The URL can be used to link to this page

16-101238clrY OF .rAWA l. Federal Allay APPLICATION (NO(S): Project Name Property Address/Location Parcel Number(s) Project Description CITYWIDE CONCURRENCY TEST SUMMARY 16-101238-000-CN NWCC Center Plaza (Mod Pizza) 2104 S 320th Street, Federal Way, WA 092104-9271 Public Works Department Expand the existing bank with drive-thru to 3,000 SF restaurant 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003-6325 253-835-2700; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cityoffederalway.com Date: May 5, 2016 Based on the traffic distribution, intersections impacted by at least one or more evening peak hour trips were analyzed for meeting concurrency LOS standards (v/c less than 1.2 for signalized and 1.0 for unsignalized) consistent with the City of Federal Way Transportation Concurrency Management code as described in FWRC 19.90. Table 1 below shows a summary of the LOS analysis for the study intersections with V/C ratio above 0.60 at the anticipated build -out year. Where a performance measure does not apply to the entire intersection, the table shows the measure for the worst movement of the intersection. For all other study intersections and detailed LOS calculation, please contact the Public Works Traffic Division. Note: Any chap ges to the develo Pment proicct that rea uire additional review wilI be billed on an hourly basis. Table 1: Concurrency Level of Service (LOS) Intersection 2017 Background I LOS 2017 With Project LOS Conditions Standard ; Standard ID Zone North South Street East-West Street V/C Met? V/C Met? •451 i Pacific Hwy S ! 16 Av S --0.81_ _ - Y- -- ----- - — 0.8l _ _ 1050 Pacific Hwz S.________._ �:S 288 St _ --- _------ 0.85_- — - 1--- ---0 85_-- --- - -- - 1651 ` }Pacific Hwy S . �S Dash Point Rd 0.77 '< _ 0.77_— ; y _ 2051 —!Pacific Hwy S —_��- IS 304 St 0.69W- 2250 `` !Pacific Hn S IS 308 St _ — - 0.65 _ �' _ 0.66 2557 128 Av S _ IS 312 St 0.65— - _ V-___- 0.65 _ k- 3040 1 11 Av S S 320 St 0.68 ------------- k ---------••-- 0.68 ------------- 1 Y. - - ---- 3046 18 Av S f S 320 St 0.75 Y: 0.75 L Y w 3060 ! 32 Av S 320 St 0.62 Y _ 0 62 .6 __ __.__.___ }� -- _ T6613061 } ; We erhaeuser W S y r�S ! S 320 St ------------ 0.68 ---------- —68 a! :. - _— ..--.. - ^ -------_,__ 3 —�----+-_- ----- -sc -- _ 4050 } Pacific Hwy S - --- +--- ---. �_..._ _ ___...._____--____.__}___--- --------�- S 336 St --- ----- _ 0.98 ------- —0.82 __ --- 0 -98 0.83 µ }� V -4250 Pacific H S tS 340 St — Y� 4850 ! �16 Av SSR 4850 �...� ..— _. _ _�_ __.ti _ 18 _ ------F-------�_�. 0�95- =-- � 0.95 -- --0.95 - ___ --- E� � _ 1 5050 iEnchante_d_Pkwy S_ IS 352 St 0.69 -- 0.69 _ 5251 —!Enchanted Pkwy S jS 356 St 0.79 1' 0.79 I' All intersections met the City of Federal Way LOS standards: Yes Yes I tir Staff l sr f i)h Concurrency Test Result: Passed: Fail: If "Fail', identify intersections and possible mitigation: Concurrency Test performed by: Sarady Long Date L:\DEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\2016 CN Projects\16101238_Mod Pizza\Mod Pizza Concurrency LOS Summary 1/1 clty OF Public Works Department 33325 8th Avenue South Fe d e r r� l Way Federal Way WA 98835-2609�+ Q 253-835- w.ci; Fax 2eralwa .c o9 =- www.cityoffederalway.com CITY CENTER CONCURRENCY TEST SUMMARY APPLICATION (NO(S): 16-101238-000-CN Date: May 5, 2016 Project Name NWCC Center Plaza (Mod Pizza) Property Address/Location 2104 S 320th Street, Federal Way, WA Parcel Number(s) 092104-9271 Project Description Expand the existing bank with drive-thru to 3,000 SF restaurant Based on the traffic distribution, intersections impacted by at least one or more evening peak hour trips were analyzed for meeting concurrency LOS standards (v/c less than 1.1) consistent with the City of Federal Way Transportation Concurrency Management code as described in FWRC 19.90. Table 1 below shows a summary of the LOS analysis for the signalized study intersections at the anticipated build -out year. For all other study intersections and detailed LOS calculation, please contact the Public Works Traffic Division. Note: any changes to the development proiect that require additional review will be billed on an houriv basis. Table 1: City Center Zone Concurrency Level of Service (LOS) Intersection 2017 Background LOS 2017 With Project LOS Conditions Standard Conditions Standard ID `', Zone (North -South Street East-West Street V/C Met? V/C Met? 2549 CC 144-Av S --- -----_... ... iS 12 St - - -_ _- -- - - - 0.5-- - - -- - 0.50 -- - 2550 CC 'Pacific Hwy S S 312 St 0.75 0.75 2552 CC 120 Av S IS 312 St 0.39- 0.39 -- 2554 CC �123 Av S S 312 St 0.43 ----- -- 0.43 _-- 2652 i CC 20 Av S IS 314 St _ 0.36 ,- 0.36 2654-__t- - CC �.23 Av S - _-� I S 314 St 0.23 0.23 2750 I CC s Pacific Hwy S -� S 316 St 0.76 0.76 _ - -- ; --- - -r-- 2752 CC 20 Av S µY ...._- ' S 316 St 0.49 .. �_____ .. _ _---__-------..._ 0.49 -__.-..------------ 2754-� CC j 23 Av S -----T.. ' S 316 St ---- _ 0.34- -.^�._... _----� -w -- W - 0.34 --- :2855 I CC �23 Av_S� - S 317 St 0.61 �0.88 ---- - 0.88 3048C C 11 Pi S'-_ 3050 CC Hwy S =S 320 St 1S 320 St 0.81 - 0.81 iPacific 3052 CC `20 Av S S 320 St 0.75 ----- 0.78 - 3055 i CC 123 Av S IS 320 St 0.83-- 0.83 _ - 3056 CC -; Gatew� Blvd S _ _ ��- 0 St 0_68 1S 320 St 68 - 0�- 3057_-_CC ; [-5 SB_Ramp r ..__-__- j S 320 St 0.63 _ 0.63 --- 3255 T _ CC _123rd Ave S -- - :S 322nd St 0.2 zo 334 3348 r CC IIIPIS S I I I ------ S 324 St 0.25 �.....___----. , _. ___ _ -- ... 0.25 0.25 -- - --- ---- -T�C 13350 CC (Pacific Hwy S IS 324 St 0.83 0.83 CC Average v/c Ratio = 0.56 0.57 1 All signalized City Center intersections met LOS standards: Yes Yes For Stall Use Only. Concurrency Test Result: Passed: Fail: If "Fail", identify intersections and possible mitigation: Test performed by: Sarady Long Date L:\DEPT\PW\TRA\Concurrency\2016 CN Projects\16101238_Mod Pizza\Mod Pizza Concurrency LOS Summary 1/1 King County Department of Assessments: eReal Property Pagel of 3 1e:r Sa. rcb 1'roparr} i'a� t;ilE 1Snp ILis Paya•rtr laostar rp of €'er;^> Anm� RtpurE 3';•iirt V�oprrie Ueuri! �.� Reference Lin PARCEL DATA Parcel 92104-91..71 Jurisdiction ? V,rhY Name — -- CRATSENBERG LARRY Levy Code 1202 S+ANDRES•'.` Property Type C _ Site Address 2 iO4 S 32(7r; < S'r 9900' —� Plat Block i Building Number eo GArea `� '�% Plat Lot I Unit Number Spec Area _ _ Quarter -Section -Township - Property Name _TEAR DOWN 1 Range �SW-9 -21-4 Legal Description LOT 3-T MMAN UND V4 1N•r IN TR x ;LESS POI' FCR RC) AS PER „EC 41.006(i4t0: 2:364'} OF KCSP 1077139 REC g780' 301002 SD SP DAF- POR OF S 825 FT OF SE 1?4 OF SW 1r4 OF STR C'9-2'1-04 DAF- BA -AP ON S LN OF SO SUBD N Bg-34-08'W S1„25 FT FR SE COR THOF TH N 89-34.08 VV 486 FT 1•0111- TO SIN; COR OF SO SI SD TH N _01-0.`,-33 E ALG l?r LN OF SD SURD 825 01 FT TO N LN OF S 825 FT OF SO SURD TH S 39-24-08 E 488;80 FT TAP VNCH BRS N 00-1 "c-15 E FR POB TH S 00-18-15 VV 825 FT TO FOS LESS FOR. -2HOF FOR S 3201 H S r r: LESS POt2 1'('M RI) PE::R REC:# 20051-602011189,9 PLat Block: Plat Lot: Highest & Best Use As If ( COMMERCIAL ` Vacant SERVICE Highest & Best Use As PRE:SE NT US Improvod T Present Use - -- 8a.n. —-------1 Land Sgft Acres C 4+ Views I Rainier Territoriat �O[ympics -Cascades Seattle Skyline Puget Sound Lake Washington Lake Sarnmamish Lake/RiveriCreek Other View I Designations Historic Site i Current Use (inor:ei tdhr RIH,r Sites i Adjacent to Golf Fairway i+t0 Ailj_ROrtlit to Greenbelt NO Other Designation NO ' Deed Restrictions NU Development Rights NO Purchased __iNO Easements Native Growth Protection ,N0 Easement DNR Lease ]NO Percentage Unusable 0 Unbuildable NO Restrictive Size Shape NO Zoning CC-C Water SeweriSeptic Road Access Parking Street Surface King County Ta Links Property Tax Advisor WashiPgtpn Ste Dguartmentot Revenue (Exten link) Washington_SY Hoard of Tax Appeals (Extern link) Board of AgaeaME-99A Dist r C s ReQorl iMap Recorder's Offi, I S ann, rimed Imagee survey$ and Ott ma d� ocumentl �•Ja~ale I:)Isrrac r I PUBLIC PUeuc ADIEWATE PAVED' Waterfront L^•faterfrortt L—iion Waterfront Footage (i Lot Depth Factor Waterfront Bank TideiShore Waterfront Restricted Access Waterfront Access Rights NO r Poor Quality NO • Proximity Influence Topography ` — Traffc Noise_ Airport Noise Pry Nuisances — — Power Lines ' NO Other Nuisances NO Problems Water Problems 1NC -- Transportation Concurrency NO Other Problems NO Environmental y Environmental I NO BUILDING Building Number Click the camera to see more pictures. Building Description KEY BANK OiRIVE''T`HI:ZU Number Of Buildings Aggregated; I Predaminant Use kSAW (304) Shape iVer.Irreg Construction Class LIAJ OD F=RAME Building Quality GOAD V Stories Building Gross Sq Ft fiti5�8 — :13ull trg NetSq Ft — f Year Built 1989 http://info.kingcounty. gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/Detail.aspx?ParceINbr=0921049271 3/23 /2016 King County Department of Assessments: eReal Property Page 2 of 3 I Eff. Year I Percentage Complete 14CID heating System I F. 4 E CTF ? R-' VIJA' ' 2 Sprinklers Elevators ( Section(s) Of Building Number: 1 Section Number Section Use Description Stories Floor Number Gross Scl Ft Net Sr, Ft -- " -- `Heigh! , BAN K (204) 1 12 3 Accessory Accessory iption My Unit Of , She Grade Eff volue. Date Type Measure Yr Valued 10".�32C1,M :ILO/2000 AV E e S S.-I ja"e' eat TAX ROLL HISTORY F Appraised Appraised Appraised Now [Taxable Taxable Taxable Tax Omit Lovy I . -.- -1 — - Tax Account Land Imps Total 0*11mrs ""' �Mp. T,,5. a I Value Year Year Year Code Value(S) Value (S) Value - Value Value Value Reason (3) Dc C49 271 OS 2015 2016 '2012 r111.601i 5-3 6aj 'Z�.200 151: 1 GOO 153,6GO 16R�20,; ,.j-. j092j04WYJ0-"-: 2014 0 1 122 51 lW0 1,54-2.0;'. -'r"-'8na 1, �i2I0492710'1, 2013 2,} 14 121", DO 2 f) 0 0 511 ki""' i f17'5O(-' Q,', 2011 2 .013 12"2 51 1-FOD ;t- jo 5i 10-3210492'PIQ5 2011 2(i 12 -:202 ,11 r00 51.2,C.".0 io 0 512 5,00 :092164iQ j 106 r 2MG �-ovi z 111 202 36S.30-3 14 C �0'0 4, El 0 ) 16 .3t:3,3w 146 ajO 514800 0921MZ?j051,M. 2010 1202 368 -Snit,, 31 7000 0 .11. 0 0 C. -3 ,u 10. jr�� -0 1. 31,7C(. 5C, L) 0492710E 20103 '009 4v'19110 a Z 0 0 3132,303 :14C 900 518 109210492711164" 2008 20= 316s,3-30 i 4 .KO 48,400 516.700 IM-1049V11W,20015 2007 347.90D 1140,1100 70 00C I ji4 410 —10OT4818.'-�DU I 092104927105 2M5 2 C) n,5 1205 2M'sw 11 - V I W� 12--e-5.6,00 137,500 1424,'00 1 092104G27, V -; _77 MW 12POS i M.WO 1129.6w :Ac 20r, 0 2�,1,00 453.Z�'O 10S '0" .3 3236 M 10MIG4927105. 2MI ON 12853, 2-3, 6 cj 3 12 9. 7 00 3 C. 0 -.52. 323,OW ZS 7 '�aj M104VZ7105;2092 '2M 1205 3,23,r3Ou '47 3C.O 12'%700 z 17. 130-0 1W21CH921-1105 2MI 2CM 11205 323.600 2,33,84Z 7-400 :0 3 2 3 FC], 0 147,400 1 40 4DO 6121049272 6' 123.6.00 447.400 1IC5 2UW� 2.-Dai mm izaAw 80'; z0921104977TM 1ccj9 2000 [1205 323 FOO 23.6 447. :' Of) Q 23, 6'00 1 1205 M,600 23.;�-;" 44"; 200 Q -121-1600 123 600 44.7.200 i598 w1j .3 :. 60ius'dilm 151W I IM :1-7 TO 0 323i', 6100 447.2(j0 t) 0 0 323,M0 123,600 447 200 1092104027110Z 19N 1995 1 r-5 9 60 D 123 SOO 4472C 1 792104927105 1592 .1993 l20-5 i 8. 8G.O 3 0 0 2 -� GO, IC5 'OC] 14 5 1,900 1991 1 42. 9 0 () 1393, el j 91 211 0-4 U, 2 7'! 0921104927105 19819 1990% 3''3 0 140 C. 3 0 0, 5 00 �2 900 '393.400 U 9 -' 1, 0 4 9 2 7 - i rj 1983 1989 3,9u 0 0, ^ I if-jl 0 300.51,10 10 5-7 84, 2 00 0 092404%)21 - rl_ 1985 0 3 F 5 —,, 18.12 f;fj 0;9210'192710:- 1932 I SW 3490 10 0 10 ;00 2155.SM SALES HISTORY lExdse i Recording Documnt, Sale Sale Price Seller Name Buyer Name lNumber Number Bote. Reason one 2743854 71--:7/201 S 14-170 C-00,OC N http://info.kingcounty.gov/Assessor/eRealProperty/Detail.aspx?ParceINbr=0921049271 3/23/2016 King County Department of Assessments: eReal Property Page 3 of 3 CRATSENSERG NWCC CENTER I Bargain and I,AIRRY PLAZA LLC Sales Deed JR CRATSENBERG GRATSENGER431 Cl (RRRY pa.1d 3im 2743if49 201507170077348 Tll:!2045 :SO 00 PROPERTIES LLC i S+ANDREYVC i�h� JR CRATSENBERG Bargein arc 2465433 20iGf�C3407352 11l212010 $750,000.00 KEYBANK NA PROPPRTIES Safes Deed I None LCL 2190380 2(f050302001898 2.1151200E $O,G0 I KEYBANK NA FEDERAL YVAY CITY OF SLaWto v Warranty Othet I Geed 1 1792649 260197119900455 `C?12r2000 : $3,550.00 KEY BANK N A PUGETSOUND ENERGY INC Other -See Affidavit 'UnF,' F4JTOkANE PUGETSOUN❑ D€her - See 17;t2$95 2000092800t092 B?11•'2000 9;L,00G-00 SOUARE LLC. ENERGY INC Affidavit(Unkt IM41 IN" 1315 1r1311993 $:s,00 P.S..1 FUGE'r SOUND FINANCIAL. ;BANK mANAGEtAENT Oust Claim Deed 10thei REVIEW HISTORY �r Tax Review Review Appealed Hearing Settlement Decision Status Year Number Type Value pate Value 1997 880174E J Local Appeal $30� 500 711'1900 $300,SD0 SUSTAIN Complated 1985 8405535 Local App3a1 r $0 1!1l1900 , 30 REVISE Cornplelea PERMIT HISTORY HOME IMPROVEMENT EXEMPTION lieu 5enrcl� I`rolEer3}"('��F3iIE 11g1 Thl�l'mprz�r (:Ea..xrr a4 lcr;:;s ,t rea [2rgtttt PE i EttIll I, rlkO I http://info.kingcounty. gov/Assessor/eRealPropertyIDetail.aspx?ParceINbr=0921049271 3/23/2016 IN [7 w H ro m m E xd E E H :a po W z K b Z Z £ H H n u u 7•i n n L=i cn �a ow q C 0 in 0 *o n ro Ci X d O a X Ci (D M (D (D Fi M > rT (D I G v v r- IK Fi r a a > 0 0 ,A rt a M 'd O G rt G a 0 (D N F•- rt rt Co F'- rt F'- (n P- P. H- n N a a P- rt H N Cr P- P- Id 'd O rt rt N C (D G a rt .5 'd £ rt G a rt (D (D r a FS a a Fi (D (D F- rt (D a Ul rt (D (q C.' A (O 'O O v >i � r to •.] � •J P- (a (na a U) M a (D (D rt " rt ty (D Fi Ft H- P- rt 9 O P- FS r I H- >i ,r C .v .:v Ul 3 O ty rt P. N o (D (D C Ul n n a P- P- (D Fi (D (D F'- (D a d P- w � P. rt A 0 z K IO G (D 13 CO rt rr 3 m b7 C •J F( ti tr' tS rT r r p o O C r- t7 t7 FS m rt rt (q m ew t0 a tY ti z ul n (n C7 K K O O rt H- �:s Ci a a ul K m z £ H C K CJ •J ;n (D n a t7 m m m W rt rr ri m z Fi H a KD ul rt W Zl a m m n d -3 a s £ (D H r- Fi C b] Z1 H rT rt ow a ,A a rt rT K £ n 'd F•- (D A a H (D •J G rt a It rr H N- Ul Id Fi G rr O v z a m 0 0 m a w I'i H ro m a Pi (D 'Z' N a r* ro G G r- FS ro (q rt C P. O w ,d W W m o (D (D p m '~d ((DD o Far (p •J •J rt a (D rt .J H- 0 •J Fib co x oo o l" 1j 1-• W I-+ w ty F'- a r io w w P7 [�A [�A o r o d o w e~ w cn o �• o W N O O J I m I'3 N UI �7 ^h H �P LGn H Ln O N O ',d O U7 W Cn �D O O O 0) O a C b rn h < h Wcl O� '� 'b O O O P7 O O O O O H O O O d O co F+. F+- O O O ^M O O O O O 'f/ O O N R I Vl Cn O rt $ tJ O y b y 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O O N N In � � a cl ozb ,zb y 0 0 0 It 0 0 o d o 0 0 0 o z o 0 m m CJ Lei C J m w w m m [J m m w m w m m w m p C5 G d G Ci p 0 z 0 G 0 G 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 rt rt rt rT rt rt rt rT rt rt rt rT rt rT rt rt cT rt rt rt m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Fi FS Fi Fi Fi N Fi Fi " Fi Fi Fi Fi Fi ri Fi i i Fj rt rt rr t1 rt rt rt rT rr z Z 10 H H H C n a m m x a �y o�3G' ]r �3G' G G G G H F•- a 0 (D m m m m m p m m m m m�� Z m m a a O O n n 0 FS cn xl ro x C m m rt 'd C m o F; FS 0 0 0 F- rt a m P- 0 Fi Fi H- m a ro C�J FS m d m rt a rt Fi (q £ rt �:j m Ul rt 0oMI�am Nmm°MK (D a�-m Ul N IT 3 0 ,4 F✓- a r- r- a d m rt O d C 0 G o p n n Fi rt rT O rn Fh rt m a rat (D rt(D W t7 w cGT G H C m r- �$ 0�:j r t m w rt r a�l a n O rr r„ rt W m rt a K r- a Fi O p < O a P. m m N- a °, x° w w M 'oo w m (moo � m m i rt H O . (D .' < rt FS 0 F•- d w (D m .�1Y nH, r Q m H 0 m rt rT rt a rt 0 rt V Iai Fmi FT o w •_ a w m m w p V. 0' - m n- rt a v► r F'm d " F o 0 n w m n I1 m rt rt H m m w° (n P, F- 1 m ri rt q r- m ra 3 rt 0 n o Fi Vi 4 0 m m p rt w r �y V' 0 Vn J' of Nw/ Lo zt 7 1, I ! , 17 col I Z z a cr, CD 11 th Av, SW S VY vt t 25th c� 7 lD _ Q A � � I LOZT 1 J FL fB f 2i I En rD (D HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2549: 14 Av S & S 312 St 5/512o1s Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +I +T-1 +T+ fi r Traffic Volume (vph) 73 590 34 26 808 45 52 15 16 58 9 64 Future Volume (vph) 73 590 34 26 808 45 52 15 16 58 9 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fr{ 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3408 1770 3376 1764 1761 1536 Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 432 3408 713 3376 1764 1761 1536 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 75 608 35 30 929 52 83 24 25 69 11 76 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 70 Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 641 0 30 979 0 0 126 0 0 80 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 20 20 27 39 8 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (Who 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Split NA Split NA Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 6 6 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 97.2 93.9 97.2 83.2 14.2 10.6 10.6 Effective Green, g (s) 97.2 93.9 97.2 83.2 14.2 10.6 10.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.67 0.69 0.59 0.10 0.08 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 435 2285 519 2006 178 133 116 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.19 0.00 co.29 c0.07 c0.05 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.28 0.06 0.49 0.71 0.60 0.05 Uniform Delay, d1 15.2 9.3 6.8 16.2 60.9 62.7 60.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.7 9.9 5.2 0.1 Delay (s) 15.3 9.7 3.7 11.2 70.8 67.8 60.1 Level of Service B A A B E E E Approach Delay (s) 10.2 11.0 70.8 64.1 Approach LOS B B E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service $ HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 14 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EwBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations tl_�- I TT, A) ttll� Zi Traffic Volume (vph) 201 345 120 143 481 117 30 202 883 80 79 134 Future Volume (vph) 201 345 120 143 481 117 30 202 883 80 79 134 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1733 3250 1754 3267 3439 4982 1773 Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm)_ 353 3250 617 3267 3439 4982 1773 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 218 375 130 157 529 129 31 208 910 82 86 146 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 26 0 0 15 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 479 0 157 643 0 0 239 985 0 0 232 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 33 18 64 15 52 34 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 6 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 50.6 41.0 51.1 36.5 13.2 42.4 27.0 Effective Green, g (s) 48.6 40.0 49.1 35.5 13.2 42.4 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.29 0.35 0.25 0.09 0.30 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 928 290 828 324 1508 341 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.15 0.04 0.20 0.07 c0.20 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.52 0.54 0.78 0.74 0.65 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 52.3 41.9 33.0 48.6 61.7 42.4 52.5 Progression Factor 0.85 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.72 0.60 Incremental Delay, d2 24.4 0.2 1.1 4.2 6.5 2.0 3.8 Delay (s) 69.0 37.3 34.1 52.8 60.3 32.6 35.0 Level of Service E D C D E C D Approach Delay (s) 46.9 49.2 38.0 Approach LOS D D D Intersection Summary E HCM 2000 Control Delay 12-n HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 14 0. 0 ✓ Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 i 4/ Movement SBT SBR LandMonfigurations ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 1195 220 Future Volume (vph) 1195 220 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5108 1460 At Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5108 1460 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1299 239 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 48 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1299 191 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 45 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 56.2 70.3 Effective Green, g (s) 56.2 68.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.49 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2050 712 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.27 Uniform Delay, dl 33.6 21.1 Progression Factor 0.40 0.31 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.1 Delay (s) 14.8 6.7 Level of Service B A Approach Delay (s) 16.4 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2552: 20 Av S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 4\ fi Movement EBL EBT EBR W6L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBI. SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT. tT 4 r +T# Traffic Volume (vph) 4 361 129 109 489 23 177 37 125 21 24 4 Future Volume (vph) 4 361 129 109 489 23 177 37 125 21 24 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% 4% -1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 3183 1816 3478 1831 1517 1774 At Permitted 0.42 1.00 0.42 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.69 Satd. Flow (perm) 759 3183 812 3478 1386 1517 1257 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.76 0.76 0.76 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 397 142 124 556 26 188 39 133 28 32 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 107 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 524 0 124 581 0 0 227 26 0 62 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 7 6 7 1 9 3 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 97.6 88.3 98.1 96.6 27.9 27.9 28.4 Effective Green, g (s) 97.6 88.3 98.1 96.6 26.9 26.9 27.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.63 0.70 0.69 0.19 0.19 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 536 2007 639 2399 266 291 246 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.16 c0.01 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.12 c0.16 0.02 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.26 0.19 0.24 0.85 0.09 0.25 Uniform Delay, dl 7.7 11.4 9.2 8.1 54.6 46.5 47.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.30 3.57 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.2 21.2 0.0 0.2 Delay (s) 7.7 11.7 9.3 8.3 92.0 165.9 47.8 Level of Service A B A A F F D Approach Delay (s) 11.7 8.5 119.3 47.8 Approach LOS B A F D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 15.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2554: 23 AV S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 Movement BBT EBR WBL WBT NBI_ Lane Configurations f I + V Traffic Volume (vph) 329 143 49 399 210 65 Future Volume (vph) 329 143 49 399 210 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) -8% 8% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1891 1552 1702 1791 1755 1464 At Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow erm 1891 1552 1702 1791 1755 1464 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 366 159 54 443 226 70 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 57 0 0 0 59 Lane Group Flow (vph) 366 102 54 443 226 11 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 6 9 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#!hr) 0 2 2 2 2 0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 89.7 89.7 13.2 108.4 22.6 22.6 Effective Green, g (s) 89.7 89.7 12.2 108.4 21.6 22.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.09 0.77 0.15 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1211 994 148 1386 270 236 v/s Ratio Prot 0.19 0.03 c0.25 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.10 0.36 0.32 0.84 0.05 Uniform Delay, dl 11.2 9.7 60.2 4.7 57.5 49.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.80 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.6 18.7 0.0 Delay (s) 11.8 9.9 60.8 5.3 68.6 89.2 Level of Service B A E A E F Approach Delay (s) 11.3 11.4 73.5 Approach LOS B B E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.4 �'/ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2652: 20 AV S & S 314 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL E3T EBR WBL WET WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T�- Tj T� Traffic Volume (vph) 22 9 73 110 16 33 56 273 45 27 204 11 Future Volume (vph) 22 9 73 110 16 33 56 273 45 27 204 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 3% 1 % 4% -5% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1743 1485 1767 1624 1759 1747 1822 1845 Fit Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.50 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1320 1485 1027 1624 1072 1747 964 1845 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.82 0.82 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 26 11 87 131 19 39 64 310 51 33 249 13 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 80 0 0 33 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 18 0 131 25 0 64 358 0 33 261 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 4 9 4 9 5 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 1 % 1 % 1 % Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.3 12.7 26.3 22.0 94.7 92.3 95.7 89.6 Effective Green, g (s) 24.3 11.7 24.3 21.0 92.7 91.3 93.7 88.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.08 0.17 0.15 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.63 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) _ _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 239 124 244 243 729 _ 1139 659 1167 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.01 c0.05 0.02 c0.00 c0.21 0.00 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.04 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.15 0.54 0.10 0.09 0.31 0.05 . 0.22 Uniform Delay, d1 48.5 59.5 51.7 51.4 8.3 10.7 8.0 11.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.68 0.73 • 0.80 0.73 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.4 Delay (s) 48.6 59.7 48.7 42.8 5.7 8.5 6.4 8.5 Level of Service D E D D A A A A Approach Delay (s) 57.4 46.9 8.1 8.2 Approach LOS E D A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.36 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0.0 / Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2654: 23 Av S & S 314 St 5/5/2016 � � �' f- � � -� Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NIBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4,, * I 1, Traffic Volume (vph) 7 0 160 2 2 4 71 271 7 3 194 15 Future Volume (vph) 7 0 160 2 2 4 71 271 7 3 194 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -6% 6% 7% -7% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.90 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frt 0.87 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1520 1623 1653 1713 1785 1832 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.80 0.61 1.00 0.57 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1499 1321 1067 1713 1072 1832 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 10 0 239 3 3 6 80 304 8 3 216 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 226 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 23 0 0 6 0 80 312 0 3 232 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 20 4 13 16 14 10 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.5 9.0 117.0 117.0 118.0 111.5 Effective Green, g (s) 7.5 8.0 115.0 116.0 116.0 110.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.06 0.82 0.83 0.83 0.79 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 80 75 895 1419 888 1445 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.18 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm c0.02 0.00 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.08 0.09 0.22 0.00 0.16 Uniform Delay, d1 63.7 62.5 2.3 2.5 2.1 3.6 Progression Factor 1.27 1.00 1.03 1.02 1.12 1.52 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 Delay (s) 81.7 62.7 2.4 2.9 2.3 5.7 Level of Service F E A A A A Approach Delay (s) 81.7 62.7 2.8 5.6 Approach LOS F E A A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.23 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario - Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 5/5/2016 --* _0� 'r -+-- 'I- fl 4\ L Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations T+ T A ttT Traffic Volume (vph) 73 60 104 126 80 107 76 208 1112 91 42 77 Future Volume (vph) 73 60 104 126 80 107 76 208 1112 91 42 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1759 1560 1698 1584 1769 4941 1737 Flt Permitted 0.37 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 682 1560 737 1584 1769 4941 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 71 124 140 89 119 86 236 1264 103 45 82 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 48 0 0 38 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 147 0 140 170 0 0 322 1362 0 0 127 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 33 18 16 15 28 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/'hr) _ 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 29.5 24.3 29.5 22.7 32.5 77.5 14.0 Effective Green, g (s) 27.5 23.3 27.5 21.7 32.5 77.5 14.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.17 0.20 0.15 0.23 0.55 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 178 259 173 245 410 2735 173 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.11 c0.18 0.28 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.13 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.57 0.81 0.69 0.79 0.50 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 47.9 53.7 58.6 56.0 50.5 19.3 61.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.53 1.60 0.81 0.81 0.68 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.7 21.4 6.3 7.4 0.5 10.7 Delay (s) 48.7 55.4 111.0 96.0 48.2 16.1 52.1 Level of Service D E F F D B D Approach Delay (s) 53.3 102.0 22.2 Approach LOS D F C Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.7 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 40.