19-100188 (2)a PBS
October 17, 2018
Ray Vefik
Federal Way Public Schools
Capital Projects
1211 S 232"d St
Federal Way, WA 98004
Email: rvefik@fwps.org
fwpscpl8@fwps.org
RE: Mirror Lake Elementary School — Arsenic and Lead Soil Sampling
625 S 314th Street, Federal Way, Washington
PBS Project #41519.002
Federal Way Public Schools (FWPS) has contracted PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. (PBS) to evaluate the
potential for arsenic and lead contaminants in near surface soils at the site of Mirror Lake Elementary School
(MLES) prior to site redevelopment as part of the Mirror Lake Elementary School Replacement Project. On October
1, 2018 PBS performed soil sampling activities to determine the levels of arsenic and lead in shallow soil at MILES
in Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). This report presents the findings of the sampling activities and provides
recommendations for regulatory compliance as well as for the handling and management of impacted soils during
future redevelopment. The scope of services was presented in the Proposal for Arsenic and Lead Soil Testing
(WA28797) by PBS, dated August 2, 2018.
BACKGROUND
MLES is located within the widespread soil contamination plume of the former Asarco smelter operation. The
Asarco Company operated a copper smelter in Tacoma from 1890 to 1985. Smelter operations emitted an
airborne plume of particulates with arsenic, lead, and other heavy metals that were distributed over a wide region
of the Puget Sound. As a result, these metals have been found in near surface soils at concentrations which may
pose a threat to human health and/or the environment.
The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) recommends soil sampling at properties in areas with
estimated arsenic levels above the state cleanup level of 20 ppm1. Ecology's "Everett and Tacoma Smelter Search"
web page https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/smeltersearch/ maps the MLES site within a zone of potential arsenic
concentrations ranging from 20 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) to 40 mg/kg. Thus, the 20mg/kg to 40 mg/kg
range can be considered the "baseline" for arsenic concentrations in near surface soils expected on site.
REGULATORY CRITERIA
Ecology's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) has established cleanup levels for arsenic and lead for unrestricted
land use that are protective of human health and the environmentz. Results of soil sampling will be compared to
the applicable MTCA standards.
1 'Tacoma Smelter Plume Model Remedies Guidance: Sampling and cleanup of arsenic and lead contaminated soils", Washington
State Department of Ecology, June 2012, Publication No. 12-09-086-A
z "Model Toxics Control Act Regulation and Statute", Washington State Department of Ecology, 2013 Revision, Publication No.
94-06
2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN • 866,727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM
Federal Way Public Schools
Mirror Lake Elementary School Arsenic and Lead Sampling Report
October 17, 2018
Page 2
Ecology's MTCA Method A cleanup levels (CULs) for unrestricted land use for arsenic and lead are the applicable
regulatory criteria for this project.
The CUL for arsenic is 20 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
The CUL for lead is 250 mg/kg.
For reference, Ecology conducted a study to determine natural background concentrations of metals in soil for the
Puget Sound area3. The study found that the natural background concentration for arsenic in soil is 7.0 parts per
million (ppm) and 24 ppm for lead. Parts per million is roughly equivalent to mg/kg.
CHARACTERIZATION SOIL SAMPLING
On October 1, 2018, sixty (60) discrete soil samples were collected from forty-eight (48) locations around the
building landscaping and playfields of MLES. Following Ecology guidance, the property was divided into three
decision units (DUs) based on current use as playfield or landscape area. Decision units and sample locations are
shown on Figure 2. A summary of the decision units is provided below. The number of samples screened and
collected for analysis per DU for this project is based on the Ecology guidance.
Decision Units
Decision
Unit ID
Soil
disturbance
planned?
Number of
samples
collected (0-6")
Number of
samples collected
(6-12")
Acres
(approximate)
Total Number
of Samples
1
unknown
24
6
3
4.3
30
16
2
unknown
13
2.5
3
unknown
11
3
2.0
14
0-6" = Soil samples were collected from the 0-6 inch depth interval
6-12" = Soil samples were collected from the 6-12 inch depth interval
One (1) discrete sample was collected at each sample location from a depth interval of zero to six inches below
ground surface (bgs). A second discrete sample was collected at every fourth location from a depth interval of six
to twelve inches bgs. Sample locations were chosen in a manner that maximized coverage of the decision units
and did not contain areas with surface cover or buildings during the sampling activities.
Soil sample collection started just below any surface cover layer (e.g., sod or grass). A hand spade and a hand
auger were used to complete 6-inch deep test holes. A soil sample was collected at a depth of less than 6 inches
below ground surface at each location. At every fourth location, upon collection of the zero to six-inch sample, the
hole was advanced to a depth of twelve inches, and a second sample was collected from the six to twelve -inch
depth interval using the same methods described above.
3 "Natural Background Soil Metals Concentrations in Washington State", Washington State Department of Ecology, October
1994, Publication No. 94-115
41519.002
Federal Way Public Schools
Mirror Lake Elementary School Arsenic and Lead Sampling Report
October 17, 2018
Page 3
PBS personnel wore disposable nitrile gloves to protect against cross -contamination between samples. Soil
retained for analysis was packed into laboratory -provided containers, labeled and transported on ice under chain
of custody documentation to Friedman and Bruya, Inc. in Seattle, an Ecology accredited analytical laboratory.
Samples were analyzed for total arsenic and lead using EPA Method 6020. Total arsenic and lead results were
reported on a dry weight basis.
ANALYTIC RESULTS
Analytical results from soil samples collected on site are below MTCA Method A CULs for arsenic, except for two
(2) samples from two different locations. Arsenic was detected in exceedance of the CUL in samples ML-2-09 and
ML-3-04 within DU2 and DU3 at concentrations of 33.1 mg/kg and 21.6 mg/kg, respectively. All other sample
results for arsenic were below the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 20 mg/kg.
All analytical results for lead from soil samples collected on -site are below the MTCA Method A cleanup level of
250 mg/kg.
Based on the analytical results of soil samples collected on -site, average arsenic and lead concentrations were
calculated for each decision unit and are presented below.
Average Concentrations per Decision Unit
Decision Unit ID
Mean Concentration (0-6")
Mean Concentration (6-12")
As
Pb
As
Pb
1
4.3
10.6
6.9
13.4
2
8.4
13.7
4.3
10.5
3
7.5
19.7
5.7
13.2
MTCA A Cleanup Level
20
250
20
250
(0-6") (Pb / As) = Average Concentration at the zero to six-inch interval for arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in mg/kg
(6-12") (Pb / As) = Average Concentration at the six to twelve -inch interval for arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in mg/kg
Analytical results from soil samples collected on -site are summarized in Table 1. Figure 2 depicts the decision unit
boundaries and the locations where analytical results indicated lead or arsenic concentrations above MTCA
Method A CULs. Laboratory reports are provided in Attachment A.
41519.002
Federal Way Public Schools
Mirror Lake Elementary School Arsenic and Lead Sampling Report
October 17, 2018
Page 4
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the analytical results of the soil sampling, and using Ecology's Tacoma Smelter Plume Model Remedy
Guidance, June 20721, the following conclusion and recommendations were made regarding the handling and
management of project site soils.
Decision Unit 1
Analytical results from discrete soil samples collected within decision unit 1 of the MLES site indicate arsenic and
lead concentrations in soils are within the known local baseline for arsenic and lead contamination, and below
MTCA Method A CULs for unrestricted land use.
No further regulatory action or evaluation is required for the soil within decision unit 1. Should soil from these
areas be scheduled for removal and exported from the site, additional testing may be required for the purposes of
off -site use or disposal by the accepting user or facility.
Decision Units 2 and 3
Analytical results from discrete soil samples collected within decision units 2 and 3 of the MLES site identified two
(2) locations (ML-2-09 and ML-3-04) where arsenic concentrations are above MTCA Method A CULs.
Further action will be required to address the arsenic concentrations in soil and achieve compliance with MTCA
regulations. According to Ecology's Model Remedies Guidance, the impacted soil can be managed in -place or
removed by excavation. Strategies for management of impacted soil in -place include dilution of arsenic
concentrations via mixing of impacted soil with clean imported soil or capping of soil in place with clean soil and a
geotextile or a hard cap. Mixing of soils is accepted for arsenic -impacted soil with an average concentration less
than 40 ppm. The mixing option requires testing to confirm levels meet the MTCA criteria. Ecology does not
consider capping in -place a permanent remediation strategy given the potential for exposure if the cap is
removed. Capping in -place may require annual inspection of the cap's integrity, as well as the filing of an
environmental land covenant for the property. Given the intended land use, PBS recommends removal of the
impacted soil from the site.
Remediation of impacted soils can be conducted by the contractor as part of the Mirror Lake Elementary School
Replacement Project under PBS's supervision, but must be completed prior to any grading, excavation or
earthwork activities that disturb on -site soil. The construction design and specifications for remediation of the
arsenic -impacted soil as part of the Mirror Lake Elementary School Replacement Project shall incorporate health
and safety requirements, methods for soil removal, disposal and confirmation sampling and soil management
strategies.
41519.002
Federal Way Public Schools
Mirror Lake Elementary School Arsenic and Lead Sampling Report
October 17, 2018
Page 5
LIMITATIONS
This investigation was conducted to characterize lead and arsenic distributions in shallow soils on -site, with a
focus on protection of human health and the environment. The data collected in this investigation are not
intended for the purposes waste profiling for offsite disposal, or for estimation of volume or tonnage of soil
requiring disposal.
PBS has prepared this report for use by FWPS. This report is not intended for use by others without the written
consent of the FWPS. Our interpretation of soil conditions in this study was based on field observations and
analytical data from the indicated explorations. Regulated substances may exist in portions of the site that were
not explored or analyzed. The conclusions in this report are not to be considered a legal opinion as the client's
duty concerning due diligence relating to potential liabilities in leasing, owning, or purchasing real estate.
PBS ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
Digitally signed by James
Welles
Date: 2018.10.17 16,09:08
-07'00'
James Welles, LG
Project Geologist
Reviewed By:
Digitally signed by
Thomas Mergy
Date:2018.10.17
16:14:13-07'00'
Thomas Mergy, LHG
Environmental Services Manager
Attachments:
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Sample Location Map
Table 1: Laboratory Data Summary Table
Attachment A: Laboratory Data
41519.002
SEATTLE
FEDERAL WAY
OLYMPIA
-SITE
VANCOUVER
WASHINGTON
SOURCE: USGS POVERTY BAY, WA QUADRANGLE 1990,
PHOTO REVISED 1994
SCALE 1" = 2000'
0' 1,000' 2,000' 4,000'
PREPARED FOR: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
PBS
VICINITY MAP
MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
625 SOUTH 31TH STREET
FEDERAL WAY4WASH NGTON
°519002
FIGURE
1
Id
S314THST SUBJECT PROPERTY
ML-2-01
0 ML-1-01 0 ML-1-02 0 ML-1-03 /0
ML
0 ML-1-04 MIL-3-011SP
0 M trl -05.. 0 ML-1-06
ML-3-03
0 ML-1 -07 0 ML- 1 -08
k
DECISION UNIT 3
0 ML-1-10
DECISION UNIT 1
MIRROR LAKE, ML-346 0
-ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL-
0 ML-1-13
% ML-1-14'
0 ML-3-07
DECISION UNIT 2 ry
N 0
0 ML -09
0 ML-1-16 0 ML-1-17 0 -197 L-2-104 ML-3-08
eL2 Z�05 0 L_ 4
L-.2-06 ML- 8
0 ML-1720
2
0 ML-1-19 I OML-3-lu
ML-2-11
M 0 ML-1-,22 0 ML -2-100
ML-2-12 0
MLt,
SOURCE: @ 2018 GOOGLE EARTH PRO
LEGEND
* ML-1-01 SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION, DECISION UNIT
AND IDENTIFICATION (0-6")
* ML-1-04 SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION, DECISION UNIT
AND IDENTIFICATION (0-6", 6-12")
SCALE 1 125'
0. 62'-6" 125' 250'
PREPARED FOR: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
OCT 2018
As / Pb SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION MAP 41519.002
P
MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FIGURE B S 625 SOUTH 314TH STREET
FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 2
Tables
Site:
Address:
PBS Project No.
Table 1 - Soil Sample Analytical Results
Mirror Lake Elementary School
625 S 314th Street, Federal Way, WA
41519.002
Location / Sample
Identification
Sample Depth
(inches bgs)
Metals
Arsenic
m /k
Lead
(m /k
Regulatory Criteria
MTCA Method A
Cleanup Level
20
250
Decision Unit 1 (-4.3 acres)
M L-1-01
0-6
4.92
13.5
ML-1-02
0-6
4.41
11.6
M L-1-03
0-6
3.53
11.1
M L-1-04a
0-6
5.61
13.5
ML-1-05
0-6
4.49
11.5
M L-1-06
0-6
4.4
11.3
M L-1-07a
0-6
5.02
12.4
M L-1-08
0-6
5.4
30.9
M L-1-09
0-6
4
13.6
M L-1-10
0-6
5.4
10.8
M L-1-11
0-6
4.08
13.7
ML-1-12a
0-6
5.18
9.76
M L-1-13
0-6
6.3
14.9
M L-1-14
0-6
2
2.27
M L-1-15
0-6
2.27
2.67
ML-1-16a
0-6
7.87
15.2
M L-1-17
0-6
2.21
2.89
ML-1-18
0-6
2.04
2.11
M L-1-19
0-6
9.37
28.6
ML-1-20
0-6
2.62
4.4
M L-1-21 a
0-6
4.16
6.93
M L-1-22a
0-6
1.8
2.02
M L-1-23
0-6
3.23
5.48
M L-1-24
0-6
2.15
2.78
Average
4.3
10.6
ML-1-04b
6-12
7.17
15.9
M L-1-07b
6-12
9.28
21.6
ML-1-12b
6-12
6.34
10.5
ML-1-16b
6-12
8.74
17.3
M L-1-21 b
6-12
4.64
7.46
ML-1-22b
6-12
5.37
7.48
Average
6.9
13.4
Site:
Address:
PBS Project No.
