2 Effective Green, g (s) 38.2 28.7 58.0 33.8 26.5 29.3 45.8 8.2 24.7 34.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.26 0.53 0.31 0.24 0.27 0.42 0,07 0.22 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 270 463 860 174 779 447 1365 130 774 538 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.24 0.04 0.03 0.15 c0.24 c0.23 0.03 c0.10 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.04 0.10 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.93 0.14 0.41 0.62 0.90 0.54 0.42 0.43 0.21 Uniform Delay, d1 26.1 39.6 13.3 29.2 37.3 39.0 24.2 48.6 36.6 28.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 24.2 0.0 0.6 1.1 20.6 1.6 0.8 1.7 0.1 Delay (s) 26.6 63.9 13.3 29.8 38.4 59.6 25.8 49.4 38.4 28.0 Level of Service C E B C D E C D D C Approach Delay (s) 43.5 37.3 37.6 35.8 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection Summer HCM Average Control Delay _ 38.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Fedoral Way CCIFINAL v1012004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 9 72 2004 AM Base 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I + r 11� + i I t Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Utll. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.98 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1718 1765 1422 1745 1769 1761 1792 1575 1750 1791 Fit Permitted 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.61 1.00 1.00 0.69 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1140 1765 1422 561 1769 1129 1792 1575 1264 1791 Volume (vph) 75 563 174 75 142 51 65 98 169 60 157 9 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 82 612 189 79 149 54 73 110 190 67 176 10 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 90 0 17 0 0 0 161 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 612 99 79 186 0 73 110 29 67 182 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 6 2 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.0 29.2 29.2 32.0 29.2 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 Effective Green, g (s) 32.0 29.2 29.2 32.0 29.2 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.53 0.53 0.58 0.53 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 685 927 747 383 929 175 277 244 196 277 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.35 c0.01 0.11 0.06 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.07 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.66 0.13 0.21 0.20 0.42 0.40 0.12 0.34 0.66 Uniform Delay, d1 5.3 9.6 6.7 6.0 7.0 21.2 21.2 20.2 21.0 22.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 3.7 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.4 4.2 Delay (s) 5.3 13.3 7.1 6.1 7.5 21.8 21.5 20.3 21.4 26.3 Level of Service A B A A A C C C C C Approach Delay (s) 11.2 7.1 21.0 25.0 Approach LOS B A C C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 14.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 55.6 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 AM Base revised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 10 73 2004 Saturday Midday Base 52: S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL ERT ESR. ►; BL. WBT WBR, . -N-K NjB;T NSR $BL S_ t3T SRR Lane Configurations I +T+ ►� 4T tt rrt t¢ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0,95 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0,99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0,96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prof) 1747 3255 1511 3111 1728 3442 1484 1738 3346 1510 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 T107 3255 1511 3111 1728 3442 1484 1738 3346 1510 Volume (vph) 364 107 367 317 110 193 716 440 310 981 57 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 115 391 115 432 373 129 205 762 468 333 1055 61 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 18 0 0 0 312 0 0 16 Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 483 0 299 617 0 205 762 156 333 1055 45 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 6 6 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.4 20.4 24.0 24.0 15.0 29.5 29.5 23.6 38.1 38.1 Effective Green, g (s) 20.4 20.4 24,0 24.0 15.0 29.5 29.5 23.6 38.1 38.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.20 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.32 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 303 565 309 635 221 864 373 349 1085 490 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.15 0.20 c0.20 0.12 0.22 c0.19 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.88 0.42 0.95 0.97 0.09 Uniform Delay, d1 43.0 47.1 46.4 46.4 50.7 42.3 36.8 46.4 39.2 27.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 11.6 41.8 28.6 40.1 12.6 3.4 35.7 21.4 0.4 Delay (s) 43.2 58.7 88.1 75.0 90.8 54.9 40.3 82.2 60.6 28.0 Level of Service D E F E F D D F E C Approach Delay (s) 55.9 79.2 55.3 64.2 Approach LOS E E E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 63.3 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 117.5 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 74 2004 Saturday Midday Base 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 * Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 f t I #T if Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % -3% 6% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3163 1814 3479 1614 1642 1623 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3163 1814 3479 1614 1642 1523 Volume (vph) 0 811 270 148 403 0 0 0 0 292 9 353 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.97 0.97 0.97 0,89 0.89 0.89 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 954 318 183 498 0 0 0 0 328 10 397 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 342 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1249 0 183 498 0 0 0 0 164 174 55 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Split Perm Protected Phases 4 3 8 6 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 69.4 19.0 93.4 16.6 16.6 16.6 Effective Green, g (s) 69.4 19.0 93.4 16.6 16.6 16.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.16 0.78 0.14 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1829 287 2708 223 227 211 v/s Ratio Prot c0.39 c0.10 0.14 0.10 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.64 0.18 0.74 0.77 0.26 Uniform Delay, dl 17.6 47.3 3.4 49.6 49.8 46.2 Progression Factor 1.00 0.62 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 3.3 0.1 10.3 13.0 0.2 Delay (s) 19.7 32.4 0.7 59.9 62.8 46.5 Level of Service B C A E E D Approach Delay (s) 19.7 9.3 0.0 53.3 Approach LOS B A A D Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 26.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 2 75 2004 Saturday Midday Base 59: S 272 St & 272 - I-5 NB Ramp Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR- NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I Tt f t K 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1 % -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1872 1600 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm_) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1872 1600 Volume (vph) 452 600 0 0 358 393 152 13 135 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 497 659 0 0 402 442 179 15 159 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 0 78 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 497 659 0 0 402 327 0 194 81 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#!!/hr) 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 93.5 45.5 45.5 16.5 16.5 Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 93.5 45.5 45.5 16.5 16.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.78 0.38 0.38 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 613 2549 1300 _2.0 523 257 220 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 0.20 0.12 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm c0.24 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.26 0.31 0.63 0.75 0.37 Uniform Delay, dl 34.8 3.7 26.2 30.3 49.8 47.0 Progression Factor 1.19 1.30 0.45 0.25 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.9 0.2 0.5 4.3 10.6 0.4 Delay (s) 47.5 5.0 12.2 11.9 60.4 47.4 Level of Service D A B B E D Approach Delay (s) 23.3 12.0 54.5 0.0 Approach LOS C. B D A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 23.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 3 76 2004 Saturday Midday Base 60: S 272 St & Military Rd S Federal Way City Center Project _ 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBl- WBT WBR :NI3L. NBT NBR SBL S.B.T., SBR Lane Configurations 0 t r I T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) .3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flpb, pad/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 3168 1770 3300 1759 1804 1470 1775 1713 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1748 3168 1770 3300 1759 1804 1470 1775 1713 Volume (vph) 82 491 202 88 509 73 284 176 72 67 200 109 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 84 501 206 98 566 81 312 193 79 73 217 118 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 34 0 0 8 0 0 0 51 0 17 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 673 0 98 639 0 312 193 28 73 318 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 3 0 0 4 2 4 2 3 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.7 39.3 10.7 42.3 25.1 42.6 42.6 7.4 24.9 Effective Green, g (s) 7.7 39.3 10.7 42.3 25.1 42.6 42.6 7.4 24.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.33 0.09 0.35 0.21 0.36 0.36 0.06 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 112 1038 158 1163 368 640 522 109 355 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.21 c0.06 0.19 c0.18 0.11 0.04 c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.65 0.62 0.55 0.85 0.30 0.05 0.67 0.89 Uniform Delay, d9 55.2 34.4 52.7 31.2 45.6 28.0 25.4 55.1 46.3 Progression Factor 0.75 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.3 3.0 5.3 1.9 15.8 0.1 0.0 11.4 23.2 Delay (s) 62.8 23.2 58.0 33.1 61.4 28.1 25.5 66.5 69.4 Level of Service E C E C E C C E E Approach Delay (s) 27.4 36.3 45.5 68.9 Approach LOS C D D E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 40.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1 % ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 4 VAIA 2004 Saturday Midday Base 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SRR Lane Configurations I Tl tk ) W� ) tt+ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1730 3222 1531 2868 1708 4718 1722 4796 1472 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1730 3222 1531 2868 1708 4718 1722 4796 1472 Volume (vph) 225 358 107 205 472 135 236 981 112 213 945 143 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.82 0.82 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 239 381 114 225 519 148 251 1044 119 260 1152 174 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 29 0 0 24 0 0 13 0 0 0 94 Lane Group Flow (vph) 239 466 0 225 643 0 251 1150 0 260 1152 80 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 16% 16% 16% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type Split Split _4 Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 3 3 4 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.4 20.4 23.0 23.0 21.0 25.6 21.0 25.6 25.6 Effective Green, g (s) 20.4 20.4 23.0 23.0 21.0 25.6 21.0 25.6 25.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.23 0.19 0.23 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 321 598 320 600 326 1098 329 1116 343 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.14 0.15 c0.22 0.15 c0.24 c0.15 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.78 0.70 1.07 0.77 1.05 0.79 1.03 0.23 Uniform Delay, dl 42.3 42.7 40.3 43.5 42.2 42.2 42.4 42.2 34.2 Progression Factor 0.92 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.1 5.2 5.6 57.6 9.5 40.4 11.4 35.6 1.6 Delay (s) 46.2 44.8 46.0 101.1 51.7 82.6 53.8 77.8 35.8 Level of Service D D D F D F D E D Approach Delay (s) 45.3 87.2 77.1 69.2 Approach LOS D F E E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 71.3 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL 0012004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 5 EN 2004 Saturday Midday Base 2750: S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 � i � "r � � � Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WB.T WBR NBL NBT : NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi 1 T* ) ++T* ) +tT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0,98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1733 1590 1620 1569 1718 4750 1770 4750 Fit Permitted 0.44 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 809 1590 179 1569 1718 4554 1770 4845 Volume (vph) 111 144 232 239 119 138 246 1060 310 154 1096 48 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 163 212 341 379 189 219 286 1233 360 183 1305 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 49 0 0 35 0 0 44 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 504 0 379 373 0 286 1549 0 183 1358 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 6% 6% 6% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages #Ihr 2 0 4 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 38.0 32.0 56.0 44.0 18.0 37.0 11.0 30.0 Effective Green, g (s) 40.0 33.0 57.0 45.0 18.0 37.0 11.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.28 0.48 0.38 0.15 0.31 0.09 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 324 437 313 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.32 c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 c0.38 v/c Ratio 0.50 1.15 1.21 Uniform Delay, d1 30.3 43.5 52.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 92.5 120.8 Delay (s) 30.7 136.0 173.5 Level of Service C F F Approach Delay (s) 112.1 Approach LOS F Intersection Summa 588 258 1465 162 1188 0.24 0.17 c0.33 0.10 c0.29 0.63 1.11 1.06 1.13 1.14 30.8 51.0 41.5 54.5 45.0 1.00 0.89 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.7 75.5 35.5 109.8 74.9 32.4 120.9 54.9 164.3 119.9 C F D F F 100.4 64.9 125.2 F E F HCM Average Control Delay 96.3 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.16 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 6 79 2004 Saturday Midday Base 3040: S 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S$T S$R Lane Configurations I tt ►j +T I +r r +14 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1742 3282 1689 3409 1750 1810 1483 1750 3324 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 3282 1689 3409 473 1810 1483 235 3324 Volume (vph) 110 1020 108 360 970 124 170 449 439 136 317 58 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 120 1109 117 493 1329 170 202 535 623 160 373 68 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 7 0 0 0 12 0 9 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 120 1221 0 493 1492 0 202 535 511 160 432 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 48.0 36.0 72.0 52.0 37.0 73.0 42.4 31.4 Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 48.0 35.0 72.0 52.0 37.0 72.0 41.4 31.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.32 0.23 0.48 0.35 0.25 0.48 0.28 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 128 1050 394 1636 297 446 712 166 696 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.37 c0.29 0.44 0.07 c0.30 0.17 c0.06 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.18 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.94 1.16 1.25 0.91 0.68 1.20 0.72 0.96 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 69.2 51.0 57.5 36.1 37.5 56.5 30.9 71.9 53.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 59.3 83.8 132.5 9.3 5.0 109.7 2.9 58.4 1.2 Delay (s) 128.5 134.8 190.0 45.3 42.5 166.2 33.8 130.3 55.0 Level of Service F F F D D F C F E Approach Delay (s) 134.2 81.1 91.4 75.1 Approach LOS F F F E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 96.7 HCM Level of Service �F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.18 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 7 IM 2004 Saturday Midday Base 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 ---* -• -V r '- 4�- t l 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL S:BT SBR Lane Configurations )) +0 ++ + r )) ++T 11 +?+ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util, Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 M Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3438 5030 3319 4876 1483 3246 4684 3312 4965 1472 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3438 5030 3319 4876 1483 3246 4684 3312 4965 1472 Volume (vph) 589 1055 54 454 945 268 211 723 184 330 850 413 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.80 0.80 0.80 Adj. Flow (vph) 647 1159 59 547 1139 323 243 831 211 412 1062 516 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 0 207 0 37 0 0 0 257 Lane Group Flow (vph) 647 1213 0 547 1139 116 243 1005 0 412 1062 259 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.0 35.7 20.8 32.5 32.5 13.5 28.2 15.0 29.7 29.7 Effective Green, g (s) 24.0 36.0 20.8 32.8 32.8 13.5 28.2 15.0 29.7 29.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.30 0.17 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.24 0.12 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.3 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 688 1509 575 1333 405 365 1101 414 1229 364 v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.24 0.16 0.23 0.07 c0.21 0.12 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.29 0.67 0.91 1.00 0.86 0.71 Uniform Delay, d9 47.3 38.7 49.1 41.3 34.4 51.1 44.7 52.5 43.2 41.3 Progression Factor 0.79 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 0.32 0.72 0.67 0.52 Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 1.6 25.6 7.1 1.8 2.1 7.1 12.1 0.6 0.5 Delay (s) 46.9 34.3 74.7 48.5 36.1 24.4 21.5 49.7 29.6 22.1 Level of Service D C E D D C C D C C Approach Delay (s) 38.7 53.6 22.0 31.8 Approach LOS D D C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.0 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 8 2004 Saturday Midday Base 3052: S 320 St & 20 Av S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 � � � { � 4- 4\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL W:BT WBR :NBL NBT N$R SBL SB.T. SBR Lane Configurations ) +0 Vi ttt T* 1� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 2% _1% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.92 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1796 5020 1670 4558 1756 1744 1710 1668 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.16 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1796 5020 1670 4558 336 1744 327 1668 Volume (vph) 500 1215 131 366 1292 356 206 156 _ 151 316 236 286 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.77 0.77 0.77 Adj. Flow (vph) 595 1446 156 441 1557 429 248 188 182 410 306 371 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 45 0 0 32 0 0 40 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 595 1590 0 441 1941 0 248 338 0 410 637 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 7% 7% 7% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#//hr) 0 6 0 0 8 0 8 0 6 6 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 44.0 13.0 44.0 36.0 23.0 36.0 23.0 Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 44.0 12.0 44.0 34.0 22.0 34.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.40 0.11 0.40 0.31 0.20 0.31 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 196 2008 182 1823 259 349 252 334 v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 0.32 c0.26 c0.43 0.10 0.19 c0.18 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.33 v/c Ratio 3.04 0.79 2.42 1.06 0.96 0.97 1.63 1.91 Uniform Delay, dl 49.0 29.0 49.0 33.0 50.8 43.7 33.7 44.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 929.6 3.3 641.9 30.5 43.5 39.1 299.6 419.3 Delay (s) 978.6 32.3 689.8 86.7 94.3 82.8 333.3 463.3 Level of Service F C F F F F F F Approach Delay (s) 288.6 196.3 87.4 414.3 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 255.1 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 119.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 9 2004 Saturday Midday Base 3055: S 320 St & 23 Av S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 } -1, -,* 1- 4--- 4- i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT_ SBR Lane Configurations )) +0 )) ++1 + r T* Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1,00 0.99 Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3367 4862 3554 5060 1721 1795 1418 3277 1685 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3367 4862 3554 5060 1721 1795 1418 3277 1685 Volume (vph) 179 1486 67 469 1862 349 50 156 317 435 148 135 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.76 0.76 0.76 Adj. Flow (vph) 206 1708 77 515 2046 384 56 173 352 572 195 178 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 25 0 0 0 1 0 28 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 206 1781 0 515 2405 0 56 173 351 572 345 0 Confl. Peds. (#F/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 40.4 11.0 40.2 6.9 14.8 25.8 25.4 33.3 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 40.2 10.0 40.2 5.9 15.4 25.4 24.4 33.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.37 0.09 0,37 0.05 0.14 0.23 0.22 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.8 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.6 4.0 4.0 5.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 1.2 2.0 1.2 2.0 1.4 2.0 _2.0 _ 1.4 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 306 1777 323 1849 92 251 392 727 519 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.37 c0.14 c0.48 0.03 0.10 c0.08 c0.17 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.67 1.00 1.59 1.30 0.61 0.69 0.90 0.79 0.66 Uniform Delay, dl 48.4 34.9 50.0 34.9 50.9 45.0 41.0 40.3 33.1 Progression Factor 0.79 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 11.6 281.7 139.3 7.6 6.2 21.7 5.2 2.5 Delay (s) 39.5 34.8 331.7 174.2 58.5 51.2 62.7 45.5 35.6 Level of Service D C F F E D E D D Approach Delay (s) 35.3 201.8 58.9 41.6 Approach LOS D F E D Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 114.2 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 10 2004 Saturday Midday Base 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR . NBL iNBT NBR SBL SBT •SBR Lane Configurations �► �� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.88 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3454 1432 1770 3539 1724 2706 At Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3454 1432 98 3539 1724 2706 Volume (vph) 0 1838 623 149 1487 0 0 0 0 126 3 730 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2162 733 184 1836 0 0 0 0 137 3 793 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2162 540 184 1836 0 0 0 0 0 140 767 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 76.0 76.0 86.0 76.0 20.0 35.0 Effective Green, g (s) 76.0 76.0 86.0 76.0 19.0 34.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.63 0.72 0.63 0.16 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2188 907 210 2241 273 767 v/s Ratio Prot c0.63 0.07 0.52 0.08 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.38 0.56 v/c Ratio 0.99 0.60 0.88 0.82 0.51 1.00 Uniform Delay, dl 21.6 12.9 50.3 16.8 46.3 43.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 16.6 2.9 30.1 3.5 0.7 32.6 Delay (s) 38.2 15.8 80.5 20.3 46.9 75.6 Level of Service D B F C D E Approach Delay (s) 32.5 25.7 0.0 71.3 Approach LOS C C A E Intersection Summavy HCM Average Control Delay 36.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 11 al 2004 Saturday Midday Base 3058: S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 -' --. -V 'r .- 4- 4\ t /P. \*. 1 Movement EBL EBT EM WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NSR SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations 0 r ft r 4� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 2% 3% Total Last time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 3284 1371 3455 1439 1648 1584 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (perm) 3284 1371 3455 1439 1648 1584 Volume (vph) 0 1065 903 0 1025 113 594 2 102 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.78 0.78 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1121 951 0 1165 128 762 3 131 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 0 11 0 16 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1168 902 0 1165 117 473 407 0 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (% 4% 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % Turn Type Free Perm Split Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 66.9 110,0 66.9 66.9 34.1 34.1 Effective Green, g (s) 66.9 110.0 66.9 66.9 33.1 33.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 1.00 0.61 0.61 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1997 1371 2101 875 496 477 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 0.34 c0.29 0.26 v/s Ratio Perm c0.66 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.66 0.55 0.13 0.95 0,85 Uniform Delay, d1 13.1 0.0 12.7 9.2 37.7 36.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 2.5 1.1 0.3 28.6 13.3 Delay (s) 14.4 2.5 13.8 9,5 66.3 49.5 Level of Service B A B A E D Approach Delay (s) 9.2 13.4 58.4 0.0 Approach LOS A B E A Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 20.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 5.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 12 m 2004 Saturday Midday Base 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r 1� ttt+ ) ttT* Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1744 1718 1420 3041 1592 1738 4831 1713 4941 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 1744 1718 1420 3041 1592 1738 4831 1713 4941 Volume (vph) 121 161 125 249 227 73 218 894 256 223 1036 113 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.87 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph) 149 199 154 323 295 95 240 982 281 256 1191 130 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 130 0 10 0 0 42 0 0 11 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 149 199 24 323 380 0 240 1221 0 256 1310 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 9% 9% 9% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.5 17.6 17.6 23.6 29.7 18.2 36.8 19.0 37.6 Effective Green, g (s) 12.5 18.6 18.6 24.6 30.7 18.2 36.8 20.0 38.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.20 0.26 0.15 0.31 0.17 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (M 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 182 266 220 623 407 264 1482 286 1589 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.12 0.11 c0.24 0.14 c0.25 0.15 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.75 0.11 0.52 0.93 0.91 0.82 0.90 0.82 Uniform Delay, dl 52.6 48.5 43.6 42.4 43.7 50.1 38.6 49.0 37.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.66 0.58 Incremental Delay, d2 22.9 9.6 0.1 0.3 28.2 31.6 5.3 17.2 2.8 Delay (s) 75.6 58.1 43.7 42.7 71.8 81.6 43.9 49.3 24.7 Level of Service E E D D E F D D C Approach Delay (s) 58.9 58.7 49.9 28.7 Approach LOS E E D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 44.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTS1Federal Way CCIFINAL v1012004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 13 :• F 2004 Saturday Midday Base 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center Project 11/9/2005 Movement EBL EBT EBR W. BL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBRR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi + r Vi T} # r Ta Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1726 1765 1423 1745 1803 1738 1792 1512 1746 1659 Fit Permitted 0.49 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 891 1765 1423 590 1803 1028 1792 1512 1280 1659 Volume (vph) 72 508 125 188 343 70 108 90 180 89 122 78 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 75 529 130 194 354 72 112 94 188 93 127 81 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 68 0 10 0 0 0 159 0 44 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 529 62 194 416 0 112 94 29 93 164 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3_ 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.0 25.3 25.3 31.8 27.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 Effective Green, g (s) 28.0 25.3 25.3 31.8 27.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.48 0.48 0.60 0.51 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 511 839 677 453 922 160 280 236 200 259 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.30 c0.04 0.23 0.05 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.04 0.22 c0.11 0.02 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.15 0.63 0.09 0.43 0.45 0.70 0.34 0.12 0.46 0.63 Uniform Delay, d1 6.3 10.4 7.6 5.7 8.3 21.3 20.0 19.3 20.4 21.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 10.7 0.3 0.1 0.6 3.7 Delay (s) 6.3 11.6 7.7 6.0 8.4 32.0 20.3 19.4 21.1 24.7 Level of Service A B A A A C C B C C Approach Delay (s) 10.4 7.6 23.2 23.6 Approach LOS B A C C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 13.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 53.2 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group C:IPROJECTSIFederal Way CCIFINAL v10\2004 SATrevised v11.sy7 Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 14 ,39 Blank -�s Appendix F. Collision Data Attached are tables that the details of the collision analysis for intersections and for corridors. The areas described cover the FWCC study area and provide information on the number of collisions, collision injuries/fatalities, cost and severity. Data and the spreadsheets were provided from the City of Federal Way's City Center Access Study (2004) for this analysis. Documents: 1. Existing Intersection Collision Rate Summa 2000-2003 2. Collision Corridor Rate Summary (2000-2003} 89 Blank •f Intersection Collision Rate Summary (2000-2003) Intersection # Fatal # Injury # PDO Total Collisions Cost Severity Rate Collision Rate SR 991272nd St 0 34 79 113 $1,330.000 $22,069 1.88 SR 991 S 28M St 0 26 53 79 $980,000 $17,623 1.42 SR 991 S Dash Point 0 17 44 61 $687.500 $14,099 1.25 SR 99 / S 304th St 0 29 29 58 $942,500 $21,831 1.34 SR 99 / S 312th St 1 30 91 122 $2,070,000 $38,164 2.25 SR 991 S 31 Sin St 0 28 47 75 $1.005.000 $21.838 1.63 SR 991 S 320th St 0 56 93 149 $2,005,000 $23,162 1.72 SR 991 S 324th St 0 28 48 76 $1,010,000 $18,262 1.37 SR 991 S 336th St 0 30 34 64 $995,000 $17,133 1.10 SR 991 S 3481h St 0 34 103 137 $1,450.000 $22,620 2.14 SR 991 S 355th St 0 11 27 38 $437,500 $10,535 0.92 SR 161 / SR 18 0 49 87 136 $1,782,500 $20,208 1.54 S 272nd / IS SB Ramp 0 1 14 15 $97,500 $2,601 0.43 S 272nd / IS NB Ramp 0 5 7 12 $172,500 $5,972 0.42 S 272nd St / Military Rd 1 11 12 24 $1.152.600 $36,545 0.74 Military Rd S IS 288 St 1 28 53 82 $1,825.000 $62,874 2.38 Military Rd / S 304th St 0 10 14 24 $345,000 $14,279 0.99 Military Rd I S 320th 0 8 5 13 $245,000 $5,305 0.28 SW 320th St / 1 st Av S 0 2 5 7 $80,000 $1,378 0.12 S 3201h / 20th Ave S 0 18 51 69 $750.000 $14,055 1.29 S 3201h / 23rd Ave 0 18 70 88 $8451000 $11,684 1.22 S 320th / 25th Ave 0 9 31 40 $402,600 $5,949 0.59 S 320th I SB 1-5 Ramps 0 36 48 84 $1,230,000 $20.780 1.42 S 320th / NB 1-5 Ramps 0 2 15 17 $130,000 $3.096 0.40 S 320th / 32nd Ave 0 4 5 9 $135.000 $2,787 0.19 S 320th / Weyer. Way 0 6 14 20 $235,000 $5,884 0.50 S7312th St I28th Ave S 0 5 7 12 $172,500 $13,229 0.92 SW Campus / 1st Av SW 0 3 17 20 $167,500 $3,088 0.37 S 355 ST/SR 161 0 18 16 34 $575,000 $15,664 0.93 S 356 ST 121 Av SW 0 13 24 37 $477,500 $13,008 1.01 Hoyt Rd SW / SW 340 ST 0 9 22 31 $357,500 $16,646 1.44 SW 336th at 21 st Av SW 0 28 59 87 $1,065,000 $21,129 1.73 'Data obtained for the period of 2000 through 2002 Cost Per Fatality Collision: $790,000.00 from the City of Federal Way and WSDOT. Cost Per Injury Collision: $27,500.00 High Collision Rate Intersections are classified as those with a Collision Rate greater than 1.0 Cast Per PDO Collision: $5.000.00 C"rY OF Existing Intersection Collision Rate Summary Federal Way Federal Way City Center 91 Corridor Collision Rate Summary Intersection a Fatal 11injury K PDO Total Collisions Length Cost Severity Rate Collision Rate SR 991272nd SI 1 55 105 161 0.45 $2.827.500 $176,211 1003 SR 99116th Ave S (Old SR 5D9) 1 12 23 36 0.28 $1,235,000 $124.234 3.62 SR 99/ S 263r0 St 0 34 66 100 0.29 $1,265,1300 $124.949 9.86 S1t 991 S 288Ih St 0 65 131 196 053 $2,442.500 $119,004 9.62 SR 99 / S Dash Polnt(SR 509) 0 26 55 B1 0.14 $99D,000 $230,159 18.83 SR 99/ 18th Ave S 0 38 41 79 0.29 $1.250.000 $142.416 9100 SR 99 / S 304th St 0 50 6D 110 0.26 $1,676,000 $195.879 12.86 SR 99 IS 30M St 0 34 56 90 0-13 $1,215.000 $337.410 24.99 SR 99/ S 3101h St 1 47 126 174 012 $2,712.500 $776,448 4981 iSR 991 S 3121h SI 1 67 156 224 0.26 $3,412,50D $498,009 32.69 �SR 99 ! S 3161h St 0 102 161 263 0.25 $3,810.000 $521.760 38.01 SR 991 S 3201h St 0 88 149 237 024 $3,165,000 $559.320 41.88 SR 991 S 3241h St 0 57 110 167 0.38 $2,117.500 $102.471 14.39 SR 991 S 330th SI 1 35 56 92 0.21 $2.032,500 $342,811 15.52 SR 99 IS 333rd St/S 332nd St 1 58 68 127 0.16 $2,725.000 $586,401 27.33 SR 9915 3361h St 0 35 42 77 0.27 $1,172,500 $144,933 9.52 SR 991 S 16th Ave S Connector 0 5 28 33 0.04 $277.500 $225.458 26.01 SR 99 / S 16th Ave S 0 B 34 42 0.26 $390.000 $103.052 11.10 SR 991 S 344th St 0 41 115 156 0.28 $1.702,500 $423.977 38.85 SR 991 S 3411Ih S1 0 11 40 51 0.42 $602.500 $51,296 5.21 51199 15 3561h St CORRIDORTOTAL 2496 5.24 16.57 S 272nd / 161h Ave S D 38 102 140 0.18 $1.555.000 $721.978 6500 S 272nd St / SR 99 0 60 116 176 D22 $2.230,000 $500.304 39.49 S 272nd / Star Lake Rd 0 39 46 85 D.23 $1.302.500 $278.759 18.19 S 272nd 1261h Ave S 0 12 15 27 DA $405,000 $171,433 11.43 S 272nd 11.5 SB Ramp 0 4 25 29 0.16 $235,OOD $66.594 8.22 S 272nd11.5 NB Ramp 1 13 21 35 0.12 $1,252.500 $479,147 13.39 S-272nd St! Mllita2 Rd CORRIDOR TOTAL 492 1 24.30 Miltary Rd ! S 272nd St 2 22 27 51 0,48 $2,320,000 $267,178 5.87 Mlldary Rd / Star Lake 0 9 20 29 0.39 $347,500 $50,601 422 Military Rd / 284lh St 2 21 49 72 0.27 $2,402.500 $510,088 1529 Military Rd! 288th SI 1 28 59 69 0.64 $1.855,000 $186,148 883 Military Rd 12981h St 0 18 30 40 0.35 $645,000 $120,302 8.95 Military Rd IS 30411h S1 0 12 17 29 023 $415,000 $130,897 9.15 .Military Rd /31St Ave S 0 16 32 48 095 $600,000 $55,545 4.44 Military Rd / S 320th 0 11 31 42 0.62 $457.500 $98.679 9.05 Mllltary Rd / S 328th CORRIDOR TOTAL .107 3.63 7.20 I.% IntefSeGtlon a Fetal i tnlury M PDO TolaI Co!ItsIon s Lenl]lh Cpgl Soverhy Halo Co!il5lon R019 S 3201h St / SR 99 0 50 128 178 0.24 $2.015.000 $202.648 17.92 S 3201h / 201h Ave S 0 41 134 176 022 $1.797.500 $180.454 18.15 S 32011h / 23rd Ave 0 27 103 130 0.1 $1.257,500 $262.612 27.15 S 320th / 251h Ave 0 47 82 129 0.09 $1,702.600 $268.919 19.62 S 3201h / SB 1.5 Ramps 0 45 75 121 0.19 $1.640.000 $197,481 14,57 S 320th / NB F5 Ramps 0 e 21 27 0.15 $270,000 $54,288 5.43 .S 320th 132nd Ave 0 10 19 29 0.16 $370.000 $81,799 ISM S 3201h / Weyer. Way 0 17 31 46 0.25 $622,500 $86.453 8.67 5 320th / Military Rd CORRIDORTOTAL 637 1.4 14.06 S 3121h $I I SR 99 1 26 97 124 0.12 $1,990,000 $1,163,277 72.49 .53121hSI/181hAve S 0 11 36 49 0.13 $492,500 $345,741 34.40 :S 3121h St / 201h Ave S 0 7 17 24 013 $277.500 $164.634 14.23 ;S 3121h St 122nd Ave S 0 3 7 10 006 $117.500 $122.244 10.40 :S 3121h St / 23rd Ave S 0 a 14 22 0.31 $29D,ODD $103.988 7.89 $ 3121h $I I26th Ave $ CORRIDOR TOTAL 229 0.75 24.16 S 3041h St / SR 99 0 13 30 43 0.3 $507,500 $296,323 25.11 S 3041h St / 21sl St S 0 6 7 13 0.4 $2D0,000 $52.389 3.41 :5 304th St / 2Blh St S 0 14 1a 32 0.09 $475.000 $392.230 26.42 S 3041h St / MIJIM Rd CORRIDOR TOTAL 8B 0.79 11.64 .S 288th St / SR 99 0 30 84 114 0.08 51.245.000 S1,255,756 114.98 .S 288Ih $1 / 1 alh Ave S 0 13 42 55 0.15 $567,500 $306,365 29.69 'S 288th $1 / 201h Ave S 1 18 53 72 029 $1,550,000 $402,158 18.68 S 288Ih $t / b0lilarY Rd CORRIDOR TOTAL 241 0.52 36.56 :S 3481h St / 181h Ave S 0 109 223 332 0.21 $4,112,500 $459,437 37.09 :S Mitt St / SR 99 CORRIDOR TOTAL 332 0.21 37.09 ACCIdenl dale from the perold of 2000 through 2002. Obtained from the City of Federal Way and WSOOT COst Per Falwllty Ccl11 slog: 790000 Accklents per segment Include accidents occudng midblodc as well as at the upstream and downstream intersections. Cost Per Injury Collision: 27500 High Collision Rate Corridors are classified as those with a Collision Rate greater than 10.0 Cost Per PDO Collision: 6000 Collision Roles are shown for In W arterial In Ole Study area between the disignaled Inleranclions. rn•u+ � Fe deral Way Fadersl Way City Canter 93 Blank Appendix G. 2009 Forecasts Attached are the tables that detail the factors that calculate the 2009 forecasts. Information includes the PM peak hour volumes from the model (UFOSNET), AM and Saturday growth factors, and final post -processed values. Tables showing the Christian Faith Center volumes are included. Documents: 1. PM Peak hour post -processing tables 2. AM Peak hour post -processing tables 3. Saturday Peak hour post -processing tables 95 1-.qpna q UFOSNET 2009 PM PP Alt 1 INTID Location Northbound I Southbound Eaaldound Westbound L7 SH RT LT TN RT LT TH RT LS TN RT 52 S 272 St Pacific Hi S 165 629 489 262 1855 7 80 353 0 0 0 691 42 664 0 692 301 51 362 0 0 0 273 1364 190 208 73 104 546 187 279 808 41 977 390 392 2368 43 29 30 155 284 171 336 502 191 124 355 299 900 109 289 1647 347 260 408 60 215 0 0 178 317 351 0 291 508 315 157 528 202 123 682 229 833 187 354 1234 486 396 871 93 14B 431 434 189 72 85 1118 0 0 0 452 24 1004 0 1545 108 123 99 187 274 206 217 1177 209 1050 285 255 1450 70 76 234 214 539 120 268 670 159 275 569 19D 1252 70 162 1625 337 305 344 231 184 165 77 176 141 35 364 119 322 53 163 544 341 169 715 103 304 240 155 867 230 106 975 62 18 34 237 59 356 393 425 278 397 78 50 998 345 168 381 410 708 8 16 1140= 348 15 to account for new Southbound link leg. 2009 PM volumes correction 170 401 0 438 26 152 127 41 146 111 47 742 238 187 125 260 99 128 163 2 330 258 973 252 613 601 0 978 241 1432 546 24 294 497 247 539 0 0 344 1179 363 1083 324 1484 154 1383 219 960 403 249 299 971 154 392 282 691 266 1506 344 1383 136 789 170 607 16 26 48 0 619 99 226 139 205 0 170 266 183 0 103 80 271 162 80 180 103 261 33 15 57 .& S 272 St & 1.5 SS Ramps 59 S 272 SE & 1.5 N8 Pamps 60 S 272 St & M VM Rd S 1060 S 288 St Pacift Hwy S ION S 288 St & M Oln Rd S 2550 S 312 St& Pacific Hwy S 2557 S 3t2 51 & 28 Av S 3040 SW 320 St8i 1 Av S 3060 S 320 S18 Padfic Hwy S 3055 S 320 81 & 23 Av S 3061 S 320 SI & 1-5 SE .320 Ram 3094 S 320 St& Military Rd S 3350 S 324 SS& Padfic N S 4028 SW 336th Si & 21s1Av SW 4050 S 336 5t 8 Pacific 1fYr S 471FSW34ClthSt&Hp11Rd SW 4840 SW Cam us Or & 1 Av S 4846 5 348th St 8 Pacific S 5228 SW $56 St & 2151 Av SW 5216 5 3St& Padfc 11S 5251 556 368 5l & En&ar.!ad P S NO Adjusted S 356 SI and Enchanted Pkwy ### Manually adjusted to account for south intersection UFOSNET 2009 PM PP Alt 2 0 0 0 701 44 655 0 685 406 656 610 0 309 51 375 0 0 0 264 1375 0 0 1022 628 194 215 67 105 558 210 311 799 438 223 1457 102 41 976 389 392 2352 43 30 31 26 546 24 228 153 294 171 332 497 186 123 351 150 298 493 140 300 896 110 291 1629 347 259 411 126 247 545 206 50 214 0 0 177 315 352 0 41 0 0 0 292 508 313 155 518 201 123 683 145 341 1183 169 229 829 185 352 1221 487 397 B69 111 360 1086 268 93 147 428 430 181 72 84 1107 45 311 1492 181 0 0 0 459 25 1009 0 1536 738 155 1359 0 109 123 99 185 274 206 218 1184 241 220 966 182 207 1052 288 255 1433 69 76 235 186 398 243 79 214 539 120 272 675 161 276 669 124 295 969 271 191 1249 68 159 1607 339 308 340 260 152 393 161 230 185 185 77 176 141 35 365 99 281 690 81 117 320 52 160 541 339 172 7116 128 255 1497 180 95 301 249 169 664 223 102 994 141 354 1380 110 62 18 34 234 59 363 399 419 2 136 792 263 282 393 75 49 984 356 171 374 327 161 601 32 408 716 8 16 115200 338 15 259 17 25 15 Adjusted S 356 St and Enchanted Pkwy to account for new Southbound link #rr# Manually adjusted to account for south intersection leg. 2009 PM volumes correction UFOSNET 2009 PM PP Alt 3 - No Action Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT 154 0 301 198 41 155 299 59 294 228 93 0 108 209 214 190 230 119 90 62 267 TH 820 0 50 199 970 281 897 219 5D3 830 151 0 122 1053 540 1252 185 322 299 18 400 RT 469 0 361 70 392 171 110 0 319 1B6 424 0 98 283 120 70 184 52 246 34 83 LT 271 700 0 106 395 335 292 0 153 354 439 469 104 256 271 162 77 159 166 234 55 TH RT LT TH 1$77 8 80 356 44 662 0 691 0 0 270 1373 560 209 281 810 2373 44 29 31 601 190 124 359 1653 346 258 410 176 320 $50 0 518 196 120 683 1239 464 396 673 186 75 88 1115 26 1031 0 1525 275 204 216 1180 1457 71 77 233 670 160 276 668 1621 336 302 341 176 141 35 365 541 337 171 713 893 206 100 969 59 370 424 414 1067 337 156 374 R7 188 406 0 441 26 153 127 38 147 112 45 763 243 187 126 257 99 128 147 2 319 LT 7H 971 255 B36 603 0 1002 221 1428 557 25 293 493 250 541 0 0 351 1186 367 1086 314 1509 161 1355 225 973 391 242 291 966 153 391 279 689 257 1502 400 1399 136 782 185 604 RT 49 0 620 90 229 137 206 0 167 270 189 0 183 77 272 162 81 1-19 118 262 34 t 3 Pacific H S Si & I.$ So Rams 51 & 1.5 NB St& M1111Rd S 518 Psorrc M S Sl & MMIWa Rd S SI8 Pacific tLAY S S1 & 28 Av 5 13 St & 1 AV S Sib Pacific Hwy S S1& 23 Av S St & 1-5 S9 - 320 ftmp St& Wi Rd S 5t& PediG S 6th $I & 21st Av SW St Paci#c H S OW SI & Ho Rd SW Pmpu3 Or & 1 Av S h SE & Padfic LIM S 5 St 9 21st Av SW 51& Paclft Kwv S St& Enchanted Pkwy S 419 720 9 15 116900 332 16 277 18 25 15 WO Adjusted S 356 St and Enchanted Pkwy to account for new Southbound link A## Manually adjusted to account for south intersection leg. 2009 PM volumes correction 97 Christian Faith Center PM Additional Volumes INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 51 4 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2 31 2 1 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 61 35 5 34 30551 S 320 St & 23 Av S 1 -24 2 35 1 -25 34 30571 S 320 St & 1-5 SB Ramp 13 81 1 11 30581 S 320 St & 1-5 NB Ramp 13 111 17 3061 S 320 St & Weyerhaeuser Wy S 17 9 13 7 3064 S 320 St & Milita Rd S g 7 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 3 41 -50 88 2 3640 SW 330th St & 1 Av S 31 61 5 2 4028 SW 336th St & 21 st Av SW 2 2 2 3 31 3 40431 S 336 St & 1 Wy S 2 71 1 3 g 40501 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 9 34 -30 71 78 13 -21 8 75 4132 10 Av SW & SW Campus Dr 12 9 4150 SR 99 & 16 Av S Connector 21 4250 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 21 57 28 4251 16 Av S & 16 Av S Connector 28 4840 SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S I I 1 1 13 22 4848 S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S 12 3 16 221 16 2 4850 S 348th St & 16 Av S 9 12 12 9 5228 SW 356 St & 21 st Av SW 1 4 5 2 5246 S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S 7 9 6 5 5251 S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S 5 8 2009 PM AIM volumes with CFC INTID Location t[antbound Solit"ound Els07mind Woslbouad LT TX RT LT T RT LT H Tli RT 2 27251E ac-fi[ 5 15 076 4B9 262 7 2 60 353 170 —M 282 46 57 S 272 SF A 1.5 58 StanyA 0 0 0 "1 42 664 0 M 401 673 W1 9 59 S 272 St A 1-5 NS Rames 301 $1 362 0 0 0 273 W, 0 0 978 619 80 S 272 SF 8 htP Rd 5 190 206 73 104 546 767 279 41 1432 99 1050 S 2776 Sl A Popfc H S 47 DY7 390 392 4 29 3Q 2S 54 24 228 1 S 26657 E Fmk RE S T55 284 171 3]8 502 191 124 355 152 497 139 2650 S 312 Sl E PaOfic MWY S 299 945 I179 2 9 1 l 347 280 408 127 247 539 205 2867 3312SIA28AvS SD 216 Q a 178 377 35T 0 41 0 0 0 3040 SW 320 St A 1 Av S 293 511 315 1671 530 $23 on 147 344 1170 110 3050 S 320 sf E Padbc S 229 a39 222 OU 7239 486 B 11 397 1083 268 3055 5 320 tE 23Av 5 93 146 4117 434 191 72 85 1163 47 2n 15le 103 3057 S 320 S181-5 SB - MCI RaMp 0 0 0 456 24 1012 0 10, 742 154 13fi3 9 9064 SSA Milila Rd5 106 123 99 18T 274 20S 2t7 11 238 239 967 1B3 S 074 5i P tG S 212 f 09 2 205 1539 70 6 234 1 403 249 80 4028 SW 3781I5 StE 2fal Au W 214 539 122 270 579 159 05 571 125 302 974 74 4050 S 336 51 E 199 1286 40 233 T703 337 305 7 M 733 40Q 421 SW 540lb 37A Rd SW 231 184 785 77 176 141 35 VA 282 G91 80 0 SW Ca iDrE 1 ArS 175 322 63 7 4 y11 t69 728 728 2W 1528 1W 4648 S 348m S1 M H 103 3145 40 1 883 2A2 172 975 153 ]44 1383 1p5 5228 SW 35SSt E 21a1 AV 82 76 3+ 238 59 356 3113 429 2 7 794 2B3 sm. S 316 S A PAIJIG 1114Y r I 278 4041 18 6Q 1007 351 1T3 361 :13al 1701 6Q7 33 2fi7 3 I ocrmtoa S 1 4101 F131 8 16 ! N8 01 3*19 151 2581 TKI 261 15 2009 PM Alt-2 volumes with CFC INTID Location Nommound swhtyundi ial and Wfattwund LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TM RT LT TH RT 52 272 St A P4c8c 1 5 7 625 484 266 1671 87YA 170 0 25 49 ST 327257E 1.5 5E am s 0 0 0 7 44 655 Q 665 406 656 5111 0 611 S272 SiE I•SN 309 Sl 375 Q 0 0 13 0 0 1022 626 60 UMEAMPM m S 79d 215 67 105 553 210 317 7 438 223 1457 102 1060 $ 20$t A Pacilk MW S 41 97 3S2 2362 43 " 31 26 546 24 226 S 288 SI A Mililary Rd S 153 2154 111 332 A97 186 7 1 I 493 ld _LOW 25W S 31 —St E Paple MW 5 901 71 291 1633 347 269 411 126 247 545 206 2557 S 312 SI A 20 AV 5 do 214 0 a 1" 315 M. 0 41 0 0 0 204Q SW 320 Si 8 1 AV S 2sd 5T 1 313 1 52Q 201 123 583 1401 341 1183 189 3050 S 320 SI A Pacific Hwy S 229 "S 220 352 122E 487 397 569 111 394 1088 266 W55 532051E 23 Ay 1d7 404 430 IM 72 84 7142 45 286 IM 18t 3M57 S 3" S1 A 1-5 SO - 320 IU 0 6 0 472 25 1017 0 1547 738 155 lass a 3054 5 320 51 E wl- Rd S 1 s 3 a9 185 274 208 218 1193 741 220 973 $92 33W S 324 S1 E PWft HV 5 70 7 ] 2M 205 1521 W T6 23S 168 398 243 79 4026 SW3381ASl999SW 214 639 122 ■ 67 161 278 571 T24 299 972 274 W50 S 33B SSE PadBc S 200 120 38 1585 339 906 353 2 137 40t 275 4218 SW 34M IAH Rd5W 230 18 785 77 176 1-05 39 386 98 85 690 81 4 0 W Cam a r 8 S Av S 117 62 f S47 M 12 729 128 7 1 18 4648 3d Btn 518 acdrk H 95 T 313 7d9 172 M 2+5 list 984 141 l3B0 112 522E SW 35651821 ai Av sw a 76 r 23 5Q MIN Ml 4 2 135 797 255 5245 S 3 51 E Pap is S 202 400 75 49 M1 1021 778 374 3271 I FAt 32 5251 S 356 St A EnchaMW P S 408 721 8 16 1150 0 Ma 15 259 17 26 15 2009 PM Alt-3 volumes with CFC INTID Location nnbound Sauthbou Eaa76nund W.altround tI I Tit I RT LT TIf I RT L7 I TX I RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 S1 A PiCdiC S 154 4 7 1 1 7 6 SB 158 977 2 49 2 2 Si A I-5 B R s 0 0 D 700 44 %2 0 691 406 ou 59 S 272 S7 A I.5 NS Ranvo 301 f5ci 363 0 0 0 270 1373 0 0 ion 620 80 S 272 St A wawy Rd S IN 1991 70 l96 560 20.9 281 BIO 441 727 1428 1050 3 2B6 3t A Peak MW S 41 970 M 395 2373 44 20 31 26 557 25 220 1956 5 288 Sf A halilmy Rd S 155 281 171 335 607 790 124 359 163 293 493 737 2 S 3l SSE pac6c S 2B9 902 110 292 1657 34E 258 41 127 250 5411 20 2557 S312Si828ArS 59 219 4 0K32011 an 350 0 38 0 0 0 3040 SW320S181 AvS 298 we 3f 1531W T20 fib 148 M 71A6 161 X% S b S 226 AT 221 MA 404 396 873 112 401 108E 270 3056 $ 3WSt623AvS 93 151 439 7s 08 11 45 289 1$43 1e9 3057 S 320 SIA -5Se- 20R 0 482 1 0 359E783 161 i365 0 MiGW RO $ 7 12t 9a 181 704 ITe 118A 243 :25 9R0 797 $ 324 StE PaPM1c S 212 2a5 71 77 27318 391 242 77 402E 338m S! E 21at AV 5W 214 54 122 27 160 76 S7Q 12fi 300 9% 275 4 S336SlE adfrc H S 199 1 40 233 354 267 132 4216 Ih 1 230 1e11 394 77 141 35 365 99 229 869 $1 4840 SW Csm ua Or 8 1 AV S 110 322 SZ 159 Sal 337 171 720 120 257 1624 179 4646 S 348731 SI A apfiC 5 ail 240 10 NA 228 116 M147 4(q lass 320 5726 SW 35SSIE21tt ArSW 62 16 34 235 379 474 419 2 1. Ta7 284 5246 3 356 sta M-c S 267 407 83 55 107 W3 160 3741 31lll IR51 804 34 5251 S3%51aE sledP S 419 725 9 75 116 332 18 277 78 75 • • 2004 AM Adjusted Counts Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 100 1156 551 167 322 50 153 264 26 193 211 147 57 S 272 St & I-5 SB Ramps 176 7 207 1097 234 228 384 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 174 10 370 595 631 377 788 601 S 272 St & Military Rd S 476 578 1591 54 120 78 394 584 1091 109 681 110 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 138 521 3891 207 813 145 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 194 527 338 80 246 153 334 709 114 88 233 23 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 52 380 242 105 334 61 241 1006 204 123 247 67 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 190 8 599 1350 444 183 946 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy--S 351 584 69 51 306 190 100 335 169 55 327 61 421-81 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 1 651 981 1691 60J 157 91 75 5631 1741 75 1421 51 2OO9AM background Growth Factors Syn INTID Location Northbound I Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.70X6 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7 7% 7 7% 7 7% 7.7% 7.7% 7 7% 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% Annual growth rate = 1.5% from: am 98 VOLUME.As (12-30-05 by Rick Perez) 5-year growth rate = (1+1.5%)"5-1 = 7.7% 2004-2009 AM Counts x background Growth Factors Syn INTID Location Northbound J Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT I TH I RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH I RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1081 1245 594 180 347 54 1651 284 28 208 227 158 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 0 0 0 190 8 223 0 1182 252 246 414 0 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 187 11 399 0 0 0 641 680 0 0 406 849 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 513 623 171 58 129 84 424 629 117 117 734 119 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 149 561 0 01 419 2231 876 01 156 0 0 0 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 209 568 364 861 265 165 360 764 123 95 251 25 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 56 409 261 113 360 66 260 1084 220 133 266 72 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 0 205 9 645 0 1454 478 197 1019 0 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 378 629 74 55 330 205 108 361 182 59 352 66 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 70 106 182 65 169 10 81 607 187 81 153 55 2004-2009 to 2014 counts -id 1-5-06 v11.xls 2004-AM-Base 100 1/5/2006 Christian Faith Center AM Additional Volumes INTID Location Northbound Southbound I Eastbound Westbound LTI TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 18 35 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 9 641 17 1 1 122 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB Ramp 35 122 64 3058 S 320 St & 1-5 NB Ramp 35 64 18 3061 S 320 St & Weyerhaeuser Wy S 27 52 3064 S 320 St & Military Rd S 27 52 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 9 181 35 17 3640 SW 330th St & 1 Av S 9 18 35 17 4028 SW 336th St & 21 st Av SW 171 17 17 91 9 9 4043 S 336 St & 1 Wy S 17 52 9 27 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 27 52 96 23 27 4132 10 Av SW & SW Campus Dr 36 70 4150 SR 99 & 16 Av S Connector 157 4250 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 157 1 1 82 4251 16 Av S & 16 Av S Connector 82 4840 SW Cam us Dr & 1 Av S 96 64 4848 S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S 87 9 46 64 122 17 4850 S 348th St & 16 Av S 70 36 36 70 5228 SW 356 St & 21 st Av SW 52461 S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S 521 27 18 35 52511 S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S 1 1 351 1 1 23 101 2009 AM City Center Growth - AIt1 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 19 3 1 29 1 12 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 12 4 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 4 4 2 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 2 1 1 4 4 4 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 4 23 41 76 7 1 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 9 501 3 6 37 16 11 1 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2 291 1 1 107 1 30571 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 29 69 12 119 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 74 I 1 21 381 151 28 1 81 3 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW I I 1 1 361 1 1 6 2009 AM City Center Growth - AIt2 Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 27 4 2 25 2 12 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 12 8 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 5 8 5 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 5 1 7 6 4 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 4 35 41 72 1 61 11 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 8 511 2 5 351 1 16 101 1 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2 28 1 1031 1 1 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 25 90 17 108 40501 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 72 3 41 18 30 6 3 42181 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 1 36 6 2009 AM City Center Growth - AIt3 Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 4 1 4 1 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 1 1 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 1 1 1 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 1 1 1 1 1 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 51 11 10 11 1 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 2 191 1 1 7 4 2 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 7 18 11 2 7 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 3 17 2 19 40501 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 13 1 10 3 6 1 1 42181 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 14 2 102 2009 AM PP Aid Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 108 1264 597 181 376 54 165 285 28 220 227 158 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 0 0 0 190 8 235 0 1186 252 246 414 0 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 187 11 403 0 0 0 641 684 0 0 406 851 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 515 624 171 58 130 84 428 633 117 121 734 119 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 153 584 4 0 495 223 876 0 163 0 0 1 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 209 5771 414 89 265 165 366 801 123 111 262 26 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 56 411 290 114 360 66 261 1191 220 133 267 72 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 0 240 9 796 0 1587 490 197 1138 0 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 405 703 74 109 368 220 136 457 190 62 375 93 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 70 106 182 65 169 10 81 643 187 81 159 55 2009 AM PP AIt2 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 108 1272 598 182 372 54 165 286 28 220 227 158 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 0 0 0 190 8 235 0 1190 252 246 414 0 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 187 11 404 0 0 0 641 688 0 0 406 854 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 518 623 171 58 130 84 431 635 117 121 734 119 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 153 596 4 0 491 223 876 0 1621 0 0 1 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 209 5761 415 881 265 1651 365 799 123 111 261 26 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 56 411 289 113 360 66 261 1187 220 133 267 72 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 0 240 9 792 0 1608 495 197 1127 0 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 405 701 74 110 371 223 138 457 188 62 375 93 4218 :S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 70 106 182 65 169 10 81 643 187 81 159 55 2009 AM PP AIt3 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 108 1249 595 180 351 54 165 284 28 208 227 159 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 0 0 0 190 8 224 0 1183 252 246 414 0 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 187 11 400 0 0 0 641 681 0 0 406 850 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 514 623 171 58 129 84 424 630 117 118 734 119 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 149 566 1 0 429 223 876 0 157 0 0 0 3028 SW 320 St & 21stAv SW 209 570 383 871 265 1651 361 771 123 99 2531 25 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 56 4091 268 113 360 66 260 1102 231 135 273 72 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 0 240 9 770 0 1536 480 197 1038 0 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 405 6421 74 108 340 208 114 457 183 59 375 94 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 70 1061 182 65 169 10 81 6211 187 81 155 55 103 2004 SAT Adjusted Counts Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific HM S 193 716 440 310 981 57 107 364 107 367 317 110 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 292 9 353 811 270 148 403 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 152 13 135 452 600 358 393 60 S 272nd St & Military Rd S 284 176 72 67 200 109 82 491 202 88 509 73 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 2361 981 112 2131 945 143 225 358 107 205 4721 135 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 2461 1060 310 1541 1096 48 111 144 232 239 119 138 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 1701 449 439 136 317 58 110 1020 108 360 970 124 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 211 723 184 330 850 413 589 1055 54 454 945 268 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 206 156 151 316 236 286 500 1215 131 366 1292 356 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 50 156 317 435 148 135 179 1486 671 469 18621 349 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 1 126 3 730 1838 623 149 1487 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp 594 21 1021 1 1065 903 1025 113 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 218 894 256 223 1036 113 1211 161 125 249 227 A734218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 108 90 180 89 122 7$72 508 125 188 343 2009 SAT background Growth Factors Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT I TH RT I LT I TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6%1 5.6% 5.6%15.6%1 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 60 S 272nd St & Military Rd S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6%,5.6%1 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.67A 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramo 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hw S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% Annual growth rate = 1.1 % from: sat 98 VOLUME.dat (12-30-05 by Rick Perez) 5-year growth rate = (1+1.1 %)^5-1 = 5.6% 2004 SAT Counts x background Growth Factors Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific Hwv S 204 756 465 3271 1036 60 113 384 113 388 335 116 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 0 0 0 308 10 373 0 857 285 156 426 0 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 161 14 143 0 0 0 477 634 0 0 378 415 60 S 272nd St & Military Rd S 300 186 76 71 211 115 87 519 213 93 538 77 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 249 1036 118 225 998 151 238 378 1131 217 499 143 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 260 1120 327 163 1158 51 117 152 245 252 126 146 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 180 474 464 144 335 61 116 1077 114 380 1025 131 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 223 764 194 3491 898 436 622 1114 57 480 998 283 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 218 165 159 3341 249 302 528 1283 138 387 1365 376 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 53 165 335 459 156 143 189 1570 71 495 1967 369 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 01 0 0 133 3 7711 0 1941 658 157 1571 0 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp 627 21 108 0 0 0 01 1125 9541 0 1083 119 3350 S 324 St & Pacific HwyS 230 944 270 236 1094 119 128 170 132 263 240 77 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 114 95 990 94 129 82 76 537 132 199 362 74 2004-2009 to 2014 counts-jd 1-5-06 v11.xls 104 1/5/2006 2009 SAT Growth AM Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 521 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 42 66 11 29 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 29 1 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 9 2 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 2 2 2 2 7 21 5 1 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 15 65 181 101 153 54 46 71 181 40 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 1 278 551 99 195 22 43 30401 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 72 211 306 20 78 6 30501 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 165 81 108 71 48 167 289 29 80 84 30521 S 320 St & 20 Av S 96 44 100 6 47 40 114 85 265 160 58 8 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 8 1 26 1 11 9 229 3 388 36 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ram 78 203 35 319 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ram 124 80 319 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 223 123 3 81 8 8 6 60 6 7 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 85 15 2009 SAT Growth AIt2 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 53 61 29 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 29 1 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 10 3 601 S 272 St & Military Rd S 1 2 5 2 1 6 41 5 2 25501 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 16 85 167 88 153 481 461 63 161 37 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 1 309 64 86 207 24 41 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 68 181 291 19 74 5 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 182 81 112 91 52 172 258 33 72 86 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 91 41 106 8 42 38 102 98 228 118 62 12 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 8 2 42 1 71 5 302 4 341 35 30571 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 67 283 48 289 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp 146 137 289 3350 S 324 St & Pacific HwyS 238 109 3 101 11 9 6 59 6 7 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW I I 1 84 14 2009 SAT Growth AIt3 Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 10 9 2 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 2 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 2 1 60 S 272 St & Militapt Rd S 1 1 2 1 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 3 17 30 13 311 1 9 11 13 31 7 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 61 9 19 41 3 9 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 19 5 86 4 17 1 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 31 24 21 17 9 39 83 10 19 16 30521 S 320 St & 20 Av S 21 7 25 41 7 9 25 28 611 26 12 6 30551 S 320 St & 23 Av S 31 1 111 11 1 54 1 1 64 7 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 9 55 6 57 3058 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 2 31 24 56 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 5032 1 23 2 2 2 19 2 2 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 1 1 35 5 105 2009 SAT PP AM Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 204 798 465 327 1102 60 113 384 113 411 335 116 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 0 308 10 402 0 857 286 156 426 0 59 5 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 161 14 152 0 0 0 477 634 0 0 378 417 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 302 188 78 71 213 115 87 526 215 98 539 77 2550 5 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 264 1101 299 326 1151 151 238 432 159 288 517 183 2750 S 316 St& Pacific Hwy S 2601 1398 382 262 1353 511 117 152 245 274 126 189 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 1801 474 5361 165 335 61 116 13831 114 4001 1103 137 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 2231 929 275 457 969 484 789 1403 57 5091 1078 367 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 314 209 259 340 296 342 642 1368 403 547 1423 384 3055 S 320 St& 23 Av S 61 166 335 485 157 154 198 1799 74 495 2355 405 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 0 133 3 849 0 2144 693 157 1890 0 3058 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 627 2 108 0 0 0 0 1249 1034 0 1402 119 3350 ;5 324 St & Pacific HwyS 230 1167 393 239 1175 127 136 176 132 323 246 84 45151 218 SW 340[h St & Hoyt Rd SW 114 95 190 94 1291 821 761 622 132 199 377 74 2009 SAT PP AIt2 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 2041 809 465 327 1097 60 113 384 113 417 335 116 57 S 272 St & I-5 SB Ramps 0 0 0 308 10 402 0 857 286 156 426 0 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 161 14 153 0 0 0 477 634 0 0 378 418 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 301 188 81 71 213 115 87 525 217 98 540 77 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 265 1121 285 313 1151 151 238 426 159 280 515 180 27501 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 260 1429 391 249 1365 51 117 152 2451 276 126 187 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 180 474 532 162 335 61 116 1368 114 399 1099 136 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 223 946 2751 461 989 488 794 1372 57 513 1070 369 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 3091 206 265 342 291 340 630 1381 366 505 1427 388 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 61 167 335 501 157 150 194 1872 75 495 2308 404 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 0 133 3 B38 0 2224 706 157 1860 0 3058 S 320 St & 320 - I-5 NB Ramp 627 2 108 0 0 0 0 1271 1091 0 1372 119 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 230 1162 379 239 1195 130 137 176 132 322 246 84 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 114 95 190 94 12B 82 76 621 1321 199 376 74 2009 SAT PP AIt3 Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 204 766 465 327 1045 60 113 384 113 390 335 116 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 0 308 10 375 0 857 285 156 426 0 59 S 272 St & 1.5 NB Rams 161 14 145 0 0 0 477 634 0 0 378 416 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 301 186 77 71 211 115 87 521 213 94 538 77 2550 S 312 St & Pacific H S 252 1053 148 238 1029 151 238 387 124 230 502 150 2750 S 316 St &Pacific Hw S 260 1181 336 182 1199 51 117 152 245 255 126 155 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 1801 474 4831 149 335 61 1161 1163 1141 384 1042 132 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 223 795 218 370 915 445 661 1197 57 490 1017 299 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 239 1 22 184 338 256 311 553 1311 199 413 1377 382 3055 S 320 St& 23 Av S 56 166 335 470 156 144 190 1624 72 495 2031 376 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ram 0 0 0 133 3 780 0 1996 664 157 1628 0 3058 5 320 St & 320 - 1.5 NB Ramp 629 2 108 0 0 0 0 1156 978 0 1139 119 3350 S 324 St & pacific HwyS 230 994 302 237 1117 121 130 172 132 282 242 79 4218 SW 340th St & Ho Rd SW 114 95 190 94 129 82 76 572 132 199 367 74 106 i -� Appendix H. 2009 Baseline Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 3 (No Action) Attached are the 2009 intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for Alternative 3 intersections. Analysis of the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours used the Synchro 6.0 (Build 612) analysis software to report the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) intersection operations. Where intersections exceeded the City's Level of Service threshold of LOS E or a volume -to -capacity ratio of less than 1.0, results were exported from Synchro to the Highway Capacity Software (version 4.1f). Documents: 4. 2009 PM Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline 5. 2009 AM Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline 6. 2009 Saturday Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline .J 107 Blank 1: Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas drisdiction Analysis dar 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 NO Action Project ID Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Numbr of lanes, N l 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 2 3 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 80 356 168 971 255 49 154 820 489 271 1877 8 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 0.893 0.893 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 47 10 0 16 10 0 89 10 0 1 Lane width 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 Parking / We / Parking N 1 N N 3 N N -2 N N 2 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 2 6 0 0 2 2 6 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 1 3.3 3.3 Phasing Thru & RT Excl. Left 03 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 Timing G 20.0 G 26.0 G I't- G 10.9 G 43.1 G G 110 )6 5 10 5 )-1 5 'iE 5 `l-I Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Deiay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow rate, v 80 477 971 288 154 1220 271 1884 Lane group capacity, c 379 542 707 558 305 1683 308 1729 v/c ratio, X 0.21 0.88 1.37 0.52 0.50 0.72 0.88 1.09 Total green ratio, g/C 0.22 10.17 0.22 0.17 0.09 0.36 0.09 0.36 Uniform delay, d, 38.6 48.8 147.0 45.6 52.0 33.3 53.9 38.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calitation, k 0.04 0.39 0.50 0.05 0.04 0.50 0.39 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 0.1 14.9 176.0 0.3 0.5 2.8 23.3 50.5 Initial qeue delay, d 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 38.7 63.7 .223.0 45.9 52.5 36.1 77.2 88.9 Lane group LOS D E F D D D E F Approach delay 60.1 182.5 37.9 87.4 Approach LOS E F D F Intersection delay 94.3 X, = 1.10 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright 02000 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 109 ,� file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k32E.tmp 2/15/2006 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection Ramp St & 1-5 SB - 272 Area Type All other areas drisdiction Analysis bfar 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action Project ID Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Numhr of lanes, N 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Lane group TR L T L LT R Volume, V (vph) 691 406 636 603 700 44 662 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) P P A P A A A Start-up lost time, Il 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, I 1.1.000 0.497 0.497 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 71 0 10 0 33 Lane width 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / ade / Parking N 1 N N 3 N N N N -1 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 5 0 4 3 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.2 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing 22.0 (331.2 G 17.0 (a[; 28.8 G� '1& 6 )& 5 10 5 `A 'A 5 � v- Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 _ C cle Lencilh, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted flow rate, v 1026 636 603 357 387 629 Lane group capacity, c 1595 257 1545 408 416 732 v/c ratio, X 0.64 2.47 0.39 0.88 0.93 0.86 Total green ratio, g/C 0.49 1 0.14 0.44 0.24 0.24 0.47 Uniform delay, di 22.6 51.5 22.5 43.9 44.6 28.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.845 1.000 1.000 11.000 Delay calitation, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.38 0.44 0.37 Incremental delay, d2 2.0 .669.4 0.4 18.0 27.0 9.7 Initial qeue delay, d 3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 24.6 720.9 19.4 61.9 71.7 37.7 Lane group LOS C F B E E D Approach delay 24.6 379.5 53.6 Approach LOS C F D Intersection delay 156.4 Xc = 1.02 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright 02000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 110 file://C:\Documents%20afid%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k33F.tmp 2/15/2006 59: S 272 St & 272 - 1-5 NB Ramp HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W.BR NB,L NBT NRR SBL, SBT -,SBR Lane Configurations ►j ++ tt r 4 e Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1 % -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1473 1878 1604 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1710 3272 3428 1473 1878 1604 Volume (vph) 270 1373 0 0 1002 620 301 50 361 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 270 1373 0 0 1002 620 301 50 361 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 138 0 0 34 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 270 1373 0 0 1002 482 0 351 327 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 35.9 19.9 19.9 14.1 14.1 Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 35.9 19.9 19.9 14.1 14.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.60 0.33 0.33 0.24 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 314 1958 1137 489 441 377 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.42 0.29 0.19 v/s Ratio Perm c0.33 c0.20 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.70 0.88 0.98 0.80 0.87 Uniform Delay, d1 23.8 8.3 18.9 19.9 21.6 22.1 Progression Factor 1.12 1.00 1.42 2.15 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.7 1.5 1.0 9.2 9.0 18.0 Delay (s) 41.4 9.9 28.0 52.1 30.6 40.1 Level of Service D A C D C D Approach Delay (s) 15.1 37.2 35.4 0.0 Approach LOS B D D A In tersection'Summa HCM Average Control Delay 27.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 3 111 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 02/24/2004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Pro ect ID S 272 St & Military Rd S All other areas 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Nt 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L T R L TR L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 281 810 441 221 1428 90 198 199 70 106 560 209 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, II 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 10.668 0.668 0.668 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 Initial unmet demand, Q. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 102 10 0 3 10 0 47 10 0 131 Lane width 12.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -3 N N 0 N N 0 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 3 0 0 4 4 2 1 3 3 1 0 1 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing Thru & RT WB Only Excl. Left 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 Timing G= 29.2 G= 7.0 G= 10.0 G= IY= G= 9.7 G= 39.1 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length. C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 281 810 339 221 1515 198 199 23 106 560 78 Lane group capacity, c 146 825 501 325 1157 142 588 493 143 596 511 v/c ratio, X 1.92 0.98 0.68 0.68 1.31 1.39 0.34 0.05 0.74 a94 0.15 Total green ratio, g/C 0.06 0.24 10.32 0.18 0.34 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.08 0.33 0.33 Uniform delay, d1 55.0 45.1 35.1 45-7 39.4 55.2 30.6 27.7 53.9 39.3 26.7 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.966 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k a50 0.50 0.20 0.21 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.26 0.44 0.04 Incremental delay, d2 •432.6 21.6 2.0 4.7 145.5 214.5 0.1 0.0 16.5 22.7 1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay •487.6 66.7 L 50.4 184.9 269.7 30.8 27.7 70.5 62.0 28.7 Lane group LOS F E D F F C C E E C Approach delay 142.1 167.8 1 143.2 59.8 Approach LOS F F F E Intersection delay 138.4 X� = 1.24 Intersection LOS F HCS2006TM Copyright 02000 University or Florida, All Rights Reserved version U f 112 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k350.tmp 2/15/2006 H 1 1050: S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S:BL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4, M T f+T )) +0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 15 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1815 3545 1588 1805 4905 3432 5024 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1815 3545 1588 1805 4905 3432 5024 Volume (vph) 29 31 26 557 25 229 41 970 392 395 2373 44 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 29 31 26 557 25 229 41 970 392 395 2373 44 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 183 0 0 61 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 71 0 557 71 0 41 1301 0 395 2416 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockades (#/hr) 2 0 6 6 0 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 21.9 21.9 1.5 37.3 23.8 59.6 Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 23.9 23.9 3.0 38.8 25.3 61.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.32 0.21 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 182 706 316 45 1586 724 2558 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.16 0.04 0.02 c0.27 0.12 c0.48 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.39 0.79 0.22 0.91 0.82 0.55 0.94 Uniform Delay, d1 50.6 45.7 40.3 58.4 37.4 42.2 27.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.76 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 5.4 0.1 96.6 4.7 0.5 8.8 Delay (s) 51.1 51.1 40.4 146.2 33.1 42.7 36.7 Level of Service D D D F C D D Approach Delay (s) 51.1 47.7 36.4 37.5 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection Summary. HCM Average Control Delay 39.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 5 1056: S 288 St & Military Rd S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NB,R SBL SBT, SBR Lane Configurations I #T. +T + r + r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1817 3328 3328 3191 1760 1777 1524 1799 1846 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.48 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1817 3328 3328 3191 889 1777 1524 438 1846 1583 Volume (vph) 124 359 153 293 493 137 155 281 171 335 501 190 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 124 359 153 293 493 137 155 281 171 335 501 190 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 39 0 0 20 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 124 473 0 293 610 0 155 281 48 335 501 190 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.2 18.5 11.0 22.3 21.0 21.0 21.0 28.5 28.5 28.5 Effective Green, g (s) 7.2 18.5 11.0 22.3 21.5 21.5 21.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.22 0.13 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2,0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 744 443 860 275 462 396 346 647 555 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.14 c0.09 c0.19 0.03 c0.16 c0.14 0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.03 c0.20 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.64 0.66 0.71 0.56 0.61 0.12 0.97 0.77 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 37.0 29.1 34.1 27.3 27.4 26.9 23.4 23.0 23.9 19.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 20.6 1.3 2.9 2.2 1.6 1.6 0.1 39.3 5.3 0.1 Delay (s) 57.6 30.4 36.9 29.5 29.0 28.5 23.4 62.2 29.2 19.9 Level of Service E C D C C C C E C B Approach Delay (s) 35.7 31.8 27.2 38.3 Approach LOS D C C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 82.7 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 6 114 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC V12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 Pm Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S All other areas BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Acctiotio n Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 258 410 127 250 541 206 299 902 110 292 1657 346 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.936 0.936 1.000 1.000 0.795 0.795 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Fed / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 25 10 0 33 10 0 12 10 0 31 Lane width 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, Ne 2 2 4 4 4 1 2 2 1 4 1 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 SB Only Thru & RT NB Only 08 G= 14.0 Timing iy= 5 G= 2.3 IY= G= 17.7 G= iY= G= 16.5 G= 20.0 G= 20.0 G= 5 Y= 5 Y= 4.5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow rate, v 258 512 250 1687 714 299 1000 292 1657 315 Lane group capacity,c 206 589 259 286 1824 1 236 1683 715 Vic ratio, X 1.25 0.87 0.97 1.04 1.05 0.55 1.24 0.98 0.44 Total green ratio, g/C 0.12 10.18 0.15 0.21 0.16 10.38 0.13 0.34 10.46 Uniform delay, di 53.0 48.0 150.8 147.5 50.3 29.5 52.0 39.2 122.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.920 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.38 0.47 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 Incremental delay, d2 145.3 112.0 45.9 44.9 59.8 0.9 137.6 18.6 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 198.3 60.0 96.8 92.4 110.1 28.1 189.6 57.8 22.2 Lane group LOS F E F F F C F E C Approach delay 106.3 93.6 47.0 69.8 Approach LOS F F D I E Intersection delay 73.8 Xc = 1.05 Intersection LOS I E HCS20OFM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 115 file:HC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k30C.tmp 2/15/2006 2557: S 312 St & 28 Av S 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis -k 4 * k J* I2/14/2006 # 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT. SB.R Lane Configurations + + + 4 r Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 350 0 38 0 0 0 59 219 0 0 175 320 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 350 0 38 0 0 0 59 219 0 0 175 320 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 -NB 1 SIB 1 SIB 2 Volume Total (vph) 388 0 278 175 320 Volume Left (vph) 350 0 59 0 0 Volume Right (vph) 38 0 0 0 320 Hadj (s) 0.14 0.00 0.06 0.02 -0.68 Departure Headway (s) 5.9 6.8 6.0 6.2 5.5 Degree Utilization, x 0.64 0.00 0.47 0.30 0.49 Capacity (veh/h) 581 436 558 552 624 Control Delay (s) 18.9 9.8 14.2 10.7 12.5 Approach Delay (s) 18.9 0.0 14.2 11.9 Approach LOS C A B B Intersection Summary Delay 14.8 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 1 116 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT -WB,R ML - NBT NBR SaL W $1313, Lane Configurations +T+ ++ r M tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3233 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1506 3422 3424 1510 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3233 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1506 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 120 683 148 351 1188 167 296 506 319 153 520 196 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 120 683 148 351 1188 167 296 506 319 153 520 196 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 0 78 0 0 24 0 0 161 Lane Group Flow (vph) 120 816 0 351 1188 89 296 506 295 153 520 35 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.5 35.8 31.5 58.8 58.8 12.2 24.7 56.2 9.0 21.5 21.5 Effective -Green, g (s) 8.0 35.8 31.0 58.8 58.8 11.7 24.7 55.7 8.5 21.5 21.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.30 0.26 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.21 0.46 0.07 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 225 965 867 1746 760 337 715 0.04 c0.25 0.10 c0.33 c0.09 c0.15 0.06 0.53 0.85 0.40 0.68 0.12 0.88 0.71 54.2 39.5 36.9 23.4 16.6 53.4 44.3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.2 9.1 0.1 2.2 0.3 21.3 2.6 55.4 48.6 37.0 25.6 16.9 74.7 46.9 E D D C B E D 49.4 27.1 47.1 D C D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. 40.6 HCM Level of Service 0.81 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 76.5% ICU Level of Service 15 699 242 613 271 0.11 0.04 c0.15 0.09 0.02 0.42 0.63 0.85 0.13 21.4 54.2 47.7 41.4 1.00 0.96 0.78 1.20 0.2 3.7 9.7 0.1 21.6 55.7 46.9 49.8 C E D D 49.1 D 7 20.0 D Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 8 117 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 ---* 0 -)Ir 4r- ■-- `1- 1\ t /0 i 41 Movement EBL _ EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SBL S.B.T SBR Lane Configurations Vi) tO 11 +++ r )) tt1* )) tt+ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3438 4973 3351 4925 1499 3278 4724 3344 5014 1487 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3438 4973 3351 4925 1499 3278 4724 3344 5014 1487 Volume (vph) 396 873 112 401 1088 270 228 836 221 354 1244 484 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 396 873 112 401 1088 270 228 836 221 354 1244 484 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 178 0 41 0 0 0 182 Lane Group Flow (vph) 396 972 0 401 1088 92 228 1016 0 354 1244 302 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.5 39.0 13.5 39.5 39.5 12.3 28.8 15.7 32.2 32.2 Effective Green, g (s) 13.0 40.0 14.0 41.0 41.0 12.8 29.8 16.2 33.2 33.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.33 0.12 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.25 0.13 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.5 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 372 1658 391 1683 512 350 1173 451 1387 411 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.20 c0.12 c0.22 0.07 c0.22 0.11 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.20 v/c Ratio 1.06 0.59 1.03 0.65 0.18 0.65 0.87 0.78 0.90 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 53.5 33.1 53.0 33.4 27.7 51.5 43.2 50.2 41.8 39.4 Progression Factor 0.80 0.60 0.61 0.40 0.30 0.76 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 54.0 0.9 45.2 1.4 0.6 2.2 4.6 5.1 5.0 3.6 Delay (s) 96.8 20.7 77.4 14.7 8.9 41.4 46.8 54.2 45.8 43.2 Level of Service F C E B A D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 42.5 28.1 45.9 46.6 Approach LOS D C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 40.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 9 118 3055: S 320 St & 23 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action __O. j- '+-- A_ 4% t I2/14/2006 # Movement EBL EBT EBR_ WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR $BL SBT SBR, Lane Configurations Vi) ttT ViVi ttT Vi T rrt Vi) T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3334 4819 3554 5106 1688 1570 1325 3244 1728 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3334 4819 3554 5106 1688 1570 1325 3244 1728 Volume (vph) 88 1150 45 289 1543 189 93 151 400 439 188 75 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 88 1150 45 289 1543 189 93 151 400 439 188 75 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 10 0 0 17 10 0 13 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 88 1192 0 289 1722 0 93 216 308 439 250 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.5 37.6 22.4 53.5 10.8 19.9 42.3 19.6 28.7 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 38.6 21.9 54.5 10.3 20.4 42.3 19.1 29.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.32 0.18 0.45 0.09 0.17 0.35 0.16 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 167 1550 649 2319 145 267 522 516 420 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.25 0.08 c0.34 0.06 c0.14 0.11 c0.14 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.77 0.45 0.74 0.64 0.81 0.59 0.85 0.60 Uniform Delay, d1 55.6 36.7 43.6 27.0 53.1 47.9 31.8 49.1 40.2 Progression Factor 0.74 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 3.7 0.2 2.2 7.1 15.4 1.2 12.0 1.5 Delay (s) 42.6 36.0 43.8 29.2 60.1 63.3 33.0 62.9 43.5 Level of Service D D D C E . E C E D Approach Delay (s) 36.5 31.3 47.9 55.6 Approach LOS D C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 10 119 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SIB - 320 Ramp HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR _, WBL WBT V IJIR N.BL NBR SWL2 SWL ,SWR: Lane Configurations tt r tt A err Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3487 1446 150 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 1536 763 161 1355 0 0 0 482 26 1039 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1536 763 161 1355 0 0 0 482 26 1039 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1536 507 161 1355 0 0 0 254 254 989 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 69.3 69.3 79.3 69.3 26.2 26.2 41.2 Effective Green, g (s) 69.3 69.3 79.3 69.3 25.7 25.7 40.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.66 0.58 0.21 0.21 0.34 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2014 835 236 2064 356 356 1212 v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 0.06 0.38 0.15 0.15 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.35 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.61 0.68 0.66 0.71 0.71 0.82 Uniform Delay, d1 19.1 16.5 36.3 17.3 43.7 43.7 36.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.8 3.3 5.2 1.3 5.6 5.6 4.1 Delay (s) 21.9 19.8 40.8 12.8 49.3 49.3 40.3 Level of Service C B D B D D D Approach Delay (s) 21.2 15.8 0.0 43.3 Approach LOS C B A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 26.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 11 120 3064: S 320 St & Military Rd S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 Movement EBL _EBT EBR WBL WBT : WBR NBL. NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11 tt r )' tT+ VIi t r I t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1755 3421 1518 1770 3308 1755 1786 1556 1770 1801 1540 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1755 3421 1518 1770 3308 1755 1786 1556 1770 1801 1540 Volume (vph) 216 1189 243 225 980 183 108 122 98 184 275 204 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 216 1189 243 225 980 183 108 122 98 184 275 204 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 124 0 11 0 0 0 76 0 0 113 Lane Group Flow (vph) 216 1189 119 225 1152 0 108 122 22 184 275 91 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 45.8 45.8 20.6 56.4 11.5 17.5 17.5 16.1 22.1 22.1 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 45.8 45.8 20.6 56.4 11.5 17.5 17.5 16.1 22.1 22.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.17 0.47 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 146 1306 579 304 1555 168 260 227 237 332 284 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.35 0.13 c0.35 0.06 0.07 c0.10 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.01 0.06 v/c Ratio 1.48 0.91 0.21 0.74 0.74 0.64 0.47 0.10 0.78 0.83 0.32 Uniform Delay, d1 55.0 35.2 24.9 47.2 25.9 52.3 47.0 44.4 50.2 47.1 42.4 Progression Factor 0.88 0.81 0.34 0.98 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 247.4 10.6 0.8 7.2 2.8 6.2 0.5 0.1 13.5 14.8 0.2 Delay (s) 295.7 39.0 9.2 53.2 26.6 58.4 47.5 44.5 63.7 62.0 42.7 Level of Service F D A D C E D D E E D Approach Delay (s) 68.3 30.9 50.2 56.5 Approach LOS E C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 52.0 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 12 121 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 --* -* 4 .4- 4-- 4\ t /0. " i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N_ BL NBT NBR SBL SBT $BR Lane Configurations I + r M T. ++1+ I ++1+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1700 1755 4889 1696 4941 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1700 1755 4889 1696 4941 Volume (vph) 77 233 189 391 242 77 212 1094 283 206 1545 71 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 77 233 189 391 242 77 212 1094 283 206 1545 71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 161 0 11 0 0 39 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 77 233 28 391 308 0 212 1338 0 206 1613 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 18.5 18.5 19.3 29.8 12.5 41.1 22.6 51.2 Effective Green, g (s) 7.5 18.0 18.0 18.8 29.3 12.0 41.1 22.1 51.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.24 0.10 0.34 0.18 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 263 216 509 415 176 1674 312 2108 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.13 0.12 c0.18 c0.12 c0.27 0.12 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.89 0.13 0.77 0.74 1.20 0.80 0.66 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 55.1 50.0 44.2 48.5 41.9 54.0 35.7 45.5 29.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.41 0.28 Incremental Delay, d2 14.1 27.2 0.1 6.2 6.2 133.6 4.1 1.9 1.3 Delay (s) 69.2 77.2 44.3 54.7 48.1 187.6 39.8 65.8 9.6 Level of Service E E D D D F D E A Approach Delay (s) 63.5 51.7 59.5 15.9 Approach LOS E D E B Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 41.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.1 % ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 13 122 4028: SW 336th St & 21 Av SW 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2/14/2006 * Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT V11BR NBL NBT NBR SBL. SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT T1 tT +T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1754 3278 1771 3271 1741 3298 1791 3360 Fit Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.19 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 184 3278 446 3271 229 3298 363 3360 Volume (vph) 276 570 125 300 969 275 214 540 122 273 676 160 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 276 570 125 300 969 275 214 540 122 273 676 160 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 22 0 0 17 0 0 18 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 276 680 0 300 1222 0 214 645 0 273 818 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 1 1 4 1 4 1 2 2 1 4 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 54.1 39.1 53.9 39.0 41.0 31.0 43.0 32.0 Effective Green, g (s) 56.1 40.1 55.9 40.0 43.0 32.0 45.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.33 0.47 0.33 0.36 0.27 0.38 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 295 1095 383 1090 221 879 279 924 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.21 0.10 c0.37 0.09 0.20 c0.10 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 0.26 0.26 c0.27 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.62 0.78 1.12 0.97 0.73 0.98 0.89 Uniform Delay, d1 53.5 33.6 22.3 40.0 31.0 40.1 31.5 41.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 35.1 0.8 9.3 66.9 50.7 5.4 47.2 12.2 Delay (s) 88.5 34.4 31.6 106.9 81.7 45.5 78.8 53.8 Level of Service F C C F F D E D Approach Delay (s) 49.8 92.3 54.4 60.0 Approach LOS D F D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 67.8 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 14 123 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 PORT General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Agency or Co. Federal Way CC 02 Area Type All other areas Date Performed 0212412004 Jurisdiction Time Period 5:00 pm Analysis Year 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action ProiectID and EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Nt 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 Lane group L T R L TR L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 302 354 257 132 399 237 199 1286 40 233 1699 336 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.5 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.972 0.972 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 lao 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 177 10 0 76 10 0 1 2 10 0 44 Lane width 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N 1 N N 3 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, Ne 6 0 6 6 2 2 1 6 0 6 2 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 13.3 3.3 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Thru & RT Excl. Left 07 08 Timing G= 12.4 G= 26.2 IY= 6.5 IY= 6.5 G= G= IY= G= 47.9 G= 9.5 G= 1Y= G= Y= Y= 5.5 Y= 5.5 Y= Duration of Analysis. T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 302 354 80 132 560 199 1324 233 1699 292 Lane group capacity, c 286 414 350 265 734 281 1990 150 .2061 835 v/c ratio, X 1.06 0.86 0.23 0.50 0.76 0.71 0.67 1.55 0.82 0.35 Total green ratio, g/C 0.39 0.23 0.23 0.38 0.23 0.08 0.40 0.08 0.40 0.53 Uniform delay, di 44.1 44.2 137.5 27.2 43.4 1 53.6 29.2 55.0 32.0 16.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.891 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.37 0.04 0.04 0.28 0.23 0.50 1 0.50 0.50 0.04 Incremental delay, d2 68.7 15.2 0.1 0.5 4.3 6.7 1.7 .279.1 3.9 1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 112.8 59.5 37.6 27.7 47.7 60.2 27.7 .334.1 35.9 16.5 Lane group LOS F E D C D E C F D B Approach delay 79.0 43.9 32.0 64.6 Approach LOS E D C E Intersection delay 54.3 X = 1.03 Intersection LOS D HCS200JM Copyright ® 2000 University offlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 124 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k31D.tmp 2/15/2006 I B1 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL W.BT WBR : . SE,L SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations tip fl + ? T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1727 3202 1740 3459 1770 1809 1516 1761 1658 Flt Permitted 0.34 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 627 3202 703 3459 562 1809 1516 668 1658 Volume (vph) 35 365 99 279 689 81 77 176 141 230 185 184 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 35 365 99 279 689 81 77 176 141 230 185 184 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 6 0 0 0 118 0 34 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 447 0 279 764 0 77 176 23 230 335 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 52.5 48.7 68.1 59.3 26.2 19.6 19.6 41.9 29.3 Effective Green, g (s) 52.5 48.7 68.1 59.3 27.2 19.6 19.6 41.9 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.41 0.57 0.49 0.23 0.16 0.16 0.35 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 309 1299 523 1709 204 295 248 391 405 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.14 c0.06 0.22 0.02 0.10 c0.08 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.24 0.06 0.02 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.34 0.53 0.45 0.38 0.60 0.09 0.59 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 19.4 24.6 14.1 19.7 37.9 46.5 42.6 29.8 43.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.4 2.2 0.1 1.5 12.4 Delay (s) 19.5 25.3 14.7 20.6 38.3 48.7 42.7 31.3 55.4 Level of Service B C B C D D D C E Approach Delay (s) 24.9 19.0 44.5 46.1 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 16 125 4840: SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 i- � � T � � 41 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL INIBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 4% -1 % 7% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3384 3294 3484 3393 1728 3270 1814 3507 1574 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3384 3294 3484 3393 1728 3270 1814 3507 1574 Volume (vph) 171 726 128 257 1524 179 119 322 52 159 541 337 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 171 726 128 257 1524 179 119 322 52 159 541 337 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 7 0 0 11 0 0 0 76 Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 843 0 257 1696 0 119 363 0 159 541 261 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.8 44.5 18.5 54.2 12.4 17.6 16.4 21.6 31.4 Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 46.0 19.0 54.7 12.9 18.1 16.9 22.1 32.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.38 0.16 0.46 0.11 0.15 0.14 0.18 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 290 1263 552 1547 186 493 255 646 425 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.26 0.07 c0.50 0.07 0.11 c0.09 c0.15 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.67 0.47 1.10 0.64 0.74 0.62 0.84 0.61 Uniform Delay, d1 52.8 30.7 45.9 32.6 51.3 48.7 48.6 47.2 38.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 2.8 0.2 54.1 4.9 4.6 3.4 8.9 1.9 Delay (s) 54.8 33.5 46.1 86.7 57.7 58.9 51.9 56.1 40.2 Level of Service D C D F E E D E D Approach Delay (s) 37.0 81.4 58.6 50.3 Approach LOS D F E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 61.7 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 17 126 4848: S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 --* -• --* 'r '- 4\ t /". v.1 -V Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL: WBT WBR NBL NOT NBR S_ BL $BT SBR Lane Configurations Vi +0 )VI t" i' ViVi tt r Vi ++ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 1 % 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1690 4659 3276 4785 3262 3376 1484 1762 3495 1494 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1690 4659 3276 4785 3262 3376 1484 1762 3495 1494 Volume (vph) 116 969 147 400 1399 120 90 311 248 169 909 228 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 116 969 147 400 1399 120 90 311 248 169 909 228 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 8 0 0 0 180 0 0 92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 1099 0 400 1511 0 90 311 68 169 909 136 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 4 4 6 4 6 4 0 0 4 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.9 40.0 15.9 47.0 7.6 16.1 16.1 24.0 32.5 32.5 Effective Green, g (s) 9.9 41.0 16.9 48.0 8.6 17.1 17.1 25.0 33.5 33.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.14 0.40 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 139 1592 461 1914 234 481 211 367 976 417 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.24 c0.12 c0.32 0.03 c0.09 0.10 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.69 0.87 0.79 0.38 0.65 0.32 0.46 0.93 0.33 Uniform Delay, d1 54.2 34.0 50.5 31.6 53.2 48.6 46.2 41.6 42.1 34.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.67 0.91 0.98 1.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 31.8 2.5 12.7 2.8 0.4 2.1 0.3 0.3 14.8 0.2 Delay (s) 86.0 36.5 47.3 24.0 48.6 49.7 67.9 41.9 56.9 34.5 Level of Service F D D C D D E D E C Approach Delay (s) 41.2 28.9 56.5 51.1 Approach LOS D C E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 41.0 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120:0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 18 127 5228: SW 356 St & 21 Av SW HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL. WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL-_ SBT, SBR Lane Configurations 1 +T I T +T r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 11 Grade (%) 0% -1 % 0% 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 1810 1778 3320 1770 1680 1777 1503 Fit Permitted 0.13 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.73 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 463 1810 847 3320 790 1680 1356 1503 Volume (vph) 424 418 2 136 787 264 62 18 34 235 59 370 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 424 418 2 136 787 264 62 18 34 235 59 370 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 25 0 0 0 185 Lane Group Flow (vph) 424 420 0 136 1021 0 62 27 0 0 294 185 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 2% 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 40.9 31.5 33.5 27.8 19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3 Effective Green, g (s) 40.9 31.5 33.5 27.8 19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.44 0.47 0.39 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) _ 660 797 471 1291 213 453 366 406 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.23 0.02 c0.31 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 0.11 0.08 c0.22 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.53 0.29 0.79 0.29 0.06 0.80 0.45 Uniform Delay, d1 11.2 14.6 11.0 19.3 20.7 19.4 24.3 21.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 0.3 0.1 3.2 0.3 0.0 11.4 0.3 Delay (s) 12.8 14.9 11.2 22.4 21.0 19.4 35.7 22.0 Level of Service B B B C C B D C Approach Delay (s) 13.8 21.2 20.2 28.1 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 71.5 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 19 128 5246: S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action 2/14/2006 --* ---► --t f- *-- Q 4\ t / . \*� 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL. NBT NBR SBL SBT., . SBR Lane Configurations ►� ��r�, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1% -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3456 1828 1540 1725 3474 3333 3307 1770 3512 1540 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3456 1828 1540 1725 3474 3333 3307 1770 3512 1540 Volume (vph) 160 374 319 185 604 34 267 407 83 55 1076 343 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 160 374 319 185 604 34 267 407 83 55 1076 343 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 148 0 4 0 0 13 0 0 0 126 Lane Group Flow (vph) 160 374 171 185 634 0 267 477 0 55 1076 217 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.9 27.1 27.1 15.4 33.6 11.0 49.7 6.8 45.5 45.5 Effective Green, g (s) 8.9 27.1 27.1 15.4 33.6 11.0 50.7 6.8 46.5 46.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.28 0.09 0.42 0.06 0.39 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 256 413 348 221 973 306 1397 100 1361 597 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.20 c0.11 0.18 c0.08 c0.14 0.03 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.91 0.49 0.84 0.65 0.87 0.34 0.55 0.79 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 53.9 45.2 40.5 51.1 38.1 53.8 23.4 55.1 32.5 26.2 Progression Factor 0.77 0.85 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.38 0.31 Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 20.0 0.3 22.3 1.2 22.2 0.7 1.7 2.2 0.8 Delay (s) 44.7 58.6 28.4 73.4 39.3 76.0 24.0 56.3 14.5 8.9 Level of Service D E C E D E C E B A Approach Delay (s) 44.7 46.9 42.4 14.8 Approach LOS D D D B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33A HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 20 129 5251: S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - NO Action * I2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N T NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 ? 1 ��j tt+ Vi tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1740 1503 1785 1760 3484 3548 1761 3522 Fit Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1288 1503 611 1760 3484 3548 1761 3522 Volume (vph) 332 16 277 18 25 15 419 725 9 15 1167 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 332 16 277 18 25 15 419 725 9 15 1167 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 193 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 348 84 18 30 0 419 734 0 15 1167 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 2% 1 % 2% 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 35.5 34.5 34.5 13.5 63.8 2.7 51.0 Effective Green, g (s) 36.5 36.5 36.5 36.5 15.5 64.8 3.7 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.13 0.54 0.03 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 392 457 186 535 450 1916 54 1556 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.12 0.21 0.01 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm c0.27 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.18 0.10 0.06 0.93 0.38 0.28 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 39.8 30.8 29.9 29.5 51.7 16.0 56.8 28.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.01 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 20.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 25.7 0.6 1.0 3.4 Delay (s) 60.1 30.8 30.0 29.6 75.4 16.7 57.9 31.3 Level of Service E C C C E B E C Approach Delay (s) 47.1 29.7 38.0 31.7 Approach LOS D C D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 37.3 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 21 130 2009 AM V11 b Alt 3 52: S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 M,aveMent EBL EST ERR_ j .TR. . T B . B $B F Lane Configurations +'* )) ttT )) ttT+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 3335 3262 3150 3352 4655 3385 4708 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 3335 3262 3150 3352 4655 3385 4708 Volume (vph) 165 284 28 208 227 159 108 1249 595 180 351 54 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 165 284 28 208 227 159 108 1249 595 180 351 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 110 0 0 64 0 0 15 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 165 305 0 208 276 0 108 1780 0 180 390 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 6 6 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 14.9 13.6 14.1 8.1 61.5 10.0 63.4 Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 14.9 13.6 14.1 8.1 61.5 10.0 63.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.07 0.51 0.08 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 210 414 370 370 226 2386 282 2487 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.09 0.06 c0.09 0.03 c0.38 c0.05 0.08 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.79 0.74 0.56 0.75 0.48 0.75 0.64 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 51.3 50.7 50.4 51.2 53.9 23.1 53.2 14.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 16.2 5.8 0.9 5.4 0.6 2.2 3.5 0.1 Delay (s) 67.5 56.5 45.9 49.2 54.5 25.3 56.7 14.7 Level of Service E E D D D C E B Approach Delay (s) 60.3 48.1 26.9 27.6 Approach LOS E D C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 34.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 131 2009 AM V11 b Alt 3 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SIB - 272 Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 -1' --t 4 4--- fi >� Movement EBL EBT EBR W-B4 APT WBR, NBL,,. NBT N8R SK ,$;BT SBR Lane Configurations 0 tt 1 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % -3% 6% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3234 1814 3479 1614 1643 1528 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3234 1814 3479 1614 1643 1528 Volume (vph) 0 1183 252 246 414 0 0 0 0 190 8 224 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1183 252 246 414 0 0 0 0 190 8 224 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 192 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1422 0 246• 414 0 0 0 0 96 102 32 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Split custom Protected Phases 4 3 8 6 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 73.5 20.2 87.7 11.3 11.3 16.3 Effective Green, g (s) 73.5 20.2 87.7 11.3 11.3 17.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.17 0.73 0.09 0.09 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summa 1981 305 2543 c0.44 c0.14 0.12 152 155 0.06 c0.06 0.72 0.81 0.16 0.63 0.66 16.1 48.0 4.9 52.3 52.5 1.00 0.65 1.80 1.00 1.00 2.3 12.8 0.1 6.1 7.5 18.4 44.0 9.0 58.5 59.9 B D A E E 18.4 22.0 0.0 51.5 B C A D 284 0.01 0.02 0.11 44.7 1.00 0.1 44.7 D HCM Average Control Delay 24.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.8% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 132 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General information Site Information Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way City Center Date Performed Time Period AM Peak Intersection S 272 St & 272 -1-5 NB Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 AM V11 Alt 3 Project ID Federal Wa gLty Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LT R Volume, V (vph) 641 681 1 406 850 187 11 400 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 2 2 4 1 4 1 4 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P P A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 1 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 4 2 1 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.715 0.715 0.239 10.239 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 157 10 0 182 0 Lane width 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 3 N N -2 N N -1 N N N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 5 4 0 0 3 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 1 3.2 Phasing Thru & RT EB CnIx 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 51.0 G= 39.0 G= I G= G= 15.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= IY= JY= 5 Y= 1Y= IY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 _ Cycle Lenglh, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB S8 LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 641 681 406 693 198 218 Lane group capacity, c 556 2596 1460 672 234 201 v/c ratio, X 1.15 0.26 0.28 1.03 0.85 1.08 Total green ratio, g/C 0.32 0.79 0.43 10.43 0.13 0.13 Uniform delay, d, 40.5 3.3 22.5 34.5 51.4 52.5 Progression factor, PF 0,965 :2.108 0.867 1 000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.36 0.50 Incremental delay, dz 83.2 0.2 1 0.1 25.6 22.8 87.8 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 122.3 7.1 19.6 60.1 74.2 140.3 Lane group LOS F A B I E I E F Approach delay 63.0 45.2 108.8 Approach LOS E D F Intersection delay 62.8 Xc = 1.08 Intersection LOS E HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.I f 133 file•//C..r\T)ncnments and Seftinuc\Jnhn.T)OM1\T.neni Seftinoc\Temn\.q2k-109_tmn 1/6/2006 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed Time Period Saturday Intersection S 272 St & Military Rd S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 AM V11 Alt 3 Project ID Federal Way City Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB N8 S13 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT L7 I TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L T R L TR L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 424 630 117 118 734 119 514 623 171 58 129 84 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 6 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.871 0.871 7.671 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qy 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 46 10 0 11 10 0 86 10 0 75 Lane width 12.0 111.0 12.0 112.0 11.0 1 112.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 Parking /Grade /Parking N -3 N N 0 N N 0 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, Na 2 3 0 0 4 4 2 3 3 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing Thru & RT EB Only Excl. Left 04 SB Onl NB Only07 08 Timing G= 26.0 1Y= G= 2.0 G= 15.0 IY= G= G= 9.7 IY= G= 42.3 G= G= 1Y= 5 Y= 5 JY= 5 5 Y= 5 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 424 630 71 118 842 514 623 85 58 129 9 Lane group capacity, c 320 933 1036 221 721 620 636 534 143 148 123 v/c ratio, X 1.33 0.68 0.07 0.53 1.17 0.83 0.98 0.16 0.41 0.87 0.07 Total green ratio, g/C 0.18 10.28 0.67 0.13 0.22 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.08 0.08 Uniform delay, di 49.0 38.7 6.9 49.2 47.0 135.5 38.4 26.7 52.4 54.5 51.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 19.151 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.07 0.50 0.34 0.48 0.04 0.04 0.38 0.04 Incremental delay, d2 164.0 3.4 0.0 1.3 90A 8.7 30.4 0.1 0.7 38.0 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 Control delay 213.0 •42.1 1 1.0 50.5 1371 44.2 68.8 26.7 53.1 92.6 51.1 Lane group LOS F D A �D:� D E C D I F D Approach delay 104.0 126.4 55.5 79.0 Approach LOS F F E E Intersection delay 91.8 Xc = 1.09 Intersection LOS F HCS2000T M Copyright © 2000 University offlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 r 134 file://CADocuments and Settings\John.DOM I \Local Settings\Temp\s2k31C.tmp 1/6/2006 1 2009 AM V11 b Alt 3 1651: S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 } I t *� Movement EBL EBR. NBL NBT SBT- SBR Lane Configurations r Vi ttt ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 i Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3305 1488 1787 4951 4901 1564 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3305 1488 1787 4951 4901 1564 Volume (vph) 876 157 149 566 429 223 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 876 157 149 566 429 223 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 77 0 0 0 55 Lane Group Flow (vph) 876 80 149 566 429 168 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 } Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 2 6 0 Turn Type Perm Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 8 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 47.8 47.8 13.8 60.7 40.9 88.7 Effective Green, g (s) 48.3 48.3 14.8 61.7 41.9 90.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.12 0.51 0.35 0.75 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1330 599 220 2546 1711 1241 v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 c0.08 0.11 c0.09 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.05 } v/c Ratio 0.66 0.13 0.68 0.22 0.25 0.14 Uniform Delay, di 29.1 22.6 50.3 16.0 27.9 4.1 Progression Factor 0.89 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 7.20 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.0 6.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 26.9 19.4 56.7 16.2 23.7 29.6 Level of Service C B E B C C i Approach Delay (s) 25.8 24.6 25.7 Approach LOS C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 25.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 5 135 2009 AM V11 b Alt 3 3028: SW 320 St & 21 Av SW Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT- EBR WBL WBT WBR, NBL NBt NBR. _ SBL, SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1) tT - + r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3352 3446 3376 1760 1818 1488 1755 3159 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 3352 3446 3376 723 1818 1488 405 3159 Volume (vph) 361 771 123 99 253 25 209 570 383 87 265 165 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 361 771 123 99 253 25 209 570 383 87 265 165 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0 55 0 78 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 361 883 0 99 272 0 209 570 328 87 352 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 3 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 3 3 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.9 33.9 10.3 18.3 59.4 48.8 59.1 50.2 44.2 Effective Green, g (s) 26.4 34.4 10.3 18.3 60.3 49.3 59.6 50.2 44.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.29 0.09 0.15 0.50 0.41 0.50 0.42 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 393 961 296 515 459 747 739 237 1164 v/s Ratio Prot 0.20 c0.26 0.03 c0.08 c0.04 c0.31 0.04 0.02 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.18 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.92 0.33 0.53 0.46 0.76 0.44 0.37 0.30 Uniform Delay, d1 45.7 41.5 51.6 46.9 17.5 30.3 19.5 23.7 26.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.67 Incremental Delay, d2 25.5 13.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 7.3 0.2 0.3 0.5 Delay (s) 71.3 54.6 51.9 47.3 17.8 37.6 19.7 22.8 18.5 Level of Service E D D D B D B C B Approach Delay (s) 59.4 48.5 28.1 19.2 Approach LOS E D C B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 40.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 6 136 2009 AM V11 b Alt 3 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --I --I ,- .- 'Q 4\ Movement EBL EBT EB.R . WBL WBT WER NBL N.RT . _ N_BR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT4 tT r tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3236 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1495 3422 3424 1510 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3236 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1495 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 260 1102 231 135 273 72 56 409 268 113 360 66 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 260 1102 231 135 273 72 56 409 268 113 360 66 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 35 0 0 46 0 0 54 Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 1320 0 135 273 37 56 409 222 113 360 12 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 63.5 10.5 61.0 61.0 5.4 18.9 29.4 8.1 21.6 21.6 Effective Green, g (s) 12.5 63.5 10.0 61.0 61.0 4.9 18.9 28.9 7.6 21.6 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.53 0.08 0.51 0.51 0.04 0.16 0.24 0.06 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 352 1712 280 1811 789 141 547 360 217 616 272 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.41 0.04 0.08 0.02 c0.12 c0.05 c0.03 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.10 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.77 0.48 0.15 0.05 0.40 0.75 0.62 0.52 0.58 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 52.2 22.5 52.5 15.7 14.9 56.1 48.3 40.6 54.4 45.1 40.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.56 0.73 Incremental Delay, d2 6.8 3.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.7 4.9 2.2 0.9 0.8 0.0 Delay (s) 59.0 25.9 53.0 15.9 15.0 56.8 53.1 42.8 54.1 26.2 29.8 Level of Service E C D B B E D D D C C Approach Delay (s) 31.3 26.2 49.6 32.5 Approach LOS C C D C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 34.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 7 137 2009 AM V11 b Alt 3 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp Federal Wav Citv Center 1/11/2006 / Movement EBL EBT EBR_ WBL WBT WBR NBL, _ NB,R SWL2 SWL SWR Lane Configurations tt r* tt err Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3487 1446 181 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 1535 480 197 1038 0 0 0 240 9 770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1535 480 197 1038 0 0 0 240 9 770 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1535 322 197 1038 0 0 0 124 125 569 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 73.2 73.2 97.2 81.2 13.3 13.3 29.3 Effective Green, g (s) 73.2 73.2 97.2 81.2 12.8 12.8 28.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.81 0.68 0.11 0.11 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2127 882 401 2418 177 177 858 v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 c0.08 0.29 0.07 0.08 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.37 0.49 0.43 0.70 0.71 0.66 Uniform Delay, d1 16.3 11.7 24.1 8.8 51.7 51.8 41.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.08 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 1.2 0.3 0.5 9.8 10.0 1.5 Delay (s) 18.5 12.9 26.4 5.8 61.5 61.8 42.7 Level of Service B B C A E E D Approach Delay (s) 17.1 9.1 0.0 47.3 Approach LOS B A A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 22.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 8 IiRN] 2009 AM V11 b Alt 3 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 } --► -i 1- *-- *-- .4\ I l� Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL. _ WBT WBR NOV NBT NOR 5131, S,BT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1659 1792 1499 1660 3273 3368 4873 1796 5120 1547 At Permitted 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 571 1792 1499 312 3273 3368 4873 1796 5120 1547 Volume (vph) 114 457 183 59 375 94 405 642 74 108 340 208 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 114 457 183 59 375 94 405 642 74 108 340 208 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 129 0 21 0 0 10 0 0 0 120 Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 457 54 59 448 0 405 706 0 108 340 88 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 42.1 34.0 34.0 37.9 31.9 20.5 45.6 10.9 36.0 44.1 Effective Green, g (s) 45.1 35.5 35.5 39.9 32.9 21.0 46.1 11.4 36.5 46.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.27 0.18 0.38 0.10 0.30 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 302 530 443 182 897 589 1872 171 1557 594 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.26 0.02 0.14 c0.12 c0.14 c0.06 0.07 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.04 0.09 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.86 0.12 0.32 0.50 0.69 0.38 0.63 0.22 0.15 Uniform Delay, d1 25.7 39.9 30.9 29.7 36.6 46.4 26.6 52.3 31.1 24.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 13.1 0.0 0.4 0.2 2.5 0.5 5.5 0.3 0.0 Delay (s) 26.0 53.1 30.9 30.1 36.8 29.9 10.3 57.8 31.4 24.2 Level of Service C D C C D C B E C C Approach Delay (s) 43.6 36.0 17.4 33.5 Approach LOS D D B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 9 139 2009 AM V11 b Alt 3 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 3, --. � C � I,- 4 "* '%� *" (�► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SQL SET SER NWL NWT ._ NWR Lane Configurations +T. +T + r 1 13. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0,95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 Fit Protected 0.95 1,00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1716 3205 1746 3361 1771 1809 1534 1761 1622 Fit Permitted 0.62 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.62 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1121 3205 463 3361 724 1809 1534 1157 1622 Volume (vph) 81 621 187 81 155 55 65 169 10 70 106 182 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 621 187 81 155 55 65 169 10 70 106 182 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 33 0 0 33 0 0 0 8 0 95 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 775 0 81 177 0 65 169 2 70 193 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.7 24.1 26.7 24.1 13.8 10.3 10.3 14.0 10.4 Effective Green, g (s) 26.7 24.1 26.7 24.1 14.8 10.3 10.3 15.0 10.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.39 0.43 0.39 0.24 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 511 1254 255 1315 250 302 256 327 274 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.24 c0.01 0.05 c0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.12 0.04 0.00 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.62 0.32 0.13 0.26 0.56 0.01 0.21 0.71 Uniform Delay, dl 10.4 15.1 10.8 12.0 18.6 23.6 21.4 18.4 24.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.1 6.6 Delay (s) 10.4 17.3 11.0 12.3 18.8 24.8 21.4 18.5 30.7 Level of Service B B B B B C C B C Approach Delay (s) 16.7 11.9 23.1 28.3 Approach LOS B B C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 19.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 61.6 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 10 140 2009 SAT V11 b Alt 3 Federal Wa Ci Center 52: S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 11 /i.1 Pmnn Movement Lane Configurations, EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL 58T SBFt ILane deal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Width 12 1°1 12 11 11 1900 1900 1900 1900 900 1900 Grade (o) 1 /0 12 11 11 11 12 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 3% 0 -2 /o 01 2 /o Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 5.0 0.95 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 0.95 1747 1.00 3250 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 3262 0.95 3244 1.00 3352 4605 3385 4779 Satd. Flow erm} 1747 3250 3244 0.95 1.003262 0.95 1.00 Volume (vph) 113 384 113 390 335 116 3204 4766 3327 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 465 1 045 60 Adj. Flow (vph) 113 384 113 390 335 116 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 204 766 465 327 1045 60 Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 474 0 0 390 30 421 0 0 82 0 0 5 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 0 204 1149 0 327 1100 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % o0 °/ % % 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr 2 2 6 1 2 2% 2 2 % 2% 210 Turn Type Prot 6 Prot 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Protected Phases 7 4 Prot Prot Permitted Phases 3 8 5 2 1 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 20.7 17.6 26.7 Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 20.7 17.6 10.7 46.7 15.0 51.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.17 0.15 0.22 0.22 10.7 46.7 15.0 51.0 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.09 0.39 0.12 0.42 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Ca Lane Grp p(vph) 169 561 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.15 478 722 c0.12 0.13 299 1792 423 2031 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.25 c0.10 c0.23 v/c Ratio 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 52.3 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.5 Delay (s) 59.9 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 0.84 48.1 0.82 0.58 0.68 0.64 0.77 0.54 1.00 49.6 41.7 53.0 0.89 0.86 29.8 50.9 25.8 10.8 1.00 7.7 0.6 1.00 1.00 1.00 58.9 5.0 52.1 36.6 58.0 1.8 31.6 1.8 E D D E C 8.8 58.7 26.8 59.0 43.8 35 E C E D D 34.1 C 39.9 HCM Level of Service D 0.77 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 77.2% ICU Level of Service D 15 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 141 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 1/11/2006 Federal Way City Center II EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBA SBT SBR Movement Lane Configurations tl�' 1900 1900 T1t 1900 1900 1902 1900 1900 1900 1900 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 190 0 12 12 11 11 12 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 -3°0 6°�0 -1% Grade (%) 1 % 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Frt 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1614 0.96 1642 1.00 1524 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 3164 1814 3479 0.95 0.96 1.00 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 1614 1642 1524 Satd. Flow {perm} 3164 1814 3479 0 0 0 0 308 10 375 Volume (vph) 0 857 285 156 1.00 426 1.00 1.00 1.b0 1 00 1 00 1 000 1375 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 308 10 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 857 285 156 426 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 253 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 164 122 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1122 0 156 426 10 10 10 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 1 % 1 % 1 %1% 2% 2% 2% 2°/3 2 0 2°4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 4 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 5 0 0 Split custom Turn Type Prot 3 8 6 6 7 Protected Phases 4 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 74.5 14.7 83.1 15.8 15.8 15.8 15.8 20.9 21.9 Effective Green, g (s) 74.5 14.7 83.1 0.13 0.13 0.18 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 .12 0.12 .69 0 .69 5.0 5.0 6.0 Clearance Time (s) 5•0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 213 216 342 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1964 222 2409 0.10 c0.10 0.02 v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 c0.09 0.12 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm 0.57 0.70 0.18 0.72 50.0 0.76 50.3 0.36 42.9 v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 13.4 50.6 6.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 Progression Factor 1.00 1.35 0.21 0 2 9.8 12.7 0.2 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 7 6 59.8 63.0 43.1 Delay (s) 14.6 75.8 1.5 A E E D Level of Service B E 21.4 0.0 51.514.6 Approach Delay (s) C A D Approach LOS B Intersection SummaryC 26.8 HCM Level of Service HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 ICU Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Page 2 Mirai Associates, Inc. 142 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 59: S 272 St & 272 - 1-5 NB Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 t � � 'r � '1- t Is. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR . _NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT _.SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1% -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1872 1584 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1872 1584 Volume (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 416 161 14 145 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 416 161 14 145 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 77 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 296 0 175 68 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 95.3 45.3 45.3 14.7 14.7 Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 95.3 45.3 45.3 14.7 14.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.79 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 641 2599 1294 521 229 194 v/s Ratio Prot c0.28 0.19 0.11 c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.24 0.29 0.57 0.76 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 3.2 26.1 29.6 51.0 48.3 Progression Factor 0.80 0.15 0.46 0.37 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 0.2 0.5 3.9 12.7 0.4 Delay (s) 29.6 0.7 12.6 15.0 63.7 48.7 Level of Service C A B B E D Approach Delay (s) 13.1 13.9 56.9 0.0 Approach LOS B B E A Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 19.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 3 143 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 60: S 272 St & Military Rd S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL 'EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBE_ NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Tt r tT. ' t r t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 3385 1500 1770 3291 1759 1804 1470 1775 1828 1523 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1748 3385 1500 1770 3291 1759 1804 1470 1775 1828 1523 Volume (vph) 87 521 213 94 538 77 301 186 77 71 211 115 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 521 213 94 538 77 301 186 77 71 211 115 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 85 0 8 0 0 0 54 0 0 98 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 521 128 94 607 0 301 186 23 71 211 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 3 0 0 4 2 4 2 3 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot pm+ov Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 47.5 72.2 10.0 47.9 24.7 35.2 35.2 7.3 17.8 17.8 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 47.5 72.2 10.0 47.9 24.7 35.2 35.2 7.3 17.8 17.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.40 0.60 0.08 0.40 0.21 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 140 1.340 903 148 1314 362 529 431 108 271 226 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.15 0.03 c0.05 c0.18 c0.17 0.10 0.04 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.39 0.14 0.64 0.46 0.83 0.35 0.05 0.66 0.78 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 53.4 25.9 10.4 53.2 26.6 45.7 33.4 30.4 55.1 49.2 44.0 Progression Factor 0.93 0.88 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.9 0.8 0.0 6.4 1.2 14.3 0.1 0.0 10.5 12.1 0.1 Delay (s) 55.8 23.7 7.3 59.6 27.7 60.0 33.6 30.4 65.6 61.3 44.1 Level of Service E C A E C E C C E E D Approach Delay (s) 22.9 32.0 47.2 57.1 Approach LOS C C D E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 36.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 4 144 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center _ 1/11/2006 --► --t i' .- -1 t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR : NBL_ NBT . NBR SBL SBT $,,BR, Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 3278 1759 3288 1759 4838 1773 4938 1533 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1764 3278 1759 3288 1759 4838 1773 4938 1533 Volume (vph) 238 387 124 230 502 150 252 1053 148 238 1029 151 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 238 387 124 230 502 150 252 1053 148 238 1029 151 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 27 0 0 24 0 0 14 0 0 0 52 Lane Group Flow (vph) 238 484 0 230 628 0 252 1187 0 238 1029 99 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Prot 7 18.3 18.3 0.15 5.0 2.0 4 21.2 21.2 0.18 5.0 2.0 Prot 3 22.4 22.4 0.19 5.0 2.0 8 25.3 25.3 0.21 5.0 2.0 Prot 5 21.5 21.0 0.18 4.5 2.0 2 38.3 38.3 0.32 5.0 2.0 Prot 1 18.6 18.1 0.15 4.5 2.0 6 35.4 35.4 0.30 5.0 2.0 pm+ov 7 6 53.7 53.7 0.45 5.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 269 579 328 693 308 1544 267 1457 686 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.15 0.13 c0.19 0.14 c0.25 c0.13 0.21 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.84 0.70 0.91 0.82 0.77 0.89 0.71 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 49.8 47.7 45.7 46.2 47.7 36.9 50.0 37.7 19.6 Progression Factor 0.84 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 25.1 9.0 5.4 15.2 9.1 2.2 28.2 2.9 0.0 Delay (s) 66.8 48.1 51.1 61.4 43.8 27.1 78.1 40.6 19.6 Level of Service E D D E D C E D B Approach Delay (s) 54.0 58.7 30.0 44.6 Approach LOS D E C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 44.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mira! Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 5 145 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 2750: S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR ,NBL N,BT NBR S.BL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ; (rr I W. I ttl Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1799 1652 1717 1657 1752 4652 1787 4895 Flt Permitted 0.49 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 926 1652 229 1657 1752 4652 1787 4895 Volume (vph) 117 152 245 255 126 155 260 1181 336 182 1199 51 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 117 152 245 255 126 155 260 1181 336 182 1199 51 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 49 0 0 37 0 0 42 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 348 0 255 244 0 260 1475 0 182 1247 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 4 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 35.4 27.1 48.0 33.7 20.0 44.0 14.0 38.0 Effective Green, g (s) 35.9 26.6 47.5 33.2 19.5 44.0 13.5 38.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.22 0.40 0.28 0.16 0.37 0.11 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 345 366 288 458 285 1706 201 1550 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.21 c0.12 0.15 c0.15 c0.32 0.10 0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.23 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.95 0.89 0.53 0.91 0.86 0.91 0.80 Uniform Delay, d1 31.6 46.1 31.6 36.8 49.4 35.2 52.6 37.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.11 0.87 1.06 0.70 0.52 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 34.1 25.2 0.6 15.9 2.6 30.0 3.3 Delay (s) 31.8 80.1 60.8 41.6 58.9 39.9 66.6 22.8 Level of Service C F E D E D E C Approach Delay (s) 69.1 50.7 42.7 28.3 Approach LOS E D D C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 42.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 6 146 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center _ _ 1/11/2006 --* --I. 'r .4- 41 Movement EBL EBT EBR- WBL WBT WBR. , NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t'+ M tt r tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3287 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1501 3422 3424 1510 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3287 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1501 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 116 1163 114 384 1042 132 180 474 483 149 335 61 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 116 1163 114 384 1042 132 180 474 483 149 335 61 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 62 0 0 21 0 0 51 Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 1271 0 384 1042 70 180 474 462 149 335 10 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 .8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 53.6 18.5 63.8 63.8 10.0 19.8 38.3 9.1 18.9 18.9 Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 53.6 18.0 63.8 63.8 9.5 19.8 37.8 8.6 18.9 18.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.45 0.15 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.16 0.32 0.07 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 220 1468 503 1894 825 274 573 473 245 539 238 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.39 0.11 0.29 c0.05 0.14 c0.15 0.04 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.16 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.87 0.76 0.55 0.09 0.66 0.83 0.98 0.61 0.62 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 54.3 30.0 49.0 18.6 13.8 53.7 48.4 .40.7 54.1 47.2 42.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 7.1 6.1 1.2 0.2 4.3 9.1 34.8 2.9 1.6 0.0 Delay (s) 55.4 37.1 55.1 19.8 14.0 58.0 57.5 75.4 57.0 48.8 42.9 Level of Service E D E B B E E E E D D Approach Delay (s) 38.6 28.0 65.2 50.4 Approach LOS D C E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. 42.9 HCM Level of Service 0.85 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 83.6% ICU Level of Service 15 9 15.0 E Synchro 6 Report Page 7 147 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 } --► 'Jr *-- I- -ON Movement EBI., F..BT EBR, "'K WBT VVBR NBL NB I N'BR Lane Configurations M ttT. ttt r +0 1) ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3438 5033 3351 4925 1499 3278 4719 3344 5014 1487 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3438 5033 3351 4925 1499 3278 4719 3344 5014 1487 Volume (vph) 661 1197 57 490 1017 299 223 795 218 370 915 445 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 661 1197 57 490 1017 299 223 795 218 370 915 445 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 183 0 41 0 0 0 245 Lane Group Flow (vph) 661 1250 0 490 1017 116 223 972 0 370 915 200 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.8 36.4 17.5 35.6 35.6 12.0 28.7 14.4 31.1 31.1 Effective Green, g (s) 18.3 37.4 18.0 37.1 37.1 12.5 29.7 14.9 32.1 32.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.31 0.15 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.25 0.12 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.5 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 524 1569 503 1523 463 341 1168 415 1341 398 v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 c0.25 c0.15 0.21 0.07 c0.21 c0.11 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.13 v/c Ratio 1.26 0.80 0.97 0.67 0.25 0.65 0.83 0.89 0.68 0.50 Uniform Delay, d1 50.8 37.8 50.8 36.1 31.0 51.7 42.8 51.8 39.4 37.2 Progression Factor 0.84 0.77 0.53 0.36 0.11 0.63 0.62 0.53 0.41 0.21 Incremental Delay, d2 129.9 3.5 7.1 0.2 0.1 2.5 3.7 12.5 0.6 0.2 Delay (s) 172.7 32.8 34.0 13.1 3.4 35.3 30.4 39.8 16.8 7.9 Level of Service F C C B A D C D B A Approach Delay (s) 81.1 17.2 31.2 19.4 Approach LOS F B C B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 8 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way City Center Date Performed 01/1112009 Time Period 12:00 am Intersection S 320 St & 20 Av S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 SAT v1lb Alt 3 Project ID Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 553 1311 199 413 1377 382 239 172 184 338 256 311 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Arrival type, AT 4 5 4 5 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.692 0.692 0.090 0.090 1.000 1.000 0.973 0.973 Initial unmet demand, Qh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 17 10 0 42 10 0 32 10 0 37 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -3 N N 2 N N -1 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 6 0 8 8 0 6 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing WB Only Thru & RT E8 Only 04 Excl. Left SB Only NS Perm 08 Timing G= 15.5 G= 19.0 IY= G= 17.0 G= G= 10.5 G= 5.5 G= 24.5 G= Y= 4.5 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 4.5 Y= 4.5 Y= 4.5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 1 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 553 1493 413 1717 239 324 338 530 Lane group capacity, c 484 1729 430 1580 205 349 351 480 v/c ratio, X 1.14 0.86 0.96 1.09 1.17 a93 0.96 1.10 Total green ratio, g/C 0.14 0.34 0.13 0.32 0.28 0.20 0.41 0.28 Uniform delay, di 51.8 36.9 52.2 40.5 41.8 47.2 32.8 43.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.654 1.000 c7.679 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.46 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.47 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 8a6 4.3 6.3 40.3 114.8 30.0 37.3 72.0 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 1132.3 28.4 58.5 67.8 '156.6 77.2 70.1 LF Lane group LOS F C E E F E E Approach delay 56.5 66.0 110.9 97.6 Approach LOS E E F F Intersection delay 71.9 X, = 1.14 Intersection LOS E HCS20007M Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1( 149 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period Intersection S 320 St & 23 Av S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 SAT v11 Alt 3 Project ID Federal Way City Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 0 2 3 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR R L TR Volume, V (vph) 190 1624 72 495 :2031 376 56 166 335 470 156 144 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P I P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 1 2.5 Arrival type, AT 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.366 0.366 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.974 0.974 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 3 10 0 20 10 0 15 10 0 32 Lane width 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 5 N N -5 N N 1 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nro Buses stopping, NB 2 16 0 8 8 2 16 16 0 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp_ 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 Thru & RT SB Only Excl. Left 08 Timing G= 10.2 IY= G= 22.7 G= 20.0 G= G= 18.9 G= 2.3 G= 13.9 1 G= Y= 4.5 6 Y= 6 JY= Y= 5.5 Y= 5.5 Y= 4.5 JY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 C ele Lenglih_. C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WS N13 SB L'r TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 190 1693 495 .2387 56 208 278 470 268 Lane group capacity,c 270 1539 576 .2102 188 275 512 574 384 v/c ratio, X 0.70 1.10 0.86 1.14 0.30 0.76 0.54 0.82 0.70 Total green ratio, g/C 0.08 .0.32 1 0.16 0.41 0.11 10.16 0.37 0.18 0.23 Uniform delay, di 53.7 40.8 148.9 35.2 49.0 148.0 29.8 47.6 42.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0 970 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.23 0.50 0.37 0.50 0.04 0.28 0.08 0.33 0.22 Incremental delay, d2 2.6 49.3 11.6 167.5 0.3 10.3 0.7 8.4 4.5 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 56.3 88.9 60.5 102.6 49.3 158.3 30.5 55.9 47.2 Lane group LOS E F E F D J E C E D Approach delay 85.6 95.4 43.1 52.7 Approach LOS F F D D Intersection delay 82.5 Xc = 0. 35 Intersection LOS F HcswodTt''t Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 150 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT E,BR W.BL WBT VI(BR NB,L NBR SWL2 SWL SWR Lane Configurations tt rrt tt W Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3487 1446 95 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 1996 664 157 1628 0 0 0 133 3 780 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1996 664 157 1628 0 0 0 133 3 780 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1996 485 157 1628 0 0 0 68 68 722 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 79.3 79.3 89.3 79.3 16.2 16.2 31.2 Effective Green, g (s) 79.3 79.3 89.3 79.3 15.7 15.7 30.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.74 0.66 0.13 0.13 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2304 956 212 2362 218 218 914 v/s Ratio Prot c0.57 0.06 0.46 0.04 0.04 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.34 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.51 0.74 0.69 0.31 0.31 0.79 Uniform Delay, d1 16.1 10.4 39.6 12.7 47.3 47.3 41.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.04 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.7 1.9 9.6 1.4 0.3 0.3 4.3 Delay (s) 20.8 12.3 50.9 12.9 47.6 47.6 45.9 Level of Service C B D B D D D Approach Delay (s) 18.7 16.2 0.0 46.1 Approach LOS B B A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 22.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 11 151 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 3058: S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp Federal Wav Citv Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBB WBL W5T WBR SBL SBR NEL2 NEL NER Lane Configurations 0 r tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 3373 1434 3592 1532 1681 1620 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (perm) 3373 1434 3592 1532 1681 1620 Volume (vph) 0 1156 978 0 1139 119 0 0 629 2 108 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1156 978 0 1139 119 0 0 629 2 108 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 28 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1156 978 0 1139 99 0 0 385 326 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles M 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Turn Type Free Perm Split Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.7 60.0 33.7 33.7 16.8 16.8 Effective Green, g (s) 33.7 60.0 33.7 33.7 16.3 16.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.56 0.56 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1895 1434 2018 860 457 440 v/s Ratio Prot 0.34 0.32 0.23 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm c0.68 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.68 0.56 0.12 0.84 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 8.8 0.0 8.4 6.2 20.6 19.9 Progression Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.4 1.1 0.3 12.7 5.6 Delay (s) 9.1 1.4 9.6 6.4 33.4 25.5 Level of Service A A A ' A C C Approach Delay (s) 5.6 9.3 0.0 29.6 Approach LOS A A A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 12 152 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WEST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi + if M T Vi W+ Vi++It* Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1698 1755 4863 1696 4890 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1698 1755 4863 1696 4890 Volume (vph) 130 172 132 282 242 79 230 994 302 237 1117 121 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 130 172 132 282 242 79 230 994 302 237 1117 121 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 115 0 10 0 0 41 0 0 10 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 130 172 17 282 311 0 230 1255 0 237 1228 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 0 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.9 15.6 15.6 21.0 24.7 21.5 45.1 19.8 43.4 Effective Green, g (s) 11.4 15.1 15.1 20.5 24.2 21.0 45.1 19.3 43.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.20 0.18 0.38 0.16 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 169 220 181 555 342 307 1828 273 1769 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.10 0.09 c0.18 0.13 c0.26 c0.14 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.78 0.09 0.51 0.91 0.75 0.69 0.87 0.69 Uniform Delay, d1 53.0 50.9 46.4 45.2 46.8 47.0 31.5 49.1 32.