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 5/5/2016 Movement 5BT SBR LaneMonfigurations +0 Traffic Volume (vph) 1397 56 Future Volume (vph) 1397 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 At Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5061 At Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 5061 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 1486 60 RTOR Reduction (vph) 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1543 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 21 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages #mr 4 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2132 v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.72 Uniform Delay, d1 33.7 Progression Factor 0.64 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 Delay (s) 23.3 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 25.5 Approach LOS C Irttsrsestlon. Summ _ Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2752: 20 Av S & S 316 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL .,NB.T NOR SBL SBT SB,R Lane Configurations °i T I 1� T, T Traffic Volume (vph) 46 113 65 39 165 100 40 202 45 67 260 33 Future Volume (vph) 46 113 65 39 165 100 40 202 45 67 260 33 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1% 1% 4% -6% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1708 1539 1712 1545 1668 1706 1772 1825 Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.54 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 419 1539 796 1545 829 1706 1007 1825 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 Adj. Flow (vph) 53 131 76 46 194 118 44 224 50 84 325 41 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 19 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 189 0 46 293 0 44 270 0 84 364 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 6 20 9 15 11 18 9 17 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockaqes (#/hr) 0 7 0 0 i0 0 10 0 7 7 0 10 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 38.0 31.9 38.0 31.4 83.0 76.7 84.0 77.9 Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 30.9 36.0 30.4 81.0 75.7 82.0 76.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.22 0.26 0.22 0.58 0.54 0.59 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 159 339 238 335 504 922 624 _ 1002 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.12 0.01 c0.19 0.00 0.16 c0.01 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.56 0.19 0.88 0.09 0.29 0.13 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 41.1 48.5 40.0 53.0 13.2 17.5 12.8 17.8 Progression Factor 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.23 1.23 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.0 0.1 21.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.0 Delay (s) 42.2 50.4 40.2 74.0 13.2 18.3 15.8 22.9 Level of Service D D D E B B B C Approach Delay (s) 48.7 69.6 17.6 21.6 Approach LOS D E B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49 / Actuated Cycle Length (s) V Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2754: 23 AV S & S 316 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBR SBL SBR NWL NWR Lane Configurations Y r Traffic Volume (vph) 52 135 353 18 182 330 Future Volume (vph) 52 135 353 18 182 330 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 11 Grade (%) 0% -7% 4% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1722 1382 1744 1520 1473 At Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1812 1382 1744 1600 1473 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 55 142 388 20 190 344 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 121 1 0 0 61 Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 21 407 0 190 283 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 22 22 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% Bus Blockages #!hr 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type custom pm+ov Prot D.P+P Prot Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.8 22.3 102.7 110.2 116.2 Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 20.3 101.7 108.2 115.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.15 0.73 0.77 0.82 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 96 259 1266 1232 1212 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.00 c0.23 0.01 c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm c0.00 0.01 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.08 0.32 0.15 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 64.5 51.8 6.8 4.1 2.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.61 0.44 Incremental Delay, d2 5.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.4 Delay (s) 69.6 51.8 7.5 2.5 1.6 Level of Service E D A A A Approach Delay (s) 56.8 7.5 1.9 Approach LOS E A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2855: 23 AV S & S 317 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EST ESR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations 4+ 1 ll� I ti + if Traffic Volume (vph) 10 12 11 311 25 145 120 626 11 16 368 161 Future Volume (vph) 10 12 11 311 25 145 120 626 11 16 368 161 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 11 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 0% -3% 0% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.95 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 932 1509 1140 1597 3252 1491 1761 1403 At Permitted 0.91 0.73 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (per2) _ 865 1162 1140 669 3252 527 1761 1403 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 12 14 13 327 26 153 130 680 12 18 418 183 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 30 0 327 76 0 130 692 0 18 418 92 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 49 20 76 47 20 Heavy Vehicles (%) 92% 92% 92% 8% 8% 8% 9% 2% 25% 4% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 7 20 20 34 2 7 20 34 34 2 7 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 8 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.4 45.9 45.9 80.1 77.7 80.1 70.7 70.7 Effective Green, g (s) 45.4 45.9 45.9 78.1 76.7 79.1 70.2 70.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.56 0.55 0.56 0.50 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 280 380 373 428 1781 310 883 703 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.02 c0.21 0.00 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.28 0.15 0.03 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.86 0.20 0.30 0.39 0.06 0.47 0.13 Uniform Delay, d1 33.1 44.1 33.9 16.0 18.2 13.8 22.8 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.83 0.71 0.68 0.60 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 17.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 1.7 0.4 Delay (s) 33.2 61.2 34.0 12.6 15.8 9.8 17.3 11.5 Level of Service C E C B B A B B Approach Delay (s) 33.2 51.6 15.3 15.3 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio CMV, Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3048: 11 PI S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 � � f- 'I- 4\ MoWthent EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT 1NBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t' ' to I T Traffic Volume (vph) 32 1101 210 66 1613 6 410 3 105 39 1 5 Future Volume (vph) . 32 1101 210 66 1613 6 410 3 105 39 1 5 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 2% -1 % 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.73 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.88 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3251 1778 3381 1696 1528 1767 1200 At Permitted 0.06 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 118 3251 229 3381 0 1528 0 1200 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 32 1101 210 66 1613 6 410 3 105 39 1 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 0 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 1302 0 66 1619 0 410 25 0 39 1 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 84.7 79.4 84.7 81.5 35.1 29.8 6.5 1.2 Effective Green, g (s) 84.7 79.4 84.7 81.5 34.6 29.3 5.5 0.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.57 0.61 0.58 0.25 0.21 0.04 0.00 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 108 1843 197 1968 419 319 69 1 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.40 c0.01 c0.48 c0.24 0.02 c0.02 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.71 0.34 0.82 0.98 0.08 0.57 1.01 Uniform Delay, dl 20.2 21.9 16.1 23.5 52.3 44.5 66.1 69.9 Progression Factor 0.95 0.68 0.75 1.12 0.98 1.19 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 2.1 0.2 2.2 37.6 0.0 6.2 904.8 Delay (s) 19.7 16.9 12.2 28.5 88.8 53.1 72.3 974.7 Level of Service B B B C F D E F Approach Delay (s) 17.0 27.8 81.3 192.6 Approach LOS B C F F Intersection Summ HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.8 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 t 'A --j. -.,* (W f- -- - fl T /P. Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WEIR NEU NBL NET NBR Lane Configurations M +0 �i) ttf r �) W, Traffic Volume (vph) 49 356 837 71 39 445 1417 220 60 227 792 226 Future Volume (vph) 49 356 837 71 39 445 1417 220 60 227 792 226 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3536 5140 3433 5031 1548 3344 4842 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3536 5140 3433 5031 1548 3344 4842 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 49 356 837 71 39 445 1417 220 60 227 792 226 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 36 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 405 901 0 0 484 1417 140 0 287 982 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot . NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 40.6 22.0 43.6 43.6 17.5 42.4 Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 40.6 22.0 43.6 43.6 17.5 42.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.29 0.16 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 467 1490 539� 1566 482 418 1466 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.18 0.14 c0.28 c0.09 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.60 0.90 0.90 0.29 0.69 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 59.5 42.8 57.9 46.2 36.5 58.6 42.7 Progression Factor 0.74 0.74 1.11 1.14 1.52 0.64 0.85 Incremental Delay, d2 12.6 1.5 13.7 7.1 1.2 2.9 1.9 Delay (s) 57.0 33.4 78.2 59.7 56.8 40.4 38.3 Level of Service E C E E E D D Approach Delay (s) 40.6 63.6 38.8 Approach LOS D E D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio (:�0.81JActuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 L# \,.� j 4/ MoVernent SBU SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 52 252 1008 315 Future Volume (vph) 52 252 1008 315 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1510 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3440 5136 1510 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 52 252 1008 315 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 125 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 304 1008 190 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #mr 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 39.4 39.4 Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 39.4 39.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 1445 424 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.70 0.45 Uniform Delay, dl 61.7 45.0 41.4 Progression Factor 0.89 0.48 0.30 Incremental Delay, d2 12.5 2.0 2.4 Delay (s) 67.5 23.4 14.7 Level of Service E C B Approach Delay (s) 30.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 3 ' -'t (W f- .4--- '1- f Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WK WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations M +0 All ?+t 3 T Traffic Volume (vph) 9 213 970 73 10 57 1696 102 134 83 64 160 Future Volume (vph) 9 213 970 73 10 57 1696 102 134 83 64 160 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3368 4901 3285 4791 1690 1673 1701 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.45 Satd. Flow (perm) 3368 4901 3285 4791 319 1673 813 Peak -hour factor, PHF 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 9 213 970 73 10 57 1696 102 134 83 64 160 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 23 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 222 1038 0 0 67 1794 0 134 124 0 160 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #/hr) _ 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.6 82.3 8.4 78.1 30.8 18.9 30.8 Effective Green, g (s) 12.6 82.3 8.4 78.1 29.8 18.4 29.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.59 0.06 0.56 0.21 0.13 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 303 2881 197 2672 141 219 245 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.21 0.02 c0.37 c0.05 0.07 c0.05 v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.36 0.34 0.67 0.95 0.57 0.65 Uniform Delay, d1 62.1 15.1 63.1 21.9 62.1 57.1 53.8 Progression Factor 0.65 1.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 0.3 0.4 1.4 60.2 2.0 4.7 Delay (s) 46.0 25.3 63.5 23.2 122.3 59.1 58.5 Level of Service D C E C F E E Approach Delay (s) 28.9 24.7 89.2 Approach LOS C C F Intersection_Summaa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 *I Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 i 4/ hoo"ht SBT SSR LaneVonfigu rations '+ Traffic Volume (vph) 81 206 Future Volume (vph) 81 206 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.89 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1601 At Permitted 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 1601 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 206 RTOR Reduction (vph) 71 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 216 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 0 4 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 22.8 Effective Green, g (s) 22.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.85 Uniform Delay, d1 57.2 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.4 Delay (s) 78.6 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) 71.4 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 2 # --* '+-- AL, 4� fi 1 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR VVBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M +tT )) ttl' I t ?F Vii) T Traffic Volume (vph) 7 137 1037 21 353 1527 166 71 165 284 476 270 Future Volume (vph) 7 137 1037 21 353 1527 166 71 165 284 476 270 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4901 3448 5094 1733 1735 1516 3392 1686 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3240 4901 3448 5094 1733 1735 1516 3392 1686 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 137 1037 21 353 1527 166 71 165 284 476 270 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 63 0 14 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 144 1057 0 353 1685 0 71 165 221 476 391 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 16 6 10 _ 10 4 16 16 6 6 10 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA _4 Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 55.7 17.5 63.6 7.9 25.0 42.5 21.8 38.9 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 55.7 17.5 63.6 7.4 24.5 42.5 21.3 38.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.40 0.12 0.45 0.05 0.18 0.30 0.15 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 222 1949 431 2314 91 303 519 516 462 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.22 c0.10 c0.33 0.04 0.10 0.05 c0.14 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.54 0.82 0.73 0.78 0.54 0.43 0.92 0.85 Uniform Delay, d1 63.6 32.4 59.7 31.1 65.5 52.7 39.0 58.5 48.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.23 0.99 1.22 0.76 1.11 1.08 Incremental Delay, d2 4.8 1.1 8.3 1.5 31.7 1.1 0.2 20.3 11.8 Delay (s) 68.4 33.4 75.3 39.9 96.8 65.4 29.7 85.3 63.6 Level of Service E C E D F E C F E Approach Delay (s) 37.6 46.0 50.2 75.3 Approach LOS D D D E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0.0 to""' Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 4/ Movement 5BR Lan4iConfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) 135 Future Volume (vph) 135 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor FMb, pedlbikes Flpb, pedlbikes Frt Fit Protected Said. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Saul. Flow(perm) Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 135 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 10 Bus Blockages (Who 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot vls Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 19 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3056: 25 Av S/Gateway Center Blvd S & S 320 St/ S 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SOL Lane Configurations 9 T?T+ ' ttla Vi T Traffic Volume (vph) 9 79 1622 10 3 28 1940 192 25 9 88 133 Future Volume (vph) 9 79 1622 10 3 28 1940 192 25 9 88 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -1% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Fri: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.86 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 4988 1778 5007 1724 1558 1724 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.65 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 4988 1778 5007 1279 1558 1172 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 ` 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 9 79 1622 10 3 28 1940 192 25 9 88 133 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 78 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 88 1632 0 0 31 2125 0 25 19 0 133 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 6 0 6 0 2 0 2 0 6 6 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.6 89.2 4.9 81.5 26.4 16.6 26.4 Effective Green, g (s) 12.6 89.2 4.9 81.5 24.4 15.6 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.64 0.04 0.58 0.17 0.11 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 157 3178 62 2914 236 173 238 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.33 0.02 c0.42 0.00 0.01 c0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.06 v/c Ratio 0.56 .0.51 0.50 0.73 0.11 0.11 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 61.0 13.7 66.3 21.2 48.7 55.9 54.4 Progression Factor 0.87 0.47 1.08 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.5 2.0 1.4 0.1 0.1 1.6 Delay (s) 55.1 6.9 73.4 14.4 48.7 56.0 56.0 Level of Service E A E B D E E Approach Delay (s) 9.4 15.2 54.6 Approach LOS A B D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio D.6$ Actuated Cycle Length (s) ✓ Sum of lost time (s) 21.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service ❑ Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 20 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3056: 25 AV S/Gateway Center Blvd S & S 320 St/ S 320 St 5/5/2016 i 4/ Movement SBT SBR LaOU onfig u rations '* Traffic Volume (vph) 3 77 Future Volume (vph) 3 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.86 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1563 At Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1563 Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Bus Blockages #/hr 1.00 3 66 14 0 1.00 77 0 0 10 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 223 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.06 Uniform Delay, dl 51.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 Delay (s) 51.9 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 54.5 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SB Ramp & S 320 St/S 320 St& 1-5 SB Ramp 5/5/2016 ._0 1 ---* f- 4---t 4\ I �I � ♦ f r Movement EBL EBT EBR WSL WBT WBR NBL NBR SWL2 SYUL SWR Lane Conflgurabons Ttt r ttt b W Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1491 347 100 1315 0 0 0 522 3 943 Future Volume (vph) 0 1491 347 100 1315 0 0 0 522 3 943 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1460 1741 5072 1651 1664 3564 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1460 1741 5072 1651 1664 3564 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1491 347 100 1315 0 0 0 522 3 943 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1491 193 100 1315 0 0 0 261 264 891 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 0 2 4 4 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 74.8 74.8 19.0 83.8 31.2 31.2 46.2 Effective Green, g (s) 74.8 74.8 19.0 83.8 31.2 31.2 46.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.14 0.60 0.22 0.22 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2696 780 236 3035 _ 367 370 1176 v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 0.06 c0.26 0.16 0.16 c0.25 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.25 0.42 0.43 0.71 0.71 0.76 Uniform Delay, dl 21.5 17.5 55.5 15.2 50.2 50.3 41.9 Progression Factor 0.62 0.94 1.09 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 5.3 5.4 2.5 Delay (s) 14.1 17.1 60.8 13.3 55.6 55.6 44.4 Level of Service B B E B E E D Approach Delay (s) 14.7 16.6 0.0 48.4 Approach LOS B B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio CPO 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: All Traffic Data Services - 11/4/04 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3255: 23 AV S & S 322 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 'i T +T 7'll� Traffic Volume (vph) 41 1 39 43 12 85 25 388 10 42 463 23 Future Volume (vph) 41 1 39 43 12 85 25 388 10 42 463 23 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -3% 0% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1720 1577 1705 1601 1772 3485 1788 3513 Flt Permitted 0.56 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.51 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1022 1577 1312 1601 869 3485 967 3513 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 1 39 43 12 85 25 388 10 42 463 23 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 36 0 0 78 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 4 0 43 19 0 25 397 0 42 485 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 10 0 10 10 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 13.0 19.5 13.2 102.0 97.4 102.0 98.7 Effective Green, g (s) 17.5 12.0 17.5 12.2 101.0 96.9 101.0 98.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.72 0.69 0.72 0.70 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 154 135 179 139 644 2412 721 2464 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.11 c0.00 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm c0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.03 0.24 0.14 0.04 0.16 0.06 0.20 Uniform Delay, d1 54.9 58.7 55.0 59.1 5.5 7.5 5.6 7.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.07 0.10 0.15 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 55.3 58.7 55.2 59.2 6.2 8.1 0.6 1.2 Level of Service E E E E A A A A Approach Delay (s) 57.0 58.0 8.0 1.1 Approach LOS E E A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio C�v Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 21.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 23 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3348: 13 PI S/11 PI S & S 324 St 5/5/2016 'r t ti Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR S8L SBT Lane Configurations r + r + Traffic Volume (vph) 179 200 209 186 142 167 Future Volume (vph) 179 200 209 186 142 167 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 0% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1567 1863 1583 1787 1881 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1567 1863 1583 1119 1881 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 179 200 209 186 142 167 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 156 0 54 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 179 44 209 132 142 167 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 81 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.9 30.9 99.1 99.1 111.1 111.1 Effective Green, g (s) 18.9 30.9 99.1 99.1 111.1 111.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.22 0.71 0.71 0.79 0.79 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 236 345 1318 1120 921 1492 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.03 c0.11 c0.01 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.13 0.16 0.12 0.15 0.11 Uniform Delay, d1 58.4 43.7 6.7 6.5 3.4 3.3 Progression Factor 0.92 2.36 1.00 1.00 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 8.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 61.6 103.2 7.0 6.7 0.4 0.5 Level of Service E F A A A A Approach Delay (s) 83.5 6.9 0.4 Approach LOS F A A Intersection Summ HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.25 Actuated Cycle Length (s) . , Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 24 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 5/5/2016 � � � ' fl -*�' L* \0- N1ii fffeM EBL EBT EBR WSL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t r T. +0 Zi Traffic Volume (vph) 85 179 130 431 167 54 167 156 1195 228 50 100 Future Volume (vph) 85 179 130 431 167 54 167 156 1195 228 50 100 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1 % 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1516 3375 1761 1755 4924 1713 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1778 1812 1516 3375 1761 1755 4924 1713 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 85 179 130 431 167 54 167 156 1195 228 50 100 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 109 0 9 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 85 179 21 431 212 0 0 323 1406 0 0 150 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 6 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 22.6 22.6 19.0 31.1 26.0 62.4 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 22.1 22.1 18.5 30.6 26.0 62.4 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.22 0.19 0.45 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 127 286 239 445 384 325 2194 195 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.10 c0.13 0.12 c0.18 0.29 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.63 0.09 0.97 0.55 0.99 0.64 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 63.4 55.1 50.3 60.5 48.6 56.9 30.1 60.2 Progression Factor 0.96 0.87 1.26 0.74 0.89 1.25 0.85 0.60 Incremental Delay, d2 9.9 3.1 0.1 33.9 1.0 44.8 1.3 10.5 Delay (s) 71.0 51.0 63.6 78.6 44.1 116.1 26.9 46.9 Level of Service E D E E D F C D Approach Delay (s) 59.5 66.9 43.4 Approach LOS E E D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) D ,� Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 25 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 5/5/2016 i 4/ Movement tBt tt LanEMonfigurations +tT# Traffic Volume (vph) 1368 93 Future Volume (vph) 1368 93 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4981 At Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 4981 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1368 93 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1456 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 52.4 Effective Green, g (s) 52.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1864 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 Uniform Delay, d1 38.7 Progression Factor 0.38 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 Delay (s) 17.1 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 19.9 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 26 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 41. +T ?F 1) ++Tl M Traffic Volume (vph) 30 30 21 431 24 206 35 16 972 344 6 326 Future Volume (vph) 30 30 21 431 24 206 35 16 972 344 6 326 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1768 1711 1729 1585 1787 4832 3318 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Flow (perm) 1768 1711 1729 1585 1787 4832 3318 _Satd. Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 34 34 24 468 26 224 39 18 1080 382 6 343 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 0 34 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 0 248 246 42 0 57 1428 0 0 349 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 27 14 22 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 _Bus Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.4 26.0 26.0 26.0 7.2 58.9 10.7 Effective Green, g (s) 21.4 26.0 26.0 26.0 7.7 59.4 11.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.42 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 270 317 321 294 98 2050 265 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 c0.14 0.14 0.03 0.30 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.78 0.77 0.14 0.58 0.70 1.32 Uniform Delay, d1 53.0 54.3 54.1 47.7 64.6 32.9 64.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.88 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 11.0 9.5 0.1 5.3 1.9 166.8 Delay (s) 53.3 65.3 63.6 47.7 61.2 31.0 231.8 Level of Service D E E D E C F Approach Delay (s) 53.3 59.2 32.2 Approach LOS D E C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.851f Actuated Cycle Length (s) ✓ Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwy S & S 288 St 5/5/2016 i 4/ Miavernent SBT SBR Laronfigurations +T'+ Traffic Volume (vph) 1896 66 Future Volume (vph) 1896 66 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4984 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow erm 4984 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 1996 69 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 2063 0 Confl. Peds. (#mr) 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr) 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 62.4 Effective Green, g (s) 62.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2239 v/s Ratio Prot c0.41 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 36.2 Progression Factor 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 7.7 Delay (s) 44.4 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 71.5 Approach LOS E intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1651: Pacific Hwy S & S Dash Point Rd 5/5/2016 -A � +, 4\ T L �4/ Movement EBL EBR NBU N$L NBT 5BU WT SOR.. Lane Configurations VIVI r �i ttt a r Traffic Volume (vph) 369 124 53 184 1002 43 1519 872 Future Volume (vph) 369 124 53 184 1002 43 1519 872 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3311 1482 1787 5095 1753 5099 1581 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3311 1482 1787 5095 416 5099 1581 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 410 138 56 196 1066 46 1616 928 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 65 Lane Group Flow (vph) 410 30 0 252 1066 46 1616 863 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr 6 9 9 0 6 6 9 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 30.8 30.8 22.8 86.1 93.7 70.9 101.7 Effective Green, g (s) 30.8 30.8 22.8 86.6 93.7 71.4 101.