The URL can be used to link to this page

08-102817-UP; 08-102818FEDERAL WAY IRROR A SOUND PUBLISHING NEWSPAPER Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way — Community Development Dept. L-1462 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of six consecutive week(s), commencing on the 25th day of October, 2008 , and ending on the 25th day of October 2008, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $112.48 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 25th day of November, 2008. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way NOTARY pUBLIG STATE OF WASHINGTON TERYL A. HELLER My Appointment Expires Sept. 04. 2 1414 S. 3241h STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 v 253-925-5565 0 FAX: 253-925-5750 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 20th Avenue South Hellstop File No: 08-102818-00-SE Description: Master plan approval to construct a private helistop landing area as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center Church com- plex for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approxi- mately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM-3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the -Comprehensive Plan. Location: 33645 20th- Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, 253-835-2640 The lead agency for this proposal has deter- mined that it does not have a probable signffi- cant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under the Revised Cade of Wash- ington (RCW) 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environ- mental checkiist; a Noise Evaluation, prepared by Optimum Environment; an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the, Christian Faith Center; an Application to FAA; the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; Federal Way City Code: and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.060. ,Further information regarding this action is avail- able to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services at Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on November 10, 2008. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment dead- line. FWM 1462 Date of Publication: October 25, 2008 CITY OF Ak Federal November 21, 2008 Abbey Road Group, LLC Attn: Matt Cyr 923 Shaw Road, Suite A Puyallup, WA 98372 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: File #08-102817-00-UP; FORWARDING COMMENT LETTERS 20th Avenue South Heliport, 33645 201h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Cyr: I am forwarding two comment letters that were received by this Department in response to the issuance of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for this project. I will be sending a response to these letters shortly, and will forward a copy of those responses once they are completed. I have also received phone calls from Shirley Gilbraa, an adjacent property owner, who had questions about the noise study that was conducted. You have stated via a recent email that you will not be responding to neighbor's comments at this time, on behalf of your client, Christian Faith Center. I informed Mrs. Gilbraa she can submit her comments in writing to be included into the record or present her questions in person at the public hearing. Sincerely, Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner enc: Email from Tamara King Fax letter from Elizabeth Kari Doe. I. D. 47907 Joanne Long -Woods From: Matt Cyr [matt.cyr@abbeyroadgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:35 AM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: RE: 20th St. Helistop Hi Joanne, I discussed the idea of responding to neighbor's comments with my boss and client last week. At this time I do not have authorization to dedicate time to responding to neighbor's phone calls. I understand that Ms. Gulbraa has never supported any aspect of the church's project, and this led us to conclude that anything said to her will only be manipulated to oppose the project. I would suggest that she review the study or hire a professional to review the study and provide a counter study. As a personal side note, I have flown in many helicopters, done several emergency helicopter evacuations, and even took some helicopter pilot lessons in my past. There is a very large difference in noise associated with different types of helicopters. The noise comes from the rotors as they rotate to create lift. The size of the helicopter and the lift potential is what makes the difference. I would venture to guess that the Weyerhaeuser helicopter was a twin huey or Chinook. These are common forest service and forest fire helicopters because they are lifting helicopters, but they make a lot of noise. The helicopter we used for the study and will be used once approved is much quieter. It is the same helicopter used by all of the local news stations. They are used by these news stations because they don't create a great deal of noise which is a good thing since their helicopters operate in populated areas. I hope some of my personal remarks help, but I will not be contacting neighbors. Thank you, Matt From: Joanne Long -Woods [mailto:Joanne.Long-Woods@cityoffederalway.com] Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:01 AM To: Matt Carr Subject: 20th St. Helistop Matt: I got another call from Shirley Gulbraa, who is an adjacent property owner from the CFC. She has some questions about the noise evaluation and would like to have you call her. She wanted to know when it was taken and was the helicopter there when it was done. Last time she cited how loud the noise was from a helicopter that was going to Weyerhaeuser site on the weekend. It sounded like it was one of those large reconnaissance helicopters like the Ft. Lewis ones. I don't know if she realizes that the CFC helicopter is a smaller size or not. Anyway, I can't remember what you said last time I brought it up, but she wants to have you call her after 4PM today because she has some questions. I do remember when I talked to her last time, she didn't agree with the results of the study. In some cases, when a citizen doesn't agree with the results of reports submitted by professionals, we tell them they are welcome to hire their own consultant to conduct a noise study to refute the findings of the first study. Shirley's phone numbers are: (253) 838-9569 (H) (253) 740-4159 (C) She said please call her after 413M to day, I assume at the home phone number. Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner CITY OF CITY HALL iLE Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue S Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Elizabeth A. Kari November 26, 2008 2012 South 331" Street Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: File # 08-102818-000-00-SE; RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON DNS 201h Avenue South Heliport, 33645 201h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Kari: This is to acknowledge receipt of your comments on the issuance of a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued on the above -referenced case. We have taken your comments under advisement and have determined that the environmental determination will stand as issued. The environmental review of this project included review of submittal materials, including supplemental reports; an onsite visit to the property; review of the application for location approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); review of comments from City Departments and other agencies with jurisdiction; review of comments of concerned residents; and review of City codes and regulations. The previous location of the helistop was on the south side of the property, behind the new chapel building. However, the FAA observed that that proposed landing site was too close to the new building and to adjacent residences and was located in the parking area. The FAA denied approval of that location. The new location, in the open field directly west of the Interstate 5 corridor, was reviewed and approved by the FAA after a site visit to the property with the applicant's agent. The landing site in the field will be used when the school will be closed. The name was changed at the request of South King Fire & Rescue and our Public Works Department who could not approve the location of a "heliport" since that use could include storage of flammable fuels and/or equipment. As this landing pad will be used by a helicopter service for take off and landing only, the proposed use was changed to "helistop." The noise study was prepared by a professional firm that conducts noise studies on a regular basis, Optimum Environment. The standards they use are HUD standards and included analysis of noise levels near residential neighborhoods. I requested that the applicant submit an addendum to the noise study to identify any potential adverse impacts to the area generated at the new location. The study stated that since the new location was adjacent to the Interstate 5 corridor and the helicopter would be flying directly west from that corridor to the landing site, the new site would have less impact, not more. You are welcome to come in to review the files for this application or the previous applications to determine what the status is on each issue you are concerned about. I am enclosing a copy of the notice of the public hearing of this case for your reference. You will have an opportunity to submit additional comments at the public hearing. Sincerely, l� Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner enc: Notice of Public Hearing. Doc I.D. 47947 Nov 10 08 04:38p Elizabeth A Kari 2538748485 p.1 Elizabeth A. Kari 2012S331s'St Federal Way WA 98003 Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods City of Federal Way 33325 8" Ave S Federal Way WA 98063 November 10, 2008 20th Avenue South Heliport (Christian Faith Center) Dear Ms. Long -Woods, I am not all surprised by the City's finding in favor of Convict Casey. I expected that as it has been clear to me for many years that the City will do anything, reasonable or not, to please him- So far as I can see city staff are paid with citizen tax dollars, yet work for the very private CFC to the detriment of Federal Way residents. Regarding your comments on my past letter I never mentioned the Weyerhaeuser landing pad in that letter. I am certainly aware of it. It is used for emergency transport of medical emergencies to area hospitals. I have even known people who have been transported from there. I am not opposed to a helicopter site for air emergencies. This is the very definition of a "public good" or "public benefit". Convict Casey wanting to burn excess fossil fuel to keep up with the Paul Allens of the world and shave a good 45 minutes off of his commute time fails to meet that same standard_ I am glad to see that Weyerhaeuser agreed and had the spine to say "no." I only wish the city had the same fortitude. While you mention that I brought up the Auburn airport you failed to mention why it is not a viable option. You mention that the CFC submitted a noise evaluation by a licensed firm. If the CFC paid for a test you don't really expect me to believe it would be from someone who would have told them "no", do you? Please. As for their alleged noise not exceeding "federal standards" what exactly would those be? The same standards that allowed the third runway at SeaTac? Are they standards that have any relevance to landing aircraft in residential neighborhoods? I might add that just as I started writing this letter a helicopter flew quite low in proximity of my home office. I could read the numbers on its side. I was very aware of it. I've also been aware of several small aircraft today, no doubt en route to or from Auburn. Oh, and then there are those jet things that fly over my head from time to time, forcing me to close my windows in the summer (there's one right now). If those various aircraft meet the standard then probably nothing doesn't. That doesn't make helicopter takeoffs and landings appropriate for a residential neighborhood. As for being too near trees it is clear from the fir stumps dotting S 336" that the CFC has Nov 10 08 04:38p Elizabeth A Kari,---, 25,38748485 p.2 no qualms about cutting down trees. I expect this comes from the top as Convict Casey himself illegally cut down trees on his own property to improve his view (according to a King 5 news story from several years ago). I'm fascinated that somehow the change of the name of this project from "heliport" to "helistop" is supposed to make all the difference in the world. To use a controversial expression from our recent presidential campaign you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig. This project is still about one individual, under the guise of religion, wanting to fly his helicopter in and out of a residential neighborhood whenever he pleases. From your map it appears to be just across the street from a townhouse development. I guess that makes the noise ok. After all, under this thinking townhouse dwellers aren't real residents. It is also supposed to be "just north of where the school will be built." If there is going to be a "helistop" right next to a school how does that meet any standard of safety? Other than the brainwashed who would want to send their kids to a school where a helicopter could land in the schoolyard at anytime? As I stated previously I'm not convinced that once they have it won't be used far more often_ There is no mechanism for enforcement of the frequency or infrequency of its use once it is approved. This is the same group that claimed their followers would never violate the signs and barriers on 200 yet drive around the barriers straight onto 206 on a regular basis. If the city wants to make a buck they might try ticketing there. Oh, yeah, and we were promised sidewalks, too. Any idea where they might be? Oh, and while there won't be fuel stored don't you think there might just be a tad of oil etc that will run off into that "wetland buffer area"? I might also add that their whole build a school project was supposed to have already happened under their original agreement with the City. Since they ran out of money — repeatedly — the City has extended their agreement to who knows when (sort of a like a professor does for the lazy student who can't get his/her term paper completed on time). They still haven't fully completed (inside and out) even a single building. Since this heliport is now to go right by the school my guess is they have no intention of getting to that for years. Since they aren't able to complete their previously approved construction projects why is the City so determined to help them approve another? That's really unacceptable. The City ought to tell them to sell the helicopter and apply the proceeds to one of their already approved projects if they're really serious about completing them_ I also find the determination of nonsignificance as regards the City's Comprehensive Plan fascinating as well_ As I recall that document contains language indicating that the City shall not allow projects that are incompatible with neighborhoods. A heliport by any name seems completely incompatible with a neighborhood. Where in the Comprehensive Plan does it mention that helicopters and neighborhoods are a good match? Would you like a helicopter landing right down the street from you on a regular basis? Do you know many that would? If not then why is the City aiding and abetting this plan? During the approval process for the nightmare that is the CFC former Mayor Dean McColgan, when one of my neighbors mentioned this eventuality of a heliport (since Convict Casey had the chopper even then we could all see this corning) stated it would never happen. But since the Prison Convert Preacher can't make it through the weekend Nov 10 08 04:38p Elizabeth A Kari 2538748485 p.3 without his toy here we are. If this application for a helistop were from any other private individual (or even a business — but other than the CFC businesses aren't supposed to be allowed in residential neighborhoods) in a residential neighborhood would it have been deemed insignificant? I doubt it. I believe that if this application were for any other entity than Convict Casey the City would have seen this for what it is: a project for the glory of one man (and the detriment of residents) who is just too self important and lazy to make the commute from Everett by car. This is not a project for the City, this is not for the public good, there is no public benefit from this project, it only serves to bring obnoxious noise into a residential neighborhood at a time when residents expect peace and quiet. It is wholly unnecessary, both to the area and even for the CFC's mission of preaching. They just might need to adjust their schedule to accommodate a longer commute_ To me that seems a whole lot less disruptive than a helicopter. Sincerel�r, 4v� E th A. Kaxi Joanne Long -Woods From: Joanne Long -Woods Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:53 AM To: 'Sag1218@aol.com' Subject: RE: heli stop Attachments: heli stop Tamara: It is my understanding that the pastor attends services at two churches on Sundays, the one off of 336th and another one up north. Other than that, you can pose your question to the applicants agent at the public hearing, or I can just include your comments in the packet of information that goes to the Hearing Examiner. In any case, any comments I receive, including yours, will be forwarded to the applicant's agent for comment/response. Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner (253) 835-2640 Joanne Long -Woods From: Sag1218@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 3:45 AM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: heli stop Ms Long -Woods - The big questions is why does this church need a heli stop pad. What is so important that they can't continue to get around by automobile like the rest of us. Especially in these trying economic times. Tamara King 2100 S 336th St #R6 Federal Way WA 98003 Plan your next getaway with AOL Travel. Check out Toda 's Hot 5 Travel Deals? FILE CITY OF Federal Way October 24, 2008 RE: File # 08-102818-000-00-SE; 20TH AvE SOUTH HELISTOP Christian Faith Center, 33645 20th Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Adjacent Property Owners: I am writing to give you an update on the current status of this project and to tell you how the application has changed over the last couple months. Both the name and the location of the proposed landing area have been changed. The "heliport", by definition, would allow fueling, refueling, a permanent landing pad, etc. During the review of the project, the South King Fire Department identified that they could not approve a "heliport" in the proposed location, because a `heliport" allows a fueling station or storage of fuel in permanent structures. However, a "helistop" allows take off and landing of a helicopter, but does not have permanent structures that could either dispense or store fuel. Since the applicant does not intend to use the area more than once or twice a week and does not intend to have fueling capabilities at this location, the applicant has now requested approval of a "helistop." One of the requirements for land use approval to locate a "helistop" anywhere in the City, is that the applicant must seek and receive approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the location and proposed use of the facility. The FAA conducted a site visit to the property and identified that there were several areas of concern that would prevent them from approving the application as submitted. Specifically, the proximity of the landing pad to existing single-family residences, power poles, and trees, and the existing church building. The FAA, therefore, denied the first request for a heliport on the south side of the chapel building as proposed. The applicant has since met with the FAA on site to try to relocate the landing area to a more safe area on the property. The revised location of the proposed "helistop" is now proposed to be located on the northeast side of the existing church building, on a 67 ft. by 67 ft. area in the open grassy field, just north of where the school will be built and west of the wetland buffer area. The helicopter will travel north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor until it reaches the area close to the church property and then turn directly west towards the church property to land in the field. There will be no need to fly over the residential areas to reach the landing area. We have finished the environmental review of this case and have enclosed a copy of the environmental determination of nonsignificance. Once the comment period and appeal period on the environmental decision has lapsed (28 days from publication), we will schedule the case for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If you are a property owner within 300 ft. of the project area, you will get notice of the hearing date and will have an opportunity to submit additional comments and/or attend the hearing, if you choose to. If you have any questions on this proposal, you can reach me at 253-835-2640, or by email at: joanne.long- woods@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, J Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Doc. I.D. 47460 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.c ityoffe de ralw a_y.co rn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, � eckq C r `P-y I n1 hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of WasAngton, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice fq Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document waste❑,yd maille fI' ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or Posted to or at each of the attached addresses on t..Cil f-`'f 2008. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 10/24/2008 3:42:00 PM Postin Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street Subject Site - 33645 20th Avenue South K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 10/24/2008 3:42:00 PM CITY 40'::� �_ OF Federal Way NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 201h Avenue South Helistop File No: 08-102818-00-SE Description: Master plan approval to construct a private helistop landing area as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center Church complex for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM-3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the Comprehensive Plan. Location: 33645 20`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, 253-835-2640 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.2 1 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist; a Noise Evaluation, prepared by Optimum Environment; an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Christian Faith Center; an Application to FAA; the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; Federal Way City Code; and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services at Federal Way City Hail, 33325 8,h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on November 10, 2008. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on October 25, 2008. FILE CITY OF CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com October 24, 2008 Abbey Road Group, LLC Attn: Matt Cyr PO Box 1224 Puyallup, WA 98372 Re: File #08-102817-00=SE; ENVIRONMENTAL THRESHOLD DETERMINATION 20th Avenue South Helistop, 33645 201h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Dear Mr. Cyr: This office and other City staff have reviewed the environmental checklist, Noise Evaluation, DEIS, and application to the FAA that you submitted for the Master Plan approval for the 20tn Avenue South Helistop project. We have determined that the proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. As a result, an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). A copy of the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is enclosed. A 14-day comment period is required by the SEPA Rules (WAC 197-11-340). A notice inviting comments will be published in the Federal Way Mirror on October 25, 2008. At the end of the comment period, November 10, 2008, the department will determine if the DNS should be withdrawn, modified, or issued as proposed. All final determinations may be appealed within 14 days following the comment deadline. No licenses, permits, or approvals will be issued until completion of the appeal period. Our decision not to require an EIS does not mean that the license, permit, or approval you are seeking from the City has been granted. Approval or denial of the proposal will be made by the appropriate administrative or legislative body vested with that authority. The environmental record is considered by the decision maker(s) and conditions will be imposed to reduce identified environmental impacts, as long as the conditions are based on adopted and designated City policy. After a final decision has been made on your proposal (i.e., after a permit has been issued or City Council action taken, as applicable), you may, but are not required to, publish a Notice of Action as set forth in RCW 43.21C.075. The Notice of Action sets forth a time period after which no legal challenges regarding the proposal's compliance with SEPA can be made. A copy of the Notice of Action form and copies of RCW 43.21C.080 and WAC 197-11-680 providing instructions for giving this notice are available from the Department of Community Development Services. October 24, 2008 Page 2 If you need further assistance, feel free to contact Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods at 253-835- 2640, orioanne.long-woods@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Greg Fewins, Director Department of Community Development Services enc: DNS Staff Report c: Christian Faith Center, 33645 20'b Avenue. South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plan Review Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Chris Ingham, South King Fire and Rescue 08-102818 Doc. I.D. 47441 OF Fed4�=V eral Way 41k DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederc3twciy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, � hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on D A 0 / 2008. Project Name ttuL File Number(s) d 9 -/b )- (2) 3- --S C _ _ Signature Date lb',�Y-b? K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /3/20DB 4:53:00 PM 40k CITY OF Federal Way October 24, 2008 RE: File # 08-102818-000-00-SE; 20TH AVE SOUTH HELISTOP Christian Faith Center, 33645 20th Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Adjacent Property Owners: I am writing to give you an update on the current status of this project and to tell you how the application has changed over the last couple months. Both the name and the location of the proposed landing area have been changed. The "heliport", by definition, would allow fueling, refueling, a permanent landing pad, etc. During the review of the project, the South King Fire Department identified that they could not approve a "heliport" in the proposed location, because a `heliport" allows a fueling station or storage of fuel in permanent structures. However, a "helistop" allows take off and landing of a helicopter, but does not have permanent structures that could either dispense or store fuel. Since the applicant does not intend to use the area more than once or twice a week and does not intend to have fueling capabilities at this location, the applicant has now requested approval of a "helistop." One of the requirements for land use approval to locate a "helistop" anywhere in the City, is that the applicant must seek and receive approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the location and proposed use of the facility. The FAA conducted a site visit to the property and identified that there were several areas of concern that would prevent them from approving the application as submitted. Specifically, the proximity of the landing pad to existing single-family residences, power poles, and trees, and the existing church building. The FAA, therefore, denied the first request for a heliport on the south side of the chapel building as proposed. The applicant has since met with the FAA on site to try to relocate the landing area to a mote safe area on the property. The revised location of the proposed "helistop" is now proposed to be located on the northeast side of the existing church building, on a 67 ft. by 67 ft. area in the open grassy field, just north of where the school will be built and west of the wetland buffer area. The helicopter will travel north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor until it reaches the area close to the church property and then turn directly west towards the church property to land in the field. There will be no need to fly over the residential areas to reach the landing area. We have finished the environmental review of this case and have enclosed a copy of the environmental determination of nonsignificance. Once the comment period and appeal period on the environmental decision has lapsed (28 days from publication), we will schedule the case for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If you are a property owner within 300 ft. of the project area, you will get notice of the hearing date and will have an opportunity to submit additional comments and/or attend the hearing, if you choose to. If you have any questions on this proposal, you can reach me at 253-835-2640, or by email at: joanne.long- woods@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner c Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Doc. I.D. 47460 a� � Federal Way NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 201h Avenue South Helistop File No: 08-102818-00-SE Description: Master plan approval to construct a private helistop landing area as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center Church complex for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM-3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the Comprehensive Plan. Location: 33645 20t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, 253-835-2640 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist; a Noise Evaluation, prepared by Optimum Environment; an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Christian Faith Center; an Application to FAA; the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; Federal Way City Code; and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.060. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services at Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on November 10, 2008. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on October 25, 2008. loth Avenue South Helistop Vicinity Map S 333 5T _--��--� - 33 ST L-L I • Z I� . LN f I I II co II S 336 ST ' �° �; 1 S 336 ST . i Subject S 11 I � f r Co. f ! ,$341STti f [j 8.341 ST �> U), _ Sq---j J�� `FY s C _. - . I------- J ' I - Federal Way File 08-102818-00-SE Propsed Master Plan approval to locatr private helistop landing pad as an approvcd use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet Print Map Page Page 1 of 3 kg King Cowft Parcel Map and Data 0025 Op75 0076 0040 ur 0182 9112 0013, m 13102_ 6zfo Ia D035 o030 0050 �n2d ^aia3 a Td9 000 0 rf7 r— � �.:. 0220 ? d1w 022y z z 9025 W70 c L27-'9n69 e >t�uvurvo� . n r T 9 r'f n r VI i V Vr rwr-nru_ vv, BUILDING DEPT. r, 90 6 Pau 1 � 1r �afu 9D03 ` gab$ ',-Federal Way = r� fld0 9072 90A0 gr3r�J 9324 - 9039 51047 f r ! 016n 6110 y 01 _ O0S0 9 rs0; As2 g063 9i185 9nsi r of40 0120 smtsrPL 1 aasnr W52 906dJ OofO Q020 N � 8053 9f3I �Y 9002 9017 90D7 W21 44 9p6B2!]Q�3 Kmg ctiniy.. 0095 or3r5 0s s'9ft Parcel Number 2121049004 Address 33645 20TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. • Parcel Number 2121049024 Parcel Number 2121049003 Address 1700 S 340TH ST Address Zipcode 98003 Zipcode T F MCELROY Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER Taxpayer TEMPLE ASSN Parcel Number 2121049027 Parcel Number 2121049026 33616 PACIFIC Address Address HWY S Zipcode Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER Taxpayer RED CANOE CREDIT UNION Parcel Number 2121049033 Parcel Number 2121049039 Address 34114 21 ST AVE S Address 1828 S 340TH ST Zipcode 98003 http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print—Process. asp 10/17/2008 Print Map Page Page 2 of 3 Taxpayer SCHINDLER FMLY LTD Zipcode 98003 PRTNRSHP Taxpayer LLOYD ROBERT R Parcel Number 2121049040 Parcel Number 2121049041 Address 1816 S 340TH ST Address 1724 S 340TH ST Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer HYPPA ROGER K+KRISTINE L Taxpayer FIELD ILA W Parcel Number 2121049047 Parcel Number 2121049042 Address 1800 S 340TH ST Address 1920 S 340TH ST Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer FIELD ILA W Taxpayer VALIANI RUDY+SHERIL Parcel Number 2121049050 Parcel Number 2121049048 34020 PACIFIC Address 2025 S 341 ST PL Address HWY S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer A KALCHIK REALTY LLC Taxpayer T F M TEMPLE ASSOC Parcel Number 2121049061 Parcel Number 2121049060 Address 2011 S 341 ST PL Address 2102 S 341 ST PL Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer INHERITANCE L L C Taxpayer R& K PROPERTIES LLC Parcel Number 2121049069 Parcel Number 2121049068 Address 33838 PACIFIC HWY S Address Zipcode 98003 Zipcode Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER Parcel Number 2121049085 Parcel Number 2121049082 Address Address Zipcode Zipcode Taxpayer FANCHER THOMAS & DIANNA Taxpayer R & K PROPERTIES LLC Parcel Number 3903800060 Parcel Number 3903800050 Address 1925 S 341 ST PL Address Zipcode 98003 Zipcode Taxpayer CASTELLAR JOSE & EVELYN Taxpayer HUYNH THUQUAA Q+NGO THU A Parcel Number 3903800100 Parcel Number 3903800070 Address 1908 S 341 ST PL Address 34008 18TH PL S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer JOMAR INVESTMENTS Taxpayer STEPHENS CARL ji R Parcel Number 3903800110 Parcel Number 3903800160 Address 1704 S 341 ST ST Address 34004 16TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 http://www5.metroke.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 10/17/2008 Print Map Page Page 3 of 3 Taxpayer SPECTRUM BUSINESS PARK & I Taxpayer INSTITUTE FOR 1 SPECTRUM PLAZA L L C FAMILY DEVELO Parcel Number 4129400010 Parcel Number 4129400005 Address 33531 18TH AVE S Address 33527 18TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer NGUYEN TRI Taxpayer BUCK DALE + BETTY Parcel Number 4129400040 Parcel Number 4129400045 Address 33518 18TH AVE S Address 33526 18TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer ARAGON ANA MIRIAM Taxpayer GRAHAM CHERYL CORTEZ+BE A Parcel Number 4129400050 Parcel Number 7880700000 Address 33532 18TH AVE S Address 1820 S 336TH ST Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer PAGE THOMAS K Taxpayer Parcel Number 7978200096 Parcel Number 7978200070 Address 1812 S 336TH ST Address 1820 S 336TH ST Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer CHOE HAEWON T Taxpayer MILLER BARBARA FOX Parcel Number 7978200100 Parcel Number 7978200101 Address 1860 S 336TH ST Address 33357 20TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer 920 NORTH 100TH STREET L L Taxpayer GULBRAA A R Parcel Number 7978200106 Parcel Number 7978200103 Address 33355 20TH AVE S Address 33366 20TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer TURNBULL BARRY Taxpayer 920 NORTH 100TH STREETLLC Parcel Number 7978200108 Address 33350 20TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer 920 NORTH 100TH STREET LLC King. County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Piint_Process.asp 10/17/2008 Print Map Page Page 1 of 2 i+ Home I News I services Parcel Map and Data 0076 0090 0182 dish !I/ 0102 �021 35 ��^ Ai08 0010 0070 Ai03 — OA�rs ;02,?3' 3 � Q2. uracrr 0045 009617- j wo6 1 .-`1. _ 22i6f, ' L�12t0 80D3 ir. i 9004 f 4 Federal Wary goo f 9002 ,1 904i 9040 9039 9047 9042 S 300TH ST h Oi00 0060 A080 3[�81 i9LtiGi 9085 +' r r' 0040 9060 .0033 0020x(}0030g an0S0 9046 i 0� 142it Parcel Number 2121049003 Address Zipcode Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map Is prohibited except by written Dermission of Kinv Couniv." Parcel Number 2121049004 Parcel Number 2121049061 Address 33645 20TH AVE S Address 2102 S 341 ST PL Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER Taxpayer R & K PROPERTIES LLC Parcel Number 2121049082 Parcel Number 2121049085 Address Address Zipcode Zipcode Taxpayer R THOMAS & Taxpayer R & K PROPERTIES LLC DIANNA IANNA Parcel Number 2596200000 Parcel Number 2897600000 Address 2100 S 336TH ST Address 2210 S 336TH ST Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer Taxpayer http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 10/17/2008 Print Map Page Page 2 of 2 Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 7978200100 1860 S 336TH ST 98003 920 NORTH 100TH STREET Parcel Number Address Zipcode Taxpayer 7978200101 33357 20TH AVE S 98003 GULBRAA A R Parcel Number 7978200106 Parcel Number 7978200108 Address 33366 20TH AVE S Address 33350 20TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer 920 NORTH 100TH STREET Taxpayer 920 NORTH 100TH LLC STREET LLC Parcel Number 7978200220 Parcel Number 7978200225 Address 2246 S 336TH ST Address 2250 S 336TH ST Zipcode 98003 Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer SINGH KAMLESHWAR+LALITA Taxpayer GARCIA MARIA in County I GIs Center D News j Sery ces I Comments I Bearch By,Visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 10/17/2008 MAILING LIST 20th Avenue South Heliport Mailing Labels MAIL PARCEL NUMBER JOWNER LAST NAME OWNER FIRST NAME IMAILAIDDRESS MAIL CITY I STATE I MAIL ZIP 2121049003 Christian Faith Center 2121049024 T F Mcelroy Temple Assn. 2121049026 Christian Faith Center 2121049027 Red Canoe Credit Union Schindler Family LTD 2121049033 Partnership 2121049039 Lloyd 2121049040 Hyppa 2121049041 Field 2121049042 Field 2121049047 Valiani 2121049048 A Kalchik Realty LLC 2121049050 TFM Temple Association 2121049060 Inheritance LLC 2121049061 R & K Properties LLC 2121049068 Christian Faith Center 2121049069 Christian Faith Center 2121049082 Fancher 2121049085 R & K Properties LLC 2566200660 Cerda 2596200010 Sanford 2596200020 Allen 2596200030 Swisher 2596200040 Barrett 2596200050 Morgan 2596200060 Ambriz 2596200070 McCurry 2596200080 Love 2596200090 Tran 2596200100 White 2596200110 Overlin 2596200120 Strimple 2596200130 McCurry 2596200140 McRae Robert R. Roger K. & Kristine L. Ila W. Ila W. Rudy & Sheri L. c/o Lewelyn Real Estate Thomas & Dianna Lorena Wesley J. Debra C. & Stephen F. Harriet G. Mark P. & Danae C.M. Owen C. & Audrey M. Hortencia & Batres Jim Tamara G. Dwayne & Jamell Dung t. & Le Trinh T. Shaka C. Ronald D. Joan E. Dennesha Luana Marie 33645 2Uth Ave. 5. Federal Way WA 96UU3 PO Box 3121 Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 98600 Seattle WA 98198 PO Box 869 Longview WA 98632 34114 21st Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 3889 Federal Way WA 98063 20136 47th Ave. NE. Seattle WA 98155 1724 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 1800 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 1920 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 880608 San Diego CA 92168 PO Box 3121 Federal Way WA 98003 2011 S. 341st PI. Federal Way WA 98003 16510 218th Ave. Orting WA 98360 PO Box 902 Kent WA 98035 33645 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 1705 61st St. NE Tacoma WA 98422 16510 218th Ave. Orting WA 98360 2100 S 336th St. #M5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #A1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #A2 Federal Way WA 98003 4318 183rd Ave. E. Lake Tapps WA 98391 2100 S 336th St. #A4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. B1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #132 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C4 Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 2596200150 Davis Shawn M. 2100 S 336th St. #C5 Federal Way WA 98003 Revised 2596200160 Leung Yat F. & Mei Leung 2100 S 336th St. #D1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200170 Lopez Maribel 2100 S 336th St. #D2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200180 LaSalle Bank National Assn. 3476 Statesview Blvd Fort Mill SC 29715 2596200190 Pyzhivskyy Lyudmila & Vladimi 2100 S 336th St. #D4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200200 Graham Janice C. 2100 S 336th St. #D5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200210 Poland John L. & Cynthia P. 2100 S 336th St. #E1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200220 Ponce Rufugio M. 2100 S 336th St. #E2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200230 Young Delores D. 2100 S 336th St. #E3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200240 Zimmerman Peter 2100 S 336th St. #E4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200250 Migwi Esther & Njiru Elias 2100 S 336th St. #F1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200260 Day Katherine 2100 S 336th St. #F2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200270 Guerro Rene & Susana Lopez 37110 42nd AVE S Auburn WA 98003 2596200280 Lie Shuen P. 2100 S 336th St. #F4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200290 Pace Jennifer L. 2100 S 336th St. #F5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200300 Robertson Gary 2100 S 336th St. #G1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200310 Pak Ki C. & Eun H. 2100 S 336th St. #G2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200320 Faga Victoria & Tuualea M. & Lei 2100 S 336th St. #G3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200330 McElroy John L. & Cynthia P. 2100 S 336th St. #G4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200340 Hefner Harold & Mary 18104 121 st AVE E Puyallup WA 98374 2596200350 Taylor Michael C. & Marlene M. 32513 2nd AVE SW Federal Way WA 98023 2596200360 Willingham Matti 2100 S 336th St. #H2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200370 Smith Elizabeth & Shaun 2100 S 336th St. #H3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200380 Hiva Janna Kay 2100 S 336th St. #H4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200390 Jankowska Wanda 2100 S 336th St. #H5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200400 Park Myung Jun 2100 S 336th St. #11 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200410 Bloy Howard J. & Meta D. 2100 S 336th St. #12 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200420 Shi Yin Lai 2100 S 336th St. #13 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200430 Mao Xiaohua Robert & Ting Liu 2100 S 336th St. #J1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200440 Chen Hong Mei 2100 S 336th St. #15 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200450 Stark Janet L. 2100 S 336th St. #16 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200460 Mao Xiaohua Robert & Ting Liu 2100 S. 336th St. #J1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200470 May Dana M. 2100 S 336th St. #J2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200480 Vikse Sylvia D. 2100 S 336th St. #J3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200490 Beltran Jose 2100 S 336th St. #J4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200500 Nguyen Thao T. 2100 S 336th St. #J5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200510 Calvet Celine M. & Woodall Ani 2100 S 336th St. #J6 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200520 Aguilar Daniel & Flor 2100 S 336th St. #K1 Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 2596200530 2596200540 2596200550 2596200560 2596200570 2596200580 2596200590 2596200600 2596200610 2596200620 2596200630 2596200640 2596200650 2596200670 2596200680 2596200690 2596200700 2596200710 2596200720 2596200730 2596200740 2596200750 2596200760 2596200770 2596200780 2596200790 2596200800 2596200810 2596200820 2596200830 2596200840 2596200850 2596200860 2596200870 2596200880 2596200890 2596200900 2596200910 2596200920 2596200930 Arsenault Ishiwata Paden Vazquez Rice -Kyles Messerle Lish Azar Hodo McKay Beluga Chin Washington Ward Figueroa Monson Walker Leung Sennott Long Henry Hadler Matsuno Cabitac Rhyner Yi Skoog Kingori Cree, Jr. Kim Chae Sizemore Rodriguez Kim Julio Meza Bernard Flores Owen Howard Colleen M. Tomio Kimberly Maree Maria Elene Pascaci Simone Bruce E. Enoch Jung Loretta R. Jonah & Nancy Yuriy L. & Svitlana I. Chua Siew Jeffrey J. Chris & Anna Pedro Roxanne & Phyllis A. Virginia & Njenga Mutu Sing Fong & Shui Lan Jan A. Kelly R. James & Carol Robert & Karena Maki Loreto C. Albert A. Hyon Hui Barbara Anne Wynterae Gordon J. Chong So & Kyung Ja Byung Kwan Charles & Anastasia Lourdes M. Sun Pompeo & Imelda Martina & Veronica Brian K. Jose & Martha Daniel T. & Schulke Krist Michael L. & Kim R. 2100 S 336th St. #K2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #L1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #L2 Federal Way WA 98003 4530 Montrose Cir. Anchorage AK 99515 2100 S. 336th St. #L4 Federal Way WA 98003 32523 8th Ave SW Federal Way WA 98023 2100 S 336th St. #M2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-01 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-02 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-03 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-04 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-05 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-06 Federal Way WA 98003 8014 34th Ave S. Seattle WA 98118 28710 34th Ave S.#C3 Auburn WA 98001 2100 S 336th St. #P3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q6 Federal Way WA 98003 16601 25th Ave SE Burien WA 98166 2100 S 336th St. #R2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #R3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #R4 Federal Way WA 98003 Revised MAILING LIST 2596200940 2596200950 2897600010 2897600020 2897600030 2897600040 2897600050 2897600060 2897600070 2897600080 2897600090 2897600100 2897600110 2897600120 2897600130 2897600140 2897600150 2897600160 2897600170 2897600180 2897600190 2897600200 2897600210 2897600220 2897600230 2897600240 2897600250 2897600260 2897600270 2897600280 2897600290 3903800050 3903800060 3903800070 3903800100 3903800110 3903800160 4129400010 Aratani King Saeger Carroll Creson Gandara Bourg Lockwood Everett Garrett Kingori Larsen Land Kravchuk Johnson lyar Williams Jenkins Gerdes Kim Pennini Ilar Kipper Miller Diaz Beatty Chang Kirby Buck Lindsley Maurus Castellar Huynh Jomar Investments Stephens Spectrum Business Park / Plaza LLC Institute for Family Development Buck Michael Adrian Tamara J. Rachel M. Barbara Dennis M. Zachary & Jennifer Steven L. & Pacheco Desiree J. Larry & Pachman Teren Nanette K. Eunah Jette M. Henrietta M. Vyacheslav & Nataliy Michael J. & Gonzalez Gughanathan Terence Javon Don H. Jeffery & Glory Nancy D. Jeremy Cirilo V., Jr. Craig J. & Tracy Roeske Hyon Yun Juli D. Teresa A. Roberta Anne Marie Betsy J. Tammy M. Robert E. Jose & Evelyn Quang Q. & Ngo Thu A Carl R. Dale & Betty 2100 S 336th St. #R5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #R6 Federal Way WA 98003 2210 S 336th ST, #101 Federal Way WA 98003 29734 52nd AVE S Auburn WA 98001 2210 S 336th St. #103 Federal Way WA 98003 2210 S 336th St. #104 Federal Way WA 98003 2210 S 336th St. #105 Federal Way WA 98003 2212 S 336th ST, #201 Federal Way WA 98003 2212 S 336th St. #202 Federal Way WA 98003 2212 S 336th St. #203 Federal Way WA 98003 2212 S 336th St. #204 Federal Way WA 98003 2212 S 336th St. #205 Federal Way WA 98003 2212 S 336th St. #301 Federal Way WA 98003 2212 S 336th St. #302 Federal Way WA 98003 2210 S 336th St. #303 Federal Way WA 98003 2216 S 336th St. #304 Federal Way WA 98003 2216 S 336th St. #305 Federal Way WA 98003 2220 S 336th St. #401 Federal Way WA 98003 2220 S 336th St. #402 Federal Way WA 98003 2220 S 336th St. #403 Federal Way WA 98003 2220 S 336th St. #404 Federal Way WA 98003 2220 S 336th St. #405 Federal Way WA 98003 2214 S 336th St. #501 Federal Way WA 98003 2214 S 336th St. #502 Federal Way WA 98003 2214 S 336th St. #503 Federal Way WA 98003 2220 S 336th St. #504 Federal Way WA 98003 2214 S 336th St. #601 Federal Way WA 98003 2218 S 336th St. #602 Federal Way WA 98003 2218 S 336th St. #603 Federal Way WA 98003 2218 S 336th St. #604 Federal Way WA 98003 2218 S 336th St. #605 Federal Way WA 98003 32517 39th PI. SW. Federal Way WA 98023 2202 12th Ct. NW. Auburn WA 98001 321 S. 302nd PI. Federal Way WA 98003 34008 18th PI. S. Federal Way WA 98003 3620 100th St. SW. Tacoma WA 98499 34004 16th Ave. S. #200 Federal Way WA 98003 404 S. 305th Federal Way WA 98003 Revised MAILING LIST 4129400040 Nguyen Tri 4229 S. 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 4129400040 Aragon Ana Miriam Cortez 33518 18th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 4129400045 Graham Cheryl A. 33526 18th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 4129400050 Page Thomas K. 605 SW. 316th Federal Way WA 98023 7880700010 Miller Esther K. 1830 S. 336th St. #A101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700020 Mayner Betty J. 1830 S. 336th St. #A102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700030 Carlson Mojgan K. 1427 SW. 352nd Ct. Federal Way WA 98023 7880700040 Yang Jian 1830 S. 336th St. #A202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700050 Whiting Leona M. 1830 S. 336th St. #B101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700060 Cleveland Karen E. 1830 S. 336th St. #13102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700070 Hendrix Jonny L. 1830 S. 336th St. #13201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700080 Sim Kelly 2316 Olympia Ave. NE. Renton WA 98056 7880700090 Reeder Barbara A. 1830 S. 336th St. #C101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700100 Kelly Noreene V. 1830 S. 336th St. #C102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700110 Madfai Mark C. & Lejla 9624 143rd Ave. SE. Renton WA 98059 7880700120 Altizer Caryl J. 1830 S. 336th St. #C202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700130 Atkinson Teresa 1820 S. 336th St. #D101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700140 Ganzkow Deborah A. 1830 S. 336th St. #D102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700150 Procaccio Rosella 1830 S. 336th St. #D201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700160 Goble Brigitte E. 1830 S. 336th St. #D202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700170 Walters Jimmie 1830 S. 336th St. #E101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700180 Sissons Lisha 1830 S. 336th St. #E102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700190 Was Lucyna 1830 S. 336th St. #E201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700200 Becker Shannon L. 1830 S. 336th St. #E202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700210 Bussey Marsha A. 1830 S. 336th St. #F101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700220 Warren Judith M. 1830 S. 336th St. #F102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700230 Livett William M. 1830 S. 336th St. #F201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700240 Mroczek Dariusz & Anna 1913 63rd Ave. NE. Tacoma WA 98422 7880700250 Anderson Craig 1820 S. 336th St. #G101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700260 Kirk Janice & Jerry 37929 53rd Ave. S. Auburn WA 98001 7880700270 Cho Jin 1830 S. 336th St. #G201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700280 Corwin Mark 819 18th St. SW. Puyallup WA 98371 7880700290 Stokes Cynthia A. 1830 S. 336th St. #H101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700300 Moore Jean S. 1830 S. 336th St. #H102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700310 Desmet Carol J. 1830 S. 336th St. #H201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700320 Grigoruk Victor & Bugaychuk 1830 S. 336th St. #H202 Federal Way WA 98003 7978200070 Choe Haewon T. 1802 S. Jackson Ave. Tacoma WA 98465 7978200096 Miller Barbara Fox 1820 S. 336th St. Federal Way WA 98003 7978200100 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200100 Turnbull Barry 33355 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 7978200101 Gulbraa A. R. 33357 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 7978200106 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200108 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200220 Singh Kamleshwar & Lalita 18826 39TH Ave. S. Seattle WA 98188 7978200226 Garcia Maria 2250 & 336th St. Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Xe-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on �2t, 2008. Project Name a File Number(s) 0'0 -/b i?- st Signature V y Date )b - -a K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /3/2008 4:53:00 PM 411k OF Federal Way NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 20tb Avenue South Helistop File No: 08-102818-00-SE Description: Master plan approval to construct a private helistop landing area as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center Church complex for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM-3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the Comprehensive Plan. Location: 33645 20t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, 253-835-2640 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist; a Noise Evaluation, prepared by Optimum Environment; an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Christian Faith Center; an Application to FAA; the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; Federal Way City Code; and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31C.060. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Services at Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8" Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9719. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on November 10, 2008. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on October 25, 2008. loth Avenue South Helistop Vicinity Map CN C��[ " 5 333 ST j 31STr_3,- .... ! �— - �� k i I N �. co I� I � If Lr4 ' s 344 ST _ J___L j C� CO, A�k CITY OF Federal Way File 08-102818-00-SE Propsed Master Plan approval to locate a private helistop landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way J N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet CITY , a� Federal Way FILL NOTICE DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 201h Avenue South Helistop File No: 08-102818-00-SE Description: Master plan approval to construct a private helistop landing area as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center Church complex for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM-3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the Comprehensive Plan. Location: 33645 20'b Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, 253-835-2640 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist; a Noise Evaluation, prepared by Optimum Environment; an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Christian Faith Center; an Application to FAA; the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; Federal Way City Code; and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to RCW 43.31 C.060. Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Federal Way Department of Community Development Semites at Federal Way City Hall, 33325 80r Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on November 10, 2008. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of the above comment deadline. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on October 25, 2008. loth Avenue South Helistop Vicinity Map S 333 5T N I N 33 , I { S 354 ry r LN S 336 ST' r m I I -� Ir I I � I i r :S 3A4 ST IF 1- � LS 341 St iIS341ST�. cv- -1 _..- J' C.. ,NCO IT. CITY OF Federal Way File 08-102818-00-SE Propsed Master Plan approval to locat private helistop landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet 4k 4::� FeOF deral Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.Qiiyoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION , I �-1 I, ) 2 M -At z '1 >C hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner Notice of Environmental Determination Notice of Planning Commission Public of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) 4, sir as Hearing ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was nailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 0 a a y : Zoos. Project Name File Number(s) Signature D$ -16 D 8/g- 5E Date 16 - -) :D 9 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribufion.doc/Last printed 1 /3/2008 4:53:00 PM 4k CITY OF 40'::tt=;P Federal Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 20tb Avenue South Helistop File No: 08-102818-00-SE Description: Master plan approval to construct a private helistop landing site as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center for air taxi pick up and drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned "RM-3600" and designated as "Multi - Family" in the Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC Attn: Matt Cyr PO Box 1224 Puyallup, WA 98372 Location: 33645 20th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA, in the NE 1/4 Sec. 21, T21N, R4E, W.M., Tax Parcels: #2121049003 and #2121049004. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, 253-835-2640 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision on this proposed development based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist; a Noise Evaluation, prepared by Optimum Environment, dated June 9, 2008; a DEIS for the Christian Faith Center, dated 2003; the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; Federal Way City Code; and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Department of Community Development Services. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposal is for Master Plan approval (Process IV approval) to locate a helistop landing area on the site of the Christian Faith Center church facility. The original application requested approval to locate a heliport south of the church building, in an existing parking lot. However, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would not approve the application for the location, citing that it was not a safe location because it was too close to adjacent residents' houses and too close to the existing building. Also, South King Fire and Rescue would not approve the location of a "heliport" because by definition, a heliport is a permanent landing area with structures that may store flammable fluids. However, a "helistop" is just a landing area that does not have any permanent structures and is used for landing and take off only. The applicant was then required to relocate the landing area and has requested approval of a helistop rather than a heliport. 2. The revised site plan shows that the proposed helistop has been relocated to a vacant, grassy field on the northeast side of Parcel #2121049003, just north of where a pad has been prepared for a new private school, which is proposed to be built within 2-3 years. No additional clearing or grading is being proposed at this location. 3. The site for the helistop is on one of two parcels at the Christian Faith Center in an area zoned RM- 3600, requiring a minimum lot size of 3,600 sq. ft. The Comprehensive Plan designation in this area is Multi -Family Residential. Churches and accessory uses are permitted. 4. The "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, File No. 08-102818-00-SE" is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Federal Way's Comprehensive Plan Policies adopted by Federal Way, and contained within the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), serve as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. The following components of the FWCP support the conditions for the development. TG8: a. Support the area's economy by assuring residents and area employers access to a full range of travel modes, including intercity airport facilities, while maintaining the quality of life reflected in the plan vision. b. Provide guided opportunities for the improvement of heliport facilities and services in and around the City. SEPA DETERMINATION Based on the above policies and analysis, and given the fact that the applicant has relocated the helistop landing in conjunction with the recommendation of the Federal Aviation Administration, a determination of nonsignificance is being issued for this project. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on November 10, 2008. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) Page 2 20"' Avenue South Helistop File No: 08-102818-00-SE/Doc LD.47442 f the above comment deadline. You may appeal this determination to the City of Federal Way, no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2008, by a letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Greg Fewins Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services Address: 33325 80' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Date Issued: October 25, 2008 Signature: Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) 20`h Avenue South Helistop Page 3 File No: 08-102818-00-SE/Doc. LD 47442 loth Avenue South Helistop Vicinity Map S 333 ST IS 333 $T i i..IV S336ST'- S 336 STi � I I it - - rl I r � I ' I r I J S 340 ST I 1 I C1 S 341 ST I I Q I ! I S 344 ST C� CITY OF Federal Way File 08-102818-00-SE Propsed Master Plan approval to locatc private helistop landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet 118/i0915 ,�I@Ad o8i►'g algitedwoo ww 9 x tuw 9Z lew�N ap 0119MI13 I i)`) b l'.',14 � S: - F r nA-i �' -1 LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST PO BOX 4249 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1 ST AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 MICHAEL FELDMAN AVIATION PLANNING SEATAC PO BOX 68727 SEATTLE WA 98168-0727 DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC PO BOX 47703 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 Federal Aviation Admin_ Attn: Paul Holmquist Seattle ADO 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Ste 250 Renton, WA 98057 WSDOT ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PO BOX 47331 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 label size 1 x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery` 5160/8160 Etiquette de format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avere5160/8160 lc J i 1 v ,A W ` FEMA US ARMY�CORPSJENGINEERS JOE HENRY f REGION 10 NTH DIV ATTN REGULATORY BRANCH NATUFA� RESOURCES CVN SVC 130 228TH ST SW PO BOX 37 5 935 POW�q AVE SW BOTHELL WA 98021-9796 SEATTLE W 98124 RENTON WA`98055 EPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC DEPT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SEC WSDOT ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS 1200 6T" AV'E" MD-126 PO BOX 47703 REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SEATTLEIVA9$101 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7703 PO BOX 47331 OLYMPIA WA 98504-7331 RAMON PAZOOKK JAMEY TAYLOR WA NATURAL/HERITAGE SNO-KING`PLA NNING MGR WSDOT 50 KING COUNTY DNR A CENTER DNR PO BOX\47015 PO BOX 014 PO BOX 330310 SEATTLE�VA 98133-9710 OLYMPIA*A 98504-7015 OLYMI?IA 98504-7014 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY & RANDY PEARSON HISTORIC PRESERVATION WA STATE D T WILDLIFE 600 CAPIWAS STATEPARKS PO BOX 48343 OLYMPIAII WAY N . 98501-1091 PO B❑ 66$ OLYMPIA - 98 4-8343 OLYMPIA 98504-2668 JULIE STOFEL TRAVIS NELSON LARRY FIS R WD WDFW, WD REGION OFFICE PO BO}�3249 1775 )2 VE NW STE 201 1601$ fI11fL CREEK BLV❑ PUYPLLUP WA 98373 ISSAQUAH A 98027 MILL CREE A 98012 US FISH 8� Witp�FE SERVCE DOH - DIV OF DRINKING WATER ATTN SEPA REVIEW pf ENV DOC MRNTS REVIEWER PUGET SO • ❑ C N AIR AGENCY 510 ❑ESMON D] SE #102 PO BOX 47422 1904 3R° AN TE105 LACEY WA 8503 _ SEATTLE•WA6101-3317 OLYMPIA W 98504 7822 PORT G F TL�COMA � PSRC ENVIRON ENTAL DEPT PORT F TILE GROWTH ANAGEMENT DEPT PO BOX 09 PO BOX 7 SEATT E 9$111 1011 WEST . NAVE #500 TACOM W�\98401-1837 SEATTLE WA 8104-1040 KC WASTEW TER TREATMENT GARY KRI EDT PERRY WEINBERG ENVIR NTAL PLN OAP KING CO RANSIT DIV M5 KSC-V 05 ENV PLAN MS KSC-TR-0431 SOUND TRANSIT 201 S JA¢�KSON ST 201 S JA SO 401 S JACKSON ST SEATTLE WA 98104-3855 SEA WA 98104-3856 SEATTLE'WA 98104-2826 LISA DINSMORE SOUTHtING OUNTY KING COUNTY PARKS LAND US SVC KCDDES REGION L ATER ASSOCIATION PROPS MANAGEMENT 900 OAKESDALE AVE SW 27224 14 AVE SE PO BO 17 RENTON WA 98057-5212 KENT WA 98 2 REDM ND WA 98073-3517 ROD HANSEN SOLID WASTE DIV LEE ROR AN KC BOON EVIEW BOARD KING CO DEPT F NATURAL RES PUBLIC. HE SEATTLE/KING 810 THIRD A STE 608 201 S JACKSO �'ST STE 701 401 FIF HAVE STE 1100 SEATTLE W 9$ 4-1693 SEATTLE Wg 981[]4-3855 SEATTLE WA 98104 KING CO R AD DIVISION GERI WALKER LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DIST COUNTY RO DS ENGINEER FWPS / ' rH 155 MONRgE PO BOX 4249 ENE 31405 1 AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 RENTON A 98056 FEDEFXAL AY WA 98003 SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE 31617 1IT AVE S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 r FW CHAMB R OF COMMERCE PO BOX 344 FEDERAL,VVAY,WA 98063 FEDERAL WAY DISPOSAL PO BOX 1817 AUBUR WA 98071 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE - LAURA MURPHY COMCAST BLE`_ STORE FISH ERIES'DJVISION TRIBAL ARCHAEOLOGIST 1414 S 324T S STE 211 ATTN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWER MUCEC ESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 39015 172N° AVE SE 39015 1l,72"° AVE SE AUBURN WA 98002 AUBQZiA 98092 EDWARDS/LYMAN/THOMAS PUYALLUP,, TRIBE OF INDIANS HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEPT 3009 E PORTLAND AVE TACOMA WA\�8404 PIERCE R OUNTY HEALTH DEPT 3629 S "D" , T TACOMA WA 98408 PLANNIN &71C❑ DEPT CITY OF A BURN 25 W MAI ZT AUBURN 11VA 98001 KENT CITY HALL PLANNING DEPT 220 4TH"AVE S }CENT YVA\98032 NE TAC NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL C/O JAMS 90LBURN TACOMA Ec.DNOMIC DEV 747 MARKET ST RM 900 TACOMA WA 98402-3793 CRAIG- IB.SON TACOMA 'PUBLIC UTILITIES PO BOX 1007 TACOMA WA 98411 PIERCE O PLNG & LAND SVCS RESOUR MANAGEMENT 2401 S 35TT TACOMA WA 98409-7460 PIERCE COUNTY BOUNDARY REV I E11V,8OARD 2401 S,35��ST TACOMA WA 98409 CITY CLER PACIFE%IR�AVE Y HALL 100 THSE PACIFI98047 CITY OF TACOMA BLUS LAND USE ADMINISTRATOR 747 MARKS T STE 345 TACOMA WA 48402-3769 MARION WEED CHAIR NORTHEAST TACOMA NEIGHBO HOOD COUNCIL 4735 N " 2"}d ST TACOMA WA 98422 CITY OF LAKEWOOD 10510 GRAVELLY LK DR SW LAKEW066 WA 98499-5013 f PIERCE CO PLNG & LAND SVCS DEVEL PMENT ENGINEER 2401 S 3 TH ST TACOMA WA 98409-7460 AUBU , SOOL DISTRICT 915 FOUR CHRTH NE AUBURN 98002 1 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ALGONA ITY'HALL 402 WARD ST ALGONA WA .98001-8505 JOE ELTR CH TACO A�WATER DIVISION PO B 1007 TACOMA WA 98411 HAYES ALEXANDER PLNG CHAIR NORTH TACOMA NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL 5308 Ejl©Gi' DR NE TACOMA WA 98422 CITY OFIMIL` 614 STE 206 1000 LAUREL ST MILTOA�98354 CITY OF `�EATAC CITY OF ❑ES MOINES CITYKAN RMANDY PARK 4800 S T6� ST 21630 -� S 801 H ST SEATAC WA 98188 DES MOINES A 98198 NORPARK WA 98166 CITY OF BURIEN TERRY LUKENS CITY OF FIFE CITY `HALLBELL VUE COUNCIL OFFICE 415 SW 50T" ST FIF WA S STE PO B X 90012 BURIEN 98166-1957 FIFE 98424 BELLE UE WA 98009-9012 WATER,\DISTRICT #54 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT MIDWAY SEWER DISTRICT 922 S 219T" ST PO BOX 3867 PO BO 3487 DES MOINES WA 98198-6392 KENT WA' "032-0367 KENT 1�VA�98032 WATER DISTRICT #111 COVINGTO WATER DISTRICT PAT PROUSE 27224 144�"' AVE SE 18631 SE,30 T" PL OWE TH KENT WAS' 99042-9058 KENT W , 98042-9208 1600: 7 AVE RM 1206 SEATTL WA 98121 LORI KITTRDGE MARX AUSBURN JILL GASTON REALTY SPEC MET ❑ TRANSIT PSE BPA- r 201C; j -CKSON ST 6905 S 228T" ST SKC-SVC 914 A f D" SEAiTL&WA 98104-3856 KENT WAL98032 SNOWO ISH WA 98290 r WASH E V1RflN COUNCIL CHRIS-CARREL LINDA SHAFFER ND FRIEND:DF THE HYLEBOS PIER E TRANSIT 615 2 AVE STE 380 PO BO� 4971 P❑ B❑ '99070 SEATTLE W 98104-2245 FEDERAL\WAY WA 98093 LAKEW OD WA 98499-0070 r / SAM PACT LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS FW CO�NITY COUNCIL SEA/KING`CO ASSOC/REALTORS OF SO TH KING COUNTY TH PO BOX 4 4 29839 t AVE SE PO BOX k6037 KENT WA 8042-4557 BURIN 98166 FEDERAL WAY WA 98063 CPICHAEL FELDMAN WASH T TE OCD / ATTN -NEWSROOM VIATION PLANNING SEATAC TACOM NEWS TRIBUNE 901 COL MBIA ST SW O BOX 68727 OLYMPkP,�11A 98504-8300 1950 S ST TEST SEATTLE WA 98168-0727 TACOMA WA 98405 LISA PEMBERTON-BUTLER SEAT LE PI FEDERAL WAY NEWS SEATTLE�TTINIES NORTH r 101 E10TT AVE W 1200 112T� VE NE STE C145 14006 AVE S STE B SEAT WA 98121 BELLEVU,E WA 98004-3748 BURIEN WA 98168 FEDERAL' A' MIRROR SOUTHUNTY JOURNAL OR KPOST 1414 S 324 T STE B-210 PO BOX,1 0 FEDERAL A WA 98003 KENT}I�IA 98035-0130 28815% CIFIC HWY S STE 4B FEDERZ&lAY WA 98003 r i LIAMSON I KING"C UNTY ASSESSORS OLYM� CHOLLYWIPELINE CO CITY OF EDGEWOOD 500 4 . AVE RM 700 2221 MIDIAN AVE E SEA LE WA 98104 2319 LII& AVE SW EDGEWOOD WA 98371-1010 RENTS WA 98055 r CRESTVIEW SHORECLUB ASSN 4817 SW 310TH ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 NORTH LAKE COJMNTY CLUB 33228 38TH AVE S AUBURN WA 98001 STEEL LK R ZIDENTSASSN 2329 S 304, ST ' FEDERAL' WAY WA 98003 BELLACARIN'O WOODS HOA 35204 6TH AVE SW FEDERAL W�Y WA 98023 TWIN LAKES HOA 3420 SW 320TH ST # 28 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 KEN SHATOCKI/ GROUSE POINTE HOA 1911 SW CAMPUS DR # 621 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 MASTER BUILDERS ASSOC 335 116TH AVE SE BELLEVUE WA 98004-6407 MHACC MIRROR LK RESIDENTS ASSN C/O WILLIAM HICKS TH 29219 7T" PL S 525 SW 312 ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 WEST GRI EN CONDO ASSN REDONDO COMMUNITY CLUB 432 S 3217 PL PO BOX 5118 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 REDO( DO WA 98054 BARCLAY.PLACE HOA BELMOR PARK HOA 1034 SW 334T" ST 2101 S 324, ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 BELLRIDOE TOWNHOMES HOA CAMPUS GLEN HOA 1438 S 308-H LN 32806 6T.' PL S FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 FEDERAL WAY WA 98003 MAR CHER'I COMNTY CLUB BROOK�A.KE COMNTY CENTER PO BOX 25281 726 S 356T1 ST FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 FEDERAL WAY WA 98023 KINGSGROVE HOA COMCAS -- SE PUGET SOUND AR TH CONSTR CTION/ENG MANAGER 2613 S 379 PL 4020 AUBURN WAY N FEDERAL ]NAY WA 98003 AUBURN WA\98002 CHERYL.PARAS PSE CMTY�SERVICES DEPT 3130;S 38 \ST TACOMA WA 98409 Revised May 1, 2008 K:\Environmental ChecklistsWgency Mailing List.doc 40k CITY OF Federal Way FILL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 20th Avenue South Helistop Federal Way File #08-102818-00-SE NOTE: The purpose of this Final Staff Evaluation is to provide technical staff evaluation of the proposed action; supplement information contained in the environmental checklist and expanded studies; provide technical information unavailable to the applicant; and correct inaccurate information and recommend measures to the Responsible Official to mitigate identified environmental impacts. Technical reports and attachments referenced herein and in the environmental checklist may not be attached to all copies of this evaluation. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting the Department of Community Development Services, 33325 8`h Avenue South. PO Box 9718. Federal Way. WA 98063-9718. Phone: 253-835-2607 LIST OF TECHNICAL REPORTS The following specialized studies and plans were prepared and submitted by the applicant: • Noise Evaluation, prepared by Optimum Environment, dated June 9, 2008; • DEIS prepared for Christian Faith Center, 2003; ■ Application to FAA dated May 22, 2008, revised and resubmitted September 4, 2008; • Revised Site Location Plan, dated September 9, 2008. ATTACHMENTS • June 11, 2008, Environmental Checklist, prepared by applicant's agent. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: 20'h Avenue South Helistop Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, 923 Shaw Road, Puyallup, WA 98372 Owner: Christian Faith Center, 33645 20'h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Project Location: 33645 20`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Site Size: 24.53 acres Zoning: RM-3600 — 3,600 sq. ft. minimum lot size FWCP Designation: Multi -family @MAT& OF PROPOSED ACTION AND BACKGROUND Applicant submitted an application for Process IV approval, to develop a helicopter landing pad (heliport) within the already constructed parking lot on the south side of the existing chapel building at the Christian Faith Center complex located on 206' Avenue South and south of 336a' Street. The City of Federal Way, through an interpretation of use effective December 1, 2007, requires that all heliport facilities go through a Process IV land use analysis for approval. As part of that approval, certain criteria and conditions must be met. One of those conditions requires the applicant to apply and obtain approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to use the site as a heliport. The FAA denied approval of the location behind the existing building, citing that it was a safety concern because it was too close to the building, close to single-family residences, close to tall power poles and trees, and did not have a means to block access to the area since it was in a constructed parking area. The applicant has since met with the FAA and found a location in a vacant, grassy field that was more suitable for a landing site and was also closer to the Interstate 5 corridor, which is the main travel corridor for the north and south movement of the helicopter. A 67 ft. by 67 ft. area will be marked in the grassy field where the helicopter can land. No additional clearing is being proposed. Also, during the initial review of the application, South King Fire and Rescue identified that by definition, a "heliport" allowed permanent structures that could either dispense or store fueling materials on site. However, a "helistop" was defined as a landing area that did not have permanent structures or fueling capabilities. SincQ the applicant did not intend to have a fueling station at this location, and would be used on an intermittent basis, the project was renamed to "helistop." STAFF EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Following are staff responses to the elements of the environmental checklist (enclosed) indicating whether or not City staff concurs with the applicant's response to the checklist item, or staff clarification or amendment of the response. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name has been changed to "20"' Avenue South Helistop" 2-5. Concur with the checklist. 6. Timeline of review was extended because of need to relocate landing site because of FAA disapproval of original location. 7-9. Concur with the checklist. 10. Approval of landing site from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is a condition necessary to obtain Federal Way Process IV approval. 11. The "Helistop" landing site has been relocated to vacant field on northeast side of property, just north of area designated for future development of a private school and further away from any adjacent residences. 12. Concur with the checklist, except site has been moved to adjacent Parcel #212104-9003. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a-h. Concur with the checklist. Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 20`h Avenue South Helistop Page 2 File #08-102818-00-SE/noo. I.D. 47445 2. Air a-c. Landing site relocated to a vacant, grassy field. No additional construction being proposed. 3. Water a.(1) The site contains three wetlands and two seasonal streams located on the northwest side and the northeast side of the parcel. The revised landing site will be within 50 ft. of a 100 ft. buffer of a wetland area containing a seasonal stream. Previous development on the parcel required that a split -rail fence with signage be installed along the perimeter of the 100 ft. buffer. Staffs site visit identified that the split -rail fence is in place and the wetland signage has been placed along the length of the buffer area. The vegetation in the wetland buffer area is moderately dense, so it would be difficult for any aircraft to land in the buffer or wetland area. It is not anticipated that intrusion into the wetland and/or buffer will take place with the landing of the helicopter in the adjacent field. a. (2) No additional work will take place within the identified wetland/stream/buffer area. The landing area is located outside of the 100 ft. wetland buffer area, but within 200 ft. of the wetland and seasonal stream. a. (3-6)Concur with the checklist. b.-c. Concur with the checklist. 4. Plants a. The landing area has been moved to vacant, grassy field. The only other vegetation is within the wetland buffer area, which is about 50 ft. away and separated from the landing area by a split -rail fence. b.-d. Concur with the checklist. 5. Animals a. The relocated landing site is on a parcel that contains both a wetland and a seasonal stream. There could be some fish located in the stream, but the EIS stated that this area had not historically been used by migrating fish, but could be present further south in the Hylebos watershed system. The helistop is not expected to adversely impact fish populations. b.-d. Concur with the checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a-c. Concur with the checklist. 7. Environmental Health a.(1) In the case of a crash, emergency services would be needed at the helicopter landing area. This site is also being offered as a potential landing site as an auxiliary landing site to support to existing Emergency Services for the City. a.(2) Concur with the checklist. b. The applicant submitted a Noise Evaluation prepared by Optimum Environment in June 2008. The analysis identified the maximum noise levels allowed in: a) residential areas; b) commercial areas; and, c) industrial areas. Since this is a commercially developed property, the maximum noise level allowed is 60 dBA. The analysis also identifies ambient noise levels in the neighborhood generated by other uses, specifically from Interstate 5, Pacific Highway, and the fact that this area is under the fly zone of Sea-Tac airport. The average one -hour measurement was 56.8 dBA with the minimum being 53 dBA and the maximum being 67.3 dBA. The helicopter landing was measured at 72 dBA, Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist Page 3 20'bAvenue South Helistop File #08-102818-00-SE/Doc LD 47445 but was only audible for a short time, a matter of minutes. However, since the evaluation is measured on a one -hour basis, the temporary noise increase for landing and take off of the helicopter did not raise the one -hour measurement over the acceptable level of 60 dBA. The landing site has now been relocated to an open field, further away from any residences. The noise will be heard by residents along 336`b Street, but there will be no direct flyovers of any residences- surrounding the Christian Faith Center property. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a-k. Concur with the checklist. 9. Housing a-c. Concur with the checklist. 10. Aesthetics a-c. Concur with the checklist. 11. Light and Glare a-d. Concur with the checklist. 12. Recreation a-c. Concur with the checklist. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a-c. Concur with the checklist. 14. Transportation a. With the relocation of the helistop landing area, the helicopter will be flying north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor and then heading directly west from the corridor, across the wetland area to the landing site in the vacant field. The helicopter will no longer need to fly over any of the residences in the neighborhood. b.-g. Concur with the checklist. 15. Public Services a-b. Concur with the checklist. 16. Utilities a-b. Concur with the checklist. CONCLUSION The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposed non -project action does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment and an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.032(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. The information is available to the public upon request. The City reserves the right to review any future revisions or alterations to the site or the proposal in order to determine the environmental significance or nonsignificance of the project at that point in time. Prepared By: Joanne Long -Woods, AICP, Senior Planner Date: October 23, 2008 Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist 201" Avenue South Helistop Page 4 File #08-102818-00-SE/noe I n 47445 41k CITY Federalof Way ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 201h Avenue South Helistop File No: 08-102818-00-SE Description: Master plan approval to construct a private helistop landing site as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center for air taxi pick up and drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned "RM-3600" and designated as "Multi - Family" in the Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC Attn: Matt Cyr PO Box 1224 Puyallup, WA 98372 Location: 33645 20th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA, in the NE 'A Sec. 21, T21N, R4E, W.M., Tax Parcels: #2121049003 and #2121049004. Lead Agency: City of Federal Way Staff Contact: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, 253-835-2640 The Responsible Official of the City of Federal Way hereby makes the following decision on this proposed development based upon impacts identified in the environmental checklist; a Noise Evaluation, prepared by Optimum Environment, dated June 9, 2008; a DEISfor the Christian Faith Center, dated 2003; the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; Federal Way City Code; and other municipal policies, plans, rules, and regulations designated as a basis for exercise of substantive authority under the State Environmental Policy Act Rules pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 43.31C.060. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Further information regarding this action is available to the public upon request at the Department of Community Development Services. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposal is for Master Plan approval (Process IV approval) to locate a helistop landing area on the site of the Christian Faith Center church facility. The original application requested approval to lmate a heliport south of the church building, in an existing parking lot. However, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would not approve the application for the location, citing that it was not a safe location because it was too close to adjacent residents' houses and too close to the existing building. Also, South King Fire and Rescue would not approve the location of a "heliport" because by definition, a heliport is a permanent landing area with structures that may store flammable fluids. However, a "helistop" is just a landing area that does not have any permanent structures and is used for landing and take off only. The applicant was then required to relocate the landing area and has requested approval of a helistop rather than a heliport. 2. The revised site plan shows that the proposed helistop has been relocated to a vacant, grassy field on the northeast side of Parcel #2121049003, just north of where a pad has been prepared for a new private school, which is proposed to be built within 2-3 years. No additional clearing or grading is being proposed at this location. 3. The site for the helistop is on one of two parcels at the Christian Faith Center in an area zoned RM- 3600, requiring a minimum lot size of 3,600 sq. ft. The Comprehensive Plan designation in this area is Multi -Family Residential. Churches and accessory uses are permitted. 4. The "Final Staff Evaluation for Environmental Checklist, File No. 08-102818-00-SE" is hereby incorporated by reference as though set forth in full. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Federal Way's Comprehensive Plan Policies adopted by Federal Way, and contained within the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), serve as a basis for the exercise of substantive SEPA authority to approve, condition, or deny proposed actions applicable to potential adverse environmental impacts resulting from this project. The following components of the FWCP support the conditions for the development. TG8: a. Support the area's economy by assuring residents and area employers access to a full range of travel modes, including intercity airport facilities, while maintaining the quality of life reflected in the plan vision. b. Provide guided opportunities for the improvement of heliport facilities and services in and around the City. SEPA DETERNIINATION Based on the above policies and analysis, and given the fact that the applicant has relocated the helistop landing in conjunction with the recommendation of the Federal Aviation Administration, a determination of nonsignificance is being issued for this project. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on November 10, 2008. Unless modified by the City, this determination will become final following the above comment deadline. Any person aggrieved of the City's final determination may file an appeal with the City within 14 days of Determination ofNonsignificance (DNS) Page 2 201h Avenue South Helistop File No: 08-102818-00-SE/nog I n 47442 the above comment deadline. You may appeal this determination to the City of Federal Way, no later than 5:00 p.m. on November 24, 2008, by a letter stating the reason for the appeal of the determination. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Responsible Official: Greg Fewins Position/Title: Director of Community Development Services Address: 33325 8d Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 f Date Issued: October 25, 2008 Signature: , _ Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) 2is" Avenue South Helistop Page 3 File No: 08-102818-00-SE/Do..1 D 47442 loth Avenue South Helistop Vicinity Map - -- S 333 ST Ic' I I S 354 LN � II CO ,I S 340 ST 'Ir N r ry S 333 ST l ; N r_ AW eT hco -A CITY OF Federal Way File 08-102818-00-SE Propsed Master Plan approval to locat, private helistop landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet loth Avenue South Helistop Vicinity Map S 333 ST I N J °r° S 354 LIB cn 7 S 336 ST - - IS 340 ST G> I f -.S 341 ST V� S 341 ST —3 - d oo S 344 ST S 333 ST J ry S 336 ST C�- M CO3 'ok CITY OF Federal Way File 08-102818-00-SE Propsed Master Plan approval to locate a private helistop landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet I RE"EIR' EDOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8h Avenue South JUN 112008 PO Box 9718 CITY OF Federal Way WA 98063-9718 2609 Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 253-835-2607; Fax 2 eralwa .com c www.citvoffederalway.com C®S ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 43.21C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the'agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about our proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROJECT PROPOSALS Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for Non -Project Actions. For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer;" and "affected geographic area," respectively. Bulletin #050 — December 22, 2005 Page 1 of 18 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT A. BACKGROUND. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 200 Avenue South Heliport 2. Name of Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Owners: Christian Faith Center 3364520`h Ave. S. Federal Way, WA 98003 Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC PO Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98372 (253) 435 3699 Attn: Mr. Matt Cyr Agent: Abbey Road Group, LLC PO Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98372 (253) 435 3699 Contact. • Mr. Matt Cyr 4. Date checklist prepared: June 9, 2008 EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services 6. Proposed project timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Upon application being deemed complete: Checklist Review. 1 month Land Use Review/Hearing: 3months 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at this time. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. - Noise Study by Optimum Environment, dated June 6, 2008 - Christian Faith Center Draft EIS, dated November 2003. 9. Do you know of pending applications for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None are known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposals, if known. - SEPA Review - Hearing Examiners Approval 11. Give a complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in the checklist which ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. h-Z U 5 FV t' r}�' �tl� ►s� y �' This project is proposing to permit the use of a private helipmt site on the -*eater side of the Christian Faith Center. The site is approximately 24.53 acres and has a zoning designation h of RM-3600. There is one existing building on the site and associated parking lot and ' &k landscaping that will remain. During the recent development of the site, an area of the say � parking lot sout#-of-the-building was prepared for a future private heliport to serve as an � air taxi pickup and drop off location. The proposal is to permit the heliport as an approved use in accordance with Federal Way City Code and the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. Site development, besides striping the heliport if required, is not anticipated with this proposal. 12. Location of the proposal. Please give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your project, including street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, please provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Please provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if possible. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to the checklist. (Indicate if maps or plans have been submitted as part of a permit application). b The proposed private heliport is located in the City of Federal Way and known as king -County taxparcels: 212104-9004. The project is more specifically located south of 2et64��'� �! Avenue South and South 336`h Street. The project is within a portion of the Northwest % of Section 21, Township 21, Range 04, of the Willamette Meridian. The site address is 336452iP Avenue South. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS. 1. Earth. a. General description of the site (underline one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of slope): The steepest slope on the site is approximately 32 percent with the majority of the site developed with a gradual slope to the west and east. c. What general types of soil are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, please specify and note any prime farmland. The site consists ofAIdea vood gravelly sand loam with a smaller unit of Tukwila muck near the northwest corner per the King County Soil Survey Maps dated 1973. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no known surface indications of unstable soils on, or in the immediate vicinity of the proposed site location. e. Describe the purposes, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None proposed at this time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? There is no change to impervious surface with this proposal h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: None proposed at this time. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2. AIR. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction, and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Because the site has been previously constructed, there are no construction emissions anticipated with this proposal. Once the private helipert-use is approved, then emissions from a helicopter, similar to an automobile, will occur approximately once a week. The rotor wash of the helicopter could also stir up Tln{mal amount of dust in -the -paved parking -lot• r z:. ti b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor which may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None to our knowledge. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts, if any: Potential-dust-emissionsfrom-the-rotor -wash-will-be- controlled -by. tbe-malnt,5nancv-of-the-aspha&-parking�lot- There are no measures proposed for the helicopter emissions at this time, but it is anticipated that once a week occurrence is likely to have minimal impact. 3. WATER. a. Surface: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 1) Is there any surface water on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, associated wetland)? If yes, describe type, provide names, and, if known, state what stream or river it flows into. ,� ► LlJ�� t The site contains three wetlands and two seasonal streams located �, 1.'It t on the site. The proposed private heliport site is located within -the A46 develop�.,&aclslag---lot area -south -of the-existing-abuildingand mat -within the -immediate vicinity of any surface water that has not -3�' t i�uk ,ati previously been mitigated for during the Christian Faith Center development. Please see the Christian Faith Center DEIS for more yeti information. �[ TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY 2) Will the project require any work over or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and r attach available plans. , f`�. - - ,� '04 hullF IL No work is proposed with this project: Naoa Fdjg`e-c 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate source of fill materials. None proposed. 4) Will surface water withdrawals or diversions be required by the proposal? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? Note location on the site plan, if any. No. A 100 year floodplain was not been mapped for these branches of the Hylebos Creek. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. NotApplicable. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn or recharged? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. M 2) Describe waste water material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff and storm water and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will the water flow into other waters? If so, please describe. The primary source of runoff is stormwater. A north south trending ridge divides the site into two drainage subbasins within the Hylebos Creek Basin. Runoff from impervious areas is collected by catch basins and routed through a pipeconveyance system to the combined wetpond/detention ponds or the stormwater wetland pond previously constructed, The existing ponds discharge runoff to the natural discharge location, the wetland buffer areas long the west and east property line, Please see the Christian Faith Center Grading and Utility Sheets by CES NW, Inc for more information. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials are generally limited to petroleum products from the road surfaces The water quality portion of the stormwater facilities is specifically designed to prohibit these materials from entering the downstream system, d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: There is no change to surface, ground, and runoff water associated with this project. Therefore no measures to reduce or control impacts are proposed at this time. 4. PLANTS. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: xx deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other fruit, oak xx evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: xx shrubs: x\ gra55 s pas u�re crop or grain xx wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other xx water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None, to our knowledge. c. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on near the site. None, to our knowledge. d. List proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None is proposed at this time. 5. ANIMALS. a. Circle (underline) any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to ,be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: rodents Fish: bass, salmon, trout, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None, to our knowledge. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Not to our knowledge. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None are proposed at this time. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES. a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None, to our knowledge. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. M, c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List any other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None proposed at this time, 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, exposure to toxic chemicals, including risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1. Describe Special Emergency services that might be required. Not applicable. 2. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are proposed at this time. b. Noise. 1. What type of noise exists in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The the project is adjacent to Interstate 5, Pacific Highway South, commercial businesses, three existing heliport sites, and within the SeaTac International Airport flight path. All these existing conditions produce a constant background noise. A noise survey of the site the Leg for the site was 56.8 dBA with an Lmax of 67.3 and an Lmin of 53 dBA. Please see the Noise Evaluation prepared by Optimum Environment dated June 6, 2008 for more information. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2. What types of levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The site has been previously constructed so construction noises are un ikely to occur. On a long-term basis, noise would be limited to a helicopter landing and takeoff approximately once per week on Sunday between 9:00 a.m, and 5.•00 p.m, and religious holidays. According the Noise Evaluation the noise level would increase for a 30 second period from approximately 55 dBA to approximately 72 dBA. Please see the Noise Evaluation prepared by Optimum Environment dated June 6, 2008 for more information. 3. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: According to the Noise Evaluation the Leq, of the site with the helicopter landing would only increase from 56.7 dBA to 57.8 dBA. This increase is still below noise limitations adopted by the City of Federal Way which is 60 dBA. Therefore, no measures to reduce or control noise impacts are proposed at this time. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE. a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY The site is currently used as a church/school with associated uses. The bordered uses on the North, East, South and West are as follows: o North: Existing single-family. Zoned Multi -Family (RM 3600). o East. 15 and existing Weyerhaeuser corporate building and three heliports Zoned Corporate Park (CP-I). o South: Existing business park and single-family residential. Zoned Commercial Enterprise (CE). o West. Hwy 99 and existing businesses Zoned Community Business (BC). b. Has the site been used for agricultural purposes? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is one building on the site associated with this project with a footprint of approximately 170,091 sf. The building has associated parking surrounding the building. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning of the site? The current zoning is multi -family residential RM-3600 (1 units per 3600 square feet). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation is Multi Family Residenbal. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program environment designation of the site? Not applicable- h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes Please see the Christian Faith Center Draft EIS dated November 2003 for more information. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable to this project. j. Proposed measures to reduce displacement impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. k. What are the proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed private heliport is consistent with the three heliports located on the opposite site Interstate 5, adjacent to the site. The proposed location is also within the City; comprehensive plan designation of areas most compatible for heliport development and will be compliant with the City Code. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 9. HOUSING. a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None eliminated. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 10. AESTHETICS. a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s) not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No buildings are proposed with this project. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any? None are proposed at this time. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None, the private heliport is proposed for daytime use. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your project? None. d. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 12. RECREATION. a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY On site = There is an existing sports and recreation field located on site associated with the Christian Faith Center. North = Steel Lake Park East = Rhododendron Botanical Garden; Pacific Rim Bonsai Collection South = Enchanted Parks West = Wondenvood Park b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. IAYn c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None are proposed at this time. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION. a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on the site. None are known. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What are the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 14. TRANSPORTATION. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any: The Christian Faith Center has access to 336th Street via 20th Avenue South and via a driveway to 336th Street. The project also has access via a driveway to SR-99. Multiple accesses are available to 20th A venue South. Road access to the private heliport will be via 2dh Avenue South and air access to the heliport will be via the east to and from the Interstate 5 flight corridor. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, the nearest public bus access is on Highway 99 which is adjacent to site (bus routes 182, 402, 500, and 501). c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The proposed site of the private heliport was previously designed as a heliport so no parking spaces will be eliminated and no automotive parking spaces will be gained. Because this site will serve as an air taxi pick up and drop off location, no helicopters will park at the site for a prolonged period of time. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or street, or improvements to any existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None proposed. Will the project use or occur in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes, the proposal will provide air transport to and from the site. Three heliports for air transport currently exist to the east of the site, opposite Interstate 5. EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. No additional vehicular trips are proposed in association with the private heliport project: Approximately one air trip per week is proposed with this project which will reduce vehicular trips by approximately one per week. g. What are proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None are proposed at this time. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Not to our knowledge. b. What are proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None are proposed at this time. 17. UTILITIES. a. Circle (underline) utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: cable television. b. Describe the utilities which are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: Puget Sound Energy Gas: Puget Sound Energy Water: Lakehaven Utility District Refuse: RST Disposal Telephone: Qwest Communications Sewer: Lakehaven Utility District Cable: AT&T Broadband EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT The site was previously constructed with the Christian Faith Center development. No utilities are proposed for the private heliport use at this time. C. SIGNATURE. The above answers are true to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. 4 Agent for the Applicant: Date Submitted: EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY Joanne Long -Woods From: garysvet@comcast.net Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 2:27 PM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop No - I could not make the meeting because they held it during the day when I had to work instead of an evening. Not sure I understand the rationale behind the scheduling. I wanted to submit comments for the Homeowners Ass'n but one of the homeowners threatened me if I did (obviously he was a church member but not much of a Christian). For one individual to submit comments would have little (if any) impact on the decision because, as I see it, it is pretty much a "done deal". Gary Robertson ----- Original Message From: Joanne Long -Woods To: 'garysvet@comcast.net' Sent: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Gary: Sorry to take so long getting back to you. I am the only planner here right now and barely made it in myself with the roads the way they were. The "75 ft." was the measurement from the back parking area behind the chapel building to the nearest residence. The new location is further away from any residences, and about 400 ft. from nearest building to north, or on other side of 336th. Did you make it to the public hearing? I only remember a few neighbors showing up to testify. Plus, there were 6 people who submitted comments in writing to the Hearing Examiner during the comment period. Joanne Long -Woods From: garysvet@comcast.net Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 2:37 PM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: RE: Your Ur 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Please mail me a copy so our Board of Directors can be advised. My address is 2100 S. 336th St. #G-1, Federal Way, WA 98003-8967. Thanks. Gary Robertson Original Message From: Joanne Long -Woods To: 'garysvet@comcast.net' Sent: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop I can at least send you a copy of the Hearing Examiners decision when it comes in if you ask me to. We expect it by the end of next week. Stay safe! Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods From: garysvet@comcast.net Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:55 AM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: CFC Helipad Suggest you read Pat Gee's article from Saturday's Federal Way Mirror. A very well written letter that "hits the nail on the head". It is at their website \ v w.fedwayinirror.com and click on "Letters". Gary Robertson Original Message From: Joanne Long -Woods To: 'garysvet@comcast.net' Sent: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Gary: It was actually on the south center side, just outside the back door of the chapel building and only 75 ft. from those residencies and power lines. Although the new landing site is closer to your residence, it is in an open field and still over 350 ft. from the townhomes across 336th. The FAA decided that was a safer landing area than originally proposed. This has already gone to hearing and the Examiner's decision may come out next week. Will keep you posted. Joanne Long -Woods Joanne Long -Woods From: Joanne Long -Woods Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 1:34 PM To: 'garysvet@comcast. net' Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Attachments: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Gary: Sorry to take so long getting back to you. I am the only planner here right now and barely made it in myself with the roads the way they were. The "75 ft." was the measurement from the back parking area behind the chapel building to the nearest residence. The new location is further away from any residences, and about 400 ft. from nearest building to north, or on other side of 336th. Did you make it to the public hearing? I only remember a few neighbors showing up to testify. Plus, there were 6 people who submitted comments in writing to the Hearing Examiner during the comment period. Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods From: garysvet@comcast.net Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:36 AM To: Joanne Long -Woods Cc: FLBD/Dennesha McCurry/Pres. Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Joanne: I really don't understand why they didn't pick a site in the SE end of their land where it would be as far away from the power lines and residences as possible so they could address the issue of safety which you would think would be their #1 concern.. You said 75 feet from residences" - what were you referring to? Was it the Garden Court Condos? I think the hearing was a complete waste of time - just like the original hearing was - because just like before, CFC will always get what they want and the concerns of homeowners will be ignored by the city (i.e. SOP). It is like "David (homeowners) going up against Goliath (CFC) and it is basically "no contest". Gary Robertson A Frustrated Homeowner Original Message From: Joanne Long -Woods To: 'garysvet@comcast.net' Sent: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Gary: It was actually on the south center side, just outside the back door of the chapel building and only 75 ft. from those residencies and power lines. Although the new landing site is closer to your residence, it is in an open field and still over 350 ft. from the townhomes across 336th. The FAA decided that was a safer landing area than originally proposed. This has already gone to hearing and the Examiner's decision may come out next week. Will keep you posted. Joanne Long -Woods From: garysvet@comcast.net Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:08 AM To: Joanne Long -Woods Cc: FLBD/Dennesha McCurry/Pres. Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Joanne Correct me if I am wrong - but wasn't the original proposed Heliport site on the SE side of the property? If that is true, why in the world would the FAA insist on their moving it to the NE side of the property which is just across the street from our property? If they were really concerned about the issue of "safety", wouldn't it make more sense to keep the site as far away from residential property as possible? Gary Robertson Forest Lane Townhomes 2100 S. 336th St. #G-1 Original Message From: Joanne Long -Woods To: 'garysvet@comcast.net' Sent: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop What comment period are you referring to? The comment period for the SEPA determination was listed on the published determination, a copy of which was included with the letter. The letter I sent was an informative letter only. You still have an opportunity to submit your comments in writing to the Hearing Examiner up until the hearing on December 1 Oth. Or, you can present your comments in person at the hearing. Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods From: Joanne Long -Woods Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 7:53 AM To: 'garysvet@comcast.net' Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Attachments: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop What comment period are you referring to? The comment period for the SEPA determination was listed on the published determination, a copy of which was included with the letter. The letter I sent was an informative letter only. You still have an opportunity to submit your comments in writing to the Hearing Examiner up until the hearing on December 10th. Or, you can present your comments in person at the hearing. Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner 253-835-2640 Joanne Lon -Woods From: garysvet@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:15 PM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Maybe I missed it - but I did not see the comment period listed and is why I emailed you. Perhaps you should have made it more obvious by putting it at the top of the letter in BOLD letters so it wouldn't be overlooked. Gary Robertson Original Message From: Joanne Long -Woods To: 'garysvet@comcast.net' Sent: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Mr. Robertson: The comment period was listed on the SEPA determination that should have been sent with the letter. The 14-day comment period that ended on November 10, 2008. The public hearing for this case has been scheduled for Dec. 10, 2008, on or about 2:00 p.m. We will be sending you a notice of that hearing shortly. you can submit comments in writing to me before the hearing date, or attend the public hearing and submit your comments before the Hearing Examiner. Joanne Long -Woods From: garysvet@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:13 PM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Dennesha: Here is the info on the CFC hearing for a helicopter landing spot which - because of FAA concerns- they moved CLOSER to our property which is NOT a good thing. Gary Original Message From: Joanne Long -Woods To: 'garysvet@comcast.net' Sent: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: RE: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Mr. Robertson: The comment period was listed on the SEPA determination that should have been sent with the letter. The 14-day comment period that ended on November 10, 2008. The public hearing for this case has been scheduled for Dec. 10, 2008, on or about 2:00 p.m. We will be sending you a notice of that hearing shortly. you can submit comments in writing to me before the hearing date, or attend the public hearing and submit your comments before the Hearing Examiner. Joanne Long -Woods From: garysvet@comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 9:02 AM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: Your Ltr 10/24/08 - CFC Helistop Joanne: I am a homeowner and Secretary/Treasurer/Board Member for Forest Lane Townhomes located directly across (north) from CFC. Your letter was unclear - when is the public comment period? II don't see how the move addresses the FAA concern as the new site is actually CLOSER to our property - so how does that improve the safety concerns of our residents should the helicopter experience a mechanical failure as it approached the landing site? The other question is what impact (positive or negative) will this helistop have on our property values? Gary Robertson Unit G-1 Forest Lane Townhomes CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER HELISTOP MANAGEMENT AND LANDING/TAKEOFF PROCEDURES Helistop: An area of land or water or a structural surface that is used, or intended for use, for the landing and takeoff of helicopters and any appurtenant areas which are used, or intended for use, for heliport buildings and other heliport facilities, except that no fueling, defueling, maintenance, repairs, or storage of helicopters is permitted (2006 International Fire Code). Use: Private daytime use only. Location: 20th Avenue South, Federal Way Washington Latitude: 47° 17'58.1" Longitude:-122*18'19.9" Elevation: 363 NGVD Dimensions: Touchdown and Lift -Off Area (TLOF): 35.0 feet by 35.0 feet Final Approach and Take -Off (FATO): 64.0 feet by 64.0 feet Safety Area: 124.0 feet by 124.0 feet Weight Limit: Not Applicable Maintenance of Area: The helistop will be maintained to FAA standards at all times. This will be keeping the grass mowed. Markings of the helistop are not required by the FAA because of the areas size and the trees in the area are sufficient to gauge the wind according to the FAA. Parking lot cones and eye protection to be used for landing and takeoff will be kept in the maintenance garage in the rear of the Christian Faith Center building where transport to the helistop will be located. Training of Parking Attendants and Ushers: The head of security is responsible for the training and coordination of the helistop. Head parking attendants and ushers will receive directions from the head of security and will be responsible for delegating tasks associated with helicopter landing and takeoff. Once per year the head of security, in association with the contracted helicopter taxi service, will conduct a training of parking lot attendants and ushers to address helicopter landing and takeoff procedures. Landing and Takeoff Procedures: The Christian Faith Center uses a helicopter taxi service for helicopter transport and schedules all helicopter transport in advance. Helicopter transport is currently only proposed for intermittent Sunday mornings to transport staff to or from the helistop. Parking attendants and ushers will be notified the morning of the service if a landing and takeoff will occur. Landings and takeoffs will be scheduled during the service, after the message, to reduce pedestrian and automobile interference. The following is a list of tasks to be completed for safe helicopter landing and takeoff at the helistop: Approximately 30 minutes before the helicopter is scheduled to land the helistop, the parking attendants will place cones to block off the parking lot area south of the helistop. The cones are located in the maintenance garage adjacent to the helistop. At this time parking attendants will observe the weather conditions at the helistop and observe to see if any foreign objects are present that could pose a hazard to the helicopter. If inclement weather conditions are present or foreign objects are observed, the head parking attendant and head of security must be notified immediately. The head of RESUBMITTED DEC 1 0 2008 CJ B�LD BUILDING DEPT. AY security will have the ability to contact the helicopter pilot and has the authority to cancel a landing at any time. 2. Approximately 15 minutes before the helicopter is scheduled to land parking attendants will be present in the parking lot area south of the helistop to direct pedestrian and automotive traffic away from the helistop. Ushers will be present at the buildings adjacent doors to notify pedestrian traffic to stay away from the helistop. Parking attendants should put on eye protection at this time and should continue to observe weather and foreign objects around the heliport and report any unsafe conditions to the head parking attendant and head of security. The parking attendants should also watch and listen for the helicopter. 3. When the helicopter arrives it will hover over the heliport and land within the field at the approximate location of the TLOF. Parking attendants and ushers should continue to keep pedestrian and automobile traffic directed away from the helistop at this time. 4. Once the helicopter has safely landed, the parking attendants and ushers should continue to direct pedestrian and automobile traffic way from the helistop. No one should approach the helicopter at this time unless instructed to. The head of security or head usher will then be responsible for escorting staff from within the building to the helicopter for loading or passengers from the helicopter to the building. 5. Once passengers have been loaded or offloaded and the safety area (grass field) cleared, the helicopter will then accelerate and takeoff. When the helicopter is beyond visual distance, the parking attendants will return the cones and eye protection to the maintenance garage. Ushers and parking attendants can then allow pedestrian and automobile traffic back into the area of the helistop. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY persons who submit written or oral comments to NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Hearing Examinees decision. The applicafton is to be re- 20th Avenue South Helistop viewed under all applicable codes, regulations, Federal Way File #08-102817-00-UP and policies of the City of Federal Way. Notice Is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hear- ing at or about 2:00 p.m. on December 10.2008, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 8th Avenue South, Federal Way. WA) for the fol- lowing project. Name: 20th Avenue South Hell - stop The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Commu- nity Development Services (33325 8th Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way. WA 98063- 9718). The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be avallable .for review one week before the nearing. Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Joanne Long -Woods, Se- nior Planner, at 253-835-2640. Project Description: The application Is for Mas- FWM 1477 ter Plan approval to consrrucl a private helistop Date of Publication: November 26, 2008 landing area as an approved use at the Chris- tian Faith Center Church facility for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM-3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Project Location:. 33645 20th Avenue South. Federal Way, in the NE '1/4 of Sec. 21. T21 N, R4E, W.M., Tax Parcels: #2121049003;#2121042640. Application Received: June 11, 2008 Date Complete. July 29, 2008 Notice of Application:July 29, 2008 SEPA Determination: October 25, 2008, Existing Environmental Documents: Environ- mental Noise Evaluation, SEPA checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Review at This Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, °Environmental Policy' (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and De- velopment"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning' Consistency with Applicable City Plans, Regu- lations, and/or other applicable 5tateJFederal Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regu- lations including the FWCC: Federal Way Com- prehensive Plan; and, location approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering written comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hear- ing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the preliminary plat application within 10 work- ing days after the close of the hearing. Any person has the right to request a copy of the Hearing Examiner's decision, once made. Only FEDERAL WAY - R_ 6Vel A--.- I R R 0 A SOUND PUBLISfIING NEWSPAPIR Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way — Community Development Dept. L-1477 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 26th day of November, 2008 , and ending on the 26th day of November. 2008, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 152.85 . which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090. Subscribed to and sworn before me this 5th day of December, 2008. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON TERYL A. HELLER My Appointment Expires Sept. 04, 2012 1414 S. 324fh STRIP, SUIH B210, FMIRAL WAY, WA 98003 ■ 253-925-5565 ■ f A X: 253-925-5750 CITY OF Federal Way COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO THE FEDERAL WAY HEARING EXAMINER 20th Avenue South Helistop Federal Way File No. 08-102817-00-UP PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 10, 2008 City of Federal Way Council Chambers 33325 8m Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98063 Table of Contents I. Project Information ...................... ......................................................................................................2 II. Consulted Departments and Agencies...............................................................................................3 III. State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)............................................................................................3 IV. Natural Environment.....................................................................................:.............:......................4 V. Neighborhood Characteristics............................................................................................................4 VI. Transportation.................................................................................................................................. .5 VII. Public Services.................................................................................................................... ._..5 VIII. Utilities..............................................................................................................................................5 IX_ Analysis of Process IV Decisional Criteria........................................................................................5 X. Criteria for Approval of a Heliport .................................... ..................... ....:...... :............................... 7 XI. Findings of Fact.................................................................................................................................8 XII. Recommendations................................................................................................................._...._.......9 XIII. List of Exhibits.........................................•..............................................:........................................10 Report Prepared by: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner December 1, 2008 r-- ' ��. 08-102817-00-UP Owners: Christian Faith Center 33645 201h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Agent: Matt Cyr Abbey Road Group, LLC PO Box 1224 Puyallup, WA 98372 Action Requested: The applicant is seeking Process IV approval to locate a "helistop" landing area on site of an existing church facility, pursuant to Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article VII, "Process IV Review — Hearing Examiner's Decision" and "Heliport Interpretation," effective November 28, 2007. Relevant Dates: Process IV Application Filed: June 11, 2008 Application Determined Complete: July 29, 2008 Notice of Application Published: August 2, 2008 SEPA Issued: October 25, 2008 Staff Representative: Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, 253-835-2640 Staff Recommendation: Approval of the Process IV Application I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. Decision Requested— The Process IV application is subject to a public hearing by the Hearing Examiner. An analysis of the applicable decisional criteria, findings, and recommendations is provided under Sections X, XI, and XII of this report. B. Description of the Proposal — The applicant proposes to locate a 64 ft. by 64 ft. helicopter landing area, a "helistop," on the northeast side of the Christian Faith Center Church property. The "helistop" will be used for air taxi service for pick up and drop off of the pastor of the church approximately one to two times per week. C. Property Description — The subject site is a previously approved Master Plan area for the Christian Faith Center Church, which consists of two parcels totaling 47 acres, with frontage on South 336`h Street to the north, the Interstate 5 right-of-way to the east, 34V Place to the south, and properties fronting Pacific Highway to the west. Currently there is the church sanctuary and office buildings constructed on the site with associated parking and landscaping areas, two wetlands with associated buffers, and the rest of the site has been cleared, graded, and seeded with grass for future developments. The landing site is to be located in a grassy field just north of a future school building site and east of 20`h Avenue South; the main access into the property. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 2 204 Avenue South Helistop File No. 08-102817-00-UP/Doc 1 D 47976 D. Location —The "helistop" landing site will be located at 33645 20`h Avenue South, on the 47- acre Christian Faith Center Church facility property, south of 336`h Street and east of 20'h Avenue South, in the NW '/4 of Section 21, T21N, R4E, W.M. E. Assessor's Parcel Numbers — Parcel Nos. #2121049003 and #2121049004. F. Site Access — The landing area can be accessed by vehicle via 20'h Avenue South, and by the helicopter via the north/south Interstate 5 corridor and then directly west to the site. G. Land Use, Zoning, and Comprehensive Plan Designation DIRECTION ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Site RM-3600 MF — Multifamily North RM-3600 MF — Multifamily South CE CE — Commercial Enterprise East None None West BC BC- Community Business EXISTING LAND USE Church, Private School, Private College, Offices Townhomes, Condos, SFR Business Park, SFR Interstate - 5 ROW Small commercial business ll><, CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments, agencies, and individuals were advised of this application. A. Community Development Review Committee (CDRC), consisting of the Federal Way Community Development Services Planning and Building Divisions; Public Works Engineering and Traffic Divisions; South King Fire and Rescue; Lakehaven Utility District; and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). CDRC comments have been incorporated into this report where applicable. B. All property owners within 300 feet of the site were mailed notices of the application as required by the FWCC code for Process IV notification, as well as the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) as required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection." The site was also posted and notices published in the newspaper and on the City's official notice boards. Six comment letters were submitted in response to the August 2, 2008 "Notice of Application." The City responded to the parties that provided comments on the proposed project on October 25, 2008. III. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) A. The City of Federal Way issued an Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the proposed action on October 25, 2008. This determination was based on review of information in the project file, including the environmental checklist and staff evaluation of the checklist for the 20'h Avenue South "Helistop" and the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) that was submitted with the development of the Christian Faith Center Church resulting in the conclusion that the proposal would not result in probable significant adverse impacts on the environment. B. The comment period for the DNS concluded on November 10, 2008. Two comment letters were received in response to the environmental determination. The City replied to the comment Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 3 201h Avenue South Helistop File No. 08-102817-00-UP/Doc 1 D 47976 letters on November 16, 2008. The appeal period ended on November 24, 2008, with no appeals to the City's environmental decision. The environmental decision is incorporated as though set forth in full. IV. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT A. Soils — Alder -wood gravelly sandy loam with a smaller unit of Tukwila muck near the northwest corner per the King County Soil Survey Maps dated 1973. B. Topography, Slopes — The site of the proposed landing area is a flat grassy area that has been previously graded and seeded with the construction of the church sanctuary and parking lot areas. There is an area on the overall property with slopes in excess of 30%; however, that is on the west side of the 47 acres and this proposed use is located on the east side of the property. C. Vegetation — The landing area is a flat, grassy field located west of a wetland buffer area and north of a proposed future school site. There are trees, shrubs, and other vegetation located within the adjacent wetland and buffer area that is separated from the rest of the property by a split rail fence. D. Stormwater Runoff— The intermittent use of a small portion of a grassy field will not create any additional runoff as no change to impervious surfaces is being proposed. Storm drainage review was not required for the "helistop" landing area. E. Wildlife and Habitat — There may be habitat in the wetlands and associated buffers. The rest of the property has been cleared and graded for construction of the church facilities. The east side wetland area, Wetland B, contains a stream that is part of the East Branch of Hylebos Creek Subbasin. The EIS prepared for the property identified that small mammals, frogs, and birds could habitate in this wetland area. Other birds, small animals, and amphibians could potentially use this area for foraging, but there were no known threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the subject site. F. Noise — The property is adjacent to Interstate 5, Pacific Highway South, commercial businesses, existing heliport sites across the freeway, and is within the SeaTac International Airport flight path. All of these conditions create a constant background noise. The use of a helicopter to land will add to the level of noise in the area on an intermittent basis. A Noise Evaluation was conducted by Optimum Environment on both the first proposed location of the landing site and for the second landing location. The analysis identified that the new location, in -the grassy field, would have less impact on the noise levels due to the fact that it is closer to the Interstate 5 corridor, which would result in a much smaller increase in ambient noise levels. The first location the total dBA levels were 57.8, which included the background noise with the added noise from the helicopter. At the new location, the levels increased to 64.9, with the background noise increasing to 64.7 and the helicopter noise only increased the ambient noise by .2 dBA, for a total of 64.9. The required noise levels are 65 dBA. V. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS A. Vicinity — The property is situated in the central portion of the City in an already developed multi -family and single-family residential area. The site contains the church sanctuary and associated offices for Phase I of the proposed development of the Christian Faith Center. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 4 2V' Avenue South Helistop File No. 08-102817-00-UP/Doc I D 47976 Interstate 5 is on the east border of the property, and across the freeway is the Weyerhaeuser Corporate Park. Wetland A is on the west side of the property and adjacent to Pacific Highway. There are townhomes, condominiums, and single-family residences to the north, and single- family residential and a business park to the south. VI. TRANSPORTATION A. Street Improvements — Since the street improvements and infrastructure for the property were installed with the development of the Christian Faith Center church and office building, no additional improvements will be required for this development. B. Access— The landing site is located east of a parking lot adjacent to the main access to the church facility, 201h Avenue South. Access to the landing site by vehicle is provided by 20`h Avenue South; access to the landing site by the helicopter is required to be due east, via the Interstate 5 corridor. VII. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Fire Protection — South King Fire and Rescue stated that they could not approve a "heliport" since by definition, a heliport would allow construction of accessory structures and the storage of potentially flammable materials. A "helistop" by definition in the fire code allows air taxi service for take off and landing of helicopters, but no accessory structures are allowed. As long as the landing area remains as an intermittent "helistop," South King Fire and Rescue has no comments or requirements for the proposal. B. Lakehaven Utility District — indicates that water and sewer service were provided to the area with the construction of the new church building, and no additional services are required for the "helistop" project. VIII. UTILITIES A. Sewage Disposal — Sewage disposal infrastructure was installed with development of the church sanctuary building. No additional facilities will be required for this proposal. B. Water Supply — Water supply infrastructure was installed with the development of the church sanctuary building. No additional facilities will be required for this proposal. C. Drainage Facilities — Drainage facilities were reviewed, approved, and installed with the development of the church sanctuary building. No new impervious surface area is being proposed for the landing area. No additional facilities will be required for this proposal. IX. ANALYSIS OF PROCESS IV DECISIONAL CRITERIA The FWCC establishes review procedures and decisional criteria for deciding upon various types of land use applications. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-445, "Hearing Examiner's decision," the Hearing Examiner may approve of the proposed development only if the following decisional criteria are met. Decisional criteria and staff responses are provided below. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 5 20'h Avenue South Helistop File No_ 08-102817-00-UP/ooc 1, D. 47976 The project is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Staff Comment: The application is subject to the adopted Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP), which designates the property as Multi -Family. The approved use of the property as a church facility is permitted within RM 3600 and is consistent with the policies applicable to this land use as established in the FWCP. The proposed development of a private helicopter landing area, the "helistop," is referenced in Chapter 3, Section 7, "Aviation" of the FWCP. Chapter 3.7 outlines goals and policies to allow helicopters as an alternative mode of transportation within the City. Goal TG8 of that section states: a. Support the area's economy by assuring residents and area employers access to a full range of travel modes, including intercity airport facilities, while maintaining the quality of life reflected in the plan vision; and, b. Provide guided opportunities for the improvement of heliport facilities and services in and around the City. Policies TP79 and TP80 would also apply to this proposal. TP79: "Promote extension of fixed guide way facilities to the regional airport as an effective means of resolving congestion problems that affect City residents and businesses." TP80: "Finalize and adopt guidelines for short range, local area rotocraft facility installation and use. These will be designed to minimize noise and safety risks and recognizing the jurisdiction of the Federal Aviation Administration." The applicant was required to submit both a Noise Evaluation and FAA location approval for this proposal in order to meet minimum requirements for the Process IV approval. 2. The project is consistent with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan. Staff Comment: The proposed application is required to comply with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy;" Chapter 22, "Zoning;" and all other applicable codes and regulations, including the "Heliport Interpretation" as adopted November 28, 2007. As proposed, and with conditions as recommended by staff, the proposed development will comply with all provisions of the chapter. 3. The project is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Staff Comment: The proposed use of a helicopter landing site on a small area of an open grassy field on a 47-acre church site on an intermittent basis during church services, does not appear to adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare. The main impact would be the increase in ambient noise levels in the area generated by the helicopter. The FAA must approve the location of such facilities and the first location was too close to area residential development and the existing church building. Noise Evaluation has identified that since the proposed landing site will be adjacent to the Interstate 5 corridor, the noise impact will be less than the Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 6 20"' Avenue South Helistop File No. 08-102817-00-UP/Doc LD 47976 first proposed location. In addition, to meet conditions of approval for a heliport landing area listed in the "Heliport Interpretation," the helicopter is not allowed to fly over residential areas and will be required to use the Interstate 5 corridor to reach the landing area. South King Fire and Rescue, Lakehaven Utility District, City Public Works and Building Divisions had no comments or requirements for the location of this helistop. The Noise Evaluation submitted for the proposal has identified that the noise level at the site located in the grassy field, does not exceed the minimum standard of 65 dBA level required for residential areas. 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal. Staff Comment: There is no anticipated demand for additional use of streets and utilities in the area of the subject property. The landing site is in a grassy field that will be developed at sometime in the future as a private school facility. The landing site will be utilized at times when students are not present and during church services only. Vehicle access to the site will be via the main access to the property, 20`b Avenue South, and the parking area to the west of the landing site. 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. Staff Comment: Development of this site is required to comply with the provisions of FWCC Chapter 18, "Environmental Protection;" Chapter 22, "Zoning;" and all other applicable local and state development codes and regulations, including the "Heliport Interpretation." As proposed, and with the relocation and access of the "helistop" site as recommended by City staff and the Federal Aviation Association {FAA), the application complies with all applicable statutes, codes, and regulations. X. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF A HELIPORT A. Heliport Interpretation —Current City code does not explicitly regulate heliports. A Process II "Interpretation," File #07-106054-00-UP, was issued on November 28, 2007. Heliports are referred to in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, but there were no guidelines in the code on how to regulate such facilities. B. Review Process — The interpretation stated that Heliports shall be an allowable use in the City of Federal Way subject to obtaining Process IV, Hearing Examiner Approval, based on certain criteria and development requirements. C. Criteria for Approval —In addition to the criteria in FWCC Chapter 22, Article VII for hearing examiner consideration, additional criteria must be met. Some of those are: • identify the days and number of takeoffs and landings that will take place; • identify the hours of operation, when the landings will take place; • any auxiliary facilities; • the flight path shall have direct access to I-5, and shall not be located over any adjacent residentially zoned properties. Staff Report to the Federal Way Nearing Examiner Page 7 201h Avenue South Helistop File No. 08-102817-00-UP/nay i.n. 47976 The proposed helistop location is directly west of the I-5 corridor and will not fly over any residential areas. The proposal states that the site will be used only intermittently one to two times a week during church hours and will have no auxiliary facilities, which is why it was renamed a "helistop." D. Conditions of Approval —In addition to the criteria listed above, additional conditions are required to be met prior to the operation of the helistop: 1) applicant must have approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to use the site for take off and landing of a helicopter; 2) the surface of the landing site shall consist of a dust -free maintainable surface; and, 3) the operator shall maintain adequate liability insurance and the City of Federal Way shall be named as an additional insured party. XI. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on an analysis of the preliminary plat application, environmental record, and related decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services finds that: 1. The proposal is to establish a 64 ft. by 64 ft_ helicopter landing site, a "helistop," on an open grassy field that is located on the 47-acre property owned by and being developed by the Christian Faith Center. The helistop will be used for air taxi service by the church on an intermittent basis during church services to transport the pastor to another church facility. The actual landing area is within a 35 ft. by 35 ft. square and within a 124 ft. by 124 ft. safety zone. 2. The proposed helistop landing site lies within the RM-3600 /Multifamily zoning district. There are no regulations in the code for "heliport" or "helistops." However, the "Heliport Interpretation" issued November 28, 2007, allows heliports within the City through a Process IV approval, subject to certain criteria and conditions for the location and operation of a heliport. 3. The proposed helistop, as an alternative mode of transportation for an established church complex and business, is in compliance with the transportation and aviation goals of the City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 3, Section 7, "Aviation." 4. City staff received and responded to written comments received from six neighbors regarding potential impacts on the neighborhood by increased noise generated by the landing of a helicopter in their neighborhood with the issuance of the "Notice of Application." The comments were considered in the environmental determination for the project. 5. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for the proposed action on October 25, 2008, based on the Staff Evaluation of Environmental Checklist and review of other supporting documents, the Noise Evaluation submitted by Optimum Environment, and the application for a revised location as approved by the FAA. Two comment letters were received regarding the proposed development. No appeals of the environmental determination were filed with the City. 6. The proposal was reviewed and determined to be consistent with decisional criteria set forth in FWCC Section 22-445, including consistency with the comprehensive plan; consistency with all applicable provisions of the chapter, including those adopted by reference from the comprehensive plan; consistency with the public health, safety, and welfare; consistency with the requirement that streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 8 2Qa° Avenue South Helistap File No. 08-102817-00-UP/Doc I D 47976 the anticipated demand from the proposal; and consistency that the proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. Vehicular access to the helistop site will be available off of 20`h Avenue South via South 3361h Street. Access to the landing site by the helicopter is required to be from the Interstate 5 corridor and not over residential areas. Relocation of the proposed helistop to the open grassy field as proposed, will meet required conditions as outlined in the Heliport Interpretation of 2007. 8. Design and construction surface drainage facilities in accordance with the 1998 KCSWDM were installed with the construction of the church sanctuary building. No additional impervious surfaces will be generated by this proposal and further review is not required. 9. Water and sewer facilities are available from the Lakehaven Utility District; however, no additional utilities will be required for this proposal. 10. Pursuant to the FWCC and if approved by City Council, prior to final plat approval and recording, all required and approved improvements will be constructed, or the improvements appropriately bonded, per City code requirements. 11. When the building permits for the school construction project are submitted, the present location of the landing area may have to be addressed to identify if there are any location or scheduling conflicts between the two uses. XII. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on review of the applications, environmental record, and pertinent decisional criteria, the Department of Community Development Services recommends that the Hearing Examiner recommend approval of the application, subject to the following conditions: 1, Prior to the City's final approval of the Process IV application, the applicant shall verify that the safety zone and landing area are outside of the buffer area of Wetland B on the property. If either area is within or touches the buffer area, the landing area shall be moved to the west to assure protection of the Category 1 wetland and its buffer. 2. Prior to the operation of the helistop, the applicant shall provide a copy of the liability insurance policy that names the City of Federal Way as a co-insuree with the Christian Faith Center. 3. Prior to the operation of the helistop, the applicant shall provide a copy of a revised safety management plan that identifies how the landing area will be secured during landings and takeoffs to ensure there are not conflicts with vehicular traffic in the parking areas. 4. If the approval for location by the Federal Aviation Administration is rescinded or expires, the approval of this process by the City of Federal Way will become null and void. Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner Page 9 20`h Avenue South Helistop File No. 08-102817-00-UP/Doc 1 D. 47976 XIII. LIST OF EXHIBITS A. Master Land Use Application A-1 - Application Narrative of Project A-2 - Colored Pictures of Site A-3 - Heliport Siting Areas — Comp Plan A-4 - SeaTac Air Chart A-5 - Management Plan for securing the site A-6 - Response to Comments on first site A-7 - Revised Application Narrative — Second Site A-8 - DEIS for Christian Faith Center A-9 - Heliport Interpretation B. Site Plan prepared by Abbey Road, LLC B-1 - First Site Location B-2 - Revised Site Location C. Noise Evaluation C-1 - Noise Evaluation prepared for first location C-2 - Addendum to original evaluation, based on revised location D. Application to FAA for Location Approval D-1 - Application for first site location D-2 - Denial Letter by FAA D-3 - Revised application to FAA for new location D4 - Approval by FAA for new location E. Vicinity Maps F. Notice of Application G. NOA Comment Letters Received Following Notice of Application G-1 - Tamara King G-2 - Barry Turnbull G-3 - Carol Desmett G-4 - Jean Moore G-5 — Elizabeth A. Kari G-6 — Shirley A. Gulbraa H. City Responses to G1 through G6, October 25, 2008 I. DNS Issued October 25, 2008 J. Staff Evaluation with SEPA Checklist K. SEPA Comment Letters K-1 - Tamara King K-2 - Elizabeth Kari L. Responses to SEPA comments L 1 - Tamara King L-2 - Elizabeth Kari M. Email from Public Works N. Email from Lakehaven Utility District O. Email from South King Fire and Rescue P. Notice of Public Hearing TRANSMITTED To THE PARTIES LISTED HEREAFTER: Federal Way Hearing Examiner Applicant — Christian Faith Center, 33645 20`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Project Manager — Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Federal Way Staff — Joanne Long -Woods, Kevin Peterson, Sanjeev Tandle, William Appleton Staff Report to the Federal Way Hearing Examiner. Page 10 20 h Avenue South Helistop File No. 08-102817-00-UP/Doc. Ln.47976 CITY OF Federal Way It's all within reach NOTICE OF INTERPRETATION FILE #07-106054-00-UP Citation of Code Provision Interpretation to allow heliports in the City of Federal Way. No subject code provision is addressed. Summary Statement of Interpretation A heliport shall be an allowable use in the City of Federal Way subject to obtaining a Process IV Hearing Examiner Approval, approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), provision of a dust -free maintainable surface for the helicopter landing, maintaining adequate liability insurance, proximity to I-5, and impact on residentially zoned properties. Heliports to be utilized for emergency services, such as hospitals; South King Fire and Rescue; law enforcement; government flights; and disaster mitigation are exempt from obtaining Process IV approval, but are subject to approval from the FAA, provision of a dust -free maintainable surface for the helicopter landing, and maintaining adequate liability insurance. Date of Interpretation November 28, 2007 Availability of Official File The official project file is available for review at the City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services (Federal Way City Hall, 33325 8t' Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718), 253-835-2607, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Right to Appeal Any person who is aggrieved by this interpretation may file a written letter of appeal to Interim Director Greg Fewins, indicating how the interpretation affects his or her property and present any relevant arguments or information on the correctness of the interpretation, within 14 days of the issuance of the decision. The applicant shall include the appeal fees as established by the City. The appeal will not be accepted unless the required fee accompanies it. An appeal of this interpretation will be reviewed and decided upon using the process for appeals outlined in Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article VI, "Process III Review." Deadline for Filing an Appeal Five p.m., December 17, 2007 City Staff Contact Senior Planner Margaret Clark, 253-835-2646 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on December 1, 2007. File 907-106054-00-UP Doc ID 43220 1 L CITY OF 0 . `N.;�� Federal Way It's all within reach HELIPORT INTERPRETATION FILE #07-106054-00-UP Date of Interpretation: November 28, 2007 Reason for Interpretation: City code does not explicitly regulate heliports and therefore, they are not currently permitted within the city unless otherwise preexisting as a legal nonconforming use. Heliports are contemplated in the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan and indirectly addressed under city code. Absent specific regulations, this interpretation is intended to provide process, criteria, and conditions to consider requests to site heliports within the city. Summary Statement of Interpretation: Heliports shall be an allowable use in the City of Federal Way subject to obtaining Process IV, Hearing Examiner Approval, based on certain criteria and development requirements. Heliports to be utilized for emergency services, such as hospitals, South King Fire and Rescue, law enforcement, government flights, and disaster mitigation are exempt from obtaining Process IV approval, but -shall comply with the following Conditions of Approval_ Definition: Heliport means an area approved for loading, landing, and takeoff of helicopters, including auxiliary facilities, such as parking, waiting room, fueling, and safety and maintenance equipment. Review Process: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 22, Article VII, "Process IV Review — Hearing Examiner's Decision" Criteria for Approval: In addition to criteria contained in FWCC Chapter 22, Article VII required for hearing examiner consideration, requests for heliports shall meet the following criteria: 1. The type of aircraft permitted to use an approved heliport, the number of daily takeoffs and landings, hours of operation, and auxiliary facilities shall not adversely affect the surrounding area. 2. A heliport shall have direct flight path access to I-5 and the flight path shall not be located over any adjacent residentially zoned properties. Conditions of Approval: The following conditions shall apply prior to operating any approved heliport: 1. Documentation of approval by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to utilize the subject site as a heliport shall be provided to the city. 2. The surface of a heliport shall consist of a dust -free maintainable surface. 3. The operator of a heliport shall maintain adequate liability insurance as deemed appropriate by the use, type, and location of the facility. The City of Federal Way shall be named as an additional insured party. Doc ID43248 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalwov.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Was i ton, tha a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or .q posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2008. Project Name File Number(s) Signature Date K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 11 /26/2008 11:45:00 AM Postina Sites: Fcdcral Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 3201h Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street Subject Site - 33645 20th Avenue South K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites doc/Last printed 11 /26/2008 11:45:00 AM 1� CITY OF k Way i �ay NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING 20`h Avenue South Helistop Federal Way File #08-102817-00-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at or about 2:00 p.m. on December 10, 2008, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 8`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA) for the following project. Name: 201h Avenue South Helistop Project Description: The application is for Master Plan approval to construct a private helistop landing area as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center Church facility for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM- 3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Project Location: 33645 20'h Avenue South, Federal Way, in the NE'/4 of Sec. 21, T21N, R4E, W.M., Tax Parcels: #2121049003; #2121042640. Application Received: June 11, 2008 Date Complete: July 29, 2008 Notice of Application: July 29, 2008 SEPA Determination: October 25, 2008 Existing Environmental Documents: Environmental Noise Evaluation, SEPA checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Review at This Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans, Regulations, and/or other applicable State/Federal Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and, location approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering written comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the preliminary plat application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Any person has the right to request a copy of the Hearing Examiner's decision, once made. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. The application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, at 253-835-2640. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 26, 2008. Doc. LD. 47869 44k CITY Federal o. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 81h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was 'Kmailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2008. r Project Name S.A J '. FileNumber(s) ©a-16J R17� .Q P _ Signature Date I I -r-) 5 --b � K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Dlstribution.doc/Last printed 1 /3/2008 4:53:00 PM CITY OF r Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING 201h Avenue South Helistop Federal Way File #08-102817-00-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at or about 2:00 p.m. on December 10, 2008, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 8`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA) for the following project. Name: 201h Avenue South Helistop Project Description: The application is for Master Plan approval to construct a private helistop landing area as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center Church facility for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM- 3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Project Location: 33645 20th Avenue South, Federal Way, in the NE'/4 of Sec. 21, T21N, R4E, W.M., Tax Parcels: #2121049003; #2121042640. Application Received: June 11, 2008 Date Complete: July 29, 2008 Notice of Application: July 29, 2008 SEPA Determination: October 25, 2008 Existing Environmental Documents: Environmental Noise Evaluation, SEPA checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Review at This Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans, Regulations, and/or other applicable StatelFederal Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and, location approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering written comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the preliminary plat application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Any person has the right to request a copy of the Hearing Examiner's decision, once made. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. The application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Community Development Services (33325 8`h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718). The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing. Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, at 253-835-2640. Published in the Federal Way Mirror on November 26, 2008. Doc I D 47869 20th Avenue South Helistop Vicinity Map 41k CITY OF Federal Way File #'s 08-102818-00-SE 08-102817-00-UP Propsed Master Plan approval to locate a private helistop landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way y N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet Print Map Page Page 1 of 3 • a Hiorne-'l News I Services I comments ISearch Parcel Map and Data a RESUBMITTED w oosm --- A_om oouo { OCT 1 7 Z008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY �} BUILDING DEPT. 0072 DOW } DIM Olio 0130 Odso 82 W81 9085 001 1: 1 0040 W20- Pr east f anloTr oa2a 1 r l :r'gi3r J frao� ± W17 i900r 1W21 9p6a2c�5B wegCpun�y�, � . - - I.00is 9dss I: Parcel Number 2121049004 Address 33645 20TH AVE S Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, limetiness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of Ong County-" Parcel Number 2121049003 Parcel Number 2121049024 Address Address 1700 S 340TH ST Zipcode Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER Taxpayer T F MCELROY TEMPLE ASSN Parcel Number 2121049027 Parcel Number 2121049026 33616 PACIFIC Address Address HWY S Zipcode Zipcode 98003 Taxpayer CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER Taxpayer RED CANOE CREDIT UNION Parcel Number 2121049033 Parcel Number 2121049039 Address 34114 21 STAVES Address 1828 S 340TH ST Zipcode 98003 http://www5-metroke.gov/pareelviewer/Print_Process.asp 10/17/2008 MAILING LIST „- p 20th Avenue South Heliport Mailing Labels MAIL PARCEL. NUM MAIL NAME JOWNER;FIRST NAME MAIL ADC)RE5S MAIL= CITY STATE MAIE1p. 2121049003 Christian Faith Center 2121049024 T F Mcelroy Temple Assn, 2121049026 Christian Faith Center 2121049027 Red Canoe Credit Union Schindler Family LTD 2121049033 Partnership 2121049039 Lloyd 2121049040 Hyppa 2121049041 Field 2121049042 Field 2121049047 Valiani 2121049048 A Kalchik Realty LLC 2121049050 TFM Temple Association 2121049060 Inheritance LLC 2121049061 R & K Properties LLC 2121049068 Christian Faith Center 2121049069 Christian Faith Center 2121049082 Fancher 2121049085 R & K Properties LLC 2566200660 Cerda 2596200010 Sanford 2596200020 Allen 2596200030 Swisher 2596200040 Barrett 2596200050 Morgan 2596200060 Ambriz 2596200070 McCurry 2596200080 Love 2596200090 Tran 2596200100 White 2596200110 Overlin 2596200120 Strimple 2596200130 McCurry 2596200140 McRae Robert R, Roger K. & Kristine L- Ila W. Ila W. Rudy & Sheri L. c/o Lewelyn Real Estate Thomas & Dianna Lorena Wesley J. Debra C. & Stephen F. Harriet G. Mark P. & Danae C.M. Owen C. & Audrey M. Hortencia & Batres Jim Tamara G. Dwayne & Jamell Dung t. & Le Trinh T. Shaka C. Ronald D. Joan E. Dennesha Luana Marie 33645 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 3121 Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 98600 Seattle WA 98198 PO Box 869 Longview WA 98632 34114 21st Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 3889 Federal Way WA 98063 20136 47th Ave. NE. Seattle WA 98155 1724 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 1800 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 1920 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 880608 San Diego CA 92168 PO Box 3121 Federal Way WA 98003 2011 S. 341st PI. Federal Way WA 98003 16510 218th Ave. Orting WA 98360 PO Box 902 Kent WA 98035 33645 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 1705 61st St. NE Tacoma WA 98422 16510 218th Ave. Orting WA 98360 2100 S 336th St. #M5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #A1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #A2 Federal Way WA 98003 4318 183rd Ave. E. Lake Tapps WA 98391 2100 S 336th St. #A4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. B1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #132 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #136 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C4 Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 2596200150 Davis Shawn M. 2100 S 336th St. #C5 Federal Way WA 98003 Revised 2596200160 Leung Yat F. & Mei Leung 2100 S 336th St. #D1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200170 Lopez Maribel 2100 S 336th St. #D2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200180 LaSalle Bank National Assn. 3476 Statesview Blvd Fort Mill SC 29715 2596200190 Pyzhivskyy Lyudmila & Vladimi 2100 S 336th St. #D4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200200 Graham Janice C. 2100 S 336th St. #D5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200210 Poland John L. & Cynthia P. 2100 S 336th St. #E1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200220 Ponce Rufugio M. 2100 S 336th St. #E2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200230 Young Delores D. 2100 S 336th St. #E3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200240 Zimmerman Peter 2100 S 336th St. #E4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200250 Migwi Esther & Njiru Elias 2100 S 336th St. #F1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200260 Day Katherine 2100 S 336th St. #F2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200270 Guerro Rene & Susana Lopez 37110 42nd AVE S Auburn WA 98003 2596200280 Lie Shuen P. 2100 S 336th St. #F4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200290 Pace Jennifer L. 2100 S 336th St. #F5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200300 Robertson Gary 2100 S 336th St. #G1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200310 Pak Ki C. & Eun H. 2100 S 336th St. #G2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200320 Faga Victoria & Tuualea M. & Lei 2100 S 336th St. #G3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200330 McElroy John L. & Cynthia P. 2100 S 336th St. #G4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200340 Hefner Harold & Mary 18104 121st AVE E Puyallup WA 98374 2596200350 Taylor Michael C, & Marlene M. 32513 2nd AVE SW Federal Way WA 98023 2596200360 Willingham Matti 2100 S 336th St. #H2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200370 Smith Elizabeth & Shaun 2100 S 336th St. #H3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200380 Hiva Janna Kay 2100 S 336th St. #H4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200390 Jankowska Wanda 2100 S 336th St. #H5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200400 Park Myung Jun 2100 S 336th St. #11 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200410 Bloy Howard J. & Meta D. 2100 S 336th St. #12 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200420 Shi Yin Lai 2100 S 336th St, #13 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200430 Mao Xiaohua Robert & Ting Liu 2100 S 336th St. #J1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200440 Chen Hong Me! 2100 S 336th St. #15 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200450 Stark Janet L. 2100 S 336th St. #16 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200460 Mao Xiaohua Robert & Ting Liu 2100 S. 336th St. #J1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200470 May Dana M. 2100 S 336th St. #J2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200480 Vikse Sylvia D. 2100 S 336th St. #J3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200490 Beltran Jose 2100 S 336th St. #J4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200500 Nguyen Thao T. 2100 S 336th St. #J5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200510 Calvet Celine M. & Woodall Ani 2100 S 336th St. #J6 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200520 Aguilar Daniel & Flor 2100 S 336th St. #K1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200530 2596200540 2596200550 2596200560 2596200570 2596200580 2596200590 2596200600 2596200610 2596200620 2596200630 2596200640 2596200650 2596200670 2596200680 2596200690 2596200700 2596200710 2596200720 2596200730 2596200740 2596200750 2596200760 2596200770 2596200780 2596200790 2596200800 2596200810 2596200820 2596200830 2596200840 2596200850 2596200860 2596200870 2596200880 2596200890 2596200900 2596200910 2596200920 2596200930 Arsenault Ishiwata Paden Vazquez Rice -Kyles Messerle Lish Azar Hodo McKay Beluga Chin Washington Ward Figueroa Monson Walker Leung Sennott Long Henry Hadler Matsuno Cabitac Rhyner Yi Skoog Kingori Cree, Jr. Kim Chae Sizemore Rodriguez Kim Julio Meza Bernard Flores Owen Howard Colleen M. Tornio Kimberly Maree Maria Elene Pascaci Simone Bruce E. Enoch Jung Loretta R. Jonah & Nancy Yuriy L. & Svitlana I. Chua Siew Jeffrey J. Chris & Anna Pedro Roxanne & Phyllis A. Virginia & Njenga Mutu Sing Fong & Shui Lan Jan A. Kelly R. James & Carol Robert & Karena Maki Loreto C. Albert A. Hyon Hui Barbara Anne Wynterae Gordon J. Chong So & Kyung Ja Byung Kwan Charles & Anastasia Lourdes M. Sun Pompeo & Imelda Martina & Veronica Brian K. Jose & Martha Daniel T. & Schulke Krist Michael L. & Kim R. MAILING LIST 2100 S 336th St. #K2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #L1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #L2 Federal Way WA 98003 4530 Montrose Cir. Anchorage AK 99515 2100 S. 336th St. #L4 Federal Way WA 98003 32523 8th Ave SW Federal Way WA 98023 2100 S 336th St. #M2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-01 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-02 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-03 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-04 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-05 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-06 Federal Way WA 98003 8014 34th Ave S. Seattle WA 98118 28710 34th Ave S.#C3 Auburn WA 98001 2100 S 336th St. #P3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q6 Federal Way WA 98003 16601 25th Ave SE Burien WA 98166 2100 S 336th St. #R2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #R3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #R4 Federal Way WA 98003 Revised MAILING LIST 2596200940 Aratani Michael Adrian 2100 S 336th St. #R5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200950 King Tamara J. 2100 S 336th St. #R6 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600010 Saeger Rachel M. 2210 S 336th ST, #101 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600020 Carroll Barbara 29734 52nd AVE S Auburn WA 98001 2897600030 Creson Dennis M. 2210 S 336th St. #103 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600040 Gandara Zachary & Jennifer 2210 S 336th St. #104 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600050 Bourg Steven L. & Pacheco 2210 S 336th St. #105 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600060 Lockwood Desiree J. 2212 S 336th ST, #201 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600070 Everett Larry & Pachman Teren 2212 S 336th St. #202 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600080 Garrett Nanette K. 2212 S 336th St. #203 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600090 Kingori Eunah 2212 S 336th St. #204 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600100 Larsen Jette M. 2212 S 336th St. #205 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600110 Land Henrietta M. 2212 S 336th St. #301 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600120 Kravchuk Vyacheslav & Nataliy 2212 S 336th St. #302 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600130 Johnson Michael J. & Gonzalez 2210 S 336th St. #303 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600140 lyar Gughanathan 2216 S 336th St. #304 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600150 Williams Terence Javon 2216 S 336th St. #305 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600160 Jenkins Don H. 2220 S 336th St. #401 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600170 Gerdes Jeffery & Glory 2220 S 336th St. #402 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600180 Kim Nancy D. 2220 S 336th St. #403 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600190 Pennini Jeremy 2220 S 336th St. #404 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600200 Ilar Cirilo V., Jr. 2220 S 336th St. #405 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600210 Kipper Craig J. & Tracy Roeske 2214 S 336th St. #501 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600220 Miller Hyon Yun 2214 S 336th St. #502 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600230 Diaz Juli D. 2214 S 336th St. #503 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600240 Beatty Teresa A. 2220 S 336th St. #504 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600250 Chang Roberta 2214 S 336th St. #601 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600260 Kirby Anne Marie 2218 S 336th St. #602 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600270 Buck Betsy J. 2218 S 336th St. #603 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600280 Lindsley Tammy M. 2218 S 336th St. #604 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600290 Maurus Robert E. 2218 S 336th St. #605 Federal Way WA 98003 3903800050 Castellar Jose & Evelyn 32517 39th PI, SW. Federal Way WA 98023 3903800060 Huynh Quang Q. & Ngo Thu A 2202 12th Ct. NW. Auburn WA 98001 3903800070 Jomar Investments 321 S. 302nd PI. Federal Way WA 98003 3903800100 Stephens Carl R. 34008 18th PI. S. Federal Way WA 98003 Spectrum Business Park / 3903800110 Plaza LLC 3620 100th St. SW. Tacoma WA 98499 Institute for Family 3903800160 Development 34004 16th Ave. S. #200 Federal Way WA 98003 4129400010 Buck Dale & Betty 404 S. 305th Federal Way WA 98003 Revised MAILING LIST 4129400040 Nguyen 4129400040 Aragon 4129400045 Graham 4129400050 Page 7880700010 Miller 7880700020 Mayner 7880700030 Carlson 7880700040 Yang 7880700050 Whiting 7880700060 Cleveland 7880700070 Hendrix 7880700080 Sim 7880700090 Reeder 7880700100 Kelly 7880700110 Madfai 7880700120 Altizer 7880700130 Atkinson 7880700140 Ganzkow 7880700150 Procaccio 7880700160 Goble 7880700170 Walters 7880700180 Sissons 7880700190 Was 7880700200 Becker 7.880700210 Bussey 7880700220 Warren 7880700230 Livett 7880700240 Mroczek 7880700250 Anderson 7880700260 Kirk 7880700270 Cho 7880700280 Corwin 7880700290 Stokes 7880700300 Moore 7880700310 Desmet 7880700320 Grigoruk 7978200070 Choe 7978200096 Miller 7978200100 920 North 100th Street LLC 7978200100 Turnbull Tri 4229 S. 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 Ana Miriam Cortez 33518 18th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 Cheryl A. 33526 18th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 Thomas K. 605 SW. 316th Federal Way WA 98023 Esther K. 1830 S. 336th St. #A101 Federal Way WA 98003 Betty J. 1830 S. 336th St. #A102 Federal Way WA 98003 Mojgan K. 1427 SW. 352nd Ct. Federal Way WA 98023 Jian 1830 S. 336th St. #A202 Federal Way WA 98003 Leona M. 1830 S. 336th St. #B101 Federal Way WA 98003 Karen E. 1830 S. 336th St. #6102 Federal Way WA 98003 Jonny L. 1830*S. 336th St. #13201 Federal Way WA 98003 Kelly 2316 Olympia Ave. NE. Renton WA 98056 Barbara A. 1830 S. 336th St. #C101 Federal Way WA 98003 Noreene V. 1830 S. 336th St. #C102 Federal Way WA 98003 Mark C. & Lejla 9624 143rd Ave. SE. Renton WA 98059 Caryl J. 1830 S. 336th St. #C202 Federal Way WA 98003 Teresa 1820 S. 336th St. #D101 Federal Way WA 98003 Deborah A. 1830 S. 336th St. #D102 Federal Way WA 98003 Rosella 1830 S. 336th St. #D201 Federal Way WA 98003 Brigitte E. 1830 S. 336th St. #D202 Federal Way WA 98003 Jimmie 1830 S. 336th St. #E101 Federal Way WA 98003 Lisha 1830 S. 336th St. #E102 Federal Way WA 98003 Lucyna 1830 S. 336th St. #E201 Federal Way WA 98003 Shannon L. 1830 S. 336th St. #E202 Federal Way WA 98003 Marsha A. 1830 S. 336th St. #F101 Federal Way WA 98003 Judith M. 1830 S. 336th St. #F102 Federal Way WA 98003 William M. 1830 S. 336th St. #F201 Federal Way WA 98003 Dariusz & Anna 1913 63rd Ave. NE. Tacoma WA 98422 Craig 1820 S. 336th St. #G101 Federal Way WA 98003 Janice & Jerry 37929 53rd Ave. S. Auburn WA 98001 Jin 1830 S. 336th St. #G201 Federal Way WA 98003 Mark 819 18th St. SW. Puyallup WA 98371 Cynthia A. 1830 S. 336th St. #H101 Federal Way WA 98003 Jean S. 1830 S. 336th St. #H102 Federal Way WA 98003 Carol J. 1830 S. 336th St. #H201 Federal Way WA 98003 Victor & Bugaychuk 1830 S. 336th St. #H202 Federal Way WA 98003 Haewon T. 1802 S. Jackson Ave. Tacoma WA 98465 Barbara Fox 1820 S. 336th St. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 Barry 33355 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 7978200101 Gulbraa A. R. 33357 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 7978200106 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200108 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200220 Singh Kamleshwar & Lalita 18826 39TH Ave. S. Seattle WA 98188 7978200225 Garcia Maria 2250 S. 336th St. Federal Way WA 98003 x 41k FederalCITY o, Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederalwoy.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: ❑ Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed Ke-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on ) 2008. Project Name 0 N-4= AJ r File Number(s) CYLI '9) `7 Signature Date ))-ai-09 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 1 /3/2008 4:53:00 PM A CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE PUBLIC HEARING 20`h Avenue South Helistop Federal Way File #08-102817-00-UP Notice is hereby given that the City of Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hold a public hearing at or about 2:00 p.m. on December 10, 2008, in Federal Way City Council Chambers (33325 8'b Avenue South, Federal Way, WA) for the following project. Name: 20"' Avenue South Helistop Project Description: The application is for Master Plan approval to construct a private helistop landing area as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center Church facility for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once or twice a week. The site is located in an area zoned RM- 3600 and designated as Multi -Family in the Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 Project Location: 33645 20`h Avenue South, Federal Way, in the NE 'A of Sec. 21, T21N, R4E, W.M., Tax Parcels: #2121049003-1 #2121042640. Application Received: June 11, 2008 Date Complete: July 29, 2008 Notice of Application: July 29, 2008 SEPA Determination: October 25, 2008 Existing Environmental Documents: Environmental Noise Evaluation, SEPA checklist. Development Regulations Used for Project Review at This Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans, Regulations, and/or other applicable State/Federal Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC; Federal Way Comprehensive Plan; and, location approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Any person may participate in the public hearing by submitting written comments to the Hearing Examiner either by delivering written comments to the Department of Community Development Services before the hearing, or by appearing at the hearing and presenting public testimony in person, or through a representative. The Hearing Examiner will issue a recommendation on the preliminary plat application within 10 working days after the close of the hearing. Any person has the right to request a copy of the Hearing Examiner's decision, once made. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision. The application is to be reviewed under all applicable codes, regulations, and policies of the City of Federal Way. The official file is available for review during working hours in the Department of Community Development Services (33325 81h Avenue South, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718)_ The staff report to the Hearing Examiner will be available for review one week before the hearing_ Questions regarding this proposal should be directed to Joanne Long -Woods, Senior Planner, at 253-835-2640. Published in the Federal Way 11irror on November 26, 2008_ Doc I D 41869 20th Avenue South Helistop Vicinity Map 4ik [ITV OF Federal Way File #'s 08-102818-00-SE 08-102817-00-U P Propsed Master Plan approval to locate a private helistop landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet Tamara Fix From: Teryl Heller [theller@fedwaymirror.com] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 9:46 AM To: Tamara Fix Subject: Re: Legal Notice - Helistop Attachments: 31159987034.doc; ATT00001.htm Tamara: Thank you. Will publish in Wednesday 11/26 issue. Have a great weekend. On Nov 21, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Tamara Fix wrote: Please publish the following legal notice (20th Ave Helistop Hearing, 08-102817) in Wednesday's (November 26, 2008) issue. Please confirm and issue an affidavit of publication. 9'amara Fix Admin .2lsst. City of Federal -Way tam.ara 12ix� oofederaCway.com Optimum Environment A Division of OE Enterprises, Inc PO Box 14712 Mill Creek, WA 98012 Tel (425) 391-8292 www.optimumenvironment.com E-mail Errol@optimumenvironment.com October 29, 2008 Mr. Matt Cyr The Abbey Road Group PO Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98371 RE: Noise Evaluation Analysis Addendum — 20th Ave S Heliport In response to the City of Federal Way's request is a reevaluation of the noise generated by the helicopter event at the new heliport location. The heliport has been moved from the south side of the Christian Faith Center to a location closer to Interstate 5 and farther north than the original location. This significantly changes the impact of the noise levels from both the helicopter event and the influence of traffic from Interstate 5 on adjacent residences. At the original location the heliport was approximately 1125 feet from the centerline of Interstate 5. The new location is only 425 feet from the Interstate 5 centerline. Using the same assumptions shown in the original evaluation, the new hourly Leq noise levels are predicted as follows: Background dbA Added Noise from Helicopter @ 75' Total dBA Distance to Site Boundary Max Helicopter Noise dBA Original Location New Location 56.7 64.7 1.1 0.2 57.8 64.9 75' 400' 72 58 The closer proximity of the heliport to Interstate 5 has estimated background noise levels approximately 8 dBA higher than at the original location. This is a significant increase in backgrond noise levels. The noise from Sea-Tac flyovers remains unchanged. 1 The noise resulting from the helicopter event results in a much smaller increase in the total noise levels (72 dBA) at 75 feet calculated in the original report. The greater distance of the heliport from the site boundaries at the new location - 400 feet verses 75 feet - would experience maximum noise levels of approximately 58 dBA from the helicopter event at the site north boundary. The noise generated by the helicopter event would be indistinguishable from background noise created by traffic on Interstate 5 and aircraft flyovers from Sea-Tac airport. The helicopter event noise at this location would result in no quantitative changes in noise levels at the north site boundary. Sincerely, Errol Nelson PE P f -1 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration October 29, 2008 Mr. Matt Cyr Abbey Road Group,'LLC P.O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98371 Dear Mr. Cyr: Northwest Mountain Region Seattle Airports District Office 1601 Lind Avenue S.W., Suite 250 Renton, Washington 98057-3356 We have studied your Notice of Landing Area Proposal, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Form 7480-1, to establish a private use helistop, 20th Avenue South Helistop, Federal Way, Washington, at latitude 470 17' 58.1"N and longitude 1220 18'.19.9"W (NAD 1983). Aeronautical Study 2008-ANM-603-NRA indicates that the proposal would not be contrary to the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace. Therefore we have no objection to its establishment. This proposed heliport lies in extremely congested airspace. It is directly beneath the KSEA final approach course/initial departure course (8.16NM south of the SEA VORTAC and approximately 8 miles south of the thresholds of KSEA runways 34L/C/R), so the airspace directly above this location is densely utilized by a wide variety of aircraft at low altitudes, including heavy turbojets. It is imperative that Class B airspace rules be strictly observed and that due caution is exercised for other aircraft and their affects, particularly traffic into/out of KSEA. In addition, this location is very close to Interstate 5 (1-5); a heavily utilized VFR corridor beneath Class B airspace in this urban area of the greater Seattle - Tacoma metropolitan area. In addition to transient aircraft, 1-5 is heavily used by law enforcement, news media and traffic watch aircraft/helicopters. This airspace determination should not be construed to mean FAA approval of the physical development involved in the proposal. It is only a determination with respect to the safe and efficient use of airspace by aircraft. In making this determination, the FAA has considered matters such as the effect the proposal would have on existing or contemplated traffic patterns of neighboring airports, the effects it would have on the existing airspace structure and projected programs of the FAA, and the effects that existing or proposed man-made objects (on file with the FAA) and natural objects within the affected area would have on the helistop proposal. This determination no way preempts or waives any ordinance, laws, or regulations of,any other governmental body or agency. No evaluation of the environmental aspects of your proposal has been made; therefore, this determination does not constitute environmental approval under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. You should be aware that the FAA cannot prevent the construction of a structure near the helistop. The helistop environs can only be protected through such means as local zoning ordinances or acquisition of property rights. We recommend that the proposal be developed per established helistop design standards. For this purpose, the FAA has prepared a useful and interesting handbook entitled "Heliport Design", Advisory Circular 150-5390-2. Chapter 2 (AIRPORT GEOMETRY) of this publication is enclosed. 2 When the proposal becomes operational, please complete and return the enclosed FAA Form 5010-5, "Airport Master Record", which is pre -addressed for that purpose. The enclosed Advisory Circular 150/5200-35, "Submitting the Airport Master Record In Order To Activate A New Airport", is provided for your use in completing this form. When the processing of the Airport Master Record form is completed, your landing area will have a site number and a permanent location identifier_ Indicate whether or not you would like to have your landing area shown on aeronautical charts. Charting also depends on the amount of "clutter" already on the charts near your site. Please notify the FAA within 15 days of completing the landing area by calling the FAA Area Flight Service Station (AFSS) serving your landing area to let them know you are activating the landing area while the Airport Master Record Form is being processed. Please tell the Flight Service Station representative that you have received an aeronautical determination from the FAA, and supply them with the name of your landing area and the coordinates. If the proposal does not become operational and/or the FAA Form 5010-5 is not submitted by December 31, 2009, this airspace determination will expire. This is in order to avoid placing any unfair restrictions on users of the navigable airspace. A time extension may be requested, but its issuance will be dependent upon a review of aeronautical activity in the area. Thank you for your cooperation and patience in this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at (425) 227-2641. Sincerely, P,c-- Paul Holmquist Airspace Specialist 3 Enclosures: FAA Form 5010-5 Advisory Circular 150/5200-35 Heliport Design cc: Washington State Aviation (w/7480-1 and map) AAS-330 (w/7480-1 and map) AAL-535 ANM-900 (w/7480-1 and map) ANM-902 (w(7480-1 and map) A�kCITY OF Federal October 24, 2008 Carol Desmet 1830 South 336`h Street, #H2O1 Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED AND UPDATE ON THE 20TH AVE SOUTH HELISTOP, CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER File #08-102818-000-00-SE; 33645 20'h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Desmet: Thank you for your comment letter submitted on this project some time ago. I will respond to comments relevant to this proposal, as that is what we are reviewing at this time. You pose the question why the Christian Faith Center doesn't use the landing pad at the Weyerhaeuser site across the highway. That facility is on private property and not for use by the public. It is my understanding that the applicant did make a request to use the landing site at the Weyerhaeuser Co. property, but the company denied their request. Therefore, they are pursuing approval for a "helistop" landing site of their own. It should be noted that the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan supports using alternative means of transportation, especially for commercial and industrial purposes. At this time, I am writing to give you an update on the current status of this project and to tell you how the application has changed over the last couple months. As you will note below, the location and the description of the proposed landing area have been changed. The "heliport", by definition, would allow fueling, refueling, a permanent landing pad, etc. During the review of the project, the South King Fire Department identified that they could not approve a "heliport" in the proposed location, because a "heliport" allows a fueling station or storage of fuel in permanent structures. However, a "helistop"; allows take off and landing of a helicopter, but does not have permanent structures that could either dispense or store fuel. Since the applicant does not intend to use the area more than once or twice a week and does not intend to have fueling capabilities at this location, the applicant has now requested approval of a "helistop." One of the requirements for land use approval to locate a "helistop" anywhere in the City is that the applicant must seek and receive approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the location and proposed use of the facility. The FAA conducted a site visit to the property and identified that there were several areas of concern that would prevent them from approving the application as submitted. Specifically, the proximity of the landing pad to existing single-family residences, power poles, and trees, and the existing church building. The FAA, therefore, denied the first request for a heliport on the south side of the chapel building as proposed. The applicant has since met with the FAA on site to try to relocate the landing area to a more safe area on the property. The revised location of the proposed "helistop" is now proposed to be located on the northeast side of the existing church building, on a 67 ft. by 67 ft. area in the open grassy field, just north Ms. Desmet October 24, 2008 Page 2 of where the school will be built and west of the wetland buffer area (see enclosed map). The helicopter will travel north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor until it reaches the area close to the church property and then turn directly west towards the church property to land in the field. There will be no need to fly over the residential areas to reach the landing area. We have finished the environmental review of this case and have enclosed a copy of the environmental determination of nonsignificance. Once the comment period and appeal period on the environmental decision has lapsed (28 days from publication), we will schedule the case for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If you are a property owner within 300 ft. of the project area, you will get notice of the hearing date and will have an opportunity to submit additional comments and/or attend the hearing, if you choose to. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-440 through Section 22-447 outlines the process of the public hearing, when the decision of the Hearing Examiner is issued, and the appeal process for appealing the decision. If you have any questions on this proposal, you can reach me at 253-835-2640, or by email at joanne.long-woods@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner enc. Revised site plan c: Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 08-102818 Doe.I D. 47502 CITY OF �. Federal October 24, 2008 Elizabeth A. Kari 2012 South 3 3 1 " Street Federal Way, WA 98003 1FILE CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: 20TH AVE SOUTH HELISTOP, CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER File #08-102818-000-00-SE; 33645 20'h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Kari: I am writing to give you an update on the current status of this project and to tell you how the application has changed over the last couple months. But first I would like to respond to your comment letter submitted on this project some time ago. You stated there was an emergency landing pad somewhere else in the area, and at the Auburn airport. It is my understanding that the applicant approached Weyerhaeuser Co. about using their site across the highway, but since that is private property, the Weyerhaeuser Co. denied their request. You also commented on the noise from the helicopter. The applicant was required to submit a noise evaluation conducted by a licensed firm who conducted an on -site recording of the site on a Sunday morning. It was found that the intermittent use of an area of the property for occasional landing and take off of a small helicopter did not exceed the federal standard. Both the name and the location of the proposed landing area have been changed. The "heliport", by defri lion, would allow fueling, refueling, a permanent landing pad, etc. During the review of the project, the South King Fire Department identified that they could not approve a "heliport" in the proposed location, because a "heliport" allows a fueling station or storage of fuel in permanent structures. However, a "helistop" allows take off and landing of a helicopter, but does not have permanent structures that could either dispense or store fuel. Since the applicant does not intend to use the area more than once or twice a week and does not intend to have fueling capabilities at this location, the applicant has now requested approval of a "helistop." One of the requirements for land use approval to locate a "helistop" anywhere in the City is that the applicant must seek and receive approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the location and proposed use of the facility. The FAA conducted a site visit to the property and identified that there were several areas of concern that would prevent them from approving the application as submitted. Specifically, the proximity of the landing pad to existing single-family residences, power poles, and trees, and the existing church building. The FAA, therefore, denied the first request for a heliport on the south side of the chapel building as proposed. The applicant has since met with the FAA on site to try to relocate the landing area to a more safe area on the property. The revised location of the proposed "helistop" is now proposed to be located on the northeast side of the existing church building, on a 67 ft. by 67 ft. area in the open grassy field, just north Ms. Kari October 24, 2008 Page 2 of where the school will be built and west of the wetland buffer area (see enclosed map). The helicopter will travel north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor until it reaches the area close to the church property and then turn directly west towards the church property to land in the field. There will be no need to fly over the residential areas to reach the landing area. We have finished the environmental review of this case and have enclosed a copy of the environmental determination of nonsignificance. Once the comment period and appeal period on the environmental decision has lapsed (28 days from publication), we will schedule the case for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If you are a property owner within 300 ft. of the project area, you will get notice of the hearing date and will have an opportunity to submit additional comments and/or attend the hearing, if you choose to. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-440 through Section 22-447 outlines the process of the public hearing, when the decision of the Hearing Examiner is issued, and the appeal process for appealing the decision. If you have any questions on this proposal, you can reach me at 253-835-2640, or by email at joanne.long-woods@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, J �� Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner enc. Revised site plan c: Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 08-102818 Doc. I.D. 47503 CITY OF Federal October 24, 2008 Jean S. Moore 1830 South 336 h Street, #H102 Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED AND UPDATE ON THE 20TH AVE SOUTH HELISTOP, CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER File #08-102818-000-00-SE; 33645 201h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Ms. Moore: Thank you for your comment letter submitted on this project some time ago. You reference the fact that there is already a helicopter landing site at the Weyerhaeuser property across the highway. That facility is on private property and not for use by the public. It is my understanding that the applicant did make a request to the Weyerhaeuser Co. to use the landing site, but the company denied their request. Therefore, they are pursuing approval for a "helistop" landing site of their own. It should be noted that the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan supports using alternative means of transportation, especially for commercial and industrial purposes. However, we have noted that you do not support this project. At this time, I am writing to give you an update on the current status of this project and to tell you how the application has changed over the last couple months. As you will note below, the location and the description of the proposed landing area have been changed. The "heliport", by definition, would allow fueling, refueling, a permanent landing pad, etc. During the review of the project, the South King Fire Department identified that they could not approve a "heliport" in the proposed location, because a "heliport" allows a fueling station or storage of fuel in permanent structures. However, a "helistop"; allows take off and landing of a helicopter, but does not have permanent structures that could either dispense or store fuel. Since the applicant does not intend to use the area more than once or twice a week and does not intend to have fueling capabilities at this location, the applicant has now requested approval of a "helistop." One of the requirements for land use approval to locate a "helistop" anywhere in the City is that the applicant must seek and receive approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the location and proposed use of the facility. The FAA conducted a site visit to the property and identified that there were several areas of concern that would prevent them from approving the application as submitted. Specifically, the proximity of the landing pad to existing single-family residences, power poles, and trees, and the existing church building. The FAA, therefore, denied the first request for a heliport on the south side of the chapel building as proposed. The applicant has since met with the FAA on site to try to relocate the landing area to a more safe area on the property. The revised location of the proposed "helistop" is now proposed to be located on the northeast side of the existing church building, on a 67 ft. by 67 ft. area in the open grassy field, just north of where the school will be built and west of the wetland buffer area (see enclosed map). The helicopter Ms. Moore October 24, 2008 Page 2 will travel north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor until it reaches the area close to the church property and then turn directly west towards the church property to land in the field. There will be no need to fly over the residential areas to reach the landing area. We have finished the environmental review of this case and have enclosed a copy of the environmental determination of nonsignificance. Once the comment period and appeal period on the environmental decision has lapsed (28 days from publication), we will schedule the case for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If you are a property owner within 300 ft. of the project area, you will get notice of the hearing date and will have an opportunity to submit additional comments and/or attend the hearing, if you choose to. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-440 through Section 22-447 outlines the process of the public hearing, when the decision of the Hearing Examiner is issued, and the appeal process for appealing the decision. If you have any questions on this proposal, you can reach me at 253-835-2640, or by email at joanne.long-woods@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, I �� GI r64'& Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner enc. Revised site plan c: Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 08-102818 Doc. I.D. 47505 A�kCITY OF Federal Way October 24, 2008 Barry Turnbull 33355 20"' Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED AND UPDATE ON THE 20TH AVE SOUTH HELISTOP, CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER File #08-102818-000-00-SE; 33645 20"' Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Turnbull: Thank you for your comment letter submitted on this project some time ago. You stated you had comments and concerns on the installation of traffic islands at the entrance to the Christian Faith Center facility. The Christian Faith Center was approved through a master site plan process that included review of transportation issues through an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). That application was approved some time ago. Although this is the same property, the comments on traffic calming structures constructed for the church facility should be directed to the City Traffic Engineer, Rick Perez. I will forward a copy of your comments to him for response. At this time, I am writing to give you an update on the current status of this project and to tell you how the application has changed over the last couple months. As you will note below, the location and the description of the proposed landing area have been changed. The "heliport", by definition, would allow fueling, refueling, a permanent landing pad, etc. During the review of the project, the South King Fire Department identified that they could not approve a "heliport" in the proposed location, because a "heliport" allows a fueling station or storage of fuel in permanent structures. However, a "helistop"; allows take off and landing of a helicopter, but does not have permanent structures that could either dispense or store fuel. Since the applicant does not intend to use the area more than once or twice a week and does not intend to have fueling capabilities at this location, the applicant has now requested approval of a "helistop." One of the requirements for land use approval to locate a "helistop" anywhere in the City is that the applicant must seek and receive approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the location and proposed use of the facility. The FAA conducted a site visit to the property and identified that there were several areas of concern that would prevent them from approving the application as submitted. Specifically, the proximity of the landing pad to existing single-family residences, power poles, and trees, and the existing church building. The FAA, therefore, denied the first request for a heliport on the south side of the chapel building as proposed. The applicant has since met with the FAA on site to try to relocate the landing area to a more safe area on the property. The revised location of the proposed "helistop" is now proposed to be located on the northeast side of the existing church building, on a 67 ft. by 67 ft. area in the open grassy field, just north of where the school will be built and west of the wetland buffer area (see enclosed map). The helicopter Mr. Tumbull October 24, 2008 Page 2 will travel north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor until it reaches the area close to the church property and then turn directly west towards the church property to land in the field. There will be no need to fly over the residential areas to reach the landing area. We have finished the environmental review of this case and have enclosed a copy of the environmental determination of nonsignificance. Once the comment period and appeal period on the environmental decision has lapsed (28 days from publication), we will schedule the case for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If you are a property owner within 300 ft. of the project area, you will get notice of the hearing date and will have an opportunity to submit additional comments and/or attend the hearing, if you choose to. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-440 through Section 22-447 outlines the process of the public hearing, when the decision of the Hearing Examiner is issued, and the appeal process for appealing the decision. If you have any questions on this proposal, you can reach me at 253-835-2640, or by email at joanne.long-woods@cityoffederalway.com . Sincerely, cAa4�� Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner enc. Revised site plan c: Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 08-102818 Doc LD 47506 CITY OF L Federal Way October 24, 2008 Shirley A. Gulbraa 33357 20'b Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL FILE 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: 20TH AVE SOUTH HELISTOP, CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER File #08-102818-000-00-SE; 33645 20'h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mrs. Gulbraa: I am writing to give you an update on the current status of this project and to tell you how the application has changed over the last couple months. But first I would like to respond to your comment letter submitted on this project some time ago. You asked why the applicant cannot use a landing pad somewhere else in the area. It is my understanding that the applicant did approach Weyerhaeuser Co. about using their site, but since that is private property, the Weyerhaeuser Co. denied their request. You also commented on the noise from the helicopter. The applicant was required to submit a noise evaluation conducted by a licensed firm who conducted an on -- site recording of the site on a Sunday morning. It was found that the intermittent use of an area of the property for occasional landing and take off of a small helicopter did not exceed the federal standard. Both the name and the location of the proposed landing area have been changed. The "heliport", by definition, would allow fueling, refueling, a permanent landing pad, etc. During the review of the project, the South King Fire Department identified that they could not approve a "heliport" in the proposed location, because a "heliport" allows a fueling station or storage of fuel in permanent structures. However, a "helistop" allows take off and landing of a helicopter, but does not have permanent structures that could either dispense or store fuel. Since the applicant does not intend to use the area more than once or twice a week and does not intend to have fueling capabilities at this location, the applicant has now requested approval of a "helistop." One of the requirements for land use approval to locate a "helistop" anywhere in the City is that the applicant must seek and receive approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the location and proposed use of the facility. The FAA conducted a site visit to the property and identified that there were several areas of concern that would prevent them from approving the application as submitted. Specifically, the proximity of the landing pad to existing single-family residences, power poles, and trees, and the existing church building. The FAA, therefore, denied the first request for a heliport on the south side of the chapel building as proposed. The applicant has since met with the FAA on site to try to relocate the landing area to a more safe area on the property. The revised location of the proposed "helistop" is now proposed to be located on the northeast side of the existing church building, on a 67 ft. by 67 ft. area in the open grassy field, just north of where the school will be built and west of the wetland buffer area (see enclosed map). The helicopter Mrs. Gulbra4 October 24, 2008 Page 2 will travel north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor until it reaches the area close to the church property and then turn directly west towards the church property to land in the field. There will be no need to fly over the residential areas to reach the landing area. We have finished the environmental review of this case and have enclosed a copy of the environmental determination of nonsignificance. Once the comment period and appeal period on the environmental decision has lapsed (28 days from publication), we will schedule the case for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If you are a property owner within 300 ft. of the project area, you will get notice of the hearing date and will have an opportunity to submit additional comments and/or attend the hearing, if you choose to. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-440 through Section 22-447 outlines the process of the public hearing, when the decision of the Hearing Examiner is issued, and the appeal process for appealing the decision. If you have any questions on this proposal, you can reach me at 253-835-2640, or by email at joanne.long-woods@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner enc. Revised site plan c: Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 08-102818 Doc LD 47504 CITY OF 1�k Federal October 24, 2008 Tamara King 2100 South 336 h Street, #R6 Federal Way, WA 98003 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com RE: RESPONSE TO COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM TAMARA J. KING ON THE 20TH AVE SOUTH HELISTOP, CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER File #08-102818-000-00-SE; 33645 20'h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Ms. King: I am writing to give you an update on the current status of this project and to tell you how the application has changed over the last couple months. But first I would like to respond to your comment letter submitted on this project some time ago. You first question whether the applicant can build a school at this facility. The Christian Faith Center is located in an area zoned "Residential Multi -family" (RM-3600, requires minimum lot size of 3,600 sq. ft.). Most zones in the City allow several uses within that zone and have separate requirements for that use such as building setbacks, parking requirements, building heights, etc. The RM-3600 zone allows churches, schools, as well as several other uses. The Master Site Plan approval for this property included the school. You also ask why the applicant cannot use the helicopter landing pad at the Weyerhaeuser property across the highway. That landing site is on private property. It is my understanding that the applicant did approach Weyerhaeuser Co. about using their site, but their request was denied. You also comment on the noise to be generated by the helicopter. The applicant was required to submit a noise evaluation conducted by a licensed firm who conducted an on -site recording of all noises on the property. It was found that the intermittent use of an area of the property for occasional landing and take off of a helicopter did not exceed the federal standard. Both the name and the location of the proposed landing area have been changed. The "heliport", by definition, would allow fueling, refueling, a permanent landing pad, etc. During the review of the project, the South King Fire Department identified that they could not approve a "heliport" in the proposed location, because a "heliport" allows a fueling station or storage of fuel in permanent structures. However, a "helistop" allows take off and landing of a helicopter, but does not have permanent structures that could either dispense or store fuel. Since the applicant does not intend to use the area more than once or twice a week and does not intend to have fueling capabilities at this location, the applicant has now requested approval of a "helistop." One of the requirements for land use approval to locate a "helistop" anywhere in the City is that the applicant must seek and receive approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the location and proposed use of the facility. The FAA conducted a site visit to the property and identified that there were several areas of concern that would prevent them from approving the application as submitted. Specifically, the proximity of the landing pad to existing single-family residences, power F 111,,,111 October 24, 2008 Page 2 poles, and trees, and the existing church building. The FAA, therefore, denied the first request for a heliport on the south side of the chapel building as proposed. The applicant has since met with the FAA on site to try to relocate the landing area to a more safe area on the property. The revised location of the proposed "helistop" is now proposed to be located on the northeast side of the existing church building, on a 67 ft. by 67 ft. area in the open grassy field, just north of where the school will be built and west of the wetland buffer area (see enclosed map). The helicopter will travel north and south along the Interstate 5 corridor until it reaches the area close to the church property and then turn directly west towards the church property to land in the field. There will be no need to fly over the residential areas to reach the landing area. We have finished the environmental review of this case and have enclosed a copy of the environmental determination of nonsignificance. Once the comment period and appeal period on the environmental decision has lapsed (28 days from publication), we will schedule the case for a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. If you are a property owner within 300 ft. of the project area, you will get notice of the hearing date and will have an opportunity to submit additional comments and/or attend the hearing, if you choose to. Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Section 22-440 through Section 22-447 outlines the process of the public hearing, when the decision of the Hearing Examiner is issued, and the appeal process for appealing the decision. If you have any questions on this proposal, you can reach me at 253-835-2640, or by email at joanne.long-woods@cityoffederalway.com . Sincerely, Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner enc. Revised site plan c: Matt Cyr, Abbey Road Group, LLC, PO Box 1224, Puyallup, WA 98372 08-102818 Doc I D 47507 MAILING LIST 20th Avenue South Heliport Mailing Labels MAIL PARCEL NUMBER JOWNER LAST NAME OWNER FIRST NAME IMAILAIDDIRESS MAIL CITY STATE I MAIL ZIP 2121049003 2121049024 "21049 2121049027 2121049033 2121049039 2121049040 2121049041 2121049042 2121049047 2121049048 2121049050 2121049060 2121049061 2121049068 2121049069 2121049082 2121049085 2566200660 96200010 2F5962 02D 2596200030 2596200040 2596200050 2596200060 2596200070 2596200080 2596200090 2596200100 Christian Faith Center T F Mcelroy Temple Assn. Christian Faith Center Red Canoe Credit Union Schindler Family LTD Partnership Lloyd Hyppa Field Field Valiani A Kalchik Realty LLC TFM Temple Association Inheritance LLC R & K Properties LLC Christian Faith Center Christian Faith Center Fancher R & K Properties LLC Cerda Sanford Allen Swisher Barrett Morgan Ambriz McCurry Love Tran White Robert R. Roger K. & Kristine L. Ila W. Ila W. Rudy & Sheri L. c/o Lewelyn Real Estate Thomas & Dianna Lorena Wesley J. Debra C. & Stephen F. Harriet G. Mark P. & Danae C.M. Owen C. & Audrey M. Hortencia & Batres Jim Tamara G. Dwayne & Jamell Dung t. & Le Trinh T. Shaka C. JJb45 zutn Ave. b. reaerai vvay vvrr UODU0 PO Box 3121 Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 98600 Seattle WA 98198 PO Box 869 Longview WA 98632 34114 21 st Ave. S. PO Box 3889 20136 47th Ave. NE. 1724 S. 340th St. 1800 S. 340th St. 1920 S. 340th St. PO Box 880608 PO Box 3121 2011 S. 341st PI. 16510 218th Ave. PO Box 902 33645 20th Ave. S. 1705 61st St. NE 16510 218th Ave. 2100 S 336th St. #M5 2100 S 336th St. #A1 2100 S 336th St. #A2 4318 183rd Ave. E. 2100 S 336th St. #A4 2100 S 336th St. B1 2100 S 336th St. #132 2100 S 336th St. #B3 2100 S 336th St. #134 2100 S 336th St. #135 2100 S 336th St. #B6 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98063 Seattle WA 98155 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 San Diego CA 92168 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Orting WA 98360 Kent WA 98035 Federal Way WA 98003 Tacoma WA 98422 Orting WA 98360 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Lake Tapps WA 98391 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 2596200110 Overlin Ronald D. 2100 S 336th St. #C1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200120 Strimple Joan E. 2100 S 336th St. #C2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200130 McCurry Dennesha 2100 S 336th St. #C3 Federal Way WA 98003 2,596200140 McRae Luana Marie 2100 S 336th St. #C4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200150 David Shawn M. 2100 S 336th St. #C5 Federal Way WA 98003 96200160 Leung Yat F. & Mei Leung 2100 S 336th St. #D1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200170 Lopez Maribel 2100 S 336th St. #D2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200180 LaSalle Bank National Assn. 3476 Statesview Blvd Fort Mill SC 29715 2596200190 Pyzhivskyy Lyudmila & Vladimi 2100 S 336th St. #D4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200200 Graham Janice C. 2100 S 336th St. #D5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200210 Poland John L. & Cynthia P. 2100 S 336th St. #E1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200220 Ponce Rufugio M. 2100 S 336th St. #E2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200230 Young Delores D. 2100 S 336th St. #E3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200240 Zimmerman Peter 2100 S 336th St. #E4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200250 Migwi Esther & Njiru Elias 2100 S 336th St. #F1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200260 Day Katherine 2100 S 336th St. #172 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200270 Guerro Rene & Susana Lopez 37110 42nd AVE S Auburn WA 98003 2596200280 Lie Shuen P. 2100 S 336th St. #F4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200290 Pace Jennifer L. 2100 S 336th St. #F5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200300 Robertson Gary 2100 S 336th St. #G1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200310 Pak Ki C. & Eun H. 2100 S 336th St. #G2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200320 Faga Victoria & Tuualea M. & Lei 2100 S 336th St. #G3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200330 McElroy John L. & Cynthia P. 2100 S 336th St. #G4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200340 Hefner Harold & Mary 18104 121stAVE E Puyallup WA 98374 2596200350 Taylor Michael C. & Marlene M. 32513 2nd AVE SW Federal Way WA 98023 2596200360 Willingham Matti 2100 S 336th St. #H2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200370 Smith Elizabeth & Shaun 2100 S 336th St. #H3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200380 Hiva Janna Kay 2100 S 336th St. #H4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200390 Jankowska Wanda 2100 S 336th St. #H5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200400 Park Myung Jun 2100 S 336th St. #11 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200410 Bloy Howard J. & Meta D. 2100 S 336th St. #12 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200420 Shi Yin Lai 2100 S 336th St. #13 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200430 Mao Xiaohua Robert & Ting Liu 2100 S 336th St. #J1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200440 Chen Hong Mei 2100 S 336th St. #15 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200450 Stark Janet L. 2100 S 336th St. #16 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200460 2596200470 2596200480 2596200490 2596200500 2596200510 2596200520 2596200530 2596200540 2596200550 2596200560 L/�2596200570 2596200580 2596200590 2596200600 � /2596200610 V L596200620 2596200630 2596200640 2596200650 IA596200670 2596200680 2596200690 2596200700 2596200710 2596200720 2596200730 2596200740 2596200750 2596200760 2596200770 , /2596200780 V 2596200790 2596200800 2596200810 2596200820 2596200830 Mao May Vikse Beltran Nguyen Calvet Aguilar Arsenault Ishiwata Paden Vazquez Rice -Kyles Messerle Lish Azar Hodo McKay Beluga Chin Washington Ward Figueroa Monson Walker Leung Sennott Long Henry Hadler Matsuno Cabitac Rhyner Yi Skoog Kingod Cree, Jr. Kim MAILING LIST Xiaohua Robert & Ting Liu Dana M. Sylvia D. Jose Thao T. Celine M. & Woodall Ani Daniel & Flor Colleen M. Tomio Kimberly Maree Maria Elene Pascaci Simone Bruce E. Enoch Jung Loretta R. Jonah & Nancy Yuriy L. & Svitlana I. Chua Siew Jeffrey J. Chris & Anna Pedro Roxanne & Phyllis A. Virginia & Njenga Mutu Sing Fong & Shui Lan Jan A. Kelly R. James & Carol Robert & Karena Maki Loreto C. Albert A. Hyon Hui Barbara Anne Wynterae Gordon J. Chong So & Kyung Ja 2100 S. 336th St. #J1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #J2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #J3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #J4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #J5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #J6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #L1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #L2 Federal Way WA 98003 4530 Montrose Cir. Anchorage AK 99515 2100 S. 336th St. #L4 Federal Way WA 98003 32538 8th Ave SW Federal Way WA 98023 2100 S 336th St. #M2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-01 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-02 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-03 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-04 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-05 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-06 Federal Way WA 98003 8014 34th Ave S. Seattle WA 98118 28710 34th Ave S.#C3 Auburn WA 98001 2100 S 336th St. #P3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P6 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200850 596200860 2596 2596200880 2596200890 2596200900 2596200910 2596200920 2596200930 2596200940 2596200950 2897600010 2897600020 2897600030 2897600040 2897600050 2897600060 2897600070 2897600080 897600090 289760010/ 2897600110 2897600120 2897600130 2897600140 2897600150 897600160 22s m0 za 2897600180 2897600190 �2897600200 2897600210 /2897600220 ✓ 2897600230 2897600240 2897600250 Chae Sizemore Rodriguez Kim Julio Meza Bernard Flores Owen Howard Aratani King Saeger Carroll Creson Gandara Bourg Lockwood Everett Garrett Kingori Larsen Land Kravchuk Johnson lyar Williams Jenkins McClure Kim Pennini Ilar Kipper Miller Diaz Beatty Chang MAILING LIST Byung Kwan Charles & Anastasia Lourdes M. Sun Pompeo & Imelda Martina & Veronica Brian K. Jose & Martha Daniel T. & Schulke Krist Michael L. & Kim R. Michael Adrian Tamara J. Rachel M. Barbara Dennis M. Zachary & Jennifer Steven L. & Pacheco Desiree J. Larry & Pachman Teren Nanette K. Eunah Jette M. Henrietta M. Vyacheslav & Nataliy Michael J. & Gonzalez Gughanathan Terence Javon Don H. Terrace Gus Jr. & Prav Nancy D. Jeremy Cirilo V., Jr. Craig J. & Tracy Roeske Hyon Yun Juli D. Teresa A. Roberta 2100 S 336th St. #Q1 2100 S 336th St. #Q2 2100 S 336th St. #03 2100 S 336th St. #Q4 2100 S 336th St. #Q5 2100 S 336th St. #Q6 16601 25th Ave SE 2100 S 336th St. #R2 2100 S 336th St. #R3 2100 S 336th St. #R4 2100 S 336th St. #R5 2100 S 336th St. #R6 2210 S 336th ST, #101 29734 52nd AVE S 2210 S 336th St. #103 2210 S 336th St. #104 2210 S 336th St. #105 2212 S 336th ST, #201 2212 S 336th St. #202 2212 S 336th St. #203 2212 S 336th St. #204 2212 S 336th St. #205 2212 S 336th St. #301 2212 S 336th St. #302 2210 S 336th St. #303 2216 S 336th St. #304 2216 S 336th St. #305 2220 S 336th St. #401 11615 55th Ave E #B101 2220 S 336th St. #403 2220 S 336th St. #404 2220 S 336th St. #405 2214 S 336th St. #501 2214 S 336th St. #502 2214 S 336th St. #503 2220 S 336th St. #504 2214 S 336th St. #601 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Burien WA 98166 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Auburn WA 98001 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Puyallup WA 98373 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 2897600260 Kirby Anne Marie 2218 S 336th St. #602 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600270 Buck Betsy J. 2218 S 336th St. #603 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600280 Lindsley Tammy M. 2218 S 336th St. #604 Federal Way WA 98003 2897600290 Maurus Robert E. 2218 S 336th St. #605 Federal Way WA 98003 3903800050 Castellar Jose & Evelyn 32517 39th PI. SW. Federal Way WA 98023 3903800060 Huynh Quang Q. & Ngo Thu A 2202 12th Ct. NW. Auburn WA 98001 3903800070 Jomar Investments 321 S. 302nd PI. Federal Way WA 98003 3903800100 Stephens Carl R. 34008 18th PI. S. Federal Way WA 98003 Spectrum Business Park / 3903800110 Plaza LLC 3620 100th St. SW. Tacoma WA 98499 Institute for Family 3903800160 Development 34004 16th Ave. S. #200 Federal Way WA 98003 4129400010 Buck Dale & Betty 404 S. 305th Federal Way WA 98003 4129400040 Nguyen Tri 4229 S. 