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 0.67 Incremental Delay, d2 17.1 15.2 0.1 0.3 26.2 8.5 2.1 15.6 1.4 Delay (s) 70.1 66.1 46.5 45.4 73.0 55.5 33.6 45.4 23.3 Level of Service E E D D E E C D C Approach Delay (s) 61.3 60.1 36.9 26.9 Approach LOS E E D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 39.3 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to,Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 13 153 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR 'WBL WBT W_ BR SEL SET $ER NWL NWT NWR, Lane Configurations + T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1724 3233 1746 3424 1770 1809 1533 1761 1612 Fit Permitted 0.50 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 901 3233 442 3424 745 1809 1533 1213 1612 Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) 76 1.00 76 0 76 10 3% 0 572 1.00 572 25 679 3% 0 132 1.00 132 0 0 10 3% 3 199 1.00 199 0 199 10 1 % 3 367 1.00 367 20 421 1% 0 74 1.00 74 0 0 10 1 % 0 94 1.00 94 0 94 10 1% 0 129 1.00 129 0 129 1 % 0 82 1.00 82 69 13 10 1 % 3 114 1.00 114 0 114 2% 0 95 1.00 95 112 173 2% 0 190 1.00 190 0 0 2% 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.4 21.6 30.8 24.8 15.4 10.0 10.0 16.0 10.3 Effective Green, g (s) 24.4 21.6 30.8 24.8 16.4 10.0 10.0 17.0 10.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.34 0.48 0.39 0.26 0.16 0.16 0.26 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 378 1086 333 1321 292 281 238 378 258 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.21 c0.06 0.12 c0.03 0.07 0.03 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.23 0.05 0.01 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.63 0.60 0.32 0.32 0.46 0.05 0.30 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 13.0 17.9 10.8 13.8 19.0 24.7 23.1 18.6 25.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.7 1.9 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.2 5.3 Delay (s) 13.0 20.7 12.7 14.5 19.3 25.1 23.2 18.8 30.7 Level of Service B C B B B C C B C Approach Delay (s) 19.9 13.9 22.8 27.3 Approach LOS B B C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 19.9 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.3 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 14 154 Appendix L 2009 Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 3 (No Action) — Mitigated Attached are the 2009 intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for Alternative 3 intersections that required mitigation actions. Analysis of the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours used the Synchro 6.0 (Build 612) analysis software to report the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) intersection operations. Where intersections exceeded the City's Level of Service threshold of LOS E or a volume -to -capacity ratio of less than 1.0, results were exported from Synchro to the Highway Capacity Software (version 4.1f). Documents: 7. 2009 PM Peak Hour HCM results — Mitigated Intersections 8. 2009 AM Peak Hour HCM results — (Note: No Mitigated Intersections) 9. 2009 Saturday Peak Hour HCM results — Mitigated Intersections 155 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 -MIT 2550: S 312 St &Pacific Hwy S 2/17/2006 Federal Way CC 02 4/ Movement Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Width Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 101 12 12 1% 0% 5.0 0% 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 1.00 5.0 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1764 1.00 3281 1759 3261 3439 4852 1773 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 3439 1.00 4852 1773 1764 3281 1759 3261 541 206 299 902 110 292 258 410 1.00 127 1.00 250 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 258 410 127 250 541 206 299 902 110 2922 0 25 0 0 0 250 33 714 0 0 2999 12 1000 0 292 258 512 10 10 100 10 10 10 10 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%2 1% 1% 2 2 4 4 4 2 Prot Prot Pr Prot 5 2 1 7 4 3 8 18.5 21.9 23.8 27.2 11.5 32.6 32.6 22.2 21.7 18.5 21.9 23.8 27.2 11.0 0.09 0.27 0.18 0.15 0.18 0.20 0.23 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 272 2.0 599 349 739 315 1318 321 0.16 0.15 c0.16 0.14 c0.22 c0.09 0.21 SE-7 1900 11 0% 5.0 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4938 1.00 4938 1657 1.00 1657 0 1657 0.95 0.85 0.72 0.97 0.95 0.76 0.91 48.2 50.3 47.5 44.9 45.9 54.2 0.77 40.1 0.70 1.00 0.90 0.88 1.00 1.00 31.5 3.3 27.6 38.4 10.4 5.7 50.7 70.5 70.5 73.3 31.2 75.8 83.8 52.1 D E E C E F D 62.4 65.5 40.8 E E D Intersection Sunflary 50.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0•95 20.0 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. 1% 4 SBR 1900 12 5.0 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 1530 1.00 1530 346 1.00 346 14 332 10 1% 4 pm+ov 6 7 6 43.3 61.8 43.3 61.8 0.36 0.52 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1782 788 c0.34 0.07 0.15 0.93 0.42 36.9 18.0 1.00 1.00 10.1 0.1 47.0 18.2 D B 46.3 D Synchro 6 Report Page 7 156 2009 BASE PM Alt 3 - MIT 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way CC v12 ♦ I2/17/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL, WBT WBR NBL,. NBT NBR SB.L SBT SON Lane Configurations I + r +T, 1) ++1a I +++ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1661 1792 1499 1657 3172 3368 4941 1796 5120 1552 Fit Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 232 1792 1499 673 3172 3368 4941 1796 5120 1552 Volume (vph) 302 354 257 132 399 237 199 1286 40 233 1699 336 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 302 354 257 132 399 237 199 1286 40 233 1699 336 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 175 0 77 0 0 3 0 0 0 44 Lane Group Flow (vph) 302 354 82 132 559 0 199 1323 0 233 1699 292 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.9 32.3 32.3 32.8 24.2 9.3 39.3 16.3 46.3 63.0 Effective Green, g (s) 48.4 33.8 33.8 34.8 25.2 9.8 39.8 16.8 46.8 65.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.21 0.08 0.33 0.14 0.39 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 310 505 422 274 666 275 1639 251 1997 841 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.20 0.04 0.18 0.06 0.27 c0.13 c0.33 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 0.05 0.10 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.70 0.20 0.48 0.84 0.72 0.81 0.93 0.85 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 34.3 38.6 32.8 33.1 45.5 53.8 36.6 51.0 33.4 15.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.84 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 43.6 3.6 0.1 0.5 8.8 7.5 4.3 37.0 4.8 0.1 Delay (s) 77.9 42.2 32.8 33.6 54.2 52.8 27.6 88.0 38.2 15.6 Level of Service E D C C D D C F D B Approach Delay (s) 51.4 50.7 30.8 40.0 Approach LOS D D C D Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 40.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 15 157 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 3 Mit 1 3052: S 320 St & 20 Av S Federal Way City Center 6/9/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M ttT tO t r t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1 % -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3519 5032 1769 4825 1735 1891 1522 1705 1846 1524 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.38 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3519 5032 1769 4825 468 1891 1522 681 1846 1524 Volume (vph) 553 1311 199 413 1377 382 239 172 184 338 256 311 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 553 1311 199 413 1377 382 239 172 184 338 256 311 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 40 0 0 0 158 0 0 258 Lane Group Flow (vph) 553 1494 0 413 1719 0 239 172 26 338 256 53 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 8 0 8 0 6 6 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.6 38.1 30.4 48.9 31.0 17.5 17.5 35.0 19.5 19.5 Effective Green, g (s) 19.1 38.1 29.9 48.9 30.0 17.0 17.0 34.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.32 0.25 0.41 0.25 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 560 1598 441 1966 254 268 216 321 292 241 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.30 0.23 c0.36 0.10 0.09 c0.13 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.02 c0.17 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.99 0.93 0.94 0.87 0.94 0.64 0.12 1.05 0.88 0.22 Uniform Delay, d1 50.3 39.7 44.1 32.7 40.6 48.6 45.0 40.5 49.4 44.0 Progression Factor 0.57 0.44 0.66 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.92 0.66 Incremental Delay, d2 28.4 8.7 4.1 0.6 40.1 3.9 0.1 63.5 22.6 0.2 Delay (s) 56.9 26.4 33.5 11.0 80.7 52.5 45.1 99.5 67.9 29.2 Level of Service E C C B F D D F E C Approach Delay (s) 34.6 15.2 61.5 66.4 Approach LOS C B E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 35.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 158 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way City Center Date Performed 01/1112009 Time Period 12:00 am Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID S 320 St & 23 Av S All other areas 2009 SAT v1lb Alt 3 Mit 1 Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, NI 2 3 0 2 3 0 1 1 2 2 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L T R L TR Volume, V (vph) 190 1624 72 495 2031 376 56 166 335 470 156 144 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 2.5 Arrival type, AT 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 10.450 0.450 1.000 -1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.959 0.959 Initial unmet demand. Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 3 10 0 19 10 0 12 10 0 32 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 5 N N -5 N N 1 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 2 16 0 8 8 2 16 16 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 Thru & RT SB Only Excl. Left 08 Timing G= 10.3 G= 25.2 IY= G= 20.0 G= 1Y= G= 16.3 G= 4.5 G= 11.7 G= Y= 4.5 6 Y= 6 Y= 5.5 Y= 5.5 Y= 4.5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EI3 WB NB SS LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 190 1693 495 2388 56 166 323 470 268 Lane group capacity, c 273 1643 578 2208 158 246 880 574 379 v/c ratio, X .0.70 1.03 0.86 1.08 0.35 0.67 0.37 0.82 0.71 Total green ratio, g/C 0.08 0.34 0.16 0.44 0.09 0.14 0.35 0.18 0.22 Uniform delay, di 53.6 39.5 48.9 33.9 151.0 49.0 29.2 147.6 43.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.951 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k '0.22 0.50 0.37 0.50 0.04 0.20 0.04 0.33 0.23 Incremental delay, d2 2.9 23.4 111.6 45.4 0.5 1 5.9 0.1 8.2 4.9 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 56.6 61.0 60.5 79.3 51.5 54.9 129.3 55.8 47.9 Lane group LOS E E E E D D C E D Approach delay 60.6 76.1 39.4 52.9 Approach LOS E E D D Intersection delay 65.1 Xc = 0.92 Intersection LOS E HCS200d .. Copyright (D 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version 4.1 f 159 Blank We Appendix J. 2009 Baseline Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 1 Attached are the 2009 intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for Alternative 1 intersections. Analysis of the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours used the Synchro 6.0 (Build 612) analysis software to report the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) intersection operations. Where intersections exceeded the City's Level of Service threshold of LOS E or a volume -to -capacity ratio of less than 1.0, results were exported from Synchro to the Highway Capacity Software (version 4.1 f). Documents: 1. 2009 PM Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline 2. 2009 AM Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline 3. 2009 Saturday Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline 161 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT Genera! Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC vl2 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 PM All 1 Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB 56 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, NI 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 2 3 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 80 353 170 973 252 48 155 826 489 262 1855 7 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 0.893 0.893 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 48 10 0 15 10 0 88 10 0 0 Lane width 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 1 11.0 111.0 112,0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N 3 NE N -2 N N 2 N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, NB 2 2 6 0 0 2 2 6 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing Thru & RT Excl. Left 03 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 Timing G= 20.0 G= 26.0 1Y= G= G= G= 10.8 G= 43.2 G= G= Y= 5 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 C c!e Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 80 475 973 285 155 1227 262 1862 Lane group capacity, c 379 542 707 557 302 1687 305 1733 v/c ratio, X 0.21 0.88 1.38 0.51 0.51 0.73 0.86 1.07 Total green ratio, g/C 0.22 0.17 10.22 0.17 0.09 0.36 0.09 0.36 Uniform delay, di 38.6 48.8 47.0 145.6 52.1 33.3 53.8 38.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.04 0.39 0.50 0.05 0.05 0.50 0.37 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 0.1 14.4 177.3 0.3 0.7 2.8 20.2 44.7 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 38.7 63.2 .224.3 45.9 52.7 36.1 74.0 83.1 Lane group LOS D E F D D D E F Approach delay 59.7 183.8 37.9 82.0 Approach LOS E F D F Intersection delay 92.3 Xc = 1 09 Intersection LOS F HCS20007M Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.I f 162 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k281.tmp 2/15/2006 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC 02 Date Performed 02/2412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection S 272 St & /-5 SB - 272 Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 PM Alt 1 Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Lane group TR L T L LT R Volume, V (vph) 692 401 613 601 691 42 664 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) P P A P A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 3.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, I 1.000 19.523 0.523 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 68 0 10 0 33 Lane width 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N -3 N N N N -1 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 5 0 4 3 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.2 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 SB Only 06 07 08 G= 22.5 Timing Y= 6 G= 31.1 G= 17.0 G= G= 28.4 G= G= G= IY= 5 Y= 5 IY= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 1025 613 601 352 381 631 Lane group capacity, c '1606 257 1543 402 1 410 733 v/c ratio, X 0.64 2.39 0.39 0.88 0.93 0.86 Total green ratio, g/C 0.50 0.14 0.44 0.24 0.24 0.47 Uniform delay, d, 122.3 51.5 22.5 44.1 44.8 28.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.846 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.39 0.43 0.37 Incremental delay, d2 2.0 629.6 0.4 1 18.3 27.1 9.8 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 124.2 1681.1 19.4 62.4 71.9 37.6 Lane group LOS C F B E E D Approach delay 24.2 353.5 53.7 Approach LOS C F D Intersection delay 146.3 X, = 1.00 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University orFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f 163 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k294,tmp 2/15/2006 59: S 272 St & 272 - 1-5 NB Ramp HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 �-- 4"I # I2/14/2006 t Movement EBL EBT EBR :WBL- WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB.R Lane Configurations tt tt r 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1 % -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.98 Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1473 1878 1604 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1710 3272 3428 1473 1878 1604 Volume (vph) 273 1364 0 0 978 619 301 51 362 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 273 1364 0 0 978 619 301 51 362 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 141 0 0 34 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 1364 0 0 978 478 0 352 328 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 35.9 19.9 19.9 14.1 14.1 Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 35.9 19.9 19.9 14.1 14.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.60 0.33 0.33 0.24 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 314 1958 1137 489 441 377 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.42 0.29 0.19 v/s Ratio Perm c0.32 c0.20 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.70 0.86 0.98 0.80 0.87 Uniform Delay, d1 23.8 8.3 18.7 19.8 21.6 22.1 Progression Factor 1.12 1.00 1.43 2.23 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 16.1 1.5 0.9 8.0 9.1 18.1 Delay (s) 42.8 9.8 27.8 52.2 30.7 40.2 Level of Service D A C D C D Approach Delay (s) 15.3 37.2 35.5 0.0 Approach LOS B D D A Intersection Summary. HCM Average Control Delay 27.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.1 % ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 3 'md Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC vl2 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID S 272 St & Military Rd S All other areas 2009 PM Alt 1 Volume and Timing In ut EB f WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L T R L TR L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 279 808 438 241 1432 99 190 208 73 104 546 187 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 10.672 0.672 0.672 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 100 10 0 4 10 0 49 10 0 121 Lane width 12.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -3 N N 0 N N 0 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, No, Buses stopping, NB 2 3 0 0 4 4 2 3 3 0 1 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 1 3.3 3.3 Phasing Thru & RT WB Only Excl. Left 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 Timing G= 29.7 IY= G= 7.0 G= 10.0 G= G= 9.7 G= 38.6 G= G= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 C cle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SS LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow rate, v 279 806 338 241 1527 190 208 24 104 546 66 Lane group capacity, c 146 840 507 325 1170 142 580 487 143 586 504 v/c ratio, X 1.91 0.96 0.67 0.74 1,31 1.34 0.36 0.05 0.73 0.93 0.13 Total green ratio, g/C 0.06 0.25 10.33 0.18 0.35 0.06 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.32 0.32 Uniform delay, di 55.0 44.6 34.7 46.3 39.2 55.2 31.2 28.1 53.9 39.4 28.8 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 .0.963 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.19 0.26 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.25 0.43 0.04 Incremental delay, dz .426.6 17.8 1.8 7.8 143.6 191.9 10.1 0.0 114.9 20.9 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 481.6 62.4 135.2 54.1 182.7 24T 31.3 28.1 68.8 60.3 26.9 Lane group LOS F E D D F F C C E E C Approach delay 138.0 16,r 128.3 58.6 Approach LOS F F F E Intersection delay 135.1 X = 1.22 Intersection LOS F NCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 165 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k2FB.tmp 2/15/2006 1050: S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL V\1BT VVI3R NBL NBT NBR SOL SST SEA Lane Configurations 4, M T. I W, M tt1+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 15 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1814 3545 1588 1805 4907 3432 5025 Flit Permitted 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1814 3545 1588 1805 4907 3432 5025 Volume (vph) 29 30 26 546 24 226 41 977 390 392 2366 43 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 29 30 26 546 24 226 41 977 390 392 2366 43 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 181 0 0 60 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 70 0 546 69 0 41 1307 0 392 2408 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 6 6 0 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 21.7 21.7 1.5 37.4 23.9 59.8 Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 23.7 23.7 3.0 38.9 25.4 61.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.32 0.21 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 181 700 314 45 1591 726 2567 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.15 0.04 0.02 c0.27 0.11 c0.48 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.39 0.78 0.22 0.91 0.82 0.54 0.94 Uniform Delay, d1 50.5 45.7 40.4 58.4 37.4 42.1 27.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.76 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 5.2 0.1 96.6 4.7 0.4 8.2 Delay (s) 51.0 50.9 40.5 146.2 33.1 42.5 35.8 Level of Service D D D F C D D Approach Delay (s) 51.0 47.6 36.4 36.7 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 5 166 1056: S 288 St & Military Rd S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N.BT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I tip 1) t13 I t r Vii t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1817 3327 3328 3191 1760 1777 1524 1799 1846 1583 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.48 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1817 3327 3328 3191 888 1777 1524 433 1846 1583 Volume (vph) 124 355 152 294 497 139 155 284 171 336 502 191 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 124 355 152 294 497 139 155 284 171 336 502 191 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 39 0 0 20 0 0 0 121 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 124 468 0 294 616 0 155 284 50 336 502 191 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.1 18.5 11.0 22.4 21.2 21.2 21.2 28.7 28.7 28.7 Effective Green, g (s) 7.1 18.5 11.0 22.4 21.7 21.7 21.7 29.2 29.2 29.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.22 0.13 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 156 742 442 862 277 465 399 345 650 558 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.14 c0.09 c0.19 0.03 c0.16 c0.14 0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.03 c0.21 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.63 0.67 0.71 0.56 0.61 0.13 0.97 0.77 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 37.2 29.1 34.2 27.4 27.4 26.9 23.4 23.0 23.9 19.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 22.3 1.3 2.9 2.4 1.4 1.7 0.1 41.0 5.2 0.1 Delay (s) 59.5 30.4 37.1 29.7 28.8 28.6 23.4 64.0 29.1 19.9 Level of Service E C D C C C C E C B Approach Delay (s) 36.1 32.1 27.2 38.8 Approach LOS D C C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 34.1 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 82.9 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 6 167 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 PM Alt 1 Project ID Volume and Timin In W EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 260 408 127 247 539 205 299 905 109 289 1651 347 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.936 0.936 1.000 1.000 10.795 0.795 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 25 10 0 33 10 0 12 10 0 31 Lane width 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 SB Only Thru & RT NB Only 08 Timing G= 14.0 IY= G= 2.2 G= 17.8 G= IY= G= 16.5 G= 20.0 G= 20.0 IY= G= ly= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 4.5 Y= 5 5 Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 260 510 247 711 299 1002 289 1651 316 Lane group capacity, c 206 586 261 687 286 1824 236 1683 715 v/c ratio, X 1.26 0.87 0.95 1.03 1.05 0.55 1.22 0.98 0.44 Total green ratio, g/C 0.12 0.18 0.15 0.21 0.16 0.38 0.13 0.34 0.46 Uniform delay, d, 53.0 48.1 50.6 47.5 50.3 29.5 52.0 139.1 22.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 19.920 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.36 0.45 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 Incremental delay, d2 149.1 12.2 40.8 43.7 59.8 1.0 '132.7 17.9 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 202.1 60.2 91.4 91.2 '110.1 28.1 184.7 157.0 22.2 Lane group LOS F E F F F C F I E C Approach delay 108.1 91.2 46.9 68.5 Approach LOS F F D E Intersection delay 73.1 X, = 1.05 Intersection LOS E HCS2000T M Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k270.tmp 2/15/2006 2557: S 312 St & 28 Av S 2009 PM Alt 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis # I2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL : SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 *T Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 351 0 41 0 0 0 60 215 0 0 178 317 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 351 0 41 0 0 0 60 215 0 0 178 317 Direction, Lane # . EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SIB 1 SIB 2 Volume Total (vph) 392 0 275 178 317 Volume Left (vph) 351 0 60 0 0 Volume Right (vph) 41 0 0 0 317 Hadj (s) 0.13 0.00 0.06 0.02 -0.68 Departure Headway (s) 5.9 6.8 6.0 6.2 5.5 Degree Utilization, x 0.65 0.00 0.46 0.31 0.49 Capacity (veh/h) 582 436 557 551 623 Control Delay (s) 19.1 9.8 14.1 10.8 12.5 Approach Delay (s) 19.1 0.0 14.1 11.9 Approach LOS C A B B Intersection Summary Delay 14.8 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 1 169 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL _EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBI NBT NBR SBL SBT BBR Lane Configurations M tT* tt r tt ? tt if Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3233 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1505 3422 3424 1510 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3233 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1505 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 123 682 147 344 1179 170 293 511 315 157 530 202 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 123 682 147 344 1179 170 293 511 315 157 530 202 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 0 80 0 0 23 0 0 165 Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 814 0 344 1179 90 293 511 292 157 530 37 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.6 35.6 31.5 58.5 58.5 12.2 24.8 56.3 9.1 21.7 21.7 Effective Green, g (s) 8.1 35.6 31.0 58.5 58.5 11.7 24.8 55.8 8.6 21.7 21.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.30 0.26 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.21 0.46 0.07 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 228 959 867 1737 757 337 718 700 245 619 273 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.25 0.10 c0.33 c0.08 c0.15 0.11 0.05 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.09 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.85 0.40 0.68 0.12 0.87 0.71 0.42 0.64 0.86 0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 54.1 39.7 36.8 23.6 16.7 53.4 44.3 21.3 54.2 47.6 41.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.79 1.19 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 9.3 0.1 2.2 0.3 19.9 2.8 0.1 4.1 10.4 0.1 Delay (s) 55.4 49.0 36.9 25.7 17.0 73.3 47.1 21.5 56.0 47.8 49.1 Level of Service E D D C B E D C E D D Approach Delay (s) 49.8 27.1 46.7 49.5 Approach LOS D C D D Intersection Summary. HCM Average Control Delay 40.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 8 170 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT ERR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR; Lane Configurations )) W. M ttt if )) ++T )) +t+ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3438 4974 3351 4925 1499 3278 4724 3344 5014 1487 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3438 4974 3351 4925 1499 3278 4724 3344 5014 1487 Volume (vph) 396 871 111 397 1083 268 229 839 222 354 1239 486 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 396 871 111 397 1083 268 229 839 222 354 1239 486 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 176 0 41 0 0 0 182 Lane Group Flow (vph) 396 969 0 397 1083 92 229 1020 0 354 1239 304 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.7 39.2 13.5 39.5 39.5 12.3 28.8 15.5 32.0 32.0 Effective Green, g (s) 13.2 40.2 14.0 41.0 41.0 12.8 29.8 16.0 33.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.34 0.12 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.25 0.13 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.5 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 378 1666 391 1683 512 350 1173 446 1379 409 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.19 c0.12 c0.22 0.07 c0.22 0.11 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.20 v/c Ratio 1.05 0.58 1.02 0.64 0.18 0.65 0.87 0.79 0.90 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 53.4 33.0 53.0 33.3 27.7 51.5 43.2 50.4 41.9 39.6 Progression Factor 0.80 0.60 0.61 0.40 0.30 0.76 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 48.4 0.9 42.5 1.4 0.5 2.2 4.7 5.6 5.1 3.9 Delay (s) 91.2 20.6 74.7 14.7 8.7 41.5 47.0 54.9 46.1 43.7 Level of Service F C E B A D D D D D Approach Delay (s) 40.9 27.4 46.0 47.0 Approach LOS D C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 40.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 9 171 3055: S 320 St & 23 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 --* ---* '1r 'r 4-- *�- 4\ I /0� \► 4/ Movement EBL EBT - EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SOT SBR Lane Configurations )) ++T )) ++T Vi T. ? T, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3334 4818 3554 5107 1688 1564 1325 3244 1732 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 3334 4818 3554 5107 1688 1564 1325 3244 1732 Volume (vph) 85 1153 47 299 1518 183 93 148 407 434 191 72 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 85 1153 47 299 1518 183 93 148 407 434 191 72 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 10 0 0 19 10 0 12 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 85 1197 0 299 1691 0 93 217 309 434 251 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.4 37.7 22.4 53.7 10.8 20.0 42.4 19.4 28.6 Effective Green, g (s) 5.9 38.7 21.9 54.7 10.3 20.5 42.4 18.9 29.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.32 0.18 0.46 0.09 0.17 0.35 0.16 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 164 1554 649 2328 145 267 523 511 420 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.25 0.08 cO.33 0.06 c0.14 0.11 c0.13 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.77 0.46 0.73 0.64 0.81 0.59 0.85 0.60 Uniform Delay, d1 55.7 36.6 43.8 26.6 53.1 47.9 31.7 49.2 40.3 Progression Factor 0.74 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 3.7 0.2 2.0 7.1 16.1 1.2 11.7 1.5 Delay (s) 42.5 36.1 44.0 28.6 60.1 64.0 32.9 62.8 43.5 Level of Service D D D C E E C E D Approach Delay (s) 36.5 30.9 48.1 55.5 Approach LOS D C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 10 172 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SIB - 320 Ramp HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT - EBR: WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SWL2 SWL SWR Lane Configurations tt r Vi tt Vi Zi rr*i* Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3487 1446 147 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 1556 742 154 1363 0 0 0 465 24 1012 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1556 742 154 1363 0 0 0 465 24 1012 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1556 500 154 1363 0 0 0 244 245 962 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 70.1 70.1 80.1 70.1 25.4 25.4 40.4 Effective Green, g (s) 70.1 70.1 80.1 70.1 24.9 24.9 39.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.67 0.58 0.21 0.21 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2037 845 235 2088 345 345 1188 v/s Ratio Prot c0.45 0.05 0.38 0.15 0.15 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.35 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.59 0.66 0.65 0.71 0.71 0.81 Uniform Delay, d1 18.7 15.9 36.0 16.8 44.2 44.2 36.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.8 3.0 4.1 1.3 5.3 5.6 3.9 Delay (s) 21.5 18.9 39.2 12.3 49.5 49.8 40.5 Level of Service C B D B D D D Approach Delay (s) 20.7 15.0 0.0 43.5 Approach LOS C B A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 25.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1 % ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 11 `M.] 3064: S 320 St & Military Rd S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 � � � 'r � t � Movement EBL EBT EBR . WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►j ++ r Vi +T, ►j + r I + r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1755 3421 1518 1770 3307 1755 1786 1556 1770 1801 1540 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1755 3421 1518 1770 3307 1755 1786 1556 1770 1801 1540 Volume (vph) 217 1186 238 219 967 183 108 123 99 187 274 206 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 217 1186 238 219 967 183 108 123 99 187 274 206 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 120 0 11 0 0 0 76 0 0 115 Lane Group Flow (vph) 217 1186 118 219 1139 0 108 123 23 187 274 91 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 46.5 46.5 20.0 56.5 11.5 17.3 17.3 16.2 22.0 22.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 46.5 46.5 20.0 56.5 11.5 17.3 17.3 16.2 22.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.17 0.47 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 146 1326 588 295 1557 168 257 224 239 330 282 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.35 0.12 c0.34 0.06 0.07 c0.11 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.01 0.06 v/c Ratio 1.49 0.89 0.20 0.74 0.73 0.64 0.48 0.10 0.78 0.83 0.32 Uniform Delay, d1 55.0 34.4 24.4 47.5 25.6 52.3 47.2 44.6 50.2 47.2 42.5 Progression Factor 0.88 0.81 0.34 0.97 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 250.3 9.2 0.7 7.4 2.7 6.2 0.5 0.1 14.2 15.4 0.2 Delay (s) 298.6 36.9 9.0 53.6 26.2 58.4 47.7 44.7 64.4 62.6 42.8 Level of Service F D A D C E D D E E D Approach Delay (s) 67.5 30.6 50.3 57.0 Approach LOS E C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 51.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 12 174 '.1 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis `7 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL E_BT , EBR WBL WBT WBR. NBL , NBT NBR SBL SBT S13R 1 Lane Configurations I + r M T. I tt1. ) W. -� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 ^� Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1699 1755 4888 1696 4941 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 -� Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1699 1755 4888 1696 4941 Volume (vph) 76 234 189 403 249 80 212 1097 285 205 1538 70 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 76 234 189 403 249 80 212 1097 285 205 1538 70 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 160 0 11 0 0 39 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 234 29 403 319 0 212 1343 0 205 1605 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% r� Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.9 18.6 18.6 19.8 30.5 12.5 41.1 22.0 50.6 Effective Green, g (s) 7.4 18.1 18.1 19.3 30.0 12.0 41.1 21.5 50.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.25 0.10 0.34 0.18 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 110 264 218 523 425 176 1674 304 2083 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.13 0.12 c0.19 c0.12 c0.27 0.12 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.89 0.13 0.77 0.75 1.20 0.80 0.67 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 55.2 49.9 44.1 48.2 41.5 54.0 35.8 46.0 29.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 0.29 Incremental Delay, d2 14.0 27.2 0.1 6.3 6.2 133.6 4.2 2.2 1.3 Delay (s) 69.2 77.2 44.2 54.5 47.8 187.6 39.9 66.7 9.9 Level of Service E E D D D F D E A Approach Delay (s) 63.5 51.5 59.6 16.3 Approach LOS E D E B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 41.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 ` Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 13 175 4028: SW 336th St & 21 Av SW HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT 'WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SIBT S B R Lane Configurations 0 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1754 3278 1771 3272 1741 3297 1791 3359 Fit Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.19 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 184 3278 445 3272 231 3297 361 3359 Volume (vph) 275 571 125 302 974 274 214 539 122 270 670 159 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 275 571 125 302 974 274 214 539 122 270 670 159 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 21 0 0 17 0 0 18 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 275 681 0 302 1227 0 214 644 0 270 811 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 1 1 4 1 4 1 2 2 1 4 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 54.3 39.1 54.1 39.0 40.8 30.8 42.8 31.8 Effective Green, g (s) 56.3 40.1 56.1 40.0 42.8 31.8 44.8 32.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.33 0.47 0.33 0.36 0.26 0.37 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 298 1095 386 1091 221 874 278 918 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.21 0.10 c0.37 0.09 0.20 c0.10 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 0.26 0.26 c0.27 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.62 0.78 1.12 0.97 0.74 0.97 0.88 Uniform Delay, dl 35.2 33.6 22.2 40.0 31.1 40.3 31.4 41.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 32.1 0.8 9.2 68.2 50.7 5.5 45.7 12.1 Delay (s) 67.3 34.4 31.4 108.2 81.8 45.8 77.1 53.8 Level of Service E C C F F D E D Approach Delay (s) 43.7 93.2 54.6 59.5 Approach LOS D F D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 66.8 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 14 176 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General information Site information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S All other areas 2009 P/4 Alt 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB Nl3 SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Nr 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 Lane group L T R L TR L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 305 357 260 133 400 237 199 '1286 40 233 1703 337 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.5 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 0.972 0.972 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 176 10 0 76 10 0 2 10 0 45 Lane width 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N 1 N N 3 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 6 0 6 6 2 2 1 6 0 6 2 Min, time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Thru & RT Excl, Left 07 OB Timing G= 12.4 IY= G= 26.3 G= G= G= 47.8 G= 9.5 G= G= 6.5 1 Y= 6.5 1Y= Y= Y= 5.5 Y= 5.5 IY= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 1 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 305 357 64 133 561 199 1324 233 1703 292 Lane group capacity, c 286 415 351 264 737 281 1986 150 2056 833 v/c ratio, X 1.07 0.86 0.24 0.50 0.76 0.71 0.67 1.55 0.83 0.35 Total green ratio, g/C 0.39 a23 0.23 0.38 0.23 0.08 0.40 0.08 0.40 0.53 Uniform delay, d, 44.0 44.2 37.5 127.2 43.3 53.6 29.3 155.0 32.1 116.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.892 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.37 0.04 0.04 0.28 0.23 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 Incremental delay, d2 71.9 115.8 0.1 0.6 4.2 6.7 1.7 279.1 4.0 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 115.9 60.1 137.6 27.8 47.5 60.2 27.8 .334.1 36.1 16.6 Lane group LOS F E D C D E I C F D B Approach delay 80.4 43.7 32.1 64.7 Approach LOS F D C E Intersection delay 54.6 X,3 = 1.04 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright 02000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 177 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k25C.tmp 2/15/2006 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movernent EBL EB.T EBR WBL WBT INBR SEI_ SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations I T1} TT 11 T r I ll� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1727 3201 1740 3460 1770 1809 1516 1761 1657 Flt Permitted 0.34 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 627 3201 704 3460 562 1809 1516 668 1657 Volume (vph) 35 364 99 282 691 80 77 176 141 231 184 185 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 35 364 99 282 691 80 77 176 141 231 184 185 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 6 0 0 0 118 0 34 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 446 0 282 765 0 77 176 23 231 335 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 52.4 48.6 68.1 59.3 26.2 19.6 19.6 41.9 29.3 Effective Green, g (s) 52.4 48.6 68.1 59.3 27.2 19.6 19.6 41.9 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.57 0.49 0.23 0.16 0.16 0.35 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 309 1296 525 1710 204 295 248 391 405 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.14 c0.06 0.22 0.02 0.10 c0.09 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.24 0.06 0.02 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.34 0.54 0.45 0.38 0.60 0.09 0.59 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 19.5 24.7 14.2 19.7 37.9 46.5 42.6 29.9 43.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.4 2.2 0.1 1.6 12.4 Delay (s) 19.5 25.4 14.7 20.6 38.3 48.7 42.7 31.5 55.4 Level of Service B C B C D D D C E Approach Delay (s) 25.0 19.0 44.5 46.2 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 16 178 4840: SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 ---► 'mot � �-- � � � �. � � Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR: NBL NBT NBR SBL - SBT. SB.R, Lane Configurations +T+ M tT +I ++ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 4% -1 % 7% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3384 3296 3484 3392 1728 3268 1814 3507 1574 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3384 3296 3484 3392 1728 3268 1814 3507 1574 Volume (vph) 169 728 126 256 1528 180 119 322 53 163 544 341 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 169 728 126 256 1528 180 119 322 53 163 544 341 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 7 0 0 12 0 0 0 76 Lane Group Flow (vph) 169 844 0 256 1701 0 119 363 0 163 544 265 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 44.4 18.5 54.2 12.4 17.6 16.5 21.7 31.4 Effective Green, g (s) 10.2 45.9 19.0 54.7 12.9 18.1 17.0 22.2 32.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.38 0.16 0.46 0.11 0.15 0.14 0.18 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 288 1261 552 1546 186 493 257 649 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.26 0.07 c0.50 0.07 0.11 c0.09 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.59 Uniform Delay, dl 52.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 Delay (s) 54.8 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 0.67 0.46 1.10 0.64 0.74 0.63 0.84 30.7 45.9 32.6 51.3 48.7 48.6 47.2 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.12 1.00 1.00 2.8 0.2 55.6 4.9 4.6 3.7 8.9 33.6 46.1 88.3 57.9 59.1 52.3 56.1 C D F E E D E 37.1 82.8 58.8 50.4 D F E D 62.3 HCM Level of Service E 0.97 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 91.2% ICU Level of Service F 15 425 0.05 0.12 0.62 38.4 1.00 2.1 40.5 D Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 17 179 4848: S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 II2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N.,BL; NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi ttT+ tt if Vi tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 1% 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1690 4656 3276 4792 3262 3376 1484 1762 3495 1494 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1690 4656 3276 4792 3262 3376 1484 1762 3495 1494 Volume (vph) 122 975 153 344 1383 105 103 316 240 158 883 252 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 122 975 153 344 1383 105 103 316 240 158 883 252 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 7 0 0 0 182 0 0 105 Lane Group Flow (vph) 122 1110 0 344 1481 0 103 316 58 158 883 147 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 4 4 6 4 6 4 0 0 4 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.0 40.0 16.0 47.0 8.1 16.3 16.3 23.7 31.9 31.9 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 41.0 17.0 48.0 9.1 17.3 17.3 24.7 32.9 32.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.14 0.40 0.08 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 141 1591 464 1917 247 487 214 363 958 410 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.24 c0.11 c0.31 0.03 c0.09 0.09 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.70 0.74 0.77 0.42 0.65 0.27 0.44 0.92 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 54.3 34.1 49.4 31.3 52.9 48.5 45.7 41.6 42.3 35.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.66 0.66 0.93 1.01 1.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 37.8 2.6 4.4 2.4 0.4 2.1 0.2 0.3 13.6 0.2 Delay (s) 92.1 36.7 37.0 23.2 49.6 50.9 74.1 41.9 55.9 35.2 Level of Service F D D C D D E D E D Approach Delay (s) 42.1 25.8 59.1 50.2 Approach LOS D C E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 40.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.1 % ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 18 5228: SW 356 St & 21 Av SW HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NB.T NBR SBL SBT $BR Lane Configurations T+ Vi 0 il, 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 11 Grade (%) 0% -1% 0% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 1810 1778 3321 1770 1680 1777 1503 Fit Permitted 0.13 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.73 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 466 1810 811 3321 783 1680 1355 1503 Volume (vph) 393 429 2 136 794 263 62 18 34 238 59 356 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 393 429 2 136 794 263 62 18 34 238 59 356 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 25 0 0 0 185 Lane Group Flow (vph) 393 431 0 136 1028 0 62 27 0 0 297 171 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 2% 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 40.3 31.3 33.7 28.0 19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3 Effective Green, g (s) 40.3 31.3 33.7 28.0 19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.44 0.47 0.39 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 642 795 461 1304 212 455 367 407 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.24 0.02 c0.31 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.12 0.08 c0.22 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.54 0.30 0.79 0.29 0.06 0.81 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 11.1 14.7 10.9 19.0 20.6 19.3 24.3 21.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.4 0.1 3.0 0.3 0.0 11.7 0.3 Delay (s) 12.3 15.1 11.0 22.0 20.9 19.3 36.0 21.7 Level of Service B B B C C B D C Approach Delay (s) 13.8 20.8 20.2 28.2 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 71.3 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 19 181 5246: S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r Vi ti� +T tt e Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3456 1828 1540 1725 3475 3333 3311 1770 3512 1540 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3456 1828 1540 1725 3475 3333 3311 1770 3512 1540 Volume (vph) 173 381 330 170 607 33 278 404 78 50 1007 351 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 173 381 330 170 607 33 278 404 78 50 1007 351 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 153 0 3 0 0 12 0 0 0 137 Lane Group Flow (vph) 173 381 177 170 637 0 278 470 0 50 1007 214 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.2 27.5 27.5 14.0 32.3 11.1 50.9 6.6 46.4 46.4 Effective Green, g (s) 9.2 27.5 27.5 14.0 32.3 11.1 51.9 6.6 47.4 47.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.27 0.09 0.43 0.06 0.39 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 265 419 353 201 935 308 1432 97 1387 608 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.21 c0.10 0.18 c0.08 c0.14 0.03 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.91 0.50 0.85 0.68 0.90 0.33 0.52 0.73 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 53.8 45.0 40.3 51.9 39.2 53.9 22.5 55.1 30.8 25.5 Progression Factor 0.77 0.86 0.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.39 0.29 Incremental Delay, d2 3.8 20.3 0.4 25.6 1.6 27.3 0.6 1.0 1.8 0.8 Delay (s) 45.5 58.9 28.5 77.5 40.9 81.3 23.1 56.9 13.7 8.3 Level of Service D E C E D F C E B A Approach Delay (s) 44.9 48.6 44.4 13.9 Approach LOS D D D B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 34.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 20 182 5251: S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR_ NBL NB,T NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +' r Vi ;� ViVi 0 1 tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1739 1503 1786 1763 3484 3549 1761 3522 Fit Permitted 0.70 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1284 1503 589 1763 3484 3549 1761 3522 Volume (vph) 348 15 258 16 26 15 410 713 8 16 1148 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 348 15 258 16 26 15 410 713 8 16 1148 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 178 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 363 80 16 31 0 410 721 0 16 1148 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 2% 1 % 2% 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.4 36.4 35.4 35.4 12.6 62.9 2.7 51.0 Effective Green, g (s) 37.4 37.4 37.4 37.4 14.6 63.9 3.7 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.53 0.03 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 400 468 184 549 424 1890 54 1556 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.12 0.20 0.01 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm c0.28 0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.17 0.09 0.06 0.97 0.38 0.30 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 39.6 30.0 29.2 28.9 52.5 16.5 56.9 27.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 23.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 34.5 0.6 1.1 3.2 Delay (s) 62.9 30.1 29.3 28.9 84.9 17.1 58.0 30.9 Level of Service E C C C F B E C Approach Delay (s) 49.3 29.0 41.7 31.3 Approach LOS D C D C Intersection -Summary HCM Average Control Delay 39.0 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 21 183 2009 AM V11 b Alt 1 52: S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center _ 1/11/2006 * Movement EBL E$T E„BR WBL WB-T Wi3R NBj_ ow Nw S%, S.-.T SBR Lane Configurations Vi tl M tT Vi� W, ViI tti� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1% 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 3335 3262 3151 3352 4657 3385 4715 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 3335 3262 3151 3352 4657 3385 4715 Volume (vph) 165 285 28 220 227 158 108 1264 597 181 376 54 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 165 285 28 220 227 158 108 1264 597 181 376 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 109 0 0 65 0 0 14 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 165 307 0 220 276 0 108 1796 0 181 416 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 6 6 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 15.0 13.4 14.0 8.1 61.5 10.1 63.5 Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 15.0 13.4 14.0 8.1 61.5 10.1 63.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.12 0.07 0.51 0.08 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 5.0- 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 210 417 364 368 226 2387 285 2495 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.09 0.07 c0.09 0.03 c0.39 c0.05 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.79 0.74 0.60 0.75 0.48 0.75 0.64 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 51.3 50.6 50.8 51.3 53.9 23.2 53.2 14.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 16.2 5.7 1.5 5.8 0.6 2.2 3.4 0.1 Delay (s) 67.5 56.3 47.1 50.0 54.5 25.5 56.5 14.7 Level of Service E E D D D C E B Approach Delay (s) 60.2 48.9 27.1 27.1 Approach LOS E D C C Intersection Summary. HCM Average Control Delay 35.0 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 2009 AM V11 b Alt 1 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 ---* --,, "V 4- 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR -"NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +I* tt 1 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % -3% 6% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3234 1814 3479 1614 1643 1528 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3234 1814 3479 1614 1643 1528 Volume (vph) 0 1186 252 246 414 0 0 0 0 190 8 235 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1186 252 246 414 0 0 0 0 190 8 235 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1425 0 246 414 0 0 0 0 96 102 34 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Split custom Protected Phases 4 3 8 6 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 73.5 20.2 87.7 11.3 11.3 16.3 Effective Green, g (s) 73.5 20.2 87.7 11.3 11.3 17.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.17 0.73 0.09 0.09 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1981 305 2543 152 155 284 v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 c0.14 0.12 0.06 c0.06 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.81 0.16 0.63 0.66 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 16.1 48.0 4.9 52.3 52.5 44.7 Progression Factor 1.00 0.65 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 12.8 0.1 6.1 7.5 0.1 Delay (s) 18.4 43.9 9.0 58.5 59.9 44.8 Level of Service B D A E E D Approach Delay (s) 18.4 22.0 0.0 51.4 Approach LOS B C A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. 25.0 HCM Level of Service C 0.73 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 112.9% ICU Level of Service H 15 Synchro 6 Report Page 2 185 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period AM Peak Intersection S 272 St & 272 - 1-5 NS Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 AM V11 Alt 1 Pro ect ID Federal Wa_y City Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LT R Volume, V (vph) 641 684 406 851 187 11 403 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P P A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 4 2 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, I 0.714 0.714 0.238 0.238 1.000 1 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qh 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 1 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 157 10 0 183 0 Lane width 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 3 N N -2 N N -1 N N N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, NB 0 5 4 1 0 0 3 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.2 Phasing Thru & RT EB Only 03 04 NB Only 06 07 O8 Timing G= 51.0 IY= G= 39.0 G= G= G= 15.0 IY= G= G= G= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= IY= Y= DLlra110D of Analysis, T = 0,25 Cycle Lerglh, C = 120.0 _ Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 641 684 406 694 198 220 Lane group capacity, c 556 ;2596 1460 672 234 201 v/c ratio, X 1.15 .0.26 0.28 1.03 0.85 1.09 Total green ratio, g/C 0.32 a79 0.43 0.43 J 0.13 10.13 Uniform delay, d, 40.5 3.3 22.5 34.5 51.4 52.5 Progression factor, PF 0.965 .2.108 0.867 1.000 1.000 1 000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.36 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 83.2 0.2 0.1 26.1 22.8 91.0 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 Control delay 122.3 7.1 19.6 60.6 74.2 143.5 Lane group LOS F A B E I E F Approach delay 62.8 45.5 110.7 Approach LOS E D F Intersection delay 63.1 X' = 1.09 Intersection LOS E HCS200drM Copyright 0 2000 University orFlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4 if HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site informatfon Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period AM Peak Intersection S 272 St B Military Rd S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 AM V11 Alt 1 Project ID Federal Way City Center Volume and Timin2 /n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L T R L TR L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 428 633 117 121 734 119 515 624 171 58 130 84 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 1 6 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 +0.869 0.869 0.869 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 d2.O 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 46 10 0 11 10 0 1 86 10 0 75 Lane width 12.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 -3 N N 0 N N 0 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, Ns 2 3 0 0 4 4 2 3 3 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing Thru $ RT EB Only Excl. Left 04 SB Only NB Onl, 07 08 Timing G= 26.0 G= 2.0 G= 15.0 G= G= 9.7 G= 42.3 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 JY= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 1 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 428 633 71 121 842 515 624 85 58 130 9 Lane group capacity,c 320 933 1036 221 721 620 636 534 143 148 123 v/c ratio, X 1.34 0.68 0.07 0.55 1.17 0.83 0.98 0.16 0.41 0.88 0.07 Total green ratio, g/C 0.18 0.28 0.67 10.13 10.22 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.08 0.08 Uniform delay, di 49.0 38.8 6.9 49.3 47.0 35.6 36.5 26.7 52.4 54.6 51.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.151 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.08 0.50 0.34 0.48 0.04 0.04 0.39 0.04 Incremental delay, dZ 169.3 3.5 0.0 1.6 90.1 8.8 30.7 0.1 0.7 39.6 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay .218.3 42.2 0 50.9 137.1 44.4 69.2 26.7 53.1 94.1 51.1 Lane group LOS F D J�A DI F D E C D I F I D Approach delay 106.2 126.3 55.8 80.1 Approach LOS F F E F Intersection delay 92.7 Xc = 1.10 Intersection LOS F HCS2000Tt`'i Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.lf 187 file://C:\Documents and Settings\John.DOM I \Local Settings\Temp\s2k2DA.tmp 1/6/2006 2009 AM V11 b Alt 1 1651: S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT. SBR Lane Configurations if I ##t ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3305 1488 1787 4951 4901 1564 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3305 1488 1787 4951 4901 1564 Volume (vph) 876 163 153 584 495 223 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 876 163 153 584 495 223 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 79 0 0 0 56 Lane Group Flow (vph) 876 84 153 584 495 167 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10, 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages #Ihr 2 6 0 2 6 0 Turn Type Perm Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 8 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 48.5 48.5 14.1 60.0 39.9 88.4 Effective Green, g (s) 49.0 49.0 15.1 61.0 40.9 89.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.51 0.34 0.75 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1350 608 225 2517 1670 1237 v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 c0.09 0.12 c0.10 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.14 0.68 0.23 0.30 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 28.6 22.3 50.1 16.4 29.0 4.2 Progression Factor 0.89 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.89 7.16 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.0 6.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 26.2 18.9 56.7 16.7 25.9 30.1 Level of Service C B E B C C Approach Delay (s) 25.1 25.0 27.2 Approach LOS C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 25.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 5 2009 AM V11 b Alt 1 3028: SW 320 St & 21 Av SW Federal Way Citx Center * I1/11/2006 Movement EBL F_BT EB.R WBL WBT WBR N8L• NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tip t r tT. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3355 3446 3376 1760 1818 1489 1755 3159 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 3355 3446 3376 717 1818 1489 3.74 3159 Volume (vph) 366 801 123 111 262 26 209 577 414 89 265 165 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 366 801 123 111 262 26 209 577 414 89 265 165 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0 52 0 79 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 366 913 0 111 282 0 209 577 362 89 351 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 0 2 3 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 3 3 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.1 34.5 10.5 18.9 58.6 47.9 58.4 49.4 43.3 Effective Green, g (s) 26.6 35.0 10.5 18.9 59.5 48.4 58.9 49.4 43.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.29 0.09 0.16 0.50 0.40 0.49 0.41 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 396 979 302 532 453 733 731 224 1140 v/s Ratio Prot 0.20 c0.27 0.03 c0.08 c0.04 c0.32 0.04 0.02 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.20 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.93 0.37 0.53 0.46 0.79 0.50 0.40 0.31 Uniform Delay, d1 45.7 41.4 51.6 46.5 18.0 31.3 20.6 24.5 27.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.67 Incremental Delay, d2 26.6 15.0 0.3 0.5 0.3 8.4 0.2 0.3 0.6 Delay (s) 72.4 56.3 51.9 47.0 18.2 39.7 20.7 25.4 19.2 Level of Service E E D D B D C C B Approach Delay (s) 60.9 48.3 29.4 20.2 Approach LOS E D C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 42.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 6 2009 AM V11 b Alt 1 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center _ 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR- WBL WBT WBR NBL NB.T NBR SBL SBT SB.R Lane Configurations tT+ ►j tt r tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3246 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1494 3422 3424 1510 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3246 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1494 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 261 1191 220 133 267 72 56 411 290 114 360 66 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) . 261 1191 220 133 267 72 56 411 290 114 360 66 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 35 0 0 39 0 0 54 Lane Group Flow (vph) 261 1400 0 133 267 37 56 411 251 114 360 12 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1'0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 63.5 10.5 61.0 61.0 5.4 19.0 29.5 8.0 21.6 21.6 Effective Green, g (s) 12.5 63.5 10.0 61.0 61.0 4.9 19.0 29.0 7.5 21.6 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.53 0.08 0.51 0.51 0.04 0.16 0.24 0.06 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 352 1718 280 1811 789 141 550 361 214 616. 272 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.43 0.04 0.07 0.02 c0.12 c0.06 c0.03 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.11 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.81 0.48 0.15 0.05 0.40 0.75 0.70 0.53 0.58 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 52.2 23.4 52.5 15.7 14.9 56.1 48.2 41.5 54.6 45.1 40.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.58 0.77 Incremental Delay, d2 7.2 4.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.7 4.8 4.7 1.1 0.8 0.0 Delay (s) 59.4 27.8 53.0 15.9 15.0 56.8 53.0 46.1 53.0 27.0 31.2 Level of Service E C D B B E D D D C C Approach Delay (s) 32.7 26.2 50.7 33.0 Approach LOS C C D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. 35.8 HCM Level of Service 0.81 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 77.0% ICU Level of Service 15 n 25.0 D Synchro 6 Report Page 7 190 s 2009 AM V11b Alt 1 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --0 --► ---* "r 4- f- 4\ r � 1( 4/ Movement EBL EBT- EBR W.BL WBT . WBR N5L NBR SWL2 SWL SWR Lane Configurations tt r tt b Mr Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3487 1446 163 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 1587 490 197 1138 0 0 0 240 9 796 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1587 490 197 1138 0 0 0 240 9 796 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1587 335 197 1138 0 0 0 124 125 634 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 73.3 73.3 96.3 81.3 14.2 14.2 29.2 Effective Green, g (s) 73.3 73.3 96.3 81.3 13.7 13.7 28.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.80 0.68 0.11 0.11 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2130 883 374 2421 190 190 855 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 c0.08 0.32 0.07 0.08 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.38 0.53 0.47 0.65 0.66 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 16.7 11.8 26.0 9.2 50.9 50.9 42.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.07 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 1.2 0.5 0.5 6.0 6.1 3.1 Delay (s) . 19.1 13.1 28.4 6.1 56.9 57.0 45.3 Level of Service B B C A E E D Approach Delay (s) 17.7 9.4 0.0 48.1 Approach LOS B A A D Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 22.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 8 191 2009 AM V11 b Alt 1 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WSR NB.L NBT 'NBR 5BL SQT SBR Lane Configurations T r 0 )) ttT, ) tt+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1,00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1659 1792 1499 1660 3274 3368 4881 1796 5120 1548 Fit Permitted 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 572 1792 1499 318 3274 3368 4881 1796 5120 1548 Volume (vph) 136 457 190 62 375 93 405 703 74 109 368 220 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 136 457 190 62 375 93 405 703 74 109 368 220 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 133 0 21 0 0 9 0 0 0 120 Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 457 57 62 447 0 405 768 0 109 368 100 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockaqes (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 42.5 34.2 34.2 38.1 32.0 20.5 45.2 11.0 35.7 44.0 Effective Green, g (s) 45.5 35.7 35.7 40.1 33.0 21.0 45.7 11.5 36.2 46.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.28 0.18 0.38 0.10 0.30 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 306 533 446 186 900 589 1859 172 1545 593 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.26 0.02 0.14 c0.12 c0.16 c0.06 0.07 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.86 0.13 0.33 0.50 0.69 0.41 0.63 0.24 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 25.8 39.7 30.8 29.6 36.5 46.4 27.3 52.2 31.5 24.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 12.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 2.5 0.6 5.5 0.4 0.0 Delay (s) 26.2 52.2 30.8 30.0 36.7 30.6 11.7 57.7 31.9 24.4 Level of Service C D C C D C B E C C Approach Delay (s) 42.5 35.9 18.2 33.6 Approach LOS D D B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 30.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.1 % ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 9 192 2009 AM V11 b Alt 1 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EB.T EBR WBL WBT W_ BR _ $EL SET SER NWL NWT N.WR Lane Configurations 0 T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1717 3209 1746 3364 1771 1809 1534 1761 1622 Fit Permitted 0.62 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.62 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1116 3209 442 3364 724 1809 1534 1157 1622 Volume (vph) 81 643 187 81 159 55 65 169 10 70 106 182 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 643 187 81 159 55 65 169 10 70 106 182 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 32 0 0 33 0 0 0 8 0 95 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 798 0 81 181 0 65 169 2 70 193 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt W pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.7 24.1 26.7 24.1 13.8 10.3 10.3 14.0 10.4 Effective Green, g (s) 26.7 24.1 26.7 24.1 14.8 10.3 10.3 15.0 10.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.39 0.43 0.39 0.24 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 509 1255 247 1316 250 302 256 327 274 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.25 c0.01 0.05 c0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.13 0.04 0.00 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.64 0.33 0.14 0.26 0.56 0.01 0.21 0.71 Uniform Delay, d1 10.4 15.2 10.8 12.1 18.6 23.6 21.4 18.4 24.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.1 6.6 Delay (s) 10.4 17.7 11.1 12.3 18.8 24.8 21.4 18.5 30.7 Level of Service B B B B B C C B C Approach Delay (s) 17.0 12.0 23.1 28.3 Approach LOS B B C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 19.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 61.6 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 10 193 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 52: S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 � --,, � 'r � � i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB,R NBL _ ,NBT NBR $_ BL SBT $BR Lane Configurations tT+ 0 M ttT, ►j) tO Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fipb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 3250 3262 3244 3352 4614 3385 4781 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 3250 3262 3244 3352 4614 3385 4781 Volume (vph) 113 384 113 417 335 116 204 798 465 327 1102 60 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 113 384 113 417 335 116 204 798 465 327 1102 60 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 29 0 0 79 0 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 474 0 417 422 0 204 1184 0 327 1157 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blocka es #/hr) 2 2 6 6 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot _ Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 20.7 18.5 27.6 10.7 45.8 15.0 50.1 Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 20.7 18.5 27.6 10.7 45.8 15.0 50.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.17 0.15 0.23 0.09 0.38 0.12 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 169 561 503 746 299 1761 423 1996 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.15 c0.13 0.13 0.06 c0.26 c0.10 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.67 0.84 0.83 0.57 0.68 0.67 0.77 0.58 Uniform Delay, d1 52.3 48.1 49.2 40.9 53.0 30.9 50.9 26.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.5 10.8 8.2 0.5 5.0 2.1 7.8 1.2 Delay (s) 59.9 58.9 52.1 35.6 58.0 32.9 58.7 28.1 Level of Service' E E D D E C E C Approach Delay (s) 59.0 43.5 36.4 34.8 Approach LOS E D D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 40.4 _ HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 1 194 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp Federal Way City Center -A * I1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT" tt *T r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) ' 1 % -3% 6% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3163 1814 3479 1614 1642 1524 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3163 1814 3479 1614 1642 1524 Volume (vph) 0 857 286 156 426 0 0 0 0 308 10 402 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 857 286 156 426 0 0 0 0 308 10 402 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1123 0 156 426 0 0 0 0 154 164 168 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Split custom Protected Phases 4 3 8 6 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 74.5 14.7 83.0 15.8 15.8 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 74.5 14.7 83.0 15.8 15.8 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.12 0.69 0.13 0.13 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1964 222 2406 213 216 343 v/s Ratio Prot c0.36 c0.09 0.12 0.10 c0.10 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.70 0.18 0.72 0.76 0.49 Uniform Delay, d1 13.4 50.6 6.5 50.0 50.3 44.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.42 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 7.6 0.2 9.8 12.7 0.4 Delay (s) 14.6 79.6 0.6 59.8 63.0 44.4 Level of Service B E A E E D Approach Delay (s) 14.6 21.8 0.0 51.9 Approach LOS B C A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 27.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mira! Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 195 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 59: S 272 St & 272 - 1-5 NB Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1 % -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1872 1584 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1872 1584 Volume (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 417 161 14 152 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , .00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 417 161 14 152 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 81 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 297 0 175 71 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 95.3 45.3 45.3 14.7 14.7 Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 95.3 45.3 45.3 14.7 14.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.79 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 641 2599 1294 521 229 194 v/s Ratio Prot c0.28 0.19 0.11 c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.24 0.29 0.57 0.76 0.37 Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 3.2 26.1 29.6 51.0 48.4 Progression Factor 0.76 0.17 0.46 0.37 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 0.2 0.5 4.0 12.7 0.4 Delay (s) 28.1 0.7 12.5 14.9 63.7 48.8 Level of Service C A B B E D Approach Delay (s) 12.5 13.8 56.8 0.0 Approach LOS B B E A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 19.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 3 196 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 60: S 272 St & Military Rd S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 fAl- Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT. WBR NBL NBT . NBR SBL S_ BT SB.R Lane Configurations tt r +T* + r t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 3385 1500 1770 3291 1759 1804 1470 1775 1828 1523 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1748 3385 1500 1770 3291 1759 1804 1470 1775 1828 1523 Volume (vph) 87 526 215 98 539 77 302 188 78 71 213 115 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 526 215 98 539 77 302 188 78 71 213 115 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 87 0 8 0 0 0 55 0 0 98 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 526 128 98 608 0 302 188 23 71 213 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 3 0 0 4 2 4 2 3 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot pm+ov Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 46.9 71.7 10.4 47.7 24.8 35.4 35.4 7.3 17.9 17.9 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 46.9 71.7 10.4 47.7 24.8 35.4 35.4 7.3 17.9 17.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.39 0.60 0.09 0.40 0.21 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 140 1323 896 153 1308 364 532 434 108 273 227 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.16 0.03 c0.06 c0.18 c0.17 0.10 0.04 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.40 0.14 0.64 0.46 0.83 0.35 0.05 0.66 0.78 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 53.4 26.4 10.6 53.0 26.7 45.6 33.3 30.3 55.1 49.2 43.9 Progression Factor 0.93 0.89 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.9 0.9 0.0 6.7 1.2 13.8 0.1 0.0 10.5 12.5 0.1 Delay (s) 55.6 24.3 10.5 59.7 27.9 59.4 33.4 30.3 65.6 61.6 44.0 Level of Service E C B E C E C C E E D Approach Delay (s) 24.0 32.3 46.8 57.2 Approach LOS C C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 36.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 4 197 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --* --o. -,%, f- 4 '1- 4\ lr 10. 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL_ NBT NBR SBL $BT SBR Lane Configurations ti� Vi tT ) tti� ►j ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 3262 1759 3270 1759 4756 1773 4938 1532 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1764 3262 1759 3270 1759 4756 1773 4938 1532 Volume (vph) 238 432 159 288 517 183 264 1101 299 326 1151 151 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 238 432 159 288 517 183 264 1101 299 326 1151 151 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 32 0 0 29 0 0 41 0 0 0 50 Lane Group Flow (vph) 238 559 0 288 671 0 264 1359 0 326 1151 101 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 4_ 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.0 22.3 19.7 25.0 22.5 36.0 22.5 36.0 53.0 Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 22.3 19.7 25.0 22.0 36.0 22.0 36.0 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.19 0.16 0.21 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.30 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 250 606 289 681 322 1427 325 1481 0.13 c0.17 0.16 c0.21 0.15 c0.29 c0.18 0.23 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.98 0.82 0.95 1.00 0.78 51.1 48.0 50.1 47.3 47.1 41.2 49.0 38.3 0.85 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.45 0.34 1.00 1.00 41.8 18.7 51.6 30.4 5.3 6.6 50.7 4.1 85.3 60.0 101.7 77.7 26.6 20.5 99.7 42.4 F E F E C C F D 67.2 84.7 21.5 51.8 E F C D 677 0.02 0.04 0.15 20.0 1.00 0.0 20.1 C HCM Average Control Delay 50.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 5 W. HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period Saturday Intersection S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 SAT v11 Alt 1 Project ID - Vulurne and T?MiM In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 117 152 245 274 126 189 260 '1398 382 262 1353 51 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 4 2 4 4 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 0.993 9.993 0.090 10.090 0.580 0.580 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 48 10 0 44 10 0 1 41 10 0 3 Lane width 120 11.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -2 N N 0 N N 2 N N -2 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 10 4 0 0 2 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing I Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Thru & RT Excl, Left 07 08 Timing G= 11.1 G= 27.4 G= G= G= 41.5 G= 20.0 G= G= 1Y= Y= 6 Y= 4.5 Y= IY= IY= 5 Y= 4.5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB I WB NB SB L7 I TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted flow rate, v 117 349 274 271 260 1739 262 1401 Lane group capacity, c 339 376 263 376 285 1621 290 1695 v/c ratio, X 0.35 0.92 1.04 0.72 0.91 1.07 .0.90 0.83 Total green ratio, g/C 0.38 0.22 0.38 0.22 0.16 0.35 0.16 10.35 Uniform delay, d1 26.0 45.5 40.0 43.1 49.4 39.3 49.3 136.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.094 1.000 0.947 Delay calibration, k 0.04 0.43 0.50 0.24 0.42 0.50 0.41 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 0.2 27.4 66.6 5.7 14.5 34.2 19.2 12.8 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 26.2 73.0 106.6 48.8 53.9 177.1 68.5 36.9 Lane group LOS C I E F D D I E E D Approach delay 61.2 77.9 74.1 41.9 Approach LOS E E E D Intersection delay 61.8 Xc = 1.05 Intersection LOS E Hcs2000Tm Copyright ® 2000 University offlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 r 199 fileWCADocuments and Settings\John.DOMI\Local Settings\Temp\s2k210.tmp 1/6/2006 2009 SAT v11b Alt 1 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --► -t 'r '4-- ',- 4\ t' Movement FBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W-BR NBL NB.T NBR SBL SB.T SBR Lane Configurations t1+ '� tf �► � tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% _1% -1 % 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3295 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1501 3422 3424 1510 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3295 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1501 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 116 1383 114 400 1103 137 180 474 536 165 335 61 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 116 1383 114 400 1103 137 180 474 536 165 335 61 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 0 64 0 0 13 0 0 51 Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 1492 0 400 1103 73 180 474 523 165 335 10 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 54.4 17.5 63.6 63.6 10.0 19.8 37.3 9.3 19.1 19.1 Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 54.4 17.0 63.6 63.6 9.5 19.8 36.8 8.8 19.1 19.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.45 0.14 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.16 0.31 0.07 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 220 1494 475 1888 823 274 573 460 251 545 240 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.45 0.12 0.31 c0.05 0.14 c0.16 0.05 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.19 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.53 1.00 0.84 0.58 0.09 0.66 0.83 1.14 0.66 0.61 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 54.3 32.8 50.2 19.2 13.9 53.7 48.4 41.6 54.1 47.0 42.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.70 0.97 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 23.0 12.3 1.3 0.2 4.3 9.1 85.0 4.2 1.3 0.0 Delay (s) 55.4 55.7 62.5 20.5 14.1 58.0 57.5 126.6 48.3 34.3 41.4 Level of Service E E E C B E E F D C D Approach Delay (s) 55.7 30.2 88.7 39.2 Approach LOS E C F D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 53.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 7 200 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period _ Intersection S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 SAT v11 All 1 Project ID Federal Way City Center Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Nt 2 3 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 3 1 Lane group L TR L T R L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 789 1403 57 509 1078 367 223 929 275 457 969 484 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P I P A A I A A I A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.5 3.5 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 1 3.0 Arrival type, AT 4 4 1 4 5 5 4 1 4 4 5 5 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.869 0.869 0.090 0.090 10.090 0.585 0.585 0.414 0.414 0.414 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 3 10 0 129 10 0 46 10 0 230 Lane width 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -6 N N 0 N N 2 N N -2 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 1 2 6 0 6 1 2 6 1 2 1 6 1 0 1 6 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 1 3.3 1 3.3 Phasing EB 02!Z Thru & RT WB Only 04 NB Only Thru & RT I SBOny 08 Timing G= 16.5 G= 15.0 G= 15.5 G= G= 11.9 G= 14.6 G= 11.0 G= Y= 5.5 Y= 6 Y= 6.5 JY= Y= 5.5 Y= 6 Y= 6 JY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle ten th, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB I WB NB SB LT I TH RT I LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 789 1457 509 1078 238 223 1158 457 969 254 Lane group capacity, c 488 1593 447 1556 481 339 1302 321 1359 409 v/c ratio, X 1.62 0.91 1.14 0.69 0.49 0.66 0.89 1.42 0.71 0.62 Total green ratio, g/C 10.14 0.32 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.10 10.28 1 0.10 10.27 0.27 Uniform delay, di 51.5 39.4 52.0 35.9 33.2 51.8 41.7 54.3 39.5 38.3 Progression factor, PF 1.000 10.972 1.000 10.691 0.691 1.000 10.19 1.000 1.000 0.751 0.751 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.50 0.24 0.15 Incremental delay, dz 285.7 8.6 65.3 0.2 0.3 2.2 4.7 198.2 0.6 0.9 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay .337.2 46.9 117.3 25.0 23.3 53.9 46.5 252.4 30.3 29.7 Lane group LOS F D F I C I C D D I F C C Approach delay 148.9 50.5 47.7 90.6 Approach LOS F D D F Intersection delay 90.4 Xc = 1.00 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University orFloride, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1r 201 file:HCADocuments and SettinasUohn.DOMI\Local Set1:ings\Tem1As2k223.tmv 1/6/2006 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way City Center Date Performed 0111112006 Time Period 12:00 am Intersection S 320 St & 20 Av S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 SAT v1lb All 1 Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 642 1368 403 547 '1423 384 314 209 259 340 296 342 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Arrival type, AT 4 5 4 5 3 3 4 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.436 0.436 0.090 19.090 1.000 1.000 .0.977 0.977 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 44 10 0 40 10 0 37 10 0 34 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -3 N N 2 N N •1 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 0 6 0 8 8 0 6 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing WB Only Thru & RT EB Only 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 15.5 IY= G= 15.0 G= 17.0 G= IY= G= 17.0 G= 32.0 G= G= 4.5 Y= 5 IY= 5 Y= 4.5 Y= 4.5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 1 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow rate, v 642 1727 547 1767 314 431 340 604 Lane group capacity, c 484 1538 430 1418 300 455 300 445 v/c ratio, X 1.33 1.12 1.27 1.25 1.05 0.95 1.13 1.36 Total green ratio, g/C 0.14 10.31 0.13 0.29 1 0.44 10.26 0.44 0.26 Uniform delay, di 51.8 41.5 52.5 42.5 36.1 43.4 34.2 44.3 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.703 1.000 0.725 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0,50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.50 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 153.2 59.6 124.2 111.3 64.7 28.9 92.4 174.6 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 205.0 88.8 176.7 142.2 100.8 72.4 126.6 218.9 Lane group LOS F F F F F E F F Approach delay 120.3 150.3 84.3 185.6 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection delay 136.7 X� = 1.35 Intersection LOS F HCS200drM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Rmrved Version 4.1 [ 202 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst M/rai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period Saturday Intersection S 320 St & 23 Av S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 SAT v11 Alt 1 Project ID Volume and Timing /n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 0 2 3 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR R L TR Volume, V (vph) 198 1799 74 495 .2355 405 61 166 335 485 157 154 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 1, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 2.5 Arrival type, AT 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 Unit extension, UE 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, I 0.090 0.090 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.975 0.975 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 3 10 0 18 10 0 14 10 0 33 Lane width 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 111.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 5 N N -5 N N 1 N NfO N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 16 0 8 8 2 16 16 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasin EB Onl Thru & RT WB Only 04 Thru & RT SB Only Excl. Left 08 T iming G= 10.3 G= 21.8 G= 20.1 G= G= 18.9 G= 3.1 G= 13.8 G= Y= 4.5 Y= 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= 5.5 Y= 5.5 Y= 4.5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length. C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 198 1870 495 2742 61 208 279 485 278 Lane group capacity, c 273 1508 581 2071 187 275 514 593 1 394 v/c ratio, X 0.73 1.24 0.85 1.32 0.33 0.76 0.54 0.82 0.71 Total green ratio, g/C 0.08 0.31 10.16 0.41 0.11 0.16 0.37 0.18 10.23 Uniform delay, dl .53.8 41.2 48.8 35.5 49.2 48.0 29.7 47.1 142.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 10.975 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.25 0.50 0.36 0.50 0.04 0.28 0.08 0.33 0.23 Incremental delay, d2 0.8 1108.6 11.1 149.3 0.4 10.3 0.7 8.0 4,7 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 54.6 148.7 59.9 184.8 49.6 58.3 55.2 46.9 Lane group LOS D F E F D E E30.4 E I D Approach delay 139.7 165.7 43.1 1 52.2 Approach LOS F F D D Intersection delay 134.3 Xc = 1.04 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1f 203 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SIB - 320 Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --# --# "r .4--- It 41 �► / i *� Moyement . EBL EBT EBR WBL, WBT Vy R, :: NSW N.BR SWL2 SWL SW.R, Lane Configurations�� �► Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3487 1446 97 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 2144 693 157 1890 0 0 0 133 3 849 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2144 693 157 1890 0 0 0 133 3 849 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 181 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2144 512 157 1890 0 0 0 68 68 818 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 77.8 77.8 87.8 77.8 17.7 17.7 32.7 Effective Green, g (s) 77.8 77.8 87.8 77.8 17.2 17.2 32.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.73 0.65 0.14 0.14 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2261 937 212 2317 239 239- 959 v/s Ratio Prot c0.61 0.06 0.53 0.04 0.04 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.35 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.55 0.74 0.82 0.28 0.28 0.85 Uniform Delay, dl 19.3 11.5 46.6 15.7 45.9 45.9 41.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.04 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.2 2.3 8.6 2.5 0.2 0.2 7.1 Delay (s) 29.4 13.8 57.1 16.1 46.1 46.1 48.8 Level of Service C B E B D D D Approach Delay (s) 25.6 19.2 0.0 48.4 Approach LOS C B A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 27.2 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mira! Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 11 MEI 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 3058: S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --* --► --A ~ * Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR $BL SBR NEL2 NEL NER Lane Configurations 0 ? tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 3373 1434 3592 1532 1681 1620 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (perm) 3373 1434 3592 1532 1681 1620 Volume (vph) 0 1249 1034 0 1402 119 0 0 627 2 108 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1249 1034 0 1402 119 0 0 627 2 108 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 24 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1249 1034 0 1402 103 0 0 385 328 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Turn Type Free Perm Split Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.7 60.0 33.7 33.7 16.8 16.8 Effective Green, g (s) 33.7 60.0 33.7 33.7 16.3 16.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.56 0.56 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1895 1434 2018 860 457 440 v/s Ratio Prot 0.37 0.39 0.23 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm c0.72 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.72 0.69 0.12 0.84 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 9.2 0.0 9.5 6.2 20.6 20.0 Progression Factor 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.3 2.0 0.3 12.7 5.9 Delay (s) 10.1 1.3 11.5 6.5 33.4 25.9 Level of Service B A B A C C Approach Delay (s) 6.1 11.1 0.0 29.8 Approach LOS A B A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mira! Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 12 205 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Warr City Center 1/11/2006 --► 'mot it �- � � �` �. �, Movement EBL EBT E,BR WBL WBT WBR N..BL NBT NBR SBL SBT S.BR Lane Configurations T+ ttT W. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 11 11 12 - 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1696 1755 4845 1696 4891 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1696 1755 4845 1696 4891 Volume (vph) 136 176 132 323 246 84 230 1167 393 239 1175 127 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 136 176 132 323 246 84 230 1167 393 239 1175 127 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 115 0 10 0 0 48 0 0 11 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 176 17 323 320 0 230 1512 0 239 1291 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% - 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.1 16.1 16.1 19.7 24.7 20.5 46.7 19.0 45.2 Effective Green, g (s) 10.6 15.6 15.6 19.2 24.2 20.0 46.7 18.5 45.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.17 0.39 0.15 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 157 228 187 520 342 293 1886 261 1842 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.10 0.10 c0.19 0.13 c0.31 c0.14 0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.77 0.09 0.62 0.93 0.78 0.80 0.92 0.70 Uniform Delay, d1 54.0 50.5 46.0 47.0 47.1 47.9 32.5 50.0 31.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.82 Incremental Delay, d2 35.1 13.7 0.1 1.7 31.7 12.0 3.7 21.1 1.2 Delay (s) 89.1 64.2 46.0 48.7 78.8 59.9 36.2 49.5 27.2 Level of Service F E D D E E D D C Approach Delay (s) 66.4 63.9 39.3 30.7 Approach LOS E E D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 42.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 13 206 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 � _4 � - - *-- \* -x *\ IN, '�* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR $EL SET S.ER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations +T tT t r* T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1724 3241 1746 3426 1770 1809 1533 1761 1612 Fit Permitted 0.49 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 892 3241 394 3426 745 1809 1533 1213 1612 Volume (vph) 76 622 132 199 377 74 94 129 82 114 95 190 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 76 622 132 199 377 74 94 129 82 114 95 190 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 20 0 0 0 69 0 112 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 731 0 199 431 0 94 129 13 114 173 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.4 21.6 30.8 24.8 15.4 10.0 10.0 16.0 10.3 Effective Green, g (s) 24.4 21.6 30.8 24.8 16.4 10.0 10.0 17.0 10.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.34 0.48 0.39 0.26 0.16 0.16 0.26 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 "5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 375 1089 315 1321 292 281 238 378 258 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.23 c0.06 0.13 c0.03 0.07 0.03 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.24 0.05 0.01 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.67 0.63 0.33 0.32 0.46 0.05 0.30 0.67 Uniform Delay, di 13.0 18.3 11.0 13.9 19.0 24.7 23.1 18.6 25.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 3.3 3.0 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.2 5.3 Delay (s) 13.0 21.6 14.0 14.5 19.3 25.1 23.2 18.8 30.7 Level of Service B C B B B C C B C Approach Delay (s) 20.8 14.4 22.8 27.3 Approach LOS C B C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.3 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 14 207 Blank Appendix K. 2009 Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 1 — Mitigated Attached are the 2009 intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for Alternative 1 intersections that required mitigation actions. Analysis of the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours used the Synchro 6.0 (Build 612) analysis software to report the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) intersection operations. Where intersections exceeded the City's Level of Service threshold of LOS E or a volume -to -capacity ratio of less than 1.0, results were exported from Synchro to the Highway Capacity Software (version 4.1f). Documents: 1. 2009 PM Peak Hour HCM results — Mitigated Intersections 2. 2009 AM Peak Hour HCM results — (Note: No Mitigated Intersections) 3. 2009 Saturday Peak Hour HCM results — Mitigated Intersections 209 Blank 210 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 - MIT 2/17/2006 EBL . EBT . EBR WBL RMT, W-MR:.- NRL . A,8,.T -NBR 'SBL' _SBT. _ SBf Lane Configurations I +1. +1' )) ++T ) ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 3281 1759 3261 3439 4853 1773 4938 1530 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1764 3281 1759 3261 3439 4853 1773 4938 1530 Volume (vph) 260 408 127 247 539 205 299 905 109 289 1651 347 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 260 408 127 247 539 205 299 905 109 289 1651 347 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 33 0 0 12 0 0 0 14 Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 510 0 247 711 0 299 1002 0 289 1651 333 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.6 21.8 23.8 27.0 11.5 32.8 22.1 43.4 62.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.6 21.8 23.8 27.0 11.0 32.8 21.6 43.4 62.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.09 0.27 0.18 0.36 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 273 596 349 734 315 1326 319 1786 791 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.16 0.14 c0.22 c0.09 0.21 0.16 c0.33 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.86 0.71 0.97 0.95 0.76 0.91 0.92 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 50.3 47.6 44.9 46.1 54.2 39.9 48.2 36.7 17.9 Progression Factor 0.91 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 39.5 10.5 5.3 25.3 31.5 3.2 27.2 9.6 0.1 Delay (s) 85.0 52.2 50.1 71.4 73.3 30.9 75.4 46.3 18.0 Level of Service F D D E E C E D B Approach Delay (s) 62.9 66.1 40.6 45.7 Approach LOS E E D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 50.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 7 211 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 1 - MIT II2/17/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r tTo� M +tT+ '� ttt if Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1661 1792 1499 1657 3173 3368 4941 1796 5120 1552 Fit Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 231 1792 1499 665 3173 3368 4941 1796 5120 1552 Volume (vph) 305 357 260 133 400 237 199 1286 40 233 1703 337 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 305 357 260 133 400 237 199 1286 40 233 1703 337 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 174 0 77 0 0 3 0 0 0 44 Lane Group Flow (vph) 305 357 86 133 560 0 199 1323 0 233 1703 293 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 32.4 32.4 32.9 24.3 9.3 39.2 16.3 46.2 62.9 Effective Green, g (s) 48.5 33.9 33.9 34.9 25.3 9.8 39.7 16.8 46.7 64.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.21 0.08 0.33 0.14 0.39 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 310 506 423 273 669 275 1635 251 1993 839 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.20 0.04 0.18 0.06 0.27 c0.13 c0.33 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 0.06 0.10 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.71 0.20 0.49 0.84 0.72 0.81 0.93 0.85 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 34.5 38.6 32.8 33.1 45.4 53.8 36.7 51.0 33.5 15.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 46.3 3.6 0.1 0.5 8.6 7.5 4.3 37.0 4.9 0.1 Delay (s) 80.8 42.2 32.8 33.6 54.0 52.8 27.7 88.0 38.5 15.7 Level of Service F D C C D D C F D B Approach Delay (s) 52.3 50.5 31.0 40.2 Approach LOS D D C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 41.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 15 212 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 -MITI b 2750: S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 2/23/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR• WBL WBT WBR NR, NBT NBR 5BL 5BT -5BR Lane Configurations t r T+ ) tti� I ttl� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1808 1855 1556 1717 1642 1752 4658 1787 4900 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1808 1855 1556 1717 1642 1752 4658 1787 4900 Volume (vph) 117 152 245 274 126 189 260 1398 382 262 1353 51 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 117 152 245 274 126 189 260 1398 382 262 1353 51 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 213 0 48 0 0 38 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 152 32 274 267 0 260 1742 0 262 1401 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockaqes (#/hr) 2 0 4 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Prot 7 9.5 10.5 0.09 6.0 2.0 4 16.0 15.5 0.13 4.5 2.0 Perm 4 16.0 15.5 0.13 4.5 2.0 Prot 3 17.0 18.0 0.15 6.0 2.0 8 23.5 23.0 0.19 4.5 2.0 Prot 5 22.3 21.8 0.18 4.5 2.0 2 50.5 50.5 0.42 5.0 2.0 Prot 1 16.5 16.0 0.13 4.5 2.0 6 44.7 44.7 0.37 5.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 240 201 258 315 318 1960 238 1825 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.08 c0.16 c0.16 0.15 c0.37 c0.15 0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.63 0.16 1.06 0.85 0.82 0.89 1.10 0.77 Uniform Delay, dl 53.4 49.6 46.4 51.0 46.8 47.2 32.2 52.0 33.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.07 1.05 0.69 0.68 0.58 0.37 Incremental Delay, d2 15.0 4.0 0.1 73.2 17.9 6.3 2.8 78.5 2.2 Delay (s) 68.4 53.5 46.6 127.7 67.1 38.9 24.6 108.7 14.6 Level of Service E D D F E D C F B Approach Delay (s) 53.6 95.3 26.4 29.4 Approach LOS D F C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.8 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 6 213 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 - MIT1 b 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Wav Citv Center II2/23/2006 --* --* f- 4-- t t Movement EBI_ EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL . SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ++T, )) Ttt r )) ftt r )) W r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3438 5038 3351 4925 1499 3278 4902 1458 3344 5014 1487 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3438 5038 3351 4925 1499 3278 4902 1458 3344 5014 1487 Volume (vph) 789 1403 57 509 1078 367 223 929 275 457 969 484 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 789 1403 57 509 1078 367 223 929 275 457 969 484 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 0 162 0 0 177 0 0 242 Lane Group Flow (vph) 789 1457 0 509 1078 205 223 929 98 457 969 242 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 41.0 16.5 36.5 36.5 12.0 28.0 28.0 11.5 27.5 27.5 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 42.0 17.0 38.0 38.0 12.5 29.0 29.0 12.0 28.5 28.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.35 0.14 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.24 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 602 1763 475 1560 475 341 1185 352 334 1191 353 v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 c0.29 c0.15 0.22 0.07 c0.19 c0.14 c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.07 0.16 v/c Ratio 1.31 0.83 1.07 0.69 0.43 0.65 0.78 0.28 1.37 0.81 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 49.5 35.7 51.5 35.9 32.5 51.7 42.6 37.0 54.0 43.2 41.7 Progression Factor 0.85 0.74 0.59 0.44 0.26 0.48 0.38 0.33 1.04 0.60 0.30 Incremental Delay, d2 150.0 4.0 48.2 1.1 1.2 1.9 1.8 0.1 177.4 2.6 2.7 Delay (s) 192.0 30.6 78.6 17.0 9.8 26.6 17.9 12.2 233.6 28.7 15.3 Level of Service F C E B A C B B F C B Approach Delay (s) 87.2 31.7 18.2 74.4 Approach LOS F C B E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 56.5 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 8 214 l l 3 3 1 1 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 - MIT1 b 3052: S 320 St & 20 Av S Federal Way City Center II4/14/2006 Movement EBLT . EBR WBL. WBT WB.R : N.L. NET NBR: SDI_ SBT SCR Lane Configurations tti� M tti t r t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 2% _1% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3519 4957 3432 4829 1736 1891 1522 1705 1846 1524 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3519 4957 3432 4829 375 1891 1522 652 1846 1524 Volume (vph) 642 1368 403 547 1423 384 314 209 259 340 296 342 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 642 1368 403 547 1423 384 314 209 259 340 296 342 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 44 0 0 41 0 0 0 186 0 0 243 Lane Group Flow (vph) 642 1727 0 547 1766 0 314 209 73 340 296 99 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 8 0 8 0 6 6 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.5 43.5 20.5 42.5 36.0 20.0 20.0 37.5 20.0 20.0 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 43.5 20.0 42.5 36.5 19.5 19.5 36.5 19.5 19.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.36 0.17 0.35 0.30 0.16 0.16 0.30 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 6.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 616 1797 572 1710 307 307 247 347 300 248 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 c0.35 0.16 c0.37 c0.14 0.11 0.14 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.05 0.16 0.07 v/c Ratio 1.04 0.96 0.96 1.03 1.02 0.68 0.30 0.98 0.99 0.40 Uniform Delay, d1 49.5 37.4 49.6 38.7 37.1 47.3 44.2 38.4 50.1 45.0 Progression Factor 0.71 0.60 0.91 0.29 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.93 0.74 Incremental Delay, d2 39.3 9.4 11.0 21.1 57.3 4.9 0.2 41.7 47.2 0.4 Delay (s) 74.3 31.7 55.9 32.4 94.4 52.2 44.5 76.2 94.0 33.9 Level of Service E C E C F D D E F C Approach Delay (s) 43.1 37.9 66.6 66.8 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 47.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 i►4iR 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 1 - MIT1 b 3055: S 320 St & 23 Av S Federal Way City Center 4/14/2006 --* --io. I # `* '/ EB.L EBT EBR WBL WB,T W.B. 5BL Lane Configurations 11 ffi� )) ttt r t rr '� 1� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3334 4818 3554 5208 1576 1688 1760 2540 3244 1663 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3334 4818 3554 5208 1576 1688 1760 2540 3244 1663 Volume (vph) 198 1799 74 495 2355 405 61 166 335 485 157 154 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 198 1799 74 495 2355 405 61 166 335 485 157 154 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 0 61 0 0 12 0 33 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 198 1870 0 495 2355 344 61 166 323 485 278 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.7 40.5 21.5 51.3 51.3 10.4 17.2 38.7 20.3 27.1 Effective Green, g (s) 10.2 41.5 21.0 52.3 52.3 9.9 17.7 38.7 19.8 27.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.35 0.18 0.44 0.44 0.08 0.15 0.32 0.16 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 6.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 283 1666 622 2270 687 139 260 819 535 382 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.39 0.14 c0.45 0.04 c0.09 0.07 c0.15 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.70 1.12 0.80 1.04 0.50 0.44 0.64 0.39 0.91 0.73 Uniform Delay, dl 53.4 39.2 47.4 33.8 24.4 52.4 48.1 31.6 49.2 42.7 Progression Factor 0.79 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Incremental Delay, d2 2.8 59.3 6.5 29.4 2.6 0.8 3.8 0.1 18.2 5.6 Delay (s) 45.3 85.1 54.0 63.3 27.0 53.2 51.9 31.7 64.8 47.2 Level of Service D F D E C D D C E D Approach Delay (s) 81.3 57.4 40.0 57.9 Approach LOS F E D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 63.4 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 } f Appendix L. 2009 Baseline Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 2 Attached are the 2009 intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for Alternative 2 intersections. Analysis of the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours used the Synchro 6.0 (Build 612) analysis software to report the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) intersection operations. Where intersections exceeded the City's Level of Service threshold of LOS E or a volume -to -capacity ratio of less than 1.0, results were exported from Synchro to the Highway Capacity Software (version 4.1f). Documents: 1. 2009 PM Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline 2. 2009 AM Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline 3. 2009 Saturday Peak Hour HCM results — Baseline 217 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 Pm Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S All other areas 2009 PM Alt 2 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 0 2 3 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 81 354 170 960 1257 49 158 826 484 266 1871 8 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 0.891 0.891 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 48 10 0 15 10 0 88 10 0 1 Lane width 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N 3 N N -2 N N 2 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 2 6 0 0 2 2 6 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 1 3.3 3.3 Phasing Thru & RT Excl. Left 03 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 Timing G= 20.1 G= 25.9 IY= G= I G= G= 10.9 G= 43.1 G= G= 5 ]Y= Y= IY= IY= 5 Y= 5 1Y= ly= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 -5 Cycle Length. C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow rate, v 81 476 960 291 158 1222 266 1878 Lane group capacity, c 377 545 705 560 305 1684 308 1729 v/c ratio, X 0.21 0.87 1.36 0.52 0.52 0.73 0.86 1.09 Total green ratio, g/C 0.22 1 0.17 0.22 0.17 0.09 0.36 0.09 0.36 Uniform delay, di 38.7 48.7 47.0 45.5 52.0 33.3 53.8 38.5 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.04 -0.38 0.50 0.06 0.06 0.50 0.37 0.50 Incremental delay, dz 0.1 14.0 '170.9 0.4 0.7 2.8 20.7 49.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 38.8 62.7 218 00 45.9 52.8 36.1 74.5 87.6 Lane group LOS D E F D D D E F Approach delay 59.3 177.9 38.0 86.0 Approach LOS E F D F Intersection delay 92.3 Xc = 1.09 Intersection LOS F HCS2006TM Copyright ®2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 218 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\jolin.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k2C8.tmp 2/15/2006 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 PM Alt 2 Project ID Volume and Timingr Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, NI 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Lane group TR L T L LT R Volume, V (vph) 685 406 656 610 701 44 655 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 2 2 12 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) P P A P A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, I 1,000 0.460 0.460 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qh 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 72 0 10 0 32 Lane width 11.0 12.0 11.0 111.0 11.0 112..0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N -3 N N N N 1 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, N. 5 0 4 3 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.2 3.3 EB Only Thru & RT WB Onl 04 SB Onl 06 07 08 fsing ng G= 21.6 G= 31.6 G= 17.0 G= G= 28.8 G= G= IY= G= 1Y= Y= 6 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted flow rate, v 1019 656 610 358 387 623 Lane group capacity, c 1594 257 1557 408 416 727 v/c ratio, X 0.64 2.55 0.39 0.88 0.93 0.86 Total green ratio, g/C 0.49 0.14 10.45 1 0.24 0.24 0.47 Uniform delay, di 22.5 51.5 22.3 43.9 44.6 12&2 Progression factor, PF 1,000 1.000 .0.841 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.39 0.44 0.37 Incremental delay, d2 2.0 703.9 0.3 118.4 27.0 9.5 Initial queue delay, d3 10.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 24.5 755.4 19.1 62.3 71.7 37.7 Lane group LOS C F B E E D Approach delay 24.5 400.6 53.7 Approach LOS C F D Intersection delay 165.8 X� = 1.03 Intersection LOS F HCS200em Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version 4. If 219 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k2EA.tmp 2/15/2006 2009 Alt 2 59: S 272 St & 272 - 1-5 NB Ramp Federal Way CC 02 6/6/2006 ■-- t M.averRopt EBL EBB ESR. 013L,. ;.WPT. 1J21j�13 -:11(i ;-•r,'=,. 3 f Es1� SB,L SB;�. SCR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1 % -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1 _00 0.92 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1473 1878 1604 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1710 3272 34_28 1473 1878 1.6_04_ Volume (vph) 264 1375 _ _ _ 0 0 1022 _ 628 309 51 375 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 264 1375 0 0 1022 628 309 51 375 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 137 0 0 34 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 264 1375 0 0 1022 491 0 360 341 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 35.8 19.8 19.8 14.2 14.2 Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 35.8 19.8 19.8 14.2 14.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.60 0.33 0.33 0.24 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 314 1952 1131 486 444 380 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.42 0.30 0.19 v/s Ratio Perm c0.33 c0.21 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.70 0.90 1.01 0.81 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 23.7 8.4 19.2 20.1 21.6 22.2 Progression Factor 1.12 1.01 1.45 2.17 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.9 1.5 1.3 14.6 10.2 22.5 Delay (s) 39.4 10.0 29.1 58.2 31.8 44.7 Level of Service D B C E C D Approach Delay (s) 14.7 40.2 38.4 0.0 Approach LOS B D D A Inte.rsection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. 29.5 0.85 60.0 101.7% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service C 10.0 G Synchro 6 Report Page 1 220 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID S 272 St & Military Rd S All other areas 2009 PM Alt 2 Volume and Timing input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L T R L TR L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 311 799 438 223 1457 102 194 215 67 105 558 210 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.654 0.654 0.654 1.000 1.000 1.000 11,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 102 10 0 4 10 0 45 10 0 133 Lane width 12.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade I Parking N -3 N N 0 N N 0 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, NB 2 3 0 0 4 4 2 3 3 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Thru & RT WB Only Excl. Left 04 Excl. Left Thru & RT 07 08 -Phasing Timing G= 29.3 IY= G= 7.0 G= 10.0 G= G= 9.7 G= 39.0 G= G= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 311 799 336 223 194 215 22 105 558 77 Lane group capacity, c 146 828 502 325 F1555 142 586 492 143 594 509 v/c ratio, X 2.13 0.96 0.67 0.69 1.37 0.37 0.04 0.73 0.94 0.15 Total green ratio, g/C 10.08 0.24 0.32 0.18 0.34 1 0.08 10.32 0.32 10.08 0.32 0.32 Uniform delay, d, 55.0 44.8 34.9 45.8 39.3 55.2 31.0 27.7 53.9 39.4 28.8 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.965 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.20 0.21 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.26 0.44 10.04 Incremental delay, d2 .523.3 18.2 1.8 4.9 160.1 203.2 0.1 0.0 15.7 22.8 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay ,578.3 163.0 35.6 50.7 199.5 .258.3 31.2 27.8 69.6 62.1 28.8 Lane group LOS F E D D F F C C E E C Approach delay 167.5 180.8 133.2 59.7 Approach LOS F F F E Intersection delay 151.4 Xc = 1•27 Intersection LOS F HCS2000rM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved version 4.11 221 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k2D9.tmp 2/15/2006 1050: S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S 2009 PM Alt 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2/14/2006 --r �--- � * I Imo► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W13R NSL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + 1� ) +0 )1 ++1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 15 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1816 3545 1587 1805 4907 3432 5024 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1816 3545 1587 1805 4907 3432 5024 Volume (vph) 30 31 26 546 24 228 41 976 389 392 2352 43 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 30 31 26 546 24 228 41 976 389 392 2352 43 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 183 0 0 60 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 73 0 546 69 0 41 1305 0 392 2394 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 6 6 0 2 0 2 0 0 6 0 Turn Type Split Split Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.1 21.7 21.7 1.5 37.4 23.8 59.7 Effective Green, g (s) 12.1 23.7 23.7 3.0 38.9 25.3 61.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.32 0.21 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 183 700 313 45 1591 724 2562 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.15 0.04 0.02 c0.27 0.11 c0.48 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.40 0.78 0.22 0.91 0.82 0.54 0.93 Uniform Delay, d1 50.5 45.7 40.4 58.4 37.3 42.2 27.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.76 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 5.2 0.1 96.6 4.7 0.4 7.9 Delay (s) 51.0 50.9 40.5 146.2 33.0 42.6 35.4 Level of Service D D D F C D D Approach Delay (s) 51.0 47.6 36.3 36.4 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 5 222 2009 Alt 2 1056: S 288 St & Military Rd S Federal Way CC v12 6/6/2006 Movement EBl_ EB I' EBR . VVBL WQf- 1. L NF3:T .nNBR. SSL 'SBT Lane Configurations ' M ti t if I Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 1817 3327 3328 3189 1760 1777 1524 1799 1846 1583 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.48 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1817 3327 3328 3189 892 1777 1524 443 1846 1583 Volume (vph) 123 351 150 298 493 140 153 284 171 332 497 186 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 123 351 150 298 493 140 153 284 171 332 497 186 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 39 0 0 21 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 462 0 298 612 0 153 284 49 332 497 186 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.1 18.2 11.1 22.2 20.8 20.8 20.8 28.3 28.3 28.3 Effective Green, g (s) 7.1 18.2 11.1 22.2 21.3 21.3 21.3 28.8 28.8 28.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.22 0.13 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 157 736 449 860 275 460 394 348 646 554 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.14 c0.09 c0.19 0.03 c0.16 c0.14 0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.03 c0.20 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.63 0.66 0.71 0.56 0.62 0.13 0.95 0.77 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 36.8 29.0 33.8 27.2 27.3 26:9 23.4 22.7 23.8 19.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 20.6 1.2 2.9 2.3 1.4 1.7 0.1 35.8 5.0 0.1 Delay (s) 57.4 30.2 36.7 29.5 28.7 28.6 23.4 58.5 28.8 19.8 Level of Service E C D C C C C E C B Approach Delay (s) 35.6 31.8 27.2 36.9 Approach LOS D C C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33.3 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 82.3 Sum of lost=time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 223 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 PM Alt 2 Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH IRT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 1 3 1 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 259 411 126 247 545 206 300 901 110 291 1633 347 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 1.5 2.0 1 1.5 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extan.sion, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.937 10.937 1.000 1.000 19.795 0.795 1.000 1.000 11.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 25 10 0 32 10 0 12 10 0 30 Lane width 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 111.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, Ne 2 2 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 SB Only Thru & RT NB Onl 08 7ng G= 14.0 G= 2.3 IY= G= 17.7 G= G= 16.5 G= 20.0 G= 20.0 IY= G= Y= 5 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 4.5 Y= 5 5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length. C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 259 512 247 719 300 999 291 1633 317 Lane group capacity, c 206 589 259 687 286 1824 236 1683 715 v/c ratio, X 1.26 0.87 0.95 1.05 1.05 0.55 1.23 0.97 0.44 Total green ratio, g/C 0.12 0.18 0.15 0.21 0.16 0.38 0.13 0.34 0.46 Uniform delay, di 53.0 48.0 50.7 47.5 50.3 29.5 52.0 38.9 22.1 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.920 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 10.50 0.38 0.46 0.50 10.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 Incremental delay, dz 147.2 12.0 42.8 47.1 160.9 0.9 1136.0 15.9 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 200.2 60.0 93.6 194.6 111.1 28.1 188.0 54.8 22.3 Lane group LOS F E F F F C F D C Approach delay 107.1 94.4 47.3 67.5 Approach LOS F F D E Intersection delay 73.2 Xc = 1.05 Intersection LOS E HCS2000TM Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 224 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k2A6.tmp 2/15/2006 2557: S 312 St & 28 Av S HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 II2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT FBR WBL WBT WBR NBL, NB7 NEAR 5BL 5BT $BR Lane Configurations 4 4� *T* *' r Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 352 0 41 0 0 0 60 214 0 0 177 315 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 352 0 41 0 0 0 60 214 0 0 177 315 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB..1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) 393 0 274 177 315 Volume Left (vph) 352 0 60 0 0 Volume Right (vph) 41 0 0 0 315 Hadj (s) 0.13 0.00 0.06 0.02 -0.68 Departure Headway (s) 5.9 6.8 6.0 6.2 5.5 Degree Utilization, x 0.65 0.00 0.46 0.31 0.48 Capacity (veh/h) 583 437 557 551 623 Control Delay (s) 19.1 9.8 14.1 10.8 12.4 Approach Delay (s) 19.1 0.0 14.1 11.8 Approach LOS C A B B Intersection Summary Delay 14.8 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 225 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR. WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT _ NB,R SBL . SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1) 0 ++ if 1) ++ if Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3234 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1506 3422 3424 1510 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3234 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1506 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 123 683 146 341 1183 169 294 511 313 155 520 201 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 123 683 146 341 1183 169 294 511 313 155 520 201 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 0 80 0 0 23 0 0 165 Lane Group Flow (vph) 123 814 0 341 1183 89 294 511 290 155 520 36 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.6 35.8 31.5 58.7 58.7 12.2 24.6 56.1 9.1 21.5 21.5 Effective Green, g (s) 8.1 35.8 31.0 58.7 58.7 11.7 24.6 55.6 8.6 21.5 21.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.30 0.26 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.20 0.46 0.07 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 228 965 867 1743 759 337 712 698 245 613 271 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.25 0.10 c0.33 c0.09 c0.15 0.11 0.05 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.09 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.84 0.39 0.68 0.12 0.87 0.72 0.42 0.63 0.85 0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 54.1 39.5 36.7 23.4 16.6 53.4 44.5 21.4 54.2 47.7 41.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.78 1.20 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 8.9 0.1 2.1 0.3 20.6 2.9 0.1 3.7 9.8 0.1 Delay (s) 55.4 48.4 36.8 25.6 16.9 74.0 47.4 21.5 55.7 46.9 49.6 Level of Service E D D C B E D C E D D Approach Delay (s) 49.3 27.0 47.1 49.1 Approach LOS D C D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 40.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20..0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 8 226 3050: S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 t 1 ■-- 4Q I i Movement EBL EBT EBR WSL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttf, )) Ttt r M W. )) ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3438 4974 3351 4925 1499 3278 4725 3344 5014 1487 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3438 4974 3351 4925 1499 3278 4725 3344 5014 1487 Volume (vph) 397 869 111 394 1086 268 229 835 220 352 1226 487 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 397 869 111 394 1086 268 229 835 220 352 1226 487 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 177 0 41 0 0 0 183 Lane Group Flow (vph) 397 967 0 394 1086 91 229 1014 0 352 1226 304 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 39.4 Effective Green, g (s) 13.5 40.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.34 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 387 �1675 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.19 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.03 Uniform Delay, d1 53.2 Progression Factor 0.80 Incremental Delay, d2 41.7 Delay (s) 84.3 Level of Service F Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection S.ummary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC 02 Mirai Associates, Inc. 8 6 13.5 39.4 39.4 12.4 28.7 15.4 31.7 31.7 14.0 40.9 40.9 12.9 29.7 15.9 32.7 32.7 0.12 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.25 0.13 0.27 0.27 5.5 6.5 6.5 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 391 1679 511 352 1169 443 1366 405 c0.12 c0.22 0.07 c0.21 0.11 c0.24 0.06 0.20 0.58 1.01 0.65 0.18 0.65 0.87 0.79 0.90 0.75 32.8 53.0 33.4 27.8 51.4 43.3 50.5 42.0 39.9 0.59 0.61 0.40 0.30 0.76 0.98 0.98 0.98 1.00 0.9 40.5 1.4 0.5 2.2 4.6 5.7 5.1 4.3 20.3 72.6 14.8 8.8 41.3 46.9 55.0 46.3 44.2 C E B A D D E D D 38.8 26.9 45.9 47.3 D C D D 39.7 HCM Level of Service D 0.91 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 89.5% ICU Level of Service E 15 Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 9 227 3055: S 320 St & 23 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBC NBT NBR SBL . SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ++T )) t" T+ '+ ? 1� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 0.85 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3334 4819 3554 5108 1688 1564 1325 3244 1729 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3334 4819 3554 5108 1688 1564 1325 3244 1729 Volume (vph) 84 1142 45 286 1526 181 93 147 404 430 183 72 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 84 1142 45 286 1526 181 93 147 404 430 183 72 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 10 0 0 19 10 0 12 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 1184 0 286 1697 0 93 215 307 430 243 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.4 38.0 22.4 54.0 10.8 19.8 42.2 19.3 28.3 Effective Green, g (s) 5.9 39.0 21.9 55.0 10.3 20.3 42.2 18.8 28.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.32 0.18 0.46 0.09 0.17 0.35 0.16 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 164 1566 649 2341 145 265 521 508 415 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.25 0.08 c0.33 0.06 c0.14 0.11 c0.13 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.76 0.44 0.72 0.64 0.81 0.59 0.85 0.59 Uniform Delay, d1 55.6 36.2 43.6 26.4 53.1 48.0 31.8 49.2 40.3 Progression Factor 0.74 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 3.4 0.2 2.0 7.1 16.1 1.1 11.6 1.3 Delay (s) 42.0 35.4 43.8 28.4 60.1 64.1 32.9 62.6 43.4 Level of Service D D D C E E C E D Approach Delay (s) 35.9 30.6 48.2 55.4 Approach LOS D C D E Intersection_ Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 10 P401.4:j 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SWL2 SWL SWR Lane Configurations tt r V1 tt M Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3487 1446 150 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 1547 738 155 1359 0 0 0 472 25 1017 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1547 738 155 1359 0 0 0 472 25 1017 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1547 495 155 1359 0 0 0 248 249 966 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 70.0 70.0 80.0 70.0 25.5 25.5 40.5 Effective Green, g (s) 70.0 70.0 80.0 70.0 25.0 25.0 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.67 0.58 0.21 0.21 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2034 844 236 2085 347 347 1191 v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 0.05 0.38 0.15 0.15 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.34 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.59 0.66 0.65 0.71 0.72 0.81 Uniform Delay, d1 18.7 15.8 35.8 16.8 44.2 44.2 36.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 3.0 4.1 1.3 5.7 5.8 4.1 Delay (s) 21.5 18.8 39.0 12.4 49.9 50.0 40.6 Level of Service C B D B D D D Approach Delay (s) 20.6 15.1 0.0 43.7 Approach LOS C B A D Intersection Summary. HCM Average Control Delay 25.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 11 229 3064: S 320 St & Military Rd S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 -' -. f- '- 4-- -N T 1 Movement EBL EST EBR. WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR $BL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ r +T+ + ? t Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1755 3421 1518 1770 3308 1755 1786 1556 1770 1801 1540 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1755 3421 1518 1770 3308 1755 1786 1556 1770 1801 1540 Volume (vph) 218 1193 241 220 973 182 109 123 99 185 274 206 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 218 1193 241 220 973 182 109 123 99 185 274 206 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 121 0 11 0 0 0 76 0 0 115 Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 1193 120 220 1144 0 109 123 23 185 274 91 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 46.2 46.2 20.1 56.3 11.6 17.5 17.5 16.2 22.1 22.1 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 46.2 46.2 20.1 56.3 11.6 17.5 17.5 16.2 22.1 22.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.17 0.47 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 146 1317 584 296 1552 170 260 227 239 332 284 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.35 0.12 c0.35 0.06 0.07 c0.10 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.01 0.06 v/c Ratio 1.49 0.91 0.21 0.74 0.74 0.64 0.47 0.10 0.77 0.83 0.32 Uniform Delay, d1 55.0 34.8 24.6 47.5 25.8 52.2 47.0 44.4 50.1 47.1 42.4 Progression Factor 0.88 0.81 0.34 0.97 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 253.2 10.1 0.8 7.5 2.8 6.1 0.5 0.1 13.2 14.6 0.2 Delay (s) 301.6 38.3 9.2 53.7 26.5 58.3 47.5 44.5 63.4 61.7 42.7 Level of Service F D A D C E D D E E D Approach Delay (s) 68.8 30.8 50.1 56.3 Approach LOS E C D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 52.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 12 230 l 1 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 l -} Movement - EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W6.R N.SL NBT, ..N5R SBL SBT $BR Lane Configurations I f r M T _ ttT I++1* Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% 0% ' 1 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1699 1755 4886 1696 4941 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1699 1755 4886 1696 4941 Volume (vph) 76 235 188 398 243 79 210 1093 288 205 1521 69 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 76 235 188 398 243 79 210 1093 288 205 1521 69 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 160 0 11 0 0 40 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 235 28 398 311 0 210 1341 0 205 1587 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 1 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0_ 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type _ Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.9 18.6 18.6 19.5 30.2 12.5 41.1 22.3 50.9 Effective Green, g (s) 7.4 18.1 18.1 19.0 29.7 12.0 41.1 21.8 50.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.25 0.10 0.34 0.18 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 110 264 218 514 421 176 1673 308 2096 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.13 0.12 c0.18 c0.12 c0.27 0.12 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.89 0.13 0.77 0.74 1.19 0.80 0.67 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 55.2 50.0 44.1 48.4 41.6 54.0 35.8 45.7 29.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.41 0.29 Incremental Delay, d2 14.0 28.2 0.1 6.5 5.8 129.4 4.2 2.0 1.2 Delay (s) 69.2 78.2 44.2 55.0 47.4 183.4 39.9 66.3 9.7 Level of Service E E D D D F D E A Approach Delay (s) 64.0 51.6 58.8 16.1 Approach LOS E D E B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 41.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 13 231 4028: SW 336th St & 21 Av SW HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 ---* -I,. --�' f '- *-- -N T t Movement EBL EBT_ EBR WBL, WBT W.BR NBL NBT NB,R SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi tT+ tt Vi tl� I tT Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1754 3279 1771 3272 1741 3297 1791 3359 Fit Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.19 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 183 3279 451 3272 229 3297 364 3359 Volume (vph) 276 571 124 298 972 274 214 539 122 274 675 161 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 276 571 124 298 972 274 214 539 122 274 675 161 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 21 0 0 17 0 0 18 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 276 680 0 298 1225 0 214 644 0 274 818 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 1 1 4 1 4 1 2 2 1 4 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 54.3 39.3 53.7 39.0 41.0 31.0 43.0 32.0 Effective Green, g (s) 56.3 40.3 55.7 40.0 43.0 32.0 45.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.34 0.46 0.33 0.36 0.27 0.38 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 295 1101 382 1091 221 879 279 924 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.21 0.10 c0.37 0.09 0.20 c0.10 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 0.26 0.26 c0.27 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.62 0.78 1.12 0.97 0.73 0.98 0.89 Uniform Delay, dl 53.5 33.4 22.3 40.0 31.0 40.1 31.6 41.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 35.1 0.7 9.2 67.5 50.7 5.4 48.5 12.2 Delay (s) 88.5 34.1 31.5 107.5 81.7 45.5 80.2 53.8 Level of Service F C C F F D F D Approach Delay (s) 49.6 92.8 54.3 60.3 Approach LOS D F D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 68.0 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.7% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 14 232 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way CC v12 Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period 5:00 pm Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S All other areas 2009 PM Alt 2 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 3 0 1 3 1 Lane group L T R L TR L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 308 353 260 131 401 236 200 1283 38 230 1685 339 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P I A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.0 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.5 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.972 0.972 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Q. 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 178 10 0 75 10 0 2 10 0 44 Lane width 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 N N 1 N N 3 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 6 0 6 6 2 2 6 0 1 6 1 2 Min. time for pedestrians, G. 3.3 3.3 1 3.3 3.3 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 1 04 1 Thru & RT Excl. Left 07 08 Timing G= 12.3 G= 26.3 JYL6.5 G= G= G= 47.9 G= 9.5 G= G= Y= 6.5 Y= IY= IY= 5.5 Y= 5.5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 1 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB I WB NB SIB LT TH RT I LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 308 353 82 131 562 200 1319 230 1685 295 Lane group capacity, c 284 415 351 265 737 281 1991 150 2061 833 vlc ratio. X 1.08 0.85 0.23 0.49 0.76 0.71 0.66 1.53 0.82 0.35 Total green ratio, g/C 0.39 0.23 0.23 0.38 0.23 0.08 0.40 0.08 0.40 0.53 Uniform delay, d, 44.0 44.1 37.4 27.2 43.3 153.6 29.1 55.0 31.9 16.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.891 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.36 0.04 0.04 0.28 0.23 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 Incremental delay, d2 77.8 14.7 0.1 0.5 4.2 6.9 1.7 .270.6 3.7 10.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Control delay 121.8 58.8 37.6 27.7 47.6 60.5 27.7 325.6 35.6 16.6 Lane group LOS F E D C D E C F D 8 Approach delay 82.6 43.8 32.0 63.3 Approach LOS F D C E Intersection delay 54.2 X, = 1.05 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TI4 Copyright ® 2000 University, of Florida, All Rights Reserved version 4.1 f 233 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.M_JOSEPH\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k2B7.tmp 2/15/2006 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 31 --,, --x C ■-- 1,- \* :, '*� *\ *N �► Movement EBL EBT FBR WBL WBT WBR S,EL 5ET SER NW: ,L NWT NWR Lane Configurations +� ►j +I Vi + r I T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1727 3202 1740 3459 1770 1809 1516 1761 1657 Fit Permitted 0.34 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.36 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 625 3202 703 3459 561 1809 1516 671 1657 Volume (vph) 35 365 99 281 690 81 77 176 141 230 185 185 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 35 365 99 281 690 81 77 176 141 230 185 185 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 6 0 0 0 118 0 34 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 447 0 281 765 0 77 176 23 230 336 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 52.4 48.6 68.0 59.2 26.3 19.7 19.7 42.0 29.4 Effective Green, g (s) 52.4 48.6 68.0 59.2 27.3 19.7 19.7 42.0 29.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.57 0.49 0.23 0.16 0.16 0.35 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 308 1297 523 1706 204 297 249 392 406 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.14 c0.06 0.22 0.02 0.10 c0.08 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.24 0.06 0.02 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.34 0.54 0.45 0.38 0.59 0.09 0.59 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 19.5 24.7 14.2 19.8 37.8 46.4 42.6 29.8 42.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.4 2.1 0.1 1.4 12.4 Delay (s) 19.5 25.4 14.7 20.6 38.2 48.5 42.6 31.2 55.3 Level of Service B C B C D D D C E Approach Delay (s) 25.0 19.1 44.4 46.1 Approach LOS C B D D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 30.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mira! Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 16 234 4840: SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 Movement E=BL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations M 0 ti ti tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 4% -1 % 7% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3384 3295 3484 3392 1728 3269 1814 3507 1574 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3384 3295 3484 3392 1728 3269 1814 3507 1574 Volume (vph) 172 729 128 255 1519 180 117 320 52 160 541 339 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 172 729 128 255 1519 180 117 320 52 160 541 339 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 7 0 0 12 0 0 0 77 Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 847 0 255 1692 0 117 360 0 160 541 262 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot _ Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.8 44.6 18.5 54.3 12.3 17.5 16.4 21.6 31.4 Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 46.1 19.0 54.8 12.8 18.0 16.9 22.1 32.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.38 0.16 0.46 0.11 0.15 0.14 0.18 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 6.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 290 1266 552 1549 184 490 255 646 425 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.26 0.07 c0.50 0.07 0.11 c0.09 c0.15 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.67 0.46 1.09 0.64 0.73 0.63 0.84 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 52.8 30.6 45.9 32.6 51.4 48.7 48.6 47.2 38.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.12 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 2.8 0.2 52.6 4.9 4.6 3.4 8.9 1.9 Delay (s) 55.0 33.4 46.1 85.2 57.8 59.2 52.0 56.1 40.2 Level of Service D C D F E E D E D Approach Delay (s) 37.0 80.1 58.8 50.3 Approach LOS D F E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 61.1 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 17 235 4848: S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 * I2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) +tT )) tti� tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 1% 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1690 4665 3276 4788 3262 3376 1484 1762 3495 1494 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1690 4665 3276 4788 3262 3376 1484 1762 3495 1494 Volume (vph) 118 984 141 354 1380 112 95 313 249 172 880 245 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 118 984 141 354 1380 112 95 313 249 172 880 245 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 8 0 0 0 179 0 0 103 Lane Group Flow (vph) 118 1109 0 354 1484 0 95 313 70 172 880 142 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 4 4 6 4 6 4 0 0 4 6 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.0 39.9 16.0 46.9 7.8 16.2 16.2 23.9 32.3 32.3 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 40.9 17.0 47.9 8.8 17.2 17.2 24.9 33.3 33.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.14 0.40 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.21 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 141 1590 464 1911 239 484 213 366 970 415 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.24 c0.11 c0.31 0.03 c0.09 0.10 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.70 0.76 0.78 0.40 0.65 0.33 0.47 0.91 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 54.2 34.2 49.6 31.4 53.1 48.5 46.2 41.8 41.9 34.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.64 0.93 1.02 1.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 31.7 2.6 5.1 2.4 0.4 2.1 0.3 0.3 11.6 0.2 Delay (s) 85.9 36.8 37.2 22.5 49.9 51.4 70.7 42.1 53.5 34.8 Level of Service F D D C D D E D D C Approach Delay (s) 41.4 25.3 58.5 48.5 Approach LOS D C E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 39.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 18 236 5228: SW 356 St & 21 Av SW 2009 PM Alt 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis II2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NB_L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►il T ►j tT. I T 4 r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 11 Grade (%) 0% -1 % 0% 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3467 1810 1778 3321 1770 1680 1777 1503 Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.73 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 463 1810 830 3321 790 1680 1356 1503 Volume (vph) 399 423 2 136 797 265 62 18 34 235 59 363 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 399 423 2 136 797 265 62 18 34 235 59 363 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 25 0 0 0 184 Lane Group Flow (vph) 399 425 0 136 1033 0 62 27 0 0 294 179 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 1 % 2% 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 40.7 31.5 33.7 28.0 19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3 Effective Green, g (s) 40.7 31.5 33.7 28.0 19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.44 0.47 0.39 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 650 797 467 1301 213 453 366 406 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.23 0.02 c0.31 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.11 0.08 c0.22 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.53 0.29 0.79 0.29 0.06 0.80 0.44 Uniform Delay, dl 11.1 14.6 10.9 19.2 20.7 19.4 24.3 21.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.3 0.1 3.2 0.3 0.0 11.4 0.3 Delay (s) 12.3 15.0 11.1 22.4 21.0 19.4 35.7 21.9 Level of Service B B B C C B D C Approach Delay (s) 13.7 21.1 20.2 28.1 Approach LOS B C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.5 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 71.5 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 19 237 5246: S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT %VBR NBL NBT NBR SBI_ SBT SBR Lane Configurations M T r +T+ +'+ *i Tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3456 1828 1540 1725 3476 3333 3314 1770 3512 1540 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3456 1828 1540 1725 3476 3333 3314 1770 3512 1540 Volume (vph) 176 374 327 161 601 32 282 400 75 49 993 362 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 176 374 327 161 601 32 282 400 75 49 993 362 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 156 0 3 0 0 12 0 0 0 142 Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 374 171 161 630 0 282 463 0 49 993 220 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.2 27.1 27.1 13.4 31.3 11.5 52.0 6.5 47.0 47.0 Effective Green, g (s) 9.2 27.1 27.1 13.4 31.3 11.5 53.0 6.5 48.0 48.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.26 0.10 0.44 0.05 0.40 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 265 413 348 193 907 319 1464 96 1405 616 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.20 c0.09 0.18 c0.08 c0.14 0.03 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.91 0.49 0.83 0.69 0.88 0.32 0.51 0.71 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 53.9 45.2 40.5 52.2 40.0 53.6 21.7 55.2 30.1 25.2 Progression Factor 0.77 0.85 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.38 0.31 Incremental Delay, d2 4.1 20.0 0.3 24.5 1.9 23.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 0.9 Delay (s) 45.8 58.6 28.4 76.7 41.9 76.9 22.3 56.6 12.9 8.6 Level of Service D E C E D E C E B A Approach Delay (s) 44.8 49.0 42.6 13.3 Approach LOS D D D B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 33.7 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Synchro 6 Report 612 Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 20 238 5251: S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM Alt 2 2/14/2006 -,* -0. 4-- k- 4\ i Movement EBL EBT : EBR WBL - WBT -- WBR NBL. NBT NBR $BL SBT ,- SBR Lane Configurations I tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1739 1503 1785 1760 3484 3549 1761 3522 Fit Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1286 1503 607 1760 3484 3549 1761 3522 Volume (vph) 338 15 259 17 25 15 408 721 8 16 1160 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 338 15 259 17 25 15 408 721 8 16 1160 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 179 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 353 80 17 30 0 408 729 0 16 1160 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 3% 3% 0% 0% 2% 1 % 2% 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 13.0 63.3 2.7 51.0 Effective Green, g (s) 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 15.0 64.3 3.7 53.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.54 0.03 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 397 463 187 543 436 1902 54 1556 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.12 0.21 0.01 c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm c0.27 0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.17 0.09 0.05 0.94 0.38 0.30 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 39.5 30.3 29.5 29.2 52.0 16.3 56.9. 27.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.01 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 20.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 27.0 0.6 1.1 3.3 Delay (s) 59.8 30.4 29.6 29.2 77.0 16.9 58.0 31.2 Level of Service E C C C E B E C Approach Delay (s) 47.4 29.3 38.5 31.5 Approach LOS D C D C Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 37.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Federal Way CC v12 Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report 612 Page 21 239 2009 AM V11 b Alt 2 52: S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Warr City Center _ _ 1/11/2006 Movenjertt FBL E87 ERR WBL W..�T WBLR. tVB,L lyl�T .. N6R,_ S8L_ $BT .....55fR Lane Configurations W. tti� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 '1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 3335 3262 3151 3352 4658 3385 4714 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 3335 3262 3151 3352 4658 3385 4714 Volume (vph) 165 286 28 220 227 158 108 1272 598 182 372 54 Peak -hour factor, P H F 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 165 286 28 220 227 158 108 1272 598 182 372 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 109 0 0 64 0 0 14 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 165 308 0 220 276 0 108 1806 0 182 412 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 6 6 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 14.4 15.1 13.4 14.1 8.1 61.4 10.1 63.4 Effective Green, g (s) 14.4 15.1 13.4 14.1 8.1 61.4 10.1 63.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.13 0.11 0.12 0.07 0.51 0.08 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 210 420 364 370 226 2383 285 2491 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.09 0.07 c0.09 0.03 c0.39 c0.05 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.79 0.73 0.60 0.75 0.48 0.76 0.64 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 51.3 50.5 50.8 51.2 53.9 23.4 53.2 14.