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.16 0.62 0.67 0.51 0.73 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 728 326 291 3151 351 2600 1148 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.14 0.21 0.01 0.32 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.08 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.09 0.87 0.34 0.13 0.62 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 48.6 43.5 57.1 12.9 12.7 24.6 11.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.56 2.02 1.49 2.63 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 20.9 0.3 0.0 0.6 1.4 Delay (s) 49.2 43.5 74.6 7.5 25.7 37.4 31.7 Level of Service D D E A C D C Approach Delay (s) 47.8 20.3 35.2 Approach LOS D C D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Q.17 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2051: Pacific Hwy S & S 304 St 5/512016 Movement EBL EBT EBR INBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations *' r 4� A TTl Traffic Volume (vph) 35 43 54 124 53 70 84 55 1094 123 5 69 Future Volume (vph) 35 43 54 124 53 70 84 55 1094 123 5 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 5% -1% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1795 1471 1654 1778 4976 1752 At Permitted 0.74 1.00 0.75 0.95 1.00 0.18 Satd. Flow (perm) 1352 1471 1269 1778 4976 333 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 51 63 79 135 58 76 86 56 1116 126 5 75 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 62 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 114 17 0 257 0 0 142 1234 0 0 80 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 6 8 3 3 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P D.P+P Protected Phases 4 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 19.5 85.4 92.0 Effective Green, g (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 19.5 85.4 92.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.61 0.66 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 299 325 280 247 3035 285 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.25 0.01 vls Ratio Perm 0.08 0.01 c0.20 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.05 0.92 0.57 0.41 0.28 Uniform Delay, dl 46.3 42.9 53.3 56.4 14.2 9.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.86 0.71 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 32.4 1.9 0.4 0.2 Delay (s) 46.6 43.0 85.6 47.9 12.5 6.8 Level of Service D D F D B A Approach Delay (s) 45.1 85.6 16.1 Approach LOS D F B Intersection summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 17.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2051: Pacific Hwy S & S 304 St 5/5/2016 Movement SBT SBR Lan&onf[gurations tO Traffic Volume (vph) 1401 58 Future Volume (vph) 1401 58 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4931 At Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4931 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1523 63 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1584 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 72.5 Effective Green, g (s) 72.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2553 v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 24.0 Progression Factor 0.57 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 Delay (s) 14.6 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 14.3 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2057: 28 Av S & S 304 St 5/5/2016 11. '1-r { '*__ 4% l` Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 'fir Vi + I r Traffic Volume (vph) 171 65 435 249 84 385 Future Volume (vph) 171 65 435 249 84 385 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 6% -2% 4% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (Prot) 1660 1789 1837 1693 1550 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1660 866 1837 1693 1550 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 184 70 468 268 91 418 RTOR Reduction (vph) 10 0 0 0 0 179 Lane Group Flow (vph) 245 0 468 268 91 239 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 2 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#ihr) 1 2 2 it 0 1 Turn Type NA D.P+P _ NA Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 3 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 103.0 108.0 22.0 80.0 Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 103.0 108.0 22.0 80.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.74 0.77 0.16 0.57 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 533 1019 1417 266 941 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.19 0.15 c0.05 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.19 0.34 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 37.8 7.3 4.3 52.6 15.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.1 0.3 3.5 0.6 Delay (s) 38.0 7.4 4.6 56.0 15.7 Level of Service D A A E B Approach Delay (s) 38.0 6.4 22.9 Approach LOS D A C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay _ HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2250: Pacific Hwy S & S 308 St 5/512016 --I -► � "'r- � � fl . t L* ti. Movement E8L EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NSR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 4 4 A ++F* A Traffic Volume (vph) 75 19 32 28 19 70 108 48 1108 26 50 61 Future Volume (vph) 75 19 32 28 19 70 108 48 1108 26 50 61 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 2% 1 % Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 0.97 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1803 1761 5002 1796 Fit Permitted 0.62 0.88 0.95 1.00 0.20 Satd. Flow(perm) 1160 1598 1761 5002 383 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 107 27 46 34 23 84 114 51 1166 27 54 66 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 43 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 170 0 0 98 0 0 165 1192 0 0 120 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 13 13 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #/hr 6 0 11 11 0 6 11 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P D.P+P Protected Phases 4 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.8 22.8 20.5 95.7 101.7 Effective Green, g (s) 21.8 21.8 20.5 95.7 101.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.68 0.73 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 180 248 257 3419 338 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.24 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.06 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.39 0.64 0.35 0.36 Uniform Delay, dl 58.5 53.2 56.3 9.2 11.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.38 0.33 Incremental Delay, d2 50.2 0.4 3.3 0.2 0.2 Delay (s) 108.7 53.5 52.3 3.7 3.8 Level of Service F D D A A Approach Delay (s) 108.7 53.5 9.6 Approach LOS F D A Intersectitsl5umm HCM 2000 Control Delay A&D HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio QD Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2250: Pacific Hwy S & S 308 St 5/512016 Movement SBT SBR Lane'Monfgurations W. Traffic Volume (vph) 1459 92 Future Volume (vph) 1459 92 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5040 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5040 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1586 100 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1682 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% Bus Blockages #!hr 11 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 81.2 Effective Green, g (s) 81.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2923 v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.58 Uniform Delay, dl 18.5 Progression Factor 0.23 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 Delay (s) 4.9 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 4.8 Approach LOS A intersection 8urnmasy Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 Av S & SW 320 St/S 320 St 5/5/2016 mmemm EBL E8',T ESR. WK WBT WBR NBL NET NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ++ F tt if tt if tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 778 355 0 1404 370 0 510 413 0 641 288 Future Volume (vph) 0 778 355 0 1404 370 0 510 413 0 641 288 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -1 % -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3557 1513 3557 1527 3522 1575 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1583 3557 1513 3557 1527 3522 1575 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 778 355 0 1404 370 0 510 413 0 641 288 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 8 0 0 102 0 0 189 0 0 217 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 778 347 0 1404 268 0 510 224 0 641 71 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockaaes F#fhrl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 D Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA cu m(v^ NA Perm Protected Phases c� 6 8 5? 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 99.6 99.6 89.4 89.4 30.4 35.6 30.9 30.9 Effective Green, g (s) 99.6 99.6 89.4 89.4 30.4 35.6 30.9 30.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.64 0.64 0.22 0.25 0.22 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2517 1126 2271 966 772 442 777 347 v/s Ratio Prot 0.22 c0.39 0.14 c0.02 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.18 0.13 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.31 -0.62 0.28 0.66 0.51 0.82 0.21 Uniform Delay, d1 7.5 7.5 15.1 11.1 50.1 44.7 52.0 44.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.7 1.3 0.7 1.7 0.3 6.8 0.1 Delay (s) 7.8 8.2 16.4 11.8 51.7 45.0 58.8 44.6 Level of Service A A B B D D E D Approach Delay (s) 7.9 15.4 48.7 54.4 Approach LOS A B D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 7,& HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio D.68 407.1 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: I Phase conflict between lane groups. c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3046: 8 AV S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 -• 4\ t 4 1 Movement . EBL , EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT+ I +T 4 4) Traffic Volume (vph) 27 1137 6 33 1731 116 5 9 23 107 16 27 Future Volume (vph) 27 1137 6 33 1731 116 5 9 23 107 16 27 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 4% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.92 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.97 Satd. Flow (prot) 1734 3322 1803 3389 1640 1736 Fit Permitted 0.08 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.97 0.81 Satd. Flow (perm) 145 3322 411 3389 1602 1448 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 27 1137 6 33 1731 116 5 9 23 107 16 27 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 20 0 0 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 1143 0 33 1844 0 0 17 0 0 144 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0_ 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm NA _ Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 107.8 102.8 107.8 104.7 18.2 18.2 Effective Green, g (s) 107.8 101.8 107.8 104.7 17.2 18.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.73 0.77 0.75 0.12 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 146 2415 366 2534 196 188 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.34 0.00 c0.54 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.07 0.01 c0.10 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.47 0.09 0.73 0.09 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 9.2 7.9 7.9 9.8 54.4 58.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.53 0.43 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 15.3 Delay (s) 9.4 8.6 4.2 4.7 54.5 74.1 Level of Service A A A A D E Approach Delay (s) 8.6 4.7 54.5 74.1 Approach LOS A A D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 40.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps & S 320 St & 1-5 NB Ramp 5/5/2016 MarriineM EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL SBR NEL2 NEL NER Lane Configurations tt+ in +tt r S e Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1363 621 0 960 222 0 0 398 0 350 Future Volume (vph) 0 1363 621 0 960 222 0 0 398 0 350 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1536 5097 1460 1651 1664 1503 At Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5046 1536 5097 1460 1651 1664 1503 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1363 621 0 960 222 0 0 398 0 350 RTOR Reduction (vph) - 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 16 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1363 621 0 960 159 0 0 199 199 334 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 92.7 140.0 92.7 92.7 37.3 37.3 37.3 Effective Green, g (s) 92.7 140.0 92.7 91.7 37.3 37.3 36.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 1.00 0.66 0.66 0.27 0.27 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3341 1536 3374 956 439 443 389 v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 0.19 0.12 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.11 c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.40 0.28 0.17 0.45 0.45 0.86 Uniform Delay, dl 10.9 0.0 9.8 9.3 42.8 42.8 49.4 Progression Factor 0.23 1.00 0.72 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 16.4 Delay (s) 2.8 0.7 7.3 3.6 43.1 43.1 65.9 Level of Service A A A A D D E Approach Delay (s) 2.1 6.6 0.0 53.7 Approach LOS A A A D Intersection SurnrRary HCM 2000 Control Delay CM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio C :00�P" Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3060: 32 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 ---* --,* 'r ■-- , t Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WB7 WBR NBL NBT NBR 5BL SBT 5BR Lane Configurations tt r fi� Vi T 44 Traffic Volume (vph) 1 1648 28 12 1066 1 109 50 0 1 0 1 Future Volume (vph) 1 1648 28 12 1066 1 109 50 0 1 0 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% 0% -3% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1769 3525 1513 1770 3524 1782 1891 1404 Flt Permitted 0.24 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow(perm) 448 3525 1513 203 3524 1782 1891 1404 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1648 28 12 1066 1 109 50 0 1 0 1 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1648 21 12 1067 0 109 50 0 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 6 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 106.3 104.3 104.3 106.3 105.3 14.2 14.2 1.0 Effective Green, g (s) 106.3 104.3 104.3 106.3 105.3 14.2 14.2 0.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.75 0.10 0.10 0.00 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 349 2626 1127 176 2650 180 191 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.47 c0.00 0.30 c0.06 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.63 0.02 0.07 0.40 0.61 0.26 0.00 Uniform Delay, d1 4.5 8.5 4.6 7.1 6.2 60.2 58.1 70.0 Progression Factor 0.53 0.34 1.00 0.86 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 3.9 0.3 0.0 ' Delay (s) 2.4 3.9 4.6 6.1 5.3 64.1 58.3 70.0 Level of Service A A A A A E E E Approach Delay (s) 3.9 5.3 62.3 70.0 Approach LOS A A E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.6^ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 v1 Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3061: Weyerhaeuser Wy S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 __* f- *-- 4\ /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL INBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tt r tt )y F Traffic Volume (vph) 1615 95 174 1084 150 246 Future Volume (vph) 1615 95 174 1084 150 246 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ubl. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3525 1514 1770 3525 3200 1390 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Said. Flow (perm) 3525 1514 1770 3525 3200 1390 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1615 95 174 1084 150 246 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 107 ill Lane Group Flow (vph) 1615 71 174 1084 164 14 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 0 2 2 2 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 93.0 93.0 17.3 115.3 15.7 15.7 Effective Green, g (s) 93.0 93.0 17.3 115.3 15.7 15.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.12 0.82 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2341 1005 218 2903 358 155 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 c0.10 0.31 c0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.07 0.80 0.37 0.46 0.09 Uniform Delay, dl 14.6 8.3 59.7 3.1 58.2 55.7 Progression Factor 0.30 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 0.1 17.0 0.4 0.3 0.1 Delay (s) 5.7 1.5 76.7 3.5 58.5 55.8 Level of Service A A E A E E Approach Delay (s) 5.5 13.6 57.7 Approach LOS A B E Intersectian Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 ✓ Sum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3650: Pacific Hwy S & S 330 St 5/5/2016 Movement ��........•• •T•••.......•••. EBR WBL WST +IVBR NBU Nf31 NsT fdBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations T. ll� +tT Traffic Volume (vph) 48 18 80 38 16 24 45 55 1471 46 172 34 Future Volume (vph) 48 18 80 38 16 24 45 55 1471 46 172 34 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1745 1633 1715 1669 1752 4963 1787 Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1343 1633 1148 1669 1752 4963 1787 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 48 18 80 38 16 24 45 55 1471 46 172 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 72 0 0 22 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 26 0 38 18 0 0 100 1515 0 0 206 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 6 6 0 6 6 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 15.7 20.0 15.5 14.0 79.8 19.7 Effective Green, g (s) 17.5 14.7 18.0 14.5 14.0 79.8 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.57 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 176 171 160 172 175 2828 251 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.06 c0.31 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.15 0.24 0.11 0.57 0.54 0.82 Uniform Delay, dl 55.6 57.0 55.9 56.9 60.1 18.6 58.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.44 0.63 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 2.1 0.5 11.7 Delay (s) 55.9 57.1 56.2 57.0 45.5 8.7 48.4 Level of Service E E E E D A D Approach Delay (s) 56.7 56.6 11.0 Approach LOS E E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3650: Pacific Hwy S & S 330 St 5/5/2016 1 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lane`Tonfgurations ttl� Traffic Volume (vph) 1858 55 Future Volume (vph) 1858 55 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5064 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5064 _ Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1858 55 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1911 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages #Ihr 6 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 85.5 Effective Green, g (s) 85.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3092 v/s Ratio Prot c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 17.0 Progression Factor 1.45 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 Delay (s) 25.2 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 27.5 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU 56L Lane Configurations + r TT4 M ttll< Traffic Volume (vph) 409 375 421 184 403 116 14 290 1098 86 27 84 Future Volume (vph) 409 375 421 184 403 116 14 290 1098 86 27 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 At Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1717 1853 1516 1731 3373 3368 4897 1796 Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) _ 446 1853 1516 388 _ 3373 3368 4897 1796 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 409 375 421 184 403 116 14 290 1098 86 27 84 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 117 0 21 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 409 375 304 184 498 0 0 304 1178 0 0 111 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 4 4 2 6 4 2 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 48.9 36.1 36.1 48.9 30.4 13.0 58.1 12.5 Effective Green, g (s) 48.9 36.1 36.1 48.9 30.4 13.0 58.1 12.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.22 0.09 0.42 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 323 477 390 258 732 312 2032 160 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.20 0.07 0.15 c0.09 0.24 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.27 0.20 0.18 v/c Ratio 1.27 0.79 0.78 0.71 0.68 0.97 0.58 0.69 Uniform Delay, dl 39.7 48.4 48.2 35.3 50.3 63.3 31.5 61.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.97 0.93 0.76 Incremental Delay, d2 142.2 7.7 8.7 7.5 2.1 38.9 1.0 8.7 Delay (s) 181.9 56.1 56.9 42.8 52.4 100.0 30.3 55.8 Level of Service F E E D D F C E Approach Delay (s) 99.1 49.9 44.5 Approach LOS F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay CM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio C)II/Isurn Z Actuated Cycle Length (s) of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 5/512016 4/ tkver opt_ SBT SBR LaneMonfigurations ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 1555 352 Future Volume (vph) 1555 352 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 Lane Util, Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5134 1556 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 5134 1556 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1555 352 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1555 290 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 2 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 57.6 76.1 Effective Green, g (s) 57.6 76.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2112 845 v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.34 Uniform Delay, dl 34.8 17.9 Progression Factor 0.70 0.48 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 0.1 Delay (s) 26.5 8.7 Level of Service C A Approach Delay (s) 25.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4250: Pacific Hwy S & S 340 PI/16 Av S 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR Wt3L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations T+ + ri W. )) W, Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 26 43 86 1355 82 605 26 1130 1230 2 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 26 43 86 1355 82 605 26 1130 1230 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -5% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 1799 1909 2752 1752 4972 3454 5121 At Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (Perm) 1583 1799 1909 2752 266 4972 3454 5121 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 26 43 86 1355 82 605 26 1130 1230 2 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 0 170 0 4 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3 0 43 86 1185 82 627 0 1130 1232 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#fhr)- 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 2 2 2 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov D,P+P NA Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.2 35.3 54.5 94.4 70.0 30.1 39.9 62.2 Effective Green, g (s) 14.2 35.3 54.5 92.4 70.0 30.1 39.9 62.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.25 0.39 0.66 0.50 0.22 0.28 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 160 453 743 1944 215 1068 984 2275 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.02 0.05 c0.17 0.02 c0.13 c0.33 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.09 0.12 0.61 0.38 0.59 1.15 0.54 Uniform Delay, d1 56.6 40.1 27.3 13.5 20.3 49.4 50.0 28.5 Progression Factor 1.00 0.89 0.75 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.54 0.38 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.5 76.0 0.7 Delay (s) 56.6 35.8 20.6 7.9 20.7 49.9 103.2 11.4 Level of Service E D C A C D F B Approach Delay (s) 56.6 9.4 46.5 55.3 Approach LOS E A D E Intersection Summ HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 / Actuated Cycle Length (s) ✓ Sum of lost time (s) 21.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4550: 16 Av S & S 344 St 5/5/2016 � � � Or � � � t 1 M91tel"rit E13L EBT EHR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations % I 1a t7+ T>a Traffic Volume (vph) 6 36 72 134 34 90 65 898 47 139 954 19 Future Volume (vph) 6 36 72 134 34 90 65 898 47 139 954 19 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -5% 3% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1724 1630 1787 1665 1743 3437 1777 3528 Flt Permitted 0.60 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.23 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1088 1630 1074 1665 432 3437 436 3528 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 36 72 134 34 90 65 898 47 139 954 19 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 57 0 0 69 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 51 0 134 55 0 65 943 0 139 972 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA D_.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.2 19.0 32.2 31.1 88.8 80.0 88.8 84.7 Effective Green, g (s) 32.2 19.0 32.2 31.1 88.8 80.0 88.8 84.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.14 0.23 0.22 0.63 0.57 0.63 0.61 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 221 314 369 312 1964 360 2134 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.03 c0.04 0.03 0.01 c0.27 c0.02 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.06 0.13 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.23 0.43 0.15 0.21 0.48 0.39 0.46 Uniform Delay, dl 41.7 54.0 44.9 43.8 18.9 17.7 22.9 15.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.08 1.60 0.72 1.34 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 41.7 54.2 45.2 43.9 39.3 28.9 16.6 20.3 Level of Service D D D D D C B C Approach Delay (s) 53.5 44.6 29.6 19.9 Approach LOS D D C B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio �.4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 19 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkwv S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 5/5/2016 Movement. EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations S ttt r ))) ttt r b) tT+ r Traffic Volume (vph) 4 109 1192 333 985 1543 459 162 303 593 527 520 Future Volume (vph) 4 109 1192 333 985 1543 459 162 303 593 527 520 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade(%) 2% -4% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1738 5034 1519 5077 5173 1559 3385 3206 1408 3467 At Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1738 5034 1519 5077 5173 1559 3385 3206 1408 3467 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 109 1192 333 985 1543 459 162 303 593 527 520 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 100 0 0 227 0 0 19 51 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 113 1192 233 985 1543 232 0 465 758 292 520 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.5 37.5 37.5 28.0 54.0 54.0 21.7 33.0 61.0 22.0 Effective Green, g (s) 11.5 37.5 37.5 28.0 54.0 54.0 21.7 33.0 61.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.39 0.39 0.15 0.24 0.44 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 142 1348 406 1015 1995 601 524 755 663 544 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.24 c0.19 0.30 0.14 c0.24 0.09 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.15 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.88 0.57 0.97 0.77 0.39 0.89 1.00 0.44 0.96 Uniform Delay, d1 63.1 49.2 44.4 55.6 37.6 31.0 58.0 53.5 27.6 58.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.81 0.51 0.85 Incremental Delay, d2 24.2 8.7 5.8 21.2 3.0 1.9 15.1 32.4 0.2 26.7 Delay (s) 87.3 57.9 50.2 76.8 40.6 32.9 62.6 75.7 14.1 76.6 Level of Service F E D E D C E E B E Approach Delay (s) 58.4 51.4 58.6 Approach LOS E D E Intersection Summ HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 20 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkw S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 5/5/2016 l 4/ Movement SBT SBR Laronfigurations tt'+ Traffic Volume (vph) 776 150 Future Volume (vph) 776 150 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.98 At Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4981 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 4981 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 776 150 RTOR Reduction (vph) 20 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 906 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages #!br 2 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 32.8 Effective Green, g (s) 32.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1166 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 Uniform Delay, d1 50.2 Progression Factor 0.83 Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 Delay (s) 44.6 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 56.1 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5050: Enchanted Pkwx S & S 352 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WET WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations Tt' i I t r +T+ I 4t r Traffic Volume (vph) 26 6 JD 253 8 313 7 895 218 205 1411 40 Future Volume (vph) 26 6 30 253 8 313 7 895 218 205 1411 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% -11% 0% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1730 1588 1835 1965 1636 1770 3391 1760 3507 1497 At Permitted 0.75 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 1588 1417 1965 1636 255 3391 344 3507 1497 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 26 6 30 253 8 313 7 895 218 205 1411 40 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 27 0 0 0 266 0 11 0 0 0 13 Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 9 0 253 8 47 7 1102 0 205 1411 27 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blocka es #/hr 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA pm+ov D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 1 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 4 3 6 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.4 15.1 24.4 9.3 22.8 96.1 82.6 96.1 95.1 95.1 Effective Green, g (s) 22.4 14.1 22.4 8.3 20.8 96.1 82.6 96.1 95.1 95.