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 4129400040 Aragon Ana Miriam Cortez 33518 18th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 4129400045 Graham Cheryl A. 33526 18th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 4129400050 Page Thomas K. 605 SW. 316th Federal Way WA 98023 7880700010 Miller Esther K. 1830 S. 336th St. #A101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700020 Mayner Betty J. 1830 S. 336th St. #A102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700030 Carlson Mojgan K. 1427 SW. 352nd Ct. Federal Way WA 98023 7880700040 Yang Jian 1830 S. 336th St. #A202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700050 Whiting Leona M. 1830 S. 336th St. #B101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700060 Cleveland Karen E. 1830 S. 336th St. #B102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700070 Hendrix Jonny L. 1830 S. 336th St. #13201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700080 Sim Kelly 2316 Olympia Ave. NE. Renton WA 98056 7880700090 Reeder Barbara A. 1830 S. 336th St.#C101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700100 Kelly Noreene V. 1830 S. 336th St. #C102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700110 Madfai Mark C. & Lejla 9624 143rd Ave. SE. Renton WA 98059 7880700120 Altizer Caryl J. 1830 S. 336th St. #C202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700130 Atkinson Teresa 1820 S. 336th St. #D101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700140 Ganzkow Deborah A. 1830 S. 336th St. #D102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700150 Procaccio Rosella 1830 S. 336th St. #D201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700160 Goble Brigitte E. 1830 S. 336th St. #D202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700170 Walters Jimmie 1830 S. 336th St. #E101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700180 Sissons Lisha 1830 S. 336th St. #E102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700190 Was Lucyna 1830 S. 336th St. #E201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700200 Becker Shannon L. 1830 S. 336th St. #E202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700210 Bussey Marsha A. 1830 S. 336th St. #F101 Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 7880700220 Warren Judith M. 1830 S. 336th St. #F102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700230 Livett William M. 1830 S. 336th St. #F201 Federal Way WA 98003 Z78807002 Mroczek Dariusz & Anna 1913 63rd Ave. NE. Tacoma WA 98422 7880700250 Anderson Craig 1820 S. 336th St. #G101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700260 Kirk Janice & Jerry 37929 53rd Ave. S. Auburn WA 98001 7880700270 Cho Jin 1830 S. 336th St. #G201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700280 Corwin Mark 819 18th St. SW. Puyallup WA 98371 7880700290 Stokes Cynthia A. 1830 S. 336th St. #H101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700300 Moore Jean S. 1830 S. 336th St. #H102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700310 Desmet Carol J. 1830 S. 336th St. #H201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700320 Grigoruk Victor & Bugaychuk 1830 S. 336th St. #H202 Federal Way WA 98003 7978200070 Choe Haewon T. 1802 S. Jackson Ave. Tacoma WA 98465 7978200096 Miller Barbara Fox 1820 S. 336th St. Federal Way WA 98003 7978200100 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200100 Turnbull Barry 33355 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 7978200101 Gulbraa A. R. 33357 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 7978200106 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200108 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200220 Singh Kamleshwar & Lalita 18826 39TH Ave. S. Seattle WA 98188 7978200225 Garcia Maria 2250 S. 336th St. Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST RESUBMITTED AbbeyRoad /1►V, PARCEL NUMBER JOWNER LAST NAME 2121049003 Christian Faith Center 2121049024 T F Mcelroy Temple Assn. 2121049026 Christian Faith Center 2121049027 Red Canoe Credit Union Schindler Family LTD 2121049033 Partnership 2121049039 Lloyd 2121049040 Hyppa 2121049041 Field 2121049042 Field 2121049047 Valiani 2121049048 A Kalchik Realty LLC 2121049050 TFM Temple Association 2121049060 Inheritance LLC 2121049061 R & K Properties LLC 2121049068 Christian Faith Center 2121049069 Christian Faith Center 2121049082 Fancher 2121049085 R & K Properties LLC 2566200660 Cerda 2596200010 Sanford 2596200020 Allen 2596200030 Swisher 2596200040 Barrett 2596200050 Morgan 2596200060 Ambriz 2596200070 McCurry 2596200080 Love 2596200090 Tran 2596200100 White 2596200110 Overlin 2596200120 Strimple 2596200130 McCurry 2596200140 McRae 20th Avenue South Heliport Mailing Labels OWNER FIRST NAME Robert R. Roger K. & Kristine L. Ila W. Ila W. Rudy & Sheri L. c/o Lewelyn Real Estate Thomas & Dianna Lorena Wesley J. Debra C. & Stephen F. Harriet G. Mark P. & Danae C.M. Owen C. & Audrey M. Hortencia & Batres Jim Tamara G. Dwayne & Jamell Dung t. & Le Trinh T. Shaka C. Ronald D. Joan E. Dennesha Luana Marie OCT 1 7 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. MAIL MAIL ADDRESS MAIL CITY STATE MAIL ZIP 33645 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 3121 Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 98600 Seattle WA 98198 PO Box 869 Longview WA 98632 34114 21st Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 3889 Federal Way WA 98063 20136 47th Ave. NE. Seattle WA 98155 1724 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 1800 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 1920 S. 340th St. Federal Way WA 98003 PO Box 880608 San Diego CA 92168 PO Box 3121 Federal Way WA 98003 2011 S. 341st PI. Federal Way WA 98003 16510 218th Ave. Orting WA 98360 PO Box 902 Kent WA 98035 33645 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 1705 61 st St. NE Tacoma WA 98422 16510 218th Ave. Orting WA 98360 2100 S 336th St. #M5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #A1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #A2 Federal Way WA 98003 4318 183rd Ave. E. Lake Tapps WA 98391 2100 S 336th St. #A4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. B1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #132 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #134 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #B5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #136 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #C4 Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 2596200150 Davis Shawn M. 2100 S 336th St. #C5 Federal Way WA 98003 Revised 2596200160 Leung Yat F. & Mei Leung 2100 S 336th St. #D1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200170 Lopez Maribel 2100 S 336th St. #D2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200180 LaSalle Bank National Assn. 3476 Statesview Blvd Fort Mill SC 29715 2596200190 Pyzhivskyy Lyudmila & Vladimi 2100 S 336th St. #D4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200200 Graham Janice C. 2100 S 336th St. #D5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200210 Poland John L. & Cynthia P. 2100 S 336th St. #E1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200220 Ponce Rufugio M. 2100 S 336th St. #E2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200230 Young Delores D. 2100 S 336th St. #E3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200240 Zimmerman Peter 2100 S 336th St. #E4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200250 Migwi Esther & Njiru Elias 2100 S 336th St. #F1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200260 Day Katherine 2100 S 336th St. #F2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200270 Guerro Rene & Susana Lopez 37110 42nd AVE S Auburn WA 98003 2596200280 Lie Shuen P. 2100 S 336th St. #F4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200290 Pace Jennifer L. 2100 S 336th St. #F5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200300 Robertson Gary 2100 S 336th St. #G1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200310 Pak Ki C. & Eun H. 2100 S 336th St. #G2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200320 Faga Victoria & Tuualea M. & Lei 2100 S 336th St. #G3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200330 McElroy John L. & Cynthia P. 2100 S 336th St. #G4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200340 Hefner Harold & Mary 18104 121 st AVE E Puyallup WA 98374 2596200350 Taylor Michael C. & Marlene M. 32513 2nd AVE SW Federal Way WA 98023 2596200360 Willingham Matti 2100 S 336th St. #H2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200370 Smith Elizabeth & Shaun 2100 S 336th St. #H3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200380 Hiva Janna Kay 2100 S 336th St. #H4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200390 Jankowska Wanda 2100 S 336th St. #H5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200400 Park Myung Jun 2100 S 336th St. #11 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200410 Bloy Howard J. & Meta D. 2100 S 336th St. #12 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200420 Shi Yin Lai 2100 S 336th St. #13 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200430 Mao Xiaohua Robert & Ting Liu 2100 S 336th St. #J1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200440 Chen Hong Mei 2100 S 336th St. #15 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200450 Stark Janet L. 2100 S 336th St. #16 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200460 Mao Xiaohua Robert & Ting Liu 2100 S. 336th St. #J1 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200470 May Dana M. 2100 S 336th St. #J2 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200480 Vikse Sylvia D. 2100 S 336th St. #J3 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200490 Beltran Jose 2100 S 336th St. #J4 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200500 Nguyen Thao T. 2100 S 336th St. #J5 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200510 Calvet Celine M. & Woodall Ani 2100 S 336th St. #J6 Federal Way WA 98003 2596200520 Aguilar Daniel & Flor 2100 S 336th St. #K1 Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 2596200530 2596200540 2596200550 2596200560 2596200570 2596200580 2596200590 2596200600 2596200610 2596200620 2596200630 (r- 2596200640 2596200650 2596200670 2596200680 2596200690 2596200700 2596200710 2596200720 2596200730 2596200740 2596200750 2596200760 2596200770 2596200780 2596200790 2596200800 2596200810 2596200820 2596200830 2596200840 2596200850 2596200860 2596200870 2596200880 2596200890 2596200900 2596200910 2596200920 2596200930 Arsenault Ishiwata Paden Vazquez Rice -Kyles Messerle Lish Azar Hodo McKay Beluga Chin Washington Ward Figueroa Monson Walker Leung Sennott Long Henry Hadler Matsuno Cabitac Rhyner Yi Skoog Kingori Cree, Jr. Kim Chae Sizemore Rodriguez Kim Julio Meza Bernard Flores Owen Howard Colleen M. Tornio Kimberly Maree Maria Elene Pascaci Simone Bruce E. Enoch Jung Loretta R. Jonah & Nancy Yuriy L. & Svitlana I. Chua Siew Jeffrey J. Chris & Anna Pedro Roxanne & Phyllis A. Virginia & Njenga Mutu Sing Fong & Shui Lan Jan A. Kelly R. James & Carol Robert & Karena Maki Loreto C. Albert A. Hyon Hui Barbara Anne Wynterae Gordon J. Chong So & Kyung Ja Byung Kwan Charles & Anastasia Lourdes M. Sun Pompeo & Imelda Martina & Veronica Brian K. Jose & Martha Daniel T. & Schulke Krist Michael L. & Kim R. 2100 S 336th St. #K2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #K6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #L1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #L2 Federal Way WA 98003 4530 Montrose Cir. Anchorage AK 99515 2100 S. 336th St. #L4 Federal Way WA 98003 32523 8th Ave SW Federal Way WA 98023 2100 S 336th St. #M2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #M6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #N4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-01 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-02 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-03 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-04 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-05 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #1-06 Federal Way WA 98003 8014 34th Ave S. Seattle WA 98118 28710 34th Ave S.#C3 Auburn WA 98001 2100 S 336th St. #P3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #P6 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q1 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q4 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q5 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #Q6 Federal Way WA 98003 16601 25th Ave SE Burien WA 98166 2100 S 336th St. #R2 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #R3 Federal Way WA 98003 2100 S 336th St. #R4 Federal Way WA 98003 Revised MAILING LIST 2596200940 2596200950 2897600010 2897600020 2897600030 2897600040 2897600050 2897600060 2897600070 2897600080 2897600090 2897600100 2897600110 2897600120 2897600130 2897600140 2897600150 2897600160 2897600170 2897600180 2897600190 2897600200 2897600210 2897600220 2897600230 2897600240 2897600250 2897600260 2897600270 2897600280 2897600290 3903800050 3903800060 3903800070 3903800100 3903800110 3903800160 4129400010 Aratani King Saeger Carroll Creson Gandara Bourg Lockwood Everett Garrett Kingori Larsen Land Kravchuk Johnson lyar Williams Jenkins Gerdes Kim Pennini liar Kipper Miller Diaz Beatty Chang Kirby Buck Lindsley Maurus Castellar Huynh Jomar Investments Stephens Spectrum Business Park / Plaza LLC Institute for Family Development Buck Michael Adrian Tamara J. Rachel M. Barbara Dennis M. Zachary & Jennifer Steven L. & Pacheco Desiree J. Larry & Pachman Teren Nanette K. Eunah Jette M. Henrietta M. Vyacheslav & Nataliy Michael J. & Gonzalez Gughanathan Terence Javon Don H. Jeffery & Glory Nancy D. Jeremy Cirilo V., Jr. Craig J. & Tracy Roeske Hyon Yun Juli D. Teresa A. Roberta Anne Marie Betsy J. Tammy M. Robert E. Jose & Evelyn Quang Q. & Ngo Thu A Carl R. Dale & Betty 2100 S 336th St. #R5 2100 S 336th St. #R6 2210 S 336th ST, #101 29734 52nd AVE S 2210 S 336th St. #103 2210 S 336th St. #104 2210 S 336th St. #105 2212 S 336th ST, #201 2212 S 336th St. #202 2212 S 336th St. #203 2212 S 336th St. #204 2212 S 336th St. #205 2212 S 336th St. #301 2212 S 336th St. #302 2210 S 336th St. #303 2216 S 336th St. #304 2216 S 336th St. #305 2220 S 336th St. #401 2220 S 336th St. #402 2220 S 336th St. #403 2220 S 336th St. #404 2220 S 336th St. #405 2214 S 336th St. #501 2214 S 336th St. #502 2214 S 336th St. #503 2220 S 336th St. #504 2214 S 336th St. #601 2218 S 336th St. #602 2218 S 336th St. #603 2218 S 336th St. #604 2218 S 336th St. #605 32517 39th PI. SW. 2202 12th Ct. NW. 321 S. 302nd PI. 34008 18th PI. S. Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Auburn WA 98001 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98023 Auburn WA 98001 Federal Way WA 98003 Federal Way WA 98003 3620 100th St. SW. Tacoma WA 34004 16th Ave. S. #200 Federal Way WA 404 S. 305th Federal Way WA 98499 98003 98003 Revised MAILING LIST 4129400040 Nguyen Tri 4229 S. 144th St. Seattle WA 98168 4129400040 Aragon Ana Miriam Cortez 33518 18th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 4129400045 Graham Cheryl A. 33526 18th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 4129400050 Page Thomas K. 605 SW. 316th Federal Way WA 98023 7880700010 Miller Esther K. 1830 S. 336th St. #A101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700020 Mayner Betty J. 1830 S. 336th St. #A102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700030 Carlson Mojgan K. 1427 SW. 352nd Ct. Federal Way WA 98023 7880700040 Yang Jian 1830 S. 336th St. #A202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700050 Whiting Leona M. 1830 S. 336th St. #13101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700060 Cleveland Karen E. 1830 S. 336th St. #13102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700070 Hendrix Jonny L. 1830 S. 336th St. #13201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700080 Sim Kelly 2316 Olympia Ave. NE. Renton WA 98056 7880700090 Reeder Barbara A. 1830 S. 336th St. #C101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700100 Kelly Noreene V. 1830 S. 336th St. #C102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700110 Madfai Mark C. & Lejla 9624 143rd Ave. SE. Renton WA 98059 7880700120 Altizer Caryl J. 1830 S. 336th St. #C202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700130 Atkinson Teresa 1820 S. 336th St. #D101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700140 Ganzkow Deborah A. 1830 S. 336th St. #D102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700150 Procaccio Rosella 1830 S. 336th St. #D201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700160 Goble Brigitte E. 1830 S. 336th St. #13202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700170 Walters Jimmie 1830 S. 336th St. #E101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700180 Sissons Lisha 1830 S. 336th St. #E102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700190 Was Lucyna 1830 S. 336th St. #E201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700200 Becker Shannon L. 1830 S. 336th St. #E202 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700210 Bussey Marsha A. 1830 S. 336th St. #F101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700220 Warren Judith M. 1830 S. 336th St. #F102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700230 Livett William M. 1830 S. 336th St. #F201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700240 Mroczek Dariusz & Anna 1913 63rd Ave. NE. Tacoma WA 98422 7880700250 Anderson Craig 1820 S. 336th St. #G101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700260 Kirk Janice & Jerry 37929 53rd Ave. S. Auburn WA 98001 7880700270 Cho Jin 1830 S. 336th St. #G201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700280 Corwin Mark 819 18th St. SW. Puyallup WA 98371 7880700290 Stokes Cynthia A. 1830 S. 336th St. #H101 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700300 Moore Jean S. 1830 S. 336th St. #H102 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700310 Desmet Carol J. 1830 S. 336th St. #H201 Federal Way WA 98003 7880700320 Grigoruk Victor & Bugaychuk 1830 S. 336th St. #H202 Federal Way WA 98003 7978200070 Choe Haewon T. 1802 S. Jackson Ave. Tacoma WA 98465 7978200096 Miller Barbara Fox 1820 S. 336th St. Federal Way WA 98003 7978200100 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200100 Turnbull Barry 33355 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 MAILING LIST 7978200101 Gulbraa A. R. 33357 20th Ave. S. Federal Way WA 98003 7978200106 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200108 920 North 100th Street LLC PO Box 1157 Tacoma WA 98402 7978200220 Singh Kamleshwar & Lalita 18826 39TH Ave. S. Seattle WA 98188 7978200225 Garcia Maria 2250 S. 336th St. Federal Way WA 98003 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 10, 2008 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Kevin Peterson, Engineering Plan Review Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King County Fire & Rescue FROM: Joanne Long -Woods RE: 20th Avenue South, Helistop Attached please find the revised site plan for the 20th Avenue South Helistop proposal located at Christian Faith Center. They have moved the proposed landing pad away from the building and adjacent residents after meeting with FAA several weeks ago. Please review and comment by September 19, 2008. Thanks. Abbey Road V11aVV Abbey Road Group, LLC P. O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98371 T 253.435.3699 F 253.446.3159 www.abbeyroadgroup.com September 9, 2008 Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner Department of Community Development Services City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98063 Re: 01-104.7 — Revised Location of the 20TH Avenue South Private Helistop Landing Pad Dear Joanne: With this letter and revised site plan the Abbey Road Group Land Development Services Company is submitting a revising the private helistop location for the 20th Avenue South Private Helistop based on recommendations from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The new proposed site of the 20'i" Avenue South Private Helistop is the turf field located on the east side of 20th Avenue South on King County Parcel No. 2121049003 owned by the Christian Faith Center. This site has already received verbal approval from the FAA and will require minimal to no site improvements. Base on a site meeting with the FAA inspector the new site is suitable for a helicopter helistop because it requires few improvements, has a southern approach and departure, and is separate from pedestrian areas. The site will only require a chalked or painted boundary of the FATO on the existing turf surface for FAA approval. We anticipate this location will also be satisfactory to the City of Federal Way. This new location is separate from pedestrian areas and parking areas which should resolve some of staff's previous comments. The new site is also approximately 360 feet further away from nearest residential property than the previously proposed location, which will future reduce noise impacts to the surrounding residents. Finally, movement of the location approximately 686 feet closer to Interstate 5 increases the existing ambient noise, which results in a helicopter landing event that will be less noticeable than a landing event at the previous location which was already within the noise levels permissible by City code. RESUBMITTED SEP 0 9 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. The FAA is expected to issue a written approval of the private helistop site in the near future, and we will forward the approval to the City once it is received. We request that the, City review this new location and schedule a hearing for this permit request as soon as possible. Included with this narrative is the following revised documents for the 20th Avenue South Private Helistop: 7 Copies — Revised Site Plan 7 Copies — Narrative Letter If you need any additional information, or have specific questions regarding this proposal, please contact me immediately at (253) 446-3507. Thank you for reviewing these changes, and we look forward to your approval in the near future. Sincerely, Matt Cyr Y Land Development Planner/Project Manager Abbey Road Group Land Development Services, LLC cc: Ellen Kenison, Christian Faith Center ..l' ""r"'�am"� S= kti ry.?. }..- _ - yyy��R■ ,," lLk-_.' �y� .' .•r _� ..�•.;: -.: •- :�. or Oil— ��• ' 'f - 00 ,�,t i 7 _ +Y. �. _ is •ti 7., ; � � �C'..Y '. � � r t_--.-.� �r;: •(i ^�.. _� .ham -� _ .�.,'r• y, _�x.a � ` .;. "� e 20th Avenue South Revised Notice of Landing Area Proposal F:ede'rai Way,,-V.VA`' S,Gulhaegi+3�C1Y 5 f+ --r• - „•,j �'�'`�� '� ,;,�.';�} __ - !_°3 - - __ .. .. .. Y' � its '.�•,s_ r- 1,.,y; ' • r 71 IM i _ fir,, �+ i i+. ��•'' ._d i' ��: ;- _�. .mot i �*- �� i, t'. i � - •��` '� C i •� vw -01 _ ...__ ri- 1 r CCr,.��.] -ice` �5['��» ' � . _ -J •- � i r - 't-�. •�5!hVx:npl� ' a =_ '�-..�--r^^•�_.�A,. G�JLI ,. _._ .. -.. � •..ram �'x �'•h 00�Talc a'!A: r. i ! �^�('�('j le Goo. le, 1L. 47TxT.9.82"a ._�22• sfi''_2 +r2' �ti _ _. '"'--_ _ eto-. ti'i m '- N%v 9, 2007 �f' ��= - _ ��Y f .�• - -- - �' -..��. -- � .ice;` -i _ _ '�-.�sr-�2,t-�lY�+'•i%�'e�c::�- � .. - - - ti '',.�,*��^-fir � .�'r ` �. .. --•�.r-,-ter_ t _-�- — _ � '' .-. +µ-sr f` ��".." i•, "�-`, .L•f,,. { •� ?!1'..` . - ems' � r` '� ,} - G*s' • r+ [. e-a .-.-i ` .=r - � .. _ s s - •��•'�.; _ ,_,-•-may' - S ;mil ,. 1y� _•y at ,f l ~� Road ad Interstate 5 IQ r- �yi. s�•�.(-A - � .*' ice' - .. �i s ... ./� � is -•r� � r y ' sea on iff[ZIR-Molom Wei _ " - PLC^r':" .j - _ �. -- -011 •�'�� - � �` �``_� - - —::� AbbevRoad �. .ti��, •y i 3� Abbev Road Joanne Long -Woods From: Dennis.Franks@faa.gov Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 10:19 AM To: Joanne Long -Woods Cc: norman.b.lefevre@faa.gov; Jerry.W.Byrum@faa.gov; Clifton.Peterson@faa.gov; Roy.Hardie@faa.gov; Ove.S.Larsen@faa.gov; Paul. Holmquist@faa.gov Subject: Fw: heliport determination Attachments: SADOCOPI ER_LDAP_SMTP_08142008-081934. pdf Dear Ms. Long -Wood: Your inquiry has been referred to me for response. I am a Principal Operations Inspector (POI) in the Seattle Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) and also a member of the FAA Northwest Mountain Region All Weather Operations Staff. I have reviewed the original application and the Inspector's findings, and have spoken with rotorcraft POI's concerning this site and the application, including the inspector who conducted the inspection. Your question was what if any federal regulations (Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs)) would be violated by the on -going future use of this proposed landing site. In short, the FAA basically determined that the proposed operation and the site were unacceptable in terms of safe operations. The fed, however, cannot limit or restrict the use of private property. So while the findings determine that the proposed site and activity does not meet an acceptable, national minimum standard, the person can elect to conduct the operation on site anyway, barring any local governmental limitations or requirements. (The amount of federal control or influence over aviation operations and facilities increases the higher the level of public and National Airspace System exposure there is (i.e., a commercial operation or a major airport).) In this case, we have effectively told the operator the proposed operation and site are unsafe, and its use will be at the operator's (the owner) and the pilot's own risk. If they use the facility and there is an "event", then the pilot may be cited under the FARs for violation of 14 CFR part 91.13 - Careless or Reckless Operation, with potential other violations determined during investigation. In the absence of actually endangering some one else by the operation or some unplanned "event", the FAA often takes no action, seeing the destruction of the aircraft as consequence enough. In this scenario where we have identified the proposed operation as inappropriate, inadequate, or unsafe, we would likely re-examine the airman for competence post event. In all cases, the operator of the site (apparently a church) almost certainly incurs legal liability in allowing and encouraging the operation(s). It appears that the pilot and the operator in this case may be one and the same. This proposed facility had numerous problems. This does not mean that it could not be brought into an acceptable condition. Additionally, I understand that there are other locations on the property that may be acceptable. The reviewing POI told me that he will be revisiting the proponent and location in the future. In sum, conduct of the proposed operation would not in itself necessarily violate FARs. This in no way limits such limitations or restrictions the city may wish to impose. 1 Please call at (425) 227-2240 with any questions. Sincerely, Dennis Franks Principal Operations Inspector - Seattle Flight Standards District Office ----- Forwarded by Dennis Franks/ANM/FAA on 08/14/2008 02:27 PM ----- Norman B LeFevre/ANM/FAA ANM-240, Safety Evaluation & Analysis 08/14/2008 12:40 PM Dennis This is right up your alley Thanks, Norm (425) 227-1737 To Dennis Franks/ANM/FAA@FAA cc Jerry W Byrum/ANM/FAA@FAA Subject Fw: heliport determination letter Can you please give me advice on where I should send this? We value your feedback. To provide feedback on my service, please send email to: 9-ANM-AVS-AFS-ANM-200-ISOFB@FAA.GOV ----- Forwarded by Norman B LeFevre/ANM/FAA on 08/14/2008 12:39 PM ----- Paul Holmquist/ANM/FA A ANM-SEA-ADO, Seattle, WA 08/14/2008 10:17 AM Norman B LeFevre/ANM/FAA@FAA To cc Subject Fw: heliport determination letter 2 Norm, city of Federal Way posed this question and it is in regard to a determination we did on a helipad proposal down there (see attachment). Any thoughts? Paul Holmquist Airspace and Environmental Specialist FAA Seattle Airports District Office 425.227.2641 ----- Forwarded by Paul Holmquist/ANM/FAA on 08/14/2008 10:15 AM ----- Joanne Long -Woods <Joanne.Long-Woo ds@cityoffederal way.com> 08/14/2008 10:08 AM Paul Holmquist/ANM/FAA@FAA To cc Subject RE: heliport determination letter Paul: I was asked to inquire what would happen if they continue to try to land on this facility? ie. What laws, regulations would they be violating by doing so? And, what kind of enforcement would ensue? The question stems from the fact that if they are violating federal/state laws, they could then be violating city regulations. Thanks. Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner (253) 835-2640 ----- Message from "Paul.Holmquist@faa.gov" <Paul.Holmquist@faa.gov> on Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:23:22 -0700 ----- To: Joanne Long -Woods <Joanne.Long-Woods@cityoffederalway.com> Subject: heliport determination letter 3 Paul Holmquist Airspace and Environmental Specialist FAA Seattle Airports District Office 425.227.2641(See attached file: SADOCOPIER_LDAP_SMTP_08142008-081934.pdf) CITY OF �. Federal Way August 14, 2008 Mr. Matt Cyr Abbey Road Group, LLC 923 Shaw_ Road, Suite A Puyallup, WA 98372 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Re: File #08-102817-00-UP; DISTRIBUTION OF COMMENT LETTERS 20'h Avenue South Heliport; 33645 20`h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Cyr: I am forwarding recent comments submitted by residents in the neighborhood surrounding the location of the proposed Helistop location. I will continue to forward comments as they come in. As you may or may not be aware of, citizens can continue to submit comments on the proposal up to and during the public hearing on the application. Sincerely, Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner Enc: Comments from Adjacent Residents: Barry Turnbull Tamara King Carol Desmet Jean Moore c: Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Chris Ingham, South King Fire and Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Fire and Rescue Doc- LD.46636 f -1 44,6W U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration July 14, 2008 Mr. Matt Cyr Abbey Road Group, LLC P.O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98371 ScllG617 1601 Lind Ave., S.W., Sui Renton, WA 8055 ROl1fINGSYMBOL RE: (See attached Table 1 for referenced case(s)) "DETERMINATION OF OBJECTIONABLE LANDING AREA PROPOSAL" ROunNGSYMBOL Table t - Letter Referenced Case(s) INfrIALSP MATURE ASN Prior ASN Location Latitude Longitude AOL 14M8L (NAD83) (NAD83) (Feet) 11 2008-ANM-358-NP,A I FEDERAL 47-17-53.00N 122-18-31.00W 0 WAY, WA I I I ROUrIN SYMBOL Description: 7480-Establish private use heliport. This is a' determination with respect to the safe and efficient use of navigable airspace by aircraft and with respect to the safety of persons and property on the ground. In making this determination, the FAA has ROunNGSYMBm considered matters such as the effect the proposal would have on existing or planned traffic patterns of neighboring airports, the effects it would have on the existing airspace structure and projected programs a 'ffle"Ls0wTLm FAA, the effects it would have on the safety of persons and property on the ground, and the effects that e or proposed manmade objects (on file with the FAA) and natural objects within the affected area would h ve on the airport proposal. ROUnNG8VMWL We have determined that this proposed landing area, would adversely affect the safe and efficient use of t rowe navigable airspace by aircraft and the safety of persons and property on the ground. Our inspector evaluated the site and found the following objections: 1. The landing area is sloped bi-directionally at approximately 5 degrees. 2. There are no provisions to restrict public access to this are and there are building access areas in close proximity. 3. Unmarked light standards that are estimated at 2 to 28 feet in height are in close proximity to the landing area. These are painted brown, and blend in with i surrounding area. They would be difficult to see under conditions of low visibility, reduced lighting at du while in the shadows of the nearby trees to the south. 4. The prevailing winds are North / South, yet the approach and departure are designated as East / West. This is fine for obstruction clearances, but can be of concern for helicopter performance capabilities. 5. There are no markings for this landing area. Only park spaces are marked and vehicle parking would be surrounding the pad in the TLOF as well as the FATO. llhnnah this is a "Private" heliport it supports a facility that has a large public involvement. The above objections proposal need to be resolved prior to approval of this application. ROLR W Mr1BOL INMALSGIGNATUA i h&,— c, or urINGSYMBOL this ROUnNGSYMB0L Page 1 of 2 FAA Form 1360-14.2 (6-89) OFFICIAL FILE COPY U.S.G.P.O.: ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Paul Holmquist ADO page 2 of 2 Joanne Long -Woods From: Sagl2l8@aol.com Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 11:18 AM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: Re: 20th Ave. S. Heliport Ms Long -Woods My name is Tamara J. King, I reside at 2100 S. 336th St #R 6 Federal Way WA 98003. 1 am responding to the Notice of Land Use Application Filed by Christian Faith Center_ Here are my objections. 1) They are already using it as a school and it wasn't zoned for that as far as my understanding was. 2) While I have no problem with a neighborhood church, 1 do have a problem with Mega Churches, since when do churches need a heliport for services. Doesn't Northwest Life use the field by Weyhauser for it's Life flights. 3) Traffic has already increased on weekends around my home and I do have to listen to their music at times which 1 don't enjoy. 4) It isn't good for the environment either, be it pollution, or noise. When they built the church they took a large green area that actually looked nice. Now all we have to look at is what a friend refers to a building that looks like a prison_ 5) Also I take issue with those that don't practice what they preach. 6} Don't give back to the community. 7) Hide how much they pay their pastor and family that are on the payroll. When I wrote to protest the building of the church, it did little good. But I will keep trying to lodge my complaints, and voice my opinion about the church. Thank you for allowing me to respond. Tamara J. King Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? Read reviews on AOL Autos. August 3, 2008 To: Senior Planner Joanna Long -Woods City of Federal Way From: Barry Turnbull 33355 20th. Ave. South Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Heliport for Christian Faith Center Dear Sr. Planner, RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Huu o 5 2008 We received a notice in the mail regarding the Heliport and this is my response to that zoning. I have to admit that I opposed the church in the initial movements for traffic reasons. Since the church has opened I have been very glad to see how the traffic flow has proceeded and have no regrets about the assumed problem. The one major concern is how people cross North and South where the so called islands are supposed to direct East and West traffic. I have called the engineering department but have received no response on that problem. At times I have noticed the police department patrol the intersection but the island must be redeveloped to make traffic flow in the proper direction. The most important part of this letter is for you to look at this intersection and make some decisions on what can be done to improve it. The initial plan was to keep the traffic flow East and West but drivers completely ignore the signs. When they had the grand opening drivers drove by the police and cared less about breaking the rules. Now to the main concern for this letter. We, Charlene and I, have watched the helicopter come to the church and it has come on a route that does not go over houses, but flies over their open field. We appreciate that kind of concern and wish for that to continue. We realize they have to serve two churches on a time limit and we want them to be able to continue. Sincer�'-- Barry RECEIVED BY COMMUNITY DaVELOPMENT DEPARTIN AU6 14 Z008 [M 9-7r 1 ��3 -9� r a - M-141, ■ 1 aCos t�A 1� .- "_O !f I Joanne Long -Woods From: Albin Gulbraa [sdgul@msn.com] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 4:44 PM To: Joanne Long -Woods Subject: Notice of Land Use Application --Christian Faith Center --Heliport August 15, 2008 Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 I am writing to object to the possibility of an approval of the application by CFC for a heliport at their location at 33645 20th Avenue South. First of all, when preliminary meetings were being held regarding building the project, concerned citizens asked the specific question regarding use of a heliport and were told that was not going to happen. This is a residential area, so SAFETY is a BIG concern and issue. Noise is another issue. There already is a heliport sight on 336th on Weyerhauser property , just east of the CFC site, for medical emergency transporting. Why can't CFC work out something with them to use the same site? We have no objection to the emergency medical helicopter use --that is a service to the community where life and death could be involved. CFC's request is for personal convenience. They could land at the other site with someone picking them up and transporting them approximately 2 blocks to the church. The application states approximately once - a -week use, but if approved and built what would prevent them from using it daily? We already observed the use of the helicopter many times after the church began using the facility, which created much noise and it became very annoying. The main objection, though, was the safety issue with them flying directly over the homes in the area. They already were granted the rezone for building the megachurch in the first place and now they want more, for personal convenience. Please listen to the concerns of the citizens and deny this application. Thank you. Shirley A. Gulbraa 33357 20th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 RECEIVED �Y COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT August 12, 2008 To: City of Federal Way (Joanne Long -Woods) Senior Planner From: Carol Desmet (resident of Federal Way) Subject: Notice of Land Use-33645 201h Ave. So. Federal Way Ref: Private heliport landing pad (Christian Faith Center) AUG 13LA I live at South Garden Court Condo's, which is located directly across 336th St. from the Christian Faith Center. Approximately 4 to 5 years ago the developers starting clearing the land for future building of the center. At that time the wild life migrated across the street to our community. There were rats, raccoon, possum and all kinds of wildlife that forced my community association to invest in rodent bait stations. The winter of 2006 when we had the bad wind storm, we had all kinds of repercussion from the row of trees that were left along the property line on 336th St. That resulted in electricity being out for 5 days and trees and branches all along the road way and onto South Garden Court property. Also, all the work done on 336thSt. for months. We as South Garden Court, did not receive any concessions for any of this ongoing construction, plus inconvenience to us as a neighbor, while residents on both sides of us received large concessions. Now our Christian Faith Neighbors want a private heliport landing pad to create more noise, especially on Sunday morning. Why cannot they share the landing pads on Weyerhaeuser property? These landing pads are not used very often. Also, why is it that a preacher of God has to arrive and depart in a helicopter? The notice says approximately once a week, why not two or three times a week, what is to prevent this pad from becoming an active site? Helicopters are arriving and departing from Christian Faith Center already and the noise level is over powering, even sitting inside my home. The helicopters are flying very low, as they prepare for landing and departing. Has anyone in Community Development Services for the City of Federal Way thought about the continued air pollution from this heliport and also visitors to the center that may be arriving by helicopter? I totally believe, we as neighbors need to be considered before giving the Christian Faith Center a permit to build a pad. We have lived in this neighborhood long before The Christian Faith Center first started developing this property. This is much more than a church and school, "this what is called BIG BUSINESS ENTERPRISE." Carol Desmet Lw(� 1830 So. 336t' St. H-201 Federal Way, WA 98003 Ph: 253-661-5778 Sunday, August 17, 200811;49 PM Elizabeth A Karl 2538748485 p,02 Elizabeth A. Kari 2012 S 33Pt St Federal Way WA 98003 Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods City of Federal Way 33325 8" Ave S Federal Way WA 98063 August 15, 2008 20a` Avenue South Heliport (Christian Faith Center) I have been meaning to get around to writing my protestations regarding Convict Casey's wish for a heliport, but keep getting interrupted by work. I've been so busy lately I could easily have overlooked this very important item on my agenda. However, while sitting here at my computer just a short period ago my peace was assaulted by the sounds of a helicopter. It circled more than once; it even seemed to hover. Peace was shattered. concentration was impossible. Frustration built, and then I remembered: Convict Casey wants to do this all the time and the City of Federal Way is once again willing to do everything to help him. I must emphatically express my opinion diametrically opposed to this abomination. I can think of no reason at all — save the sheer laziness and inconsideration of Convict Casey himself— for the "20t11 Avenue South Heliport (Christian Faith Center)" to be permitted. However, I can think of reasons not to put a heliport in a neighborhood. First off, helicopters are exceedingly noisy. This may come as a shock to those that work to help the CFC at every turn, but there is an actual neighborhood located just north of their Big Flat building with actual humans residing there. We humans have ears. And I, along with others I have discussed helicopter noise with, find helicopter noise unbearably loud. When helicopter rides were a part of the Federal Way festival held at the SeaTac mall those weekends of low flying helicopters overhead were a living hell. I called the FAA more than once to complain about the noise generated then. My family was happy when we didn't have to put with those helicopters any longer. The idea of having to put up with regularly scheduled helicopter noise on a permanent basis is unacceptable. How does this belong in a neighborhood? I would love for the city planners, the LUTC and the City Council to explain that to me and then detail how much they would love to have a heliport by their respective abodes. I have a feeling none of them would volunteer for that. I expect nobody with functional eardrums would. I gather the CFC is claiming this heliport will only be used once per week. I expect they will use this as an argument to claim that we residents should have to put up with this further indignity because it's only once per week. Right. Does anybody really believe it will only be used once per week? I certainly don't. They already have services on multiple days plus special events. Having built the thing I think it's safe to say they'll use it on any occasion they please. It'll be on private property, and not controlled. The Sunday, August 17, 200811;49 PM Elizabeth A Kari 2538748485 p.03 CFC used the "we're good Christians" argument at numerous city meetings to assure the City Council that they would obey traffic laws and not do things like drive right around the barrier at the 20`4 Ave S entrance onto 20"' Ave S. They violate that little assurance on a, very regular basis. Many times I've thought of standing on 20t" and snapping photos of the license plates of the violators. Apparently the city bought their argument because I've never once seen a cop there enforcing that. If the city doesn't enforce that traffic law, they're certainly not going to keep track of or have any way of enforcing how often this hcliport is usod. Azi this is not a church of inodcsty I cxpcct that usagc to be far morc regular than once per week. Another thing strikes me about this request is the CFC's progress on all their other varied construction projects. They started the first phase late, had financial problems along the ,way, and finished it late. The city has given them extensions on other phases of their project that remain undone (and already will prolong the misery of residents that many more years). If the CFC can't manage the projects they have already committed to then why is the city even considering allowing them to build something more first? Hey Mom and Dad, I haven't finished my potatoes and veggies yet, but I'd like dessert first! What? If they can't finish the interior of their first project they shouldn't be allowed to start another. At previous city meetings the city attorney stood up and stated that as the CFC claims to be a religion the city pretty much has to let them have whatever they want owing to the First Amendment, although they can be regulated. Now, I'm not claiming to be a biblical scholar, but I don't recall any point in the bible where god states "Thou must have a chopper to worship me." I missed that line entirely. Nor do I see how the lack of this heliport will interfere with their freedom of religion. So far as I can tell this project is completely unnecessary to their ecumenical mission. This project is to suit the vanity of one very proud man who, having inflicted the misery of the CFC on this neighborhood, has now decided he just doesn't want to make the driver from his one business, er, church, to the other. He should have considered his commute distance before insisting on building his monstrosity in Federal Way. This heliport is not a project that will benefit the community in anyway. It will not enhance revenue or be of use to the populace. It will be a private noise generator. The citizenry of Federal Way is not crying out for this. If Convict Casey doesn't like rushing from his north business. to his south one I suggest he stagger his services to allow a more relaxed drive. If he's too lazy to make the drive at all and still insists upon burning up helicopter Riel and increasing his carbon footprint then someone should tell him there is an airport just down the hill from the CFC in Auburn. He could land his chopper there and be standing in his pulpit less than ten minutes later. That doesn't seem like too much of a hardship for him. I certainly hope this city of Federal Way has the decency to say no to this latest CFC demand. We residents have suffered enough. Sincerely, Elizabeth A. Kari CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER HELISTOP MANAGEMENT AND LANDING/TAKEOFF PROCEDURES Helistop: An area of land or water or a structural surface that is used, or intended for use, for the landing and takeoff of helicopters and any appurtenant areas which are used, or intended for use, for heliport buildings and other heliport facilities, except that no fueling, defueling, maintenance, repairs, or storage of helicopters is permitted (2006 International Fire Code). Use: Private daytime use only. Location: 20th Avenue South, Federal Way Washington Latitude: 47' 17'53" Longitude:-122*18'31" Elevation: 374 NGVD Dimensions: Touchdown and Lift -Off Area (TLOF): 33.4 feet Final Approach and Take -Off (FATO): 58.8 feet Safety Area: 81 feet Weight Limit: Not Applicable Maintenance of Area: The helistop will be maintained to FAA standards at all times. Markings of the helistop will be clear and visible and windsocks will be maintained in good working condition. Parking lot street clearers will also clean the helistop bi-monthly to maintain a dust - free surface. Parking lot cones and eye protection to be used for landing and takeoff will be kept in the maintenance garage adjacent to the heliport at all times. Training of Parking Attendants and Ushers: The head of security is responsible for the training and coordination of the helistop. Head parking attendants and ushers will receive directions from the head of security and will be responsible for delegating tasks associated with helicopter landing and takeoff. Once per year the head of security, in association with the contracted helicopter taxi service, will conduct a training of parking lot attendants and ushers to address helicopter landing and takeoff procedures. Landing and Takeoff Procedures: The Christian Faith Center uses a helicopter taxi service for helicopter transport and schedules all helicopter transport in advance. Helicopter transport is currently only proposed for intermittent Sunday mornings to transport staff to or from the helistop. Parking attendants and ushers will be notified the morning of the service if a landing and takeoff will occur. Landings and takeoffs will be scheduled during the service to reduce pedestrian and automobile interference. The following is a list of tasks to be completed for safe helicopter landing and takeoff at the helistop: Approximately 30 minutes before the helicopter is scheduled to land the helistop, the parking attendants will place cones outside the safety area of the helistop. The cones are located in the maintenance garage adjacent to the helistop. At this time parking attendants will observe the weather conditions at the helistop and observe to see if any foreign objects are present that could pose a hazard to the helicopter. R6'niM ii TED AUG 0 7 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. weather conditions are present or foreign objects are observed, the head parking attendant and head of security must be notified immediately. The head of security will have the ability to contact the helicopter pilot and has the authority to cancel a landing at any time. 2. Approximately 15 minutes before the helicopter is scheduled to land parking attendants will be present outside the safety area to direct pedestrian and automotive traffic away from the helistop. Ushers will be present at the buildings adjacent doors to direct pedestrian traffic way from the helistop. Parking attendants should put on eye protection at this time and should continue to observe weather and foreign objects around the heliport and report any unsafe conditions to the head parking attendant and head of security. The parking attendants should also watch and listen for the helicopter. 3. When the helicopter arrives it will hover over the heliport and land within the marked TLOF. Parking attendants and ushers should continue to keep pedestrian and automobile traffic directed away from the helistop at this time. 4. Once the helicopter has safely landed, the parking attendants and ushers should continue to direct pedestrian and automobile traffic way from the helistop. No one should approach the helicopter at this time unless instructed to. The head of security or head usher will then be responsible for escorting staff from within the building to the helicopter for loading or passengers from the helicopter to the building. 5. Once passengers have been loaded or offloaded, and the safety area clear, the helicopter will then accelerate and takeoff. When. -the helicopter is beyond visual distance, the parking attendants will return the cones and eye protection to the maintenance garage. Ushers and parking attendants can then allow pedestrian and automobile traffic back into the area of the helistop. Abbey Road Abbey Road Group, LLC P. O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98371 T 253.435.3699 F 253.446.3159 www.abbeyroadgroup.com August 5, 2008 Joanne Long -Woods Senior Planner Department of Community Development Services City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98063 Re: 01-104.7 — Response to Comments — 20TH Avenue South — Private Helistop Landing Pad Authorization Site Located at 33645 20th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA. Dear Joanne: On behalf of Christian Faith Center, The Abbey Road Group Land Development Services Company is submitting the following revised documents for the 201h Avenue South Helistop: • 5 Copies — Revised Site Plan • 5 Copies — Christian Faith Center Helistop Management and Landing/Takeoff Procedures The Abbey Road Group Land Development Services Company has elected not to adjust the location of the proposed helistop, but instead has revised the site plan to more accurately reflect the proposed location. The following are comments provided by the City of Federal Way, with our responses in bold. Planning Division • Site Plan — The site plan does not identify the total square footage of the proposed landing pad. Please place the total size and dimensions on the site plans. Response — The total square footage and dimensions of the helistop have been added to the site plan. The touchdown and lift-off area (TLOF), which is the only area marked on the site, is approximately 33.4 feet by 33.4 feet with an area of 1115.6 square feet. The final approach and take -off area (FATO) is approximately 58.8 feet by 58.8 feet with an area of 3457.4 square feet. The safety area is approximately 81 feet by 81 feet with an area of 6561 square feet. RESUBMITTED AUG 0 7 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. • The zoning and comprehensive plan designations are not listed on the site plans. Please add. Response — The zoning and comprehensive plan designations have been added to the site plan. ■ Setbacks — It appears the placement of the landing pad is located within the required 30- foot rear yard setback. Please address this issue by stating why it needs to be in this location and where an alternate location may be proposed. Response — Both the TLOF and FATO are more than 30 feet from the rear yard boundary according to the revised site plan. The-TLOF is approximately 50 feet and the FATO is approximately 38 feet from the rear boundary. Therefore the helistop is located outside the required 30-foot rear yard setback. Furthermore, no structure is proposed with this helistop and a helistop by definition .functions similarly to an automobile parking spot and should not be held to rear yard setback standards. Noise — The noise study identifies level of noise upon landing, but does not address noise levels at residential areas on approach from Interstate 5 or upon departure from church to Interstate 5. Please address impact on residential areas directly adjacent to the proposed landing pad. Response — The noise study measured and addressed the impact on residential areas south of the proposed helistop which are the "residential areas directly adjacent to the proposed landing pad." The study concluded that total noise levels remained within City of Federal Way regulations for such an event. This area is the area of highest impact, so other areas would have an impact less than the area studied. Residential properties are not impacted by helicopter approach or departure because the helicopter will approach and depart the helistop without flying over residential properties in accordance with Federal Way's Heliprot Interpretation. Locations to the north of the site are closer in proximity to the Weyerhaeuser heliports that have been in operation for many years, so helicopters are not a new noise to the area. Please see the Noise Evaluation by Optimum Environment, previously submitted, for information regarding the noise of a helicopter event at the proposed location. Safety — Since this pad will be located in an area adjacent to and designated for parking, the area needs to be secured so the helicopter can land safely and will not intrude into or create a safety concern for church attendees or employees accessing their cars near the area. Please provide a description how the area will be secured during use. Response — The proposed Christian Faith Center Helistop Management and Landing/Takeoff Procedures will be added to the Christian Faith Center Facility Manual upon approval of this application. Because this site will make use of a helicopter taxi service, landings and takeoffs will be planned and scheduled. At this time they will only occur occasionally on Sundays during the later portion of the church service. Traffic cones, parking lot attendants, and church ushers will be used to secure the area during landings and takeoffs. Please see the proposed Christian Faith Center Helistop Management and Landing/Takeoff Procedures for more information. Approvals — In order for this to be an allowed use in the City, the applicant must obtain the Process IV Hearing Examiner Approval, approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), provisions of a dust -free maintainable surface for the landing, and maintain adequate liability insurance. Please forward a copy of the FAA approval as soon as it is received so we can include it in the file and the packet submitted to the Hearing Examiner. Also, provide a short narrative explaining how/when the area will be maintained. Response — FAA approval and a summary of liability insurance will be forwarded to the City prior to Hearing Examiner's approval. The surface maintenance for the helistop can be summarized in the following narrative: The 20th Avenue South Helistop is proposed on the existing asphalt parking lot of the Christian Faith Center. Asphalt is a dust -free maintainable surface. The Christian Faith Center uses a street sweeper service to clean the parking lot bi-monthly, including the proposed helistop location to ,keep it a dust -free surface. Public Works This proposal does not appear to include refueling facilities. Refueling will not be approved for this site unless specific plans for water quality protection and treatment are provided to and approved by the Public Works Department. Response — There will be no refueling facilities at the proposed 20t" Avenue South Helistop. Traffic Division The proposal eliminates 28 parking stalls. This appears to conflict with the Traffic Management Plan (TMP) for the site. The TMP needs to be updated to demonstrate that the loss of parking can be accommodated for all approved uses on -site (not just current uses). Response — The TLOF, FATO, and safety area do not impact parking based on existing conditions. According to the site plan there are approximately 1444 parking spaces provided at the Christian Faith Center. The April 2, 2007 Amended Development Agreement requires there to be a minimum of 1406 and a maximum of 1540 parking spaces for the Christian Faith Center. Therefore, since the helistop does not impact parking and does not cause the overall parking to fall below the minimum stated in the development agreement, there is no impact to parking from this proposal. Management of the space reserved for the heliport also should be demonstrated. How does the applicant intend to ensure that site circulation is not compromised, and if not permanent, how is space for the helicopter reserved? My understanding is that the definition of a heliport versus a helipad is critical in distinguishing the relative permanence of supporting facilities that may negate or heighten site circulation impacts. This needs clarification. Response — Management of the helistop is addressed in the Christian Faith Center Helistop Management and Landing/Takeoff Procedures included with this response. The private 'helistop is only proposed to be used on intermittent Sundays during the later portion of the Sunday service, before church service has ended, to transport church staff to and/or from the Christian Faith Center's Everett location. Because the church uses a helicopter taxi service, landing and takeoff events are scheduled in advance and can be planned for prior to the helicopter's arrival. Also, because helicopter use is time sensitive, the helicopter will not remain at the helistop for an extended amount of time. The Christian Faith Center parking lot has adequate circulation to handle such a brief event. Finally, there are parking attendants to provide safety during the helicopter landing and takeoff, and they will also be available to direct traffic and aid in circulation. South King Fire and Rescue The 2006 International Fire Code defines helicopter landing areas as: o Heliport: An area of land or water or a structural surface that is used, or intended for use, for the landing and takeoff of helicopters and any appurtenant areas which are used, or intended for use, for heliport buildings and other heliport facilities. o Helistop: the same as "Heliport," except that no fueling, defueling, maintenance, repairs, or storage of helicopters is permitted. South King Fire and Rescue cannot approve the proposed landing area if it is declared a Heliport. This would allow storage of helicopters at the location, thus obstructing the fire apparatus access road. We would consider an alternative location on the site that does not obstruct fire access. Response — The helicopter landing will be classified as a "Helistop" and operate in accordance with the definition of a helistop. While helicopters will not be stored at the site for an extend amount of time, when a helicopter is present there will still be a 24 foot clearance for fire access around the TLOF. If you need any additional information, or have specific questions regarding this proposal, please contact me immediately at,(253) 446-3507. Thank you for reviewing these changes, and we look forward to your approval in the near future. Sincerely, Matt Cyr Y Land Development Planner/Project Manager Abbey Road Group Land Development Services, LLC cc: Ellen Kenison, Christian Faith Center CITY OF, Federal Way Project Name: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8'h Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 . RESUBMITTED 253-8352607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoi%deralwa .cam AUG 0 7 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BUILDING DEPT. SIGN INSTALLATION CERTIFICATE v -t-' A v e- - S 0,-P- /, - Project File No: Project Address: 3'3 6 `yS 7,c A v-e—v( Installed By: t4,,l Date of Installation: Location of Installation: S 33 6 s :Apv i.i is iBiJ :Cii.. `iii :.#i i:ASl.i8&.!aii c: ?a ii PYi:.:.1A1 i`._ih NEf uBi 4 .'.'.a a. ::Y. ': +: ':;�i :ia�� +i 49 E. _:W i:.:YYi :i�@C:: •%Y'C '.:Ai: :IY: Ni d. :YY Ni .' r�rawr,Z,"N.era,rJ ra�ra�a,N Ni I hereby testify that the sign installed fully complies with the installation standards of the Department of Community Development Service's "Instructions for Obtaining & Posting Public Notification Signs" and that the sign will be maintained until a final decision is issued on the land use action. I understand that failure to return this certificate within five days of posting may result in delays, notice of corrections, and re -mailings at the applicant's expense. Installer's Name Installer's Signature Date 7-5-3 Phone Bulletin 4036 — August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Sign Installation Certificate CITY OF FEDERAL WAY NOTICE OF LAND USE AppLiCATION Name: 20th Avenue South Heliport (Chris- tian Faith Center) Description: Master plan approval to construct a private heliport landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center for air taxi pick up andfor drop off approximately once a week. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 207, Puyallup, WA 98372 Location: 33645 20th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: June 11, 2008 Date Determined Complete-. July 29, 2008 Date of Notice of Application:lY29, 20Q8 Permits Required .by this Application: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File #08- 102818-00-SE); Land Use Permit (File #08- 102817.00•UP); FAA Permit Approval Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA Checklist, DEIS for Christian Faith Center, Noise Evaluation Relevant Environmental Documents areail-' able at the Address Below: X_YES. NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Proj- ect Mitigation, Known at the Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental PoIW' (SEPA), FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Sur- face and Stormwater Management'; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regu- lations including the FWCC and King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Fede rat Way. Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the Director of Community Development Services by August 18. 2008. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the pub - tic hearing to give comments orally. NOfilicat+on of the public hearing date will occur approxi- mately 15 days prier to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral. comments to the Hearing Examiner may chal- lenge the decision of the Hearing Examiner:,, Contact: Senior Planner Joanne Long -Wood 253-836-2640 City of Federal Way ` 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 FWM 1423 Date of Publication: August 2, 2008 FEDERAL WAY - 01 �V..._IRR A SOUND PUBLISHNG NEWSPAPER Affidavit of Publication Rudi Alcott, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that he is the Publisher of The Federal Way Mirror, a semi -weekly newspaper. That said newspaper is published in the English language continually as a semi -weekly newspaper in Federal Way, King County, Washington, and is now and during all of said time has been printed in an office maintained at the aforementioned place of publication of said newspaper. That the annexed is a true copy of a legal advertisement placed by City of Federal Way — Community Development Dept. L-1423 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplemental form) of said newspaper once each week for a period of one consecutive week(s), commencing on the 2nd day of August, 2008 , and ending on the 2nd day of August, 2008, both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its readers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $134.11 which amount has been paid in full, or billed at the legal rate according to RCW 65.16.090 Subscribed to and sworn before me this 21 st day of August, 2008. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, Residing at Federal Way �4 N OTA R r ro .tN P U B L ko�,:�+�x� 1414 S. 3241h STREET, SUITE B210, FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 ■ 253-925-5565 ■ FAY: 253-925-5750 CITY OF Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION ►,LZMO-S�CK hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of VVIshington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was mailed ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on /'t f , 2008. Project Name 2-o"'-yy-nu-,L S . Rdi ®r-r Chip shca o Fa fl) Ce&-'r-� File Number(s) - (OZ`dl � - 00 --<re ' a-102I'j -00 -{,(-p Si Date K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 7/28/2008 10:33:00 AM CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: 20`h Avenue South Heliport (Christian Faith Center) Description: Master plan approval to construct a private heliport landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once a week. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 207, Puyallup, WA 98372 Location: 33645 20t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: June 11, 2008 Date of Notice of Application: July 29, 2008 Date Determined Complete: July 29, 2008 Permits Required by this Application: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File #08-102818-00-SE); Land Use Permit (File #08-102817-00-UP); FAA Permit'Approval Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA Checklist, DEIS for Christian Faith Center, Noise Evaluation Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at the Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC and King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way. Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the Director of Community Development Services by August 18, 2008. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the public hearing to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may challenge the decision of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods, 253-835-2640 City of Federal Way 33325 8t' Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on August 2, 2008. File #08-102817-00-UP Doe ID 46443 20th Avenue South Heliport (Christian Faith Center) Vicinity Map S 333T n LJ S 336 S.T Lji I � � S 340 ST � "tM `3 �j S 341 ST CO !r S 333 ST * --"` _T- I� 41k CITY OF 40�� Federal Way File 08-102817-00-UP Propsed Master Plan approval to construct a private heliport landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center. City of Federal Way I' 1 0 N 0 300 600 900 1200 Feet Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.c i i yo f f edera lway. c o rn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was ❑ mailed ❑ faxed(e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on /( 2008. Project Name File Numbers) Signature Date7/-F/ ZJ2 K:\CD Administration Files\Declaration of Distribution.doc/Last printed 7/28/2008 10:33:00 AM c}rr OF Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: 20t' Avenue South Heliport (Christian Faith Center) Description: Master plan approval to construct a private heliport landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once a week. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr, PO Box 207, Puyallup, WA 98372 Location: 33645 20`h Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: June 11, 2008 Date of Notice of Application: July 29, 2008 Date Determined Complete: July 29, 2008 Permits Required by this Application: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File #08-102818-00-SE); Land Use Permit (File #08-102817-00-UP); FAA Permit Approval Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA Checklist, DEIS for Christian Faith Center, Noise Evaluation Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at the Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Storniwater Management"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC and King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way. Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the Director of Community Development Services by August 18, 2008. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address below). Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the public hearing to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may challenge the decision of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods, 253-835-2640 City of Federal Way 33325 8"' Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on August 2, 2008. File ROM 02817-00-UP Doc ID 46443 Tina Piety From: Teryl Heller [theller@fedwaymirror.com] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:59 AM To: Tina Piety Subject: Re: Legal Notice Attachments: 20th Ave S Heliport NOA.DOC Hi Tina: Got it ---it will be in 8/2/08 issue. Thanks. Teryl Heller Federal Way Mirror 1414 South 324th Street, Suite B210 Federal Way, WA 98003 (phone) 253-925-5565 (fax) 253-925-5750 On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Tina Piety wrote: Hello, Please publish the attached legal notice (20th Avenue South Heliport NOA, 08-102817-00-UP) in Saturday's (8/2/08) issue. Please furnish an affidavit of publication. Thank you, 7-z�n�A�q,ty, 4 - ratz-*eAk4tanrll Community Development Services City of Federal Way Street: 33325 8th Avenue South Mail: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063 253-835-2601; Fax 253-835-2609 41k CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8th Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way WA 98063-9718 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cttvoffe(�gralway.com com DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, &C/Li C/hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Wbshington, tat a: A Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Notice of Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Anticipated DNS/MDNS ❑ FWCC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document was %❑ mailed g ❑ faxed ❑ e-mailed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on 2008. Project Name Lid -7� File Number(s) �� _ 040 t I " Signature Date K:\Intern\Declaration of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 7/28/2008 11:33:00 AM Posting Sites: Federal Way City Hall - 33325 8th Avenue Federal Way Regional Library - 34200 1 st Way South Federal Way 320th Branch Library - 848 South 320th Street K:\Intem\Declaratlon of Distribution with Posting Sites.doc/Last printed 7/28/2008 11:33:00 AM CITY or Federal Way NOTICE OF LAND USE APPLICATION Name: 20t1i Avenue South Heliport (Christian Faith Center) Description: Master plan approval to construct a private heliport landing pad as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once a week. Applicant: Abbey Road Group, LLC, Attu: Matt Cyr, PO Box 207, Puyallup, WA 98372 Location: 33645 20t' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA Date Application Received: June 11, 2008 Date of Notice of Application: July 29, 2008 Date Determined Complete: July 29, 2008 Permits Required by this Application: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (File 408-102818-00-SE); Land Use Permit (File #08-102817-00-UP); FAA Permit Approval Existing Environmental Documents: SEPA Checklist, DEIS for Christian Faith Center, Noise Evaluation Relevant Environmental Documents are Available at the Address Below: X YES NO Development Regulations to Be Used for Project Mitigation, Known at the Time: Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 18, "Environmental Policy" (SEPA); FWCC Chapter 19, "Planning and Development"; FWCC Chapter 21, "Surface and Stormwater Management"; and FWCC Chapter 22, "Zoning." Consistency with Applicable City Plans and Regulations: The project will be reviewed for consistency with all applicable codes and regulations including the FWCC and King County Surface Water Design Manual as amended by the City of Federal Way. Any person may submit written comments on the Notice of Land Use Application to the Director of Community Development Services by August 18, 2008. The official project file is available for public review at the Department of Community Development Services (address,below)._Any person has the right to submit written comments to the Hearing Examiner and appear at the public hearing to give comments orally. Notification of the public hearing date will occur approximately 15 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. Only persons who submit written or oral comments to the Hearing Examiner may challenge the decision of the Hearing Examiner. Contact: Senior Planner Joanne Long -Woods, 253-835-2640 City of Federal Way 33325 8's Avenue South PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Published in the Federal Way Mirror on August 2, 2008. File #08-102817-00-UP Doc ID 46443 CITY OF t. Federal Way July 31, 2008 Mr. Matt Cyr Abbey Road Group; LLC 923 Shaw Road, Suite A Puyallup, WA 98372 CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Re: File #08-102817-00-UP; Complete Application/Revised Request for Additional Information 20'h Avenue South Heliport; 36645 201h Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Cyr: On June 11, 2008, the Department of Community Development Services received the application on behalf of the Christian Faith Center for a proposed heliport off of 201h Avenue South. The project is being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20 and Chapter 22, Process W Review. The proposed heliport landing area is located on the site of the Christian Faith Center church parking lot and is zoned Residential Multifamily (RM) 3600, with a 7,200 square foot minimum lot size and a comprehensive plan designation of Multifamily. COMPLETE APPLICATION After further review of the application materials, the application is deemed complete as of July 29, 2008. A 120-day timeline for reviewing the project has started as of this date. The City has 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. As you are aware, the 120- day timeline may be stopped if the City determines that additional information is needed to meet the requirements of the FWCC as discussed below. Since additional information is being requested, the 120- day timeline is being placed on temporary hold until submittal of the additional information. NOTICING Having met the submittal requirements, your application is now ready for processing. Therefore, pursuant to the FWCC, a Notice of Application will be published in the Federal Way Mirror on August 2, 2008, and other public notice will be given based on City procedures. The Department of Community Development Services has responsibility to notify other agencies that may have jurisdiction over your development project or an interest in it. The applicant has various requirements associated with public notices for the 201h Avenue South Heliport. Public notice of the complete application shall occur in accordance with FWCC Section 20-118, as noted below: File 408-102817-00-UP Doc I D 46442 Mr. Matt Cyr Page 2 July 31, 2008 • The public will be notified of the complete application through the mailed notices and on -and off - site notices. The applicant is responsible for installation of two on -site notice boards: one on -site notice board along the main entrance at 20`h Avenue South and one along the south entrance to the property, South 341" Place. This must be installed on or before August 14, 2008. (This is within 14 calendar days of the issuance of the letter of complete application.) The City will prepare the four -foot by four -foot notice boards, which will be available for pickup by 4:00 p.m., Friday, August 1, 2008. A $40.00 fee per board is due at the time the notice board is picked up. Please refer to the enclosed public notice board handout for installation instructions. 0 At the time of the SEPA determination and of the date for the public hearing, the City will update notices on the installed large public notice board. 0 The applicant is responsible for removal of the public notice board, which shall occur within seven calendar days after the final decision of the City on the matter. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED As mentioned above and as outlined in previous correspondence, the following technical information was identified by staff during an internal review process and is being requested again at this time. These early comments are provided for your benefit. Additional comments may follow as staff completes their reviews. Planning Division, Joanne Long -Woods, 253-835-2640 1. Site Plan — The site plan does not identify the total square footage of the proposed landing pad. Please place the total size and dimensions on the site plans. 2. The zoning and comprehensive plan designations are not listed on the site plans. Please add. 3. Setbacks —It appears the placement of the landing pad is located within the required 30-foot rear yard setback. Please address this issue by stating why it needs to be in this location and where an alternate location may be proposed. 4. Noise —The noise study identifies level of noise upon landing, but does not address noise levels at residential areas on approach from Interstate 5, or upon departure from the church to Interstate 5. Please address impact on residential areas directly adjacent to the proposed landing pad. 5. Safety— Since this pad will be located in an area adjacent to and designated for parking and circulation, the area needs to be secured so the helicopter can land safely and will not intrude into or create a safety concern for church attendees or employees accessing their cars near this area. Please provide a narrative description on how the area will be secured during use. Approvals — In order for this to be an allowed use in the City, the applicant must obtain the Process 1V Hearing Examiner Approval, approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), provisions of a dust -free maintainable surface for the landing, and maintain adequate liability insurance. Please forward a copy of the FAA approval as soon as it is received so we can include it in the file and the packet submitted to the Hearing Examiner. Also, provide a short narrative explaining how/when the area will be maintained. File#08-102817-00-UP Doc ID 46442 Mr. Matt Cyr Page 3 July 31, 2008 Public Works, Ann Dower, Engineering Plans Review, 235-835-2732 Regarding the information provided on June 11, 2008, for a heliport facility at Christian Faith Center: This proposal does not appear to include refueling facilities. Refueling will not be approved for this site unless specific plans for water quality protection and treatment are provided and approved by the Public Works Department. Traffic Division, Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer, 253-835-2740 I have reviewed the submitted materials and have the following comments: + The proposal eliminates 28 parking stalls. This appears to conflict with the Traffic Management Plan (TMP) for the site. The TMP needs to be updated to demonstrate that the loss of parking can be accommodated for all approved uses on -site (not just the current uses). • Management of the space reserved for the heliport also should be demonstrated. How does the applicant intend to ensure that site circulation is not compromised, and if not permanent, how is space for the helicopter reserved? My understanding is that the definition of a heliport versus a helipad is critical in distinguishing the relative permanence of supporting facilities that may negate or heighten site circulation impacts. This needs to be clarified. Building Division, Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official, 253-835-2640 No comments on the heliport at this time. South King Fire & Rescue, Chris Ingham, Deputy Fire Marshal, 253-529-7206 The 2006International Fire Code defines helicopter landing areas as: • HELIPORT. An area of land or water or a structural surface that is used, or intended for use, for the landing and taking off of helicopters and any appurtenant areas which are used, or intended for use, for heliport buildings and other heliport facilities. • HELISTOP. The same as "Heliport," except that no fueling, defueling, maintenance, repairs, or storage of helicopters is permitted. South King Fire and Rescue cannot approve the proposed landing area if it is declared a Heliport. This would allow storage of helicopters at the location, thus obstructing the fire apparatus access road. We would consider an alternative location on the site that does not obstruct fire access. Lakehaven Utility District, Brian Asbury, Engineering Technician 1II, 253-835-2640 Lakehaven has no comment on this issue, as based on the submittal it appears no existing and/or future Lakehaven water/sewer facilities will be required, desired, or affected by the proposed land use action. File k08-102817-00-UP Doc I 46442 Mr. Matt Cyr Page 4 July 31, 2008 When submitting additional information, five copies of any revised plans and four copies of any report accompanied by the completed "Resubmittal Information Form" must be provided. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you have any questions about this letter or your application, please feel free to contact me at (253) 835- 2640, or Joanne.long-woods(@cityofFederalwa.v.com. Sincerely, Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner Eric: Notice Board Handout Resubmittal Information Form c: Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Ann Dower, Engineering Plans Review Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water District File NOS-102817-00-UP Doc I D 46442 clry OF �. Federal July 16, 2008 Mr. Matt Cyr Abbey Road Group, LLC 923 Shaw Road, Suite A Puyallup, WA 98372 CITY HALL Way 33325 8th Avenue South Mailing Address: PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Re: File #08-102818-00-SE; Notice of Incomplete Application/Request for Additional Information 201h Avenue South Heliport; 36645 20`1' Avenue South, Federal Way Dear Mr. Cyr: The Department of Community Development Services is in the process of reviewing information you submitted on behalf of the Christian Faith Center on June 11, 2008, for a proposed heliport. The project is being reviewed under the provisions of Federal Way City Code (FWCC) Chapter 20 and Chapter 22, Process IV Review. The proposed heliport landing area is located on the site of the Christian Faith Center church parking lot and is zoned Residential Multifamily (RM) 3600, with a 7,200 square foot minimum lot size and a comprehensive plan designation of Multifamily. INCOMPLETE APPLICATION/REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION During the course of the City's review, the following areas of concern were raised by department staff regarding the proposed location of the heliport. The application materials did not address some of these issues, so additional information is being requested to continue with the review process. Planning Division, Joanne Long -Woods, 253-835-2640 1. Site Plan — The site plan does not identify the total square footage of the proposed landing pad. Please place the total size and dimensions on the site plans. 2. The zoning and comprehensive plan designations are not listed on the site plans. Please add. 3. Setbacks —It appears the placement of the landing pad is located within the required 30-foot rear yard setback. Please address this issue by stating why it needs to be in this location and where an alternate location may be proposed. 4. Noise — The noise study identifies level of noise upon landing, but does not address noise levels at residential areas on approach from Interstate 5, or upon departure from church to Interstate 5. Please address impact on residential areas directly adjacent to the proposed landing pad. File#08-102818-00-SE Doc I.D. 46281 Mr. Matt Cyr Page 2 July 16, 2008 5. Safety — Since this pad will be located in an area adjacent to and designated for parking, the area needs to be secured so the helicopter can land safely and will not intrude into or create a safety concern for church attendees or employees accessing their cars near this area. Please provide a description how the area will be secured during use. Approvals — In order for this to be an allowed use in the City, the applicant must obtain the Process IV Hearing Examiner Approval, approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), provisions of a dust -free maintainable surface for the landing, and maintain adequate liability insurance. Please forward a copy of the FAA approval as soon as it is received so we can include it in the file and the packet submitted to the Hearing Examiner. Also, provide a short narrative explaining how/when the area will be maintained. Public Works, Ann Dower, Engineering Plans Review, 235-835-2732 Regarding the information provided on June 11, 2008, for a heliport facility at Christian Faith Center: • This proposal does not appear to include refueling facilities. Refueling will not be approved for this site unless specific plans for water quality protection and treatment are provided to and approved by the Public Works Department. Traffic Division, Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer, 253-835-2740 I have reviewed the submitted materials and have the following comments: • The proposal eliminates 28 parking stalls. This appears to conflict with the Traffic Management Plan (TMP) for the site. The TMP needs to be updated to demonstrate that the loss of parking can be accommodated for all approved uses on -site (not just the current uses). • Management of the space reserved for the heliport also should be demonstrated. How does the applicant intend to ensure that site circulation is not compromised, and if not permanent, how is space for the helicopter reserved? My understanding is that the definition of a heliport versus a helipad is critical in distinguishing the relative permanence of supporting facilities that may negate or heighten site circulation impacts. This needs to be clarified. Building Division, Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official, 253-835-2640 No comments on the heliport at this time. South King Fire & Rescue, Chris Ingham, Deputy Fire Marshal, 253-529-7206 The 2006International Fire Code defines helicopter landing areas as: File 908-102818-00-SE Doc. I.D. 46281 Mr. Matt Cyr Page 3 July 16, 2008 • HELIPORT. An area of land or water or a structural surface that is used, or intended for use, for the landing and taking off of helicopters and any appurtenant areas which are used, or intended for use, for heliport buildings and other heliport facilities. • HELISTOP. The same as "Heliport," except that no fueling, defueling, maintenance, repairs, or storage of helicopters is permitted. South King Fire and Rescue cannot approve the proposed landing area if it is declared a Heliport. This would allow storage of helicopters at the location, thus obstructing the fire apparatus access road. We would consider an alternative location on the site that does not obstruct fire access. Lakehaven Utility District, Brian Asbury, Engineering Technician III, 253-835-2640 Lakehaven has no comment on this issue, as based on the submittal it appears no existing and/or future Lakehaven water/sewer facilities will be required, desired, or affected by the proposed land use action. When submitting additional information, five copies of any revised plans and four copies of any report accompanied by the completed "Resubmittal Information Form" must be provided with. Pursuant to FWCC Section 22-34, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the City within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the City shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. If you have any questions about this letter or your application, please feel free to contact me at (253) 835- 2640, or joanne.lon-g-wood.s(@cilyoffederalLALay.com. cityoffederalway,com. Sincerely, 4G,Z ,,, [," ,"G7 Joanne Long -Woods, AICP Senior Planner Eric: Resubmittal Information Form c: Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Ann Dower, Engineering Plans Review Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Chris Ingham, South King Fire & Rescue Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water District File #08-102818-00-SE Doe. ID. 46281 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 16, 2008 TO: Will Appleton, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Assistant Building Official Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Utility District Chris Ingham, South King County Fire & Rescue FROM: Joanne Long -Woods FOR DRC MTG. ON: July 3, 2008 (Completeness Review) FILE NU14BER(s): 08-102817-00-UP/ 08-102818-00-SE RELATED FILE NOS.: 07-106054-00-UP PROJECT NAME: 2CH AVENUE SOUTH HELIPORT (Christian Faith Center) PROJECT ADDRESS: 33645 20th Avenue South ZONING DISTRICT: RM 3600 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Permit a private heliport as an approved use at the Christian Faith Center for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once a week. USE PERMITS: PROJECT CONTACT: Process IV Approval,SEPA Abbey Road Group, LLC Matt Cyr P.O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98372 253-435-3699 MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master land use application form; King County Assessor's parcel map Vicinity Map Legal Description of property Site photographs from each compass point Noise Evaluation Helicopter Landing Areas Map from FWCP Application to FAA SEPA Checklist DEIS from Christian Faith Center 4: �A.STER LAND USE APPLICATION E nEPAMMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South MTY OF PO Box 9718 JUN zo�8 Federal Way WA 99063-9718 Federal Way CITY253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 OF E D E RA L WAY wtivw.eitvoffederalway.com C®S APPLICATION NO(S) Project Name 2 0 TH AVE. S. UP 1 i nnri- Property Address/Location 33645 20th Ave. S _ Federal W v, WA 98 01 Parcel Number(s) 21 21 0 4 9 0 0 4 _ Project Description Permit a privaa Faith Center for air taxi pick up and/or drop off approximately once a week. PLEASE PRINT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director=s Approval) Process H (Site Plan Review) Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi-judicial Rezone_) Process VI SEPA w/Proj ect SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information RM 3600 Zoning Designation Mult i f ami lgomprehensive Plan Designation 1435,600 Value of Existing Improvements $ 0 . 0 0 _Ua'•ue of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): N / A Occupancy Type N/A Construction Type Applicant Name:Abbey Road Group, LLC / Matt Cyr Address: PO Box 207 City/State: Puyallup, WA Zip:98372 Phone: 253-435-3699 Fax: 253-446-3159 Email: matt.cyr@abbgyroadgroup.com Signature: -� - Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: Address: City/State: Zip: Phone: Fax: Email: Signature: Owner Name:Christian Faith Center Address: 33645 2 0 th Ave. S. CitylState: Fi• deral Way, WA Zip' 98003 Phone: 253-943-2492 Fax: 253-943-2493 0� �,rtrn-nke Signature: , �� Bulletin #003 —August 18, 2004 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application Abbey Road Abbey Road Group, LLC P. O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98371 T 253.435.3699 F 253.446.3159 www.abbeyroadgroup.com June 9, 2008 Greg Fewins Director Department of Community Development Services City of Federal Way 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98063 RECEIVED JUN 11 2008 CITYY OF FEDERAL WAY CDS Re: 01-104.7 — 20TH Avenue South — Private Helicopter Landing Pad Authorization Site Located at 33645 20th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA. Dear Greg: Introduction The following Type IV application for Hearing Examiner's Review is made by the Abbey Road Group, LLC on behalf of Christian Faith Center in accordance with Federal Way City Code "FWCC" Chapter 22 Article VII and the helicopter interpretation in Federal Way file number 07-106054-00-UP regarding the Christian Faith Center. The proposed heliport site was constructed along with the construction of the Christian Faith Center and this application is a use application only. The proposed heliport site is located at 33645 20th PI SW within the City of Federal Way on King County Parcel Number 212104-9004. Pre -Application Waiver Re uest Because of the extensive and recent history of this Christian Faith Center development within the City of Federal Way, we are requesting a waiver to the pre -application meeting typically required prior to submittal of an application. The site of the heliport was previously constructed during the development of the Christian Faith Center and this application is to permit the heliport use. A discussion with City Planning Staff on May 20, 2008 provided all the necessary information to prepare a, thorough application that is consistent with Federal Way City Code. Sackaround Histo As you are aware, a process for review and approval of new helicopter landing pads and touchdown pads had not been established until the Christian Faith Center review process. During this process a Heliport Interpretation was given on November 28, 2007. Christian Faith Center has in the past made use a helicopter taxi service to shuttle pastors between their south location and their north location, in Everett, between Sunday church services and religious holidays. Approval by the City is being requested for a private heliport on the Christian Faith Center site so the helicopter taxi service may continue to service the church. During the EIS process for the Christian Faith Center building, full development, and master plan the Christian Faith Center and the Abbey Road Group, LLC did state that a helicopter request was, not at that time part of the EIS process because at the time there was no requirement within the City Of Federal Way to get permission for such a use. This has now been changed since the helicopter interpretation under file # 07-106054- 00-UP has been prepared by the City of Federal Way. Description of Proiect With that history being said and the City's summary of interpretation being that, "heliports shall be an allowable use in the City of Federal Way subject to obtaining Process IV, Hearing Examiner Approval, based on certain, criteria in the development requirements" (File 07-106054-00-UP, 2007). The definition determined by the City of Federal Way of a heliport means, "an area approved for loading, landing, and takeoff of helicopters, including auxiliary facilities such as parking, waiting room, fueling, and safety and maintenance equipment" (File 07-106054-00-UP, 2007). The intent of the 20th Avenue South heliport is for the purposes of loading, landing and taking off of helicopters only. There will be no fueling, maintenance, storage and/or other items to partake as part of the heliport. The heliport is proposed to be listed as private with FAA and for the sole purposes of the Christian Faith Center, the Christian Faith Center staff, visitors of the Christian Faith Center, and by South King County Fire and Rescue for disaster mitigation. The proposed heliport, as stated above, will be for private periodic use, primarily on Sunday mornings during inclement weather, during the church's peak holiday season, and when traffic slowdowns on 15 prevent the efficient transport of church pastors and very important guests between the Federal Way site and other approved heliports for presentations, preaching, and important meetings. Christian Faith Center does not own a helicopter at this time but instead makes use of local helicopter taxi services to provide transport to and from the 20th Avenue South site. Decision Criteria As stated in the City's interpretation and in addition to the criteria contained in FWCC Chapter 22 article VII a request for heliport shall meet specific criteria. The following are the specific criteria with the Abbey Road Group, LLC responses in Bold: 1. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Response: Chapter 3.7 Aviation of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan (FWCP) specifically addresses heliports and helicopter transportation within the City limits. Currently there are 12 helicopter operators based in the City according to the FWCP with several heliports. They serve several purposes, the purpose that the 20'" Avenue South heliport will serve is "1) Business operations, associated with corporate activity and air taxi services" (FWCP, 2003). It is also foreseeable that this heliport could be used for disaster mitigation which is identified as an important in the FWCP. The City had a Helicopter Master Plan prepared to serve as a guide for goals and policies in the FWCP. The Helicopter Master Plan produced a map of existing heliport sites in the City and a map of potential heliport locations; both maps have been included with this submittal. The ,"proposed site is within the area most compatible for heliport development. The proposed site is also within approximately 1,500 feet from a recommended heliport site. Therefore, this proposal is consistent with the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. 2. It is consistent with all applicable provisions of this chapter and all other applicable laws. Response: This proposal is consistent with the applicable provisions of Chapter 22 of the Federal Way Municipal Code (FWMC) and the policies established in the Heliport Interpretation of file number 07-106054-00-UR 3. It is consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Response: The proposal will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety and welfare. The proposed site is within 2,500 feet of three existing heliports and within 1,500 feet of a Comprehensive Plan recommended heliport site. The proposed site is located adjacent to 1-5, which serves as a helicopter flight corridor for the region, and the proposed site will not require a helicopter to fly over residential housing to access the heliport which would reduce impacts to the surrounding public. The' use of this site for disaster mitigation in the event of a regional disaster would also serve would be benefit to the public. Finally, the relatively low volume of landings and take offs per week, approximately one, would also indicate this proposal has no or negligible impact on the public health, safety and welfare. 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal. Response: This proposal will not utilize the streets and utilities in the area; therefore they are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal: 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration for access. Response: The street access to the helipad is not relevant, but the air and flight corridor access is relevant to the subject property. This proposed heliport site is located with the most compatible area for heliport development according to the FWCP and is adjacent to 1-5, which serves as a regional helicopter flight path. - The subject property is ideal for helipad development because helicopters can access the heliport from 1-5 without flying over residential areas. The presence of three additional heliports within 2,500 feet future indicates the sites optimal location for heliport development and optimal helicopter access. 6. The type of aircraft permitted to use an approved heliport, the number of daily take offs and landings, hours of operation and auxiliary facilities shall not adversely affect the surrounding area. Response: The proposed heliport will support the landing and take off of a helicopter on Sundays, religious holidays, and other important events. The heliport and helicopter will support the transportation of staff members, pastors, visiting pastors and visiting speakers in regards to their transportation between the Christian Faith Center- Federal Way Campus, the Christian Faith Center- Everett Campus, and other heliport locations. The largest helicopter anticipated at this time would be a 5 passenger helicopter such as the Eurochoper A Star or Bell Jet Ranger. The flight operation is proposed on Sundays, during religious holidays, and other important events, and will commence no- earlier than 9:00 AM on a given day and end no later than 5:00 PM on a given day. The average number of take offs and landings per week will be one. Air taxi service is likely to be provided by Classic Helicopters Corp. operating out of Boeing Field and an FAA approved air taxi operator. There will be no auxiliary fueling, maintenance, or services performed at the 20t' Avenue South heliport site. All helicopter operations will be in accordance with Federal Aviation Administrative (FAA) policies and procedures and are not anticipated to adversely affect the surrounding area. 7. Helicopter shall have direct flight path access to 1-5 and the flight path shall not be located over any adjacent residential zone property. Response: The 20th Avenue South Heliport abuts 1-5 to the east and has direct access to the 1-5 flight corridor. The 201h Avenue South heliport is also within the City of Federal Way's Recommended Heliport Site Area Comprehensive Plan Map. All helicopter flight paths will be via 1-5 to and from the 201h Avenue South Heliport where the helicopter will approach the heliport from the east and depart the heliport to the east. At no time will helicopters fly over residential zoned properties within the City of Federal Way not owned by the Christian Faith Center. Please see the proposed flight path exhibit for more information. Conditions of approval: The following conditions shall apply prior to operating any approved helicopter. 1. Documentation of approved by the Federal Aviation Administration to utilize the subject site as a helipad shall be provided to the city. Response: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has a notification process for identifying new heliport site locations. Currently the FAA, reviews flight patterns for safety and approves heliport locations, except in restricted areas. These approvals are reviewed at the regional level. The Abbey Road Group, LLC will provide FAA recognition of the helipad location and flight path to the City of Federal Way prior to City approval. 2. Surface of the helipad shall consist of dust free maintainable surface. Response: The surface is asphalt and therefore meets the criteria for a dust free maintainable surface. 3. The operation of the helicopter shall remain with adequate liability insurance as deemed appropriate by the use type and location. The City of Federal Way shall be named as an additional insured party. Response: The Christian Faith Center will use FAA approved air taxi operators with adequate liability insurance for air taxi service. The City of Federal Way will be insured in the same way that they are insured under other helicopter operator's policies in City, such as South King County Fire and Rescue, Law Enforcement, and other private helicopter operators. Submittal Materials With this letter, we are submitting the following information, as outlined in the heliport interpretation and the FWCC Chapter 22 Article VI to support this application: • Cover Letter and Criteria Response (4 Copies) ■ Master Land Use Application (1 Copy) • 20th Avenue South Vicinity Map Packet (4 Copies) • King County Assessor's Parcel Map (1 Copy) • Title Report (2 Copies) • 20th Avenue South Site Legal Description (1 Copy) ■ 20th Avenue South Heliport Plan Set (6 Copies) • SEPA Checklist (6 Copies) • Noise Study by Optimum Environment (4 Copies) • 20th Avenue South Heliport Site Photo Packet (4 Copies) • City of Federal Way Comprehensive Helicopter Landing Areas, Transportation Element map 111-23 (4 Copies) • City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan recommended siting areas map 111-24 (4 Copies) • Helicopter Interpretation by City of Federal Way File # 07-106054-00-UP (4 Copies) • SeaTac International Airport Air Navigation Chart (4 Copies) + FAA Notice of Landing Area Proposal Application (4 Copies) Mailing List and Map (1 Copy) • Mailing Envelopes (3 Sets) • Application Fees We understand that the enclosed information is sufficient to determine this type IV process application to be complete for processing and look forward to receiving a Notice of Complete Application within 28 days. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, Matt Cyr r Land Development Planner / Project Manager Enclosures cc: Christian Faith Center 20thPlace Southwest Heliport Proposal DT82 91,12 01,08, 0035 DODO 022D DWI[) alca 0228 2 '1,04,91004 g02-6. DO70 90041 go 03 9068 Federal Way oom 9072. 9080 9-02,4 9041 Ion 41047 06 9061 9085 9051 0144) 01,20 S 341ST PL 9052 DOM DOW 9W3 9137 91002 9DI 7 9007 9021 OUYIIY :gO.T 300 Foot Boundary Map 20t" Place Southwest Heli Vicinity Map osal 011 131 Abbey Road 20t" Place Southwest Heliport Proposal Regional Map AbbeyRoad 20t" Place Southwest Heliport Proposal ALight Poles t I Trees Obstructions Map Abbey Road ta�.sFederal:Way;,VLlA� r :: 1, ' SouShr3Gih}Si ,� S e Sireat � i � �.- ,i 1 �7 MIN ny a .- f. 'i 1 �rt . •DUMB One Mile Radius Sa�'tEir th�Sli_ ce1 ` } .� Bgt-6th+Strte J. i .•...fir 02009-'.cnDm° .f' _ •.,.z - �� r'e",B Googic 47•17'49.52"N 122"18'33'42" W etev�A,i_4+;m �rz. --. Nvv_'-0.2007 Eye alt S 67 km C1 • • • - • _ _ . AbbeyRoad RECEIVED JUN 11 Z008 �es� ,91f Kent City of Federal Way CITY 0- jgD ,�►L w�►� Moines 52 a Comprehensive Plan CDSP°vL''�' Star °�� ''�� Landing BayHelicopter Areas S 243 Transportation Element .5 Divinas y Federal T Legend: Ba-v �is Way Federal Way City Limits 04 In L-uslei- Steel Dollof Luke• 1_ I Potential Annexation Area 99 ¢' Lake Lake Q Fly Wright Company Landing Area 312thSl 312thSt N Federal way Fly Wright Company Landing Area lvo 0 i•l„ Lake 1 P.A.A. 0 335th St Medical Transfer Point SS 3 plh $( S 2 h S 7� — yo Federal 10 N a d Fire Station #6 (Emergency) Way a {�f N S 324th St r A'u g e - © 272nd St. Park and Ride (Emergency) rt a 0 Thomas Jefferson High (Emergency) k °ate 1, st 7$ �� ID Twin Lakes Golf Course (Emergency) r N �' o Federal Way High School (Emergency) • m Ta °ma a r a y � i 0 Woodmont Elementary (Emergency) a 48 h 51 a p Luke q Gelrevo Weyerhaeuser Corporate Landing Area w 3s 99 Federal rrr Green Gables Elementary (Emergency) w Way r P.A.A. ® Fire Station #3 (Emergency) + o Z N © a ¢ Five r _ Scale: r, o• J. 4�� t Adile Luke ' 0 0.5 1 MBrh�L A ' N Miles 'rpf� �'� rn i I !i•ou! - Map Reformatted: October, 2006. Source: City of Federal Way, King County Of Milton �' Federal Way MAP III-23 ( " Ed a Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. 20t" Place Southwest Heliport Proposal SP� Proposed Heliport Location IL} Y A It• Site Photo Looking South 20t" Place Southwest Heliport Proposal Proposed Heliport Location _ i r T7t L Site Photo Looking West L in Road 0 s a fit.. •. • , �py� s .! �• .y. Y .off. .Y iR4iWOM '. _rf ,.O y!••.. y•.i tip•. .y•, F, µ, fi Ilk. ' r� :� 'i `' icy' ''�'- � i� �•� Road ltj �L AbbeyRoad 20t" Place Southwest Heliport Proposal Site Photo Looking West RE'ED JUN 11 2008 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY C®S SeaTac International Airport Air Navigation Chart Job # 01-104.7 June 9, 2008 Abbey Road Group, LLC P. O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98371 T 253.435.3699 F 253.446.3159 www.abbeyroadgroup.com May 22, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Seattle ADO Attn: Paul Holmquist 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Suite 250 Renton, WA 98057 RECEIVED JUN 11 Z008 CITY CF F DEAL WAY CDs RE: 01-104.7, Christian Faith Center Heliport, Notice of Landing Area Proposal Dear Mr. Holmquist: With this letter and accompanying information, The Abbey Road Group, LLC is submitting a Notice of Landing Area Proposal for the proposed Christian Faith Center heliport located within the City of Federal Way, Washington. The project proposes a heliport in a constructed asphalt area 99 feet by 93 feet south of the newly constructed Christian Faith Center located within the City of Federal Way. More specifically, the project is located at 33645 201h Ave. S. on King County Tax Parcel Number 212104-9004. This property contains a newly constructed sanctuary, parking lot, drainage facility, and playfield. The property is generally surrounded by commercial business with small pockets of single-family residential development to the south and north. With the letter, we are submitting the following information, as outlined in the Notice of Landing Area Proposal: Notice of Landing Area Proposal (1 copy) Site Plan (11 x 17 inch 1 copy) City Map/Vicinity Map (1 copy) • Obstructions Map (1 copy) ■ School, Church and Residential Area Map (1 copy) • Site Photos (1 copy) We understand that the enclosed information is sufficient to determine this Notice of Landing Area Proposal application to be complete for processing. If you need further information, or wish to discuss this project in detail, please contact me immediately; otherwise we look forward to receiving approval in the near future. �Sincerely, Matt Cyr Land Development Planner / Project Manager Enclosures cc: Christian Faith Center City of Federal Way Forrn aonroved OMB No. 2120-0036 U.S.DepadmanlofiransWitalion NOTICE OF LANDING AREA PROPOSAL Federal Aviation Adminlstuilton Name of Proponent, Individual, or Organization Address of Proponent, Individual, or Organization Christian Faith Center (No., Street, City, State, Zip Code) 33645 20th Ave. S. ❑Check if the property owner's name and address are different than above, Federal Way, WA 98003 and list property owner's name and address on the reverse. Establishment or Activation ❑ Deactivation or abandonment ) OF ❑ Airport Uitralight Flightpark [IVertiport Alteration ❑ Change of Status XX Heliport ❑ Seaplane Base ❑ Other (Specify) A. Location of Landing Area :I. Associated City/State 2. County/State (Physical Location of Airport) 3. Distance and Direction From Federal Way King, Washington Associated City or Town 4. Name of Landing Area 5. Latitude 6. Longitude 7. Elevation Miles I Direction Christian Faith Center Heliport 47° 1 17` J 53" -12201831" 374 NGVD Within City Within City B. Purpose Type Use If Change of Status or Alteration, Describe Change XX Construction Dates To Begin/Began Est. Completion ❑ Public N/A Establishment or XX Private ❑ Private Use of Public change to traffic pattern (Describe on reverse) Already Already Constructed Constructed Land/Waters Ref. A5 above D. Landing -Area Data Existing if an Proposed Direction Distance 1. Airport, Seaplane Base, or Flightpark Rwy #1 Rwy #2 Rwy #3 Rwy Rwy Rwy C. Other Landing Areas From Landing Area From Landing Area Magnetic Bearing of Runway (s) or Sealane (s) NIA N/A SE 0.5 mi Length of Runway (s) or Sealane (s) in NIA N/A Weyerhaeuser Corp. Feet 335th St. Medical Transfer E 0.4 mi Width of Runway (s) or Sealane (s). in N/A N/A Point Feet Fly Wright Co. Landings SW & 0.8 & Type of Runway Surface N/A N/A SW 1.7 mi (Concrete, Asphalt Tun, Etc.) 2. Heliport Federal Way High School NW 2.6 mi Dimensions of Final Approach and Take 275' x 136' N/A Fire Station # 3 & 6 W & 2.4 & NW 2.7 mi off Area (FATO) in Feet Auburn Airport NE 4.3 mi Dimensions of Touchdown and Lift -Off 99' x 93' NIA Area TLOF in Feet Magnetic Direction of Ingress/Egress Routes N/A East NIA SeaTac International Airport N 9.0 mi E. Obstructions Direction From Landing Area Distance From Landing Area Type yp Height Above Landing Area Type of Surface (Turf, concrete, rooftop, etc.) Asphalt Trees 80, S & E 18' & 3. All I Description of Lighting (If any) Direction of Prevailing Wind 803, Landing Areas I No Heliport Lighting Proposed North and South F. Operational Data Building 40' N 43' Power Lines 125' N 5000' 1. Estimated or Actual Number Based Aircraft Light Poles 30' E & W 110' & ,4irport, Present Anticipated Heliport Present Anticipated 66' IFlightpark, (If est indicate 5 Years (If est indicate by 5 Years !Seaplane base by letter E" Hence letter "E" Hence Light Poles 30' N 37' IMulti-engine Un°er3500tbs. mgw 0 0 Radio Towner 100, S 830' Single -engine over 3500 lbs. MGW 0 0 Glider Cell Tower 1 40' S 1720' G. Other Considerations Direction From Landing Area Distance From Landing Area 2. Average Number Monthly Landings Present I Anticipated Present Anticipated ( ( If est indicate 5 Years If y est indicate b 5 Years b latter `E" Hence letter E") Hence Identification Church of Jesus Chris LDS SE 0.9 mi •Jet Helicopter 5E 5E Underwater Sports SW 0.5 mi Turboprop Ultralight Panther Lake Elementary SW 1.2 mi Prop I Glider 3. Are IFR Procedures For the Airport Anticipated Residential N 0.2 mi Residential S 35' XX No ❑Yes Within Years Type Navaid: H. Application for Airport Licensing ❑ Has Been Made ❑ Not Required County XX Will Be Made ❑ State ❑ Municipal Authority I. CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby certify that all of the above statements made by me are complete to the best f my knos'vled e Name, title (and address if different than above) of person filing Signature (in ' this notice —type or print Date of Signature May 22, 2008 1 a ephon o. (Precede with area code) 253-446-3507 Abbey Road Group LLC, Attn: Matt Cyr / Project Manager, PO Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98371 FAA Form 7480-1 (1-93) Supersedes Previous Edition CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER SEC. 21/TV11P. 21 N./RGE. 4E.,W.M. HELICOPTER AREA GRAPHIC SCALE +r WETLAND 'A' - CATEGORY II - 12,187.30 SF - WETLAND BUFFER TO BE REMOVED = 11.262.29 SF - WETLAND BUFFER TO BE ADDED = 20.083.05 SF WETLAND 'B' - CATEGORY II - 54.972.70 SF - WETLAND TO BE ADDED - 5.200.00 SF - WETLAND BUFFER TO BE ADDED = 20.419.00 SF WETLAND 'C' — CATEGORY III — 3,762.39 SF — WETLAND TO BE REMOVED = 3,76239 SF — WETLAND BUFFER TO BE REMOVED = 8,425.30 SF KEY CODE: WETLAND .. WETLAND BUFFER ® WETLAND MITIGATION AREA BUFFER REPLACEMENT MITIGATION KEY STONE RETAINING WALL c COMPACT STALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED D BUS SHELTERS 2 0 5 03 0 E E Ui 2 C7 m O 07 0 r F L c U Q O a LL O N C .CL �= CD cB (n (D � = ILL L- U A U co n J E 0 �U o rLn V N�co Q LL N CD a) Q C ca J 0) �Lo Q 00 m rn� ��Q:3 U) m QLcol ¢'cm Q X a a EL Q J CO N Ch XO Inc,) LL m a: v PROPOSED HELIPORT PAD SCALE N T 'S) Christian Faith Center Notice of Landing Area Proposal City Map Christian Faith Center Notice of Landing Area Proposal �— -- - ` i rees Obstructions Map in Way,Y11VA'� 4 9 ] ' "�Z 5'oulhh32Ctt]S:re�ew' r 1'• � S.ou[hwantr32'It 4IStrect . i.J �` � � �•_•_ { � ; � �• s-, �— �_ "W�.. i v.. ��<• .yti� J' •t. tier •ilr: Ml I r � �+ �,• �y i f .i• .