Table 1 - Soil Sample Analytical Results
Mirror Lake Elementary School
625 S 314th Street, Federal Way, WA
41519.002
Location / Sample
Identification
Sample Depth
(inches bgs)
Metals
Arsenic Lead
m /k m /k
Regulatory Criteria
MTCA Method A
Cleanup Level
20
250
Decision Unit 2 (-2.5 acres)
M L-2-01
0-6
8.8
12.9
ML-2-02
0-6
5.03
8.04
M L-2-03a
0-6
4.59
10.3
ML-2-04
0-6
4.32
6.7
M L-2-05
0-6
4.57
5.8
M L-2-06a
0-6
4.76
9.3
M L-2-07
0-6
5.51
11.5
M L-2-08
0-6
6.79
16
ML-2-09
0-6
33.1
9.09
ML-2-10
0-6
9.74
30.3
M L-2-11 a
0-6
6.52
16.1
ML-2-12
0-6
7.71
17.5
M L-2-13
0-6
7.93
24.2
Average
8A
13.7
ML-2-03b
6-12
3.8
9.25
M L-2-06 b
6-12
4.78
13.1
M L-2-11 b
6-12
4.45
9.19
Average
4.3
10.5
Decision Unit 3 (-2.0 acres)
M L-3-01 a
0-6
5.84
17.7
ML-3-02
0-6
11.2
31.5
M L-3-03
0-6
2.5
6.19
M L-3-04
0-6
21.6
49.4
M L-3-05a
0-6
4.37
12.4
M L-3-06
0-6
4.63
13.9
ML-3-07
0-6
6.66
16.7
M L-3-08
0-6
3.21
15.1
M L-3-09a
0-6
3.71
8.62
ML-3-10
0-6
7.35
21.1
ML-3-11
0-6
11.1
24.0
Average
7.5
19.7
ML-3-01 b
6-12
6.34
13.5
ML-3-05b
6-12
4.74
12.7
ML-3-09b
6-12
5.93
13.3
Average
5.7
13.2
Arsenic and lead analyzed by U5 EPA Method 6026
mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram
bold = concentration exceeds adopted criteria
bgs = below ground surface
Attachment A
Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Documentation
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D.
Yelena Aravkina, M.S.
Michael Erdahl, B.S.
Arina Podnozova, B.S.
Eric Young, B.S.
October 8, 2018
James Welles, Project Manager
PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
2517 Eastlake Ave E, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98102
Dear Mr Welles:
3012 16th Avenue West
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
(206) 285-8282
fbi@isomedia.com
www.friedmanandbruya.com
Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on October 1, 2018 from
the Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810016 project. There are 36 pages
included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for
disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or arrange for long
term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you
should have any questions.
Sincerely,
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl
Project Manager
Enclosures
PBS 1008R.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
CASE NARRATIVE
This case narrative encompasses samples received on October 1, 2018 by Friedman &
Bruya, Inc. from the PBS Engineering and Environmental Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv.
41519.002.0004, F&BI 810016 project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory
ID's listed below.
Laboratory ID
PBS Engineering and Environmental
810016 -01
ML-1-01
810016 -02
ML-1-02
810016 -03
ML-1-03
810016 -04
ML-1-04a
810016 -05
ML-1-04b
810016 -06
ML-1-05
810016 -07
ML-1-06
810016 -08
ML-1-07a
810016 -09
ML-1-07b
810016 -10
ML-1-08
810016 -11
ML-1-09
810016 -12
ML-1-10
810016 -13
ML-1-11
810016 -14
ML-1-12a
810016 -15
ML-1-12b
810016 -16
ML-1-13
810016 -17
ML-1-14
810016 -18
ML-1-15
810016 -19
ML-1-16a
810016 -20
ML-1-16b
810016 -21
ML-1-17
810016 -22
ML-1-18
810016 -23
ML-1-19
810016 -24
ML-1-20
810016 -25
ML-1-21a
810016 -26
ML-1-2lb
810016 -27
ML-1-22a
810016 -28
ML-1-22b
810016 -29
ML-1-23
810016 -30
ML-1-24
All quality control requirements were acceptable.
1
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-01
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-01
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-01.127
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.92
Lead 13.5
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID;
ML-1-02
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-02
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-02.179
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.41
Lead 11.6
3
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-03
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-03
Date Analyzed:
10102/18
Data File:
810016-03.180
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 3.53
Lead 11.1
4
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-04a
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-04
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-04.181
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.61
Lead 13.5
5
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-04b
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18 )
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-05
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File.
810016-05.182
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 7.17
Lead 15.9
IT
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-05
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-06
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-06.185
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.49
Lead 11.5
7
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-06
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-07
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-07.186
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.36
Lead 11.3
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-07a
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-08
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-08.187
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.02
Lead 12.4
WE
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-07b
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab II]:
810016-09
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-09.188
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 9.28
Lead 21.6
10
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-08
Client:
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
Concentration
Analyte:
mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic
5.40
Lead
30.9
11
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
810016-10
810016-10.189
ICPMS2
SP
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-09
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-11
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-11.190
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.27
Lead 13.6
12
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-10
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-12
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-12.191
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.44
Lead 10.8
13
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-11
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-13
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-13.192
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.08
Lead 13.7
14
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-12a
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-14
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-14.193
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.18
Lead 9.76
15
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-12b
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-15
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-15.194
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 6.34
Lead 10.5
16
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-13
Client:
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID -
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
Concentration
Analyte:
mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic
6.30
Lead
14.9
17
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519,002.0004
810016-16
810016-16.197
ICPMS2
SP
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-14
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-17
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-17.198
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 2.00
Lead 2.27
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
MI-1-15
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-18
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-18.199
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 2.27
Lead 2.67
we,
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-16a
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-19
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-19.200
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 7.87
Lead 15.2
20
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Cheat ID:
ML-1-16b
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracte d:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-20 '
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-20.201
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 8.74
Lead 17.3
21
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-17
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-21
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-21.132
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 2.21
Lead 2.89
22
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-18
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-22
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-22.203
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 2.04
Lead 2.11
23
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-19
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received;
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-23
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-23.204
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 9.37
Lead 28.6
24
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS .
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-20
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-24
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-24.205
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units_
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 2.62
Lead 4.40
25
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-21a
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-25 -
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-25.206
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.16
Lead 6.93
26
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-21b
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-26
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-26.209
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.64
Lead 7.46
27
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client 1D:
Mt-1-22a
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-27
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-27.210
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 1.80
Lead 2.02
RM
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-22b
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-28
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-28.211
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.37
Lead 7.48
29
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-23
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810016-29
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-29.212
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 3.23
Lead 5.48
30
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-1-24
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab II]:
810016-30
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
810016-30.213
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 2.15
Lead 2.78
31
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
Method Blank
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
Not Applicable
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
I8-657 mb
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
I8-657 mb.125
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic <1
Lead <1
32
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
Method Blank
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received;
Not Applicable
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted.
10/02/18
Lab ID:
I8-658 mb
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
I8-658 mb.130
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic <1
Lead <1
33
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 10/08/18
Date Received: 10/01/18
Project: Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810016
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS
FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL METALS USING EPA METHOD 6020B
Laboratory Code:
810016-01 (Matrix Spike)
Sample Percent Percent
Reporting
Spike
Result Recovery Recovery
Acceptance
RPD
Analyte
Units
Level (Wet wt)
MS MSD
Criteria
Limit 20
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
10
4.58
98 102
75-125
4
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50
12.5
97 102
75-125
5
Laboratory Code:
Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Reporting
Spike
Recovery
Acceptance
Analyyte
Units
Level
LCS
Criteria
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
10
100
80-120
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50
103
80-120
34
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 10/08/18
Date Received: 10/01/18
Project: Mirror Lake As/Pb Inv. 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810016
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS
FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL METALS USING EPA METHOD 6020B
Laboratory Code:
810016-21 (Matrix Spike)
Sample
Percent
Percent
Reporting
Spike
Result
Recovery
Recovery
Acceptance
RPD
Anal e
Units
Level
(Wet wt)
MS
MSD
Criteria
(Limit 20
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
10
2.08
98
98
75-125
0
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50
2.71
97
95
75-125
2
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Reporting
Spike
Recovery
Analyte Units
Level
LCS
Arsenic mg/kg (ppm)
10
101
Lead mg/kg (ppm)
50
104
35
Acceptance
Criteria
80-120
80-120
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Data Qualifiers & Definitions
a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not
provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix
spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for the analyte were outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an
estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
cf - The sample was centrifuged prior to analysis.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits were raised and surrogate recoveries may not be
meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample volume was available to achieve normal reporting limits.
f - The sample was laboratory filtered prior to analysis.
fb - The analyte was detected in the method blank.
fc - The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control
limits. Variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
hs - Headspace was present in the container used for analysis.
ht — The analysis was performed outside the method or client -specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the
quantitation of the analyte.
j - The analyte concentration is reported below the lowest calibration standard. The value reported is an
estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration
is an estimate.
jl - The laboratory control sample(s) percent recovery and/or RPD were out of control limits. The
reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
- The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should
te The
an estimate.
lc - The presence of the analyte is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the
RPD is not applicable.
pc - The sample was received with incorrect preservation or in a container not approved by the method.
The value reported should be considered an estimate.
ve - The analyte response exceeded the valid instrument calibration range. The value reported is an
estimate.
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
36
n o o `
o� �' a 1 it 1 10a
o as � C6 4 � :� ""' ;; •: .�,..
ri
00
kv,
foe
G
'R
d A
a� 01
::
NONE
slim,
- " -.
�
o
LI
z
z
�N
f
d rn
i
rL
fl
Rp
vu
.�f
ya •..
�o
--
b
i eta
�0.
ON
�
qp
[Y m•
^�i
_y ri
��rV �
_ •-.. vj
E'
_
-r�.
�r
r
•'�'
��Pppr
S7. '�
d
z
e
a a
p Q
o
rn
a
co
�H
i
m
�
K �
ro
TPH-Diesel
Cn
TPH-Gasoline
B'T'EX by 8021B
VOCs by 8260
SVOCs by 8270
a
z
HFS
_..
�6a
i 10
y
G
�a
t3
oaf
N
V4 .
i
2
o
W
Hy
r
V
`'�
(7
�
a
f
•�
O
im
� x o
:eV 5! �m 0
m C a "
4M * •�
� m TA � ¢. � # QD •
co
N
0 9 `� tj*
\
\
»�
bƒt.�§J�
00
/
/
k
%
to
`
�
��
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D.
Yelena Aravkina, M.S.
Michael Erdahl, B.S.
Arina Podnozova, B.S.
Eric Young, B.S.
October 8, 2018
James Welles, Project Manager
PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
2517 Eastlake Ave E, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98102
Dear Mr Welles:
3012 16th Avenue West
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
(206) 285-8282
fbi@isomedia.com
www.friedmanandbruya.com
Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on October 1, 2018 from
the Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810017 project. There are
20 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently
scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or
arrange for long term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you
should have any questions.
Sincerely,
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl
Project Manager
Enclosures
PBS 1008R.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC_
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
CASE NARRATIVE
This case narrative encompasses samples received on October 1, 2018 by Friedman &
Bruya, Inc. from the PBS Engineering and Environmental Mirror Lake Pb/As
Investigation 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810017 project. Samples were logged in under the
laboratory ID's listed below.
Laboratory ID
PBS Engineering and Environmental
810017 -01
ML-2-01
810017 -02
ML-2-02
810017 -03
ML-2-03A
810017 -04
ML-2-03B
810017 -05
ML-2-04
810017 -06
ML-2-05
810017 -07
ML-2-06A
810017 -08
ML-2-06B
810017 -09
ML-2-07
810017 -10
ML-2-08
810017 -11
ML-2-09
810017 -12
ML-2-10
810017 -13
ML-2-11A
810017 -14
ML-2-1113
810017 -15
ML-2-12
810017 -16
ML-2-13
All quality control requirements were acceptable.
1
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-01
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-01
Date Analyzed
10/02/18
Data File:
810017-01.139
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 8.80
Lead 12.9
F
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-02
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Recei►aed:
10/01/18'
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-02
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-02.229
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.03
Lead 8.04
3
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-03A
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-03
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-03.230
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.59
Lead 10.3
4
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-03B
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-04
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-04.233
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 3.80
Lead 9.25
5
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
MI-2-04
Client:
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
Concentration
Analyte:
mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic
4.32
Lead
6.67
L
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
810017-05
810017-05.234
ICPMS2
SP
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-05
Client:
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
Concentration
Analyte:
mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic
4.57
Lead
5.81
7
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
810017-06
810017-06.235
ICPMS2
SP
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-06A
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted.
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-07
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-07.236
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.76
Lead 9.27
0
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-06B
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-08
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-08.237
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS 2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.78
Lead 13:i
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-07
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-09
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-09.238
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.51
Lead 11.5
10
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-08
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-10
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-10.239
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP-
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 6.79
Lead 16.0
11
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-09
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-11
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-11.240
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 33.1
Lead 9.09
12
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-10
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-12
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-12.241
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 9.74
Lead 30.3
13
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-11A
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-13
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-13.242
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 6.52
Lead 16.1
14
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-11B
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-14
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-14.245
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.45
Lead 9.19
15
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
AM-2-12
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-15
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810017-15.246
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 7.71
Lead 17.5
16
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-2-13
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received;
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810017-16
Date Analyzed.
10/03/18
❑ata File:
810017-16.247
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 7.93
Lead 24.2
17
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
Method Blank
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
Not Applicable
Project:
Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
I8-659 mb
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
I8-659 mb.137
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic <1
Lead <1
In
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 10/08/18
Date Received: 10/01/18
Project: Mirror Lake Pb/As Investigation 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810017
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS
FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL METALS USING EPA METHOD 6020B
Laboratory Code:
810017-01 (Matrix Spike)
Sample Percent
Percent
Reporting
Spike
Result Recovery Recovery
Acceptance
RPD
Analyte
Units
Level
(Wet wt)
MS MSD
Criteria
(Limit 20
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
10
6.90 ca
90 94
75-125
4
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50
12.2
96 101
75-125
5
Laboratory Code:
Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Reporting
Spike
Recovery
Acceptance
Analyte
Units
Level
LCS
Criteria
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
10
100
80-120
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50
105
80-120
19
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Data Qualifiers & Definitions
a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not
provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix
spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for the analyte were outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an
estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
cf - The sample was centrifuged prior to analysis.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits were raised and surrogate recoveries may not be
meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample volume was available to achieve normal reporting limits.
f - The sample was laboratory filtered prior to analysis.
fb - The analyte was detected in the method blank.
fc - The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control
limits. Variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
hs - Headspace was present in the container used for analysis.
ht — The analysis was performed outside the method or client -specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the
quantitation of the analyte.
j - The analyte concentration is reported below the lowest calibration standard. The value reported is an
estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration
is an estimate.
jl - The laboratory control sample(s) percent recovery and/or RPD were out of control limits. The
reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
s The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should
e considered an estimate.
le - The presence of the analyte is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the
RPD is not applicable.
pc - The sample was received with incorrect preservation or in a container not approved by the method.