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.10 0.16 0.06 0.15 0.69 0.59 0.69 0.68 0.68 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 159 251 116 313 185 2000 372 2382 1016 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 c0.06 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.33 c0.05 c0.40 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.10 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.06 1.01 0.07 0.15 0.04 0.55 0.55 0.59 0.03 Uniform Delay, dl 50.1 56.9 56.9 62.2 51.9 9.5 17.4 11.0 12.0 7.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.62 0.81 1.75 0.62 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 58.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 Delay (s) 50.2 57.0 115.8 62.3 52.0 5.9 15.1 19.8 8.1 7.4 Level of Service D E F E D A B B A A Approach Delay (s) 54.1 80.2 15.0 9.5 Approach LOS D F B A Intersection Summary l� HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) Description: c Critical Lane Group yHCM 2000 Level of Service C 0.59 Q�� s��`'� �3 Sum of lost time (s) 22.5 77.3% ICU Level of Service D 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5251: Enchanted Pkwy S & S 356 St 5/5/2016 -A t Maverirerif_ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r T. tT tt Traffic Volume (vph) 225 10 278 30 72 6 422 1056 53 9 1244 6 Future Volume (vph) 225 10 278 30 72 6 422 1056 53 9 1244 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fr{ 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1746 1525 1743 1837 3450 3509 1761 3504 At Permitted 0.6� 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1131 1525 693 1837 3450 3509 1761 3504 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 225 10 278 30 72 6 422 1056 53 9 1244 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 215 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 235 63 30 76 0 422 1108 0 9 1250 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #mr 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 30.8 30.8 31.3 31.3 19.0 92.7 2.0 75.7 Effective Green, g (s) 31.8 31.8 33.3 33.3 21.0 93.7 2.0 77.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.15 0.67 0.01 0.56 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 256 346 164 436 517 2348 25 1944 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.12 0.32 0.01 c0.36 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.04 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.18 0.18 0.17 0.82 0.47 0.36 0.64 Uniform Delay, dl 52.8 43.6 42.5 42.4 57.6 11.2 68.4 21.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 34.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 9.2 0.7 3.2 1.7 Delay (s) 87.0 43.7 42.7 42.5 66.8 11.9 71.6 23.2 Level of Service F D D D E B E C Approach Delay (s) 63.6 42.5 27.0 23.5 Approach LOS E D C C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) ./ Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 23 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 451: Pacific Hwx S & 16 Av S 5/5/2016 f1 '� t 1 *j Movement NBU NBL NBT SBT SBR 5EL SEP, Lane Configurations !ii ttt ttT+ Traffic Volume (veh/h) 84 161 1071 1975 13 0 312 Future Volume (Veh/h) 84 161 1071 1975 13 0 312 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade -3% 2% 4% Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.84 0.84 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 168 1116 2147 14 0 371 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 • 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockagk 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 989 pX, platoon unblocked C vC, conflicting volume 2171 82 743 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 0 21 r 2882 743 tC, single (s) 0.0 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 0.0 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 0 30 100 0 cM capacity (veh/h) 0 240 4 352 Direcbon, Lane # NB 1 NB NB 3 NB 4 1 SS 2 SB 3 SE 1 Volume Total 168 2 372 372 85 859 443 371 Volume Left 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 14 371 1722 1700 Volume to Cap00 Vol 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 6 1.06 ZaQ.7Q Queue Length Control Delay (48.7 Lane LOSE Approach Dela6.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 98.5 F 98.5Approach LOS Intersection Su F Average Del# 11.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 451: Pacific Hwy S & 16 Av S 5/6/2016 fl '� T l �' Movement NBU NBL NBT SBT SBR SEL SER Lane Configurations t ttt tO r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 84 161 1071 1975 13 0 312 Future Volume (Veh/h) 84 161 1071 1975 13 0 312 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade -3% 2% 4% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 161 1071 1975 13 0 312 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (fUs) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 989 pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 0 1998 2680 685 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 0 1998 2680 685 tC, single (s) 0.0 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 0.0 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 0 43 100 19 cM capacity (veh/h) 0 281 7 384 Direction, Lane ft N81 NB 2 NB 3 NB 4 SB 1 S6 2 SB 3 SE 1 Volume Total 161 357 357 357 790 790 408 312 Volume Left 161 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 312 cSH 281 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 184, Volume to Capacity 0.57 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.46 0.46 0.24 .81 Queue Length 95th (ft) 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 Control Delay (s) 33.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.4 Lane LOS D E Approach Delay (s) 4.4 0.0 44.4 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 750: Pacific Hwy S & S 283 PI 5/5/2016 4- t L* 1 Movement W8L WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL 5BT Lane Configurations r ttT b tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 46 1238 17 7 92 2248 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 46 1238 17 7 92 2248 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade -11 % -3% 3% Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.98 0.98 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 56 1346 18 0 94 2294 Pedestrians 8 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 2326 476 0 1372 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2326 476 0 1372 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 0.0 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 0.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 90 0 81 cM capacity (veh/h) 26 534 0 493 Direction, Larne # W81 NB 1 NS 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 56 538 538 287 94 765 765 765 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 94 0 0 0 Volume Right 56 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 cSH 534 1700 1100 1700 493 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.17 0 0. 0.4 0.45 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 12.5 0.0 0.6 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1751: Pacific Hwy S & 18 AV S 5/5/2016 f- 4- t Movement WBL W8R NET NBR SSU SBL SBT Lane Configurations r ttll� N ++ Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 55 1198 58 3 24 1685 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 55 1198 58 3 24 1685 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade -10% -4% 3% Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 75 1235 60 0 26 1832 Pedestrians 2 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 10.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 720 pX, platoon unblocked 0.77 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 1940 454 0 1297 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1188 454 0 1297 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 0.0 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 0.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 86 0 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 135 554 0 535 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 75 494 494 307 26 611 611 611 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 Volume Right 75 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 cSH 554 1700 1700 ""1700 535 t3 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.0 0.3 0.360 0.36 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 0 0 0 4 Control Delay (s) 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 12.5 0.0 0.2 Approach LOS B Intersection summary _ Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2551: 18 Av S & S 312 St 5/17/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBt_ NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations TT4 'i tT *T r *T+ Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 452 95 9 565 49 68 12 12 28 16 49 Future Volume (Veh/h) 30 452 95 9 565 49 68 12 12 28 16 49 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 5% -5% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 476 100 9 577 50 88 16 16 35 20 61 Pedestrians 11 12 10 12 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.5 10.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) 4 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 631 659 pX, platoon unblocked 0.96 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.96 vC, conflicting volume 639 586 988 1257 310 954 1282 336 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 600 600 632 632 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 388 657 322 650 vCu, unblocked vol 552 373 682 969 73 645 995 238 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 99 80 96 98 92 95 92 cM capacity (veh/h) 977 1084 440 389 885 444 395 729 dirwtiQri,1 ne # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 32 317 259 9 385 242 120 116 Volume Left 32 0 0 9 0 0 88 35 Volume Right 0 0 100 0 0 50 16 61 cSH 977 1700 1700 1084 1700 1700 544 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.19 0.15 0.01 0.23 0.14 0.24 0.21 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 1 0 0 20 Control Delay (s) 8.8 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 15.0 13.4 Lane LOS A A C B Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.1 15.0 13.4 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2753:21 PIS&S316St Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T, + r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 140 64 49 160 194 42 Future Volume (Veh/h) 140 64 49 160 194 42 Sign Control free Free Stop Grade 0% 1 % 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.92 0.92 0.72 0.72 Hourly flow rate (vph) 169 77 53 174 269 58 Pedestrians 20 21 21 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ftts) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 2 2 2 Right turn flare (veh) 12 Median type TWLTL TWLTL V ►� Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 523 ` 460 pX, platoon unblocked 3 vC, conflicting volume 267 2 vC1, stage 1 conf vol A # T228 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 300 - x vCu, unblocked vol 267 528 20 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.3, tC, 2 stage (s) 5-5 tF (s) 2.2 3.6 p0 Queue free % 96 57 cM capacity (veh/h) 1274 v 629 75. Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 5/17/2016 Volume Total 246 53 174 d 327 a J Volume Left 0 53 0 1E Volume Right 77 0 0 cSH 1700 1274 1700 Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) 0.14 0 0.04 3 0.10 0Control Delay (s) 0.0 7.9 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.9 14.1 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 6.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 1 ea 2. �g ❑0 t o a � n o v Cl HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2350: Pacific Hwy S & S 310 St 5/5/2016 Movement 4- WBL t WBR t NBT /' NBR `► SSL I SBT Lane Configurations r tttl +++ Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 50 1125 56 0 1693 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 50 1125 56 0 1693 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 1 % 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 64 1197 60 0 1881 Pedestrians 16 16 12 Lane Width (ft) 10.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 660 662 pX, platoon unblocked 0.87 0.84 0.84 vC, conflicting volume 1886 457 1273 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 298 0 680 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 93 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 574 902 759: Direction, Lane# WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 64 479 479 299 627 627 627 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 64 0 0 60 0 0 0 cSH 902 1700 1700 170�fO. Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.1 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 9.3 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2557: 28 Av S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 -1, i --v 'r- -*--- t 4\ t �► 1 -V Movement E BL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N8T NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations 4?- 4. 4 *T r Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) 307 2 76 2 0 0 122 206 2 0 185 347 Future Volume (vph) 307 2 76 2 0 0 122 206 2 0 185 347 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 307 2 76 2 0 0 122 206 2 0 185 347 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total (vph) 385 2 330 185 347 Volume Left (vph) 307 2 122 0 0 Volume Right (vph) 76 0' 2 0 347 Hadj (s) 0.06 0.20 0.10 0.02 -0.68 Departure Headway (s) 7.4 6.2 6.4 5.7 Degree Utilization, x 0.65 0.00 0.56 0.33 0.54 Capacity (veh/h) 380 556 544 615 Control Delay (s) 19.8 10.4 16.8 11.2 14.0 Approach Delay (s) 19.8 10.4 16.8 13.0 Approach LOS C B C B Intersection Summ Delay 16.1 Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3031: SW 320 St & 14 Wy SW 5/512016 A ueii nt OIL. EBT WBT Wok SBL. SCR Lane Configurations Vi tt tT Y Traffic Volume (vehlh) 13 705 1311 22 13 35 Future Volume (Vehlh) 13 705 1311 22 13 35 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 705 1311 22 13 35 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (f /s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1343 1720 686 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1332 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 388 vCu, unblocked vol 1343 1720 686 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 93 91 cM capacity (vehlh) 505 198 383 pigidem LMie# ES 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 13 352 352 874 459 48 Volume Left 13 0 0 0 0 13 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 22 35 cSH 505 1700 1700 1700 306 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.21 0.2 0.51 0.27 0.16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 14 Control Delay (s) 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.0 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 19.0 Approach LOS C Intersection 5umm . Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3032: 13 PI SW & SW 320 St 5/5/2016 MdWmebf EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 0 °i ft Y Traffic Volume (veh/h) 712 9 83 1333 3 58 Future Volume (Veh/h) 712 9 83 1333 3 58 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1% -1% 2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 712 9 83 1333 3 58 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 731 1569 380 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 726 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 842 vCu, unblocked vol 731 1569 380 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 90 99 90 cM capacity (veh/h) 862 276 607 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 475 246 83 666 666 61 Volume Left 0 0 83 0 0 3 Volume Right 0 9 0 0 0 58 cSH 1700 1700 862 0 573 Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.14 0.1 0.39 Q.39 0.11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 8 9 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 12.0 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 12.0 Approach LOS B intersection Summary Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3033: 11 PI SW & SW 320 St 5/5/2016 -10. -1* 41- *-- 4\ /11, Movement EBT EBR WSL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations +T+ t+ Y Traffic Volume (veh/h) 764 5 49 1407 4 36 Future Volume (Veh/h) 764 5 49 1407 4 36 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1 % -1 % -13% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 764 5 49 1407 4 36 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 779 1588 404 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 776 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 812 vCu, unblocked vol 779 1588 404 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 94 99 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 827 285 587 Direction. Larne* EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 509 260 49 704 704 40 Volume Left 0 0 49 0 0 4 Volume Right 0 5 0 0 0 36 cSH 1700 1700 827 0 530 Volume to Capacity 0.30 0.15 0.0 0.41 .41 0.08 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 5 0 6 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 12.3 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 12.3 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 8 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3034: SW 320 St & 10 PI SW 5/5/2016 _,* __a. 4�, \,. Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR 5BL SBR Lane Configurations Vi tt +T Y Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 795 1439 33 15 5 Future Volume (Veh/h) 5 795 1439 33 15 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1 % 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 795 1439 33 15 5 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1482 1883 756 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1466 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 418 vCu, unblocked vol 1482 1883 756 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 91 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 446 169 345 Direction, Lane # EB 1 ES 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SS 1 Volume Total 5 398 398 959 513 20 Volume Left 5 0 0 0 0 15 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 33 5 446 170 1.30 94 Volume to Capacity Vol 0.01 0.23 0.23 0.2 0.58 0.30 .10 0.19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 9 Control Delay (s) 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.7 Lane LOS B D Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 25.7 Approach LOS D Intersection Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 9 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3036: SW 320 St & 7 AV SW 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations I f f T1, Y Traffic Volume (vehm) 6 808 1489 21 9 4 Future Volume (Veh/h) 6 808 1489 21 9 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 1 % Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 6 808 1489 21 9 4 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1520 1936 775 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1510 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 426 vCu, unblocked vol 1520 1936 775 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 94 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 431 160 335 Direction, Lane i~ EB 1 EB 2 ES 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 6 404 404 993 517 13 Volume Left 6 0 0 0 0 9 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 21 4 cSH 431 1700 1700 1700 191 Volume to Capacity 0.01 0.24 0. 0,58,1 0.30 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 5 Control Delay (s) 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.3 Lane LOS B D Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 25.3 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service B. Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 10 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3037: 6 PI SW & SW 320 St 5/5/2016 --4. --v f- ~ 4\ /0. Movement EST EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations +T4 Vi tt r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 818 20 103 1389 11 46 Future Volume (Veh/h) 818 20 103 1389 11 46 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade -2% 0% -1 % Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 818 20 103 1389 11 46 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 4 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 1016 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 838 1728 419 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 828 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 900 vCu, unblocked vol 838 1728 419 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 87 96 92 cM capacity (veh/h) 792 246 583 Direction.1ane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 545 293 103 694 694 57 Volume Left 0 0 103 0 0 11 Volume Right 0 20 0 0 0 46 cSH 1700 1700 792 00 722 Volume to Capacity 0.32 0.17 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.08 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 11 6 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 13.4 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 13.4 Approach LOS B Intersecfion Summary Average Delay 0.8 _ - Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 11 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3043: 5 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 --* ---* f- '- 4\ I} Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations TT.31 '� ff er Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1112 7 98 1697 7 75 Future Volume (Veh/h) 1112 7 98 1697 7 75 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1% -2% 2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1112 7 98 1697 7 75 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) 4 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 980 1157 pX, platoon unblocked 0.69 vC, conflicting volume 1129 2180 580 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1126 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 1054 vCu, unblocked vol 1129 1808 580 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 84 97 83 cM capacity (veh/h) 609 229 450 Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WS 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 741 378 98 848 848 82 Volume Left 0 0 98 0 0 7 Volume Right 0 7 0 0 0 75 cSH 1700 609 42 Volume to Capacity 0.44 0.22 .16 .17 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 14 15 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 15.2 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 15.2 Approach LOS C Intersection Summa Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 12 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3047: 10 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBT EBR WBL VVBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations +T+ I f f r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1255 3 64 1882 0 36 Future Volume (Veh/h) 1255 3 64 1882 0 36 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 2% -4% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1255 3 64 1882 0 36 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 520 661 pX, platoon unblocked 0.86 0.68 0.86 vC, conflicting volume 1268 2346 649 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1266 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 1079 vCu, unblocked vol 981 1103 259 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 89 100 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 595 257 624 Direction, Lane# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 837 421 64 941 941 36 Volume Left 0 0 64 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 3 0 0 0 36 cSH 1700 1700 595 624 Volume to Capacity 0.49 0.25 0.11 0.55 0.55 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 9 5 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 11.1 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 11.1 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 13 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3451: 17 Av S & S 324 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r OT,. if r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 399 91 148 553 5 0 0 151 0 0 92 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 399 91 148 553 5 0 0 151 0 0 92 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 2% -1 % -1 % -1 % Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 399 91 148 553 5 0 0 151 0 0 92 Pedestrians 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) 383 pX, platoon unblocked 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 vC, conflicting volume 568 500 991 1273 419 1422 1362 207 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 409 409 862 862 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 582 864 560 500 vCu, unblocked vol 568 417 949 1254 330 1415 1350 207 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 86 100 100 75 100 100 88 cM capacity (veh/h) 992 1042 319 289 605 175 263 786 Direction, lane # EnB t EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 399 91 286 276 143 151 92 Volume Left 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 91 0 0 5 151 92 1723 1700 786 Volume to Capacity Vol 0.23 0.05 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.25 0.12 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 12 0 0 10 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 12.9 10.2 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 12.9 10.2 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summa Average Delay 3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 14 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3550: Pacific Hwy S & S 328 St 5/5/2016 _# --t 4% t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r +tt ttl� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 52 0 1668 2055 37 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 52 0 1668 2055 37 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% -2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 52 0 1668 2055 37 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 641 pX, platoon unblocked 0.82 vC, conflicting volume 2650 724 2102 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2237 724 2102 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 86 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 29 362 256 direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 52 556 556 556 822 822 448 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 52 0 0 0 0 0 37 cSH 362 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.33 �.41 0.4$ 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 16.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C Approach Delay (s) 16.6 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 intersection Capacity Utilization 55.7% IOU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3750: Pacific Hwy S & S 332 St 5/5/2016 �--,* fl 4\ t I d Movement ESL EBR NBU NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations ?f h ttt tt-1. Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 39 52 40 1731 2066 31 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 39 52 40 1731 2066 31 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 2% -2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 39 0 40 1731 2066 31 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (f /s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 680 pX, platoon unblocked 0.76 0.76 0.00 0.76 vC, conflicting volume 2738 704 0 2097 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2190 0 0 1349 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 0.0 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 0.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 95 0 90 cM capacity (veh/h) 26 827 0 386 Direction Jane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 NB 4 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 39 40 577 577 577 826 826 444 Volume Left 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 cSH 827 386 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.10 0.34 0.34 0.34 ;0.49 0.49 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 9.6 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) 9.6 0.3 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.5% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 16 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3850: Pacific Hwy S & S 333 St 5/5/2016 t L* Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBIi 581- SBT Lane Configurations if TTT, N ++T Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 62 1568 42 93 64 1939 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 62 1568 42 93 64 1939 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade -2% 2% -2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 62 1568 42 0 64 1939 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 890 1110 pX, platoon unblocked 0.87 0.83 0.00 0.83 vC, conflicting volume 2383 564 0 1620 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 745 0 0 1037 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 0.0 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 0.