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 16.2 5.6 1.5 5.5 0.6 2.3 3.4 0.1 Delay (s) 67.5 56.1 47.2 49.7 54.5 25.7 56.6 14.8 Level of Service E E D D D C E B Approach Delay (s) 60.0 48.8 27.3 27.3 Approach LOS E D C C In, Summary HCM Average Control Delay 35.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 MR 2009 AM V11 b Alt 2 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp Federal Wav Citv Center 1/11/2006 f-- t . t Movement EBL EBT EBR WB.L WBT WB_ R, NBL JyPT. ,NBR SBL SBT $BR Lane Configurations 0 '� tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % -3% 6% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3235 1814 3479 1614 1643 1528 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3235 1814 3479 1614 1643 1528 Volume (vph) 0 1190 252 246 414 0 0 0 0 190 8 235 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1190 252 246 414 0 0 0 0 190 8 235 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1429 0 246 414 0 0 0 0 96 102 34 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Split custom Protected Phases 4 3 8 6 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 73.5 20.2 87.7 11.3 11.3 16.3 Effective Green, g (s) 73.5 20.2 87.7 11.3 11.3 17.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.17 0.73 0.09 0.09 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1981 305 2543 152 155 284 v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 c0.14 0.12 0.06 c0.06 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.81 0.16 0.63 0.66 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 16.1 48.0 4.9 52.3 52.5 44.7 Progression Factor 1.00 0.65 1.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 12.8 0.1 6.1 7.5 0.1 Delay (s) 18.5 43.9 9.0 58.5 59.9 44.8 Level of Service B D A E E D Approach Delay (s) 18.5 22.0 0.0 51.4 Approach LOS B C A D Intersection. Summa HCM Average Control Delay 25.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 11.3.1 % ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 2 241 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed Time Period AM Peak Intersection S 272 St & 272 -1-5 NB Ramp Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 AM VI Alt 2 Project ID Federal Way Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB L7 7 TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Lane group L T T R LT R Volume, V (vph) 641 688 406 854 187 11 404 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 2 1 2 4 4 4 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P P A A A Ell Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 4 2 4 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 12.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.712 0.712 0.234 0.234 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 157 10 0 184 0 Lane width 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 14.0 14.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 3 N N -2 N N -1 N N N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, Ne 0 5 4 0 0 3 -+7 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.3 3.3 3.2 Phasing Thru & RT EB Only 03 04 1 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 51.0 1Y= G= 39.0 G= G= G= 15.0 G= G= G= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH I RT Adjusted flow rate, v 641 688 406 697 198 220 Lane group capacity, c 556 2596 1460 672 234 201 v/c ratio, X 1.15 0.27 1 0.28 1.04 0.85 1.09 Total green ratio, g/C 0.32 0.79 0.43 0.43 1 0.13 0.13 Uniform delay, d, 40.5 3.3 22.5 34.5 51.4 52.5 Progression factor, PF 0.965 :2.108 0 867 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.36 10.50 Incremental delay, d2 83.2 0.2 0A 27.4 22.8 91.0 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 122.3 7.1 19.6 61.9 74.2 143.5 Lane group LOS F A B E E F Approach delay 62.7 46.3 110.7 Approach LOS E D F Intersection delay 63.4 xc = 1.09 Intersection LOS E J HCS2000'M Copyright ® 2000 University offlorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4 If 242 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Mirai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed Time Period Intersection S 272 St & Military Rd S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 AM V11 Alt 2 Project ID Federal Way Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L T R L TR L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 431 635 117 121 734 119 518 623 171 58 130 84 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 4 4 4 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P I A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 4 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.868 0.866 0.868 11.000 1.000 11.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 46 10 0 11 10 0 86 10 0 75 Lane width 12.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 12.0 11.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -3 N N 0 N N 0 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, Ns 2 3 0 0 1 4 1 4 1 2 3 3 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing Thru & RT EB Only Excl. Left 04 SB Only NB Only 07 08 Timing G= 26.0 G= 2.0 G= 15.0 G= G= 9.7 G= 42.3 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0,25 Cycle Length. C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 431 635 71 121 842 518 623 85 58 130 9 Lane group capacity, c 320 933 '1036 221 721 620 636 534 143 148 123 v/c ratio, X 1.35 0.68 0.07 0.55 1.17 0.84 0.98 0.16 0.41 0.88 0.07 Total green ratio, g/C 0.18 0.28 0.67 0.13 0.22 0.35 0.35 10.35 0.08 10.08 0.08 Uniform delay, d, 49.0 38.8 6.9 49.3 47.0 35.7 38.4 26.7 52.4 54.6 51.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 0.151 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.08 0.50 0.35 0.48 0.04 0.04 0.39 0.04 Incremental delay, dZ 173.2 3.5 0.0 1.6 190.1 9.1 30.4 0.1 0.7 39.6 1 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay .222.2 42.3 1.0 50.9 137.1 44.8 68.8 26.7 53.1 94.1 51.1 Lane group LOS F D A D F D E C D F D Approach delay 107.9 126.3 55.7 80.1 Approach LOS F F E F Intersection delay 93.2 Xc = 1.10 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University ofFiorida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 243 2009 AM V11 b Alt 2 1651: S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 ---* 4\ t 1 41 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR,, Lane Configurations Vil r V1 ttt ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3305 1488 1787 4951 4901 1564 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3305 1488 1787 4951 4901 1564 Volume (vph) 876 162 153 596 491 223 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 876 162 153 596 491 223 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 79 0 0 0 56 Lane Group Flow (vph) 876 83 153 596 491 167 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 6 0 2 6 0 Turn Type Perm Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 8 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 47.8 47.8 14.1 60.7 40.6 88.4 Effective Green, g (s) 48.3 48.3 15.1 61.7 41.6 89.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.13 0.51 0.35 0.75 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2,0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1330 599 225 2546 1699 1237 v/s Ratio Prot c027 c0.09 0.12 c0.10 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.14 0.68 0.23 0.29 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 29.1 22.7 50.1 16.1 28.5, 4.2 Progression Factor 0.89 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.86 7.18 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.0 6.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 27.0 19.3 56.7 16.3 24.6 30.2 Level of Service C B E B- C C Approach Delay (s) 25.8 24.6 26.3 Approach LOS C C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 25.6 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 5 244 2009 AM V11 b Alt 2 3028: SW 320 St & 21 Av SW Federal Way City Center * I1/11/2006 Movement EBL _EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL. $_ BT SBR Lane Configurations I +T. ti t r tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 - Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 j Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3355 3446 3376 1760 1818 1489 1755 3159 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 3355 3446 3376 717 1818 1489 376 3159 Volume (vph) 365 799 123 111 261 26 209 576 415 88 265 165 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 365 799 123 111 261 26 209 576 415 88 265 165 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0 52 0 79 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 365 911 0 111 281 0 209 576 363 88 351 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#!hr) 0 2 3 3 3 0 3 0 2 2 3 3 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+ov pm+pt Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.1 34.4 10.6 18.9 58.6 47.9 58.5 49.4 43.3 i Effective Green, g (s) 26.6 34.9 10.6 18.9 59.5 48.4 59.0 49.4 43.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.29 0.09 0.16 0.50 0.40 0.49 0.41 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 ! Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 396 976 304 532 453 733 732 225 1140 v/s Ratio Prot 0.20 c0.27 0.03 c0.08 c0.04 c0.32 0.04 0.02 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.20 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.93 0.37 0.53 0.46 0.79 0.50 0.39 0.31 Uniform Delay, d1 45.7 41.4 51.5 46.5 18.0 31.3 20.5 24.5 27.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.67 Incremental Delay, d2 26.3 15.1 0.3 0.4 0.3 8.3 0.2 0.3 0.6 Delay (s) 71.9 56.5 51.8 46.9 18.2 39.6 20.7 25.1 19.2 Level of Service E E D D B D C C B - Approach Delay (s) 60.9 48.3 29.3 20.2 Approach LOS E D C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 42.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 6 245 2009 AM V11 b Alt 2 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --* --,, -';� 'r ■-- i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR. SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ► t1l ++ r M tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3246 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1494 3422 3424 1510 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3246 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1494 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 261 1187 220 133 267 72 56 411 289 113 360 66 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 261 1187 220 133 267 72 56 411 289 113 360 66 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 35 0 0 39 0 0 54 Lane Group Flow (vph) 261 1396 0 133 267 37 56 411 250 113 360 12 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 63.4 10.5 60.9 60.9 5.4 19.0 29.5 8.1 21.7 21.7 Effective Green, g (s) 12.5 63.4 10.0 60.9 60.9 4.9 19.0 29.0 7.6 21.7 21.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.53 0.08 0.51 0.51 0.04 0.16 0.24 0.06 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 352 1715 280 1808 788 141 550 361 217 619 273 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.43 0.04 0.07 0.02 c0.12 c0.06 c0.03 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.11 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.81 0.48 0.15 0.05 0.40 0.75 0.69 0.52 0.58 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 52.2 23.4 52.5 15.7 14.9 56.1 48.2 41.4 54.4 45.0 40.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.56 0.73 Incremental Delay, d2 7.2 4.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.7 4.8 4.6 0.9 0.8 0.0 Delay (s) 59.4 27.8 53.0 15.9 15.0 56.8 53.0 46.0 54.1 26.1 29.7 Level of Service E C D B B E D D D C C Approach Delay (s) 32.7 26.2 50.6 32.5 Approach LOS C C D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 35.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 7 2009 AM V11 b Alt 2 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 / Movement EBL EBT EBR , WBL WB7' WBR ►JBL NBR SYVL2 SWL SWR Lane Configurations tt rrt fit W Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3487 1446 165 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 1608 495 197 1127 0 0 0 240 9 792 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1608 495 197 1127 0 0 0 240 9 792 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1608 337 197 1127 0 0 0 124 125 613 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 75.0 75.0 97.0 82.0 13.5 13.5 28.5 Effective Green, g (s) 75.0 75.0 97.0 82.0 13.0 13.0 28.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.81 0.68 0.11 0.11 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2179 904 363 2442 180 180 834 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 c0.08 0.32 0.07 0.08 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.37 0.54 0.46 0.69 0.69 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 15.7 11.0 25.7 8.8 51.6 51.6 42.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.07 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 1.2 0.7 0.5 8.4 9.0 2.9 Delay (s) 17.9 12.2 28.3 5.7 60.0 60.6 45.5 Level of Service B B C A E E D Approach Delay (s) 16.6 9.1 0.0 49.0 Approach LOS B A A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 21.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 8 247 2009 AM V11 b Alt 2 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Wav Citv Center --* --,, --v f- ♦ I f1/11/2006 i Movement EBL E_ BT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL. NBT NBR SBL Sot SBR Lane Configurations Vi t r tT )) +tT ) ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0,97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1659 1792 1499 1660 3274 3368 4880 1796 5120 1548 Flt Permitted 0.33 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 570 1792 1499 319 3274 3368 4880 1796 5120 1548 Volume (vph) 138 457 188 62 375 93 405 701 74 110 371 223 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 138 457 188 62 375 93 405 701 74 110 371 223 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 132 0 21 0 0 9 0 0 0 120 Lane Group Flow (vph) 138 457 56 62 447 0 405 766 0 110 ' 371 103 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 42.6 34.2 34.2 38.0 31.9 20.5 45.2 11.0 35.7 44.1 Effective Green, g (s) 45.6 35.7 35.7 40.0 32.9 21.0 45.7 11.5 36.2 46.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.27 0.18 0.38 0.10 0.30 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 306 533 446 186 898 589 1858 172 1545 595 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.26 0.02 0.14 c0.12 c0.16 c0.06 0.07 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.04 0.09 0.05 v/c Ratio 0:45 0.86 0.13 0.33 0.50 0.69 0.41 0.64 0.24 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 25.8 39.7 30.8 29.7 36.6 46.4 27.3 52.3 31.5 24.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 12.4 0.0 0.4 0.2 2.5 0.6 5.6 0.4 0.1 Delay (s) 26.2 52.2 30.8 30.0 36.8 30.3 11.7 57.9 31.9 24.4 Level of Service C D C C D C B E C C Approach Delay (s) 42.5 36.0 18.1 33.6 Approach LOS D D B C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 30.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.1 % ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 9 MN 2009 AM V11 b Alt 2 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 3, -. --* C .- *--- \* � '� *\ *\ '�* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W5.R SEL SET SER NWT NWT NWR. Lane Configurations I + r* T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1717 3209 1746 3364 1771 1809 1534 1761 1622 Fit Permitted 0.62 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.39 1:00 1.00 0:62 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1116 3209 442 3364 724 1809 1534 1157 1622 Volume (vph) 81 643 187 81 159 55 65 169 10 70 106 182 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 643 187 81 159 55 65 169 10 70 106 182 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 32 0 0 33 0 0 0 8 0 95 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 798 0 81 181 0 65 169 2 70 193 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt _ pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.7 24.1 26.7 24.1 13.8 10.3 10.3 14.0 10.4 Effective Green, g (s) 26.7 24.1 26.7 24.1 14.8 10.3 10.3 15.0 10.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.39 0.43 0.39 0.24 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 509 1255 247 1316 250 302 256 327 274 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.25 c0.01 0.05 c0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.13 0.04 0.00 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.64 0.33 0.14 0.26 0.56 0.01 0.21 0.71 Uniform Delay, d1 10.4 15.2 10.8 12.1 18.6 23.6 21.4 18.4 24.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.1 6.6 Delay (s) 10.4 17.7 11.1 12.3 18.8 24.8 21.4 18.5 30.7 Level of Service B B B B B C C B C Approach Delay (s) 17.0 12.0 23.1 28.3 Approach LOS B B C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 19.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 61.6 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 10 249 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 '52: S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --v f- I 10. t Movement EBL EBT EBR. WBL W.BT W.B.R NBL N.BT N.BR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � +T )) ti� )) ++ T. )I ++T Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 3250 3262 3244 3352 4617 3385 4781 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 3250 3262 3244 3352 4617 3385 4781 Volume (vph) 113 384 113 417 335 116 204 809 465 327 1097 60 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 113 384 113 417 335 116 204 809 465 327 1097 60 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 29 0 0 82 0 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 474 0 417 422 0 204 1192 0 327 1152 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 6 6 0 2 0 2 2 2 6 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 11.6 20.4 18.3 27.1 10.7 45.3 16.0 50.6 Effective Green, g (s) 11.6 20.4 18.3 27.1 10.7 45.3 16.0 50.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.17 0.15 0.23 0.09 0.38 0.13 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 169 553 497 733 299 1743 451 2016 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.15 c0.13 0.13 0.06 c0.26 c0.10 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.67 0.86 0.84 0.58 0.68 0.68 0.73 0.57 Uniform Delay, dl 52.3 48.4 49.4 41.3 53.0 31.3 49.9 26.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.5 12.0 9.0 0.5 5.0 2.2 4.9 1.2 Delay (s) 59.9 60.4 53.6 36.6 58.0 33.5 54.8 27.6 Level of Service E E D D E C D C Approach Delay (s) 60.3 44.8 36.9 33.6 Approach LOS E D D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 40.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 250 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 57: S 272 St & 1-5 SB - 272 Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 T �► 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W.BR NB,L .,,NOT N,BR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT* tt *T r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 - Grade (%) 1 % -3% 6% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 } Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 ` Satd. Flow (prot) 3163 1814 3479 1614 1642 1524 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3163 1814 3479 1614 1642 1524 Volume (vph) 0 857 286 156 426 0 0 0 0 308 10 402 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 857 286 156 426 0 0 0 0 308 10 402 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1123 0 156 426 0 0 0 0 154 164 168 } Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 ] Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot Split custom Protected Phases 4 3 8 6 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 74.5 14.7 83.0 15.8 15.8 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 74.5 14.7 83.0 15.8 15.8 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.12 0.69 0.13 0.13 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1964 222 2406 213 216 343 } v/s Ratio Prot c0.36 c0.09 0.12 0.10 c0.10 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.70 0.18 0.72 0.76 0.49 Uniform Delay, d1 13.4 50.6 6.5 50.0 50.3 44.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.38 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 7.6 0.2 9.8 12.7 0.4 Delay (s) 14.6 77.6 1.1 59.8 63.0 44.4 Level of Service B E A E E D 1 Approach Delay (s) 14.6 21.6 0.0 51.9 Approach LOS B C A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 27.2 HCM Level of Service C 1 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.1 % ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 2 251 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 59: S 272 St & 272 - 1-5 NB Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 --, --* ---t f- 'Q 4\ t ?* " # Movement EBL EBT EBR W,BL WBT WBR N131 NBT NBB SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 14 14 12 12 12 Grade (%) 3% -2% -1 % -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1872 1584 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1710 3272 3428 1379 1872 1584 Volume (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 418 161 14 153 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 418 161 14 153 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 82 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 477 634 0 0 378 297 0 175 71 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 5 0 0 4 0 4 0 _3 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Split Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 95.3 45.3 45.3 14.7 14.7 Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 95.3 45.3 45.3 14.7 14.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.79 0.38 0.38 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 641 2599 1294 521 229 194 v/s Ratio Prot c0.28 0.19 0.11 c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.24 0.29 0.57 0.76 0.37 Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 3.2 26.1 29.6 51.0 48.4 Progression Factor 0.77 0.13 0.46 0.37 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 0.2 0.5 4.0 12.7 0.4 Delay (s) 28.6 0.6 12.5 15.0 63.7 48.8 Level of Service C A B B E D Approach Delay (s) 12.6 13.8 56.8 0.0 Approach LOS B B E A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 19.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.1 % ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 3 252 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 60: S 272 St & Military Rd S Federal Way City Center II1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WB_.L, WBT MR, NRL NB.T NBR SBL S.BT SBR Lane Configurations I ++ r Vi +T, I + r I + r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 3385 1500 1770 3291 1759 1804 1470 1775 1828 1523 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1748 3385 1500 1770 3291 1759 1804 1470 1775 1828 1523 Volume (vph) 87 525 217 98 540 77 301 188 81 71 213 115 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 525 217 98 540 77 301 188 81 71 213 115 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 87 0 8 0 0 0 57 0 0 98 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 525 130 98 609 0 301 188 24 71 213 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 3 0 0 4 2 4 2 3 3 0 4 Turn Type Prot pm+ov Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 47.0 71.7 10.4 47.8 24.7 35.3 35.3 7.3 17.9 17.9 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 47.0 71.7 10.4 47.8 24.7 35.3 35.3 7.3 17.9 17.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.39 0.60 0.09 0.40 0.21 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 140 1326 896 153 1311 362 531 432 108 273 227 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.16 0.03 c0.06 c0.19 c0.17 0.10 0.04 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.40 0.14 0.64 0.46 0.83 0.35 0.06 0.66 0.78 0.08 Uniform Delay, d1 53.4 26.3 10.6 53.0 26.7 45.7 33.4 30.4 55.1 49.2 43.9 Progression Factor 0.93 0.89 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.9 0.9 0.0 6.7 1.2 14.3 0.1 0.0 10.5 12.5 0.1 Delay (s) 55.6 24.2 9.1 59.7 27.8 60.0 33.5 30.4 65.6 61.6 44.0 Level of Service E C A E C E C C E E D Approach Delay (s) 23.6 32.2 47.0 57.2 Approach LOS C C D E Intersection Summa HCM Average Control Delay 36.7 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 4 253 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 � --,, 4- � I i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT : WBR NB.L:., ,NU NBR SBL S.BT SBR; Lane Configurations t•� Vi ti� Vi ttT I ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 3260 1759 3271 1759 4766 1773 4938 1532 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1764 3260 1759 3271 1759 4766 1773 4938 1532 Volume (vph) 238 426 159 280 515 180 265 1121 285 313 1151 151 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 238 426 159 280 515 180 265 1121 285 313 1151 151 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 33 0 0 29 0 0 37 0 0 0 50 Lane Group Flow (vph) 238 552 0 280 666 0 265 1369 0 313 1151 101 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.1 22.2 20.5 25.6 22.5 35.4 22.4 35.3 52.4 Effective Green, g (s) 17.1 22.2 20.5 25.6 22.0 35.4 21.9 35.3 52.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.18 0.17 0.21 0.18 0.30 0.18 0.29 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 603 300 698 322 1406 324 1453 733 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 0.17 c0.16 c0.20 0.15 c0.29 c0.18 0.23 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.82 0.97 0.97 0.79 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 51.0 48.0 49.1 46.6 47.1 41.8 48.7 39.0 20.3 Progression Factor 0.88 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.41 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 40.4 17.6 34.3 23.0 5.6 9.1 40.3 4.5 0.0 Delay (s) 85.5 57.1 83.3 69.7 29.2 26.1 89.0 43.5 20.3 Level of Service F E F E C C F D C Approach Delay (s) 65.3 73.6 26.6 50.1 Approach LOS E E C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 49.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mira! Associates, Inc. Page 5 254 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way City Center Date Performed 01/11/2006 Time Period 12:00 am Intersection S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 SAT v1lb Alt 2 Project ID Volume and Timin /n ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 1 3 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 117 152 245 276 126 187 260 1429 391 249 1365 51 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A P P A P P Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 1 1.5 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 4 2 4 4 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 0.988 0.988 0.090 0.090 0.585 0.585 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 48 10 0 44 10 0 41 10 0 3 Lane width 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 1 12.0 111.0 12.0 111.0 Parking / Grade I Parking N -2 N N 0 N N 2 N N 2 N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, NB 2 0 4 0 0 2 0 4 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 1 3.3 3.3 Phasin Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Thru & RT NB Only Excl. Left 08 G= 11.1 Timing Y= 6 G= 27.4 Y= 4.5 G= G= G= 39.0 G= 1.0 G= 16.5 G= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 4.5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacify, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WS NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 117 349 276 269 260 1779 249 1413 Lane group capacity, c 340 378 263 376 321 1758 238 1592 v/c ratio, X 0.34 0.92 1.05 0.72 0.81 1.01 1.05 0.89 Total green ratio, g/C 0.38 1 10.22 0.38 0.22 0.18 0.38 10.13 0.32 Uniform delay, d, 26.0 45.5 40.0 43.0 47.0 37.5 52.0 38.4 Progression factor, PF 1,000 1,000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.116 1.000 0.965 Delay calibration, k 0.04 0.43 0.50 0.24 0.33 0.50 0.50 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 0.2 27.4 68.7 5.4 1 1.4 1 9.7 57.2 4.8 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 26.2 73.0 108.7 48.4 48.4 51.6 109.2 41.9 Lane group LOS C E F D D D F D Approach delay 61.2 79.0 51.1 51.9 Approach LOS E E D D Intersection delay 55.6 Xc = 1.06 Intersection LOS I E HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 t 255 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 - 3040: SW 320 St & 1 Av S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 ---* --,, -'V f, 4 *\ t ram► 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBFR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT 5 BR Lane Configurations �1 +14 ++ F M tt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% _1% -1 % 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3380 3295 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1500 3422 3424 1510 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3380 3295 3355 3563 1552 3456 3472 1500 3422 3424 1510 Volume (vph) 116 1368 114 399 1099 136 180 474 532 162 335 61 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 116 1368 114 399 1099 136 180 474 532 162 335 61 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 0 64 0 0 15 0 0 51 Lane Group Flow (vph) 116 1477 0 399 1099 72 180 474 517 162 335 10 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%, 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 2 2 4 0 4 0 4 4 2 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 55.4 16.5 63.6 63.6 10.0 19.8 36.3 9.3 19.1 19.1 Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 55.4 16.0 63.6 63.6 9.5 19.8 35.8 8.8 19.1 19.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.46 0.13 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.16 0.30 0.07 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 220 1521 447 1888 823 274 573 448 251 545 240 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.45 0.12 0.31 c0.05 0.14 c0.15 0.05 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.19 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.97 0.89 0.58 0.09 0.66 0.83 1.15 0.65 0.61 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 54.3 31.5 51.2 19.2 13.9 53.7 48.4 42.1 54.1 47.0 42.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 17.2 19.2 1.3 0.2 4.3 9.1 92.2 4.2 1.5 0.0 Delay (s) 55.4 48.7 70.4 20.5 14.1 58.0 57.5 134.3 58.3 48.5 42.7 Level of Service E D E C B E E F E D D Approach Delay (s) 49.2 32.1 92.0 50.7 Approach LOS D C F D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 54.0 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 7 256 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site information Analyst Mimi Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period Saturday Intersection S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 SAT v11 Alt 2 Project ID Federal Way City Center Volume and 71raing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 0 2 3 1 2 3 0 2 3 1 Lane group L TR L T R L TR L T R Volume, V (vph) 794 1372 57 513 '1070 369 223 946 275 461 989 488 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.5 13.5 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 Arrival type, AT 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.879 0.879 0.090 10.090 10.090 0.586 0.586 0.414 0.414 0.414 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 3 10 0 128 10 0 44 10 0 231 Lane width 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -6 N N 0 N N 2 N N -2 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 6 0 6 2 6 2 6 0 6 Min. time for pedestrians, G. 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 NB Only Thru & RT SB Only 08 Timing G= 16.5 G= 15.0 G= 15.5 G= G= 11.9 G= 15.7 G= 9.9 ]Y=-6 JG= Y= 5.5 Y= 6 Y= 1 6.5 JY= JY= 5.5 Y= 6 JY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Len llh, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB I WB NB SB L.T I TH RT LT J TH RT LT TH FtT LT TH I RT Adjusted flow rate, v 794 '1426 513 1070 241 223 1177 461 989 257 Lane group capacity,c 488 1593 447 1556 481 339 1346 290 1359 409 v/c ratio, X 1.63 0.90 1.15 0.69 0.50 0.66 0.87 1.59 0.73 0.63 Total green ratio, g/C 0.14 0.32 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.28 1 0.09 0.27 0.27 Uniform delay, di 51.5 39.1 52.0 35.8 33.3 151.8 40.9 1 54.8 139.7 38.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.972 1.000 0.691 0.691 1.000 0.998 1.000 0.751 0.751 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.19 0.38 0.50 0.25 0.16 Incremental delay, d2 .290.3 7.3 69.1 0.2 0.3 2.2 3.9 272.1 0.7 1.0 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 10.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Control delay 341.8 45.4 121.1 25.0 23.3 53.9 44.7 326.9 30.5 29.8 Lane group LOS F D F C C D D F I C I C Approach delay 151.4 51.8 46.2 110.5 Approach LOS F D D F Intersection delay 95.6 Xc = 1.01 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 257 rte•iir~.�r� ,,..e «� a nCNAAi\T 1 1141IM4 Detailed Report Page 1 of 1 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way City Center Date Performed 0111112006 Time Period 12:00 am Intersection S 320 St & 20 Av S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 SAT 01b Alt 2 Project ID volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 630 1381 366 505 1427 388 309 206 265 342 291 340 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 1.5 2.0 1.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Arrival type, AT 4 5 4 5 3 3 4 3 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, I 0.398 0.398 0.090 0.090 1.000 1.000 0.977 0.977 Initial unmet demand, Qh 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 40 10 0 41 10 0 38 10 0 35 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -3 N N 2 N N -1 N N -3 N Parking maneuvers, N. Buses stopping, NB 0 6 0 8 8 0 1 6 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 1 3.3 3.3 3.3 1 3.3 Phasing WB Only Thru & RT EB Only 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 14.5 G= 18.0 IY= G= 17.0 G= G= 16.0qCyc1eLerig(h.C= G= 31.0 G= G= Y= 4.5 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 4.5Y= 4.5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 630 1707 505 1774 309 433 342 596 Lane group capacity, c 484 1668 401 1499 285 440 280 431 v/c ratio, X 1.30 1.02 1.26 1.18 1.08 0.98 1.22 1.38 Total green ratio, g/C 0.14 0.33 10.12 0.31 1 0.42 10.25 0.42 0.25 Uniform delay, di 51.8 40.0 53.0 41.5 35.4 44.5 35.1 44.8 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.667 1.000 10.703 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k .0.50 10.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.49 0.50 0.50 Incremental delay, d2 141.9 20.3 118.6 83.2 177.6 38.5 126.9 185.9 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 193.6 46.9 171.6 112.4 113.0 83.0 162.0 .230.7 Lane group LOS F D F F F F F F Approach delay 86.5 125.5 95.5 205.6 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection delay 119.4 X� = 1.47 Intersection LOS F HCS200em Copyright O 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f 258 HCS2000- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Wai Agency or Co. Federal Way Date Performed 0212412004 Time Period Saturday Intersection S 320 St & 23 Av S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Federal Way Analysis Year 2009 SAT v11 Alt 2 Project ID Federal Way City Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 0 2 3 0 1 1 1 2 1 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR R L TR Volume, V (vph) 194 1672 75 495 2308 404 61 167 335 501 157 150 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 1.5 3.0 1.5 3.0 1.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 2.5 Arrival type, AT 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.090 10.090 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 '1.000 0.976 0.976 Initial unmet demand, Q. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 3 10 0 19 1 10 0 14 10 0 29 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 111.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 5 N N -5 N N 1 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 16 0 8 8 2 16 16 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 1 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 NB Only Thru & RT SB Only 08 Timing G= 10.0 IY= ly= G= 20.8 G= 20.0 G= G= 7.3 G= 7.1 G= 22.8 G= 4.5 6 Y= 6 Y= Y= 4.5 Y= 5.5 Y= 5.5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB W13 NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 194 1944 495 2693 61 209 279 501 278 Lane group capacity,c 264 1456 578 2024 96 275 512 604 506 v/c ratio, X 0.73 1.34 0.86 1.33 0.64 0.76 0.54 0.83 0.55 Total green ratio, g/C 0.08 10.30 0.16 10.40 10.06 0.16 10.37 0.19 0.30 Uniform delay, d, .54.0 41.9 48.9 36.1 55.4 48.1 129.8 47.0 35.3 Progression factor, PF 1.000 0.984 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 0.986 Delay calibration, k 0.26 0.50 0.37 0.50 0.16 0.28 0.08 0.34 0.09 Incremental delay, dz 0.9 '151.3 11.5 152.2 10.1 10.5 0.7 8.7 0.7 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay 54.9 192.4 60.5 188.3 65.5 58.6 130.5 55.7 35.5 Lane group LOS D F E F E E C E D Approach delay 180.0 168.5 45.1 48.5 Approach LOS F F D D Intersection delay 147.9 J Xc = 1.05 Intersection LOS F HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 r 259 __J __,.\ av-_ 7 /K In nnK 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 3057: S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 / Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N8R SWL2 SW SWR Lane Configurations ++ r '� ++ N W Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3487 1446 1787 3574 1664 1664 3574 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3487 1446 97 3574 1664 1664 3574 Volume (vph) 0 2224 706 157 1860 0 0 0 133 3 838 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2224 706 157 1860 0 0 0 133 3 838 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 177 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2224 529 157 1860 0 0 0 68 68 804 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Perm pm+pt Split custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 77.9 77.9 87.9 77.9 17.6 17.6 32.6 Effective Green, g (s) 77.9 77.9 87.9 77.9 17.1 17.1 32.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.73 0.65 0.14 0.14 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2264 939 212 2320 237 237 956 v/s Ratio Prot c0.64 0.06 0.52 0.04 0.04 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.37 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.56 0.74 0.80 0.29 0.29 0.84 Uniform Delay, d1 20.4 11.6 49.9 15.4 46.0 46.0 41.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 15.2 2.4 8.7 2.3 0.2 0.2 6.5 Delay (s) 35.6 14.1 59.7 15.8 46.2 46.2 48.1 Level of Service D B E B D D D Approach Delay (s) 30.4 19.2 0.0 47.8 Approach LOS C B A D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 29.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 11 260 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 3058: S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 * Movement EBL EBT EBR W,BL W,BT WB,R SBL, SBR : NEL2 NEL NER Lane Configurations 0 r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) .3373 1434 3592 1532 1681 1620 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (perm) 3373 1434 3592 1532 1681 1620 Volume (vph) 0 1271 1091 0 1372 119 0 0 627 2 108 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1271 1091 0 1372 119 0 0 627 2 108 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 23 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1271 1091 0 1372 102 0 0 386 328 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Turn Type Free Perm Split Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.7 60.0 33.7 33.7 16.8 16.8 Effective Green, g (s) 33.7 60.0 33.7 33.7 16.3 16.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.56 0.56 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1895 1434 2018 860 457 440 v/s Ratio Prot 0.38 0.38 0.23 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm c0.76 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.76 0.68 0.12 0.84 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 9.2 0.0 9.3 6.2 20.7 20.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.3 1.9 0.3 12.9 6.0 Delay (s) 9.9 1.3 11.2 6.5 33.5 25.9 Level of Service A A B A C C Approach Delay (s) 6.0 10.8 0.0 29.9 Approach LOS A B A C intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 60.0 Sum of lost time (s) 0.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 12 261 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 3350: S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 ---* -* 'e- 4- 4- 4� t l' 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR W.RL WBT WBR NBL , NBT NBR SBL SBT, SBR Lane Configurations 1) T � �,�,� ►j �,��, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 _ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1696 1755 4854 1696 4890 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1752 1442 3249 1696 1755 4854 1696 4890 Volume (vph) 137 176 132 322 246 84 230 1182 379 239 1195 130 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 13-1 176 '132 322 246 84 230 1182 379 239 1195 130 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 115 0 10 0 0 46 0 0 11 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 137 176 17 322 32a 0 230 1515 0 239 1314 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 8 8 2 0 2 0 8 8 8 2 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.1 16.1 16.1 19.7 24.7 20.5 46.7 19.0 45.2 Effective Green, g (s) 10.6 15.6 15.6 19.2 24.2 20.0 46.7 18.5 45.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.20 0.17 0.39 0.15 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 157 228 187 520 342 293 _ 1889 261 1842 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.10 0.10 c0.19 0.13 c0.31 c0.14 0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.77 0.09 0.62 0.93 0.78 0.80 0.92 0.71 Uniform Delay, d1 54.0 50.5 46.0 47.0 47.1 47.9 32.5 50.0 31.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.82 Incremental Delay, d2 36.7 13.7 0.1 1.6 31.7 12.0 3.7 20.5 1.2 Delay (s) 90.7 64.2 46.0 48.5 78.8 59.9 36.3 49.1 27.2 Level of Service F E D D E E D D C Approach Delay (s) 67.0 63.8 39.3 30.5 Approach LOS E E D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 42.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 13 262 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 4218: SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW Federal Way City Center 1/11/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR W,BL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations tT+ 0 V1 t r 1� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1724 3241 1746 3426 1770 1809 1533 1761 1612 Fit Permitted 0.49 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 893 3241 394 3426 745 1809 1533 1213 1612 Volume (vph) 76 621 132 199 376 74 94 129 82 114 95 190 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 76 621 132 199 376 74 94 129 82 114 95 190 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 20 0 0 0 69 0 112 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 76 730 0 199 430 0 94 129 13 114 173 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.4 21.6 30.8 24.8 15.4 10.0 10.0 16.0 10.3 Effective Green, g (s) 24.4 21.6 30.8 24.8 16.4 10.0 10.0 17.0 10.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.34 0.48 0.39 0.26 0.16 0.16 0.26 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 375 1089 315 1321 292 281 238 378 258 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.23 c0.06 0.13 c0.03 0.07 0.03 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.24 0.05 0.01 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.67 0.63 0.33 0.32 0.46 0.05 0.30 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 13.0 18.3 11.0 13.9 19.0 24.7 23.1 18.6 25.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 3.3 3.0 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.2 5.3 Delay (s) 13.0 21.6 14.0 14.5 19.3 25.1 23.2 18.8 30.7 Level of Service B C B B B C C B C Approach Delay (s) 20.8 14.4 22.8 27.3 Approach LOS C B C C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.4 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.3 Sum of lost'time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1 % ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 14 263 Blank 264 1 l , Appendix M. 2009 Intersection Analysis Results for Alternative 2 — Mitigated -� Attached are the 2009 intersection analysis sheets for the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours for Alternative 2 intersections that required mitigation actions. Analysis of the PM, AM and Saturday peak hours used the Synchro 6.0 (Build 612) analysis software to report the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) f intersection operations. Where intersections exceeded the City's Level of - Service threshold of LOS E or a volume -to -capacity ratio of less than 1.0, results were exported from Synchro to the Highway Capacity Software (version 4.1f). Documents: 1. 2009 PM Peak Hour HCM results — Mitigated Intersections 2. 2009 AM Peak Hour HCM results — (Note: No Mitigated Intersections) 3. 2009 Saturday Peak Hour HCM results — Mitigated Intersections r M 265 2009 PM Alt 2 2550: S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way CC 02 Mitigation 4/14/2006 Movement E B L EBT EBR . WBL WBT WBR NE' NBT Nl3R SB.L Sa3T SBR Lane Configurations, Ta )) tti� ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 3282 1759 3262 3439 4852 1773 4938 1531 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1764 3282 1759 3262 3439 4852 1773 4938 1531 Volume (vph) 259 411 126 247 545 206 300 901 110 291 1633 347 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 259 411 126 247 545 206 300 901 110 291 1633 347 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 33 0 0 12 0 0 0 15 Lane Group Flow (vph) 259 512 0 247 718 0 300 999 0 291 1633 332 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 2 2 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 22.1 24.1 27.5 11.5 32.1 22.2 42.8 61.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.7 22.1 24.1 27.5 11.0 32.1 21.7 42.8 61.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.23 0.09 0.27 0.18 0.36 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 275 604 353 748 315 1298 321 1761 785 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.16 0.14 c0.22 c0.09 0.21 0.16 c0.33 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.85 0.70 0.96 0.95 0.77 0.91 0.93 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 50.1 47.3 44.6 45.7 54.2 40.5 48.2 37.1 18.2 Progression Factor 0.80 0.84 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 36.8 9.7 4.8 23.0 32.4 3.5 27.1 10.0 0.1 Delay (s) 76.9 49.2 49.4 68.7 65.0 22.4 75.3 47.1 18.3 Level of Service E D D E E C E D B Approach Delay (s) 58.2 63.9 32.2 46.3 Approach LOS E E C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 47.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.1 % ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 49119"', 2009 PM Alt 2 4050: S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way CC 02 Mitigation II4/14/2006 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL V116T W; 1.J r IBI-. NBT NBR SBL SOT, SB.R Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1661 1792 1499 1657 3173 3368 4942 1796 5120 1551 Flt Permitted 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 231 1792 1499 669 3173 3368 4942 1796 5120 1551 Volume (vph) 308 353 260 131 401 236 200 1283 38 230 1685 339 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 308 353 260 131 401 236 200 1283 38 230 1685 339 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 175 0 75 0 0 3 0 0 0 44 Lane Group Flow (vph) 308 353 85 131 562 0 200 1318 0 230 1685 295 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 2 6 2 6 0 0 6 2 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.8 32.2 32.2 32.9 24.3 9.5 40.2 15.5 46.2 62.7 Effective Green, g (s) 48.3 33.7 33.7 34.9 25.3 10.0 40.7 16.0 46.7 64.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.21 0.08 0.34 0.13 0.39 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 307 503 421 274 669 281 1676 239 1993 836 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.20 0.04 0.18 0.06 0.27 c0.13 c0.33 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 0.06 0.10 0.14 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.70 0.20 0.48 0.84 0.71 0.79 0.96 0.85 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 34.9 38.6 32.9 33.0 45.4 53.6 35.7 51.7 33.4 15.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 52.2 3.6 0.1 0.5 9.0 6.7 3.7 47.2 4.6 0.1 Delay (s) 87.0 42.3 33.0 33.5 54.4 51.9 25.9 98.9 38.0 15.8 Level of Service F D C C D D C F D B Approach Delay (s) 54.6 50.8 29.3 40.9 Approach LOS D D C D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 41.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mirai Associates, Inc. Synchro 6 Report Page 1 267 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 - MIT1 a 2750: S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S Federal Way City Center * 16/9/2006 �-- I 1 t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r 1� Mi +0 ) tti� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 11 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1806 1855 1556 1707 1642 1752 4658 1787 4900 Fit Permitted 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 392 1855 1556 846 1642 1752 4658 1787 4900 Volume (vph) 117 152 245 276 126 187 260 1429 391 249 1365 51 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 117 152 245 276 126 187 260 1429 391 249 1365 51 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 205 0 45 0 0 40 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 117 152 40 276 268 0 260 1780 0 249 1413 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 0 4 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.4 19.9 19.9 32.0 21.7 22.2 51.6 18.2 47.6 Effective Green, g (s) 28.9 19.4 19.4 32.5 21.2 21.7 51.6 17.7 47.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.18 0.18 0.43 0.15 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 4.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 206 300 252 310 290 317 2003 264 1944 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.08 c0.08 c0.16 c0.15 c0.38 c0.14 0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.03 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.51 0.16 0.89 0.92 0.82 0.89 0.94 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 37.9 45.9 43.3 40.5 48.6 47.3 31.6 50.7 30.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.89 1.05 0.73 1.00 0.22 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.5 0.1 24.9 32.5 1.5 0.6 28.1 1.4 Delay (s) 40.0 46.4 43.4 60.4 75.6 51.2 23.6 78.6 8.2 Level of Service D D D E E D C E A Approach Delay (s) 43.5 68.5 27.1 18.7 Approach LOS D E C B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 31.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Agency or Co. Federal Way City Center Date Performed 0111112006 Time Period 12:00 am Intersection S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2009 SAT v116 Alt 2 - MIT1a Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 2 3 0 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 Lane group L TR L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 794 1372 57 513 1070 369 223 946 275 461 989 488 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 j 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A P P A P P A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.5 3.0 2.5 3.5 3.5 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 2.5 Arrival type, AT 4 3 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 Unit extension, UE 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Filtering/metering, 1 0.878 0.878 0.403 0.403 0.403 0.580 0.580 0.580 9.705 0.705 0.705 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 10 0 3 10 0 128 10 0 1 10 0 19 Lane width 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -6 N N 0 N N 2 N N -2 N Parking maneuvers, Nm Buses stopping, NB 2 6 0 6 2 6 2 6 6 0 6 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Phasing EB Only Thru & RT WB Only 04 1 NB Only Thru & RT SB Only 08 Timing G= 16.5 IY= G= 15.0 G= 15.5 G= G= 12.1 G= 9.2 G= 16.2 IY= G= 5.5 Y= 6 Y= 6.5 Y= Y= 5.5 Y= 6 6 Y= Duration of Analysis. T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 794 1426 513 1070 241 223 946 274 461 989 469 Lane group capacity,c 488 1593 447 1556 481 345 1133 606 466 1351 683 v/c ratio, X 1.63 0.90 1.15 0.69 0.50 0.65 0.83 0.45 0.99 0.73 0.69 Total green ratio, g/C 0.14 0.32 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.23 0.41 0.14 0.27 0.45 Uniform delay, di 51.5 39.1 52.0 35.8 j 33.3 51.6 43.9 25.6 51.6 39.9 26.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.691 0.691 1.000 1.000 0.535 1.000 0.753 0.832 Delay calibration, k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.17 0.35 0.04 0.49 0.25 0.21 Incremental delay, d2 290.3 7.3 77.3 1.0 1.5 1.9 3.1 0.1 32.1 1.3 1.7 Initial queue delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control delay .341.8 46.4 129.3 25.8 24.5 53.5 47.0 13.8 83.7 31.3 23.4 Lane group LOS F D F I C C D I D B F I C C Approach delay 152.1 54.7 41.7 42.0 Approach LOS F D j D D Intersection delay 78.1 X� = 0.94 Intersection LOS E IICS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4 If 269 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 - MIT1 a 3052: S 320 St & 20 Av S Federal Way City Center 4/14/2006 } -* -* � � 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W, FR ,N13(_ NBT . NSK SBL S:BT SBFR Lane Configurations )) tO )) ttT+ t r t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1 % -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3519 4974 3432 4828 1736 1891 1522 1705 1846 1524 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3519 4974 3432 4828 371 1891 1522 672 1846 1524 Volume (vph) 630 1381 366 505 1427 388 309 206 265 342 291 340 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 630 1381 366 505 1427 388 309 206 265 342 291 340 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 41 0 0 0 221 0 0 246 Lane Group Flow (vph) 630 1707 0 505 1774 0 309 206 44 342 291 94 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 8 0 8 0 6 6 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.5 45.0 18.8 42.3 36.2 20.2 20.2 36.2 20.2 20.2 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 45.0 18.3 42.3 36.7 19.7 19.7 36.7 19.7 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.38 0.15 0.35 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.31 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 6.0 4.5 4.5 6.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 616 1865 523 1702 307 310 250 352 303 250 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 c0.34 0.15 c0.37 c0.14 0.11 0.14 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.03 0.16 0.06 v/c Ratio 1.02 0.92 0.97 1.04 1.01 0.66 0.17 0.97 0.96 0.38 Uniform Delay, dl 49.5 35.7 50.5 38.8 36.9 47.0 43.1 38.2 49.8 44.7 Progression Factor 0.65 0.50 0.93 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.03 1.25 Incremental Delay, d2 34.5 5.7 13.7 24.9 53.0 4.1 0.1 39.5 40.2 0.3 Delay (s) 66.8 23.6 60.9 36.6 89.9 51.2 43.3 79.6 91.6 56.3 Level of Service E C E D F D D E F E Approach Delay (s) 35.0 41.9 63.8 75.0 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 47.0 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 WC 2009 SAT v11 b Alt 2 - MIT1 a 3055: S 320 St & 23 Av S Federal Way City Center --p.. '4-- 4-- t I4/14/2006 # Movement EBL - EBT EB.R WB.L WBT WBR NBL, . - NET NBR SBL $BT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r + rr 1) 1� Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 11 11 12 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3334 4818 3554 5208 1576 1688 1760 2539 3244 1665 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3334 4818 3554 5208 1576 1688 1760 2539 3244 1665 Volume (vph) 194 1872 75 495 2308 404 61 167 335 501 157 150 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Adj. Flow (vph) 194 1872 75 495 2308 404 61 167 335 501 157 150 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 0 87 0 0 10 0 31 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 194 1944 0 495 2308 317 61 167 325 501 276 0 } Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 } Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 16 0 0 8 2 8 2 16 16 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot pm+ov Prot } Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 39.8 21.5 50.8 50.8 8.2 18.2 39.7 20.0 30.0 ] Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 40.8 21.0 51.8 51.8 7.7 18.7 39.7 19.5 30.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.18 0.43 0.43 0.06 0.16 0.33 0.16 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 6.0 4.5 6.0 6.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 1638 622 2248 680 108 274 840 527 423 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.40 0.14 c0.44 0.04 c0.09 0.07 c0.15 c0.17 - v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.70 1.19 0.80 1.03 0.47 0.56 0.61 0.39 0.95 0.65 Uniform Delay, d1 53.5 39.6 47.4 34.1 24.3 54.5 47.2 30.8 49.8 40.0 Progression Factor 0.76 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.80 Incremental Delay, d2 3.4 87.7 6.5 26.2 2.3 4.0 2.6 0.1 26.6 2.7 Delay (s) 44.2 114.6 54.0 60.3 26.6 58.5 49.9 30.9 77.0 34.8 Level of Service D F D E C E D C E C t Approach Delay (s) 108.2 55.0 39.5 61.0 Approach LOS F E D E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 71.4 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Synchro 6 Report -' Mirai Associates, Inc. Page 1 271 Blank 272 Appendix N. 2014 Forecasts Attached are the tables that detail the factors that calculate the 2014 forecasts. Information includes the trip forecasts, PM peak hour volumes from the model (UFOSNET), AM and Saturday growth factors, and final post -processed values. Tables showing the Christian Faith Center volumes are included. Documents: 1. 2009 Land Use Trip Generation tables - Alternative 1-3 for PM, AM and Saturday PM peak hours 2. 2014 Land Use Trip Generation tables - Alternative 1-3 for PM, AM and Saturday PM peak hours 3. PM Peak hour post -processing tables 4. AM Peak hour post -processing tables 5. Saturday Peak hour post -processing tables 273 2009 Land Use NO ACTION (ALT 3) TAZ PSRC TAZ SFUNIT MFUNIT RETAIL FIRES Others Lodging Civic Parking 1049 392 0 3 18848 8623 101 0 0 0 1050 392 0 16 130592 16792 4132 0 0 0 1051 392 0 182 0 2800 0 0 0 0 1055 392 0 7 22502 54710 390 0 0 0 1056 392 0 5 67737 2276 339 0 0 0 1057 392 0 0 19358 43906 151 0 0 0 1058 392 0 0 63756 856 151 0 0 0 1060 392 0 5 21112 11682 579 0 0 0 1061 392 0 3 28990 58083 1786 112 0 0 1062 392 0 11 16159 11900 432 0 0 0 1063 392 0 5 27394 1598 220 0 0 0 1064 392 0 4 53025 6668 865 0 0 0 1065 392 0 0 155197 1517 206 118 0 0 1066 392 0 2 72914 10657 2489 0 0 0 1067 392 0 2 74906 48023 445 0 0 0 1072 398 0 31 605641 109059 10010 0 0 0 Total 0 275 1,378,133 389,150 22,296 230 Block 1 0 213 322795 129964 5264 0 0 0 Block 2 0 31 449697 150128 7022 230 0 0 Block 3 0 31 605641 109059 10010 0 0 0 PM Peak Hour Total Block 1 Total 0 132 1210 194 5 0 0 1541 inbound 0 86 581 33 1 0 0 701 outbound 0 46 629 161 4 0 0 840 Block 2 Total 0 19 1686 224 6 136 0 2071 inbound 0 12 809 38 1 72 0 933 outbound 0 7 877 186 5 64 0 1138 Block 3 Total 0 19 2271 162 9 0 0 2462 inbound 0 13 1090 28 2 0 0 1132 outbound 0 7 1181 135 7 0 0 1329 0 171 5168 580 19 136 0 6073 AM Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 109 332 201 4 0 0 647 inbound 0 22 203 177 4 0 0 405 outbound 0 87 130 24 1 0 0 242 Block 2 Total 0 16 463 233 6 129 0 846 inbound 0 3 283 205 5 79 0 574 outbound 0 13 181 28 1 50 0 273 Block 3 Total 0 16 624 169 8 0 0 817 inbound 0 3 381 149 7 0 0 539 outbound 0 13 243 20 2 0 0 278 0 140 1419 603 19 129 0 2311 Saturday Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 111 1604 53 2 0 0 1770 inbound 0 60 834 29 1 0 0 923 outbound 0 51 770 25 1 0 0 847 Block 2 Total 0 16 2235 62 2 166 0 2481 inbound 0 9 1162 33 1 93 0 1298 outbound 0 7 1073 28 2 73 0 1183 Block 3 Total 0 16 3010 45 4 0 0 3074 Inbound 0 9 1565 24 1 0 0 1599 outbound 0 7 1445 21 2 0 0 1475 0 143 6849 160 8 166 0 7325 274 2009 Land Use - ALT 1 TAZ PSRC TAZ SFUNIT MFUNIT RETAIL FIRES Others Lodging 1049 392 0 0 21602 9175 0 0 1050 392 0 8 148860 28535 1600 60 1051 392 0 182 0 2800 0 0 1055 392 0 0 27595 56625 0 0 1056 392 0 50 71357 3725 0 0 1057 392 0 0 21042 44550 0 0 1058 392 0 25 65442 1500 0 0 1060 392 0 45 40908 30000 0 36 1061 392 0 45 57443 89175 800 148 1062 392 0 0 63130 25538 0 0 1063 392 0 0 51371 8563 0 0 1064 392 0 45 60110 8662 800 36 1065 392 0 0 164343 8000 0 118 1066 392 0 45 82550 13525 2400 36 1067 392 0 45 90645 62037 0 36 1072 398 0 150 751600 162200 8800 120 0 640 1717998 554610 14400 590 Block 0 265 355898 146910 1600 60 Block 2 0 225 610500 245500 4000 410 Block 3 0 150 751600 162200 8800 120 PM Peak Hour Block 1 Total inbound outbound Block 2 Total inbound outbound Block 3 Total inbound outbound AM Peak Hour Block 1 Total inbound outbound Block 2 Total Inbound outbound Block 3 Total inbound outbound Saturday Peak Hour Block 1 Total Inbound outbound Block 2 Total inbound outbound Block 3 Total inbound outbound Civic Parking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 50 0 300 0 450 0 0 0 150 0 300 Total -A Use A 0 164 1335 219 1 35 0 1755 0 107 641 37 0 19 0 804 0 58 694 182 1 17 0 951 0 140 2289 366 3 242 0 3040 0 91 1099 62 1 128 0 1381 0 49 1190 304 3 114 0 1659 0 93 2819 242 8 71 0 3232 0 60 1353 41 2 38 0 1494 0 33 1466 201 6 33 0 1738 0 397 6442 826 12 348 0 8026 0 135 367 228 1 34 0 764 0 27 224 200 1 20 0 473 0 108 143 27 0 13 0 292 0 115 629 381 3 230 0 1357 0 23 384 335 3 140 0 884 0 92 245 46 1 90 0 473 0 77 774 251 7 67 0 1177 0 15 472 221 6 41 0 756 0 61 302 30 1 26 0 421 0 326 1770 860 12 330 0 3298 0 138 1769 60 1 43 0 2011 0 74 920 33 0 24 0 1051 0 63 849 28 0 19 0 960 0 117 3034 101 1 295 0 3548 0 63 1578 54 0 165 0 1861 0 54 1456 46 1 130 0 1687 0 78 3735 67 3 86 0 3969 0 42 1942 36 1 48 0 2070 0 36 1793 31 2 38 0 1900 0 333 8538 227 5 425 0 9528 275 2009 Land Use - ALT 2 TAZ PSRC TAZ SFUNIT MFUNIT RETAIL FIRES Others Lodging Civic Parking 1049 392 0 0 28699 10318 0 0 0 0 1050 392 0 8 196056 58631 1600 132 0 175 1051 392 0 182 0 2800 0 0 0 0 1055 392 0 0 40762 61086 0 0 0 0 1056 392 0 115 80677 7883 0 0 0 0 1057 392 0 0 25403 46371 0 0 0 0 1058 392 0 50 69803 3321 0 0 0 0 1060 392 0 33 34819 23952 0 25 0 0 1061 392 0 33 48681 78906 800 156 0 0 1062 392 0 0 48676 21033 0 18 0 0 1063 392 0 0 43997 6263 0 10 0 0 1064 392 0 33 57932 8001 800 3 0 0 1065 392 0 0 161521 5858 0 127 0 0 1066 392 0 33 79580 12580 2400 4 0 0 1067 392 0 33 85794 57407 0 19 0 0 1072 398 0 120 715600 150200 8800 96 0 240 0 640 1718000 554610 14400 590 0 415 Block 0 355 441400 190410 1600 132 0 175 Block 2 0 165 561000 214000 4000 362 0 0 Block 3 0 120 715600 150200 8800 96 0 240 PM Peak Hour Total -A Use A Block Total 0 220 1655 284 1 78 0 2238 inbound 0 143 795 48 0 41 0 1027 outbound 0 77 861 235 1 37 0 1211 Block 2 Total 0 102 2104 319 3 214 0 2742 inbound 0 66 1010 54 1 113 0 1244 outbound 0 36 1094 265 3 100 0 1497 Block 3 Total 0 74 2684 224 8 57 0 3046 Inbound 0 48 1288 38 2 30 0 1406 outbound 0 26 1395 186 6 27 0 1640 0 397 6443 826 12 348 0 8026 AM Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 181 455 295 1 74 0 1006 inbound 0 36 277 260 1 45 0 619 outbound 0 145 177 35 0 29 0 387 Block 2 Total 0 84 578 332 3 203 0 1200 Inbound 0 17 352 292 3 124 0 788 outbound 0 67 225 40 1 79 0 412 Block 3 Total 0 61 737 233 7 54 0 1092 inbound 0 12 450 205 6 33 0 706 outbound 0 49 287 28 1 21 0 387 0 326 1770 860 12 330 0 3298 Saturday Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 185 2194 78 1 95 0 2552 inbound 0 100 1141 42 0 53 0 1336 outbound 0 85 1053 36 0 42 0 1216 Block 2 Total 0 86 2788 88 1 261 0 3224 inbound 0 46 1450 47 0 146 0 1690 outbound 0 39 1338 40 1 115 0 1534 Block 3 Total 0 62 3557 62 3 69 0 3753 Inbound 0 34 1849 33 1 39 0 1956 outbound 0 29 1707 28 2 30 0 1797 0 333 8538 227 5 425 0 9528 276 2014 Land Use NO ACTION (ALT 3) TAZ PSRC TAZ SFUNIT MFUNIT RETAIL FIRES Others Lodging Civic Parking 1049 392 0 6 20719 9292 219 0 0 0 1050 392 0 26 143072 33262 7086 0 0 0 1051 392 0 182 0 2800 0 0 0 0 1055 392 0 17 25987 57288 845 0 0 0 1056 392 0 10 70192 4523 735 0 0 0 1057 392 0 0 20513 44905 327 0 0 0 1058 392 0 0 64913 1855 327 0 0 0 1060 392 0 10 24471 15511 1255 0 0 0 1061 392 0 7 33846 64597 2936 112 0 0 1062 392 0 25 24149 14758 936 0 0 0 1063 392 0 12 31464 3054 477 0 0 0 1064 392 0 8 54224 7097 941 0 0 0 1065 392 0 0 156772 2879 446 118 0 0 1066 392 0 5 74566 11248 2593 0 0 0 1067 392 0 4 77604 50966 964 0 0 0 1072 398 0 65 628012 117061 11422 0 0 0 0 376 1450506 441096 31509 230 0 0 Block 0 241 345397 153926 9539 0 0 0 Block 2 0 70 477097 170110 10548 230 0 0 Block 3 0 65 628012 117061 11422 0 0 0 PM Peak Hour Total Block Total 0 150 1295 229 8 0 0 1682 Inbound 0 97 622 39 2 0 0 760 outbound 0 52 674 190 6 0 0 923 Block 2 Total 0 43 1789 253 9 136 0 2231 inbound 0 28 859 43 2 72 0 1004 outbound 0 15 930 210 7 64 0 1227 Block 3 Total 0 40 2355 174 10 0 0 2580 inbound 0 26 1130 30 2 0 0 1188 outbound 0 14 1225 145 8 0 0 1391 0 233 5439 657 27 136 0 6493 AM Peak Hour Block Total 0 123 356 239 8 0 0 725 Inbound 0 25 217 210 7 0 0 458 outbound 0 98 139 29 1 0 0 267 Block 2 Total 0 36 491 264 9 129 0 928 Inbound 0 7 300 232 7 79 0 625 outbound 0 28 192 32 2 50 0 304 Block 3 Total 0 33 647 181 10 0 0 871 inbound 0 7 395 160 8 0 0 569 outbound 0 27 252 22 2 0 0 302 0 192 1494 684 26 129 0 2525 Saturday Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 125 1717 63 3 0 0 1908 Inbound 0 68 893 34 1 0 0 996 outbound 0 58 824 29 2 0 0 913 Block 2 Total 0 36 2371 70 4 166 0 2647 inbound 0 20 1233 38 1 93 0 1384 outbound 0 17 1138 32 3 73 0 1262 Block 3 Total 0 34 3121 48 4 0 0 3207 inbound 0 18 1623 26 1 0 0 1669 outbound 0 16 1498 22 3 0 0 1539 0 196 7209 181 11 166 0 7762 277 2014 Land Use - ALT 1 TAZ PSRC TAZ SFUNIT MFUNIT RETAIL FIRES Others Lodging Civic Parking 1049 392 0 0 25337 9875 0 0 0 0 1050 392 0 8 173700 45810 1600 100 0 0 1051 392 0 182 0 2800 0 0 0 0 1055 392 0 0 34525 59275 0 0 0 0 1056 392 0 75 76262 6050 0 0 0 0 1057 392 0 0 23337 45575 0 0 0 0 1058 392 0 50 67737 2525 0 0 0 0 1060 392 0 75 57513 44400 0 60 9500 0 1061 392 0 75 81338 113625 800 172 16500 0 1062 392 0 0 102550 36263 0 0 7000 100 1063 392 0 0 71486 14038 0 0 3650 0 1064 392 0 75 66050 10237 800 60 1050 0 1065 392 0 0 172038 13100 0 118 3400 100 1066 392 0 75 90650 15775 2400 60 1500 0 1067 392 0 75 103875 73062 0 60 7350 50 1072 398 0 250 871600 202200 8800 200 50000 500 0 940 2017998 694610 14400 830 99950 750 Block 0 315 400898 171910 1600 100 0 0 Block 2 0 375 745500 320500 4000 530 49950 250 Block 3 0 250 871600 202200 8800 200 50000 500 i PM Peak Hour Total -A Use A Block Total 0 195 1503 256 1 59 0 2015 inbound 0 127 722 44 0 31 0 924 outbound 0 68 782 213 1 28 0 1092 Block 2 Total 0 233 2796 478 3 313 350 4171 Inbound 0 151 1342 81 1 166 45 1786 outbound 0 81 1454 396 3 147 304 2385 Block 3 Total 0 155 3269 301 8 118 350 4200 inbound 0 101 1569 51 2 63 46 1830 outbound 0 54 1700 250 6 55 305 2370 0 583 7567 1035 12 490 700 10387 AM Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 161 413 266 1 56 0 897 inbound 0 32 252 234 1 34 0 554 outbound 0 129 161 32 0 22 0 344 Block 2 Total 0 191 768 497 3 297 130 1886 inbound 0 38 468 437 3 181 81 1208 outbound 0 153 299 60 1 116 49 678 Block 3 Total 0 128 898 313 7 112 130 1588 Inbound 0 26 548 276 6 68 81 1004 outbound 0 102 350 38 1 44 49 584 0 479 2079 1077 12 465 260 4371 Saturday Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 164 1992 70 1 72 0 2299 inbound 0 88 1036 38 0 40 0 1203 outbound 0 75 956 32 0 32 0 1096 Block 2 Total 0 195 3705 131 1 382 330 4744 inbound 0 105 1927 71 0 214 264 2581 outbound 0 90 1778 60 1 168 66 2163 Block 3 Total 0 130 4332 83 3 144 330 5022 inbound 0 70 2253 45 1 81 264 2713 outbound 0 60 2079 38 2 63 66 2309 0 489 10029 285 5 598 660 12065 278 2014 Land Use - ALT 2 TAZ PSRC TAZ SFUNIT MFUNIT RETAIL FIRES Others Lodging Civic Parking 1049 392 0 0 37165 11830 0 0 1400 0 1050 392 0 8 252360 95945 1600 220 34500 175 1051 392 0 182 0 2800 0 0 0 0 1055 392 0 0 56470 66810 0 0 5500 0 1056 392 0 170 91795 12905 0 0 4500 0 1057 392 0 0 30605 48585 0 0 2000 0 1058 392 0 105 75005 5535 0 0 2000 0 1060 392 0 55 47365 34320 0 25 9500 22 1061 392 0 55 66735 96510 800 244 16500 31 1062 392 0 0 78460 28755 0 18 7000 51 1063 392 0 0 59195 10205 0 10 3650 26 1064 392 0 55 62420 9135 800 3 1050 8 1065 392 0 0 167335 9530 0 127 3400 10 1066 392 0 55 85700 14200 2400 4 1500 11 1067 392 0 55 95790 65345 0 19 7350 17 1072 398 0 200 811600 182200 8800 160 0 400 0 940 2018000 694610 14400 830 99850 750 Block 0 465 543400 244410 1600 220 49900 175 Block 2 0 275 663000 268000 4000 450 49950 175 Block 3 0 200 811600 182200 8800 160 0 400 PM Peak Hour Total -A Use A Block Total 0 288 2038 364 1 130 349 3171 inbound 0 187 978 62 0 69 45 1342 outbound 0 101 1060 302 1 61 304 1829 Block 2 Total 0 171 2486 399 3 265 350 3675 inbound 0 111 1193 68 1 141 45 1559 outbound 0 60 1293 331 3 125 304 2116 Block 3 Total 0 124 3044 271 8 94 0 3541 Inbound 0 81 1461 46 2 50 0 1639 outbound 0 43 1583 225 6 44 0 1902 0 583 7568 1035 12 490 699 10386 AM Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 237 560 379 1 123 130 1430 inbound 0 47 341 333 1 75 80 879 outbound 0 190 218 45 0 48 49 551 Block 2 Total 0 140 683 415 3 252 130 1624 Inbound 0 28 417 366 3 154 81 1047 outbound 0 112 266 50 1 98 49 577 Block 3 Total 0 102 836 282 7 90 0 1317 inbound 0 20 510 249 6 55 0 840 outbound 0 82 326 34 1 35 0 478 0 479 2079 1077 12 465 260 4371 Saturday Peak Hour Block 1 Total 0 242 2701 100 1 158 329 3531 Inbound 0 131 1404 54 0 89 263 1941 outbound 0 111 1296 46 0 70 66 1590 Block 2 Total 0 143 3295 110 1 324 330 4203 inbound 0 77 1713 59 0 181 264 2296 outbound 0 66 1582 51 1 143 66 1907 Block 3 Total 0 104 4034 75 3 115 0 4331 inbound 0 56 2097 40 1 65 0 2259 outbound 0 48 1936 34 2 51 0 2071 0 489 10029 285 5 598 659 12065 279 UPOSNET 2009 PM PP Alt 7 INTID Location Northbound Souhbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 SI & Pacific HM S 1470 954 2124 2998 03 1104 1273 414 54701 5470 57 S 272 SI & 1.5 68 Rams 0 0 1397 1056 1093 1363 12i4 1265 3704 3704 69 8272 Sig 1.5 NB Rams 714 943 0 0 1637 1726 1597 1270 3948 3948 80 S 272 St & Military Rd S 471 586 837 1225 1525 985 1772 1809 4605 4605 1050 S 288 St& Pacific H $ 1408 1232 2801 2938 85 812 796 108 5090 5090 1056 S 268 St & MililarV Rd S 610 547 1029 948 531 862 930 843 3200 3200 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 1308 1365 2283 2021 795 806 991 1185 5377 5377 2557 S 312 St & 28 Av S 275 566 495 219 392 0 0 377 1 1102 1162 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 1114 801 887 1018 951 1154 1693 1672 4645 4645 3050 S 320 SI& Pacific Hwy S 1249 1497 2074 1708 1378 1412 1714 1798 6415 5415 3055 S 320 St& 23 Av S 672 416 695 560 1250 19B3 1991 1649 450 4608 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 1460 920 2287 1997 1517 2367 S2841 5284 3064 S 320 St & Military Rd S 330 523 667 731 1632 1463 1362 1274 3991 3991 3350 S 324 St& Pacific Hwy 5 1550 1212 1775 2040 497 774 732 528 4554 4554 4028 SW 3361h St & 21st Av SW 873 1085 1097 1094 969 957 1541 1344 4480 4480 4050 S 336 SI & Pacific S 1512 1719 2124 2039 909 576 708 919 5253 5253 4216 SW 3401h St & Ha Rd SW 600 299 394 557 498 626 1053 1063 12545 2545 4940 SW Campus Or& t Av S 494 671 1048 926 1010 931 1942 1966 4494 4494 4848 S 3481h S1 & Pacific Hn S 647 513 1252 1364 1234 1370 1830 1716 4963 4963 5228 SW 356 St & 21st Av SW 114 672 652 197 821D 696 1186 1207 2772 2772 5248 5 356 St & Pacific H S 753 $98 1303 1498 879 509 Si0 1230 3835 3835 5251 S 356 St& Enchanted Rkwy S 1126 1 1071 1156 1414 1 621 39 57 436 2960 2960 Volumes from FWCC-2009-UFOSNET-PP v12 2-16-06.xts UFOSNET 2009 PM PP Alt 2 IN71[3 Lpeatfon Nolibrb%g4 Soulhbound Eastbound West ound Total IN U7 IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1468 I 958 21457218 605 1104 1266 423 5484 5484 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ram 0 0 1400 tool 1306 1286 1265 3757 3757 59 S 272 51 & 1-5 NB Ramps 735 943 01639 1750 1650 1331 4024 4024 00 S 272 St & MillIA Rd S 476 028 873 1548 971 1782 1801 4679 4679 1050 S 288 St & Pacific H S 1406 1234 2787 87 812 798 108 5078 5078 305ti S 288 St 9 Mifilar Rd $ sOB 547 1015 824 854 931 832 3778 3178 255D 5 312 St& Pacific S 1306 1361 2267 796 812 We 1192 5367 5367 2557 S 312 St 4 28 Av S 274 Me 492 393 0 0 375 1159 1159 304D SW 320 St& 1 Av S ilia 80D 674 1004 951 1151 1693 1676 4831 41031 3050 S 320 St & Pacific I-hW S 1243 1494 206D 1OR 1377 1400 1714 1802 0394 6394 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av 8 em 412 U83 537 1236 i955 1M 1657 4571 4571 3057 S 320 S1 4 1.5 S8-32.0 Ramp 0 0 4493 918 2274 1996 1514 2386 5281 5281 3064 S 320 S1 & Militmy Rd S 331 523 665 735 1643 1466 1368 1281 4007 4007 3350 S 324 St & Padfic Hwy S 1547 1207 1757 2017 497 778 720 619 4521 4521 4028 SW 336th St & 21st Av SW 873 1088 1108 1094 889 961 1635 1344 4485 4485 4050 S 336 Si & PacKe Hwy S 1505 1718 2105 2019 908 567 706 923 5227 5227 4218 SW 3401h St & Hoyt ftd SW 600 301 394 556 499 621 1052 1061 2545 2545 4840 SW Campus Or & 1 Av S 469 672 1040 924 tole 92a 1932 1553 4477 4477 4848 S 3481h St & Pacific Hwy S 845 513 1256 1359 1227 1402 1844 legs 4972 4972 5228 SW 356 St & 21 at Av SW 114 68D 658 107 820 687 1191 1217 2781 2781 5248 S 356 St & Pacific Hn S 750 595 1389 1472 $72 498 794 1239 3805 3805 5251 I S 356 SI & Enchanled Pkvvy S 1132 1069 lies 142a 612 39 57 433 2969 2989 Volumes from FWCC-2009-UFOSNET-PP vl2 2-16-06.xls UFOSNET 2009 PM PP Alt 3 - No Action Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbiound I Eastbound Westbound Total IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1463 949 21 % 3016 604 1116 1275 417 5498 540 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Romps 0 0 1406 1005 1097 1391 1739 1265 3742 3742 59 S 272 51 & 1.6 Na Rams 712 944 0 D 1843 1734 I w 1303 3977 3977 60 S 272 $1 & Military Rd 5 467 570 875 1222 1532 986 1739 1835 4613 4613 1050 $ 288 St & Pacific Hwy, S 1403 1228 2812 2956 813 818 ell 110 5712 5112 1056 S 288 SI & M[Wag Rd S 607 542 1026 947 636 $65 923 838 3492 3192 2550 S 312 St & Pacific H 5 1306 1361 2291 2030 795 812 497 1186 5369 53a9 2557 S 312 SI & 28 Av S 278 569 495 213 388 0 0 379 1161 1161 3040 SW 320 St & i Av S 1116 790 867 1016 950 1155 1706 1678 409 4539 3050 S 320 St& Pacific Hwy S 1244 1496 2077 1718 1381 1413 1725 1800 6427 6427 3055 S 320 St& 23 Av S 668 428 700 545 1248 1978 2012 1677 4628 4628 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 1526 950 22a8 1094 1516 2386 5330 5330 3064 S 320 St& Military Rd 6 328 521 663 743 1639 1462 1381 1285 4011 4011 3350 S 324 $t & Pacific H S 154S 1207 1784 2035 497 772 710 52 2 4536 4536 4028 SW 3361h St& 21stAv SW 874 1088 1107 1098 969 959 1536 1340 4485 4485 4250 S 336 St& Pacific Hwy S 1612 1716 2119 2031 900 573 706 917 5237 5237 4218 SW 3401h SI & Ho Rd SW 599 301 394 554 499 626 1049 1060 2541 2541 4640 SW Campus Dr & i Av S 493 '672 1037 926 1012 924 1938 1958 4480 4480 4848 S 3481h St & Pacific H S 637 517 1265 1440 1216 1303 1917 1695 5035 5035 5228 SW 356 S3 & 21st Av SW 114 704 663 197 940 682 118D 1214 2797 2797 5246 S 356 51 & Pedlic H S 750 569 1459 1571 848 512 823 1208 3880 3880 52511 S 356 St& Enchanted Pkwy S 1148 1D67 1174 1454 625 40 58 444 3005 3D05 Volumes from FWCC-2009-UFOSNET-PP v12 2-16-06.x1s 3/10/2006 280 2004-09 to 2014 PM 02 b.xls 2014 Backaround arowth Alt 1 INTiD Location Northbound I Southbound I Eutbound Westbound I Total IN OUT LN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific k S 259 198 165 196 11 104 9D 28 626 526 57 S 272 SI & 1-5 SB Rams D 0 71 96 106 124 124 81 201 301 69 S 272 St & 1.5 NS Remps 57 187 0 0 124 83 213 124 394 394 60 S 272 $1 & Milltary Rd S 101 48 107 66 83 79 116 213 407 406 1050 S 288 S1 & Pacific Hwy S 3S4 274 200 213 4 147 65 6 642 642 1056 S 288 St & MililaryRO S 66 110 55 70 127 59 78 Be 326 325 2550 S 312 St & Padfc Hwy S 117 143 209 191 59 38 42 55 427 427 2557 S 312 St & 28 Av S 37 38 44 36 15 0 0 22 96 1 95 3040 SW 320 S1 & i Av S a1 70 103 92 i12 123 108 120 404 405 3050 S 320 St PacMn Hm S 130 127 203 200 148 139 log 123 590 589 3 D55 S 320 St 9 23 Av S 14 28 43 68 139 132 140 109 336 337 3057 S 320 St & 1.5 $8 - 320 RanV 0 1 0 85 37 ' 130 135 106 148 321 321 3064 S 320 Sl & Mllilary Rd S 35 67 127 100 174 188 157 139 493 494 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 132 128 198 205 5 30 44 18 379 379 4028 5W 336th St & 21at Av SW 59 123 218 168 85 136 152 87 514 514 4050 S 336 S1 & Pacific H S 150 137 201 215 43 52 69 69 471 473 4210 SW 340th St & HoA Rd SW 13 15 5fi 42 77 9D 122 120 288 267 4840 SW Campus Or & 1 Av 5 60 32 73 112 178 180 I 181 I 189 492 493 4848 S 3481h $l & Pacific Hwy S 128 96 18S 195 227 279 198 167 733 732 5226 SW 356 St 4 213t Av SW 52 f 18 77 239 $59 383 5240 S 356 St & Padrlc H S 140 130 214 225 136 �21 141 55B 556 5251 3 356 St & Enchanted P S 106137 183 i83 139128 1 426 1 428 EMME-2 model growth less City Center growth for 2014 2014 Backaround growth Alt 2 IN71D Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN LOUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 2% 198 165 196 11 104 9D 28 525 526 57 S 272 St & 15 68 Ram 0 0 71 SS 108 124 124 81 301 301 59 S 272 SI & 1.5 NS Ramps 57 187 0 0 124 83 213 124 394 394 60 S 272 St & Milita Rd S 101 48 107 66 83 79 116 213 407 406 1050 S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S 364 274 209 213 4 147 65 8 642 642 1050 S 288 St & Mili taa Rd S 66 110 55 70 127 59 78 86 326 325 2560 S 312 St & Pacific HWY S 117 143 209 191 59 38 42 55 427 427 2557 S 312 St & 28 Av S 37 38 44 36 15 0 0 22 1 96 1 96 3D40 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 81 70 103 1 92 112 123 108 120 1 404 405 3050 S 320 at & Pacific HWV S 130 127 203 200 148 ]39 109 123 590 589 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 14 28 43 66 139 132 140 109 336 337 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 RamD 0 0 85 37 130 138 106 146 321 321 3064 S 320 St & MjUlary Rd 8 35 67 127 100 174 lea 157 139 493 494 3350 S 324 St & Pacific H S 132 126 198 205 5 30 44 18 379 379 4028 SW 336th St&21st Av SW 59 123 218 168 85 136 162 87 514 514 4050 S 336 St & Pacific HwY S 158 137 201 215 43 52 69 69 471 473 4218 SW 340111 St & Ha Rd SW 13 15 56 42 77 90 122 120 268 267 4840 SW Cam us Dr & 1 Av S 60 32 731 112 178 180 181 169 492 493 4848 S 3481h SI & Pacifec HU S 128 96 180 195 227 279 198 162 733 732 5228 SW 356 St & 21 st Av SW 52 116 77 72 166 239 359 363 5246 S 35fi S18 Pacific H S 140 130 214 225 138 60 64 141 556 556 525i S 356 St & Enchanted P S 10fi 137 183 163 139 0 0 128 428 428 2014 Backaround growth Alt 3 Syn INTID Location Northbound Sculhbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN j OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 259 198 165 196 11 104 90 28 625 526 57 S 272 Si 81.5 SS Rams 0 0 71 96 106 124 124 81 301 301 59 S 272 S1 & 1.5 NB Ram 5 57 187 D 0 124 83 213 124 394 394 60 S 272 Si & Milliary Rd S 101 48 107 66 83 79 116 213 407 406 1056 S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S 364 274 209 213 4 147 65 8 642 642 10fi6 8 288 St & Military Rd S 66 110 55 70 127 59 78 88 326 325 2550 S3125L8Pacific Hwy S 117 143 209 191 59 38 42 55 427 427 2557 S 312 SI & 28 Av S 37 38 44 36 15 0 0 22 96 96 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Ar S 81 70 103 1 92 112 123 108 120 4041 405 3050 S 320 St 8 Pacll6c Hwy S 130 127 203 1 200 148 139 109 123 590 589 3055 S 320 at & 23 Av S 14 28 43 68 139 132 140 109 336 337 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 39 - 320 Romp 0 0 85 37 130 138 106 146 321 321 30S4 S 320 St& Military Rd S 35 67 127 100 174 188 157 139 493 494 3350 S 324 St & Psdfee H S 132 126 198 205 5 30 44 16 379 379 4028 SW 3361h St & 21 st Av SW 69 123 218 386 85 136 152 87 514 514 4050 S 330 St & Pacific H S 158 137 201 215 43 52 69 1 69 471 473 4218 SW 3401h St& Hoyt Rd $W 13 15 56 42 771 90 122 120 1 26B 267 4840 SW Campus Dr& 1 ArS 60W73 112 176 180 181 169 492 493 4840 S 348th SI & Paclfw S 128]80 195 227 279 198 162 733 732 5228 SW 356 SI & 21stAv SW 118 77 72 166 239 359 363 5246 S 356 St& Pablic S 140214 225 136 fi0 64 141 556 556 5251 S 356 St8 Enchanted PIt S 106183 J 163 139 1 128 428 428 281 2014 PM FWCC GROWTH Alt 1 INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Weslbouncl I Total 114 OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN 0 T IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hn S 23 22 21 27 0 1 0 1 50 51 57 S 272 St & 1.5 SB Rams 0 0 5 6 1 1 7 6 13 13 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 11 1 0 0 1 11 7 7 19 19 60 S 272 St 8 MKilary Rd S 2 4 4 5 11 9 8 7 25 25 1050 :i 288 St & Paclfic H S 57 32 37 41 0 27 5 0 99 100 loss S 288 St & M011SEY Rd S 3 1❑ 9 9 14 7 9 10 35 36 25W S 312 SI & Pacific Hwy, S 117 112 73 1 76 34 1 43 52 44 276 275 2557 S 312 St & 28 Av S 15 35 39 l6 20 0 0 23 1 74 74 3040 Sw 320 St & 1 Av S 14 14 8 29 5a 77 144 102 222 222 3056 S 320 SI & Pa6fic H S 102 155 140 103 102 174 247 15B 591 590 3055 S 320 S1 & 23 Av S 6 25 58 16 157 180 164 164 2W 385 3057 S 320 SI & 1-5 SB • 320 Ram 0 0 23 10 162 152 126 149 311 311 3064 S no St 8 Mary Rd S 13 5 4 25 133 105 86 100 236 235 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 140 92 99 118 7 70 72 38 318 318 4026 SW 336th St & 21st Av SW 11 20 33 21 8 0 7 18 59 59 4050 S 336 St & Pacific HM S 75 1015 91 77 29 1 3 13 19B 197 4218 SW 3401h SI & Hoyt Rd SW 0 0 1 1 7 7 19 19 27 27 4340 SW C us Dr & 1 Av S 2 0 13 16 2 4 9 6 26 26 4848 53481h St & Pacific S 19 33 36 12 7 10 8 13 70 fib 5228 SW 356St821s1AvSW 0 0 2 0 5 fi 9 11 16 17 5248 S 356 St & Pacific H S 8 16 11 6 10 1 0 5 27 28 5251 S 356 51 & Enchained Plc S 11 11 20 18 1 0 0 2 32 31 EMME-2 modeled growth for FWCC for 2014 2014 PM FWCC GROWTH Alt 2 INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Wastbound Total iN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT 52 S 272 SI & Pacific Hwy S 24 22 14 18 0 2 4 ❑ 42 42 57 S 272 $I & 1.5 SS Rams 0 0 3 3 2 2 4 4 9 9 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 10 2 0 0 2 10 4 4 16 16 50 S 272 SI & Mililsa Rd S 3 5 3 4 10 6 5 4 21 21 1050 S 288 St & Pacific S 63 34 26 30 0 30 5 0 94 94 1056 S 288 St & Milliary Rd S 3 12 9 11 17 8 9 7 38 38 2550 S 312 SI & Pacific S 131 124 63 a9 51 100 153 86 398 399 2557 S 312 $l & 28 Av S 14 41 40 18 35 1 1 29 89 88 SWO SW 320 St & 1 Av S 14 f 20 15 33 54 66 1 130 94 213 t 213 3D50 S 320 S1 & Pacific Hwy S 91 1 1.49 13.9 lot 87 126 196 136 512 512 3055 S 320 St 8 23 Av S 6 25 7.4 13 1la 158 116 116 312 312 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 9 6 142 137 94 104 245 247 3064 S 320 St & Militwx Rd S 11 5 4 23 117 93 61 73 193 194 3350 S 324 St & Pacl9c Hwy S 119 83 101 106 5 56 56 34 281 281 4028 SW 336th St & 21 st Av SW 11 20 37 1 24 9 0 7 19 1 64 63 4650 S 336 $l & Pacific Hwy S 64 B9 79 66 22 1 3 12 168 168 4218 SW 3401h St & Hoyl Rd SW 0 0 0 0 a 8 19 19 27 27 46a0 SW CampUs Dr & 1 Av S 2 0 12 15 2 4 8 5 24 24 4840 S 3481h St & Pacific H S 14 29 30 9 7 11 8 12 59 61 5228 SW358SI&21atAvSW 0 0 3 0 4 1 4 8 10 15 14 5246 S 356 St & Pad!S±Lwy S 1. 3 1 2 7 3 a 0 1 4 19 19 5251 S 356 St& Enchanted Pk S 9 9 17 15 D 1 0 0 3 26 27 20.14 PM FWCC GROWTH Alt 3 yn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Westbound Total IN OUT IN I OUT IN Ol1T IN OUT IN I OUT 52 S 272 St & Pack Hwy S 8 7 3 4 0. 2 1 0 12 1 13 57 S 272 SI & 1.5 SB Rams 1 1 0 0 j 1 1 2 2 4 4 59 S 272 St & I-5 NB Rams 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 1 4 4 60 S 272 St & Milikary Rd S 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 5 105o S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S 27 13 8 9 0 14 2 0 37 36 1056 5 288 SI & Milila Rd S 1 6 3 2 9 4 2 3 15 15 25M S 312 St & Paciric Hwy S 71 55 24 36 21 41 55 40 171 172 2557 S 312 St & 28 Av S 5 16 13 4 13 0 ❑ io 31 30 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 5 7 5 12 20 1 27 47 32 77 78 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 42 68 63 1 48 36 59 1 81 47 222 222 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 3 10 25 9 50 60 45 45 123 124 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 2 2 53 51 40 42 95 95 3064 S 320 SI & Mifr Rd S 5 3 2 9 40 30 22 28 69 70 3350 5 324 St & Pacific HWY S 54 38 46 52 2 26 28 14 130 4028 SW 3361h St & 21 st Av S'M 5 8 13 9 3 0 2 6 23 4050 57336 51 & PaciOc H S 30 39 39 32 8 0 1 6 77 4218 SW 3401h St & Hp Rd SW 0 0 0 0 3 3 6 6 9 4840 SW Ca us Dr & 1 Av S 1 0 5 5 0 1 2 2 d28 8 4848 S 348th St & Pacific H S 5 13 15 5 3 6 5 4 285228 SW 356 Sl & 21st Av SVV 0 0 1 fl 112 3 45246 S 356 St & Paclfic H S 1 4 4 2 3 0 0 3 96251 S 356 St & Enchanted Pk S 3 3 6 5 0 0 0 1 9 282 N 00 w Christian Faith Center PM Additional Volumes M2 Node INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 9371 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 5 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 9447 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 5 3 2 3 1 0 0 2 9414 30501 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 41 6 5 39 0 35 34 0 9382 30551 S 320 St & 23 Av S -24 0 2 -23 35 11 9 34 9219, 9887 305718 320 St & 1-5 SIB Ramp 0 0 21 0 11 24 0 8 9890, 9815, 9891 3058 S 320 St & 1-5 NB Ramp 0 17 0 11 24 13 17 0 9610 3061 S 320 St & Weyerhaeuser Wy S 26 0 0 20 13 9 7 17 9166 3064 S 320 St & MilitaryRd S 0 0 0 0 9 9 7 7 9415 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 44 41 38 90 2 -50 0 3 9165 3640 SW 330th St & 1 Av S 9 6 5 7 2 0 0 3 11218 40281 SW 336th St & 21st Av SW 2 3 2 3 2 6 9 3 9381 4043 S 336 St & 1 Wy S 2 9 7 3 0 9 12 0 9163 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 13 109 149 57 13 54 62 17 9458 4132 10 Av SW & SW Campus Dr 12 12 9 9 0 0 0 0 9162 4150 SR 99 & 16 Av S Connector 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 0 9162 4250 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 21 21 57 28 0 57 28 0 9162 4251 16 Av S & 16 Av S Connector 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 9210 4840 SW Campus Dr & 1 Av S 0 0 0 0 13 13 22 22 9223 4848 S 348th St & Pacific Hwy S 12 30 41 16 16 3 2 22 9224 4850 S 348th St & 16 Av S 9 18 24 12 0 12 9 0 9153 5228 SW 356 St & 21 st Av SW 0 2 1 0 4 5 7 5 9154 5246 S 356 St & Pacific Hwy S 7 12 15 9 5 0 0 6 9524 5251 S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwy S 5 5 8 8 0 0 0 0 2014 PM PP ALT 1 INTID Location North hound Southhiound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St& Pacific Hwy S 1752 1174 231D 3221 614 1209 1369 443 6045 6047 57 S 272 St & l•5 SB Ram 0 0 1473 1158 1200 1508 1345 1352 4016 4018 59 5 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 782 1131 0 0 1762 1820 1817 1410 4361 4361 60 S 272 $1 & Military Rd S 574 638 948 1296 1619 1073 1896 2029 5037 5030 1050 S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S 1829 1536 3047 3192 89 986 866 116 5831 5832 1058 S 288 St & Mllilary Rd S 679 667 10.93 1027 772 928 1017 939 3551 3561 25M S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 1547 1525 2560 2202 1 WS 887 1085 1284 6089 608E 2557 S 312 SI & 28 Av S 327 639 578 271 427 0 0 422 1332 1332 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 1214 888 1DOD 1142 1120 1354 1945 1895 5279 6280 3050 S 320 St & Pacific H S 1522 1765 2422 2050 1628 1760 2104 2079 1'676 7674 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av 3 668 469 798 621 1581 2306 2304 1956 5351 5352 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 1609 957 2590 2311 1749 2670 5948 5948 3084 S 320 St& Military Rd S 378 595 798 856 1948 1765 1612 1520 473E 4736 3350 S 324 S1& Pacific HWy S 1806 1471 2110 2453 511 824 848 $87 5335 5335 4028 SW 336th St & 21st Av SW 945 1231 1350 1286 1064 1090 17D9 1452 15068 5068 4050 S 33S St&.Pacific Hwy S 1758 2071 2565 238E 994 6113 .842 1018 6159 6160 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 613 314 451 600 562 723 1194 1202 2840 2839 4640 SW Cam us Or & 4 Av S 556 703 1134 11L54 1203 1128 2154 2163 W47 $048 4848 S 3481h St & Pacific JAwy S 806 672 1509 1587 1454 1662 2038 1913 5837 5834 5228 SW 356 St & 211t Av SW t 14 726 771 197 906 779 1368 1462 3159 3164 524E 3St 8 Pacific H S 906 756 1633 1738 1032 570 874 1382 4445 4446 'S,7 SS56 356 St& Enchanted Pkwy S 124E 7224 1367 1603 761 39 57 566 3433 3432 Sum of 2009 PM PP volumes + 2014 Background Growth+2014 FWCC growth+CFC trips 2014 PM PP ALT 2 INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1`751 1176 2324 3215 616 1210 43" 451 6051 5052 57 S 272 St & 1.5 SB Ramps 0 0 1474 1205 1199 1512 1394 1350 4067 4067 59 S 272 St & E•5 NS Ram 1 802 1132 0 0 1755 1643 1867 1459 4434 4434 60 S 272 St 8 M lilary Rd S 580 681 983 1289 1641 1058 1903 2078 5107 5106 1050 S 288 St & Pacific Hwy S 1833 1542 3022 3167 91 989 868 116 5814 5814 105E S 288 St& MMIary Rd S 877 669 1079 1026 768 921 1018 925 3542 3541 2550 S 312 St& Pacific Hwy S 1559 1633 2543 2286 906 950 1193 1333 62011 6202 2557 S 312 $1 & 28 Av S 325 645 576 272 443 0 0 1 426 1344 1343 3�040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 1213 893 994 1 1132 ilia 1340 1931 1892 5256 5257 3050 S 320 St PadfIC HWY S 1505 1776 2406 2032 1612 1706 2053 2061 7576 7575 3055 S 320 St& 23 Av S 664 465 802 595 1526 2266 2249 1916 5241 5242 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 $9 - M2 l RamP 0 0 1608 961 2557 2294 1714 262E 5879 5881 3064 S 320 SI& M[Ptary Rd S 377 595 795 850 1943 1758 1593 1500 4709 4711 3350 S 324 St& Pacific Flwy 6 1842 1457 2094 2418 509 816 520 574 5255 5285 4028 SW 3368t SI & 21 st Ay SW 945 1232 1365 1289 1085 1103 1703 1453 5078 5077 4050 S 336 St & Pacific HM S 1743 2053 2534 2357 986 674 840 11121 6103 6106 4218 SW 340Ih St & Hoyl Rd SW 613 316 450 598 584 725 1193 1200 2840 2839 4840 SW Carnpus Dr & 1 Av S 551 704 1125 1051 1209 1125 2143 2149 5028 5029 4848 S 348Ih St& Pacific tLoy S 799 668 1507 1579 1477 1695 2052 1894 5835 5836 5228 SW MO 31 & 21st Av SW 114 734 776 197 905 768 1372 1471 3167 3170 5246 S 356 $t & PaLdfir)iwy S 900 750 1625 1709 1023 558 859 1390 4407 4407 5251 S 356 St & Enchanted Pkwv S 1252 1220 1376 1614 751 39 57 564 3436 3437 2014 PM PP ALT 3 Syn INTID Location Northbound I Soulhbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN I OUT 1N OUT IN I OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St& Pacific Hwy S 1730 1154 2324 3216 615 1222 1366 445 6035 BD37 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 1 1 1477 1182 1204 1516 1365 1348 4047 4047 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 770 1129 0 0 1769 181E 1830 1428 4375 4375 60 S 272 St & Mj4tajy Rd S 570 $19 983 1289 1616 1067 1856 2049 5025 5024 1050 S 288 St& Pacific Hwy S 1794 1515 3029 3178 90 979 878 118 5791 5790 1056 S 288 St & Military Rd S 674 658 1084 1019 772 928 1003 927 3533 3532 255D S 312 St& Pacific Hwy S 1499 1564 2528 2261 875 891 1094 1261 599E 5997 2557 S 312 St & 28 Av S 320 623 552 253 41611118 0 411 1288 1287 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 12D7 870 977 1123 1083 1861 1832 5128 5130 3050 S 320 St & Pacific H S 1457 1697 23.18 2005 1585 1949 1970 7319 7318 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 661 466 770 599 14721 2206 1865 51 D9 5111 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ram 0 0 1634 989 2482 1662 2582 5778 5778 3064 S 320 St & MilitaryRd S 3" 591 792 052 1862 1567 1459 4569 4591 3330 S 324 St& Pacific H S 1775 1412 2066 2382 506 782 557 5129 5129 4028 SW 336th St & 211t AV SW 940 1222 1340 1278 1059 169a 1436 5037 5037 4050 S 336 St & Pacific H S 1713 2001 250E 2335 964 638 1009 6023 6024 4218 SW 340th St & Ho Rd SW 612 31fi 450 596 579 1177 1186 2818 2817 4040 SW Campus Dr& 1 Av S 554 704 1115 1043 12038 2143 2151 5015 5016 4848 5 348th St & Pacific H S 782 658 1501 76584621 2122 1883 5B67 5866 5228 SW 356 St & 21st Av SW 114 756 7B1 197 922 1355 1461 3172 3176 5246 S 356 St & Pacific H S 898 735 1692 1807 994 887 1358 4471 4472 5257 S 356 St&Enchanted Pk S 1262 1212 1371 1630 76458 573 3456 3455 2009 AM Adjusted Counts Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound I Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1947 1569 581 583 477 1058 594 389 3598 3598 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 420 505 1434 1371 659 637 2513 2513 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 597 1501 0 0 1321 1078 1255 594 3173 3173 60 S 272 St & MilitaryRd S 1307 1166 271 364 1171 859 970 1330 3719 3719 1651 S Dash Point Rd & PacificHw S 710 1437 642 575 1032 0 0 372 2384 2384 3028 SW 320 St & 21st Av SW 1141 952 516 483 1246 1214 371 625 3274 3274 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 726 741 539 712 1563 1458 471 388 3299 3299 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ram 0 0 859 684 1933 1659 1216 1664 4007 4007 4050 S 336 St & Pacific H S 1082 803 589 571 651 490 477 935 2799 2799 4218 1 S 340 St& Hoyt Rd SW 358 241 243 437 875 8'53 289 233 1765 1765 2009 AM volumes without CFC volumes 2009-14 AM background Growth Factors Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total 1N OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7 u % 7.7% 7.7% 7. o . 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Ramps 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 3028 SW 320 St & 21st Av SW 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.76%. 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7°Io 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% Annual growth rate = 1.5% from: am 98 VOLUME.As (12-30-05 by Rick Perez) 5-year growth rate = (1+1.5%)^5-1 = 7.7% 2014 AM Base = 2009 base x BGF Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 2097 1690 626 628 514 1140 639 419 3876 3876 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 453 544 1545 1477 710 686 2708 2708 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 643 1617 0 0 1423 1162 1352 639 3418 3418 60 S 272 St & Milita Rd S 1408 1256 292 392 1262 925 1044 1433 4006 4006 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 765 1548 692 620 1112 0 0 400 2568 2568 3028 SW 320 St& 21stAv SW 1229 1026 556 520 1343 1308 399 1 673 3527 3527 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 782 798 580 767 1684 1570 507 418 3554 3554 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 925 73T 2082 1787 1310 1793 4317 4317 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 1165 865 635 615 701 528 514 1007 3015 3015 4218 JS340St&HoytRdSW 385 260 262 471 942 1 919 311 251 1901 1901 285 LUUU Am 1611y center UISLrIDution - A11 1 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1.8% 1.6% 2.5% 3.4% 0.1% 0.4°% 1.0% 0.0% 5.3°% 5.3% 57 S 272 St & 1-5 58 imams 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 1.0°% 1.3% 1.3% 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.7% 0.2% 0-0% 0.8% 0.8% 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 0.2% 0.4% 0.1% 0,4% 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 1.3% 1.3% 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 2.5% 2.0% 6.2% 6.8% 6.6% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 9.4% 9.4% 3028 SW 32 St & 21sE Av SW 4.8% 1.3% 0.2% 1.3% 3.5% 7.4% 2.3% 0.9% 10.9% 10.9% 3040 SW 32 St & 1 Av S 2.5% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 8.9% 11.2% 0.1% 0.1% 11.6% 11.6°% 3057 S 32 St & 1-5 SB - 32 Ramp 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 1.0% 6.6% 5.7% 9.8% 12.1 % 18.8% 16.8% 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 6.1 % 8.4% 4.5% 4.0% 3.0% 0.2% 0.2% 1 1.2% 13.8% 13,80% 4218 S 34 St & Hoyt Rd SW 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3-0% 3.0% 0.5 % 0.5% 3.4°% 3.4% 1220 2009 AM City Center Distribution - AIt2 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific H $ 2.5°% 2.2% 2.2% 3.0°% 0.2% 0.7% 1.0% 0.0% 5.9% 5.9% 57 S 272 SI & 1.5 SB Rams 0.0% 0,0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 1.0% 1.6% 1.6% 59 S 272 St & i-5 N8 Rams 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 1.1 % 0.4% 0.0% 1.5% 1.5% 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 0.4% 0.6% 0.1% 0.4% 1.1 % 0.5% 0.3% 0.4% 1.9% 1.9% 1051 0 Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 3 5% 3.0% % D.2% 6.4% 1.3% 0.5% 3.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 10.0% 10.0% 3028 SW 32 St & 21st Av SW 4.8% 11% 7.2% 2.2% 0.8'% I0.35b 10.57L 3040 SW 32 St& 1 AvS 2.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.001c 8.5% 10.7% 0.1% 0.1% 11.1% 11.1% 3057 S 32 St & I-5 SB - 32 Ramp 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 1.4% 8.8% 7.4% 8.9% 10.9% 19.7 % 19.7% 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 5.9% 8.4% 5.1 % 4.1°% 3.0% 0.2% 0.2% 1.5% 14.2% 14.2% 4218 S 34 81 & Hoyt Rd SW 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 3.0% 0.5% 0.5% 3.4% 3.4% 1220 2009 AM City Center Distribution - Alt 3 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound I Westbound Total IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific H S 2.1% 2.1% 1.7% 1.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 4.3% 4.3% 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.9% 0.9% 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.9% 0.4% 0.0% 1.3% 1.3°% 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.3% 1.3% 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific H S 2.6% 2.1 % 4.3°% 4.7% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 7.3% 7.3% 3028 SW 32 St & 21st Av SW 9.0°% 1.3°% 0.4% 1.7% 3.4% 11.6% 2.6% 0.9% 15.5% 15.5% 3040 SW 32 St & 1 Av S 3.00/. 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 12.5°% 10.7% 3.9% 3.0% 19.3% 19.3% 30571 S 32 St & 1-5 SS - 32 Ramp 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.9°% 8.2% 7.3% 8.2% 9.5% 17.6% 17.6°% 40501 S 336 St & Pacific Hn S 5.6°% 8.6% 6.0% 4.7% 3.0% 0.4% 1 0.4% 1 1.3% 15.0% 15.0% 42181 S 34 St & Hoyt Rd SW 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0°% 6.0% 1 6.0% 0.9 % 1 0.9% 6.9% 6.9% 233 3/13/2006 286 2004-09 to 2014 AM & SAT v12c.x1s 2014 AM Growth Alt1 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Easttound Westhound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 19 17 26 36 1 4 11 0 57 57 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 11 0 4 4 0 11 14 14 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 4 2 0 0 4 7 2 0 9 9 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 3 4 1 4 7 4 4 2 14 14 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hw 27 21 67 73 6 4 1 4 101 101 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 52 14 3 14 38 79 25 10 1 117 117 304Q SW 320 St & 1 Av S 27 3 1 0 915 120 1 1 124 124 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 R2MP 0 0 26 11 71 61 105 130 201 201 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 65 90 48 43 32 2 3 13 1 148 148 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 0 0 0 0 32 32 5 5 37 37 FWCC growth for each altemativE 1073 FWCC trip generation Increase - 2009 to 2014 - Distribute 070504 2014 AM Growth AIt2 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 27 24 24 33 2 7 11 0 64 64 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 11 0 7 7 0 11 18 18 59 S 272 St & I-5 NB Rams 4 4 0 0 7 11 4 0 15 15 60 S 272 St & Militant Rd S 4 6 1 1 4 11 5 4 4 20 19 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy E 38 32 63 69 5 4 1 4 107 109 3028 SW 320 St & 21stAv SW 52 12 2 14 35 77 24 9 113 112 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 26 3 0 0 91 115 1 1 118 119 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 22 15 94 79 95 117 211 211 4050 S 336 St & Pacific H S 63 90 55 44 32 3 3 16 153 153 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 0 0 0 0 32 32 5 5 37 37 1073 FWCC trip generation increase - 2009 to 2014 - Distribute 070504 2014 AM Growth AIt3 Syn INTID Location Northtiound j Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific HLhy S 5 5 4 4 0 1 1 0 10 10 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 59 S 272 SI & 1-5 NB Rams 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 3 3 60 S 272 St & Miiita Rd S 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hw 6 5 9 10 1 1 0 0 16 16 3028 SW 320 SI & 21 st Av SW 19 3 1 4 7 25 6 2 33 34 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 6 0 0 12 27 23 8 6 41 41 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 3 2 18 16 18 20 39 38 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 12 18 13 10 6 1 1 3 32 32 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 0 0 0 0 13 13 2 2 15 15 214 FWCC trip generation increase - 2009 to 2014 - Distribute 070504 287 AM volumes revised 1-05-06 jd.pdf 2009 AM City Center Growth - AIt1 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 19 3 1 29 1 12 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 12 4 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 4 4 2 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 2 1 1 4 4 4 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 4 23 4 76J 1 7 1 3028 SW 320 St & 21st Av SW 9 50 3 6 37 16 11 1 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2 29 1 1 107 1 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 29 69 12 119 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 74 2 38 15 28 1 8 3 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 1 1 36 6 2009 AM City Center Growth - AIt2 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH I RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 27 4 2 25 21 12 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 12 8 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 5 8 5 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 5 1 7 6 4 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 4 35 41 72 6 1 3028 SW 320 St & 21st Av SW 8 51 2 5 35 16 10 1 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2 28 1 103 1 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 25 90 17 108 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 72 31 411 18 30 6 3 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW I I 36 6 2009 AM City Center Growth - AIt3 Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound I Eastbound Westbound LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 4 1 4 1 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 1 1 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 1 1 1 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 1 1 1 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 51 1 101 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 2 19 1 1 71 4 2 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 7 18 11 2 7 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 3 17 2 19 4050 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 13 1 10 3 6 1 1 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 14 2 Christian Faith Center AM Additional Volumes INTID Location Northbound Sorthbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2550 S 312 St & Pacift Hwy S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 18 18 35 35 0 0 0 0 53 53 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 73 1 9 17 139 0 64 122 0 212 212 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB Ram2 0 t 0 157 0 64 99 0 122 221 221 3058 S 320 St & 1-5 N9 Ramp 0 18 0 64 99 35 18 0 117 117 3061 S 320 St & We erhaeuser Wy S 27 0 0 52 0 27 52 0 79 79 3064 S 320 St & Milltary Rd S 0 0 0 0 27 27 52 52 79 79 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy 5 27 18 35 52 17 0 0 9 79 79 3640 SW 3301h St & 1 Av S 27 18 35 52 17 0 0 9 79 79 4028 SW 336th St & 21 st Av SW 17 9 17 9 17 51 27 9 78 78 4043 S 336 Sl & 1 W S 17 27 52 9 0 69 36 0 105 105 4050 S 336 St & Pacific H S 27 27 52 0 96 148 50 50 225 225 4132 10 Av SW & SW Campus Or 36 36 70 70 0 0 0 0 106 106 4150 SR 99 & 16 Av S Connector 0 157 0 0 157 0 0 0 157 157 4250 16 Av S & Pacific Hwy S 157 157 0 82 a 0 82 0 239 239 4251 16 Av S & 16 Av S Connector 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 82 82 4840 SW Cam us Or & 1 Av S 0 0 0 0 96 96 64 64 160 160 484$ S 3481h St & Pacific Hwy S B7 226 119 46 122 9 17 64 345 345 S 3481h St & 16 Av S 70 140 72 36 0 36 70 0 212 212 SW 356 St & 21st Av SW 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 E5261 S 356 St & Pacific H S 52 67 45 18 3S 27 0 0 132 132 S 356 St & Enchanted Pkv 0 58 58 i g 2014 AM PP Volumes Alt 1 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific H S 2140 1730 680 710 520 1150 660 420 4000 4000 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 480 550 1550 1490 710 710 2740 2740 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 650 1620 0 0 1436 1180 1360 840 3440 3440 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 1410 1270 290 400 1280 930 1050 1440 4040 4040 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 820 1590 830 780 1120 10 0 410 2780 2780 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 1340 1060 560 550 1420 1480 450 690 3780 3780 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 840 800 580 770 1890 1 B30 510 420 3820 3820 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ram 0 0 1140 760 2300 2020 1530 2190 4970 4970 4050 S 336 St & Pacific H S 1330 1080 790 710 870 680 570 1090 3560 3560 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 390 42 2260 I 470 I 1170 990 320 260 2140 2140 Sum of 2Uuy w AM I rlpsfuy-14 AM bacKgroutio growth+2014 FWL;Q growth 2014 AM PP Volumes Alt 2 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 2160 1740 680 1 700 520 1150 660 420 4010 4010 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 480 550 1560 1490 710 710 2750 2750 59 S 272 St & I.5 NB Rams 650 1630 0 0 1440 1190 1360 640 3450 3450 60 5 272 St & Militafy Rd S 1420 1270 290 400 1280 940 1050 1440 4050 4050 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 850 1620 830 770 1120 10 0 410 2800 2800 3028 SW 320 St & 21 st Av SW 1340 1050 580 550 1420 1470 450 690 3770 3770 3040 SW 320 SI & 1 Av S 840 800 580 770 1680 1820 610 420 3810 3810 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 1130 770 2350 2060 1510 2160 4990 4990 4050 5 336 St & Pacific Hwy 5 1 1330 1080 800 710 1 870 680 1 570 1090 3570 3570 4218 S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 390 420 260 470 1 1170 990 J 320 260 2140 2140 2014 AM PP Volumes Alt 3 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southibound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT-- IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN I OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 2110 1700 630 640 510 1140 640 420 3900 3900 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0 0 460 550 1550 1480 710 690 2720 2720 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 650 1620 0 0 1430 1170 1350 640 3430 3430 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 1410 1260 290 390 1260 930 1050 1440 4010 4020 1651 S Dash Point Rd & Pacific Hwy S 780 1560 710 640 1110 0 0 400 2600 2600 3026 SW 320 St & 21st Av SW 1270 1030 560 530 1360 1360 410 680 3600 3600 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 800 800 580 790 1740 1620 520 430 3640 3640 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 1 0 0 1090 740 2180 1920 1350 1960 4620 4620 405D S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S 1220 930 710 640 810 1 680 570 1060 3310 3310 421 B S 340 St & Hoyt Rd SW 390 420 260 470 1130 1 950 320 250 2100 2090 290 } 2009 SAT Base Counts Syn INTID 152 Location 1 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT S 272nd St & Paclftc Hwy S 1425 985 1424 1537 610 1177 839 599 4298 4298 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 0 0 691 451 1142 1165 582 799 2415 2415 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 317 906 0 0 1111 776 793 539 2221 2221 60 S 272nd St & Military Rd S 562 350 397 518 819 665 708 953 2485 2485 2550 S 312 St& Pacific HM S 1404 1416 1374 1328 729 721 858 899 4364 4364 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 1707 1383 1371 1655 514 642 524 436 4116 4116 3040 SW 320 $1& 1 Av S 1117 721 540 829 1308 1685 1536 1265 4501 4501 3050 S 320 St& Pacific Hwy S 1181 1669 1683 1434 1793 1657 1761 1657 6418 6418 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 542 1069 885 774 1950 1777 2127 1884 5504 5504 3055 S 320 St& 23 Av S 552 722 758 722 1829 2364 2831 2162 5971 5971 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 907 819 2599 2074 1728 2342 5235 5235 3058 S 320 St & 320. 1-5 NB Ramp 1 737 121 0 954 2079 1233 1202 1710 4018 4018 3350 S 324 St& Pack H 5 1445 1149 1449 1489 430 676 580 589 3904 3904 4218 1 SW 3401h St & Hoyt Rd SW 399 245 305 459 1 745 821 1 635 1 559 2064 2084 2009-14 SAT background Growth Factors Syn INTID Locatlon Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total 1N OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN I OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6°% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 60 S 272nd St & Military Rd S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 2750 S 316 SL & Pacific Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6°% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 5.6°% 5.6% 5.6% 1 5.6°% 5.6% 5.66/. 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3050 S 320 St & Pack Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 6.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 5.6% 5.66/. 5.6% 5.6% 5.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.611/. 5.6% 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6°% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.5 % 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 6.6% 5,6% 5.6% 5.6°% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 4218 SW 3401h St & Ho Rd SW 5.6% 5.6% 5-6°1° 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6°Jo Annual growth rate = 1.1 % from: sat 98 VOLUME.dat (1230-05 by Rick Perez) 5-year growth rate = (1+1.1 %)^5 1 = 5.6% 2014 SAT Base = 2009 SAT Counts x BGF Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific Hwy S 1505 1041 1504 1623 645 1243 886 633 4539 4539 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 0 0 730 476 1206 1231 615 843 2550 2550 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 335 957 0 0 1174 820 838 569 2346 2346 60 S 272nd St & Milltxy Rd S 594 369 419 547 865 703 747 1006 2625 2625 2550 S 312 St& Pacific Hn S 1483 1496 1451 1402 770 762 906 949 4610 4610 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 1803 1450 1448 1748 543 678 553 461 4348 4346 3040 SW 320 St&1 Av S 1180 762 570 876 1381 1779 1622 1336 4754 4754 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 1247 1763 1777 1515 1894 1750 1860 1750 6778 6778 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 572 1129 985 818 2059 1876 2247 1990 5813 5813 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 583 763 801 763 1932 2497 2990 2284 6307 6307 S 320 St & 1.5 SS - 320 Ram 0 0 958 865 2746 2191 1825 2473 5529 5529 $ 320 St & 320 - I.5 NO Ram 779 128 0 1007 2196 1302 1270 11106 4244 4244 r3350 S 324 St& Pacific H S 1526 1214 1531 1573 454 714 612 623 4123 4123 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW L 422 259 1 322 1 485 1 787 867 670 590 2201 2201 291 2009 SAT Distribution AM Syn INTIP Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1,5% 1.5% 2.3% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 4.9% 4,9% 57 S 272 St & 1-5 813 Rams 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1-1% 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 0.3% 071% 0,0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% DA% 0.4% 60 S 272 St & Mililary Rd S 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.8% 0.8% 2550 5 312 St & Pacific S 9.3% 3.7% 9.0% 9,6% 3.6% 11.9% 4.6% 1.2% 26.4% 26.4% 2750 5 316 St & Pacific Hwy$ 11.8% 11.4% 10.4% 7.7% 0.0% 5.5% 2.3% 0.0% 24.6% 1 24.6% 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2,6% 0.2% 0.7% 0.7% 10.9% 14.2% 3.7% 2.8% 17.9% 17.9% 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 8.7% 14.8% 8.1% 16% 16.2% 17.0% 6.9% 4.5% 39.8% 39.8% 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 8.5% 5.9% 3.3% 16.8% 16.5% 6.8% 8.0% 6.9%. 36.3% 36.30/. 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 0.3% 1.6% 1.3% 0.1% 8.6% 9.1 % 15_1 % 14.5% 25.3% 25.3% 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0.0% 0,0% 2.8% 1,2% 8.5% 7.2% 11.3% 14.1 % 22.6% 22.61/6 3058 S 320 St & 320 - I-5 NB Ram 0.0% 0,0% 0.0% 2.8% 7.2% 4.4% 11.3% 11.3' 18.6% 18.6% 3350 S 324 St & Paciflc H S 12.3% 8.5% 3,3% 5.0% 0.5% 4.7% 2.6% 0.5% 112 6% 18.60/0 4218 SW 3401h St & Ho Rd SW 0.0% 0.0% 1 0.0% 0.0% j 3.0% 1. 3.00% 0.5% 0.5% 3.6% 3.6% Iuway it, uva yiu- uy appivacu 2009 SAT Distribution AIt2 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1.9% 1.9% 2.2% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 5.1% 5.1% 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.4°% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 1.0% 1.0% 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 9.5% 4.3% 8.6% 9.3% 1 3.3% 10.8% 4.1% 1 1.1% 25.5% 25.5% 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 13.2% 12.4% 10.4% 8.2% 0.0% 5.3°% 2.3% 0.0% 2610% 26.0°% 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 2.4% 0.2% 0.6% 0.7% 10.3% 13.4% 3.5% 2A% 16.9% 16.9% 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 9.3% 15.6% 9.1% 4.4% 15.30/4 16.0% 6.8% 4.4% 40.5% 40.5% 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 8.5% 5.5% 3.1% 13,8% 15.2% 7.5% 6.8% 6.8% 33.6% 316% 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 0.4% 1.5% 1-8% 0.2% 11.0% 12.2% 13.4% 12.6% 26.5% 26,5% 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ram 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 1.7% 11.8% 10.1 % 10,3% 12.6% 24.4% 24,4% 30581 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 0.0% 0.0% 1 0.0% 4.9% 10.1% 5.2% 10.3% 10.3% 20.3% 20.3% 3350 S 324 St & Pacific H S 12.3% 9.0% 4.1 % 5.7% 0.5% 4,2% 2.6% 0.6% 19.1% 19.5% 4218 SW 340th St & HoytRd SW 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 3,0% 0.5% 0,5% 3.5% 3.5°/a 2009 SAT Distribution AIt3 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 1.6% 1.6% 1.5% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 3.4% 3.4% 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 010% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0,0% 0,0% 03% 0.3% 0.3% 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.8% 0.8% 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 8.2% 3.9% 7.2% 9.0% 3.3% 8.5% 3.8% 1.0% 22.4% 22.4% 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 11.4% 11.4% 9.8% 7.2% 0.0% 4.6% 2.0% 0.0% 23.2% 23.2% 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 3.1 % 0.2% 0.8% 6.7% 14.0% 18.0% 3.6% 2.8% 21.5% 21.5% 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 9.0% 14.0% 7.7% 4.4% 19.9% 20.9°% 7.3% 4.6% 43.9% 43.9% 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 8.7% 6.2% 3,3% 15.3% 18.6% 9.3% 7.2% 6.9% 37.7% 37.7% 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 0.7°% 1.5% 2.0% 0.2% 9.1 % 10.6% 11.6% 11.1 % 23.3% 23.3% 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0.0% 0.0 0 1.50 1.0% 10.0% 9.0% 9.3% 10.8% 20.7% 20.7% 3058 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 3.9% 9.0% 5.1% 9.1% 9,5% 18.4% 18.4% 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 13.4% 8.8% 4.2% 6.9% 0.7% 5.7% 3.8% 0.7% 1 22.0% 22.0% 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW j 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.7% 5.7% 0.8% 0.8% 1 6.5% 6.5% 292 2014 SAT Growth AIt1 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific Hwy S 38 38 59 86 0 0 26 1 0 123 124 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 0 0 26 1 1 0 0 26 27 27 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 8 2 0 0 0 8 2 0 10 10 60 S 272nd SI & Mill ta!y Rd S 5 2 2 8 a 8 5 3 20 21 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 235 95 229 243 90 303 116 30 670 671 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 300 289 265 196 0 139 59 1 0 624 624 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 65 5 19 18 276 359 94 70 454 452 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hn S 222 375 205 90 411 431 174 115 1012 1011 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 216 150 84 425 418 172 204 175 922 922 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 8 41 34 4 217 230 382 367 641 642 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 70 32 214 183 287 358 571 573 31059 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Rarn 0 0 0 72 184 112 287 287 471 471 3356 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 312 214 as 127 13 1 119 66 1 13 474 473 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 0 0 0 0 77 1 77 14 1 14 91 1 91 Mulbiolicaticn of 2009 distribution X 09.14 growth 2537 FWCC trio aenaration increase • 2009 to 2014 - Distribute 070504.xiv 2014 SAT Growth AIt2 Syn 1NTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN 1 OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd SI & Pacific Hwy S 48 48 55 81 0 0 26 0 129 129 57 5 272nd St & 1-5 $9 Ramp 0 0 26 1 1 0 0 26 27 27 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 9 3 0 0 0 9 3 0 12 12 60 S 272nd St & Military Rd S 7 2 2 10 9 110 6 3 24 25 2550 S 312 SI & Pacific Hwy S 241 110 217 236 85 273 104 29 647 648 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 336 315 264 208 0 135 59 0 659 658 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 61 5 16 17 262 340 88 67 427 429 3050 S 320 SI & Pacific Hwy S 237 396 230 112 387 406 172 112 1026 1026 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 214 140 79 349 386 191 173 172 852 852 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 9 38 45 5 280 310 339 321 673 674 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 60 43 298 2:55 260 321 618 619 3058 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 0 0 0 123 255 132 260 260 515 515 3350 S 324 St & Pacific H S 313 229 104 144 14 106 65 15 496 494 421$ SW 340ih St & Ho Rd SVV 0 0 0 0 76 76 13 13 89 1 89 2538 FWCC: trip oeneration increase - 2009 to 2014 - Distribute 070504 2014 SAT Growth AIt3 Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific Hwy S 7 7 6 a 0 0 1 0 14 15 57 S 272nd Si & I-5 SB Ramp 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 59 5 272nd St & 1.5 NB Ramp 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 60 S 272nd St & MIli la Rd S 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 3 4 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 36 17 31 39 14 37 16 4 97 97 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 50 50 43 31 0 20 9 0 102 101 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 14 1 4 3 61 78 1t} 12 95 94 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 39 61 34 19 87 91 32 20 192 191 3052 $ 320 Sl & 20 Av S 38 27 14 67 81 41 31 30 164 165 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 3 6 9 1 40 46 51 48 103 101 3057 S 320 SI & 1.5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 6 4 43 39 41 47 90 90 3058 S $20 St & 320 -1.5 NB Ramp, 1 0 0 17 39 22 1 40 41 80 80 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 58 39 19 30 3 25 16 3 96 11 97 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 0 0 0 0 25__j 25 1 4 29 L 29 437 F• W[:G trip generation Increase - L0U,4 10 2U14 - UI5VIDUt6 it rttbtl4 3/10/2006 293 2004-09 to 2014 AM & SAT v12c.xls Sat volumes revised 1-06-06 jd.pdf 2009 SAT Growth AM Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT I TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 42 66 29 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 29 1 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 9 2 601 S 272 St & Military Rd S 2 2 2 2 7 21 5 1 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 15 65 181 101 153 541 461 71 181 40 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 1 278 551 991 195 22 43 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 72 21 306 20 78 6 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 165 81 108 71 48 167 289 29 80 84 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 96 44 100 6 47 40 114 85 265 160 58 8 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 8 1 26 1 11 91 229 3 388 36 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 78 203 351 319 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp 124 80 319 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 223 12311 3 81 8 8 6 60 6 7 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 1 85 15 2009 SAT Growth AIt2 Syn INTO Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L7 I TH I RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 53 61 29 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 29 1 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Rams 10 3 601 S 272 St & Military Rd S 1 2 5 2 6 4 5 2 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 16 85 167 88 153 48 461 63 161 37 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 3091 64 86 207 1 24 41 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 68 18 291 19 74 5 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 182 81 112 91 52 172 258 33 72 86 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 911 41 106 8 42 38 102 98 228 118 62 12 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 8 2 42 1 7 5 302 4 341 35 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 67 283 481 289 3058 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 146 137 289 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 238 109 31 101 11 6 59 6 7 4218 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW H 84 14 2009 SAT Growth AIt3 Syn INTID Location Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT 52 S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S 10 9 2 57 S 272 St & 1-5 SB Rams 2 59 S 272 St & 1-5 NB Ramps 2 1 60 S 272 St & Military Rd S 1 1 2 1 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 3 17 30 131 31 9 11 13 31 7 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 1 61 9 191 41 3 9 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 19 51 86 4 17 1 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 31 24 211 171 9 391 83 10 19 16 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 21 7 25 4 7 9 251 28 61 26 12 6 3055 S 320 St & 23 Av S 3 1 11 1 11 54 1 64 7 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 9 55 6 57 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ramp 2 31 24 56 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 1 1 50 32 1 23 2 2 2 19 2 2 42181 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 351 5 224 2014 SAT PP Volumes AM Syn INTID Location Northbound Souhbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific Hwy S 1590 1120 1630 1800 640 1250 940 630 4800 4800 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 0 0 780 480 1210 1240 610 900 2600 2620 59 S 272nd St & 1.5 NB Rarne 360 960 0 0 1170 840 850 570 2360 2370 60 S 272nd St & Mil[lary Rd S 610 370 420 570 880 720 750 1020 2660 2680 2550 S 312 SI & Pacific Hwy S 1970 1690 1940 1920 960 1400 1150 1010 6020 6020 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hw yS 2440 2070 2000 2160 540 980 680 1 460 5660 5670 3040 SW 320 St &, 1 Av S 1320 780 610 916 1960 2530 1820 1480 5710 5700 3050 S 320 St & Paclflc Hwy S 1720 2550 2210 1700 2760 2660 2220 2000 8910 8910 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 1030 1 1440 1110 1720 2940 2240 2670 2360 7750 7760 3055 S 320 St 8. 23 Av S 600 860 880 770 2390 2980 3790 3060 7660 7660 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 1110 930 3200 2580 2430 3230 6740 6740 3058 S 320 St & 320 -1-5 NB Ram 780 130 0 1160 2580 1540 1870 2410 5230 5240 3350 S 324 St& Pacific H S 2180 1670 1700 1840 4B0 970 750 650 5110 5130 4218 SW 3401h Sf & HW Rd SW 420 260 330 490 950 1030 700 1 620 2400 2400 i--... -- ---- - --- • -- ' ' ---- -+."-.._ "......... y.....-. 2014 SAT PP Volumes Alt2 Syn INTID Location Northhcund Soulhbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd St & Paclfrc Hwy S 1610 1140 1620 1800 640 1250 940 630 4810 4820 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 0 0 780 480 1210 1240 610 900 2600 2620 59 S 272nd St & 1-5 NB Ramp 360 960 0 0 1170 840 850 570 238D 2370 60 S 272nd St & Mill lary Rd S 610 370 420 570 890 730 760 1020 2680 2690 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 1990 1730 1910 1900 950 1330 1120 1010 5970 5970 2750 S 316 $1& Pacific Hwy S 2510 2120 2000 2190 540 960 680 460 5730 5730 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 1310 760 610 1 910 1040 . 2490 1800 1480 5660 5660 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 174,0 2600 2260 1750 2710 2610 2220 1990 8930 8950 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 1020 1420 1100 1550 2880 2280 2610 2360 7610 7610 3055 S 320 51& 23 Av S 600 840 900 780 2520 3150 3710 2960 7730 7730 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ram 0 0 1080 960 3370 2730 2380 3150 6830 6840 3058 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ram 780 130 0 1270 2730 1580 1820 2360 5330 5340 3350 S 324 St & Pacific HwyS 2180 1690 1750 1880 480 330 750 660 5160 -A 4218 SW 340th St & Ho Rd SW 420 260 330 490 950 1020 700 610 2400 2380 2014 SAT PP Volumes Alta Syn INTID Location Northbound Soulhbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN I OUT IN I OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd SI & Pacllic Hwy S 1520 1060 1520 1840 640 1250 890 630 4570 4580 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Rarnp 0 0 730 480 1200 1240 610 850 2540 2570 59 S 272nd Sl & 1-5 NB Ramp 340 960 0 0 1170 820 840 570 2350 2350 60 S 272nd St & Military Rd S 590 370 420 550 870 710 750 1000 2630 2630 2550 S 312 St & Pacific HLwy S 1560 1540 1530 1490 800 850 940 950 4830 4830 2750 S 316 St & Pacific HwX S 1930 1580 1550 1820 540 730 580 460 4600 4590 3040 SW 320 St & 1 Av S 1220 760 570 880 1520 1960 1660 1360 4970 4960 3050 S 320 St& Pacific Hw S 1350 1900 1860 1560 2110 1970 1940 1800 7260 7230 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 660 1200 970 980 2250 1970 2320 2070 6200 6220 3055 S 320 $t& 23 Av S 690 780 820 760 2030 2610 3110 2400 6550 6550 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ram2 0 980 670 2850 2290 1920 2590 5750 5750 3058 S 320 St & 320 - 1-5 NB Ramp 780 130 0 1050 2290 1350 1370 1910 4440 4440 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 1670 1 1300 1580 1640 460 770 650 630 4310 4340 4218 SW 340th St & Ha Rd $W 420 260 330 490 850 930 680 600 1 2280 2280 3/10/2006 295 2004-09 to 2014 AM & SAT v12c.x1s 2014 SAT PP Volumes AM Syn INVID Location Northbound Soulhbound Eastbound Westbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific Hwy S 1 1590 1120 1630 1800 640 1250 940 630 4800 4800 57 5 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 0 0 780 480 1210 1240 610 900 2600 2620 59 S 272nd $I & 1-5 N8 Ramp 350 960 0 0 1170 840 850 670 2380 2370 60 S 272nd St & Vilitary Rd S 610 370 420 570 880 720 750 1020 2660 2680 2550 S 312 Si & Pacifc Hwy S 1970 1690 1940 1920 960 1400 1150 1010 6020 6020 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 2.440 2070 2000 2160 546 980 680 460 S660 5670 3040 SW 320 St& 1 Av S 1320 780 610 910 1960 2530 1820 1480 5710 5700 3050 S 320 St & Pacific Hn S 1720 2550 2210 1700 2760 2660 2220 2000 8910 8910 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 1030 1440 1110 1720 2940 2240 26710 2360 7750 7760 3055 S 320 St& 23 Av S 600 L850 880 770 2390 2980 3790 3060 7660 7660 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB - 320 Ramp 0 0 1110 930 3200 2580 2430 3230 6740 6740 3058 S 320 S1 & 320 .1-5 NB Ra mp 780 130 0 1160 2580 1540 1870 2410 5230 5240 3350 S 324 St& Pacific S 2180 1670 1700 1840 480 970 750 650 5110 5130 4218 SW 3401h SI & Hot Rd 5W 420 250 330 490 950 1030 700 620 2400 2400 ISum of2009 PP Sat volumes+09-14 Background growth+PWGC growth 2014 SAT PP Volumes AIt2 Syn INTIQ Location Northbound Soulhbound Eastbound Wesibound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd SI& Pac1Ac H S 1610 1140 1620 1800 640 1250 940 630 4810 4820 57 S 272nd 31 & 1.5 SB Ramp 0 0 760 480 1210 1240 610 900 2600 2620 59 S 272nd SI & 1-5 N6 Ramp 360 960 0 0 1170 840 850 570 2380 2370 60 S 272nd St & Milliary Rd S 610 370 420 570 890 730 760 1020 2680 2690 2550 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S 1990 1730 1910 1900 950 1330 1120 1010 5970 5970 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 2510 2120 2000 2190 540 960 680 460 5730 5730 3040 SW 320 St& i Av S 1310 780 610 910 1940 2490 1600 1460 5660 6660 3050 S 320 St & Pacirc H 5 1740 2600 2260 1750 2710 2610 2220 1990 8930 8950 3052 S 320 St& 20 Av S 1020 1420 1100 1550 2880 2280 2610 2360 7610 7610 3055 S 320 SI& 23 Av S 600 840 900 780 2520 3150 3710 2960 7730 7730 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 S6 • 320 Rame 0 0 1080 960 3370 2730 2380 3150 6830 6840 3056 S 320 St & 320 - 1.5 N8 Ramp 780 130 0 1270 2730 1580 1820 2360 5330 5340 3350 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 2180 1690 1750 1880 480 930 750 660 5160 5160 4218 1 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 420 260 330 490 950 1020 700 j 610 2400 1 2380 2014 SAT PP Volumes Alt3 Syn INTIQ Location Northbound Soulhbound Eastbound Woslbound Total IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 52 S 272nd St & Pacific J-1vq S 1520 1060 1520 1640 640 1250 890 630 4570 4580 57 S 272nd St & 1-5 SB Ramp 0 0 730 480 1200 1240 610 850 2540 2570 59 S 272nd St & t-5 NB Ramp 340 960 0 0 1170 820 840 570 2350 2350 60 S 272nd Si & Militaa Rd S 1590 370 420 550 870 710 750 1000 2630 2630 2550 S 312 St & Pacific IM S 1560 1540 1530 1490 800 850 940 950 4830 4830 2750 S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S 1930 1580 1550 1820 540 730 580 460 4600 4590 3040 $W 320 St& 1 Av S 1220 760 570 880 1520 1960 1660 1360 4970 4960 3050 S 320 St & Paeifit Hwy S 1350 1900 1860 1560 2110 1970 1940 1800 7260 7230 3052 S 320 St & 20 Av S 660 1200 970 980 2250 1970 2320 2070 6200 6220 3055 5 320 St& 23 Av S 590 780 820 760 2030 2610 3110 2400 6550 6550 3057 S 320 St & 1-5 SB • 320 Ramp 0 0 980 870 2850 2290 1920 2590 5750 5750 3058 1 S 320 St & 320 • 1-5 N9 Ramp 780 130 0 1050 2290 1350 1370 1910 4440 4440 3350 1 S 324 St & Pacific Hwy S 1670 1300 1580 1640 460 770 650 630 4360 4340 4218 1 SW 340th St & Hoyt Rd SW 420 260 330 490 850 930 680 1 600 2280 2280 296 3/10/2006 2004-09 to 2014 AM & SAT v12c.x1s Final EIS City of Federal Way City center Planned Action EIS September 2006 Prepared for: 44k CITY OF Federal Way Prepared by: MJones &Stokes CITY OF Federal September 8, 2006 CITY HALL 33325 81h Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Way Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com The City of Federal Way has prepared this City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). Pursuant to State SEPA laws and rules, the City issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) on July 26, 2006. A 30-day comment period followed the DEIS issuance, during which time verbal and written comment were accepted on the DEIS. A public meeting on the DEIS was held on July 13, 2006. This FEIS includes all comments received during the comment period, responses to comments, and corrections and revisions to the DEIS. The planned action project area is located in the City Center Sub -area of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312`h Street; on the south by South 3241h Street; on the west by Pacific Highway South and on the east by 23rd Avenue South. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: 1. Adoption of an ordinance designating a portion of the City Center sub -area as a planned action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a) and WAC 197-11-164. The planned action designation would apply to proposed residential, retail, office, hotel, civic and structured parking development falling within the development envelope analyzed in this EIS. 2. Adoption of a new height of structure standard for multi -unit housing in the City Center Core (CC-C), including area outside of the planned action project area. The action alternatives consider height standards of 200' and 145.' The No Action Alternative would not change the existing height standard. Paper and CD copies may be purchased at FedEx Kinko's Office and Print Center, 31823 Gateway Center Blvd S, Federal Way. The approximate cost of a black and white paper copy of the Draft EIS is $6.70. CD copies are also available for approximately $5.00. The document will also be posted on the City's website: www.cityoffederalway.corn. Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Patrick Doherty at 253-835-2612. Sincerely, Patrick Doherty Economic Development Director City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final EIS Prepared for: 41 CITY Of Federal Way Prepared by: %S^ Jones & Stokes September 2006 7 Fact Sheet Project Title City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Proposed Action and Alternatives Proposed Action The action proposed by the City of Federal Way consists of the following related actions by the City of Federal Way City Council: I . Adoption of an ordinance designating a portion of the City Center sub -area as a planned 9 action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant 1 to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a) and WAC 197-11-164. The planned action designation would apply to proposed residential, retail, office, hotel, civic, and structured parking development falling within the development envelope analyzed in this EIS. Two action alternatives (Alternatives 1 and 2) assume the comparable development levels but distribute growth differently. Alternative 1 assumes that growth is focused around South 320`h Street. Alternative 2 distributes future growth more evenly around the project area. 2. Adoption of a new height of structure standard for multi -unit housing in the City Center Core (CC-C), including area outside of the planned action project area. No Planned Action Alternative The No Action Alternative (Alternative 3) assumes the level and distribution of growth established in the Comprehensive Plan. The existing standard for height of multi -unit structures in the City Center Core zone would continue unchanged. ? Comprehensive Plan EIS The City of Federal Way completed an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the City's GMA Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations in 1995. This Planned Action EIS incorporates by reference the analysis contained in the 1995 Comprehensive Plan EIS as it relates to the City Center sub -area. Location The planned action project area is located in the City Center of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312`h Street; on the south by South 324`h Street; on the west by Pacific Highway South and on the east by 23rd Avenue South. The proposed Zoning Code amendment would apply to the entire City Center Core zoning designation. Proponent City of Federal Way Date of Implementation 2006, with phased development following necessary permit approvals Lead Agency City of Federal Way Responsible Official Kathy McClung, Director, Community Development Services Department Contact Person Patrick Doherty, Economic Development Director 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 253.835-2612 patrickd@cityoffederalway.com Required Approvals ■ Planned Action Designation and Ordinance Adoption ■ Adoption of Zoning Code Amendment for Multi -Unit Residential Structures in the City Center Core Zone EIS Authors and Principal Contributors The Final EIS has been prepared under the direction of the City of Federal Way. Principal Authors: Jones & Stokes 11820 Northup Way, Suite E300 Bellevue, WA 98005-1946 425.822.1077 Contributing Authors: City of Federal Way Public Works Department (transportation) Mirai Associates 11410 NE 122❑d Way, Suite 320 Kirkland WA 98034 425.820.0100 (Transportation) Otak 117 South Main Street, Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98104 206.442.1371 (sketches) Public Comment A public comment period was held between June 26, 2006 and July 25, 2006, during which time written comment on the Draft EIS was invited. A public meeting regarding the DEIS was held on July 13, 2006 for interested parties to provide verbal comment. Date of Draft EIS Issuance June 26, 2006 Date of Final EIS Issuance September 8, 2006 Final EIS Purchase Price Paper and CD copies may be purchased at FedEx Kinko's Office and Print Center, 31823 Gateway Center Blvd S, Federal Way. The approximate cost of a black and white paper copy of the Final EIS is $6.70 plus tax. CD copies are also available for approximately $5.00. Previous Environmental Documents City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan EIS, including the following documents; CityShape From Vision to Plan Comprehensive Plan Draft EIS, issued November 19, 1993 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan & Development Regulations Final EIS, issued July 1995 Development Regulations to Implement the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan EIS Addendum, issued June 1995 Location of Background Information City of Federal Way Community Development Services Department. See Lead Agency and Responsible Official Address listed above. 1 1 1 I I J j j I City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final EIS Prepared for: City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98063 Prepared by: � n Jones & Stokes 11820 Northup Way, Suite E300 Bellevue, Washington 98005-1946 425/822-1077 September 2006 Table of Contents Chapter1 Summary.........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Proposed Action and Location................................................................................1-1 ProposedAction......................................................................................................1-1 Location 1-1 1.3 Description of Alternatives......................................................................................1-2 Alternative1............................................................................................................1-2 Alternative2............................................................................................................1-2 Alternative 3 (No Action).........................................................................................1-3 1.4 Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures........................................1-3 1.5 Issues to Be Resolved..........................................................................................1-14 1.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ................................. ....................... ..... 1-14 Chapter 2 Description of the Proposal and Alternatives..............................................2-1 2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................2-1 Overview of the Proposed Action............................................................................2-1 Background.............................................................................................................2-3 Objectivesof the Proposal......................................................................................2-5 2.2 Planning Process....................................................................................................2-7 GrowthManagement Act........................................................................................2-7 City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan ..............................................................2-7 . Development Regulations.......................................................................................2-7 2.3 Planned Action Process.......................................................................................... 2-9 Planned Action Overview......................................................... ............................... 2-9 PlannedAction EIS.................................................................................................2-9 Planned Action Ordinance......................................................................................2-9 2.4 Environmental Review..........................................................................................2-10 Comprehensive Plan EIS......................................................................................2-10 Scopeof Review................................................................................................... 2-10 2.5 Proposed Action and Alternatives......................................................... ................ 2-11 Overview........................................................................................................-•.....2-11 Alternative1..........................................................................................................2-14 Alternative2..........................................................................................................2-15 Alternative3..........................................................................................................2-16 2.6 Benefits and Disadvantages of Delaying Proposed Action...................................2-17 2.7 Major Issues to be Resolved ................................................... .............................. 2-17 Chapter3 Errata...............................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Revisions to DEIS Air Quality Analysis ............................................. ...................... 3-1 3.2 Revisions to DEIS Land Use Analysis....................................................................3-2 3.3 Revisions to DEIS Aesthetics, Light and Glare Analysis. ........................................ 3-8 3.4 Revisions to DEIS Transportation Analysis ................................................. ...... ......3-9 3.5 Revisions to DEIS Public Services Analysis ................................................... ...... 3-12 3.6 Corrections Utilities Analysis.................................................................................3-14 City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS Chapter 4 Comments and Responses............................................................................4-1 4.1 Public Comments....................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Responses to Comments......................................................................................4-11 Chapter5 References......................................................................................................5-1 5.1 Printed References.................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Personal Communications ................. ..................................................................... 5-2 Appendix 1. Distribution List Appendix List of Tables NOTE: DEIS table numbers have been retained in this Final EIS in order to allow for ease of cross- referencinQ between the Draft and Final EIS documents. Where table numbers are skipped i.e. 3-1. 3-6 the intervenine tables are not included in this FEIS and will be found only in the DEIS. Table 1-1. Summary of Potential Impacts of Proposed Action and No Action Alternative --- ..... 1-4 Table 2-1. Planned Action Development Envelope..................................................................2-1 Table 2-2. Alternative 1 (South 320t" Street Focus)................................................................2-14 Table 2-3. Alternative 1 (South 320t" Street Focus)................................................................2-14 Table 2-4. Alternative 2 (Distributed Development)................................................................2-15 Table 2-5. Alternative 2 (Distributed Development)................................................................2-15 Table 2-6. Alternative 3 (No Action)........................................................................................2-16 Table 2-7. Alternative 3 (No Action)........................................................................................2-16 Table 3-1. National and State of Washington Ambient Air Quality Standards ..........................3-1 Table 3-6. Vacant and Redevelopable Land Summary ............................................................3-4 Table 3-7. City Center Core Permitted Uses and Development Standards..............................3-5 Table 3-8. City Center Frame Permitted Uses and Development Standards ...........................3-6 Table 3-23. Alternative 1 and 2 Parking Requirement....................................................... ..... 3-10 Table 3-30. Intersection Operations by Peak Hour with Mitigation(2009).......................... .... 3-11 Table 3-31. Calls for Service in City Center Project Area.......................................................3-12 Table 3-32. Traffic Enforcement Activity 2005........................................................................3-13 City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS Table 3-34. Water and Sewer Service Demand Estimates ... .................... ................ .............. 3-14 List of Figures NOTE: DEIS figure numbers have been retained in this Final EIS in order to allow for ease of cross- referencing between the Draft and Final EIS documents. Where figure numbers are skipped (i.e., 5, 7), the intervening tables are not included in this FEIS and will be found on ly in the DEIS. DEIS figures 9 — 21 are found only in the Draft EIS. Figure 1. City Center Sub Area..............................................................................................2-2 Figure 2. City Center Zoning Designations ....... .............. ....................................................... 2-4 Figure 3. Redevelopment Concepts......................................................................................2-6 Figure 4. City Center Analysis Blocks.......................................................... ........................ 2-12 Figure 5. Overview of Alternatives.......................................................................................2-13 Figure 7. Vacant and Redevelopable Land............................................................................3-3 Figure 8. Comprehensive Plan Designations. .......................................................... ....3-7 City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS Chapter 1 Summary I i 1.1 Introduction This chapter summarizes information contained in this Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). It contains a summary of the alternatives, significant impacts, mitigation measures, and significant unavoidable adverse impacts. This summary is intentionally brief, the reader should consult individual sections of their Draft EIS for detailed infornation concerning the affected environment, impacts and mitigation measures. Text that has been inserted or deleted since the Draft EIS is shown in cross -out or underline format : 1.2 Proposed Action and Location Proposed Action The Proposed Action consist of two related elements: ■ Adoption of an ordinance designating a portion of the City Center sub -area as a "planned action" for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a) and WAC 197-11-164. The planned action would apply to t residential, retail, office, lodging, civic and structured parking development projects - falling within the development envelope and project area analyzed in this EIS. The planned action designation would apply to development that occurs through 2014. a J This action may also include procedural text amendments to the Federal Way Municipal Code (FWMC) Chapter 22 (Zoning Code) to recognize the Planned Action designation + and process. These changes are not expected to have an environmental impact and are not discussed further in this EIS. ■ Adoption of a new structure height standard for multi -unit housing in the City Center Core zoning designation in the City Center sub -area. Location _ The City Center project area is located within the City of Federal Way; bounded on the south by South 324`h Street; on the north by South 312`h Street; on the west by Pacific Highway South; and on the east by 23'a Avenue South. For the purpose of this EIS the planned action project area has been divided into three smaller analysis areas, referred to as Blocks 1, 2 and 3: City Center Planned Action 1 1 Draft Planned Action EIS ■ Block 1 consists of the northern portion of the project area and is bounded on the north by S 312th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by South 316th Street and on the east by 23td Avenue S; ■ Block 2 is located in the central portion of the project area and is bounded on the north by S 316th Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by S 320th Street and on the east by 23rd Avenue S.; and ■ Block 3 located in the southern portion of the project area and consists mainly of The Commons at Federal Way. Block 3 is bounded on the north by S 3201h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by S 324t1' Street and on the east by 23"d Avenue S. The proposed change to the height standard for multi -unit residential structures would apply to all area within the City -Center Core zone. This area is generally bounded by Pacific Highway South on the west, South 324th Street on the south, Interstate 5 on the east and South 316`h and 317`h streets on the north. 