Loading...
19-100173-UPCiry OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity August 6, 2019 Mr. Ray Vefik CBRE/Heery 1420 5t" Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98101 n*efiknfwps.org Re: File #19-100173-UP; USE PROCESS III APPROVAL Wildwood Elementary School, 2405 South 300th Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Vefik: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor FILE The City of Federal Way has completed the administrative review and hereby issues land use approval and associated conditions of approval to construct the Wildwood Elementary School. The Process III Master Lane Use (ML,U) application submitted on January 10, 2019, and revised June 24, 2019, is hereby conditionally approved per the enclosed Findings for Project Approval (incorporated into this decision in full), and the following conclusions based on those facts: 1. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; 2. The proposal is consistent with all applicable provisions of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC); 3. The proposal is consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare; 4. The streets and utilities in the area of the subject property are adequate to serve the anticipated demand from the proposal; 5. The proposed access to the subject property is at the optimal location and configuration; and 6. Traffic safety impacts for all modes of transportation, both on and off site, are adequately mitigated. The remainder of this letter outlines the land use review process required for this particular site improvement; summarizes the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) process; lists conditions of the land use decision; and provides other procedural information. This land use decision does not authorize initiation of construction activities. REVIEW PROCESS The site is located in a Single Family Residential (RS7.2) zoning district. School uses are permitted in the zone subject to Federal Way Revised Code (F%VRC) 19.200.090. The school use is reviewed through Process III, Project Approval, in conjunction with environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The Director of Community Development makes a written decision on the application based on the criteria listed under FWRC 19.65.100. Project approval does not grant license to begin any type of site work. Mr. Ray Vefik Pagc 2 of 3 August 6, 2019 SEPA PROCESS The responsible official at Federal Way Public Schools (FWPS) issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) for the school rebuild proposal on January 10, 2019. The appeal period for the determination ended on January 28, 2019. Subsequent minor addendums to the SEPA were issued, with no corrections to the initial determination. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The following conditions are reasonably necessary to eliminate or minimize any undesirable effects of granting application approval. Additional technical comments may result from the building permit or engineering review. 1. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, FWPS must sign and record the Stormwater Declaration of Covenant. 2. Prior to the issuance of the Temporary Certificate of Occupancy, or Certificate of Occupancy, all frontage improvements, driveways, and roundabouts shall be designed to meet Federal Way standards; be submitted for review and approval; and be constructed, inspected, and accepted by the city. Acceptance includes submission of an As -built Drawing, as defined in Section 1.2 of the Public Works Development Standards, for review and approval. 3. Prior to permit issuance, a streetlight plan, separate from the onsite lighting plans, must be submitted to the city for review and approval. The streetlights must be installed, inspected, and accepted prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 4. Prior to permit issuance, a right-of-way landscape plan must be submitted to the city for review and approval. Landscaping must be installed, inspected, and accepted prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Flow control and water quality treatment shall meet the requirements of the 2096 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), Enhanced Basic Water Quality and Conservation Flow Control standards. Prior to permit issuance, Best Management Practices shall be fully vetted and applied to the greatest extent practicable. 6. Prior to beginning construction, tree protective fencing shall be installed in accordance with notes #1-5 on sheet L206. 7. Individual technical review comment letters will be sent by their respective plan reviewers regarding building permit #19-100950-CO. 8. Prior to building construction, the applicant must obtain building permit approval. This Use Process III site plan approval decision does not grant building permit approval. Technical review letters for the building permit will be sent by the individual department reviewer. BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS This Process III land use decision does not constitute a building permit, or authorize clearing/grading activities. The associated building permit application (19-100960-00-CO) is currently under review. Any changes as a result of the Process III approval must be reflected on the submitted building permit plans. 19-100173-00-UP Doc. LD. 79452 Mr. Ray Vefik Page 3 of 3 August 6, 2019 Additional individual technical review comment letters will be sent by their respective plan reviewers regarding building permit #19-100950-CO. If you have any questions regarding the building permit review, please contact the Permit Center at 253-835-2607, or tretiter(iDcityoEfederaluay.com. APPROVAL DURATION Per FWRC 19.15.100(2), unless modified or appealed, the Process III decision is valid for five years from the date of issuance of the decision. Time extensions to the decision may be requested prior to the lapse of approval following the provisions listed in FWRC 19.15.110. The improvements must be substantially completed within the five-year time period, or the land use decision becomes void. APPEALS Per FWRC 19.05.360, the effective date of issuance is three calendar days following the date of this letter, or August 9, 2019. Pursuant to FWRC 19.65.120(1), this land use decision may be appealed by the applicant, any person who submitted written comments or information, or any person who has specifically requested a copy of the decision. In compliance with FWRC 19.65.120(2), any appeal must be in the form of a letter delivered to the Community Development Department, with the established fee, and within 14 days after the effective date of issuance of this decision, or August 23, 2019. The appeal letter must contain a statement identifying the decision being appealed, along with a copy of the decision; a statement of the alleged errors in the director's decision, including identification of specific factual findings and conclusions of the director disputed by the person filing the appeal; and the appellant's name, address, telephone number, fax number, and any other information to facilitate communications with the appellant. The Federal Way Hearing Examiner will hear any appeals of the Process III decision. CLOSING This land use decision does not waive compliance with future City of Federal Way codes, policies, and standards relating to this development. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Associate Planner Natalie Kamieniecki at 253- 835-2638, or n,-ttalie-k-amieniecki@citvoffeder-il,,vay.co.m. Sincerely, 3_�� Brian Davis Community Development Director enc: Exhibit "A" Findings for Project Approval Approved Land Use Plans c: Natalie Kamieniecki, Associate Planner Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Mike Benzien, Federal Way Public Schools, mbtnricn(d1fwps& rg Casey Moore, Federal Way Public Schools,: mtnorunfins.ur�� Sam Schafer, Integrus Architecture, axchafc ?icitcgtusareli.ci)m 19-100173-00-UP Do I.D. 79432 -t PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF 33325 8'h Avenue South A.. Federal Way Federal Way Fax 98835-2709 253-835-2700; Fax 253-835-270I CefIter'ti w., oppor C u n iy W1Y�t'.CIiVUIi[[�iI11I L1;1/•.ti�Yl_�1 CAPA CITY RESER VE CERTIFICATE (CRC This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is made this 28`h (letil of Much 2019 by the City of Federal Way (COFW), a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter called the "City"). WHEREAS; the developer intends to develop the property described as Widtvonrl Lake 1:1eff eyygf'E Schoo reviewed under City file CN Number(s) 19-100174-00-C;V (hereinafter called the "development'); and WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A requires that the City adopt and enforce ordinances which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of service on a transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted in the comprehensive plan, unless transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of the development are made concurrent with the development; and WHEREAS, the City adopted its comprehensive plan in November 1995; and WHEREAS, Chapter 19 of the COFW Revised Code was amended by the creation of Chapter 19.90 Division III on June 10, 2006 by Ordinance 06-525 effective January 1, 2007; and NOW, THEREFORE, a concurrency certificate is issued for the development of 63,590 SF Elementary School based on the facts and conditions set forth herein. Development Parameters This CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION is based on the following development: Development type: Elementary School Development size: 63,590 SF Property address: 2405 South 300" Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel No. (s): 042104-9167 Number of New PM Peak Hour Vehicles Trips Generated: 28 Validity of Concurrency Determination This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid only for the specific development approval consistent with the development parameters and the City file number contained within this certificate. If the development is changed, expired, cancelled or withdrawn, it will be subjected to reevaluation for concurrency purposes. Terms of the Capacity Reserve Certificate This CAPACITY RESERVE CERTIFICATE is valid until the underlying development permit expires, is withdrawn or cancelled, whichever occurs first. Approved By: Date: D r Z ` Printed Name: ttichard A. Perez. P.E Title: City Traffic Engineer CITY OF t Federal Way CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor March 14, 2019 Federal Way Public Schools Mike Benzien, Executive Director 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003-5433 RE: Permit #19-100558-00-SM; WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, 2405 S 300th St., Federal Way Dear Mr. Benzien: This letter responds to your request to modify the required street improvements along South 300th Street, which abuts the above -referenced property, and increase driveway width as part of the proposal for the redevelopment of Wildwood Elementary School. After evaluating the existing conditions along the referenced street, review of Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) provisions (Sections 19.135.070 and 19.135.090) and direction provided by the City Council, the Public Works Department herby denies the request, as follows: Based on daily traffic volumes provided in the traffic memorandum by TENW (Read, M.,P.E, 11/16/18), SW 300th Street is classified as a Minor Collector, corresponding to City Standard Street Section `S', which requires a 36-foot paved roadway (2 10-foot drive lanes with 8-feet of parking on each side), 4-foot planter strips with street trees, 5-foot sidewalks, and 3-foot utility strips with street lights, within a 60-foot right of way. Existing roadway improvements along this property frontage consist of two 10-foot travel lanes, with curb and gutter on the north side and on the south side (school frontage), an 8-foot wide parking lane delineated by a solid white paint stripe and extruded curb separating it from a 4-foot wide shoulder/walking path. The existing right of way width of 60-feet is consistent with the type `S' street section. There is a residential area with four driveways across the street from the school. This area is signed "No Parking". Several requests were presented in modification letter. The first was to eliminate the existing parking on the south side, which would result in no parking on S 300th Street for the length of the school frontage. This request will require the applicant to hold a public meeting, resulting in the residents agreeing to the parking removal. In addition, a queuing analysis must be provided showing sufficient onsite storage in the parent pickup area. Otherwise, on -street parking is required on the south side of the street as in the existing condition. The request is also for 10-foot wide travel lanes. Given the volume of two-way bus traffic, staff recommends two 12-foot travel lanes. Lacking the requirements stated above to allow elimination the \\CFWFILE 1 \Applications\CSDC\PROD\dots\save\ 156155_78863_ 130811 I O;DOC parking, staff may support a modification of the Type `S" standard to include two 12-foot wide travel lanes and one 8-foot wide parking lane on the south side of the street, for a total pavement width of 32- feet. The project must include appropriate tapers and transitions at each end of the improvements. The next request to eliminate "full 10 feet of existing pavement replacement" is not clear. That has never been a requirement for this project. Grind and overlay requirements will apply once the final improvements and existing cross slope has been established. Please note that ADA requirements are triggered by a street overlay and may impact all four comers of the intersections. The request also asks that the City allow a 40-foot wide driveway approach for the bus driveway. The engineering plans currently depict a driveway approach with curb returns, which is a non-standard driveway approach and must be specifically requested. Otherwise the City's standard Commercial Curb and Gutter Section Driveway, Detail 3-6A, shall be installed. While both the wider driveway width and the curb returns could be considered, supporting information must be provided to prove necessity. Lacking information that was previously requested in the Preapplication Conference Summary letter (Willoughby -Oakes, Leila, "File #18-103301-0-PC, Preapplication Conference Summary" Received by Ray Vefik & Mike Benzien, 9/14/18), including bus turning movement diagrams and sight distance analyses, this request is denied. Conditions As stated in the Preapplication Conference Summary letter referenced above, the applicant is required to provide bus turning movement diagrams, a queuing analysis for the parent pickup area, and sight distance analyses for both driveways. Only then can appropriate road and driveway widths, driveway locations, and curb configurations be established. Results of the public meeting are also required if the applicant wishes to alter the existing parking location. Please note that each variation from City standard must be specifically requested. Should you have any questions please contact Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer at (253) 835-2732. Desire6 Winkler, P.E. Deputy Public Works Director Enclosure: City Standard Detail 3-6A (Commercial Driveway Approach) cc: Natalie Kamieniecki, Associate Planner Erik Preston, Traffic Engineer Project file (ad) Day file \\CF WFILE i\Applications\CSDC\PROD\docs\save\ 156155 _78863_ 1308 1110. DOC CITY OF Federal Way Centered on Opportunity Mr. Ray Vefik CBRE/Heery 1420 5th Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98101 rvefik c fwps.com Re: File #19-100173-UP; TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENT LETTER Wildwood Elementary School, 2405 South 300th Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Vefik: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www.cityoffederalway.com Jim Ferrell, Mayor March 14, 2019 FILE City staff has completed the initial review of your Process III Master Land Use (NII,U) application submittal package. Site improvements include the replacement of the Wildwood Elementary School building, stormwater treatment, play field, parking reconfiguration, and landscaping. TECHNICAL COMMENTS Unless otherwise noted, the following comments provided by staff reviewing your project must be addressed prior to issuing the administrative site plan decision. Please direct questions regarding any of the technical comments to the appropriate staff representative. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — PLANNING DIVISION Natalie Kamieniecki, 253-835-2638, natalie.kamieniecki@cityoffederalway.com 1. Not all reports or documents referenced in the SEPA checklist were provided to the city. Please provide the following reports for the city's files: Subsurface Investigation Report; and PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc., (9/21) and Soils Analysis to detect the presence of historic arsenic and/or lead contamination. 2. The geotechnical engineering report is preliminary and does not reflect the final site design. The report must be updated to reflect an analysis of the proposed design and any additional recommendations as applicable. 3. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Cade (FWRC) 19.125.160, no improvement or structure may be in a required yard except as follows: "(5) Fences and railings not over six feet in height may be located in required yards." Please demarcate clearly where proposed new fencing is located. The fence height must be a maximtun of six feet in height, or be relocated outside the required yard setbacks, as applicable. In addition, FWRC 19.115.090(1)(fl requires such fencing to contain vinyl -coated mesh, powder -coated poles, dark color(s), and architectural element(s), such as pole caps and/or a decorative grid pattern. Provide fence details of how this requirement is met. Mr. Ray Vefik Page 2 of 8 March 14, 2019 4. Sheet L200 lists incorrect parking lot landscape calculations. Per FWRC 19.125.070(2), Type IV landscaping is required in the amount of 22 square feet per parking stall when 50 or more parking stalls are provided. A total of 71 parking stalls are provided. Please revise the calculations for required parking lot landscaping. 5. Pedestrian connections from the two parking lots located in the northeast of the school building are needed. Per FWRC 19.115.050(4), all pedestrian pathways through asphalt parking areas require a variation in paved texture and color. Approved methods of delineation include stone, brick or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, or stamped and colored concrete. Please provide material choice on the resubmitted sheets. 6. Please provide either a color rendition of the elevation drawings with a material list, or the color and materials board with the resubmittal. 7. The building design provides alternative methods to organize and shape the structural elements instead of providing the significant structural modulation stated in FWRC 19.115.100(3). Staff will consider the alternative method to satisfy community design guidelines if all of the following architectural and accessory design elements listed in FWRC 19.115.060(3)(b) are provided along the west elevation: • Window openings with visible trim material, or painted detailing that resembles trim; • Artwork such as mosaics, murals, decorative masonry or metal patterns or grillwork, sculptures, relief, etc., over a substantial portion of the blank wall surface. (The Federal Way arts cominission may be used as an advisory body at the discretion of the planning staff); • Architectural features such as setbacks, indentations, overhangs, projections, articulated cornices, bays, reveals, canopies, and awnings; and • Material variations such as colors, brick or metal banding, or textural changes. 8. Per FWRC 19.275.080, temporary trailers, buildings, or other structures used for construction offices, or outdoor storage containers used temporarily to store construction materials, and normally associated with construction of a building or development, are permitted on the subject property during building or development subject to Process I approval, or integration into the land use process applicable to the underlying project. To avoid requiring a separate Process I application, staff recommends you include a plan that depicts the location of temporary trailers and/or construction materials with the Process III resubmittal. PUBLIC WORKS — DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION Ann Dower, 253-835-2734, kevin.peterson@cityoffederalway.com Technical Information Report 1. The underground detention facility must be approved by the Surface Water Management Division. A request must be submitted providing justification for the need to place it underground. 2. The geotechnical report states that there are fill soils on this site. Have the geotechnical engineer establish where fill soils are within the footprint of the detention facility. Per Section 5.1.3.1 of the King County 19-100173-00-UP Doc. I.D. 78703 Mr. Ray Vefik Page 3 of 8 March 14, 2019 Surface Water De ign Manual (KCSWDK, provide an analysis for the stability and constructability of the detention facility in fill soils as necessary. 3. If the geotechnical engineer finds fill soils within the footprint of the detention facility, provide verification from the Stormtech Chamber manufacturer that this is a suitable situation for their product, and provide any additional measures needed to prevent infiltration or perched water from the detention system. Page 3 4. The amount of pollution generating impervious area within the public right-of-way has not been determined at this time. Once the right-of-way modification request is processed, flow control and water quality requirements will be determined. The applicant will be required to provide the actual square footage of pollution -generating and non -pollution generating impervious areas, not a general statement. Core Requirement # 1 5. Page 2 of the TIR references several discharge points, while this narrative references one. All narrative must be consistent throughout the report. Page 4 6. Provide the calculations establishing the exemption for flow control within the public right-of-way. These should be completed after the right-of-way modification is finalized, but before final land use approval. Page 5 7. The total amount of pollution -generating impervious surface within the public right-of-way must be provided by the applicant once the right-of-way modification is finalized. Water quality treatment may be required. Page 7 8. For drainage complaints, please contact SWM Engineering Technician Paul Heller at 253-835-2754, or paul.heUer@citvQ.Efederat-,,v-,Lv.com. King County does not track complaints within the City of Federal Way. 9. Figure 6 of the Downstream Drainage Map does not match city drainage information. Please contact Paul Heller for city records and resolve the differences. 10. Include photos with descriptions of the downstream area within at least 1/4 mile downstream of each of the basins. The public right-of-way must be included in this analysis. Page 11 11. Provide a map of the bypass area(s). Outline how the bypass area(s) meet the criteria outlined in KCSWDM Section 1.2.3.2.E. The detention facility should be oversized to compensate for bypass areas, or BMP's, or other flow control should be provided. Additional treatment methods should also be incorporated into the design. Page 12 12. The MGS flood report was not attached as Appendix B. This must be included. 19-100173-00-UP Doc. I.D. 78703 Mr. Ray Vefik Page 4 of 8 March 14, 20'19 13. Low Impact Development measures must be incorporated into this design. Type,and location shall be determined prior to application for a building permit. If dispersion is not feasible, then soils logs and infiltration testing must be provided to determine applicability of infiltration measures. Page 13 14. Provide design criteria and WSDOE GULD approval for Biofiltration Swales and Media Filter Drains. All water quality methods must meet the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment requirements. Page 14 15. Provide a plan of the four water quality sub -basins and bypass areas. The play area, since it is gated for traffic, must be treated. Please clarify. Page 15 16. Provide a full evaluation of all Low Impact Development BMP's and select those that will be provided on this site. Preliminary sizing must be included in the TIR and location must be shown on the plans. 17. Flow control and water quality for frontage improvements will be revisited once the right-of-way modification is finalized. Both are required for the full frontage, whatever the outcome of the modification decision. Appendix A and B 18. Conveyance, detention, and treatment sizing must be submitted at this time. Plans 19. No Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) or Certificate of Occupancy (CO) will be approved until all stormwater and frontage improvements are installed, inspected, and approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Department. 20. Explain how basic solid waste requirements are being met, and identify facilities on the site plans. Grading and Drainage (200 series) 21. The plans call out a media filter drain, but the referenced detail is for a compost amended bioswale. Resolve the differences. I did not find that compost amended bioswales have GULD approval for Enhanced Treatment, so they would not be approved for water quality treatment for this site. 22. Provide catch basin numbers, flow directional arrows, and invert/rim elevations. 23. It appears that the storm line from the school roof, sheet C203, bypasses detention. This is not acceptable. 24. Please review both driveways for safety and navigability for buses and the travelling public. A landing is required per the Federal Way standards, which may need to be adjusted for bus length. 25. Please review both driveways for additional flow control and treatment measures. Neither appears to be addressed. Allowing the storm runoff from such large areas to go uncontrolled may create hazardous 19-100173-00-UP Doc. I.D. 78703 Mr. Ray Vefik Page 5 of 8 March 14, 2019 walking or driving conditions in very cold weather. If the flow control facility is sized to over -detain to compensate for the driveways or frontage improvements, please document this in the TIR. Public Riubt-of-1 ay (600 series) 26. Include utilities in the roadway cross sections_ 27. Street lighting and street trees must be shown conceptually for land use approval. Detailed street lighting plans will be required during building permit review. Street trees, with the associated city detail, may be included in the landscape plans. 28. Revise street improvements to correspond to the approved right-of-way modification. 29. Overlay requirements, as outlined in the September 14, 2018, DRC letter are for full -width grind and overlay of South 300t" Street. This is based on if open cut is required for the water line connection. 30. When a street is overlaid, ADA requirements are triggered. Upgrades to each leg of the intersection will be required. PUBLIC WORKS — TRAFFIC DIVISION Erik Preston, 253-835-2744, erik.preston@cityoffederalway.com General 1. Additional traffic analysis prepared by engineer licensed in the state of Washington is required for this development project and should include the following analysis missing from the original TIA: = Queuing analysis at the parent drop-off/pick-up driveway. R School bus vehicle turning diagram at the east driveway. Update the school safe walking routes and identify potential mitigation measures. The TIA should -also address the project's traffic impacts on the surrounding neighborhood and recommend necessary measures, such as traffic calming devices or other measures as needed, to minimize the project's impact resulting from the revised traffic circulation. 2. The information in the SEPA document, traffic report, and plan set should be consistent. For example, the SEPA document and the TIA state different square footage of the proposed school. 3. The plan set should depict the improvement(s) specified or identified in the SEPA document and traffic report. Plan Set 4. Add the multi -use path connection to neighborhoods to the south and southwest per previous comments, and as required to match the existing school safe walking route plans and block perimeter requirements as required under FWRC 18.55.010 and 19.135.251. This should be a 12-foot paved path with pedestrian - level lighting in a 20-foot tract or right-of-way per Drawing No.3-AA. 19-100173-00-UP Doc. I.D. 78703 Mr. Ray Vefik Page 6of8 March 14, 2019 5. Realign the west driveway approximately seven feet east to better align with the centerline of 24th Place South (similar to the existing driveway). This will improve traffic flow and also help protect (separate) students walking and waiting on the southwest corner of the driveway from vehicles turning into the driveway. 6. Street trees may need to be removed or relocated in future plans so they do not conflict with streetlight placement. 7. Curb bulb -outs will be required on the east and west sides of each school driveway to minimize pedestrian crossing distances, better organize inbound and outbound traffic, and restrict parking near the driveways. A raised crosswalk on the west leg of the west driveway is also required. These elements may not be required if mini -roundabouts are constructed. 8. The 28-foot wide street shown in the plan is not wide enough to accommodate on -street parking on one side of the street and two lanes of traffic that include school busses. A right-of-way modification for this cross-section has not been approved. Based on traffic volumes from the TIA (625 AM), a Type "S" street (36 feet `vide) is more appropriate. However, staff may support a modification to approve a 32-foot street (Type "U"), which would provide an eight -foot parking lane and two 12-foot lanes. The complete removal of parking is not preferred by the city and would require a neighborhood meeting with the effected residents, obtaining consensus from those neighbors on the parking removal. 9. Show the conceptual streetlight design with the South 300th Street frontage improvements. Streetlights built to city standards will be required as part of frontage improvements on South 300th Street. 10. The city does not concur with the TIA recommendation to install speed bumps (or humps) on South 300th Street between 24th Place South and 26th Avenue South (missing from the plans). The grades of the existing street exceed eight percent in these proposed locations, or are in front of residential driveways. To mitigate these issues, the city recommends changing the intersection control at each intersection to mini -roundabouts, which have lower sight distance requirements, help to calm traffic, and provide many safety benefits. Mini -roundabouts are able to be constructed relatively economically as part of other roadway work and can be designed to accommodate school busses. 11. Provide school bus turning diagrams at the bus driveway to ensure the school bus can enter, maneuver, and leave the site without encroaching onto opposing traffic lanes or mounting a curb. 12. The on -site parent drop-off and pick up storage must be designed to accommodate the 95th percentile queue length. Verify that queues will not back up onto South 300th Street. 13. A mid -block pedestrian path from the walkway between the driveway loops to the new sidewalk on South 300th Street will be required between 24th Place South and 26th Avenue South. 14. The walking path connecting to South 302❑d Place sidewalk near 25th Place South must be improved to an asphalt hard pavement surface (similar to 3-AA) within the existing right-of-way boundaries (and fencing). Show this improvement on an off -site improvements sheet with other school walking route improvements. 19-100173-00-UP Doc. I.D. 78703 Mr. Ray Vefik Page 7 of 8 March 14, 2019 15. Show the minor pavement widening in the northeast corner of the 23rd Avenue South/South 300f Street intersection that is required to create a continuous route for the established and improved recommended walking route. LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT Brian Ashbury, 253-946-5407, basbury@lakehaven.org Water • Lakehaven issued a Water Certificate of Availability for the proposed project/property on February 5, 2019; the certificate is valid for one-year from the date of issuance. • Hydraulic model results (FF #345a) for the proposed onsite water distribution system indicate that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable system liquid velocity of 10 ft/s, at no less than 20 psi, will be exceeded at a fire flow rate above 1,800 GPM. This flow figure depicts the calculated performance of the existing water distribution system under high demand conditions. • A Developer Extension (DE) Agreement was executed between Lakehaven and Federal Way Public Schools on January 9, 2019, to manage construction of the proposed onsite water distribution system. However, no water system plans have yet been submitted to Lakehaven to commence the initial DE plan review processes. A new onsite water main will connect to the existing water main in South 3001h Street. Sewer • Lakehaven issued a Sewer Certificate of Availability for the proposed project/property on February 5, 2019; the certificate is valid for one-year from the date of issuance. • The applicant has proposed a new sewer service connection to an existing sewer service stub along the south margin of South 3001h Street. 0 A separate Lakehaven Sewer Service Connection Permit is required for each new connection to the sanitary sewer system, or any modification (disconnect, etc.) to an existing sewer service connection, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current "Fees and Charges Resolution." APPLICATION STATUS The review period for the Use Process III application has stopped and the application is on hold until requested items are resubmitted. When resubmitting requested information, please provide a written response to each of the above -referenced items, four copies of corrected reports, and six copies of corrected full size plans with the enclosed completed resubmittal form. Note: enlargement plans are not needed. The overall site plans/landscape plans provide sufficient details. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.050, if an applicant fails to provide additional information to the city within 180 days of being notified that such information is requested, the application shall be deemed null and void and the city shall have no duty to process, review, or issue any decisions with respect to such an application. 19-100173-00-UP Doc. I.D. 78703 Mr. Ray Vefik Page 8 of 8 March 14, 2019 If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835- 2638, or natalie.kamieniecki@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, t"111 xjot4k 'Af Natalie Kamieniecki Associate Planner enc: Resubmittal Information Handout Brian Davis, Community Development Director Ann Dower, Development Services Manager Erik Preston, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Mike Benzien, Federal Way Public Schools, mbenzien@fwps.org 19-100173-00-UP Doc. I.D. 78703 CITY OF �. Federal Way Centered on Opportunity February 7, 2019 Mr. Ray Vefik CBRE/Heery 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98101 rvefik(a &ps.org Re. File #19-100173-00-UP; LETTER OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Wildwood Elementary School, 2405 South 300th Street, Federal Way Dear Mr. Vefik: CITY HALL 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 (253) 835-7000 www. cityoffederalway.. com Jim Ferrell, Mayor The Community Development Department is in receipt of your January 10, 2019, Process III Master Land Use (MLU) application. The proposal includes constructing a new two-story elementary school with associated site improvements. The existing elementary school is to be demolished prior to construction of the new school. Pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.15.045, within 28 days of receiving an application, the city shall determine whether all information and documentation required for a complete application has been submitted. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Please consider this correspondence a formal Letter of Complete Application. Pursuant to FWRC 19.15.045, the application is deemed complete as of February 6, 2018. This determination of completeness is based on a review of your submittal relative to applicable requirements referenced within FWRC 19.15.040. The submittal requirements are not intended to determine if an application conforms to city codes; they are used only to determine if all required materials have been submitted. A 120-day time line for reviewing the Process III application has started as of this date. The city's development regulations allow the department 120 days from the date that an application is deemed complete to take action on the application. However, the 120-day time line will be stopped any time the city requests corrections and/or additional information. You will be informed of the status of the 120-day time line when you are notified in writing that corrections and/or additional information are needed. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Formal processing and review of your applications will now begin. A Notice of Application (NOA) will be posted on the city's official notice boards, published in the Federal Way Mirror, and mailed to the persons within 300 feet of each boundary of the subject property within 14 days of this letter, pursuant to FWRC 19.65.070(2). The city will prepare two Public Notice Boards that the applicant will be responsible for posting on site by February 15, 2019. Further posting instructions and the notice boards will be available for pick-up at Will Call at the 2nd floor of City Hall on February 11, 2019. Mr. Ray Vefik Page. 2 of 2 February 7, 2019 CLOSING The Development Review Committee (DRC) staff is preparing initial technical review comments that will be forwarded to you in a separate correspondence at a later date. Technical review comments may result in a request for additional information and revisions in order to comply with applicable code requirements. If you have any questions regarding this letter or your development project, please contact me at 253-835-2638, or natahe.kamieriiecki@cityoffederalway.com. Sincerely, Natalie Kamieniecki Associate Planner enc: Notice of Application c; Brian Davis, Community Development Director Greg Kirk, Plans Examiner Ann Dower, Senior Engineering Plans Reviewer Erik Preston, Senior Traffic Engineer Kathy Mathena, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Mike Benzien, Federal Way Public Schools, mbenxieni[ EW..c�rg 19-100173-00-UP Doc LD. 78739 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING } AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION PUBLIC NOTICE Ken Spurrell, being first duly sworn on oath that he is the Legal Advertising Representative of the Federal Way Mirror a weekly newspaper, which newspaper is a legal newspaper of general circulation and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continuously as a weekly newspaper in King County, Washington. The Federal Way Mirror has been approved as a Legal Newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. The notice in the exact form annexed was published in regular issues of the Federal Way Mirror (and not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, (Ad #844916) a: Public Notice Published 1 time(s) beginning on 02/15/2019 and ending on 02/15/2019. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $120.14. Ken Spurrell Legal Advertising Representative, Federal Way irror Subscribed and sworn to me this 15th Allen F. Nemec, Rotary Public for {JF06r")�2019. f�(lCp�i N�TaRy- ' P NtS Residing in Tacoma, Washington City of Federal Way Var FWM844916 rtOF WA5N���� � �ran�+.d�• �A Fed,eral Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Wildwood Elementary School Re- build Project Description. The proposal Is to replace the existing Wildwood Elementary School with a two- story elementary school building with parking and a play field. Associated site improvements are In- cluded. The existing school will be damollshed prior to the construcilon of the new school. Applicant: Ray Vefik. CBREIHeery,1420 Fifth Ave- nue, Suite 1700, Seattle. WA 98101, 206-835- 0473 Project Location: 2405 South 300th Street 1 Parcel 042104-9167 Application Received: January 10, 2019 Determined Complete: February 6, 2019 Notice of Application: February 15, 2019 Envlronmental Review: The environmental review required under State Environmental Policy Act (SE - PA) has been conducted by Federal Way Public School as lead agency. A MONS was issued on January 10, 2019. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #19- 100173-UP), Conctirrency (Fite #19.100174-Clu) & Street Modification Request (File 919-100558-SM) Environmental Documents & Required Studles: Updated Surface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geotechnlcal Engineering Report, prepared by As- sociated Earth Sciences. Inc.. August 29. 2018. and Technical Information Report, prepared by LPD Engineering, PLLC, Draft January 7. 2019. Development Regulations Used tot Project Mitl- gation: Federal Way Revised Cade (FWRC) Tilte 16 "Surface Water Management." and Title 19, 'Zoning and Development Coda' Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may sub- mit written comments on the land use appllcation to the Director of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on March 4, 2019, Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Availability of Fite-, The official project file, exist- ing environmental documents, and required stud- ies are available for public review at the Depart- ment of Community Development's Permit Center, 33325 Sth Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Natalie Kamieniecki, Associate Plan- ner, 253-835-2638, natalle.kamieniecki@cltyof- fedaralway.com Published In the Federal Way Mirror February 15, 2019 #844916 4k CITY Federalo. Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cifyoffederoJwcy.corn DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION 1, Maria Sr pith hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: 0 Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was ❑ emailed ❑x mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on February 15 2019. Project Name Wildwood Elementary School Rebuild File Number(s) 19-100173-UP Signature Date February 15, 2019 C:\Users\tinop\Desktop\Declaration of Distr bution.doc/Last printed 2/14/2019 4:44:00 PM CITY OF y Federal l!'1lay vo-TICIrU-'-MASTERt I►AAND-U-SE-AFRLICAT-ION - Project Name: Wildwood Elementary School Rebuild i i dk Project Description: The proposal is to -- — - replace the existing Wildwood Elementary , School with a two-story elementary school NI building with parking and a play field. Associated site improvements are included. �� I —� The existing school will be demolished prior to } WiltywWd the construction of the new school. - Ej s hclof ry % Applicant: Ray Vefik, CBRE/Heery, 1420 _ Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700, Seattle, WA 98 10 1,- 206-835-0473 r K I I - Project Location: 2405 South 300"' Street / �anam s. Parcel 042104-9167 - Application Received: January 10, 2019 Determined Complete: February 6, 2019 Notice of Application: February 15, 2019 Environmental Review: The environmental review required under State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) has been conducted by Federal Way Public School as lead agency. A MDNS was issued on January 10, 2019. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #19-100173-UP), Concurrency (File #19-100174-CN) & Street Modification Request (File #19-100558-SM) Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Updated Surface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geoteehnical Engineering Report, prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc., August 29, 2018, and Technical Information Report, prepared by LPD Engineering, PLLC, Draft January 7, 2019. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application to the Director of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on March 4, 2019. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Availability of File: The official project file, existing environmental documents, and required studies are available for public review at the Department of Community Development's Permit Center, 33325 81I' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Natalie Kamieniecki, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638, natalie.kamieniecki@cityoffederalway.com Published in the Federal Way Mirror February 15, 2019 VV0, 0918/0919@ AUanV oane algl;edwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z LeMo} op aj;anbl;� ������ 0918/09 L9® tiaA`d gj!AA algijudwoo „8/9 Z x,, L 7171 George Pearisaeff Robert Miller Michael Fortenberry 30232 23rd S 2329 S 302nd St 30224 23rd Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Leo Kelly Jr Jack Wright Jr Federal Way City Of 30202 23rd Ave S 2304 S 302nd St 33325 8th Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 John Mitchell Malik Haider Lee Schumacher PO Box 16 2321 S 302nd St 30050 23rd Ave S Snoqualmie, WA 98068 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Brandon Lyons Pamela Schumacher Marvin Boyd 30230 23rd Ave S 30050 23rd Ave S 2320 S 302nd Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98002 Kevin Lewis Ted Mittelstadt Grady Austin 30204 26th PI S 30200 26th PI S 2544 S 302nd PI Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Jose Ortiz Theresa Ognoskie Gary Durbin 2538 S 302nd PI 2530 S 302nd PI 2522 S 302nd PI Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Jared Mattoon Abraham Arce Gayle Miller 2514 S 302nd PI 2508 S 302nd PI 2500 S 302nd PI Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98009 Larry Reynolds Lester Hill Socimo Martinez PO Box 1107 855 Trosper Rd SW #108-338 30213 25th PI S Allyn, WA 98524 Tumwater, WA 98512 Federal Way, WA 98003 Brian Steadman Maria Rodriquez Larry Richardson 30221 25th PI S 30222 25th PI S 30212 25th PI S Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Douglas Quigley Jabir Muied Yi Li 2507 S 302nd PI 2513 S 302nd PI PO Box 1284 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Everett, WA 98206 STPPLElabel size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 04A V170 09 L8/09 L9@ tiany oane alglludwoo ww L9 x ww gZ lewjol op allanbll� ����1��� 09 L8/09 L9® keAV gl!m alglledwoo „9/9 Z x „L axislagel D William Teichow Lisa Mesplay Reyes Pina 2529 SE 302nd PI 2537 S 302nd PI 30213 26th PI S Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Usufono Vaisola Kevin Morris Maralyn Anderson PO Box 3723 29843 24th PI S 1911 $W Campus Dr Box 185 Kent, WA 98089 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98023 Wenqin Cen Jose Leon Cedric Davis 29855 24th PI S 29852 24th PI S 29846 24th PI S Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Terry Davidson Jeffrey Bouska Kelly Fox 29838 24th PI S 29832 24th PI S 2424 S 299th St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Russel Garlough Charles Curtis George Pirie 2505 S 299th St 2511 S 299th St 2517 S 299th St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Manjit Singh Vincent Olin Jeffrey Hankemeier 2428 S 300th St 2420 S 300th St 2412 S 300th St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Loren Chandler Zachary McHenry Leonard Hicks 29914 26th Ave S 29908 26th Ave S 1218 S 257th PI Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Des Moines, WA 98198 Schantelle Carter Patricia Wheeler Joshua Elliott 29832 26th Ave S 2310 S 300th St 29844 23rd Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Aaron Swanby Jarod Mills James Gaines 2304 S 300th St 2326 S 300th St 2349 S 298th St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Michael Gardner Courtney Gault Amy Ahlstrom 2318 S 300th 2625 S 298th St 2656 S 300th Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 IAPP.Eso Etiquette do format 25 mm/x'67 mpm colmpat b e a ecoAvery/®51060/8160 09 1.9/09 L9® rUany oaAB alglfedwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z fewJo; op auanbiq 09 L8/09 L5O AUaAy gjIm alq judwoa ,,8/9 Z x,, L ez+c, -,gel �.,,,$ .LI- Norman Dorpat Joan Mordeaux Doug Dibley 5332 Beverly Ave NE 2628 S 300th St 2620 S 300th St Tacoma, WA 98422 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Barbara Pederson Vladimir Dudenko Gary Barber 2614 S 300th St 2613 S 300th St 2619 S 300th St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Suzanne Lansclardi Robin Herold Terome Fulmore 30005 26th Place South 30011 26th PI S 2622 S 301 st St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Gerick Gilbert David Kroeger Andres Melgoza 2618 S 301 st St 705 Renton Ave S 2621 S 301 st St Federal Way, WA 98003 Renton, WA 98057 Federal Way, WA 98003 Philip Strange Ronald Smith David Gwin 2625 S 301 st 2628 S 3Q2nd St 2620 S 302nd St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Ranly Nguyen Mark Emiley Kimo Wasson 29005 Pacific Hwy S #a 2615 S 302nd St 2619 S 302nd St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Patricia Adkins Joseph Rodriguez Timothee Dettweiler 2623 S 302nd St 2627 S 302nd St 2633 S 302nd St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Brandy A Strange Kevin Tuffs Frank Ricci 2634 S 302nd St 30110 26th PI S 20640 6th Ave SW Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Normandy Park, WA 98166 Stephen Austin Kurt Nemmer George Noble 30020 26th PI S 30012 26th Place S 1101 S 4th St Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Renton, WA 98057 William Dehnert Maria Rodriguez Mukhtar Ahmed 30324 24th PI S 30320 24th PI S 30316 24th Pi South Federal Way S Federal Way, WA 98002 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 f%-rA its In rO label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery @5160/8160 etiquette do format 25 mm x 67 mm compatible avec Avery 05160/8160 0918/09190 AJany oane aigjudwoo ww L9 x ww 9Z leWJOI op auanbil� ���► vJ� 0918/0915@) fu9AV gjlm aigilBdwoo ,,8/9 Z x ,� L azle—%el � Dinno Padilla James Gramling Gilbert Gregory 2901 Auburn Way S Apt 16 30308 24th PI S 30304 24th PI S Auburn, WA 98092 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Ralph Hubbard Jr Sarah Johnson Roman Suleanschi 30300 24th PI S 30305 24th PI S 30309 24th PI S Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Federal Way, WA 98003 Delio Carmona Ih6 Property Washington Guanche Ferede 30313 24th PI S 15400 SE 30th PI Ste 100 30323 24th PI S Federal Way, WA 98003 Bellevue, WA 98007 Federal Way, WA 98003 / STAPLES , ttiquette do format 25 mmxr67 mpm compatible b e a ecoAvery/051060/8160 04A w C crJ U U cl King County •1 0. Park r+•pl�,i!a ry 1 � ` Il r a�� 1 -7a `�a8Sir Gareth I rPi4,l 19155 GO _ _ x%p CanterLuty i3iJ•�t r f 'ti'� � � 44G3 1 ,u L�01$iI9¢;Ch 18tr rE 131 1` t735 �n9�t3 , 'Tk-A �. o f 1?, 4- tfFy'17 f� Li4o0 4t _ r U41"O�v O6"i `, `` b €33r7'C'F?-i if�Off C fly# ,.C. t� Cr$ll '.J b Y]4]0CV-4 C rill l' i--- CtiLS n , f, 4' 1�10 1 ti ] i�] : I " , c �. -i'� Is C7a IYn4 0040 •� C 0-,g �_ L•i].CI l :2u '+21 +alaGi,pa,fj �n�u ;1 , nGle r {=}2'1 a0'l r t�l , r 40' GQ lL iN 0' J. I {t ]2r I y f- i3C 1 J r�l 0- 00Lr' ��r� > t v i3 -� ul ! -r]C1 l'G't72 2G ' a 41}C1 ,''�4 �7,$EL31,1�ry�'Os]}I '_�'-'�f?U_C!O0 2 17J1`i}a`t, tiC'�G t ' 5 U ��TRt.T 4 ;��Q k?u r0 L: 02.1. 1 '0,01�5 1'--1C61r'CL'1E,'15 I'.Y}� I-D �s 6�7C'02 ��`23�1 ! �]�O1�S•.�'41 �I�' G9p4+}�tC}U['- ' i E—�. r�1�4 �•.-I •_ lr �, _ _. u75flChift+ u55 ]� �,;•5li�t I �G t� k I �I Li ! .[ .. _ _ �_I J ly�_ Fj i�110040 i G''J hr:r Ij i�{t5f7�i3l7i�IJ~T r '7 i!' �Ff r0 tiyb Y^I 4r7 +4 f- r-- I f G 43i:5ID Ir: 1?Q ILai] I !. I fG 1B �� _ r 0020 d� } I I rnUU ] } _ _-t 5 t} VC tl�liGf-Gt?OO�L r 1 ' " S, "]80_`G•'J�Li� a'7fiC� ts0 I 'I -;ID aaSO =, _ Cl�1, � G 300 �;Ch "1 1$� 1 0 YO (0.?ii L�S0Q311 i -� CS- �yiC+t,O 5 -+ _ 1 -14 Gr�Q rd OQ • G� i '�l •b.0'30 y ; �� ] J r i t kG�.C'G� Oss€7{}U,O�'2C Y _y ££�, I 1r. ' S G� G {2 Lti'r'• 1 �' `fib' L Y0} 2'q� 1 3 jl 1 I' UG!`OL�+7s10C��` +�]�0�]f.�'•C'' ' � 3 it io Gtr G tea_ 154 I� •�,--{ 0 }$ 0 ,I ;, �t� . El`,oG :-'t•Q� �CI� •3�+ r• � � � ° ( ?]�1 917U`u]r15 _ilI y.� I r-''�' I47 5' I 5 G•� rf I J I I. -' f 0� 1 G•2� rU 0 Gl r Q I13T i' �+ z �Yr, Il 3 ii 0 vl 3-4 .,l�l]ll.,� ;' i c- `' (r 7 r 13 r 1� r"r1 3 i1a3 1-- iIJ�;J °`` a f 0 i (IO 1Qt� Q�ii7�1;r, S•1-ai,�yrY5-; fp ;r,. +rtiiri= q[So?�jp'r .�rr�j -.�00 �, ��s .q,j aj 1�L-� Q rr� �! fir!j�0 Or, r, 0}�{�. , I E i �} 7 f -y 90Fs r3 cr n , y �aGS]�- • , rl� �VJ15B.2; _ 1C1 i I 1 I U35 0 "4 I `i I� il'�-1 + I 7 r3iSB5t : =1 4 C 5t� J�F a s{Yq - IT- 9C'1- t3�031il14 49 10 SfI h C11<< - 1) •0• U'i Oi_ CCrlr,'r - ^, (jL'idCfl] (�l'_ s7�55f Oc�S } + l3'1 ~!'� 1. 1) ='^•' ' 7r � -- -_ J, ='rI� liltI��� ti� D t 1.rr, C�0l� UA 7a 7 f. TRCT �_siQ 2i 1 �r GLLGa. i 1 1 �'155 o: 17; 124 s .. ft e 0 '2j0 'SG 0�] Ir itJ jlu '?iSf-0 ; ^ 'T r +1 1fs,i �r � 4 c_ S('j2 + '�10i1 G]�s�_11 �92$rr� }CY3 �5Y)305 a? a0 7 [ air 7 t� J�C iff 5t 17 5 `-', �5 ;7I 031� g --4 t g; ';P_3n d;51`] Qh 1 1 J _� t_ V1'SS1I !—"<1 b _ '�' 12 1 7 . r I I93-41.; @'i 1 CI 0415E-F S ] i �. 5r�0i 10 I • }31 + L F'S 0115� 04L� `+rG'5�15 y_,• �It u 1 -1C L71t:, .��f�j•(�6e5' [t lr�C. a=1„t, a r TC ��Ia6i VR 01Steel b�l K��+, ingG: 1Q5t i uflty.�S Center. King G U-j alllii 1r11 Geer, Ll15r.t+ L40C, 7 0% I_IC4 -' ntya t . r The nfomnallon nc tided on Ihr map has been WV101Ied by Kl fig Coudy calf from a valteal of sovroes and Is subject to change withal nvlice. King county maitas no representations vnwarranowk e>wreas or IrWI W. N 26 to accuracy, eampletanes?, Vmet llesS, or fights iq Iha use o1 such lYformaWn. This dMmOrl la not 1nlcndsd br ow as asum ey prodocl King County steal not be fable lw any general. spedat indhat, ncrottir W• or La cansequensial damages indudng. bul no6I milled lo. 109 revenuesfir lost prone rowiling from fhe use a rris uw d the informaWn contained on this map. Any cale of Ihis map ornrormOon mh cis mep5%;rohbiled exert by King County written permission of King County. Date: 1 /11 /2019 4k OF 10'::tOP Federal Way DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 253-835-7000; Fax 253-835-2609 www.cit offederalwa .cam DECLARATION OF DISTRIBUTION I, E. Tina Piety hereby declare, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, that a: El Notice of Land Use Application/Action ❑ Notice of Determination of Significance (DS) and Scoping Notice ❑ Notice of Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, DNS) ❑ Mitigated Environmental Determination of Nonsignificance (SEPA, MDNS) ❑ Notice of Land Use Application & Optional DNS/MDNS ❑ FWRC Interpretation ❑ Other ❑ Land Use Decision Letter ❑ Notice of Public Hearing before the Hearing Examiner ❑ Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing ❑ Notice of LUTC/CC Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Shoreline Management Permit ❑ Adoption of Existing Environmental Document Was ❑x emailed ❑ mailed ❑ faxed and/or ❑ posted to or at each of the attached addresses on February 13 2019. Project Name Wildwood Elementary School Rebuild File Number(s) 19-10017 r Signature Date February 14. 2019 C:\Users\tinap\Desktop\Declaration of Distdioution.doc/Last printed 2/14/2019 4:39:00 PM Tina Piety From: Ken Spurrell <legals@tacomadailyindex.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 10:30 AM To: Tina Piety Subject: Re: Legal Notices Confirming receiving 3 notices to pub in the FWM on Feb 15th. thanks Ken Ken Spurrell Publisher Direct: 253-232-5219 Internal: 15001 Fax: 253-627-2253 15 Oregon Ave, Suite 101, Tacoma, WA 98409 Sound Publishing Mao Prins Ratcs Online Rates Mcdia KiL Sound Inro On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 10:19 AM Tina Piety <Tina.Piet (,cityoffeder_alway.com> wrote: Hello, Please publish the attached legal notices (Lake Grove Elementary NOA, 19-100178-UP; Mirror Lake Elementary NOA,19-100188-UP; and Wildwood Elementary NOA, 19-100173-UP ) in the Federal Way Mirror's Friday (2/15/2019) issue. Please furnish affidavits of publication. This is for the Community Development account 83722477. Thank you, Tina E. Tina Piety, CAP -OM Administrative Assistant 11 Ae �. o-• F+edleral Way Community Development Department 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Phone:253/835-2601 Fax: 253/835-2609 www.citvoffederalway.com AII:k CITY OF Federal Way NOTICE OF MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name: Wildwood Elementary School Rebuild Project Description: The proposal is to replace the existing Wildwood Elementary School with a two- story elementary school building with parking and a play field. Associated site improvements are included. The existing school will be demolished prior to the construction of the new school. Applicant: Ray Vefik, CBRE/Heery, 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700, Seattle, WA 98101, 206-835-0473 Project Location: 2405 South 300"' Street / Parcel 042104-9167 Application Received: January 10, 2019 Determined Complete: February 6, 2019 Notice of Application: February 15, 2019 Environmental Review: The environmental review required under State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) has been conducted by Federal Way Public School as lead agency. A MDNS was issued on January 10, 2019. Permits Under Review: Use Process III (File #19-100173-UP), Concurrency (File #19-100174-CN) & Street Modification Request (File #19-100558-SM) Environmental Documents & Required Studies: Updated Surface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Geotechnical Engineering Report, prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc., August 29, 2018, and Technical Information Report, prepared by LPD Engineering, PLLC, Draft January 7, 2019. Development Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Title 16 "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code." Public Comment & Appeals: Any person may submit written comments on the land use application to the Director of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on March 4, 2019. Only persons who submit written comments to the Director (address below) or specifically request a copy of the decision, may appeal the decision. Availability of File: The official project file, existing environmental documents, and required studies are available for public review at the Department of Community Development's Permit Center, 33325 8"' Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003. Staff Contact: Natalie Kamieniecki, Associate Planner, 253-835-2638, natalie.kamieniecki@cityoffederalway.com Published in the Federal Way Mirror February 15, 2019 City of Federal Way Community Development 33325 8!h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 City of Federal Way Community Development 33325 8!h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Grady Austin 2544 S 302nd PI Federal Way, WA 98003 k:: .(��-•.1 ...�-f,-.'i�: }1 F,�tiiL � �,i. ;�..� f•�'..,�. .- s� n�.,....rtr��r`c RECFIVED By COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT i)EPARTMENT AU'5TI H KE N;T UTA .1087e r•w-, v- s^s ter,. a� � r � se t1 as A fre eee u s i a s e Marvin Boyd 2320 S 302nd Federal Way, WA 98002 NT)XIE 9199 5C" 1 010r2/21111.9 UNABLE TO 7-'ORWAR D Rey:• rya SR e.atiE . _� * _._ s577- 7 1_7a SkaAVT TLE City of Federal Way VV"A"? It•p Community Development is i-E-8 " L.C) 33325 8tn Avenue South M Federal Way, WA 98003"fl ,"V L.. Usufono Vaisola PO Box 3723 Kent, WA 98089 NIXIE 950 7E. 1, 91.02/211/'19 ��a3 i :,r��.�'Y,�r r�:�w.e t�:5 T�ti7►Zi�Sn'�-sE=+� :i � ni -_ 'wivs?E.����$ ^z � i �? n��ys�rj��' y•�..ai= City of Federal Way Community Development 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 A," 9}.','! .1h "Ir"'Y" 1 C.'•' � !6 f N, Y'4!1'T4'i r ". Jack Wright Jr 2304 S 302nd St Federal Way, WA 98003 .. y,.4F.i�nu���•Y�ni AIfJ�nV�Xi��,FT -"N yN��.u� US A AU'S A N1X1E 980 FE ]: 140 DELIVERABLE��� -436RE'SaED i i_i N AR I IA F-OR-w_1k.R l -3''a -e� C�'. ' jk_: Gqi Ei i i� i7=]� _ 7{� };x a 4.2 154 4x S«�5«1 �«�� 111I11�5"�;�131111 I�111f I�ISf 11�11111!;��]S,IIII S'?�;�S�:Sj 411 S! a. A T n M. • i J . an , o ,.i w,1 .� N ry i City of Federal Way Community Development 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 q4nnq7i Rqq ni 77 on 6Z696 y' l}eag any pu Qz 18LI19B l d P, £0096 `dM `AeM lejapeA 41no$ anusAv 4 SZ£££ ;uawdolanad IC}lunwwoD AEM leJapaA }o f4I3 Suzanne Lansciardi 3oO05 26th Place South Federal Way. WA 98003 NIXIE 9e@ FE 1 21./10 7 Pk jEl' sold � s1@.iill:jls.1���,�ess11.lil.l0,1011110-ii'll.110..bv City of Federal Way Community Development 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 Ted Mittelstadt 30200 26th PI S Federal Way, WA 98003 RETURNED FOR POS COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1-131 4 +�riilt licititi!lHI� 13.i1 1111111tiijiiijii1i l' li►I1iil' ii FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A MGM Future. April 26, 2019 Mayor Jim Ferrell City of Federal Way 33325 gth Ave S Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Wildwood Elementary Site Development Permit Dear Mayor Ferrell, Office of the SUPERINTENDENT As a follow up to the meeting between the Federal Way School District and The City of Federal Way on Thursday April 18, 2019, please accept this letter as documentation and confirmation of the School District's position. Our Civil Engineer, LPD, provided a design that the City reviewed. One of the comments from the City was related to existing site condition ground covers that would necessitate the enlargement of the Flow Control Facility. Based on the attached letter, which is also within the Technical Information Report from our Engineer, the District believes that the system is correctly and appropriately sized and designed. The District understands that if Ecology or any other regulatory authority with jurisdiction, outside of the City of Federal Way, finds the system was not adequately sized by the District's Engineer that the District is solely liable for any penalties, expansion, modification and mitigation of same and further agrees to fully indemnify the City. The District also understands that entering into a storm water covenant with the City is a requirement of this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Respectfully, a� Dr. Tammy Campbell Superintendent, Fede al Way Public Schools,' L Attachment Cc: Cole Elliot, P.E., Development Services Manager, City of Federal Way EJ Walsh, P.E., Public Works Director, City of Federal Way Casey Moore, Director of Capital Projects, FWPS Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations, FWPS Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. 33330 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 p.253.945.2000 1 f.253.945.2011 I www.fwps.org STATE OF WAS INGT N DEPARTMENT OF DC..OLOG Y PC, Box 47600 * fil;vn pia, WA 98,` 04-7600 ®,360-407-0000 711 for Avashin."Ion Relay Service - Pel-sons with a speech disabilii}y can call 877-833-6)347 April 5, 2019 Drew Phillips Fonna Construction Company PO Box 1 ] 489 Olympia, WA 98508-1489 RE: Coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit (CSMiGP) Permit number: Site Name: Location: Disturbed Acres: Dear Drew Phillips: 'V4'AR307765 W'ildwood ElernentarN School 240-5 S 300" St Federal WaN�, WA County: King 6.52 The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) received your Notice of h tent for coverage under Ecology's Construction Stormwater General Permit (CSWGP). This is your pen -nit coverage letter. Your permit coverage is effective April 5, 2019. Please retain this permit coverage letter as the official record of permit coverage for your site. Ecology has approved use of electronic formats as long as they are easily produced on your construction site. A mobile friendly copy of the CSWGP permit, permit forms, and information related to your permit can be viewed and downloaded at w.w�.w..ecolo--,,,.%N-a.LovleCoveraze- ap ckei. Please contact your Permit Administrator, listed below, if you would like to receive a hard copy of the CSWGP. Please take time to read the entire permit and contact Ecology if you have any questions. Electronic Discharge Monitoring Reports (WQWebDM1 R) This pennit requires that Pezmittees submit monthly discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) for the full duration of permit coverage (from issuance date to termination). DMRs must be submitted electronically using Ecology's secure online system, WQWebDMR. To sign up for A.QWebDM:R go to w\,,-w..ecv.wa.eov ro--raiiis�w ermitsl aris:?webdmr.lttm]. If you have questions, contact the portal staff at (360) 407-7097 (Olympia area). or (800) 633-6193!option 3, or email O. W,ebPortal ecy.wa. nov. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 25, 2019 TO: Ann Dower, Development Services Erik Preston, Traffic Division Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue FROM: jDatalie Kamieniecki, Associate Planner PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENT VIA EMAIL FILE NUMBER(s): 19-100173-UP PROJECT NAME: WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT ADDRESS: 2405 S 300TH ST ZONING DISTRICT: RS 7.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demolition of existing school and construction of a new 60,000 square foot school building. PROJECT CONTACT: RAY VEFIK CBRE/HEERY MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Resubmittal Narrative Traffic Impact Analysis SEPA Addendum Memorandums Subsurface Soil UST Investigation Supplemental Arsenic and Lead Soil Sampling Hazardous Materials Survey Report Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Lakehaven Water and Sewer Documents Geotechnical Report Geotechnical Permit Review Comment Response Letter from Tammy Campbell, dated April 26, 2019 Letter from Laurie J Pfarr, dated April 29, 2019 Letter from Jennifer Argraves, dated April 1, 2019 Pedestrian Site Access and Safe Routes to School Technical Information Report Plan Set Drawings -4k CIT Federal Way RE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8`h Avenue South JAN 10 2019 Federal Way, WA 98003 253-835-2607;Fax 253-835-2609 CITY OF FED[: ,.L WAY www.cityoffederalway.com COMMUNITY G%VcL{7PMEN1" Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Directions Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by city staff, and will be integrated into the site plan and/or building permit review process. Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance 1.1 Blind Corners _ ❑Confi Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: ,e Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should be permeable (see through) including landscaping, fencing etc. A © Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around corners. e Other strategy used: 1.2 Site and Building Layout _ ❑Conf Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the ❑Revise use to the street, and between uses _ ❑NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 9 k:\Flandouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy M Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on For Non -Single comers. ■ Family Development Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the dwelling. ■ Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/ retail development should not be from the rear of the building. ■ ffe Offset windows, doorways and balconies to allow for natural observation while protecting privacy. ■ Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view of the street. ■ For Commercial/ Retail/ Industrial If employee entrances must be separated from the main and Community E301, entrance, they should maximize opportunities for natural Facilities surveillance from the street. ■ In industrial developments, administration/offices should be located at the front of the building. ■ Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses of For Surface parking are proposed, provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ Parking Structures �� Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. ■ El*"� Avoid hidden recesses. ■ Locate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. 0 Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people. Parks, plazas, Open Space common areas, and playgrounds should be placed in the front Areas of buildings. Shopping centers and other similar uses should face streets. ■ Other strategy used: PLAYGROUNDS LOCATED DIRECTLY OUTSIDE THE BACK OF THE BUILDINGS IN FULL VIEW AND COMPLETELY SECURED WITH CHAIN LINK FENCING. Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy a Applicable dining Site Plan Review 6 Applicable during Building Permit Review 1.3 Common/Open Space Areas and Public On -Site Open _ ❑Conf Space _ ❑Revise Provide natural surveillance for common/open space areas. _ ❑NA Comments: Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent ffo to main common/open space areas, e.g. playgrounds, swimming pools, etc., and public on -site open space. ■ Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which screens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. 1 Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the building entry. e Ro Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy used: 1.4 Entrances _ Provide entries that are clearly visible. Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Design entrances to allow users to see into them before entering. ■ Entrances should be clearly identified (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. (Applicable during Certificate of ❑ccupancy Inspectiona). Other strategy used: create a secure entry vestibule with controlled entry tr and direct supervision by administrative staff 1.5 Fencing 11 I Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the 0—Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and _ ❑NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and Performance Standard 1.6 ✓ r Functional Area Performance Standard 'Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review A Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g. pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. e Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ❑ open elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. e If noise insulation is required, install double -glazing at the ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. 6 Other strategy used: NO FENCING ALONG STREETS AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDINGS. CHAIN LINK USED Landscaping Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and allows intruders to hide. ®/ Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. ■ Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in e height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and along pedestrian pathways. r ee Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. E Evaluation for Agency Use Only _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Other strategy used: 1.7 Exterior Lighting _ ❑conf Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. _ ❑Revise (Refer to FWRC 19.115.050(7)(a) for specific lighting _ ❑NA requirements.) Comments: Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist i Section and I ✓ I Functional Area i Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy 0 Applicable during Site Plan Review A Applicable during Building Permit Review Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a ®/ coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. ■ For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that lighting ❑ supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal - resistant. e ❑ Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access/egress routes, and signage is well lit. e © In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and ❑ mature form, as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light. e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid ❑ giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e Select and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. 0 ❑ Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people ❑ (retirement homes, congregate care facilities, senior and/ or community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in public/common areas. e Other strategy used: n 1.8 Mix of Uses ucon In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural _ ❑Revise surveillance, while protecting privacy. _ ❑NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy a Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Where allowed by city code, locate shops and businesses on lower floors and residences on upper floors. In this way, NA ❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the residences can be observed by the businesses during business hours. M NA❑ Include food kiosks, restaurants, etc. within parks and parking structures. ■ Evaluation for Agency Use Only Other strategy: used 1.9 Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors _ ❑Conf When used and permitted by building and fire codes, security _ ❑Revise bars, shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street _ ❑NA and be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Comments: ❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable (see -through). e Other strategy used: Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification IJConf Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to _ ❑Revise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find _ ❑NA the building. Identification signs must conform to FWRC Comments: 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ❑ Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. e Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review In residential uses, each individual unit should be clearly numbered. In multiple building complexes, each building entry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry. In addition, unit numbers should be provided on each level or floor. e ❑ Street numbers should be made of durable materials, preferably reflective or luminous, and unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). e For larger projects, provide location maps (fixed plaque ❑ format) and directional signage at public entry points and along internal public routes of travel. e Other strategy used: El 2.2 Entrances _ ❑Con Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Entrances should be easily recognizable through design 000' features and directional signage. (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ■ le Minimize the number of entry points. ■ Other strategy used: 13 2.3 Landscaping _Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access. ❑_Revise _ ❑NA Comments: ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e Other strategy used: 2.4 Landscaping Location _ ❑Con# Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a _ ❑Revise building or to neighboring buildings. _ ❑NA Comments: Bulletin #022 - January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Vr rl Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures, fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. ■ Other strategy used: 2.5 Security _ ❑Confc Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable during Certificate of Occupancy Inspection). Other strategy used: 2.6 Signage _ ❑Confi Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple _ ❑Revise to understand [Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. _ [INA Exempt Signs]. Comments: ❑ Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graphics for informational signs. e Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and For Surface ❑ drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators, and exits. e Parking Structures In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system. e ❑ Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. e Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used: 9 Section 3.0 Ownership 3.1 Maintenance _ ❑Conft Create a "cared for" image _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWRC 90 19.125.090, in order to give an impression of ownership, care, and security. (Ongoing). Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no NA ❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance. ■ Other strategy used: 3.2 Materials _ ❑Conf Use materials, which reduce the opportunityfor vandalism. _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel ❑ materials, anti -graffiti paints, and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. e ❑ Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWRC 19.125.040(21) regarding the use of vegetative screens. e Common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points, or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 9 k:\1landouts\CPTED Checklist wlldwood Elementary School Critical Area Map AHBL #2180139.50 Date: 01/08/2019 11 50 100 �yq n 1i L—Lj �t��, ; rJ,AN i p _ �.. - ■ Feet Y 0 MFEDEEVREALLO P EaaoYYYY ��' GPIuIEN7 W.,_.,41N... i'ON LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION 6.AN6ARD FORM RECEIVED POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE JAN 10 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WASHINGTON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 719 Second Avenue Seattle 4, Washington hereinafter called the Company, a Washington corporation, for valuable considera- tion, and subject to the conditions and stipulations of this policy, does hereby insure the person or persons named in item 1 of Schedule. A, together with the persons and corporations included in the definition of "the insured" as set forth in the conditions and stipulations, against loss or damage sustained by reason of: 1. Title to the estate, lien or interest defined in items 3 and 4 of Schedule A being vested, at the date hereof, otherwise than as stated in item 2 of Schedule A; or 2. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date here- of, not shown in Schedule B ; or 3. Any defect in the execution of any instrument shown in item 3 of Schedule A, or priority, at the date hereof, over any such instrument, of any lien or en- cumbrance not shown in Schedule B ; provided, however, the Company shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense resulting from the refusal of any person to enter into, or perform, any contract respecting the estate, lien or interest insured. The total liability is limited to the amount shown in Schedule A, exclusive of costs incurred by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims here- under. In witness whereof, WASHINGTON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be authenticated by the facsimile signature of its President, but this policy is not valid unless attested by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary. WASHINGTON By Attest: 'd'HTb,E INSURANCE COMPANY n Assistant Secretary M SCHEDULE A NO. B_696925 AMOUNT $ 27, 000.00 DATE duly 26, 1963 at 8:30 a.m. PREMIUM $ 137.75 1. INSURED Federal Way School District No. 210. 2. TITLE TO THE ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED BY THIS POLICY IS VESTED IN The named insured. 3. ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED Fee simple estate. 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE REAL ESTATE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS POLICY IS ISSUED The northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 4, township 21 north, range 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington. 1. Easement for pole line right of way granted by Edward Maloney and Eline Maloney, to the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, by instrument recorded August 22, 1924; iecorded under auditor's file No. 1908297. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS I. Encroachments or questions of location, boundary and area, which an accurate survey may disclose; public or private easements not disclosed possession, or claiming to be in possession, not disclosed by the public records; material or by the public records; rights or claims of persons in osed by the public records; water rights or matters relating thereto; any labor liens or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not discl service, installation or construction charges for sewer, water or electricity. 2. Exceptions and reservations in United States Patents; right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; limitation by law or governmental regulation with respect to subdivision, use, enjoyment or oc cupancy; defects, Iiens, encumbrances, or other matters created or suffered by the insured; rights or claims based upon instruments or upon facts not disclosed by the public records but of which rights, claims, instruments or facts the insured has knowledge. 3. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. (End of Schedule B) 1. The Company shall have the right to, and will, at its own expense, defend the insured with respect to all demands and legal proceedings founded upon a claim of title, encumbrance or defect which existed or is claimed to have existed prior to the date hereof and is not set forth or excepted herein; reserving, however, the option at any time . of settling the claim or paying the amount of this policy in full. In case any such demand shall be asserted or any such legal proceedings shall be instituted the in- sured shall at once give notice thereof in writing to the Company at its home office and, if the insured is a party to such legal proceedings, secure to the Company, within ten days after service of first process upon the insured, the right to defend such legal proceedings in the name of the insured so far as necessary to protect the insured, and the insured shall render all reasonable assistance in such defense. If such notice shall not be given, or the right to defend secured, as above provided, then all liability of the Company with regard to the subject matter of such demand or legal proceedings, and any expense incident thereto, shall terminate; provided, however, that failure to give such notice shall in no case prejudice the claim of the insured unless the Com- pany shall be actually prejudiced by such failure and then only to the extent of such prejudice. 2. In the event of final judicial determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, under which the estate, lien or interest in- sured is defeated or impaired by reason of any adverse interest, lien or encumbrance not set forth or excepted herein, claim may be made as herein provided. A statement in writing of any loss or damage, for which it is claimed the Company is liable, shall be furnished to the Company at its home office within sixty days after such loss or damage shall have been ascertained. No right of action shall accrue with respect thereto until thirty days after such statement shall have been furnished and no recovery shall be had unless an action shall have been commenced thereon within one year after the expiration of said thirty days. Any rights or defenses of the Company against a named insured shall be equally available against any person or corporation who shall become an insured hereunder as successor of such named insured. 3. The Company may at any time pay this policy in full, whereupon all liability of the Company shall terminate. Fiery pay- ment made by the Company, exclusive of costs incurred by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims hereunder, shall reduce the liability of the Company by the amount paid. The Liability, of the Company shall in no case exceed the actual loss of the insured and costs which the Company is obligated to pay. When. the Company shall have paid a claim here- under it shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies which the insured may have against any person or property with respect to such claim, or would have if this policy had not been issued, and the insured shall transfer all such rights to the Company. If the payment made by the Company does not cover the loss of the insured, such subrogation shall be proportionate. Whenever the Company shall be obligated to pay a claim under the terms of this policy by reason of a defect in the title to a portion of the area described herein, liability shall be limited to the proportion of the face amount of this policy which the value of the defective portion bears to the value of the whole at the time of the discovery of the defect, unless liability is otherwise specifi- cally segregated herein. If this policy insures the lien of a mortgage, and claim is made hereunder, the Company may pay the entire indebtedness and thereupon the insured shall assign to the Company the mortgage and the indebtedness secured thereby, with all instruments evidencing or securing the same, and shall convey to the Company any property acquired in full or partial satisfaction of the indebtedness, and all liability of the Company shall thereupon terminate. If a policy insuring the lien of a mortgage is issued simultaneously with this policy and for simultaneous issue premium as provided in rate schedule, any payment by the Company on said mortgage policy with respect to the real estate described in Schedule A hereof shall reduce pro tanto the liability under this policy. All actions or proceedings against the Company must be based on the provisions of this policy. Any other action or actions or rights of action that the insured may have or may bring against the Company with respect to serv- ices rendered in connection with the issuance of this policy, are merged herein and shall be enforceable only under the terms, condi- tions and limitations of this policy. 4. The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "named insured": the persons and corporations named as insured in Schedule A of this policy; (b) "the insured": such named insured together with (1) each successor in ownership of any in- debtedness secured by any mortgage shown in Item 3 of Schedule A, (2) any owner or successor in ownership of any such indebt- edness who acquires title to the real estate described in Item 4 of Schedule A, or any part thereof, by lawful means in satisfaction of said indebtedness or any part thereof, (3) any governmental agency or instrumentality which insures or guarantees said indebtedness or any part thereof, and (4) any person or corporation deriving an estate or interest in said real estate as an heir or devisee of a named insured or by reason of the dissolution, merger, or consolidation of a corporate named insured; (c) "date hereof": the exact day, hour and minute specified in Schedule A; (d) "public records": records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice with respect to said real estate; (e) "home office": the office of the Company at the address shown herein. Z �� z W wo TJ17 - - ..r w z W Z Z Q z 3 -.W W 0 ,Li Q Z `` LEI �f Q .x r W M Wr . A1\1 _ . kj N LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION 'a.AND A.161i FORM POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE WAS H INGTON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 719 Second Avenue Seattle 4, Washington hereinafter called the Company, a Washington corporation, for valuable considera- tion, and subject. to the conditions and stipulations of this policy, does hereby insure the person or persons named in item 1 of Schedule - A, together with the persons and corporations included in the definition of "the insured" as set forth in the conditions and stipulations, against loss or damage sustained by reason of: 1. Title to the estate, lien or interest defined in items 3 and 4 of Schedule A being vested, at the date hereof, otherwise than as stated in item 2 of Schedule A; or 2. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date here- of, not shown in Schedule B ; or 3. Any defect in the execution of any instrument shown in item 3 of Schedule A, or priority, at the date hereof, over any such instrument, of any lien or en- cumbrance not shown in Schedule B ; provided, however, the Company shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense resulting from the refusal of any person to enter into, or perform, any contract respecting the estate, lien or interest insured. The total liability is limited to the amount shown in Schedule A, exclusive of costs incurred by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims here- under. In witness whereof, TVASHINGTON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused this policy to be authenticated by the facsimile signature of its President, but this policy is not valid unless attested by the Secretary or. an Assistant Secretary. WAS H INGTON By - Attest: TITLE II+TSI7RANCE COMPANY n r Assistant Secretary SCHEDULE A )ATE B July 69626, AMOUNT $ 27, 000.00 1963 at 8:30 a.m. PREMIUM $ 137.75 . INSURED Federal Way School District No. 210. Z. TITLE TO THE ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED BY THIS POLICY IS VESTED IN The named insured. 3. ESTATE, LIEN OR INTEREST INSURED Fee_simple estate. 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE REAL ESTATE WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS POLICY IS ISSUED The northwest.quarter of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section 4, township 21 north, range 4 east, W.M. King County, Washington. , in EEECTS, LIENS, ENCU14iR^ �,y{.., SCHEDULE B SAND OTHER MATTERS AG . T ST G�+iI�CH THE OF.:S NOT INSURE: � _ "� COMPANY 1"ECIAL EXCEPTIONS +i. 1. Easement for pole line right of way granted by Edward Maloney and Eline Maloney, to the Pacific Telephone Telegraph auditorpspfile by instrument recorded August 22, 192 ; mecordedunder No. 1908297. .I s , F f i I i i GENERAL EXCEPTIONS ion, or claiming a e sdisclosed by the public records; material of 1. Encroachmentin possession, not s ar questions of iocatian, boundary and area, which an accurate survey may disclose; public or private easements not diacloaef by the public records; rights or claims of persons in possess public records: water rights or matters relating thereto; ass! labor liens or liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not disclosed by the pu service, installation or construction charges far hewer, wafer .ar electricity. liar b the United States of America in th+ governmental ct to subdivision, �, en3oY ment or oc 2 Exception$, and reservations is United States Patents right of use,regulation control or regulation � hts u claims bused upon instrument exercise of powers over navigation; limitation ter matte or created or suffered 1 byothe insured,S l cupancy; defects, liens, encumbrances, ' s but ❑f which rights, claims, instruments or facts the insured has know! ge• or upon feels not disclosed by the Public record 3. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special asses$ments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. i ~ (End of Schedule B) I°' CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The Company shall have the right tv, and will, at its own expense, defend the insured with respect to all demands and legal proceedings founded upon a claim of title, encumbrance or defect which existed or is claimed to have existed prior to the date hereof and is not set forth or excepted herein; reserving, however, the option at any time of settling the claim or paying the amount of this policy in full. In case any such demand shall be asserted or any such legal proceedings shall be instituted the in- sured shall at once give notice thereof in writing to the Company at its home office and, if the insured is a party to such legal proceedings, secure to the Company, within ten days after service of first process upon the insured, the right to defend such legal proceedings in the name of the insured so far as necessary to protect the insured, and the insured shall render all reasonable assistance in such defense. If such notice shall not be given, or the right to defend secured, as above provided, then all liability of the Company with regard to the subject matter of such demand or legal proceedings, and any expense incident thereto, shall terminate; provided, however, that failure to give such notice shall in no case prejudice the claim of the insured unless the Com- pany shall be actually prejudiced by such failure and then only to the extent of such prejudice. 2. In the event of final judicial determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, under which the estate, lien or interest in- sured is defeated or impaired by reason of any adverse interest, lien or encumbrance not set forth or excepted herein, claim may be made as herein provided. A statement in writing of any loss or damage, for which it is claimed the Company is liable, shall be furnished to the Company at its home office within sixty days after such loss or damage shall have been ascertained. No right of action shall accrue with respect thereto until thirty days after such statement shall have been furnished and no recovery shall be had unless an action shall have been commenced thereon within one year after the expiration of said thirty days. Any rights or defenses of the Company against a named insured shall be equally available against any person or corporation who shall become an insured hereunder as successor of such named insured. 3. The Company may at any time pay this policy in full, whereupon all liability of the Company shall terminate. Every pay- ment made by the Company, exclusive of costs incurred by the Company as an incident to defense or settlement of claims hereunder, shall reduce the liability of the Company by the amount paid. The liability of the Company shall in no case exceed the actual loss of the insured and costs which the Company is obligated to pay. When the Company shall have paid a claim here- under it shall be subrogated to all rights and remedies which the insured may have against any person or property with respect to such claim, or would have if this policy had not been issued, and the insured shall transfer all such rights to the Company. If the payment made by the Company does not cover the loss of the insured, such subrogation shall be proportionate. Whenever the Company shall be obligated to pay a claim under the terms of this policy by reason of a defect in the title to a portion of the area described herein, liability shall be limited to the proportion of the face amount of this policy which the value of the defective portion bears to the value of the whole at the time of the discovery of the defect, unless liability is otherwise specifi- cally segregated herein. If this policy insures the lien of a mortgage, and claim is made hereunder, the Company may pay the entire indebtedness and thereupon the insured shall assign to the Company the mortgage and the indebtedness secured thereby, with all instruments evidencing or securing the same, and shall convey to the Company any property acquired in full or partial satisfaction of the indebtedness, and all liability of the Company shall thereupon terminate. If a policy insuring the lien of a mortgage is issued simultaneously with this policy and for simultaneous issue premium as provided in rate schedule, any payment by the Company on said mortgage policy with respect to the real estate described in Schedule A hereof shall reduce pro tanto the liability under this policy. All actions or proceedings against the Company must be based on the provisions of this policy. Any other action or actions or rights of action that the insured may have or may bring against the Company with respect to serv- ices rendered in connection with the issuance of this policy, are merged herein and shall be enforceable only under the terms, condi- tions and limitations of this policy. 4. The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "named insured": the persons and corporations named as insured in Schedule A of this policy; (b) "the insured": such named insured together with (1) each successor in ownership of any in- debtedness secured by any mortgage shown in Item 3 of Schedule A, (2) any owner or successor in ownership of any such indebt- edness who acquires title to the real estate described in Item 4 of Schedule A, or any part thereof, by lawful means in satisfaction of said indebtedness or any part thereof, (3) any governmental agency or instrumentality which insures or guarantees said indebtedness or any part thereof, and (4) any person or corporation deriving an estate or interest in said real estate as an heir or devisee of a named insured or by reason of the dissolution, merger, or consolidation of a corporate named insured; (c) "date hereof": the exact day, hour and minute specified in Schedule A; (d) "public records": records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice with respect to said real estate; (e) "home office": the office of the Company at the address shown herein. W U Z Q D U) z Z .` j 0 Z 0 W Z =.. Z LL ° Q - =4= a W LJ 1_ =�... Q W M Washington Land Title Association 'N' J11INGTON TITLE INSURANCE .OT' ,\ANY Preliminary Commitment Form 719 SECOND AVENUE MUTUAL 2.6600 SEATTLE 4. WASHINGTON PRELIj BINARY CO±���:'IT ]ENT FOR TITLE INSUot "ANCE No. B-696925 Unit 10 To: Harry Fisher (Re: Fisher --Federal Way School District #210 ) Date:December 11, 1962 at 8:00 a.m. Amount Premium 4%' Tax ( ) Owner's standard coverage ( Purchaser's standard coverage $35, 000.00 $166.50 $6.66 ( ) Mortgagee's standard coverage ( ) Mortgagee's ATA coverage WASHINGTON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY agrees to issue on request and on recording of any appropriate documents, its policy or policies as applied for, with coverage as indicated, based on this preliminary commitment that title to the property described herein is vested on the date shown above in HARRY S. FISHER and LILLIAN N. FISHER, his wife. subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. This report and commitment shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the coverage ipecifed herein. ! iJ � � f•�Vt,� DESCRIPTION: By — The west half of the southwest guesser of the southeast quarter of section 4, township 21 nortIA, range 4 east, W.M., in King County, Washington, EXCEPT the soi-.th half of the 'crest ,ha-21 , y ; ;?aT t:tv► es,' 90 feet of the south 290 feet, EXCEPT the west 90 feet of the east 180 feet of the south 300 feet and EXCEPT the.4-sout"trl`-30 .feet for road EXCEPTIONS: 1. Lien of real estate excise sales taxoupon any sale of said premises, if unpaid. 2. Easement for pole line right of way granted by Edward Maloney and Eline Maloney by instrument dated July 23, 1924, recorded under auditor's file No. 1908297. NOTE: General taxes for 1962 in the sum of $280.91 on said premises, are paid in full. YBC:pc NOTE. Investigation thould be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance, or construction charger for sewer, water or electricity. Federal Way Public Schools FEDERAL WAY Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 81' Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 NOTICE OF CONSULTATION SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Proposal: Demolish existing 50,382 SF building and replace with new 60,322 SF elementary school and related site improvements. Applicant: Federal Way Public Schools, Educational Service Center, 33330 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 Project Location: 2405 S 300th Street, Federal Way WA 98003 APN: 042104-9167 Date of Complete Application: September 27, 2018 Date Notice of A is Comments Due: Octa oruigicision Msued: Novemoer 7, Lead Agency: Federal Way Public coo s Staff Contact: Ray Vefik, Capital Projects Manager (253) 945-5930, rvefikcVwPs.org Requested Decision and Other Permits Included with this Application: The issuance of a Threshold Determination pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) rules (WAC 197-11); additional use permits and construction permits will be issued by the City of Federal Way, Washington, in conjunction with their review of construction plans and supporting documentation pursuant to the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC). Environmental Documents: SEPA Environmental Checklist, prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. (09/25/18), Geotechnical Engineering Report, prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (6/6/2018), Critical Areas Analysis, prepared by Environmental Service Associates (Pending), Transportation Impact Analysis, prepared by Transportation Engineering NorthWest (7/3/2018), Acoustical Analysis, prepared by Stantec Consultants (09/20/18), Regulated Materials Analysis, prepared by PBS Engineering & Environmental Services (Pending), Site Lighting/Photometric Analysis (Pending) and Arborist Report (Pending). Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: FWRC Title 14, "Environmental Policy"; Title 16, "Surface Water Management," and Title 19, "Zoning and Development Code." Consistency with Applicable Plans and Regulations: 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM), with City of Federal Way Addendum, the Federal Way Public Works Development Standards Manual, Federal Way Community Design Guidelines and Lakehaven Water and Sewer District Development Standards. ' Public Comment and Appeals: The official project file is available for PAPP14 Educational Service Center (see below). Any person may submit written comments for considerate y the hearin examiner no ctober 23, 2018. Only the applicant, persons who submit written comments, and/or persoMMM spentically reque original ion may appeal the Final Notice of Decision. Any person may submit written comments and appear before the hearing examiner to give verbal comments, at a public hearing, to be scheduled and advertised at a later date (if required). Availability of File and Environmental Documents: The official project file containing the SEPA checklist and related plans and documents is available for public review during normal business hours at the following locations: FWPS Website, www.fwps.org/SEPA FWPS Educational Service Center, 33330 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003, (253) 945-2000 FWPS Support Service Center,1211 S 332nd Street, Federal Way, WA 98003, (253) 945-5930 (FWPS Record Depository Federal Way 320th Public Library, 848 South 320th Street, Federal Way, WA (253) 839-0257 ... Open: 10:00 AM, M-SA Published in the Federal Way Mirror. Friday, September 28, 2018 Published in the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce: Monday, October 1, 2018 ,j—� FEDERAL WAY `'�l PUBLIC SCHOOLS Department of Each Sc4a:v Avoice Ad'Cam ASRIGKr future MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS Hello Federal Way Public Schools Families and Members of the Community: Federal Way Public Schools is improving school facilities throughout the district, thanks to voter approval of the phase two bond in November 2017. Wildwood Elementary School is one of eight schools to be rebuilt as part of this bond, and our team is currently working hard to design the new school. The next step in the process is to complete an environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The attached Notice of Consultation provides an invitation to participate in this process by reviewing project materials and providing comments on the proposal. The documents will be available beginning Oct. 1, 2018, and the deadline to submit comments is Oct. 23, 2018. After the comment period, all comments will be reviewed, then a formal environmental determination for the project will be issued and made available to the public. To stay informed about the progression of the Wildwood Elementary School project and other construction projects in Federal Way Public Schools, visit www.fwps.ora/band or sign up for our e-newsletter by emailing comments fw s.or . Sincerely, OLL 6avia...'n Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance & Operations Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT Future. 1211 South 332^d St, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 www.fwps.org. M&O - p.253.945.5930 I f.253.945.59591 TRANS - p.253.945.5950 I f.253.945.5999 RECEIVED JAN 10 2019 CITY OF -�� CITY 11111 DI Rail. WAY Federal WaYMMUN I T Y DEVELOPMENT MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 81h Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.ci offederalwa .cam APPLICATION NO(S) 0! 7,3 r a P Date Project Name Wildwood Elements School Property Address/Location 2405 South 300th Street / Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel Number(s) 0421049167 pHO'-1C( Demolish & Replace an existing Elementary School with a newly constructed Elementary School. Project Description PT.F.ASF. PRTNT Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment' Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process IT (Site Plan Review) X Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Required Information in§l Family-1 Unit/7,200 SF Zoning Designation ing a Fam1 ❑w Density omprehenslve Ian Designation $2,532,300 Value of Existing Improvements $25,957,5 00 Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Groups E. B, A-3 Occupancy Type Type II-B ,Construction Type Applicant Name: Federal Way Public Schools Address:1211 South 332nd Street City/State:Federal Way / WA Zip: 98003 Phone:253-945-5930 Fax:253-945-5959 E gn11ien Signature f ps.org - 1� Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: CBRE I Heery Address: 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700 City/State: Seattle / WA Zip: 98101 Phone:206-835-0473 Fax: None Email: rvefikAwps.org. Owner Name: Federal Way Public Schools Address: 1211 South 332nd Street City/State: Federal Way / WA Zip:98003 Phone:253-945-5930 Fax:253-945-5959 Email: mberizlT@fwf)s.org Signat�- r � Bulletin #003 —January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\Master Land Use Application 1i engineeringopc April 1, 2019 EJ Walsh, P.E. Director of Public Works 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 April I, 2019 Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Deviation Request Federal Way Public Schools Page Re: Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Deviation Request Federal Way Public Schools Dear Mr. Walsh: This letter is an official written request for a deviation from the Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Under the "Required Storm Water Control and Treatment" section, the Commercial Land Use Checklist states: "Ifproperty is outside City center, facilities are above -ground" In addition, all three City of Federal Way Pre -application Conference Summaries comment under the Public Works Development Services Division: "Detention and water quality facilities must be above ground (i. e. open pond). Underground facilities are allowed only with approval from the City of Federal Way Public Works Department" This specific comment in the pre -application conference summary cannot be found in the City of Federal Way Municipal Code. To clarify this pre -application requirement, LPD reached out to Cole Elliot to verify if the project needed a variance through Public Works. He stated: I have looked high and low for a section in the Federal Way Revised. Coed (FWRC), Development Standards, Comprehensive Plan and the City Core Section which would require all storm retention/detention systems outside of City Core to be above ground. I found It listed on our Pre - Application Conference summary and on the Development Services review checklist but I did not find that requirement in code. I was able to locate one maintenance policy regarding open ponds but that applies to systems the City will own and maintain. Therefore so long as it is clear in your design proposal that the proposed storm vaults will be owned and maintained bythe School District it appears that you do not need to apply for a variance thru the Public Works Department. Cole Elliott, PE Development Services Manager trrr 9+ ti Federal Way 33325 81h Ave South Federal Way, WA 98003 Office: (253) 835-2730 Cell: (253) 293-4152 www.CityafFederalWay.com 0�_ RESUBMITTED APR 0 4 2019 CfTy OF UNITY D��aPMEW engineerin1�11 April I, 2019 Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Deviation Request Federal Way Public Schools Page 2 However, upon receiving preliminary Land Use Comments, the City is requiring an official written request. We are proposing the following: 1. Underground detention facilities for Mirror Lake for on -site and off -site improvements 2. Underground detention facilities for Lake Grove for on -site and off -site improvements 3. Underground detention facilities for Wildwood for on -site improvements The improvements as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or City as a whole." An above ground detention facility such as an open pond is not appropriate for a school setting. It would increase the risk of student safety. In the school district opinion, the fencing requirements for an above ground facility will not guarantee prevention of student access and will require additional supervision. In addition, above ground detention facilities take away outdoor program space for students. The Outdoor learning areas are crucial to the school district's agenda to provide a diversified learning environment for the community's youth. In summary, the City's acceptance of the deviation request above, the usage of underground detention facilities would be better suited to function safely and be advantageous for a school environment and ultimately the local community. Thank you for your consideration and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, r ■ ` 3e fer L. graves, P.E. Project Manager I Sr. Civil Engineer I N engineering p c April 1, 2019 EJ Walsh, P.E. Director of Public Works 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 ~ April I, 2019 Commercial Land Ua_ ..eview Checklist Deviation Request Federal Way Public Schools Page I Be. Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Deviation Request Federal Way Public Schools Dear Mr. Walsh: RESUBMITTED APR Q 4 2019 Cfi 4' OF FEDERAL WAY COAL MUN1TY DEVELCy *bqT This letter is an official written request for a deviation from the Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Under the "Required Storm Water Control and Treatment" section, the Commercial Land Use Checklist states: "Ifproperty is outside City center, facilities are above -ground" In addition, all three City of Federal Way Pre -application Conference Summaries comment under the Public Works Development Services Division: "Detention and water quality facilities must be above ground (i. e. open pond). Underground facilities are allowed only with approval from the City of Federal Way Public Works Department" This specific comment in the pre -application conference summary cannot be found in the City of Federal Way Municipal Code. To clarify this pre -application requirement, LPD reached out to Cole Elliot to verify if the project needed a variance through Public Works. He stated: I have looked high and low for a section in the Federal Way Revised Coed (FW RC), Development Standards, Comprehensive Plan and the City Core Section which would require all storm retention/detention systems outside of City Core to be above ground. I found It listed on our Pre - Application Conference summary and on the Development Services review checklist but I did not find that requirement in code. I was able to locate one maintenance policy regarding open ponds but that applies to systems the City will ovenn and maintain. Therefore so long as it is clear in your design proposal that the proposed storm vaults will be owned and maintained by the School District it appears that you do not need to apply for a variance thru the Public Works Department. Cole Elliof#, PE Development Services Manager Eno+ Federal Way 33325 S"' Ave South Federal Way, WA 98003 Office: (253) 835-2730 Cell: (253) 293--4152 wvwv.CitypfFederalWay, corn engineering p April I, 2019 Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Deviation Request Federal Way Public Schools Page 2 However, upon receiving preliminary Land Use Comments, the City is requiring an official written request. We we .prclposing the following: 1. Underground detention facilities for Mirror Lake for on -site and off site improvements 2. Underground detention facilities for Lake Grove for on -site and off -site improvements 3. Underground detention facilities for Wildwood for on -site improvements The improvements as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or City as a whole." An above ground detention facility such as an open pond is not appropriate for a school setting. It would increase the risk of student safety. In the school district opinion, the fencing requirements for an above ground facility will not guarantee prevention of student access and will require additional supervision. In addition, above ground detention facilities take away outdoor program space for students. The Outdoor learning areas are crucial to the school district's agenda to provide a diversified learning environment for the community's youth. In summary, the City's acceptance of the deviation request above, the usage of underground detention facilities would be better suited to function safely and be advantageous for a school environment and ultimately the local community. Thank you for your consideration and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Je ifeni r�e-raves, P.E. Project Manager I Sr. Civil Engineer t M� WASH IN 6 T 0 N STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY May 2014 GENERAL USE LEVEL DESIGNATION FOR BASIC (TSS), ENHANCED, & PHOSPHORUS TREATMENT For Washington State Department of Transportation's Media Filter Drain (MFD) Ecolo 's Decision: Based on the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) application submissions, Ecology hereby issues the following use level designations for the WSDOT Media Filter Drain (MFD): 1. A General Use Level Designation for Basic (TSS) Treatment. 2. A General Use Level Designation for Enhanced Treatment. 3. A General Use Level Designation for Phosphorus Treatment*. 4. These General Use Level Designations have no expiration date but may be revoked or amended by Ecology, and are subject to the conditions specified below. (*Alternative configurations with compost blanket do not have a General Use Level Designation for Phosphorus Treatment) Ecology's Conditions of Use: Design, install, and maintain media Filter Drains (Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3) to comply with these conditions: 1. Each MFD shall be designed as per Section 5-4.1.3 (RT.07 — Media Filter Drain) of the WSDOT 2014 Highway Runoff Manual (HRM). 2. The MFD Ecology Mix will consist of materials identified in RT.07 of the WSDOT 2014 Highway Runoff Manual. 3. Construct the MFD facility as per RT.07 of the WSDOT 2014 Highway Runoff Manual. 4. Maintain the MFD facility per the maintenance standards for media filter drains in the WSDOT 2014 HRM. 5. Follow any post publication updates to the HRM. You can find updates at the WSDOT HRM website: Itttp:ll►►►►►v.►rs[iot.►va.ao►IEttvii-otttnetttlWater ttalitylRittioff/tii-,hN►•ayRun[fffNIaiival. 6. WSDOT shall make readily available those documents deemed public information and make this information available upon request and in a timely manner. 7. Discharges from the MFD shall not cause or contribute to water quality standards violations in receiving waters. Approved Alternate Conti orations: MFD (Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3) with 3-inch Medium Compost Blanket and Grass 1. The MFD with 3-inch medium compost blanket and grass over the grass strip and media mix zone provides additional flexibility to the stormwater best management practice (BMP). You can reduce noxious weeds and unwanted vegetation by placing a compost blanket and grass over the media mix zone. 2. The compost used for the 3-inch compost blanket will conform to WSDOT Standard Specification 9-14.4(8) for medium compost. 3. The MFD with 3-inch medium compost blanket and grass configuration does not have a General Use Level Designation for Phosphorous Treatment. 4. The MFD (Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3) shall be constructed without the 3-inch medium compost blanket and grass when discharging in phosphorous -sensitive areas or phosphorous total maximum daily load (TMDL) areas. MFD end -of -pipe configuration (Type 4 and Type 5) with 3-inch Medium Compost Blanket and Grass 1. The MFD end -of -pipe configuration (Type 4 and Type 5) shall be designed, constructed, maintained, and consist of the materials as per Section 5-4.1.3 (RT.07 — Media Filter Drain) of the WSDOT 2014 Highway Runoff Manual (BERM) 2. The MFD Type 4 and Type 5 have the same compost blanket and grass requirements and use level designations as the MFD Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3, shown above. 3. The MFD Type 4 and Type 5 do not have a General Use Level Designation for Phosphorous Treatment. 4. Construct the MFD Type 4 and Type 5 without the 3-inch medium compost blanket and grass when discharging in phosphorous -sensitive areas or phosphorous total maximum daily load (TMDL) areas. MFD end of pipe configuration (Type 6 and Type 7), downstream of a flow control BMP, with 3-inch Medium Compost Blanket and Grass 1. The MFD end -of -pipe configuration (Type 6 and Type 7), downstream of a flow control BMP shall be designed, constructed, maintained, and consist of the materials as per Section 54.1.3 (RT.07 — Media Filter Drain) of the WSDOT 2014 Highway Runoff Manual (HRM) 2. Construct the MFD Type 6 and Type7 with the 3-inch medium compost blanket and grass and shall have the same compost blanket and grass requirements and use level designations as the MFD Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3, shown above. 3. The MFD Type 6 and Type 7 do not have a General Use Level Designation for Phosphorous Treatment. 4. Do not construct the MFD Type 6 and Type 7 in phosphorous -sensitive areas or phosphorous total maximum daily load (TMDL) areas. Applicant: Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Applicant's Address: Design Office PO Box 47329 Olympia, WA 98504-7329 Application Documents: • Technology Evaluation and Engineering Report: WSDOT Media Filter Drain; Prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation (Herrera Environmental Consultants, July 2006) • Technical Evaluation Report.for the Media Filter Drain BMP Option: Downstream of Detention BMPs: Prepared by the WSDOT I-405 Corridor Program, May 2013 Applicant's Use Level Request: General Use Level Designation for Basic, Enhanced, and Phosphorus Treatment in accordance with Table 2 of Ecology's 2011 Technical Guidance Manual for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies Technology Assessment Protocol — Ecology (TAPE). For the alternative configuration of the MFD with 3-inch medium compost blanket and grass, General Use Level Designation for Basic and Enhanced Treatment in accordance with Table 2 of Ecology's 2011 Technical Guidance Manual for Evaluating Emerging Stormwater Treatment Technologies Technology Assessment Protocol — Ecology (TAPE). Applicant's Performance Claims: The Media Filter Drain removes suspended solids, phosphorus*, and metals from highway runoff through physical straining, ion exchange, carbonate precipitation, and biofiltration. WSDOT expects the combination of treatment processes to achieve Ecology's treatment goals for basic, enhanced, and phosphorus* treatment. (*Alternative configurations with compost blanket do not remove phosphorus.) Ecology's Recommendation: Ecology finds: Ecology expects the Media Filter Drain, when sized according to WSDOT RT.07, to provide effective stormwater treatment achieving Ecology's basic, enhanced, and phosphorus performance goals as demonstrated by field-testing performed in accordance with the TAPE protocol; and Ecology deems the Media Filter Drain satisfactory with respect to factors other than treatment performance. Findings of Fact: 1. WSDOT conducted water quality monitoring at the Media Filter Drain test site over a five- year period from 2001 to 2005. 2. WSDOT collected 25 sample events in three phases. 3. For the 12 storms with influent TSS concentrations less than 100 mg/L, the median influent was 59 mg/L and the median effluent was 3.9 mg/L. For the 13 storms with influent concentrations greater than 100 mg/L, the median percent removal was 96.0%. 4. For all storm events, the median percent removal of total phosphorus was 85.7% with a median influent of 0.234 mg/L 5. For all storm events, the median percent removal of dissolved zinc was 80.8% with a median influent of 120 jig/L. 6. For all storm events, the median percent removal of dissolved copper was 40.8% with a median influent of 16 µg/L. 7. WSDOT performed a water budget analysis on the Media Filter Drain to determine if losses were occurring within the system due to infiltration, bypass, and/or evaporation. The percentage of influent accounted for in the effluent ranged from zero to 120 percent with a median of 38 percent. Bypassing the system did not likely cause water loss values because WSDOT only observed bypass on one occasion. Technology Description: The Media Filter Drain is a flow -through water quality treatment device developed for use where available right-of-way is limited and longitudinal gradients are less than 5%. The Media Filter Drain, which can be sited on both highway side slopes and medians, uses infiltration through a pervious, alkalinity -generating media, called the Media Filter Drain Mix, that was designed to remove suspended solids and soluble metals from highway runoff through physical straining, ion exchange, carbonate precipitation, and biofiltration. For illustrations, design specifications and maintenance criteria contact WSDOT. Remaining Issues or Concerns about the MFD Technology: 1. Maintenance and replacement. How do pollutant removal efficiency and hydraulic capacity decrease over time, and at what point is maintenance or replacement required? WSDOT can accomplish this by periodic water quality testing at the SR 167 test site. 2. If possible, WSDOT should test a different MFD facility in the future. They should select the location to verify slope or soil -related siting limitations. The testing should carefully monitor water balance. Contact Information: Applicant: Mark Maurer Highway Runoff Program Manager (360) 705-7260 maurerm wsdot.wa. ov Applicant's Website: liti )://www.wsdot.wa. ov/Environment/Water uali /default.htm Highway Runoff Manual Website: Iitct�-.i,,N,N,ww.wsdot.wa. ov/Environment/Water ualil IRutiof`f/Hi hwa RunoffManual.htm Ecology web link: htt://www.ec .wa. ovl ro rams/w /stormwater/newtech/technolo ies.html Ecology: Douglas C. Howie, P.E. Department of Ecology Water Quality Program, (360) 407-6444, do ugl as. h o w i e&ec y. wa. goy Revision Histo Date Revision April 2007 Original Draft use -level -designation document February 2010 Revised Ecology Contact Information January 2013 Modified Design Storm Description, added Revision Table, Revised format to meet Ecology Standards February 2013 Added MFD Alternative Configuration March 2014 Updated HRM references to 2014, added MFD Type designations 1-7, and added descriptions for alternative configurations MFD Type 4, Type 5, Type 6, and Type 7. s y. ♦ .__ `i-�"c.,=.''1� �� ,_•AV f `. irk F� .y i� .~ •may.-.. _ . "fir_ - s.7� - . �+ _ ~{ .� h ,r a r ; r •� - !' Y •' ��•. '� ' ` .r � - i"'it �� -`+ .r � - ri F 3. �r S� �'_ :-- . �► f . �;, 't i} • �l �, �' ��s{ �" .::Y''"'"'� - _ �� fir '�� ...y,. *•'� `� � �. ,� ire � �4r+ �'f _ AL lip € �[- - ------------ tis -..t' _ it er ..�,,. .• lra •J .y � .s .. je FAIM 74 ■ / r `�4 . -4 � • �• .. +�? ,. r ,r � is if:. ' - 4� � + w - �- ,. dA�: ' _ � � � •� m - • �� ear i �, Tdy ' • ~'�' ::. .,' ��. Y �; t - .p .� tom., ! �- �:.- .v-_.Y�.•' ' _ � ��. IWO . A .�3 -� der ���.• t. r +r ♦ �Y ,dA integrus Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools Community Design Guidelines Narrative Cl�"� OF rFDC`�-W-Lon��w Narrative Summa?,PUit a� a Design Guidelines (FWRC 19.115) The new Wildwood Elementary School utilizes several design strategies to address the intent of the community design guidelines and create a building that incorporates a combination of facade treatments and material modulation to organize and articulate building bulk and scale, add architectural interest, and appeal at a pedestrian scale from adjacent neighbors and streets. The building creates the perception of depth and develops a system of material and color modulation to respond to the site and promote the goals of Federal Way Public Schools to create a safe, secure, and supervisable school campus by using the building as a buffer to street traffic on S 3001h Street and creating a welcoming and attractive entrance to the site. (19.115,050) Site design strategies achieve the general criteria established by incorporating pedestrian areas that create a safe and easily supervised entry plaza with fixed seating, clear line of site from ground level windows, and play areas that are clearly defined and secured with perimeter fencing. The organization of the building on the site directs activities to identified areas and creates clear site lines around the perimeter to discourage crime and unsafe activities. Landscaping and site elements have been designed to be well defined and easily maintained to create a project that will be well cared for by Federal Way Public Schools maintenance staff and be inviting to the community it serves. Surface parking meets the requirements of 19.125 by utilizing type IV landscaping and meet the requirements of 19.125.070 for interior lot landscaping, landscape islands, permanent curbing, screening, vehicle overhangs, and irrigation; submitted landscape and civil drawings show exact locations and dimensions. Parking and drop-off areas have looped access and driveways have been located to be clearly visible from S 3001h Street while maintaining a secure and safe route to school for pedestrians. The primary entrance to the school is oriented to S 3001h Street. The site has two entrances of off S 3001h Street, one for parent drop-off and one for bus -drop off. Both drop-offs unload onto a pedestrian plaza outside the main entrance and is easily supervised from the administration offices at the front of the building. Large windows at the ground level and second level also enhance supervision and safety at the entry. Landscaping is used between the building and the pedestrian plaza and sidewalks to soften the building and create an attractive and inviting arrival experience to the school. Sidewalks are used to connect the pedestrians arriving from the adjacent neighborhoods and connect all areas of the site. Bicycle racks are located near the building entry for easy accessibility and supervision. The service yard is located to the east of the building and houses trash, recycling, transformer, and generator. The Service yard is accessed via the east parking lot and meets the requirements of 19.125.150_and 19.125,040 by providing a screened enclosure and landscape screening along with roof protection -above the trash and recycling area. Site lighting is provided at parking and drop-off areas. Site lighting does note spill onto adjacent properties; a site lighting plan has been submitted to show proposed locations and meet the requirements of 19.105.030. (19.115.060) The new Wildwood Elementary School utilizes existing grades and minimizes impacts to the existing topography. The finish floor elevation matches the finish floor elevation of the existing school. The building incorporates type III landscaping buffer around the site and type IV around the building. The main fapade off of S 300th Street incorporates a canopy at the main entrance from the pedestrian plaza at the drop-off areas. The building uses material transitions, window shadow box articulation, and texture to breakdown the building massing and scale. The west facade uses the strategy of creating the classical architectural order of developing a base, middle, and top using material variation, texture and color. The base is a concrete masonry veneer that grounds the building to the site. The masonry base is very durable and creates a sense of permanence that is appropriate for a school building. The middle uses color and texture variation of durable cement board panels and planks to create the perception of depth and material modulation to the facade while creating a highly supervisable building perimeter to ensure student safety before, during, and after school. The supervision of this area of the site and building is a key element in determining overall building organization and site strategies to reinforce safety concerns along the west facade. The 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 - Seattle, WA 98104 - 206.628.3137 FAX 206-628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane integs ARCHITECTURE Statement of Architectural Design Intent Wildwood Elementary School Page 2 facade is articulated by color accents to breakdown the building scale and uses metal trim transitions at material changes and around large window openings to provide the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction required daylighting into the classrooms. The large windows create a rhythm that relates to the material transitions and strengthens the facade modulation concepts around the building. The windows are organized within the facade by the material modulation and articulated by a metal shadow box and metal trim. The top of the building uses the articulation of stepped parapet heights and copings to reinforce the rhythm of the material transitions, window arrangement, and color modulation. The north facade along S 300m Street continues the strategy of creating a base, middle, and top by utilizing the masonry base and color and texture variation of the cement board panels and planks. The articulation of materials, colors, large storefront windows, an entry canopy, landscape screening, building recesses, and a large pedestrian plaza creates a clear and distinguished main entry and arrival point for students, parents, teachers, and community members when entering the site from either the parent drop-off entry or the bus drop-off entry. (19.115.070) The building is oriented towards S 300th Street and incorporates the use of a pedestrian plaza at the parent and bus drop-off areas. The plaza is directly adjacent to the main building entry is protected by a canopy at the entrance. Large ground level windows and directly adjacent administration offices allow for strong site lines and an easily supervised arrival of scholars and community members. Landscaping is utilized between the plaza and building to enhance the arrival experience and does not impede line of site supervision around the building. (19,115.090) Unobstructed supervision of the site and building is a key element in determining overall building organization and site strategies to reinforce safety concerns along the west and north facade. To create strong site lines and to discourage unsupervised areas where there is a greater risk of crime and undesirable activities the west and north facades do not structurally modulate. The building uses material transitions, color, and texture of masonry, durable cement board panels, and plank to create the perception of depth and material modulation to the facade while creating a highly supervisable building perimeter. The facade modulation is reinforced by utilizing accent trim around windows, trim at material transitions, and organizing scupper boxes and downspouts with regularity within the modulation of materials. The roof of the building uses the articulation of stepped parapet heights and copings to reinforce the rhythm of the material transitions, window arrangement, and color modulation. Alternative methods to organize the building and facade treatments under 19.115.090.5 incorporate a majority of architectural elements from 19.115.060.3.b, such as, pedestrian plaza, entry canopy, and building articulation of large windows, trim to create shadow lines and perceived depth, articulated parapet, and materials variations of masonry and cement board panels and planks. The site implements CPTED design principals to create natural surveillance and access control around the building and to all areas of the site. A completed CPTED checklist has been submitted for the project. The building form and site organization work together to create a project that creates strong site lines, a secure perimeter to keep students and teachers safe, and minimize opportunities for undesirable activity, while creating a building that incorporates a combination of facade treatments and material modulation to articulate massing and scale, add architectural interest, and appeal at a pedestrian scale from adjacent neighbors and streets. 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 • 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane n�tegrus ARCA+recruRE NVlildwood Elementary School Federal Way Pubic Schools Architectural Design Intent Statement of Architectural Design Intent Pro'ect Descri tlon The purpose of the project is to replace the existing Wildwood Elementary School for Federal Way Public Schools as part of the bond measure passed by voters in November 2017. The guiding principles developed by the Facilities Planning Committee serve as benchmarks for these projects. The guiding principles are advance strategic goals, learner centered, equity of opportunity, personalized environments, sustainability, safety, community connections, aesthetics, and tight size for growing communities. Wildwood Elementary School is located on the existing 9.38-acre site at 2405 South 3001h Street in Federal Way, Washington. While the site itself is relatively flat or gently sloping, the east, south, and west sides of the site are bordered by dense trees sloping way from the school property. The site is served by South 30V, Street, a single street running east -west along the north edge of the property. The school is surrounded by single family residential development with Wildwood Park immediately to the west. Steel Lake is one block away to the south. The school property is zoned residential single family (RS-7.2), with schools being a permitted use. The existing school building occupies the northern half of the site and stretches east to west. The existing Wildwood Elementary School currently serves approximately 600 scholars from pre -kindergarten through 5th grade. The existing school was originally built in 1967 and opened in 1968 with various additions and modernizations over the years. The school was last remodeled in 1991. The existing facility is comprised of a single - story building with classrooms arranged along a double loaded corridor and four portable classroom buildings. Given the very limited site access and limited area to build a new school while the existing school is occupied, the School District has decided that the school will be housed off site during construction. Site Organization The automobile drive for parent and visitor traffic at Wildwood Elementary School is located off South 3001h Street at the northwest corner of the site utilizing an existing curb cut aligned with 241h Place South. This drop-off loop is developed to accommodate a long on -site queuing area. The bus and service drive is also off South 3001h Street at the northeast corner of the site utilizing the existing curb cut aligned with 26th Ave South. Parking is distributed between a northwest lot, serving visitors and community users, and a northeast lot which will be used primarily by staff. Building service access utilizes the same drive as buses but bypasses the bus loop itself. Fire^lane access to the rear of the school uses the bus and service drive, passing around the southeast corner of the new school building. The fire lane runs along the south and east side of the western classroom wing of the new building, doubling as hard surface play area; a firetruck hammerhead turnaround is located at the south end of the classroom wing. The north -south leg of the " L" is oriented along the west property line to orient many of the classrooms toward the wooded park. The shape of the building works well to define and contain the south facing play area, situating the play area between two walls of the school, the woods to the east and south. Building Organization Working closely with the Federal Way Public Schools Design Review Committee, the orientation and organization of the building was developed as a response to desired program adjacencies and the goal of generating a building that can be used as a buffer between vehicular access to the site and the play areas. Another common priority among the Design Review Committee was the ability to zone the building between the more public community functions, like the gymnasium, multi -purpose and library, and more private academic functions. The Design Review Committee 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 - Seattle, WA 98104 • 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane iMegrus rlUBE Statement of Architectural Design Intent Mirror Lake Elementary School Page 2 expressed a strong desire for shared learning areas'outside of the classrooms to accommodate flexibility in teaching and learning methodologies. The basic organizational scheme of the building is a two-story 1". The two-story school maximizes site area and efficiency. At each school, the ground floor of one leg of the 1" contains the entry, administration, learning resource center (library), music classroom, multi -purpose, gymnasium and building services. The multi -purpose room, gymnasium, and music classroom, which also serves as a stage, are organized for after hour community use. Acoustical, operable walls separate the music classroom from the multi -purpose room and the multi -purpose room from the gymnasium to provide the opportunity to create a large group gathering and performance space. The kitchen and building services are located adjacent to the multi -purpose room and gymnasium. A covered outdoor play structure is attached to the gymnasium. The classrooms are arranged along a central corridor and organized around shared learning, or break out, spaces. Pre-school, kindergarten and first grade are located on the first floor, and grades second through fifth are located on the second floor. Pre-school is located near the main entry to minimize travel for the youngest scholars. Kindergarten through third grade have five classrooms each grouped around the shared learning areas, and fourth and fifth grade have four classrooms each grouped around shared learning areas. Pre-school and kindergarten classrooms have toilet rooms located within their spaces, and larger boys' and girls' toilet rooms are situated centrally between classroom groupings. At the intersection of the two legs of the " L," the student services are centrally located and near the elevator making them convenient and close to most of the classrooms. The student service offices are grouped together to facilitate collaboration and support a "push -in" model of service. Three stairs are evenly distributed through the building to provide convenient locations for vertical circulation and to help alleviate congestion. With both the automobile and bus drop-offs occurring to the north of the building, the administration is centrally located for visibility and security. The main building entry faces north and is located between the administration and the multi -purpose room for convenient access to the cafeteria and gymnasium. An entry canopy directs building users to the front door, while providing cover. The main entry has a vestibule that can be secured to direct all visitors through a door into the reception area before access into the school is permitted. The learning resource center is prominently located on the first floor at the intersection of the I"; it faces the main automobile drop-off and Wildwood Park to the west. The learning resource center, multi -purpose room, and gymnasium are located near the front of the school and positioned to allow extended use of the facility after school hours while keeping the rest of the school closed off. A family connections center is located across the corridor from the main entry. The two-story classroom wing is oriented north to south to take advantage of the Wildwood Park views to the west. Exterior Development The exterior building development reflects the buildings' internal organization and the buildings relationship to its site. The buildings material expression is comprised principally of concrete masonry veneer, cement board panel and plank siding, and window assemblies with an articulated parapet roof design and single ply membrane roofing at low slope roofs. The masonry veneer is used mainly at the first floor to provide a durable and low maintenance material where it is most needed and reflect solidity and permanence. The cement panel and plank siding is mainly located at the upper portion of the building to create contrast and provide weather protection while also being durable and low maintenance. A secondary accent cement panel siding is used to break up the scale and to create rhythm, texture, and unique identity to the school. Attic space for the mechanical systems is located on the roof and is fully enclosed. A canopy with a low slope membrane roof provides cover and expression at the main entry. The massing is based on considerations of the building height limits and the residential context of the neighborhoods where the school is located. The multi -purpose and gym spaces utilize clerestory windows to bring daylight into the 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 • 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane illegrus A s c e r r e c r u A e Statement of Architectural Design Intent Mirror Lake Elementary School Page 3 large volumes. The covered play structure is attached to and integrated into the multi -purpose -gym volume. An enclosure screens the service yard, which is accessed by gates for both vehicles and persons. 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 . 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane FEDERAL WAY ■ PUBLIC SCHOOLS N �d � C•C7C 117-1Dq(512-TA Federal -Way Public Schools_ __ Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8t' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for Applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of Checklist for Non -Project Proposals For non -project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements —that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. Bulletin #050 — October 17. 2016 Page 1 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS A. BACKGROUND Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 811' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Elementary School Replacement, 2405 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, Washington 98003 S 29.9 3. _ i ` n T _ i Wildwood Eiemrenlory 5 MOW S, Scroll C �Y N � N Fsdaral Wcy T E Figure Project Site Vicinity S1wc<nil kp.mDisnf- �'yy �riFlemgnr� fcatr•y 4::r.��Yv�r Figure 1- Vicinity Map - Wildwood Elementary School Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 2 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way Public Schools Educational -Service -Center (E S C) _ _ 33330 8rn Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Federal Way Public Schools (FWPS) Support Services Center, 1211 South 332nd St, Federal Way, WA 98003 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Mike Benzien, Executive Director, Maintenance and Operations Federal Way Public Schools Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd Street, Federal Way WA 98003 (206) 945-5930 (Office) 4. Date checklist prepared: September 25, 2018 5. Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way Public Schools (Lead Agency) City of Federal Way, Washington Contact Person: Robert McNeill, Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72°d Avenue S, Kent, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (Office) bmcnei Il(']&barghausen.com 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The complexity of this project dictates a tentative schedule be established which remains subject to change based on the length of entitlement permitting and plan review processes, weather conditions and/or contractor availability. The current scheduled start date for vacating Wildwood Elementary School is mid/late June 2019, with contractor mobilization scheduled to begin shortly thereafter. Demolition activity is projected to begin in mid -July 2019, with a mid -August 2019 completion targeted — including abatement activity. Actual construction of the replacement school is projected to begin no later than late August 2019, with substantial completion scheduled for mid -October 2020. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Applicant has no further plans for future additions, expansion or other similar activity relative to this development proposal aside from what is described in this proposal. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The Applicant has commissioned several reports addressing environmental issues: • Geotechnical Engineering Report, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) 6/18. Subsurface Investigation Report, PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc., (PBS) 9/21 Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 3 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 801 Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 • Wetlands and Buffer Analysis, Environmental Science Associates (ESA), pending, for submittal during permitting/plan review • Acoustical Analysis, Stantec, 9/18 • Existing Traffic/Parking Conditions, Transportation Engineering North West (TENW) 7/18 • Arborist Report; pending, for submittal during permitting/plan review • Site Lighting/Photometric Analysis; pending, for submittal during permitting/plan review The Applicant is fully committed to developing mitigation measures on any environmental concerns identified by these studies. Figure 2 - Aerial View - Existing Wildwood Elementary School 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. The City of Federal Way will be conducting a Process III, Use Approval review process in accordance with review criteria established in the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), Section 19.65.100(2). SEPA review is typically processed concurrently with Process III applications. As Lead Agency, FWPS will process this SEPA checklist in advance of permitting with the City of Federal Way. The Lakehaven Water and Sewer District will review the Wildwood construction plans as they relate to water and sewer availability, system capacity and infrastructure improvements necessary to adequately serve the new facility. The South King Fire and Rescue District will review plans to assure adequate fire flow and hydrant facilities are available, as well as the installation of sprinkler and alarm systems and assuring adequate fire access is maintained for emergency vehicles. Both of these Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 4 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools - -- - -- EducationaL.Service-Center (ESG)-_-- _- - -- -- -- _--- FEDERAL WAY 33330 P Avenue South PUBIC SCHOOLS Way Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 agencies' approval processes will occur concurrently with the City of Federal Way plan review and construction permitting processes. The Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) will require a Notice of Demolition be submitted along with the results of a professional asbestos survey of the existing facility (and proposed mitigation — if necessary). PSCAA will also require a Notice of Construction be filed. South King Fire and Rescue District (SKFRD) will conduct a thorough review of project plans; including, but not limited to, fire prevention measures, the installation of fire alarm and suppression equipment, the location and capacity of both water lines and hydrants (fire flow), and overall site plan design as related to the designation of fire lanes and emergency vehicle access. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The list below is a preliminary assessment of permitting likely to be required for this project, pending further review. • Master Land Use Application • NPDES General Permit (DOE) • Demolition Permits (PSCAA) Demolition Permits (City) ■ Building and Construction Permits (Federal Way) Retaining Wall Permits (if required) • MEP - Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Permits ■ Sign Permits (if required) ■ Stormwater Covenants • Water 1 Sewer Permits and Developer Extension Agreement (Lakehaven) The following codes will be enforced under the FWRC for this project: • International Building Code (IBC), 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51-50 • International Mechanical Code (IMC), 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51-52 + Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51-56 & WAC 51-57 ■ International Fire Code (IFC), 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51 -54 ■ International Residential Code, 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51-51 • National Electric Code (NEC), 2017 • Accessibility Code (ICCIANSI Al17.1), 2009 • Washington State Energy Code, 2015 WAC 51-11 Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 5 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 P Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Wildwood Elementary School is located on the existing 9.38-acre site at 2405 South 300th Street in Federal Way, Washington. The site is served by South 300th Street, running east -west along the north edge of the property. The school property is zoned residential single family (RS-7.2), with schools being a permitted use. The school is surrounded by single family residential development, with Wildwood Park immediately to the west. Steel Lake is one block away to the south. The existing school building, portable structures and associated parking areas sit within the northern portion of the overall school property while playfields occupy the entire southern portion of the site. Vehicular access to and from the site is currently via two driveways off of South 300th Street, which is located directly north of the school property. Circulation through the site is via a one-way drive aisle, which provides access to existing parking areas. The westernmost vehicular access point provides ingress to the site and the easternmost driveway serves as the egress point from the site. :7 tir+ Figure 3 - Proposed Site Plan - New Wildwood Elementary School The existing Wildwood Elementary School currently serves approximately 550 scholars from pre- kindergarten through 5th grade. The existing building was originally constructed in 1967 and opened for students in 1968; experiencing various additions and modernizations over the years with the last remodel project occurring in 1991. The existing facility is comprised of a single -story building with classrooms arranged along a double loaded corridor (46,798 SF), along with four portable classroom buildings (3,584 SF). Given the limited site access and available area to build a new school while the existing school is occupied, FWPS decided the school will be housed off site during construction. At this time, a specific location has not yet been determined. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 6 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools - Educational Service Center (ESQ - 33330 8"' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located at 2405 South 3001" Street in Federal Way, Washington, and is illustrated on the included vicinity map. An abbreviated legal description, parcel number and lot size are provided below: APN: 042104-9167 Legal: NW'/4 of SW'/4 of SE'/4 Less N 30 Ft for Rd, Section 04, Township 21 N, Range 04 E Lot: 9.38 Acres The project will include the demolition of the existing school facilities and the construction of a new 60,322 SF elementary school campus onsite serving 600 scholars; it is anticipated the final site plan will include the construction of new playfields, paved parking and access drives, landscaping, pedestrian pathways, exterior lighting and other typical improvements outlined in preliminary plans submitted in support of this application. Wildwood Elementary Logistics Plan low Demo Phase llllll� ... Illy Figure 4 - Demo t► ion Logistics - lffiiildwood Elementary School Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 7 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist . FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8tb Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Wildwood Elementary Logistics Plan ` Construction Phase IIH Fit i Figure 5 - Construction Logistics - Wildwood Elementary School B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site: [ ] Flat [ ] Rolling [ ] Hilly [ ] Steep Slopes [ ] Mountainous X ] Other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Topographically, the existing Wildwood school building and playfields sit on a slight plateau with steeper sloping down to lower elevations of approximately 480 feet along the eastern and western perimeters of the school property. The highest elevation points on the site are located north of the existing school building and near the eastern portion of the southern boundary line of the parcel. Elevation levels in these areas Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 8 of 30 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational -Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 r Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 are approximately 505 feet, resulting in a steeply sloped hill in the right-of-way on South 300th Street. The steepest slopes found onsite are approximately forty percent (40%), but are confined to areas along the east, south and west perimeter of the parcel. Minimal sloping between zero and six percent (6%) are found elsewhere onsite. Pending further plan review, the replacement Wildwood facility will take advantage of existing grades, where possible, without the need for deep excavations and/or thick structural fill. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. According to soil data obtained from the USDA Web Soil Survey, soils on the majority of the site consist primarily of Arents, Alderwood material 6 to 15 percent slopes (AmC). To a lesser extent, site soils also consist of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes (AgD), which is predominantly concentrated in a limited area within the site's eastern extremities. Furthermore, based on preliminary findings deduced from geotechnical explorations conducted on the site, subsurface soils are comprised of fill soils underlain by Vashon lodgement till. These identifiable soil types are typically considered poor infiltration receptors. Please refer to our submittal package and the copy of, "Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report," prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Kirkland, Washington, dated June 2018, for a detailed discussion of these issues. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no surface indications of unstable soils and/or a history of soil instability manifesting itself, either onsite or in the immediate vicinity. The Applicant's preliminary geotechnical report identified portions of the slopes along the east, south and west perimeter of the parcel as qualifying for treatment as an Erosion Hazard Area (EHA) under FWRC 19,145.080, and as defined by FWRC 19.05.070. Development may occur on or within 50-feet of this area if the development is not at risk and will not contribute to an increased risk of instability. Current plans call for construction of the new facility in the same general location as the existing building; effectively distancing itself from the designated EHA area. Required buffer reductions will be addressed during review of final construction plans-, if needed Figure 6 - Identified Critical Areas - Wildwood Elementary School Critical Areas: Erosion Hazard Area fti\\V Landslide Hazard Areas Wetlands (1998 City Survey) Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 9 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8a' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Figure 7 - Perspective Rendering (NW Corner) Proposed Wildwood Elementary School e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Preliminary civil engineering plans project grading activity may result in extensive quantities ( CY I cubic yards) of cut and fill; current estimates indicate 19,357 CY cut and 2,582 CY of fill. All existing fill beneath proposed foundations will need to be removed (16,775 CY) and replaced with structural fill or controlled density fill; extending laterally by a distance equal to the depth of overexcavation. Precise amounts of cubic yards cut and the amount and source of fill will be determined later; the Applicant is committed to using approved sources of clean fill materials. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe Temporary erosion is a possibility associated with construction activity. The Applicant's finalized permit plans will include a temporary erosion and sedimentary control (TESC) plan; implemented using the best management practices (BMPs) associated with erosion prevention and control. The TESC system will be designed in accordance with the City of Federal Way erosion control requirements, in addition to, the 2016 KCSWDM and the Department of Ecology Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). TESC facilities will include at a minimum: stabilized construction entrance, silt fencing, catch basin inserts, interceptor swales, sediment ponds or tanks, and other miscellaneous sediment control facilities. The existing pavement will likely be used for stabilized construction access and staging until such time as it needs to be removed for construction of the proposed improvements. Temporary sediment settling tanks will be used for sediment control. The construction documents will Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 10 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools - Educational -Service- Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 333308mAvenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 include the requirements for the contractor to manage the construction site in accordance with BMPs. This will include marking the clearing limits; limiting the site area that is exposed and stabilizing exposed areas with mulch or other approved measures; protecting slopes and managing any water from construction dewatering. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Based on the preliminary civil engineering plans prepared for this submittal, approximately eleven percent (11%) will be building coverage by the new Wildwood Elementary School, with a total of thirty-seven percent (37%) of the site covered by impervious surfaces (asphalt paving, driveways, sidewalks, walkways, etc.). With maximum lot coverage for structures established at seventy-five percent (75%) under the FWRC, this project falls well below the maximum threshold. However, these are preliminary estimates and subject to change as a result of permitting/plan review. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if an Specific measures to reduce/control erosion will be detailed on the TESC plan referred to in (f) above; these measures will likely focus on erosion potential associated with construction activity. Once the project is completed, the chances of significant erosion are virtually nil. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, the project will not produce any significant impacts and/or result in emissions of particulates or noxious odors either during construction or future operations. During construction minimal impacts may be realized as particulates (dust, dirt, etc.) are released into the air on a limited basis. A reliable estimate of quantities cannot be formulated at this time. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None; Not Applicable. The only potential source lies in the emissions from vehicular traffic using the adjacent rights -of -way. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Controlled watering of the ground will reduce particulates emitted during construction; the use of mufflers and spark arresters will help minimize vehicle emissions from construction equipment. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 11 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3. Water a. Surface Water Federal Way public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 Bet Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. As required by FWRC 19.45.080, a critical areas analysis must be prepared if a proposal may falls within 225 feet of a designated critical area. The subject property is within 225 feet of a designated wetland; a mapped stream located within Wildwood Park, immediately west of the Wildwood school facility, has been identified. The closest surface body of water is Steel Lake; located within % mile of the school, south of South 304th Street. Lake Dolloff is located about % mile southwest of the school, on the east side of Interstate 5. The site is located within the Lower Green River drainage basin, which ultimately discharges to the Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No; Not Applicable. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Under the Applicant's proposal, no filling or dredging of designated wetlands is associated with this project. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None; Not Applicable. Under the Applicant's proposal, no surface water withdrawals and/or diversions are associated with this project; surface runoff will be controlled onsite. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is located in Zone X; an area with minimal flood hazard. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None; Not Applicable. Under the Applicant's proposal, no discharge of waste materials to surface waters is associated with this proposal. b. Ground Water 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 12 of 30 k:%HandcuWEnvironrnental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools -- _ EducationaiService -Center (E.SQ -- FEDERAL WAY 33330 8"' Avenue South PtBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Under the Applicant's proposal, no groundwater will be withdrawn, nor is any discharge to groundwater resulting from this project. Excavation related to construction may reveal the existence of perched groundwater deposits in the substrate; requiring removal through a dewatering process (often requiring a separate permit). 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Under the Applicant's proposal, no discharge of waste materials to ground waters is associated with this construction project. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe The site is located within the Lower Puget Sound drainage basin, which ultimately discharges to the Puget Sound. Paved impervious surfaces are the only potential source of stormwater runoff; runoff will be collected through the onsite stormwater system and conveyed to the designated point of discharge. The proposed stormwater strategy and design will not alter the existing downstream drainage patterns or path from the site. Please refer to the civil engineering plans included with this submittal for more detailed information on collection, conveyance and discharge. Per FWRC 19,45.490, FWPS will be required to submit a hazardous materials inventory with building and construction permitting. In addition, with a proposed landscaped area in excess of 10,000 square feet, FWPS will need to prepare an operations and maintenance manual using best management practices (BMPs), per FWRC 19.145.510. The site is also within the Tacoma Smelter Plume detect area and FWPS is required to obtain soil analysis conducted by an independent consultant to detect and quantify the presence of historic arsenic and/or lead contamination. While performing due diligence on this project, a leaking underground storage tank (UST) was located onsite. Indications are it was used for fuel oil storage in the past. The Applicant is committed to full clean uplremediation of the soils onsite as part of the Wildwood demolition process. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Under the Applicant's proposal, the project has been designed to eliminate and/or limit any potential for groundwater contamination. While excessive amounts are highly unlikely, there is a possibility for surface runoff conveying unspent hydrocarbons and/or other surface contaminants from paved surfaces onsite into groundwater. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 13 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 Sm Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, generally describe. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, drainage patterns for other properties in the vicinity will not be affected by this proposal. The Applicant's preliminary drainage plan demonstrates specific improvements designed to monitor drainage patterns and control runoff. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water, and drainage impacts, if any. The stormwater design will be developed in compliance with the 2016 King County Stormwater Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Federal Way, as well as the City's Addendum to the 2016 KCSWDM dated January 8, 2017. The site is located within the Lower Green River drainage basin, which ultimately discharges to the Puget Sound. There are four (4) discharge points from the school site. The majority of the stormwater runoff from the property is collected and conveyed to a catch basin in the northwest section of the site and discharged into the public system in South 300th Street. From there, stormwater in the public system flows north, and then easterly to the Green River; eventually discharging into the Puget Sound. Areas in the northeast portion of the property sheet flow to South 300th Street and then flow east, eventually joining the public system and flowing north and east towards the Green River. Areas in the northwest portion of the property also sheet flow onto South 300th Street, before being conveyed north to join the downstream path of the majority of stormwater runoff from the site. The playfield area of the site sheet flows southeast of the school property. Runoff from this third discharge point follows the same downstream path at 1/4 mile from the site, ultimately outfalling into the Puget Sound. Both the northeast and southeast drainage points of the site will be modeled as bypass in order to not alter the existing drainage patterns and downstream path. Since the existing impervious surface coverage for the site is 36.39%, the project meets the 35% threshold requirement to classify as a "redevelopment." Additionally, water quality treatment is required for all pollution generating impervious surfaces, and the project must also comply with jurisdictional flow control requirements. Soil conditions in the site area are not conducive to infiltration, eliminating options to use bioretention facilities or permeable pavement to mitigate stormwater runoff. With on -site infiltration infeasible, the stormwater management strategy for water quality treatment and flow control will encompass the use of large sand filter systems and detention facilities. The site resides within a City designated Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment area. In order to meet this level of required treatment, three (3) sand filter facilities are proposed for various areas of the site to treat runoff from target pollution generating impervious surfaces such as the parking lots, drive aisles, service areas, and synthetic turf playfield. The site is also located within a designated Conservation Flow Control Area. To address this level of required flow control, two detention facilities are currently proposed for the site. One detention vault will be located underneath the northern ends of the two primary parking areas (33,600 CF). FWPS will be reviewing options for stormwater water quality and flow control as part of the permitting/plan review process. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 14 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Federal Way Public Schools _Educational Service Center (ESCY_ FEDERAL WAY 33330 80 Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Please refer to the preliminary drainage plan prepared as part of the design package as a means of identifying the Applicant's proposal to address/control surface water runoff. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: X ] Deciduous tr ai en, other X ] Evergreen tns fir, cedar, pine other X ] Shrubs X ] Grass ] Pasture ] Crop or grain ] Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ] Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other ] Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ] Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Under the Applicant's proposal, and given the nature of the project, a number of trees and shrubs may be removed to accommodate the project design. Specific details on species, size and location of trees and shrubbery slated for removal will be detailed on preliminary demolition and landscape plans - to be finalized at a later date. Where possible, existing trees and shrubs may be incorporated into the proposed plan. �s 4 , 114 �4F k r. i r - A. !M Figure 8 - Proposed Landscaping Plan - Wildwood Elementary School c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no known threatened or endangered species onsite or in the immediate vicinity. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 15 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8a' Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 9�8003 (253) 945-2000 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The Applicant's plans for landscaping onsite will feature trees and shrubs native to the Pacific Northwest — including a mixture of deciduous and coniferous trees and drought -tolerant plants where appropriate. Please refer to the preliminary landscape plans for a schedule of proposed plantings. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no noxious weeds and/or invasive species on or near the site. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: [ X i��)ais: awks, eagles, heron, other: [ ] Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: [ ] Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site on a regular basis. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The project site is located within the Pacific Flyway; well -documented as a migratory route for numerous species of birds and waterfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None; Not Applicable. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no invasive animal species known to be on or near the project site. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 16 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 6. Energy and Natural Resources Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service -Center (ESCI 33330 80 Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar, wind) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, cooling, manufacturing, storage, etc. Under the Applicant's proposal, either or both electric and/or gas energy will serve to meet the project's anticipated needs. b. Would the project affect potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe the degree of impact. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, this project would not interfere with the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans for this project? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, energy conservation features will be incorporated into the project's design and will be detailed during the permitting phase of the project — including the submittal of required energy worksheets. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, no projected environmental health hazards are or will be associated with this proposal. The risk of fire is not expected to exceed that associated with other similar educational facilities; in fact current design standards will almost certainly provide a major upgrade over existing levels of protection in terms of fire prevention. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there is no known contamination onsite, nor is there any reason to anticipate contamination exists from present and/or past educational uses. The site is located within the Tacoma Smelter Plume detect area and FWPS is required to obtain soil analysis to detect the presence of historic arsenic and/or lead contamination; FWPS has commissioned the appropriate analysis which will be included with this submittal. While performing due diligence on this project, a leaking underground storage tank (UST) was located onsite. Indications are it was used for fuel oil storage in the past. The Applicant is committed to full clean up/remediation of the soils onsite as part of the Wildwood demolition process. The presence of asbestos within_ existing structures will be evaluated_ with an asbestos survey conducted by qualified professionals; required mitigation will be provided in terms of removal from the site. Evidence of the study and findings will be provided to Federal Way as part of Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 17 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8m Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 `253) 945-2000 the demolition permit process and the required Notice of Demolition will be filed with PSCAA, demonstrating compliance with their requirements as well. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no hazardous chemicals or conditions — including transmission pipelines - present onsite or in the immediate vicinity which could affect project development and/or design. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Under the Applicant's proposal, aside from materials used during the educational process, no toxic or hazardous chemicals will be routinely stored, used and/or produced during the project's construction and/or during routine operations as an educational facility. FWPS will be required to submit a hazardous materials inventory during the building and construction permitting process. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, special emergency services will not be required by this project on a regular basis; either during construction or as a matter of routine operation. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: With no environmental health hazards and/or projected impacts identified at this stage of the development process, excluding asbestos mitigation, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Minimal noise impacts may originate from school -related traffic on the adjacent public and/or private rights -of -way; the Applicant does not anticipate any adverse impacts affecting the project. Traffic on public rights -of -way are exempt from FWRC noise regulations. Proximity to Interstate 5 may raise the ambient noise level during construction; a separate study may prove necessary to analyze full compliance with WAC 246-366-110. Various occupant -related noises — such as playground noise, building operations noise and safety equipment noise — will remain a factor for neighboring properties, but the Applicant expects volumes and/or frequency to replicate historical patterns, Playground noise during daytime hours is exempt from FWRC noise regulations. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 18 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational -Service -Center{€ SC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8t^ Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term increases in noise levels will result from normal construction activity. The Applicant projects decibel levels associated with this activity will range between 57-89 DBA and be limited to those hours where construction activity is permitted under Federal Way code. Construction noise is typically mitigated through the use of noise attenuation devices installed on heavy equipment. On a long-term regular basis, the only exception to typical right-of-way traffic noise will be related to any concentration of school bus traffic associated with the educational use. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: With no exceptional long-term impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. Significant changes are not expected from the new campus beyond what is currently experienced. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The current use of the site as an educational facility over a number of years has ingratiated the use into the character of the adjacent residential neighborhood. After the construction activity is completed, the new facility will continue and embellish upon the traditional role of a neighborhood school and continue the District's participation in the growth of Federal Way as a community. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non -forest use? The site has not been used as either working farmland or forest lands -in recent memory. As such, given the intent to maintain an educational use, the Applicant's proposal will obviously not remove any agricultural or forest land of commercial significance from Federal Way's inventory of land resources. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: None; Not Applicable. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site is currently occupied by an educational facility of approximately 50,382 SF including related site improvements, The existing conditions plan provided with this submittal will indicate specific locations of structures, facilities and site improvements, Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 19 of 30 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY ■ PUBLIC SCHOOLS P d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Under the Applicant's proposal, all structures currently existing onsite will be demolished; please refer to the attached demolition logistics plan for additional information. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is currently zoned as RS 7.2 under the provisions of Federal Way's Zoning Code, CLASSIFICATION REQUIRED PROPOSED SETBACKS FRONT (NORTH) - SIDE (EAST) SIDE MESH 5+}' 72'40— REAR (SOUTH) MAX BUILD INC HEIGHT 55' FOR GYMS 3T-1" VF.RT7 CAL DISTANCE FROG kYERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION TO MIC POINT 39 FOR ALL OTHER 37-51 BETWEEN EA'VE & RIDGE OF HIGHEST STRUCTURES =R1Nr IPAL t10PEG R00f MAX LOTCOVF-RAGE BY "r`%MAK 11`. STRUCTURES REQUIRED PARKING EXISTING PROPOSEt7 1 PER EMPLOYEE 82 91) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The site is designated for Single -Family 1 High Density land use under the provisions of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None; Not Applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Based on City of Federal Way critical areas mapping, designated environmentally sensitive areas for the site include a large erosion hazard zone within a portion of the overall school parcel. Additionally, Wildwood Park, a neighborhood park maintained by the City of Federal Way's Parks Department & Recreation Division, lies on the parcel adjacent to the west of the northwestern portion of the school property. Slopes onsite have been identified as being eligible for designation as an Erosion Hazard Areas (EHA); primarily located along the east, south and west perimeters, areas associated with the mature tree buffer. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 20 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools EducationalService Center (E5C) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8"' Avenue South PUBLIC sCHaa�s Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There is no residential component associated with this project; when completed, the project is estimated to employ under 100 employees as either administrative staff, teachers and/or related professionals. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Lacking any residential component, there is no displacement associated with the Applicant's proposal; as part of project design, the District is formulating temporary facilities for the student population. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The Applicant is the current owner of the subject property. With no residential component, and thus no displacement, no mitigation is required. L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The very nature of the Applicant's proposal — demolishing an antiquated educational facility in order to construct a new, modern replacement facility on the same site in approximately the same location — is conducive to ensure compatibility with existing and projected land uses under any comprehensive or neighborhood plan. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: None; Not Applicable. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None; Not Applicable. Under the Applicant's proposal, there is no residential component. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. None; Not Applicable. Under the Applicant's proposal, there is no residential component. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 21 of 30 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WADI PUBLIC SCHOOLS 10. Aesthetics Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8"' Avenue South Federal Way WA 99003 (253) 945-2000 a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The Applicant's current proposal calls for a building height of approximately thirty (30) feet at the structure's highest point. The detailed preliminary architectural plans submitted with this application provide a visual and tabular schedule of building materials proposed for use on this facility. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None; Not Applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The project is subject to an Administrative Design Review conducted by the City of Federal Way as part of their Process III/Project Approval process. Under FWRC Chapter 19.115, the project must present overall design continuity through the use of similar elements throughout the project, such as architectural style and features, materials, colors and textures. Building and site design for all institutional uses are guided by FWRC 19.115.100. With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending design review and/or evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. S 300TH ST pgpp LiAL9CaPE WLLJ o ) PROPSUIt.OING --�=nunEHoaw<ib ! F W M1 Ir l J + co cr_ •� r • P U 1 z U F r C' r�x �• � � 1 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES DIAGRAM . i.Fa F•pN: i .0 .f . 'i' E MOftM Figure 9 - Community Design Guidelines Diagram - Wildwood Elementary School Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 22 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 11. Light and Glare Federal Way Public Schools -Educational Service -Center (ESC) 33330 r Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The Applicant's proposal is not projected to produce any light or glare resulting in spillover onto adjacent properties as currently designed. Exterior lighting fixtures would be required for public safety and onsite security for students, employees and visitors. The Applicant will be providing a site lighting plan/photometric analysis during the building permit process which will document the potential effect of the project's use of focused, shielded exterior lighting fixtures to eliminate glare and/or spillover. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, as designed, spillover or glare will not result from this project; therefore not creating a safety hazard and/or interfering with any views. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The only sources likely to be inflicted on the site would come from vehicle headlights on adjacent rights -of -way; an occurrence which could be at least partially addressed through onsite perimeter landscaping. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed —aside from the Applicant's commitment to a site lighting plan/photometric analysis and the use of shielded fixtures, as discussed above 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no designated or informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity — aside from playgrounds associated with the existing educational facility. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None; Not Applicable. The Applicant's proposal for a replacement educational facility will eventually include playgrounds and/or exterior recreational facilities to replace those facilities which will be demolished to facilitate the new construction, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: With no tong -term impacts on recreational opportunities identified at this stage of the project, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 23 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 P Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. The existing Wildwood Elementary School building was built in 1967; over fifty-two (52) years ago. However, to the best of the Applicant's knowledge, none of the buildings, structures and/or sites located onsite and/or in the immediate vicinity have been catalogued or are considered to be architectural, cultural or historic resources. As part of an ongoing commitment to the community, FWPS recognizes the importance of cultural preservation and the District's role in dedicating and preserving space for community use. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no landmarks, features and/or other evidence of Native American or historic use or occupation onsite or in the immediate vicinity. No material evidence, artifacts or areas of cultural importance have been identified. Given the lack of known resources or demonstrated potential for discovery, the Applicant has not retained a professional assessment of the site. If any unanticipated discoveries are made during construction, the Applicant will halt construction and consult trained professionals regarding the identification of such materials and consult with them on methodology and protocols to proceed with construction. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, given the lack of evidence regarding known cultural and/or historic resources onsite or in the immediate vicinity, and the limited potential for future discoveries, additional research was deemed unnecessary d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. With no identified cultural or historic resources having been identified, aside from a commitment involving unanticipated discoveries and having protocols in place should any be uncovered, no additional measures have been implemented, nor are any proposed. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 24 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 14. Transportation Federal Way Public Schools Educational -Service -Center (ESQ 33330 r Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Vehicular and pedestrian access to the site primarily originates from South 300th Street, a two- lane east -west roadway; using access drives provided onsite. Additional two-lane east -west roadways in the vicinity include South 298th Street to the north and South 304th Street to the south. Military Road South is located less than a mile to the east. 2311 Avenue South is a two-lane minor collector 241h Place South and 261h Avenue South are both two-lane unchannelized north -south roadways providing direct access from South 2981h Street. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, the site is not directly accessible to public transit users. The closest public transit stop is located on South 3041h Street approximately % mile from the site. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? The Wildwood campus currently provides fifty-eight (58) parking spaces; the Applicant's proposal is to increase parking by adding twenty-five (25) spaces, for a total of eighty-three (83) spaces. The new buildings will be located to serve as a buffer between the vehicular access to the sites and the play areas. The automobile drive for parent and visitor traffic at Wildwood Elementary School is located off South 300th Street at the northwest corner of the site utilizing an existing curb cut aligned with 24th Place South. This drop-off loop is developed to accommodate a long on -site queuing area. The bus and service drive is also off South 300th Street at the northeast corner of the site utilizing the existing curb cut aligned with 26th Ave South. Parking is distributed between a northwest lot, serving visitors and community users, and a northeast lot which will be used primarily by staff. Building service access utilizes the same drive as buses, but bypasses the bus loop itself. Fire lane access to the rear of the school will use the bus and service drive, passing around the southeast corner of the new school building. The fire lane is designated along the south and east sides of the western classroom wing of the new building, doubling as hard surface play area; a fire truck hammerhead turnaround is located at the south end of the classroom wing. The north -south leg of the "L" is oriented along the west property line to orient many of the classrooms toward the wooded park. The shape of the building works well to define and contain the south facing play area, situating the play area between two walls of the school, the woods to the east and south. The playfield is to be upgraded to be a synthetic turf field. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 25 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist ,y FEDERAL WAY ■ PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8"' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Under the Applicant's proposal, a preliminary traffic impact analysis was commissioned to assess existing conditions. Prepared by Transportation Engineering North West (TENW), Seattle WA, dated July 3, 2018, this study is included with this submittal. This report evaluated each school site for levels of service (LOS) relative to Federal Way standards at intersections, sight distance conditions at driveways and recommendations based on existing site layouts, driveways and parking areas. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, and pending further permitting/plan review, no added streets or major improvements to public rights -of -way will be required. The TENW study indicates all intersections serving Wildwood were operating at LOS C or better (most at LOS A or LOS 13); the current standard for Federal Way is LOS D. The report did take note of two conditions which will be addressed with construction of the new facility; the lack of crossing guards during AM - peak pick-up/drop-off and the failure of existing driveways to generally meet AASHTO sight distance requirements. Please refer to the TENW study for a detailed discussion of proposed recommendations. The existing frontage on South 308th Street is a Minor Collector per City of Federal Way, Comprehensive Plan, Map III-3, "Functional Classification of Existing and Planned Streets." Per Map III-4, "Cross Section Application by Street", South 300th Street is classified as section S. Per Appendix III -A, section S requires a 60-foot ROW (30' half),10' drive lane, 8' parking lane, 4' planter strip and 5' sidewalk. Proposed frontage improvements will be restricted to the south side of the street and include standard elements consisting of drive lane, parking lane, planter strip and sidewalk. In order to meet ADA compliance requirements, code compliant ADA ramps will be provided at the curbs across from 2nd, 3rd and 41" Avenues. The near side of the street would be widened from existing 8' to 18'. In front of the playfield, the curb line will be close to the existing extruded curb. Construction will either repair or replace existing site improvements such as curb, gutter and sidewalk as required by code, and upgrade perimeter landscape to full compliance with code. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No; Not Applicable. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Under the Applicant's proposal, the TENW study provides an inventory of existing roadway conditions, traffic study intersections, existing daily and peak hour traffic volumes and intersection levels of service. Given the structured schedule — arrivals (AM Peak) and dismissals (PM Peak) - associated with educational activity, the Applicant feels existing traffic patterns and volumes will generally remain consistent with data associated with the existing facility. Changes in enrollment for the new facility, along with related staff increases, may affect traffic/trip-related Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 26 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service -Center (E-SQ - FEDERAL WAY 33330 P Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 data in the future. A complete transportation impact analysis of the proposed Wildwood facility will be prepared in conjunction with Federal Way's Process III/Project Approval review. For an enhanced understanding of current LOS conditions, please refer to the data in the AM/PM Intersection Levels of Service tables below. 2018 Existing AM Peak Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection LOS Delay sec V /C Ratio Unsionc rJaed intersarifons # 1 - S 300t St / 23rd Ave S AWS A 7.3 0,29 #2 - S 3001" St ! 241^ PI S / West Driveway EB I A 0.3 0.00 WB i A 3.8 0.03 NB Left B 12.9 024 SB Left B 12.7 0.09 #3 - S 3001' Si / 261h Ave S / East Driveway EB A 0.7 0.00 WB A 0.0 0,00 NB Left I B 10.0 0,07 SB Left B 9.2 0.01 Source: Highway Capacity Manual". Special Report 209, lransperlwion Research Board, 2010 2018-Existing PM Peak Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection LOS Delay (sec) VIC Ratio _Unsignahzed Inrerseclions # 1 - S 30011 St / 231d Ave S AWS I A 7.7 0.02 #2 - S 30011' St / 2411) PI S / West Driveway EB I .A 1.2 0.01 WB A 2.6 0.03 NB Left B 13.9 0.17 SB Left B 13.4 0.10 #3 - S 300'" St / 26'11 Ave S / East Driveway EB A 1.9 0.02 WB A 0.0 0.00 NB Left B 12.6 012 S9 Left B 10.7 0.06 Source: 'Kghwoy CcOACITV Manual' Spend: 209 1r_nspoft"on Research Board. 2010. The existing gross floor area built at the Wildwood Elementary School comprises approximately 50,382 square -feet (including the main building and portable structures) and serves approximately 550 students. The proposed gross floor area (GFA) of the new school is approximately 60,322 SF with a student capacity to serve up to 600 students. Per published trip generation rates within the Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), for Land Use Code 520 - Elementary School, there is no correlative basis to derive estimated changes in vehicle trip generation based on changes in floor area, but better evidence of correlation on daily trips and significantly higher number of studies based on student population. Based on TENW's extensive experience in reviewing K-12, private schools, and numerous community colleges throughout the Pacific Northwest, the hest correlative predictor of increase traffic demand is student enrollment at school institutions. Bulletin #050 - October 17, 2016 Page 27 of 30 01-landouts\Environmental Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESG) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8"' Avenue South QB�TG 5����L� Federal Way WA 9�8003 (253) 945-2000 As such, based on the net increase of approximately 150 students, the net increase in vehicle trips on a daily basis is estimated at 283 daily trips, with approximately 100 new trips generated during peak arrival periods, 50 new trips generated during peak dismissal periods, and 26 new vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic (i.e., the worse -case scenario). The Traffic Impact Analysis will review peak arrival/dismissal periods at existing/proposed site driveways during peak arrivalldismissal periods and other vicinity study intersections that serve the school vicinity during the p.m, peak periods of adjacent street traffic considering this increased trip generation in addition to existing site trip generation.. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No; Not Applicable. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, aside from required frontage improvements, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. Should increases in student enrollment related to expanded capacity be realized, traffic impact fees may be assessed for each new PM peak -hour trip ($2.00) generated in accordance with current Federal Way code. However the Applicant cautions that as an educational facility with variable enrollment and staffing, traditional trip generation models may not accurately reflect the actual impacts associated with the new elementary school. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Given the nature of the Applicant's proposal — replacing an outdated educational facility with a modern, updated facility — the Applicant does not project any increase in the demand for public services — either during demolition, construction or future operations. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 28 of 30 k:lHandoutslEnvironmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities cu Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service-Center-(E-SC�— - 33330 8"' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewerr eptic system, All required utilities are currently available at the site; including, but not limited to, electricity, natural gas, water and sewer service, refuse and recycling service, telephone, cable television and other communication services. Pending further permitting/plan review analysis and the installation of proposed improvements onsite to facilitate new connections and to remove existing infrastructure, capacity of all public and franchise utilities is presumed to be adequate. Lakehaven Water and Sewer District will be providing Certificates of Availability for both water and sewer later in the review/permitting process. Negotiations regarding the extent of specific system improvements needed to provide adequate capacity are ongoing and will be concluded via a Developer Extension Agreement executed between FWPS and Lakehaven. The site is currently receiving sewer service from a single connection point (SSCP 1738) located at the northern perimeter of the site, directly across from the intersection of 26th Avenue South. The onsite portion of proposed sewer improvements will see a new line extending due south through the parking field; connecting to the new school building at several points; including a new 8-inch line extending from the building to connect to a manhole at the north edge of the playfield. Preliminary analysis on the adequacy of existing water lines/service to meet the fire flow required by South King Fire and Rescue (2,750 GPM) indicates replacement of an existing 6-inch main in South 3001h Street with a 12-inch water main, at minimum, from 23rd Avenue South, eastward to 26th Avenue South. An additional 12-inch main may be required onsite as well. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Please refer to the civil engineering plans provided with this submittal — particularly the cover sheet where utilities and contacts are typically itemized, and the preliminary utility plans (water, sewer and stormwater) for specific details on proposed utility connections and the extent of necessary public improvements. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 29 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS C. SIGNATURE Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8"' Avenue Soutar Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature• .. '�; �.�.�.� i � ,' .�. ��•" Name of Signee: Robert McNeill Position and Agency/Organization: Senior Planner, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Date Submitted: September 25, 2018 Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 30 of 30 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Ph F.." rr: PI.I.( WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY 5CHUUL OESCPIPUON JMIUNfY 1. 1019 F URE DOWNSTREAM eering pIIr. DRAINAGE MAP 11 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: CC: FROM: V TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest November 16, 2018 Robert Evans, PE, Capital Projects Manager Casey Moore, Project Manager, FWPS Support Services Center Michael Read, PE, Principal, TENW SUBJECT: Federal Way School District - Response to Comments Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, and Wildwood Elementary School TENW Project No. 3623 EECEI ED JAN 10 2019 0TY OF FEDEPA W,1,y COMMUNITY 0EVEL )Phir�M' This memorandum provides a response to the October 23, 2018 letter titled "Responses to Environmental Checklists for Potentially Proposed Federal Way Elementary Schools" from Robert "Doc" Hansen, Planning Manager for the City of Federal Way. LAKE GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL The following traffic comments by Soma Chattopadhyay related to Lake Grove Elementary School of the Federal Way School District have been addressed: 1. City's Adopted LOS Standard 2. Size Clarification 3. Traffic Impact Fee Calculation 4. Queuing Analysis and Bus Turning Diagram 5. Sight Distance Issues - Realign eastern driveway with 3rd Ave SW or 2nd Ave SW 6. School Safe Walk Route Response 1: The City's adopted LOS standard is 1.2 for signalized intersections and 1.0 for unsignalized intersections. All study intersections and site driveway intersections meet the City's adopted LOS standards. Response 2: The existing gross floor area of 51,238 square feet with a 450-student capacity is correctly identified in the TIA. The 450 students is the capacity at the elementary school and is therefore, a conservative estimate. Response 3: Per the traffic impact fee rate of $2.00 per square foot for an elementary school, the proposed development would need to provide a fee of $24,704.00 based on a net increase of Transportation Planning I Design I Traffic Impact & Operations PO Box 65254, Seattle, WA 98155 1 Office (206) 361-7333 Federal Way School District- Lake Grove Elementary School Response to Comments 12,352 square feet (51,238 square feel existing and 63,590 square feet future). The TIA has been updated per this correction. Response 4: Please see the "Queuing Analysis and Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Loading Areas" section in the updated TIA. Please note that: School bus turning radiuses at site driveways and adjacent intersections for Lake Grove Elementary School will be provided by other Team members. Response 5: The sight distance identified in the Existing Conditions memo at Intersection #5 — SW 3081h Street / East Driveway is based on a 260-foot minimum sight distance to the east. Per the photo provided in Attachment A, driver entering sight distance to the east is a maximum of 300 feet. Therefore, sight distance is met for a 25 mph design speed on SW 308ih Street at the East Driveway. Response 6: Please see the "School Safe Walk Route" section in the updated TIA. MIRROR LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOO The following traffic comments by Sarady Long related to Mirror Lake Elementary School of the Federal Way School District have been addressed: 1 . TIA Engineering Stamp 2. City's Adopted LOS Standard 3. School Safe Walk Route, Queuing Analysis, School Zone Flasher Enhancement, School Bus Turning Radius at Driveways and Adjacent Street Intersections 4. Neighborhood Impacts Related to Drop Off and Loading Locations 5. Recommended Improvements in TIA and New School Layout Conflicts 6. No Parking Signs on Adjacent Neighborhood Streets 7. Update TIA per Above Comments SEPA Environmental Checklist - Notice of Consultation SEPA Environmental Checklist of 62,550 SF is not consistent with project description of 60,322 SF in SEPA Checklist. 7. Checklist Item # 14. Transportation (b) - Transit Slops update 8. Checklist Item #14. Transportation (d) - Pedestrian path and roadway improvements including right-of-way dedication. On -site improvements for safe walking route. 9. Checklist Item #14. Transportation If) - Trip generation clarification. 10. Checklist Item #14. Transportation (h) —Traffic impact fee assessment. Response 1: The TIA has been updated with an engineering stamp by Michael Read, PE. TENW November 16, 18 Page 2 Federal Way School District - Lake Grove Elementary School Response to Comments Response 2: The City's adopted LOS standard is 1.2 for signalized intersections and 1 .0 for unsignalized intersections. All study intersections and site driveway intersections meet the City's adopted LOS standards. Response 3: Please see the "School Safe Walk Route" section in the updated TIA. Please see the "Queuing Analysis and Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Loading Areas" section in the updated TIA. A school zone flasher enhancement should be provided on 8rh Avenue S and SW 308,h Street. This has been added in the "School Safe Walk Route" section in the updated TIA. Please note that: School bus turning radiuses at site driveways and adjacent intersections for Lake Grove Elementary School will be provided by other Team members. Response 4: Please see the "Queuing Analysis and Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Loading Areas" section in the updated TIA. Response 5: The new school layout was created after the Existing Conditions memorandum was completed. Figure 4 in the Existing Conditions memorandum document recommendations only. Recommendations do not necessarily always have to be implemented when creating the new school layout. The new school layout (site plan) should be used when analyzing traffic impacts. Response 6: Figure 4 in the Existing Conditions memorandum document recommendations only. Recommendations do not necessarily always have to be implemented. However, to accommodate the City, Figure 4 of the Existing Conditions memorandum for Mirror Lake Elementary School has been updated to remove the "no parking signs" and is provided as Attachment B. Response 7: The TIA has been updated to address the City's comments above. Response 8: The checklist has been updated to reflect closest transit stop locations. Response 9: The checklist has been updated to reflect pedestrian path and roadways improvements and safe walk route. Response 10: The trip generation is correct, and is based on a conservative account as current school buildings have a capacity of 450 students, and the new buildings will be sized for 600 students. Response 1 1: The checklist has been updated. Per the traffic impact fee rate of $2.00 per square foot for an elementary school, the proposed development would need to provide a fee of $17,574.00 based on a net increase of 8,787 square feet (54,803 square feet existing and 63,590 square feet future). The TIA has been updated per this correction. %9 TENW November 16, 18 Page 3 Federal Way School District - Lake Grove Elementary School Response to Comments WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL The following traffic comments by Erik Preston related to Wildwood Elementary School of the Federal Way School District have been addressed: 1 . Checklist Item # 14. Transportation (b) - Transit Stops update 2. Checklist Item #14. Transportation (d) - Pedestrian path and roadway improvements including right-of-way dedication. On -site improvements for safe walking route. 3.. Checklist Item # 14. Transportation (1) - Trip generation. 4. Checklist Item # 14. Transportation (h) — Traffic impact fee assessment. 5. TIA Engineering Stamp 6. City's Adopted LOS Standard 7. Daily Traffic Volumes Clarification 8. Safe Walk Route 9. Neighborhood Impacts Related to Drop Off and Loading Locations 10. No Parking Signs on Adjacent Neighborhood Streets 1 1 . Speed Bumps — Mini -Roundabout Installation 12. Update TIA per Above Comments 13. Traffic Impact Fee Calculation Response 1: The checklist has been updated to reflect closest transit stop locations Response 2: The checklist has been updated with correct street names for S 3006 Street and classification with Type-U applicable roadway improvements. The checklist has also been updated with maintenance and improvements to the pedestrian paths on the south side of the property. Response 3: The trip generation is correct, and is based on a conservative account as current school buildings have a capacity of 450 students, and the new buildings will be sized for 600 students. The 1 Oth Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual for Land Use 520 was used. Although it has been requested that gross floor area be used to determine trip generation, the use of students is a more conservative approach. With a net new increase of 13,208 square feet, the proposed development would only generate a net increase of about 90 new trips during peak arrival times (AM Peak Hour of the Generator) and 42 new trips during peak dismissal times (PM Peak Hour of the Generator), with both numbers being less than what was identified in the TIA. Response 4: The checklist has been updated. Per the traffic impact fee rate of $2.00 per square foot for an elementary school, the proposed development would need to provide a fee of $26,416.00 based on a net increase of 13,208 square feet (50,382 square feet existing and 63,590 square feet future). The TIA has been updated per this correction. Response 5: The TIA has been updated with an engineering stamp by Michael Read, PE. TE N W November 16, 18 Go 4 Federal Way School District - Lake Grove Elementary School Response to Comments Response 6: The City's adopted LOS standard is 1 .2 for signalized intersections and 1.0 for unsignalized intersections. All study intersections and site driveway intersections meet the City's adopted LOS standards. Response 7: Figures 3 and 6 in the TIA have updated daily traffic volumes. Response 8: Please see the "School Safe Walk Route" section in the updated TIA. Please see the "Queuing Analysis and Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Loading Areas" section in the updated TIA. Please note that: School bus turning radiuses at site driveways and adjacent intersections for Lake Grove Elementary School will be provided by other Team members. Response 9: Please see the "Queuing Analysis and Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Loading Areas" section in the updated TIA. Response 10: Figure 4 in the Existing Conditions memorandum document recommendations only. Recommendations do not necessarily always have to be implemented. However, to accommodate the City, Figure 4 of the Existing Conditions memorandum for Wildwood Elementary School has been updated to remove the "no parking signs" and is provided as Attachment C. Response 1 1: Figure 4 in the Existing Conditions memorandum document preliminary recommendations only. To address City comments, Figure 4 of the Existing Conditions memorandum for Wildwood Elementary School has been updated to remove the "speed bumps" recommendation and is provided as Attachment C. The intersection control at each site driveway intersection onto S 300rh Street has been updated to roundabouts, and therefore, the LOS has been updated. Please see the Site Access and Safety Issues updates and LOS results with the project in 2020 in the updated TIA. Response 12: The TIA has been updated to address the corrections identified. Response 13: Per the traffic impact fee rate of $2.00 per square foot for an elementary school, the proposed development would need to provide a fee of $26,416.00 based on a net increase of 13,208 square feet (50,382 square feet existing and 63,590 square feet future). The TIA has been updated per this correction. If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at (206) 361-7333 x 101 or mikeread@tenw.com. TENW November 16, 18 Page 5 Attachment A Lake Grove Elementary School Entering Sight Distance - x 0,04, 0000, 1-0 �`' yr• i�`, s % W17: 26ff-nilntoDoadwait2-5mph speed limits- -n .0 Attachment B Mirror Lake Elementary School Existing Conditions Figure 4 - Recommendations •� X yam" ti 4k r e � I + � Y not be possible it unknown. r residential or other restrictions _ here. Would need to make -this - +� two-way all the way up to south parking lot area. 17R low iA ■ ■ t 'l ■ •i �- -�' Provide traffic cones and�.I 3r Install Crosswalk and s, !M •� f :zi signs for buses only. Provide as a Crossing Install One -Way Exit, Do Guard Location. ■� Not Enter sign. - rr ,i ■ -�,a th' Fare ; Lit'' .r ■ :, ►r Extend the existing Loading Area by Creating o New r„- Parking Lot with a Student 'Widen and reconstruct this Pick -Up and Drop -Off Area. Parking Lot with a Pick -Up • a �, a Make Sure Parents Pull and Drop -Off Area. -- a Forward. Construct sidewalks Construct sidewalks and i( crosswalks where • .,� _ and crosswalks where necessary - portable Remo existing portables. Construct sidewalks for Keep exit only- students to walk on, _ y Widen the existing loading area for 2 lanes so vehicles can easily get out of the me. Oil loading lane when they pick up and drop off students. This will improve Keep enter only. .: �,� , a+ � •' ,; traffic flow. L (Not to Scale) - Figure 4 Federal Way Mirror Lake Elementary School School District � TENW Mirror Lake Elementary Arrival and ❑ismissal Period School Proposed Recommendations Existing Conditions Attachment C Wildwood Elementary School Existing Conditions Figure 4 - Recommendations dp Provide Crossing Guards in the AM and PM. Add Traffic Cones along this section to prevent vehicles from parking too close to the intersection. CDJ(Not to Scale) Figure 4 Federal Way I^ Wildwood Elementary School School District (1; T E W Wildwood Elementary Arrival and Dismissal Period School Proposed Recommendations Existing Conditions A /%DTENW Transportation Engineering NorlhWesl MEMORANDUM DATE: November 16, 2018"p` �ONAr , , yq TO: Robert Evans, PE, Capital Projects Manager..�; ' CC: Casey Moore, Project Manager FWPS Support Services Center •. ` ;. ��a asS1�NAL FROM: Michael J. Read, PE, Principal, TENW :-_A .t-xP� 2/28/2019 SUBJECT: Federal Way School District — Wildwood Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis TENW Project No. 3623-6 This memorandum summarizes a traffic impact analysis for the proposed renovation of Federal Way School District's Wildwood Elementary School located at 2405 S 300th Street in Federal Way, WA. This memo includes a project description, a description of existing transportation conditions within the immediate site vicinity, methodology used to derive the trip generation estimate, trip distribution, traffic operational analysis of key off -site intersections and site driveway intersections under cumulative impacts, and identification of any transportation mitigation measures to offset traffic impacts. Project Description The proposed renovation of Federal Way School District's Wildwood Elementary School is located at 2405 S 300th Street in Federal Way, WA. A project site vicinity map is shown in Figure 1 . For the purposes of this analysis, year 2020 was the horizon year assumed to evaluate cumulative traffic impacts. The existing gross floor area built at the Wildwood Elementary School comprises of approximately 50,382 square -feet (including the main building and portable structures) and serves approximately 450 students. The proposed gross floor area of the new school is approximately 63,590 square -feet with a student capacity to serve up to 600 students. Therefore, there would be a net increase of approximately 13,208 square -feet and 150 students in student -capacity with the proposed renovation. Existing and proposed site access is provided via two existing site driveways onto S 300th Street. The west site driveway will remain a full -access site driveway. The east site driveway is currently restricted to an exit -only driveway and would be converted to a full -access site driveway with the project. The renovated west parking lot would provide 1 1 visitor parking stalls and the renovated east parking lot would provide 50 staff parking stalls. As part of the project, roadway frontage improvements would be required along S 300th Street. A conceptual site plan of the project is illustrated in Figure 2. Transportation Planning I Design I Traffic Impact & Operations PO Box 65254, Seattle, WA 98155 1 Office (206) 361-7333 S 300th St C4 N Wildwood Elementary School S 302nd St ✓7 y i t N � N S 3041h St Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300t^ Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 5 302nd PI S 298th St S 300th St C � 301st`$1. , 1 y.� -cc r' I � N (Not to Scale) Federal Way � T E N W Figure 1 School District Project Site Vicinity Wildwood Elementary Schaal Traffic Impact Analysis VTENW page 2 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 5 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis N Q) N > a � (V N .... .._ _ - - •Il11i111� Irl,lin PO Access - S 300th St Full Access =' _ Rriv_BwaY ------ Driveway West Parking Lot i-ti... "._ c 4V "s•t`�`'' Student Pick -Up/ Drop -Off Lot I , G O Drod O O (� ?f Eost Parking Lot " Bus Pick -Up/ J F� Drop -Off Lot LE t L P .... _ 9 (Not to Scole( Federal Way V T E N W Figure 2 School District Conceptual Site Plan WildwoScchoomentary Traffic Impact Analysis TTENW page 3 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Existing Transportation Conditions This section includes an inventory of existing roadway conditions, key intersections in the site vicinity, existing daily and peak hour traffic volumes, intersection levels of service, nonmotorized facilities and planned roadway improvements. Roadway Conditions The following paragraphs describe existing arterial roadways that would be used for site access. Roadway characteristics are described in terms of number of lanes, posted speed limits, shoulder types and widths. S 3OOth Street is a two-lane roadway. Adjacent to Wildwood Elementary School, the roadway travel width is approximately 22 feet with sidewalks and rolled curbs on the north side of the Street, and an approximate 7-foot shoulder for parking with curb and a 5-foot paved pathway on the south side of the street. West of 24th Place S, the roadway is unchannelized with a 30-foot pavement width between the rolled curb on the north side of the street and curb on the south side of the street. East of 26th Avenue S, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are also provided on the south side of the street. The speed limit is posted at 25 mph with a 20 mph flashing posted speed during school arrival and dismissal periods. A vehicle speed survey was conducted ,June 2018 by idax Data Solutions on S 3OOth Street between the West and East Driveway, with a 5Oth percentile speed of 18 mph, 85th percentile speed of 22 mph and a 951h percentile speed of 25 mph in the eastbound direction, and in the westbound direction, a 5Oth percentile speed of 19 mph, 851h percentile speed of 22 mph and a 95ih percentile speed of 25 mph. 23rd Avenue S is a two-lane minor collector. The roadway is unchannelized with open ditches on both sides of the street south of S 3OOth Street, with curbs, gutters and sidewalks provided on the west side of the street north of S 3OOth Street. The total pavement width is approximately 35 feet north of and 22 feet south of S 3OOth street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. 24th Place S is a Iwo -lane unchannelized roadway with foot sidewalks rolled curbs on both sides of the street. The total pavement width is approximately 28 feet. The speed limit is posted at 25 mph. 26th Avenue S is a two-lane unchannelized roadway with a total pavement width of approximately 27 feet, with sidewalks and rolled curbs on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Traffic Study Intersections The following intersections were analyzed during the AM and PM peak hour: GI)TENW page 4 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District- Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 1 . S 300rh Street / 23rd Avenue S 2. S 300ih Street / 24ih Place S / West Driveway 3. S 300rh Street / 26ih Avenue S / East Driveway Existing Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Peak hour traffic volumes represent the highest hourly volume of vehicles passing through an intersection during a typical 7-9 AM and 4-6 PM weekday peak period. Average weekday daily traffic counts and peak period turning movement counts were conducted during the AM and PM peak hour in June 2018 by lclax Data Solutions during the 7-9 AM, 4-6 PM at off -site study intersections and at 2-6 PM periods at school driveway intersections. Figure 3 summarizes existing daily, AM and PM peak period turning movements at the study intersections. Traffic counts are provided in Attachment A. During the p.m. peak hour, please note that all study intersections, including the off -site study intersection W) was analyzed based upon the weekday p.m. peak hour of the generator for the proposed project (peak dismissal time for one hour between 2:30 to 3:30 p.m.) as this was determined to be the p.m. peak hour for all study intersections. Existing Intersection Levels of Service Intersection levels of service (LOS) analyses were conducted at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hour of 2018 existing conditions. LOS refers to the degree of congestion on a roadway or intersection. It is a measure of vehicle operating speed, travel time, travel delays, and driving comfort. A letter scale from A to F generally describes LOS. At signalized intersections, LOS A represents free -flow conditions -motorists experience little or no delays, and LOS F represents forced -flow conditions -motorists experience an average delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. The LOS reported for signalized intersections represents the average control delay per vehicle entering the intersection. The LOS reported at stop -controlled intersections is also based on the average control delay (sec/veh) and is reported for each movement. Therefore, the reported LOS at unsignalized intersections does not represent a measure of the overall operations of the intersection. LOS calculations for both signalized and stop -controlled intersections were calculated using the methodologies and procedures outlined in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board (TRB). Table 1 outlines the LOS criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections based on these methodologies. The City of Federal Way's LOS standard is a v/c ratio of 1 .2 for signalized intersections and 1 .0 for unsignalized intersections. Existing AM and PM peak hour LOS analyses are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. As shown, all intersections operate at LOS B or better with a v/c ratio under 1 .0 during the AM and PM peak hour under 2018 existing conditions. Detailed LOS summary worksheets are included in Attachment B. V TEN W page 5 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District- Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Wasl YQ 12121 I21 1301 131 1II 9 <-- 29 131) )7 I asi�a,7u/ j5j10� a I � I (1261 38 1541 1221 127j s wav S 3001h SI/23rd Ave S 11 113I (0 f171 114) F9(14) r 43s(54 LIS 2981h St [ �I _ (1)0� f S3aamSr/261hAveS I27) I5 � ¢' EOLS Nveway 131 81 196J .. 7)� II) 131K�9(2) 0 7 .; t-- 30 (371 N N I rowo ie 5 3CQ.v� 5P 3 > (4) 12140)39—► 1 20 1 II1221 191 I151 QN S 300th StN S 300th St N W ildwood F Elementary N s 30iSEi5t_ School 2 N S 302nd St ' 5 302nd P[ 4i H 0 FL N N S 304th St Legend 45 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (65) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 5,000 Daily Traffic Volumes INor In 5cafel Federal Way Figure 3 School District `� T E NW2018 Existing Daily, AM, PM Wildwood Elementary Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Schaal Traffic Impact Analysis $31Jtllri Su7sm PIS TEN W page 6 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Table 1 Level of Service Criteria for Intersections Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service -- � - Average Delay Range (sec) Delay Range (sec)__ q <10 <10 B >10fo<-20 >10tos15 C > 20 to < 35 > 15 to < 25 D >35to<55 >25to<35 E > 55 to < 80 > 35 to < 50 F > 80 > 50 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010. Table 2 2018 Existina AM Peak Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection LOS Delay (sec) V/C Ratio Unsignalized intersecflon5 # 1 - S 3001h St / 231d Ave S A WS A 7.8 0.29 #2 - S 3001h St / 241h PI S / West Driveway EB A 7.4 0.00 W B A 7.8 0.03 NB Left B 12.7 0.24 SB Left B 12.7 0.03 #3 - S 3001h St / 26th Ave S / East Driveway EB A 7.3 0.00 WB I A 0.0 0.00 NB Left A 9.9 0.07 SB Left I A 9.2 0.01 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010 Table 3 2018 Existing PM Peak Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection LOS Delay (sec) V/C Ratio Unsi nafized intersections I # 1 - S 3001h St / 23rd Ave S A WS I A 7.7 0.30 #2 - S 3001h St / 241h PI S / West Driveway EB A 7.8 0.02 WB I A 8.0 0.03 NB Left B 13.4 0.17 SB Left B 13.1 0.10 #3 - S 3001h St / 26th Ave S / East Driveway EB A 7.6 0.02 W B A 0.0 0.00 NB Left I B 11.7 0.11 SB Left B 10.5 0.06 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010 IVTE N W page 7 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 3001" Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Nonmotorized Facilities Sidewalks or paved pedestrian pathways are located on S 300th Street, 24th Place S and 26rh Avenue S. Marked crosswalks are located along all intersections of S 300th Street at the north and east legs of 23rd Avenue S, at the north, south and west legs of 241h Place S / West Driveway, and at north, south and east legs of 26rh Avenue S / East Driveway. Planned Transportation Improvements No planned transportation capacity improvements impacting Wildwood Elementary School based were identified in the City of Federal Way's 2019-2023 Transportation Improvement Program. Existing Sight Distance Field work was conducted by TENW along S 300th Street on Monday, June 11, 2018. Driver entering sight distance at the West Driveway onto S 300th Street is approximately 270 feet to the west and 195 feet to the east and at the East Driveway onto S 300th Street is approximately 200 feet to the west and greater than 600 feet to the east given a sharp vertical curve between the two site driveways. Assuming a 20 mph design speed on S 300th Street (during peak arrival/dismissal periods), based upon AASHTO design requirements, a minimum of 225 feet is required for entering sight distance and 115 feet is required for design stopping sight distance for left -turns (AASHTO Green Book, Exhibit 9-55. Design Intersection Sight Distance — Case B 1 — Left Turn from Stop) Therefore, the West and East Driveways onto S 300th Street do not meet minimum AASHTO entering sight distance requirements, but minimum stopping sight distance is provided for a 25 mph design speed and a downslope of 9 percent grade along S 300th Street (in excess of 175 feet) that provides for a minimum level of safety. Traffic Impact Analysis The following section describes projected future baseline traffic growth, new trips generated by the proposed development, distribution and assignment of new project trips, intersection level of service and daily traffic volume impacts, nonmotorized impacts, site access, safety and circulation issues, and identification of transportation mitigation to offset impacts. 2020 Baseline Traffic Volumes Full buildout of the project is anticipated for the year 2020. Existing traffic counts estimated in 2018 were factored by 3 percent per year to estimate daily, a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes under 2020 baseline conditions without the project. Future traffic volume estimates are provided in Attachment C. VTENW page 8 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District- Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Project Trip Generation Per published trip generation rates within the Trip Generation Manual, IOth Edition, 2017, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), for Land Use Code 520 - Elementary School, there is no correlative basis to derive estimated changes in vehicle trip generation based on changes in floor area, but better evidence of correlation on daily trips and significantly higher number of studies based on student population. Based on TENW's extensive experience in reviewing K- 12, private schools, and numerous community colleges throughout the Pacific Northwest, the best correlative predictor of increase traffic demand is student enrollment at school institutions. As such, as shown in Table 4, based on the net increase of approximately 150 students, the net increase in vehicle trips on a daily basis is estimated at 284 daily trips, with approximately 98 new trips generated during peak arrival periods (AM Peak Hour of Generator), 51 new trips generated during peak dismissal periods (PM Peak Hour of Generator), and 26 new vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic (i.e., the worse -case scenario). Table 4 Wildwood Elementary School Trip Generation Summary Time Period In Out Total Weekday Daily 142 142 284 Weekday AM Peak Hour of Generator 53 45 98 Weekday PM Peak Hour of Generator 23 28 51 Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic 12 14 26 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 101h Edition, 2017. Trip Distribution and Assignment Project trip distribution is based upon traffic counts that were conducted in June 2018 during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour at all off -site and site driveway study intersections. Generally, distribution and assignment of project trips were assumed as follows: ➢ 25 percent north via 231d Avenue S 24th Place S and 26th Avenue S; ➢ 40 percent south via 23rd Avenue S; ➢ 10 percent west via S 300th Street; and ➢ 25 percent east via S 300th Street. Figure 4 illustrates trip distribution and Figure 5 shows the daily, a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour trip assignment at the study intersections during the 2020 horizon year. Figures 6 and 7 summarize daily, a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour traffic volume impacts of the proposed renovation of Federal Way School District's Wildwood Elementary School project in 2020. TTENW page 9 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 1 � a �n S 298th St L f Q L ✓7' ' 70 a S 300th S S 300th St Wildwood Elementary N 1 s_3ots: St School N S 302nd St �- 5 302.nd Pl Qe L� to h V1 (y a a s s_304th St c 04 N01 to S,::::: Federal Way � TEN W Figure 4 School District Project Trip Distribution WildwoScchoomentary Traffic Impact Analysis Gd)TENW page 10 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis S 3001h S1/23rd Ave S '411— 3 (51 I2) 5 S t-- 3 151 f5) 2 E— 3 (5) 1 I3} .Q 1512 14 3 I 1512—� 9 (27)12- 1231 (5) 121 ° (21) 1 t 45 = N S 300th St JIM Wildwood { Elementary School IN S 302nd St 5 302np N d d lc NI N 2 S 304th St S 298th St — l- (3) i F 1 (3) w � Sj1* 1' R s >rso•�� x 121 I 3 1 6 7p (5) 2 (51 121 191 Q S 300th St r S 301 stl,,St Z. Legend 45 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (65) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 5,000 Doily Traffic Volumes INol Figure 5 Federal Way IF T E NW Dail, AM g ySchool District 8� PM Peak Hour Wildwood Elementary Project Trip Assignment School Traffic Impact Analysis GgDTENW page 1 1 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 5 3001h 51/23rd Ave 5 a 2 1341 14 (18) 2 (321 3 E— 33 137) 0 118 29 F 161191 1 31 1331 ,J �57(751 53DCrn 5r i 5 ewIn Sr _ 5 R t S Mth St_- 1 —14 j I (251 20 --30- 57 23 29 S 3071h S11261n Avg S (341 29 -->• ;a 3 e 104 1160) 134 � � (boy 1281 1311 Eus III ive—o c 2 1 � t1 I iL •� 0 14) 17 t— 39 142) L �°fI(l 660 s kw:,1 S. > N (705) 4 � �) t Q (45) 42 —► - 23 10 16 20 N (5)0 ': (281 (121 r25) 0- 0' S 300th St S 3001h St N Wildwood Elementary N _f 53o1st15f a School l CO N �F S 302nd St 1. _S 3o2nd PI yr� >i ' Q � �1 N N n G. d L ME V LO N N 5 304th St Legend 45 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Without Project (65) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Project 5,000 Daily Traffic Volumes Without Project (5,000) Daily Traffic Volumes With Project 1(h19 a1 Ia We) Federal Way Figure 6 School District TE N W 2020 Daily and AM Peak Wildwood Elementary Hour Traffic Volume Impacts $Chool Traffic Impact Analysis 94TEN W page 12 November 16, 2018 S 300th St/23rd Ave S 12 (13) 10 18 115 ■-- :0114) 46'1501" 5r I i Illo�i I t 1 (27) 16 --*-¢ S 18 47 (114 �1 13 (8) t981 N N Q `~ S 300th St N Q N S 302nd St Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis S 300th west $1/241h PI S UwLwa n 13 114E 7 112 8 5 9— 31 1341 195 (201 3:H1m t� f 't' (251 22 > 21 12 14 (521 40 �', 1351 f 141 f 151 Wildwood Elementary School N N a d L L V N N S 3041h Sf ) S 298th St - .v_ I3ppen 2+I261h Ave S EPS+ Clrivewa Ill 10 13 0 7 p F 32 133) o lsl s 3aun' sr 3� I t I ° (43)411 1% 21 1 12 70 1210 ; (241 (2) 1171 a S 300th S1 S 30)nd PI IF 5 301 st15t Legend 45 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Without Project (65) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Project 9 f N0+ ro scow, ) Figure 7 Federal Way TEN W 9 School District 2020 PM Peak Hour Wildwood Elementary Traffic Volume Impacts School Traffic Impact Analysis IrTENW page 13 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Intersection Level of Service and Daily Traffic Volume Impacts Tables 5 and 6 summarize level of service impacts in 2020 assuming full buildout of the proposed renovation of Federal Way School District's Wildwood Elementary School project. As shown, all study intersections are projected to operate at LOS C or better with a v/c ratio under 1.0 during the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour with or without the project in 2020. Detailed LOS summary worksheets are included in Attachment B. Daily traffic volumes on S 300th Street between 246 Place S and 26th Avenue S would increase by about 45 vehicles with the project in 2020. Table 5: 2020 AM Peak Intersection Level of Service Impacts 2020 Without Project 2020 With Project Delay v/C Delay V/C Study Intersection LOS (sec)Ratio LOS l5ec] Ratio 1lnsignalized Intersections # 1 - S 3001h St / 23rd Ave S A WS A 7.9 0.29 A 8.2 0.40 #2 - S 3001h St / 24th PI S / West Driveway EB A 7.4 0.01 W B A 7.9 0.03 - - NB Left B 13.1 0.25 - - - SB Left B 13.0 0.10 - w Roundabout - - - A 5.6 0.24 #3 - S 300th St / 26th Ave S / East Driveway EB A 7.3 0.00 -- -- - W B A 0.0 0.00 -- -- - NB Left A 9.9 0.07 -- -- - SB Left I A 9.2 0.01 -- - - Roundabout I - - -- A 4.2 0.07 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010 Table 6: 2020 PM Peak Intersection Level of Service Impacts 2020 Without Project 2020 With Project Delay v/C Delay v/C Study Intersection LOS Isec) Ratio LOS (sec) Ratio Unsignafized Intersections i # 1 - S 300}h St / 23rd Ave S A 7.8 0.31 A 8.0 0.31 AWS #2 - S 300'h St / 24th PI S / West Driveway j A 7.8 0.02 - -- EB W B ' A 8.0 0.03 - NB Left B 13.8 0.18 SB Left B 14.0 0.11 Roundabout - A 5.3 0.16 #3 - S 300rh St / 26th Ave S / East Driveway A 7.7 0.02 EB W B A 0.0 0.00 NB Left B 11.9 0.12 SB Left B 10.5 0.06 Roundabout A 4.8 0.11 TTENW page 14 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Nonmotorized Impacts As part of the proposed project, raised sidewalks would be provided along the school property frontage on S 300th Street. Marked crosswalks and speed bump crosswalks on S 300th Street along the school property frontage would remain the same. Site Access and Safety Issues Existing and proposed site access is provided via two existing site driveways onto S 300th Street. The west site driveway will remain a full -access site driveway. The east site driveway is currently restricted to an exit -only driveway and would be converted to a full -access site driveway with the project. The renovated west parking lot would provide 1 1 visitor parking stalls and the renovated east parking lot would provide 50 staff parking stalls. Within the west parking lot, site circulation would travel in a one-way counterclockwise loop. Within the east parking lot, traffic circulation would be provided two ways within the parking lot. Site circulation within these parking lots is shown in Figure 2. As part of the project, roadway frontage improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping would be required along S 300th Street, which could also require right-of-way dedication. All site driveway intersections would operate with a v/c ratio under 1.0 during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour with the project in 2020. Therefore, the West and East Driveways onto S 3001h Street do not meet minimum AASHTO entering sight distance requirements, but minimum stopping sight distance is provided for a 25 mph design speed and a downslope of 9 percent grade along S 3001h Street (in excess of 175 feet) that provides for a minimum level of safety. Due to sight distance issues at the project site driveways, the City of Federal Way has requested that roundabouts be installed at the West and East Driveways onto S 300th Street to minimize travel speeds on S 300th Street. Queuing Analysis and Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Loading Areas There are no existing queuing issues during the AM peak hour as vehicle arrivals and departures are staggered in the morning when students are dropped off before school begins and there are also adequate available loading area lengths on -site. Queuing issues on S 300th Street and internally within the site were primarily due to vehicles parking too close to the intersection or double parking on S 300th Street and preventing other vehicles from getting around them during the PM peak hour. At Intersection #2 — S 300th Street / 26th Avenue S / East Driveway, with the proposed redevelopment, queues during the AM peak hour are anticipated to be about 1 vehicle in the westbound direction and 2 vehicles in the eastbound direction during the AM peak hour and about 1 vehicle in the westbound and eastbound direction during the PM peak hour with the TTENW page 15 November 16, 2018 Federal Way School District- Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis project in 2020. There are no anticipated queuing issues at Intersection #3 - S 300th Street / 24th Place S / West Driveway. It should be noted that 95th percentile queue lengths for all stop -controlled movements at the site driveway intersections onto S 300th Street estimate queue lengths to be less than 50 feet or 2 vehicles during the AM and PM peak hour with the project in 2020. The redeveloped west parking lot would provide a loading area for up to 25 spots, 1 over its current 24 spot maximum for student pick-up/drop-offs. If student pickup/drop-offs are also provided in the southern section of the east parking lot, they would provide an additional 20 spots for a loading area. These loading areas for student pick-up/drop-offs would minimize impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. School Safe Walk Route Figure 8 shows safe walk routes within a 1-mile radius of Wildwood Elementary School. A crossing guard should be provided during school arrival and dismissal periods at the East Driveway onto S 3006 Street. There are no mitigation measures as students would be able to safely travel along sidewalks on S 300th Street and use crosswalks to provide access to the school. Project Mitigation A review of traffic impacts to intersection levels of service, site access, and circulation issues was conducted in association with the Wildwood Elementary School in Federal Way, WA. The following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce or eliminate project impacts: ➢ The City of Federal Way assesses a traffic impact fee rate of $2.00 per new square - foot of floor area for elementary schools (2018 Federal Way Impact Fee and Components). Based upon a net increase of 13,208 square feet (50,382 square feet existing and 63,590 square feet future), Mirror Lake Rementery School would be assessed a traffic impact fee of $26,416.00. The final fee would be determined at building permit issuance. ➢ The applicant would be required to construct the necessary frontage improvements along S 300th Street to include curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping, which could also include right-of-way donation. ➢ Install roundabouts at the East and West driveways onto S 300th Street per the City of Federal Way's request to minimize travel speeds on S 300th Street in order to meet minimum sight distance requirements. ➢ A crossing guard should be provided during school arrival and dismissal periods at the East Driveway onto S 300th Street. If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at (206) 361-7333 x 101 or mikereoditenw.com. VTENW page 16 November 16, 2018 Q Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 30011 Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 6 i:s �?',yrel>rlt: IMF k. l . .\ WiltlWpad Elementary School 9ktoml. , , v Legend •••••. walk Route Sidewalk or Shoulder with Raised Curb • • r . • walk Route: Shoulder Only • • • r • • Walk Roule: Little or No Shoulder Crosswalk Crossing Guard(s) Slop Sign Traffic Signal School Speed Zone Federal Way � TE N W Figure 8 School District School Safe Walk Route Wildwaad Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis Gd)TENW page 17 November 16, 2018 ATTACHMENT A Daily, AM & PM Peak Traffic Counts V TENW www.idaxdata.com 21 23RD AVE S WW_S 300TH ST Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour: 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM � N � N V) Q � �4 O C0 a0 CDN r• O p N S 300TH ST ,ice 13 0 �- 1 J TEV: 263 �14 81 n PHF: 0.76 54 * o o 27 =. „? 2� 1 S 300TH ST J J 152 0 0 � V V�d 6 t O C) 00 Go LI Co Q HV %: PHF o EB 6.9% 0.60co rn N WB 1.2% 0-53 n V n O NB 7.3% 0.59 SB 0.0% 0.85 TOTAL 4.2% 0.76 'Two -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST 23RD AVE S 23RD AVE S Interval 15-min Rolling Eastbound Westbound Northbound Souhbound Start Total One Hour UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 4 0 12 0 7:15AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 8 0 7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 2 0 14 0 7:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 6 4 0 33 67 8:00 AM 0 0 6 0 0 9 6 2 0 1 2 26 0 7 4 0 63 118 8:15 AM 0 0 12 0 0 13 2 3 0 2 1 43 0 6 4 0 86 196 8:30 AM 0 1 6 1 0 24 6 8 0 0 3 19 0 8 5 0 81 263 8:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 9 1 0 0 0 2 6 0 1 3 0 24 254 Count Total 0 1 30 3 0 65 16 13 0 3 17 118 0 28 27 0 321 0 Peak Hour 0 1 27 1 0 54 14 13 0 3 8 98 0 27 17 0 263 0 Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15AM D 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 5 8 8:15AM 2 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 8 8:30 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 845 AM 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 Count Total 2 4 10 0 16 1 1 0 0 2 6 2 9 6 23 Peak Hour 2 1 8 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8 6 20 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 22 WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY WWI S 300TH ST Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour: 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM C M o� N ul a� CD N N Cl) c) O O S 300TH ST 1 L o ❑ 5 TEV: 350 31 A o PHF: 0.73 28 * O > 19 9 Q ■ . 150 126 S 300TH ST� CD 3 IT N N 1 1 soA0 Y �� _. V [..�Q�OQG: O 3 HV %: PHF LU EB 5.3% 0.65 l!(Q m Cl) W WB 1 6% 0.67 NB 0.0% 0,48 SB 8 6% 0.55 TOTAL 3 4% 0.73 Two -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY 24TH PL S Interval 15-min Rolling Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Total One Hour UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 7:00 AM 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 0 7:15AM 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 9 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 13 0 7:45 AM 0 0 1 18 0 5 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 44 77 8:00 AM 0 1 5 32 0 11 11 1 0 6 3 2 0 0 5 1 78 144 8:15 AM 0 2 9 47 0 5 4 0 0 15 10 12 0 2 14 0 120 255 8:30 AM 0 2 4 29 1 7 4 1 0 32 9 13 0 0 5 1 108 350 8:45 AM 0 1 0 7 0 6 9 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 3 0 32 338 Count Total 0 6 23 148 1 1 36 43 4 0 56 1 23 27 0 6 40 2 415 0 Peak Hour 0 5 19 126 1 28 31 2 0 54 22 27 0 3 30 2 350 0 Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 1 1 7:15AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 6 8:15AM 6 0 0 3 9 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 9 0 8 17 8:30 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 8:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 Count Total 9 4 0 3 16 1 0 0 1 2 0 19 0 15 34 Peak Hour 8 1 0 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 12 30 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark. skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 23 WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY e&1 S 300TH ST 024 Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour: 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM o u� cn r Q G�4 m N M o S 300TH ST 0 l 0. 2 6 4-3- TEV: 139 37 � A � ' f - -A � 0 . o r 4> 40� PHF: 0.85 -= 0 10 00 S 300TH ST o N °A M O❑ F HV %: 0 13 PHF wEB 0 0% 0.55 w WB 0 0% 070 l!%Q a- NB 19.6% 061 SB 0.0% 050 TOTAL 6.5% 085 Two -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY 26TH AVE S Interval 15-min Rolling Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Total One Hour UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7:15AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 11 1 4 0 0 1 1 23 35 8:00 AM 0 1 5 0 0 0 14 0 0 9 3 7 0 0 0 1 40 72 8:15 AM 0 0 20 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 4 1 0 3 0 2 41 109 8:30 AM 0 3 15 0 0 0 9 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 2 35 139 8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 10 3 2 0 1 0 0 1 23 1 139 Count Total 0 4 44 0 0 0 47 3 0 34 12 18 1 0 4 1 7 174 0 Peak Hour 0 4 40 0 0 0 37 2 0 22 9 15 0 3 1 6 139 0 Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7:15AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 8 8:15AM 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 3 10 8:30 AM 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 7 8:45 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 1 0 12 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 2 15 27 Peak Hour 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 2 13 25 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 21 23RD AVE S ' S 300TH ST Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 2:00 PM to 6:00 PM Peak Hour: 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM M N M N U f Q V�U ti af cM o O o NL l UrIIl11 0 1� 0 TEV: 179 11 9 F— �3 A24 0 ' � ' 0 PHF: 0.66 43 "' N 4Q 1> 15 S 300TH STn .►0 3 n i o Ln _ 40 0~� 4 F HV %: PHF EB 15.8% 0.59 WB 12 7% 0 46 NB 4 5% 0.72 SB 0.0% 0.86 TOTAL 7.8% 066 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST 23RD AVE S 23RD AVE S Interval Start 15-min Total Rolling One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 3 6 0 5 4 0 26 0 2:45 PM 0 0 6 2 0 5 0 1 0 1 6 16 0 2 5 0 44 0 3:00 PM 0 0 4 1 0 23 6 5 0 2 3 15 0 5 4 0 68 0 3:15 PM 1 0 0 3 1 1 0 11 3 4 1 0 1 5 7 1 0 2 4 0 41 179 Peak Hour 1 0 0 15 4 1 0 43 9 11 1 0 5 17 44 0 14 17 0 179 0 Note: For all three-hour count summary, see next page. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Start EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total 2:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 9 3:00 PM 2 7 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 15 0 35 3:15PM 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 5 4 16 Peak Hour 1 3 8 3 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 29 3 24 4 60 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 21 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST 23RD AVE S 23RD AVE S Interval Start 15-min Total Rolling One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 3 5 0 1 2 1 18 0 2:15PM 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 5 0 0 4 0 19 0 2:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 3 6 0 5 4 0 26 0 2:45 PM 0 0 6 2 0 5 0 1 0 1 6 16 0 2 5 0 44 107 3:00 PM 0 0 4 1 0 23 6 5 0 2 3 15 0 5 4 0 68 157 3:15 PM 0 0 3 1 0 11 3 4 0 1 5 7 0 2 4 0 41 179 3:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 2 0 0 3 2 0 1 1 1 17 170 3:45 PM 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 7 0 20 146 4:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 2 0 15 93 4:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 7 3 0 1 1 5 1 0 1 1 0 21 73 4:30 PM 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 2 0 16 72 4:45 PM 0 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 3 0 16 68 5:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 _ 1 0 0 0 10 13 0 0 4 1 36 89 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 4 14 0 2 4 0 33 101 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 4 8 0 0 6 0 23 108 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 17 109 Count Total 0 4 23 9 0 82 22 15 2 11 72 107 1 19 60 3 430 0 Peak Hour 0 0 15 4 0 43 9 11 0 5 17 44 0 14 17 0 179 0 .Note: Four-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossin Leg) Start EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total 2:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 9 3:00 PM 2 7 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 15 0 35 3:15PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 5 4 16 3:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 13 4:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Count Total 6 9 5 0 20 2 0 1 0 3 41 3 30 6 80 Peak Hour 3 8 3 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 29 3 24 4 60 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 22 WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY S 300TH STUfa), Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 2:00 PM to 6:00 PM Peak Hour: 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM N M M co a d�Q x N n ao 0 0 1 (.0, U 5 300TH 57 1 Lo 0 12 10 TEV: 198 29 59 Fl 8 o ' • AB� 21 PHF: 0.52 17 38 IL1 43 S 300TH ST n ii r (• `�° " O 0 10 o moo_ C N r Op Cr F HV %: PHF w EB 8 7% 0.75 WB W NB 15.3% 0.0% 0.51 0.31 SB 11.5% 0.81 TOTAL 9.1 % 0.52 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY 24TH PL S Interval Start 15-min Total Rolling One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:30 PM 0 0 4 9 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 29 0 2:45 PM 0 2 10 7 1 3 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 4 2 35 0 3:00 PM 0 5 6 12 0 5 15 9 0 13 11 11 0 5 3 0 95 0 3:15 PM 1 0 3 1 10 11 0 5 9 2 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 39 1 198 Peak Hour 1 0 10 21 38 1 1 17 29 12 0 20 11 13 1 0 8 11 7 1 198 1 0 Note: For all three-hour count summary, see next page. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Start EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total 2:30 PM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 6 2:45PM 1 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 9 3:00 PM 3 7 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 7 6 63 3:15PM 1 1 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 5 Peak Hour 1 6 9 0 3 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 64 8 10 83 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 22 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY 24TH PL S Interval Start 15-min Total Rolling One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:00 PM 0 2 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 2:15PM 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 2:30 PM 0 0 4 9 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 29 0 2:45 PM 0 2 10 7 1 3 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 4 2 35 86 3:00 PM 0 5 6 12 0 5 15 9 0 13 11 11 0 5 3 0 95 170 3:15 PM 0 3 1 10 0 5 9 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 2 39 198 3:30 PM 0 0 2 3 0 1 4 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 182 3:45 PM 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 152 4:00 PM 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 9 66 4:15 PM 0 2 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 18 45 4:30 PM 0 1 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 14 46 4:45 PM 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 14 55 5:00 PM 0 0 4 10 1 5 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 28 74 5:15 PM 0 1 4 11 1 10 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 39 95 5:30 PM 0 1 1 6 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 17 98 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 91 Count Total 0 20 39 83 4 41 66 16 0 33 17 21 0 12 19 13 384 0 Peak Hour 0 10 21 38 1 17 29 12 0 20 11 13 0 8 11 7 198 0 Note: Four-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 2:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 2:30 PM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 6 2:45 PM 1 1 0 2 4 D 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 9 3:00 PM 3 7 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 7 6 63 3:15PM 1 1 0 Q 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 3:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 7 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 Count Total 10 10 0 3 23 0 0 0 1 1 2 77 12 12 103 Peak Hour 6 9 0 3 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 64 8 10 83 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 23 WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY wa)_ S 300TH ST Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 2:00 PM to 6:00 PM Peak Hour: 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM p N � N fn T 110 Q 2 r p r, p N __: s• S 300TH ST O 6 0 12 TEV: 141 9 ♦— 30 4 A 10 o • 0 o PHF: 0.48 — 0 a " A o_ 51 39 1-0 0 57O S 300TH ST i 0 ~ V } f HV %: PHF EB 0.0% 0.40w WB 26% 061 iV N p Cl) NB 34.4% 0.53 SB 0 0% 0.34 TOTAL 8.5% 0.48 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY 26TH AVE S Interval Start 15-min Total Rolling One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:30 PM 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 19 0 2:45 PM 0 6 2 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 0 3:00 PM 0 4 28 0 0 0 14 2 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 10 74 0 3:15 PM 0 1 4 0 0 0 6 2 0 9 1 5 0 2 0 0 30 141 Peak Hour 0 12 39 0 0 0 30 9 0 20 1 11 0 7 0 12 141 0 ,Vote: For all three-hour count summary, see next page Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2:45PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 2 14 3:00 PM 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 34 1 9 8 52 3:15PM 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 6 Peak Hour 1 0 1 11 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 47 3 10 14 74 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 23 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY 26TH AVE S Interval 15-min Rolling Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Total One Hour UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:00 PM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2:15PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 2:30 PM 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 19 0 2:45 PM 0 6 2 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 49 3:00 PM 0 4 28 0 0 0 14 2 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 10 74 119 3:15 PM 0 1 4 0 0 0 6 2 0 9 1 5 0 2 0 0 30 141 3:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 1 3 0 1 0 0 13 135 3:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 120 4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 51 4:15 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 11 32 4:30 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 13 32 4:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 39 5:00 PM 1 3 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 2 2 4 0 1 0 2 22 56 5:15 PM 0 2 1 0 0 0 11 1 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 25 70 5:30 PM 0 1 2 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 12 69 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9 68 Count Total 2 19 56 0 1 1 72 14 0 44 7 32 0 12 0 16 276 0 Peak Hour 0 12 39 0 0 0 30 9 0 20 1 11 0 7 0 12 141 0 Note: Four-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Start EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2:45PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 2 14 3:00 PM 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 34 1 9 8 52 3:15PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 6 3:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 6 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 1 13 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 47 7 12 22 88 Peak Hour 0 1 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 47 3 10 14 74 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6112/2018-611812018 Site Code: 06 i&c.", DATA SOLUTIONS Tuesday _ _ Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 6/1212018 6113/2018 6/14/2018 611612018 6116/2018 SF1712016 611&2018 Mid -Week AvenW Time EB WB Total EB WB Total ES WB Total E8 WB Total ES WB Total EB WB Total EB Will Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 2 2 1:00 AM 0 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 3:00 AM 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 4:00 AM 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 3 5 1 2 3 5:00 AM 4 3 7 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 2 5 6:00 AM 4 9 13 4 3 7 3 3 6 4 - 11 7:00 AM 5 27 32 9 32 41 6 29 35 7 29 36 8:00 AM 44 82 126 33 76 109 43 78 121 40 79 119 9:00 AM 4 20 24 1 13 14 1 26 27 2 20 22 10:00 AM 11 16 27 4 12 16 3 19 22 6 16 22 11:00 AM 3 47 50 4 18 22 6 34 40 4 33 37 12:00 PM 10 35 45 11 21 32 6 23 29 9 26 35 1:00 PM 9 18 27 4 25 29 4 16 22 6 20 26 2:00 PM 19 30 49 9 35 44 19 27 46 16 31 46 3:00 PM 32 75 107 29 67 96 40 62 102 34 68 102 4:00 PM 12 20 32 10 32 42 8 24 32 10 25 35 5:00 PM 8 56 64 11 36 47 7 7 14 9 33 42 6:00 PM 15 35 50 12 25 37 7 8 15 11 23 34 7:00 PM 4 13 17 6 23 29 6 7 13 5 14 20 8:00 PM 6 4 10 1 9 10 4 3 7 4 5 9 9:00 PM 2 a 10 1 6 7 5 10 15 3 8 11 10:00 PM 4 4 8 1 4 5 2 2 4 2 3 6 11:00 PM 2 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 Total 201 509 710 155 442 597 178 390 SU 178 447 625 IPercern 28% 72% 26% 74% 31% 69% 28% 72% 1 Mid -week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark skaggs@idaxdata corn Vehicle Speed Report Summary Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Count Direction: Eastbound / Westbound Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 kka)"', DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) Total 0-10 10 -15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 60 - 65 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75.80 80 - 85 85 a Volume Study Total (Eastbound Percent 31 5.8 % 113 21.2 % 216 40.4 % 153 28.7 % 21 3.9 % 0 0.0 % 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 534 100% 'Westbound Percent 21 1.6% 215 16.0% 627 46.8% 420 31.3% 56 4.2% 2 0.1 % 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,341 100% Total (Percent 52 28% 328 17.5% 843 45.0% 573 30.6% 77 4.1% 2 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0 00% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1,875 100% Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics Eastbound Eastbound 50th Percentile (Median) 18.0 mph Mean (Average) Speed 17.7 mph 85th Percentile 22.3 mph 10 mph Pace 12.3 - 22.3 mph 95th Percentile 24.7 mph Percent in Pace 74.2 % Westbound Westbound 50th Percentile (Median) 18.7 mph Mean (Average) Speed 18.6 mph 85th Percentile 22.3 mph 10 mph Pace 13.4 - 23.4 mph 95th Percentile 24.5 mph I Percent in Pace 80-8 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6114/2018 Site Code: 08 Tuesday, June 12, 2018 Eastbound eai� DATA SOLUTIONS S Range m is Total Time 0-10 10. 15 15 - 20 20.25 24 - 30 30 - 35 36.40 40 - 45 46. 60 50 - 65 65.40 60 - 6S 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 A:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6:00 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 AM 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8'00 AM 1 5 29 9 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 9:00 AM 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10:00 AM 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11:00 AM 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:00 PM 0 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1:00PM 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ZOO PM 3 6 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 3.00 PM 12 9 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 A00PM 1 2 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 5:00 PM 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6100 PM 1 4 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 7:00 PM 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 600 PM 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 6 9:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:00 PM 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 20 36 84 51 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 Aercent 10.0% 17,51A 41.8% 26A% 5.0% 0.0% DAY. 0,0% 0.0% 0,0% 0.0% D.0% 0.0% 0.0% &0% OA% D.014 Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 17.8 mph Mean (Average) Speed 17.4 ]mph85th Percentile 226 mph 10 mph Pace 131 -231 95th Percentile 25.0 mph Percent in Pace 71.1 Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Tuesday, June 12, 2018 Westbound wa), DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) Total Time 0-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 46-50 50-65 55-60 60-65 66-70 70-76 76-80 80-86 86+ Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 AM 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 7:00 AM 0 4 10 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 27 8:00 AM 1 12 46 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 9:00 AM 1 3 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10:00 AM 0 1 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 11:00 AM 0 3 29 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 12:00 PM 3 9 17 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 35 1:00 PM 0 4 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 2:00 PM 0 5 16 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 :3:00 PM 1 22 48 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 •4:00 PM 0 2 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 5:00 PM 3 4 34 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 13:00 PM 1 16 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 7:00 PM 0 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13:00 PM 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13:00 PM 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10:00 PM 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11100 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 10 86 266 131 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 509 Percent 2.0% 16.9% 52.3% 25.7% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.011. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GA% O.O h Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed 5tatlsUcs 50th Percentile (Median) 18.6 mph Mean (Average) Speed =4h 85th Percentile 21.9 mph 10 mph Pace 13 95th Percentile 24.3 mph Percent in Pace Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Eastbound ula), DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) _ _ _ _ Total Time 0-10 10. 15 15 -20 20 • 25 25. 30 30.35 35.40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 56 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 76 75 - 80 80 - 85 86 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 d.00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:OOAM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:OD AM 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 AM 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8 00 AM 1 9 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 9.00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 AM 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 4 12:00PM 0 2 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1:00 PM 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2.00 PM 1 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 3:00 PM 1 10 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 4:00 PM 0 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5:00 PM 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5!0D PM 0 0 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 7:00 PM 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 800 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 1 9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 3 31 61 56 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 Percent 1.9% 20.0% 39.4% 36.5% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Co% 0.01/. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.4 mph Mean (Average) Speed 18.4 mph 85th Percentile 22 2 mph 10 mph Pace 12.9 - 22.9 mph 95th Percentile 24.2 mph Percent in Pace 81 9 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 611212018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Westbound WWI DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Ran (mph) Total Time 0-10 10-IS 15.20 20.25 25.30 30.35 36.40 40-46 45-50 SO.55 55-60 60-66 66-70 70.76 76-80 80.46 85+ Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2.00AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6-00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 600AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7-00 AM 0 3 17 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 8 00 AM 1 16 34 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 900 AM 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10:00AM 1 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 11:00 AM 1 4 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 12:01) PM 0 1 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 1:00 PM 0 6 10 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 2:00 PM 0 6 16 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 3-00 PM 1 13 31 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 4:00 PM 0 2 6 19 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 5100 PM 0 0 5 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 00 PM 0 2 9 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 25 7:00 PM 1 0 8 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 8:00PM 0 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9:00PM 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10 00 PM 0 1 0 2 1 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 1 Total 6 66 180 175 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 442 Percent 1.1% 12.7% 40.T% 39.6% 6.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0A% 0.0% "% DA% 0.0% *A% D.D% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary I Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 19 7 mph Mean (Average) Speed 19.3 mph 85th Percentile 22.8 mph 10 mph Pace 14.5 - 24.5 mph I 95th Percentile 25.5 mph Percent in Pace 81 9 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata corn Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/1212018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Thursday, June 14, 2018 Eastbound idw- DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) _ Total Tlme 0-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-55 55-60 60-66 65-70 70-75 75-80 80-86 86+ Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 AM 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7:00 AM 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 AM 4 7 23 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 9:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:00 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:00 AM 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:00 PM 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1:00 PM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 4 2:00 PM 1 7 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 3:00 PM 1 19 15 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 4:00 PM 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5:00 PM 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 7 6:00 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7:00 PM 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 �9:00 PM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 4 ,9:00 PM 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10:00 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11100 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 1 'total 6 46 71 47 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 IPercent 4.6% 25.8% 39.9% 26.41/6 3.41/6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 17.4 mph Mean (Average) Speed 17 5 mph 85th Percentile 22 1 mph 10 mph Pace 12.0 - 22.0 mph 95th Percentile 248 mph Percent in Pace 73.6 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6112/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Thursday, June 14, 2018 Westbound WWI DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) Total Time 0.10 10.15 15 - 20 20.26 26 - 30 30 - 36 35 - 40 40 - 46 46 - 50 50 - 65 65 - 60 60 - 66 65 - 70 70 - 76 76 - 80 80 - 86 86 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 •5:00 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7:00 AM 1 0 10 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 B:00 AM 3 16 34 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 '9:00 AM 0 6 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 10:00 AM 0 1 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 11:00 AM 1 9 17 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 12:00 PM 0 8 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1:00 PM 1 4 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 '2:00 PM 0 6 11 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 :3:00 PM 0 15 33 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 4:00 PM 0 1 15 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 5:00 PM 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6:00 PM 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7:00 PM 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8:00 PM 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3:00 PM 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10:00 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 E1 6 73 181 114 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 390 Percent 1.6% 18.7% 46.4% 29.2% 3.8% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0°/. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.4 mph Mean (Average) Speed 18.3 mph 85th Percentile 22.1 mph 10 mph Pace 12.8 - 22.8 mph 95th Percentile 24.4 mph Percent in Pace 82.56 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 ma rk. s kaggs@ idaxdata.co m Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/1412018 Site Code: 08 Total Study Average Eastbound U120, . DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) _ Total Time 0-10 10 -15 15.20 20 - 25 25.30 _ 30 - 35 36.40 40.45 45 -60 50. 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 66 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4.00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00AM 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7;00 AM 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 00 AM 2 7 22 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 9:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:00 AM 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:00AM 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1200 PM 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1:00 PM 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2100 PM 2 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 3:00 PM 5 13 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 400PM 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 5'00 PM 0 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6100 PM 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 TOO PM 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5:00 PM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 100 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:00PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 It 1:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 10 37 71 50 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 Percent 6.0% 21.6% 41.6% 29.2% 1.8% DA% 0-0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% Note: Average only condsidered on days w@h 24-hours of data Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.0 mph Mean (Average) Speed 17 7 mph 85th Percentile 22.3 mph 10 mph Pace 12 3 - 22.3 mph 95th Percentile 24 7 mph Percent in Pace 742 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark skaggs@idaxdata corn Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/1212018 to 6/1412018 Site Code: 08 Total Study Average Westbound WWI DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) Total Time 0-10 10-15 15-20 20-26 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 50-56 55-60 60-66 65-70 70-76 75-80 80-86 86+ Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6:00 AM 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7:00 AM 0 2 12 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 8:00 AM 2 15 38 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 9:00 AM 0 3 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 10:00 AM 0 1 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 11:00 AM 1 5 19 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 12:00 PM 1 6 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1:00 PM 0 5 10 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 2:00 PM 0 6 14 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 3:00 PM 1 17 37 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 4:00 PM 0 2 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 5:00 PM 1 2 14 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 5:00 PM 0 6 6 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 7:00PM 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8:00 PM 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9:00 PM 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10:00PM 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 6 72 207 141 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 445 Percent 1.3% 16.2% 46.63E 31.7% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.09/6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Note: Average only con dsidered on days with 24-hours of data Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Seed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.7 mphj Mean (Average) Speed 18.6 mph 85th Percentile 22.3 mph 10 mph Pace 13.4 - 23.4 mph 95th Percentile 24.5 mph 1 Percent in Pace 80.8 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark skaggs@idaxdata com ATTACHMENT B Intersection LOS Summary Sheets T TENW HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR VVBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations � Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 27 1 54 14 13 3 8 98 27 17 0 Future Vol, veh1h 1 27 1 54 14 13 3 8 98 27 17 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 1 1 1 7 7 7 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1 36 1 71 18 17 4 11 129 36 22 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NS SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB _ Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.8 8.1 7.6 7.9 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLnl EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 3% 67% 61 % Vol Thru, % 7% 93%a 17% 39% Vol Right, % 90% 3% 16% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 109 29 81 44 LT Vol 3 1 54 27 Through Vol 8 27 14 17 RT Vol 98 1 13 0 Lane Flow Rate 143 38 107 58 Geofietry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.155 0.048 0.131 0.072 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.887 4.554 4.437 4.5 Convergence, YIN Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 926 789 813 799 Service Time 1.896 2.566 2.437 2.512 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.154 0.048 0.132 0.073 HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.8 8.1 7.9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2- West Drivewa /24th PI S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBL. EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4r 4� +T+ +Tr Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 19 126 29 31 2 54 22 27 3 30 2 Future Vol, veh/h 5 19 126 29 31 2 54 22 27 3 30 2 Conflicting Peds, Whr 18 0 30 12 0 0 30 0 12 0 0 18 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % 3 -10 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 2 2 2 0 0 0 9 9 9 Mvmt Flow 7 26 173 40 42 3 74 30 37 4 41 3 Major/Minor Ma_jorl Ma or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 63 0 0 229 0 0 333 300 155 314 385 92 Stage - - 157 157 - 142 142 - Stage 2 - - 176 143 - 172 243 - Critical Hdwy 4.15 4.12 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.19 6.59 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - 2.218 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.581 4.081 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1521 1339 - 624 616 896 625 538 946 Stage 1 - - - 850 772 - 844 766 Stage 2 - - - 831 782 - 814 692 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1498 1306 539 570 865 544 498 909 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 539 570 - 544 498 - Stage 1 - 825 749 - 827 731 Stage 2 - 739 746 - 737 671 - Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 3.7 12.7 12.7 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 606 1498 1306 515 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.233 0.005 - 0.03 - 0.093 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 7.4 0 7.8 0 12.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0 - 0.1 - 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Driveway/26th Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41� 44 +T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 40 0 0 37 2 22 9 15 3 1 6 Future Vol, veh/h 4 40 0 0 37 2 22 9 15 3 1 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 0 14 22 0 11 14 0 22 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None None - None Storage Length - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - -10 - - 10 - -3 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 47 0 0 44 2 26 11 18 4 1 7 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 57 0 0 69 0 0 142 136 91 150 135 70 Stage 1 - - 79 79 - 56 56 - Stage 2 63 57 - 94 79 Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 6.7 6.1 6.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.7 5.1 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.7 5.1 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 3.68 4.18 3.48 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1560 1545 807 739 926 822 760 998 Stage - - - 899 806 961 852 Stage 2 - - 914 821 918 833 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - 1517 775 717 892 774 737 977 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 775 717 - 774 737 - Stage 1 880 789 949 844 - Stage 2 896 814 - 869 816 - Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 9.9 9.2 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 796 1546 1517 879 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 0.003 - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.9 7.3 0 0 9.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th °/stile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - 0 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 1- 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR 1NBL VVST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41� 4� 411� 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 15 4 43 9 11 5 17 44 14 17 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 15 4 43 9 11 5 17 44 14 17 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 16 16 16 13 13 13 5 5 5 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 23 6 65 14 17 8 26 67 21 26 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Banes left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.6 8.1 7.4 7.6 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLnl WBLnl SBLn1 Vol Left, % 8% 0% 68% 45% Vol Thru, % 26% 79% 14°% 55% Vol Right, % 67% 21 % 17% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 66 19 63 31 LT Vol 5 0 43 14 Through Vol 17 15 9 17 RT Vol 44 4 11 0 Lane Flow Rate 100 29 95 47 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.107 0.035 0.117 0.056 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.853 4.316 4.431 4.285 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 914 806 801 822 Service Time 1.945 2.468 2.501 2.382 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.109 0.036 0.119 0.057 HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.6 8.1 7.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2- West Driveway/24th PI S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 4, *T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 21 38 18 29 12 20 11 13 8 11 7 Future Vol, veh/h 10 21 38 18 29 12 20 11 13 8 11 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 72 0 74 11 0 9 74 0 11 9 0 72 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 3 - -10 - - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 9 9 15 15 15 0 0 0 12 12 12 Mvmt Flow 19 40 73 35 56 23 38 21 25 15 21 13 Maior/Minor Ma'orl Maior2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 151 0 0 187 0 0 418 410 162 359 435 214 Stage 1 - - - - - - 189 189 210 210 - Stage 2 - - 229 221 149 225 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 4.25 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.22 6.62 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.22 5.62 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 6.22 5.62 Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 2.335 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.608 4.108 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1388 1313 - 549 534 888 578 500 801 Stage 1 - - - 817 748 - 770 710 - Stage 2 - - 778 724 - 830 699 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1305 - 1232 440 450 826 486 421 707 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 440 450 - 486 421 - Stage 1 - 754 690 712 648 - Stage 2 - 672 660 761 645 - Approach E8 WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 2.4 13.4 13.1 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 514 1305 1232 495 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.165 0.015 0.028 - 0.101 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.4 7.8 0 8 0 13.1 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - 0.1 - 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3- East Drivewa /26th Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *14 *Tr 44 4+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 39 0 0 30 9 20 1 11 7 0 12 Future Vol, veh/h 12 39 0 0 30 9 20 1 11 7 0 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 13 0 17 61 0 57 17 0 61 57 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None None None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - -10 - 10 - -3 0 - Peak Hour Factor 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 3 3 34 34 34 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 25 81 0 0 63 19 42 2 23 15 0 25 Ma or/Minor Ma'orl Ma'or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 139 0 0 142 0 0 294 331 203 335 322 147 Stage 1 - - - - - 192 192 - 130 130 - Stage 2 - 102 139 - 205 192 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.13 6.84 6.24 6.24 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.84 5.24 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.84 5.24 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.227 3.806 4.306 3.606 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1457 1435 629 570 776 622 599 905 Stage - - 765 708 - 878 792 - Stage 2 - - 846 741 - 802 745 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1388 1362 563 506 699 534 531 850 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 563 506 - 534 531 - Stage 1 712 659 - 820 755 - Stage 2 809 706 - 720 694 - Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 117 10.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 601 1388 1362 698 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.111 0.018 - 0.057 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.7 7.6 0 0 10.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - 0 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4� r 41� *T+ Traffic Vol, vehlh 1 29 1 57 15 14 3 8 104 29 18 0 Future Vol, veh/h 1 29 1 57 15 14 3 8 104 29 18 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 076 0.76 0.76 0.76 076 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 076 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 1 1 1 7 7 7 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1 38 1 75 20 18 4 11 137 38 24 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.9 8.2 7.7 7.9 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLnl EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 3% 66% 62% Vol Thru, % 7% 94% 17% 38% Vol Right, % 90% 3% 16% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 115 31 86 47 LT Vol 3 1 57 29 Through Vol 8 29 15 18 RT Vol 104 1 14 0 Lane Flow Rate 151 41 113 62 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.165 0.052 0.14 0.078 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.914 4.591 4.455 4.535 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 920 782 807 792 Service Time 1.923 2.607 2.469 2.548 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 0.052 0.14 0.078 HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.9 8.2 7.9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/02/2018 2020 Baseline AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: West Driveway/24th PI S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations fl� +1 r 4 41 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 20 134 31 33 2 57 23 29 3 32 2 Future Vol, veh/h 5 20 134 31 33 2 57 23 29 3 32 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 30 12 0 0 30 0 12 0 0 18 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 0 - Grade, % - 3 - -10 - 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 2 2 2 0 0 0 9 9 9 Mvmt Flow 7 27 184 42 45 3 78 32 40 4 44 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 66 0 0 241 0 0 347 313 161 330 404 95 Stage 1 - - - - - - 163 163 - 149 149 Stage 2 - - 184 150 - 181 255 - Critical Hdwy 4.15 4.12 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.19 6.59 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - 2.218 3.5 4 3.3 3.581 4.081 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1517 1326 611 606 889 610 525 943 Stage - 844 767 - 837 761 - Stage 2 - 822 777 - 805 684 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1494 - 1293 524 560 858 528 485 906 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 524 560 - 528 485 - Stage 1 - 819 744 - 820 724 Stage 2 - 726 740 - 724 663 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 3.7 13.1 13 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 594 1494 1293 501 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.251 0.005 0.033 - 0.101 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.1 7.4 0 7.9 0 13 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th °/stile Q(veh) 1 0 - 0.1 - 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/02/2018 2020 Baseline AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Driveway/26th Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + + + Traffic Vol. vehih 4 42 0 0 39 2 23 10 16 3 1 6 Future Vol, veh/h 4 42 0 0 39 2 23 10 16 3 1 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 0 14 22 0 11 14 0 22 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median_ Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - -10 - - 10 - - -3 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 49 0 0 46 2 27 12 19 4 1 7 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 59 0 0 71 0 0 146 140 93 155 139 72 Stage 1 - - - 81 81 - 58 58 - Stage 2 - - 65 59 - 97 81 - Cn`tical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - 6.7 6.1 6.