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 93 0 88 cM capacity (veh/h) 263 887 0 549 Direction Lane# WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SS 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 62 627 627 356 64 646 646 646 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 Volume Right 62 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 cSH 887 1700 1700 1700 549 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.12 0.38 0.38 0.38 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 0 10 0 Control Delay (s) 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 9.4 0.0 0.4 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary _ Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 17 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4350: 16 Av S & S 341 PI 5/5/2016 f- 4- t Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR S8L SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 40 960 43 31 1066 Future Volume (Veh/h) 48 40 960 43 31 1066 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% -5% -1% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 48 40 960 43 31 1066 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 805 pX, platoon unblocked 40,164. •'-•-1. .A vC, conflicting volume 13 vv3a vC1, stage 1 conf Vol vC2, stage 2 conf Vol F"t �""' "°� �vCu, unblocked Vol tC, single (s) ,^_ $3 .T. . x-ti�rd; y+ w' :i *r* + TM L37 ,eD WOW, -r 7 .. t 6 8 9 'lo �''.°a �- k.,Ha1: a .v.r�s ra'✓,nr .¢ sa� i tC, 2 stage (s) �5:$- ,t+d, tF (s) p0 queue free % 85 3.3 cM capacity (veh/h) 28 821 783 Direction, Lane # VILE 1 - ;, Volume Total 88 640 363 31 533 533 Volume Left 48 0 0 31 0 0 Volume Right 40 0 43 0 0 0 cSH 451 1700 783 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.20 .3 Queue Length 95th (ft)i]► Control Delay (s) 9• --- Lane LOS 0.0 A 0.3 Approach Delay (s) 14.9 11111111611111111 lot,; r�wn Approach LOS ' "^ rra ""' .4�>�two Intersection Summary t5LA is Average Delay AWON PIT Intersection Capacity Utilizat n W400j.A iICU1revel of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 _ p -^— Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Background Scenario Page 18 CITY REVIEW led 0 Note At [s f+liten ❑❑ �a e� —tn cayiew it for genMal ronforrr[anre with the dnrgn concept andonb eomn+ents shall not tte tonstiued as relrering the (onvanar from im r wt do[unsenSs Mal'myf or �rd spldfrtatigss Rai drpartwes thvelrom. the Contrr OW re'Am resyon� with ils an Opu, .1ni 000100" NA rairi�itiM !1f Tr �., � I Na +dltae: ofaper[a6iX wjars this *0* in i �� 1Mnlirs elye�ffaisral Fft UM#& Are %fr"w¢ wA WU h C"Xev w fiESPO, fhl t?iilAEap ❑ ❑ ❑ ;*;"�r. of Confo me with 0 �t t�nstmed as relrn the eos gn concept and carHra—� � �o0":9 c�� HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2549: 14 Av S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 m ovemerrt_ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations to 4T-Ir 4+ *T r Traffic Volume (vph) 73 590 34 26 808 45 52 15 16 58 9 64 Future Volume (vph) 73 590 34 26 808 45 52 15 16 58 9 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 11 11 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1787 3408 1770 3376 1764 1761 1536 Fit Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.97 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 432 3408 713 3376 1764 1761 1536 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.84 0.84 0.84 Adj. Flow (vph) 75 608 35 30 929 52 83 24 25 69 11 76 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 70 Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 641 0 30 979 0 0 126 0 0 80 6 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 20 20 27 39 8 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blocka es #/hr 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Split NA Split NA Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 6 6 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 97.2 93.9 97.2 83.2 14.2 10.6 10.6 Effective Green, g (s) 97.2 93.9 97.2 83.2 14.2 10.6 10.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.67 0.69 0.59 0.10 0.08 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 435 2285 519 2006 178 133 116 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.19 0.00 c0.29 c0.07 c0.05 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.17 0.28 0.06 0.49 0.71 0.60 0.05 Uniform Delay, d1 15.2 9.3 6.8 16.2 60.9 62.7 60.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.55 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.7 9.9 5.2 0.1 Delay (s) 15.3 9.7 3.7 11.1 70.8 67.8 60.1 Level of Service B A A B E E E Approach Delay (s) 10.2 10.9 70.8 64.1 Approach LOS B B E E Intefsectian HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 1 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1 % ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 � --I. "r 'I- fl 4\ fi Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR,- SBU SBL Lane Configurations I fl ti.) M ttT* !1i Traffic Volume (vph) 201 345 120 143 481 117 30 202 883 80 79 134 Future Volume (vph) 201 345 120 143 481 117 30 202 883 80 79 134 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 1% 0% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util, Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1733 3250 1754 3267 3439 4982 1773 Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 353 3250 617 3267 3439 4982 1773 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 218 375 130 157 529 129 31 208 910 82 86 146 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 26 0 0 15 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 479 0 157 643 0 0 239 985 0 0 232 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 33 18 64 15 52 34 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 2 4 4 4 6 4 4 6 2 6 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 50.6 41.0 51.1 36.5 13.2 42.4 27.0 Effective Green, g (s) 48.6 40.0 49.1 35.5 13.2 42.4 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.29 0.35 0.25 0.09 0.30 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 928 290 828 324 1508 341 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.15 0.04 0.20 0.07 c0.20 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.52 0.54 0.78 0.74 0.65 0.68 Uniform Delay, dl 52.3 41.9 33.0 48.6 61.7 42.4 52.5 Progression Factor 0.85 0.89 0.85 0.86 0.84 0.73 0.60 Incremental Delay, d2 24.4 0.2 1.1 4.2 6.5 2.0 3.8 Delay (s) 69.0 37.3 29.2 46.0 58.3 32.9 35.3 Level of Service E D C D E C D Approach Delay (s) 46.9 42.7 37.8 Approach LOS D D D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.7 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 %/ Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2550: Pacific Hwy S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 4/ Movement SBT SBR LanEMonfigurations TTT 11 Traffic Volume (vph) 1196 220 Future Volume (vph) 1196 220 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5108 1460 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 5108 1460 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1300 239 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 48 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1300 191 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 45 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockaqes (#/hr) 4 4 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 56.2 70.3 Effective Green, g (s) 56.2 68.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.49 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2050 712 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.27 Uniform Delay, dl 33.6 21.1 Progression Factor 0.41 0.33 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.1 Delay (s) 15.1 7.0 Level of Service B A Approach Delay (s) 16.6 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2552: 20 Av S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 --* --I. --* 'r '- 4\ t 1* \I. 1 4/ Mnvement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL N8T NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT tTA *T r 41 Traffic Volume (vph) 4 361 130 109 489 23 178 37 125 21 24 4 Future Volume (vph) 4 361 130 109 489 23 178 37 125 21 24 4 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 11 12 11 12 Grade (%) 5% 4% -1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1737 3182 1816 3478 1831 1517 1774 At Permitted 0.42 1.00 0.43 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.67 Satd. Flow (2erm) 761 3182 813 3478 1384 1517 1221 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.76 0.76 0.76 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 397 143 124 556 26 189 39 133 28 32 5 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 108 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 525 0 124 581 0 0 228 25 0 62 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 7 6 7 1 9 3 5 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#ihr) 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 98.4 89.1 98.9 97.4 27.1 27.1 27.6 Effective Green, g (s) 98.4 89.1 98.9 97.4 26.1 26.1 26.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.64 0.71 0.70 0.19 0.19 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 541 2025 644 2419 258 282 231 _ v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.16 c0.01 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.12 c0.16 0.02 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.26 0.19 0.24 0.88 0.09 0.27 Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 11.1 8.9 7.8 55.5 47.1 48.4 Progression Factor 0.79 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.27 3.48 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.2 26.8 0.0 0.2 Delay (s) 5.8 10.5 8.9 8.0 97.5 163.8 48.6 Level of Service A B A A F F D Approach Delay (s) 10.5 8.2 121.9 48.6 Approach LOS B A F D Intersection Summ HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 15.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2554: 23 Av S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 --► � f � 10\ tAll Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations t r �i t '� f Traffic Volume (vph) 329 143 50 399 210 65 Future Volume (vph) 329 143 50 399 210 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) -8% 8% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1891 1552 1702 1791 1755 1464 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1891 1552 1702 1791 1755 1464 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.93 Adj. Flow (vph) 366 159 56 443 226 70 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 57 0 0 0 59 Lane Group Flow (vph) 366 102 56 443 226 11 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 6 9 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 2 2 2 0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 6 5 2 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 89.7 89.7 13.2 108.4 22.6 22.6 Effective Green, g (s) 89.7 89.7 12.2 108.4 21.6 22.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.09 0.77 0.15 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1211 994 148 1386 270 236 v/s Ratio Prot 0.19 0.03 c0.25 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.10 0.38 0.32 0.84 0.05 Uniform Delay, dl 11.2 9.7 60.3 4.7 57.5 49.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.79 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.6 18.7 0.0 Delay (s) 11.8 9.9 60.9 5.3 68.5 89.1 Level of Service B A E A E F Approach Delay (s) 11.3 11.6 73.4 Approach LOS B B E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43 f Actuated Cycle Length (s) V Sum of lost time (s) 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2652: 20 AV S & S 314 St 5/5/2016 Mavaiier(t EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ I. T+ Vi T* Traffic Volume (vph) 22 9 73 110 16 33 56 274 45 27 205 11 Future Volume (vph) 22 9 73 110 16 33 56 274 45 27 205 11 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 3% 1 % 4% -5% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1743 1485 1767 1624 1759 1747 1822 1845 Flt Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.50 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1320 1485 1027 1624 1070 1747 963 1845 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.82 0.82 0.82 Adj. Flow (vph) 26 11 87 131 19 39 64 311 51 33 250 13 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 80 0 0 33 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 18 0 131 25 0 64 359 0 33 262 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 8 4 9 4 9 5 8 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% Turn Type ❑,P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.3 12.7 26.3 22.0 94.7 92.3 95.7 89.6 Effective Green, g (s) 24.3 11.7 24.3 21.0 92.7 91.3 93.7 88.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.08 0.17 0.15 0.66 0.65 0.67 0.63 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 239 124 244 243 728 1139 659 1167 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.01 c0.05 0.02 c0.00 c0.21 0.00 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.04 0.06 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.15 0.54 0.10 0.09 0.32 0.05 0.22 Uniform Delay, dl 48.5 59.5 51.7 51.4 8.3 10.7 8.0 11.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.85 0.68 0.73 1.22 1.12 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.4 Delay (s) 48.6 59.7 48.8 43.5 5.7 8.5 9.8 12.7 Level of Service D E D D A A A B Approach Delay (s) 57.4 47.1 8.1 12.4 Approach LOS E D A B intersecfion Surnma HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio r 0.36 I Actuated Cycle Length (s) . ✓ Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2654: 23 AV S & S 314 St 5/5/2016 -';� 'f - t Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SB T SBR Lane Configurations 4), 41 1 il' Traffic Volume (vph) 7 0 160 2 2 4 71 271 7 3 195 15 Future Volume (vph) 7 0 160 2 2 4 71 271 7 3 195 15 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) -6% 6% 7% -7% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.90 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 Fri: 0.87 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1520 1623 1653 1713 1785 1832 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.80 0.61 1.00 0.57 1.00 Satd. Flow erm 1499 1321 1066 1713 1072 1832 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 10 0 239 3 3 6 80 304 8 3 217 17 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 226 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 23 0 0 6 0 80 312 0 3 233 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 20 4 13 16 14 10 19 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.5 9.0 117.0 117.0 118.0 111.5 Effective Green, g (s) 7.5 8.0 115.0 116.0 116.0 110.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.06 0.82 0.83 0.83 0.79 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 80 75 894 1419 888 1445 v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.18 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm c0.02 0.00 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.08 0.09 0.22 0.00 0.16 Uniform Delay, dl 63.7 62.5 2.3 2.5 2.1 3.6 Progression Factor 1.28 1.00 1.03 1.02 1.12 1.55 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 Delay (s) 82.2 62.7 2.4 2.9 2.3 5.7 Level of Service F E A A A A Approach Delay (s) 82.2 62.7 2.8 5.7 Approach LOS F E A A ln?�jsa,cftn. Sumaty HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 440.0 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific Hwy S & S 316 St 5/5/2016 Moyemak _ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL. NBT NEAR SBU SBL Lane Configurations T* T 11i ttt, !ii Traffic Volume (vph) 73 60 104 126 80 107 76 208 1112 91 42 78 Future Volume (vph) 73 60 104 126 80 107 76 208 1112 91 42 78 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) -2% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.5 6.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1759 1560 1698 1584 1769 4941 1737 Fit Permitted 0.37 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 682 1560 737 1584 1769 4941 1737 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 71 124 140 89 119 86 236 1264 103 45 83 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 48 0 0 38 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 147 0 140 170 0 0 322 1362 0 0 128 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 33 18 16 15 28 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % 1 % 4% 4% 4% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 7 4 4 0 6 4 0 6 7 6 7 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 29.5 24.3 29.5 22.7 32.5 77.4 14.1 Effective Green, g (s) 27.5 23.3 27.5 21.7 32.5 77.4 14.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.17 0.20 0.15 0.23 0.55 0.10 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 178 259 173 245 410 2731 174 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.09 0.02 c0.11 c0.18 0.28 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.13 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.57 0.81 0.69 0.79 0.50 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 47.9 53.7 58.6 56.0 50.5 19.3 61.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.53 1.60 0.81 0.81 0.68 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 1.7 21.4 6.3 7.4 0.5 10.7 Delay (s) 48.7 55.4 111.3 96.2 48.5 16.1 52.2 Level of Service D E F F D B D Approach Delay (s) 53.3 102.2 22.3 Approach LOS D F C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0v/ Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2750: Pacific HwyS & S 316 St 5/512016 Movement SBT SBR LanEMonfigurations ++T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 1397 56 Future Volume (vph) 1397 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 At Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5061 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 5061 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 1486 60 RTOR Reduction (vph) 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1543 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 21 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages #!hr 4 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 59.0 Effective Green, g (s) 59.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2132 v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.72 Uniform Delay, dl 33.7 Progression Factor 0.63 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 Delay (s) 23.1 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 25.3 Approach LOS C Intersection Summa. Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2752: 20 AV S & S 316 St 5/5/2016 S--I. f 4- -*\ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WET WBR NBL NBT NBR SEL SBT SBF Lane Configurations T. I TC- 1� T Traffic Volume (vph) 46 114 65 39 165 100 40 203 45 68 260 3-1 Future Volume (vph) 46 114 65 39 165 100 40 203 45 68 260 K Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190C Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 1 % 1 % 4% -6% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1708 1541 1713 1545 1668 1707 1772 1825 Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.54 1.00 Satd. Flow perm 419 1541 789 1545 829 1707 1004 1825 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80 Adj. Flow (vph) 53 133 76 46 194 118 44 226 50 85 325 41 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 17 0 0 19 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 192 0 46 293 0 44 272 0 85 364 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 20 9 15 11 18 9 17 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #mr) 0 7 0 0 10 0 10 0 7 7 0 10 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 38.0 31.9 38.0 31.4 83.0 76.7 84.0 77.9 Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 30.9 36.0 30.4 81.0 75.7 82.0 76.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.22 0.26 0.22 0.58 0.54 0.59 0.55 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 159 340 236 335 504 922 622 1002 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.12 0.01 c0.19 0.00 0.16 c0.01 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.56 0.19 0.88 0.09 0.29 0.14 0.36 Uniform Delay, d1 41.1 48.6 40.0 53.0 13.2 17.6 12.8 17.8 Progression Factor 1.02 1.02 0.98 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.30 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 1.1 0.1 21.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 1.0 Delay (s) 42.4 50.9 39.5 75.1 13.2 18.4 15.9 24.1 Level of Service D D D E B B B C Approach Delay (s) 49.2 70.5 17.7 22.6 Approach LOS D E B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 ,! Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2754: 23 Av S & S 316 St 5/512o1s Movement EBL EBR SBL SBR NWL NWR Lane Configurations r y it Traffic Volume (vph) 52 135 353 19 182 330 Future Volume (vph) 52 135 353 19 182 330 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 12 11 Grade (%) 0% -7% 4% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.99 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1722 1382 1743 1520 1473 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1812 1382 1743 1600 1473 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 55 142 388 21 190 344 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 121 1 0 0 61 Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 21 408 0 190 283 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 25 22 22 Heavy Vehicles (%) 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 3% Bus Blockages #Ihr 2 2 2 0 0 2 Turn Type custom pm+ov Prot D.P+P Prot Protected Phases 3 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.8 22.3 102.7 110.2 116.2 Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 20.3 101.7 108.2 115.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.15 0.73 0.77 0.82 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 96 259 1266 1232 1212 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.00 c0.23 0.01 c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm c0.00 0.01 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.57 0.08 0.32 0.15 0.23 Uniform Delay, dl 64.5 51.8 6.8 4.1 2.7 Progression Factor 1.25 2.86 0.99 0.61 0.44 Incremental Delay, d2 5.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.4 Delay (s) 85.8 147.9 7.4 2.5 1.6 Level of Service F F A A A Approach Delay (s) 130.6 7.4 1.9 Approach LOS F A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Q. I Actuated Cycle Length (s) fl`/ Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2855: 23 AV S & S 317 St 5/5/2016 3 � � C � � \* A *) '\ ' , � Movement ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWO Lane Configurations *T* ll� tTT- I t ?f Traffic Volume (vph) 10 12 11 311 25 145 120 626 11 16 368 161 Future Volume (vph) 10 12 11 311 25 145 120 626 11 16 368 161 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 11 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 Grade (%) 0% -3% 0% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.95 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 932 1509 1140 1597 3252 1491 1761 1403 Flt Permitted 0.91 0.73 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.34 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 865 1162 1140 669 527 1761 1403 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 _3252 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.88 Adj. Flow (vph) 12 14 13 327 26 153 130 680 12 18 418 183 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 30 0 327 76 0 130 692 0 18 418 92 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 29 47 49 20 76 47 20 Heavy Vehicles (%) 92% 92% 92% 8% 8% 8% 9% 2% 25% 4% 4% 4% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 7 20 20 34 2 7 20 34 34 2 7 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 8 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 46.4 45.9 45.9 80.1 77.7 80.1 70.7 70.7 Effective Green, g (s) 45.4 45.9 45.9 78.1 76.7 79.1 70.2 70.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.56 0.55 0.56 0.50 0.50 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 280 380 373 428 1781 310 883 703 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.02 c0.21 0.00 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.28 0.15 0.03 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.86 0.20 0.30 0.39 0.06 0.47 0.13 Uniform Delay, dl 33.1 44.1 33.9 16.0 18.2 13.8 22.8 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.81 0.71 0.68 0.60 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 17.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.0 1.7 0.4 Delay (s) 33.2 61.2 34.0 12.3 15.4 9.8 17.3 11.5 Level of Service C E C B B A B B Approach Delay (s) 33.2 51.6 14.9 15.4 Approach LOS C D B B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 9.,LA HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.6 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0.0Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3048: 11 PI S & S 320 St 5I5/2016 � � * f- 'I- 4\ t AAbNomorA EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi tT* V, tllA It+ 'I ll' Traffic Volume (vph) 32 1103 210 66 1614 6 410 3 105 39 1 3 Future Volume (vph) 32 1103 210 66 1614 6 410 3 105 39 1 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 2% -1% 2% -3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.75 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.89 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3251 1778 3381 1696 1528 1767 1263 Fit Permitted 0.06 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 118 3251 228 3381 0 1528 0 1263 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 32 1103 210 66 1614 6 410 3 105 39 1 3 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 83 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 32 1304 0 66 1620 0 410 25 0 39 1 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#!hr 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 84.8 79.4 84.8 81.6 35.1 29.7 6.5 1.1 Effective Green, g (s) 84.8 79.4 84.8 81.6 34.6 29.2 5.5 0.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.57 0.61 0.58 0.25 0.21 0.04 0.00 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 108 1843 197 1970 419 318 69 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.40 c0.01 c0.48 c0.24 0.02 c0.02 0.00 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.71 0.34 0.82 0.98 0.08 0.57 no cap Uniform Delay, d1 20.2 21.9 16.1 23.4 52.3 44.6 66.1 Error Progression Factor 0.99 0.68 0.70 1.10 0.98 1.19 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 2.1 0.2 2.2 37.6 0.0 6.2 Error Delay (s) 20.5 17.0 11.4 27.9 88.8 53.2 72.3 Error Level of Service C B B C F D E F Approach Delay (s) 17.0 27.3 81.4 Error Approach LOS B C F F Intersection Summwy HCM 2000 Control Delay ;3. HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio ✓ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific Hwy S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 --. '- f1 4\ t Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR VVBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NSR Lane Configurations M TfT11 Z) W r 1) t+T Traffic Volume (vph) 50 356 839 71 40 447 1418 220 61 227 792 228 Future Volume (vph) 50 356 839 71 40 447 1418 220 61 227 792 228 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -6% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3536 5140 3433 5031 1548 3344 4841 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3536 5140 3433 5031 1548 3344 4841 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 50 356 839 71 40 447 1418 220 61 227 792 228 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 36 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 406 903 0 0 487 1418 141 0 288 984 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 8 0 4 0 4 0 8 0 0 8 0 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA Protected Phases 1 1 6 5 5 2 3 3 8 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 40.6 22.1 43.7 43.7 17.5 42.3 Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 40.6 22.1 43.7 43.7 17.5 42.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.29 0.16 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 467 1490 541 1570 483 418 1462 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.18 0.14 c0.28 c0.09 c0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.61 0.90 0.90 0.29 0.69 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 59.6 42.8 57.9 46.1 36.4 58.6 42.8 Progression Factor 0.75 0.73 1.00 0.99 1.17 0.66 0.87 Incremental Delay, d2 12.8 1.5 14.4 7.1 1.2 2.9 1.9 Delay (s) 57.4 32.7 72.2 52.8 43.8 41.7 39.0 Level of Service E C E D D D D Approach Delay (s) 40.3 56.3 39.6 Approach LOS D E D lntersecflon Summ HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3050: Pacific HwyS & S 320 St 5/5I2016 L* \0 Movement SBU SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations M ttf F Traffic Volume (vph) 53 252 1008 315 Future Volume (vph) 53 252 1008 315 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3440 5136 1510 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3440 5136 1510 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 53 252 1008 315 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 124 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 305 1008 191 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #mr 0 4 0 8 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 39.3 39.3 Effective Green, g (s) 14.5 39.3 39.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension s) 2.0 2.0 2.9 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 356 1441 423 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.70 0.45 Uniform Delay, d1 61.7 45.1 41.5 Progression Factor 0.87 0.46 0.25 Incremental Delay, d2 12.8 2.0 2.4 Delay (s) 66.4 22.9 12.9 Level of Service E C B Approach Delay (s) 29.1 Approach LOS C IrEterse_Efjarr;Surnm Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 AV S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU W8L WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations �) +fT11 M ttT. T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 9 213 974 73 13 57 1699 102 134 83 64 160 Future Volume (vph) 9 213 974 73 13 57 1699 102 134 83 64 160 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 11 11 12 11 11 11 12 11 11 12 11 Grade (%) -3% 2% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3368 4901 3285 4791 1690 1673 1701 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.45 Satd. Flow (perm) 3368 4901 3285 4791 319 1673 813 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 9 213 974 73 13 57 1699 102 134 83 64 160 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 23 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 222 1042 0 0 70 1797 0 134 124 0 160 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.6 84.7 8.4 80.5 28.4 18.9 28.4 Effective Green, g (s) 12.6 84.7 8.4 80.5 27.4 18.4 27.