�• � �-T•.� fry, s Latitude"I rii � •�� ! OR Ingress/Egress Routes To 1-5 Corridor y ! I. a hL3 8lh t eat —l. s•ul 73i91 M1i51r!•` ! r . } i� � lid . ='+• w--.� � 4"9 , . � •�-,,.r - _ r i' ,}, _ - J ter- Sth tpr 008 Tal ,Alas 47'17'49.92- N 122`18'33 d2" W ^1 s - 81e e�1s13m �� T- � Hov 9, 2007 Eya nil 6 67 Hm j I L1 -41 iQL Vx _ Christian Faith Center Notice of Landing Area Proposal Site Photo Looking West '.� � •err• - - ti` F -��• ;Y �� ' Proposed Heliport Locatio r Jy� ems" �,� �_ ��.' :a:r'�-. ." .. .,. .. 'tj►'�yr s, I tier' ..*• WW '•. "�.. -•, y�J? S,. ��"�.� -r"i �.-'. ¢fir_ .r "- {: t . >. - .s! ref-.*tk_. _ ,>`!• l: ' •a4 6 y yr � r.S L.• `r'k. �'[,'�" !'Ar y{� qtv A.�^-"' .i yi �]��j/�"_=��• 'M,': �t '-.:� :.ilk � `•� -f 'y Y`yv r _ _. _*•iw=man.:•--� __.�_ .. _ + _ -- " � N , rd a k• -- _ J �' Wit• -- pf_+. Christian Faith Center Notice of Landing Area Proposal Site Photo Looking West ► g o ' � Optimum Environment A Division of OE Enterprises, Inc PO Box 14712 Mill Creek, W►4 98082 Tel (425) 391-8292 www.optimumenvironment.com E-mail Errol@optimumenvironment.com Noise Evaluation REcPIVE& 20th Ave S. Heliport JUN 1 120®8 The Abbey (toad Group '� FEDERAL WAy CDS PO Box 201 Puyallup, WA 98373 Introduction The Christian Faith Center (CFC) recently constructed a church near Kitts Corner located south of S. 336th St at the intersection with 20th Ave S. in Federal Way, WA (See Figure 1). The area surrounding the site is a mix of residential and commercial uses. Figure 2 shows the site and environs including adjacent land uses and parking areas. The heliport is located at the south end of the CFC. Interstate 5 is located approximately 1400 feet east of the heliport landing area and Pacific Highway S is located approximately 1000 feet west of the landing area. A permit application has been submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration to authorize a heliport landing area immediately south of the CFC. Projected use of the heliport is one (1) trip per week between 10:30 and 11:00 AM to transport the minister to another church. Projected approach and egress are to the east and thence northerly along the Interstate 5 corridor. The proposal is to determine the noise impacts of a helicopter landing and takeoff event at the site boundary adjacent to the heliport. 20t" Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation This noise evaluation will: 1) Summarize a set of noise measurements taken to determine existing noise levels at the site boundary adjacent to the heliport landing area and the sources of noise. 2) Identify existing sources of noise on and adjacent to the site. 3) Determine the added noise impact of a helicopter landing and takeoff to the existing noise levels at the time when an event is supposed to occur. 4) Determine compliance with noise limitations as promulgated by Washington State statutes and administrative code (WAC 173-60) as referenced by the City of Federal Way in Chapter 22-956. Noise Regulations and Interpreting Measurements Applicable Noise Regulations Noise regulations applicable to the site are codified in WAC 173-60, which has been adopted by reference by the City of Federal Way, WA, The maximum permissible noise levels from WAC 173-60 are summarized in Table I below: Table I Noise Limitations EDNA* OF NOISE SOURCE EDNA OF RECEIVING PROPERTY CLASS A CLASS B CLASS C RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL A - RESIDENTIAL 55 57 60 B - COMMERCIAL 57 60 65 C - INDUSTRIAL 60 65 70 *Environmental Designation for Noise Abatement (based on Land Use and Zoning) Optimum Environment 2 June 9, 2008 20t' Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation Between the hours or 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM the limitations of the above table shall be reduced by 10 dBA for the receiving property for residential (Class A) zones. These noise levels may be exceeded on the receiving property for any one hour day or night as follows: 15 dBA for 1.5 minutes; Approximately equivalent to L2.5. 10 dBA for 5 minutes; Approximately equivalent to L8.3. 5 dBA for15 minutes; Approximately equivalent to L25. These regulations exempt a wide range of noise sources on both public and private property from the noise limitations in Table I. Exemptions include, but are not limited to: vehicles, trains, aircraft (helicopters are included as aircraft) and natural sources. A comprehensive list of exemptions to the noise limitations can be found in WAC 173-60. Religious facilities where the property is not used for human habitation are classified as Class B EDNA. Therefore, under the applicable noise regulations and definitions, and the existing land uses the noise limitations are 60 dBA at the site south EDNA boundary. Interpreting Measurements and Correlating with Regulations Today's integrating sound level meters measure noise energy and total noise exposure, and the noise metrics used correlate with but are not directly representative of the limitations described in Table I above. The standard noise metric used by today's integrating meters is the L descriptor, which is a statistical description of the noise energy exceeded a specified percentage of the time. Lmax is the highest and Lmin the lowest sound levels observed during the measurement period. Leq is the average sound energy level observed during the measurement period. The measurements taken with the digital noise meter directly measure and record Lmax, Lmin and Leq. When the 5, 10 and 15 dBA allowable noise exce ncesjin the regulations shown in Table I are factored into a one hour measurement period - as noise energy - the Leq limitation measured by the noise meter associated with an EDNA limitation in the regulations is several dB higher than the limitation (60 dBA) shown in Table I. Measurement periods can be of any duration from a few seconds to several hours. For this noise evaluation, a one -hour measurement was used to properly integrate the single -event helicopter noise into the existing ambient noise from nearby traffic, aircraft overflights from Optimum Environment 3 June 9, 2008 20t" Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation Sea-Tac airport and other sources of noise occurring on and off the site. The recorded noise levels are reasonably representative of hourly Leq noise levels at the EDNA boundary during the expected helicopter event on a Sunday morning. Rather than attempting to incorporate the exceedances shown in Table I; for purposes of this report if the total noise Leq is less than the 60 dBA limitation at the commercial/commercial EDNA (property) boundary then the site is considered to be in compliance with the noise regulations, even though the aircraft noise being evaluated is exempt. Measured Noise Levels Noise measurements were taken on Sunday June 1, 2008 between 9:30 and 10:30 AM. Weather was overcast with winds 2-4 mph and the temperature was about 50 degrees F. Noise measurements were taken with Quest Soundpro SE/DL Type II integrating noise meter and data logger set on slow response with windscreen attached and calibrated prior to and after the measurements. The noise meter was calibrated to 110.0 dBA prior to the measurements, and recalibrated at 110.0 dBA at the conclusion of measurements. Noise measurement location is shown in Figure 2 and is located at the site south boundary site about 75 feet from the projected helicopter touchdown point. The Leq for the one -hour measurement period was 56.8 dBA, the Lmax was 67.3 and the Lmin was 53 dBA. Appendix A shows the logged data, statistics and exceedances. Primary sources of noise were from vehicles on Interstate 5 and Pacific Highway S, and flyovers (16) from outbound aircraft originating at Sea-Tac airport. Local on -site vehicles made a smaller contribution to the noise levels. A car alarm went off from a vehicle parked on the south side of the church and in direct line of site with the noise meter, lasting about a minute near the end of the measurement period. Noise Levels from the Helicopter Event Figure 3 shows the noise footprint from a helicopter approach and landing. Based on the information from the air taxi service - Classic Helicopter Co - the footprint represents the largest aircraft that is anticipated to land at the heliport. Optimum Environment 4 June 9, 2008 20th Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation In this specific case, the helicopter would approach the site travelling southbound over Interstate 5 (See Figure 4). It would turn west to the landing area. Noise levels would be audible for about 30 seconds during descent and landing increasing from background - about 55 dBA - to 72 dBA upon touchdown, as measured at the south boundary (see Figure 3). The helicopter would idle for up to a minute as the minister boarded, and the takeoff would be the reverse of the touchdown. After lift off the helicopter would proceed east to Interstate 5 and then turn north, with noise levels decreasing from 72 dBA at lift off to 55 dBA background over about 30 seconds. Based on the event time and noise levels described above, the addition of the a single helicopter event is predicted to increase the one -hour Leq noise level from 56.7 dBA to 57.8 dBA. The total noise level from all sources - exempt and nonexempt - would remain below the 60 dBA noise limitation shown in Table I. The maximum noise level from the event is expected to 72 dBA, up from the measured 67.8 dBA maximum for Sea-Tac aircraft overflights. Findings 1. The site is presently occupied by the recently constructed Christian Faith Center. There is on -site noise produced by cars of parishioners parking to attend Sunday services. 2. Based on measurements on the site existing noise levels were measured at 56.7 dBA Leq. Traffic on Interstate 5 and Pacific Highway S, and aircraft in the SeaTac flight patterns are the dominant contributors to noise measured on the site. 3. The City of Federal Way has adopted by reference the State Noise limitations (WAC 173-60). 4. The narrow range between maximum noise levels of 67.8 dBA (aircraft flyover) and the minimum noise levels of 53 dBA show there are constant diffused sources of noise (primarily traffic) that permeate the entire area, both on and offsite. 5. The addition of a helicopter event is predicted to increase the one -hour Leq noise level from 56.7 dBA to 57.8 dBA. The total noise at the measurement site is still below the 60 dBA noise limitations described in the regulations. Optimum Environment 5 June 9, 2008 20th Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation 6. The duration of the helicopter event is expected to be two minutes or less. Although the increase in overall noise levels from the helicopter event is small, the landing and take -off will be audible and noticeable to those in the vicinity when it occurs. The maximum noise level in the area is expected to be about 72 dBA, at touchdown and take -off. Conclusion The site is located in a generally noisy environment created primarily by traffic and jet aircraft flyovers from SeaTac airport. Noise from traffic on the site during Sunday services sources makes a lesser contribution to measured levels on the site. The addition of a single helicopter event with a duration of under two minutes will increase total hourly noise levels slightly (about 1 dBA), and will be audible and noticeable to those present in the vicinity when it occurs. Total noise levels remain within the regulations promulgated by the City of Federal Way. Prepared by Errol Nelson P.E. Expires 2/11/10 Optimum Environment 6 June 9, 2008 1%.At UL7%,l V%,l 1111Q6%: Vlll LbDy Vl Llll, V17V 1J 1 U�\.• 1 VL 1 Send To Printer Back To TerraServer Change to 11x17 Print Size Sho,v Grd Lines Change to Landscape XUSGS Federal Way, Washington, United States 01 Jul 1994 will 0,7 yid ■ �� I --� ■ 1 l y� k � I r � i � � � � r R i ... L I TY Ctdl'Fi a_w'Y*`�f .' ■ ARK } .. Ki r '�■�:w: ■ ate.—�� 79A ry 776 t . 1' _ I Y I�, ,all 4 r - $—i�.V.".—....;«y..p r.r�e• .^.1MI�T'.r""�l"" •V'„ t 3 �• _ r - �+��""'� _ • J F I1 1 ' • 1 ' f E l ' 'Y - '� - ,141 1 i 1p Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey G 2004 Microsoft Corporation. Terms c-4' kfsa Priv:vcir t��temed�e FIG U . http://terraselver-usa. com/PrintImage.aspx?T=2&S=12&Z,=10&X=690&Y= �' CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER SEC. 211TWP. 21 NJRGE. 4E.,W.M, HELICOPTER AREA W` uj tee'=A� xn eo •�• - ciuoiri u -�rID : ✓� -YMW Na ii ems Kam. 'Ycfry •1vv�Y-u�Wlro. oArYta V� - _ io NTOrKel rnrW�i0.r�icf V n Kiwpa cw�m�"�ro crosanim'r'�a naco 0 Aauw � xuw rnrunri �w _ memY nr�iti awu . rKl •rr4 Y cRG�10 [�^_ R••.irS w U 10 li t N aw �S ry z fi F--I C) c T 77 AS%A:i jqeYiCCrpter� A Textron Company Noise Footp�i►i 80 Ff E�.R APPROACH AND LANDR40 P5104"ILI< 250 FT 0 1118A V- LWATION CITY CEMR URBAN SHOPPING E MAN RESICENTIAL I 5 2�D SECONDS Christian Faith Center Notice of Landing Area Proposal City Map FIGURE Appendix A 20th Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation Information Panel Name 20th Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation Location South Boundary - Christian Faith Center Federal Way Site Comments Meter located at south boundary adjacent to heliport location Name 20th Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation Start Time Sunday, June 01, 2008 09:29:58 Stop Time Sunday, June 01, 2008 10:30:16 User Name Optimum Environment General Data Panel Description Meter/Sensor Value Description Meter/Sensor Value Dose 1 6 % Lpk 1 84.9 dB Lmax 1 67.3 dB Weighting 1 A Response 1 SLOW Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 1 3 dB Integrating Threshold 1 10 dB Log Rate 1 5 s Exchange Rate 2 3 dB Integrating Threshold 2 80 dB Weighting 2 C Response 2 FAST Logged Data Chart 90.0 81.0 72.0 63'0 54.0 45,0 36.0 27.0 18.0 9.0 0.0 09:30:03 61112008 111114 wilma'WAIM M %. '). I M. 3 9 wit if . . . . . . . . ..... 09:45:05 61112008 M Leq-1 U Lpk 1 10:00:08 61112008 Date/Time Lmax-1 Lavg-2 10:15:10 10:30:13 61112008 61112008 Q Lpk2 1 Information Panel 20th Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation Name 20th Ave S. Heliport Noise Evaluation Start Time Sunday, June 01, 2008 09:29:58 Stop Time Sunday, June 01, 2008 10:30:16 Device Model Type SoundPro DL Comments Meter located at site south boundary adjacent to heliport location General Data Panel Description Meter/Sensor Value Description Meter/Sensor Value Leq 1 56.7 dB Exchange Rate 1 3 dB Weighting 1 A Response 1 SLOW Bandwidth 1 OFF Exchange Rate 2 3 dB Weighting 2 C Response 2 FAST Statistics Chart 30.0 27.0 24,0 21.0 18.0 ip 15.0 12.0 9.0 6.0 3.0 0.0 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 dB Statistics Table (113 0 it 17, I 0.2 03 0." U : 0.6 07 0.8 0.9 71 SRO 1111 it Il Rfl 0.1) 0.11 11,11 ii 0 0.0 [I E' 5j] 0.0 51.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 [].0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.0 0.0 0.0 an 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 12 54.0 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 12 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.6 2A 14.9 55.0 23 12S 2.7 3.4 3.7 14 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.7 29.9 56.0 2.4 2.6 1.8 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.3 24.8 57.0 2.3 '_.2 2.2 1.9 15 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 15.9 58.0 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 OS 0.5 6.1 59.0 0.4 0.4 03 03 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 3.2 60.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.7 61.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 12 62.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 63.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 64.0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 65.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 66.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 67.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 0.11 11.11 IW ILO U.0 0-0 IM, It() 0.11 0.0 0.0 69.0 &0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 -p-` 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 Exceedance Table 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 0% 62.3 612 60.7 611 559.7 59.4 59.1 59.9 58.7 10Cb 58.5 583 58.2 58.1 51 57.9 57.8 57.7 57.6 575 20% 57.5 57.4 57.4 57.3 57.3 57.2 57.2 57.1 57.1 57.1 30 r4, 57.D 57.0 56.9 56.9 56.8 56.8 56.8 56.7 56.7 56.7 40h 56.6 56.6 56.6 56.5 56.5 56.4 56.4 56.4 56.3 56.3 50% 56.2 56.2 56.1 56.1 56.0 56.0 56.0 55.9 55.9 55.9 60% 55.8 55.8 55.8 55.7 55.7 55.7 55.6 55.6 55.6 55.6 70% 55.5 555 55.5 55.4 55A 55A 55.4 55.3 55.3 55.3 80% 55.2 55.2 55.1 55.1 550 55.0 55.0 54.9 54.9 54.8 90% 54.8 54.8 547 54.6 54.6 54.5 54.4 54 3 54.2 54.11 100% 53.0 2 Abbey Read Abbey Road Group, LLC P. O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 96371 T 253:435.3699 F 253.446.3159 vj wr.abbqraadgroLp.com September 4, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Seattle ADO Attn Paul Holmquist 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Suite 250 Renton, WA 98057 RE: 2008-ANM-358-NRA, 20`h Avenue South Helistop, Revised Notice of Landing Area Proposal, ARG Job Number 04-104-7 Dear Mr. Holmquist: With this letter and accompanying information, The Abbey Road Group, LLC is submitting a Revised Notice of Landing Area Proposal for the proposed 2& Avenue South Helistop, formerly the Christian Faith Center heliport, located within the City of Federal Way, Washington. The revised proposal resolves inspector objections and was supported by inspector Chip Peterson during a site meeting. The project proposes a helistop on an existing turf field area with a marked FATO of 64 feet by 64 feet east of the newly constructed Christian Faith Center located within the City of Federal Way. More specifically, the project is located at 33645 20`h Ave. S. on King County Tax Parcel Number 212104-9003. This property contains a newly constructed sanctuary, parking tot, drainage facility, and playfield. The property is generally surrounded by commercial business with small pockets of residential development to the south and north. With the letter, we are submitting the following information, as outlined in the Notice of Landing Area Proposal: Revised Notice of Landing Area Proposal (1 copy) ® Determination of Objectionable Landing Area Proposal Dated July 14, 2008 (1 copy) ® Site Plan (11 x 17 inch 1 copy) ® City MapNicinity Map (1 copy) ® Obstructions Map (1 copy) ® School, Church and Residential Area Map (1 copy) Site Photos (1 copy) We understand that the enclosed 1*rmatien is sufficient to determine this Revised Notice of Landing Area Proposal application to be complete for pracessina. If you need Further information, or wish to discuss this project in detail, please contact me immediately; otherwise we look forward to receiving approvAfih tho near future. Sincerely, Matt Cyr Y Land Development Planner 1 Project [Manager Enclosures. cc: Christian Faith Center City of Federal Way 20TH AVE S. SEC. 21/TWP. 21 NJRGE. 4E.,W,M. HELIPORT AREA I ur, s .1 \ I Ij I / GRMIII� � � (0 = a � c> a a Q m c Z ro O Y M ao C C7 Q J V J E WNG t� ErwL O � 0 S.- xis I 2OTH AVE S. SEC. 211T wE 2 &ram E 4E; k HELIF!onT * 0 §{� • ^§ X�zx 2 c (�\f § E 2 \/ 00 \jt# ) > 'A X £ A §ef/ )r City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan Recommended Heliport Siting Areas Transportation Element Legend: Q Federal Way City Limits L _ i Potential Annexation Area 0 Site Number Most Compatible for Heliport Development E LINED JUN 11 2008 CITY Ci- FEDERAL WX Scale: CDS 0 0.5 1 N I Miles Map Reformatted: October, 2006. Source: City of Federal Way, King County Federal Way MAP 111-24 Note: This map is intended for use as a graphical representation only. The City of Federal Way makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Land A m erC Commonwealth Abbey Road Group 923 Shaw Road #A P.O. Box 207 Puyallup, WA 98372 REFERENCE NO: 01-104.7/Christian Faith Center Order No.: 40017594 Liability: Charge: Tax: Total: SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE $10,000.00 $ 400.00 $ 36.00 $ 436.00 Subject to the Exclusions from Coverage, the limits of liability and other provisions of the Conditions and Stipulations hereto annexed and made a part of this Guarantee, and subject to the further exclusion and limitation that no guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the identity of any party named or referred to in Schedule A or with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown therein. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company a corporation herein called the Company, GUARANTEES the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated herein which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. Dated: May 27, 2008 Commonwealth Land Title InsurrajnceCompany gy 2L&.,� i Authorized Si n ture V Subdivision Guarantee GNT004 Page 1 of 11 Order No.: 40017594 SCHEDULE A 1. Name of Assured: Abbey Road Group 2. Date of Guarantee: May 27, 2008 3. The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: That according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting title to the following described land: See Exhibit A attached hereto. b. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: Christian Faith Center, a Washington non-profit corporation C. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this Guarantee is: A fee simple estate Subject to the Exceptions shown below, which are not necessarily shown in order of their priority. EXCEPTIONS: (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES; OR, (D) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER, WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B), (C) OR (D) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 212104 900395 YEAR BILLED PAID BALANCE 2008 $ 0.00 $00 $00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT INCLUDING INTEREST AND PENALTY: $ 00. LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE LAND: $00 ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEMENTS: $00 (COVERS: PORTION OF PARCEL B EXEMPT) Subdivision Guarantee Page 2 of 11 GNT004 OrderNo40017594 Q GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 212104 9003 YEAR BILLED PAID BALANCE 2008 $4,672.22 $2,336.11 $2,336.11 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT INCLUDING INTEREST AND PENALTY: $2,336.11. LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE LAND: $418,100 ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00 (COVERS: REMAINDER OF PARCEL B NON EXEMPT) GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 212104 9004 YEAR BILLED PAID BALANCE 2008 $ 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT INCLUDING INTEREST AND PENALTY: $0.00. LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE LAND: $0.00 ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00 (COVERS: PORTION OF PARCEL A EXEMPT) GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES AND SERVICE CHARGES, AS FOLLOWS, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST, PENALTY AND STATUTORY FORECLOSURE COSTS, IF ANY, AFTER DELINQUENCY: (1ST HALF DELINQUENT ON MAY 1; 2ND HALF DELINQUENT ON NOVEMBER 1) TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 212104 9004 YEAR BILLED PAID BALANCE 2008 $4,868.47 $2,434.24 $2,434.23 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE, NOT INCLUDING INTEREST AND PENALTY: $2,434.23. LEVY CODE: 1205 ASSESSED VALUE LAND: $435,600 ASSESSED VALUE IMPROVEMENTS: $0.00 (COVERS: REMAINDER OF PARCEL A NON EXEMPT) THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED IS CARRIED ON THE TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT, HOWEVER, IT WILL BECOME TAXABLE FROM THE DATE OF EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE TO A TAXABLE ENTITY AND SUBJECT TO THE LIEN OF REAL PROPERTY TAXES FOR THE BALANCE OF THE YEAR. TAX ACCOUNT NO. 212104 9003.212104 9004 LIABILITY FOR SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES FOR IMPROVEMENTS WHICH HAVE RECENTLY BEEN CONSTRUCTED ON THE LAND. LAND IMPROVEMENTS ARE NOT PRESENTLY ASSESSED, BUT MAY APPEAR ON FUTURE ROLLS. Subdivision Guarantee Page 3 of 11 GNT004 OrderNo40017594 10 11 12 13 NOTICE OF TAP OR CONNECTION CHARGES WHICH HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE DUE IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OR RE -DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAND AS DISCLOSED BY RECORDED INSTRUMENT. INQUIRIES REGARDING THE SPECIFIC AMOUNT OF THE CHARGES SHOULD BE MADE TO THE CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY. CITY/COUNTY/AGENCY: FEDERAL WAY WATER AND SEWER RECORDED: MAY 12, 1989 RECORDING NO.: 8905120210 (SUPERSEDES RECORDING NO. 8106010916) RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EXISTING, FUTURE OR POTENTIAL EASEMENTS FOR ACCESS, LIGHT, VIEW AND AIR, AND ALL RIGHTS OF INGRESS, EGRESS AND REGRESS TO, FROM AND BETWEEN THE LAND AND THE HIGHWAY OR HIGHWAYS CONSTRUCTED ON LANDS CONDEMNED BY PROCEEDINGS UNDER KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. BY: CAUSE NO STATE OF WASHINGTON 533237 RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, RECORDED JANUARY 31, 1988, UNDER RECORDING NO. 16643, AS FOLLOWS: RESERVING AND EXCEPTING FROM SAID LANDS SO MUCH OR SUCH PORTIONS THEREOF AS ARE OR MAY BE MINERAL LANDS OR CONTAIN COAL OR IRON, AND ALSO THE USE AND THE RIGHT AND TITLE TO THE USE OF SUCH SURFACE GROUND AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MINING OPERATIONS, AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO SUCH RESERVED AND EXCEPTED MINERAL LANDS, INCLUDING LANDS CONTAINING COAL OR IRON FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPLORING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: STATE OF WASHINGTON PURPOSE: DRAINAGE AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: NOVEMBER 16, 1964 RECORDING NO.: 5811875 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: STATE OF WASHINGTON PURPOSE: - DRAINAGE SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: DECEMBER 15, 1964 RECORDING NO.: 5823140 EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED RECORDED: RECORDING NO. LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT SEWER MAINS A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF A PORTION SAID PREMISES DECEMBER 31, 1976 7612310607 Subdivision Guarantee Page 4 of 11 GNT004 Order No40017594 14. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT PURPOSE: SEWER MAINS AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: DECEMBER 1, 1976 RECORDING NO.: 7612010608 15. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCEL A OF A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: APRIL 10, 1979 RECORDING NO.: 7904100750 16. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: MARCH 15, 1982 RECORDING NO.: 8203150462 17. UNDERGROUND UTILITY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCELS A AND B OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: MAY 5, 1982 RECORDING NO.: 8205050614 18. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL TELEPHONE PURPOSE: COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCELS A & B OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: MAY 19, 1982 RECORDING NO.: 8205190685 19. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: NOVEMBER 8, 1979 RECORDING NO.: 7911080848 REGARDING: CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAINS (COVERS: PORTION OF PARCEL A) 20. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: WATER DISTRICT 124 RECORDING NO.: NOVEMBER 16, 1981 REGARDING: 8111160425 Subdivision Guarantee Page 5 of 11 GNT004 Order No40017594 21 `) 23 24. 25 26 27 28, AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: JANUARY 25, 1982 RECORDING NO.: 8201250421 REGARDING: LAKEHAVEN SEWER DISTRICT SEWER SERVICE RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED TO KIND BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8410170757 A RE-RECORD OF RECORDING NO. 8111020670. ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY THE SHORT PLAT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8110300869. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAT OR SURVEY TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. RIGHT TO MAKE NECESSARY SLOPES FOR CUTS OR FILLS UPON THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED AS GRANTED TO KING BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8609030322. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED, UNDER RECORDING NO. 9001190831, INCLUDING,' BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LIABILITY FOR ASSESSMENTS LEVIED BY THE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SET FORTH IN SAID INSTRUMENT TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PURPOSE: SURFACE UTILITIES AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF PARCEL A OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: MAY 24, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 9605240519 MATTERS DISCLOSED BY SURVEY: RECORDED: MAY 9, 2000 RECORDING NO.: 2000050990002 ALL COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS, EASEMENTS OR OTHER SERVITUDES, IF ANY, DISCLOSED BY THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20041014900006. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SHOWN ON THE PLAT OR SURVEY TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. Subdivision Guarantee Page 6 of 11 GNT004 Order No40017594 29. 30 31 32 RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, RESERVATION OF TIMBER RIGHTS AND RIGHT OF FIRST OFFER/FIRS REFUSAL AGREEMENT IMPOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20010925002179. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SET FORTH IN SAID INSTRUMENT TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. RELEASE OF TIMBER RESERVATION THERETO: RECORDED: OCTOBER 5, 2004 RECORDING NO.: 20041005001250 AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: REGARDING: (COVERS: PARCEL A) OCTOBER 22, 2003 20031022001068 WATER DISTRIBUTION AND AMENDMENTS THERETO: RECORDED: OCTOBER 21, 2004 RECORDING NO.: 20041021000088 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO: RECORDED: JANUARY 26, 2006 RECORDING NO.: 20060126000471 DEVELOPER EXTENSION AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: OCTOBER 22, 2003 RECORDING NO.: 20031022001069 REGARDING: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT (COVERS: PARCEL A) AND AMENDMENTS THERETO: RECORDED: OCTOBER 21, 2004 RECORDING NO.: 20041021000089 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT: RECORDED: JANUARY 26, 2006 RECORDING NO.: 20060126000474 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO: RECORDED: JANUARY 2, 2008 RECORDING NO.: 20080102000235 AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: RECORDING NO. REGARDING: OCTOBER 22, 2003 20031022001070 WATER DISTRIBUTION Subdivision Guarantee Page 7 of 11 GNT004 Order No40017594 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO: RECORDED: OCTOBER 21, 2004 RECORDING NO.: 20041021000090 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO: RECORDED: JANUARY 26, 2006 RECORDING NO.: 20060126000472 33. CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: AUGUST 19, 2004 AND AUGUST 10, 2007 RECORDING NO.: 20040819000548 AND 20070810000903 REGARDING: BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND THE CHRIS-HAN FAITH CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CHURCH AND PRIVATE SCHOOL 34. LICENSE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 RECORDING NO.: 20040924002073 35. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PUGET SOUND ENERGY PURPOSE: UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION AND/OR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AREA AFFECTED: A PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 RECORDING NO.: 20050907000687 36. EASEMENT AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 RECORDING NO.: 20050915001177 REGARDING: PARCEL A 37. DRAINAGE RELEASE COVENANT IMPOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20051104002444. 38. DECLARATION OF COVENANT, IMPOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED, UNDER RECORDING NO. 20051104002445. THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SCHEDULE A IS BENEFITED BY EASEMENTS, COVENANTS OR OTHER APPURTENANCES SET FORTH IN SAID INSTRUMENT TO BENEFIT OR BURDEN REAL PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAND. 39. UNRECORDED LEASEHOLDS, IF ANY; RIGHTS OF VENDORS AND HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTERESTS ON PERSONAL PROPERTY INSTALLED UPON THE LAND; AND RIGHTS OF TENANTS TO REMOVE TRADE FIXTURES AT THE EXPIRATION OF THE TERM. Subdivision Guarantee Page 8 of 11 GNT004 Order No40017594 40 41 42 43 44 45 CONSTRUCTION DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER TRUSTEE: T D SERVICE BENEFICIARY: EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN CREDIT UNION ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $30,000,000.00 DATED: MAY 26, 2006 RECORDED: MAY 26, 2006 RECORDING NO.: 20060526001642 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ASSIGNOR: CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ASSIGNEE: EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN CREDIT UNION DATED: MAY 26, 2006 RECORDED: MAY 26, 2006 RECORDING NO.: 20060526001643 DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION TRUSTEE: T D SERVICE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $7,000,000.00 DATED: MAY 26, 2006 RECORDED: MAY 26, 2006 RECORDING NO.: 20060526001644 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ASSIGNOR: CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ASSIGNEE: MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT DATED: MAY 26, 2006 RECORDED: MAY 26, 2006 RECORDING NO.: 20060526001645 DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF GRANTOR: CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION TRUSTEE: T D SERVICE COMPANY BENEFICIARY: EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN CREDIT UNION ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $10,000.000.00 DATED: APRIL 7, 2008 RECORDED: APRIL 8, 2008 RECORDING NO.: 20080408001224 ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ASSIGNOR: ASSIGNEE: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, A WASHINGTON NON-PROFIT CORPORATION EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN CREDIT UNION APRIL 7, 2008 APRIL 8, 2008 20080408001225 Subdivision Guarantee Page 9 of 11 GNT004 Order No40017594 NOTE 1: THERE MAY BE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE (UCC) SECURITY INTERESTS FILED WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING IN OLYMPIA, AFFECTING PERSONAL PROPERTY, CROPS OR AGRICULTURAL FACILITIES WHICH ARE NOT COVERED BY THE POLICY TO ISSUE. NOTE 2: A SATISFACTORY SHOWING SHOULD BE MADE OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE OFFICERS EXECUTING THE PROPOSED INSTRUMENT ON BEHALF OF CHRISTIAN FAITH CENTER, A WASHINGTON NON- PROFIT CORPORATION. CURRENT ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS SHOULD BE FURNISHED TO THE COMPANY FOR REVIEW BOTH FOR SAID CHURCH, AND FOR ANY HIGHER DISCIPLINE OR ORGANIZATION TO WHICH IT IS RESPONSIBLE. NOTE 3: BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY, ON THE DATE OF THIS COMMITMENT IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS LOCATED ON THE LAND: COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE(S) KNOWN AS: 33645 20TH AVENUE S FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 NOTE 4: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED, PER AMENDED RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. PARCELS A AND B OF BLA NO. 04-102593-00 SU REC. NO. 20041014900006 NOTE 5: WHEN SENDING DOCUMENTS FOR RECORDING, VIA U.S. MAIL OR SPECIAL COURIER SERVICE, PLEASE SEND TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS, UNLESS SPECIFIC ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE WITH YOUR TITLE UNIT: COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE COMPANY OF PUGET SOUND 1501 - 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 308 SEATTLE, WA 98101 ATTN: RECORDING DEPT. COMMONWEALTH PRE -ADDRESSED ENVELOPES MAY STILL BE USED WHEN SENDING DOCUMENTS VIA TDS (TITLE DELIVERY SERVICE) TO THE ADDRESS ON THE FACE OF THE COMMITMENT COVER PAGE OR TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. OP Enclosures: Sketch Vesting Deed Paragraphs all recorded documents Subdivision Guarantee Page 10 of 11 GNT004 Order No.: 40017594 EXHIBIT `"A" PARCELS A AND B OF CITY OF FEDERAL WAY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 04-102593-00- SU, AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20041014900006, RECORDS OF IQNG COUNTY AUDITOR; EXCEPT THOSE PORTIONS AS CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY FOR SOUTH 336"i STREET RIGHT OF WAY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO'S. 20070830001244, 20070830001255 AND 20070918000945; AND FOR 20TH AVENUE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20070830001254; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE Except to the extent that specific assurances are provided In Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason ofthe following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records, (b) (1) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1). (2) or (3) are shown by the public records Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided In Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any structure or improvements, or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description, (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any Judicial or noryudicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to In Schedule A (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land": the and described or referred to in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed. or other security instrument. (d) "public records": records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (a) "date": the effective date. 2, Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage forwhich the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice, 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently, (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor vdll the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) in all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations (Revised 12/15/95) of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate Proof of Loss or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts givng rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers. checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Al information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6, Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the followng additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, togetherwith any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of paymentand which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required In that paragraph shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee B. Limitation ofLlablllty. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby_ CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a Final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, as stated herein. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company 9. Reduction of Liability or Termination of Liability. Al payments under this Guarantee, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of liability pro tento 10. Payment of Loss. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. 11. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured claimant The Company shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued If requested by the Company, the Assured shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the Assured the Company shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured after the Assured shall have recovered its principal, interest, and costs of collection. 12. Arbitration. Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitrabon Association, Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out of or relating to this Guarantee, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a Guarantee prWaion or other obligation. All arbitrable niD" when the Amount of L'i NlIty is $1.000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Assured. Al arbitr6le matters when tfw amount of $ability Is In excess of $1,000.000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties, The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permits a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party, Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 13. Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Guarantee Entire Contract. (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire Guarantee and contract between the Assured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this Guarantee, this Guarantee shall be construed as a whole.' (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee, (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 14. Notices, Where Sent. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall include the number of this Guarantee and shall be addressed to: Consumer Affairs Department, P.O. Box 27567, Richmond, Virginia 23261-7567. CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations (Revised 12/15/95) 20t" Place Southwest Heliport Proposal King County Assessor's Map LL1 AbbeyRoc-ul r If 20thPlace Southwest Heliport Proposal NW 21-21-04 Ll King County Assessor's Map Lid Abbey Ro ji CITY OF ir Federal Way RECEIVED JUN 1 1 2008 Draft Cm OF CDS�L WAY Environmental Impact Statement Christian Faith Center City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, Washington 98063 November 2003 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Christian Faith Center City of Federal Way 33530 1st Way South Federal Way, Washington 98063 Prepared in Accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act RCW 43.21 C and SEPA Rules WAC 197-11 A Kathy Clung, Responebb Official Date Issued: November 18, 2003 Date of Public Hearing: 'December 4, 2003 Date Comments Due: December 18, 2003 ,7 41k CITY Federalo. Way November 18, 2003 Dear Reader DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33530 First Way South PO Box 9718 P.,1-1 U1- W A GQAA'3_071 R Attached is a copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Christian Faith Center proposal for a church and school to be located on a 47-acre site south of South 336th Street and 20th Avenue South in Federal Way. An Environmental Impact Statement is being prepared for this project to provide decision makers and the public with information on the environmental consequences of the proposal. The Environmental Impact Statement is one source of information that will be used in making a decision on this proposal. Other relevant information will include the policies in the Comprehensive Plan, which guides land use decisions in the city, and public input. The major issues that were identified in the scoping process for this Environmental Impact Statement include impacts on transportation, water resources, vegetation, wetlands and wildlife. For each of these environmental issues, an analysis is provided of how the project will affect these resources. This Draft Environmental Impact Statement is being circulated to agencies and the public to invite comment to ensure that it accurately and completely describes the environmental consequences of the proposal. Written public comments on the DEIS will be accepted for a 30-day review period starting on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 and ending at 5:00 pm on Thursday, December 18, 2003. Written comments should be addressed to Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner, City of Federal Way, Community Development Services Department, PO Box 9718, Federal Way, WA 98063-9718. A public meeting has been scheduled to accept both written and oral comments on the DEIS. No decisions on this application will be made at this meeting. The meeting will be held on Thursday, December 4, 2003 at 7:00 pm at the Federal Way City Hall City Council Chambers, 33530 First Way South, in Federal Way. Following the public comment period, the City will prepare and issue a Final Environmental Impact Statement that will include responses to comments received, and may include revised analysis, if warranted. Hearing Examiner and City Council consideration of the proposal is expected in the Spring of 2004. If you have any questions, please contact Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner at (253) 661- 9718 rj rT Name of Proposal Christian Faith Center Description of Proposal The Christian Faith Center proposes a campus development of a church and school on a 46.58-acre site south of South 336th Street between Highway 99 and Interstate 5 in the City of Federal Way. The proposal objectives are to provide adequate space for the church services, ministries, and schools. The proposal would be developed in three phases and would consist of: • A 54,000-square foot, 4,500-seat sanctuary/auditorium • 164,500 square feet of meeting space, chapel, bookstore, and offices associated with the sanctuary building • A 101,526-square foot school building including: r An initial 81,323-square foot school building with a future second -story 20,203-square foot addition 4.3 acres of recreation and play fields • 1,648 parking stalls are provided on the sanctuary and school sites Location of Proposal 1901 South 336th Street, Federal Way, Washington Proponent Christian Faith Center 21024 24th Ave. S. P.O. Box 98600 Seattle, WA 98198 Proponent Contact Gil Hulsman III, Abbey Road Group (253) 435-3699 Lead Agency City of Federal Way Kathy McClung, SEPA Responsible Official Contact Person Lori Michaelson, AICP, Senior Planner (253) 6614045 Approval and Licenses • Rezone from BP (Business Park) to RM 3.6 (Multifamily Residential, 3,600 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit). The rezone has undergone separate environmental review by the City and is therefore not included in the scope of this EIS. • Development Agreement and Development Plan Approval • Variance — Wetland Modification • Boundary Line Adjustment • Development Permits (Building Permits, Site Development Permits) • State and/or federal permits as applicable, i.e., Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife: Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), Washington Department of Natural Resources: Forest Practices Permit, Washington Department of Ecology: NPDES General Permit for Construction Grading Authors and Principal Parametrix, Inc. Contributors 5808 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 200 Kirkland, WA 98003-7350 Christian Faith Center DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 554-2441-009 (02109) November 2003 Date of Issue FACT SHEET (CONTINUED) (425)822-8880 November 18, 2003 Date Comments Due December 18, 2003, 5:00 PM Submit to: Lori Michaelson, Senior Planner City of Federal Way Community Development Services Department PO Box 9718 Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 Date and Location of Thursday, December 4, 2003, 7:00 PM Draft EIS Public Hearing Federal Way City Hall Council Chambers 33530-1st Way South Federal Way, WA 98062 Date of Action on Spring 2004 Applications Location of Background City of Federal Way Information Community Development Services Department 33530 1st Way South PO Box 9718 Cost of EIS Federal Way, WA 98063-9718 $ 24.00 Printed Copy $ 8.00 Compact Disk (.pdf formt) Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement Ii November 2003 rl TT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY ........................... 1.1 ALTERNATIVES... ................... 1-1 ................... 1-1 1.2 TRANSPORTATION......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 Affected Environment.............................................................................•.............. 1-2 1.2.2 Future Baseline Conditions.................................................................................... 1-3 1.2.3 Impacts of the Proposed Alternatives..................................................................... 1-3 1.2.4 Mitigation...............................................................................................................1-5 1.3 WATERWAYS, HYDROLOGY, AND WATER QUALITY ........................................... 1-8 1.3.1 Affected Environment............................................................................................ 1-8 1.3.2 Impacts................................................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.3 Mitigating Measures............................................................................................... 1-9 1.4 VEGETATION AND WETLANDS................................................................................. 1-11 1.4.1 Affected Environment.......................................................................................... 1-11 1.4.2 Environmental Impacts..............................................•......................................... 1-12 1.4.3 Mitigating Measures............................................................................................. 1-16 1.5 WILDLIFE, FISH, AND ENDANGERED SPECIES ...................................................... 1-18 1.5.1 Affected Environment.......................................................................................... 1-18 1.5.2 Environmental Impacts........................................................................................ 1-19 1.5.3 Mitigating Measures............................................................................................. 1-20 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL AND ALTERNATIVES........................................................ 2-1 2.1 PROPOSAL........................................_.............................................................................. 2-1 2.2 ALTERNATIVES...............................................................................................................2-1 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATING MEASURES ................................... 3-1 3.1 TRANSPORTATION.........................................................................................................3-1 3.1.1 Existing Conditions..........................................................................•..................... 3-1 3.1.2 Impacts of the Alternative.................................................................................... 3-27 3.1.3 Impacts of the Business Park Alternative............................................................. 3-47 3.1.4 Mitigation.............................................................................................................3-48 3.1.5 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts.............................................................................. 3-64 3.1.6 Relationship to Plans and Policies........................................................................ 3-65 3.2 WATERWAYS, HYDROLOGY, AND WATER QUALITY ......................................... 3-70 3.2.1 Studies and Coordination..................................................................................... 3-70 3.2.2 Affected Environment.......................................................................................... 3-70 3.2.3 Environmental Impacts........................................................................................ 3-78 3.2.4 Mitigating Measures............................................................................................. 3-85 3.2.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts........................................................... 3-90 3.3 VEGETATION AND WETLANDS................................................................................. 3-91 3.3.1 Studies and Coordination..................................................................................... 3-91 3.3.2 Affected Environment.......................................................................................... 3-92 3.3.3 Environmental Impacts..................................................................... •................ 3-97 3.3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts................................................................... 3-102 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement Hi November 2003 4BLE OF CONTENTS IConfnuAc 3.3.5 Mitigating Measures........................................................................................... 3-110 3.3.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts......................................................... 3-118 3.3.7 Vegetation and Wetland Regulatory Environment ............................................. 3-119 3.4 WILDLIFE, FISH, AND ENDANGERED SPECIES .................................................... 3-120 3.4.1 Studies and Coordination................................................................................... 3-120 3.4.2 Affected Environment........................................................................................ 3-120 3.4.3 Environmental Impacts...................................................................................... 3-128 3.4.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts................................................................... 3-134 3.4.5 Mitigating Measures........................................................................................... 3-135 3.4.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts......................................................... 3-137 4. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 4-1 APPENDICES A Determination of Scope of Environmental Impact Statement B Wildlife, Fish, and Endangered Species: Relevant Species Documentation C Distribution List ELEMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT NOT ADDRESSED IN EIS See Appendix A — Scoping Determination Earth (Geology, Soils, Topography, Unique Physical Features, Erosion/Accretion) Air (Air Quality, Odor, Climate) Energy and Natural Resources Environmental Health (Noise, Risk of Explosion, Releases of toxic or hazardous materials) Land and Shoreline Use Aesthetics, Light & Glare, Historic and Cultural Preservation Public Services and Utilities — Fire, Police, Schools, Parks an Recreation Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement iv November 2003 LIST OF FIGURES 2-1 Vicinity Map ............................................. ...... .............................................................................. 2-4 2-2 Aerial Photo.................................................................................................................................. 2-5 2-3 Site Plan........................................................................................................................................ 2-6 2-4 Sanctuary Building First Floor Plan............................................................................................. 2-7 2-5 Sanctuary Building Second Floor Plan......................................................................................... 2-8 2-6 Sanctuary Building Elevations..................................................................................................... 2-9 2-7 Sanctuary Building Cross Section.............................................................................................. 2-10 2-8 School Floor Plans...................................................................................................................... 2-11 2-9 School Elevations....................................................................................................................... 2-12 3.1-1 Traffic Volumes Locations — Christian Faith Center................................................................... 3-3 3.1-2 Study Intersections — Christian Faith Center................................................................................ 3-4 3.1-3 Project Trip Distribution, Desire Path .................................. :..................................... ................ 3-38 3.1-4 Project Trip Distribution, Capacity Constrained........................................................................ 3-39 3.1-5 Project Trip Distribution with Roadway Traffic Calming on 20th Avenue South....... .............. 340 3.1-6 Project Trip Distribution with No North-Southbound Through Movement on 20th Avenue South/ South 336th Street..................................................................................... 3-41 3.1-7 South 341st/344th Streets Connection Options.......................................................................... 3-53 3.1-8 18th Avenue South Alignment Option....................................................................................... 3-54 3.1-9 21st Avenue South Alignment Options...................................................................................... 3-55 3.2-1 West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin....................................................................................... 3-71 3.2-2 East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin........................................................................................ 3-72 3.2-3 Site Drainage Subbasins............................................................................................................. 3-73 3.2-4 West Branch Hylebos Creek Regional Detention Facilities....................................................... 3-76 3.2-5 Proposed Site Drainage Facilities............................................................................................... 3-79 3.3-1 Existing Wetlands....................................................................................................................... 3-95 3.3-2 21st Avenue South Alignment Options.................................................................................... 3-104 3.3-3 21st Avenue South Route Option A, Cross Section................................................................. 3-106 3.3-4 21st Avenue South Route Option B, Cross Section................................................................. 3-107 3.3-5 21st Avenue South Route Option C, Cross Section................................................................. 3-108 3.3-6 21st Avenue South Route Option A, Reduced Width Cross Section to MitigateWetland Impacts........................................................................................................ 3-115 3.3-7 21st Avenue South Route Option C, Reduced Width Cross Section to MitigateWetland Impacts........................................................................................................ 3-116 3.3-8 21St Avenue South Potential Mitigation.................................................................................. 3-117 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement v November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) LIST OF TABLES 2.2-1 Statistical Description of Proposed Alternatives................................................................:......... 2-3 3.1-1 Traffic Volume Summary ........................................................................................................... 3-2 3.1-2 Corresponding LOS Grade and Intersection Delay ............................... ....................................... 3-5 3.1-3 Intersection Operations Summary................................................................................................ 3-7 3.1-4 Corridor Accident History Summary (January 1999 to December 2001).................................. 3-21 3.1-5 Intersection Accident History Summary (January 1999 to December 2001)............................. 3-22 3.1-6 Accident Type and Frequency Summary (January 1999 to December 2001)............................ 3-22 3.1-7 Average Vehicle Occupancy Survey Information...................................................................... 3-31 3.1-8 Proposal Trip Generation........................................................................................................... 3-34 3.1-9 Project Impacts to TIP Projects.................................................................................................. 3-68 3.3-1 Federal Way Municipal Code 22-1357 Definitions of Wetland Categories .............................. 3-91 3.3-2 Plant Species Present on the Project Site.................................................................................... 3-93 3.3-3 Wetlands in the Christian Faith Center Project Vicinity............................................................ 3-94 3.3-4 Wetland Impacts......................................................................................................................... 3-98 3.3-5 Wetland Mitigation Incorporated in Proposal.......................................................................... 3-111 3.3-6 Summary of Federal, State, and Local Wetland Regulations................................................... 3-119 3.4-1 Salmonid Fish Species Identified as Present in the Hylebos Creek Watershed ....................... 3-125 3.4-2 Species of Special Concern ...................................................................................................... 3-131 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement vi November 2003 rr 1. SUMMARY 1.1 ALTERNATIVES Two alternatives are analyzed in this EIS, the proposal and a "no action" alternative consisting of industrial use. Proposal: The applicant's current proposal is a campus development of a church and school on a 46.58- acre site south of South 336th Street between Highway 99 and Interstate 5 in the City of Federal Way. The proposal objectives are to provide adequate space for the church services, ministries, and schools. The proposal would be developed in three phases and would consist of: • A 54,000-square foot, 4,500-seat sanctuary/auditorium • 164,500 square feet of meeting space, chapel, bookstore, and offices associated with the sanctuary building • A 101,526-square foot school building including: — An initial 81,323-square foot school building with a future second -story 20,203-square foot addition — 4.3 acres of recreation and play fields • 1,648 parking stalls on both sites Site development for all phases includes: • Construction and dedication of 20th Avenue South within the site extending from South 336th Street to South 341st Place with a signal at 20th Avenue and South 336th Street. • Construction of frontage improvements on South 336th Street. • One site access driveway to South 336th Street, one driveway to Pacific Highway South (SR-99) and driveway access to the new 20th Avenue South. • Storm drainage detention and water quality facilities in the northwest corner of the site by terms of a pre-existing Settlement Agreement with the City. • Two new detention/treatment facilities in the eastern part of the site. • Displacement of 3,762 square feet of Wetland C located near the center of the site with mitigation adjacent to the existing Wetland B in the easterly portion of the site. • Displacement of 16,316 square feet of wetland buffer area from the south side of Wetland A in the northwestern corner of the site with additional buffer area added along the easterly side of Wetland A. • Provision of landscaping, including school playfield, 25-foot-wide landscape area adjacent to South 336th Street, 15-foot-wide landscape area on the south perimeter, and parking lot landscaping. Church and school use includes: • Daily use of the school (Monday through Friday) for instruction and related activities, including sports. Christian Faith Center DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-1 554-2441-009 (02109) November 2003 ■ Daily use of the church (Monday through Friday) for administrative purposes, bible studies, and the Dominion College, which is a leadership training program that meets during the day and evenings. ■ Church services on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. • Conferences involving up to 3,000 attendees. The City of Federal Way and other non -church community groups are expected to have the ability to use the facility based on specific agreements with the church. It is expected that such use would be governed by conditions of approval of the church and would be required to be consistent with church use and not exceed the level of impact from the church for elements such as trip generation. The No -Action Alternative consists of two scenarios: A. No-Action/No Development Scenario: This consists of no development of the site and consists of continuation of existing conditions as described in the Affected Environment subsection of each Element of the Environment analyzed. B. No-Action/Business Park Scenario: This no -action alternative consists of development of the site as a business park under existing Business Park (BP) zoning. The latter scenario assumes: • Construction of 20th Avenue South through the site, in the same configuration as proposed for the church. • The same wetland setbacks and mitigation provisions as the proposed church. ■ Greater impervious surface, because of the lack of recreation areas, with somewhat larger open stormwater detention areas. • The same perimeter landscaping, with less parking lot landscaping because of fewer parking stalls (see below). • Development of warehouses and wholesale distribution facilities, including office and accessory retail sales. In accordance with Federal Way City Code 22.864, use is assumed to include: — 50 percent warehouse space — 30 percent office space — 20 percent accessory retail sales and service facilities 1.2 TRANSPORTATION 1.2.1 Affected Environment The study area for project impacts includes elements of the circulation system in an area roughly bounded by South 320th Street on the north, South 356th Street on the south, 21st Avenue SW on the west and Weyerhaeuser Way South on the east. Level of Service for major intersections were assessed based on Highway Capacity Manual methodology for existing 2002 conditions. Bicycle and Pedestrian circulation facilities were assessed as well as vehicle and pedestrian safety. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-2 November 2003 I ,i 1.2.2 Future Baseline Conditions Future baseline conditions without the project were developed for the opening year of the proposal, 2006/2007 and for 2020 using the City of Federal Way EMME/2 peak hour travel demand model. The transportation model includes forecasts of traffic increased from growth in the region as well as within the City of Federal Way. These forecasts were used to develop future traffic volumes on streets. In addition to traffic forecasts, future improvements to roadways and intersections were utilized to perform Level of Service calculations based on Highway Capacity Manual methodology for the future analysis years of 2006/2007 and 2020. Growth in traffic volumes on arterials ranged from little or no growth to about a 25 percent increase to 2006/2007. Traffic volumes on Pacific Highway South in the vicinity of South 336th Street increased by approximately 24 percent from 2002 to 2006/2007. Some local and collector streets were forecast for higher traffic growth. Similar growth rates were experienced in the 2002 to 2020 period leading to a 43 percent increase in traffic on Pacific Highway South at the same location. For the year 2006/2007 horizon year without the project, the following intersections are projected- to operate at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater for any lane group in the year 2006/2007 during one or more of the peak periods analyzed: • Pacific Highway South/South 312th Street (Weekday PM street peak). + South 320th Street/23rd Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). + South 336th Street/lst Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). • Pacific Highway South/South 344th Street (Weekday PM school peaks). ■ 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Weekday PM school, and Sunday after -services peaks). • 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street (Weekday PM street peak). For the 2020 horizon year the following intersections operate are projected to at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater for any lane group during one or more of the peak periods analyzed: ■ 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Sunday after -services peak). ■ 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street (Weekday PM street peak). 1.2.3 Impacts of the Proposed Alternatives Impacts of the Christian Faith Center proposal were projected based on trip generation characteristics of the existing church and projections of other uses such as the K-12 school, Dominion College and other activities such as bible study groups meeting in the facility. To provide a conservative case for church trip generation, 90 percent occupancy of the sanctuary capacity of 4,500 seats was projected. Trips from the proposal were distributed on the local circulation system. Three potential distributions were developed for the project: • The Desire -Path Trip Distribution represents the most direct route for trips to various destinations and is based on a combination of the EMME/2 trip forecast model and home zip codes of current church members. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-3 November 2003 ■ The Capacity Constrained Trip Distribution represents a response to the capacity constraints of the intersection at South 341st Street/16th Avenue South to handle westbound to southbound left turns. This distribution changes exiting patterns from the site by shifting traffic to the north on 20th Avenue South, but does not change the overall destinations in the desire path distribution. • Two Traffic Calming Trip Distributions are indicated in Figures 3.1-5 and 3.1-6 and incorporate the potential effects of a variety of traffic calming options discussed below in Section 3.1.4.4 that could be implemented on 20th Avenue South to discourage traffic movement through the residential neighborhood to the north of the site. Intersection Level of Service analysis was performed for the weekday AM peak hour, the weekday PM peak hour for trip generation from the school and church, the weekday street PM peak hour and the peak hour for church trip generation on Sunday. Year 2007 Project LOS Impacts The results of Level of Service analysis for the horizon year 2006/2007 for the Desire -Path Trip Distribution resulted in the following facilities projected to operate at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater for any lane group: + East-3 Access Driveway/20th Avenue South (Sunday after services peak). • Pacific Highway South/South 312th Street (Weekday PM street peak). • South 320th Street/23rd Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak and Sunday after service peak). * South 336th Street/Ist Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). • 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street (Weekday PM school and street, and Sunday between and after service peaks). • Pacific Highway South/South 344th Street (Weekday PM school peak). ■ 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Weekday PM school and Sunday after services peak). • 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 356th Street (Weekday PM street peak). Year 2020 Project LOS Impacts The LOS analyses for 2020 with the Desire Path Distribution indicates that additional improvements included in the City of Federal Way Capital Improvement Program for completion between 2007 and 2020 mitigate many of the impacts identified for the year 2007, above. The following intersections projected to operate at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater in 2020 for any lane group with the presumed CIP projects implemented: • South 341st Street/16th Avenue South (All peaks analyzed). + 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Sunday after -service peak). • 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street (Weekday PM street peak). • East-3 Access Driveway/20th Avenue South (Sunday after services peak). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-4 November 2003 �I I The Capacity Constrained Distribution was also analyzed for intersections where project trips would change as compared to the Desire Path Distribution. The Capacity Constrained Trip Distribution shifted approximately 400 Sunday after service trips north on 20th Avenue South in response to the capacity constraints of the intersection at South 341st Street/16th Avenue South. This distribution changes exiting patterns from the site by shifting traffic to the north on 20th Avenue South but does not change the overall destinations in the desire path distribution. This, scenario resulted in no change in impacts except improvement of the South 341st Street/16th Avenue South intersection to LOS E and degradation of an additional site intersection accessing 20th Avenue South to LOS F. The Traffic Calming Trip Distribution incorporates the potential effects of a variety of traffic calming features on 20th Avenue South in the residential area north of the project site. Two options are analyzed: • In -street measures that slow traffic and divert about 50 percent of trips • Through movement diverters, which prohibit north -south movements at the intersection with South 336th Street The re-routing of background and project trips from 20th Avenue South doe not result in additional impacts on intersections analyzed. 1.2.4 Mitigation Several alternative strategies for mitigation were explored. Individual intersection improvements were identified and evaluated for feasibility. The intersections at which improvements might be required to accommodate both general growth in traffic and the trips from the project include: Mitigation for Year 2007 Project LOS Impacts • Pacific Highway South/South 312th Street (Weekday PM street peak). Add a second northbound left -turn lane. • South 320th Street/23rd Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak and Sunday after service peak). Add a second northbound right -turn lane, convert northbound through -right lane to northbound through, and add second northbound through -lane. ■ South 336th Streedlst Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). Convert the westbound right - turn movement to protected during southbound left -turn movement. • 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street (All peaks). The closure of the westbound to southbound left -turn movement mitigates the intersection operations for the weekday peak periods but does not improve the Sunday street peak to standard. There are no readily available improvements at this intersection that would mitigate the demand for southbound left turns with the Desire Path Distribution. To mitigate operations in the Sunday street peak, two options are effective: — The Capacity Constrained Distribution that routes southbound traffic beyond the LOS E capacity of the intersection to alternate routes to the north. — A connection between South 341st Street and South 344th Street that would allow southbound traffic to route to the 16th Avenue South/South 344th Street signalized intersection where left -turn capacity could be enhanced. This requires no further improvements beyond those included in the CIP. • 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Weekday PM school and Sunday after service peak). This intersection operates at overcapacity conditions under no -build conditions with a maximum v/c ratio of 1.24. Conditions related to the projects can be mitigated to operations Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-5 November 2003 better than no -build with the addition of a northbound right -turn lane. In general, the operations of this particular location should be resolved by improvements recommended in the Triangle Study. • Access Driveways from the site to 20"' Avenue South (Sunday after service peak). Possible solutions include the installation of a roundabout (would significantly displace parking stalls), signalization, or to have persons direct traffic at peak times on Sundays. Because this is a private access onto a public road, it is not required to be mitigated. Mitigation for Year 2020 Project LOS Impacts The following are mitigation measures required to improve operations at those intersections degrading below the City's LOS E standard, as a result of project impacts: • 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street (All peaks analyzed). The closure of the westbound left-. turn movement mitigates the intersection operations for the weekday peak periods but does not improve the Sunday street peak to the LOS E standard. There are no readily available improvements at this intersection that would mitigate the demand for southbound left turns with the Desire Path Distribution. To mitigate operations in the Sunday street peak, two options are discussed below: The Capacity Constrained Distribution, discussed above. This distribution recognizes the capacity constraint at the intersection of South 341st Street and 16th Avenue South. It routes southbound traffic beyond the capacity of that intersection northbound on 20th Avenue South to South 336th Street where it splits into alternative routes. This scenario results in an additional driveway access to 20th Avenue South to operate at LOS F. Mitigation of this impact would be the same as mitigation for driveway East 3, discussed above. It is not, however, possible to project with certainty that this trip distribution scenario will occur consistently. Drivers may persist in the "desired path" distribution if they perceive the waiting time at the intersection of South 341st and 16th Avenue South to be less than the travel time on the alternate route. Operation of the intersection of South 341st Street and 16th Avenue South beyond capacity may also generate additional accidents, especially left -turn collisions. — A connection between South 341st Street and South to South 344th Street that would allow southbound traffic to route to the 16th Avenue South/South 344th Street signalized intersection where left -turn capacity could be enhanced by a proposed CIP project. This measures mitigates the impact without additional mitigation. Impacts of the mitigating measures are discussed below: • East-3 Access Driveway/20th Avenue South (Sunday after service peak). The operations of the site -access driveway is similar to the year 2007. • 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Sun after service peak). The operations of this particular location should be resolved by improvements recommended in the Triangle Study currently underway with the Washington Dept. of Transportation and local jurisdictions. Connection between 341st Street South and 344th Street South Potential changes in the traffic circulation system include the addition of a street link between South 341st Street and South 344th Street to accommodate general circulation and to allow peak traffic from Sunday services at the proposed church to utilize the intersection at South 344th Street and 16th Avenue South. Two alternative routes to provide the connection were investigated: Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-6 November 2003 �I + 18th Avenue South which contains a through right-of-way but which has been blocked with a berm since the early 1980s in order to discourage industrial traffic from the business park in the area from using a street bounded by 16 residences. The berm was designated a temporary measure and it was presumed that the residences would eventually transition to industrial uses as allowed by the zoning. If this roadway were opened to connect South 341st Street and South 344th Street, the character of traffic on the street would change from the current trips to serve the existing residences that likely don't exceed 16 in the PM peak hour to approximately 310 weekday PM peak hour trips, including about 90 project trips, and approximately 460 trips on Sunday, during the peak exiting time of the church, with about 420 of those generated by the church. This would lead to a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood in terms of traffic related noise and accident exposure. A variety of measures can be implemented to slow traffic and increase safety, as outlined in the traffic calming measures above. Potential features that could be considered include: — Installation of sidewalks to provide a safe pedestrian walkway; — Chicanes, could be used to provide a curved roadways to reduce speeds and provide more of a neighborhood feel; — Chokers, mid -block curb extensions that narrow a street could reduce speeds and also serve as safe pedestrian crosswalks if so marked. — Chicanes and chokers could be designed, together with signage, to limit the use of the street by heavy trucks if that was desired. With these mitigating measures, the street would still undergo a major transformation. The likely long-term effect of opening the street would be to encourage a transition to non-residential uses. + 21st Avenue South which contains a half -street right of way south of South 341st Street but is bounded by a parcel owned by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) that contain wetlands that abut the right -of way. Three alignments were investigated for this corridor. — Expansion of the existing right-of-way with fill impacts on adjacent wetlands; — a corridor to the west on an existing parking lot that would largely avoid wetland impacts, and; — an alignment to the east that would bisect wetlands. City, State and Federal wetland regulations generally discourage wetland displacement for road construction if there are alternatives. Traffic Calming Measures to discourage general public trips and trips from the proposed church and school on 20th Avenue South which passes through the residential neighborhood to the north include a variety of options including speed bumps, roadway narrowings, S-curves, and possible restrictions on through movements at intersections. For traffic originating at the church and school, members can be encouraged to take other routes through the desire to be a good neighbor. Such a good neighbor progam can be communicated through a variety of methods. If traffic calming measures are successful in diverting 50 percent of the through trips on 20th Avenue South to other streets (primarily Pacific Highway South) additional mitigation would not be required on routes to which trips were diverted. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-7 November 2003 1.3 WATERWAYS, HYDROLOGY, AND WATER QUALITY 1.3.1 Affected Environment A tributary of the West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin flows across the northwest corner of the site and flows through Wetland A (the Kitt's Corner Wetland). A tributary of the East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin, flows across the easterly boundary of the site and flows through Wetland B. The 2002 City of Federal Way Stream Inventory classifies both on -site streams as major streams. Hylebos Creek is listed as a Class A water under State Water Quality Standards. According to the City of Federal Way Water Quality Applications Map, the west half of the proposed site lies within a Resource Stream Protection Area, while the east portion lies in a Basic Water Quality Treatment Area. The Executive Proposed Basin Plan for Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound documents the effects of urbanization on natural channels in the Hylebos Basin, including the flume -like nature of many channel reaches, where channel erosion, neighboring hillside erosion, and downstream deposition of channel- and culvert -clogging sediment are much higher than under natural conditions. The Basin Plan proposed constnlction of a system of regional conveyance and detention facilities to address the problems identified along the Hylebos West Tributary. Multiple projects have been completed by the City of Federal Way, and included detention upgrades to the Kitts Corner Wetland (Wetland A) on site. The site lies just outside of the aquifer recharge zone, and on -site groundwater is not likely to provide significant contribution to this area. Existing conditions on the proposed site are 90 percent forested and 3 percent wetland, with the remaining 7 percent a mixture of impervious surfaces, pasture, and grass (Figure 3.2-5). 1.3.2 Impacts 1.3.2.1 Impacts of the Proposed Alternative The proposed alternative would convert the site into about 50 percent impervious surfaces and 50 percent pervious surfaces, including 18 percent wetlands, streams, and buffers, 22 percent landscaping and drainage facilities, and about 10 percent grassed playfield. This would result in increased surface runoff, reduced stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge and increased surface water temperature. The proposal includes on -site stormwater detention and treatment facilities including two new detention/treatment ponds on the easterly portion of the site. The westerly portion of the site discharges into the existing Kitts Corner Detention Facility with water quality treatment and relies on detention incorporated in the regional detention system design. The stormwater facilities on site are generally designed to meet a performance goal of 80 percent removal of total suspended solids (particulates), usually the larger, coarser fraction of those particles present. Expected runoff pollutants include suspended metals and smaller suspended solids (particulates) as well as other pollutants. The proposed stormwater facilities would discharge flows towards the southern boundaries of each of the on -site wetlands depriving them of potential recharge. Erosion and sedimentation impacts are likely during site clearing and construction. The proposed use of level spreaders at stormwater discharge can lead to concentrated discharge and severe erosion downslope of the discharge. This not only results in damage to areas adjacent to level spreaders, but it can lead to sediment deposition and damage to aquatic habitat farther downstream. Discharge of stormwater from the site is designed to meet Level 1 flow control to prevent flows from becoming so great that they overtop the stream banks and flood surrounding areas. However, stormwater from the site may contribute to erosion and sedimentation impacts that can occur in a stream well before Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-8 November 2003 its banks are flooded. Moderate rains that last for several days produce flows that may never flood a stream, but will erode the soils and vegetation from its banks or mobilize sediment in the streambed due to constant impact over time. Cumulative impacts of this development, together with existing stormwater runoff and future projects may impact downstream sections of Hylebos Creek, including those with resident and anadromous fish. 1.3.2.2 Impacts of the No-Action/Business Park Alternative It is assumed that the business park alternative would cover the same developed portion of the site, and in addition, the area devoted to the sports field would be used for buildings, parking, and required landscaping. In addition, the business park alternative would dedicate a larger portion of the final development to building area as opposed to parking. The impacts of the business park alternative would be similar to those discussed for the proposed alternative. 1.3.3 Mitigating Measures The impacts from added impervious surface and resulting increase surface runoff can be reduced by decreasing the amount and/or the effect of new impervious surface through the following methods: + Use of green roofs on the proposed sanctuary and/or school buildings. • Increased areas of pervious surface and tree and brush cover density in proposed parking lot landscaping areas to provide additional interception of rainwater. + Infiltration of roof drain discharges rather than the proposed surface discharge. • Use of roof parking, underground parking, or a multi -level parking garage to reduce the total area of impervious surface and allow retention of a greater percentage of the site in open space. The cost of such alternatives, however, would be significantly greater than the proposed surface parking. • Limits to the amount of surface parking to the minimum required by code. + Use of porous (pervious) pavements on driveways, parking areas, and/or sidewalks. The proposed stormwater discharge locations that bypass the on -site wetlands could be mitigated with multiple detention/water quality treatment facilities discharging at multiple points along the existing wetland buffer boundaries. Expected runoff pollutants include suspended metals and suspended solids (particulates). The impacts of these pollutants on surrounding waterbodies could be mitigated by Enhanced Treatment measures, for new detention/treatment facilities which target the removal of suspended metals and total suspended solids. The possible increased temperatures of stormwater discharged from the site during summer months could be mitigated by: • Infiltrating stormwater discharges into the soil can cool water as it moves through the ground; • Use of green roofs would contribute to decreases in the temperature of runoff from roofs; • Increased shading of paved areas from greater density of tree cover in parking lots or interplanting with vegetation would reduce temperature of runoff that comes in contact with pavement; + Dense bank cover providing shade around the edges of detention/treatment ponds can reduce the temperature of standing water. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-9 November 2003 Impacts from the possible use of pesticides for sports field maintenance could be reduced or avoided with an Integrated Pest Management Plan, for control of fertilizer and pesticide application. The possible erosion and sedimentation impacts of using level spreaders for stormwater discharge could be avoided by discharging stormwater facilities into flow dispersion/infiltration trenches. The bypassing of wetlands by discharge facilities cari be mitigated by multiple discharge points. Reduction in erosion and sedimentation in streams caused by flows of smaller intensity but greater duration can be mitigated by providing by Level 2 flow control on the East Branch of Hylebos Creek. A variety of Best Management Practices (BMP) incorporate erosion/sedimentation control features designed to prevent sediment -laden runoff from leaving the site or adversely affecting water resources during construction. These include: • Delineation of clearing limits and areas to remain undisturbed during construction and use of filter fabric/silt fences at the downstream site perimeter. • Maintaining vegetated buffer zones (in addition to wetland and stream buffers) to filter unconcentrated construction runoff. • Performing earthwork during the dry summer months. • Stabilization of construction entrances and immediate stabilization of construction roads and parking areas. • Runoff water quality treatment through the use of sediment ponds and other treatment facilities. • Protection of all new and existing catch basins downstream of construction activities from suspended particles in runoff. • Control of surface water discharge by using interceptors and conveyance ditches, grass -lined channels, or pipes to direct runoff from construction areas to sediment traps, ponds and other treatment facilities. Control of any dust or exposed soils that are dry enough to be transported by wind and affect roadways, drainage ways, or surface waters. • Minimizing the risk of soil contamination during construction by restricting fueling and equipment maintenance to a designated staging area with containment features, and a spill clean - provisions. • Providing appropriate disposal facilities for wastes generated during construction. • Designation of a responsible persons for implementation of controls. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-10 November 2003 1.4 VEGETATION AND WETLANDS 1.4.1 Affected Environment 1.4.1.1 Upland Vegetation As stated in Section 3.2.3.1 (Impacts of the Proposed Alternative), existing conditions on the proposed site are approximately 90 percent forested and 3 percent wetland, with the remaining 7 percent as a mixture of impervious surfaces, pasture, and grass. The forest vegetation is well established and uniformly distributed throughout the site and is dominated by generally healthy, mature Douglas -fir. Most of these trees would meet the City code definition of significant trees (FWCC 22-1). In addition to Douglas -fir, there are minor numbers present of Western red cedar and western hemlock in the overstory. A dense understory uniformly covers the site. There are no known rare plant species on the site. The existing forest vegetation currently functions to provide significant amounts of rainwater interception, provides organic material to the forest soil, and facilitates soil porosity. These hydrologic functions help to reduce stormwater runoff. The vegetation provides cover and forage for arthropods, amphibians, birds, and small mammals. The forest vegetation contributes significant primary production and temperature attenuation and supports active nutrient cycling both above and below ground. 1.4.1.2 Wetlands Three wetland areas are located within the parcel boundaries. Two of these areas are associated with streams, and the third area is hydrologically isolated. Wetlands provide significant functions and values that arise from both living and nonliving components and include processes necessary for the self -maintenance of the ecosystem, such as primary product production and nutrient cycling. Specific wetland functions include wildlife habitat, critical groundwater recharge, additions of organic matter to stream food webs, nutrient cycling, sediment trapping and other improvements in water quality. In addition, wetlands are valued for their ability to provide floodwater storage capacity that attenuates floodwater peaks downstream. Wetland A is located adjacent to the northwest property corner. This wetland is also known as the "Kitts Corner Wetland". The entire wetland is approximately 4.5 acres, with 14,000 square feet on -site. It is a City of Federal Way Category H-Forested wetland. It does not meet the Category I criteria because salmonids listed under the Endangered Species Act are not present on or immediately downstream of the site on the West or East Branch of Hylebos Creek. The wetland is currently well -vegetated, mainly with mature willow shrubs and hardhack spirea. Sparse herbaceous vegetation includes slough sedge and reed canarygrass. The West Branch of Hylebos Creek flows through the area, providing surface water to the wetland. The City of Federal Way modified the wetland as part of a flood mitigation program. Four- to six -foot -high earthen berms along the western and southern wetland boundaries and a spillway allow for greater volumes of stormwater to accumulate in the wetland than would have been possible in the native configuration. In addition to streamflow, water to the wetland is supplied by groundwater discharge that occurs along the eastern wetland boundary. A pre-existing settlement agreement between the City of Federal Way and the landowner as part of the acquisition of the stormwater facility included a definition of the wetland boundary and provided for dimensions of the wetland buffer. Buffer conditions on the west, north, and south perimeters of the wetland are poor. In contrast, the wetland buffer east of the wetland is in good condition and largely consists of Douglas -fir overstory with a deciduous mixed -shrub understory. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-11 November 2003 Wetland •B (approximately 1.1 acres on -site) is a linear, riparian wetland that lies parallel to the eastern boundary of the proposed site adjacent to the east branch of the Hylebos Creek. The wetland is rated as Category II Palustrine Forested because salmonids listed under the Endangered Species Act are not present on or immediately downstream of the site. Wetland hydrology is maintained largely by groundwater discharge from the toe of slope along the western wetland boundary. The groundwater source is very likely to include most of the site that is in this basin. Hydrology is also supported by seasonal flows of the East Branch Hylebos Creek and roadway runoff from I-5. The wetland is vegetated mainly with deciduous forest species with a diverse shrub understory. A portion of the wetland was previously disturbed by the installation of a sewer line, and vegetation currently consists of willows, salmonberry, and Himalayan blackberry in this area. Vegetation in the remaining portions of the wetland includes both young and mature Western red cedar, red alder, and black cottonwood trees. Oregon ash is also present in smaller numbers. Herbaceous species lining the ephemeral streambed include creeping buttercup, stinging nettles, water parsley, and bittersweet nightshade. Wetter locations support skunk cabbage. The wetland provides functions related to water quantity and water quality may provide significant improvement to the stormwater draining from I-5. The wetland provides groundwater discharge supporting stream baseflows, organic matter inputs supporting the aquatic food chain, temperature attenuation protecting organisms from temperature extremes, and sediment control and nutrient retention and cycling that provides increased water quality. These functions are important to the associated stream system's health. The wetland provides cover and forage for a variety of wildlife that are tolerant of the I- 5 noise. Buffer vegetation along the length of Wetland B is well established and currently in excellent condition. The I-5 road prism limits the buffer area on the eastern portion of the wetland. Vegetation consists of mature Douglas -fir overstory with a component of deciduous trees. Understory vegetation includes salal, sword fern, huckleberry, and vine maple. Considerable noise from I-5 dominates the area, reducing suitability for some wildlife use of the buffer. Wetland C (approximately 3,762 square feet) is located in the central portion of the property. It is a Category III Palustrine scrub -shrub wetland. It is hydrologically isolated and does not have a defined inlet or outlet: A seasonally high groundwater table supports wetland hydrology, and the area also functions to provide groundwater recharge. The area is well -vegetated with hardhack spirea, with a fringe of a few Oregon ash trees and willows. The small shrub wetland provides some habitat diversity in an otherwise uniform Douglas -fir forested area. Buffer vegetation in the vicinity of Wetland C is in excellent condition and consists of a Douglas -fir overstory with a mixed deciduous shrub understory. 1.4.2 Environmental Impacts 1.4.2.1 Impacts of the Proposed Alternative Upland Vegetation The proposed alternative would directly affect the majority of the forested upland vegetation, resulting in reduction of local plant species diversity, plant structural diversity, and standing biomass. Retained native vegetation would include a corridor of existing upland trees and understory that would be preserved along the northern project boundary. Upland vegetation in Wetlands A and B buffers would also be retained. New landscaping would provide turf in playfields and ornamental species in parking Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-12 November 2003 strips, roadside plantings, and adjacent to the buildings. These areas of vegetation retention in total appear to satisfy the significant tree retention requirement of the City of Federal Way (FWCC 22-1658). Removal of forest would decrease plant cover that provides wildlife habitats, and eliminate related functions such as rainwater interception, providing organic material to the forest soil, and facilitating soil porosity, and would increase temperature in surface water runoff. Wetlands No direct impacts are anticipated to Wetland A because no activities are planned to occur within the wetland boundary. Wetland buffer area of 16,316 square feet will be displaced by an access driveway on the south side. Additional compensating buffer area will be provided on the east side of Wetland A. Wetland B alteration includes displacement of an area adjacent to South 336th Street to accommodate widening. In addition, regrading is proposed for a 1,500 square foot portion of the existing wetland to establish finished elevations that match those of the wetland created to compensate for displacement of Wetland C. Some incidental disturbance of the existing wetland can be expected from the adjacent grading. In addition, about 2,000 square feet of the existing wetland is proposed to be cleared of non- native plants and replanted with native species. Wetland C (3,762 square feet, Category III) would be filled and displaced by the proposal with additional wetland and buffer area provided adjacent to Wetland B. Wetland impacts include the following: Direct Impact Wetland (Area) Wetland A None Wetland B Wetland C Displacement adjacent to So. 336th Street Regrading to create additional wetland area 3,762 SF; entire wetland and buffer to be displaced by proposed alternative Indirect Impacts • Alteration in quality, depth, and duration of water • Unstable hydrograph • Reduction of groundwater discharge to the wetland • Roadway directly adjacent to wetland boundary on southern edge • Alteration in water quality • Increased human intrusion due to proximity • Reduction of recharge functions to groundwater • Reduction of habitat diversity Cumulative Impacts • Reduction of shrub vegetation from prolonged inundation • Decrease in groundwater - dependent wetland hydrology • Decrease of small mammal, songbird, and amphibian habitat potential • Alteration in duration of wetland hydrology • Decrease of wetland area currently dependent on groundwater discharge • Decrease of wildlife use Temporary Construction Impacts • Noise • Sedimentation • Altered hydrology from construction ponds • Noise • Sedimentation • Altered hydrology from construction ponds Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-13 November 2003 1.4.2.2 Impacts of the No-Action/Business Park Alternative Upland Vegetation Impacts to vegetation by the business park alternative would be the same as impacts to vegetation in the proposed alternative. The majority of the forest vegetation on the site would be removed. Depending on the type and distribution of buildings and other impervious surfaces, the residual forest would be located in areas different from the proposed alternative. The impacts to wildlife habitats, stormwater volumes, and water quality would be largely the same as or slightly higher than the proposed alternative because the portion that is ball fields in the proposed alternative would be impervious surfaces in the business park alternative. Wetlands Impacts to Wetlands A, B, and C by the business park alternative would largely parallel the impacts of the proposal. Direct impacts to Wetland A or B would likely be avoided, and Wetland C would likely be filled. Indirect impacts would be similar as well. The minor.change in the type and increased intensity of uses of impervious surface would result in some degradation to water quality; however, additional stormwater treatment would likely be required. Water quality would be similar, with slightly greater impacts expected due to greater impervious surfaces. Like the proposed alternative, it is assumed that the business park alternative would use Wetland A as stormwater detention, thus impacts to this wetland would be the same as in the proposed alternative. 1.4.2.3 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts Potential cumulative impacts relate to future road improvements to serve future increases in transportation demand, including demand from this project. 336th Street Widening A potential cumulative impact to Wetland A buffers is likely to occur from future widening of South 336th Street northwest of the project boundary. This widening is not expected to result in wetland displacement because the existing fill slope from the existing roadway can accommodate a widened roadway with employment of retaining walls rather than the 2:1 slope currently in place. The current buffer area is not densely vegetated; therefore high quality habitat or shading will not be lost. The future roadway improvements however will be closer to the wetland and result in potential line -of -sight impacts to wildlife using the wetland. 21st Avenue Extension Future extension of 21st Avenue to the south of the site to provide a connection between South 341st Street to South 344th Street is a potential transportation mitigation measure. Extension of 21st Avenue south to provide the connection may affect wetlands on an off -site parcel. These additional wetlands are located to the east of the existing alignment of the street in a parcel currently owned by the Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and intended for development of stormwater detention and treatment facilities for I-5. Three alignment options are analyzed for the connection. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-14 November 2003 Tributary 0016A to East Branch Hylebos Creek flows through the site in an existing culvert. None of the alignment options would disturb the existing culverted stream. Restoring the stream to a more natural open channel could be included as a mitigation measure for all the options. The wetland on the site is an approximately triangular shaped area in the northwest portion of the WSDOT parcel and extends about half way down the east side of the existing right-of-way between the current 21st Avenue terminus and South 344th Street. Approximately 1/3 of the wetland has been disturbed by frequent recreational vehicle use. In the disturbed area, vegetation is lacking and soils are churned by tire tracking. Hydrology in the wetland appears to be primarily supported by stream flow that overflows out of the gap between the culverts conveying the stream. While the stream does not flow through the wetland, the hydrologic connection between the stream, which is probably the major water source, indicates that the wetland is properly classified under the Federal Way Land Use Code as a Type II Wetland. Impacts on the wetland from Option A, the central corridor, along the alignment of the existing right-of- way would require fill of up to 12 feet near the end of the existing roadway at the north and about 4 to 6 feet of fill near South 344th Street. A portion of the wetland at the- foot of the slope would be displaced. The extent of displacement will depend on whether fill slopes or retaining walls are employed. With a fill slope displacement of about 11,000 square feet of wetland (about a quarter acre) is estimated. The wetland area displaced is the highest quality vegetation community on the site, rather than the portion disturbed by recreation vehicles. In addition, it would displace all of the buffer area on the west side of the wetland. Buffer vegetation could be replaced on the roadway fill slope, but would not be equal in quality. The westerly corridor (Option B) would be constructed on current impervious surface used for parking. Wetland area would not be displaced, but the roadway would be within the wetland buffer and may introduce additional proximity impacts, such as vehicle noise, as compared to the existing use of the parking lot for truck storage. Water quality impacts to the wetland would likely be less than existing runoff from the gravel surface of the parking lot due to incorporation of stormwater detention and treatment into the proposed road extension. The easterly corridor (Option C) would pass through the existing wetland and would potentially displace up to four tenths of an acre of wetland, including undisturbed wetlands in the northwest corner of the site and disturbed wetlands to the south. This alignment would have the greatest impact on wetland function by splitting the wetland into two isolated fragments. The two smaller isolated wetlands would experience a reduction in size and diversity of vegetation communities. The reduction in diversity and fragmentation would lead to a reduction in small mammal, songbird, and amphibian habitat and populations. The loss of buffers would add to direct line -of sight impacts to species using the existing wetlands. 1.4.2.4 Regional Growth Cumulative impacts to wetlands and vegetation also result from regional urbanization. This urbanization results in habitat fragmentation and isolation of natural areas. Wetlands become isolated from functioning upland and lake habitats, resulting in reduction of habitat support for species that rely on wetlands for some life stages or activities. Urbanization also provides increased opportunities for degradation such as vegetation disturbance, non-native species invasion, and alterations and destabilization of hydrologic functions. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02/09) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-15 November 2003 1.4.3 Mitigating Measures 1.4.3.1 Vegetation Mitigation incorporated into the proposal to lessen impacts from vegetation removal includes: retaining and enhancing perimeter landscaping that meets or exceeds code requirements. Additional preservation of existing stands of trees on the site can contribute to maintaining hydrologic functions (such as interception, infiltration, temperature attenuation of runoff through shading) and provide wildlife functions for some birds that use small habitat patches. Provision of additional stands of trees within the site would require modification of the site plan. 1.4.3.2 Wetlands Wetland Mitigation Incorporated in Proposal includes the following: Wetland Water Quantity Mitigation Water Quality Mitigation Wetland A Roof runoff by level spreader in wetland buffer; New pond near south section of remainder of surface water as concentrated flow from new Wetland A water quality pond to southwest corner of Wetland A Wetland B Two new ponds; concentrated discharge would occur at the Same facility as for water quality; southeast corner of wetland no additional water quality treatment Wetland C Compensation provided as wetland creation/restoration Not applicable adjacent to and part of Wetland B Mitigation for indirect impacts for potential water quality issues has been provided through a water quality treatment pond near Wetland A (see Section 3.2, Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality). Separate mitigation for water quantity increases to Wetland A has not been provided because the settlement agreement and design of the City -constructed detention facility assumed providing detention for the westerly portions of the site that naturally drain to it. Indirect impacts for water quality and quantity have been provided for Wetland B through two stormwater detention and treatment ponds. 1.4.3.3 Additional Mitigating Measures Avoidance of direct impacts to Wetland C through retention would require substantial adjustments to the parking layout and building configuration in the proposed alternative. Because of the sanctuary building's central location on the site and the circular configuration of the wetland and buffer area, retaining the wetland would be more disruptive to parking lot layout and traffic and pedestrian circulation than the proposed more linear buffer compensation areas. Reduction of groundwater recharge to Wetland B due to the location of the stormwater discharge location can be mitigated by use of facilities discharging at multiple points along the wetland buffer. Potential impacts to the wetland from erosion and sedimentation from a level spreader discharge point for stormwater discharge can be mitigated by alternative designs. Significant reduction of indirect impacts from increased water quantities would be possible through collect/reuse systems, dispersion, direct infiltration, and redistributed/retention stormwater management Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-16 November 2003 techniques. Some examples include vegetated roofing, porous pavements, rain gardens, and other active infiltration mechanisms. Decreases of groundwater recharge resulting from diversion of natural infiltration to the stormwater system can be mitigated by several techniques, including retention of additional areas of native vegetation in parking areas, collection and reuse as irrigation on site, direct infiltration to the subsurface, and/or dispersion of roof drain discharge rather than routing into the surface drainage system, use of porous pavements on driveways, parking areas, and/or sidewalks to promote infiltration and reduce effective impervious surfaces. The impacts resulting from loss of the existing buffer area south of Wetland A due to the construction of the driveway access to Pacific Highway South may be avoided or reduced by a range of options including: ■ Elimination of the proposed driveway with retention and enhancement of the existing buffer area. Traffic which otherwise would use this driveway to access or leave the site northbound on Pacific Highway South would likely be routed to the westerly driveway access to South 336th Street. • Alternatively, some buffer functions could be retained by reconfiguring and relocating the proposed driveway to provide additional separation from the wetland and the impervious surface and planting dense evergreen vegetation. This could provide shade and reduce direct line -of -sight impacts. ■ Additional reduction in buffer impacts could be provided through enhancement to remove any invasive species and provide ,plantings of vegetation with dense evergreen foliage to block some of the line -of sight impacts from vehicles on the driveway. 1.4.3.4 Mitigation of Indirect and Cumulative Impacts 336th Street Widening The Wetland A buffer displacement is not likely to be avoidable because of the existing location of the roadway and lack of options for widening and sidewalk location. Some additional buffer function could be provided by stepped retaining walls with a planting area at mid -height. This provides the potential for vegetation reaching the height of the roadway and eventually reducing line -of sight impacts from vehicles on the road. Dense planting can provide somewhat more effective buffer areas. 21st Avenue Extension The lowest level of wetland impacts could be accomplished with Option B, the westerly corridor that is largely located on existing parking lot. Option A, the widening of the existing right-of-way has the next level of wetland impact with Option C, a route to the east, creating the greatest wetland impact. Compensation for the impact could include a number of potential actions for Options A and C. These include: • Removing the stream from the existing culvert and providing a natural stream channel through the site that would allow more direct hydrologic connections to the existing wetlands and provide riparian habitat; • Rehabilitating the disturbed wetlands on the site; ■ Creating new wetlands and associated buffer areas in the southerly portion of the site; Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT- Environmental Impact Statement 1-17 November 2003 Bridging the stream with the Option C alignment to reduce somewhat the fragmentation produced by that road corridor; • Planting buffering vegetation on roadway fill slopes. The effectiveness of plantings would not be realized for a number of years as they grow and mature. 1.5 WILDLIFE, FISH, AND ENDANGERED SPECIES 1.5.1 Affected Environment The mixed second -growth forest habitat on the site provides productive habitats for wildlife species because it includes a relatively large contiguous area and has a diverse community of vegetation. However, the value of this habitat is limited by its relative isolation within the surrounding urban area. Shrub wetland conditions are present within the Wetland A (Kitts Corner Wetland) and Wetland C near the center of the site. These wetlands provide potential habitat for a variety of aquatic species, including a variety of amphibians and small mammals such as shrews. The presence of permanent standing water within Wetland A provides potential habitat for waterfowl species. This habitat has relatively low plant species and internal structural diversity and supports low wildlife species diversity. Riparian wetland habitat associated with the East Branch Hylebos Creek and Wetland B is found along the east side of the site. This habitat area on the property includes a mix of forest and shrub vegetative cover along with smaller patches of emergent wetland. This habitat type has potential for wildlife species diversity. Because of the presence of the stream, it provides potential habitat for a variety of amphibian species that might not otherwise be found on the property. Most of the species likely to be found in this habitat type are also found in forested habitats. 1.5.1.1 Terrestrial Species No protected amphibian, reptile, mammals or bird species were observed on -site. However, there are records of a bald eagle nest southeast of North Lake, a little more than 1 mile from the project area, on the east side of I-5. While the proposed project site has features that might attract use by bald eagles (e.g., presence of waterfowl prey), the overall habitat value of the site for eagles is diminished relative to more suitable alternative habitat. 1.5.1.2 Aquatic Species No endangered fish species are expected to be present in waters within or immediately adjacent to the site. The main stem of Hylebos Creek is reported to contain runs of chum salmon, Chinook salmon, coho salmon, and winter steelhead. Resident cutthroat trout are also reported to be present throughout the main stem system. Information on habitat use by these species indicates that the main stem serves largely as migration habitat for the salmon and steelhead runs identified. The West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin has identified runs of chum salmon, coho salmon, and winter steelhead. Resident cutthroat trout are also reported to be present throughout the subbasin. StreamNet data indicate that chum salmon are found downstream of the site in the West Branch Hylebos Creek from its confluence with the East Branch Hylebos Creek at about South 368th Street. WDFW Priority Habitats and Species data indicate that chum salmon use habitat from just downstream of the South 348th Street road crossing. These data conflict with the StreamNet data, and extend the distribution of chum salmon Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-18 November 2003 approximately 1 mile further upstream. There is no evidence to indicate that chum salmon are present on the proposed project site or in the adjacent Tributary 0014C. Coho salmon and steelhead are reported to use habitat into West Hylebos State Park, but not as far north as South 348th Street. There is no evidence to indicate that coho salmon or steelhead are present on the proposed project site or in Tributary 0014C. Although the detention facility is designed for fish passage, the presence of resident cutthroat trout in Tributary 0014C on the proposed project site is unlikely because of the design of the flow control structures associated with the Kitts Corner Wetland and Kitts Corner Wetland Regional Detention Facility, the culvert length under Pacific Highway South, and a lack of suitable spawning habitat. The East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin has identified runs of chum salmon in the lower half of the ravine habitat, near the Pierce County and King County line. The upstream distribution limit for coho salmon is just downstream of the Enchanted Parkway South road crossing several miles south of this site. Steelhead use Tributaries 0006 and 0015 as migration habitat. The upstream distribution limit for this steelhead is approximately'/z mile downstream from the Enchanted Parkway South road crossing. For these reasons, no endangered fish species are expected to be present in either stream in the vicinity of the site. 1.5.2 Environmental Impacts 1.5.2.1 Impacts of the Proposed Alternative Terrestrial Habitat Impacts The proposal would convert the forested area of the site into impervious surfaces, landscaping, playfield and retained stream, wetland and buffer areas. Under the proposed design, the majority of habitat available on -site for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals would be lost. No mitigation to compensate for lost wildlife habitat acreage or functions is required for, or included in the proposed design, with the exception of wetland mitigation discussed in Section 3.3 Vegetation and Wetlands. The proposed landscaping for the developed site lacks the necessary functions and values species currently found on -site require to survive, much less thrive. As a result, one should expect the majority of species associated with habitat found on -site to be displaced or destroyed by the proposed action. It is expected that amphibians and small ground -dwelling mammals would be the most substantially impacted, given their limited mobility. Aquatic Habitat Impacts Impacts on aquatic species relate primarily to indirect and cumulative impacts on watercourses and wetlands, which can influence stream nutrient dynamics and stream temperature via riparian canopy shade. Further, stream segments may become dewatered earlier or more frequently than under existing conditions, impacting aquatic biota in the project area, as well `as downstream. Fine sediment clogs streambed substrate, degrades aquatic habitat, and transfers upland pollutants into and through the stream system. There are two principal mechanisms by which the proposed project may contribute fine sediments to streams. The first is the sediment associated with stream channel erosion or Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-19 November 2003 erosion from failure of the level spreader. The second mechanism is associated with short-term construction -related ground disturbance and stockpiling of cut and fill material. Suspended sediment is associated with negative effects on spawning, growth, and reproduction of salmonids. Effects on salmonids would differ based on their developmental stage. Suspended sediments may affect salmonids by altering their physiology, behavior, and habitat, all of which may lead to physiological stress and reduced survival rates. Fine sediments and turbidity have the potential to reduce light transmission and, if chronic, suppress primary production at some level. Salmonids could be affected due to loss of suitable spawning habitat resulting from sediment infiltration. Water quality related to toxic metals and organics contamination is another impact associated with urban development which can negatively affect fish physiology, behavior, and habitat. The effects of trace metals and organic compounds may be highly toxic to aquatic organisms and can accumulate in fish and shellfish. Sources of nutrients such as nitrates and phosphates include chemical fertilizers applied to landscaped areas, lawns, and gardens; failed septic systems; soil erosion; and atmospheric deposition. Excessive nutrients in urban runoff can stimulate algal growth and cause nuisance algal blooms. Urban runoff may also contain high levels of organic matter that can lead to depleted oxygen levels in water and sediment when it decomposes. This in turn may cause excessive odors and fish kills in receiving waters. Development can raise stream temperatures as outlined in the Waterways section, above. Salmonids require cool, well -oxygenated water to survive. The maximum temperature that salmonids can tolerate varies with species, lifestage (e.g., fry, fingerling, or adult), prior acclimation, oxygen availability, duration of warmer temperature, and the presence of pollutants. Given the opportunity, juvenile and adult salmon would occupy water that is 13° to 18°C (55° to 64°F), with the warmer water selected only if excess food is available. Water temperatures of approximately 23° to 25°C (73° to 77°F) are lethal to salmon and steelhead, and genetic abnormalities or mortality of salmonid eggs can occur above 11°C (52°F) (DOE 2000). Increased water temperatures can affect feeding rates and feeding success in salmonids, as well as generally increasing metabolic stress in individuals and rendering habitat uninhabitable. 1.5.2.2 Impacts of the No-Action/Proposed Business Park Alternative The main difference between the two alternatives is the amount of impervious surface area incorporated into each design. Terrestrial habitat impacts are assumed to be nearly identical, as both alternatives would convert the majority of the site from mixed second -growth forest habitat to impervious surface area. Impacts on aquatic species relate primarily to the somewhat greater impact on groundwater infiltration, as the athletic field would be replaced with buildings, parking, and landscaping. The consequences of decreased infiltration would be similar to those for the proposal, specifically, disrupted groundwater infiltration would affect stormwater attenuation, stream baseflows, temperature and riparian and wetland vegetative communities. These effects would occur to a greater extent on the East Branch, to which the proposed athletic field drains. Assuming similar levels of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) between the two alternatives, there should be no greater risk of construction -related fugitive sediment transport associated with the business park alternative, compared with the proposed alternative. 1.5.3 Mitigating Measures Mitigating measures are -those designs, practices, and actions designed to limit, reduce, or compensate for impacts anticipated to be associated with a project. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-20 November 2003 1.5.3.1 Mitigating Measures for Terrestrial Habitat Impacts Given the severity of anticipated impacts to terrestrial habitat, there are few mitigating measures that would have appreciable effect. Still, several features to limit impacts have been incorporated in the proposal: ■ Maintenance of native vegetation and ground cover vegetation within the forested buffer zone along the northern property boundary. • Maintenance of a fringe of mixed second -growth forest habitat type as a buffer around identified sensitive habitats (i.e., East Hylebos Creek riparian zone, Kitts Corner Wetland). Other potential mitigating measures for retention of vegetation and wetlands are contained in Sections 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality) and 3.3 (Vegetation and Wetlands). Specific mitigation for wildlife may include: • Enhance connections with existing open space and habitat east of I-5 by enhancing the 336th Street underpass. • Begin ground clearing activity from the west side of the property, allowing animals to move east into the buffer zone adjacent to the East Branch of Hylebos Creek. • Time construction to avoid nesting season (i.e., late winter through early summer) for the majority of avian species. • Augment project landscaping plans to provide retention and enhancement of wildlife species through collaboration with a habitat biologist review to incorporate specific measures including but not limited to tree retention, protection and enhancement measures, and habitat -sensitive plantings and structures such as snags, within wetland and stream areas. • Place notification signs on Pacific Highway South, South 336th Street, South 341st Street, and I-5 informing motorists about the increased potential for animals crossing these roadways. As stated, none of the proposed mitigating measures would compensate for habitat destroyed by the proposed project; however, some of the measures may increase the chance of survival for wildlife displaced by project construction. 1.5.3.2 Mitigating Measures for Aquatic Habitat Impacts A number of mitigating measures identified in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality) would reduce impacts on water temperature, water quality, and streamflows that may lead to channel erosion. • Minimize impervious surface area or the effects of impervious surface area through any combination of infiltration of rooftop stormwater discharge, use of green roof construction, use of permeable surfaces for parking areas, increased number of more mature trees in parking area landscaping to, intercept precipitation, and reduced parking area through use of a multi -level garage or rooftop parking. ■ Use a greater number of smaller water quality facilities along the east side of the site (along the East Branch of Hylebos Creek) to emulate more natural infiltration and groundwater influences on the riparian area. • Ensure water quality facilities comply with Level 2 flow control requirements to reduce the risk of erosion and sediment transport. ■ Replace detention pond level spreader discharge designs for flow dispersion/infiltration trenches. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-21 November 2003 Additional mitigating measures include: ■ Use of larger trees in landscaping around detention ponds to reduce water temperature. • Routine maintenance of landscape irrigation systems to protect against over -watering and mis- application of water to reduce warm -water inputs to detention ponds. • Early morning use of irrigation watering during summer months. • Use of native vegetation in landscaping to reduce the need for irrigation watering and fertilizer supplements. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 1-22 November 2003 1 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL AND ALTERNATIVES 2.1 PROPOSAL The Christian Faith Center proposes a campus development of a church and school on a 47-acre site south of South 336th Street between Highway 99 (Pacific Highway South) and Interstate 5 (I-5) in the City of Federal Way (Figures 2-1 through 2-9). The proposal objective is to provide adequate space for the church services, ministries, and schools. 2.2 ALTERNATIVES Two alternatives are analyzed in this EIS. The major features of the alternatives are outlined in Table 2-1. Proposal: The applicant's current proposal is to build a church and school in three phases, which are proposed to be complete and occupied by 2006-2007. Analysis is based on use at full build -out. This alternative is referred to herein as "the proposal" or "the proposed alternative." A. Facilities 1. Phase I consists of a 218,63 1 -square-foot sanctuary building/school auditorium, including: — A 54,000-square-foot, 4,500-seat sanctuary/auditorium. — 164,500 square feet of meeting space, chapel, bookstore, and offices. — 1,178 parking stalls. 2. Phase H consists of: — An initial 8 1,323-s quare-foot school building. — 470 parking stalls. — 4.3 acres of recreational and play fields. 3. Phase IlI consists of a second -story 20,203-square-foot school addition. 4. Site development for all phases includes: — Construction and dedication of 20th Avenue South within the site extending from South 336th Street to South 341st Place. — Construction of frontage improvements on South 336th Street. — Site access consists of the following: > To Pacific Highway South, one driveway connection > To South 336th Street, one new roadway connection: 20th Avenue South and > One new driveway connection to South 336th Street west of 20th Avenue South > To the new 20th Avenue South: three driveways from the sanctuary site and three driveways from the school site, two of the three driveways are aligned. — Storm drainage detention and water quality facilities for the easterly portion of the site. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-1 . November 2003 — Storm drainage water quality facilities for the westerly portion of the site. (The westerly portion of the site is allowed to utilize the City -constructed detention facility near the northwest corner of the. site by terms of a pre-existing Settlement Agreement with the City.) — Displacement of 3,762 square feet of Wetland C located near the center of the proposed sanctuary/auditorium, with mitigation consisting of adding 7,520 square feet of wetland area and 11,974 square feet of wetland buffer adjacent to the existing Wetland B, which is located along the branch of Hylebos Creek in the easterly portion of the site. -- Displacement of 14,358 square feet of wetland buffer area from Wetland A in the northwestern corner of the site for driveway and water quality facilities, with 18,901 square feet of additional buffer area added along the easterly side of the wetland buffer. — A walkway connection from Pacific Highway South through the site to the church and school buildings. — Provision of 373,000 square feet of landscaping, including school playfield, a 25- foot-wide landscape area adjacent to South 336th Street, a 15-foot-wide landscape area on the south perimeter, and parking lot landscaping. B. Use 1. Church and school use includes: — Daily use of the school (Monday through Friday) for instruction and related activities, including sports. — Daily use of the church (Monday through Friday) for administrative purposes, bible studies, and the Dominion College, which is a leadership training program that meets during the day and evenings. — Church services on Wednesday evening and Sunday. — Conferences involving up to 3,000 attendees. 2. The City of Federal Way and other non -church community groups are expected to have the ability to use the facility based on specific agreements with the church. It is expected that such use would've governed b-y conditions of approval of the church and would be required to be consistent with church use and not exceed the level of impact from the church for elements such as trip generation. No -Action: This alternative would consist of two scenarios: A. No-Action/No Development Scenario: This consists of no development of the site. B. No-Action/Business Park Scenario: This no -action alternative consists of alternative development of the site as a business park under existing Business Park (BP) zoning. This alternative is referred to herein as the "Business Park Alternative" or "Business Park". This scenario presumes that the proposed church development does not proceed and an alternative development allowed by current zoning occurs on the site at a later date by a different proponent. This scenario assumes: — Construction of 20th Avenue South through the site, in the same configuration as proposed for the church. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-2 November 2003 Q AY — The same wetland setbacks and mitigation provisions as the proposed church. — Greater impervious surface, because of the lack of recreation areas, with somewhat larger open stormwater detention areas. — The same perimeter landscaping, with less parking lot landscaping because of fewer parking stalls (see below). — Development of warehouses and wholesale distribution facilities, including office and accessory retail sales. In accordance with Federal Way City Code 22.864, use is assumed to include: > 50 percent warehouse space > 30 percent office space > 20 percent accessory retail sales and service facilities — Parking: > for warehouse use at 1 space per 1,000 square feet > for office use at 1 space per 300 square feet > for limited low -density retail use at 1 space per 1,000 square feet Table 2.2-1. Statistical Description of Proposed Alternatives Elements of the Alternatives Proposed Alternative Business Park Alternative Site area 20th Avenue South extension 2,029,025 SF 46.58 acres 104,989 SF —�� 2.41 acres 345,055 SF 7.92 acres 2,029,025 SF 46.58 acres 104,989 SF -- 2.41 acres 345,055 SF 7.92 acres Wetland and buffer Detention facilities 66,681 SF 1.5 acres 93,353 SF 2.14 acres Landscaping 373,678 SF 8.6 acres 190,460 SF 4.37 acres 280,259 SF T� 6.43 acres NA 1,347 407,111 SF L 9.35 acres 798,258 SF Recreation facilities Parking spaces Parking and circulation 1,648 716,804 SF 16.46 acres Net building area 320,157 SF 218,631 SF 101,526 SF Sanctuary building NA School NA Warehouse NA Only as related to church use 399,129 SF 239,477 SF 159,652 SF Office Retail NA SF = square feet Christian Faith Center DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-3 554-2441-009 (02109) November 2003 x'•,�'•"ti •f,-'.'>" _y _-- . r- _,-.'! . -.s_r . r^=3.f•:y r qq .. rT * �"� -. %�= .. - r ___-,•� •_ice �_�'� _±,� - � - ,;_ ,..� . NL r. P. ii��`` -�•rl+ ram` �; S01 ITIA 336TH Y — CHRISTIA11 ;.,,. _ - . �. r . :•�: �:ii�';:�'..• �'�,",, •�,,, FAITH CENTER ire. �i�tt,.. �, ri T� ?--�---• CrJ ^'f^; � ,' � r ^r• ;r.3 '' i1 J. f.M�.r LL 15 r.. IC "' - '_ - F *;•i:.+ �t-� r �- fir^ S' �-'' SOUTH 38TH ST 18 im :.� it ice. s . t sk' Parametrix DATE: 10/28/03 4:08pm FILE K2441005P02T14-F02-1 SCALE IN FEET' Figure 2-1 Christian Faith Center 01 400 800 Vicinity Map I : I x.T• V;'.r._ ' .. 40 -� , rmalw,";d Al +.� n r+. .r • .;i• _ -r .. '�, '►., �.q.#'^ .s+yrW-}r*r - _ r, ,��..al Ir Oki S " I. - � •; ,- � ti. i r irk .. i"1- . � r � _ � .�`Y. r •�'s • -, - - ._ua � . ,.CA rmEtUlM gee. I, ly - �� _• ..i`. � ..p�� :HJ use � '^! - III Imo• i�I . N, - .'^'� ill P ® � •..�.,„,k-„ Figure 2-3. Site Plan Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-6 November 2003 p,{ SCHOOL AUDITORIUM 5ANCTUARY BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN Figure 2-4. Sanctuary Building First Floor Plan Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-7 November 2003 iry Fi ar'R I • ®. WXMM —a um'¢x lRZL SCHOOL AUDITORIUM / SANCTUARY BUILDING SECOND FLOOR PLAN ter---i Figure 2-5. Sanctuary Building Second Floor Plan Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-8 November 2003 TYL31 LLLVAIIVN Figure 2-6. Sanctuary Building Elevations Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-9 November 2003 •I - �' rt"iiiiiiiluiurrrruw�irrrr MM r f nrrrrrsr . ---n, — — ' �SAW NGQ SVIMO N IfM � IIDIYNY �d0 W IfY ROOF Ypl �IIO 14NIO11 �UYII IIDGf. 1�Aa. OYtl1wN Ef �04lOCpM COFWxI 1FW1100E}P. WO-9MI1111NY1 �Yyy�MS ��.R�.1N6/�� ME.JiT1Ypk aCCiNF YNNIIIENN ]! W WM G/111 FYNI IR41ES W IfONI AIY 714Q/L OC N30WYFNOICWYRt MO![.i1.�MflpRitOE ffi61010.1[Y}NINI.l YCNIFIC 110R11g1 fEAQId ua! M H➢E N!0.R tFua Ri VI/YtiOrt R'P 11[ NMIWY 1MV a wWl OP.gM .tlw�'m� w:eN. �°w�aogir.��o'p�P�w wv�iw rp �iao'rwiu MF�w F�w[.�Nnrcnm'm KS4�IR W�' 1G Wild kILARTUI AAy Ifd Y 11E W61YF hEfl' CMI p.91 IIESII 6' iH IVII. • Yam. 9LFON WG NYIi51PN91[F1W IIaOLWY51NlE YYFFWB M1IX EMM NW C NN AIN IINNIG YIOIO�C.I! fIFY4hW! i1NiE,! tt 0.II OR YfR MOVET[ Npf. YUMt A CLLY]S YYpIF1Y NiLY' NORTH —SOUTH BUILDING CROSS SECTION — HEWING WEST .ra;e.+ N pYlIC CYL I•. - Stl-O'. o as m w Figure 2-7. Sanctuary Building Cross Section Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-10 November 2003 I T I � 1 I I i ' I I I I , I , I � �170ou eaIVg FA 1p, i,.,�_'[r r --- r-- I 7 ! SCHOOL. SECOND FLOOR PLAN YML I'- 3D.-0' _— .. - I - -- I ! uc seal I 5 _ I Y '¢L'N101 I ' i _yM1� t'—j I 1 e•,rax rouxlralo� r r - •' Isn mcen . mn ryr � � SCHOOL FIRST FLOOR PLAN Figure 2-8. School Floor Plans Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-11 November 2003 .�_�1��l�--- !l�11dlIlgjlaplUlllii;.;. •;--�il�Ilillllllillll]IILIIlif1111LK31lIIHII[IIEI�� I,�! �S NORTH ELEVATION ELEVATION '_�IGLd1lllilnn!III}INllDlllllltlElllfllllllflll' '.;l:_..�-..�„�,� : O SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION Figure 2-9. School Elevations Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 2-12 November 2003 3.1 TRANSPORTATION Study Area The study area boundary for vehicular impacts is defined by locations affected by 10 or more project trips in the evening peak hour and 100 or more project trips for all other -peak periods. The area bounded by South 320th Street to the north, South 356th Street to the south, 21st Avenue Southwest to the west, and Weyerhaeuser Way South to the east defines this area. The analysis includes 41 intersections (35 existing intersections and 6 proposed access driveways) within the study area. The study area for pedestrian, bicycle and transit impacts includes the area within normal pedestrian and bicycle commuting distance and transit routes and facilities in the vicinity. 3.1.1 Existing Conditions 3.1.1.1 Transportation Network The major streets within the study area include Pacific Highway South, South 320th Street, South 336th Street, South 348th Street, South 356th Street, South 341stPlace, 20th Avenue South, 1st Avenue South, and Weyerhaeuser Way. The streets providing direct access to the project site include South 336th Street, 20th Avenue South, and Pacific Highway South. Existing traffic volumes on major streets are provided in Table 3.1-1 for the locations shown in Figure 3.1-1. Characteristics of major streets in the project vicinity include: South 336th Street. Between Pacific Highway South and Interstate 5 (I-5), South 336th Street is classified as a minor arterial street that provides east/west access from Pacific Highway South to the proposed site. In addition, it provides access to Weyerhaeuser Way, located east of 1-5, and the Weyerhaeuser office campus. Sidewalks are present intermittently on the north side of South 336th Street between 18th Avenue South and 1-5. The street has a posted speed limit of 35 mph and carries approximately 13,100 average daily trips (ADT) east of Pacific Highway South. • 20th Avenue South. 20th Avenue South is located north of the proposed development and currently terminates at South 336th Street. 20th Avenue South is a two-lane north -south minor collector with discontinuous sidewalks and gravel shoulders. The street has a posted speed limit of 25 mph and carries approximately 3,100 ADT. • Pacific Highway South. Pacific Highway South is a north -south, five -lane principal arterial located west of the site and provides access south of the site. Either shoulders or sidewalks are provided. The state route has a posted speed limit of 40 mph and carries approximately 27,500 ADT and 15,000 ADT north of and south of the Pacific Highway South/16th Avenue South intersection, respectively. • 16th Avenue South. 16th Avenue South (Enchanted Parkway or SR 161) is a north -south multi- lane principal arterial located west of the site and provides access to the south. The street is called 16th Avenue South north of SR 18 (South 348th Street). South of SR 18 it is SR 161. 16th Avenue South terminates to the north at Pacific Highway South and continues south of the project boundary. The arterial, 16th Avenue South, has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. State route 161 has a posted speed limit of 40 mph and carries approximately 19,400 ADT within the city limits. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-1 November 2003 Table 3.1-1. Traffic Volume Summary Location Total PM Peak Hour Volume (VPH) Project- Generated 2002 2007 2020 Trips (P) Growth and Proportionate Share Growth Project Project from2002 to Share of Growth from Share of 2007 Growth 2002 to 2020 Growth Al S 320th Street (west of SR 99) 2,933 3,071 2,903 0 1.05 0.00 0.99 0.00 A2 S 320th Street (SR 99 to 1-5) 3,300 3,530 3,900 22 1.07 0.10 1.18 0.04 A3 S 320th Street (east of 1-5) 2,541 2,794 3,659 19 1.10 0.08 1.44 0.02 B1 S 336th Street (west of SR 99) 2,085 2,271 2,055 52 1.09 0.28 0.99 0.00 B2 S 336th Street (east of 20th Avenue S) 1,402 1,569 1,802 90 1.12 0.54 1.29 0.23 B3 Weyerhauser Way (north of S 336th Street) 789 917 1,035 52 1.16 0.41 1.31 0.21 C1 S 341st Street (east of SR 99) 270 507 598 149 1.88 0.63 2.21 0.45 D1 S 344th Street (SR 99 to 16th Avenue S) 101 436 460 38 4.32 0.11 4.55 0.11 D2 S 344th Street (east of 16th Avenue S) 83 130 137 0 1.57 0.00 1.65 0.00 E1 SW Campus Drive (10th Avenue SW to 1st Avenue S) 2,373 2,699 2,972 38 1.14 0.12 1.25 0.06 E2 S 348th Street (west of SR 99) 2,940 2,827 3,256 66 0.96 -0.58 1.11 0.21 E3 S 348th Street (east of 16th Avenue S) 4,146 4,077 4,409 38 0.98 -0.55 1.06 0.14 F1 SW 356th Street (21st Avenue SW to 1st Avenue S) 1,684 2,104 2,227 19 1.25 0.05 1.32 0.03 F2 S 356th Street (west of SR 99) 1,681 2,024 2,251 19 1.20 0.06 1.34 0.03 F3 S 356th Street (SR 99 to 16th Avenue S) 908 1,014 1,103 0 1.12 0.00 1.22 0.00 G1 21 st Avenue SW (SW 336th Street to SW 356th Street) 1,488 1,394 1,656 7 0.94 -0.07 1.11 0.04 H1 1st Avenue S (south of S 320th Street) 1,924 2,172 2,361 14 1.13 0.06 1.23 0.03 11 9th Avenue S (S 336th Street to S 348th Street) 649 645 531 0 0.99 0.00 0.82 0.00 J1 SR 99 (S 312th Street to S 320th Street) 2,800 3,290 3,180 17 1.18 0.03 1.14 0.04 J2 SR 99 (S 320th Street to S 324th Street) 2,360 2,870 3,165 28 1.22 0.05 1.34 0.03 J3 SR 99 (S 324th Street to S 336th Street) 3,010 3,740 4,305 28 1.24 0.04 1.43 0.02 J4 SR 99 (S 348th Street to S 356th Street) 1,787 1,983 2,587 47 1.11 0.24 1.45 0.06 K1 SR 161 (S 348th Street to S 356th Street) 2,513 2,685 2,902 29 1.07 0.17 1.15 0.07 L1 17th Avenue S (south of S 324th Street) 394 574 531 81 1.46 0.45 1.35 0.59 L2 20th Avenue S (north of S 336th Street) 300 752 770 95 2.51 0.21 2.57 0.20 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-2 November 2003 ParametrIX DATE: 10/30/03 10:07am FILE: K2441009P02T08—F3-1-01 Figure 3.1-1 Traffic Volumes Locations Christian Faith Center Parametrix DATE: 10/28/03 3:57pm FILE: K2441009P02T08-F3-1-02 Figure 3.1-2 Study Intersections Christian Faith Center ■ Weyerhaeuser Way South. Weyerhaeuser Way South is a north -south multi -lane street located east of I-5. It is classified as a principal collector north of South 336th Street and a minor arterial south of 336th Street. A roundabout has recently been installed at the intersection with 33rd Place South. An additional roundabout is proposed at the current triangle intersection with South 336th Street. The roadway north of South 336th Street currently carries about 8,000 ADT. ■ South 320th Street. The multi -lane east -west principal arterial is located north of the site and provides access to Pacific Highway South, I-5, and residential and commercial areas to the east and west. Sidewalks are discontinuous. The arterial has a posted speed limit of 35 mph west of I-5, and 40 mph east of 1-5. It carries approximately 27,700 and 35,200 ADT west of and east of Pacific Highway South, respectively. • South 348th Street. The east -west principal arterial provides access to I-5 and Pacific Highway South, and to SW Campus Drive to residential areas west of the site. The arterial has a posted speed limit of 35 mph and carries approximately 26,600 ADT and 34,200 ADT west of and east of Pacific Highway South, respectively. ■ South 356th Street. The east -west principal arterial provides access to I-5, Pacific Highway South, and to commercial and residential areas west of the site. The arterial has a posted speed limit of 35 mph and carries approximately 17,300 ADT and 9,000 ADT west of and east of Pacific Highway South, respectively. ■ 1st Avenue South. The north -south multi -lane principal arterial is located west of the site. The arterial has a posted speed limit of 35 mph and carries approximately 15,800 ADT. 3.1.1.2 Traffic Operations Intersection service level analyses were conducted for the year 2002 to determine intersection operations under existing conditions. The degree of congestion or the quality of the traffic operations is rated with a level of service grade and volume to capacity ratio. Level of service (LOS) is reported which indicates the overall intersection operation. The letters A through F are used for the rating scale. The letter A represents the best (least congested) conditions, whereas the letter F represents the worst (most congested) conditions. The LOS ratings are based on the performance measure ranges identified in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) published by the Transportation Research Board. The Synchro software program was used to generate output (i.e., the delay and LOS results) for the analyzed intersections. The correlation between the intersection operations, LOS grade, and delay are detailed in Table 3.1-2. Table 3.1-2. Corresponding LOS Grade and Intersection Delay Delay (seconds/vehicle) LOS Signalized Unsignalized Intersection Operations Grade Intersection Intersection Best A 510 <_10 B >10 and <_20 > 10 and <_15 C >20 and <_35 > 15 and 25 D >35 and 555 > 25 and <_35 E >55 and <_80 > 35 and <_50 Worst F >80 > 50 Source: HCM 2000 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-5 November 2003 The delay reported for a four-way stop control or signalized intersection is defined as the average control delay and is calculated by taking a volume -weighted average of the delay of each approach. For two-way stop control intersections, the delay reported is for the approach with the worst operating conditions. The volume to capacity (v/c) ratio is reported for the worst -case movement at an intersection. A v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater indicates at least one particular movement is operating at or over capacity conditions. The existing conditions analyses were conducted for the weekday AM street peak (7:00 to 8:00 AM), PM school peak (3:00 to 4:00 PM), and PM street peak (5:00 to 6:00 PM), and Sunday between services (10:30 to 11:30 AM) and after services (12:30 to 1:30 PM). Table 3.1-3 summarizes the LOS analyses results for intersections shown in Figure 3.1-2. The following intersections currently operate at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater for any lane group during one or more of the peak periods analyzed: • South 336th Street/20th Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). ■ Pacific Highway South/South 312th Street (Weekday PM street peak). ■ South 336th Street/lst Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). + South 348th Street/lst Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). ■ 16th Avenue South(SR 161)/South 348th Street (Weekday PM school, and Sunday after services peaks). 3.1.1.3 Neighborhood Impacts The impacts to the residential neighborhood to the north and south of the site are considered because the general traffic, and trips from the site can affect the quality of life within an area. The two neighborhoods considered have somewhat different characteristics that will affect potential impacts. 20th Avenue South Neighborhood This neighborhood to the north of the site is of concern because 20th Avenue South passes through the residential neighborhood. This street is classified as a minor collector. Minor collectors are generally not expected to carry through traffic of more than 5,000 ADT. This residential area is located between the SeaTac Mall to the north of South 324th Street and South 336th Street. The mall is a major destination for trips. 336th Street is one of a limited number of east -west connections that cross I-5 and provides access to the Weyerhaeuser headquarters, which is also a major destination. 20th Avenue South, the major north -south roadway through the area provides an alternative to Pacific Highway South for north -south trips and also is a route for transit service. The connecting east -west streets, South 330th Street, South 333rd Street, and 17th Avenue South are also minor collectors. 20th Avenue South currently carries approximately 3,100 ADT. South 330th Street and South 333rd Street carry an estimated 1,100 ADT and 600 ADT, respectively. The intersections of South 330th Street/20th Avenue South and South 333rd Street/20th Avenue South are four-way stop controlled and are currently operating at LOS A for all study peak hours. South 336th Street/20th Avenue South is two-way stop controlled (with 20th Avenue South being the minor approach) and currently operates as LOS F during the weekday PM street peak hour (due to the southbound left movement delay) but operates at LOS C or better in all other peak hours. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT- Environmental Impact Statement 3-6 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary Location 1 LSR 99/West Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution 2 S 336th Street/North Access i Desired Path Distribution 3 20th Avenue S/Easti Access Driveway T _ 4 20th Avenue S/East2 Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution Desired Path Distribution 5 6 7 20th Avenue S/East3 Access Driveway 20th Avenue S/East4 Access _ Driveway- -- �, SR 99/S 312th Street Desired Path Distribution ; Desired Path Distribution _-- ---- Desired Path Distribution 8 _ S 320th Street/1st Avenue S _ Desired Path Distribution 9 S 320th Street/11th Place S Desired Path Distribution 10 SR 99/S 320th Street Desired Path Distribution 11 S 320th Street/23rd Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 12 1-5 souhbound ramps/S 320th Street Desired Path Distribution 13 1-5 northbound ramps/S 320th Street Desired Path Distribution 14 S 320th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way S. Desired Path Distribution 15 S 320th Street/Military Road S. Desired Path Distribution 17 SR 99/S 324th Street Desired Path Distribution 18 S 324th Street/17th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 19 S 330th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 20 S 330th Street/20th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 21 S 333rd Street/20th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 22 SW 336th Street/21 st Avenue SW Desired Path Distribution 23 SW Campus Drive/10th Avenue SW Desired Path Distribution 24 S 336th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 25 S 336th Street/9th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 27 SR 99/S 336th Street Desired Path Distribution 28 S 336th Street/20th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 2002 No Build HCM Synchro LOS I Delay I V/C 2007 No Build HCM !Synchro LOS I Delay V/C Weekday AM Peak 2007 w Project HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C B 1 11 1 0.23 B 14 0.40 I `.. T - - - I- ---h-- I- B 15 0.63 B 18 0.59 C 17 B 14 C _ 18 C f^ B 17 18 C 29 0.68 C 29 0.64 C 29 C 25 0.74 D 37 0.82 D 40 C 24 0.81 C 28 0.84 C 31 B 15 0.90 B 15 0.91 B 15 A 10 0.43 B 13 0.49 B 15 D 43 0.87 D 54 0.88 D F30 C 27 0.70 C 27 0.67 C B 11 0.12 B 10 0.20 B 11 C 23 0.86 C 24 0.89 C 24 A 8 0.11 A 8 0.22 A 10 A 7 0.09 A 8 0.17 A 10 C 32 0.80 C 32 0.81 C 34 B 10 0.61 B 17 0.79 B 17 E 62 0.80 C 1 35 0.91 D 1 42 C 23 0.78 C 22 0.84 C 21 C 27 0.81 C 28 0.79 C 30 C 19 0.27 B 15 0.54 C 27 0.43 0.15 0.23 I 0.14 2020 No Build HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C 2020 w Project HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C B 12 0.25 C C 17 0.43 B 15 0.15 C 17 0.24 C 1 17 0.14 0.59 C 25 0.81 C 25 0.81 0.66 C 30 0.73 C 30 0.73 0.83 C 29 0.74 C 30 0.76 0.87 C 24 0.80 C 27 0.83 0.91 B 12 0.88 B 12 0.87 0.51 B 14 0.53 B 17 0.55 0.88 D 35 0.90 D 35 0.91 0.67 B 18 0.63 B 18 0.63 0.29 B 10 0.15 B 11 0.25 0.89 C 25 0.90 C 26 0.90 0.34 A 8 0.21 A 10 0.34 0.38 A 8 0.18 A 10 0.38 0.82 D 39 0.79 D 40 0.79 0.78 C 24 0.84 C 24 0.84 0.94 C 21 0.87 C 24 0.90 0.84 B 17 0.76 B 16 0.75 0.81 C 29 0.72 C 29 0.71 0.81 T B 19 0.55 D 36 0.87 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-7 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Location Weekday AM Peak 2002 No Build 2007 No Build 2007 w Project 2020 No Build 2020 w Project HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C LOS I Delay I V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS I Delay I WC LOS Delay V/C 29 S 336th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way S.I 30 SR 99/16th Avenue S 31 16th Avenue S/S 341 st Street _ Desired Path Distribution D 38 0.98 B 18 0.51 A 7 0.52 B 12 I 0.50 1 [ Desired Path Distribution A 9 0.39 �B ; 12 0.38 Desired Path Distribution C 16 0.24 C 17 0.27 E "*' 47 _ 0.83 C 17 0.31 F 51 0.87 See 2020 PM Peak 1 Capacity Constrained Distribution P Y 20th Avenue S Extension to S 344th Street �'.;'y me.µ _ _ � - 32 20th Avenue S/S 341st Street - ..._. _ 33 SR 99/S 344th Street Desired Path Distribution - C 15 0.18 C 26 0.82 C 23 0.82 C 21 0.82 C 21 0.82 34 16th Avenue S/S 344th Street Desired Path Distribution C 18 0.28 C 23 0.57 B 17 0.79 C 29 0.61 B 12 0.75 ^35 S 348th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution D 42 0.89 D 43 0.93 D 45 0.95 D I 42 0.90 D 42 0.91 36 S 348th Street/9th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution B 11 0.66 A 4 0.46 A 3 0.50 A 6 0.55 A 6 0.55 37 . SR 99/S 348th Street Desired Path Distribution D 46 0.88 D 50 1 0.91 D 51 0.93 C 33 0.80 C 30 0.82 38 16th Avenue S/S 348th Street Desired Path Distribution D 44 0.75 D 43 0.91 D 45 0.92 C 29 0.82 C 31 0.82 39 SW 356th Street/21st Avenue SW Desired Path Distribution t 40 S 356th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path DistributionAlt 41 SR 99/S 356th Street Desired Path Distribution D 42 0.91 D 36 0.80 D 36 0.81 D 37 0.85 D 39 0.87 ue S/S 356th Street Desired Path Distribution B 14 0.30 C FO.77 20 C 21 0.80 D 35 0.86 D 35 0.86 43 Enchanted Parkway/S 356th Street Desired Path Distribution C 27 0.92 C 27 F 0.77 C 27 0.80 C 28 0.86 C 28 0.86 Scenario was analyzed under the worst case scenario only (Weekday PM Street peak for the 16th Avenue S/S. 341 sr Street Intersection). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-8 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Weekday PM School Peak 2002 2007 2007 2020 2020 No Build No Build w Project No Build w Project HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay I V/C LOS I Delay V/C LOS I Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Location 1 SR 99/West Access Driveway iDesired Path Distribution B 12 0.38 B 13 0.42 1 C 16 0.35 `: = B 15 0.41 -- I- - - - - - -- t B 13 0.30 _ B 13 0.29 - B 12 0.13 ° B 13 0.13 Y FW ' F V j ; C 19 0.20 B 14 0.20 B 15 0.13 - T I B 15 0.13 G • •, - --- -; _ r I 4 f 2 S 336th Street/North Access Driveway IDesired Path Distribution 3 20th Avenue S/East1 Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution 4 20th Avenue S/East2 Access Drlvewa ❑esired Path Distribution 5 20th Avenue S/East3 Access Drlvewa []esired Path Distribution 6 20th Avenue S/East4 Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution 7 SR 99/S 312th Street Desired Path Distribution 8 S 320th Street/ist Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution 9 320th Street/11th Place S IDesired Path Distribution 10 SR 99/S 320th Street iDesired Path DistributionJ. l l S 320th Street/23rd Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 12 1-5 souhbound ramps/S 320th Street iDesired Path Distribution- 13 1-5 northbound ramps/S 320th Street 'Desired Path Distribution 14 S 320th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way S. IDesired Path Distribution 15 S 320th Street/Military Road S. iDesired Path Distribution 17 SR 99/S 324th Street Desired Path Distribution E 64 0.95 E 70 0.92 E 72 0.94 D 46 0.9-0 D `46 0.90 �Y 18 S 324th Street/17th Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution _ E 46 0.82--1 B 14 0.41 C 17 0.55 f B 14 0.33 C 16 0.47 19 S 330th Street/1 st Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution 20 S 330th Street/20th Avenue S 'Desired Path Distribution A 8 0.17 A 9 0.28 B 11 0.40 A 9 0.30 B 104 0.41T 21 S 333rd Street/20th Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution A 8 0.13 A 9 0.28 B 11 0.41 A 9 0.30 B { 11 0.43 22 SW 336th Street/21st Avenue SW IDesired Path Distribution��. - ::;, ;;-: • • r .:,. 1 j i 23 SW Campus Drive/10th Avenue SW IDesired Path Distribution 24 S 336th Street/1st Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution = I l �.: 1 25 S 336th Street/9th Avenue S iDesired Path Distribution E 67 0.84 D 49 0.9'3 D 49 0.94 D 43 0.88 D 42 0.88 M 27 SR 99/S 336th Street ' IDesired Path Distribution C 33 0.88 C 31 0.87 C 34 0.93 C 30 0.91 C 35 0.91 28 S 336th Street/20th Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution C 19 0.33 13 18 0.58 C 27 0.77 C 20 0.54 C 34 0.83 29 S 336th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way S IDesired Path Distribution D 41 0.98 ! 1 I 30 SR 99/16th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution B 11 0.72 C 28 0.52 B 18 0.59 D 46 0.63 B 20 0.68 31 16th Avenue S/S 341st Street Desired Path Distribution C 19 0.28 D 27 J 0.55 F 147 1.20 D 529 0.61 F 169 1.26 Capacity Constrained Distribution ; . V See 2020 PM Peak 1,^See 2020 PM Peak 1 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statemenl 3-9 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Weekday PM School Peak 2002 2007 2007 2020 2020 No Build No Build w Project No Build w Project HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay WC LOS Delay I V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay WC LOS Delay WC Location 32 20th Avenue S/S 341st Street 20th Avenue S Extension to S 344th' Street 33 iSR 99/S 344th Street Desired Path Distribution C 18- 028 1 _ F _j 89 f 0.81 F 85 0.84 E 66 0.91 E 64 0.9.2 Intersection Mitigation Improvements See Mitigation s•'-" _ Discussion 2 34 16th Avenue S/S 344th Street Desired Path Distribution C 23 0.34 B 14 _ 0.67 B 16 0.67 B 17 z0.84 r B 117 T 0.86 35 S 348th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution C 33 0.82 D 36 0.80 D 36 0.85 C 35 0.81 C 35 0.83 36 S 348th Street/9th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution B 18 0.93 A 9 0.67 A 9 0.67 1 B 1141 0.87 B 13 0.87 37 SR 99/S 348th Street Desired Path Distribution D 41 0.93 D 46 0.91 D 47 0.95 D 42 0.80 D 50 0.82 38 16th Avenue S/S 348th Street Desired Path Distribution F 90 0.98 F 88 0.98 F 88 0.97 D 47 0.94 D 50 0.95 Intersection Mitigation Improvements D 53 0.97 ,'1*' 39 ESW 356th Street/21st Avenue SW Desired Path Distribution - - - - t 40 S 356th St ee r t/1st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution - - "' ' - - _ 41 R 99/S 356th Street D esired Path Distribution '' •; :a•; i _`� �� i 1 42 16th Avenue S/S 356th Street Desired Path Dis t Distribution _ -may 1.r+„•..:�., :�.. 43 (Enchanted Parkway/S 356th Street Desired Path Distribution See Mitigation discussion. HCM report not consistent with Synchro LOS report. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-10 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Weekday PM Peak 2002 No Build 2007 No Build 2007 w Project 2020 No Build 2020 w Project 2020 Business Park HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Location t SIR 99/West Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution I JB 11 0 45 -- - - - -�- - - B 12 0.50 a 12 0,50 T — - - 1 Traffic. Calming on 20th Avenue S �.. - ��.--ice... r CapaClty Constrained Distribution B 12 0-50 •, r, Traffic Calming with No Through t i B 12 .51 North-Southbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity Constrained Disiribulion) ? t i B 14 0.41 -_? } -tf - -I - I- I 1f {jh f } 2 S 336th Street/North Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution C 16 0.47 C 19 _ 0.49 Traffic Calming on 20th Avenue S yII �~ `� • C C 16 16 0.49 0.49 Capacity Constrained Distribution I r. _ _ t Taff C Calming with No Through C 16 0,49 _ ? E t-� I III ! E• North-Southbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity Constrained Distribution) �' i T BJ 12 0.29 1 3 Avenue S/East1 Access Driveway Deafred Path Distribution } E B 12 0.29 C 15 0_31 raft Calming on 20th Avenue SB 12 0.28 _ = a+j ` - .ti'",i - j } Capacity Constrained Distribution Traffic Calming with No Through North-Southbound at 20th/S 336, B 14 0.28 g 12 025 Capacity Constrained Distribution)- 4 20th Avenue S/East2 Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution E 8 11 0 07 B 11 0.10 C 16 0.28 rattle Calming on 20th Avenue S << y :. -; `, -,�' T^. I,,: • . ,- 1 _-•--• - -- ? . _..: i �. _ . _ .._—E_ .. --- .- B 11 0.10 - apacity Constrained Distribution - '.», F. r , { j ti j A 10 0.11 r Traffic Calming with No Through NorlhSouthbound at 20th/S 336 B 11 0.07 5 20th Avenue S/East3 Access Driveway (Capacity Constrained Distribution) Desired Path Distribution _ ; B 13 j 0.06 B 13 0.06 C 24 0.42 Traffic Calming on 20th Avenue S 6 13 0.06 v. I j _- r I _ _ �— -^ Capacity Constrained Distribution '' ` Traffic Calmingwith No Through 9 North-Southbound at 20th/S 336 i i i B 12 0.05 i (Capacity Constrained Dlstnbuhnn) - ' I f ,�y _ _ i s Y �B 13 0.04 ': 6 h Avenue S/East4 Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution B 13 0.04 C 22 0.28 Traffic Calming on 20th Avenue S Capacity Constrained Distribution B B 13 14 0.04 0.04 II I I T G� -_ _-- r _ raffic Calmingwith No Through 9 f i I B 12 0.03 North-Southbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity Constrained Distribution) 7 R 99/S 312th Street ]Desired Path Distribution E 72 1.10� D �I0.86 T 4s— 0,88.y Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-11 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Location Weekday PM Peak 2002 No Build 2007 No Build 2007 w Project 2020 No Build 2020 w Project 2020 Business Park HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay I WC I LOS I Delay WC I LOS I Delay I V/C LOS Delay V/c LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay I V/C Intersection Mitigation Improvements 1' D 47 0.92 D 46 l 0.91 D 46 0,91 D 46 0.92 - 8 320th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution E 60 0.97 D 47 0.93 D 47 0.93 9 S 320th Street/11 1h Place S Desired Path Distribution C 34 0.93 C 29 0.90 C 29 0.90 D 36 0.95 D 36 0.95 D 37 0.95 10 SIR 99/S 320th Street Desired Path Distribution Traffic Calming on 20th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution D 1 45 0.93 0.93 D E 45 69 0.88 1.05 D E 45 73 0.88 1.05 D D 43 51 0.92 0.96 D D 43 44 0.92 0,94 D 43 0.93 = 11 S 320th Street/23rd Avenue S D 51 0,99 0.88 D 51 0.96 '^ Intersection Mitigation Improvements' Desired Path Distribution ;CJ ;31 0 994 �_: •`,.:.:i D 42 •' _ = 1 0.96 D D 51 43 0.97 0.98 C 1 30 0.87 C 30 C 30 12 1-5 southbound ramps/S 320th Street 0.88 13 1-5 northbound ramps/S 320th Street Desired Path Distribution B 17 0.93 B 16 0.91 B 16 0.91 B 18 0.93 B 18 0.93 B 18 0,93 14 S 320th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way S, Desired Path Distribution C 22 0.67 C 32 0.86 C 33 0.87 D 40 0.91 D 41 0.91 D 53 0.96 Traffic Calming on 20th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution D 41 0.91 15 S 320th Street/Military Road S. D 43 0.98 D 40 0.93 D 40 0.93 D 39 0.89 D 39 0.89 D 40 0.89 17 SR 99/S 324th Street Desired Path Distribution D 50 0.99 D 53 PO.97 D 54 0.97 D 37 0.96 D 38 0.96 D 40 _ 0.98 raffic Calming on 20th Avenue S - ,%Z7 D 37 0.98 18 3 324th Street/17th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution C 22 0.43 B 14 0.39 C 15 0.44 B 14 0.33 B 15 0.36 1 C 16 ^� 0.46 19 3 330th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution C 27 0.95 C 33 0.95 C 33 1 0,95 D 40 0.97 D 41 0.98 D 42 0.98 20 S 330th Street/20th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution A 8 0.23 B 11 0,43 B 12 1 0.48 B 11 0.42 B 11 0.46 B 12 0.55 21 3 333rd Street/20th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution A 8 0.23 B 10 0.39 B 11 0.43 B 11 0.41 B 11 0.45 B 12 0.54 22 SW 336th Street/21st Avenue SW Desired Path Distribution D 49 0.94 D 51 0.96 D 52 0.96 E 55 0.97 E 56 0.97 E 57 0.99 23 SW Campus Drive/1 Oth Avenue SW Desired Path Distribution E 70 0.93 D 49 0.95 D 49 0.95 D 43 0.96 D 43 0.96 D 45 0.98 24 S 336th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution F 134 0.94 F 103 0.89 F 112 0.90 D 38 0.91 D 41 0.94 D 43 0.95 Intersection Mitigation Improvements C 31 0.92 C 34 0,86 D 37 0.89 ` J - W 25 8 336th Street/9th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution C 34 0.87 C 31 0.78 C 30 0,78 C 31 0.79 27 SIR 99/S 336th Street Desired Path Distribution D 45 j; 0.98 D _ 45 0.92 p 45 0.93 D 38 0.97 f^ -• D 39 0,97 D J 44 0,97 _ _ w D 46 + 0.911 Traffic Calming on 20th Avenue S ''�' r` jam: ;w.k`� _ • i '+ i; • •ti ,:�f�: _;`�, ti%�� :., 1'4.�� •: }r.'n _�, f •,•:: y. D 46 Capacity Constrained Distribution raffic Calming with No Through North-Southbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity Constrained Distribution) F 76 0.81 C D D 47 43 0.92 28 336th Street/20th Avenue S besired Path Distribution 21 0.81 C 24 0.81 C 28 0.85 C 31 0.80 ,Traffic Calming on 20th Avenue S apacity Constrained Distribution C C 1 27 34 1 0.74 0.76 _ } Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT- Environmental Impact Statement 3-12 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Location Weekday PM Peak 2002 No Build 2007 No Build 2007 w Project 2020 No Build 2020 w Project 2020 Business Park HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS I Delay I WC LOS I Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C fiC Calming with No Through rNo,'th-Southboundat 20th/S 336 pacity Constrained Distribution) C28 084 1 - - -- T -...., --- -- --- - -- -- �...- C ! 30 0.97 29 S 336th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way S Desired Path Distribution 30 SR 99/16th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution B i 13- 0.79 B 16 0-510-51 B 18 1 0.54 1 C 33 0.86 C 22 -0.78 B 17 0.80� raffie Calming on 20th Avenue S f j ` s _-� w W __ ,� T t �• !! �' E C 1 24 0.47 '�- D 35"--[.-. 0.71 F 59 0.90 E 43 0-81 I_ _See 2020 PM Peak 1 i { - _ _ a vv ; _ _ C _ 18� 0.32 �D 1 53 0.84 D 53- IA 0.86 D y 41 0 88 B C C 19 21 32 0,77 0,81 0.86 f _ Capacity Constrained Distribution Traffic Calming with No Through North-Southbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity Constrained Distribution) 31 16th Avenue S/S 341 st Street Desired Path Distribution F 78 1.00 F 385 1.78 w Capacity Constrained Distribution E 50 0.86 20th Avenue S Extension to S 344th Street E 49 0 86 ` I �i ! D l T 42 0.90_ -_ 32 20th Avenue S/S 341st Street 20th Avenue S Extension to S 344th Street B 11 0.53 33 SR 99/S 344th Street Desired Path Distribution D 42 0.88 apaelty Constrained Distribution ' C 32 0.88 34 16th Avenue S/S 344th Street Desired Path Distribution Capacity Constrained Distribution C 23 0.38 - I _ _ B 12 0.78 B 1 12 i 0.78 T I _B i - 13 ` 47 0-87 i .-..- B B 12 14 0-88 0.88 A 9 f f- 0.73 201h Avenue S Extension to S 344th Street _ 0.91 B 14 0.89 35 S 348th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution E 61 1.02 D 54 0.98 E 55 0.99 _ D D 47 0.91 D 47 0.91 36 8 348th Street/9th Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution B 19 0.92 B 19 0.84 B 19 0.84 B 17 0.87 B 17 0.87 B 17 0.87 37 SR 99/S 348th Street IDesired Path Distribution D 47 0.98 D 38 0.90 D 40 0.92 C 35 0.84 D 36 0.84 D 40 0.87 38 '16th Avenue S/S 348th Street JDesired Path Distribution E 71 0.98 E 73 0.99 E 73 0.99 D 44 0-96 0.92 D 41 0.93 39 W 356th Street/21st Avenue SW Desired Path Distribution C 30 0.92 D 50 0.98 D 50 0.97 D 45 0.97 U7 D 47 0.98 40 356th Street/1 st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution D 45 0.79 C 26 0,81 C 26 0.81 C 34 0.88 dD E45 0.87 C 33 0,87 41 R 99/S 356th Street Desired Path Distribution E 59 0.97 E 66 0,81 E 65 0,80 D 47 0.81 0,81 D 46 0.84 42 16th Avenue S/S 356th Street Des+red Path Distribution B 14 0,26 F 210 0A7 F 218 0-97 F 150 0.82 0.82 F 149 0,82 Intersection Mitigation 9 improvements - "-1 ## :° -`'`_ See Mitigation g Discussion 2 i See Mitigation Discussion 2 r�•'` a 43 Enchanted Parkway/S 356th Street IDesired Path Distribution D 46 0-97 D 43 0.97 D 43 1 0.97 C 31 0.82 C 1 31 1 0.82 C 92 0.82 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02/09) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-13 November 2003 Location 1 !SR 99/West Access Drivewe 2 IS 336th Street/North Access 3 120th Avenue S/East1 Access 4 120th Avenue S/East2 Access 5 i20th Avenue S/East3 Access 6 120th Avenue S/East4 Access 7 SR 99/S 312th Street 8 S 320th Street/1st Avenue S 9 S 320th Street/11th Place S 10 SR 99/S 320th Street 11 S 320th Street/23rd Avenue S 12 1-5 southbound ramps/S 320th 1311-5 northbound ramps/S 320th 14 S 320th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way c 15 S 320th Street/Military Road S. 17 SR 99/S 324th Street 18 S 324th Street/17th Avenue S 19 S 330th Street/1st Avenue S 20 21 S 330th Street/20th Avenue S S 333rd Street/20th Avenue S 22 SW 336th Street/21st Avenue SW 23 SW Campus Drive/101h Avenue SW 24 S 336th Street/1st Avenue S 25 S 336th Street/9th Avenue S Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution ired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution Path Distribution red Path Distribution red Path Distribution red Path Distribution red Path Distribution red Path Distribution red Path Distribution red Path Distribution red Path Distribution red Path Distribution esired Path Distribution esired Path Distribution 2002 No Build HCM Synchro LOS I Delay I WC 2007 No Build HCM Synchro LOS I Delay I V/C Sunday Gen Peak 2007 w Project HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C B 1 12 1 0.26 2020 No Build HCM Synchro LOS I Delay I V/C 2020 w Project HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C B f 12 1 0.27 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-14 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Sunday Gen Peak 2002 2007 2007 2020 2020 No Build No Build w Project No Build w Project HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C Location 27.SR 28 99/S 336th Street ID_esired Path Distribution S 336th Street/20th Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution C 22 0.53 B 11 0.13 C B 21 19 0.64 0.40 C C 27 30 0.67 0.89 B B 19 18 0.51 0.37 C C 27 32 0.50 0.91 - 29 S 336th Street/ Desired Path Distribution Weyerhaeuser Way S 11 0.33 B 17 0.54 B 13 0.42 C T 23 0.66 30 SR 99/16th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution _ B 16 0.55 Desired Path Distribution B 114_1 0.25 B 31 16th Avenue S/S 341st Street C 17 0.26 F 121 L 1.13 C 16 0.25 F 109 1.10 i See 2020 PM Peak 1 i See 2020 PM Peak 1 Capacity Constrained Distribution ; 120th Avenue S Extension to S 344th 32 20th Avenue S/S 341st Street Street _ 29 0.62 23 0.61 I C 28 0.91 C 23 0.91 33 SR 99/S 344th Street Desired Path Distribution j B f 13 0.13 C C 34 16th Avenue S/S 344th Street IDesired Path Distribution Desired Path Distribution _ C 17 J. 0.25_ A 8 0.60 A 10 0.74 A 7 0.45 AI 10 0.77 35 S 348th Street/1 st Avenue S 36FS 348th Street/9th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution 37 ISR 99/S 348th Street IDesired Path Distribution 38 1' 6th Avenue S/S 348th Street IDesired Path Distribution-�- 39 ISW 356th Street/21 st Avenue SW IDesired Path Distribution Desired Path Distribution IDesired Path Distribution (IDesired Path Distribution E ° i , I i i 40 i,5 356th Street/1 st Avenue S 41 R 99/S 356th Street 42 16th Avenue S/S 356th Street 43 Enchanted Parkway/S 356th Street IDesired Path Distribution t 3- Improvements for this intersection will be identified in the Triangle Study. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-15 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Location 1 �SR 99/West Access Driveway Desired Path Distribution lCapacity Constrained Distribution 2 IS 336th Street/North Access 3 120th Avenue S/East1 Access 4 12M Avenue S/East2 Access 5 120th Avenue S/East3 Access 6 '20th Avenue S/East4 Access 7 SR 99/S 312th Street 8 IS 320th Street/1 st Avenue S iffic Calming with No Through North- uthbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity nstrained Distribution) sired Path Distribution paclty Constrained Distribution iffic Calming with No Through North- uthbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity nstrained Distribution) sired Path Distribution parity Constrained Distribution iffio Calming with No Through North - Abound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity nstrained Distribution) sired Path Distribution parity Constrained Distribution iffic Calming with No Through North- uthbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity nstrained Distribution) sired Path Distribution parity Constrained Distribution iffic Calming with No Through North- uthbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity nstrained Distribution) sired Path Distribution parity Constrained Distribution tffic Calming with No Through North- uthbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity nstrained Distribution) sired Path Distribution sired Path Distribution Sunday Street Peak 2002 2007 2007 2020 2020 No Build No Build w Project No Build w Project HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro 11CM Synchro LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C B _ 12 I 0.28 - - --- B 13 0.31 B 13 0.38 B 14 0.38 B 13 - 0.30 It- B 14 0.32 20 0.51 D 35 0.56 • � - i � � � � �� D 25 0.58 C � -�'-�----- D 26 0.59 Ji C 22 0.51 + _ i ! { F 67 0.91 F 69 0.92 l_ - F 163 1.21 F 89 1.01 E 46 0-68 E 46 0.68 - a.- D 27 0.52 C 23 0.47 wf—_ Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-16 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Sunday Street Peak 2002 2007 2007 2020 2020 No Build No Build w Project No Build w Project HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C LOS I Delay I V/C LOS I Delay I WC LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay WC Location 9 S 320th Street/11th Place S Desired Path Distribution B I 18 0.78 B 16 0.79 B 16 0.79 B 17 0.80 B 17 0.82 10 SR 99/S 320th Street Desired Path Distribution D 1 38 0.83 D 38 0.82 D 38 0.83 D 39 0.85 D 39 0.85 11 S 320th Street/23rd Avenue S Desired Path Distribution C 34 0.85 D 52 0.97 E 72 1.00 D 40 0.96 D 42 0.96 Intersection Mitigation Improvements { ., _ Y Y D 46 0.98 I �l 12 1-5 southbound ramps/S 320th Desired Path Distribution C 23 0.83 C 30 0.91 D 38 0.99 C 24 0.84 C 26 0.88 Street B 18 0.94 B 17 0.93 B 16 0.93 B 15 0.90 B 14 0.90 13 1-5 northbound ramps/S 320th Desired Path Distribution Street 14 S 320th Street/ Desired Path Distribution A 9 0.47 B 14 0.67 C 23 0.72 B 16 0.74 C 26 0.78 Weyerhaeuser Way S. 15 17 S 320th Street/Military Road S. SR 99/S 324th Street Desired Path Distribution Desired Path Distribution D,. • 38 0.85 H '1 ` D 46 0.86 D 49 0.86 C 29 0.82 C 30 0.83 y 18 S 324th Street/17th AvenueS Desired Path Distribution C 18 0.12 B 11 0.15 B 15 0.52 B 11 0.151 B 15 19 S 330th Street/1st Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution _�,• .. f f T0.51 j- 20 S 330th Street/20th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution A 8 0.12 A 9 0.28 B 13 0.60 A 8 0.21 B 12 0.58 21 S 333rd Street/20th Avenue S IDesired Path Distribution A 8 0.12 A 8 0.24 B 13 0.60 A 8 0.25 B 13 0.61 22 SW 336th Street/21st Avenue SW (Desired Path Distribution D 39 0.85 D 38 0.86 D 40 0.87 D 45 0.86 D 46 0.84 23 SW Campus Drive/10th Avenue _ 'r-; k,. _:;{.:. _ ^:5,•k SW Desired Path Distribution _. 24 336th Street/1 st Avenue S (Desired Path Distribution25 0.70 C 28 0.70 720 0.72C 0.7227 S 336th Street/9th Avenue S Desired Path Distribution D 37 0.71 C 34 28 SR 99/S 336th Street Desired Path Distribution B 20 0.63 C 23 0.75 C 35 0.76 0.56 C 30 0.70 T Capacity Constrained Distribution C 35 0.96 Traffic Calming with No Through North D southbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity ! { 37 0.95 Constrained Distribution)I Desired Path Distribution B 13 ! 28 S 336th Street/20th Avenue S 0.20 B 19 0.54 D 38 0.91 B 19 0.52 D 38 0.92 Capacity Constrained Distribution f --� - D 54 0.94 raffic Calming with No Through North D 42 0.90 s�uthhound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity onstrained Distribution) Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-17 November 2003 Table 3.1-3. Intersection Operations Summary (continued) Location Sunday Street Peak 2002 No Build 2007 No Build 2007 w Project 2020 No Build 2020 w Project HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro HCM Synchro LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C LOS Delay V/C 29 30 S 336th Street/ Weyerhaeuser Way S SR 99/16th Avenue S (Desired Path Distribution Desired Path Distribution C B 34 13 0.92 0.65 - A 9 0.71 B _ 13 - 0.71 B - l - - F 592 2.25 C See 2020 PM Peak 1 ..ac' 17 � 0.55 B 11; 1 E; 0.67 Capacity Constrained Distribution I i . ; f -- B 16 0.67 Traffic Calming with No Through North Southbound at 20th/S 336 (Capacity Constrained Distribution) B 19 0.68 31 16th Avenue S/S 341st Street Desired Path Distribution C 17 0.31 C ! 20 0.30 - 19 0.29 -�- - - --- F 561 2.18 Capacity Constrained Distribution 1 f E 50 0.90 32 20th Avenue S/S 341st Street 20th Avenue S Extension to S 344thStreet 33 34 . R 99/S 344th Street 16th Avenue S/S 344th Street Desired Path Distribution B 14 1 0.16 E 57 0.68 C 26 0.79 C 34 0.63 C 28 0.79 Capacity Constrained Distribution Desired Path Distribution ! C 17 0.30 r A 1 6 r0.46 A 6 0.54 A 9 0.45 C B 32 10 0.68 0.55 Capacity Constrained Distribution B 10 0.53 35 8 348th Street/1st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution C 26 0.67 C 26 0.69 C 26 0.73 C 32 0.67 C 29 0.68 36 S 348th Street/9th Avenue S (Desired Path Distribution A 4 0.51 A 4 0.54 A 5 0.62 A 4 0.39 A 4 0.45 37 SR 99/S 348th Street Desired Path Distribution D 42 0.66 D 49 0.77 E 63 0.78 D 45 0.70 E 56 0.78 38 16th Avenue S/S 348th Street Desired Path Distribution F 176 1.33 F 146 1.21 F 152 1.24 E 62 1.05 E 66 1.06 F 100 1.04 - Triangle Study 3 T 38 0.82 D j 38 r 0.82 C 35 0.87 C 34 0.87 Intersection Mitigation Improvements TY D 39 40 SW 356th Street/21st Avenue SW S 356th Street/1st Avenue S Desired Path Distribution iDesired Path Distribution 41 SR 99/S 356th Street (Desired Path Distribution D 441. 0.91 42 16th Avenue S/S 356th Street Desired Path Distribution 43 Enchanted Parkway/S 356th Street Desired Path Distribution Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-18 November 2063 18th Avenue South Neighborhood This neighborhood consists of a single block of 16 single-family houses on 18th Avenue South immediately north of South 344th Street. This area, and the block containing the residences is zoned Business Park (BP) and allows a variety of light industrial uses. The residential neighborhood pre-existed the BP zoning in the area and has persisted as a single-family residential areas in the more than two decades since the area was zoned for industrial use by King County, prior to the incorporation of the City of Federal Way. 18th Avenue South right-of-way connects to the north to South 341st Street. The right-of-way was dedicated as part of the Kits Corner Business Park approved by King County in 1978. Conditions of approval of the Business Park required dedication of right-of-way to connect to the pre-existing 18th Avenue South but contained in Condition 15: "19th Avenue South shall be constructed southerly to within 50 feet of the south property line and a landscaped berm provided to temporarily prevent through traffic. (The name of the street has since been changed to 18th Avenue to conform to the general street naming pattern in the vicinity.) 3.1.1.4 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Network and Operations To assess the adequacy of pedestrian routes near Christian Faith Church, pedestrian and bicycle routes within one -quarter mile of the proposed site, as well as the routes to desirable destinations in the vicinity, were evaluated. A discussion of the factors influencing mode choice and a summary of existing pedestrian routes available follows below. Commuters generally are willing to walk about one -quarter mile from their place of origin to their destination, with 1 mile generally being the maximum limit most people would travel by foot. This indicates that most people would walk between 5 and 10 minutes to reach a destination. The majority of bicycle trips are 3 miles or less, or approximately a 15-minute bike ride. These are general parameters that represent the results of the 80th percentile of results of surveys. There are smaller numbers of more dedicated walkers and bicyclists who regularly exceed these averages (FHWA 1999). A wide variety of factors influence the willingness to use non -motorized travel modes: • Trip making. A high -quality walking and bicycling environment is likely to increase total person travel, while a poor quality environment may deter people from choosing non -motorized travel modes. • Trip location. A high -quality pedestrian and bicycling environment coupled with mixed -use development may encourage people to travel to near -by pedestrian -oriented developments rather than driving to shopping areas further away. Mode choice. Improving the quality of the travel environment may increase the number of people who walk and bicycle and decrease the propensity to drive an automobile. • Route choice. Changes in the quality of the travel environment may spur changes in the use of various routes by pedestrians and bicyclists. ■ Trip scheduling. The quality of the travel environment may vary by time of day (e.g., with changes in on -street parking regulations or non -peak -period traffic restrictions). For example, bicyclists may choose to make trips when there is less motor vehicle traffic. ■ Distribution of effects. Changes in the pedestrian and bicycling environment may vary for different segments of the population. For example, some types of improvements benefit Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-19 November 2003 recreational users while other improvements will benefit bicycle or pedestrians that choose to use non -motorized travel as their primary means of transportation (FHWA 1999). School children may walk beyond the one -quarter -mile radius when alternate travel modes are not available. It is more likely that Middle School and High School students would consider walking. The attractiveness of a destination also is likely to affect the distance students are willing to walk. The need to get to school or the attractiveness of a nearby retail area may provide additional motivation to walk. The project site is currently undeveloped and is bounded by an industrial area to the south and a predominately residential area to the north. Characteristics of the pedestrian and bicycling environment in the vicinity generally are not conducive to high levels of pedestrian and bicycle use. The walking environment is generally poor quality with sidewalks not available on many routes and high speed traffic next to pedestrian areas on major arterials. There is little or no pedestrian oriented mixed use in the vicinity. Most trips to local businesses are by automobile. There are few destinations that one would normally choose to walk to rather than drive. There are few choices of routes between destinations and no dedicated recreation trails in the vicinity. Pacific Highway South (SR99), the major arterial in the vicinity, does not currently have separate sidewalks. Pedestrians are accommodated on the shoulder which provides substantial separation between pedestrians and driving lanes. A City of Federal Way Transportation Improvement Project scheduled for completion in 2004 includes sidewalk installation in a program to widen the street and add HOV lanes. South 336th Street, between Pacific Highway South and I-5, is the major access to the site. It is classified as a minor arterial street and provides the only east -west crossing of I-5 between 320th Street and 348th Street. It is a significant part of the arterial circulation system and provides access to Weyerhaeuser Way and the Weyerhaeuser office campus east of I-5. There is a small commercial area at the corner of 336th Street and Pacific Highway south, however the current mix of uses is unlikely to be a substantial attraction for pedestrians. South 336th Street has shoulders on the south side of the street. Intermittent sidewalks are available on the north side between 180th Avenue South and I-5. A city Transportation Improvement Project scheduled for 2005 will add bike lanes and sidewalks as well as a center left turn lane. There are no separate pedestrian sidewalks or trails on 336th where it crosses under I-5. Shoulders are of standard width. 20th Avenue South is located north of the proposed development and passes through an area that is largely residential. There are sidewalks on the east side of 20th Avenue South between South 324th Street and South 330th Street. Between 330th Street and the project site, pedestrians are accommodated on the shoulder except for a short section of sidewalk on the east side of the street between 333rd and 334th Streets. SeaTac Mall is a major retail area that is located approximately 1 mile north of the site and is the major potential non-residential attraction in the area. The business park located to the south of the site has sidewalks on streets connecting to Pacific Highway South via South 341st Street. A business complex is located to the south of the site on Pacific Highway South at South 348th Street. Currently, no road connects the business park to South 336th Street. Bus stops located within one -quarter mile from the proposed site include: ■ Pierce Transit Route 501 services South 336th Street adjacent to the site. This route starts at the Federal Way Park and Ride to the north, is routed on 20th Ave immediately to the north and connects to the east and south to Weyerhaeuser Way and 28th Avenue South and eventually connects to Milton, Fife and Tacoma. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-20 November 2003 King County Metro and Pierce Transit have a bus stop on Pacific Highway South at South 336th Street. King County Metro Route 182, provides service between the Federal Way Transit Center and Northeast Tacoma. In addition, Pierce Transit Route 500 provides services from South 336th Street to Milton and downtown Tacoma, and Route 402 provides service to Milton, Puyallup, and Graham. Transit service in the area is somewhat infrequent and use is relatively light, except for express bus service during peak periods serving major employment centers such as Downtown Seattle and Tacoma. 3.1.1.5 Safety Analysis This section describes the accident characteristics and patterns that have been identified at intersections and along corridors within the analysis area. The City of Federal Way and Washington State provided the accident data for the years 1999 through 2001 used in this summary. Table 3.1-4 summarizes the locations exceeding 1.0 accidents per million vehicle miles as requested in the City of Federal Way's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses. Table 3.1-4 - Corridor Accident History Summary (January 1999 to December 2001) Accidents per Million Primary Functional Vehicle Accident Type Location Classification Miles Length (mi) (% of Total) South 320th Street (1st Avenue South to Principal Arterial Weyerhaeuser Way South) Rear End (41 %) 324th Street (11th Place South to 23rd Avenue South) Principal 1 10.0 0.7 Right Angle (28%) Collector/Minor l I Arterial South 344th Street (Pacific Highway South to 18th I Minor Collector I 13.3 0.2 Right Angle (64%) Place South) Table 3.1-5 summarizes the locations exceeding 1.0 accidents per million entering vehicles as requested in the City of Federal Way's Guidelines for the Preparation of Transportation Impact Analyses. Traffic accidents cost the City of Federal Way more than $14 million per year and the majority of those accidents are related to congestion'. A review of the accident history indicated the predominant type of accident is rear -end for mid -block and intersection locations. Right-angle collisions are the second most occurring incidents. Table 3.1-6 summarizes the composition of accident type by location type (not for specific locations) within the study area. ' City of Federal Way Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 3, Transportation Element, page III-6 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-21 November 2003 Table 3.1-5 - Intersection Accident History Summary (January 1999 to December 2001) Accidents per Million Entering Location Vehicle Primary Accident Type (% of Total) Pacific Highway South/South 312th St j 1.5 ' Rear End (35%) Rear End (55%) �T 1st Ave South/South 320th St 1.1 11th PI South/South 320th St 1.6 Rear End (47%) Pacific Highway South/South 320th St 1.6 Rear End (38%) 23rd Ave South/South 320th St 1.9 Rear End (49%) 1-5 SB Ramps/South 320th St 1.6 Rear End (65%) f Military Rd/South 320th St i No data 13th Ave South/South 324th St No data Pacific Highway South/South 324th St 1.2 Rear End (30%) 17th Ave South/South 324th St 1.2 Right Angle (50%) Approaching Turn (60%) 1st Way South/South 330th St 1.0 9th Ave South/South 336th St No data Right Angle (38%) Weyerhaeuser Way/South 336th St 1.0 G IJl 1AVe JVV[JVV J.7UM Jl IVU UdLa Table 3.1-6 — Accident Type and Frequency Summary (January 1999 to December 2001) Accident Type Percent of Total Mid -Block Intersection Rear End Right Angle Approaching Turn Side Swipe 37% 38% 17% 20% 18% 13% 13% 13% Fixed Object 7% 8% Backing 5% 4_ 6% Head On 1% 1% Pedestrian/Bi ke All Others 1 % 1 2% 1 % 3.1.1.6 Future Baseline Conditions Baseline traffic forecasts for the year 2006/2007 and the year 2020 (the planning horizon of the City's comprehensive plan) are developed from growth rates obtained in the Federal Way EMME/2 model. The network for the opening year (2006/2007) includes all planned Transportation Improvements Projects identified in the City's 6-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The 2020 horizon year network includes all planned Transportation Improvement Projects identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-22 November 2003 Methodology Traffic Demand Model The City of Federal Way travel demand model was developed as a refinement of the Puget Sound Regional Council model. The travel demand model provides forecasts of future travel demand based on projections of future land use for Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ). The land use projections for each TAZ is translated from square feet of office, commercial, and other land use and units of single and multi -family households to different types of trips using trip generation rates for each land use and household size. The next step in the process is the distribution of trip production to match the trip attractions. This is accomplished by mathematical formulas based on survey information regarding the daily frequency and distance of travel, such as for work, shopping, and school. The type of trip plus additional factors, including cost of parking, cost of transit, availability of transit service, travel time, household income, and other factors, provides the basis for calculation of the number of trips made using each travel mode (single occupant vehicle, carpools, transit, etc.). The choice people make to use a particular mode of travel is based on formulas, which reflect regional trends consistent with the Puget Sound Regional Council's traffic model. Based on the daily person trip information, a PM peak hour trip table is constructed that predicts the ends of each trip for each purpose. These trips are routed over the network of freeways and local arterials based on trip time, which includes the capacity provided by the number of lanes on each link of the road network and projected speeds. Traffic Volume Forecasts Traffic volumes were forecasted for the years 2006/2007 and 2020 based on growth factors obtained from the Federal Way EMME/2 peak hour model. Growth factors were calculated based on the difference in approach and departure traffic volumes at the study intersection between the horizon years (2006/2007 and 2020) and the model existing year. The growth factors were applied to the approach and departure volumes of existing count data to obtain forecasted 2006/2007 and 2020 approach and departure traffic volumes. For all other time periods, the PM street peak -hour approach and departure growth factors were applied to the existing off-peak count data. Intersection turn movement volumes were estimated using the forecasted approach and departure volumes applied to the existing turn movement percentages. The intersection turn movement volumes were balanced with the forecasted approach and departure volumes using the techniques described in NCHRP 255, Chapter 8. 2006/2007 Horizon Year Baseline Conditions Transportation Network The transportation network for the year 2006/2007 includes the following 6-Year Transportation Improvement Projects: • Pacific Highway South (South 312th Street to South 324th Street). Add HOV lanes and install raised median. • Pacific Highway South (South 324th Street to South 340th Street). Add HOV lanes, left turn lanes on South 324th Street, second northbound left -turn lane at South 336th Street, and install raised median. • South 336th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way. Install roundabout. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-23 November 2003 • South 348th Street (9th Avenue South to Pacific Highway South). Add HOV lanes and second northbound left -turn lane on Pacific Highway South, and install raised median and underground utilities. ■ South 320th Street/lst Avenue South. Add second northbound and westbound left -turn lanes, and widen lst Avenue South to five lanes to South 316th Street. • South 356th Street (1st Avenue South to Pacific Highway South). Widen to five lanes, and add bike lanes, sidewalks, and illumination. • South 320th Street (8th Avenue South to Pacific Highway South). Add HOV lanes, and install raised median, underground utilities, and illumination. • 16th Avenue South(SR 161)/South 348th Street. Add eastbound and westbound right -turn lanes, a third westbound left -turn lane, and a third lane on SR 161 southbound to South 352nd Street. • South 336th Street/9th Avenue South. Signal modifications. ■ South 348th Street/lst Avenue South. Add westbound and southbound right -turn lanes and second eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes. • South 336th Street/lst Way South. Add westbound right -turn lane, signal modification, and extend southbound left -turn lane. • 21st Avenue Southwest (Southwest 356th Street to 22nd Avenue Southwest). Extend two-lane collector and signal modifications. ■ South 320th Street/20th Avenue South. Add second eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes. • 1st Avenue South (South 320th Street to South 330th Street). Install raised median and improve access at South 328th Street. • South 336th Street (18th Avenue South to I 5). Widen to three lanes, and add bike lanes, sidewalks, streetlights, southbound left -turn lane, and signal at 20th Avenue South. • I-5/South 312th Street interchange. Design study to construct new interchange and extend South 312th Street from 28th Avenue South to Military Road South. ■ Pacific Highway South (SR-509 to South 312th Street). Add HOV lanes and install a raised median. • Pacific Highway South/South 324th Street. Widen to add eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes. • South 344th Street (Pacific Highway South to 16th Avenue South). Add two left turn pockets on the minor approach and signals at Pacific Highway South and 16th Avenue South. • I-5 southbound ramps/South 320th Street. Add second southbound left -turn and third right -turn lanes. • South 356th Street (Pacific Highway South to 16th Avenue South (SR 161)). Widen to five lanes, and add bike lanes, sidewalks, and illumination. The analysis also included the following intersection improvements that were not called out on the City TIP: • South 320th Street/23rd Avenue South. Channelization improvements are forecast to be needed by the City of Federal Way if the 312th Street interchange is not pursued. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-24 November 2003 ■ I-5 northbound ramp/South 320th Street. Channelization improvements are forecast to be needed by the City of Federal Way if the 312th Street interchange is not pursued. + South 320th Street/Military Road. Channelization improvements are included in the King County TIP. ■ South 348th Street/9th Avenue South. Channelization improvements would involve a change in the scope of the current TIP project. • South 356th Street/16th Avenue South. Includes installation of a signal coordinated with the South 356th Street/SR 161 intersection signal and other channelization improvements that were included in the Todd Beamer High School mitigation improvements. • South 324th Street/17th Avenue South. Includes closure of the northbound left -turn movement and other channelization improvements that are included in the SR 99 Phase I project. 2006/2007 Baseline Traffic Operations LOS analyses were conducted for the year 2006/2007 for the peak and off-peak periods (see Table 3.1-3 for analysis results). The following intersections operate at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater for any lane group in the year 2006/2007 during one or more of the peak periods analyzed: • Pacific Highway South/South 312th Street (Weekday PM street peak). • South 320th Street/23rd Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). • South 336th Street/lst Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). • Pacific Highway South/South 344th Street (Weekday PM school peaks). ■ 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Weekday PM school, and Sunday after -services peaks). ■ 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street (Weekday PM street peak). 3.1.1.7 Neighborhood Network and Operations In 2006/2007, 20th Avenue South is projected to carry approximately 6,200 ADT. South 330th Street and South 333rd Street carry an estimated 2,400 ADT and 1,200 ADT, respectively. The intersections of South 330th Street/20th Avenue South and South 333rd Street/20th Avenue South operate at LOS B or better for all study peak hours. South 336th Street/20th Avenue South operates as LOS C or better for all study peak hours. 3.1.1.8 2020 Horizon Year Baseline Conditions Transportation Network The transportation network for the 2020 horizon year includes channelization improvements at the following intersections: • Southwest 356th Street/21st Avenue Southwest ■ Pacific Highway South/South 324th Street • Pacific Highway South/South 312th Street • South 320th Street/lst Avenue South Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-25 November 2003 • South 320th Street/llth Place South • South 320th Street/23rd Avenue South • I-5 southbound ramps/South 320th Street • South 320th Street/Military Road South • Southwest 336th Street/21st Avenue Southwest • Southwest 336th Street/9th Avenue South • Pacific Highway South/South 348th Street • 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street • Pacific Highway South/South 356th Street • Pacific Highway South/South 336th Street ■ South 348th Streedlst Avenue South • 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 356th Street • Pacific Highway South/South 344th Street • 16th Avenue South/South 344th Street • 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street Traffic Operations LOS analyses were conducted for the 2020 horizon year for the peak and off-peak periods (see Table 3.1- 3 for analysis results). The following intersections operate at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater for any lane group in the year 2020 during one or more of the peak periods analyzed: • 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Sunday after -services peak). • 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street (Weekday PM street peak). Neighborhood Network and Operations In 2020, 20th Avenue South is projected to carry approximately 6,200 ADT. South 330th Street and South 333rd Street carry an estimated 2,200 ADT and 1,100 ADT, respectively. The intersections of South 330th Street/20th Avenue South and South 333rd Street/20th Avenue South operate at LOS B or better for all study peak hours. South 336th Street/20th Avenue South operates as LOS C or better for all study peak hours. Pedestrian and Transit Network and Operations The improvements relating to pedestrian operations proposed in the City of Federal Way's Comprehensive Plan (CP) include the following: • South 336th Street bike lane and sidewalk improvements would extend from 1st Way South to I-5 in order for South 336th Street to function as a Class 2 "Joint Use" roadway. The City of Federal Way defines a Class 2 facility on South 336th Street as a street with signed bicycle routes. • In accordance with the King County Metro draft 6-year Transit Plan, the City of Federal Way has listed South 336th Street as a proposed future transit route. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-26 November 2003 Safety Analysis Traffic hazards are generally related to two major parameters: • Accident exposure that increases the potential opportunities for conflicts between vehicles. This is generally expressed as a ratio between numbers of accidents and traffic volumes. A location with a large number of accidents and large traffic volumes may have a lower exposure rate than a location with fewer accidents but with lower traffic volumes. Accident rates generally increase with traffic volumes, but the increase in accidents is not proportional to the increase in volumes. This may be because of increased driver awareness in congested situations or from lower operating speeds that allow more time for correction of driving errors. Specific types of accidents, such as rear -end collisions at intersections are often related to congestion and represent cases where the density of vehicles result in accidents from momentary lapses in driver attention (FHWA 1979). • Design or Engineering Deficiencies that lead to errors in vehicle operation. These generally consists of design parameters that restrict visibility and inhibit driver ability to respond. In some cases, deficiencies may not lead to accidents at a specific location until traffic volumes increase to the point that there are enough vehicles present to result in collisions when errors occur (FHWA 1988). Current accidents in Federal Way are predominantly rear -end collisions at mid -block and intersection locations. Right-angle collisions are the second most occurring incidents. Both of these types of accidents can generally be expected to increase with increased congestion on roadways offering additional opportunities for vehicle conflict. No specific design or engineering deficiencies have been identified in existing circulation system that would lead to increases in accidents. Generally the city traffic engineering department monitors accident data and analyzes potential contributing causes in an ongoing program to identify and correct deficiencies. Planned improvements relating to bike lanes and sidewalks would improve safety for pedestrians. Other improvements, such as signalization of the 16th Avenue South/South 344th Street and Pacific Highway South/South 344th Street intersections, would improve traffic flow and reduce conflict points. 3.1.2 Impacts of the Alternative 3.1.2.1 Trip Generation of the Proposed Church and School Institutions, such as churches and schools, are subject to a wide range of factors that can affect trip generation. Trip generation for the church and school are discussed separately below. Church Trip Generation Churches and other institutions are subject to a variety of factors that affect their trip generation. As discussed below, these factors may include the characteristics of members, programs, and facilities. There are a number of factors that are likely to affect weekday trip -generation, including: ■ Number of employees. • Daytime programs, such as education, day care, shelters or other. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-27 November 2003 ■ Use of church facilities by unrelated social service agencies. Sunday trip -generation is likely to be affected by characteristics of a program, including: ■ Number of members. • Number of services. • Services provided on other days of the week. ■ Special character of services (whether music or other amenities are provided). • Special guests or events. • Whether education activities take place at the same time as services or between services. • Whether child-care services are provided. Sunday trip -generation also is affected by characteristics of members, including: • The proportion of members attending services. ■ The age structure of members, and the proportion of singles, couples, families with children, and retired persons. • The economic status of members, which can affect the transportation modes available, as well as the tendency to share rides. Trip generation also can be affected by geographic characteristics and public services, including: • The presence of residential areas in the vicinity from which members can walk. ■ The presence of sidewalks and other safe pedestrian facilities. • The availability of transit service or the provision of bus or shuttle service by the church. There are other factors that can affect the correlation of floor area (as an independent variable) and trip generation, such as: ■ The degree to which the same space is used for multiple purposes versus providing separate worship, classroom, and office space. • The extent to which programs are designed to use space sequentially, thus making greater use of a given space rather than a situation in which all uses occur simultaneously. • The extent to which facilities, such as kitchens and storage, are provided. • The extent to which construction of facilities includes space the congregation intends to "grow into" in the, future. Characteristics related to programs and characteristics of members can change over time as an organization responds to changes in the life stage of members, experiments with variety in types and timing of services, experiences changes in leadership style, and responds to changes in mission. This wide variation in trip -generation rates for churches is reflected in survey data in the Institute of Traffic Engineers, Trip Generation, Sixth Edition. Among nine studies, weekday PM peak -hour trip - generation varies from 0.21 trip to 2.10 trips per 1,000 square feet. The average rate of 0.66 per 1,000 square feet has a standard deviation of 1.01. Sunday rates for the peak hour of the generator ranged from 5.17 to 27.79 trips per 1,000 square feet. The average rate of 9.49 has a standard deviation of 6.84. Trip - Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-28 November 2003 generation data that are based on a limited number of surveys with a high standard deviation are less reliable for use in predicting trip generation of other cases. In a case such as this, the wide variation in characteristics of programs and members can also result in "confounding variables," which render the use of independent variables, such as floor area, unreliable for predicting trip generation for a specific case. For these reasons, trip -generation estimates for the Christian Faith Center have been derived based on several factors, including: ■ The church's existing programs. ■ The potential maximum capacity of facilities. • The potential for changes in membership and the timing of programs. ■ Review of other cases. Weekday Use The current uses of the church facilities during the week include: • Administrative office staff. • Dominion College. This is an adult education program that meets daily from 8:40 AM to noon from Monday through Thursday, and in the evenings from 6:30 to 8:30 on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday. • Bible Studies. Currently meet on Wednesday morning. • Wednesday evening services. Currently scheduled from 7:00 to 9:00 PM and attract approximately 40 percent of the Sunday attendance volume. For a conservative case analysis, trip generation for the current Tuesday or Thursday schedule was chosen to represent the highest AM and PM peak -hour trip generation. Although the evening church service generates a higher number of trips, the background traffic volumes on surrounding streets is approximately 30 percent lower than PM peak period volumes, resulting in lower overall traffic volumes when church trips are added, as compared to the lower church volumes added to the higher background volumes during the PM peak period. Sunday Use The Christian Faith Center program currently provides its 3,212 members with two services (9:30 AM and 11:30 AM) on Sunday. Adults and teens attend service in the sanctuary. Attendance averages 869 during the first service and 1,351 during the second service. A separate program is provided during the service for children in up to 6th grade; however, many children attend services with their families. Survey information of entering and exiting vehicles was provided by the church for a mid -July, 2003 Sunday. The entering and exiting patterns in the survey were utilized for the pattern of church attendance and the accumulation of persons and vehicles on -site. These patterns were factored using an occupancy factor for the church as discussed below. The church plans to hold a single service after opening the new facility, which would have a capacity of 4,500. In the future, however, growth in the number of members, or the preference of members and church leaders could lead to multiple services. In estimating future trip -generation for Sunday services, a methodology was employed based on the capacity of the facility and the expected patterns of use. Institute of Traffic Engineers survey data based on the floor area of other churches surveyed were not used because of the high variability. The factors considered in this evaluation include: Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-29 November 2003 • Sanctuary capacity is 4,500 seats. Use of the facility normally will be less than full capacity, except on peak days, such as Christmas, Palm Sunday, and Easter. Normally, church members are likely to perceive a use at 80 to 90 percent of capacity as nearing the comfort level for finding seating. (Throop 2000) The comfort level also relates to the size of party. A single person may not find it difficult to find a seat when the church is full while a family, that desires a block of seats together may find the lack of contiguous space to be a problem. It is at this level that planning for additional services to relieve congestion often occurs. For the purpose of this analysis, 90 percent of maximum capacity was utilized as a conservative assumption. ■ The 54,000-square-foot sanctuary can accommodate the current church membership of 3,212; however, growth in the future, or the desire to accommodate member desires for flexibility, may result in more than one service. For this analysis, one service was presumed for the 2006/2007 horizon year and two services were assumed for 2020. • The capacity of the facility, rather than the current church membership or attendance, was used to assess potential impacts for both the 2007 and 2020 horizon years. There is basis to predict the extent to which membership will grow, but there is a basis to presume that the facility would not be used in excess of its capacity. In the absence of a means to predict or regulate the number of members, it is reasonable to predict use based on capacity. ■ The trip generation of the use of the facility was based on the survey information of entering and exiting vehicles for a mid -July, 2003 Sunday correlated with church attendance. This provides a basis for deriving the entering and exiting pattern of the congregation based on the starting time of the services. The vehicle and attendance counts also correlate with occupancy factors derived from a number of studies. Average Vehicle Occupancy is the ratio of persons to vehicles. This allows relating service attendance to trip generation. . Existing survey information in Table 3.1-7 provides average vehicle occupancy (AVO) rates for several churches of various sizes in the Puget Sound area, including Christian Faith Center. These rates vary significantly between churches and for different services of a given church. It is not clear what independent factors can be identified to explain the difference in AVO, which can be applied to the current case. There are several alternative ways of interpreting the data on AVO in Table 3.1-7. The three statistical parameters shown have varying consequences in representing the potential range of possible future impacts of the proposed Christian Faith Center sanctuary. — The weighted average provides the average of all the cases, weighted for the number of attendees. This gives an average level of trip generation, but does not account for potential variability that may be encountered by this particular church. — The 50th percentile measure is similar to the weighted average. It provides a measure where half the examples are higher and half lower than the value derived. In terms of potential impacts, there is a 50 percent chance that the impacts of the proposal would be greater than this measure. In general, an average or 50th percentile measure is appropriate where there are likely to be a large number of similar cases experienced in a community. In such a case (e.g., residential uses), the large number of cases would tend to average out and the overall impacts on the community would be accurately described by using the average or similar rate. — A greater than 50th percentile measure can be used to provide a greater assurance that a given level of impact would not be exceeded. This is not a measure based on observable characteristics of the use, but presumes that there is a similar chance of any of the observed AVO levels occurring. Using higher percentile criteria provides a higher assurance that the rate chosen would not be exceeded. This provides a means to characterize the extent to which an analysis case is a "conservative case" but does not provide a means of predicting whether the presumed rate will occur. A higher percentile threshold is generally used where there is a high probability of adverse impacts if the assumption used is exceeded. For Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-30 November 2003 example, in studies of queuing impacts of parking lot and drive-in facilities, a 95th percentile measure (based on frequency) if often used because the consequences of exceeding the queue is highly adverse to the public street where backups would occur. In the case of a facility where few examples are likely to be developed in a community, the probability of a number of cases "averaging out" impacts is less. In these cases, the use of a higher percentile threshold can be justified as protecting the public by providing a greater assurance that impacts would not be exceeded. Table 3.1-7. Average Vehicle Occupancy Survey Information Average Service Trips Trips Total Trip Vehicle Church Name Time Attendees In Out Vehicles Rate Occupancy Overlake Church Kirkland Overlake Church Kirkland 8:30 1291 592 543 592 0.879 2.181 v 10:00 i 2627 761 879 0.624 3.452 Overlake Church Kirkland ^11:30 1240 477 537 _761 477 0.818 2.600 Bellevue First Presbyterian 9:30 885 424 413 424 0.946 2.087 Coal Creek Chapel 9:00 143 58 na 58 0.811 2.466 Coal Creek Chapel 11:00 201 71 na 71 0.706 2.831 Calvary Chapel Eastside 9:00 J 369 170 na 170 0.921 2.171 Calvary Chapel Eastside 11:00 366 166 na 166 0.907 2.205 Calvary_ Chapel Kent 9:30 246 69 na 69 0.561 3.565 Calvary Chapel Kent 11:00 268 72 na 72 0.537 3.722 Calvary Fellowship Olympia Calvary Fellowship Olympia Christian Faith Center SeaTac 9:00 470 128 na 128 0.545 3.672 11:00 353 92 na 92 0.521 3.837 2 services 1 2,720 1,525 1,503 3,028 0.28 1.947 For this analysis, however, the existing patterns of church attendance, factored for 90 percent occupancy of the facility was used, the combination of the survey information and a conservative occupancy percentage is likely to represent a reasonable probability of trip generation not being exceeded. Special Events Special events currently scheduled by the church include a variety of special services and conferences. The Vision Conference, which has been the largest special event, was held on a Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday in February/March of 2002; a peak attendance of 3,000 was on Thursday. Trip generation at special events depends largely on the extent to which attendees are drawn from beyond the normal automobile commuting area, in addition to the provisions made by organizers to notify attendees of parking restrictions or other reasons to share, or provisions made to obtain, off -site parking and utilize shuttle vans. The trip generation of an event with 3,000 attendees would be approximately 1,200 if all came by car with an AVO of 2.5, as is projected for church services. The impacts of project traffic on the transportation system also are affected by the hours of operation of the event. The greatest impacts are likely to occur when starting and ending times coincide with peak traffic periods on the street system. Currently, the Vision Conference is scheduled on weekdays from 8:45 AM to 3:30 PM. with a 7:30 PM church service (available at http://www.camtreat.or2/conf.am). If scheduled during these periods, special events would add a trip component, which would be approximately 30 percent greater than the normal weekday AM peak in -bound trip volumes from the school and Dominion College. It is likely that such conferences would be scheduled to begin after the school starting time; other church activities, such as the Dominion College and bible studies, would be Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-31 November 2003 suspended during the special events. Further analysis of special events is not included in this transportation analysis because of the infrequent occurrence, the wide variability of potential attendance, and the ability to mitigate impacts through scheduling, providing shuttle bus service, or other program features. Such requirements may be incorporated in the City's conditions on the proposal. 200612007 Horizon Year For the purpose of this analysis, Tuesdays and Thursdays were chosen as a conservative case. Assumptions used for weekday programs include the following: • Church employment of 147 and work hours from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM. ■ Dominion College attendance of 225, meeting from 8:40 AM to noon and 6:30 to 8:30 PM. In Table 3.1-8, weekday school and church trip -generation are combined for a total trip -generation from the site. For the purpose of this analysis, the church program in 2006/2007 is presumed to include one single Sunday service of up to 90 percent of the sanctuary capacity, or 4,050 persons. This represents a near capacity use of the facility, which could occur with an increase in the total number of members, attendance by a greater number of members than the current average, and attendance of guests. A Sunday trip -generation rate based on the survey of existing entering and exiting vehicles, factored for greater attendance was utilized to project future trip generation of 2,046trips. In this case, the absence of a second service results in only entering trips during the 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM period and only exiting trips during the noon to 1:00 PM period. 