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.7 5.1 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.7 5.1 - 6.1 - 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - 3.68 4.18 3.48 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1558 - 1542 - 803 736 924 816 756 996 Stage - - - 897 805 - 959 851 - Stage 2 - - - - 912 820 - 914 832 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1544 - 1514 771 714 890 765 733 975 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 771 714 - 765 733 - Stage 1 - - 878 788 - 941 843 Stage 2 894 813 - 863 815 Approach EB VVB NB SB HCM Control Delay. s 0-6 0 9-9 9-2 HCM LOS A A Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WST WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 793 1544 - 1514 874 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.073 0.003 - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay ts) 9.9 7.3 0 0 9.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - 0 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/02/2018 2020 Baseline AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +1 r +1� 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 16 4 46 10 12 5 18 47 15 18 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 16 4 46 10 12 5 18 47 15 18 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.66 0.66 066 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 16 16 16 13 13 13 5 5 5 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 24 6 70 15 18 8 27 71 23 27 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.7 8.2 7.5 7.7 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 7% 0% 68% 45% Vol Thru, % 26% 80% 15% 55% Vol Right, % 67% 20% 18% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 70 20 68 33 LT Vol 5 0 46 15 Through Vol 18 16 10 18 RT Vol 47 4 12 0 Lane Flow Rate 106 30 103 50 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.117 0.038 0.127 0.061 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.968 4.505 4.443 4.413 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 908 798 796 816 Service Time 1.971 2.513 2.53 2.418 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.117 0.038 0.129 0.061 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.7 8.2 7.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile 0 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2020 Baseline PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2- West Drivewa /24th PI S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 5.9 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41* *1� +T+ 4 Traffic Vol, vehlh 11 22 40 19 31 13 21 12 14 8 12 7 Future Vol, veh/h 11 22 40 19 31 13 21 12 14 8 12 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 72 0 74 11 0 9 74 0 11 9 0 72 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None None - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - 3 -10 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 9 9 15 15 15 0 0 0 12 12 12 Mvmt Flow 21 42 77 37 60 25 40 23 27 15 23 13 Major/Minor Majorl _ Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 157 0 0 193 0 0 436 428 166 378 454 219 Stage 1 - - - - 197 197 - 219 219 - Stage 2 - - - 239 231 - 159 235 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 4-25 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.22 6.62 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 6.22 5.62 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 6.22 5.62 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 2.335 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.608 4.108 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1381 1306 - 534 522 884 562 487 796 Stage 1 - - - 809 742 - 761 704 - Stage 2 - - - 769 717 820 692 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - 1225 425 438 822 468 409 702 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 425 438 - 468 409 - Stage 1 746 684 703 641 - Stage 2 - - 660 652 746 638 - Approach EB WB NB SS _ HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 24 13.8 13.4 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 501 1298 - 1225 479 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.18 0.016 - 0.03 - 0.108 HCM Control Delay (s) '13-8 7.8 0 - 8 0 13.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.1 - 0.1 - 0.4 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2020 Baseline PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3- East Driveway/26th Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41� +T+ +T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 41 0 0 32 10 21 1 12 7 0 13 Future Vol, veh/h 13 41 0 0 32 10 21 1 12 7 0 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 13 0 17 61 0 57 17 0 61 57 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None None None - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 0 0 Grade, % - -10 - 10 - -3 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 3 3 34 34 34 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 27 85 0 0 67 21 44 2 25 15 0 27 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 145 0 0 146 0 0 308 345 207 349 335 152 Stage 1 - - - - - - 200 200 - 135 135 - Stage 2 - - - 108 145 - 214 200 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.13 - 6.84 6.24 6.24 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.84 5.24 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.84 5.24 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.227 - 3.806 4.306 3.606 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1450 - 1430 - 617 561 772 609 589 900 Stage 1 - 759 703 873 789 - Stage 2 - - 840 737 793 739 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1381 - 1357 550 496 696 521 521 845 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 550 496 - 521 521 - Stage 1 705 653 - 814 752 - Stage 2 802 702 - 708 687 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 11.9 10.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 592 1381 1357 694 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.12 0.02 - - 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.9 7.7 0 0 10.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - 0 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2020 Baseline PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.2 Intersection LOS A Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU VVBL WBT bVBR NBU NIBL NBT NBR Vol, veh/h 0 1 34 1 0 75 19 18 0 3 8 125 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.92 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.92 0.76 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 7 7 7 2 1 1 1 2 7 7 7 Mvmt Flow 0 1 45 1 0 99 25 24 0 4 11 164 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach ES WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SIB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.1 8.6 8 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 2% 3% 67% 65% Vol Thru, % 6% 94% 17% 35% Vol Right, % 92% 3% 16% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 136 36 112 52 LT Vol 3 1 75 34 Through Vol 8 34 19 18 RT Vol 125 1 18 0 Lane Flow Rate 179 47 147 68 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.2 0.062 0.186 0.089 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.016 4.718 4.546 4.678 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 895 760 790 767 Service Time 2.033 2.744 2.569 2.7 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.2 0.062 0.186 0.089 HCM Control Delay 8 8.1 8.6 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile 0 0.7 0.2 0.7 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/2/2018 2020 Project AM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement -E•'_ .-_• L 'E. -1 Vol, veh/h 0 34 18 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.76 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 45 24 0 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 11/16/2018 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 8.2 HCM LOS A Lane Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/2/2018 2020 Project AM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 Roundabout 2: West Driveway/24th PI S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Approach 5.6 A EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 260 99 190 58 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 273 101 190 63 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 106 155 47 208 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 165 82 332 48 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 30 12 30 18 Ped Cap Adj 0.996 0.998 0.996 0.998 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.5 4.8 5.0 4.9 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Ll_ it Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 273 101 190 63 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1016 968 1078 918 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.953 0.980 1.000 0.927 Flow Entry, veh/h 260 99 190 58 Cap Entry, veh/h 965 947 1074 848 V/C Ratio 0.270 0.105 0.177 0.069 Control Delay, s/veh 6.5 4.8 5.0 4.9 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 0 1 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/2/2018 2020 Project AM LOS TENW Synchro 8 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Roundabout 3: East Drivewax/26th Ave S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 4.2 Intersection LOS A Approach EB W8 N8 SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 64 64 76 16 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 64 64 92 16 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 22 62 62 102 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 96 92 24 24 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 14 22 22 11 Ped Cap Adj 0.998 0.997 0.997 0.998 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.8 3.9 4.9 3.7 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 64 64 92 16 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1105 1062 1062 1020 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 1.000 0.828 1.000 Flow Entry, veh/h 64 64 76 16 Cap Entry, veh/h 1103 1059 877 1019 WC Ratio 0.058 0.060 0.087 0.016 Control Delay, s/veh 3.8 3.9 4.9 3.7 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 0 0 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/2/2018 2020 Project AM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 4 L HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBLi VlBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh/h 0 0 18 4 0 57 12 14 0 5 18 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.66 0.66 0.66 092 0.66 0.66 0.66 092 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 16 16 16 2 13 13 13 2 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 0 0 27 6 0 86 18 21 0 8 27 85 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach EB vVB NB Opposing Approach WB EB SIB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.8 8.4 7.6 HCM LOS A A A Lane N81- 1 EB1.n 1 WBLn1 SBLn 1 Vol Left, % 6% 0% 69% 49% Vol Thru, % 23% 82% 14% 51% Vol Right, % 71 % 18% 17% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 79 22 83 35 LT Vol 5 0 57 17 Through Vol 18 18 12 18 RT Vol 56 4 14 0 Lane Flow Rate 120 33 126 53 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.133 0.042 0.157 0.066 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.014 4.581 4.581 4.501 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 898 784 787 800 Service Time 2.018 2.593 2.581 2.506 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.134 0.042 0.16 0.066 HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.8 8.4 7.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 6/19/2018 2020 Project PM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersecton Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Vol, veh/h 0 17 18 0 Peak Hour Factor 092 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 26 27 0 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 7.8 HCM LOS A Lane Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 6/19/2018 2020 Project PM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 Roundabout 2: West Driveway/24th PI S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Inter>;f'I'Ii:)[I Intersection Delay, s/veh 5.3 Intersection LOS A Approach E B VVB N6 SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 169 128 123 55 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 184 148 123 62 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 91 117 92 186 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 157 98 183 79 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 74 11 74 72 Ped Cap Adj 0.990 0.998 0.990 0.990 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.6 5.6 4.6 5.0 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, vehlh 184 148 123 62 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1032 1005 1031 938 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.917 0.866 1.000 0.884 Flow Entry, vehlh 169 128 123 55 Cap Entry, veh/h 936 870 1020 821 V/C Ratio 0.180 0.147 0.121 0.067 Control Delay, s/veh 5.6 5.6 4.6 5.0 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 0 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 6/19/2018 2020 Project PM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 Roundabout 3: East Driveway/26th Ave S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 4.8 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SS Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 121 100 89 44 Demand Flow Rate, vehlh 121 103 119 44 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 27 99 132 148 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 165 152 16 54 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 17 61 61 57 Ped Cap Adj 0.998 0.992 0.992 0.992 Approach Delay, slveh 4.2 4.6 6.2 4.1 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Leff Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 121 103 119 44 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1100 1023 990 974 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 0.970 0.746 1.000 Flow Entry, veh/h 121 100 89 44 Cap Entry, veh/h 1097 985 732 967 WC Ratio 0.110 0.101 0.121 0.046 Control Delay, s/veh 4.2 4.6 6.2 4.1 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 0 0 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 6/19/2018 2020 Project PM LOS TENW Synchro 8 Report Page 4 ATTACHMENT C Future Traffic Volume Estimates T TENW 2020 AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Federal Way School District Wildwood Elementary School - 2406 S 300th St, Federal Way, WA Growth Ratel 3.0% AM Peak S3enewor ExistingYearl 2018 Enter Ext BaselineYearl 2020 53 45 2018 Existing 2020 Baseline Trip Distribution Project Trips 2020 With Project 53001e 9trL3m A" 3 S30OPI Mwd Ave11 S 300th 87r2N9 A" 3 1 S3001e SandAWS 5win Su23N Nve5 FT R 17 JI]B7 152 181S Bfi 31 57 161 F 10% i01, fi0% 109! 120% i' 10% a015 60% 5 5 27 $. 5934 - 18 32 23 1 13 113 33O 129 38 1 75 193 % Inc+carc = 6 1% Pmied Share = 17 4% 2 3 300h SMIM, PI Srylelt Dr7vew 2 O300m SO241n P1 SAYas1 ONMAY 2 S 30ft Owaft P, CJWm1 Od—y S 300th S024th PI SANest Driveway S 300th S024th PI SRNest Drlvewa 87 S 2 62 19 350 31 150 1Z,, 2g 49 92 5 2 66 26 371 33 159 136 3t 52 ary 60% 15% +0h 150% 10% 60% 50?L 5% 15% 27 7 5 74 5 32 27 ] B 119 5 2 73 25 -S37 191 i60 38 60 X � N %IACrease Sues • 16 5% 3 S 300th St126th Ave SlEast Driveway 3 1 6300ih 7913l1Q Ave WiLmt D11rtrw4y 3 S 300th Math Ave SlEast Drveway 3 S 3001h S026th Ave SX-t Driveway 3 S3007h SOCOth Are SiEnt D"—Y 65 4 2 39 40 139 37 44 SS 69 4 2 41 42 147 ]P 47 0 D 62 7C i Le 15% 25% 15% 1p% 204� 25% 7 13 2 39 3 8 5 ii 11 76 4 2 55 �5 1a7 -07 54 11 73 FIVE N %in&..e= 81% Prp.¢d `,+are=710Y. Date Printed: 1022018 TENW Page 1 of 1 2020 PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Federal Way School District Wildwood Elementary School - 2405 S 3OOth St, Federal Way, WA Growth Rate 3.0a/a Existing Year 2018 Baseline Yearl 2020 2018 Existing 2020 Baseline Trip Distribution PM Peak Generator Enter Exit 23 28 PM Peak Adjacent Street Traf0c Enter Exit 12 14 Project Trips 2020 With Project 1 2:30 to 3:30 PM 5-k4WM 81123m Ave: ! 5301111, M3,d A-S 1 530a1h 5023rd Ave S 1 PERK1.Od&ATQR 5300lh Sy23W Ave S '1 53001h S023M Ave n IN 63 14 �49 75 179 9 4 73 15 0 12 67 16 190 10 20 4 i8 77 10% 1010 80% 10% 120% 10%2 10% 4�yp 60% 3 3 17 313 2 11 14 10 0 14 84 1221 22 4 57 91 m m m n % Increase = fit% v v m n n Prapq Shale• 139% 2 2:30 to 3:30 PM 5300Ih r412tth P1 &Wftt O'hre+n 2 530%h m= Pt SNlmi Odra+ 2 S MM S112Y8 PI Shyest LdveA'a PEAK GENERATOR S 3001h S824th PJ SWest D11—Y S 3001h 502411, PI SlWesl Ddvewa Iv n 56 f0 12 59 25 198 29 69 3g i6 42 IV n 59 11 13 63 22 210 31 73 40 19 45 1O 17 4 2 38 3 14 12 1 4 n r� 76 11 13 67 25 246 34 67 52 20 46 fi0% 15% 10% 150% 10% fi0% j09a 5% 15% � � N %InttNse= 819E Pni Sun• 154% 2:30 to 3:30 PM 8 30gh W49M Ave 5!Ea11 Odveeay ] S 300th S826th Ave SlEast Driveway } S 300th 50261h Ave SlEast Ddveway 3 PEAK GUN FIIATOR S 30001 StI26th Ave SlEast Driveway 3 S 30011, 31/28th Ave SIE44t Ddveway 62 12 9 39 39141 30N5% 51 57 66ffl i0 41 54 0 60 15% 25% BO% 5% 15% 20% 25% 4 6 20 f 4 2 5 7 70 13 10 47 a3 170 33 58 5 87 % IntltaLc • 8.19} P."d Alen • 12 0% Date Printed 1022018 TENW Page 1 of 1 a s s o c i a t e d e a r t h s c i e n c e s incorporated Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT Federal Way, Washington FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT Project No. 180215E001 June 6, 2018 Updated August 29, 2018 �o ECEV D JAN 10 2019 CITY OF F E D E LAL VV?.Y OOMMUNITY DEVELOPNiEZ a s s o c i a t e d earth sciences i n c o r p o r a t e d June 6, 2018 Updated August 29, 2018 Project No. 180215EO01 Federal Way School District 1211 South 332nd Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Attention: Ms. Marlene Hickle Subject: Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Wildwood Elementary School Replacement 2405 South 300th Street Federal Way, WA Dear Ms. Hickle: We are pleased to present the enclosed copies of the above -referenced report. This report summarizes the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and geotechnical engineering studies, and offers preliminary recommendations for the design and development of the proposed project. We were provided with a Topographic Survey provided by AHBL, dated May 8, 2018, for preparation of this report. Our recommendations are preliminary in that project plans and construction methods were not available at the time this report was written. We should be allowed to review the recommendations presented in this report and modify them, if needed, once final project plans have been formulated. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that the recommendations presented in this report will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or if we can be of additional help to you, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer KDM/ms - 180215EO01-2 - Projects\20180215\KE\WP Kirkland Office 1911 Fifth Avenue I Kirkland, WA 98033 P 1425.827.7701 F 1425.827.5424 Everett Office 12911 % Hewitt Avenue, Suite 2 1 Everett, WA 98201 P 1425.259.0522 F 1425.827.5424 Tacoma Office 1 1552 Commerce Street, Suite 102 1 Tacoma, WA 98402 P 1253.722.2992 F 1253.722.2993 www.aesgeo.com SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT Federal Way, Washington Prepared for: Federal Way School District 1211 South 332"d Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 9115th Avenue Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 Fax: 425-827-5424 June 6, 2018 Updated August 29, 2018 Project No. 180215EO01 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the replacement of the Wildwood Elementary School in Federal Way, Washington. Our recommendations are preliminary in that the project is still early in the design phase. Recommendations in this report are based on review of a topographic survey by AHBL, dated May 8, 2018. The site location is shown on the "Vicinity Map," Figure 1. The approximate locations of explorations completed for this study are shown on the "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. Interpretive exploration logs of the subsurface explorations completed for this study are included in the Appendix. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data to be used in the design and development of the above -referenced project. Our study included reviewing selected available geologic literature, advancing ten total exploration borings, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow groundwater. Geotechnical engineering studies were completed to formulate preliminary recommendations related to site preparation and grading, the type of suitable foundations and floors, allowable foundation soil bearing pressures, anticipated foundation and floor settlement, pavement recommendations, drainage considerations, and shallow infiltration feasibility. This report summarizes our current fieldwork and offers preliminary recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. We recommend that we be allowed to review the recommendations presented in this report and revise them, if needed, when a project design has been finalized. 1.2 Authorizati We were authorized to proceed by means of an FWPS consultant agreement. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of FWPS and their agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-Projects �20180215JKE�WP Page 1 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is that of the existing school campus located in Federal Way, Washington. The project site is comprised of a single rectangular parcel. The current site development includes a school campus with a single irregularly shaped large -sized building and several smaller portable buildings. Other site features include existing paved driveways, paved parking lots, walkways, sports fields, playfields, and utilities. Site topography is generally level in the vicinity of the existing school building with terraced parking areas located on the west side of the site. Slopes border the parcel on all sides and were likely created during the grading and leveling of the building pad and field areas. These slopes are discussed further in the "Geologic Hazards and Mitigations" section of this report. At the time this report was prepared, this project was in the conceptual planning stage. We anticipate that the project will include the construction of one or more new school buildings near the footprint of the existing school building. We also understand the project design is considering infiltration of stormwater runoff from new impervious areas. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included advancing four exploration borings completed on May 17, 2018, with a subsequent round of six exploration borings completed on August 1, 2018. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the explorations completed for this study. The number, locations, and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. 3.1 Exploration Boring The exploration borings were completed by advancing hollow -stem auger tools with a truck -mounted drill rig. During the drilling process, samples were obtained at generally 2Y2-foot- and 5-foot-depth intervals. The exploration borings were continuously observed and logged by a representative from our firm. The exploration logs presented in the Appendix are based on the field logs, drilling action, and observation of the samples secured. Disturbed, but representative samples were obtained by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-1586. This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch, outside -diameter, split -barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140-pound hammer free -falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6-inch interval is recorded, and the number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the Standard Penetration Resistance ("N") or blow count. If a total of 50 is recorded within one 6-inch June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-ProjectsJ20180215�KE�WP Page 2 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions interval, the blow count is recorded as the number of blows for the corresponding number of inches of penetration. The resistance, or N-value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils; these values are plotted on the attached exploration boring logs. The samples obtained from the split -barrel sampler were classified in the field and representative portions placed in watertight containers. The samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification, as summarized in this report. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of selected applicable geologic literature. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. The general distribution of geologic units is shown on the exploration logs. The explorations typically encountered Vashon-age native sediments consisting of dense grading to very dense lodgement till near the surface or underlying existing fill soils. Existing fill was encountered in explorations EB-3, 4, 5, 9, and 10 and extended to a maximum depth of approximately 16 feet below the surface. Review of a regional geologic map (Geologic Map of Poverty Bay Quadrangle 7.5, King and Pierce Counties, Washington, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), prepared by Booth et al, 2004) indicates that the subject site is underlain by Vashon lodgement till. Our interpretation of the sediments encountered in our explorations is in general agreement with the regional geologic mapping. 4.1 Stratigraphy Grass/Topsoil A surficial layer of grass and organic topsoil was encountered at the locations of exploration borings EB-1, 3, 9, and 10. This organic layer ranged from approximately 3 to 6 inches in thickness. Observed topsoil thickness is shown on the attached subsurface exploration logs. Due to their high organic content, these materials are not considered suitable for foundation, roadway, slab -on -grade floor support, or for use in a structural fill. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2-Projects 120180215�KEIWP Page 3 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions Fill Surficial fill soils were observed in exploration boring EB-3, 4, 5, 9, and 10 to a maximum depth of 16 feet and was likely placed to establish grade for the terraced parking lots and level field area on the western portion of the campus. The existing fill generally consisted of loose to medium dense, very silty, fine sand, with variable amounts of gravel. The observed existing fill includes variable amounts of wood debris and other organic material. Existing fill is not considered suitable for foundation support and may require mitigation for pavement, or slab -on -grade floor support. Excavated existing fill material is suitable for reuse in structural fill applications if such reuse is specifically allowed by project plans and specifications, if excessively organic and any other deleterious materials are removed, and if moisture content is adjusted to allow compaction to the specified level and to a firm and unyielding condition. Based on our explorations completed for this study, we estimate the observed existing fill was above optimum moisture content for compaction purposes, and therefore may require drying during favorable weather prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Existing fill is not considered suitable for infiltration of stormwater runoff due to its high variability. Vashon Lodgement Till All ten of our explorations typically encountered dense grading to very dense, very silty to silty sand with gravel ranging to sandy silt with trace gravel, interpreted as Vashon lodgement till. Lodgement till encountered in our exploration borings extended beyond the maximum depth explored of 36.5 feet below existing ground surface. Lodgement till was deposited at the base of an active ice sheet and was subsequently compacted by the weight of the overlying glacial ice. Lodgement till typically possesses high -strength and low -compressibility attributes that are favorable for support of foundations, floor slabs, and paving with proper preparation. Lodgement till is silty and moisture -sensitive. In the presence of moisture contents above the optimum moisture content for compaction purposes, lodgement till can be easily disturbed by vehicles and earthwork equipment. Careful management of moisture -sensitive soils, as recommended in this report, will be needed .to reduce the potential for disturbance of wet lodgement till soils and costs associated with repairing disturbed soils. Reuse of lodgement till in structural fill applications will require drying to within 1 to 2 percent of optimum moisture content during dry site and weather conditions. Vashon lodgement till is generally considered unsuitable for infiltration of stormwater runoff due to its high fine-grained content and low permeability. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2-ProjectsA20180215JKEJWP Page 4 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions 4.2 Hydrology Groundwater was observed in exploration EB-3 completed for this study at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface. The encountered groundwater seepage represents trapped groundwater within the glacial till. The groundwater encountered within the unweathered till does not represent the regional aquifer, but a discrete zone of trapped groundwater that may be hydraulically pressurized, which can result in lower density and higher moisture contents in the surrounding sediments. We also anticipate that perched groundwater consisting of interflow may be encountered during the wetter months. Interflow commonly occurs when surface water infiltrates down through relatively permeable soils, such as the existing fill or weathered lodgement till sediments, and becomes trapped or "perched" atop a comparatively impermeable barrier, such as the unweathered lodgement till sediments. Groundwater conditions, including depth and duration and quantity of seepage should be expected to vary seasonally, and in response to changes in precipitation, soil grain -size distribution, topography, on- and off -site land usage, and other factors. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2O18) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-Projects �20180215JKEJWP Page 5 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and shallow groundwater conditions as observed and discussed herein. 5.0 LANDSLIDE HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Section 19.05.070 defines Landslide Hazard Areas (LHA). Based on our review of the AHBL topographic survey, portions of the slopes along the east, south, and west perimeter of the project parcel qualify for treatment as a LHA. These slope configurations achieves both the minimum inclination of 40 percent and the minimum height of 10 feet that are needed for classification as a LHA. For protection from LHAs, the FWRC Section 19.145.230 requires a standard buffer of 50 feet from the top and toe of the LHA, which can be reduced with further geotechnical study. Explorations completed for this study show that the site slopes consist of dense, glacially consolidated sediments that are favorable from a slope stability standpoint when exposed at slope inclinations such as those at this site. The current project calls for a new school building in the general location of the existing school building which is distant from the steep slope areas. Based on our subsurface explorations, understanding of the project layout we anticipate that the new building will be located outside of the prescriptive LHA buffers. However, if LHA buffer reductions are needed for the new building or other improvements AESI can address this once a layout and project plans have been formulated. 6.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Earthquakes occur regularly in the Puget Lowland. Most of these events are small and are not felt by people. However, large earthquakes do occur, as evidenced by the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event; and the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within a given 20-year period. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture, 2) seismically induced landslides, 3) liquefaction, and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2- Projects 120180215�KEJWP Page 6 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations 6.1 Surficial Ground Rupture The project area is located approximately 15 miles south of the Seattle Fault Zone and within the mapped limits of the Tacoma Fault Zone. Our current understanding of the Seattle Fault suggests that several fault traces are spread across a relatively wide zone. Recent studies by the USGS (e.g., Johnson et al., 1994, Origin and Evolution of the Seattle Fault and Seattle Basin, Washington, Geology, v. 22, p. 71-74 and Johnson et al., 1999, Active Tectonics of the Seattle Fault and Central Puget Sound Washington - Implications for Earthquake Hazards, Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1999, v. 111, n. 7, p. 1042-1053) have provided evidence of surficial ground rupture along a northern splay of the Seattle Fault. The recognition of this fault is relatively new, and data pertaining to it are limited, with the studies still ongoing. According to the USGS studies, the latest movement of this fault was about 1,100 years ago when about 20 feet of surficial displacement took place. This displacement can presently be seen in the form of raised, wave -cut beach terraces along Alki Point in West Seattle and Restoration Point at the south end of Bainbridge Island. The recurrence interval of movement along this fault system is still unknown, although it is hypothesized to be in excess of several thousand years. Geophysical surveys of the Puget Lowland in 1998 suggested the presence of a fault zone along the north side of the Tacoma basin generally between Tacoma and the south end of Hood Canal (Upper Crustal Structure in the Puget Lowland, Washington: Results from 1998 Seismic Hazards Investigation in Puget Sound, Journal of Geophysical research, v. 106, p. 13,541-13,564, by T.M. Brocher, T. Parsons, R.A. Blakely, N.I. Christiansen, M.A. Fisher, R.E. Wells, and SHIPS Working Group, 2001). More recent studies by the USGS have provided evidence of surficial ground rupture along the Tacoma Fault near Burly, Washington (The Catfish Lake Scarp, Allyn, Washington: Preliminary Field Data and Implications for Earthquake Hazards Posed by The Tacoma Fault, USGS Open -File Report 03-455, by B.L. Sherrod, A.R. Nelson, H.M. Kelsey, T.M. Brocher, R.J. Blakely, C.S. Weaver, N.K. Rountree, S.B. Rhea, and B.S. Jackson, 2003). The recognition of this fault is relatively new, and data pertaining to it is limited, with studies still ongoing. According to the USGS studies, the latest movement of this fault was about 1,100 years ago when several meters of surficial displacement took place. This displacement can presently be seen in the form of raised tidal flats in the Burly Lagoon, Lynch Bay, and North Cove, resulting in the present day freshwater marshes and forested lowlands. Further evidence of the faulting activity in this system has been seen at Wollochet Bay, where forested areas were inundated by water. Additionally, linear fault scarp features in the ground surface were exposed in recent Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) maps. The scarp features are located near Allyn, Washington, and have been described as trending parallel to the Tacoma Fault system. Studies also point to the fault system continuing across the Puget Sound, and it is inferred as continuing through Commencement Bay and the Puyallup River Delta. The slip rate along the Tacoma Fault is thought to be approximately 2 millimeters per year. However, very little is known about the recurrence interval of earthquakes along the Tacoma Fault. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2-ProjectsJ20180215JKEJWP Page 7 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations Related fault systems in the Puget Sound region have been hypothesized to have reoccurrence intervals in excess of several thousand years. Due to the suspected long recurrence interval, the potential for surficial ground rupture is considered to be low during the expected life of the proposed development. No mitigation efforts beyond complying with the requirements of the local jurisdictions and the 2015 International Building Code (IBC) are recommended for this site. 6.2 Seismically Induced Landslides It is our opinion that the risk of damage to the proposed structures by seismically induced landsliding during a design -level seismic event is low. No quantitative slope stability analysis was completed, and none is warranted for the project as currently proposed, in our opinion. 6.3 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a temporary loss in soil shear strength that can occur when loose granular soils below the groundwater table are exposed to cyclic accelerations, such as those that occur during earthquakes. The observed site soils were relatively dense and unsaturated and are not expected to be prone to liquefaction. A detailed liquefaction hazard analysis was not performed as part of this study, and none is warranted, in our opinion. 6.4 Seismic Site Class 2015 International Building Code In our opinion, the subsurface conditions at the site are consistent with seismic Site Class "C" in accordance with the 2015 IBC, and the publication ASCE 7 referenced therein, the most recent version of which is ASCE 7-10. 7.0 EROSION CONTROL The definition for Erosion Hazard Area is provide in Section 19.05.070(1) of the FWRC and is provided below. "Erosion hazard areas" are those areas identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) as having a moderate to severe or severe to very severe rill and inter -rill erosion hazard due to natural agents such as wind, rain, splash, frost action or stream flow; those areas containing the following group of soils when they occur on slopes of 15 percent or greater: Alderwood-Kitsap ("AkF"), Alderwood gravelly sandy loam ("AgD"), Kitsap silt loam ("KpD"), Everett (TvD"), and Indianola ("InD"); and those areas impacted by shore land and/orstream bank erosion. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-Projects 1201802151KEIWP Page 8 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations Review of the NRCS soil survey indicates that the majority of the site consists of Arents, Alderwood material of 0 to 6 and 6 to 15 percent slopes. A narrow portion of the east side of the site with dimension of approximately 100 feet wide by 600 feet long and oriented north -south along its longer axis is mapped as AgD, 15 to 30 percent slopes. This area appears to be associated with the east perimeter slope located just east of the gymnasium building. The Alderwood soil series is consistent with the glacial till soils encountered in several of our explorations. Based on review of the NRCS the area identified as AgD meets the criteria for erosion hazard. We have provided erosion mitigation recommendations in the following section. It is our opinion that if the recommendations provided in this report are followed that: • The project will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties or stormwater systems beyond predevelopment conditions, ■ The improvement will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties, and • The improvement will not adversely impact other critical areas. In order to reduce the amount of sediment transported off the site during construction, the following recommendations should be followed. ■ Silt fencing should be placed around the lower perimeter of all cleared area(s). The fencing should be periodically inspected and maintained as necessary to ensure proper function. • To the extent possible, earthwork -related construction should proceed during the drier periods of the year and disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Temporary erosion control measures should be maintained until permanent erosion control measures are established. • Areas stripped of vegetation during construction should be mulched and hydroseeded, replanted as soon as possible, or otherwise protected. During winter construction, hydroseeded areas should be covered with clear plastic to facilitate grass growth. ■ If excavated soils are to be stockpiled on the site for reuse, measures should be taken to reduce the potential for erosion from the stockpile. These could include, but are not limited to, covering the pile with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, and the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. ■ Interceptor swales with rock check dams should be constructed to divert stormwater from construction areas and to route collected stormwater to an appropriate discharge location. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-ProjectsJ20180215�KEJWP Page 9 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement PreliminaryGeotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations ■ A rock construction entrance should be provided to reduce the amount of sediment transported off -site on truck tires. ■ All stormwater from impermeable surfaces, including driveways and roofs, should be tight -lined into approved facilities and not be directed onto or above steeply sloping areas. ■ Sediment track -out onto City streets shall be avoided. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2-Prgjects�20180215jKEjWP Page 10 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations III. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8.0 INTRODUCTION Our explorations indicate that, from a geotechnical engineering standpoint, the proposed project is feasible provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. In the vicinity of the proposed new building, our explorations encountered dense to very dense glacial soils near the existing grade or surficial existing fill soils ranging in depth from 1 foot to 16 feet below the surface. Existing fill is not suitable for support of new foundations or floor slabs and warrants remedial preparation where it occurs below paving and similar lightly loaded structures. The variable depth of existing fill observed in our explorations could be addressed by any of several alternative remedial preparation strategies. This report provides three different methods for addressing existing fill below the new building and are discussed further on the Foundations Section. We are available to answer questions as the District, design team, and cost -estimating consultant evaluate these alternatives. The following report sections provide additional recommendations regarding site preparation, structural fill, grading, foundations, floor support, drainage, and pavement recommendations. 9.0 SITE PREPARATION Site preparation of building and paving areas should include removal of all grass, trees, brush, debris, and any other deleterious materials. All existing fill beneath planned foundation areas should be removed. Buried utilities should be removed from planned foundation areas, and should be abandoned in place or removed from below planned new paving. Any depressions below planned final grades caused by demolition activities should be backfilled with structural fill, as discussed under the "Structural Fill" section of this report. Existing topsoil should be stripped from structural areas. The actual observed in -place depth of grass and topsoil at the exploration locations is presented on the exploration logs in the Appendix. After stripping, remaining roots and stumps should be removed from structural areas. All soils disturbed by stripping and grubbing operations should be recompacted as described below for structural fill. Once demolition and stripping has been completed, any existing fill under areas of new foundations should be addressed. We recommend that existing fill be addressed using one of the strategies described in further detail below. It is important to include remedial preparation of the existing fill in the bid documents in a way that encourages competitive pricing and reduces the potential for claims of unanticipated conditions. We are available to review project specification sections related to geotechnical issues if requested to do so. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2-ProjectsJ20180215JKEJWP Page 11 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations Existing Fill Below New Building Option 1- Removal and Replacement The simplest approach to addressing existing fill below structural areas is removal of the existing fill, and replacement of the existing fill with compacted structural fill. We recommend using this approach in areas where existing fill is expected to extend to depths no greater than 6 feet below existing grades. Existing Fill Below New Building Option 2 - Removal of Existing Fill Below Foundation Elements Partial Removal of Existing Fill Below Floors This approach would treat foundation areas the same as Option 1. Floor slab areas would be excavated 2 feet below floor slab grade, any organic or excessively yielding areas would be repaired, and floor slab grade would be restored with structural fill. Significant upfront cost savings would result as compared to Option 1, with the tradeoff being that higher risks of future settlement would also result. The magnitude of the potential for future floor slab settlement under this option is difficult to predict since conditions within existing fill that would be left in place are unknown. Existing Fill Below New Building Option 3 - Aggregate Piers This approach would use compacted aggregate piers below foundation elements to improve existing loose fill. We recommend using this approach in areas where existing fill thickness is greater than 6 feet below existing grades. The structure would then be constructed with conventional shallow foundations above a subgrade improved with aggregate piers. Aggregate piers are flexible, in that they can be advanced to whatever depth is needed to penetrate existing fill, and therefore they are easily adapted to variable site conditions such as those that occur at this site. Aggregate piers also have the advantage that the structure employs a conventional shallow foundation design without complexities associated with deep foundation approaches such as foundation piles. Existing Fill Below New Pavin Below planned on -site paving, existing fill should be exposed, proof -rolled, and compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. If a firm and unyielding condition is achieved, no further remedial preparation would be needed. If excessively organic or yielding conditions are encountered, existing fill would be partially removed and replaced with imported structural fill. The depth of replacement of the existing fill below paving should be determined at the time of construction when field conditions are known. Alternatively, soil cement treatment could be used to complete remedial preparation of existing fill below planned new paving. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-Projectsj20180215jKEjWP Page 12 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations 9.1 Temporary Cut Slopes In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, temporary, unsupported cut slopes can be planned at 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) in unsaturated existing fill and weathered glacial till. Temporary slopes of 1H:1V can be planned in unsaturated, unweathered lodgement till. These slope angles are for areas where groundwater seepage is not present at the faces of the slopes. If ground or surface water is present when the temporary excavation slopes are exposed, flatter slope angles may be required. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur, and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. 9.2 Site Drainage and Surface Water Control The site should be graded to prevent water from ponding in construction areas and/or flowing into excavations. Exposed grades should be crowned, sloped, and smooth drum -rolled at the end of each day to facilitate drainage. Accumulated water must be removed from subgrades and work areas immediately prior to performing further work in the area. Equipment access may be limited, and the amount of soil rendered unfit for use as structural fill may be greatly increased if drainage efforts are not accomplished in a timely sequence. If an effective drainage system is not utilized, project delays and increased costs could be incurred due to the greater quantities of wet and unsuitable fill, or poor access and unstable conditions. During construction, surface water should be routed away from the site slopes and conveyed to an appropriate discharge location. At no time should uncontrolled surface water flow onto the site slopes. Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the proposed new building at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or to collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend that a gradient of at least 3 percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet from the building perimeters be provided, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of 1 percent should be provided, unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the additions. 9.3 Site Disturbance Most of the on -site soils contain fine-grained material, which makes them moisture -sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2- Projects 120180215�KEJWP Page 13 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. .4 Winter Construction The existing fill material and lodgement till contain substantial silt and are considered highly moisture -sensitive. Soils excavated onsite will likely require drying during favorable dry weather conditions to allow their reuse in structural fill applications. Care should be taken to seal all earthwork areas during mass grading at the end of each workday by grading all surfaces to drain and sealing them with a smooth -drum roller. Stockpiled soils that will be reused in structural fill applications should be covered whenever rain is possible. If winter construction is expected, crushed rock fill should be used to provide construction staging areas where exposed soil is present. The stripped subgrade should be observed by the geotechnical engineer, and should then be covered with a geotextile fabric, such as Mirafi 50OX or equivalent. Once the fabric is placed, we recommend using a crushed rock fill layer at least 10 inches thick in areas where construction equipment will be used. Soil cement treatment is another approach to providing a workable site during the winter. We are available to provide a more detailed cement -treatment plan on request and if allowed by the governing jurisdiction. 9.5 Frozen Subgrades If earthwork takes place during freezing conditions, all exposed subgrades should be allowed to thaw, and then be recompacted prior to placing subsequent lifts of structural fill or foundation components. Alternatively, the frozen material could be stripped from the subgrade to reveal unfrozen soil prior to placing subsequent lifts of fill or foundation components. The frozen soil should not be reused as structural fill until allowed to thaw and adjusted to the proper moisture content, which may not be possible during winter months. 10.0 STRUCTURAL FILL All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials, as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. For backfill of buried utilities in the right-of-way, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with the City of Federal Way codes and standards. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist, the surface of the exposed June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2-ProjectsJ20180215JKEJWP Page 14 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations ground should be recompacted to a firm and unyielding condition. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain, and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free -draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free -draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non -organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of ASTM D-1557. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the locations of the perimeter footings or roadway edges before sloping down at a maximum angle of 2H:1V. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils should be evaluated by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material at least 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture -sensitive. The existing fill and lodgement till soils encountered at the project site contain substantially more than 5 percent fine-grained material. Use of moisture -sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather and dry subgrade conditions. Construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free -draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free -draining fill consists of non -organic soil, with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction, and at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. A representative from our firm should inspect the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in -place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling progresses, and any problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid the Client in developing a suitable monitoring and testing program. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-Projects 120180215�KEJWP Page 15 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations 11.0 FOUNDATIONS Conventional continuous spread footings and column pads may be used for building support when founded directly on undisturbed dense to very dense native soil, on structural fill placed above suitable native deposits, or on aggregate piers as described in the "Site Preparation" section of this report. We recommend that an allowable bearing pressure of 3,500 pounds per square foot (psf) be used for design purposes, including both dead and live loads. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Foundation areas should be deepened, if necessary, to expose sediments suitable for the support of the recommended bearing pressure. It should be noted that the area bounded by lines extending downward at 1H:1V from any footing must not intersect another footing or filled area. In addition, a 1.5H:1V line extending down from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. However, all footings must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum, and no footing should be founded in or above organic or loose soils. Anticipated settlement of footings founded as recommended should be less than 3A inch with differential settlement one-half of the anticipated total settlement. Most of this movement should occur during initial dead load applications. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing or mat excavations prior to concrete placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be observed by AESI prior to placing concrete to verify that the design bearing capacity of the soils has been attained and that construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this report. Such observation may be required by the City of Federal Way. A perimeter foundation drain system should be provided as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and foundations extended down to competent natural soil. Once the base of the excavation is reached, consideration should be given to "armoring" the exposed subgrade with a thin layer of rock to provide a working surface during foundation construction. We recommend a 6-inch layer of crushed rock for this purpose. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-Projectsj20180215jKEjWP Page 16 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations 11.1 Drainage Considerations Foundations should be provided with foundation drains. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the proposed building. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system, but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the proposed building to achieve surface drainage. 12.0 FLOOR SUPPORT Floor slabs can be supported on suitable native sediments, on structural fill placed above suitable native sediments, or above at least 2 feet of new structural fill as outlined in the "Site Preparation" section of this report. Floor slabs should be cast atop a minimum of 4 inches of clean, washed, crushed rock, or pea gravel to act as a capillary break. Areas of subgrade that are disturbed (loosened) during construction should be compacted to a non -yielding condition prior to placement of capillary break material. Floor slabs should also be protected from dampness by an impervious moisture barrier at least 10 mils thick. The moisture barrier should be placed between the capillary break material and the concrete slab. 13.0 FOUNDATION WALLS The following preliminary recommendations may be applied to conventional walls up to 8 feet tall. We should be allowed to offer situation -specific input for taller walls. All backfill behind foundation walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed to resist lateral earth pressure represented by an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled, rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. Walls with sloping backfill up to a maximum gradient of 2H:1V should be designed using an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf for yielding conditions or 75 pcf for fully restrained conditions. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. As required by the 2015 IBC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we recommend a seismic surcharge pressure of 5H and 10H psf, where H is the wall height in feet for the "active" and "at -rest" loading June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-2-ProjedsJ20180215JKEIWP Page 17 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations conditions, respectively. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the midpoint of the walls. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on -site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM D-1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended, as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab -on -grade or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum 1-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. 13.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural soils.or supporting structural fill soils, and by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following allowable design parameters which include a factor of safety of 1.5: ■ Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf • Coefficient of friction = 0.35 14.0 SHALLOW INFILTRATION FEASIBILITY Generally, our explorations encountered Vashon lodgement till near the surface or underlying a layer of existing fill soils. In all ten of our exploration borings, the Vashon lodgement till extended beyond the depths explored. Existing fill soils are not considered suitable for use as an infiltration receptor due to their variability. Vashon lodgement till is also considered not suitable for use as an infiltration receptor due to its high fine-grained content and low permeability. In our opinion, shallow infiltration is not considered feasible at the project site. Our study included a deeper exploration boring (EB-2) to investigate the feasibility of deeper June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-18021SE001-2-Projects 120180215JKEIWP Page 18 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations infiltration strategies. EB-2 extended to a depth of 36.5 feet and did not encounter a suitable infiltration receptor unit. 15.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement sections included in this report section are for driveway and parking areas onsite, and are not applicable to right-of-way improvements. At this time, we are not aware of any planned right-of-way improvements; however, if any new paving of public streets is required, we should be allowed to offer situation -specific recommendations. Pavement areas should be prepared in accordance with the "Site Preparation" section of this report. If the stripped native soil or existing fill pavement subgrade can be compacted to 95 percent of ASTM D-1557 and is firm and unyielding, no additional overexcavation is required. Soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated to provide a suitable subgrade and backfilled with structural fill. The upper 2 feet of pavement subgrade should be recompacted to 95 percent of ASTM D-1557. If required, structural fill may then be placed to achieve desired subbase grades. We anticipate the interior parking lot and aisles will be subject to light traffic loads from passenger vehicles driving and parking. In these light traffic load areas, we recommend a pavement section consisting of 3 inches of hot -mix asphalt (HMA) underlain by 4 inches of crushed surfacing base course is the recommended minimum in areas of planned passenger car lanes and parking. Additionally, we anticipate that select areas of pavement onsite will encounter heavier loading from buses, fire trucks, garbage trucks, along with passenger vehicles. In these heavy traffic areas, a minimum pavement section consisting of 3% inches of HMA underlain by 3 inches of crushed surfacing top course and 4 inches of crushed surfacing base course is recommended. The crushed rock will provide improved and consistent drainage, which will extend the service life of the parking lot. The crushed rock courses must be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum density, as determined by ASTM D-1557. All paving materials should meet gradation criteria contained in the current Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications. Depending on construction staging and desired performance, the crushed base course material may be substituted with asphalt treated base (ATB) beneath the final asphalt surfacing. The substitution of ATB should be as follows: 4 inches of crushed rock can be substituted with 3 inches of ATB, and 6 inches of crushed rock may be substituted with 4 inches of ATB. ATB should be placed over a native or structural fill subgrade compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative density, and a 1%- to 2-inch thickness of crushed rock to act as a working surface. If ATB is used for construction access and staging areas, some rutting and disturbance June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2 - Projects J20180215JKEJWP Page 19 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations of the ATB surface should be expected. The general contractor should remove affected areas and replace them with properly compacted ATB prior to final surfacing. 16.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING Our report is preliminary since only a preliminary project concept was available at the time this report was prepared. We recommend that we be allowed to review project plans when they are completed and to revise the recommendations presented in this report as needed. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation system depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of our currently approved scope of work. June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2-ProjectsJ20180215JKE1WP Page 20 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement PreliminaryGeotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Tyler dorf, G.I.T., CESCL Senior Staff Geologist I -I Aothony W Rornanick, P. Project Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site and Exploration Plan Appendix: Exploration Logs �t•�r'l!. �ti Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer June 6, 2018 (Updated August 29, 2018) ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-2-ProiectsJ201802151KEJWP Page 21 WEPOM ,1 r �. .. I > ss0oin-st IN ` ANN ° - ' i � S"' �• 1 'L��- ._� •• 'tip •• 1 1. p ng 2 113 MatiaY al, esai�lbed- Z > 2 V a L L a s s o c i a t e d N earth sciences Ai C i P O .. 0 1000 2000 VICINITY MAP FEET DATA SOURCES /REFERENCES: WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL USGS: 7.5' SERIES TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS, ESRI/1-CUBEDINGS 2013 NOTE: BLACK AND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON i KING CO: STREETS, PARCELS, CITY LIMITS 1/18 ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE ITS i EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO PROD NO- DATE FIGURE: LOCATIONS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE INCORRECT INTERPRETATION 180215E001 5/18 1 LEGEND : SEEI EXPLORATION BORING -MST SM0 NOTE LOCATIONMODISTINCESSHOMMEASPROKMATE IT -E��E4WM���ULMWUOCTIMO�CSVTM�T�NM&'Al�E ITS °SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FEDERAL WAY. WASHINGTON APPENDIX Exploration Logs °o° ° Well -graded gravel and Terms Describing Relative Density and Consistency o o °o ° GW g ravel with sand, little to tzt Density SPT blows/foot no fines Very Loose o to 4 Coarse- `- >\ U Fn M1 Loose 4 to 10 Grained Soils Medium Dense 10 to 30 Test Symbols o n D o o °e °o ° °a GP Poorly -graded gravel o 0 0 0 o d and gravel with sand, Dense 3o to 5o Y O O 0 9 D� 0 � D GOO little to no fines Very Dense >50 G =Grain Size N o z ° o° o° M= Moisture Content Silt ravel and silty y g d 1° ° Consistency SPTt2t blows/foot A = Atterberg Limits c o c w —N ' a ° GM gravel with sand VerySoft 0 to 2 C= Chemical Fine- c Soft 2 to 4 DID =Dry Density Grained Soils m Medium Stiff 4 to 8 K = Permeability Stiff 8 to 15 Clayey gravel and Very Stiff 15 to 30 y All. GC clayey gravel with sand Hard >30 Component Definitions o Well -graded sand and r Descri five Term Size Range and Sieve Number SW sand with gravel, little Boulders Larger than 12" 0 � � Nam•••••• �,•.•.•.•.•.• cr to no fines Cobbles 3" to 12" N ` LL ..... Poorly Gravel 3" to No. 4 (4.75 mm) 0 0 0 > LO -graded sand Coarse Gravel 3" to 3/4" U UVII :• SP and sand with gravel, Fine Gravel 3/4" to No. 4 (4.75 mm) o little to no fines Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) 0 z° Coarse Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 10 (2.00 mm) y Silty sand and Medium Sand No. 10 (2.00 mm) to No. 40 (0.425 mm) �' rn SM silty sand with Fine Sand No. 40 (0.425 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) U o a LL gravel Silt and Clay Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) LO N _ SC Clayey sand and (3) Estimated Percentage Moisture Content cc NI clayey sand with gravel Component Percentage by Weight Dry - Absence of moisture, Trace <5 dusty, dry to the touch Slightly Moist - Perceptible Silt, sandy silt, gravelly silt, moisture 0 o MIL silt with sand or gravel Some 5 to <12 > Moist - Damp but no visible in _2 Modifier 12 to <30 water Clay of low to medium o u, (silty, sandy, gravelly) Very Moist Water visible but d CL plasticity; silty, sandy, or not free draining z = gravelly clay, lean clay Very modifier 30 to <50 Wet Visible free water, usual) y yw (silty, sandy, gravelly) from below water table a = Organic clay or silt of low Symbols _ — OL plasticity Blows/6" or 0 — — Sampler portion of 6" Cement grout ° Type surface seal Elastic silt, clayey silt, silt 2.0" OD Sampler Type o MH with micaceous or Split Spoon „ Description Bentonite o Ln m diatomaceous fine sand or ,� Sampler 3.0" OD Split Spoon Sampler Filter pack with o N o 'Silt (SPT) 3.25" OD Split -Spoon Ring Sampler 14)seal blank casing Clay of high plasticity, m�CH o sandy or gravelly clay, fat Bulk sample 3.0" OD Thin -Wall Tube Sampler section Screened casing E Cq in clay with sand or gravel (including Shelby tube) or Hydrotip with filter pack 0 -- v7 '— Grab Sample End ca p Organic clay or silt of o Portion not recovered OH medium to high ftt percentage by dry weight tot Depth of ground water plasticity t2t (SPT) Standard Penetration Test 1 ATD = At time of drilling (ASTM D-1586) Q Static water level (date) (3t In General Accordance with > •E N Peat, muck and other rn o, o PT highly organic soils Standard Practice for Description (5) Combined USCS symbols used for = O rn and Identification of Soils (ASTM D-2488) fines between 5% and 12% Classifications or soils in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual -manual and/or laboratory classification methods of ASTM D-2487 and D-2488 were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. a s s o c i a t e d e a r t h s c i e n c e s EXPLORATION LOG KEY FIGURE Al 0,'j i n c o r p o r a I e d sacIatad Exploration Lo aas e art h sciences Project Number Exploration Number Sheet i n co r p o ra led 180215EO01 EB-1 1of1 Project Name W'Ifdwood Elemental y School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 493 Location Federal Way, WA Datum NAVn RR Driller/Equipment E QI /_TfUCIC_ Ig Date Start/Finish 5117/1 R 5117/1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 140# i 30" Hole Diameter (in) R inrhPc _ _ .L S] cL E C o N ' a) N °7 J ` fp Blows/Foot N � � n � O N o T U) 7 rn DESCRIPTION o 0 m m t ° Grass Turf / To oil - 6 inches 10 20 30 40 Weathered Vashon Lodgement Till Rough drilling 6 inches to 1 foot. S-1 Moist, brown to light reddish brown, fine SAND, some silt, trace gravel; minor 14 • 50r " organics; driller noted pounding on rock (SP-SM). Vashon Lodgement Till - 5 Harder drilling observed at 4 feet. S-2 Moist, gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace grave; unsorted (SM). 0/ " " 50! - 10 Moist,light brownish gray to gray, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted oi 36 S-3 -' . Tough drilling observed -12 to 13 feet with abundant gravel. - 15 Moist, light brown to light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel-, 0/ 1,50/ S-4 unsorted SM . " Bottom of exploration boring at 15.5 feet No groundwater encountered- - 20 - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: TG m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Water Level () Approved by: JHS ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Lo earth sciences Project Number Exploration Number Sheet i n c o Apo ra led 180215E001 EB-2 1 1of1 Project Name Wildwood ElementaU School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 492 Location Federal Way, WA Datum NAVE-) RR Driller/Equipment EDI / Truck Rig Date Start/Finish 5/17/18 5/17/1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 1_40# 1 3-0-" Hole Diameter (in) 8 inrhPc cL c O �, m > J f0 N Blows/Foot Y N 'aE CD S T� o m DESCRIPTION " m ° 10 20 30 40 Asphalt • 4 inches Crushed Rock Material - 4 inches Vashon Lodgement Till Moist to very moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 6 S-1 - unsorted; top 6 inches of sampler is wet (SM). 18 39 21 5 S-2 _'.' Moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, some ravel; unsorted SM 9 9 Y, rY ty, 9 ( )• 29 • 6501 - 10 S 3 Moist, light brown to light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; 19 unsorted (SM),/ - 15 As above. 25 S-4 38 A 650/ " 0/ " - 20 S-5 '. Moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, some ravel; unsorted SM 9 9 Y� rY tY, 9 ( )• 22 01 • 501 " Very gravelly drilling observed -•21 to 25 feet. - 25 S-6 .= ' As above. Q1 - 30 Moist, light brown to light brownish gray, sandy, SILT, trace gravel; ranges to 10 S-7 very silty, sand; unsorted (ML-SM). 19 4153 34 - 35 -' Driller added water to aid in drilling. 19 S-8 :.. As above. Q" Bottom of exploration boring at 36.5 feet No groundwater encountered. Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: TG m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Q Water Level() Approved by: JHS IN Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Lo e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-3 1of1 Project Name Wlldwood Elementary School _ Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 494 Location F _ Datum NAyn RR Driller/Equipment ED) i Truck Rio _ Date Start/Finish 5117/1 R 5117/1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130" Hole Diameter (in) _8 inches N .275 t a n� O N Diu -a,N Blows/Foot rn F E � E o `m `° O u) o T DESCRIPTION m m t ° 10 20 30 40 ' Grass Turf • 3 inches I H_ard dri[ling_observed ai 1.5 feet. _ _ _ _ _ T ^ ^ ^ ^ _ _ _ _ i Vashon Lodgement Till - Moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 11 S-1 _ 24 Gravelly drilling observed 4 to 5 feet. 44 5 Meist, ligh' brownish gray to light gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; 37 S-2 unsorted (SM) 0!i 10 S-3 Mast light brown to light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted; ranges to very silty; driller noted pounding on rock (SM). 15 S-4 - 20 S-5 '. - 25 - 30 - 35 NN Very moist to wet, light brown to light brownish gray, sandy, SILT, trace gravel; unsorted; sampler is wet; layers (-1 inch thick) of silt and sandy silt (ML). Moist, light brown, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). Bottom of exploration boring at 21.5 feet Perched groundwater encountered at 15 feet. I I 1 I n Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) L ® Grab Sample 0 No Recovery M - Moisture Ring Sample Q Water Level() 0 Shelby Tube Sample -T Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Logged by: TG Approved by: JHS associated Exploration Lo earth sciences Project Number Exploration Number Sheet in co rp o ra led 180215EO01 EB-4 1of1 Project Name Wildwood Elennentacy School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) �4 2 Location Federal WA Datum NAVn 88 Driller/Equipment . EDI / rillC,k [� Date Start/Finish 5/17/1 R 5/17/1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130" Hole Diameter (in) y Q U n� O ) N > J rn Blows/Foot to F E 5,E o `m o T N '2 L9 u) DESCRIPTION O " f0 m L_ ° 10 20 30 40 Asphalt • 5 inches i I i Moist to very moist, light brownish gray to gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace 2 S-1 gravel; minor organics (SM). 2 'L11 9 5 Moist, light gray to dark brown, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; minor 3 S-2 organics; low recovery due to soft material (SM). g A 10 10 Very moist, brown to dark brown with minor oxidation, very silty, fine SAND, 2 S-3 trace gravel; wood debris and organics in sampler (SM). 3 3 Wood debris and small organics in drill cuttings. .--------------------------------- Vashon Lodgement Till Slightly tougher drilling observed at 13.5 feet. 15 S-4 ' • Moist, light gray to gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). Very tough drilling observed at 16 feet. 20 S-5 f I Moist, light gray to light brown, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted; 11 --,ranges to sandy silt SM-ML . Bottom of exploration boring at 21 feet No groundwater encountered. 25 30 35 -Al Sampler Type (ST) YI m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: TG m�3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D 8 M) Ring Sample Water Level() Approved by: 1HS ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) ess0cIated Exploration Lo earth sciences Project Number Exploration Number Sheet '"corpora'ed 180215EO01 EB-5 1 1of1 Project Name wood Elementa hool Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 485 Location Datum NAVI) $$ Driller/Equipment EmAronmental Drillhg bC._I TTUCk Mounted _ Dill I Date Start/Finish R/1 /1 R $/1 /1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130" _ Hole Diameter (in) 75 _ L p a O N - J N �- Blows/Foot in f0 cD U) E o T rn DESCRIPTION o M m 0 3: L ° 10 20 30 40 Asohalt - 2 inches l Moist, light brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; minor S-1 organics (SM). 1C 6 5 Moist to very moist, slightly oxidized dark brown to gray, silty, fine SAND, trace S-2 to some gravel; minor organics (wood debris) (SM). 4 3 �10 7 Moist to very moist, slightly oxidized brown to dark brown, silty, fine SAND, S-3 trace to some gravel; occasional organics (woody debris) (SM). 2 A4 2 Vashon Lodgement Till 10 Driller notes tougher drilling at 9 feet. Moist to slightly moist, brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 26 S-4 unsorted (SM). 1 t3 37 15 Moist, gray to grayish brown, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel, ranging to S-5 sandy, SILT; unsorted (SM-ML). Very tough drilling observed at 17 feet with abundant gravel. 20 Moist, brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). S-6 Bottom of exploration boring at 21.5 feet No groundwater encountered. 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) Q No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample Water Level() Approved by: CJK a ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Exploration L eassooIa[ed e art h sciences Project Number -T Exploration Number Sheet icur Po ra ed 180215E001 EB-6 1of1 _ Project Name Wildwood Elementary School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 485 Location Federal WaX WADatum NAVD 88 Driller/Equipment Environmental Drilling Inc.Truck Mounted Drill Date Start/Finish All /1 R 9/1 /1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 1 30" Hole Diameter (in) 7 ri U) a , U c n 3 Blows/Foot o T U) '7 DESCRIPTION o U 3 ° 10 20 30 40 Asphalt - 2.5 inches Vastion Lodgement Till Difficult drilling 0.5 to 2 feet. 5 S 1 .: Moist, brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 26 ' � ' Z. p/ buri Tough drilling and abundant gravel at 7 feet. 10 S-2 Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted; rocks at top 0/ L50/ of sampler (SM). Switched to cathead 1401b hammer at 10 feet. Very tough drilling and abundant gravel at 11 feet. — 15 S-3 Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 01 50i — 20 S-4 .' As above, or rec ove . D! 501 Bottom of exploration boring at 20.5 feet No groundwater encountered. — 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Q Water Level () Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) Exploration Lo eassoc�a[ed e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215E001 EB-7 1of1 Project Name Wildwood Element= School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 485 Location Federal WaXWA Datum NAVD88 Driller/Equipment Emdronmental DdIlina Inc. Truck Mounted Drill Date Start/Finish 811118 811 /1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 140# / 30" _ Hole Diameter (in) 75 w a) U O n� E c O �, � > N Blows/Foot w U1 m n 3 a) o T U DESCRIPTION o m ° 10 20 30 40 1 Asphalt - 2 inches Weathered Vashon Lodgement Ti I I S-1 Moist, grayish light brown, fine SAND, some silt, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 1 4 Vashon Lodgement Till 5 S-2 Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel ranging to fine SAND, 0 some silt, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). S-3 fl, Moist, light brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 10 S-4 Moist to very moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted; rock in spoon (SM). 15 S-5 Moist, light brownish gray, silty to very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM)- Difficult drilling and abundant gravel observed at 17 feet. 20 S-6 Muis:, r� silky, fine SAND, some cravc-!. unsorted ---g-`�'' Bottom of exploration boring at 20.25 feet No groundwater encountered. 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m Y OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample �Z Water Level() Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample t Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) ExplorationLo aass0cIated earth sciences Project Number Exploration Number Sheet i n c o r p o ra t e d 180215E001 EB-8 1of1 Project Name Wlldmod ElementaZL5shool Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 485 Location Federal Way. WA __ Datum NAVD 8R Driller/Equipment Enviro mentallin _ _ Inc. /Truck Mounted DdIl Date Start/Finish R/1 /1 R,9/1 /1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130" Hole Diameter (in) _7.5 t d) a L p a� E c O - �— m N Blows/Foot w N n S E 105, T DESCRIPTION 0 cc m o 10 20 30 40 Asphalt • 2 inches j Weathered Vast= Lodgement Till I Difficult drilling at 2 feet. 5 Moist, brawn to brownish gray with minor oxidation, silty, fine SAND, trace S-1 ravel; minor organics; unsorted; poor recovery; rootlets in gray, silty, fine sand 22 SNI). 21 A32 11 _ Vashon Lodgement Till 10 S-2 Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). U! 15 f . As above, poor recovery. S-3 Bottom of exploration boring at 15.25 feet No groundwater encountered. 20 25 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Water Level() Approved by: CJK w ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) S 0 C lated Ex IorationLoeartiences eas Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-9 1 1of1 Project Name Wildmood ElemenWry School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 485 Location Datum NAyn RR Driller/Equipment En%ironmental Drill in n Truck Mounted Drill Date Start/Finish 19/1 /1 R 19/1 /1 R Hammer Weight/Drop 140# ! 30" Hole Diameter (in) .7-5 r a) O a-0 O '= m °) > � 3 N Blows/Foot y H S m E 2 5, iO Cn n �' Eo m DESCRIPTION U N t ° 10 20 30 40 Grass Turf - 3 inches Fill I I' Moist to very moist, brown with slight iron oxidized staining, fine SAND, some 5 S-1 sill, trace gravel; minor organics (rootlets) (SM). milm 15 W S3IJ- Very moist, dark brown to grayish brown, silty tine SAND, trace gravel ranging to SILT, some sand; minor organics (woody debris) (S1A-ML). --------------------------- Vashon Lodgement Till Moist, light brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). Difficult drill action at 14 feet. Very difficult drill action at 18 feet. S-4 Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 20 Difficult drilling and abundant gravel observed at 20 feet. S-5 As above, trace ravel, poor recove . 25 Bottom of exploration boring at 24.25 feet No groundwater encountered. a 1E 7 4 1E 6 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture o m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) L Ring Sample Q Water Level() FO ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) a Logged by: CC Approved by: CJK s 0 G I a t e d Ex IorationLoeartiences eas Project Number Exploration Number Sheet I nc O r p o r a t e d 180215E001 EB-10 1of1 Project Name Wildwood Elementary School _ Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 485 Location Federal Way, WA Datum NAVE) A$ Driller/Equipment Ernriranmental Drilling Inc. / Truck Mounted Drill Date StarUFinish 8/1 /18 8/1/18 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130" Hole Diameter (in) 75 ip n EnU a) 0 p CD N J N Blows/Foot to CD S E m T 2 lO ro E m t DESCRIPTION (5 3 m ° 10 20 30 40 Grass Turf - 3 inches {., Fill Driller notes large rock at 1 foot. 5 10 15 20 25 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 tNl Moist, brown to bluish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; minor organics mostly in top 6 inches (SM). Difficult drilling 7 to 8 feet. .-I Moist to very moist, dark brown to dark gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 1 minor organics (rootlets and woody debris in sampler tip); unsorted (SM). 31 31 11 Sampler Type (ST) Moist to very moist, brownish to bluish gray, silty to very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel transitioning to silty, fine SAND, some gravel; minor organics at bottom 3 inches of sampler (SM). Vashon Lodgement Till Moist, light brownish gray, silty fine SAND, some gravel (SM) Difficult drilling at 17 feet. Moist, brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). Moist. brownish gray, silty, gravelly, fine SAND; unsorted Bottom of exploration boring at 25.5 feet No groundwater encountered. 6 8 m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample Q Water Level() Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESUBMITTED Department of AUG 2 6 2019 Maintenance & Operations TO: Department of Ecology C4WMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 19 ®1 0 0 960 FROM: Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations PROJECT: Mirror Lake Elementary School, Lake Grove Elementary School, and Wildwood Elementary School SUBJECT: SEPA Square Footage Update DATE: June 24, 2019 This memorandum is regarding the Federal Way Public Schools capital bond projects SEPA Square Footage. Specifically for Mirror Lake Elementary School SEPA square footage wording change from "60,322 square feet vs. 63,590 square feet to 65,825 square feet". Changing the SEPA wording for the square footage does not affect the overall compliance and/or does not create significant impacts. As projects move through the design process, there are adjustments to the square footages. In the schematic document phase of this project, 60,322 square feet vs. 63,590 square feet was the project evolving through the design process. In the current construction document phase, 65,825 square feet is what this project has come to its conclusion. Therefore, Federal Way Public Schools, making this SPEA square footage wording change allows the project to be consistent with the construction documents. 01VL 6-4 - Mike Benzien Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. 1211 S. 332"d St, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 p.253.945.5930 I f.253.945.59591 www.fwps.org ntegrus Truse RECEIVED June 21, 2019 Natalie Kamieniecki City of Federal Way 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 SUN 2. 4 2019 C,VTY OF �pMM NITY DEVELOPMENT RE. File #19-100173-00-UP; TECHNICAL REVIEW LETTER Wildwood Elementary School, 2405 SW 300th Street, Federal Way 117 S. Main St., Suite 100 Integrus Project No. 21738.00 Seattle, WA 96104 206.628.3137 1 office 206.626.3136 1 fax Dear Ms. Kamieniecki: Below are written responses to your technical review letter dated March 14, 2019. A complete plan set with clouds identifying all revisions has been submitted with the written responses. Natalie Kamieniecki - Planning Division 1. Not all reports or documents referenced in the SEPA checklist were provided to the city. Please provide the following reports for the city's files: Subsurface Investigation Report; and PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc., (9/21) and Soils Analysis to detect the presence of historic arsenic and/ or lead contamination. Response: The following documents from PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc. are included in the resubmittal: 09/21/2018 — Subsurface Soil UST Investigation Report 4/1512019 — Supplemental Arsenic and I or Lead Contamination Report 4/2/2019 — Hazardous Materials Survey Report 2. The geotechnical engineering report is preliminary and does not reflect the final site design. The report must be updated to reflect an analysis of the proposed design and any additional recommendations as applicable. Response The following documents from Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. are included in the resubmittal: 04/10/2019 — Revised Geotechnical Engineering Report 3. Pursuant to FWRC 19.125.160, no improvement or structure maybe in a required yard except as follows: "(5) Fences and railings not over six feet in height may be located in required yards." Please demarcate clearly where proposed new fencing is located. The fence height must six feet in height, or relocated outside the required yard setbacks, as applicable. In addition, FWRC 19.115.090(1)(f) requires such fencing to contain vinyl -coated mesh, sntegru,GRF Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 2 June 21, 2019 powder —coated poles, dark color(s), and architectural element(s) such as pole caps and/or a decorative grid pattern. Provide the fence details of how this requirement is met. Response: As part of the Federal Way Public Schools Educational Specifications and safe school plan, a 10' high fence is proposed around the perimeter of the outdoor play area to accommodate the unique safety challenges around schools and create a safe and supervisable site for scholars. The height of the fence complies with requirements of the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) per FWRC 19.200.090 and the requirements of RCW 28A.320.125 — Safe School Plans. The fence is located behind the type III perimeter landscaping buffer in the 50' setback to maximize open space and activity opportunities for scholars and community members using the site after school hours while maintaining a safe and secure facility. All proposed fences have been relocated outside of the required yard setback as shown on L100 and L200. All proposed chain link fencing and material meets the conditions as required by FWRC 19.115.090(1)(0. Fence and gate details are shown on sheet L403. 4. Sheet L200 lists incorrect parking lot landscape calculations. Per FWRC 19.125.070(2), Type IV landscaping is required in the amount of 22 square feet per parking stall when 50 or more parking stalls are provided. A total of 71 parking stalls are provided. Please revise the calculations for required parking lot landscaping. Response: Parking lot calculations have been updated to reflect the required 22 SF per parking stall as shown on L200. 5. Pedestrian connections from the two parking lots to the school building are needed. Per FWRC 19.115.050(4), all pedestrian pathways through asphalt parking areas require a variation in paved texture and color. Approved methods of delineation include stone, brick or granite pavers, exposed aggregate, or stamped and colored concrete. Please provide a material choice on resubmitted sheets. Response: Pedestrian connections from the parking lots will be concrete pavement with an exposed aggregate finish to meet the requirements of FWRC 19.115.050(4) as shown on L100 and 1-200. 6. Please provide either a color rendition of the elevation drawings with a material list, or a color and materials board, with the resubmittal. Response: Refer to sheet G-006 for updated color and materials board and updated sheet A-201 for colored elevations. 7. The building design provides alternative methods to organize and shape the structural elements, instead of providing the significant structural modulation stated in FWRC 19.115.100(3). Staff will consider the alternative method to satisfy community design guidelines if all of the following architectural and accessory design elements listed in FWRC 19.115.060(3)(b) are provided along the west elevation: • Window openings with visible trim material, or painted detailing that resembles trim; • Artwork, such as mosaics, murals, decorative masonry, or metal patterns or grillwork, i ntegruiSTURE Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 3 June 21, 2019 sculptures, relief, etc., over a substantial portion of the blank wall surface. (The Federal Way Arts Commission may be used as an advisory body at the discretion of the planning staff.); Architectural features, such as setbacks, indentations, overhangs, projections, articulated cornices, bays, reveals, canopies, and awnings; and Material variations, such as colors, brick or metal banding, or textural changes. Response: The west facade incorporates window openings that are articulated by sheet metal flashing trim material creating a shadow box that organizes groupings of windows along the facade, refer to sheet G-006 and A-201 for character and locations. Refer to sheet G-006 and A-201 for updated elevations identifying location for student provided artwork as a decorative glazed tile accent band and a custom perforated metal vertical trellis at the vertical siding area at the downspouts that is incorporated into the design of the exterior facades. Architectural features at the parapet incorporates height variation and emphasizes the material modulation of the facades. All facades incorporate material, color, and textural variations, refer to sheet G-006 for material and color descriptions. The building design is comprised principally of concrete masonry veneer base, cement board panel and plank siding, and window assemblies with an articulated parapet roof design. 8. Per FWRC 19.275.080, temporary trailers, buildings, or other structures used for constriction offices, or outdoor storage containers used temporarily to store construction materials, and normally associated with construction of a building or development, are permitted on the subject property during building or development subject to Process I approval, or integration into the land use process applicable to the underlying project. To avoid requiring a separate Process I application, staff recommends you include a plan that depicts the location of temporary trailers and/or construction materials with the Process III resubmittal. Response: Refer to submitted logistics plans from the contractor for location of construction trailers, fences, and containers. Ann Dower Public Works — Development Services Division Technical Information Report 1. The underground detention facility must be approved by the Surface Water Management Division. A request must be submitted providing justification for the need to place it underground. Response: LPD has provided a design intent approval request letter to EJ Walsh, Director of Public Works, City of Federal Way, dated April 1, 2019. 2. The geotechnical report states that these are Fill soils on this site. Have the geotechnical engineer establish where fill soils are within the footprint of the detention facility. Per Section 5.1.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWD), provide an analysis for the stability and constructability of the detention facility in fill soils as necessary. i nteg ru,s,VRF Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 4 June 21, 2019 Response: According to the geotechnical report prepared by AESI, dated 4-10-19, no fill soils were encountered within the proposed detention facility footprint. The detention system will be excavated into dense lodgement till. 3. If the geotechnical engineer finds fill soils within the footprint of the detention facility, provide verification from the Stormtech Chamber manufacturer that this is a suitable situation for their product, and provide any additional measures needed to prevent infiltration or perched water from the detention system. Response: According to the geotechnical report prepared by AESI, dated 4-10-19, no fill soils were encountered within the proposed detention facility footprint. The detention system will be excavated into dense lodgement till. See geotechnical permit review comment response letter dated 6/14/2019 for additional clarification. Page 3 4. The amount of pollution generating impervious area within the public right-of-way has not been determined at this time. Once the right-of-way modification request is processed, flow control and water quality requirements will be determined. The applicant will be required to provide the actual square footage of pollution -generating and non -pollution generating impervious areas, not a general statement. Response: The amount of pollution generating impervious area within the public right-of-way is provided in the TIR based on LPD's coordination with Erik Preston, Sr Traffic Engineer at the City of Federal Way. Water Quality Treatment will be provided by Contech's Filterra Systems for the ROW improvements. Flow control will be provided by the StormTech Detention System located on -site. Design Calculations are provided in Appendix B of the TIR report. Core Requirement#1 5. Page 2 of the TIR references several discharge points, while this narrative references one. All narrative must be consistent throughout the report. Response: Core Requirement #1 section narrative was updated to reference the multiple discharge points. Page 4 6. Provide the calculations establishing the exemption for flow control within the public right-of- way. These should be completed after the right—of-way modification is finalized, but before final land use approval. Response: Flow control for improvements in the public right-of-way will be provided by the StormTech Detention System located on -site. Page 5 7. The total amount of pollution -generating impervious surface within the public right-of-way must be provided by the applicant once the right-of-way modification is finalized. Water quality treatment may be required. ntegrurrCruAr Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 5 June 21, 2019 Response: The amount of pollution generating impervious area within the public right-of-way is provided in the TIR based on LPD's coordination with Erik Preston, Sr Traffic Engineer at the City of Federal Way. Water Quality Treatment will be provided by Contech's Filterra Systems for the ROW improvements. Flow control will be provided by the StormTech Detention System located on -site. Design Calculations are provided in Appendix B of the TIR report. Page 7 8. For drainage complaints, please contact SWM Engineering Technician Paul Heller at 253-835- 2754, or Pauiheller(a)cityoffederalway.com(a)cityoffederalway.com_ King County does not track complaints within the City of Federal Way. Response: County drainage complaints records were obtained by Paul Heller, SWM Engineering Technician. TIR was updated to reflect the information received. 9. Figure 6 of the Downstream Drainage Map does not match city drainage information. Please contact Paul Heller for city records and resolve the differences. Response: City records were obtained by Paul Heller, SWM Engineering Technician. LPD coordinated with Ann Dower, PE, City's Senior Engineering Plan Reviewer, to verify the downstream drainage basins. The downstream drainage maps were updated and now match City's drainage information, see TIR. 10. Include photos with descriptions of the downstream area within at least % mile downstream of each of the basins. The public right-of-way must be included in this analysis. Response: Photos with descriptions of the downstream area within at least % mile downstream of each of the basins are included in the TIR. Storm Drainage analysis includes the public right-of-way. Page 11 11. Provide a map of the bypass area(s). Outline how the bypass area(s) meet the criteria outlined in KCSWDM Section 1.2.3.2.E. The detention facility should be oversized to compensate for bypass areas, or BMP's, or other flow control should be provided. Additional treatment methods should also be incorporated into the design. Response: Refer to Figure 5 in TIR showing sub -basins and bypass areas. Bypass areas were included in detention modeling to oversize detention in order to compensate for these bypassed areas. Detention design calculations are included in Appendix B. Page 12 12. The MGS flood report was not attached as Appendix B. This must be included. Response: MGSFIood report is attached in Appendix B. 13. Low Impact Development measures must be incorporated into this design. Type and location shall be determined prior to application for a building permit. If dispersion is not feasible, then soils logs and infiltration testing must be provided to determine applicability of infiltration integrus rTUNE Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 6 June 21, 2019 measures. Response: LPD revised TIR to clarify the LID BMPs were evaluated and incorporated into the design to the maximum extent feasible. Section 4A and Section 4B each have a LID sub -section for evaluation. The project is proposing to use basic dispersion for all target surfaces included in MFD#5 sub -basin. Per the geotechnical report, much of the site is underlain with fill soils that are not suitable as an infiltration receptor. All borings contained glacially consolidated glacial till. The lodgement till is very dense and silty, and the infiltration potential of lodgement till is very, very low. Therefore, conventional infiltration facilities were determined to be infeasible by the geotechnical engineer. Page 13 14. Provide design criteria and WSDOE GULD approval for Biofiltration Swales and Media Filter Drains. All water quality methods must meet the Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment requirements. Response: Support documentation is provided in Appendix B demonstrating that proposed media filter drains have DOE General Use Level Designation (GULD) for enhanced treatment. Additionally, sizing calculations for the media filter drains are included in Appendix B. There are no proposed biofiltration swales. Page 14 15. Provide a plan of the four water quality sub -basins and bypass areas. The play area, since it is gated for traffic, must be treated. Please clarify. Response: Figure 5 shows the water quality sub -basins and bypass areas. Water quality treatment is provided for the play area. Page 15 16. Provide a full evaluation of all Low Impact Development BMP's and select those that will be provided or this site. Preliminary sizing must be included in the TIR and location must be shown on the plans. Response: A full evaluation of all Low Impact Development BMPs was completed. Including rationale for selected BMP's is included in the TIR. 17. Flow control and water quality for frontage improvements will be revisited once the right-of-way modification is finalized. Both are required for the full frontage, whatever the outcome of the modification decision. Response: Water quality for frontage will be provided by Filterra Systems. Flow control for frontage will be provided by the onsite detention system. Appendix A and B 18. Conveyance, detention, and treatment sizing must be submitted at this time. Response: Conveyance, detention, and treatment sizing calculations are provided in Appendix B. integruTsTUflE Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 7 June 21, 2019 Plans 19. No Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) or Certificate of Occupancy (CO) will be approved until all stormwater and frontage improvements are installed, inspected, and approved by the City of Federal Way Public Works Department. Response: This Note was added to the Plan Sheets. 20. Explain how basic solid waste requirements are being met, and identify facilities on the site plans. Response: Solid waste dumpsters are located within the service yard and will convey any liquid within this area to the sanitary sewer. See Sheets C-301 to C-304 and A-003 and A- 004. Grading and Drainage (200 series) 21. The plans call out a media filter drain, but the referenced detail is for a compost amended bioswale. Resolve the differences. I did not find that compost amended bioswales have GULD approval for Enhanced Treatment, so they would not be approved for water quality treatment for this site. Response: Plans have been updated and callouts for media filter drains reference the correct details. There is no compost amended bioswale. 22. Provide catch basin numbers, flow directional arrows, and invert/rim elevations. Response: Catch basin numbers, flow directional arrows, and invert/rim elevations have been provided on plans. 23. It appears that the storm line from the school roof, sheet C203, bypasses detention. This is not acceptable. Response: The storm line from the school roof routes runoff to the detention. The footing drain line bypasses the detention. 24. Please review both driveways for safety and navigability for buses and the travelling public. A landing is required per the Federal Way standards, which may need to be adjusted for bus length. Response: Both driveways per the City's request are part of the mini roundabouts at both intersections. Refer to sheet C-508 for the profiles at driveway intersections with roundabouts. 25. Please review both driveways for additional flow control and treatment measures. Neither appears to be addressed. Allowing the storm runoff from such large areas to go uncontrolled may create hazardous walking of driving conditions in very cold weather. If the flow control facility is sized to over -detain to compensate for the driveways or frontage improvements, please document this in the TIR. Integrus TTUHE Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 8 June 21, 2019 Response: Both driveways will be treated by Filterra systems prior to discharging into the public storm systems. Runoff from the driveway is collected prior to the crosswalks and will bypass the flow control facility; the flow control facility is sized to over -detain to compensate for the driveways and bypassed frontage improvements. Refer to TIR for detailed information. Public Right-of-way (600 series) 26. Include utilities in the roadway cross sections. Response: Utilities have been added in the roadway cross sections. See C-500 dwgs. 27. Street lighting and street trees must be shown conceptually for land use approval. Detailed street lighting plans will be required during building permit review. Street trees, with the associated city detail, may be included in the landscape plans. Response: Refer to electrical site plan for street lighting and landscape plans for landscaping within the ROW. 28. Revise street improvements to correspond to the approved right-of-way modification. Response: Frontage improvements on 6th Ave and S 300th Street are designed per Standard Section S as requested by City of Federal Way. Landscape and Irrigation plans have been revised to correspond to the revised street improvements (refer to sheets L200 and 1-300). 29. Overlay requirements, as outlined in the September 14, 2018, DRC letter are for full -width grind and overlay of South 3000, Street. This is based on if open cut is required for the water line connection. Response: Half street Improvements with full depth pavement section and no full street overlay was designed and included in civil plans and TIR per City/Owner/Integrus meeting dated 5/10/2019. 30. When a street is overlaid, ADA requirements are triggered. Upgrades to each leg of the intersection will be required. Response: In coordination with Erik Preston, PE, City's Senior Traffic Engineer, ADA compliant ramps and pedestrian stripping were added at each intersection in conjunction with the City required mini roundabouts. Erik Preston, Public Works — Traffic Division General 1. Additional traffic analysis prepared by engineer licensed in the state of Washington is required for this development project and should include the following analysis missing from the original TIA: • Queuing analysis at the parent drop-off/pick—up driveway. In Legrusruxe Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 9 June 21, 2019 ■ School bus vehicle turning diagram atthe east driveway. ■ Update the school safe walking routes and identify potential mitigation measures. The TIA should also address the project's traffic impacts on the surrounding neighborhood and recommend necessary measures, such as traffic calming devices or other measures as needed, to minimize the projecfs impact resulting from the revised traffic circulation. Response: See attached TIA. See attached School bus turning diagram. See attached safe walking routes memo and map. 2. The information in the SEPA document, traffic report, and plan set should be consistent. For example, the SEPA document and the TIA state different square footage of the proposed school. Response: See attached memo that states the correct square footage 3. The plan set should depict the improvement(s) specified or identified in the SEPA document and traffic report. Response: The plan set indicates the improvements specified 1 identified in the updated SEPA document and traffic report as part of the resubmittal. Plan Set 4. Add the multi -use path connection to neighborhoods to the south and southwest per previous comments, and as required to match the existing school safe walking route plans and block perimeter requirements as required under FWRC 18.55.010 and 19.135.251. This should be a 12-foot paved path with pedestrian -level lighting in a 20-foot tract or right-of-way per Drawing No.3-AA. Response: Per coordination with the City of Federal Way, paved pedestrian connections are provided from the cul-de-sac easements at S 302nd PI and 25th PI S, and 24th PI S. to pedestrian gates on school property. Refer to sheets L103, L104, L404 and L405. See attached site access memo and walking routes map. 5. Realign the west driveway approximately seven feet east to better align with the centerline of 24* Place South (similar to the existing driveway). This will improve traffic flow and also help protect (separate) students walking and waiting on the southwest comer of the driveway from vehicles turning into the driveway. Response: The west driveway was realigned to align with the centerline of 24th Place South. 6. Street trees may need to be removed or relocated in future plans so they do not conflict with streetlight placement. Response: Street trees have been coordinated with light pole locations as shown on L200. 7. Curb bulb -outs will be required on the east and west sides of each school driveway to minimize pedestrian crossing distances, better organize inbound and outbound traffic, and i ntegrus TUBE Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 10 June 21, 2019 restrict parking near the driveways. A raised crosswalk on the west leg of the west driveway is also required. These elements may not be required if mini -roundabouts are constructed. Response: Mini roundabouts were designed as required by the City of Federal Way in coordination with the City's Senior Traffic Engineer, Erik Preston, PE, to minimize pedestrian crossing distances, better organize inbound and outbound traffic, and restrict parking near the driveways. 8. The 28-foot wide street shown in the plan is not wide enough to accommodate on -street parking on one side of the street and two lanes of traffic that include school busses. A right-of- way modification for this cross-section has not been approved. Based on traffic volumes from the TIA (625 ADT), a Type "S" street (36 feet wide) is more appropriate. However, staff may support a modification to approve a 32-foot street (Type "U"), which would provide an eight - foot parking lane and two 12-foot lanes. The complete removal of parking is not preferred by the city and would require a neighborhood meeting with the effected residents, obtaining consensus from those neighbors or the parking removal. Response: Frontage improvements on 6th Ave and S 300th Street are designed per Standard Section S as requested by City of Federal Way. 9. Show the conceptual streetlight design with the South 300", Street frontage improvements. Streetlights built to city standards will be required as part of frontage improvements on South 300"h Street. Response: See Sheet E101 for street lighting plan. 10. The city does not concur with the TIA recommendation to install speed bumps (of humps) on South 300"h Street between 24m Place South and 261h Avenue South (missing from the plans). The grades of the existing street exceed eight percent in these proposed locations, or are in front of residential driveways. To mitigate these issues, the city recommends changing the intersection control at each intersection to mini -roundabouts, which have lower sight distance requirements, help to calm traffic, and provide many safety benefits. Mini -roundabouts are able to be constricted relatively economically as part of other roadway work and can be designed to accommodate school busses. Response: Mini roundabouts were designed in coordination with the City's Senior Traffic Engineer, Erik Preston, PE, to minimize pedestrian crossing distances, better organize inbound and outbound traffic, and restrict parking near the driveways. 11. Provide school bus turning diagrams at the bus driveway to ensure the school bus can enter, maneuver, and leave the site without encroaching onto opposing traffic lanes or mounting a curb. Response: See attached school bus turning diagram at the bus driveway. 12. The on -site parent drop-off and pick up storage must be designed to accommodate the 95"h percentile queue length. Verify that queues will not back up onto South 300"h Street. i`ntegrus,��f Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 11 June 21, 2019 Response: See attached TIA for queuing information and calculations. 13. A mid -block pedestrian path from the walkway between the driveway loops to the new sidewalk on South 300'h Street will be required between 24'* Place South and 26'* Avenue South. Response: Per coordination with the City of Federal Way, pedestrian paths have been provided on either side of both driveway loops to provide pedestrian access from South 300th Street to the school entrance. Refer to sheets C401 and C402. 14. The walking path connecting to South 302^d Place sidewalk near 2511' Place South must be improved to an asphalt hard pavement surface (similar to 3-AA) within the existing right-of-way boundaries (and fencing). Show this improvement on an off -site improvements sheet with other school walking route improvements. Response: Walking path has been improved to asphalt pavement, refer to sheets C-504. 15. Show the minor pavement widening in the northeast comer of the 23,d Avenue South/South 300th Street intersection that is required to create a continuous route for the established and improved recommended walking route. Response: See attached safe walking route map. Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water R Sewer District Water • Lakehaven issued a Water Certificate of Availability for the proposed project/property on February 5, 2019; the certificate is valid for one-year from the date of issuance. • Hydraulic model results (FF #345a) for the proposed onsite water distribution system indicate that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable system liquid velocity of 10 ft/s, at no less than 20 psi, will be exceeded at a fire flow rate above 1,800 GPM. This flow figure depicts the calculated performance of the existing water distribution system under high demand conditions. • A Developer Extension (DE) Agreement was executed between Lakehaven and Federal Way Public Schools on January 9 2019, to manage construction of the proposed onsite water distribution system. However, no water system plans have yet been submitted to Lakehaven to commence the initial DE plan review processes. New onsite water main would connect to the existing water mains in SW 300"h Street. Response: See attached Developer (DE) Agreement and Certificate of Water Availability for Wildwood. Water system design has been submitted to Lakehaven Water and Sewer District. Sewer • Lakehaven issued a Sewer Certificate of Availability for the proposed project/property on February 5, 2019; the certificate is valid for one-year from the date of issuance. integrus,vRE Ms. Natalie Kamieniecki Page 12 June 21, 2019 ■ The applicant has proposed a new sewer service connection to an existing sewer service stub along the south margin of South 300d, Street. ■ A separate Lakehaven Sewer Service Connection Permit is required for each new connection to the sanitary sewer system, or any modification (disconnect, etc.) to an existing sewer service connection, in accordance with standards defined in Lakehaven's current "Fees and Charges Resolution." Response: See attached Certificate of Sewer Availability for Wildwood. Sewer system design has been submitted to Lakehaven Water and Sewer District. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or further clarifications. Sincerely, Sam Schafer, AIA Project Manager INTEGRUS ARCHITECTURE, P.S. Documents: Resubmittal Drawings Revised TIA Revised TIR Subsurface Investigation Report Revised Geotech Report Arsenic and / or Lead Contamination Report Hazardous materials inventory statement, BMPs, and IPM Updated SEPA memos Developer 6denslon Agreement Certificate of Water Availability Certificate of Sewer Avallablllty Geotechnical Report Geotechnical Commend Response Letter Site Development Stormwater Letter from FWPS 4/26/2019 Site Development Stormwater Letter from LPD Underground detention facility outside City Center approval letter Walking Routes Map and Site Access and Safe Routes Memo PC: Natalie Kamieniecki, City of Federal Way, Associate Planner Ray Vefik, Federal Way Public Schools FEDERAL WAY RECEIVED Department of PUBLIC SCHOOLS .SUN 2 4 2019 Maintenance & Operations Department of Ecology ciTv o= Firo� M WAY TO: De P 9Y caMMuNmr DEVELOPMENT FROM: Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations PROJECT: Mirror Lake Elementary School, Lake Grove Elementary School, and Wildwood Elementary School SUBJECT: SEPA Mitigation Measures: The TIA identified additional mitigation measures to reduce the project impacts. DATE: June 24, 2019 This memorandum is regarding the Federal Way Public Schools capital bond projects SEPA Mitigation Measures. Specifically for Lake Grove Elementary School SEPA adding the information that has been identified in the latest TIA report for mitigation measures to reduce the project impacts. Adding the TIA wording to the SEPA for the TIA mitigation measures does not affect the overall compliance and/or does not create significant impacts. As projects move through the design process, there are adjustments to the TIA. In the schematic document phase of this project, the TIA mitigation measures shown in the SEPA were implemented, and as the project continue to evolve through the design process, additional TIA mitigation measures were added to design to reduce the project impacts. In the current construction document phase, these TIA mitigation masures have been included to reduce the project impacts. Therefore, Federal Way Public Schools, making this SEPA modification, by adding this wording change allows the project to be consistent with the construction documents. Mike Benzien Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. 1211 S. 332"d St, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 p.253.945.5930 I f.253.945.59591 www.fwps.org FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO: Department of Ecology Department of Maintenance & Operations FROM: Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations PROJECT: Mirror Lake Elementary School, Lake Grove Elementary School, and Wildwood Elementary School SUBJECT: SEPA Mitigation Measures: The TIA identified additional mitigation measures to reduce the project impacts. DATE: June 24, 2019 This memorandum is regarding the Federal Way Public Schools capital bond projects SEPA Mitigation Measures. Specifically for Lake Grove Elementary School SEPA adding the information that has been identified in the latest TIA report for mitigation measures to reduce the project impacts. Adding the TIA wording to the SEPA for the TIA mitigation measures does not affect the overall compliance and/or does not create significant impacts. As projects move through the design process, there are adjustments to the TIA. In the schematic document phase of this project, the TIA mitigation measures shown in the SEPA were implemented, and as the project continue to evolve through the design process, additional TIA mitigation measures were added to design to reduce the project impacts. In the current construction document phase, these TIA mitigation masures have been included to reduce the project impacts. Therefore, Federal Way Public Schools, making this SEPA modification, by adding this wording change allows the project to be consistent with the construction documents. Mike Benzien Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. 1211 S. 332"d St, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 p.253.945.5930 I f.253.945.59591 www.fwps.org FEDERAL WAY Department of PUBLIC SCHOOLS Maintenance & Operations TO: Department of Ecology FROM: Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations PROJECT: Mirror Lake Elementary School, Lake Grove Elementary School, and Wildwood Elementary School SUBJECT: SEPA Mitigation Measures: The TIA identified additional mitigation measures to reduce the project impacts. DATE: June 24, 2019 This memorandum is regarding the Federal Way Public Schools capital bond projects SEPA Mitigation Measures. Specifically for Lake Grove Elementary School SEPA adding the information that has been identified in the latest TIA report for mitigation measures to reduce the project impacts. Adding the TIA wording to the SEPA for the TIA mitigation measures does not affect the overall compliance and/or does not create significant impacts. As projects move through the design process, there are adjustments to the TIA. In the schematic document phase of this project, the TIA mitigation measures shown in the SEPA were implemented, and as the project continue to evolve through the design process, additional TIA mitigation measures were added to design to reduce the project impacts. In the current construction document phase, these TIA mitigation masures have been included to reduce the project impacts. Therefore, Federal Way Public Schools, making this SEPA modification, by adding this wording change allows the project to be consistent with the construction documents. Mike Benzien Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. 1211 S. 332"d St, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 p.253.945.5930 I f,253.945.59591 www.fwps.org FEDERAL WAY Department of PUBLIC SCHOOLS Maintenance & Operations TO: Department of Ecology FROM: Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations PROJECT: Mirror Lake Elementary School, Lake Grove Elementary School, and Wildwood Elementary School SUBJECT: SEPA Mitigation Measures: The TIA identified additional mitigation measures to reduce the project impacts. DATE: June 24, 2019 This memorandum is regarding the Federal Way Public Schools capital bond projects SEPA Mitigation Measures. Specifically for Lake Grove Elementary School SEPA adding the information that has been identified in the latest TIA report for mitigation measures to reduce the project impacts. Adding the TIA wording to the SEPA for the TIA mitigation measures does not affect the overall compliance and/or does not create significant impacts. As projects move through the design process, there are adjustments to the TIA. In the schematic document phase of this project, the TIA mitigation measures shown in the SEPA were implemented, and as the project continue to evolve through the design process, additional TIA mitigation measures were added to design to reduce the project impacts. In the current construction document phase, these TIA mitigation masures have been included to reduce the project impacts. Therefore, Federal Way Public Schools, making this SEPA modification, by adding this wording change allows the project to be consistent with the construction documents. Mike Benzien Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. 1211 S. 332"d St, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 p.253.945.5930 I f.253.945.59591 www.fwps.org MEMORANDUM DATE: June 20, 2019 "TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest Jurl L 9 LU13 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNrY DEVELOPMENT TO: Ray Vefik, PE, Capital Projects Manager CC: Casey Moore, Project Manager FWPS Support Services Center FROM: Michael J. Read, PE, Principal, TENW NONAT a EXPIRES 2 / 2812021 SUBJECT: Federal Way School District — Wildwood Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis TENW Project No. 3623-6 This memorandum summarizes a traffic impact analysis for the proposed renovation of Federal Way School District's Wildwood Elementary School located at 2405 S 300th Street in Federal Way, WA. This memo includes a project description, a description of existing transportation conditions within the immediate site vicinity, methodology used to derive the trip generation estimate, trip distribution, traffic operational analysis of key off -site intersections and site driveway intersections under cumulative impacts, and identification of any transportation mitigation measures to offset traffic impacts. Project Description The proposed renovation of Federal Way School District's Wildwood Elementary School is located at 2405 S 300th Street in Federal Way, WA. A project site vicinity map is shown in Figure 1. For the purposes of this analysis, year 2020 was the horizon year assumed to evaluate cumulative traffic impacts. The existing gross floor area built at the Wildwood Elementary School comprises of approximately 50,382 square -feet (including the main building and portable structures) and serves approximately 450 students. The proposed gross floor area of the new school is approximately 65,825 square -feet with a student capacity to serve up to 600 students. Therefore, there would be a net increase of approximately 15,443 square -feet and 150 students in student -capacity with the proposed renovation. Existing and proposed site access is provided via two existing site driveways onto S 300th Street. The west site driveway will remain a full -access site driveway. The east site driveway is currently restricted to an exit -only driveway and would be converted to a full -access site driveway with the project. The renovated west parking lot would provide 20 visitor parking stalls and the renovated east parking lot would provide 42 staff parking stalls. As part of the project, roadway frontage improvements would be required along S 300th Street. A conceptual site plan of the project is illustrated in Figure 2. Transportation Planning j Design j Traffic Impact & Operations PO Box 65254, Seattle, WA 98155 1 Office (206) 361-7333 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 9 (Nol to Scale) Federal Way VTENW Figure 1 School District 9- Project Site Vicinity Wildwood Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis I TEN W page 2 June 20, 2019 10-19TENW Federal Way School District — Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300th Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Figure 2 Conceptual Site Plan U lD76 ."J9: 3. 1� R0.h®Bal . <111 VI--- (Not to Scale( Federal Way School District Wildwood Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis G TEN W page 3 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Existing Transportation Conditions This section includes an inventory of existing roadway conditions, key intersections in the site vicinity, existing daily and peak hour traffic volumes, intersection levels of service, nonmotorized facilities and planned roadway improvements. Roadway Conditions The following paragraphs describe existing arterial roadways that would be used for site access. Roadway characteristics are described in terms of number of lanes, posted speed limits, shoulder types and widths. S 300th Street is a two-lane roadway. Adjacent to Wildwood Elementary School, the roadway travel width is approximately 22 feet with sidewalks and rolled curbs on the north side of the street, and an approximate 7-foot shoulder for parking with curb and a 5-foot paved pathway on the south side of the street. West of 24th Place S, the roadway is unchannelized with a 30-foot pavement width between the rolled curb on the north side of the street and curb on the south side of the street. East of 26th Avenue S, curbs, gutters and sidewalks are also provided on the south side of the street. The speed limit is posted at 25 mph with a 20 mph flashing posted speed during school arrival and dismissal periods. A vehicle speed survey was conducted ,June 2018 by lb& Data Solutions on S 300th Street between the West and East Driveway, with a 50th percentile speed of 18 mph, 85th percentile speed of 22 mph and a 95th percentile speed of 25 mph in the eastbound direction, and in the westbound direction, a 50th percentile speed of 19 mph, 85th percentile speed of 22 mph and a 95th percentile speed of 25 mph. 23rd Avenue S is a two-lane minor collector. The roadway is unchannelized with open ditches on both sides of the street south of S 300th Street, with curbs, gutters and sidewalks provided on the west side of the street north of S 300th Street. The total pavement width is approximately 35 feet north of and 22 feet south of S 300th street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. 24th Place S is a two-lane unchannelized roadway with foot sidewalks rolled curbs on both Sides of the street. The total pavement width is approximately 28 feet. The speed limit is posted at 25 mph. 26th Avenue S is a two-lane unchannelized roadway with a total pavement width of approximately 27 feet, with sidewalks and rolled curbs on both sides of the street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Traffic Study Intersections The following intersections were analyzed during the AM and PM peak hour: IVTEN W page 4 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 1. S 300th Street / 23rd Avenue S 2. S 300th Street / 24th Place S / West Driveway 3. S 300th Street / 26th Avenue S / East Driveway Existing Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Peak hour traffic volumes represent the highest hourly volume of vehicles passing through an intersection during a typical 7-9 AM and 4-6 PM weekday peak period. Average weekday daily traffic counts and peak period turning movement counts were conducted during the AM and PM peak hour in June 2018 by lolax Data Solutions during the 7-9 AM, 4-6 PM at off -site study intersections and at 2-6 PM periods at school driveway intersections. Figure 3 summarizes existing daily, AM and PM peak period turning movements at the study intersections. Traffic counts are provided in Attachment A. During the p.m. peak hour, please note that all study intersections, including the off -site study intersection W) was analyzed based upon the weekday p.m. peak hour of the generator for the proposed project (peak dismissal time for one hour between 2:30 to 3:30 p.m.) as this was determined to be the p.m. peak hour for all study intersections. Existing Intersection Levels of Service Intersection levels of service (LOS) analyses were conducted at the study intersections during the weekday AM and PM peak hour of 2018 existing conditions. LOS refers to the degree of congestion on a roadway or intersection. It is a measure of vehicle operating speed, travel time, travel delays, and driving comfort. A letter scale from A to F generally describes LOS. At signalized intersections, LOS A represents free -flow conditions -motorists experience little or no delays, and LOS F represents forced -flow conditions -motorists experience an average delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. The LOS reported for signalized intersections represents the average control delay per vehicle entering the intersection. The LOS reported at stop -controlled intersections is also based on the average control delay (sec/veh) and is reported for each movement. Therefore, the reported LOS at unsignalized intersections does not represent a measure of the overall operations of the intersection. LOS calculations for both signalized and stop -controlled intersections were calculated using the methodologies and procedures outlined in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual IHCMJ, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board (TRB). Table 1 outlines the LOS criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections based on these methodologies. The City of Federal Way's LOS standard is a v/c ratio of 1.2 for signalized intersections and 1.0 for unsignalized intersections. Existing AM and PM peak hour LOS analyses are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. As shown, all intersections operate at LOS B or better with a v/c ratio under 1.0 during the AM and PM peak hour under 2018 existing conditions. Detailed LOS summary worksheets are included in Attachment B. TEN W page 5 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis S 300Ih SI/2-41h PI 5 Wes! plies o S 3001h SI/23rd Ave S s 1t— 12 (21 f 10J 1171 1271 11113) 7 f 1 f8) F 29 131) 0 17 14 <— 9 114) �, 1, r 18 129) 1, 43 (541 i saoo1hsr (5J 10� iR S 298th St (1)0--4 y� I19)21--0, 3 20 11 13 S3W1hSU26IhAve S (27) 15 —� 2 5 17 44 (126) 38 -� $ 154J J221 127) Eoif ghVpwp 111 4 n (31 18) (98) 3V" 9 (2) to 1 7 -0--30(371 h � 625 sans > (4) 12--$ � 140139 6 20 1 11 1 1221 191 f15) a. `N � S 300th St S 3001h St N Wildwood Elementary N S 3015t,5t School N S 302nd St S 3132nd PI h m � l N h � N d a s � N N ' S 304th St y Legend 45 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (65) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 5,000 Daily Traffic Volumes [Not to ScoL) Federal Way Figure 3 School District TE NW2018 Existing Daily, AM, PM Wildwood Elementary Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Schaal Traffic Impact Analysis T TEN W page 6 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Table 1 Level of Service Criteria for Intersections Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Average Delay Range (sec) Delay Range (sec) A <-10 <-10 B >10to:520 >10to<-15 C >20to-<35 >15to:-25 D >35to:-55 >25to<35 E >55to:-80 >35to<-50 F >80 >50 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010. Table 2 2018 Existina AM Peak Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection LOS Delay (sec) V/C Ratio nsignalized Intersections # 1 - S 300th St / 23rd Ave S AWS A 7.8 0.29 #2 - S 3001h St / 24'h PI S / West Driveway EB A 7.4 0.00 #3 - S 300th St / 26th Ave S / East Driveway W B A 7.8 0.03 NB Left B 12.7 0.24 SB Left B 12.7 0.03 EB j A 7.3 0.00 W B I A 0.0 0.00 NB Left A 9.9 0.07 SB Lefl A 9.2 0.01 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010. Table 3 2018 Existina PM Peak Intersection Levels of Service Study Intersection LOS Delay (sec) V/C Ratio Unsignolized Intersections # 1 - S 300'h St / 23rd Ave S AWS A 7.7 0.30 #2 - S 300th St / 24th PI S / West Driveway EB A 7.8 0.02 #3 - S 300th St / 26th Ave S / East Driveway W B A 8.0 0.03 NB Left B 13.4 0.17 SB Left B 13.1 0.10 EB A 7.6 0.02 W B A 0.0 0.00 NB Left B 11.7 0.11 SB Left B 10.5 0.06 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010. IV TEN W page 7 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Nonmotodzed Facilities Sidewalks or paved pedestrian pathways are located on S 300th Street, 24th Place S and 26th Avenue S. Marked crosswalks are located along all intersections of S 300th Street at the north and east legs of 23rd Avenue S, at the north, south and west legs of 24th Place S / West Driveway, and at north, south and east legs of 26th Avenue S / East Driveway. Planned Transportation Improvements No planned transportation capacity improvements impacting Wildwood Elementary School based were identified in the City of Federal Way's 20782023 Transportation Improvement Program. Existing Sight Distance Field work was conducted by TENW along S 300th Street on Monday, ,June 11, 2018. Driver entering sight distance at the West Driveway onto S 300ih Street is approximately 270 feet to the west and 195 feet to the east and at the East Driveway onto S 300th Street is .approximately 200 feet to the west and greater than 600 feet to the east given a sharp vertical curve between the two site driveways. Assuming a 20 mph design speed on S 300th Street (during peak arrival/dismissal periods), based upon AASHTO design requirements, a minimum of 225 feet is required for entering sight distance and 115 feet is required for design stopping sight distance for left -turns (AASHTO Green Book, Exhibit 9-55. Design Intersection Sight Distance — Case B1 — Left Turn from Stop) Therefore, the West and East Driveways onto S 300th Street do not meet minimum AASHTO entering sight distance requirements, but minimum stopping sight distance is provided for a 25 mph design speed and a downslope of 9 percent grade along S 300th Street (in excess of 175 feet) that provides for a minimum level of safety. Traffic Impact Analysis The following section describes projected future baseline traffic growth, new trips generated by the proposed development, distribution and assignment of new project trips, intersection level of service and daily traffic volume impacts, nonmotorized impacts, site access, safety and circulation issues, and identification of transportation mitigation to offset impacts. 2020 Baseline Traffic Volumes Full buildout of the project is anticipated for the year 2020. Existing traffic counts estimated in 2018 were factored by 3 percent per year to estimate daily, a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes under 2020 baseline conditions without the project. Future traffic volume estimates are provided in Attachment C. GeTEN W page 8 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District- Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Project Trip Generation Per published trip generation rates within the Trip Generation Manual, loth Edition, 2017, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), for Land Use Code 520 - Elementary School, there is no correlative basis to derive estimated changes in vehicle trip generation based on changes in floor area, but better evidence of correlation on daily trips and significantly higher number of studies based on student population. Based on TENW's extensive experience in reviewing K- 12, private schools, and numerous community colleges throughout the Pacific Northwest, the best correlative predictor of increase traffic demand is student enrollment at school institutions. As such, as shown in Table 4, based on the net increase of approximately 150 students, the net increase in vehicle trips on a daily basis is estimated at 284 daily trips, with approximately 98 new trips generated during peak arrival periods (AM Peak Hour of Generator), 51 new trips generated during peak dismissal periods (PM Peak Hour of Generator), and 26 new vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic (i.e., the worse -case scenario). Table 4 Wildwood Elementary School Trip Generation Summary Time Period in Out Total Weekday Daily 142 142 284 Weekday AM Peak Hour of Generator 53 45 98 Weekday PM Peak Hour of Generator 23 28 51 Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic 12 14 26 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 1 Oth Edition, 2017 Trip Distribution and Assignment Project trip distribution is based upon traffic counts that were conducted in ,June 2018 during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour at all off -site and site driveway study intersections. Generally, distribution and assignment of project trips were assumed as follows: ➢ 25 percent north via 23rd Avenue S 24th Place S and 26th Avenue S; ➢ 40 percent south via 23rd Avenue S; ➢ 10 percent west via S 300th Street; and ➢ 25 percent east via S 300th Street. Figure 4 illustrates trip distribution and Figure 5 shows the daily, a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour trip assignment at the study intersections during the 2020 horizon year. Figures 6 and 7 summarize daily, a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour traffic volume impacts of the proposed renovation of Federal Way School District's Wildwood Elementary School project in 2020. -I TEN W page 9 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District- Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis V9- TENW1Figure 4 Project Trip Distribution 9 (Not to Scale) Federal Way School District Wildwood Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis IV TEN W page 10 June 20, 2019 S 3001h St/23rd Ave S (5) 3 (5) 2 t— 3 (5) l It (la) a 5 300th 5i d p)2� < 9 N 1211 alN S 300th St Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300th Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis $ 3Wth West S1124th Pl S rxlvewa a y �t131 _aRhs�+ ] t 1 (Sj2i4 (271 12 1Z 1231 (5) 12) CL L N 45 N S 298th St 5 3001h S1/261h Ave S Eosf €]r�vervn (1 c F 1 (3) �5(111 5 yqv, t: 12)1� I t (5) 2 f51 (2) (91 Wildwood Q Elementary N School M N S 302nd SI S 300th Si' a 0 S 302nd PI y y �ifl Q1 7 a y N [V d L L 0V C4 N N S 304th St Legend 45 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (65) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 5,000 Daily Traffic Volumes (Not to Scale( Federal Way Figure 5 School District TE NW Daily, AM & PM Peak Hour Wildwood Elementary Project Trip Assignment School Traffic Impact Analysis TEN W page 11 June 20, 2019 S 300th St/23rd Ave S (34) 14 IT8) 0 118 29 F 15(191 ,1 (y 57 (75) i 5 3001h SI T� (341 29 --I� ¢ 3 8 104 I N 1125, S 300th St N Q Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300th Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 3 30f71;1EMIR west PJ S Drivewoy s 2 1371 2 32 3 <— 33 (371 31 s{s31 7uWnJ>a� 5 s R t 1 (251 20 --io- 1 a 57 23 29 1160) 134 2 i80) (281 131) S 302nd St S 304th St �I S 298th St () 4 , w-2 66 I1I3 F 39142) 660 /r 1 1►h Ar- c (,I lj nsr (705) 4 ; � T 145)42 23 10 16 N (5) 0 (281 112) (25) S 300th St rn Wildwood L Elementary N School S 302nd PI 3_ L2L s �71 r�V ti. Legend 45 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Without Project (65) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Project 5,000 Daily Traffic Volumes Without Projecf (5,000) Doily Traffic Volumes With Project (Not 10 Scale) Federal Way Figure 6 School District VT E NW 2020 Daily and AM Peak Wildwood Elementary Hour Traffic Volume Impacts School Traffic Impact Analysis T TENW page 12 June 20, 2019 S 3001h St/23rd Ave S 1 11 (1B) i215 12 () 0 F 10 i141 .l 1 4654) i i� 51300]h Sl 11}0 ..,� t 1 (27) Ib -c 5 18 47 111 4 131 (e) 198l ,n N Q S 300th St to W Q CO N S 302nd St SO4 th ; Federal Way School District- Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300th Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Legend 45 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Without Project (65) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Project 9 INo: 10 Scale} Figure 7 Federal Way School District VO T E NW 2020 PM M Peak Hour Wildwood Elementary Traffic Volume Impacts School Traffic Impact Analysis T TEN W page 13 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Intersection Level of Service and Daily Traffic Volume Impacts Tables 5 and 6 summarize level of service impacts in 2020 assuming full buildout of the proposed renovation of Federal Way School District's Wildwood Elementary School project. As shown, all study intersections are projected to operate at LOS C or better with a v/c ratio under 1.0 during the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour with or without the project in 2020. Detailed LOS summary worksheets are included in Attachment B. Daily traffic volumes on S 300th Street between 24th Place S and 26th Avenue S would increase by about 45 vehicles with the project in 2020. Table 5: 2020 AM Peak Intersection Level of Service Impacts -Study Intersection 2020 Without Project Delay v/C LOS isccj Ratio 2020 With Project Delay V/C LOS sec Ratio Unsignalized Intersections # 1 - S 300th St / 231d Ave S AWS A 7.9 0.29 A 8.2 0.40 #2 - S 300th St / 24th PI S / West Driveway EB A 7.4 0.01 -- W B A 7.9 0.03 -- - NB Left B 13.1 0.25 -- -- -- SB Left j B 13.0 0.10 - - Roundabout -- -- -- A 5.6 0.24 #3 - S 300th St / 26th Ave S / East Driveway EB A 7.3 0.00 -- W B A 0.0 0.00 -- -- - NB Left A 9.9 0.07 -- SB Left A 9.2 0.01 - -- -- Roundabout -- -- A 4.2 0.07 Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010. Table 6: 2020 PM Peak Intersection Level of Service Impacts 2020 Without Project 2020 With Project Delay V/C Delay v/C Study Intersection LOS (sec) Ratio LOS (sec) Ratio llnsianalized Intersections # 1 - S 300th St / 23rd Ave S A 7.8 0.31 A 8.0 0.31 AWS #2 - S 300th St / 24th PI S / West Driveway A 7.8 0.02 - EB , W B A 8.0 0.03 - - -- NB Left B 13.8 0.18 SB Left B 14.0 0.11 - -- Roundabout -- -- - A 5.3 0.16 #3 - S 300th St / 26th Ave S / East Driveway A 7.7 0.02 - -- EB W B A 0.0 0.00 NB Left B 11.9 0.12 - SB Left B 10.5 0.06 - -- Roundabout -- -- A 4.8 0.11 *'TEN W page 14 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis Source: "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2010. Nonmotorized Impacts As part of the proposed project, raised sidewalks would be provided along the school property frontage on S 300th Street. Marked crosswalks and speed bump crosswalks on S 300th Street along the school property frontage would remain the same. Site Access and Safety Issues Existing and proposed site access is provided via two existing site driveways onto S 300th Street. The west site driveway will remain a full -access site driveway. The east site driveway is currently restricted to an exit -only driveway and would be converted to a full -access site driveway with the project. The renovated west parking lot would provide 20 visitor parking stalls and the renovated east parking lot would provide 42 staff parking stalls. Within the west parking lot, site circulation would travel in a one-way counterclockwise loop. Within the east parking lot, traffic circulation would be provided two ways within the parking lot. Site circulation within these parking lots is shown in Figure 2. As part of the project, roadway frontage improvements to include curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping would be required along S 300th Street, which could also require right-of-way dedication. All site driveway intersections would operate with a v/c ratio under 1.0 during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour with the project in 2020. The West and East Driveways onto S 300th Street do not meet minimum AASHTO entering sight distance requirements, but minimum stopping sight distance is provided for a 25 mph design speed and a downslope of 9 percent grade along S 300th Street (in excess of 175 feet) that provides for a minimum level of safety. Due to sight distance issues at the project site driveways, the City of Federal Way has requested that roundabouts be installed at the West and East Driveways onto S 300th Street to minimize travel speeds on S 300ih Street. Queuing Analysis and Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off Loading Areas There are no existing queuing issues during the AM peak hour as vehicle arrivals and departures are staggered in the morning when students are dropped off before school begins and there are also adequate available loading area lengths on -site. Queuing issues on S 300th Street and internally within the site were primarily due to vehicles parking too close to the intersection or double parking on S 300th Street and preventing other vehicles from getting around them during the PM peak hour. At Intersection #2 — S 300th Street / 26th Avenue S / East Driveway, with the proposed redevelopment, queues during the AM peak hour are anticipated to be about 1 vehicle in the westbound direction and 2 vehicles in the eastbound direction during the AM peak hour and about 1 vehicle in the westbound and eastbound direction during the PM peak hour with the project in 2020. There are no anticipated queuing issues at Intersection #3 - S 300th Street / 24th Place S / West Driveway. I TEN W page 15 June 20, 2019 Federal Way School District - Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis It should be noted that 95th percentile queue lengths for all stop -controlled movements at the site driveway intersections onto S 300th Street estimate queue lengths to be less than 50 feet or 2 vehicles during the AM and PM peak hour with the project in 2020. There is approximately 550 feet of on -site storage for queued vehicles at the current student pick-up/drop-off located in the west parking lot of Wildwood Elementary. Based upon observations, an additional 5 vehicles were observed to be queued during peak dismissal periods within the parking lot. As such, the existing school vehicle queue peaks with approximately 650 feet. With the proposed development, an additional demand of 3 queued vehicles would increase this to approximately 710 feet. The redeveloped west parking lot would provide a primary curb student load/unload area of 520 feet with dual vehicle queuing lanes beyond the curbside pickup area of 100 each to provide approximately 720 feet in length. As such, adequate on -site vehicle queue storage to meet project peak demand would be provided. School Safe Walk Route Figure 8 shows safe walk routes within a 1-mile radius of Wildwood Elementary School. A crossing guard should be provided during school arrival and dismissal periods at the East Driveway onto S 300th Street. There are no mitigation measures as students would be able to safely travel along sidewalks on S 300th Street and use crosswalks to provide to the school. Project Mitigation A review of traffic impacts to intersection levels of service, site access, and circulation issues was conducted in association with the Wildwood Elementary School in Federal Way, WA. The following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce or eliminate project impacts: ➢ The City of Federal Way assesses a traffic impact fee rate of $2.00 per new square - foot of floor area for elementary schools (2018 Federal Way Impact Fee and Components). Based upon a net increase of 15,443 square feet (50,382 square feet existing and 65,825 square feet future), Wildwood Elementary School would be assessed a traffic impact fee of $30,886. The final fee would be determined at building permit issuance. ➢ The applicant would be required to construct the necessary frontage improvements along S 300th Street to include curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscaping, which could also include right -of --way donation. ➢ Install roundabouts at the East and West driveways onto S 300th Street per the City of Federal Way's request to minimize travel speeds on S 300th Street in order to meet minimum sight distance requirements. ➢ A crossing guard should be provided during school arrival and dismissal periods at the East Driveway onto S 300th Street. If you have any questions regarding the information presented in this memo, please call me at (206) 361-7333 x 101 or mikereadMenw.com. T TEN W page 16 June 20, 2019 t DONPO st \ • oz Federal Way School District — Wildwood Elementary School 2045 S 300m Street, Federal Way, WA Traffic Impact Analysis 9 �f ►.i7ii.lf�iiji%� ..,, N ,............R W nawaoa Elementary School U 1 SchxlS of Frdcral 0 &mru Legend ...... Walk Route: Sidewalk or Shoulder with Raised Curb son, - Walk Route: Shoulder Only ...... Walk Route: Little or No Shoulder Crosswalk Crossing Guord(s) Slop Sign Traffic Signal School Speed Zone Federal Way '19- T E N W Figure 8 School District School Safe Walk Route WntarySd Elementary School Traffic Impact Analysis TEN W page 17 June 20, 2019 ATTACHMENT A Daily, AM & PM Peak Traffic Counts V TENW www.idaxdata.com 21 23RD AVE S wa), S 300TH ST Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour: 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM N LU iln A r. r, 0 .