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.61 0.06 0.58 0.20 0.13 0.20 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 303 2965 197 2754 112 219 216 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.21 0.02 c0.38 c0.04 0.07 c0.05 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.35 0.36 0.65 1.20 0.57 0.74 Uniform Delay, dl 62.1 13.9 63.2 20.2 63.7 57.1 56.0 Progression Factor 0.64 1.75 0.70 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 0.2 0.3 1.0 147.2 2.0 11.3 Delay (s) 45.7 24.5 44.8 11.2 210.8 59.1 67.3 Level of Service D C D B F E E Approach Delay (s) 28.2 12.5 131.5 Approach LOS C B F Intersection Summ HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3052: 20 AV S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 i 4/ M6%4 lent 86T_ SOR LaneV,onfig u rations T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 81 206 Future Volume (vph) 81 206 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.89 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1601 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1601 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 206 RTOR Reduction (vph) 71 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 216 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages #/hr) 0 4 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 22.8 Effective Green, g (s) 22.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 _ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 v/s Ratio Prot 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.85 Uniform Delay, dl 57.2 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.4 Delay (s) 78.6 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) 74.6 Approach LOS E Intersection Summa Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement EB1J EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M ttt, $) ttll� + r M T Traffic Volume (vph) 7 137 1040 21 353 1530 166 72 165 284 476 270 Future Volume (vph) 7 137 1040 21 353 1530 166 72 165 284 476 270 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 5% -5% 1 % 0% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 6.0 5.5 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3240 4901 3448 5094 1733 1735 1516 3392 1686 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3240 4901 3448 5094 1733 1735 1516 3392 1686 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ^ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 7 137 1040 21 353 1530 166 72 165 284 476 270 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 63 0 14 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 144 1060 0 353 1688 0 72 165 221 476 391 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 4 16 6 10 10 4 16 4 16 6 6 1_0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot NA _ Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 2 3 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 55.7 17.5 63.6 7.9 25.0 42.5 21.8 38.9 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 55.7 17.5 63.6 7.4 24.5 42.5 21.3 38.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.40 0.12 0.45 0.05 0.18 0.30 0.15 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 222 1949 431 2314 91 303 519 516 462 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.22 c0.10 c0.33 0.04 0.10 0.05 c0.14 c0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.54 0.82 0.73 0.79 0.54 0.43 0.92 0.85 Uniform Delay, dl 63.6 32.4 59.7 31.2 65.5 52.7 39.0 58.5 48.0 Progression Factor 1.38 0.64 1.12 1.23 0.99 1.22 0.76 1.11 1.08 Incremental Delay, d2 4.6 1.0 8.3 1.5 33.9 1.1 0.2 20.3 11.8 Delay (s) 92.0 21.6 75.4 39.9 99.0 65.5 29.7 85.4 63.7 Level of Service F C E D F E C F E Approach Delay (s) 30.0 46.0 50.6 75.4 Approach LOS C D D E Intersection Summ HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) .0 :/ Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3055: 23 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement 93 R Lan4iConfigurations Traffic Vohime (vph) 135 Future Volume (vph) 135 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, pedlbikes Flpb, ped/bikes Fit Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prat) At Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 Adj, Flow (vph) 135 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Confl. Peds. (#Jhr) 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 4 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Acauated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) ' Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/e Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Fedor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 19 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3056: 25 Av S/Gateway Center Blvd S & S 320 St/ S 320 St 5/5/2016 _'A -� ;� r j, t 4� T �► Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations A Tit+ Zi ttT+ T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 9 79 1625 10 3 28 1943 192 25 9 88 133 Future Volume (vph) 9 79 1625 10 3 28 1943 192 25 9 88 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -1 % 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.86 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prat) 1752 4988 1778 5007 1724 1558 1724 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.65 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 4988 1778 5007 1279 1558 1172 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 9 79 1625 10 3 28 1943 192 25 9 88 133 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 78 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 88 1635 0 0 31 2128 0 25 19 0 133 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#ihr) 2 0 6 0 6 0 2 0 2 0_ 6 6 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA D.P+P Protected Phases 5 5 2 1 1 6 7 4 3 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.6 89.2 4.9 81.5 26.4 16.6 26.4 Effective Green, g (s) 12.6 89.2 4.9 81.5 24.4 15.6 24.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.64 0.04 0.58 0.17 0.11 0.17 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 157 3178 62 2914 236 173 238 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.33 0.02 c0.43 0.00 0.01 c0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.06 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.51 0.50 0.73 0.11 0.11 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 61.0 13.7 66.3 21.3 48.7 55.9 54.4 Progression Factor 0.88 0.48 1.07 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.5 2.0 1.4 0.1 0.1 1.6 Delay (s) 55.7 7.1 73.0 14.4 48.7 56.0 56.0 Level of Service E A E B D E E Approach Delay (s) 9.6 15.3 54.6 Approach LOS A B D Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio CZ2V Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 21.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 20 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3056: 25 Av S/Gateway Center Blvd S & S 320 St/ S 320 St 5/5/2016 l 4/ Movement SBT SBR Lanetonfigurations T.), Traffic Volume (vph) 3 77 Future Volume (vph) 3 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.86 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1563 Flt Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1563 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 77 RTOR Reduction (vph) 66 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 14 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 0 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 223 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.06 Uniform Delay, dl 51.9 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 Delay (s) 51.9 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 54.5 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3057: 1-5 SIB Ramp & S 320 St/S 320 St & 1-5 SB Ramp 5/5/2016 __* --► -,* f- '- IL -� r � 1( iNaveirfettt. EBL FBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBR SW1.2 SWL SWR Lane Configurations + t r ftt Zi W Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1493 348 100 1317 0 0 0 522 3 944 Future Volume (vph) 0 1493 348 100 1317 0 0 0 522 3 944 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 0% 2% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util, Factor 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.95 0.95 0.76 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1460 1741 5072 1651 1664 3564 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (2erm) 5046 1460 1741 5072 1651 1664 3564 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1493 348 100 1317 0 0 0 522 3 944 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1493 194 100 1317 0 0 0 261 264 892 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 2 4 4 2 0 2 0 0 2 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA _2 Prot Prot custom Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 45 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 74.8 74.8 19.0 83.8 31.2 31.2 46.2 Effective Green, g (s) 74.8 74.8 19.0 83.8 31.2 31.2 46.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.53 0.14 0.60 0.22 0.22 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot A Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summa 2696 780 236 3035 c0.30 0.06 c0.26 367 370 1176 0.16 0.16 c0.25 0.13 0.55 0.25 0.42 0.43 0.71 0.71 0.76 21.6 17.5 55.5 15.2 50.2 50.3 41.9 0.65 1.09 1.09 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.4 5.3 5.4 2.5 14.8 19.7 60.8 13.3 55.6 55.6 44.4 B B E B E E D 15.7 16.6 0.0 48.4 B B A D HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 f Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: All Traffic Data Services-11/4/04 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3255: 23 Av S & S 322 St 5/5/2016 -A � V 4- � t Movement . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T 1� % t1 tT1 Traffic Volume (vph) 41 1 39 43 12 85 25 389 10 42 463 23 Future Volume (vph) 41 1 39 43 12 85 25 389 10 42 463 23 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -3% 0% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1720 1577 1705 1601 1772 3485 1788 3513 Flt Permitted 0.56 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.51 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1022 1577 1312 1601 869 3485 966 3513 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 41 1 39 43 12 85 25 389 10 42 463 23 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 36 0 0 78 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 4 0 43 19 0 25 398 0 42 485 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #d r 10 0 10 10 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 13.0 19.5 13.2 102.0 97.4 102.0 98.7 Effective Green, g (s) 17.5 12.0 17.5 12.2 101.0 96.9 101.0 98.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.72 0.69 0.72 0.70 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 154 135 179 139 644 2412 720 2464 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.11 c0.00 c0.14 v/s Ratio Perm c0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.03 0.24 0.14 0.04 0.17 0.06 0.20 Uniform Delay, d1 54.9 58.7 55.0 59.1 5.5 7.5 5.6 7.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.07 0.10 0.14 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 55.3 58.7 55.2 59.2 6.1 8.1 0.6 1.2 Level of Service E E E E A A A A Approach Delay (s) 57.0 58.0 8.0 1.1 Approach LOS E E A A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.20 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 21.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 23 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3348: 13 PI S/11 PI S & S 324 St 5/5/2016 t �► 1 Movement VV6L WBR NBT NBR SEL SBT Lane Configurations fi �" Vi t Traffic Volume (vph) 179 200 209 186 142 167 Future Volume (vph) 179 200 209 186 142 167 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% 0% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1567 1863 1583 1787 1881 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.59 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1567 1863 1583 1119 1881 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 179 200 209 186 142 167 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 156 0 54 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 179 44 209 132 142 167 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 81 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.9 30.9 99.1 99.1 111.1 111.1 Effective Green, g (s) 18.9 30.9 99.1 99.1 111.1 111.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.22 0.71 0.71 0.79 0.79 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (sJ_ _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 236 345 1318 1120 921 1492 v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.03 c0.11 c0.01 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.13 0.16 0.12 0.15 0.11 Uniform Delay, dl 58.4 43.7 6.7 6.5 3.4 3.3 Progression Factor 0.92 2.36 1.00 1.00 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 8.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 61.6 103.2 7.0 6.7 0.4 0.5 Level of Service E F A A A A Approach Delay (s) 83.6 6.9 0.4 Approach LOS F A A Intersection Surnm HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.25 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 J Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 24 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 5/5/2016 ---4, --1. -'* it * I /� 1-4 "► Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NST NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations t M T. ' tt% ' Traffic Volume (vph) 85 179 130 431 167 54 167 156 1197 228 50 100 Future Volume (vph) 85 179 130 431 167 54 167 156 1197 228 50 100 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) -1% 1% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 At Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1778 1812 1516 3375 1761 1755 4925 1713 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 1778 1812 1516 3375 1761 1755 4925 1713 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 85 179 130 431 167 54 167 156 1197 228 50 100 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 109 0 9 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 85 179 21 431 212 0 0 323 1408 0 0 150 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#Rrr) 0 8 6 6 2 0 6 2 0 8 0 8 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 i Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 22.6 22.6 19.0 31.1 26.0 62.4 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 22.1 22.1 18.5 30.6 26.0 62.4 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.22 0.19 0.45 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 127 286 239 445 384 325 2195 195 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.10 c0.13 0.12 c0.18 0.29 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.63 0.09 0.97 0.55 0.99 0.64 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 63.4 55.1 50.3 60.5 48.6 56.9 30.1 60.2 Progression Factor 0.96 0.87 1.28 0.74 0.89 1.25 0.85 0.62 Incremental Delay, d2 9.9 3.1 0.1 33.9 1.0 44.8 1.3 10.5 Delay (s) 70.9 51.1 64.7 78.7 44.3 116.0 26.9 47.9 Level of Service E D E E D F C D Approach Delay (s) 59.9 67.0 43.4 Approach LOS E E D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.8-ij/ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 f Sum of lost time (s) 21.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 25 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3350: Pacific Hwy S & S 324 St 5/5/2016 i 4/ Movement S13T SBR LanEMonfigurations W" Traffic Volume (vph) 1369 93 Future Volume (vph) 1369 93 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Flt Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4981 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4981 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1369 93 RTOR Reduction (vph) 5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1457 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages (#mr) 6 2 Turn Type NA _ Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 52.4 Effective Green, g (s) 52.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1864 v/s Ratio Prot c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 Uniform Delay, d1 38.7 Progression Factor 0.40 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 Delay (s) 17.8 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 20.6 Approach LOS C Intersection Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 26 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific HwyS & S 288 St 5/5/2016 --* -';11, 4, *-- it 4\ T L Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NST NBR 5BU SBL Lane Configurations 4�- Fi ttll� M Traffic Volume (vph) 30 30 21 431 24 206 35 16 972 344 6 326 Future Volume (vph) 30 30 21 431 24 206 35 16 972 344 6 326 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 Grade (%) 14% -7% -2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.0 Lane Ubl. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1768 1711 1729 1585 1787 4832 3318 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd Flow (perm) 1768 1711 1729 1585 1787 4832 3318 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 _ 0.88 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 34 34 24 468 26 224 39 18 1080 382 6 343 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 182 0 0 34 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 0 248 246 42 0 57 1428 0 0 349 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 27 14 22 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages #Ihr 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 7 8 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.4 26.0 26.0 26.0 7.2 58.9 10.7 Effective Green, g (s) 21.4 26.0 26.0 26.0 7.7 59.4 11.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.42 0.08 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 270 317 321 294 98 2050 265 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 c0.14 0.14 0.03 0.30 c0.11 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.78 0.77 0.14 0.58 0.70 1.32 Uniform Delay, dl 53.0 54.3 54.1 47.7 64.6 32.9 64.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.89 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 11.0 9.5 0.1 5.3 1.9 166.8 Delay (s) 53.3 65.3 63.6 47.7 61.3 31.1 231.8 Level of Service D E E D E C F Approach Delay (s) 53.3 59.2 32.3 Approach LOS D E C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0 85 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1050: Pacific Hwx S & S 288 St _ 5/5/2016 4/ Movement S8T SBR Lar onfigurations tti) Traffic Volume (vph) 1897 66 Future Volume (vph) 1897 66 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4984 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 4984 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 1997 69 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 2064 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19 Heavy Vehicle's (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages#1hr) 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 62.4 Effective Green, g (s) 62.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2239 v/s Ratio Prot c0.41 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 36.2 Progression Factor 1.01 Incremental Delay, d2 7.8 Delay (s) 44.5 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 71.5 Approach LOS E Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1651: Pacific Hwy S & S Dash Point Rd 5/5/2016 fl 4\ t L l -' Movement EBL EBR NBU NBL NBT SBU SBT SBR Lane Configurations i h ttt A TT? r Traffic Volume (vph) 369 124 52 184 1002 43 1520 872 Future Volume (vph) 369 124 52 184 1002 43 1520 872 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3311 1482 1787 5095 1753 5099 1581 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3311 1482 1787 5095 416 5099 1581 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 410 138 55 196 1066 46 1617 928 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 65 Lane Group Flow (vph) 410 30 0 251 1066 46 1617 863 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Bus Blockages #/hr) 6 9 9 0 6 6 9 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Prot NA D.P+P NA pm+ov Protected Phases 4 5 5 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 30.8 30.8 22.8 86.1 93.7 70.9 101.7 Effective Green, g (s) 30.8 30.8 22.8 86.6 93.7 71.4 101.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.16 0.62 0.67 0.51 0.73 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 728 326 291 3151 351 2600 1148 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.14 0.21 0.01 0.32 c0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.08 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.09 0.86 0.34 0.13 0.62 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 48.6 43.5 57.1 12.9 12.7 24.6 11.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.57 2.02 1.49 2.63 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 20.6 0.3 0.0 0.6 1.4 Delay (s) 49.2 43.5 72.8 7.6 25.7 37.4 31.8 Level of Service D D E A C D C Approach Delay (s) 47.8 20.0 35.2 Approach LOS D B D Intersection Surnmary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) J Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2051: Pacific Hwy S & S 304 St 5/5/2016 --I' --I. --t f- .0--- ',- fl 4\ r L! 1'1'� Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations + r *4 n ttT,. Traffic Volume (vph) 35 43 54 124 53 70 84 55 1095 123 5 69 Future Volume (vph) 35 43 54 124 53 70 84 55 1095 123 5 69 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 11 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 5% -1 % Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.96 1.00 0.98 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1795 1471 1654 1778 4976 1752 At Permitted 0.74 1.00 0.75 0.95 1.00 0.18 Satd. Flow(perm) 1352 1471 1269 1778 4976 333 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 51 63 79 135 58 76 86 56 1117 126 5 75 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 62 0 12 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 114 17 0 257 0 0 142 1235 0 0 80 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 6 8 3 3 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Bus Blockages #/hr 6 0 9 9 0 6 9 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P D.P+P Protected Phases 4 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.0 32.0 32.0 19.5 85.4 92.0 Effective Green, g (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 19.5 85.4 92.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.61 0.66 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 _ 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 299 325 280 247 3035 285 v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.25 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.01 c0.20 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.05 0.92 0.57 0.41 0.28 Uniform Delay, dl 46.3 42.9 53.3 56.4 14.2 9.A Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.85 0.72 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 32.4 1.9 0.4 0.2 Delay (s) 46.6 43.0 85.6 48.0 12.4 619 Level of Service D D F D B A Approach Delay (s) 45.1 85.6 16.1 Approach LOS D F B Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio v. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 40.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2051: Pacific Hwy S & S 304 St 5/5/2016 4/ Movement SBT 5BR LanEMonfigurations ++T+ Traffic Volume (vph) 1402 58 Future Volume (vph) 1402 58 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4931 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 4931 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1524 63 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1585 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 9 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 72.5 Effective Green, g (s) 72.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 _ Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2553 v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.62 Uniform Delay, dl 24.0 Progression Factor 0.57 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 Delay (s) 14.6 Level of Service B Approach Delay (s) 14.3 Approach LOS B Enterseeltars.Surr�m...Aw- Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2057: 28 AV S & S 304 St 5/5/2016 __11- -t {1 I} Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ 4 r Traffic Volume (vph) 171 65 436 249 84 385 Future Volume (vph) 171 65 436 249 84 385 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 11 12 12 11 11 12 Grade (%) 6% -2% 4% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1660 1789 1837 1693 1550 Fit Permitted 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1660 866 1837 1693 1550 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 184 70 469 268 91 418 RTOR Reduction (vph) 10 0 0 0 0 179 Lane Group Flow (vph) 245 0 469 268 91 239 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 1 2 1 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 1 % 1 % 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 1 2 2 0 0 1 Turn Type NA D.P+P NA Prot pm+ov Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 3 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 45.0 103.0 108.0 22.0 80.0 Effective Green, g (s) 45.0 103.0 108.0 22.0 80.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.74 0.77 0.16 0.57 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 533 1019 1417 266 _ 941 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.19 0.15 c0.05 0.11 v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.19 0.34 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 37.8 7.3 4.3 52.6 15.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.1 0.3 3.5 0.6 Delay (s) 38.0 7.4 4.6 56.0 15.7 Level of Service D A A E B Approach Delay (s) 38.0 6.4 22.9 Approach LOS D A C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.44 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2250: Pacific Hwy S & S 308 St 5/5/2016 __,I' __* ---t 4- '- '1_ C 4% t /P. L* Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations 4 4* i ttT. Traffic Volume (vph) 75 19 32 28 19 71 108 48 1108 26 50 62 Future Volume (vph) 75 19 32 28 19 71 108 48 1108 26 50 62 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 14 12 12 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 2% 1 % Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1810 1801 1761 5002 1796 At Permitted 0.60 0.87 0.95 1.00 0.20 Satd Flow (perm) 1114 1591 1761 5002 387 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 092 Adj. Flow (vph) 107 27 46 34 23 86 114 51 1166 27 54 67 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 45 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 170 0 0 98 0 0 165 1192 0 0 121 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 13 13 2 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages {#N 6 0 11 11 0 6 11 0 6 0 6 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot Prot NA D.P+P D.P+P Protected Phases 4 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 20.7 20.7 20.5 97.8 103.8 Effective Green, g (s) 19.7 19.7 20.5 97.8 103.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.70 0.74 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 156 223 257 3494 347 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.24 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm c0.15 0.06 0.24 vlc Ratio 1.09 0.44 0.64 0.34 0.35 Uniform Delay, dl 60.1 55.1 56.3 8.3 10.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.37 0.33 Incremental Delay, d2 97.4 0.5 3.3 0.2 0.2 Delay (s) 157.6 55.6 52.4 3.3 3.5 Level of Service F E D A A Approach Delay (s) 157.6 55.6 9.3 Approach LOS F E A Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.06 / Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 •/ Sum of lost time (s) 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2250: Pacific Hwy S & S 308 St 5/5/2016 Movement SET SBR — .... Lan&onfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) 1460 92 Future Volume (vph) 1460 92 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 12 Grade (%) -1 % Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Fri: 0.99 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5040 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 5040 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1587 100 RTOR Reduction (vph) 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1683 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Heavy Vehicles (%) 1 % 1 % Bus Blockages (#/hr) 11 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 83.3 Effective Green, g (s) 83.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2998 v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 17.2 Progression Factor 0.23 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 Delay (s) 4.5 Level of Service A Approach Delay (s) 4.5 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3040: 1 AV S & SW 320 St/S 320 St 5/512016 � -. � f- � � -N moyp"xint-.: - EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT 5BR Lane Configurations tt r tt r tt is tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 779 355 0 1405 360 0 510 414 0 642 287 Future Volume (vph) 0 779 355 0 1405 360 0 510 414 0 642 287 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -1% -1% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3557 1513 3557 1527 3522 1575 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 1583 3557 1513 3557 1527 3522 1575 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 779 355 0 1405 360 0 510 414 0 642 287 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 8 0 0 100 0 0 188 0 0 217 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 779 347 0 1405 260 0 510 226 0 642 70 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #(hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm NA NA Perm Protected Phases 2f 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 99.6 99.6 89.4 89.4 30.4 35.6 30.9 30.9 Effective Green, g (s) 99.6 99.6 89.4 89.4 30.4 35.6 30.9 30.