The value reported should be considered an estimate.
ve - The analyte response exceeded the valid instrument calibration range. The value reported is an
estimate.
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
20
tp
DO
70
rL
Ol
%P
TPH-DiesfA
TPH-Gasoline
BTEX by 8021B
VOCs by 8260
SVOC& by 8270
lJFS
N
>b
co
o
�
H
.
u-,
P.
t
p
91
rl
110,
C�
O
OF,
ti
rd
z■
❑
u
�
iJ2
O
y
CF]
�i
m
i
co
m
m
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
James E. Bruya, Ph.D.
Yelena Aravkina, M.S.
Michael Erdahl, B.S.
Arina Podnozova, B.S.
Eric Young, B.S.
October 8, 2018
James Welles, Project Manager
PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
2517 Eastlake Ave E; Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98102
Dear Mr Welles:
3012 16th Avenue West
Seattle, WA 98119-2029
(206) 285-8282
fbi@isomedia.com
www.friedmanandbruya.com
Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on October 1, 2018 from
the Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810018 project. There are
20 pages included in this report. Any samples that may remain are currently
scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you would like us to return your samples or
arrange for long term storage at our offices, please contact us as soon as possible.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you and hope you will call if you
should have any questions.
Sincerely,
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
Michael Erdahl
Project Manager
Enclosures
PBS 1008R.DOC
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
CASE NARRATIVE
This case narrative encompasses samples received on October 1, 2018 by Friedman &
Bruya, Inc. from the PBS Engineering and Environmental Mirror Lake As/Pb
Investigation 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810018 project. Samples were logged in under the
laboratory ID's listed below.
Laboratory ID
PBS Engineering and Environmental
810018 -01
ML-3-01A
810018 -02
ML-3-01B
810018 -03
ML-3-02
810018 -04
ML-3-03
810018 -05
ML-3-04
810018 -06
ML-3-05A
810018 -07
ML-3-05B
810018 -08
ML-3-06
810018 -09
ML-3-07
810018 -10
ML-3-08
810018 -11
ML-3-09A
810018 -12
ML-3-09B
810018 -13
ML-3-10
810018 -14
ML-3-11
All quality control requirements were acceptable.
1
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-01A
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-01
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-01.214
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.84
Lead 17.7
2
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-01B
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-02
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-02.215
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 6.34
Lead 13.5
3
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-02
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-03
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
81001-8-03.216
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 11.2
Lead 31.5
Cd
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-03
Client:
PBS Engineering and'Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-04
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-04.217
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 2.52
Lead 6.19
5
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-04
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-05
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-05.218
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 21.6
Lead 49.4
1
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-05A
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-06
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-06.224
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.37
Lead 12.4
7
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
NM-3-05B
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-07
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-07.225
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.74
Lead 12.7
L1
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-06
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-08
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-08.226
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 4.63
Lead 13.9
I
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-07
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-09
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-09.227
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 6.66
Lead 16.7
10
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-08
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-10
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-10.228
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 3.21
Lead 15.1
11
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
MI-3-09A
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Laic ID:
810018-11
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-11.248
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 3.71
Lead 8.62
12
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-09B
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-12
Date Analyzed:
10/03/18 __
Data File:
810018-12.249
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:_
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 5.93
Lead 13.3
13
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
MI-3-10
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-13
Date Analyzed:
10/03/ 18
Data File:
810018-13.250
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 7.35
Lead 21.1
14
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
ML-3-11
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
10/01/18
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted
10/02/18
Lab ID:
810018-14
Date Analyzed.
10/03/18
Data File:
810018-14.251
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic 11.1
Lead 24.0
15
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL ,CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client ID:
Method Blank
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
Not Applicable
Project:
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
I8-658 mb
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
I8-658 mb.130
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument:
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic <1
Lead <1
16
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B
Client. ID:
Method Blank
Client:
PBS Engineering and Environmental
Date Received:
Not Applicable
Project.
Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004
Date Extracted:
10/02/18
Lab ID:
I8-659 mb
Date Analyzed:
10/02/18
Data File:
I8-659 mb.137
Matrix:
Soil
Instrument.
ICPMS2
Units:
mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight
Operator:
SP
Concentration
Analyte: mg/kg (ppm)
Arsenic <1
Lead <1
17
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 10/08/18
Date Received: 10/01/18
Project: Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810018
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS
FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL METALS USING EPA METHOD 6020B
Laboratory Code:
810016-21 (Matrix Spike)
Sample
Percent Percent
Reporting
Spike Result
Recovery Recovery
Acceptance
RPD
Analvte
Units
Level (_Wet wt_)
MS MSD
Criteria
(Limit 20)
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
_
10 2.08
98 98
75-125
0
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50 2.71
97 95
75-125
2
Laboratory Code:
Laboratory Control Sample
Percent
Reporting
Spike Recovery
Acceptance
Analyte
Units
Level LCS
Criteria
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
10 101
80-120
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50 104
80-120
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 10/08/18
Date Received: 10/01/18
Project: Mirror Lake As/Pb Investigation 41519.002.0004, F&BI 810018
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS
FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES
FOR TOTAL METALS USING EPA METHOD 6020B
Laboratory Code:
810017-01 (Matrix Spike)
Sample
Percent Percent
Reporting
Spike
Result
Recovery Recovery
Acceptance
RPD
Analyte
Units
Level
(Wet wt)
MS MSD
Criteria
(Limit 20)
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
10
6.90 ca
90 94
75-125
4
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50
12.2
96 101
75-125
5
Laboratory Code:
Laboratory Contrd
Sample
Percent
Reporting
Spike
Recovery
Acceptance
Analyte
Units
Level
LCS
Criteria
Arsenic
mg/kg (ppm)
10
100
80-120
Lead
mg/kg (ppm)
50
105
80-120
19
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Data Qualifiers & Definitions
a - The analyte was detected at a level less than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not
provide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
b - The analyte was spiked at a level that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix
spike recoveries may not be meaningful.
ca - The calibration results for the analyte were outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an
estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
cf - The sample was centrifuged prior to analysis.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits were raised and surrogate recoveries may not be
meaningful.
dv - Insufficient sample volume was available to achieve normal reporting limits.
f - The sample was laboratory filtered prior to analysis.
fb - The analyte was detected in the method blank.
fc - The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control
limits. Variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
hs - Headspace was present in the container used for analysis.
lit — The analysis was performed outside the method or client -specified holding time requirement.
ip - Recovery fell outside of control limits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the
quantitation of the analyte.
j - The analyte concentration is reported below the lowest calibration standard. The value reported is an
estimate.
J - The internal standard associated with the analyte is. out of control limits. The reported concentration
is an estimate.
jl - The laboratory control samples) percent recovery and/or RPD were out of control limits. The
reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
- The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of control limits. The reported concentration should
to The
an estimate.
lc - The presence of the analyte is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L - The reported concentration was generated from a library search.
nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the
RPD is not applicable.
pc - The sample was received with incorrect preservation or in a container not approved by the method.
The value reported should be considered an estimate.
ve - The analyte response exceeded the valid instrument calibration range. The value reported is an
estimate.
vo - The value reported fell outside the control limits established for this analyte.
x - The sample chromatographic pattern does not resemble the fuel standard used for quantitation.
20
R"
5, c
<
Cb
Ili-
all,
t�
. cn
4
�
�
�
o
n
wft
ray+
!
_
fi
TPH-Diesel
TPH-Gasoline
BTEX by 8021E
VOCs by 8260
a
SVOCs by 9270
HFSI
�h
r�
IN
�
C
r-7
N
Jt
o
N�
ri m
c4
Zp
Ct2
4y
5
0 31
1�
ll�
�
r
MRS.,
Inmr-im
, �bll
RN
03
CD
O
tv
Go
co
'Of
Z
10
cn
Im
011ya
cn
Lakehaven
WATER St SEWER DISTRICT
316271st Avenue South • P.O. Box 4249 Federal Way, WA 98063-4249
253-941-1516 Federal Way V 253-927-2922 Tacoma www.lakehaven.org
October 23, 2018
Mike Benzien
FW PS
1211 South 332nd Street
Federal Way, Washington 98003
RE: MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — PO 18802268
Lakehaven Project No. 6318021
Mr. Benzien:
RECEIVED
JAN 10 2019
CITY OF FEDEPAL WAy Xkulmry bt-v 4P EN T
PO#
OCT 7 9 16
RECV BY:
INV TO AP;
Enclosed is the original Developer Extension (DE) Agreement for the referenced project. Please have
the appropriate party, or parties, execute and return the DE Agreement to this office within 30 days
from the date of this letter. In accordance with applicable King County rules, please do not make any
markings/etc. in the one -inch (1") clear margins of the DE Agreement pages. You will receive a fully
executed copy when completed. Lakehaven will process the original DE Agreement for recording. If
the executed DE Agreement is not returned within 30 days the project will be suspended without
further notice, and a new DE Agreement application (and deposit) to Lakehaven may be required.
Execution and return of the DE agreement is required for all Lakehaven plan review tasks/services
beyond the initial review.
Pursuant to Paragraph 3, the required sum has been submitted to initiate the project. All actual labor
and materials expenses, plus overhead, incurred by Lakehaven for the project will be expensed to the
project account. Lakehaven will review the project account on a regular basis and issue invoices as
necessary to keep the project account current. These invoices (sample enclosed) are due and payable
as noted on each invoice and the account shall remain current at all times. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT
IF AN INVOICE PAYMENT IS 30+ DAYS "PAST DUE", THEN ALL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE DE
PROJECT WILL BE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE "DELINQUENT" INVOICE AMOUNT, INCLUDING ANY
INTEREST, IS PAID IN FULL. For projects under construction, please be advised that any work
involving existing or future Lakehaven facilities, including any new service connections/stubs, will also
be suspended pending receipt of any "delinquent" payment(s).
You are required to provide accurate "as -built" data upon completion of construction. To ensure this,
a written statement from your professional consultant shall be provided prior to (and as a condition of)
scheduling the Lakehaven preconstruction meeting; confirming that accurate data will be collected in
the field by said engineer or surveyor, or employee under his/her supervision, during construction.
The engineer or surveyor is also required to provide certificates of insurance as set forth in Paragraph
9 of the referenced DE Agreement. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven project number listed above is
indicated or referenced on the certificates. You may wish to provide a copy of the DE Agreement to
the engineer or surveyor to inform him/her of the specific requirements.
Lakehaven has updated the Hydraulic Model Report previously generated for the site (FF #345c, copy
attached), to indicate the amount of new 12-inch diameter water main required to achieve the
required onsite fire flow requirement of 2,750 GPM. Please have your engineering consultant prepare
& submit water plans accordingly. When Lakehaven has declared the plan(s) adequate for approval,
one (1) rolled (do not fold) copy of each plan sheet shall be submitted to Lakehaven for approval by
Lakehaven (alternatively, the plans submitted for approval can be submitted as PDF files via email
attachment(s)). A copy of the approved plan set(s) will be provided to your design engineer, and to
your professional consultant for "as-builting" upon completion of construction. Lakehaven will use
Mike Benzien - FWPS
October 23, 2018
Page 2
copies of the approved plan set(s) for our use and in applying for right-of-way (ROW) construction
permits, and other permits and approvals, as necessary. After Lakehaven has approved the plan(s),
received all necessary permits and approvals, & all other Lakehaven preconstruction requirements are
satisfied; the developer (or designated representative) and developer's utility contractor will be
required to meet with Lakehaven representatives for a preconstruction meeting (typically held on the
2nd or 4th Thursdays of the month, 9:00 a.m. or 10:00 a.m.). At the developer's discretion, including
any additional or associated costs, the "as -built" consultant and/or the design engineer are welcome &
encouraged to attend Lakehaven's preconstruction meeting.
Please be advised that any/all construction work &/or assembly of underground piping associated with
a non-residential fire protection supply line (from, & including, the premise isolation device vault
to/into the building) must be performed by a person holding a valid Washington State "Level U"
certification. Enforcement of this standard will be managed by the jurisdictional fire marshal.
Lakehaven also requires a (developer's) certificate of insurance in the amounts indicated in Paragraph
17 of the agreement; including Lakehaven as an additional insured. It would be helpful if the
Lakehaven project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. Said certificate
must be received by Lakehaven prior to (and as a condition of) scheduling the Lakehaven
preconstruction meeting.
Lakehaven will not allow any new domestic or irrigation service connections to the water system to be
activated until the project is complete and accepted by Lakehaven, or has achieved substantial
completion status as determined by Lakehaven.
The enclosed cost estimate worksheet is provided for your convenience. Please keep in mind that this
estimate is based on information provided with your application and is subject to change as additional
information becomes available. Changes in project scope or Lakehaven fees and charges will impact
this estimate. Lakehaven fees and charges are subject to change without prior notification.
Please read the DE Agreement carefully. Conditions and requirements are detailed and laid out in
chronological order for your benefit, as well as for ease of administration. Please refer to the enclosed
Project Checklist for items/issues that need to be submitted/resolved/approved prior to scheduling the
Lakehaven preconstruction meeting (typically held on the 2nd or 4th Thursdays of the month, 9:00 a.m.
or 10:00 a.m.).
Please note that in accordance with Section W/S.1.A of Lakehaven's adopted standards, all requests
for modifications to Lakehaven's standards, specifications, policies &/or Resolution shall be made in
writing (Plan Review Checklist comment, email, letter, or fax) to Lakehaven.
Please contact me at BAsbury@Lakehaven.org or 253-946-5407 if you have any questions or need
additional information regarding the project or the enclosed DE Agreement.