- N O� 1 L U 5 300TH ST Y L 0 13 3 1 � TEV: 263 4� 14 � 81 O 2> 27-4 PHF: 0.76 1 S 300TH STn n t 54 0 —� 152 � 0 r. TI 6 <AHM.., r- �1 t: cn t. O Nf 00 W Q O HV %.: PHF EB 6.9% 0.60 N es WB 1.2% 0.53 h� n n NB 7.3% 0.59 SB 0.0% 0.85 TOTAL 4.2% 0.76 'Two -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST 23RD AVE S 23RD AVE S Interval 1 Rolling Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Total One Hour UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 4 0 12 0 7:15AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 8 0 7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 2 0 14 0 7:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 6 4 0 33 67 8:00 AM 0 0 6 0 0 9 6 2 0 1 2 26 0 7 4 0 63 118 8:15 AM 0 0 12 0 0 13 2 3 0 2 1 43 0 6 4 0 86 196 8:30 AM 0 1 6 1 0 24 6 8 0 0 3 19 0 8 5 0 81 263 8:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 9 1 0 0 0 2 6 0 1 3 0 24 254 Count Total 0 1 30 3 0 65 16 13 0 3 17 118 0 28 27 0 321 0 Peak Hour 0 1 27 1 0 54 14 13 0 3 8 96 0 27 17 0 263 1 0 Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 5 8 6:15AM 2 0 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 6 8:30 AM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 O 0 1 0 1 0 2 8:45 AM 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 Count Total 2 4 10 0 16 1 1 0 0 2 6 2 9 6 23 Peak Hour 2 1 8 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 8 6 20 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 22 WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY ' S 300TH ST t dwl 10�4 Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour: 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM � CV)N f jC%1 C4 P7 J 1 0 O 5 3DOTHST to p i 31 62 0 5 TEV: 350 15� 19 "gyp PHF: 0.73 28 -� 50 o ro 4 40 00 `� 126 r 1 S 300TH ST n t r � a 12 V N ©HV F %: PHFEB 5.3% 0.65 010 WB 1.6% 0.67 NB 0.0% 0.48 SB 8.6% 0.55 TOTAL 3.4% 0.73 'Two -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY 24TH PL S Interval 15-min Rolling Start Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total One Hour LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT 7:00 AM 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 0 7:15AM 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 9 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 13 0 7:45 AM 0 0 1 18 0 5 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 44 77 8:00 AM 0 1 5 32 0 11 11 1 0 6 3 2 0 0 5 1 78 144 8:15 AM 0 2 9 47 D 5 4 0 0 15 10 12 0 2 14 0 120 255 8:30 AM 0 2 4 29 1 7 4 1 0 32 9 13 0 0 5 1 108 350 8:45 AM 0 1 0 7 0 6 9 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 3 0 32 338 Count Total 0 6 23 148 1 36 43 4 0 56 23 27 0 6 40 2 1 415 1 0 Peak Hour 0 5 19 126 1 28 31 2 1 0 54 22 27 1 0 3 30 2 1 350 0 Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7:15AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 6 8:15AM 6 0 0 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 8 17 8:30 AM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 8:45 AM 0 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 Count Total 9 4 0 3 16 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 19 0 15 34 Peak Hour 8 1 0 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 12 30 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 23 WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY S 300TH ST N Peak Hour o N Q m � N 0 4 TEV: 40 PHF: 44 0 S 300TH ST� n Two -Hour Count Summaries M O 2 139 4­ 37 0.85 0 t 0 or Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Peak Hour: 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM HV %: PHF EB 0.0% WB 0.0% NB 19.6% SB 0.0% TOTAL 6.5% 0.55 0.70 0.61 0.50 0.85 r A o L A 2p 00 13 V t S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY 26TH AVE S Interval 1 Rolling Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Total One Hour LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7:15AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 11 1 4 0 0 1 1 23 35 8:00 AM 0 1 5 0 0 0 14 0 0 9 3 7 0 0 0 1 40 72 8:15 AM 0 0 20 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 4 1 0 3 0 2 41 109 8:30 AM 0 3 15 0 0 0 9 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 2 35 139 8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 10 3 2 0 1 0 0 23 139 Count Total 0 4 44 0 0 0 47 3 0 34 12 18 0 4 1 7 174 0 Peak Hour 0 4 40 0 0 0 37 2 0 22 9 15 0 3 1 6 139 0 Note: Two-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Start EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7:15AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 8 8:15AM 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 3 10 8:30 AM 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 7 8:45 AM 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 1 0 12 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 2 15 27 Peak Hour 1 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 2 13 25 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 21 23RD "E S 300TH ST wa�rS A Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 2:00 PM to 6:00 PM Peak Hour: 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM r No0 �+J tl) A Q O r r O R US 300TH ST O 1 0 11 1�00�01_...] 0 TEV: 179 9 n za i p 0 4 a Cn O) 119 15 �1 PHF: 0.66 43 —� o `V 4 0 73 _ 0 �. �= 4 V S 300TH ST n n i 0 o n o F HV %: PHF EB 15.8% 0.59 WB 12.7% 0.46 0� Co NB 4.5% 0.72 SB 0.0% 0.86 TOTAL 7.8% 0.66 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST 23RD AVE S 23RD AVE S Interval 15-min Rolling Start Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total One Hour UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 1 3 6 0 5 4 0 26 0 2:45 PM 0 0 6 2 0 5 0 1 0 1 6 16 0 2 5 0 44 0 3:00 P.M 0 0 4 1 0 23 6 5 0 2 3 15 0 5 4 0 68 0 3:15 PM 1 0 0 3 7 1 0 11 3 4 1 0 1 5 7 1 0 2 4 0 1 41 1 179 Peak Hour 1 0 0 15 4 1 0 43 9 11 1 0 5 17 44 O 14 17 0 1 179 0 Note: For all three-hour count summary, see next page. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 2:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 O 4 0 9 3:00 PM 2 7 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 15 0 35 3:15PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 5 4 16 Peak Hour 3 8 3 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 29 3 24 4 60 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 21 Four -Hour Count Summaries 5 300TH ST S 300TH ST 23RD AVE S 23RD AVE S Interval 1 Rolling Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start Total One Hour UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 3 ❑ 0 0 2 3 5 0 1 2 1 18 0 2:15PM 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 5 0 0 4 0 19 0 2:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 3 6 0 5 4 0 26 0 2:45 PM 0 0 6 2 0 5 0 1 0 1 6 16 0 2 5 0 44 107 3:00 PM 0 0 4 1 0 23 6 5 a 2 3 15 0 5 4 0 68 157 3:15 PM 0 0 3 1 0 11 3 4 0 1 5 7 0 2 4 0 41 179 3:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 2 0 0 3 2 0 1 1 1 17 170 3:45 PM 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 7 0 20 146 4:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 0 2 0 15 93 4:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 7 3 0 1 1 5 1 0 1 1 0 21 73 4:30 PM 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0_ 0 2 6 0 0 2 0 16 72 4:45 PM 0 0 1 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 3 0 16 68 5:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 10 13 0 0 4 1 36 89 515 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 4 14 0 2 4 0 33 101 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 4 8 0 0 6 0 23 108 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 3 1 1 0 7 0 17 109 Count Total 0 4 23 9 0 82 22 15 2 11 72 107 1 19 60 3 430 0 Peak Hour 0 0 15 4 0 43 9 11 1 0 5 17 44 0 14 17 0 179 0 Note: Four-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SIB Total East West North South Total Start 2:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 PM 1 0 O 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 9 3:00 PM 2 7 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 15 0 35 3:15PM 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 5 4 16 3:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 13 4:00 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Count Total 6 9 5 0 20 2 0 1 0 3 41 3 30 6 80 Peak Hour 3 8 3 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 29 3 24 4 60 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 22 WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY S 300TH ST wa)( A Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 2:00 PM to 6:00 PM Peak Hour: 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM m r� N Ih IL 410 J 1 toU$ S 300TH ST 0 = - 12 � 9 n $ 0 10 TEV: 198 4— 29 PHF: 0.52 � 5 � v r� []� 69 21 17 38 1 43 0 .••► V 10 S 300TH ST 11 1 r MUM- T 00 � to N O Fwo HV %: PHF 0 co EB 8.7% 0.75 WB 15.3% 0.51 roONB 0.0% 0.31 SB 11.5% 0.81 TOTAL 9.1 % 0.52 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES WEST W DY 24TH PL S Interval 15-min Rolling Start Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total One Hour LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT 2:30 PM 0 0 4 9 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 29 0 2:45 PM 0 2 10 7 1 3 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 4 2 35 0 3:00 PM 0 5 6 12 0 5 15 9 0 13 11 11 0 5 3 0 95 0 3:15 PM 0 3 1 10 0 5 9 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 39 198 Peak Hour 0 10 21 38 1 17 29 12 1 0 20 11 13 0 8 11 7 1 198 0 Note: For all three-hour count summary, see next page. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 2:30 PM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 6 2:45 PM 1 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 9 3:00 PM 3 7 0 O 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 7 6 63 3:15PM 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 Peak Hour 1 6 9 0 3 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 64 8 10 83 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 22 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES WEST DWY 24TH PL S Interval 15-min Rolling Start Eastbound Westbound Northbound Souhbound Total One Hour UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:00 PM 0 2 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 2:15PM 0 1 2 3 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 2:30 PM 0 0 4 9 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 29 0 2:45 PM 0 2 10 7 1 3 2 0 0 2 0 1 O 1 4 2 35 86 3:00 PM 0 5 6 12 0 5 15 9 0 13 11 11 0 5 3 0 95 170 3:15 PM 0 3 1 10 0 5 9 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 2 39 198 3:30 PM 0 0 2 3 0 1 4 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 182 3:45 PM 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 152 4:00 PM 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 9 66 4:15 PM 0 2 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 18 45 4:30 PM 0 1 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 14 46 4:45 PM 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 14 55 5:00 PM 0 0 4 10 1 5 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 28 74 5:15 PM 0 1 4 11 1 10 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 39 95 5:30 PM 0 1 1 6 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 17 98 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 7 91 Count Total 0 20 39 83 4 41 66 16 0 33 17 21 0 12 19 13 384 0 Peak Hour L 0 10 21 38 1 17 29 12 0 20 11 13 0 8 11 7 198 0 Note: Four-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Start EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total 2:00 PM 1 ❑ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 2:30 PM 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 6 2:45PM 1 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 9 3:00 PM 3 7 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 7 6 61 3:15PM 1 1 O 0 2 O 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 5 3:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 7 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 2 Count Total 10 10 0 3 23 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 77 12 12 103 Peak Hour 6 9 0 3 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 64 8 10 83 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 23 WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY ' S 300TH ST A Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018 N Peak Hour Count Period: 2:00 PM to 6:00 PM Peak Hour: 2:30 PM to 3:30 PM Of N � N IS Y o rn o 3013TH 1 to U ST I o 1 30 � A 10 • � � ' 0 12 TEV: 141 PHF: 0.48 "' v o 51 39 p 0 _� 57 o 0 0 -+ ``� y 0 S 300TH ST� t r 14 C3 >_ T N t. p F HV %: PHF EB 0.0% 0.40 WB 2.6% 0.61 o Cn NB 34.4% 0.53 SB 0.0% 0.34 TOTAL 8.5% 0.48 Four -Hour Count Summaries Interval S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY 26TH AVE S Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Start 15-min Total Rolling One Hour LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT LIT LT TH RT 2:30 PM 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 19 0 2:45 PM 0 6 2 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 0 3:00 PM 0 4 28 0 0 0 14 2 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 10 74 0 3:15 PM 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 6 2 0 9 1 5 1 0 2 0 0 30 141 Peak Hour 1 0 12 39 0 0 0 30 9 0 20 1 11 0 7 0 12 1 141 1 0 Note: For all three-hour count summary, see next page. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total Start 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2:45PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 D 2 14 3:00 PM 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 34 1 9 8 52 3:15PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 6 Peak Hour 0 1 11 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 47 3 10 14 74 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com www.idaxdata.com 23 Four -Hour Count Summaries S 300TH ST S 300TH ST WILDWOOD ES EAST DWY 26TH AVE S Interval Start 15-min Total Rolling One Hour Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT UT LT TH RT 2:00 PM 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2:15PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 2:30 PM 0 1 5 0 0 0 5 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 19 0 2:45 PM 0 6 2 0 0 0 5 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 16 49 3:00 PM 0 4 28 0 0 0 14 2 0 7 0 5 0 4 0 10 74 119 3:16 PM 0 1 4 0 0 0 6 2 0 9 1 5 0 2 0 0 30 141 3:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 1 3 0 1 0 0 13 135 3:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 120 4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 51 4:15 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 11 32 4:30 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 13 32 4:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 39 5:00 PM 1 3 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 2 2 4 0 1 0 2 22 56 5:15 PM 0 2 1 0 0 0 11 1 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 25 70 5:30 PM 0 1 2 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 12 69 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9 68 Count Total 2 19 56 0 1 1 72 14 0 44 7 32 0 12 0 16 276 0 Peak Hour 0 12 39 0 0 0 30 9 0 20 1 11 0 7 0 12 141 0 Note: Four-hour count summary volumes include heavy vehicles but exclude bicycles in overall count. Interval Heavy Vehicle Totals Bicycles Pedestrians (Crossing Leg) Start EB WB NB SB Total EB WB NB SB Total East West North South Total 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 PM 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 2 14 3:00 PM 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 34 1 9 8 52 3:15PM O 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 6 3:30PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 6 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 1 13 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 47 7 12 22 88 Peak Hour 0 1 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 47 3 10 14 74 Mark Skaggs: (425) 250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWW WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 - 6/18/2018 Site Code: 08 WZ0, DATA SOLUTIONS Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday 6/1212018 6/13/2018 6/14/2018 W1512018 6/16/2018 6/17/2018 6/18/2018 Mld-Weak Average Time EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total ES WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 2 2 1:00 AM 0 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 3:00 AM 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 4:00 AM 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 3 5 1 2 3 5:00 AM 4 3 7 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 2 5 6:00 AM 4 9 13 4 3 7 3 3 6 4 5 9 7:00 AM 5 27 32 9 32 41 6 29 35 7 29 36 8:00 AM 44 82 126 33 76 109 43 78 121 40 79 119 9:00 AM 4 20 24 1 13 14 1 26 27 2 20 22 10:00 AM 11 16 27 4 12 16 3 19 22 6 16 22 11:00 AM 3 47 50 4 18 22 6 34 40 4 33 37 12:00 PM 10 35 45 11 21 32 6 23 29 9 26 35 1:00 PM 9 18 27 4 25 29 4 18 22 6 20 26 2:00 PM 19 30 49 9 35 44 19 27 46 16 31 46 3:00 PM 32 75 107 29 67 96 40 62 102 34 66 102 4:00 PM 12 20 32 10 32 42 8 24 32 10 25 35 5:00 PM 8 56 64 11 36 47 7 7 14 9 33 42 6:00 PM 15 35 50 12 25 37 7 8 15 11 23 34 7:00 PM 4 13 17 6 23 29 6 7 13 5 14 20 8:00 PM 6 4 10 1 9 10 4 3 7 4 5 9 9:00 PM 2 6 10 1 6 7 5 10 15 3 8 11 10:00 PM 4 4 8 1 4 5 2 2 4 2 3 6 11:00 PM 2 1 3 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 Total 201 509 710 155 442 597 178 390 568 178 447 625 Percent 28% 72°/6 26% 74% 31% 69% 28% 72% 1. Mid -week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday. Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Vehicle Speed Report Summary Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Count Direction: Eastbound / Westbound Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 owl DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) Total 0-10 10 -15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume Study Total Eastbound 31 113 216 153 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 534 Percent 5.8% 21.2% 40.4% 28.7% 3.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100% Westbound 21 215 627 420 56 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,341 Percent 1.6% 16.0% 46.8% 31.3% 4.2% 0.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100% Total 52 328 843 573 77 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,875 Percent 2.8% 17.5% 45.0% 30.6% 4.1 % 0.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100% Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics Eastbound Eastbound 50th Percentile (Median) 18.0 mph Mean (Average) Speed 17.7 mph 85th Percentile 22.3 mph 10 mph Pace 12.3 - 22.3 mph 95th Percentile 24.7 mph Percent in Pace 74.2 % Westbound Westbound 50th Percentile (Median) 18.7 mph Mean (Average) Speed 18.6 mph 85th Percentile 22.3 mph 10 mph Pace 13.4 - 23.4 mph 95th Percentile 24.5 mph Percent in Pace 80.8 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Tuesday, June 12, 2018 Eastbound ■ r DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) _ Total Time 0-10 10 -15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6:00 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 AM 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8:00 AM 1 5 29 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 9:00 AM 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10:00 AM 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11:00 AM 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12:00 PM 0 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1:00 PM 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2:00 PM 3 6 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 3:00 PM 12 9 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 4:00 PM 1 2 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 5:00 PM 1 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6:00 PM 1 4 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 7:00 PM 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8:00 PM 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 9:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:00 PM 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Total 20 36 84 51 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 201 Percent 10.0% 17.9% 41.8% 25.4% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.00% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 17.8 mph Mean (Average) Speed 17.4 mph 85th Percentile 22.6 mph 10 mph Pace 13.1 - 23.1 mph 95th Percentile 25.0 mph Percent in Pace 71.1 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Tuesday, June 12, 2018 Westbound &40; DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph)Total Time 0.10 10 -15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6:00 AM 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 7:00 AM 0 4 10 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 8:00 AM 1 12 46 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 9:00 AM 1 3 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 10:00 AM 0 1 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 11:00 AM 0 3 29 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 12:00 PM 3 9 17 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 1:00 PM 0 4 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 2:00 PM 0 5 16 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 3:00 PM 1 22 48 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 75 4:00 PM 0 2 11 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 5:00 PM 3 4 34 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 6:00 PM 1 16 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 7:00 PM 0 0 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 8:00 PM 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 9:00 PM 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 10:00 PM 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 10 86 266 131 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 509 Percent 2.0% 16.9% 52.3% 25.7% 3.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.6 mph Mean (Average) Speed 18.1 mph 85th Percentile 21.9 mph 10 mph Pace 13.4 - 23.4 mph 95th Percentile 24.3 mph Percent in Pace 80.75 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Eastbound a DATA SOLUTIONS _ Speed Range (mph) Total Tlme 0.10 10 -15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 _ 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 AM 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 AM 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 8:00 AM 1 9 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 9:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 10:00 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 AM 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 12:00 PM 0 2 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1:00 PM 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2:00 PM 1 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 3:00 PM 1 10 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 4:00 PM 0 2 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 5:00 PM 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6:00 PM 0 0 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 7:00 PM 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 3 31 61 55 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 Percent 1.9% 20.0% 39.4% 35.5% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.4 mph Mean (Average) Speed 18.4 mph 85th Percentile 22.2 mph 10 mph Pace 12.9 - 22.9 mph 95th Percentile 24.2 mph Percent in Pace 81.9 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Westbound ecoll . DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range mph Total Time 0-10 10 -15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 AM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7:00 AM 0 3 17 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 8:00 AM 1 16 34 24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 9:00 AM 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10:00 AM 1 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 If 11:00 AM 1 4 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 12:00 PM 0 1 16 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 1:00 PM 0 6 10 3 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 2:00 PM 0 6 16 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 3:00 PM 1 13 31 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 4:00 PM 0 2 6 19 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 5:00 PM 0 0 5 30 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 6:00 PM 0 2 9 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 7:00 PM 1 0 8 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 8:00 PM 0 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9:00 PM 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10:00 PM 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 5 56 180 175 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 442 Percent 1.1% 12.7% 40.7%. 39.6% 5.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 19.7 mph Mean (Average) Speed 19.3 mph 85th Percentile 22.8 mph 10 mph Pace 14.5 - 24.5 mph 95th Percentile 25.5 mph Percent in Pace 81.9 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Thursday, June 14, 2018 Eastbound wa), DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph)_ Total Time 0 -10 10 -15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50.55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 AM 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7:00 AM 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 AM 4 7 23 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 9:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10:00 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:00 AM 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12:00 PM 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1:00 PM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2:00 PM 1 7 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 3:00 PM 1 19 15 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 4:00 PM 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5:00 PM 0 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6:00 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7:00 PM 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 PM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 9:00 PM 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10:00PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11:00PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 8 46 71 47 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 Percent 4.5% 25.8% 39.9% 26.4% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0°I 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 17.4 mph Mean (Average) Speed 17.5 mph 85th Percentile 22.1 mph 10 mph Pace 12.0 - 22.0 mph 95th Percentile 24.8 mph Percent in Pace 73.6 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Thursday, June 14, 2018 Westbound i&&)' DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range mph Total Time 0-10 10-15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7:00 AM 1 0 10 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 8:00 AM 3 16 34 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 9:00 AM 0 6 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 10:00 AM 0 1 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 11:00 AM 1 9 17 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 12:00 PM 0 8 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1:00 PM 1 4 9 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 2:00 PM 0 6 11 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 3:00 PM 0 15 33 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 4:00 PM 0 1 15 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 5:00 PM 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6:00 PM 0 0 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7:00 PM 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8:00 PM 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9:00 PM 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10:00 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 6 73 181 114 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 390 Percent 1.5% 18.7% 46.4% 29.2% 3.8% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Daily Percentile Speed Summary Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.4 mph Mean (Average) Speed 18.3 mph 85th Percentile 22.1 mph 10 mph Pace 12.8 - 22.8 mph 95th Percentile 24.4 mph Percent in Pace 82.56 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Total Study Average Eastbound i"f &fQw7k DATA SOLUTIONS _ Speed Range (mph) Total Time 0-10 10 -15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 AM 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 AM 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 AM 2 7 22 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 9:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:00 AM 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:00 AM 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12:00 PM 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 1:00 PM 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2:00 PM 2 5 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 3:00 PM 5 13 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 4:00 PM 0 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 5:00 PM 0 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6:00 PM 0 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 7:00 PM 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 8:00 PM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 9:00 PM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11:00PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 10 37 71 50 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 Percent 5.8% 21.6% 41.5% 29.2% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Note: Average only condsidered on days with 24-hours of data. Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.0 mph Mean (Average) Speed 17.7 mph 85th Percentile 22.3 mph 10 mph Pace 12.3 - 22.3 mph 95th Percentile 24.7 mph Percent in Pace 74.2 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com Location: S 300TH ST BTWN WILDWOOD ES DWYS Date Range: 6/12/2018 to 6/14/2018 Site Code: 08 Total Study Average Westbound DATA SOLUTIONS Speed Range (mph) Total Time 0-10 10-15 15 - 20 20 - 25 25 - 30 30 - 35 35 - 40 40 - 45 45 - 50 50 - 55 55 - 60 60 - 65 65 - 70 70 - 75 75 - 80 80 - 85 85 + Volume 12:00 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5:00 AM 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6:00 AM 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7:00 AM 0 2 12 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 8:00 AM 2 15 38 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 9:00 AM 0 3 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 10:00 AM 0 1 9 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 11:00 AM 1 5 19 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 12:00 PM 1 6 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1:00 PM 0 5 10 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 2:00 PM 0 6 14 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 3:00 PM 1 17 37 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 4:00 PM 0 2 11 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 5:00 PM 1 2 14 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 6:00 PM 0 6 6 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 7:00 PM 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8:00 PM 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9:00 PM 0 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10:00 PM 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 6 72 207 141 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 445 Percent 1.3% 16.2% 46.5% 31.7% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Note: Average only condsidered on days with 24-hours of data. Total Study Percentile Speed Summary Total Study Speed Statistics 50th Percentile (Median) 18.7 mph Mean (Average) Speed 18.6 mph 85th Percentile 22.3 mph 10 mph Pace 13.4 - 23.4 mph 95th Percentile 24.5 mph Percent in Pace 80.8 % Mark Skaggs:425-250-0777 mark.skaggs@idaxdata.com ATTACHMENT B Intersection LOS Summary Sheets -� TENW HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersecton Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT FOR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41- 44. 4-11 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 27 1 54 14 13 3 8 98 27 17 0 Future Vol, vehlh 1 27 1 54 14 13 3 8 98 27 17 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 036 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 1 1 1 7 7 7 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1 36 1 71 18 17 4 11 129 36 22 6 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SIB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB W8 Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB E8 Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.8 8.1 7.6 7.9 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 3% 3% 67% 61 % Vol Thru, % 7% 93% 17% 39% Vol Right, % 90% 3% 16% 0%n Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 109 29 81 44 LT Vol 3 1 54 27 Through Vol 8 27 14 17 RT Vol 98 1 13 0 Lane Flow Rate 143 38 107 58 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.155 0.048 0.131 0.072 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.887 4.554 4.437 4.5 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 926 789 813 799 Service Time 1.896 2.566 2.437 2.512 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.154 0.048 0.132 0.073 HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.8 8.1 7.9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: West Drivewa /24th PI S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 r: Int Delay, s/veh 5.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SSR Lane Configurations 4 414 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 19 126 29 31 2 Future Vol, veh/h 5 19 126 29 31 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 18 0 30 12 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - Veh in Median Stora e If - 0 - • 0 - 4+ 54 22 27 3 30 2 54 22 27 3 30 2 30 0 12 o 0 18 Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop - - None - - None 9 Grade, % - 3 - - -10 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 2 2 2 0 0 0 9 9 9 Mvmt Flow 7 26 173 40 42 3 74 30 37 4 41 3 Major/Minor Majorl _ Major2 Millm _ Minol Conflicting Flow All 63 0 0 229 0 0 333 300 155 314 385 92 Stage - - - - - - 157 157 - 142 142 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 176 143 - 172 243 - Critical Hdwy 4.15 - - 4.12 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.19 6.59 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 - Critical Hdwy Slg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - - 2.218 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.581 4.081 3.381 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1521 - - 1339 - 624 616 896 625 538 946 Stage 1 - - - - 850 772 - 844 766 - Stage 2 - - - - - 831 782 - 814 692 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1498 - 1306 - - 539 570 865 544 498 909 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 539 570 - 544 498 - Stage 1 - - - - 825 749 - 827 731 - Stage 2 - - - 739 746 - 737 671 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 3.7 12.7 12.7 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane[Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 606 1498 - - 1306 - - 515 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.233 0.005 - - 0.03 - - 0.093 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 7.4 0 - 7.8 0 - 12.7 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Driveway/26th Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4� 414 4� 44 Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 40 0 0 37 2 22 9 15 3 1 6 Future Vol, vehlh 4 40 0 0 37 2 22 9 15 3 1 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 0 14 22 0 11 14 0 22 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channel€zed - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - -10 - - 10 - -3 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 47 0 0 44 2 26 11 18 4 1 7 Major)Minar Majorl Major2 Minors Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 57 0 0 69 0 0 142 136 91 150 135 70 Stage 1 - - - - 79 79 - 56 56 - Stage 2 - - - - - 63 57 - 94 79 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 6.7 6.1 6.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.7 5.1 - 6.1 5.5 - Criticai Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.7 5.1 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 - 3.68 4.18 3.48 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1560 - - 1545 - - 807 739 926 822 760 998 Stage 1 - - - - - - 899 806 - 961 852 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 914 821 - 918 833 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - 1517 - - 775 717 892 774 737 977 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 775 717 - 774 737 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 880 789 - 949 844 - Stage 2 - - - - - 896 814 - 869 816 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.7 0 9.9 9.2 HCM LOS A A Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 E13L EBT EBR VVBL WJBT WBR 5BLnl Capacity (veh/h) 796 1546 - 1517 - - 879 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.068 0.003 - - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.9 7.3 0 0 - 9.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - 0 - 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.7 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 15 4 43 9 11 5 17 44 14 17 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 15 4 43 9 11 5 17 44 14 17 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 16 16 16 13 13 13 5 5 5 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 23 6 65 14 17 8 26 67 21 26 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach l EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach VVB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.6 8.1 7.4 7.6 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 8% 0% 68% 45% Vol Thru, % 26% 79% 14% 55% Vol Right, % 67% 21 % 17% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 66 19 63 31 LT Vol 5 0 43 14 Through Vol 17 15 9 17 RT Vol 44 4 11 0 Lane Flow Rate 100 29 95 47 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.107 0.035 0.117 0.056 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.853 4.376 4.431 4.285 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 914 806 801 822 Service Time 1.945 2.468 2.501 2.382 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.109 0.036 0.119 0.057 HCM Control Delay 7.4 7.6 8.1 7.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06119/2018 2018 Existing PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: West Drivewa /24th PI S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 5.8 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WB�T NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4� 4� �4 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 21 38 18 29 12 20 11 13 8 11 7 Future Vol, veh/h 10 21 38 18 29 12 20 11 13 8 11 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 72 0 74 11 0 9 74 0 11 9 0 72 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 3 - - -10 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 9 9 15 15 15 0 0 0 12 12 12 Mvmt Flow 19 40 73 35 56 23 38 21 25 15 21 13 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl M_ inor2 Conflicting Flow All 151 0 0 187 0 0 418 410 162 359 435 214 Stage 1 - - - - - - 189 189 - 210 210 - Stage 2 - - - - - 229 221 - 149 225 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 - 4.25 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.22 6.62 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.22 5.62 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.22 5.62 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 - 2.335 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.608 4.108 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1388 - 1313 - - 549 534 888 578 500 801 Stage 1 - - - - 817 748 - 770 710 - Stage 2 - - - - 778 724 - 830 699 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1305 - 1232 - - "0 450 826 486 421 707 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 440 450 - 486 421 - Stage 1 - - - - - 754 690 - 712 648 Stage 2 - - - 672 660 - 761 645 Approach E8 WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 2.4 13A 13.1 HCM LOS B B Minor LanelMaior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 514 1305 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.165 0.015 HCM Control Delay_ (s) 13.4 7.8 HCM Lane LOS B A HCM 95th We Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 1232 - 495 - - 0.028 - - 0.101 0 - 8 0 - 13.1 A - A A - B - - 0.1 - - 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Driveway/26th Ave S $ S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement ESL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL 581_ Lane Configurations 44� 44 Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 39 0 0 30 9 20 1 11 7 0 12 Future Vol, vehih 12 39 0 0 30 9 20 1 11 7 0 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 13 0 17 61 0 57 17 0 61 57 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channellzed - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - -10 - - 10 - - -3 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 3 3 34 34 34 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 25 81 0 0 63 19 42 2 23 15 0 25 MajorlMinor Ma arl Malor2 Minorl _ _ Minor2 Confiicling Flow All 139 0 0 142 0 0 294 331 203 335 322 147 Stage 1 - - - - - - 192 192 - 130 130 - Stage 2 - - - - - 102 139 - 205 192 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.13 - - 6.84 6.24 6.24 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 5.84 5.24 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 5.84 5.24 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.227 - - 3.806 4.306 3.606 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1457 - 1435 - - 629 570 776 622 599 905 Stage 1 - - - - - 765 708 - 878 792 - Stage 2 - - - - - 846 741 - 802 745 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1388 - 1362 - - 563 506 699 534 531 850 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 563 506 - 534 531 - Stage 1 - - - - - 712 659 - 820 755 - Stage 2 - - - - - 809 706 - 720 694 - EB WB NB SS HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 11.7 10.5 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt N13Ln1 EBL EST EBR WBL WET WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 601 1388 - - 1362 - - 698 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.111 0.018 - - - - - 0.057 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.7 7.6 0 - 0 - - 10.5 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0 - 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2018 Existing PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4�- 4 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 29 1 57 15 14 3 8 104 29 18 0 Future Vol, veh/h 1 29 1 57 15 14 3 8 104 29 18 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 7 7 1 1 1 7 7 7 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 1 38 1 75 20 18 4 11 137 38 24 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 pproa0 EB WB _ NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB N13 Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.9 8.2 7.7 7.9 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 W8Ln1 SBi_n1 Vol Left, % 3% 3%u 66% 62% Vol Thru, % 7% 94% 17% 38% Vol Right, % 90% 3%u 16% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 115 31 86 47 LT Vol 3 1 57 29 Through Vol 8 29 15 18 RT Vol 104 1 14 0 Lane Flow Rate 151 41 113 62 GeometryGrp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.165 0.052 0.14 0.078 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.914 4.591 4.455 4.535 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 920 782 807 792 Service Time 1.923 2.607 2.469 2.548 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 0.052 0.14 0.078 HCM Control Delay 7.7 7.9 8.2 7.9 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th4ile Q 0.6 0.2 0.5 o.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/02/2018 2020 Baseline AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: West Drivewayl24th PI S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 5.9 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NSL NBT NBR SBL SST SBR Lane Configurations +4 Traffic Vol, vehlh 5 20 134 31 33 2 57 23 29 3 32 2 Future Vol, veh/h 5 20 134 31 33 2 57 23 29 3 32 2 Conflicting Peds, Xhr 18 0 30 12 0 0 30 0 12 0 0 18 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 3 - - -10 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 2 2 2 0 0 0 9 9 9 Mvmt Flow 7 27 184 42 45 3 78 32 40 4 44 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minors Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 66 0 0 241 0 0 347 313 161 330 404 95 Stage 1 - - - - - 163 163 - 149 149 - Stage 2 - - - - 184 150 . 181 255 - Critical Hdwy 4.15 - 4.12 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.19 6.59 6.29 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.59 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.245 - 2.218 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.581 4.081 3.381 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1517 - 1326 - - 611 606 889 610 525 943 Stage 1 - - - - - 844 767 - 837 761 - Stage 2 - - - - - 822 777 - 805 684 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1494 - 1293 - - 524 560 858 528 485 906 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - 524 560 - 528 485 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 819 744 - 820 724 - Stage 2 - - - - - 726 740 - 724 663 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 3.7 13.1 13 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 594 1494 - - 1293 - - 501 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.251 0.005 - 0.033 - - 0.101 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.1 7.4 0 - 7.9 0 - 13 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0 - - 0.1 - 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/02/2018 2020 Baseline AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Driveway/26th Ave S & S 300th St - 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 4.1 EBL EBT EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4� 44- 4:4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 42 0 0 39 2 23 10 16 3 1 6 Future Vol, veh/h 4 42 0 0 39 2 23 10 16 3 1 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 0 14 22 0 11 14 0 22 11 0 3 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % - -10 - - 10 - -3- Peak Hour Factor 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 20 20 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 49 0 0 46 2 27 12 19 4 1 7 Major/Minor Ma orl Ma'or2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 59 0 0 71 0 0 146 140 93 155 139 72 Stage 1 - - - - - - 81 81 - 58 58 - Stage 2 - - - - - 65 59 - 97 81 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 6.7 6.1 6.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.7 5.1 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.7 5.1 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.68 4.18 3.48 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1558 - 1542 - - 803 736 924 816 756 996 Stage 1 - - - - - - 897 805 - 959 851 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 912 820 - 914 832 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1544 - - 1514 - - 771 714 890 765 733 975 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 771 714 - 765 733 - Stagel - - - - - - 878 788 - 947 843 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 894 813 - 863 815 - Approach EB WB NB ss HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0 9.9 9.2 HCM LOS A A Minor L"Re-ior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT W8R SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 793 1544 - - 1514 - - 874 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 0,003 - - - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.9 7.3 0 - 0 - - 9.2 HCM Lane_ LOS A A A - A - - A HCM 95th %, file Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/02/2018 2020 Baseline AM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.8 Intersection LOS A Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 41� Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 16 4 46 10 12 5 18 47 15 18 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 16 4 46 10 12 5 18 47 15 18 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 16 16 16 13 13 13 5 5 5 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 24 6 70 15 18 8 27 71 23 27 0 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB w Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.7 8.2 7.5 7.7 HCM LOS A A A A Lane NSLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 7% 0% 68% 45% Vol Thru, % 26% 80% 15% 55% Vol Right, % 67% 20% 18% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 70 20 68 33 LT Vol 5 0 46 15 Through Vol 18 16 10 18 RT Vol 47 4 12 0 Lane Flow Rate 106 30 103 50 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.117 0.038 0.127 0.061 Departure Headway (Hd) 3.968 4.505 4.443 4.413 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 908 798 796 816 Service Time 1.971 2.513 2.53 2.418 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.117 0.038 0.129 0.061 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.7 8.2 7.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2020 Baseline PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 TWSC 2: West Driveway/24th PI S & S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.9 Movement ESL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NST NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 } 43 4 } 44 Traffic Vol, vehlh 11 22 40 19 31 13 21 12 14 8 12 7 Future Vol, vehlh 11 22 40 19 31 13 21 12 14 8 12 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 72 0 74 11 0 9 74 0 11 9 0 72 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 3 - - -10 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 9 9 15 15 15 0 0 0 12 12 12 Mvmt Flow 21 42 77 37 60 25 40 23 27 15 23 13 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 157 0 0 193 0 0 436 428 166 378 454 219 Stage 1 - - - - - - 197 197 - 219 219 - Stage 2 - - - - 239 231 - 159 235 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 - - 4.25 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.22 6.62 6.32 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.22 5.62 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.22 5.62 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 2.335 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.608 4.108 3.408 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1381 - - 1306 - 534 522 884 562 487 796 Stage 1 - - - - - 809 742 - 761 704 - Stage 2 - - - - - 769 717 - 820 692 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - 1225 - 425 438 822 468 409 702 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 425 438 - 468 409 - Stage 1 - - - - 746 684 - 703 641 - Stage 2 - - - 660 652 - 746 638 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 2.4 13.8 13.4 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBt-n1 Capacity (veh/h) 501 1298 - - 1225 - - 479 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.18 0.016 - - 0.03 - - 0.108 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.8 7.8 0 - 8 0 - 13.4 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.1 - 0.1 - - 0.4 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2020 Baseline PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 TWSC 3: East Driveway/26th Ave S $ S 300th St 10/23/2018 Intersection Int Delay, slveh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 44 4 <, Traffic Val, veh/h 13 41 0 0 32 10 21 1 12 7 0 13 Future Vol, veh/h 13 41 0 0 32 10 21 1 12 7 0 13 Conflicting Peds, 41hr 13 0 17 61 0 57 17 0 61 57 0 13 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - -10 - - 10 - -3 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 4B 48 48 48 48 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 0 3 3 3 34 34 34 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 27 85 0 0 67 21 44 2 25 15 0 27 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minors Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 145 0 0 146 0 0 308 345 207 -349 335 152 Stage 1 - - - - - - 200 200 - 135 135 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 108 145 - 214 200 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.13 - - 6.84 6.24 6.24 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 5.84 5.24 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5.84 5.24 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.227 - - 3.806 4.306 3.606 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1450 - - 1430 - - 617 561 772 609 589 900 Stage 1 - - - - - 759 703 - 873 789 - Stage 2 - - - - - 840 737 - 793 739 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1381 - 1357 - 550 496 696 521 521 845 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 550 496 - 521 521 - Stage 1 - - - - 705 653 - 814 752 - Stage 2 - - - - 802 702 - 708 687 - Approach _ _ EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 11.9 10.5 _ HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Maior Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnl Capacity (veh/h) 592 1381 - - 1357 - - 694 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.12 0.02 - - - - 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.9 7.7 0 - 0 - - 10.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A - A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0A 0A - - 0 - 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 06/19/2018 2020 Baseline PM LOS Synchro 10 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 8.2 Intersection LOS A Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU W6L WBT WBR NBU NBL IVBT NBR Vol,vehm 0 1 34 1 0 75 19 18 0 3 8 125 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.92 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.92 0.76 0.76 0.76 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 7 7 7 2 1 1 1 2 7 7 7 Mvmt Flow 0 1 45 1 0 99 25 24 0 4 11 164 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach _ EB _ _ WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SIB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 8.1 8.6 8 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLrt1 Vol Left, % 2% 3% 67% 65% Vol Thru, % 6% 94% 17% 35% Vol Right, % 92% 3% 16% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 136 36 112 52 LT Vol 3 1 75 34 Through Vol 8 34 19 18 RT Vol 125 1 18 0 Lane Flow Rate 179 47 147 68 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.2 0.062 0.186 0.089 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.016 4.718 4.546 4.678 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 895 760 790 767 Service Time 2.033 2.744 2.569 2.7 HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.2 0.062 0.186 0.089 HCM Control Delay 8 8.1 8.6 8.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 0.2 0.7 0.3 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10I2/2018 2020 Project AM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes SBU SBL SBT SBR 0 34 18 0 0.92 0.76 0.76 0.76 2 0 0 0 0 45 24 0 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 8.2 HCM LOS A Lane 11/16/2018 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/212018 2020 Project AM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 Roundabout 2: West Driveway/24th PI S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 5.6 Intersection LOS A Approach ES WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 260 99 190 58 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 273 101 190 63 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 106 155 47 208 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 165 82 332 48 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 30 12 30 18 Ped Cap Adj 0.996 0.998 0.996 0.998 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.5 4.8 5.0 4.9 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 273 101 190 63 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1016 968 1078 918 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.953 0.980 1.000 0.927 Flow Entry, veh/h 260 99 190 58 Cap Entry, veh/h 965 947 1074 848 V/C Ratio 0.270 0.105 0.177 0.069 Control Delay, s/veh 6.5 4.8 5.0 4.9 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 0 1 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/2/2018 2020 Project AM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 3 HCM 2010 Roundabout 3: East Drivewayl26th Ave S $ S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh Intersection LOS 4.2 A Approach Ea WS NB SS Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 64 64 76 16 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 64 64 92 16 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 22 62 62 102 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 96 92 24 24 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 14 22 22 11 Ped Cap Adj 0.998 0.997 0.997 0.998 Approach Delay, slveh 3.8 3.9 4.9 3.7 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Lett Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 64 64 92 16 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1105 1062 1062 1020 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 1.000 0.828 1.000 Flow Entry, veh/h 64 64 76 16 Cap Entry, veh/h 1103 1059 877 1019 V/C Ratio 0.058 0.060 0.087 0.016 Control Delay, slveh 3.8 3.9 4.9 3.7 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 0 0 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 10/2/2018 2020 Project AM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 4 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 lntersect on Intersection Delay, s/veh 8 Intersection LOS A Movement S U E81- EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR Vol, veh1h 0 0 18 4 0 57 12 14 0 5 18 56 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.92 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.92 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 16 16 16 2 13 13 13 2 5 5 5 Mvmt Flow 0 0 27 6 0 86 18 21 0 8 27 85 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB Opposing Approach WB EB SB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.8 8.4 7.6 HCM LOS A A A Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 6% 0% 69% 49% Vol Thru, % 23% 82% 14% 51 % Vol Right, % 71% 18% 17% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 79 22 83 35 LT Vol 5 0 57 17 Through Vol 18 18 12 18 RT Vol 56 4 14 0 Lane Flow Rate 120 33 126 53 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.133 0.042 0.157 0.066 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.014 4.581 4.581 4.501 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 898 784 787 800 Service Time 2.018 2.593 2.581 2.506 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.134 0.042 0.16 0.066 HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.8 8.4 7.8 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.2 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 6/19/2018 2020 Project PM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 1 HCM 2010 AWSC 1: 23rd Ave S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SOT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 17 18 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 26 27 0 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 A proach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 1 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 HCM Control Delay 7.8 HCM LOS A Lane Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 6/19/2018 2020 Project PM LOS Synchro 8 Report TENW Page 2 HCM 2010 Roundabout 2: West Drivewa /24th PI S & S 300th St Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 5.3 Intersection LOS A Fnfnilnns� — - -.I—....vv Conflicting Circle Lanes Adj Approach Flow, veh/h Demand Flow Rate, veh/h Vehicles Circulating, veh/h Vehicles Exiting, veh/h Follow -Up Headway, s Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h Ped Cap Adj Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS Lane Designated Moves Assumed Moves RT Channelized Lane Util Critical Headway, s Entry Flow, veh/h Cap Entry Lane, veh/h Entry HV Adj Factor Flow Entry, veh/h Cap Entry, veh/h V/C Ratio Control Delay, s/veh LOS 95th %tile Queue, veh d .1 Main— . 11 IV/AV 10 ES 1 W8 NB L� SB 169 128 1 123 1 184 148 123 55 91 117 92 92 62 157 98 183 186 3.186 3.1863.186 3.18 79 74 11 3.186 0.990 0.998 74 0.990 72 5.6 5.6 4.6 0.990 A A 5.0 Lett Left Left A LTR LTR TR Left LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR 1.000 1.000 1. 000 5.193 5.193 5.119393 1.000 184 148 123 5.193 1032 1005 1031 62 0.917 0.866 1 938 169 128 .123 0 884 936 870 1020 55 0.180 0.147 0.121 821 5.6 5 6 4.6 0.067 A A 5.0 1 1 0 A 0 Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 6/19/2018 2020 Project PM LOS TENW Synchro 8 Report Page 3 HCM 2010 Roundabout S & S 300th St 11/16/2018 3: East Drivewa 126th Ave Intersection Intersection Delay, slveh 4.8 Intersection LOS A NB Sg A roast+ E$ WB 1 1 1 Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 44 Conflicting Circle Lanes 100 89 Adj Approach Flow, vehm 121 103 119 44Demand Flow Rate, vehm 121 99 132 148 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh 27 152 16 54 Vehicles Exiting, vehlh 165 3.186 3.186 3.186 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 61 61 57 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #1h 17 0.992 0.992 0.992 Ped Cap Adj 0.998 4.6 6.2 4.1 Approach Delay, slveh 4.2 A A A Approach LOS A Left Left Lane Left Lett LTR LTR LTR Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR RT Channelized 1.000 1.000 1.000 Lane Util 1.000 5.193 5.193 5.193 Critical Headway, s 5.193 103 119 44 Entry Flow, vehlh 121 110100 023 990 974 Cap Entry Lane, vehlh 1 0 0.746 1.000 Entry HV Adj Factor 1.000 100 89 44 Flow Entry, vehlh 121 985 732 967 Cap Entry, vehlh 1097 0.101 0.121 0.046 VIC Ratio 0.110 4 6 6.2 4.1 Control Delay, slveh 4.2 A A A LOS A 0 0 0 95th %tile Queue, veh 0 Synchro 8 Report Federal Way SD - Wildwood Elementary School 5:00 pm 6/19/2018 2020 Project PM LOS Page 4 TENW ATTACHMENT C Future Traffic Volume Estimates TENW 2020 AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Federal Way School District W ildwood Elementary School - 2405 S 300th St, Federal Way, WA an 2018 Existing N � N 7 1 13 81 27 283 14 29 1 54 152 m m m rn n o S 300tls SV2.4th PI Sfyygat Orivgwa m N C1 N M Cr) 87 5 2 62 19 350 31 150 126 29 49 0 N N m m m o 1 9 booth SMM Avo SfEaat Orlveway o m � m 4 2 40 139 37 N N 2020 Baseline 1 1 ' 8 300th SV23rd Avg S n CO a m` N 18 1 14 86 29 279 15 31 1 57 161 Cr) m m fO r r % Increase = 6.1 % 39 65 58 44 S 300th StI24th PI SfWost Oriv m m N m 92 5 2 66 20 371 33 159 134 31 52 O, M N N m C % Increase = 6.1% i S 300th S726th Ave SlEast Orivoway m m m 69 4 2 41 42 147 39 47 0 0 62 N O m N Increase = 6.1 % Trip Distribution S 300lh SU23rd Ave S $ 300th SVR4t11 PI SryMeEI Otfvowa 0 0 e 0 60% 15% 10% 150% 10% 60% 50% 5% 15% e ^ o O O m m o to m m S 3M Str th Avg SrEaat Orlvoway e c m m e m 15% 25 % 5% 80% 5% 15% 10% 20% 25% u e o O � O N e m m m AM Peak Generator Enter Exit 53 45 Project Trips S 300th SV23rd AY m Ln N 5 5 27 5 59 5 5 1g 32 N m N 0 m N m 7 7 5 74 5 2 27 3 8 m N N j N 9 3oM St/28th Avg SlEsst DdVoway CO N m 7 13 2 39 3 8 5 11 11 N N re T IIp 2 3 2020 With Project S 3091h S023rd Avo S N m y� N CO 23113 361075193 �i Protect share = 17.4% S 30M SH24th PI SMQ%t t7rivewa N m ,y m m 119 5 2 73 25 445 37 191 160 33 60 m N N m N N � Preiacl Share = 16.5% 9 3o8lh SWIM Ave SIEsst 06vaway m m a M 76 4 2 55 45 187 42 54 5 11 73 m N N OLn N Praivcl share = 21.0% Date Printed: 10/212018 Page 1 of 1 TENW 2020 PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Federal Way School District Wildwood Elementary School - 2405 S 300th St, Federal Way, WA 2018 Existing 1 2.30 to 3; 30 pM 3 300tb 5V23 re AVa S m m N 14 11 63 15 179 9 19 4 43 73 m Z30 to 3:30 PM N m r. m 56 10 12 59 21 198 29 69 38 18 42 O N � io 2;30 to 3;3D PM 3 300th St/28th Ave S/East flrivaway N N 12 9 39 141 30 62 Growth Rate 3.0% Existing Year 2018 Baseline Year 2020 1 2020 Baseline Trip Distribution 3 300th SV23rd A. S Cr) o C1 m O m Lo 15 0 12 67 16 190 10 20 4 46 77 m m n v m o n % Increase = 6.1 % S 300th Co m N m 59 11 13 63 22 210 31 73 40 19 45 N � � n v Increase = 6.1 % 3 300M St/286t Ave S/East D rivoway O C) N N 0—— %increase=66 41 5460 6.1 % 1 5 30M SU23rd Aga 5 0 0 O O 2 3304ih SV24th pl Slyl's al prfraw o a 0 0 e 0 60% 15% 10% 150% 10% 60% 50% 5% 15% p p o m � 0 m m m m 0 10% 10% 60% 10% 120% 10% 10% 40% 60% 0 0 V 0 0 � o V 3 300th SV2tith Ave S/East Driveway o Lo 0 m 15% 25% 5% 80% So/ 15% 10% 20% 25% e � m o N o e v) m 1 PM Peak Generator Enter Exit 23 28 PM Peak Adjacent Street Traffic Enter Exit 12 14 Project Trips a 30" SU23rd Ave S N M 317 201, 14 rn GENERATOR N m N 17 4 2 38 3 14 12 1 4 m m PEAK GENERATOR 3 300th St/28th Ave SlEast Orivswey 4 6 0-- 47 m O 2 2020 With Project Lo M Cq Cn o m n 18 0 14 84 18 221 12 22 4 57 91 in m m m � m r. Sham= 13.9% o m m Cr) r` m 76 11 13 67 25 248 34 67 52 20 46 m N m Co 1 rafDci Share = 15.4% 3 300M St/28th Ave SIEaat Driveway N u° N 47 2 5 67 to Proieci Share = 12.0% 70 58 TENW Date Printed: 10/2/2018 Page 1 of 1 RECFIVED P S cmi September 21, 2018 00MMUldiT'{ Ray Vefik Federal Way Public Schools Capital Projects (206) 919-0372 rvefik@fwps.org 1211 S 232"d St Federal Way, WA 98004 RE: Wildwood Elementary School — Subsurface Soil UST Investigation 2405 S 300t' Street, Federal Way, Washington PBS Project #41519.003 PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. (PBS) performed a subsurface soil investigation at the request of Federal Way Public Schools (FWPS). The investigation was completed at Wildwood Elementary School (WES) located at 2405 S 300th Street, Federal Way, Washington (Figure 1). The school facility is currently occupied. PBS understands that FWPS plans to demolish the current facilities at WES in preparation for construction of a new school at the site. The subsurface soil investigation was performed in the vicinity of one underground heating oil storage tank (UST) located to the south of the boiler room. The intent was to evaluate if a potential release from the UST has impacted the surrounding soil. The scope of services was presented in the Subsurface Investigation proposal (WA28805) by PBS, dated August 3, 2018. SUBSURFACE SOILS INVESTIGATION On August 23, 2018 PBS met with Applied Professional Services (APS) of North Bend, Washington to conduct private utility locating and conduct a ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey in the area south of the boiler room. GPR is a geophysical method that uses radar pulses to reflect images of the subsurface. A manhole and two tank monitors associated with the UST were observed during the site visit. The area is bound to the north and west by the building, to the south by a parking lot and a portable class room, and to the east by a drive aisle. Access to this area is provided by gated vehicle width driveway. The underground utility survey of the project area indicated numerous potential steam pipes, water lines and sewer pipes, natural gas lines, and buried electrical. Four boring locations were proposed to the north, south, east and west of the UST (Figure 2). The UST is estimated to be approximately 8 feet in diameter and 21 feet long. Based on the 2.5-foot depth to the top of the tank determined by the GPR survey, the base of the UST is estimated to be approximately 9.5 feet bgs. On August 29, 2018, PBS Environmental conducted a subsurface investigation at the subject property to investigate the soil in proximity to the UST. Holocene Drilling of Puyallup, Washington advanced a total of four soil borings (WW-01 to WW-04) using a track mounted direct -push drill rig. Due to the proximity of boring WW- 04 to the natural gas line servicing the building, Holocene mobilized a vacuum truck with air knife technology. The boring was advanced to a depth of 5 feet bgs with nondestructive digging methods to avoid disturbance of the natural gas line. Sampling of all borings was completed by driving a 2.25-inch diameter steel solid -barrel 5-foot sampler lined with a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) sleeve. Two discrete soil samples were collected from each boring at depths corresponding to field indications of contamination and to one to two feet below the estimated base 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 . 206.233.9639 MAIN • 866.727.0140 FAX - PBSUSA.COM Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Subsurface Investigation Report September 21, 2018 Page 2 elevation of the UST (9.5 feet). A third soil sample was collected from soil boring WW-02 to characterize contaminant distribution to the full depth of the boring due to field observations of contamination in the boring. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the four onsite borings advanced to a maximum depth of 17 feet bgs. All samples were collected in laboratory -supplied containers, placed in a cooler with ice and transported to Fremont Analytical Laboratory in Seattle, Washington, under chain -of -custody documentation. Samples were analyzed for the following: Diesel range total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) by Method NWTPH-Dx (method includes reporting TPH in the heavy oil range); ■ Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTE)) by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260C. • Additionally, one soil sample was selected for analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by US EPA method 8270-SIM. PBS personnel wore new disposable nitrile gloves when collecting samples. Upon completion of sampling, temporary boreholes were backfilled and sealed with bentonite to six inches below grade and capped with either asphalt or soil to match the surrounding surface. FINDINGS Soil Field Observations The soils encountered in the borings consisted of medium dense to hard, brown, well graded gravelly sand. Drilling refusal was encountered at depths ranging from 13 to 17 feet bgs in the four borings. Evidence of staining and fuel odors were observed in boring WW-02, indicating a petroleum release on the south side of the UST. Maximum photoionization detector (PID) readings of organic vapors were observed at a depth of 7 feet bgs in boring WW-02. PID readings dissipated to insignificant concentrations by a depth of 14 feet bgs. A sample was collected at 17 feet bgs, the total depth of the boring, to characterize the vertical extent of contamination. Detailed boring logs are included in Attachment A of this report. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings. Sample Results PBS submitted a total of seven soil samples for laboratory analysis. Copies of the laboratory reports and sample chain -of -custody forms are presented in Attachment B. Sampling results and applicable cleanup levels are summarized in Table 1. Results of soil analyses performed are summarized below. e TPH as diesel was detected above Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A Cleanup Levels (CULs) in the 11.5-foot sample from boring WW-02 located to the south of the UST. No other constituents were detected above MTCA Method A CULs in any other soil samples collected from the site. • BTEX constituents were not detected above laboratory reporting limits in any of the soil samples collected from the site. • PAHs were detected above laboratory reporting limits but below MTCA CULs in the sample selected for PAH analysis. No carcinogenic PAHs were detected above laboratory reporting limits. Calculation of benzo[a]pyrene toxicity equivalence for carcinogenic PAHs based on reporting limits of non -detect results is presented in Attachment C. • No constituents were detected above laboratory reporting limits in borings WW-01, WW-03 or WW-04 to 41519.003 Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Subsurface Investigation Report September 21, 2018 Page 3 the north, east and west of the UST. No constituents were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the 17-foot sample collected from boring WW-02. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of this investigation, petroleum impacted soil was identified to the south of the former UST, indicating a release from the UST. Results suggest that the release is limited to the south end of the UST and does not extend beyond a depth of 17 feet bgs in the area investigated. However, given the sandy nature of soils encountered at the subject property it is possible that if the release occurred at the base of the tank it could migrate vertically down instead of laterally. PBS recommends removal of the UST during the demolition phase of proposed site construction. A tank closure assessment should be performed when/if the UST is decommissioned or removed from the subject property to further define the extent of contamination and ensure proper remediation of the impacted area. LIMITATIONS PBS has prepared this report for use by FWPS. This report is not intended for use by others without the written consent of the FWPS. Our interpretation of soil conditions in this study was based on field observations and analytical data from the indicated explorations. Regulated substances may exist in portions of the site that were not explored or analyzed. The conclusions in this report are not to be considered a legal opinion as the client's duty concerning due diligence relating to potential liabilities in leasing, owning, or purchasing real estate. PBS ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INC. ok Wash Digitally signed by James pj Welles Date: 2018.09.2115,40:14 � ! -07'00' James Welles 3249 Project Geologist ed Gec) Reviewed By: JAMES WELLES Thomas Mergy, L Environmental Services Manager Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Sample Location Map Table 1: Laboratory Data Summary Table Attachment A: Borelogs Attachment B: Laboratory Data Attachment C: Toxicity Equivalence Calculations for Carcinogenic PAHs (cPAHs) 41519.003 Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Subsurface Investigation Report September 21, 2018 Page 4 AUTHOR:REVIEWER:Editor 41519.003 Figures ..-. .i.r Y 7 SOURCE: USGS POVERTY BAY, WA QUADRANGLE 1990, PHOTO REVISED 1994. EFEDERAL OLYMPIA SCALE 1"= 2000' VANCOUVER 0' 1,000- 2,000' 4,000' WASHINGTON PREPARED FOR: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS PBSWILDWOOD VICINITY MAP ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 18 41519.003 2405 SOUTH 300TH STREET FIGURE _ FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON I S 300TH ST N WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UST. SEE ENLARGED VIEW FOR DETAILS. _-. SUBJECT PROPERTY AfW-04- WW1=030 ,owWw o1 - J WW-02- ; 64kf :+ w} � • by SOURCE: © 2018 GOOGLE EARTH PRO SITE PLAN SCALE 1" = 150' 0' 75' 150, 300' LEGEND WW-01 SOIL BORING NUMBER AND LOCATION O MANHOLE �p TANK MONITORS ENLARGED VIEW f49 SCALE 1" = 30' PREPARED FOR: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS SOIL BORING LOCATION MAP 1519.0 8 41519.003 WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FIGURE No P B S 2405 SOUTH 300TH STREET FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 2 PARKING EDGE OF LOT BUILDING WW-04 I� APPROX. LOCATION _T OF UST WW-03 � 1 -,�_ r -, O I 0 WW-01 -_I W W-02 la Tables Table 1 - Soil Sample Analytical Results Site: Wildwood Elementary School Address: 2405 S 300th Street, Federal Way, WA PBS Project No. 41519.003 Sample ID Borehole Date Depth (feet b s) TPH BTEX PAR? Diesel (mg/kg) Heavy Oil (mg/kg) Benzene (mg/kg) Toluene (mg/kg) Ethyl- benzene (m /k) Xylenes (total) (m /k) Napthaleneb (mg/k) Benzo(a)pyrere (m /kq) Carcinogenic PAHs (mg/kg) WW-01-10 WW-01 8/29/2018 10.0 <20.7 <51.8 <0.0185 1 <0.0185 <0.0231 <0.0693 WW-01-15 WW-01 8/29/2018 15.0 <19.9 <49.7 <0.0142 <0.0142 <0.0177 <0.0531 - WW-02-07 WW-02 8/29/2018 7.0 1,300 <47.7 <0.0110 <0.0110 <0.0138 <0.0413 - WW-02-11.5 WW-02 8/29/2018 11.5 2,"0 <51.3 <0.0101 <0.0101 <0.0126 <0.0378 0.5665 <0.0435 0.0657 WW-02-17 WW-02 8/29/2018 17.0 <20.0 <49.9 <0.0122 <0.0122 <0.0152 <0.0456 ---- .... WW-03-10 WW-03 8/29/2018 10.0 <19.6 <49.1 <0.0119 <0.0119 <0.0148 <0.0444 ---- - - WW-03-13 WW-03 8/29/2018 13.0 <18.8 <47.1 <0.0127 <0.0127 <0.0158 <0.0475 WW-04-10 WW-04 8/29/2018 10.0 <21.3 1 <53.3 <0.0150 <0.0150 <0.0188 <0.0563 WW-04-14.5 WW-04 8/29/2018 1 14.5 <18.2 <45.6 <0.0121 <0.0121 <0.0152 <0.0455 ---- --•• - MTCA Method A Cleanup Levels' 2,000 2,000 0.03 7 6 9 5 0.1 0.1 Notes• TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbons analyzed by method NWTPH-Dx BTEX = Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes analyzed by USEPA Method 8260C PAHs = polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons analyzed by US EPA method 8270 SIM. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram, equivalent to parts per million (ppm) µg/L = micrograms per liter, equivalent to parts per billion (ppb) <21.1 = not detected above a laboratory reporting limit ---- = not analyzed bold = indicates detection in exceedance of MTCA Method A Cleanup Level 'Only results for select PAHs with established MTCA Cleanup Levels are presented. Acenaphthene, fluorene and phenanthrene were also detected at concentrations of 0.0560, 0.0861 and 0.3030 mg/kg, respectively. bTotal naphthalene concentration presented as sum of naphthalene, 1-methylnaphthalene and 2-methylnaphthalene concentrations `Value for carcinogenic PAHs calculated by toxicity equivalency methodology in WAC 173-340-708(8) and Table 708.2 - see appendix C d Washington State Department of Ecology Method A Soil Cleanup Levels for unrestricted land use. Appendix A Borelogs WILDWOOD UST INVESTIGATION - WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BORING WW 01 FEDERAL WAY, WA '.�PBS PBS PROJECT NUMBER: BORING WW-01 LOCATION: 41519.003 (See Site Plan) DEPTH x o ao MATERIAL DESCRIPTION d w o w a m W H aLU >^ COMMENTS/ WELL INSTALLATION FEET o¢ Of� as �z maw o' w uaiW� 0.0 ASPHALT .• Dense gray -brown gravelly SAND (5W); very fine to very coarse sand; 30% fine to ••: coarse subrounded gravel; trace silt and clay; damp 2.0 — 0.0 e0 0.0 4.0 - Becomes coarse sand; coarse subrounded gravel Hard gray -brown gravelly SAND (SW); •.• 6,0 :;: very fine to very coarse sand; 40% fine to coarse subrounded gravel; no silt or clay; damp 0.0 100 B.0 .• Hard brown SAND (SW) with gravel; very o fine to very coarse sand; 25% fine to 0.0 10.0 coarse rounded gravel; trace silt; damp 3� ' _ 3 12.0 Medium dense gravelly SAND (SW); very •.• -;. fine to very coarse sand; 45% fine to 0.0 100 :•: coarse subangular to subrounded gravel; trace silt; damp Hard gravelly SAND (SW); very fine to =;- very coarse sand; 30% fine to coarse 0.0 :•: subrounded gravel; trace silt; damp 3� ' _ 3 0.0 100 •• 16.0 Final depth: 16.0 ft bgs 1a.o 20.0 BORING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: J. Welles DRILLED BY: Holocene Drilling COMPLETED: 8/29/18 BORING BIT DIAMETER: 21/rinch WILDWOOD UST INVESTIGATION WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BORING WW 02 FEDERAL WAY, WA Ok PBS PBS PROJECT NUMBER: BORING WW-02 LOCATION: Site Plan) 41519.003 (See DEPTH c� xa c� MATERIAL DESCRIPTION d it o w ir a m Lu a � COMMENTS/ WELL INSTALLATION FEET go 0� as 22 o Qa. v C7 c9 mz row w o-o ASPHALT :• Medium dense brown gravelly SAND (SW); very fine to very coarse sand; 30% :•: fine to coarse subrounded gravel; trace •:• silt and clay; damp 0.0 2.0 40 4.0 Blue -gray staining and hydrocarbon odors 6.0 from5.5ft-7ft 297.4 n 4 No recovery from 7 ft - 10 ft 40 8.0 10.0 Hard brown gravelly SAND (SW); very Blue -gray staining and hydrocarbon odors .; : fine to very coarse sand; 40% fine to from 10 ft - 12 ft ;•; coarse subrounded gravel; damp 183.4 o ' 12.0 23.0 100 No hydrocarbon staining or odors observed from 13 ft - 17 ft 14.0 0.2 16.0 80 0.6 ,y •.. 4 _ Final depth: 17.0 ft bgs 18.0 20.0 BORING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY: J. Welles DRILLED BY: Holocene Drilling COMPLETED: 8129/18 BORING BIT DIAMETER: 2'YWnch WILDWOOD UST INVESTIGATION WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FEDERAL WAY, WA BORING WW 03 PBS PBS PROJECT NUMBER: BORING WW-03 LOCATION: (See Site Plan) 41519.003 v o w w n la COMMENTS/ DEPTH T MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w o a M a �> o WELL INSTALLATION FEET �0 X� o a aD rnz Q2w v� 0 yw� w 0.0 ASPHALT •: Dense brown gravelly SAND (SW); very fine to very coarse sand; 30% fine to :•: coarse subrounded gravel; trace silt; damp 2.0 — 0.0 100 4.0 0.0 6.0 • Dense gravelly SAND (SW); very fine to 100 e.o = : • very coarse sand; 30% fine rounded gravel; trace silt; damp 0.0 c 10.0 ••• 100 12.0 — :. �• 0.0 m i : • • o j Final depth: 13.0 ft bgs Sz 14.0 — BORING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY. J. Wanes DRILLED BY: Holocene Drilling COMPLETED: 8129/18 BORING BIT DIAMETER: 2'/winch WILDWOOD UST INVESTIGATION =� WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BORING WW 04 itiPBS FEDERAL WAY, WA PBS PROJECT NUMBER: BORING WW-04 LOCATION: Site Plan) _ 41519.003 (See DEPTH 0 a MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o 0: D o � w it a m 'w � a ga -j � > ^ COMMENTS/ WELL INSTALLATION FEET O¢ �� as �� coz MOo_w rhW� OF w 0.0 ASPHALT Air knife; no recovery Encountered slight fuel odor while air knifing 2.0 4.0 Medium dense light brown gravelly SAND .• (SW); very fine to very coarse sand; 30% 0.0 8.0 �'• fine to coarse subrounded gravel; trace — • silt; dry 100 8,0 — 0.0 0 ' 10.0 Damp at 10 ft 0.0 12.0 100 14.0 Final depth: 14.5 ft bgs 16.o 18.0 20.0 — BORING METHOD: Direct Push LOGGED BY. J. Welles DRILLED BY: Holocene Drilling COMPLETED: 8/29/18 BORING BIT DIAMETER: 2'/rinds Appendix B Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Documentation Fremont 3600 Fremont Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98103 T: (206) 352-3790 F: (206) 352-7178 info@fremontanalytical.com PBS Engineering & Environmental James Welles 2517 Eastlake Ave, E #100 Seattle, WA 98102 RE: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Work Order Number: 1808398 September 13, 2018 Attention James Welles: Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 9 sample(s) on 8/30/2018 for the analyses presented in the following report. Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8270 (SIM) Sample Moisture (Percent Moisture) Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C This report consists of the following: - Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results. Thank you for using Fremont Analytical. Sincerely, C-"+ Chelsea Ward Project Manager DOD/ELAP Certification #L17-135, ISO/IEC 17025.2005 ORELAP Certification: WA 100009-007 (NELAP Recognized) Original www.fremontanalytical.com Page 1 of 29 Fremont _..:Mf7"M7. Date: 09/13/2018 CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Work Order Sample Summary Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Work Order: 1808398 Lab Sample ID 1808398-001 1808398-002 1808398-003 1808398-004 1808398-005 1808398-006 1808398-007 1808398-008 1808398-009 Client Sample ID W W-01-10 WW-01-15 WW-02-07 WW-02-11.5 WW-02-17 WW-03-10 WW-03-13 WW-04-10 W W-04-14.5 Date/Time Collected 08/29/2018 8:20 AM 08/29/2018 8:23 AM 08/29/2018 8:47 AM 08/29/2018 8:56 AM 08/29/2018 9:06 AM 08/29/2018 10:12 AM 08/29/2018 10:15 AM 08/29/2018 12:06 PM 08/29/2018 12:16 PM Date/Time Received 08/30/2018 6:18 PM 08/30/2018 6:18 PM 08/30/2018 6:18 PM 08/30/2018 6:18 PM 08/30/2018 6:18 PM 08/30/2018 6:18 PM 08/30/2018 6:18 PM 08/30/2018 6:18 PM 08/30/2018 6:18 PM Original Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:00AM is assigned Page 2 of 29 Fremont jW-1 i1 i70—I ► I N CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation I. SAMPLE RECEIPT: Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist. Case Narrative W O#: 1808398 Date: 9/13/2018 II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS: Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry -weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry'). Matrix Spike (MS) and MS Duplicate (MSD) samples are tested from an analytical batch of "like" matrix to check for possible matrix effect. The MS and MSD will provide site specific matrix data only for those samples which are spiked by the laboratory. The sample chosen for spike purposes may or may not have been a sample submitted in this sample delivery group. The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples and the MS/MSD to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process. III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS: Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below. Original Page 3 of 29 rr i •' i Fremont M11,07107! 00=1001MEEMONOW Qualifiers: Qualifiers & Acronyms W OM 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 * - Flagged value is not within established control limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D - Dilution was required E - Value above quantitation range H - Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded I - Analyte with an internal standard that does not meet established acceptance criteria J - Analyte detected below Reporting Limit N - Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Q - Analyte with an initial or continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift or minimum RRF) S - Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits ND - Not detected at the Reporting Limit R - High relative percent difference observed Acronyms: %Rec - Percent Recovery CCB - Continued Calibration Blank CCV - Continued Calibration Verification DF - Dilution Factor HEM - Hexane Extractable Material ICV - Initial Calibration Verification LCS/LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate MB or MBLANK - Method Blank MDL - Method Detection Limit MS/MSD - Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate PDS - Post Digestion Spike Ref Val - Reference Value RL - Reporting Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference SD - Serial Dilution SGT - Silica Gel Treatment SPK - Spike Surr - Surrogate Original www.fremontanalytical.com Page 4 of 29 rlFremont Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 8:20:00 AM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-001 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-01-10 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed D Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 20.7 Heavy Oil ND 51.8 Sun-: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 98.0 50 - 150 Sure: o-Terphenyl 95.0 50 - 150 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Benzene ND 0.0185 Toluene NO 0.0185 Ethylbenzene NO 0.0231 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0462 o-Xylene ND 0.0231 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 93.8 56.5 - 129 Sure: Toluene-d8 88.9 64.5 - 151 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 105 54.8 - 168 Sample Moisture (Percent Moisture Percent Moisture 12.5 0.500 Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 1:55:02 AM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 1:55:02 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 1:55:02 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 1:55:02 AM Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 6:44:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 6:44:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 6:44:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 6:44:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 6:44:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 6:44:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 6:44:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 6:44:00 PM Batch ID: R45917 Analyst: NG wt% 1 9/5/2018 10:22:39 AM Original Page 5 of 29 .,�.!�,►� Fremont Analytica Report i AM���,��„ Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 8:23:00 AM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-002 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-01-15 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 19.9 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 2:24:53 AM Heavy Oil ND 49.7 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 2:24:53 AM Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 96.0 50 - 150 %Rec 1 9/6/2018 2:24:53 AM Surr: o-Terphenyl 92.2 50 - 150 %Rec 1 9/6/2018 2:24:53 AM Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN Benzene ND 0.0142 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:16:00 PM Toluene ND 0.0142 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:16:00 PM Ethylbenzene ND 0.0177 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:16:00 PM m,p-Xylene ND 0.0354 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:16:00 PM o-Xylene ND 0.0177 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:16:00 PM Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 94.8 56.5 - 129 %Rec 1 9/12/2018 7:16:00 PM Surr: Toluene-d8 91.1 64.5 - 151 %Rec 1 9/12/2018 7:16:00 PM Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 106 54.8 - 168 %Rec 1 9/12/2018 7:16:00 PM Sample Moisture (Percent Moisture) Batch ID: R45917 Analyst: NG Percent Moisture 8.84 0.500 wt% 1 9/5/2018 10:22:39 AM Original Page 6 of 29 FJ Fremont Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 8:47:00 AM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-003 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-02-07 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Diesel and Hea►►v Oil b►► NWTPH-D Diesel (Fuel Oil) 1,300 19.1 Heavy Oil ND 47.7 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 104 50 -150 Surr: o-Terphenyl 90.1 50 -150 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Benzene ND 0.0110 Toluene ND 0.0110 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0138 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0275 o-Xylene ND 0.0138 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 93.2 56.5 - 129 Surr: Toluene-d8 91.4 64.5 -151 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 110 54.8 - 168 Sample Moisture JPercent Moisture] Percent Moisture 5.82 0.500 Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 2:54:45 AM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 2:54:45 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 2:54:45 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 2:54:45 AM Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:48:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:48:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:48:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:48:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 7:48:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 7:48:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 7:48:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 7:48:00 PM Batch ID: R45937 Analyst: NG wt% 1 9/6/2018 8:40:09 AM Original Page 7 of 29 Fremont �...�07"W"07. Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-004 Client Sample ID: WW-02-11.5 Analyses Result Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Collection Date: 8/29/2018 8:56:00 AM Matrix: Soil RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG Diesel (Fuel Oil) 2,440 103 D mg/Kg-dry 5 9/6/2018 12:33:20 PM Heavy Oil ND 51.3 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 3:24:36 AM Sun-: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 115 50 - 150 %Rec 1 9/6/2018 3:24:36 AM Sun-: o-Terphenyl 87.1 50 - 150 %Rec 1 9/6/2018 3:24:36 AM Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8270 (SIM) Batch ID: 21871 Analyst: IH Naphthalene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM 2-Methylnaphthalene 266 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM 1 -Methyl naphthalene 257 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Acenaphthylene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Acenaphthene 56.0 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Fluorene 86.1 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Phenanthrene 303 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Anthracene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Fluoranthene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Pyrene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Benz(a)anthracene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Chrysene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Benzo(a)pyrene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 43.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Benzo(g,hJ)perylene ND 43.5 Q pg/Kg-dry 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Sun-: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 91.1 12.5 -140 %Rec 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM Sun-: Terphenyl-d14 (surr) 114 45.7 -172 %Rec 1 9/11/2018 12:07:44 AM NOTES: Q - Indicates an analyte with a continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift) Volatile ❑r anic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN Benzene ND 0.0101 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/13/2018 1:06:00 AM Toluene ND 0.0101 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/13/2018 1:06:00 AM Ethylbenzene 0.412 0.0126 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/13/2018 1:06:00 AM m,p-Xylene 0.203 0.0252 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/13/2018 1:06:00 AM o-Xylene 0.0486 0.0126 mg/Kg-dry 1 9/13/2018 1:06:00 AM Sun•: Dibromofluoromethane 95.0 56.5 - 129 %Rec 1 9/13/2018 1:06:00 AM Sum Toluene-d8 114 64.5 - 151 %Rec 1 9/13/2018 1:06:00 AM Original Page 8 of 29 Fremont V• rr�f7frW"PI Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 8:56:00 AM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-004 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-02-11.5 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Volatile Organic Com2punds by EPA Mgthod 8260C Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 119 54.8 -168 Sample Moisture (fercent Moisture) Percent Moisture 9.32 0.500 Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN %Rec 1 9/13/2018 1:06:00 AM Batch ID: R45937 Analyst: NG wt% 1 9/6/2018 8:40:09 AM Original Page 9 of 29 Fremont _w., mMlwiT 1 Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 9:06:00 AM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-005 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-02-17 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Diesel and Heavv 01 Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 20.0 Heavy Oil ND 49.9 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 95.5 50 - 150 Surr: o-Terphenyl 91.3 50 -150 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Benzene ND 0.0122 Toluene ND 0.0122 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0152 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0304 o-Xylene ND 0.0152 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 95.0 56.5 - 129 Surr: Toluene-d8 93.8 64.5 - 151 Sun-: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 110 54.8 -168 Sample Moisture (Percent Moisture) Percent Moisture 6.72 0.500 Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 3:54:28 AM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 3:54:28 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 3:54:28 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 3:54:28 AM Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 8:20:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 8:20:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 8:20:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 8:20:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 8:20:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 8:20:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 8:20:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 8:20:00 PM Batch ID: R45937 Analyst: NG wt% 1 9/6/2018 8:40:09 AM Original Page 10 of 29 Fremont fiTi7MVo f A Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering 81 Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 10:12:00 AM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-006 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-03-10 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Diesel and Heavv Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Diesel (Fuel 011) ND 19.6 Heavy Oil ND 49.1 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 105 50 -150 Surr: o-Terphenyl 101 50 -150 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Benzene ND 0.0119 Toluene ND 0.0119 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0148 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0296 o-Xylene ND 0.0148 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 97.4 56.5 - 129 Surr: Toluene-d8 90.7 64.5 - 151 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 105 54.8 - 168 '141PIL7-A V1V110JIC3lAA Moisture0.501 Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 4:24:22 AM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 4:24:22 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 4:24:22 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 4:24:22 AM Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:23:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:23:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:23:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:23:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:23:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 9:23:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 9:23:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 9:23:00 PM Batch ID: R45937 Analyst: NG wt% 1 9/6/2018 8:40:09 AM Original Page 11 of 29 03 Fremont �-MFMPZM MA Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 10:15:00 AM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-007 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-03-13 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Diesel and Heavv oil by NWTPH-Dx1Dx Ext. Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 18.8 Heavy Oil ND 47.1 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 99.0 50 -150 Surr: o-Terphenyl 94.7 50 - 150 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Benzene ND 0.0127 Toluene ND 0.0127 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0158 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0317 o-Xylene ND 0.0158 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 98.0 56.5 -129 Surr: Toluene-d8 94.5 64.5 - 151 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 108 54.8 -168 SaMRIe Moisture (Percent Moisture) Percent Moisture 7.44 0.500 Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 6:23:35 AM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 6:23:35 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 6:23:35 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 6:23:35 AM Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:55:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:55:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:55:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:55:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 9:55:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 9:55:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 9:55:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 9:55:00 PM Batch ID: R45937 Analyst: NG wt% 1 9/6/2018 8:40:09 AM Original Page 12 of 29 Fremont Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 12:06:00 PM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-008 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-04-10 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed illy-i FTii+il: [�Irl�]1II :I*1 i I'►T� � � `.l'� �i7J }Z'_i �.';(# Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 21.3 Heavy Oil ND 53.3 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 95.7 50 -150 Surr: o-Terphenyl 92.3 50 -150 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Benzene ND 0.0150 Toluene ND 0.0150 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0188 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0375 o-Xylene ND 0.0188 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 92.8 56.5 - 129 Surr: Toluene-d8 89.5 64.5 - 151 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 103 54.8 - 168 6iT_gIq-MQi tune (Percent Moisture) Percent Moisture 9.98 0.500 Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 6:53:29 AM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 6:53:29 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 6:53:29 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 6:53:29 AM Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:27:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:27:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:27:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:27:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:27:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 10:27:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 10:27:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 10:27:00 PM Batch ID: R45937 Analyst: NG Wt% 1 9/6/2018 8:40:09 AM Original Page 13 of 29 r�•'1 .. ` Fremont Analytical Report Work Order: 1808398 Date Reported: 9/13/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/29/2018 12:16:00 PM Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Lab ID: 1808398-009 Matrix: Soil Client Sample ID: WW-04-14.5 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Diesel and Heavv Oil by NWT PH-DxlDx Ext Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 18.2 Heavy Oil ND 45.6 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 99.6 50 - 150 Surr: o-Terphenyl 95.0 50 -150 Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Benzene ND 0.0121 Toluene ND 0.0121 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0152 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0303 o-Xylene ND 0.0152 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 92.3 56.5 - 129 Surr: Toluene-d8 88.3 64.5 - 151 Surr: 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 102 54.8 -168 Sample Moisture Percent Moisture) Percent Moisture 5.80 0.500 Batch ID: 21824 Analyst: SG mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2016 7:23:16 AM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/6/2018 7:23:16 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 7:23:16 AM %Rec 1 9/6/2018 7:23:16 AM Batch ID: 21878 Analyst: TN mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:59:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:59:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:59:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:59:00 PM mg/Kg-dry 1 9/12/2018 10:59:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 10:59:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 10:59:00 PM %Rec 1 9/12/2018 10:59:00 PM Batch ID: R45937 Analyst: NG wt% 1 9/6/2018 8:40:09 AM Original Page 14 of 29 Fremont r;nirlim, a Date: 9/13/2018 Work Order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering $ Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Sample ID MB-21824 SampType: MBLK Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45955 Client ID: MBLKS Batch ID: 21824 Analysis Date: 9/5/2018 SegNo: 890036 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 20.0 Heavy Oil ND 50.0 Sum 2-Fluorobiphenyl 20.0 20.00 99.8 50 150 Surr: o-Terphenyl 19.4 20.00 96.8 50 150 Sample ID LCS-21824 SampType: LCS Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45955 Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 21824 Analysis Date: 9/5/2018 SegNo: 890037 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Diesel (Fuel Oil) 482 20.0 500.0 0 96.3 65 135 Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 20.4 20.00 102 50 150 Surr: o-Terphenyl 19.5 20.00 97.6 50 150 Sample ID 1808397-008ADUP SampType: DUP Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45955 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21824 Analysis Date: 9/5/2018 SegNo: 890039 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 19.1 0 30 Heavy Oil ND 47.7 0 30 Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 20.0 19.07 105 50 150 0 Surr; o-Terphenyl 19.2 19.07 101 50 150 0 Sample ID 1808397-008AMS SampType: MS Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45955 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21824 Analysis Date: 9/5/2018 SegNo: 890040 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Diesel (Fuel Oil) 499 18.0 449.1 0 111 65 135 Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 16.3 17.96 90.5 50 150 Sun': o-Terphenyl 14.7 17.96 81.9 50 150 Original Page 15 of 29 Fremont �+1►�,j11�1 M10 0,R777A Date: 9/13/2018 Work Order: 1808398 OC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Diesel and Heavy Oil by NWTPH-Dx/Dx Ext. Sample ID 1808397-008AMS SampType: MS Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45955 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21824 Analysis Date: 9/5/2018 SegNo: 890040 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Sample ID 1808397-008AMSO SampType: MSD Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45955 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21824 Analysis Date: 9/512018 SegNo: 890041 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Diesel (Fuel Oil) 466 18.6 465.8 0 100 65 135 499.1 6.76 30 Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 21.4 18.63 115 50 150 0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 19.7 18.63 106 50 150 0 Sample ID 1808398-006ADUP SampType: DUP Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45955 Client ID: WW-03-10 Batch ID: 21824 Analysis Date: 9/6/2018 SegNo: 890059 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Diesel (Fuel Oil) ND 21.2 0 30 Heavy Oil ND 53.0 0 30 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 21.0 21.22 99.1 50 150 0 Surr: o-Terphenyl 20.1 21.22 94.8 50 150 0 Original Page 16 of 29 Fremont M1, Mrs MA Date: 911312018 Work Order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering $ Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8270 (SIM) Sample ID MB-21871 SampType: MBLK Units: pg/Kg Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 Client ID: MBLKS Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892207 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Naphthalene ND 40.0 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 40.0 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 40.0 Acenaphthylene ND 40.0 Acenaphthene ND 40.0 Fluorene ND 40.0 Phenanthrene ND 40.0 Anthracene ND 40.0 Fluoranthene ND 40.0 Pyrene ND 40.0 Benz(a)anthracene ND 40.0 Chrysene ND 40.0 Benzo(b) luoranthene ND 40.0 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 40.0 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 40.0 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 40.0 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 40.0 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 40.0 Q Sun•: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 434 500.0 86.9 12.5 140 Surr: Terphenyl-d14 (surr) 502 500.0 100 45.7 172 NOTES: Q - Indicates an analyte with a continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift) Sample ID LCS-21871 SampType: LCS Units: pg/Kg Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892208 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Naphthalene 880 40.0 1,000 0 88.0 50.6 131 2-Methylnaphthalene 851 40.0 1,000 0 85.1 45.1 135 1-Methylnaphthalene 846 40.0 1,000 0 84.6 46.2 133 Acenaphthylene 880 40.0 1,000 0 88.0 32.8 136 Original Page 17 of 29 WlFremont i7fro nij Date: 911312018 Work order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering &Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8270 (SIM) Sample ID LCS-21871 SampType: LCS Units: pg/Kg Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892208 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Acenaphthene 903 40.0 1,000 0 90.3 42 137 Fluorene 871 40.0 1,000 0 87.1 41.4 144 Phenanthrene 899 40.0 1,000 0 89.9 36.6 141 Anthracene 907 40.0 1,000 0 90.7 42.5 157 Fluoranthene 918 40.0 1,000 0 91.8 43.4 144 Pyrene 935 40.0 1,000 0 93.5 39.6 146 Benz(a)anthracene 941 40.0 1,000 0 94.1 54.2 157 Chrysene 917 40.0 1,000 0 91.7 43 165 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 778 40.0 1,000 0 77.8 41 155 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 826 40.0 1,000 0 82.6 30.6 164 Benzo(a)pyrene 733 40.0 1,000 0 73.3 30.2 171 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 665 40.0 1,000 0 66.5 31.3 159 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 646 40.0 1,000 0 64.6 28 158 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 619 40.0 1,000 0 61.9 32.4 144 Sun•: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 444 500.0 88.9 12.5 140 Sun': Terphenyl-d14 (surr) 507 500.0 101 45.7 172 Sample ID 1809054-001ADUP SampType: DUP Units: pg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892210 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowt-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Naphthalene ND 46.6 0 30 2-Methylnaphthalene ND 46.6 47.71 46.5 30 1-Methylnaphthalene ND 46.6 0 30 Acenaphthylene ND 46.6 0 30 Acenaphthene ND 46.6 0 30 Fluorene ND 46.6 0 30 Phenanthrene ND 46.6 0 30 Anthracene ND 46.6 0 30 Fluoranthene ND 46.6 0 30 Original Page 18 of 29 Fremont Date: 9/13/2018 Work Order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering $ Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8270 (SIM) Sample ID 1809054-001ADUP SampType: DUP Units: pg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 ,lient ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892210 knalyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Pyrene ND 46.6 72.48 82.7 30 Benz(a)anthracene ND 46.6 0 30 Chrysene ND 46.6 0 30 Benzo(b) luoranthene ND 46.6 0 30 Benzo(k)fluoranthene ND 46.6 0 30 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 46.6 0 30 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 46.6 0 30 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 46.6 0 30 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 46.6 79.41 129 30 RQ Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 429 582.8 73.7 12.5 140 0 Surr: Terphenyl-d14 (surr) 472 582.8 81.0 45.7 172 0 NOTES: R - High RPD observed. The method is in control as indicated by the LCS. Q - Indicates an analyte with a continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift) Sample ID 1809054-001AMS SampType: MS Units: pg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892211 >nalyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Naphthalene 864 41.8 1,045 35.59 79.3 42.9 138 2-Methylnaphthalene 858 41.8 1,045 47.71 77.5 42.8 151 1-Methylnaphthalene 843 41.8 1,045 34.65 77.4 41.6 148 Acenaphthylene 863 41.8 1,045 0 82.6 32.6 160 Acenaphthene 887 41.8 1,045 0 84.8 31.7 126 Fluorene 848 41.8 1,045 3.595 80.8 43.4 153 Phenanthrene 892 41.8 1,045 8.372 84.6 23.8 135 Anthracene 890 41.8 1,045 0 85.2 32.6 160 Fluoranthene 920 41.8 1,045 7.417 87.3 28 144 Pyrene 954 41.8 1,045 72.48 84.3 27.8 141 Benz(a)anthracene 943 41.8 1,045 0 90.3 34.9 139 Chrysene 896 41.8 1,045 0 85.7 45.2 146 Original Page 19 of 29 Fremont Aw., 1t XMIN Date: 911312018 Work Order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8270 (SIM) Sample ID 1809054-001AMS SampType: MS Units: pg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892211 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Benzo(b)fluoranthene 712 41.8 1,045 0 68.2 42.2 168 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 828 41.8 1,045 0 79.2 20.5 150 Benzo(a)pyrene 714 41.8 1,045 0 68.3 34.4 179 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 591 41.8 1,045 0 56.5 11.8 140 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 642 41.8 1,045 0 61.5 17.3 156 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 587 41.8 1,045 79.41 48.6 24.9 119 Surr: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 426 522.6 81.6 12.5 140 Sun-: Terphenyl-d14 (surr) 515 522.6 98.6 45.7 172 Sample ID 1809054-001AMSD SampType: MSD Units: pg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892212 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Naphthalene 853 41.1 1,026 35.59 79.7 42.9 138 864.1 1.29 30 2-Methylnaphthalene 841 41.1 1,026 47.71 77.3 42.8 151 857.7 2.00 30 1-Methylnaphthalene 829 41.1 1,026 34.65 77.4 41.6 148 843.1 1.73 30 Acenaphthylene 849 41.1 1,026 0 82.7 32.6 160 863.1 1.66 30 Acenaphthene 872 41.1 1,026 0 85.0 31.7 126 886.8 1.67 30 Fluorene 836 41.1 1,026 3.595 81.1 43.4 153 848.3 1.46 30 Phenanthrene 877 41.1 1,026 8.372 84.7 23.8 135 892.2 1.70 30 Anthracene 892 41.1 1,026 0 86.9 32.6 160 890.4 0.123 30 Fluoranthene 904 41.1 1,026 7.417 87.4 28 144 920.2 1.76 30 Pyrene 930 41.1 1,026 72.48 83.5 27.8 141 953.5 2.53 30 Benz(a)anthracene 928 41.1 1,026 0 90.4 34.9 139 943.3 1.61 30 Chrysene 888 41.1 1,026 0 86.5 45.2 146 895.6 0.841 30 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 740 41.1 1,026 0 72.1 42.2 168 712.3 3.85 30 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 762 41.1 1,026 0 74.3 20.5 150 828.0 8.24 30 Benzo(a)pyrene 719 41.1 1,026 0 70.1 34.4 179 713.9 0.725 30 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 571 41.1 1,026 0 55.6 11.8 140 590.6 3.46 30 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 576 41.1 1,026 0 56.1 17.3 156 642.3 10.9 30 Original Page 20 of 29 FlFremont Date: 911312018 Work Order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8270 (SIM) Sample ID 1809054-001AMSD SampType: MSD Units: pg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46059 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21871 Analysis Date: 9/10/2018 SegNo: 892212 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit Highl-imit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 527 41.1 1,026 79.41 43.6 24.9 119 587.0 10.9 30 Sun•: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 384 513.1 74.9 12.5 140 0 Surr: Terphenyl-d14 (surr) 347 513.1 67.6 45.7 172 0 Original Page 21 of 29 WlFremont Date: 911312018 Work order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Sample Moisture (Percent Moisture) Sample ID 1808398-008ADUP SampType: DUP Units: wt% Prep Date: 916/2018 RunNo: 45937 Client ID: WW-04-10 Batch ID: R45937 Analysis Date: 9/6/2018 SegNo: 889507 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Percent Moisture 9.03 0.500 9.982 10.1 20 Sample ID 1808399-005ADUP SampType: DUP Units: wt% Prep Date: 9/6/2018 RunNo: 45937 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: R45937 Analysis Date: 9/6/2018 SegNo: 889514 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Percent Moisture 6.08 0.500 6.151 1.17 20 Original Page 22 of 29 Fremont a M 17n777l Date: 911312018 Work order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Sample Moisture (Percent Moisture) Sample ID 1808412-008ADUP SampType: DUP Units: wt% Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45917 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: R45917 Analysis Date: 9/5/2018 SegNo: 889033 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Percent Moisture 18.9 0.500 18.29 3.12 20 Sample ID 1808397-004ADUP SampType: DUP Units: wt% Prep Date: 9/5/2018 RunNo: 45917 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: R45917 Analysis Date: 9/5/2018 SegNo: 889042 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Percent Moisture 2.94 0.500 2.214 28.2 20 R Original Page 23 of 29 Fremont 7J 7A Date: 9/13/2018 Work Order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering &Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Sample ID LCS-21878 SampType: LCS Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46125 Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 21878 Analysis Date: 9/12/2018 SegNo: 893890 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Benzene 0.911 0.0200 1.000 0 91.1 64.3 133 Toluene 0.846 0.0200 1.000 0 84.6 67.3 138 Ethylbenzene 0.891 0.0250 1.000 0 89.1 74 129 m,p-Xylene 1.92 0.0500 2.000 0 96.0 70 124 o-Xylene 0.932 0.0250 1.000 0 93.2 68.1 139 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 1.20 1.250 96.4 56.5 129 Surr: Toluene-d8 1.16 1.250 93.0 64.5 151 Sum 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 1.37 1.250 110 54.8 168 Sample ID MB-21878 SampType: MBLK Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46125 Client ID: MBLKS Batch ID: 21878 Analysis Date: 9/12/2018 SegNo: 893891 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Benzene ND 0.0200 Toluene ND 0.0200 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0250 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0500 o-Xylene ND 0.0250 Sum Dibromofluoromethane 1.20 1.250 96.2 56.5 129 Sun': Toluene-d8 1.14 1.250 90.8 64.5 151 Sum 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 1.28 1.250 102 54.8 168 Sample ID 1808397-003BDUP SampType: DUP Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46125 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21878 Analysis Date: 9/12/2018 SegNo: 893879 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Benzene ND 0.0138 0 30 Toluene ND 0.0138 0 30 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0172 0 30 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0344 0 30 Original Page 24 of 29 Fremont imp f W rNii11 Date: 911312018 Work Order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Sample ID 1808397-003BDUP SampType: DUP Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46125 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21878 Analysis Date: 9/12/2018 SegNo: 893879 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual o-Xylene ND 0.0172 0 30 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 0.783 0.8600 91.1 56.5 129 0 Surr: Toluene-d8 0.753 0.8600 87.6 64.5 151 0 Sum 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 0.930 0.8600 108 54.8 168 0 Sample ID 1808397-006BMS SampType: MS Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46125 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21878 Analysis Date: 9/12/2018 SegNo: 893883 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Benzene 0.708 0.0130 0.6522 0 109 63.5 133 Toluene 0.636 0.0130 0.6522 0 97.4 63.4 132 Ethylbenzene 0.693 0.0163 0.6522 0 106 54.5 134 m,p-Xylene 1.41 0.0326 1.304 0 108 53.1 132 o-Xylene 0.702 0.0163 0.6522 0 108 53.3 139 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 0.769 0.8153 94.3 56.5 129 Surr: Toluene-d8 0.743 0.8153 91.2 64.5 151 Sum 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 0.954 0.8153 117 54.8 168 Sample ID 1808397-006BMSD SampType: MSD Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46125 Client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21878 Analysis Date: 9/12/2018 SegNo: 893884 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Benzene 0.612 0.0130 0.6522 0 93.9 63.5 133 0.7080 14.5 30 Toluene 0.559 0.0130 0.6522 0 85.7 63.4 132 0.6356 12.8 30 Ethylbenzene 0.632 0.0163 0.6522 0 96.9 54.5 134 0.6930 9.15 30 m,p-Xylene 1.29 0.0326 1.304 0 98.7 53.1 132 1.409 9.05 30 o-Xylene 0.642 0.0163 0.6522 0 98.4 53.3 139 0.7018 8.88 30 Sum Dibromofluoromethane 0.758 0.8153 92.9 56.5 129 0 Surr: Toluene-d8 0.714 0.8153 87.6 64.5 151 0 Sum 1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 0.942 0.8153 116 54.8 168 0 Original Page 25 of 29 INFremont Date: 911312018 - - :1T7PIMP711 Work Order: 1808398 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering 8 Environmental Project: Wildwood Elementary UST Investigation Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260C Sample ID 1808397-006BMSD SampType: MSD Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/10/2018 RunNo: 46125 client ID: BATCH Batch ID: 21878 Analysis Date: 9/12/2018 SegNo: 893884 4nalyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Sample ID 1808398-005BOUP SampType: DUP Units: mg/Kg-dry Prep Date: 9/1012018 RunNo: 46125 client ID: WW-02-17 Batch ID: 21878 Analysis Date: 9/12/2018 SegNo: 894556 4nalyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Benzene ND 0.0122 0 30 Toluene ND 0.0122 0 30 Ethylbenzene ND 0.0152 0 30 m,p-Xylene ND 0.0304 0 30 o-Xylene ND 0.0152 0 30 Surr: Dibromofluoromethane 0.731 0.7603 96.1 56.5 129 0 Surr: Toluene-d8 0.726 0.7603 95.5 64.5 151 0 Surr:1-Bromo-4-fluorobenzene 0.825 0.7603 108 54.8 168 0 Original Page 26 of 29 FlFremont ' I Fr"Tl'MUr■ T7'1 Sample Log -In Check List Client Name: PBS Work Order Number: 1808398 Logged by: Brianna Bames Date Received: 8/30/2018 6:18:00 PM Chain of Custody 1. Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes ❑d No ❑ Not Present ❑ 2. How was the sample delivered? Client Log In 3. Coolers are present? Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ 4. Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes ❑d No ❑ 5. Custody Seals present on shipping container/cooler? Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Required ❑� (Refer to comments for Custody Seals not intact) 6. Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ 7. Were all items received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C* Yes No ❑ NA ❑ 8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes ❑ No ❑ 9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes ❑ No ❑ 10. Are samples properly preserved? Yes ❑ No ❑ 11. Was preservative added to bottles? Yes ❑ No W NA ❑ 12. Is there headspace in the VOA vials? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑d 13. Did all samples containers arrive in good condibon(unbroken)? Yes No ❑ 14. Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No ❑ 15. Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No ❑ 16. Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes .I❑ No ❑ 17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes ❑ No ❑ 5necial Handling Cif applicable) 18. Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑d Person Notified: Date By Whom: Via: ❑ eMail ❑ Phone ❑ Fax ❑ In Person Regarding: Client Instructions: 19. Additional remarks: Item Information Item # Temp °C Cooler 8.9 Sample 4.6 * Note: DoD/ELAP and TNI require items to be received at 4°C +/- 2°C Original Page 27 of 29 3600FremontAveN. Seattle, WA 98103Tel: Chain of Custody Record & Laboratory Services Agreement rlFmmont206-352-3790 j Fax: 206-352-7178 laboratory Project No (internal): _Date: Z �„�._....—..........._...Pa�em..m........_..... of: _. �^ m _ ecial Remarks: Project Name: {1 Pmjest No: L I . t�0.. T...... _ ». ... _....__......1_............... ..w......_. __._.... Client: _.......t...... » _ __.._..._ _ Address: � � 11 } ._. Collected by. __. .m... » W ., _ ...._ .» »... _ ..» ..._._ »_ [ity, Stata, Zip: W j�C �� ... Location: t E �, _ J��tC4 Telephone. rZ aG Lj — C7 ` Sample Disposal: ❑ Return to client XDisposal Report To (PM]: by lab (after 30 days) Fax: PM Email: y a a 6 its ye:. Sample P$ry S`�rpa a tr P q �� q • `.' 1 •Oti1 Sample Sample Type C7��q �`4� oyc� `dse ��� lyiti �yl�Pea�y; •y8�y 9��~ `` Sample Name Date Time I(Matrix]' J� t�� �� G o hJ qP QL •' �° Comments x - Z Zo IX 2 I)w -b - 1� 0f�7- s �cc 3 11••,,W 4 K/W'0Z�11• Q J 51 W -O —�q Oiqs 6 10 10I2 X W- 03-� lol S O 1,tW - o - Io l z S !0 *Matrix: A = Air, AQ= Aqueous, B = Bulk, 0 = Other, P = Product, S = Soil, SD = Sediment, SL = Solid, W = Water, DW = Drinking Water, GW = Ground Water, SW = Storm Water, W W = Waste Water _.. _ ...... ...... .._......... -_ ... ...... _...._._.............»..................... __... __._.......... ...... ..»...... ............... .__._. K Mg Mn Mo Na Ni Pb Sb Se Sr Sn Ti TI U V Zn Turn —around Time. **Metals (Circle): MTCA-5 RCRA-8 Priority Pollutants TAL Individual: Ag Al As B Ba Be Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Hg _.r. ........... ..--_ ... m... M . Standard » . ..............m ... » » ................... _...... ,...........-.....--..-. ***Anions (Circle): Nitrate Nitrite Chloride Sulfate ... Bromide O-Phosphate Fluoride Nitrate+Nitrite 3 Day I represent that 1 am authorized to enter into this Agreement with Fremont Analytical on behalf of the Client named above and that I have verified Client's agreement to each of the terms on the front and backside of this Agreement. _ Q 2 Day Next Day Relinquished Date/Time I Rece ed Da jTime x x }�j 3°�ig $ / VVV Relinquished Date/Time ,i�J Receiv Da /Time Same Day x x (specify) OD N Q) tm W IL COC 1.2 - 2-22.17 www.fremontanalytical.com Page 1 of 2 3600 Fremont Ave N. Seattle, WA 98103 Chain of Custody Record & Laboratory Services Agreement Oftemo� Tel: 206-352-3790Date: Ls�--tS Laboratory "ect ft (internal), I Remarks: Project Name ., RIM wf:�Tff -206 -717B Fax. -352 1Client: t3 Address. collected by; J' ... ........ City, State, _W Telephone: RepartTo(PM)* Sample Disposal: ❑ Return to client Disposal by lab (after 30 days) ----------- Fax; PM Email: 14V Sample I? 4P q _q r Sample Name Sample Date Sample Time Type mainx) Ct. 'z Comments t. 4-W 0 44 (AXt) 4C1 IS 0 ft'� WW-01 0 r,/ 4 W!�Q -032- 10 10 vL ? L&) (A) - 0 9 10 Frrl *Matrix; A=Air, AQzAqueous, B=Sulk, 0=Other, P=Product, 5=561, SID=Sedimern, 51.=Solid, VV=Water, DW Drinking Water, GW-GroundWater, SW-StormWater, WW=Waste water .......... ................. . . .. .... ... . ....... ............................................... . ............... .......... ......... ...... - — --------- - ­­ . .... ...... **Metals (Circle): h4rCA-5 RCRA-8 Priority Pollutants TAL Individijol: AS Al As B Ba Ile Ca Cd Co, Cr Cu Fe Hg K Mg Mr. Mo Na Ni Pb Sb Sc Sr Sn Ti Ti U V Zn Turn -around Time: L_;� St-nd3rd ***Anions (Circle): Nitrate Nitrite Chloride Sulfate Bromide 0 Phosphate Fluoride Nittate+Nr1rite 0 30ay I represent that I am authorized to enter into (his Agreement -A ith Fremont Anal3fical on behalf ol'the Client named above and that 1 have verified Client's agreement to each of the terms on the front and backside of this Agreement. L-1 2 Day 0 Next Day Relinquished Oate/Tirste Recei4ed Da!fume . ...... ....... Relinquished DateMme .......... Receiv Dal /Time Same Day I bpe-ify) COC 12 - 2 22,17 www.fremontanalytical.com Page I of 1 Appendix C Toxicity Equivalence Calculations for Carcinogenic PAHs (cPAHs) Attachment C. Toxicity Equivalence Calculations for Carcinogenic PAHs (CPAHs) in Sample WW-02-11.5 It should be noted that the calculation of carcinogenic PAHs (cPAHs) must be performed in accordance with MTCA regulations to determine whether cPAH concentrations meet MTCA level A requirements. The calculation methodology is given in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) Section 173-340-708(8), and the Toxicity Equivalence Factors (TEFs) to be used in the calculations are given in MTCA Section 173-340-900 Table 708-2 which is reproduced below: Benzo(a)pyrene Equivalent Toxicity Equivalency Concentration Concentration Factor (TEF) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) benzo(a)pyrene 1 0.0435 0.0435 benzo(a)anthracene 0.1 0.0435 0.00435 benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.1 0.0435 0.00435 benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.1 0.0435 0.00435 chrysene 0.01 0.0435 0.000435 dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.1 0.0435 0.00435 indeno 1,2.3-cd rene 0.11 0.0435 0.00435 RESULT 0.065685 MTCA Method A Cleanup Level 10.1 mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram Note: No carcinogenic PAHs were detected above laboratory reporting limits. Concentrations used represent laboratory reporting limit of non -detect result April 15, 2019 Ray Vefik Federal Way Public Schools Capital Projects 1211 S 232"d St Federal Way, WA 98004 Email: rvefik@fwps.org fwpscpl8@fwps.org RECEIVED JUN 24 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY OOMMllNiiY DEIIELOP�IzNT RE: Wildwood Elementary School — Supplemental Arsenic and Lead Soil Sampling 2405 S 3001 Street, Federal Way, Washington PBS Project #41519.003 Federal Way Public Schools (FWPS) has contracted PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. (PBS) to evaluate the potential for arsenic and lead contaminants in near surface soils at the site of Wildwood Elementary School (WES) prior to site redevelopment as part of the Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Project. This Supplemental Arsenic and Lead Soil Sampling Report presents the findings of supplemental sampling performed surrounding locations with arsenic exceedances in April 2019 to delineate the extent of impacted soil. Results of supplemental sampling provide basis for soil requiring remediation as outlined in Specification 02 61 00 Contaminated Soil Management, included in the bid package for construction of the new Wildwood Elementary School. The scope of services for supplemental sampling was presented in the Proposal for Additional Soil Sampling, Contract Document Development and Construction Period Services (WA29091) by PBS, dated March 27, 2019. BACKGROUND On September 28, 2018 PBS performed soil sampling activities to determine the levels of arsenic and lead in shallow soil at WES in Federal Way, Washington. Findings of the sampling activities and recommendations for regulatory compliance of impacted soils were presented in the Wildwood Elementary School Arsenic and Lead Soil Sampling Report dated October 12, 20181. The report identified two locations where arsenic concentrations exceeded Washington State Department of Ecology's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A cleanup level (CUL) criteria for unrestricted land use. Additional soil samples were collected surrounding the exceedance in April 2019 to delineate the extent of impacted soil. CHARACTERIZATION SOIL SAMPLING Analytical results from soil samples collected on site in September 2018 were below MTCA Method A CULs for arsenic, except for three (3) samples. Arsenic was detected in exceedance of the CUL in the six-inch sample from WW-2-01 at a concentration of 22 mg/kg and the six and twelve -inch samples from WW-2-03 at concentrations of 30.8 mg/kg and 26.7 mg/kg, respectively. All other sample results for arsenic and lead were below the MTCA Method A cleanup level of 20 mg/kg and 250 mg/kg, respectively. 1 Wildwood Elementary School —Arsenic and Lead Soil Sampling Report, PBS Engineering and Environmental, October 12, 2019. 214 E GALER STREET, SUITE 300, SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN • 866.727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Elementary School Arsenic and Lead Sampling Report April 15, 2019 Page 2 Supplemental sampling was conducted in April 2019 to bound the lateral and vertical extent of arsenic contaminated soil. Two (2) discrete samples were collected from locations 10 feet and 25 feet to the north, south, east and west from locations WW-2-01 and WW-2-03 at depth intervals of zero to six inches below ground surface (bgs) and six to twelve inches bgs to bound the horizontal extent of impacted soil. Samples collected 25 feet from the two locations and samples collected from six to twelve inches bgs were submitted to the laboratory on hold pending results of samples collected 10 feet from the two locations and at depths of zero to six inches bgs. If closer or shallower sample results exceeded cleanup levels, additional samples were analyzed to bound the extent of impacted soil. Because the six to twelve -inch sample at location WW-2-03 exceeded the Method A CUL, two (2) discrete samples were collected from that location at depth intervals of twelve to eighteen inches and eighteen and twenty-four inches to bound the vertical extent of impacted soil. Because the six to twelve -inch sample from location WW-2-01 did not exceed the CUL, no additional sampling was required at that location to bound the vertical extent of impacted soil. Soil sample collection started just below any surface cover layer (e.g., sod or grass). A hand spade and a hand auger were used to complete 6-inch deep test holes. A soil sample was collected at a depth of less than six inches below ground surface at each location. The test holes were then advanced to a depth of twelve inches, and a soil sample was collected at a depth between six and twelve inches bgs. In locations of deeper samples, test holes were then advanced to depths of eighteen and twenty-four inches bgs for collection of samples between twelve and eighteen, and eighteen and twenty-four inches bgs, respectively. PBS personnel wore disposable nitrite gloves to protect against cross -contamination between samples. Soil retained for analysis was packed into laboratory -provided containers, labeled and transported on ice under chain of custody documentation to Friedman and Bruya, Inc. in Seattle, an Ecology accredited analytical laboratory. Samples were analyzed for total arsenic and lead using EPA Method 6020. Total arsenic and lead results were reported on a dry weight basis. ANALYTIC RESULTS Analytical results from supplemental soil samples collected on site are below MTCA Method A CULs for arsenic, except for the six-inch sample collected ten feet north, east and west of location WW-2-03, the six and twelve - inch samples collected twenty-five feet north of location WW-2-03. CONCLUSIONS Based on the analytical results of the supplemental soil sampling the following conclusion and recommendations were made regarding the handling and management of project site soils. Soil surrounding original sample location WW-2-03 and supplemental sample locations WW3-1ON, WW3-25N, WW3-10E and WW3-10W should be remediated to a depth of twelve inches bgs. Soil surrounding original sample location WW-2-01 should be remediated to a depth of six inches bgs. Proposed remediation methods include 41519.003 Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Elementary School Arsenic and Lead Sampling Report April 15, 2019 Page 3 excavation and offsite disposal of impacted soils. Areas requiring remediation as well as procedures and requirements of soil removal are presented in Specification 02 61 00 Contaminated Soil Management, included in the bid package for construction of the new Wildwood Elementary School. LIMITATIONS This investigation was conducted to characterize lead and arsenic distributions in shallow soils surrounding previously identified arsenic and lead contaminated locations on -site, with a focus on protection of human health and the environment. The data collected in this investigation are not intended for the purposes waste profiling for offsite disposal, or for estimation of volume or tonnage of soil requiring disposal. PBS has prepared this report for use by FWPS. This report is not intended for use by others without the written consent of the FWPS. Our interpretation of soil conditions in this study was based on field observations and analytical data from the indicated explorations. Regulated substances may exist in portions of the site that were not explored or analyzed. The conclusions in this report are not to be considered a legal opinion as the client's duty concerning due diligence relating to potential liabilities in leasing, owning, or purchasing real estate. PBS ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INC. Digitally signed by James Welles s Date: 2019.04.15 16:13:38 07'00' James Welles, LG Project Geologist Reviewed By: Digitally signed by Thomas sir t lh� Mergy Date:2019.04.15 16:24:39 -07'00' Thomas Mergy, LHG Environmental Services Manager Attachments: Table 1: Laboratory Data Summary Table Attachment A: Laboratory Data 41519.003 Tables Site: Address: PBS Project No. Table 1 - Soil Sample Analytical Results Lake Grove Elementary School 303 SW 308th Street, Federal Way, WA 41519.000 Location / Sample Identification Description Sample Depth (inches bgs) Metals Arsenic m /k Lead (mg/kg) Regulatory Criteria MTCA Method A Cleanup Level 20 2S0 Delineation Samples Surrounding Sample LG-3-18 LG-10S-a 10 feet south of LG-3-18 0-6 22.8 92.7 LG-25S-a 25 feet south of LG-3-18 0-6 5.9 19.8 LG-10E-a 10 feet east of LG-3-18 0-6 6.69 13.9 LG-10N-a 10 feet north of LG-3-18 0-6 11.2 46.9 LG-25W-a 25 feet west of LG-3-18 1 0-6 3.17 9.80 Average 10.0 36.6 LG-3-18-b Original sample location 6-12 28.3 64.0 LG-3-18-c 6 inches below LG-3-18-b 12-18 2.41 4.06 LG-3-18-d 12 inches below LG-3-18-b 18-24 2.01 2.47 LG-10S-b 10 feet south of LG-3-18 6-12 27.7 75.1 LG3-10S-c 6 inches below LG-10S-b 12-18 12.0 24.7 LG3-10S-d 12 inches below LG-10S-b 18-24 7.81 15.0 Average 13A 30.9 Arsenic and lead analyzed by US EPA Method 6020 mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram bold = concentration exceeds adopted criteria bgs = below ground surface Attachment A Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Documentation DRAFT Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG-25Wa Client: Date Received: 04/03/19 Project: Date Extracted: 04/04/19 Lab ID: Date Analyzed: 04/04/19 Data File: Matrix: Soil Instrument: Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 3.17 Lead 9.80 PBS Engineering and Environmental Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation 904102-01 904102-01.143 ICPMS2 SIP Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG-10Sa Client: Date Received: 04/03/19 Project: Date Extracted: 04/04/19 Lab ID: Date Analyzed: 04/04/19 Data File: Matrix: Soil Instrument: Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 22.8 Lead 92.7 PBS Engineering and Environmental Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation 904102-02 904102-02.146 ICPMS2 SP Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG-10Ea Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: 04/03/19 Project: Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation Date Extracted 04/04/19 Lab ID: 904102-12 Date Analyzed: 04/04/19 Data File: 904102-12.147 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPM82 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 6.69 Lead 13.9 Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG-10Na Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: 04/03/19 Project: Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation Date Extracted: 04/04/19 Lab ID: 904102-14 Date Analyzed. 