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.64 0.64 0.22 0.25 0.22 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2517 1126 2271 966 772 442 777 347 v/s Ratio Prot 0.22 c0.40 0.14 c0.02 c0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.17 0.13 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.31 0.31 0.62 0.27 0.66 0.51 0.83 0.20 Uniform Delay, d1 7.5 7.5 15.1 11.0 50.1 44.7 52.0 44.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.7 1.3 0.7 1.7 0.4 6.8 0.1 Delay (s) 7.8 8.2 16.4 11.7 51.7 45.2 58.8 44.6 Level of Service A A B B D D E D Approach Delay (s) 7.9 15.4 48.8 54.4 Approach LOS A B D D Intersection $ummary HCM 2000 Control Delay e A .C] HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 / 6Sk Actuated Cycle Length (s) D v of lost time (s) 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: ! Phase conflict between lane groups. c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3046: 8 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL. WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations °i tT+ t'+ 4 44 Traffic Volume (vph) 27 1139 6 33 1732 116 5 9 23 107 16 27 Future Volume (vph) 27 1139 6 33 1732 116 5 9 23 107 16 27 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 4% 4% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.92 0.98 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.97 Satd. Flow (prat) 1734 3322 1803 3389 1640 1736 Fit Permitted 0.08 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.97 0.81 Satd. Flow (perm) 144 3322 410 3389 1602 1448 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 27 1139 6 33 1732 116 5 9 23 107 16 27 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 20 0 0 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 1145 0 33 1845 0 0 17 0 0 144 0 Confl. Peds. (#mr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 4 0 0 8 0 8 0 4 4 0 8 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 107.8 102.8 107.8 104.7 18.2 18.2 Effective Green, g (s) 107.8 101.8 107.8 104.7 17.2 18.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.73 0.77 0.75 0.12 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 146 2415 365 2534 196 188 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.34 0.00 c0.54 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.07 0.01 c0.10 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.47 0.09 0.73 0.09 0.77 Uniform Delay, dl 9.2 8.0 7.9 9.8 54.4 58.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.53 0.45 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 15.3 Delay (s) 9.4 8.6 4.2 4.9 54.5 74.1 Level of Service A A A A D E Approach Delay (s) 8.6 4.9 54.5 74.1 Approach LOS A A D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.6% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group l HCM 2000 Level of Service B JSum of lost time (s) 16.0 ICU Level of Service D Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3058: 1-5 NB - 320/320 EB - 1-5 NB Ramps & S 320 St & 1-5 NB Ram 5/5/2016 __,# -;t X-- .4- 4-_ \4.. f MWetnent EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR SBL SBR NEL2 NEL NE;R Lane Configurations ttt r ttf r Zli r Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1365 621 0 961 222 0 0 398 0 350 Future Volume (vph) 0 1365 621 0 961 222 0 0 398 0 350 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % -1 % 3% 2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5046 1536 5097 1460 1651 1664 1503 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 5046 1536 5097 1460 1651 1664 1503 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1365 621 0 961 222 0 0 398 0 350 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 0 0 0 16 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1365 621 0 961 159 0 0 199 199 334 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages *r 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 Turn Type NA Free NA Perm Prot Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free 6 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 92.7 140.0 92.7 92.7 37.3 37.3 37.3 Effective Green, g (s) 92.7 140.0 92.7 91.7 37.3 37.3 36.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 1.00 0.66 0.66 0.27 0.27 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3341 1536 3374 956 439 443 389 v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 0.19 0.12 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.11 c0.22 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.40 0.28 0.17 0.45 0.45 0.86 Uniform Delay, dl 11.0 0.0 9.8 9.3 42.8 42.8 49.4 Progression Factor 0.23 1.00 0.72 0.35 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 16.4 Delay (s) 2.8 0.7 7.3 3.6 43.1 43.1 65.9 Level of Service A A A A D D E Approach Delay (s) 2.1 6.6 0.0 53.+ Approach LOS A A A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0 6 HCM 2000 Level of Service B Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.2% ICU Level of Service 2- Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 11 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3060: 32 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 --I' --v 4- .0--- 1- .4\ Movement ESL EBT EBR WBL WST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r tT4 41� Traffic Volume (vph) 1 1649 28 12 1067 1 109 50 0 1 0 1 Future Volume (vph) 1 1649 28 12 1067 1 109 50 0 1 0 1 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% 0% -3% 0% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1769 3525 1513 1770 3524 1782 1891 1404 At Permitted 0.24 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (perm)_ 448 3525 1513 202 3524 1782 1891 1404 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1 1649 28 12 1067 1 109 50 0 1 0 1 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 1649 21 12 1068 0 109 50 0 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #Ihr 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 Turn Type- D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 6 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 106.3 104.3 104.3 106.3 105.3 14.2 14.2 1.0 Effective Green, g (s) 106.3 104.3 104.3 106.3 105.3 14.2 14.2 0.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.75 0.10 0.10 0.00 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 349 2626 1127 175 2650 180 191 0 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.47 c0.00 0.30 c0.06 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.00 0.63 0.02 0.07 0.40 0.61 0.26 0.00 Uniform Delay, dl 4.5 8.6 4.6 7.1 6.2 60.2 58.1 70.0 Progression Factor 0.48 0.34 1.00 0.86 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 3.9 0.3 0.0 Delay (s) 2.2 3.9 4.6 6.1 5.3 64.1 58.3 70.0 Level of Service A A A A A E E E Approach Delay (s) 3.9 5.3 62.3 70.0 Approach LOS A A E E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio PO/ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0Sum of lost time (s) 19.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 12 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3061: Weyerhaeuser Wy S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBT EBR VVBL VVBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tt r Rt W r Traffic Volume (vph) 1616 95 174 1085 150 246 Future Volume (vph) 1616 95 174 1085 150 246 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3525 1514 1770 3525 3200 1390 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3525 1514 1770 3525 3200 1390 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1616 95 174 1085 150 246 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 24 0 0 107 111 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1616 71 174 1085 164 14 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr 2 0 0 2 2 2 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 93.0 93.0 17.3 115.3 15.7 15.7 Effective Green, g (s) 93.0 93.0 17.3 115.3 15.7 15.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.12 0.82 0.11 0.11 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2341 1005 218 2903 358 155 v/s Ratio Prot c0.46 c0.10 0.31 c0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.07 0.80 0.37 0.46 0.09 Uniform Delay, d1 14.6 8.3 59.7 3.1 58.2 55.7 Progression Factor 0.30 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.4 0.1 17.0 0.4 0.3 0.1 Delay (s) 5.7 1.5 76.7 3.5 58.5 55.8 Level of Service A A E A E E Approach Delay (s) 5.5 13.6 57.7 Approach LOS A B E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s)C-VSum of lost time (s) 14.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 13 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3650: Pacific Hwy S & S 330 St 5/5/2016 ♦ Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL 1NBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBta 99L Lane Configurations Ti I T+ t ++T :i Traffic Volume (vph) 48 18 80 38 16 24 45 55 1473 46 172 34 Future Volume (vph) 48 18 80 38 16 24 45 55 1473 46 172 34 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 4% 0% 2% Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1745 1633 1715 1669 1752 4963 1787 Fit Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1343 1633 1148 1669 1752 4963 1787 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 48 18 80 38 16 24 45 55 1473 46 172 34 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 72 0 0 22 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 48 26 0 38 18 0 0 100 1517 0 0 206 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Bus Blockages(#/hr) 10 6 0 10 10 6 6 0 10 10 6 6 10 0 6 10 10 10 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.5 15.7 20.0 15.5 14.0 79.8 19.7 Effective Green, g (s) 17.5 14.7 18.0 14.5 14.0 79.8 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.57 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 176 171 160 172 175 2828 251 vls Ratio Prot c0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.06 c0.31 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm c0.03 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.27 0.15 0.24 0.11 0.57 0.54 0.82 Uniform Delay, d1 55.6 57.0 55.9 56.9 60.1 18.6 58.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.44 0.64 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 2.1 0.5 11.6 Delay (s) 55.9 57.1 56.2 57.0 45.4 8.7 48.8 Level of Service E E E E D A D Approach Delay (s) 56.7 56.6 11.0 Approach LOS E E B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 23.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 14 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3650: Pacific Hwy S & S 330 St 5/5/2016 4/ Movement SBT SBR LanEMonfgurations pia Traffic Volume (vph) 1859 55 Future Volume (vph) 1859 55 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Frt 1.00 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5064 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (uerm) 5064 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1859 55 RTOR Reduction (vph) 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1912 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages (#Ihr) 6 0 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 85.5 Effective Green, g (s) 85.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3092 v/s Ratio Prot c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.62 Uniform Delay, dl 17.0 Progression Factor 1.45 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 Delay (s) 25.3 Level of Service C Approach Delay (s) 27.6 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 15 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 5/5/2016 .,* ,(-- '+-- 4, C 4,, t /0� I! \S. Movement EBL EBT EBR. WBL WBT WBR NBU° NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Lane Configurations + r I tt N) ttll� Traffic Volume (vph) 409 375 421 184 403 116 14 290 1100 86 27 84 Future Volume (vph) 409 375 421 184 403 116 14 290 1100 86 27 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% 1% 3% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (prot) 1717 1853 1516 1731 3373 3368 4897 1796 Fit Permitted 0.25 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 446 1853 1516 388 3373 3368 4897 1796 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 409 375 421 184 403 116 14 290 1100 86 27 84 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 117 0 21 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 409 375 304 184 498 0 0 304 1180 0 0 111 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 6 0 4 4 2 �NA 6 4 2 6 0 6 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P Prot Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 1 1 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 48.9 36.1 36.1 48.9 30.4 13.0 58.1 12.5 Effective Green, g (s) 48.9 36.1 36.1 48.9 30.4 13.0 58.1 12.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.26 0.26 0.35 0.22 0.09 0.42 0.09 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.0 ' 5.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 323 477 390 258 732 312 2032 160 v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 0.20 0.07 0.15 c0.09 0.24 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.27 0.20 0.18 v/c Ratio 1.27 0.79 0.78 0.71 0.68 0.97 0.58 0.69 Uniform Delay, d1 39.7 48.4 48.2 35.3 50.3 63.3 31.6 61.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.93 0.76 Incremental Delay, d2 142.2 7.7 8.7 7.5 2.1 38.9 1.0 8.7 Delay (s) 181.9 56.1 56.9 42.8 52.4 100.0 30.3 55.8 Level of Service F E E D D F C E Approach Delay (s) 99.1 49.9 44.5 Approach LOS F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D _ HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 20.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 16 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4050: Pacific Hwy S & S 336 St 5/5/2016 4/ Mavement SBT SBR LanEMonfgurations "t fir Traffic Volume (vph) 1556 352 Future Volume (vph) 1556 352 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -3% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 5134 1556 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 5134 1556 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 1556 352 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1556 290 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 Bus Blockages #/hr) 4 2 Turn Type NA pm+ov Protected Phases 6 7 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 57.6 76.1 Effective Green, g (s) 57.6 76.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.54 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2112 845 v/s Ratio Prot c0.30 0.05 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 34.8 17.9 Progression Factor 0.70 0.48 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 0.1 Delay (s) 26.5 8.7 Level of Service C A Approach Delay (s) 25.0 Approach LOS C Intersection~Summ Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 17 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4250: Pacific Hwy S & S 340 PI/16 Av S 5/5/2016 t L* i Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT. Lane Configurations T+ t rr Di tt'r+ M ttl Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 26 43 86 1356 82 606 26 6 1124 1231 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 26 43 86 1356 82 606 26 6 1124 1231 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -5% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 1799 1909 2752 1752 4972 3407 5121 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.40 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 583 1799 1909 2752 265 4972 1438 5121 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 26 43 86 1356 82 606 26 6 1124 1231 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 0 170 0 4 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3 0 43 86 1186 82 628 0 0 130 1233 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 0 10 Bus Blockages #!hr 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 4 2 2 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov D.P+P N custom Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5! 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 5! Actuated Green, G (s) 14.2 35.5 54.7 94.4 9.8 30.1 39.7 62.0 Effective Green, g (s) 14.2 35.5 4.7 9 69.8 30.1 39.7 62.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.25 0. 9 .66 0.50 0.22 0.28 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension a 2.0 2.0 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)/56.6 745 44 214 1068 407 2267 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0. 7 0.02 c0.13 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm0.2 0.17 c0.79 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.61 0.38 0.59 2.78 0.54 Uniform Delay, dl 27.2 13.5 20.4 49.4 50.1 28.6 Progression Factor 0.75 0.56 .00 1.00 0.59 0.38 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.4 .4 0.5 804.5 0.7 Delay (s) 20.5 7.9 20. 49.9 833.9 11.5 Level of Service C A D F B Approach Delay (s) 9.5 46.6 404.8 Approach LOS A D F Intersection HCM 2000 Control Delay 2 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.37 0 ---Q Actuated Cycle Length (s) 1 m of lost time (s) 21.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 0.7% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 18 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4250: Pacific Hwy S & S 340 PI/16 Av S 5/6/2016 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T. + rr D ++13 )) W. Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 26 43 86 1356 82 606 26 1130 1231 2 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 26 43 86 1356 82 606 26 1130 1231 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 0% -5% 2% -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 0.97 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1583 1799 1909 2752 1752 4972 3454 5121 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1583 1799 1909 2752 265 4972 3454 5121 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 26 43 86 1356 82 606 26 1130 1231 2 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 23 0 0 0 170 0 4 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3 0 43 86 1186 82 628 0 1130 1233 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #/hr 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 4 2 2 2 0 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pm+ov D.P+P NA Prot NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.2 35.5 54.7 94.4 69.8 30.1 39.7 62.0 Effective Green, g (s) 14.2 35.5 54.7 92.4 69.8 30.1 39.7 62.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.25 0.39 0.66 0.50 022 0.28 0.44 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.0 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 160 456 745 1944 214 1068 979 2267 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.02 0.05 c0.17 0.02 c0.13 c0.33 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.26 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.09 0.12 0.61 0.38 0.59 1.15 0.54 Uniform Delay, dl 56.6 40.0 27.2 13.5 20.4 49.4 50.1 28.6 Progression Factor 1.00 0.90 0.75 0.56 1.00 1.00 0.54 038 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.5 78.5 0.7 Delay (s) 56.6 35.8 205 7.9 20.8 49.9 105.7 11.5 Level of Service E D C A C D F B Approach Delay (s) 56.6 9.5 46.6 56.5 Approach LOS E A D E Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) ,/ Sum of lost time (s) 21.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4250: Pacific Hwy S & S 340 PI/16 Ay S 5/5/2016 4/ Movement SBR LtWonfigu rations Traffic Volume (vph) 2 Future Volume (vph) 2 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Grade (%) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frpb, oed+bikes Flpb, ped/bikes Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) At Permitted Sald. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 2 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Conti. Peds. (0r) Bus Blockages #/hr 0 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s'Ralio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection. Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 19 0 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4550: 16 Av S & S 344 St 5/5/2016 ---* --I. -,* 4- 4\ IGbyetibot EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 11� 11� I ?1+ I tT Traffic Volume (vph) 6 36 72 134 34 90 65 899 47 139 954 19 Future Volume (vph) 6 36 72 134 34 90 65 899 47 139 954 19 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -5% 3% -1% Total Lost time (s) 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1724 1630 1787 1665 1743 3437 1777 3528 Flt Permitted 0.60 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.24 1.00 0.23 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1088 1630 1074 1665 432 3437 435 3528 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 6 36 72 134 34 90 65 899 47 139 954 19 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 57 0 0 69 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 6 51 0 134 55 0 65 944 0 139 972 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#/hr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 32.2 19.0 32.2 31.1 88.8 80.0 88.8 84.7 Effective Green, g (s) 32.2 19.0 32.2 31.1 88.8 80.0 88.8 84.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.14 0.23 0.22 0.63 0.57 0.63 0.61 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extensions 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 221 314 369 312 1964 360 2134 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.03 c0.04 0.03 0.01 c0.27 c0.02 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.06 0.13 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.23 0.43 0.15 0.21 0.48 0.39 0.46 Uniform Delay, dl 41.7 54.0 44.9 43.8 18.9 17.7 23.0 15.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.08 1.60 0.73 1.37 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 41.7 54.2 45.2 43.9 39.3 28.9 16.8 20.7 Level of Service D D D D D C B C Approach Delay (s) 53.5 44.6 29.6 20.2 Approach LOS D D C C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 2n.n. HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 20 in HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkwy S/16 AV S & S 348 St/SR 18 5/5/2016 ---* --* � 'r .0--- *- fl -� Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NSL NBT NV SBL Lane Configurations ttt r M) +++ r M tT+ Traffic Volume (vph) 4 109 1192 333 985 1543 459 162 303 594 527 520 Future Volume (vph) 4 109 1192 333 985 1543 459 162 303 594 527 520 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 2% -4% 2% Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1738 5034 1519 5077 5173 1559 3385 3206 1408 3467 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1738 5034 1519 5077 5173 1559 3385 3206 1408 3467 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 4 109 1192 333 985 1543 459 162 303 594 527 520 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 100 0 0 227 0 0 19 51 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 113 1192 233 985 1543 232 0 465 759 292 520 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #Ihr 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot Prot NA pm+ov Prot Protected Phases 7 7 4 3 8 5 5 2 3 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 11.5 37.5 37.5 28.0 54.0 54.0 21.7 33.0 61.0 22.0 Effective Green, g (s) 11.5 37.5 37.5 28.0 54.0 54.0 21.7 33.0 61.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.20 0.39 0.39 0.15 0.24 0.44 0.16 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 142 1348 406 1015 1995 601 524 755 663 544 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.24 c0.19 0.30 0.14 c0.24 0.09 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.15 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.88 0.57 0.97 0.77 0.39 0.89 1.01 0.44 0.96 Uniform Delay, dl 63.1 49.2 44.4 55.6 37.6 31.0 58.0 53.5 27.6 58.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.81 0.51 0.83 Incremental Delay, d2 24.2 8.7 5.8 21.2 3.0 1.9 15.1 32.7 0.2 26.7 Delay (s) 87.3 57.9 50.2 76.8 40.6 32.9 62.7 76.2 14.2 75.2 Level of Service F E D E D C E E B E Approach Delay (s) 58.4 51.4 58.8 Approach LOS E D E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 5 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.9 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 0.0 Sum of lost time (s) 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 21 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4850: Enchanted Pkwy S/16 Av S & S 348 St/SR 18 5/5/2016 Movement SBT SBR LaVConfigurafons tt1a Traffic Volume (vph) 777 150 Future Volume (vph) 777 150 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Grade (%) -2% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 Frt 0.98 Fit Protected 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 4981 Fit Permitted 1.00 Satd. Flow (aerm) 4981 Peak -hour factor. PHF 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 777 150 RTOR Reduction (vph) 20 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 907 0 Confl. Peds. (#Ihr) 10 Bus Blockages (#fhr) 2 _ 2 Turn Type NA Protected Phases 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 32.8 Effective Green, g (s) 32.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 Vehicle E)dension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1166 v/s Ratio Prot 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 Uniform Delay, dl 50.2 Progression Factor 0.80 Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 Delay (s) 43.2 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) 54.7 Approach LOS D Intersection Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 22 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5050: Enchanted Pkwy S & S 352 St 5/5/2016 AilMMW EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) T if ti. tt Traffic Volume (vph) 26 6 30 253 8 313 7 896 218 205 1412 40 Future Volume (vph) 26 6 30 253 8 313 7 896 218 205 1412 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1% -11% 0% 1% Total Lost time (s) 5.5 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 At Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1730 1588 1835 1965 1636 1770 3391 1760 3507 1497 Flt Permitted 0.75 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.19 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1370 1588 1417 1965 1636 254 3391 344 3507 1497 Peak -hour factor, PH 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 26 6 30 253 8 313 7 896 218 205 1412 40 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 27 0 0 0 266 0 11 0 0 0 13 Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 9 0 253 8 47 7 1103 0 205 1412 27 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages #fir 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA pm+ov D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 4 4 3 3 1 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 3 4 3 6 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.4 15.1 24.4 9.3 22.8 96.1 82.6 96.1 95.1 95.1 Effective Green, g (s) 22.4 14.1 22.4 8.3 20.8 96.1 82.6 96.1 95.1 95.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.10 0.16 0.06 0.15 0.69 0.59 0.69 0.68 0.68 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 255 159 251 116 313 185 2000 372 2382 1016 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 c0.06 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.33 c0.05 c0.40 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.10 0.02 0.03 0.33 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.06 1.01 0.07 0.15 0.04 0.55 0.55 0.59 0.03 Uniform Delay, dl 50.1 56.9 56.9 62.2 51.9 9.5 17.4 11.0 12.1 7.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.62 0.82 1.76 0.62 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 58.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 Delay (s) 50.2 57.0 115.8 62.3 52.0 5.9 15.4 19.9 8.1 7.4 Level of Service D E F E D A B B A A Approach Delay (s) 54.1 80.2 15.4 9.5 Approach LOS D F B A Intersedon uurrtma HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 ./ Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 22.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Description: c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 23 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5251: Enchanted Pkwy S & S 356 St 5/5/2016 _--* __O� 4- t �► 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SM Lane Configurations *T if l t4 tt Traffic Volume (vph) 225 10 278 30 72 6 422 1057 53 9 1244 6 Future Volume (vph) 225 10 278 30 72 6 422 1057 53 9 1244 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Grade (%) 1 % 0% -1 % 1 % Total Lost time (s) 3.5 3.5 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1746 1525 1743 1837 3450 3509 1761 3504 At Permitted 0.61 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow(perm) 1116 1525 641 1837 3450 3509 1761 3504 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 225 10 278 30 72 6 422 1057 53 9 1244 6 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 220 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 235 58 30 76 0 422 1109 0 9 1250 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Bus Blockages (#mr) 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 28.1 28.1 28.6 28.6 19.0 95.4 2.0 78.4 Effective Green, g (s) 29.1 29.1 30.6 30.6 21.0 96.4 2.0 80.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.15 0.69 0.01 0.57 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 231 316 140 401 517 2416 25 2012 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.12 0.32 0.01 c0.36 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.04 0.05 v/c Ratio 1.02 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.82 0.46 0.36 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 55.5 45.7 44.8 44.6 57.6 9.9 68.4 19.