Sincerely,
, L 'Z
Brian Asbury
Development Engineering Super - r
Enclosures
Ec: LPD Engineering PLLC
Ray Vefik - FWPS
Casey Moore - FWPS
Lakehaven
WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — PO 18802268
Lakehaven Project No. 6318021
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into in duplicate between the LAKEHAVEN TIATER AND
SEWER DISTRICT, King County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as "the District" and FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, hereinafter
referred to as "the Developer".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the District operates and maintains a water distribution system within its
boundaries which can serve property of the Developer, and
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to construct certain water mains and appurtenances
at its own cost to serve the Developer's property, for delivery to and operation by the District,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that:
1. The land for which domestic water service is requested and to which this
Agreement applies, is realty in King County, Washington, legally described in Exhibit "A" and
generally depicted in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
By executing this Agreement, the Developer represents and warrants that it is the owner of
record of the above -described property. If such representation of ownership is invalid, this
Agreement shall be void as to the portion of the property not owned by the Developer. The
Developer agrees that the District may require the Developer to furnish a title report for the
property at the Developer's expense.
2. All newly created legal descriptions shall be furnished by the Developer and shall
be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington.
Each newly created legal description shall be accompanied by a drawing that graphically
depicts the legal description.
3. The Developer has paid the required deposit as set forth in District Resolution
No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto. Said deposit shall be applied against
actual expenses of the District, including all bacteriological testing and sampling. The District
shall determine, on a regular basis, its actual costs associated with the project, including taxes,
and shall submit to the Developer an invoice to repay the District for actual costs in excess of
the amount previously collected. Payment shall be due as noted on said invoice. Off -hours
labor, including overhead, costs for such inspections will be charged to the project on an
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12119/17) Page 1 of 8
overtime basis. The Developer agrees that the project account shall remain current for the life
of the project and delinquency of any kind shall induce work stop action/orders,
suspension/termination of service or any other action necessary to effect collection of monies
owed the District. In the event monies are owed the District for work on, or unpaid charges
allocated to, the project, as determined by the District, Developer agrees that the District shall
be entitled to recover such monies by withholding and making application for payment to itself,
any assignment of funds, cash deposits or latecomer reimbursements otherwise owing to the
Developer. In the event that the deposit exceeds the District's actual expenses, the District
shall issue to the Developer, at project closing, a refund of such unused amounts.
4. Except as noted herein, all work conducted by the District will be performed
during normal work hours. The Developer may, at their discretion, submit a written request to
the District for District non-exempt staff to expend overtime for tasks and services related to
the completion of this Agreement. Said written request(s) shall state the Developer's reasons
for the request(s) that would qualify it as an "emergency" (e.g., "excessive" additional
expenses for any delays in plan review (actual/estimated figures should be provided),
approaching unfavorable weather conditions for construction, permit expirations, etc.). Each
written request submitted to the District for this purpose should also specify any component
limitations the Developer desires (e.g., request for plan review/approval, request for
construction inspections, etc.).
5. In the event work and construction described herein is not completed within five
(5) years from the date of application for this Agreement, said application date being OCTOBER
5, 2018, the District can terminate the Agreement without notice, the Agreement shall then be
void, and a new Developer Extension Agreement Application, along with applicable fee, will be
required to re -commence and subsequently complete said work.
6. It is agreed by the parties that time is of the essence in all matters relating to
the performance of this Agreement.
7. The Developer agrees that all requests for modification to District standards,
specifications, policies or Resolution shall be submitted in writing to the District. Such requests
shall be reviewed and the District will provide a written response to each submitted written
request.
S. The District shall review final plans and specifications for water distribution
system construction to be performed by the Developer under this Agreement. If preliminary
plans are not deemed acceptable by the District, the Developer shall be obligated to revise the
plans and specifications in accordance with design standards deemed acceptable by the
District. In the event that more than three (3) items are found to remain deficient by the
District on the third submittal of plans, subsequent review by District staff may be billed at a
factor of 1.5 times the standard rate without further notice to the Developer. The Developer
shall submit final plans for construction in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment),
and on standard print media (24"x36" or 22"x34" size), prior to scheduling the preconstruction
meeting. After the Developer has been notified in writing by the District that final plans and
specifications have been approved, and all other necessary items have been addressed and
resolved, the Developer and the Developer's contractor shall meet with the District's
representatives for a preconstruction meeting before construction is commenced.
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 2 of 8
9. The Developer agrees that it shall be responsible for providing to the District
accurate and reliable information concerning the actual location of the facilities constructed. In
furtherance of this obligation, the Developer shall- procure from LPE ENGINEERING PLLC, or
other licensed engineer or surveyor that the Developer has indicated will be consulting on the
construction phase of the project, a written statement, which shall be submitted to the District
prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, stating that accurate data will be collected
during construction of the facilities to enable the engineer/surveyor to submit actual and
reliable "as -built" locations to the District, based upon the information available to the
engineer/surveyor during construction and also by field survey of the constructed facilities that
are accessible at the ground surface. The Developer shall cause such engineer/surveyor to
submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, a certificate of
insurance for the engineer's/surveyor's Errors and Omissions policy. The Developer shall also
cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction
meeting, a certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the engineer's/surveyor's
General Liability policy, naming the District as an additional insured as respects the obligations
set forth in this section. The limits for Errors and Omissions and General Liability Insurance
shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 for each claim; $1,000,000.00 aggregate. At the
conclusion of construction and prior to and as a condition of acceptance, the engineer/surveyor
shall deliver to the District its certification that it has made periodic field investigations and
measurements during construction and that the "as -built" drawings submitted to the District,
which drawings shall be provided in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment) and on
original or fixed -line photo mylar, are accurate and reliable. The District shall have the right to
approve any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor during the project and the
Developer agrees that the District may refuse any change in the consulting engineer or
surveyor or may condition the same on resubmittal of the certification of location described
above. No approval of any new engineer or surveyor shall be unreasonably withheld by the
District.
10. The District will make application for the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 'Right-of-way
Construction Permit(s)'. The Developer acknowledges familiarity with the provisions of such
Right-of-way Construction Permit(s) and agrees that it or its contractor's failure to comply with
any of the provisions of the permit(s) shall entitle the District, in addition to the right to
enforce any other remedy available to the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY as the permitting party, to
immediately stop all construction activity on the right-of-way until the violation or violations
have been eliminated and corrected to the satisfaction of the District and the District should
not be held liable for any damages, either direct or indirect, for the delay and expense of such
work stoppage. The Developer shall procure all other state, county and city licenses or
permits.
11. The Developer agrees this Agreement shall create twenty -foot (20') wide
[pipe(s) offset five -feet (5') from nearest margin] non-exclusive easement areas and right-of-
way granted to the District for water distribution facilities and all appurtenances related
thereto, as indicated on water facility construction plans approved by the District for the
project, respectively, through, over and across the Developer's property. This easement shall
be maintained in full force and effect unless superseded and replaced by another easement as
determined acceptable by the District.
12. In the event an easement is required over realty other than realty described in
Paragraphs No. 1 & No. 11 herein, such easement, in form acceptable to the District, together
with title report or other sufficient proof of ownership of such realty, shall be delivered to the
DE Agr-6318021.dooc (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 3 of 8
District prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. The Developer shall be obligated to
obtain a written release from any property owner across whose property construction is
performed pursuant to the grant of an easement, sufficient to indicate that the site restoration
on the easement is satisfactory and complete.
13. Prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, the Developer shall deliver to
the District a restoration performance bond in a sum to be determined by the District after
receipt of any required Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and/or after the determination of
off -site restoration requirements related to the work described herein, conditioned that the
Developer will restore to the satisfaction of the District, and state, county, and city agencies as
applicable, all work to be performed hereunder in public rights -of -way and the District's
easements. Form and contents of bond shall be determined by the District. This requirement
is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held accountable for any such
restoration. Should any restoration work be determined necessary, Developer will be notified
to complete the restoration work. If such work is not corrected within the specified time, the
District will perform the work and issue an invoice to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid
within thirty (30) days of issue date.
14. Construction shall be performed in accordance with the District's approved
plans, standards and specifications and only under the supervision of a licensed contractor
experienced in the installation of water distribution system facilities and the related work.
15. Two (2) sets of materials submittals shall be submitted to the District as one
package, bound and indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment/material to be
furnished for this project. Each submitted piece of equipment/material shall be fully defined by
catalog number and reference made as to its applicable section of the District's standard
specifications. Materials submittals shall be submitted prior to scheduling the preconstruction
meeting.
ifx. By execution of this Agreement, the District does not guarantee water service
will be provided to realty described herein. In the event that any of the District's facilities,
such as storage tanks, wells, and water transmission mains become utilized beyond their
design or approved capacity or become inoperable for any cause, the District reserves the right
to refuse any connections which would use such facility until remedial action has been
completed, and the District shall not be liable for any direct or consequential damages which
occur to the Developer arising out of such the District's refusal to connect or time delay
necessary to take remedial action.
17. The Developer and its agents agree to indemnify and hold the District harmless
from any and all claims which may be assessed against the District as a result of the
construction or maintenance of the work described in this Agreement prior to acceptance by
the District. The Developer shall maintain in full force and effect during the construction
period, the following insurance:
a. Commercial General Liability Insurance with bodily injury and property damage limits of
not less than:
$1,000,000.00 Each Occurrence
$2,000,000.00 General Aggregate
$2,000,000.00 Products -Completed Operations Aggregate Limit
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 4 of 8
b. Business Auto Liability coverage for all owned, non -owned, and hired autos with bodily
injury and property damage limits of not less than:
$1,000,000.00 Each Accident
A certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the Developer's Commercial
General Liability Insurance policy, showing the District as additional insured as respects the
work to be performed under this Agreement, shall be provided prior to scheduling the
preconstruction meeting. Thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the District for
cancellation or expiration of this insurance.
18. The Developer shall notify the District the date work and construction described
in this Agreement will commence, and said notice shall be given not less than 72 hours (not
including Saturday, Sunday, or national holidays) prior to such date. No water distribution
system facility shall be covered prior to inspection by the District. After work is commenced, it
shall vigorously, consistently, and in a first-class workmanlike manner be carried to
completion. The Developer shall maintain at the construction area at all times during
construction, a representative to whom District notices may be given regarding construction.
Said representative shall be designated in writing by the Developer before start of work. The
Developer may request inspections during construction upon two (2) days notice to the
District.
19. Testing of water system facilities shall be performed as required by the District
and only after satisfactory tests have been completed and witnessed by the District's
designated agent, will the work be accepted. The Developer agrees that at such time as the
District has performed inspection of the water distribution system facilities & system
connections and has delivered itemized punch lists to the Developer and/or the Developer's
contractor, that the project will be pursued to final completion, including the performance of all
necessary site restoration.
20. Upon completion of construction, the Developer or the Developer's contractor
shall deliver to the District a guarantee in the amount of ten percent (10%) of construction
costs or $5,000.00, whichever is greater, that a reliable contractor will make and pay for
repairs necessary within two (2) years from the date of acceptance of said construction, arising
from faulty labor or material. Form of guarantee is to be approved by general counsel for the
District. This requirement is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held
accountable for any such repairs. Should any defects be discovered within the specified 2-year
time period, Developer will be notified and given ample time to correct same. If defects are
not corrected within the specified time, Lakehaven will perform the work and issue an invoice
to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid within thirty (30) days of issue date. This
paragraph shall be valid beyond the release of this Agreement and until the District closes out
the associated project account.
21. Upon completion of construction, the Developer shall submit, for acceptance and
approval of the District, Bills of Sale for water distribution system facilities, mains and
appurtenances installed and constructed pursuant to this Agreement, in a form acceptable to
the District, together with such other engineering records and project cost data as may be
required by the District.
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 5 of 8
22. As a condition of District acceptance of the project, the Developer shall submit
to the District a non-refundable warranty inspection fee for water, as set forth in District
Resolution No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto, to be held by the District
and applied against actual expenses of the District incurred to complete warranty inspections
following the two-year warranty period.
23. In the event new or modified District easements are required over Developer's
property described herein, such easements, in form acceptable to the District, shall be
delivered to the District as a condition of & prior to the activation of any new or modified
service connections for the property.
24. In the event the Developer requests and the District provides water meters for
the realty described herein, prior to the District's acceptance of work, the Developer agrees to
be solely responsible for any loss or damage to such water meters or their installation, which
occurs prior to said acceptance of work by the District.
25. Work and construction performed under this Agreement shall not be connected
to the District's water distribution systems until all provisions and requirements of this
Agreement and District Resolutions, on the part of the Developer, have been fully complied
with.
26. The District and the Developer agree that in carrying out the terms of this
contract, the Developer shall be acting as an independent contractor and in no respect shall
Developer be deemed an agent or partner of the District.
27. The Developer shall not assign this contract without the written consent of the
District.
28. The District shall provide water service following the District's acceptance of the
water distribution facilities for operation and maintenance and upon payment of the connection
charges as set forth and in accordance with District Resolution No.2017-1300. Said
connection charges shall consist of the Capital Facilities Charge (CFC), Service &/or Meter
Installation Charge &/or Deposit, and any other such charges levied in accordance with said
District Resolution No. 2017-1300 or amendments thereto or any other applicable District
Resolution at time service is requested.
29. The parties agree that, if determined applicable by the District, the provision of
latecomer reimbursements for system facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement will be
handled by separate agreement to be executed between the parties within a reasonable time
following acceptance of the facilities and establishment of the appropriate latecomer
reimbursement area by the District's Board of Commissioners. Any applicable latecomer
reimbursement period will be limited to 15 years, or longer, pursuant to the provisions of state
law.
30. Partial waiver or waiver by acquiescence by the District of any provision or
condition of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other provision or condition of this
Agreement. -
31. This Agreement shall constitute an easement and servitude upon the property
described herein and shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors in interest to the
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 6 of 8
Developer. This Agreement shall constitute an equitable lien against property described herein
and in the event of nonperformance by the Developer, as stated herein, the District may
foreclose said lien in the manner authorized by law.
32. This writing constitutes the full and only agreement between the parties, there
being no promises, agreements or understandings, written or oral, except as herein set forth,
or as hereinafter may be amended in writing.