04/04/19 Data File: 904102-14.150 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 11.2 Lead 46.9 Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG-3-18b Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: 04/03/19 Project: Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation Date Extracted: 04/04/19 Lab ID: 904102-15 Date Analyzed: 04/04/19 Data File: 904102-15.151 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 28.3 Lead 64.0 Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: Method Blank Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: Not Applicable Project: Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation Date Extracted: 04/04/19 Lab M: I9-226 mb Date Analyzed: 04/04/19 Data File: I9-226 mb.141 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic <1 Lead <1 rem��t 3600Fremont AveN. Chain of Custod Record & o a ices Agreement Seattle, WA 98103 Tel:206-352-3790 ` /■y laboratory Project Noflatemalj: Date: u 1 ` �ae:..�..._.._..._o�^�! �,�, Fax: 206-352-7178 _I_ _ __ _................_._. _ Special Remarks: Pmje[t Name: .,... [�-;.. w�.{..�.':'•� �"�7� 1 !� �� i • dierk: Prolert No: [ [ 00 O Address E �� , }} �� �Ilectea>y: � elt tN fl.� trLfr- CRY, State, Zip: S} {.4 Location: i► __ .. _ r _..._..- . _ _...... .. _ __...__ �.. .. __... Telephone: 1.,Lts— �p \ Re art To PM } i3. Sample Disposal: ❑ Return to client ❑ Disposal by lab (after 30 days) Fax: PM Email: n4,,,.gi w eA4 j 8. n 6S V$�+ • G0M•1 9��i`�LawW eta b,�yl l�� $� Oltia;, •A\ 4"CD Sample Sample Date Sample TyP %NameSamP!e Time ( i. G � �fl P rc Comments > L 2 - to Sa, 02 l3$0 ' 3 - S S•� 03 k4oL D 4 LV `w"6 Q i s os l3zs L — 2S tiJe, � 7 g LG -2s Eb o$ IS55 .� 9 L& — 2S S o? 13So i 10 L6 - 2-S E, ,to, 13 g I •Matrix: A=AIr, Aq=Aqueous, B=Bulk O=Other, P=product, S=Soil, SD=Sediment, SL=Solid, W=Water, OW -Drinking Water, GW=Ground Water, SW=Storm Water, WW=Waste Water Turn -around Time., W-...... • °fVl.. C ....: MTCJ1-S RCRA 8 P'riority Pollutants TAL lridivldua7: ng N S Ba Be Ca Cd Co Gr Cu Fe Hg K Mg Mn Mo Na Ni b h Se Sr Sn Ti TI U V Zn ••'Anions (Circle): Nitrate Nitrite Chloride Sulfate Bromide O-PhDs hate Fluoride Nltrate+Nitrite �"`..........• - ' "' Standard I represent that l am authorized to enter into this Agreement with Fremont Analytical u behalf of the Client named above and that l have verified Client's agreement to 0 3 Day each of the terms on the front and backside of this Agreement. Relinquished D R to"me ece d t❑ 2-Day a2,2� �me • 'x Next Day ae Relinquis d rtx_..... �_..._ _ 4.. ate i Date/iime Same Day (spec - !/yl OCf.2- F R f 7y w .al.r;vm r T`�Let��?��� Page laf2 �yw— fremontanalytic 4 (o Z 3600 Fremont Ave N. FM �1 �I Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206-3S2-3790 �Ifi�ii_ji Fax:206-352-7178 Telephane:�e sG� 1 7 Fax: Q 4 am�Ie Name d 1 Sample Date Sample Sample Type Time (Matrwi. - to F 0IFO,A,I T b 8 t&E Chain of Custody Record Email: GcJ WQ I JQ% 5G1 . Lon►t 8T 7,rato vices A reement PjtofocNntemal): 44-1dal Remarks: Sample Disposal: 0 Return to client ❑ Disposal by lab (after 30 days) 'MatrFx:TA=Air, pQAqueous, B-Bulk O=Other, P=Product S=Sail, SD=Sedlmem, SL=Solid, W=Water, DW Drinking Water, GW=GroundWate, SW=Storm Water, WW=Waste Water Turn -aroandTim e: eta (Qrcle): MICA-5 KRA-8 Priority Pollutants TAL Individual: AS A B Ba Be Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe Ng K Mg Mn MO Na Ni b Se Sr S. TI 1U V Z. •'*An ions (an;;).. Nitrate Nkiite CFiloi(de Sulfate Bromide O-Fhosphate ffu Ede NitratefNitrite � -w 0. Standard I represent that I am authorized to enter into this Agreement with4A...n h b Rif of the Client named above and that I have verified Client's agreement to D 3 Day each of the terms on the front and backside of this Agreement, teEEnquished ` i?ata SEme +� tc� ❑ 2Day q extOain uis T, DatejiMma �- -_� __..N ylemc Same Day �:ocr-z_a.z2.l7 montanalytical.comtSl�e,ue_-, Pagelof2 q� samples received !at1 a DRAFT Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG-25Sa Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: 04/03/19 Project: Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation Date Extracted: 04/08/19 Lab ID: 904102-03 Date Analyzed: 04/08/19 12:35:06 Data File: 904102-03.049 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Arsenic 5.92 Lead 19.8 Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG-10Sb Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: 04/03/19 Project: Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation Date Extracted: 04/08/19 Lab ID: 904102-06 Date Analyzed: 04/08/19 12:39:49 Data ale: 904102-06.050 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Arsenic 27.7 Lead 75.1 Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: Method Blank Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: Not Applicable Project: Lake Grove As/Pb Delineation Date Extracted: 04/08/19 Lab ID: I9-234 mb Date Analyzed: 04/08/19 12:58:36 Data File: I9-234 mb.054 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Arsenic <1 Lead <1 '-?b 9 10 2, t - 3600 Fremont Ave N. fre � Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206-352-3790 Fax.,206-352-7178 Chain of Custody Record ' 13 A 45 t' l llent: P 155 I Far: _ __..._w.._ .._.._........ Project No: S i o0 0 by. E S/' Sop ^Collected (i t t`! j r � -._ ........_._... �__ _ ...M._... x�—• ,M__�_. _.._. Locatlon: �y� G Ate_.._ �_...__. ....-.__. Report's iPMi: �G1titi.�-f..,' ►I�,I.��� .Y. Y PM Email: ^flll,a[�/oW a lls f (� b+jL/Cy . GO " aob� q�iO y� �aq ryq.= c OD Sample ��� c4e too tiQV � kq!�,tibe,��q $tip 4 x� Q4 4� are �Pp� Ltt 04-oLI-[q Sample Name Sample Date Sample Time Type (Matrix)' LG SI,,J of 14!3 13kq S 2 L6Z tO Sp Q2 t3 4 I 3 S S, 03 135 0 9 r 5 L6 - LSnjLi o5 t32s i 6 L(- l o sy oW 1 11 ,, L 2 — Is /J.& 07 I S25 t 8 L•G Is Eh o8 13g5 g L,G - 25 C.o? 1354 Ili L-6`'TS Fa. iD ('31fg •Matrix: A=Ai►, AQ=Aqueous, 8=Bulk, O=Other, — _....-.. _ ....� P=Product, S=5o11, SD=•Sediment, SL=Solid, W=Water, OW=Drinking Water, GW=Ground Water, SW-Sti ._... - _.._.._. ••tHetals (GMe): MTCA-5 _ .w __... .._.. �._...�.__...... RCRA-8 Priority Pollutants TAL ._ .... __.._ .... .---. T. .. �_...-.m......_ —. _ ...... _..... �fndlvlduoh Ag�N &D8 Ba Be Ca Cd Cn Cr Cu Fe Hg K Mg Mn Mo n a Ni t, h •*•Anions jCircle): Nitrate Nitrite Chloride Sulfate Bromide O-Phosphate Fluoride Nitrate+Nitrite I represent that i am authorized to enter into this Agreement with Fremont Analytical otL behalf of the Client named above and that l ha, each of the terms on the front and backside of this Agreement. ` f i Relin X 1.2 -T.PZ 120 W�W,fremtontanalytical com ra vices A reement Laboratory Project No (lnternaQ. Special Remarks: Sample Disposal: ❑ Return to client ❑ Disposal by lab (after 30 days) Comments D rm Water, W W = Waste Water .....»_.Sr._..Sn._.....T!. Tl —UV_---.._...._.w ......... Se Zn _..._._..._. __� �._.__...._--...... ,e verified Clienes agreement to 1 �......_.....__...... 77 7 _ Turn -around Time: ❑ Standard ❑ 3 Day ❑ 2.-Day Next Day Same Day fsPec�l c 240 Page 1 of 2 2 4 ro Z 12-6 G 3600 Fremont Ave N. Seattle, WA 98103 ,u. Tel* 206-352-3790 Fax:206-352-7178 f,kE ST 1C,hrain of CUStod Record or r a orat�ices A reement Date s'{ /r Page: L of: tob"toJyPr"edNoiMlemol). Projectee.» l� f, + Special Remark: triiame: �^�p —�m.._� Calircted hy: �• �1�.�t..".i�j _ � ■ Location, Report To {pM): P►'�4 _ j��s— Sample Disposal: ❑ Return to client © Disposal by lab (after 30 days) Fax: ■ PM Enoll: KA-G 5 t> 0 �J� . cat, Sample o� o;• b �L ao� • $ample Name Sample Sample Type q�ti qa°� 4ac �0 4Pa V ��QP O�Sy L� �� Date Time [Matrix}• as �'4k �".� tea`' �,�L ai+ yt] QQ't' 4�$ ct'er'�a`a Qc'A �q0' LD �G �-(o t^a _ 12 1313 13 1318 — (o 1'1a 1 130, L.G -3-1 b 15 1�30 7 'Matrix: A=Air, AQ = Aqueous, B - Bulk, 0 = Other, P = Product S = Sall, SO=Sediment, SL=Solid, WIWater, DW =Drinking Water, GW =Ground Water, SW =Storm Water, WW a Waste Water __— _-�.. _. Tun-oround Time: ••Metals{Cirde}: MTCA-S RCRA-8 Priority Pollutants TAL lndividuoL' __�w..�_.__..W. -� — AgAI 8 BaBeCaCdCoCrCuFefigKMgMn MO NV bSeSrSn7ITIUVZn ~ "•Anions (Grde): Nitrate Nitiite CFilciide Sulfate liromide R-Phosphate FI ide NltrateMitrite - —n. �_V __ O• Standard 1 represent that 1 am authorized to enter into this Agreement with Fremont Anal ca n b ha if Of the Client named above and that I have verified Client's agreement to 0 3 Day each of the terms on the front and backside of this Agreement. telinquixhed flatel%me tee ❑ 2 Day Recefv lnquis —•.."`— _ .-• Next Day R ived tef5m _ Jx .057 Same Day (sp�ly OC'•2-2.22.f' w w.fremontanal lcal.com c Yt Q R-e_�,e iu` Samples received at 1 0C Pagelof2 DRAFT Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG3-18-c Client: Date Received: 04/09/19 Project: Date Extracted: 04/10/19 Lab ID: Date Analyzed: 04/10/19 Data File: Matrix: Soil Instrument: Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 2.41 Lead 4.06 PBS Engineering and Environmental 41519.000, F&BI 904190 904190-01 904190-01.068 ICPMS2 SP Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG3-18-d Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: 04/09/19 Project: 41519.000, F&BI 904190 Date Extracted: 04/10/19 Lab ID: 904190-02 Date Analyzed:, 04/10/19 Data File: 904190-02.071 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 2.01 Lead 2.47 DRAFT Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG3-10S-c Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: 04/09/19 Project: 41519.000, F&BI 904190 Date Extracted: 04/10/19 Lab ID: 904190-03 Date Analyzed: 04/10/19 Data File: 904190-03.072 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 12.0 Lead 24.7 DRAFT Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6020B Client ID: LG3-10S-d Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: 04/09/19 Project: 41519.000, F&BI 904190 Date Extracted 04/10/19 Lab ID: 904190-04 Date Analyzed: 04/10/19 Data File: 904190-04.073 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic 7.81 Lead 15.0 DRAFT Analysis For Total Metals By EPA Method 6O2OB Client ID: Method Blank Client: PBS Engineering and Environmental Date Received: Not Applicable Project: 41519.000, F&BI 904190 Date Extracted: 04/10/19 Lab ID: I9-244 mb Date Analyzed: 04/10/19 Data File: I9-244 mb.066 Matrix: Soil Instrument: ICPMS2 Units: mg/kg (ppm) Dry Weight Operator: SP Concentration Analyte: mg/kg (ppm) Arsenic <1 Lead <1 SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODY y Report To ,� SAMPLERS (signature) ) Ps e # TURNAROUND TD& 'Company PR AME ..PO # 13 Standard Turnaround -Address '2a§-!c• �31 �t'a l.. UUSH Rush ebarps au « itp, State, ZTP REMARILS INVOICE TO SAMPLE DISPOSAL' days Phon 7�0 �i 631 . . Email .ti...e w f Sure Gpjc:i E] Archive Samples t] Outer ANALYSES REQUESTED • _ m � N o Sample M Lab lbDate Sampled Time Sample # Of A � eq co � o --n Sampled Type Jars w � Notes CD o G Lo,L SIGNATURE madman & 8 ya rn� PRxNT NAME COMPANY . DATE TM. �� SOUP 1b'eiAvewe Wegr Received IV- _ SeW1k.WA 98.119-2029 R(599;aed by: L T P.h. (")285-8282 xeoeived by. Samples rece, —O(�' -- JUN 2 4 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUN[TY DEVELOPMENT Hazardous Materials Survey Report Wildwood Elementary School Replacement 2405 South 300th Street Federal Way, Washington Prepared for: Federal Way Public Schools 1211 South 332"d Street Federal Way, WA 98003 April 2, 2019 PBS Project No. 41519.003 7-'PBS 214 EAST GALER STREET SUITE 300 SEATTLE, WA 98102 206.233.9639 MAIN 866.727.0140 FAX PBSUSA.COM Hazardous Materials Survey Report Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way Public Schools Federal Way, Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background...................................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Survey Process............................................................................................................................................................................1 2 FINDINGS............................................................................................................................................................1 2.1 Asbestos -Containing Materials(ACMs)............................................................................................................................1 2.2 Lead -Containing Components.............................................................................................................................................3 2.3 Mercury -Containing Components......................................................................................................................................3 2.4 PCB -Containing Components........................................................................................................................... 2.5 Arsenic and Lead -Contaminated Soil................................................................................................................................3 3 RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................................................................4 3.1 ACMs..............................................................................................................................................................................................4 3.2 Lead -Containing Components.............................................................................................................................................4 3.3 Mercury -Containing Components.................................................... 4 3.4 PCB -Containing Components...............................................................................................................................................4 3.5 Arsenic and Lead -Contaminated Soil................................................................................................................................ 5 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: PLM Bulk Sampling Information PLM Bulk Sample Inventory PLM Bulk Sample Laboratory Data Sheets and Chain of Custody Documentation APPENDIX B: AA Lead Paint Chip Sampling Information AA Lead Paint Chip Sample Inventory AA Lead Paint Chip Laboratory Data Sheets and Chain of Custody Documentation APPENDIX C: Bulk PCB Sampling Information Bulk PCB Sample Inventory Bulk PCB Laboratory Data Sheets and Chain of Custody Documentation APPENDIX D: Certifications 02017 PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. 19 � Project April P, 0 i PBS Pro d No. 41519.00303 Hazardous Materials Survey Report Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way Public Schools Federal Way, Washington INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc. (PBS) performed a hazardous materials survey of Wildwood Elementary School located at 2405 South 300th Street, Federal Way, Washington, in conjunction with the planned demolition of the structure. The intent of this investigation is to ensure that Federal Way Public Schools is in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements that a "good faith inspection" for ACMs be performed prior to demolition activities. At the request of Federal Way Public Schools, all accessible areas of the building were inspected for the presence of asbestos -containing materials (ACMs), lead -containing paint (LCPs), PCB -containing light ballasts, and mercury -containing fluorescent lamps. 1.2 Survey Process Accessible areas included in the project scope were inspected by AHERA Certified Building Inspectors Janet Murphy (Cert. No. 167197 Exp. 5/2/2019), Justin H. Day (Cert. No. IR-18-6181 B Exp. 04/25/2019), and Willem Mager (Cert. No. 165414 Exp. 2/7/2019). PBS endeavored to inspect all accessible areas of the scope of work. Inaccessible areas consist of those requiring selective demolition, fall protection, or confined space entry protocols in order to gain access. When observed, suspect materials were sampled. All samples were assigned a unique identification number and transmitted for analysis to Seattle Asbestos Test (NVLAP #201057-0) under chain -of -custody protocols. Samples were analyzed according to EPA Method 60OR-93/116 using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM), which has a reliable limit of quantification of 1 % asbestos by volume. Information regarding the type and location of sampled materials can be found on the attached PLM Sample Inventory. Suspect ACMs may exist in inaccessible areas. PBS endeavored to determine the presence and estimate the condition of suspect materials in all inaccessible areas included in the scope of work. While PBS has endeavored to identify the ACM that may be found in concealed locations, additional unidentified ACM may exist. 2 FINDINGS 2.1 Asbestos -Containing Materials (AGMs) PBS collected twenty (124) bulk samples of suspect asbestos -containing materials. The following materials were determined to contain greater than 1% asbestos: 9" Vinyl Floor Tile and Black Mastic on Concrete o under carpet- Rooms 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, and all hallways and entrances. (approx. 25,250 SF); o exposed - all storage rooms (approx. 100 SF); Residual Black Mastic - under non -ACM 12" vinyl floor tile and yellow mastic in rooms 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 201, 201, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212 at counters and in room 170 (audio visual room), Gym, Gym Teacher's office and gym storage (approx. 3,750 SF); • Black Mastic - under non -ACM 12" vinyl floor tile in the 1985 addition, Rooms 302, 303, 304, 308, storage rooms in 308, office 170, staff workroom, and Teacher's lounge (approx. 4,250 SF). April 2, 2019 PBS 1 PBS Project No. 41519.003 Hazardous Materials Survey Report Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way, Washington • Hard Mudded Fittings (elbows, "T's, Hangers) - associated with fiber -glass straight -run pipe in various exposed locations throughout and concealed within wall cavities and ceilings (approx. 350 EA); • Brown Door Frame Sealant — exterior door frames throughout (approx. 700 LF); ■ Fire Door (presumed) — throughout (approx. 45 EA); ■ Gaskets (presumed) —boiler room (approx. 65 EA); • Cement Asbestos Pipe (assumed) — buried water/sewer pipe throughout site (approx. 800 LF); • Joint Compound Associated with Gypsum Wallboard Assemblies (<1% composite) — throughout; The following materials were determined to contain less than 1% asbestos: a Vermiculite (<1% tremolite) —in exterior walls throughout;; The following materials sampled and found not to contain detectable concentrations of asbestos: • Tan Sealant Between Stucco Panels — throughout; • Grey/White Window Frame Sealant — throughout; • White/Clear Door Frame Sealant — portable 70/110 and 213/134; • Grey Roof Sealants at Smoke Stacks, Roof Vents and Flashing — throughout roof, • Built-up roofing — over classrooms, office, Gym and Play Court, ■ Wall Stucco — exterior walls; a Storefront Window Panel — Room 106; • 3 Tab Roofing — all portable roofs; e Brick and Mortar — brick walls throughout. a HVAC Flex Duct Connectors — attic space above boiler room; ■ Duct Insulation and Mastic — attic space above boiler room; a Fiberglas With Black Mastic — Unit ventilators; a Black Mastic — in speaker boxes throughout; • Black and Gray Undercoats — on steel sinks throughout and drinking fountain; • 12" Ceiling Tile with Fissures — throughout, • 12" Ceiling Tile with Brown Mastic — throughout, • 12" White and Light Blue Vinyl Floor Tile and Yellow Mastic — Gym; • 2' X 4' Ceiling Tile with Fissures — throughout; a 2' X 4' Ceiling Tile with Small Holes — throughout; a Beige/Brown Covebase Mastic — on walls throughout; a Yellow Carpet Mastic — throughout, ■ Red Gaskets — in boiler room; a Pipe Patch at Headers (endcap) — boiler room; a Wall Paper with Mastic — portables; a Plastic and Loose Fill Insulation — portables; a Black Paper Under Siding — Portable 21/109; • Black Paper Under Floor — Portable 70/110; ■ Brown/Tan/White Covebase Mastic — on walls throughout; ■ 1" Ceramic Tile/Mastic/Grout/Plaster — on restroom walls and curbs throughout; a 4" Ceramic Tile/Mastic/Grout — window sills throughout; a Wall Plaster— restrooms; April 2, 2019 2 PBS Project No. 41519.003 Hazardous Materials Survey Report Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way, Washington Sheet Vinyl Flooring with Blue and Pink Dots — restrooms associated with office and restrooms in 207/144. For a complete listing of representative bulk sampling and associated laboratory analysis, refer to the Attachments. For locations and quantities see hazardous materials drawings associated with the demolition project. 2.2 Lead -Containing Components Eight (8) representative painted coatings were sampled for lead content. The samples were assigned unique identification numbers and transmitted to NVL Laboratories, Inc. (AIHA IH #101861) in Seattle, Washington under chain -of -custody protocols for analysis using Flame Atomic Absorption. Lead was detected in three (3) of the eight (8) samples collected in concentrations ranging from 0.1400% to 0.2600%. See attachments for location and result of paint samples. Refer to the attachments for an inventory of paint samples collected and associated laboratory analysis. 2.3 Mercury -Containing Components All fluorescent light tubes are presumed to contain mercury. Approximately 1,430 four -foot fluorescent light tubes, and 12 eight -foot fluorescent light tubes were identified. 2.4 PCB -Containing Components PBS inspected representative fluorescent light fixture ballasts throughout various locations in each building. 10 stage lights associated with the gym are presumed to be PCB containing. Light fixture ballasts inspected throughout the rest of the building were observed to have "No PCB" labeling. PBS recommends all ballasts be inspected prior to disposal. Magnetic ballasts should be presumed to contain PCBs and properly removed, stored, transported and disposed of in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303 Dangerous Waste Regulations and 40 CFR Part 761 Subpart D. Five (5) representative materials were sampled for PCB content. The samples were assigned unique identification numbers and transmitted to NVL Laboratories, Inc. and Fremont Analytical, Inc. in Seattle, Washington under chain -of -custody protocols for analysis using EPA 8082 method. No samples were found to contain PCBs above laboratory reporting limits. For a complete listing of representative bulk sampling and associated laboratory analysis, refer to the Attachments. 2.5 Arsenic and Lead -Contaminated Soil The project site is located within the widespread soil contamination plume of the former Asarco Tacoma smelter operation. As such, PBS performed lead and arsenic soil sampling throughout the site. Soil sampling performed by PBS identified detectable concentrations of arsenic and lead in near surface soils throughout the site. The results of the lead and arsenic soil sampling can be found in the Arsenic and Lead Soil Sampling Report prepared by PBS and dated October 12, 2018. PB , April2, .019 03 3 PBS Pro ed No. 41519003 Hazardous Materials Survey Report Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way Public Schools Federal Way, Washington 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 ACMs PBS recommends that all exposed and concealed ACM to be impacted by the remodel be removed prior to construction activities. A qualified Washington State licensed asbestos abatement contractor should be employed to remove all such ACM according to applicable local, state and federal regulations. Asbestos -containing joint compound associated with non -asbestos gypsum wallboard (GWB) assemblies were found in various locations throughout building. The presence of asbestos in the joint compound requires personnel impacting the material to adhere to regulatory requirements outlined in WAC 296-62-17712(2) and training as outlined in WAC 296-62-07722(5) and WAC 296-62-0728. Refer to WISHA Regional Directive 23.30 for additional information. The possibility exist that suspect ACM may be present in equipment, wall and ceiling cavities, and in select areas included in the scope of renovations. These may include, but are not limited to waterproofing membrane, vermiculite, internal gaskets, caulking and sealants of HVAC equipment and construction adhesives and wall mastics. In the event that suspect ACM is uncovered during construction, contractors should stop work immediately and inform the owner promptly for confirmation testing. All untested materials should be presumed asbestos -containing or tested for asbestos content prior to impact. While not observed, additional suspect -ACM may be present in concealed spaces, which are discussed above. Caution should be exercised during selective demolition to prevent impact of suspect-ACMs. All suspect ACMs should be presumed asbestos -containing until properly sampled and analyzed. 3.2 Lead -Containing Components Representative painted coatings were found to contain lead by laboratory analysis. Impact of painted surfaces with detectable concentrations of lead requires construction activities to be performed according to Washington Labor and Industries regulations for Lead in Construction (WAC 296-62-155). Workers impacting LCP should be provided the proper personal protective equipment and use proper work methods to limit occupational and environmental exposure to lead until an initial exposure assessment has been conducted. Painted coatings may exist in inaccessible areas of the work area or in secondary coatings. Any previously unidentified painted coatings should be considered lead containing until sampled and proven otherwise. All waste shall be handled in accordance with WAC 173-303. 3.3 Mercury -Containing Components Fluorescent lamps are known to contain mercury and mercury vapors. All fluorescent lamps at this site are presumed to be mercury -containing. PBS recommends that all fluorescent lamps be carefully handled and recycled/disposed of in accordance with the contract documents and applicable regulations during demolition activities. Breakage of lamps should be avoided to prevent potential exposures to mercury. Washington Department of Safety and Health requires specific training, handling, engineering controls and disposal practices when performing this work. All waste shall be handled in accordance with WAC 173-303. 3.4 PCB -Containing Components PBS recommends all light ballasts be inspected prior to disposal. Magnetic ballasts should be presumed to contain PCBs and properly removed, stored, transported and disposed of in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303 Dangerous Waste Regulations and 40 CFR Part 761 Subpart D. Electronic ballasts do not contain PCB's and can be disposed of as general debris in compliance with applicable codes and endpoint facility requirements. April 2, 2019 P Bs 4 PBS Project No.41519.003 Hazardous Materials Survey Report Federal Way Public Schools 3.S Arsenic and Lead -Contaminated Soil Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way, Washington PBS recommends all activities which disturb site soils be performed using appropriate dust control and worker protection in accordance with L&I regulations for Lead in Construction (WAC 296-62-155) and Arsenic (WAC 296-848). Report prepared by: Digitally signed C�,�_ - by Justin H. Day Date:2019.04.08 �] 14:09:54-07'00' Justin H. Day AHERA Building Inspector Cert. No. IR-18-6181B Exp. 04/25/2019 Report reviewed by: Digitally signed by MarkA. Hiley Date: 2019.04.08 15.47.40-07'00' Mark Hiley Senior Project Manager IN PBS April 2, 2019 PBS Project No. 41519.003 APPENDIX A PLM Bulk Sampling Information PLM Bulk Sample Inventory PLM Bulk Sample Laboratory Data Sheets PLM Bulk Sample Chain of Custody Documentation Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type 41519.003 -1 Insulation (gray/gold) Vermiculite 41519.003 -2 12" Floor Tile (white with brown streaks) Yellow Mastic 41519.003 -3 12" Floor Tile (Light blue) Yellow Mastic 41519.003 -4 4" Beige Covebase Beige Mastic 41519.003 -5 12" Floor Tile (white brown streak) Black Mastic 41519.003 -6 3" Brown covebase Brown Mastic 41519.003 -7 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile (dots) Brown Mastic 41519.003 -8 1' x 1' Ceiling Tile (dots) Brown Mastic 41519.003 -9 Gypsum Wallboard Joint Compound (composite) 41519.003 -10 2' x 4' Suspended Ceiling Tile - fissured 41519.003 -11 Carpet Mastic 41519.003 -12 Insulation - hot water TSI 41519.003 -13 Pipe Patch at Headers (end cap) 41519.003 -14 Gasket (red) at Valve PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Sample Location Lab Description Lab Result Lab Gym (100) - west wall panel interior Layer 1: Tan/brown flaky material NAD SAT Gym (100) - southwest wall panel Layer 1: Beige/white tile NAD SAT Layer 2: Yellow/clear mastic NAD Gym (100) - east area Layer 1: Light blue/gray tile NAD SAT Layer 2: Yellow/clear mastic NAD Gym (100) - east wall Layer 1:Beige rubbery material NAD SAT Layer 2: Beige mastic NAD Storage (101) - floor Layer 1: White tile NAD SAT Layer 2: Yellow/clear mastic NAD Layer 3: Black mastic 2% Chrysotile Storage (101) - floor Layer 1: Brown rubbery material NAD SAT Layer 2: Beige/brown mastic with paint NAD Kitchen (102) - ceiling Layer 1: Brown rubbery material NAD SAT Layer 2: Beige/brown mastic with paint NAD East Corridor by Gym (100) Layer 1: Brown rubbery material NAD SAT Layer 2: Beige/brown mastic with paint NAD Library Office (179) - west wall Layer 1: Trace white powdery material NAD SAT Layer 2: White chalky material with paper NAD Library (177) - ceiling Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with paint NAD SAT Library (177) Layer 1: Yellow mastic NAD SAT Layer 2: Gray foamy material NAD Boiler Room (105) Layer 1: Tan paper with black mastic NAD SAT Layer 2: Silver foil NAD Layer 3: Tan paper with black mastic NAD Layer 4: Yellow fibrous material NAD Boiler Room (105) - south Layer 1: Off-white brittle material NAD SAT Layer 2: Yellow fibrous material NAD Boiler Room (105) - south header manifold Layer 1: Red softlelastic material NAD SAT mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 1 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type 41519.003 -15 Door Sealant (brown) Exterior 41519.003 -16 Window Storefront Panel 41519.003 -17 2' x 4' Suspended Ceiling Tile - rough 41519.003 -18 Floor Tile (white, brown, gray streaks) Black Mastic Under Carpet 41519.003 -19 Mudded Fitting (6") at Joints/Hangers 41519.003 -20 Floor Tile (white brown/gray streaks) Black Mastic Under Carpet 41519.003 -21 V x 1' Ceiling Tile (rough texture) Brown Mastic 41519.003 -22 Mudded Fittings - 6" Joints 41519.003 -23 9" Floor Tile (white brown/gray streaks) Black Mastic 41519.003 -24 1 x 1 Ceiling Tile (rough texture) Brown Mastic 41519.003 -25 Stucco - White - Exterior 41519.003 -26 Stucco - White - Exterior 41519.003 -27 Carpet Mastic PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Sample Location Lab Description Exterior of Boiler Room (105) - Layer 1: Brown/gray soft material frame/casing Interior by 106 - east corridor (steal Layer 1: Silver metal with paint casing and fiber mat) Layer 2: Brown fibrous material with paint East Corridor by classroom 121 Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with paint Classroom (116) - unknown size (9"? Layer 1: Yellow mastic Layer 2: White tile Layer 3: Black mastic Layer 4: Trace gray fibrous material East corridor ceiling by classroom 124 Layer 1: White powdery material with woven East corridor by classroom 117/116 Layer 1: Trace yellow mastic Layer 2: White tile Layer 3: Black mastic North corridor by office 168 Layer 1: Brown fibrous material with paint Layer 2: Brown mastic East corridor plenum by Classroom 112 Layer 1: White powdery material with woven fibrous material Northwest closet (161) Layer 1: Yellow/clear mastic Layer 2: White tile Layer 3: Black mastic North centered corridor by classroom 167 Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with paint Layer 2: Brown mastic North Exterior by Classroom 162 Layer 1: Gray/white sandy/brittle material with paint West Exterior by Classroom 153 Layer 1: Gray/white sandy/brittle material with paint West Corridor by Classroom 145 Layer 1: Yellow tile Layer 2: Gray foamy material Lab Result Lab 4% Chrysotile SAT NAD SAT NAD NAD SAT NAD SAT 2% Chrysotile 3% Chrysotile NAD 6% Chrysotile SAT NAD SAT 2% Chrysotile 4% Chrysotile NAD SAT NAD 5% Chrysotile SAT NAD SAT 2% Chrysotile 3% Chrysotile NAD SAT NAD NAD SAT NAD SAT NAD SAT NAD mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 2 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type 41519.003 -28 9" Floor Tile (white brown/gray streaks) Black Mastic 41519.003 -29 4" Covebase (tan) Beige Mastic 41519.003 -30 Door Brown Sealant - Exterior 41519.003 -31 Batted Ceiling Insulation 41519.003 -32 East Roof Core - 3" and Rigid Insulation 41519.003 -33 West/Middle Roof Core 3" Rigid Insulation Sample Location Lab Description West Corridor Closet 142/143 Classroom 153 by sink counter Classroom 144 - exterior door frame Storage Room 106 - attic ceiling access East Roof - Built up roof West Roof (mid/center) - roll roof 41519.003 -34 Roof Shingles (red) and Vapor Barrier Middle Main Roof - pitched PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Layer 1: Yellow/clear mastic Layer 2: White tile Layer 3: Black mastic Layer 1: Brown rubbery material Layer 2: Beige mastic with paint Layer 1: Brown/gray soft material Layer 1: Silver foil Layer 2: Brown paper with mastic Layer 3: Yellow fibrous material Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand Layer 2: Black asphaltic material Layer 3: Black asphaltic material with fibrous material Layer 4: Black asphaltic material Layer 5: Black asphaltic material with sand Layer 6: Black asphaltic material Layer 7: Brown fibrous material Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand Layer 2: Black asphaltic material Layer 3: Black asphaltic material with sand Layer 4: Black asphaltic material Layer 5: Black asphaltic material with fibrous material Layer 6: Black asphaltic material Layer 7: Brown fibrous material Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand Layer 2: Black asphaltic material with fibrous material Layer 3: Black asphaltic material Layer 4: Black asphaltic material with sand Layer 5: Black asphaltic material with fibrous material Lab Result Lab NAD SAT 2% Chrysotile 4% Chrysotile NAD SAT NAD 4% Chrysotile SAT NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD NAD mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 3 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type Sample Location 41519.003 -35 Gypsum Wallboard Office 172 - copy room Joint Compound - Composite 41519.003 -36 Roof Shingles (black) and Vapor Barrier Portable 107 - roof 41519.003 -37 Carpet Mastic - brown Portable 107 - floor 41519.003 -38 Wood Panel Portable 107 - wall Glue 41519.003 -39 2' x 4' Suspended Ceiling Tile - fissured Portable 107 - ceiling PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Lab Description Lab Result Lab Layer 1: White powdery material 2% Chrysotile SAT Layer 2: White chalky material with paper NAD Composite Result <1 % Chrysotile Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD SAT Layer 2: Black asphaltic material with fibrous NAD material Layer 3: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 1: Trace brown mastic NAD SAT Layer 2: Brown wood block NAD Layer 1: Off-white softlelastic material NAD SAT Layer 2: Trace clear mastic NAD Layer 3: Brown fibrous material NAD Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with paint NAD SAT mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 4 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. Federal Way Public Schools PBS Project #41519.003 PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Twe Sample Location Lab Description Lab Result Lab 41519.003 -40 Tan sealant Exterior stucco panel / North Elevation Layer 1: Tan soft/elastic material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -41 Tan sealant Exterior stucco panel / West Elevation Layer 1: Tan soft/elastic material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -42 Grey sealant Exterior window frame / West Elevation Layer 1: Grey soft/elastic material NAD SAT 41519.003 -43 Grey sealant Exterior window frame / North Elevation Layer 1: Grey soft/elastic material NAD SAT 41519.003 -44 Grey roof sealant Roof / Base of smoke stack Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD SAT 41519.003 -45 Grey roof sealant Roof / Smoke stack penetration Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD SAT 41519.003 -46 Grey roof sealant Roof / Roof vent Layer 1: Grey soft/elastic material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -47 Grey roof sealant Roof / Flashing Layer 1:Grey soft/elastic material NAD SAT 41519.003 -48 Built up roofing Roof / Above East/West hallway -south Layerl : Black asphaltic material with sand NAD SAT of entrance Layer 2: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 3: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 4: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 5: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD Layer 6: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 7: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD Layer 8: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD Layer 9: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 10: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 11: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD 41519.003 -49 Built up roofing Roof / Above East hallway Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD SAT Layer 2: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 3: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 4: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 5: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 6: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 7: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 8: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 5 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. Federal Way Public Schools PBS Project #41519.003 PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Time Sample Location Lab Description Lab Result Lab Layer 9: Brown fibrous material NAD Layer 10:Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD Layer 11: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 12: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD 41519.003 -50 Built up roofing Roof / covered walkway Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD SAT Layer 2: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 3: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 4: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 5: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 6: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 7: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 8: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 9: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD Layer 10: Brown fibrous material NAD Layer 11: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD Layer 12: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 13: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 14: Black asphaltic material NAD 41519.003 -51 Vermiculite Gym exterior wall Layer 1: Tan/brown flaky material <1 Tremolite SAT 41519.003 -52 Stucco Exterior North elevation - West side Layer 1: Gray sandy/brittle material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -53 Stucco Exterior North elevation - East side Layer 1: Gray sandy/brittle material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -54 Stucco Exterior Wall outside Room 106 Layer 1: Gray sandy/brittle material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -55 Stucco Exterior Wall outside Room 104 Layer 1: Gray sandy/brittle material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -56 Stucco Exterior West elevation - North side Layer 1: Gray sandy/brittle material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -57 Stucco Exterior North elevation - Center Layer 1: Gray sandy/brittle material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -58 Stucco Exterior West elevation - South side Layer 1: Gray sandy/brittle material with paint NAD SAT mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 6 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. Federal Way Public Schools PBS Project #41519.003 PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type Sample Location Lab Description Lab Result Lab 41519.003 -59 HVAC Mechanical Isolation Cloth On duct in Attic space above boiler Layer 1: Gray fibrous material NAD SAT room 41519.003 -60 Duct insulation On duct in Attic space above boiler Layer 1: Silver foil NAD SAT room Layer 2: Gray soft material NAD Layer 3: Brown fibrous material NAD 41519.003 -61 Brick and mortar Boiler room north wall Layer 1: Gray/pink sandy/brittle material with NAD SAT paint Layer 2: Tan sandy/brittle material NAD Layer 3: Trace black mastic NAD 41519.003 -62 Fiberglass and black mastic Unit ventilator - room 302 Layer 1: Black fibrous material NAD SAT Layer 2: Black mastic NAD 41519.003 -63 Black speaker box mastic Speaker box - Boiler room Layer 1: Black mastic NAD SAT 41519.003 -64 Black undercoat On sink in Library office Layer 1: Black soft/loose material NAD SAT 41519.003 -65 Black undercoat Under steel sink - Room 302 Layer 1: Black soft/loose material NAD SAT 41519.003 -66 Black undercoat On drinkimg fountain in hall at Library Layer 1: Black soft/loose material NAD SAT 41619.003 -67 12" ceiling tile with fissures Room 403 Layer 1: White fibrous material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -68 12" ceiling tile with brown mastic Hall outside Admin office Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with trace paint NAD SAT Layer 2: Brown mastic NAD 41519.003 -69 12" ceiling the with brown mastic Kitchen Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with trace paint NAD SAT Layer 2: Brown mastic NAD 41519.003 -70 12" ceiling tile with brown mastic East hallway Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with trace paint NAD SAT Layer 2: Trace brown mastic NAD mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 7 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. Federal Way Public Schools PBS Project #41519.003 PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type Sample Location Lab Description Lab Result Lab 41519.003 -71 12" ceiling tile with brown mastic Hall outside Room 203 Layer 1: Gray fibrous material NAD SAT Layer 2: Brown mastic NAD 41519.003 -72 2' x 4' ceiling tile with fissures Room 302 Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -73 2' x 4' ceiling tile with fissures Storage room south of room 308 Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -74 2' x 4' ceiling tile with small holes East hallway Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -75 2' x 4' ceiling tile with small holes Hallway outside Room 307 Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with paint NAD SAT 41519.003 -76 Wall paper with mastic Room 212 Layer 1: Trace brown mastic NAD SAT Layer 2: Off-white soft/elastic material with NAD woven fibrous material Layer 3: Tan mastic NAD 41519.003 -77 Composite Joint compound / Gypsum Room 302 Layer 1: Trace white powdery material NAD SAT Wallboard Layer 2: White chalky material with paper NAD 41519.003 -78 Composite Joint compound / Gypsum Attic space above boiler room Layer 1: White powdery material NAD SAT Wallboard Layer 2: White chalky material with paper NAD 41519.003 -79 Composite Joint compound / Gypsum Room 201 Layer 1: White powdery material NAD SAT Wallboard Layer 2: White chalky material with paper NAD 41519.003 -80 Composite Joint compound / Gypsum Storage room south of room 308 Layer 1: White powdery material with paint NAD SAT Wallboard Layer 2: White chalky material with paper NAD 41519.003 -81 Counter laminate and mastic Teacher's office in room 308 Layer 1: White/brown brittle/rigid material NAD SAT Layer 2: Red mastic NAD Layer 3: Brown wood block NAD mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 8 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Twe 41519.003 -82 Counter laminate and mastic 41519.003 -83 Brown cove base mastic 41519.003 -84 Off-white and brown cove base mastic 41519.003 -85 2" purple with speck ceramic tile 41519.003 -86 2" purple ceramic curbing 41519.003 -87 Beige ceramic tile, mastic and grout 41519.003 -88 Beige ceramic tile, mastic and grout Sample Location Teacher's lounge Storage room south of room 308 Room 149 (212) Men's restroom outside boiler room Men's restroom outside boiler room On window sill / Room 107 On window sill / Room 302 41519.003 -89 2" ceramic curbing with yellow and grey Restroom south of Gym mastic PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Lab Description Layer 1: Light purple/brown brittle/rigid material Layer 2: Red mastic Layer 3: Brown wood block Layer 1: Brown mastic Layer 1: Off-white mastic Layer 2: Brown mastic Layer 1: Purple ceramic Layer 2: Gray brittle/sandy material Layer 1: Purple ceramic Layer 2: Trace beige mastic Layer 3: Brown paper Layer 4: Black softielastic material Layer 1: Beige ceramic Layer 2: Gray brittle/sandy material Layer 3: White brittle material Layer 4: Trace white mastic Layer 1: Beige ceramic Layer 2: Gray brittle//sandy material Layer 3: White brittle material Layer 4: Trace white mastic Layer 1: Beige ceramic Layer 2: White brittle/sandy material Layer 3: Trace yellow/gray mastic Layer 4: Brown paper 41519.003 -90 2" ceramic curbing with yellow and grey Restroom associated with room 308 Layer 1: Beige ceramic mastic April 2, 2019 Layer 2: White brittle/sandy material Layer 3: Trace yellow/gray mastic Layer 4: Brown paper mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram < = Less than the Limit of Detection Lab Result Lab NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD SAT NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD 9of14 Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type Sample Location PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Lab Description Lab Result Lab 41519.003 -91 1" ceramic wall tile, grout, glue and Room 201 Layer 1: Beige/off-white ceramic Gypsum Wallboard Layer 2: White brittle/sandy material Layer 3: Yellow mastic Layer 4: White chalky material with paper 41519.003 -92 Carpet mastic Library office Layer 1: Blue woven fibrous material Layer 2: Gray/clear mastic Layer 3: Gray foamy material Layer 4: Gray brittle/sandy material 41519.003 -93 Tan pebble pattern with blue and pink dot Restroom floor associated with office Layer 1: Tan sheet vinyl sheet vinyl flooring and teacher's lounge Layer 2: Gray fibrous material with mastic 41519.003 -94 12" beige with grey streak vinyl floor with Room 206 near sink (addition) Layer 1: Beige tile black mastic Layer 2: Trace black mastic Layer 3: Gray brittle/sandy material 41519.003 -95 12" beige with grey streak vinyl floor with Room 308 (addition) Layer 1: Beige tile black mastic Layer 2: Black mastic 41519.003 -96 12" beige with brown streak vinyl floor tile Room 179 (AV room) Layer 1: Beige tile with yellow mastic / residual black mastic 41519.003 -97 12" beige with brown streak vinyl floor tile Room 201 NW with yellow mastic / residual black mastic NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD SAT NAD NAD NAD SAT 3% Chrysotile NAD SAT Layer 2: Yellow mastic NAD Layer 3: Trace black mastic NAD Layer 1: Beige tile NAD Layer 2: Yellow mastic NAD Layer 3: Trace black mastic 2% Chrysotile SAT mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 10 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type Sample Location 41519.003 -98 12" beige with brown streak vinyl floor tile Room 102 @ cpt/tile line near sink with yellow mastic / residual black mastic 41519.003 -99 12" beige with brown streak vinyl floor tile Room 103 with yellow mastic / residual black mastic 41619.003 -100 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown Room 208 SW streak vinyl floor tile with black mastic 41519.003 -101 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown West hallway outside Room 206 streak vinyl floor tile with black mastic PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Lab Description Lab Result Lab Layer 1: Beige tile NAD SAT Layer 2: Yellow mastic NAD Layer 3: Trace black mastic 2% Chrysotile Layer 1: Beige tile NAD SAT Layer 2: Yellow mastic NAD Layer 3: Trace black mastic NAD Layer 1: Yellow mastic NAD SAT Layer 2: Beige tile 3% Chrysotile Layer 3: Black mastic 4% Chrysotile Layer 1: Yellow mastic NAD SAT Layer 2: Beige tile Layer 3: Black mastic 41519.003 -102 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown Room 211 NE Layer 1: Brown mastic streak vinyl floor tile with black mastic Layer 2: Beige tile Layer 3: Black mastic Layer 4: Gray brittle/sandy material 41519.003 -103 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown East/West hallway @ West entrance Layer 1: Yellow mastic streak vinyl floor tile with black mastic Layer 2: Beige tile Layer 3: Black mastic 41519.003 -104 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown Room 201 NW Layer 1: Yellow mastic streak vinyl floor tile with black mastic Layer 2: Beige tile Layer 3: Black mastic mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 3% Chrysotile 4% Chrysotile NAD SAT 2% Chrysotile 4% Chrysotile NAD NAD SAT 3% Chrysotile 3% Chrysotile NAD SAT 3% Chrysotile 4% Chrysotile 11 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type Sample Location Lab Description 41519.003 -105 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown Room 403 Layer 1: Yellow mastic streak vinyl floor tile with black mastic PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Lab Result Lab NAD SAT Layer 2: Beige tile 3% Chrysotile Layer 3: Black mastic 4% Chrysotile 41519.003 -106 Grey leveling compound North of double door entrance to center Layer 1: Gray brittle material NAD White leveling compound hallway Layer 2: Yellow mastic NAD 9" beige with brown streak vinyl floor tile Layer 3: White brittle material NAD Black mastic Layer 4: Yellow mastic NAD Layer 5: Beige tile NAD Layer 6: Black mastic 4% Chrysotile 41519.003 -107 Tan sheet vinyl, pebble patter with blue Room 207 / 144 RR Layer 1: Tan sheet vinyl NAD and pink spots Layer 2: Gray fibrous material with mastic NAD 41519.003 -108 Gray sink undercoat Room 205 / 140 Layer 1: Gray soft/loose material NAD 41519.003 -109 Black paper under siding Portable 21 / 109 Layer 1: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD 41519.003 -110 Yellow mastic under second layer of Portable 21 / 109 Layer 1: Yellow/clear mastic carpet Layer 2: Brown wood block NAD 41519.003 -111 Black paper under floor Portable 70 / 110 Layer 1: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD 41519.003 -112 Tan cove base mastic Portable 70 / 110 Layer 1: Tan mastic NAD Layer 2: Brown fibrous material NAD 41519.003 -113 White 2 x 4 lay -in ceiling tiles with Portable 70 / 110 Layer 1: Gray fibrous material with white paint fissures 41519.003 -114 3 tab red roof shingles with masic Portable 70 / 110 Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD 3 tab gray roof shingles with mastic Layer 2: Black asphaltic material NAD Black paper Layer 3: Black asphaltic material with sand NAD Layer 4: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 5: Clear plastic NAD Layer 6: Black asphaltic fibrous material NAD SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 12 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. Federal Way Public Schools PBS Project #41519.003 PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type Sample Location Lab Description Lab Result Lab 41519.003 -115 White door frame sealant Portable 70 / 110 Layer 1: White soft/elastic material NAD SAT 41519.003 -116 White window frame sealant Portable 70 / 110 Layer 1: White soft/elastic material NAD SAT 41519.003 -117 Clear door frame sealant Portable 213 / P4 Layer 1: White /clear soft/elastic material NAD SAT 41519.003 -118 Plastic and loose fill insulation Portable 213 / P4 Layer 1: Gray fibrous material NAD SAT Layer 2: Blue plastic NAD 41519.003 -119 Black sealant on electrical wire Portable 213 / P4 Layer 1: Black/dark brown soft/elastic material NAD SAT penetration on exterior wall next to HVAC Layer 2: Brown fibrous material with paint 41519.003 -120 Wall plaster West Wing RR Layer 1: White brittle material 41519.003 -121 Wall plaster West Wing RR Layer 1: White brittle material 41519.003 -122 Wall plaster East Wing RR Layer 1: White brittle material 41519.003 -123 Wall plaster East Wing RR Layer 1: White brittle material 41519.003 -124 Wall plaster Room 201 / 167 RR Layer 1: White brittle material 41519.003 -125 Black and white granular roofing Gym Roof Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand Black asphaltic roofing Layer 2: Black asphaltic material Brown insulation Layer 3: Black asphaltic material Black asphaltic paper Layer 4: Black asphalti material with fibrous material Layer 5: Black asphaltic material with fibrous material Layer 6: Brown fibrous material Layer 7: Black asphaltic material with fibrous material Layer 8: Black asphaltic material with fibrous material 41519.003 -126 Black and white granular roofing Play Court Roof Layer 1: Black asphaltic material with sand mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD NAD K UWJ NAD NAD NAD SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT NAD SAT 13 of 14 Wildwood Elementary School PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. Federal Way Public Schools PBS Project #41519.003 PLM ASBESTOS SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Type Sample Location Lab Description Lab Result Lab Black asphaltic roofing Layer 2: Black asphaltic material NAD Brown insulation Layer 3: Black asphaltic material with fibrous NAD material Layer 4: Black asphaltic material NAD Layer 5: Black asphaltic material with fibrous NAD material Layer 6: Black asphaltic material with fibrous NAD material Layer 7: Brown fibrous material NAD 41519.003 -127 Vermiculite Gym Wall Layer 1: Tan/brown flaky material <1 Tremolite SAT 41519.003 -128 Vermiculite Gym Wall Layer 1: Tan/brown flaky material <1 Tremolite SAT 41519.003 -129 Vermiculite Gym Wall Layer 1: Tan/brown flaky material <1 Tremolite SAT mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 14 of 14 �1� it b6 G LABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY PBS V� •�dwwd IG�a Project Project: — Analysis requested: Date: Relinq'd by/Signature: /" Date/Tir►se-/'z924-i Received by/Signature: Date/Time: i.f L4. J' , E-mail results to: ❑1/ Brian Stanford ElPrudy Stoudt-McRae IV" Willem Mager ❑ Cel Alvarez ❑ Chuck Greeb ❑ Gregg Middaugh ❑ Janet Murphy ❑ Mike Smith ❑ Mark Hiley ❑ David Toy 0 Ferman Fletcher ❑ Tim Ogden ❑ Martin Estira [V Melissa Mearns TURN AROUND TIME: , ❑ 1 Hour { ! 24 Hours ❑ 3-5 Days ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 48 Hours © Other ❑ 4 Hours SAMPLE DATA FORM Sample # Material Location Lab rSl �i. 003 / 0(d) (ILf m0ov) —W. U/ad Crµl�ftk YtTA E0 J« - S.�t7. r.✓d,G>! .)&"Let oy-3 " FI �c C� �yt- A&C -2 fi -a-► t �.ru-Q-� AQ 54omq C.101) ' (•oar M � I ���e�1�K ft,�.0 �r,v►�1'e ����- CIa2� � C�l��, br,. d u rri char h 6, Clc�) h — �tO6 trit- UV. [Cft { � C8 Cif lik +i4— (M) — �1�^ Cw DW Xcd* VA 06-rr—&,�?t ►'yc ct Am mul V J V 2S17 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN ■ 966.727.0140 FAX ■ PBSUSA_COM PBS Z°ie ���LABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY, Project: A L M El i s� Project #:4-1 �I q, oO Analysis requested: _ V Lm Date: !- Z.,U 1 Relinq'd by/Signature- Received by/Signature: E-mail results to: ❑ Brian Stanford 0 Willem Mager ❑ Gregg Middaugh ❑ Mark Hiley ❑ Tim Ogden TURN AROUND TIME: ❑ 1 Hour ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 4 Hours ❑ Prudy Stoudt-McRae ❑ Cel Alvarez ❑ Janet Murphy ❑ David Toy ❑ Martin Estira V `4 Hours ❑ 48 Hours Date/Time: Date/Time: / ` `JJ ❑ Chuck Greeb ❑ Mike Smith ❑ erman Fletcher Melissa Mearns ❑ 3-5 Days ❑ Other SAMPLE DATA FORM Sample # Material Location Lab 44 41ca-21 1X1 UAW41tz C K ��r � i . cvr�irl a� '(. r6 ll I�ltitclakd bk� r� �. w✓✓��c✓ 1P.Kr� � C1r a-ft ill#o 112- « f-UW +aA r•� J; N W. Ctt cia ( 16 1 u v'�hc N. ►1 �2 `` -F W �c. ►aa- - 1 S� s�.� `" r�r►rn 1a.1� cY4 . 6,o ► . Aq &' If _ aro,�'" r�'t Q� r1 — Puro s L ( i)f V. blfic' - M4 G't 0"'4 to rz a - l ;,,,d 1.�1�I fr I l� 1-7 2 I'd� 1 n 1 �+ V,�. 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN = 866.727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory. 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disclaimer. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal government ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-931116 Attn.; Willem Mager client. PBS Engineering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Environmental, Seattle Jobs: 41519.003 Batch/: 201811666 Date Received: 7/2/2018 Samples Reed: 39 Date Analyzed: 7/3/2018 samples Analyzed: 39 Pro)ect I-- Wildwood ES Analyzed by. Reviewed by: Steve (Fanyao) Zhang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 1 41519.003-1 1 Tan/brown flaky None Vermiculite, Filler None detected material detected 1 Beige/white the None Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose detected Mineral rains 2 41519.003-2 None 2 Yellow/clear mastic Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose detected 1 Light blue/gray the None Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose 3 41519.003-3 detected Mineral rains 2 Yellow/clear mastic None Masticlbinder 3 Cellulose detected 1 Beige rubbery None Rubber/binder 2 Cellulose material detected 4 41519.003-4 None 2 Beige mastic detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 1 White the None Vinyl/binder, 3 Cellulose detected Mineral grains 5 41519.003-5 2 Yellow/clear mastic None Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose detected 3 Black mastic 2 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 1 Brown rubbery None Rubber/binder 2 Cellulose material detected 6 41519.003-6 2 Beigelbrown mastic None Mastic/binder, 2 Cellulose with paint detected Paint 1 Brown fibrous None Paint, Filler 65 Cellulose material with paint detected--j 7 41519.003-7 None 2 Brown mastic detected Masticlbinder 3 Cellulose 1 Brown fibrous None Paint, Filler 63 Cellulose material with aint detected 8 41519.003-8 None 2 Brown mastic Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose detected 1 Trace white None Filler, Binder 3 Cellulose powderymaterial detected 9 41519.003-9 2 White chalky None Binder/filler, 25 Cellulose, Glass material with paper detected Gypsum/binder fibers Gray fibrous None Paint, Filler, Pedite, Cellulose, Glass 10 41519.003-10 1 material with paint detected Glass beads 66 fibers 1 Yellow mastic None Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose detected 11 41519.003-11 Gray foamy None 2 Synthetic foam I None detected material detected 1 Tan paper with None Filler, 164 Cellulose black mastic detected Asphalt/binder 2 Silver foil None detected Foil/binder None detected 12 41519.003-12 3 Tan paper with None Filler, 70 Cellulose black mastic detected Asphalt/binder 1 of 4 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disclaimer. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal government. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-93/116 Attn.: Willem Mager Client: PBS Engineering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Environmental, Seattle JoW 41519.003 Batch* 201811666 Date Received: 7/2/2018 Samples Reed: 39 Date Analyzed: 7/3/2018 Samples Analyzed: 39 Project Loa: Wildwood ES Analyzed by. Cass H g Reviewed by. Steve (Fanyao) Zhang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 4 Yellow fibrous None Filler 90 Glass fibers material detected 1 Off-white brittle None Filler, Binder 2 Cellulose 13 41519.003-13 material detected 2 Yellow fibrous None Filler 89 Glass fibers material detected 14 41519.003-14 1 Red soft/elastic None Binder, Filler 4 Cellulose material detected 15 41519.003-15 1 Brown/gray soft 4 Chrysotile Filler, Binder 3 Cellulose material 1 Silver metal with None Metal, Paint 2 Cellulose 16 41519.003-16 paint detected 2 Brown fibrous None Filler, Paint 59 Cellulose material with paint detected 17 41519.003-17 1 Gray fibrous None Paint, Filler, Perlite, 62 Cellulose, Glass material with paint detected Glass beads fibers 1 Yellow mastic None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose detected 2 White tile 2 Chrysotile Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose 18 41519.003-18 Mineral gmains 3 Black mastic 3 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 4 Trace gray fibrous None Filler, Perlite, Glass 65 Cellulose, Glass material detected beads fibers White powdery 19 41519.003-19 1 material with 6 Chrysotile Binder/filier 35 Cellulose, Glass woven fibrous fibers material 1 Trace yellow None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose mastic detected 20 41519.003-20 2 White tile 2 Chrysotile Vinyl/binder, 4 Cellulose Mineral qrains 3 Black mastic 4 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 5 Cellulose 1 Brown fibrous None Paint, Filler 64 Cellulose 21 41519.003-21 material with Daint detected 2 Brown mastic None detected Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose White powdery 22 41519.003-22 1 material with 5 Chrysotile Binder/filler 35 Cellulose, Glass woven fibrous fibers material 1 Yellow/clear mastic None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose detected 23 41519.003-23 2 White tile 2 Chrysotile Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose Mineral 2rains 3 Black mastic 3 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 24 41519.003-24 1 Gray fibrous None Paint, Filler, Perlite 61 Cellulose, Glass material with paint detected fibers 2 of 4 SEA'CTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disdaimer. This report must not be used by the client Federal government. to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-93/116 Attn.: Willem Mager client.. PBS Engineering and Environmental, 5eatfle Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Job#: 41519.003 Batchfl: 201811666 Date Received: 7/2/2018 Samples Rec'd: 39 Date Analyzed: 7/3/21018 Samples Analyzed: tyzed: 39 Project lac.: Wildwood ES Analyzed by. Csssie H g Reviewed by: Steve Ifanyao ZZhang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 2 Brown mastic None detected Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose Gray/white 25 41519.003-25 1 sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, 2 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder, Paint Gray/white 26 41519.003-26 1 sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, 3 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder, Paint 1 Yellow mastic None detected Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 27 41519.003-27 2 Gray foamy None material detected Synthetic foam None detected 1 Yellow/clear mastic None detected Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 28 41519.003-28 2 White tile 2 Chrysotile Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose Mineral rains 3 Black mastic 4 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 5 Cellulose 1 Brown rubbery None 29 41519.003-29 material detected Rubber/binder 2 Cellulose 2 Beige mastic with None Mastic/binder, paint detected Paint 3 Cellulose 30 41519.003-30 1 Brown/gray soft material 4 Chrysotile Filler, Binder 4 Cellulose 1 Silver foil None detected Foil/binder El None detected 31 41519.003-31 2 Brown paper with mastic None detected Filler, Mastic/binder 69 III - Cellulose 3 Yellow fibrous None material detected Filler 90 Glass fibers 1 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 5 Cellulose 2 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 3 Black asphaltic material with None Asphalt/binder, Cellulose, Glass fibrous material detected Binder/filler 24 fibers 32 41519.003-32 4 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 5 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 26 Glass fibers 6 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 7 Brown fibrous None material detected Binder/filler 65 Cellulose Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, 33 41519.003-33 material with sand detected Sand 24 Glass fibers None 2 Black asphaltic material detected Asphalt/binder 2 Cellulose 3 of 4 Seattle Laboratory- 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Oisclaimar Tins report must not be used Federal Elovemolent by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-93/116 Attn.: Willem Mager Client-. PBS Enaineering and Environmental. Seattle Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Job#: 41519.003 sat": 201811666 Date Received: 7/2/2016 Samples Rec'd: 39 Date Analyzed: 7/3/2018 Samples Analyzed: 39 Project Loa: WildwoodES r Analyzed by. f�ssie g Reviewed by: Steve (Farryao) Zhang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 3 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 5 Cellulose 4 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 4 Cellulose Black asphaltic 5 material with None Asphalt/binder, 25 Cellulose, Glass fibrous material detected Binder/filler fibers 6 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 7 Brown fibrous None material detected Binder/filler 63 Cellulose 1 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 5 Cellulose Black asphaltic 2 material with None Asphalt/binder, 22 Cellulose, Glass fibrous material detected Binder/filler fibers 34 41519.003-34 3 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 4 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 23 Glass fibers Black asphaltic 5 material with None Asphalt/binder p 26 Cellulose, Glass fibrous material detected Binder/filler fibers 41519.003-35 material 1 White powdery 2Edetected Binder/filler 3 Cellulose 35 Composite 2 White chalky Binder/filler, result <1 % material with paper G sum/binder 25Cellulose Black asphaltic Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 4 Cellulose Black asphaltic 36 41519.003-36 2 material with None Asphalt/binder, 27 Cellulose, Glass fibrous material detected Binder/filler fibers 3 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 37 41519-003-37 1 Trace brown mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 2 Brown wood block None detected Wood aggregates 4 Cellulose 1 Off-white None soff/elastic material detected Binder, Filler 3 Cellulose 38 41519.003-38 2 Trace clear mastic None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose detected 3 Brown fibrous None material detected Binder/filler 65 Cellulose 39 41519.003-39 1 Gray fibrous None Paint, Filler, Periite, Cellulose, Glass material with aint detected Glass beads 65 fibers 4of4 PBSLABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY Project: Wiidwood Elements School Federal Wa School District Project #: 41519.003 Analysis requested: PLM Date: 7 D 7 7 18 Relinq'd by/5ignature: Date/Time: ��k l$VZ> Received by/Signature: Date/Time: —29�6� �Jl E-mail results to: ❑ Brian Stanford ❑ Willem Mager ❑ Cel Alvarez Janet Murphy ❑ Mike Smith ❑ Gregg Middaugh ❑ Kaitlin Soukup ❑ Ferman Fletcher ❑ Holl X Mark Hiley ❑ Martin Estira y Tuttle R ❑ Ryan ❑ Tim Ogden ElPrudy Justin Day Hunter f Cole Clark Stoudt-McRae Filmon Embaye TURN AROUND TIME: Ell Hour ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 24 Hours 3-5 Days s ❑ 4 Hours ❑ 48 Hours ❑ Other SAMPLE DATA FORM Sample # Material 41519.003 - 40 Tan sealant Location Lab Ext. stucco panel / North Elevation SAT 41519.003 - 41 Tan sealant Ext. stucco panel / West Elevation SAT 41519.003 - 42 Grey sealant Ext. window frame / West Elevation SAT 41519.003 - 43 Grey sealant Ext. window frame / North Elevation SAT 41519-003 - 44 Grey roof sealant Roof / Base of smoke stack 41519.003 - 45 Grey roof sealant Roof / Smoke stack penetration SAT 41519.003 - 46 Grey roof sealant Roof /Roof vent SAT 41519.003 - 47 Grey rood sealant Roof / Flashing SAT 41519.003 - 48 Built up roofing Roof / Above East/West hallway - SAT SAT 41519.003 - 49 Built up roofing south of entrance Roof / Above east hallway SAT 41519.003 - 50 Built up roofing of /covered walkway 41519.003 - 51 Vermiculite Gym ext. wall SAT 41519.003 - 52 Stucco Ext. North elevation — West side SAT AT 41519.003 - 53 Stucco Ext. North elevation — East side SAT 41519.003 - 54 Stucco Ext. Wall outside Rm 106 SAT 41519.003 - 55 Stucco Ext. Wall outside Rm 104 SAT 41519.003 - 56 Stucco Ext. West elevation —North side SAT 41519.003 - 57 Stucco Ext. North elevation — Center SAT 41519.003 - 58 Stucco Ext West elevation —South side SAT 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 96102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN 1 866.727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM dm,PBS LABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY SAMPLE DATA FORM Sample # Material 41519.003 - 59 HVAC Mechanical Isolation Cloth Location Lab On duct in Attic space above boiler SAT 41519.003 - 60 Duct insulation room On duct in Attic space above boiler SAT 41519.003 - 61 Brick and mortar room 41519,003 - 62 Fiberglass and black mastic Boiler room north wall SAT 41519.003 - 63 j Black speaker box mastic Unit ventilator- room 302 SAT 41519.003 - 64 Black undercoat Speaker box - Boiler room SAT 41519.003 - 65 Black undercoat Under steel sink - Room 178 SAT 41519.003 - 66 Black undercoat Under steel sink -Room 302 SAT Under drinking fountain - Hallway SAT 41519.003 - 67 12" ceiling the with fissures outside Room 108 41519.003 - 68 12" ceiling tile with brown mastic Office 126 SAT Hall outside Admin office SAT 41519.003 - 69 12" ceiling tile with brown mastic Kitchen 41519.003 - 70 12" ceiling tile with brown mastic East hallway SAT 41519.003 - 71 12" ceiling the with brown mastic Hall outside Room 203 SAT 41519.003 - 72 2'X4' ceiling the with fissures SAT 41519.003 - 73 2'X4' ceiling the with fissures Room 302 SAT 41519.003 - 74 2'X4' ceiling tile with small holes Room 136 SAT 41519.003 - 75 2'X4' ceiling the with small holes East hallway SAT 41519.003 - 76 Wall paper with mastic Hallway outside Room 307 SAT 41519.003 - 77 Composite Joint compound / GWB Room 149 (212) SAT 41519.003 - 78 Composite Joint compound / GWB Room 302 (139) SAT Attic space above boiler room SAT 41519.003 - 79 Composite Joint compound / GWB 41519.003 - 80 Composite Joint compound / GWB Room 201 (167) SAT Storage Room 136 SAT 41519.003 - 81 Counter laminate and mastic Room 134 41519.003 - 82 Counter laminate and mastic Teachers' lounge SAT 41519.003 - 83 Eirown covebase mastic Storage Room 136 SAT 41519.003 - 84 Off-white and brown covebase mastic Room 149 (212) SAT 41519.003 - 85 2" purple with speck ceramic tile Men's restroom outside boiler SAT 41519.003 - 86 2" purple ceramic curbing room INTe s restroom outside boiler SAT 41519.003 - 87 Beige ceramic tile, mastic and grout room On window sill / Room 107 SAT SAT 41519.003 - 88 Beige ceramic tile, mastic and grout On window sill /Room 302 SAT 41519.003 - 89 2" ceramic curbing with yellow and grey mastic Restroom 130 41519.003 - 90 2" ceramic curbing with yellow and grey mastic Restroom 135 SAT 41519.003 - 91 1" ceramic wall tile, grout, glue and GWB Room 201 (167) SAT SAT 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN • 866.727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM IU,; -Z, "PBS LABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY 41519.003 - 92 Carpet mastic Room 178 SAT 41519.003 - 93 Tan pebble pattern with blue and pink dot SVF Restroom floor associated with office SAT 41519.003 - 94 12" beige with grey streak VFT w/ Blk mastic Room 157 (206)cnne near sink (addition) 41519.003 - 95 12" beige with grey streak VFT w/ Blk mastic Room 132 (308) (addition) 41519.003 - 96 12" beige with brown streak VFT with yellow Room 179 (AV room) mastic / resid bl k u1 41519.003 - 97 a ac mastic 12" beige with brown streak VFT with yellow mastic / residual black mastic 41519.003 - 98 12 beige with brown streak VFT with yellow mastic / residual black mastic 41519.003 - 99 _ 12" beige with brown streak VFT with yellow _ mastic / residual black mastic 41519.003 - 100 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown streak VFT with black mastic 41519.003 - 101 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown streak VFT with black mastic 41519.003 -102 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown streak VFT with black mastic 41519.003 - 103 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown streak VFT with black mastic 41519.003 - 104 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown streak VFT with black mastic 41519.003 - 105 CPT mastic over 9" beige with brown streak VFT with black mastic 41519.003 - 106 Grey leveling compound over White leveling compound Over 9" beige with brown streak VFT with black mastic Room 167 (201) NW Room 124 (102) @ cpt/tile line near sink Room 103 Room 153 (208) SW West hallway outside Room 157 (206) Room 148 (211) NE East/West hallway @ West entrance Room 167 (201) NW Room 127 (403) North of double door entrance to center hallway SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT SAT 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100. SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN • 866.727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM SE.ATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 DYSCdaimer. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal governme nI. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-931116 Mr. Justin Day, Mr AM.: Mark Hiley, Ms_ client: PBS Engineering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Janet Murphy, Mr. Environmental, Seattle Cole Clark Job#: 41519.003 Batch#, 201812728 Date Recelved: 9/17/2018 Samples Redd: 67 Dete Analyzed: 9/20/2018 samples Analyzed: 67 Project Loc.: Wildwood Elementaty School/ Federal Way Schoot District Analyzed by. 59tSySOMjPC4ssle Huang Reviewed by: Steve• IE:nyan] ilr Drip, Pr�•;=i �•, is Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 1 41519.003-40 1 Tan soft/elastic material with paint None detected Binder, Filler, Paint 4 Cellulose 2 41519.003-41 1 Tan softlelastic material with paint None detected Binder, Filler, Paint 3 Cellulose 3 41519.003-42 1 Grey softlelastic material None d Binder, Filler 4 Cellulose 4 41519.003-43 1 Grey soft/elastic material "deed Binder, Filler 3 Cellulose 5 41519.003-44 1 Black asphaltic material with paint None detected Asphalt/binder, Paint 3 Cellulose 6 41519.003-45 1 Black asphaltic material with sand None detected Asphalt/binder, Sand 28 Cellulose 7 41519.003-46 1 Grey softlelastic material with paint None detected Binder, Filler, Paint 4 Cellulose 8 41519.003-47 1 Grey soft/elastic material None detected Binder, Filler 4 Cellulose 1 Black asphaltic material with sand None detected Asphalt/binder, Sand 26 Glass fibers 2 Black asphaltic material None detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 3 Black asphaltic material None detected Asphalt/binder 4 Cellulose 4 Black asphaltic material with sand None detected Asphalt/binder, Sand 27 Glass fibers 5 Black asphaltic fibrous material None detected Asphalt/binder, Binder/filler 71 Cellulose 9 41519.003 48 6 Black asphaltic material with sand None detected Asphalt/binder, Sand 27 Glass fibers 7 Black asphaltic fibrous material None detected Asphalt/binder, Binder/filler 71 Cellulose 8 Brown fibrous material None detected Binder, Filler 85 Cellulose 9 Black asphaltic material with sand None detected Asphalt/binder, Sand 27 Glass fibers 10 Black asphaltic material None detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 11 Black asphaltic material with sand None detected Asphaltlbinder, Sand 28 Glass fibers 1 Black asphaltic material with sand None detected Asphalt/binder, Sand 24 Glass fibers 10 41519.003-49 2 Black asphaltic material None detected As 4 Cellulose 3 Black asphaltic material None detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 4 Black asphaltic material with sand 1 None detected Asphalt/binder. Sand 25 Glass fibers 1 of 8 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9lh Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Discfalme' his report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Feder ; I aa.•e rnment. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-931116 Mr. Justin Day, Mr. Attn.: Mark Hiiey, Ms. client PBS E4neering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Janet Murphy, Mr. Environmental, Seattle Cole Clark Job#: 41519.003 Batch#: 201812728 Date Recetved: 9/17/2018 Samples Rec'd: 67 Data Analyzed;-9/20/2018 Samples Analyzed: 67 Project hoc: Wildwood Elementary School/ Federal Way School District Analyzed by: Rosy So Ca Reviewed by: Slova tFanMJ 7w "@, President Client Sample ID 41519.003-50 41519.003-51 Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % I Non -asbestos Fibers 5 Black asphaltic material None detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 6 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 27 Glass fibers 7 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 8 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, fibrous material detected Binder/filler 68 Cellulose 9 Brown fibrous None material detected Binder, Filler 88 Cellulose 10 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, fibrous material I detected Binder/filler 70 Cellulose 11 Black asphaltic material None detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 12 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, 26 Glass fibers material with sand detected Sand 1 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 27 Glass fibers 2 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 4 Cellulose 3 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 4 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 27 Glass fibers 5 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 6 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 29 Glass fibers 7 Black asphaltic None material detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 8 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 28 Glass fibers 9 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, fibrous material detected Binder/filler 73 Cellulose 10 Brown fibrous material None detected Binder, Filler 84 Cellulose 11 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, fibrous material detected Binder/filler 71 Cellulose 12 Black asphaltic material None detected Asphalt/binder 4 Cellulose 13 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 26 Glass fibers 14 Black asphaltic material None detected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 1 Tan/brown flaky material ¢1 Tremolite Vermiculite, Filler None detected 2 of 8 SEAITLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 9B105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747. NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disclaimer: This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal government. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-93/116 Mr. Justin Day, Mr. AM.: Mark Hiley, Ms. client: PBS Engineering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Janet Murphy, Mr. Environmental, Seattle Cole Clark Job#: 41519.003 Batch#: 201812728 Date Recelved: 9/17/2018 Samples Rec'd: 67 Date Analyzed: 9/20/2018 Samples Analyzed: 67 Project Loc.: Wildwood Elementary School/ Federal Way School District r Analyzed by Betsy assie g Reviewed by. Steve (Fanyao) 2hang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 13 41519.003-52 1 Gray sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, 3 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder, Paint 14 41519.003-53 1 Gray sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, 4 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder. Paint 15 41519.003-54 1 Gray sandylbrittle None Sand, Filler, 3 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder, Paint 16 41519.003-55 1 Gray sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, 4 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder, Paint 17 41519.003-56 1 Gray sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, 4 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder, Paint 18 41519.003-57 1 Gray sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, 3 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder, Paint 19 41519.003-58 1 Gray sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, 3 Cellulose material with paint detected Binder, Paint 20 41519.003-59 1 Gray fibrous None Filler, Fine particles 85 Cellulose material detected 1 Silver foil None Foil/binder None detected detected 21 41519.003-60 2 Gray soft material None Filler, Binder 3 Cellulose detected 3 Brown fibrous None Filler 90 Glass fibers material detected Gray/pink None 1 sandy/brittle detected Sand, Filler, Binder 3 Cellulose material with paint 22 41519.003-61 2 Tan sandy/brittle None Sand, Filler, Binder 3 Cellulose material detected 3 Trace black mastic None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose detected 1 Black fibrous None Filler 91 Glass fibers 23 41519.003-62 material detected 2 Black mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 24 41519.003-63 1 Black mastic None Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose detected 25 41519.003-64 1 Black soft/loose None Filler, Fine particles 5 Cellulose material detected 26 41519.003-65 1 Black soft/loose None Filler, Fine particles 3 Cellulose material detected 27 41519.003-66 1 Black soft/loose None Filler, Fine particles 4 Cellulose material detected 28 41519.003-67 1 white fibrous None Paint, Filler, Perite, 66 Cellulose, Glass material with paint detected Glass beads I fibers 29 41519.003-68 1 Gray fibrous material with trace None Paint, Filler, Perlite, 62 Cellulose, Glass paint detected Glass beads fibers 3 of 8 SEATTLE ASBEST0Q raQT Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Oisdaimer. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal government. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-931116 Mr. Justin Day, Mr. Attn: Mark Hiley, Ms. Client PBS Engineering and Janet Murphy, Mr. Environmental, Seattle Cole Clark Jeb#: 41519.003 eatchS: 201812728 Samples Rec'd: 67 Date Analyzed: 9/20/2018 ProjectLoc.: WlldwoodElementary School/ Federal Way School District Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Date Received: 9/17/2018 Samples Analyzed: 67 Analyzed by: Rout, Sens Cues ut Reviewed by: Steve (Fanyao) Zhang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 2 Brown mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 1 Gray fibrous material with trace None Paint, Filler, Perlite 63 Cellulose Glass 30 41519.003-69 paint detected Glass beads fibers 2 Brown mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 1 Gray fibrous material with trace None Paint, Filler, Perlite, 64 Cellulose, Glass 31 41519.003-70 paint detected Glass beads fibers _1 2 Trace brown mastic None detected None Mastic/binder Filler, Perlite, Glass 2 66 Cellulose Cellulose, Glass 1 Gray fibrous 32 41519.003-71 material detected beads fibers 2 Brown mastic None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose detected 33 41519.003-72 1 Gray fibrous None Paint, Filler, Perlite, 67 Cellulose, Glass material with paint detected Glass beads fibers 34 41519.003-73 1 Gray fibrous None Paint, Filler, Perlite, 68 Cellulose, Glass material with paint detected Glass beads fibers 35 41519.003-74 1 Gray fibrous None Paint, Filler, Perlite, 64 Cellulose, Glass material with paint detected Glass beads fibers 36 41519.003-75 1 Gray fibrous None Paint, Filler, Perlite, 69 Cellulose, Glass material with paint detected Glass beads fibers 1 Trace brown mastic None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose detected Off-white 37 41519.003-76 2 soft/elastic material with woven fibrous None detected Binder, Filler 20 Synthetic fibers material 3 Tan mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 1 Trace white None Binder/filler 4 Cellulose 38 41519.003-77 _ powdwy material detected 2 White chalky None Binder/filler, 24 Cellulose, Glass material with paper detected Gypsum/binder fibers 1 White powdery None 39 41519.003-78 material detected Binder/filler 5 Cellulose 2 White chalky None Binder/filler, 25 Cellulose, Glass material with paper detected Gypsum/binder fibers 1 White powdery None Binder/filler 3 Cellulose 40 41519.003-79 material detected 2 White chalky None Binder/filler, 22 Cellulose, Glass material with pa2er detected G psum/binder fibers 41 41519.003-80 1 White powdery material with paint None detected Binder/filler, Paint 4 Cellulose 4of8 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disclaimer. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal govemment. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-931116 Mr. Justin Day, Mr. Attu,: Mark Hiley, Ms. client: PBS Engineering and Janet Murphy, Mr_ Environmental, Seattle Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Cole Clark dew: 41519.003 Batchk 201812728 pate Racelved: 9/17/2018 Samples Redd: 67 Date Analyzed: 9/20/2018 Samples Analyzed: 67 Project Loc.: Wildwood Elementary School/ Federal Way School District Analyzed by. Betsy Song) sg aang Reviewed by. Steve (Fanyao) 7hang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 2 White chalky None) Binder/filler, 26 Cellulose material with paper detected Gypsum/binder 1 White/brown None Filler, Binder, Fine brittle/rigid material detected particles 65 Cellulose 42 41519.003-81 2 Red mastic None; Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose detected 3 Brown wood block None' detected Wood aggregates 4 Cellulose 1 light purple/brown None' Filler, Binder, Fine brittle/rigid material detected particles 63 Cellulose 43 41519,003-82 2 Red mastic I None'i detected Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 3 Brown wood block None'' detected Wood aggregates 4 Cellulose 44 41519.003-83 1 Brown mastic None, detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 1 Off-white mastic None'ected det detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 45 41519.003-84 2 Brown mastic None! Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose detected 1 Purple ceramic None, detected Ceramic/binder None detected 46 41519.003-85 2 Gray brittle/sandy None' Binder, Sand 2 Cellulose material detected 1 Purple ceramic None detected Ceramic/binder None detected 2 Trace beige mastic None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 47 41519.003-86 detected 3 Brown paper None detected Filler 75 Cellulose 4 Black soft/elasbc None Binder, Filler 4 Cellulose material detected 1 Beige ceramic None detected Ceramic/binder None detected 2 Gray brittle/sandy None material detected Binder, Sand 3 Cellulose 48 41519.003-87 3 White brittle None Filler, Binder 2 Cellulose material detected 4 Trace white mastic None detected Masbc/binder 2 Cellulose 1 Beige ceramic None Ceramic/binder None detected detected 49 41519.003-88 2 Gray brittle/sandy None Binder, Sand 4 j Cellulose material detected 3 White brittle material None detected Filler, Binder 2 Cellulose 5 of 8 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9lh Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 ❑izizE4tmcr: Thts repart must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NISI, or any agency of the Fec+e:al govemmeni ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA1600/R-931116 Mr. Justin Day, Mr. Attn.: Mark Hiley, Ms. client PBS Engineering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Janet Murphy, Mr. Environmental, Seattle Cole Clark Job#: 41519.003 Batch#: 201812728 Date Recelved: 9/1712018 Samples Rec•d: 67 Date Analyzed: 9/20/2018 samples Analyzed: 67 Project Loa: Wildwood Elementary School] Federal Way School District Analyzed by aetsy.Songt ; ,l¢ n9 Reviewed by. Sleve (Fanyao) ZZhang, Presldenl Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 4 Trace white mastic None detected Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 1 Beige ceramic None detected Ceramic/binder None detected 2 White brittle/sandy None Binder, Sand 4 Cellulose 50 41519.003-89 material detected 3 Trace yellow/gray None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose mastic detected 4 Brown paper None detected Filler 72 Cellulose 1 Beige ceramic None detected Ceramic/binder None detected 2 White brittle/sandy None material detected Binder, Sand 2 Cellulose 51 41519.003-90 3 Trace yellow/gray None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose mastic detected 4 Brown paper None Filler 74 Cellulose 1 detected Beige/off-white None Ceramic/binder None detected ceramic detected 2 White brittle/sandy None Binder, Sand 2 Cellulose 52 41519.003-91 material detected 3 Yellow mastic None detected Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 4 White chalky None Binder/filler, 25 Cellulose material with paper detected Gypsum/binder 1 Blue woven fibrous None material detected Filler, Binder 85 Synthetic fibers 2 Gray/clear mastic None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 53 41519.003-92 detected 3 Gray foamy material None detected Synthetic foam None detected 4 Gray brittle/sandy None Binder, Sand 4 Cellulose material detected 1 Tan sheet vinyl None detected Vinyl/binder None detected 54 41519.003-93 Gray fibrous 2 material with None Binder/filler, 65 Cellulose mastic detected Mastic/binder 1 Beige tile None Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose detected Mineral grains 2 Trace black mastic None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 55 41519.003-94 detected 3 Gray brittle/sandy None Binder, Sand 2 Cellulose material detected 56 41519.003-95 1 Beige tile g None Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose detected Mineral rains 6 of 8 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 91h Ave. NE, Suite 300. Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206,633.4747. NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disclaimer. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal government. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-931116 Mr. Justin Day, Mr. Atm: Mark Hiiey, Ms, client•. P$5 Engineering and Janet Murphy, Mr. Environmental. Seattle Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E_, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Cole Clark Job#* 41519.003 Batch#: 201812728 Date Received: 9/17/2018 Samples Reed: 67 Date Analyzed: 9/2012018 Samples Analyzed: 67 ProJectLoc.: Wildwood Elementary School/ Federal Way School District Analyzed by: Belly Sbnry a Fivan Reviewed by: Steve (Fanyao) Eh , Presidpnl Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Nan -asbestos Fibers 2 Black mastic 3 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 1 Beige the None Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose detected Mineral rains 57 41519.003-96 2 Yellow mastic None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose detected 3 Trace black mastic None detected Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 1 Beige tile None Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose detected Mineral grains 58 41519.003-97 2 Yellow mastic None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose detected 3 Trace black mastic 2 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 1 Beige tile None Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose detected Mineral rains 59 41519.003-98 2 Yellow mastic None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose detected 3 Trace black mastic 2 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 1 Beige tile None VinyUbinder, 2 Cellulose detected Mineral rains 60 41519.003-99 2 Yellow mastic None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose detected 3 Trace black mastic None detected Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 1 Yellow mastic None detected Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 61 41519.003-100 2 BeigeChrysotile tile 3 Ch sotile Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose Mineral grains 3 Black mastic 4 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 1 Yellow mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 62 41519.003-101 2 Beige the 3 Chrysotile ry Vinyl/binder, 3 Cellulose Mineral grains 3 Black mastic 4 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 1 Brown mastic None detected Mastic/binder 3 63 41519.003-102 2 Beige tile 2 Chrysotile Vinyl/binder, 4 FCellul�ose Mineral rains 3 Black mastic 4 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 5 Cellulose 4 Gray brittle/sandy None material detected Binder, Sand 2 Cellulose 1 Yellow mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 64 41519.003-103 2 Beige tile 3 Ch sotile ry Vinyl/binder, 2 Cellulose Mineral rains 3 Black mastic 3 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 7of8 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disclaimer. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal govemmenL ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA160G/R-93/116 Mr. Justin Day, Mr. Attn.; Mark Hiley, Ms. client. PBS Engineering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Janet Murphy, Mr. Environmental, Seattle Cole Clark Job#_ 41519.003 Batons: 201812728 Date Received: 9/17/2016 Samples Rec'd: 67 Date Analyzed: 9/2012018 Samples Analyzed: 67 Project Loc.: Wildwood Elementary School/ Federal Way School District Analyzed by. Belly SmW C to Ft Reviewed by Stave (Fanyao) Zhang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 1 Yellow mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 65 41519.003-104 2 Beige tile .3 Chrysotile Vinyl/binder, 3 Cellulose Mineral rains 3 Black mastic 4 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 4 Cellulose 1 Yellow mastic None Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose detected 66 41519.003-105 2 Beige tits 3 Chrysotile , Vinyl/binder 2 Cellulose Mineral grains 3 1 Black mastic 4 1 Chrysotile Mastic/binder 3 1 Cellulose 1 Gray brittle material None detected Filler, Binder 2 Cellulose 2 Yellow mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 3 White brittle None Filler, Binder 3 Cellulose 67 41519.003-106 material detected 4 Yellow mastic None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose detected 5 Beige tile None Vinyl/binder, 4 Cellulose detected I Mineral grains 6 Black mastic 4 Chrysotile I Mastic/binder 3 Cellulose 8 of 8 sAT Project: Analysis rrequested: P L /-n Reginq'd Received by/,6gnaturc: E-mail results to: ❑ Brian Stanford ❑ Willem Mager ❑ Gregg Middaugh Mark Hiley Tim Ogden TURM AROUND TIME: ❑ 1 Hour ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 4 Hours LABORAR TORY CHAMM OF CMS TODy Prudy Staudt -McRae ❑ Cel Alvarez Janet Murphy ❑ David Toy ❑ Martin Estira 12- bolt Pa•ru. 0 24 Hours ❑ 48 Hours Project #• y/ s/ 9, nvo D32e: Datelyii�e: ❑ Chuck Greeb ❑ Mike Smith ❑ Ferman Fletcher ❑ Melissa Mearns Days ❑ Other 2S17 EAST LAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 , 206.233.9639 MAIN 2 RFF 777 Wien [,v .. ­ SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 9th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax:206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code:201057-0 DiscWmer. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal gavemment Justin Day, Mark Attn.: Hiley, Janet Murphy, Cole Clark Job#: 41519,003 Samples Rec'd: 13 ProjectLoo.: Wildwood ES ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-93/116 Client: PBS Eng neering and Environmental, Seattle Batch#: 201812740 Date Analyzed: 9/20/2018 Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E_, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Date Received: 9/18/2018 Samples Analyzed: 13 Analyzed by: CaSa' H Reviewed by: Sieve {Fan}'3nj Itwttg, Preaidenl Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 1 Tan sheet vinyl None detected VinyVbinder None detected 1 107 Gray fibrous 2 material with None Binder/filler, 65 Cellulose mastic detected Mastic/binder 2 108 1 Gray soft/loose None Filler, Fine particles 5 Cellulose material detected 3 109 1 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, 70 Cellulose fibrous material detected Binder/filler 1 Yellow/clear mastic None detected Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 4 110 2 Brown wood block None detected Wood aggregates 4 Cellulose 5 111 1 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, 68 Cellulose fibrous material detected Binder/filler 1 Tan mastic None Mastic/binder 2 Cellulose 6 112 detected 2 Brown fibrous None Binder/filler 62 Cellulose material detected Gray fibrous 7 113 1 material with white None Paint, Filler, Perlite, 64 Cellulose, Glass paint detected Glass beads fibers 1 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, material with sand detected Sand 25 Glass fibers 2 Black asphal4sand None materialdetected Asphalt/binder 3 Cellulose 3 Black asphalNone Asphalt/binder, 8 114 material withdetected Sand 22 Glass fibers 4 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder _ 4 !Cellulose material detected 5 Clear plastic None detected Plastic None detected 6 Black asphaltic None Asphalt/binder, 69 Cellulose fibrous material detected Binder/filler 9 115 1 White sof lelastic None Binder, Filler 2 Cellulose material detected 10 116 1 White sofUelastic None Binder, Filler 3 Cellulose material detected 11 117 1 Whitelclear sofUelastic material None detected Binder, Filler _ 2 Cellulose 1 Gray fibrous None 12 material detected Filler, Fine particles 85 Cellulose 118 2 Blue plastic None I Plastic None detected detected 13 119 j 1 Black/dark brown None Binder, Filler 4 Cellulose - - I soft/elastic material detected 1 of 2 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 91h Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633,1111. Fax; 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disclaimac.. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certi fiification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal government Justin Day, Mark Attn.: Hiley, Janet Murphy, Cole Clark Job#: 41519.003 Samples Rec'd. 13 Project toe.: Wildwood ES Lab ID I Client Sample ID ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA1600/R-931116 Cilent PBS Engineering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Environmental, Seattle e-tchs: 201812740 Date Recetved: 9118/2018 Date Analyzed: 9/20/2018 samples Analyzed: 13 Analyzed by. CL Huang Reviewed by: Steve (Fany4o) Zhim President LaY� Description % Asbestos Fibers Nan -fibrous Components %�Cellul!Se� 2 Brown fibrous Nonener/filler, Paint 64 material with paint detected 2of2 �.PBS LABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY Project Analysis requested: L Relinq'd by/Signature: - Received by/Signature- E-mail results to: ❑ Brian Stanford ❑ Willem Mager ❑ Gregg Middaugh Mark Hiley Tim Ogden ❑ Prudy Stoudt-McRae ❑ Cel Alvarez C] Janet Murphy ❑ Kaitlin Soukup ❑ Martin Estira Justin Day Filmon Embaye Project #:5/ g• 6,*3 Date: /Zi /I i3 Date/Time: G% /2/ A& Date/Time: ° ❑ Mike Smith ❑ Ferman Fletcher ❑ Holly Tuttle ❑ Ryan Hunter ® Cole Clark TURN AROUND TIME: 3-5 Days ❑ 1 Hour El 24 Hours ❑ ❑ 48 Hours ❑ Other 2 Hours 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN • 866.727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST Seattle Laboratory: 4500 gth Ave. NE, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98105, Tel: 206.633.1111, Fax: 206.633.4747, NVLAP Lab Code: 201057-0 Disclaimer: This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by Seattle Asbestos Test, LLC, NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal government. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT PLM by Method EPA/600/R-93/116 Justin Day, Mark Atb: Hiley, Janet Murphy, Cole Clark Job#: 41519.003 Samples Reed: 5 ProjectLoc.: Wildwood ES Client: PBS Engineering and Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave. E., Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98102 Environmental, Seattle Bate": 201812787 Date Received: 9/21/2018 Date Analyzed: 9/24/2018 Samples Analyzed: 5 Analyzed by. Case ang Reviewed by: Steve (FanyaD) Zhang, President Lab ID Client Sample ID Layer Description % Asbestos Fibers Non -fibrous Components % Non -asbestos Fibers 1 120 1 White brittle None Filler, Binder 2 Cellulose material detected 2 121 1 White brittle None Filler, Binder 3 Cellulose material detected 3 122 1 White brittle None Filler, Binder 2 Cellulose material detected 4 123 1 White brittle None Filler, Binder 4 Cellulose material detected 5 124 1 White brittle None Filler, Binder 2 Cellulose material detected 1 of 1 APPENDIX B AA Lead Paint Chip Sampling Information AA Lead Paint Chip Sample Inventory AA Lead Paint Chip Laboratory Data Sheets AA Lead Paint Chip Chain of Custody Documentation Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools AA LEAD PAINT CHIP SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Paint Color / Component or Substrate 41509.003 -L01 White / Off-white / Wood / Exterior Trim 41509.003 -L02 Tan Off-white / Stucco / Exterior Wall 41509.003 -L03 Blue / Wood / Panel Wall 41509.003 -L04 Light Blue / Panel / Store Front Window 41509.003 -L05 Off-white / Brick Block / Wall 41509.003 -L06 Off-white / Brick Block / Wall 41509.003 -L07 Off-white / Wood Trim / Overhang 41509.003 -L08 Off-white Beige / Wood / Siding Sample Location Exterior - North Side at Room Exterior - North Side Wall by Gym Gym 100 -South Wall East Corridor by Gym Classroom 118 Exterior Classroom 157 Wall Exterior Overhand by Classroom 137 Portable 107 Exterior PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. PBS Project #41519.003 Results (mg/ka) Results (%) Lab <52 <0.0052 NVL 1400 0.140 NVL <55 <0.0055 NVL <91 <0.0091 NVL <70 <0.0070 NVL 2600 0.26 NVL 1500 0.15 NVL <51 <0.0051 NVL mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 < = Less than the Limit of Detection 1 of 1 July 3, 2018 Willem Mager PBS Environmental (Seattle) 2517 Eastlake Ave E, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98102 RE: Metals Analysis; NVL Batch # 1812474.00 Dear Mr. Mager, INVIL L A B S INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E S E R V I C E S Laboratory I Management I Training Enclosed please find the test results for samples submitted to our laboratory for analysis. Preparation of these samples was conducted following protocol outlined in EPA Method SW 846 -3051 unless stated otherwise. Analysis of these samples was performed using analytical instruments in accordance with U.S. EPA, NIOSH, OSHA and other ASTM methods. For matrix materials submitted as paint, dust wipe, soil or TCLP samples, analysis for the presence of total metals is conducted using published U.S. EPA Methods. Paint and soil results are usually expressed in mg/Kg which is equivalent to parts per million (ppm). Lead (Pb) in paint is usually expressed in mg/Kg (ppm) , Percent (%) or mg/cm2 by area. Dust wipe sample results are usually expressed in ug/wipe and ug/ft2. TCLP samples are reported in mg/L (ppm). For air filter samples, analyses are conducted using NIOSH and OSHA Methods. Results are expressed in ug/filter and ug/m3. Other matrix materials are analyzed accordingly using published methods or specified by client. The reported test results pertain only to items tested and are not blank corrected. For recent regulation updates pertaining to current regulatory levels or permissible exposure levels, please call your local regulatory agencies for more details. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. if you need further assistance please feel free to call us at 206-547-0100 or 1-888-NVLLABS. Sincerely, Shalini Patel, Laboratory Analyst ,k11i111" AiHA LAP, LLC ApCRE�RE0iA80RA�ORY 1.888.NVL.LABS NVL Laboratories, Inc. 1.888.(685.5227) '• T1 '� Irr�rrin�'ti�� 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 www.nvllabs.com B#101861 LpBt618fi1 206.547.0100 f 206.634.1936 P � page 1 of 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p206.547.0100 1 f206.634.1936 I www.nvllabs.com Analysis Report Total Lead (Pb) iwvu. L A B S Client: PBS Environmental (Seattle) Batch #: 1812474.00 Address: 2517 Eastlake Ave E, Suite 100 Matrix: Paint Seattle, WA 98102 Method: EPA 3051/7000B Client Project #: 41519.003 Attention: Mr. Willem Mager Date Received: 7/2/2018 Project Location: Wildwood E.S. Samples Received: 8 Samples Analyzed: 8 Sample RL in Results Results in Lab ID Client Sample # Weight (g) mg/Kg in mg/Kg percent 18064819 41519.003-1-01 0.1931 52 < 52 <0.0052 18064820 41519.003-1-02 0.1936 52 1400 0.14 18064821 41519.003-1-03 0.1820 55 < 55 <0.0055 18064822 41519.003-1-04 0.1093 91 < 91 <0.0091 18064823 41519.003-1-05 0.1426 70 < 70 <0.0070 18064824 41519.003-1-06 0.1911 52 2600 0.26 18064825 41519.003-1-07 0.1924 52 1500 0.15 18064826 41519.003-1-08 0.1950 51 < 51 < 0.0051 Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Yasuyuki Hida Date Analyzed: 07/03/2018 Reviewed by: Shalini Patel Date Issued: 07/03/2018 Shalini Patel, Laboratory Analyst mg/ Kg =Milligrams per kilogram RL = Reporting Limit Percent = Milligrams per kilogram / 10000 '<' = Below the reporting Limit Note: Method QC results are acceptable unless stated otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, the condition of all samples was acceptable at time of receipt. Bench Run No: 2018-0703-3 page 2 of 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. LEAD LABORATORY SERVICES 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 1 www.nvilabs.com Company PBS Environmental _(Seattle) _ Address 2517_EastlakeAve E,_Suite 100 Seattle, WA_98102 Project Manager Mr. -Willem- Mager Phone (206_)_233-9.639__ office: (8.00_) 628.-96.39 NVL Batch Number 1812474.00 TAT 1 _Day AH No Rush TAT Due Date 7/3/2018 Time 2:15 PM Email willem.mager@pbsusa.com Fax (866_) 727-0140 Project Name/Number: 41519.003 Project Location: Wildwood E.S. Subcategory Flame AA (FAA)_ Item Code FAA-02 EPA 7000B Lead by FAA <paint> Total Number of Samples Lab ID Sample ID Description Rush Samples A/R 1 18064819 41519.003-1-01 A 2 18064820 41519.003-1-02 A 3 18064821 41519.003-1-03 A 4 18064822 41519.003-1-04 A 5 18064823 41519.003-1-05 A 6 18064824 41519.003-1-06 A 7 18064825 41519.003-1-07 A 8 18064826 41519.003-1-08 A Print Name Signature Company Date i ime Sampled by Client Relinquished by Client Office Use Oniv Print Name Slgnature Company Date Time Received by Soumeya Benzina NVL 7/2/18 1415 Analyzed by Yasuyuki Hida NVL 7/3/18 Results Called by ❑ Faxed ❑ Emailed Special Instructions: Date: 7/2/2018 Time: 2:19 PM Entered By: Emily Schubert page 3 of 4 . �W� PBS LABORATORY CH, 1812474 Project: wild Wma Gr S. Analysis requested: Relinq'd by/Signature: JU ./_41 Received by/Signature: ' V ✓ L E-mail results to: [I Brian Stanford ❑ Prudy Stoudt-McRae O"A"illem Mager ❑ Cel Alvarez ❑ Gregg Middaugh ❑ Janet Murphy ❑ Mark Hiley ❑ David Toy ❑ Tim Ogden ❑ Martin Estira TURN AROUND TIME: ❑ 1 Hour 24 Hours ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 48 Hours ❑ 4 Hours Project 4l9-lq•oa3 Date: 7- 2 — 10 Date/Time:?. 16 Date/Ti me: r4lS ❑ Chuck Greeb ❑ Mike Smith ❑ Ferman Fletcher Melissa Mearns ❑ 3-5 Days ❑ Other SAMPLE DATA FORM Sample # Material Location Lab o[. on -A � r `UG P i` -Mn4 H wy I, f r — y A4 Y 3-l.0 . stunwV NA 4ArI Qr u -LD WSJ �'V4 I Zq r.r f r ✓i d 6 sx LO S dy- -41-A 0 lac.I,c wll A. L e W0 0v ) i f u4/L�✓% d raM 13 wuv� 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233,9639 MAIN • 866.727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM page 4 of 4 APPENDIX C Bulk PCB Sampling Information Bulk PCB Laboratory Data Sheets Bulk PCB Chain of Custody Documentation Wildwood Elementary School PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. Federal Way Public Schools PBS Project #41519.003 PCB SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Sample Location Analyte Lab Result (mg/ka) Lab 41519.003 -13-01 Door sealant brown Exterior exit door of boiler room 105 Aroclor - 1016 < 5.7 NVL Aroclor - 1221 < 5.7 Aroclor - 1232 < 5.7 Aroclor - 1242 < 5.7 Aroclor - 1248 < 5.7 Aroclor - 1254 < 5.7 Aroclor - 1260 < 5.7 Total PCBs < 5.7 41519.003 -13-02 Door sealant brown Exterior exit door of classroom 157 + steel post Aroclor -1016 < 6.0 NVL Aroclor - 1221 < 6.0 Aroclor - 1232 < 6.0 Aroclor - 1242 < 6.0 Aroclor - 1248 < 6.0 Aroclor - 1254 < 6.0 Aroclor - 1260 8 Total PCBs 8 41519.003 -PCB2 Sealant on stucco panel North side room 203/162 Aroclor 1016 ND Aroclor 1221 ND Aroclor 1232 ND Aroclor 1242 ND Aroclor 1248 ND Aroclor 1254 ND Aroclor 1260 ND Aroclor 1262 ND Aroclor 1268 ND mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 ND and < = Less than the Limit of Detection 1 of 2 Wildwood Elementary School PBS Engineering and Environmental Inc. Federal Way Public Schools PBS Project #41519.003 PCB SAMPLE INVENTORY PBS Sample # Material Sample Location Analyte Lab Result (malka) Lab Total PCBs ND 41519.003 -PCB3 Sealant on roof flashing Over boiler room Aroclor 1016 ND Aroclor 1221 ND Aroclor 1232 ND Aroclor 1242 ND Aroclor 1248 ND Aroclor 1254 ND Aroclor 1260 ND Aroclor 1262 ND Aroclor 1268 ND Total PCBs ND 41519.003 -PCB4 Sealant on window frames North side room 201/167 Aroclor 1016 ND Aroclor 1221 ND Aroclor 1232 ND Aroclor 1242 ND Aroclor 1248 ND Aroclor 1254 ND Aroclor 1260 ND Aroclor 1262 ND Aroclor 1268 ND Total PCBs ND mg/kg = Milligrams per kilogram April 2, 2019 ND and < = Less than the Limit of Detection 2 of 2 July 5, 2018 Mr. Willem Mager PBS Environmental 2517 Eastlake Avenue E, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98102 Re: NVL Batch 1812475.00 Project Name/Number: 41519.003 Project location: Wildwood E.S. Fed. Way Dear Mr. Maqer. "-40 INAVVIL L A B 5 INDUSTRIAL H Y G I E N E S E R V I C E S Laboratory I Management I Training Enclosed please find test results for samples submitted to our laboratory for analysis. Preparation and analysis of these samples were conducted in accordance with published industry standards and methods specified on the attached analytic report. The content of this package consists of the following: -Case Narrative & Definition of Data Qualifiers -Analytical Test Results -Applicable QC Summary -Client Chain -of -Custody (CoC) -NVL Receiving Record The report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client will be discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. If you need further assistance, please contact us at 206-547-0100 or 1-888-NVLLABS. Sincerely, .2&� Nick Ly, Technical Director Enclosure: Sample Results Phone: 206.547.0100 1 Fax: 206.634.1936 1 Toll Free: 1.888.NVL.LABS (685.5227) Page 1 of 10 4708 Aurora Avenue North I Seattle, WA 98103 1N�VILILw L A B S Case Narrative: The following summarizes samples received on date as shown on the accompanied Chain of custody by NVL Laboratories, Inc. from PBS Environmental for Project Number: 41519.003. Samples were logged in for PCB analysis per client request using both customer sample ID's and laboratory assigned ID's as listed on the Chain -of -Custody (CoC). All samples as received were processed and analyzed within specified turnaround time without any abnormalities and deviations that may affect the analytical results. All quality control requirements were acceptable unless stated otherwise. The conditions of all samples were acceptable at time of receipt and all samples submitted with this batch were analyzed unless stated otherwise on the CoC. Test Results are reported based on dry weight in micrograms per kilograms (mg/kg) for PCB samples as shown on the analytical reports. Page 2 of 10 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 1 www.nAlabs.com Terms % Rec B DF J A J2 J3 J4 LCS LFS INS IL L A B S Definition Appendix Percent recovery. Below Reporting Limit(RL) or Limit of Quantitation(LoQ) of the instrument. Blank contamination. The recorded results is associated with a contaminated blank. Dilution Factor The reported concentration is an estimated value because something may be present in the sample that interfered with the analysis. The reported concentration is an estimated value because the laboratory control sample (LCS) is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimated value because the percent recovery for matrix spike is out of control limits. The reported concentration is an estimated value because the relative percent difference(RPD) for duplicate analysis is out of control limits. Percent recovery is outside of established control limits. Laboratory Control Sample. Laboratory Fortified Spike Limits The upper and lower control limits for spike recoveries. LN Quality control sample is outside of control limits. This analyte was not detected in the sample. LOQ Limit of quantitation( same as RL) mg/kg Milligrams per kilogram. ND Analyte not detected or below the reporting limit of the instrument or methodology Page 3 of 10 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 1 www.nvllabs.com Terms PPM Definition Appendix Parts per Million. INV IL L A B 5 QC Batch Group Quality Control Batch Group. The entity that links analytical results and supporting quality control results. R The data are not reliable due to possible contamination or loss of material during preparation or analysis. Re -sampling and reanalysis are necessary for verification. RL Reporting Limit. The minimum concentration that can be quantified under routine operating conditions. RPD Relative Percent Difference. The relative difference between duplicate results( matrix spike, blank spike, or samples duplicate) expressed as a percentage. RPD Limit The maximum RPD allowed for a set of duplicate measurements(see RPD). SMI Surrogate has matrix interference. Spike Conc. The measured concentration, in sample basis units, of a spiked sample. SURR-ND Surrogate was not detected due to matrix interference or dilution. ug/m3 Micrograms per cubic meter. ug/mL Micrograms per milliliter mg/Kg milligram per kilogram Page 4 of 10 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4706 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 96103 p206.547.0100 1 f206.634.1936 lwww.nvllabs.com ANALYSIS REPORT Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Gas Chromatography Client PBS Environmental SDG Number 1812475.00 Date Reported 07/05/2018 Project Number 41519.003 Location Wildwood E.S. Fed. Way IN L A B 5 Samples Received* 2 Analyzed By Aaron Brown Samples Analyzed* 2 Analysis Method 8082A Preparation Method 3546PR (PCB) for this test only Sample Number 41519.003-13-01 Received 07/02/2018 Lab Sample ID 18064827 Matrix Material Initial Sample Size 0.3487 gm Units of Result mg/Kg, as received Aroclor-1016 5.7 < 5.7 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1221 5.7 < 5.7 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1232 5.7 < 5.7 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1242 5.7 < 5.7 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1248 5.7 < 5.7 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1254 5.7 < 5.7 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1260 5.7 < 5.7 07/02/2018 PCBs, Total 5.7 <5.7 Comments: Reporting limit raised due to small sample size Sample Number 41519.003-P-02 Received 07/02/2018 Lab Sample ID 18064828 Matrix Material Initial Sample Size 0.3315 gm Units of Result mg/Kg, as received Final Result Analysis Date Aroclor-1016 6.0 < 6.0 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1221 6.0 < 6.0 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1232 6.0 < 6.0 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1242 6.0 < 6.0 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1248 6.0 < 6.0 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1254 6.0 < 6.0 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1260 6.0 8 07/02/2018 PCBs, Total 6.0 8 Comments: Reporting limit raised due to small sample size Page 5 of 10 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4706 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 96103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 j www.nvllabs.com Quality Control Results QC Batch(es): 0773 Analysis Method: QC Batch Method: 3546PR (PCB) Analysis Description: Preparation Date: 07/02/2018 Blank: MBLK-1812475 Blank RL Analyte Result Units DF Aroclor-1016 ND mg/Kg 1 1.0 Aroclor-1221 ND mg/Kg 1 1.0 Aroclor-1232 ND mg/Kg 1 1.0 Aroclor-1242 ND mg/Kg 1 1.0 Aroclor-1248 ND mg/Kg 1 1.0 Aroclor-1254 ND mg/Kg 1 1.0 Aroclor-1260 ND mg/Kg 1 1.0 PCBs, Total ND mg/Kg 1 1.0 Surrogates: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 1 Decachlorobiphenyl 1 Lab Control Sample: LCS-1254-1812475 Blank Spike Spike Analyte Result Units DF Conc. Aroclor-1254 18.3 mg/Kg 1 20.0 Surrogates: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 1 Decachlorobiphenyl 1 Lab Control Sample: LCS-1016-1260-1812475 Lab Control Sample Duplicate: LCS Dup-1812475 Blank Spike Spike Analyte Result Units DF Conc. Aroclor-1016 16.7 mg/Kg 1 20.0 21.7 20.0 Aroclor-1260 18.8 mg/Kg 1 20.0 25 20.0 Surrogates: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 1 Decachlorobiphenyl 1 J L A 8 S 8082A Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Gas Chromatography Control Limit 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 % Rec 62 40-140 75 40-140 % Rec % Rec Limits 92 40-140 92 40-140 113 40-140 Qualifiers Qualifiers % Rec Limits RPD RPD Limit Qualifiers 83 40-140 108 40-140 26 50 94 40-140 125 40-140 28 50 79 40-140 89 40-140 94 40-140 113 40-140 Page 6 of 10 NVL Laboratories, Inc. ■■ 4706 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 96103 I �11 p 206,547,0100 1 f 206.634.1936 1 www.nvllabs.com L A 8 5 Surrogate Recovery Summary Report Client PBS Environmental SDG Number 1812475 Project 41519.003 Customer Sample ID Lab Sample ID Analyte Recovery Limits 41519.003-P-01 18064827 Decachlorobiphenyl 55% 40-140 41519.003-P-01 18064827 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 41 % 40-140 41519.003-P-02 18064828 Decachlorobiphenyl 96% 40-140 41519.003-P-02 18064828 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 66% 40-140 LCS Dup-1812475 LCS Dup-1812475 Decachlorobiphenyl 113% 40-140 LCS Dup-1812475 LCS Dup-1812475 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 89% 40-140 LCS-1016-1260-1812475 LCS-1016-1260-1812475 Decachlorobiphenyl 94% 40-140 LCS-1016-1260-1812475 LCS-1016-1260-1812475 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 79% 40-140 LCS-1254-1812475 LCS-1254-1812475 Decachlorobiphenyl 113% 40-140 LCS-1254-1812475 LCS-1254-1812475 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 92% 40-140 MBLK-1812475 MBLK-1812475 Decachlorobiphenyl 75% 40-140 MBLK-1812475 MBLK-1812475 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 62% 40-140 * Recovery outside limits Page 7 of 10 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave N, Seattle, WA 98103 p 206.547.0100 1 f 206.634.1936 l www.nvllabs.com NITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATI N VERIFICATION SDG No: 1812475 Determination: 8082 PCB Aroclors <Material> Contract: INVILa L A B S Run Sample Source Analyzed Analyte True Found Unit % Rec Limits R000766 CCV1-1016- 1260 PCB_2017-1-2 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1016 5 5 ug/mL 100 80-120 PCB 2017-1-2 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1260 5 5 ug/mL 100 80-120 CCV1-1254 PCB 2017-1-3 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1254 5 1 5 ug/mL 100 80-120 ICV 1016-1254- 1260 PCB_2017-1-4 07/02/2018 Arocor-1016 5 5.619 ug/mL 112 85-115 PCB 2017-1-4 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1254 5 5.623 ug/mL 112 85-115 PCB 2017-1-4 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1260 5 5.63 ug/mL 113 85-115 CCV2-1016- 1260 PCB_2017-1-2 07/02/2018 Arocor--1016 5 5.807 ug/mL 116 80-120 PCB 2017-1-2 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1260 5 5.901 ug/mL 118 80-120 CCV2-1254 PCB 2017-1-3 07/02/2018 Aroclor-1254 5 5.965 ug/mL 119 80-120 % Rec = Percent recovery * = Percent recovery not within control limits FORM PAS-RSR-1.1 Date Printed: 7/5/2018 11:53 Page 1 of 1 Page 8 of 10 ORGANICS LABORATORY SERVICES Company P_BS_Erwir_onmental .(Se_attle) ._ Address 25.17_Eastlake Ave E, Suite 100__ Seattle, WA 98102 Project Manager Mr_Willer_Mager_____ Phone (206) 233-9639 Office: (_800) 628-9639 NVL Batch Number 181.2475.00 _ TAT 3 Daus_.__ _ AH.. No Rush TAT Due Date 7/61201.8 _. Time 2_:1.5_PM Email will.em.mager@p.bsusa,com Fax (866)727-0.140. Project Name/Number: 41.519 003 Project Location: Wildwo.od.E.S.. Fed. Way . Subcategory Quantitative analysis Item Code ORG-05 Method 8082 PCB Aroc(ors <Bulk> N )� IL _ L A B S Total Number of Samples _2 _ Rush Samples Lab ID Sample ID Description AIR _1 118064827 41519.003-P-01 A 2 18064828 '41519.003-P-02 ^� A Print Name Signature. Comte Date Time Sampled by Client Relinquished by JClient Office Use Only Print Name Signature Company Date Time Received by Soumeya Benzina _ NVL 7/2/18 1415 _ Analyzed by %r a INVL 7 z 17 : 00 Results Called by ❑ Faxed ❑ Emailed Special Instructions: Entered By: Emily Schubert Date. 7/2/2018 Time: 2:28 PM 1 of 1 Page9of 10 4708 Aurora Ave North, Seattle. VVA 98103 I o 206 547,0100 1 f 206 634 1936 1 wv w nvllabs com PBS Project: Analysis Relinq'd Received E-mail results to: LABORATORY 1812475 Stanford ❑ Prudy Stoudt-McRae V❑ Willem (Willem Mager ❑ Cel Alvarez ❑ Gregg Middaugh ❑ Janet Murphy ❑ Mark Hiley ❑ David Toy ❑ Tim Ogden ❑ Mart' .i Estira I f e TURN AROUND TIME: ❑ 1 Hour ❑ 24 Hours ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 48 Hours ❑ 4 Hours Project #• "f V 3� Date- r b ,c�J Date/Time: . 2 �i %fb ( / r115' Date/Time: 1-7 ly if ❑ Chuck Greeb ❑ Mike Smith ❑ rman Fletcher Melissa Mearns �UL 77.114 19:00 *Ve3-!5 Days 43&119 ❑ Other rDf r 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 • 206.233.9639 MAIN • 866.727.0140 FAX • PBSUSA.COM Page 10 of 10 Fremont �r,7071MM` 3600 Fremont Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98103 T. (206) 352-3790 F: (206) 352-7178 inro@fremontanalytical.com PBS Engineering & Environmental Mark Hiley 2517 Eastlake Ave, E #100 Seattle, WA 98102 RE: Wildwood ES Work Order Number: 1809255 September 24, 2018 Attention Mark Hiley: Fremont Analytical, Inc. received 3 sample(s) on 9/17/2018 for the analyses presented in the following report. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) by EPA 8082 This report consists of the following: - Case Narrative - Analytical Results - Applicable Quality Control Summary Reports - Chain of Custody All analyses were performed consistent with the Quality Assurance program of Fremont Analytical, Inc. Please contact the laboratory if you should have any questions about the results. Thank you for using Fremont Analytical. Sincerely, CC: Chelsea Ward Janet Murphy Project Manager DOD/ELAP Certification AL17-135, ISOAEC 17025.2005 ORELAP Cen9fication: WA 100009-007 (NELAP Recognized) Original www.fremontanalytical.com Page 1 of 11 rlFmmont iiT►'7MMAMA CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood ES Work Order: 1809255 Lab Sample ID 1809255-001 1809255-002 1809255-003 Client Sample ID PCB2 PCB3 PCB4 Date: 0912412018 Work Order Sample Summary Daterrime Collected 08/31 /2018 12:00 AM 08/31 /2018 12:00 AM 08/31 /2018 12:00 AM Date/Time Received 09/17/2018 3:00 PM 09/17/2018 3:00 PM 09/17/2018 3:00 PM Original Note: If no "Time Collected" is supplied, a default of 12:OOAM is assigned Page 2 of 11 FlFremont CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood ES I. SAMPLE RECEIPT: Samples receipt information is recorded on the attached Sample Receipt Checklist. Case Narrative W O#: 1809255 Date: 9/24/2018 II. GENERAL REPORTING COMMENTS: Results are reported on a wet weight basis unless dry -weight correction is denoted in the units field on the analytical report ("mg/kg-dry" or "ug/kg-dry"). Matrix Spike (MS) and MS Duplicate (MSD) samples are tested from an analytical batch of "like" matrix to check for possible matrix effect. The MS and MSD will provide site specific matrix data only for those samples which are spiked by the laboratory. The sample chosen for spike purposes may or may not have been a sample submitted in this sample delivery group. The validity of the analytical procedures for which data is reported in this analytical report is determined by the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and the Method Blank (MB). The LCS and the MB are processed with the samples and the MS/MSD to ensure method criteria are achieved throughout the entire analytical process. III. ANALYSES AND EXCEPTIONS: Exceptions associated with this report will be footnoted in the analytical results page(s) or the quality control summary page(s) and/or noted below. Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-PCB-S), SAMPLE (1809255-001A) required Acid Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3665A). Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-PCB-S), SAMPLE (1809255-002A) required Acid Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3665A). Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-PCB-S), SAMPLE (1809255-003A) required Acid Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3665A). Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-PCB-S), SAMPLE (1809255-001A) required Florisil Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3620C). Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-PCB-S), SAMPLE (1809255-002A) required Florisil Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3620C). Prep Comments for METHOD (PREP-PCB-S), SAMPLE (1809255-003A) required Florisil Cleanup Procedure (Using Method No 3620C). Original Page 3 of 11 Fremont i'iii/19-OriTiU Qualifiers: Qualifiers & Acronyms W O#: 1809255 Date Reported: 9/24/2018 * - Flagged value is not within established control limits B - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank D - Dilution was required E - Value above quantitation range H - Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded I - Analyte with an internal standard that does not meet established acceptance criteria J - Analyte detected below Reporting Limit N - Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC) Q - Analyte with an initial or continuing calibration that does not meet established acceptance criteria (<20%RSD, <20% Drift or minimum RRF) S - Spike recovery outside accepted recovery limits ND - Not detected at the Reporting Limit R - High relative percent difference observed Acronyms: %Rec - Percent Recovery CCB - Continued Calibration Blank CCV - Continued Calibration Verification DF - Dilution Factor HEM - Hexane Extractable Material ICV - Initial Calibration Verification LCS/LCSD - Laboratory Control Sample / Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate MB or MBLANK - Method Blank MDL - Method Detection Limit MS/MSD - Matrix Spike / Matrix Spike Duplicate PDS - Post Digestion Spike Ref Val - Reference Value RL - Reporting Limit RPD - Relative Percent Difference SD - Serial Dilution SGT - Silica Gel Treatment SPK - Spike Surr - Surrogate Original www.fremontanalytical.com Page 4 of 11 llti. Fremont �:r inr��l �-- � s � Analytical Report Work Order: 1809255 Date Reported: 9/24/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/31/2018 Project: Wildwood ES Lab ID: 1809255-001 Matrix: Solid Client Sample ID: PC132 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Polychlorinated Bipilenyls (PCB) by EPA 8082 Batch ID: 22012 Analyst: SB Aroclor 1016 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/201810:04:41 PM Aroclor 1221 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Aroclor 1232 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Aroclor 1242 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Aroclor 1248 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Aroclor 1254 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Aroclor 1260 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Aroclor 1262 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Aroclor 1268 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Total PCBs ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 133 30.8 - 168 %Rec 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Surr: Tetrachloro-m-4ene 111 30.3 - 157 %Rec 1 9/20/2018 10:04:41 PM Original Page 5 of 11 ytrr R�',�iri►z Fremont f - - -- - — _ - Analytical Report Work Order: 1809255 Date Reported: 9/24/2018 Client: PBS Engineering & Environmental Collection Date: 8/31/2018 Project: Wildwood ES Lab ID: 1809255-002 Matrix: Solid Client Sample ID: PCB3 Analyses Result RL 4ual Units DF Date Analyzed Polychlorinated Bi hen Is PCB by EPA 8082 Batch ID: 22012 Analyst: SB Aroclor 1016 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Aroclor 1221 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Aroclor 1232 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Aroclor 1242 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Aroclor 1248 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Aroclor 1254 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Aroclor 1260 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Aroclor 1262 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Aroclor 1268 ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Total PCBs ND 0.980 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 110 30.8 - 168 %Rec 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Sun-: Tetrachloro-m-4ene 110 30.3 - 157 %Rec 1 9/20/2018 10:15:50 PM Original Page 6 of 11 Fremont �,1►�*Sri 1, � �., A1f� rM1 0 irw ►rWii iJ■ Analytical Report Work Order: 1809255 Date Reported: 9/24/2018 Client: PBS Engineering $ Environmental Collection Date: 8/31/2018 Project: Wildwood ES Lab ID: 1809255-003 Matrix: Solid Client Sample ID: PC134 Analyses Result RL Qual Units DF Date Analyzed Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) by EPA 8082 Batch ID: 22012 Analyst: SB Aroclor 1016 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Aroclor 1221 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Aroclor 1232 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Aroclor 1242 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Aroclor 1248 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Aroclor 1254 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Aroclor 1260 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Aroclor 1262 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Aroclor 1268 ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Total PCBs ND 1.00 mg/Kg 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Sum Decachlorobiphenyl 113 30.8 - 168 %Rec 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Surr: Tetrachloro-m-4ene 109 30.3 - 157 %Rec 1 9/20/2018 10:26:59 PM Original Page 7 of 11 Fremont Work Order: 1809255 CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood ES Date: 9/24/2018 QC SUMMARY REPORT Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) by EPA 8082 Sample ID MB-22012 SampType: MBLK Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/20/2018 RunNo: 46383 Client ID: MBLKS Batch ID: 22012 Analysis Date: 9/20/2018 SegNo: 900495 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Aroclor 1016 ND 0.100 Aroclor 1221 ND 0.100 Aroclor 1232 ND 0.100 Aroclor 1242 ND 0.100 Aroclor 1248 ND 0.100 Aroclor 1254 ND 0.100 Aroclor 1260 ND 0.100 Aroclor 1262 ND 0.100 Aroclor 1268 ND 0.100 Total PCBs ND 0.100 Sun-: Decachlorobiphenyl 55.7 50.00 111 30.8 168 Sum Tetrachloro-m-xylene 52.5 50.00 105 30.3 157 Sample ID LCSI-22012 SampType: LCS Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/20/2018 RunNo: 46383 Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 22012 Analysis Date: 9/20/2018 SegNo: 900496 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Aroclor 1016 1.13 0.100 1.000 0 113 38.5 149 Aroclor 1260 1.10 0.100 1.000 0 110 35.4 154 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 63.9 50.00 128 30.8 168 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 64.3 50.00 129 30.3 157 Sample ID LCS1D-22012 SampType: LCSD Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/20/2018 RunNo: 46383 Client ID: LCSS02 Batch ID: 22012 Analysis Date: 9/20/2018 SegNo: 900497 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC Lowl-imit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Aroclor 1016 0.983 0.100 1.000 0 98.3 38.5 149 1.130 13.9 20 Aroclor 1260 1.00 0.100 1.000 0 100 35.4 154 1.099 9.30 20 Sum Decachlorobiphenyl 62.7 50.00 125 30.8 168 0 Sum Tetrachloro-m-xylene 55.6 50.00 111 30.3 157 0 1 Original Fremont Date: 9/24/2018 Work Order: 1809255 QC SUMMARY REPORT CLIENT: PBS Engineering & Environmental Project: Wildwood ES Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) by EPA 8082 Sample ID LCS1D-22012 SampType: LCSD Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/20/2018 RunNo: 46383 Client ID: LCSS02 Batch ID: 22012 Analysis Date: 9/20/2018 SegNo: 900497 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qual Sample ID LCS2-22012 SampType: LCS Units: mg/Kg Prep Date: 9/20/2018 RunNo: 46383 Client ID: LCSS Batch ID: 22012 Analysis Date: 9/20/2018 SegNo: 900498 Analyte Result RL SPK value SPK Ref Val %REC LowLimit HighLimit RPD Ref Val %RPD RPDLimit Qua[ Aroclor 1254 0.969 0.100 1.000 0 96.9 31.9 167 Surr: Decachlorobiphenyl 55.4 50.00 111 30.8 168 Surr: Tetrachloro-m-xylene 54.4 50.00 109 30.3 157 Original Page 9 of1 Fremont P 07 7A Sample Log -in Check List Client Name: PBS Work Order Number: 1809255 Logged by: Clare Griggs Date Received: 9/17/2018 3:00:00 PM Chain 1. of Custody Is Chain of Custody complete? Yes ❑ No Not Present ❑ 2. How was the sample delivered? Client Log In 3. Coolers are present? Yes .. No NA ❑ Bulk materials. 4. Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes _✓_. No ❑ 5. Custody Seals present on shipping container/cooler? Yes .._ No ❑ Not Required ❑� (Refer to comments for Custody Seals not intact) 6. Was an attempt made to cool the samples? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑d 7. Were all items received at a temperature of >0°C to 10.0°C * Yes ❑ No ❑ NA d❑ 8. Sample(s) in proper container(s)? Yes No ❑ 9. Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)? Yes No ❑ 10. Are samples properly preserved? Yes No ❑ 11. Was preservative added to bottles? Yes ❑ No NA ❑ 12. Is there headspace in the VOA vials? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑� 13. Did all samples containers arrive in good condition (unbroken)? Yes ❑./ No ❑ 14. Does paperwork match bottle labels? Yes No ❑ 15. Are matrices correctly identified on Chain of Custody? Yes No ❑ 16. Is it clear what analyses were requested? Yes ❑d No ❑ 17. Were all holding times able to be met? Yes ❑d No ❑ Special Handling Cif apiglicabie� 18. Was client notified of all discrepancies with this order? Yes ❑d No ❑ NA ❑ Person Notified: 1Mark Hilev/Janet Murohv Date 9/18/2018 By Whom: (Clare Griggs Via: eMail ❑ Phone ❑ Fax ❑ In Person Regarding: 1Samoing dates missing from COC. Client Instructions: 18/31/18 19. Additional remarks: Item Information * Note: DoD/ELAP and TNI require items to be received at 4°C +/- 2°C Original Page 10 of 11 F�'G L A BO A70RV ClAghq OF C USTO®V Project: _ W ; ` 4I a S Analysis requested: CE 1014 Relirusi'd by/Signature n Received by/Sigraiufre: , E-mail results to: ❑ Brian Stanford ❑ Willem Mager ❑ Gregg Middaugh Mark Hiley Tim Ogden TURN AROUND TIME: ❑ 1 Hour ❑ 2 Hours ❑ 4 Hours Prudy Stoudt-McRae 0 Cel Alvarez Janet Murphy ❑ David Toy ❑ Martin Estira E_3 24 Hours ❑ 48 Hours Project Date: 2 /1-7 Air Date/Time: _ !! fil i Date/Tirne:_T M4 0° l SOO ❑ Chuck Greeb ❑ Mike Smith ❑ Ferman Fletcher ❑ Melissa Mearns Pr 3-5 Days ❑ Other SAMPLE DATA FORM Sample # Material Location dale G A S 3 S 0 Bggdec t/ .se 1&,n IL S Row Page 11 of 11 2517 EASTLAKE AVENUE EAST, SUITE 100, SEATTLE, WA 98102 0 206.233.9639 MAIN ° 866.727.0140 FAX o PaSUSA,COM APPENDIX D Certifications THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT JUSTIN DAY HAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE TRAINING COURSE for ASBESTOS INSPECTOR INITIAL COURSE In accordance with TSCA Title II, Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C of 40 CFR Course Date: 4/23/2018 - 4/25/2018 AHERA is the Asbestos Hazard Emergency PBS Response Act enacting Title II of Toxic Substance Course Location: Portland, OR Control Act (TSCA) Certificate: IN-18-6181B Expiration Date: 04/25/2019 For verification of the authenticity of this certificate contact: PBS Environmental 4412 SW Corbett Avenue Portland, OR 97239 (503) 248-1939 Greg Baker, Instructor Certt"f t'cate of Complett'on EPA Provider # 1085 Instructor This is to certify that Janet J. Murphy has satisfactorily completed 4 hours of refresher training as an AHERA Building Inspector to comply with the training requirements of TSCA Title II, 40 CFR 763 (AHERA) 167197 Certificate Number I IL A WAV -M TRAINING -CONSULTING n AlrBTaam COMPANY May 2, 2018 Expires in 1 year. Date(s) of Training Exam Score: If appropriate: ARGUS PACIFIC, INC / 1900 WEST NICKERSON ST,SUITE 3IS / SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98119 / 206.285.3373 /ARGUSPACIFIC.COM eertt"ft"rate of Complett"On This is to certify that Willem A. Mager has satisfactorily completed 4 hours of refresher training as an AHERA Building Inspector to comply with the training requirements of TSCA Title ll, 40 CFR 763 (AHERA) 165414 Certificate Number ■ D C� .W..T TRAINING -CONSULTING (� lr Feb 7, 2018 Date(s) of Training Exam Score: N.A Expires in 1 year A A Erracon COMPANY If appropriate: - I Instructor ARGUS PACIFIC, INC / 1900 WEST NICKERSON ST, SUITE 315 / SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98119 / 206.285.3373 /ARGUSPACIFIC.COM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 33325 8`h Avenue South � Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 CITY OF BECE4 VD 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 Federal Way JUN CITY OF FEDF AL'NAY COMMUNI-I-Y Dl=VE OPMEW HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INVENTORY STATEMENT CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AND WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS I. WHY SHOULD THIS INVENTORY STATEMENT BE FILLED OUT? Critical Aquifer Recharge (CARAs) and Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) are considered "critical areas" pursuant to Federal Way Revised Code (FWCC), Title 14, "Environmental Policy." This inventory statement must be filled out by the applicant or agent for any proposed activity listed in Section 11 of this handout, and which are located within Wellhead Capture Zones 1, 5, and 10 as shown on the Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas Maps. Please refer to the handout on Critical Aquifer Recharge and Wellhead Protection Areas for a description of the review process. H. ACTIVITIES GOVERNED BY CARA AND WHPA REGULATIONS The inventory statement must be filled out for the following activities: • Construction of any residential structure, including single-family development • Construction of any bam or other agricultural structure • Construction of any office, school, commercial, recreational, service, or storage building • Construction of a parking lot of any size • Other minor new construction (see WAC 197-11-800[2]) + Additions or modifications to or replacement of any building or facility (does not include tenant improvements) • Demolition of any structure • Any landfill or excavation • Installation of underground tanks • Any division of land, including short plats • Change of use, which involves repair, remodeling, and maintenance activities • Dredging • Reconstruction/maintenance of groins and similar shoreline protection structures Replacement of utility cables that must be buried under the surface of the bedlands • Repair/rebuilding of major dams, dikes, and reservoirs ■ Installation or construction of any utility, except for on -going operation and maintenance activities of public wells by public water providers ■ Personal wireless service facilities Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools 1'rQjectI�iante Applicant Federal _ _ Project Location 2405 S 300th St. Federal Way 98003 Tracking No..� III. TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Please provide the approximate quantity of the types of hazardous materials or deleterious substances that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or disposed of in connection with the proposed activity. If no hazardous materials will be involved, please proceed to Section IV. MATERIAL LIQUID gallons SOLID (pounds) (1) Acid or basic solutions or solids (2) Antifreeze or coolants (3) Bleaches, peroxides, detergents, surfactants, disinfectants, bactericides, algaecides (4) Brake, transmission, hydraulic fluids (5) Brine solutions (6) Corrosion or rust prevention solutions (7) Cutting fluids (8) Deicing materials 100# (9) Dry cleaning or cleaning solvents (10) Electroplating or metal finishing solutions (11) Engraving or etching solutions (12) Explosives 0 (13) Fertilizers 100# (14) Food or animal processing wastes (15) Formaldehyde (16) Fuels, additives, oils, greases Gas 2 Gal (17) Glues, adhesives, or resins (18) Inks, printing, or photocopying chemicals (19) Laboratory chemicals, reagents or standards (20) Medical, hospital, pharmaceutical, dental, or veterinary fluids or wastes _ (21) Metals (hazardous e.g. arsenic, copper, chromium, lead, mercu , silver, etc.) (22) Paints, pigments, dyes, stains, varnish, sealers. 