2020 Horizon Year Weekday trip -generation is assumed the same for the 2020 horizon year as for the 2006/2007 horizon year. Sunday trip generation for the 2020 horizon year presumes substantial growth in church membership and a program that includes two Sunday services, both attended at 90 percent of the sanctuary capacity, or 4,050 persons. The most conservative case would include members arriving and leaving within the same hour between services. This scenario is included in the existing survey information and is applicable to future conditions because the church agreed to enter into an agreement with the city to separate church services by at least an hour and a half which replicates the amount of overlap that was the basis of the existing survey information. School Trip -Generation School transportation characteristics are complex and are likely to be affected by a number of factors, including: • Programs offered, such as: — number and complexity of programs — class size — extra -curricular activities. • Student characteristics, such as: Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-32 November 2003 — ages served — method of recruiting — socio-economic characteristics — cultural factors — geographic service area. ■ Staff population and ratio. • Geographic context, such as: — proximity of feeder residential areas — transit service. • Programs specific to the school, such as: — class schedules — school busing or van services — parking supply and parking fees. The current school has a number of features important to trip generation, including: • The program serves all ages from pre-school through High School. • School population comes from a broad geographic area. • Before and after school day-care programs are provided. • Extra -curricular activities involve approximately 50 students, approximately 10 percent of school attendees. • No bus or other transportation services are provided; all students are picked up and delivered by parents, except some High School students who drive themselves. Based on these features and characteristics of the proposal, the following assumptions were made in assessing school trip -generation: • Capacity of the school would be approximately 900. Attendance would be distributed between grades, as is done in the existing school. • All classes would start at 8:00 AM and end at 3:30 PM. • Effective capacity on a given day would be approximately 90 percent, reflecting uneven class sizes and absentees. • Transit and walking would serve a negligible proportion of students; most students are dropped - off and picked -up at an average vehicle occupancy (AVO) of 1.5, based on current surveys of the number of students from the same family attending the school. ■ Sixty percent of High School students in grades 11 and 12 would drive, at an AVO of 1.5. • Ten percent of students would be involved in after -school activities. • One hundred students would stay after school for after -school care; they would be picked up by parents at an even rate between 3:30 PM and 4:30 PM. • The day-care capacity of 60 students would be full all day, with a 25 percent hourly turn -over between 8:00 AM and 3:30 PM. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-33 November 2003 ■ Staff population would be 60. Based on these parameters, AM peak trip -generation would be approximately 552 pick-up and drop-off trips, 56 trips by High School student drivers and passengers, and 60 staff trips. Trip generation at the end of the school day from 3:30 PM to 4:30 PM is projected to be slightly lower: 377 pick-up and drop-off trips, 38 High School student trips, and 52 staff trips because of after -school care programs and after -school activities involving 10 percent of the school population. For the PM peak - period of the street system, trip generation would be approximately 58 pick-up trips for attendees in after - school care and activities, 6 trips by High School drivers/passengers, and 6 staff trips. In Table 3.1-8, school and church trip -generation are combined for a total trip -generation from the site. Table 3.1-8. Proposal Trip Generation Mid -Day Peak PM Peak AM Peak of Generator (weekdays) Activity or Group IN OUT Total IN OUT Total IN OUT Total Weekday School Students 37 0 37 0 33 33 0 5 5 Weekday School Student 477 477 954 417 417 834 117 117 234 Pick-up/Drop-off Adjustment for -22 -22 -44 -13 -13 -26 0 0 0 shared trips 0 20 20 Weekday School 53 0 53 0 49 49 Employees _ 1 Weekday Church 56 0 56 4 16 20 0 I 14 I 14 Employees I Weekday Dominion College & 267 0 267 0 0 0 0 0 0 2-Hour Bible Study i Weekday Total 870 455 1,325 442 502 944 117 156 273 -- Sunday between services Sunday after services Sunday 2007 Single Service 0 0 0 0 0 0 444 1,602 2,046 Sunday 2020 Two Services 0 0 0 1,337 679 2,016 444 1,602 2,046 3.1.2.2 Parking Parking analysis generally uses the 85 to 90 percentile of demand to assure that parking supply provided on a site meets the demand for the majority of potential cases experienced (TTE 1999). Church Parking demand for the church is affected by the same factors as trip generation (discussed above). The projected peak Sunday parking demand of 1,266 reflects 90 percent church occupancy by 4,020 persons withentering and exiting patterns of the existing church. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-34 November 2003 Projected peak Sunday demand of 1,266 is lower than the on -site supply of 1,648 (1,178 on the church site, 470 on the school site). There are several factors that may result in higher parking demand than projected. These include: • Greater than 90 percent occupancy of the sanctuary. • Lower AVO. • Variability in entering and exiting patterns such that attendees stay on site longer and fewer attendees leave prior to the end of the service. This is more likely to occur on events like Christmas or Easter or when special programs are offered. • A change in programs to offer education classes during the later service that would encourage attendees at the earlier service to remain on site. This is less likely to lead to additional parking accumulation with an hour and a half separation between services. It is not possible to reliably assess the probability that these factors would occur. The potential results of higher parking demand consists of spillover to adjacent streets and/or properties. If spillover occurs, it is most likely to be accommodated at the following locations: • The office park, which shares the proposed driveway entrance with the church 'on Pacific Highway South (Pacific Highway South). Shared parking on this site would be 600 to 800 feet from the church building and would not meet Federal Way standards for distance to shared parking facilities. It is unlikely that these spaces would be occupied on Sunday. • On -street parking in the Business Park area to the south where South 341st Place, 21st Place South, and 18th Place South all allow on -street parking. The blocks immediately west and south of the site can accommodate approximately 120 cars with parallel parking on both sides of the street. These streets are provided with pedestrian connections to the site via 20th Avenue South, which is new, and are approximately 900 feet of walking distance from the church. This is in excess of the 500-foot standard in FWCC 22-2422(2) for distance to shared parking facilities. • The light industrial and office areas south of the site are slightly more distant but would be unlikely to be occupied on Sunday and could be used for spill -over parking. • The residential area north of South 336th Street is less likely to be used for spill -over parking on 20th Avenue South (the major gateway to the residential area is too narrow to permit on -street parking). It is likely that the church could reach formal or informal agreements with adjacent commercial properties to allow use of parking lots not used by businesses on Sunday. If necessary, reductions in parking demand could be accomplished by several means, including: ■ Self -regulation by attendees employing shared rides if parking supply is regularly exceeded. • Increases in the capacity of the parking lot through tandem parking during peak events. • Temporary parking adjacent to the school athletic field. • Off -site parking with shuttle van service. The maximum weekday parking demand of 1,361 for the evening service reflects the assumed 75 percent occupancy and 2.5 AVO. This is within the parking supply on site. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-35 November 2003 Weekdays, mid -day parking demand would be a maximum 375 for daytime church programs, plus 79 for employees. This reflects an AVO of 1.1 and is within the parking supply. School Existing parking surveys for schools generally provide parking ratios based on numbers of students; however, the large variety of factors that may affect trip generation, as discussed above, also affect parking demand. A 1993 review of parking data from multiple studies found a margin of error in matching a statistical regression with actual cases to be outside of the acceptable range of variation for most users (ITE 1999). Rather than using existing studies, parking demand has been based on the same analysis -of -use patterns, as discussed above, for trip generation. Additional assumptions must be made for student pick-up and drop-off and for visitor parking. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that 50 percent of pick- ups and drop-off trips are on site less than 5 minutes, 25 percent for 5 to 10 minutes, and 25 percent for 10 to 20 minutes. Visitor parking is difficult to predict. As a conservative estimate, it is assumed that up to 50 visitors are on site in any one -hour period. The combined pick-up and drop-off parking plus peak student -parking demand of 71, staff parking demand of 60, and peak visitor -parking of 50, results in an AM peak school -parking demand of 435. The PM school peak would be less, given the longer spread in pick-up times because of after -school care and activities. The mid -day maximum demand from staff, student, and visitor parking is likely to be approximately 120. Special events, such as school presentations by students, school theatre events, graduation ceremonies, or sporting events, are likely to include either elementary, middle -school, or high school students, but not all three groups. The maximum student population at an elementary school presentation would involve up to 600 elementary students. In a conservative case, assuming parents and friends attend in one vehicle per student, maximum parking demand could equal up to 600 additional parking spaces. Graduations are likely to include only one class of up to 100 students, and may include additional relatives and friends, but are assumed to include no more than three vehicles per student, or 300 spaces. Such events are likely to be accommodated in the church parking lot during weekdays, evenings, or weekends when other activities are not scheduled. 3.1.2.3 Trip Distribution The church and school trip -distribution is based on a modification of EMME/2 transportation demand model distribution and assignment of trips from this Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). The EMME/2 distribution is accomplished by mathematical formulas matching trip ends for various types of trips, such as work, shopping, and school, and assignment with travel time over various routes with a stochastic route choice model. This distribution was adjusted based on records from the church of the zip code of members. Three potential distributions were developed for the project. The Desire -Path Trip Distribution is shown in Figure 3.1-3 and represents the most direct route for trips to various destinations. The Capacity Constrained Trip Distribution is shown in Figure 3.1-4 and represents the capacity constraints of the intersection at South 341st Street/16th Avenue South to handle westbound to southbound left turns. This distribution changes exiting patterns from the site by shifting traffic to the north on 20th Avenue South, but does not change the overall destinations in the desire path distribution. It has been combined with the Traffic Calming Distribution below to assess the most conservative case for traffic impacts. The change in driver behavior presumed in this distribution Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-36 November 2003 may not occur evenly. Drivers may persist in the "Desire Path" distribution beyond the LOS E capacity of the intersection because they perceive the waiting time to be less than the alternative route. Operation of the intersection at capacity also may generate additional collisions. For safety reasons, a prohibition of left turns may be required. Even with that action, the Sunday after services peak traffic demand may lead to unsafe conditions at the is intersection. The Traffic Calming Trip Distribution is indicated in Figure 3.1-5 and 3.1-6. Two scenarios incorporate the potential effects of a variety of traffic calming options discussed below in Section 3.1.4.4 that could be implemented on 20th Avenue South to discourage traffic movement through the residential neighborhood to the north of the site. — The first scenario incorporates traffic restrictions such as speed humps and chicanes that are expected to reduce through traffic about 50%. — The second scenario prohibits through northbound and southbound movements at the intersection of 20th Avenue South and South 336th Street. The latter case was analyzed with the Capacity Constrained Distribution. Each of these trip distributions are used in discussion of project impacts and mitigation, below. 3.1.2.4 Year 200612007 Conditions with Project Impacts Transportation Network Traffic Volumes Traffic volumes for the PM peak period including the proposal and the Desire Path Distribution are shown in Table 3.1-1. The growth in volumes and the proportion attributable to the proposal indicate that project trips are a larger part of the growth on smaller streets in the vicinity such as 20th Avenue South. These streets are oriented to serve the nearby and serve as primary routes for traffic entering and leaving the site. The majority of traffic volume growth on 20th Avenue South is related to increases in regional trips and likely reflects the shift of trips to parallel local streets for shorter trips as larger capacity regional arterials such as Pacific Highway South experience congestion. Larger arterials such as Pacific Highway South experience smaller growth in total trips because they already are heavily loaded. The proportion of project trips on the major arterials is smaller because the total trips carried are larger. Traffic Operations The following is a summary of the LOS analyses for the church and school components of the Christian Faith Center development. The LOS analyses for the build scenarios were analyzed with the Desire Path Distribution provided by the City of Federal Way. The analyses were conducted for the year 2006/2007 during the weekday AM street -peak (7:00 AM to 8:00 AM), weekday PM school -peak (3:00 PM to 4:00 PM), weekday PM street - peak (5:00 to 6:00 PM), Sunday between services (10:30 to 11:30 AM), and Sunday after services (12:30 to 1:30 PM). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-37 November 2003 20) 30) Parametrix DATE: 11/12/03 2:09pm FILE: K2441009P02T08-F3-1-03 7%--,. WESTBOUND — 7% EASTBOUND - 7% TOTAL DISTRIBUTION DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION Figure 3.1-3 Project Trip Distribution Desired Path Christian Faith Center ISTRIBUTION IS BASED )NSTRAINTS AT THE I S. 341 ST STREET DISTRIBUTION ASSUMES DIVERT TO ROUTES TRAFFIC OPERATIONS. EFFECTS OF TRAFFIC H AVENUE S. Parametrlx DATE: 11/12/03 2:33pm FILE: K2441009P02TD8-F3-1-04 Figure 3.1-4 TOTAL DISTRIBUTION Project Trip Distribution WESTBOUND - 7% Capacity Constrained EASTBOUND — 7% DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION Christian Faith Center 2° 3°) DN IS BASED TRAFFIC )TH AVENUE T AND S. ESIRE PATH Parametrix DATE: 11/12/03 3:27pm FILE: K2441009P02T08-F3-1-05 ° Figure 3.1-5 7 �0� TOTAL DISTRIBUTION Project Trip Distribution WESTBOUND . 7% Traffic Calming, on 20th Avenue South EASTBOUND - 7% DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION Christian Faith Center 18% 3% 4% 2% 11% N S 324TH ST yam_ 18% n 42% 16% 1 %�' 3 >�co 20% S 330TH ST 2% � Q M S 333R{] 5 ~� 2% o 19% ° 0I° 12% S 336TH ST SW 336TH ST 11 % SITE c� s 19% 9% 30% a cu 50% 8% S 347ST ST DR S7 344TH ST 0 14348TH� r 26% 14% 2% 14°/° 400 18 S ST Cn 100 800 99 161 3% 4% � 4% PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION IS BASED S 3567H ST 7°/ ON THE INSTALLATION OF A DIVERTER ° AT THE INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVENUE 6% S. / S. 336TH STREET TO ELIMINATE NORTH AND SOUTHBOUND THROUGH MOVEMENTS. ALSO INCLUDES EFFECTS OF TRAFFIC CALMING ON 20TH AVENUE S. AND THE CAPACITY CONSTRAINED 4% DISTRIBUTION. ParametrlX DATE: 11/12/03 4:43pm FILE: K2441009P02T08-F3-1-06 Figure 3.1-6 7%—�* TOTAL DISTRIBUTION Project Trip Distribution WESTBOUND - 7% No North-Southbound Through Movement EASTBOUND — 7% DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION on 20th Avenue S. / S. 336th Street Christian Faith Center Table 3.1-3 summarizes the LOS grade and delay for the intersection analyses. The following intersections operate at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater for any approach in the year 2006/2007; project impacts during one or more of the peak periods were analyzed: • East-3 Access Driveway/20th Avenue South (Sunday after services peak). • Pacific Highway South/South 312th Street (Weekday PM street peak). • South 320th Street/23rd Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak and Sunday after service peak). • South 336th Street/Ist Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). • 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street (Weekday PM school and street, and Sunday between and after service peaks). • 16th Avenue South(SR 161)/South 348th Street (Weekday PM school and Sunday after services peak). Two intersections fail to meet the LOS E standard based on one potential analysis method, but not other analysis options: 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street (Weekday PM street peak). This location fails to meet the HCM LOS portion of the City standard for the 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street intersection, because the HCM calculations do not accurately account for operations of the intersection in coordination with the SR 161/South 356th Street intersection. The Synchro report indicates operations for the critical southbound movement of LOS D while the HCM report indicates LOS F with over 60 seconds of delay on this movement. At this location, it is appropriate to consider the Synchro report over the HCM report calculations, resulting in no impact. ■ Pacific Highway South/South 344th Street (Weekday PM school peak). This location fails to meet the HCM LOS portion of the City standard, because the HCM calculations do not accurately account for the right turn movement operations. The Synchro report indicates operations for the critical eastbound right -turn movement of LOS A while the HCM report indicates LOS F with over 490 seconds of delay on this movement. At this location, it is appropriate to consider the Synchro report over the HCM report calculations. Neighborhood Impacts The impacts to the residential neighborhood to the north and south of the site are considered because the general traffic, and trips from the site can affect the quality of life within an area. The two neighborhoods considered have somewhat different characteristics that will affect potential impacts. 20th Avenue South Neighborhood Impacts to the residential neighborhood to the north of the site relate primarily to 20th Avenue South, which provides access to the Church site and would experience the greatest magnitude of change as a result of the project. Increases in traffic would be perceived as a greater impact by this residential area, as compared to the commercial development along Pacific Highway South and the business park uses along Weyerhaeuser Way. The noise and associated impacts of increased traffic would be greater for the residential area. In addition, 20th Avenue South is designated as a minor collector. Minor collectors are generally not expected to carry traffic volumes greater than 5,000 ADT. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-42 November 2003 The Desire Path Trip Distribution developed for the project identifies 20th Avenue South (north of South 336th Street) as carrying 26 percent of the project traffic to and from the site. 17th Avenue South would carry approximately 23 percent of the project traffic. Two percent of project traffic would be destined to and from South 333rd Street, and one percent would be destined to South 330th Street. The daily project trips using South 333rd Street and South 330th Street would be insignificant. Specific to the year 2006/2007 and with respect to project trips, 20th Avenue South is expected to carry 7,000 ADT; South 330th Street and South 333rd Street would carry an estimated 2,200 and 1,000 ADT, respectively. This compares to current volumes of 3,100, 1,100 and 600, respectively. The intersections of South 330th Street/20th Avenue South and South 333rd Street/20th Avenue South operate at LOS B for all study peak hours. With the planned installation of a signal, South 336th Street/20th Avenue South would operate as LOS C or better during the weekday peaks and Sunday between service peak, but would degrade to LOS D during the Sunday after services peak. The project would have a greater relative impact to the neighborhood on Sunday, which corresponds with lower background traffic volumes. The weekday PM street -peak would have the greater background traffic volume, but would experience a lower impact of project traffic. The Capacity Constrained Trip Distribution does not affect the neighborhood to the north because it diverts only southbound trips. Potential impacts of the Traffic Calming Trip Distribution are discussed under Mitigating Measures in Section 3.1.4.4, below. 18th Avenue South Neighborhood No impacts to this neighborhood would occur under the Desire Path or other distribution options outlined above. Impacts and mitigation measures are discussed below under Mitigation Measures consisting of Transportation Network Alternatives in Section 3.1.4.3 where two alternative connections between South 341st and 344th Streets are discussed and in Section 3.1.4.4, Neighborhood Impact Mitigation, where impacts and mitigation measures are discussed. Pedestrian and Transit Network and Operations Assessment of pedestrian circulation is based primarily on assessment of pedestrian comfort and safety levels rather than pedestrian capacity because a very low level of pedestrian accidents is considered unacceptable. Between the years 1999 and 2001, no pedestrian or bicycle accidents were reported on South 336th Street, 20th Avenue South, and 16th Avenue South, or at the Pacific Highway South/South 336th Street intersection; however, with the increase in vehicle trips and the low volume of bicycle and pedestrian trips that would occur in this area, there is potential for non-motorized/motorized conflicts to occur in the future. These conflicts could be avoided by improving the comfort and safety of the local pedestrian circulation system. Primary pedestrian and bicycle use is likely to be by persons working at the proposed church and school and by school children and attendees at church and other activities. The residential area to the north is likely to be the origin of most pedestrian and bicycle trips. Some bicycle commuters may choose to make longer trips. School children may walk to the shopping mall via 20th Avenue South after school. The extension of 20th Avenue through the site will connect to the business complex to the south of the site that has sidewalks on both sides of the street and provides a connection to Pacific Highway South at both South Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-43 November 2003 341st Street and South 344th Street. Potential school walk routes are largely limited by nearby residential areas and would extend to the north on 20th Avenue South. It is unlikely that substantial levels of school students will walk eastbound and westbound on South 336th Street, except to access transit, because there are not residential destinations for several miles in those directions. Commuters may walk from the site to bus stops along 336th Street, 20th Avenue and Pacific Highway South. The major walking route to transit is likely to be on 336th Street where sidewalks are to be provided by the project on the south side of the street. Several pedestrian and bicycle improvements are proposed in the vicinity in the City of Federal Way Transportation Improvement Plan 2003-2008 (TIP). These improvements include the following: South 336th Street would be widened to allow for a bike lane and sidewalks on both the north and south side of the street in a TIP project scheduled for completion in 2005. The CFC proposal would provide sidewalks on the south side of South 336th Street between I-5 and the westerly project boundary. For a time period between completion of site frontage improvements and completion of the City of Federal Way project, there would be a gap in the sidewalk between the westerly boundary of the site and Pacific Highway South. In this location an existing wide shoulder would accommodate pedestrian movement. Continuous sidewalks would be built on Pacific Highway South from South 320th Street to South 340th Street. The routes where pedestrian comfort would be low and potential pedestrian/vehicle safety hazards would be present include: • 20th Avenue South north of the site accommodates pedestrians primarily on the shoulder in the vicinity of the site. Shoulder width varies, but is narrow in some cases and provides a low comforf environment for pedestrians. • 336th Street will be provided sidewalks on the south side adjacent to the project. This should provide a comfortable pedestrian environment except between the western site boundary and Pacific Highway South where pedestrians would be accommodated on the shoulder. Persons taking transit eastbound on 336th will have a more comfortable environment on the south side where stops and possibly shelters can be integrated with sidewalk design. On the north side where westbound transit would be accessed, existing transit stops utilize the shoulder with limited pedestrian comfort while waiting for the bus. Transit service is not likely to be substantially impacted by demand placed by this project. The existing transit service to the site provides reasonable connectivity to transit centers where transfers can be made to the regional transit system. Users of transit accessing the church and school are likely to largely consist of persons that happen to live within walking distance of a transit route providing service to the site. Safety Analysis As discussed above, traffic hazards can be related to two major parameters: • Accident exposure that increases the potential pool of vehicle conflicts. • Design or Engineering Deficiencies that generally lead to errors in vehicle operation. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-44 November 2003 The general increase in traffic volumes is likely to increase traffic accidents in Federal Way, but the increase attributable to the Christian Faith Center project may have no discernable relationship to the overall accident rate. No specific design or engineering deficiencies have been identified in the proposal that would lead to an increase in accidents. A potential safety concern has been identified at the church driveways accessing 20th Avenue South for Sunday peak exiting rates. The peak demand for existing trips onto 20th Avenue South is likely to result in delays and queuing into the project driveways. This does not present an operational problem for the City street, but it may lead to driver frustration by church attendees waiting to exit the site. Such frustration can lead to potentially unsafe practices such making left turns without adequate traffic gaps on 20th Avenue South. The waiting time at the intersection of South 341st Street and 16th Avenue South with the "Desire Path" distribution has inherent safety risks in the operation of the intersection beyond capacity. Over capacity operation may generate additional accidents, especially left -turn collisions. The "Capacity Constrained" distribution may self -regulate this over -capacity operation to some extent. It is not, however, possible to project with certainty that drivers will re -distribute route choice when the intersection reaches capacity. Drivers may persist in the "desired path" distribution beyond the LOS E capacity of the intersection if they perceive the driving time is shorter than the more circuitous route to the north. For safety reasons, a prohibition of left turns may be required. Such a prohibition, in turn would affect operation of the 16th Avenue South and Pacific Highway South intersection. Even with prohibition of left turns, peak traffic demand may lead to unsafe conditions at his intersection. Planned improvements relating to bike lanes and sidewalks would improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians. As discussed above, frontage improvements incorporated into the project on 336th Street and city -implemented sidewalks on Pacific Highway South will increase pedestrian safety. Other improvements, such as signalization of the 16th Avenue South/South 344th Street and Pacific Highway South/South 344th Street intersections, would improve traffic flow and reduce conflict points. Planned improvements, such as the addition of turn lanes, improve traffic flow by reducing congestion - related incidents, and the installation of a signal or roundabout would reduce conflict points. 3.1.2.5 Year 2020 Conditions with Project Impacts Transportation Network Traffic Operations The following is a summary of the LOS analyses for the church and school components of the Christian Faith Center development. The LOS analyses for the build scenarios were analyzed with the Desire Path Distribution provided by the City of Federal Way. The analyses were conducted for the year 2020 during the five study peak -hours. Table 3.1-3 summarizes the LOS grade, delay, and maximum v/c ratio for the intersection analyses. The following intersections would operate at LOS F or with a v/c ratio of 1.0 or greater in 2020 for any lane group during one or more of the peak periods: * East-3 Access Driveway/20th Avenue South (Sunday after services peak). • South 341st Street/ I6th Avenue South (All peaks analyzed). • 16th Avenue South (SR 161)/South 348th Street (Sunday after -service peak). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-45 November 2003 One intersection does not meet the LOS F standard based on the methodology used to analyze: * 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street (Weekday PM street peak). This location fails to meet the HCM LOS portion of the City standard for the 16th Avenue South/South 356th Street intersection, because the HCM calculations do not accurately account for operations of the intersection in coordination with the SR 161/South 356th Street intersection. The Synchro report indicates operations for the critical southbound movement of LOS D while the HCM report indicates LOS F with over 60 seconds of delay on this movement. At this location, it is appropriate to consider the Synchro report over the HCM report calculations, resulting in no impact. The Capacity Constrained Distribution was also analyzed for intersections where project trips would be change as compared to the Desire Path Distribution as indicated in Table 3.1-3. The baseline scenario used for the weekday PM peak and Sunday after services peak includes a conservative baseline case incorporating potential changes in the baseline and project distribution based on installation of traffic calming measures on 20th Avenue South between South 324th Street and South 336th Streets. Neighborhood Network and Operations The operation of and impact to the residential neighborhood bordered by South 336th Street to the south, Pacific Highway South to the west, I-5 to the east, and South 324th Street to the north are considered because the streets providing access to the Church are minor collectors, which are generally not expected to carry through -traffic or more than 5,000 ADT. The trip distribution for the year 2020 is unchanged from the distribution described for the year 2007; 20th Avenue South and 17th Avenue South would carry the majority of the project traffic through the neighborhood north of the site to South 320th Street and Pacific Highway South. South 330th Street and South 333rd Street would carry a small percent of project traffic destined for the neighborhood. Specific to the year 2020 and with respect to project trips, 20th Avenue South is expected to carry 7,200 ADT; South 330th Street and South 333rd Street would carry an estimated 2,200 ADT and 1,200 ADT, respectively. This compares to current volumes of 3,100, 1,100 and 600, respectively. The intersections of South 330th Street/20th Avenue South and South 333rd Street/20th Avenue South operate at LOS B for all study peak -hours. With the planned installation of a signal, South 336th Street/20th Avenue South would operate as LOS D or better during all peak periods analyzed. Similar to the impacts in 2006/2007, the project would have a greater impact to the neighborhood on Sunday, which corresponds with lower background traffic volumes. The PM street peak would have the greater background traffic volume, but would experience a lower impact of project traffic. Potential mitigating measures, including the Traffic Calming Trip Distribution is discussed in Section 3.1.4.4, below. 18th Avenue South Neighborhood No impacts to this neighborhood would occur under the trip distribution options outlined above. Impacts and mitigation measures are discussed below for mitigation measures consisting of Transportation Network Alternatives in Section 3.1.4.3 where two alternative connections between South 341st and 344th Streets are discussed and in Section 3.1.4.4, Neighborhood Impact Mitigation, where impacts and mitigation measures are discussed. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-46 November 2003 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Network and Operations Impacts on pedestrians, bicycles and transit is likely to be similar to year 2007 conditions outlined above. The major difference is that city TIP project for South 336th Street sidewalk installation and bike lane would be completed. This would provide a more comfortable walking environment to Pacific Highway South and the pedestrian and transit facilities on that corridor. The major route where pedestrian comfort would be low and potential pedestrian/vehicle safety hazards would be present would continue to be 20th Avenue South north of the site. On this corridor, pedestrians would be accommodated primarily on the shoulder, in the absence of other city projects in the meantime to upgrade the street with widened shoulders or sidewalks. Transit service impacts are likely to be similar to 2007 impacts. The proposal is unlikely to create substantial demand. Users of transit accessing the church and school are likely to largely consist of persons that happen to live within walking distance of a transit route providing service to the site. Generally, there are pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvements contained in the City of Federal Way and other agency capital programs. There will be several cycles of development and implementation of Transportation Improvement Plans in the intervening years that are likely to improve the connectivity, comfort for users, and safety of these facilities city-wide. Whether any of those improvements specifically target the site vicinity will depend on agency decision making processes. Safety Analysis The general increase in traffic volumes expected with regional growth is likely to increase traffic accidents in Federal Way. The increase attributable to the Christian Faith Center project is likely to have little discernable relationship to the overall accident rate. Currently planned improvements and plans developed in the future are likely to include additional bike lanes, sidewalks, intersection improvements and other facilities that would improve safety for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians. 3.1.3 Impacts of the Business Park Alternative Limited analysis was performed of a no -action alternative consisting of development of the site as a business park under existing Business Park (BP) zoning. This scenario presumes that the proposed church development does not proceed and an alternative development allowed by current zoning occurs on the site at a later date by a different proponent. This scenario assumes: Development of warehouses and wholesale distribution facilities, including office and accessory retail sales. In accordance with Federal Way City Code 800,00 square feet of building area is presumed to be developed on the site with uses to include: • 50 percent warehouse space, 400,000 square feet; • 30 percent office space, 240,000 square feet; • 20 percent accessory retail sales and service facilities, 160,000 square feet. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental hnpact Statement 3-47 November 2003 Trip Generation and Distribution Trip generation was derived using Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, a compendium of surveys. The Land use Code 770, Business Park, was utilized with an average PM peak hour trip generation rate of 1.29 trips per 1,000 square feet for a total of 1,030 trips. This compares with 474 PM peak hour trips projected for the church and school. This indicates that development under existing zoning would generate about twice as many trips during the weekday time period when the transportation system is most congested. The trip distribution and assignment for the Business Park alternative used the EMME/2 transportation demand model distribution and assignment of trips from this Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). This provides an assignment consistent with the methodology the city uses for transportation planning. Operational Analysis The LOS analyses for the Business Park Alternative was conducted for the year 2020 weekday PM street - peak (5:00 to 6:00 PM) to provide a perspective of the differences in impacts as compared to the Christian Faith Center proposal. Table 3.1-3 summarizes the LOS grade and delay for the intersection analyses. The final column in the table for the weekday PM Peak period presents the Business Park Alternative results. Generally, LOS is the same or worse, because of the greater number of trips generated by this alternative. The locations where LOS is worse with this alternative includes the following: • 324th Street/17th Avenue South where the Business Park PM peak LOS is C, compared to LOS B with the Christian Faith Center proposal; • 336th Street/20th Avenue South where the Business Park PM peak LOS is D, compared to LOS C with the Christian Faith Center proposal. • 341st Street/16th Avenue where the Business Park PM peak LOS is F, but with almost four times the delay, compared to LOS F operation with the Christian Faith Center proposal; Mitigation analysis was not performed for this alternative because it is intended to illustrate the difference in impacts with the proposal. Analysis of mitigation would not serve a decision -making purpose since there is no specific proposal being reviewed. 3.1.4 Mitigation The following discussion includes sections describing the measures to mitigate project impacts to the traffic operations (including local intersection and network operations), to the neighborhood, to the pedestrian and transit operations, and to safety conditions. 3.1.4.1 Traffic Operations Mitigation Mitigation of Intersection Impacts Project impacts to the traffic operations are measured in a LOS grade and volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. The City requires that those intersection operations that have project impacts are to maintain a LOS grade E or better and a v/c ratio of less than 1.0. If an intersection operates under no -build conditions at less than standard, the requirement is for the intersection with project to operate with a delay equal to or better than no build conditions. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-48 November 2003 Year 2007 The following section summarizes those intersections degrading below the City's standard, as a result of project impacts with the Desire Path Distribution, and the mitigation measures required to improve the intersection operations. Mitigation for Year 2007 Project Impacts ■ Pacific Highway South/South 312th Street (Weekday PM street peak). Add a second northbound left -turn lane. • South 320th Street/23rd Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak and Sunday after service peak). Add a second northbound right -turn lane, convert northbound through -right lane to northbound through, and add second northbound through -lane. ■ South 336th Street/lst Avenue South (Weekday PM street peak). Convert the westbound right - turn movement to protected during southbound left -turn movement. ■ 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street (All peaks). The closure of the westbound left -turn movement mitigates the intersection operations for the weekday peak periods but does not improve the Sunday street peak to standard. There are no readily available improvements at this intersection that would mitigate the demand for southbound left turns with the Desire Path Distribution. To mitigate operations in the Sunday street peak, two options are discussed below: The Capacity Constrained Distribution discussed above that routes traffic beyond the LOS E capacity of the intersection to the north. Analysis and mitigation was performed for the 2020 conditions as the most conservative case. — A connection between South 341st Street and South to South 344th Street that would allow southbound traffic to route to the 16th Avenue South/South 344th Street intersection proposed for signalization and left -turn lanes in the CIP. This is also analyzed for 2020. • 16th Avenue South(SR 161)/South 348th Street (Weekday PM school and Sunday after service peak). This intersection operates at overcapacity conditions under no -build conditions with a maximum v/c ratio of 1.24. Conditions related to the projects can be mitigated to operations better than no -build with the addition of a northbound right -turn lane. In general, the operations of this particular location should be resolved by improvements recommended in the Triangle Study. East-3 Access Driveways/20th Avenue S (Sunday after service peak). Mitigation analysis for the site access driveway onto 20th Avenue S considered a two-way left turn lane on 20th Avenue S. The southern driveway (labeled East3) accesses 20th Avenue S from both the east and the west. The two-way left -turn lane does not function as an outbound refuge lane for the west and eastbound left turn lanes because it is functioning as a north- and southbound left -turn lane. Further review of these driveway operations may be necessary. Possible solutions for the southern access driveway onto 20th Avenue South include the installation of a roundabout (would significantly displace parking stalls), signalization, or to have persons direct traffic at peak times (occurs on Sundays). Year 2020 The following section summarizes those intersections degrading below the City's standard, as a result of project impacts, and the mitigation measures required to improve the intersection operations. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-49 November 2003 Mitigation for Year 2020 Project Impacts • East-3 Access Driveway/20th Avenue South (Sunday after service peak). The operations of the site -access driveway is similar to the year 2007 (please see previous section for a description of the intersection operations). + 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street (All peaks analyzed). The closure of the westbound left - turn movement mitigates the intersection operations for the weekday peak periods but does not improve the Sunday street peak to the LOS E standard. There are no readily available improvements at this intersection that would mitigate the demand for southbound left turns with the Desire Path Distribution. To mitigate operations in the Sunday street peak, two options are discussed below: The Capacity Constrained Distribution, discussed above. This distribution recognizes the capacity constraint at the intersection of South 341st Street and 16th Avenue South. It routes southbound traffic beyond the capacity of that intersection northbound on 20th Avenue South to South 336th Street where it splits into alternative routes. This scenario results in an additional driveway access to 20th Avenue South to operate at LOS F, as described in Section 3.1.4.3, below. — A connection between South 341st Street and South to South 344th Street that would allow southbound traffic to route to he 16th Avenue South/South 344th Street intersection where signalization and left -turn capacity is to be enhanced by a proposed CIP project. This measures does not require additional mitigation at other intersections. 16th Avenue South(SR 161)/South 348th Street (Sun after service peak). The operations of this particular location should be resolved by improvements recommended in the Triangle Study. 3.1.4.2 Mitigation Through Roundabout at SR 99 and 16th Avenue South Roundabouts have increasingly been used in many countries around the world with great success. Their success is attributed to the fact that they reduce construction and maintenance costs, fuel consumption and air pollution. But, perhaps the primary reasons for their success and positive impression by the public are their reduction of traffic delays and injury accidents. Statistics indicate that roundabouts can reduce intersection injury accidents by as much as 95 percent compared to signal control. A roundabout was recently completed in Federal Way on Weyerhaeuser Way at 33rd Place South. SR 99/16th Avenue South The installation of a roundabout at the SR 99/16th Avenue South intersection would include approximately a 200-foot diameter two-lane section with a third lane that exists between the entry at SR 99 and exit on SR 99. This provides the additional capacity for the southbound SR 99 movement. The roundabout at SR 99/16th Avenue South would allow for the removal of the left -turn movement at 16th Avenue S/South 341st Street, improving safety operations in the vicinity of that intersection. Installation of such a facility at this location would be feasible from a transportation operation point of view. It would involve acquisition of land outside the current right-of-way on both the east and west sides of the current streets. South 336th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way South The installation of a roundabout at the South 336th Street/Weyerhaeuser Way South intersection would include approximately a 132-foot diameter single -lane section with a right turn lane at the Weyerhaeuser Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-50 November 2003 Way south approach. The intersection is currently signalized and operates at a LOS F and a maximum v/c ratio of 0.91 during the PM peak hour. With the construction of a roundabout, the intersection will operate with a LOS A and a maximum v/c ratio of 0.72. 3.1.4.3 Capacity Constrained Trip Distribution The Capacity Constrained Distribution recognizes the capacity constraint at the intersection of South 341st Street and 16th Avenue South. It routes southbound traffic to that intersection until it reaches the maximum loading without exceeding LOS E. Additional trips beyond that capacity (about 405 Sunday after -service trips) are routed to the north on 20th Avenue South. At South 336th Street, these trips with a final destination to the south split into two routes. Most of the trips turn left onto South 336th Street and turn left again on Pacific Highway South where they continue on the routes outlined in the Desire Path Distribution. Trips that are primarily bound to destinations to the southwest turn right on South 336th Street and continue south on Weyerhaeuser Way south, then rejoin the previous distribution. For analysis of the most conservative case for impacts on local intersections this scenario has been combined with the "Traffic Calming" Distribution discussed below in Section 3.1.4.5. It is not, however, possible to project with certainty that this trip distribution scenario will occur consistently. Drivers may persist in the "desired path" distribution beyond the LOS E capacity of the intersection if they perceive the waiting time at the intersection. of South 341st and 16th Avenue South to be less than the travel time on the alternate route. The capacity constraints for left turns out of the church driveways may also encourage drivers to turn right, to the south, to avoid the queues waiting for extended periods to turn left. Operation of the intersection of South 341st Street and 16th Avenue South beyond capacity may also generate additional accidents, especially left -turn collisions. For safety reasons, a prohibition of left turns may be required. Such a prohibition, in turn would affect operation of the 16th Avenue South and Pacific Highway South intersection. Even with prohibition of left turns, peak traffic demand may lead to unsafe conditions at his intersection. This distribution results in no additional mitigation needs at public street intersections. Two of the three project driveways onto 20th Avenue South operate at LOS F due to the increased volume of left turns in the Sunday peak -exiting hour. (The East-3 Access Driveways also fails under the Desire -Path Distribution). The two-way left -turn lane on 20th Avenue South does not function as an outbound refuge lane for the west and eastbound left turn lanes because it is functioning as a north- and southbound left -turn lane. Further review of operation of these driveways may be necessary. Possible mitigation includes installation of roundabouts (which would displace a substantial amount of parking), signalization, or provide manual control at Sunday peak times. It also is feasible not to mitigate the LOS F operations and allow northbound left turns exiting the church to back-up. Vehicles exiting the church parking lot would back up in the church driveways and would be metered out in platoons with each change in signal cycling at the 20th Avenue South/South 336th Street intersection. This would not affect the public streets, but may lead to undesirable and possibly dangerous actions by drivers frustrated by delay. For example, drivers may make left turns into traffic without adequate gaps between vehicles on the street. This might be addressed by manual traffic control at driveways. 3.1.4.4 Connection between 341st Street South and 344th Street South Providing a connection between South 341st Street and 344th Street was identified as a means to alleviate the congestion that occurs at the 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street intersection due to the westbound left turn movement. The 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street intersection is an unsignalized intersection with stop control on the South 341st Street approach. The westbound left -turn movement experiences significant delay during the peak periods with additional traffic volumes from the proposal. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-51 November 2003 Two alternative routes have been analyzed for the connection as indicated in Figure 3.1-7: 18th Avenue South, indicated in Figure 3.1-8, which currently provides a right-of-way between the two streets, but which has been blocked by a berm installed when the Kits Corner Business Park was approved in 1978. Specific analysis of potential traffic calming mitigation is discussed for this option under Neighborhood Impacts Mitigation in Section 3.1.4.4, below. • 21st Avenue South, indicated in Figure 3.1-9, For this route, three alternative alignments h, impacts on adjacent wetlands. which currently provides a 30-foot right of way. ve been evaluated in Section 3.3.4 for potential The two alternative routes have the same effects effect on the operation of the circulation system and the LOS of intersections, as presented for specific intersections in Table 3.1-3. The extension of 20th Avenue South allows southbound traffic to divert to 344th Street South. Analysis was performed for the highest trip demand case, the project trip generation scenario on Sunday. The result of diversion of trips from 341st Street South to 344th Street is that intersection operations at the 16th Avenue South/South 341st Street, improves from LOS F to LOS C while the operations at the 16th Avenue South/South 344th Street, and South 341st Street/20th Avenue South intersection slips from LOS A to LOS C. Weekday PM peak hour results remain the same: LOS B. Results are summarized in Table 3.1-3. These results presume the improvements in the city CIP are implemented. These improvements include east and west -bound left turn lanes on 344th Street at both 16th Avenue South and Pacific Highway South. 3.1.4.5 Neighborhood Impact Mitigation Two neighborhoods are the focus of potential impacts from through traffic from this project and cumulative traffic increases from regional growth: • 20th Avenue South traverses a residential neighborhood between 336th Street and 324th Street, which is the southern boundary of the Seatac Mall. This collector currently carries about 3,100 ADT. For the year 2020, 20th Avenue South is expected to carry 7,200 ADT. • 18th Avenue South is a local street through the Business Park to the south. Although the area is zoned for industrial use, a pre-existing residential neighborhood has persisted on a portion of the street. When the through street was extended to the north in 1978, a temporary barrier was placed to prevent through movement. Removal of the barrier and allowing through vehicular movement is one mitigation option considered in Section 3.1.4.3. In addition to the physical facilities discussed below, the choice of routes the members of the church use can be influenced by notices, announcements and the orientation of new members in efforts to emphasize awareness of effects on the surrounding neighborhood and the desire to be a good neighbor. Other measures that can provide incentives for general traffic to use other routes, or to travel more slowly through a neighborhood are outlined below. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-52 November 2003 -34 � • �u , q 1 � r. .�. � � ,r _ 4� co 344TH ST 7 \ 16 z 11 ! ` '-4 J 'd � �� .k �� t?s.i .� ,.` �.: ��•• k� � 'r" �{ ;mil. r ;� � C � y �ph�,��7f �. . Parametrix DATE: 11/05/03 3:12pm FILE: K2141009P02T14-F03-1-07 Figure 3.1-7 SCALE IN FEET Christian Faith Center South 341st/344th Streets 0 200 400 Connection Options 1 IL LLJ r; 1ST STD- - IS F. j S i3.4.. ST ST ; 1 r t (EXISTING BERM L. ] :r J. a } �Uw)r n [!F- < -A y.. yr Lf ` yr' _;.. ,•r�;. � r '''•kh � Parametrix DATE: 11/13/03 <. 47pm FILE- K2441009P02T14-F03-1-08 Figure 3.1-8 SCALE IN FEET Christian Faith Center 18th Avenue South 0 100 200 Alignment Option f 9� r: �•' h ,� 341 ST S T Irk _ To 41 � <1 7�:J � - K •Y •�lle2r' ti 14 t -.. tom./, r � fl- ,+ ,y`, �._� 2, f - �• � � '�,. 14 c �y +�:P'�� . fir.' ,.� �, •� �, 344TH ST , r r Parametrix DATE: 11/05/03 3:14pm FILE: K2441009P02T14—F03-1-09 LEGEND Figure 3.1-9 (G) SCALE IN FEET ® OPTION A- WIDEN EXISTING ROW Christian Faith Center OPTION B -NEW ROW TO WEST 21 st Avenue South 0 100 200 OPTION C - NEW ROW TO EAST Alignment Options Traffic Calming Measures Traffic calming is the combination of measures that reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behavior, and improve conditions for non -motorized street users. Traffic calming goals include: • Increasing the quality of life. ■ Incorporating the preferences and requirements of the people using the area (e.g., working, playing, residing) along the street(s), or at intersection(s). • Creating safe and attractive streets. • Helping to reduce the negative effects of motor vehicles on the environment (e.g., pollution, sprawl). • Promoting pedestrian, cycle, and transit use. There are four general types of traffic calming measures: vertical deflections, horizontal shifts, roadway narrowings, and closures. Vertical deflections, horizontal shifts, and roadway narrowings are intended to reduce speed and enhance the street environment for non -motorists. Closures (intersection movement diverters, diagonal diverters, half closures, full closures, and median barriers) are intended to reduce cut - through traffic by obstructing traffic movements in one or more directions. Vertical Deflections Vertical deflections are designed to change the vertical elevation of a roadway and are usually either speed humps or tables, as the wider humps are often called. When properly spaced (300 to 600 feet apart), they can effectively slow travel speed. The best applications for speed tables are residential streets with grades below 8 percent. They are not typically used on major roads, bus routes, or primary emergency response routes. In terms of effectiveness, studies have shown that speeds between humps have been observed to be reduced between 20 and 25 percent, on average; traffic volumes have been reduced, on average, by 18 percent depending on alternative routes availability; and collisions have been reduced, on average, by 13 percent on treated streets. Some communities have observed an increase in traffic noise from braking and acceleration of vehicles, particularly buses and trucks. Emergency response vehicles experience an approximate delay of between 3 and 5 seconds per hump for fire trucks and up to 10 seconds for an ambulance with a patient. Speed tables can also be used as raised mid-bl6ck pedestrian crossings. When combined with a decorative concrete treatment, they can serve as safe'and aesthetically pleasing pedestrian enhancements, as well as means to slow vehicles. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-56 November 2003 Horizontal Shifts These measures cause drivers to shift horizontally, either through traffic circles or "chicanes," which are a series of narrowings or curb extensions that alternate from one side of the street to the other forming S-shaped curves. A common tool is the traffic circle, which is a raised island, placed in an intersection, around which traffic circulates. Traffic circles require drivers to slow to a speed that allows them to comfortably maneuver around them. They are not meant to control intersection operations and are much different from roundabouts. Circles are typically located at the intersections of local or collector streets and are not IMERNEWON"d-Op- M used at intersections with high volumes of large trucks and buses. Traffic circles can be, landscaped and incorporated into "gateways" or other entrance features into neighborhoods or residential areas. Studies indicate that the presence of traffic circles has no effect on access and only a minimal diversion of traffic. Mid -block speeds can be slowed about 10 percent; intersection collisions have been reduced, on average, by 70 percent and overall collisions have been reduced by 28 percent. Chicanes can transform straight, speed -prone routes into slower, curved roadways more conducive to a neighborhood feel. There is limited available data on speed and volume reductions on roadways with this treatment, and they can impact parking and driveways. Removal of previously paved areas to create the curves can, however, eliminate impervious areas and increase landscaping opportunities. Roadway Narrowing Narrowing the roadway with through "chokers" and medians can effectively cause drivers to slow down. Chokers are mid -block curb extensions that narrow a street by extending the sidewalk or widening the planting strip. These can also serve as safe pedestrian crosswalks if so marked. Chokers are best used on local and collector streets and main roads through small communities. They work well combined with other measures, such as speed tables, raised intersections, textured crosswalks, and raised median islands. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-57 November 2003 Studies indicate that speeds have typically been reduced, on average, by 14 percent, and that there is a 20 percent reduction in volume. Chokers are preferred by many fire department/emergency response agencies to other traffic calming measures. Medians are also used to narrow a roadway. When located along a centerline, medians effectively narrow travel lanes. The narrower lane widths cause drivers to slow down. Medians can serve as mid -point refuges for pedestrians and work well when combined with crosswalks. Medians also provide landscaping opportunities and serve as a visual amenity, enhancing neighborhood identity. Closures Closures are the most drastic form of traffic calming and are typically only used when other traffic calming measures have failed to produce the desired results. There are several forms of closures, from partial to complete access closures, as follows: • Through movement diverters are a concept developed by the City of Federal Way to restrict north -south movements on 20th Avenue South at 336th Street while allowing north and southbound left turns and full east -west movements on 336th Street. This involves a diversion structure in the intersection, together with signage. The configuration of the diverter is indicated in the adjacent figure. Diversion of through trips on 20th Avenue South would primarily address northbound exiting traffic from Sunday church services. It would also divert a smaller number of trips southbound on 20th Avenue South that might be accessing the industrial area to the south. The volume of northbound traffic continuing through the intersections during weekday PM peak periods is relatively small. Southbound trips through the intersection are about half the peak hour trips. These weekday trips may also be encouraged to see alternative routes by other traffic calming methods. • Diagonal diverters are barriers placed diagonally across an intersection, blocking through movement. They are sometimes called full diverters; or diagonal road closures. ■ Half closures are barriers that block travel in one direction for a short distance on otherwise two- way streets. They are sometimes called partial closures, entrance barriers, or one-way closures (when two half -closures are placed across from one another at an intersection, the result is a semi- diverter). Full -street closures are barriers placed across a street to completely close the street to through - traffic, usually leaving only sidewalks open. They are sometimes called cul-de-sacs or dead -ends. The disadvantages of diverters and closures include effects on the connectivity of the system that may add to traffic volumes on major arterials, and concentrate traffic on a few congested intersections by limiting Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-58 November 2003 alternate routes. Short local trips may be required to take circuitous routes. Safety may be compromised by through traffic skirting the left turn barrier. These options should be evaluated in comparison to traffic calming alternatives that slow traffic rather than prohibit it and with manual traffic direction for peak Sunday services. 20th Avenue South Neighborhood The levels of traffic on this minor collector through the residential neighborhood north of the site are a concern to the local community and city decision makers. Traffic on this street in the future will include both traffic produced by the general public and trips generated by attendees at the Christian Faith Center church and educational functions. The physical traffic calming devices outlined above are the most likely measures to affect the choice of routes by the general public through increasing travel time or to affect the speed at which they travel. An advantage a new institution such as a church has is the ability to affect its employees and members route choice through communicating the desire to be a good neighbor. This can be done by a variety of communication methods including notices, announcements and inclusion in the orientation for new members. In most cases, the choice of routes along major arterials instead of through neighborhoods will have little effect on the overall trip length and members are likely to be responsive to such requests. Other management actions the church could take at peak trip generation periods such as Sunday services is providing persons to direct traffic at driveways and intersections that encourage use of the arterial routes rather than 20th Avenue South. It may be possible to increase the volume of left turns from 20th Avenue South to 336th Street with the use of a person directing traffic and encourage this movement rather than the through movement to the north that would be provided in normal signal timing. Two traffic -calming options were developed to reflect different combinations of potential measures: a) In Street Measures: This includes such in -street devices as vertical deflections, horizontal shifts, and roadway narrowings that primarily slow speeds. b) Through Movement Diverters: This concept would restrict north -south movements on 20th Avenue South at 336th Street while allowing north and southbound left turns and full east -west movements on 336th Street. This involves a diversion structure in the intersection, together with signage. In Street Measures could potentially shift both general and project traffic to alternate traffic routes, including SR 99 and Weyerhaeuser Way. Two analysis scenarios were analyzed for this set of measures, the "Desire Path' distribution and the "Capacity Constrained" distribution. Analysis was performed for both the PM peak hour and the Sunday after -service peak. With the Desire Path distribution, approximately 160 background trips and 25 project trips may potentially reroute to Pacific Highway South and Weyerhaeuser Way South due to traffic calming implemented on 20th Avenue South in the PM peak period. For the Sunday after service period, up to 160 project trips would be diverted. The Level of Service analysis in Table 3.1-1 indicates the impacts that might occur from the diversion of trips to other routes. No additional mitigation is required for the trip diversion. Roundabout analysis conducted for the South 336`h Street/Weyerhaeuser Way intersection indicates there is sufficient capacity available, operating with a maximum v/c ratio of 0.72 and LOS A under year 2020 with project conditions (without effects of traffic calming on 20th Avenue South). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT- Environmental Impact Statement 3-59 November 2003 Shifting traffic to SR 99 will cause negligible impacts to the SR 99 intersections with South 320th Street and South 324th Street (see Table 3.1-3). The project traffic potentially shifting from 20th Avenue South to SR 99 is in the magnitude of 80 vehicles per hour (PM peak hour) and increases the intersection delay at South 336th Street by 13 seconds in the PM peak hour. The South 324th Street/17th Avenue South intersection would potentially experience a decrease during the PM peak hour. The 20th Avenue South/South 330th Street and 20th Avenue South/South 333rd Street intersections would likely experience no measurable decrease in delay due to traffic calming measures, although the intersections are expected to operate at LOS B, which is already a desirable level of operation. Though intersection operations may not significantly be improved by installing traffic calming measures, the benefit of traffic calming may include lower traffic speeds and volumes on 20th Avenue South. With the Capacity Constrained Distribution about 41 PM peak hour project trips and 405 Sunday after - service trips are routed to the north on 20th Avenue South. At South 336th Street, these project trips with a final destination to the south split into two routes. Most of the trips turn left onto South 336th Street and turn left again on Pacific Highway South where they continue on the routes outlined in the Desire Path Distribution. Trips that are primarily bound to destinations to the southeast turn right on South 336th Street and continue south on Weyerhaeuser Way south, then rejoin the previous distribution. This distribution results in no additional mitigation needs at public street intersections for either the PM Peak hour or the Sunday after -service time periods. For the Sunday after -service peak, two of the three project driveways onto 20th Avenue South operate at LOS F due to the increased volume of left turns in the Sunday peak -exiting hour. The installation of "Through Movement Diverters" to restrict north -south movements on 20th Avenue South at 336th Street diverts both background and project trips primarily to SR 99. Analysis was performed using the "Capacity Constrained" distribution as a most conservative case for both the PM peak hour and Sunday after -service peak. The restriction on through movements diverts background trips during the PM peak hour totaling approximately 50 southbound through trips to SR 99. About 10 southbound background trips originating in the neighborhood to the north remain on 20th Avenue South but take a right turn at the South 336th Street intersection, then turn left (southbound) at SR 99. Northbound through trips totaling about 35 vph are routed to SR 99. During the Sunday after services peak hour, the restriction on through movements diverts background trips totaling approximately 55 southbound through trips to SR 99. About 10 southbound background trips originating in the neighborhood to the north remain on 20th Avenue South but take a right turn at the South 336th Street intersection, then turn left (southbound) at SR 99. Northbound through trips totaling about 25 vph are routed to SR 99. Project trips previously routed northbound on 20th Avenue South are diverted primarily to SR 99 by making a left turn onto South 336th Street and a right turn at the South 336th/SR 99 intersection. The Level of Service analysis in Table 3.1-1 indicates the impacts that occur from the diversion of trips to other routes are similar to the Constrained Capacity analysis with two access driveways operating at LOS F. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-60 November 2003 18th Avenue Neighborhood If this roadway were opened to connect South 341st Street and South 344th Street, the character of traffic on the street would change from the current trips to serve the existing residences that likely don't exceed 16 in the PM peak hour to approximately 310 weekday PM peak hour trips, including about 90 project trips, and approximately 460 trips on Sunday, during the peak exiting time of the church, with about 420 of those generated by the church. This would lead to a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood in terms of traffic related noise and accident exposure. Traffic related noise would change from those related to a car every three or four minutes to about ten cars a minute. This is not likely to result in a measurable change in terms of decibel levels from the typical range of 55 to 60 dBA in a residential area, but the frequency of noise impacts will increase. This would be a substantial change from the existing conditions on a quiet residential cul-de sac. If heavy trucks accessing industrial uses in the vicinity utilized the street, peak noise levels from those vehicles would be somewhat greater. Accident exposure would be much greater due to additional traffic on the street. This is unlikely to directly result in accidents. Instead it is likely to completely change the way the street is used by residents, especially those with children. With additional traffic, residents are less likely to walk along the street, they are likely to cross the street less frequently to interact with neighbors. Children are likely to be restricted from playing in the street. Residents with children will be more likely to fence their yards for safety reasons. A variety of measures can be implemented to slow traffic and increase safety, as outlined in the traffic calming measures above. Potential features that could be considered include: • Installation of sidewalks to provide a safe pedestrian walkway outside the street surface used by vehicles. This could be installed outside the existing ditch section on the street, or combined with installation of curb, and gutters. • Chicanes, could be used to provide a curved roadways to reduce speeds and provide more of a neighborhood feel. • Chokers, mid -block curb extensions that narrow a street by extending the sidewalk or widening the planting strip, could be employed as another means of reducing speeds. These can also serve as safe pedestrian crosswalks if so marked. They could be combined with other measures, such as speed tables, textured crosswalks, and raised median islands. • Chicanes and chokers could be designed, together with signage, to limit the use of the street by heavy trucks if that was desired. In that case, heavy trucks would continue to use the east -west streets in the area. With these mitigating measures, the street would still undergo a major transformation. The likely long- term effect of opening the street would be to encourage a transition to non-residential uses. Current and future residents are less likely to desire to live on a street in an industrial area that carries substantial volumes of through traffic. In an area with small lots, this could involve an extended transition period of aggregating parcels into sufficient size for economical redevelopment. The question of whether to open the existing right-of-way to through traffic is ultimately a decision to that balances the desire to retain the environment relied upon by existing residents with the public policy inherent in the change from residential to industrial zoning that envisions a transition in land use as well as the public benefits of an interconnected circulation system. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-61 November 2003 3.1.4.6 Pedestrian and Transit Mitigation The proposed project would provide sidewalks on the south side of South 336th Street between I-5 and the westerly project boundary. For a time period between completion of site frontage improvements and completion of the City of Federal Way project, there would be a gap in the sidewalk between the westerly boundary of the site and Pacific Highway South. In this location, the existing wide shoulder would accommodate pedestrian movement. A potential mitigating measure for this gap in the continuous sidewalk that would improve pedestrian safety and comfort would be for the project to continue improvements to the west to integrate with sidewalk improvements planned on Pacific Highway South. The major pedestrian route north of the project is on 20th Avenue South where pedestrians are accommodated primary on the shoulder which varies in width, and is narrow in some cases and provides a low comfort environment for pedestrians and potential vehicle/pedestrian safety hazards. Several mitigation measures could address this potential problem ranging from information programs to encourage employees and church and school attendees to avoid this corridor and use Pacific Highway South instead, to providing local bus pickup service or encouraging carpools for attendees living in this area without personal vehicles, to programming sidewalk improvements as a cooperative effort between the city, the local community and the Christian Faith Center. Access to transit on the south side of 336th is likely to be improved by frontage improvements incorporated in the project. Use of transit service can be encouraged by providing safe and comfortable transit stops, especially in areas like this where transit service is not frequent. Potential mitigation could include enhancing safety on the north side of 336th Street by providing widened shoulders at the pedestrian walking and waiting area to the transit stop near 20th Avenue. Transit shelters can improve comfort of transit riders waiting for busses and are one of many factors that might encourage greater transit use. 3.1.4.7 Safety Mitigation A potential safety concern has been identified at the church driveways accessing 20th Avenue South for Sunday peak exiting rates. The northerly church driveway is proposed to provide one in and two out lanes. The other driveways are proposed to provide one in and one out lane. The peak demand for existing trips onto 20th Avenue South is likely to result in delays and queuing into the project driveways. This does not present an operational problem for the City street, but it may lead to driver frustration by church attendees waiting to exit the site. Such frustration can lead to potentially unsafe practices such making left turns without adequate traffic gaps on 20th Avenue South. An option to improve safety would be to provide traffic direction by appropriately trained persons during peak Sunday demand periods. This would improve safety by providing direction of traffic on 20th Avenue and the driveways. It could also potentially allow greater efficiency for traffic entering and exiting the site and could be coordinated with traffic direction at the 20th Avenue South/South 336th Street intersection to discourage traffic northbound on 20th Avenue South through the residential area. 3.1.4.8 Mitigation of Impacts of Off -Site Improvements Two intersections have been assessed for the potential impacts of additional improvements that may be required to implement the connection between South 341st and 344th Streets. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-62 November 2003 South 344th Street/16th Avenue South This intersection would require an east and west -bound left turn lane to accommodate traffic with the connection of South 341st and 344th Streets. This improvement is in the City of Federal Way Capital Improvement Plan for implementation by 2007. • At the southeast quadrant at the intersection there is an undeveloped parcel. • At the southwest quadrant, the existing building is set back from the property line on South 344th Street about 140 feet. There is no curb, gutter or sidewalk on South 344th Street at this location. + The existing building in the northeast quadrant is set back about 70 feet. Curb, planting strip and sidewalk is provided at this location. • In the northwest quadrant the existing building is at the property line. There is a ditch section without curb, gutter and sidewalk on the South 344th Street frontage at this location. Anticipated improvements are anticipated to include an additional turn lane, through lanes and bike lanes with a total width of 46 feet, in addition, standard curbs and gutters, six foot planting strips and eight foot sidewalks would add 14 feet to improvements on each side. With an additional three-foot wide utility strip behind the sidewalk, the right of way would be 78 feet wide. The improvements are presumed to maintain the existing right-of-way line on the north side because of the building at the edge of the property in the northwest quadrant. Given those assumptions, the following impacts would occur on adjacent uses. • In the southeast quadrant, an additional 18 feet of right-of-way would affect future development potential, but would not displace existing facilities. In the southwest quadrant, a similar acquisition would displace existing landscaping and 10 parking spaces. The displacement of 10 of 37 existing spaces would reduce parking supply by almost one third. The remaining 27 spaces would be sufficient to meet zoning code requirements for low intensity commercial uses on the site, but may limit the potential for different higher intensity uses in the future. • On the northeast and northwest quadrants of the site, standard curbs, gutters, planting strips and sidewalks could be developed within the existing right-of-way. South 344th Street/Pacific Highway South Similar to the intersection above, this intersection would require an east and west -bound left turn lane. This improvement is in the City of Federal Way Capital Improvement Plan for implementation by 2007. Pacific Highway South is at about a 30 degree angle to the cross streets, which complicates the alignment of the intersections somewhat. At the southeast quadrant of the intersection is an office building constructed almost to the property line. • At the southwest quadrant, the existing building is set back from the property line on South 344th Street about 60 feet. The intervening areas is devoted to parking, including parking on the right- of-way, where there is no curb, gutter or sidewalk. • The northeast quadrant has an existing building and mechanical equipment that come almost to the right-of-way line in the easterly portion of -the property. In the westerly portion of the property at this intersection, the building is stepped back about 20 feet from South 344 Street and about 40 feet from Pacific Highway South. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-63 November 2003 ■ In the northwest quadrant the existing building is at the property line on 344th Street and about 70 feet from Pacific Highway South. To accommodate local turns into parcels on the south side of 344th Street, the left turn lane is assumed to be needed over the entire block between 16th Avenue South and Pacific Highway South. The centerline of the street is likely to shift to the north in the westerly part of the corridor, as discussed below. As with the intersection above, anticipated improvements are anticipated to include require a right-of-way 78 feet wide. The angle at which Pacific Highway South intersects with 344th Street can be accommodated by an intersection that maintains the existing angle, or with an S-curve alignment to achieve a 90 degree intersection. An alignment preserving the existing angled intersection would likely maintain the existing right-of-way line at the southeast quadrant where the building is at or close to the property line and include widening on the north side. • In the southeast quadrant no acquisition would be required. The sidewalk would likely start near the property line and the curb would be located north of the existing edge of pavement. • In the southwest quadrant, acquisition of some right-of-way in the western part of the parcel likely would be required for a roadway transition to the south to avoid the building in the northwest quadrant, as discussed below. Some displacement of parking on the right of way and adjacent property is likely. The parking spaces lost could be replaced near the south west corner of the parcel, but parking would not be as convenient to the commercial frontage on the street. • In the northeast quadrant, acquisition of about 18 feet of right-of-way could be accomplished on the portion of the site where the building setback is sufficient. This would lead to a transition from the improvements on the south side of the right-of-way at the 16th Avenue intersection to the east. An area of parking or open storage area would be displaced. • In the northwest quadrant about 18 feet of right-of-way could be acquired across the parking lot that fronts 344th Street and Pacific Highway South. The roadway would likely transition to the south to avoid the existing building. Additional right-of-way could be acquired from parking lot area on the parcel in the southwest quadrant. The loss of parking would be relatively small compared to the on -site supply and would not be likely to affect the economic use of the existing building. If an S-curve alignment were constructed to bring the intersections into a 90 degree alignment, all or portions of one of the buildings in either the southeast or the northeast quadrants likely would be displaced. 3.1.5 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Unavoidable adverse impacts are related to cumulative impacts of transportation demand growth in the region. Increased regional growth creates demand for transportation services that may not be fully met by investments in roadway capacity and other transportation modes. The Christian Faith Center transportation demands contribute to the overall demand, but does not create unique unmitigatable local impacts. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-64 November 2003 3.1.6 Relationship to Plans and Policies Comprehensive Plan Policies Federal Way has a number of specific Comprehensive Plan Policies relating to transportation and development projects that are summarized below. TP15 Specify an appropriate arterial LOS which balances the economic, ecological, accessibility, and livability needs of City residents, consumers, employers, and employees. TP16 The City's LOS standard shall be E. This is defined herein as a volume/capacity ratio less than 1.00 in accordance with Highway Capacity Manual (1994/2000) operational analysis procedures. At signalized intersections, the analysis shall be conducted using a 120-second cycle length and level of service E is defined as less than 80 seconds of delay per vehicle. Where transit or HOV facilities are provided, the LOS shall be measured by average delay and volume/capacity ratio per person rather than per vehicle. This standard shall be used to identify concurrency needs and mitigation of development impacts. For long range transportation planning and concurrency analysis, a volume/capacity ratio of 0.90 or greater will be used to identify locations for the more detailed operational analysis. TP62 Modify the development review process by: ■ Incorporating revised impact analysis procedures that comply with State GMA concurrency and other requirements. The revisions need to include revised Level of Service standards. • Streamlining it to the extent possible to minimize private development costs. Where developments are consistent with this plan, they should be allowed to proceed by mitigating site impacts; developing appropriate components of the HOV, transit, non -motorized and motorized chapters; and participating in an equitable citywide improvement funding or mitigation payment program. ■ Incorporating requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. • Requiring explicit consideration of pedestrian and bicycle circulation, as well as parking and general circulation needs. TP63 Adopt a flexible level of service standard which employs a measurement factor that accommodates demand management to help balance likely levels of growth, with opportunities to create a multi -modal transportation system. Comprehensive Plan Implementation Strategies Provision of transportation facilities and services requires the timing of new projects to meet the needs of the community. At the same time, existing facilities must be maintained and the public's investment protected, maximizing the life of the infrastructure. The purpose of this section is to describe various strategies available to the City to implement the preferred transportation and land use plan. The preferred plan proposes a balanced investment among modes of travel, increasing the commitment to travel by transit, ridesharing, bicyclists, and pedestrians. This strategy may create somewhat higher levels of roadway congestion near transit centers, but will provide more travel options for those who choose to use other modes of travel. Growth management requires an implementation program which earmarks sufficient financial resources, while putting into place a Concurrency Management System to regulate the pace and scale of new growth within the community. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-65 November 2003 The implementation plan for Federal Way focuses on the next six -year time period within which to forecast needs and to identify reliable options for transportation funding. In reality, the City's implementation program began in 1990 at incorporation. During the past five years, several major transportation improvements have been completed or will soon be operational. While these improvements have occurred, the actual City growth rate has been lower than projected, thus creating fewer impacts on the transportation system. Since the City also has modest growth expectations over the next six years, the proposed transportation improvement programs for 1998-2004 and 2003-2008 are expected to maintain existing levels of service concurrency on the arterial system. At present, the City's transportation system is provided by a variety of agencies. The City operates, improves, and maintains most of the streets and roadways, although the State operates I-5 and SR 18, east of SR 161. Private development may construct various local street improvements, which then become the property of the public and must be maintained by the City. The City is also responsible for the management of the transportation system, which includes the setting of standards for design, maintenance and operations, and review and approval of modifications. Concurrency Testing State law requires that a concurrency "test" be applied to all development proposals as a condition of granting a development permit. A concurrency test compares a proposed development's need for public facilities and services to the "capacity" of the facilities and services that are available to meet demand. Other questions that need to be addressed are at what point in the development process does concurrency apply, what types of development permits are subject to the concurrency test, and should fees be charged for concurrency testing to cover staff and administrative costs associated with the testing. Federal Way's approach is to implement transportation improvements and programs that it can afford to finance. These improvements and programs are based upon the Comprehensive Plan FWCP, which includes a level -of - service standard for the transportation system. The primary purpose of the Concurrency Management Program is to allocate available resources based on the timing and location of development, and to assess mitigation fees based upon each new development's share of the improvements that are planned in the subarea within which it is located. Level -of -Service measures the outcome of and progress toward the planned growth rate. Concurrency Management and SEPA While concurrency requirements are similar in many ways to the requirements of the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA), there are some important differences, as follows: • Concurrency requirements are more demanding; if they are not met, denial of the project is mandated. • Concurrency is based on a Level -of Service (LOS) standard; SEPA has no specific standard as its basis. • Concurrency requirements only apply to capacity issues; SEPA requirements apply to all environmental impacts of a project, including transportation safety. • Concurrency has timing rights related to development; SEPA does not. Therefore, concurrency does not replace SEPA, but rather becomes an integral part of a comprehensive program that relates private and public commitments to improving the entire transportation system. SEPA will focus primarily on site impacts that could result in additional transportation requirements in specific instances (particularly access to the site or impacts in the immediate vicinity that could not have been anticipated in the overall transportation investment strategy for the system). Concurrency conclusions in this Comprehensive Plan the FWCP do not excuse projects from SEPA review. However, they do address Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-66 November 2003 major system infrastructure issues that must be properly administered under both SEPA and the Growth Management Act (GMA). Concurrency issues are addressed in the analysis portion of this section through addressing operational impacts of the vehicular circulation system and addressing impacts on pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes. The contribution of the project to the need for future transportation projects in the TIP is addressed, in part, by Table 3.1-9, below which indicates the proportion of project trips as related to future trips served by the facility and provides a rough measure of potential assessments for the projects. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-67 November 2003 Location Table 3.1-9. Project Impacts to TIP Projects Description Total PM Peak Hour Volume (VPH) Proportionate Share Project - Generated 2002 2007 2020 Trips (P) P/2007 P/02007 Pacific Highway S (S 312 St to S 324th St) Add HOV lanes, install raised median i2,650 3,150 3,620 3,180 12 1 0.4% 0.5% #` 2.3% 2.7% Pacific Highway S _ _� Add HOV lanes, left turn lanes on 324th 2,980 41130 _ 17 (S 324 St to S 340th St) 2nd NB left -turn lane at 336th, install raised median ^S 336th St at Weyerhaeuser Way Install roundabout 1,730 25.4a° 1,935 2,265 52 2.7% S 348th St (9th Ave S to Pacific Highway S) Add HOV lanes, 2nd NB left -turn lane on 2,810 Pacific Highway South, Install raised 2,730 3,130 38 1.4% -47.5% median, underground utilities 4,500 4,985 8 0.2% 3.1% S 320th St at 1st Ave S Add 2nd NB, WB left -turn lanes, widen 1st 4,240 Ave South to 5 lanes to 316th S 356th St (1st Ave S to Pacific Highway S) Widen to 5 lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, illumination Add HOV lanes, install raised median, underground utilities, illumination 1,600 I 1,950 21150 11 i 0.6% I 3.1 S 320th St (8th Ave S to Pacific Highway S) 0 5,820 0 0 0 I 0.0% 0.0% SR 18 at SR 161 Add EB, WB right -turn lanes, 3rd WB left- 5,920 6,330 44 0.7% 44.0% turn lane, add 3rd lane on SR 161 SB to 352nd S 336th St at 9th Ave S _ Signal modifications 7.6% 2,440 2,835 2,460 30 �� 1.1 % _ S 348th St at 1 st Ave S Add WB, SIB right -turn lanes, 2nd EB, WB 3,900 4,400 4,900 32 0.7% 6.4% left -turn lanes S 336th St at 1st Way S Add WB right -turn lane, signal 2,785 3,125 3,435 22 0.7% 6.5% modification, extend SIB left -turn lane ` 21 st Ave Swest Extend 2-lane collector, signal (Swest 356th St to 22nd Ave Swest) modifications 2,570 2,970 3,440 11 0.4% 2.8% S 320th St at 20th Ave S Add 2nd left -turn lanes EB, WB 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 2,010 2,270 2,500 10 0.4% 3.7% 1st Ave S Install raised median, improve access at (S 320th St to S 330th St) 328th S 336th St Widen to 3 lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, (18th Ave S to 1 5) street lights, SIB left -turn lane and signal at 1,360 1,480 1,710 47 I 3.2% 39.5% - - 20th Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-68 November 2003 Table 3.1-9. Project Impacts to TIP Projects (continued) Total PM Peak Hour Volume (VPH) Proportionate Share Project - Generated Location Description 2002 2007 2020 Trips (P) P/2007 P/L2007 Pacific Highway S Design study to construct new 2,870 3,190 3,360 8 0.3% 2.5% (SR 509 to S 312th St) interchange, extend 312th St from 28th Ave South to Military Rd South S 324th St at Pacific Highway S Widen to add EB, WB left -turn lanes 3,650 4,650 i 4,965 J 16 1 0.3% 1.6% S 344th St Add two-way left -turn lane, signals at 110 460 480. 22 4.8% 6.3% (Pacific Highway S to 16th Ave S) Pacific Highway South and 16th Ave South S 320th St at 1-5 Add 2nd left -turn lane, 3rd right -turn lane 5,205 6,195 6,720 40 0.6% 4.0% on SB off -ramp S 356th St Widen to 5 lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, 910 1,260 1,300 0 0.0% 0.0% (Pacific Highway S to SR 161) illumination L = Measured over Year 2002 Total Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-69 November 2003 Fed Way = DENS Master 11-12-03 3.2 WATERWAYS, HYDROLOGY, AND WATER QUALITY 3.2.1 Studies and Coordination This section of the EIS includes a discussion of existing streams and other waterways, hydrology, floodplains, and water quality. These analyses provide a basis for assessment of impacts on wildlife, aquatic resources, and endangered species and provide a qualitative evaluation of proposed options for enhancing the east and west branches of Hylebos Creek on and adjacent to the project site. This section has been prepared based on review of existing data, a peer evaluation of the technical studies provided by the applicant, and qualitative evaluation of likely impacts. Impacts from both alternatives involve stormwater impacts of new impervious surface to conveyance systems and waterways, and water quality impacts of runoff and potential sedimentation impacts from construction. Proposed mitigation has been evaluated for potential impacts identified and measures to enhance Hylebos Creek. 3.2.2 Affected Environment 3.2.2.1 Surface Water Bodies Characteristics The proposed site lies within the Hylebos Creek Basin (Figures 3.2-1 and 3.2-2). This basin is generally flat, flowing from headwater areas in Federal Way and North Lake towards the south. The separate branches of Hylebos Creek within the basin join and become the Hylebos Waterway, which discharges to Commencement Bay in Puget Sound. This basin comprises mostly commercial areas, along with single - and multi -family residences. The proposed site spans both the east and west branches of the Hylebos Creek Basin, where land uses are predominately single-family residences, with a small area of commercial development on the west side of the site. Some areas downstream of the proposed site are used for agricultural purposes (King County 1991). The site is predominately forested and contains two large wetlands and associated streams (Figure 3.2-3). Forests and wetlands intercept and absorb surface water runoff, delaying and decreasing peak runoff volumes in streams. In addition, wetlands serve to filter out sediment and other pollutants found in stormwater runoff. These characteristics can prevent flooding of surrounding areas, erosion of stream banks, and damage to aquatic habitats. Locations and Classification The on -site streams are known as Hylebos Creek Tributaries 0014C and 0016A. Tributary 0014C lies within the West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin`' and flows across the northwest corner of the site towards the south-southwest through a large wetland and stormwater detention facility known as the Kitts Corner Wetland (Wetland A on site plans). Tributary 0016A, part of the East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin, enters the site near the northeast corner and leaves the site near the southeast corner. A smaller wetland (Wetland B) borders the Hylebos East Tributary along this entire reach. A north -south ridge divides the site into two major drainage subcatchments as indicated in Figure 3.2-3. About 20 acres in the west portion of the site are within the West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin. The east subcatchment, which is about 27 acres, is part of the East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin. A third area of about '/3 acre, consisting of the proposed driveway access to Pacific Highway South, also drains into the West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin. Runoff from each subcatchment travels as sheet and subsurface flow towards the stream draining each area (AHBL 2002). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-70 November 2003 4 J •■•• Basin Boundary w•♦ Sub -Basin Boundary .� Sub -Catchment Boundary VH3 Sub -Catchment Number oohs Streams and Stream Number inventoried Wetland (King County, 1983) Streams .+...® Class II ------ Class III ..... Unclassified " No Class I in Sub -Basin l� ■a■• .,� i a'■ ■ ■. Rid. 26 '� ■. WH 1'4 ■•: NO, HEAS • ra _- RWHfO ■ W� 11� f �f �-fir' -- "� - - _ .�-1 '•�H 'i v • ORTHW T A A� 'WH'O - - ! L H1.5'' 3;�P •- - ��— 1T WHO; 14- C - •.;r� SO TH AREA WH . I1 WH4 3 ' n°' •J _ = j 22. r _ 4 -J -- 4 rT7T ' 1 _ -tom • �� • f' 35 i WH11 Location ■■a■!— f Relerence 19999�1 j Figure 3.2-1. West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-71 November 2003 Figure4.2.3 :•"...:©■e®961 EAST BRANCH HYLEBOS CREEK •T-••'�• • i41 SUB -BASIN RECOMMENDED SOLUTIONS •N• Basin Boundary + r _! Sub -Basin Boundary Sub -Catchment Boundary NH9 Sub -Catchment Number _ HS H' 2 00155 Streams and Stream Number s� _ �V Inventoried Wetland (King County, 1983) ; 02431 Project Location and Number ® Supplemental Onsite - Detention Standard H"t,^ • 1 Unit/5 Acre Zoning • HI i ■ • J. o2 - 1 t H Location Reference i i ti a 4s H4 �,�lal � •: i 'e , pro„ - - - �� . 2447 1991 "z 244 R _ a 'J�j49 Figure 3.2-2. East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-72 November 2003 _ '.t Parametrix DATE: 11/13/03 2:52pm FILE: K2441009P02T14F-3-2-3 SCALE IN FEET 0 150 300 Figure 3.2-3 Site Drainage Sub -Basins As documented in the Executive Proposed Basin Plan for Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound (King County 1991) (hereafter referred to as the Basin Plan), the Hylebos West Tributary within the site has not been classified under King County stream criteria, while the Hylebos East Tributary is a Class 3 stream (see Figures 3.2-1 and 3.2-2). King County classifies streams under three different categories. Class 1 streams are those that have been inventoried as Shorelines of the State under King County's Shoreline Master Program. Class 2 streams are smaller than Class 1 streams, and either flow year-round under periods of normal rainfall or are used by salmonids. Unlike Class 1 and 2 streams, Class 3 streams are intermittent or temporary during years of normal rainfall and are not used by salmonids. The 2002 City of Federal Way Stream Inventory classifies both on -site streams as major streams. Water Quality Classifications The water quality classifications of the tributaries located on -site, as well as those downstream receiving waters, determine the nature and severity of the potential impacts and the type of on -site water quality treatment measures necessary to mitigate the potential impacts. Hylebos Creek is listed as a Class A water under State Water Quality Standards (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] Chapter 173- 201A). The uses of Class A waters listed under WAC 173-201A include domestic, industrial, and agricultural water supply. Also, these waters provide migration, rearing, spawning, and harvesting habitat for salmonids, clams, oysters, mussels, crustaceans, and other shellfish (e.g., crabs, shrimp, crayfish, scallops), as well as wildlife habitat. In addition, these waters provide recreation, sport fishing, boating, aesthetic enjoyment, commerce, and navigation. Any water listed as Class A must meet certain water quality criteria for fecal coliform bacteria; dissolved oxygen; total dissolved gas; temperature; pH; turbidity; toxic, radioactive, or deleterious materials; and aesthetic values set forth in WAC 173-201A (MRSC 1997). According to the City of Federal Way Water Quality Applications Map (Federal Way 2001), the west half of the proposed site lies within a Resource Stream Protection Area, while the east subcatchment lies in a Basic Water Quality Treatment Area. Therefore, the proposed design for the West Subcatchment 1 and the East Subcatchment must conform to the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) Resource Stream Protection and Basic Water Quality menus, respectively (King County 1998). Due to its smaller size, the portion of the driveway access to Pacific Highway South known as West Subcatchment 2 must meet only the KCSWDM Basic Water Quality menu. No modifications to this requirement are presented in the City of Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM (Federal Way 1999). Both the Hylebos East and West Tributaries discharge to fish -bearing streams (King County 2002). As such, the updated Ecology Manual (Ecology 2001) requires Enhanced Treatment for water quality in both the east and west subcatchments. The KCSWDM is being revised to comply with this new level of protection. Clean Water Act Listing Status The sections of the tributaries to Hylebos Creek and the associated wetlands that lie adjacent to the site are not listed by Washington State as being impaired in the 1998 listing under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Sections of the tributaries to Hylebos Creek lying downstream of the site are listed for fecal coliform bacteria. Specifically, a section approximately 2.5 miles downstream of the site on the west branch and a section approximately 3.5 miles downstream of the site on the east branch are listed. Fecal coliform bacteria commonly come from livestock and failing septic tanks (Ecology 2002) and are significant for human health as an indicator of disease -carrying organisms. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-74 November 2003 Identified Management Strategies The Basin Plan documents the effects of urbanization on natural channels in the Hylebos Basin, including impacts of high flows. The Basin Plan cites the flume -like nature of many channel reaches, where channel erosion, neighboring hillside erosion, and downstream deposition of channel- and culvert - clogging sediment are much higher than under natural conditions. In describing the condition of Tributary 0016A on the east side of the site, the Sensitive Species Report (A1derNW 2002) indicates that a retaining wall abutting the stream, just downstream of the project site, has failed due to erosive forces. The Basin Plan identified flooding, erosion and sedimentation, and water quality issues within the Hylebos West Tributary in the vicinity of the proposed site, upstream and downstream of the Kitts Corner Wetland (Wetland A). Specifically, the Basin Plan identified incidents of flooding of houses and roads that posed a significant risk, and incidents of channel erosion posing a potential risk along the Hylebos West Tributary in the vicinity of the proposed site. The Basin Plan proposed construction of a system of regional conveyance and detention facilities to address the problems identified along the Hylebos West Tributary. Many of these projects have been completed by the City of Federal Way in 1997, and included detention upgrades to the Kitts Corner Wetland (Wetland A), conveyance upgrades to culverts along the Hylebos West Tributary, construction of the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility, and detention flow control structures and energy dissipaters. The Kitts Corner Wetland and South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility upgrades are shown on Figure 3.2-4 (CH2M Hill 1994a). While the Kitts Corner Wetland was constructed to address flooding and erosion on the West Branch, no such water facility exists on Tributary 0016A in the East Branch. 3.2.2.2 Flooding Based on review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map for the area, the proposed site is not located within a designated 500-year floodplain boundary (FEMA 1995). Also, as noted previously, historical flooding identified within the vicinity of the proposed site was addressed in 1997 by conveyance and detention system improvements and construction of the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility. 3.2.2.3 Historical Spill Data Based on review of the proposed site's Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Earth Consultants 1999), which included site observations, interviews with previous property owners, and review of historical records, no current or previous site uses have resulted in major spills or other adverse environmental impacts to the site. 3.2.2.4 Existing Drainage Conveyance As indicated above and shown on Figure 3.2-3, the site contains three separate drainage subcatchments. Two of the subcatchments, West Subcatchments 1 (19 acres) and 2 (0.35 acres), are within the West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin. The remaining subcatchment, the East Subcatchment, is part of the East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin. Other than the east and west branches of Hylebos Creek, there are no existing defined channels conveying runoff on the site; runoff from each subcatchment travels as sheet and subsurface flow towards its respective discharge location. Figure Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-75 November 2003 e `� � � f � - � _''. ice.• 1 >�i � ,,jj a`_ h ►� n r CQNTIN $ ref WETtAND e 7 e J' .EI:.El4i@N7 NO 1 owl Fk � •� � . AS,•TIvATp r%ISF W f ° ! C^'yf • � e 4k b•. • - si9RM pAA1N ti .. r �' n .: - �•a4� � ' �S- �• _ iRF7dDvE VIS.R13Ca +w0 •� � "'} y-` r,r• ~il..,. `' ee]] � ...1� . •. S 1YN I1 iOi-GRFILE FLATF S� � Q. d _ _�, . • E4 � • 1 . . 4.. ^�r r , � �• �,7 + ,a.ti .•B{HLtlNC I , F • ri r•r • . . : + � •.e: .. Imo` _ -r' +' •-,i•� = "'. E5 � � _i,/ ,,_ . �4S' rI _- i `;� r �� hSs YrE 1LA1g1 � :,, •1 �. '� �' . BHT ❑IA F r , !+ ¢ • � Rli?I , LWAFTAI+ 1: � -�7�• r''� ��., gg�� .'_�r [x]LYER7 f'. .. ; h ..' 1-yw _ -S ZiR `^ $ f iD - r aga, +tea . • E�x Is71n0 A wF7L ••rlrl' r�i1r _ ■ .! y ArxO ta' Du ENERGY I ♦ A • _ x NB. E' }• .' _ _ _ CULMI . DIssIPATOR _ _ -. S,a ..x E I _ � 7 �� ^ - L-8��.- - - _',�. d=--�17 �O T.Euaw - .. �� ''�'• AESTOREC,.,,,� �' - ~a dam__ f it `� !• !. .: f r- mow• 1-s:p`r r` �~- w r I '✓ ''' sTREAAI LIrJ"!. • N. •.. I ^r� ` w�Y�o . wS5 A dETENTi ` W� y jS°' _ : �� b . pWETLAND A `sa_ j . •.PODLM fL ZB3f ATINO I%` y Ti•�-i�4~-� e.COwTAt1L I M a W}- w� r •, _ y !�/"- •--{+` _ i' ;+' wti a. i!''�C lly• `'.h.� .+*. rsiopu pRiw �•+ T.+G • �Pr�•-'4.- { Fq S —rI �• JrI`.;. :sue +. �'$qt i� !• KITTS COAId-R X,STINC oETe_,4TION' I/r • .: r •vp 27 At; FT. 'r'L" �: t• '4Y 1 e.a• Rce Oaf~ Y Ii09LMi//MX FOP�RATIN6 Poi] 1. rm. •m�. — ,ELEII�BH7 NO 9 .i lid``«.4 .'.,Is,-=.��n�r� i -1 y y .� :y �r��+{6k3' y, Ir t �,1. +• • :nioEo- ' wtILB• • I: ► 1 67.OIx ryI RLow � Y` i 1 f Y FILTER pIRAIN FLOW CUCVZRT • �.f-�t TI - •,}M �� '.�_A "fti +'r'f r% CHRISTIAN FAITH r: "+ FaarorsslP.Tdrrl' /:_R 1• s_' f'e� •'.�,'t�' CENTER SITE SEDIA-ENTATION n N.. •,.; • • • 1E SPHEWEft _ ' dE S TS:V+� �..•' • ! f �'.�.. _ A t 'I�' •.r I - • _ !FESTOPtE0 Low? �W•. _ ` t r y +� �y FUTSIf+E A E][7eFe.As.]1j , .._ �j • �.,?';'+• • '-s7liSs�' C11.V.1�L!' _ � .+ 8ME1�iT INOi 2"'�.'� !� Pti r _ —.! f �''-—"'�.,%rlNal oAI101F AMV11I' .. • : r yam... TLANB YITIWTION • + 1 i.r� I� - - 1 r rr C�L`'[EHi w�. �y� � - � Et, Zi].i9 �e. �:r. _ • _ _ _ %•, f. •+ � '..fir " - , •S¢.'ai.C-Fix .• ._ ?C. L ► r ti '. • •_ . • /y - �•NOA�•yA�r�(`~' ^Y'L�r - � � _ . .::••- • -'.+ +r r�. ... J`r • l ' f f'' � 1 ^7 : oPgRATiHq PQOL 'r • I •• k�7 -{ •__ � • +•.'•.� i• . ,x r _ " 1 � / ,'Za1,si f, '} �} ^p�qT�_ `a+•r ' - ` �� :'K' tirA Gk��sL; �" _ _ '�: _ :! ►: -�• _�'.+� , r�_�� _ - _ �` ' r'' J . � •I .1 .-•rr'f La lr . • • . ' m�. I �.1�is' •1 •.••r' • •,?' 4 `� • 11 r '�`'e`, •' r �� ' nl �;T{,f:Fr !�! '�J``'=k- M1 �-.R�A ` .'' � 1.1`• �=•— � .� _ W� � ; ��. !/rC�•�/�f�t,. ,�� ;��r j�f -;/'•_.-� _ _ � • i ! I V� f ' I7 f I� + ., „ � r+ � EErr? ,+� '�� Pa�a�Ee i�rmi�A�i `.� v � r f • ! � � ., Jr'' .. �' �r f . rk. r STRVCTyRE I+ r�r,�FLa>;.�x .r I C:y! I, Jam,/ ui e. ~`� 1 % 1 R`�I .� •+Ir .)l % // 60" DIA . j .P�, PR FtTr FILL RT t� Fi7tA OR STORM -�•'y !•' ' + ■ Wr1r1�T pyiF7 pF yr ,~ _ ;{.r y J'••, ` I -- -••-EXISTING STREAM Ett97 WETLnNDI' {I r Yrl+YY r f. '• n R'GH'r,. "4 1�`.� rY I pyi !i i' ~•; '� '�. i, F• ~ •, . _rl' , f EXISTING SANITARY 1E1=R S'FNEAIA BLR:CA i ! ^- _,+./ �`.^ f '1, - ~ •1:-! LIMITS - ' ! �.• - '�• jr.� .r wIr!+ENT BF3W-�+;•• Y }��11.. - „',�,. I - ��'%: �'�r ��' ':- i ��• ! EXISTING STORM DRAINS ' r 1 ''�-�'�AyG4 •C �+-� O•. ' J r� ` rl 1 JJ' l _e �.i' EXISTING WETLAND j . OYFRFLOw r :5 * �F :t J+• r J p`e. [ 9PILCwAY '�' f • rr_, ,I' ! - „j !' �•.Y r S• r'' DETENTIOIJ STORAGE ` .� 2� CULVERTS �'• "� 71 •r` I. 'i<:', J S _„_„_,,. MAXIMUM INUNDATION AREA �•(', '�' ; i' tili •. +--��PflOPOSED STORM DRAIN ALIpf1DYERaENT'S f- j•,� 'DIifIPATpiT 1 .; +�^. •4 ..1.. _ A. ii•.�. -....: ELEMENT BOUNDARY ExlSiiNQ�STRElui.'� ~ fr��` SCALE 1N FEET Parametrix Christian Faith Center 554-2442-009/02(14) 10/03 (K) Figure 3.2-4 West Branch Hylebos Creek Regional Detention Facilities Existing Stormwater Discharge West Subcatchment 1 discharges to the Kitts Corner Wetland detention facility (Wetland A), which then discharges to an underground pipe. This pipe conveys the flow for about'/a mile and then drains to the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility (see Figure 3-4). West Subcatchment 2 discharges to the Pacific Highway South piped conveyance system, which also conveys flows to the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility. The majority of the East Subcatchment discharges into the Hylebos East Tributary, while a small portion on the south end of the site discharges to a conveyance system associated with South 341st Street. The Technical Information Report (AHBL 2002) contains a detailed off -site drainage analysis. The analysis documented observations of no existing conveyance problems downstream of the two west subcatchments or the conveyance system associated with South 341st Street. Along the Hylebos East Tributary, a small amount of incision was observed along an 8-foot stretch of the stream immediately downstream of the site. In addition, ponding and backwatering was observed at a 48-inch culvert under South 344th Street (1,440 feet downstream of the site), though no flooding of the associated roadway was expected. Historical flooding/conveyance system limitations identified on the Hylebos West Branch within the vicinity of the proposed site were addressed in 1997 by conveyance system improvements and construction of the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility. Impervious Surface Areas The East Subcatchment within the proposed site includes approximately 27 acres. Of this, just less than 6 acres contain a stream, wetlands, and buffer areas, approximately 20 acres are forested, 1.7 acres are pasture, and 0.4 acre is currently impervious. The 20 acres that lie within West Subcatchment 1 includes over 2 acres that contain a wetland, stream, and buffer areas. Approximately 0.6 acre of impervious surface associated with South 336th Street lie within this subcatchment, while the remaining 17 acres are forested. West Subcatchment 2 is approximately 0.35 acre in size, with approximately 0.15 acre of impervious surface and 0.20 acre of landscaping. 