33. Upon execution of this Agreement, the parties agree in the event either of them
is required to enforce any provision or provisions of this Agreement against the other, that the
prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to all other amounts to which it is otherwise
entitled by this Agreement, to its actual attorney's fees and costs, including those incurred on
appeal.
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 7 of 8
WITNESS our hands and seals.
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
By
Its
Date:
State of
County of �L
LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
King County, Washington
De elopm t Engineering Manager
Dated: INN
This record was acknowledged before me on _ �t �, 2
(Date)
by as
Name) (Type of Authority, Title)
of�i(c.i �d S
(Company Na e)
rf4eXft
&aft of ���la�l�t r3to,a
� � dv
For recording in the State of
Washington, the Notarial Seal must be
fully legible and cannot intrude into
document margins. Please affix seal in
the space provided.
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17)
DATED: ZdALt&44,4 9) 2-0 1q
(Signatu 0
Nota[y Mblic
Title J
My appointment expires
Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
LESS THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH THREE -FOURTHS THEREOF;
LESS THE WEST 30 FEET;
LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET;
AND LESS THE SOUTH 30 FEET.
TAX PARCEL NO. 0821049035
EXHIBIT "B"
PROPERTY DEPICTION
860.3400010
8603400075
31248
31249
M-03400005
86034f 0080
31256
31257 j"
l�r
Nz
0821049035
625
16 000
020 ,
PL
�9416 0t
9416 00(
� 31604
S314M87-
�t��uuu Li
559fi 0 Q'13D�
001 713 r858000035
31249
8588000040
31255
85980 OL1045
31407
05080 0Q050
31415
85.880 00055
31423
85so'GaOO6.0 ju
31431
858�30 000 65 �
31439
S 315TH S7
ufl
85990 W070
31507
FeEt
f
9508000075
31513
7941500060
94150007 31610
858800ON
31521
31511
9588000085
7 41500050
1614
31529
ca
94150004
O 'J'I C']F,
8589000090
31605
1
SAMPLE INVOICE ONLY --DO NOT SUBMIT PAYMENT
LAt(EHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT Invoice Date: 3r"17
Invoice Projeca 631♦
0ne,des Mmi..Vh U2M lr} Due Date: 4r-V2017
Water SubTotal: $2,033.80
WastewaterSubTotal: $2,t179.14
Total Amount Due: $4,112 94
Online payments cannot be accepted
DEVELOPER NAME
COMPANY
ADDRESS
CITYSTAZIP
Project', Project Name
63 M
Project Cbarges:
31+Days Last 30 Days
LTD
Water:
$4,386.A6 S8.66
$4,395.12
Wastewater:
S5555 $8.91
55.554_43
Total:
s9,941M $17.57
$9.959.5fl:
Project Payments and Other Credhs: 31+Days
Water: (S2,36132)
Wastewater.. to
Total: ($5,846.61)
Last 30 Days LTD
$D_OD ($2:351.32)
SD.OD (55a845Z1)
Total: $4,112,94
Meludes accru-d ingest
churgas ofS1,327.97an
previous unrdbalance
For q sl osrs, please cast 25394_ or 9=1 us at I1111111111111111@1akehavenorg
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ansuro proper credit to your accounrpMaso deftch and return this portion with your payment
Water Arnount $127425
Neater Irt Charges- $759.55
Invoice Date: 332017
SewerAmount $1,3110.72
Serer Interest $768,42
Proj et#
Total Amount $4,112.94
Due Date: 4r"17
Please Pay: $4,112 94
Online payments cannot bs accepted
Please romit Payments to:
LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT
PO Box4249
Fed%W Way. WA 98063
TIN # 91-0874464
For propercmditng, please pay any utility service charges separately
SAMPLE INVOICE ONLY - DO NOT SUBMIT PAYMENT
LAKEHAVEN WATER 8r SEWER DISTRICT - DEVELOPER EXTENSION PROJECTS
Preliminary Estimate - Deposits, Fees and Charges (2018 Schedule)
Property Within the City of Federal Way 8.4% Imposed Excise Tax)
' = Includes C' rW Exciso Tax — = Sub oct to Additional Cf Fw Excise Tax
Project: MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - PO 18802268
Date: 10/23/18
Prepared by: BIA
Project No.: 6318021
DESCRIPTION
CURRENT
AMOUNT
J I ESTIMATED ESTIMATED
TIME PAID Water Amount Sewer Amount
DEVELOPER EXTENSIONS DE -MAINLINE)
'Developer Pre -Design Application
$500A0
Fee
With Application
$54200
Developer Extension Agreement Application
$2,000.00
4 ' ee
$1600
"Deposit
$2.033-6
'Charge(s) Payable in Lieu of Extension - Water
'Charge(s) Payable in Lieu of Extension - Sewer
'Oeveloper Latecomer Charge(s) - Water
'Developer Latecomer Charge(s) - Sewer
'Temporary Connection [Earlycomed Charge - Water
'Temporary Connection [Eartycomerj Charge - Sewer
Variable charge(s).
Project & property speck
Prior to scheduling
the
Preconstruction
Meeting
"DE Acceptance Guarantee - Water (Opfiarral ]
"DE Acceptance Guarantee - Sewer [OpfigRalj
$4,000 00 Deposit
$2.900.00
Waived for Public
Agencies
'DE Warranty Inspection - Water
'DE Warranty Inspection - Sewer
$330,00
$620.00 Fee
Prior to Project
Acceptance
$357.72
DEVELOPER
EXTENSION (OE -MAINLINE)
SU5TOTALS
$2.933.321
$0.00
SERVICE CONNECTIONS
er Service connMon Permit
S29000
Fee
Prior to Issuance
of Service
Connection Permil
$303.52
Water Meter Installation:
Developer Installed Service Connections with Lakehaven Installed Meter(s)
FIRE-PROTECTIQNI LOW -DETECTION per meter 5/8'
per meter 518" w/Meter Adapters
per meter 1'
per meter Vw/MeterAdapters
per meter I'A'
per meter I W w/M eter Adapters
PRELIM. DOMESTIC SIZE per meter 2"
per meter Y
PRELIM. DOMESTIC SIZE per meter 4'
$430.00
$460.00
$490.00
$710.00
$680.00
$1.030.00
$800.00
$2,380.00
$2,990.00
'Charge
S466.12
$888.3
$3,245,34
Water Service Connection Installation: Lakehaven Installed Servioes and Melere
per service connection 5/8'
per service connection V
per service connection 1'1W
per service connection 2-
per service connection 3'
per service connection 4-
per service connection 6'
r service connection 8'
$4,190,Do
S4,430.00
$5,350,00
$5,830.0D
$30,630.00
$33,620.00
$39,300.00
S454W,00
_Deposit
'Service Connection regiment s - Priv. PS. Tem . Servlre, etc.
$150.00
Charge(s)
'County Document Recording
Feels) Based on # of
P
'Right-of-way Construction Permit
C 4 of Fe&rat W
$170,00
Fee
'Capital FwAilies Charge: r Equivalent Ripidarift Unit - ERU
Water Lakehaven Service Area applications
Sewer: Lakehaven Service Area applicatiarts
Sewer: Mf Sewer District Service Area applications
$3,707.00
$3,509.00
$2,063.00
per ERU
emporary annectlon arlycamer rge • f:edleral Way CirlyMenter -Sewer
32,570.00
per ERU
ERU CALCULATION S
ERU amounts for Non -Residential domestic & irrigation service connections are determined by
Lakehaven using estimated domestic water usage figures provided by the owner/applicant.
One (1) ERU Is equivalent to an annual average of 24e gals/day of water usage and 210 gpd of
associated sewer discharge (from domestic only). All properties with service connections will
be responsible for any rental opacity charges for water usage and/or sewage discharge, as
applicable, that exceeds the respective water or sewer system capacity
purchased/credtted/albcated for the property for each billing cycle. The rate(s) for any such
excess water usage I sewage discharge will be as set by takehaven's Board of
Commissioners, and will be in addition to the standard base and volume charges.
SERVICE CONNECTIONS SUBTOTALS1
$4.579.781 $303.52
TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE: WATER
$7,513.10
TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE: SEWER
303.52
The above figures are estimates based upon the information available at
the time of preparation. Any change in project scope, requirements,
plumbing code revisions, etc., may render these estimates inaccurate.
Actual service connection charges shall be calculated at time application
for service connection is submitted. Fees and charges are typically
reviewed annually, and are subject to change without notice.
NOTES: All deposits are held against and applied to actual Lakehaven labor and material costs
associated with the project, including Lakehaven overhead, Actual costs for developer
extension (DE) projects / processing are dependent on the size and complexity of the
project, and there is no precise method of estimating total actual project All DE
project accounts will be analyzed regularly. Invoices are issued monthly, when
appropriate, with payment due as noted on the invoiGe(s) and the account must be
kept current to avoid suspension of project activities &/or other penalties.
Lakehaven
WATER & SEWER MSTRICI
Hydraulic Model Fire Flow Estimate
Request/Reporting Form
Requested By: Date:
Federal Way Public Schools 10/4/18
Location to be Modeled: Proposed Hydrants for Mirror Lake Elementary — With Modifications
Lakehaven '/4 Section Grid:
U8
Intersection:
S 315"' St & 6th Ave S
Add, Description:
See attached map Pressure Zone: 538
Results By:
John Bowm�
Date:
10/16/18
Model Run No.:
Master Water System Model 2007.net
FF #345c
Condition
Pressure (psi)
Flow (gpm)
Static
36
0
Fire Flow
20
3300
NOTES:
Lakehaven's adopted level of service goals for fire flow rates are 1000 gpm within single
family residential areas (including duplexes) and 2500 gpm for multi -family, commercial,
industrial areas.
Model results depict the theoretical performance of the water system under high demand
conditions and are not guaranteed to represent actual system performance. A design
professional should be consulted for site specific design purposes.
The calculated fire flow capacity in the above table is based on a currently available residual
system pressure of 20 psi at the location modeled. The model indicates that Lakehaven's
standard maximum allowable velocity of 10 ft/s (for existing pipes) is exceeded at a fire
flow rate above 2800 gpm. Fire flow capacities greater than 2800 gpm may be
accommodated through water system improvements.
101618FF 345c - Mirror Lake (Form Update 1/6/17)
Lakehaven
tDE VELOPER EXTENSIOND - • -
Project Name: MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY Project No.: 6318021
SCHOOL - PO 18802267
Project Tech.:
BIA
Updated. 10 23 2018
Notes:
A.
Any/all requests for modifications to Lakehaven's standards, specifications, policies &/or
resolutions shall be made in writing (Plan Review Checklist comment, email, or letter) to
Lakehaven.
B.
IFees, charges &/or deposits indicated are based on current Lakehaven schedule, are typically
reviewed annuall , & are subject to change without notice.
S
PRIOR TO C0NSTRUCTION
1
DE Agreement Application & Deposit.
2
DE Agreement executed by Developer. Agreement expires 1015123.
3
Water Plan(s) Approval by Lakehaven.
4
N/A
AppFayal by Lakehaven.
5
AutoCAD Files.
6
As -built Consultant's Guarantee Letter.
7
As -built Consultant's Certificate of Insurance (Errors & Omissions).
8
As -built Consultant's Certificate of Insurance (General Liability).
9
N/A
10
N A
11
ROW Permit - Water.
12
N/A
wPefitSewer.
13
N/A
E)ff site Easement(s) Water�
14
N/A
Off -site Easernerit(s
15
WAIVED
Restoration Guarantee - ROW &/or Off -site Easement(s).
16
Material Submittals.
17
Developer's Certificate of Insurance (General & Business Auto Liability).
18
Water/Sewer Utility Contractor Information.
19
IDE
Preconstruction Meeting.
PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION
20
Substantial Completion Request by Developer.
21
Operational Inspection(s) - Water.
22
N/A
.
23
Construction Record Drawings & AutoCAD Files - Water
24
N/A
L4
f�TCS,T�GRLT-! 1fCJ Sewe
Ge Ar rtm b_c�.ceFel, ram. o n. GAF) Files S
25
WAIVED
Warranty (2-year) Guarantee.
26
Bill of Sale - Water.
27
N/A
Bull of Sale Sewer.
28
N/A
Gtff F Related nF, eet Lest _1ri fer alien.
29
On -site Easement.
30
WAIVED
DE Acceptance Guarantee(s).
31
WAIVED
SubCompl Guarantee.
32
SubCompl Agreement executed by Developer.
Project Checklist-6318021.xlsx (Form Update 09-01-17) Page 1 of 8
Lakehaven
PEVELOPER EXTENSIONi9 �.I
Project Name: MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL - PO 18802267 Project No.: 6318021
Project Tech.:
BIA 7
Updated: 10 23 2018
Notes:
A.
Any/all requests for modifications to Lakehaven's standards, specifications, policies &/or
resolutions shall be made in writing (Plan Review Checklist comment, email, or letter) to
Lakehaven.
B.
Fees, charges &/or deposits indicated are based on current Lakehaven schedule, are typically
reviewed annually, & are suWect to change without notice.
s
PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY LAKEHAVEN
33
N/A
bate eigger ,ngFeement ProV
34
Acceptance Inspection(s) - Water.
35
N/A
Aceeptanee`ligspeetieflEs_, S__ ef.
36
ROW Permit Release - Water.
37
N/A
eWPermT1=Release Sewer
38
N/A
Off site Easement R..stOFatiOn Reiease(s)
39
N/A
Recorded Rnal PlaVBSPJBiA-.
40
1
DE Warranty Inspection Fee(s).
PRIOR TO PR03ECT ACCOUNT INITIAL CLOSEOUT
41
Final DE Project Invoice or Refund.
PRIOR TO FINAL PR03ECT CLOSEOUT AFTER 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD
42
Warranty Inspection - Water.
43
N/A
Project Checklist-6318021.xlsx (Form Update 09-01-17) Page 2 of 8
4Lakehaven
t.. WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
a • ' J o-- -- -
ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
RECORDED FINAL PLAT/BSP/BLA. Copy of the recorded final plat/BSP/BLA.
39
Proposed/preliminary final plat/BSP/BLA documents should be submitted to Lakehaven for
review as part of the Substantial Completion process summarized above, to be certain easement
requirements are satisfactorily addressed.
40
DE WARRANTY INSPECTION FEE(S). Payment of the applicable DE Warranty Inspection Fees:
Water $330.00 [2017], Sewer = $610.00 [2017].
PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCOUNT INITIAL CLOSEOUT
41TFINAL
DE PROJECT INVOICE OR REFUND. Payment by Developer of the final DE project
voice or final project Refund by Lakehaven, whichever is applicable.
PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT AFTER 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD
WARRANTY INSPECTION - WATER. Satisfactory "Warranty" inspection of the water facilities
42
constructed for the project, including correction of all defects noted during the "Warranty"
inspection. If provided notice of any items requiring correction, please contact Lakehaven's
assigned project technician, NAME (EMAIL@ Lakehaven.org), to coordinate re -inspection.
WARRANTY INSPECTION - SEWER. Satisfactory "Warranty" inspection of the sewer facilities
43
constructed for the project, including correction of all defects noted during the "Warranty"
inspection. If provided notice of any items requiring correction, please contact Lakehaven's
assigned project technician, NAME (EMAIL@ Lakehaven.org), to coordinate re -inspection.
Project Checklist-6318021.x1sx (09-01-17)
Lakehaven
WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
DEVELOPER1PROJECT
ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
1
DE AGREEMENT APPLICATION & DEPOSIT. Submitted by Developer as the initial step in
Lakehaven's DE Agreement process.
DE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY DEVELOPER. Developer has executed (i.e., signed with
Z
notary) & returned the DE Agreement to Lakehaven. Execution and return of the DE Agreement
within 30 days is required or the project will be suspended without further notice, and for all
Lakehaven plan review tasks/services beyond an initial review.
WATER PLAN(S) APPROVAL BY LAKEHAVEN. Execution and return of the DE Agr is required
3
for all Lakehaven plan review tasks/services beyond an initial review. Plan approval expires
M D YY if construction has not commenced by that date, or M D YY if construction was
commenced prior to M D . (Paragraph No. #)
SEWER PLAN(S) APPROVAL BY LAKEHAVEN. Execution and return of the DE Agr is required
for all Lakehaven plan review tasks/services beyond an initial review. Plan approval expires
4
M D YY if construction has not commenced by approval date, or M D YY if construction was
commenced prior to M D YY. (Paragraph No. #)
5
AUTOCAD FILES. All related AutoCAD files submitted to Lakehaven. (Paragraph No. #)
AS -BUILT CONSULTANT'S GUARANTEE LETTER. Letter from the engineer/surveyor who will
6
be preparing the construction record drawings ("as-builts") for the project following construction,
confirming that accurate data will be collected in the field by the engineer/surveyor or
employee(s) under his/her supervision. (Paragraph No. #)
AS -BUILT CONSULTANT'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (ERRORS & OMISSIONS).
Coverage for General Liability ($1M each claim/$1M aggregate). Lakehaven shall be identified as
7
the "Certificate Holder" and included as additional insured. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven
project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. (Paragraph No. #)
AS -BUILT CONSULTANT'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (GENERAL LIABILITY). Coverage
for Errors and Omissions ($1M each claim/$1M aggregate). It would be helpful if the Lakehaven
8
project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. It would be helpful if
the Lakehaven project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate.
(Paragraph No. #)
CHARGE -PAYABLE -IN -LIEU -OF -EXTENSION PAYMENT(S)-WATER. Payment in the amount
of $XX,YYY.ZZ for water facilities previously constructed by a publicly -funded project that
provides direct benefit to Developer's property. (Paragraph #)
9
CHARGE -PAYABLE -IN -LIEU -OF -EXTENSION PAYMENT(S)-SEWER. Payment in the amount
of $XX,YYY.ZZ for sewer facilities previously constructed by a publicly -funded project that
provides direct benefit to Developer's property. (Paragraph #)
DEVELOPER LATECOMER CHARGE PAYMENT(S)-WATER. Payment in the amount of
$XX,YYY.ZZ for water facilities previously constructed by a developer -funded project that
10
Provides direct benefit to Developer's property. (Paragraph #)
DEVELOPER LATECOMER CHARGE PAYMENT(S)-SEWER. Payment in the amount of
$XX,YYY.ZZ for sewer facilities previously constructed by a developer -funded project that
provides direct benefit to Developer's property. (Paragraph #)
Project Checklist-6318021.x1sx (09-01-17)
40 Lakehaven
DEVELOPER !PROJECT
ITEM
PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
ROW PERMIT -WATER. Lakehaven receipt of the AGENCY ROW Permit required for water
11
facilities to be constructed for the project. Lakehaven will apply for this permit after water plans
have been approved. (Paragraph #)
ROW PERMIT -SEWER. Lakehaven receipt of the AGENCY ROW Permit required for sewer
12
facilities to be constructed for the project. Lakehaven will apply for this permit after sewer plans
have been approved. (Paragraph #)
13
OFFSITE EASE MENT(S)-WATER. Lakehaven receipt of the executed offsite easement(s)
required for water facilities to be constructed for the project. (Paragraph #)
14
OFFSITE EASEMENT(S)-SEWER. Lakehaven receipt of the executed offsite easement(s)
required for sewer facilities to be constructed for the project. (Paragraph #)
RESTORATION GUARANTEE. Lakehaven receipt of the Restoration Guarantee required for
water &/or sewer facilities to be constructed for the project, in the amount of $X,XXX.00, on
15
Lakehaven approved bond form. Amount is determined by Lakehaven after receipt of all required
ROW Permits &/or offsite easements. Assignment of Funds or cash deposit is also acceptable.
(Paragraph #)
MATERIAL SUBMITTALS. Two (2) sets of material (shop/working) drawings, submitted as one
16
package, bound & indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment & material to be furnished
for the project. (Paragraph #)
DEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE. Coverage for Commercial General Liability
($1M each occurrence/$2M general aggregate/$2M products) & Business Auto Liability ($1M
17
each accident; all owned, non -owned & hired autos). Lakehaven shall be identified as the
"Certificate Holder" and included as additional insured. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven
project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. (Paragraph No. #)
WATER/SEWER UTILITY CONTRACTOR INFORMATION. Lakehaven receipt of the
1s
contractor's address, email address, phone number, emergency phone number, and the name of
the contractor's foreman or superintendent; including proof of current/valid state contractor
license. (Paragraph #)
DE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. Separate Lakehaven preconstruction meeting, to review
19
the water &/or sewer construction plans for the project, with Lakehaven Inspections staff.
Lakehaven DE meetings are typically held on either the 2nd or 4th Thursday of each month, at
either 9:00 a.m. or 10:00 a.m. (Paragraph #)
Project Checklist-6318021.x1sx (09-01-17)
Lakehaven
ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
WARRANTY (2-YEAR) GUARANTEE. Warranty Guarantee on Lakehaven approved bond form.
The amount of the guarantee shall be ten percent (10%) of the cost of water/sewer construction
25 or $5,000.00, whichever is greater. This bond should be executed jointly for water and sewer (if
applicable) —separate bonds are subject to the aforestated $5,000.00 minimum. You may
execute an Assignment of Funds in lieu of the actual bond. Please contact Lakehaven for the
proper form, should you choose to utilize this option. A cash deposit is also acceptable.
BILL OF SALE - WATER. Bill of Sale for Water Facilities on Lakehaven approved form. Exhibit
"A" of the form is a new facility inventory report, Exhibit "B" is a 'de -activated' facility inventory
26 report. Back-up invoices must be included in order for this form to be valid & the figures included
in any Latecomers that may be applicable as a result of the project. If back up is not included,
this form will not be valid & Latecomer reimbursement amounts will not be calculated or
collected by Lakehaven.
BILL OF SALE - SEWER. Bill of Sale for Sewer Facilities on Lakehaven approved form. Exhibit
"A" of the form is a new facility inventory report, Exhibit "B" is a 'de -activated' facility inventory
27 report. Back-up invoices must be included in order for this form to be valid & the figures included
in any Latecomers that may be applicable as a result of the project. If back up is not included,
this form will not be valid & Latecomer reimbursement amounts will not be calculated or
collected by Lakehaven.
OTHER RELATED PROJECT COST INFORMATION. Other project cost information related to
28 the project but not directly associated with any Water &/or Sewer system facilities construction
(e.g., easement acquisition costs, facilities/pipe removal costs, etc.), submitted by separate
report/letter to Lakehaven.
ONSITE EASEMENT. On -site easements for Water &/or Sewer facilities constructed for the
project. The on -site easement descriptions will need to be verified against the "as -built"
locations. Please have your engineer or surveyor prepare/compile legal descriptions and graphic
depictions of the off -site property and easement areas, using a minimum one inch (1"), clear
margin on all sides. Newly created descriptions must be stamped and signed by a professional
land surveyor with registration in the State of Washington. Also, please provide 81/2" x 11"
29 drawings that graphically depict the easements for the facilities. The legal property descriptions
should be labeled as Exhibit "A", the easement area descriptions as Exhibit "B", and the drawings
should be labeled as Exhibit "C." We will forward the easement forms for execution when said
descriptions/depictions have been approved. IF APPLICABLE, Lakehaven will accept easement
dedication on the final plat/BSP/BLA documents, in lieu of separate on -site easement
dedication(s). We will require a copy of the recorded final plat/BSP/BLA prior to initial project
acceptance, if easements are so dedicated. Please submit the proposed/preliminary final
plat/BSP/BLA documents to Lakehaven for review, when available.
DE ACCEPTANCE GUARANTEE. Payment of the DE Acceptance Guarantee Deposit(s), as
30 applicable: $4,100.00 [2017] for Water, $3,200.00 [2017] for sewer. Only required if Substantial
Completion requested by Developer.
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION GUARANTEE. Payment of the Substantial Completion Guarantee
31 Deposit (Assignment of Funds or cash deposit) of $TBD-by-Lakehaven. Only required if
Substantial Completion requested by Developer.
Project Checklist-6318021.x1sx (09-01-17)
Lakehaven
WATER & SEWER DFSTRTCr
DEVELOPER EXTENSION (DE) PROJECT CHECKLIST
ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
7-
PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION (IF REQUESTED BY DEVELOPER)
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION REQUEST BY DEVELOPER. Developer written request (email or
20
letter) for Lakehaven Substantial Completion status.
OPERATION INSPECTION - WATER. Satisfactory operational inspection of the water facilities
constructed for the project, including satisfactory results of pressure and purity (bacteriological)
21
tests. Please contact Lakehaven's assigned project inspector directly (NAME, PHONE#), for
coordination of this task.
OPERATION INSPECTION - SEWER. Satisfactory operational inspection of the sewer facilities
constructed for the project, including satisfactory results of pipe pressure tests, manhole vacuum
22
tests and video camera inspection. Please contact Lakehaven's assigned project inspector
directly (NAME, PHONE#), for coordination of this task.
CONSTRUCTION RECORD DRAWINGS & AUTOCAD FILES - WATER. The original Mylar
Water construction record drawings, which have been conformed to construction records. These
record drawings must be certified "as -built" by a surveyor or engineer licensed in the State of
Washington. The project engineer should first submit prints of said plans for Lakehaven review,
along with Exhibit "A" of the Bill of Sale document(s). The originals may be submitted as soon
as the prints are acceptable. Water-soluble ink and/or reverse -read drawings are not
acceptable. All related AutoCAD files shall also be provided for our records. The AutoCAD dwg
23
format files need to include any cross-referenced or x-referenced files; any font files (e.g., shp,
shx, ttf, or txt); any plot style or configuration files (e.g., ctb, pc3, or stb); and other files
referenced in any of the drawing files (e.g., lin or pat) associated with the project. It is preferred
that x-referenced files be bound to the referencing drawing file, and the drawing file(s) be clearly
identifiable by name (e.g., project name &/or number (W_AsBuilt_01of07.dwg)) or similar
naming convention, whether each plot sheet is assigned its own drawing file or all the finished
plots are layouts in a single drawing file.
CONSTRUCTION RECORD DRAWINGS & AUTOCAD FILES - SEWER. The original Mylar
Sewer construction record drawings, which have been conformed to construction records. These
record drawings must be certified "as -built" by a surveyor or engineer licensed in the State of
Washington. The project engineer should first submit prints of said plans for Lakehaven review,
along with Exhibit "A" of the Bill of Sale document(s). The originals may be submitted as soon
as the prints are acceptable. Lakehaven will accept the initial submittal of sewer record drawings
that are absent of final manhole rim elevations on paper media, but final manhole rim elevations
shall be provided on new Mylar record drawings prior to initial project acceptance. Water-soluble
24
ink and/or reverse -read drawings are not acceptable. All related AutoCAD files shall also be
provided for our records. The AutoCAD dwg format files need to include any cross-referenced or
x-referenced files; any font files (e.g., shp, shx, ttf, or txt); any plot style or configuration files
(e.g., ctb, pc3, or stb); and other files referenced in any of the drawing files (e.g., lin or pat)
associated with the project. It is preferred that x-referenced files be bound to the referencing
drawing file, and the drawing file(s) be clearly identifiable by name (e.g., project name &/or
number (S_AsBuilt_01of07.dwg)) or similar naming convention, whether each plot sheet is
assigned its own drawing file or all the finished plots are layouts in a single drawing file.
Project Checklist-6318021.x1sx (09-01-17)
Lakehaven
DEVELOPER rPROJECT
ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
#
WARRANTY (2-YEAR) GUARANTEE. Warranty Guarantee on Lakehaven approved bond form.
The amount of the guarantee shall be ten percent (10%) of the cost of water/sewer construction
25
or $5,000.00, whichever is greater. This bond should be executed jointly for water and sewer (if
applicable) —separate bonds are subject to the aforestated $5,000.00 minimum. You may
execute an Assignment of Funds in lieu of the actual bond. Please contact Lakehaven for the
proper form, should you choose to utilize this option. A cash deposit is also acceptable.
BILL OF SALE - WATER. Bill of Sale for Water Facilities on Lakehaven approved form. Exhibit
"A" of the form is a new facility inventory report, Exhibit "B" is a 'de -activated' facility inventory
26
report. Back-up invoices must be included in order for this form to be valid & the figures included
in any Latecomers that may be applicable as a result of the project. If back up is not included,
this form will not be valid & Latecomer reimbursement amounts will not be calculated or
collected by Lakehaven.