1.3 Description of Alternatives -I his 1r1S describes two action alternatives and one no -action alternative for the proposed action. These different scenarios are intended to allow the City to test the impacts of two different growth patterns and to bracket the range of growth that is likely to occur within the project area. if adopted, the planned action designation would based on the total development envelope described in Chapter 2. AdODtion of a specific action alternative is not necessa for implementation of the ro osal. Similarly. the alternative height scenarios are associated with different alternatives for the Purpose of analvsis in this EIS. They are not dependent on either alternative and the Citv may adopt cither height standard regardless of any decisions related to the Planned action designation. Alternative 1 The proposed land use pattern would create a dense, mixed -use urban neighborhood within the City Center. Growth would be focused around South 320th Street, with 47% of the new growth occurring in Block 2 and 41% in Block 3. This alternative would increase the permitted structure height for multi -unit housing in the City Center Core to 200 feet. Alternative 2 The proposed land use pattern in Alternative 2 would be similar to Alternative 1, however, growth would be distributes more evenly throughout the project area. Under this Alternative, approximately 30% of the new growth would occurring in Block 3, with the remaining growth spread between Blocks 1 and 2. This alternative would increase the permitted structure height for multi -unit housing in the City Center Core to 145 feet. City Center Planned Action 1-2 Draft Planned Action EIS I Alternative 3 No Action Alternative 3 assumes the level and distribution of growth will continued as currently Iestablished in the Comprehensive Plan. Existing structure height standards would continue unchanged. 1.4 Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Table 1-1 provides a summary of the environmental impacts for each element of the environment evaluated in Chapter 3 of the Draft EIS. For a complete discussion of the .� elements of the environment considered in the Draft EIS, please refer to Draft EIS Chapter 3. City Center Planned Action 1-3 Draft Planned Action EIS Table 1-1. Summary of Potential Impacts of Proposed Action and No Action Alternative Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Proposed Action South 320th Street Focus Distributed Development No Action Air Quality Short Term Impacts Impacts Common to All Alternatives Impacts during construction Temporary, localized impacts caused by fugitive dust during construction Short term and localized odors could result during paving ❑ erati❑ns using tar and asphalt Odors Exhaust emissions Emissions would be temporary and localized Long Term Impacts Carbon monoxide tCOJ Alternative 1 is predicted to generate CO concentrations expected to be less than CO concentrations expected to be less than concentrations higher vehicle trips than any other Alternative 1. Alternative 1. alternative. CO concentrations at each intersection modeled for Alternative 1 are all below the allowable ambient air quality standards. Thus, no significant operational air quality impacts are expected. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-4 C_ 3osed Action on Measures Short Term Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 South 320th Street Focus Distributed Development I No Action Construction activities related to development approved under the Planned Action Designation could generate fugitive dust, which could be mitigated using the following best management practices: Use water sprays or other non -toxic dust control methods on unpaved roadways. Minimize vehicle speed while traveling on unpaved surfaces. • Prevent trackout of mud onto public streets. • Cover soil piles when practical. To the extent practical, minimize work during periods of high winds. • Burning of slash or demolition debris is not permitted without express approval from the Puget Sound Clean Air Autharity JPSCAA . No slash burning is anticipated for any construction projects in the City Center. Mobile construction equipment and portable stationary engines would emit air pollutants including nitrogen dioxide (Noxl, CO, and particulate matter smaller than 10 microns (PM101. These emissions would be temporary and localized. It is highly unlikely that the temporary emissions would cause ambient concentrations at adjoining parcels to approach the Nn'ti gin.,i Ambient Air Quality Standards jNAAQSI limits. Typical mitigation measures to minimize air quality and odor issues caused by tailpipe emissions include the following: • Maintain the engines of construction equipment according to manufacturers' specifications. Minimize idling of equipment while the equipment is not in use. ng Term CO concentrations modeled for this air quality assessment account for intersection improvements already included as part of the proposed action to mitigate traffic impacts. analysis presented in this section indicates all of the project alternatives would result in compliance with applicable carbon monoxide standards. Consequently, no significant quality impacts would be expected, and no consideration of special air quality mitigation measures is necessary. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-5 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Proposed Action South 320th Street Focus Distributed Development No Action 3.2 Land Use Land Use Patterns Focus of new growth New development will be focused in Similar total amount of development as Development will increase and diversify in the Blocks 2 and 3. Block 1 will also Alternative 1 but development will be more project area but to a significantly lesser degree than experience new growth but at a evenly distributed throughout the project area. under the other Alternatives. relatively lower level than in Blocks 2 Block 1 would experience greater growth and and 3. diversity of uses than in Alternative 1, but the overall development levels on Block 1 would continue to be less intensive than Blocks 2 and 3. New development through 2014 New retails ace: 750,000 sf Same as Alternative 1 220,270 sf New offices ace: 1 350,000 sf Same as Alternative 1 104,446 sf New hotel rooms: 600 Same as Alternative 1 New residential units: 750 Same as Alternative 1 270 New structured parking stalls: 750 Same as Alternative 1 Civic Uses: 100,000 sf Same as Alternative 1 Impacts Common to All Alternatives Land use patterns will intensify and the mix of uses will increase to create a greater diversity in land use pattern. Over time, the scale of buildings may also increase as new development occurs and building heights are maximized along with density consisted with the Zoning Code. Land Use Compatibility City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-6 r ulti-Unit Residential Structure :ommon to All Alternatives All Alternatives Measures Alternative 1 South 320th Street Focus Proposed increase to 200' for multi- unit structures may be incrementally noticeable within the City Center Core zone, but is generally compatible with building height and bulk standards within this zoning designation. Alternative 2 Distributed Develoi Alternative 3 No Action Proposed increase to 145' for multi -unit Current height limit for multi -unit structures would structures would be comparable to the current remain unchanged. No significant impacts are height limit for office structures and would be anticipated. compatible with existing standards for other uses within this zoning designation. Land use compatibility impacts could result under any of the alternatives and during any of the time periods. As vacant land is developed and other properties are redeveloped, uses that are currently separated and buffered from each other will be required to co -exist in closer proximity. The potential for conflict between uses with differing activity levels will increase as development results in a greater diversity and mix of uses in the project area. Neighborhoods around the edges of the project area with lower intensity uses, such as single and multi -family residential areas could New residential and employment New residential and employment population There would be significantly less residential and population would be most would be more distributed throughout the employment population compared to Alternatives 1 concentrated in Blocks 2 and 3. pTject area than in Alternative 1. and 2. Under all alternatives, future residential Vations will increase rates and amounts. Existing development standards along the edges of the Planned Action area appear to be adequate to allow for a compatible transition from more intensive to less intensive uses. However, as development occurs, this transition area should be evaluated to confirm that long-term land use compatibility impacts are not being created. If necessary, new development standards for edge areas should be considered. Techniques could include site and building lighting limits, requirements for landscaping, noise control and other City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-7 Proposed Action Alternative 1 South 3201h Street Focus Alternative 2 Distributed Development Alternative 3 No Action '►esthetics, Light Glare I Character Proposed increase to 200' for multi- Proposed increase to 145' for multi -unit Current height limit for multi -unit structures would unit structures may be incrementally structures would be comparable to the current remain unchanged. noticeable, but would be compatible height limit for office structures and is not with existing development standards expected to result in significant impacts to in the City Center Core zoning visual character in the City Center Core zoning designation. The proposed change is designation. not expected to result in significant impacts to visual character. ,ts Common to All Alternatives I Character Under all Alternatives, the visual character of the project area will change over time from that of a typical low -scale suburban commercial center to a more intensive mid -rise and high-rise mixed -use center. The magnitude of this change would be greater under Alternatives 1 and 2 than under Alternative 3. and Glare Light generated from traffic, street lights, parking lots and buildings would increase as a result of redevelopment under any of the alternatives. There is also the potential for increased glare depending on the type of building materials used in the new development. The magnitude of this impact is likely to be higher under Alternatives 1 and 2 Views Development of new high and mid -rise buildings could result in decreased views for the remaining low-rise buildings located near these sites and from public rights -of ways. No impact to public facilities, such as schools or parks is anticipated. Shading Conditions There is a potential for increased shadow impacts from development of taller buildings. In the short term, this will be most noticeable at existing low-rise development adjacent to new taller buildings. In the long term, as the area redevelops with taller buildings located in closer proximity to one another, the potential for greater shading through the project area could increase. Alternatives 1 and 2 will have taller buildings in a more compact development pattern, resulting in the potential for greater shading impacts compared to development in Alternative 3. Mitigation Measures Continued use of the City's Community Design Guidelines and review/approval process to monitor and mitigate potential impacts associated with light and glare, shadows, and aesthetic impacts resulting from new development. Increased building height for multi -unit structures in the City Center Core zone would be permitted only with review through the City's design review and public benefits review processes as set forth in the Community Design Guidelines. Monitor shade conditions as development occurs and amend the City's Community Design Guidelines to require site -specific shadow analysis in public places as needed. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-8 Alternative 1 Proposed Action South 3201h Street Focus .4 Trans ormllon )09 Traffic Operations PM Peak Hour — Five intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, focused along S 272nd Street and Pacific Highway South. 4 Parking Requirements AM Peak Hour — Two intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, located at the 1-5 northbound ramp and Military Road S/S 272nd Street. Saturday Peak Hour— Four intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, located around the proiect area. Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Distributed Development No Action i PM Peak Hour— Five intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, focused along S 272nd Street and Pacific Highway South. AM Peak Hour — Two intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, located at the 1-5 northbound ramp and Military Road S/S 272nd Street. Saturday Peak Hour — Four intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, located around the project area. PM Peak Hour — Five intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, focused along S 272nd Street and Pacific Highway South. AM Peak Hour — Two intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, located at the 1-5 northbound ramp and Military Road S/S 272nd Street. Saturday Peak Hour — Two intersections exceed the City's deficiency threshold, located at S 320th Street/20th Ave S and S 320th Street/23,d Ave S. In 2014, a total of approximately In 2014, a total of approximately 4-,0004,334 In 2014, a total of approximately 1,540 parking 4,4004.334 spaces would be required additional spaces would be required compared spaces would be required for new development. compared to the No Action to the No Action Alternative. The cumulative The cumulative parking requirement for the City Alternative. The cumulative parking parking requirement for the City Center project Center project area would be approximately 7,485 requirement for the City Center area would be approximately 44;40011,823 stalls. project area would be approximately stalls. 4-14NI 1.823 stalls. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-9 Alternative 1 3osed Action South 320th Street Focus 2014 Traffic Volumes Impacts Common to All Alternatives Traffic Safety Transit Service Pedestrian Accessibility Bicycle Mobility Mitigation Measures PM Peak Hour City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS During the PM peak hour, an additional nearly 2,400 trips would be added between 2010 and 2014, concentrated on S 3201h Street and Pacific Highway South. Total PM peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 1 would be approximately 5,100 trips. During the AM peak hour, nearly 1,100 trips would be added between 2010 and 2014, focused on South 3201h Street. Total AM peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 1 would be approximately 2,200 trips. During the Saturday peak hour, slightly over 2,500 trips would be added in the project area and vicinity between 2010 and 2014. Total Saturday peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 1 would be approximately 12.100 trips. Alternative 2 Distributed Develo During the PM peak hour, an additional nearly 2,400 trips would be added between 2010 and 2014, concentrated on S 3201h Street and Pacific Highway South. Total PM peak hour traffic growth under Alternative 2 would be approximately 5,100 trips. During the AM peak hour, nearly 1,100 trips would be added between 2010 and 2014, focused on South 3201h Street. Total AM peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 2 would be approximately 2,200 trips. During the Saturday peak hour, slightly over 2,500 trips would be added between 2010 and 2014 in the project area and vicinity. Total Saturday peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 2 would be approximately 12,100 trips. Probabilitv of traffic collisions would increase with increased traffic. demand at the Federal Increased Same as Alternative 3: would be 2nd northbound left turn lane at S 312th St/Pacific Highway South Optimize signal timing at S 336th St/Pacific Highwav South Alternative 3 No Action Approximately an additional 420 new PM peak hour trips would be added to area roadways between 2010 and 2014. Total PM peak hour traffic growth under Alternative 3 would be approximately 860 trips. During the AM peak hour, an additional 214 trips would be added. Total AM peak traffic growth resulting from Alternative 3 would be approximately 450 trips. During the Saturday peak hour, approximately 440 trips would be added between 2010 and 2104. Total Saturday peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 3 would be approximately 1,050 trips. Transit Center may increase with increased development in the project area with increased development in the project area. ;hensive Plan would connect destinations in the project area Same as Alternative 3: 2nd northbound left turn lane at S 3121h St/Pacific 2nd northbound left turn lane at S 3121h Highway South St/Pacific Highway South Optimize signal timing at S 336th St/Pacific Highway Optimize signal timing at S 336th St/Pacific Highway South 1-10 Proposed Action Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 South 320th Street Focus Distributed Development No Action MOO Mitigation required as shown under Alternative 3: Southbound and northbound right turn lanes at S 320th St/20th Ave S Second northbound right turn lane at S 320th St/23rd Ave S In addition, the following additional measures afe f..;—A ould address impacts of for Alternatives 1 or 2: Eastbound right turn lane at S 316th St/Pac Hwy S Northbound right turn lane at S 320th St/Pacific Highway South Westbound right turn lane at S 320th St/23rd Ave S No mitigation is required. Mitigation mquir�c as shown under Alternative 3: Southbound and northbound right turn lanes at S 320th St/201h Ave S Second northbound right turn lane at S 320th St/23rd Ave S In addition, the following additional measures aFe ed W ould address impacts of Alternatives 1 or 2: Eastbound right turn lane at S 3161h St/Pac Hwy S Northbound right turn lane at S 320th St/Pacific Highway South Westbound right turn lane at S 320th St/23rd Ave S No mitigation is required Southbound and northbound right turn lanes at S 320th St/20th Ave S Second northbound right turn lane at S 320th St/23rd Ave S Additional mitigation Additional mitigation to reduce area traffic impacts, improve on -site circulation or meet city and state commuter trip reduction and transportation demand management requirements may include the following: On -site improvements Non -motorized mode improvements • Grid roadway development • Right-of-way dedication • Transportation demand management measures City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS in Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Proposed Action South 320th Street Focus Distributed Development No Action 3.5 Public Services Police LOS Expected growth will result in an Same as Alternative 1. Expected future growth will result in an increased increased need of approximately 8 need of approximately 2 officers by 2014 to officers by 2014 to maintain the maintain current LOS. current LOS. Additional residents will result in an Same as Alternative 1. Park and Recreation LOS Additional residents will result in an increased increased demand for 19.3 acres of demand for 7 acres of new park land in the City to new park land m the Cityto maintain maintain current LOS. current LOS. Impacts Common to All Alternatives Police & Fire Construction activity in the City Center may affect the response times of emergency vehicles. Fire Future development will result in an incremental increase in calls for emergency service and future traffic growth may impact response time. Federal Way Fire Department reports that it has adequate existing and planned capacity to meet the increased demand under any of the alternatives. Mitigation Measures Coordinate with Federal Way Police and Fire Departments during final design, construction, and operation of future development under proposed action to ensure that reliable emergency access is maintained. Coordinate with the Federal Way Parks and Recreation Department to identify opportunities for increased recreational open space for general public use throughout the project area, and within new development proposals. Reduce public safety impacts thru adherence to crime prevention through environmental design [CPTEDI design standards. Provide emergency service providers with advanced notice of construction schedules and any planned street closures or blockages. Avoid or minimize street closures or blockages during construction to avoid impact to emergency response times. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-12 Alternative 1 Action South 320t" Street Focus Utilities cts Common to all Alternatives and Sanitary Sewer Service Alternative 2 Distributed Develo pment Alternative 3 No Action Lakehaven Utility District states that it has available capacity to provide domestic water and sanitary sewer service to the City Center under any of the Alternatives. Alternative 1 and 2 will have the same water demand and sewer discharge rate. Alternative is expected to have slightly less demand. Energy Construction activities could result in disruption of electric service, with the need to relocate service lines, and other construction related impacts. Over the long term, development under any of the Alternatives will increase demand for energy, both electric and gas. Puget Sound Energy PSEJ indicates it has planned for growth and reports adequate capacity to serve the increased demand resulting under any of the Alternatives. Telecommunication Increased residential and employment population will increase the use of and demand for telecommunications products. Service providers had indicated the have adequate capacity for the demand. .Mitigation Measures Ensure that all new development complies with local, state and federal standards for energy conservation. Encourage drought -tolerant landscaping (xeriscaping) for new development. Encourage new commercial, civic and residential development to incorporate appropriate water conservation measures, such as recycling, into their operations. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-13 1.5 Issues to Be Resolved Adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance and concurrent Zoning Code amendments to increase the multi -unit residential structure height standard in the City Center Core zone would support development and re -development of the area to a more intensive mixed -use character consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan. The key environmental issue facing decision -makers is the impact of additional traffic on area roadways and mitigating measures to address such impacts. 1.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Air Quality Temporary, localized dust and odor impacts could occur during the construction activities. Land Use No significant unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated. Aesthetics, Light and Glare No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to aesthetics, light and glare are anticipated. The design standards, guidelines, and mitigating measures described above, together with the City's development regulations are adequate to mitigate the significant adverse impacts anticipated with redevelopment. Transportation Although numerous measures will mitigate transportation -related impacts, increases in traffic congestion at some nodes and/or along some corridors will result in remaining significant, unavoidable, adverse impacts on the area's transportation system. Development of the Federal Way City Center would generate additional traffic volumes on the area's roadways. However, the increased intersection capacity and associated traffic improvements would mitigate undesired impacts. The proposed mixed -use land use pattern, on -site improvements and public and private transportation demand management JDMJ actions, along with high levels of existing and future transit service may further reduce vehicle trips thereby further mitigating impacts. Public Services No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. Utilities No significant unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 1-14 Chapter 2 Description of the Proposal and Alternatives 2.1 Introduction This section of the Final EIS repeats the description of the proposal and alternatives. together with any changes since issuance of the Draft EIS. Text that has been inserted or deleted since the Draft EIS is shown in cross -out or underline format. Overview of the Proposed Action The action proposed by the City of Federal Way consists of the following related actions: 1. Adoption of an ordinance designating a portion of the City Center sub -area (see Figure 1) " as a planned action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031(2)(a) and WAC 197-11-164. The planned action designation would apply to construction of proposed residential, retail, office, hotel, civic and structured parking development falling within the development envelope and project area analyzed in this EIS. The total development envelope analyzed in this I EIS is summarized in Table 2-1. The project area is shown in Figure 1. 1 Table 2-1. Planned Action Development Envelope Uses Develo ment Envelope Retail 750,000 sf Office 350.000 sf 600 rooms 750 units Lodging Residential Civic 100,000 sf Structured Parking 750 stalls Source: City of Federal Way, 2003 The planned action designation his anticipated to apply to development that occurs ' through 2014. The City will periodically assess the rate of actual development that results from the planned action desi ation and associated environmental conditions. Based on this assessment. the City may determine to extend. maintain. or subtract from the effective ]ifespan of the planned action designation, City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS M r North Lake ' T i T I This action may also include procedural text amendments to the Federal Way Municipal Code (FWMC) Chapter 22 (Zoning Code) to recognize the Planned Action designation and process. These changes are not expected to have an environmental impact and are not discussed further in this EIS. 1 1 1 1 I I A Although the planned action designation would not apply to individual development proposals outside of the development envelope or project area, the environmental analysis conducted in this EIS could be used to help achieve SEPA compliance for such proposals. WAC 197-11-600 provides the criteria and procedure for use of existing environmental documents for SEPA compliance. 2. Adoption of a new structure height standard for multi -unit housing in the City Center Core (CC-C) zoning designation in the City Center sub -area, including area outside of the planned action project area (see Figure 2). The new height standard would be 200 feet under Alternative I and 145 feet under Alternative 2. These alternative height scenarios have been included with the alternatives for the numose of analvsis in this EIS. Thev are not dependent on either alternative and the C.i may adopt either height standard regardless of any_decisions related to„the planned action designation. Background The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan lays out a long-range vision for the future of Federal Way. The Plan includes nine elements: Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Capital Facilities, and Private Utilities; Economic Development; Natural Environment; Potential Annexation Areas; and City Center. Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan addresses the City Center sub -area. City Center contains approximately 414 acres and is bound by South 312th Street, South 324th Street, Interstate 5, 11`h Place South and 13th Avenue South (see Figure 1). As described in the Comprehensive Plan, City Center is characterized by: • Typical suburban strip retail and mall development; ■ Large areas of surface parking around the retail development; • Disjointed and over -sized block grid network; • Lack of consistent pedestrian improvements; and ■ Little residential population. J City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-3 11�kCITY OF Federal Way Federal Way Planned Action EIS Prepared by: �� n Jones & Stokes Figure 2: City Center Zoning Designations 1 The future vision for City Center states, "By the end of the comprehensive planning horizon, the Federal Way City Center will have evolved into the cultural, social, and economic center of the City and fulfilled its role as one of Puget Sound's regional network of urban centers. This role will be reinforced by pedestrian -oriented streetscapes; an efficient multi -modal transportation system; livable and affordable housing; increased retail, service, and office development in a compact area; a network of public spaces and parks, superior urban design; and a safe, essential and vibrant street life." Figure 3 illustrates potential development consistent with this vision that could occur in a portion of City Center. In support of this vision, the principal purposes of the City Center chapter are to: " 1 • Create an identifiable downtown that is the social and economic focus of the City; ■ Strengthen the City as a whole by providing for long-term growth in employment and housing; ■ Promote housing opportunities close to employment; ■ Support development of an extensive regional transit system; ■ Reduce dependency on automobiles; ■ Consume less land with urban development; ■ Maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services; ■ Reduce costs of and time required for permitting; E Provide a central gathering place for the community; and ' ■ Improve the quality of urban design for all developments. The City Center chapter contains a number of policies intended to help achieve these goals. City Center Policy CCP5 specifically addresses the intent to prepare a Planned Action EIS for the City Center area. The policy states that the City should "[c]omplete an area -wide environmental impact statement and SEPA Planned Action and provide streamlined permit Ig review in the City Center to accelerate changes to the core area." This proposal is intended to support the principal purposes of the City Center Chapter and to specifically implement Policy CCP5. Objectives of the Proposal The Proposed Action is intended to achieve the following objectives: a Support the principal objectives of the City Center Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, particularly those that promote a more intensive urban style of development in the City Center and the reduction in costs and time required for permitting. ■ Fulfill the direction of City Center Element Policy CCP5. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2.5 Developinent Program = ! Office L...j Residential _ Retail ' Retail ................... 94,064 s .ft •••••••• q ,., -- note: hatching denotes mixed -use Office..........................95,160 sq.ft Residential .......................342 units y Live -_ /Work Townhomes.........J units --- - 1•:.., �. Parking Required .......... 1239 spaces Parking Provided ........... 1338 spaces Four -Story Office Bldg. l ■ ' LSound Transit Center--- _— # oocs • Via.. � - - • •' i - Four-story residential above ground floor � � -. - : f level retail and ground structured parking behind retail.. 3 ; : i i • Four-story loft flex residential above retail with parking behind. Garage laminated with R, .:II. L • xr residantiol and flex office uses. y _ .. ,, t { 05 r 7" _ 9il+Hllili� l Four-story residential with ground floor � retail along main street wrapping shared - �r.f.�� fir -- parking garage. �90 RO - -� - - "._;,��#li St. Ground flaar retail with one to two levels of _ _ _ _ _ .. _ t `._ loft office. Plaza space include outdoor dining areas, fountains, and other interactive elements. '.'• f rMll Redevelopment Concept December 12th, 2005 Scale: 1"=200' lil�I11� Federal Way, WA N Federal Way Planned Figure 3: crTir of Action EIS Redevelopment Fe cl e ra I VVay Prepared by: Concepts Tones & Stokes Y 1 Provide an incentive to development proposals that are consistent with the overall intent 7 of the City Center vision. ■ Provide greater certainty to potential developers, city decision -makers and the general public regarding the future development pattern and likely impacts of future development in the City Center area. 2.2 Planning Process Growth Management Act ] The Growth Management Act (GMA), adopted by the 1990 Washington State Legislature and amended periodically thereafter, contains a comprehensive framework for managing growth and development within local jurisdictions. Many of the provisions of the GMA apply to the state's largest and fastest growing jurisdictions, including King County and all cities within the county. Additionally, some provisions, such as requirements to identify and 1 regulate critical areas, apply to all local jurisdictions. 4 Comprehensive plans for cities planning under GMA must include a land use element (including a future land use map), housing element, transportation element, public facilities element, and utilities element. Additional elements may be added at the local jurisdiction's option. The GMA plan must provide for adequate capacity to accommodate the city's share of projected regional growth. The plan must also ensure that planned and financed ? infrastructure can support planned growth at a locally acceptable level of service. A As required by the GMA, the City of Federal Way has prepared and adopted a local j comprehensive plan to guide future development and fulfill the City's responsibilities under GMA. City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan The City's Comprehensive Plan was prepared in accordance with the GMA and underwent an extensive public participation process that included City residents, property owners, and business owners as documented in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Introduction. The # Comprehensive Plan in its entirety contains nine elements: Land Use, Transportation, Economic Development, Housing, Capital Facilities, City Center, Potential Annexation Area, Natural Environment, and Private Utilities. The GMA requires the plan to be updated no more than once a year except under special circumstances. The GMA also requires a review and update of the plan every ten years. In compliance with these requirements, the City of Federal Way has annually updated the Comprehensive Plan. Development Regulations Zoning Requirements Zoning designations in City Center are the City Center Core (CC-C) and City Center Frame (CC-F). The CC-C designation is intended to provide for a concentration of growth into a City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-7 high -density, mixed -use center for Federal Way. The CC-F designation provides for medium -density mixed -use development in the area surrounding the CC-C designation and extending to the boundary of the City Center sub -area. The CC-F zone allows for similar uses to the CC-C zone, but at a lower density and intensity. The development standards in the CC-F designation are intended to allow a compatible transition to the surrounding area. Article X1, Chapter 22 of the Federal Way City Code establishes the district regulations for the zoning designations in the City. Division 8 establishes the uses and development standards for development in the CC-C and CC-F zones. Permitted uses in the CC-C and CC- F zones include office, retail, entertainment, hotel, convention and trade centers, multi -unit housing, and a variety of public uses. Division 8 also establishes required review processes, lot size, required yards, structure height and required parking. Requirements related to building height are described below. Height of Structure — In the CC-C zone, permitted building heights vary depending on the use. Office and hotel uses are permitted a base height of 95 feet, retail and multi -unit residential uses to a base height of 70 feet. In all cases, heights are allowed to increase subject to special regulations. Office and hotel uses may increase to 145 feet; retail uses to 95 feet; and multi -unit residential uses to 85 feet. In the CC-F zone, the base height limit for office and retail structures is 35 feet, with potential increased building height allowed on a case -by -case basis. Base height limit for multi -unit residential uses is 70 feet to a maximum of 85 feet subject to special regulations for this use. aFor hotel uses, the base height is 45 feet. An increased structure height may be allowed for all uses on a case -by -case basis. Community Design Guidelines Article XIX, Chapter 22, of the Federal Way City Code establishes Community Design Guidelines applicable to all zones in the City and to all development applications except single family residential. New development proposals in the planned action project area would be subject to the Community Design Guidelines and review process. As described in Section 22-1630, the purpose of the Community Design Guidelines are to establish minimum design standards to protect property values and enhance the general appearance of the city; increase flexibility and encourage creativity in building and site design; achieve predictability in design review; improve and expand pedestrian amenities; and implement Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles. Proposals subject to community design guidelines are processed as a component of the underlying land use process. The director of community development services has the authority to approve, modify, or deny proposals under this process. Site design guidelines (Section 22-1634) address general site criteria, parking (surface lots and structured parking), pedestrian circulation and public spaces, landscaping, commercial service and institutional facilities and other site elements. Guidelines for building design (Section 22-1635) address general building criteria, landscape screening, and building articulation and scale. Additional guidelines are provided for building and pedestrian orientation and mixed -use residential buildings. Section 22-1638(c) provides specific guidelines for the City Center Core and Frame zones. Guidelines in this section address City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-8 i parking (surface and structured parking), entrance and building facades, and the location of drive -through facilities. T� 2.3 Planned Action Process Planned Action Overview According to WAC 197-11-164, a Planned Action is defined as a project that: is designated a planned action by ordinance; has had the significant environmental impacts addressed in an EIS; has been prepared in conjunction with a comprehensive plan or subarea plan; is located within an urban growth area; is not an essential public facility; and is consistent with an J adopted comprehensive plan. The City proposes to designate the City Center project area (Figure 1) as a planned action, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and implementing rules. As shown in Figure 1, the project area is bounded on the south by South 3241h Street; on the north by South 312`h Street; on the west by Pacific Highway South; and on the east by 23rd Avenue South. Federal Way will follow applicable procedures, described generally below, to review proposed projects within the project area through the land use review process associated with _ each project to determine their impacts and impose any appropriate development conditions. Planned Action EIS The significant environmental impacts of projects designated as Planned Actions must be identified and adequately analyzed in an EIS (WAC 197-11-164). Planned Action projects should only be designated when a city can reasonably analyze the site -specific impacts that would occur as a result of the types of projects designated. Planned Action Ordinance According to WAC 197-11-168, the ordinance designating the Planned Action shall include 1 the following: 1. A description of the type of project action being designated as a Planned Action; 2. A finding that the probable significant environmental impacts of the Planned Action have been identified and adequately addressed in an EIS; 3. Identification of mitigation measures that must be applied to a project for it to qualify as a Planned Action. T Following the completion of the EIS process, the City of Federal Way would designate the Planned Action by ordinance. The ordinance would identify mitigation, as described in this EIS, which would be applicable to future site -specific development actions. Mitigation could include requirements that would apply to all development in the planned action area as well as measures that may apply on a case -by -case basis. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-9 2.4 Environmental Review Comprehensive Plan EIS The City of Federal Way completed an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the City's GMA Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations in 1995. The Comprehensive Plan EIS considered impacts associated with the proposed land use pattern, including land use in the proposed City Center sub -area (Comprehensive Plan Chapter 7). Elements of the environment that were considered in the Comprehensive Plan EIS include earth; air quality; water resources; plants and animals; energy; environmental health; land & shoreline use; aesthetics, light and glare; transportation; public services and utilities. This Planned Action EIS incorporates by reference the analysis contained in the 1995 Comprehensive Plan EIS as it relates to the City Center sub -area. Scope of Review Pursuant to SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-408 through 410), a Determination of Significance was issued by the City of Federal Way on September 3, 2003. Interested citizens, agencies, organizations, and affected tribes were invited to submit comments on the scope of the EIS. The scoping process included one public meeting, held on September 17, 2003. This meeting provided information about the EIS process, the proposal and alternatives, a SEPA Environmental Checklist on the proposal (DEIS Appendix 3) and an opportunity to comment on the proposed scope of the environmental review. No comments were received on the scope of the EIS. The Draft EIS addressed the following elements of the environment: ■ Land Use — The land use analysis includes an evaluation of the amount, types, scale and pattern of uses. The focus of the analysis is on land use compatibility with existing and planned development within and adjacent to the project area. ■ Transportation — The transportation analysis identifies and evaluates potential impacts to morning/evening peak hour traffic and Saturday traffic in and around the project area. The period through 2009 is analyzed in detail, with a more generalized analysis for the period between 2010 and 2014. ■ Aesthetics — The aesthetics discussion includes a narrative evaluation of the design and character of existing buildings and the nature of change to the urban character that may result from the proposal and alternatives. • Public Services — The public services analysis reviews police, fire and emergency medical services, parks and recreation, and energy and communication. Existing levels of service, estimated needs and demand for services, and measures needed, if any, to respond to projected demand from the proposal and alternatives are described. ■ Utilities — The utilities analysis focuses on water and sewer service. Existing capacity, constraints, planned improvements are described and compared to future demand for water and sewer service resulting from the proposal and alternatives. Air Quality — Air quality analysis focuses on potential air quality impacts resulting from increased traffic associated with the proposal and alternatives. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-10 2.5 Proposed Action and Alternatives Overview This EIS evaluates three alternative land use scenarios for the City Center project area. These different scenarios are intended to allow the Citv to test the impacts of two different growth atterns and to bracket the range of growth that is likely to occur within the Droject area. If adopted, the 121anned action designation would based on the total development enveln e described in Table 2-1. Adoption of a specific action alternative is not necessary for J' implementation of the proposal. a J For the purpose of analysis and discussion in this EIS, the planned action project area has been divided into three smaller analysis areas, referred to in the EIS as Block 1, Block 2 and Block 3. Block 1 consists of the northern portion of the project area and is bounded on the north by S 312`h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by South 316`h Street and on the east by 23r° Avenue S. Block 2 is located in the central portion of the project area and is bounded on the north by S 316`h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by S 320 Street and on the east by 23'd Avenue S. Block 3 is located in the southern portion of the project area and consists mainly of The Commons at Federal Way. Block 3 is bounded on the north by S 3201h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, on the south by S 324'h Street and on the east by 23rd Avenue S. Please refer to Figure 4. Alternatives 1 and 2 assume the maximum development identified in Table 2-1, but distribute growth differently. Alternative 1 assumes that growth is focused around South 320"' Street, with over 85 percent of new growth occurring in Blocks 2 and 3. Alternative 2 distributes future growth more evenly around the project area. As noted above, these alternatives are intended to allow comparison of differe»t, growth scenarios and to bracket the amount of likely future growth within the project area. Future ado tion of a planned action desi nation however, would be based on the total development envelope described in Tahlc 2-1, rather than the specific growth patterns described for alternatives 1 and 2. Alternative 3 (No Action) assumes the level and distribution of growth established in the Comprehensive Plan. Figure 5 shows the relative distribution and amount of total growth assumed under each of the three alternatives. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-11 -5312th3t---_---_ 1 1. 1 almart Brightwator Steele Lakel Apartments Plaza Apts 1 I :, r 4 Hr r r Fitness 1 - f 1 l School District l Main Offico r - - r r , d 1 1 = � 1 - 1 To p f Foods r �' rr _ - S 31str� Federal �•. Best Western Way 1 Motel Transit PC Center ♦ Comfort vi Inn B of Linens.�t„ 1 Thingsi �•J�••� N 1 E Center y ° m SeaTac Plaza - SeaTac �m IL - Villag0 Plaza P Sterlin8`" ry� 1 Genx Savings r , 1 1 S320thSt — — — — — — — _ _ _ _ —I _ The Commons at I Sears- Federal Way 1 3 i 1 i• 1 • 1 in Source: Parcels: King County GIS j Block Boundaries ` 1 —I with Block Number CITY OF Federal Way Federal Way Planned Action EIS Prepared by: Jones & Stokes ] .. BAAFd elmar. MdbileI.Noine.Pa N 300 0 A 300 600 Feet Scale 1" = 600 Feet Figure 4: City Center Analysis Blocks Alternative 1: South 3201h Street Focus Total Development Block 1 12% Block 3 47% Block 2 41% Alternative 2: Distributed Development Total Development Block 1 Block 3 _ 35% 30% ` Block 2 Alternative 3: No Action Alternative Total Development Block 3 Block 1 32 Block 2 36 % A�k CITY OF Federal Way ail 112,500 337,500 300.000 750,000 ;e 62,500 187,500 100.000 350,000 M 100 rooms 300 rooms 200 rooms 600 rooms idential 125 units 375 units 250 units 750 units Uses 0 50,000 sf 50,000 sf 100,000 sf ctured 0 250 spaces 500 spaces 750 spaces ail 255,000 sf 255,000 sf 240,000 sf 750,000 sf ce 135.000 sf 135,000 sf 80,000 sf 350,000 sf el 220 rooms 220 rooms 160 rooms 600 rooms ;idential 275 units 275 units 200 units 750 units c Uses 50,000 sf 50,000 sf 0 100,000 sf Ictured 175 spaces 175 spaces 400 spaces 750 spaces king Land Use Block 1 1 Block 2 � Block 3 Tota I Retail 68,790 sf 83,400 sf 68,080 sf 220,270 sq Office 48,476 sf 39,970 sf 16,000 sf 104,446 sf Residential 70 units 100 units 100 units 270 units Federal Way Planned Action EIS Prepared by: ¢ Jones & Stokes Figure 5: Overview of Alternatives The alternatives also include different assumptions regarding maximum structure height in the City Center -Core and City Center -Frame zones. As noted previously, these alternative height scenarios are associated with different alternatives for the purpose of analysis in this EIS. They are not dependent on either alternative and the City may adopted either height standard regardless of any decisions related to the planned action designation. Under Alternative 3 (No Action) the existing structure height standards would continue unchanged. Alternative 1 Land Use Pattern. The proposed land use pattern would create a dense, mixed -use urban neighborhood focused around South 320`h Street, with development focused in Blocks 2 and 3. The total amount of new development anticipated for the City Center area is as described in Table 2-1 and Figure 5. The new development would be distributed over time and throughout the project area as shown in Tables 2-2 and 2-3. Table 2-2. Alternative 1 (South 320th Street Focus) Development through 2009 Blocks 1 2 3 Total Retail (so 67,500 202,500 180.000 450.000 Office (so 37,500 112,500 60,000 210,000 Lodging rooms 60 180 I + 120 360 Residential (units) 75 225 150 450 Civic (so 0 0 0 0 Structured Parkin stalls 0 150 300 450 Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003 Table 2-3. Alternative 1 (South 3201h Street Focus) 2010 - 2014 Blocks 1 2 3 Total Retail (so 45,000 135.000 120,000 300,000 Offices 25,000 75,000 40,000 140,000 Lodging rooms 40 120 80 240 Residential (units) 50 150 100 300 Civic (sfl 0 50,000 50,000 100,000 Structured Parkin stalls 0 100 200 300 Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003 City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-14 1 Under this Alternative, approximately 47 percent of new growth would be located at The Commons at Federal Way site (Block 3). Approximately 41 percent would occur in Block 2 and the remainder (12%) in Block 1. Development Regulations. Alternative 1 would amend FWMC Division 8, Section 22-797 to allow a maximum structure height for multi -unit housing of 200 feet. The current height i standard is 70 feet or 85 feet. Alternative 2 Land Use Pattern. Similar to Alternative 1, the proposed land use pattern would create a dense, mixed -use urban neighborhood in the project area. In contrast to Alternative 1, Alternative 2 would distribute growth relatively more evenly throughout the project area. Relatively more growth is allocated to Block 1 and relatively less to Blocks 2 and 3. The 1 total amount of new development anticipated for the City Center area is as described in Table 2-1 and Figure 5 and would be distributed over time and throughout the project area as shown in Tables 2-4 and 2-5. FTable 2-4. Alternative 2 (Distributed Development) Development through 2009 Blocks 1 2 3 Total Retail (sq 153,000 153,000 144,000 450,000 Office (sD 81,000 81,000 48,000 210,000 Lodging rooms 132 132 96 360 Residential units 165 165 120 450 Civics 0 0 0 0 Structured Parkin (stalls) 175 0 240 1 415 Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003 Table 2-5. Alternative 2 (Distributed Development) 2010 — 2014 Blocks 1 2 3 Total Retail (sD 102,000 102,000 96,000 300,000 Office M 54,000 54,000 32,000 140,000 Lodging (rooms) 88 88 64 240 Residential units 110 110 80 300 Civic (SO 50,000 50,000 0 100,000 Structured Parkin stalls 0 1 175 160 335 Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003 Under this Alternative, approximately 30 percent of new growth would be located at The Commons at Federal Way site (Block 3). Remaining development potential would be spread City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-15 between Blocks 1 and 2, which each area accommodating approximately 35 percent of the new growth anticipated under the planned action. Development Regulations. Alternative 2 would amend FWMC Division 8, Section 22-797 to allow a maximum structure height for multi -unit housing of 145 feet. The current height standard is 70 feet or 85 feet. Alternative 3 Land Use Pattern. As described in the Comprehensive Plan, the land use pattern in the City Center project area would be characterized by an intensively developed urban core that includes mixed use, office, retail and residential development. Greatest intensity of development would occur in the City Center Core area, with development transitioning in the City Center Frame to the surrounding area. Overall, anticipated growth under this alternative would be approximately 32 percent of that anticipated for office and retail development and 36 percent of that anticipated for residential development under the action alternatives. Tables 2-6 and 2-7 below show the projected growth by Block area and time period. Table 2-6. Alternative 3 (No Action) Development through 2009 Blocks 1 2 3 Total Retails 41,270 %040 40,850 132,160 Offices 29,086 23,980 9,600 1 62,666 Residential units 40 60 60 160 Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003 Table 2-7. Alternative 3 (No Action) 2010-2014 Blocks 1 2 3 Total Retail (sfl 27,520 33.360 27.230 88,110 Office sfl 19,390 15,990 6,400 41,780 Residential (units) 30 40 40 110 Source: City of Federal Way, Jones & Stokes, 2003 Under this Alternative, approximately 32 percent of the new growth would be located at The Commons at Federal Way site (Block 3). Approximately 36% would be located in Block 2, with the remainder (32%) in Block 1 Development Regulations. Under the No Action Alternative, existing development standards would continue unchanged. Development standards for structure height would not be amended. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 2-16 2.6 Benefits and Disadvantages of Delaying Proposed Action The Proposed Action includes adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance for future development in the City Center sub -area and adoption of increased structure height standards for multi -family residential development in the City Center — Core and Frame zones. Delaying implementation of the Proposed Action would delay the potential impacts identified in this EIS, including potential land use conflicts, changes to visual character, increased traffic congestion and increased demand for public services and utilities. This delay could be considered environmentally beneficial in the short-term. Conversely, Rdeferring implementation would a4wdelay and reduce the likelihood that the City Center sub -area will develop in a manner consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan. Delay would not allow new development and associated review processes to benefit from the analysis developed through this Planned Action process. 2.7 Major Issues to be Resolved Adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance and concurrent Zoning Code amendments to allow increased structure heights in the City Center Core and Frame zones would support development and re -development of the area to a more intensive mixed -use character consistent with the vision of the Comprehensive Plan. The key environmental issue facing decision -makers is the impact of additional traffic on area roadways and mitigating measures to address such impacts. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 0N Chapter 3 Errata 1 J This Chapter includes Draft EIS clarifications or corrections based on responses to comments -, presented in Chapter 4 of this Final EIS or based on City staff review of the DEIS information. The clarifications or corrections are organized in the same order as the DEIS sections and by page numbers. Text that has been inserted or deleted since the Draft EIS is shown in cross -out underline format. 3.1 Revisions to DEIS Air Quality Analysis DEIS Page 3-2, revision to Table 3-1 Table 3-1 is amended as follows: Table 3-1. National and State of Washington Ambient Air Duality Standards National EPA Pollutant Primary Secondary Washington State Carbon Monoxide CO 8-hour average 1-hour average 9 ppm 35 pprn 9 ppm 35 opm 9 ppm 35 pprn Particulate Matter PM xx PM10 Annual average 24-houraverage 50 pg/m3 150 /m3 50 pg/m3 150 u /m3 50 pg/m3 150 /m3 PM2.5 Annual average 24-hour average 15 pg/m3 65 pg/m3 15 pg/m3 65 /m3 15 pg/m3 65 /m3 Lead Quarterly average 1.5 /m3 1.5 /m3 1.5 /m3 Sulfur Dioxide Annual average 24-hour average 3-hour average 1-hour averaqe 0.03 ppm 0.14 ppm No standard No standard No standard No standard 0.50 ppm No standard 0.02 ppm 0.10 ppm No standard 0.40 ppMa Ozone City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-1 National EPA Pollutant Primary Secondary Washington State 8-hour avera eb 0.08 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.08 oom Nitrogen Dioxide Annual average 0.05 p m 0.05 ppm 0.05 p m Source: Jones & Stokes, 2005 Notes: Annual standards never to be exceeded. Short-term standards not to be exceeded more than once per year unless noted. ppm = parts per million PM10 = particles 10 microns or less in size PM2.5 = particles 2.5 microns or less in size pg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter a 0.25 ppm not to be exceeded more than two times in 7 consecutive days. b Not to be exceeded on more than 1 day per calendar year as determined under the conditions indicated in Chapter 173-475 WAC. Revision to DEIS Page 3-3 Federally funded transportation projects proposed for construction within nonattainment areas or maintenance areas are subject to the Transportation Conformity regulations specified under the Clean Air Washington Act. 1 Revision to DEIS Page 3-6 ■ Conduct a project -level CO "hot spot" analysis to model the worst -case concentrations adjacent to the roadway, and compare the modeled concentrations to the allowable ambient air quality standards. 3.2 Revisions to DEIS Land Use Analysis Revisions to DEIS page 3-12 through 3-14 Vacant and Redevelopable Land Vacant Land Based on a review of the project area and King County Assessor's data, approximately 45-3_5 acres are vacant in Block 1 and 3 acres in Block 2, for a total of approximately,9 6.5 acres of vacant land. See Figure 7 for the location of these parcels. Redevelopable Land Based on King County Assessor's data. potential for lot aggregation and local two► ledge of the project area, the project area liar a- total of approximately 8462 i .24 acres of vacant and redevelopable land have been idgmifled in Block 1; 8-.W8.19 acres in Block 2; and 0.65 acres in Block 3, for a total of 4-7—.730.08 acres of vacant and redevelopable land in the Project area (see Table 3-6). City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-2 ' — — -.S 312th St 1 ;1 B ghtwat Steel Lake 1 1 Walmart ~Apartments pts 1 b 1 24 Hr• 1 1- it ess 1 School DIs l t Main Offi Hillside F 1 Plaza ' Top •1 E 1 Foods 1 — 3 316th St 1 Federal l 4 t Western Way 1 ecutel -7.7 - _ {, j, Transit _ Center Comfort W Inn yf • r- �� Linens & C 1 U Things 2O 1 N Center to SeaTao Plaza SeaTac �e IL village Plaza Sterling I Genx Savings -, I—— — 3320th3t — — — —— I I � 1 v 1 1 1 I � 1 � I ' w The Commons at 1 Sears . Federal Way 01 1 a Macys I 1 j • .I 1 r I______---S324thSt �op 3 Belmar - Mobile Home Park Source: Parcels: King County GIS N Vacant Parcels 1 1 RI Block Boundaries with Block Number 300 0 300 600 Feet Redevelopable Parcels - Scale 1" = 600 Feet CITY OF Federal Way Federal Way Planned Action EIS Prepared by: SSA Jones & Stokes Figure 7: Vacant and Redevelopable Land Table 3-6. Vacant and Redevelopable Land Summary Vacant Land' Redevelo able Land' TOTAL Block 1 &.353.48 acres 2-.917.76 acres 94521.24 acres Block 2 2-422.21 acres &Q55.98 acres 9 978.19 acres Block 3 0 acres 0.65 acres 0.65 acres TOTAL 6:75.69 acres 5:9924.39 acres 4�430.08 acres Source: Jones & Stokes, 2006. 1. Based on King County Assessor's data, 2006. 2. King County Buildable Lands Report methodology; using 2006 King County Assessor's data, adjusted based on City of Federal Way local knowledge of the project area Existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations As shown on Figure -38, the project area is currently designated City Center Core (CC-C) from S. 324th Street to S. 316th Street. From S. 316th to S. 312th the area is designated City Center Frame (CC-F). Revision to DEIS page 3-15 Existing Zoning Code Designations As shown in Figure 3.2, the area is currently zoned City Center Core (CC-C) from S. 324th Street to S. 316th Street. From S. 316th to S. 312th the area is zoned City Center Frame (CC- F). Tables 3-7 and 3-8 identify the major permitted uses and standards provided for in each zone. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-4 Revision to DEIS page 3-17 Table 3-7. City Center Core Permitted Uses and Development Standards Permitted Uses Maximum Building Height Minimum Parking Requirement! Office 95' above average building elevation 1 stall/300 sf to a maximum of 145' subject to special regulations for this use. Retail, including regional retail 70' above average building elevation 1 stall/300 sf shopping center to a maximum of 95' subject to special regulations for this use. 95' above average building elevation Hotel/Convention/Trade 1 stall/guest room; convention/trade Centers to a maximum of 145' subject to center case by case s ecial re ulations for this use. 70' above average building elevation 1 space/200 gsf for private clubs and Entertainment to a maximum of 95' subject to lodges; all other uses 100 space/100 special regulations for this use. gsf case by case Parking garage 45 feet above average building elevation Multi -Unit Housing 70' above average building elevation 1.7 stalls/unit to a maximum of 85' subject to s ecial re ulations for this use. 35 feet above average building case by case Hospital/Nursing Home elevation 75 feet above average building Government Facility case by case elevation Public Utility 35 feet above average building case by case elevation case by case Schools 35 feet above average, with gym up to 55' if beyond 100' from residential zone. Personal Wireless Service Not specified; subject to Zoning Not applicable Facility Code Section 22-967. Source: City of Federal Way, 2006. 1. Parking re uirement may be established through a prodect-s ecific analysis, subject to approval by the Directors of the Community Bevels ment Services and Public Works De artments. `J _j City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-5 Revision to DEIS page 3-18 Table 3-8. City Center Frame Permitted Uses and Development Standards Permitted Uses Maximum Building Height Minimum Parking Requirement! Office 35' above averse building elevation 1 stall/300 sf Retail 35' above average building elevation 1 stalll300 sf Hotel/Convention/Trade 45' above average building elevation 1 stall/guest room convention/trade Centers center case by case Entertainment 60' above average building elevation 1 space/200 gsf for private clubs and lodges, all other uses 100 space/100 sf Vehicle Service Station 35' above average building_elevation case by case Multi -Unit Housing 70' above average building elevation 1.7 stalls/unit to a maximum of 85' subject to special regulations for this use. Group Homes/Transition 35'above average building elevation. case by case Housing Schools, Day Care 35'; gyms to 55' if located more than case by case Facilities, Churches 100 feet from adjacent residential zone. Hospital facilities 35' above average building elevation case -by case Source: City cf Federal Way, 2006 1. Parkins requirement may be established through a project -specific analysis, subject tp approval by the Directors of the Community Development Services and Public Works Departments. As shown in Figure -2, zoning designations in the surrounding area also correspond to comprehensive plan land use designations. Zoning designations include: in Community Business (BC) — BC allows general retail uses and is located along Pacific Highway South, to the north and south of the City Center sub -area. ■ RM 1800 — This multi -family zoning designation allows multi -family development to a maximum density of 24 units per acre. This designation is found north of the project area. RS 7.2 — The single-family designation allows a density of six units per acre and is the primary zoning designation for the single-family area surrounding the City Center sub- area. In addition, Steel Lake Park and Celebration Park are both zoned RS 7.2. ■ RM 2400, RM 3600 — These multi -family designations allow maximum densities of 18 and 12 units per acre, respectively. These designations are found in the area south of The Commons at Federal Way. An area of RM 2400 zoning is also found to the cast of the northern CC-F zoningdi City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-6 d 0 .25 .5 1 MILES ��"fy CITY OF Federal Way Federal Way Planned Action EIS Prepared by: "7 Jones & Stokes Figure 8: Comprehensive Plan Designations Revisions to DEIS page 3-20 The two largest employers in the surrounding area include Weyerhaeuser and the Federal Way School District, with 3,586 and 2,885 employees, respectively (Federal Way Chamber of Commerce). Other large employers in the area with approximately 500-600 employees each include World Vision, the U.S. Post Office, and St Francis Hospital. The City of Federal Way is also a major employer in the vicinity of the project area, with 306 employees. Alternative 1 Asp..,..,,,., ", Table 3 ' ' , •Development through 2009 under Alternative 1 would introduce a total of 450,000 sf of new retail space, 210,000 sf of office space, 360 hotel rooms, 450 residential units, and 450 structured parking stalls. Revisions to DEIS page 3-22 Alternative 2 The proposed increase to 145 feet' for multi -unit structures would be equal to the current height limit for office and hotel structures in the CC-C zone and comparable to the height standard for other uses in this zone. Impacts Common to All Alternatives The potential for such conflict will increase with greater- diversity and mix of uses in the project area. 3.3 Revisions to DEIS Aesthetics, Light and Glare Analysis Revision to DEIS page 3-27 The Commons at Federal Way is the commercial anchor in the project area. The Mall is principally oriented toward S 320'h Street, with surface parking area located between the primary building and the street (see Figure 12). Development consists of the primary mall facility and :re'�outbuildings,lee�1�he nef4 ast comer- of the .,..long a The property is bounded along the west side by a utility easement that generally parallels South 324t" Street and contains high voltage transmission lines and utility towers. Revision to DEIS page 3-32 Example Development Area 2: Northwest quadrant of the intersection of 20tn Avenue S/S 316th Street This development area is currently %,aeaiifbeittg developed by a single -story restaurant. Major retail uses surrounding this development area include Top Foods to the west, Walmart to the north and the former Toys R Us bLlildipl-_ to the east. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-8 Example Development Area 4: West of 2P Avenue South, at approximately S 319«' Place Development in this area includes the SeaTac Plaza, a single -story commercial complex e consisting of approximately 107,400 square feet and 234,000 square feet of surface parking. -, The fiatuFe Sound Federal WayTransit Center is plaimelocated on the property north of i the SeaTac Plaza. Example Development Area 6: Southeast corner of The Commons at Federal j Way site This area is located in the southeast corner of The Commons at Federal Way parking lot. Development in this area consists of a paved parking area, bounded along the southern edge by the power transmission towers and power lines. Development to the east, across 23ra Avenue South consists of a small retail ssst__ ri)-, located above the street, behind a concrete retaining structure. _ Revision to DEIS page 3-39 Views -� Development of high and mid -rise buildings in the project area could result in improved - ! views to Mount Rainier for these uses; but could also result in decreased views for the remaining low-rise buildings located near these sites and from public rights -of -ways. 3.4 Revisions to DEIS Transportation Analysis Revision to DEIS page 3-52 Transit Services Federal Way is served by a number of transit providers including King County Metro, Pierce County Transit, and Sound Transit. In the vicinity of the project area, there is frequent transit service with 23 routes serving the area during weekday hours with service as frequent four times per hour. Midday and Weekend service levels are lower. The Transit Center serves the freeway -oriented bus routes King County Metro Routes �'L a 1947 and 197; and Sound Transit Routes 565, 574 and 577. Other transit routes at the Transit Center include King County Metro Routes 173 (starting in Sptember 2006),_174, 181, 182, 183,187, 545,574_-577, 901, 903 and Pierce Transit Routes 402, 500 and 501. The other major transit facility within the project area vicinity is the Federal Way/S 320th St Park and Ride facility at 23rd Ave S & S 323rd Street. Routes 173, 174, 177, 194 and 196 serve the park and ride facility. Route 173 will relocate to the Transit Center in Segtember 2006. `i City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-9 Revision to DEIS page 3-57 Parking Requirements Table 3-23 describes the increase in parking requirement for the Alternative 1 above existing levels. These increases assume full development by the year 2014. The parking requirements estimate the number of spaces required for the proposed mix of uses assumed for Alternative 1 and is identical for Alternatives 1 and 2. Compared with Alternative 3, 4,4A444,334 additional spaces would be required under the City's parking code. These spaces may be provided on the site or as part of parking structures assumed as part of future development. The actual parking requirement for an individual development may be reduced through shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management programs. This reduction could vary from 10% to 20%. Table 3-23. Alternative 1 and 2 Parking Requirement Land Use Parking Code Requirement Proposed Development' Required Parkin z Increase over Alternative 3 Civic Uses! Case by case!- 1000,000 sf Unknewn333 stalls Unknewn333 stalls Hotel 1 per room 600 rooms 600 stalls 600 stalls Office 1 per 300 sf 350,000 sf 1,167 stalls 819 stalls Other3 1 per 1000 sf 0 sf 0 stalls 0 stalls Residential 1.7 per unit 750 units 1,275 stalls 816 stalls Retail 1 per 300 sf 750,000 sf 2,500 stalls 1,766 stalls Total 5-542'L5875 stalls 4,: 34 stalls Source: Jones and Stokes Associates, 2005. 1. Assumes 2014 full build -out of planned action development envelope; please see Chapter 2. 2. These parking demands may be 10% to 20% less based on shared parking. 33. Category includes such uses as wholesale, storage, light manufacturing and other similar uses. 4. Civic uses cover a wide range of potential uses, including libraries, cultural centers, community centers and others. For the Purpose of this table. a parking ratio of 300 spacesl1000 square feet of bulIding area is assumed. Actual parking requirement will depend an the type of use that is proposed. Revision to DEIS page 3-69 The final mitigation improvements for the planned action would be reviewed and adopted by City Council. As identified in this study, Alternatives 1 and 2 would require no additional mitigation over actions needed for the No Action alternative. The No Action mitigation would be approximately $2.1 million. Planned action development rp ojects may be required to fund aproportional share of'' e Ne eiiaw"r}^•-•�these improvements. Saturday Peak Hour Table 3-29 lists the -potential Saturday peak hour mitigation improvements. As identified in this study, the Saturday peak hour analysis assumes the completion of the PM peak hour improvements indicated in Table 3-28. A substantial amount of the Saturday mitigation is identified for the No Action alternative. Two options are provided for construction of the northbound right turn lane at S. 320`h Street and 20'b Avenue S intersection. The first option relocates a proposed City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-10 i i' sidewalk to the west of a future but permitted building, eliminating the need for a full building take. The second option purchases the building and constructs the sidewalk within r the roadway right-of-way. The difference between the two options is estimated at $2.6 1 million. The range of costs for the identified mitigation under the No Action alternative would be approximately $2.5 million to $5.2 million. Additional Saturday geak hour mitigation has been identified for Alternatives 1 and 2 with an estimated cost of j $3.2 million amounting to a total (including Alternative 3) of approximately $5.7-$8.4 million. The Federal Way City Council will make a determination 1 as to whether to require mitigation for Saturday peak hour congestion as part of their review and action on the proposedPlannedAction designation and ordinance. _J Revision to DEIS page 3-70 through 3-71 Table 3-30. Intersection Operations by Peak Hour with Mitigation (20091 Alternative 3 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 PM Peak Mitigated Mitigated Mitigated Intersection LOS vlc LOS vlc LOS vlc S 272 St & Pacific Hwy S1 F 1.102 F 1.092 F 1.092 S 272 St & 1-5 southbound Ramp' F 1.022* F 1.002 F 1.002 S 272 St & MilitaH Rd S4 F 1.242 F 1.222 F 1.222 S 312 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.95 D 0.95 D 0.95 S 336 St & Pacific Hwy S D 0.92 D 0.93 D 0.93 AM Peak S. 272 St & 1-5 northbound Ram WSDOT E 1.082 E 1.092 E 1.092 S. 272 St & Military Rd S4 F 1.092 F 1.102 F 1.102 Saturday Peak S 316 St & Pacific Hwy S na3 na3 D 0.92 C 0.92 S 320 St & Pacific Hwy S 3 na3 na3E 0.96 E 0.942 S 320 St & 20 Av S D 0.95 D 0.99 D 0.99 S 320 St & 23 Av S E 0.92* E 0.92 E 0.93 Source: Mirai Associates, 2006 1. The City of Kent exempts intersections along Highways of Statewide Significance from their LOS threshold and mitigation is not proposed for these intersections. 2. Results based on HCM2000 Signals software (version 4.2f), refer to DEIS Appendix 2 for additional information. 3. Meets City of Federal Way thresholds without mitigation. 4. King County requires mitigation of intersections that receive 30 trips in an hour or 20% of the proposed new trips and exceeds LOS F. Less than 2% of project trips access the King County intersection of Military roadl272nd Street,, therefore, mitigation is not proposed for these intersections.. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-11 Revision to DEIS page 3-73 Neighborhood Traffic Control — Development within the project area may be required to include actions to reduce the impact Of eUt thf-OUg tFaffiC-potential cut -through traffic impacts on residential areas surrounding City Center. Examples of neighborhood traffic control actions include: turn restrictions, speed controls, traffic enforcement, and parking restrictions. The following iiiiii a;iairrecommended mitigation measures support the following City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (2003 revision) Transportation Element (Chapter 3): 3.5 Revisions to DEIS Public Services Analysis Revisions to DEIS page 3-77 Table 3-31 shows the breakdown of the major types of calls for service for each of these reporting districts. Table 3-31. Calls for Service in City Center Project Area 2001 2b042002 2003 2004 2005 Crime Type City Center Cit City Center City City Center City City Center City City Center Cit Homicide 0 4 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 8 Rae 4 43 1 49 3 50 1 50 2 55 Robbery 19 128 14 124 23 1 125 23 121 23 153 Felony Assault 9 158 7 141 37 120 40 109 36 101 Burqlary 26 521 36 677 37 672 30 759 32 1 793 Auto Theft 128 1179 85 206 78 3145 68 1118 126 1573 Larceny 743 3516 738 3347 743 1204 421 3257 753 3786 Arson 2 931 17 5566 0 29 1 14 1 23 0 24 Total 1 881 4577 _ 923 5332 584 5437 972 6493 Grime % in City Center 16.73% 19.25% 17.31 % 10.74% 14.97% Source: Federal Way Department of Public Safety, 2006 City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-12 i �r 1 Revision to DEIS page 3-77 Tahip 3-32_ Tra#ir_ FnMrr_pmant Arstivity 2nn5 Type of Activity Citywide # of calls RD76 RD74 RD48 City Center Area # of calls % # of calls % # of calls % # of calls % Collisions 2,256 25 1.1 35 1.6 18 0.8 78 3.5% Traffic Stops 13,205 35 0.2 555 4.2 96 0.7 686 5.1 % DUI Arrests 359 1 1 1 0.3 1 5 1 1.4 3 1 0.8 9 2.5% aource: reaerai vvay ueparimem oT ruonc SaTery, zuub. -I Revision to DEIS page 3-78 Fire and EMS Station 62 is located at 31617 1st Avenue S. and Station 64 is located at 3QOI '3700 S 320" Street, Auburn. Major equipment at Station 62 includes a 2002 KME Pumper, 2003 Road Rescue Aid Car, 2003 Suburban Command Vehicle, 1991 Pierce 105 foot'- Aerial Ladder Truck. Service area wide, between 2004-2005, fire calls increased by 2.7-percent, and emergency medical services increased by 4.6 percent. Revision to DEIS page 3-79 1 When the City of Federal Way incorporated in 1990, there were approximately eight acres of park land available per 1,000 population. Since that time, the City has purchased additional property and developed new facilities. As of 2005, the City provided 11.79 acres of parkland per 1,000 population, compared to an adopted level of service of 10.9 acres of park land per 1,000 population. Some school facilities, such as Truman High School, located just east of the project area, are available nights and weekends for use by }die -residents. A community center and pool at Celebration Park is plannedcurrejitly uiider construction. Revision to DEIS page 3-80 Assuming that some of these additional revenues are provided for police protection, the Federal Way Police Department concludes that it will have adequate existing and planned capacity to meet the increased demand under any of the alternatives (Brian J. Wilson, Federal Way Department of Public Safety, 2003). Development of either of the action alternatives will result in an additional 1,770 new residents and 3,677 new employees in the City Center project area. The additional residents will result in an increased demand for 19.3 acres of new parkland, according to the City's City Center Planned Action J Draft Planned Action EIS 3-13 2002 level of service goal of 10.9 acres per 1,000 population. Under Alternative 3, the 638 new residents would result in an increased demand for approximately 7 acres of parkland. Revisions to DEIS page 3-81 In the future, the City may wish to consider identification of an open space standard on level of service standard for employees. ■ Coordinate with the Federal Way Parks. -and -Recreation and Cultural Services Department to identify opportunities for increased recreational open space for general public use throughout the project area, and within new development proposals. 3.6 Corrections Utilities Analysis Revisions to DEIS page 3-81 Water The Lakehaven Utility District provides domestic water for- the entire r•:t,.�� 1t1Ust_af il�e City of Federal Way, including the City Center project area. Other water service providers that serve the City include Tacoma Public Utilities and Highline Water District. The November 1998 Lakehaven Comprehensive Water System Plan Update (CWSU) sets forth projected facility needs and standards. Revision to DEIS page 3-82 Table 3-34. Water and Sewer Service Demand Estimates Type of Use Estimated Usage Units Residential Equivalent) Equivalent Peak Water Demand per day) Equivalent Sewer i Discharge per day) Residential 1 residential equivalent (2.45 persons) 225 gallons per day (gpd) 220 c; Restaurant 3 per 1.000sf 675 god per 1.000sf 660 apd ep r 1.000sf 44 gpdd, er 1,000sf Retail 0.2 per 1,000sf 45 gpd per 1,000sf Office 0.3 per 1,000sf 68 gpd per 1,000sf 66 gpd per 1,000sf Source: Lakehaven Utility District 2003, 2006 Water- pi-esciffeAvailable fire flow is not a limitation in the City Center project area. For example, 10,000 gallons per minute of flow is possible at the intersection of 320th and SR 99. This amount of pressuavailable fire flow is ample for a typical urban commercial center. The pressure boundary is located within the City Center along 320th. The pressure zone boundary allows large water consumption in one area (i.e., north of 320th) not to affect water - press weavailable fire flow to other areas (i.e., south of 320th). A portion of the District's water supply and storage program includes ASR (Aquifer Storage and Recovery). This program includes: direct recharge of reclaimed groundwater, natural recharge of potable aquifers, discharge of reclaimed water to wetlands, eeffiffler-eial reuse, and landscape irrigation of reclaimed water. pie ASR stefai ,,�.,a_� ,t.�r„ .,,,aor� —l" City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-14 ..J M -J and will ► &ve a Cn MGD eapaGA _The District's underground Aquifer Storage and Recovery _program is currently undergoing review and w'sIl have a capacity up to SO MGD. This storage facility is expected to be fully functional by 2024. Two new pump stations will be added at l st Ave and the BPA right-of-way. and 44"' Ave S and the BPA right-of-way (east of Military Road). Both of these stations are expected to be up and running by 2005. Revisions to DEIS pp. 3-82 - 83 Sewer The Lakehaven Utility District also provides sewer service tomost of the City of Federal Way, including the City Center project area. The other sewer service provider in the City is the Midway Sewer District. The trunk system collects wastewater from drainage basins and conveys it to the applicable treatment plant primarily by gravity flow. `fie BRA r-i& of- way (east of Mililai-y Read). Bo4h ef these sta4iens are expected te be up and FuFming by r ' 045 Revision to DEIS page 3-85 Long merge -range plans for the years 2008-2009 call for installation of a 16" STW High Pressure supply main from Auburn Valley to the Star Lake area, and the route is still in the planning stage. Wireless Networks The Federal Way area is currently served with wireless service by Qwest, AT&T Wireless, "i�hVerizon Wireless, GTE, Sprint, Nextel, Metricom, and VoiceStream. All of these technologies use a line -of -sight radio signal transmitted and received by antennas. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 3-15 mil __j Chapter 4 Comments and Responses Chapter 4 of this Final EIS contains written and verbal comments provided on the Draft EIS during the EIS comment period. The comment period for the Draft EIS extended from June 26 to July 25, 2006. Written comments received during this period, as well as comments received at the July 13, 2006 public meeting are included in this Chapter. Responses to comments follow the comments section. Public Comments Public comments received during the comment period include the following: Letters Letter Number Date of Comment Author Public Agencies 1 July 19, 2004 King County Department of Transportation (Gary Kriedt) 2 July 3, 2004 Lakehaven Utility District (Bert Ross and Don Perry) Citizens 3 July 15, 2006 H. David Kaplan July 22, 2004 Public Hearing Comments Comment Number Date I Author 1 - 13 July 13, 2006 1 H. David Kaplan City Center Planned Action J Draft Planned Action EIS 4-1 (i) King County Department of Transportation Metro Transit Division, Design & Construction Section Environmental Planning and Real Estate, MS KSC-TR-0431 201 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104-3856 (206) 684-1418 FAX: (206) 684-1900 July 19, 2006 Patrick Doherty, Director of Economic Development PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Subject: City Center Planned Action Draft EIS Dear Mr. Doherty: King County Metro Transit staff reviewed the Draft EIS for the City Center Planned Action, and we have the following comments. The Alternative 1 action alternative may be preferred, from a transit standpoint, as it does suggest denser development, including additional multifamily residential, in the vicinity of 320th Street and near the new Transit Center located at 23rd Avenue S/S 317th Street. Under this development alternative, trip -making by transit into this area would be a more attractive option. The new Transit Center was sited here in part to help facilitate the development of this area around the future Federal Way City Center. The description of transit routes in the Transit Services section (Section 3.4 Transportation, page 3-52) has a few minor errors: Second paragraph, page 3-52 - The Transit Center is served by freeway -oriented Metro Routes 194 and 197 (not 177) and South Transit Routes 565, 577 (and 574). Other transit routes at the Transit Center include Metro routes 173 (starting in September'06), 174, 181, 182, 183, 187, 901, and 903, and Pierce Transit routes 402, 500, and 501. Third paragraph, page 3-52 - Metro's Federal Way 320th Park & Ride lot is served by 173*, 174, 177, and 194 (not 196). *Note that the 173 will relocate to the Transit Center in September'06. Bus stops should be identified on document diagrams where appropriate. All bus stops in the area that don't have shelter footings, pedestrian lighting and ADA `landing pads' will eventually need to be upgraded to include those elements. We would appreciate your adding those elements to individual project reviews, as appropriate. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Sincerely, Gary Kriedt Senior Environmental Planner MOBILITY FOR THE REGION I "Don Perry" <DPerry@lakehaven.org> 7/3/2006 4:13 PM >>> Patrick here are Lakehaven's comments on the above listed subject. The changes are offered below in Bert Ross's email to me. From: Bert Ross Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 4:01 PM To: Don Perry Cc: Wes Hill Subject: City of Federal Way's City Center Planned Action Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) - Lakehaven Impacts Don, In response to your request, I reviewed relevant portions of the above -referenced document to determine the reasonableness of the impacts on the water and sewer systems that they describe as resulting from the City's proposed long-term land use development of the City Center bounded by South 312th Street, South 324th Street, Pacific Highway South, and 23rd Avenue South. I re -scanned the relevant portions of this 136-page DEIS and am attaching it to this e-mail. I note the following need to be changed to: -� 1) Page 3-81, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", first paragraph, j first line: Lakehaven provides water service to most, but not all, of the City of Federal Way l territory. Other water service providers in the City are Tacoma Public Utilities and Highline Water District. 2) Page 3-81, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", second paragraph, first line: The name of the cited document is "...Lakehaven Comprehensive Water System Plan r� Update..." 3) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", Table 3-34, fourth column: The "gpd/ gallons per day" units of measure should be inserted for the equivalent 1 sewer discharge figures. 4) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", second paragraph, first, third, and fifth lines: The words "pressure" and "water pressure" are not used in the correct context; the -� words "available fire flow" are more aptly intended here. 5) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", second paragraph, third and fourth lines: The term "pressure boundary" should be changed to "pressure zone boundary." .J 6) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", third paragraph, third line: "Commercial reuse" is not part of the District's ASR program. Water reuse and reclamation is a separate program. 7) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Water", third paragraph, fourth line: To make it perfectly clear, the third sentence should read: "The District's underground Aquifer Storage and Recovery program is currently undergoing review and will have a capacity up to 50 MGD." 8) Page 3-82, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Sewer", fifth paragraph, first line: Lakehaven provides sewer service to most, but not all, of the City of Federal Way territory. The other sewer service provider in the City is Midway Sewcr District. 9) Page 3-83, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Sewer", first partial paragraph, first line: The sentence that starts on the previous page should read: "The trunk system collects wastewater from drainage basins and conveys it to the applicable treatment plant primarily by gravity flow." It should not be implied that all of the sewage flow generated within Lakehaven's sewer service area is conveyed to a single treatment plant. 10) Page 3-83, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Affected Environment/Sewer",third full paragraph, fourth and fifth lines: The two pump stations cited are water facilities, rather than sewer facilities. 11) Page 3-86, Section 3.6 "Utilities/ Impacts/ Water and SanitarySewer Service", second paragraph, sixth through ninth line: We acknowledge that the projected flow impact on the water and sewer systems under the "worst case" scenarios identified are 0.38 MGD and 0.38 MGD, respectively (a relatively small impact indeed). 12) Page 4-2, Section 4.2 "Personal Communications", second citation: Stan French is Lakehaven's Water Quality/Production Engineer, not the General Manager. Comments are due back to Patrick Doherty of the City by July 25. Federal Way City Center DEIS-Water & Sewer Portion 6-06.pdf July 15, 2006 TO: Patrick Doherty FROM: H. David Kaplan CC: Derek Matheson RE: City Center Planned Action EIS I have reviewed this 89 page document, subsequent to our meeting on July 13. My approach to reading it was to seek CLARITY, CONSISTENCY and ACCURACY. I did not check tabulations in tables; that's for the specialists to do. I did not include remarks on accepted - journalistic procedure (like numbers under ten being written out), since there was too much nit- picking involved. I also assumed certain acronyms were immediately understood without being written out (SEPA, EIS, RCW et al). But others should be spelled out the first time they are used. - Therefore, listed below are my suggestions for clarity, consistency and accuracy. Page 1-3. This is the first time CO is used for Carbon Monoxide. The gaseous chemical should r� be written out in words. _i Page 1-4. Even though NOx and PM10 are defined on pages 3-1 and 3-2, they should be written out here as Oxides of Nitrogen and Particulate Matter smaller than 10 microns. NAAQS should be written out as National Ambient Air Quality Standards and PSCAA should be written out as Puget Sound Clean Air Authority. Page 1-5. Only structured parking is mentioned in this table. Won't surface parking be allowed? 9 Page 1-7. Visual Character. End of first sentence I assume should be "center", not "cent." Light and Glare. "Streetlights" should be two words. Page 1-11. Park and Recreation LOS. "Parkland" needs to be two words. (This is true throughout the document and will be noted elsewhere where appropriate). Clarify that the additional 19.3 acres of park land needed due to the development in this area is _J to be fulfilled throughout the city, not just in the Planned Area? Page 1-12. Mitigation Measures. "OPTED" should be spelled out. Even I don't know what it is! 3.6 Water and Sewer. Third sentence needs a "3" put in after "Alternative" and before "is". 3.6 Energy. This is the first time PSE is used. Spell it out. Page 1-13. Transportation. This is the first time "TDM" is used. Spell it out. -J Figure 1. The proper name is Lake Dolloff, not Dolloff Lake. 2 Page 2.6 First paragraph under bullets, third line. Why is "c" in brackets: [c]? Page 3.2 Table 3-1. Add CO after Carbon Monoxide, since that is how you refer to the gaseous chemical on page 3.3 and this addition adds clarification. Should "Nitrogen Dioxide" in the table be "Oxides of Nitrogen" for consistency? Page 3.3 Transportation. Delete "Washington" from Clean Air Washington Act for correct title. Page 3.6 Three paragraphs from the bottom." Carbon Monoxide (CO)" is redundant, since the identification has already been spelled out. You could just say "CO". Page 3-13. Review the numbers for Vacant and Redevelopable Land based on our July 13 discussion. Page 3-20. Why isn't the City of Federal Way included in the listing of Large Employers? The designation should be included for p.r. and perspective reasons. If the City doesn't have 500 employees (and I don't think we do), then change the parameters so that we are included. The last paragraph on the page, under Alternative 1, wording refers to Table 3-11 as showing square feet of office space. Table 3-11 is actually Population and Employment Projections. No mention is made of square feet of anything. Page 3-22. Land Use Capability. Alternative 2 refers to 145'; delete quote and insert "feet". Page 3-27. Why does the report say that there is only ONE outbuilding on the Mall property? Isn't WAMU's building considered an "outbuilding"? There is an omission of the four new building pads on the 320th side of the Mall. Perhaps by the time this document is printed, the Mall will let us say who will be building there, or at least the generic type of structure (bank, restaurant etc.). Page 3-32. Example Development Area 2. All of the site is not vacant, since a new restaurant is currently being built at the 316th street end. TOYS R US is no longer across the street. Example Development Area 4. Sound Transit Center is an incorrect name. It is the Federal Way Transit Center. (The sign above the driveway says so!) And, the Center is not "planned", it is "recently built", or "was opened in 2006". Example Development Area 6. Next to last line. "Small retail strips". That is plural and wrong. There is only one strip on the site. Page 3-46. Second paragraph from the bottom. 1-5 has five travel lanes north of S 320 Street and four lanes south of S 320 Street..." Will this change after all the road work is completed? C Page 3-47. "272 Street... connects Pacific Highway South to Interstate 5 and SR-516". Where is the SR-516 connection? Pages 3-66, 3-71, 3-72, 3-73. Why print City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan in italics? Page 3-76. Fourth paragraph down. Should "Part 1 Crimes" be "Priority 1 Crimes"? In Footnote 1, the first listing is "Priority E" with "Emergency" directly below. This is confusing and possibly redundant. Page 3-77. Table 3-31. The second column heading should be 2002, not 2001. Page 3-78. End of first paragraph. Isn't Fire Station 64 on S. 320th, not S. 360th? End of third paragraph. Pierce 105' should be Pierce 105 foot. Three lines from the bottom of the page: space needed between "27' and "percent". Page 3-79. Second, third and fourth line of Parks and Recreation. "Parkland" should be two words. Next to last paragraph, last line. Delete "public" before "residents". Last -� line of Parks and Recreation: change to "A Community Center and Pool at Celebration Park is currently under construction". Delete "is planned". r Page 3-80. Three lines from the end of Police commentary. Should there be a period after the middle initial in Brian J. Wilson's name? -1 Under Parks and Recreation, change "parkland" in third and fifth line to two words. a Last sentence of the page. Insert "an" after "of' and before "open space standard". Page 3-8 1. Second bulleted item. Correct department name is Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department. Page 3-82. I am confused. In one area the document talks about an average of 214 gallons consumption and then shortly after 225 gallons consumed. This needs to be clarified. Page 3-83. Two lines above Electricity heading. 44th what (Street, Drive, Place, Road, Court, Avenue)? Page 3-84. Third paragraph down. End of second line. Enchanted what (Parkway, Village etc.)? Page 3-85. Third line down. Why is the 'Y in Range, capitalized? Telecommunications and Wirelesss Networks. Is Air Touch still in business? I thought that company was bought by Vodaphone or Verizon. M MW City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Draft EIS Meeting Summary Draft EIS Public Meeting The meeting began at 5:00 PM on July 23, 2006 at the City of Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers. Staff inattendance were Patrick Doherty and Rick Perez from the City of Federal Way and Deborah Munkberg from Jones & Stokes. Deborah Munkberg provided a short overview of the proposal and findings of the Draft EIS. H. David Kaplan, 30240 27th Avenue South, Federal Way, provided the following comments: Mr. Kaplan asked why the entire Core and Frame areas were not included as the project area? Patrick Doherty explained that the City selected the area with the greatest potential for redevelopment as the project area. Mr. Kaplan noted that at a recent King County Library System meeting, there was discussion of purchase of an office property next to the 320th library. He observed that the project area for the Planned Action EIS does not include this site and was concerned about whether not being included in the Planned Action area would create a difficulty for redevelopment of that site. Mr. Doherty confirmed that was correct and said that the benefit of a planned action designation would be greatest for larger projects, rather than small individual office projects. Mr. Kaplan stated that the City should provide information to the public on the boundaries of the project area and should look for ways to get information about the benefits of the planned action designation to developers. Mr. Kaplan stated that he preferred Alternative 2 to Alternative 1. He noted that the lowest elevation of the project area is south of South 320th Street and rises to the northern boundary of the project area. He stated that buildings should stair -step up the hill, with taller buildings located on the properties to the north, which have views to the south, including Mount Rainier. He would prefer to allow development to spread out rather than concentrate along South 320th Street. He stated that Alternative 2 would permit more variety, balance the density better, provide more open space for development, and result in more dispersed transportation impacts. Mr. Doherty explained that the northern portion of the project area is actually in the City Center Frame, rather than the Core and that building height limits are lower in the Frame than in the Core. Mr. Kaplan stated that should be considered as a change. Mr. Doherty acknowledged the comments, stating that it was a policy issue that has been raised in other settings, but is not part of the proposal for this EIS. Mr. Kaplan reiterated his preference for Alternative 2. Mr. Doherty stated that the purpose of the alternatives in the EIS was to bracket the range of possible future scenarios and that either scenario could potentially occur in the future. Mr. Kaplan stated that, if that's the case, then the designation of "alternatives" was confusing and should be clarified in the EIS. Mr. Kaplan asked about the mitigation measure that calls for an additional right turn lane from 20th onto South 320th, specifically about the building that was recently built at this location? Mr. Perez stated that a new sidewalk would have to be routed around the building. Mr. Doherty noted that this mitigation measure is intended to address Saturday peak hour conditions. Historically, the City has not collected mitigation for the Saturday peak, but has focused on the PM peak hour. Mr. Doherty stated that this does not mean that the City won't mitigate for the Saturday peak hour, but that that policy decision has not been made yet. Mr. Kaplan asked about the mitigation measure calling for an additional right turn lane from 23rd South onto South 320th, specifically the sidewalk in this location? Mr. Doherty stated that the sidewalk would have to be replaced. Mr. Kaplan asked what is the open space requirement for mixed use? Mr. Doherty summarized recent zoning code changes in the Core. He said that open space is required to gain additional height, for example from 95' to 145" under the current Code. Mr. Kaplan asked what type of open space is permitted? Mr. Doherty responded that open space is whatever would work in the location, including paved plazas and landscaped areas. Mr. Kaplan asked how mixed use would be considered, as residential or office in terms of which height limit would apply? Mr. Doherty responded that the commercial base would be governed by commercial standards and the residential floors above would be considered residential. Mr. Doherty noted that for residential uses, there is a requirement of 200 sf of open space per unit. He said that this could be provided either as public open space, or as private open space, including private workout rooms in residential buildings, rooftop gardens, balconies and other similar features. Mr. Kaplan identified corrections needed to Figure 7 and asked how "redevelopable" properties were identified. Ms. Munkberg stated that is based on the City's Buildable Lands methodology, which considers property to be redevelopable if the structure is valued at 50% or less of the property value according to the King County Assessor's office. Mr. Kaplan stated that should be more clearly stated in the EIS. Mr. Doherty commented that the City will consider local knowledge in addition to this methodology in revising this figure for the Final EIS. Mr. Kaplan specifically asked whether the former Toys R Us and Target buildings would now be considered redevelopable sites. Mr. Doherty and Ms. Munkberg indicated that they would consider those sites as potential "redevelopable" sites for these purposes. Mr. Kaplan also indicated that two sites indicated as "vacant" in Figure 7 were now developed or under development: the Woodstone Credit Union site on 316th and the Original Roadhouse Grill site at 316th and 20th Ave. Mr. Kaplan noted that the Federal Way Transit Center label should be removed in Figure 8. Mr. Kaplan stated that he intended to review the document more fully and provide written comment to the City by the July 25 deadline for written comment. The meeting ended at 6:00 pm. 4.2 Responses to Comments Comment Letters Comment Number l Response _ Letter 1: King County Department of Trans ortation j 1 Your preference for Alternative 1 is noted. Please see the updated text in Chapter 2 of this FEIS that clarifies that the action alternatives are provided in the EIS for purpose of comparison and analysis. Adoption of a planned action designation by the City would apply to the project area as a whole; adoption of a specific action alternative is not necessn for implementation of the proposal. 2 The transit route corrections that you note have been inserted in Section 3.4, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 3 Your comments are acknowledged. The City will work with development project applicants to ensure that the bus sto2 information that you refer to is included in individual project reviews as appropriate. Letter 2: Lakehaven Utility District The service provider correction that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this 1 FEIS. The correction to the document title that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of 2 this FEIS. The insertion of "gpolgallons per day" to Table 3-34 that you recommend is shown Section 3.6, 3 Chapter 3 of this FEIS. The phrase "available fire flow" has been inserted per your comment, please see Section 3.6, 4 Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 5 "Pressure zone boundary" has been inserted in place of "pressure boundary" per your comment, lease see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. Reference to commercial reuse has been deleted, see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 6 7 The referenced sentence has been re -worded per your comment, see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. The service provider correction that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this 8 FEIS. 9 The correction that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. This correction clarifies that Lakehaven treats sewer effluent in more than a single treatment plant. 10 The text that you refer to has been shifted to the correct location in the discussion of domestic water service, please see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. Your comments are acknowledged. 11 12 Mr. French's correct title has been inserted in Chapter 3 of this FEIS. Letter 3: H. David Kaplan Carbon monoxide has been written out adjacent to the acronym CO. Please see FEIS Chapter 1. 1 2 Nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter smaller than 10 microns, National Ambient Air Quality Standards, and Puget Sound Clean Air Authority have all been written out next to their acronyms. Nitrogen dioxide is used in place of oxides of nitrogen as the term commonly used and understood by the lay reader. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 4-11 Comment Letters Comment Number Response 3 Structured parking is included as an element of the Proposed Action, which is why it is called out specifically in Table 1-1. Surface parking will continue to be permitted in the City Center project area, but is not identified as a specific type of development because it is not an element of the Proposed Action. 4 The typographical error that you note has been corrected. "Streetlights" has been divided into two words, "street lights." Please see Chapter 1 of this FEIS. 5 The term "parkland" has been divided into two words, "park lands" here and elsewhere in the document. Please see Chapters 1 and 3 of this FEIS. 6 Crime prevention through environmental design and Puget Sound Energy have been spelled out next to their acronyms. The typographical error that you note has been corrected. Please see Chapter 1 of this FEIS. 7 Transportation demand management has been spelled out next to the acronym. Please see Chapter 1 of this FEIS. 8 The name of Lake Doloff has been corrected in Figure 1 of this FEIS. 9 The "c" is in brackets because it is lower case and the text that it is extracted from is in upper case. The brackets are a convention intended to show that the quote was modified from the original source. 10 The acronym for carbon monoxide has been added, please see Section 3.1, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. Nitrogen Dioxide has been left as is because it is a term that is in more common use than oxides of nitrogen and more likely to be understood by the lay reader. 11 The title of the Clean Air Act has been corrected, please see Section 3.1, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 12 The acronym CO has been inserted in place of carbon monoxide, please see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 13 The vacant and redevelopable land information has been updated. Please see Section 3.2, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 14 The City of Federal Way has been inserted as a major employer. Please see Section 3.2, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 15 The reference to Table 3-11 has been deleted. Please see section 3.2, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 16 The measurement "feet" has been written out, see Section 3.2, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 17 The correction to the number of outbuildings on the Mall property has bee inserted in Section 3.2, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 18 Updated information for Example Development Area 2 has been inserted, see Section 3.3, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 19 Updated information for Example Development Area 4 has been inserted, see Section 3.3, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 20 Updated information for Example Development Area 6 has been inserted, see Section 3.3, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 21 According to the Federal Way Department of Public Works, the final lane configuration has not been finalized. 22 272nd Street connects to SR 516 approximately 5 miles to the east of I-5 on the east side of Kent. 23 Italics were used as a convention in the DEIS to denote the titles of documents. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 4-12 Comment Letters Comment Number Response 24 "Part 1 Crimes" is the term provided by the City of Federal Way Police Department. The word "emergency" in Footnote 1 is intended to clarify the meaning of "Priority E." 25 The correction that you provided has been inserted in Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 26 As you note, the correct address for Fire Station 64 is 3700 South 320th Street, Auburn. This and the remaining corrections that you note in this comment have been inserted in Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. The word "parkland" has been revised to "park land" in the noted locations. The word "public" has 27 been deleted as suggested and the referenced sentence has been changed to state that the community center and pool at Celebration Park are currently under construction. Please see Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 28 The punctuation correction that you note has been inserted, see Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 29 The word "parkland" has been revised to "park land" in the noted locations. 30 The grammatical correction that you noted has been inserted in Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 31 The correction to the name of the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department has been inserted in Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. Please see DEIS, page 3-82. In the Federal Way area, the average daily consumption per 32 residential equivalent is 214 gallons. This compares to 225 gallons per day per residential equivalent during peak periods. The difference between the two numbers is the difference between average and peak period use. 33 The reference has been corrected to read 44th Ave S. Please see Section 3.5, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. 34 "Enchanted" is the full name of the future distribution substation planned by Puget Sound Energy. 35 Capitalization has been corrected and the reference to AirTouch has been corrected to Verizon Wireless. Please see Section 3.6, Chapter 3 of this FEIS. Public Hearing Comment Number Response As noted in the meeting summary, the City selected a portion of the City Center sub -area judged to 1 have the greatest potential for redevelopment. Comments are acknowledged. 2 3 Comments are acknowledged. 4 Comments regarding preference for Alternative 2 are acknowledged. Please see the updated text in Chapter 2 of this FEIS that clarifies that the action alternatives are provided in the EIS for purpose of comparison and analysis. Adoption of a planned action designation by the City would apply to the project area as a whole; adoption of a specific action alternative is not necessary for implementation of the proposal. 5 Comments regarding building heights in the City Center Core and Frame are acknowled ed. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 4-13 Public Hearing Comment Number Response 6 Comments regarding preference for Alternative 2 are acknowledged. Please see the updated text in Chapter 2 of this FEIS that clarifies that the action alternatives are provided in the EIS for purpose of comparison and analysis. Adoption of a planned action designation by the City would apply to the project area as a whole; adoption of a specific action alternative is not necessary for implementation of the proposal. 7 Question regarding the mitigation measure calling for an additional right turn lane from 20th Ave S to S 320th St is acknowledged. As noted in the meeting summary, a new sidewalk would have to be routed around the building. As also noted, this measure would mitigate for Saturday impacts, which is a policy decision yet to be made by the City. 8 Question regarding the mitigation measure calling for an additional right turn lane from 23rd Ave S to S 320th Ave is acknowledged. As noted n the meeting summary, the sidewalk would have to be replaced. 9 Questions and comments regarding open space requirements for residential uses in the Core are acknowledged. 10 The question regarding how mixed use is considered for purposes of open space requirements is acknowledged. As noted in the meeting summary, the portion of a mixed -use building that is residential would be considered residential. 11 Comments regarding corrections to DEIS Figure 7 are acknowledged and have been inserted in Section 3.2, Cha ter 3 of this FEIS. 12 The Federal Way Transit Center label has been removed from Figures 2 and 8. Please see revised figures in this FEIS. �13 Please refer to comments and responses to Letter #3. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 4-14 Chapter 5 References 5.1 Printed References Federal Way Fire Department, 2004. 2003 Annual Report. Federal Way, City of. 1993. Draft Environmental Impact Statement Comprehensive Plan: Cityshape from Vision to Plan. 1995. Final Environmental Impact Statement Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations. March 18, 2002. Federal Way Potential Annexation Area Inventory. 1 2006. Comprehensive Plan. http://www.ci.federal-way.wa.us/ 1 2006. Chapter 22 City Code. http://search.mrsc. org/nxt/gateway.dll/fdwymc?f=templates&fn=fdwypage.htm$vid=municodes:Fede ralWay 2003. Zoning and Wetland Atlas. http://www.ci.federal-way.wa.us/gis/zoning/zindx.htm. King County. September 2002. King County Buildable Lands Evaluation Report 2002. http://www.metrokc.gov/budget/buildland/bldlnd02.htm King County, 2006. GIS Center Parcel Viewer. http://www.metrokc.gov/gis/mapportal/PViewer—main.htm KJS Associates, Inc. (KJS). 1995. Guidebook for Conformity. KJS Associates, Inc. Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). 2003. Air Quality Conformity Analysis: 2003 Air Quality Amendment to the Regional Transportation Improvement Program. August 2003. Sound Transit. September 2001. NEPA Environmental Assessment for the Federal Way Transit Center/Parking Structure, and HOV Direct Access Ramp Project. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1992. User's guide to CAL3QHC version 2.0: a modeling methodology for predicting pollutant concentrations near roadway intersections. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Technical Support Division, Research Triangle Park, NC. November. EPA 454/R-92-006. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 5-1 5.2 Personal Communications Ausburn, Mary. Puget Sound Energy. Personal communication with Jamie Burrell of Jones & Stokes, Oct 1, 2003. French, Stan. Lakehaven Utility District, General Mali gefWater 4ua]ity/Production Engineer. Personal communication with Evan Nelson of Jones & Stokes, 2006. Gaspard, Grant. South King County Fire and Rescue. Personal communication with Evan Nelson of Jones & Stokes, 2006. Landon, Michelle, Crime Analyst, Federal Way Department of Public Safety. Personal Communications with Evan Nelson of Jones & Stokes, 2006 McGourty, Kelly. 2005. Puget Sound Regional Council. MOBILE6.2 CO emission factors e-mailed to Jim Wilder of Jones & Stokes. Sanders, Betty. City of Federal Way Parks and Recreation. Personal communication with Evan Nelson of Jones & Stokes, 2006. Wilson, Brian, Deputy Chief. Federal Way Police Department. Personal communication with Jamie Burrell of Jones & Stokes, Oct 7, 2003. Letter transmittal Nov. 4, 2003. City Center Planned Action Draft Planned Action EIS 5-2 1 Appendix 1 Distribution List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION EIS 11 Distribution List 2006 FEIS DISTRIBUTION LIST' NATIONAL, STATE, COUNTY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT CITY OF KENT, PLANNING SERVICES - 400 WEST GOWE STREET, KENT, WA 98032 1 CITY OF TACOMA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -- 747 MARKET STREET, TACOMA WA 98402 * CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - CITY MANAGER - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718 * CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 * CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718 Ji * CITY OF FEDERAL WAY - PUBLIC WORKS - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718 * CITY OF FEDERAL WAY- PUBLIC SAFETY - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718 * CITY OF FEDERAL WAY- MANAGEMENT SERVICES - P.O. BOX 9718 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718 * SOUTH KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT - 31617 1 ST AVE S., FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 CITY OF AUBURN, 25 WEST MAIN, AUBURN WA 98001 CITY OF PACIFIC, 100 THIRD AVENUE SE, PACIFIC, WA 98047 CITY OF DES MOINES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 21630 11TH AVE SOUTH SUITE D, DES MOINES WA 98198 CITY OF MILTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -- 1000 LAUREL STREET, MILTON WA 98354 CITY OF EDGEWOOD PLANNING DEPT - 2221 MERIDIAN AVE EAST, EDGEWOOD WA 98371 ECON. DEV. COUNCIL OF SEATTLE & KING CO. -- 1301 5TH AVENUE, SUITE 2500, SEATTLE WA 98101 KING CO DEPT OF DEV & ENVIRON SERVICES - 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA * KING CO DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION -- 201 S. JACKSON STREET, KSC-TR-0815 SEATTLE, WA 98104 CITY OF FIFE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 5411 23RD STREET EAST, FIFE WA 98424 * FEDERAL WAY REGIONAL LIBRARY, KING CO LIBRARY SYSTEM - 342 1 ST WAY S, FEDERAL WAY 98003 * FEDERAL WAY 320TH LIBRARY, KING CO LIBRARY SYSTEM - 848 S 320TH, FEDERAL WAY 98003 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS -- 31405 - 18TH AVE. S., FEDERAL WAY, WA, 98003 METRO TRANSIT -- 201 S. JACKSON ST., KSC-TR-0415 SEATTLE, WA 98104 PIERCE COUNTY PLANNING AND LAND SERVICES -- 2401 SOUTH 35TH STREET, TACOMA WA 98409 PIERCE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AND UTILITIES - 2702 SOUTH 42ND STREET, TACOMA WA 98409 PIERCE TRANSIT, P.O. BOX 99070, 3701 96TH ST SW, LAKEWOOD, WA 98499 * PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY - 110 UNION STREET, SUITE 500, SEATTLE WA 98101 * PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL - 1011 WESTERN AVENUE, #500 SEATTLE WA 98104 * SOUND TRANSIT - 401 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SEATTLE WA 98104 * WA ST DEPT OF ECOLOGY (2) -- SEPA UNIT, PO BOX 47703, OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 * WA ST DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION -- PO BOX 47331 310 MAPLE PARK AVENUE SE, OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7331 F� WA ST ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL - 615 SECOND AVENUE, SUITE 380, SEATTLE WA 98104 1 * RECEIVED A PAPER OR CD COPY. ALL OTHERS RECEIVED NOTICE. APPENDIX 1 MY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION EIS * WA STATE DEPT OF CTED, GROWTH MGMT SVCS - 906 COLUMBIA STREET SW, OLYMPIA WA 98501 WA STATE OFFICE OF GOVERNOR - PO BOX 40002, OLYMPIA WA 98504 WA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTR - PO BOX 47200, OLYMPIA WA 98504 UTILITIES. BONNEVILLE POWER ASSOCIATION, PO BOX 3621, PORTLAND OR 97208 KING COUNTY OFFICE OF CABLE COMMUNICATION -- 700 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2300 SEATTLE, WA 98104 COMCAST CABLE -- 2200 N 30TH ST TACOMA WA 98403 * LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT -- 31627-1 ST AVENUE SOUTH • P.O. BOX 4249 • FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 QWEST -- 2001 6TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98121-2855 PUGET SOUND ENERGY -- 10885 NE 4TH STREET P.O. BOX 97034 BELLEVUE WA 98004 TACOMA PUBLIC UTLITIES, 3628 S 35TH STREET, TACOMA WA 98409 CITY COUNCIL & COMMISSIONS * FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL (7 COPIES) 33325 8TH AVE S PO BOX 9718, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718 FEDERAL WAY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 33325 8TH AVE S PO BOX 9718, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 * FEDERAL WAY PLANNING COMMISSION (8 COPIES) 33325 8TH AVE S PO BOX 9718, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063-9718 NEWSPAPERS DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE - 83 COLUMBIA STREET, SEATTLE WA 98104 FEDERAL WAY MIRROR, 1414 S. 324TH ST, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY NEWS, 14006 1ST AVENUE SOUTH SUITE B BURIEN WA 98168 SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL - 600 WASHINGTON AVE SOUTH, KENT WA 98032 SEATTLE POST INTELLIGENCER - 101 ELLIOTT AVE WEST, SEATTLE WA 98119 SEATTLE TIMES - PO BOX 70, SEATTLE WA 98109 NEWS TRIBUNE - 1950 SOUTH STATE STREET, TACOMA WA 98405 ORGANIZATIONS FEDERAL WAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, P.O. BOX 3440 FEDERAL WAY, WA 98063 MASTER BUILDERS OF KING AND SNOHOMISH COUNTIES, 335 116TH AVE SE, BELLEVUE WA 98004 INDIVIDUALS .r....�.. ,.. -L _ * H. DAVID KAPLAN, 30240 27TH AVE SOUTH, FEDERAL WAY 98003 APPENDIX 1 0 Prepared by FEHR,'PEERS Safeco Plaza 1001 4th Avenue, Suite 4120 Seattle, WA 98154 www.fehrandpeers.com (206) 576-4220 VIXTLCOME TO CITY OF F �rRl •r• 411 plop• '� - -rt- - IF Ar i 1 W. • ..��+ • • � - - _ .. • r � A • - - - . Aw December, 2015 Federal Way City Center Transportation Impact Analysis Fehr & Peers December 18, 2015 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Ta b I e of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................................................1 ProjectDescription...................................................................................................................................1 AffectedEnvironment..................................................................................................................................2 StudyArea................................................................................................................................................2 ExistingRoadway Network......................................................................................................................4 Project Area and Existing Land Use........................................................................................................7 CorridorRight-of-Way...............................................................................................................................9 ExistingTraffic Operations.......................................................................................................................9 Parking.................................................................................................................................................. 15 CollisionAnalysis...... ....................................................... ..................................................................... 15 TransitServices.....................................................................................................................................19 PedestrianFacilities.............................................................................................................................. 21 BicycleFacilities.................................................................................................................................... 23 FutureConditions...................................................................................................................................... 25 FutureYear Land Use........................................................................................................................... 25 Roadway Improvements Assumptions................................................................................................. 25 TripGeneration..................................................................................................................................... 28 Trip Generation Differences Explained............................................................................................ 29 Trip Distribution and Assignment ................................................................................................. 29 Im pacts...................................................................................................................................................... 31 TrafficOperations Impact..................................................................................................................... 31 Commonto All Alternatives.............................................................................................................. 31 NoAction Alternative........................................................................................................................ 31 ActionAlternative.............................................................................................................................. 36 Future Parking Requirements.............................................................................................................. 40 Commonto All Alternatives.............................................................................................................. 40 TrafficSafety Impact...... ....................................................................................................................... 40 Commonto All Alternatives....................................................................................... 40 TransitService Impact.......................................................................................................................... 41 Commonto All Alternatives.............................................................................................................. 41 ActionAlternative.............................................................................................................................. 41 Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Impact............................................................................................... 43 Commonto All Alternatives.............................................................................................................. 43 December 2015 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Mitigation................................................................................................................................................... 46 ExistingRoadway Network............................................................................................................... 46 Parking............................................................................................................................................... 46 AdditionalMitigation.............................................................................................................................47 ALTERNATIVE MODE SUPPORT MEASURES....................................................................................48 OTHERSTRATEGIES.......................................................................................................................... 49 December 2015 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figures Figure 1. PM Peak Hour Distribution and Study Intersections.................................................................3 Figure 2. Functional Classification.............................................................................................................6 Figure3. Project Location...........................................................................................................................8 Figure 4. Existing Conditions V/C Ratio AM Peak Hour......................................................................... 12 Figure 5. Existing Conditions V/C Ratio PM Peak Hour......................................................................... 13 Figure 6. Existing Conditions V/C Ratio Saturday Midday Peak Hour .................................................. 14 Figure 7. Collision Density Heat Map...................................................................................................... 18 Figure8. Transit Facilities....................................................................................................................... 20 Figure9. Pedestrian Facilities................................................................................................................. 22 Figure10. Bicycle Facilities...... ....... ................ -- ................................................................................ - 24 Figure 11. Transportation Improvement Project Map........................................................................... 27 Figure12. Trip Distribution...................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 13. No Action Alternative V/C Ratio AM Peak Hour................................................................... 33 Figure 14. No Action V/C Ratio PM Peak Hour ................................................ ......... 34 Figure 15. No Action V/C Ratio Saturday Midday Peak Hour................................................................ 35 Figure 16. Action V/C Ratio AM Peak Hour............................................................................................ 37 Figure 17. Action V/C Ratio PM Peak Hour............................................................................................ 38 Figure 18. Action V/C Ratio Saturday Midday Peak Hour..................................................................... 39 Figure 19. Future Transit Network.......................................................................................................... 42 Figure 20. Planned Pedestrian Network................................................................................................. 44 Figure 21. Planned Bicycle Network....................................................................................................... 45 Tables Table 1. Land Use Mix by Alternative..........................................................................................................2 Table 2. Study Intersections Included in Analyses...................................................................................4 Table3. Existing Land Use.........................................................................................................................7 Table 4. Right -of -Way for Major Area Streets............................................................................................9 Table 5. Existing Conditions Intersection Analysis Results................................................................... 11 Table 6. Existing Parking Requirements.................................................................................................. 15 Table 7. Five-year Collision Rates (2010 - 2014).................................................................................. 16 Table 8. City Center Land Use Future No Action and Action Alternatives ............................................ 25 Table 9. Transportation Improvement Projects through 2025............................................................. 26 Table 10. Changes to Study Intersection from TIP................................................................................ 26 Table 11. Trip Generation by Alternative................................................................................................. 28 Table 12. 2025 No Action Alternatives Operations Analysis................................................................. 32 Table 13. 2025 Action Alternative Operations Analysis......................................................................... 36 Table 14. Future Parking Requirements.............................................................. ... 40 ................................ Appendix This appendix includes the intersection geometries, existing intersection traffic counts, future turning movement forecasts, and level of service (LOS) summaries. December 2015 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Introduction This study describes the transportation impacts associated with the development under the proposed planned action designation in the Federal Way City Center (FWCC) project located in Federal Way, WA. This study assesses the expected impact of the proposed land use changes in the City Center planning area on the City's transportation systems, including roadway intersections, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian facilities, and identifies actions and improvements to mitigate the impacts. The study follows the City of Federal Way Public Works Department Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses (September 9, 2014). Individual development projects proposed within the Federal Way City Center planning area may be required to provide additional analysis of the specific impact of their project on the transportation system as directed by the Director of Public Works. Project Description The proposed Federal Way City Center will develop an urbanized central core within Federal Way containing a mix of land uses including housing, retail, and civic uses. The City's Comprehensive Plan describes the principal purposes of the Federal Way City Center as to: ■ Create an identifiable downtown that is the social and economic focus of the City; Strengthen the City as a whole by providing for long-term growth in employment and housing; • Promote housing opportunities close to employment; ■ Support development of an extensive regional transportation system; • Reduce dependency on automobiles; • Consume less land with urban development; • Maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services; • Reduce costs of and time required for permitting; ■ Provide a central gathering place for the community; and ■ Improve the quality of urban design for all developments. This vision will be carried out by encouraging a compact form of development that will mix retail, commercial, and residential land uses. The FWCC transit center and the FWCC Park & Ride will be a key component of the planning area, supported by a high level of non -motorized facilities, amenities, and transit services that will reduce dependency on the automobile and provide transportation choices. This report summarizes the analysis of the following alternatives: • 2015 Existing Conditions. • 2025 No Action Alternative includes an increase in land use in the City Center area. It assumes the funded Transportation Improvement Projects would be completed in the study area. ■ 2025 Action Alternative includes an increase in land use over the No Action Alternative for Federal Way's City Center and the same funded Transportation Improvement Project projects. The primary difference between the future No Action and Action alternatives is the land use mix. The Action Alternative provides an increase in the amount of office space, residential, and hotel space. Table 1 displays the land use mix by alternative. December 2015 Page - 1 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Table 1. Land Use Mix by Alternative Retail (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Residential units Hotel rooms Existing 1.833.189 67,045 254 230 No Action 2,505,379 329,427 1,925 230 Action 2,308.190 467,045 2,654 830 Affected Environment This section summarizes the selection of the study area, existing roadway network, the project area and existing land use. This section also summarizes the findings of the traffic operations of existing intersections and collisions analysis. The existing transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities are also described. Study Area This section summarizes the approach for analyzing 2015 Existing Conditions for intersections and corridors in the study area; the City of Federal Way's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses (September 9, 2014), was used to guide the analysis approach and provides greater detail. The study area, which is larger than the Planned Action Area, was developed by usingthe city's travel demand model to calculate the anticipated vehicle volume increase at intersections. Study intersections were identified for analysis if they met the following conditions: PM peak hour: Intersection is signalized and outside the City Center with an increase of 30 or more vehicle trips and a volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio over 0.7. All intersections surrounding the City Center area were included in the study area provided they met the City's threshold AM and Saturday mid -day peak hours: Intersection is anticipated to experience an increase of 100 or more vehicle trips. All intersections surrounding the City Center that were included in the PM analysis were included in AM and Saturday analysis. The study area intersections are presented in Table 2. Figure 1 presents the PM distribution along with the study intersections. A percentage of total trips generated from the City Center area was used to determine the intersections potentially impacted by the development. More intersections were analyzed during the PM peak hour because vehicle volumes were greater compared to the AM and Saturday Midday peak hours. Also, this provided a more conservative analysis of the overall study a rea. December 2015 Page - 2 W Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis December 2015 Figure 1. PM Peak Hour Distribution and Study Intersections F` Study Intersections Trip Distribution - PM Action i AM&PM <1% AM, PM & Saturday - 1% - 3% PM - 4%-6% • PM & Saturday 71/.- 9% - > 9% Downtown Core City of Federal Way A Page - 3 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Table 2. Study Intersections Included in Analyses Intersection PM AM Saturday *S 272 Street & Military Road S X X S 288 Street & Pacific Hwy S X X S 288 Street & Military Road S X X SW 320 Street & 21 Avenue SW X X S 320 Street & 1 Avenue S X X X S 320 Street & 1-5 SB Ramp X X X S 320 Street & 1-5 NB Ramp X X X S 320 Street & Military Road S X X X SW 336 Street & 21 Avenue SW X S 336 Street & Pacific Hwy S X X X SW 340 Street & Hoyt Road SW X SW Campus Drive & 1 Avenue S X S 348 Street & Pacific Hwy S X X X S 348 Street & SR 161 X X SW 356 Street & 21 Avenue SW X S 356 Street & 1 Avenue S X S 356 Street & Pacific Hwy S X X X S 356 Street & Enchanted Parkway S X X **S 312 Street & 28 Avenue S X X S 316 Street & Pacific Hwy S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 312 Street & Pacific Hwy S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 320 Street & Pacific Hwy S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 320 Street & 20 Avenue S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 320 Street & 23 Avenue S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 324 Street & Pacific Hwy S X - CC X - CC X - CC Number of Intersections Analyzed 25 18 15 X: Study area intersection included in analysis X-CC: denotes City Center intersection included in analysis * Intersection is located outside of City of Federal Way limits *' Unsignalized Intersection Existing Roadway Network The existing street network around the City Center is mostly grid -like with four legged intersections. Interstate-5 (1-5), Pacific Highway/ State Route 99 (SR 99), and State Route 161 (SR 161) are in the study area and provide regional access to the north and south. Access ramps to 1-5 are provided at 272nd Street, 32Oth Street, and 348th Street. 1-5 is a limited access facility that provides four general purpose lanes and a high occupancy vehicle lane in each direction. The posted speed limit is 60 miles per hour. Pacific Highway South (SR 99) is a Principal Arterial with five to seven travel lanes, including HOV lanes and turning lanes at intersections. The posted speed limit on SR 99 is 40 mph south of S 3O4th Street and 45 mph north of S 3O4th Street. SR99 provides access to Seattle and SeaTac International Airport to the north and December 2015 Page - 4 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis the city of Tacoma to the south. SR 161 provides access to the City of Puyallup. It is a five lane arterial with a posted speed limit ranging from 40 mph to 45 mph. S 272^d Street is a Principal Arterial that runs east -west and provides the City Limits to the north. S 272nd Street provides access to SR 99 at a signalized intersection, as well as ramps to access 1-5 northbound and southbound. The roadway has four travel lanes with additional turn lanes. S 320th Street is a Principal Arterial that runs east -west. The roadway has seven travel lanes in the City Center and five travel lanes outside of the City Center with additional turning lanes at intersections. The roadway provides access to SR 99 at a signalized intersection and access ramps to 1-5 northbound and southbound. S 320th Street between SR 99 and 1-5 carries over 35,000 vehicles per day. S 348th Street is a Principal Arterial that runs east -west; it becomes SW Campus Drive west of 1st Avenue S and SR 18 east of Pacific Highway S. S 348th Street has five travel lanes. SR 18 is a state owned divided highway with two to four lanes in each direction. The roadway provides regional access continuing east through Auburn and northeast to 1-90 in Snoqualmie. The functional classification of Federal Way's roadway network is shown in Figure 2. December 2015 Page - 5 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 2. Functional Classification Functional Classification Study Intersections Downtown Core Freeway 49 AM & PM City of Federal Way - Principal Arterial 0 AM, PM & Saturday - Minor AnerW ■ PM - Principal Collector s PM & Saturday - Minor Collector December 2015 Page - 6 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Project Area and Existing Land Use The City Center project area is bounded by S 324th Street to the south, 23rd Avenue South to the east, S 312th Street to the north, and SR 99 to the west. Figure 3 shows the Federal Way City Center project area. The City Center area is a mix of retail, office, senior housing, multi -family households, and hotels. This area provides the greatest concentration of shopping and businesses in the city of Federal Way. There are also businesses located on the west side of SR 99 and the area outside of the City Center is mostly residential. The square footage of the City Center is summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Existing Land Use Retail (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Residential Hotel (units) (rooms) 2015 Existing 1,833,189 67,045 254 230 Conditions December 2015 Page - 7 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Corridor Right -of -Way The Federal Way Revised Code Section 1.05.020 defines right-of-way as, "land owned, dedicated or conveyed to the public or a unit of government, used primarily for the movement of vehicles or pedestrians and providing for access to adjacent parcels, with the secondary purpose of providing space for utility lines and appurtenances and other devices and facilities benefiting the public. "Right-of-way" includes, but is not limited to, any street, easement, sidewalk, or portion thereof under the jurisdiction of the city." The City of Federal Way's Comprehensive Plan provides a network of "City Center" roadways that meet the higher level of amenities for the Federal Way City Center planning area (Figure 3). The need for wider sidewalks, bicycle lanes, street lighting, and street trees resulted in the City designating specific standards for Federal Way City Center roadways. Table 4 summarizes the required and the typical amounts of right-of-way found on major roadways within the Federal Way City Center planning area. I able 4. KlIgnt-oT-way Tor major Area Required City Roadway Center right- of -way JLreetS Existing right - of -way Pacific Highway S (SR 99) 120 feet 100-140 feet S 3241' Street 96 feet 66 feet S 320d' Street 100 feet 100-140 feet S 31 &h Street 74 feet 60 feet S 312"h Street 85 feet 60-85 feet 20th Avenue S 60 feet 60 feet 23rd Avenue S 85 feet 80-82 feet Source: King County Assessor 2003 As summarized in Table 4, Pacific Highway S, S 324th Street, S 316th Street, S 312th Street and 23rd Avenue S all have inadequate right-of-way. In addition, the City Center plan calls for a number of internal roadways to create smaller blocks that will improve the grid network and improve the access for pedestrians and vehicles. These internal grid roads require 70 feet of right-of-way with two vehicle lanes, 12 feet of sidewalks, and on -street parking. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements shall be a component of the development submittal phase of a proposed project within the Federal Way City Center. Additional information on ultimate roadway cross -sections can be found in Map III-4 of the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Existing Traffic Operations Traffic counts were collected in Fall 2014 or July 8, 2015 between 4:00 pm and 6:00 pm and Wednesday July 8, 2015 between 6:00 am and 8:00 am. Saturday traffic counts were collected July 11, 2015 between 11:00 am and 1:00 pm. The analysis of intersections was completed for the highest hour of vehicle traffic for the AM, PM, and Saturday midday peak hours. In 2015, the city of Federal Way revised their level of service (LOS) standard for intersections. This standard is used to determine whether an intersection is operating at an acceptable condition. The standard provides a volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio compared to the previous intersection average vehicle delay (also known as level of service or LOS). The current standard states that signalized intersections should have a volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio less than 1.2 outside of the City Center or December 2015 Page - 9 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis less than 1.0 at any unsignalized intersection. Signalized intersections inside of the City Center should experience an average volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio of 1.1 or less. An intersection with a volume -to -capacity ratio greater than the standard is considered deficient and would require mitigation to bring the intersection into acceptable conditions. The traffic analysis software Synchro 8 was used to calculate the volume -to -capacity ratios by reporting results using the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 outputs. The volume -to -capacity ratio is determined for intersections using Highway Capacity Manual 2000 methodology because it provides an overall volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for signalized intersections. The unsignalized intersection of S 312 Street and 28th Avenue S was analyzed using Highway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology, and the approach movement with the highest volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio is reported. Table 5 and Figure 4 through Figure 6 summarize the results of the intersection operations analysis including intersection level of service (LOS), average intersection vehicle delay, and volume -to - capacity (v/c) ratio. None of the intersections were found to be deficient. The intersection geometries, existing intersection traffic counts, future turning movement forecasts, and level of service (LOS) summaries are found in the Appendix to this report. December 2015 Page - 10 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Table 5. Existing Conditions Intersection Analysis Results PM Peak Hour LOS Delay vlc ratio AM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour Study Intersections LOS Delay Vic ratio LOS Delay vlc ratio "S 272 Street & Military Road S D 48.9 0.83 D 44.7 0.73 S 288 Street & Military Road S D 51.7 0.74 D 39.8 0.51 S 288 Street & Pacific Highway S D 43.3 0.73 C 24.6 0.48 ""S 312 Street & 28 Avenue S D 32.3 0.93 A 8.8 0.29 S 320 Street & 1 Avenue S D 54.2 0.83 C 32.9 0.62 C 33.9 0.63 S 320 Street & 1-5 NB Ramp C 21.6 0.66 B 11.5 0.48 B 14.6 0.58 S 320 Street & 1-5 SIB Ramp C 30.2 0.70 B 11.9 0.56 B 18.4 0.69 S 320 Street & Military Road S D 53.2 0.79 C 29.9 0.69 D 48.5 0.67 S 336 Street & Pacific Highway S D 53.3 0.86 D 44.4 0.50 C 21.7 0.51 S 348 Street & Pacific Highway S E 64.4 0.86 C 34.1 0.70 D 52.9 0.89 S 348 Street & SR 161 E 72.6 0.97 E 78.5 1.08 S 356 Street & 1 Avenue S D 44.9 0.91 S 356 Street & Enchanted Parkway S D 43.6 0.84 C 25.7 0.62 S 356 Street & Pacific Highway S D 53.6 0.87 D 37.8 0.47 D 53.2 0.80 SW 320 Street & 21 Avenue SW D 41.6 0.80 C 31.4 0.52 SW 336 Street & 21 Avenue SW D 49.3 0.72 SW 340 Street & Hoyt Road SW C 34.6 0.76 SW 356 Street & 21 Avenue SW E 55.1 0.79 SW Campus Drive & 1 Avenue S D 42.5 0.64 S 312 Street & Pacific Highway S D 54.9 0.73 C 20.3 0.39 D 42.3 0.58 S 316 Street & Pacific Highway S D 54.7 0.69 A 7.8 0.22 C 28.8 0.59 S 320 Street & 20 Avenue S C 34.6 0.74 A 7.7 0.32 D 36.1 0.67 S 320 Street & 23 Avenue S D 48.3 0.81 C 25.3 0.53 C 30.1 0.66 S 320 Street & Pacific Highway S E 57.1 0.75 C 23.1 0.47 0.32 D 37.2 0.74 S 324 Street & Pacific Highway S D 48.0 0.82 B 18.1 D 35.6 0.71 Average vlc City Center 0.76 1 0.40 O.fi7 " Intersection is located outside of City of Federal Way limits "*Unsignalized Intersection December 2015 Page - 11 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 4. Existing Conditions VIC Ratio AM Peak Hour R y 5 272nd ST 10 ry 3 Puget Sound V 9 y eeY °�. S 298th ST O V1,aOS� VQy'r� Qyr .! ■ S 312th ST i 3�i' SW 320fh ST . . 