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 63.7 0.1 0.3 0.1 9.2 0.6 3.2 1.5 Delay (s) 119.2 45.8 45.1 44.7 66.8 10.6 71.6 21.2 Level of Service F D D D E B E C Approach Delay (s) 79.4 44.8 26.0 21.5 Approach LOS E D C C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) Sum of lost time (s) 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 24 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 451: Pacific Hwy S & 16 Av S 5/5/2016 Movement NBU NBL NBT SBT SBR SEL SER Lane Configurations n TTT tt1+ r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 84 161 1071 1976 13 0 312 Future Volume (Veh/h) 84 161 1071 1976 13 0 312 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade -3% 2% 4% A D Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 0.84 0.84-L.L►�.v+��1 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 168 1116 2148 14 0 371 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 989 pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 0 2172 2883 743 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 0 2172 2883 743 tC, single (s) 0.0 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 0.0 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 0 30 100 0 cM capacity (veh/h) 0 240 4 351 Direction, Lane # NB 1 N8 2 NB 3 NS 4 SB 1 S8 2 SB 3 SE 1 Volume Total 168 372 372 372 859 859 444 371 Volume Left 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 371 cSH 240 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 351 Volume to Capacity 0.70 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.51 0.51 0.26 � V d Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 327 Control Delay (s) 48.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.7 Lane LOS E F Approach Delay (s) 6.4 0.0 98.7 Approach LOS F Intersection Surnma Average Delay 11.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 750: Pacific Hwy S & S 283 PI 5/5/2016 4- '1- T r' L* � Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU 5BL SBT Lane Configurations N +tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 46 1238 17 7 92 2249 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 46 1238 17 7 92 2249 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade -11% -3% 3% Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.98 R98 0.98 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 56 1346 18 0 94 2295 Pedestrians 8 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 2326 476 0 1372 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2326 476 0 1372 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 0.0 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 0.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 90 0 81 cM capacity (veh/h) 26 534 0 493 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 56 538 538 287 94 765 765 765 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 94 0 0 0 Volume Right 56 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 cSH 534 1700 1700 1700 493 1 D Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.17 0.19 n 0.45 0.45 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 0 17 0 0 Control Delay (s) 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 12.5 0.0 0.6 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1751: Pacific Hwy S & 18 AV S 5/5/2016 4 L4 �► l movenojt WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Tt1a h tt Traffic Volume (vehm) `1- 64 1198 58 3 24 1685 Future Volume (Veh/h) 1 54 1198 58 3 24 1685 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade -10% -4% 3% Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 74 1235 60 0 26 1832 Pedestrians 2 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 10.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 720 pX, platoon unblocked 0.77 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 1940 454 0 1297 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1188 454 0 1297 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 0.0 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 0.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 87 0 95 cM capacity (veh/h) 135 554 0 535 Direction, Lane # Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB i SS 2 SB 3 SB 4 75 494 494 307 1 0 0 0 74 0 0 60 532 1700 1700 1700 0.14 0.29 0.29 0.18 12 0 0 0 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 B 12.9 0.0 B 0.4 Err% 15 26 611 611 611 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 535 0 0.05 0.36 0.3 0.3 4 0 0 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 B 0.2 ICU Level of Service Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2350: Pacific Hwy S & S 310 St 5/5/2016 f T r' �► Movement WSL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r ttT# ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 50 1125 55 1 1693 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 50 1125 55 1 1693 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 1% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.94 0.94 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 64 1197 59 1 1881 Pedestrians 16 16 12 Lane Width (ft) 10.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 660 662 pX, platoon unblocked 0.88 0.84 0.84 vC, conflicting volume 1888 456 1272 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 335 0 679 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 93 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 548 902 759 Direction, Lane # W8 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 S81 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 64 479 479 298 377 752 752 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Right 64 0 0 59 0 0 0 cSH 902 1700 1700 1700 759 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.00 (,, 0.4 0.44 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A A Approach Delay (s) 9.3 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary _ Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2551: 18 Av S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 --* --0- --t 4- *.-- 'I- 4\ t /P� \*. Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tT tT, *T r 4� Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 452 95 9 565 50 68 12 12 29 16 49 Future Volume (Veh/h) 30 452 95 9 565 50 68 12 12 29 16 49 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 5% -5% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.80 Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 476 100 9 577 51 88 16 16 36 20 61 Pedestrians 11 12 10 12 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 11.5 10.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) 4 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 631 659 pX, platoon unblocked 0.97 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.97 vC, conflicting volume 640 586 988 1258 310 954 1282 337 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 600 600 632 632 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 388 658 322 650 vCu, unblocked vol 556 373 687 975 73 650 1001 243 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 99 80 96 98 92 95 92 cM capacity (veh/h) 974 1084 439 388 885 442 394 725 direction Lane.# EB 1 EB 2 E6 3 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 32 317 259 9 385 243 120 117 Volume Left 32 0 0 9 0 0 88 36 Volume Right 0 0 100 0 0 51 16 61 cSH 974 1700 1700 1084 1700 1700 541 Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.19 0.15 0.01 0.23 0.14 0.24 0.22 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 1 0 20 Control Delay (s) 8.8 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 15.1 13.5 Lane LOS A A C B Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.1 15.1 13.5 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 5 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2557: 28 AV S & S 312 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EST BBR WBL WBT %NBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ cT 4r *T r Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Volume (vph) 307 2 76 2 0 0 122 206 2 0 185 348 Future Volume (vph) 307 2 76 2 0 0 122 206 2 0 185 348 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flaw rate (vph) 307 2 76 2 0 0 122 206 2 0 185 348 Direction, Lane # EB 1 W81 NB 1 SB 1 S9 2 Volume Total (vph) 385 2 330 185 348 Volume Left (vph) 307 2 122 0 0 Volume Right (vph) 76 0 2 0 348 Hadj (s) 0.06 0.20 0.10 0.02 -0.68 Departure Headway (s) 7.4 6.2 6.4 5.7 Degree Utilization, x 0.6 0.00 0.56 0.33 0.55 Capacity (veh/h) 380 556 544 615 Control Delay (s) 19.8 10.4 16.8 11.2 14.1 Approach Delay (s) 19.8 10.4 16.8 13.1 Approach LOS C B C B Intersection Summa Delay 16.1 Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2753: 21 PI S & S 316 St 5/5/2016 --* -,* f- '4-- 4,, /01 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations T+ + Traffic Volume (vehlh) 140 65 50 160 194 43 Future Volume (Veh/h) 140 65 50 160 194 43 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 1% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.92 0.92 0.72 0.72 Hourly flow rate (vph) 169 78 54 174 269 60 Pedestrians 20 21 21 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 2 2 2 Right turn flare (veh) 12 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 523 460 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 268 531 250 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 229 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 302 vCu, unblocked vol 268 531 250 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.5 6.3 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.5 tF (s) 2.2 3.6 3.4 p0 queue free % 96 57 92 cM capacity (veh/h) 1273 628 752 0irectlon, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NS 1 Volume Total 247 54 174 329 Volume Left 0 54 0 269 Volume Right 78 0 0 60 1715 Volume to Capacity Vol 0.15 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.43 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 3 0 Control Delay (s) 0.0 8.0 0.0 14.1 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.9 14.1 Approach LOS B [rAersection Summary Average Delay 6.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 7 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3031: SW 320 St & 14 War SW 5/5/2016 'A --I. w-- Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR S8L SBR Lane Configurations tT tt. y Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 706 1311 22 13 35 Future Volume (Veh/h) 13 706 1311 22 13 35 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 13 706 1311 22 13 35 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1343 1721 686 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1332 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 389 vCu, unblocked vol 1343 1721 686 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 97 93 91 cM capacity (veh/h) 505 198 383 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 13 353 353 874 459 48 Volume Left 13 0 0 0 0 13 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 22 35 505 1700 727 Vol Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.51 .27 .16 0.16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0 0 14 Control Delay (s) 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.0 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.2 0.0 19.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.5 _ Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 8 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3032: 13 PI SW & SW 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tT+ t+ y Traffic Volume (vehm) 713 9 83 1333 3 58 Future Volume (Veh/h) 713 9 83 1333 3 58 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1 % -1 % 2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 713 9 83 1333 3 58 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 732 1570 381 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 728 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 842 vCu, unblocked vol 732 1570 381 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 90 99 90 cM capacity (veh/h) 861 276 607 bjmdpm; Lane.,#- EB 1 EB 2 VVB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 475 247 83 666 666 61 Volume Left 0 0 83 0 0 3 Volume Right 0 9 0 0 0 58 cSH 1700 1700 861 i70 573 Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.15 0.10 0.39 0.39 0.11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 8 9 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 12.0 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 12.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 9 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3033: 11 PI SW & SW 320 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations +T+ tt Y Traffic Volume (veh/h) 765 5 49 1407 4 36 Future Volume (Veh/h) 765 5 49 1407 4 36 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1 % -1 % -13% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 765 5 49 1407 4 36 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 780 1589 405 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 778 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 812 vCu, unblocked vol 780 1589 405 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 94 99 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 826 284 586 D.irection,Lane.# ES 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 510 260 49 704 704 40 Volume Left 0 0 49 0 0 4 Volume Right 0 5 0 0 0 36 cSH 1700 1700 826 _0 530 Volume to Capacity 0.30 0.15 0.06 0.41 0.41 0.08 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 5 6 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 9.6 0.0 0.0 12.3 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 12.3 Approach LOS B Intersection Suminary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 10 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3034: SW 320 St & 10 PI SW 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations tt tT4 y Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 796 1439 33 15 5 Future Volume (Veh/h) 5 796 1439 33 15 5 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% -1 % 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 796 1439 33 15 5 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1482 1884 756 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1466 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 418 vCu, unblocked vol 1482 1884 756 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 91 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 446 169 345 Direction, Lane 4 EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 S8 1 Volume Total 5 398 398 959 513 20 Volume Left 5 0 0 0 0 15 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 33 5 446 1.23 1730 94 Volume to Capacity Vol 0.01 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.56 0.30 .10 0.10 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 9 Control Delay (s) 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.7 Lane LOS B D Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 25.7 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 11 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3036: SW 320 St & 7 Av SW 5/5/2016 Movement EBL EBT WBT VVBR SBL SBR - Lane Configurations I ++ +T y Traffic Volume (veh/h) 6 809 1490 21 9 4 Future Volume (Veh/h) 6 809 1490 21 9 4 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 1 % Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 6 809 1490 21 9 4 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1521 1937 776 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1510 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 426 vCu, unblocked vol 1521 1937 776 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 99 94 99 cM capacity (veh/h) 431 160 335 Direction, Cane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 6 404 404 993 518 13 Volume Left 6 0 0 0 0 9 Volume Right 0 0 0 0 21 4 431 1700 1730 90 Volume to Capacity Vol 0.01 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.58 0.30 .07 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft) 1 0 0 0 5 Control Delay (s) 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.3 Lane LOS B D Approach Delay (s) 0.1 0.0 25.3 Approach LOS D Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 12 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3037: 6 PI SW & SW 320 St 5/5/2016 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations tT+ Tt r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 819 20 103 1390 11 46 Future Volume (Veh/h) 819 20 103 1390 11 46 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade -2% 0% -1 % Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 819 20 103 1390 11 46 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) 4 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 1016 pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 839 1730 420 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 829 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 901 vCu, unblocked vol 839 1730 420 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 87 96 92 cM capacity (veh/h) 791 245 583 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 546 293 103 695 695 57 Volume Left 0 0 103 0 0 11 Volume Right 0 20 0 0 0 46 cSH 1700 1700 791 722 Volume to Capacity 0.32 0.17 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.08 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 11 6 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 13.4 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 13.4 Approach LOS B lnterseaon 8ummary Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 13 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3043: 5 AV S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 --11. ",* j- '*'-- 4\ /1, Movement FBT EBR WBL VVBT NBL NSR Lane Configurations tT+ Vi ff r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1114 7 98 1698 7 75 Future Volume (Veh/h) 1114 7 98 1698 7 75 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 1% -2% 2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1114 7 98 1698 7 75 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) 4 Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 980 1157 pX, platoon unblocked 0.69 vC, conflicting volume 1131 2182 580 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1128 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 1055 vCu, unblocked vol 1131 1811 580 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 84 97 83 cM capacity (veh/h) 608 228 450 Direction, Lane:# EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 743 378 98 849 849 82 Volume Left 0 0 98 0 0 7 Volume Right 0 7 0 0 0 75 cSH 1700 1700 608 1 0 492 Volume to Capacity 0.44 0.22 0.16 0.50 0.50 0.17 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 14 15 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 15.2 Lane LOS B C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 15.2 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.4% ICU Level of Service 8 Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 14 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3047: 10 Av S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 --11- -%* I- 4\ t", Movek6nt EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 0 �+ Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1257 3 64 1883 0 36 Future Volume (Veh/h) 1257 3 64 1883 0 36 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 2% -4% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1257 3 64 1883 0 36 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) 520 661 pX, platoon unblocked 0.86 0.68 0.86 vC, conflicting volume 1270 2348 650 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1268 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 1080 vCu, unblocked vol 982 1105 259 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 89 100 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 594 256 624 Direction. Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WS 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 Volume Total 838 422 64 942 942 36 Volume Left 0 0 64 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 3 0 0 0 36 cSH 1700 1700 594 769 624 Volume to Capacity 0.49 0.25 0.11 0.55 .55 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 9 5 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 11.1 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.4 11.1 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3053: 21 PI S & S 320 St 5/5/2016 :11 ,* r %,(- '.- ',- 4\ T r' \► Movement EBU EBL EST EBR WBU WBL WBT W8R NBL NBT NBR SBI: Lane Configurations TTk Zi ++T r Traffic Volume (veh/h) 3 60 1068 60 1 74 1583 88 0 0 131 0 Future Volume (Veh/h) 3 60 1068 60 1 74 1583 88 0 0 131 0 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 5% 2% 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 60 1068 60 0 74 1583 88 0 0 131 0 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 641 567 pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.91 0.78 0.78 0.91 0.78 vC, conflicting volume 0 1671 0 1128 2101 3037 386 2382 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 0 674 0 809 688 1884 0 1048 tC, single (s) 0.0 4.1 0.0 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 0.0 2.2 0.0 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 p0 queue free % 0 91 0 90 100 100 87 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 0 675 0 742 166 45 990 107 Direction, Lane #t EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 EB 4 WB 1 WB 2 W8 3 WB 4 NB i SS 1 Volume Total 60 427 427 274 74 633 633 405 131 207 Volume Left 60 0 0 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 88 131 207 cSH 675 1700 1700 1700 '742 1700 990 802 Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.25 0.25 0.16 0.10 0.37 0.37 0.24 0.13 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 0 0 0 8 0 0 11 26 Control Delay (s) 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.2 11.0 Lane LOS B B A B Approach Delay (s) 0.5 0.4 9.2 11.0 Approach LOS A B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.5 _ Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 16 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3053: 21 PI S & S 320 St 4/ Movement SBT 5BR 5/5/2016 Lane Configurations if Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 207 Future Volume (Vehlh) 0 207 Sign Control Stop Grade 0% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 207 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage lzight turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.78 0.74 vC, conflicting volume 3023 572 vC1, stage 1 cont Vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1867 0 tC, single (s) 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 4.0 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 74 cM capacity (veh/h) 46 802 Direction. Lane # Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 17 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3451: 17 Av S & S 324 St 5/5/2016 Movement EBL E B T EBR 1NBL WBT WBR. NBL NET NBR SSL SK SBR Lane Configurations + r +?flA r if Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 399 91 148 553 5 0 0 152 0 0 92 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 399 91 148 553 5 0 0 152 0 0 92 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Grade 2% -1 % -1 % -1 % Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 399 91 148 553 5 0 0 152 0 0 92 Pedestrians 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) 383 pX, platoon unblocked 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 vC, conflicting volume 568 500 991 1273 419 1422 1362 207 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 409 409 862 862 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 582 864 561 500 vCu, unblocked vol 568 417 949 1254 330 1416 1350 207 tC, single (s) 4.1 4.1 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.5 tF (s) 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 pOqueue free % 100 86 100 100 75 100 100 88 cM capacity (veh/h) 992 1042 319 289 605 174 263 786 Directon, Lane # EB 1 EwB 2 WB 1 WB 2 WB 3 NB 1 SIB 1 Volume Total 399 91 286 276 143 152 92 Volume Left 0 0 148 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 91 0 0 5 152 92 cSH 1700 1700 1042 1700 1700 786 Volume to Capacity 0.23 0.05 0.14 0.16 0.08 0.25 0.12 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 12 0 0 10 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 12.9 10.2 Lane LOS A B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 2.2 12.9 10.2 Approach LOS B B Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 18 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3550: Pacific Hwy S & S 328 St 5/5/2016 --* --v t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations i'r W ++T* Traffic Volume (vehm) 0 52 0 1670 2056 37 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 52 0 1670 2056 37 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% -2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 52 0 1670 2056 37 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (f /s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 641 pX, platoon unblocked 0.82 vC, conflicting volume 2651 724 2103 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2238 724 2103 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 86 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 29 362 256 Direction, Lane# EB 1 NB 1 NS 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 52 557 557 557 822 822 448 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 52 0 0 0 0 0 37 cSH 362 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.33 ©.48 0.48 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 16.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C Approach Delay (s) 16.6 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS C intmikoon.$Umra ; Average Delay 0•2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 19 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3750: Pacific Hwy S & S 332 St 5/5/2016 --* --* fl 4\ t 1 �' Movement EBL EBR NBU NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r ttt ttT Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 39 52 40 1733 2067 31 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 39 52 40 1733 2067 31 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 2% -2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 39 0 40 1733 2067 31 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 680 pX, platoon unblocked 0.76 0.76 0.00 0.76 vC, conflicting volume 2740 704 0 2098 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 2192 0 0 1350 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 0.0 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 0.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 95 0 90 cM capacity (veh/h) 26 827 0 386 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 NB 4 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 39 40 578 578 578 827 827 444 Volume Left 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 cSH 827 386 1700 1700 1700 ?00 - r 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.10 0.34 0.34 0.34.4 0.49 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 9 0 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 9.6 15.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) 9.6 0.3 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario - Page 20 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3850: Pacific Hwy S & S 333 St 5/5/2016 t t L4' Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Ttk ttt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 0 62 1570 42 93 64 1940 Future Volume (Veh/h) 0 62 1570 42 93 64 1940 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade -2% 2% -2% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 62 1570 42 0 64 1940 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 890 1110 pX, platoon unblocked 0.87 0.83 0.00 0.83 vC, conflicting volume 2386 564 0 1622 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 744 0 0 1038 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 0.0 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 0.0 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 93 0 88 cM capacity (veh/h) 264 886 0 549 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NH 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 SB 4 Volume Total 62 628 628 356 64 647 647 647 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 Volume Right 62 0 0 42 0 0 0 cSH 886 1700 1700 1700 549 00 Volume to Capacity 0.07 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.12 0.34 0.3V 0.38 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 0 10 0 Control Delay (s) 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) 9.4 0.0 0.4 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 21 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4350: 16 Av S & S 341 PI 5/5/2016 f- T - MDVeMeYft_ WE WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations y tT Vi tt Traffic Volume (veh/h) 48 40 961 43 31 1066 Future Volume (Veh/h) 48 40 961 43 31 1066 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% -5% -1% Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 48 40 961 43 31 1066 Pedestrians 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 signal (ft) 805 701 ,&tream pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.84 0.84 vC, conflicting volume 1598 522 1014 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 992 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 605 vCu, unbloked vol 379 62 646 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.8 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 88 95 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 408 821 783 Di ediinn,.Lane# WB 1 NB i NB 2 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 88 641 363 31 533 533 Volume Left 48 0 0 31 0 0 Volume Right 40 0 43 0 0 0 cSH 529 1700 783 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.17 0.38 0.21 0.04 0.31 0.31 Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 0 3 0 0 Control Delay (s) 13.2 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) 13.2 0.0 0.3 Approach LOS B Intersection Summa Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Mod Pizza 16-101238-CN PW - SL 2017 Horizon Year Scenario Page 22