BILL OF SALE - SEWER. Bill of Sale for Sewer Facilities on Lakehaven approved form. Exhibit
"A" of the form is a new facility inventory report, Exhibit "B" is a 'de -activated' facility inventory
27
report. Back-up invoices must be included in order for this form to be valid & the figures included
in any Latecomers that may be applicable as a result of the project. If back up is not included,
this form will not be valid & Latecomer reimbursement amounts will not be calculated or
collected by Lakehaven.
OTHER RELATED PROJECT COST INFORMATION. Other project cost information related to
28
the project but not directly associated with any Water &/or Sewer system facilities construction
(e.g., easement acquisition costs, facilities/pipe removal costs, etc.), submitted by separate
report/letter to Lakehaven.
ONSITE EASEMENT. On -site easements for Water &/or Sewer facilities constructed for the
project. The on -site easement descriptions will need to be verified against the "as -built"
locations. Please have your engineer or surveyor prepare/compile legal descriptions and graphic
depictions of the off -site property and easement areas, using a minimum one inch (1"), clear
margin on all sides. Newly created descriptions must be stamped and signed by a professional
land surveyor with registration in the State of Washington. Also, please provide 81/2" x 11"
Z9
drawings that graphically depict the easements for the facilities. The legal property descriptions
should be labeled as Exhibit "A", the easement area descriptions as Exhibit "B", and the drawings
should be labeled as Exhibit "C." We will forward the easement forms for execution when said
descriptions/depictions have been approved. IF APPLICABLE, Lakehaven will accept easement
dedication on the final plat/BSP/BLA documents, in lieu of separate on -site easement
dedication(s). We will require a copy of the recorded final plat/BSP/BLA prior to initial project
acceptance, if easements are so dedicated. Please submit the proposed/preliminary final
plat/BSP/BLA documents to Lakehaven for review, when available.
DE ACCEPTANCE GUARANTEE. Payment of the DE Acceptance Guarantee Deposit(s), as
30
applicable: $4,100.00 [2017] for Water, $3,200.00 [2017] for sewer. Only required if Substantial
Completion requested by Developer.
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION GUARANTEE. Payment of the Substantial Completion Guarantee
31
Deposit (Assignment of Funds or cash deposit) of $TBD-by-Lakehaven. Only required if
Substantial Completion requested by Developer.
Project Checklist-6318021.xisx (09-01-17)
Lakehaven
ITEM
PR03ECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
ROW PERMIT -WATER. Lakehaven receipt of the AGENCY ROW Permit required for water
11
facilities to be constructed for the project. Lakehaven will apply for this permit after water plans
have been approved. (Paragraph #)
ROW PERMIT -SEWER. Lakehaven receipt of the AGENCY ROW Permit required for sewer
12
facilities to be constructed for the project. Lakehaven will apply for this permit after sewer plans
have been approved. (Paragraph #)
13
OFFSITE EASE MENT(S)-WATER. Lakehaven receipt of the executed offsite easement(s)
required for water facilities to be constructed for the project. (Paragraph #)
14
OFFSITE EASE MENT(S)-SEWER. Lakehaven receipt of the executed offsite easement(s)
required for sewer facilities to be constructed for the project. (Paragraph #)
RESTORATION GUARANTEE. Lakehaven receipt of the Restoration Guarantee required for
water &/or sewer facilities to be constructed for the project, in the amount of $X,XXX.00, on
15
Lakehaven approved bond form. Amount is determined by Lakehaven after receipt of all required
ROW Permits &/or offsite easements. Assignment of Funds or cash deposit is also acceptable.
(Paragraph #)
MATERIAL SUBMITTALS. Two (2) sets of material (shop/working) drawings, submitted as one
16 package, bound & indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment & material to be furnished
for the project. (Paragraph !)
DEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE. Coverage for Commercial General Liability
($1M each occurrence/$2M general aggregate/$2M products) & Business Auto Liability ($1M
17 each accident; all owned, non -owned & hired autos). Lakehaven shall be identified as the
"Certificate
Holder" and included as additional insured. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven
project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. (Paragraph No. #)
WATER/SEWER UTILITY CONTRACTOR INFORMATION. Lakehaven receipt of the
18 contractor's address, email address, phone number, emergency phone number, and the name of
the
contractor's foreman or superintendent; including proof of current/valid state contractor
license. (Paragraph #)
DE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. Separate Lakehaven preconstruction meeting, to review
19 the water &/or sewer construction plans for the project, with Lakehaven Inspections staff.
Lakehaven DE meetings are typically held on either the 2nd or 4th Thursday of each month, at
either
9:00 a.m. or 10:00 a.m. (Paragraph #)
Project Checklist-6318021.x1sx (09-01-17)
Lak& SEWER ehave n
DEVELOPER,. WN
ITEM
PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY DEVELOPER. Execution (by
32
Developer) & return of the Substantial Completion Agreement that was forwarded by Lakehaven
on DATE.
PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE BY:LAKEHAVEN
LATECOMER AGREEMENT PROCESS - LATECOMER WAIVED PROPERTIES. If applicable,
identification of any properties deemed by Lakehaven to be eligible for latecomer
reimbursement, but for which Developer chooses to waive its right to latecomer reimbursement.
LATECOMER AGREEMENT PROCESS - LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR WATER ELIGIBLE
PROPERTIES. If applicable, legal descriptions of all properties that are benefited by the
construction of water facilities for the project. Descriptions shall be prepared on 81/2" x 11"
paper, with one inch (1"), clear margins on all sides, and shall be labeled as Exhibit "A." If
required, they shall then be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor with registration
in the State of Washington.
33
LATECOMER AGREEMENT PROCESS - LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR SEWER ELIGIBLE
PROPERTIES. If applicable, legal descriptions of all properties that are benefited by the
construction of sewer facilities for the project. Descriptions shall be prepared on 81/2" x 11"
paper, with one inch (1"), clear margins on all sides, and shall be labeled as Exhibit "A." If
required, they shall then be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor with registration
in the State of Washington.
LATECOMER AGREEMENT PROCESS - LATECOMER AGREEMENT. Execution and return of the
Latecomer Agreement by the Developer. Reimbursements are typically issued for each payment
received and are subject to a payment -processing fee in accordance with the fee established in
Lakehaven's current 'Fees and Charges' Resolution at the time of each reimbursement.
ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION - WATER. Satisfactory "Acceptance" inspection of the water
facilities constructed for the project. Please contact Lakehaven's assigned project inspector
34 directly (NAME, PHONE#), for coordination of completion of construction. If provided notice of
any items requiring correction (i.e., "punchlist"), please contact Lakehaven's assigned project
technician (NAME, EMAIL), to coordinate re -inspection.
ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION - SEWER. Satisfactory "Acceptance" inspection of the sewer
facilities constructed for the project. Please contact Lakehaven's assigned project inspector
35 directly (NAME, PHONE#), for coordination of completion of construction. If provided notice of
any items requiring correction (i.e., "punchlist"), please contact Lakehaven's assigned project
technician (NAME, EMAIL), to coordinate re -inspection.
ROW PERMIT RELEASE - WATER. Written notice received by Lakehaven from (ROW AGENCY),
36 indicating
satisfactory restoration of the ROW under their permit for water construction (No.
TBD).
ROW PERMIT RELEASE - SEWER. Written notice received by Lakehaven from (ROW AGENCY),
37 indicating satisfactory restoration of the ROW under their permit for sewer construction (No.
TBD).
OFF -SITE EASEMENT RESTORATION RELEASE(S). Written notice from the adjacent property
38 owner(s), indicating satisfactory restoration of their property (off -site easements) following
construction.
Project Checklist-6318021.xisx (09-01-17)
Lakehaven
ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS
#
RECORDED FINAL PLAT/BSP/BLA. Copy of the recorded final plat/BSP/BLA.
39
Proposed/preliminary final plat/BSP/BLA documents should be submitted to Lakehaven for
review as part of the Substantial Completion process summarized above, to be certain easement
reiQuirements are satisfactorilyaddressed.
40
DE WARRANTY INSPECTION FEE(S). Payment of the applicable DE Warranty Inspection Fees:
Water = $330.00 [20171, Sewer = $610.00 [2017].
PRIOR TO PR03ECT ACCOUNT INITIAL CLOSEOUT
41 FINAL DE PROJECT INVOICE OR REFUND. Payment by Developer of the final DE project
invoice or final project Refund by Lakehaven, whichever is applicable.
PRIOR TO FINAL PR03ECT CLOSEOUT AFTER 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD
WARRANTY INSPECTION - WATER. Satisfactory "Warranty" inspection of the water facilities
42
constructed for the project, including correction of all defects noted during the "Warranty"
inspection. If provided notice of any items requiring correction, please contact Lakehaven's
assigned project technician, NAME (EMAIL@ Lakehaven.org), to coordinate re -inspection.
WARRANTY INSPECTION - SEWER. Satisfactory "Warranty" inspection of the sewer facilities
43
constructed for the project, including correction of all defects noted during the "Warranty"
inspection. If provided notice of any items requiring correction, please contact Lakehaven's
assigned project technician, NAME (EMAIL@ Lakehaven.org), to coordinate re -inspection.
Project Checklist-6318021.x1sx (09-01-17)
4 ty Lakehaven
�Project Name: MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL - PO 18802267
Project No.:
6318021
Project Tech.: BIA
Updated:
10 23/2018
Notes:
Any/all requests for modifications to Lakehaven's standards, specifications, policies &/or
A. resolutions shall be made in writing (Plan Review Checklist comment, email, or letter) to
Lakehaven.
Fees, charges &/or deposits indicated are based on current Lakehaven schedule, are typically
B' reviewed annually, & are subject to chan e without notice.
PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY LAKEHAVEN
33 N/A
.
34
Acceptance Inspection(s) - Water.
35 N/A
weF.
36
ROW Permit Release - Water.
7 A
TLT.]Release GC9Pe'r7
38 N/A
1Gff- ReSt-Fati5H Rele. se(s-)L
asefnen
tue..
N/A_
n,.,,rpi .1 -;
.,E niaVzCnlQn39
.. •..vsfi
.. LEr
40
DE Warranty Inspection Fee(s).
PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCOUNT INITIAL CLOSEOUT
41
Final DE Project Invoice or Refund.
PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT AFTER 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD
42 lWarranty
Inspection - Water.
43 NIA
.
Project Checklist-6318021.x1sx (Form Update 09-01-17) Page 2 of 8
u
9
ra�r��rg
C&& $LtAlLffj r u. q 33)
N
]0 0 �
scale T=301
PALPESY LIDS/���
IX CUMDOUR 0000)
IX CIITTOUR
PROPoSED GGNrouR WIN)
�I PROPOSED GD LTR
®C8 LINE
SPOT ELEVATION
IFF]RO F➢1@® Rnm E-EVAION
EX BUILDING
�l/I/I Lb�N a PROPOSED BUILDING
COIICFErE PAVEYENT
HEAVY DUTY CONCRET
._.'._�._....., AspWLT(AC) PAVEUENT
NIM SURFACING
WEWEL
VEHIM CURB
CURB A40 GUTTER
E- PRE-SETTUNG CASHIIA D FILTER
GRAVEL DISPERSION TFSKH
a � LEVEL FADER
SHEEF Raw DISPEZsa
is DTHRTY SPALL DECWAGE PAD
APF� DRAIN
GM1 BASIN TPE T
f� GTaI BAD! 71'FF 2
r PGOTMG/SUFSTIRFACE DIEM
MOON PFE
n STORN GRAM ClEANOUT
g1CaO F X DRAIN CTFATIOUT
ramp caRm5011r
m— DU NWOUTS w/ scN BLOCK
Ezra Q-00 T
BOUATm
[•lE "OR"'
TLGH FITTINGS
wTATrZi SERVKZ UNES
wYi NERER
)oM S WE UNES
eF� SRJICE LINE
fkU SEIMM VADLT
FK SA COtINE.TION
WATER AVAILABILITY
AVAILABLE
2100 GPM
FLOWS
STATIC
33-42 PSI
PRESSURE
RESIDUAL
NOT
AVAILABLE
8" LOOP AND
RECOMMENDATION
BOOSTER
PUMP
IPA
cau�
days before you 69.
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
00
E T=
pry
® r�s
LL x 3
�a
ch ED
L.1 N
m W
LLI LU
LU
1-
LL
LU w
LL
LL
0�
pale T-15�18
.wb � ream
a BL: EVW
Che�ai by LIP
ReN4o-
s Rw a—w-
PAVING
AND
UTILITIES
G-300
MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — PO 18802268
Lakehaven Project No. 6318021
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into in duplicate between the LAKEHAVEN WATER AND
SEWER DISTRICT, King County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as "the District" and FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, hereinafter
referred to as "the Developer".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the District operates and maintains a water distribution system within its
boundaries which can serve property of the Developer, and
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to construct certain water mains and appurtenances
at its own cost to serve the Developer's property, for delivery to and operation by the District,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that:
1. The land for which domestic water service is requested and to which this
Agreement applies, is realty in King County, Washington, legally described in Exhibit "A" and
generally depicted in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
By executing this Agreement, the Developer represents and warrants that it is the owner of
record of the above -described property. If such representation of ownership is invalid, this
Agreement shall be void as to the portion of the property not owned by the Developer. The
Developer agrees that the District may require the Developer to furnish a title report for the
property at the Developer's expense.
2. All newly created legal descriptions shall be furnished by the Developer and shall
be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington.
Each newly created legal description shall be accompanied by a drawing that graphically
depicts the legal description.
3. The Developer has paid the required deposit as set forth in District Resolution
No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto. Said deposit shall be applied against
actual expenses of the District, including all bacteriological testing and sampling. The District
shall determine, on a regular basis, its actual costs associated with the project, including taxes,
and shall submit to the Developer an invoice to repay the District for actual costs in excess of
the amount previously collected. Payment shall be due as noted on said invoice. Off -hours
labor, including overhead, costs for such inspections will be charged to the project on an
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 1 of 8
overtime basis. The Developer agrees that the project account shall remain current for the life
of the project and delinquency of any kind shall induce work stop action/orders,
suspension/termination of service or any other action necessary to effect collection of monies
owed the District. In the event monies are owed the District for work on, or unpaid charges
allocated to, the project, as determined by the District, Developer agrees that the District shall
be entitled to recover such monies by withholding and making application for payment to itself,
any assignment of funds, cash deposits or latecomer reimbursements otherwise owing to the
Developer. In the event that the deposit exceeds the District's actual expenses, the District
shall issue to the Developer, at project closing, a refund of such unused amounts.