25 Gal (23) Pesticides, herbicides or poisons 40 Gal (24) Plastic resins, plasticizers, or catalysts (25) Photo development chemicals (26) Radioactive sources (27) Refrigerants, cooling water (contact) (28) Sludges, still bottoms (29) Solvents, thinners, paint removers or strippers 10 Gal (30) Tanning (leather) chemicals (3 1) Transformer, capacitor oils/fluids, PCB's _ (32) Waste oil (33) Wood preservatives (34) List OTHER hazardous materials or deleterious substances on a separate sheet. Bulletin #056 — January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement Project Name Wildwood Elementary School _ Applicant Federal Way Public Schools Project Location _MaS�,�S . NOW Wa. 98003 Tracking No. IV. FURTHER INFORMATION Provide the approximate quantity of fill and source of fill to be imported to the site. Check box # 1 if you do not plan to store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous material or deleterious substance listed in Section III. Check box(s) #2 through #5 (and fill in appropriate blanks) of the below table if they apply to your facility or activity. #1 [ ] The proposed development will not store, handle, treat, use, produce, recycle, or dispose of any of the types and quantities of hazardous materials or deleterious substances listed above. #2 [x ] Above ground storage tanks, having a capacity of_1000_ gallons will be installed. #3 [ ] E Construction vehicles will be refueled on site. #4 [ ] Storage within wholesale and retail facilities of hazardous materials, or other deleterious substances, will be for sale in original containers with a capacity of _ gallons liquid or _pounds solid, The presence of chemical substances on this parcel is/will be for "temporary" non -routine maintenance or repair of the facility (such as paints and paint thinners) and are in individual containers with a capacity of 10 gallons liquid or __pounds solid. Check any of the following items that currently exist or are proposed in connection with the development of the site. #1 [x ] Stormwater infiltration system (e.g., french drain, dry well, stormwater swale, etc.) #2 [ x ] Hydraulic lifts or elevator, chemical systems, or other machinery that uses hazardous materials #3 [ J Cathodic protection wells 44 [ ] Water wells, monitoring wells, resource protection wells, piezometers #5 [x ] Leak detection devices, training for employees for use of hazardous materials, self-contained n=Wnery, etc. SIGNATIIIt L Signature Print Name a(. -Z(. .2if Date Ifyou have any questions about filling out this application form, please call the Department of Community Development Services at 253-835-2607. Please be advised that an application for a development permit lacking the required information will not be accepted. Bulletin #056 —January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 3 k:\Handouts\Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement FEDERAL WAY Department of PUBLIC SCHOOLS Maintenance & Operations TO: City of Federal Way Community Development FROM: Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations RECEIVED PROJECT: Wildwood Elementary School JUN 2 4 2019 SUBJECT: FWPS Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement CITY OF FEDEPAL WAY COMMUNCTY DEVELOPMENT DATE: June 24, 2019 This memorandum is regarding the Federal Way Public Schools capital bond projects Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) 19.145.490 (FWRC 19.185.070). Specifically for Mirror Lake Elementary School hazardous material inventory statement, an operations and management manual using best management practices (BMPs), and integrated pest management (IMP) for fertilizer and pesticide/herbicide applications. Federal Way Public Schools (FWPS) has attached their Washington State Department of Agriculture Pest Management record application log for Mirror Lake. Our list of Pre -approved pesticides, these are the only pesticides approved to be used on District property. Fertilizer is not on this log due to the fact that we do not need to report it to the state. Here's the information on the fertilizer: Simplot Partners 20-0-5 X-Cote slow release, normally applied spring and fall 4.5 lbs. per 1000 square feet. Fertilizer is only applied to the Play / Sports Field. FWPS is a Star Certified School District. Our philosophy has always been to use chemicals very sparingly around our facilities. We have also always used the least toxic products that will do the job. We always follow our Integrated Pest Management (IPM) policy, this serves as the Districts pesticide use policy referred to in the law. Mike Benzien Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. 1211 S. 332"d St, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 p.253.945.5930 I f.253.945.59591 www.fwps.org Administrative Policies and Procedures Series: 6000 — Administration and Management Support PEST AND PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT AND NOTIFICATION: 6895 - ATTACHMENT A Pre -approved Pesticides The following pesticides have been pre -approved for use by the Federal Way Public Schools. Only chemicals on this list are allowed for possession or use within the district. Any new chemical must be pre -approved by the IPM Coordinator prior to its purchase or use within the district. No chemicals will be purchased or otherwise brought onto a district site by anyone other than authorized Maintenance Department staff. Additional chemicals may be added to this list on an as -needed basis for specific uses throughout the year. These additions must have the approval of the IPM Coordinator. Chemical Intended Use Crossbow Used to control blackberry vines; Casoron Pre -emergent herbicide used to control weeds and grasses; Ranger Pro Non -selective herbicide used to control weeds and grasses; Ronstar Pre -emergent herbicide used to control weeds and grasses on gravel and sports tracks; Round-up/Max Pro Non -selective herbicide used to control weeds and grasses; Snapshot Pre -emergent herbicide used to control weeds and grasses on fence lines and warming tracks; Trimec Herbicide used to control weeds in grass areas; Wasp Freeze Insecticide used to kill wasps and bees. Adopted under Policy Governance — 8/28/12 Adopted or Previously Revised — 07/02 Federal Way Public Schools Page 1 of 1 Annual Pesticide Report 11712018 - 412312019 Mix Prod. Product - Area Applicator DateiTime Site Pest Product Amt Mix Unit Amt unit Cone. Rate Treated TemvWindSneed Name W itdwond 08109AB 08:00-i3:15 IlowerK-4%parklo Weeds Crossbow 2,1M gal 4&00 ounces 1.S9k 41 2 ac GG 5W 4-5 Vern Stoffcl t,sidewalk.fcnccli 08109/18 08:00-13:15 ne,partahle f1mverbeds,parklo Weeds Ranger Pro 24.00 gal 66,00 ounces 2% 41 2 ac 66 SW 4-5 Vern SWffel t,sldewalk,fmceh 04/12/19 07:20-03.40 ne,portable flowcrbcds parklo Wcads CASORON 6.00 pounds 6.00 pounds 1009/0 100 lbslacre I acre 47 N11-I Vern Stnffel t,s'sdewalk.fencelf 04/12/19 07:20.08:40 ae.portablc Howe rbe:ds,parklo Weeds Crossbow 12.00 gallons 24.00 ounccs I.5°�° 41 8allacrc I acre 47 N 0-i Vern Ssnffcl t,sidcwalk,Fenceli 04/12/19 07:20-08:40 ne.portable Ilowerbeds,parklo Weeds Ranger Pro 12.00 gallons 32.00 ounccs 2°h A i gallacru I acre 47 N 0-I Vern Ssoffcl t,6dewalk.fcnceli ne,portahlc WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — PO 18802269 Lakehaven ProjectREE,CP"ED AGREEMENT JUN 24 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into in duplicate between the LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, King County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the District" and FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, hereinafter referred to as "the Developer". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the District operates and maintains a water distribution system within its boundaries which can serve property of the Developer, and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to construct certain water mains and appurtenances at its own cost to serve the Developer's property, for delivery to and operation by the District, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that: 1. The land for which domestic water service is requested and to which this Agreement applies, is realty in King County, Washington, legally described in Exhibit "A" and generally depicted in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. By executing this Agreement, the Developer represents and warrants that it is the owner of record of the above -described property. If such representation of ownership is invalid, this Agreement shall be void as to the portion of the property not owned by the Developer. The Developer agrees that the District may require the Developer to furnish a title report for the property at the Developer's expense. 2. All newly created legal descriptions shall be furnished by the Developer and shall be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. Each newly created legal description shall be accompanied by a drawing that graphically depicts the legal description. 3. The Developer has paid the required deposit as set forth in District Resolution No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto. Said deposit shall be applied against actual expenses of the District, including all bacteriological testing and sampling. The District shall determine, on a regular basis, its actual costs associated with the project, including taxes, and shall submit to the Developer an invoice to repay the District for actual costs in excess of the amount previously collected. Payment shall be due as noted on said invoice. Off -hours labor, including overhead, costs for such inspections will be charged to the project on an DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 1 of 8 overtime basis. The Developer agrees that the project account shall remain current for the life of the project and delinquency of any kind shall induce work stop action/orders, suspension/termination of service or any other action necessary to effect collection of monies owed the District. In the event monies are owed the District for work on, or unpaid charges allocated to, the project, as determined by the District, Developer agrees that the District shall be entitled to recover such monies by withholding and making application for payment to itself, any assignment of funds, cash deposits or latecomer reimbursements otherwise owing to the Developer. In the event that the deposit exceeds the District's actual expenses, the District shall issue to the Developer, at project closing, a refund of such unused amounts. 4. Except as noted herein, all work conducted by the District will be performed during normal work hours. The Developer may, at their discretion, submit a written request to the District for District non-exempt staff to expend overtime for tasks and services related to the completion of this Agreement. Said written request(s) shall state the Developer's reasons for the request(s) that would qualify it as an "emergency" (e.g., "excessive" additional expenses for any delays in plan review (actual/estimated figures should be provided), approaching unfavorable weather conditions for construction, permit expirations, etc.). Each written request submitted to the District for this purpose should also specify any component limitations the Developer desires (e.g., request for plan review/approval, request for construction inspections, etc.). S. In the event work and construction described herein is not completed within five (5) years from the date of application for this Agreement, said application date being OCTOBER 5, 2018, the District can terminate the Agreement without notice, the Agreement shall then be void, and a new Developer Extension Agreement Application, along with applicable fee, will be required to re -commence and subsequently complete said work. 6. It is agreed by the parties that time is of the essence in all matters relating to the performance of this Agreement. 7. The Developer agrees that all requests for modification to District standards, specifications, policies or Resolution shall be submitted in writing to the District. Such requests shall be reviewed and the District will provide a written response to each submitted written request. 8. The District shall review final plans and specifications for water distribution system construction to be performed by the Developer under this Agreement. If preliminary plans are not deemed acceptable by the District, the Developer shall be obligated to revise the plans and specifications in accordance with design standards deemed acceptable by the District. In the event that more than three (3) items are found to remain deficient by the District on the third submittal of plans, subsequent review by District staff may be billed at a factor of 1.5 times the standard rate without further notice to the Developer. The Developer shall submit final plans for construction in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment), and on standard print media (24"x36" or 22"x34" size), prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. After the Developer has been notified in writing by the District that final plans and specifications have been approved, and all other necessary items have been addressed and resolved, the Developer and the Developer's contractor shall meet with the District's representatives for a preconstruction meeting before construction is commenced. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 2 of 8 9. The Developer agrees that it shall be responsible for providing to the District accurate and reliable information concerning the actual location of the facilities constructed. In furtherance of this obligation, the Developer shall procure from LPE ENGINEERING PLLC, or other licensed engineer or surveyor that the Developer has indicated will be consulting on the construction phase of the project, a written statement, which shall be submitted to the District prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, stating that accurate data will be collected during construction of the facilities to enable the engineer/surveyor to submit actual and reliable "as -built" locations to the District, based upon the information available to the engineer/surveyor during construction and also by field survey of the constructed facilities that are accessible at the ground surface. The Developer shall cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, a certificate of insurance for the engineer's/surveyor's Errors and Omissions policy. The Developer shall also cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, a certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the engineer's/surveyor's General Liability policy, naming the District as an additional insured as respects the obligations set forth in this section. The limits for Errors and Omissions and General Liability Insurance shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 for each claim; $1,000,000.00 aggregate. At the conclusion of construction and prior to and as a condition of acceptance, the engineer/surveyor shall deliver to the District its certification that it has made periodic field investigations and measurements during construction and that the "as -built" drawings submitted to the District, which drawings shall be provided in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment) and on original or fixed -line photo mylar, are accurate and reliable. The District shall have the right to approve any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor during the project and the Developer agrees that the District may refuse any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor or may condition the same on resubmittal of the certification of location described above. No approval of any new engineer or surveyor shall be unreasonably withheld by the District. 10. The District will make application for the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 'Right-of-way Construction Permit(s)'. The Developer acknowledges familiarity with the provisions of such Right-of-way Construction Permit(s) and agrees that it or its contractor's failure to comply with any of the provisions of the permit(s) shall entitle the District, in addition to the right to enforce any other remedy available to the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY as the permitting party, to immediately stop all construction activity on the right-of-way until the violation or violations have been eliminated and corrected to the satisfaction of the District and the District should not be held liable for any damages, either direct or indirect, for the delay and expense of such work stoppage. The Developer shall procure all other state, county and city licenses or permits. 11. The Developer agrees this Agreement shall create twenty -foot (20') wide [pipe(s) offset five -feet (5') from nearest margin] non-exclusive easement areas and right-of- way granted to the District for water distribution facilities and all appurtenances related thereto, as indicated on water facility construction plans approved by the District for the project, respectively, through, over and across the Developer's property. This easement shall be maintained in full force and effect unless superseded and replaced by another easement as determined acceptable by the District. 12. In the event an easement is required over realty other than realty described in Paragraphs No. 1 & No. 11 herein, such easement, in form acceptable to the District, together with title report or other sufficient proof of ownership of such realty, shall be delivered to the DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 3 of 8 District prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. The Developer shall be obligated to obtain a written release from any property owner across whose property construction is performed pursuant to the grant of an easement, sufficient to indicate that the site restoration on the easement is satisfactory and complete. 13. Prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, the Developer shall deliver to the District a restoration performance bond in a sum to be determined by the District after receipt of any required Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and/or after the determination of off -site restoration requirements related to the work described herein, conditioned that the Developer will restore to the satisfaction of the District, and state, county, and city agencies as applicable, all work to be performed hereunder in public rights -of -way and the District's easements. Form and contents of bond shall be determined by the District. This requirement is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held accountable for any such restoration. Should any restoration work be determined necessary, Developer will be notified to complete the restoration work. If such work is not corrected within the specified time, the District will perform the work and issue an invoice to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid within thirty (30) days of issue date. 14. Construction shall be performed in accordance with the District's approved plans, standards and specifications and only under the supervision of a licensed contractor experienced in the installation of water distribution system facilities and the related work. 15. Two (2) sets of materials submittals shall be submitted to the District as one package, bound and indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment/material to be furnished for this project. Each submitted piece of equipment/material shall be fully defined by catalog number and reference made as to its applicable section of the District's standard specifications. Materials submittals shall be submitted prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. 16. By execution of this Agreement, the District does not guarantee water service will be provided to realty described herein. In the event that any of the District's facilities, such as storage tanks, wells, and water transmission mains become utilized beyond their design or approved capacity or become inoperable for any cause, the District reserves the right to refuse any connections which would use such facility until remedial action has been completed, and the District shall not be liable for any direct or consequential damages which occur to the Developer arising out of such the District's refusal to connect or time delay necessary to take remedial action. 17. The Developer and its agents agree to indemnify and hold the District harmless from any and all claims which may be assessed against the District as a result of the construction or maintenance of the work described in this Agreement prior to acceptance by the District. The Developer shall maintain in full force and effect during the construction period, the following insurance: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance with bodily injury and property damage limits of not less than: $1,000,000.00 Each Occurrence $2,000,000.00 General Aggregate $2,000,000.00 Products -Completed Operations Aggregate Limit DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 4 of 8 b. Business Auto Liability coverage for all owned, non -owned, and hired autos with bodily injury and property damage limits of not less than: $1,000,000.00 Each Accident A certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the Developer's Commercial General Liability Insurance policy, showing the District as additional insured as respects the work to be performed under this Agreement, shall be provided prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. Thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the District for cancellation or expiration of this insurance. 18. The Developer shall notify the District the date work and construction described in this Agreement will commence, and said notice shall be given not less than 72 hours (not including Saturday, Sunday, or national holidays) prior to such date. No water distribution system facility shall be covered prior to inspection by the District. After work is commenced, it shall vigorously, consistently, and in a first-class workmanlike manner be carried to completion. The Developer shall maintain at the construction area at all times during construction, a representative to whom District notices may be given regarding construction. Said representative shall be designated in writing by the Developer before start of work. The Developer may request inspections during construction upon two (2) days notice to the District. 19. Testing of water system facilities shall be performed as required by the District and only after satisfactory tests have been completed and witnessed by the District's designated agent, will the work be accepted. The Developer agrees that at such time as the District has performed inspection of the water distribution system facilities & system connections and has delivered itemized punch lists to the Developer and/or the Developer's contractor, that the project will be pursued to final completion, including the performance of all necessary site restoration. 20. Upon completion of construction, the Developer or the Developer's contractor shall deliver to the District a guarantee in the amount of ten percent (10%) of construction costs or $5,000.00, whichever is greater, that a reliable contractor will make and pay for repairs necessary within two (2) years from the date of acceptance of said construction, arising from faulty labor or material. Form of guarantee is to be approved by general counsel for the District. This requirement is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held accountable for any such repairs. Should any defects be discovered within the specified 2-year time period, Developer will be notified and given ample time to correct same. If defects are not corrected within the specified time, Lakehaven will perform the work and issue an invoice to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid within thirty (30) days of issue date. This paragraph shall be valid beyond the release of this Agreement and until the District closes out the associated project account. 21. Upon completion of construction, the Developer shall submit, for acceptance and approval of the District, Bills of Sale for water distribution system facilities, mains and appurtenances installed and constructed pursuant to this Agreement, in a form acceptable to the District, together with such other engineering records and project cost data as may be required by the District. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 5 of 8 22. As a condition of District acceptance of the project, the Developer shall submit to the District a non-refundable warranty inspection fee for water, as set forth in District Resolution No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto, to be held by the District and applied against actual expenses of the District incurred to complete warranty inspections following the two-year warranty period. 23. In the event new or modified District easements are required over Developer's property described herein, such easements, in form acceptable to the District, shall be delivered to the District as a condition of & prior to the activation of any new or modified service connections for the property. 24. In the event the Developer requests and the District provides water meters for the realty described herein, prior to the District's acceptance of work, the Developer agrees to be solely responsible for any loss or damage to such water meters or their installation, which occurs prior to said acceptance of work by the District. 25. Work and construction performed under this Agreement shall not be connected to the District's water distribution systems until all provisions and requirements of this Agreement and District Resolutions, on the part of the Developer, have been fully complied with. 26. The District and the Developer agree that in carrying out the terms of this contract, the Developer shall be acting as an independent contractor and in no respect shall Developer be deemed an agent or partner of the District. 27. The Developer shall not assign this contract without the written consent of the District. 28. The District shall provide water service following the District's acceptance of the water distribution facilities for operation and maintenance and upon payment of the connection charges as set forth and in accordance with District Resolution No. 2017-1300. Said connection charges shall consist of the Capital Facilities Charge (CFQ, Service &/or Meter Installation Charge &/or Deposit, and any other such charges levied in accordance with said District Resolution No. 2017-1300 or amendments thereto or any other applicable District Resolution at time service is requested. 29. The parties agree that, if determined applicable by the District, the provision of latecomer reimbursements for system facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement will be handled by separate agreement to be executed between the parties within a reasonable time following acceptance of the facilities and establishment of the appropriate latecomer reimbursement area by the District's Board of Commissioners. Any applicable latecomer reimbursement period will be limited to 15 years, or longer, pursuant to the provisions of state law. 30. Partial waiver or waiver by acquiescence by the District of any provision or condition of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other provision or condition of this Agreement. 31. This Agreement shall constitute an easement and servitude upon the property described herein and shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors in interest to the DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 6 of 8 Developer. This Agreement shall constitute an equitable lien against property described herein and in the event of nonperformance by the Developer, as stated herein, the District may foreclose said lien in the manner authorized by law. 32. This writing constitutes the full and only agreement between the parties, there being no promises, agreements or understandings, written or oral, except as herein set forth, or as hereinafter may be amended in writing. 33. Upon execution of this Agreement, the parties agree in the event either of them is required to enforce any provision or provisions of this Agreement against the other, that the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to all other amounts to which it is otherwise entitled by this Agreement, to its actual attorney's fees and costs, including those incurred on appeal. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 7 of 8 WITNESS our hands and seals. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Date: .-kit 82-41D O State of lN4 County of KV1 LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT King County, Washington Dev lopment ngineering Manager Dated: /1 This record was acknowledged before me on 8, 2-0 1 1 (DW te) by aly m i Q bP� as S Name) (Type of Authority, Title) of -Ae+AJ Lv -?V-,-t4 L sthVol s (Company Name) 61 DATED: - i1� ��1 hiA, ; (5ignatur Notary Pu is Title My appointment expires Mary Lucille Helbling Notary Public S'fste of Washington MY Appdnbm�t E�Uas 03/10021 For recording in the State of Washington, the Notarial Seal must be fully legible and cannot intrude into document margins. Please affix seal in the space provided. 31101 Zo2A DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD. TAX PARCEL NO. 0421049167 EXHIBIT "'B" PROPERTY DEPICTION 768122000701 61220010 29849 29846 4 7682200080 x F78220009 29855 29852 0421049134 0421049204 30050 0421049153 10491 2328 421049092 2329 851001 30300 �79851'00 SQ .-- 30319 7985100160 4U 2104101 30313 30232 T f. V85100090 ,3r»1-7 I 30316 220U240J j 1 z511 N 8220030 -1 - `� 29908 x 68220029 N 29914 s 3007-H S r 0421049167 2405 D 100 200 FEEL 16550001 2500 6550001 5 302ND PL 50 0017)0x `�6550 0026 f � 2507 N 9850001 85000160 2617 / 500021 2616 5000220 2615 RECEIVED Lakehaven JUN 2 4 2019 WATER & SEWER DISTRICT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY .SEWER CERTIFICATE OF AVAILA131'VppPOMMUNI7Y DEVELOPieAENT Lakehaven Water & Sewer District - Development Engineering Section 31623 - 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 * Email: DE@Lakehaven.org This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, sewer service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ❑ Building Permit-SFR () ❑ Building Permit-MFR () ® Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision () ❑ Short Subdivision () ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Other (specify/describe) Tax Parcel Number(s): 0421049167 Site Address: 2405 S 3001h St Lakehaven GIS Grid: L-06 Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: 0 sf {existing to be_demalished) New Bldg. Area Proposed: 60.000 sf SEWER SYSTEM INFORMATION 1. ® Sewer service can be provided by service connection to an existing 8" diameter sewer manhole that is approximately 5+/ feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed land use. 2. ❑ Sewer service for the site will require an improvement to Lakehaven's sanitary sewer system of: ❑ a. feet of " diameter sewer main or trunk to reach the site; and/or ❑ b. The construction of a sanitary sewer collection system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive wastewater system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ❑ d. Other (describe): 3. ® a. The existing sewer system is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan. ❑ b. The existing sewer system is not in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The proposed site land use is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of sewer service outside of Lakehaven's sewer service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Sewer service is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ❑ b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven; ® c. Other: Sewer service connection r i uired (one to disconnect existing. one,re-connect new). Comments/special conditions: The site has one (X ) existing sewer connection (SSCP 1738)Jo�YonUnknown. I hereby certify that the above sewer system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR Signature: Date: 0421049167 swr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Page 1 of 2 7883 0022D 7"822GODIF, �_: 822DD3i788380D2 0 57 22001 0 2519 2521 2223 -- 00` —�`7 Z9810 - _� 7$ ?2D�340.:'' 7r?83800= 838a7f3- 29818 380a ��• 29817 1 lff4o 29824.:'' r 2845 83800193 I 2331 2220503 � 1$ Y 82200�30 �— _ 7$8�800�50 7@S38fl0 S 129525 75822 l'3 ��-. r' 25128 2641 78 3500 fl4 29828 788220004D 298 S r-'822,01) 82r —1 1 29$29 1 1". 2512 V822003 0 7883B00280 883 0 I{_ F 83800t09 7 822DQOPa r� 8.2�,200 20 — f 83 2025 8380020/ ry 83900219 29835 I �83e °car 086-5 Q041-3 -� 03-250- 2349 7ti8?2 D? 1 - 29841 f 7 822D0DPE� u 22003 D 7 838002182i-250- 298438 8 ff �Pt3 2200 _ 29902 7£838QD2 7 e 7 822a00r T68 D0�30 2517 0522 Q04 Z 220,$ 78 3800 13— 29849 +— — 27A 299 - �� f9'85 ��� 242 r9 500J 2 29925 r' 83S 021 2<i10 822D008 �88 002 4 2? q_ F3t8 .8D02�3 29855 BS 2D0D9D 2412 rQS239 290 2620 9850 951 4 H145�2 0113 S73 i�7`rS"r 8�— 2991 11 8'. r �� -.___•V r flDD5--.�._ Fr-S-'U f70 r3.YC 0171-32-A — 79 5IIII0II�7 8 DDI D� 04, 1i74;'r133 IT 2613 � 3000r 2209 f +� 0 031T 8 0421049134 ?5221 12 lk' r $ 000300 ]y 7�-3 -A cart 0421049091 a020 79 0ODIC� 30119 0421049167 2617 ti 8,000290 1294-85 2405 e 102 'bDD1r0 _ 0421049204 2521 179 aga28i3' 30050110 U 0421049153 `26�\2i3 5 4 1�t49�#3.1-r 42i i35 w�!f98 0021U - 0421049244 Q5aQi1 4 1049 11 3412-1 � r � 33121 2320 7 50D0220 -- 2a` PVC 2815; 1798-00 f II �04-EL3 129 - 39'D4� -UDDTF 4` Su230 I 3 421049191985101i;1-1 3025f 42104 130 D 21Q490. . 3030 7981D012D 2544a 3E5FbD090 04fff 91 3920 2329 8513A�W55�D0i5 8Q44 4210 148 1302 1 OT V - 2a.?-13i 2321 550D�1 = 342 79$ 00180 r985 aatl 0 � F 15 � 71D491 3 30205j 55000- — 04210491 1 3Q224 �1'3— 30316 � 2507 [ 850D007 — 38 50D0 sD ` 3D219 �i_ , 5060180 5 fl002°,a — 2529 1302a4 D4 is�492 , �42104D 61 79 5100012 1 5r 212 , . Da009� — 7_50002'r0 �30303 3023i� 738 a0180 30320 '. �55II0D 1 — ��- - 4210491 5 0421049170 D7T l 221 2513 3t}aF0003i _. � [ � 7ss4s0 a.7.�_ 30239 30234 — 42104 218 19 5?0{ID fl F 55DD02 4 r 302 1 ----- 30 2 95000320 , 22N17 0421 49125 �s3 30332� 7 5500aD4 C T S w 1 le n 51D� 4D 42104 122 30221 30228 — 550D02 — �� D42104 0 0 210491 1 30335 - �+ 202 4 — Q42 04914 r —_ 98 7 5 1iTrR7; '5`1) -0 0421 491293023£+ 75 4 - ae. 04z 02,5 7 5100 20_ `�I �30 D = 492511 365f 0 020 tt7TE: La}�ehaven Water and 5eu•er District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information prayWed Facility locations and conditions are subjecttofield verification - Sewer Certificate of Availability Parcel 0421049167 a loci 200 Feet V512019 KCI 0421049167 swr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Page 2 of 2 Lakehaven RECEIVED JUN 2 4 2019 WATER & SEWER DISTRICT CITY OF FEDERAL WAY MUNITY DEVELOPMENT Lakehaven Water & Sewer District - Development Engineering Section 31623 - 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Email: DE@Lakehaven.org * Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, water service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ❑ Building Permit-SFR () ❑ Subdivision () ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Building Permit-MFR () ❑ Short Subdivision () ❑ Other (specify/describe) ® Building Permit -Other ❑ Binding Site Plan Tax Parcel Number(s): 0421049167 Site Address: 2405 S 30011 St Lakehaven GIs Grid: L-06 Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: 0 sf (existing to be demolished) New Bldg. Area Proposed: 60,000 sf WATER SYSTEM NFO MA ION 1. ❑ Water service can be provided by service connection to an existing " diameter water main that is approximately feet from the site. 2. ® Water service for the site will require an improvement to Lakehaven's water distribution system of: ® a. 45 + - feet of 8" diameter water main to reach the site; and/or ® b. The construction of a water distribution system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive water system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ® d. Other (describe): Lakehaven Developer Extension (_DE) Agreement required. 3. ® a. The existing water system is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan. ❑ b. The existing water system is not in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The subject property is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of water service outside of Lakehaven's water service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Water service is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ® b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven; ® c. Other: DE Agreement (#2 above) pr-oJect must be accepted by Lakehaven. prior to any domestic or Irrkgatipp service connection activation. Comments/special conditions: Protect existing water &/or sewer mains during Co�rstruc�ion. The nearest fire hydrants will be located on the Property (number & location TBD by fire marshal). System hydraulic model results (FF #343a, copy attached) indicate that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable liquid velocity of 10 ft/s in the existing (and proposed new onsite) water distribution system, at no less than 20 psi is exceeded at a fire flow rate above 1800 GPM. This flow figure depicts the theoretical performance of the water distribution system under high demand conditions. Fire flow rates greater than this may be accommodated through water distribution system improvements, contact Lakehaven for additional information. 578 Pressure Zone Est. Meter Elevations)-GIS: 496+/-, Est. Pressure Range at Meter(s) (psi): 32-41 I hereby certify that the above water system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR Signature: Date: 0421049167 wtr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Page 1 of 2 7883 00220 220061 B220037 78838002 7083800200 57 _81 2 80001 0 2519 2$21 OT90 +�' 0 4 220002 78822 �1 0' 7 83800 1 2205 29818 B83S00' 29817 - 298 1 29824 T _ 2381 7 8220003 - 7882 0 88220Q 30 2845 78 3800 04 78838D02 5 29825 29828 7683800 -90 82 29828 7882280040 60210 7882200 00 2641 �- 38Q021 a 0005 22D0 20 0 2" 2512 ty 29 3220 7683800280 B38002D 29834 171383SO0219 29835 2983 —_ 0310 2825 • . 29841 7883$00218 2349 2200078822 0-11�- $ 29$ 02 02 53800207 a 29844 - — 29843 _ 17 +�8 00070 7$$ a ' 0 000080 �9$5000 0 2}847 76 3800 13 29 49 �$25 D24U - 7985 000 252 28 0 8380020 2310 r 8220013 922 0 14 79 5000 70 29925 - 29852 .29914 91 Q 258�5� S22 0280 294 2825 30fl05 - � • 0 21049133 6` C7 500 • Ol — S fl3 2209 ¢` C7 2104918 261 5 2405 5000 10 8 00033 1� 0421049134 fin b 5000 0 850 1 2018 300 T Ex. , 79 MOii 0421049091 V Hydrant w 17 30119 - {typ)Cr _ Z 7985 0180 0421049204 25 0 fq 3005r 5000 90}�. ear . 0421049153 Ex. V11tr Svc r 850002 2828 �y ' 39 #11203, 2" Domestic 2516 2 '� I D 49131 �. i58A8L101 i 0421049, 4 2<iO4 29 #35720, 2 Irrigation 1 #37855, 6" Fire 198500 • 0 2012 30121 8421 4921 261 798. OD2 0 r 79800 421049191 . 8510 1 40 3i13 4 f 2519 3 3D5 42104�13fl,0 210490 3030 �� 50004 0 25 8 ,�F fl� 35 5000,20 4;Z48 04'?1Q491 2 3020 2329 985 1 QD 6522 30211 210 9148 3030 �{.. T - 0 0- --042TU-4T !i -98 100 00 �- € 302 7 042104 113 79851 016Q 1 0421049171 3022 30 13 ' 0090 'a31 3S55a0 Q 55000[F 30219 30 16— 50001 0 500 290 204 •• 21049 01 51000 0 30213 5 000250 �252 313550 0900- 30303 U 3023q 798 100180 30320 - 550001 5500027 202 2 2513 550003T 0421049T4 .71 0421049170 30221 _ _ 798480 30239 30234 04'§21 79851 01 798 100 0 0240 a02 1 W550 2 5.,000320 g 328 302-21 365500 040 030- 42104 122 30 8 042104 4 10491 5 51000 0 36550O 2 302 4 550fla03 2104 2.5 0421 49121 `+ 3033$ 302 5 0421 4912 30238 16 41,017912 239 5100 R 30 0 2- 4 58 .. 3855000 20 .. OS4 28 ROTE lakehmmn Water and Sewer District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information provided Facility locations and condition5 are suhjecttofieldverification. 0421049167 wtr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Water Certificate of Availability Parcel 042 1049167 ice 230 Feel 2/5/2019 KCM Page 2 of 2 lakehaven fr:_/AITR WAA(rIR M ; r;r. Hydraulic Model Fire Flow Estimate Request/Reporting Form Requested By: Federal Way Public Schools Date: 7/20/18 Location to be Modeled: proposed Hydrants for Wildwood Elementry Lakehaven'/a Section Grid: L/6 Intersection: S 300" St & 24th Ave S Add. Description: See attached map Pressure Zone: 578 Results By: Date: Model Run No.: John Bowmarc,�b 7/26/18 Master Water System Model 2007.net FF #343a Condition Pressure (psi) Flow (gpm) Static 33 0 Fire Flow 20 1800 NOTES: Lakehaven's adopted level of service goals for fire flow rates are 1000 gpm within single family residential areas (including duplexes) and 2500 gpm for multi -family, commercial, industrial areas. Model results depict the theoretical performance of the water system under high demand conditions and are not guaranteed to represent actual system performance. A design professional should be consulted for site specific design purposes. The calculated fire flow capacity in the above table is based on a currently available residual system pressure of 20 psi at the location modeled. Fire flow capacities greater than 1800 gpm may be accommodated through water system improvements. 072618FF 343a - Wi ldWOOd (Form Update 1/6/17) r:".• s M 11SH CONCRETE f MV JRO [5YP} ' `4' Dr WALKWAY {rT .: - CONCRUE VERWAL CURS MR) ASPHALT r - ' : w PBCK-UP 1 '• CONNECT ra CANCRT Fl1i5H - _ - _ BLOC ORWEEAS WAM QURO CTYP 0 Mpg •^ IF71Wgo}, NEIr 5' 9DEWALK� FLV91 CONCRETE •• •._ , .......� ' CURS .•TSsti.;.. :i FIRE HM CI.• j SSMH [TTP} � I .•..�� ss CONHECnON . •" � CCU Pur AREA Ia Fnnc w�ssca t-: • 2 S' SkW Vtr SEWER .".." AT 1.0% Fl*k WEST O' DIP.�-- 1 ......... WINO TO EX SSUH ••�' ••• 'r 240' b'" pr .r- I� rjflll PLAY FIELD As 'pr-pn<1 4., J S L 490+) �c f Li - yy�..��� �'^ 1E scale r�401 W T, 1a a wa.r w.a. .t srRw1� 0 A.=m aecs ia7�� 0 p.1��iarr ®3 . � mt r ..�_' noWaiova¢u•. J O V O x f U �6m�H O Q (%jLU m rxa S Q —iLU O 0 W � O W J lL PAVING 6 UTILffY PLM C-300 SCHMAncr)MGN a s s o c i a t e d RECEIVED )a e a r t h s c i e n c e s i n c o r p o r a t e d JUN 2 4 2019 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT Federal Way, Washington FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT Project No. 180215E001 June 6, 2018 Revised April 10, 2019 a s s o c i a t e d earth sciences i n s c i p o r a t e d June 6, 2018 Revised April 10, 2019 Project No. 180215EO01 Federal Way School District 1211 South 332nd Street Federal Way, Washington 98003 Attention: Mr. Ray Vefik Subject: Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Wildwood Elementary School Replacement 2405 South 300th Street Federal Way, Washington Dear Mr. Vefik: We are pleased to present the enclosed copies of the above -referenced report. This report summarizes the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and geotechnical engineering studies, and offers preliminary recommendations for the design and development of the proposed project. We were provided with a Topographic Survey provided by AHBL, dated May 8, 2018, for preparation of this report. Our recommendations are preliminary in that project plans and construction methods were not available at the time this report was written. We should be allowed to review the recommendations presented in this report and modify them, if needed, once final project plans have been formulated. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident that the recommendations presented in this report will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or if we can be of additional help to you, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer KDM/ms-180215E001-6 - Projects\20180215\KE\WP Kirkland Office 1911 Fifth Avenue I Kirkland, WA 98033 P 1425.827.7701 Mount Vernon Office 1 508 S. Second Street, Suite 1011 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 P 1425.827.7701 Tacoma Office 1 1552 Commerce Street, Suite 102 1 Tacoma, WA 98402 P 1253.722.2992 www.aesgeo.com SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION, GEOLOGIC HAZARD, AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REPLACEMENT Federal Way, Washington Prepared for: Federal Way School District 1211 South 332"d Street Federal Way, Washington 98003 Prepared by: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. 9115th Avenue Kirkland, Washington 98033 425-827-7701 June 6, 2018 Revised April 10, 2019 Project No. 180215E001 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions I. PROJECT AND SITE CONDITIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration, geologic hazard, and preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the replacement of the Wildwood Elementary School in Federal Way, Washington. Our recommendations are preliminary in that the project is still early in the design phase. Recommendations in this report are based on review of a topographic survey by AHBL, dated May 8, 2018. The site location is shown on the "Vicinity Map," Figure 1. The approximate locations of explorations completed for this study are shown on the "Site and Exploration Plan," Figure 2. Interpretive exploration logs of the subsurface explorations completed for this study are included in the Appendix. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this study was to provide subsurface data to be used in the design and development of the above -referenced project. Our study included reviewing selected available geologic literature, advancing ten total exploration borings, and performing geologic studies to assess the type, thickness, distribution, and physical properties of the subsurface sediments and shallow groundwater. Geotechnical engineering studies were completed to formulate preliminary recommendations related to site preparation and grading, the type of suitable foundations and floors, allowable foundation soil bearing pressures, anticipated foundation and floor settlement, pavement recommendations, drainage considerations, and shallow infiltration feasibility. This report summarizes our current fieldwork and offers preliminary recommendations based on our present understanding of the project. We recommend that we be allowed to review the recommendations presented in this report and revise them, if needed, when a project design has been finalized. 1.2 Authorization We were authorized to proceed by means of an FWPS consultant agreement. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of FWPS and their agents for specific application to this project. Within the limitations of scope, schedule, and budget, our services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering and engineering geology practices in effect in this area at the time our report was prepared. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. June 6, 2018, Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215ED01-6-ProjeMI101801151KEIWP Page 1 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnica/ Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is that of the existing school campus located in Federal Way, Washington. The project site is comprised of a single rectangular parcel. The current site development includes a school campus with a single irregularly shaped large -sized building and several smaller portable buildings. Other site features include existing paved driveways, paved parking lots, walkways, sports fields, playfields, and utilities. Site topography is generally level in the vicinity of the existing school building with terraced parking areas located on the west side of the site. Slopes border the parcel on all sides and were likely created during the grading and leveling of the building pad and field areas. These slopes are discussed further in the "Geologic Hazards and Mitigations" section of this report. At the time this report was prepared, this project was in the conceptual planning stage. We anticipate that the project will include the construction of one or more new school buildings near the footprint of the existing school building. We also understand the project design is considering infiltration of stormwater runoff from new impervious areas. 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION Our field study included advancing four exploration borings completed on May 17, 2018, with a subsequent round of six exploration borings completed on August 1, 2018. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the explorations completed for this study. The number, locations, and depths of the explorations were completed within site and budgetary constraints. 3.1 Exploration Borings The exploration borings were completed by advancing hollow -stem auger tools with a truck -mounted drill -rig. During the drilling process, samples were obtained at generally 2%-foot- and 5-foot-depth intervals. The exploration borings were continuously observed and logged by a representative from our firm. The exploration logs presented in the Appendix are based on the field logs, drilling action, and observation of the samples secured. Disturbed, but representative samples were obtained by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-1586. This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch, outside -diameter, split -barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140-pound hammer free -falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6-inch interval is recorded, and the number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known as the Standard Penetration Resistance ("N") or blow count. If a total of 50 is recorded within one 6-inch June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProjeMJ20180115JKEJWP Page 2 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions interval, the blow count is recorded as the number of blows for the corresponding number of inches of penetration. The resistance, or N-value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils; these values are plotted on the attached exploration boring logs. The samples obtained from the split -barrel sampler were classified in the field and representative portions placed in watertight containers. The samples were then transported to our laboratory for further visual classification, as summarized in this report. 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of selected applicable geologic literature. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. The general distribution of geologic units is shown on the exploration logs. The explorations typically encountered Vashon-age native sediments consisting of dense grading to very dense lodgement till near the surface or underlying existing fill soils. Existing fill was encountered in explorations EB-3, 4, 5, 9, and 10 and extended to a maximum depth of approximately 16 feet below the surface. Review of a regional geologic map (Geologic Map of Poverty Bay Quadrangle ZYY King and Pierce Counties, Washington, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), prepared by Booth et al, 2004) indicates that the subject site is underlain by Vashon lodgement till. Our interpretation of the sediments encountered in our explorations is in general agreement with the regional geologic mapping. 4.1 Stratigraphy Grass/Topsoil A surficial layer of grass and organic topsoil was encountered at the locations of exploration borings EB-1, 3, 9, and 10. This organic layer ranged from approximately 3 to 6 inches in thickness. Observed topsoil thickness is shown on the attached subsurface exploration logs. Due to their high organic content, these materials are not considered suitable for foundation, roadway, slab -on -grade floor support, or for use in a structural fill. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180115E001-6-ProjedsJ10180115JKEJWP Page 3 Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way, Washington Fill Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Project and Site Conditions Surficial fill soils were observed in exploration boring EB-3, 4, 5, 9, and 10 to a maximum depth of 16 feet and was likely placed to establish grade for the terraced parking lots and level field area on the western portion of the campus. The existing fill generally consisted of loose to medium dense, very silty, fine sand, with variable amounts of gravel. The observed existing fill includes variable amounts of wood debris and other organic material. Existing fill is not considered suitable for foundation support and may require mitigation for pavement, or slab -on -grade floor support. Excavated existing fill material is suitable for reuse in structural fill applications if such reuse is specifically allowed by project plans and specifications, if excessively organic and any other deleterious materials are removed, and if moisture content is adjusted to allow compaction to the specified level and to a firm and unyielding condition. Based on our explorations completed for this study, we estimate the observed existing fill was above optimum moisture content for compaction purposes, and therefore may require drying during favorable weather prior to compaction in structural fill applications. Existing fill is not considered suitable for infiltration of stormwater runoff due to its high variability. Vashon Lodgement Till All ten of our explorations typically encountered dense grading to very dense, very silty to silty sand with gravel ranging to sandy silt with trace gravel, interpreted as Vashon lodgement till. Lodgement till encountered in our exploration borings extended beyond the maximum depth explored of 36.5 feet below existing ground surface. Lodgement till was deposited at the base of an active ice sheet and was subsequently compacted by the weight of the overlying glacial ice. Lodgement till typically possesses high -strength and low -compressibility attributes that are favorable for support of foundations, floor slabs, and paving with proper preparation. Lodgement till is silty and moisture -sensitive. In the presence of moisture contents above the optimum moisture content for compaction purposes, lodgement till can be easily disturbed by vehicles and earthwork equipment. Careful management of moisture -sensitive soils, as recommended in this report, will be needed to reduce the potential for disturbance of wet lodgement till soils and costs associated with repairing disturbed soils. Reuse of lodgement till in structural fill applications will require drying to within 1 to 2 percent of optimum moisture content during dry site and weather conditions. Vashon lodgement till is generally considered unsuitable for infiltration of stormwater runoff due to its high fine-grained content and low permeability. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProjeasJ20180215►KE►WP Page 4 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Project and Site Conditions 4.2 Hydrology Groundwater was observed in exploration EB-3 completed for this study at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface. The encountered groundwater seepage represents trapped groundwater within the glacial till. The groundwater encountered within the unweathered till does not represent the regional aquifer, but a discrete zone of trapped groundwater that may be hydraulically pressurized, which can result in lower density and higher moisture contents in the surrounding sediments. We also anticipate that perched groundwater consisting of interflow may be encountered during the wetter months. Interflow commonly occurs when surface water infiltrates down through relatively permeable soils, such as the existing fill or weathered lodgement till sediments, and becomes trapped or "perched" atop a comparatively impermeable barrier, such as the unweathered lodgement till sediments. Groundwater conditions, including depth and duration and quantity of seepage should be expected to vary seasonally, and in response to changes in precipitation, soil grain -size distribution, topography, on- and off -site land usage, and other factors. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProjectsJ201801151KEIWP Page 5 Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and shallow groundwater conditions as observed and discussed herein. 5.0 LANDSLIDE HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC) Section 19.05.070 defines Landslide Hazard Areas (LHA). Based on our review of the AHBL topographic survey, portions of the slopes along the east, south, and west perimeter of the project parcel qualify for treatment as a LHA. These slope configurations achieves both the minimum inclination of 40 percent and the minimum height of 10 feet that are needed for classification as a LHA. For protection from LHAs, the FWRC Section 19.145.230 requires a standard buffer of 50 feet from the top and toe of the LHA, which can be reduced with further geotechnical study. Explorations completed for this study show that the site slopes consist of dense, glacially consolidated sediments that are favorable from a slope stability standpoint when exposed at slope inclinations such as those at this site. The current project calls for a new school building in the general location of the existing school building which is distant from the steep slope areas. Based on our subsurface explorations, understanding of the project layout we anticipate that the new building will be located outside of the prescriptive LHA buffers. However, if LHA buffer reductions are needed for the new building or other improvements AESI can address this once a layout and project plans have been formulated. 6.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS Earthquakes occur regularly in the Puget Lowland. Most of these events are small and are not felt by people. However, large earthquakes do occur, as evidenced by the 2001, 6.8-magnitude event; the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event; and the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event. The 1949 earthquake appears to have been the largest in this region during recorded history and was centered in the Olympia area. Evaluation of earthquake return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within a given 20-year period. Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic events: 1) surficial ground rupture, 2) seismically induced landslides, 3) liquefaction, and 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed project is discussed below. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-PrajeMJ20180215JKEJWP Page 6 Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way, Washington 6.1 Surficial Ground Rupture Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations The project area is located approximately 15 miles south of the Seattle Fault Zone and within the mapped limits of the Tacoma Fault Zone. Our current understanding of the Seattle Fault suggests that several fault traces are spread across a relatively wide zone. Recent studies by the USGS (e.g., Johnson et al., 1994, Origin and Evolution of the Seattle Fault and Seattle Basin, Washington, Geology, v. 22, p. 71-74 and Johnson et al., 1999, Active Tectonics of the Seattle Fault and Central Puget Sound Washington - Implications for Earthquake Hazards, Geological Society of America Bulletin, July 1999, v. 111, n. 7, p. 1042-1053) have provided evidence of surficial ground rupture along a northern splay of the Seattle Fault. The recognition of this fault is relatively new, and data pertaining to it are limited, with the studies still ongoing. According to the USGS studies, the latest movement of this fault was about 1,100 years ago when about 20 feet of surficial displacement took place. This displacement can presently be seen in the form of raised, wave -cut beach terraces along Alki Point in West Seattle and Restoration Point at the south end of Bainbridge Island. The recurrence interval of movement along this fault system is still unknown, although it is hypothesized to be in excess of several thousand years. Geophysical surveys of the Puget Lowland in 1998 suggested the presence of a fault zone along the north side of the Tacoma basin generally between Tacoma and the south end of Hood Canal (Upper Crustal Structure in the Puget Lowland, Washington: Results from 1998 Seismic Hazards Investigation in Puget Sound, Journal of Geophysical research, v. 106, p. 13,541-13,564, by T.M. Brocher, T. Parsons, R.A. Blakely, N.I. Christiansen, M.A. Fisher, R.E. Wells, and SHIPS Working Group, 2001). More recent studies by the USGS have provided evidence of surficial ground rupture along the Tacoma Fault near Burly, Washington (The Catfish Lake Scarp, Allyn, Washington: Preliminary Field Data and Implications for Earthquake Hazards Posed by The Tacoma Fault, USGS Open -File Report 03-455, by B.L. Sherrod, A.R. Nelson, H.M. Kelsey, T.M. Brocher, R.J. Blakely, C.S. Weaver, N.K. Rountree, S.B. Rhea, and B.S. Jackson, 2003). The recognition of this fault is relatively new, and data pertaining to it is limited, with studies still ongoing. According to the USGS studies, the latest movement of this fault was about 1,100 years ago when several meters of surficial displacement took place. This displacement can presently be seen in the form of raised tidal flats in the Burly Lagoon, Lynch Bay, and North Cove, resulting in the present day freshwater marshes and forested lowlands. Further evidence of the faulting activity in this system has been seen at Wollochet Bay, where forested areas were inundated by water. Additionally, linear fault scarp features in the ground surface were exposed in recent Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) maps. The scarp features are located near Allyn, Washington, and have been described as trending parallel to the Tacoma Fault system. Studies also point to the fault system continuing across the Puget Sound, and it is inferred as continuing through Commencement Bay and the Puyallup River Delta. The slip rate along the Tacoma Fault is thought to be approximately 2 millimeters per year. However, very little is known about the recurrence interval of earthquakes along the Tacoma Fault. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180115E001-6-ProjeMJ20180115JKEJWP Page 7 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations Related fault systems in the Puget Sound region have been hypothesized to have reoccurrence intervals in excess of several thousand years. Due to the suspected long recurrence interval, the potential for surficial ground rupture is considered to be low during the expected life of the proposed development. No mitigation efforts beyond complying with the requirements of the local jurisdictions and the 2015 International Building Code (IBC) are recommended for this site. 6.2 Seismically Induced Landslides It is our opinion that the risk of damage to the proposed structures by seismically induced landsliding during a design -level seismic event is low. No quantitative slope stability analysis was completed, and none is warranted for the project as currently proposed, in our opinion. 6.3 Liquefaction Liquefaction is a temporary loss in soil shear strength that can occur when loose granular soils below the groundwater table are exposed to cyclic accelerations, such as those that occur during earthquakes. The observed site soils were relatively dense and unsaturated and are not expected to be prone to liquefaction. A detailed liquefaction hazard analysis was not performed as part of this study, and none is warranted, in our opinion. 6.4 Seismic Site Class (2015 International Building Code) In our opinion, the subsurface conditions at the site are consistent with seismic Site Class "C" in accordance with the 2015 IBC, and the publication ASCE 7 referenced therein, the most recent version of which is ASCE 7-10. 7.0 EROSION CONTROL The definition for Erosion Hazard Area is provide in Section 19.05.070(1) of the FWRC and is provided below. "Erosion hazard areas" are those areas identified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) as having a moderate to severe or severe to very severe rill and inter -rill erosion hazard due to natural agents such as wind, rain, splash, frost action or stream flow; those areas containing the following group of soils when they occur on slopes of 15 percent or greater. Alderwood-Kitsap ("AkF"), Alderwood gravelly sandy loam ("AgD"), Kitsap silt loam ("KpD"), Everett ("EVD"), and Indianola ("InD"); and those areas impacted by shore land and/or stream bank erosion. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProjeM1201802151KE1WP Page 8 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Geologic Hazards and Mitigations Review of the NRCS soil survey indicates that the majority of the site consists of Arents, Alderwood material of 0 to 6 and 6 to 15 percent slopes. A narrow portion of the east side of the site with dimension of approximately 100 feet wide by 600 feet long and oriented north -south along its longer axis is mapped as AgD, 15 to 30 percent slopes. This area appears to be associated with the east perimeter slope located just east of the gymnasium building. The Alderwood soil series is consistent with the glacial till soils encountered in several of our explorations. Based on review of the NRCS the area identified as AgD meets the criteria for erosion hazard. We have provided erosion mitigation recommendations in the following section. It is our opinion that if the recommendations provided in this report are followed that: • The project will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties or stormwater systems beyond predevelopment conditions, • The improvement will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties, and • The improvement will not adversely impact other critical areas. In order to reduce the amount of sediment transported off the site during construction, the following recommendations should be followed. • Silt fencing should be placed around the lower perimeter of all cleared area(s). The fencing should be periodically inspected and maintained as necessary to ensure proper function. • To the extent possible, earthwork -related construction should proceed during the drier periods of the year and disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Temporary erosion control measures should be maintained until permanent erosion control measures are established. • Areas stripped of vegetation during construction should be mulched and hydroseeded, replanted as soon as possible, or otherwise protected. During winter construction, hydroseeded areas should be covered with clear plastic to facilitate grass growth. • If excavated soils are to be stockpiled on the site for reuse, measures should be taken to reduce the potential for erosion from the stockpile. These could include, but are not limited to, covering the pile with plastic sheeting, the use of low stockpiles in flat areas, and the use of straw bales/silt fences around pile perimeters. • Interceptor swales with rock check dams should be constructed to divert stormwater from construction areas and to route collected stormwater to an appropriate discharge location. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProjectsJ20180215►KEIM Page 9 Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way, Washington Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Geologic Hazards and Mitigations ■ A rock construction entrance should be provided to reduce the amount of sediment transported off -site on truck tires. ■ All stormwater from impermeable surfaces, including driveways and roofs, should be tight -lined into approved facilities and not be directed onto or above steeply sloping areas. ■ Sediment track -out onto City streets shall be avoided. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProJectsj20180215jKEjWP Page 10 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations III. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 8.0 INTRODUCTION Our explorations indicate that, from a geotechnical engineering standpoint, the proposed project is feasible provided the recommendations contained herein are properly followed. In the vicinity of the proposed new building, our explorations encountered dense to very dense glacial soils near the existing grade or surficial existing fill soils ranging in depth from 1 foot to 16 feet below the surface. Existing fill is not suitable for support of new foundations or floor slabs and warrants remedial preparation where it occurs below paving and similar lightly loaded structures. The variable depth of existing fill observed in our explorations could be addressed by any of several alternative remedial preparation strategies. This report provides three different methods for addressing existing fill below the new building and are discussed further on the Foundations Section. We are available to answer questions as the District, design team, and cost -estimating consultant evaluate these alternatives. The following report sections provide additional recommendations regarding site preparation, structural fill, grading, foundations, floor support, drainage, and pavement recommendations. 9.0 SITE PREPARATION Site preparation of building and paving areas should include removal of all grass, trees, brush, debris, and any other deleterious materials. All existing fill beneath planned foundation areas should be removed. Buried utilities should be removed from planned foundation areas, and should be abandoned in place or removed from below planned new paving. Any depressions below planned final grades caused by demolition activities should be backfilled with structural fill, as discussed under the "Structural Fill" section of this report. Existing topsoil should be stripped from structural areas. The actual observed in -place depth of grass and topsoil at the exploration locations is presented on the exploration logs in the Appendix. After stripping, remaining roots and stumps should be removed from structural areas. All soils disturbed by stripping and grubbing operations should be recompacted as described below for structural fill. Once demolition and stripping has been completed, any existing fill under areas of new foundations should be addressed. We recommend that existing fill be addressed using one of the strategies described in further detail below. It is important to include remedial preparation of the existing fill in the bid documents in a way that encourages competitive pricing and reduces the potential for claims of unanticipated conditions. We are available to review project specification sections related to geotechnical issues if requested to do so. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProjecisJ20180215JKEJWP Page 11 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations Existing Fill Below New Building Option 1 - Removal and Replacement The simplest approach to addressing existing fill below structural areas is removal of the existing fill, and replacement of the existing fill with compacted structural fill. We recommend using this approach in areas where existing fill is expected to extend to depths no greater than 6 feet below existing grades. Existing Fill Below New Building Option 2 - Removal of Existinis Fill Below Foundation Elements, Partial Removal of Existine Fill Below Floors This approach would treat foundation areas the same as Option 1. Floor slab areas would be excavated 2 feet below floor slab grade, any organic or excessively yielding areas would be repaired, and floor slab grade would be restored with structural fill. Significant upfront cost savings would result as compared to Option 1, with the tradeoff being that higher risks of future settlement would also result. The magnitude of the potential for future floor slab settlement under this option is difficult to predict since conditions within existing fill that would be left in place are unknown. Exit Fill Below New Building Option 3 — Stone Columns This approach would use compacted stone columns below foundation elements to improve existing loose fill. We recommend using this approach in areas where existing fill thickness is greater than 6 feet below existing grades. The structure would then be constructed with conventional shallow foundations above a subgrade improved with stone columns. Stone Columns are flexible, in that they can be advanced to whatever depth is needed to penetrate existing fill, and therefore they are easily adapted to variable site conditions such as those that occur at this site. Stone Columns also have the advantage that the structure employs a conventional shallow foundation design without complexities associated with deep foundation approaches such as foundation piles. Stone columns are discussed in further detail in the "Foundations" Section. Existing Fill Below New Paving Below planned on -site paving, existing fill should be exposed, proof -rolled, and compacted to 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. If a firm and unyielding condition is achieved, no further remedial preparation would be needed. If excessively organic or yielding conditions are encountered, existing fill would be partially removed and replaced with imported structural fill. The depth of replacement of the existing fill below paving should be determined at the time of construction when field conditions are known. Alternatively, soil cement treatment could be used to complete remedial preparation of existing fill below planned new paving. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-Projects►20180215jKEjWP Page 12 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations 9.1 Temporary Cut Slopes In our opinion, stable construction slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor and should be determined during construction. For estimating purposes, however, temporary, unsupported cut slopes can be planned at 1.5H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) in unsaturated existing fill and weathered glacial till. Temporary slopes of 1H:1V can be planned in unsaturated, unweathered lodgement till. These slope angles are for areas where groundwater seepage is not present at the faces of the slopes. If ground or surface water is present when the temporary excavation slopes are exposed, flatter slope angles may be required. As is typical with earthwork operations, some sloughing and raveling may occur, and cut slopes may have to be adjusted in the field. In addition, WISHA/OSHA regulations should be followed at all times. 9.2 Site Drainage and Surface Water Control The site should be graded to prevent water from ponding in construction areas and/or flowing into excavations. Exposed grades should be crowned, sloped, and smooth drum -rolled at the end of each day to facilitate drainage. Accumulated water must be removed from subgrades and work areas immediately prior to performing further work in the area. Equipment access may be limited, and the amount of soil rendered unfit for use as structural fill may be greatly increased if drainage efforts are not accomplished in a timely sequence. If an effective drainage system is not utilized, project delays and increased costs could be incurred due to the greater quantities of wet and unsuitable fill, or poor access and unstable conditions. During construction, surface water should be routed away from the site slopes and conveyed to an appropriate discharge location. At no time should uncontrolled surface water flow onto the site slopes. Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the proposed new building at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or to collect adjacent to foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend that a gradient of at least 3 percent for a minimum distance of 10 feet from the building perimeters be provided, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of 1 percent should be provided, unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the additions. 9.3 Site Disturba Most of the on -site soils contain fine-grained material, which makes them moisture -sensitive and subject to disturbance when wet. The contractor must use care during site preparation June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-PrajectsJ20180215►KEJWP Page 13 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and the area brought to grade with structural fill. 9.4 Winter Construction The existing fill material and lodgement till contain substantial silt and are considered highly moisture -sensitive. Soils excavated onsite will likely require drying during favorable dry weather conditions to allow their reuse in structural fill applications. Care should be taken to seal all earthwork areas during mass grading at the end of each workday by grading all surfaces to drain and sealing them with a smooth -drum roller. Stockpiled soils that will be reused in structural fill applications should be covered whenever rain is possible. If winter construction is expected, crushed rock fill should be used to provide construction staging areas where exposed soil is present. The stripped subgrade should be observed by the geotechnical engineer, and should then be covered with a geotextile fabric, such as Mirafi 50OX or equivalent. Once the fabric is placed, we recommend using a crushed rock fill layer at least 10 inches thick in areas where construction equipment will be used. Soil cement treatment is another approach to providing a workable site during the winter. We are available to provide a more detailed cement -treatment plan on request and if allowed by the governing jurisdiction. 9.5 Frozen Subgrades If earthwork takes place during freezing conditions, all exposed subgrades should be allowed to thaw, and then be recompacted prior to placing subsequent lifts of structural fill or foundation components. Alternatively, the frozen material could be stripped from the subgrade to reveal unfrozen soil prior to placing subsequent lifts of fill or foundation components. The frozen soil should not be reused as structural fill until allowed to thaw and adjusted to the proper moisture content, which may not be possible during winter months. 10.0 STRUCTURAL FILL All references to structural fill in this report refer to subgrade preparation, fill type, placement, and compaction of materials, as discussed in this section. If a percentage of compaction is specified under another section of this report, the value given in that section should be used. For backfill of buried utilities in the right-of-way, the backfill should be placed and compacted in accordance with the City of Federal Way codes and standards. After stripping, planned excavation, and any required overexcavation have been performed to the satisfaction of the geotechnical engineer/engineering geologist, the surface of the exposed June 6, 2018, Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC TG/ms-180115EO01-6-ProjectsJ10180115%KEJWP Page 14 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations ground should be recompacted to a firm and unyielding condition. If the subgrade contains too much moisture, adequate recompaction may be difficult or impossible to obtain, and should probably not be attempted. In lieu of recompaction, the area to receive fill should be blanketed with washed rock or quarry spalls to act as a capillary break between the new fill and the wet subgrade. Where the exposed ground remains soft and further overexcavation is impractical, placement of an engineering stabilization fabric may be necessary to prevent contamination of the free -draining layer by silt migration from below. After recompaction of the exposed ground is tested and approved, or a free -draining rock course is laid, structural fill may be placed to attain desired grades. Structural fill is defined as non -organic soil, acceptable to the geotechnical engineer, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, with each lift being compacted to 95 percent of ASTM D-1557. The top of the compacted fill should extend horizontally outward a minimum distance of 3 feet beyond the locations of the perimeter footings or roadway edges before sloping down at a maximum angle of 2H:1V. The contractor should note that any proposed fill soils should be evaluated by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) prior to their use in fills. This would require that we have a sample of the material at least 72 hours in advance to perform a Proctor test and determine its field compaction standard. Soils in which the amount of fine-grained material (smaller than the No. 200 sieve) is greater than approximately 5 percent (measured on the minus No. 4 sieve size) should be considered moisture -sensitive. The existing fill and lodgement till soils encountered at the project site contain substantially more than 5 percent fine-grained material. Use of moisture -sensitive soil in structural fills should be limited to favorable dry weather and dry subgrade conditions. Construction equipment traversing the site when the soils are wet can cause considerable disturbance. If fill is placed during wet weather or if proper compaction cannot be obtained, a select import material consisting of a clean, free -draining gravel and/or sand should be used. Free -draining fill consists of non -organic soil, with the amount of fine-grained material limited to 5 percent by weight when measured on the minus No. 4 sieve fraction, and at least 25 percent retained on the No. 4 sieve. A representative from our firm should inspect the stripped subgrade and be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in -place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the earthwork may be evaluated as filling progresses, and any problem areas may be corrected at that time. It is important to understand that taking random compaction tests on a part-time basis will not assure uniformity or acceptable performance of a fill. As such, we are available to aid the Client in developing a suitable monitoring and testing program. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC TG/ms-180215EO01-6-ProjemJ20180115%KEJWP Page 15 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations 11.0 FOUNDATIONS Our explorations generally encountered existing fill soils overlying dense glacial, native sediments in the vicinity of the existing school building and fields. The existing fill extended to depths that ranged from a few feet up to 16 feet below the surface. Conventional spread footings may be used in areas where relatively shallow depths of fill soils were encountered. In areas where thicker fills are present, it may be more economical to support new foundations on a deeper foundation system. We have provided options for stone columns below. Once a building layout has been finalized, we recommend that we are able to review the layout and update our recommendations or complete more explorations to determine suitable foundation type, if necessary. 11.1 Spread Footings Conventional spread footings and column pads may be used for building support when founded either directly on the undisturbed, dense to very dense native sediments or on new structural fill placed above the suitable native deposits. We recommend that an allowable foundation soil bearing pressure of 3,500 pounds per square foot (psf) be utilized for design purposes, including both dead and live loads. If foundations are underlain by very dense lodgement till or Vashon advance outwash alone, these native sediments and CDF, or on a subgrade improved by stone columns, an allowable foundation soil bearing pressure of 5,000 psf should be used for design. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. Foundation areas should be deepened, if necessary, to expose sediments suitable for the support of the recommended bearing pressures. An increase of one-third may be used for short-term wind or seismic loading. It should be noted that the area bounded by lines extending downward at 1H:1V from any footing must not intersect another footing or filled area. In addition, a 1.5H:1V line extending down from any footing must not daylight because sloughing or raveling may eventually undermine the footing. Thus, footings should not be placed near the edge of steps or cuts in the bearing soils. Perimeter footings should be buried at least 18 inches into the surrounding soil for frost protection. However, all footings must penetrate to the prescribed bearing stratum, and no footing should be founded in or above organic or loose soils. Anticipated settlement of footings founded as recommended should be less than 1 inch with differential settlement one-half of the anticipated total settlement. Most of this movement should occur during initial dead load applications. However, disturbed soil not removed from footing or mat excavations prior to concrete placement could result in increased settlements. All footing areas should be observed by AESI prior to placing concrete to verify that the design June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EWI-6-Projects%201802151KEIWP Page 16 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations bearing capacity of the soils has been attained and that construction conforms to the recommendations contained in this report. Such observation may be required by the City of Federal Way. A perimeter foundation drain system should be provided as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. The contractor must use care during site preparation and excavation operations so that the underlying soils are not softened. If disturbance occurs, the softened soils should be removed and foundations extended down to competent natural soil. Once the base of the excavation is reached, consideration should be given to "armoring" the exposed subgrade with a thin layer of rock to provide a working surface during_foundation construction. We recommend a 6-inch layer of crushed rock for this purpose. 11.2 Stone Columns Stone columns consist of columns of compacted crushed rock below the building pad. Installation of stone columns results in significant densification of the surrounding soils, as well as a network of compacted stone columns that transmit loads directly to more competent soils at depth. There is little consistency between different contractors who install stone columns with respect to their installation equipment and methods. The diameters, depth capability, compactive energy, and other critical factors of each contractor's equipment must be considered when designing a stone column foundation system, and therefore such systems are typically designed by the contractor who installs them. Once stone columns are installed, the building is constructed with a conventional shallow foundation system above a subgrade that has been improved through installation of stone columns. In our opinion, using a system of stone columns, it would be possible to achieve an allowable foundation soil bearing pressure of 5,000 psf. 11.3 Drainage Considerations Foundations should be provided with foundation drains. Drains should consist of rigid, perforated, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe surrounded by washed pea gravel. The drains should be constructed with sufficient gradient to allow gravity discharge away from the proposed building. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system, but should be handled by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. In planning, exterior grades adjacent to walls should be sloped downward away from the proposed building to achieve surface drainage. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215EO01-6- Projects 1201802151KEIWP Page 17 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations 12.0 FLOOR SUPPORT Floor slabs can be supported on suitable native sediments, on structural fill placed above suitable native sediments, or above at least 2 feet of new structural fill as outlined in the "Site Preparation" section of this report. Floor slabs should be cast atop a minimum of 4 inches of clean, washed, crushed rock, or pea gravel to act as a capillary break. Areas of subgrade that are disturbed (loosened) during construction should be compacted to a non -yielding condition prior to placement of capillary break material. Floor slabs should also be protected from dampness by an impervious moisture barrier at least 10 mils thick. The moisture barrier should be placed between the capillary break material and the concrete slab. 13.0 FOUNDATION WALLS All backfill behind foundation walls or around foundation units should be placed as per our recommendations for structural fill and as described in this section of the report. Horizontally backfilled walls, which are free to yield laterally at least 0.1 percent of their height, may be designed to resist lateral earth pressure represented by an equivalent fluid equal to 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Fully restrained, horizontally backfilled, rigid walls that cannot yield should be designed for an equivalent fluid of 50 pcf. Walls with sloping backfill up to a maximum gradient of 2H:1V should be designed using an equivalent fluid of 55 pcf for yielding conditions or 75 pcf for fully restrained conditions. If parking areas are adjacent to walls, a surcharge equivalent to 2 feet of soil should be added to the wall height in determining lateral design forces. As required by the 2015 IBC, retaining wall design should include a seismic surcharge pressure in addition to the equivalent fluid pressures presented above. Considering the site soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we recommend a seismic surcharge pressure of 5H and 10H psf, where H is the wall height in feet for the "active" and "at -rest" loading conditions, respectively. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular distribution with the resultant applied at the midpoint of the walls. The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill consisting of excavated on -site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of ASTM D-1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended, as this will increase the pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab -on -grade or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be provided for all retaining walls, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of this report. June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180115E001-6-Projects1101801151KEIWP Page 18 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnicol Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum 1-foot-wide blanket drain to within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against the walls. 13.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural soils or supporting structural fill soils, and by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. We recommend the following allowable design parameters which include a factor of safety of 1.5: • Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf ■ Coefficient of friction = 0.35 14.0 SHALLOW INFILTRATION FEASIBILITY Generally, our explorations encountered Vashon lodgement till near the surface or underlying a layer of existing fill soils. In all ten of our exploration borings, the Vashon lodgement till extended beyond the depths explored. Existing fill soils are not considered suitable for use as an infiltration receptor due to their variability. Vashon lodgement till is also considered not suitable for use as an infiltration receptor due to its high fine-grained content and low permeability. In our opinion, shallow infiltration is not considered feasible at the project site. Our study included a deeper exploration boring (EB-2) to investigate the feasibility of deeper infiltration strategies. EB-2 extended to a depth of 36.5 feet and did not encounter a suitable infiltration receptor unit. 15.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The pavement sections included in this report section are for driveway and parking areas onsite, and are not applicable to right-of-way improvements. At this time, we are not aware of any planned right-of-way improvements; however, if any new paving of public streets is required, we should be allowed to offer situation -specific recommendations. Pavement areas should be prepared in accordance with the "Site Preparation" section of this report. If the stripped native soil or existing fill pavement subgrade can be compacted to 95 percent of ASTM D-1557 and is firm and unyielding, no additional overexcavation is June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProjedsJ201802151KEIM Page 19 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations required. Soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated to provide a suitable subgrade and backfilled with structural fill. The upper 2 feet of pavement subgrade should be recompacted to 95 percent of ASTM D-1557. If required, structural fill may then be placed to achieve desired subbase grades. We anticipate the interior parking lot and aisles will be subject to light traffic loads from passenger vehicles driving and parking. In these light traffic load areas, we recommend a pavement section consisting of 3 inches of Class %-inch hot -mix asphalt (HMA) underlain by 4 inches of crushed surfacing base course (CSBC) that meets Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specification 9-03.9(3). Additionally, we anticipate that select areas of pavement onsite will encounter heavier loading from buses, fire trucks, garbage trucks, along with passenger vehicles. In these heavy traffic areas, a minimum pavement section consisting of 4 inches of Y2 inch HMA underlain by 6 inches of CSBC is recommended. The crushed rock courses must be compacted to 95 percent of the maximum density, as determined by ASTM D-1557. All paving materials should meet gradation criteria contained in the current Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications. Depending on construction staging and desired performance, the crushed base course material may be substituted with asphalt treated base (ATB) beneath the final asphalt surfacing. The substitution of ATB should be as follows: 4 inches of crushed rock can be substituted with 3 inches of ATB, and 6 inches of crushed rock may be substituted with 4 inches of ATB. ATB should be placed over a native or structural fill subgrade compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative density, and a 2-inch thickness of crushed rock to act as a working surface. If ATB is used for construction access and staging areas, some rutting and disturbance of the ATB surface should be expected. The general contractor should remove affected areas and replace them with properly compacted ATB prior to final surfacing. Concrete Pavement Section A concrete pavement section for a heavy traffic load area, such as near trash enclosures, should consist of a 7-inch concrete slab. The concrete slab should be cast on 6 inches of CSBC. The crushed surfacing base course placed on firm and unyielding soil subgrade compacted to at least 95 percent of the soil's maximum dry density per ASTM D-1557. Concrete pavement should be cast using Portland cement concrete (PCC) with a minimum compressive strength of 4,000 pounds per square inch (psi) at 28 days. The concrete pavement should contain Grade 40 steel No. 4 bars placed at a maximum of 24 inches on center in two perpendicular directions. The bars should be placed within the upper one-half of the slab with at least 2 inches of concrete cover. We recommend crack control joints at locations that are aesthetically acceptable, and which achieve a joint spacing of 12 feet on center or closer. To lessen fatigue and damage to the free edges of PCC paving slabs at any concrete/asphalt June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TGlms-180115E001-6-ProjecftJ20180215JKEJWP Page 20 Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Preliminary Geotechnicol Engineering Report Federal Way, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations transitions, we recommend thickening of the edge of the slabs to 12 inches. We recommend that AESI inspect the soil and crushed rock surfacing subgrades prior to concrete placement. 16.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MONITORING Our report is preliminary since only a preliminary project concept was available at the time this report was prepared. We recommend that we be allowed to review project plans when they are completed and to revise the recommendations presented in this report as needed. We are also available to provide geotechnical engineering and monitoring services during construction. The integrity of the foundation system depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. In addition, engineering decisions may have to be made in the field in the event that variations in subsurface conditions become apparent. Construction monitoring services are not part of our currently approved scope of work. We have enjoyed working with you on this study and are confident these recommendations will aid in the successful completion of your project. If you should have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington yler Gilsdorf, G.LT., CESCL Senior Staff Geoloeist 4; Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2: Site and Exploration Plan Appendix: Exploration Logs June 6, 2018; Revised April 10, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. TG/ms-180215E001-6-ProjedsJ20180215�KEJWP Page 21 f1 �• __. �I � ',� � � —+ �•' 1 # � - I.... ram,, .• /.cr I 1, � 1 .I 99 f Ca pa* ' I r ,�r SITE _ l 09 Jr1iuih Pa I J ! fl ''-i r. �1 ` Suet Lake ! _',=_�=�__ � f.. �? � �•� �+,�` STET ,�i ref �' �/ •r_ •1 � �� � �� \ � i r $ .rM1 s� Rg�t i II jj SIeei ta1Ce s� ` l S 300tn St .# x i� ril ei �. M ■ Dili •_�., 1 �t . • f • {� � ` 4 o / 1 T 1 • ,r ff 11 4 �1Q Copynghi: 201 NatianaliG D r p s . iety •cybed a f Snohomish County a s s o c i a t e s N earth sciences r Aa King,County. Q 0 1000 2000 A VICINITY MAP FEET a W DATA SOURCES/ REFERENCES: WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL i USGS: 7.5' SERIES TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS, ESRI/I-CUBEDINGS 2013 NOTE: BLACK AND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON E KING CO: STREETS, PARCELS, CITY LIMITSI/18 ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE ITS EFFECTIVENESS AND LEAD TO PROJ NO. DATE: FIGURE: LOCATIONS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE INCORRECT INTERPRETATION 180215EO01 5/18 1 1 41 V ------ ----- LEGEND: OEB EXPLORATION BORING-AESI 5118 @EB EXPLORATION BORING-AESI 8118 w4 CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1' —�, NOTE: LOCATION AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. NOTES: 1 BASE MAP REFERENCE: AHBL, WILDWDOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, SHEETS 2, 3, 4, AND 5, 5mma BUCKAND WHITE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLDR ORIGINAL MAY REDUCE IB EFFECTNENESSAND LEAD TO INCORRECT INTERPFMTATION_ S S S O C I S E B d earth sciences i n c o r p o r a I e d SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON NO GATE: I FIGURE: 180215EO01 8/181 2 APPENDIX Exploration Logs U a a N a 0 J 0 Classifications of soils in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and g plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual -manual and/or laboratory classification methods of ASTM D-2487 and D-2488 were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. ° °�,° ° Well -graded gravel and Terms Describing Relative Density and Consistency LL o o GW gravel with sand, little to Dens SPTIZIblows/foot 4) o no fines Coarse- Very Loose 0 to 4 d W> v y ae W Loose 4 to 10 Grained Soils Medium Dense 10 to 30 Test Symbols 0 0 0 0 0 00000 GP Poorly -graded gravel in 0 00000 and gravel with sand, Dense 30 to 50 O c 6 d 00000 0,000 little to no fines Very Dense >50 G = Grain Size a ° o z Lo c 00°o° l2 M = Moisture Content Consistency SPT tblows/foot A = Atterber Limits g . a z c m (1) �, a n GM Silty gravel and silty gravel with sand Very Soft 0 to 2 C=Chemical Fine- �, ° Soft 2 to 4 DID = Dry Density Grained Soils LL Medium Stiff 4 to 8 K = Permeability co al' Stiff 8 to 15 w Clayey gravel and Very Stiff 15 to 30 rn "" GC clayey gravel with sand Hard >30 o Component Definitions c`a c Well -graded sand and Descriptive Term Size Range and Sieve Number w B SWy sand with gravel, little Boulders Larger than 12' 0 T to no fines Cobbles 3'to 12' ' :o d " ' ' ' Poorly -graded sand Gravel 3'to No. 4 (4.75 mm) rn o U 2 w, ._ _- SP and sand with gravel, Coarse Gravel 3'to 3/4' Fine Gravel 3/4'to No. 4 (4.75 mm) a c c v B c little to no fines Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) z Coarse Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 10 (2.00 mm) SM Silty sand and Medium Sand No. 10 (2.00 mm) to No. 40 (0.425 mm) c ;' silty sand with gravel Fine Sand No. 40 (0.425 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) �j .; :.:, Silt and Clay Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) in c SIC Clayey sand and (3) Estimated Percentage Moisture Content clayey sand with gravel Component Percentage by Weight Dry - Absence of moisture, Trace <5 dusty, dry to the touch Blighty Moist - Perceptible Silt, sandy silt, gravelly silt, ML silt with sand or gravel Some 5 to <12 moisture > ) Moist - Damp but no visible 14 Modifier 12 to <30 water Clay of low to medium N U (silty, sandy, gravely) Very Moist - Water visible but c ICL plasticity; silty, sandy, or not free draining w gravelly clay, lean Clay Very modifier 30 to <50 Wet -Visible free water, usually N (silty, sandy, gravely) from below water table a = Organic clay or silt of low Symbols N --• OL plasticity Blows/6' or 2 —= Sampler portion of 6' Cement grout `o Type �. f surface seal Elastic silt, clayey silt, sift 2.0.yp Sampler Typo o c MH with micaceous or ,O Split -Spoon ,5 t7escritstinn Bentonite seal o diatomaceous fine sand or sift � Sampler 3.0' OD Split -Spoon Sam ler - p = :. Fifterpackwith o rn m `o (SPA ! 3.25' OD Split -Spoon Ring Sampler (4) ; := ': blank casing Clay of high plasticity, L) C c � CH sandy or gravelly Clay, fat Bulk sample 3.0' OD Thin -Wall Tube Sampler =Screened section casing `— B 1D E w � claywith sand or ravel 9 (including Shelby tube) : ' or HydrotQ with filter pack Grab Sample End cap LL J fff�f�f�� Organic clay or silt of ❑ Portion not recovered OH medium to high lit Percentage by dry weight (4) Depth of round water p g plasticity let (SPT) Standard Penetration Test {ASTM D-1586} Z ATD = At time of drilling Static water level (date) (3) In General Accordance >, •E o �, Peat, muck and other I _ , o, fo PT highly organic soils with Standard Practice for Description ts) Combined USCS symbols used for and Identification of Soils (ASTM D-2488) fines between 5% and 12% a s s o c i a t e d earth sciences i n c o r p o r a t e d EXPLORATION LOG KEY FIGURE Al associated Ex IorationLo e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorperated 180215EO01 EB-1 1of1 Project Name Wildwood Elementary School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 493 Location federal Way, WA Datum Driller/Equipment EDI /Truck Rig Date Start/Finish 5117118 5117118 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 13.[j° _ _ _ _ Hole Diameter (in) _8 jnCbeS £ 2 a U 'm E O °� a > 3 Blows/Foot iq aai S W 0 r i E o m T �' DESCRIPTION U 1p 3 m 10 20 30 40 L_ Grass Turf ! Tqpsoll - 6 Incites Weathered Vashon Lodgement Till Rough drilling 6 inches to 1 foot. Moist, brown to light reddish brown, fine SAND, some silt, trace ravel; g i4 1 minor organics; driller noted pounding on rock (SP-SM). Vashon Lodgement Till 5 5 2 Harder drilling observed at 4 feet. Moist, gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace grave; unsorted (SM). 5Wd- - 10 S-3 Moist, light brownish gray to gray, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 36 -X unsorted (SM). Tough drilling observed -12 to 13 feet with abundant gravel. - 15 3-4 :; Moist, light brown to light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). Bottom d exploration boring at 15.5 feet - No groundwater encountered. - 20 - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: TG m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample �Z Water Level() Approved by: dHS Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample-T Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) e ss O Gia t e d Exploration Log e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet inoorporated 180215EO01 EB-2 1of1 Project Name 3ffidwood Elementary srbod Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 492 Location Datum 99 _NGVD Driller/Equipment EDI I Truro 13ig Date Start/Finish 5117118 5117118 Hammer WelghtlDrop 140# 130" Hole Diameter (in) 8 inrhea r d a _ :12 C E c 2 °� a 6 1 J 6 3 Blows/Foot .4 to H a S E E2 >, tO to i m t o T DESCRIPTION c " ° 10 20 30 40 :a Asphalt - 4 Inches Crushed Rock Material - 4 Inches Vashon Lodgement Till $-1 :; _ Moist to very moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 6 t.unsorted; top 6 inches of sampler is wet (SM). 18 39 21 5 S-2 '- Moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, some ravel; unsorted 9 9 Y, ry ty, 9 0 .' (SM). '50/ - 10 S-3 Moist, light brown to light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; 19 unsorted (SM). - 15 S-4 - As above. 25 . 3s soy - 20 S-5 ': ' Moist, light brownish gray, v g 9 Y, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted �2 (SM) Very gravelly drilling observed -21 to 25 feet. - 25 S-6 . ' As above. - 30 Moist, light brown to light brownish gray, sandy, SILT, trace gravel; ranges 10 S-7 to very silty, sand; unsorted (ML-SM)- 19 A 153 34 - 35 Driller added water to aid in drilling- S-8 : • . As above. 19 Bottom of exploration boring at 36.5 feet No groundwater encountered. Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) 0 No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: TG 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Q Water Level() Approved by: JHS ® Grab Sample Z Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Lg e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-3 1of1 Project Name WjldWQd"lemenialy School _ Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 49 Location Fedeml Way, WA Datum NGVD 29 Driller/Equipment Date Start/Finish 5117118 5117118 _ Hammer Weight/Drop _ ° Hole Diameter (in) Uy1Ch r w a U p a� O - m f0 w+ Blows/Foot H a p S E T mT ;°�4yo �o mm r DESCRIPTION " ° 10 20 30 40 Grass Turf - 3 €notes FlII Hard drilling observed at 1.5 feet. _ _ u i _ Vashon Lodgement TIII S 1 •: Moist, light brownish gray, very sitty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted 11 (SM). 24 A 668 Gravelly drilling observed 4 to 5 feet. 44 5 S-2 ' ' Moist, light brownish gray to light gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; 37 • • unsorted (SM)- 0/ 501 ' - 10 S� ':, Moist light brown to light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; �� unsorted; ranges to very silty; driller noted pounding on rock (SM). - 15 S-4 Very moist to wet, light brown to light brownish gray, sandy, SILT, trace 716 rave1, unsorted; sampler €s wet; layers (-1 inch thick] of silt and sandy silt •3 25 20 Moist, light brown, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 21 36 4684 48 Bottom of exploration boring at 21-5 feet Perched groundWer encountered at 15 feet. - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: TG 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Q Water Level () Approved by: JHS ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Lo earth sciences Project Number Exploration Number Sheet i n c o r p c r a t e d 180215EO01 J EB-4 1of1 Project Name-W-ildwood Elementary School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 492 _ Location Federal Way, WA Datum Driller/Equipment Date StattlFinish _511_7118 5/17-118 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 130" Hole Diameter (in) A innhes L n C C m E °1 CL Blows/Foot �� 30 t p T DESCRIPTION U Mm 3 ° 10 20 30 40 Asphalt - 5 Inches Fill S-1 Moist to very moist, light brownish gray to gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace 2 gravel; minor organics (SM). 2 •11 9 _ 5 S-2 Moist, light gray to dark brown, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; minor 3 organics; low recovery due to soft material (SM). 6 �1 i 10 - 10 Very moist, brown to dark brown with minor oxidation, very silty, fine 2 S-3 ; :' SAND, trace gravel; wood debris and organics in sampler (SM). 3 3 Wood debris and small organics in drill cuttings. — — — — — — — - _ _ _ Vashon Lodgement TIII Slightly tougher drilling observed at 13.5 feet. - 15 1 S-4 - Moist, light gray to gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). 5a Very tough drilling observed at 16 feet. - 20 S-5 ' • Moist, light gray to light brown, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 22 - unsorted; ranges to sand silt SM-ML . 0� Boltorn of exploration boring at 21 feet No groundwater er=untered. - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): 2` OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: TG 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample SZ Water Level Q Approved by: JHS ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) B Ss O cl a fed Exploration Log e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-5 1Of1 Project Name Ground Surface Elevation (ft) -486 Location Datum NGVD 9q _ Driller/Equipment Environmental Drilling Inc. I Truck Mouthed Drill_ Date Start/Finish Hammer Weight/Drop _1� 130" Hole Diameter (in) 75 w a V p '2 E O 4) 6` 3 Blows/Foot y o T ern �c r DESCRIPTION to ° 10 20 30 40 Asphalt - 2 inches Fill S"1 Moist, light brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; minor 13 organics (SM). 10 ■1 6 5 S-2 Moist to very moist, slightly oxidized dark brown to gray, silty, fine SAND, 4 trace to some gravel; minor organics (wood debris) (SM). 3 A10 7 Moist to very moist, slightly oxidized brown to dark brown, silty, fine SAND, 2 S-3 •' trace to some gravel; occasional organics (woody debris) (SM). 2 A4 Vashon Lodgement Till 2 - 10 Driller notes tougher drilling at 9 feet. �4 ;: ;:: Moist to slightly moist, brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some 26 gravel; unsorted (SM). 18 55 37 - 15 S-5 :: Moist, gray to grayish brown, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel, ranging to 24 sandy, SILT; unsorted (SM-ML). Very tough drilling observed at 17 feet with abundant gravel. - 20 Moist, brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 19 S-6 37 59 - 222 Bottom of exploration boring at 21.5 feet No groundwater encountered. - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) Q No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U. Ring Sample Q Water Level Q Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample-T Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Lo e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-6 1Of1 Project Name Wildwood Elementary School _ Ground Surface Elevation (ft) -491 Location federal Way. WA Datum NrVn 99 Driller/Equipment Environmental Drilling Inc. / Trurk Mg lnted Drill Date Start/Finish Hammer Weight/Drop 140# Z30" Hole Diameter (in) 75 ? a U � C E m n N 3 Blows/Foot H o T� [? cn :?� E a; o am r DESCRIPTION c U m ° 10 20 30 40 Asphalt - 2.5 inches Vashon Lodgement Till Difficult drilling 0.5 to 2 feet. 5 Moist, brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some ravel; unsorted SM 26 0/ 501T Tough drilling and abundant gravel at 7 feet. - 10 S-2 _ Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted; rocks at 0/ 5py top of sampler [SM). Switched to cat ead 1401b hammer at 10 feet. Very tough drilling and abundant gravel at 11 feet. - 15 S-3 : _ Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 42 01 5it1 - 20 S-4 As above, poorrecovery. r 501• Bottom of exploration boring at 20.5 feet No groundwater encountered. - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) 1] Ring Sample �Z Water Level() Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Log earth sciences Project Number Exploration Number Sheet Incorporated 180215EO01 EB-7 1of1 Project Name Wildwood Elementlary 5rhQQI Ground Surface Elevation (ft) -490 Location _Fedeml Way,_WA Datum NGV6-c Driller/Equipment Environmental Drilling Inc. / Truck Mounted Drill Date Start/Finish Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 30" Hole Diameter (in) 75 v w N a U 5 CL _ O> � -J Blows/Foot w W H 0 T co '0 � o m t DESCRIPTION L 10 20 30 40 0 Asphalt - 2 Inches Weathered Vashon Lodgementiill cw1 Moist, grayish fight brown, fine SAND, some silt, some gravel; unsorted 18 (SM). 48 66 5 S-2 _ u _ 4 u 4 y T Vashon Lodgement Till Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel ranging to fine SAND, some silt, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). S'3 ;. Moist, light brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted 2. 5" (SM). - 10 = S-4 _ Moist to very moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted; rock in spoon (SM). - 15 T S-5 Moist, light brownish gray, silty to very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 0� 1501d. unsorted (SM). Difficult drilling and abundant gravel observed at 17 feet. 20 S-6 - Moist, gray. silty, fine SAND, some ravel; unsorted (SIN). Awl. Bottom of exploration boring at 20.25 feet No groundwater encountered. - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): 2" 0D Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m 3" 0D Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample -7 Water Level () Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) sssueialad Exploration Lo e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet in c o r p o r a t e d 180215EO01 EB-8 1of1 Project Name Ground Surface Elevation (ft) —493 Location Federal Yvay, Datum Driller/Equipment Inc. I Truck Mounted Urill Date Start/Finish Hammer Weight/Drop 140# 3" Hole Diameter (in) 75 to CL V p L O > °' Blows/Foot y S E 1! a� d T o in CoDESCRIPTION 3 10 20 30 40 ° Asphalt - 2 Inches Weathered Vashon LndgementTlil Difficult drilling at 2 feet. 5 S-1 Moist, brown to brownish gray with minor oxidation, silty, fine SAND, trace 22 gravel; minor organics; unsorted; poor recovery; rootlets in gray, silty, fine 21 A32 sand (SM). 11 10 S_2 ----.-_-------Ladgame-- ---__----- Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). CIE - - 15 S-3 As above, poor recovery. Bottom of exi)bmtlon baring at 15.25 feet No groundwater encountered. - 20 - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m T OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample Q Water Level () Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Lo e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215E001 EB-9 1Of1 Project Name YVjIdwgQd Elementary 9chool Ground Surface Elevation (ft) --490 _ Location Datum NGVD 29 Driller/Equipment Date Start/Finish 811118,811118 Hammer Weight/Drop n Hole Diameter (in) a I.d n, 3 Blows/Foota)T S E E, �� �'o CD mm t DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 40 Grass Turf - 3 Inches j Fill S-1 Moist to very moist, brown with slight iron oxidized staining, fine SAND, 18 5 Some silt, trace gravel; mirror organics (rootlets) (SM). 7 4,11 4 10 S'2 Very moist, darts brawn to grayish brown, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel ranging to SILT, some sand; minor organics (woody debris) (SM-ML). 32 �2 19 6 S� :. ---------- ---ashon Lodgement Till ----- --- Moist, light brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted 15 (SM). Difficult drill action at 14 feet. Very difficult drill action at 18 feet. S 4 Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). - 20 Difficult drilling and abundant gravel observed at 20 feet. S-5 As above, trace ravel, poor recove - 25 ._ gpngm of eWloration boring at 24.25 feet No growxhWer encountered. - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Q Water Level () Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample E] Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated EX lorationLo e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215E001 EB-10 1of1 Project Name Wildwood Elementary SchoQ1 Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 493 Location Federal Wad. )NA Datum _NGVr) 99 Driller/Equipment EnvirQnmerftFling Inc. I Truck_ Mounted Drill Date Start/Finish 811118 811118 Hammer Weight/Drop 140#,30" Hole Diameter (in) _ 75 _ i L d a =. O J i0 N Blows/Foot � a S E mE 0 T iU CO c in r DESCRIPTION U 10 20 30 40 ° Grass Turf - 3 inches Fill Driller notes large rock at 1 foot. 5 S-1 Moist, brown to bluish ray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; minor organics ?SM). 23 •' mostly in top 6 inches 20 40 20 Difficult drilling 7 to 8 feet. - 10 S-2 Moist to very moist, dark brown to dark gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 31 minor organics (rootlets and woody debris in sampler tip); unsorted (SM). 2D 31 11 15 S-3 Moist to very moist, brownish to bluish gray, silty to very silty, fine SAND, trace transitioning to sil fine SAND, some minor organics 6 WI gravel gravel; at bottom 3 inches of sam ler 5M . a Vashon Lodgement III Moist, Ilght brownish fine SAND, - gray, silty some gravel (SM). Difficult drilling feet. at 17 - 20 S 4 • • • • Moist, brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). 5iN 25 S-5 ' • Moist, brownish gray, silty. gravellyfine SAND; unsorted (SM). Bottom of exploration booi g at 25.5 feel No gmndwaler ermuntered. - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) L Ring Sample �-Z Water Level() Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample Z Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) a s s o c i a t e d earth sciences i n c o r p o r a t e d June 14, 2019 Project No. 180215E001 Federal Way Public Schools 1211 South 332"d Street Federal Way, Washington 98003 Attention: Mr. Ray Vefik Subject: Geotechnical Permit Review Comment Response Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Federal Way, Washington Dear Mr. Vefik: JUN 2 4 2019 Ay L MJ �ITY DEV OF FEDERALPA ENT The purpose of this letter is to respond to a City of Federal Way request for geotechnical comment regarding the proposed underground StormTech chambers at Wildwood Elementary School. Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) was provided with the following plan review comment from the design team. 2. The geotechnical report states that these are Fill soils on this site. Have the geotechnical engineer establish where fill soils are within the footprint of the detention facility. Per Section 5.1.3.1 of the King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWD), provide an analysis for the stability and constructability of the detention facility in fill soils as necessary. We reviewed a grading and drainage plan set for Wildwood Elementary School, dated March 28, 2019, for preparation of this letter. The plan set shows several rows of underground StormTech chambers located north of the proposed school building in the north -central portion of the site. Plans show a bottom of foundation stone elevation for the StormTech system of approximately 480 feet. Explorations completed by AESI at the project site include 10 exploration borings (EB-1 through EB-10). Logs and interpretive observations of subsurface conditions are presented in our report titled "Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report, Wildwood Elementary School Replacement," dated June 6, 2018, and revised April 10, 2019. Copies of our "Site and Exploration Plan" (Figure 2), and copies of the logs of selected explorations discussed below were excerpted from the referenced report and attached to this letter. Kirkland Office 1911 Fifth Avenue I Kirkland, WA 98033 P 1425.827.7701 Mount Vernon Office 1 508 S. Second Street, Suite 1011 Mount Vernon, WA 98273 P 1425.827.7701 Tacoma Office 11552 Commerce Street, Suite 102 1 Tacoma, WA 98402 P 1253.722.2992 www.aesgeo.com Explorations EB-1, EB-5, EB-6, and EB-7 were completed in the vicinity of the proposed StormTech system. The only exploration boring completed in the area of the proposed StormTech system that encountered existing fill was EB-5. EB-5 was completed at a location with an existing ground surface elevation of approximately 486 feet and encountered approximately 9 feet of existing fill with an approximate elevation at the base of the fill of 477 feet, approximately 3 feet deeper than the proposed StormTech base rock elevation of 480 feet. EB-1, EB-6, and EB-7 were completed at locations with existing ground surface elevations of approximately 490 feet and encountered dense native soils and no existing fill. Everywhere except at the location of EB-5 we anticipate that StormTech chambers will be fully embedded into native sediments which are suitable for bearing. At the location of EB-5 we anticipate localized removal and replacement of existing fill where it occurs below the StormTech system. In areas where existing fill is removed, the planned subgrade elevation for the StormTech system and underlying rock would be restored in using compacted structural fill suitable for support of the StormTech system. Native and structural fill soils are not suitable for use as infiltration receptors, in our opinion and the StormTech system should be assumed not to infiltrate. We recommend that the excavation for the StormTech system be lined with an impermeable liner at least 30 mils thick. We hope this information meets your present requirements. Please contact the undersigned at (425) 827-7701 should you have any questions. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington FGrsrf�E° � AL. F��� Bruce W. Guenzler, L.E.G. Kurt D. Merriman, P.E. Associate Geologist Senior Principal Engineer Attachments: Figure 2: Site and Exploration Plan Exploration Logs: EB-1, EB-5, EB-6, EB-7 KDM/ms-180215E001-8 - Projects\20180215\KE\W P 2 1 � I-- — ` '—� --}� [. '— r�•.r� I ._ — - — � ' — _ i��i�ivwiYobiri sfkan• WEBS (' �. •••• . _*EB-6 I •�,. — des �y III ..- � :I ..-l��.."�.� � •-'�EB-i• �,� i z,'SEB4 .+ " t ^r'.�3t;.�• `'•;-/ ma's ti., ,« ' ..+tip• -•r i' i -� � it - /� ~•S: w — EB-B -WE" - I y.w.-- *EB-9 a , r DEB-10 N A Y 40 w I� FEET LEGEND: 0ES EXPLORATION BORING -AESI 5/18 DEB EXPLORATION BORING -AESI 8/18 CONTOUR INTERVAL =1' NOTE: LOCATION AND DISTANCES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. NOTES 1 BASE MAP REFERENCE: AHBL, WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, SHEETS 2, 3, 4, AND 5, 5/8116 BLACKAND WHRE REPRODUCTION OF THIS COLOR ORIGINALMAY REDUCE ITS EFFECTMESSAND LEAO TO WCORRECT INTERPRETATION. a s s a 0 i ate d earth sciences i n c o r p o r a t e d SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON NO. DATE: P GURE 180215E001 8/18 2 ° °ova, Well -graded gravel and Terms Describing Relative Density and Consistency m ^ S ,° o ° o ° GW gravel with sand, little to DensitySPT(�lblows/foot a is � o no fines Very Loose 0 to 4 Coarse ° > o m U L0 M1.0000 Loose 4 to 10 Grained Soils Medium Dense 10 to 30 Test Symbols 0 0 0 0 0 00000 GP Poorly -graded gravel rn 00. and gravel with sand, Dense 30 to 50 CD �° a .00000 00000 little to no fines Very Dense > 50 G =Grain Size a z o z 0 c 2002002 M= Moisture Content Consistency SPT7lornrslfaat A= Atterberg Limits p co m `= , Silty gravel and silty Very Soft 0 to 2 C = Chemical c '� �, ° Il GM gravel with sand Fine- Soft 2 to 4 DD =Dry Density ° LL ° ° Grained Soils Medium Stiff 4 to 8 K = Permeability cc 16 o Stiff 8 to 15 y N Clayey gravel and Very Stiff 15 to 30 NI GC clayey gravel with sand Hard >30 o L Component Definitions o Well -graded sand and t Descriptive Term Size Range and Sieve Number SW sand with gravel, little Boulders Larger than 12' li to no fines Cobbles 3'to 12' d LL ' ' " " " Gravel 3'to No. 4 (4.75 mm) Poor - raded sand ry g 0 w 0 > U ._ a' SP and sand with ravel, 9 Coarse Gravel 3'to 3/4' Fine Gravel 3/41to No. 4 (4.75 mm) a c c It ° d little to no fines Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) 0 z Coarse Sand No. 4 (4.75 mm) to No. 10 (2.00 mm) _ Silty sand and Medium Sand No. 10 (2.00 mm) to No. 40 (0.425 mm) =N SM Silty sand with Fine Sand No. 40 (0.425 mm) to No. 200 (0.075 mm) ° U o a C c _ .- . - . gravel Silt and Clay Smaller than No. 200 (0.075 mm) ii 0) Estimated Percentage Moisture Content N _ SC Clayey sand and NI clayey sand with gravel Component Percentage by Weight Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Trace <5 Slightly Moist - Perceptible Silt, sand sift, ravel sift, y gravelly moisture o ML silt with sand or gravel Some 5 to <12 Moist - Damp but no visible c N Modifier 12 to <30 water Clay of low to medium N (silty, sandy, gravely) Very Moist - Water visible but c m 'Q Cv CL plasticity; silty, sandy, or not free draining z E gravelly clay, lean clay Very modifier 30 to <50 Wet - Visible free water, usual y (silty, sandy, gravely) from below water table ti = Organic clay or sift of low Symbols B :n _— OL plasticity Blows/6' or 0 _— Sampler portion of 6' Cement grout ° _— Type 1 surface seal Elastic sift, clayey sift, silt 2.0.OD O Sampler Type c MH with micaceous or Description Split -Spoon � c4) Bentonfte seal Ln y y diatomaceous fine sand or ift Sampler 3.0' OD Split -Spoon Sampler Filter pack with y > m ° (SPT) 3.25° OD Split Spoon Ring Sampler c•� : ;= blank cash 9 Clayof high plasticity, g p r°n 4) U o ,n c = CH Sandy or gravelly Clay, fat Bulk sample 3.0' OD Thin -Wall Tube Sampler = section =Screened casing y E clay with sand or gravel " (including Shelby tube) ;with filter pack O N Grab Sample End cap Q � ��i r Organic clay or sift of 9 Y _� Portion not recoveredLL JOH medium to high (1) Percentage by dry weight (4) Depth of ground water ri��f�i� plasticity (2) (SPT) Standard Penetration Test [ASTM D-1586) T ATD = At time of drilling (3) In General Accordance with - Static water level (date) >'.52 y Peat, muck and other c o,'ron PT highly organic soils Standard Practice for Description (5) Combined USCS symbols used for O and Identification of Soils (ASTM D-2488) fines between 5% and 12% Classifications of soils in this report are based on visual field and/or laboratory observations, which include density/consistency, moisture condition, grain size, and plasticity estimates and should not be construed to imply field or laboratory testing unless presented herein. Visual -manual and/or laboratory classification methods of ASTM D-2487 and D-2488 were used as an identification guide for the Unified Soil Classification System. 0a s s o c i a t e d ,� I earth sciences EXPLORATION LOG KEY FIGURE Al i n c o r p o r a t e d associated Exploration Lo e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-1 1 1of1 Project Name Wildwood Elementary School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) 49.3 _ Location Federal Vyiay. A Datum NGVn 99 Driller/Equipment EDI I Truck Ria _ _ Date Start/Finish 5117118 5117118 Hammer Weight/Drop 140# / 30" Hole Diameter (in) -flinches l O y 'd > BIOWS/FOOLa � a S >E , n o mT m t o DESCRIPTION 5 3 10 20 30 40 ". 74 Grass Turf 1 TopsolI - 6 Inches Weathered Vashon Lodgement 1111 Rough drilling 6 inches to 1 foot. S-1 : Moist, brown to light reddish brown, fine SAND, some silt, trace gravel; 14 �5ori^ minor organics; driller noted pounding on rock (SP-SM). --————— — — — —a- ------___------------- Vashon Lodgement Tlll 5 S-2 _ Harder drilling observed at 4 feet. Moist, gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace grave; unsorted (SM). - 10 S-3 Moist, light brownish gray to gray, very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; 1 5or unsorted (SM). Tough drilling observed -12 to 13 feet with abundant gravel. - 15 1 S 4 ' .' Moist, ligdht brown to light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; M. unsorteSM . "torr of exploration boring at 15.5 feet No groundwater encountered. - 20 - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) ❑ No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: TG m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) U Ring Sample Q Water Level () Approved by: dHS ® Grab Sample L] Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Lo e a r t h so i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-5 1Of1 Project Name WIdwood Elementary School Ground Surface Elevation (ft) -:!AN _ Location Federal Wad, WA _ Datum -NGVI- 9A Driller/Equipment Date Start/Finish -8 JL R Hammer Weight/Drop 14Q# L 30" _ Hole Diameter (in) z5 UJ m U '_ E c O m m > J Blows/Foot w rq H aai S m T P W a :� E 2.2 3 a� �' DESCRIPTION 0 310 ° 10 20 30 40 Asphalt - 2 inches FlII S-1 Moist, light brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; minor 13 organics (SM). 10 Ai 6 5 Moist to very moist, slightly oxidized dark brown to grayy, silty, fine SAND, q S-2 trace to some gravel; minor organics (wood debris) (SM). 3 10 7 5-3 Moist to very moist, slightly oxidized brown to darts brown, silty, fine SAND, 2 trace to some gravel; occasional organics (woody debris) (SM). 2 A4 2 Vashon Lodgement Till - 10 Driller notes tougher drilling at 9 feet. 5-4 :: Moist to slightly moist, brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some 26 gravel; unsorted (SM). 16 56 37 - 15 S-5 : Moist, gray to grayish brown, verysilty,fine SAND, some ravel, ranging to g g gWIT SILT; unsorted 24 - sandy, (SM-ML). Very tough drilling observed at 17 feet with abundant gravel. - 20 S-B Moist, brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 19 ' 37 5S 22 — — Bottom of exploration boring at 21.5 feet No groundwater encountered. - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample Q Water Level Q Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample Q Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated Exploration Lq e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-6 1of1 Project Name 1N61dwood Elernentary� 1 _ Ground Surface Elevation (ft) -491 Location Federal Way. WA Datum 99 _NGVr) Driller/Equipment F vn ironmenWl Drilling Inc. / Truck Mounted Drill Date Start/Finish 8111188/111A Hammer Weight/Drop 14Q# 130" _ Hole Diameter (in) 75 a d E L� C E A =y a N� Blows/Foot a) S T `0 m DESCRIPTION 0 3 10- 20 30 40 ° Asphalt • 2.5 Inches Vashon Lodgernent TIII Difficult drilling 0.5 to 2 feet. 5 S-1 Moist, brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some ravel; unsorted SM 9 Y tY. 9 ( ) 26 Sm 501 Tough drilling and abundant gravel at 7 feet. - 10 S-2 - :- Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted; rocks at 0/ top of Sampler (sM)- Switched to cathead 1401b hammer at 10 feet. Very tough drilling and abundant gravel at 11 feet. - 15 S-3 Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). 42 . - 20 S-4 As above, poor recovery. 50! Bottom of exploration boring at 20.5 feet No groundwater encountered. - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2" OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m 3" OD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) Ring Sample �Z Water Level() Approved by: CJK ® Grab Sample Z Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) associated a IorationLo 97-1of1 e a r t h s c i e n c e s Project Number Exploration Number Sheet incorporated 180215EO01 EB-7 Project Name Ground Surface Elevation (ft) --490 Location Datum 99 _N.GV_D Driller/Equipment -Environmental Drii 'noInc._I Truck Mounted Drill Date StarVFinish 811118R11 /1 R _ Hammer WeighVDrop 1404 130" Hole Diameter (in) 75 v L a U — p '� E O '=y a > J ;D 3 Blows/Foot W FTa y S E T m L > L9U) 3:E DESCRIPTION U m 10 20 30 40 ° _ Asphalt - 2 Inches Weathered Vashon Lodgement TIII rw1 Moist, grayish light brown, fine SAND, some silt, some gravel; unsorted 18 (SM), 48 66 5 S-2 — — — — — — — — — — Vashon Lodgement Till — — — — — _ 0/ Moist, light brownish gray, silty, fine SAND, trace gravel ranging to fine SAND, some silt, trace gravel; unsorted (SM). S'3 Moist, light brownish gray to gray, silty, fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted (SM). — 10 S-4 JMoist to very moist, light brownish gray, very silty, fine SAND, trace gravel; 50 ^ unsorted; rock in spoon (SM). 15 S-5 •' • Moist, light brownish gray, silty to very silty, fine SAND, some gravel; O/E k50/ - unsorted(SM). Difficult drilling and abundant gravel observed at 17 feet. 20 S-6 •' Moist, gray, silt , fine SAND, some gravel; unsorted ism). Bottom of exptaratfon boring at 20.25 feet No groundwater encountered. - 25 - 30 - 35 Sampler Type (ST): m 2^ OD Split Spoon Sampler (SPT) F] No Recovery M - Moisture Logged by: CC m W CD Split Spoon Sampler (D & M) 11 Ring Sample Q Water Level() Approved by: CJK ® Gram Sample 0 Shelby Tube Sample 1 Water Level at time of drilling (ATD) FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Office of the Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. SUPERINTENDENT April 26, 2019 Mayor Jim Ferrell JUN 2 4 2019 City of Federal Way CITY OF FEDERAL W Ay 33325 8th Ave S COMMUNIFTY 0EVE1LCPMr=, T Federal Way, WA 98003 RE: Wildwood Elementary Site Development Permit Dear Mayor Ferrell, As a follow up to the meeting between the Federal Way School District and The City of Federal Way on Thursday April 18, 2019, please accept this letter as documentation and confirmation of the School District's position. Our Civil Engineer, LPD, provided a design that the City reviewed. One of the comments from the City was related to existing site condition ground covers that would necessitate the enlargement of the Flow Control Facility. Based on the attached letter, which is also within the Technical Information Report from our Engineer, the District believes that the system is correctly and appropriately sized and designed. The District understands that if Ecology or any other regulatory authority with jurisdiction, outside of the City of Federal Way, finds the system was not adequately sized by the District's Engineer that the District is solely liable for any penalties, expansion, modification and mitigation of same and further agrees to fully indemnify the City. The District also understands that entering into a storm water covenant with the City is a requirement of this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Respectfully, Dr. Tammy Campbell Superintendent, Fedeal Way Public Schools Attachment Cc: Cole Elliot, P.E., Development Services Manager, City of Federal Way EJ Walsh, P.E., Public Works Director, City of Federal Way Casey Moore, Director of Capital Projects, FWPS Mike Benzien, Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations, FWPS Federal Way Public Schools Each Scholar: A voice. A dream. A BRIGHT future. 33330 8th Avenue South, Federal Way, WA 98003 1 p.253.945.2000 I f.253.945.2011 I www.fwps.org 1932 First Avenue, Suite 201 Seattle, Washington 98101 P. 206.725.121 1 F. 206.973.5344 Ipdengineering.com HECEIVED April 29, 2019 SUN 2 4 2019 Federal Way Public Schools CITY OF FEDERAL WAy Dr. Tammy Campbell COMMUNfTY DEVELOPMENT Superintendent, Federal Way Public Schools 1211 South 332nd Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Stormwater Target Surfaces Federal Way Public Schools Elementary School Replacements: Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, and Wildwood Dear Dr. Campbell: LPD has reviewed the City of Federal Way's concerns with the mitigated "Target Surfaces" and are confident, based upon our professional judgement, that the surfaces mitigated in the design provided to the City are in accordance with the intent of the Department of Ecology stormwater requirements as adopted and incorporated into the 2016 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Federal Way. The specific area of concern to the City of Federal Way was the post developed landscaped areas that are currently either impervious or grass/landscape areas in the existing conditions. Based upon our review of the adopted codes associated with the required mitigated Target Surfaces, these post developed landscaped areas are not considered target surfaces for Core Requirement #3, Flow Control, and are not required to be mitigated to a forested condition. LPD determined the "Target Surfaces" based upon the King County Manual and the City of Federal Way's adoption of that manual. Below is a summary of the code requirements and definitions: Summary of Code Requirements and Definitions Per the City of Federal Way Code 13.25.010 Core Requirement #3: (c) Core RequveaWrir #3— Flow Control. All proposed pro]ects. mrhid Prig redevelopment protects, must provide on, site roVr cons rol IacilAtes to mti t9ate the impacts of increased storm and surface water runoff generated by the addition of new Impervious surface, new pervious surface and replacement impervious surfaces_ These facilities shall, at a minimum, meet the performance criteria for one of the area -specific flow control standards and be implemented according to the applicable flow control implementation requirements described in the KCSWDM. Flow control BMPs must be provided as directed in the KCSWDM. When defining the Target surfaces the following surfaces have to be considered based upon the Manual. 1. New impervious surface that is not fully dispersed 2. New pervious surface that is not fully dispersed 3. Existing impervious surface added since January 8, 2001 that is not fully dispersed 4. Replaced impervious surface that is not fully dispersed (non-redevelopmentproject) 5. Replaced impervious surface that is not fully dispersed on a transportation redevelopment project 6. Replaced impervious surface that is not fully dispersed (redevelopmentproject) Please note that each of the Elementary School projects are considered "Redevelopment" projects. April 29, 2019 Stormwater Target Surfaces Federal Way School District Elementary School Replacement Page 2 The landscaped surfaces are not "New Pervious Surface" based upon the following King County and adopted City of Federal Way definition provided below. Nor will the change in surface increase stormwater runoff. New- pervious surface means the conversion of a narrre rcgeiared swfare or other native surface to a non-native pervious surface (e_g- conversion of forest or meadow to pasture land. grass land. cultivated land_ lawn landscaping, bare soil. etc.), or any alteration of existing non-native pen-ious surface that significantly increases stormn^ater runoff (e.g., conversion of pasture land. grass land_ or cultivated land to law, landscaping_ or bare soil: or alteration of soil characteristics). The landscaped surfaces are not "replaced impervious surface" based upon the following King County and adopted City of Federal Way Definition. Replaced impervious surface means any existing imperious surface on the project site that is proposed to be removed and re-established as impervious surface_ excluding impervious surface removed for the sole purpose of installing utilities or performing maintenance on underground infrastructure_ For structures. rem c ed means the removal of buildings dorm to the foundation. For other iuupervious surfaces. removed means the removal down to base course or bare soil_ It does not include the removal of pavement material through grinding or other surface modification unless the entire layer of PCC or AC is removed. Replaced impervious surface also includes impervious surface that is moved from one location to another on the project site where the following two conditions are met: (A) the area from which the impervious surface is moved from .Nfll be restored to the same or better runoff discharge characteristics as the area being covered by the moved impervious surface, and (B) impervious surface at the new location is either designated as non- pollution generating or the pollution generating characteristics remain unchanged compared to that of the original location. The landscaped surfaces are not "new impervious surface" based upon the following King County and adopted City of Federal Way Definition. New impervious surface means the addition of a hard or compacted surface like roofs. pavement, gravel, or dirt_ or the addition of a more compacted surface, like pa-%ing over pre-existing dirt or gravel. Permeable pavement and vegetated roofs are considered new imper►,-ious surface for purposes of determining whether the thresholds for application of minimum requirements are exceeded, as are lawns, landscaping. sports fields, golf courses, and other areas that have modified runoff characteristics resulting from the addition of underdrams designed to collect stormy Ater nunof. . Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall not be considered imperious surfaces for purposes of determining uIether the thresholds for application of minimum requirements are Since these surfaces do not meet any of the definitions above, they are not considered target surfaces. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Laurie J Pfarr, P.E. Principal JOwner CC. Rebecca Baibak, Integrus Sam Schafer, Integrus integru�sTllFf RECEIVE® MEMORANDUM TO: EJ Walsh, P.E. Director of Public Works 33325 80, Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 FROM: Sam Schafer, AIA Integrus Architecture DATE: June 21, 2019 117 S. Main St., Suite 100 Seattle, WA98104 SUBJECT: Pedestrian Site Access and Safe Routes to School 206.628.3131 office 206.628.3138 I fax ry Wildwood Elements School Integrus Project No. 21739 JUN 24 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT As part of Federal Way Public School's safe routes to school plan and pedestrian site access to Wildwood Elementary, pedestrian gates have been located at the south portion of the site to maintain connection the surrounding neighborhood and cul-de-sacs at 24th PI S and 25th PI S. A pedestrian gate is located at the gates on -site to allow for pedestrian access onto the playfields. Routing: City of Federal Way ■is■■ _s ■ 1"-0 _ ■ — Walk Area (1 road mile) Walk/Bike Route snoss; School Speed Zone ---- Paths/Trails School Traffic Light Stop Sign Q Stop Sign - Four -Way Stop Sign -Three-Way ® Crossing Guard Crosswalk AHazard X; Railroad Crossing Nob: Not all symbols may appear w the map. Map Notes: Children living on residential streets that are connected to the walk routes can walk along their streets to Me main routes. Small children should be accompanied by adults. All pedestrians should follow the attached safety tips. 100Mia Fedeol Wry amod OYeld engineerin4p, April 1, 2019 EJ Walsh, P.E. Director of Public Works 33325 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 April I, 2019 Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Deviation Request Feder -al Way Public Schools RECEI . _ - - Page I jUN 2 4 2M CITY OF FE EPA �'," COMMUNITY DE - Re: Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Deviation Request Federal Way Public Schools Dear Mr. Walsh: This letter is an official written request for a deviation from the Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Under the "Required Storm Water Control and Treatment" section, the Commercial Land Use Checklist states: "Ifproperty is outside City center, facilities are above -ground" In addition, all three City of Federal Way Pre -application Conference Summaries comment under the Public Works Development Services Division: "Detention and water qualityfacilities must be above ground (i.e. open pond). Underground facilities are allowed only with approval from the City of Federal Way Public Works Department" This specific comment in the pre -application conference summary cannot be found in the City of Federal Way Municipal Code. To clarify this pre -application requirement, LPD reached out to Cole Elliot to verify if the project needed a variance through Public Works. He stated: I have looked high and low for a section in the Federal Way Revised Coed (FWRC), Development Standards, Comprehensive Plan and the City Core Section which would require all storm retention/detention systems outside of City Core to be above ground. I found It listed on our Pre - Application Conference summary and on the Development Services review checklist but I did not find that requirement in code. I was able to locate one maintenance policy regarding open ponds but that applies to systems the City will own and maintain. Therefore so long as it is clear in your design proposal that the proposed storm vaults will be owned and maintained by the School District it appears that you do not need to apply for a variance thru the Public Works Department. Cole Elliott, PE Development Services Manager LrTY N Federal Way 33325 8th Ave South Federal Way, WA 98003 Office: (253) 835-2730 Cell: (253) 293-4152 www.CffVofFederalWaV.com April I, 2019 Commercial Land Use Review Checklist Deviation Request Federal Way Public Schools Page 2 However, upon receiving preliminary Land Use Comments, the City is requiring an official written request. We are proposing the following: 1. Underguoutid detention facilities for Mirror Lake for on -site and off -site improvements 2. Underground detention facilities for Lake Grove for on -site and off -site improvements 3. Underground detention facilities for Wildwood for on -site improvements The improvements as required would not be harmonious with existing street improvements, would not function properly or safely or would not be advantageous to the neighborhood or City as a whole." An above ground detention facility such as an open pond is not appropriate for a school setting. It would increase the risk of student safety. In the school district opinion, the fencing requirements for an above ground facility will not guarantee prevention of student access and will require additional supervision. In addition, above ground detention facilities take away outdoor program space for students. The Outdoor learning areas are crucial to the school district's agenda to provide a diversified learning environment for the community's youth. In summary, the City's acceptance of the deviation request above, the usage of underground detention facilities would be better suited to function safely and be advantageous for a school environment and ultimately the local community. Thank you for your consideration and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, �, 41; JentAfer L. Jk6raves, P.E. Project Manager I Sr. Civil Engineer CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2019 TO: Cole Elliott, Development Services Manager Scott Sproul, Building Official Rick Perez, City Traffic Engineer Brian Asbury, Lakehaven Water & Sewer District Chris Cahan, South King Fire & Rescue Lindsey Sperry, Public Safety Officer FROM: Natalie Kamieniecki, Associate Planner FOR DRC MTG. ON: January 31, 2019 - Internal Completeness Review --FILE NUMBER(s) : 19-100173-UP RELATED FILE NOS.: 18-103301-PC PROJECT NAME: WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT ADDRESS: 2405 S 300TH ST ZONING DISTRICT: RS 7.