320th 96 N W a x = ORThSHORE PKW4 6 � SW 3361h ST S 336th 5 T J r N o� S 34ath ST E 33rd ST NE � SW 3S6th 5T N Q ry9 C� O V/C Ratio - Existing AM Downtown Core < 0.25 City of Federal Way 0.25 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.75 • > 0.75 December 2015 Page -12 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 5. Existing Conditions VIC Ratio PM Peak Hour h S 272nd . Vl X Puget Sound U y G act 6 T i■ s 28eth ST oleti t Ku NQS� lip W 99 O� 4p a S 312th ST . SIV 32 . SW 320tlt ST . 320th 5* 00 0 0 .5 N o � r to N t4ORrySNORE PK*4 o a N!L SW 336th ST S 336th Sr IS LS • S 346th ST `. 33rd ST NE &SW 356th 5r . . t � � . 1 _ N W 'a t6` py k°i • SS M,9'44y ap S s - o � 4 V/C Ratio - Existing PM Downtown Core - • < 0.25 City of Federal Way �I 0.25 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.75 > 0.75 December 2015 Page -13 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 6. Existing Conditions WC Ratio Saturday Midday Peak Hour Puget Sound all y S 272nd ST rH 3 S s o �O d t S 2aeth ST at � ^� S 312th ST .%v32� SW 320th 5T + . *S 320th So 2 = Q V NO '?�ySHORE PKV44 SW 336th ST S 336th STO N Od - S 348th ST r • a ' 33rd ST NE F _ a 7 g SW 356th Sr _ N Q ate` T Zke � 92� 0 o F �f V/C Ratio - Existing Saturday Downtown Core < 0.25 City of Federal Way 0.25 - 0.50 i 0.51 - 0.75 > 0.75 December 2015 Page - 14 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Parking The existing number of parking stalls in the Federal Way City Center area reflects the more auto - orientated development pattern of current land uses. Table 6 summarizes the number of parking spaces required by City Code for each existing land use. Table 6. Existing Parking Requirements Retail Office Total Residential Hotel Spaces Per (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) (units) (rooms) Code City Code 1 per 300 sq. 1 per0 sq. 1.7 per unit 1 per room ' ft Existing Square Footage 1 1,833,189 67,045 254 230 Existing Parking Requirement per Code i 6,111 223 432 230 6.996 Data provided by the City estimates that there are approximately 8,960 parking stalls provided in the Federal Way City Center area. As summarizes in Table 6, nearly 2,000 additional parking stalls are provided above what existing code requires. Collision Analysis Review of historical collision data provides an indication of the location and severity of incidents at intersections and along corridors. Historical analysis is useful in understanding the typical types of collisions that occur at a particular location; however, the data may not be indicative of future collision rates or causes. A number of factors can contribute to collisions including: ■ Traffic congestion (ability to maneuver) ■ Driver skills (driver age and experience) Driver behavior (speeding, aggressiveness, driving while intoxicated) ■ Roadway geometrics (sight distance) ■ Weather conditions (rain, glare, snow) ■ Nature (animals, fallen trees) • Vehicle condition, equipment and maintenance (brakes, tires) ■ Roadway condition (pavement condition) Five years of collision data, 2010 through 2014, were analyzed to identify collision trends in the study area. The City requires the identification of high collision intersections and roadway corridors defined as follows: ■ A collision rate of more than 1.0 collision per million entering vehicles (MEV) at an intersection. A collision rate of more than 10.0 collisions per million vehicle miles (MVM) on a roadway segment. Roadway segments are defined as arterials and principal collectors between and including intersections of collectors and arterials. December 2015 Page -15 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Table 7 provides the calculated collision rates for the study intersections and roadway segments. Results indicate that three of the 23 intersections and one of the 15 roadway segments could be considered to have high collision rates. The City has either improved or planned to improve these locations to address high collision rates. Table 7. Five-year Collision Rates (2010 - 2014) Intersection' Total Collisions Collision Rate (MEV)Z S 288 Street & Military Road S 60 0.99 S 288 Street & Pacific Highway S 47 0.55 S 312 Street & 28 Avenue S 10 0.45 S 320 Street & 1 Avenue S 65 0.89 S 320 Street & 1-5 NB Ramp 7 0.09 S 320 Street & 1-5 SIB Ramp 25 0.29 S 336 Street & Pacific Highway S 62 0.68 S 348 Street & Pacific Highway S 36 0.32 S 348 Street & SR 161 82 0.58 S 356 Street & 1 Avenue S 21 0.38 S 356 Street & Enchanted Parkway S 24 0.39 S 356 Street & Pacific Highway S 37 0.44 0.66 SW 320 Street & 21 Avenue SW 45 SW 336 Street & 21 Avenue SW 79 1.12 SW 340 Street & Hoyt Road SW 28 0.65 SW 356 Street & 21 Avenue SW 25 0.43 SW Campus Drive & 1 Avenue S 38 0.56 S 312 Street & Pacific Highway S 106 1.36 S 316 Street & Pacific Highway S 57 0.86 S 320 Street & 20 Avenue S 45 0.61 S 320 Street & 23 Avenue S 73 0.81 S 320 Street & Pacific Highway S 125 1.09 S 324 Street & Pacific Highway S 43 0.57 Roadway Segment Total Collisions Collision Rate (MVMY 21st Avenue SW from SR 509 to S 356 St 233 3.03 1 st Avenue S from S 312 Street to S 356 St 191 3.73 SR 99 from S 272 Street to S 356 Street 1006 3.87 20th Avenue S from S 312 Street to S 320 Street 50 8.94 23rd Avenue S from S 312 Street to S 322 Street 88 8.52 28th Avenue S from S 312 Street to S 317 Street 8 2.93 S 312th Street from SR 99 to 28th Avenue S 131 9.76 S 316th Street from SR 99 to 23rd Avenue S 50 11.85 S 317th Street between 23rd Avenue S and 28th Avenue S 8 2.85 December 2015 Page - 16 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis S 320th Street from 1 st Avenue S to Military Rd 555 4.81 SW 320th Street from Hoyt Road to 1 st Avenue S 125 1.34 S 348th Street from 1st Avenue S to 1-5 182 173 3.12 SW Campus Drive from 21st Avenue SW to 1st Avenue S 2.71 SW 340th1336th Street from Hoyt Road to 21 st Avenue SW 165 4.66 S 356th Street from 1st Avenue S to 16th Avenue S/Enchanted Pkwy 102 4.29 Note: Bold values indicate high collision locations, as defined by City standards. ' The City does not maintain data for the study intersections at S 272 Street & Military Road S and S 320 Street & Military Road S 2 MEV = million entering vehicles; MVM = million vehicle miles Source: City of Federal Way Collision Database The City of Federal Way, in general, attributes the majority of collisions to congestion at roadways and intersections. The congestion related delay at intersections can result in driver risk -taking by attempting to reduce wait times. Improving mobility and access to all modes, reducing conflict points, and reducing travel delay may reduce some types of collision along the corridor. The City traffic engineering department monitors collision data and corrects roadway and intersection issues that could contribute to higher collision rates at specific locations. Figure 7 provides a collision density'heat map' for the analyzed intersections and roadway segments. December 2015 Page -17 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 7. Collision Density Heat Map Puget Sound 099 00 sy 32 x O NO � NSHORE PK`S4 G _x • �n 31 33rd ST NE C _ yt SW 320th ST 3 7 a is7 SW i yr LW 3S6th Sr Collision Density • Study Intersections High Downtown Core Low City of Federal Way h S 272nd s N x • • S 288th ST 99 N a a 3 �S 3721h ST 4 ■ z v S 336th S s ■ i s aaaa�, s�T a a N � x s� 0 December 2015 Page -18 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Transit Services Federal Way Transit Center is located within the City Center on S 317th Street between 215t Avenue S and 23rd Avenue S. Within the study area, S 324th Street, S 320th Street, and S 312th Street are used to access the Transit Center. The Transit Center is served by Sound Transit routes 574, 577, and 578, King County Metro routes Rapid Ride A, 179, 181, 182, 183, 187, 193, and 197, and Pierce Transit routes 402, 500, and 501. Bicycle lockers and 1,190 vehicle parking spaces are provided at the Transit Center. The parking lot is heavily used during the weekday. The Transit Center provides direct access to high -occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on 1-5. Several bus routes stop in Federal Way with 3,000 to 3,500 person trips made by public transit service each day. About three percent of peak hour trips within Federal Way are transit trips. Figure 8 summarizes transit facilities in the study area, including King County Metro, Sound Transit, and Pierce Transit service. December 2015 Page - 19 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 8. Transit Facilities OFederal Way Transit Center 0 Study Intersections • Transit Stops Downtown Core Transit Routes City of Federal Way December 2015 Page - 20 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Pedestrian Facilities The City of Federal Way has pedestrian connectivity with sidewalks on many streets in the study area. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Trail is a paved pedestrian trail that connects residential areas to parks. Although there are sidewalks connecting the residential area with the City Center, walking is not a popular mode choice to shopping because of the high volume and high speed of vehicles on the roadway network and the relatively long distance between destinations. Figure 9 summarizes existing pedestrian facilities in the City of Federal Way. December 2015 Page - 21 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 9. Pedestrian Facilities IT y NORrySHORE PK` V Study Intersections Existing Sidewalk ■ AM & PM Existing Paved Trail 0 AM, PM & Saturday Downtown Core ■ PM City of Federal Way S PM & Saturday ST # S 2B8th ST December 2015 Page - 22 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Bicycle Facilities The city's bicycle network consists of a range of facilities including bike lanes, wide shoulders, and the BPA Trail. The BPA Trail provides a connection for cyclists to the City Center. However, cyclists must cross SR 99, which may be a deterrent. Within the City of Federal Way, cyclists can bike on the sidewalk, except in the City Center where it is prohibited by ordinance. When surveyed as part of the Comprehensive Plan, residents cited a lack of bicycle infrastructure as the main cycling deterrent. Figure 10 summarizes existing bicycle facilities in the City. December 2015 Page - 23 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 10. Bicycle Facilities "rM4 NQS� ��Qo 0 O 'k 3Z SW 320th ST 3 i'j N S G a � ORTySNORE PRE 'I SW IV61h ST J 1 33rd ST NE Study Intersections 0 AM&PM Q) AM, PM & Saturday a PM C PM & Saturday Existing Bike Lane Existing Paved Trail Downtown Core City of Federal Way h S 272nd 5T . 50 S 288th ST � 99 a s 312th ST' �. 9S3201hSTa N S a 5 336th 1. 1$ 0 S 348th ST a N Q S G 0 N Od c 5 g December 2015 Page - 24 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Future Conditions This section summarizes the transportation effects within the study area and at the City Center. It includes a summary of the land use assumed for the alternatives and roadway improvement assumptions. Future Year Land Use The Action Alternative proposes a mixed use development, which would provide the variety of land uses to create an urban center within Federal Way. The difference between the No Action and Action Alternatives is the land use assumptions in the City Center; the Action Alternative assumes an increase over the No Action alternative. Table 8 summarizes the land use quantities for the alternatives. The land use in the rest of the City and the greater Puget Sound Region is the same for both alternatives. Table 8. City Center Land Use Future No Action and Action Alternatives Retail (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Residential (units) Hotel (rooms) Existing 1,833,189 67,045 254 230 No Action 2,505,379 329,427 1,925 230 Action 2,308,189 467,045 2,654 830 Roadway Improvements Assumptions The city's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) highlights funded projects through the year 2040. Ten of the study intersections are expected to have funded planned projects between 2015 and 2025. Table 9 and Figure 11 summarize the projects assumed to be constructed by 2025 for both alternatives. Table 11 summarizes the specific improvements planned for study intersections. December 2015 Page - 25 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Table 9. Transportation Improvement Projects through 2025 Project Location Description A 10th Avenue SW @ SW Campus Drive Add SIB right -turn lane B SR 99 @ S 312th Street Add 2nd left -turn lane NB C S 304th Street @ 28th Avenue S Add NB right -turn lane, signal D SW 320th Street @ 21st Avenue SW Add 2nd WB left -turn lane, Interconnect to 26th Ave SW E S 312th Street @ 28th Avenue S Add SIB right -turn lane F SW 336th Way/SW 340th Street (26th PI SW to Hoyt Road SW) Widen to 5 lanes, add signal at 26th PI SW G SE 509 @ 11th Place S Add EB left -turn lane H S 356th Street (SR 99 to SR 161) Widen to 5 lanes I S 356th Street @ SR 161 Add 2nd NB left to SR 161 J S 320th Street @ 1 Avenue South Add EBL, WBL, WBR, NBT, SBR; widen to 5 lanes N to 316 or Alternative Measure K S 320th Street @ 1-5 Bridge Widening Add HOV lanes, realign ramps in SE quadrant L SW 344th Street (12th Avenue SW to 21st Avenue SW) Extend 3 lane principal collector M S 352nd Street (SR 99 to SR 161) Extend 3 lane principal collector N SR 99: S 340"' Street to S 356"' Street Construct Arterial HOV lanes, both directions 0 Military Rd @ S 342nd Street Add northbound left -turn lane at the intersection and a two way left turn lane between S. 340th Street and S. 342nd Street. P SR 99 @ S 34V1 Street Add 2nd southbound left turn lane Table 10. Changes to Study Intersection from TIP Intersection Im rovement Description SR 99 @ S 312th Street Add 2nd left -turn lane NB SW 320th Street @ 21st Avenue SW Add 2nd WB left -turn lane S 312th Street @ 28th Avenue S Add SIB right -turn lane SW 340th Street @ Hoyt Road SW Add WB lane, separate through and left lane. S 356th Street @ SR 161 Add 2nd NB left to SR 161 S 320th Street @ 1 Avenue South Restrict left turns on all approaches S 320th Street @ 1-5 SIB Add through lane on S 3201h Street both directions S 320th Street @ 1-5 NB Add through lane on S 3201h Street both directions SR 99 @ S 356m Street Add northbound through lane SR 99 @ S 348"' Street Add 2nd southbound left turn lane December 2015 Page - 26 i Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 11. Transportation Improvement Project Map PugetSound a� S ORTHSHORE PKI44 O d 33rd ST NE December 2015 00 o4 SW 320th ST 6xx .�f N SW IV61h ST esw 356th ST I S 272nd ST rpV e a 4t+ r 50 S 2661h ST O ° oS 312th ST a 03O5 32oth ST* �A 7� S a S 336th St * S 348th ST N Q 4 Q 44 4r, P 9 A q¢� Study Intersections TIP Project Intersections 61 AM & PM TIP Project Corridors * AM, PM & Saturday Downtown Core m PM City of Federal Way PM & Saturday Page - 27 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Trip Generation Trip generation rates for the alternatives were developed using a travel demand forecasting model and Fehr & Peers MainStreet tool. A travel demand forecasting model is a computer model developed to project traffic volumes and patterns based upon land use and the characteristics of the transportation system. The roadway network under study, as well as the land use that generates traffic on that network, is coded into the model. The model projects traffic on the roadway system based on observed traffic data and statistical data that associates typical travelers' tendencies with land use. A model of existing conditions is first created, and calibrated according to observed existing traffic volumes and patterns. Once a calibrated model is completed, it can be used to project the traffic volumes and patterns of future land use and transportation network scenarios. The traffic demand model for this study was created using EMME software. Separate Federal Way travel demand model runs were developed for the 2025 No Action and 2025 Action Alternatives to reflect how their land use assumptions would influence travel behavior in the future. The model assumed the same future roadway improvements for both alternatives. The MainStreet. tool was developed to more accurately predict trip generation in mixed use suburban centers such as Federal Way's City Center. MainStreet evaluates whether a reduction rate in new vehicle trips from the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual could be applied. This method supplements the travel demand model by recognizing how built environment variables including density, diversity of land uses, destinations (accessibility), development scale, pedestrian and bicycle design, distance to transit services, and demographics affect travel. Places with higher densities, a rich variety of land uses close to one another, and high quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit environments have lower vehicle trip generation rates. People have more choices in terms of both the travel mode as well as how far they must travel to reach various destinations. The level of vehicle trip reduction applied to the City Center districts varied among the two alternatives, based on the land uses assumed. This approach is consistent with best practices in transportation analysis, as documented by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (Report 684). Table 11 summarizes the trip generation for the two alternatives. Table 11. Trip Generation by Alternative Change from Land Use Type 2015 2025 No Action 2025 Action 2025 No Action Existing Alternative Alternative to Action _ Alternative Retail 1450 -28 1817 1789 Office 87 388 466 +78 AM Peak Hour Hotel 100 93 334 +241 Residential 88 742 1028 +286 Total 1,725 3,040 3,617 +577 Retail 4347 5542 4923 -619 Office 81 371 401 +30 PM Peak Hour Hotel 112 105 341 +236 Residential 105 901 1127 +226 Total 4,645 6,919 6,792 .127 December 2015 Page - 28 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Trip Generation Differences Explained The 2025 Action Alternative is anticipated to have more trips than the No Action Alternative in the AM peak hour (approximately 580 trips), but fewer trips (approximately 130 trips) in the PM peak hour. The increase in AM peak hour trips results from the increase in land use and lower number of trips occurring within the City Center. The decrease in PM peak hour trips is because more trips occur within the City Center area, which is referred to as the internal capture rate. It indicates that more people choose to walk, bike, or drive between land uses that are within the City Center. Trip Distribution and Assignment The trip distribution was based on the EMME Federal Way travel demand model; trip distribution provides an assessment of the number of people traveling to and from the site. The Saturday midday peak hour trip distribution was assumed to be the same as the PM peak hour trip distribution. The trip distribution was similar between the No Action and Action alternatives. Figure 12 summarizes the trip distribution for the Action Alternative PM peak hour. December 2015 Page - 29 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 12. Trip Distribution PugetSound �Qt 9 �3 x k�RrysHof� PgN1� w 33rd ST NE I _-\ ( I W 3Nth 57 1 Study Intersections Trip Distribution - PM Action / AM & PM < 1% AM, PM & Saturday - 1%- 3% / PM - 4%-6% / PM & Saturday - 7%- 9% ->9% S 3A8eh ST I Downtown Core City of Federal Way s 288th ST I December 2015 Page - 30 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Impacts This section summarizes the transportation effects within the study area. It describes the project's impact on traffic operations, safety, transit service, and pedestrian and bicycle mobility. Traffic Operations Impact Common to All Alternatives For the analysis, each of the signalized study intersections was analyzed using a 140 second cycle length in the PM peak hour and Saturday midday peak hour and a 120 second cycle length for the AM peak hour. This is consistent with the City of Federal Way's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses (September 9, 2014). No Action Alternative Table 12 and Figures 13 through 15 provide the operations analysis for the No Action Alternative. As summarized in Table 12, none of the intersections are anticipated to be deficient based on the City of Federal Way's traffic operations standards with programmed improvements. However, it is worth noting that some of the intersections exceed the level of service (LOS) standards defined by WSDOT and PSRC: ■ S 288 Street & Pacific Highway S • S 320 Street & Pacific Highway S • S 324 Street & Pacific Highway S • S 336 Street & Pacific Highway S • S 348 Street & Pacific Highway S • S 356 Street & Pacific Highway S • S 348 Street & SR 161 To correct the level of service (LOS) deficiencies at these locations, Federal Way and WSDOT could widen the roads and add capacity. These types of capacity additions were considered as part of the recent Comprehensive Plan Update, but were considered infeasible for the following reasons: Roadway expansion projects for drive alone vehicles were inconsistent with City Center Plan goals for a more walkable, accessible, and transit oriented community Extensive right of way impacts Longer traffic signal cycle lengths (because of wider roadways), which would make it more difficult for pedestrians and bicyclist to cross the street and potentially increase driver frustration with longer wait times at the signals. The objective of the Action Alternative is to create an urban form and development pattern that encourages less auto use and provides for a more walkable and bikeable environment. Therefore, the land use pattern and supporting transportation network investments for the City Center have been developed to reduce overall auto trip generation and driving compared to the No Action Alternative. As shown in the following section, the results of the traffic impact analysis support the notion that a higher density, transit supportive land use plan for City Center has fewer traffic operations impacts than the No Action Alternative during the PM peak hour. December 2015 Page - 31 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Table 12. 2025 No Action Alternatives Operations Analysis Study Intersection PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay vlc ratio LOS Delay vlc ratio LOS Delay vlc ratio *S 272 Street & Military Road S F 91.0 1.11 D 49.9 0.90 S 288 Street & Military Road S E 65.4 0.99 C 27.2 0.66 S 288 Street & Pacific Highway S F 124.4 1.01 F 112.4 0.94 **S 312 Street & 28 Avenue S E 47.1 0.97 C 18.3 0.74 S 320 Street & 1 Avenue S C 27.3 0.69 C 28.9 0.72 C 22.4 0.61 S 320 Street & 1-5 NB Ramp B 16.9 0.61 C 22.5 0.78 B 14.8 0.52 S 320 Street & 1-5 SB Ramp D 42.3 0.78 C 31.1 0.55 C 30.8 0.75 S 320 Street & Military Road S E 65.4 0.97 D 49.8 0.83 D 41.2 0.70 S 336 Street & Pacific Highway S E 59.0 1.06 D 42.3 0.73 C 28.7 0.63 S 348 Street & Pacific Highway S F 91.5 1.09 E 70.4 0.77 F 93.6 1.13 S 348 Street & SR 161 F 87.8 1.08 F 95.4 1.14 S 356 Street & 1 Avenue S E 76.7 1.09 S 356 Street & Enchanted Parkway S D 49.0 0.87 C 34.7 0.76 S 356 Street & Pacific Highway S E 67.8 1.07 E 69.8 0.61 D 52.7 0.87 SW 320 Street & 21 Avenue SW E 59.0 0.94 D 52.5 0.95 SW 336 Street & 21 Avenue SW E 64.4 0.96 SW 340 Street & Hoyt Road SW D 44.2 0.82 SW 356 Street & 21 Avenue SW F 85.4 0.96 SW Campus Drive & 1 Avenue S D 54.5 0.83 S 312 Street & Pacific Highway S D 51.4 0.86 D 39.1 0.72 D 36.4 0.74 S 316 Street & Pacific Highway S C 31.0 0.79 B 14.4 0.42 C 36.6 0.72 S 320 Street & 20 Avenue S C 32.7 0.81 B 19.2 0.46 D 36.5 0.80 S 320 Street & 23 Avenue S E 60.3 1.00 D 39.1 0.80 E 59.1 0.93 S 320 Street & Pacific Highway S E 61.7 0.94 E 55.2 0.80 E 63.7 0.94 S 324 Street & Pacific Highway S E 65.1 1.01 C 25.3 0.68 D 50.8 0.90 Average vlc City Center 0.91 0.68 0.85 * Intersection is located outside of City of Federal Way limits **Unsignalized Intersection December 2015 Page - 32 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 13. No Action Alternative VIC Ratio AM Peak Hour Puget Sound Q1 1010 4*91 T NORTySHORE PK` 4 33rd ST NE V/C Ratio - No Action AM < 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 F=' 051-0.75 • > 0.75 December 2015 at "° ,r N o W a . SW 320th Sr Q ei H SW 336th ST h S 272nd 5T . N 2 rpV t� V 6 ■ :�� S 288th ST S 312th ST . • N • � •� szum � C A a 5336th 4T49 y ■Ji S 346th ST . N a tw SW 356th Sr s� c. O A Downtown Core City of Federal Way Page - 33 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 14. No Action VIC Ratio PM Peak Hour Puget Sound aptvy O� �32 x NORrHSHORE PW N 33rd ST NE i. - y4 F V/C Ratio - No Action PM i < 0.25 0 0.25 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.75 > 0.75 . SW 328th ST 3 a SW jj6th ST OSW 356th ST Downtown Core City of Federal Way h S 272nd ST Y1 x M y o a ` S 288th ST tm 99 S 312th ST . r . ■ . 05 328th 5Tr N a S 336th ST S 348th ST a N a 9Z �O December 2015 Page - 34 I —1 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 15. No Action VIC Ratio Saturday Midday Peak Hour oQt99 Qt st v" s ORTHSHORE PKWq O NS R� Q i• N SW 320th ST fC, 3 a n SW 336th ST l S 272nd ST N x cv V 6 5 �2 S 20ath ST O S Mth ST 0 0. i5 320th STO N 5 a S 336th 5; S 34ath ST 33rd ST NE N � x SW 356th Sr O: Z m i F 4` MqQ,- E QQ . 9 y�0 O A q� V/C Ratio - No Action Saturday < 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.75 > 0.75 December 2015 Downtown Core City of Federal Way Page - 35 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Action Alternative Table 13 and Figures 16 through 18 provide the operations analysis for the Action Alternative. As shown, the Action Alternative does not degrade the LOS of any of the study intersections to be worse than the No Action Alternative. Overall, the level of intersection delay is less during the PM peak hour at all but three intersections for the Action Alternative. In these instances the delay increase is approximately three seconds and the LOS grade is unchanged. Based on these findings, the Action Alternative does not have a significant impact on traffic operations. Table 13.2025 Action Alternative Operations Analysis Study Intersection PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay vlc ratio LOS Delay vlc ratio LOS Delay vlc ratio *S 272 Street & Military Road S F 90.6 1.11 D 50.1 0.91 S 288 Street & Military Road S E 64.4 0.99 C 27.6 0.67 S 288 Street & Pacific Highway S F 121.3 1.00 F 121.2 0.96 **S 312 Street & 28 Avenue S E 47.4 0.97 C 18.7 0.72 S 320 Street & 1 Avenue S C 27.2 0.69 C 29.0 0.73 C 24.7 0.61 S 320 Street & 1-5 NB Ramp B 17.6 0.60 C 22.4 0.79 B 15.0 0.52 S 320 Street & 1-5 SB Ramp C 33.1 0.79 C 31.4 0.57 D 46.6 0.79 S 320 Street & Military Road S E 65.8 0.97 D 50.1 0.86 D 45.4 0.70 S 336 Street & Pacific Highway S E 57.4 1.03 D 45.3 0.75 C 31.4 0.62 S 348 Street & Pacific Highway S F 95.0 1.09 E 66.9 0.78 E 66.7 0.94 S 348 Street & SR 161 F 88.8 1.08 F 96.4 1.14 S 356 Street & 1 Avenue S E 77.1 1.10 S 356 Street & Enchanted Parkway S D 46.7 0.86 D 41.2 0.75 S 356 Street & Pacific Highway S E 66.7 1.06 E 62.7 0.60 D 52.5 0.87 SW 320 Street & 21 Avenue SW E 57.2 0.92 D 54.8 0.99 SW 336 Street & 21 Avenue SW E 64.3 0.96 SW 340 Street & Hoyt Road SW D 43.7 0.81 SW 356 Street & 21 Avenue SW F 83.5 0.95 SW Campus Drive & 1 Avenue S D 53.7 0.85 S 312 Street & Pacific Highway S D 53.5 0.88 D 38.5 0.75 D 48.2 0.76 S 316 Street & Pacific Highway S C 33.7 0.81 B 16.2 0.44 D 35.7 0.73 S 320 Street & 20 Avenue S C 32.1 0.82 C 22.1 0.48 D 36.4 0.81 S 320 Street & 23 Avenue S E 61.4 1.00 D 41.8 0.83 E 59.2 0.95 S 320 Street & Pacific Highway S E 60.5 0.95 E 60.8 0.83 E 59.0 0.93 S 324 Street & Pacific Highway S E 59.3 1.00 C 24.8 0.68 D 50.1 0.89 Average vlc City Center 0.92 0.70 0.86 intersection is located outside of Gity of Federal Way limits **Unsignalized Intersection December 2015 Page - 36 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 16. Action VIC Ratio AM Peak Hour Puget Sound aA AD N91 32 SW 320th ST N 2 i NO p � NSHORE PK`O � SW 3361h ST Q h S 272nd N 2 M y a 49 6 ! i� S 288th ST 99 . S 312th ST . . • v .5 320th 5 S 336M ST IS S 348th ST ' 33rd Si NE N � SW 356th Sr s� Vv Mq�'1F aQ 0 a WC Ratio - Action AM Downtown Core < 0.25 City of Federal Way 0.25 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.75 > 0.75 December 2015 Page - 37 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 17. Action VIC Ratio PM Peak Hour Puget Sound a� RD o� o a a SW 320th ST r, 3 N 2 Q O NORTySHORE PKW4 O ry v.� SWd61h ST H S 272nd S: ■ .� S 286th ST 0 S 312th ST . r • N r • ;:�5320eA5� Q n S 336th 5T— S 348th ST 33rd 5T NE Q RSW 3S6th ST v h� 2�0 0 4 a .py V/C Ratio - Action PM < 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.75 > 0.75 Downtown Core City of Federal Way December 2015 Page - 38 .-1 .1 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 18. Action VIC Ratio Saturday Midday Peak Hour h S 272nd -� h ? 1 V 11 Q Ye S 296th ST 2 ai P4 RQ� a 99 O�N91� Oy S 312E, ST S�P 3�s? SW 320th 5T . 05 3201h 5b 3 N N x x < 5 NORTySHORE POIN l7 ry yl� SW 336th ST S 336th xe In oa 9 _ S 346th ST N a r 33rd ST NE G F SW 356th 5T a N w M"P4y iy� q "k. 1 A of�y V/C Ratio - Action Saturday Downtown Core < 0.25 City of Federal Way 0.25 - 0.50 0.51 - 0.75 > 0.75 December 2015 Page - 39 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis The operations analysis shows that the Future No Action and Future Action result in very similar impact on the study intersections. Future Parking Requirements Common to All Alternatives As summarized in Table 14, both the No Action and Action Alternatives would require additional parking spaces per code requirements for new development (see Table 6). These increases assume full development of the City Center. Almost 15,000 parking spaces would be required to meet the proposed Action Alternative. The number of parking spaces represents the City's Parking Code requirements. Parking would be provided on a project -by -project basis in accordance with Federal Way Revised Code requirements. Table 14. Future Parking Requirements Retail Office Residential Hotel Total Parking (sq. ft.) (sq. ft.) (units) (rooms) Spaces per Code City Code Requirement 1 per 300 sq. ft. 2,308,189 1 per 300 sq. ft. 1.7 per unit 1 per room nla Action Land Use 467,045 2,654 830 Action Parking Spaces Needed 7,694 1,557 4,512 830 14,830 No Action Land use 2,505,379 329,427 1,925 230 No Action Parking Spaces 8,351 1,098 3,273 230 12,952 Needed Traffic Safety Impact Common to All Alternatives The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan identifies that congestion is a common contributing factor to vehicle collisions. As the amount of traffic increases increase within the area, the probability of traffic collisions would be expected to increase as well. Congestion is a primary factor in collision rates. However, The City and WSDOT have made investments in the study area in an on -going effort to reduce the number of preventable accidents that occur. It is anticipated that through these investments, the number of serious and preventable accidents would decrease. Both the Action and No Action Alternatives would increase the total vehicle volume of vehicles at the high collision locations identified in Table 4. Compared to the No Action Alternative, the Action Alternative would result in fewer added trips duringthe PM peak hour, the period of highest traffic congestion during a typical day. The Alternatives also make up only a small portion of the entering trips for the surrounding intersections. In addition, roadway improvements designed to reduce congestion may lower congestion associated collisions. December 2015 Page - 40 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Transit Service Impact Common to All Alternatives In the next ten years, demand for transit service in the City Center is expected to increase with the increase in jobs and households. Transit demand is to be addressed as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Figure 19 displays the future transit service network, including the proposed Light Rail alignment, anticipated to be opened in 2035. The City has identified SR 99 and S 320th Street along with 21st Avenue SW and 16 Avenue S as transit priority corridors. Action Alternative For this alternative the increase in households and office space compared to the No Action Alternative is anticipated to increase demand for transit service in the City Center. December 2015 Page - 41 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 19. Future Transit Network OFederal Way Transit Center ' Transit Stops Downtown Core Existing Transit Routes City of Federal Way Proposed Light Rail Stations' Study Intersections 000 Proposed Light Rail Route' ' Exact locations of stations and routes TBD December 2015 Page - 42 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Impact Common to All Alternatives The land use mix for the No Action and Action alternatives encourages walking and bicycling in and around the City Center. The City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan adopted in March 2012 highlights planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the City. All roads within the City Center either have an existing sidewalk or have been identified as a location for proposed sidewalks. Some roads around the City Center, including S 324th Street, S 3O8th Street, and 11th Place S, have been identified as locations for future bicycle facilities. The alternatives along with the proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities highlighted in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will increase safety and encourage walking and bicycling as a mode of transportation in and around the City Center. Figure 20 and Figure 21 display the planned pedestrian and bicycle future networks, respectively. December 2015 Page - 43 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Figure 20. Planned Pedestrian Network h S 272nd Pq�t . rr 16 ........ '9 ►:. SW 32ath ST ! - i.= •.; �• p • a HSHORE PICA �? • i i Slip 5T i 5 3351fi STa i / s�?eth sr N 33rd ST NE . r Is A Study Intersections 0 AM & PM / AM, PM & Saturday PM / PM & Saturday ----• Planned Sidewalk -•--• Planned Trail Downtown Core City of Federal Way 5 2Wth ST December 2015 Page - 44 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis 1 Figure 21. Planned Bicycle Network R h ; f _�""•5A72nd ST l • Puget Sound ; " ., .... ¢0 S 288th ST . i f • - � ' s 3$aur ar f i " �...� a .• Q •... ..+ u�m i i._...A......� ff • •�%'Os520thSTa �,..r,� �• � � i a -i .{ a j' . S f �� � r may. ..i ••.. } L l NO4�HSHORE PW N ' ! 54V�:ST i ` •tt f a ! i• Sa3361h 5T is Y � e d r S 3A8lh � _ _ 33rd ST NE . r -..;SW 356 rh ST • g i 1 ' .._..1�...-. ......... _.-...... f rStudy Intersections Planned Bicycle Facilities Downtown Core O AM & PM -• Paved Trail City of Federal Way G AM, PM & Saturday ----• Bike Lane PM ----• Bike Boulevard ig PM & Saturday ---•• Shared Lane Markings �� •---• Enhanced Shared Sidewalk December 2015 Page - 45 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Mitigation This section summarizes the proposed mitigation anticipated to be required beyond the roadway improvements assumed to be constructed by 2025. These projects are listed on the City Transportation Improvement Plan and Capital Improvement Program. Existing Roadway Network Both the No Action and Action Alternatives would increase the density and activity within the Federal Way City Center area. The increased density could increase traffic congestion; however, these increases may be offset by reduced vehicle travel demand resulting from mixed -use development, improvements to pedestrian facilities, and improved transit services. The Action Alternative results in a decrease in average vehicle delay at all study area intersections during the PM peak hour except for 3 intersections that experience an increase of approximately 3 seconds of average vehicle delay. For all intersections, the level of service (LOS) grade does not degrade between the No Action and Action Alternatives. Because the level of service grade does not change, the transportation impacts of the Action Alternatives are less than significant and no mitigation is proposed under this Transportation Impact Analysis. While there are no impacts and thus no mitigation required for the Action Alternatives, Federal Way, Sound Transit, and WSDOT are making and planning significant investments in the area's transportation network to increase the capacity of the transportation system. These projects include the following: • Interstate 5 - SR 161/SR18 Triangle Project: the reconstruction upgraded ramps and improved connections to and from 1-5, SR 18 and SR 161. The benefits of this project are increased travel capacity and safety improvements. ■ Pacific Highway (SR 99) Phase V High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane improvements, which widened the existing 5-lane roadway to a 7-lane section including center median, curb, sidewalk and streetlight. The project is planned for construction in 2016. a Federal Way Link Extension project with plans to extend light rail from Downtown Seattle to the Federal Way Transit Center. The City's Adopted Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, which proposes projects to add capacity for walking and bicycling and enhance accessibility in the area. These types of projects also reduce vehicle trip making by making it easier for people to park once and walk to multiple destinations. The City's ITS Plan, which when implemented, will provide better traffic signal coordination and operations, improved corridor management during incidents, and increased vehicle capacity. Parking Additional parking spaces will be required on site for both the No Action and Action Alternatives. These spaces may be provided on the site or as part of parking garages assumed as part of the Federal Way City Center development. The number of parking spaces required could be reduced through shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management programs. This reduction could vary from 10 percent to 20 percent based on the effectiveness and robustness of the programs implemented. December 2015 Page - 46 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Additional Mitigation The mitigation identified in this section is focused on additional improvements that could be required to meet the expected travel demand on area roadways associated with the proposed development in the project area. Development will need to meet the requirements of applicable codes at the time of application. Such requirements might include the dedication of right-of-way, installing curbs gutters and sidewalks, drainage improvements, and other requirements of the City. Additional mitigation may be required for individual development applications within the project area to reduce area traffic impacts or improve on -site circulation and to meet City and State requirements for Commute Trip Reduction and Transportation Demand Management. Actions to be considered include: On -site improvements - Driveway and circulation actions/improvements to minimize impact on area roadways. Actions may include management of access points, traffic control measures, construction of internal roadways, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, and connections to adjacent developments. Non -Motorized mode improvements - Mitigation may be required per site specific and land use development proposals to address pedestrian, bicycle, and transit improvements to support the plans, policies, and goals as noted within the City of Federal Way Transportation Element. Grid Roadway Development - Part of the City Center Plan is to develop a number of internal roadways to create smaller blocks that will improve the grid network and improve the access for pedestrians and vehicles. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements shall be a component of the development submittal phase of a proposed project within the project area. Roadways within the project area must meet specific "City Center" design standards as specified in the Transportation Element (Chapter 3) of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Right-of-way Dedication - Right-of-way dedication and frontage improvements may be required in conjunction with proposed developments. Roadways within the project area must meet specific "City Center" design standards as specified in the Transportation Element (Chapter 3) of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) - TDM actions can be used to reduce the impact of the project and as a mitigation action. These actions may include provision of transit passes to tenants and employees, ridesharing programs, priority carpool parking, and guaranteed ride home programs. TDM actions are designed to primarily address commute trips and may not be applicable as mitigation for all developments. The City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan summarizes TDM alternatives by their functional grouping and potential effectiveness, implementation difficulties, and expected cost effectiveness. These strategies include: Telecommuting, Parking Management and Pricing, Flexible Work Schedule, Rideshare programs, Traveler Information, Public Relations, and Marketing. The following are a list of recommended mitigation measures that can be considered in conjunction with individual development projects within the project area: 1. Encourage voluntary expansion of the CTR Program to employers of less than 100 employees. The encouragement by employers may be as diverse as subsidized bus passes, December 2015 Page - 47 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis car pool space priority, bike racks, shower facilities, van pools, car pool information access, telecommuting, variable work hours, etc. 2. Encourage the formation and expansion of area -wide ride -sharing programs. Such programs operate with little direct cost to the City and are highly cost effective. 3. Support the enhancement of Park and Ride facilities and transit centers to supplement the regional system, either directly through physical development or enhancements or indirectly through development conditions where employer vans are required to shuttle employees to Park and Ride facilities or transit centers. 4. Facilitate enhancements to the HOV system. This may include the dedication of property for HOV lanes, construction of arterial HOV lanes within existing City ROW, and priority treatments for buses at traffic signals. At the very least, where feasible, opportunities to enhance access to the State system of HOV lanes should be considered. 5. Achieve increased densities and mix of uses to support public transportation, decrease trip generation and parking impacts. 6. Encourage facilities (shelters, loading spaces, etc.) to accommodate City Center shuttle service in association with development projects, together with enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access and security. 7. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access to bus routes and transit centers. This can be a requirement of subdivision, development, and redevelopment. The City may need to acquire easements and construct trail connections. Development incentives could be granted for providing such amenities that are pedestrian, bike, and transit friendly. While bicycle, pedestrian, and bus transit services and facilities may be desirable for other reasons; they should not be looked on as highly cost-effective strategies to the exclusion of those actions listed above. Neighborhood Traffic Control - Development within the project area may be required to include actions to reduce the impact of cut through traffic on residential areas. Examples of neighborhood traffic control actions include: turn restrictions, speed controls, traffic enforcement, and parking restrictions. Parking - Mitigation actions that reduce the parking requirements within the project area should be encouraged. Examples include shared parking, employee parking programs, parking time restrictions, paid parking programs. Shared parking strategies focus on looking at opportunities where adjacent uses have parking demand profiles that can support the sharing of a smaller amount of parking spaces. For example, an office building with an 8 AM to 5 PM demand could share its parking with evening dominated uses such as restaurants, or a cinema. A parking demand study, which shows the hourly parking demand profiles for adjacent uses and the potential for joint parking opportunities within a mixed -use development, can be used to reduce the number of parking spaces. In addition, contained in the above TDM mitigation are strategies that overlap with parking mitigation plans for development. A development may propose a plan and management system to the City for approval upon submittal of the development permit. Those items may contain the following in support of the City of Federal Way and state Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) requirements: ALTERNATIVE MODE SUPPORT MEASURES Public education and promotion may increase the effectiveness of these other strategies up to 3%. December 2015 Page - 48 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Area -wide Ride matching Services - May result in a 0.1-3.6% reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and an up to 2.5% VMT reduction in transit services. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Vanpool Service - May result in an up to 8.3% in commute VMT, as well as a reduction in transit and vanpool fares up to 2.5%. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Non -Motorized Modes plan and implementation - May result in an up to 0-2% regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip - generation rates. HOV Facilities - May result in an up to 1.5% VMT reduction and 0.2% vehicle trip reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. On site development of Park and Ride program - May result in up to 0-0.5% VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. EMPLOYER -BASED TDM MEASURES Parking mitigation - Monetary incentives may result in an up to 8-18% trip reduction at site. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Alternative Work Schedules - May result in as much as a 1% regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip generation rates. Commute Support Programs - May result in up to 0.1-2.0% regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip generation rates. Parking Management - May result in up to a 20 to 30% reduction in SOV trips to/from the site. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Telecommuting - Up to 10% commute VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. OTHER STRATEGIES Parking Tax - May result in up to a 1 to 5% reduction in regional VMT and trip generation, but requires City Council and/or legislative action. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Development Parking Impact Mitigation - Requires Council approval to allow for payment of parking - mitigation funds towards long term investments in structured parking solutions in lieu of full parking requirement. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip - generation rates. Mixed Land Use/Jobs Housing Balance - May result in VMT reductions up to 10%. Parking stall credit is given based on overlapping shared usage of mixed facility, per City Code provisions. Transit -Oriented and Pedestrian -Friendly Design - Site and building design that encourages transit usage and/or walking may reduce overall parking requirement. Requires design review and staff approval. December 2015 Page - 49 Federal Way City Center I Transportation Impact Analysis Employment Center Density - Achievement of sufficient density within the City Center to constitute a regional employment center may reduce SOV work trips to individual development projects by up to 50%. Parking stall reductions may also apply to developments. Other Parking Management Plans - May mitigate 1 to 5% region -wide VMT, provided enforcement issues are addressed in the mitigation plan. December 2015 Page - 50 Appendix A Existing Geometries, Traffic Counts, and LOS Analysis Results HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S/Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 7/29/2015 4e f, t , Movement EBL EBT EBR W8L VVBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations tT tT aD +0 ttt Volume (vph) 248 284 39 31 107 41 3 36 540 9 30 334 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 3454 1729 3262 1759 5078 1755 5058 Fit Permitted 0.65 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1155 3454 832 3262 1759 5078 1755 5058 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 261 299 41 33 113 43 3 38 568 9 32 352 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 39 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 261 328 0 33 117 0 0 41 576 0 32 352 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 45 35 22 74 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 2 4 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 31.0 27.0 31.0 12.3 4.9 53.2 7.8 56.1 Effective Green, g (s) 29.0 26.0 29.0 11.3 4.9 53.2 7.8 56.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.24 0.26 0.10 0.04 0.48 0.07 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 389 816 243 335 78 2455 124 2579 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.09 0.00 0.04 c0.02 c0.11 c0.02 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.40 0.14 0.35 0.53 0.23 0.26 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 35.3 35.4 30.5 45.9 51.4 16.5 48.4 14.2 Progression Factor 0.80 0.78 0.98 0.99 1.04 0.34 0.88 0.87 Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.9 0.2 0.4 0.1 Delay (s) 31.8 27.7 30.1 45.9 56.2 5.8 43.2 12.5 Level of Service C C C D E A D B Approach Delay (s) 29.4 43.1 9.1 13.5 Approach LOS C D A B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S/Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 7/29/2015 4/ Movement SBR L+'onfiguralions r Volume (vph) 50 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1516 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1516 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 53 RTOR Reduction (vph) 18 Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% Bus Blockages E#/ho 4 Turn Type pm+ov Protected Phases 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 74.8 Effective Green, g (s) 72.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1003 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.03 Uniform Delay, dl 6.4 Progression Factor 0.27 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 Delay (s) 1.7 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intsr iqn 8.dmr sry 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 7/29/2015 ---* -0. ~ fl L* v. Movement E8L EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 1� T.i Zi +fT ab Volume (vph) 6 5 3 30 8 37 8 15 584 48 4 31 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1779 1749 1727 1605 1769 4995 1749 Fit Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 1357 1749 1368 1605 1769 4995 1749 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 091 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 5 3 33 9 41 9 16 642 53 4 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 38 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 7 5 0 33 12 0 0 25 690 0 0 38 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 17 17 7 12 9 9 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 3 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 2 3 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.2 7.0 13.8 9.8 6.0 76.2 4.8 Effective Green, g (s) 6.2 6.0 11.8 8.8 6.0 76.2 4.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.05 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.69 0.04 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 77 95 156 128 96 3460 76 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.00 c0.01 0.01 0.01 c0.14 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.02 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.05 0.21 0.10 0.26 0.20 0.50 Uniform Delay, d1 49.2 49.3 44.9 46.9 49.9 6.0 51.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 0.55 0.23 0.81 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.1 1.9 Delay (s) 49.4 49.4 45.0 59.6 27.7 1.5 43.3 Level of Service D D D E C A D Approach Delay (s) 49.4 53.8 2.4 Approach LOS D D A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.22 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 7/29/2015 i 4/ Movement SBT Si3R Lanelpanfigurations ++'* Volume (vph) 367 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5055 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5055 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 403 7 RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 409 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% Bus Blockaae_s _(#/hr) 2 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 75.0 Effective Green, g (s) 75.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3446 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.12 Uniform Delay, dl 6.1 Progression Factor 0.49 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 3.0 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 6.5 Approach LOS A Intersection 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 (j; 'f- 4- 4\ t /00. � Movement EBU EBL EST EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S8L Lane Configurations M ++T M ttt r P +TT Dil Volume (vph) 2 185 997 41 1 108 405 87 73 391 55 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3311 5266 3433 4887 1476 3377 4864 3406 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 3311 5266 3433 4887 1476 3377 4864 3406 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 201 1084 45 1 117 440 95 79 425 60 105 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 49 0 19 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 203 1126 0 0 118 440 46 79 466 0 105 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 4 7 7 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 9% 0% 8% 1% 2% 5% 8% 1% 3% 6% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 55.7 7.9 53.6 53.6 5.9 17.7 8.7 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 55.7 7.9 53.6 53.6 5.9 17.7 8.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.51 0.07 0.49 0.49 0.05 0.16 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 301 2666 246 2381 719 181 782 269 c0.06 c0.21 c0.03 0.09 0.02 c0.10 c0.03 0.03 0.67 0.42 0.48 0.18 0.06 0.44 0.60 0.39 48.4 17.0 49.1 15.9 14.9 50.4 42.8 48.1 0.76 0.59 0.92 0.60 1.00 1.37 0.86 0.77 3.9 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.3 40.8 10.5 45.6 9.7 15.1 69.9 37.5 37.6 D B D A B E D D 15.1 16.9 42.1 B B D 23.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C 0.47 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 70.1% ICU Level of Service C 15 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR Larg"�onfgurations +++ iW Volume (vph) 229 71 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 0.98 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4989 1399 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4989 1399 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 249 77 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 63 Lane Group Flow (vph) 249 14 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 11% Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 8 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.5 20.5 Effective Green, g (s) 20.5 20.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 929 260 vls Ratio Prot 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.06 Uniform Delay, dl 38.3 36.8 Progression Factor 0.74 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 28.3 36.8 Level of Service C D Approach Delay (s) 32.1 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SSL SBT Lane Configurations M +0 M to T T3. Volume (vph) 37 1073 17 11 8 599 42 8 4 2 37 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.90 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3554 5172 3333 4825 1679 1814 1639 1655 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.75 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3554 5172 3333 4825 1386 1814 1300 1655 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 39 1129 18 12 8 631 44 8 4 2 39 11 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 19 Lane Group Flow (vph) 39 1146 0 0 20 671 0 8 4 0 39 13 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1 % 0% 2% 7% 5% 0% 6% 0% 0% 10% 0% Bus Blockages #/hr 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.7 77.1 4.0 77.4 6.6 5.6 13.2 8.9 Effective Green, g (s) 3.7 77.1 4.0 77.4 5.6 5.1 12.2 8.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.70 0.04 0.70 0.05 0.05 0.11 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 119 3625 121 3395 71 84 155 126 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.22 0.01 c0.14 0.00 0.00 c0.01 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.02 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.32 0.17 0.20 0.11 0.05 0.25 0.10 Uniform Delay, dl 51.9 6.3 51.4 5.6 49.8 50.1 44.8 47.3 Progression Factor 0.86 0.77 0.80 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.10 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 Delay (s) 45.3 5.1 41.5 3.5 50.1 50.2 47.8 52.1 Level of Service D A D A D D D D Approach Delay (s) 6.4 4.6 50.1 49.7 Approach LOS A A D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 7.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.32 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lan4onfigurations Volume (vph) 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% Bus Blockages #/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS intersection 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations v tt'k )) tO ' t r 1� Volume (vph) 99 885 22 131 707 149 14 88 105 297 86 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3148 4948 3483 4995 1767 1361 1537 3392 1545 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 3148 4948 3483 4995 1767 1361 1537 3392 1545 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Adj. Flow (vph) 115 1029 26 152 822 173 16 102 122 345 100 63 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 25 0 0 0 90 0 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 1053 0 152 970 0 16 102 32 345 141 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 1 2 1 4 4 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 1 % 0% 1 % 3% 2% 0% 30% 1 % 2% 11 % 10% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 4 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 51.3 8.7 50.0 2.6 14.1 22.8 16.9 28.4 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 51.3 8.7 50.0 2.1 13.6 22.8 16.4 27.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.47 0.08 0.45 0.02 0.12 0.21 0.15 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 286 2307 275 2270 33 168 318 505 391 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 cO.21 c0.04 0.19 0.01 c0.07 0.01 c0.10 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.46 0.55 0.43 0.48 0.61 0.10 0.68 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 47.2 19.9 48.8 20.3 53.4 45.7 35.3 44.3 33.7 Progression Factor 0.77 0.48 1.37 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.05 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.6 1.1 0.5 4.0 4.2 0.1 3.0 0.2 Delay (s) 36.4 10.2 68.1 19.7 57.5 49.9 35.3 47.8 35.6 Level of Service D B E B E D D D D Approach Delay (s) 12.8 26.2 43.0 43.9 Approach LOS B C D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 25.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 7/29/2015 --1'4- 4--it 4\ * I L4 �► Movement EBL EER. WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t it T A TTt Zi Volume (vph) 18 65 24 80 44 6 26 43 525 117 1 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1564 1760 1494 3217 1671 1751 4832 1684 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1564 1760 1494 3217 1671 1751 4832 1684 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 77 29 95 52 7 31 51 625 139 1 12 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 26 0 5 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 77 3 95 54 0 0 82 743 0 0 13 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 3 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 16% 5% 6% 7% 8% 25% 1 % 3% 4% 4% 1 % 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 6 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.0 10.5 10.5 9.3 16.8 8.3 67.2 4.0 Effective Green, g (s) 2.5 10.0 10.0 8.8 16.3 8.3 67.2 4.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.15 0.08 0.61 0.04 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 35 160 135 257 247 132 2951 61 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.04 c0.03 0.03 c0.05 c0.15 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.48 0.02 0.37 0.22 0.62 0.25 0.21 Uniform Delay, dl 53.3 47.5 45.5 48.0 41.2 49.3 9.8 51.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.98 0.79 Incremental Delay, d2 17.1 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 6.3 0.2 0.6 Delay (s) 70.3 48.4 45.6 48.3 41.4 46.1 9.9 41.3 Level of Service E D D D D D A D Approach Delay (s) 51.4 45.7 13.4 Approach LOS D D B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.32 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 7/29/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lane�V,orfgurations Tt'+ Volume (vph) 347 28 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4897 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4897 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 413 33 RTOR Reduction (vph) 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 440 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 0% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 62.9 Effective Green, g (s) 62.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2800 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.16 Uniform Delay, dl 11.1 Progression Factor 0.65 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 7.3 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 8.3 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St 7/29/2015 ---* -0. -V I # 4/ Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r Vi tT+ t r 1� Volume (vph) 80 399 225 78 438 5 224 153 82 62 154 104 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3578 1489 1770 3502 3406 1855 1501 1782 1745 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 1789 3578 1489 1770 3502 3406 1855 1501 1782 1745 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 416 234 81 456 5 233 159 85 65 160 108 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 126 0 1 0 0 0 66 0 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 83 416 108 81 460 0 233 159 19 65 246 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 0 0 4 1 4 1 2 2 0 4 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.9 56.6 56.6 8.7 48.4 12.5 27.0 27.0 7.7 22.2 Effective Green, g (s) 16.9 56.6 55.6 8.7 48.4 12.5 27.0 27.0 7.7 22.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.47 0.46 0.07 0.40 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 1687 _ 689 128 1412 _ 354 417 337 114 322 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.12 c0.05 c0.13 c0.07 c0.09 0.04 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.25 0.16 0.63 0.33 0.66 0.38 0.06 0.57 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 46.5 19.0 18.6 54.1 24.6 51.7 39.4 36.5 54.5 46.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 0.5 7.3 0.6 3.4 0.2 0.0 4.2 9.3 Delay (s) 46.7 19.3 19.1 61.4 25.2 55.0 39.6 36.5 58.8 55.7 Level of Service D B B E C E D D E E Approach Delay (s) 22.4 30.6 46.6 56.3 Approach LOS C C D E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: S Peasley C n Rd 8l5/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + + r Volume (vph) 284 374 381 513 645 222 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 1129 1863 1863 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 284 374 381 513 645 222 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 64 0 0 0 133 Lane Group Flow (vph) 284 310 381 513 645 89 Turn Type Prot Perm Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.2 9.2 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 Effective Green, g (s) 9.2 9.2 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 986 455 451 745 745 633 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.28 c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm c0.20 0.34 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.68 0.84 0.69 0.87 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 8.9 10.1 8.7 7.9 8.8 6.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 3.3 17.4 5.2 12.9 0.5 Delay (s) 8.9 13.4 26.1 13.1 21.7 6.6 Level of Service A B C B C A Approach Delay (s) 11.5 18.6 17.8 Approach LOS B B B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 32.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 SYS 320 St 7/29/2015 10. "V f- � -N Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WST WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi 0 0 t if '� +g, Volume (vph) 76 857 79 173 744 120 81 218 227 110 187 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1742 3408 1778 3409 1738 1891 1557 1748 3400 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.44 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 3408 1778 3409 812 1891 1557 492 3400 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 78 884 81 178 767 124 84 225 234 113 193 71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 7 0 0 0 68 0 29 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 961 0 178 884 0 84 225 166 113 235 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 5 1 8 5 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages Whir) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 71.2 18.3 74.5 30.7 21.0 39.3 30.3 20.8 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 71.2 18.3 74.5 30.7 21.0 39.3 30.3 20.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.51 0.13 0.53 0.22 0.15 0.28 0.22 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 186 1733 232 1814 242 283 492 191 505 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.28 c0.10 0.26 0.02 c0.12 0.04 c0.04 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.06 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.55 0.77 0.49 0.35 0.80 0.34 0.59 0.47 Uniform Delay, dl 58.4 23.5 58.8 20.7 44.9 57.4 40.0 46.5 54.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.79 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 1.3 11.5 0.8 0.3 13.4 0.1 3.2 0.2 Delay (s) 59.0 24.8 58.1 16.4 45.3 70.8 40.2 49.7 54.8 Level of Service E C E B D E D D D Approach Delay (s) 27.4 23.3 53.6 53.3 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 33.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 305T 1-5 SB Ramp/ 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St/S 320 St II 8/6/2015 --io. *-- t t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI_ SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt *i tt 4 W Volume (vph) 0 1381 465 149 1197 0 0 0 0 136 0 720 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3507 1484 1741 3525 1651 1664 3378 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3507 1484 217 3525 1651 1664 3378 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1439 484 155 1247 0 0 0 0 142 0 750 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 189 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1439 325 155 1247 0 0 0 0 71 71 561 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 5 8 Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 2 4 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Perm D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 89.1 89.1 97.6 102.6 27.4 27.4 27.4 Effective Green, g (s) 89.1 89.1 97.6 102.6 27.4 27.4 27.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.70 0.73 0.20 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2231 944 243 2583 323 325 661 v/s Ratio Prot c0.41 c0.04 0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.41 0.04 0.04 c0.17 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.34 0.64 0.48 0.22 0.22 0.85 Uniform Delay, dill 15.7 11.9 13.8 7.7 47.3 47.3 54.3 Progression Factor 0.40 0.02 1.31 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.9 3.5 0.6 0.1 0.1 9.5 Delay (s) 7.6 1.1 21.6 6.7 47.4 47.4 63.8 Level of Service A A C A D D E Approach Delay (s) 6.0 8.3 0.0 61.2 Approach LOS A A A E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: All Traffic Data Services-1114/04 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps/1-5 NB Ramp & S 320 St 1I7/29/2015 -11 --1. 'e, 4--- *-- t t I/ Movement EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBt_ NBT NBR S8L SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r tT 41� Volume (vph) 0 817 674 0 869 129 464 2 99 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 2% 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 3473 1560 3493 1635 1582 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 Satd. Flow(perm) 3473 1560 3493 1635 1582 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 878 725 0 934 139 499 2 106 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 878 725 0 1066 0 309 283 0 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (Nhr) 2 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Split NA Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free Actuated Green, G (s) 99.7 140.0 99.7 30.3 30.3 Effective Green, g (s) 99.7 140.0 99.7 30.3 30.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 1.00 0.71 0.22 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2473 1560 2487 353 342 vls Ratio Prot 0.25 0.31 c0.19 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm c0.46 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.46 0.43 0.88 0.83 Uniform Delay, dl 7.8 0.0 8.3 53.0 52.4 Progression Factor 0.15 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.9 0.5 20.2 14.4 Delay (s) 1.5 0.9 3.3 73.2 66.8 Level of Service A A A E E Approach Delay (s) 1.2 3.3 70.0 0.0 Approach LOS A A E A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 14.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 SYS Peasle C n Rd 7/2912015 Movement EBL --* EBT EBR Ir VV9L 4-- WBT WBR NBL t NBT /W WW " JML i SBT 4/ SBR Lane Configurations Vi tI ti t r Vi T it Volume (vph) 139 647 180 62 617 108 219 65 52 143 122 180 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3349 1770 3404 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3349 1770 3404 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 153 711 198 68 678 119 241 71 57 157 134 198 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 8 0 0 0 47 0 0 174 Lane Group Flow (vph) 153 898 0 68 789 0 241 71 10 157 134 24 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #Ihr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 70.7 8.6 52.3 23.6 23.6 23.6 17.1 17.1 17.1 Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 70.7 8.6 52.3 23.6 23.6 23.6 17.1 17.1 17.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.51 0.06 0.37 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 341 1691 108 1271 295 314 253 214 227 183 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.27 0.04 c0.23 c0.14 0.04 c0.09 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.53 0.63 0.62 0.82 0.23 0.04 0.73 0.59 0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 49.9 23.4 64.1 35.8 56.1 50.3 48.7 59.3 58.1 54.8 Progression Factor 1.38 1.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 1.1 8.0 2.3 15.1 0.1 0.0 10.6 2.7 0.1 Delay (s) 69.1 39.3 72.1 38.0 71.3 50.4 48.7 69.9 60.9 54.9 Level of Service E D E D E D D E E D Approach Delay (s) 43.6 40.7 63.8 61.4 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 7/29/2015 *-- it I L4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t r tT. 9) tO A Volume (vph) 162 85 156 81 110 57 2 144 1211 87 5 46 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1699 1853 1499 1715 3287 3368 4893 1796 Fit Permitted 0.59 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow perm 1051 1853 1499 1171 3287 3368 4893 1796 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 167 88 161 84 113 59 2 148 1248 90 5 47 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 141 0 52 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 88 20 84 120 0 0 150 1334 0 0 52 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 16 14 18 5 16 14 9 18 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 4 4 2 6 4 2 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.8 17.7 17.7 25.8 17.3 10.5 86.2 8.0 Effective Green, g (s) 25.8 17.7 17.7 25.8 17.3 10.5 86.2 8.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.13 0.13 0.18 0.12 0.08 0.62 0.06 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 233 234 189 247 406 252 3012 102 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 0.05 0.02 0.04 c0.04 c0.27 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm c0.09 0.01 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.38 0.11 0.34 0.30 0.60 0.44 0.51 Uniform Delay, dl 54.6 56.1 54.2 51.0 55.8 62.7 14.2 64.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.96 0.69 Incremental Delay, d2 8.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.1 2.5 0.5 1.4 Delay (s) 63.0 56.5 54.2 51.3 56.0 64.8 14.1 45.7 Level of Service E E D D E E B D Approach Delay (s) 58.2 54.4 19.3 Approach LOS E D B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 21.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwv S & S 336 St 7/29/2015 i 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lane�arfigurations +++ IN Volume (vph) 1154 158 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5134 1507 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5134 1507 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 1190 163 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 56 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1190 107 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 2 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 83.7 92.2 Effective Green, g (s) 83.7 92.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.66 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3069 992 v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.11 Uniform Delay, d1 14.7 8.8 Progression Factor 0.43 0.13 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 Delay (s) 6.7 1.1 Level of Service A A Approach Delay (s) 7.5 Approach LOS A Intersection 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 7/29/2015 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR VVBL VVBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations A +T# TT M tT r Vi Volume (vph) 16 127 1134 119 470 868 67 6 181 431 426 147 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 1% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1720 3412 3337 3397 3352 3456 1530 1796 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1720 3412 3337 3397 3352 3456 1530 1796 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 17 134 1194 125 495 914 71 6 191 454 448 155 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 61 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 151 1314 0 495 981 0 0 197 454 387 155 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 8 7 9 10 2 7 9 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot _2 NA Prot Prot NA pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 3 1 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 70.9 19.0 70.9 13.8 25.6 44.6 14.5 Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 70.9 19.0 70.9 13.8 25.6 44.6 14.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.47 0.13 0.47 0.09 0.17 0.30 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1612 422 1605 308 589 505 173 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.39 c0.15 0.29 0.06 0.13 c0.10 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.82 1.17 0.61 0.64 0.77 0.77 0.90 Uniform Delay, dl 62.7 33.9 65.5 29.3 65.7 59.4 48.0 67.0 Progression Factor 0.80 0.66 1.28 0.24 0.86 0.84 1.33 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.0 3.7 91.6 1.0 2.9 5.1 5.6 39.1 Delay (s) 56.0 26.2 175.7 8.0 59.3 54.9 69.4 106.1 Level of Service E C F A E D E F Approach Delay (s) 29.3 64.1 61.6 Approach LOS C E E Iizt�r-sa,NM Sumrn�r HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 7/29/2015 4 4/ Movement SBT SBR LaneVonfigurations tt r Volume (vph) 467 169 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 0.97 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (Prot) 3578 1552 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3578 1552 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 492 178 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 120 Lane Group Flow (vph) 492 58 Confl. Peds, (#Ihr) 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 2 2 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.3 26.3 Effective Green, g (s) 26.3 26.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 627 272 vls Ratio Prot c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.21 Uniform Delay, d1 59.1 53.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.9 0.1 Delay (s) 65.1 53.1 Level of Service E D Approach Delay (s) 70.2 Approach LOS E Intersection Sumrnary 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkwy S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBT Ei3R WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SST Lane Configurations tt W ft r tT r ' tT Volume (vph) 171 1255 282 782 992 378 95 302 640 646 283 618 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -4% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1704 3436 1476 5027 3561 1535 3419 3203 1441 3502 3509 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1704 3436 1476 5027 3561 1535 3419 3203 1441 3502 3509 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 180 1321 297 823 1044 398 100 318 674 680 298 651 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 83 0 0 190 0 0 26 46 0 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 180 1321 214 823 1044 208 0 418 913 369 298 735 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 26 15 13 13 2 15 13 24 Heavy Vehicles(%) 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 23 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 49.7 49.7 25.0 55.7 55.7 19.7 40.1 70.1 15.2 35.6 Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 49.7 49.7 25.0 55.7 55.7 19.7 40.1 70.1 15.2 35.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.33 0.33 0.17 0.37 0.37 0.13 0.27 0.47 0.10 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 1138 489 837 1322 569 449 856 673 354 832 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.38 c0.16 0.29 0.12 c0.29 0.26 0.09 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.84 1.16 0.44 0.98 0.79 0.37 0.93 1.07 0.55 0.84 0.88 Uniform Delay, dl 64.0 50.1 39.2 62.3 41.9 34.3 64.5 54.9 28.6 66.2 55.2 Progression Factor 0.92 0.85 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.14 1.19 0.89 0.91 Incremental Delay, d2 13.3 77.9 1.5 23.5 3.9 1.4 22.6 47.7 0.4 13.1 8.9 Delay (s) 71.9 120.7 37.2 85.8 45.8 35.7 94.9 110.6 34.5 72.2 59.2 Level of Service E F D F D D F F C E E Approach Delay (s) 102.0 58.6 89.1 62.9 Approach LOS F E F E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 78.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 7/29/2015 4/ M^v.ement SBR Lawonfgurations Volume (vph) 87 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Said. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Said. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 26 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summa 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 7/29/2015 --* _10. -,* 'fl 4\ \*� Movement EBL EBT EBR INBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M t r tt r M +T+ tt Volume (vph) 317 310 168 189 360 69 1 105 501 61 41 721 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3436 1872 1579 1799 3628 1588 3333 3362 1753 3492 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3436 1872 1579 1799 3628 1588 826 3362 1753 3492 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph) 364 356 193 217 414 79 1 121 576 70 47 829 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 149 0 0 61 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 364 356 44 217 414 18 0 122 641 0 47 829 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm custom Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 5 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.0 34.3 34.3 20.0 34.3 34.3 16.0 61.1 13.6 58.7 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 34.3 34.3 20.0 34.3 33.3 17.0 62.1 13.6 58.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.23 0.22 0.11 0.41 0.09 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 458 428 361 239 829 352 93 1391 158 1366 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.19 c0.12 0.11 0.19 0.03 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.01 c0.15 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.83 0.12 0.91 0.50 0.05 1.31 0.46 0.30 0.61 Uniform Delay, dl 63.0 55.1 45.9 64.1 50.4 45.9 66.5 31.8 63.7 36.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.66 Incremental Delay, d2 8.6 12.4 0.1 33.4 0.2 0.0 198.0 1.1 0.2 0.8 Delay (s) 71.6 67.5 46.0 84.7 52.1 45.9 264.5 32.9 51.9 24.7 Level of Service E E D F D D F C D C Approach Delay (s) 64.6 61.4 69.7 26.8 Approach LOS E E E C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 7/29/2015 Movement SBR La: anfigurations r Volume (vph) 188 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Fit 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1568 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1568 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph) 216 RTOR Reduction (vph) 131 Lane Group Flow (vph) 85 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 _ Turn Type Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 58.7 Effective Green, g (s) 58.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 613 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.14 Uniform Delay, dl 29.4 Progression Factor 0.99 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s) 29.2 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5251: Enchanted Pkwy S & S 356 St II 8/5/2015 -40. --t i- ~ 4'-* t41 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r I 1� 0 tt Volume (vph) 247 13 159 13 12 7 318 962 29 11 810 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1782 1540 1734 1753 1778 3519 1744 3473 Fit Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (Perm)_1345 1540 971 1753 1778 3519 1744 3473 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.86 0.86 fl.86 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 266 14 171 15 14 8 331 1002 30 11 827 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 138 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 280 33 15 16 0 331 1031 0 11 827 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 3 9 7 3 9 7 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 34.9 27.8 26.8 26.8 29.3 89.5 2.6 59.8 Effective Green, g (s) 36.9 28.8 28.8 28.8 31.3 90.5 2.6 61.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.60 0.02 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 7.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 354 295 186 336 _ _ 371 2123 30 1430 vls Ratio Prot c0.04 0.01 c0.19 0.29 0.01 c0.24 vls Ratio Perm c0.15 0.02 0.02 vlc Ratio 0.79 0.11 0.08 0.05 0.89 0.49 0.37 0.58 Uniform Delay, dl 52.9 50.0 49.7 49.4 57.7 16.7 72.9 34.0 Progression Factor 0.20 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 22.1 0.8 2.8 1.7 Delay (s) 19.6 7.4 49.8 49.4 79.8 17.5 75.6 35.8 Level of Service B A D D E B E D Approach Delay (s) 15.0 49.6 32.6 36.3 Approach LOS B D C D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S/Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 7/29/2015 --* --I, -t f- ~ #1 4\ I! 1* Movement EBL EST EBR WBL r,, T fllBE `dBU NBL N E-T N B R SBU SBL Lane Configurations +T Ti+ +fl Volume (vph) 231 327 135 125 246 107 30 169 778 74 2 114 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1721 3318 1736 3210 1759 4994 1755 Fit Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 454 3318 450 3210 1759 4994 1755 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 233 330 136 126 248 108 30 171 786 75 2 115 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 36 0 0 38 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 233 430 0 126 318 0 0 201 855 0 0 117 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 45 35 22 74 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 6 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 38.2 27.3 38.2 18.3 20.2 70.2 13.6 Effective Green, g (s) 36.2 26.3 36.2 17.3 20.2 70.2 13.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.19 0.26 0.12 0.14 0.50 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 288 623 207 396 253 2504 170 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.13 0.04 0.10 c0.11 0.17 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.69 0.61 0.80 0.79 0.34 0.69 Uniform Delay, dl 44.9 53.1 42.2 59.7 57.9 21.0 61.1 Progression Factor 1.26 1.23 0.98 0.97 1.12 0.89 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.0 2.6 3.4 10.5 13.7 0.3 8.9 Delay (s) 70.3 67.6 44.5 68.2 78.3 19.1 70.0 Level of Service E E D E E B E Approach Delay (s) 68.5 62.0 30.3 Approach LOS E E C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S/Pacific Hw_v S & S 312 St 7/29/2015 Movement SBT SBR LaneZT,onfiaurations +ft r Volume (vph) 873 124 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (Prot) 5058 1508 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5058 1508 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 882 125 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 52 Lane Group Flow (vph) 882 73 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 63.6 83.5 Effective Green, g (s) 63.6 81.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.58 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2297 877 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.08 Uniform Delay, dl 25.3 12.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.0 Delay (s) 25.7 12.9 Level of Service C B Approach Delay (s) 28.9 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S/ Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 7/29/2015 --I. -V Ir -*- 4 fl t L Movement E8L EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU 58L Lane Configurations 1 T aZi ft Zi Volume (vph) 98 66 122 94 71 102 45 208 962 107 8 108 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1740 1601 1736 1629 1769 4861 1737 Fit Permitted 0.30 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 545 1601 483 1629 1769 4861 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 100 67 124 96 72 104 46 212 982 109 8 110 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 52 0 0 45 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 139 0 96 131 0 0 258 1084 0 0 118 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 21 12 33 37 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.5 17.5 24.5 16.7 23.8 75.7 21.8 Effective Green, g (s) 22.5 16.5 22.5 15.7 23.8 75.7 21.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.12 0.16 0.11 0.17 0.54 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 145 188 131 182 300 2628 270 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.09 0.03 c0.08 c0.15 0.22 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.74 0.73 0.72 0.86 0.41 0.44 Uniform Delay, dl 53.0 59.7 61.4 60.0 56.5 19.0 53.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.76 0.97 0.85 0.95 Incremental Delay, d2 10.4 12.3 15.2 9.8 16.0 0.4 0.4 Delay (s) 63.4 71.9 65.7 55.5 70.6 16.6 51.4 Level of Service E E E E E B D Approach Delay (s) 69.0 59.1 26.9 Approach LOS E E C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S/ Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 7/29/2015 4 Movement SBT SBR Lane�,Ponfigurations tt'4 Volume (vph) 1069 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (Prot) 5046 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 1091 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1142 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 17 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 73.7 Effective Green, g (s) 73.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2656 v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.43 Uniform Delay, dl 20.3 Progression Factor 0.54 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 Delay (s) 11.4 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 15.2 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 --,, -V r fl t Movement ESU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL VVBT VVBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations M ttt M ttt r A) W4 Volume (vph) 10 337 940 143 1 360 717 280 13 220 779 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3571 5126 3467 5081 1514 3377 4887 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3571 5126 3467 5081 1514 3377 4887 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 10 351 979 149 1 375 747 292 14 229 811 198 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 164 0 0 30 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 361 1114 0 0 376 747 128 0 243 979 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 27 38 27 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 3 8 5 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.3 45.1 21.0 48.8 48.8 14.0 36.2 Effective Green, g (s) 17.3 45.1 21.0 48.8 48.8 14.0 36.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.32 0.15 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 441 1651 520 1771 527 337 1263 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 c0.22 c0.11 0.15 0.07 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.68 0.72 0.42 0.24 0.72 0.77 Uniform Delay, dl 59.8 41.1 56.7 34.8 32.5 61.1 48.1 Progression Factor 0.84 1.22 0.64 0.43 0.26 1.25 0.58 Incremental Delay, d2 6.9 1.4 3.3 0.6 0.9 5.1 2.2 Delay (s) 57.0 51.4 39.9 15.6 9.3 81.5 30.1 Level of Service E D D B A F C Approach Delay (s) 52.8 20.8 40.1 Approach LOS D C D Intersection SummaFy HCM 2000 Control Delay 37.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 L-4\10- 4 4/ Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M ttt r Volume (vph) 24 317 695 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.93 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3474 5187 1457 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3474 5187 1457 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 25 330 724 198 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 142 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 355 724 56 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 38 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages Whr) 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.7 39.9 39.9 Effective Green, g (s) 17.7 39.9 39.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 439 1478 415 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.49 0.14 Uniform Delay, dl 59.5 41.6 37.2 Progression Factor 0.72 0.60 0.89 Incremental Delay, d2 9.1 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 52.3 25.2 33.4 Level of Service D C C Approach Delay (s) 34.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 -. Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR VVBL �,%-ET WBR NPL NBT NBR SSL SBT Lane Configurations bi +0 )Vi W-1 + r 1� Volume (vph) 6 147 1163 23 300 1316 174 37 121 241 348 154 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3209 4841 3483 5111 1733 1735 1498 3327 1574 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3209 4841 3483 5111 1733 1735 1498 3327 1574 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 156 1237 24 319 1400 185 39 129 256 370 164 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 0 65 0 20 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 162 1260 0 319 1575 0 39 129 191 370 255 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 69 20 27 Heavy Vehicles(%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.6 62.5 21.0 72.9 8.2 18.5 39.5 19.0 29.3 Effective Green, g (s) 10.6 62.5 21.0 72.9 7.7 18.0 39.5 18.5 28.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.45 0.15 0.52 0.06 0.13 0.28 0.13 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 242 2161 522 2661 95 223 422 439 323 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.26 0.09 c0.31 0.02 c0.07 0.07 0.11 c0.16 vls Ratio Perm 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.58 0.61 0.59 0.41 0.58 0.45 0.84 0.79 Uniform Delay, d1 63.0 29.0 55.7 23.2 64.0 57.4 41.4 59.3 52.7 Progression Factor 1.13 0.53 0.85 0.60 1.02 1.00 0.95 0.94 0.87 Incremental Delay, d2 4.9 1.1 1.2 0.8 1.0 2.2 0.3 11.2 9.5 Delay (s) 75.8 16.5 48.4 14.9 66.1 59.5 39.4 66.7 55.2 Level of Service E B D B E E D E E Approach Delay (s) 23.3 20.5 48.0 61.8 Approach LOS C C D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 IWA Movement SBR Lan4onfigurations Volume (vph) 104 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 111 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 62 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 7/29/2015 --1.f- 4---fl I ♦ 1* {i4hve►n nl EBL EBT EBR 'T L VVBT VVBR NBU W1 NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t 1� A tO Volume (vph) 96 153 174 302 155 43 83 159 1110 191 5 123 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1504 3375 1768 1773 4971 1713 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1812 1504 3375 1768 1773 4971 1713 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 102 163 185 321 165 46 88 169 1181 203 5 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 114 0 8 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 102 163 71 321 203 0 0 257 1370 0 0 136 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 12 13 10 8 12 13 5 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages #Ihr) 0 8 6 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.3 17.2 17.2 17.6 22.5 18.0 61.2 25.0 Effective Green, g (s) 11.8 16.7 16.7 17.1 22.0 18.0 61.2 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.13 0.44 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 149 216 179 412 277 227 2173 305 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.09 0.10 c0.12 c0.14 c0.28 0.08 vls Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.75 0.40 0.78 0.73 1.13 0.63 0.45 Uniform Delay, dl 62.3 59.7 57.0 59.6 56.2 61.0 30.6 51.3 Progression Factor 0.89 0.87 0.63 0.81 0.79 0.81 0.69 0.59 Incremental Delay, d2 9.8 12.3 0.5 8.2 8.4 96.1 1.2 0.3 Delay (s) 65.4 64.3 36.6 56.4 52.9 145.2 22.4 30.4 Level of Service E E D E D F C C Approach Delay (s) 53.2 55.0 41.7 Approach LOS D E D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 7/29/2015 4 Movement SBT SBR Lane]�anfigurations ttT+ Volume (vph) 955 76 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4969 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4969 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 1016 81 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1092 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 9 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr) 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 68.2 Effective Green, g (s) 68.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2420 v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.45 Uniform Delay, dl 23.6 Progression Factor 0.42 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 Delay (s) 10.4 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 12.6 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary 2015 Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 30: West Main St 7/28/2015 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT VVBR NSL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi T 1 1 T Volume (vph) 10 61 12 73 71 57 37 165 77 179 518 27 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1817 1770 1738 1770 1774 1770 1849 Flt Permitted 0.67 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.51 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1245 1817 901 1738 627 1774 947 1849 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 66 13 79 77 62 40 179 84 195 563 29 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 30 0 0 17 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 71 0 79 109 0 40 246 0 195 590 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.1 10.9 22.5 16.3 48.0 44.6 57.0 49.1 Effective Green, g (s) 12.1 10.9 22.5 16.3 48.0 44.6 57.0 49.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.12 0.25 0.18 0.53 0.50 0.63 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 174 220 288 314 377 879 672 1008 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.04 c0.02 c0.06 0.00 0.14 c0.03 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.32 0.27 0.35 0.11 0.28 0.29 0.59 Uniform Delay, d1 33.9 36.2 26.6 32.2 10.7 13.3 7.2 13.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.1 2.5 Delay (s) 34.0 36.5 26.8 32.4 10.7 14.1 7.2 16.1 Level of Service C D C C B B A B Approach Delay (s) 36.2 30.4 13.6 13.9 Approach LOS D C B B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.53 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St II 7/28/2015 -,* ---► t Movement EBL EBT EBR. WBL WBT MR NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT �` tT+ + r 1� Volume (vph) 112 508 365 203 674 65 211 145 88 70 460 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 At Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3578 1489 1770 3443 3406 1855 1501 1782 1815 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (Perm) 1789 3578 1489 1770 3443 3406 1855 1501 1782 1815 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 118 535 384 214 709 68 222 153 93 74 484 126 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 226 0 6 0 0 0 58 0 8 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 118 535 158 214 771 0 222 153 35 74 602 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr 1 2 0 0 4 1 4 1 2 2 0 4 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 30.1 30.1 16.7 35.8 9.8 45.8 45.8 7.4 43.4 Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 30.1 29.1 16.7 35.8 9.8 45.8 45.8 7.4 43.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.25 0.24 0.14 0.30 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.06 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 163 897 361 246 1027 278 707 572 109 656 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.15 c0.12 c0.22 c0.07 0.08 0.04 c0.33 vls Ratio Perm 0.11 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.60 0.44 0.87 0.75 0.80 0.22 0.06 0.68 0.92 Uniform Delay, dl 53.0 39.6 38.5 50.6 38.1 54.1 25.0 23.5 55.1 36.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.6 2.9 3.8 25.5 5.1 13.8 0.1 0.0 12.4 17.5 Delay (s) 65.6 42.5 42.3 76.1 43.1 67.9 25.1 23.5 67.5 54.1 Level of Service E D D E D E C C E D Approach Delay (s) 45.1 50.2 45.1 55.6 Approach LOS D D D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: W Valley Hwy & S Peasley C n Rd 7/28/2015 -v t Movement 158E _EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r t t r Volume (vph) 351 485 406 513 989 308 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 366 505 423 534 1030 321 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 231 0 0 0 62 Lane Group Flow (vph) 366 274 423 534 1030 259 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.0 14.0 11.0 66.0 50.0 50.0 Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 14.0 11.0 66.0 50.0 50.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.73 0.56 0.56 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 534 246 419 1366 1035 879 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.12 0.29 c0.55 v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.69 1.12 1.01 0.39 1.00 0.29 Uniform Delay, dl 35.9 38.0 39.5 4.5 19.9 10.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 92.0 46.4 0.8 26.8 0.9 Delay (s) 38.8 130.0 85.9 5.3 46.7 11.5 Level of Service D F F A D B Approach Delay (s) 91.7 40.9 38.3 Approach LOS F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base SK Synchro 8 Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 7/28/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations + 4 r W. 9) Volume (vph) 29 29 20 394 21 199 34 14 882 311 6 312 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1741 1694 1711 1564 1805 4873 3318 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow perm 1741 1694 1711 1564 1805 4873 3318 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 36 36 25 428 23 216 36 15 928 327 6 325 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 179 0 0 32 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 97 0 227 224 37 0 51 1223 0 0 331 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 13 13 22 22 22 18 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.4 27.6 27.6 27.6 7.2 70.9 19.1 Effective Green, g (s) 19.4 27.6 27.6 27.6 7.7 71.4 19.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.45 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 211 292 295 269 86 2174 406 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.13 0.13 0.03 0.25 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.78 0.76 0.14 0.59 0.56 0.82 Uniform Delay, dl 65.4 63.3 63.0 56.1 74.6 32.8 68.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 11.2 9.6 0.1 7.1 1.1 11.3 Delay (s) 66.0 74.5 72.6 56.2 81.7 33.8 80.3 Level of Service E E E E F C F Approach Delay (s) 66.0 67.9 35.7 Approach LOS E E D Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay 43.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/0112014 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 7/28/2015 1 4/ Movement SBT SBR Larjjl�onfigurations tfl� Volume (vph) 1773 63 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 4982 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4982 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 1847 66 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1911 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 82.8 Effective Green, g (s) 83.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2593 v/s Ratio Prot c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.74 Uniform Delay, dl 29.8 Progression Factor 1.02 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 Delay (s) 32.4 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 39.5 Approach LOS D iwersactbi Suminiry 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 7/28/2015 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 7/28/2015 --V -+-- A, T lb. \10� 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations f T� *i tT t r *i T r Volume (vph) 132 369 108 200 360 117 140 236 188 333 484 194 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.94 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 3353 1716 3166 1760 1784 1440 1779 1846 1477 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1824 3353 1716 3166 276 1784 1440 735 1846 1477 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 148 415 121 233 419 136 152 257 204 366 532 213 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 19 0 0 0 133 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 148 520 0 233 536 0 152 257 71 366 532 213 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 6 6 20 20 35 35 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 45.2 23.9 53.1 60.4 39.0 39.0 60.4 52.2 68.2 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 45.2 23.9 53.1 60.4 39.0 39.0 60.4 52.2 68.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.30 0.16 0.35 0.40 0.26 0.26 0.40 0.35 0.45 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 194 1010 273 1120 192 463 374 444 642 671 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.16 c0.14 c0.17 0.04 0.14 c0.12 c0.29 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 0.05 0.21 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.51 0.85 0.48 0.79 0.56 0.19 0.82 0.83 0.32 Uniform Delay, dl 65.2 43.3 61.3 37.7 59.9 48.0 43.2 46.5 44.8 26.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.7 1.9 21.2 1.5 18.5 0.8 0.1 11.3 8.3 0.1 Delay (s) 79.8 45.2 82.6 39.2 78.4 48.8 43.3 57.7 53.1 26.2 Level of Service E D F D E D D E D C Approach Delay (s) 52.7 52.0 54.3 49.4 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection Surnmafy HCM 2000 Control Delay 51.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/01/2014 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 7/28/2015 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St 1I7/28/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 +1 t r tll� Volume (vph) 142 299 94 347 713 80 99 373 272 66 498 300 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 3% 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1743 3321 1718 3438 1791 1900 1574 1740 3278 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1743 3321 1718 3438 296 1900 1574 609 3278 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 153 322 101 377 775 87 106 401 292 69 524 316 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 26 0 0 8 0 0 0 91 0 69 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 153 397 0 377 854 0 106 401 201 69 771 0 Confl. Peds. (Whr) 3 3 8 8 2 2 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 6 6 2 0 2 0 4 4 6 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA pm+ov D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.3 20.2 29.6 35.5 51.2 44.9 74.5 51.2 40.3 Effective Green, g (s) 14.3 20.2 29.6 35.5 51.2 44.9 74.5 51.2 40.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.17 0.25 0.30 0.43 0.37 0.62 0.43 0.34 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 207 559 423 1017 262 710 1042 319 1100 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 0.12 c0.22 c0.25 0.04 c0.21 0.05 0.01 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.08 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.71 0.89 0.84 0.40 0.56 0.19 0.22 0.70 Uniform Delay, d1 51.0 47.1 43.6 39.6 40.8 29.8 9.8 21.8 34.6 Progression Factor 0.93 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.27 1.00 0.96 Incremental Delay, d2 11.2 3.5 19.9 6.0 0.4 3.2 0.0 0.1 2.3 Delay (s) 58.4 51.5 63.5 45.5 41.6 33.3 12.5 21.8 35.4 Level of Service E D E D D C B C D Approach Delay (s) 53.4 51.0 26.8 34.4 Approach LOS D D C C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 41.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Cout Consultant - Oct 14, 2014 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 St/S 320 St 1I7/28/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR +NBL WBT WBR N9L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t4 t (rr t r 1 0 Volume (vph) 81 636 117 329 1047 125 185 317 230 97 360 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1742 3369 1796 3468 1738 1891 1570 1750 3401 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 1742 3369 1796 3468 267 1891 1570 225 3401 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 699 129 358 1138 136 210 360 261 105 391 136 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 0 41 0 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 819 0 358 1269 0 210 360 220 105 505 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA pm+ov D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 60.5 35.3 83.8 45.2 34.1 69.4 45.2 27.4 Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 60.5 35.3 83.8 45.2 34.1 69.4 45.2 27.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.38 0.22 0.52 0.28 0.21 0.43 0.28 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 130 1273 396 1816 239 403 680 169 582 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.24 c0.20 c0.37 c0.10 c0.19 0.07 0.04 0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.07 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.64 0.90 0.70 0.88 0.89 0.32 0.62 0.87 Uniform Delay, dl 72.2 40.9 60.7 28.6 64.7 61.2 29.8 66.9 64.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 11.3 2.5 22.9 2.3 27.7 20.9 0.1 5.0 12.5 Delay (s) 83.4 43.4 83.6 30.9 92.4 82.1 29.9 71.9 77.0 Level of Service F D F C F F C E E Approach Delay (s) 47.3 42.5 68.3 76.2 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Sumnla HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/15/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SIB Ramp & S 320 St/S 320 St & 1-5 SB Ramp 7/28/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SWL2 SINL SNR Lane Configurations tt r I tt rrif Volume (vph) 0 1365 304 85 1212 0 0 0 502 3 872 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 At Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3507 1506 1759 3560 1667 1681 3600 At Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3507 1506 218 3560 1667 1681 3600 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1452 323 88 1249 0 0 0 523 3 908 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1452 235 88 1249 0 0 0 261 265 808 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 5 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 4 4 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 103.5 103.5 113.5 103.5 31.5 31.5 46.5 Effective Green, g (s) 103.5 103.5 113.5 103.5 31.5 31.5 46.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.71 0.65 0.20 0.20 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2268 974 250 2302 328 330 1046 v/s Ratio Prot c0.41 0.02 0.35 0.16 0.16 c0.22 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.24 0.35 0.54 0.80 0.80 0.77 Uniform Delay, dl 17.0 11.8 29.3 15.4 61.2 61.3 51.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.8 11.8 12.5 3.3 Delay (s) 18.4 12.4 25.7 12.6 72.9 73.8 55.2 Level of Service B B C B E E E Approach Delay (s) 17.3 13.5 0.0 61.9 Approach LOS B B A E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps & S 320 St & 1-5 NB Ramp 7/28/2015 --1' -;� jr- I 'e* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR SBL SBR NEL2 NEL NBR Lane Configurations "fit r tT-1 Volume (vph) 0 1236 602 0 858 202 0 0 385 0 331 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.87 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd, Flow (prot) 3507 1575 3453 1651 1489 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 3507 1575 3453 1651 1489 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.88 0.88 _ 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1274 621 0 975 230 0 0 423 0 364 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 28 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1274 621 0 1195 0 0 0 381 378 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 10 10 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr .0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free Actuated Green, G (s) 103.3 160.0 103.3 46.7 46.7 Effective Green, g (s) 103.3 160.0 103.3 46.7 46.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 1.00 0.65 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2264 1575 2229 481 434 v/s Ratio Prot c0.36 0.35 0.23 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.39 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.39 0.54 0.79 0.87 Uniform Delay, dl 15.8 0.0 15.4 52.2 53.8 Progression Factor 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.6 0.9 8.1 16.6 Delay (s) 9.6 0.6 16.3 60.3 70.4 Level of Service A A B E E Approach Delay (s) 6.7 16.3 0.0 65.5 Approach LOS A B A E Inter( Sumina HCM 2000 Control Delay 21.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 St/S Peasley Cyn Rd 7/28/2015 -A --,, f- *-- 4-- T'. Movement EEL EBT ESR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT _ L SBT 5BR Lane Configurations f t r 0 + T r Volume (vph) 215 929 612 215 721 128 170 119 50 142 251 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 1505 1770 3398 1755 1863 1499 1755 1863 1499 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3525 1505 1770 3398 1755 1863 1499 1755 1863 1499 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 224 968 638 224 751 133 177 124 52 148 261 132 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 65 0 8 0 0 0 42 0 0 98 Lane Group Flow (vph) 224 968 573 224 876 0 177 124 10 148 261 34 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.4 57.3 88.7 26.0 59.9 31.4 31.4 31.4 25.3 25.3 25.3 Effective Green, g (s) 23.4 57.3 86.7 26.0 59.9 31.4 31.4 31.4 25.3 25.3 25.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.36 0.54 0.16 0.37 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.16 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 258 1262 871 287 1272 344 365 294 277 294 237 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 c0.27 c0.12 c0.13 0.26 0.10 0.07 0.08 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.01 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.77 0.66 0.78 0.69 0.51 0.34 0.03 0.53 0.89 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 66.8 45.4 26.1 64.3 42.2 57.5 55.4 52.0 61.9 66.0 58.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 24.4 4.5 1.4 11.9 3.1 0.5 0.2 0.0 1.0 25.3 0.1 Delay (s) 91.2 49.9 27.5 76.2 45.2 58.0 55.6 52.1 62.9 91.3 58.1 Level of Service F D C E D E E D E F E Approach Delay (s) 47.2 51.5 56.3 75.4 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4028: 21 Av SW & SW 336 SVSW Campus Dr 7/28/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 0 ++ r tll; A tll� Volume (vph) 232 558 105 177 683 190 203 406 100 16 209 540 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 Grade (%) 0% 1% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util, Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3351 3346 3295 3438 1545 1694 3265 1729 3331 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.19 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3351 3346 3295 3438 1545 214 3265 338 3331 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 244 587 111 203 785 218 211 423 104 18 230 593 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 0 107 0 18 0 0 0 16 Lane Group Flow (vph) 244 688 0 203 785 111 211 509 0 0 248 723 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 5 5 1 1 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 6 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.7 55.0 14.5 56.3 56.3 51.0 27.1 51.5 35.3 Effective Green, g (s) 13.7 55.0 14.5 56.3 56.3 51.0 27.1 51.5 35.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.39 0.10 0.40 0.40 0.36 0.19 0.37 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 327 1314 341 1382 621 243 632 366 839 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.21 0.06 c0.23 c0.10 0.16 0.12 0.22 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.22 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.52 0.60 0.57 0.18 0.87 0.81 0.68 0.86 Uniform Delay, d1 61.5 32.5 59.9 32.4 27.0 54.1 53.9 46.9 50.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.9 1.5 1.9 1.7 0.6 25.5 7.0 3.9 8.8 Delay (s) 69.3 34.0 61.8 34.1 27.6 79.7 60.9 50.8 58.8 Level of Service E C E C C E E D E Approach Delay (s) 43.1 37.6 66.3 56.8 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 49.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/22/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4028: 21 Av SW & SW 336 St/SW Campus Dr 7/28/2015 4/ Movement SSR Laonfigurations Volume (vph) 133 Ideal Flow (vphpi) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, pedlbikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 146 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 7/28/2015 --,, f- ■-- fl *4 t L* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t r tT. M tO 5 Volume (vph) 273 316 383 137 360 108 14 249 987 79 26 79 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1735 1872 1536 1749 3404 3401 4951 1796 Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 323 1872 1536 350 3404 3401 4951 1796 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.86 Adj. Flow (vph) 337 390 473 167 439 132 16 283 1122 90 30 92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 144 0 19 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 337 390 329 167 552 0 0 299 1207 0 0 122 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr) 6 0 4 4 2 6 4 2 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 58.4 42.2 42.2 58.4 33.4 16.3 63.3 17.8 Effective Green, g (s) 58.4 42.2 42.2 58.4 33.4 16.3 63.3 17.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.26 0.26 0.36 0.21 0.10 0.40 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 493 405 269 710 346 1958 199 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.21 0.06 0.16 c0.09 0.24 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.21 0.16 v/c Ratio 1.00 0.79 0.81 0.62 0.78 0.86 0.62 0.61 Uniform Delay, d1 43.2 54.8 55.2 58.9 59.8 70.8 38.6 67.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 47.8 7.9 11.2 3.2 4.9 18.9 1.5 3.9 Delay (s) 91.0 62.7 66.5 62.1 64.7 89.7 40.1 71.6 Level of Service F E E E E F D E Approach Delay (s) 72.1 64.1 49.9 Approach LOS E E D intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/18/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 7/28/2015 Movement SBT SBR Lanel;onfigurations +++ r Volume (vph) 1300 282 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5134 1573 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5134 1573 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 Adj. Flow (vph) 1512 328 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1512 288 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 2 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 64.8 89.8 Effective Green, g (s) 64.8 89.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.56 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2079 882 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 vlc Ratio 0.73 0.33 Uniform Delay, dl 40.1 18.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 0.1 Delay (s) 42.5 18.8 Level of Service D B Approach Delay (s) 40.4 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4218: Hot Rd SW & SW 340 St 7128/2015 -A --,N. "t "t I l I t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r T 1 t r Volume (vph) 39 263 115 187 432 127 232 236 173 76 207 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1844 1502 1747 1782 1756 1736 1778 1834 1572 Flt Permitted 0.24 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 447 1844 1502 925 1782 704 1736 254 1834 1572 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 289 126 199 460 135 249 254 186 83 225 138 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 68 0 7 0 0 23 0 0 0 110 Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 289 58 199 588 0 249 417 0 83 225 28 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 4 4 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 5 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 5 3 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 6 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 62.2 56.2 56.2 62.2 58.1 39.8 32.5 39.3 24.0 24.0 Effective Green, g (s) 62.2 56.2 55.2 62.2 58.1 39.8 32.5 39.3 24.0 24.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.47 0.46 0.52 0.48 0.33 0.27 0.33 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4,5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 276 863 690 520 862 372 470 169 366 314 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.16 c0.02 c0.33 c0.09 c0.24 0.03 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.04 0.18 0.13 0.13 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.33 0.08 0.38 0.68 0.67 0.89 0.49 0.61 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 30.9 20.1 18.2 22.0 23.8 31.7 42.0 31.1 43.8 39.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.1 3.3 3.5 17.6 0.8 2.2 0.0 Delay (s) 31.0 21.2 18.4 20.7 25.6 35.2 59.6 31.9 45.9 39.1 Level of Service C C B C C D E C D D Approach Delay (s) 21.3 24.3 50.8 41.2 Approach LOS C C D D Inters tidh.Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/23/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4840: 1 Av S & SW Campus Dr/S 348 St --p- --* + v. /7128/2015 t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT N1BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 Tt r 0 i tt Volume (vph) 83 635 69 290 1052 153 59 136 34 167 466 161 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% -1% 7% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3384 3437 3443 3578 1577 1711 3320 1799 3613 1593 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (oerm) 3384 3437 3443 3578 1577 1711 3320 1799 3613 1593 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 93 713 78 296 1073 156 67 155 39 180 501 173 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 45 0 15 0 0 0 68 Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 787 0 296 1073 111 67 179 0 180 501 105 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 3 3 1 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #Ihr 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.2 79.6 19.7 90.1 113.6 13.7 18.2 23.5 27.5 36.7 Effective Green, g (s) 9.2 79.6 19.7 90.1 113.6 13.7 18.2 23.5 27.5 36.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.50 0.12 0.56 0.71 0.09 0.11 0.15 0.17 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 194 1709 423 2014 1168 146 377 264 620 410 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.23 c0.09 c0.30 0.01 0.04 0.05 c0.10 c0.14 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.46 0.70 0.53 0.09 0.46 0.47 0.68 0.81 0.26 Uniform Delay, dl 73.1 26.2 67.3 21.8 7.2 69.6 66.4 64.7 63.7 50.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.9 4.1 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.3 5.7 7.2 0.1 Delay (s) 73.8 27.1 71.4 22.8 7.2 70.5 66.8 70A 70.9 50.6 Level of Service E C E C A E E E E D Approach Delay (s) 32.0 30.7 67.7 66.7 Approach LOS C C E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.64 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/22/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 19 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 7/28/2015 n --,, 10. 1 Movement EBU EBL EBT E8R INBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S3T Lane Configurations A W4 )) W. tt r tf Volume (vph) 41 101 993 250 576 1240 55 225 425 460 141 762 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 1 % 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 4863 3369 4965 3288 3390 1511 1796 3578 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1737 4863 3369 4965 3288 3390 1511 1796 3578 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 45 111 1091 275 613 1319 59 242 457 495 147 794 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 26 0 0 3 0 0 0 51 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 156 1340 0 613 1375 0 242 457 444 147 794 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 3 3 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.5 52.2 31.1 60.3 14.3 32.2 63.3 24.0 41.9 Effective Green, g (s) 23.5 52.2 31.1 60.3 14.3 32.2 63.3 24.0 41.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.33 0.19 0.38 0.09 0.20 0.40 0.15 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 1586 654 1871 293 682 597 269 936 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.28 c0.18 0.28 c0.07 0.13 0.14 0.08 c0.22 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.84 0.94 0.73 0.83 0.67 0.74 0.55 0.85 Uniform Delay, d1 64.0 50.1 63.5 43.0 71.6 59.0 41.4 63.0 56.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.46 1.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 5.7 13.0 1.4 16.3 2.0 4.4 1.2 6.9 Delay (s) 67.0 55.8 105.5 61.1 87.9 61.0 45.8 64.2 63.0 Level of Service E E F E F E D E E Approach Delay (s) 57.0 74.8 60.2 60.7 Approach LOS E E E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 64.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/11/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 20 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 7/28/2015 4/ Movement- SBR Laronfgurations r Volume (vph) 150 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1571 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1571 Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0.96 156 88 68 2 2% 2 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 41.9 Effective Green, g (s) 41.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 411 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 45.6 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 45.6 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 7/28/2015 :n --* ---► --* Ir *-- 4-- it 4\ I Movement EBU EEL EBT EBR WBL WBT W13R NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations 1) f tf r M� W r M 0 r Volume (vph) 4 105 1085 316 943 1434 404 157 287 497 482 385 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -4% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1554 3419 3231 1441 3502 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1554 3419 3231 1441 3502 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 122 1262 367 1014 1542 434 167 305 529 513 410 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 86 0 0 186 0 0 22 40 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 127 1262 281 1014 1542 248 0 472 697 283 410 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 4 5 5 1 1 1 14 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot _2 Prot NA pt+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 23 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.3 44.0 44.0 31.0 60.7 60.7 22.0 41.2 77.2 24.3 Effective Green, g (s) 14.3 44.0 44.0 31.0 60.7 60.7 22.0 41.2 77.2 24.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.28 0.28 0.19 0.38 0.38 0.14 0.26 0.48 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 150 1345 408 973 1943 589 470 831 695 531 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.26 c0.20 0.30 c0.14 0.22 0.20 0.12 vls Ratio Perm 0.19 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.94 0.69 1.04 0.79 0.42 1.00 0.84 0.41 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 71.8 56.7 51.9 64.5 44.1 36.7 69.0 56.3 26.7 65.2 Progression Factor 1.09 1.34 1.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.4 9.1 5.6 40.4 3.4 2.2 42.6 7.1 0.1 6.3 Delay (s) 99.8 85.3 85.3 104.9 47.5 38.9 111.6 63.4 26.8 71.5 Level of Service F F F F D D F E C E Approach Delay (s) 86.4 65.7 70.6 Approach LOS F E E Inters--,iian Surnme HCM 2000 Control Delay 72.6 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/09/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Level of Service E Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 ICU Level of Service G 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 7/28/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR Larl41�onfigurations 0 Volume (vph) 699 132 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fit 0.98 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3495 At Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3495 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 744 140 RTOR Reduction (vph) 10 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 874 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 43.0 Effective Green, g (s) 43.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 939 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.93 Uniform Delay, dl 57.1 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 15.2 Delay (s) 72.3 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) 72.0 Approach LOS E In#ersecGon - - 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 23 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5228: 21 Av SW & SW 356 St 7/28/2015 I � --I.'r 4--- 4-- � I ♦ # Movement EBL EBT EBR W$L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� t'-, 1� 4 r Volume (vph) 437 362 3 57 859 226 45 47 13 211 70 394 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -1% 0% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3460 1864 1796 3445 1766 1806 1804 1530 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 3460 1864 1796 3445 1766 1806 1804 1530 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 486 402 3 62 934 246 60 63 17 218 72 406 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 9 0 0 0 326 Lane Group Flow (vph) 486 405 0 62 1163 0 60 71 0 0 290 80 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 4 4 3 3 8 8 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 0 0 3 1 3 1 2 2 0 3 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 1 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.5 64.3 7.1 53.9 10.6 10.6 20.5 20.5 Effective Green, g (s) 17.5 64.3 7.1 53.9 10.6 10.6 20.5 20.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.54 0.06 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.17 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 504 998 106 1547 155 159 308 261 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.22 0.03 c0.34 0.03 c0.04 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.41 0.58 0.75 0.39 0.45 0.94 0.31 Uniform Delay, dl 50.9 16.5 55.0 27.5 51.6 51.9 49.2 43.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 2.52 Incremental Delay, d2 30.7 1.2 4.8 3.2 0.6 0.7 35.1 0.2 Delay (s) 81.7 17.7 54.7 30.7 52.2 52.6 86.5 110.1 Level of Service F B D C D D F F Approach Delay (s) 52.6 31.9 52.5 100.3 Approach LOS D C D F Irterseclion Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 55.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/29/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 24 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5240: 1 Av S & SW 356 St/S 356 St II 7/28/2015 --I. N t 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WSL WBT WBR NBL NBT NSR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r tT+ t r T 14 Volume (vph) 155 485 28 54 812 97 30 30 48 250 49 595 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -4% 5% 3% 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1808 1919 1581 1742 3408 1696 1785 1530 1761 1853 1563 Fit Permitted 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.72 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 274 1919 1581 547 3408 1286 1785 1530 1352 1853 1563 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.87 0.87 0.87 Adj. Flow (vph) 163 511 29 59 883 105 42 42 68 287 56 684 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 16 0 7 0 0 0 63 0 0 105 Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 511 13 59 981 0 42 42 5 287 56 579 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 1 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 74.0 54.7 54.7 74.0 48.6 26.5 9.7 9.7 26.5 13.0 38.4 Effective Green, g (s) 74.0 54.7 54.7 74.0 48.6 26.5 9.7 9.7 26.5 13.0 38.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.46 0.46 0.62 0.41 0.22 0.08 0.08 0.22 0.11 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 493 874 720 529 1380 330 144 123 355 200 571 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.27 0.02 c0.29 0.01 0.02 c0.11 0.03 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.58 0.02 0.11 0.71 0.13 0.29 0.04 0.81 0.28 1.01 Uniform Delay, d1 28.0 24.2 17.9 19.7 29.8 37.7 51.9 50.9 42.9 49.2 40.8 Progression Factor 0.61 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.8 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 12.0 0.3 41.3 Delay (s) 17.2 24.7 18.0 19.7 33.0 37.7 52.3 50.9 54.9 49.5 82.1 Level of Service B C B B C D D D D D F Approach Delay (s) 22.6 32.2 47.7 72.8 Approach LOS C C D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 44.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/16/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 25 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S/ Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 7/28/2I015 } P. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations t r f t_i M f T� }j tt Volume (vph) 239 294 311 238 467 43 2 170 573 58 56 1179 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3470 1891 1594 1764 3509 3240 3281 1753 3492 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3470 1891 1594 1764 3509 3240 3281 1753 3492 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 257 316 334 274 537 49 2 210 707 72 60 1254 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 123 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 257 316 211 274 582 0 0 212 775 0 60 1254 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.6 32.5 32.5 25.0 40.9 11.6 72.3 8.2 68.9 Effective Green, g (s) 15.6 32.5 32.5 25.0 40.9 12.6 73.3 8.2 68.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.16 0.26 0.08 0.46 0.05 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 384 323 275 896 255 1503 89 1503 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.17 c0.16 0.17 c0.07 0.24 0.03 c0.36 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.82 0.65 1.00 0.65 0.83 0.52 0.67 0.83 Uniform Delay, dl 70.4 61.0 58.6 67.5 53.1 72.7 30.8 74.6 40.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.8 12.7 3.6 52.1 1.2 19.3 1.3 14.7 5.6 Delay (s) 79.1 73.7 62.2 104.7 39.7 91.9 32.0 89.3 46.1 Level of Service E E E F D F C F D Approach Delay (s) 71.0 60.4 44.8 45.2 Approach LOS E E D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 26 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S/ Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 7/28/2015 4/ klov�_'nlant SBR 1-4f,onfigurations r Volume (vph) 229 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1568 At Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1568 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 244 RTOR Reduction (vph) 80 Lane Group Flow (vph) 164 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 68.9 Effective Green, g (s) 68.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 675 vls Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.24 Uniform Delay, dl 29.0 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 Delay (s) 29.8 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 27 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5251: Enchanted Pkwy S & S 356 St 17/28/2015 --,, 't f- *-- 4--I * t 4/ MoVenlettt EBL EBT EBR VJ8L WET WSP NEI- NET NSR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT-) Volume (vph) 182 10 234 29 68 6 345 973 51 9 1156 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1765 1539 1749 1856 1796 3543 1778 3540 Flt Permitted 0.59 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1082 1539 678 1856 1796 3543 1778 3540 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 212 12 272 35 82 7 359 1014 53 9 1204 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 214 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 224 58 35 87 0 359 1065 0 9 1209 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 8 8 6 6 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.1 33.1 33.6 33.6 35.0 92.4 2.0 59.4 Effective Green, g (s) 34.1 34.1 35.6 35.6 37.0 93.4 2.0 61.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.58 0.01 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 230 327 150 412 415 2068 22 1358 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.20 0.30 0.01 c0.34 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.04 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.18 0.23 0.21 0.87 0.52 0.41 0.89 Uniform Delay, dl 62.5 51.5 51.0 50.8 59.1 19.8 78.4 46.1 Progression Factor 0.18 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 44.8 0.1 0.3 0.1 16.4 0.9 4.5 9.1 Delay (s) 56.3 24.1 51.3 50.9 75.5 20.7 82.9 55.2 Level of Service E C D D E C F E Approach Delay (s) 38.6 51.0 34.5 55.4 Approach LOS D D C E IntQrscel a Su M rrtal HCM 2000 Control Delay 43.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.84 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 28 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 7/28/2015 --* .4--- it *\ Movement EB.L EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU S8L Lane Configurations 0 0 Zi +0 at Volume (vph) 190 328 108 116 443 92 29 191 764 67 76 129 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 3272 1753 3308 1759 4989 1773 Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 307 3272 442 3308 1759 4989 1773 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 204 353 116 121 461 96 30 195 780 68 84 143 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 11 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 204 445 0 121 546 0 0 225 842 0 0 227 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 29 29 42 42 42 29 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#Pir) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 6 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 49.7 30.3 50.2 31.2 24.5 58.3 32.0 Effective Green, g (s) 47.7 29.3 48.2 30.2 24.5 58.3 32.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.18 0.30 0.19 0.15 0.36 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 247 599 288 624 269 1817 354 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.14 0.05 c0.16 c0.13 0.17 c0.13 vls Ratio Perm 0.16 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.74 0.42 0.87 0.84 0.46 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 46.1 61.8 56.1 63.1 65.8 38.9 58.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 1.30 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 18.8 4.4 0.4 12.6 17.7 0.8 3.0 Delay (s) 65.0 66.2 56.5 75.6 103.8 51.4 61.7 Level of Service E E E E F D E Approach Delay (s) 65.8 72.2 62.4 Approach LOS E E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/25/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 7/28/2015 4 Movement SST SBR LaneXonfig u rations ttt r Volume (vph) 1058 203 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5108 1488 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5108 1488 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 1176 226 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 77 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1176 149 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% Bus Blockaoes (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 65.8 84.3 Effective Green, g (s) 65.8 82.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2100 765 v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.19 Uniform Delay, dl 36.0 21.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.0 Delay (s) 37.1 21.0 Level of Service D C Approach Delay (s) 38.3 Approach LOS D intersection SummaN 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwx S & S 316 St 7/28/2015 --,, ■--- it 7� l* 1w Movement E8L E6T EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU N6L NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 1� T A +0 Volume (vph) 71 58 98 117 78 104 74 201 968 87 41 75 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1569 1697 1585 1769 4940 1737 Fit Permitted 0.31 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 564 1569 819 1585 1769 4940 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 75 61 103 139 93 124 80 218 1052 95 45 82 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 33 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 124 0 139 184 0 0 298 1142 0 0 127 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 14 14 19 19 19 25 25 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 31.7 26.2 31.7 24.9 39.5 93.8 15.5 Effective Green, g (s) 29.7 25.2 29.7 23.9 39.5 93.8 15.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.16 0.19 0.15 0.25 0.59 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 147 247 176 236 436 2896 168 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.08 0.02 c0.12 c0.17 0.23 c0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.12 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.50 0.79 0.78 0.68 0.39 0.76 Uniform Delay, dl 56.0 61.7 67.0 65.5 54.6 17.8 70.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.81 1.11 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.6 19.2 13.7 2.9 0.3 13.8 Delay (s) 57.2 62.3 86.2 79.2 53.3 14.8 92.2 Level of Service E E F E D B F Approach Delay (s) 60.7 81.9 22.8 Approach LOS E F C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 45.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 7/28/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR LaneXoniigurations +0 Volume (vph) 1214 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fri: 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5051 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5051 Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0.91 1334 3 1390 2% 4 0.91 59 0 0 25 2% 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 69.8 Effective Green, g (s) 69.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2203 v/s Ratio Prot c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.63 Uniform Delay, dl 35.1 Progression Factor 1.48 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 Delay (s) 53.3 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 56.6 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St }7/28/2015 n -A r► 'Q it I I0' Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR VVBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations M W-) 9) ttt r M tO Volume (vph) 14 329 773 58 4 363 1282 208 24 185 676 175 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3571 5186 3467 5081 1552 3377 4886 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3571 5186 3467 5081 1552 3377 4886 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 15 350 822 62 4 386 1364 221 27 210 768 199 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 98 0 0 28 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 365 879 0 0 390 1364 123 0 237 939 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 35 35 15 15 15 24 24 24 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.1 52.5 21.7 53.6 53.6 14.9 46.4 Effective Green, g (s) 20.1 52.5 21.7 53.6 53.6 14.9 46.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.33 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 448 1701 470 1702 519 314 1416 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.17 0.11 c0.27 0.07 0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.52 0.83 0.80 0.24 0.75 0.66 Uniform Delay, dl 68.1 43.5 67.4 48.4 38.4 70.8 49.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.61 0.90 1.45 Incremental Delay, d2 10.3 1.1 8.5 3.1 0.8 7.5 2.1 Delay (s) 78.5 44.6 77.9 53.1 62.6 71.4 74.6 Level of Service E D E D E E E Approach Delay (s) 54.5 59.1 74.0 Approach LOS D E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 57.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 7/28/2015 Movement L4 SBU % SBL S8T SBR Lane Configurations M +Tt r Volume (vph) 17 240 871 272 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1487 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3440 5136 1487 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 20 286 1037 324 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 103 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 306 1037 221 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 19 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.9 50.4 50.4 Effective Green, g (s) 18.9 50.4 50.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 406 1617 468 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.64 0.47 Uniform Delay, dl 68.3 47.0 44.1 Progression Factor 0.69 0.88 0.89 Incremental Delay, d2 5.5 1.6 2.7 Delay (s) 52.7 42.9 42.0 Level of Service D D D Approach Delay (s) 44.5 Approach LOS D Intersection Sumn-jary 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 7/28/2015 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations ' +T+ 1) W. Volume (vph) 8 187 869 69 10 55 1559 99 124 81 62 149 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3402 4947 3318 4831 1708 1695 1718 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.36 Satd. Flow(perm) 3402 4947 3318 4831 351 1695 642 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 8 195 905 72 11 62 1752 111 144 94 72 175 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 19 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 203 972 0 0 73 1860 0 144 147 0 175 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 7 7 7 18 18 18 4 4 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.1 97.3 10.5 94.7 33.7 20.7 33.7 Effective Green, g (s) 13.1 97.3 10.5 94.7 32.7 20.2 32.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.61 0.07 0.59 0.20 0.13 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 3008 217 2859 141 213 215 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.20 0.02 c0.38 c0.05 0.09 c0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0:10 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.32 0.34 0.65 1.02 0.69 0.81 Uniform Delay, dl 71.7 15.3 71.4 21.7 70.6 66.9 64.9 Progression Factor 0.84 1.99 0.76 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.8 0.2 0.3 1.0 81.5 7.2 19.5 Delay (s) 67.4 30.7 54.7 8.0 152.1 74.1 84.4 Level of Service E C D A F E F Approach Delay (s) 37.0 9.7 110.3 Approach LOS D A F Intersection Surnma3' HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 7/28/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lane'R�onfigurations 1� Volume (vph) 79 135 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.91 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1639 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1639 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 93 159 RTOR Reduction (vph) 41 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% Bus Blockaqes (#/hr) 0 4 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 25.0 Effective Green, g (s) 24.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 250 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.84 Uniform Delay, d1 65.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.1 Delay (s) 86.9 Level of Service F Approach Delay (s) 85.9 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 7/28/2I015 :n --* --,, --v t Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N&L NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M ttT )) +0 Vi t r T Volume (vph) 7 116 962 19 317 1411 157 68 159 272 395 247 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4899 3483 5141 1733 1735 1506 3359 1674 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 3240 4899 3483 5141 1733 1735 1506 3359 1674 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.86 Adj. Flow (vph) 8 125 1034 20 337 1501 167 77 181 309 459 287 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 0 54 0 12 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 133 1053 0 337 1661 0 77 181 255 459 417 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 10 10 17 17 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 65.6 19.2 75.1 10.2 29.7 48.9 26.5 45.0 Effective Green, g (s) 9.7 65.6 19.2 75.1 9.7 29.2 48.9 25.0 44.