4. Except as noted herein, all work conducted by the District will be performed
during normal work hours. The Developer may, at their discretion, submit a written request to
the District for District non-exempt staff to expend overtime for tasks and services related to
the completion of this Agreement. Said written request(s) shall state the Developer's reasons
for the request(s) that would qualify it as an "emergency" (e.g., "excessive" additional
expenses for any delays in plan review (actual/estimated figures should be provided),
approaching unfavorable weather conditions for construction, permit expirations, etc.). Each
written request submitted to the District for this purpose should also specify any component
limitations the Developer desires (e.g., request for plan review/approval, request for
construction inspections, etc.).
S. In the event work and construction described herein is not completed within five
(5) years from the date of application for this Agreement, said application date being OCTOBER
5, 2018, the District can terminate the Agreement without notice, the Agreement shall then be
void, and a new Developer Extension Agreement Application, along with applicable fee, will be
required to re -commence and subsequently complete said work.
6. It is agreed by the parties that time is of the essence in all matters relating to
the performance of this Agreement.
7. The Developer agrees that all requests for modification to District standards,
specifications, policies or Resolution shall be submitted in writing to the District. Such requests
shall be reviewed and the District will provide a written response to each submitted written
request.
S. The District shall review final plans and specifications for water distribution
system construction to be performed by the Developer under this Agreement. If preliminary
plans are not deemed acceptable by the District, the Developer shall be obligated to revise the
plans and specifications in accordance with design standards deemed acceptable by the
District. In the event that more than three (3) items are found to remain deficient by the
District on the third submittal of plans, subsequent review by District staff may be billed at a
factor of 1.5 times the standard rate without further notice to the Developer. The Developer
shall submit final plans for construction in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment),
and on standard print media (24"06" or 22"04" size), prior to scheduling the preconstruction
meeting. After the Developer has been notified in writing by the District that final plans and
specifications have been approved, and all other necessary items have been addressed and
resolved, the Developer and the Developer's contractor shall meet with the District's
representatives for a preconstruction meeting before construction is commenced.
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 2 of 8
9. The Developer agrees that it shall be responsible for providing to the District
accurate and reliable information concerning the actual location of the facilities constructed. In
furtherance of this obligation, the Developer shall procure from LPE ENGINEERING PLLC, or
other licensed engineer or surveyor that the Developer has indicated will be consulting on the
construction phase of the project, a written statement, which shall be submitted to the District
prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, stating that accurate data will be collected
during construction of the facilities to enable the engineer/surveyor to submit actual and
reliable "as -built" locations to the District, based upon the information available to the
engineer/surveyor during construction and also by field survey of the constructed facilities that
are accessible at the ground surface. The Developer shall cause such engineer/surveyor to
submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, a certificate of
insurance for the engineer's/surveyor's Errors and Omissions policy. The Developer shall also
cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction
meeting, a certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the engineer's/surveyor's
General Liability policy, naming the District as an additional insured as respects the obligations
set forth in this section. The limits for Errors and Omissions and General Liability Insurance
shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 for each claim; $1,000,000.00 aggregate. At the
conclusion of construction and prior to and as a condition of acceptance, the engineer/surveyor
shall deliver to the District its certification that it has made periodic field investigations and
measurements during construction and that the "as -built" drawings submitted to the District,
which drawings shall be provided in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment) and on
original or fixed -line photo mylar, are accurate and reliable. The District shall have the right to
approve any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor during the project and the
Developer agrees that the District may refuse any change in the consulting engineer or
surveyor or may condition the same on resubmittal of the certification of location described
above. No approval of any new engineer or surveyor shall be unreasonably withheld by the
District.
10. The District will make application for the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 'Right-of-way
Construction Permit(s)'. The Developer acknowledges familiarity with the provisions of such
Right-of-way Construction Permit(s) and agrees that it or its contractor's failure to comply with
any of the provisions of the permit(s) shall entitle the District, in addition to the right to
enforce any other remedy available to the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY as the permitting party, to
immediately stop all construction activity on the right-of-way until the violation or violations
have been eliminated and corrected to the satisfaction of the District and the District should
not be held liable for any damages, either direct or indirect, for the delay and expense of such
work stoppage. The Developer shall procure all other state, county and city licenses or
permits.
11. The Developer agrees this Agreement shall create twenty -foot (20') wide
[pipe(s) offset five -feet (5') from nearest margin] non-exclusive easement areas and right-of-
way granted to the District For water distribution facilities and all appurtenances related
thereto, as indicated on water facility construction plans approved by the District for the
project, respectively, through, over and across the Developer's property. This easement shall
be maintained in full force and effect unless superseded and replaced by another easement as
determined acceptable by the District.
12. In the event an easement is required over realty other than realty described in
Paragraphs No. 1 & No. 11 herein, such easement, in form acceptable to the District, together
with title report or other sufficient proof of ownership of such realty, shall be delivered to the
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 3 of 8
District prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. The Developer shall be obligated to
obtain a written release from any property owner across whose property construction is
performed pursuant to the grant of an easement, sufficient to indicate that the site restoration
on the easement is satisfactory and complete.
13. Prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, the Developer shall deliver to
the District a restoration performance bond in a sum to be determined by the District after
receipt of any required Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and/or after the determination of
off -site restoration requirements related to the work described herein, conditioned that the
Developer will restore to the satisfaction of the District, and state, county, and city agencies as
applicable, all work to be performed hereunder in public rights -of -way and the District's
easements. Form and contents of bond shall be determined by the District. This requirement
is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held accountable for any such
restoration. Should any restoration work be determined necessary, Developer will be notified
to complete the restoration work. If such work is not corrected within the specified time, the
District will perform the work and issue an invoice to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid
within thirty (30) days of issue date.
14. Construction shall be performed in accordance with the District's approved
plans, standards and specifications and only under the supervision of a licensed contractor
experienced in the installation of water distribution system facilities and the related work.
15. Two (2) sets of materials submittals shall be submitted to the District as one
package, bound and indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment/material to be
furnished for this project. Each submitted piece of equipment/material shall be fully defined by
catalog number and reference made as to its applicable section of the District's standard
specifications. Materials submittals shall be submitted prior to scheduling the preconstruction
meeting.
16. By execution of this Agreement, the District does not guarantee water service
will be provided to realty described herein. In the event that any of the District's facilities,
such as storage tanks, wells, and water transmission mains become utilized beyond their
design or approved capacity or become inoperable for any cause, the District reserves the right
to refuse any connections which would use such facility until remedial action has been
completed, and the District shall not be liable for any direct or consequential damages which
occur to the Developer arising out of such the District's refusal to connect or time delay
necessary to take remedial action.
17. The Developer and its agents agree to indemnify and hold the District harmless
from any and all claims which may be assessed against the District as a result of the
construction or maintenance of the work described in this Agreement prior to acceptance by
the District. The Developer shall maintain in full force and effect during the construction
period, the following insurance:
Commercial General Liability Insurance with bodily injury and property damage limits of
not less than:
$1,000,000.00 Each Occurrence
$2,000,000.00 General Aggregate
$2,000,000.00 Products -Completed Operations Aggregate Limit
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 4 of 8
b. Business Auto Liability coverage for all owned, non -owned, and hired autos with bodily
injury and property damage limits of not less than:
$1,000,000.00 Each Accident
A certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the Developer's Commercial
General Liability Insurance policy, showing the District as additional insured as respects the
work to be performed under this Agreement, shall be provided prior to scheduling the
preconstruction meeting. Thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the District for
cancellation or expiration of this insurance.
18. The Developer shall notify the District the date work and construction described
in this Agreement will commence, and said notice shall be given not less than 72 hours (not
including Saturday, Sunday, or national holidays) prior to such date. No water distribution
system facility shall be covered prior to inspection by the District. After work is commenced, it
shall vigorously, consistently, and in a first-class workmanlike manner be carried to
completion. The Developer shall maintain at the construction area at all times during
construction, a representative to whom District notices may be given regarding construction.
Said representative shall be designated in writing by the Developer before start of work. The
Developer may request inspections during construction upon two (2) days notice to the
District.
19. Testing of water system facilities shall be performed as required by the District
and only after satisfactory tests have been completed and witnessed by the District's
designated agent, will the work be accepted. The Developer agrees that at such time as the
District has performed inspection of the water distribution system facilities & system
connections and has delivered itemized punch lists to the Developer and/or the Developer's
contractor, that the project will be pursued to final completion, including the performance of all
necessary site restoration.
20. Upon completion of construction, the Developer or the Developer's contractor
shall deliver to the District a guarantee in the amount of ten percent (10%) of construction
costs or $5,000.00, whichever is greater, that a reliable contractor will make and pay for
repairs necessary within two (2) years from the date of acceptance of said construction, arising
from faulty labor or material. Form of guarantee is to be approved by general counsel for the
District. This requirement is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held
accountable for any such repairs. Should any defects be discovered within the specified 2-year
time period, Developer will be notified and given ample time to correct same. If defects are
not corrected within the specified time, Lakehaven will perform the work and issue an invoice
to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid within thirty (30) days of issue date. This
paragraph shall be valid beyond the release of this Agreement and until the District closes out
the associated project account.
21. Upon completion of construction, the Developer shall submit, for acceptance and
approval of the District, Bills of Sale for water distribution system facilities, mains and
appurtenances installed and constructed pursuant to this Agreement, in a form acceptable to
the District, together with such other engineering records and project cost data as may be
required by the District.
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 5 of 8
22. As a condition of District acceptance of the project, the Developer shall submit
to the District a non-refundable warranty inspection fee for water, as set forth in District
Resolution No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto, to be held by the District
and applied against actual expenses of the District incurred to complete warranty inspections
following the two-year warranty period.
23. In the event new or modified District easements are required over Developer's
property described herein, such easements, in form acceptable to the District, shall be
delivered to the District as a condition of & prior to the activation of any new or modified
service connections for the property.
24. In the event the Developer requests and the District provides water meters for
the realty described herein, prior to the District's acceptance of work, the Developer agrees to
be solely responsible for any loss or damage to such water meters or their installation, which
occurs prior to said acceptance of work by the District.
25. Work and construction performed under this Agreement shall not be connected
to the District's water distribution systems until all provisions and requirements of this
Agreement and District Resolutions, on the part of the Developer, have been fully complied
with.
26. The District and the Developer agree that in carrying out the terms of this
contract, the Developer shall be acting as an independent contractor and in no respect shall
Developer be deemed an agent or partner of the District.
27. The Developer shall not assign this contract without the written consent of the
District.
28. The District shall provide water service following the District's acceptance of the
water distribution facilities for operation and maintenance and upon payment of the connection
charges as set forth and in accordance with District Resolution No. 2017-1300. Said
connection charges shall consist of the Capital Facilities Charge (CFC), Service &/or Meter
Installation Charge &/or Deposit, and any other such charges levied in accordance with said
District Resolution No. 2017-1300 or amendments thereto or any other applicable District
Resolution at time service is requested.
29. The parties agree that, if determined applicable by the District, the provision of
latecomer reimbursements for system facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement will be
handled by separate agreement to be executed between the parties within a reasonable time
following acceptance of the facilities and establishment of the appropriate latecomer
reimbursement area by the District's Board of Commissioners. Any applicable latecomer
reimbursement period will be limited to 15 years, or longer, pursuant to the provisions of state
law.
30. Partial waiver or waiver by acquiescence by the District of any provision or
condition of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other provision or condition of this
Agreement.
31. This Agreement shall constitute an easement and servitude upon the property
described herein and shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors in interest to the
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 6 of 8
Developer. This Agreement shall constitute an equitable lien against property described herein
and in the event of nonperformance by the Developer, as stated herein, the District may
foreclose said lien in the manner authorized by law.
32. This writing constitutes the full and only agreement between the parties, there
being no promises, agreements or understandings, written or oral, except as herein set forth,
or as hereinafter may be amended in writing.
33. Upon execution of this Agreement, the parties agree in the event either of them
is required to enforce any provision or provisions of this Agreement against the other, that the
prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to all other amounts to which it is otherwise
entitled by this Agreement, to its actual attorney's fees and costs, including those incurred on
appeal.
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 7 of 8
WITNESS our hands and seals.
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Its
Date: JLVWLA {5 2-1, 1
State of �V&SkLtjg4r: +-t
County of KL
LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT
King County, Washington
De/elopmght Engineering Manager
Dated: (2
This record was acknowledged before me on ja-Ab 9' 20
(bate)
by {Dt r tvb� Celt b� � � as Sze t�icZ�L'r�c� t�� —
Narne) (Type ofAuthority, Title)
(Company N a e)
chary Lucille Helbling
Notary Public
State of Washln®ton
My AppoWmrs Wres =8021
For recording in the State of
Washington, the Notarial Seal must be
fully legible and cannot intrude into
document margins. Please affix seal in
the space provided.
DATED: Ta 64-L Ugo 2V
(Signatu�
Nota P(iblic
Title
My appointment expires
o'�'l)t f 2-C 2-1
DE Agr-6318021.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 8 of 8
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL PROPERTY ❑ESCRI_PTION
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
LESS THE EAST 30 FEET OF THE NORTH THREE -FOURTHS THEREOF;
LESS THE WEST 30 FEET;
LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET;
AND LESS THE SOUTH 30 FEET.
TAX PARCEL NO. 0821049035
41
PROPERTY DEPICTION
II [8603400010 ^ 8603400075
31248 31249
8603400005 8603400080
31256 31257 h
f l
EXHIBIT "B"
u5buuuuulu
559600130•,
5 596001fl 713 8588000035
31249
85880 00040
7 F 1 31255
S 314TH Sr
8588000045
31407
8588000050
31415 fl
8588000055
v' 31423 I
w I
0821049035 858800006�O w
625 31431
� w
8588000065
31439
S 315TH S T
0 100 200 B588000070
31507
FEET
8508000075
31513
4160006 \ 7941500060 8588000080
620 94150007 31610/f 31521
� 31611
8588010085
S 396TH FLU-- 94160005 41500050 31529
3�6a8 ( 31614
7�J41600040
31604 8588000090
94150004 31605
n 0-i a"n