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demolition of existing elementary school and construction of a new 60,000 square foot elementary school building. LAND USE PERMITS: PROCESS III PROJECT CONTACT: RAY VEFIK MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Master Land Use Application Design Standards Narrative Crime Prevention Checklist SEPA MDNS Geotechnical Report Critical Area Map Technical Information Report Traffic Impact Analysis Lakehaven Developer Extension Agreement Title Report Building Elevations and Site Plans RECEIVED MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION JAN 10 2019 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT mok" 33325 8`h Avenue South CITY OF 1pft*CITY OF FEDERAL WAY Federal Way, WA 98003-6325 Federal Wav,MMUNITY 0LI/ELOPh9EMT 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 www.ciMffederalway.com APPLICATION NO(S) / ! r 0-0/ / 3 rU/11 Date 6>I_10 r 1 01 Project Name „ Wildwood Elementary School Property Address/Location 2405 South 300th Street / Federal Way, WA 98003 Parcel Number(s) 0421049167 Project Description PLEASE PRINT Demolish & Replace an existing Elementary School with a newly constructed Elementary School. Type of Permit Required Annexation Binding Site Plan Boundary Line Adjustment Comp Plan/Rezone Land Surface Modification Lot Line Elimination Preapplication Conference Process I (Director's Approval) Process II (Site Plan Review) _X_Process III (Project Approval) Process IV (Hearing Examiner's Decision) Process V (Quasi -Judicial Rezone) Process VI SEPA w/Project SEPA Only Shoreline: Variance/Conditional Use Short Subdivision Subdivision Variance: Commercial/Residential Requggired Information R572 Family-1 Unit/7,200 SF Zoning Designation Sin - le Famil Low Density omprehensive Plan Designation $2,532,300 Value of Existing Improvements $25.957.500 Value of Proposed Improvements International Building Code (IBC): Groups E, B, A-3 Occupancy Type Type II-B Construction Type Applicant Name: Federal Way Public Schools Address:1211 South 332nd Street City/State:Federal Way / WA Zip: 98003 Phone: 253-945-5930 Fax:253-945-5959 gn711 or Signature: T , g� Agent (if different than Applicant) Name: CBRE I Heery Address: 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1700 City/State: Seattle / WA Zip: 98101 Phone:206-835-0473 Fax: None Email: rvefilc0wps.orat Owner Name: Federal Way Public Schools Address: 1211 South 332nd Street City/State: Federal Way / WA Zip:98003 Phone: 253-945-5930 Fax: 253-945-5959 Email: mbenziep@fwps.org Signawl Bulletin #003 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 1 k:\Handouts\N4aster Land Use Application SEPA RULES WAC 197-11-970 Determination of non -significance (DNS) MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal: Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Applicant: Federal Way Public Schools No. 210 Location of Proposal: 2405 S. 300' Street, Federal Way, Washington 98003 Legal Description: Refer to Page 7 of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) — Environmental Checklist for Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Lead Agency: Federal Way Public Schools No. 210After review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the agency, the Federal Way School District No. 210 has determined this proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This information is available to the public on request. This MDNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 14 days from the date below. Comments must be received by January 28', 2019 at 5:00 PM. Responsible Official: Mike Benzien 1211 S. 332°d Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: (work) 253-945-5965 email: mbenzien@fwps.org Date Issued Signature Comment Period Information: Any person may appeal and submit comments regarding this determination. Comments will be considered on environmental issues and any environmental documents related to the proposed action. All written comments will become part of the record. Comments are due by 5:00 P.m. January 28', 2019, and must be sent to suggest Mike Benzien, who is available to answer questions regarding this project at the above address or by email: R E C INLrD JAN 10 ?n19 CITY C" F-OOEcZAL [ J. Y C®IMiMUNiTY 0EVLQPMEN7 LEGAL NOTICE Notice of Decision Threshold Determination: SEPA Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (MDNS) Wildwood Elementary School Replacement Project, No. FWPScp18-WIL Project Proponent and SEPA Lead Agency: Federal Way Public Schools, Capital Projects, Operations & Maintenance Department Description of Proposal: The purpose of this project is to replace an existing elementary school for Federal Way Public Schools (FWPS) as part of a recent bond measure passed by voters in November 2017. Wildwood Elementary School is located on the existing 9.38-acre site at 2405 S 300th Street, Federal Way, Washington, 98003. The existing school was built in 1967 with various additions and modernizations over the years, with the last remodeling completed in 1991. The existing facility occupies the northern portion of the site, extending east to west, and is comprised of a single -story building with classrooms arranged along a double -loaded corridor; four portable classrooms are also located onsite. Playfields occupy the southern portion of the site. The project will include the demolition of the existing facility and construction of a new 2-story elementary school campus to maximize site area and increase efficiency. Frontage improvements will be provided; including standard elements encompassing a driving lane, parking lane, planter strip and sidewalk. To fully comply with ADA requirements, ramps will be provided at the curbs for main driveway access points, as needed. Location: The site is located at 2405 S 300th Street, Federal Way, Washington, 98003. The King County Tax Parcel Number is 042104-9167 and it is located in the SE quarter of Section 04, Township 21 N, Range 4 E. Public and Agency Comments: In making a final Threshold Determination, the Responsible Official reviewed the completed environmental checklist and other environmental information on file with FWPS and the City of Federal Way; relying on the information therein to exercise substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.060, and the Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (MDNS) is issued under the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11-340(2). The Responsible Official has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. However, in addition to contextual revisions (errata), and the inclusion of updated reports, the following mitigations have been identified as a result of further investigation and comments received from the general public and affected jurisdictions: Included in the revised SEPA Environmental Checklist is the project schedule and responses to concerns regarding accessibility, student transportation, recreation, security and emergency preparedness during construction. Decommissioning and removal of unused underground storage tanks; including requisite soil testing/remediation and tank closure assessment protocols, conducted by qualified professionals engaged by the District. Completion of a final traffic impact analysis (TIA); including the following mitigations: o Installation of required roadway improvements, including pedestrian circulation and onsite improvements for South 3001h Street and 231d Avenue South, is discussed, pending approval of a Right -of -Way Modification Request; including the removal of speed bumps of South 3001h Street and the proposed construction of mini -roundabouts at each driveway intersection as a means of reducing travel speeds and improving sight distance o The addition of sections evaluating Student Pick-Up/Drop-Off locations from a traffic and pedestrian safety perspective, a presentation of School Safe Walk Routes, and a Queuing Analysis to clarify the potential for traffic issues during arrival/dismissal times. o Trip generation data added for 2020 horizon year; projecting trip generation of 284 daily trips (98 AM Peak and 51 PM Peak) for the new facility and illustrating the effect RECEIVED JAN 10 2019 CIS( DF FEDEFIAL WAY CONli'miJMTY DEVELOPMENT of trips on level of service (LOS) intersection standards, based on volume/capacity ration for signalized and unsignalized intersections. o Public transit stop information updated o Potential traffic impact fees identified, based on increased square footage Appeal Procedure: The issuance of a Threshold Determination is subject to review under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). If a petitioner wishes to appeal, the process and timing of the judicial appeal procedure detailed in Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 36.070C.040 shall be followed; immediately within the appeal period provided under statute; said appeal period shall commence on January 14, 2019 and conclude on January 28, 2019. Appeal proceedings for review under this chapter will require filing a land use petition in Superior Court. There is no separate administrative SEPA appeal for this type of land use decision. Responsible Official: Michael Benzien Title: Executive Director of Maintenance and Operations Mailing Address: Federal Way Public Schools, Educational Service Center, 33330 8th Avenue South, Federal Way WA 98003 Date of publication in the Federal Way Mirror. Friday, January 11, 2019 Date of publication in the Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce, Monday, January 14, 2019 Federal Way Public Schools FEDERAL WAY Educational Service Center (ESC) PUBLIC SCHOOLS 33330 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for Applicants This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of Checklist for Non -Project Proposals For non -project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements —that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 9_. a L.1-r L: f 'Q, �.--. '- JAN 10 2n19 N►EP ECOMUDFEDERAL Page 1 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY ■ PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8°F Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Federal Way Public Schools Wildwood Elementary School Replacement, 2405 S 3001h Street, Federal Way, Washington 98003 Wilctwood Elementary School S K12 J Fi Figure I Project Site Vicinity Figure I - Vicinity Map - Wildwood Elementary School Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 2 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 811 Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Federal Way Public Schools (FWPS) Support Services Center,1211 South 332nd St, Federal Way, WA 98003 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Mike Benzien, Executive Director, Maintenance and Operations Federal Way Public Schools Support Services Center 1211 S 332110 Street, Federal Way WA 98003 (206) 945.5930 (Office) 4. Date checklist prepared: September 25, 2018; revised January 7, 2019 5. Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way Public Schools (Lead Agency) City of Federal Way, Washington Contact Person: Robert McNeill, Senior Planner Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. 18215 72nd Avenue S, Kent, WA 98032 (425) 251-6222 (Office) bmcneill[mbarghausen.com 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The complexity of this project dictates a tentative schedule be established which remains subject to change based on the length of entitlement permitting and plan review processes, weather conditions and/or contractor availability. Included in this document is the proposed project schedule and responses to concerns regarding accessibility, student transportation, recreation, security and emergency preparedness during construction. The current scheduled start date for vacating Wildwood Elementary School is mid/late June 2019, with contractor mobilization scheduled to begirt shortly thereafter. Demolition activity is projected to begin in mid -July 2019, with a mid -August 2019 completion targeted — including abatement activity. Actual construction of the replacement school is projected to begin no later than late August 2019, with substantial completion scheduled for mid -October 2020. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Applicant has no further plans for future additions, expansion or other similar activity relative to this development proposal aside from what is described in this proposal. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The Applicant has commissioned several reports addressing environmental issues: a Geotechnical Engineering Report, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) 6/18. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 3 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Putrtic Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 SM Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 Subsurface Investigation Report, PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc., (PBS) 9121 Wetlands and Buffer Analysis, Environmental Science Associates (ESA), pending, fqr submittal during permittingiplan review Acoustical Analysis, Stantec, 9118 Traffic Impact Analysis, Transportation Engineering North West (TENW)11118 Arborist Report; pending, for submittal during permitting/plan review Site Lighting/Photometric Analysis; pending, for submittal during permitting/plan review The Applicant is fully committed to developing mitigation measures on any environmental concerns identified by these studies or discovered during the permitting/plan review process. Figure 2 - Aerial View - Existing Wildwood Elementary School 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. The City of Federal Way will be conducting a Process III, Use Approval review process in accordance with review criteria established in the Federal Way Revised Code (FWRC), Section 19.65.100(2). SEPA review is typically processed concurrently with Process III applications. As Lead Agency, FWPS will process this SEPA checklist in advance of permitting with the City of Federal Way. The Lakehaven Water and Sewer District will review the Wildwood construction plans as they relate to water and sewer availability, system capacity and infrastructure improvements necessary to adequately serve the new facility. The South King Fire and Rescue District will review plans to assure adequate fire flow and hydrant facilities are available, as well as the installation of sprinkler and alarm Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 4 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8% Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLSFederal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 systems and assuring adequate fire access is maintained for emergency vehicles. Both of these agencies' approval processes will occur concurrently with the City of Federal Way plan review and construction permitting processes. The Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) will require a Notice of Demolition be submitted along with the results of a professional asbestos survey of the existing facility (and proposed mitigation — if necessary). PSCAA will also require a Notice of Construction be filed. South King Fire and Rescue District (SKFRD) will conduct a thorough review of project plans; including, but not limited to, fire prevention measures, the installation of fire alarm and suppression equipment, the location and capacity of both water lines and hydrants (fire flow), and overall site plan design as related to the designation of fire lanes and emergency vehicle access. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The list below is a preliminary assessment of permitting likely to be required for this project, pending further review. ■ Process III / Project Approval Concurrency Right -of -Way Modification Waiver (if necessary) Master Land Use Application ■ NPDES General Permit (DOE) ■ Demolition Permits (PSCAA) • Demolition Permits (City) • Building and Construction Permits (Federal Way) ■ Retaining Wall Permits (if required) ■ MEP - Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Permits ■ Sign Permits (if required) ■ Stormwater Covenants ■ Water I Sewer Permits and Developer Extension Agreement (Lakehaven) The following codes will be enforced under the FWRC for this project: ■ International Building Cade (IBC), 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51-50 c International Mechanical Code (IMC), 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51-52 ■ Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51-56 & WAC 51-57 9 International Fire Code (IFC), 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51 -54 ■ International Residential Code, 2015, as amended by Washington State Amendments WAC 51.51 ■ National Electric Code (NEC), 2017 Accessibility Code (ICCIANSI A117.1), 2009 ■ Washington State Energy Code, 2015 WAC 51-11 Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 5 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8", Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal way WA 98003 (253) 445-2000 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Wildwood Elementary School is located on the existing 9.38-acre site at 2405 South 300th Street in Federal Way, Washington. The site is served by South 300th Street, running east -west along the north edge of the property. The school property is zoned residential single family (RS-7.2), with schools being a permitted use. The school is surrounded by single family residential development, with Wildwood Park immediately to the west. Steel Lake is one block away to the south. The existing school building, portable structures and associated parking areas sit within the northern portion of the overall school property while playfields occupy the entire southern portion of the site. Vehicular access to and from the site is currently via two driveways off of South 300th Street, which is located directly north of the school property. Circulation through the site is via a one-way drive aisle, which provides access to existing parking areas. The westernmost vehicular access point provides ingress to the site and the easternmost driveway serves as the egress point from the site. r: i ti ,v i Figure 3 - Proposed Site Plan - New MiIdwood Elementary School The existing Wildwood Elementary School currently serves approximately 550 scholars from pre- kindergarten through 5th grade. The existing building was originally constructed in 1967 and opened for students in 1968; experiencing various additions and modernizations over the years with the last remodel project occurring in 1991. The existing facility is comprised of a single -story building with classrooms arranged along a double loaded corridor (46,798 SF), along with four portable classroom buildings (3,584 SF). Given the limited site access and available area to build a new school while the existing school is occupied, FWPS decided the school will be housed off site during construction. At this time, a specific location has not yet been determined. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 6 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way PuNic Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8" Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is located at 2405 South 300th Street in Federal Way, Washington, and is illustrated on the included vicinity map. An abbreviated legal description, parcel number and lot size are provided below: APN: 042104-9167 Legal: SE %, Section 04, Township 21 N, Range 04 E Lot: 9.38 Acres The project will include the demolition of the existing school facilities and the construction of a new 60,322 SF elementary school campus onsite serving 600 scholars; it is anticipated the final site plan will include the construction of new playfields, paved parking and access drives, landscaping, pedestrian pathways, exterior lighting and other typical improvements outlined in preliminary plans submitted in support of this application. Wildwood Elementary Logistics Plan Demo Phase I I I Figure 4 - Demolition Logistics - Wildwood Elementary School Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 7 of 32 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 S"' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 Wildwood Elementary Logistics Plan Construction Phase Figure 5 • Construction Logistics - Wildwood Elementary School B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site: [ ] Flat [ ] Rolling [ ] Hilly [ ] Steep Slopes [ ] Mountainous [ X ] Other See (b) below for clarification. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Topographically, the existing Wildwood school building and playfields sit on a slight plateau with steeper sloping down to lower elevations of approximately 480 feet along the eastern and western perimeters of the school property. Bulletin #050 — October 17. 2016 Page 8 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Fedefal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 80 Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA98003 (253)945-2000 The highest elevation points on the site are located north of the existing school building and near the eastern portion of the southern boundary line of the parcel. Elevation levels in these areas are approximately 505 feet, resulting in a steeply sloped hill in the right-of-way on South 300th Street. The steepest slopes found onsite are approximately forty percent (40%), but are confined to areas along the east, south and west perimeter of the parcel. Minimal sloping between zero and six percent (6%) are found elsewhere onsite. Pending further plan review, the replacement Wildwood facility will take advantage of existing grades, where possible, without the need for deep excavations and/or thick structural fill. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. According to soil data obtained from the USDA Web Soil Survey, soils on the majority of the site consist primarily of Arents, Alderwood material 6 to 15 percent slopes (AmC). To a lesser extent, site soils also consist of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam,15 to 30 percent slopes (AgD), which is predominantly concentrated in a limited area within the site's eastern extremities. Furthermore, based on preliminary findings deduced from geotechnical explorations conducted on the site, subsurface soils are comprised of fill soils underlain by Vashon lodgement till. These identifiable soil types are typically considered poor infiltration receptors. Please refer to our submittal package and the copy of, "Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report," prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Kirkland, Washington, dated June 2018, for a detailed discussion of these issues. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no surface indications of unstable soils and/or a history of soil instability manifesting itself, either onsite or in the immediate vicinity. The Applicant's preliminary geotechnical report identified portions of the slopes along the east, south and west perimeter of the parcel as geological hazard areas qualifying for treatment as an Erosion Hazard Area (EHA) under FWRC 19.145.080, and as defined by FWRC 19.05.070. Development may occur on orwithin 50-feet of this area if the development is not at risk and will not contribute to an increased risk of instability. Current plans call for construction of the new facility in the same general location as the existing building; effectively distancing itself from the designated EHA area. Required buffer reductions will be addressed during review of final construction plans, if needed. r iloo Figure 6 - Identified Critical Areas - Wildwood Elementary School Critical Areas: Erosion Hazard Area - Landslide Hazard Areas Wetlands (1998 City Survey) Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 9 of 32 01-landouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY ■ PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 87, Avenue South Federal Way WA 99003 (253)945-2000 ALI Figure 7 - Perspective Rendering (MIN Corner) Proposed Wildwood Elementary School e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Preliminary civil engineering plans project grading activity may result in extensive quantities ( CY / cubic yards) of cut and fill; current estimates indicate 19,357 CY cut and 2,582 CY of fill. All existing fill beneath proposed foundations will need to be removed (16,775 CY) and replaced with structural fill or controlled density fill; extending laterally by a distance equal to the depth of over - excavation. Precise amounts of cubic yards cut and the amount and source of fill will be determined later; the Applicant is committed to using approved sources of clean fill materials. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe Temporary erosion is a possibility associated with construction activity. The Applicant's finalized permit plans will include a temporary erosion and sedimentary control (TESC) plan; implemented using the best management practices (BMPs) associated with erosion prevention and control. The TESC system will be designed in accordance with the City of Federal Way erosion control requirements, in addition to, the 2016 KCSWDM and the Department of Ecology Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). TESC facilities will include at a minimum: stabilized construction entrance, silt fencing, catch basin inserts, interceptor swales, sediment ponds or tanks, and other miscellaneous sediment control facilities. The existing pavement will likely be used for stabilized construction access and staging until such time as it needs to be removed for construction of the proposed improvements. Temporary Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 10 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESCI FEDERAL WAY 33330 80 Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way' WA98003 (253) 945-2000 sediment settling tanks will be used for sediment control. The construction documents will include the requirements for the contractor to manage the construction site in accordance with BMPs. This will include marking the clearing limits; limiting the site area that is exposed and stabilizing exposed areas with mulch or other approved measures; protecting slopes and managing any water from construction dewatering. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Based on the preliminary civil engineering plans prepared for this submittal, approximately eleven percent (11%) will be building coverage by the new Wildwood Elementary Schooi, with a total of thirty-seven percent (37%) of the site covered by impervious surfaces (asphalt paving, driveways, sidewalks, walkways, etc.). With maximum lot coverage for structures established at seventy-five percent (75%) under the FWRC, this project falls well below the maximum threshold. However, these are preliminary estimates and subject to change as a result of permittinglpian review. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if an Specific measures to reducelcontrol erosion will be detailed on the TESC plan referred to in (f) above; these measures will likely focus on erosion potential associated with construction activity. Once the project is completed, the chances of significant erosion are virtually nil. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, the project will not produce any significant impacts andlor result in emissions of particulates or noxious odors either during construction or future operations. During construction minimal impacts may be realized as particulates (dust, dirt, etc.) are released into the air on a limited basis. A reliable estimate of quantities cannot be formulated at this time. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None; Not Applicable. The only potential source lies in the emissions from vehicular traffic using the adjacent rights -of -way. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Controlled watering of the ground will reduce particulates emitted during construction; the use of mufflers and spark arresters will help minimize vehicle emissions from construction equipment. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 11 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS M 3. Water a. Surface Water Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8°1 Avenue south Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. As required by FWRC 19.45.080, a critical areas analysis must be prepared if a proposal may falls within 225 feet of a designated critical area. The subject property is within 225 feet of a designated wetland; a mapped stream located within Wildwood Park, immediately west of the Wildwood school facility, has been identified. The closest surface body of water is Steel Lake; located within % mile of the school, south of South 30411, Street. Lake Dolloff is located about 314 mile southwest of the school, on the east side of Interstate 5. The site is located within the Hylebos Creek drainage basin, which ultimately discharges to the Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No; Not Applicable. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Under the Applicant's proposal, no filling or dredging of designated wetlands is associated with this project. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. None; Not Applicable. Under the Applicant's proposal, no surface water withdrawals and/or diversions are associated with this project; surface runoff will be controlled onsite. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site is located in Zone X; an area with minimal flood hazard. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None; Not Applicable. Under the Applicant's proposal, no discharge of waste materials to surface waters is associated with this proposal. b. Ground Water 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 12 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist �y FEDERAL WAY ■ PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC1 33330 80, Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Under the Applicant's proposal, no groundwater will be withdrawn, nor is any discharge to groundwater resulting from this project. Excavation related to construction may reveal the existence of perched groundwater deposits in the substrate; requiring removal through a dewatering process (often requiring a separate permit). 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Under the Applicant's proposal, no discharge of waste materials to ground waters is associated with this construction project. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe The site is located within the Hylebos Creek drainage basin, which ultimately discharges to the Puget Sound. Paved impervious surfaces are the only potential source of stormwater runoff; runoff will be collected through the onsite stormwater system and conveyed to the designated point of discharge. The proposed stormwater strategy and design will not alterthe existing downstream drainage patterns or path from the site. Please refer to the civil engineering plans included with this submittal for more detailed information on collection, conveyance and discharge. Per FWRC 19.45.490, FWPS will be required to submit a hazardous materials inventory with building and construction permitting. In addition, with a proposed landscaped area in excess of 10,000 square feet, FWPS will need to prepare an operations and maintenance manual using best management practices (BMPs), per FWRC 19.145.510. The site is also within the Tacoma Smelter Plume detect area and FWPS is required to obtain soil analysis conducted by an independent consultant to detect and quantify the presence of historic arsenic and/or lead contamination. While performing due diligence on this project, a leaking underground storage tank (UST) was located onsite. Indications are it was used for fuel oil storage in the past. The Applicant is committed to full cleanup/remediation of the soils onsite as part of the Wildwood demolition process. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Under the Applicant's proposal, the project has been designed to eliminate and/or limit any potential for groundwater contamination. While excessive amounts are highly unlikely, there is a possibility for surface runoff conveying unspent hydrocarbons and/or other surface contaminants from paved surfaces onsite into groundwater. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 13 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Pubtic Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 80' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, generally describe. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, drainage patterns for other properties in the vicinity will not be affected by this proposal. The Applicant's preliminary drainage plan demonstrates specific improvements designed to monitor drainage patterns and control runoff. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground and runoff water, and drainage impacts, if any. The stormwater design will be developed in compliance with the 2616 King County Stormwater Design Manual (KCSWDM) as adopted by the City of Federal Way, as well as the City's Addendum to the 2016 KCSWDM dated January 8, 2017. The site is located within the Hylebos Creek drainage basin, which ultimately discharges to the Puget Sound. There are four (4) discharge points from the school site. The majority of the stormwater runoff from the property is collected and conveyed to a catch basin in the northwest section of the site and discharged into the public system in South 300th Street. From there, stormwater in the public system flows north. and then easterly to the Green River; eventually discharging into the Puget Sound. Areas in the northeast portion of the property sheet flow to South 300th Street and then flow east, eventually joining the public system and flowing north and east towards the Green River. Areas in the northwest portion of the property also sheet flow onto South 300th Street, before being conveyed north to join the downstream path of the majority of stormwater runoff from the site. The playfield area of the site sheet flows southeast of the school property, Runoff from this third discharge point follows the same downstream path at % mile from the site, ultimately outfalling into the Puget Sound. Both the northeast and southeast drainage points of the site will be modeled as bypass in order to not alter the existing drainage patterns and downstream path. Since the existing impervious surface coverage for the site is 36.39%, the project meets the 35% threshold requirement to classify as a "redevelopment." Additionally, water quality treatment is required for all pollution generating impervious surfaces, and the project must also comply with jurisdictional flow control requirements. Soil conditions in the site area are not conducive to infiltration, eliminating options to use bioretention facilities or permeable pavement to mitigate stormwater runoff. With on -site infiltration infeasible, the stormwater management strategy for water quality treatment and flow control will encompass the use of large sand filter systems and detention facilities. The site resides within a City designated Enhanced Basic Water Quality Treatment area. In order to meet this level of required treatment, three (3) sand filter facilities are proposed for various areas of the site to treat runoff from target pollution generating impervious surfaces such as the parking lots, drive aisles, service areas, and synthetic turf playfield. The site is also located within a designated Conservation Flow Control Area. To address this level of required flow control, two detention facilities are currently proposed for the site. One detention vault will be located underneath the northern ends of the two primary parking areas (33,600 CF). FWPS will be reviewing options for stormwater water quality and flow control as part of the permitting/plan review process. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 14 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8V' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Please refer to the preliminary drainage plan prepared as part of the design package as a means of identifying the Applicant's proposal to address/control surface water runoff. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: [ X ] Deciduous tr al a en, other [ X ] Evergreen tre fir, cedar, pine other [ X ] Shrubs [ X ] Grass [ ] Pasture [ ] Crop or grain ] Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. [ ] Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other [ ] Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other [ ] Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Under the Applicant's proposal, and given the nature of the project, a number of trees and shrubs may be removed to accommodate the project design. Specific details on species, size and location of trees and shrubbery slated for removal will be detailed on preliminary demolition and landscape plans - to be finalized at a later date. Where possible, existing trees and shrubs may be incorporated into the proposed plan, Figure 8 - Proposed Landscaping Plan - Wildwood Elementary School c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no known threatened or endangered species onsite or in the immediate vicinity. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 15 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 80, Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLSFederal way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The Applicant's plans for landscaping onsite will feature trees and shrubs native to the Pacific Northwest — including a mixture of deciduous and coniferous trees and drought -tolerant plants where appropriate. Please refer to the preliminary landscape plans for a schedule of proposed plantings. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no noxious weeds and/or invasive species on or near the site. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: [ X ] Birds: Hawks, eagles, heron, other: [ ] als: Deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: [ ] Fish: Bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site on a regular basis. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The project site is located within the Pacific Flyway; well -documented as a migratory route for numerous species of birds and waterfowl. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None; Not Applicable. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no invasive animal species known to be on or near the project site. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 16 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY ■ PUBLIC SCHOOLS N 6. Energy and Natural Resources Federal Way public Schools Educational Service Center (ESCI 33330 at, Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar, wind) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, cooling, manufacturing, storage, etc. Under the Applicant's proposal, either or both electric and/or gas energy will serve to meet the project's anticipated needs. b. Would the project affect potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe the degree of impact. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge; this project would not interfere with the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans for this project? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, energy conservation features will be incorporated into the project's design and will be detailed during the permitting phase of the project— including the submittal of required energy worksheets. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, no projected environmental health hazards are or will be associated with this proposal. The risk of fire is not expected to exceed that associated with other similar educational facilities; in fact current design standards will almost certainly provide a major upgrade over existing levels of protection in terms of fire prevention. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there is no known contamination onsite, nor is there any reason to anticipate contamination exists from present and/or past educational uses. The site is located within the Tacoma Smelter Plume detect area and FWPS is required to obtain soil analysis to detect the presence of historic arsenic and/or lead contamination; FWPS has commissioned the appropriate analysis which will be included with this submittal. While performing due diligence on this project, an underground storage tank (UST) was discovered onsite, approximately 2% feet below ground surface (BGS), with a base located about 9% feet BGS. Approximately 8 feet in diameter and 21 feet long; given its proximity to the boiler room, indications are the tank was used for fuel oil storage. Studies conducted on soil samples revealed petroleum impacted soils at the southern end of the UST, and suggest leakage is limited to a depth of 17 feet BGS. The UST will be removed as part of the project and in accordance with best management practices for UST removal, FWPS will perform a tank closure assessment when the UST is decommissioned and removed. Please refer to the Bulletin #050 — October 17. 2016 Page 17 of 32 kAHandouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Pubtic Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 6 FEDERAL WAY 33330 8" Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 subsurface investigation report included with this submittal for further details. The Applicant remains fully committed to complete cleanup/remediation of the soils onsite as part of the Wildwood demolition and UST closure processes. The presence of asbestos within existing structures will be evaluated with an asbestos survey conducted by qualified professionals; required mitigation will be provided in terms of removal from the site. Evidence of the study and findings will be provided to Federal Way as part of the demolition permit process and the required Notice of Demolition will be filed with PSCAA, demonstrating compliance with their requirements as well. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no hazardous chemicals or conditions - including transmission pipelines - present onsite or in the immediate vicinity which could affect project development and/or design. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the projects development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Under the Applicant's proposal, aside from materials used during the educational process, no toxic or hazardous chemicals will be routinely stored, used and/or produced during the project's construction and/or during routine operations as an educational facility. FWPS will be required to submit a hazardous materials inventory during the building and construction permitting process. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, special emergency services will not be required by this project on a regular basis; either during construction or as a matter of routine operation. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: With no environmental health hazards and/or projected impacts identified at this stage of the development process, excluding asbestos mitigation, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Minimal noise impacts may originate from school -related traffic on the adjacent public and/or private rights -of -way; the Applicant does not anticipate any adverse impacts affecting the project. Traffic on public rights -of -way are exempt from FWRC noise regulations. Proximity to Interstate 5 may raise the ambient noise level during construction; a separate study may prove necessary to analyze full compliance with WAC 246-366-110. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 18 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESCI FEDERAL WAY 3333081iAvenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 003 (253) 9d3-2-�000 Various occupant -related noises — such as playground noise, building operations noise and safety equipment noise — will remain a factor for neighboring properties, but the Applicant expects volumes andfor frequency to replicate historical patterns. Playground noise during daytime hours is exempt from FWRC noise regulations. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term increases in noise levels will result from normal construction activity. The Applicant projects decibel levels associated with this activity will range between 57.89 DBA and be limited to those hours where construction activity is permitted tinder Federal Way code. Construction noise is typically mitigated through the use of noise attenuation devices installed on heavy equipment. Dn a long-term, regular basis, the only exception to typical right-of-way traffic noise will be related to any concentration of school bus traffic associated with the educational use. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: With no exceptional long-term impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. Significant changes are not expected from the new campus beyond what is currently experienced. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The current use of the site as an educational facility over a number of years has ingratiated the use into the character of the adjacent residential neighborhood. After the construction activity is completed, the newfacility will continue and embellish upon the traditional role of a neighborhood school and continue the District's participation in the growth of Federal Way as a community. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non -forest use? The site has not been used as either working farmland or forest lands in recent memory. As such, given the intent to maintain an educational use, the Applicant's proposal will obviously not remove any agricultural or forest land of commercial significance from Federal Way's inventory of land resources. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: None; Not Applicable. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 19 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist �j. FEDERAL WAY ■ PUBLIC SCHOOLS c. Describe any structures on the site. Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 8t Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 The site is currently occupied by an educational facility of approximately 50,382 SF including related site improvements. The existing conditions plan provided with this submittal will indicate specific locations of structures, facilities and site improvements. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Underthe Applicant's proposal, all structures currently existing onsite will be demolished; please refer to the attached demolition logistics plan for additional information. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site is currently zoned as RS 7.2 under the provisions of Federal Way's Zoning Code; additional information on applicable bulk regulations is provided in the table below. WILDWOOD CLASSIFICATION REQUIRED PROPOSED SETBACKS FRONT (NORTH) 50' 230' SIDE (EAST) 50' 286' SIDE (WEST) 50, 86' REAR (SOUTH) 50' 130' MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 55' FOR GYMS 35'-0* VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM AVERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION TO MID POINT 30' FOR ALL OTHER 33'-0- BETWEEN EAVE & RIDGE OF HIGHEST STRUCTURES PRINCIPAL SLOPED ROOF MAX LOT COVERAGE BY 75% MAX 40% STRUCTURES (FWRC 19 200 090) REQUIRED PARKING EXISTING PROPOSED 1 PER EMPLOYEE 60 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The she is designated for Single -Family / High Density land use under the provisions of the Federal Way Comprehensive Plan. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? None; Not Applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 20 of 32 k.lHandouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (E5C) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8* Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 99003 (253)945-2000 Based on City of Federal Way critical areas mapping, designated environmentally sensitive areas for the site include a large geological hazard zone within a portion of the overall school parcel. As required by FWRC 19.45.080, a critical areas analysis must be prepared if a proposal may falls within 225 feet of a designated critical area. The subject property is within 225 feet of a designated wetland; a mapped stream located within Wildwood Park, immediately west of the Wildwood school facility, has been identified. Wildwood Park, a neighborhood park maintained by the City of Federal Way's Parks Department & Recreation Division, lies on the parcel adjacent to the west of the northwestern portion of the school property. Slopes onsite have been identified as being eligible for designation as a GeologicallErosion Hazard Areas (EHA); primarily located along the east, south and west perimeters, areas associated with the mature tree buffer. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? There is no residential component associated with this project; when completed, the project is estimated to employ under 100 employees as either administrative staff, teachers and/or related professionals. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Lacking any residential component, there is no displacement associated with the Applicant's proposal. An integral element of the project design focuses on the District identifying temporary facilities for the student population during reconstruction. Additional information will be provided in detail as part of the permitting and plan review process, once plans are finalized. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: The Applicant is the current owner of the subject property. With no residential component, and thus no displacement, no mitigation is required. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The very nature of the Applicant's proposal — demolishing an antiquated educational facility in order to construct a new, modem replacement facility on the same site in approximately the same location — is conducive to ensure compatibility with existing and projected land uses under any comprehensive or neighborhood plan. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: None; Not Applicable. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 21 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9. Housing Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESCI 33330 80' Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None; Not Applicable. Under the Applicant's proposal, there is no residential component. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. None; Not Applicable. Under the Applicant's proposal, there is no residential component. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building matedal(s) proposed? The Applicant's current proposal calls for a building height of approximately thirty-five (35) feet at the structure's highest point. The detailed preliminary architectural plans submitted with this application provide a visual and tabular schedule of building materials proposed for use on this facility. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None; Not Applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The project is subject to an Administrative Design Review conducted by the City of Federal Way as part of their Process 11I/Project Approval process. Under FWRC Chapter 19.115, the project must present overall design continuity through the use of similar elements throughout the project, such as architectural style and features, materials, colors and textures. Building and site design for all institutional uses are guided by FWRC 19.115.100. With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending design review and/or evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 22 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 gel Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 S 300TH ST cs or�rzscnP - - - •- -` �- _ram - I w ..a rx .5•-t. OfI1F� Y � i } o PROP BUILDING '"�'I"'".� Elf J W U � 1 1 cr TL I f ] ! S( J { 1 �' Fh..FDE M1OT V53L- f r J ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE _ COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES DIAGRAM +ZVE l,'piiM Figure 9 - Community Design Guidelines Diagram - Wildwood Elementary School 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The Applicant's proposal is not projected to produce any light or glare resulting in spillover onto adjacent properties as currently designed. Exterior lighting fixtures would be required for public safety and onsite security for students, employees and visitors. The Applicant will be providing a site lighting plan/photometric analysis during the building permit process which will document the potential effect of the project's use of focused, shielded exterior lighting fixtures to eliminate glare and/or spillover. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, as designed, spillover or glare will not result from this project; therefore not creating a safety hazard and/or interfering with any views. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? The only sources likely to be inflicted on the site would come from vehicle headlights on adjacent rights -of -way; an occurrence which could be at least partially addressed through onsite perimeter landscaping. Bulletin #050 - October 17, 2016 Page 23 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESCI FEDERAL WAY 33330 810 Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Wray WA 98003 (253)945-2000 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed -- aside from the Applicant's commitment to a site lighting plan/photometric analysis and the use of shielded fixtures, as discussed above 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no designated or informal recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity — aside from playgrounds associated with the existing educational facility. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None; Not Applicable. The Applicant's proposal for a replacement educational facility will eventually include playgrounds and/or exterior recreational facilities to replace those facilities which will be demolished to facilitate the new construction. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: With no long-term impacts on recreational opportunities identified at this stage of the project, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. The existing Wildwood Elementary School building was built in 1967; over fifty-two (52) years ago. However, to the best of the Applicant's knowledge, none of the buildings, structures and/or sites located onsite and/or in the immediate vicinity have been catalogued or are considered to be architectural, cultural or historic resources. As part of an ongoing commitment to the community, FWPS recognizes the importance of cultural preservation and the District's role in dedicating and preserving space for community use. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no landmarks, features and/or other evidence of Native American or historic use or occupation onsite or in the immediate vicinity. No material evidence, artifacts or areas of cultural importance have been identified. Given the lack of known resources or demonstrated potential for discovery, the Applicant has not retained a professional assessment of the site. If any unanticipated discoveries are made during Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 24 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 801 Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLSFederal way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 construction, the Applicant will halt construction and consult trained professionals regarding the identification of such materials and consult with them on methodology and protocols to proceed with construction. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. 3o the best of the Applicant's knowledge, given the lack of evidence regarding known cultural andlor historic resources onsite or in the immediate vicinity, and the limited potential for future discoveries, additional research was deemed unnecessary d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. With no identified cultural or historic resources having been identified, aside from a commitment involving unanticipated discoveries and having protocols in place should any be uncovered, no additional measures have been implemented, nor are any proposed. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 25 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 14. Transportation Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 810 Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 a, Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The Applicant originally commissioned a preliminary traffic impact analysis (TIA) in July 2018 to assess existing conditions, and assist in the preparation of a final site plan, pending a final version of the TIA. A final TIA was prepared by Transportation Engineering North West (TENW), Seattle WA, dated November 16, 2018, and has been added to this submittal. Vehicular and pedestrian access to the site primarily originates from South 3001h Street, a two- lane east -west roadway; using access drives provided onsite. Additional two-lane east -west roadways in the vicinity include South 29P Street to the north and South 304th Street to the south. Military Road South is located less than a mile to the east. 23r" Avenue South is a two-lane minor collector 24`11 dace South and 2611 Avenue South are both two-lane unchannelized north -south roadways providing direct access from South 298th Street. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, the site is not directly accessible to public transit users. The closest public transit stops are located on South 3040 Street, between 2811 Avenue South and Military Road, approximately % mile from the site. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? The Wildwood campus currently provides fifty-eight (58) panting spaces; the Applicant's proposal is to increase parking by adding twenty-five (25) spaces, for a total of eighty-three (83) spaces. The new buildings will be located to serve as a buffer between the vehicular access to the sites and the play areas. The automobile drive for parent and visitor traffic at Wildwood Elementary School is located off South 300th Street at the northwest corner of the site utilizing an existing curb cut aligned with 24th Place South. This drop-off loop is developed to accommodate a long on -site queuing area. The bus and service drive is also off South 300th Street at the northeast corner of the site utilizing the existing curb cut aligned with 26th Ave South. Parking is distributed between a northwest lot, serving visitors and community users, and a northeast lot which will be used primarily by staff. Building service access utilizes the same drive as buses, but bypasses the bus loop itself. Fire lane access to the rear of the school will use the bus and service drive, passing around the southeast comer of the new school building. The fire lane is designated along the south and east sides of the western classroom wing of the new building, doubling as hard surface play area; a fire truck hammerhead turnaround is located at the south end of the classroom wing. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 26 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 St" Avenue South P���� ��N�oL Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The Applicant originally commissioned a preliminary traffic impact analysis (TIA) in July 2018 to assess existing conditions, and assist in the preparation of a final site plan, pending a final version of the TIA. A final TIA was prepared by Transportation Engineering North West (TENW), Seattle WA, dated November 16, 2018, and has been added to this submittal; including a project description, a description of existing transportation conditions within the immediate site vicinity, methodology used to derive the trip generation estimate, trip distribution, traffic operational analysis of key off -site intersections and site driveway intersections under cumulative impacts, and identification of any transportation mitigation measures to offset traffic impacts. The TENW study indicates under existing conditions, all intersections serving Wildwood were operating at LOS B or better, with volumelcapacity ratios (vic) within the standards for signalized (1,2 vic) and unsignalixed (1.0 v1c) intersections. The report did take note of two conditions which will be addressed with construction of the new facility; the lack of crossing guards during AM - peak pick-upldrop-off and the failure of existing driveways to generally meet AASHTO sight distance requirements. Please refer to the TENW study for a detailed discussion of proposed recommendations. 2018 Existing AM Peak Intersection Levels of Service Sludy interseefion LOS Dela sec VIC Ratio UnsianaOrea Inters! clians ## 1 - S 300'h St / 231d Ave S A WS A 7.8 0.29 #2 - S 300'h St / 20' PI S / West Driveway EB A 0.3 0.00 WB A 3.8 0.03 NB Left B 12.9 024 SB Left I B 12.7 0.09 ##3 - S 3001- St / 261h Ave S / East Driveway EB A 0.7 0.00 WB A 0.0 0.00 NB Left B 10.0 0.07 58 Left 6 9.2 0.01 Source: "Highway Capacity mnnuel", special Repar' 2.09, Transportation Research Board, 2010 2018 Existing PM Peak Intersection Levels of Service Sludy Inlerseclion LOS Delay (sec V/C Ratio tinsic,noli2_ed lnr�:rcb(�fipns # 1 - S 3001h St / 23,d Ave S A WS J A 7.7 0.02 #2 - S 3001h St / 24", PI S / West Driveway EB I A 1.2 0.01 WB A 2.6 0,03 NB Left I B 13.9 0.17 SB Left B 13.4 0.10 #3 - S 30011' St / 261h Ave S / East Driveway EB A 1.9 0.02 WB A 0.0 0.00 NB Left B 12.6 0.12 SB Left B 10.7 0.06 Source: I1i;$1,rWoy Caprjcily Manual'. Soccio Rc!.)Ori 209 Tr1r%:portrjiro S R.;scorc^ 8"0 2010. Bulletin #050 - October 17, 2016 Page 27 of 32 UHandouts\Environmental FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 810 Avenue South Federal Way VITA 98003 (253)945-2000 The tables below reflect the number of additional trips generated and the revised intersection levels of service calculations, for the horizon year 2020, based on current Federal Way standards. Wildwood Elementary School Trip Generation Summary Time Period In Out Totol Nea<dzly fatly 142 14_ 284 d rnt;:lov AM Pe i= Fiow of G 11e,,JtOr 53 9f l ✓'�iC.d ': Pm. Pe -ok Hout o Ger:v"t ar '13 Jr2EK-:� Pr 1 Peak Hour of Ad;c er. street rraffic j2 -4 25 2020 AM Peak Intersection Level of Service Impacts 2070 Without Project 2020 With Project Delov v/C Delay V/C sluox Inte'sect;on LOS sec' Ratio LOS sec Ratio I - S 300' St / 2 *-Ave S AWS A 7.9 0?9 A 8-2 0.4? f(7 - S 3LC-- S. / :4" PI S / West Crivn•: nv F8 A 7A 0.''` W9 A 7.9 0-03 P:3 Left 3 13.1 024 SB -eft I 3 13.0 0_;0 Rc jridnl--,�)k)t A 56 0 «i 03 - S 300- St / 26- Ave S / Ecs Dnve:a.ay ES A 7.3 0_210 - 0/3 I A 0.0 000 - NB -eft A 9 e 0.G? SP Le t I eftA 9,2 00, - Reind000ut A ini.:- _,� 'He7f -f / C; �; - � �� .L• ; -u•Z . 7•.7+4r.ir+4 reCnA � + in7157 •-+n]�oY' �-�s5rxr' 3X]r,^ 2020 PM Peakfnterseclion Level of Service Impacts 2020 Without Project 2020 With Project Delay v/C Delay v/C Stydy LOS fsecl Ratio LOS (sec) Ratio �gnInnlerserclionr I �~ 4W+�{I i�iiii'ifP�lirnC _ 300' $I 123, Ave S A TS 0.31 A 8.0 0.31 A'w; .7 - S 300-- St / 74-- PI S r We ,t Drveway A 7.?, 0."7 E3 WB A S.r, 0';3 NB Lett I 3 13.8 0- 7 8 S3 Left 3 14.G 0.11 - - - Rounocoovt - - •- R. 5.3 0.16 A 3 - 5 3k)G" St 1 26" Avc / Fa;l 04ye-way A 7.7 0 32 -- E W3 A O.0 r3.A - - Na LcH 3 11 ? 0 12 Se Lell 3 10- 0 % Roundcaout A 4.8 0.11 Bulletin #050 - October 17, 2016 Page 28 of 32 k:AHandouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 80i Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, and pending further permitting/plan review, no added streets public rights -of -way will be required. Proposed frontage improvements will be restricted to South 300th Street and include standard elements consisting of drive lane, parking lane, planter strip and sidewalk and possible right-of-way dedication. Mini -roundabouts will be installed at the west and east driveway intersections with South 300th Street to minimize travel speeds in order to meet minimum sights distance requirements e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No; Not Applicable. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Please refer to the data provided in the Applicant's response under Item #14d above. Under the Applicant's proposal, given the structured schedule - arrivals (AM Peak) and dismissals (PM Peak) - historically associated with educational activity, the Applicant feels traffic patterns and volumes for the new facility will generally remain consistent with data associated with the existing facility, with recommended improvements mitigating moderate traffic increases associated with increased enrollment for the new facility, along with related staff increases. The existing gross floor area built at the Wildwood Elementary School comprises approximately 50,382 square -feet (including the main building and portable structures) and serves approximately 450 students. The proposed gross flaor area (GFA) of the new school is approximately 60,322 SF with a student capacity to serve up to 600 students. Per published trip generation rates within the Trip Generation Manual,10th Edition, 2017. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), for Land Use Code 520 - Elementary School, there is no correlative basis to derive estimated changes in vehicle trip generation based on changes in floor area, but better evidence of correlation on daily trips and significantly higher number of studies based on student population. Based on TENW's extensive experience in reviewing K-12, private schools, and numerous community colleges throughout the Pacific Northwest, the best correlative predictor of increase traffic demand is student enrollment at school institutions. As such, as shown in Table 4, based on the net increase of approximately 150 students, the net fncrease in vehicle trips on a daily basis is estimated at 284 daily trips, with approximately 98 new trips generated during peak arrival periods (AM Peak Hour of Generator), 51 new trips generated during peak dismissal periods (PM Peak Hour of Generator), and 26 new vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic (i.e., the worse -case scenario). g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No; Not Applicable. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 29 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist 10 Federal Way PuNic Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) FEDERAL WAY 33330 8m Avenue South PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, aside from required frontage improvements, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. The City of Federal Way assesses a traffic impact fee rate of $2.00 per new square -foot of floor area for elementary schools (2018 Federal Way Impact Fee and Components). However the Applicant cautions that as an educational facility with variable enrollment and staffing, traditional trip generation models and square footage calculations may not accurately reflect the actual impacts associated with the new elementary school. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Given the nature of the Applicant's proposal - replacing an outdated educational facility with a modem, updated facility - the Applicant does not project any increase in the demand for public services - either during demolition, construction or future operations. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. With no impacts identified at this stage of the development process, and pending evidence to the contrary, no mitigation measures are required or proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer septic system, All required utilities are currently available at the site; including, but not limited to, electricity, natural gas, water and sewer service, refuse and recycling service, telephone, cable television and other communication services. Pending further permittinglplan review analysis and the installation of proposed improvements ❑nsite to facilitate new connections and to remove existing infrastructure, capacity of all public and franchise utilities is presumed to be adequate. Lakehaven Water and Sewer District will be providing Certificates of Availability for both water and sewer later in the reviewlpermitting process. Negotiations regarding the extent of specific system improvements needed to provide adequate capacity are ongoing and will be concluded via a Developer Extension Agreement executed between FWPS and Lakehaven. The site is currently receiving sewer service'from a single connection point (SSCP 1738) located at the northern perimeter of the site, directly across from the intersection of 26th Avenue South. The onsite portion of proposed sewer improvements will see a new line extending due south through the parking field; connecting to the new school building at several points; including a new 8-inch line extending from the building to connect to a manhole at the north edge of the playfield. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 30 of 32 UHandouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESCI 33330 80" Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253)945-2000 Preliminary analysis on the adequacy of existing water lines/service to meet the fire flow required by South King Fire and Rescue (2,750 GPM) indicates replacement of an existing 6-inch main in South 300th Street with a 12-inch water main, at minimum, from 23ro Avenue South, eastward to 26th Avenue South. An additional 12-inch main may be required onsite as well. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Please refer to the civil engineering plans provided with this submittal — particularly the cover sheet where utilities and contacts are typically itemized, and the preliminary utility plans (water, sewer and stormwater) for specific details on proposed utility connections and the extent of necessary public improvements. Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 31 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS C. SIGNATURE Federal Way Public Schools Educational Service Center (ESC) 33330 80' Avenue South Federal Way WA 99003 (253)945-2000 The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: -' J Name of Signee: Robert McNeill Position and Agency/Organization: Senior Planner, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. Date Submitted: September 25, 2018; revised January 7, 2019 Bulletin #050 — October 17, 2016 Page 32 of 32 k:\Handouts\Environmental Checklist h FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CBRE[HEEIY 1D Task Duration Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors _ %Complete lad Pl+O 1st14s1 Psi P.." IsI HAP 1nda " 14 H.0 1 r9 660 days MIRROR LAKE/IAXf 6ROVE/WILDWOOD 660 days Mon 2/19/18 Fri B/28/20 7% — - ...r.... 2 to r� 3 463 days Ed Spec' Development 63 days Fri 3/9/18 Tue 6/5/18 49% T1 4 ✓ 4 0 days Ed Spec Harvest LGV 0 days Mon 3/26/18 Mon 3/26/18 100% a 3/26 5 ✓ 0 days Ed Spec Harvest MIR 0 days Tue 3/27/18 Tue 3/27/19 100% 327 6 ✓ 4 0 days Ed Spec Harvest W IL 0 days Tue 3/27/18 Tue 3/27/18 100% ® 3/27 7 ✓ 4 1 day Draft Programmatic Requirements 1 day Fri 3/9/18 Fri 3/9/18 100% a ✓ 4 1 day Feasibility Study 1 day Fri 3/16/18 Fri 3/16/18 100% 9 ✓ 4 1 day Preliminary Cost Model 1 day Fri 5/4/18 Fri 5/4/18 100% 10 ✓ °; 28 days Draft Ed Specs 28 days Wed 3/28/18 Fri 5/4/18 5 100% + 11 ✓ 4 3 days Ed Spec Recommendations 3 days Mon 5/7/18 Wed 5/9/18 10 100% ' 12 , 5 days Supt Review 5 days Thu 5/10/18 Wed 5/16/18 11 100% 13 ✓ 4 1 day Supt Recommendation 1 day Thu 5/17/18 Thu 5/17/18 12 100% ' 14 4 0 days Final Ed Specs to School Board 0 days Thu 5/17/18 Thu 5/17/18 13 0% ; 5/17 15 4 0 days Board Approval 0 days Tue 6/5/18 Tue 6/5/18 14FS+13 days 0% $ 6/5 16 4 17 4 130 days Draft Design Standards 130 days Tue 4/24/18 Mon 10/22/18 1096' r1 16 4 109 days Capital Projects Team Drags Standards 109 days Tue 4/24/18 Fri 9/21/18 11% - 19 4 2 wks Supt Review 2 wits Mon 9/24/18 Fri 10/5/18 18 0% ' 20 _ 4 1 day Supt Recommendation to Board 1 day Mon 10/22/18 Mon 10/22/18 19F5+2 wks 0% ' 21 4 0 days Board Approval 0 days Mon 10/22/18 Mon 10/22/18 20 0% O 10/22 22 4 23 ✓ 4 18 days Design Overslgllt Committee (DOC) 18 days Mon 3/5/18 Thu 3/29/18 100% P1 24 ✓ 4 0 days DOC Meeting #1 0 days Mon 3/5/18 Mon 3/5/18 100% ra 3/5 25 ✓ -e 0 days DOC Meeting #2 0 days Mon 3/12/18 Mon 3/12/18 100% O 3/12 26 ✓ 0 days DOC Meeting 43 0 days Mon 3/19/18 Mon 3/19/18 100% ® 3/19 27 ✓ 4 0 days DOC Meeting #4 0 days Thu 3/29/1B Thu 3/29/18 100% 0 3/29 28 4 29 ✓ 4 16 days Design Review Committee (DRC) 16 days Mon 4/16/18 Tue 5/8/18 100% t1 30 ✓ 4 0days DRC Meeting III (Complete) 0days Mon 4/16/18 Mon 4/16/19 100% 44/16 31 ✓ 4 0 days DRC Meeting #2 (Complete) 0 days Mon 4/30/18 Man 4/30/18 100% O 4130 32 ✓ 4 0 days DRC Meeting #3 (Complete) 0 days Tue 5/8/18 Tue 5/8/18 100% a 5/8 Task Pmject5ummary Manual Task L I Start -only C Deadne Project. ESs draft schedule Split ................. Inactive Task Duration -only Finish -only ] progress Date. Fri 1/4/19 Milestone 7 Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Summary Inactive Summary Manual Summary r -------1 External Milestone Page 1 --- - . -- ----- ---- - --- _ CBREIiiEERY FEDERAL WAY PU6LIC SCHOOLS t0 O Task D—'-on Task Name Start Finish Predecessor{ %Complete 2nd Hall 1st Hall 2nd Half 1st Half -2nd HaR _llst Half 33 _ 34 ,P 300 days GCCM Approval and pracurernent 3W days Mw 2/t9/12 Fri 4/1.2/19 94% —� 35 4J 4 15 days Prep PRC Application 15 days Mon 4/2/18 Fri 4120/18 100% - M d -a 0 days Submit Application 0 days Fri 4/20/18 Fri 4/20/18 35 100% 94120 37 V 4 0 days PRC Hearing 0 days Thu 5124/18 Thu 5/24/18 100% a 5/24 3a V 4 0 days PRC Approval Letter 0 days Wed 6/6/18 Wed 6/6/18 37F5+2 wits 100% 6/6 39 „/ 4 2 days Advertising & RFP Distribution 2 days Thu 5/24/18 Fri 5/25/18 37 100% 40 >.: 4 3 wits GCCM Responses 3 wits Mon 5128118 Fri 6/15/18 39 100% 4T >f 4 2 days Interviews 2 days Thu 6/28/18 Fri 6/29118 40FSrB days 100% 42 >,I 4 5 days Capital Projects Team Summary and Recommendation 5 days Mon 7/2/18 Fri 7/6/18 41 100% d3 y/ 4 4days Notice of Intent to Award 4days Mon 7/9/18 Thu 7/12/18 42 100% 44 V 4 0 days Board Approval 0 days Tue 7/24/18 Tue 7/24/18 43FSr8 days 100% 7/24 AS V 4 0 days GCCM Award 0 days Tue 7/24/18 Tue 7/24/18 44 100% O 7/24 46 41 46 -, 1 day Meeting with Consultants 1 day Tue 5/29/18 Tue 5/29/18 100% 49 a! 4 33 days Pre -Application Meetings) 33 days Wed 5130118 Fri 7/13/19 48 100% So 4 54 days Application Materials & SEPA Checklist Finalized 54 days Mon 7116/18 Thu 9/27/18 49 22% - 51 4 0 days SEPA Review Application Submitted 0 days Thu 9/27/18 Thu 9/27/18 50 0% 52 4 2 days Completeness Determination issued 2 days Fri 9/28/18 Mon 10/1118 51 0% 4, 53 4 0days Notice of Application Distributed 0days Mon 10/1/18 Mon 10/1/18 52 0% ar 10/1 54 4 16 days Comment Period 16 days Tue 10/2/18 Tue 10/23/18 53 0% T SS 4 10 days Review and Revise SEPA 10 days Tue 12/25/18 Mon 1/7/19 0%' t ii 14 15 days Appeal Period 15 days Tue 1/8/19 Mon 1/28/19 55 0% T Sy 4 0 days Final Completion 0 days Man 1/28119 Mon 1/28/19 56 0% p 1/2B Si 4 S9 4- ~ - - i._ �1 60 4 2 wks Certify Gross Square Footage 2 wks Mon 6/4/18 Fri 6/15/18 I00% - 61 yI 4 0 days D3 0 days Mon 9/3/18 Mon 9/3/18 100% 0, 9/3 i2 4 3 wits D4 (OSPI) 3 wits Mon 9/3/18 Fri 9/21/18 61 0% 1 a3 4 0 days DS 0 days Mon 1/7/19 Mon 1/7/19 0% o 64 4 4 wks D6 (OSPI) 4 wits Mon 1/7/19 Fri 2/1/19 63 0% ' Task Project Summary Manual Task I t 7-7-74 Start -only E Pfa�r L Project ESs draft schedule Split I—[w Task Duration -only - '- '•' Rash -only 7 Progress Date: Fri 1/4/19 AMestone 9 Inactive Milestone Manual SummaryRalWp Ctemal Tasks Moral Progress Summary Inactive Summary Manual Summary f--------1 Ftemal Milestone Page 2 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CBRE I HEERY ID ® Task Duration TµtiN&ne Duration Start Finish predecessors ♦Complete 2nd Ha11 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Hall end Half 11t Half 65 43 days D7 3 days Mon 2/4/19 Wed 2/6/19 64 0% 66 14 2 wks DB (OSPI) 2 wks Thu 2/7/19 Wed 2120/19 65 0% 67 40 days D9 0 days Fri 3/15/19 Fri 3/15/19 0% ♦ 3/15 68 4 4 wks D1O (OSPI) 4 wks Fri 3/15/19 Thu 4/11/19 67 0% .. 69 70 _ T.... 71 4 23 wks SD Package Development 23 wks Mon 4/16/18 Fri 9/21/18 16% — 72 4 0 days DRC Meeting LGV 0 days Tue 6/5/18 Tue 6/5/18 100% 0 6/5 73 a/ 4 0days DRC Meeting WIL/MIR 0days Wed 6/6/18 Wed 6/6/18 100% O 6/6 74 u/ 4 0days DRC Meeting MIR/LGV/WIL(Concepts) 0days Tue 6/19/18 Tue 6/19/18 100% 6/19 75 4 0days DOC Meeting MIR/LGV/WIL(Concepts) 0days Mon 6/25118 Mon 6/25/18 100% ry 6/25 76 -a 0 days Architect SD Package Submital 0 days Fri 9/21/18 Fri 9/21/18 71 0% a; 9121 77 11 6 days SD Package Cost Review 6 days Thu 9/13/18 Thu 9/20/18 76FS-7 days 0% ., 1 78 % 0 days Supt. Review/Approval of SD Package 0 days Fri 9/21/18 Fri 9/21/18 77FS-1 day,76FS, 0% 4'9/21 79 0 days Final SD Package for Review/Approval-Board&Submitted to City of Federal WO days Tue 9/25/18 Tue 9/25/18 78FS+3 days 0% 9 9/25 80 1/ n 1 day M&O Meeting 1 day Mon 8/20/18 Mon 8/20/18 100% 81 0/ 4 1 day M&O Meeting 1 day Tue 8/21/18 Tue 8/21/18 80 100% 82 e/ 4 1 day Pre -Application Meeting with Federal Way Permit Center 1 day Thu 8/23/18 Thu 8/23/18 100% 83 a; 85 4 37 days DD Package Development 37 days Wed 9/26/18 Thu 11/15/18 79 0% - 86 4 1 day User Meeting (MIR) 1 day Tue 10/2/18 Tue 10/2/18 78F5+7 days 0% 87 a% 1 day User Meeting (WIL) 1 day Wed 10/3/18 Wed 10/3/18 86 0% 88 4 1 day User Meeting (LGV) 1 day Thu 10/4/18 Thu 10/4/18 87 0% 89 1 1 day M&O meeting I day Mon 10/15/18 Mon 10/15/19 88FS+6 days 0% 90 1 day DRC (MIR) 1 day Tue 10/16/18 Tue 10/16/18 89 0% 91 1 day DRC (WIL) 1 day Wed 10/17/18 Wed 10/17/18 90 0% 92 4 1 day DRC (LGV) 1 day Thu 10/18/18 Thu 10/18/18 91 0% 93 4 1 day DOC (MLW) Materials and Finishes 1 day Tue 10/23/18 Tue 10/23/18 92F5+2 days 0%. 94 13 days VE/LCCA/Pricing 13 days Wed 10/24/18 Fri 11/9/18 93 0% 95 1 day 100% DD Draft Package 1 day Mon 11/12/18 Mon 11/12/18 94 0% 96 4 1 day 100 %DD Package Submit to Superintendent 1 day Tue 11/13/18 Tue 11/13/18 95 0% Task Pmject Summary Manual Task C :.:- _ _'_ 1 Start -only L D"dW L Project: ESs draft schedule Split • • • . I—W. Task Duration -only — - Finish -only 3 progress Date: Fri 1/4/19 M4eslone A Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Mufw[Ptogfea Summary Inacrrve Summary Manual Summary 1-1 Exlemal Milertone Page 3 ^CBREIHEERY FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ID U Taak Duration *a+k Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors %Complete, 2nd Half 1st H111 2nd Half 1st Half 2d Half 1a1 "IN 97 ; 2 days 100% DD Package for Review (M&O, DOC and DRC) 2 days Wed 11/14/18 Thu 11/15/18 96 0% ` 98 F 0 days Board Review/Approval of DD Package 0 days Tue 11/20/18 Tue 11/20/18 97FS+3 days 0% A 11/20 99 y 100 101 4 wks 90% CD Package (For Bid) 4 wks Wed 11/7/18 Tue 12/4/18 98FS-2 wks 0% - 102 11 days Constructability, Review 11 days Wed 11/21/18 Wed 12/5/18 101F5-2 wks 0% 103 a$ 11 days 90% CD Cost Estimate 11 days Wed 11/21/18 Wed 12/5/18 10IFS-2 wks 0% 104 'S 1 day 90% CD Pkg Submit to Supt 1 day Thu 12/6/18 Thu 12/6/18 103 0% ` 105 Z 1 day 90% CD Package Submit to M&O 1 day Fri 12/7/18 Fri 12/7/18 104 0% ` 106 24 1 day 90% CD Pkg to DOC/DRC 1 day Mon 12/10/18 Mon 12/10/18 105 0% ` 107 14 1 day 90% CD FWPS Review and Approve 1 day Tue 12/11/18 Tue 12/11/18 106 0% ` 108 -, 3 days 90% CD Package Board Approval 3 days Wed 12/12/18 Fri 12/14/18 107 0% ' 109 In 1 day? 1DU% CD Pkg to Supt 1 day? Mon 2/19/18 Mon 2/19/18 0% 110 14 1 day? 100% CD Pkg to M&O 1 day? Mon 2/19/18 Mon 2119/18 0% ill 14 1 day? 100% CD Pkg to DOC/DRC 1 day? Mon 2/19/18 Mon 2/19/18 0% 112 14 1 day? 100% CO Pkg FWPS Review and Approve 1 day? Mon 2/19/18 Mon 2/19/18 0% 113 my 1day? 1D0% CD Pkg Board Approval 1day? Mon 2119/18 Mon 2/19/18 0% 114 a$ 115 116 t/ -4 0 days Presubmittal 0 days Wed 6/20/18 Wed 6/20/18 100% ,s 6/20 1 77 -4 4 wks Permit Application (From 90% CD Set) 4 wks Tue 2/5/19 Mon 3/4/19 101FS+8 days 0% 116 14 1 mon Federal Way Permit Center Review 1 mon Tue 3/5/19 Mon 4/1/19 117 0% ` 119 14 10 days Responses to Review Comments 10 days Tue 4/2/19 Mon 4/15/19 118 0% ` 120 13 0 days Resubmit to Permit Agency 0 days Mon 4/15/19 Mon 4/15/19 119 0% a 4/15 121 1 man Permit Agency Review 1 mon Tue 4/16/19 Mon 5/13/19 120 0% 122 0 days Permit Issuance 0 days Mon 5/13/19 Mon 5/13/19 121 0% 0 5/13 123 124 t-1 125 '4 6 wks 5u6mltsals/lielease Packages Coordination 6 wks Wed 12/5/18 Tue 1/15/19 101 9K 126 12 days GCCM Bid Packages 12 days Wed 1/16/19 Thu 1/31/19 125,101 0% 127 14 3 wks Bid Reviews/Leveling 3 wks Fri 2/1/19 Thu 2/21/19 126 0% 126 1!; 5 days MACC Review and Approval 5 days Fri 2/22/19 Thu 2/28/19 127 0% ' Tazk Project Summary Manual Task I I Start -only C Deadline S Project ESs draft schedule Split . ........ lnaaive Task Duration -only - Finish—ly ] Pmgress Date: Fri 1/4/19 Mlfeslone A Inactive Milestone Manual SummaryRollup Es —ITazks Manual Pvogress Summary I-1 Inactive Summary Manual Summary Evtemal Milestone Page 4 - f w- ----- CBREIHEERY FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ID 0 U* Duration__ Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors %Complete 2nd Hall 1st Hatt T+d:aait 1sl HIM Jnd Half IQ Hall 129 14 10 days MACC Contract Executed 10 days Fri 3/1/19 Thu 3/14/19 128 0% 130 14 3wks Subcontractor/Supplier Awards 3wks Fri 3/15/19 Thu 4/4/19 129 0% -• 131 -, 132 °4 133 -4 2 wks Vacate Lake Grove & Wildwood 2 wks Thu 6120/19 Wed 7/3/19 0% 134 19 10 days Mobilization 10 days Thu 7/4/19 Wed 7/17/19 133 0% 135 11=a 4 wks Demolition (Lake Grove & Wildood) 4 wks Thu 7/18/19 Wed 0/14/19 134 0% - 136 M4 4 wks Abatement (Lake Grove & Wildood) 4 wks Thu 7/11119 Wed 8/7/19 135SS-1 wit 0% F s 137 14 9 mons Site/Civil/Grading 9 mons Thu 8/8/19 Wed 4/15/20 136 0% 138 14 2 mons Foundations 2 mons Thu 10/3/19 Wed 11/27/19 137FS-7 mons 0% ► 139 14 2 mons Structural Steel 2 mons Thu 10/31/19 Wed 12/25/19 138FS1 man 0% 140 1.5 mons Concrete 1.5 mons Thu 12/12/19 Wed 1/22/20 139FS-2 wks 0% 141 m4 1 man Framing 1 man Thu 1/23120 Wed 2/19/20 140 0% 142 1 1 man Envelope & Glazing 1 man Thu 1/23/20 Wed 2/19/20 140 0% 143 n 2 mons MEP Systems 2 mons Thu 2/20/20 Wed 4/15/20 142 0% - 144 14 3 mons Interior Construction 3 mons Thu 2/20/20 Wed 5/13/20 141 0% 145 14 2 mons Finishes 2 mans Thu 4/30/20 Wed 6/24/20 144FS-2 wks 0% 146 n 4 wks FF&E 4 wks Thu 6/25/20 Wed 7/22/20 145 0% 147 19 4wks Systems Commissioning 4wks Thu 4/16/20 Wed 5/13/20 143 0% T 148 '4 3 wks Inspections 3 wks Thu 6/25/20 Wed 7/15/20 145 0% 149 14 4 wks Punch list Activities 4 wks Thu 6/25/20 Wed 7/22/20 145 0% 150 14 0 days Building Substantial Completion 0 days Wed 7/22/20 Wed 7/22/20 149 0% 151 14 2 days Certificate of Occupancy 2 days Thu 7/16/20 Fri 7/17/20 148 0% 152 14 4 wks Move and Occupy 4 wks Mon 7/20/20 Fri 8/14/20 151 0% 153 In 6.5 mons Landscaping & Remaining Field Work 6.5 mans Thu 4/16/20 Wed 10/14/20 137 0% � 154 0days Site Substantial Completion 0days Wed 10/14/20 Wed 10/14/20 153 0% 155 In 3 mons Closeout 3 mons Thu 9/17/20 Wed 12/9/20 150,15455-1 nrI 0% 156 14 157 158 —4 10 days Mobilization 10 days Fri 4/5/19 Thu 4/18/19 130 0% 159 '4 2 its Site Prep/Safety 2 wks Fri 4/12/19 Thu 4125/19 158FS-5 days 0% + 160 14 9 mans Site/Civil/Grading 9 mons Fri 4/26/19 Thu 1/2/20 159 0% ' Task Project Summary Manual Task I -. I Start -any Deadline L Project ESs draft schedWe Split •........... ..•. Inactive Task Duration -Holy Finish -Doty 1 Progress Date: Fri 1/4/19 Milestone 4 Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rallup External Tasks Manual Progress Summary i--------- —1 Inactive Summary Manual Summary &femal Milesone Page 5 - CBREIHEERY FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1D Tank Duration Task Name Duration .Sim Finish predecessors 9k COMOlete 2nd Hall 1,tHalf -2nd Han 1st Half 2nd Hall 1st Hall 161 14 2 mans Foundations 2 mans Fri 6/21/19 Thu 0/15/19 160FS-7 mans 0% F 162 e4 2 mans Structural Steel 2 mans Fri 7/19/19 Thu 9/12/19 161FS-1 man 0% 10 14 1.5 mans Concrete LS mans Fri 8/30/19 Thu 10/10/19 162FS-2 wks 0% 164 a% 1 man Framing 1 man Fri 10/11/19 Thu 11/7/19 163 0% 165 1 man Envelope & Glazing 1 man Fri 11/8/19 Thu 1215119 164 0%. 1% -4 2 mans MEP Systems 2 mans Fri 12/6/19 Thu 1/30/20 165 0%. 16? 14 3 mans Interior Construction 3 mans Fri 1/31/20 Thu 4/23/20 166 0% - 166 y 2 mans Finishes 2 mans Fri 1/17/20 Thu 3/12/20 166FS-2 wks 0% 169 14 4 wks FF&E 4 wks Fri 3/13/20 Thu 4/9/20 168 0% in 14 4 wks Systems Commissioning 4 wks Fri 4/10/20 Thu S/7/20 169 0% - 171 1; 3 wks Inspections 3 wks Fri 5/8/20 Thu 5/28/20 170 0'% 772 16 4 wks Punchlist Activities 4 wks Fri 5/29/20 Thu 6/25/20 171 0% 773 4 2 wks Vacate Existing Mirror Lake 2 wks Fri 6/19/20 Thu 7/2/20 0% 174 4 0 days Building Substantial Completion 0 days Thu 6/25/20 Thu 6/25/20 172 0% 17S 14 2 days Certificate of Occupancy 2 days Fri 6/26/20 Mon 6/29/20 174 0% 176 14 4 wks Move and Occupy 4 wks Tue 6/30/20 Mon 7/27/20 175 0% 171 !t 4 wks Demolition of old Mirror Lake 4 wks Fri 7/3/20 Thu 7/30/20 173 0% 778 14 4 wks Abatement Old Mirror Lake Site 4 wks Fri 6/26/20 Thu 7123/20 1775S-1 wk 0% 179 9 mans Landscaping & Remaining Field Work 9 mans Fri 1/3/20 Thu 9/10/20 160 0% ' 1!0 0 days Site Substantial Completion 0 days Thu 9/10/20 Thu 9/10/20 179 0% 187 14 3 mans Closeout 3 mans Fri 8/14/20 Thu 11/5/20 174,180SS-1 mo: 0% 1-k P jest Summary Manual Task 1 i Start -any Deadline L Project: ESs draft schedule Split ..... ..... Inactive Task Duratirn-only Finish -any I Progress Date: Fri 1/4/19 West— ? Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup f darnel Tasks Manual Progress Summary—i Inactive Summary Manual Summary Extemal Milestone Page 6 h FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2ndyalf _tst Had - 'ZdHalf tf_tjfalL _ 2n0_HW _ 7at Half 2nd_Half 1st Helf_ 2rd Haa - tst 4.9 '2pd Hi Gma- Task Pmje summary Manual Task Start -only C Deadrine i Project ESs draft schedule split Inactive Task Duntian-only Fn'oh-only ] Progress Date: Fri 114/19 µ•estone Inactive Mile#ane Manual summary Rollupa® Pxtemal Tasks Manual Progress summary 1-------1 1—d. Summary Manual summary Ed—1 Milestorm Page 7 CBRE I HEERY 0 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2nd Half-_- Ist Half 2nd Half _ 1S-Half 2nd Half CBREIHEERY Task ilar�li�aY� project Summary Manual Task 1 7 Start-ony C DeadMe i Project ESs draft schedule sprit Imcrme Task Duration -any Plnisn-ony ] progress Dates Fri 1/4/19 µlesmne 0 Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup E Mmal Tasks Manual Progress Summary Inactive Summary Mamal Summary rzter-1 Milestone Page 8 CBREIHEERY FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Hatf _1st Hall -2nd Hall- 1st HaN _2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Hall _ 1st Half 2nd Half 1AHlf __ 2nd HaN /st Half 2nd Hag 1st Ulf 2nd Half_ - 1st Hal[ 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd Half-1stH.lf__ 2nd Hag 1st Half '2 Task PnddSummary Manual Task start -only C Dead6ne + Project: ESs draft schedule Spril .................. Inactive Task Duration -,my Finish -any ] progress Date: Fri 1/4/19 M4. ! Inactive Milasmne Mnual Summary Rollup Extemal-rasks Menial Progress Summary r-------- Inactive5ummary Manual Summary r — — — — — — — — 1 External Milestone Page B v v FEDEPAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2nd Hall '. 1st Half ZI dHall -1st Half _ jnd Half _19 Half 2nd Hall 1st "elf 2nd Hall - 1}111e11- 2nd Half 1st Half :2rd Half - Ist Hall 2nd Hpll 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Hall 2nd Half '1st Half 2ndH Task Project: ESs draft schedule Sprn Date: Fri 1/4/19 Miestone Summary INAMMEMS1116MM PmjmSummary ....., Inactive Task • Inactive Milestone f�1 Inactive Summary Manual Task Sert-ony Duration-ony F.ati-ony Manual Summay Nallup li enal Tasks Manual Summary External Milestone Page B C Deadfine 4 ] Pmg— — Manual Progress CBREJEMM k CBRE I REERY FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2rd Half_ -1st Helf ._ •2nd Half -1st Half 2ad_Half 1st Half 2nd Half _'1st Half _ •2nd Half _1M-Half 2nd Half 10 Half 2ngy4H lstyalf 2nd Half -1st-Half 2nd Haj - 1st Half -2nd Hall 1st Half 2nd_Hall _I,t Ralf d Half /sl Hall i A Y��a�a 17M2 rL,7 1,0/14 4m--d Task P jM Summary MawalTak Start -only C Deadline 4 Project ESs draft schedule split InawaTaak Darauan-only Finish -any 7 pnsg— Date: Fri 1/4/19 txkcwne ' Inactive Wmtane Manual Summary R Ilup Edernal Tasks Manual Pnag— Summary f--1 Inactive Summary Manual Summary f��1 Ettemal Milestone Page 6 Y - -- -- -- CBREIHEMY FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2nd Half - 1st HaH- 2ndHatf - 11t Haff 2ndflaa Is[ Half -2nd_Ralf 19H.N tad Half 1st Half_ 20 Half 1st Hall 2nd.Half 1st Half _ 2n01Helt _ 1st Hslf _ 2nd}1aH - 1st HeN _ 2nd Hal( 1_st Hay 2nd Half 1st Half 2nd HalL -1st Hall .7 TS Task ProjedS mmary Manual Task Start -only C Deadline Project ESs draft schedule spirt .........I ... Inactive Task Daratlon-only Fi.M-only 7 Pragasss Date: Fri 1/4/19 M,leswne • Inactive Milestone Marmal Summary Pallup Eatemal Tasks Manual Progress summary r -----1 Inactive Summary Manual Summary 1--1 Eriemal Mllatone Page 9 ARTECF RS dt D Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools N ® 909 Community Design Guidelines Narrative Narrative Summary.of appli4r� design Guidelines (FWRC 19.115) The new Wildwood Elementary School utilizes several design strategies to address the intent of the community design guidelines and create a building that incorporates a combination of facade treatments and material modulation to organize and articulate building bulk and scale, add architectural interest, and appeal at a pedestrian scale from adjacent neighbors and streets. The building creates the perception of depth and develops a system of material and color modulation to respond to the site and promote the goals of Federal Way Public Schools to create a safe, secure, and supervisable school campus by using the building as a buffer to street traffic on S 3001h Street and creating a welcoming and attractive entrance to the site. (19.115.050) Site design strategies achieve the general criteria established by incorporating pedestrian areas that create a safe and easily supervised entry plaza with fixed seating, clear line of site from ground level windows, and play areas that are clearly defined and secured with perimeter fencing. The organization of the building on the site directs activities to identified areas and creates clear site lines around the perimeter to discourage crime and unsafe activities. Landscaping and site elements have been designed to be well defined and easily maintained to create a project that will be well cared for by Federal Way Public Schools maintenance staff and be inviting to the community it serves. Surface parking meets the requirements of 19.125 by utilizing type IV landscaping and meet the requirements of 19.125.070 for interior lot landscaping, landscape islands, permanent curbing, screening, vehicle overhangs, and irrigation; submitted landscape and civil drawings show exact locations and dimensions. Parking and drop-off areas have looped access and driveways have been located to be clearly visible from S 300th Street while maintaining a secure and safe route to school for pedestrians. The primary entrance to the school is oriented to S 300th Street. The site has two entrances of off S 3001h Street, one for parent drop-off and one for bus -drop off. Both drop-offs unload onto a pedestrian plaza outside the main entrance and is easily supervised from the administration offices at the front of the building. Large windows at the ground level and second level also enhance supervision and safety at the entry. Landscaping is used between the building and the pedestrian plaza and sidewalks to soften the building and create an attractive and inviting arrival experience to the school. Sidewalks are used to connect the pedestrians arriving from the adjacent neighborhoods and connect all areas of the site. Bicycle racks are located near the building entry for easy accessibility and supervision. The service yard is located to the east of the building and houses trash, recycling, transformer, and generator. The Service yard is accessed via the east parking lot and meets the requirements of 19.125.150 and 19.125.040 by providing a screened enclosure and landscape screening along with roof protection above the trash and recycling area. Site lighting is provided at parking and drop-off areas. Site lighting does note spill onto adjacent properties; a site lighting plan has been submitted to show proposed locations and meet the requirements of 19.105.030. (19.115.060) The new Wildwood Elementary School utilizes existing grades and minimizes impacts to the existing topography. The finish floor elevation matches the finish floor elevation of the existing school. The building incorporates type III landscaping buffer around the site and type IV around the building. The main facade off of S 300th Street incorporates a canopy at the main entrance from the pedestrian plaza at the drop-off areas. The building uses material transitions, window shadow box articulation, and texture to breakdown the building massing and scale. The west facade uses the strategy of creating the classical architectural order of developing a base, middle, and top using material variation, texture and color. The base is a concrete masonry veneer that grounds the building to the site. The masonry base is very durable and creates a sense of permanence that is appropriate for a school building. The middle uses color and texture variation of durable cement board panels and planks to create the perception of depth and material modulation to the facade while creating a highly supervisable building perimeter to ensure student safety before, during, and after school. The supervision of this area of the site and building is a key element in determining overall building organization and site strategies to reinforce safety concerns along the west facade. The 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 • 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane integrursTUflE Statement of Architectural Design Intent Wildwood Elementary School Page 2 facade is articulated by color accents to breakdown the building scale and uses metal trim transitions at material changes and around large window openings to provide the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction required daylighting into the classrooms. The large windows create a rhythm that relates to the material transitions and strengthens the facade modulation concepts around the building. The windows are organized within the facade by the material modulation and articulated by a metal shadow box and metal trim. The top of the building uses the articulation of stepped parapet heights and copings to reinforce the rhythm of the material transitions, window arrangement, and color modulation. The north facade along S 3000, Street continues the strategy of creating a base, middle, and top by utilizing the masonry base and color and texture variation of the cement board panels and planks. The articulation of materials, colors, large storefront windows, an entry canopy, landscape screening, building recesses, and a large pedestrian plaza creates a clear and distinguished main entry and arrival point for students, parents, teachers, and community members when entering the site from either the parent drop-off entry or the bus drop-off entry. (19.115.070) The building is oriented towards S 3001h Street and incorporates the use of a pedestrian plaza at the parent and bus drop-off areas. The plaza is directly adjacent to the main building entry is protected by a canopy at the entrance. Large ground level windows and directly adjacent administration offices allow for strong site lines and an easily supervised arrival of scholars and community members. Landscaping is utilized between the plaza and building to enhance the arrival experience and does not impede line of site supervision around the building. (19.115.090) Unobstructed supervision of the site and building is a key element in determining overall building organization and site strategies to reinforce safety concerns along the west and north facade. To create strong site lines and to discourage unsupervised areas where there is a greater risk of crime and undesirable activities the west and north facades do not structurally modulate. The building uses material transitions, color, and texture of masonry, durable cement board panels, and plank to create the perception of depth and material modulation to the facade while creating a highly supervisable building perimeter. The facade modulation is reinforced by utilizing accent trim around windows, trim at material transitions, and organizing scupper boxes and downspouts with regularity within the modulation of materials. The roof of the building uses the articulation of stepped parapet heights and copings to reinforce the rhythm of the material transitions, window arrangement, and color modulation. Alternative methods to organize the building and facade treatments under 19.115.090.5 incorporate a majority of architectural elements from 19.115.060.3.b, such as, pedestrian plaza, entry canopy, and building articulation of large windows, trim to create shadow lines and perceived depth, articulated parapet, and materials variations of masonry and cement board panels and planks. The site implements CPTED design principals to create natural surveillance and access control around the building and to all areas of the site. A completed CPTED checklist has been submitted for the project. The building form and site organization work together to create a project that creates strong site lines, a secure perimeter to keep students and teachers safe, and minimize opportunities for undesirable activity, while creating a building that incorporates a combination of facade treatments and material modulation to articulate massing and scale, add architectural interest, and appeal at a pedestrian scale from adjacent neighbors and streets. 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 • 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane integrursruAe Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools Architectural Design Intent Statement of Architectural Design Intent Project Description The purpose of the project is to replace the existing Wildwood Elementary School for Federal Way Public Schools as part of the bond measure passed by voters in November 2017. The guiding principles developed by the Facilities Planning Committee serve as benchmarks for these projects. The guiding principles are advance strategic goals, learner centered, equity of opportunity, personalized environments, sustainability, safety, community connections, aesthetics, and fight size for growing communities. Wildwood Elementary School is located on the existing 9.38-acre site at 2405 South 300th Street in Federal Way, Washington. While the site itself is relatively flat or gently sloping, the east, south, and west sides of the site are bordered by dense trees sloping way from the school property. The site is served by South 3001h Street, a single street running east -west along the north edge of the property. The school is surrounded by single family residential development with Wildwood Park immediately to the west. Steel Lake is one block away to the south. The school property is zoned residential single family (RS-7.2), with schools being a permitted use. The existing school building occupies the northern half of the site and stretches east to west. The existing Wildwood Elementary School currently serves approximately 600 scholars from pre -kindergarten through 51h grade. The existing school was originally built in 1967 and opened in 1968 with various additions and modernizations over the years. The school was last remodeled in 1991. The existing facility is comprised of a single - story building with classrooms arranged along a double loaded corridor and four portable classroom buildings. Given the very limited site access and limited area to build a new school while the existing school is occupied, the School District has decided that the school will be housed off site during construction. Site Organization The automobile drive for parent and visitor traffic at Wildwood Elementary School is located off South 3001h Street at the northwest corner of the site utilizing an existing curb cut aligned with 241h Place South. This drop-off loop is developed to accommodate a long on -site queuing area. The bus and service drive is also off South 300th Street at the northeast corner of the site utilizing the existing curb cut aligned with 26th Ave South. Parking is distributed between a northwest lot, serving visitors and community users, and a northeast lot which will be used primarily by staff. Building service access utilizes the same drive as buses but bypasses the bus loop itself. Fire lane access to the rear of the school uses the bus and service drive, passing around the southeast corner of the new school building. The fire lane runs along the south and east side of the western classroom wing of the new building, doubling as hard surface play area; a firetruck hammerhead turnaround is located at the south end of the classroom wing. The north -south leg of the "L" is oriented along the west property line to orient many of the classrooms toward the wooded park. The shape of the building works well to define and contain the south facing play area, situating the play area between two walls of the school, the woods to the east and south. Building Organization Working closely with the Federal Way Public Schools Design Review Committee, the orientation and organization of the building was developed as a response to desired program adjacencies and the goal of generating a building that can be used as a buffer between vehicular access to the site and the play areas. Another common priority among the Design Review Committee was the ability to zone the building between the more public community functions, like the gymnasium, multi -purpose and library, and more private academic functions. The Design Review Committee 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 - 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane integrus ARCHITECTURE Statement of Architectural Design Intent Mirror Lake Elementary School Page 2 expressed a strong desire for shared learning areas outside of the classrooms to accommodate flexibility in teaching and learning methodologies. The basic organizational scheme of the building is a two-story 1". The two-story school maximizes site area and efficiency. At each school, the ground floor of one leg of the 1" contains the entry, administration, learning resource center (library), music classroom, multi -purpose, gymnasium and building services. The multi -purpose room, gymnasium, and music classroom, which also serves as a stage, are organized for after hour community use. Acoustical, operable walls separate the music classroom from the multi -purpose room and the multi -purpose room from the gymnasium to provide the opportunity to create a large group gathering and performance space. The kitchen and building services are located adjacent to the multi -purpose room and gymnasium. A covered outdoor play structure is attached to the gymnasium. The classrooms are arranged along a central corridor and organized around shared learning, or break out, spaces. Pre-school, kindergarten and first grade are located on the first floor, and grades second through fifth are located on the second floor. Pre-school is located near the main entry to minimize travel for the youngest scholars. Kindergarten through third grade have five classrooms each grouped around the shared learning areas, and fourth and fifth grade have four classrooms each grouped around shared learning areas. Pre-school and kindergarten classrooms have toilet rooms located within their spaces, and larger boys' and girls' toilet rooms are situated centrally between classroom groupings. At the intersection of the two legs of the I," the student services are centrally located and near the elevator making them convenient and close to most of the classrooms. The student service offices are grouped together to facilitate collaboration and support a "push -in" model of service. Three stairs are evenly distributed through the building to provide convenient locations for vertical circulation and to help alleviate congestion. With both the automobile and bus drop-offs occurring to the north of the building, the administration is centrally located for visibility and security. The main building entry faces north and is located between the administration and the multi -purpose room for convenient access to the cafeteria and gymnasium. An entry canopy directs building users to the front door, while providing cover. The main entry has a vestibule that can be secured to direct all visitors through a door into the reception area before access into the school is permitted. The learning resource center is prominently located on the first floor at the intersection of the "L'; it faces the main automobile drop-off and Wildwood Park to the west. The learning resource center, multi -purpose room, and gymnasium are located near the front of the school and positioned to allow extended use of the facility after school hours while keeping the rest of the school closed off. A family connections center is located across the corridor from the main entry. The two-story classroom wing is oriented north to south to take advantage of the Wildwood Park views to the west. Exterior Development The exterior building development reflects the buildings' internal organization and the buildings relationship to its site. The buildings material expression is comprised principally of concrete masonry veneer, cement board panel and plank siding, and window assemblies with an articulated parapet roof design and single ply membrane roofing at low slope roofs. The masonry veneer is used mainly at the first floor to provide a durable and low maintenance material where it is most needed and reflect solidity and permanence. The cement panel and plank siding is mainly located at the upper portion of the building to create contrast and provide weather protection while also being durable and low maintenance. A secondary accent cement panel siding is used to break up the scale and to create rhythm, texture, and unique identity to the school. Attic space for the mechanical systems is located on the roof and is fully enclosed. A canopy with a low slope membrane roof provides cover and expression at the main entry. The massing is based on considerations of the building height limits and the residential context of the neighborhoods where the school is located. The multi -purpose and gym spaces utilize clerestory windows to bring daylight into the 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 • 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane integrus A A C H I r E C l U A E Statement of Architectural Design Intent Mirror Lake Elementary School Page 3 large volumes. The covered play structure is attached to and integrated into the multi -purpose -gym volume. An enclosure screens the service yard, which is accessed by gates for both vehicles and persons. 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 • 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane ntegrursrVAr Wildwood Elementary School Federal Way Public Schools Height Exemption Narrative 19.200.090 Height Exemption Narrative per FRWC 19.200.090 Special Regulation Notes 12 and 17 The new Wildwood Elementary School projects seeks exemptions for the building height under special regulation notes 12 and 17 of FRWC 19.200.090. The project complies with special regulations 12 and 17 as noted below: FRWC 19.200.090 special regulations note 12. This use must comply with the requirements of the State Department of Social and Health Services and/or the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. The new Wildwood Elementary School meets all the requirements of the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) and the spectrum of activities involved in the planning, design, and construction of school facilities including all activities necessary to create a cost-effective school project. The project is in conformance with the requirements of the State Construction Assistance and Project Forms to receive state funds for school planning, design, and construction. Federal Way Public Schools has conducted a Study and Survey in conformance with OSPI requirements, developed Educational Specifications and District Standards that reflect the goals and objectives set forth in the Study and Survey document, continued Advanced Planning for anticipating future needs, and obtained financing through a capital improvements campaign. Federal Way Public Schools has facilitated a design process that incorporates all planning, specifications, studies, codes, and regulations required to design and construct a school that meets the high-performance standards of Washington State Sustainable Schools Protocols (WSSP). The project meets OSPI requirements to be eligible for state funding to create instructional space for unhoused students based upon current and projected enrollment of Federal Way Public Schools. The new Wildwood Elementary School meet the safety standards for public school facilities under RCW 28A.525.055. FRWC 19.200.090 special regulations note 17. Minor and supporting structures constructed as a functional requirement of schools may exceed the applicable height limitation; provided, that the director of community development services determines that such structures will not significantly impact adjacent properties. The requirements for school buildings per the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) include designing to the criteria of Washington Sustainable Schools Protocol (WSSP) and creates a condition that exceeds the applicable height limitations listed in FRWC 19.200.090. Per Section S1.6 of WSSP, the guidelines require the design of a building footprint that does not exceed 60% of the total building square footage. This requirement of reducing the building footprint minimizes the area of the site permanently disturbed by the building. The new Wildwood Elementary School utilizes multi -story design to achieve this requirement and to help preserve existing open space. Combining the strategies of reducing building footprint and minimizing parking to code minimum decreases the negative effects of the built environment on the existing ecosystems and creates more open space for school and public activities. The classroom spaces of the school are stacked to create a more sustainable design, the height classrooms match the height required in the gymnasium spaced. The gymnasium is located more than 100 feet from an adjacent residential zone, meeting the height requirements of FRWC 19.200.090. Additionally, the building employs a dual outside air (DOAS) mechanical system, housed in the supporting structure of the mechanical attic located centrally above the classroom wings, to meet energy requirements for a more efficient mechanical system design to meet Washington State Energy Code (WSEC) section C406.1 and energy requirements of Washington Sustainable Schools Protocol. The project is seeking exception to the height limitations based upon the requirements of OSPI and WSSP listed above. 117 S. Main Street, Suite 100 • Seattle, WA 98104 • 206.628.3137 FAX 206.628.3138 A Professional Service Corporation with offices in Seattle and Spokane r - �., r• r � � i � �4 �Wx •�, _ r� � ^ ,1 �. 'I�,.'1 � `.��.. �r �- r f r�+��--�. i . - _ h r��} �. _ a�i �t -� Y ;tip _fix, i ~•►" 111r44 Mr ib Vk AftIF Blow Aw :-i •... f yam• ry r �' VL • fF Allilill ••y. - i yr i ■ r, Air.,! . - qp r~ - ;� •� f04 u • dam- �1 _ y.ff�4A FRO � f.F '{.i- .. raw - Of fv *PAW Legend .�M ¢ 'i WK, - p ~ 225 Foot Buffer Ai Wildwood Elementary School f � � .r Wetlands Streams •� .r .r f Lakes Erosion Haz• Areas --Landslide Hazard Areas A, Floodplains r Wellhead - fE' ,.. 0u9,Clr:sti:g�,y�zcrax��n. ea�n:.sraovn:�. Wil r rrr Elementary School Pritical Area .1 ... ..... — :D A Hig7 r,�� �VE NIS,dd Lakehavenq��r WATER & SI WER DISTRICT JAN 10 7019 31627 1st Avenue South A P.O. Box 4249 P Federal Way, WA 98063-4249V OF E DEFIALWAY 253-941-1516 Federal Way 253-927-2922 Tacoma www.lakehaven.org COMM 140 prVEL&MEM October 23, 2018 PO# Mike Benzien OCT 2 9 18 FWPS 1211 South 332nd Street RECV BY:_ Federal Way, Washington 98003 INV TO AP: RE: WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — PO 18802269 Lakehaven Project No. 6318019 Mr. Benzien: Enclosed is the original Developer Extension (DE) Agreement for the referenced project. Please have the appropriate party, or parties, execute and return the DE Agreement to this office within 30 days from the date of this letter. In accordance with applicable King County rules, please do not make any markings/etc. in the one -inch (1") clear margins of the DE Agreement pages. You will receive a fully executed copy when completed. Lakehaven will process the original DE Agreement for recording. If the executed DE Agreement is not returned within 30 days the project will be suspended without further notice, and a new DE Agreement application (and deposit) to Lakehaven may be required. Execution and return of the DE agreement is required for all Lakehaven plan review tasks/services beyond the initial review. Pursuant to Paragraph 3, the required sum has been submitted to initiate the project. All actual labor and materials expenses, plus overhead, incurred by Lakehaven for the project will be expensed to the project account. Lakehaven will review the project account on a regular basis and issue invoices as necessary to keep the project account current. These invoices (sample enclosed) are due and payable as noted on each invoice and the account shall remain current at all times. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF AN INVOICE PAYMENT IS 30+ DAYS "PAST DUE", THEN ALL WORK ASSOCIATED WITH THE DE PROJECT WILL BE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE "DELINQUENT' INVOICE AMOUNT, INCLUDING ANY INTEREST, IS PAID IN FULL. For projects under construction, please be advised that any work involving existing or future Lakehaven facilities, including any new service connections/stubs, will also be suspended pending receipt of any "delinquent" payment(s). You are required to provide accurate "as -built" data upon completion of construction. To ensure this, a written statement from your professional consultant shall be provided prior to (and as a condition of) scheduling the Lakehaven preconstruction meeting; confirming that accurate data will be collected in the field by said engineer or surveyor, or employee under his/her supervision, during construction. The engineer or surveyor is also required to provide certificates of insurance as set forth in Paragraph 9 of the referenced DE Agreement. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificates. You may wish to provide a copy of the DE Agreement to the engineer or surveyor to inform him/her of the specific requirements. Lakehaven has updated the Hydraulic Model Report previously generated for the site (FF #343c, copy attached), to indicate the amount of new 12-inch diameter water main required to achieve the required onsite fire flow requirement of 2,750 GPM. Please have your engineering consultant prepare & submit water plans accordingly. When Lakehaven has declared the plan(s) adequate for approval, one (1) rolled (do not fold) copy of each plan sheet shall be submitted to Lakehaven for approval by Lakehaven (alternatively, the plans submitted for approval can be submitted as PDF files via email attachment(s)). A copy of the approved plan set(s) will be provided to your design engineer, and to your professional consultant for "as-builting" upon completion of construction. Lakehaven will use Mike Benzien - FWPS October 23, 2018 Page 2 copies of the approved plan set(s) for our use and in applying for right-of-way (ROW) construction permits, and other permits and approvals, as necessary. After Lakehaven has approved the plan(s), received all necessary permits and approvals, & all other Lakehaven preconstruction requirements are satisfied; the developer (or designated representative) and developer's utility contractor will be required to meet with Lakehaven representatives for a preconstruction meeting (typically held on the 2nd or 4th Thursdays of the month, 9:00 a.m. or 10:00 a.m.). At the developer's discretion, including any additional or associated costs, the "as -built" consultant and/or the design engineer are welcome & encouraged to attend Lakehaven's preconstruction meeting. Please be advised that any/all construction work &/or assembly of underground piping associated with a non-residential fire protection supply line (from, & including, the premise isolation device vault to/into the building) must be performed by a person holding a valid Washington State "Level U" certification. Enforcement of this standard will be managed by the jurisdictional fire marshal. Lakehaven also requires a (developer's) certificate of insurance in the amounts indicated in Paragraph 17 of the agreement; including Lakehaven as an additional insured. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. Said certificate must be received by Lakehaven prior to (and as a condition of) scheduling the Lakehaven preconstruction meeting. Lakehaven will not allow any new domestic or irrigation service connections to the water system to be activated until the project is complete and accepted by Lakehaven, or has achieved substantial completion status as determined by Lakehaven. The enclosed cost estimate worksheet is provided for your convenience. Please keep in mind that this estimate is based on information provided with your application and is subject to change as additional information becomes available. Changes in project scope or Lakehaven fees and charges will impact this estimate. Lakehaven fees and charges are subject to change without prior notification. Please read the DE Agreement carefully. Conditions and requirements are detailed and laid out in chronological order for your benefit, as well as for ease of administration. Please refer to the enclosed Project Checklist for items/issues that need to be submitted/resolved/approved prior to scheduling the Lakehaven preconstruction meeting (typically held on the 2nd or 4th Thursdays of the month, 9:00 a.m. or 10:00 a.m.). Please note that in accordance with Section W/S.1.A of Lakehaven's adopted standards, all requests for modifications to Lakehaven's standards, specifications, policies &/or Resolution shall be made in writing (Plan Review Checklist comment, email, letter, or fax) to Lakehaven. Please contact me at BAsbury@Lakehaven.org or 253-946-5407 if you have any questions or need additional information regarding the project or the enclosed DE Agreement. Sincerely, Brian Asbury Development Engineering Supervis Enclosures Ec: LPD Engineering PLLC Ray Vefik - FWPS Casey Moore - FWPS Lakehaven WATER & SEWER DISTRICT WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — PO 18802269 Lakehaven Project No. 6318019 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into in duplicate between the LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, King County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the District" and FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, hereinafter referred to as "the Developer", WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the District operates and maintains a water distribution system within its boundaries which can serve property of the Developer, and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to construct certain water mains and appurtenances at its own cost to serve the Developer's property, for delivery to and operation by the District, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that: 1. The land for which domestic water service is requested and to which this Agreement applies, is realty in King County, Washington, legally described in Exhibit "A" and generally depicted in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. By executing this Agreement, the Developer represents and warrants that it is the owner of record of the above -described property. If such representation of ownership is invalid, this Agreement shall be void as to the portion of the property not owned by the Developer. The Developer agrees that the District may require the Developer to furnish a title report for the property at the Developer's expense. 2. All newly created legal descriptions shall be furnished by the Developer and shall be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. Each newly created legal description shall be accompanied by a drawing that graphically depicts the legal description. 3. The Developer has paid the required deposit as set forth in District Resolution No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto. Said deposit shall be applied against actual expenses of the District, including all bacteriological testing and sampling. The District shall determine, on a regular basis, its actual costs associated with the project, including taxes, and shall submit to the Developer an invoice to repay the District for actual costs in excess of the amount previously collected. Payment shall be due as noted on said invoice. Off -hours labor, including overhead, costs for such inspections will be charged to the project on an DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 1 of 8 overtime basis. The Developer agrees that the project account shall remain current for the life of the project and delinquency of any kind shall induce work stop action/orders, suspension/termination of service or any other action necessary to effect collection of monies owed the District. In the event monies are owed the District for work on, or unpaid charges allocated to, the project, as determined by the District, Developer agrees that the District shall be entitled to recover such monies by withholding and making application for payment to itself, any assignment of funds, cash deposits or latecomer reimbursements otherwise owing to the Developer. In the event that the deposit exceeds the District's actual expenses, the District shall issue to the Developer, at project closing, a refund of such unused amounts. 4. Except as noted herein, all work conducted by the District will be performed during normal work hours. The Developer may, at their discretion, submit a written request to the District for District non-exempt staff to expend overtime for tasks and services related to the completion of this Agreement. Said written request(s) shall state the Developer's reasons for the request(s) that would qualify it as an "emergency" (e.g., "excessive" additional expenses for any delays in plan review (actual/estimated figures should be provided), approaching unfavorable weather conditions for construction, permit expirations, etc.). Each written request submitted to the District for this purpose should also specify any component limitations the Developer desires (e.g., request for plan review/approval, request for construction inspections, etc.). 5. In the event work and construction described herein is not completed within five (5) years from the date of application for this Agreement, said application date being OCTOBER 5, 2018, the District can terminate the Agreement without notice, the Agreement shall then be void, and a new Developer Extension Agreement Application, along with applicable fee, will be required to re -commence and subsequently complete said work. 6. It is agreed by the parties that time is of the essence in all matters relating to the performance of this Agreement. 7. The Developer agrees that all requests for modification to District standards, specifications, policies or Resolution shall be submitted in writing to the District. Such requests shall be reviewed and the District will provide a written response to each submitted written request. S. The District shall review final plans and specifications for water distribution system construction to be performed by the Developer under this Agreement. If preliminary plans are not deemed acceptable by the District, the Developer shall be obligated to revise the plans and specifications in accordance with design standards deemed acceptable by the District. In the event that more than three (3) items are found to remain deficient by the District on the third submittal of plans, subsequent review by District staff may be billed at a factor of 1.5 times the standard rate without further notice to the Developer. The Developer shall submit final plans for construction in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment), and on standard print media (24"x36" or 22"x34" size), prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. After the Developer has been notified in writing by the District that final plans and specifications have been approved, and all other necessary items have been addressed and resolved, the Developer and the Developer's contractor shall meet with the District's representatives for a preconstruction meeting before construction is commenced. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 2 of 8 9. The Developer agrees that it shall be responsible for providing to the District accurate and reliable information concerning the actual location of the facilities constructed. In furtherance of this obligation, the Developer shall procure from LPE ENGINEERING PLLC, or other licensed engineer or surveyor that the Developer has indicated will be consulting on the construction phase of the project, a written statement, which shall be submitted to the District prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, stating that accurate data will be collected during construction of the facilities to enable the engineer/surveyor to submit actual and reliable "as -built" locations to the District, based upon the information available to the engineer/surveyor during construction and also by field survey of the constructed facilities that are accessible at the ground surface. The Developer shall cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, a certificate of insurance for the engineer's/surveyor's Errors and Omissions policy. The Developer shall also cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, a certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the engineer's/surveyor's General Liability policy, naming the District as an additional insured as respects the obligations set forth in this section. The limits for Errors and Omissions and General Liability Insurance shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 for each claim; $1,000,000.00 aggregate. At the conclusion of construction and prior to and as a condition of acceptance, the engineer/surveyor shall deliver to the District its certification that it has made periodic field investigations and measurements during construction and that the "as -built" drawings submitted to the District, which drawings shall be provided in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment) and on original or fixed -line photo mylar, are accurate and reliable. The District shall have the right to approve any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor during the project and the Developer agrees that the District may refuse any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor or may condition the same on resubmittal of the certification of location described above. No approval of any new engineer or surveyor shall be unreasonably withheld by the District. 10. The District will make application for the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 'Right-of-way Construction Permit(s)'. The Developer acknowledges familiarity with the provisions of such Right-of-way Construction Permit(s) and agrees that it or its contractor's failure to comply with any of the provisions of the permit(s) shall entitle the District, in addition to the right to enforce any other remedy available to the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY as the permitting party, to immediately stop all construction activity on the right-of-way until the violation or violations have been eliminated and corrected to the satisfaction of the District and the District should not be held liable for any damages, either direct or indirect, for the delay and expense of such work stoppage. The Developer shall procure all other state, county and city licenses or permits. 11. The Developer agrees this Agreement shall create twenty -foot (20') wide [pipe(s) offset five -feet (5') from nearest margin] non-exclusive easement areas and right-of- way granted to the District for water distribution facilities and all appurtenances related thereto, as indicated on water facility construction plans approved by the District for the project, respectively, through, over and across the Developer's property. This easement shall be maintained in full force and effect unless superseded and replaced by another easement as determined acceptable by the District. 12. In the event an easement is required over realty other than realty described in Paragraphs No. 1 & No. 11 herein, such easement, in form acceptable to the District, together with title report or other sufficient proof of ownership of such realty, shall be delivered to the DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 3 of 8 District prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. The Developer shall be obligated to obtain a written release from any property owner across whose property construction is performed pursuant to the grant of an easement, sufficient to indicate that the site restoration on the easement is satisfactory and complete. 13. Prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, the Developer shall deliver to the District a restoration performance bond in a sum to be determined by the District after receipt of any required Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and/or after the determination of off -site restoration requirements related to the work described herein, conditioned that the Developer will restore to the satisfaction of the District, and state, county, and city agencies as applicable, all work to be performed hereunder in public rights -of -way and the District's easements. Form and contents of bond shall be determined by the District. This requirement is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held accountable for any such restoration. Should any restoration work be determined necessary, Developer will be notified to complete the restoration work. If such work is not corrected within the specified time, the District will perform the work and issue an invoice to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid within thirty (30) days of issue date. 14. Construction shall be performed in accordance with the District's approved plans, standards and specifications and only under the supervision of a licensed contractor experienced in the installation of water distribution system facilities and the related work. 15. Two (2) sets of materials submittals shall be submitted to the District as one package, bound and indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment/material to be furnished for this project. Each submitted piece of equipment/material shall be fully defined by catalog number and reference made as to its applicable section of the District's standard specifications. Materials submittals shall be submitted prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. 16. By execution of this Agreement, the District does not guarantee water service will be provided to realty described herein. In the event that any of the District's facilities, such as storage tanks, wells, and water transmission mains become utilized beyond their design or approved capacity or become inoperable for any cause, the District reserves the right to refuse any connections which would use such facility until remedial action has been completed, and the District shall not be liable for any direct or consequential damages which occur to the Developer arising out of such the District's refusal to connect or time delay necessary to take remedial action. 17. The Developer and its agents agree to indemnify and hold the District harmless from any and all claims which may be assessed against the District as a result of the construction or maintenance of the work described in this Agreement prior to acceptance by the District. The Developer shall maintain in full force and effect during the construction period, the following insurance: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance with bodily injury and property damage limits of not less than: $1,000,000.00 Each Occurrence $2,000,000.00 General Aggregate $2,000,000.00 Products -Completed Operations Aggregate Limit DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 4 of 8 Business Auto Liability coverage for all owned, non -owned, and hired autos with bodily injury and property damage limits of not less than: $1,000,000.00 Each Accident A certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the Developer's Commercial General Liability Insurance policy, showing the District as additional insured as respects the work to be performed under this Agreement, shall be provided prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. Thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the District for cancellation or expiration of this insurance. 18. The Developer shall notify the District the date work and construction described in this Agreement will commence, and said notice shall be given not less than 72 hours (not including Saturday, Sunday, or national holidays) prior to such date. No water distribution system facility shall be covered prior to inspection by the District. After work is commenced, it shall vigorously, consistently, and in a first-class workmanlike manner be carried to completion. The Developer shall maintain at the construction area at all times during construction, a representative to whom District notices may be given regarding construction. Said representative shall be designated in writing by the Developer before start of work. The Developer may request inspections during construction upon two (2) days notice to the District. 19. Testing of water system facilities shall be performed as required by the District and only after satisfactory tests have been completed and witnessed by the District's designated agent, will the work be accepted. The Developer agrees that at such time as the District has performed inspection of the water distribution system facilities & system connections and has delivered itemized punch lists to the Developer and/or the Developer's contractor, that the project will be pursued to final completion, including the performance of all necessary site restoration. 20. Upon completion of construction, the Developer or the Developer's contractor shall deliver to the District a guarantee in the amount of ten percent (10%) of construction costs or $5,000.00, whichever is greater, that a reliable contractor will make and pay for repairs necessary within two (2) years from the date of acceptance of said construction, arising from faulty labor or material. Form of guarantee is to be approved by general counsel for the District. This requirement is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held accountable for any such repairs. Should any defects be discovered within the specified 2-year time period, Developer will be notified and given ample time to correct same. If defects are not corrected within the specified time, Lakehaven will perform the work and issue an invoice to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid within thirty (30) days of issue date. This paragraph shall be valid beyond the release of this Agreement and until the District closes out the associated project account. 21. Upon completion of construction, the Developer shall submit, for acceptance and approval of the District, Bills of Sale for water distribution system facilities, mains and appurtenances installed and constructed pursuant to this Agreement, in a form acceptable to the District, together with such other engineering records and project cost data as may be required by the District. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 5 of 8 22. As a condition of District acceptance of the project, the Developer shall submit to the District a non-refundable warranty inspection fee for water, as set forth in District Resolution No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto, to be held by the District and applied against actual expenses of the District incurred to complete warranty inspections following the two-year warranty period. 23. In the event new or modified District easements are required over Developer's property described herein, such easements, in form acceptable to the District, shall be delivered to the District as a condition of & prior to the activation of any new or modified service connections for the property. 24. In the event the Developer requests and the District provides water meters for the realty described herein, prior to the District's acceptance of work, the Developer agrees to be solely responsible for any loss or damage to such water meters or their installation, which occurs prior to said acceptance of work by the District. 25. Work and construction performed under this Agreement shall not be connected to the District's water distribution systems until all provisions and requirements of this Agreement and District Resolutions, on the part of the Developer, have been fully complied with. 26. The District and the Developer agree that in carrying out the terms of this contract, the Developer shall be acting as an independent contractor and in no respect shall Developer be deemed an agent or partner of the District. 27. The Developer shall not assign this contract without the written consent of the District. 28. The District shall provide water service following the District's acceptance of the water distribution facilities for operation and maintenance and upon payment of the connection charges as set forth and in accordance with District Resolution No. 2017-1300. Said connection charges shall consist of the Capital Facilities Charge (CFC), Service &/or Meter Installation Charge &/or Deposit, and any other such charges levied in accordance with said District Resolution No. 2017-1300 or amendments thereto or any other applicable District Resolution at time service is requested. 29. The parties agree that, if determined applicable by the District, the provision of latecomer reimbursements for system facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement will be handled by separate agreement to be executed between the parties within a reasonable time following acceptance of the facilities and establishment of the appropriate latecomer reimbursement area by the District's Board of Commissioners. Any applicable latecomer reimbursement period will be limited to 15 years, or longer, pursuant to the provisions of state law. 30. Partial waiver or waiver by acquiescence by the District of any provision or condition of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other provision or condition of this Agreement. 31. This Agreement shall constitute an easement and servitude upon the property described herein and shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors in interest to the DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 6 of 8 Developer. This Agreement shall constitute an equitable lien against property described herein and in the event of nonperformance by the Developer, as stated herein, the District may foreclose said lien in the manner authorized by law. 32. This writing constitutes the full and only agreement between the parties, there being no promises, agreements or understandings, written or oral, except as herein set forth, or as hereinafter may be amended in writing. 33. Upon execution of this Agreement, the parties agree in the event either of them is required to enforce any provision or provisions of this Agreement against the other, that the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to all other amounts to which it is otherwise entitled by this Agreement, to its actual attorney's fees and costs, including those incurred on appeal. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 7 of 8 WITNESS our hands and seals. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Date: S 7uLwA44 0 2 t O State of County of w LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT King County, Washington Dev lopment ngineering Manager Dated: / I // This record was acknowledged before me on JaA44ki, a81 ( te) by �YYI �P A as Illame) (Type of Authority, Title) (Company Name) DATED: )� (Signatu Notary PLI iC Title My appointment expires f4o" Pt"C WAWftm rd E*km 09/9&M For recording in the State of Washington, the Notarial Seal must be fully legible and cannot intrude into document margins. Please affix seal in the space provided. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page S of 8 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD. TAX PARCEL NO. 0421049167 :1:Z9l, 41.4rd slgo:[�+pki � 7s701 2s.B49 f �6s22oOOoo x T�— 29855 0421049134 0421049204 30054 0421049153 10491 2328 0421049092 2329 7985100f SQ j" 30309 �" —77985100160 " n 04901p �-7 302322 I� EXHIBIT "B" fi8220330 14 29aa0 r68220029 29914 S 300TIf Sr r16 0421049167 2405 20�0Feet 6550001 2500 36550001 1 302ND PL T J7� 3 5500017 — — 655r0002fi ��� 951000901 ►- 2507� I 30316 I I SAMPLE INVOICE ONLY — DO NOT SUBMICT PAYMENT L�kehaven LAK EHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT Invoice Date. 3/3/2017 � Invoice Projects 63 inn..: udes raga ens arcwna arinn s r} Due Date: 4130017 Water Su6TotaI: $2,033-80 Wastewater SubTciai: SZ079.14 To_al Amount Due: 9112.94 Online payments cannot be accepted DEVELOPER NAME COMPANY ADDRESS CITYSTAZIP Projects Project dame 53® Project Charges: 31tDays East 30 Days LTD Water: S4,386.46 SUB $A,395A2 Wastewater* 5.1.551 S$.91 Y5.564A Total: $9,941.98 S17.57 $9,959.55 Proms t Payments and CZtFser Credits: 31-FDays Last 30 Days LTD Water: (52.361.32) S O-00 ($2,361.32) Wastewater: (," 435-291 mpg (33_d8, 291 Total: ($5,846.61) S0.00 (5 846.61) Total: $4,112.94 Ineicrd� accrued Interest rhsrges of 91,327.E on previous enpaid balance. For questions, please call 253-94 or email us atmookwakeim-arkotg To ensure prayer credit to your account please detach and rorum this portion with yourpayment Water Arrwunt 51,27425 Water lyderest Charges: $759.55 Invoice Date: 3r3W17 Seerier Amount $1,310.72 P.❑'ectil 6?� SEmer Interest ges.