3.2.2.5 Groundwater Resources The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Earth Consultants 1999) describes the groundwater based on topography in the general vicinity of the site and local surface drainage features. Regionally, overall groundwater flow is directed towards the southwest. Locally, groundwater is expected to move away from the topographic high in the central portion of the site, with gradients towards the east and west, respectively. The site's Geotechnical Engineering Study (Earth Consultants 2002) documented levels of light to heavy groundwater seepage from 2 to 6%2 feet below existing grade. Soil test excavations typically encountered increased soil moisture and mottled soil to depths of approximately 6 feet below grade. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-77 November 2003 The observed seepage and increased soil moisture typically indicate a seasonal perched groundwater layer on top of a layer of dense to very dense glacial till. Perched groundwater can affect excavations of stormwater detention facilities and other site developments. Groundwater fluctuations can be expected depending on seasonal variation, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other hydraulic factors. The Geotechnical Engineering Study did not include discussion of any local or regional groundwater aquifers or any existing groundwater wells on the proposed site. Groundwater Use According to the City of Federal Way Critical Areas Map, the site lies just outside of the aquifer recharge zone, and on -site groundwater is not likely to provide significant contribution to this area. However, the groundwater on -site is likely to provide a supplemental water source to the vegetation in the wetlands on the east and west sides of the site. Changes in subsurface flow of this groundwater source may affect the existing wetlands. 3.2.2.6 Soil Setting Soils Class The Geotechnical Engineering Study for the proposed site (Earth Consultants 2002) lists the underlying soils as predominately glacial till. Soil observations were made using 32 test pits excavated at various locations throughout the site. These observations showed the soil to consist of a layer of topsoil approximately 12 inches thick overlying 1 to 4 feet of dense silty sand (Unified Soil Classification SM) with localized interbeds of sandy silt (ML). This layer overlies medium dense to very dense, weathered to unweathered glacial till. The majority of the glacial till sediments are made of silty sand with varying amounts of gravel and cobbles (SM) to the maximum exploration depth of 14 feet below grade. Some localized areas of till contain sandy silt with gravel (ML) and silty gravel with sand (GM). Soil Characteristics Glacial till consists of unsorted deposits of clay, silt, sand, and gravel that have been deposited by an advancing glacier. Till is formed when the glacier subsequently overrides these deposits and compacts them into a very dense soil. Till soils have low infiltration rates, which increases the time required for surface water absorbed by till to travel to streams as groundwater. In addition, till is generally suitable for support of structural loads and is often resilient to erosion. However, till usually contains very fine, silty soil particles, which once eroded, tend to remain suspended in surface waters for long periods of time. These suspended particles in streams can block sunlight and clog spawning gravel, resulting in damage to water quality and habitat. 3.2.3 Environmental Impacts 3.2.3.1 Impacts of the Proposed Alternative Site Hydrology Land Use Existing conditions on the proposed site are 90 percent forested and 3 percent wetland, with the remaining 7 percent a mixture of impervious surfaces, pasture, and grass (Figure 3.2-5). The proposed alternative would convert this area into about 50 percent impervious surfaces and 50 percent pervious surfaces, including 18 percent wetlands, streams, and buffers, 22 percent landscaping and drainage facilities, and about 10 percent grassed playfield. This would result in increased surface runoff and reduced stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-78 November 2003 ation Parametrix DATE: 11/13/03 2:54pm FILE: K2441009P02T14F-3-2-5 SCALE IN FEET Figure 3.2-55 Proposed Site Drainage 0 150 300 Facilities Stormwater Discharge Existing on -site drainage paths would be affected by proposed stormwater discharge locations. The proposed alternative would detain runoff from the East Subcatchment in two ponds, known as the School Pond and the South Pond, both located near the southeast corner of the site. The majority of the areas proposed to be detained by these two ponds currently discharge as unconcentrated surface, subsurface, and groundwater flow to the Hylebos East Tributary and the associated wetland spanning the entire east edge of the site. The proposed alternative would concentrate most of this flow and discharge it at the southeast corner of the site or into the piped conveyance system in South 341st Place. To a lesser extent, a somewhat similar impact would occur in the West Subcatchment 1. Under the proposed alternative, runoff from the sanctuary roof (about 25 percent of impervious surface in the Subcatchment) would be collected and discharged to the existing Kitts Corner Wetland detention facility (Wetland A) through a level spreader. However, runoff from pollution -generating impervious surfaces, such as the parking lots and roadways, would be conveyed through a constructed water quality treatment wetland and discharged to the south end of the Kitts Corner Wetland. Under existing conditions, stormwater from this area discharges as unconcentrated surface, subsurface, and groundwater flow along the entire eastern boundary of the Kitts Corner Wetland. West Subcatchment 2 currently discharges to the Pacific Highway South conveyance system. The proposed alternative should not affect this discharge location. Flooding As noted, the proposed site is not located within a designated 500-year floodplain boundary (FEMA 1995). In addition, historical flooding identified within the vicinity of the proposed site was addressed in 1997 by conveyance system improvements on the west branch of Hylebos Creek and construction of the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility (CH2M Hill 1994a). The design of the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility assumed land use conditions equivalent to full build -out to future zoned conditions, thus anticipating future conveyance needs. The amount of runoff from the proposed alternative is within the design parameters of expected future runoff that the detention facilities are designed to accommodate and should not contribute to future flooding concerns. Level 1 detention is proposed for the East Subcatchment through the School Pond and the South Pond. It was assumed that the conveyance capacity of related streams (as documented in existing technical reports) would not be exceeded with appropriate stormwater detention facilities incorporated in project plans. Impacts to Water Quality Typical Runoff Pollutants The proposed alternative includes a constructed water quality treatment wetland to treat runoff from pollution -generating impervious surfaces (i.e., parking lots and roadways) in the West Subcatchment 1. The proposed treatment for runoff from the West Subcatchment 2 (the driveway to the west) would use an underground wetvault, while runoff from the entire East Subcatchment would be detained and treated through a combined detention pond/wetpool facility. The proposed water quality treatment facility in the West Subcatchment 1 would be designed to meet the KCSWDM requirements for Resource Stream Protection Water Quality Treatment, while the facilities planned for the West Subcatchment 2 and East Subcatchment meet Basic Treatment requirements. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-80 November 2003 The Basic Treatment Water Quality menu from the KCSWDM sets a performance goal of 80 percent removal of total suspended solids (particulates) from stormwater. The solids removed through Basic Treatment are usually the larger, coarser fraction of those particles present. A higher level of treatment is provided by the KCSWDM Resource Stream Protection Water Quality menu, which sets a performance goal of 50 percent removal of total zinc. While it is not the most toxic metal found in stormwater, zinc is used as an indicator of metals removal because it is usually present in a more significant amount than other metals. Once entrained in the runoff, many metals are readily adsorbed onto particulates, especially the smaller, finer fraction of the particles. Therefore, Resource Stream Protection treatment facilities remove more of the particulate load than the Basic Treatment facilities, including the smaller, finer fraction that contains attached metals. Metals can be added to stormwater runoff from a variety of sources, but most commonly come from areas of vehicular use. Copper, lead, and zinc are metals often found in stormwater flowing from such areas. Temperature The proposed alternative would convert most of the site from forest to impervious and grassed areas. Under existing conditions, a substantial portion of rainfall on the site infiltrates, remains cooled and insulated as groundwater flow, and is discharged to wetlands and surface conveyances gradually. The proposal would replace this natural condition with surface water conveyance, which would reduce baseflows and result in conditions more susceptible to temperature fluctuation. Removal of tree cover would reduce shade and heat ground surfaces, especially paved surfaces and roofs, in turn raising the temperature of contacting runoff. In addition, stormwater from the east subcatchment would be detained in two separate stormwater ponds, while stormwater from the west subcatchments would be held in the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility. Long detention periods in ponds such as those proposed also increase temperatures through sun exposure. These factors could result in increased temperatures of stormwater discharged from the site during summer months with potential impacts on aquatic resources, as discussed in Section 3.4 (Wildlife, Fish, and Endangered Species). Maintenance Activity Impacts Operation and maintenance for the proposed alternative will be required to conform to City of Federal Way and King County standards (AHBL 2002). The KCSWDM requires routine removal of sediment from detention facilities, water quality treatment facilities, and conveyance structures. If performed during wet periods, sediment removal from these structures could result in increased turbidity in stormwater discharges. When performed during dry periods with no stormwater discharge, such maintenance should not affect water quality. Also, the proposed alternative includes a large sports field to be located at the northeast corner of the site near the proposed school building. Some runoff from this sports field would be captured and conveyed to the proposed detention/water quality treatment facility, while some runoff would sheet -flow into the Hylebos East Tributary wetland buffer. If pesticides are used to maintain the vegetation on the sports field, they could potentially affect the biological activity in the Hylebos East Tributary and its associated wetland if not fully removed by the proposed wetpond water quality treatment or otherwise mitigated. Erosion and Sedimentation Impacts Level Spreaders The proposed alternative employs the use of level spreaders at several discharge locations on the site, including the School Pond detention facility and the roof drains of the sanctuary building. As noted in the Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-81 November 2003 KCSWDM, the use of level spreaders is discouraged due to frequent design failures. Specifically, despite best efforts, it is often difficult to field -place a spreader that is exactly level, and concentrated discharge is often generated at the spreader's low point. Such concentrated flow usually results in severe erosion downslope of the discharge. This not only results in damage to areas adjacent to level spreaders, but it can lead to sediment deposition and damage to aquatic habitat farther downstream (King County 1998). Flow Control As noted earlier, it was assumed that the conveyance capacity of related streams (as documented in existing technical reports) would not be exceeded with appropriate stormwater detention facilities incorporated in project plans. The proposed stormwater detention facilities for the East Subcatchment (the School Pond and the South Pond) have been designed to meet Level 1 flow control under current KCSWDM requirements. The goal of Level 1 flow control is to prevent flows from becoming so great that they overtop the stream banks and flood surrounding areas. This level of design focuses on detaining runoff from extremely high intensity rain events that occur over a 24-hour period. However, erosion and sedimentation impacts can occur in a stream well before its banks are flooded. Moderate rains that last for several days produce flows that may never flood a stream, but will erode the soils and vegetation from its banks or mobilize sediment in the streambed due to constant impact over time. Such flows are the most common cause of erosion and sedimentation in streams and a greater level of flow control (i.e., a larger pond) is required to protect against them. Level 2 flow control targets these flows of longer duration. The KCSWDM is being revised and may require this level of protection for all new developments. While local flow control facilities for new developments are usually sized to meet either Level 1 or Level 2 flow control requirements, regional flow control facilities can be designed to meet various detention requirements. Under a pre-existing agreement between the prior landowner and the City of Federal Way, stormwater from the western subcatchments would discharge to the Kitts Corner Wetland without detention. As a result of the agreement, no hydraulic analysis has been conducted by the applicant on the volumes of stormwater likely to be discharged, or the effect of such stormwater contribution on the efficiency and functioning of the Kitts Corner Wetland and downstream water quality facilities. It should be noted that the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility on Hylebos Creek West Branch was designed with future growth in the subcatchment taken into consideration. It was designed, however, to detain high -intensity, short -duration runoff flows based on historical flooding identified within the basin (CH2M Hill 1994a), but it was not intended to meet the exact requirements of either Level 1 or Level 2 flow control. Federal Way plans a capital improvement project to include in -stream bank and bed stabilizers to control/moderate the high rate of erosion as well as stabilize episodic depositions from landslides from ravine walls. Plans include extensive plantings within the stream corridor to enhance the riparian habitat. The project is slated for construction in the summer of 2004. (CIP 241, the West Hylebos Creek Restoration Project, and extends from the blueberry farm north of SW 356th downstream to the crossing of Pacific Highway South). Erosion and sedimentation may occurr in the Hylebos East Tributary. As the result of the Level 1 flow control facilities included in the design for the easterly portion of the site. This may be mitigated by additional flow control measures as discussed below under Mitigating Measures. Impacts on Groundwater Resources As noted, the proposed alternative would convert a predominately forested area to approximately 50 percent impervious surfaces. This land use conversion would result in increased surface runoff and reduced stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. This, in turn, would reduce baseflows and provide conditions more susceptible to temperature fluctuation. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-82 November 2003 Potential Impacts on Wetlands The proposed alternative would concentrate most of the flow from the East Subcatchment and discharge it at the southeast corner of the site. Currently, stormwater in the East Subcatchment discharges as unconcentrated surface, subsurface, and groundwater flow to the Hylebos East Tributary and the associated wetland spanning the entire east edge of the site from north to south. The proposed discharge location would bypass this entire area and release flows near the downstream end of the wetland. The Hylebos East Tributary, which runs through this wetland, is intermittent in nature and is not expected to provide a consistent supply of water to the surrounding vegetation. Therefore, wetland vegetation upstream of the proposed East Subcatchment discharge locations may be adversely affected due to reduced water supply. Similarly, runoff from pollution -generating impervious surfaces in the West Subcatchment 1 (i.e., parking lots and roadways) would be concentrated through a constructed water quality treatment wetland and discharged to the south (downstream) end of the Kitts Corner Wetland. Under existing conditions, stormwater from this area discharges as unconcentrated surface, subsurface, and groundwater flow along the entire eastern boundary of the Kitts Corner Wetland. Vegetation upstream of the proposed West Subcatchment 1 water quality treatment discharge location may be adversely affected due to reduced water supply. Also, the proposed alternative employs the use of level spreaders to discharge stormwater to on -site wetlands. As noted in the KCSWDM, the use of level spreaders is discouraged due to frequent design failures. Specifically, despite best efforts, it is often difficult to field -place a spreader that is exactly level, and concentrated discharge is often generated at the spreader's low point. The proposed use of level spreaders to discharge stormwater may result in erosion to the vegetated buffers and sediment deposition within the on -site wetlands (King County 1998). Construction Water Quality Impacts Erosion and Sedimentation The proposed alternative would require clearing approximately 40 acres, which is currently predominately covered with a dense forest and duff soil layer. Clearing this area would remove vegetation that prevents high runoff velocities and expose the erodible topsoil layer. In addition, according to the Geotechnical Engineering Study (Earth Consultants 2002), in order to reach planned construction subgrade elevations, the proposed alternative would require cuts ranging from 1 to 14 feet below and fill ranging from 2 to 4 feet above existing grade. Soils stockpiled during this cut and fill activity could pose an additional sediment transport risk. Soils stockpiled for landscaping purposes also could pose this risk. The Technical Information Report (AHBL 2002) states that the temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) measures would be taken from the City of Federal Way Addendum to the KCSWDM (Federal Way 1999), which references Appendix D of the KCSWDM. Specific TESC measures proposed include: • Delineation of clearing limits. • Use of cover measures on disturbed areas. • Temporary stabilization of construction entrances. • Perimeter protection of ditch and site runoff at the downstream site perimeter. • Sediment ponds to retain and treat runoff from the site. • Storm drain inlet protection with filter fabric. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-83 November 2003 • Interceptor ditches to direct runoff from disturbed areas to the sediment ponds. • Dust control measures. Under the KCSWDM requirements, all sediment ponds proposed for the construction period would be sized to treat the 2- and 10-year storm runoff from the site. It should be noted that sediment ponds are usually not an effective means of removing fine suspended particles from runoff and therefore may not control the turbidity in the site discharge. Also, there is a 5 percent chance that a rain event of greater magnitude than the 10-year storm will occur during a 6-month construction period. Such a rain event would overflow the ponds and possibly bypass other TESC measures. Project Staging Areas In addition to erodible materials exposed during construction activities, construction staging areas may contain hazardous materials that could pose a threat to stormwater quality. Such materials include petroleum products used for equipment maintenance, as well as paints and other chemicals associated with construction. In addition, concrete and associated byproducts could raise the pH in receiving waters and damage aquatic habitat. These and other materials pose a threat to water quality if not handled properly. 3.2.3.2 Impacts of the No-Action/Business Park Alternative It is assumed that the business park alternative would cover the same developed portion of the site, except that the area devoted to the sports field would be used for buildings, parking, and required landscaping. In addition, the business park alternative would dedicate a larger portion of the final development to building area as opposed to parking. The impacts of the business park alternative would be similar to those discussed for the proposed alternative, with the few exceptions discussed below. Site Hydrology Land Use As noted, the area devoted to the sports field in the proposed alternative would be used for buildings, parking, and required landscaping in the business park alternative. This proposed land use would result in a higher percentage of impervious area, and therefore, a slightly higher increase in the amount of surface runoff and a greater reduction in the amount of stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. It is assumed that additional detention area would be required to control runoff from the larger impervious area. Stormwater Discharge The planned discharge locations for the proposed alternative could affect the existing site hydrology by discharging current subsurface flows as surface water farther downstream. Impacts to Water Quality Impacts of the business park alternative would be somewhat different from those of the proposed alternative due to the different land uses. Specifically, the business park alternative would contain more impervious surfaces than the proposed alternative, but it is assumed that the amount of pollution - generating impervious surfaces (e.g., parking) would be less. In contrast, these smaller amounts of pollution -generating impervious surfaces in the business park alternative may experience higher use through higher turnover of commercial parking during the week compared to limited use of weekend church parking expected for the proposed alternative. Therefore, the pollutant load/surface area could be Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-84 November 2003 higher for the business park alternative. However, determining the total difference in pollutant load between the two alternatives is not possible without a detailed analysis. Maintenance Activity Impacts As noted, it is possible that pesticides would be used to maintain the vegetation cover of the planned sports field for the proposed alternative. The business park alternative would not include a large grassed area; therefore, the possibility of pesticide use is reduced. Impacts on Groundwater Resources As it is assumed that the business park alternative would cover the same developed portion of the site, except that the area devoted to the sports field would be used for buildings, parking, and required landscaping. The business park alternative would therefore result in a higher percentage of impervious area than the proposed alternative. Therefore, the business park alternative would produce a slightly higher increase in surface runoff and a greater reduction of stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. 3.2.4 Mitigating Measures Impact mitigation includes the following ordered steps: L Avoid the impact altogether. 2. Minimize the impact. 3. Reduce the impact over time. 4. Rectify the impact. 5. Compensate for the minimized unavoidable impact. 3.2.4.1 Operational Impact Mitigation Site Hydrology Site Design The large amount of added impervious surface would increase surface runoff and reduce stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. Decreasing the amount and/or the effect of new impervious surface through the following methods can reduce this impact: • Limit the amount of surface parking to the minimum required by code. Use green roofs on the proposed sanctuary and/or school buildings. Depending on rain intensity and green -roof soil depths, 15 to 90 percent of runoff can be absorbed and slowly released. Plants intercept and delay rainfall runoff and the peak flow rate. Plants also eventually return water to the surrounding atmosphere by evaporation and transpiration. Average runoff absorption rates for green roofs are between 50 to 60 percent (Ferguson 1998). Utilization of a green roof would involve additional building cost due to the additional structural loads of soil supported on the roof and would require additional maintenance, at least until a stable plant population was established. Increase areas of pervious surface and tree and brush cover density in proposed parking lot landscaping areas to provide additional interception of rainwater. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-85 November 2003 • Infiltrate roof drain discharges rather than the proposed surface discharge. Utilizing infiltration generally would require retaining larger areas of undisturbed soils. This could require changes in the existing site plan, which employs mass grading to level the site. On this site, there may be opportunities for infiltration within existing buffer areas to wetlands and streams, depending upon soil and other conditions. • Use roof parking, underground parking, or a multi -level parking garage to reduce the total area of impervious surface and allow retention of a greater percentage of the site in open space. The cost of such alternatives, however, would be significantly greater than the proposed surface parking. • Use porous (pervious) pavements on driveways, parking areas, and/or sidewalks. There are two basic types of pervious pavements: — Pavements with voids or holes allow water to pass into pervious soils below. Such pavements are often interplanted with turf to provide a vegetated surface. Establishment of a vegetated surface would be facilitated on portions of the site that are used mostly on Sundays. The weekday parking demand is considerably lower than Sunday demand, resulting in opportunities for lightly used parking areas to grow. These areas are more likely to be able to sustain the growth of vegetation cover. An added advantage of vegetated pavements is maintenance of lower temperature absorption of sunlight as compared to standard pavement. — Pervious pavement (also known as "no fines" concrete). The latter is concrete that eliminates fine sand and consists of cement, coarse aggregates, and water in proportions that provide sufficient paste and bonding ability to glue the coarse aggregates together in a structural pavement that essentially "drinks" liquid. Permeability tests by the concrete industry conducted with 5/8-inch aggregates indicate sufficient drainable capacity in a well -graded 5/8-inch aggregate mix with approximately 20 percent voids for anticipated precipitation in 24-hour and 10- and 25-year storm events received in the Northwest. In both applications, water filters through the pavement to a secondary drainage/filter layer in the ground. This allows for natural recharge of groundwater, much like the natural filtering effects desired in bioswales. These pavements also prevent untreated stormwater from leaving the site. Stormwater Discharge Existing site stormwater flows as unconcentrated groundwater and discharges along the east and west boundaries of the on -site wetlands. The proposed stormwater discharge locations would concentrate these flows in detention/water quality treatment facilities and then discharge them towards the southern boundaries of each of the on -site wetlands. This impact could be mitigated with multiple detention/water quality treatment facilities discharging at multiple points along the existing wetland buffer boundaries. Mitigation for Water Quality Typical Runoff Pollutants Expected runoff pollutants include suspended metals and suspended solids (particulates). The impacts of these pollutants on surrounding waterbodies could be mitigated with the Ecology Manual's (Ecology . 2001) Enhanced Treatment menu in the East Subcatchment. As discussed, the Ecology Manual requires Enhanced Treatment in each of the East and West Subcatchments, while the KCSWDM requires similar treatment only in the West Subcatchments. Enhanced Treatment measures, which target the removal of suspended metals and total suspended solids, include the following items: • Infiltration combined with pretreatment. • Large sand filter. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-86 November 2003 • Amended sand filter. • Stormwater treatment wetland. • Biofiltration swale followed by sand or media filtration. ■ Vegetated filter strip followed by a linear sand filter. • Wetpond followed by sand or media filtration. • Wetvault followed by sand or media filtration. • Combined detention/wetpool treatment followed by sand or media filtration. • Sand filtration followed -by media filtration. Temperature The possible increased temperatures of stormwater discharged from the site during summer months could be mitigated in several ways: • Infiltrating stormwater facility discharges into the soil would cool water as it moves through the ground as interflow and therefore help to maintain stream temperatures. It would also retain water as interflow through the soil (with more gradual discharge to streams) and help to maintain stream baseflows in low -flow months. Infiltration is most easily implemented for water with a low pollutant load, such as the roof drains that would be discharged to Wetland A in the current proposal. Utilizing infiltration generally would require retaining larger areas of undisturbed soils. This could require changes in the existing site plan, which employs mass grading to level the site. • Employment of green roofs also would contribute to decreases in the temperature of runoff from roofs. • Increased shading of paved areas from greater density of tree cover in proposed parking lot landscaping areas would increase shade and decrease runoff temperature somewhat. • Utilization of pervious pavements interplanted with vegetation would reduce temperature of runoff because plants absorb less heat than pavement and also cool through transpiration. • Dense bank cover providing shade around the edges of proposed detention/treatment ponds would also decrease temperature held as standing water in those facilities. Mitigation for Maintenance Activity Impacts caused by sediment removal from stormwater facilities can be decreased if scheduled during periods of little or no rain. Impacts from the possible use of pesticides for sports field maintenance could be reduced or avoided with an Integrated Pest Management Plan, as described in the Ecology Stormwater Manual (Ecology 2001). This source control BMP outlines control of fertilizer and pesticide application, soil erosion, and site debris, and includes the use of pesticides/herbicides only as a last resort. Measures listed as part of this BMP include: • Installation of engineered soil/landscape systems to improve the infiltration and regulation of stormwater in landscaped areas. ■ Prevention of disposing of collected vegetation into waterways or storm drainage systems. • The practice of mulch -mowing. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-87 November 2003 • Disposal of grass clippings, leaves, sticks, or other collected vegetation by composting, if feasible. This BMP is intended to reduce the need for pesticides and/or herbicides, and therefore reduce the overall pollution in stormwater runoff. Mitigation for Erosion and Sedimentation The possible impacts of using level spreaders, described in Section 3.2.3.1 (Impacts of the Proposed Alternative), could be avoided by discharging stormwater facilities into flow dispersion/infiltration trenches. These trenches are described as part of BMP T7.20 in the Ecology Stormwater Manual (Ecology 2001). Also, it is assumed that the conveyance capacity of related streams (as documented in existing technical reports) should not be exceeded with the stormwater detention facilities incorporated in project plans. However, as noted, the proposed stormwater detention facilities are designed to provide Level 1 flow control under current KCSWDM requirements, rather than the Level 2 flow control required by the Ecology Manual (Ecology 2001). The Level 1 facilities are intended to provide mitigation by reducing peak flows, maintaining conveyance capacity, and preventing flooding. Level 2 flow control facilities are intended to protect against erosion and sedimentation in streams caused by flows of smaller intensity but greater duration. Therefore, additional erosion and sedimentation mitigation could be provided by Level 2 flow control. Mitigation for Groundwater Resources The large amount of new impervious surface included in the proposed alternative would reduce the amount of stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. Measures described earlier to mitigate impacts from this land use change would also help to decrease the impacts on groundwater resources. Specifically, the following measures would help to increase groundwater recharge: • Infiltration of roof drain discharges. • Reducing the amount of new impervious area with roof parking, underground parking, or a multi- level parking garage. • The use of porous pavements on driveways, parking areas, and/or sidewalks. Mitigation for Impacts on Wetlands Existing site stormwater flows as unconcentrated groundwater and discharges along the east and west boundaries of the on -site wetlands. The proposed stormwater discharge locations would concentrate these flows in detention/water quality treatment facilities and then discharge them towards the southern boundaries of each of the on -site wetlands. Providing multiple stormwater detention/treatment facilities with discharge points located along the wetland buffer boundaries would help to mimic current groundwater discharge locations and maintain support of wetland vegetation upstream of the discharge locations currently included in the proposed alternative. 3.2.4.2 Construction Impact Mitigation The applicant's proposal, contained in the Technical Information Report (AHBL 2002), states that the proposed alternative would include erosion/sedimentation control features designed to prevent sediment - laden runoff from leaving the site or adversely affecting critical water resources during construction. The Technical Information Report lists TESC BMPs for the proposed alternative as follows: Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-88 November 2003 • Delineation of clearing limits and areas to remain undisturbed during construction. • Cover measures as required in the TESC appendix of the KCSWDM. ■ Stabilization of construction entrances with quarry spalls. • Use of filter fabric/silt fences at the downstream site perimeter for ditch and site runoff protection. ■ Runoff water quality treatment through the use of sediment ponds. • Filter fabric protection of all new and existing catch basins downstream of construction activities. ■ Control of surface water using inceptor ditches to direct runoff from construction areas to sediment traps and ponds. ■ Control of any dust or exposed soils that are dry enough to be transported by wind and affect roadways, drainage ways, or surface waters. It should be noted that additional measures could be incorporated from the updated Ecology Manual (Ecology 2001). These measures include the use of grass -lined channels in place of unlined ditches (allowed under the KCSDWM), which would reduce erosion somewhat. Also, the Ecology Manual does not allow the use of filter fabric alone as a storm drain inlet protection measure, which provides better filtering for stormwater entering the conveyance system. The Ecology Manual contains additional erosion and sediment control BMPs that would help to mitigate impacts described in this EIS. These BMPs include, but are not limited to, the following: • Preservation of natural vegetation during the construction process. • Limiting disturbed areas as practicable. • Maintaining vegetated buffer zones (other than wetland and stream buffers) to filter unconcentrated construction runoff. + Performing earthwork during the dry summer months. • Immediate stabilization of construction roads and parking areas. • The use of polyacrylamide as a cover measure. ■ Erosion prevention techniques such as surface roughening and the use of gradient terraces. ■ The use of pipe slope drains to convey stormwater over steep slopes (such as those on the northeast and southwest boundaries of the project site). • Construction stormwater chemical treatment or filtration to reduce turbidity in the site discharge. ■ Specialized concrete handling. • Providing appropriate on -site storage for fuels and chemicals. • Minimizing the risk of soil contamination during construction by restricting fueling and equipment maintenance to a designated staging area with an impermeable surface, spill containment features, and a spill clean-up kit. • Providing appropriate disposal facilities for wastes generated during construction. ■ Designation of a contractor erosion and spill control lead. • Advanced budgeting and creation of a force -account for TESC measures. Christian Faith Center DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-89 554-2441-009 (02109) November 2003 3.2.5 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The conversion of this undeveloped parcel to urban use would result in changes in runoff patterns and impacts on streams that cannot be completely mitigated by engineered facilities. Some of these impacts include, but are not limited to: • Increase in the amount of precipitation that would become surface runoff, which is currently intercepted and absorbed by forest and shrub cover. This would affect streamflows in low - precipitation summer months and also reduce recharge to wetlands on site. • The rate at which water would reach the streams from detention facilities, which would most likely not match the exact rate produced by ground and vegetation detention. This could affect downstream reaches of the stream by increasing in -stream erosion, side bank erosion, and similar changes in stream morphology. 0 The erosion caused within streams due to moderate -volume, long -duration flows, which may not be entirely prevented by detention facilities. This also would affect downstream reaches of the stream by increasing in -stream erosion, side bank erosion, and similar changes in stream morphology. • Water quality produced through Basic Water Quality. Treatment, which would most likely not match the exact quality produced by soil/groundwater filtration. This could contribute to degradation of water quality and may affect aquatic habitat, as discussed in Section 3.4 (Wildlife, Fish, and Endangered Species). • Removal of a significant amount of vegetation within the development areas and modifications within existing wetland and buffer areas would affect overall stream dynamics in terms of filtering of overland runoff and contribution to stream processes (such as woody debris and habitat productivity related to propagation at the bottom of the food chain, especially insects and other food sources for terrestrial and aquatic species). Impacts of development of this site would combine with impacts of existing and future development to contribute to cumulative impacts on the streams within the basin. The marginal contribution of impacts from this site may be small; however, the cumulative impacts of development of existing and future sites have produced substantial changes in the Hylebos Creek system, as documented in the Executive Proposed Basin Plan for Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound (King County 1991). Impacts can be reduced, but not eliminated, if all applicable state, county, and local requirements are met and appropriate additional mitigation measures are implemented. Appropriate mitigation measures include, but are not limited to, the use of appropriate stormwater management facilities, appropriate BMPs to limit sources of pollution, and appropriate stormwater quality treatment techniques. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-90 November 2003 3.3 VEGETATION AND WETLANDS 3.3.1 Studies and Coordination This section of the EIS includes a discussion of vegetation and wetlands. This section has been prepared based on review of existing data, a peer evaluation of the technical studies provided by the applicant, and qualitative evaluation of likely impacts on wetlands on the site. 3.3.1.1 Upland Vegetation Upland vegetation was described in general terms in the Wildlife Habitat Evaluation/WetlandJStream Evaluation Report authored by AlderNW (May 28, 2002). Further information was obtained from the project SEPA Environmental Checklist (Abbey Road, May 31, 2002). Parametrix biologists observed vegetation across the site on November 7, 2002. 3.3.1.2 Wetlands Wetlands are defined as those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal conditions do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions (FWCC 22.1; WAC 173.22.080; 33 CFR 323). Wetlands on the property and in the vicinity were identified in 1999 by Terra Associates, who followed standard wetland determination and delineation methodology as set forth by the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology 1997). In addition, the wetlands were classified according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Classification of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al. 1979). Wetland boundaries, ratings, and classifications were verified by Sheldon Associates acting as consultants for the City of Federal Way in November 2000. Table 3.3-1 provides the City definitions for wetland ratings (FWCC 22-1257). Table 3.3-1. Federal Way Municipal Code 22-1357 Definitions of Wetland Categories Category I Are wetlands that: A) Contain the presence of species or documented habitat recognized by state or federal agencies as endangered, threatened, or potentially extirpated plant, fish, or animal species; or B) Contain the presence of plant associations of infrequent occurrence, irreplaceable ecological functions, or exceptional local significance, including but not limited to estuarine systems, peat bogs and fens, mature forested wetlands, groundwater exchange areas, significant habitat, or unique educational sites; or C) Have three or more wetland classes, one of which is open water. Category II Are wetlands that are greater than 2,500 square feet in area, do not exhibit the characteristics of Category I wetlands, and meet one of the following criteria: A) Are contiguous with water bodies or tributaries to water bodies which under normal circumstances contain or support a fish population, including streams where flow is intermittent; or B) Are greater than 1 acre in size in their entirety; or C) Are less than or equal to 1 acre in size in their entirety and have two or more wetland classes, with neither class dominated by nonnative invasive species. Category III Are wetlands that are greater than 2,500 square feet in area and do not exhibit those characteristics of Category I or II wetlands. A summary of the wetland information was provided in the Wildlife Habitat EvaluationJWetland/Stream Evaluation Report authored by AlderNW (May 28, 2002). The wetland information was verified by Parametrix field staff in a site visit on November 7, 2002. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-91 November 2003 3.3.2 Affected Environment 3.3.2.1 Upland Vegetation Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive Plant Species Federal and state agency letters (Washington State Priority Habitats and Species Database and USFWS) solicited for the project indicated that no rare, threatened, endangered, or sensitive plant species were known to be present on the site or in the general vicinity (A1derNW May 28, 2002). A formal rare plant survey has not been performed on the site. A1derNW project consultants walked the site several times in spring of 2002 and did not observe rare or endangered plant species (Back 2002 personal communication). It is assumed that there are no rare plant species on the property because: • No rare plants species were observed in 2002. ■ The site is a relatively small habitat area that is well -isolated from larger intact habitats. • There are no extreme or unusual topographic, soil, or geologic features that would likely support rare communities. ■ Wetlands on the site have been disturbed by alterations in duration and amounts of wetland hydrology, and by installation of a sewer line. ■ The site has been disturbed historically by logging, which is likely to have eliminated any rare plant species that might have been present. Existing Vegetation As stated in Section 3.2.3.1 (Impacts of the Proposed Alternative), existing conditions on the proposed site are approximately 90 percent forested and 3 percent wetland, with the remaining 7 percent as a mixture of impervious surfaces, pasture, and grass. Plant species found on the site are listed in Table 3.3- 2. The only area that is not well vegetated is the portion of the property that extends south to front on South 341st Street. This area has been cleared previously and currently is dominated by weedy forbs, grasses, Himalayan blackberry, and Scotch broom. The forest vegetation is well established and uniformly distributed throughout the site and is dominated by generally healthy, mature Douglas -fir. Most of these trees would meet the City code definition of significant trees (FWCC 22-1). In addition to Douglas -fir, there are minor numbers present of Western red cedar and western hemlock in the overstory. Deciduous trees present in minor numbers include madrona, big -leaf maple, red alder, black cottonwood, cascara, Oregon ash, and horse chestnut. A dense understory uniformly covers the site and consists of locally dominant patches of salal, salmonberry, Indian plum, red alder, vine maple, and hazelnut. Also present are ocean spray, huckleberry, red -osier dogwood, and assorted willows. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-92 November 2003 Table 3.3-2. Plant Species Present on the Project Site Vegetation Community Typical Species Common Name Scientific Name Coniferous forest Wetland/deciduous forest Pasture, grass, and weeds Overstory Understory Douglas -fir Western redcedar Salal Swordfern Huckleberry Common snowberry Overstory 1 Pacific willow Black cottonwood Oregon ash Red alder Understory Sitka willow Bentgrass Dandelion Nipplewort Shotweed Himalayan blackberry Scotch broom a Approximate proportion of the area occupied within the site (percent). Pseudotsuga menziesii Gaultheria shallon Polystichum munitum Vaccinium ovatum Symphoricarpos albus Mahonia aquilaliurn_ Salix lucida Populus balsamifera Fraxinus latifolia Alnus rubra Salix sitchensis Rubus spectabi Agrostis sp. Taraxacum officinale Lapsana communis Cardamine oligosperma Rubus discolor The existing forest vegetation currently functions to provide significant amounts of rainwater interception, provides organic material to the forest soil, and facilitates soil porosity. These hydrologic functions help to reduce stormwater runoff. The vegetation provides cover and forage for arthropods, amphibians, birds, and small mammals (see Section 3.4, Wildlife, Fish, and Endangered Species). The forest vegetation contributes significant primary production and temperature attenuation and supports active nutrient cycling both above and below ground. 3.3.2.2 Wetlands Wetlands provide significant functions and values that arise from both living and nonliving components and include processes necessary for the self -maintenance of the ecosystem, such as primary product production and nutrient cycling. Specific wetland functions include wildlife habitat, critical groundwater recharge, additions of organic matter to stream food webs, nutrient cycling, sediment trapping and other improvements in water quality. In addition, wetlands are valued for their ability to provide floodwater storage capacity that attenuates floodwater peaks downstream. Three wetland areas are located within the parcel boundaries. Two of these areas are associated with headwater streams, and the third area is a hydrologically isolated wetland. Parametrix biologists observed wetland and buffer conditions on the site on November 7, 2002 (Table 3.3-3). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-93 November 2003 Table 3.3-3. Wetlands in the Christian Faith Center Project Vicinity Category Buffer Width Wetland Name (City of Federal (City of and Classification Association Size Way) Federal Way) Wetland A Tributary 0014C to 4.5 acres, Class II 100 feet Palustrine Forested West Branch of approximately 14, 000 SF Hylebos Creek on -site j Wetland B Palustrine Forested Tributary 0016A East Branch Hylebos Creek 1.1 acres total, 54,965 SF on -site Wetland C I Isolated 3,762 SF total Palustrine scrub - shrub SF = square feet Wetland A (Kitts Corner Wetland) Class II 100 feet 25 feet Wetland A is located adjacent to the northwest property corner. The entire wetland is approximately 4.5 acres, with 14,000 square feet on -site (Figure 3.3-1). The City of Federal Way Wetland Inventory identifies this wetland as #16-21-4-74 and rates it as a Category II wetland, Palustrine Forested. The Category II rating was verified by both Terra Associates and Sheldon and Associates. A Category II — Palustrine Forested classification is appropriate for this wetland because it does not meet the Category I criteria for the "presence of species or documented habitat recognized by state or federal agencies as endangered, threatened or potentially extirpated plant, fish, or animal species" (FWCC Sec. 22-1357). A preponderance of evidence indicates that salmonids listed under the Endangered Species Act are not present on or immediately downstream of the site on the West or East Branch of Hylebos Creek as discussed in detail in Section 3.4.2 (Affected Environment). The USFWS's National Wetland Inventory and the Pierce County Soil Survey also indicate wetland in this location. The wetland is currently well -vegetated, mainly with mature willow shrubs and hardback spirea. Sparse herbaceous vegetation includes slough sedge and reed canarygrass. As described in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality), Tributary 0014C of the West Branch of Hylebos Creek flows through the area, providing surface water to the wetland. The stream enters the north portion through a pair of 42-inch concrete culverts beneath South 336th Street and drains at a structure in the southwest corner. The City of Federal Way modified the wetland as part of a flood mitigation program. Four- to six -foot -high earthen berms built along the western and southern wetland boundaries serve to retain stormwater. An 11-inch-diameter adjustable -gate spillway allows the stream to drain to a pipe. Together, the berms and spillway allow for greater volumes of stormwater to accumulate in the wetland than would have been possible in the native configuration and serve to contain and limit wetland conditions along the western and southern perimeter. Wetland drainage leaves through the spillway and flows west through an underground pipe for approximately'/4 mile before draining into an open streambed. In addition to streamflow, water to the wetland is supplied by groundwater discharge that occurs along the eastern wetland boundary along the toe of a moderately steep slope. Groundwater discharge is important because it provides water to the wetland when little or no stream water is entering the site, thus supporting a perennial wetland hydrology. The water that discharges is groundwater interflow that begins as infiltrated precipitation and slowly traverses through the subsurface from higher uplands to discharge at the wetland. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-94 November 2003 Parametrix DATE: 11/13/03 3:05pm FILE: K2441009P02TW-3-3-1 SCALE IN FEET 7L-F� (;) 0 150 300 0' Buffer nd Creation 70 icement Figure 3.3-1 Existing Wetlands The berm to the west and south has increased stormwater retention functions but has reduced wetland and buffer functions that would normally be present in a stream -associated wetland. However, the wetland currently functions to provide organic matter export, stormwater storage, songbird habitat,. and small mammal habitat. Wetland A Buffer A settlement agreement between the City of Federal Way and the landowner as part of the acquisition of the stormwater facility included a definition of the wetland boundary and provided for a 100-foot wetland buffer. A 100-foot buffer is consistent with the City's requirements for Category II Forested wetlands. Wetland buffer conditions on the west, north, and south perimeters of the wetland are poor. A single -lane gravel road in the buffer follows the berm crest on the west and southwest wetland boundaries. The gravel road and constructed berm are sparsely vegetated. Upland tree species were planted adjacent to the western portion of the gravel road, possibly when the stormwater facility was installed; the plantings are now in poor condition and unlikely to provide effective buffer functions. South of the wetland, a narrow jeep track is parallel to the wetland boundary, reducing the area of vegetated buffer. The buffer north of the wetland is formed on the South 336th Street road prism; South 336th Street occupies the outer half of the buffer. In contrast, the wetland buffer east of the wetland is in good condition and largely consists of Douglas -fir overstory with a deciduous mixed -shrub understory. Wetland B Wetland B (approximately 1.1 acres on -site) is a linear, riparian wetland that lies parallel to the eastern boundary of the proposed site adjacent to the east branch of the Hylebos Creek. The wetland is rated as Category II Palustrine Forested (FWCC Sec. 22-1357) due to a preponderance of evidence indicating that salmonids listed under the Endangered Species Act are not present on or immediately downstream of the site as discussed in detail in Section 3.4.2 (Affected Environment). Wetland B is buffered by the undeveloped site. Terra Associates and Sheldon and Associates also reviewed and concurred with the Category II Forested designation. Wetland hydrology is maintained largely by groundwater discharge from the toe of slope along the western wetland boundary. The groundwater source is very likely to include most of the site that is in this basin. Hydrology is also supported by seasonal flows of the East Branch Hylebos Creek and roadway runoff from I-5. The wetland is vegetated mainly with deciduous forest species with a diverse shrub understory. A portion of the wetland was previously disturbed by the installation of a sewer line, and vegetation currently consists of willows, salmonberry, and Himalayan blackberry in this area. Vegetation in the remaining portions of the wetland includes both young and mature Western red cedar, red alder, and black cottonwood trees. Oregon ash is also present in smaller numbers. Herbaceous species lining the ephemeral streambed include creeping buttercup, stinging nettles, water parsley, and bittersweet nightshade. Wetter locations support skunk cabbage. The wetland provides important functions related to water quantity and water quality and may provide significant improvement to the stormwater draining from I-5. The wetland accommodates seasonal flooding and provides flood flow attenuation, resulting in reduction of downstream peak flows and improved water quality during storm events. The wetland functions to provide groundwater discharge supporting stream baseflows, organic matter inputs supporting the aquatic food chain, temperature attenuation protecting organisms from temperature extremes, and sediment control and nutrient retention and cycling that provides increased water quality. These functions are important to the associated stream Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-96 November 2003 system's health. The wetland provides cover and forage for a variety of wildlife that are tolerant of the I- 5 noise. Wetland B Buffer Wetland B is buffered by existing vegetation on the entire site, which exceeds the 100-foot buffer as specified by the City's requirements for Category H Forested wetlands. Buffer vegetation along the length of the wetland is well established and currently in excellent condition. The I-5 road prism limits the buffer area on the eastern portion of the wetland. Vegetation consists of mature Douglas -fir overstory with a component of deciduous trees. Understory vegetation includes salal, sword fern, huckleberry, and vine maple. Considerable noise from I-5 dominates the area, reducing suitability for some wildlife use of the buffer. Wetland C Wetland C (approximately 3,762 square feet) is located in the central portion of the property. Terra Associates and Sheldon and Associates rated the wetland as a Category III Palustrine scrub -shrub. The wetland is hydrologically isolated and does not have a defined inlet or outlet. A seasonally high groundwater table supports wetland hydrology, and the area also functions to provide groundwater recharge. The area is well -vegetated with hardhack spirea, with a fringe of a few Oregon ash trees and willows. The small shrub wetland provides some habitat diversity in an otherwise uniform Douglas -fir forested area. Wetland C Buffer Buffer in this vicinity is in excellent condition and consists of a Douglas -fir overstory with a mixed deciduous shrub understory. 3.3.3 Environmental Impacts 3.3.3.1 Proposed Alternative Upland Vegetation The proposed alternative would directly affect the majority of the forested upland vegetation, resulting in reduction of local plant species diversity, plant structural diversity, and standing biomass. Existing conditions on the site are approximately 90 percent forested and 3 percent wetland, with the remaining 7 percent a mixture of impervious surfaces, pasture, and grass. The fully developed condition would comprise approximately 50 percent impervious surfaces and 50 percent retained sensitive areas, turf, landscaped areas, and retained forest vegetation. Retained native vegetation would include a corridor of existing upland trees and understory that would be preserved along the northern project boundary. Upland vegetation within Wetlands A and B buffers would also be retained. Additional upland vegetation is proposed for planting in buffer enhancement areas (see wetland buffer area below for details). New landscaping would provide turf in playfields and ornamental species in parking strips, roadside plantings, and adjacent to the buildings. These areas of vegetation retention in total appear to satisfy the significant tree retention requirement of the City of Federal Way (FWCC 22-1658). However, because the existing site vegetation currently provides rainwater interception, provides organic material to the forest soil, and facilitates soil porosity, elimination of the majority of the forested vegetation would result in a large decrease in these functions, thus increasing runoff and decreasing stormwater infiltration on the site (Booth 1991, 2000; Reinelt and Taylor 2000). Removal of forest would Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-97 November 2003 decrease plant cover that provides wildlife habitats (see Section 3.4, Wildlife, Fish, and Endangered Species) and would increase temperature in surface water runoff, as discussed in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality). Wetlands No direct impacts are anticipated to Wetland A because no activities are planned to occur within the wetland boundary. Wetland B alteration includes displacement of an area adjacent to South 336th Street to accommodate widening. In addition, regrading is proposed for a 1,500 square foot portion of the existing wetland to establish finished elevations that match those of the wetland created to compensate for displacement of Wetland C. This is designed to provide for hydraulic continuity between the existing and created wetland. Created wetland area is proposed to be 5,400 square feet with an additional 3,500 square feet of wetland enhancement. Some incidental disturbance of the existing wetland can be expected from the adjacent grading. Wetland C (3,762 square feet, Category III) would be filled and displaced by the proposed alternative (Table 3.3-4). Direct Impact Wetland (Area) Wetland A None Wetland B Displacement adjacent to So. 336th Street Regrading to create additional wetland area Wetland C 3,762 SF; entire wetland and buffer to be displaced by proposed alternative Table 3.3-4. Wetland Impacts Indirect Impacts • Alteration in quality, depth, and duration of water • Unstable hydrograph • Reduction of groundwater discharge to the wetland • Roadway directly adjacent to wetland boundary on southern • Alteration in water quality • Increased human intrusion due to proximity • Reduction of recharge functions to groundwater • Reduction of habitat diversity Cumulative Impacts • Reduction of shrub vegetation from prolonged inundation • Decrease in groundwater - dependent wetland hydrology • Decrease of small mammal, songbird, and amphibian habitat potential • Alteration in duration of wetland hydrology • Decrease of wetland area currently dependent on groundwater discharge • Decrease of wildlife use Temporary Construction Impacts • Noise • Sedimentation • Altered hydrology from construction ponds • Noise • Sedimentation • Altered hydrology from construction ponds Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-98 November 2003 Permanent indirect impacts to Wetlands A and B would result from: Reduction of adjacent upland vegetation and reduction in wetland plant diversity that would reduce small mammal, songbird, and amphibian habitat and populations. Loss of habitat connectivity that would result in reduced small mammal and amphibian populations by reducing access to potential habitat. • Changes in the character of hydrology recharging the wetland, which would reduce wetland vegetation cover and diversity. Changes in hydrology, as discussed in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality), include: — Increased stormwater volumes with resulting frequency of inundation from storm events. — Reduction in water temperature attenuation from infiltration and interflow, absorption of solar radiation on pavement and roofs, and loss of shading. — Reduction of stormwater infiltration providing groundwater recharge in low rainfall months. — Increased potentials for water quality deterioration and sedimentation from urban runoff. — Cumulative effects from the loss of stable wetland hydrology, which would reduce wetland vegetation cover and diversity. As stated in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality), the increase of impervious surfaces would result in reduction of groundwater recharge, with non -infiltrated stormwaters draining from the site rapidly as surface water discharges to Wetlands A and B. Specifically, stormwater in the East Subcatchment and West Subcatchment 1 currently discharges as a combination of unconcentrated surface, subsurface, and groundwater flow to the associated wetlands. The proposed development would increase impervious surfaces, reduce subsurface and groundwater flow, and increase collected surface water that would then be released near the downstream end of each of the wetlands. During construction, temporary indirect impacts to Wetlands A and B would include sedimentation, noise and other wildlife disturbance, and alterations to hydrology from temporary stormwater facilities. Wetland A Permanent indirect impacts to Wetland A hydrology include rapid changes in water depth with each storm and associated stormwater discharge, increased water depths in the wetland, and longer durations of deep water due to increased impervious surface in the immediate basin. These unstable hydrologic patterns would not mimic natural patterns and thus would limit the range of plant and animal species that are adapted to use the wetland. Another permanent indirect impact to Wetland A would be reduction of groundwater discharge from the toe of slope along the eastern boundary. The principle local topography and likely local groundwater gradient indicate that the majority of water discharged to this wetland infiltrates in the adjacent upland. With the reduction of groundwater discharge, the wetland would become drier during seasons when precipitation is low. Together with the increase in depth during the wet months and reduction of groundwater discharge, the wetland would likely change from a fairly high -functioning vegetated wetland to an area that has pond - like features in the wet months with an overall reduction in vegetation diversity (Mitsch and Gosselink 2000). The lack of significant vegetation would result in loss of shading, which provides temperature attenuation, and loss of biomass, which provides vegetative and insect debris to the aquatic food web (Ludwa and Richter 2000). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-99 November 2003 Permanent indirect impacts to Wetland A would occur with the development of an access roadway immediately adjacent to the wetland's southern extent. No buffer would remain between the new roadway and the wetland. While no fill to the wetland would be required, grading, vegetation removal, and impervious surfaces would be installed directly adjacent to the wetland. This would increase sun exposure and reduce shade, therefore changing vegetation patterns. The reduction in buffer function would. change wildlife use of wetland habitat by introducing disturbance from proximity impacts such as noise. Species more sensitive to disturbance would reduce use of portions of the wetland near the proposed driveway. As mentioned in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality), pollution -generating surfaces such as streets and parking lots degrade water quality. Stormwater collected from these surfaces may contain a variety of materials such that even with engineered water quality treatment, water quality deteriorates from incomplete nutrient retention and chemical degradation. i?A , 0 TO VI Permanent indirect impacts to Wetland B hydrology include reduction of groundwater recharge/discharge functions from conversion of the balance of the site from forest to largely impervious surfaces. Based on the topography and the likely regional groundwater gradient, the adjacent upland supplies infiltrated water that discharges in Wetland B. Without groundwater discharge in Wetland B, the wetland would likely be drier year-round than under the current condition. Decrease in the abundance of wetland plant species that are intolerant of drier conditions is then likely. An increase in facultative plant species in the wetland could occur. Importantly, the discharged waters provide baseflow support to East Branch Hylebos Creek and loss of this support would alter the stream's hydrograph. Wetland C Wetland C would be displaced by the project. The elimination of Wetland C would contribute to increases in surface water runoff quantities by reducing infiltration, but the impacts of elimination are minor because the area of the wetland is small compared to the amount of impervious surface resulting from development of the site. The provision of a greater area of replacement wetland and buffer would provide greater values for infiltration of precipitation than retention of the existing wetland. The wetland itself would be eliminated together with existing wetland habitat. The replacement wetland area proposed adjacent to Wetland B may replace wetland values, but may degrade the existing quality of Wetland B due to erosion and sedimentation from grading. Impacts can be mitigated most effectively by construction during the driest season of the year, installation of effective erosion control, and effective revegetation. The construction of the replacement wetland would involve grading to reproduce natural wetland hydrology and planting to reproduce wetland vegetation. Artificial wetlands rarely have an equal function to natural wetlands that have evolved over a long period of time. However, the difficulty in accurately describing wetland function limits the ability to predict whether functions have been replicated. One means of providing greater assurance of replicating function is providing a greater replacement ratio. Adding additional area provides a greater assurance that values would be replicated, even if the created wetland is not of as high quality as a naturally evolved wetland. A greater area provides for a greater margin of error. The proposal includes a 1.5:1 replacement ratio. The quality of vegetation within the replacement area, however, would not match the quality of the existing wetland for a number of years and therefore would not replicate habitat and other values for a number of years. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT- Environmental Impact Statement 3-100 November 2003 The construction of replacement wetland area adjacent to Wetland B may adversely affect the existing wetland by increasing erosion and sedimentation. The disturbance of existing stable vegetation also may introduce invasive species. This could adversely affect plant diversity in the existing wetland. Buffers The proposed alternative would alter portions of existing buffer conditions for Wetlands A and B. In both cases, the buffer functions provided by the undeveloped site would be reduced to a 100-foot-wide area of retained vegetation. Direct impacts to Wetland A buffer consist of removal of 16,316 square feet of buffer at the southern tip of the wetland resulting in no buffer in this area. The majority of the buffer area to the south of the wetland is currently occupied by a gravel roadway and sparse vegetation. The area would be improved as part of the proposed alternative to provide an access roadway with curbs, gutters and a walkway. The loss of the buffer will likely affect wildlife use of the site through direct line -of -sight disturbance from the ability to view cars and pedestrians on the roadway and from associated noise. The remaining portions of buffer to the east of the wetland are vegetated with Douglas -fir and associated understory species. The proposed alternative includes addition of 18,902 square feet of buffer area along the easterly side of the wetland to compensate for the area displaced to the south. This will increase the width of the buffer up to 130 feet in places. A portion of the proposed mitigation buffer area is affected by regrading for stormwater level spreaders. The displacement of the buffer area associated with Wetland C includes proposed replacement adjacent to Wetland B. The replacement area of buffer is 11,974 square feet, slightly more than the 8,425 square feet displaced. The dimension of the buffer is 100 feet from the boundary of the replacement wetland area, as well as from the existing unaltered wetland. This area would provide habitat value of greater value than the buffer area provided if Wetland C were retained as an isolated wetland near the center of the developed site and is also of greater value because the 100 foot buffer area has greater habitat diversity than the 25 foot buffer requirement for a Category III Forested wetland such as Wetland C. This is because the habitat adjacent to Wetland B is part of a continuous stream corridor that can be acccessed by a variety of terrestrial species. The value of the replacement wetland and buffer area is dependent on the successful design and construction of regrading and planting for the replacement wetlands and follow-up to ascertain whether the criteria for hydrology of the replacement area is met. If the replacement area is not hydrologically adequate, the quality of the wetland plantings would not replicate natural conditions. The provision in Federal Way codes for a 5-year monitoring program, and the employment by the City of qualified reviewers, together with a performance bond of 120 percent of the cost of installation, provides a high probability of successful establishment of a wetland replacement if monitoring is stringent, if criteria are clear, and if enforcement of reconstruction requirements occurs. Indirect impacts to buffers would be similar for both wetlands and would include loss of upland connectivity with fragmentation and isolation, invasive plant species colonization, noise, and lighting disturbance that would reduce habitat suitability for wildlife. Impacts during construction would include noise and associated disturbance to wildlife, damage to rooting zones that extend into the construction area, and incidental damage from fencing and construction equipment movement. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-101 November 2003 3.3.3.2 Impacts of the No-Action/Business Park Alternative Upland Vegetation Impacts to vegetation by the business park alternative would be the same as impacts to vegetation in the proposed alternative. The majority of the forest vegetation on the site would be removed, with approximately the same amount of residual forest retained by the business park alternative. Depending on the type and distribution of buildings and other impervious surfaces, the residual forest would be located in areas different from the proposed alternative. The impacts to wildlife habitats, stormwater volumes, and water quality would be largely the same as or slightly higher than the proposed alternative because the portion that is ball fields in the proposed alternative would be impervious surfaces in the business park alternative. Wetlands Impacts to Wetlands A, B, and C by the business park alternative would largely parallel the impacts of the proposal. Direct impacts to Wetland A or B would likely be avoided, and Wetland C would likely be filled. Indirect impacts would be similar as well. The minor change in the type and increased intensity of uses of impervious surface would result in some degradation to water quality; however, additional stormwater treatment would likely be required. Water quality would be similar, with slightly greater impacts expected due to greater impervious surfaces. Like the proposed alternative, it is assumed that the business park alternative would use Wetland A as stormwater detention, thus impacts to this wetland would be the same as in the proposed alternative. Effects to Wetland B would be similar in this alternative as in the proposed alternative, with larger changes in groundwater interception due to the lack of play fields. Overall stormwater quantities discharged to the wetlands would remain roughly the same for the business park alternative as in the proposed alternative. Buffers Direct and indirect impacts to wetland buffers are assumed to be approximately the same. However, this is dependent on the location and distribution of buildings and other impervious surfaces. For example, direct impacts to the Wetland A buffer could be less than in the proposed alternative if the existing buffer character was retained. 3.3.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts Potential cumulative impacts relate to future road improvements to serve future increases in transportation demand, including demand from this project. 336th Street Widening A potential cumulative impact to Wetland A buffers is likely to occur from future widening of South 336th Street northwest of the project boundary. This widening is not expected to result in wetland displacement because the existing fill slope from the existing roadway can accommodate a widened roadway with employment of retaining walls rather than the 2:1 slope currently in place. The current buffer area vegetation and habitat and shading will be lost. The future roadway improvements will be closer to the wetland and result in potential line -of -sight impacts to wildlife using the wetland. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-102 November 2003 21st Avenue Extension Future extension of 21st Avenue to the south of the site to provide a connection between South 341st Street to South 344th Street may affect wetlands to the east of the existing alignment of the street. Three alternative alignment options have been identified for the extension of 21st Avenue South as indicated in Figure 3.3-2. Streams and wetlands in the area were assessed by Parametrix field biologists in August 2003. A field reconnaissance was conducted to identify wetlands and streams within 50 feet of the alignment alternatives. Formal wetland boundary delineation was not performed as part of this work. Based on observations made in the field, an approximate location of the wetland boundary was sketched on an aerial photograph of the vicinity. Tributary 0016A to East Branch Hylebos Creek drains from the north adjacent to Interstate 5 onto the property. The stream appears to drain into an existing culvert that conveys the stream across the property to the opposite boundary at a point approximately 200 feet north of the southwest corner. Here, the stream daylights for approximately 6 feet before re-entering a second culvert, which appears to be routed to the southwest across the adjacent trailer parking lot to a vault on the north side of South 344th Street. A third culvert then crosses South 344th Street where the stream again daylights in a natural channel. Wetland occurs in an approximately triangular shaped area in the northwest portion of the WSDOT parcel and extend about half way down the east side of the existing right-of-way between the current 21st Avenue South terminus and South 344th Street as indicated in Figure 3.3-2. Approximately 1/3 of the wetland has been disturbed by frequent recreational vehicle use. In the disturbed area, vegetation is lacking and soils are churned by tire tracking. In the vegetated portion of the wetland, young black alder (Alnus rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) trees form the overstory. Understory plants include Pacific willow (Salix lucida), Sitka willow (Salix sitchensis) slough sedge (Carex obnupta), Douglas spirea (Spiraea douglasii), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) and occasionally Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) saplings and seedlings. At the time of the field investigation, no surface water was located in any portion of the wetland and soils were dry. Secondary indicators of wetland hydrology that were present included water stained leaves; drainage and sediment patterns; and previously saturated soils indicated by deep wheel ruts. Some portions of the wetland soil showed evidence of long-term inundation with low chroma colors and dry surface soils with puddled and cracked soil structure. Hydrology in the wetland appears to be primarily supported by stream flow that overflows out of the gap between the first two culverts described above. This overflows into the wetland drains towards the northern property line of the WSDOT parcel. The stream does not appear to recharge the wetland through a connection at the northeast corner of the property. The amount of stream overflow to the wetland could not be determined during. Groundwater discharge appears to also support wetland hydrology, but to a lesser extent. Surface drainage from the adjoining properties also appears to reach this wetland area. While the wetland is hydrologically connected to the Tributary to the East Branch of Hylebos Creek, the culvert restricts the interaction between the stream and the wetland. In addition, the wetland functional capability is reduced by the lack of vegetated buffers and by stormwater runoff from the adjacent parking lot to the east and the industrial property to the north. While stream does not flow through the wetland, the hydrologic connection between the stream, which is probably the major water source, indicates that the wetland is properly classified under the Federal Way Land Use Code as a Type 11 Wetland, as is shown on City GIS records. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-103 November 2003 if S 344TH ST . ` WETLAND f' it ! LIL Ql N r J +fI I A rr/ rr f t XISTING CULVERT r , i s� 1 �i � zF f � F r r � Parametrix DATE: 09/30/03 12:16pm FILE: K2441009P02T14—F03-3-02 LEGEND Figure 3.3-2 SCALE IN FEET OPTION A- WIDEN EXISTING ROW Christian Faith Center �_� ® OPTION B -NEW ROW TO WEST 21 st Avenue South 0 50 100 �� OPTION C - NEW ROW TO EAST Alignment Options The southerly portion of the property appears to have been previously cleared of vegetation and topsoil. Currently much of the existing soil is compacted and some areas are disturbed by ongoing recreational vehicle use (mud bogging). It is possible that much of the southerly portion of the parcel was once wetland. Vegetation in the southern one-half of this rectangular property is nearly completely dominated by Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). Also present with the blackberry are Scots broom (Cytisus scoparius), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), tansy (Tanacetum vulgare), orchard -grass (Dactylis glomerata), wheatgrass (Agropyron sp.), bentgrass (Agrostis ssp.), and a variety of herbaceous weedy annual plants. Several large mature Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata) trees are located within the easterly portion of the site near I-5. Six to eight 10- to 20- year-old Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) trees are growing in the vicinity of the southeastern property corner. Vegetation near the northeastern corner is comprised of young Douglas fir with hazelnut (Corylus cornuta) and Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) in the understory. This area appears to have had less soil disturbance and compaction than the southern portion of the property. The extension of the roadway along the existing right-of-way (Option A) or to the east (Option C) would displace substantial areas of wetland and buffer as indicated in the cross section in Figures 3.3-3 and 3.3- 5. The westerly corridor (Option B) as indicated in the cross section in Figure 3.34 would be constructed on current impervious surface used for parking. Wetland area would not be displaced, but the roadway would be within the wetland buffer and may introduce additional proximity impacts, as compared to the existing use of the parking lot for truck storage. Water quality impacts to the wetland would likely be less than existing runoff from the gravel surface of the parking lot due to incorporation of stormwater detention and treatment into the proposed road extension. The central corridor, along the alignment of the existing 21st Avenue South (Option A) would require fill of up to 12 feet near end of the existing roadway at the north to 4 to 6 feet of fill near South 344th Street. A few feet of the existing right-of-way is at the level of the parking area to the west. The majority of the new roadway would be on a steep slope heavily vegetated by alder and cottonwood. The 6" to 10" diameter of the largest trees on the slope indicates that it was probably created by fill of the parking lot to the east in the 1960s. A portion of the wetland at the foot of the slope would be displaced. The extent of displacement will depend on whether fill slopes or retaining walls are employed. The cross-section provided in Figure 2-7 in the transportation section indicates a fill slope as a conservative case. This alternative is estimated to displace about 11,000 square feet of wetland (about a quarter acre). The wetland area displaced is the highest quality vegetation community on the site, rather than the portion disturbed by recreation vehicle. In addition, it would displace all of the buffer area on the east side of the wetland. Buffer vegetation could be replaced on the roadway fill slope, but would not be equal in quality. The westerly corridor along the east side of the parking lot to the west (Option B) would as shown would not displace existing wetlands or disturb the existing buffer, except at the northeast corner of the corridor where it transitions from the existing roadway where some fill might be needed. It is possible that fill in the existing wetland or buffer could be avoided by starting the transition to the west further to the north. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-105 November 2003 EXISTING T UTILITY STRIP 4' PLANTER 6' B' PARKING SIDEWALK i WEST LINE EXISTING ROW EXISTING PARKING LOT 12' LANE EXISTING ` WATER LINE EXISTING GROUND e ParametrIX DATE: 09/30/03 12:02pm FILE: K2441009P02T14-F03-3-03 NEW STF'��T EDGE OF WETLAND T UTILITY STRIP Figure 3.3-3 SCALE IN FEET Standard Road Width Christian Faith Center 21st Avenue South 0 5 10 Route Option A 3' UTILITY STRIP - 6' SIDEWALK 6' SIDEWALK f 4' PLANTER 4' PLANTER F f R' 19, 1Of Q' PARKING LANE LANE PARKING 1 Parametrix DATE: 09/30/03 12:05pm FILE: K2441009P02T14-1`03-3-04 EXISTING WATER LINE WEST LINE EXISTING ROW - 3' UTILITY STRIP 20' EXISTING q EXISTING GROUND -?-- EDGE OF WETLAND Figure 3.3-4 Standard Road Width Christian Faith Center 21st Avenue South Route Option B CL EXISTING ROW T UTILITY STRIP WEST EDGE EXISTING ROW 20' EDGE OF WETLAND c Parametrix DATE: 09/30/03 12:12pm FILE: K2441009P02T14-1703-3-05 NEW STREE" q 1 12' LANE 8' PARKII T UTILITY STRIP Figure 3.3-5 SCALE IN FEET Standard Road Width Christian Faith Center 21st Avenue South 0 5 10 Route Option C Stormwater detention and treatment incorporated in the road design would likely decrease pollutants from runoff as compared to the sheet runoff from the existing gravel parking lot. Compacted gravel has essentially the same runoff character as paved surfaces, but includes particulate matter in runoff, as well as heavy metals and petrochemicals associated with motor vehicles. The easterly corridor (Option C) would pass through the existing wetland and would potentially displace up to four tenths of an acre of wetland, including undisturbed wetlands in the northwest corner of the site and disturbed wetlands to the south. The alignment shown in Figure 3.3-2 indicates the transition to the east occurring south of the existing improved roadway and crossing the wetland below the widest portion of the wetland. This alternative would have the greatest impact on wetland function by splitting the wetland into two isolated fragments. The resulting wetland areas would likely experience a change in the character of existing surface water hydrology. Even if culverts allowed water to pass under the new roadway, the flow patterns and amount of flow would not likely be replicated. The weight of the fill may impede groundwater flow. The two smaller isolated wetlands would experience a reduction in size and diversity of vegetation communities. The reduction in diversity and fragmentation would lead to a reduction in small mammal, songbird, and amphibian habitat and populations. The loss of buffers would add to direct line -of sight impacts to species using the existing wetlands. City, State and Federal wetland regulations generally discourage- wetland displacement for road construction if there are alternatives. The amount of wetland displacement for any of the options is likely to be less than 1/2 acre and qualify for a US Army Corps of Engineers Section 401 Nationwide Permit, however it is not clear that adequate area is available for compensatory mitigation on the WSDOT site without compromising WSDOT plans to develop stormwater detention and treatment facilities on the site. The Federal Way Zoning Code (22-1359(c)) allows essential public facility, public utility or other public improvements in a regulated wetland buffer based on a determination that the line or improvement must traverse the buffer because no feasible or alternative location exists based on an analysis of technology and system efficiency. Potential mitigating measures for wetland displacement from these alternative alignments is discussed in Section 3.4, below. Regional Growth Cumulative impacts to wetlands and vegetation also result from regional urbanization. This urbanization results in habitat fragmentation and isolation of natural areas. Wetlands become isolated from functioning upland and lake habitats, resulting in reduction of habitat support for species that rely on wetlands for some life stages or activities. Urbanization also provides increased opportunities for degradation such as vegetation disturbance, non-native species invasion, and alterations and destabilization of hydrologic functions. Secondary and cumulative wetland impacts occur off -site largely due to ever-increasing areas of impervious surfaces. Cumulative impacts from reduction of forest cover, and the resulting decreased interception, accumulate basin -wide to cause wetland degradation from increased hydrologic intensities, prolonged durations, and depths. These impacts are partially mitigated on -site through stormwater retention, but because compensation for loss of interception in particular is not provided, these effects culminate in impacts that reach beyond the site. Accumulated conversion of native habitats to urban settings results in habitat fragmentation and causes an island effect where species abundance and distribution is severely eroded. Loss of species from some habitats results because no connectivity remains to allow recolonizing, even though some suitable habitat may remain (see Section 3.4, Wildlife, Fish, and Endangered Species). Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-109 November 2003 3.3.5 Mitigating Measures Impact mitigation includes the following ordered steps: 1. Avoid the impact altogether. 2. Minimize the impact. 3. Reduce the impact over time. 4. Rectify the impact. 5. Compensate for the minimized unavoidable impact. 3.3.5.1 Vegetation Mitigation incorporated into the proposal to lessen impacts from vegetation removal includes retaining and enhancing perimeter landscaping that meets or exceeds code requirements. Existing trees and other vegetation are proposed to be retained in this area, with the exception of where regrading is required to accommodate the 20th Avenue South extension, the westerly driveway access, grading for the recreation area, and parking lot grading, which encroaches up to 20 feet into this landscape area. Retention of partial stands of existing trees only on the perimeter of cleared sites often subjects remaining trees to extensive root damage and soil compaction, and may result in windthrow and substantial reduction of retained trees. Specific opportunities to retain substantial stands of existing vegetation would require accurate survey location of existing trees and their root zones, together with understory. The major factor in retention would be choice of species or stands with an age structure and species mix less susceptible to windthrow damage from adjacent clearing. Additional factors include (1) adequate area for infiltration to support the stand without irrigation and (2) habitat issues, including large enough area to provide support for wildlife, or linkage into corridors to provide wildlife movement and prevent isolation of potential habitat. Protection during construction involves a number of measures, including: ■ Providing effective fencing with adequate clearance for root zones. • Minimizing damage to roots due to interception by grading. • Watering during low -rainfall periods to reduce stress and encourage growth of replacement root area. • Maintenance measures, such as pruning of dead or dying limbs and pruning to reduce "sail area" and risk of windthrow. The identification of stands. of trees with benefits for preservation would need to be matched with redesigned elements of the site plan, which could include building location, driveway location, parking lot configuration, and location and size of landscape areas to fit into the opportunities provided by the location of high -quality vegetation. Retention of existing stands of trees on the site can contribute to maintaining hydrologic functions (such as interception, infiltration, temperature attenuation of runoff through shading) and provide wildlife functions for some birds that use small habitat patches. Provision of additional stands of trees within the site may result in a reduction in parking supply, unless consolidation of required parking islands is allowed by the local code. Tree retention areas are most feasible between parking bays where the area is sized to allow for full root area retention. Conventional development requires logging of the overstory throughout the majority of the site and removal of understory and native soils to provide suitable flat surfaces for buildings and other impervious surfaces. The current plan includes substantial regrading of most of the site, with a change from existing Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-110 . November 2003 grade of up to 10 feet at places along the westerly wetland buffer and 8 feet along the easterly buffer. Retention of existing trees would require maintaining existing grades in the areas retained and would result in retaining areas of high -functioning native soils, ameliorate some reduction of interception and infiltration, and mitigate temperature extremes. Limiting grading to better preserve existing overstory would involve identifying areas to be saved and designing the grading around those areas. This would likely involve multiple steps to parking lots and substituting larger stands of existing trees for small planter islands. Because conventional ornamental landscape trees and shrubs generally fail to provide substantial, hydrologic or wildlife functions, these areas are not considered to provide mitigation for the impacts that result from losses of mature native forest vegetation. Tree planting in parking areas can provide some beneficial shading and cooling benefit to reduce heat retention by parking lot surfaces. This shading, combined with infiltration of surface water runoff can provide some mitigation for water temperature impacts. 3.3.5.2 Wetlands Avoidance Measures Incorporated into the Proposal Direct impacts to wetlands have been mitigated through the complete avoidance of displacement impacts to Wetlands A and limiting direct impacts to Wetland B to an area of regarding for hydraulic continuity with created wetlands. Compensation Measures Incorporated into the Proposal The proposal provides compensation for the fill of the 3,762-square foot Wetland C through wetland creation adjacent to Wetland B and enhancement of a portion of Wetland B (Table 3.3-5). Wetland creation would require regrading adjacent upland to lower elevations, followed by planting with wetland plants. Approximately 5,400 square feet of created wetland is proposed on site with an additional 3,500 square feet of wetland enhancement. This meets the required mitigation area ratio 1 to 1.5 for a shrub/scrub wetland, as determined by the City of Federal Way (FWCC 22-1358). Table 3.3-5. Wetland Mitigation Incorporated in Proposal Wetland Water Quantity Mitigation Water Quality Mitigation Wetland A Roof runoff by level spreader in wetland buffer; New pond near south section of remainder of surface water as concentrated flow from new Wetland A water quality pond to southwest corner of Wetland A Wetland B Two new ponds; concentrated discharge would occur at the Same facility as for water quality; southeast corner of wetland no additional water quality treatment Wetland C Compensation provided as wetland creation/restoration Not applicable adjacent to and part of Wetland B Direct impacts to Wetlands A and B have been mitigated through the avoidance of direct displacement. A critical criterion for successful wetland creation is adequate hydrology of the replacement area. If the replacement area is not hydrologically adequate, the quality of the wetland plantings would not replicate natural conditions. Federal Way codes (FWCC 22-1358) provides for a 5-year monitoring program and the employment by the City of qualified reviewers, together with a performance bond of 120 percent of the cost of installation. These measures ensure a high probability of successful establishment of a wetland replacement; if monitoring is stringent, if criteria are clear, and if enforcement of reconstruction Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-111 November 2003 requirements occurs if initial design and installation is unsuccessful. In addition, 1,500 square feet of existing Wetland B would be graded to establish grades that match the wetland creation area. This re- created area would also be planted with native shrubs. The disruption of existing established plant communities runs the risk of introducing weed species and a less productive overall plant community. And finally, 2,000 square feet of Wetland B would be planted with native shrubs and trees to replace existing invasive non-native species (A1derNW 2002). Minimization of Impacts Incorporated into the Proposal Mitigation for indirect impacts for potential water quality issues has been provided through a water quality treatment pond near Wetland A (see Section 3.2, Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality). Separate mitigation for water quantity increases to Wetland A has not been provided because the settlement agreement and design of the City -constructed detention facility assumed providing detention for the westerly portions of the site that naturally drain to it. Indirect impacts for water quality and quantity have been provided for Wetland B through two storm ponds. In addition, Wetland B would be enlarged through wetland mitigation. Additional Mitigating Measures Avoidance of Direct Impacts Avoidance of direct impacts to Wetland C through retention would require substantial adjustments to the parking layout and building configuration in the proposed alternative. Because of the sanctuary building's central location on the site and the circular configuration of the wetland and buffer area, retaining the wetland would be more disruptive to parking lot layout and traffic and pedestrian circulation than the proposed more linear buffer compensation areas. To retain Wetland C, the proposed sanctuary building would likely require relocation, probably to the north near the proposed 50-foot landscape buffer and closer to the residential area. Reconfiguration of the nearly square building design to a more rectangular design could accommodate greater flexibility for parking lot design and accommodate a circulation design incorporating the retained wetland. In addition, retention of the wetland would break up the large area of impervious surface, provide for infiltration, provide shade for heat reduction, provide habitat for birds and small mammals, and provide visual relief. Retained trees in the wetland buffer area would be subject to reduction through windthrow as a result of removal of the surrounding tree canopy. Minimization of Impacts Reduction of groundwater recharge to Wetland B due to the location of the stormwater discharge location downstream of the majority of the wetland can be mitigated by use of multiple detention/water quality treatment facilities discharging at multiple points along the wetland buffer. These dispersion/infiltration trench systems collect drainage from impervious surfaces but have the advantage of not concentrating all the water at a single point. Potential impacts to the wetland from erosion and sedimentation from a level spreader discharge point for stormwater discharge can be mitigated by alternative designs. Significant reduction of indirect impacts from increased water quantities would be possible through collect/reuse systems, dispersion, direct infiltration, and redistributed/retention stormwater management Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-112 November 2003 techniques. Some examples include vegetated roofing, porous pavements, rain gardens, and other active infiltration mechanisms. Decreases of groundwater recharge resulting from diversion of natural infiltration to the stormwater system can be mitigated by several techniques, for example: ■ Retention of additional areas of native vegetation in parking areas. • Collection and reuse as irrigation on site, direct infiltration to the subsurface, and/or dispersion of roof drain discharge rather than routing into the surface drainage system. • Use of porous pavements on driveways, parking areas, and/or sidewalks to promote infiltration and reduce effective impervious surfaces. 3.3.5.3 Buffers The impacts resulting from loss of the existing -buffer area south of Wetland A due to the construction of the driveway access to Pacific Highway South may be avoided or reduced by a number of potential design changes. The most radical change in the site plan would be elimination of the proposed driveway. This would allow retention and enhancement of the existing buffer area. An enhanced buffer area would mitigate proximity impacts of the reduction in existing buffers resulting from site development. The impacts of loss of this driveway would be limited somewhat by its right -in, right -out only design and the provision of alternative access to the westerly driveway access to South 336th Street for the parking stalls located west of the sanctuary building. Traffic which otherwise would use this driveway to access or leave the site northbound on Pacific Highway South would likely be routed to the westerly driveway access to South 336th Street. These additional trips routed through the Pacific Highway South/South 336th Street intersection may result in the need for additional lanes which may result in impacts on the north buffer of Wetland A. A less radical change to the site plan could retain some buffer functions by reconfiguring and relocating the proposed driveway to provide additional separation from the wetland and the impervious surface and planting dense evergreen vegetation. This could provide shade and reduce direct line -of -sight impacts. Reconfiguration could involve reduction in width from 36 feet to 24 feet, or other dimensions, and/or shifting to the south. Relocation could involve changing the proposed curve of the driveway to move the edge of improvements further from the wetland edge. This would involve modification of the existing easement within the parcel to the west and could involve reconfiguration of parking areas, but would not necessarily affect the existing buildings. Additional reduction in buffer impacts could be provided through enhancement to remove any invasive species and provide plantings of vegetation with dense evergreen foliage to block some of the line -of sight impacts from vehicles on the driveway. The density of the vegetation community that can be supported, however, is ultimately dependent on the land area available. Fertile topsoil and plentiful water supply can increase the biomass that can be supported. A program of soil amendment in the areas of the existing berm and gravel roadway could increase the carrying capacity of the buffer area. Long term supplementing of planting by watering and fertilizing could adversely affect water quality in the wetland. Supplemental watering can be most useful in enabling plant communities to become established. Applying context -sensitive landscaping could create a continuum of forest and shrub from the buffer boundary to actively used areas if adequate buffer width is provided. Fencing and signage of sensitive areas would provide a small additional measure of protection from direct disturbance. The value of mitigation provided by increases in buffer area should also be evaluated in terms of the value of the resource and the intensity of adjacent disturbance. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-113 November 2003 3.3.5.4 Mitigation of Indirect and Cumulative Impacts Impact mitigation for off -site impacts includes the strategies outlined above: ■ Avoid the impact. ■ Minimize the impact. ■ Reduce the impact over time. • Rectify the impact. • Compensate for the minimized unavoidable impact. 336th Street Widening The Wetland A buffer displacement is not likely to be avoidable because of the existing location of the roadway and lack of options for widening and sidewalk location. The presence or absence of a left turn lane on this portion of the road is one of the determinants of roadway width and resulting encroachment into the buffer. Sidewalks width could be reduced for the road section adjacent to the wetland, or the planter strip between curb and sidewalk could be reduced or eliminated. These options would need to be evaluated in terms of impacts on vehicular circulation, and safety as well as pedestrian safety and comfort. The likely use of retaining walls within the existing fill slope to avoid wetland displacement will likely provide little area for establishment of buffering vegetation. Some additional buffer function could be provided by stepped retaining walls with a planting area at mid -height. This provides the potential for vegetation reaching the height of the roadway and eventually reducing line -of sight impacts from vehicles on the road. Dense planting can provide somewhat more effective buffer areas. The biomass that can be supported, however, is a function of the land area, soil fertility and water supply. More dense plantings may require supplemental water and nutrients that could adversely affect water quality in the wetland. 21st Avenue Extension The lowest level of wetland impacts could be accomplished with Alignment Option B, the westerly corridor that is largely located on an existing parking lot. Option A, the widening of the existing right-of-way has the next level of impact with Option C to the east creating the greatest impact. Compensation for the impact could include a number of potential actions for Options A and C. These include: ■ Reducing the width of the improved roadway surface as indicated in Figure 3.3-6 and 3.3-7. This would reduce the width of displacement about 30 percent. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-114 November 2003 EXISTING q WEST LINE EXISTING F EXISTING PARKING LOT 20' 14' LANE 5' SIDEWALK - - 6" CURB 2'-I EXISTING o WATER LINE--/ EXISTING GROUND Parametrix DATE: 09/30/03 12:03pm FILE: K2441009P02T14-F03-3-06 20' EAST LINE EXISTING ROW 14' LANE 5' SIDEWALK i 6" CURB 2 2'7 s� Oj°E - EDGE OF WETLAND EAST LINE NEW ROW Figure 3.3-6 SCALE IN FEET Potential Reduced Width to Christian Faith Center Mitigate Wetland Impacts 21st Avenue South 0 5 10 Route Option A EXISTING ROW q WEST EDGE EXISTING ROW 20' `a EDGE OF WETLAND Parametrix DATE: 09/30/03 12:13pm FILE: K2441009P02T14-F03-3-07 14' LANE 5' SIDEWALK 6" CURB 2'� NEW STREET q 14' LANE 5' SIDEWALK 6" CURB 2' Figure 3.3.7 SCALE IN FEET Potential Reduced Width to Christian Faith Center Mitigate Wetland Impacts 21st Avenue South 0 5 10 Route Option C + r I1_ r EXISTING % t WETLAND r I i BRIDGE i' ` STORMWATER FACILITY j E REOPENED I l / STREAM ,.-✓-� I , - FF � J i4 j W Q EXISTING N CULVERTS r f t ABANDONED S 344TH ST � ' :; j• •- f �1i Parametrix DATE: 09/30/03 1:57pm FILE: K2441009P02T14-F03-3-08 LEGEND Figure 3.3-8 SCALE IN FEET OPTION C - NEW ROW TO EAST Christian Faith Center l J� CREATED WETLANDS 21st Avenue South 0 50 100 RESTORE DEGRADED WETLANDS Potential Mitigation 0 Removing the stream from the existing culvert and providing a natural stream channel through the filled portion of the site that would allow more direct hydrologic connections to the existing wetlands and provide riparian habitat. ■ Rehabilitating the disturbed wetlands on the site by fencing to prohibit recreation vehicles and replanting. • Creating new wetlands and associated buffer areas in the southerly portion of the site, in conjunction with opening the stream to provide the needed hydrology. This would require extensive excavation, soil amendment and planting. ■ Bridging the stream with the Option C alignment would provide for a stream corridor across the roadway and would reduce somewhat the fragmentation produced by that road corridor. • Planting some buffering vegetation on roadway fill slopes. The effectiveness of plantings would not be realized for a number of years as they grow and mature. The impacts of additional wetland displacement from the fill slope to allow the buffer would be a net benefit for a vegetation wetland such as this. Potential mitigation measures are located in Figure 3.3-8 on a conceptual plan for Option C. This plan indicates where the measures listed above might be located, but also illustrates the limited area available on the site with a new roadway and WSDOT stormwater facilities. Sufficient area for a 3:1 replacement ratio for displacement from Option C is not likely to be available on the site to the east, with the required buffers for Type H wetlands. The wetland area displaced by Option A could likely be mitigated on the site to the east with the enhancement of degraded wetlands, opening the stream and creation of new wetlands, but the proximity impacts from the loss of the buffer area to the west of the wetland boundary would not be compensated for. As discussed in the Transportation Section above, it is unclear whether the parcel to the east owned by WSDOT is available for right-of-way or wetland restoration or creation, given the WSDOT goal of developing stormwater detention and treatment facilities on the site, and the setback requirements from existing wetlands. The creation of new wetlands with associated buffer areas would reduce the area available on the site for WSDOT improvements. Regional Growth Cumulative impacts from regional urbanization that results in habitat fragmentation and isolation non- native species invasion, and alterations and destabilization of hydrologic functions can be mitigated to some extent on a site -by -site basis. Effective mitigation of cumulative impacts, however would require an approach that would not allow an accumulation of small impacts under a mitigation threshold to occur without requiring mitigation. In addition, to be most effective, mitigation should be concentrated where the resources are most valuable, rather than on a site -by -site basis. This would require a regional strategy to identify and preserve the most important resources and rehabilitate currently degraded resources where the overall benefits would be greatest. Such a regional framework is not in place at the present time. In the absence of such a strategy, an approach of no net loss of function on a case by case basis is likely to be the most effective strategy available. 3.3.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The conversion of this undeveloped parcel to urban use would result in loss of a variety of natural functions that could not be fully mitigated by detention, water quality treatment, or other facilities. These impacts are considered unavoidable at this time and include native vegetation removal. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-118 November 2003 3.3.7 Vegetation and Wetland Regulatory Environment Vegetation removal is regulated under the Washington State Department of Natural Resources forest protection permit, which regulates harvesting volumes and frequency of merchantable timber on private parcels. The Federal Way zoning code requires retention of 75 percent of significant trees on a site, which applies to trees over 12 inches in diameter (FWCC 22-1568). Other vegetation on the site is not regulated unless it occurs in a sensitive area. Laws regulating wetlands include the Federal Clean Water Act (Sections 404 and 401), through which the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulates wetlands as a subclass of Waters of the State. The Sensitive Areas Regulations of Federal Way provide the local regulatory framework. Details of regulatory elements for each jurisdiction are summarized in Table 3.3-6. Table 3.3-6. Summary of Federal, State, and Local Wetland Regulations U.S. Army Corps of City of Federal Way Washington Department of Ecology Engineers Permitting and . Federal Way Community Executive Order 89-10: Protection of , Federal Clean Water Regulatory Code 22-1328 Wetlands under Section 401 of the Act, Section 404 Mechanism l Clean Water Act Wetland Three Wetland Four Wetland Categories (defined in Does not classify Classification System Categories Category 1 = 200 ft Ecology 1993) j Recommended wetlands Buffer Requirements Regulates buffers in Category II = 100 ft Category I = 200 to 300 ft some circumstances. Category III Category II = 100 to 200 ft <10,000 SF = 50 ft Category III = 50 to 100 ft >10,000 SF = 25 ft Category IV = 25 to 50 ft Buffer Modifications Buffers can be averaged Not addressed Not addressed or modified subject to conditions and approvals Recommended Ratios Mitigation is determined Wetland Creation Compensation Category t 6:1 all types Category I on a case by case basis Ratios Category 11 Category 11 Forested 3:1 Category III Forested 3:1 Scrub -shrub 2:1 Scrub -shrub 2:1 Emergent 2:1 Emergent 2:1 Category 111 Category IV = 1.25:1 Forested 2:1 Scrub -shrub 1.5:1 Emergent 1.25:1 Enhancement Category 1. 