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.41 0.12 0.47 0.06 0.18 0.31 0.16 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 196 2008 417 2413 105 316 512 524 465 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.21 c0.10 c0.32 0.04 0.10 0.06 c0.14 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.52 0.81 0.69 0.73 0.57 0.50 0.88 0.90 Uniform Delay, dl 73.6 35.5 68.6 33.3 73.9 59.7 45.5 66.0 55.5 Progression Factor 1.22 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.9 0.9 10.4 1.6 20.2 1.6 0.3 14.7 19.0 Delay (s) 97.0 23.9 79.0 34.9 94.1 61.3 45.8 80.7 74.6 Level of Service F C E C F E D F E Approach Delay (s) 32.1 42.3 57.3 77.7 Approach LOS C D E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: TC2 - 9/24/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 7/28/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lan4onfigurations Volume (vph) 122 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, pedlbikes Frt At Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 7/28/2015 --v f- a-- fl I# `r► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBU NBL NBT NER SBU SEL Lane Configurations + r 1� Zi '{ +T* A Volume (vph) 72 170 123 395 158 23 162 149 1000 211 49 92 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1094 3375 1796 1773 4958 1730 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1812 1094 3375 1796 1773 4958 1730 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 100 236 171 429 172 25 171 157 1053 222 54 102 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 107 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 236 64 429 194 0 0 328 1258 0 0 156 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 16 16 9 9 9 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 72 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 25.2 26.4 26.4 22.8 24.0 35.0 72.5 18.3 Effective Green, g (s) 24.7 25.9 25.9 22.3 23.5 35.0 72.5 18.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.15 0.22 0.45 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 274 293 177 470 263 387 2246 197 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.13 c0.13 0.11 c0.19 0.25 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.81 0.36 0.91 0.74 0.85 0.56 0.79 Uniform Delay, dl 60.6 64.6 59.7 67.9 65.3 59.9 32.1 69.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.34 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 14.0 0.5 21.6 8.9 15.1 1.0 14.1 Delay (s) 60.9 78.7 60.1 89.5 74.2 75.0 33.1 106.6 Level of Service E E E F E E C F Approach Delay (s) 68.9 84.7 41.7 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Summer HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 -Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 7/28/2015 t 4/ Movement _ SBT SBR Lanelponfigurations ttT+ Volume (vph) 1145 88 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5023 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5023 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 1272 98 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1365 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 55.8 Effective Green, g (s) 55.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1751 v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 Uniform Delay, dl 46.6 Progression Factor 0.46 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 Delay (s) 24.1 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 32.6 Approach LOS C Intersection :Sumf. ri ary 2015 PM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St 7/29/2I015 :n --*� - \*. i Movement EBU EBL EBT FBR WBL INBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ' tt r tT M + r T Volume (vph) 23 237 439 68 36 459 62 345 438 108 51 78 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3578 1489 1770 3418 3406 1855 1501 1782 1701 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1789 3578 1489 1770 3418 3406 1855 1501 1782 1701 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 23 242 448 69 37 468 63 352 447 110 52 80 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 36 0 7 0 0 0 82 0 37 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 265 448 33 37 524 0 352 447 28 52 132 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 1 2 0 0 4 1 4 1 2 2 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.0 57.9 57.9 4.9 39.8 16.6 30.3 30.3 6.9 20.6 Effective Green, g (s) 23.0 57.9 56.9 4.9 39.8 16.6 30.3 30.3 6.9 20.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.48 0.47 0.04 0.33 0.14 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 342 1726 706 72 1133 471 468 379 102 292 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.13 0.02 c0.15 c0.10 c0.24 0.03 0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.26 0.05 0.51 0.46 0.75 0.96 0.07 0.51 0.45 Uniform Delay, d1 46.0 18.4 17.0 56.4 31.7 49.7 44.2 34.2 54.9 44.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.6 0.4 0.1 2.6 1.4 5.6 30.0 0.0 1.5 0.4 Delay (s) 55.6 18.7 17.1 58.9 33.0 55.3 74.2 34.2 56.4 45.0 Level of Service E B B E C E E C E D Approach Delay (s) 31.1 34.7 62.0 47.7 Approach LOS C C E D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 44.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St 7/29/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lan4onfig u rations Volume (vph) 87 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 89 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: S Peasley Cyn Rd 7/29/2015 --v 4N 41 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Configurations r 1) t tT Volume (vph) 351 485 406 513 989 308 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 3413 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 1314 1863 3413 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 369 511 427 540 1041 324 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 93 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 369 500 427 540 1272 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1180 544 451 640 1173 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 0.29 c0.37 v/s Ratio Perm c0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.92 0.95 0.84 1.08 Uniform Delay, d1 7.7 10.1 10.2 9.7 10.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 20.2 31.0 12.8 52.4 Delay (s) 7.8 30.3 41.2 22.5 62.9 Level of Service A C D C E Approach Delay (s) 20.8 30.8 62.9 Approach LOS C C E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 41.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 32.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT INBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 41� ft r ttT+ Al Volume (vph) 36 13 6 84 5 271 1 7 1507 194 4 43 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.97 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1684 1722 1771 1619 1805 5085 3432 Fit Permitted 0.97 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 1684 1722 1771 1619 1805 5085 3432 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 14 6 88 5 282 1 7 1570 202 4 45 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 256 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 54 0 47 46 26 0 8 1767 0 0 49 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 0 5 5 0 2 5 0 2 0 2 0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 1.3 104.2 5.8 Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 1.8 104.7 6.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.65 0.04 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 147 161 166 151 20 3327 135 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.03 0.03 0.00 c0.35 c0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.29 0.28 0.18 0.40 0.53 0.36 Uniform Delay, dl 68.8 67.6 67.5 66.8 78.6 14.6 74.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 4.7 0.6 0.6 Delay (s) 69.4 67.9 67.8 67.0 83.3 15.3 75.5 Level of Service E E E E F B E Approach Delay (s) 69.4 67.2 15.6 Approach LOS E E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 24.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 160.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 7/29/2015 # 4/ Movement SBT SSR ca-Fnonfigurations ++T. Volume (vph) 280 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5009 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (oerm) 5009 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 292 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 307 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr 5 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 108.7 Effective Green, g (s) 109.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3418 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 8.6 Progression Factor 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 8.7 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 17.9 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W8R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T# t + t r t r Volume (vph) 131 175 47 70 189 214 110 416 60 52 120 44 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1807 3419 1699 2999 1743 1827 1414 1799 1909 1600 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1807 3419 1699 2999 1192 1827 1414 575 1909 1600 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 141 188 51 75 203 230 118 447 65 56 129 47 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 138 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 141 225 0 75 295 0 118 447 27 56 129 47 Confl, Peds. (#/hr) 21 14 32 11 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D. P+P NA Perm D. P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 52.0 10.9 41.9 67.1 61.2 61.2 67.1 58.0 79.0 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 52.0 10.9 41.9 67.1 61.2 61.2 67.1 58.0 79.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.35 0.07 0.28 0.45 0.41 0.41 0.45 0.39 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 252 1185 123 837 566 745 576 305 738 842 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.07 c0.04 c0.10 c0.01 c0.24 0.01 0.07 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.02 0.07 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.19 0.61 0.35 0.21 0.60 0.05 0.18 0.17 0.06 Uniform Delay, dl 60.2 34.3 67.5 43.2 24.6 34.8 26.8 25.7 30.3 17.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.4 5.8 1.2 0.1 3.6 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 Delay (s) 61.7 34.6 73.2 44.4 24.7 38.4 26.9 25.8 30.8 17.3 Level of Service E C E D C D C C C B Approach Delay (s) 44.7 48.6 34.6 26.9 Approach LOS D D C C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 39.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.51 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St * I 7/2912015 4---� I t Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NSR SBL O'S7 SBR Lane Configurations 0 t 0 Volume (vph) 167 397 60 72 130 18 50 369 263 69 168 48 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3469 1587 3359 1737 1881 1543 1759 3337 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.44 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 3469 1587 3359 1088 1881 1543 822 3337 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 180 427 65 77 140 19 54 397 283 74 181 52 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 9 0 0 0 86 0 16 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 180 481 0 77 150 0 54 397 197 74 217 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 1 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 11% 5% 6% 3% 1% 3% 1% 3% 3% Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 4 6 6 2 0 2 0 4 4 6 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.2 22.7 10.1 16.6 68.4 63.2 73.3 66.0 62.0 Effective Green, g (s) 16.2 22.7 10.1 16.6 68.4 63.2 73.3 66.0 62.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.19 0.08 0.14 0.57 0.53 0.61 0.55 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 656 133 464 648 990 1006 483 1724 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 c0.14 0.05 0.04 0.00 c0.21 0.02 c0.01 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.11 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.73 0.58 0.32 0.08 0.40 0.20 0.15 0.13 Uniform Delay, dl 49.9 45.8 52.9 46.6 11.5 17.0 10.3 13.1 15.0 Progression Factor 0.98 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.5 3.6 3.8 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 Delay (s) 59.6 47.7 56.7 46.8 11.5 18.3 10.4 13.2 15.1 Level of Service E D E D B B B B B Approach Delay (s) 50.9 50.0 14.7 14.7 Approach LOS D D B B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 St/S 320 St 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT: Vi +T t r tT Volume (vph) 78 872 128 92 244 67 37 201 191 74 202 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1742 3382 1778 3359 1737 1891 1547 1747 3494 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1742 3382 1778 3359 1099 1891 1547 574 3494 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 84 938 138 99 262 72 40 216 205 80 217 26 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 21 0 0 0 78 0 8 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 1066 0 99 313 0 40 216 127 80 235 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 5 1 8 5 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages Whr) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 5 7 4 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.8 45.0 10.0 46.2 28.0 28.0 38.0 29.4 29.4 Effective Green, g (s) 8.8 45.0 10.0 46.2 28.0 28.0 38.0 29.4 29.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.41 0.09 0.42 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 139 1383 161 1410 312 481 604 228 933 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.32 c0.06 0.09 0.01 c0.11 0.02 c0.02 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.06 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.77 0.61 0.22 0.13 0.45 0.21 0.35 0.25 Uniform Delay, dl 48.9 28.0 48.1 20.4 31.7 34.5 25.4 31.6 31.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.96 0.87 0.90 1.58 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.0 4.2 4.8 0.4 0.1 2.7 0.1 0.3 0.6 Delay (s) 53.9 32.3 52.4 19.9 27.7 33.9 40.3 31.9 32.3 Level of Service D C D B C C D C C Approach Delay (s) 33.8 27.3 36.2 32.2 Approach LOS C C D C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SIB Ramp/ 1-5 SIB Ramp & S 320 St/S 320 St 8/7/2015 --v r *-- 4\ T '?* 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR W I WBL WBT WBR N9 WBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations tt is A Tt t Volume (vph) 0 1009 411 2 194 669 0 0 0 0 115 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3542 1550 1725 3457 1758 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 3542 1550 376 3457 1758 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 _ 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1121 457 2 216 743 0 0 0 0 128 2 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1121 301 0 218 743 0 0 0 0 0 130 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 1 % 2% 2% 3% 4% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 4 0 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 Turn Type NA Perm custom D.P+P NA Perm NA Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 1 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 72.4 72.4 82.1 87.1 12.9 Effective Green, g (s) 72.4 72.4 82.1 87.1 12.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.75 0.79 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2331 1020 399 2737 206 v/s Ratio Prot 0.32 c0.05 0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 c0.36 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.29 0.55 0.27 0.63 Uniform Delay, d1 9.4 8.0 5.6 3.0 46.3 Progression Factor 0.37 0.20 1.45 1.23 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.2 4.6 Delay (s) 4.1 2.3 8.8 4.0 50.8 Level of Service A A A A D Approach Delay (s) 3.6 5.1 0.0 45.2 Approach LOS A A A D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.56 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: All Traffic Data Services-11/4/04 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SB Ramp/ 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St/S 320 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement Lane$onfigurations W Volume (vph) 412 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fit 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3564 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3564 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 458 RTOR Reduction (vph) 404 Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.9 Effective Green, g (s) 12.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 417 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.13 Uniform Delay, dl 43.5 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 43.6 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps/1-5 NB Ramp & S 320 St 7/29/2015 --1, f ~ t II t 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r tT Vi 4 Volume (vph) 0 579 554 0 573 273 277 1 239 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% -1% 2% 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.87 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 3507 1587 3339 1635 1495 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow(perm) 3507 1587 3339 1635 1495 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 616 589 0 610 290 295 1 254 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 202 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 616 589 0 859 0 265 83 0 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Split NA Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free Actuated Green, G (s) 77.5 110.0 77.5 22.5 22.5 Effective Green, g (s) 77.5 110.0 77.5 22.5 22.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 1.00 0.70 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2470 1587 2352 334 305 vls Ratio Prot 0.18 0.26 c0.16 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.37 vlc Ratio 0.25 0.37 0.37 0.79 0.27 Uniform Delay, dl 5.8 0.0 6.5 41.5 36.9 Progression Factor 0.44 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.6 0.4 11.4 0.2 Delay (s) 2.8 0.6 4.3 53.0 37.0 Level of Service A A A D D Approach Delay (s) 1.7 4.3 44.7 0.0 Approach LOS A A D A Intersection SummaTy HCM 2000 Control Delay 11.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 St/S Peasley C n Rd 7/29/2015 ---* - 0► --t 4 r-- 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ tl + Vi t r Volume (vph) 98 470 52 21 502 83 317 255 95 133 55 151 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3453 1770 3423 1755 1863 1525 1755 1863 1525 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3453 1770 3423 1755 1863 1525 1755 1863 1525 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 103 495 55 22 528 87 334 268 100 140 58 159 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 16 0 0 0 77 0 0 138 Lane Group Flow (vph) 103 541 0 22 599 0 334 268 24 140 58 21 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 27.9 2.6 20.5 18.8 18.8 18.8 10.7 10.7 10.7 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 27.9 2.6 20.5 18.8 18.8 18.8 10.7 10.7 10.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.35 0.03 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.13 0.13 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 221 1204 57 877 412 437 358 234 249 203 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.16 0.01 c0.18 c0.19 0.14 c0.08 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.45 0.39 0.68 0.81 0.61 0.07 0.60 0.23 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 32.5 20.1 37.9 26.8 28.9 27.4 23.8 32.6 31.0 30.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 1.2 1.6 4.3 10.9 1.8 0.0 2.7 0.2 0.1 Delay (s) 33.1 21.3 39.5 31.1 39.8 29.1 23.8 35.4 31.2 30.5 Level of Service C C D C D C C D C C Approach Delay (s) 23.2 31.4 33.5 32.5 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 29.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 80.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 7/29/2015 -A � � Ir � � 1-4 � Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SSL SBT Lane Configurations t r tT 9) +0 Zi ttt Volume (vph) 79 145 132 40 225 43 325 598 57 4 22 284 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1606 1872 1535 1699 3385 3303 4810 1781 4894 Fit Permitted 0.37 1.00 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 623 1872 1535 836 3385 3303 4810 1781 4894 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 076 0.76 Adj. Flow (vph) 104 191 174 53 296 57 428 787 75 5 29 374 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 141 0 18 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 104 191 33 53 335 0 428 855 0 0 34 374 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 9% 1 % 3% 4% 3% 2% 4% 4% 4% 2% 3% 7% Bus Blockages #/hr 6 0 4 4 2 6 2 6 0 6 0 4 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D P+P NA Prot NA Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.9 20.9 20.9 24.9 17.7 18.5 59.7 5.4 46.6 Effective Green, g (s) 24.9 20.9 20.9 24.9 17.7 18.5 59.7 5.4 46.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.16 0.17 0.54 0.05 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 205 355 291 220 544 555 2610 87 2073 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.10 0.01 c0.10 c0.13 c0.18 c0.02 0.08 vls Ratio Perm 0.08 0.02 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.54 0.11 0.24 0.62 0.77 0.33 0.39 0.18 Uniform Delay, dl 42.2 40.2 36.9 34.1 43.0 43.7 14.0 50.7 19.8 Progression Factor 1.66 1.56 6.35 0.92 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.06 1.13 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.2 1.4 6.0 0.3 1.0 0.2 Delay (s) 70.6 63.6 234.3 31.6 38.0 49.9 12.3 54.8 22.5 Level of Service E E F C D D B D C Approach Delay (s) 128.5 37.2 24.8 26.5 Approach LOS F D C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 44.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 7/29/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lonfigurations r Volume (vph) 162 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1539 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (Perm) 1539 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.76 Adj. Flow (vph) 213 RTOR Reduction (vph) 99 Lane Group Flow (vph) 114 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type pm+ov Protected Phases 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 53.8 Effective Green, g (s) 53.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 752 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.15 Uniform Delay, dl 15.5 Progression Factor 1.87 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 Delay (s) 29.1 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS I ntersecfion 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 7/29/2015 --,I.-- Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations W4 M W* M tt f Volume (vph) 5 57 1217 45 196 814 96 1 192 348 440 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 1% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1720 4953 3402 4952 3385 3490 1548 1796 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1720 4953 3402 4952 3385 3490 1548 1796 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 63 1352 50 218 904 107 1 213 387 489 71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 60 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 69 1400 0 218 1003 0 0 214 387 429 71 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 8 7 9 10 2 7 9 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot Prot NA pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 3 1 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.8 75.0 22.2 88.4 13.7 23.9 46.1 8.9 Effective Green, g (s) 8.8 75.0 22.2 88.4 13.7 23.9 46.1 8.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.50 0.15 0.59 0.09 0.16 0.31 0.06 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 100 2476 503 2918 309 556 475 106 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.28 0.06 0.20 0.06 0.11 c0.13 c0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.57 0.43 0.34 0.69 0.70 0.90 0.67 Uniform Delay, dl 69.3 26.1 58.2 15.9 66.1 59.6 49.8 69.1 Progression Factor 0.85 0.66 1.39 0.28 1.00 1.04 0.74 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 13.5 0.9 0.2 0.3 5.2 3.0 19.3 11.7 Delay (s) 72.7 18.1 81.3 4.6 71.0 65.2 56.3 80.9 Level of Service E B F A E E E F Approach Delay (s) 20.6 18.2 62.4 Approach LOS C B E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 7/29/2015 Movement S5T SBR Lane"$onfigurations tt r Volume (vph) 137 45 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3578 1552 Flt?ermitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3578 1552 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 50 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 44 Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.1 19.1 Effective Green, g (s) 19.1 19.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 455 _ 197 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.03 Uniform Delay, dl 59.7 57.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.0 Delay (s) 59.8 57.4 Level of Service E E Approach Delay (s) 64.8 Approach LOS E Intersection 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St * 17/29/2015 -0. -'V .4-- 4- I i Movement EBf_ EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NER SS I-BT 'S-3 Lane Configurations t r tt r M tT tt r Volume (vph) 282 219 169 37 108 29 83 561 34 11 207 63 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3403 1836 1542 1683 3424 1549 3302 3052 1823 3363 1524 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd.Flow (perm) 3403 1836 1542 1683 3424 1549 3302 3052 1823 3363 1524 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 310 241 186 41 119 32 91 616 37 12 227 69 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 149 0 0 28 0 2 0 0 0 37 Lane Group Flow (vph) 310 241 37 41 119 4 91 651 0 12 227 32 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 4% 3% 8% 7% 5% 5% 16% 7% 0% 8% 7% Bus Blockages #/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 30.0 30.0 7.1 19.1 19.1 21.6 89.3 2.6 70.3 70.3 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 30.0 30.0 7.1 19.1 18.1 22.6 90.3 2.6 70.3 70.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.13 0.12 0.15 0.60 0.02 0.47 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 408 367 308 79 435 186 497 1837 31 1576 714 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.13 0.02 0.03 0.03 c0.21 c0.01 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.00 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.66 0.12 0.52 0.27 0.02 0.18 0.35 0.39 0.14 0.05 Uniform Delay, dl 63.9 55.3 49.2 69.8 59.2 58.1 55.6 15.1 72.9 22.7 21.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.26 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 7.1 3.2 0.1 2.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.5 2.8 0.2 0.1 Delay (s) 71.0 58.5 49.3 58.4 54.6 58.2 55.7 15.6 64.8 6.1 21.7 Level of Service E E D E D E E B E A C Approach Delay (s) 61.4 56.0 20.5 11.9 Approach LOS E E C B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 37.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2015 AM Base Synchro 8 Report SK Page 17 Appendix B Future No Action Geometries, Turning Movement Forecasts, and LOS Analysis Results HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 8/6/2015 -0. -,* ' ' fi 4\ l* Movement 1=gL EBT EBR LN8L `,NET 'NBR t NDT NE R SBU SBL Lane Configurations tT tll� 1) +0 A Volume (vph) 316 456 208 170 337 155 30 222 904 80 2 118 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1733 3236 1755 3220 3439 4992 1773 Fit Permitted 0.26 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 467 3236 433 3220 3439 4992 1773 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 316 456 208 170 337 155 30 222 904 80 2 118 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 40 0 0 42 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 316 624 0 170 450 0 0 252 978 0 0 120 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 29 29 42 42 42 29 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 6 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 50.7 43.4 51.2 28.2 14.0 56.0 13.3 Effective Green, g (s) 48.7 42.4 49.2 27.2 14.0 56.0 13.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.30 0.35 0.19 0.10 0.40 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 980 216 625 343 1996 168 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 0.19 0.04 0.14 c0.07 0.20 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.17 c0.24 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.64 0.79 0.72 0.73 0.49 0.71 Uniform Delay, dl 37.3 42.2 51.9 52.8 61.2 31.3 61.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 0.22 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.9 1.0 15.9 3.5 6.1 0.8 11.3 Delay (s) 59.1 43.2 67.7 56.3 39.7 7.5 72.8 Level of Service E D E E D A E Approach Delay (s) 48.3 59.2 14.1 Approach LOS D E B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 36.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/25/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hmy S & S 312 St 8/6/2015 1 Movement SBT SBR Lanelponfig u rations Ttt Volume (vph) 1232 285 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 At Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5108 1476 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (oerm) 5108 1476 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1232 285 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 144 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1232 141 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 55.3 55.3 Effective Green, g (s) 55.3 54.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2017 572 v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.25 Uniform Delay, dl 33.8 29.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 1.0 Delay (s) 35.2 30.0 Level of Service D C Approach Delay (s) 37.0 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary+ 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 8/612015 --* --► f- *-- it 4\ I 7 L* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations T# 1 W, b Volume (vph) 98 66 122 139 71 114 48 208 1144 139 9 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1749 1566 1700 1573 1769 4914 1737 Flt Permitted 0.36 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow perm 661 1566 759 1573 1769 4914 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 98 66 122 139 71 114 48 208 1144 139 9 127 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 52 0 0 47 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 136 0 139 138 0 0 256 1274 0 0 136 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 14 14 19 19 19 25 25 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.8 23.8 28.8 18.2 23.8 73.2 19.0 Effective Green, g (s) 26.8 22.8 26.8 17.2 23.8 73.2 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.16 0.19 0.12 0.17 0.52 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 201 255 172 193 300 2569 235 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.09 0.02 0.09 c0.14 0.26 0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.13 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.53 0.81 0.71 0.85 0.50 0.58 Uniform Delay, d1 56.3 53.7 58.8 59.0 56.4 21.5 56.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.69 0.89 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.1 22.4 9.9 10.5 0.3 1.8 Delay (s) 57.0 54.8 81.2 68.9 56.8 36.6 52.1 Level of Service E D F E E D D Approach Delay (s) 55.6 74.2 40.0 Approach LOS E E D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 36.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 8/6/2015 4 4/ Movement SET SBA: LaneXonfigurations W, Volume (vph) 1522 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fri: 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5065 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5065 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1522 53 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1573 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr) 4 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 68.4 Effective Green, g (s) 68.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2474 _ v/s Ratio Prot c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 26.6 Progression Factor 0.74 Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 Delay (s) 20.8 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 23.3 Approach LOS C Intersection 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 ` �► ~ fl 4\ t Movement EBU EBL EST EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations M +t1T+ M Ttt r 9) W , Volume (vph) 59 415 1259 155 1 479 890 284 16 291 955 341 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3571 5146 3467 5081 1555 3377 4836 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 3571 5146 3467 5081 1555 3377 4836 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 59 415 1259 155 1 479 890 284 16 291 955 341 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 46 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 474 1403 0 0 480 890 170 0 307 1250 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 35 35 15 15 15 24 24 24 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 41.5 20.0 41.5 41.5 16.4 39.0 Effective Green, g (s) 19.5 41.5 20.0 41.5 41.5 16.4 39.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.30 0.14 0.30 0.30 0.12 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 497 1525 495 1506 460 395 1347 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.27 c0.14 0.18 0.09 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.92 0.97 0.59 0.37 0.78 0.93 Uniform Delay, dl 59.8 47.6 59.7 42.0 38.9 60.0 49.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.45 2.22 0.68 1.02 Incremental Delay, d2 28.6 10.5 26.2 1.2 1.6 5.1 8.1 Delay (s) 88.4 58.1 100.4 62.1 88.1 46.0 58.1 Level of Service F E F E F D E Approach Delay (s) 65.7 77.7 55.8 Approach LOS E E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 63.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.8% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 L4 \1' Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M +tt r Volume (vph) 27 428 1047 248 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1493 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3440 5136 1493 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 27 428 1047 248 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 98 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 455 1047 150 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 19 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 41.6 41.6 Effective Green, g (s) 19.0 41.6 41.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 466 1526 443 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.69 0.34 Uniform Delay, dl 60.3 43.4 38.4 Progression Factor 0.96 0.93 1.32 Incremental Delay, d2 30.4 2.0 1.6 Delay (s) 88.1 42.3 52.2 Level of Service F D D Approach Delay (s) 55.6 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 8/612015 � � (F, 'r Movement EBL EST EBR W8U W8L WBT :)1BR tIEL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M +0 91 ttP 1 1� Volume (vph) 323 1666 186 9 122 1388 197 156 87 89 248 129 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3402 4925 3318 4771 1708 1674 1718 1649 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.39 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3402 4925 3318 4771 285 1674 698 1649 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 323 1666 186 9 122 1388 197 156 87 89 248 129 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 0 11 0 0 28 0 0 42 Lane Group Flow (vph) 323 1844 0 0 131 1574 0 156 148 0 248 285 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 18 18 18 4 4 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.4 74.4 10.5 68.5 36.6 20.4 36.6 27.7 Effective Green, g (s) 16.4 74.4 10.5 68.5 35.6 19.9 35.6 27.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.53 0.08 0.49 0.25 0.14 0.25 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 398 2617 248 2334 157 237 291 320 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.37 0.04 c0.33 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 c0.12 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.70 0.53 0.67 0.99 0.62 0.85 0.89 Uniform Delay, d1 60.3 24.6 62.4 27.2 60.7 56.5 46.7 55.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.29 0.66 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.6 0.8 0.7 1.2 69.5 3.6 20.0 24.6 Delay (s) 66.0 32.4 41.8 9.5 130.2 60.2 66.7 79.5 Level of Service E C D A F E E E Approach Delay (s) & 37.4 11.9 93.1 74.0 Approach LOS D B F E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 36.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 4/ Movement SBR La n4Config u rations Volume (vph) 198 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Said. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 198 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 2b --* 4--- 4- t 140. Movement EBU EBL EET E'''R �A? `0JET '�)JBR iJEL MET NB'R SBL SBT Lane Configurations M ttl� VI) TTl + r 1) T# Volume (vph) 6 289 1450 65 637 1496 344 40 159 323 499 237 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4875 3483 5062 1733 1735 1514 3359 1666 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3240 4875 3483 5062 1733 1735 1514 3359 1666 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 289 1450 65 637 1496 344 40 159 323 499 237 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 24 0 0 0 60 0 16 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 295 1512 0 637 1816 0 40 159 263 499 354 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 10 10 17 17 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% Bus Blockages #/hr 4 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.5 51.7 23.5 62.7 8.2 22.8 46.3 22.0 36.6 Effective Green, g (s) 12.5 51.7 23.5 62.7 7.7 22.3 46.3 21.5 36.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.37 0.17 0.45 0.06 0.16 0.33 0.15 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 289 1800 584 2267 95 276 560 515 429 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.31 c0.18 0.36 0.02 0.09 0.08 c0.15 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 1.02 0.84 1.09 0.80 0.42 0.58 0.47 0.97 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 63.8 40.4 58.2 33.3 64.0 54.5 37.1 58.9 49.0 Progression Factor 0.94 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 56.8 4.6 64.3 3.1 1.1 1.8 0.2 31.3 11.7 Delay (s) 116.8 42.7 122.6 36.4 65.1 56.3 37.3 90.2 60.7 Level of Service F D F D E E D F E Approach Delay (s) 54.8 58.5 45.2 77.6 Approach LOS D E D E Interseolion Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 59.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: TC2 - 9/24/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 816/2015 MA Movement SBR Lan4onfigurations Volume (vph) 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 133 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/6/2015 i.Acyement EEL EST 7-PR ML WST WBR NBU NBL NOT NBR S3U SSL Lane Configurations t r 1 W, Volume (vph) 169 182 198 515 287 49 83 174 1384 213 5 207 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1097 3375 1790 1773 5002 1730 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1812 1097 3375 1790 1773 5002 1730 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 169 182 198 515 287 49 83 174 1384 213 5 207 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 108 0 5 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 169 182 90 515 331 0 0 257 1584 0 0 212 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 16 16 9 9 9 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 8 72 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.9 23.6 23.6 22.8 30.5 21.0 55.6 18.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.4 23.1 23.1 22.3 30.0 21.0 55.6 18.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.21 0.15 0.40 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 195 298 181 537 383 265 1986 222 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 0.10 c0.15 c0.19 c0.14 c0.32 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.61 0.50 0.96 0.86 0.97 0.80 0.95 Uniform Delay, dl 61.3 54.3 53.2 58.4 53.0 59.2 37.2 60.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.29 Incremental Delay, d2 29.9 2.6 0.8 28.2 17.5 46.1 3.4 34.6 Delay (s) 91.2 56.9 54.0 86.6 70.5 105.3 40.7 112.9 Level of Service F E D F E F D F Approach Delay (s) 66.4 80.3 49.6 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Surnmary HCM 2000 Control Delay 50.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 -Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/6/2015 t 4/ Movement SST SBR Lane�F,onfigurations +0 Volume (vph) 1160 289 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, pedlbikes 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fri: 0.97 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4900 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4900 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1160 289 RTOR Reduction (vph) 27 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1422 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 52.6 Effective Green, g (s) 52.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1841 v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 38.4 Progression Factor 0.47 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 Delay (s) 20.0 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 31.9 Approach LOS C Intersection Sumrnary 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: S Peasley Cyn Rd 8/6/2015 ---t 4\ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r + t Volume (vph) 354 513 493 574 941 430 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 354 513 493 574 941 430 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 277 0 0 0 56 Lane Group Flow (v h) 354 236 493 574 941 374 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.7 22.7 21.8 107.3 80.5 80.5 Effective Green, g (s) 22.7 22.7 21.8 107.3 80.5 80.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.77 0.58 0.58 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 556 256 534 1427 1071 910 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.14 0.31 c0.51 v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.92 0.92 0.40 0.88 0.41 Uniform Delay, d1 54.8 57.8 58.3 5.5 25.6 16.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 35.2 21.4 0.8 10.2 1.4 Delay (s) 56.6 92.9 79.7 6.4 35.8 17.9 Level of Service E F E A D B Approach Delay (s) 78.1 40.2 30.2 Approach LOS E D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 46.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 St/S 320 St 8/6/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r ft r tt r tt r Volume (vph) 0 1300 179 0 1141 268 0 462 338 0 314 130 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3457 1538 3535 1583 3592 1560 3556 1511 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3457 1538 3535 1583 3592 1560 3556 1511 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1300 179 0 1141 268 0 462 338 0 314 130 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 55 0 0 60 0 0 41 0 0 59 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1300 124 0 1141 208 0 462 297 0 314 71 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockaaes Whr) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 96.9 96.9 96.4 96.4 33.6 33.6 34.1 34.1 Effective Green, g (s) 96.9 95.9 96.4 96.4 33.6 33.6 34.1 34.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2392 1053 2434 1090 862 374 866 368 v/s Ratio Prot c0.38 0.32 0.13 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.13 c0.19 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.12 0.47 0.19 0.54 0.79 0.36 0.19 Uniform Delay, dl 10.6 7.6 10.0 7.8 46.4 50.0 43.9 42.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.12 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 10.3 0.1 0.1 Delay (s) 11.5 7.8 10.5 7.9 46.7 60.3 46.7 47.1 Level of Service B A B A D E D D Approach Delay (s) 11.1 10.0 52.5 46.8 Approach LOS B A D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/15/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St II 8l6/2015 -0. ' i A/ Movement ESL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r ) ttt Vi *T W Volume (vph) 0 1715 803 203 1600 0 0 0 0 195 0 1021 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1507 1759 5122 1667 1681 3600 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 5046 1507 1759 5122 1667 1681 3600 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1715 803 203 1600 0 0 0 0 195 0 1021 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 342 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1715 461 203 1600 0 0 0 0 97 98 978 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 4 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Split NA custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 69.0 69.0 24.0 84.4 32.0 32.0 45.6 Effective Green, g (s) 69.0 69.0 24.0 84.4 32.0 32.0 45.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.17 0.60 0.23 0.23 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2486 742 301 3087 381 384 1172 v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 c0.12 0.31 0.06 0.06 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.31 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.62 0.67 0.52 0.25 0.26 0.83 Uniform Delay, dl 27.3 25.9 54.3 16.1 44.2 44.2 43.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 3.9 4.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 5.0 Delay (s) 28.9 29.8 59.0 16.7 44.4 44.4 48.7 Level of Service C C E B D D D Approach Delay (s) 29.2 21.4 0.0 48.0 Approach LOS C C A D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps/1-5 NB Ramp & S 320 St 8l6/2015 --► 'e, 4- 4- 4\ I Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r ttT 4 r Volume (vph) 0 1174 681 0 1283 132 500 2 100 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 2% 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1575 5060 1651 1669 1533 At Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1575 5060 1651 1669 1533 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1174 681 0 1283 132 500 2 100 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 52 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1174 681 0 1410 0 250 252 48 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 1 1 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (Who 0 2 0_ 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 103.5 140.0 103.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 Effective Green, g (s) 103.5 140.0 103.5 26.5 26.5 25.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 1.00 0.74 0.19 0.19 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3730 1575 3740 312 315 279 v/s Ratio Prot 0.23 0.28 c0.15 0.15 v/s Ratio Perm c0.43 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.43 0.38 0.80 0.80 0.17 Uniform Delay, dl 6.2 0.0 6.6 54.2 54.2 48.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.02 1.05 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.9 0.3 13.0 12.8 0.1 Delay (s) 6.4 0.9 6.9 68.4 68.1 50.7 Level of Service A A A E E D Approach Delay (s) 4.4 6.9 65.3 0.0 Approach LOS A A E A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 14.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 St/S Peasley C n Rd II 8/11/2015 -11 --IN. -,* f- *-- i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r 1 0 R1 t r t r Volume (vph) 142 800 204 68 875 112 225 132 57 143 189 377 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 1499 1770 3433 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3525 1499 1770 3433 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 800 204 68 875 112 225 132 57 143 189 377 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 72 0 6 0 0 0 48 0 0 257 Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 800 132 68 981 0 225 132 9 143 189 120 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.8 69.3 90.9 9.6 64.1 21.6 21.6 21.6 19.5 19.5 19.5 Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 69.3 88.9 9.6 64.1 21.6 21.6 21.6 19.5 19.5 19.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.49 0.64 0.07 0.46 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 187 1744 1016 121 1571 270 287 232 244 259 209 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.23 0.02 0.04 c0.29 c0.13 0.07 0.08 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.01 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.46 0.13 0.56 0.62 0.83 0.46 0.04 0.59 0.73 0.57 Uniform Delay, dl 60.9 23.1 10.2 63.2 28.8 57.5 53.9 50.4 56.5 57.7 56.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.5 0.9 0.0 3.5 1.9 18.5 0.4 0.0 2.3 8.4 2.3 Delay (s) 75.3 24.0 10.2 66.7 30.7 76.0 54.3 50.4 58.8 66.1 58.7 Level of Service E C B E C E D D E E E Approach Delay (s) 27.9 33.0 65.6 60.7 Approach LOS C C E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 41.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils320 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/6/2015 --* --. ,-- r L*. Movement EBL EBT EBR 1NBL WBT VVBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t r 0 M tTlk Zi Volume (vph) 183 97 158 84 175 59 2 168 1570 128 5 49 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1732 1872 1537 1743 3392 3401 4950 1796 Fit Permitted 0.53 1.00 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 958 1872 1537 1203 3392 3401 4950 1796 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 183 97 158 84 175 59 2 168 1570 128 5 49 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 133 0 28 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 183 97 25 84 206 0 0 170 1693 0 0 54 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 4 4 2 6 4 2 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.7 22.0 22.0 33.7 23.2 10.1 78.2 7.6 Effective Green, g (s) 33.7 22.0 22.0 33.7 23.2 10.1 78.2 7.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.16 0.16 0.24 0.17 0.07 0.56 0.05 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 288 294 241 334 562 245 2764 97 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.05 c0.34 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.02 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.33 0.10 0.25 0.37 0.69 0.61 0.56 Uniform Delay, dl 45.7 52.4 50.5 44.2 51.9 63.4 20.7 64.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 6.7 1.0 3.9 Delay (s) 49.1 52.7 50.6 44.3 52.0 70.1 21.8 68.7 Level of Service D D D D D E C E Approach Delay (s) 50.4 50.0 26.2 Approach LOS D D C Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.7 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/18/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Level of Service C Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 ICU Level of Service D 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/6/2015 4 4/ P-lwjenient SBT SBR Laner�anflguratiflns +++ r Volume (vph) 1624 212 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5134 1569 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5134 1569 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1624 212 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 75 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1624 137 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 4 2 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 75.7 86.2 Effective Green, g (s) 75.7 86.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.62 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2776 966 v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.14 Uniform Delay, dl 21.6 11.3 Progression Factor 1.00 0.98 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.0 Delay (s) 22.5 11.2 Level of Service C B Approach Delay (s) 22.5 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St * 8/6/2015 t fl I Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT 1NBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations W-) )) ttT) M tTT.> r b) Volume (vph) 18 161 1663 148 627 1015 73 6 214 493 536 149 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 1 % 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 4964 3369 4947 3279 4343 1295 3485 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perml 1737 4964 3369 4947 961 4343 1295 3485 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 18 161 1663 148 627 1015 73 6 214 493 536 149 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 0 0 73 34 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 179 1804 0 627 1083 0 0 220 688 234 149 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 10 3 3 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1% 1 % 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% 5% 5% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 Permitted Phases 5 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 51.0 16.0 48.0 18.1 43.0 59.0 9.5 Effective Green, g (s) 19.5 51.0 16.0 48.0 18.1 43.0 59.0 9.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.36 0.11 0.34 0.13 0.31 0.42 0.07 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 241 1808 385 1696 124 1333 545 236 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 c0.36 c0.19 0.22 0.16 0.05 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.74 1.00 1.63 0.64 1.77 0.52 0.43 0.63 Uniform Delay, dl 57.8 44.4 62.0 38.7 61.0 39.9 28.6 63.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.3 20.7 288.5 0.9 379.0 0.1 0.2 4.0 Delay (s) 68.1 65.1 333.1 32.2 439.9 40.1 28.8 67.5 Level of Service E E F C F D C E Approach Delay (s) 65.4 142.2 108.1 Approach LOS E F F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 93.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/11/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/6/2015 Movement SST SM Laf)'Vonfigurations ttlkl Volume (vph) 641 345 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.95 At Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4853 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4853 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 641 345 RTOR Reduction (vph) 72 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 914 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 34.4 Effective Green, g (s) 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1192 v/s Ratio Prot c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.77 Uniform Delay, dl 49.1 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 Delay (s) 51.8 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 53.8 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 AV S & S 348 SYSR 18 8/6/2015 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT N/BR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations A ttt r ))) Ttt r M tti� Volume (vph) 181 1832 354 786 1168 400 98 408 952 653 320 722 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -4% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1556 3419 3296 1441 3502 5076 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1556 3419 3296 1441 3502 5076 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 181 1832 354 786 1168 400 98 408 952 653 320 722 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 92 0 0 166 0 0 9 52 0 11 Lane Group Flow (vph) 181 1832 262 786 1168 234 0 506 1106 438 320 798 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 5 5 1 1 1 14 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 23 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 45.0 45.0 16.0 42.5 42.5 15.0 46.5 62.5 13.0 44.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 45.0 45.0 16.0 42.5 42.5 15.0 46.5 62.5 13.0 44.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.33 0.45 0.09 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 223 1572 477 574 1555 472 366 1094 643 325 1595 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.37 c0.16 0.23 c0.15 c0.34 0.30 c0.09 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.81 1.17 0.55 1.37 0.75 0.50 1.38 1.01 0.68 0.98 0.50 Uniform Delay, dl 59.1 47.5 39.1 62.0 44.0 40.0 62.5 46.8 30.8 63.4 39.1 Progression Factor 0.63 0.55 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.3 78.3 2.3 177.1 3.4 3.7 188.4 29.9 2.4 45.3 0.1 Delay (s) 47.4 104.3 11.5 239.1 47.4 43.7 250.9 76.6 33.2 108.7 39.1 Level of Service D F B F D D F E C F D Approach Delay (s) 86.1 110.8 108.3 58.9 Approach LOS F F F E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 95.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.14 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/09/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 8/6/2015 41 Movement SBR LiWonfigurations Volume (vph) 87 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Fit Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension s Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 8/6/2015 ---v .- 'fl t 4 Movement EBL EBT ESR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR S9L SBT Lane Configurations + r tl� M +0 Vi ttt+ Volume (vph) 324 601 171 216 420 77 1 108 859 66 72 816 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3470 1891 1594 1764 3468 3240 4735 1753 4762 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.20 1.00 Satd. Flow (oerm) 3470 1891 1594 154 3468 3240 4735 368 4762 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 324 601 171 216 420 77 1 108 859 66 72 816 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 105 0 13 0 0 0 6 0 0 67 Lane Group Flow (vph) 324 601 66 216 484 0 0 109 919 0 72 1185 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 48.4 48.4 61.8 24.8 10.6 49.6 56.2 45.6 Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 48.4 48.4 61.8 24.8 11.6 50.6 56.2 45.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.35 0.35 0.44 0.18 0.08 0.36 0.40 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 892 653 551 222 614 268 1711 213 1551 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 0.32 c0.09 0.14 0.03 c0.19 0.02 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.34 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.92 0.12 0.97 0.79 0.41 0.54 0.34 0.76 Uniform Delay, dl 42.6 44.0 31.3 58.1 55.1 60.9 35.4 27.2 42.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 18.1 0.0 51.7 6.0 0.4 1.2 0.3 3.6 Delay (s) 42.7 62.1 31.3 84.4 90.3 61.3 36.6 27.6 46.0 Level of Service D E C F F E D C D Approach Delay (s) 51.5 88.5 39.2 45.0 Approach LOS D F D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 52.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 8/6/2015 4/ Movement SEP L+Wonfigurations Volume (vph) 436 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Fit Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (oerm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 436 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% Bus Blockages #/hr 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5251: Enchanted Pkwy S & S 356 St I 8/6/2015 --,N. '- *-- 4-- 4\ # Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 1� tT tT Volume (vph) 293 17 355 18 14 12 565 1228 36 17 937 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1765 1540 1751 1737 3484 3558 1778 3542 Fit Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1329 1540 530 1737 3484 3558 1778 3542 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 293 17 355 18 14 12 565 1228 36 17 937 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 265 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 310 90 18 17 0 565 1263 0 17 937 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 8 8 6 6 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (41hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 34.3 34.3 34.8 34.8 25.1 78.5 2.9 56.3 Effective Green, g (s) 35.3 35.3 36.8 36.8 27.1 79.5 2.9 58.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.19 0.57 0.02 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 335 388 139 456 674 2020 36 1474 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.16 0.36 0.01 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.23 0.13 0.04 0.84 0.63 0.47 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 51.1 41.6 39.4 38.4 54.3 20.3 67.8 32.4 Progression Factor 0.58 0.29 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 29.5 0.1 0.2 0.0 8.6 1.5 3.5 2.1 Delay (s) 59.2 12.3 39.5 38.4 62.9 21.7 71.3 34.5 Level of Service E B D D E C E C Approach Delay (s) 34.2 38.9 34.5 35.2 Approach LOS C D C D Intersection Summar HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 30: 8/5/2015 I Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT HBR SBL SHT SBR Lane Configurations 1� 1� I 1� Volume (vph) 10 381 45 296 187 62 32 309 119 32 822 179 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1833 1770 1793 1770 1785 1770 1813 Fit Permitted 0.60 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.39 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1126 1833 201 1793 107 1785 721 1813 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 10 381 45 296 187 62 32 309 119 32 822 179 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 10 0 0 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 423 0 296 242 0 32 418 0 32 995 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.2 32.0 52.0 45.8 73.0 69.4 73.0 69.4 Effective Green, g (s) 33.2 32.0 52.0 45.8 73.0 69.4 73.0 69.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.23 0.37 0.33 0.52 0.50 0.52 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 272 418 242 586 98 884 402 898 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.23 c0.13 0.13 c0.01 0.23 0.00 c0.55 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.32 0.16 0.04 vlc Ratio 0.04 1.01 1.22 0.41 0.33 0.47 0.08 1.11 Uniform Delay, dill 41.0 54.0 41.0 36.6 31.9 23.3 17.4 35.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.75 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 47.0 131.5 0.2 0.6 1.6 0.0 64.4 Delay (s) 41.0 101.0 172.6 36.8 24.1 19.1 17.4 99.7 Level of Service D F F D C B B F Approach Delay (s) 99.6 110.5 19.4 97.1 Approach LOS F F B F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 86.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.16 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St * I 8/5/2015 '*-- I # Movement EBL EBT EBR 1NBL WBT WBR NBL N6T NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ++ r ti p + r 1� Volume (vph) 146 1040 413 271 679 66 291 362 93 75 657 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3578 1475 1770 3439 3406 1855 1493 1782 1831 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)_ 1789 3578 1475 1770 3439 3406 1855 1493 1782 1831 Peak -hour factor. PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 146 1040 413 271 679 66 291 362 93 75 657 125 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 166 0 5 0 0 0 57 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 146 1040 247 271 740 0 291 362 36 75 777 0 Confl. Reds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Sus Blockages (#Ihr 1 2 0 0 4 1 4 1 2 2 0 4 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 37.0 37.0 20.0 42.0 11.0 53.7 53.7 9.3 52.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 37.0 36.0 20.0 42.0 11.0 53.7 53.7 9.3 52.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.30 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 191 945 379 252 1031 267 711 572 118 680 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.29 c0.15 0.22 c0.09 0.20 0.04 c0.42 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.76 1.10 0.65 1.08 0.72 1.09 0.51 0.06 0.64 1.14 Uniform Delay, d1 60.8 51.5 46.4 60.0 43.7 64.5 33.1 27.3 63.7 44.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 15.0 60.8 8.5 78.2 4.3 81.2 0.2 0.0 8.0 81.0 Delay (s) 75.8 112.3 54.9 138.2 48.0 145.7 33.3 27.3 71.7 125.0 Level of Service E F D F D F C C E F Approach Delay (s) 94.1 72.1 76.4 120.3 Approach LOS F E E F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 91.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.11 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.1 % ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils272 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: S PeasleX C n Rd 8/5/2015 -` 4\ T 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Configurations r + t r Volume (vph) 437 665 525 574 1443 597 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 437 665 525 574 1443 597 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 178 0 0 0 53 Lane Group Flow (vph) 437 487 525 574 1443 544 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 17.0 103.0 81.0 81.0 Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 17.0 103.0 81.0 81.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.74 0.58 0.58 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 662 305 416 1370 1077 915 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.15 0.31 c0.77 v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.66 1.60 1.26 0.42 1.34 0.59 Uniform Delay, d1 52.3 56.5 61.5 7.1 29.5 18.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.57 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 284.1 136.0 0.9 157.9 2.2 Delay (s) 54.2 340.6 197.5 8.0 179.9 13.1 Level of Service D F F A F B Approach Delay (s) 227.0 98.5 131.1 Approach LOS F F F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 147.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.38 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 125.5% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/5/2015 --I, --t 4�- ■-- 4-- fl 4\ L4 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 4+ 4 r A +0 M Volume (vph) 38 47 20 606 49 325 34 14 887 565 11 537 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1761 1694 1715 1568 1805 4750 3318 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1761 1694 1715 1568 1805 4750 3318 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 47 20 606 49 325 34 14 887 565 11 537 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 251 0 0 65 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 105 0 327 328 74 0 48 1387 0 0 548 Confl, Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 13 13 22 22 22 18 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.9 31.8 31.8 31.8 6.6 51.8 11.5 Effective Green, g (s) 21.9 31.8 31.8 31.8 7.1 52.3 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.37 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 275 384 389 356 91 1774 284 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.19 0.19 0.03 0.29 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.85 0.84 0.21 0.53 0.88dr 1.93 Uniform Delay, d1 53.0 51.8 51.7 43.9 64.8 38.8 64.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.03 1.03 2.81 1.01 0.90 0.90 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 15.8 14.6 0.1 2.5 3.5 430.6 Delay (s) 53.3 69.2 67.9 123.6 68.1 38.3 488.3 Level of Service D E E F E D F Approach Delay (s) 53.3 86.8 39.2 Approach LOS D F D ntefSt''-[irj 1 Suifinlarl HCM 2000 Control Delay 124.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/01/2014 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/5/2015 4 4/ Movement SBT SBR LarAn onfig u rations +0 Volume (vph) 2139 131 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fri: 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4956 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4956 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 2139 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 2266 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 56.7 Effective Green, g (s) 57.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2024 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.12 Uniform Delay, d1 41.4 Progression Factor 1.24 Incremental Delay, d2 61.0 Delay (s) 112.3 Level of Service F Approach Delay (s) 185.4 Approach LOS F intersection Summary 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/5/2015 dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 8/5/2015 'r A--- AQ d Movement E6L EET EBR V1BL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL aE T SBR Lane Configurations 0 Yj 0 t r '� t r Volume (vph) 260 519 252 428 577 122 150 346 215 333 489 291 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 3281 1716 3210 1760 1784 1444 1794 1846 1508 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1824 3281 1716 3210 190 1784 1444 331 1846 1508 _ Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 260 519 252 428 577 122 150 346 215 333 489 291 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 42 0 0 14 0 0 0 134 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 729 0 428 685 0 150 346 81 333 489 291 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 6 6 20 20 35 35 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.1 33.5 35.5 35.9 48.8 30.3 30.3 48.8 39.0 72.1 Effective Green, g (s) 33.1 33.5 35.5 35.9 48.8 30.3 30.3 48.8 39.0 72.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.22 0.22 0.35 0.28 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 436 794 440 833 178 390 316 312 520 786 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 c0.22 c0.25 0.21 0.06 0.19 c0.14 0.26 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 0.06 c0.23 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.92 0.97 0.82 0.84 0.89 0.26 1.07 0.94 0.37 Uniform Delay, dl 46.7 51.1 50.9 48.2 35.9 52.3 44.7 37.6 48.5 19.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 15.0 35.5 6.3 27.7 20.3 0.2 69.9 25.1 0.1 Delay (s) 48.1 66.1 86.4 54.5 63.6 72.7 44.9 107.5 73.7 19.7 Level of Service D E F D E E D F E B Approach Delay (s) 61.6 66.6 62.3 69.7 Approach LOS E E E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 138.3 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.1% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/01/2014 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St _ 8/5/2015 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2557: 28 Av S & S 312 St 8/5/2015 I Movement EBL EBT EBR VV8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations 41� 4 4 *T r Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 366 2 103 2 0 0 155 307 2 0 265 527 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 366 2 103 2 0 0 155 307 2 0 265 527 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SS 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) 471 2 464 265 527 Volume Left (vph) 366 2 155 0 0 Volume Right (vph) 103 0 2 0 527 Hadj (s) 0.04 0.20 0.10 0.02 -0.68 Departure Headway (s) 7.0 9.5 7.1 7.4 6.7 Degree Utilization, x 0.92 0.01 0.92 0.55 0.98 Capacity (veh/h) 516 365 495 480 527 Control Delay (s) 48.4 12.6 49.0 17.9 59.3 Approach Delay (s) 48.4 12.6 49.0 45.4 Approach LOS E B E E Cretri rirn�r Y Delay 47.2 Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/30/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St 8/5/2015 -.4 --► *-- IQ : 4/ Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT) +T* '� t r 0 Volume (vph) 214 373 134 487 1146 85 104 479 433 73 570 364 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 3% 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1743 3306 3374 3459 1791 1900 1573 1741 3270 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1743 3306 3374 3459 180 1900 1573 326 3270 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 214 373 134 487 1146 85 104 479 433 73 570 364 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 4 0 0 0 117 0 74 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 214 482 0 487 1227 0 104 479 316 73 860 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8 2 2 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 6 6 2 0 2 0 4 4 6 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA pm+ov D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.2 44.0 24.3 50.1 52.7 45.8 70.1 52.7 41.8 Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 44.0 24.3 50.1 52.7 45.8 70.1 52.7 41.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.17 0.36 0.38 0.33 0.50 0.38 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 1039 585 1237 193 621 843 192 976 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.15 0.14 c0.35 0.04 c0.25 0.07 0.02 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.14 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.46 0.83 0.99 0.54 0.77 0.38 0.38 0.88 Uniform Delay, dl 60.4 38.5 55.9 44.8 55.9 42.4 21.5 31.7 46.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.30 1.24 Incremental Delay, d2 44.4 0.1 9.4 23.5 1.5 9.0 0.1 0.3 8.8 Delay (s) 104.8 38.7 65.3 68.3 57.5 51.4 21.6 41.4 67.0 Level of Service F D E E E D C D E Approach Delay (s) 58.3 67.4 39.3 65.1 Approach LOS E E D E Intersection Surnma HCM 2000 Control Delay 59.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: All Traffic Data - May 2, 2012 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 St/S 320 St I 8/6/2015 --a,. -,-* f *-- 4\ t # Movement EBL EBT EBR 1N8L INBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt i" tt �` tt r tt r Volume (vph) 0 965 265 0 1605 279 0 672 342 0 604 235 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% _1% _1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3457 1538 3535 1583 3592 1560 3556 1511 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3457 1538 3535 1583 3592 1560 3556 1511 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 965 265 0 1605 279 0 672 342 0 604 235 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 22 0 0 16 0 0 112 0 0 27 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 965 243 0 1605 263 0 672 230 0 604 208 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 96.2 96.2 95.7 95.7 34.3 34.3 34.8 34.8 Effective Green, g (s) 96.2 95.2 95.7 95.7 34.3 34.3 34.8 34.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2375 1045 2416 1082 880 382 883 375 v/s Ratio Prot 0.28 c0.45 c0.19 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.23 0.66 0.24 0.76 0.60 0.68 0.55 Uniform Delay, dl 9.5 8.5 12.8 8.4 49.1 46.8 47.6 45.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.25 0.95 0.89 1.08 1.14 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.5 1.3 0.5 3.5 1.8 1.7 1.0 Delay (s) 10.0 9.0 17.2 11.0 49.9 43.4 53.1 53.3 Level of Service B A B B D D D D Approach Delay (s) 9.8 16.3 47.7 53.2 Approach LOS A B D D Intersection Surnme HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/15/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SIB Ramp & S 320 St 8/5/2015 Movement EBL EBT ESR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt if ttt Vi 4 M Volume (vph) 0 1695 525 116 1620 0 0 0 0 720 3 1237 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1507 1759 5122 1667 1686 3600 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1507 1759 5122 1667 1686 3600 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1695 525 116 1620 0 0 0 0 720 3 1237 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1695 288 116 1620 0 0 0 0 360 363 1205 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 5 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 4 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Split NA custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 61.8 61.8 17.0 70.4 46.2 46.2 59.6 Effective Green, g (s) 61.8 61.8 17.0 70.4 46.2 46.2 59.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.44 0.12 0.50 0.33 0.33 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summa 2227 665 213 2575 c0.34 0.07 c0.32 550 556 1532 0.22 0.22 c0.33 0.19 0.76 0.43 0.54 0.63 0.65 0.65 0.79 32.9 27.0 57.9 25.3 40.1 40.1 34.7 1.30 3.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.2 2.1 2.1 2.5 45.3 89.7 59.4 26.5 42.2 42.2 37.2 D F E C D D D 55.8 28.7 0.0 39.1 E C A D HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps/1-5 NB Ramp & S 320 St 8/5/2015 --* --io. -'�' *-- 4\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r tO 4 Volume (vph) 0 1776 608 0 1267 207 415 0 336 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 2% 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1575 5016 1651 1664 1533 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1575 5016 1651 1664 1533 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ,.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1776 608 0 1267 207 415 0 336 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1776 608 0 1463 0 207 208 324 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 2 2 1 1 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 94.4 140.0 94.4 35.6 35.6 35.6 Effective Green, g (s) 94.4 140.0 94.4 35.6 35.6 34.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 1.00 0.67 0.25 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3402 1575 3382 419 423 378 v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 0.29 0.13 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.39 c0.21 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.39 0.43 0.49 0.49 0.86 Uniform Delay, dl 11.5 0.0 10.5 44.5 44.5 50.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.02 1.02 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 16.5 Delay (s) 12.0 0.7 9.8 45.6 45.5 67.5 Level of Service B A A D D E Approach Delay (s) 9.1 9.8 55.4 0.0 Approach LOS A A E A Intersection Stimma HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 St/S Peasley C n Rd II 8/6/2015 Movement ESL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I tt '� tT t r t r Volume (vph) 220 1148 693 235 1022 133 175 241 55 142 389 266 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 1527 1770 3431 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3525 1527 1770 3431 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 220 1148 693 235 1022 133 175 241 55 142 389 266 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 22 0 8 0 0 0 39 0 0 141 Lane Group Flow (vph) 220 1148 671 235 1148 0 175 241 16 142 389 125 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.5 43.5 85.0 13.0 35.0 41.5 41.5 41.5 22.0 22.0 22.0 Effective Green, g (s) 21.5 43.5 83.0 13.0 35.0 41.5 41.5 41.5 22.0 22.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.31 0.59 0.09 0.25 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.16 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 271 1095 970 164 857 520 552 446 275 292 236 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.33 c0.20 0.13 c0.33 0.10 0.13 0.08 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 0.01 0.08 vlc Ratio 0.81 1.05 0.69 1.43 1.34 0.34 0.44 0.04 0.52 1.33 0.53 Uniform Delay, d1 57.3 48.2 19.7 63.5 52.5 38.5 39.8 35.0 54.1 59.0 54.3 Progression Factor 1.18 1.14 1.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 14.5 39.5 1.6 226.1 160.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.7 171.1 1.1 Delay (s) 82.4 94.6 32.9 289.6 212.9 38.6 40.0 35.0 54.8 230.1 55.4 Level of Service F F C F F D D D D F E Approach Delay (s) 72.5 225.9 38.9 140.6 Approach LOS E F D F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 125.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.11 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils320 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4028: 21 Av SW & SW 336 St/SW Campus Dr 8/5/2015 --* -'* 4\ L* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL 5BT Lane Configurations 1) 0 ++ r tT Till, Volume (vph) 389 646 105 182 1175 212 203 538 105 16 277 551 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 Grade (%) 0% 1% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3351 3359 3295 3438 1545 1694 3283 1730 3231 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.14 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3351 3359 3295 3438 1545 194 3283 248 3231 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 389 646 105 182 1175 212 203 538 105 16 277 551 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 0 81 0 12 0 0 0 60 Lane Group Flow (vph) 389 742 0 182 1175 131 203 631 0 0 293 812 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 5 5 1 1 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0_ 0 0 6 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 6 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.5 58.1 11.2 52.3 52.3 51.2 29.4 51.7 36.7 Effective Green, g (s) 17.5 58.1 11.2 52.3 52.3 51.2 29.4 51.7 36.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.42 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.37 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 418 1393 263 1284 577 226 689 327 846 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.22 0.06 c0.34 0.09 c0.19 0.14 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.23 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.53 0.69 0.92 0.23 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.96 Uniform Delay, d1 60.6 30.7 62.7 41.7 30.0 37.1 54.1 52.3 50.9 Progression Factor 0.98 0.96 1.10 0.99 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.31 1.34 Incremental Delay, d2 26.9 1.5 6.1 11.4 0.9 32.8 16.6 24.3 21.1 Delay (s) 86.3 31.0 74.9 52.8 32.1 70.0 70.7 92.7 89.4 Level of Service F C E D C E E F F Approach Delay (s) 49.9 52.6 70.5 90.2 Approach LOS D D E F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 64.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/22/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4028: 21 Av SW & SW 336 St/SW Campus Dr 8/5/2015 4/ Movement SBR LaWonfigurations Volume (vph) 321 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 321 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersedion 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/5/2015 --* --,, 4--- 1,- fl L* v. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations Vi t r TT, M ttT Volume (vph) 309 359 388 142 574 111 14 290 1280 116 26 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1735 1872 1537 1749 3446 3401 4944 1796 Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 268 1872 1537 380 3446 3401 4944 1796 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 309 359 388 142 574 111 14 290 1280 116 26 84 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 131 0 12 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 309 359 257 142 673 0 0 304 1389 0 0 110 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages /hrr 6 0 4 4 2 6 4_ 2 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 47.3 33.7 33.7 47.3 33.8 12.0 56.7 15.5 Effective Green, g (s) 47.3 33.7 33.7 47.3 33.8 12.0 56.7 15.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.24 0.24 0.34 0.24 0.09 0.41 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 232 450 369 261 831 291 2002 198 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.19 0.05 0.20 c0.09 0.28 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.32 0.17 0.13 v/c Ratio 1.33 0.80 0.70 0.54 0.81 1.04 0.69 0.56 Uniform Delay, dl 39.0 49.9 48.5 51.8 50.1 64.0 34.5 59.0 Progression Factor 1.44 1.07 1.32 1.12 1.09 1.23 0.91 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 174.8 8.6 4.4 1.2 5.4 64.1 1.9 1.9 Delay (s) 231.0 61.8 68.3 59.2 59.7 143.0 33.2 61.1 Level of Service F E E E E F C E Approach Delay (s) 113.7 59.7 52.8 Approach LOS F E D Intersection 5umma HCM 2000 Control Delay 59.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.1% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9118/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/512015 t Movement SBT SBR Lanegornfigurations W r Volume (vph) 1890 319 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5134 1571 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (nerm) 5134 1571 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1890 319 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 48 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1890 271 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (Who 4 2 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 60.2 73.7 Effective Green, g (s) 60.2 73.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2207 827 vls Ratio Prot c0.37 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.33 Uniform Delay, dl 36.0 19.0 Progression Factor 1.00 0.99 Incremental Delay, d2 4.5 0.1 Delay (s) 40.5 18.9 Level of Service D B Approach Delay (s) 38.5 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4218: 39 Av SW/Hot Rd SW & SW 340 St 8/5/2015 --* --40. { ■-- I Movement EEL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NP-L NBT NBR SBL SB T SBR Lane Configurations tl� 0 to t r Volume (vph) 49 529 125 384 833 205 237 241 175 163 227 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3389 1750 3425 1756 1744 1778 1834 1572 Fit Permitted 0.18 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 331 3389 495 3425 670 1744 232 1834 1572 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 49 529 125 384 833 205 237 241 175 163 227 127 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 20 0 0 0 101 Lane Group Flow (vph) 49 641 0 384 1025 0 237 396 0 163 227 26 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 4 4 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 0 0 5 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 5 3 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 77.3 50.2 77.3 72.0 44.7 35.4 44.2 28.2 28.2 Effective Green, g (s) 77.3 50.2 77.3 72.0 44.7 35.4 44.2 28.2 28.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.36 0.55 0.51 0.32 0.25 0.32 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 236 1215 516 1761 341 440 170 369 316 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.19 c0.14 0.30 0.08 0.23 c0.06 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.27 0.14 c0.24 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.53 0.74 0.58 0.70 0.90 0.96 0.62 0.08 Uniform Delay, dl 16.9 35.5 20.1 23.6 38.1 50.6 59.9 51.0 45.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.43 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.18 1.19 2.22 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 1.6 5.0 1.4 4.9 20.3 55.6 2.1 0.0 Delay (s) 17.1 37.2 33.7 19.5 43.0 70.9 126.4 63.0 101.0 Level of Service B D C B D E F E F Approach Delay (s) 35.8 23.3 60.8 92.3 Approach LOS D C E F Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay 44.2 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10123/2014 c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Level of Service D Sum of lost time (s) 18.5 ICU Level of Service E 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4840: 1 Av S & SW Campus Dr/S 348 St 8/5/2015 II Movement EBL EST EBR WSL WBT WBR NBL WBT MBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M tT Tt if 0 Vi tt r Volume (vph) 109 737 174 295 1452 158 64 147 256 172 765 349 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% -1% 7% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3384 3389 3443 3578 1578 1711 3076 1799 3613 1593 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3384 3389 3443 3578 1578 1711 3076 1799 3613 1593 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 109 737 174 295 1452 158 64 147 256 172 765 349 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 46 0 223 0 0 0 62 Lane Group Flow (vph) 109 897 0 295 1452 112 64 180 0 172 765 287 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 3 3 1 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 62.0 18.0 69.5 93.7 7.5 16.8 24.2 33.0 43.5 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 62.0 18.0 69.5 93.7 7.5 16.8 24.2 33.0 43.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.44 0.13 0.50 0.67 0.05 0.12 0.17 0.24 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 253 1500 442 1776 1112 91 369 310 851 494 vls Ratio Prot 0.03 0.26 c0.09 c0.41 0.02 c0.04 0.06 0.10 c0.21 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.60 0.67 0.82 0.10 0.70 0.49 0.55 0.90 0.58 Uniform Delay, dl 61.9 29.6 58.1 29.9 8.2 65.2 57.6 53.0 51.9 40.6 Progression Factor 0.85 1.04 1.27 1.67 3.96 0.79 1.31 1.08 1.09 1.17 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.7 2.5 3.7 0.0 8.1 0.2 1.2 11.8 1.1 Delay (s) 53.3 32.4 76.1 53.5 32.5 59.6 75.4 58.7 68.6 48.6 Level of Service D C E D C E E E E D Approach Delay (s) 34.7 55.3 73.2 61.9 Approach LOS C E E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10122/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 19 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/5/2015 Ir � 1,- 4\ # Movement EBU E8L EBT EBR 'YBL V45T WBR NSL NBT NOR S8L SBT Lane Configurations W-) )) +0 M tO r B) +0 Volume (vph) 47 128 1456 310 769 1450 60 266 546 579 143 1046 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 1% 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 4886 3369 4968 3288 4347 1296 3485 4957 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1737 4886 3369 4968 3288 4347 1296 3485 4957 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 47 128 1456 310 769 1450 60 266 546 579 143 1046 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 23 0 0 3 0 0 68 30 0 38 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 175 1743 0 769 1507 0 266 768 259 143 1314 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 3 3 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.5 44.3 21.0 48.3 12.8 45.4 66.4 8.8 41.4 Effective Green, g (s) 17.5 44.3 21.0 48.3 12.8 45.4 66.4 8.8 41.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.32 0.15 0.34 0.09 0.32 0.47 0.06 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1546 505 1713 300 1409 614 219 1465 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.36 c0.23 0.30 c0.08 0.18 0.06 0.04 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 vlc Ratio 0.81 1.13 1.52 0.88 0.89 0.54 0.42 0.65 0.90 Uniform Delay, dl 59.6 47.9 59.5 43.1 62.9 38.8 24.2 64.1 47.3 Progression Factor 1.01 0.91 0.61 0.87 1.16 1.34 1.99 0.94 1.09 Incremental Delay, d2 17.5 65.8 238.8 2.5 21.1 0.2 0.1 5.2 7.3 Delay (s) 77.5 109.4 275.2 39.9 94.3 52.3 48.4 65.3 58.9 Level of Service E F F D F D D E E Approach Delay (s) 106.5 119.3 59.5 59.5 Approach LOS F F E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 91.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.7% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/11/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 20 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/5/2015 Movement SBR L$ onfigurations Volume (vph) 306 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 306 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection '_�'un11'10'11 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 } 8/5/2015 :n _-* __,O. -,V a-- 4__ it I Movement EE.0 ESL EOT EBR l;'BL 'A'6T t10R NBU NeL NET NEP 38L Lane Configurations ttt ))) ttt r M 0 if )Vi Volume (vph) 4 111 1584 397 948 1689 427 162 388 739 487 435 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -4% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1556 3419 3301 1441 3502 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1556 3419 3301 1441 _ 3502 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 111 1584 397 948 1689 427 162 388 739 487 435 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 94 0 0 192 0 0 9 55 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 115 1584 303 948 1689 235 0 550 847 315 435 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 4 5 5 1 1 1 14 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA pt+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 23 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 42.8 42.8 18.0 50.3 50.3 17.0 39.8 57.8 19.9 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 42.8 42.8 18.0 50.3 50.3 17.0 39.8 57.8 19.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.13 0.36 0.36 0.12 0.28 0.41 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 126 1495 453 646 1840 559 415 938 594 497 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.32 c0.19 0.33 c0.16 c0.26 0.22 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.91 1.06 0.67 1.47 0.92 0.42 1.33 0.90 0.53 0.88 Uniform Delay, dl 64.3 48.6 42.4 61.0 42.9 33.9 61.5 48.2 30.9 58.8 Progression Factor 0.64 0.50 0.29 1.02 0.98 1.07 0.86 1.03 1.54 1.10 Incremental Delay, d2 27.1 33.1 2.9 213.9 4.0 1.0 161.8 11.3 0.4 15.2 Delay (s) 68.0 57.6 15.1 275.9 45.9 37.1 214.7 60.8 48.1 79.9 Level of Service E E B F D D F E D E Approach Delay (s) 50.1 115.9 105.8 Approach LOS D F F Intersection Surnma HCM 2000 Control Delay 87.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/09/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 8/5/2015 t 4/ Movement SST SBR LarN'4�onfigurations ttT-) Volume (vph) 817 132 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.98 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5048 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5048 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 817 132 RTOR Reduction (vph) 16 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 933 0 Confl. Peds. (#(hr) 14 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% Bus Blockaoes (#/hr) 2 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 42.2 Effective Green, g (s) 42.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1521 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.61 Uniform Delay, d1 41.9 Progression Factor 1.16 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 Delay (s) 49.0 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 58.7 Approach LOS E IntasWen Summary 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 23 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5228: 21 Av SW & SW 356 St II 8/512015 --* ---► N t t W Movement EBL EBT EBR 1NBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S", T SBR Lane Configurations 1� tlt+ Ti 4 iff Volume (vph) 544 402 3 226 1210 231 61 47 13 310 111 399 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -1% 0% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3460 1864 1796 3474 1766 1805 1805 1526 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3460 1864 1796 3474 1766 1805 1805 1526 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 544 402 3 226 1210 231 61 47 13 310 111 399 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 7 0 0 0 268 Lane Group Flow (vph) 544 405 0 226 1431 0 61 53 0 0 421 131 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 4 4 3 3 8 8 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 1 2 0 0 3 1 3 1 2 2 0 3 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 1 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 60.4 19.9 61.8 12.7 12.7 29.5 29.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 60.4 19.9 61.8 12.7 12.7 29.5 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.43 0.14 0.44 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 457 804 255 1533 160 163 380 321 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.22 0.13 c0.41 c0.03 0.03 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 1.19 0.50 0.89 0.93 0.38 0.32 1.11 0.41 Uniform Delay, dl 60.8 28.9 58.9 37.1 59.9 59.6 55.2 47.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.10 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.15 2.39 Incremental Delay, d2 105.6 2.2 27.3 11.6 0.6 0.4 78.3 0.3 Delay (s) 166.4 31.2 91.9 47.1 60.5 60.0 141.8 114.4 Level of Service F C F D E E F F Approach Delay (s) 108.7 53.2 60.3 128.5 Approach LOS F D E F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 85.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/29/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 24 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5240: 1 Av S & SW 356 St/S 356 St 8/5/2015 t--I. %< 4-- t 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL W8T VVI3R N8L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r ► -T+ '� t r t r Volume (vph) 301 490 33 71 1116 102 33 57 52 349 78 779 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 5% 3% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1808 1919 1579 1742 3421 1696 1785 1530 1761 1853 1563 Fit Permitted 0.07 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm 142 1919 1579 579 3421 1261 1785 1530 1334 1853 1563 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 301 490 33 71 1116 102 33 57 52 349 78 779 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 4 0 0 0 43 0 0 208 Lane Group Flow (vph) 301 490 15 71 1214 0 33 57 9 349 78 571 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 71.0 64.9 64.9 71.0 53.5 49.5 23.5 23.5 49.5 46.5 46.5 Effective Green, g (s) 71.0 64.9 64.9 71.0 53.5 49.5 23.5 23.5 49.5 46.5 46.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.46 0.46 0.51 0.38 0.35 0.17 0.17 0.35 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 280 889 731 344 1307 455 299 256 550 615 519 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.26 0.01 0.35 0.00 0.03 0.12 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm c0.41 0.01 0.10 0.02 0.01 c0.11 c0.37 v/c Ratio 1.07 0.55 0.02 0.21 0.93 0.07 0.19 0.03 0.63 0.13 1.10 Uniform Delay, dl 45.1 27.1 20.3 19.7 41.4 30.0 50.1 48.8 36.5 32.6 46.8 Progression Factor 1.24 0.86 1.00 0.92 1.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.53 1.32 1.78 Incremental Delay, d2 75.0 2.4 0.1 0.1 8.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 61.7 Delay (s) 130.9 25.8 20.4 18.2 56.6 30.1 50.2 48.8 57.1 43.1 144.9 Level of Service F C C B E C D D E D F Approach Delay (s) 64.0 54.5 45.0 112.9 Approach LOS E D D F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 76.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/16/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 25 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St } 8/5/2015 � --� --t � it � I L* Movement EBL EST EBR WBL NVBT WBR NBU NBL NST NBR 5BU SBL Lane Configurations + r ►j 0 M ttT Volume (vph) 244 570 316 272 545 48 2 175 983 63 3 99 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% -3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3470 1891 1594 1764 3510 3240 4743 1753 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.17 Satd. Flow (perm) 3470 1891 1594 177 3510 3240 4743 310 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 244 570 316 272 545 48 2 175 983 63 3 99 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 112 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 244 570 204 272 587 0 0 177 1041 0 0 102 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% 7% 2% 4% Bus Blockages (Nhr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA custom D.P+P Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 1 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 42.0 42.0 57.0 29.0 9.5 52.7 61.0 Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 42.0 42.0 57.0 29.0 10.5 53.7 61.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.41 0.21 0.08 0.38 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 669 567 478 242 727 243 1819 220 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.30 c0.12 0.17 c0.05 0.22 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 c0.34 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.36 1.01 0.43 1.12 0.81 0.73 0.57 0.46 Uniform Delay, dl 49.1 49.0 39.3 59.1 52.8 63.4 34.1 25.3 Progression Factor 0.95 1.08 1.15 0.70 1.30 1.00 1.00 0.85 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 37.5 0.2 95.0 6.2 8.9 1.3 0.5 Delay (s) 46.8 90.4 45.6 136.4 74.9 72.2 35.4 21.8 Level of Service D F D F E E D C Approach Delay (s) 68.5 94.3 40.7 Approach LOS E F D Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay 67.8 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.07 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Level of Service E Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 ICU Level of Service G 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 26 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 8/5/2015 1 4/ Movement SET SSR LaneNonfigurations W) Volume (vph) 1385 531 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.96 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4815 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4815 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1385 531 RTOR Reduction (vph) 49 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1867 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 2 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 51.5 Effective Green, g (s) 51.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1771 v/s Ratio Prot c0.39 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.05 Uniform Delay, d1 44.2 Progression Factor 0.90 Incremental Delay, d2 35.7 Delay (s) 75.3 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) 72.6 Approach LOS E inter%,,Ai,�n Slim[nary 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 27 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5251: Enchanted Pkwy S & S 356 St I 8/5/2015 --* ---► --v f- ■-- 4-- t f i 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WSR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations *' r 1� 0 tt Volume (vph) 216 13 522 40 82 10 613 1242 64 14 1337 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1766 1540 1750 1847 3484 3544 1778 3540 Flt Permitted 0.60 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1105 1540 738 1847 3484 3544 1778 3540 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 216 13 522 40 82 10 613 1242 64 14 1337 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 399 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 229 123 40 89 0 613 1304 0 14 1342 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 8 8 6 6 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#mr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.1 32.1 32.6 32.6 22.0 80.9 2.7 61.6 Effective Green, g (s) 33.1 33.1 34.6 34.6 24.0 81.9 2.7 63.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.17 0.59 0.02 0.45 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 261 364 182 456 597 2073 34 1608 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.18 0.37 0.01 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.08 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.34 0.22 0.20 1.03 0.63 0.41 0.83 Uniform Delay, dl 51.5 44.4 42.0 41.7 58.0 19.1 67.9 33.6 Progression Factor 0.62 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.32 1.06 1.16 Incremental Delay, d2 25.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 42.4 1.4 2.5 4.5 Delay (s) 57.5 41.4 42.2 41.8 112.3 26.6 74.4 43.4 Level of Service E D D D F C E D Approach Delay (s) 46.3 41.9 53.9 43.7 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection SurMtra HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 28 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 7/29/2015 _,* -__P. _t j- *-- tl 4\ L* ► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 0 Vi 0 M ttlt4� A Volume (vph) 260 457 166 158 606 133 29 251 888 72 76 134 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1735 3264 1755 3308 3439 5000 1773 Flt Permitted 0.14 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 247 3264 415 3308 3439 5000 1773 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 260 457 166 158 606 133 29 251 888 72 76 134 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 28 0 0 13 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 595 0 158 726 0 0 280 954 0 0 210 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 29 29 42 42 42 29 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 6 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 54.9 37.9 55.4 36.2 14.0 44.9 20.2 Effective Green, g (s) 52.9 36.9 53.4 35.2 14.0 44.9 20.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.26 0.38 0.25 0.10 0.32 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 281 860 316 831 343 1603 255 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.18 0.06 0.22 c0.08 0.19 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.69 0.50 0.87 0.82 0.60 0.82 Uniform Delay, dl 36.1 46.4 46.0 50.3 61.7 39.9 58.2 Progression Factor 1.06 1.09 1.23 1.17 0.61 0.39 1.25 Incremental Delay, d2 33.7 1.9 0.5 9.7 11.9 1.4 17.7 Delay (s) 71.9 52.7 57.2 68.6 49.6 17.2 90.4 Level of Service E D E E D B F Approach Delay (s) 58.4 66.6 24.5 Approach LOS E E C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 51.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/25/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 7/29/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lanelponfigu rations ttt r Volume (vph) 1493 466 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5108 1476 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5108 1476 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1493 466 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 212 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1493 254 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 51.1 51.1 Effective Green, g (s) 51.1 50.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1864 528 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.48 Uniform Delay, dl 39.9 34.9 Progression Factor 1.14 1.93 Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 3.0 Delay (s) 49.0 70.5 Level of Service D E Approach Delay (s) 57.6 Approach LOS E Infersertion Summ�,ry 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU S8L Lane Configurations 1r 1 ttll� A Volume (vph) 71 58 98 173 78 116 79 201 1151 113 46 88 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 1573 1696 1579 1769 4937 1737 Fit Permitted 0.39 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 725 1573 937 1579 1769 4937 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 71 58 98 173 78 116 79 201 1151 113 46 88 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 46 0 0 43 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 71 110 0 173 151 0 0 280 1257 0 0 134 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 14 14 19 19 19 25 25 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages f#/hr 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 31.6 25.5 31.6 21.8 24.5 70.4 19.0 Effective Green, g (s) 29.6 24.5 29.6 20.8 24.5 70.4 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.18 0.21 0.15 0.18 0.50 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension ss) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 275 225 234 309 2482 235 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.07 c0.03 0.10 c0.16 0.25 0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.13 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.40 0.77 0.64 0.91 0.51 0.57 Uniform Delay, dl 53.2 51.2 55.7 56.1 56.6 23.2 56.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.72 0.75 1.50 0.71 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 13.1 4.4 20.3 0.5 1.4 Delay (s) 53.5 51.6 50.2 44.9 62.5 35.2 41.4 Level of Service D D D D E D D Approach Delay (s) 52.2 47.4 40.1 Approach LOS D D D intersection SummaTy HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 7/29/2015 # 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lanegonfigurations ' tT+ Volume (vph) 1729 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5069 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (oerm) 5069 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1729 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1781 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr) 4 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 64.9 Effective Green, g (s) 64.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2349 v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.76 Uniform Delay, dl 31.1 Progression Factor 0.47 Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 Delay (s) 16.2 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 17.9 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/5/2015 Movement ESU EBL EST EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations M W4 M ttt r M ttT.I. Volume (vph) 83 405 1035 63 5 483 1592 211 29 245 829 314 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3571 5201 3467 5081 1555 3377 4825 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3571 5201 3467 5081 1555 3377 4825 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 405 1035 63 5 483 1592 211 29 245 829 314 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 49 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 488 1093 0 0 488 1592 119 0 274 1094 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 35 35 15 15 15 24 24 24 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockaaes Whrl 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 43.5 22.0 45.5 45.5 13.5 39.0 Effective Green, g (s) 19.5 43.5 22.0 45.5 45.5 13.5 39.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.31 0.16 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 497 1616 544 1651 505 325 1344 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.21 0.14 c0.31 0.08 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.68 0.90 0.96 0.24 0.84 0.81 Uniform Delay, dl 60.1 42.1 57.9 46.5 34.5 62.2 47.1 Progression Factor 0.83 0.76 1.25 1.40 2.47 0.75 1.18 Incremental Delay, d2 34.2 2.2 12.2 11.5 0.7 12.5 3.9 Delay (s) 83.9 34.0 84.6 76.7 86.0 59.4 59.5 Level of Service F C F E F E E Approach Delay (s) 49.3 79.2 59.5 Approach LOS D E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 61.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/5/2015 L* \I,. � 4/ Movement SBU SSL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M ttt r Volume (vph) 19 324 1312 355 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1493 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (oerm) 3440 5136 1493 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 19 324 1312 355 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 100 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 343 1312 256 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 19 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 40.5 40.5 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 40.5 40.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 368 1485 431 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.88 0.59 Uniform Delay, dl 62.0 47.5 42.7 Progression Factor 0.91 0.89 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 22.5 5.5 4.0 Delay (s) 79.0 47.9 46.7 Level of Service E D D Approach Delay (s) 53.0 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations M W4 M ttll: 1 Volume (vph) 8 302 1183 128 22 105 1779 106 124 84 63 201 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3402 4927 3318 4835 1708 1697 1715 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.51 Satd. Flow (perm) 3402 4927 3318 4835 273 1697 923 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 8 302 1183 128 22 105 1779 106 124 84 63 201 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 21 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 310 1303 0 0 127 1881 0 124 126 0 201 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 7 18 18 18 4 4 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA _ Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.2 75.6 10.5 70.9 35.4 23.9 35.4 Effective Green, g (s) 15.2 75.6 10.5 70.9 34.4 23.4 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.54 0.08 0.51 0.25 0.17 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 369 2660 248 2448 150 283 289 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.26 0.04 c0.39 0.05 0.07 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 c0.12 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.49 0.51 0.77 0.83 0.45 0.70 Uniform Delay, dl 61.2 20.1 62.3 27.9 61.8 52.5 46.4 Progression Factor 1.01 1.31 0.70 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.06 Incremental Delay, d2 11.0 0.5 0.5 1.8 28.4 0.4 5.8 Delay (s) 72.7 26.8 43.9 13.0 90.2 52.9 54.9 Level of Service E C D B F D D Approach Delay (s) 35.6 14.9 69.9 Approach LOS D B E hito mer.liurr Scmma HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 i 4/ Movement SBT SBR Larie'r�flnflgurafions 1� Volume (vph) 82 279 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.88 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1596 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1596 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 82 279 RTOR Reduction (vph) 93 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 268 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 4 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 26.8 Effective Green, g (s) 26.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 299 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.90 Uniform Delay, dl 55.5 Progression Factor 0.94 Incremental Delay, d2 26.7 Delay (s) 79.0 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) 70.4 Approach LOS E Inter6ecfion Summary 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 2§ � � � � 4\ Movement EBU EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NSR SBL SBT Lane Configurations P tTT )) ttt* + r �Vi 1� Volume (vph) 7 228 1199 54 673 1604 310 73 209 365 566 380 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4875 3483 5085 1733 1735 1514 3359 1686 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3240 _ 4875 3483 5085 1733 1735 1514 3359 1686 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 228 1199 54 673 1604 310 73 209 365 566 380 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 19 0 0 0 58 0 11 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 235 1249 0 673 1895 0 73 209 307 566 525 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 10 10 17 17 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 39.8 25.5 54.8 9.1 25.0 50.5 29.7 45.6 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 39.8 25.5 54.8 8.6 24.5 50.5 29.2 45.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.28 0.18 0.39 0.06 0.18 0.36 0.21 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 1385 634 1990 106 303 605 700 543 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.26 c0.19 c0.37 0.04 0.12 0.09 c0.17 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.90 1.06 0.95 0.69 0.69 0.51 0.81 0.97 Uniform Delay, dl 64.6 48.2 57.2 41.3 64.4 54.2 35.0 52.7 46.7 Progression Factor 0.96 0.95 0.76 0.79 1.18 1.00 0.96 1.08 1.06 Incremental Delay, d2 46.7 9.5 51.5 10.8 13.8 5.1 0.2 6.3 29.5 Delay (s) 109.0 55.1 95.3 43.6 89.5 59.1 33.9 63.1 78.8 Level of Service F E F D F E C E E Approach Delay (s) 63.6 57.0 48.3 70.7 Approach LOS E E D E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 60.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: TC2 - 9/24/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 7/29/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lan4onfigurations Volume (vph) 156 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Fri: Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 156 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% Bus Blockages #mr 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St * 7/29/2015 -► --v it I l► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL N/BT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations Vi T r M 1� W+ Volume (vph) 127 202 140 674 293 26 162 163 1247 235 49 155 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1097 3375 1811 1773 4977 1730 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1812 1097 3375 1811 1773 4977 1730 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 127 202 140 674 293 26 162 163 1247 235 49 155 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 76 0 2 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 127 202 64 674 317 0 0 325 1465 0 0 204 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 16 16 9 9 9 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 72 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.0 22.0 22.0 23.0 31.0 21.0 58.0 17.0 Effective Green, g (s) 13.5 21.5 21.5 22.5 30.5 21.0 58.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.22 0.15 0.41 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 171 278 168 542 394 265 2061 210 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.11 c0.20 c0.17 c0.18 c0.29 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.73 0.38 1.24 0.80 1.23 0.71 0.97 Uniform Delay, dl 61.6 56.5 53.3 58.8 51.9 59.5 34.0 61.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.46 Incremental Delay, d2 14.1 7.8 0.5 124.5 10.7 130.6 2.1 36.0 Delay (s) 75.6 64.2 53.8 174.2 61.8 190.1 36.2 125.6 Level of Service E E D F E F D F Approach Delay (s) 64.2 138.1 63.8 Approach LOS E F E Intersection Scmma HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 -Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 7/29/2015 4 41 Movement SBT SBR LaneNonfigurations W" Volume (vph) 1391 335 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.97 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4905 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4905 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1391 335 RTOR Reduction (vph) 25 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1701 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 54.0 Effective Green, g (s) 54.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1891 v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.90 Uniform Delay, dl 40.4 Progression Factor 0.34 Incremental Delay, d2 3.9 Delay (s) 17.4 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 28.9 Approach LOS C karsec6on s1;llanlary 2025 No Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St 8/7/2015 t 4 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ++ r f'_, + r 1� Volume (vph) 23 338 444 160 55 462 83 495 607 132 53 157 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1697 3578 1489 1770 3392 3406 1855 1501 1782 1757 Fit Permitted 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 801 3578 1489 1770 3392 3406 1855 1501 1782 1757 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 23 338 444 160 55 462 83 495 607 132 53 157 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 90 0 12 0 0 0 96 0 18 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 361 444 70 55 533 0 495 607 36 53 231 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 1 2 0 0 4 1 4 1 2 2 0 Turn Type custom Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 7 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 40.0 53.5 53.5 6.8 20.3 19.9 33.0 33.0 6.7 19.8 Effective Green, g (s) 40.0 53.5 52.5 6.8 20.3 19.9 33.0 33.0 6.7 19.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.45 0.44 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 267 1595 651 100 573 _ 564 510 412 99 289 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 0.03 c0.16 c0.15 c0.33 0.03 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm c0.45 0.05 0.02 v/c Ratio 1.35 0.28 0.11 0.55 0.93 0.88 1.19 0.09 0.54 0.80 Uniform Delay, d1 40.0 21.0 19.9 55.1 49.1 48.9 43.5 32.3 55.1 48.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 181.1 0.4 0.3 3.7 23.7 14.0 103.8 0.0 2.8 13.9 Delay (s) 221.1 21.5 20.3 58.8 72.8 62.8 147.3 32.4 57.9 62.1 Level of Service F C C E E E F C E E Approach Delay (s) 95.9 71.5 101.1 61.4 Approach LOS F E F E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 89.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.20 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils272 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St 8/712015 Movement SBR Lan4Configurations Volume (vph) 92 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, pedlbikes Flpb, pedlbikes Fri: Fit Protected Satd. Flow (Prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: S Peasley C n Rd 8/7/2015 Movement EBL EBR NSL NBT SBT 5BR Lane Configurations r M t t iN Volume (vph) 507 637 470 1366 994 313 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 507 637 470 1366 994 313 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 228 0 0 0 47 Lane Group Flow (vph) 507 409 470 1366 994 266 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.0 26.0 16.0 84.0 63.0 63.0 Effective Green, g (s) 26.0 26.0 16.0 84.0 63.0 63.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.70 0.52 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 743 342 457 1304 978 831 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 0.14 c0.73 0.53 v/s Ratio Perm c0.26 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.68 1.20 1.03 1.05 1.02 0.32 Uniform Delay, d9 43.2 47.0 52.0 18.0 28.5 16.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.46 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 113.2 49.6 38.4 19.3 0.3 Delay (s) 45.3 160.2 101.6 56.4 38.9 7.7 Level of Service D F F E D A Approach Delay (s) 109.3 67.9 31.4 Approach LOS F E C Intersection Sumrr@ry HCM 2000 Control Delay 67.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.1 % ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis + 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/7/2015 --► *-- *-- fl } I 1� L Movement E3L EBT EBR b�JBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT PJoF`. SBU SBL Lane Configurations 4 4 F a W. Al Volume (vph) 99 79 6 206 6 305 1 7 2555 372 4 85 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1790 1694 1707 1569 1805 5019 3318 Fit Permitted 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1790 1694 1707 1569 1805 5019 3318 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 99 79 6 206 6 305 1 7 2555 372 4 85 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 266 0 0 10 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 184 0 105 107 39 0 8 2917 0 0 89 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 13 13 22 22 22 18 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.9 15.3 15.3 15.3 1.2 56.5 6.3 Effective Green, g (s) 18.9 15.3 15.3 15.3 1.7 57.0 6.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.48 0.06 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 281 215 217 200 25 2384 188 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.06 c0.06 0.00 c0.58 c0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 vlc Ratio 0.65 0.49 0.49 0.19 0.32 1.22 0.47 Uniform Delay, dl 47.5 48.7 48.7 46.8 58.6 31.5 54.9 Progression Factor 1.00 0.98 0.98 3.24 1.10 1.03 0.83 Incremental Delay, d2 4.1 0.6 0.6 0.2 2.7 104.6 0.6 Delay (s) 51.6 48.5 48.5 151.7 67.1 136.9 46.2 Level of Service D D D F E F D Approach Delay (s) 51.6 109.4 136.7 Approach LOS D F F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 112.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/01/2014 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & IS 288 St 8/7/2015 Movement S8T SBR Lart'4�ontigurations tt'-i Volume (vph) 513 28 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4965 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4965 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 513 28 RTOR Reduction (vph) 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 538 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hrl 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 61.6 Effective Green, g (s) 62.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2569 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.21 Uniform Delay, dl 15.7 Progression Factor 0.96 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s) 15.2 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 19.6 Approach LOS B Intersection Sumrnary 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/7/2015 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 8/7/2015 -0. II i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tl� 0 t r Vi t r Volume (vph) 230 438 52 75 194 214 178 478 176 107 215 67 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 3453 1716 3008 1746 1784 1462 1795 1846 1522 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1824 3453 1716 3008 1041 1784 1462 459 1846 1522 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 230 438 52 75 194 214 178 478 176 107 215 67 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 183 0 0 0 101 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 230 482 0 75 225 0 178 478 75 107 215 67 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 6 6 20 20 35 35 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr) 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.2 22.7 6.7 12.2 35.5 29.9 29.9 35.5 26.8 44.0 Effective Green, g (s) 17.2 22.7 6.7 12.2 35.5 29.9 29.9 35.5 26.8 44.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.27 0.08 0.14 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.42 0.31 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 367 917 134 429 504 624 511 278 579 784 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.14 0.04 c0.07 c0.04 c0.27 0.03 0.12 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.05 0.13 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.53 0.56 0.52 0.35 0.77 0.15 0.38 0.37 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 31.2 26.8 37.9 33.9 16.3 24.6 19.0 17.0 22.8 10.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 0.3 2.9 0.5 0.2 5.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 33.6 27.0 40.8 34.4 16.4 29.7 19.1 17.3 22.9 10.5 Level of Service C C D C B C B B C B Approach Delay (s) 29.1 35.4 24.6 19.2 Approach LOS C D C B Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85.4 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/01/2014 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 8/7/2015 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St 8/7/2015 Movement EBL EST EBR IN8U WBL W8T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S8T Lane Configurations tT-P M 0 ►j t r Vi 41 Volume (vph) 360 533 81 36 101 207 20 65 372 616 81 289 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 3% 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1743 3382 3365 3447 1789 1900 1579 1740 3388 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1743 3382 346 3447 804 1900 1579 381 3388 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 360 533 81 36 101 207 20 65 372 616 81 289 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 55 0 16 Lane Group Flow (vph) 360 604 0 0 137 221 0 65 372 561 81 339 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 10 8 8 2 2 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 6 0 6 2 0 2 0 4 4 6 Turn Type Prot NA custom Prot NA D.P+P NA pm+ov D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5! 3 8 Permitted Phases 5! 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.9 23.0 41.0 35.1 37.0 30.0 71.0 37.0 29.0 Effective Green, g (s) 28.9 23.0 41.0 35.1 37.0 30.0 71.0 37.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.19 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.25 0.59 0.31 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 419 648 118 1008 313 475 1000 196 818 v/s Ratio Prot 0.21 c0.18 0.06 0.01 c0.20 0.19 0.02 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.05 0.16 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.93 1.16 0.22 0.21 0.78 0.56 0.41 0.41 Uniform Delay, d1 43.6 47.7 39.5 32.1 35.3 42.0 15.0 31.6 38.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.36 Incremental Delay, d2 15.4 20.2 132.6 0.0 0.1 12.2 0.4 0.4 1.1 Delay (s) 59.0 67.9 172.1 32.1 35.4 54.1 15.4 45.8 53.4 Level of Service E E F C D D B D D Approach Delay (s) 64.6 84.8 30.3 52.0 Approach LOS E F C D !ntersectian Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 52.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: All Traffic Data - May 2, 2012 Phase conflict between lane groups. 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St 8/7/2015 J Movement SBR LaWonfigurations Volume (vph) 66 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 66 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St c Critical Lane Group 8/7/2015 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 St/S 320 St II 817/2015 --,, ' t- ',- 4\ t # Movement E B L EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ++ r tt r tt r tt F Volume (vph) 0 1374 258 0 342 182 0 543 438 0 340 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3457 1538 3535 1584 3592 1560 3556 1513 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3457 1538 3535 1584 3592 1560 3556 1513 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1374 258 0 342 182 0 543 438 0 340 127 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 101 0 0 71 0 0 22 0 0 85 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1374 157 0 342 111 0 543 416 0 340 42 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #ihr 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 71.5 71.5 71.0 71.0 39.0 39.0 39.5 39.5 Effective Green, g (s) 71.5 70.5 71.0 71.0 39.0 39.0 39.5 39.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2059 903 2091 937 1167 507 1170 498 v/s Ratio Prot c0.40 0.10 0.15 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.07 c0.27 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.17 0.16 0.12 0.47 0.82 0.29 0.08 Uniform Delay, dl 16.3 11.4 11.1 10.8 32.2 37.3 29.9 27.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.50 3.63 0.87 0.88 1.49 4.14 Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 9.7 0.0 0.0 Delay (s) 18.0 11.8 16.8 39.2 28.1 42.5 44.5 115.1 Level of Service B B B D C D D F Approach Delay (s) 17.0 24.6 34.5 63.7 Approach LOS B C C E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 28.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/15/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St 8/7/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ttt r Vi ttt 4 Volume (vph) 0 1651 413 2 199 886 0 0 0 0 120 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1509 1758 5122 1667 1688 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 095 1.00 0.95 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 5046 1509 1758 5122 1667 1688 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1651 413 2 199 886 0 0 0 0 120 2 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1651 234 0 201 886 0 0 0 0 61 61 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 10 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages Whr 0 2 4 0 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot Prot NA Split NA Protected Phases 2 1 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 68.1 68.1 27.0 90.1 9.9 9.9 Effective Green, g (s) 68.1 68.1 27.0 90.1 9.9 9.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.57 0.22 0.75 0.08 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2863 856 395 3845 137 139 v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 c0.11 0.17 c0.04 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.27 0.51 0.23 0.45 0.44 Uniform Delay, dl 16.7 13.3 40.7 4.5 52.4 52.4 Progression Factor 1.49 6.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.8 Delay (s) 25.7 86.3 41.1 4.6 53.3 53.2 Level of Service C F D A D D Approach Delay (s) 37.8 11.4 0.0 45.2 Approach LOS D B A D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lan4onfigurations W Volume (vph) 417 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fit 0.85 At Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3600 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3600 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 417 RTOR Reduction (vph) 331 Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type custom Protected Phases 45 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 19.9 Effective Green, g (s) 19.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) 597 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 42.8 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 Delay (s) 42.8 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps/1-5 NB Ramp & S 320 St 8/7/2015 II Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r W, 4 r Volume (vph) 0 625 977 0 773 441 282 1 729 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% -1% 2% 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1575 4813 1651 1669 1533 At Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1575 4813 1651 1669 1533 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 625 977 0 773 441 282 1 729 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 625 977 0 1137 0 141 142 695 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 1 1 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages Who 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.1 120.0 45.1 64.9 64.9 64.9 Effective Green, g (s) 45.1 120.0 45.1 64.9 64.9 63.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 1.00 0.38 0.54 0.54 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1896 1575 1808 892 902 816 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 0.24 0.09 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm c0.62 c0.45 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.62 0.63 0.16 0.16 0.85 Uniform Delay, d1 26.7 0.0 30.6 13.8 13.8 24.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.04 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 1.8 1.6 0.0 0.0 8.2 Delay (s) 27.1 1.8 32.1 14.5 14.5 33.3 Level of Service C A C B B C Approach Delay (s) 11.7 32.1 28.0 0.0 Approach LOS B C C A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 St/S Peasley C n Rd 8/7/2015 } --,, � � I Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WSR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r tT t r t r Volume (vph) 210 990 57 22 607 88 331 515 100 138 151 181 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 1529 1770 3426 1755 1863 1512 1755 1863 1512 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 3525 1529 1770 3426 1755 1863 1512 1755 1863 1512 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 210 990 57 22 607 88 331 515 100 138 151 181 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 20 0 9 0 0 0 70 0 0 161 Lane Group Flow (vph) 210 990 37 22 686 0 331 515 30 138 151 20 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Spiit NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.6 44.9 80.7 6.0 34.3 35.8 35.8 35.8 13.3 13.3 13.3 Effective Green, g (s) 16.6 44.9 78.7 6.0 34.3 35.8 35.8 35.8 13.3 13.3 13.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.37 0.66 0.05 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 244 1318 1079 88 979 523 555 451 194 206 167 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.28 0.01 0.01 c0.20 0.19 c0.28 0.08 c0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.75 0.03 0.25 0.70 0.63 0.93 0.07 0.71 0.73 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 50.6 32.7 7.3 54.8 38.3 36.4 40.8 30.1 51.5 51.6 48.1 Progression Factor 1.32 1.25 3.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.2 3.3 0.0 0.5 4.2 1.8 21.5 0.0 9.8 11.0 0.1 Delay (s) 88.1 44.2 27.0 55.4 42.4 38.3 62.3 30.2 61.3 62.6 48.2 Level of Service F D C E D D E C E E D Approach Delay (s) 50.7 42.8 50.5 56.7 Approach LOS D D D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 49.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils320 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/7/2015 --* t L4 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations t �` tT 9) +0 A ttt Volume (vph) 289 377 137 64 306 48 330 1442 91 9 29 544 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1733 1872 1539 1749 3462 3401 4965 1796 5134 Fit Permitted 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 784 1872 1539 421 3462 3401 4965 1796 5134 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 289 377 137 64 306 48 330 1442 91 9 29 544 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 101 0 13 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 289 377 36 64 341 0 330 1529 0 0 38 544 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 7 7 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 4 4 2 6 2 6 0 6 0 4 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot NA Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.6 31.3 31.3 36.6 26.1 15.4 57.2 5.7 47.5 Effective Green, g (s) 36.6 31.3 31.3 36.6 26.1 15.4 57.2 5.7 47.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.22 0.13 0.48 0.05 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 322 488 401 187 752 436 2366 85 2032 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.20 0.02 0.10 c0.10 c0.31 c0.02 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm c0.20 0.02 0.09 vlc Ratio 0.90 0.77 0.09 0.34 0.45 0.76 0.65 0.45 0.27 Uniform Delay, d1 37.8 41.1 33.6 45.8 40.8 50.5 23.7 55.6 24.5 Progression Factor 1.16 1.06 3.42 1.12 1.02 1.11 1.34 1.01 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 24.4 6.5 0.0 0.4 0.1 6.4 1.3 1.4 0.3 Delay (s) 68.1 50.1 114.9 51.8 41.6 62.4 33.3 57.6 25.0 Level of Service E D F D D E C E C Approach Delay (s) 67.6 43.2 38.4 24.7 Approach LOS E D D C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/18/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement SBR LWonfigurations r Volume (vph) 184 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (Prot) 1572 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1572 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 184 RTOR Reduction (vph) 95 Lane Group Flow (vph) 89 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 2 Turn Type pm+ov Protected Phases 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 58.0 Effective Green, g (s) 58.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.48 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 759 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.12 Uniform Delay, dl 17.0 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 Delay (s) 16.9 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/7/2015 --* -%*IrA--- 4- it 4\ t Movement EBU EBL EBT ESR 1NBL VVBT WBR NBU NBL NST NBR SBL Lane Configurations 11 tO )*i W4 M Rtll� r M Volume (vph) 5 72 1222 109 408 828 101 2 197 719 750 74 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 1 % 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 4965 3369 4916 3264 4351 1294 3485 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1737 4965 3369 4916 1883 4351 1294 3485 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 72 1222 109 408 828 101 2 197 719 750 74 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 8 0 0 12 0 0 0 85 42 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 77 1323 0 408 917 0 0 199 1009 333 74 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 10 3 3 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% 5% 5% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 Permitted Phases 5 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.5 48.7 8.0 49.7 22.1 37.2 45.2 5.6 Effective Green, g (s) 7.5 48.7 8.0 49.7 22.1 37.2 45.2 5.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.41 0.07 0.41 0.18 0.31 0.38 0.05 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 108 2014 224 2036 346 1348 487 162 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.27 c0.12 0.19 c0.23 0.05 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.66 1.82 0.45 0.58 0.75 0.68 0.46 Uniform Delay, dl 55.2 28.9 56.0 25.3 44.7 37.2 31.4 55.7 Progression Factor 0.85 0.87 0.63 1.05 1.30 1.42 1.63 0.71 Incremental Delay, d2 14.9 1.5 371.2 0.1 1.2 1.7 2.6 0.7 Delay (s) 61.8 26.5 406.3 26.8 59.4 54.4 53.7 40.3 Level of Service E C F C E D D D Approach Delay (s) 28.5 142.6 54.9 Approach LOS C F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 70.4 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/11/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 ICU Level of Service E 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 19 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & IS 348 St 8/712015 i Movement SBT SBR L41� onfiguraficns ++'O Volume (vph) 248 76 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.96 At Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4951 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4951 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 248 76 RTOR Reduction (vph) 57 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 267 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 2 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 20.7 Effective Green, g (s) 20.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 854 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.31 Uniform Delay, d1 43.4 Progression Factor 0.95 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 41.5 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 41.3 Approach LOS D Intersection Summers 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 20 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 8/7/2015 -,* -► -)v 4-- 4-- 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NST NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations t r tT 9) tTT +0 Volume (vph) 590 271 174 45 379 31 88 867 39 3 11 556 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3470 1891 1594 1764 3514 3240 4755 1759 4928 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.26 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 3470 1891 1594 617 3514 3240 4755 475 4928 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 590 271 174 45 379 31 88 867 39 3 11 556 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 136 0 7 0 0 3 0 0 0 13 Lane Group Flow (vph) 590 271 38 45 403 0 88 903 0 0 14 624 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% 2% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot NA custom D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 1 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.2 26.4 26.4 36.4 20.2 12.8 59.4 61.6 48.8 Effective Green, g (s) 15.2 26.4 26.4 36.4 20.2 13.8 60.4 61.6 48.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.30 0.17 0.12 0.50 0.51 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 439 416 350 282 591 372 2393 _ 267 2004 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 c0.14 0.01 0.11 0.03 c0.19 0.00 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.03 0.03 v/c Ratio 1.34 0.65 0.11 0.16 0.68 0.24 0.38 0.05 0.31 Uniform Delay, dl 52.4 42.6 37.4 39.4 46.9 48.3 18.3 14.7 24.2 Progression Factor 0.97 0.91 1.19 1.02 1.49 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.15 Incremental Delay, d2 167.9 2.5 0.0 0.1 2.5 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.3 Delay (s) 218.6 41.4 44.4 40.4 72.5 48.4 18.7 16.9 28.1 Level of Service F D D D E D B B C Approach Delay (s) 142.9 69.3 21.4 27.8 Approach LOS F E C C Intersection Surnma HCM 2000 Control Delay 69.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement SBR 4wonfgurations Volume (vph) 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, pedlbikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (oerm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 8/7/2015 ---* 10. 'r .- f, 4\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 0 tT+ M +0 ► ttt Volume (vph) 408 377 44 31 128 90 3 60 1326 22 35 571 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1725 3362 1750 3163 3439 5075 1773 5108 Flt Permitted 0.62 1.00 0.39 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1118 3362 727 3163 3439 5075 1773 5108 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 408 377 44 31 128 90 3 60 1326 22 35 571 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 70 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 408 413 0 31 148 0 0 63 1347 0 35 571 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 29 29 42 42 42 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 2 4 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 44.2 31.1 44.7 27.7 9.0 51.0 4.8 46.8 Effective Green, g (s) 42.2 30.1 42.7 26.7 9.0 51.0 4.8 46.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.25 0.36 0.22 0.08 0.42 0.04 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 471 843 366 703 257 2156 70 1992 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.02 c0.27 c0.02 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.49 0.08 0.21 0.25 0.62 0.50 0.29 Uniform Delay, dl 33.9 38.4 30.4 38.1 52.3 27.0 56.4 25.1 Progression Factor 1.30 1.00 1.41 1.50 0.71 0.46 1.14 1.42 Incremental Delay, d2 14.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.3 1.9 0.3 Delay (s) 58.7 38.4 42.8 57.3 37.3 13.7 66.3 36.1 Level of Service E D D E D B E D Approach Delay (s) 48.4 55.5 14.7 70.9 Approach LOS D E B E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 39.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/25/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 817/2015 Movement SBR i_++fonfigurations Volume (vph) 105 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1487 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1487 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 105 RTOR Reduction (vph) 65 Lane Group Flow (vph) 40 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% Bus Blockages #/hr) 4 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.8 Effective Green, g (s) 45.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 567 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.07 Uniform Delay, dl 23.6 Progression Factor 11.08 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s) 261.4 Level of Service F Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 8/7/2015 } --I. -'V 'r *-- it 4 I L* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT INBR NBU NSL NST NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 1 T A to Volume (vph) 6 5 3 31 8 42 8 15 1421 84 6 36 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1729 1660 1689 1508 1769 4979 1737 Fit Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1318 1660 1338 1508 1769 4979 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 5 3 31 8 42 8 15 1421 84 6 36 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 38 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 5 0 31 12 0 0 23 1502 0 0 42 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 14 14 19 19 19 25 25 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.1 9.4 13.1 11.9 4.2 79.0 8.9 Effective Green, g (s) 11.1 8.4 11.1 10.9 4.2 79.0 8.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.04 0.66 0.07 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 122 116 131 136 61 3277 128 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 0.00 c0.01 0.01 0.01 c0.30 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.02 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.04 0.24 0.09 0.38 0.46 0.33 Uniform Delay, d1 49.6 52.1 50.6 50.0 56.6 10.0 52.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.16 1.88 0.84 1.39 0.71 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.5 Delay (s) 49.7 52.1 59.1 94.2 48.6 14.2 37.7 Level of Service D D E F D B D Approach Delay (s) 51.1 80.8 14.7 Approach LOS D F B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 14.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 817/2015 # 4/ Movement SBT SBR LaQponfigurations ttlpl Volume (vph) 574 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5096 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5096 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 574 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 579 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr) 4 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 83.7 Effective Green, g (s) 83.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3554 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.16 Uniform Delay, dl 6.2 Progression Factor 0.25 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 1.7 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 4.1 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/7/2015 } Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU W8L VVBT WBR NStJ NSL NBT NBR Lane Configurations M ttT N) ttt r B) +fl� Volume (vph) 115 250 1536 10 4 140 479 137 5 107 1190 188 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3571 5255 3467 5081 1559 3377 4957 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 3571 5255 3467 5081 1559 3377 4957 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 115 250 1536 10 4 140 479 137 5 107 1190 188 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 18 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 365 1545 0 0 144 479 47 0 112 1360 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 35 35 15 15 15 24 24 24 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blocka4es (#/hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 42.9 9.3 41.2 41.2 8.1 39.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 42.9 9.3 41.2 41.2 8.1 39.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.36 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.07 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 312 1878 268 1744 535 227 1611 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 c0.29 c0.04 0.09 0.03 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 1.17 0.82 0.54 0.27 0.09 0.49 0.84 Uniform Delay, dl 54.8 35.1 53.3 28.6 26.7 54.0 37.7 Progression Factor 0.92 0.87 1.17 1.58 6.67 0.81 1.27 Incremental Delay, d2 104.3 4.1 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.5 4.6 Delay (s) 154.6 34.7 63.2 45.5 178.4 44.0 52.4 Level of Service F C E D F D D Approach Delay (s) 57.6 72.8 51.7 Approach LOS E E D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 55.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/7/2015 Movement L# SBU S9L � SBT 4/ SBR Lane Configurations M +f t r Volume (vph) 2 121 442 73 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1498 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3440 5136 1498 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 121 442 73 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 49 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 123 442 24 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 19 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.3 39.2 39.2 Effective Green, g (s) 8.3 39.2 39.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 237 1677 489 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 vlc Ratio 0.52 0.26 0.05 Uniform Delay, dl 53.9 29.8 27.6 Progression Factor 1.05 0.99 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.4 0.2 Delay (s) 57.6 30.0 27.8 Level of Service E C C Approach Delay (s) 35.1 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 8l7/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU N/BL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M ttl M W4 1 1� Volume (vph) 171 1641 68 19 8 726 48 9 5 3 37 14 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.89 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3402 4978 3318 4831 1703 1714 1707 1605 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.75 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3402 4978 3318 4831 1290 1714 1352 1605 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 171 1641 68 19 8 726 48 9 5 3 37 14 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 37 Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 1707 0 0 27 770 0 9 5 0 37 20 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 18 18 18 4 4 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.7 77.0 6.3 73.6 18.2 13.7 18.2 16.6 Effective Green, g (s) 9.7 77.0 6.3 73.6 17.2 13.2 17.2 16.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.64 0.05 0.61 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 274 3194 174 2963 188 188 205 215 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.34 0.01 c0.16 0.00 0.00 c0.01 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.02 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.53 0.16 0.26 0.05 0.03 0.18 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 53.4 11.7 54.3 10.7 44.3 47.7 45.0 45.5 Progression Factor 0.95 1.62 0.77 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.25 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 Delay (s) 52.6 19.4 41.9 6.0 44.4 47.7 45.5 56.8 Level of Service D B D A D D D E Approach Delay (s) 22.4 7.2 45.9 52.3 Approach LOS C A D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 81712015 4/ Movement SSR Lan4onfigurations Volume (vph) 43 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow iper m) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 AV S & S 320 St 8/7/2015 -,.* --p- -,* Ir 4--- 4\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M Wo )� ttT Vi t r T Volume (vph) 165 1347 25 166 824 159 32 332 435 363 99 68 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4901 3483 5087 1733 1735 1506 3359 1652 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3240 4901 3483 5087 1733 1735 1506 3359 1652 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 165 1347 25 166 824 159 32 332 435 363 99 68 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 22 0 0 0 38 0 23 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 165 1371 0 166 961 0 32 332 397 363 144 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 10 10 17 17 4 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages #/hr 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 4 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 45.9 10.5 45.9 13.6 27.4 37.9 16.2 30.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 45.9 10.5 45.9 13.1 26.9 37.9 15.7 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.38 0.09 0.38 0.11 0.22 0.32 0.13 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 283 1874 304 1945 189 388 544 439 406 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.28 0.05 0.19 0.02 c0.19 c0.06 c0.11 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.58 0.73 0.55 0.49 0.17 0.86 0.73 0.83 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 52.6 31.8 52.5 28.2 48.5 44.7 36.5 50.8 37.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.12 0.62 0.67 1.09 1.02 1.03 1.05 1.18 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 2.5 0.8 0.7 0.2 16.1 4.3 10.9 0.2 Delay (s) 54.5 38.0 33.2 19.5 53.3 61.7 42.1 64.2 44.3 Level of Service D D C B D E D E D Approach Delay (s) 39.8 21.5 50.7 57.9 Approach LOS D C D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 39.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: TC2 - 9/24/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/7/2015 --p. 4--- *-- it 41 t /00 I* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NST NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t r 1( ttT_' A Volume (vph) 157 252 26 125 45 11 26 51 1418 250 1 12 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1101 3375 1774 1773 4989 1730 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1812 1101 3375 1774 1773 4989 1730 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 157 252 26 125 45 11 26 51 1418 250 1 12 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 21 0 9 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 157 252 5 125 47 0 0 77 1653 0 0 13 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 16 16 9 9 9 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 0 8 72 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.8 23.8 23.8 8.4 16.4 7.9 65.2 2.6 Effective Green, g (s) 15.3 23.3 23.3 7.9 15.9 7.9 65.2 2.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.13 0.07 0.54 0.02 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 351 213 222 235 116 2710 37 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.14 0.04 0.03 c0.04 c0.33 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.72 0.02 0.56 0.20 0.66 0.61 0.35 Uniform Delay, d1 50.1 45.3 39.1 54.4 46.4 54.8 18.7 57.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.11 Incremental Delay, d2 7.3 5.7 0.0 1.9 0.2 10.5 1.0 2.0 Delay (s) 57.4 51.0 39.2 51.5 39.2 65.3 19.7 66.3 Level of Service E D D D D E B E Approach Delay (s) 52.6 47.7 21.8 Approach LOS D D C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 25.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 -Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/7/2015 Movement SBT SBR L.aneXonfigurations Wil Volume (vph) 510 63 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.98 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4989 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4989 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 510 63 RTOR Reduction (vph) 10 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 563 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 59.9 Effective Green, g (s) 59.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2490 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.23 Uniform Delay, dl 17.0 Progression Factor 0.42 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s) 7.3 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 8.7 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary 2025 No Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 Appendix C Future Action Geometries, Turning Movement Forecasts, and LOS Analysis Results HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St 8l7/2015 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W8R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations f t r +T4 + r 13 Volume (vph) 23 335 444 154 61 464 85 502 608 128 53 152 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3578 1489 1770 3390 3406 1855 1501 1782 1754 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1789 3578 1489 1770 3390 3406 1855 1501 1782 1754 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 23 335 444 154 61 464 85 502 608 128 53 152 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 97 0 12 0 0 0 84 0 18 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 358 444 57 61 537 0 502 608 44 53 226 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 0 1 2 0 0 4 1 4 1 2 2 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.1 45.3 45.3 7.1 24.3 21.4 40.9 40.9 6.7 26.2 Effective Green, g (s) 28.1 45.3 44.3 7.1 24.3 21.4 40.9 40.9 6.7 26.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.38 0.37 0.06 0.20 0.18 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 418 1350 549 104 686 607 632 511 99 382 vls Ratio Prot c0.20 0.12 0.03 c0.16 c0.15 c0.33 0.03 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.33 0.10 0.59 0.78 0.83 0.96 0.09 0.54 0.59 Uniform Delay, d1 44.0 26.5 24.8 55.0 45.3 47.5 38.8 26.9 55.1 42.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 15.2 0.7 0.4 5.3 8.7 8.6 26.3 0.0 2.8 1.6 Delay (s) 59.2 27.2 25.2 60.4 54.0 56.1 65.1 26.9 57.9 43.7 Level of Service E C C E D E E C E D Approach Delay (s) 38.9 54.7 57.5 46.3 Approach LOS D D E D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 50.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils272 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Militwy Rd S & S 272 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lan4onfigurations Volume (vph) 92 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 92 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: S Peasley C n Rd 8/7/2015 -.4 d Movement EEL ESR NBL NBT tBT SBR Lane Configurations VjVi r t t r Volume (vph) 522 641 478 1363 994 313 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 522 641 478 1363 994 313 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 228 0 0 0 47 Lane Group Flow (vph) 522 413 478 1363 994 266 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.0 26.0 16.0 84.0 63.0 63.0 Effective Green, g (s) 26.0 26.0 16.0 84.0 63.0 63.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.70 0.52 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 _ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 743 342 457 1304 978 831 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 0.14 c0.73 0.53 v/s Ratio Perm c0.26 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.70 1.21 1.05 1.05 1.02 0.32 Uniform Delay, d1 43.4 47.0 52.0 18.0 28.5 16.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.46 Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 117.8 54.6 37.6 19.3 0.3 Delay (s) 45.9 164.8 106.6 55.6 38.9 7.7 Level of Service D F F E D A Approach Delay (s) 111.4 68.9 31.4 Approach LOS F E C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 69.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/7/2015 --* -0. -'V f- fl L Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 41� *T r ttT31 A) Volume (vph) 91 103 6 216 6 305 1 7 2578 365 4 91 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1798 1694 1707 1569 1805 5022 3318 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1798 1694 1707 1569 1805 5022 3318 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 91 103 6 216 6 305 1 7 2578 365 4 91 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 265 0 0 10 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 200 0 110 112 40 0 8 2933 0 0 95 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 13 13 22 22 22 18 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr) 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.7 15.6 15.6 15.6 1.2 55.4 6.3 Effective Green, g (s) 19.7 15.6 15.6 15.6 1.7 55.9 6.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.01 0.47 0.06 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 295 220 221 203 25 2339 188 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.06 c0.07 0.00 c0.58 c0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.50 0.51 0.20 0.32 1.25 0.51 Uniform Delay, dl 47.2 48.6 48.6 46.6 58.6 32.0 55.0 Progression Factor 1.00 0.98 0.98 3.27 1.14 1.01 0.83 Incremental Delay, d2 4.8 0.6 0.7 0.2 2.7 117.9 0.7 Delay (s) 52.0 48.5 48.4 152.6 69.4 150.3 46.4 Level of Service D D D F E F D Approach Delay (s) 52.0 108.7 150.1 Approach LOS D F F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 121.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 113.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/01/2014 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/7/2015 4 Movement SBT SBR Larjjl�onfigvrations +0 Volume (vph) 524 24 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4974 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4974 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 524 24 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 546 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 60.5 Effective Green, g (s) 61.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2528 vls Ratio Prot c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.22 Uniform Delay, dl 16.3 Progression Factor 0.97 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s) 16.0 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 20.4 Approach LOS C intersection Summary 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 81712015 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 8/7/2015 -)V 'r 4--- II i 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR W8L VVBT WBR NBi_ NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 '� '� �` + Volume (vph) 215 468 52 75 194 214 175 495 171 105 218 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 3457 1716 3008 1746 1784 1462 1795 1846 1521 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1824 3457 1716 3008 1036 1784 1462 436 1846 1521 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 215 468 52 75 194 214 175 495 171 105 218 69 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 184 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 215 513 0 75 224 0 175 495 71 105 218 69 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 6 6 20 20 35 35 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.4 23.0 6.7 12.3 36.6 31.0 31.0 36.6 27.9 45.3 Effective Green, g (s) 17.4 23.0 6.7 12.3 36.6 31.0 31.0 36.6 27.9 45.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.26 0.08 0.14 0.42 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.32 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 365 916 132 426 508 637 522 271 593 793 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.15 0.04 c0.07 c0.03 c0.28 0.02 0.12 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.05 0.14 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.56 0.57 0.53 0.34 0.78 0.14 0.39 0.37 0.09 Uniform Delay, d1 31.5 27.5 38.7 34.5 16.2 24.8 18.9 17.1 22.7 10.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 0.4 3.3 0.5 0.1 5.4 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 33.0 28.0 42.0 35.1 16.3 30.2 18.9 17.5 22.8 10.4 Level of Service C C D D B C B B C B Approach Delay (s) 29.4 36.2 25.0 19.2 Approach LOS C D C B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.8 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/01/2014 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 8/7/2015 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St 8/7/2015 Movement EBL EBT FBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST Lane Configurations I +11� �*I tT I + till, Volume (vph) 361 538 81 37 110 200 19 56 372 618 79 282 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 3% 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1743 3383 3366 3448 1789 1900 1579 1740 3376 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1743 3383 346 3448 800 1900 1579 375 3376 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 361 538 81 37 110 200 19 56 372 618 79 282 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 56 0 19 Lane Group Flow (vph) 361 609 0 0 147 213 0 56 372 562 79 337 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 10 8 8 2 2 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 6 0 6 2 0 2 0 4 4 6 Turn Type Prot NA custom Prot NA D.P+P NA pm+ov D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5! 3 8 Permitted Phases 5! 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.9 23.2 41.0 35.3 36.8 29.8 70.8 36.8 28.8 Effective Green, g (s) 28.9 23.2 41.0 35.3 36.8 29.8 70.8 36.8 28.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.19 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.25 0.59 0.31 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 419 654 118 1014 311 471 997 194 810 v/s Ratio Prot 0.21 c0.18 0.06 0.01 c0.20 0.19 0.02 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm c0.43 0.04 0.16 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.93 1.25 0.21 0.18 0.79 0.56 0.41 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 43.6 47.6 39.5 31.9 35.2 42.2 15.1 31.8 38.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.43 1.37 Incremental Delay, d2 15.9 19.9 163.0 0.0 0.1 12.7 0.4 0.4 1.1 Delay (s) 59.6 67.5 202.5 31.9 35.3 54.8 15.6 45.9 53.8 Level of Service E E F C D D B D D Approach Delay (s) 64.6 100.4 30.6 52.3 Approach LOS E F C D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 54.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: All Traffic Data - May 2, 2012 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement SBR LaWon#igurations Volume (vph) 74 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 74 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Su 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St c Critical Lane Group 8/7/2015 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 SUS 320 St 8/7/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r ft r ft r tt r Volume (vph) 0 1384 242 0 337 183 0 549 436 0 355 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3457 1538 3535 1584 3592 1560 3556 1513 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3457 1538 3535 1584 3592 1560 3556 1513 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1384 242 0 337 183 0 549 436 0 355 125 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 94 0 0 70 0 0 22 0 0 84 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1384 148 0 337 113 0 549 414 0 355 41 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockaaes Whrl 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 71.6 71.6 71.1 71.1 38.9 38.9 39.4 39.4 Effective Green, g (s) 71.6 70.6 71.1 71.1 38.9 38.9 39.4 39.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2062 904 2094 938 1164 505 1167 496 v/s Ratio Prot c0.40 0.10 0.15 0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.07 c0.27 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.47 0.82 0.30 0.08 Uniform Delay, dl 16.3 11.2 11.0 10.7 32.4 37.3 30.1 27.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.49 3.45 0.87 0.88 1.49 4.12 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 9.7 0.1 0.0 Delay (s) 18.0 11.6 16.6 37.3 28.3 42.5 44.9 114.6 Level of Service B B B D C D D F Approach Delay (s) 17.1 23.9 34.6 63.1 Approach LOS B C C E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 29.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/15/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St 8/7/2I015 Movement EBL EBT EBR W8U WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR ":'BL SBT Lane Configurations ttt r* ) ttt Vi 4 Volume (vph) 0 1739 450 2 199 946 0 0 0 0 120 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1509 1758 5122 1667 1688 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 5046 1509 1758 5122 1667 1688 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1739 450 2 199 946 0 0 0 0 120 2 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1739 255 0 201 946 0 0 0 0 61 61 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 10 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 4 0 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot Prot NA Split NA Protected Phases 2 1 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 68.1 68.1 27.0 90.1 9.9 9.9 Effective Green, g (s) 68.1 68.1 27.0 90.1 9.9 9.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.57 0.22 0.75 0.08 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2863 856 395 3845 137 139 v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 c0.11 0.18 c0.04 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.30 0.51 0.25 0.45 0.44 Uniform Delay, d1 17.1 13.5 40.7 4.6 52.4 52.4 Progression Factor 1.48 6.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.8 Delay (s) 26.2 86.3 41.1 4.7 53.3 53.2 Level of Service C F D A D D Approach Delay (s) 38.6 11.1 0.0 45.6 Approach LOS D B A D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St 81712015 4/ Movement SBR Lan4onfigurations W Volume (vph) 419 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3600 Fit Permitted 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 3600 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 419 RTOR Reduction (vph) 291 Lane Group Flow (vph) 128 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type custom Protected Phases 45 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 19.9 Effective Green, g (s) 19.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) 597 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.21 Uniform Delay, dl 43.3 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 43.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Interse wore Srnunary 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps/1-5 NB Ramp & S 320 St 8/712015 --.* --p- --v Ir .- t -V Movement ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r tO Vi 4 r Volume (vph) 0 685 1004 0 815 422 282 1 725 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 2% 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1575 4833 1651 1669 1533 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1575 4833 1651 1669 1533 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 685 1004 0 815 422 282 1 725 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 70 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 685 1004 0 1167 0 141 142 699 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (Nhr) 2 2 1 1 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 44.7 120.0 44.7 65.3 65.3 65.3 Effective Green, g (s) 44.7 120.0 44.7 65.3 65.3 64.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 1.00 0.37 0.54 0.54 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1879 1575 1800 898 908 821 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 0.24 0.09 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm c0.64 c0.46 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.64 0.65 0.16 0.16 0.85 Uniform Delay, d1 27.3 0.0 31.1 13.6 13.6 23.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.05 1.05 1.04 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 2.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 8.2 Delay (s) 27.9 2.0 31.7 14.3 14.3 33.0 Level of Service C A C B B C Approach Delay (s) 12.5 31.7 27.8 0.0 Approach LOS B C C A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 St/S Peasley C n Rd 8/7/2015 --* --,N. *-- 4-- 4\ .1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT Vh1BR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations tt r fly t F t r Volume (vph) 217 1027 57 21 644 88 318 536 100 138 157 181 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 1529 1770 3431 1755 1863 1512 1755 1863 1512 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3525 1529 1770 3431 1755 1863 1512 1755 1863 1512 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 217 1027 57 21 644 88 318 536 100 138 157 181 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 19 0 9 0 0 0 69 0 0 161 Lane Group Flow (vph) 217 1027 38 21 723 0 318 536 31 138 157 20 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockades (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.9 45.8 82.5 4.0 32.9 36.7 36.7 36.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.9 45.8 80.5 4.0 32.9 36.7 36.7 36.7 13.5 13.5 13.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.38 0.67 0.03 0.27 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 249 1345 1102 59 940 536 569 462 197 209 170 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.29 0.01 0.01 c0.21 0.18 c0.29 0.08 c0.08 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.76 0.03 0.36 0.77 0.59 0.94 0.07 0.70 0.75 0.12 Uniform Delay, dl 50.5 32.4 6.7 56.7 40.1 35.3 40.6 29.5 51.3 51.6 47.9 Progression Factor 1.35 1.17 3.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 22.5 3.5 0.0 1.3 6.0 1.2 23.9 0.0 8.8 12.6 0.1 Delay (s) 90.5 41.4 21.8 58.1 46.1 36.5 64.5 29.5 60.1 64.2 48.0 Level of Service F D C E D D E C E E D Approach Delay (s) 48.7 46.4 51.5 56.9 Approach LOS D D D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 50.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils320 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/712015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NSL NBT NBR SBU. SBL SBT Lane Configurations t r Vi ti� M W, ttt Volume (vph) 313 365 137 64 292 48 330 1433 107 8 34 562 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 1% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1733 1872 1539 1749 3458 3401 4956 1796 5134 Fit Permitted 0.44 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.Flow (perm) 804 1872 1539 437 3458 3401 4956 1796 5134 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 313 365 137 64 292 48 330 1433 107 8 34 562 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 102 0 13 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 313 365 35 64 327 0 330 1535 0 0 42 562 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 7 7 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 4 4 2 6 2 6 0 6 0 4 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot NA Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 35.9 30.6 30.6 35.9 25.4 15.4 56.0 7.6 48.2 Effective Green, g (s) 35.9 30.6 30.6 35.9 25.4 15.4 56.0 7.6 48.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.26 0.26 0.30 0.21 0.13 0.47 0.06 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 321 477 392 188 731 436 2312 113 2062 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.20 0.01 0.09 0.10 c0.31 c0.02 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.02 0.09 vlc Ratio 0.98 0.77 0.09 0.34 0.45 0.76 0.66 0.37 0.27 Uniform Delay, dl 39.6 41.4 34.1 45.7 41.2 50.5 24.7 53.9 24.1 Progression Factor 1.14 1.06 3.42 1.12 1.02 1.10 1.44 1.01 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 41.8 6.2 0.0 0.4 0.1 6.4 1.5 0.8 0.3 Delay (s) 86.7 50.1 116.5 51.5 42.3 62.1 37.2 55.1 24.6 Level of Service F D F D D E D E C Approach Delay (s) 75.3 43.8 41.6 24.2 Approach LOS E D D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 45.3 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/18/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 ICU Level of Service E 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement SBR L4nKonfigur@tions r Volume (vph) 198 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fit 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1572 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1572 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 198 RTOR Reduction (vph) 101 Lane Group Flow (vph) 97 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type pm+ov Protected Phases 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 58.7 Effective Green, g (s) 58.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 768 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.13 Uniform Delay, dl 16.7 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 Delay (s) 16.7 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/712015 2b ---► it #1 I * o Movement EBU. EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations , +0 )) tO �) ttT_ r M Volume (vph) 6 68 1222 103 423 832 101 2 197 707 762 71 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 1 % 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 4968 3369 4916 3264 4345 1294 3485 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1737 4968 3369 4916 1863 4345 1294 3485 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 68 1222 103 423 832 101 2 197 707 762 71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 11 0 0 0 87 42 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 74 1318 0 423 922 0 0 199 1001 339 71 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 10 3 3 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 2% 5% 5% 5% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 Permitted Phases 5 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.0 48.0 8.9 51.4 21.6 37.1 46.0 5.5 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 48.0 8.9 51.4 21.6 37.1 46.0 5.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.40 0.07 0.43 0.18 0.31 0.38 0.05 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 86 1987 249 2105 335 1343 496 159 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.27 c0.13 0.19 c0.23 0.05 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.66 1.70 0.44 0.59 0.75 0.68 0.45 Uniform Delay, d1 56.6 29.4 55.5 24.1 45.2 37.2 30.9 55.8 Progression Factor 0.84 0.87 0.63 1.06 1.30 1.42 1.62 0.71 Incremental Delay, d2 47.6 1.5 316.0 0.1 1.6 1.7 2.6 0.7 Delay (s) 95.4 27.0 350.9 25.6 60.2 54.3 52.5 40.6 Level of Service F C F C E D D D Approach Delay (s) 30.7 127.0 54.6 Approach LOS C F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 66.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/11/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 19 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/7/2015 4 Movement SBT SBR Lar Nonfigurations tt'T Volume (vph) 263 72 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.97 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4967 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4967 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 263 72 RTOR Reduction (vph) 51 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 284 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 869 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.33 Uniform Delay, dl 43.3 Progression Factor 0.95 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 41.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 41.3 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 20 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 817/2015 -► --v 'r .- 4\ l* \*� 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL INBT WBR NBL NBT NSR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations t r tT 91 tO ) W�' Volume (vph) 597 271 174 41 383 30 88 873 39 3 11 567 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3470 1891 1594 1764 3515 3240 4756 1759 4921 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.25 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3470 1891 1594 703 3515 3240 4756 467 4921 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 597 271 174 41 383 30 88 873 39 3 11 567 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 130 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 0 15 Lane Group Flow (vph) 597 271 44 41 407 0 88 909 0 0 14 642 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% 2% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot NA custom D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 1 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.4 30.2 30.2 37.7 20.3 12.8 58.1 60.3 47.5 Effective Green, g (s) 16.4 30.2 30.2 37.7 20.3 13.8 59.1 60.3 47.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.25 0.25 0.31 0.17 0.12 0.49 0.50 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 474 475 401 287 594 372 2342 258 1947 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.14 0.01 c0.12 0.03 c0.19 0.00 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.04 0.03 v/c Ratio 1.26 0.57 0.11 0.14 0.69 0.24 0.39 0.05 0.33 Uniform Delay, dl 51.8 39.2 34.5 37.6 46.8 48.3 19.1 15.3 25.2 Progression Factor 0.97 0.92 1.19 1.02 1.49 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.14 Incremental Delay, d2 131.3 0.9 0.0 0.1 2.6 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.4 Delay (s) 181.5 37.2 41.2 38.3 72.5 48.4 19.6 17.6 29.0 Level of Service F D D D E D B B C Approach Delay (s) 120.5 69.4 22.1 28.8 Approach LOS F E C C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 62.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 8l7/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lt onfigurations Volume (vph) 90 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 90 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 8/7/2015 fl t 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL 'NET `.'VBI~ NEE NBL NBT N2R GD� GBT Lane Configurations 0 t'+ A) tfl� A +t+ Volume (vph) 432 365 44 36 144 86 3 56 1303 30 42 580 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1725 3360 1749 3187 3439 5068 1773 5108 Fit Permitted 0.61 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1102 3360 758 3187 3439 5068 1773 5108 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 432 365 44 36 144 86 3 56 1303 30 42 580 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 65 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 432 400 0 36 165 0 0 59 1331 0 42 580 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 29 29 42 42 42 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 2 4 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.2 32.0 46.7 29.7 8.0 47.5 6.3 45.8 Effective Green, g (s) 44.2 31.0 44.7 28.7 8.0 47.5 6.3 45.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.26 0.37 0.24 0.07 0.40 0.05 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 486 868 395 762 229 2006 93 1949 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.02 c0.26 c0.02 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.46 0.09 0.22 0.26 0.66 0.45 0.30 Uniform Delay, dl 33.1 37.5 28.7 36.6 53.2 29.7 55.2 25.9 Progression Factor 1.28 0.96 1.39 1.44 0.71 0.52 1.16 1.41 Incremental Delay, d2 17.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.6 1.2 0.4 Delay (s) 59.3 36.0 39.8 52.7 37.9 17.0 65.2 36.7 Level of Service E D D D D B E D Approach Delay (s) 48.0 50.9 17.9 61.7 Approach LOS D D B E Intersection Surnm2.ry HCM 2000 Control Delay 38.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/25/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement SBR Lonfigurations Volume (vph) 119 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1487 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1487 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 119 RTOR Reduction (vph) 75 Lane Group Flow (vph) 44 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% Bus Blockaqes (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.8 Effective Green, g (s) 44.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 555 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.08 Uniform Delay, dl 24.3 Progression Factor 7.50 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 Delay (s) 182.3 Level of Service F Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St * 8/7/2015 --o, it I' Movement EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 14 T.) Zi ttll� A Volume (vph) 6 5 3 51 8 64 8 15 1393 118 9 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1731 1660 1689 1493 1769 4954 1737 Flt Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1294 1660 1338 1493 1769 4954 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 5 3 51 8 64 8 15 1393 118 9 40 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 58 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 5 0 51 14 0 0 23 1506 0 0 49 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 14 14 19 19 19 25 25 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 13.4 8.6 13.4 12.2 4.2 78.8 8.8 Effective Green, g (s) 11.4 7.6 11.4 11.2 4.2 78.8 8.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.06 0.10 0.09 0.04 0.66 0.07 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 123 105 138 139 61 3253 127 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 0.00 c0.01 0.01 0.01 c0.30 c0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.02 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.05 0.37 0.10 0.38 0.46 0.39 Uniform Delay, d1 49.4 52.8 51.1 49.8 56.6 10.2 53.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.15 2.05 0.82 1.43 0.69 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.7 Delay (s) 49.4 52.9 59.5 102.3 47.1 14.7 37.3 Level of Service D D E F D B D Approach Delay (s) 51.4 84.6 15.2 Approach LOS D F B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 8/7/2015 i 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lanelponfig u rations tti� Volume (vph) 571 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5096 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5096 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 571 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 576 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 Turn Type NA _ Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 83.4 Effective Green, g (s) 83.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3541 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 6.3 Progression Factor 0.26 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 Delay (s) 1.7 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 4.5 Approach LOS A Intersection 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/712015 � � � �► '~ � it � � 7* Movement EBU EBL EFT EEF. AB! i WBL WBT INBR NEE i.BL NET NBR Lane Configurations M W4 9) ttt r M +0 Volume (vph) 118 283 1523 10 1 170 489 137 5 99 1171 238 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3571 5255 3467 5081 1559 3377 4927 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3571 5255 3467 5081 1559 3377 4927 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 118 283 1523 10 1 170 489 137 5 99 1171 238 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 90 0 0 26 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 401 1532 0 0 171 489 47 0 104 1383 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 35 35 15 15 15 24 24 24 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 41.8 10.2 41.0 41.0 7.9 39.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 41.8 10.2 41.0 41.0 7.9 39.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.35 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.07 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 312 1830 294 1736 532 222 1601 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 c0.29 c0.05 0.10 0.03 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 1.29 0.84 0.58 0.28 0.09 0.47 0.86 Uniform Delay, d1 54.8 36.0 52.8 28.8 26.8 54.0 38.0 Progression Factor 0.92 0.88 1.18 1.62 7.08 0.80 1.26 Incremental Delay, d2 149.7 4.6 1.9 0.4 0.3 0.5 5.3 Delay (s) 200.1 36.1 64.1 46.9 190.1 43.7 53.4 Level of Service F D E D F D D Approach Delay (s) 70.1 75.2 52.7 Approach LOS E E D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 60.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/7/2015 I* \J' � 4/ Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations �) ttt Volume (vph) 4 127 449 71 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1498 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3440 5136 1498 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 127 449 71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 48 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 131 449 23 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 19 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.5 39.6 39.6 Effective Green, g (s) 8.5 39.6 39.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 1694 494 v/s Ratio Prot c0.04 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.27 0.05 Uniform Delay, dl 53.9 29.5 27.4 Progression Factor 1.02 0.95 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.4 0.2 Delay (s) 56.3 28.5 27.5 Level of Service E C C Approach Delay (s) 34.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 8/7/2015 ---* --p- (F, f- 4\ T Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU 1N8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST Lane Configurations�� Volume (vph) 216 1659 45 30 10 762 58 8 4 2 44 12 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.88 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3402 4989 3318 4823 1703 1727 1707 1589 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.75 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3402 4989 3318 4823 1286 1727 1355 1589 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 216 1659 45 30 10 762 58 8 4 2 44 12 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 42 Lane Group Flow (vph) 216 1702 0 0 40 815 0 8 4 0 44 19 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 18 18 18 4 4 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 74.4 8.4 72.4 18.7 12.6 18.7 17.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 74.4 8.4 72.4 17.7 12.1 17.7 16.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.62 0.07 0.60 0.15 0.10 0.15 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 294 3093 232 2909 193 174 216 218 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.34 0.01 c0.17 0.00 0.00 c0.01 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.02 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.55 0.17 0.28 0.04 0.02 0.20 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 53.5 13.2 52.5 11.4 43.9 48.6 44.8 45.2 Progression Factor 0.94 1.72 0.76 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.29 Incremental Delay, d2 4.7 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 Delay (s) 55.0 23.0 40.2 6.3 43.9 48.6 45.7 58.4 Level of Service E C D A D D D E Approach Delay (s) 26.6 7.9 45.9 53.1 Approach LOS C A D D Intersection Stemma HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 8/7/2015 4/ Movement SBR LanEWonfig u rations Volume (vph) 49 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 49 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 8/7/2015 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M ++Tl )) +0 Vi T r T Volume (vph) 136 1382 23 158 849 210 36 333 398 446 99 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4903 3483 5054 1733 1735 1506 3359 1640 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3240 4903 3483 5054 1733 1735 1506 3359 1640 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 136 1382 23 158 849 210 36 333 398 446 99 81 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 32 0 0 0 38 0 28 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 136 1404 0 158 1027 0 36 333 360 446 152 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 10 10 17 17 4 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 4 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 45.8 10.5 45.8 13.4 27.4 37.9 16.3 30.3 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 45.8 10.5 45.8 12.9 26.9 37.9 15.8 29.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.38 0.09 0.38 0.11 0.22 0.32 0.13 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 283 1871 304 1928 186 388 0.04 c0.29 0.05 0.20 0.02 c0.19 0.48 0.75 0.52 0.53 0.19 0.86 52.2 32.1 52.3 28.8 48.8 44.7 0.96 1.07 0.61 0.61 1.10 1.02 0.5 2.7 0.5 0.8 0.2 16.3 50.6 37.0 32.5 18.4 53.8 62.1 D D C B D E 38.2 20.2 49.9 D C D HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) Description: TC2 - 9/24/2014 c Critical Lane Group 41.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service 0.83 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 84.9% ICU Level of Service 15 544 442 407 c0.06 c0.13 0.09 0.18 0.66 1.01 0.37 35.5 52.1 37.4 1.04 1.04 1.19 2.3 43.8 0.2 39.2 97.9 44.7 D F D 82.6 F u 21.0 E 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/7/2015 -11 --,1. -,;t a-- fl t L* i uvcrient EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT 1NBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations ►j t r 1, ttl, A Volume (vph) 160 247 25 121 45 11 26 44 1420 256 1 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1101 3375 1774 1773 4986 1730 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1812 1101 3375 1774 1773 4986 1730 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 160 247 25 121 45 11 26 44 1420 256 1 16 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 20 0 9 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 160 247 5 121 47 0 0 70 1660 0 0 17 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 16 16 9 9 9 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 8 72 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.8 23.7 23.7 8.3 16.2 7.6 65.2 2.8 Effective Green, g (s) 15.3 23.2 23.2 7.8 15.7 7.6 65.2 2.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.13 0.06 0.54 0.02 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 350 212 219 232 112 2709 _ 40 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.14 0.04 0.03 c0.04 c0.33 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.02 0.55 0.20 0.62 0.61 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 50.2 45.2 39.2 54.4 46.6 54.8 18.8 57.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.13 Incremental Delay, d2 8.0 5.2 0.0 1.7 0.2 7.6 1.0 2.5 Delay (s) 58.2 50.4 39.2 51.4 39.1 62.4 19.8 67.9 Level of Service E D D D D E B E Approach Delay (s) 52.7 47.5 21.5 Approach LOS D D C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 24.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 -Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/7/2015 4 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lane)�onfiguralicns ++I* Volume (vph) 546 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.98 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4994 At Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (berm) 4994 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 546 64 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 601 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 60.4 Effective Green, g (s) 60.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2513 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.24 Uniform Delay, dl 16.8 Progression Factor 0.39 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 Delay (s) 6.7 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 8.4 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary 2025 Action AM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 8/6/2015 'r 4--- 4" it t L* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations tT tT) M tti Volume (vph) 263 434 143 155 624 181 29 250 864 70 76 134 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1735 3275 1755 3279 3439 5000 1773 Fit Permitted 0.11 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 200 3275 435 3279 3439 5000 1773 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 263 434 143 155 624 181 29 250 864 70 76 134 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 25 0 0 19 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 263 552 0 155 786 0 0 279 928 0 0 210 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 29 29 42 42 42 29 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 6 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 56.8 34.9 57.3 37.5 14.0 43.0 20.2 Effective Green, g (s) 54.8 33.9 55.3 36.5 14.0 43.0 20.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.24 0.39 0.26 0.10 0.31 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 793 373 854 343 1535 255 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.17 0.06 0.24 c0.08 0.19 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.70 0.42 0.92 0.81 0.60 0.82 Uniform Delay, dl 40.5 48.4 42.7 50.3 61.7 41.3 58.2 Progression Factor 0.98 1.06 1.21 1.13 0.59 0.38 1.27 Incremental Delay, d2 38.7 2.1 0.3 14.7 11.6 1.6 17.7 Delay (s) 78.4 53.5 52.0 71.7 47.8 17.3 91.3 Level of Service E D D E D B F Approach Delay (s) 61.3 68.6 24.3 Approach LOS E E C Intersection Scmma HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/25/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S.& S 312 St _ 8/6/2015 Movement SBT SBR LaneSorifigurations ttt r Volume (vph) 1486 472 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5108 1476 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5108 1476 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1486 472 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 220 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1486 252 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 49.2 49.2 Effective Green, g (s) 49.2 48.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.34 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1795 508 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.50 Uniform Delay, dl 41.5 36.3 Progression Factor 1.13 1.94 Incremental Delay, d2 4.4 3.3 Delay (s) 51.4 73.9 Level of Service D E Approach Delay (s) 60.2 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 816/2015 -1, --,, --v it } I► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 1� T, ttT, Volume (vph) 71 58 98 199 78 127 79 201 1114 131 46 104 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1749 1573 1696 1572 1769 4918 1737 Flt Permitted 0.38 1.00 0.54 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 694 1573 966 1572 1769 4918 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 71 58 98 199 78 127 79 201 1114 131 46 104 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 45 0 0 47 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 71 111 0 199 158 0 0 280 1236 0 0 150 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 14 14 19 19 19 25 25 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 34.3 27.7 34.3 22.7 24.5 67.7 19.0 Effective Green, g (s) 32.3 26.7 32.3 21.7 24.5 67.7 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.19 0.23 0.15 0.18 0.48 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 239 299 252 243 _ 309 2378 235 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 0.07 c0.03 0.10 c0.16 0.25 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.15 vlc Ratio 0.30 0.37 0.79 0.65 0.91 0.52 0.64 Uniform Delay, dl 51.6 49.3 54.1 55.6 56.6 24.9 57.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.72 0.83 1.59 0.69 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.3 13.9 4.4 19.7 0.5 2.8 Delay (s) 51.8 49.6 51.2 44.6 66.7 40.0 42.5 Level of Service D D D D E D D Approach Delay (s) 50.3 47.9 44.9 Approach LOS D D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 33.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 8l6/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR LaneNonfigurations t+T* Volume (vph) 1709 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5069 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5069 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1709 54 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1761 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 62.2 Effective Green, g (s) 62.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2252 v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 Uniform Delay, dl 33.1 Progression Factor 0.48 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 Delay (s) 17.8 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 19.7 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 816/2015 :n --1' r► it t Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations M ftll� M W M ttl� Volume (vph) 83 404 1035 63 4 447 1639 213 24 190 812 337 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3571 5201 3467 5081 1555 3377 4807 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3571 5201 3467 5081 1555 3377 4807 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 404 1035 63 4 447 1639 213 24 190 812 337 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 92 0 0 53 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 487 1093 0 0 451 1639 121 0 214 1096 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 35 35 15 15 15 24 24 24 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages L#/hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 44.5 21.2 45.7 45.7 12.4 39.0 Effective Green, g (s) 19.5 44.5 21.2 45.7 45.7 12.4 39.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.32 0.15 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 497 1653 525 1658 507 299 1339 vls Ratio Prot c0.14 0.21 0.13 c0.32 0.06 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 vlc Ratio 0.98 0.66 0.86 0.99 0.24 0.72 0.82 Uniform Delay, dl 60.1 41.2 57.9 46.9 34.5 62.1 47.2 Progression Factor 0.82 0.73 1.24 1.39 2.44 0.73 1.18 Incremental Delay, d2 33.4 2.0 8.7 15.3 0.7 4.8 4.1 Delay (s) 82.4 32.2 80.8 80.4 84.8 50.0 59.8 Level of Service F C F F F D E Approach Delay (s) 47.6 80.9 58.3 Approach LOS D F E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 60.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 Movement L* SITU 09L SBT SSR Lane Configurations M +tt r Volume (vph) 22 307 1336 353 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1493 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3440 5136 1493 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 22 307 1336 353 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 99 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 329 1336 254 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 19 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #Ihr 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.8 41.4 41.4 Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 41.4 41.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 363 1518 441 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.88 0.58 Uniform Delay, dl 61.9 46.9 41.9 Progression Factor 0.88 0.85 0.92 Incremental Delay, d2 17.7 5.1 3.5 Delay (s) 72.2 45.0 42.1 Level of Service E D D Approach Delay (s) 48.9 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 t � q IQ 10� Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU _ WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations A) ttT M ttT 1� Volume (vph) 8 306 1246 74 32 106 1811 112 129 83 64 205 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% _1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3402 4963 3318 4833 1708 1695 1715 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.51 Satd. Flow (perm) 3402 4963 3318 4833 281 1695 913 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 8 306 1246 74 32 106 1811 112 129 83 64 205 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 22 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 314 1316 0 0 138 1919 0 129 125 0 205 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 7 18 18 18 4 4 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.3 76.2 10.5 71.4 34.8 23.3 34.8 Effective Green, g (s) 15.3 76.2 10.5 71.4 33.8 22.8 33.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.54 0.08 0.51 0.24 0.16 0.24 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 371 2701 248 2464 151 276 283 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.27 0.04 c0.40 0.05 0.07 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 c0.12 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.49 0.56 0.78 0.85 0.45 0.72 Uniform Delay, d1 61.2 19.8 62.5 27.9 61.9 53.0 47.2 Progression Factor 1.02 1.14 0.71 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.05 Incremental Delay, d2 10.8 0.4 1.1 1.9 33.7 0.4 7.5 Delay (s) 73.3 22.9 45.5 13.5 95.6 53.4 57.3 Level of Service E C D B F D E Approach Delay (s) 32.6 15.7 73.1 Approach LOS C B E Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320I St 8/6/2015 t � Movement SBT SBR Lanev+'onfigurations TO Volume (vph) 81 271 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 0.88 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1597 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1597 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 271 RTOR Reduction (vph) 92 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 26.1 Effective Green, g (s) 25.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 292 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.89 Uniform Delay, dl 55.9 Progression Factor 0.94 Incremental Delay, d2 26.4 Delay (s) 78.7 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) 70.8 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 2§ --* --1' ---t %< ,I- 4\ Movement TABU EBL EBT EER. 'W61- WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations A) M* )� W4 t r M T Volume (vph) 7 247 1230 57 649 1610 361 73 189 277 581 364 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4874 3483 5066 1733 1735 1514 3359 1681 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm)_3240 4874 3483 5066 1733 1735 1514 3359 1681 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 247 1230 57 649 1610 361 73 189 277 581 364 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 24 0 0 0 58 0 12 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 254 1283 0 649 1947 0 73 189 219 581 513 Confl. Peds. (Whr) 25 25 25 10 10 17 17 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 40.3 25.5 55.3 9.1 24.1 49.6 30.1 45.1 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 40.3 25.5 55.3 8.6 23.6 49.6 29.6 44.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.29 0.18 0.39 0.06 0.17 0.35 0.21 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 1403 634 2001 106 292 595 710 535 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.26 c0.19 c0.38 0.04 0.11 0.07 c0.17 c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 v/c Ratio 1.05 0.91 1.02 0.97 0.69 0.65 0.37 0.82 0.96 Uniform Delay, d1 64.8 48.2 57.2 41.6 64.4 54.3 33.6 52.6 46.8 Progression Factor 1.01 0.92 0.77 0.79 1.21 0.99 0.96 1.09 1.06 Incremental Delay, d2 69.0 10.4 40.2 13.8 13.7 3.7 0.1 6.8 28.0 Delay (s) 134.4 54.8 84.2 46.8 91.8 57.3 32.5 64.3 77.5 Level of Service F D F D F E C E E Approach Delay (s) 68.0 56.1 49.2 70.6 Approach LOS E E D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 61.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: TC2 - 9/24/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 I/ Movement SBR La n4Config u rations Volume (vph) 161 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, pedlbikes Flpb, pedlbikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) At Permitted Satd. Flow (germ) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 161 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Su 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/6/2015 --* --I. ■-- it1 7 L* �► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL VV8T VVBR NBU NBL HST NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations T r '� 1� A ttll� I Volume (vph) 130 190 134 615 309 26 162 165 1233 228 49 136 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1097 3375 1813 1773 4980 1730 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm)_1778 1812 1097 3375 1813 1773 4980 1730 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 130 190 134 615 309 26 162 165 1233 228 49 136 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 76 0 2 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 130 190 58 615 333 0 0 327 1445 0 0 185 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 16 16 9 9 9 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 72 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.1 22.3 22.3 23.0 31.2 21.0 58.3 16.4 Effective Green, g (s) 13.6 21.8 21.8 22.5 30.7 21.0 58.3 16.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.22 0.15 0.42 0.12 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 172 282 170 542 397 265 2073 202 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.10 c0.18 c0.18 c0.18 c0.29 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.67 0.34 1.13 0.84 1.23 0.70 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 61.6 55.7 52.7 58.8 52.3 59.5 33.6 61.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.38 Incremental Delay, d2 15.3 4.9 0.4 81.4 13.7 133.5 2.0 25.8 Delay (s) 76.9 60.7 53.1 130.7 65.3 193.0 35.6 110.4 Level of Service E E D F E F D F Approach Delay (s) 63.1 107.6 64.4 Approach LOS E F E Inter5ectian Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 59.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 -Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/6/2015 t Movement SBT SBR Lan4onfgurations tt'. Volume (vph) 1424 310 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 0.97 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4920 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4920 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1424 310 RTOR Reduction (vph) 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1712 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 53.7 Effective Green, g (s) 53.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1887 v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.91 Uniform Delay, d1 40.8 Progression Factor 0.41 Incremental Delay, d2 4.5 Delay (s) 21.2 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 29.8 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 30: ♦ I 8/6/2015 IQ I # Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 T 1 1� Volume (vph) 10 361 54 302 186 62 33 299 124 32 803 179 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1826 1770 1793 1770 1781 1770 1812 Fit Permitted 0.61 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.39 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1127 1826 201 1793 107 1781 729 1812 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 10 361 54 302 186 62 33 299 124 32 803 179 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 7 0 0 10 0 0 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 411 0 302 241 0 33 413 0 32 976 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.2 32.0 52.0 45.8 73.0 69.4 73.0 69.4 Effective Green, g (s) 33.2 32.0 52.0 45.8 73.0 69.4 73.0 69.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.23 0.37 0.33 0.52 0.50 0.52 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 272 417 242 586 98 882 406 898 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.23 c0.13 0.13 c0.01 0.23 0.00 c0.54 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.33 0.17 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.99 1.25 0.41 0.34 0.47 0.08 1.09 Uniform Delay, dl 41.0 53.8 41.0 36.6 31.9 23.2 17.4 35.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.76 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 39.9 141.2 0.2 0.6 1.6 0.0 56.6 Delay (s) 41.0 93.7 182.1 36.8 24.1 19.1 17.4 91.9 Level of Service D F F D C B B F Approach Delay (s) 92.5 116.6 19.5 89.6 Approach LOS F F B F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 83.1 _ HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 60: Military Rd S & S 272 St II 8/6/2015 --,V -+-- k' 4\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations tt ti ' t r Vi 1� Volume (vph) 157 1027 413 273 679 66 292 355 93 75 659 125 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% 0% 0% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1789 3578 1475 1770 3439 3406 1855 1493 1782 1831 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1789 3578 1475 1770 3439 3406 1855 1493 1782 1831 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 157 1027 413 273 679 66 292 355 93 75 659 125 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 165 0 5 0 0 0 57 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 157 1027 248 273 740 0 292 355 36 75 779 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 0 0 4 1 4 1 2 2 0 4 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 37.0 37.0 20.0 42.0 11.0 53.7 53.7 9.3 52.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 37.0 36.0 20.0 42.0 11.0 53.7 53.7 9.3 52.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.30 0.08 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 191 945 379 252 1031 267 711 572 118 680 vls Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.29 c0.15 0.22 c0.09 0.19 0.04 c0.43 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.82 1.09 0.65 1.08 0.72 1.09 0.50 0.06 0.64 1.15 Uniform Delay, dl 61.2 51.5 46.4 60.0 43.7 64.5 32.9 27.3 63.7 44.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 22.9 55.8 8.5 80.7 4.3 82.4 0.2 0.0 8.0 82.1 Delay (s) 84.1 107.3 55.0 140.7 48.0 146.9 33.1 27.3 71.7 126.1 Level of Service F F D F D F C C E F Approach Delay (s) 91.5 72.9 77.3 121.4 Approach LOS F E E F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 90.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.11 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.9% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils272 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: S Peasley C n Rd 8/6/2015 t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r t t r Volume (vph) 421 672 509 570 1424 616 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 421 672 509 570 1424 616 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 179 0 0 0 56 Lane Group Flow (vph) 421 493 509 570 1424 560 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 17.0 103.0 81.0 81.0 Effective Green, g (s) 27.0 27.0 17.0 103.0 81.0 81.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.74 0.58 0.58 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 662 305 416 1370 1077 915 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.15 0.31 c0.76 v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.64 1.62 1.22 0.42 1.32 0.61 Uniform Delay, d1 52.0 56.5 61.5 7.0 29.5 19.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.59 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 291.8 120.4 0.9 150.2 2.4 Delay (s) 53.5 348.3 181.9 8.0 172.4 13.9 Level of Service D F F A F B Approach Delay (s) 234.7 90.0 124.5 Approach LOS F F F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 144.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 124.9% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/6/2015 -11 - * t, 41 L Movement ESi- EET EDR WBL Yv° T W'" NBU ,N91- INCT NBR &BU S i- Lane Configurations 4 r 9 Ttl M Volume (vph) 38 45 20 598 50 322 34 14 887 570 6 525 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1759 1694 1715 1568 1805 4748 3318 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1759 1694 1715 1568 1805 4748 3318 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 38 45 20 598 50 322 34 14 887 570 6 525 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 249 0 0 66 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 103 0 323 325 73 0 48 1391 0 0 531 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 13 13 22 22 22 18 18 Confl. Bikes (#Ihr) 2 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.8 31.7 31.7 31.7 6.6 52.0 11.5 Effective Green, g (s) 21.8 31.7 31.7 31.7 7.1 52.5 12.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.05 0.38 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 273 383 388 355 91 1780 284 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.19 0.19 0.03 0.29 c0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.84 0.84 0.21 0.53 0.88dr 1.87 Uniform Delay, d1 53.0 51.8 51.7 43.9 64.8 38.7 64.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.03 1.03 2.82 1.01 0.90 0.90 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 14.8 13.9 0.1 2.5 3.4 404.1 Delay (s) 53.3 68.2 67.2 123.8 68.1 38.4 461.8 Level of Service D E E F E D F Approach Delay (s) 53.3 86.3 39.3 Approach LOS D F D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 121.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 102.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/0112014 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/6/2015 1 4/ Movement SHT SBR La4'11�onfigufations ttT+ Volume (vph) 2154 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4956 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. flow (perm) 4956 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 2154 133 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 2283 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 18 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 56.9 Effective Green, g (s) 57.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2031 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.12 Uniform Delay, dl 41.3 Progression Factor 1.24 Incremental Delay, d2 62.8 Delay (s) 114.1 Level of Service F Approach Delay (s) 179.6 Approach LOS F Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 8/612015 dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 8/612015 11 --► 'r A— 4\ 41 Movement EBL EBT EBR bVBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tl" 0 t r Vi t if Volume (vph) 265 515 247 426 587 122 147 344 214 333 489 285 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -5% 8% 3% -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1824 3283 1716 3212 1760 1784 1444 1794 1846 1508 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1824 3283 1716 3212 190 1784 1444 342 1846 1508 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 265 515 247 426 587 122 147 344 214 333 489 285 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 42 0 0 14 0 0 0 133 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 265 720 0 426 695 0 147 344 81 333 489 285 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 16 16 6 6 20 20 35 35 Confl. Bikes (#Ihr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 5 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.3 33.2 35.3 36.2 48.8 30.3 30.3 48.8 39.1 71.4 Effective Green, g (s) 32.3 33.2 35.3 36.2 48.8 30.3 30.3 48.8 39.1 71.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.22 0.22 0.35 0.28 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 427 790 439 843 177 392 317 316 523 781 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.22 c0.25 0.22 0.06 0.19 c0.14 0.26 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 0.06 c0.23 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.91 0.97 0.82 0.83 0.88 0.25 1.05 0.93 0.36 Uniform Delay, dl 47.3 50.9 50.7 47.8 35.6 52.0 44.4 37.6 48.1 19.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 14.5 35.0 6.3 25.8 18.8 0.2 65.5 23.8 0.1 Delay (s) 49.3 65.3 85.8 54.1 61.4 70.8 44.6 103.0 71.9 19.8 Level of Service D E F D E E D F E B Approach Delay (s) 61.2 66.0 60.9 67.9 Approach LOS E E E E Inter«cbnn Sumrna HCM 2000 Control Delay 64.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 137.8 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant -10101/2014 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1056: Military Rd S & S 288 St 8/6/2015 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2557: 28 Av S & S 312 St II 8/6/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NB T NBR SBL SHT SBR Lane Configurations *To + 4 r Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 373 2 105 2 0 0 153 297 2 0 265 528 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 373 2 105 2 0 0 153 297 2 0 265 528 ❑ir-ct•ipn, Lane # E8 1 VVB 1 NB 1 581 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) 480 2 452 265 528 Volume Left (vph) 373 2 153 0 0 Volume Right (vph) 105 0 2 0 528 Hadj (s) 0.04 0.20 0.10 0.02 -0.68 Departure Headway (s) 7.0 9.5 7.2 7.5 6.7 Degree Utilization, x 0.93 0.01 0.90 0.55 0.99 Capacity (veh/h) 518 365 505 480 528 Control Delay (s) 50.9 12.6 45.9 17.9 60.4 Approach Delay (s) 50.9 12.6 45.9 46.2 Approach LOS F B E E Intersection Summary Delay 47.4 Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/30/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3028: 21 Av SW & SW 320 St 8/612015 'r ,- 4-,, t .4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NSL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 +T t r I ♦T Volume (vph) 142 405 99 564 1156 85 104 473 424 74 566 364 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 3% 3% -2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1743 3345 3374 3459 1791 1900 1573 1741 3269 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1743 3345 3374 3459 180 1900 1573 399 3269 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 405 99 564 1156 85 104 473 424 74 566 364 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 4 0 0 0 100 0 73 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 488 0 564 1237 0 104 473 324 74 857 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8 2 2 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 6 6 2 0 2 0 4 4 6 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA D.P+P NA pm+ov D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 5 3 8 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 15.0 38.8 26.2 50.0 56.0 49.1 75.3 56.0 45.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.0 38.8 26.2 50.0 56.0 49.1 75.3 56.0 45.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.28 0.19 0.36 0.40 0.35 0.54 0.40 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 186 927 631 1235 198 666 902 225 1050 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.15 c0.17 c0.36 0.04 c0.25 0.07 0.02 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.14 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.53 0.89 1.00 0.53 0.71 0.36 0.33 0.82 Uniform Delay, dl 60.8 42.8 55.5 45.0 53.6 39.3 18.5 29.2 43.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 1.27 Incremental Delay, d2 15.3 0.3 14.7 26.0 1.2 6.3 0.1 0.2 5.3 Delay (s) 76.1 43.1 70.3 71.0 54.8 45.6 18.7 38.7 60.8 Level of Service E D E E D D B D E Approach Delay (s) 50.3 70.8 35.2 59.2 Approach LOS D E D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 57.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: All Traffic Data - May 2, 2012 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 St/S 320 St II 8/6/2015 --* --,N. ■-- t t 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVI3R NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r tt r tt r tt r Volume (vph) 0 958 264 0 1599 268 0 666 350 0 590 201 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3457 1538 3535 1583 3592 1560 3556 1511 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (Perm) 3457 1538 3535 1583 3592 1560 3556 1511 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 958 264 0 1599 268 0 666 350 0 590 201 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 24 0 0 16 0 0 114 0 0 27 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 958 240 0 1599 252 0 666 236 0 590 174 Confl. Peds. (#(hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 96.4 96.4 95.9 95.9 34.1 34.1 34.6 34.6 Effective Green, g (s) 96.4 95.4 95.9 95.9 34.1 34.1 34.6 34.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.68 0.69 0.69 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2380 1048 2421 1084 874 379 878 373 v/s Ratio Prot 0.28 c0.45 c0.19 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.23 0.66 0.23 0.76 0.62 0.67 0.47 Uniform Delay, d1 9.4 8.4 12.7 8.3 49.2 47.2 47.6 44.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.26 1.23 0.94 0.89 1.09 1.17 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.5 1.2 0.4 3.5 2.2 1.5 0.3 Delay (s) 9.9 8.9 17.2 10.6 50.0 44.2 53.2 52.8 Level of Service A A B B D D D D Approach Delay (s) 9.7 16.3 48.0 53.1 Approach LOS A B D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/15/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SIB Ramp & S 320 St 8/6/2015 'A --►-1,'r 4--- V Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r ) ttt Vi 4 W Volume (vph) 0 1689 507 134 1609 0 0 0 0 694 3 1302 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1507 1759 5122 1667 1686 3600 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 5046 1507 1759 5122 1667 1686 3600 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1689 507 134 1609 0 0 0 0 694 3 1302 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1689 276 134 1609 0 0 0 0 347 350 1271 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 4 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Split NA custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 61.4 61.4 17.0 69.8 46.6 46.6 60.2 Effective Green, g (s) 61.4 61.4 17.0 69.8 46.6 46.6 60.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.44 0.12 0.50 0.33 0.33 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2213 660 213 2553 554 561 1548 vls Ratio Prot c0.33 0.08 c0.31 0.21 0.21 c0.35 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.42 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.62 0.82 Uniform Delay, d1 33.2 27.0 58.5 25.7 39.4 39.3 35.1 Progression Factor 1.32 3.39 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 1.9 4.1 1.2 1.6 1.6 3.5 Delay (s) 46.2 93.5 62.6 26.9 41.0 40.9 38.6 Level of Service D F E C D D D Approach Delay (s) 57.2 29.6 0.0 39.4 Approach LOS E C A D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 43.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps/1-5 NB Ramp & S 320 St 8/6/2015 ---► --v 4-- 4\ t Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL WST VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations W r W� 4 r Volume (vph) 0 1746 607 0 1290 207 398 0 336 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% -1% 2% 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1575 5018 1651 1664 1533 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1575 5018 1651 1664 1533 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1746 607 0 1290 207 398 0 336 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1746 607 0 1486 0 199 199 324 0 0 0 Confi. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 1 1 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 94.5 140.0 94.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 Effective Green, g (s) 94.5 140.0 94.5 35.5 35.5 34.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 1.00 0.68 0.25 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3406 1575 3387 _ 418 421 377 v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 0.30 0.12 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.39 c0.21 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.39 0.44 0.48 0.47 0.86 Uniform Delay, dl 11.3 0.0 10.5 44.4 44.3 50.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.02 1.02 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 16.8 Delay (s) 11.9 0.7 12.4 45.4 45.3 67.8 Level of Service B A B D D E Approach Delay (s) 9.0 12.4 55.6 0.0 Approach LOS A B E A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 St/S Peasley C n Rd 8l6/2015 -11 --0- 'f- 4--- 4\ t I #41 Movement EBL E2T EBB WBL WBT W8R NBL NBT NEE SSL 5BT SBR Lane Configurations tt r 0 t if Vi t r Volume (vph) 220 1140 682 232 1034 133 175 254 55 147 391 268 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 1508 1770 3432 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3525 1508 1770 3432 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 220 1140 682 232 1034 133 175 254 55 147 391 268 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 38 0 7 0 0 0 46 0 0 141 Lane Group Flow (vph) 220 1140 644 232 1160 0 175 254 9 147 391 127 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 50.0 73.0 18.0 50.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 50.0 71.0 18.0 50.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.36 0.51 0.13 0.36 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.21 0.21 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 1258 829 227 1225 288 306 247 363 385 311 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.32 c0.12 0.13 c0.34 0.10 0.14 0.08 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.30 0.01 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.91 0.78 1.02 0.95 0.61 0.83 0.04 0.40 1.02 0.41 Uniform Delay, dl 60.7 42.8 28.0 61.0 43.7 54.3 56.6 49.2 48.0 55.5 48.1 Progression Factor 1.19 1.13 1.29 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 47.2 10.0 3.8 65.5 15.8 2.5 16.4 0.0 0.3 49.9 0.3 Delay (s) 119.2 58.3 40.0 126.5 59.5 56.8 73.0 49.2 48.3 105.4 48.4 Level of Service F E D F E E E D D F D Approach Delay (s) 58.8 70.6 64.4 76.0 Approach LOS E E E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils320 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4028: 21 Av SW & SW 336 St/SW Campus Dr 8/6/2015 "V ,- *-- 4\ t I Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT MR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations 0 +t +1r, ► +1k Volume (vph) 384 645 105 182 1184 201 203 539 105 16 287 554 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 11 Grade (%) 0% 1% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3351 3359 3295 3438 1545 1694 3284 1730 3239 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.14 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3351 3359 3295 3438 1545 195 3284 247 3239 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 384 645 105 182 1184 201 203 539 105 16 287 554 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 0 81 0 12 0 0 0 53 Lane Group Flow (vph) 384 741 0 182 1184 120 203 632 0 0 303 804 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 5 5 1 1 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 6 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.6 58.2 11.2 52.3 52.3 51.1 29.5 51.6 36.6 Effective Green, g (s) 17.6 58.2 11.2 52.3 52.3 51.1 29.5 51.6 36.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.42 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.37 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 421 1396 263 1284 577 226 691 325 846 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.22 0.06 c0.34 0.09 0.19 0.15 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.23 c0.20 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.53 0.69 0.92 0.21 0.90 0.91 0.93 0.95 Uniform Delay, d9 60.4 30.7 62.7 41.9 29.8 37.0 54.0 52.8 50.8 Progression Factor 0.97 0.95 1.10 0.99 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.30 1.33 Incremental Delay, d2 23.3 1.4 6.1 12.0 0.8 32.8 16.4 31.7 19.2 Delay (s) 82.1 30.5 74.9 53.7 31.9 69.9 70.4 100.6 87.0 Level of Service F C E D C E E F F Approach Delay (s) 48.0 53.3 70.3 90.5 Approach LOS D D E F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 64.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants -10/22/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4028: 21 Av SW & SW 336 St/SW Campus Dr 8/6/2015 4/ Movement SSR LaWonfigurations Volume (vph) 303 Ideal Flow (vphpi) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 303 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 _ Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS I ntersect#;_, 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/6/2015 t it 4\ L* 10. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations Vi t j" j tt. M +ft Volume (vph) 296 375 388 142 567 108 14 294 1268 111 26 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1735 1872 1537 1749 3447 3401 4946 1796 Flt Permitted 0.15 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 274 1872 1537 360 3447 3401 4946 1796 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 296 375 388 142 567 108 14 294 1268 111 26 84 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 128 0 12 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 296 375 260 142 663 0 0 308 1372 0 0 110 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 6 0 4 4 2 6 4 2 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.9 34.8 34.8 46.9 33.4 12.0 57.1 15.5 Effective Green, g (s) 46.9 34.8 34.8 46.9 33.4 12.0 57.1 15.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.25 0.25 0.33 0.24 0.09 0.41 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle_ Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 232 465 382 240 822 291 2017 198 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.20 0.05 0.19 c0.09 0.28 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.30 0.17 0.15 vlc Ratio 1.28 0.81 0.68 0.59 0.81 1.06 0.68 0.56 Uniform Delay, dl 39.3 49.4 47.6 53.2 50.3 64.0 34.0 59.0 Progression Factor 1.44 1.07 1.33 1.12 1.09 1.23 0.91 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 152.2 9.0 3.6 2.5 5.3 68.1 1.8 1.9 Delay (s) 208.8 61.8 66.7 62.1 60.1 147.0 32.6 61.1 Level of Service F E E E E F C E Approach Delay (s) 104.7 60.4 53.5 Approach LOS F E D Intersection Su HCM 2000 Control Delay 57.4 HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/18/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group HCM 2000 Level of Service E Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 ICU Level of Service G 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/6/2015 Movement SET SER LaneXonfigurations ttt r Volume (vph) 1856 317 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5134 1571 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5134 1571 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1856 317 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 48 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1856 269 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blocks es #/hr 4 2 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 60.6 74.1 Effective Green, g (s) 60.6 74.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.53 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2222 831 vls Ratio Prot c0.36 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.32 Uniform Delay, dl 35.3 18.7 Progression Factor 1.00 0.99 Incremental Delay, d2 3.9 0.1 Delay (s) 39.1 18.6 Level of Service D B Approach Delay (s) 37.3 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 19 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4218: 39 Av SW/Hoyt Rd SW & SW 340 St 8/612015 --p. f- *-- 4\ t II t Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBP. NBL NRT NBR SEL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT), 0 T+ t Volume (vph) 50 529 125 387 834 194 237 240 175 148 227 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3389 1750 3430 1756 1744 1778 1834 1572 Fit Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 342 3389 499 3430 649 1744 232 1834 1572 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 50 529 125 387 834 194 237 240 175 148 227 127 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 13 0 0 12 0 0 20 0 0 0 102 Lane Group Flow (vph) 50 641 0 387 1016 0 237 395 0 148 227 25 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 4 4 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 5 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 5 3 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 78.1 50.7 78.1 72.8 43.9 35.3 43.4 27.3 27.3 Effective Green, g (s) 78.1 50.7 78.1 72.8 43.9 35.3 43.4 27.3 27.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.36 0.56 0.52 0.31 0.25 0.31 0.20 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 244 1227 523 1783 334 439 161 357 306 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.19 c0.14 0.30 0.08 0.23 0.05 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.27 c0.14 c0.23 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.52 0.74 0.57 0.71 0.90 0.92 0.64 0.08 Uniform Delay, dl 16.4 35.1 19.6 22.9 38.8 50.6 60.1 51.8 46.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.47 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.21 1.22 2.34 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 1.6 4.7 1.3 5.6 20.3 46.4 2.7 0.0 Delay (s) 16.6 36.7 33.4 18.7 44.3 70.9 119.1 65.6 108.0 Level of Service B D C B D E F E F Approach Delay (s) 35.3 22.7 61.2 92.1 Approach LOS D C E F Intersection Surnma HCM 2000 Control Delay 43.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/23/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 20 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4840: 1 Av S & SW Campus Dr/S 348 St 8/6/2015 -,* _10. N 1 4/ Movement E8L EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N-0, i NER SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations ti� tt r tT4 I ++ r Volume (vph) 112 738 178 295 1512 158 64 155 194 172 760 300 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% -1% 7% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3384 3387 3443 3578 1578 1711 3120 1799 3613 1593 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3384 3387 3443 3578 1578 1711 3120 1799 3613 1593 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 112 738 178 295 1512 158 64 155 194 172 760 300 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 14 0 0 0 45 0 170 0 0 0 62 Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 902 0 295 1512 113 64 179 0 172 760 238 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 3 3 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 5 2 1 6 7 Permitted Phases 8 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 62.1 18.0 69.6 93.5 7.5 17.0 23.9 32.9 43.4 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 62.1 18.0 69.6 93.5 7.5 17.0 23.9 32.9 43.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.44 0.13 0.50 0.67 0.05 0.12 0.17 0.23 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 253 1502 442 1778 1110 91 378 307 849 493 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.27 c0.09 c0.42 0.02 c0.04 0.06 0.10 c0.21 0.04 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.60 0.67 0.85 0.10 0.70 0.47 0.56 0.90 0.48 Uniform Delay, d1 62.0 29.5 58.1 30.7 8.3 65.2 57.3 53.2 51.9 39.2 Progression Factor 0.86 1.04 1.25 1.64 3.62 0.78 1.16 1.09 1.10 1.18 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.8 2.6 4.7 0.0 7.3 0.1 1.4 11.5 0.3 Delay (s) 53.6 32.4 75.5 55.1 30.1 58.2 66.5 59.2 68.5 46.4 Level of Service D C E E C E E E E D Approach Delay (s) 34.7 56.2 65.2 61.8 Approach LOS C E E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/22/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/6/2015 t -'t Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR Lane Configurations A ttl� Volume (vph) 45 133 1427 298 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% f 4--- 4\ t lb� 4 WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT 789 1435 60 274 537 582 146 1024 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1 % 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 4888 3369 4967 3288 4344 1296 3485 4950 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0:95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1737 4888 3369 4967 3288 4344 1296 3485 4950 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 45 133 1427 298 789 1435 60 274 537 582 146 1024 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 23 0 0 3 0 0 70 30 0 39 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 178 1702 0 789 1492 0 274 758 261 146 1300 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 3 3 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.5 44.2 21.0 48.2 12.9 45.4 66.4 8.9 41.4 Effective Green, g (s) 17.5 44.2 21.0 48.2 12.9 45.4 66.4 8.9 41.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.32 0.15 0.34 0.09 0.32 0.47 0.06 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 1543 505 1710 302 1408 614 221 1463 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.35 c0.23 0.30 c0.08 0.17 0.06 0.04 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.82 1.10 1.56 0.87 0.91 0.54 0.42 0.66 0.89 Uniform Delay, dl 59.7 47.9 59.5 43.0 63.0 38.7 24.2 64.1 47.1 Progression Factor 1.01 0.93 0.62 0.87 1.16 1.34 1.99 0.94 1.09 Incremental Delay, d2 19.5 56.2 256.4 2.3 24.4 0.2 0.1 5.6 6.7 Delay (s) 80.1 100.6 293.3 39.8 97.4 52.1 48.3 65.5 58.0 Level of Service F F F D F D D E E Approach Delay (s) 98.7 127.4 60.2 58.8 Approach LOS F F E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 92.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description; 9/11/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/6/2015 W Movement SBR L$Wonfigurations Volume (vph) 315 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (oerm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 315 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Su 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 } 8/6/2015 :t 10. 'r 4--- 4-- it 4.\ I i� \► Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations W r ))) ttt r M tT r Volume (vph) 4 109 1573 391 957 1685 413 157 399 732 487 434 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 4% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1556 3419 3300 1441 3502 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1556 3419 3300 1441 3502 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 109 1573 391 957 1685 413 157 399 732 487 434 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 94 0 0 186 0 0 9 55 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 113 1573 297 957 1685 227 0 556 840 315 434 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 4 5 5 1 1 1 14 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA pt+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 23 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 42.9 42.9 18.0 50.4 50.4 17.0 39.7 57.7 19.9 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 42.9 42.9 18.0 50.4 50.4 17.0 39.7 57.7 19.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.13 0.36 0.36 0.12 0.28 0.41 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s)_ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 126 1498 455 646 1844 560 415 935 593 497 vls Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.32 c0.19 0.33 c0.16 c0.25 0.22 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.90 1.05 0.65 1.48 0.91 0.41 1.34 0.90 0.53 0.87 Uniform Delay, dl 64.2 48.5 42.1 61.0 42.7 33.6 61.5 48.2 31.0 58.8 Progression Factor 0.64 0.51 0.29 1.02 0.98 1.07 0.86 1.03 1.54 1.10 Incremental Delay, d2 25.6 30.1 2.9 220.1 3.8 0.9 167.9 10.7 0.4 15.0 Delay (s) 66.9 54.9 15.3 282.2 45.6 36.7 220.7 60.1 48.2 79.9 Level of Service E D B F D D F E D E Approach Delay (s) 48.1 118.5 108.0 Approach LOS D F F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 88.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/09/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 24 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 8/6/2015 Movement SBT SBR LaAnonfigurations W, Volume (vph) 791 132 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.98 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5044 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5044 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 791 132 RTOR Reduction (vph) 17 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 906 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr 2 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 42.1 Effective Green, g (s) 42.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1516 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.60 Uniform Delay, dl 41.7 Progression Factor 1.16 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 Delay (s) 48.9 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 58.8 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 25 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5228: 21 Av SW & SW 356 St II 8/6/2015 --I, --t ,- 4\ t t W Movement ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T Vi tt 1� 4 r Volume (vph) 530 416 3 236 1206 231 60 47 13 303 119 399 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -1% 0% 1% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3460 1864 1796 3473 1766 1805 1807 1526 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3460 1864 1796 3473 1766 1805 1807 1526 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 530 416 3 236 1206 231 60 47 13 303 119 399 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 7 0 0 0 268 Lane Group Flow (vph) 530 419 0 236 1427 0 60 53 0 0 422 131 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 3 3 4 4 3 3 8 8 Confl. Bikes (#Ihr) 3 1 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr) 1 2 0 0 3 1 3 1 2 2 0 3 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA SPIit NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 1 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 59.9 20.4 61.8 12.7 12.7 29.5 29.5 Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 59.9 20.4 61.8 12.7 12.7 29.5 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.43 0.15 0.44 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 457 797 261 1533 160 163 380 321 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.22 0.13 c0.41 c0.03 0.03 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 1.16 0.53 0.90 0.93 0.38 0.32 1.11 0.41 Uniform Delay, dl 60.8 29.6 58.8 37.1 59.9 59.6 55.2 47.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.09 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.15 2.37 Incremental Delay, d2 93.8 2.5 30.4 11.3 0.5 0.4 79.2 0.3 Delay (s) 154.5 32.0 94.5 46.8 60.5 60.0 142.7 113.4 Level of Service F C F D E E F F Approach Delay (s) 100.5 53.6 60.3 128.5 Approach LOS F D E F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 83.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/29/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 26 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5240: 1 Av S & SW 356 St/S 356 St 8/6/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WST fWSR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T r 0 ►j t r ►j t r Volume (vph) 305 490 33 75 1108 102 33 56 54 346 72 778 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 5% 3% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1808 1919 1578 1742 3421 1696 1785 1530 1761 1853 1563 Fit Permitted 0.07 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 142 1919 1578 567 3421 1268 1785 1530 1335 1853 1563 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 305 490 33 75 1108 102 33 56 54 346 72 778 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 18 0 4 0 0 0 45 0 0 208 Lane Group Flow (vph) 305 490 15 75 1206 0 33 56 9 346 72 570 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 71.0 63.7 63.7 71.0 53.5 49.5 23.5 23.5 49.5 46.5 46.5 Effective Green, g (s) 71.0 63.7 63.7 71.0 53.5 49.5 23.5 23.5 49.5 46.5 46.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.46 0.46 0.51 0.38 0.35 0.17 0.17 0.35 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 280 873 717 348 1307 457 299 256 551 615 519 vls Ratio Prot c0.14 0.26 0.01 0.35 0.00 0.03 0.12 0.04 vls Ratio Perm c0.41 0.01 0.10 0.02 0.01 c0.11 c0.36 v/c Ratio 1.09 0.56 0.02 0.22 0.92 0.07 0.19 0.04 0.63 0.12 1.10 Uniform Delay, dl 45.1 27.9 21.0 19.8 41.3 30.0 50.0 48.8 36.4 32.5 46.8 Progression Factor 1.26 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.53 1.31 1.78 Incremental Delay, d2 79.5 2.6 0.1 0.1 8.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 61.1 Delay (s) 136.6 26.4 21.0 18.6 56.4 30.1 50.2 48.8 56.8 42.7 144.1 Level of Service F C C B E C D D E D F Approach Delay (s) 66.8 54.2 45.0 112.7 Approach LOS E D D F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 77.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.10 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultants-10/16/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 27 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 8/6/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations + tT M ttT I Volume (vph) 244 567 316 271 538 48 2 175 976 63 4 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % -3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3470 1891 1594 1764 3510 3240 4743 1754 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.17 Satd. Flow (perm) 3470 1891 1594 177 3510 3240 4743 314 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 244 567 316 271 538 48 2 175 976 63 4 97 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 112 0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 244 567 204 271 580 0 0 177 1034 0 0 101 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% 7% 2% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA custom D.P+P Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 1 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 27.2 42.0 42.0 57.0 28.8 9.5 52.7 61.0 Effective Green, g (s) 27.2 42.0 42.0 57.0 28.8 10.5 53.7 61:0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.41 0.21 0.08 0.38 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 674 567 478 242 722 243 1819 222 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.30 c0.12 0.17 c0.05 0.22 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 c0.34 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.36 1.00 0.43 1.12 0.80 0.73 0.57 0.45 Uniform Delay, dl 48.9 49.0 39.3 59.1 52.9 63.4 34.0 25.2 Progression Factor 0.94 1.07 1.13 0.70 1.31 1.00 1.00 0.82 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 36.1 0.2 93.5 6.1 8.9 1.3 0.5 Delay (s) 46.1 88.4 44.6 135.0 75.5 72.2 35.3 21.0 Level of Service D F D F E E D C Approach Delay (s) 67.0 94.3 40.7 Approach LOS E F D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 66.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/1012014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 28 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St _ 8/612015 1 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lanel�onfigurations W) Volume (vph) 1370 535 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane LIM. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.96 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (Prot) 4812 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4812 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1370 535 RTOR Reduction (vph) 50 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1855 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% Bus Blockages #/hr 2 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 51.5 Effective Green, g (s) 51.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1770 v/s Ratio Prot c0.39 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 1.05 Uniform Delay, dl 44.2 Progression Factor 0.89 Incremental Delay, d2 33.6 Delay (s) 73.2 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) 70.5 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 29 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5251: Enchanted Pkwy S & S 356 St 8/6/2015 --,, 'r 4-� t II t 4/ Movement EBL EBT EBR WB€. WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r Vi 1� tT Vi tt Volume (vph) 217 10 522 39 81 11 586 1253 64 14 1322 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1765 1540 1750 1844 3484 3544 1778 3540 Fit Permitted 0.59 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1100 1540 743 1844 3484 3544 1778 3540 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 217 10 522 39 81 11 586 1253 64 14 1322 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 399 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 227 123 39 88 0 586 1315 0 14 1327 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 8 8 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.0 32.0 32.5 32.5 22.0 81.0 2.7 61.7 Effective Green, g (s) 33.0 33.0 34.5 34.5 24.0 82.0 2.7 63.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 0.17 0.59 0.02 0.46 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 259 363 183 454 597 2075 34 1610 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.17 0.37 0.01 c0.37 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.08 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.34 0.21 0.19 0.98 0.63 0.41 0.82 Uniform Delay, dl 51.5 44.4 42.0 41.8 57.8 19.1 67.9 33.3 Progression Factor 0.62 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.33 1.06 1.17 Incremental Delay, d2 25.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 30.5 1.4 2.5 4.2 Delay (s) 57.4 41.8 42.2 41.8 100.1 26.7 74.3 43.1 Level of Service E D D D F C E D Approach Delay (s) 46.5 41.9 49.3 43.5 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 46.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action PM Synchro 8 Report SK Page 30 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St } 8/6/2015 v. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 0 01 1)) + tlr+ Zi Volume (vph) 320 433 179 167 347 211 30 221 880 77 2 118 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 3249 1755 3179 3439 4993 1773 Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 324 3249 471 3179 3439 4993 1773 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 320 433 179 167 347 211 30 221 880 77 2 118 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 36 0 0 72 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 320 576 0 167 486 0 0 251 951 0 0 120 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 14 29 29 42 42 42 29 29 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 6 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 50.9 41.1 51.4 27.2 14.0 55.8 13.3 Effective Green, g (s) 48.9 40.1 49.4 26.2 14.0 55.8 13.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.29 0.35 0.19 0.10 0.40 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 341 930 251 594 343 1990 168 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.18 0.04 0.15 c0.07 0.19 0.07 vls Ratio Perm c0.17 0.19 vlc Ratio 0.94 0.62 0.67 0.82 0.73 0.48 0.71 Uniform Delay, dl 37.8 43.3 49.9 54.6 61.2 31.3 61.5 Progression Factor 1.06 1.07 1.26 1.23 0.53 0.23 1.21 Incremental Delay, d2 32.3 0.9 5.0 8.2 6.0 0.7 10.7 Delay (s) 72.4 47.4 67.9 75.5 38.5 8.0 85.1 Level of Service E D E E D A F Approach Delay (s) 56.0 73.7 14.3 Approach LOS E E B Intersection ^ o'nar HCM 2000 Control Delay 48.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 220 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/25/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 8/6/2015 i Movement SBT SBR LaneZ�onfigurations +tt r Volume (vph) 1226 288 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5108 1476 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5108 1476 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1226 288 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 144 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1226 144 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type NA Perm Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 55.1 55.1 Effective Green, g (s) 55.1 54.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2010 570 v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.25 Uniform Delay, dl 33.9 29.2 Progression Factor 1.34 3.11 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 1.0 Delay (s) 46.6 91.9 Level of Service D F Approach Delay (s) 57.4 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 8/6/2015 ---► ■-- it r Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NSR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 1� T W. Volume (vph) 98 66 122 160 71 125 48 208 1107 161 9 150 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1566 1699 1567 1769 4892 1737 Flt Permitted 0.33 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 599 1566 806 1567 1769 4892 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 98 66 122 160 71 125 48 208 1107 161 9 150 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 51 0 0 53 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 137 0 160 143 0 0 256 1256 0 0 159 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 14 14 19 19 19 25 25 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 31.5 26.1 31.5 18.4 23.6 68.5 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 29.5 25.1 29.5 17.4 23.6 68.5 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.18 0.21 0.12 0.17 0.49 0.15 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 225 280 197 194 298 2393 260 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.09 c0.03 0.09 c0.14 0.26 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.14 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.49 0.81 0.74 0.86 0.52 0.61 Uniform Delay, dl 54.5 51.7 57.2 59.1 56.6 24.6 55.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.66 0.76 0.83 1.48 0.85 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.5 20.6 11.8 10.9 0.4 2.5 Delay (s) 55.0 52.2 58.4 56.8 57.7 36.7 50.0 Level of Service D D E E E D D Approach Delay (s) 53.1 57.5 40.2 Approach LOS D E D Intersection Surnma HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 8/6/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lanelponfig u rations +0 Volume (vph) 1505 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5064 At Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5064 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1505 53 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1556 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 4 0 Turn Type NA _ Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 65.9 Effective Green, g (s) 65.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2383 v/s Ratio Prot c0.31 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.65 Uniform Delay, d1 28.3 Progression Factor 0.72 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 Delay (s) 21.6 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 24.2 Approach LOS C Intersection 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 •J r► ■-- it #1' Movement EBU EBL EBT ESR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations M +0 M ttt r M ttT4 Volume (vph) 59 414 1259 155 1 443 917 287 13 226 936 366 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3571 5146 3467 5081 1555 3377 4819 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3571 5146 3467 5081 1555 3377 4819 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 59 414 1259 155 1 443 917 287 13 226 936 366 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 102 0 0 51 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 473 1403 0 0 444 917 185 0 239 1252 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 35 35 15 15 15 24 24 24 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#!hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 43.5 19.0 42.5 42.5 13.7 39.0 Effective Green, g (s) 19.5 43.5 19.0 42.5 42.5 13.7 39.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.31 0.14 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 497 1598 470 1542 472 330 1342 v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.27 c0.13 0.18 0.07 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.88 0.94 0.59 0.39 0.72 0.93 Uniform Delay, d1 59.8 45.7 60.0 41.4 38.5 61.3 49.2 Progression Factor 0.88 0.84 1.23 1.46 2.08 0.65 0.98 Incremental Delay, d2 27.5 6.9 21.7 1.2 1.7 4.1 8.9 Delay (s) 80.0 45.5 95.5 61.9 81.9 43.8 57.2 Level of Service F D F E F D E Approach Delay (s) 54.1 74.4 55.1 Approach LOS D E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 59.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 l* \M' Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M ttt r Volume (vph) 31 405 1066 247 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1493 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3440 5136 1493 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 31 405 1066 247 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 97 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 436 1066 150 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 19 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 43.3 43.3 Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 43.3 43.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 442 1588 461 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.99 0.67 0.33 Uniform Delay, dl 60.9 42.1 37.1 Progression Factor 0.94 0.89 1.24 Incremental Delay, d2 33.6 1.7 1.4 Delay (s) 90.6 39.4 47.5 Level of Service F D D Approach Delay (s) 53.3 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 t 4 Movement EBL EST EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M ttT-), ti� ++T 1� �} 1� Volume (vph) 327 1755 107 13 123 1413 208 162 86 91 253 127 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1%a -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.91 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3402 4962 3318 4767 1708 1671 1719 1650 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.38 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3402 4962 3318 4767 290 1671 687 1650 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 327 1755 107 13 123 1413 208 162 86 91 253 127 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 12 0 0 30 0 0 42 Lane Group Flow (vph) 327 1858 0 0 136 1609 0 162 147 0 253 278 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 7 7 18 18 18 4 4 12 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.5 74.5 10.5 68.5 36.5 20.2 36.5 27.1 Effective Green, g (s) 16.5 74.5 10.5 68.5 35.5 19.7 35.5 26.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.53 0.08 0.49 0.25 0.14 0.25 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 400 2640 248 2332 163 235 290 313 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 c0.37 0.04 c0.34 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 c0.12 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.70 0.55 0.69 0.99 0.63 0.87 0.89 Uniform Delay, d1 60.3 24.5 62.5 27.6 60.5 56.7 47.1 55.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.24 0.68 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.04 0.93 Incremental Delay, d2 6.3 0.8 1.0 1.3 68.3 3.7 23.1 24.1 Delay (s) 66.8 31.1 43.6 10.6 128.7 60.4 72.2 75.4 Level of Service E C D B F E E E Approach Delay (s) 36.4 13.2 93.0 74.0 Approach LOS D B F E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 36.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 4/ Movement SBR LanEWonfigurations Volume (vph) 193 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Width 12 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, pedlbikes Flpb, ped/bikes Fri: Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 193 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% Bus Blockages #Ihr 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 4Q► Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR N8L NBT NBR SBL S8T Lane Configurations M TT " )) ttT + r T Volume (vph) 6 313 1487 69 614 1502 400 40 144 245 512 227 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4874 3483 5040 1733 1735 1513 3359 1661 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3240 4874 3483 5040 1733 1735 1513 3359 1661 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 313 1487 69 614 1502 400 40 144 245 512 227 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 3 0 0 30 0 0 0 62 0 17 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 319 1553 0 614 1872 0 40 144 183 512 347 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 25 25 10 10 17 17 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 10 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.5 54.2 21.5 63.2 8.4 22.2 43.7 22.1 35.9 Effective Green, g (s) 12.5 54.2 21.5 63.2 7.9 21.7 43.7 21.6 35.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.39 0.15 0.45 0.06 0.15 0.31 0.15 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 289 1886 534 2275 97 268 531 518 419 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 0.32 c0.18 c0.37 0.02 0.08 0.05 c0.15 c0.21 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 v/c Ratio 1.10 0.82 1.15 0.82 0.41 0.54 0.34 0.99 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 63.8 38.6 59.2 33.5 63.8 54.5 37.1 59.1 49.4 Progression Factor 0.96 0.93 0.78 0.75 1.20 0.98 1.02 1.05 1.13 Incremental Delay, d2 82.3 4.0 85.7 3.2 1.0 1.0 0.1 35.2 11.6 Delay (s) 143.3 39.9 131.7 28.2 77.3 54.7 38.2 97.1 67.7 Level of Service F D F C E D D F E Approach Delay (s) 57.5 53.5 47.4 84.8 Approach LOS E D D F Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 59.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: TC2 - 9/24/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 8/6/2015 W Movement SBR Lan4Configurations Volume (vph) 137 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) At Permitted Satd. Flow (oerm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 137 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% Bus Blockaaes (#/hr) 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/6/2015 -A ■--- fi t L Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t r 1� A Ttt Volume (vph) 173 171 190 470 303 49 83 176 1369 206 5 182 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1097 3375 1792 1773 5005 1730 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 1778 1812 1097 3375 1792 1773 5005 1730 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 173 171 190 470 303 49 83 176 1369 206 5 182 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 106 0 5 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 173 171 84 470 347 0 0 259 1562 0 0 187 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16 16 16 16 9 9 9 8 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 72 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.1 26.0 26.0 20.9 30.8 21.6 57.1 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 15.6 25.5 25.5 20.4 30.3 21.6 57.1 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.22 0.15 0.41 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 198 330 199 491 387 273 2041 197 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 0.09 c0.14 c0.19 c0.15 c0.31 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.52 0.42 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.77 0.95 Uniform Delay, dl 61.2 51.7 50.7 59.4 53.3 58.7 35.7 61.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.14 Incremental Delay, d2 31.1 0.6 0.5 29.5 22.1 39.9 2.8 36.9 Delay (s) 92.4 52.3 51.3 78.5 76.8 98.5 38.5 107.1 Level of Service F D D E E F D F Approach Delay (s) 64.9 77.7 47.0 Approach LOS E E D Intersection Svmma HCM 2000 Control Delay 50.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/24/2014 -Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 8/6/2015 t 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lan4onfigurations W4 Volume (vph) 1188 268 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.97 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (Prot) 4915 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4915 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1188 268 RTOR Reduction (vph) 24 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1432 0 Confl. Peds. (#mr) 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 51.5 Effective Green, g (s) 51.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1808 v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.79 Uniform Delay, d1 39.5 Progression Factor 0.59 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 Delay (s) 25.7 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 35.0 Approach LOS C intersecti,+n Summary — 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 670: S Peasley Cyn Rd 8/6/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi) r '� + t r Volume (vph) 341 518 478 570 929 444 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3433 1583 3433 1863 1863 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 341 518 478 570 929 444 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 272 0 0 0 58 Lane Group Flow (vph) 341 246 478 570 929 386 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 23.4 23.4 21.2 106.6 80.4 80.4 Effective Green, g (s) 23.4 23.4 21.2 106.6 80.4 80.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.76 0.57 0.57 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 573 264 519 1418 1069 909 v/s Ratio Prot 0.10 c0.14 0.31 c0.50 v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.93 0.92 0.40 0.87 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 53.9 57.5 58.6 5.7 25.3 16.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.58 0.30 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 37.3 21.5 0.9 4.0 0.6 Delay (s) 55.0 94.8 80.1 6.6 18.6 5.5 Level of Service E F F A B A Approach Delay (s) 79.0 40.1 14.4 Approach LOS E D B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 39.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 St/S 320 St II 8/6/2015 --,P. 4--- *-- -N t /P. t -V Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NiBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r tt r tt r tt r Volume (vph) 0 1291 178 0 1136 257 0 458 345 0 306 111 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3457 1538 3535 1583 3592 1560 3556 1511 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3457 1538 3535 1583 3592 1560 3556 1511 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1291 178 0 1136 257 0 458 345 0 306 111 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 55 0 0 64 0 0 40 0 0 57 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1291 123 0 1136 193 0 458 305 0 306 54 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 2 2 1 1 4 4 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 6 2 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 96.2 96.2 95.7 95.7 34.3 34.3 34.8 34.8 Effective Green, g (s) 96.2 95.2 95.7 95.7 34.3 34.3 34.8 34.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.24 0.24 0.25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2375 1045 2416 1082 880 382 883 375 v/s Ratio Prot c0.37 0.32 0.13 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.12 c0.20 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.12 0.47 0.18 0.52 0.80 0.35 0.14 Uniform Delay, dl 10.9 7.8 10.3 8.0 45.7 49.6 43.3 41.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.36 2.41 0.87 0.87 1.27 1.96 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.2 10.1 0.1 0.1 Delay (s) 11.8 8.0 14.6 19.5 40.3 53.2 54.8 80.2 Level of Service B A B B D D D F Approach Delay (s) 11.4 15.5 45.8 61.6 Approach LOS B B D E Int?rsecfinn S urnmary HCM 2000 Control Delay 24.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Traffic Count Consultant-10/15/2014 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St 8/11/2015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r ) ttt *T W Volume (vph) 0 1709 776 235 1589 0 0 0 0 188 0 1075 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1507 1759 5122 1667 1681 3600 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1507 1759 5122 1667 1681 3600 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1709 776 235 1589 0 0 0 0 188 0 1075 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1709 425 235 1589 0 0 0 0 94 94 1035 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 5 5 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 4 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Split NA custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 64.0 64.0 27.0 82.4 34.0 34.0 47.6 Effective Green, g (s) 64.0 64.0 27.0 82.4 34.0 34.0 47.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.19 0.59 0.24 0.24 0.34 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2306 688 339 3014 404 408 1224 v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 c0.13 0.31 0.06 0.06 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.62 0.69 0.53 0.23 0.23 0.85 Uniform Delay, dl 31.2 28.8 52.6 17.2 42.5 42.5 42.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 4.1 4.9 0.7 0.1 0.1 5.3 Delay (s) 33.4 32.9 57.5 17.8 42.6 42.6 48.1 Level of Service C C E B D D D Approach Delay (s) 33.2 23.0 0.0 47.3 Approach LOS C C A D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 33.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps/1-5 NB Ramp & S 320 St8/6/2015 * --1. -)v f 4---A\ I Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WSR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +++ r W. 4 r Volume (vph) 0 1154 680 0 1307 132 480 2 100 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 2% 3% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1575 5062 1651 1669 1533 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1575 5062 1651 1669 1533 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1154 680 0 1307 132 480 2 100 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1154 680 0 1434 0 240 242 41 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 2 2 1 1 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Split NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 104.4 140.0 104.4 25.6 25.6 25.6 Effective Green, g (s) 104.4 140.0 104.4 25.6 25.6 24.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 1.00 0.75 0.18 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3762 1575 3774 301 305 269 v/s Ratio Prot 0.23 0.28 c0.15 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm c0.43 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.43 0.38 0.80 0.79 0.15 Uniform Delay, dl 5.9 0.0 6.3 54.7 54.7 48.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.29 1.02 1.02 1.06 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.9 0.3 12.8 12.4 0.1 Delay (s) 6.1 0.9 8.4 68.7 68.2 51.9 Level of Service A A A E E D Approach Delay (s) 4.1 8.4 65.6 0.0 Approach LOS A A E A intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 15.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/23/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3064: Military Rd S & S 320 St/S Peasley Cyn Rd 8/6/2015 � � 4r- 4\ t Movement EHL EBT EBR WBL W6T WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r 0 t r I t r Volume (vph) 142 794 201 67 885 112 225 139 57 148 190 380 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 1499 1770 3434 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3525 1499 1770 3434 1755 1863 1506 1755 1863 1506 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 794 201 67 885 112 225 139 57 148 190 380 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 71 0 6 0 0 0 48 0 0 257 Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 794 130 67 991 0 225 139 9 148 190 123 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.8 70.1 91.7 8.8 64.1 21.6 21.6 21.6 19.5 19.5 19.5 Effective Green, g (s) 14.8 70.1 89.7 8.8 64.1 21.6 21.6 21.6 19.5 19.5 19.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.50 0.64 0.06 0.46 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 187 1765 1024 111 1572 270 287 232 244 259 209 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.23 0.02 0.04 c0.29 c0.13 0.07 0.08 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.01 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.45 0.13 0.60 0.63 0.83 0.48 0.04 0.61 0.73 0.59 Uniform Delay, d1 60.9 22.5 9.8 63.9 28.9 57.5 54.1 50.4 56.6 57.8 56.5 Progression Factor 1.11 1.30 4.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 12.4 0.7 0.0 6.2 1.9 18.5 0.5 0.0 2.9 8.9 2.7 Delay (s) 79.6 29.9 47.5 70.1 30.9 76.0 54.6 50.4 59.6 66.7 59.2 Level of Service E C D E C E D D E E E Approach Delay (s) 39.2 33.3 65.5 61.2 Approach LOS D C E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 45.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: Mils320 c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/6/2015 --* -,* '- *-- it 4 I * L* \► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations Vi t r T'l� M ttt Volume (vph) 176 101 158 84 173 57 2 170 1556 122 5 49 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1732 1872 1537 1743 3395 3401 4953 1796 Fit Permitted 0.53 1.00 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 969 1872 1537 1183 3395 3401 4953 1796 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 176 101 158 84 173 57 2 170 1556 122 5 49 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 133 0 28 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 101 25 84 202 0 0 172 1673 0 0 54 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 7 7 3 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 4 4 2 6 4 2 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.7 22.2 22.2 33.7 23.2 10.2 78.2 7.6 Effective Green, g (s) 33.7 22.2 22.2 33.7 23.2 10.2 78.2 7.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.16 0.16 0.24 0.17 0.07 0.56 0.05 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 290 296 243 330 562 247 2766 97 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.05 c0.34 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.02 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.34 0.10 0.25 0.36 0.70 0.60 0.56 Uniform Delay, dl 45.3 52.4 50.4 44.4 51.8 63.4 20.6 64.6 Progression Factor 1.27 1.05 3.05 1.19 1.14 1.12 0.69 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 6.6 1.0 3.9 Delay (s) 60.0 55.1 153.8 53.2 59.1 77.6 15.2 69.0 Level of Service E E F D E E B E Approach Delay (s) 92.9 57.5 21.0 Approach LOS F E C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/18/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 8/6/2015 Movement SLT S,SR Lanelponffgurations ttt it Volume (vph) 1648 178 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5134 1569 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5134 1569 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1648 178 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1648 116 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 2 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 75.6 86.1 Effective Green, g (s) 75.6 86.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.61 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2772 964 v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.12 Uniform Delay, dl 21.8 11.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.0 Delay (s) 22.8 11.2 Level of Service C B Approach Delay (s) 23.0 Approach LOS C Interseclion Summary 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/6/2015 2b -. --v r 4-4\ T r' 140. 1 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Wo )) +0 M ttltl r M W-i Volume (vph) 18 167 1630 142 644 1005 73 224 545 539 152 628 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 1% 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.95 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 4966 3369 4947 3288 4359 1297 3485 4844 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1737 4966 3369 4947 3288 4359 1297 3485 4844 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 18 167 1630 142 644 1005 73 224 545 539 152 628 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 0 68 33 0 77 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 185 1765 0 644 1073 0 224 747 236 152 906 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 3 3 2 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 5% 5% 5% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.5 50.9 21.0 47.9 13.2 38.6 59.6 9.0 34.4 Effective Green, g (s) 24.5 50.9 21.0 47.9 13.2 38.6 59.6 9.0 34.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.36 0.15 0.34 0.09 0.28 0.43 0.06 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 303 1805 505 1692 310 1201 552 224 1190 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 c0.36 c0.19 0.22 0.07 c0.17 0.06 0.04 c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.98 1.28 0.63 0.72 0.62 0.43 0.68 0.76 Uniform Delay, dl 53.3 44.0 59.5 38.7 61.6 44.3 28.2 64.1 49.0 Progression Factor 1.00 0.90 0.76 0.93 1.28 1.44 2.00 0.76 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 2.4 16.0 131.2 0.9 5.6 0.6 0.2 6.1 2.6 Delay (s) 55.7 55.8 176.2 36.7 84.8 64.4 56.7 54.7 52.0 Level of Service E E F D F E E D D Approach Delay (s) 55.8 88.9 66.3 52.3 Approach LOS E F E D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 66.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/11/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4848: Pacific Hwy S & S 348 St 8/6/2015 4/ Movement '' ER L$Wonfigurations Volume (vph) 355 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 355 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkwy S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 8/6/2I015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ttt r W ttt r M tT)� r Vi� W4 Volume (vph) 178 1819 349 794 1166 386 95 420 943 653 319 699 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -4% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 0.85 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1556 3419 3292 1441 3502 5073 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1688 4891 1485 5027 5123 1556 3419 3292 1441 3502 5073 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 178 1819 349 794 1166 386 95 420 943 653 319 699 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 93 0 0 167 0 0 10 51 0 11 Lane Group Flow (vph) 178 1819 256 794 1166 219 0 515 1103 432 319 775 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 5 5 1 1 1 14 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 3% 3% 3% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 23 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 44.0 44.0 16.0 41.5 41.5 16.0 47.5 63.5 13.0 44.0 Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 44.0 44.0 16.0 41.5 41.5 16.0 47.5 63.5 13.0 44.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.34 0.45 0.09 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 223 1537 466 574 1518 461 390 1116 653 325 1594 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.37 c0.16 0.23 c0.15 c0.34 0.30 c0.09 0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.80 1.18 0.55 1.38 0.77 0.47 1.32 0.99 0.66 0.98 0.49 Uniform Delay, dl 58.9 48.0 39.8 62.0 44.9 40.3 62.0 46.0 29.9 63.4 38.9 Progression Factor 0.61 0.54 0.22 0.99 0.99 1.07 0.88 1.10 1.50 1.06 1.11 Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 86.3 2.4 177.0 1.6 1.4 160.9 23.5 1.9 44.1 0.1 Delay (s) 45.3 112.4 11.2 238.6 45.9 44.5 215.7 74.2 46.8 111.2 43.1 Level of Service D F B F D D F E D F D Approach Delay (s) 92.2 110.9 102.5 62.8 Approach LOS F F F E Intersection Scmma HCM 2000 Control Delay 96.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.14 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/09/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 8/6/2015 41 Movement SBR 4wenfigurations Volume (vph) 87 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, pedlbikes Frt At Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 Turn Type _ Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 816/2I015 '# --I. --v fl t # Movement EBL EST EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations t r 0 V +tT ) W-) Volume (vph) 324 598 171 215 415 77 1 108 853 66 71 838 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % -3% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3470 1891 1594 1764 3467 3240 4735 1753 4765 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.20 1.00 Satd. Flow(Perm) 3470 1891 1594 154 3467 3240 4735 373 4765 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 324 598 171 215 415 77 1 108 853 66 71 838 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 105 0 13 0 0 0 6 0 0 65 Lane Group Flow (vph) 324 598 66 215 479 0 0 109 913 0 71 1212 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 3% 3% 3% 7% 7% 7% 7% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 Turn Type Prot NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 48.3 48.3 61.7 24.7 10.6 49.7 56.3 45.7 Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 48.3 48.3 61.7 24.7 11.6 50.7 56.3 45.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.34 0.34 0.44 0.18 0.08 0.36 0.40 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 7.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 892 652 549 221 611 268 1714 215 1555 v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 0.32 c0.09 0.14 0.03 c0.19 0.02 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 c0.33 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.92 0.12 0.97 0.78 0.41 0.53 0.33 0.78 Uniform Delay, dl 42.6 43.9 31.3 58.0 55.1 60.9 35.3 27.1 42.6 Progression Factor 1.02 1.06 1.40 0.56 1.54 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.94 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 16.2 0.0 51.8 5.9 0.4 1.2 0.3 3.3 Delay (s) 43.4 63.0 43.8 84.5 90.8 61.3 36.5 24.1 43.3 Level of Service D E D F F E D C D Approach Delay (s) 54.2 88.9 39.1 42.3 Approach LOS D F D D Intersection Surnroiry HCM 2000 Control Delay 52.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1 % ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5246: Pacific Hwy S & S 356 St 8/6/2015 Movement SBR LtWonf gurations Volume (vph) 439 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, ped/bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (Perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 439 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% Bus Blockages (01r) 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Su 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5251: Enchanted Pkw S & S 356 St 8/612015 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 1� tTl� I ♦? Volume (vph) 295 13 355 17 14 13 540 1239 36 17 926 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% -1% 1 % Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1764 1540 1751 1731 3484 3558 1778 3542 Fit Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1322 1540 524 1731 3484 3558 1778 3542 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 295 13 355 17 14 13 540 1239 36 17 926 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 267 0 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 308 88 17 17 0 540 1274 0 17 926 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 4 4 8 8 6 6 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (Mr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 33.7 33.7 34.2 34.2 26.1 79.1 2.9 55.9 Effective Green, g (s) 34.7 34.7 36.2 36.2 28.1 80.1 2.9 57.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.20 0.57 0.02 0.41 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 327 381 135 447 699 2035 36 1464 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.15 0.36 0.01 c0.26 v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.23 0.13 0.04 0.77 0.63 0.47 0.63 Uniform Delay, dl 51.7 42.0 39.8 38.9 52.9 20.0 67.8 32.6 Progression Factor 0.58 0.29 1.00 1.00 1.22 1.33 1.06 1.37 Incremental Delay, d2 33.7 0.1 0.2 0.0 4.4 1.3 2.9 1.7 Delay (s) 63.4 12.2 39.9 38.9 69.0 27.9 74.7 46.3 Level of Service E B D D E C E D Approach Delay (s) 36.0 39.3 40.1 46.8 Approach LOS D D D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 41.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: 9/10/2014 - Traffic Count Consultant c Critical Lane Group 2025 Action Saturday Synchro 8 Report SK Page 14 2016 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final SEIS 7y90 T xo,�<s Jim Ferrell, Mayor December 30, 2015 Re: 2016 City Center Planned Action Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) The City of Federal Way has prepared the 2016 City, Center Planned Action Final Supplemental Environmentallmpact Statement (SEIS). Pursuant to State SEPA laws and rules, the City issued a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) on October 16, 2015. A 30-day comment period followed issuance of the DSEIS. A public meeting on the DSEIS was held on November 9, 2015. The Final SEIS includes all comments received during the comment period, responses to comments, and corrections and revisions to the DSEIS. The planned action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312th Street, on the south by South 3241h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23rdAvenue South. Additional area is located east of 23,d Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 3171h Street and on the south by South 319th Place. The proposed action specifically consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The documents are posted on the City's website at t.:l��vwn.ci.Federal-u+ay.wa.uslindex.asjsx?N]17=z[13. CD copies may be purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way. Your interest in the City of Federal Way is greatly appreciated. If you would like more information about this proposal, please contact Senior Planner Stacey Welsh at 253-835-2634, or 4tare}•.�vclsh cit��nffcdet�.hva�•.cnm. Sincerely, Michael A. Morales Community Development Director c: Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 • www.cityoffederalway.com R,,7 1 � I i 11 1 , { Fact Sheet Project Title City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Proposed Action and Alternatives Proposed Action The action proposed by the City of Federal Way consists of the following by the City of Federal Way City Council: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. Action Alternative Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. No Action Alternative Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. City Center Planned Action EIS The City of Federal Way completed an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the City Center Planned Action in 2006. This 2016 Planned Action Supplemental EIS incorporates by reference and supplements the analysis contained in the 2006 City Center Planned Action EIS and the four Addenda to the 2006 EIS. Location The Planned Action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312d' Street, on the south by South 32e Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23rd Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23`d Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317`h Street and on the south by South 319d` Place. City Center Planned Action Fact Sheet 1 Final Planned Action SEIS Proponent City of Federal Way Date of Implementation 2016-2025 — With market driven phased development following necessary permit approvals. Lead Agency City of Federal Way 33325 8 h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Responsible Official Michael A. Morales, Director, Community Development Department Contact Person Stacey Welsh, AICP, Senior Planner City of Federal Way Community Development Department 33325 8t' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253.835.2634 stacey. welshCa)c iUoffederalway.com Required Approvals Planned Action Ordinance Adoption SEIS Authors and Principal Contributors The Final SEIS has been prepared under the direction of the City of Federal Way. Principal Authors: City of Federal Way Community Development & Public Works Departments 33325 8'h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253.835.7000 City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS Contributing Authors: Fehr & Peers 1011 4`h Avenue, Suite 4120 Seattle, WA 98154 206.576.4220 (Transportation) Fact Sheet 2 Public Comment A public comment period was held between October 16, 2015, and November 16, 2015, during which time written comment on the Draft EIS was invited. A public meeting regarding the DSEIS was held on November 9, 2015, for interested parties to provide verbal comment. Date of Draft SEIS Issuance October 16, 2015 Date of Final SEIS Issuance December 30, 2015 Final SEIS Purchase Price CD copies may be purchased for $10.00 at the Federal Way City Hall Permit Center, 33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way. Previous Environmental Documents o City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued June 2006 o City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued September 2006 .■ Addendum #1, issued February 2008 ■ Addendum #2, issued April 2010 ■ Addendum #3, issued November 2010 ■ Addendum #4, issued November 2014 Location of Background Information City of Federal Way Community Development Department See the Lead Agency and Responsible Official address listed above (available Monday -Friday 8:OOam-5:OOpm). City Center Planned Action Fact Sheet 3 Final Planned Action SEIS ADOPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT Adoption for (check appropriate box): ❑ DNS I EIS ❑ other Description of current proposal: 2016 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action SEIS Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. This action also includes procedural text amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14 (Environmental Policy) Section 14.15.130 (City Center Planned Action) related to the Planned Action designation and process. Proponent: City of Federal Way Location of current proposal: The Planned Action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312'h Street, on the south by South 324'h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23rd Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23`d Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317'h Street and on the south by South 319'h Place. Title of document being adopted: City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued June 2006; City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), issued September 2006; Addendum #1, issued February 2008; Addendum #2, issued April 2010; Addendum #3, issued November 2010; and Addendum #4, issued November 2014. Agency that prepared document being adopted: City of Federal Way Date adopted document was prepared: 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2014 (see above) Description of document (or portion) being adopted: 2006 Planned Action EIS and Addenda. If the document being adopted has been challenged (WAC 197-11-630), please describe: N/A The document is available to be read at (place/time): City of Federal Way Community Development Department, 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way; Monday -Friday 8:00am-5:00pm We have identified and adopted this document as being appropriate for this proposal after independent review. The document meets our environmental review needs for the current proposal and will accompany the proposal to the decision maker. Name of agency adopting document: City of Federal Way Contact person: Stacey Welsh, AICP, Senior Planner Phone: 253.835.2634 Responsible official: Michael A. Morales Position/title: Community Development Director Phone: 253.835.2612 Address: 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Date: October 16, 2015 Signature: see Draft SEIS 2016 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final SEIS Prepared by: City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, Washington 98003 December 2015 Table of Contents Chapter1 Summary.................................................................................... 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................ 1.2 Proposed Action and Location ......................................... Proposed Action............................................................ Location........................................................................ 1.3 Description of Alternatives .............................................. Alternative1.................................................................. Alternative2.................................................................. 1.4 Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures. 1.5 Issues to Be Resolved .................................................... 1.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ....................... .......................... .......... 1-2 ................................... 1-2 ................................... 1-2 ................................... 1-2 Chapter 2 Description of the Proposal and Alternative.............2-1 2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................... 2-1 Overview of the Proposed Action........................................................................ 2-1 Background......................................................................................................... 2-3 Objectives of the Proposal ................................................... ...... ....... 2-4 2.2 Planned Action Process ............................... ....... ..................... ........... .......... ........ 2-4 Planned Action Overview......................................................................... ........... 2-4 PlannedAction EIS............................................................................................. 2-4 Planned Action Ordinance.................................................................................. 2-4 2.3 Environmental Review.......................................................................................... 2-5 City Center Planned Action EIS.......................................................................... 2-5 2.4 Proposed Action and Alternative........................................................................... 2-5 Overview........................................................... .................................. ........... --- 2-5 Alternative1........................................................................................................ 2-5 Alternative2....................................................................................................... 2-6 2.5 Benefits and Disadvantages of Delaying the Proposed Action .............................. 2-6 2.6 Major Issues to be Resolved.......................................................................•-------- 2-6 Chapter 3 Affected Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures.......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Air Quality............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Land Use...............................................................................................................3-1 Affected Environment ........ ................................................ ............... ................ ....3-1 Impacts............................................................................................................... 3-4 Mitigation Measures............................................................................................3-5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts...........................................................3-6 3.3 Aesthetics, Light and Glare...................................................................................3-6 3.4 Transportation........................................................................................................ 3-6 Affected Environment..........................................................................................3-7 Impacts............................................................................................................. 