12:1 all types Category 11: Forested 6:1 Scrub -shrub 4:1 Emergent 4:1 Category 111 Forested 4:1 Scrub -shrub 3:1 Emergent 2.5:1 Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-119 November 2003 3.4 WILDLIFE, FISH, AND ENDANGERED SPECIES This section of the EIS includes a discussion of existing terrestrial and aquatic habitat and species located on the proposed project site and downstream aquatic habitat and species potentially affected by development of the site. Project activities around streams frequently generate impacts distributed downstream from their point of origin and affect aquatic biota (plants and animals) and the habitat upon which they depend. This section has been prepared based on review of existing data, a peer evaluation of the technical studies provided by the applicant, and qualitative evaluation of likely impacts. Proposed mitigation has been evaluated for potential impacts identified, including measures to enhance Hylebos Creek within the project boundaries. 3.4.1 Studies and Coordination Information pertinent to fisheries and wildlife resources for the proposed project were drawn from a number of pre-existing documents. Field evaluation of wildlife species and habitat was completed by AlderNW over the course of several site visits conducted between March and May of 2002. A site visit was conducted; however, the field inspection was for the purpose of familiarization with site conditions and did not constitute new research into any issues addressed in this document. Existing documentation used for this report includes, but is not limited to, the following: Description of the Hylebos Creek Basin was largely taken from the King County Surface Water Management Executive Proposed Basin Plan Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound. While over a decade old, this document contains thorough descriptions of the geologic, geomorphic, hydrologic, and development factors shaping the environmental landscape of the basin. Information relating to recent stormwater facility updates was taken from the Technical Information Report prepared by AHBL for The Abbey Road Group. • Information related to fisheries and wildlife present in the basin was collected from several sources, including: City of Federal Way Department of Community Development Services - ESA Listed Salmonids Checklist, AlderNW - Responses to Salmonid Checklist, AlderNW - Christian Faith Center Sensitive Area Report, Washington Department of Fisheries - A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization Volume I Puget Sound Region, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife - 2000 Salmonid Stock Inventory (SASI) Coastal Cutthroat Trout Volume, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife - 1992 Salmon and Steelhead Stock Inventory (SASSI) Bluebook, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife -1998 Salmonid Stock Inventory (SASI) Bull Trout/Dolly Varden Volume, and StreamNet on-line fish usage data query. • Information related to habitat and project -related impacts were collected from several sources, including: AlderNW - Christian Faith Center Sensitive Area Report, Terra and Associates - Document 4440-1 Stream Notes, Terra and Associates - Document 4440-1 Notes, AHBL - Technical Information Report, and King County - Summary of Tri-County Model 4(d) Proposal. 3.4.2 Affected Environment 3.4.2.1 Project Site Location The proposed Christian Faith Center occupies a 47-acre site in the upper watershed of Hylebos Creek, in the City of Federal Way, Washington. The property is bounded to the west by Pacific Highway South, to the east by I-5, and to the north and south by South 336th Street and South 341st Place, respectively. The property is currently undeveloped and is occupied by a second -growth forest stand of mixed conifer - deciduous trees. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-120 November 2003 Tributaries to the East Branch and West Branch of Hylebos Creek cross the east and west sides of the property, respectively. Both of these streams, where they cross the property, are seasonal and have associated wetlands, as described in Sections 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality) and 3.3 (Vegetation and Wetlands). 3.4.2.2 Basin Description The Hylebos Creek Basin consists of three subbasins: West Branch, East Branch, and Lower Hylebos Creek. In total, the basin drains 18 square miles of area through more than 25 miles of streams. Land use in the basin is dominated by commercial areas and single- and multi -family residential development. The upper basin, in Federal Way, is heavily urbanized. Moderate to low -density single- family land use is extensive in the East Branch Subbasin and lower reaches of the West Branch Subbasin. Agricultural activity is more prevalent in the East Branch Subbasin, but is also present in the floodplain of the lower West Branch Subbasin. The main stem Hylebos Creek forms in the Lower Subbasin, located in Pierce County, and flows through mixed agricultural and heavy commercial land uses in the valley prior to entering the industrialized Hylebos Waterway and Commencement Bay (King County 1991). West Branch Hylebos Creek The West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin occupies a 4,300-acre area between I-5 to the east and Puget Sound to the west. The subbasin can be further divided into three distinct management areas: the northeast area, the northwest area, and the southern area (see Figure 3.2-1). Tributary 0014C crosses the project site, entering the regional stormwater detention facility in the northwestern corner of the property, identified as Kitts Corner Wetland (Wetland A on site plans). Water is then conveyed via a 1/a-mile-long pipe under Pacific Highway South and discharges to the South 336th Street Detention Facility. The West Branch flows south through a series of wetlands and detention facilities before entering the West Hylebos Wetland, located approximately 1/2 mile downstream, then discharges into the Lower Hylebos Creek Subbasin (King County 1991). In addition to high streamflow, the Basin Plan identifies the lack of adequate streamflow controls in the northeast areas, as well as substantial concerns with respect to water quality pollutants in the southern area of the subbasin downstream of the site. In particular, metals, solids, and fecal bacteria levels associated with commercial areas and livestock were identified as problematic. Metals and solids were also identified as a problem for the West Hylebos Wetland (King County 1991). In response to anticipated stormwater impacts, the Basin Plan proposed construction of regional detention facilities, which were completed in 1997 by Federal Way, as discussed in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality). East Branch Hylebos Creek The East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin is an elongated area east of I-5. North Lake, Lake Killarney, and the Weyerhaeuser Pond constitute the headwaters for the four streams that drain the subbasin. The four streams converge in a ravine southwest of Enchanted Parkway South, about 21/z miles south of the proposed project (see Figure 3.2-2). Tributary 0016A to East Branch Hylebos Creek crosses the east end of the site. It enters the site through a culvert under South 336th Street and drains across the east side of the property. Downstream from the property, the stream has been channelized where it passes through existing commercial developments and Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-121 November 2003 along the I-5 right-of-way. There are three long culverts within approximately 5,000 feet downstream of the project site, where the stream passes through existing developments and the Highway 18 Interchange, and where the stream crosses from the west to the east side of I-5. The tributary has riparian wetlands associated along its entire length through the proposed project site (A1derNW 2002). The ravine area of the East Branch Hylebos Creek historically contained excellent spawning and rearing habitat for salmonids. This area was designated as a Regionally Substantial Resource Area (RSRA), due to the presence of large woody debris and substantial recruitment potential forTurther habitat -enhancing wood components. The Basin Plan (King County 1991) estimates that aquatic habitat and water quality in the East Branch Subbasin have been degraded by higher streamflows resulting from urban development, with current flows up to 50 to 75 percent greater than under previous natural forested conditions. Channel erosion and increased sediment loads were identified as the most substantial impacts degrading water quality and habitat in the subbasin. As for the West Branch Hylebos Creek, the Basin Plan proposed construction of regional detention facilities and other system improvements to address anticipated stormwater impacts in the East Branch Subbasin. 3.4.2.3 Habitat Description A north -south ridge divides the site into two major drainage subcatchments. About 20 acres in the west portion of the site are within the West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin. The east portion of the site, which is about 27 acres, is part of the East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin. A third area of about t/3 acre, consisting of the proposed driveway access to Pacific Highway South, also drains into the West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin. Most precipitation infiltrates, with runoff traveling as sheet and subsurface flow towards the streams draining each area (AHBL 2002). The property is currently undeveloped and is occupied by a second -growth forest stand of mixed conifer - deciduous trees, as described in Section 3.3 (Vegetation and Wetlands). Three wildlife habitat/vegetation cover types have been identified on the property, as described below. These cover types are based on the habitat categories described in the Wildlife Habitat Profile (King County 1987). The characteristics of each of these habitat types were detailed in the AlderNW (2002) report. Wetland areas are described in greater detail in Section 3.3. Mixed Second -Growth Forest Lowland mixed forest is the most extensive vegetation cover type on the property. It covers essentially the entire site outside of the designated wetland areas. The total area of the mixed forest habitat is approximately 43 acres of the total 47-acre property. The mixed second -growth forest habitat is one of the more productive habitats for wildlife species because it includes a relatively large contiguous area and has a diverse community of vegetation. However, the value of this habitat is limited by its relative isolation within the surrounding urban area. Shrub Wetland Shrub wetland conditions are present within the Kitts Corner Wetland (Wetland A), located on the northwest corner of the property. Vegetation in this habitat is dominated by hardhack spirea (Spiraea douglasii) and willows, with some red -osier dogwood (Corpus stolonifera). Trees including black cottonwood, red alder, Pacific willow (Salix lasiandra), and Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia) are present around the margin of the area. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-122 November 2003 The shrub wetland provides potential habitat for a variety of aquatic species, including a variety of amphibians and small mammals such as shrews. The presence of permanent standing water within the wetland provides potential habitat for great blue heron (Ardea herodias) and other waterfowl species. This habitat has relatively low plant species and internal structural diversity. As such, it supports low wildlife species diversity. Riparian Wetland Riparian wetland habitat is found along the east side of the property where the tributary to the East Branch Hylebos Creek crosses the site. This habitat area on the property includes a mix of forest and shrub vegetative cover along with smaller patches of emergent wetland. This habitat type has potential habitat for wildlife species diversity. Because of the presence of the stream, it provides potential habitat for a variety of amphibian species that might not otherwise be found on the property. Most of the species likely to be found in this habitat type are also found in forested habitats. 3.4.2.4 Terrestrial Species Species addressed in this section include amphibians, birds, mammals, and reptiles. The complete list of species observed on -site or expected to potentially occur on -site is presented in the A1derNW Sensitive Area Report (2002). Amphibians and Reptiles No protected amphibian or reptile species were observed on -site. However, these species are generally secretive and not likely to be observed. The cover types on this property, particularly the forested wetland and adjacent second -growth forest, should provide habitat for several species of amphibians. The most likely species to occur on -site are the northwestern salamander (Ambystoma gracile) and long -toed salamander (Ambystoma macrodactylum). Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) may be present in the shrub wetland. The most likely reptiles to be found in the habitats available on this property are the northern alligator lizard (Elgaria coerulea) and various garter snakes (Thamnophis spp.), neither of which are protected. The common Pacific chorus frog (Pseudacris regilla) and common garter snake (Thamnophis sirtalis) were identified during field investigations. Avians No protected bird species were observed on -site. However, WDFW has record of a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest southeast of North Lake, a little more than 1 mile from the project area, on the east side of I-5. While the proposed project site has features that might attract use by bald eagles (e.g., presence of waterfowl prey), the overall habitat value of the site for eagles is diminished relative to more suitable alternative habitat. While eagle occurrence on -site is possible, it is more likely that eagles would associate with higher -quality habitat around the Puyallup River, and Puget Sound. The bald eagle is listed as both a state and federal threatened species, thus falling under the protection of the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended. Additionally, site investigations revealed excavations believed to be created by pileated woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus) (AlderNW 2002). The pileated woodpecker is listed as a state candidate for protection, but has no status at the federal level. Foraging excavations were noted in snags at several locations on the property. Snags are uniformly but sparsely distributed across the site. The property is too small to support a pair of pileated woodpeckers. It is likely that this site is part of a larger foraging territory (A1derNW). More extensive discussion on the life history of both bald eagles and pileated woodpeckers can be found in Appendix B of this document. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-123 November 2003 Because of their high levels of daytime activity and vocalizations, birds are the most commonly encountered group of vertebrates on -site. Some of the commonly observed species on -site were the black -capped chickadee (Parus atricappilus), American robin (Turdus migratorius), winter wren (Troglodytes troglodytes), and song sparrow (Melospiza melodia). A large number of migratory songbirds including flycatchers, warblers, and vireos are expected on this site during the spring and fall. There are standing snags present across the property. These snags provide potential nesting and foraging habitat for a variety of hole -nesting birds such as woodpeckers and chickadees. Northern flickers (Colaptes auratus) were heard on the site as well as black -capped chickadees. Standing snags are uniformly but sparsely distributed across the site, with most snags being in the range of 6 inches to about 14 inches in diameter. Standing snags also provide perch habitat for a number of raptor species. The most likely raptors to use this site are the great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperi), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), and possibly the bald eagle. No raptor nests were observed during site visits, though a red-tailed hawk was heard during the author's site visit on November 11, 2002. The presence of wetlands on -site, specifically wetlands with standing water year-round, ensures the likelihood that waterfowl would be found on -site seasonally or year-round. Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhincos)'were observed using the Kitts Corner Wetland. Other waterfowl, including Canada geese (Branta canadensis), may be present on the wetland at times throughout the year. There is no report of a great blue heron rookery in the vicinity of the property, but individuals may forage within the wetland area. The great blue heron is identified as a state monitor species, though such status does not provide any specific protections. Mammals No protected mammals were observed on -site. Most mammals tend to be secretive and nocturnal, and survey results reflect a relatively small proportion of species that may actually exist on the subject property. The long-eared myotis (Myotis evotis) is the only protected mammal species likely to be present on a wooded site such as this. This bat species, identified as a state monitor species and federal Species of Concern, uses a variety of habitats found on -site for forage and roosting. No specific sightings of this bat species are documented for the site; however, extensive investigations have not been conducted. Observations of unprotected species include coyote (Canis latrans), evidenced by scat observed on trails around the property. A large nest, probably built by an eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), was observed along the north side of the property. Other common mammals that are likely to be present on the site include opossum (Didelphis virginiana), deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus), and raccoon (Procyon lotor). 3.4.2.5 Aquatic Species Project activities around streams frequently generate impacts distributed downstream from their point of origin. For this reason, impacts to lotic (moving water) systems must consider downstream effects to aquatic biota (plants and animals) and the habitat upon which they depend. This evaluation focuses on salmonid fish habitat within the Hylebos Creek Watershed as the principal indicator of aquatic habitat. Data on aquatic species other than fish (e.g., aquatic macroinvertebrates, shellfish) is lacking for the watershed in general and in the evaluation documentation supplied for this analysis. This lack of information on non -fish biota in the watershed creates uncertainty as to the true extent of potential impacts to aquatic habitat resulting from the proposed project. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-124 November 2003 Fish Information on fisheries resources in the Hylebos Creek Watershed is summarized from several generalized and ancillary sources as indicated in Appendix B. Results from the evaluated sources presented some uncertainty, as there is disagreement between sources with respect to species presence in the Hylebos Creek Watershed. Table 3.4-1, below, identifies salmonid species reported to be present in the watershed. Table 3.4-1. Salmonid Fish Species Identified as Present in the Hylebos Creek Watershed Species Evolutionarily Federal State (Scientific Name) Significant Unit Status Status Location in Watershed and Use* Chum salmon Puget Sound/ Not Not Listed Main stem Hylebos Creek = Migration (Oncorhynchus keta) Straight of Warranted West Branch — Spawning and Rearing Georgia for Listing ^Puget East Branch - Migration Chinook salmon Sound Threatened Candidate Main stem Hylebos Creek — Migration (O. tshawytscha) for Listing West Branch — Uncertaint East Branch — Undefined Coho salmon Puget Sound/ Candidate Not Listed Main stem Hylebos Creek — Migration (O. kisutch) Straight of for Listing West Branch — Spawning and Rearing Georgia Not Listed East Branch — Migration Main stem Hylebos Creek — Migration Winter steelhead Puget Sound Not (O. mykiss) Warranted West Branch — Migration for Listing Not — Not Listed East Branch — Migration Main stem Hylebos Creek — Cutthroat trout Not Applicable (O. clarki) Warranted Undefined' for Listing West Branch — Undefined I East Branch — Undefined$ Habitat use information was taken from StreamNet data query. Uncertain status indicates conflicting information presented in evaluation documentation. Undefined indicates insufficient information exists to make a determination on presence or use. Cutthroat trout present in Hylebos Creek are identified as resident runs (demes). No information on spawning and rearing habitat for cutthroat trout was contained within the evaluation documentation. Of these species listed in Table 3.4-1, the Puget Sound chinook salmon Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) is identified as a federally threatened and state candidate species, and the Puget Sound/Straight of Georgia coho salmon ESU is a federal candidate for listing. An ESU is a distinctive group of Pacific salmon, steelhead, or sea -run cutthroat trout, and forms the basic unit by which such groups are managed and evaluated with respect to the ESA. These species are addressed in greater detail in Appendix B. Fisheries information in the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species report received in February 2002 indicates chum salmon, coho salmon, winter steelhead, and resident cutthroat trout use portions of the Hylebos Creek Watershed. There is conflicting information regarding the presence of chinook salmon in the Hylebos Creek Watershed. The WDFW report makes no mention of chinook salmon use; however, the State of Hylebos: A Progress Report on Efforts to Protect and Restore Wild Salmon in Hylebos Creek (Friends of Hylebos Creek 2000) presents results from salmon watcher surveys conducted in 2000, which indicated chinook salmon use in the West Branch Hylebos Creek as far upstream as Brook Lake. Chinook and coho salmon are further identified as present in the lower reaches of the East and West branches in the ESA Listed Salmonids Checklist (Planning Division 1999) and the Responses to Salmonid Checklist (AlderNW 2002b), though there is no mention about how such determinations were made. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-125 November 2003 Further information is found in WDFW's A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization Volume 1 Puget Sound Region (1975), which lists only coho and chum salmon as present in the watershed. Data queries of StreamNet's resources, which are drawn from state and federal fisheries resource management agency databases, fail to show chinook salmon as a species present in the watershed. WDFW staff (Jackson 2002 personal communication) indicate that Hylebos Creek is not considered a classic chinook salmon -producing stream, and there is a high likelihood that chinook salmon observed in the system may be strays from the Puyallup Watershed. Jackson concludes that it is very likely that a chinook salmon run does not exist for Hylebos Creek, but individuals of the species occur infrequently, such as sightings in 1991 and 2001. Further, contact with Puyallup Tribal resource professionals (Ladley 2002 personal communication) creates substantial uncertainty, as Ladley indicates that Friends of Hylebos Creek salmon watcher surveyors have mistakenly identified coho salmon as chinook salmon. Ladley indicates that the Puyallup tribe has fisheries data on Hylebos Creek from 1978 to the present, and while small numbers of chinook are known to occur in the main stem, he is suspect of sightings in the West Branch because streamflows are generally too low during spawning season to allow fish passage. The presence, range, and distribution of chinook salmon in the Hylebos Creek Watershed is important for a number of reasons. First, chinook salmon are the only federally protected species potentially present in the watershed, which has implications for activities that could constitute "take" under the ESA. Second, impacts from the proposed project could have greater or lesser effects on the species, depending on where in the watershed chinook salmon occur and how the species uses habitat it is identified with. For the purposes of this evaluation, chinook salmon would be treated in the most conservative manner based on the information available, which is to say that chinook are assumed capable of reaching West Hylebos State Park in the West Branch Subbasin, as reported in the Friends of Hylebos Creek documentation. While this may be in error, it would allow for analysis and associated mitigating measures to provide the greatest protection of the species and the habitat it depends upon. There is no evidence to indicate that chinook salmon occur on the proposed project site or in Tributary 0014C. Fish Presence Main stem Hylebos Creek The main stem of Hylebos Creek is reported to contain runs of chum salmon, chinook salmon, coho salmon, and winter steelhead. Resident cutthroat trout are also reported to be present throughout the main stem system. Information on habitat use by these species indicates that the main stem serves largely as migration habitat for the salmon and steelhead runs identified. No information on cutthroat trout habitat use occurs in the evaluation documentation, though it is likely that resident cutthroat trout use migration, spawning, and rearing habitat throughout the main stem, where habitat conditions allow for such uses. West Branch Hylebos Creek The West Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin has identified runs of chum salmon, coho salmon, and winter steelhead (AlderNW 2002). Resident cutthroat trout are also reported to be present throughout the subbasin. Chinook salmon presence is discussed above. StreamNet (2002) data indicate that chum salmon are found downstream of the site in the West Branch Hylebos Creek from its confluence with the East Branch Hylebos Creek, upstream to where Tributary 0013A contributes its flow at about South 368th Street (see Figure 3.2-1). Chum salmon use this section of the West Branch primarily for spawning and rearing habitat (StreamNet 2002). WDFW Priority Habitats and Species data, reported in the AlderNW Sensitive Species Report (2002), indicate that chum salmon use habitat from just downstream of the South 348th Street road crossing. These data conflict Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-126 November 2003 with the StreamNet data, and extend the distribution of chum salmon approximately 1 mile further upstream from the StreamNet upstream distribution limit for this species. For purposes of analysis, this evaluation would assume the more conservative upstream fish distribution limit from StreamNet. There is no evidence to indicate that chum salmon are present on the proposed project site or in Tributary 0014C. Coho salmon and steelhead use the West Branch primarily for migration habitat; curiously, no associated upstream spawning and rearing habitat has been delineated (StreamNet 2002). These data are somewhat inconsistent, as anadromous fishes typically use migratory habitat to connect spawning and rearing habitat in the upper watershed with downstream estuary and pelagic habitat. Nevertheless, coho salmon and steelhead are reported to use habitat in Tributary 0013, just upstream of its confluence with Tributary 0013A, and in Tributary 0014 into West Hylebos State Park, but not as far north as South 348th Street (StreamNet 2002). There is no evidence to indicate that coho salmon or steelhead are present on the proposed project site or in Tributary 0014C. With respect to the resident cutthroat trout presence in Tributary 0014C on the proposed project site, an evaluation by Terra and Associates (2002) concludes that such presence is unlikely because of the design of the flow control structures associated with the Kitts Corner Wetland and Kitts Corner Regional Detention Facility, the culvert length under Pacific Highway South, and a lack of suitable spawning habitat. East Branch Hylebos Creek The East Branch Hylebos Creek Subbasin has identified runs of chum salmon, coho salmon, and winter steelhead (A1derNW 2002). Resident cutthroat trout are also reported present throughout the subbasin. Chinook salmon are not identified as present in the East Branch Watershed; however, this is largely because the sole data source indicating presence of chinook salmon in the West Branch Subbasin, the Friends of Hylebos Creek survey, conducted no monitoring for the species in the East Branch Subbasin (A1derNW 2002). Chum salmon use the downstream reaches of Tributary 0006 as migration habitat (StreamNet 2002). The upstream distribution limit for the species is located in the lower half of the ravine habitat, near the Pierce County and King County line (see Figure 3.2-2). Coho salmon use Tributaries 0006, 0015, 0016, and 0016A as migration habitat (StreamNet 2002). The upstream distribution limit for species is just downstream of the Enchanted Parkway South road crossing several miles south of this site. Steelhead use Tributaries 0006 and 0015 as migration habitat (StreamNet 2002). The upstream distribution limit for this species is on Tributary 0015, approximately '/2 mile downstream from the Enchanted Parkway South road crossing. Fish passage on the East Branch is not well documented. The Sensitive Species Report prepared for the applicant (A1derNW 2002) identifies a number of culvert crossings on Tributary 0016A that are considered upstream passage barriers and concludes that "[t]here is no record... of salmonid fish moving upstream beyond Enchanted Parkway in the East Branch... Past development in and adjacent to the creek has substantially degraded habitat and limits the potential for fish to move into the upper segments of either branch." While the Sensitive Species Report assumes that the culverts crossing under Enchanted Parkway South, I-5, and SR 18 present a fish passage barrier, that supposition has not been substantiated. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-127 November 2003 Historic data on coho salmon and steelhead use of Tributary 0016A is lacking, as this tributary was originally part of the West Branch Hylebos Subbasin prior to construction of I-5. There is insufficient detailed information on the number, design, and function of stormwater facilities constructed on the East Branch to demonstrate conclusively that anadromous fish species cannot access the upper reaches of Tributary 0016A on the site. However, given the fact that coho salmon and steelhead do not venture further upstream than West Hylebos State Park in the West Branch of Hylebos Creek, it is unlikely that such species would find conditions in the upper reaches of Tributary 0016A more suitable for upstream passage since its realignment into the East Branch Hylebos Watershed. Unfortunately, there is no evidence of a natural fish passage barrier in the East Branch Hylebos Creek or its tributaries, as uncertainty still exists as to the potential upstream range and distribution for salmonids in this system. It entirely likely that the presence of long culverted reaches in the East Branch limits the ability of fish to pass upstream and reach the project area, though best available science does not indicate that culvert length, in and of itself, constitutes a passage barrier. Designated Critical Habitat and Essential Fish Habitat The designation of critical habitat for listed species is required under Section 4(a)(3)(A) of the ESA. Critical habitat encompasses habitat elements required by aquatic species to survive, including the water, substrate, and adjacent riparian zone. Designated critical habitat for the Puget Sound chinook salmon ESU was withdrawn on April 30, 2002, by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, pending a reassessment by NOAA Fisheries; therefore, no critical habitat has been designated at this time. The Magnuson -Stevens Fisheries Conservation and Management Act (MSFCMA) requires the evaluation of proposed projects with a federal nexus to include impacts on habitat of commercially managed fish populations. Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) has been defined for the purposes of the MSFCMA as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity" (NOAA Fisheries 1999b). NOAA Fisheries has further added the following interpretations to clarify this definition: • "Waters" include aquatic areas and their associated physical, chemical, and biological properties that are used by fish, and may include areas historically used by fish where appropriate. • "Substrate" includes sediment, hard bottom, structures underlying the waters, and associated biological communities. • "Necessary" means the habitat required to support a sustainable fishery and the managed species' contribution to a healthy ecosystem. • "Spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity" covers the full life cycle of a species. NOAA Fisheries has recently proposed EFH for Pacific Coast salmon, including chinook and coho salmon, within Amendment 14 to the Pacific Coast Salmon Plan (NOAA Fisheries 2000). Any reasonable attempt to encourage the conservation of EFH must take into account actions outside of EFH, such as upstream and upslope activities that may have an adverse effect on EFH. For the purposes of this evaluation, the EFH is an indicator of potential impact, and not a regulatory requirement, given the lack of federal action. 3.4.3 Environmental Impacts 3.4.3.1 Impacts of the Proposed Alternative Existing conditions on the proposed site are 90 percent forested, 3 percent wetland, with the remaining 7 percent a mixture of impervious surfaces, pasture, and grass (see Figure 3.2-5). The proposal would Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-128 November 2003 convert this area into about 50 percent impervious surfaces and 50 percent pervious surfaces, including 18 percent sensitive areas and buffers, 22 percent landscaping and drainage facilities, and about 10 percent grassed playfield. Such land use conversion has substantial implications for terrestrial and aquatic habitat found on the project site and habitat connectivity in the vicinity of the proposed project. Impacts to terrestrial habitat would involve the loss of substantial wildlife habitat, as well as fragmentation and degradation of remaining habitat and surrounding habitat values. Impacts to aquatic habitat include potential downstream effects associated with modifications to stormwater runoff patterns, volume, timing, and contamination resulting from project development. Terrestrial Habitat Impacts Habitat Loss and Species Displacement The proposed plan calls for conversion of the existing site to more than 50 percent impervious surface area. Additionally, much of the pervious surface area associated with the proposed design is in the form of a grass athletic field and landscaping. Eighteen percent of the existing habitat would be conserved in the proposed design, including buffer areas surrounding the Kitts Corner Wetland and the East Branch Hylebos Creek. With the exception of these areas, all other terrestrial habitat would be cleared for development or retained as small landscape areas. The habitat loss associated with the proposed project has consequences for species on the site, as well as for species and habitat in the general region. Under the proposed design, the majority of habitat available on -site for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals would be lost. No mitigation to compensate for lost wildlife habitat acreage or functions is required for, or included in the proposed design, with the exception of wetland mitigation discussed in Section 3.3 Vegetation and Wetlands. The proposed landscaping for the developed site lacks the necessary functions and values species currently found on -site require to survive, much less thrive. As a result, one should expect the majority of species associated with habitat found on -site to be displaced or destroyed by the proposed action. It is expected that amphibians and small ground -dwelling mammals would be the most substantially impacted, given their limited mobility. For species able to leave the proposed site prior to ground clearing, the likely areas of egress include the forested fringe along South 336th Street, the East Branch Hylebos Creek buffer area, the Kitts Corner Wetland, and the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility on the west side of Pacific Highway South (although options for migration to the latter are very limited). In all cases, these areas may not provide sufficient habitat and cover to ensure the long-term survival of displaced species. The forested fringe along South 336th Street would be significantly affected by edge effects on both the north and south sides of the stand. While this area may provide some habitat connectivity between the East Hylebos Creek buffer area and the Kitts Corner Wetland area, this area is not likely to support many species in and of itself, as it would be severely degraded from its pre -site development condition. A number of factors are likely to further reduce the long-term survival of species displaced from the project site. First, with the exception of the forested corridor along South 336th Street, none of the likely sites in which species can immediately seek refuge from project -related disturbances constitute habitat similar to the mixed second -growth forest habitat that would be eliminated. Thus, species adapted to the mixed second -growth forest habitat type must travel further from the project site to find suitable habitat. Second -growth forest habitat is substantially fragmented throughout the subbasin, with few or no migration corridors to accommodate species movement between such habitat types. While the forested fringe along South 336th Street is considered mixed second -growth forest, the edge effect created by site development along its southern boundary would reduce overall habitat suitability and carrying capacity in the stand. Further, while the South 336th Street forested fringe would provide a corridor for species movement between the East Hylebos Creek buffer area and Kitts Corner Wetland, it would not directly connect the project site to other stands of mixed second -growth forest habitat in the region. Both I-5 to Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-129 November 2003 the east and Pacific Highway South to the west present substantial barriers to species movement from the project site. These highways also raise human safety concerns for vehicular traffic, as project -related disturbance would likely increase the number of animal crossings on surrounding roads and highways. The refuge provided by the East Branch Hylebos Creek buffer area, the Kitts Corner Wetland, and the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility sites are too small to accommodate any substantial increase in species occupation over the long term. Access to the South 336th Street Regional Detention Facility site is also limited by the need to cross intervening developed property and Pacific Highway South. As such, species moving into these areas would still need to find habitat further afield to survive. These areas already support numerous species adapted to conditions found in each specific habitat type. Any influx of species into these areas would likely increase inter -species and intra-species competition for the resources available in these habitats over the short term. Thus, increased pressure would force species from these refuge areas to seek more suitable habitat and areas with less competitive pressure. While the three sites identified may provide temporary refuge for some species, limited resources and competitive pressure would reduce the absolute number of species each site can support until a new equilibrium is reached. The most sensitive species that may be affected is the long-eared myotis, a bat species that roosts in coniferous forests such as that found on -site. The myotis could be affected by the elimination of roosting and rearing habitat and prey. Construction projects can affect bald eagles and other bird species by creating disturbance and/or by degrading their habitat (Bottorff et al. 1987; Anthony and Isaacs 1989). Foraging eagles can be affected by disturbance that may displace foraging birds to less preferred areas (Stalmaster and Newman 1979; Stalmaster 1980). Habitat degradation as a consequence of construction projects such as this may involve removal of perching, roosting, or foraging habitat. Though eagle usage of the project area may be extremely limited, the elimination of Wetland Area C and removal of perch habitat adjacent to the Kitts Corner Wetland would negatively affect eagles identified in the area by decreasing available forage habitat regionally. Of the species identified on -site, or potentially associated with the habitat found on -site, only a few species warrant state or federal protections or consideration (Table 3.4-2). The majority of these species are birds, and are thus likely to leave the project area at the onset of project -related disturbance. However, the long-term survival of these species is dependent upon access to alternative suitable habitat in the region. For species that are known on -site, such as the pileated woodpecker, the loss of foraging habitat found on the project site would constitute the further degradation and fragmentation of needed habitat within the region. In summary, site development would eliminate the majority of the terrestrial habitat found on -site. In particular, the mixed second -growth coniferous forest habitat type would be almost entirely eliminated. Impacts to species able to leave the project area at the onset of ground clearing are uncertain, given the general lack of alternative suitable habitat in the vicinity of the project and the barriers to migration. Less mobile species would likely be destroyed by site development activities. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-130 November 2003 Table 3.4-2. Species of Special Concern Species Status* Avians Great blue heron Bald eagle Vaux's swift Black swift Pileated woodpecker Mammals Pacific water shrew Long-eared myotis State Monitor Species State Threatened Species/Federal Threatened Species State Candidate Species State Monitor Species State Candidate Species State Monitor Species State Monitor Species/Federal Species of Concern Species list generated by AlderNW 2002; species status taken from WDFW 2002. Habitat Fragmentation Similar to habitat loss, habitat fragmentation addresses impacts over a larger geographic scale. Habitat fragmentation typically occurs when a portion of a particular habitat type is converted to another use and only isolated pockets of pre -conversion habitat remain. The impacts of habitat fragmentation tend to be species specific; however, some general impacts are known. Typically, habitat fragmentation leads to increased intra-species and inter -species competition for available resources, decreased breeding opportunity and success, depressed gene -flow within populations, and potential species extirpation through habitat degradation. Of particular concern is the fact that urban forest land is becoming scarce. The proposed project site cari be viewed as rare because of the presence of a large area of mixed second -growth forest habitat. Without a comprehensive analysis of existing habitat within the basin, a quantitative evaluation of impacts resulting from project site habitat loss cannot be made. However, it is clear the loss of habitat associated with the project site, in particular the mixed second -growth forest habitat type, would result in further habitat fragmentation within the basin. Aquatic Habitat Impacts Hydrologic Regime Change The proposed project would disrupt much of the natural dynamic on -site. With the exception of the grass athletic field, little stormwater would infiltrate under the proposed design. As a result, subsurface groundwater flow would no longer be present to aid in stormwater attenuation, contribute to stream baseflow, and nourish wetland and riparian zone vegetation. The proposed design could result in changes to vegetative communities surrounding watercourses and wetlands, which can influence stream nutrient dynamics and stream temperature via riparian canopy shade. Further, stream segments may become dewatered earlier or more frequently than under existing conditions, impacting aquatic biota in the project area, as well as downstream. By collecting stormwater on impervious surfaces and channeling accumulated storm volume to detention ponds, the proposed design would result in the site collecting greater stormwater volumes. The proposed stormwater design raises several concerns discussed in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality), which have potential consequences for aquatic habitat on -site and downstream. Under a pre - Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-131 November 2003 existing agreement between the prior landowner and the City of Federal Way, stormwater from the western subcatchments would discharge to the Kitts Corner Wetland. As a result of the agreement, no hydraulic analysis has been conducted on the volumes of stormwater likely to be discharged, or the effect of such stormwater contribution on the efficiency and functioning of the Kitts Corner Wetland and downstream water quality facilities. It should be noted that the Kitts Corner Wetland detention facility was designed with future growth in the subcatchment taken into consideration. However, as no hydraulic analysis was conducted for site -specific development analysis, there is uncertainty as to the potential impacts associated with stormwater management for stormflow originating on the western side of the project site. Should stormwater contributions exceed design criteria for the Kitts Corner Wetland, it is possible that pollutants could be transported downstream. Additionally, increased stormwater contribution could change wetland vegetation in the Kitts Corner Wetland, which could impair its functioning. Finally, stormwater contribution in excess of facility design could cause downstream erosion resulting from inadequate detention time. With respect to stormwater design for the Eastern Subcatchment, it is assumed that the conveyance capacity of Tributary 0016A would not be exceeded by discharge from stormwater detention facilities incorporated in project plans. However, the proposed stormwater detention facilities are designed to provide Level 1 flow control under current KCSWDM requirements. This level of flow control is intended to reduce peak flows, maintain conveyance capacity, and prevent flooding. It is not intended to provide protection against flows of smaller intensity but greater duration, which are the most common cause of erosion and sedimentation in streams. As discussed in Section 3.2.4.1, this may be mitigated by additional flow control measures. A further concern associated with the proposed stormwater design is the use of level spreaders to discharge stormwater from detention ponds to receiving waters. Concentrated discharge is often generated at the spreader's low point, resulting in erosion downslope of the point of discharge (King County 1998). Erosion and Sedimentation Most of the natural channels in the Hylebos Basin have been heavily impacted by high flows and show evidence of abundant introduction of fine sediment as discussed above (King County 1991). The Basin Plan cites the flume -like nature of many channel reaches, where the hydraulic and biological diversity provided by pools, bars, and large debris has largely been stripped away. As a result, channel erosion, neighboring hillside erosion, and downstream deposition of channel- and culvert -clogging sediment are much higher than under natural conditions. In describing the condition of Tributary 0016A on the east side of the site, the Sensitive Species Report (2002) indicates that a retaining wall abutting the stream, just downstream of the project site, has failed due to erosive forces. While the Kitts Corner Wetland and other facilities were constructed to address flooding and erosion on the West Branch, no such water facility exists on Tributary 0016A in the East Branch. Fine sediment clogs streambed substrate, degrades aquatic habitat, and transfers upland pollutants into and through the stream system. There are two principal mechanisms by which the proposed project may contribute fine sediments to streams. The first is the sediment associated with stream channel erosion or erosion from failure of the level spreader. The second mechanism is associated with short-term construction -related ground disturbance and stockpiling of cut and fill material. At issue are the effects of fine sediment on adult and juvenile salmonids. Urbanization and construction contribute periodic pulses or chronic levels of suspended sediments in streams (Bash et al. 2001). Suspended sediment is associated with negative effects on spawning, growth, and reproduction of salmonids. Effects on salmonids would differ based on their developmental stage. Suspended sediments may affect salmonids by altering their physiology, behavior, and habitat, all of which may lead to physiological stress and reduced survival rates (Bash et al. 2001). Fine sediments and turbidity have the Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-132 November 2003 potential to reduce light transmission and, if chronic, suppress primary production at some level. Salmonids could be affected due to loss of suitable spawning habitat resulting from sediment infiltration. Water Quality Contaminants Water quality related to toxic metals and organics contamination is another impact associated with urban development. Increased impervious surface area aids in the collection and transport of such contaminants to the aquatic environment. Toxic pollutants commonly found in urban runoff include trace metals such as lead, copper, zinc, and organic compounds, including oils, grease, phthalates, and chlorinated hydrocarbons (Richter 1999). Sources of toxics include the breakdown of metal products, vehicle fuels and fluids, vehicle wear, industrial processes, and the use of industrial and household chemicals such as paints, preservatives, and pesticides. Such contaminants can negatively affect fish physiology, behavior, and habitat. The effects of trace metals and organic compounds may be highly toxic to aquatic organisms and can bioaccumulate in fish and shellfish. Sources of nutrients such as nitrates and phosphates include chemical fertilizers applied to landscaped areas, lawns, and gardens; failed septic systems; soil erosion; and atmospheric deposition. Excessive nutrients in urban runoff can stimulate algal growth and cause nuisance algal blooms. Urban runoff may also contain high levels of organic matter that can lead to depleted oxygen levels in water and sediment when it decomposes. This in turn may cause excessive odors and fish kills in receiving waters (Richter 1999). Temperature Because stormwater detention ponds frequently have more surface area exposed directly to solar radiation, compared with riparian corridors or subsurface flows, such ponds often have a negative impact on downstream water temperatures. Further, constructed water quality ponds often lack shade -producing vegetation, as would be found in naturalponds or wetlands with standing water. Additionally, water collected from impervious surface areas can enter detention ponds much warmer than under natural conditions. In particular, water from landscaping irrigation frequently flows over sun -warmed asphalt and concrete before draining into a detention pond. As a result, warmer water discharged from water quality ponds during summer months can affect aquatic biota at the point of discharge and degrade water quality downstream by raising stream temperatures to suboptimal levels. Salmonids require cool, well -oxygenated water to survive. The maximum temperature that salmonids can tolerate varies with species, lifestage (e.g., fry, fingerling, or adult), prior acclimation, oxygen availability, duration of warmer temperature, and the presence of pollutants. Given the opportunity, juvenile and adult salmon would occupy water that is 13° to 18°C (55° to 64°F), with the warmer water selected only if excess food is available. Water temperatures of approximately 23° to 25°C (73° to 77°F) are lethal to salmon and steelhead, and genetic abnormalities or mortality of salmonid eggs can occur above 11°C (52°F) (DOE 2000). Increased water temperatures can affect feeding rates and feeding success in salmonids, as well as generally increasing metabolic stress in individuals and rendering habitat uninhabitable. Temperature data were collected in 2002 at three locations in the West Hylebos Creek Subbasin, downstream of the proposed project development. Afternoon water temperatures recorded closest to the project area (at 36605 Pacific Highway South) reached 15°C in mid -July, and remained elevated through most of August and into September. (Smith 2003). While temperature data collected closer to the project area is lower than data collected further downstream, the data illustrate that water temperature in West Hylebos Creek can reach suboptimal levels for salmonids. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-133 November 2003 Puget Sound ESU chinook salmon are listed as threatened under the ESA and begin entering the Hylebos Creek Basin in August. Puget Sound/Straight of Georgia ESU coho salmon are a candidate for listing under the ESA, and enter the Hylebos Creek Basin in September. While neither of these species is present in streams crossing the project site, downstream water temperatures are directly related to upstream habitat conditions. For this reason, measures to reduce thermal load in surface water runoff and from water collected in stormwater treatment facilities are necessary to protect or maintain properly functioning conditions in the Hylebos Creek Watershed. 3.4.3.2 Impacts of the No-Action/Proposed Business Park Alternative For the purposes of this evaluation, it is assumed that the business park alternative would occupy the same area as the proposed Christian Faith Center alternative. The main difference between the two alternatives is the amount of impervious surface area incorporated into each design. Terrestrial habitat impacts are assumed to be nearly identical, as both alternatives would convert the majority of the site from mixed second -growth forest habitat to impervious surface area. The business park alternative would create more impervious surface area than the proposed alternative, as the athletic field associated with the Christian Faith Center would be used to site additional buildings, parking, and required landscaping. The business park alternative would have a greater impact on groundwater infiltration, as the athletic field associated with the Christian Faith Center design would be replaced with buildings, parking, and landscaping. The 'consequences of decreased infiltration would be similar to those detailed in Section 3.2.3; specifically, disrupted groundwater infiltration would affect stormwater attenuation, stream baseflows, and riparian and wetland vegetative communities. These effects would occur to a greater extent on the East Branch, to which the current athletic field drains. It is also possible that the business park alternative would have a slightly greater impact on stream temperature, as there would be more building roof area, asphalt, and concrete for stormwater to absorb heat from prior to draining to a detention pond. The consequences of such a slight temperature increase are negligible but likely. Assuming similar levels of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) between the two alternatives, there should be no greater risk of construction -related fugitive sediment transport associated with the business park alternative, compared with the proposed alternative. 3.4.4 Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 3.4.4.1 Terrestrial Impacts Secondary terrestrial impacts are largely related to species displacement resulting from the conversion of most of the mixed second -growth forest habitat on -site to impervious surface area. Species displaced by project construction would likely move into areas already supporting numerous species adapted to conditions found in each specific habitat type. Any influx of species into these areas would likely increase inter -species and intra-species competition for the resources available in these habitats over the short term. Such conditions of increased competition would likely result in additional dispersion of species or die -off until a new equilibrium is achieved. Cumulative terrestrial impacts associated with the proposed project involve habitat fragmentation within the larger region. Typically, habitat fragmentation leads to increased intra-species and inter -species competition for available resources, decreased breeding opportunity and success, depressed gene flow within populations, and potential species extirpation through habitat degradation. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-134 November 2003 3.4.4.2 Aquatic Impacts Secondary aquatic impacts are focused primarily on stormwater infiltration, stream sedimentation, stream erosion, and stream temperature. Disruption of stormwater infiltration, resulting from conversion of pervious surface area to impervious surface area, can negatively affect aquatic communities by attenuating stormflow, changing baseflow contribution to streams, and changing riparian and wetland vegetative communities. Increased stormwater discharge can lead to stream erosion, which is a substantial source of sedimentation. Additionally, stream erosion can scour away riparian habitat features required by biota. The possibility of increased stream sedimentation is perhaps the most substantial impact on downstream fish habitat, as sediments clog substrate used by salmonids for rearing. Increased impervious surface area and large, unshaded detention ponds have the potential to increase stream temperatures during summer months. The impacts of high stream temperatures can render entire reaches unsuitable for stenotypic cold -water species such as salmonids. Cumulative aquatic impacts largely involve continuing development within the Hylebos Creek Basin. As the remaining undeveloped, pervious land within the basin is converted into impervious surface area, the effects of stormwater runoff would become more pronounced. In the absence of stormwater management designed to emulate more natural, pre -development streamflows, issues like sedimentation, erosion, exaggerated hydrology, and stream temperature would continue to degrade aquatic habitat. 3.4.5 Mitigating Measures Mitigating measures are those designs, practices, and actions designed to limit, reduce, or compensate for impacts anticipated to be associated with a project. 3.4.5.1 Mitigating Measures for Terrestrial Habitat Impacts Given the severity of anticipated impacts to terrestrial habitat, there are few mitigating measures that would have appreciable effect. Still, several features to limit impacts have been incorporated in the proposal: ■ Maintenance of native vegetation and ground cover vegetation within the forested buffer zone along the northern property boundary. • Maintenance of a fringe of mixed second -growth forest habitat type as a buffer around identified sensitive habitats (i.e., East Hylebos Creek riparian zone, Kitts Corner Wetland). Other potential mitigating measures for retention of vegetation and wetlands are contained in Sections 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality) and 3.3 (Vegetation and Wetlands). Specific mitigation for wildlife may include: • Begin ground clearing activity from the west side of the property, allowing animals to move east into the buffer zone adjacent to the East Branch of Hylebos Creek. • Time construction to avoid nesting season (i.e., late winter through early summer) for the majority of avian species. • Augment project landscaping plans to provide retention and enhancement of wildlife species through collaboration with a habitat biologist review to incorporate specific measures including but not limited to tree retention, protection and enhancement measures, and habitat -sensitive plantings and structures such as snags, within wetland and stream areas. • Enhance connections with existing open space and habitat east of I-5 by enhancing the 336th Street underpass. Although space is limited, and the roadway and associated traffic is a Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-135 November 2003 disturbance, providing additional vegetation cover along the side slopes above the road could provide cover sufficient to facilitate movement by terrestrial species. + Place notification signs on Pacific Highway South, South 336th Street, South 341st Street, and I-5 informing motorists about the increased potential for animals crossing these roadways. In order for warning signs to be effective in the long term, the signs must be reinforced by observing the condition being warned of. Unless a reasonable number of animals are sighted using the crossing, signage is unlikely to be effective. As stated, none of the proposed mitigating measures would compensate for habitat destroyed by the proposed project; however, some of the measures may increase the chance of survival for wildlife displaced by project construction. 3.4.5.2 Mitigating Measures for Aquatic Habitat Impacts A number of mitigating measures identified in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, and Water Quality) would reduce impacts on water temperature, water quality, and streamflows that may lead to channel erosion. • Minimize impervious surface area or the effects of impervious surface area through any combination of the following: infiltration of rooftop stormwater discharge, use of green roof construction, use of permeable surfaces for parking areas, increased number of more mature trees in parking area landscaping to intercept precipitation, and reduced parking area through use of a multi -level garage or rooftop parking. ■ Use a greater number of smaller water quality facilities along the east side of the site (along the East Branch of Hylebos Creek) to emulate more natural infiltration and groundwater influences on the riparian area. • Ensure water quality facilities comply with Level 2 flow control requirements to reduce the risk of erosion and sediment transport. + Replace detention pond level spreader discharge designs for flow dispersion/infiltration trenches. Additional mitigating measures include: + Use of larger trees in landscaping around detention ponds to reduce water temperature. + Routine maintenance of landscape irrigation systems to protect against over -watering and mis- application of water to reduce warm -water inputs to detention ponds. • Early morning use of irrigation watering during summer months. • Use of native vegetation in landscaping to reduce the need for irrigation watering and fertilizer supplements. 3.4.5.3 Mitigating Measures for General Construction Impacts Mitigating measures consisting of erosion and sediment control BMPs are detailed in Section 3.2 (Waterways, Hydrology, Floodplains, and Water Quality) and would contribute to mitigation of impacts on aquatic species. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-136 November 2003 3.4.6 Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impacts 3.4.6.1 Terrestrial Impacts Terrestrial habitat loss constitutes the single largest significant unavoidable adverse impact associated with the proposed development of the site. Under the proposed design, the majority of habitat available on -site for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals would be lost. No mitigation to compensate for lost wildlife habitat acreage or functions is required for, or included in, the proposed design, with the exception of wetland mitigation discussed in Section 3.3 (Vegetation and Wetlands). The proposed landscaping for the developed site lacks the necessary functions and values that species currently found on -site require to survive. As a result, one should expect the majority of species associated with habitat found on -site to be displaced or destroyed by the proposed action. Short-term unavoidable adverse impacts associated with site construction involve the temporary disturbance of species located in the vicinity of site construction. Noise, vibration, and dust resulting from construction activities can lead to disruption in foraging, rearing, and nesting behavior and displacement of species to suboptimal habitat types. Seasonal and daily restrictions on the construction activities with high noise levels may aid in mitigating disturbance -related impacts. 3.4.6.2 Aquatic Impacts The conversion of this undeveloped parcel to urban use would result in loss of a variety of natural functions that cannot be fully mitigated by detention, water quality treatment, or other facilities. This would alter the flow and other characteristics of the stream systems. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 3-137 November 2003 AHBL. 2002. Technical Information Report for the Christian Faith Center, Federal Way, Washington. Prepared for the Abbey Road Group, LLC, by AHBL, Inc., Tacoma, WA. May 2002. Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory (G.D. Williams, R.M. Thom, D. Woodruff, A. Borde, A. Skillman, M. Miller, R. Kropp, S. Blanton), Pentec Environmental (J. Starkes, J. Houghton), Striplin Environmental Associates, Shapiro Associates, King County DNR (L. Blackmore, J. Brennan). In Review (2001). State of the nearshore ecosystem: Central Puget Sound including Vashon and Maury Islands (WRIAs 8 and 9). Prepared for King County Department of Natural Resources, Seattle, Washington. 266 pp. Bolton, S. and J. Shellberg. 2001. Ecological issues in floodplains and riparian corridors. University of Washington, Center for Streamside Studies. Booth, D.B. 1991. Urbanization and the natural drainage system - Impacts, solutions and prognoses. The Northwest Environmental Journal 7:93-118. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Booth, D.B. 2000. Forest cover, impervious -surface area, and the mitigation of urbanization impacts in King County, Washington. King County Water and Land Resources Division, Seattle, Washington. Brinson, M.M. 1993. A hydrogeomorphic classification of wetlands. Technical Report WRP-DE-4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. CH2M Hill. 1994a. WH08, WH10, and WH11 Regional Drainage Analysis and WH08-CIPOI Project Predesign Report. Prepared for the City of Federal Way by CH2M Hill, Bellevue, WA. December 1994. CH2M Hill. 1994b. Contract 93-284—WHO8, 10, 11 Regional Drainage Analysis Tasks 1.1.2 and 1.2.2 Technical Memorandum, Hydrologic and Hydraulic Modeling Evaluation. CH2M Hill, Bellevue, WA. March 1994. Chattin, B.T. 2001. Pervious pavement, salmon listing requires new stormwater management strategy. Washington Aggregates and Concrete Association. Available at: http:l/www.washingtonconcrete.or indust[y/i3ervious—pavement.htm. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. Earth Consultants. 1999. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Christian Faith Center, South 336`h Street, and Interstate Highway S, Federal Way, Washington. Prepared for Christian Faith Center by Earth Consultants, Inc., Bellevue, WA. September 1999. Earth Consultants. 2002. Geotechnical Engineering Study, Christian Faith Center, South 336`h Street, and Interstate Highway S, Federal Way, Washington. Prepared for Christian Faith Center by Earth Consultants, Inc., Bellevue, WA. April 2002. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). 1997. Washington State wetland identification and delineation manual. Publication #96-94. Olympia, Washington. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 4-1 November 2003 Ecology. 2001. Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Publication Numbers 99-11 through 99-15. Washington State Department of Ecology, Water Quality Program, Olympia, WA. August 2001. Ecology. 2002. The 303(d) List of Impaired and Threatened Waterbodies. iittp:llwww.ecy.wa.&ov/programs/wg/303d/index.htmi, last updated August, 2002, accessed on December 4, 2002. Washington State Department of Ecology, Water Quality Program. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual. Technical Report Y- 87-1. Environmental Laboratory, Department of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Federal Way. 1999. City of Federal Way Addendum to King County Surface Water Design Manual. City of Federal Way, Federal Way, WA. April 1999. Federal Way. 2001. City of Federal Way Water Quality Applications Map. City of Federal Way, GIS Division, Federal Way, WA. June 2001. FEMA. 1995. Flood Insurance Rate Map for King County, Washington, and Incorporated Area. Panel 1250 of 1725. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. May 1995. Ferguson, B.K. 1998. Introduction to Stormwater: Concept, Purpose, Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. King County. 1991. Executive Proposed Basin Plan for Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound. King County. Surface Water Management Division, Seattle, WA. July 1991. King County. 1998. Surface Water Design Manual. King County, Department of Natural Resources, Seattle, WA. September 1998. King County. 2002. East Hylebos Creek 2001 Monitoring Program, Final Report. King County, Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Water and Land Resource Division, Seattle, WA. July 2002. Ludwa, K. and K.O. Richter. 2000. Emergent macroinvertebrate communities in relation to watershed development. Chapter 11 in: Wetlands and Urbanization, Implications for the future. Azous and Horner Eds. Lewis Publishers, New York. MRSC. Chapter 173-201A WAC, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington. htty.Hwww.nirsc.or,--/mc/ toclwac.htm, last updated November 18, 1997, accessed on December 4, 2002. Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington. 4 Omar, Amjad 2003 personal communication, September 11, 2003, Washington State Department of Transportation Project Design Office, 253.437.9748 Reimold, R.J. 1994. Wetland functions and values. Chapter 4 in Applied Wetlands Science and Technology. D. Kent. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida. Reinelt, L.E. and B.L. Taylor. 2000. Effect of watershed development on Hydrology. Chapter 8 in: Wetlands and urbanization, implications for the future. Azous and Horner Eds. Lewis Publishers, New York. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 4-2 November 2003 Reppert, R.T., W. Sitleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. D. Meyers. 1979. Wetlands values: Concepts and methods for wetlands evaluation. Research Report 79-R1. Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Bevoir, Virginia. Throop, John R 1999, If You Build It, Will They Come? Advice from church consultants on the relationship between building and congregational growth, Christianity Today International/Your Church Magazine. January/February 2000, Vol. 46, No. 1, Page 5 http://www.christianitytoday.com/yc/2000/001/7.54.html USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1993. Natural Wetlands and Urban Stormwater: Potential Impacts and Management. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. Williams, G.D. and R.M. Thom. 2001. Development of guidelines for aquatic habitat protection and restoration: Marine and estuarine shoreline modification issues. PNWD-3087. Prepared for the Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Washington Department of Ecology, by Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory, Sequim, Washington. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement 4-3 November 2003 APPENDIX A Determination of Scope of Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX A Determination of Scope of Environmental Impact Statement City of Federal Way Christian Faith Center File Nos: 02-102272-00-SE (Related File 02-10227 1 -00-UP) September 16, 2002 The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for this project is being prepared to meet procedural and substantive requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) WAC 197-11-500 and Federal Way City Code 18-99. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE An initial Determination of Significance and Request for Comments on the Scope of the EIS was issued by the City of Federal Way on August 10, 2002. A public scoping meeting was held on Tuesday, August 27, 2002. The scoping period ended on September 2, 2002. The purpose of the scoping process is to ensure that the public, cooperating agencies, and other agencies with expertise over elements of the environment or permit jurisdiction have input to assure complete and timely analysis of environmental issues. Copies of all comments received are available in the project file at the City of Federal Way, Department of Community Development. PROPOSAL The Christian Faith Center proposes a campus development of a church and school on a 46.58-acre site south of South 336ffi Street between Highway 99 and Interstate 5 in the City of Federal Way. The proposal consists of a 218,613 square foot, 2-story, 4,500 seat capacity church sanctuary and school auditorium and a 101,526 square foot, 2-story school. The proposal includes 1,178 parking spaces for the church/auditorium and 470 parking spaces for the school, 4.3 acres of recreation and play fields, extension of 20ffi Avenue South, through the site from South 336`h Street to South 3415t Place, landscaping, drainage and other utility facilities. ALTERNATIVES The development of alternatives is one of the key steps in both project development and the environmental process. No comments specific to the alternatives to be discussed were received during the scoping process. Two alternatives would be analyzed in the EIS: 1. The current proposal of the applicant; 2. The No -Action Alternative which would consist of two scenarios: a. The No-Action/No Development Scenario consisting of no development of the site, to establish a baseline comparison with the development alternative; and Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement A-1 November 2003 b. The No-Action/Alternative Development Scenario consisting of development of a business park under existing BP zoning. This scenario presumes that the proposed church development does not proceed and an alternative development allowed by current zoning occurs on the site. The extent of analysis of this scenario in each element would provide a comparison of the scale of impacts compared to the impacts of the proposal. ELEMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENT I. The EIS would address the following elements of the environment: Transportation All comments received addressed this element as a needed area of analysis. Comments generally focused on perceptions of the extent to which existing transportation facilities are congested at present and in the future and the adverse anticipated impacts of trips generated by the proposal. A number of comments focused specifically on impacts to the residential area north of the site, and more specifically on 20`h Ave South. No continents were received which addressed specific methodologies to be pursued. One comment was received from King Co./Metro regarding transit service and bus stops. Transportation analysis would be performed in accordance with City of Federal Way Code Section 22- 1475 authorizing the identification of transportation impacts and identification of appropriate mitigating measures and requirements for disclosure of environmental impacts by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Analysis would include time periods in which the proposed church and school may have adverse impacts. The relevant time periods have been preliminarily identified as: ■ Weekday AM peak of the street system • Weekday PM school peak, ■ Weekday PM late afternoon peak of the street system, • Sunday between services, • Sunday after services. Analysis would address movement and circulation of people or goods through system analysis including measurement of level of service and delay; access management and alternatives; traffic hazards including accidents and safety; pedestrian facility design; transit; and parking, including potential parking spillover. A particular focus would be on impacts to the residential area to the north of the site, including impacts and mitigating measures to address cut -through traffic. This would involve evaluation of the effectiveness of existing traffic calming facilities such as speed bumps, and evaluation of other potential mitigating measures. Environmentally Sensitive Areas, Including: Streams Six commenters checked this item as a needed area of analysis. Only the US Fish and Wildlife Service submitted a specific comment that addressed streams tangentially as related to species listed under the Endangered Species Act). The EIS would include analysis of existing streams and other waterways, hydrology, floodplains, and water quality, impacts of the proposal and potential mitigating measures. This analysis would provide a Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement A-2 November 2003 basis for analysis of impacts on wildlife, aquatic resources, and endangered species and provide a qualitative evaluation of proposed options for enhancing the existing Hylebos Creek on and adjacent to the project site Wetlands Six commenters checked this item as an important issue. The US Fish and Wildlife Service comment is relevant to wetlands to the extent they relate to species listed under the Endangered Species Act. The proposed church and school proposes to displace a 3,260 SF wetland, and could affect adjacent wetlands. Terrestrial and wetland vegetation would be identified and described; wetland boundaries would be confirmed; impacts would be assessed, including: displacement; degradation of wetland function; hydrologic impacts related to changes in stormwater volumes or water quality; and indirect impacts including noise and artificial light that could reduce habitat suitability for wildlife. Mitigation would include identifying potential opportunities to avoid, minimize, and compensate for impacts of the project, including restoration and enhancement of wetland and buffer areas and other measures. Fish & Wildlife Habitat Five commenters checked this item as an important issue. One commenter mentioned wildlife in reference wildlife use of the site. The US Fish and Wildlife Service comment related to species listed under the Endangered Species Act. Fish and wildlife species potentially affected by the project would be identified along with any potential suitable habitat, critical habitat, or essential fish habitat (EFH) within the project impact area. Impacts may include: displacement of habitat and habitat fragmentation; direct effects on wildlife from construction or operation, such as noise disturbance or other disruption of habitat areas; interference to critical life functions; effects on migration or dispersal; and impacts on reproduction, rearing and other lifecycle stages. Mitigation concepts would address the specific impacts identified and be coordinated with existing basin plans for enhancement of currently altered or channelized portions of Hylebos Creek. II. The following elements in WAC 197-11-444 are excluded from the scope of the EIS as elements for which probable significant adverse impacts are not likely to occur; and the impacts associated with these elements are appropriately addressed through City of Federal Way adopted codes, policies, and development regulations and standards. Earth (Geology, Soils, Topography, Unique Physical Features, Erosion/Accretion) One commenter checked soils and erosion but no specific impacts were identified. The earth related impacts of the proposal are likely to be small to moderate. The site is flat. There are no soil types or geological units that impose significant limitations. Impacts are likely to be controlled through normal clearing and grading conditions and best management practices (BMPs). The potential impacts of erosion and sedimentation would be addressed as part of water quality impacts on streams and wetlands. Air (Air Quality, Odor, Climate) No comments were received on this element. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement A-3 November 2003 This element would not be addressed. The church and school use are not likely to produce odors or other emissions. Air quality impacts of traffic from the church would be a very small and insignificant contribution to regional air quality. This is especially the case for this site which is between SR 99 and Interstate 5, both of which are significant regional transportation corridors and major sources of vehicular air pollution. It is presumed that regional air quality modeling as part of the Puget Sound Regional Council transportation plan and conforming transportation improvements program (TIP) establishes compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and that project traffic would not exceed the assumptions of regional vehicular emissions. Energy and Natural Resources (Amount required, Source/Availability, Nonrenewable resources, Conservation, Scenic resources) No comments were received on this element. Energy and natural resource use by the church and school are not likely to be significant, and are unlikely to be greatly different than Business Park or other development of the site. Environmental Health (Noise, Risk of Explosion, Releases of toxic or hazardous materials) Six commenters checked noise as an impact and five specific comments addressed potential noise impacts from traffic on I-5 and local arterials. A study was submitted by the applicant that includes monitoring of existing sound levels and projection of future noise levels. Noise levels from general traffic growth in the area approach 3dbA, which is the level at which changes in sound levels become generally noticeable by most people. Noise levels to not increase above the level of 67 dbA which is established by the Federal Highway Administration as the level at which noise mitigation of traffic noise impacts is typically employed. Noise level increases do not approach 10 dbA, which is the level that the Washington State Dept. of Transportation defines as a significant increase in traffic noise levels. The project addition to noise is minor compared to the noise increase from regional traffic growth and does not meet standards to be considered a significant increase. Land and Shoreline Use Three comments were received that addressed land use impacts. Two recommended discussion of impacts on adjacent residential areas and the loss of a large parcel of Business Park -zoned property with related impacts on city Comprehensive Plan goals for jobs and business. One comment suggested that land use impacts do not need to be addressed. Impacts associated with the change in Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations from the existing Business Park (BP) to Multifamily Residential as proposed, were analyzed with the City'previous environmental review of the proposed 2001 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (June 2001) and determined not to be significant. The analysis noted consistency of the proposed rezone with Comprehensive Plan policies related to regional demand forecasts for residential, commercial and industrial uses; and household and employment forecasts. Based on historical development trends the environmental analysis anticipated no significant adverse impact to the BP -zoned land supply in relationship to demand, or other significant adverse impact to housing or employment, as a result of the rezone. In addition, the use as a church is likely to be more compatible with residential uses to the north than warehouse or other uses currently allowed in the BP zone due to less visual impacts (as discussed below), noise impacts (see discussion above) and less floor area on the site. For these reasons, the Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement A-4 November 2003 previous environmental review for the comprehensive plan change and rezone appropriately addressed impacts to land use associated with the proposal. Aesthetics, Light & Glare, Historic and Cultural Preservation Comments on aesthetics related to the existing vegetated character of the site and the height of the proposed sanctuary. Aesthetics impacts would be principally related to height and bulk of proposed buildings and visual impacts of parking lots and recreation fields. The existing undeveloped status and visual quality of the site is presumed to be replaced by a development which would be allowed under existing Federal Way Comprehensive Plan policies and land use regulations. Therefore, impacts must be evaluated from the perspective of the differences between a development type which would be presumed under existing Business Park (BP) zoning, and the church and school development under the Multifamily Residential (RM) zoning, as proposed by the applicant. Regardless of how the site develops, the City's adopted height standards, landscaping, and architectural design guidelines are expected to sufficiently mitigate project -related aesthetic impacts. In addition, aesthetic impacts to the BP zoned area to the south are expected to be negligible because of existing industrial uses, BP zoning, and building character. View impacts to SR 99 would be limited by the existing screening of mature trees in the wetland/storm pond parcel on the westerly portion of the site. View impacts to I-5 would also be minimal due to existing screening by mature vegetation in the wetland and stream corridor along the eastern boundary of .the site. Therefore, an aesthetics analysis would appropriately focus more on impacts to the north of the site, including residential areas and South 336"'. The existing zoning would allow industrial and warehouse buildings of considerable size and bulk separated from property lines and streets only by a 25-35 foot building setback. Parking areas might be developed between the street and buildings and/or interior to the site. However, if parking and driving areas are situated as far as possible from residential zones, as encouraged by code, this may conceal some parking and traffic circulation, but could also result in the "backs" of multiple large scale industrial or warehouse buildings located adjacent and visible to South 336`t' Street and residential areas to the north. By contrast, under the proposed RM zoning and master plan, the height, bulk and scale of the proposed church and school are likely to be comparatively less of an impact on the residential area to the north, because of additional code -based design standards which apply to churches in residential zones, and because building setbacks from South 336`h Street, as proposed, would significantly exceed minimum setback requirements. Light and glare impacts from buildings and parking lot lighting, regardless of the development, would be similar to those in any urban setting and would be appropriately mitigated through existing code requirements pertaining to off -site glare, interior parking lot landscaping, and perimeter buffer requirements. Consequently, the City does not anticipate any significant, adverse impacts to aesthetics, or light, and glare, as a result of the proposed church and school development, beyond those which would appropriately be addressed by existing codes and/or site conditions, with no further mitigation required. In addition, there are no known historic or cultural resources on the undeveloped site. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement A-5 November 2003 Public Services and Utilities — Fire, Police, Schools, Parks an Recreation Comments on public services and utilities were received only from the applicant's representative who pointed out the commitments for availability of utilities and the slight impacts on public services. The demands on public services are unlikely to be significant. Churches have little impact on police service. Impacts on fire protection would be mitigated by Fire Code construction requirements for public assembly buildings. Park and recreation impacts would largely met on -site. Water, Sewer, and energy utility facilities are available to the site with little required increase in capacity which would significantly affect the utility provider. Stormwater service would be analyzed in terms of impacts on streams and other water -related resources. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement A-6 November 2003 APPENDIX B Wildlife, Fish, and Endangered Species: Relevant Species Documentation let» ►III ►:4:I Wildlife, Fish, and Endangered Species: Relevant Species Documentation Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Bald eagles were first protected by the Bald Eagle Protection Act of 1940 (16 U.S.C. 688-688d) and later listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The State of Washington has also crafted the Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Rules (WAC 232-12-292) to better protect this species locally. In 1978, the bald eagle was reclassified as threatened in five states, including Washington. Once numbering between 250,000 and 500,000 in the continental U.S., human development and the use of the pesticide DDT reduced the population to a low of about 400 pairs by the early 1960s. With the banning of DDT in 1972, and a number of subsequent recovery efforts, the continental U.S. population of bald eagles has since made a dramatic recovery, and by 1998, breeding pairs numbered approximately 6,000. Because of this recovery, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has proposed that the bald eagle be de -listed (USFWS 1999). A final ruling may occur in 2003. Recovery has been dramatic in Washington State, where there are now over 600 nesting pairs. Washington State also supports the largest wintering population of bald eagles in the continental U.S. Eagles nesting in Washington commonly winter in British Columbia and Southeast Alaska where winter runs of salmon occur. A few thousand birds can be found throughout the state where waterfowl and fish congregate. Bald eagles are present in Washington throughout the year, with primary breeding areas on large bodies of water west of the Cascades. The main wintering areas are along the coast of the Olympic Peninsula, the San Juan Islands, Puget Sound and its major tributaries, the Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers, and Hood Canal (Rodrick and Milner 1991). Nesting, foraging, and perching habitat for bald eagles is typically associated with water features such as rivers, lakes, and coast shorelines where eagles prey upon fish, waterfowl, and seabirds (Stalmaster 1980, 1983, 1987). During breeding season, eagles establish and maintain territorial boundaries, and breeding birds would rarely be found in high numbers. Breeding eagles show strong fidelity to a particular nesting territory, and would prevent other eagles from entering it (Grubb 1980). Territories frequently contain two or more nests, but would be used exclusively by one breeding pair, thereby reducing competition for local food resources. Suitable nesting habitat for bald eagles is typically in mature forests that contain large, dominant trees for nesting, and is in close proximity to aquatic foraging habitat (Anthony and Isaacs 1989). Douglas -fir appears to be the most common tree species used for nesting in forests of western Oregon and Washington. Lack of suitable nesting habitat has been shown to be a limiting factor for population growth in some raptors (Newton 1979). Unoccupied nests may indicate suitable physical habitat attributes are available but human activity precludes their successful use (Anthony and Isaacs 1989). Bald eagles may spend nights together in communal roosts, more commonly in winter and extreme weather. Many roosts are traditional sites that are used repeatedly and are typically located in areas where the eagles have protection from the weather, and away from human activity (Hansen et al. 1980). Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) Pileated woodpecker excavations were found in snags at several locations on the property (AlderNW 2002). This woodpecker is a candidate for listing as a threatened species by WDFW. These woodpeckers generally inhabit mature and old -growth forests, or second -growth forests with sufficient large snags and fallen trees (Rodrick and Milner 1991). Pileated woodpeckers are also reported to use open woodlands, Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement B-1 November 2003 parks, and wooded suburbs (Ehrlich et al. 1988) and are regularly seen in those habitats in the Puget Sound vicinity. They excavate cavities in snags or large dead branches for nesting and usually make a new nest cavity every year. Nest snags are usually greater than 27-inches in diameter and taller than 87- feet. No large trees which would likely be used as nest locations were observed on -site, nor were any pileated woodpeckers seen or heard during the site visits (A1derNW). Pileated woodpeckers usually forage in forests at least 40-years old, feeding primarily on carpenter ants, beetle larvae, and other insects in large snags and stumps. In foraging, they dig large distinctive excavations in snags or live trees, leaving piles of chips on the ground. During the fall, they also feed on fruits, nuts, and acorns (Ehrlich et al. 1988). The average home range size on the west side of the Cascades is 1,200-acres, but some studies have found that the density of these woodpeckers increased with the abundance of large conifers and snags (Rodrick and Milner 1988). Foraging excavations were noted in snags at several locations on the property. Snags are uniformly but sparsely distributed across the site. The property is too small to support a pair of pileated woodpeckers. It is likely that this site is part of a larger foraging territory (AlderNW). Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) completed an ESA status review of chinook salmon populations from Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and California and defined 15 evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) (each considered a species under the ESA) from throughout the region. Naturally spawned spring, summer/fall, and fall chinook salmon runs from the Puget Sound ESU were considered likely to become endangered in the foreseeable future (Myers et al. 1998). The abundance of chinook salmon in the Puget Sound ESU has declined substantially from historic levels, and there is concern over the effects of hatchery supplementation on genetic fitness of stocks, as well as severely degraded spawning and rearing habitats throughout the area (Myers et al. 1998). In addition, harvest exploitation rates in excess of 90-percent were estimated on some Puget Sound chinook salmon stocks. Subsequent to this status review, NMFS issued a ruling in May 1999 listing the Puget Sound ESU as threatened (NMFS 1999a). Primary factors contributing to declines in chinook salmon in the Puget Sound ESU include: habitat blockages, hatchery introgression, urbanization, logging, hydropower development, harvests, and flood control and flood effects (NMFS 1998). In general, summer/fall chinook salmon migrate into freshwater in August and September (Wydoski and Whitney 1979). Spawn timing begins in late September and peaks in October, similar to other chinook salmon stocks in south Puget Sound (WDF et al. 1993). Adult chinook in the Hylebos Creek Basin would be downstream of the work area from August through early October. After emergence, juvenile chinook rear in fresh water from a few days to 3 years (Wydoski and Whitney 1979), however, most juvenile chinook salmon in Puget Sound rivers and creeks migrate to the marine environment during their first year (Myers et al. 1998). These chinook are called "ocean type" due to their short freshwater residence and because they make extensive use of the nearshore marine environment for rearing. Ocean type chinook generally migrate downstream in the spring, just months after emerging from the gravel, or during the summer and autumn after a brief period of rearing in fresh water (Healey 1991; Myers et al. 1998). Juvenile chinook salmon that remain in fresh water after emergence may migrate to the ocean any time of year, though most chinook salmon within a population tend to migrate at similar times and ages (Healey 1991). Migration is most commonduring the night under the cover of darkness, although some fish may migrate during the day (Healey 1991). Chinook salmon fry tend to migrate along the banks and avoid the high velocity water (thalweg) near the center of the channel (Healey 1991). Christian Faith Center 554-244I-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement B-2 November 2003 Coho Salmon (O. kisufch) A status review of coho salmon was recently completed by NMFS in response to petitions seeking to list several Pacific Northwest populations as threatened or endangered (Weitkamp et al. 1995). Based on genetic, life history, biogeographic, geologic, and environmental information, six ESUs were defined for coho salmon in Washington, Oregon, and California. Despite recent stable trends in population abundance near historic levels, the status of the Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia ESU was determined to warrant further consideration for listing due to concerns over current genetic, environmental, and habitat conditions (NMFS 1995). Risk factors identified as potentially deleterious to Puget Sound coho salmon stocks included high harvest rates, extensive habitat degradation, unfavorable ocean conditions, and declines in adult size (Weitkamp et al. 1995). The genetic fitness of Puget Sound coho salmon stocks has been altered by widespread and intensive artificial propagation that includes interbasin transfers of broodstock, and by natural spawning between wild and hatchery fish. Hatchery supplementation in south Puget Sound, including Lake Washington, has been particularly extensive (Weitkamp et al. 1995). In south Puget Sound, adults enter fresh water in September and October, and spawning takes place mostly from late October through January (Williams et al. 1975; WDF et al. 1993). As is typical for coho salmon, smolts migrate with increased spring flows, between mid -April and mid -July with peak migration in May (Williams et al. 1975; WDF et al. 1993). Coho salmon typically return to spawn at age 3, though sexually mature 2-year-old males are not unusual. These "jacks", as they are called, return to fresh water to spawn after only 5 to 7 months at sea. The proportion of jacks within a population is highly variable and is influenced by genetic and environmental factors (Weitkamp et al. 1995). All coho salmon are semelparous, that is, they die after spawning. Coho salmon usually spend 2 weeks or less on the spawning grounds from the time of their arrival to the time of their death (Sandercock 1991). Coho salmon typically hatch after 6 to 8 weeks and emerge from the gravel 2 to 3 weeks later (Wydoski and Whitney 1979). The length of time required for incubation depends largely on water temperatures, as it does for other salmonids. After emergence coho salmon feed voraciously on terrestrial and aquatic insects, often selecting prey that drifts on the surface or in the water column (Sandercock 1991). Coho salmon generally rear in fresh water from 1 to 2 years then emigrate to salt water where they remain for about 18 months prior to returning to fresh water to spawn (Wydoski and Whitney 1979; Sandercock 1991). Typically, coho salmon smolts emigrate with increased spring flows, between mid -April and mid - July with peak migration in May. The most productive rearing areas for coho salmon tend to be the small streams with abundant slack water habitats (Wydoski and Whitney 1979; Sandercock 1991). Rearing juvenile coho salmon tend to prefer pools (Bisson et al. 1988) and woody debris is an important structural element that creates this type of habitat (Bustard and Narver 1975; Bisson et al. 1987). Woody debris also provides areas of cover, and provides food to many aquatic insects that are in turn prey for rearing coho salmon juveniles and other salmonids. As winter nears and flows increase coho salmon would commonly seek refuge in ponds and small tributaries where they can avoid being flushed downstream during extreme high flow events (Peterson 1982; Cederholm and Scarlett 1982). Diking, dredging, ditching, and other methods of bank protection have vastly reduced the amount of complex low -gradient side channels available for coho salmon summer and winter rearing habitat in many basins throughout the region. Beechie et al. (1994) estimate that in some basins greater than half of this type of habitat has been lost to the effects of land -use practices. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement B-3 November 2003 Sources Anthony, R.G. and F.B. Isaacs. 1989. Characteristics of bald eagle nest sites in Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:148-159. Bald Eagle Protection Act of 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668-668d, 54 Stat. 250) as amended. Accessed on-line at: ht!p:lliaws.fws.gov/lawsdigestfbaidegl.himl. Bisson, P.A., R.E. Bilby, M.D. Bryant, C.A. Dolloff, G.B. Grette, R.A. House, M.L. Murphy, K.V. Koski, and J.R. Sedell. 1987. Large woody debris in forested streams in the Pacific Northwest. Pages 143-190 in E.O. Salo and T.W. Cundy, eds. Streamside management: Forestry and fisheries interactions, proceedings of a symposium. University of Washington Institute of Forest Resources, Contribution 57. Seattle, Washington. Bisson, P.A., K. Sullivan, and J.L. Nielsen. 1988. Channel hydraulics, habitat use, and body form of juvenile coho salmon, steelhead, and cutthroat trout in streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 117: 262-273. Bottorff, J., J. Schafer, D. Swanson, A. Elston, and D. Anderson. 1987. Noise disturbance study on bald eagles at Orcas and Shaw Island ferry terminals, San Juan County, Washington. Report to the Washington State Department of Transportation. 19 pp. Bustard, D.R., and D.W. Narver. 1975. Preferences of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki) relative to simulated alteration of winter habitat. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32: 681-687. Cederholm, C.J. and W. Scarlett. 1982. Seasonal immigrations of juvenile salmonids into four small tributaries of the Clearwater River, Washington, 1977-1981. Pages 98-110 in E.L. Brannon and E.O. Salo, eds. Proceedings of the salmon and trout migratory behavior symposium, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). July 2000. Focus Number 00-10-046: Effects of Elevated Water Temperatures on Salmonids. Ecology (Washington State Department of Ecology). Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. 2001. Ehrlich, P. R., D. S. Dobkin, and D. Wheye. 1988. The birder's handbook. Simon and Schuster, New York. Fraser, J.D., L.D. Frenzel, and J.E. Mathisen. 1985. The impact of human activities on breeding bald eagles in north -central Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management 49:585-592. Friends of Hylebos Creek. 2000. State of Hylebos: A Progress Report on Efforts to Protect and Restore Wild Salmon in Hylebos Creek. Available on-line at: http://www.hylebos.org/News/ Publications/State_of. Hylebos.pdf. Grubb, T.G. 1980. An evaluation of bald eagle nesting in western Washington. Washington Bald Eagle Symposium Proceedings, June 14-15, 1980. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle, Washington. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement B-4 November 2003 Hansen, A.J., M.V. Stalmaster, and J.R. Newman. 1980. Habitat characteristics, function, and destruction of bald eagle communal roosts in western Washington. Washington Bald Eagle Symposium Proceedings, June 14-15, 1980. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle, Washington. Healey, M.C. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pages 311-393 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, editors. Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. Hylebos Creek and Lower Puget Sound Current and Future Conditions Report. King County. 1990 King County. Surface Water Design Manual. 1998. Mathisen, J.E. 1968. Effects of human disturbance on nesting bald eagles. Journal of Wildlife Management 32:1-6. Myers, J.M., R.G. Kope, G.J. Bryant, D. Teel, L.J. Lierheimer, T.C. Mainwright, W.S. Grant, F.K. Waknitz, K. Neely, S.T. Lindley, and R.S. Waples. 1998. Status review of chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-35. 443 pp. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1998. Factors contributing to the decline of chinook salmon: an addendum to the 1996 west coast steelhead factors for decline report. Protect Resources Division, Portland, Oregon. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1999a. Endangered and threatened species; threatened status for three chinook salmon evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) in Washington and Oregon, and endangered status for one chinook salmon ESU in Washington. Final Rule. March 24, 1999. Federal Register 64(56):14308-14328. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1999b. Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Guidance. Office of Habitat Conservation. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2000. Appendix A: Description and Identification of Essential Fish Habitat, Adverse Impacts and Recommended Conservation Measures for Salmon. Amendment 14 to the Pacific Coast Salmon Plan. Pacific Fishery Management Council. January 1999. Available at the PSMFC website at: httt)://www.pcouncil.orJ. Newton, I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. Buteo Books, Vermillion, South Dakota. 399 pages. Peterson, P. 1982. Immigration of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) into riverine ponds. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39: 1308-1310. Richter, Joanne. 1999. Urban Runoff Water Quality: A Salmonid's Perspective. Watershed Professionals Network. Available on-line at: htW:I/www.4sos.orcLwssupport/ws restfurhan- Runoff.doc. Rodrick, E. and R. Milner. 1991. Management recommendations for Washington's priority habitats and species. Wash. Dep. Wildl., Olympia, WA. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement B-5 November 2003 Sandercock, F. K. 1991. Life history of coho salmon. Pages 396-445 in C. Groot and L. Margolis editors. Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia. Stalmaster, M.V. 1980. Management strategies for wintering bald eagles in the Pacific Northwest. Pages 49-67 in Proceedings of the Washington bald eagle symposium. R.L. Knight, G.T. Allen, M.V. Stalmaster, and C.W. Servheen, eds., The Nature Conservancy, Seattle, Washington. Stalmaster, M.V. 1983. An energetics simulation model for managing wintering bald eagles. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:349-359. Stalmaster, M.V. 1987. The bald eagle. Universe Books, New York, NY. 227 pp. Stalmaster, M.V. and J.R. Newman. 1979. Perch -site preferences of wintering bald eagles in northwest Washington. J. of Wildlife Manage. 43:221-224. Streamnet. 2002. Hylebos Creek Watershed Fish Usage Data Query. Conducted 12 November 2002. Accessible on-line at: http://%vww.streamnet.orglonline-data/guery-intro.html. Summary of Tri-County Model 4(d) Proposal. King County. Accessed on-line at: http://www.metrokc.gov/ exec/news/2001/0104011_4dsumm.doc. Updated January 4, 2001. USFWS (Fish and Wildlife Service). 1999. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; Proposed rule to remove the Bald Eagle in the lower 48 states from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife; Proposed Rule July 6, 1999. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Register 64(128): 36453-36464. WAC 232-12-292. Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Rules. Accessed on-line at: http://www .leg. wa.gov/wac/index.cfm?fuseaction=Section&Section=232-12-292. WDF (Washington Department of Fisheries). 1975. A Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Utilization Volume 1 Puget Sound Region. Olympia, WA. WDF (Washington Department of Fisheries), Washington Department of Wildlife, and Western Washington Treaty Indian Tribes. 1993. 1992 Washington state salmon and steelhead stock inventory (SASSI): summary report. Washington Department of Fisheries, Olympia, Washington. 212 pp. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 1998 Salmonid Stock Inventory (SASI) Bull Trout/Dolly Varden Volume. Accessed on-line at: http://www.wa.gov/wdfw/fish/sassilbulldolly.htm. Updated in 2000. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2000 Salmonid Stock Inventory (SASI) Coastal Cutthroat Trout Volume. Accessed on-line at: http://www.wa.gov/wdfw/fish/sassi/ cutthroat.htm. Updated in 2000. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Salmonid Stock Inventory. Accessed on-line at: http://www.wa.gov/wdfw/fish/sassi/sassi.htm. Updated in 2000. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement B-6 November 2003 WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). State Species of Concern. Accessed on-line at: http://www.wa.gov/wdfw/wlm/diversty/soc/soc.htm. Current as -of June 2002. Weitkamp, L.A., T.C. Mainwright, G.J. Bryant, G.B. Milner, D.J. Teel, R.G. Kope, and R.S. Waples. 1995. Status review of coho salmon from Washington, Oregon, and California. U.S. Department of Commerce. NOAA Technical Memo NMFS-NWFSC-24. 285 p. Williams, R.W., R. Laramie, and J.J. Ames. 1975. A catalog of Washington streams and salmon utilization ,Volume 1, Puget Sound. Washington Department of Fisheries. Olympia, Washington. Wydoski, R.S. and R.R. Whitney. 1979. Inland Fishes of Washington. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement B-7 November 2003 APPENDIX C Distribution List APPENDIX C Distribution List City of Federal Way City Manager Community Development Services Public Works, Traffic Public Works, Surface Water Management Public works, Development Services Fire Police Local and Regional Agencies Lakehaven Utility District King County Dept. of Development and Environmental Services King County Metro Transit King County Surface Water Management King County Dept. of Transportation Pierce County Dept. of Planning and Land Services Pierce County Dept. of Public Works and Utilities Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Puyallup Tribe, Tulalip Tribes City of Algona City of Auburn City of Des Moines City of Edgewood City of Fife City of Kent City of Milton City of Pacific City of Tacoma Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Puget Sound Regional Council State Agencies Dept. of Community, Trade and Economic Development Department of Ecology Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Transportation Federal Agencies US Environmental Protection Agency US Department of Fish and Wildlife NOAA Fisheries Non -Government Organizations Federal Way Chamber of Commerce Friends of the Hylebos Wetlands King County Audubon Society Washington Environmental Council Libraries King County Library, Federal Way Regional Library Federal Way 3201h Library Woodmont Library Des Moines Branch Kent Regional Library Seattle Public Library Media Federal Way Mirror Federal Way News Seattle Times Seattle Post- Intel ligencer Tacoma News Tribune Korean News Christian Faith Center 554-2441-009 (02109) DRAFT - Environmental Impact Statement C-1 November 2003 King County Dept of Assessments 0 r- N X E h O O N ,it O RS C 4-I Q r►' I N O r., ---- Control RightOfWay Plat ShortPlat OriginalShortPlat Parcel ------ Lot ------------ Easement — — Survey - GovernmentLot Hydro DonationLandClaim Parcel Platted Major Number city The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. Do not use for survey purposes - Apr 01, 2008 1 inch equals 100 feet 1: 1200