3-17 Mitigation..........................................................................................................3-21 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts.........................................................3-25 City Center Planned Action Table of Contents 1 Final Planned Action SEIS 3.5 Public Services....................................................................................................3-26 Affected Environment............................................................ .......................... ..3-26 Impacts............................................................................................................. 3-28 MitigationMeasures............................................................... .......... ................ .3-29 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts......................................................... 3-29 3.6 Utilities................................................................................................................ 3-30 Affected Environment........................................................................................3-30 Im pacts............................................................................................................. 3-34 MitigationMeasures..........................................................................................3-34 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts......................................................... 3-35 Chapter 4 Comments and Responses....................................................4-1 4.1 Public Comments......................................................... ........................................ 4-1 4.2 Responses to Comments......................................................................................4-6 Chapter 5 References ................................................. ............................5-1 5.1 Printed References................................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Personal Communications ............................... •.................................................... 5-1 List of Tables & Figures Table 1-1 Summary of Potential Impacts of Proposed Action and No Action Alternative ....... 1-3 Table 2-1 Planned Action Development Envelope...............................................................2-1 Table 2-2 Alternative 1 (Action) New development through 2025........................................2-5 Table 2-3 Alternative 2 (No Action) New development through 2025............. ...................... 2-6 Table 3-1 Existing Development Planned Action Project Area..............................................3-1 Table 3-2 Vacant and Redevelopable Land Summary .........................................................3-3 Table 3-3 Population and Employment Densities.................................................................3-4 Table 3-4 Project Area Existing Employment (# of FTEs)................. :.................................... 3-4 Table 3-5 Alternatives 1 & 2 Population and Employment Projections ......... ......................... 3-5 Table 3-6 Land Use Mix by Alternative................................................................................3-6 Table 3-7 Study Intersections Included in Analyses ........................................... .................. 3-7 Table 3-8 Existing Land Use................................................................................................3-9 Table 3-9 Right -of -Way for Major Area Streets ............................................ ........................ 3-9 Table 3-10 Existing Conditions Intersection Analysis Results................................................3-10 Table 3-11 Existing Parking Requirements..........................................................................3-11 City Center Planned Action Table of Contents 2 Final Planned Action SEIS Table 3-12 Five -Year Collision Rates (2010-2014)...... ........................................................ 3-12 Table 3-13 City Center Land Use Future No Action & Action Alternatives............................3-14 Table 3-14 Transportation Improvement Projects through 2025..........................................3-14 Table 3-15 Changes to Study Intersection from TIP..............................................................3-15 Table 3-16 Trip Generation by Alternative...........................................................................3-16 Table 3-17 2025 No Action Alternative Operations Analysis...............................................3-18 Table 3-18 2025 Action Alternative Operations Analysis ..................................... ................. 3-19 Table 3-19 Future Parking Requirements........................................................ .......... .......... 3-20 Table 3-20 Crime Statistics in City Center Project Area ................................................... .... 3-27 Table 3-21 Traffic Enforcement Activity 1/1/15-6/30/15........................................................3-27 Table 3-22 Water and Sewer Service Demand Estimates....................................................3-30 Figure 1 Planned Action Area............................................................... ........ ........................ ..2-2 Figure 2 Vacant and Redevelopable Land...............................................................................3-2 List of Appendices Appendix 1. Distribution List Appendix 2. Transportation Impact Analysis City Center Planned Action Table of Contents 3 Final Planned Action SEIS Chapter 1 Summary 1.1 Introduction Throughout this document, in reference to the SEIS, the word "draft" has either been removed or replaced with the word "final," as appropriate. Section 3.4, "Transportation," has been replaced in its entirety to reflect several updates made to Appendix 2, "Transportation Impact Analysis." Chapter 4 (previously "References") is a new chapter, "Comments and Responses," while "References" is now Chapter 5 and otherwise remains unchanged. This chapter summarizes information contained in this Planned Action Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS). It contains a summary of the alternatives, significant impacts, mitigation measures, and significant unavoidable adverse impacts. This summary is intentionally brief, the reader should consult individual sections of this SEIS for detailed information concerning the affected environment, impacts, and mitigation measures. 1.2 Proposed Action and Location Proposed Action The Proposed Action consists of two related elements: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. This action also includes procedural text amendments to the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 14 (Environmental Policy), 14.15.130 (City Center Planned Action) related to the Planned Action designation and process. These changes are not expected to have an environmental impact. Location The Planned Action project area is located in the City Center subarea of the City of Federal Way, bounded on the north by South 312`' Street, on the south by South 324`h Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23`d Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23`d Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317`h Street and on the south by South 319'h Place. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 1.3 Description of Alternatives Alternative 1 (Action) Alternative 1, the 2025 Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in a portion of the City Center subarea in accordance with the amounts listed in the Planned Action Area development envelope. Alternative 2 (No Action) Alternative 2, the 2025 No Action Alternative, includes an increase in land use in the City Center subarea assuming the level of growth established in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. 1.4 Summary of Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures Table 1-1 provides a summary of the environmental impacts for each element of the environment evaluated in Chapter 3. For a complete discussion of the elements of the environment considered in this SEIS, please refer to Chapter 3. 1.5 Issues to Be Resolved Adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance supports development and re -development of the area to a more intensive mixed -use downtown consistent with the vision of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. The key environmental issue facing decision makers is the impact of additional traffic on area roadways and mitigating measures to address such impacts. 1.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Transportation Development of the Planned Action area would generate additional traffic volumes on the area's roadways. Increases in traffic congestion at some intersections and/or along some corridors will result in significant, unavoidable, adverse impacts on the area's transportation system. However, the increased capacity associated with improvement projects would adequately mitigate undesired impacts. The proposed mixed -use land use pattern, on -site improvements, and TDM actions, along with high levels of transit service, may further reduce vehicle trips; thereby, further mitigating impacts on the transportation system. City Center Planned Action 1-2 Final Planned Action SEIS Table 1-1. Summary of Potential Impacts of Proposed Action and No Action Alternative Proposed Action Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Action No Action 3.2 Land Use Land Use Patterns New development through 2025 Retails ace: 475,000 sf 672,000 sf Offices ace: 400,000 sf 262,000 sf Hotel rooms: 600 0 Residential units: 2,400 1,671 Impacts Common to All Alternatives Land use patterns will intensify and the mix of uses will increase. Over time, the scale of buildings may also increase as new development occurs and building heights are maximized along with density consistent with the zoning code. Land Use Compatibility Land use compatibility impacts could result under any of the alternatives. As vacant land is developed and other properties are Impacts Common to All Alternatives redeveloped, uses that are currently separated and buffered from each other will be required to co -exist in closer proximity. The potential for conflict between uses with differing activity levels will increase as development results in a diversity and mix of uses in the project area. Neighborhoods around the edges of the project area with lower intensity uses, such as single and multi -family residential areas, could experience impacts. Population, Employment Housing A greater amount of housing and lodging would result from Alternative 1. The new Compared to the action alternative, Alternative 2 would result in less residential and employment population. Over employment population would have an emphasis on office and retail employment. half of the new employment created under Alternative 2 New office/services jobs would remain the largest employment group. would be in the retail sector. Impacts Common to All Alternatives Under all alternatives future residential and employment populations will increase, though at different amounts. Mitigation Measures Existing development standards along the edges of the Planned Action area appear to be adequate to allow for a compatible transition from more intensive to less intensive uses. However, as development occurs, this transition area should be evaluated to confirm that long-term land use compatibility impacts are not being created. If necessary, new development standards for edge areas should be considered. Techniques could include site and building lighting limits and requirements for landscaping, noise control, and other measures. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 1-3 Proposed Action Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Action No Action 3.4 Transportation Traffic Operations Impact For the No Action Alternative, none of the intersections are anticipated to be deficient based on the Cib/s traffic operations standards with programmed improvements. The Action Alternative does not degrade the LOS of any of the study intersections to be worse than the No Action Alternative. Overall, the level of intersection delay is less during the PM peak hour at all but three intersections for the Action Alternative. Parking Requirements At full buildout, the cumulative parking requirement (existing plus At full buildout, the cumulative parking requirement (existing plus new) new) for the Planned Action area would be approximately 14,593 for the Planned Action area would be approximately 12,952 stalls. stalls. The Action Alternative requires 1,641 more stalls than the No Action Alternative. Trip Generation During the AM peak hour, nearly 1,892 trips would be added. Total During the AM peak hour, nearly 1,315 trips would be added. Total AM AM peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 1 would be peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 2 would be approximately 3,617 trips. During the PM peak hour, an additional- approximately 3,040 trips. During the PM peak hour, an additional nearly 2,147 trips would be added. Total PM peak hour traffic growth nearly 2,274 trips would be added. Total PM peak hour traffic growth resulting from Alternative 1 would be approximately 6,792 trips. resulting from Alternative 2 would be approximately 6,919 trips. Impacts Common to All Alternatives Traffic Safety Probability of traffic collisions would increase with additional traffic. The City and WSDOT have made investments in the study area in an on -going effort to reduce the number of preventable accidents that occur. Transit Service Ridership demand at the Federal Way Transit Center may increase with increased development in the project area. Pedestrian & Bicycle Mobility The alternatives along with the proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities highlighted in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan will increase safety and encourage walking and bicycling as a mode of transportation in and around the City Center. Mitigation Measures (This section summarizes the proposed mitigation anticipated to be required beyond the roadway improvements assumed to be constructed by 2025. These projects are listed on the City Transportation Improvement Plan and Capital Improvement Program.) Roadway Network For all intersections, the level of service (LOS) grade does not degrade between the No Action and Action Alternatives. Because the level of service grade does not change, the transportation impacts of the Action Alternatives are less than significant and no mitigation is proposed under the Transportation Impact Analysis. Development within the Planned Action area will be required to pay the required transportation impact fee. Parking Additional parking spaces will be required on site for both the No Action and Action Alternatives. These spaces may be provided on site or as part of parking garages assumed as part of the Planned Action area development. Parking requirements will be determined as each development is submitted. The number of parking spaces required could be reduced through shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management. Additional mitigation Additional improvements could be required to meet the expected travel demand on area roadways associated with the proposed development in the project area. Development will need to meet the requirements of applicable codes at the time of application. Requirements might include the dedication of right-of-way, installing curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and drainage improvements. Additional mitigation may be required for individual development applications within the project area to reduce area traffic impacts or improve on -site circulation and to meet City and State requirements for Commute Trip Reduction and Transportation Demand Management. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 1-4 Proposed Action Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Action No Action 3.5 Public Services Police Expected residential and employment growth will result in an Expected residential and employment growth will result in an Level of Service (LOS) increased need of approximately 13 officers by 2025 to maintain the increased need of approximately 9.7 officers by 2025 to maintain current LOS. the current LOS. Parks and Recreation Additional residents will result in an increased demand for 70.6 Additional residents will result in an increased demand for 49.2 LOS acres of new parkland in the City to maintain the current LOS. acres of new parkland in the City to maintain the current LOS. Impacts Common to All Alternatives Construction activity in the Planned Action area may affect the response times of emergency vehicles. Fire Over the long term, future development will result in an incremental increase in calls for emergency service and future traffic growth may impact response time. South King Fire & Rescue reports it is positioned to provide service for the growth. Mitigation Measures Coordinate with Police and South King Fire & Rescue during final design, construction, and operation of future development to ensure reliable emergency access is maintained. Reduce public safety impacts thru adherence to crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) design standards. Provide emergency service providers with advanced notice of construction schedules and any planned street closures or blockages. Avoid or minimize street closures or blockages during construction to avoid potential impact to emergency response times. Coordinate with the Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Services Department to identify opportunities for increased recreational open space for general public use throughout the project area, and within new development proposals. 3.6 Utilities Impacts Common to all Alternatives Water and Sanitary There is adequate water flow available and with the downtown sewer trunk upgrade, there is adequate wastewater collection and treatment capacity at the Sewer Service Lakota Plant for these alternatives. Energy Construction activities could result in disruption of service, with the need to relocate service lines, and other construction related impacts. Over the long term, development under either alternative will increase demand for energy. Puget Sound Energy (PSE) indicates it has planned for growth and reports adeauate capacity to serve the increased demand. Telecommunication Increased residential and employment population will increase use of and demand for services. Providers indicate they have adequate capacity. Mitigation Measures Ensure that all new development complies with local, state, and federal standards for energy conservation. Encourage drought -tolerant landscaping (xeriscaping) for new development. Encourage new development to incorporate appropriate water conservation measures into their operations. Plan with service providers to minimize impacts of utility relocations (equipment procurement times, relocate in advance of construction, etc.). Inform utility customers of any planned temporary service disruptions. Coordinate with all utility companies on the design of the new services and connections. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 1-5 Chapter 2 Description of the Proposal and Alternative 2.1 Introduction Overview of the Proposed Action The 2006 EIS covered analysis of the Planned Action development envelope through the year 2014. In the intervening years, the Great Recession (2007-2009) resulted in significant job loss statewide and across the country. Significant reductions in residential and commercial development have persisted for years. Recovery has been slow and has affected previous development projections considerably. Taking into account development trends in a recovering economy, revisions have been made to the development envelope contained in the 2006 EIS. In addition, an extended timeline is more realistic for the development envelope to be built. Therefore, the SEIS analyzes a revised development envelope through the end of year 2025. In the 2006 EIS the Planned Action area was divided into three "blocks" for analysis. This SEIS does not utilize that same analysis format, rather the entire Planned Action area is reviewed as a whole unit. The action proposed by the City of Federal Way consists of the following: Adoption of an ordinance renewing the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action for the purposes of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.440 and WAC 197-11-164. The Planned Action designation would apply to proposed residential, commercial, office, hotel, and other development within the development envelope analyzed in this SEIS. The total development envelope analyzed in this SEIS is summarized in Table 2-1. The project area is shown in Figure 1. Table 2-1. Planned Action Development Envelope Uses Development Envelope Retail 475,000 sf Office 400,000 sf Lodging 600 rooms Residential 2,400 units Source: City of Federal Way, 2015 The Planned Action designation would apply to development that occurs through the end of year 2025. This action also includes procedural text amendments to the FWRC Title 14 (Environmental Policy), 14.15.130 (City Center Planned Action) related to the Planned Action designation and process. These changes are not expected to have an environmental impact and are not discussed further in this SEIS. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 2-1 &ty of Federal Figure 1: Planned Action Area Supplement,ii E ... A i v J 3 t St iI jowl > WElow. CD CN J, -e-s- J, N 4 ;.. '.$ •; : ,320t I _k --ma Federa vV—ay- gig" 7 2 4t -n-A oft Al- j-7 '77 .M Legend Planned Action SEPA Area 7T AXV1 i flell City- Center Element CITY OF Federal Way This map is mte--nde-d for use as a graphiczal rep,-ese-niatorl. j EEC '.CCC The Cizy of FeJera1'v%'3y makes I f1mmomM FE,-- no warranty as to its ac:cur3cy_ Although the Planned Action designation would not apply to development proposals outside of the Planned Action area, the environmental analysis conducted in this SEIS could be used to help achieve SEPA compliance for such proposals. WAC 197-11-600 provides the criteria and procedure for use of existing environmental documents for SEPA compliance. Background The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan lays out a long-range vision for the future of Federal Way. The comprehensive plan went through a major update in 2015, including updates to portions of Chapter 7, which addresses the City Center subarea. The City Center contains approximately 414 acres and is bound by South 312� Street, South 32e Street, Interstate 5, 11'h Place South, and 13`h Avenue South. The future vision for the City Center states, "the concept is to redevelop the City Center and create a compact urban community and vibrant center of activity. The crux of the strategy is to promote a compact urban center with connections between where we live, work, and recreate, and to create an urban environment that is amenable to walking, bicycling, and transit." In support of this vision, the principal purposes of the City Center chapter are to: • Create an identifiable downtown that is the social and economic focus of the City; • Strengthen the City as a whole by providing for long-term growth in employment and housing; 0 Promote housing opportunities close to employment, shopping, and transit; • Support development of an extensive regional/high capacity transit system; • Reduce dependency on automobiles; • Consume less land with urban development; • Maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services; • Reduce costs of and time required for permitting; • Provide a central gathering place for the community; and • Improve the quality of urban design for all developments. The City Center chapter contains a number of policies intended to help achieve these goals. City Center Policy CCP5 specifically addresses the intent to prepare a Planned Action EIS for the City Center area. The policy states that the City should, "[u]tilize the SEPA Planned Action to provide streamlined permit review in the City Center in order to accelerate progress towards meeting the vision." This SEIS proposal is intended to support the principal purposes of the City Center Chapter and to specifically implement Policy CCP5. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 2-3 Objectives of the Proposal The Proposed Action is intended to achieve the following objectives: • Support the principal objectives of the City Center Chapter of the comprehensive plan, particularly those that promote a more intensive urban style of development in the City Center and the reduction in costs and time required for permitting. • Fulfill the direction of City Center Policy CCPS. • Provide an incentive to development proposals that are consistent with the overall intent of the City Center vision. • Provide greater certainty to potential developers, City decision -makers, and the general public regarding the future development pattern and likely impacts of future development in the City Center area. 2.2 Planned Action Process Planned Action Overview WAC 197-11-164 defines a Planned Action. The City proposes to renew the designation of a portion of the City Center subarea as a Planned Action, pursuant to SEPA and implementing rules. As shown in Figure 1, the project area is bounded on the north by South 3121h Street, on the south by South 324°s Street, on the west by Pacific Highway South, and on the east primarily by 23`d Avenue South. Additional area is located east of 23Td Avenue South, bordered on the north by South 317d' Street and on the south by South 319d' Place. Federal Way will foIIow applicable procedures, described generally below, to review proposed projects within the project area through the land use review process associated with each project to determine their impacts and impose any appropriate development conditions. Planned Action EIS The significant environmental impacts of projects designated as Planned Actions must be identified and adequately analyzed in an EIS (WAC 197-11-164). The City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was issued in 2006. Subsequently, four Addenda to the 2006 EIS have been issued. This Planned Action Supplemental EIS features an update to the transportation analysis for the Planned Action area, in addition to updated information in the land use, public services, and utilities sections. Planned Action Ordinance According to WAC 197-11-168, the ordinance designating the Planned Action shall: ' Describe the type(s) of project action being designated as a Planned Action; z Describe how the Planned Action meets the criteria in WAC 197-11-164 (including specific reference to the EIS that addresses any significant environmental impacts of the planned action); City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 2-4 3. Include a finding that the environmental impacts of the Planned Action have been identified and adequately addressed in the EIS, subject to project review under WAC 197-11-172; and 4. Identify any specific mitigation measures other than applicable development regulations that must be applied to a project for it to qualify as the Planned Action. A Planned Action Ordinance was adopted in 2007 via Ordinance No. 07-547, which included a Planned Action Mitigation Document as Exhibit B. Following the completion of this SEIS process, the City of Federal Way will renew the Planned Action designation by ordinance in 2016. 2.3 Environmental Review City Center Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) The City of Federal Way completed the City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in 2006. Elements of the environment that were considered in the EIS include air quality, land use, aesthetics, light and glare, transportation, public services, and utilities. This Planned Action Supplemental EIS incorporates by reference and supplements the analysis contained in the 2006 City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Draft & Final Environmental Impact Statements, along with the four Addenda to the 2006 EIS that have been issued. 2.4 Proposed Action and Alternative Overview This SEIS evaluates two alternative land use scenarios for the Planned Action area. Alternative 1 (Action) assumes the maximum development identified in Table 2-2. Alternative 2 (No Action) assumes the level of growth established in the comprehensive plan as detailed in Table 2-3. Alternative 1 Land Use. The proposed land use pattern would create a dense, mixed -use downtown with a greater distribution of growth among the different types of development (retail, office, lodging, and residential). The emphasis is on more office, lodging, and residential development downtown than in Alternative 2. Parking would be provided on a project -by -project basis in accordance with FWRC requirements. The total amount of new development anticipated for the Planned Action area under the action alternative is shown in Table 2-2. Table 2-2. Alternative 1 (Action) New Development Through 2025 Uses Total Retail 475,000 sf Office 400,000 sf Lodging 600 rooms Residential 2,400 units Source: City of Federal Way, 2015 City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 2-5 Alternative 2 Land Use. As described in the comprehensive plan, the land use pattern in the City Center project area would be characterized by an intensively developed urban core that includes mixed use, office, retail, and residential development. The emphasis is on the continuation of retail development and addition of residential as the primary focus of growth. Parking would be provided on a project -by - project basis in accordance with FWRC requirements. The total amount of new development for the Planned Action area under the no action alternative is shown in Table 2-3. Overall, anticipated growth under this alternative would be approximately 141 percent of that anticipated for retail development, 65 percent of that anticipated for office development, 0 percent for lodging, and 70 percent of that anticipated for residential development under the action alternative. Table 2-3. Alternative 2 (No Action) New Development Through 2025 Uses Total Retail 672,000 sf Office 262,000 sf Lodging 0 rooms Residential 1,671 units Source: City of Federal Way and Fehr & Peers, 2015 2.5 Benefits and Disadvantages of Delaying the Proposed Action The Proposed Action includes adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance for future development in the City Center subarea. There is no benefit to delaying the implementation of the renewal of the Proposed Action. If the growth itself in the Planned Action area is delayed, that would delay the potential impacts identified in this SEIS, including potential land use conflicts, changes to visual character, increased traffic congestion, and increased demand for public services and utilities. This delay could be considered environmentally beneficial in the short-term. Delay of development would not allow the benefits of establishing a walkable City Center (as discussed in the City's comprehensive plan) to be realized. Delay would not allow new development and associated review processes to benefit from the analysis developed through the Planned Action process. Delaying the extension of the Planned Action impedes permit processing efficiency. Environmental Impact Statements prepared for planned actions more effectively review cumulative effects than individual SEPA reviews. 2.6 Major Issues to be Resolved Adoption of a Planned Action Ordinance would support development and re -development of the area to a more intensive mixed -use character consistent with the comprehensive plan. The key environmental issue facing decision -makers is the impact of additional traffic on area roadways and mitigating measures to address such impacts. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 2-6 Chapter 3 Affected Environment, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.1 Air Quality The 2006 EIS stated that ambient carbon monoxide (CO) impacts are expected to decrease in the future. No further analysis of air quality is contained within this SEIS. Mitigation measures pertaining to air quality proposed in the EIS are incorporated by reference. 3.2 Land Use This section describes the project area's existing land use and analyzes potential impacts resulting from the proposed action and alternative. Affected Environment Overview The City Center project area consists of approximately 215 acres located in downtown Federal Way (see Figure 1, page 2-2). The project area contains a variety of uses, including commercial, office, parking, and multi -family residential uses. Table 3-1 summarizes the existing development in the project area. Table 3-1. Existing Development Planned Action Project Area Commercial (retail, office, restaurant, services) Residential Hotell Total 1,950,234 sf 254 units 230 rooms Source: King County Department of Assessments, 2015. ' Not counted in the commercial sf. Commercial uses, including freestanding retail stores, hotels, retail centers, and services are the predominant land use. Further description is contained in the 2006 EIS and is not duplicated here. Surrounding Land Uses Details on surrounding land uses are contained in the 2006 EIS and are not duplicated here. Vacant and Redevelopable Land Vacant Land Based on a review of the project area and King County Assessor data, approximately seven acres of vacant land exist in the project area. See Figure 2 (next page) for the location of these parcels. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-1 C_;youf Figure 2 : vacant & 'Supplemental Federal ,enRedevelopable Land :;u�,�p�e•��entat EFS 2tI St ■ _ `_ Q: Plaza- f.:�,', y�' i + - � - • M,1 {[ +�w„ Rai �,� ... lam. _ gip. ' A, :.�' { r • .t +fir .'i,•�'• 16 ' Y r S`; } A Park QAa r•... •• �,:.: ,.0 �+saCsr�e� `y - ' ,Y (� �: = 3�3TbG �'�Sr1i• f' i�. • f' , - r...: y. S,3St ' '�" G9fsbraibn`� � _ _.f ��•�,4� �`ti�_"4?��.. ■ .�..._�-•_ its; ;f,' { ' .. _ :�(/3 � - i _ • i �i `• �u -The Commons Federal Way -��►: T ` ..* Y ! = .-- - r ... '•i'�,��..�'I,�' � •x.l. _ ` � raw,.•' ,.......... SY34th St 4' Legend •i�r1` 'c �� r` '� tr+/ `3i' C3r14 and' ��=r �i A • *+y. '�, �-� • ?'� _ .�i �rtf r<edevielop :bra r3� -As r 1 -- - - i ^'' -- +� ! . =. _,l� .. .'` `,� `t• f-ir�• GI _nne-3 :4r..iGf1 _•�H-RA Ai U tli Ce1?:ter Element CITY OF ,�.. Federal Wad Tha:ma is;riernadfor ;,se _aye: as a.gr.apmcal rep;esen:3t�r:. D.: The C:ii_y of Fe-deral Vtay m_kes R:w•rt_-3►-, _Y•S^,..._.__-,-.�-.�-...�-_uer.c. -a sw-.-. v�-...,,._ •Ce«{ no wa.rrane'J a'-- %J -As 3ilcJr3cy- Redevelopable Land The identification of redevelopable land is dependent on a variety of factors, including general and localized economic conditions, perceived market opportunities, and the financial and investment goals of individual property owners. The King County Buildable Lands Report is an analysis, required by the Growth Management Act, which measures capacity to absorb growth in local jurisdictions. For the purpose of this study, jurisdictions in King County were required to establish a methodology for identifying redevelopable land. The approach used by Federal Way compares the value of improvements on a property to the value of the property itself. Properties with relatively low improvement values compared to property values are assumed to be more likely to be redeveloped. In commercial areas, redevelopable properties are identified as those in which the improvement value is 50 percent or less of the property value. This approach was used to identify redevelopable properties in the project area. A total of 84 acres are identified as redevelopable in the project area. See Figure 2 for the location of these parcels. A second measure of the redevelopment potential in the project area would be to consider the potential for development of existing paved surface parking areas. Paved parking is a predominant land use in the Planned Action area. Some portion of these parking areas could be reduced or consolidated into structured parking facilities to allow redevelopment of existing parking areas. If existing paved surface parking areas were considered, the amount of redevelopable land would increase significantly. Based on King County Assessor data, the project area has a combined total of approximately 91 acres of vacant and redevelopable land in the Planned Action area (see Table 3-2). Table 3-2. Vacant and Redevelo able Land Summary Vacant Land' Redevelo able Land2 TOTAL 6.81 acres 83.82 acres 90.63 acres Source: City of Federal Way, 2015. ', Based on King County Assessor's data, 2015. 2. King County Buildable Lands Report methodology; using 2015 King County Assessor data. Land Use Compatibility Existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use & Zoning Code Designations Community Design Standards Details on land use compatibility, comprehensive plan land use and zoning code designations, and community design standards are contained in the 2006 EIS and are not duplicated here. Population, Employment, Housing For the purpose of this analysis, population and employment estimates are based on assumptions for persons per household and employment density for various commercial uses. These assumptions are summarized below in Table 3-3 (next page) and used in the analysis that follows. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-3 Table 3-3. Population and Employment Densities Land Use Density & Conversion Factors Multifamily housing 2.7 persons per household' Retail 500 sf per em Io eez Office 250 sf per em to eel Lodging # roomsl2.36=# em to ees3 Source: City of Federal Way, 2015 5. Based on City of Federal Way 2015 comprehensive plan 6. Based on PSRC conversion factors. 7 Based on City of Federal Way conversion factor. Within the project area, housing and residential population is limited to three multifamily complexes, Steel Lake Apartments, Brightwater Apartments, and Senior City. Based on the estimated population in these three projects, the project area contains approximately 686 residents. The Planned Action area is primarily an employment center and has an estimated employment population of 4,131 (see Table 3-4). At present, the largest component is in the retail sector with 3,766 employees, or 91 percent of the total employment population. Table 3-4. Project Area Existing Employment (# of FTEs) Retail Office/Services Lodging TOTAL 3,766 ± 268 97 4,131 Source: City of Federal Way, 2015 Impacts Land Use Patterns & Population, Employment, Housing Impacts Common to All Alternatives Under all alternatives, the land use pattern in the Planned Action area will intensify and the mix of uses will increase. Over time, the scale of buildings may also increase as new development occurs and is built in a manner consistent with the standards allowed under the Federal Way zoning code. As properties within the Planned Action area redevelop, vacant land, redevelopable, and under- developed land, including surface parking lots, will be utilized. Uses that may be currently separated and buffered from each other will be required to co -exist in closer proximity. Under these circumstances, the potential for land use conflict increases. Land use conflicts can arise when activity levels differ between uses. For example, when noise levels affect adjoining uses, or when building height, bulk, and scale differ greatly between uses. The potential for such conflict will increase with diversity and mix of uses in the Planned Action area. As time goes on; however, the mix of uses will become the norm. Within the Planned Action area, land use compatibility impacts may occur where intensive redevelopment occurs next to existing lower intensity land uses within the project area. These contrasts will be incremental and short-term. Over the period of the Planned Action designation, the contrast between the older one story structures and the redeveloped properties will diminish as the Planned Action area fully develops. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-4 Around the edges of the Planned Action area, adjoining lower intensity uses, such as single and multi -family residential areas, could also experience impacts. However, for residential areas north of the project area, the current City Center Frame (CC-F) zoning designation has development standards intended to ensure a transition to lower intensity uses. In this area, these development standards should mitigate potential land use compatibility impacts. To the south, existing multi- family development directly adjoins the project area. Potential land use conflicts could result if it is intensively developed in the area near these multi -family residences. Alternative 1 As shown in Table 2-1 (page 2-1), new development through 2025 under Alternative 1 (Action) would introduce a total of 475,000 square feet (sq. ft./sf) of new retail space, 400,000 sf of office space, 600 hotel rooms, and 2,400 residential units. Parking would be provided on a project -by - project basis in accordance with FWRC requirements. Existing low scale retail development may be replaced and surface parking areas may be utilized for development. As shown in Table 3-5, Alternative 1 is expected to generate a total new residential population of 6,480 persons and total new employment population of 2,804. The new employment population would have an emphasis on office and retail employment. New office/services jobs would remain the largest employment group, with 1,600 new employees, or 57 percent of total new employment. Table 3-5. Alternatives 1 & 2 Population and Em to ment Proieations Additional Population Alt 1 Total Alt 2 Total Residential 6,480 4,512 Additional Jobs Alt 1 Total Alt 2 Total Office/Services 1,600 1,048 Retail 950 1,344 Lodging 254 0 Total New Employment 2,804 2,392 Source: City of Federal Way, 2015 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 (No Action) assumes a total increase of 672,000 sf of retail space, 262,000 sf of office space, and 1,671 residential units. Alternative 2 would result in increased development in the project area, but to a lesser degree than Alternative 1. Table 3-5 identifies the residential and employment population that could result from development under Alternative 2. Compared to the action alternative, Alternative 2 would result in less residential and employment population. Alternative 2 would generate 4,512 new residents and 2,392 new employees, compared to 6,480 new residents and 2,804 new employees under the action alternative. Over half of the new employment created under Alternative 2 would be in the retail sector. Mitigation Measures Existing development standards along the edges of the Planned Action area appear to be adequate to allow for a compatible transition from more intensive to less intensive uses. However, as development occurs, this transition area should be evaluated to confirm that long-term land use City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-5 compatibility impacts are not being created. If necessary, new development standards for edge areas should be considered. Techniques could include site and building lighting limits, requirements for landscaping, noise control, and other measures. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No significant unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated. 3.3 Aesthetics, Light, and Glare The 2006 EIS stated that other than change itself, no significant unavoidable adverse impacts to aesthetics, light, and glare were anticipated. The design standards, guidelines, and mitigation measures, together with the City's development regulations, are adequate to mitigate the significant adverse impacts anticipated with redevelopment. No further analysis of aesthetics, light, and glare is contained within this SEIS. Mitigation measures pertaining to aesthetics, light, and glare proposed in the 2006 EIS are incorporated by reference. 3.4 Transportation The purpose of this section is to describe the transportation impacts associated with development under the proposed Planned Action designation in Federal Way's City Center. This section assesses the expected impacts on the City's transportation systems, including roadways and intersections, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian facilities, and identifies actions and improvements to mitigate the impacts. The transportation analysis is a summary of the full transportation impact analysis report, included with this document as Appendix 2. This section summarizes the analysis of the following alternatives: • 2015 Existing Conditions. a 2025 No Action Alternative includes an increase in land use in the City Center area. It assumes the funded Transportation Improvement Projects would be completed in the study area. ■ 2025 Action Alternative includes an increase in land use over the No Action Alternative for Federal Way's City Center and the same funded Transportation Improvement Project projects. The primary difference between the future No Action and Action alternatives is the land use mix. The Action Alternative provides an increase in the amount of office space, residential, and hotel space, with a lesser emphasis on retail. Table 3-6 displays the land use mix by alternative. Table 3-6. Land Use Mix by Alternative Retail (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Residential units Hotel rooms Existing 1.833.189 67,045 254 230 No Action 2,505,379 329,427 1,925 230 Action 2,308,190 467,045 2.654 830 City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-6 Affected Environment This section summarizes the selection of the study area, existing roadway network, the project area, and existing land use. This section summarizes the findings of the traffic operations of existing intersections and collisions analysis. The existing transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities are also described. Study Area The study area, which is larger than the Planned Action Area, was developed by using the City's travel demand model to calculate the anticipated vehicle volume increase at intersections. Study intersections were identified for analysis if they met the following conditions: PM Peak Hour: Intersection is signalized and outside the City Center with an increase of 30 or more vehicle trips and a volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio over 0.7. All intersections surrounding the City Center area were included in the study area provided they met the City's threshold. AM and Saturday Mid -Day Peak Hours: Intersection is anticipated to experience an increase of 100 or more vehicle trips. All intersections surrounding the City Center that were included in the PM analysis were included in AM and Saturday analysis. The study area intersections are presented in Table 3-7. A percentage of total trips generated from the City Center area was used to determine the intersections potentially impacted by the development. More intersections were analyzed during the PM peak hour because vehicle volumes were greater compared to the AM and Saturday Midday peak hours. Also, this provided a more conservative analysis of the overall study area. Table 3-7. Study Intersections Included in Analyses Intersection PM AM Saturday *S 272,d St & Military Rd S X X S 2881h St & Pacific Hwy S X X S 28&h St & Military Rd S X X SW 320u, St & 21,1 Ave SW X X S 320th St & 1 11 Ave S X X X S 3Wh St & 1-5 SB Ramp X X X S 3201h St & 1-5 NB Ramp X X X S 3201h St & Military Rd S X X X SW 336f St & 2191 Ave SW X S 3361h St & Pacific Hwy S X X X SW 34VI St & Hoyt Rd SW X SW Campus Dr & 15' Ave S X S 348I St & Pacific Hwy S X X X S 3481h St & SR 161 X X SW 3561' St & 215t Ave SW X S 35VI St & 1 st Ave S X S 35&h St & Pacific Hwy S X X X City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-7 Intersection PM AM Saturday S 3561h St & Enchanted Pkwy S X X **S 3121h St & 281^ Ave S X X S 316h St & Pacific Hwy S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 3121h St & Pacific Hwy S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 3201h St & Pacific Hwy S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 3201h St & 201h Ave S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 320�h St & 23rd Ave S X - CC X - CC X - CC S 324th St & Pacific Hwy S X - CC X - CC X - CC Number of Intersections Analyzed 25 18 15 X: Study area intersection included in analysis X-CC: denotes City Center intersection included in analysis * Intersection is located outside of City of Federal Way limits ** Unsignalized Intersection Existing Roadway Network The existing street network around the City Center is mostly grid -like with four legged intersections. Interstate-5 (I-5), Pacific Highway/State Route 99 (SR 99), and State Route 161 (SR 161) are in the study area and provide regional access to the north and south. Access ramps to I-5 are provided at 272°d Street, 320th Street, and 3481h Street. I-5 is a limited access facility that provides four general purpose lanes and a high occupancy vehicle lane in each direction. The posted speed limit is 60 miles per hour. Pacific Highway South (SR 99) is a Principal Arterial with five to seven travel lanes, including HOV lanes and turning lanes at intersections. The posted speed limit on SR 99 is 40 mph south of South 304`h Street and 45 mph north of South 300 Street. SR 99 provides access to Seattle and SeaTac International Airport to the north and the City of Tacoma to the south. SR 161 provides access to the City of Puyallup. It is a five lane arterial with a posted speed limit ranging from 40 mph to 45 mph. South 272nd Street is a Principal Arterial that runs east -west and provides the City limits to the north. South 272nd Street provides access to SR 99 at a signalized intersection, as well as ramps to access I-5 northbound and southbound. The roadway has four travel lanes with additional turn lanes. South 320th Street is a Principal Arterial that runs east -west. The roadway has seven travel lanes in the City Center and five travel lanes outside of the City Center, with additional turning lanes at intersections. The roadway provides access to SR 99 at a signalized intersection and access ramps to I-5 northbound and southbound. South 320`h Street between SR 99 and I-5 carries over 35,000 vehicles per day. South 348th Street is a Principal Arterial that runs east -west; it becomes SW Campus Drive west of 151 Avenue South and SR 18 east of Pacific Highway South. South 348' Street has five travel lanes. SR 18 is a state owned divided highway with two to four lanes in each direction. The roadway provides regional access continuing east through Auburn and northeast to I-90 in Snoqualmie. Project Area and Existing Land Use The City Center project area is bounded by South 324`h Street to the south, 23rd Avenue South to the east, South 312th Street to the north, and SR 99 to the west. The City Center area is a mix of City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-8 retail, office, senior housing, multi -family households, and hotels. This area provides the greatest concentration of shopping and businesses in the City of Federal Way. There are also businesses located on the west side of SR 99 and the area outside of the City Center is mostly residential. The square footage of the City Center is summarized in Table 3-8. Table 3-8. Existing Land Use Retail (sq ft) Office (sq ft) Residential Hotel (units) (rooms) 2015 Existing Conditions 1,833,189 67,045 254 230 Corridor Right -of -Way FWRC 1.05.020 defines right-of-way as, "land owned, dedicated, or conveyed to the public or a unit of government, used primarily for the movement of vehicles or pedestrians and providing for access to adjacent parcels, with the secondary purpose of providing space for utility lines and appurtenances and other devices and facilities benefiting the public. Right-of-way includes, but is not limited to, any street, easement, sidewalk, or portion thereof under the jurisdiction of the city." The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan provides a network of "City Center" roadways that meet the higher level of amenities for the City Center planning area. The need for wider sidewalks, bicycle lanes, street lighting, and street trees resulted in the City designating specific standards for City Center roadways. Table 3-9 summarizes the required and the typical amounts of right-of- way found on major roadways within the City Center planning area. Table 3-9. Right -of -Way for Major Area Streets Roadway Required City Center Right -of -Way Existing Right -of -Way Pacific Hwy S (SR 99) 120 ft 100-140 ft S 3241h St 96 ft 66 ft S 3201h St 100 ft 100-140 ft S 316t' St 74 ft 60 fe S 312th St 85 ft 60-85 ft 20th Ave S 60 ft 60 ft 23rd Ave S 85 ft 80-82 ft Source: King County Assessor 2003 As summarized in Table 3-9, Pacific Highway South, South 324`h Street, South 3 1 e Street, South 312d` Street, and 23`d Avenue South all have inadequate right-of-way. In addition, the City Center plan calls for a number of internal roadways to create smaller blocks that will improve the grid network and improve the access for pedestrians and vehicles. These internal grid roads require 70 feet of right-of-way with two vehicle lanes, 12 feet of sidewalks, and on -street parking. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements shall be a component of the development submittal phase of a proposed project within the City Center. Additional information on ultimate roadway cross -sections can be found in Map III-4 of the transportation chapter of the City's comprehensive plan. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-9 Existing Traffic Operations Traffic counts were collected in Fall 2014, or July 8, 2015, between 4:00 pm and 6:00 pm, and Wednesday, July 8, 2015, between 6:00 am and 8:00 am. Saturday traffic counts were collected July 11, 2015, between 11:00 am and 1:00 pm. The analysis of intersections was completed for the highest hour of vehicle traffic for the AM, PM, and Saturday midday peak hours. In 2015, the City of Federal Way revised their level of service (LOS) standard for intersections. This standard is used to determine whether an intersection is operating at an acceptable condition. The standard provides a volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio compared to the previous intersection average vehicle delay (also known as LOS). The current standard states that signalized intersections should have a v/c ratio less than 1.2 outside of the City Center, or less than 1.0 at any unsignalized intersection. Signalized intersections inside of the City Center should experience an average v/c ratio of 1.1 or less. An intersection with a v/c ratio greater than the standard is considered deficient and would require mitigation to bring the intersection into acceptable conditions. The traffic analysis software, Synchro 8, was used to calculate the v/c ratios by reporting results using the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 outputs. The v/c ratio is determined for intersections using this methodology because it provides an overall v/c ratio for signalized intersections. The unsignalized intersection of South 312'h Street and 28"' Avenue South was analyzed using this methodology, and the approach movement with the highest v/c ratio is reported. Table 3-10 summarizes the results of the intersection operations analysis, including intersection LOS, average intersection vehicle delay, and v/c ratio. None of the intersections were found to be deficient. The intersection geometries, existing intersection traffic counts, future turning movement forecasts, and LOS summaries are found in Appendix 2. Table 3-10. Existing Conditions Intersection Analysis Results Study Intersections PM Peak Hour LOS Delay R do AM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay Ratio LOS ` Delay VC Ratio "S 272th St & Military Rd S D 48.9 0.83 D 44.7 0.73 S 288h St & Military Rd S D 51.7 0.74 D 39.8 0.51 S 2W, St & Pacific Hwy S D 43.3 0.73 C 24.6 0.48 "'S 3121h Street & 281^ Ave S D 32.3 0.93 A 8.8 0.29 S 3201h St & 1 Ave S D 54.2 0.83 C 32.9 0.62 C 33.9 0.63 S 3201h St & 1-5 NB Ramp C 21.6 0.66 B 11.5 0.48 B 14.6 0.58 S 320h St & 1-5 SB Ramp C 30.2 0.70 B 11.9 0.56 B 18.4 0.69 S 320t^ St & Military Rd S D 53.2 0.79 C 29.9 0.69 D 48.5 0.67 S 3361h St & Pacific Hwy S D 53.3 0.86 D 44.4 0.50 C 21.7 0.51 S 348t^ St & Pacific Hwy S E 64.4 0.86 C 34.1 0.70 D 52.9 0.89 S 3481h St & SR 161 E 72.6 0.97 E 78.5 1.08 S 3561h St & 1 11 Ave S D 44.9 0.91 S 356'h St & Enchanted Pkwy S D 43.6 0.84 C 25.7 0.62 S 3561h St & Pacific Hwy S D 53.6 0.87 D 37.8 1 0.47 1 D 53.2 0.80 SW 3Wh St & 21s' Ave SW D 41.6 0.80 C 31.4 1 0.52 City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-10 PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour Study Intersections LOS Delay Ratio LOS Delay Ratio LOS Delay VIC Ratio SW 3Nh St & 2111 Ave SW D 49.3 0.72 SW 3401h St & Hoyt Rd SW C 34.6 0.76 SW 3561h St & 2111 Ave SW E 55.1 0.79 SW Campus Dr & 15t Ave S D 42.5 0.64 S 3121h St & Pacific Hwy S D 54.9 0.73 C 20.3 0.39 D 42.3 0.58 S 3161h St & Pacific Hwy S D 54.7 0.69 A 7.8 0.22 C 28.8 0.59 S 320th St & 20th Ave S C 34.6 0.74 A 7.7 0.32 D 36.1 0.67 S 3201h St & 23rd Ave S D 48.3 0.81 C 25.3 0.53 C 30.1 0.66 S 320'h St & Pacific Hwy S E 57.1 0.75 C 23.1 0.47 D 37.2 0.74 S 324�h St & Pacific Hwy S D 48.0 0.82 B 18.1 0.32 D 35.6 0.71 Average VIC City Center 0.76 0.40 0.67 " Intersection is located outside of City of Federal Way limits "Unsignalized Intersection Parking The existing number of parking stalls in the City Center area reflects the more auto -oriented development pattern of current land uses. Table 3-11 summarizes the number of parking spaces required by City code for each existing land use. Table 3-11. Existing Parking Requirements Retail Office Residential (units) Hotel (rooms) Total Spaces Per Code (sq ft) (sq ft) City Code 1 per 300 sq ft 1 per 300 sq ft 1.7 per unit 1 per room Existing Square Footage 1,833,189 67,045 254 230 Existing Parking Requirement per Code 6,111 223 432 230 6,996 Data provided by the City estimates that there are approximately 8,960 parking stalls provided in the City Center area. As summarized in Table 3-11, nearly 2,000 additional parking stalls are provided above what existing code requires. Collision Analysis Review of historical collision data provides an indication of the location and severity of incidents at intersections and along corridors. Historical analysis is useful in understanding the typical types of collisions that occur at a particular location; however, the data may not be indicative of future collision rates or causes. A number of factors can contribute to collisions including: • Traffic congestion (ability to maneuver) ■ Driver skills (driver age and experience) • Driver behavior (speeding, aggressiveness, driving while intoxicated) ■ Roadway geometrics (sight distance) • Weather conditions (rain, glare, snow) • Nature (animals, fallen trees) City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-11 ■ Vehicle condition, equipment, and maintenance (brakes, tires) • Roadway condition (pavement condition) Five years of collision data, 2010 through 2014, were analyzed to identify collision trends in the study area. The City requires the identification of high collision intersections and roadway corridors defined as follows: • A collision rate of more than 1.0 collision per million entering vehicles (MEV) at an intersection. • A collision rate of more than 10.0 collisions per million vehicle miles (MVM) on a roadway segment. Roadway segments are defined as arterials and principal collectors between and including intersections of collectors and arterials. Table 3-12 provides the calculated collision rates for the study intersections and roadway segments. Results indicate that three of the 23 intersections and one of the 15 roadway segments could be considered to have high collision rates. The City has either improved or planned to improve these locations to address high collision rates. Table 3-12. Five -Year Collision Rates (2010 — 2014) Intersection' Total Collisions Collision Rate (MEV)z S 288th St & Military Rd S 60 0.99 S 2881^ St & Pacific Hwy S 47 0.55 S 3120, St & 281h Ave S 10 0.45 S 320th St & 15' Ave S 65 0.89 S 3201h St & 1-5 NB Ramp 7 0.09 S 3201h St & 1-5 SB Ramp 25 0.29 S 336 , St & Pacific Hwy S 62 0.68 S 348'h St & Pacific Hwy S 36 0.32 S 3481h St & SR 161 82 0.58 S 356�1 St & I s' Ave S 21 0.38 S 356th St & Enchanted Pkwy S 24 0.39 S 356'h St & Pacific Hwy S 37 0.44 SW 320h St & 2111 Ave SW 45 0.66 SW 3361h St & 2111 Ave SW 79 1.12 SW 3401h St & Hoyt Rd SW 28 0.65 SW 3561h St & 211i Ave SW 25 0.43 SW Campus Dr & 111 Ave S 38 0.56 S 3121h St & Pacific Hwy S 106 1.36 S 3161h St & Pacific Hwy S 57 0.86 S 3Wh St & 201h Ave S 45 0.61 S 3201h St & 23,d Ave S 73 0.81 S 3201h St & Pacific Hwy S 125 1.09 S 324ffi St & Pacific Hwy S 43 0.57 City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SETS 3-12 Roadway Segment Total Collisions Collision Rate (MVM)z 215t Ave SW from SR 509 to S 3561h St 233 3.03 1st Ave S from S 3120 St to S 3561h St 191 3.73 SR 99 from S 272nd St to S 3561h St 1006 3.87 20Lh Ave S from S 3121h St to S 3201^ St 50 8.94 2311 Ave S from S 3121h St to S 322nd St 88 8.52 281h Ave S from S 312ih St to S 3171h St 8 2.93 S 3121h St from SR 99 to 281h Ave S 131 9.76 S 3161h St from SR 99 to 23rd Ave S 50 11.85 S 3171h St between 231d Ave S and 28I Ave S 8 2.85 S 3201h St from 1st Ave S to Military Rd 555 4.81 SW 320f St from Hoyt Rd to 1st Ave S 125 1.34 S 348Lh St from 151 Ave S to 1-5 182 3.12 SW Campus Dr from 21stAve SW to 111 Ave S 173 2.71 SW 3401h13361h St from Hoyt Rd to 21 St Ave SW 165 4.66 S 3561h St from 1 st Ave S to 16t^ Ave S/Enchanted Pkw 102 4.29 Source: City of Federal Way Collision Database t The City does not maintain data for the study intersections at S 272M St & Military Rd S and S 3201h St & Military Rd S 2 MEV = million entering vehicles; MVM = million vehicle miles Note: Bold values indicate high collision locations, as defined by City standards. The City of Federal Way, in general, attributes the majority of collisions to congestion at roadways and intersections. The congestion related delay at intersections can result in driver risk -taking by attempting to reduce wait times. Improving mobility and access to all modes, reducing conflict points, and reducing travel delay may reduce some types of collision along the corridor. The City traffic engineering division monitors collision data and corrects roadway and intersection issues that could contribute to higher collision rates at specific locations. Transit Services The Federal Way Transit Center is located within the City Center on South 317t' Street between 21" Avenue South and 23`d Avenue South. Within the study area, South 324th Street, South 320'h Street, and South 312`h Street are used to access the Transit Center. The Transit Center is served by Sound Transit routes 574, 577, and 578; King -County Metro routes Rapid Ride A, 179, 181, 182, 183, 187, 193, and 197; and Pierce Transit routes 402, 500, and 501. Bicycle lockers and 1,190 vehicle parking spaces are provided at the Transit Center. The parking lot is heavily used during the weekday. The Transit Center provides direct access to high -occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on I-5. Several bus routes stop in Federal Way, with 3,000 to 3,500 person trips made by public transit service each day. About three percent of peak hour trips within Federal Way are transit trips. Pedestrian Facilities The City of Federal Way has pedestrian connectivity with sidewalks on many streets in the study area. The Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Trail is a paved pedestrian trail that connects City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-13 residential areas to parks. Although there are sidewalks connecting the residential area with the City Center, walking is not a popular mode choice to shopping because of the high volume and high speed of vehicles on the roadway network and the relatively long distance between destinations. Bicycle Facilities The City's bicycle network consists of a range of facilities including bike lanes, wide shoulders, and the BPA Trail. The BPA Trail provides a connection for cyclists to the City Center. However, cyclists must cross SR 99, which may be a deterrent. Within the City of Federal Way, cyclists can bike on the sidewalk, except in the City Center where it is prohibited by ordinance. When surveyed as part of the comprehensive plan update, residents cited a lack of bicycle infrastructure as the main cycling deterrent. Future Conditions This section summarizes the transportation effects within the study area and at the City Center. It includes a summary of the land use assumed for the alternatives and roadway improvement assumptions. Future Year Land Use The Action Alternative proposes a mixed use development, which would provide the variety of land uses to create an urban center within Federal Way. The difference between the No Action and Action Alternatives is the land use assumptions in the City Center; the Action Alternative assumes an increase over the No Action Alternative. Table 3-13 summarizes the land use quantities for the alternatives. The land use in the rest of the City and the greater Puget Sound Region is the same for both alternatives. Table 3-13. City Center Land Use Future No Action and Action Alternatives Retail (sq ft) Office (sq ft) Residential (units) Hotel (rooms) Existing 1,833,189 67,045 254 230 No Action 2,505,379 329,427 1,925 230 Action 1 2,308,189 467,045 2,654 1 830 Roadway Improvements Assumptions The City's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) highlights funded projects through the year 2040. Ten of the study intersections are expected to have funded planned projects between 2015 and 2025. Table 3-14 summarizes the projects assumed to be constructed by 2025 for both alternatives. Table 3-15 summarizes the specific improvements planned for study intersections. Table 3-14. Transportation Improvement Projects through 2025 Project Location Description A 101h Ave SW @ SW Campus Dr Add SB right -turn lane B SR 99 @ S 3121h St Add 2nd left -turn lane NB C S 300 St @ 281h Ave S Add NB right -turn lane, signal D SW 3200 St @ 21 sl Ave SW Add 2M WB left -turn lane, interconnect to 260 Ave SW E S 3120 St @ 281h Ave S Add SB right -turn lane City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-14 Project Location Description F SW 336'h Way/SW 3401" St (261h PI SW to Hoyt Road SW) Widen to 5 lanes, add signal at 2611 PI SW G SE 509 @ 111h PI S Add EB left -turn lane H S 3561h St (SR 99 to SR 161) Widen to 5 lanes I S 356th St @ SR 161 Add 2nd NB left to SR 161 J S 320tt, St 15' Ave S o� Add EBL, WBL, WBR, NBT, SBR; widen to 5 lanes N to 3161h or Alternative Measure K S 320'h St @ 1-5 Bridge Widening Add HOV lanes, realign ramps in SE quadrant L SW 3441h St (121h Ave SW to 21It Ave SW) Extend 3 lane principal collector M S 352nd St (SR 99 to SR 161) Extend 3 lane principal collector N SR 99: S 340tt, St to S 3561h St Construct arterial HOV lanes, both directions 0 MilitaryS 342nd St Rd @ Add NB left -turn lane at the intersection and a two way left turn lane between S. 3401h St and S. 342nd St P SR 99 @ S 348th St Add 2nd SB left turn lane Table 3-15. Changes to Study Intersection from TIP Intersection Improvement Description SR 99 @ S 3121h St Add 2nd left -turn lane NB SW 3201h St @ 21It Ave SW Add 2nd WB left -turn lane S 3120, St @ 281h Ave S Add SB right -turn lane SW 3401h St @ Hoyt Rd SW Add WB lane, separate through and left lane. S 3561h St @ SR 161 Add 2nd NB left to SR 161 S 3201h St @ 1 It Ave S Restrict left turns on all approaches S 3201^ St @ 1-5 SB Add through lane on S 320'^ St, both directions S 3201h St @ 1-5 NB Add through lane on S 3201^ St, both directions SR 99 @ S 356th St Add northbound through lane SR 99 @ S 348t' St Add 2nd southbound left turn lane Trip Generation Trip generation rates for the alternatives were developed using a travel demand forecasting model and Fehr & Peers MainStreet tool. A travel demand forecasting model is a computer model developed to project traffic volumes and patterns based upon land use and the characteristics of the transportation system. The roadway network under study, as well as the land use that generates traffic on that network, is coded into the model. The model projects traffic on the roadway system based on observed traffic data and statistical data that associates typical travelers' tendencies with land use. A model of existing conditions is first created and calibrated according to observed existing traffic volumes and patterns. Once a calibrated model is completed, it can be used to project the traffic volumes and patterns of future land use and transportation network scenarios. The traffic demand model for this study was created using EMME software. Separate Federal Way travel demand model runs were developed for the 2025 No Action and 2025 Action Alternatives to reflect how their land use assumptions would influence travel behavior in the future. The model assumed the same future roadway improvements for both alternatives. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-15 The MainStreet tool was developed to more accurately predict trip generation in mixed use suburban centers such as Federal Way's City Center. MainStreet evaluates whether a reduction rate in new vehicle trips from the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual could be applied. This method supplements the travel demand model by recognizing how built environment variables including density, diversity of land uses, destinations (accessibility), development scale, pedestrian and bicycle design, distance to transit services, and demographics affect travel. Places with higher densities, a rich variety of land uses close to one another, and high quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit environments have lower vehicle trip generation rates. People have more choices in terms of both the travel mode as well as how far they must travel to reach various destinations. The level of vehicle trip reduction applied to the City Center varied among the two alternatives, based on the land uses assumed. This approach is consistent with best practices in transportation analysis, as documented by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (Report 684). Table 3-16 summarizes the trip generation for the two alternatives. Table 3-16. Trip Generation by Alternative 2025 No Action 2025 Action Change from 2025 2015 Existing Alternative Alternative No Action to Action Alternative Retail 1450 1817 1789 -28 Office 87 388 466 +78 AM Peak Hour Hotel 100 93 334 +241 Residential 88 742 1028 +286 Total 1,725 3,040 3,617 +577 Retail 4347 5542 4923 -619 Office 81 371 401 +30 PM Peak Hour Hotel 112 105 341 +236 Residential 105 901 1127 +226 Total 4,645 6,919 6,792 -127 Trip Generation Differences Explained The 2025 Action Alternative is anticipated to have more trips than the No Action Alternative in the AM peak hour (approximately 580 trips), but fewer trips (approximately 130 trips) in the PM peak hour. The increase in AM peak hour trips results from the increase in land use and lower number of trips occurring within the City Center. The decrease in PM peak hour trips is because more trips occur within the City Center area, which is referred to as the internal capture rate. It indicates that more people choose to walk, bike, or drive between land uses that are within the City Center. Trip Distribution and Assignment The trip distribution was based on the EMME Federal Way travel demand model; trip distribution provides an assessment of the number of people traveling to and from the site. The Saturday midday peak hour trip distribution was assumed to be the same as the PM peak hour trip distribution. The trip distribution was similar between the No Action and Action alternatives. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-16 Impacts This section summarizes the transportation effects within the study area. It describes the project's impact on traffic operations, safety, transit service, and pedestrian and bicycle mobility. Traffic Operations Impact Common to All Alternatives For the analysis, each of the signalized study intersections was analyzed using a 140 second cycle length in the PM peak hour and Saturday midday peak hour, and a 120 second cycle length for the AM peak hour. This is consistent with the City of Federal Way's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses (September 9, 2014). No Action Alternative Table 3-17 provides the operations analysis for the No Action Alternative. As summarized in Table 3-17, none of the intersections are anticipated to be deficient based on the City of Federal Way's traffic operations standards with programmed improvements. However, it is worth noting that some of the intersections exceed the LOS standards defined by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC): • S 288t" St & Pacific Hwy S • S 320`h St & Pacific Hwy S • S 324`h St & Pacific Hwy S • S 336`h St & Pacific Hwy S • S 348h St & Pacific Hwy S • S 356`h St & Pacific Hwy S • S 348 h St & SR 161 To correct the LOS deficiencies at these locations, Federal Way and WSDOT could widen the roads and add capacity. These types of capacity additions were considered as part of the recent comprehensive plan update, but were considered infeasible for the following reasons: Roadway expansion projects for drive alone vehicles were inconsistent with City Center Plan goals for a more walkable, accessible, and transit oriented community. Extensive right of way impacts. Longer traffic signal cycle lengths (because of wider roadways), which would make it more difficult for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross the street and potentially increase driver frustration with longer wait times at the signals. The objective of the Action Alternative is to create an urban form and development pattern that encourages less auto use and provides for a more walkable and bikeable environment. Therefore, the land use pattern and supporting transportation network investments for the City Center have been developed to reduce overall auto trip generation and driving compared to the No Action Alternative. As shown in the following section, the results of the traffic impact analysis support the notion that a higher density, transit supportive land use plan for City Center has fewer traffic operations impacts than the No Action Alternative during the PM peak hour. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-17 Table 3-17. 2025 No Action Alternative Operations Analysis Study Intersection PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay VIC Ratio LOS Delay VIC Ratio LOS Delay VIC Ratio "S 272nd St & Military Rd S F 91.0 1.11 D 49.9 0.90 S 2886 St & Military Rd S E 65.4 0.99 C 27.2 0.66 S 28&h St & Pacific Hwy S F 124.4 1.01 F 112.4 0.94 -S 3121h St & 28 h Ave S E 47.1 0.97 C 18.3 0.74 S 3201h St & 1 st Ave S C 27.3 0.69 C 28.9 0.72 C 22.4 0.61 S 3201h St & 1-5 NB Ramp B 16.9 0.61 C 22.5 0.78 B 14.8 0.52 S 3206 St & 1-5 SB Ramp D 42.3 0.78 C 31.1 0.55 C 30.8 0.75 S 3201h St & Military Rd S E 65.4 0.97 D 49.8 0.83 D 41.2 0.70 S 3361h St & Pacific Hwy S E 59.0 1.06 D 42.3 0.73 C 28.7 0.63 S 3481h St & Pacific Hwy S F 91.5 1.09 E 70.4 0.77 F 93.6 1.13 S 348'h St & SR 161 F 87.8 1.08 F 95.4 1.14 S 3561h St & 1 si Ave S E 76.7 1.09 S 3561h St & Enchanted Pkwy S D 49.0 0.87 C 34.7 0.76 S 350h St & Pacific Hwy S E 67.8 1.07 E 69.8 0.61 D 52.7 0.87 SW 3201h St & 2111 Ave SW E 59.0 0.94 D 52.5 0.95 SW 3366 St & 21s' Ave SW E 64.4 0.96 SW 3*h St & Hoyt Rd SW D 44.2 0.82 SW 356th St & 211' Ave SW F 85.4 0.96 SW Campus Dr & Is' Ave S D 54.5 0.83 S 3121h St & Pacific Hwy S D 51.4 0.86 D 39.1 0.72 D 36.4 0.74 S 31 &h St & Pacific Hwy S C 31.0 0.79 B 14.4 0.42 C 36.6 0.72 S 32Dh St & 20th Ave S C 32.7 0.81 B 19.2 0.46 D 36.5 0.80 S 3201h St & 23,d Ave S E 60.3 1.00 D 39.1 0.80 E 59.1 0.93 S 3201h St & Pacific Hwy S E 61.7 0.94 E 55.2 0.80 E 63.7 0.94 S 3241h St & Pacific Hwy S E 65.1 1.01 C 25.3 0.68 D 50.8 0.90 City Center Average VIC 0.91 0.68 0.85 " Intersection is located outside of City of Federal Way limits Unsignalized Intersection Action Alternative Table 3-18 provides the operations analysis for the Action Alternative. As shown, the Action Alternative does not degrade the LOS of any of the study intersections to be worse than the No Action Alternative. Overall, the level of intersection delay is less during the PM peak hour at all but three intersections for the Action Alternative. In these instances, the delay increase is approximately three seconds and the LOS grade is unchanged. Based on these findings, the Action Alternative does not have a significant impact on traffic operations. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-18 Table 3-18. 2025 Action Alternative Operations Analysis Study Intersection PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Saturday Midday Peak Hour LOS Delay VIC Ratio LOS Delay VIC Ratio LOS Delay VIC Ratio *S 272nd St & Military Rd S F 90.6 1.11 D 50.1 0.91 S 2881' St & Military Rd S E 64.4 0.99 C 27.6 0.67 S 2881h St & Pacific Hwy S F 121.3 1.00 F 121.2 0.96 **S 3121h St & 28h Ave S E 47.4 0.97 C 18.7 0.72 S 320th St & Is' Ave S C 27.2 0.69 C 29.0 0.73 C 24.7 0.61 S 3201h St & 1-5 NB Ramp B 17.6 0.60 C 22.4 0.79 B 15.0 0.52 S 320�h St & 1-5 SB Ramp C 33.1 0.79 C 31.4 0.57 D 46.6 0.79 S 3201h St & Military Rd S E 65.8 0.97 D 50.1 0.86 D 45.4 0.70 S 3361h St & Pacific Hwy S E 57.4 1.03 D 45.3 0.75 C 31.4 0.62 S 3481h St & Pacific Hwy S F 95.0 1.09 E 66.9 0.78 E 66.7 0.94 S 3481h St & SR 161 F 88.8 1.08 F 96.4 1.14 S 3560 St & 15t Ave S E 77.1 1.10 S 356�h St & Enchanted Pkwy S D 46.7 0.86 D 41.2 0.75 S 3561h St & Pacific Hwy S E 66.7 1.06 E 62.7 0.60 D 52.5 0.87 SW 3201h St & 21sl Ave SW E 57.2 0.92 D 54.8 0.99 SW 33V St & 21 s' Ave SW E 64.3 0.96 SW 3400 St & Hoyt Rd SW D 43.7 0.81 SW 356�h St & 215l Ave SW F 83.5 0.95 SW Campus Dr & 1 sl Ave S D 53.7 0.85 S 3121h St & Pacific Hwy S D 53.5 0.88 D 38.5 0.75 D 48.2 0.76 S 3Th St & Pacific Hwy S C 33.7 0.81 B 16.2 0.44 D 35.7 0.73 S 320th St & 20th Ave S C 32.1 0.82 C 22.1 0.48 D 36.4 0.81 S 320th St & 23rd Ave S E 61.4 1.00 D 41.8 0.83 E 59.2 0.95 S 3201h St & Pacific Hwy S E 60.5 0.95 E 60.8 0.83 E 59.0 0.93 S 3240 St & Pacific Hwy S E 59.3 1.00 C 24.8 0.68 D 50.1 0.89 City Center Average VIC 0.92 0.70 0.86 * Intersection is located outside of City of Federal Way limits "Unsignalized Intersection The operations analysis shows that the Future No Action and Future Action result in very similar impact on the study intersections. Future Parking Requirements Common to All Alternatives As summarized in Table 3-19, both the No Action and Action Alternatives would require additional parking spaces per code requirements for new development. These increases assume full development of the City Center. Almost 15,000 parking spaces would be required to meet the proposed Action Alternative. The number of parking spaces represents the City's parking code requirements. Parking would be provided on a project -by -project basis in accordance with FWRC requirements. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-19 Table 3-19. Future Parking Requirements Retail Office Residential Hotel Total Parking (sq ft) (sq ft) (units) (rooms) Spaces per Code City Code Requirement 1 per 300 sq ft 1 per 300 sq ft 1.7 per unit 1 per room Action Land Use 2,308,189 467,045 2,654 830 Action Parking Spaces Needed 7,694 1,557 4,512 830 14,593 No Action Land Use 2,505.379 329,427 1,925 230 No Action Parking Spaces Needed 8,351 1,098 3,273 230 12,952 Traffic Safety Impact Common to All Alternatives The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan identifies that congestion is a common contributing factor to vehicle collisions. As the amount of traffic increases within the area, the probability of traffic collisions would be expected to increase as well. Congestion is a primary factor in collision rates. However, the City and WSDOT have made investments in the study area in an on -going effort to reduce the number of preventable accidents that occur. It is anticipated that through these investments, the number of serious and preventable accidents would decrease. Both the Action and No Action Alternatives would increase the total vehicle volume of vehicles at the high collision locations identified in Table 3-12 (page 3-12). Compared to the No Action Alternative, the Action Alternative would result in fewer added trips during the PM peak hour, the period of highest traffic congestion during a typical day. The alternatives also make up only a small portion of the entering trips for the surrounding intersections. In addition, roadway improvements designed to reduce congestion may lower congestion associated collisions. Transit Service Impact Common to All Alternatives In the next ten years, demand for transit service in the City Center is expected to increase with the increase in jobs and households. Transit demand is to be addressed as part of the City's comprehensive plan. The City has identified SR 99 and South 320`' Street, along with 21S` Avenue SW and 16'' Avenue South as transit priority corridors. Action Alternative For this alternative, the increase in households and office space compared to the No Action Alternative is anticipated to increase demand for transit service in the City Center. Pedestrian and Bicycle Mobility Impact Common to All Alternatives The land use mix for the No Action and Action Alternatives encourages walking and bicycling in and around the City Center. The City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan adopted in March 2012 highlights planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the City. All roads within the City Center either have an existing sidewalk or have been identified as a location for proposed sidewalks. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-20 Some roads around the City Center, including South 324n` Street, South 308t' Street, and 11 cn Place South, have been identified as locations for future bicycle facilities. The alternatives, along with the proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities highlighted in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, will increase safety and encourage walking and bicycling as a mode of transportation in and around the City Center. Mitigation This section summarizes the proposed mitigation anticipated to be required beyond the roadway improvements assumed to be constructed by 2025. These projects are listed on the City's Transportation Improvement Plan and Capital Improvement Program. Existing Roadway Network Both the No Action and Action Alternatives would increase the density and activity within the Federal Way City Center area. The increased density could increase traffic congestion; however, these increases may be offset by reduced vehicle travel demand resulting from mixed -use development, improvements to pedestrian facilities, and improved transit services. The Action Alternative results in a decrease in average vehicle delay at all study area intersections during the PM peak hour, except for three intersections that experience an increase of approximately three seconds of average vehicle delay. For all intersections, the LOS grade does not degrade between the No Action and Action Alternatives. Because the level of service grade does not change, the transportation impacts of the Action Alternatives are less than significant and no mitigation is proposed under the Transportation Impact Analysis. While there are no impacts, and thus no mitigation required for the Action Alternatives, Federal Way, Sound Transit, and WSDOT are making and planning significant investments in the area's transportation network to increase the capacity of the transportation system. These projects include the following: • Interstate 5 — SR 1611SR18 Triangle Project: The reconstruction upgraded ramps and improved connections to and from I-5, SR 18, and SR 161. The benefits of this project are increased travel capacity and safety improvements. • Pacific Highway (SR 99) Phase V High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane improvements, which widened the existing five -lane roadway to a seven -lane section, including center median, curb, sidewalk, and streetlight. The project is planned for construction in 2016. • Federal Way Link Extension project with plans to extend light rail from Downtown Seattle to the Federal Way Transit Center. • The City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, which proposes projects to add capacity for walking and bicycling and enhance accessibility in the area. These types of projects also reduce vehicle trip making by making it easier for people to park once and walk to multiple destinations. • The City's ITS Plan, which when implemented, will provide better traffic signal coordination and operations, improved corridor management during incidents, and increased vehicle capacity. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-21 Parking Additional parking spaces will be required on site for both the No Action and Action Alternatives. These spaces may be provided on the site or as part of parking garages assumed as part of the City Center development. The number of parking spaces required could be reduced through shared parking arrangements or transportation demand management programs. This reduction could vary from 10 to 20 percent based on the effectiveness and robustness of the programs implemented. Additional Mitigation The mitigation identified in this section is focused on additional improvements that could be required to meet the expected travel demand on area roadways associated with the proposed development in the project area. Development will need to meet the requirements of applicable codes at the time of application. Such requirements might include the dedication of right-of-way; installing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; drainage improvements; and other requirements of the City. Additional mitigation may be required for individual development applications within the project area to reduce area traffic impacts, or improve on -site circulation and to meet City and state requirements for Commute Trip Reduction and Transportation Demand Management. Actions to be considered include: On -Site Improvements — Driveway and circulation action/improvements to minimize impact on area roadways. Actions may include management of access points, traffic control measures, construction of internal roadways, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, and connections to adjacent developments. Non -Motorized Mode Improvements — Mitigation may be required per site specific and land use development proposals to address pedestrian, bicycle, and transit improvements to support the plans, policies, and goals as noted within the City's comprehensive plan transportation chapter. Grid Roadway Development — Part of the City Center Plan is to develop a number of internal roadways to create smaller blocks that will improve the grid network and improve the access for pedestrians and vehicles. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements shall be a component of the development submittal phase of a proposed project within the project area. Roadways within the project area must meet specific "City Center" design standards as specified in the City's comprehensive plan transportation chapter. Right -of -Way Dedication — Right-of-way dedication and frontage improvements may be required in conjunction with proposed developments. Roadways within the project area must meet specific "City Center" design standards as specified in the City's comprehensive plan transportation chapter. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) — TDM actions can be used to reduce the impact of the project and as a mitigation action. These actions may include provision of transit passes to tenants and employees, ridesharing programs, priority carpool parking, and guaranteed ride home programs. TDM actions are designed to primarily address commute trips and may not be applicable as mitigation for all developments. The Federal Way Comprehensive Plan summarizes TDM alternatives by their functional grouping and potential effectiveness, implementation difficulties, and expected cost effectiveness. These strategies include: Telecommuting; Parking Management and Pricing; Flexible Work Schedule; Rideshare programs; Traveler Information; Public Relations; and Marketing. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-22 Following is a list of recommended mitigation measures that can be considered in conjunction with individual development projects within the project area: 1. Encourage voluntary expansion of the CTR Program to employers of less than 100 employees. The encouragement by employers may be as diverse as subsidized bus passes, car pool space priority, bike racks, shower facilities, van pools, car pool information access, telecommuting, variable work hours, etc. Encourage the formation and expansion of area -wide ride -sharing programs. Such programs operate with little direct cost to the City and are highly cost effective. 3. Support the enhancement of Park & Ride facilities and transit centers to supplement the regional system, either directly through physical development or enhancements, or indirectly through development conditions where employer vans are required to shuttle employees to Park & Ride facilities or transit centers. 4. Facilitate enhancements to the HOV system. This may include the dedication of property for HOV lanes, construction of arterial HOV lanes within existing City right-of-way, and priority treatments for buses at traffic signals. At the very least, where feasible, opportunities to enhance access to the state system of HOV lanes should be considered. 5. Achieve increased densities and mix of uses to support public transportation, decrease trip generation and parking impacts. 6. Encourage facilities (shelters, loading spaces, etc.) to accommodate City Center shuttle service in association with development projects, together with enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access and security. Improve pedestrian and bicycle access to bus routes and transit centers. This can be a requirement of subdivision, development, and redevelopment. The City may need to acquire easements and construct trail connections. Development incentives could be granted for providing such amenities that are pedestrian, bike, and transit friendly. While bicycle, pedestrian, and bus transit services and facilities may be desirable for other reasons; they should not be looked on as highly cost-effective strategies to the exclusion of those actions listed above. Neighborhood Traffic Control — Development within the project area may be required to include actions to reduce the impact of cut through traffic on residential areas. Examples of neighborhood traffic control actions include: turn restrictions, speed controls, traffic enforcement, and parking restrictions. Parking — Mitigation actions that reduce the parking requirements within the project area should be encouraged. Examples include shared parking, employee parking programs, parking time restrictions, and paid parking programs. Shared parking strategies focus on looking at opportunities where adjacent uses have parking demand profiles that can support the sharing of a smaller amount of parking spaces. For example, an office building with an 8 am to 5 pm demand could share its parking with evening dominated uses, such as restaurants or a cinema. A parking demand study, which shows the hourly parking demand profiles for adjacent uses and the potential for joint parking opportunities within a mixed - use development, can be used to reduce the number of parking spaces. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-23 In addition, contained in the above TDM mitigation are strategies that overlap with parking mitigation plans for development. A development may propose a plan and management system to the City for approval upon submittal of the development permit. Those items may contain the following in support of the City of Federal Way and state Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) requirements: Alternative Mode Support Measures Public education and promotion may increase the effectiveness of these other strategies up to three percent. Area -Wide Ride Matching Services — May result in a 0.1-3.6% reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and an up to 2.5% VMT reduction in transit services. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Vanpool Service — May result in an up to 8.3% in commute VMT, as well as a reduction in transit and vanpool fares up to 2.5%. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Non -Motorized Modes Plan and Implementation — May result in an up to 0-2% regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. HOV Facilities — May result in an up to 1.5% VMT reduction and 0.2% vehicle trip reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. On Site Development of Park and Ride Program — May result in up to 0-0.5% VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Employer -Based TDM Measures Parking Mitigation — Monetary incentives may result in an up to 8-18% trip reduction at site. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip - generation rates. Alternative Work Schedules — May result in as much as a 1 % regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip generation rates. Commute Support Programs — May result in up to 0.1-2.0% regional VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip generation rates. Parking Management — May result in up to a 20 to 30% reduction in SOV trips to/from the site. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip - generation rates. Telecommuting — Up to 10% commute VMT reduction. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-24 Other Strategies Parking Tax — May result in up to a 1 to 5% reduction in regional VMT and trip generation, but requires City Council and/or legislative action. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Development Parking Impact Mitigation — Requires City Council approval to allow for payment of parking -mitigation funds towards long term investments in structured parking solutions in lieu of full parking requirement. Reductions in parking required may be calculated on the basis of these lower trip -generation rates. Mixed Land Use/Jobs Housing Balance — May result in VMT reductions up to 10%. Parking stall credit is given based on overlapping shared usage of mixed facility, per City code provisions. Transit -Oriented and Pedestrian -Friendly Design — Site and building design that encourages transit usage and/or walking may reduce overall parking requirement. Requires design review and staff approval. Employment Center Density — Achievement of sufficient density within the City Center to constitute a regional employment center may reduce SOV work trips to individual development projects by up to 50%. Parking stall reductions may also apply to developments. Other Parking Management Plans — May mitigate 1 to 5% region -wide VMT, provided enforcement issues are addressed in the mitigation plan. Transportation Impact Fee Under 2006 EIS Addendum #3 (November 2010), the transportation impact fee (TIF) program (adopted by Council under Ordinance 09-627 and codified into code under FWRC 19.91), was to replace the established pro-rata mitigation fee per PM vehicle trip identified in Exhibit B to Ordinance 07-547, the Planned Action adoption ordinance. Development within the Planned Action area will be required to pay the required transportation impact fee as prescribed in FWRC 19.91 and the adopted City fee schedule. This practice complies with the state's Growth Management Act (GMA) intent that new growth would pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve the new growth, and also mitigate the adverse impact of future development within the Planned Action area. The transportation impact fee is collected and spent for system improvements included within the list of transportation capital facilities in the City's comprehensive plan transportation chapter. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Development of the Planned Action area would generate additional traffic volumes on the area's roadways. Increases in traffic congestion at some intersections, and/or along some corridors, will result in significant, unavoidable, adverse impacts on the area's transportation system. However, the increased capacity associated with improvement projects would adequately mitigate undesired impacts. The proposed mixed -use land use pattern, on -site improvements, and TDM actions, along with high levels of transit service, may further reduce vehicle trips; thereby, further mitigating impacts on the transportation system. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-25 3.5 Public Services This section of the SEIS describes existing conditions, potential impacts, mitigating measures, and impacts that the proposal and alternative may have on public services. The public services analyzed in this chapter include police, fire, emergency medical service (EMS), and parks and recreation. Affected Environment Police In September 2015, the Federal Way Police Department had 152 full-time employees consisting of 123 sworn officers and 29 civilian positions. Police coverage for each 24-hour period is divided into three shifts. The City of Federal Way is divided into four patrol sectors. Sector 4 serves the Planned Action project area. Minimum staffing levels are seven officers and one supervisor per shift from 0000 hours (midnight) to 1400 hours, and nine officers and one supervisor from 1400 hours to 0000 hours (Commander Arbuthnot, 2015). Three officers are assigned to The Commons at Federal Way full-time. Call data for the first six months of 2015 showed a total of 35,658 calls for service Citywide, with 2,108 calls originating from the City Center, approximately 6 percent of total calls. The goal for the Federal Way Police Department is to respond to Emergency and Priority 1 calls in 3-5 minutes, Priority 2 calls in 7-10 minutes, Priority 3 calls in 15-17 minutes, and Priority 4 calls in 28-30 minutes.' Data shows that throughout Federal Way in 2014 response time goals were being achieved or exceeded for emergency calls: Emergency calls, 3.62 minutes; Priority 1 calls, 6.18 minutes; Priority 2 calls, 14.88 minutes; Priority 3 calls, 23.02 minutes; and Priority 4 calls, 39.64 minutes. Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR)/National Incident Base Reporting System (NIBRS) crimes are reported to both the FBI and State of Washington. These crimes include murder/manslaughter, rape, robbery, felony assaults, burglaries, auto theft, felony theft, and arson. In 2014, larceny was the most prevalent crime citywide and within the City Center, followed by auto theft, burglary, and robbery. Calls for Service (CFS) data is compiled according to reporting districts (RDs). The RDs do not correspond exactly to boundaries in the project area. However, the project area is primarily served by RD 48, RD 74, and RD 76. 1 Priority E— Emergency: Highest priority -confirmed hazard that could result in extensive loss of life and/or property. It represents the greatest danger for officers responding to an immediate danger (e.g. bank robbery in progress, shooting, carjacking with weapon). Priority 1: Represents a potential hazard that could result in the loss of life and/or property. Officers responding may be at risk or seriously jeopardized (e.g. bank holdup alarm, assault with weapon, bomb or explosive devise found, robbery or assault in progress). Priority 2: Represents minimal hazard with considerably less potential for loss of life and/or property. Minimal risk to responding officers (e.g. injury accident, auto theft or burglary in progress). Priority 3: Represents low hazard, non -life threatening situation with minimal risk of property loss (e.g. non -injury vehicle accident, verbal dispute, drug activity, signal malfunction, suspicious person or vehicle). Priority 4: Represents cold calls (e.g. abandoned vehicle, animal complaint, firework complaints, illegal dumping, lost/found property, traffic complaints). City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-26 The top 5 categories of calls for Reporting District (RD) 48 in for the first six months of 2015 include: shoplifting, traffic stop, theft report, extra patrol, and suspicious subject. The top 5 categories of calls for RD 74 in the first six months of 2015 include: traffic stop, shoplift in progress, unwanted subject, welfare check, and commercial alarm. The top 5 categories of calls for RD 76 in the first six months of 2015 include: shoplift in progress, extra patrol, follow-up request, subject stop, and welfare check. Table 3-20 (next page) shows the breakdown of the major crime reported for the project area: RD48, RD74, and RD76. Table 3-20. Crime Statistics in City Center Project Area 2010 2011 2012* 2013* 2014* Crime Type City Center City City Center Ci City Center City City Center City City Center City Homicide 0 5 1 3 0 3 0 6 0 4 Rae 0 50 3 35 0 43 0 38 2 62 Robbery 8 152 5 ill 3 107 6 108 13 135 Felony Assault 3 118 4 96 3 152 2 134 4 148 Burla 13 828 9 700 11 932 11 884 13 838 Auto Theft 48 741 50 669 37 811 45 786 45 866 Larceny 699 3,141 638 2,884 545 3,420 682 3,593 887 3,912 Arson 0 11 0 11 0 9 0 7 0 13 Total 771 5.046 710 4,509 599 5,477 746 5,556 964 5,978 % in City Center 15.30% 15.75% 10.94% 13.42% 16.13% *NIBRS: National Incident Base Reporting System Source: Federal Way Police Department, 2015 Table 3-21 compares the citywide data for the three main reporting districts in the project area. As shown, 10.8 percent of collisions, 2.5 percent of traffic stops, and 1.1 percent of DUI arrests occurred within the City Center project area. Table 3-21. Traffic Enforcement Activity 1/1/15-6/30/15 Type of Activity Citywide # of calls RD76 RD74 RD48 # of calls % # of calls % # of calls % Collisions 1,089 14 1.3 9 0.8 95 8.7 Traffic Stops 7.540 19 0.3 40 0.5 128 1.7 DUI Arrests 91 1 0 0 0 0 1 1.1 Source: Federal Way Police Department, 2015. Fire and EMS The Planned Action area is served by South King Fire & Rescue, which is governed by an elected board of five Fire Commissioners. SKF&R's services include: City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-27 + Emergency response for fire, emergency medical, rescue, marine, and hazardous materials incidents. + Fire prevention services include public education, engineering, code enforcement, and fire investigation. • Support divisions include administration; finance; fleet and facilities maintenance and repair; information technology; and firefighter training. Parks and Recreation When the City of Federal Way incorporated in 1990, there were approximately eight acres of parkland available per 1,000 population. Since that time, the City has purchased additional property and developed new facilities. As of 2012, the City was providing 12.52 acres of parkland per 1,000 population, compared to an adopted level of service of 10.9 acres of parkland per 1,000 population. The City currently provides 1,141.13 acres of parkland, with 601.7 acres developed for recreational use areas and 539.43 acres undeveloped. Parks near the Planned Action area include Steel Lake and Celebration Park. Steel Lake Park is located just to the northeast. Celebration Park is located just southwest, at 1 Ith Place South and South 324th Street. These parks are within walking distance of the City Center and they serve as regional facilities in addition to serving local needs. Town Square Park is located within the Planned Action area. Opened in July 2014, Town Square Park is Federal Ways first downtown park. Town Square is Federal Way's gathering space for special events, movies in the park, concerts, and a wide range of recreational activities. Phase I of the park featured a large open lawn area for play activities; full and half-size basketball courts; large -size and regular chess board play; and barbecues and picnic tables. Phase II improvements include installation of a larger lawn, a children's play area, spray park, restrooms, basketball courts, and a walking path. Construction began in summer 2015, with the park re -opening scheduled for summer 2016. The Performing Arts and Event Center will be constructed to the north of Town Square Park. Impacts Impacts Common to All Alternatives Police During construction phases of future development, construction activity in the City Center project area may affect the response times of emergency vehicles. Currently, the Federal Way Police Department staffs 1.4 officers per 1,000 population. Future development will result in an incremental increase in calls for emergency service. Under Alternative 2 (No Action) approximately 4,512 additional residents and 2,392 additional employees can be expected in the area by 2025. Based on the residential population alone, this will result in an increased need of approximately 6.4 officers by 2025 to maintain the current LOS. If employment population is also considered, Alternative 2 would result in a need for a total of approximately 9.7 officers by 2025. Under Alternative 1 development projections, an additional 6,480 residents and 2,804 additional employees can be expected in the project area by 2025. Based on the additional residential population alone, this will result in an increased need of approximately 9 officers by 2025 to maintain the current LOS. If employment population is also considered, a total of approximately 13 officers would be required. Therefore, Alternative 1 results in the greatest need for additional officers between 2015-2025. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-28 Alternative 1 will generate the greatest demand for police services and will also generate the greatest amount of development and supportive tax base to provide revenues to support increased police staffing. Assuming that some of these additional revenues are provided for police protection, the Federal Way Police Department concludes that it will have adequate existing and planned capacity to meet the increased demand under either of the alternatives (Andy J. Hwang, Federal Way Police Department, 2015). With coordination and planning, no significant impacts are expected to result from the proposal or alternative. Fire and EMS During construction phases of future development, construction activity in the Planned Action area may affect the response times of emergency vehicles. Over the long term, future development will result in an incremental increase in calls for emergency service and future traffic growth may impact the response time of emergency vehicles. The magnitude of the increment would depend on the type and rate of the development and related transportation system improvements. South King Fire & Rescue is positioned to provide service for this growth, and it is expected that future development will provide the funding necessary for SKF&R to meet the increased service demands. SKF&R does not anticipate any significant impacts to result from the proposal -or alternatives. Parks and Recreation Development of the action alternative will result in an additional 6,480 new residents in the City Center project area. The additional residents will result in an increased demand for 70.6 acres of new parkland according to the City's 2012 level of service goal of 10.9 acres per 1,000 population. Under Alternative 2, the 4,512 new residents would result in an increased demand for approximately 49.2 acres of parkland. Mitigation Measures Impacts to public services from development under the Planned Action designation would not be significant. However, measures can be taken to prevent or further minimize environmental consequences to public services and utilities. Recommended mitigating measures include: • Coordinate with the Police Department and South King Fire & Rescue during final design, construction, and operation of future development to ensure reliable emergency access is maintained. • Coordinate with the Parks, Recreation, & Cultural Services Department to identify opportunities for increased recreational open space for general public use throughout the project area, and within new development proposals. • Reduce public safety impacts thru adherence to crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) design standards. • Provide emergency service providers with advanced notice of construction schedules and any planned street closures or blockages. • Avoid or minimize street closures or blockages during construction to avoid potential impact to emergency response times. Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No significant unavoidable adverse impacts to public services are anticipated. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-29 3.6 Utilities This section of the SEIS describes existing conditions, potential impacts, mitigating measures, and impacts that the proposal and alternative may have on utilities: water and sewer, energy (electricity, natural gas), and telecommunications. Affected Environment Water Lakehaven Utility District provides domestic water for most of the City, including the Planned Action area. The primary sources of domestic water include treated surface water from the Second Supply Project (SSP) and four aquifer systems that underlie the City. The water system includes 450 miles of mainline, 3 SSP flow control facilities, 25 production wells, 3 booster pump stations, 9 interties with adjacent water purveyors, and 12 water storage tanks with a storage capacity of 31.35 million gallons. The average daily demand is approximately 10 million gallons per day (MGD). The Lakehaven 2014-2020 Water System Plan Update (WSPU) sets forth projected facility needs and standards. It is based on growth projections developed by the local governments served by the District. In the case of Federal Way, the WSPU is based on growth projections contained in the City's comprehensive plan. The WSPU meets or exceeds South King Fire & Rescue's fire flow requirements for new development. Water service is extended to new development through one of four methods: connection to existing mains; utility local improvement districts (ULID); developer extension agreement; or temporary water service agreement. Table 3-22 shows estimated usage demands per land use activity type. Long-term water and sewer use averages for equivalent residential unit demands are trending downward from 255 gpd and 220 gpd respectively. Lakehaven Development Engineering uses 255 gpd (water) and 220 gpd (sewer) for connection charge calculations. Table 3-22. Water and Sewer Service Demand Estimates Type of Use Estimated Usage Units Residential Equivalent Equivalent Peak Water Demand(per day) Equivalent Sewer Dischar a(per dayd Residential 1 residential equivalent (2.45 persons) 255 gallons per day (gpd) 220 Restaurant 3 per 1,000 sf 765 gpder 1,000 sf 660 per 1,000 sf Retail 0.2 per 1,000 sf 51 gpder 1,000 sf 44 per 1,000 sf Office 0.3 per 1,000 sf 77 gpd per 1,000 sf 66 per 1,000 sf Source: Lakehaven Utility District, 2015 The City Center is divided by two water pressure zones. Pressure Zone 578, located primarily north of South 320th Street, provides pressures at the ground level of between 33 and 74 psi. Pressure Zone 538, located mostly south of South 320`h Street, ranges between 42 and 53 psi. Depending on building height, building booster pumps should be considered. Water flow to the City Center is supported by large 12 inch and 16 inch mains, and each pressure zone has a storage tank within the City Center area. The water distribution system is ample for a typical urban commercial center. The pressure boundary allows large water consumption in one area (i.e., north of 320`h) not to affect water pressure to other areas (i.e., south of 320`h). City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-30 A portion of the District's water supply and storage program includes development of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR). This program includes the use of the District's largest groundwater source (Redondo Milton Channel Aquifer — "RMC") and treated SSP water for artificial recharge of the Mirror Lake Aquifer (MLA) during the winter months. This seasonal recharge would allow increased groundwater pumping during the peak summer months. Approximately 9.4 billion gallons of water could be recovered from the MLA when the aquifer is full. In addition, the District's proposed water reclamation program includes enhancing groundwater recharge by infiltrating reclaimed water to maintain groundwater levels in the RMC and mitigate potential impacts of ASR. Lakehaven has identified goals and objectives to: maintain their water systems and water quality to the highest level of service and at the least level required by applicable regulations; participate in conservation efforts to maximize existing water supply resources and develop new water resources; and install new water distribution systems as necessary to serve the existing and future population within the District. Sewer The Lakehaven Utility District also provides sewer service to the City of Federal Way, including the City Center project area. The sanitary sewer system is comprised of three major components: the trunk and collection system; the pump station system; and the wastewater treatment plants. The trunk and collection system collects wastewater from drainage basins and conveys it to the treatment plant primarily by gravity flow. In areas where use of gravity flow is not possible, pump stations and force mains, and low-pressure sewer mains are used to pump the sewage to a location where gravity flow can be used. The 2009 District's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan is currently being updated. The sewer system includes approximately 350 miles of mainline, 28 pump stations, and two secondary wastewater treatment plants. The system is divided into 2 primary basins (Lakota and Redondo) and 57 sub -basins. The wastewater generated within the City Center area is within the largest basin known as Lakota. Wastewater from the City Center area flows directly to the Lakota Plant, designed for a peak month flow of 10 million gallons per day (MGD). Currently flows are averaging 5.37 MGD and no expansions are expected until 2021 (Lakehaven, 2015). Demand for sanitary sewer service is based on future population and employment forecasts. Population forecasts are presented by drainage basin and are based on the adopted land use plans of the various jurisdictions within which the District operates. In the case of Federal Way, forecasts are based on the City's comprehensive plan. In the Federal Way area, approximately 220 gallons per day is equal to one equivalent residential unit (ERU) of sewer flow discharged into the system. The District develops a capital improvement projects (CIP) summary as a part of the annual District budget process. The CIP lists individual capital projects for the succeeding 10-year time frame and prioritizes projects according to the system needs. The District has started upgrading its existing 12 inch sewer trunk line within the City Center to 30 inch to handle future increased flows within the City Center area. Electricity Federal Way is served mostly by Puget Sound Energy (PSE), a private electric utility. Electricity is produced elsewhere and transported to switching stations in Kent and Renton through high - voltage transmission lines. PSE provides electrical service to approximately 39,700 electric City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-31 customers in Federal Way. Also within the City are several 115 kV transmission lines and a number of neighborhood distribution substations. PSE's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) is updated and filed with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission every two years. The current plan, which was submitted in May of 2013, details the energy resources needed to reliably meet customers' wintertime, peak -hour electric demand over the next 20 years. The plan, which will be updated in the fall of 2015, forecasted that PSE would have to acquire approximately 4,900 megawatts of new power -supply capacity by 2033. This resource need is driven mainly by expiring purchased -power contracts and expected population and economic growth in the Puget Sound region. The IRP suggests that roughly half of the utility's long-term electric resource need can be met by energy efficiency and the renewal of transmission contracts. The IPR stated that the rest of PSE's gap in long-term power resources is likely to be met most economically with added natural gas -fired resources. The capacity of individual electric lines depends on voltage, diameter of the wire, and the clearance to objects below the line. To meet this demand, some new transmission lines and substations will need to be constructed, as well as existing ones rebuilt and/or maintained. Utility work is sometimes needed to comply with federal system reliability regulations. Specific construction that is anticipated includes the following: Expand Marine View substation to accommodate a new 115kV line that will improve reliability through an automatic switching scheme. As electric loads increase, a new 115kV transmission line will be necessary from the Christopher substation to the 115kV line that serves the Weyerhaeuser substation. This line would continue to the intersection of Enchanted Parkway South and Military Road South. Increases in the electric demand on the Weyerhaeuser campus and surrounding area may require additional substations in any combination of the Five Mile Lake, Enchanted Parkway, or Weyerhaeuser substation areas. Natural Gas It is estimated that Puget Sound Energy (PSE) currently serves over 18,880 natural gas customers within the City of Federal Way. PSE Gas System Integrity -Maintenance Planning has several DuPont manufactured main and service piping and STW main replacements planned for 2015. There are not any major projects planned in 2015 at this time, but new projects can be developed in the future at any time due to: 1. New or replacement of existing facilities to increase capacity requirements due to new building construction and conversion from alternate fuels. 2. Main replacement to facilitate improved maintenance of facilities. 3. Replacement or relocation of facilities due to municipal and state projects. Telecommunications Telecommunications in Federal Way include both land based and wireless telephone services, internet service, and cable and satellite TV. CenturyLink and Comcast provide land -based telephone, cable TV service, and internet service. There are also several wireless telephone providers and voice over internet providers (VoIP). Direct TV and Dish Network provide satellite television services. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-32 Telephone System CenturyLink and Comcast deliver land based telephone service throughout the City. Comcast also provides digital phone service (VoIP), while CenturyLink provides digital phone service only to its business customers. Their facilities are constructed overhead and in some cases underground. Every telecommunications company operating in this state is required by law to provide adequate telecommunications services on demand in compliance with RCW 80.36.090 and Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC) regulations. Accordingly, CenturyLink will provide facilities, upon reasonable notice, to accommodate whatever growth pattern occurs within the City. Due to advances in technology, additional capacity is easily and quickly added to the system. Wireless Networks Federal Way is currently served with a number of wireless service providers including AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon. Wireless technologies use a line -of -sight radio signal transmitted and received by antennas. Therefore, it is not possible to underground the antennas or structures on which the antennas are mounted. Antennas and ancillary equipment are located on freestanding poles and towers and on existing structures and buildings. City code regulates their siting. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates the cellular telephone industry to ensure that their operation does not interfere with AM/FM radio and cable television transmissions. Capacity is a function of frequency of use, the number of sites in a geographic area, and the number of customers. Cellular facilities are located throughout the City. Like the non -cellular telephone companies, wireless companies expand services in response to growth. For this reason, companies closely analyze market demand to determine expansions into new service areas. Cellular technology is constantly advancing so capacity is frequently expanded through technological advances at existing sites. Internet Service Various companies provide internet service by telephone, cable, wireless, and satellite. As the City constructs or reconstructs streets, it is providing conduits to assist in the installation of fiber optic communication systems. Cable Television Cable television service in the City is provided by Comcast, CenturyLink, Direct TV, and Dish Network. Comcast and CenturyLink utilize cable and fiber optic technologies and Direct TV and Dish Network utilize satellite technologies. Cable television installations are made to new subscribers (either to new dwelling units, or to a much smaller degree, to residences who have not opted for cable before) at published rates; provided they are less than 125 feet from a distribution or feeder line. Connections requiring longer runs are charged on a time and material basis. Most public work considerations, such as tree trimming, work in the right-of-way, restoration of property, and so on, are covered in the City of Federal Way Master Cable Television Ordinance and Franchise Agreements with cable television providers. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-33 Impacts Impacts Common to All Alternatives Water and Sanitary Sewer Service According to Lakehaven, there is adequate water flow available for either alternative, and with the downtown sewer trunk upgrade, there is adequate wastewater collection and treatment capacity at the Lakota Plant for these alternatives. Ongoing maintenance of conveyance and distribution lines will be necessary. No conflicts with proposed plans, policies, or regulations are expected. Other than completion of the downtown sewer trunk upgrade, no additional capacity would be required. Energy Electricity — During construction phases of the proposal and alternatives, construction activity could result in disruption of service, the need to relocate service lines, and other construction. related impacts. These impacts will occur over a short time period and are not anticipated to result in significant impacts to the area. Over the long term, development will increase demand for energy. Future residential demand is likely to increase significantly as residential development increases from the current 254 units to the planned 2,400 units. Natural Gas — Under the action alternative, future residential development could increase to 2,400 new units. Commercial use varies widely, but could be expected to increase significantly if all new development under the proposal were to occur. As noted previously, PSE has planned for growth and reports adequate capacity to serve increased demand. Significant impacts are not anticipated. Telecommunication Over the long term, the increased residential and employment population will increase the use of and demand for telecommunication products. Service providers have adequate capacity and do not anticipate significant impacts in the provision of service. Mitigation Measures Water and Sanitary Sewer Service • Ensure that all new development complies with local, state, and federal standards for energy conservation. • Encourage drought -tolerant landscaping (xeriscaping) for new development. • Encourage new development to incorporate appropriate water conservation measures into their operations. Utilities • Plan with service providers to minimize impacts of utility relocations (equipment procurement times, relocate in advance of construction, etc.). • Inform utility customers of any planned temporary service disruptions. • Coordinate with all utility companies on the design of the new services and connections. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-34 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No significant unavoidable adverse impacts are anticipated. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 3-35 Chapter 4 Comments and Responses This chapter contains written comments provided on the Draft SEIS during the SEIS comment period, which ranged from October 16 to November 16, 2015. The written comments received during this period are presented verbatim. All comments were received by email. No comments were received at the public meeting held on November 9, 2015. Responses to comments follow the comments section. 4.1 Public Comments Comments received include the following: Number Date Author 1 October 22, 2015 Roberta Anderson, Siena Engineering Group on behalf of AT&T 2 November 3, 2015 Tina Vaslet, Pierce Transit 3 November 16, 2015 Leah Bolotin, AICP, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) 4 November 20, 2015 Leah Bolotin, AICP, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) COMMENT #1: From: Roberta Anderson <Roberta.Anderson@sienaengineeringgroup.com> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:38 AM To: Stacey Welsh Subject: 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Impact AT&T is not involved - Thank you Roberta Roberta Anderson Siena Engineering Group 11241 Willows Rd N.E., Suite 130 Redmond, WA 98052 Phone: 425-896-9839 Email: Roberta.Anderson@SienaEnizinecrinpGroup.com 5ienaEnizineeringGroup.com City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action EIS 4-1 COMMENT #2: From: Tina Vaslet [mailto:tvaslet@piercetransit.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:04 PM To: Tina Piety Subject: RE: Federal Way 2016 City Center Planned Action Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Good Afternoon Tina, Pierce Transit is excited about the future plans for the City Center and look forward to hearing more about it as the project gets nearer. Pierce Transit has no comment at this time. Thank You, Tina Vaslet Planner II — Bus Stops Pierce Transit 253-983-2706 COMMENT #3: From: Bolotin, Leah <BolotiL@wsdot.wa.gov> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 4:13 PM To: Stacey Welsh Cc: Prestrud, Charles; Pazooki, Ramin; Brown, Rob Subject: draft WSDOT comments on DSEIS for Federal Way City Center Stacy, I had a chance to review the DSEIS-PA for the Federal Way City Center development envelope of increased land use denisty. I would like to congratulate Federal Way on planning for moving ahead with plans to create a vibrant, mixed use, walkable City Center. Sounds like it will be something to travel to Federal Way for! As discussed, WSDOT has a few questions/concerns regarding the adoption of a V/C of 1.1 as the transportation LOS standard, as well as the forecasted increase in collisions. Please consider this email a draft until Federal Way has a chance to review and request any desired edits. After your review, we will forward a formal letter of comment; this draft is to ensure that our comments are received by the deadline which is today, Nov 16th. Level of Service Federal Way has adopted a V/C of 1.1 as an overall LOS standard for intersections. The DSEIS states "None of the intersections are anticipated to be deficient in the Action Alternative based on Federal Way's traffic operations standards," meaning above a V/C of 1.1. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action EIS 4-2 Level of service standards have traditionally been developed as an average intersection delay of between A and F. Many jurisidictions are beginning to utilize a V/C ratio rather than traditional A-F measure of delay. Although a specific crosswalk between A-F LOS and V/C ratios has not been widely accepted, a V/C ratio greater than 1.0 is generally considered equivalent to a traditional intersection delay LOS of F. Local jurisdictions set the LOS standard for their local transportation network. However, WSDOT sets LOS standards for Highways of Statewide Significance <http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/6AF72388-2455-47B9-B72D- 2BE9A89AOE19/0/LOSStandardsforWAHwys.pdf>, (also available in Appendix G of the Highway System Plan<http://wsdot.wa.gov/planning/HSP>) and PSRC sets LOS standards for non-HSS highways, or Highways of Regional Significance <http://www.psrc.org/transportafon/t2040/los/>. Ramp intersections with local arterials are included in the WSDOT/PSRC purview for setting LOS standards. The adoption of a V/C standard of 1.1 therefore does not apply to intersections on state facilities. State highways in and adjacent to the City Center are: Highway ID Highway Category Adopted LOS I-5 HSS D SR 18 HSS D SR 99 HSS D SR 161 HRS E/mitigated SR 509 HRS E/mitigated The TIA and SDEIS show forecast PM peak hour LOS operations below the WSDOT LOS standard at six intersections on SR 99, and below the PSRC LOS standard at one intersection on SR 161, for both the No Action and Action Alternatives: Federal Way City Center Planned Action Development Envelope for Higher Density Land Use PM Peak Hour LOS Intersection SR 99 S 288th Street S 320th Street S 324th Street S 336th Street S 348th Street S 356th Street SR 161 Existing 2025 No Action 2025 Action Adopted Standard D F E E D E D E E F D E S 348th Street E F F D E D* E D E D F D* E D F E/Mitigated *When a development affects a segment or intersection where the existing LOS is already below the adopted standard, the pre -development LOS is to be used instead of the otherwise applicable deficiency level. This would apply to the SR 99 intersections with S 320th and S 348th Streets, i.e., their LOS should not be degraded any lower than it already is, which is LOS E. WSDOT understands and supports the concept of compact, walkable centers, and that the proposed mixed -use land use pattern, on -site improvements, and TDM actions and high levels of City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action EIS 4-3 transit service are expected to reduce vehicle trips. It is also stated in the SDEIS that the increased capacity associated with improvement projects will help to mitigate impacts. We assume, however, that both the anticipated higher mode splits and funded improvement projects are included in the future baseline modeling for the TIA that resulted in the above forecasts. If not, then please provide the analysis showing how the non -motorized and transit amentities, and/or funded capital improvements are expected to mitigate the expected increase in peak hour trips. Since the SDEIS is being proposed as a planned action, this will be WSDOT's only opportunity to request mitigation on state facilities for the additional 2150-2275 pm peak hour trips forecast for the Action and No Action alternatives. The development envelope of the City Center subarea being proposed for high density land use is directly adjacent to five state facilities. The increase is being proposed as a SEPA action. Under SEPA, when proposed development would degrade state facilities below the adopted LOS threshold, the facilities are considered deficient to support the development, and WSDOT and its partners may seek reasonable and proportionate mitigation of traffic impacts. We therefore disagree with the statement that "based on the level of service (LOS) analysis, no additional roadway capacity improvements are needed." Please provide the analysis showing how proposed improvements will mitigate the transportation impacts on state facilities to an approximation of their adopted LOS standards. Otherwise, the impacts to state facilities from the increased land use density will require more mitigation than what is proposed to bring those intersections into compliance with the adopted LOS standard. For specific mitigation approaches, please contact Ramin Pazooki, NW Region Development Office Manager, at 206- 440-4710 or ramin.pazooki@wsdot.wa.gov. Collisions The SDEIS states that there is a probability of traffic collisions increasing with additional traffic. It is additionally stated that "Both the Action and No Action Alternatives would increase the total vehicle volume of vehicles at the high collision locations identified in Table 3-12." (p 3-19) Target Zero<http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/planning/SHSP.htm>, the state's Strategic Highway Safety Plan, is the adopted plan to help guide investments to achieve zero fatal and serious injury collisions on all public roads by 2030. We are therefore also wondering if Federal Way has adopted the Target Zero goals, and what the City proposes to do about the anticipated increase in collision rates. For assistance with specific safety improvements, please contact Rob Brown, WSDOT Traffic Engineer for Federal Way, at 206-440-4413 or rob.brownCc msdot.wa.gov. Thank you for the opportunity to review the DSEIS for your City Center. Please let me know if Federal Way wishes to edit this draft comment letter prior to its finalization. We can discuss changes, or Federal Way can submit comments or edits via email. We would also be glad to come down to discuss face-to-face. Sincerely, Leah City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action EIS 4-4 Leah Bolotin, AICP Senior Planner WSDOT Sno-King Planning Office Phone: 206-440-5057 Comprehensive Planning Resources htt ://www.wsdot.wa. ov/ lannin communi /GMA.htm COMMENT #4: From: Bolotin, Leah [mailto:BolotiL@wsdot.wa.gov] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 7:01 PM To: Sarady Long Cc: Brown, Rob; Pazooki, Ramin; Palisoc, Felixberto; Prestrud, Charles Subject: mitigation resources Hi Sarady, Thank you for the phone call yesterday regarding LOS standards, safety, and mitigation for the City Center high -density development envelope DSEIS. Here is a link to the Development Services webpage: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Northwest/DevelopmentServices/. A link to the Development Services Manual is provided in the left sidebar under "General Information - Manuals". There is a discussion of different mitigation approaches in Chapter 4. Although this is the reference I was thinking of when we spoke, the discussion in the manual seems largely about funding for mitigation rather than the mitigation itself. Section 4.1.06 discusses LOS mitigation in particular. Note that on page 4-4, the first paragraph clarifies the application of WSDOT LOS standards in situations where the existing LOS is already poorer than the standard. In those situations, the existing LOS becomes the new standard below which the jurisdiction is required to mitigate the traffic impacts. This would apply to the SR 99 intersections with S 320th and S 348th Streets. Note also the following paragraph, which states that the methodology used for LOS evaluation must be from the latest version of the Highway Capacity Manual. I believe this to be incorrect. Per WAC 365-196-430 <http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=365-196- 430>(2)(e)(vi)and (vii), any appropriate methodology may be used: The [LOS] measurement methodology and standards should vary based on the urban or rural character of the surrounding area. The county or city should also balance the desired community character, funding capacity, and traveler expectations when selecting level of service methodologies and standards. A county or city may select different ways to measure travel performance depending on how a county or city balances these factors and the characteristics of travel in their community. For example, counties and cities may measure performance at different times of day, week, or month (peak versus off-peak, weekday versus weekend, summer versus winter). Counties and cities may also measure performance at different geographic scales (intersections, road or route segments, travel corridors, or travel zones), or in terms of the supply of multimodal capacity available in a corridor. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action EIS 4-5 In urban areas RCW 36.70A.108 <http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=36.70A.108> encourages the use of methodologies analyzing the transportation system from a comprehensive, multimodal perspective. Multimodal levels of service methodologies and standards should consider the needs of travelers using the four major travel modes (motor vehicle, public transportation, bicycle, and pedestrian), their impacts on each other as they share the street, and their mode specific requirements for street design and operation. For example, bicycle and pedestrian level of service standards should emphasize the availability of facilities and safety levels for users. As discussed, a crosswalk between methodologies that will allow us to easily determine if an operating LOS meets the standard should also be provided. V/C is fine with me as long as that crosswalk is provided. Rob, Ramin, Felix, if any of you disagree with this please let Sarady know. For actual mitigation approaches, I would suggest utilizing some of the resources available on our Growth Management webpage <http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/planning/community/GMA.htm>, such as How can Cities and Counties Plan for all Transportation Modes? or the Commerce publication Your Community's Transportation System. Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance. Happy Holidays! Leah Leah Bolotin, AICP Senior Planner WSDOT Sno-King Planning Office Phone: 206-440-5057 Comprehensive Planning Resources http://www.wsdot.wa.goy/planningcommunity/GMA.htm 4.2 Responses to Comments No response is required to Comment #1 from Roberta Anderson, Siena Engineering Group, on behalf of AT&T. No response is required to Comment #2 from Tina Vaslet, Pierce Transit. Responses to Comments #3 and #4 from Leah Bolotin, AICP, WSDOT are listed below by issue. Level of Service (LOS) In 2015, as part of the comprehensive plan update, the level of service (LOS) standard was revised and adopted by the Federal Way City Council. The City's comprehensive plan has been accepted by the Department of Commerce and Puget Sound Regional Council. The City Center Planned City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action EIS 4-6 Action SEIS does not change the adopted LOS standard. Please see pages 9 (Existing Traffic Operations), 31 (Traffic Operations Impact), and 46 (Mitigation) of Appendix 2 (TIA), and companion segments of Section 3.4 (Transportation) in the SEIS for further discussion of LOS. Mitigation The Action Alternative results in a decrease in average vehicle delay at all study area intersections during the PM peak hour, except for three intersections that experience an increase of approximately three seconds of average vehicle delay. For all intersections, the LOS grade does not degrade between the No Action and Action Alternatives. Because the LOS grade does not change, the transportation impacts of the Action Alternatives are less significant and no mitigation is proposed under the Transportation Impact Analysis. Please see page 46 (Mitigation) of Appendix 2 (TIA), and the companion segment of Section 3.4 (Transportation) in the SEIS for an updated discussion of mitigation measures. Collisions The City and WSDOT have made investments in the study area in an on -going effort to reduce the number of preventable accidents that occur. It is anticipated that through these investments, the number of serious and preventable accidents will decrease. Please see pages 15 (Collision Analysis) and 40 (Traffic Safety Impact) of Appendix 2 (TIA), and companion segments of Section 3.4 (Transportation) in the SEIS for an updated discussion of collisions. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action EIS 4-7 Chapter 5 References 5.1 Printed References Federal Way, City of. 2006. City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Draft Environmental Impact Statement. —. 2006. City of Federal Way City Center Planned Action Final Environmental Impact Statement. 2015. City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. http://www.ci.federal-way.wa.us/ 2015. City of Federal Way Website. http://www.ci.federal-way.wa.us/index.aspx 2015. Federal Way Revised Code. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/FederalWay/ King County. July 2014. The King County Buildable Lands Report 2014. http://www.kingcounty.gov/property/permits/codes/2014%20KC%20Buildable%20Lands% 20Report.aspx King County. 2015. Parcel Viewer 2.0. http://gismaps.kingcounty.gov/parcelviewer2/ 5.2 Personal Communications Goodsell, Gordon, Assistant Fire Marshal. South King Fire and Rescue. Personal communication with Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way Community Development Department, 2015. Email transmittal September 23, 2015. Hwang, Andy J., Chief of Police. Federal Way Police Department. Personal communication with Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way Community Development Department, 2015. Email transmittal September 9, 2015. Osborne, Tim, Development Engineering Manager. Lakehaven Utility District. Personal communication with Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way Community Development Department, 2015. Email transmittal September 24, 2015. Roy, Michelle, Crime Analyst Program Coordinator. Federal Way Police Department. Personal communication with Stacey Welsh, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way Community Development Department, 2015. Email transmittal September 8, 2015. City Center Planned Action Final Planned Action SEIS 5-1 Appendix 1 Distribution List CITY OF FEDERAL WAY CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION SEIS Distribution List FINAL SEIS DISTRIBUTION LIST NATIONAL, STATE, COUNTY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT * City of Auburn— ksWde;Qci.aubum.wa.us, 25 W Main, Aubum, WA 98001 * City of Algona—planner@cityofalgona_com, 402 Warde St, Algona, WA 98001-8505 * City of Des Moines —dlathropOdesmoineswa.gov, 21630 11`h Ave S, Ste D, Des Moines, WA 98198 * City of Edgewood— cityhall tr eiWfedgtwnod.org, 2224 104`h Meridian Ave E, Edgewood, WA 98372 * City of Federal Way, Chief of Staff- brian.wilsonCiv_citvoffederalway.com, 33325 8`h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 * City of Federal Way, Economic Development— tim.johnson@ciMffederalway.eom, 33325 81h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 * City of Federal Way, Public Works— niarwan.salloumcilyoffederalway.com, 33325 81h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 * City of Fife— sfrfddieAcitvflfffc.org, 5411 23`d St E, Fife, WA 98424 * City of Kent— T lannin kentwa.gov, 400 W Gowe St, Ste 300, Kent, WA 98032 * City of Milton — clarson c cityofmilton.net, 1000 Laurel St, Milton, WA 98354 * City of Pacific — idodge`7ir,ci.pacific.wa.us, 100 Third Ave SE, Pacific, WA 98047 * City of Tacoma —shirie .schul ci.taco a.wa.us, 747 Market St, Tacoma, WA 98402 Econ. Dev. Council of Seattle & King Co.—info(rtgAr_-seaking.ort=, 1301 5`h Ave, Ste 1500, Seattle, WA 98101 * EPA Environmental Review Section — a-seattleCrepaxov, 1200 6d Ave MD-126, Seattle, WA 98101 * Federal Way Library — 34200 1" Way S, Federal Way, WA 98003 * Federal Way 320th Library — 848 S 320`h, Federal Way, WA 98003 * Federal Way Public Schools — tnascimeCcDD s.org, 33330 8`h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 King Co Dept. of Natural Res —kevin.kieman( kingcounty.gov, 201 S Jackson St, Ste 701, Seattle, WA 98104-3855 * King Co Dept. of Permitting & Environ. Review— 35030 SE Douglas St, #210, Snoqualmie, WA 98065-9266 * King Co Dept. of Transportation — harold.tani chi kin coup . ov, 201 S. Jackson St, KSC-TR-0815, Seattle, WA 98104 King Co Parks & Rec — matthew. erkin5 mkim caun ov, 201 S Jackson St, #700, Seattle, WA 98104 King Co Roads Division —maint,roadV kinecountv.gov, 155 Monroe Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 King Co Transit Div. Env. Planning —gagkriedtCakingcountY ogov, 201 S Jackson St, Seattle, WA 98104-3856 King Co Wastewater Treatment Environmental Pln Oap — MS KSC-NR-0505, 201 S Jackson St, Seattle, WA 98104-3855 Metro Transit —customer.comments g.kin-gcountv.uov, 201 S Jackson St, KSC-TR-0324 Seattle, WA 98104-3856 Pierce County Planning & Land Services—aclark r co. pierce. wa.us, 2401 S 35`' St, Tacoma, WA 98409 Pierce County Public Works & Utilities — bz_igglcw"dStl, Ste 628, Tacoma, WA 98409 * Pierce Transit— bhar rt niercetransit.org & tvaslei iercetransit.or , PO Box 99070, Lakewood, WA 98496-0070 * Puget Sound Clean Air Agency— e a scleanair.or , 1904 3rd Ave, Ste 105, Seattle, WA 98101-3317 * Puget Sound Regional Council — eharris(&psrc.ora, 1011 Westem Ave, #500, Seattle, WA 98104 * Sound Transit —perry.weinbgMCaEoundtransit.org, 401 S Jackson St, Seattle, WA 98104 * South King County Fire & Rescue —chris.in gham south king tire.o , 31617 1" Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 * WA Dept. of Archaeology & Historic Preservation —mtchen.kaehler(kdahMwa_goy, PO Box 48343, Olympia, WA 98504-8343 * WA Dept. of Commerce, Growth Mgmt Svcs—revie,_v_tea_rnAommerce.wagov, PO Box 42525, Olympia, WA 98504-2525 * WA Dept. of Ecology (2, email & paper mailed)—separegistcr(r eay.wa.goy, SEPA Unit, PO Box 47703, Olympia, WA 98504- 7703 Appendix 1 Page 1 CITY OF FEDERALWAY CITY CENTER PLANNED ACTION SEIS * WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife -wfwoctai30,,fws.Qov, PO Box 43200, Olympia, WA 98504-3155 * WA Dept. of Natural Resources -PO Box 47015, Olympia, WA 98504-7015 * WA Dept. of Transportation- ramin.pazookiQwsdot.wa.gov &bolotil rr wsdot.wa.eov, PO Box 330310, Seattle, WA 98133- 9710 TRIBES * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Fisheries Division-karen.walter@muckleshoot.nsm.us, 39015 172"d Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 * Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Tribal Archaeologist -laura.muMh +t .muckleshoot.nsn.us, 39015 172"d Ave SE, Auburn, WA 98092 * Puyallup Tribe of Indians Historic Preservation Dept. -bran don.reynonOpuyalIuptribe.eom, 3009 E Portland Ave, Tacoma, WA 98404 * Suquamish Tribe THP Office-dlwearch rr suquamish.nsn.us, 18490 Suquamish Way, Suquamish, WA 98392 UTILITIES AT&T Cable Maintenance OSP Engineering WA/OR/N.ID - robe rta.anderson elysienaen,gineeringgroua.com, 11241 Willows Road NE, Ste 130, Redmond, WA 98052-1009 Bonneville Power Association TER 3 - 28401 Covington Way SE, Kent, WA 98065 Comcast Cable - 4020 Auburn Way N, Auburn, WA 98002-1315 * Lakehaven Utility District -basbury@lakehaven.org, PO Box 4249, Federal Way, WA 98063 Century Link-yictor.novelo(i-vcenturvlink.com, 2510 84m St S, Ste 18, Lakewood, WA 98499-9034 Puget Sound Energy -kristina.kvleftse.com, PO Box 97034, Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 MEDIA Federal Way Mirror-editor(cDfederalwavmirmr.com, 31919 151 Ave S, Ste 101, Federal Way, WA 98003 Tacoma News Tribune - newstipsGithenewstribune.cam, 1950 S State St, Tacoma, WA 98405 ORGANIZATIONS Federal Way Chamber of Commerce -rmartin@federalwaychamber.com, PO Box 3440, Federal Way, WA 98063 Master Builders Assoc. of King & Snohomish Counties-dhofimanQmhaks.com, 335 1161h Ave SE, Bellevue, WA 98004-6407 Sea/King Co Assoc/Realtors-samoacg,@concentric_net, 29839 1541h Ave SE, Kent, WA 98042-4557 WA Environmental Council -wec(@4wecnrotects.arg, 1402 3`d Ave, Ste 1400, Seattle, WA 98101-2179 INDIVIDUALS H. David Kaplan -h_d_kI934 altptmait,com, 30240 27`h Ave S, Federal Way, WA 98003 Property Owners Within the Planned Action Area and Within 600 feet of the Boundary (Per King County Assessor Records) t 'RECEIVED AN ELECTRONIC COPY (via listed email) OR CD OF ALL DOCUMENTS; ALL OTHERS RECEIVED ONLY COVER LETTER/NOTICE. Appendix 1 Page 2 Appendix 2 Transportation Impact Analysis