- $768.42 1 Total Amount Due- $4,112.94 Due Date: 4WO17 Please Pay: 54,112.94 ONIne payments cannot be soMud Please remit payments to: LiaKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT PO Box 4249 Federal "lay, WA 98063 TIN # 91-0874464 for propercrediting, please pay any utilityst3mce charges separately SAMPLE INVOICE ONLY — 00 NOT SUBMIT PAYMEM T Lakehaven LNATER & SBA Ei fIS T RN T Hydraulic Model Fire Flow Estimate Request/Reporting Form Requested By: Federal Way Public Schools Date. - 10/4/18 Location to be Modeled: proposed Hydrants for Wildwood Elementary — With Modifications Lakehaven'/o Section Grid: L/6 Intersection: S 300th St & 24th Ave S Add. Description: See attached map Pressure Zone: 578 Results By: John Bowman Date: 10/16/18 Model Run No.: Master Water System Model 2007.net FF #343c Condition Pressure (psi) Flow (gpm) Static 33 0 11 Fire Flow 20 3500 NOTES: Lakehaven's adopted level of service goals for fire flow rates are 1000 gpm within single family residential areas (including duplexes) and 2500 gpm for multi -family, commercial, industrial areas. Model results depict the theoretical performance of the water system under high demand conditions and are not guaranteed to represent actual system performance. A design professional should be consulted for site specific design purposes. The calculated fire flow capacity in the above table is based on a currently available residual system pressure of 20 psi at the location modeled. Fire flow capacities greater than 3500 gpm may be accommodated through water system improvements. 101618FF 343c - W i l dwOOC1(Form Update 1/6/17) LAKEHAVEN WATER 8r SEWER DISTRICT - DEVELOPER EXTENSION PROJECTS Preliminary Estimate - Deposits, Fees and Charges (2018 Schedule) Property Within the City of Federal Way 8.4% Imposed Excise Tax Includes C 1ryFW Excise Tax - Subject to Additional C FVY rxclae Tax Project: WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - PO 18802269 Date: 10/23/18 Prepared by: BIA Project No.: 6318019 CURRENT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT I TIME PAID I ESTIMATED ESTIMATED Water Amount Sewer Amount DEVELOPER.EXTENSION S (DE -MAINLINE) 'Developer Pre -Design Apptication $500,00 Fee With Application $542.00 Developer Extension Agreement Application $2,000.00 'Fee + $1600 "Deposit $2.033.60 *Charge(s) Payable in Lieu of Extension Water "Charge(s) Payable in Lieu of Extension - Sewer 'Developer Latecomer Charge(s) - Water "Developer Latecomer Charge(s) - Sewer "Temporary Connection [Earlycomer] Charge - Water "'Temporary Connection [Earlycomer] Charge - Sewer Variable charge(s). Project & property specific Prior to scheduling the Preconstruction Meeting R ^'DE Acceptance Guarantee - Water [Optional] **DE Acceptance Guarantee - Sewer [Optional) $4,000.00 $2,900.00 Deposit p Waived for Public A encies _ 'DE Warranty Inspection - Water 'DE Warranty Inspection - Sewer $330.00 $620 00 Fee Prior to Project Acceptance $357 72 DEVELOPER S1ON(DE-MAIN INE)SUBTOTALSI $2,933.32 $0.00 SERVICE CONNECTIONS newer bervice Uonnection Permit $280.00 Fee Prior to Issuance of Service Connection Permit $303 52 Water Meter Installation: 'Developer Installed Service Connections with Lakehaven Installed Meter(s) FIRE-PROTECTION/FLOW-DETECTION per meter 5/8' per meter 5/8" w/Meter Adapters per meter 1' per meter 1" w/Meter Adapters per meter I%" per meter 1 %" w/Meter Adapters PRELIM. DOMESTIC SIZE per meter 2" per meter 3" PRELIM. DOMESTIC SIZE per meter 4" $430.00 $460.00 $490.00 $710,00 $680.00 $1,030.00 $800.00 $2.380,00 $2,990.00 'Charge $466.15 $868.32 $3,245.34 Water Service Connection Installation: Lakehaven Installed Services and Meters per service connection 5/8 per service connection V per service connection 1 VV per service connection 2' per service connection 3' per service connection 4' per service connection 6 per service connection 8" $4,190.00 $4,430.00 $5,350.00 $5,830.00 $30,630.00 $33.620.00 $39,300.00 $45,480.00 —Deposit 'Service Connect on reemen s - Priv. PS, Temp, Service etc, $160,001 C s "County Document Recording Fee(s) Based on # of Pa es •R' ht-of-wa Construction Permit CIlly of Federal w $770.00 Fee 'Capital Facilities Charge:(per Equivalent Residential Unit - ERU Water: Lakehaven Service Area applications Sewer: Lakehaven Service Area applications Sewer: MidSewer District Service A ea a licat,ons $3,707.00 $3,509.00 $2,063.00 per ERU 'Temporary onnection a mer rge - Federalay City Hier- er $2,570.001 per ERU ERU CALCULATION($) ERU amounts for Non -Residential domestic d irrigation service connections are determined by Lakehaven using estimated domestic water usage figures provided by the ownedappllcant. One (1) ERU Is equivalent to an annual average of 248 gals/day of water usage and 210 god of associated sewer discharge (from domestic only). All properties with service connections will be responsible for any rental capacity charges for water usage and/or sewage discharge, as applicable, that exceeds the respective water or sewer system capacity purchased/credited/allocated for the property for each billing cycle. The ate(s) for any such excess water usage / sewage discharge will be as set by Lakehaven's Board of commissioners, and will be in addition to the standard base and volume charges. SERVICE CONNECTIONS SIJBTOTA $4,579.7 $303,52 TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE: WATER ;7 513.1 % - TOTAL PROJECT I E• SEWER -- The above figures are estimates based upon the information available at the time of preparation. Any change in project scope, requirements, plumbing code revisions, etc., may render these estimates inaccurate. Actual service connection charges shall be calculated at time application for service connection is submitted. Fees and charges are typically reviewed annually, and are subject to change without notice. NOTES: All deposits are held against and applied to actual Lakehaven labor and material costs associated with the project, including Lakehaven overhead. Actual costs for developer extension (DE) projects / processing are dependent on the size and complexity of the project, and there is no preclse method of estimating total actual project. All DE project accounts will be analyzed regularly. Invoices are issued monthly, when appropriate, with payment due as noted on the invoice(s) and the account must be kept current to avoid suspension of project activities Wor other penalties. Lakehaven 1 DE Agreement Application & Deposit. 2 DE Agreement executed by Developer. Agreement expires 1015123. 3 Water Plan(s) Approval by Lakehaven. 4 NIASewer- Man(.) A-- - 5 AutoCAD Files. 6 As -built Consultant's Guarantee Letter. 7 As -built Consultant's Certificate of Insurance (Errors & Omissions). 8 As -built Consultant's Certificate of Insurance (General Liability). 9 N/A 10 N/A DeVe!Opff Latt.eemef rL---e P igt( ) 11 ROW Permit - Water. 12 N/A ROW Permit eiAre, 13 N/A . 14 N/A EW site Easement(s)—SweF 15 WAIVED Restoration Guarantee - ROW &/or Off -site Easement(s). 16 Material Submittals. 17 Developer's Certificate of Insurance (General & Business Auto Liability), 18 Water/Sewer Utility Contractor Information. 19 IDE Preconstruction Meeting, PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION 20 Substantial Completion Request by Developer. 21 Operational Inspection(s) - Water. 22 N/A 23 Construction Record Drawings & AutoCAD Files - Water 24 N/A 25 WAIVED Warranty (2-year) Guarantee. 26 Bill of Sale - Water. 27 N/A Boll of Sale SeweF, 28 N/A Other Rite- Pfelee Gent infeffnatiefr. 29 On -site Easement. 30 WAIVED DE Acceptance Guarantee(s). 31 1 WAIVED SubCompl Guarantee. 32 1 SubCompl Agreement executed by Developer. Project Checklist-6318019.xlsx (Form Update 09-01-17) Page 1 of 8 46 Laliehaven Project Name: WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY 7 Project No.: 6318019 SCHOOL - PO 18802269 Project Tech.: BIA Updated: 10 23 2018 Notes: A. Any/all requests for modifications to Uakehaven's standards, specifications, policies &/or resolutions shall be made in writing (Plan Review Checklist comment, email, or letter) to Lakehaven. B. Fees, charges &/or deposits indicated are based on current Lakehaven schedule, are typically reviewed annual) & are subject to chan e without notice. - _{ _ _ -,i 9 :,_ --'' LTV.= � -, - - .. • - PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY LAKEHAVEN 33 N/A Lateeemer AgFeenqeRt Preeess. 34 Acceptance Inspection(s) - Water. 35 N/A i4rneepanee In r,.-..-,tien■s �,......� 36 ROW Permit Release - Water. 37 N/A RGW Permot Release SeweF. 38 N/A 39 N A Reee_ded Final P1aVBSP-/B n 40 DE Warranty Inspection Fee(s). PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCOUNT INITIAL CLOSEOUT 41 Final DE Project Invoice or Refund. PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT AFTER 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD 42 Warranty Inspection - Water. 43 N/A . Project Checklist-6318019.xlsx (Form Update 09-01-17) Page 2 of Lakena ven ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS RECORDED FINAL PLAT/BSP/BLA. Copy of the recorded final plat/BSI'/BLA. 39 1 Proposed/preliminary final plat/BSP/BLA documents should be submitted to Lakehaven for review as part of the Substantial Completion process summarized above, to be certain easement requirements are satisfactorily addressed. 40 DE WARRANTY INSPECTION FEE(S). Payment of the applicable DE Warranty Inspection Fees: Water = $330.00 [2017], Sewer = $610.00 [2017]. PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCOUNT INITIAL CLOSEOUT 41 FINAL DE PROJECT INVOICE OR REFUND. Payment by Developer of the final DE project invoice or final project Refund by Lakehaven, whichever is applicable. PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT AFTER 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD WARRANTY INSPECTION - WATER. Satisfactory "Warranty" inspection of the water facilities 42 constructed for the project, including correction of all defects noted during the "Warranty" inspection. If provided notice of any items requiring correction, please contact Lakehaven's assigned project technician, NAME (EMAIL@ Lakehaven.org), to coordinate re -inspection. WARRANTY INSPECTION - SEWER. Satisfactory "Warranty" inspection of the sewer facilities 43 constructed for the project, including correction of all defects noted during the "Warranty" inspection. If provided notice of any items requiring correction, please contact Lakehaven's assigned project technician, NAME (EMAIL@ Lakehaven.org), to coordinate re -inspection. Project Checklist-6318019.xlsx (09-01-17) iak�hw�n WATER & SEWER DISTRICT ITEM PR03ECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 1 DE AGREEMENT APPLICATION & DEPOSIT. Submitted by Developer as the initial step in Lakehaven's DE Agreement process. DE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY DEVELOPER. Developer has executed (i.e., signed with 2 notary) & returned the DE Agreement to Lakehaven. Execution and return of the DE Agreement within 30 days is required or the project will be suspended without further notice, and for all Lakehaven plan review tasks/services beyond an initial review. WATER PLAN(S) APPROVAL BY LAKEHAVEN. Execution and return of the DE Agr is required 3 for all Lakehaven plan review tasks/services beyond an initial review. Plan approval expires M D YY if construction has not commenced by that date, or M D YY if construction was commenced prior to M D YY. (Paragraph No. #) SEWER PLAN(S) APPROVAL BY LAKEHAVEN. Execution and return of the DE Agr is required 4 for all Lakehaven plan review tasks/services beyond an initial review. Plan approval expires M D YY if construction has not commenced by approval date, or M D YY if construction was commenced prior to M D YY. (Paragraph No. #) 5 AUTOCAD FILES. All related AutoCAD files submitted to Lakehaven. (Paragraph No. #) AS -BUILT CONSULTANT'S GUARANTEE LETTER. Letter from the engineer/surveyor who will 6 be preparing the construction record drawings ("as-builts") for the project following construction, confirming that accurate data will be collected in the field by the engineer/surveyor or employee(s) under his/her supervision. (Paragraph No. #) AS -BUILT CONSULTANT'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (ERRORS & OMISSIONS). 7 Coverage for General Liability ($1M each claim/$IM aggregate). Lakehaven shall be identified as the "Certificate Holder" and included as additional insured. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. (Paragraph No. #) AS -BUILT CONSULTANT'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (GENERAL LIABILITY). Coverage for Errors and Omissions ($1M each claim/$1M aggregate). It would be helpful if the Lakehaven 8 project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. (Paragraph No. #) CHARGE -PAYABLE -IN -LIEU -OF -EXTENSION PAYMENT(S)-WATER. Payment in the amount of $XX,YYY.ZZ for water facilities previously constructed by a publicly -funded project that 9 provides direct benefit to Developer's property. (Paragraph #) CHARGE -PAYABLE -IN -LIEU -OF -EXTENSION PAYMENT(S)-SEWER. Payment in the amount of $XX,YYY.ZZ for sewer facilities previously constructed by a publicly -funded project that provides direct benefit to Developer's property. (Paragraph #) DEVELOPER LATECOMER CHARGE PAYMENT(S)-WATER. Payment in the amount of $XX,YYY.ZZ for water facilities previously constructed by a developer -funded project that 10 provides direct benefit to Developer's property. (Paragraph #) DEVELOPER LATECOMER CHARGE PAYMENT(S)-SEWER. Payment in the amount of $XX,YYY.ZZ for sewer facilities previously constructed by a developer -funded project that provides direct benefit to Developer's property. (Paragraph #) Project Checklist-6318019.x1sx (09-01-17) takehnven ITEM PR03ECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS ROW PERMIT -WATER. Lakehaven receipt of the AGENCY ROW Permit required for water 11 facilities to be constructed for the project. Lakehaven will apply for this permit after water plans have been approved. (Paragraph #) ROW PERMIT -SEWER. Lakehaven receipt of the AGENCY ROW Permit required for sewer 12 facilities to be constructed for the project. Lakehaven will apply for this permit after sewer plans have been approved. (Paragraph #) 13 OFFSITE EASEMENT(S)-WATER. Lakehaven receipt of the executed offsite easement(s) required for water facilities to be constructed for the project. (Paragraph #) 14 OFFSITE EASE MENT(S)-SEWER. Lakehaven receipt of the executed offsite easement(s) required for sewer facilities to be constructed for the project. (Paragraph #) RESTORATION GUARANTEE. Lakehaven receipt of the Restoration Guarantee required for water &/or sewer facilities to be constructed for the project, in the amount of $X,XXX.00, on 15 Lakehaven approved bond form. Amount is determined by Lakehaven after receipt of all required ROW Permits &/or offsite easements. Assignment of Funds or cash deposit is also acceptable. (Paragraph _rt ) MATERIAL SUBMITTALS. Two (2) sets of material (shop/working) drawings, submitted as one 16 package, bound & indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment & material to be furnished for the project. (Paragraph #) DEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE. Coverage for Commercial General Liability ($1M each occurrence/$2M general aggregate/$2M products) & Business Auto Liability ($1M 17 each accident; all owned, non -owned & hired autos). Lakehaven shall be identified as the "Certificate Holder" and included as additional insured. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. (Paragraph No. #) WATER/SEWER UTILITY CONTRACTOR INFORMATION. Lakehaven receipt of the 18 contractor's address, email address, phone number, emergency phone number, and the name of the contractor's foreman or superintendent; including proof of current/valid state contractor license. (Paragraph #) DE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. Separate Lakehaven preconstruction meeting, to review 19 the water &/or sewer construction plans for the project, with Lakehaven Inspections staff. Lakehaven DE meetings are typically held on either the 2nd or 4th Thursday of each month, at either 9:00 a.m. or 10:00 a.m. (Paragraph #) Project Checklist-6318019.xlsx (09-01-17) WATER i_SEWER DISTRICT T ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS WARRANTY (2-YEAR) GUARANTEE. Warranty Guarantee on Lakehaven approved bond form. The amount of the guarantee shall be ten percent (10%) of the cost of water/sewer construction 25 or $5,000.00, whichever is greater. This bond should be executed jointly for water and sewer (if applicable) —separate bonds are subject to the aforestated $5,000.00 minimum. You may execute an Assignment of Funds in lieu of the actual bond. Please contact Lakehaven for the proper form, should you choose to utilize this option. A cash deposit is also acceptable. BILL OF SALE - WATER. Bill of Sale for Water Facilities on Lakehaven approved form. Exhibit "A" of the form is a new facility inventory report, Exhibit "B" is a 'de -activated' facility inventory 26 report. Back-up invoices must be included in order for this form to be valid & the figures included in any Latecomers that may be applicable as a result of the project. If back up is not included, this form will not be valid & Latecomer reimbursement amounts will not be calculated or collected by Lakehaven. BILL OF SALE - SEWER. Bill of Sale for Sewer Facilities on Lakehaven approved form. Exhibit "A" of the form is a new facility inventory report, Exhibit "B" is a 'de -activated' facility inventory 27 report. Back-up invoices must be included in order for this form to be valid & the figures included in any Latecomers that may be applicable as a result of the project. If back up is not included, this form will not be valid & Latecomer reimbursement amounts will not be calculated or collected by Lakehaven. OTHER RELATED PROJECT COST INFORMATION. Other project cost information related to 28 the project but not directly associated with any Water &/or Sewer system facilities construction (e.g., easement acquisition costs, facilities/pipe removal costs, etc.), submitted by separate report/letter to Lakehaven. ONSITE EASEMENT. On -site easements for Water &/or Sewer facilities constructed for the project. The on -site easement descriptions will need to be verified against the '`as -built" locations. Please have your engineer or surveyor prepare/compile legal descriptions and graphic depictions of the off -site property and easement areas, using a minimum one inch (1"), clear margin on all sides. Newly created descriptions must be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor with registration in the State of Washington. Also, please provide 81/2" x 11" 29 drawings that graphically depict the easements for the facilities. The legal property descriptions should be labeled as Exhibit "A", the easement area descriptions as Exhibit "B", and the drawings should be labeled as Exhibit "C." We will forward the easement forms for execution when said descriptions/depictions have been approved. IF APPLICABLE, Lakehaven will accept easement dedication on the final plat/BSP/BLA documents, in lieu of separate on -site easement dedication(s). We will require a copy of the recorded final plat/BSP/BLA prior to initial project ' acceptance, if easements are so dedicated. Please submit the proposed/preliminary final plat/BSP/BLA documents to Lakehaven for review, when available. DE ACCEPTANCE GUARANTEE. Payment of the DE Acceptance Guarantee Deposit(s), as 30 applicable: $4,100.00 [2017] for Water, $3,200.00 [2017] for sewer. Only required if Substantial Completion requested by Developer. SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION GUARANTEE. Payment of the Substantial Completion Guarantee 31 Deposit (Assignment of Funds or cash deposit) of $TBD-by-Lakehaven. Only required if Substantial Completion requested by Developer. Project Checklist-6318019.x1sx (09-01-17) t Lakehaven ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION (IF REQUESTED BY DEVELOPER) 20 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION REQUEST BY DEVELOPER. Developer written request (email or letter) for Lakehaven Substantial Completion status. OPERATION INSPECTION - WATER. Satisfactory operational inspection of the water facilities 21 constructed for the project, including satisfactory results of pressure and purity (bacteriological) tests. Please contact Lakehaven's assigned project inspector directly (NAME, PHONE#), for coordination of this task. OPERATION INSPECTION - SEWER. Satisfactory operational inspection of the sewer facilities 22 constructed for the project, including satisfactory results of pipe pressure tests, manhole vacuum tests and video camera inspection. Please contact Lakehaven's assigned project inspector directly (NAME, PHONE#), for coordination of this task. CONSTRUCTION RECORD DRAWINGS & AUTOCAD FILES - WATER. The original Mylar Water construction record drawings, which have been conformed to construction records. These record drawings must be certified "as -built" by a surveyor or engineer licensed in the State of Washington. The project engineer should first submit prints of said plans for Lakehaven review, along with Exhibit "A" of the Bill of Sale document(s). The originals may be submitted as soon as the prints are acceptable. Water-soluble ink and/or reverse -read drawings are not 23 acceptable. All related AutoCAD files shall also be provided for our records. The AutoCAD dwg format files need to include any cross-referenced or x-referenced files; any font files (e.g., shp, shx, ttf, or txt); -any plot style or configuration files (e.g., ctb, pc3, or stb); and other files referenced in any of the drawing flies (e.g., lin or pat) associated with the project. It is preferred that x-referenced files be bound to the referencing drawing file, and the drawing file(s) be clearly identifiable by name (e.g., project name &/or number (W_AsBuilt_01of07.dwg)) or similar naming convention, whether each plot sheet is assigned its own drawing file or all the finished plots are layouts in a single drawing file. CONSTRUCTION RECORD DRAWINGS & AUTOCAD FILES - SEWER. The original Mylar Sewer construction record drawings, which have been conformed to construction records. These record drawings must be certified "as -built" by a surveyor or engineer licensed in the State of Washington. The project engineer should first submit prints of said plans for Lakehaven review, along with Exhibit "A" of the Bill of Sale document(s). The originals may be submitted as soon as the prints are acceptable. Lakehaven will accept the initial submittal of sewer record drawings that are absent of final manhole rim elevations on paper media, but final manhole rim elevations 24 shall be provided on new Mylar record drawings prior to initial project acceptance. Water-soluble ink and/or reverse -read drawings are not acceptable. All related AutoCAD files shall also be provided for our records. The AutoCAD dwg format files need to include any cross-referenced or x-referenced files;"any font files (e.g., shp, shx, ttf, or txt); any plot style or configuration files (e.g., ctb, pc3, or stb); and other files referenced in any of the drawing files (e.g., lin or pat) associated with the project. It is preferred that x-referenced files be bound to the referencing drawing file, and the drawing file(s) be clearly identifiable by name (e.g., project name &/or number (S_AsBuilt_01of07.dwg)) or similar naming convention, whether each plot sheet is assigned its own drawing file or all the finished plots are layouts in a single drawing file. Project Checklist-6318019.x1sx (09-01-17) Lakehaven ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS WARRANTY (2-YEAR) GUARANTEE. Warranty Guarantee on Lakehaven approved bond form. The amount of the guarantee shall be ten percent (10%) of the cost of water/sewer construction 25 or $5,000.00, whichever is greater. This bond should be executed jointly for water and sewer (if applicable) —separate bonds are subject to the aforestated $5,000.00 minimum. You may execute an Assignment of Funds in lieu of the actual bond. Please contact Lakehaven for the proper form, should you choose to utilize this option. A cash deposit is also acceptable. BILL OF SALE - WATER. Bill of Sale for Water Facilities on Lakehaven approved form. Exhibit "A" of the form is a new facility inventory report, Exhibit "B" is a'de-activated' facility inventory 26 report. Back-up invoices must be included in order for this form to be valid & the figures included in any Latecomers that may be applicable as a result of the project. If back up is not included, this form will not be valid & Latecomer reimbursement amounts will not be calculated or collected by Lakehaven. BILL OF SALE - SEWER. Bill of Sale for Sewer Facilities on Lakehaven approved form. Exhibit "A" of the form is a new facility inventory report, Exhibit "B" is a'de-activated' facility inventory 27 report. Back-up invoices must be included in order for this form to be valid & the figures included in any Latecomers that may be applicable as a result of the project. If back up is not included, this form will not be valid & Latecomer reimbursement amounts will not be calculated or collected by Lakehaven. OTHER RELATED PROJECT COST INFORMATION. Other project cost information related to 28 the project but not directly associated with any Water &/or Sewer system facilities construction (e.g., easement acquisition costs, facilities/pipe removal costs, etc.), submitted by separate report/letter to Lakehaven. ONSITE EASEMENT. On -site easements for Water &/or Sewer facilities constructed for the project. The on -site easement descriptions will need to be verified against the "as -built" locations. Please have your engineer or surveyor prepare/compile legal descriptions and graphic depictions of the off -site property and easement areas, using a minimum one inch (1"), clear margin on all sides. Newly created descriptions must be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor with registration in the State of Washington. Also, please provide 81/2" x 11" 29 drawings that graphically depict the easements for the facilities. The legal property descriptions should be labeled as Exhibit "A", the easement area descriptions as Exhibit "B", and the drawings should be labeled as Exhibit "C." We will forward the easement forms for execution when said descriptions/depictions have been approved. IF APPLICABLE, Lakehaven will accept easement dedication on the final plat/BSP/BLA documents, in lieu of separate on -site easement dedication(s). We will require a copy of the recorded final plat/BSP/BLA prior to initial project acceptance, if easements are so dedicated. Please submit the proposed/preliminary final plat/BSP/BLA documents to Lakehaven for review, when available. DE ACCEPTANCE GUARANTEE. Payment of the DE Acceptance Guarantee Deposit(s), as 30 applicable: $4,100.00 [2017] for Water, $3,200.00 [2017] for sewer. Only required if Substantial Completion requested by Developer. SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION GUARANTEE. Payment of the Substantial Completion Guarantee 31 Deposit (Assignment of Funds or cash deposit) of $TBD- by- Lake haven. Only required if Substantial Completion requested by Developer. Project Checklist-6318019.x1sx (09-01-17) Lakehaven ITEM # PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS ROW PERMIT -WATER. Lakehaven receipt of the AGENCY ROW Permit required for water 11 facilities to be constructed for the project. Lakehaven will apply for this permit after water plans have been approved. (Paragraph #) ROW PERMIT -SEWER. Lakehaven receipt of the AGENCY ROW Permit required for sewer 12 facilities to be constructed for the project. Lakehaven will apply for this permit after sewer plans have been approved. (Paragraph #) 13 OFFSITE EASE M ENT(S)-WATER. Lakehaven receipt of the executed offsite easement(s) required for water facilities to be constructed for the project. (Paragraph #) 14 OFFSITE EASE MENT(S)-SEWER. Lakehaven receipt of the executed offsite easement(s) required for sewer facilities to be constructed for the project. (Paragraph #) RESTORATION GUARANTEE. Lakehaven receipt of the Restoration Guarantee required for water &/or sewer facilities to be constructed for the project, in the amount of $X.XXX.00, on 15 Lakehaven approved bond form. Amount is determined by Lakehaven after receipt of all required ROW Permits &/or offsite easements. Assignment of Funds or cash deposit is also acceptable. (Paragraph #) MATERIAL SUBMITTALS. Two (2) sets of material (shop/working) drawings, submitted as one 16 package, bound & indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment & material to be furnished for the project. (Paragraph) DEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE. Coverage for Commercial General Liability ($1M each occurrence/$2M general aggregate/$2M products) & Business Auto Liability ($1M 17 each accident; all owned, non -owned & hired autos). Lakehaven shall be identified as the "Certificate Holder" and included as additional insured. It would be helpful if the Lakehaven project number listed above is indicated or referenced on the certificate. (Paragraph No. #) WATER/SEWER UTILITY CONTRACTOR INFORMATION. Lakehaven receipt of the 18 contractor's address, email address, phone number, emergency phone number, and the name of the contractor's foreman or superintendent; including proof of current/valid state contractor license. (Paragraph #) DE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. Separate Lakehaven preconstruction meeting, to review 19 the water &/or sewer construction plans for the project, with Lakehaven Inspections staff. Lakehaven DE meetings are typically held on either the 2nd or 4th Thursday of each month, at either 9:00 a.m. or 10:00 a.m. (Paragraph #.) Project Checklist-6318019.x1sx (09-01-17) Lakehaven WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Is 0 _..;_ - QJA��_!!. W11173 !1:1 11�� .. ITEM PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION AGREEMENT EXECUTED BY DEVELOPER. Execution (by 32 Developer) & return of the Substantial Completion Agreement that was forwarded by Lakehaven on DATE. PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE BY LAKEHAVEN LATECOMER AGREEMENT PROCESS - LATECOMER WAIVED PROPERTIES. If applicable, identification of any properties deemed by Lakehaven to be eligible for latecomer reimbursement, but for which Developer chooses to waive its right to latecomer reimbursement. LATECOMER AGREEMENT PROCESS - LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR WATER ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES. If applicable, legal descriptions of all properties that are benefited by the construction of water facilities for the project. Descriptions shall be prepared on 81/2" x 11" paper, with one inch (1"), clear margins on all sides, and shall be labeled as Exhibit "A." If required, they shall then be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor with registration in the State of Washington. 33 LATECOMER AGREEMENT PROCESS - LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR SEWER ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES. If applicable, legal descriptions of all properties that are benefited by the construction of sewer facilities for the project. Descriptions shall be prepared on 81/2" x 11" paper, with one inch (1"), clear margins on all sides, and shall be labeled as Exhibit "A." If required, they shall then be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor with registration in the State of Washington. LATECOMER AGREEMENT PROCESS - LATECOMER AGREEMENT. Execution and return of the Latecomer Agreement by the Developer. Reimbursements are typically issued for each payment received and are subject to a payment -processing fee in accordance with the fee established in Lakehaven's current 'Fees and Charges' Resolution at the time of each reimbursement. ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION - WATER. Satisfactory "Acceptance" inspection of the water facilities constructed for the project. Please contact Lakehaven's assigned project inspector 34 directly (NAME, PHONE#), for coordination of completion of construction. If provided notice of any items requiring correction (i.e., "punchlist"), please contact Lakehaven's assigned project technician (NAME, EMAIL), to coordinate re -inspection. ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION - SEWER. Satisfactory "Acceptance" inspection of the sewer facilities constructed for the project. Please contact Lakehaven's assigned project inspector 35 directly (NAME, PHONE#), for coordination of completion of construction. If provided notice of any items requiring correction (i.e., "punchlist"), please contact Lakehaven's assigned project technician (NAME, EMAIL), to coordinate re -inspection. ROW PERMIT RELEASE - WATER. Written notice received by Lakehaven from (ROW AGENCY), 36 indicating satisfactory restoration of the ROW under their permit for water construction (No. TBD). ROW PERMIT RELEASE - SEWER. Written notice received by Lakehaven from (ROW AGENCY), 37 indicating satisfactory restoration of the ROW under their permit for sewer construction (No. TBD). OFF -SITE EASEMENT RESTORATION RELEASE(S). Written notice from the adjacent property 38 owner(s), indicating satisfactory restoration of their property (off -site easements) following construction. Project Checklist-6318019.x1sx (09-01-17) Lakehaven WATER & SEWER DISTRICT' ITEM # PROJECT ITEM DETAILS & DESCRIPTIONS RECORDED FINAL PLAT/BSP/BLA. Copy of the recorded final plat/BSP/BLA. 39 Proposed/preliminary final plat/BSP/BLA documents should be submitted to Lakehaven for review as part of the Substantial Completion process summarized above, to be certain easement require ents are satisfactorily addressed. 40 DE WARRANTY INSPECTION FEE(S). Payment of the applicable DE Warranty Inspection Fees: Water = $330.00 [2017], Sewer = $610.00 [2017]. PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCOUNT INITIAL CLOSEOUT 41 FINAL DE PROJECT INVOICE OR REFUND. Payment by Developer of the final DE project invoice or final project Refund by Lakehaven, whichever is applicable. PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT AFTER 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD WARRANTY INSPECTION - WATER. Satisfactory "Warranty" inspection of the water facilities 42 constructed for the project, including correction of all defects noted during the "Warranty" inspection. If provided notice of any items requiring correction, please contact Lakehaven's assigned project technician, NAME (EMAIL@ Lakehaven.org), to coordinate re -inspection. WARRANTY INSPECTION - SEWER. Satisfactory "Warranty" inspection of the sewer facilities 43 constructed for the project, including correction of all defects noted during the "Warranty" inspection. If provided notice of any items requiring correction, please contact Lakehaven's assigned project technician, NAME (EMAIL@ Lakehaven.org), to coordinate re -inspection. Project Checklist-6318019.xlsx (09-01-17) Jakehaven WATER & SEINER DISTRICT Project Name: WIL®WOO® ELEMENTARY SCHOOL o PO 18802269 Project No.: 6318019 Pr®"ect Tech.: BIA Updated: 1® 23 2018 Notes: Any/all requests for modifications to Lakehaven's standards, specifications, policies &/or A. resolutions shall be made in writing (Plan Review Checklist comment, email, or letter) to Lakehaven. B. Fees, charges &/or deposits indicated are based on current Lakehaven schedule, are typically reviewed annuall & are sub'ect to change without notice. PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY LAKEHAVEN1 33 NIA 34 Acceptance Inspection(s) - Water. 35 N/A 36 ROW Permit Release - Water. 37 N A w Perffift-Rekea : 38 N/A 39 N/A 40 DE Warranty Inspection Fee(s), PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCOUNT INITIAL CLOSEOUT 41 Final DE Project Invoice or Refund. PRIOR TO FINAL PROJECT CLOSEOUT AFTER 2-YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD 42 lWarranty Inspection - Water. 43 N/A Project Checklist-6318019.x1sx (Form Update 09-01-17) Page 2 of 8 RAMP DOWN TO EXISTING WALKWAY va , c,T_al�x pr-YlSl4 �i vN• E �.ti►+ fs] ri`ma y • N tNZI FLUSH CONCRET CURB (TYP) t � ,w 3zo j PARENT DROP/PICK-UP CONCRETE WALKWAY (TYP) br- CONNECT TO EX 6- WATER MAIN m t! CONNECT TO EX -rr:,E ,:�. •G.naa w me . it o.swuA. = rr n. nu SSMH IE 477.25 s d rr.aan � •,wale war..Ivrl a ¢.xs-� acs w]a Iw.e mn i� •u.xoa ..., F r CITY LOCAL STREET SECTION `X" 10' DRIVE LANE, 8' DITCH (EXISTING PAVED), NEW 5' SIDEWALK •rPW �T� rIR °nay .wry sza, xi eercrar smE �+,rr,ar_ r mee n r.:., Y _ _•� IRA Q,WQ;•.u1 W RSS >t E=44W Rs! ter• � - 7..� - Y.--'��1`� - CONCRETE VERTICAL CURB (TYP) f4�,,, ■.,, ,r ASPHALT PAVEMENT (TYP) 0-- FLUSH CONCRETE -CURB (TYP) ON �F ll� .i Sriiiir? rireGil�—il� IFIRE LANEI FIRE HYD SSMH (TYP) (TYP) it SS CONNECTION COVERED PLAY AREA •4 TO BLDG W/SSCO + " 8" SANITARY SEWER 8" DIP CONCRETE WHEEL STOP (TYP) HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT (TYP) 14" DOMESTIC WATER METERI SOFT SURFACE PLAY .. : • --.-- AT 1.09" FROM WEST -__- WING TO EX SSMH �Y HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT (TYP) PLAY FIELD k i N 4 0 1C 10 B3 SceJe T-40' -_o-� EX CMMLR (FLEX) EX COW" — — — — PRaPOg➢ COMM QILE]I) 2], RMSED CWMM RUE FIDGE ILE S'Or EMMM FFM RN® F106t HELGLII _ EX HuLam I r/i�r/isi//11 RLPOSO Buom COI CRr. PAVE]IEM BEAYY dm'ITYICREM ASPIWI (q mvmlr L; .J HUVEL SURFACM NUILH SURFACL SrrE VMLL VERIrAL Cm CM AND GUOER C y: PRE-SETI M BI/� MEEK a, P&W SML ns>wm Pm AWAAM WM cqm 9rs1 7YFE I If�Jli rACI ar mE 2 slola, BR1a:r� ]crF11lN FM31fY «_ CRA2+ ruvvur a FJCI4IG OFMI Q-E, 7 vaxr�ours ddk4Kff smE � FPE --- soe Sr71ER cmm9mm wmw �muig Rrnmcs mum sent-- UBa VkWi NErrR sm SERVICE R16 FIRE SERVICE IRE FM SERVICE MILT RE SERVICE camwom a. a K-, Whal's bel- CaU Mo business days b=fore you dg. SCHEMATIC DESIGN �^ J � O o CU LLJ C 553 m _ Lu L L Ck J w LJ.. D� R1brm1B Ebb - 2173E Oran Br MNF R+dN dl JLA - � Rrldns � PAVING & UTILITY PLAN 1�AmlwI WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — PO 18802269 Lakehaven Project No. 6318019 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into in duplicate between the LAKEHAVEN WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT, King County, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the District" and FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, hereinafter referred to as "the Developer". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the District operates and maintains a water distribution system within its boundaries which can serve property of the Developer, and WHEREAS, the Developer desires to construct certain water mains and appurtenances at its own cost to serve the Developer's property, for delivery to and operation by the District, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that: 1. The land for which domestic water service is requested and to which this Agreement applies, is realty in King County, Washington, legally described in Exhibit "A" and generally depicted in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. By executing this Agreement, the Developer represents and warrants that it is the owner of record of the above -described property. If such representation of ownership is invalid, this Agreement shall be void as to the portion of the property not owned by the Developer. The Developer agrees that the District may require the Developer to furnish a title report for the property at the Developer's expense. 2. All newly created legal descriptions shall be furnished by the Developer and shall be stamped and signed by a professional land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. Each newly created legal description shall be accompanied by a drawing that graphically depicts the legal description. 3. The Developer has paid the required deposit as set forth in District Resolution No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto. Said deposit shall be applied against actual expenses of the District, including all bacteriological testing and sampling. The District shall determine, on a regular basis, its actual costs associated with the project, including taxes, and shall submit to the Developer an invoice to repay the District for actual costs in excess of the amount previously collected. Payment shall be due as noted on said invoice. Off -hours labor, including overhead, costs for such inspections will be charged to the project on an DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 1 of 8 overtime basis. The Developer agrees that the project account shall remain current for the life of the project and delinquency of any kind shall induce work stop action/orders, suspension/termination of service or any other action necessary to effect collection of monies owed the District. In the event monies are owed the District for work on, or unpaid charges allocated to, the project, as determined by the District, Developer agrees that the District shall be entitled to recover such monies by withholding and making application for payment to itself, any assignment of funds, cash deposits or latecomer reimbursements otherwise owing to the Developer. In the event that the deposit exceeds the District's actual expenses, the District shall issue to the Developer, at project closing, a refund of such unused amounts. 4. Except as noted herein, all work conducted by the District will be performed during normal work hours. The Developer may, at their discretion, submit a written request to the District for District non-exempt staff to expend overtime for tasks and services related to the completion of this Agreement. Said written request(s) shall state the Developer's reasons for the request(s) that would qualify it as an "emergency" (e.g., "excessive" additional expenses for any delays in plan review (actual/estimated figures should be provided), approaching unfavorable weather conditions for construction, permit expirations, etc.). Each written request submitted to the District for this purpose should also specify any component limitations the Developer desires (e.g., request for plan review/approval, request for construction inspections, etc.). 5. In the event work and construction described herein is not completed within five (5) years from the date of application for this Agreement, said application date being OCTOBER 5, 2018, the District can terminate the Agreement without notice, the Agreement shall then be void, and a new Developer Extension Agreement Application, along with applicable fee, will be required to re -commence and subsequently complete said work. 6. It is agreed by the parties that time is of the essence in all matters relating to the performance of this Agreement. 7. The Developer agrees that all requests for modification to District standards, specifications, policies or Resolution shall be submitted in writing to the District. Such requests shall be reviewed and the District will provide a written response to each submitted written request. 8. The District shall review final plans and specifications for water distribution system construction to be performed by the Developer under this Agreement. If preliminary plans are not deemed acceptable by the District, the Developer shall be obligated to revise the plans and specifications in accordance with design standards deemed acceptable by the District. In the event that more than three (3) items are found to remain deficient by the District on the third submittal of plans, subsequent review by District staff may be billed at a factor of 1.5 times the standard rate without further notice to the Developer. The Developer shall submit final plans for construction in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment), and on standard print media (24"x36" or 22"x34" size), prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. After the Developer has been notified in writing by the District that final plans and specifications have been approved, and all other necessary items have been addressed and resolved, the Developer and the Developer's contractor shall meet with the District's representatives for a preconstruction meeting before construction is commenced. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 2 of 8 9. The Developer agrees that it shall be responsible for providing to the District accurate and reliable information concerning the actual location of the facilities constructed. In furtherance of this obligation, the Developer shall procure from LPE ENGINEERING PLLC, or other licensed engineer or surveyor that the Developer has indicated will be consulting on the construction phase of the project, a written statement, which shall be submitted to the District prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, stating that accurate data will be collected during construction of the facilities to enable the engineer/surveyor to submit actual and reliable "as -built" locations to the District, based upon the information available to the engineer/surveyor during construction and also by field survey of the constructed facilities that are accessible at the ground surface. The Developer shall cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, a certificate of insurance for the engineer's/surveyor's Errors and Omissions policy. The Developer shall also cause such engineer/surveyor to submit to the District, prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, a certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the engineer's/surveyor's General Liability policy, naming the District as an additional insured as respects the obligations set forth in this section. The limits for Errors and Omissions and General Liability Insurance shall not be less than $1,000,000.00 for each claim; $1,000,000.00 aggregate. At the conclusion of construction and prior to and as a condition of acceptance, the engineer/surveyor shall deliver to the District its certification that it has made periodic field investigations and measurements during construction and that the "as -built" drawings submitted to the District, which drawings shall be provided in AutoCAD format (on disk or via email attachment) and on original or fixed -line photo mylar, are accurate and reliable. The District shall have the right to approve any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor during the project and the Developer agrees that the District may refuse any change in the consulting engineer or surveyor or may condition the same on resubmittal of the certification of location described above. No approval of any new engineer or surveyor shall be unreasonably withheld by the District. 10. The District will make application For the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY 'Right-of-way Construction Permit(s)'. The Developer acknowledges familiarity with the provisions of such Right-of-way Construction Permit(s) and agrees that it or its contractor's failure to comply with any of the provisions of the permit(s) shall entitle the District, in addition to the right to enforce any other remedy available to the CITY OF FEDERAL WAY as the permitting party, to immediately stop all construction activity on the right-of-way until the violation or violations have been eliminated and corrected to the satisfaction of the District and the District should not be held liable for any damages, either direct or indirect, for the delay and expense of such work stoppage. The Developer shall procure all other state, county and city licenses or permits. 11. The Developer agrees this Agreement shall create twenty -foot (20') wide [pipe(s) offset five -feet (5') from nearest margin] non-exclusive easement areas and right-of- way granted to the District for water distribution facilities and all appurtenances related thereto, as indicated on water facility construction plans approved by the District for the project, respectively, through, over and across the Developer's property. This easement shall be maintained in full force and effect unless superseded and replaced by another easement as determined acceptable by the District. 12. In the event an easement is required over realty other than realty described in Paragraphs No. 1 & No. 11 herein, such easement, in form acceptable to the District, together with title report or other sufficient proof of ownership of such realty, shall be delivered to the DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 3 of 8 District prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. The Developer shall be obligated to obtain a written release from any property owner across whose property construction is performed pursuant to the grant of an easement, sufficient to indicate that the site restoration on the easement is satisfactory and complete. 13. Prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting, the Developer shall deliver to the District a restoration performance bond in a sum to be determined by the District after receipt of any required Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and/or after the determination of off -site restoration requirements related to the work described herein, conditioned that the Developer will restore to the satisfaction of the District, and state, county, and city agencies as applicable, all work to be performed hereunder in public rights -of -way and the District's easements. Form and contents of bond shall be determined by the District. This requirement is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held accountable for any such restoration. Should any restoration work be determined necessary, Developer will be notified to complete the restoration work. If such work is not corrected within the specified time, the District will perform the work and issue an invoice to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid within thirty (30) days of issue date. 14. Construction shall be performed in accordance with the District's approved plans, standards and specifications and only under the supervision of a licensed contractor experienced in the installation of water distribution system facilities and the related work. 15. Two (2) sets of materials submittals shall be submitted to the District as one package, bound and indexed with a table of contents, for all equipment/material to be furnished for this project. Each submitted piece of equipment/material shall be fully defined by catalog number and reference made as to its applicable section of the District's standard specifications. Materials submittals shall be submitted prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. 16. By execution of this Agreement, the District does not guarantee water service will be provided to realty described herein. In the event that any of the District's facilities, such as storage tanks, wells, and water transmission mains become utilized beyond their design or approved capacity or become inoperable for any cause, the District reserves the right to refuse any connections which would use such facility until remedial action has been completed, and the District shall not be liable for any direct or consequential damages which occur to the Developer arising out of such the District's refusal to connect or time delay necessary to take remedial action. 17. The Developer and its agents agree to indemnify and hold the District harmless from any and all claims which may be assessed against the District as a result of the construction or maintenance of the work described in this Agreement prior to acceptance by the District. The Developer shall maintain in full force and effect during the construction period, the following insurance: Commercial General Liability Insurance with bodily injury and property damage limits of not less than: $1,000,000.00 Each Occurrence $2,000,000.00 General Aggregate $2,000,000.00 Products -Completed Operations Aggregate Limit DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 4 of 8 b. Business Auto Liability coverage for all owned, non -owned, and hired autos with bodily injury and property damage limits of not less than: $1,000,000.00 Each Accident A certificate of insurance and a copy of an endorsement to the Developer's Commercial General Liability Insurance policy, showing the District as additional insured as respects the work to be performed under this Agreement, shall be provided prior to scheduling the preconstruction meeting. Thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the District for cancellation or expiration of this insurance. 18. The Developer shall notify the District the date work and construction described in this Agreement will commence, and said notice shall be given not less than 72 hours (not including Saturday, Sunday, or national holidays) prior to such date. No water distribution system facility shall be covered prior to inspection by the District. After work is commenced, it shall vigorously, consistently, and in a first-class workmanlike manner be carried to completion. The Developer shall maintain at the construction area at all times during construction, a representative to whom District notices may be given regarding construction. Said representative shall be designated in writing by the Developer before start of work. The Developer may request inspections during construction upon two (2) days notice to the District. 19. Testing of water system facilities shall be performed as required by the District and only after satisfactory tests have been completed and witnessed by the District's designated agent, will the work be accepted. The Developer agrees that at such time as the District has performed inspection of the water distribution system facilities & system connections and has delivered itemized punch lists to the Developer and/or the Developer's contractor, that the project will be pursued to final completion, including the performance of all necessary site restoration. 20. Upon completion of construction, the Developer or the Developer's contractor shall deliver to the District a guarantee in the amount of ten percent (10%) of construction costs or $5,000.00, whichever is greater, that a reliable contractor will make and pay for repairs necessary within two (2) years from the date of acceptance of said construction, arising from faulty labor or material. Form of guarantee is to be approved by general counsel for the District. This requirement is waived for public authorities; however, Developer shall be held accountable for any such repairs. Should any defects be discovered within the specified 2-year time period, Developer will be notified and given ample time to correct same. If defects are not corrected within the specified time, Lakehaven will perform the work and issue an invoice to the Developer. Said invoice shall be paid within thirty (30) days of issue date. This paragraph shall be valid beyond the release of this Agreement and until the District closes out the associated project account. 21. Upon completion of construction, the Developer shall submit, for acceptance and approval of the District, Bills of Sale for water distribution system facilities, mains and appurtenances installed and constructed pursuant to this Agreement, in a form acceptable to the District, together with such other engineering records and project cost data as may be required by the District. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 5 of 8 22. As a condition of District acceptance of the project, the Developer shall submit to the District a non-refundable warranty inspection fee for water, as set forth in District Resolution No. 2017-1300, or any subsequent amendment thereto, to be held by the District and applied against actual expenses of the District incurred to complete warranty inspections following the two-year warranty period. 23. In the event new or modified District easements are required over Developer's property described herein, such easements, in form acceptable to the District, shall be delivered to the District as a condition of & prior to the activation of any new or modified service connections for the property. 24. In the event the Developer requests and the District provides water meters for the realty described herein, prior to the District's acceptance of work, the Developer agrees to be solely responsible for any loss or damage to such water meters or their installation, which occurs prior to said acceptance of work by the District. 25. Work and construction performed under this Agreement shall not be connected to the District's water distribution systems until all provisions and requirements of this Agreement and District Resolutions, on the part of the Developer, have been fully complied with. 26. The District and the Developer agree that in carrying out the terms of this contract, the Developer shall be acting as an independent contractor and in no respect shall Developer be deemed an agent or partner of the District. 27. The Developer shall not assign this contract without the written consent of the District. 28. The District shall provide water service following the District's acceptance of the water distribution facilities for operation and maintenance and upon payment of the connection charges as set forth and in accordance with District Resolution No. 2017-1300. Said connection charges shall consist of the Capital Facilities Charge (CFC), Service &/or Meter Installation Charge &/or Deposit, and any other such charges levied in accordance with said District Resolution No. 2017-1300 or amendments thereto or any other applicable District Resolution at time service is requested. 29. The parties agree that, if determined applicable by the District, the provision of latecomer reimbursements for system facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement will be handled by separate agreement to be executed between the parties within a reasonable time following acceptance of the facilities and establishment of the appropriate latecomer reimbursement area by the District's Board of Commissioners. Any applicable latecomer reimbursement period will be limited to 15 years, or longer, pursuant to the provisions of state law. 30. Partial waiver or waiver by acquiescence by the District of any provision or condition of this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other provision or condition of this Agreement. 31. This Agreement shall constitute an easement and servitude upon the property described herein and shall be binding upon the heirs, assigns and successors in interest to the DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 6 of 8 Developer. This Agreement shall constitute an equitable lien against property described herein and in the event of nonperformance by the Developer, as stated herein, the District may foreclose said lien in the manner authorized by law. 32. This writing constitutes the full and only agreement between the parties, there being no promises, agreements or understandings, written or oral, except as herein set forth, or as hereinafter may be amended in writing. 33. Upon execution of this Agreement, the parties agree in the event either of them is required to enforce any provision or provisions of this Agreement against the other, that the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to all other amounts to which it is otherwise entitled by this Agreement, to its actual attorney's fees and costs, including those incurred on appeal. DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 7 of 8 WITNESS our hands and seals. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Date: _ ._lLui4�'1 1 t i�i State of L L 4 County of wu LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT King County, Washington Dev lopment ngineering Manager Dated: 11 7/1 ? This record was acknowledged before me on jet'rlu '. 8 � cj ( te) by amm �lrr ?�C-z as ��� W��e,4 t L Name) (Type of Authority, Title) (Company !Name) Mary Lucule Wwing Notary Public State of Washlnom L Dp*umrd E*res 0311&12021 For recording in the State of Washington, the Notarial Seal must be fully legible and cannot intrude into document margins. Please affix seal in the space provided. DATED: (Signaturqjl Note Puillic Title My appointment expires! DE Agr-6318019.docx (Form Update 12/19/17) Page 8 of 8 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET FOR ROAD. TAX PARCEL NO.0421049167 r EXHIBIT "B" PROPERTY DEPICTION il76822000701 58220010 ��6822UU24U 682200: 849 'cn ro46 2511�29908 Flu 00080 x 009855 ry52 682 90{ 14 S 300TH S r !' H 0421049134 J45 $85 31, 7985100 50 30309 7985100160 v T 04901 30313 4 30232 850 001 0421049167 985000160 2405 261 N 905 620 05000210 1626 a iaa aaa 985f2 Feet 15 2615 0013 �7 50001 i0D 2500 — 36550001fi'0_ 302ND FL ^� 55500017CIn655003 4 85100090 —30205 ti 303 Lakehaven WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Lakehaven Water & Sewer District — Development Engineering Section 31623 — 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Email: DE@Lakehaven.org * Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, water service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ❑ Building Permit-SFR () ❑ Building Permit-MFR () ® Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision () ❑ Short Subdivision () ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Other (specify/describe) Tax Parcel Number(s): 0421049167 Site Address: 2405 S 30011 St Lakehaven GIS Grid: L-06 Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: 0 sf (existing to be demolished) New Bldg. Area Proposed: 60 000 sf WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION 1. ❑ Water service can be provided by service connection to an existing " diameter water main that is approximately feet from the site. 2. ❑h' Water service for the site will require an improvement to Lakehaven's water distribution system of: 0 a. 45 + - feet of 8" diameter water main to reach the site; and/or b. The construction of a water distribution system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive water system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ® d. Other (describe): Lakehaven Developer Extension f DE] Agregment required. 3. ® a. The existing water system Is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan. ❑ b. The existing water system is not in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Water System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The subject property is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of water service outside of Lakehaven's water service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. S. Water service is subject to: ® a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ® b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven; ® c. Other: DE Agreement f #2 above) t be accented by Lakehavenprior to any,m i or irrigation service onnection activation. Comments/special conditions: Protect existing water &Ior sewer mains during construction. The nearest fire hydrants will be located on the Property (number & location TBD by fire marshal). System hydraulic model results (FF #343a, copy attached) indicate that Lakehaven's standard maximum allowable liquid velocity of 10 ft/s in the existing (and proposed new onsite) water distribution system, at no less than 20 psi is exceeded at a fire flow rate above 1800 GPM. This flow figure depicts the theoretical performance of the water distribution system under high demand conditions. Fire flow rates greater than this may be accommodated through water distribution system improvements, contact Lakehaven for additional information. 578 Pressure Zone Est. Meter Elevation(s)-GIS: 496+/-, Est. Pressure Range at Meter(s) (psi): 32-41 I hereby certify that the above water system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR Signature: r Date: ' 0421049167 wtr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Page 1 of 2 7683400 220001 78838Q02Q0 57 29809 7 22007 0 2223 22 0190 'T888 001 • 4 2?000 29810 78822 A,2205 29818 83$00 29817 - 788 1 0? MT _ 2331 7 522000 �- 31300 04 M838002 5 1 29825 i8J3 0210 827 29E28 RM2200040 7882211 00 �0 380020 23829 2200 20 2512 t r 8 O:FR- 79834 822000 2983 �^ 83820 7683800219 29835 e88 y 29841 75838002 2349 22000 �8 2 02 00t 3800207 29844 29843 17 , 7V58 00070 -7TMBMS Do u 29847 75 3$00 13 29 49 788� 0240 8360021) _ 2310 r 922080 22 0 29925 _ 29855 29852 922 0280 7 30005 - 0 21049133 6'' Cr 2209 is $" Cr 42144918 2405 G 0421049134 ` +q Ex. 0421049091 Hydrant 30119 Q {+ Oyp) O 0421049204 a w 30050 eev 0421049153 Ex. Wtr Svcs 4. -O4g 39 #11203, 2" Domestic 1V49131 ?$ #35720, 2" Irrigation 04210492 2304 „-37865, 6" Fire 30121 0421 4921 1- 421049191 6' 8510 40 2104 130 303 4 5000 0 2! 30205 3020 210490 3030 0 04210491 2 210 9148 3030 1 30211. 1TR 042104 113 79851 0160 798 100 0031 ! 38550[ 0421049171 $f}22 30 13 0090 50001 0 m{ 3021 30 1 f; 21049 81 51000 0 30213 5 000251 30303 LJ 302 798 100180 39320 550001 RK 0421049170 30221 04 8023914 30234 04921 79351 01 1198 1000 a = -� M3 9 3?8 30550 30, -r u+'z rv-rs-r 3f�5500�1? - -- - _ - '' 3Q U421 49121 33S 220037 76838002 0 2519 2621 2"'034 7 83800 &24 1 2645� 2200 30 29828 OBSI800 90 2641 8 0320 29 32 7683800280 1 8 0310 2V5 470 0 4 25as 21318 00" 517 10 8 0 , C 50 Q 1 300 1 w 2" 71$0 2518 �'4�r 01" 0 8500 3012 261 798 002� 798�0 2619 3 8 3 85 M 0 5000 20 2522 44 i38480 200- 30 7 f 3 500007 500 290 204 252 3$550 11e4)1 5500027 2513 302 2 5500031 i9$484 0240 '° 30 1 2 55000320 3t35500 3040 12-2 30221 Z 30 8 500003 dA� 7 30239 E -- L.akehwen water and seuver Water Certificate of Availability -ict neither warrants nor guarantees parcel Od27O497G7 accuracy of any facility information 0 it10 211a ided Facility ?orations and conditions Pubject io f ie 0 verification. 2}5/2019 Feel 0421049167 wtr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Page 2 of 2 Lakehaven WATER & SEWER DISTRICT Hydraulic Model Fire Flow Estimate Request/Reporting Form Requested By: Federal Way Public Schools Dale: 7/20/18 Location to be Modeled: proposed Hydrants for Wildwood Elementry Lakebaven'/. Section Grid: L/6 Intersection: S 300t' St & 24" Ave S Add. Description: See attached map Pressure Zone: 578 Results By: Date: Model Run No.: John Bowman 7/26/18 Master Water System Model 2007.net FF #343a Condition Pressure (psi) Flow (gpm) Static 33 0 Fire Flow 20 1800 NOTES: Lakehaven's adopted level of service goals for fire flow rates are 1000 gpm within single family residential areas (including duplexes) and 2500 gpm for multi -family, commercial, industrial areas. Model results depict the theoretical performance of the water system under high demand conditions and are not guaranteed to represent actual system performance. A design professional should be consulted for site specific design purposes. The calculated fire flow capacity in the above table is based on a currently available residual system pressure of 20 psi at the location modeled. Fire flow capacities greater than 1800 gpm may be accommodated through water system improvements. 072618FF343a- WildWOOd(Form Update 1/6/17) cm llmg)BETE � -32P 19, tir caxcnlr cum a DRIVE --l=T101�1 ]"11:1111-ml NEW 5'=1 ------- io- 4L CURB mp) -r--1 WKEEL STCp 1-m BUG WA=j As w-encl ( AR--,J S.'L siv e- l4c�v') AM .HEWATICOESIGN C/) A 2% PAVING & LMLrrY PLAN C-300 A �`.. VY�J'ER & SEWER DISTRICT SEWER CERTIFICATE OF AVAILAR IT . Lakehaven Water & Sewer District — Development Engineering Section 31623 — 1st Ave S * PO Box 4249 * Federal Way, WA 98063-4249 Telephone: 253-945-1581 or 253-945-1580 * Email: DE@Lakehaven.org This certificate is intended to provide the applicant, land use agencies &/or public health departments with information necessary to evaluate development proposals. Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to delay, or deny, sewer service based upon capacity &/or supply limitations in Lakehaven's or Other Purveyor's system facilities. Proposed Land Use: ❑ Building Permit-SFR Q ❑ Building Permit-MFR () ® Building Permit -Other ❑ Subdivision () ❑ Short Subdivision () ❑ Binding Site Plan ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Other (specify/describe) Tax Parcel Number(s): 0421049167 Site Address: 2405 S 300th St Lakehaven GIs Grid: L-06 Ex. Bldg. Area to Remain: 0 sf (existing to be demolished) New Bldg. Area Proposed: 60,000 sf SEWER SYSTEM INFORMATION 1. ® Sewer service can be provided by service connection to an existing 8" diameter sewer manhole that is approximately 5-±L- feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed land use. 2. ❑ Sewer service for the site will require an improvement to Lakehaven's sanitary sewer system of: ❑ a. feet of " diameter sewer main or trunk to reach the site; and/or ❑ b. The construction of a sanitary sewer collection system on the site; and/or ❑ c. A major portion of Lakehaven's comprehensive wastewater system plan would need to be implemented and/or constructed; and/or ❑ d. Other (describe): 3. ® a. The existing sewer system is in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan. ❑ b. The existing sewer system is not in conformance with Lakehaven's Comprehensive Wastewater System Plan and an Amendment to this Plan will be required. This may cause a delay in issuance of land use approvals or permits. 4. ® a. The proposed site land use is within the corporate limits of Lakehaven Water & Sewer District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of sewer service outside of Lakehaven's sewer service area. ❑ b. Annexation or Boundary Review Board approval will be necessary to provide service. 5. Sewer service is subject to: 0 a. Payment of connection charges (to be determined by Lakehaven); ❑ b. Proof or reservation of easement(s) as required by Lakehaven; lH c. Other: Sewer service ❑ i n germits required ❑ne-to cliscannect existing, one to- re -connect new). Comments/special conditions: The site has one f11 existing sewer connection (5SCP 17381 location unknown. I hereby certify that the above sewer system information is true. This certification shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of signature. Name: BRIAN ASBURY Title: DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR Signature; Date: 0421049167 swr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Page 1 of 2 7883800200 7683 00220 8220001 220Q1 332201137 78838002 0 2223 57 29809 29810 2519 2621 r I2 _ 22006 'ei& 16 4 3800 8380TR- 29818 3800 29817 2932 �45 83800193 2331-"220003 i$ 2200 30 7583800290 7883800 1 129a25 758 0130 2982 21341 76 3800 04 29828 7882200040 29S 822002 s $2 29929 2512 00 0 T683800280 3 0 - 83800209 7 22000 0 20 f- R CO MS3 a_625 8380020 B3$00219 29835 086-5 0041-3 -6 7f:822 fl�'t0- 29841 0 03-250- 2349 220006 22003 0 7 838002115 421-250- 29843 2200 3 29902 - 18838002 7 e 22000 758 01) 2517 (38 0_ _ 29847 76 3800 13 29849 M 2990 29925 r 838 0217 2310 220008 788 ill 0 242 5000 80 758 800 3 29855 8 00090 12 8220 29D 2020 $`g OQ5 4 2318 r 2991 551 30005 86-5-9 r1J 171-32 A 79 5000 0 850001 0 04 49-1 RX �13 3000 220 9 cc r 850001 r 0 031© N 0421049134 22 12 A P r 00300 0421049091 ON 020 30119 0421049167 21117 8 00290 144-85 2405 79 00i 102 0421045204 2521 79 0022 30050 5000 0 110 0421049153 20 3 S 4 'tfi4913-1- 4210 ' 139 798 00210 1S 7 p c�304 04 11 0421049244 5 301 �'t . 30121 2349 20 S000 3 PVC 2H15 798, 002 42/045151 44-M 129 'B 8510 40 859 0230 3 30205 42104 130 2i0490 � 100 20 302 25 8 r3B5 0096 0 1 3020 2329 �3030 tg01 330BBU 3855 0D 15 5 0001 4 302 1 4210 148 794-81 2321 798 00160 ��--55 5500 1 CDNC 0019 i5 C4210491 1 2f0491 3 30224 7995 000 30316 0 3020 50a0Z 47 [ 38 5000 90 550000 30204 30219 550 0180 5 00025 2529 :-,-2.10 f�49 0303 21049 3023 61 798 0180 r 51000 30 37 30320 212 55000270�� 5500008 30212 550001 2513 5500031 491 5 0421049170 T99g4.$0 -117k_ 30239 30234 51000 0 30 f 22NQ 0421 49125 2104 216 5500Q 30332 30 50©0320 � 550000 C r 5 16 5100 40 550002 42104 122 30221 3022-8 042iO4 0 210491 1 3D3°� 302 4 -- 042 04914 2416 5 0 3f3550 0 0421 49129qp it3 104926 3 042 0.490 r 5100 30 3B55Q IIzD 2306 2B 0 67-E- [ M3 tDTE: Lakehaven Water and Sewer District neither warrants nor guarantees the accuracy of any facility information provided Facility locations and conditions are suhjecttofieldver8icatoon_ Sewer C ertiflcate of Avail ahility Parcel 0421049167 a taa MG Feei 2 5/2019 KCN 0421049167 swr.docx (Form Update 12/28/18) Page 2 of 2 4k CIT 10'::tSP Federal Way s E E— iV •ARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33325 8`h Avenue South JAB! 10 �g Federal Way, WA 98003 253-835-2607; Fax 253-835-2609 w w w.c i rv•otTedera I way.co m CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COIMUNITY DCVELOPMEW Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Checklist Directions Please fill out the checklist to indicate which strategies have been used to implement CPTED principles in your proposed project. Please check all strategies that are applicable to your project for each of the numbered guidelines. You may check more than one strategy for each guideline. Your responses will be evaluated by city staff, and will be integrated into the site plan and/or building permit review process. Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 1.0 Natural Surveillance 1.1 Blind Corners _ ❑Confi Avoid blind corners in pathways and parking lots. _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Me Pathways should be direct. All barriers along pathways should be permeable (see through) including landscaping, fencing etc. ■ El Consider the installation of mirrors to allow users to see ahead of them and around corners. e Other strategy used: n 1.2 Site and Building Layout _ LICar Allow natural observation from the street to the use, from the ❑Revise use to the street, and between uses _ ❑NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 1 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy a Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review n/ Orient the main entrance towards the street or both streets on For Non -Single corners. ■ Family Development Position habitable rooms with windows at the front of the dwelling. ■ Access to dwellings or other uses above commercial/ retail development should not be from the rear of the building. ■ ®I Offset windows, doorways and balconies to allow for natural observation while protecting privacy. ■ Locate main entrances/exits at the front of the site and in view of the street. ■ For Commercial/ Retail/ Industrial If employee entrances must be separated from the main and Community E� entrance, they should maximize opportunities for natural Facilities surveillance from the street. 1 L� In industrial developments, administration/offices should be located at the front of the building. ■ Avoid large expanses of parking. Where large expanses of For Surface parking are proposed, provide surveillance such as security Parking and cameras. ■ Parking Structures Access to elevators, stairwells and pedestrian pathways should be clearly visible from an adjacent parking area. ■ Oe Avoid hidden recesses. ■ Locate parking areas in locations that can be observed by adjoining uses. M Open spaces shall be clearly designated and situated at For Common/ locations that are easily observed by people. Parks, plazas, Open Space er common areas, and playgrounds should be placed in the front Areas of buildings. Shopping centers and other similar uses should face streets. 2 Other strategy used: PLAYGROUNDS LOCATED DIRECTLY OUTSIDE THE BACK OF THE BUILDINGS IN FULL VIEW AND COMPLETELY SECURED WITH CHAIN LINK FENCING. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 2 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review 1.3 Common/Open Space Areas and Public On -Site Open _ ❑Cor Space _ ❑Revise Provide natural surveillance for common open space areas. _ ❑NA Comments: Position active uses or habitable rooms with windows adjacent P"O' to main common/open space areas, e.g. playgrounds, swimming pools, etc., and public on -site open space. 0 Design and locate dumpster enclosures in a manner which screens refuse containers but avoids providing opportunities to hide. ■ Locate waiting areas and external entries to elevators/stairwells 90 close to areas of active uses to make them visible from the building entry. e W Locate seating in areas of active uses. e Other strategy used: 1.4 Entrances _ Provide entries that are clearly visible. Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Design entrances to allow users to see into them before entering. ■ Entrances should be clearly identified (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. (Applicable during Certif►cate of Occupancy I►rspeclion . Other strategy used: create a secure entry vestibule with controlled entry tr and direct supervision by administrative staff 1.5 Fencing _ ❑ 0III Fence design should maximize natural surveillance from the ❑_Revise street to the building and from the building to the street, and _ ❑NA minimize opportunities for intruders to hide. Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 3 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review 6 Applicable during Building Permit Review ❑ Front fences should be predominantly open in design, e.g. pickets or wrought iron, or low in height. e Design high solid front fences in a manner that incorporates ❑ open elements to allow visibility above the height of five feet. e If noise insulation is required, install double -glazing at the ❑ front of the building rather than solid fences higher than five feet. e Other strategy used: NO FENCING ALONG STREETS AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDINGS. CHAIN LINK USED 1.6 Landscaping Avoid landscaping which obstructs natural surveillance and allows intruders to hide. Trees with dense low growth foliage should be spaced or their crown should be raised to avoid a continuous barrier. ■ Use low groundcover, shrubs a minimum of 24 inches in height, or high -canopied trees (clean trimmed to a height of eight feet) around children's play areas, parking areas, and along pedestrian pathways. ■ Avoid vegetation that conceals the building entrance from the street. r Evaluation for Agency Use Only _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Other strategy used: ❑ 1.7 Exterior Lighting ❑Car Provide exterior lighting that enhances natural surveillance. _ []Revise (Refer to FWRC 19.115.050(7)(a) for specific lighting _ ❑NA requirements.) Comments: Prepare a lighting plan in accordance with Illuminating Engineering Society of America (IESA) Standards, which Me addresses project lighting in a comprehensive manner. Select a lighting approach that is consistent with local conditions and crime problems. ■ Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 4 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Performance Performance Standard Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Locate elevated light fixtures (poles, light standards, etc.) in a ®/ coordinated manner that provides the desired coverage. The useful ground coverage of an elevated light fixture is roughly twice its height. ■ For areas intended to be used at night, ensure that lighting supports visibility. Where lighting is placed at a lower height to support visibility for pedestrians, ensure that it is vandal - resistant. e Ensure inset or modulated spaces on a building facade, access/egress routes, and signage is well lit. e In areas used by pedestrians, ensure that lighting shines on pedestrian pathways and possible entrapment spaces. e Place lighting to take into account vegetation, in its current and ❑ mature form, as well as any other element that may have the potential for blocking light. e Avoid lighting of areas not intended for nighttime use to avoid giving a false impression of use or safety. If danger spots are usually vacant at night, avoid lighting them and close them off to pedestrians. e eSelect and light "safe routes" so that these become the focus of legitimate pedestrian activity after dark. ■ ❑ Avoid climbing opportunities by locating light standards and electrical equipment away from walls or low buildings. e Use photoelectric rather than time switches for exterior lighting. e In projects that will be used primarily by older people ❑ (retirement homes, congregate care facilities, senior and/ or community centers, etc.) provide higher levels of brightness in public/common areas. e U 1.8 Other strategy used: Mix of Uses In mixed use buildings increase opportunities for natural surveillance, while protecting privacy. Evaluation for Agency Use Only _ ❑C'nr _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 5 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Where allowed by city code, locate shops and businesses on lower floors and residences on upper floors. In this way, NA ❑ residents can observe the businesses after hours while the residences can be observed by the businesses during business hours. ■ NA ❑ Include food kiosks, restaurants, etc. within parks and parking structures. M Other strategy: used_ _ 1.9 Security Bars, Shutters, and Doors _ ❑Conf When used and permitted by building and fire codes, security _ ❑Revise bars, shutters, and doors should allow observation of the street _ DNA and be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Comments: ❑ Security bars and security doors should be visually permeable (see -through). e Other strategy used: Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Section 2.0 Access Control 2.1 Building Identification _ 1JConf Ensure buildings are clearly identified by street number to ❑Revise prevent unintended access and to assist persons trying to find _ DNA the building. Identification signs must conform to FWRC Comments: 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ❑ Street numbers should be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. e Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 6 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy N Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review In residential uses, each individual unit should be clearly numbered. In multiple building complexes, each building entry ❑ should clearly state the unit numbers accessed from than entry. In addition, unit numbers should be provided on each level or floor. e ❑ Street numbers should be made of durable materials, preferably reflective or luminous, and unobstructed (e.g. by foliage). e For larger projects, provide location maps (fixed plaque ❑ format) and directional signage at public entry points and along internal public routes of travel. e Other strategy used: 2.2 Entrances _ ❑Cor Avoid confusion in locating building entrances. _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Entrances should be easily recognizable through design le features and directional signage. (Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. Exempt Signs. ■ Minimize the number of entry points. 0 Other strategy used: 2.3 Landscaping _Conforms Use vegetation as barriers to deter unauthorized access. El —Revise _ ❑NA Comments: ❑ Consider using thorny plants as an effective barrier. e Other strategy used: 2.4 Landscaping Location _ ❑Cnzif Avoid placement of vegetation that would enable access to a _ ❑Revise building or to neighboring buildings. _ ❑NA Comments: Bulletin #022 — January 1, 2011 Page 7 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Avoid placement of large trees, garages, utility structures, Rr fences, and gutters next to second story windows or balconies that could provide a means of access. ■ Other strategy used: 2.5 Security _ ❑Confi Reduce opportunities for unauthorized access Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Consider the use of security hardware and/or human measures He to reduce opportunities for unauthorized access. (Applicable during Certificate of Occupancy Inspection). Other strategy used: 2.6 Signage _ ❑Confi Insure that signage is clearly visible, easy to read and simple _ ❑Revise to understand [Signs must conform to FWRC 19.140.060. _ ❑NA Exempt Signs]. Comments: ❑ Use strong colors, standard symbols, and simple graphics for informational signs. e Upon entering the parking area, provide both pedestrians and For Surface ❑ drivers with a clear understanding of the direction to stairs, Parking and elevators, and exits. e Parking Structures In multi -level parking areas, use creative signage to distinguish between floors to enable users to easily locate their cars. e ❑ Advise users of security measures that are in place and where to find them, i.e. security phone or intercom system. e ❑ Provide signage in the parking area advising users to lock their cars. e Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 8 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist Section and ✓ Functional Area Evaluation for Performance Performance Standard Agency Use Only Standard Strategy ■ Applicable during Site Plan Review e Applicable during Building Permit Review Where exits are closed after hours, ensure this information is indicated at the parking area entrance. e Other strategy used: El Section 3.0 Ownership 3.1 Maintenance ❑Confi Create a "cared for" image _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Ensure that landscaping is well maintained, as per FWRC C'f 19.125.090, in order to give an impression of ownership, care, and security. (Ongoing). Where possible, design multi -unit residential uses such that no NA ❑ more than six to eight units share a common building entrance. ■ Other strategy used: 13 3.2 Materials _ ❑Conf Use materials, which reduce the opportunity for vandalism. _ ❑Revise _ ❑NA Comments: Consider using strong, wear resistant laminate, impervious glazed ceramics, treated masonry products, stainless steel ❑ materials, anti -graffiti paints, and clear over sprays to reduce opportunities for vandalism. Avoid flat or porous finishes in areas where graffiti is likely to be a problem. e ❑ Where large walls are unavoidable, refer to FWRC 19.125.040(21) regarding the use of vegetative screens. e Common area and/or street furniture shall be made of long ❑ wearing vandal resistant materials and secured by sturdy anchor points, or removed after hours. e Other strategy used: Bulletin #022 —January 1, 2011 Page 9 of 9 k:\Handouts\CPTED Checklist mom — r : `• J r ZMET 1 r r gas � - 5�oa� f9�. � •� r: - IA 42 �i %cam < •i � � �� � � � � — � � ! / � 1� 1 7 � � 7�.�i '� �y 3 ti 20 4 SC le 1 "-40' t t �.• oo�b000000 `� 1 1� 1 {11.111'4� ,�•cm r t .. SS .� � - • - .. � . -_- �+ .. �. --. ---iP .� + 1 � I ` I � I / I ! I I I I � � l } SS 3 � � � t :Vi�• •� •� - _• •. ~ I• - - '•{ � a a � � Q Q o � � � } / I/ .// I IfIJI l D S ate' - r r , rrr rf sir frJ I� ; r rr • f�,ri r�r r r fir {fr frrrr � rrf , r r - - / / f � _. - 'j�•• f � l� i n �. fr rrr, r ( f �ITTED J l fir.! h it EAU U 2019 I I f r'i7Y dh WAY FF 49&0 - ==-- - - FEDERAL A- -PUBLIC SCHOOLS - -- ©2018 LPD Engineering PLLC 193ZFrstAve, Description August 21, 2019 Figure WILDWOOD , Suite201, LARGE BUS (S—BUS-40') = 7 a..2 �7251211 SCHOOL BUS TURNING EXHIBIT SMALL BUS (28') = 4 f.ii76.973.5344 �/�/ILDWOOD ELEM SCHOOL I A engineering pIIC www.lpdengineering.com AF �i►��- e��GiMIR •�,� � �; -=ice • ! � � ' � � � ~� � � — 1 � ~ ~� � � � i � ti I f � 1 ; � ] 1 l I l � , � } � I �� �- -� it / �-- _ =�_��= � - - _ -` `� ;�,� _ - �� ',l1{�1[ 1 1 t � � `•1.� � �, I r 1 96 J 11 l \ I � � '. -... � _ _�_ ._ _� .--- - 1 � � +I ..ice d c do � � � o a d o � � � II } � � 1 �}`�+•��`+IjI l}� � i � ! � // ❑ � ❑ Q Q ❑ ' � 11 � �, b � o d�� d ��• � � � 11 1 i } �� ��il �jl�l{II�I � �.�� ss,�. \ ' VI .. f .. •• .. •,- - - � •4 � � � � d c-� a o ss- Jf�! 3\ \ I _ .:�-••.. Gg DS •r •p l•- "-�• �G - — —_ I I - - - - --- , r � � • � 1 ITTED n l iiF1<. •�rrir f r. F .. �} > l y r i / A ,2 2019 ,�•- �J 1 r 11 :V ::: =ti . 1 1 I, �r l , l CiiY EM WAY Aq -- --- - - T-- - - - FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL-DIST-RICT•- - ©2018 LPD Engineering PLLC 1932First Ave, Description August 21, 2019 Figure Suite 201, WILDWLARGE BUS p.20Sead?,325. 91101 SCHOOL BUS TURNING EXHIBIT LARGE BUS (S—BUS-40) = 7 p.2fi6.725.1211 SMALL BUS (28') = 4 F.206.973.5344 WI LDWOOD ELEM SCHOOL I B engineering pllc www.lpdengineedng.com � + Y i liNiiia �� + • + --- 1, JJ ew <-2a f� _ _ l f 1 _ wn-1 � . - �; :.." / � � • _. — — � - I ... , % , _ • \\ �� 'tom, '�-�'�- 7�" � / _ 000�0000000 - ' IS �llll,�'`lljlll tllp + l S le f / I I o 0 jj w r l ll } I I Ij III I}II \� . I � 1, � / . , tip: • i, . � � � �, h � � � i`�•�'��I I I 1 � I I � r I �. — -- �— 1 III ' SS fl SS__ l i r r i III 1 I \ .-. • ��• .. .�.••- •�•. l � � � d o a o 0 0 o d � � � � Lr itJ1 ���f IJ'' r �j\ 1 I I r =� ; :.r frffrr —,,,, os a r W — _ ry _-i :1 / lll�I'llllrll 11l • ' � • �.. .•� •, I � , � fff ff r it ' ff f � ) ) �.,�-fj'I,1� 1 � -� 4 1 L % fffff%rf/ff f % f ��'•. / / / � I•- - � � � � { �' rff .ter/ff ffrf ff frffff�-f � 1 1 1 i !' � Iz,.xr I�(1' fi•� \, \ 1 '� i l l l \ ,� / / l /rlfrJ.' `r• f fff f i•F � i / �. i. �� � . � ���U • � ��aa � 1 �Ii � / I1`1{ 1 L 1 f i J jai: flrl 1 l r - 1Mll I CLr FF 490.E \\ / •.`�• ' 'r•:.� r .'t , 7 r 1 J 1 0 20 j f 1 I f �irrffiff I rrr .' 'T tf ,=�w r • .•;` ��`ti,2RAL WAY .,� 1 1 {: \ L . ��II�L ©2018 LPD Engineering PLLC FEDERAL WA-r-SCHO-OVDISTRIC1 1932F7tstAve, Description August 21, 2019 Figure Suite 201, p.20 Seattle, WA981i]1 TRASH TRUCK TURNING EXHIBIT a. zo6.zz�.1z11 L206.973.530 WILDWOOD ELEM SCHOOL 3 engineering pIIC www.lpdengineedng.com cg)2018 LPD Engineering PLLC 10+00 11+00 1932 Ffrst Ave, Suite SeaStfe, WA 481171 p. 206.725.1211 IN Up f. 206.973.5344 gineering pIIC w,,.lpdengineedng.cDm Description 12+00 RESUBMITTED AUG 2 6 2019 CITY OF FEDERAL WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FEDERAL WAY SCHOOL DISTRICT August 21, 2019 1 Figure BUS VT CLEARANCE EXHIBIT WILDWOOD ELEM SCHOOL Nt 00 Lxj C> V- trrN't f ) al 1! ti! f t t 5 i o f i I 4 a Y d 4X� j P i Y Y, p f J i j 4j W t r � y s x µ .w,. •.r., '" .."x^ukyi� .w ......: s».... ,.»,.x. ,nr•w ;. ' i y 1 � { *m"`wN , �' M1w14. V ,.. 1 f .,. }Aa;, � oM+ax,u"^�r nm�.... .,F«, 4., ,,eµr ' a, ., �& °<•�'x r. Y' rvF+w» �" � 'atxgA+wa4�Hrtw a rxmxr wewp „ .� .ou d•MxnMM w w:.v ea, i„ ttv. �`�Mp� rywn r x w y 1 � .w. niex +nkvaA rtv',yypeup � y } �•% i1y t2 'vr , y � 1 t. e� t cc'-- 01 . oo cj co L W � a i-- C'V W X =mow) LL ML ,, �, r­ W N f1 • rMR wM � r � .xY ± 3 lu rNuil r s t a k r f ax j i It wiw�.a t 4 a� � br- 4 tt r { y. 7111, t� 't Morr�N�lll 1 t' 1 ,?aElxta fi J 3Y ,1 4 a h, 2 Y� 1 t t 777 mate. 4/1 /21 Job Flo.. 2173_ u raven By, C R L Checked by._ _ _ _ BP Revisions # Date Description z 4/15/2019 C IIU 03 A-Z /21LU/ /201RE ER IT UB IT A,L #1 PAVIN%li IN X P E 1p"N"M I T XX-XXXXXX-A"IIA UVE M W,v ry } Pj ,' i �Y/Ott '1 t f�! !Illhli ly;, Z2\\ J i AMn O FYPt,..Ann /p 7 - � AA =7 777 f"N . ... . .... A ", l< 4t. A 476— T i IlZi - It aq tN L. Lit" 4 A —"ACCESSIBLE LOADING I (zir_m ATT,&rppn TO Lj L_ I t— %..# I VA 1-11 L_ t— %a %a I %I I 13.I L.- SEE LA PLANS 4 Ll ...... _. .... . '1 4' 1 J,sd, IV, 0 4 '6, FLUSH CONCRETE b, m 5 il", 4 �,'I, 0 CURB (91 LF) C 7 =717 �77 Ile f "ACCESSIBLE LOADING r5 t'l SIGN ATTACHED TO C-40 8 BOLLARD CROSSWALK STRIPING I- -406 4080M 1000111.WPM l, 40 Gomm 4009 40 almom ==a m amm ME= 40 mow amm 40 =ism amlio 40 cumm amm mmm 40 A C"mm=403 & I N tN L. Lit" 4 A —"ACCESSIBLE LOADING I (zir_m ATT,&rppn TO Lj L_ I t— %..# I VA 1-11 L_ t— %a %a I %I I 13.I L.- SEE LA PLANS 4 Ll ...... _. .... . '1 4' 1 J,sd, IV, 0 4 '6, FLUSH CONCRETE b, m 5 il", 4 �,'I, 0 CURB (91 LF) C 7 =717 �77 Ile f "ACCESSIBLE LOADING r5 t'l SIGN ATTACHED TO C-40 8 BOLLARD CROSSWALK STRIPING I- -406 4080M 1000111.WPM l, 40 Gomm 4009 40 almom ==a m amm ME= 40 mow amm 40 =ism amlio 40 cumm amm mmm 40 A C"mm=403 & I N \l PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING mill 1 111011 111111momom", 4 4 Ja CONCRETE PAVEMENT vo 0 0 0 Od 0 0 0<0 44 1Y CONCRETE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT tzk 1"a, HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT 4A o", a_ 4 (AC) GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER "t, PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER ahr ;1�,r. QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE 9. kyi'l 1rl FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN Y DETENTION FACILITY STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS WATER SERVICE LINES , j -wd* - - - - - - - - - - WATER METER CIO ry WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION 'tt 00 o 00 rn ce) 00 C,4 W LIJ C> C'4 W U- Lu (y) 00 wN Lu to uj ­� (0 c) W 04 z W Z 0 m Z) CL 0 U) LLJ _j r— LLI 771111- 7� III Date: 04/15/2019 Job No..- 21739 Drawn By: CRL CheGked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 AN 'm r...,d in Alm NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILI BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. A, i J k �A I AHBL #100 i I Tj; '� Ir � , -3 , �-�, ' � � NAIL AND WASHER /* )I N: 125029.5475 e , E -1276579.6688 '9 F EV: 482.61 A .. ........ -TT A co� CROSSWALK b, 4 —40 STRIPING 5 "BUS LOADING 0 N LY r-------- I C-406DURING SCHOOL HOURS" SIGN k ... ....... CONCRETE J A N, 3 ay WHEEL ST OP C ) PAW- "0 *Mir PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 — PROPOSED CONTOUR V-0-78.00" FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING 1/ 1" mlmm�j PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT v, 4 *1 0 `12 'a 0 0 0 0q0 59 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT 0, 0 0 A 0 0 0" 4a, a 6-1-0111-a".1.4_04 111 (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING 17, SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER TI E R P —SETTLING BASIN SAND FILTER PMRIVI QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN i 6 DETENTION FACILITY STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT 2 STD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT (TYP) C-405 THERMOPLASTIC rY TRAFFIC ARROW C-407 (TYP) CONCRETE WALKWAY TYPC-40� () 71, 4' HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT . ..... PAVEMENT (I _YP) —40 k one WHITE PAINT 1-4 51 STRIPING (TYP) 4 0 1 C-402 /� k m 4i" 4�m amm m mime SEEM W% mmm�l amm;j m am= =mm m ME= mmm ft mm C-403 g, C-404 yrp M, m Aft& OV V AYVVIV La M I T ugm-% E K•- AA—XxxAz xz %,"Xx LLJ .4t 00 C> cy) V_ Cttrs 0o (y) Q") LLJ tjj _j 04 D< LLJ C�o U. C) LIJ C07 'IL V- AV I CY) 00 _C14 UJI 4L 11qL is Lu W co z Lu Z 0 D CL 0 uj _j Lu • O iAU .......... Date-, 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019; ADDENDUM 03 ZI 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 a NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL (CO) BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMIATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, MAA TCMmILIN S Sm"'Et=T Cmm=401'1 M PFF x s k 493.0 M � � r' �,.; ,' :✓',� "°�,;+"r {✓' '„ �',r° r r ,,`" ' ,r'' ,v''��,r`" ,r ° r^'� '` ,r° r�r" ,✓ r". „."''+' .. /* ' r r. ..,, ,x;,., +. «x. ..,µ, J` ° <:° ,r+'» r? r�` .?r rr ,," r ,✓ ar .a` ;''` r,„. J" .'' ,J ;,F' +" �+' .n rr e° e ✓ ;e rr' s,.. � �s .r•' � r, r a r r c r a� *" «y t � . ,° ,a .� � . �. � . a a rx:;.,' ., �, , ,� , , " ✓' r f" ,�• r,r ,�"'' .r" ,�� „�' r � re,.. .', r,sn „a ii v, 1 z, 15 p U. µw-«w,t�.,,,,,. a 1rs „Csfi q,, Jr a✓ .'ryn+.n++ �. n,.�, .,.,r,,�,u» .,,.x. .�.»., ,. ,.,, ..; ; ,;r , ,....,-,.,..»-..,... ...,,„�., £,`� .. ts) ,t. ,, ,,,,:rµ J;r • {p , � 2 v� raa ,.e;.. ��,� MY;, ��py�yyyy� i. xr. ,,..�: »>:..;.n,.»r w. .. „»fµ: ..r.», jr+n:.t t .:�,.;+ f ,ti', v i,aj.r' �S.l C1 ,... ,w..,i.: ,x.,,?.,...,.. .,,..r » ..; "" .,Vyv. ,«. '' ,�•„'" .J"' z r„ 3 t .4 ,-�+ 7A ,„, . bF4 p • h,.,„,..«.», p ,,...,,.,, , , ,,, .., ,. xi r, , ,+ a., z .s ;�.' p d b a O !d / p n p b,. � °J �s{0...,. p b p ` `�' } + is 1r t n a � P, @ t,k , p +� [� A IN s p a ry m a c3 p j i. xnw ^ t � M!�kldF tiM10. LM sMd°JJt4,',wt Mk t 1 ib� J' E �100 frZ 1 t 01 NO, r " YELLOW SKIP STRIPING (TYP) co ASPHALT PAVEMENT (TYP) C4O » °. PROPERTY LINE mx�R EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR O OUR PROPOSED (� SED CONTOUR INDEX _. 231 PROPOSED OSED CONTOUR FF 78.V FINISHED S ED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING >t r f A r PROPOSED P I LD BUI N KI Q q � CONCRETE P EETE PAVEMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `f`0� q @'? 4 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT . _ '77 GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB Nwrv*n1+Rtwuw:'+rrwrvYamr »N+wn �Wrnp CURB AND GUTTER i t Yi ! PRE -SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN at CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 FOOTINGDRAIN CLEANOUT DOWN POC T SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSM7 I3CI I AI « L HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS i i a WATER SERVICE LINES o f z� WATER METER x `— WATER SERVICE LINES Y f y FIRE SERVICE LINE i yy a° FIRE SERVICE VAULT -1 I FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION ft jr Nvlf %lXXx4m E f-,` I T 1`42 UA uAA%z"XXAA Xx I APPROVED - I cc t— C� CID C14 to U.1 w to Lu Ct C:> u_ ce) �0 00 W Lu W 04 _j ¢w M z a DCL 0 W W i • i i �t S, , r 7j f .3 Date: 04/1 /201 Job No.: 2173 Drawn : CRL Checked : SBP Revisions # Date Description /1 � 4 �/2� 19 ADDENDUM 03 I'' ZL 6/21 2�19 LU/PERMIT RBUBMIT'TAL #1 NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. / 4mmm I/ 0 SEE MECH PLANS FOR EQUIP PADS (TYP) .I r Y* fa� ads y: 411 --- — ------ 4� 492---- 493--- 111�'.'�, JT" 7' 7`77 rt STAIRWAY . ..... ..... ........ SEE LA . .. . PLANS j 50 xr r. ASPHALT 'N" k u. 40WALKWAY V I L) 40 4mmm ago", 40 40mm 0 J T IN. ............ z`/ ROLLED CONCRETE 8 CURB (28 LF) C��o H EAVY DUTY CONCRETE (TYP) dEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT (TYP) CHAIN LINK FENCE 4,� BY OTHERS (TYP) PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) MATCMOLIN 231� CONTOUR PROPOSED E THIS SH ET FF 78.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 40 EX BUILDING 40 4m1mm Mom PROPOSED BUILDING 4 4, CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT x,wt(AC) 4t_*, �v 0, 4 0 0,01 0 HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT ... ......... ----------- . ....... . GRAVEL SURFACING JI SITE WALL .. .. ....... ........... VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER 7, PRE —SETTLING BASIN SAND FILTER k, 4 QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD 1 0 AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 . . ... ... CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE -------------- -------- FOOTING/SUBSURFACE E DRAIN 10 DrT[NTION FACILITY 4 o A STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS ........ ... SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH ..... . . ....... ............... - Ix OLI-ARD u. FIR[ 1, -]YDRANT WA"F[R F11"'rINGS t WATER SERVICE LINES "jL',i _",m* ---------- b WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE 'I FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION aCa wto C> W x C) U- W C01) ce) vJ I 00 W (0 Lu F_ Cf) C14 z W z 0 T F_ Z) CL 0 CD W _j W Mi wr rM r. rY 77 1 77; v�, Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked byf SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 ZL 6/21/2019, LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 ............. 6/2112019 SAW —CUT, TACK COAT AND MATCH EX ASPHALT GRADE FINISHED GRADE 12 EXISTING ASPHALT GRADE XI FINISHED G Ae" I r. d EX UNDISTURBED PAVEMENT SUB —BASE MUST BE COMPACTED TO 95% MAX. DENSITY PER ASTM Dl 557 L 4 HMA CLASS 1/2" ASPHALT PREPARE CONCRETE PAVEMENT SUBGRADE 6 )) CRUSHED SURFACING BASE PER GEOTECH COURSE PER WSDOT SECTION REPORT 9-03.9(3), COMPACT TO 95% MAX DENSITY PER ASTM D1557 PREPARE SUBGF PER GEOTECH 12" GRAVEL BORROW PER WSDOT REPORT SECTION 9-03.14(l), COkIPACT TO 95% MAX DENSITY OR EX SUBGRADE MOISTURE CONDITIONED COMPACTED TO 95% MAX DENSITY PER ASTM D1557 SIDEWALK (-'I A kaWIDTH ur) IMUN COAT D MATCH EX PHALT GRADE ISTING ASPHALT SEE NOTE 5 DIRECTION OF 10) (APPROX) BROOM FINISH (nP) CONTRACTION JOINT CENTER BETWEEN EXPANSION JOINTS SEE NOTE 5 3/8" FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT IN-",,X BOTH CURB AND SIDEWALK. 10' SPACING TYPICAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE NOTE 5 UNDISTURBED CEMENT SUB -BASE ST BE COMPACTED _..�FINISHED GRADE 95% MAX. DENSITY R ASTM D1557 7 1,� r. HMA CLASS 1/2" ASPHALT CONCRETE (EMENT CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE R WSDOT SECTION 9-03.9(3), PREPAREL MPACT TO 95% MAX DENS 7� ? E-IF SUBGRADE 4" CEMENT CONCRETE, CL 3000 FM D1557 PER GEOTECH I z k.7r\MVLL DVr\r\U" r-C-r\ ",DUU1 REPORT 4 UKVZ:)rlt_U SURFACING BASE SECTION 9-03.14(1), COMPACT TO 95% COURSE COMPACT TO 95% MAX MAX DENSITY OR EX SUBGRADE MOISTURE DENSITY PER ASTM Dl 557 CONDITIONED COMPACTED TO 95% MAX DENSITY PER ASTM Dl 557 .1 4 1 MIN. .E /8 -,y4 4 4 4 Dnl VHDE"TUAKIC NOT - E51 0 A JOINT SEALANT 4 X, _11'.-I 1. IF EX PAVFMFNT SFCTION IS *rlIICKFR, MA`1`0­1 FX SFC­fl0N. OT1,1EIRWISE, CONSTRUCT 1. IF EX PAVEMENT SECTION IS THICKER, MATCH EX SECTION. OTHERWISE CONSTRUCT FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINT DETAIL CONTRACTION JOINT DETAIL SECTION SHOWN. SECTION SHOWN. 2. SAW CUT FULL DEPTH WHERE NEW PAVEMENT ABUTS EXISTING AND APPLY TACK COAT. 2. SAC UT FULL DEPTH WHERE NEW PAVEMENT ABUTS EXISTING AND APPLY TACK COAT. NO 3. PLACE ASPHALT IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT APWA SECTION 5-04. 3. PLACE AC IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT APWA SECTION 5-04. 1. CONCRETE SHALL BE AIR ENTRAINED CLASS 3000 PER SECTION 6-02 OF WSDOT STANDARD 4. PROOF ROLL AND REMOVE ANY SOFT SPOTS, RFPLACE REMOVED MATERIAL WITH 4. PROOF ROLL AND REMOVE ANY SOFT SPOTS. REPLACE REMOVED MATERIAL WITH SPECIFICATIONS. GRAVEL BORROW. CONTRACTOR SHAI.[.,,,,, 41Sl AND VERIFY SUBGRADE MEETS COMPACTION GRAVEL BORROW, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND VERIFY SUBGRADE MEETS 2. FINISH- LIGHT FINISH WITH A STIFF BROOM PERPENDICULAR TO CURB, FOR GRADES OVER 4% REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PAVING. COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PAVING. FINISH* WITH A STIPPLE BRUSH. 6 #1 5-1/2 EX OR PROPOSED PAVEMENT SEE PLAN 3. REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT OF CEMENT CONCRETE CURB SHALL BE I`f�OM EXPANSION JOINT TO EXPANSION JOINT UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 4. LIDS FOR JUNCTION BOXES AND UTILITY VAULTS SHALL BE NON-SKID. 5. JOINT LAYOUT WILL BE PER PLAN. NTS NTS STD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONS LRETE WALKWAY 1 $) R 1/2 "R SLOPE VARIES SURFACING PER PLAN 6" EXCEPT WHERE nTUC"E)lAll0C" KInTrl'A -j < CAST -IN --PLACE CONCRETE V-6fp \\-4" MIN. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE COMPACT TO 95% MAX DENSITY ASTM D1557 5-1/2 rSLOPE VARIES NTS RETE V`ER`Tl(,0,ftAL CURB' 95% MAX DENSITY ASTM D1557 PREPARE SUBGRADE PER GEOTECH REPORT #4 REBAR @ 24" O.C. EACH WAY. PLACE REBAR IN UPPER ONE-HALF OF SLAB WITH AT LEAST 2 INCHES OF CONCRETE COVER. 6" CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE PER WSDOT SECTION 9-03.9(3) COMPACT TO 95% MAX DENSITY PER ASTM D1557 DOTE: 1. PLACE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT MAX 12' O.C. IN BOTH DIRECTION ON SLAB. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE MADE BY SAW —CUT OR TOOLED INTO CONCRETE DURING PLACEMENT 2. FINISH: LIGHT FINISH WITH A STIFF BROOM PERPENDICULAR TO CURB. FOR GRADES OVER 4% FINISH WITH A STIPPLE BRUSH. 3. LIDS FOR JUNCTION BOXES AND UTILITY VAULTS SHALL BE NON—SKID. 4. JOINT LAYOUT WILL BE PER PLAN. OPE VARIES 3P-61) NTS F L lul S k mum Rm B Y))R �2 SIDEWALK OR SURFACING PER PLAN 1, MIN NTS 2 $-of$ 1 P-91) 0 z 0 L 0 Cn Uj Cn PI cr- :D ELEV PER PLAN 2 ))$R "R /2 /2 VARIES 611 TO 7 Y2 40 6 MATCH PAVEMENT SLOPE AND GRADE PERMIT NO. XX-XXXXXX-XX LWcri act' tX'3 ra cc Uj z 0 X CL U) Uj LU • 4ip! I sm A1016 • li 7 V 77 Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By.- C R IL Checked by; SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21 /2019, LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1,: PAVING DETAILS NTS APPROVED ROLLED CONCRETE CURB DATEC-405 LAND USEIPERMIT SUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL #1 `���-_�_t z ^1,,% 1 /Z,011h % U1A 9 0 00 Lu CY) w 0') ce) 00 RADIUS POINT OF CURB RETURN #4 REBAR @ 241, O.C. 0. C. EAC H WAY CURB, OR CURB HEAVY CONCRETE 3 ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND GUTTER PAVEMENT All, 4 4 CEMENT CONCRETE 4 4 4 12 PEDESTRIAN CURB 4 4 4 4 4 .0 4 A 6)-7)) 6)-7)) 4 2 LAYERS 4" WHITE PAINT STRIPE 31-2))IM.- _4 3 z 0 => V) 4 % A RAMP < 5 N/X 0 2'-5 2 .447 e%. I X V) CJ /V4 M 0 8 MIN 8 IN 3)-2" 45 8)-3)) 8)-3)1 3 LO E DETECTABLE WARNING - I 'I','' I'll "I'll 1 B C 4 . ...... 4' SURFACE (SEE DETAIL) 1' 2-1/2 ASPIHAL I NCRETE TRANSMOw"AN 5' MIN 4' MIN C)) C)) 15' MAX 4)) (SEE NOTE 2) I F- 3-1/2 DETAIL A LEFT DETAIL B RIGHT EXPANSION JOINT DETECTABLE WARNING SAME DIMENSION RAM P AS DETAIL D SURFACE (SEE DETAIL) 91 LANDSCAPE SECTION FLUSH CEMENT CONRET SEE ARROWHEAD 2 WITH AC EDGE SIDEWALK NOTE 2 TOP OF' 00 2% MAX.lj____ ROADWAY A PAVEMENT WIDTH PER PLAN V -450 TAMPED AND CHAMFER EDGE SAME DIMENSION 4 4 AS DETAIL A UA DEPRESSED ARROWHEAD CURB & GUTTER 'I J 10 10 9',­­ 4 v T'll 11 NOTES.- 6'— 6 TWO LAYERS 1 4 8 LANDSCAPE SECTION SEE LA 4 1. DO NOT PLACE GRATINGS, JUNCTION WHITE PAINT 17 (AT GRADE BREAK, SUBGRADE COMPACTED BOXES, ACCESS COVERS OR OTHER TOP OF RAMP TO FIRM AND UNYIELDING HMA ASPHALT CONCRETE APPURTENANCES IN FRONT OF THE RAMP rr CONDITION PAVEMENT PER PLAN OR ON ANY PART OF THE CURB RAMP 4 )_0)$ UD OR LANDING. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE STRAIGHT I)ETAIL D STRAIGHTZ COURSE PER PLAN PER WSDOT 2. THE CURB RAMP MAXIMUM RUNNING f—WI LEFT 4 SEC"HON 9­03.9(3), COMPACT SLOPE SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE RAMP TO 9"'�% MAX DENSITY LENGTH TO EXCEED 15 FEET TO AVOID CHASING THE SLOPE INDEFINITELY WHEN CONNECTING TO STEEP SLOPES. WHEN ASPHA NDSCAPE TRANSMON APPLYING THE 15 FOOT MAX LENGTH, THE RUNNING SLOPE OF THE CURB RAMP SHALL BE AS FLAT AS FEASIBLE. NTS NTS NTS NTS '006, 1 1 A Y U` L A'' BLOC T STRIO"I"G OF"AV"MENT TRANSITIONS COFW J,- 10 S`INGLE DIRECTIUN CURB R'A/kAl P THERM" OPLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROWS* AD" St'fMB'O* Nu K uu F N ............ m "I ATTACH SIGN ....... ..... WITH 2 DRIVF C, 1. METAL POS""t"S' S[­lAl_L f,`31E 'fILLLSPAf' QtjiCK PUNCH > POST. 2. METAL STOP AND YIELD SIGN POSTS SHALL HAVE ALTERNATING 1' BANDS OF RED AND WHITE 3M 0 DIAMOND GRADF 0"I'l,"IJER POSTS 0 SHALL BF N("", I I f", f I 1,�, POST �CNSO COP )l If E 4" DIAM, 00" R t-`4 E R­ ........ . . SQUARE 2 x2 '14 111114,11k,"', 1)� il 20) BOLT SEE 0 GAGE. QUICK HOLE. ANCHOR LENGfH MAY BE DECREASED TO 12 0 NOTE 7 2 0 PUNCH EACH PARKING SPACE RESERVED FOR PERSONS 0 4. POST SHALL BE ROLLED CARBON SHEET STEEL, 0 GROUND SURFACE WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED 1, No ASTIVI A570 GRADE 50 AND BE HOT DIPPED BY A REFLECTORIZED SIGN PERMANENTLY POSTED t GALVANIZED AASHTO M-120 YIELD STRENGTH IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM EACH 2' MINIMUM A Loll 4 60,000 PSI MIN. POST SHALL HAVE 7/16 0 STALL OR SPACE CONSISTING OF A PROFILE VIEW ANCHOR SQUARE DIE —PUNCHED KNOCKOUTS ON 1" CENTERS FULL RESERVED RESERVED OF A WHEELCHAIR WITH OCCUPANT IN WHITE ON 24" THERMOPLASTIC PARKING PARKING 22 8 2.5 " X 2.5 " 0. D. LENGTH, FOUR SIDES. DARK BLUE BACKGROUND. THE SIGN SHALL NOT BE CROSSWALK STRIPE SMALLER THAN 70 SQUARE INCHES IN AREA AND 7 GAUGE, 24 6—FOOT WIDE CONCRETE (TYP) E 4 7/16" HOLES ONE EACH SHALL BE CENTERED ON AND JUST BEYOND THE LENGTH SEE 5. ANCHOR SHALL HAV WHEELSTOP W/ POCKET SURFACING Wj NOTE 5. SIDE 2" FROM TOP END. FINISH SHALL BE ZINC FRONT EDGE OF THE PARKING STALL. SIGNS MAY CHANNELS FOR PER PLAN 2 2 CUBIC FT. CONRETE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED MATERIAL TO MEET ASTM STAIE 08AMM PAROW OMM 06AMM PAROW ALSO BE HUNG ON THE WALL AT THE INTERIOR THROUGH DRAINAGE A500 GRADE B. NSW f MOUFM END OF THE PARKING SPACE. SIGN MOUNTING 0 HEIGHT SHALL BE 60 INCHES ABOVE THE PARKING .SQUARE METAL POST 6. DRIVE RIVETS TO BE TL3806 3/8" DIA. 0 SPACE FINISHED GRADE. Vm WCESSME AT THE DISCRETION OF THE OWNER, AN ADDITIONAL 7. CORNER BOLTS TO BE TLCB516M. A SIGN MAY ALSO BE POSTED, IN A CONSPICUOUS 'Nt - -------- - - SPACE, AT EACH ENTRANCE TO OFF—STREET SITE SIGNS SHALL CONFORM TO THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PARKING FACILITIES, OR IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO AND VISIBLE FROM EACH STALL OR SPACE. THE 10 MIN STOP SIGN Rl—1 (30 SIGN SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 17 INCHES BY 22 EMBED ASPHALT PAVEMENT INCHES IN SIZE WITH LETTERING NOT LESS THAN 1 LEFT TURN MUST YIELD R10-1201 INCH IN HEIGHT, WHICH CLEARLY AND #3 REBAR PRE —DRILL DO NOT ENTER R5-1 (30 CONSPICUOUSLY STATES THE FOLLOWING: 5/8" HOLE & FILL NO RIGHT TURN R3-1 (30 "UNAUTHORIZED VEHICLES PARKED IN DESIGNATED W/ EPDXY NO LEFT TURN R3-2 (30 DISABLED PARKING SPACES NOT DISPLAYING RIGHT TURN ONLY R3-5R DISTINGUISHING PLACARDS OR LICENSE PLATES WIDTH PER PLAN LEFT TURN ONLY R3-5L ISSUED FOR PHYSICALLY DISABLED PERSONS MAY BE TOWED AWAY AT OWNER'S EXPENSE. TOWED VEHICLES MAY BE RECLAIMED AT OR OR BY TELEPHONING ACCESSIBLE LOADING* R7-801A (18"X9")-, MODIFIED TO READ "ACCESSIBLE LOADING AUTHORIZED VEHICLES ONLY* R4-3 (30"X36"): MODIFIED TO READ "AUTHORIZED VEHICLES ONLY DURING SCHOOL HOURS* R4-3 (30"X36"): MODIFIED TO READ "DURING SCHOOL HOURS NTS *TRIPI"'G VISITOR PARKING R4-3 (30"X36")- MODIFIED TO READ "VISITOR PARKING AND LOADING C R 0 WA L K ISS N AND LOADING* Ao"Irk VISITOR PARKING* R4-3 (3001X36").- MODIFIED TO READ "VISITOR PARKING if PERMIT Num Xx_xxxxxx_xx OMS STAFF PARKING* R4-3' (30"X36"): MODIFIED TO READ "OMS STAFF PARKING CURB LANE LOADING ONLY* R4-3 (30"X36"): MODIFIED TO READ "CURB LANE LOADING ONLY CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A MOCK UP OF ALL MODIFIED SIGNS TO ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO ORDER OR PURCHASE OF SIGNS --- APPROVED NTS NTS NTS Wt' E E L S`T 0 V4 4 S I T E S I A G`E A D" A OPA R' 'K` I'N'G S T A L L b" I G4 'N'' TP I DA I L_ I LAND USE/PERMIT SUBMITTAL RESUBMITTAL #1 6/21/2019 LAJ UJ F- C'4 ui (0 C:)LL CC C) Luce) ;?r 01 28977 AISS T SIONAL 0-0- V-I Date: 04/15/2019 Job No..- 21739 Drawn By. CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description Z 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 ZI�2 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 & I A",, PAVIINU A D E T A I L Z03' -t CO CC CO ZZ) <C 00 C14 U J to CD C'4 7- 73 uj V) x I ----- -< C:) LL SL ct 4CT C) Lu -n Cf) 00 Lu-W Lij 04 z LU Z PP, 0 "T- CL C/) uj P1*1 VIII Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 2 1739 Drawn By: C 1 1 L Checked by: S B P Revisions # Date Description A-j-4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 ZL: 6/21/2019. LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 P + k RAMP QZ.5jo x,, 10 FOUND, M IN CASE, BELOW RIM —0.32A THE INIERSEC'nON OF NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CTCO) 302 PL & 25 PL S. OR CERTIFICATE OF /? 5"M 0AI APPROVED OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL TOR WATER AND FRONTAGE DATE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF LANU USE/PERMff FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ! :2`µ yYM 00 Lu CC Cn co " Ql) to U-j UJ C) < III CD X :D It- wm 00 W ,-771 t. Date. 04/15/2019 Job NO.: 21739 m urawn By: "" RL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description Z� 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT Z2 RESUBm""ITTAL 1 ff %mm KuiNT/'v-%\(3E Apow4b, 'a & Ar lk It I I I I IV &-wr PVI STA: 1, 2 + 87.. 00:' K: 2.3 1 ............... ............................ .................. .......... ...... .......... ...... ................ ...... ......... ....... ................. N: C.0 0)... cr) ........ ......... . 0:00 + m ...... . . . . . . . . PVI STA:1 + 1: 4.00, Uj W > .... PVI STA:.l 1+72.00, ...... PVI'....ELEV'479'8.0 ....... > .... ........ ...... ....... 500 ...... ...... ........... ........... ...... .............. ......... ...... ......... ................. .......... ..... . K: 4.8 2 0 VC:20iO.2. C .2 0, 00 ....... ...... oo ....... :­tt N. 00, r-­ ........ 00 r,--. ................ ............... 49ij ........ ....... ...... ...... .......... ...... ........ ........... ........ ........ ....... ........... ...... Ldl PVI' ELEV:474'.13 ........... V�T Ld ....... K-4.7� m ....... C 2 0 00 ......... C14 > m 0 ........ .... .......... ...... ...... ....... .......... .......... ....... ........... ........ .... ... ...... ...... ...... ....... ..... ...... QO ........... .............. ........... ....... .......... ...... Fmm m CL... > ... V). 0 + am ............... ................ ...... ............ .......... ....... ........ 48V ........ .......... ......... ...... .................... ...... Cl) .. ........ ... FLOW LINE 4Y10'. . . . . . . . Cl) C/L OF ROW .......... ... .... ...... ......... ............. ............ ....... .............. ......... ....... ............ .......... ............... TYPE-1 8D#5 m........ ...... . ...... ...... 0 .......... ....... STA 1 3+30.79t 1,& 26 LT ........... ............... .... .... -URB ........ TOP OF Vl RIM, 489�.55. .......... CK IE� 486-050- (1-2 S) 0 ....... .... L---J ...... ............ ........... .... .. .......... 6­0B-TYPE ...... 470 .......... ........ ...... ...... WE)# ............. STA. 13+25 �94 '15,081- RT . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A 89.01 RIM ........ C MO %B 110W. E 'm ..... 0 4`6.00:-(12P` N) IN... IE STA.' 12+6411' 47.58' 'RT IE '486.00: (12", SW) U T RIM, 482.56, ........... ......... .... .............. .1-27 ....... ............ ............... ............ 470 ......... ......... ............... ...... F SD#41 3 TYPE 1 14A -M AK e%of . . . . . . S RT TA. 12+6014i 940 -t Mlv'N FILTERRA :81)#1 CR RIM 482.12 . ... . . . . . . . . . .:STA.� -11+9 &37:49,13,� MRT . . . W/CURB INLET E 478.80 (12: S) 0 UT IM A R 481.73 13+29,89, 18.311,0 -RT ....... 4f U .... ...... ...... ....... IE 78.73 (1 2"]­E) -IN OF,,.,STRUCTURE 89­35=4,01 -.00 ...... .......... 465 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 LF 1 2 S D @ 1 8 :IE lt85�90 (12## NW) IN IE 478,73 (12 NW) 'OUT . . . . :IE .4 81'32'(l 2 S) OUT Al' S[)#lFt 4A r-E SD#23-, w*B TYPE: 1 DIVERSION' FILTERRA STA. 12+350-1 7,or,8 I RT INLET RIM 482.36 W/CURB ....... ............ IN' 460 IE 79.50 (12" STA. 11+72.89.1 'l .6,50 RT STA- 10+8-9.30, 13.30'.: RT . . . i A R-A 76.79 '477.30 IE: -479.50 (12' W) OUT . . . ... RI 7�.4' (12" E) lN I E 475.2-2 IE 467.07, (12! �E) -IN E. 472�64 (12" W) - OUT, .......... ........ ........ .......... ............. ........... ................ ........ ......... ........ L( 455 ....... ... ........ ....... .................. ...... ... N-� -�J- 0) W (0 �O �D m 0-) 1 . . . . . . �r) T- 0 N m 0 Q 00 0 0,10 . . . . . . (C) 00 C) (0 . . . . . . . . . 00 V- d) 0 0, 00 0o 0.0 ... oo 00 r-l- 00,00 im t C 00 00.00 . . . 00,00 . . . . 1 00 00 00 -j. Oct . . . . . . gl-- LL LL __j J.* U . . . . . . . LL Lj- LLj LJ .......... 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 9+80 '100+00 EGCL EXISTING fill . ... . ..... S 30011H ST STA 10%+00 14+00 1111"I", FINISHED A f"Af)[11 AT SC/ALE: 1 =2u^$ H 1 "=5$ V STA. 11+10.9 Ot 16.00 RT BEGIN CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALN 81 L F 1 Z2 SD @ 5.870 41 LF 12 SD @ 8.6 % NO L A R STA PC LCC`ATl0lkN' TOP OF CURB ELEVATION_ FLOW LIlkN'E ELEVATIOIN' CA 101, 1 STA PT LO /-\T iN PC 1/4 1/2 3/4 PT 1 :35�25' 89,660 25' 12+10.1 2s 18.26 LT RAMP 479.50 480.33 480.01 480.87 480.37 480.97 480-50 RAMP 480.51 12+35.09, 43.15$ LT 2 35.45' 90.31 25' 12+63.87p 44.00 LT RAMP 480.64 481.17 480.93 481.76 481.26 482.23 481.73 483.38 482.88 12+88.54s 18.53' LT 3 35.36 900 25' 12+10.03f 16.00' RT RAMP 479.43 480.27 480.06 48 1.1 �i 480.69 481.80 481.31 RAMP 481.94 12+35.03, 41.00' RT 4 ........... 35.36 900 25' 12+65.03� 41.00 RT RAMP 482.23 482.61 482-18 482.94 482.44 483.21 482.71 484.05 483.55 12+90.03, 16.00' RT RAMP C-509 38 LF 12' 28 LF 12 SD @ 2.0% SD @ 1 .8%0 1011 c­: IE 479.85 (12" N) OUT FROM ON SITE CB '4� ..O� lAwk 00TIllm all am Rl 33 P All SCALE.- 1 fp =20 f 0 0" PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (111'N'DEX) EX CONTOUR 230 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR rommm p.L- ffs F-F� 78.0 Ll FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING 4 4e N CONCRETE PAVEMENT 41, 0,10 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 7­7 ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT GRIND AND OVERLAY GRAVEL SURFACING __j WA SITE ALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER EZ T-71, PRE-SETTLII`NG BASIN/SAIND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD ki AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 00 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 imp= 11111111111 111 jjl�j I STORM DRAINAGE PIPE ACE DRAIN FOOTING/SUBSURFA A- - - ----- - -- ---- DETENTION FACILITY SDCO IA STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FDC,O FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT f� 4 oe PC CO ............ LF 12 Ile" Cl) @ 0.970 W JI 0 0) 00 00 0) -A 41- 00 z Fmm 0 It . ..... -00" Z 0 . ... .. ... ... . ..... ....... W Lq C) �MP C-5 0 Uj. ........... . .. .. ............ . F- 3�: LO Lj W N Z (o() W xj Z D U. CL LIL 4% 4" F- -�'l N N Z CF) X j Z CT) W Nt I Ag V& - v- V) (N 0 0 C) U + + 1,0 , 1,­­- CID U- C\j Cc- 0 U-) to CO C.0 4LO W --D co co 00 00 NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) > 4,4- qj- C. 44- 1�4- '0 Ld Uj W C%4 OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE (n 0% (n of �!J- 490- APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE 4 IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION APPROVED AM W1 ITTA L = PROE 5"' mum mbw` M ITTAL -1 an 60" / 2 1 /' 2"' Oft 1 0 `4 ce) rv_ 00 00 C14 Uj CD C'4 < x Ql) < LL Ct Uj F- c> U) z Uj Z 0 3: LU Uj A 777 V �7 77,777"n"; D at e 04/15/2019 Job No..* 21739 Drawn BY: CRL Checked by. S B Revisions # Date Description 4/ 5 /20 1^ ADDENDUM 03 L2 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 IFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C-501 BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, STA 14+00 INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. .......... ...... ...... ...... .............. ........ .......................... ........ ........ .......... ........ ........... ...... SD#10,�CRWPEI ....... tow-- .......... '6',+'8Q - 14' ...... ...... STA' 1. 1'5'08'.) Rl .... ........ . ........ RIM- 478.56: .: C> W 0 ... IE r-_,� co 475.55 (121$ E) IN .......... 480 ...... ....... IE 475 ................. ........ .55 (12" SW) OUT . ...... ...... ...... .............. W ........... ............. .............. 510 ......... ....... C0 C FLOW LINE 0 ...... .... PVI STAA 4+46.00 C/L OF ROW ... .......... ...... -508'.02 PVI` ELEV co ... ... .......... jOP OF CURB K-6.49 V) LO 7 > . . . . . LVC-200.00 47Q .......................... ........ ...... -0 .......... ................ .............. .... ......... .................... ........ ........... ....... .... ... ...................................... ........ ................ ........... ...... ..... ...... ... .... .. ................ ....... TOP OF CURB + C/L OF ROW z ...... U) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . U-J, FLOW LINE ........ -j uj ...... '0, uj 0... 470 . . . . . . C-000 (IQ ...... ..................... ...... ...... ....... ...... .............. ...... . .. ..... ARM .............. ...... ........ ........ ....... ........ .... .... .... . ;J00 .......... ................ ...... ...... ...... ...... LIJ 0 V) S`D#3Fj- 4X4 PEAK m z ..... ............ > D - I E R I F I L T E R: R A VI STA: 16+ 6 0 P* 7 '.0 , (Cl (NO CURB INLET) ...... 46o ............. ......... ... ....... ......... ........... ......... ......... PVI ELEV.479.49, ...... ...... STA. .......... 15+66.56; 16.50, R ...... .. ....... ........ .......... ......... .......... ............ ........... ...... ...... ...... ......... Kt2.67: TOP OF STRUCTURE 489.94-491.00- . ........... IV ':30-00 . . ...... IE 485. ..... ...... 86 (1 2" NE) IN' 10011 IE 483-28 (121) SE) OUT 0 ...... ...... 460 ............ ...... ......... ........... ... 'Ek-SDC B-­ ................... ...... ........................... ............. .......... ...... .......... ...... ......... r4 :, . ­. I I ..... � � �:. 11 - . ....... 0 ............. ............................. ......... ......... ........ ....... %of . I : . I 49 31 LF 12" SD @ 1,6% ........ ... 8D" %B-TYPE-1 .............. ......... LO STA. 17+63.75) 62) RT ST.A. - 1-6+55.81 47.58 ...... RIM' 465.06 RIM 482.79 ...... .... ...... D3111 QB - TYPE- I -IE: 479.84 .(12 NE) -IN ... ........... ....... : RT .... STA. 17 + 3 5.1 61' 1 5.08, 1 45%5 ............ ........ ...... IE: 466.33 (I 2" W), OUT� 485 ........... ...... ............ '(Z) ()0, ....... E: 466.33 (1. 2." . S) OUT 17 LO m 00 D#7 CB TYPE 1 U-) , 410' PEA W#4 o r\ RIM 489.58 STA 15+68-4s, 15,41' LT:' ."DIVERS10"N'"RUIERRA 450 0.00- ... .... ...... ...... .......... IE 486 OUT .50 (I m ........ ....... ......... 'P* "'K DIVERSI 480 ....... ...... ......... ...... > ....... A ON (NO CURB INLET) 'm ca ........ STA. 17+78.42, 16.0 1 RT SIC" %f.*,*#B TYPE 11.11-1.. PVI .:ST A,:l,6+09,-00e- .'ELEV. -471,.32 STA 1 5 + 7 3. 0 1 5.1%:, RT 46930 PV RIM 489,02 (I 2 W)� OUT .... K:3-.39 IE 486.00 (12" N) IN Lvc..30.00 IE 486.00 (12 S) OUT 445 ..................... ........ ....... ...... Q0 01 Ln . . . . 00 In 0 0 Ln QO 00 Lo 00 L( 00 L( . . . . . . L0 I 00 LO, Cl\l . . . . . 00 (_0 Lo - Ln . 0 Ln �. �D ...... Ln ..... _j. Q LO It4) " )') I .1 I . :, _j. Q 0 00, 00 00 CO ()O . . . . . . 't . . . . . . . . LL_ I Lj- 1, Lj LL_ 00 0) CD 0 00 0) 00 0*). 0� C> ..... Ln o,o ..... Ln o*).o ......... qt,q . ...... __j _j Lo.Ln .... Ln u u ...... j, u Ll J,U Li- CD Li- Li- LL. (D LL_ . . . . . . . . U _�.J, u _j,u . . . LL_ 1� Lj_ Ljj I I LLJ LL_ i- LJ ...... ...... ....... ....... ....... ......... LL] ....... 'LAJ �j LL_ LL_ ...... L ......... ............. .......... ........ ............. ............ ........ LLj A Id IV OV 14+00 15+00 10+00 17+00 + GRADE FL FINISHED S 300TH ST - STA 14+00 8+80 G�RADE AT FLOWLINE FINISHED GRADE SCAL - 1 2 0 H 1 5' V /VT TOP OF CURB C ul cr) 00 LO Co IFm_= Mai '00 00Z Z) T. UJ LIJ LO Ld Uj LLJ C--4 z V) mo� U. Ln z x Z u *WAAWAW m + V) WE - - .d I9 90 40 4 99'' 9 Fum 49 a m S%'0300TH ST a- PLAN K f"%7IrC:0u I ILMMI I I 1. EXISTING UNDERGROUND POWER AND VAULT ARE UNDER THE PROPOSED INTERSECTION. AT THE VAULT, THE GROUND WILL BE LOWERED BY APPROXIMATELY 6-INCHES. UNDER THE CONDUIT, THE GROUND WILL BE LOWERED BY UP TO 1.2-FEET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH PSE TO POTHOLE THE CONDUITS PRIOR TO ANY FRONTAGE WORK AND TO DETERMINE EXISTING COVER. AT THE DIRECTION OF PSE, LOWER THE CONDUIT AND VAULT TO PROVIDE REQUIRED COVER. 2. EXISTING GAS LINE AND VALVE ARE UNDER THE PROPOSED INTERSECTION. AT THE GAS VALVE, THE GROUND WILL BE LOWERED BY UP TO 2-FEET. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH PSE TO POTHOLE THE GAS LINE PRIOR TO ANY FRONTAGE WORK AND TO DETERMINE EXISTING COVER. AT THE DIRECTION OF PSE, LOWER THE GAS LINE AND VALVE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED COVER. 3. EXISTING UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION CONDUIT IS UNDER THE PROPOSED INTERSECTION. AT THE CONDUIT, THE GROUND WILL BE LOWERED BY UP TO 6-INCHES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH PURVEYOR TO POTHOLE THE CONDUIT PRIOR TO ANY FRONTAGE WORK AND TO DETERMINE EXISTING COVER. AT THE DIRECTION OF PURVEYOR, LOWER THE CONDUIT TO PROVIDE REQUIRED COVER SCALE: 1 "-20' PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR 230 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR FF 78*v FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION Ex BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING k AENT CONCRETE PAVEm 0 0 0 0 a 0*02 0 0 0 0 *<a A H EAVY D UTY CONCRETE ASPHA PAVEMENT LT (AC) NO 0,� q 41 to kv, 00 0, 0, 0 9 0, HEAVY DU _ry ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT GRIND AND OVERLAY GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER PRE -SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREfA\//YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETENTION FACILITY S D (,�O STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT (.,,'O' FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DS DOWNSPOUTS .................. ............ ....... ... . SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION' SSMH BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS ..... .. . ...... WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION I TOP OF, CURB ELEVATIUIN- L I 0 1%1 L R K I STA PC LOCATION FLOW LINE ELEVATI01\4 STA PT LOCATION /-% PU 1/4 1/2 A 3/4 PT 5 33' 68.01 29.5' 1 6+09.00P 21.24) LT 483.70 483.20 482.67 482.18 481.68 481.32 480.73 480.72 480.59 480.32 16+27.14t 48.81' LT 6 35.23' 89.58* 25' 1 6+55.89) 42.81 LT RAMP 480.74 481.06 480.7 .481.01 480.51 - 479.71 479.46 RAMP 478.38 16+80.99t 18.09' LT 7 35.36 900 25' 1 6+01.73) 1 6.00 1 RT 485.28 484.78 4 5 �4.2 7 483.77 483.41 482.91 483.06 482.58 RAMP 483.00 16+26.732 41.00t RT Oft rm 8 35.3b 900 25' 16+56.73) 41.00' RT RAMP 482.36 482-17 481.6� 481.16 480-9� 479.75 479.65 RAMP 478.34 16+81.73, 16.00' RT A6 AS 'I I APPROVED ED-_m W,-"71 "t 00 Cf) C) x LL ul CV) U) z CL 0 Cf) W _j Lu Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019 L U/PERMIT ZI RESUBMITTAL #1 Ah Cu-MEN CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER q75J0 0 00 C)///�\� STREE ....... ..... LO Lo .....Lj .. ,. + ., e_., ..,. ......, ,. ... ,. .....,.. 4— Nzr WAN> < 4,4- mono= Z < —0) ^' CD s00 C) i P Cu' �mm A A A' b A A A � A i .rwwrr ��+wrr.•..P�+r�.nw+rw a w.w,. ....,.,�.., CONCF •0 MOUNTABLE iAI - iZ.5.0 I QZ5o7 CIRCLE W/ CL 4000 CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT "YIELD" SIGN ROUNDABOUT R—P SIGN ON EX POST REMOVE EX STOP SIGN " K`8�� 2'0 MOUNTABLE TRAFFIC nl l 1 1- VM I nlAl l , 1r''..` U/7--5-o-f CIRCLE C 00 CEMENT �U J 1 MEG i L1Vf-1 1 11VV r-GF\ ELEC PLANS LANDSCAPE PLANTER PLANTING PER LA PLANS . L NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) CAR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ADA RAM P (TYP) -- 07, CROSSWAI..K STRIPE IZ750J ADJUST SEWER MANHOLE RIM Tn PDAnc S 300TH ST - PLAN SCALE. 1 "=20' R6-5P SIGN ON EX POST CROSSWALK STRIPE ASPHALT PAVEMENT 6 (TYP)_ill --5o . 0-. , . , . e .rA f i I_ 1 Q l 1 i 11 41J 1 L...1 N ELEC PLANS LANDSCAPE PLANTED PLANTING PER LA PLANS ONC Lr T[ BSIL L�,WA[_ a PROPERTY DINE 0 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) PROPOSED CONTOUR v 0,02 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 4 ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (A)PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL ..... ...... .... ..,. VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER Ll -' ` PRE --SETTLING BASIN/SAND F .111 1)/NV QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE P/ AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE ", .... . STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN OA` DETENTION FACILITY STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT t FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT -. w. SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH --- BOLLARD x FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS 5WATER SERVI CE LINES w- WATER METER r .~.. WATER SERVICE LINES '-- FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION It 00 co , 0) ch 00 N to LL! to -� c) F— Q Ll.l x a LL r— W 00 F-- W to Lu W Z Q Z D 0 t/7 W ..,,I P*- Lu •r-' M • upigNii i { Ir 'q►`s 1M► a �s, t t , ` ? b: s; 4 k IIII Date. 04/1 /2019 0 N .. 21739 Drawn By. CCRL Checked by. BBP Revisions Date Description A ZLADDENDUM /1 /2919 03 2\ 6/21/201 LU/PERM IT REBUBIMITTAL. #1 S 0" k U T H 3" U10" 61 0 T H FKurNTAGE ft a P& AV I IN GN EL 5 b SII a% ,�, `ST PLA SCALE. 1 "=20' O TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) CAR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL. , BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STOR WATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. PROPERTY LINE 230� PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) _.231 PROPOSED CONTOUR HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT f4k HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT � .. _ .. ..... \ _.,., \ .. ,, S M 1 ^• 9 A� q wry, rohv i. `r...» GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER . PRE —SETTLING BASIL/SAND F QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE P/ AREA/YARD DRAIN kms°I CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 $A CATCH BASIL TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN 'k DETENTION FACILITY #..#.. i STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT „h. FOOTING DRAIN C LEAN O UT DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE i Y SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH ...-- BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS x 7 WATER SERVICE LINES —--- WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES `~- FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION a Y° n r' , it S l S; f. { •glMll Date: 0/1 %2019 Job No.. 21739 Drawn By: C R L Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description /1 /2019 ADDENDUM 93 2 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RBBUBMITTAL #1 L A a m ANU USE/PEKMIT SUBm AL N.' 01% ' IIIIIIIIIIIM� 1 ■ r NTS 4 1L } STANDARD CATCH BA TYPE I 1 I ,I,C W t INL ROW C/L m HALF ROW 30 1 DRIVING LANE - PLANTER STRIP SIDEWALK - 1 MIN. 31 20% MAX 2 1 MAX 2% TYP ,�.1(TYPICAL) EXISTING ASPHALT SLOPE 2 _----__ SAW —CUT SLOPE 2 ..........,u. - 1. t I N TYPE S CONSTRUCT STREET SECTION PER FEDERAL WAY CROSS SECT. O (DWG NO. 3 -2 ), WITH MODIFICATIONS SHOWN. STREET LIGHTING PER 2. SAW -CUT FULL DEPTH WHERE NEW PAVEMENT ABUTS EXISTING AND APPLY ELEC PLANS; TACK COAT. " LANDSCAPE PLANTER PLANTING PER LA 3. PLACE ASPHALT IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT APWA SECTION 5--04. H MA CLASS /2 ASPHALT CONCRETE PLANS 4. PROOF ROLL AND REMOVE ANY SOFT SPOTS. REPLACE REMOVED MATERIAL PG 2 PAVEMENTHALL E X UNDISTURBED WITH GRAVEL BORROW. CONTRACTOR S TEST AND VERIFY SUBGRADE PAVEMENT SUB --BASE MEETS COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO PAVING. �� 2 CRUSHED SURFACING UST BE COMPACTED M TO 95 MAX. DENSITY 5. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER MAY PREPARE TOP COURSE PER ASTM D 155M7 AND SUBMIT A CEOTECHNICAL STUDY TO PROPOSE A CUSTOM SECTION. 't CRUSHED MIN CR COURSE BASE C B CEMENT CONCRETE 5. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE OWNERS GEOTECHNIAL ENGINEERING THE SUBGRADE PRIOR SURFACINGRVE REPRESENTATIVE SHALL OBSERVE THE CONDITION OF PER WSDOT SECTION CURB AND CUTTER TO PLACEMENT OF CSBC, TO CONFIRM THAT THE SUBGRADE IS SUITABLE. IF C. Q f CO PACT TO SOFT, LOOSE, E ORGANIC O R OTHERWISE SE UNSUITABLE AREAS ARE IDENTIFIED, n MAX DENSITY 95� THE OWNERS GEO TECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPRESENTATIVE WILL PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PREPARE THE SUBGRADE. NTS F u N T A (3' E I M R 00' , `V E ma" EINiff ZS = S 3 u" ' 0" T H S T R' " E E T NATIVE SUBBASE� ACP TRENCH RESTORATION I so MINIMUM 3" PG 64-22► .. MATCH WHICHEVER IS GREATER EXISTING BASE `';; 5/8" MINUS BACKFILL R TRENCH PAVEMENT RESTORATION MATCH EXISTING DEPTH SEAL JOINT LIMITS, 1' BACK FROI~`tI PCCP PAVEMENT IS TO EDGE OF TRENCH EXCEPT BE CONSTRUCTED PER EXISTING ACP IF WITH 3' OF JOINT THEN WSDOT STANDARD 5--05 USE 1 " EPDXY COATED REPLACE TO JOINT 3" MIN. WI NTH .15' MIN.. SMOOTH DOWEL BAR . 5' MIN. EXISTING BASE !!!4i 4.+BAR a5' BA NATIVE SUBBASE 0,11111: 11 LENGTH P C C" P TREIN'u" 5,®' MINDS BACKFILL ESTORATION N1 R FOR TIENOH,2 MATCH EXISTING ACP PAVEMENT RESTC RATIO N COMPACTED DEPTH WITH HMA It PG 4�,--'�,�. SEAL JOINT LIMITS, 1' BACK FROM EDGE OF TRENCH EXCEPT MATCH EXISTING DEPTH EXISTING ACP .�r..r,.r.._ �' IF WITH 3 OF JOINT THEN PCCF PAVEI�EE S BE CONSTICTL PER BE REPLACE TO JOINT STANDARD--C US[""" 1" EPDXY COATED SMOOTH DOWEL BAR ~3' MIN. WIDTH .15' MIN. .' MIN. EXISTING BASE 'W 0. ' BAR NATIVE SUBBASE LENGTH 5/8" MINUS BACKFILL ACP 0 VM. w [x it I, I ICI r;NCI.! 1, TRENCH RE:'STORATION NOTES: 1) FOR TRENCHES LESS THAN 1 B" WIDE, USE 1 CEO% CIF FOR TRENCH BACKFILL. ') FOR TRENCHES GREATER THAN 1 " WIDE, ALL BACKFILL IN RIGHT--OF—WAY SHALL B L MIN. " CSTC. 11. PUBLIC M8 "A,0 DWGm NO. TRENCH RESTORATION 3=28 wry WORKS NTS TRENCH R'AESTONATI 0"IN 15' MAX ;. t✓GIVILIN 1 L.vlvuINtw,.I t— I INnI I I CUB AND CUTTER NTS C W'SITI"'S P* URB TK IN UN 0 CHAIN LINK FENCE— Gp .9 7777, 7 MAk h I ! °( X 12 MIN, THICKNESS OF 2"--4" QUARRY SPALLS ;' t ,,a ,>+ SIQEWALK w �I + z 00 GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR DRAINS co + 0.02 F7. uj N O 1 E S e 1. SEE SEC. 5.01. WSDOT/APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATION SECTION 9-03.12[ ]. FACE OF ROCKERY OR RETAINING WALL MUST BE A MIN. OF 1O FT. FROM TRAVELED WAY IF ROCKERY OR RETAINING `� WALL I BEHIND ROLLED CURB OR ON A RURAL SECTION. CHAIN LINK FENCE TYPE 4 WSDOT APWA STANDARD PLANS), REQUIRED WHEN ROCKERY HEIGHT IS 18 IN. OR GREATER. WSDOT%APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATION SECTION 9— 33. C. THE ROCK FACING FOUNDATION AND/OR KEYWAY IS TO BE CLEARED OF ORGANIC MATTER AND DEBRIS AND THE UNDERLYING MINERAL SOIL COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM 9% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY. NTS E ::.. G C00*4 OW I1*%T ff R' u' C" FACING CUSCT :...� ::. . r. r�; e 1 VAOLI I1:lil(1')fI1 t,.IIk1i, NDt,I.111'IYII, 'CURB (N(Tl ICY C,ON I'IA'f I) � INLET TRAM 17 0P1 J1t ', 1: :� RI,l1NI,1;( l�LIAL "IF REQUIRED II�IIA 1%i PIPE 1*: , NOT BY CONTECH .... � � " � 1')"" ('44 .4, kAJII �I VAI I I `� " (LOCATION' VARIES) yt 1.1' $III1 JI I ` I j j (WI DI,:1RD RAIN A � I E4 ml / =a, " �" I 7" 0 CLEANOUT F _;S'S Mal, 2" 0 IRRIGATION PORT (TYP 3 PLACES) a I I 1 I.�....,.... 1 I OUTLET PIPE SS NOT BY CONTECH - , OUTLET ACCESS C E (LOCATION VARIES) 2a U' -.. ...__...,. _MEDIA BAY MIN ._.. PLAN VIEW I , i "i{ a y $ i� t = n { 3 a t 00 PLANT PROVIDED BY GONTEGH ALTERNATE ORIENTATION ENERGY DISSIPATION -- ROCKS 'INLET PIPE !"�9OT BY C ONTECH *CURB.-..*- .. t °i E0UIFRE0 (LOCATION VARIES) INLET 6-(,,;(,,;JD) _ . ' INLET BAY SETTLING POOL ELEV. OUTLET PIPE NOT BY CONTECH ,_.__. � FLOVVKIT (LOCATION VARIES) TREE FRAME AN D GRATE CAST INTO TOP SLAB CLEAN OUT FRAME AND COVER CAST INTO TOP SLAB — TOP SLAB ♦ IRRIGATION •" (TY• PLACES) 3" MULCH LAYER, Nr p N ., Y r D STONE LAYER, TYP PROVIDED CONTECH .. y MEDIA y PROVIDED BY CONTECH CURB AND GUTTER, TYP (NOT BY CONTECH) 4r ,STREET a CURB INLET DETAIL IL. FTPD-D DEEP wr TION CONFIGURATION DESIGNATION (O -►NS: -P, AVAILABILITY,,,IA r► Y rr*MAX. LENGTH/MA BYPASS _-T -PT BAYFL (W x L) ACCESS r OPENING (CFS) FTPD0404- o r�� III rl�� N ,� I �� ui �I" °r► " llll � 11111 i 3� 3 FTPD0406—D D iL, it :�' �"' ■� 10- 00 LjA � c rn CV (0 ca cv < W � yC c) L- co h- to W Im W MR rn � W z Q T = D 0 W W �- I- • •A y .� (0 y 4 1`IIM e, i t 77 ' r MII11wr �e A. fi. f ,,. �IMIIIIII 77 s 77 ��IIII a Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn y: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions Date Description 1 4/15/201 ADDENDUM O 2 5/21 /2019 L PERMIT U/ RESUBMITTAL 1 FKUNTAuE PU` " E T A I L b" II ANSI"IION SIDEWALK -**----DISTANCE WILL VARY -SEE I 'l L I SAWCUT MATCH LIFE (TYP) E, SIDEWALK ''I,--' ''I-�,�1-11-lil.,-'',""""-1-1-1-�--, I - 11 111 1 1 1 1 C MENT CONC. BARRIER CURB MIDI. ' MIN. IIs4 TRANSITION SEE DOTE 2 (TYP) SPl'.„ NC I (,;. SIDEWALK SEE NOTE 1 r LX. SIDEWALK 000000000,00 00000000000 CCU RB & .... ... ......M. ... GUTTER , DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE - SEE DETAIL __ 5% MAX. CENTER OF RAMP AS SLOPE .MARKED IN THE FIELD CEMENT CONCRETE BARRIER CURB PER DWG 3-4. TOP OF CURB TO BE FLUSH WITH TOP BACK OF EXISTING SIDEWALK TRANSITION SIDEWALK TYP. EACH END OF RAMP, .�.� S (NEEDED - SEE NOTE 1 CEMENT CONC. BARRIER CURB TRANSITION SIDEWALK " MII' . II . ll�. DISTANCE WILL TRANSITION N SEE NOTE 2 ITYP)-w-j-"'*-SEE NOTE VARY - SEE NOTE 1 SIDE +'ALK SEE NOTE 1 SAWCUT MATCH F 0 W, � A LINE (TYP) E. SIDEWALK ::E EX. SIDEWALK +► v a e► e ss * w w r 000000004Q�I w� y r � v v�► v. w 00000000000 .PLANTER STRIP ... 00000000000 ** • PLANTER STR I w s w e w aaw s e. w w +raw CURB.__....._... _... _ __ .._... __.. GUTTER � DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE - SEE DETAIL . DUMMY JOINT (TYP) CENTER of RAMP AS SLOPE MARKED IN THE FIELD CEMENT CONCRETE RETE BARRIER CURB PER D1�d G - . TC P of CURB TO BE FLUSH 'KITH ,fi�P/lvc,,/ TOP ACC: of EXISTING SIDEWALK - ��y TRANSITION SIDEWALK (TYP, EACH END OF RAMP) SEE MOTE EXISTING SIDEWALK „ - -- DETECTABLE WARNING •"�" ..*$�.�°.�•.*` SURFACE (SEE DETAIL) • w w w w w r w w + �w w • w w w w a + a by r e + + w sir ,,,„,..*' 01 y, • � ICI I E I —ABLE WARDING t- PLANTER STRIP ".' 4 t l I I �.i,�C°v .( Ul I I .EiSr S NE'' B I" IIA.w 1.,Iw.NC TTI I OF THE TRANSITION SIDEWALK SECTION SHALL BE rQUA a TO 1 FOOT MULTIPLIED BY THE: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN " ,.,. I C I I. I Iti;I I'I" IA I" THE N AND EXISTING I I IL"� C I oMIN. A PANI..I. S. I . ,., EXISTING PANFI., CROSS —SLOPE IS 4% AND NEW .�I--'L,N PANEL GROSS SLOPIm.: IS '; FOR A DIFFERENCE OF 2. 2 r) MULTIPLIED BY 1 FOOT -, 2 I C I RANSI"('ION SECTION). I 0 `" m' � ICI°' I�,' I,�it�l... I�I`,�ILyN ��"HEro �.�-5„ �•���� _ �G..., THE NEW AND EXISTING CROSS -SLOPES E D 0.90 1,40 TRANSITION SECTION IS NOT NEEDED. . .....�_ _ 0.2 2. LENGTH (MALL BE: 5 FEET MIN. AND UP TO .3 'X' tlo----- FEET 0 8.3 (WHERE 'X' IS EQUAL TO THE LENGTH REQUIRED ELEVATION TO A►t I II "vl' 8,MAX! UM SLOPE), BUT NOT TO EXCEED 15 FEIET IN t I.;"NCB I t1 r U I f. t,.• I III °' ,ip',I'' {`,nl I ICI 1 l F E DETAIL 2017MAR an co PU8LIC CURB RAMP IN SIDEWALK [F8d8FaH WRY WORKS WITH PLANTER STRIP NT K W/ PLA"TER'A STRIP 61 SIDEWALN N '0"URB RAMP IN FOR CURB & OTTER 2" CRI S E'S�C,NC TOP,COURSE USE DETAIL 3-4 VARIES PLANTER STRIP SIDEWALK AS REQUIRED 2" CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE USE DETAIL 3— NOTES: 1, FOR JOINTS AND SCORING, SEE FEDERAL WAY STANDARD FOR SIDEWALK SPACING, EXPANSION JOINTS, D SCORE MARKS. . SEE DETAILS --59 5 , FOR MINIMUM DEPTH OF CONCRETE CRETE THROUGH DRIVEWAY SECTIONS. 3. WHEN CHECKED WITH A 10 FOOT STRAIGHTEDGE9 GRADE SHALL NOT DEVIATE MORE THAN 1, INCH AND ALIGNMENT SHALL NOT VARY MORE THAN 1 INCH. 4. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 3000, WSDOT SPEC. —1 . REV. MAR 2011 PUBLIC 111 ;Ir WORKS �� IIIIMIq III �pM DWG, I ► 3012 NTS /\ APPROVED SIDEWALK SECTIONS DATE LAND USE/PlERMIT SUBMITTAL - RES"Ou"B"'MITTAL #1 cc W�F ib �I 4 •N � w 1AR • rrrr ,�,, M � IfM 5 .,,�„��� ui�rpll� 111111Di.�•�s, r '.r .l nIIIM��IIM{ Date: 04/15/201 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CL. Checked by: SDP Revisions Date Description 1 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM o 2 5/21 /201 ZL ,_ LU/PER.MIT REUMITTAL 1 rm AA F U N T \ 6 " E T A I L E��11 PLANTER STRIP EXPANSION JOINT CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK H A K I I I_ 1, A N 1') V,, U1, PRE —CAST Cl 17 M FN T (,",'0 M 0 1,,) N "I"A 11 I_ 1I (S) E [-, 1) F T A I I, .1.1-6-0"MIN. ___]*-0"M1N. i &-( MAX. I (SEE NOTE 2) PLANVIEW SIDEWALK RAMP PLAN A -AL L;� BMW B � �= G E D ELEVATION TRUNCATED DOMES DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE DETAIL ISOMETRIC VIEW J NOTES: DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE (SEE DETAIL) 1. 00 NOT PLACE GRATINGS, JUNCTION BOXES, ACCESS COVERS CURD & GUTTER SECTION ( A TYPICAI__ ]"TAFT"IC CIF�C[_,E ..11-1111--­ ... .... ...... ..... .. ... MEMEMIT.11 7=777777777 DM. NO* 3A04v--- I L 1 0-% 12 f. ON' 15' DI A, 16 1" o[,� < 20, DIA, 1. IN�,)`TALL ONE R6­4 CHEVRON SIGN 20 iF 0 R >11 20' DIA. APPROACH, PER MUTCD FIGURE 213-22. .7 EVVA SiDE LK BUFFER STRIP CURB 5- 9" MIN. T- 0" MIN. 2 AD,.IUST MANHOLES, VALVE 2. INSTALL EACH R6.-4 SIGN 12—FEET INSIDE THE EDGE OF I BOXES� AND MONUMENT I'SLAND CURBINGo ALIGNED WITH APPROACH LANES. FINAL I V., < LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. 10 V .CASES TO NL'W G"RADE. CURB DETAIL 3. SIGNS MAY BE CONSOLIDATED TO FEWER POSTS FOR SMALLER DIAMETER CIRCLES, AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. MINI ROUNDABOUTS,-, 1. FULLY MOUNTABLE MINI ROUNDABOUT CENTER ISLANDS SHALL USE 3—INCH ROLLED CURB AS PER 'CURB 1 — ROU,NDABOUT TRUCK APRON CEMENT CONCRETE CURB, & GUTTER WSDOT STANDARD PLAN F-10.18. 2. FILL ISLAND WITHIN CURB WITH COMPACTED HMA PAVEMENT OR CIL 4,000 CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT, FINISHED TEXTURE AND COLOR MUST CONTRAST WITH ADJACENT CURB AND PAVEMENT. 3. CENTER OF ISLAND SHALL BE SLOPED AT 27o TOWARD CURB, BUIT'MAXIMUM HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 3—INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF CURB. PRECAST SLOPED CEMENT CONCRETE MOUNTABLE CURE3 2 BARK N OTES PER WSDOT STD, PLAN F-10.6 MULCH < - ,X X, RPM, TYPE 2YR 1. LANDSCAPING TO BE DETERMINED BY TRANSPORTATION/PARKS STAFF. 7 'j, 'e" ,,TOPSOIL TYPE "N 2. MONUMENT PROTECTION /PRESERVATION RAISE MONUMENT TO GRADE IN APPROPRIATE CASING. X", i 1.7-111 "7" ""'711 1 1':­,_­"_`1 I I I JIF_-JF1 111 �d 11, -:]t_1_:: ATTACH CURB WITH EPDXY PER WSDOT STANDARD REMOVE ASPHALT IN SPECIFICATIONS CEN TER OF ISLAND. TYPICAL SECTION REV. FES 20117 IRWIN= I I 0WG. NO. PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC CIRCLE DETAILS 3=59 I I I WIN I III 111 11,11: 11 1 1 11 � 1 11 1 11�ilill III III III N 11 LLJ z IL NTS K%I'T a vSED 1_0 LANE `3P1 I'TTI,`;R ISLAN() CURB 0 LANE 6tillb hAdEM'E`NT' SECTION _CUR13- TRUCK APRON SECTION UB (ROUNDABOUT CONFIGURATION WILL VARY DEPENDING ON CONTRACT PLANS) "IN, FACE OF 1201 10#0 CURB C SPUTTER ISLAND 500 711 SEE NOTE 2 CURB RAMP (TYP.) 0 - - I WAATr% DnAr'%%A1AV SIDEWALK (TYP.) -1 A X F_ fA F_ U F_ SLOPE -5- CUR13 112" (IN) R. (TYP.) R 9' LU SEE CONTRACT PLANS FOR TREATMENT (TYP.) 8" R. BUFFER ROUNDABOUT SPLITTER ISLAND CURB I NOSING CURB ROUNDABOUT TRUCK APRON CEMENT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SECTION C (ROLLED CURB) IL (SEE CONTRACT PLANS FOR R) 1/2" (IN) R. FACE OF 3/8" (IN) PREMOLDED JOINT FILLER 12" (IN) R. (TYP.) CURB 12" (IN) R. FACE OF 4" (IN) R. CURB MATCH ROADWAY 1/2" (IN) R. 4 (TYP.) MATCH ROADWAY SLOPE 4 SLOPE TOP OF TRUCK APRON V1 IF . . 7 .. 4. V .4" R. 121# R. 4 4 1511 oil 1510 91# OPTIONAL CONSTRUCTION CURB 2 CURB 3 JOINT (OUTSIDE, RIGHT SIDE OR SPLITTER ISLAND) ROUNDABOUT CENTRAL ISLAND ROUNDABOUT CEMENT CONCRETE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB CURB AND GUTTER (ROLLED CURB) (ROLLED CURB) LANE' CURB 3 NTS NV � T L) A U"Ep** / ^4\ CURB BUFFER STRIP N/ SIDEWALK 2 <�>X- 0" MIN. 5'- 0" MIN — SEE CONTRACT PLANS FOR TREATMENT (TYP.) ISLAND 10 SEE CONTRACT PLANS FOR V TREATMENT SEE CONTRACT PLANS FOR PAVING AND SURFACING (TYP.) NOTES 1 . Construct curb joints at cement concrete pavement transverse joint locations. If all adjacent pavement is HMA, see Standard Plan F-30.10 for Curb Expansion and Contraction Joint Spacing. 2. A 2 inch vertical curb may be used where low clearance vehicles or trucks are present. LEGEND <1> Width varies — See Contract Plans. CURB 2 - OUTSIDE OR RIGHT SIDE Match adjacent pavement thickness but not less than 6 inches. ROUNDABOUT TRUCK APRON CURB 3 - CENTRAL ISLAND 1;4 PARTIAL PLAN % pro* 4 E Pr"N" M I T N"O' . XX-XXXXXX AX -,r 00 LILJ co CF) co o4 (0 C> C:lu- cc C14 UJ to Lu 1—. to W :3 (L Cn t-- W 40 70:� . . . . . . . . . . . 7 �Y, Date: 04/15/2019 Job No..- 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description Z 2 6/21/2019 LUMERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 r U**'E T A I L \'A ^10%,A /0%0 -4 IV& DZI Z 19 co LU M Cr. 00,_ 00 4" x 4#1 Finish Grade Marking nail some side as cleat SKIP CENTER LINE (SCL) GENERAL NOTES: 10' 15' ft.- � --- 1. LONGITUDINAL STRIPING ON ARTERIALS SHALL BE PLASTIC TYPE D METHYLMETHACRYLATE (MMA). 15' TRANSVERSE MARKINGS SHALL BE PLASTIC TYPE TYPE 2YY RPVI/ \_4" YELLOW LINE (TYP) A. ALL OTHER STRIPING SHALL BE PAINT. SEE NOTE 6 2. ALL STRIPING WITHIN INTERSECTIONS SHALL BE PLASTIC TYPE A OR D. DOUBLE YELLOW CENTER LINE (DYCL) Al I RPM'S SHALL BE LOCATED TO PROVIDE 30 ---40 f 4 INCHES BETWEEN STRIPING AND RPM'S. 28" < > 4 > 4. TYPE 2 RPM'S SHALL BE USED ON ALL Two double 4" YELLOW LINE ARTERIALS AND COLLECTORS, IF STRIPED headed nails SEE NOTE 6 Cleat 281sx3l'x2s' A\ 5. WHERE TYPE C CURB IS USED IN PLACE OF under sign >1-V STRIPING, USE RPM PATTERN APPLICABLE TO THE 1 00 30 STRIPING BEING REPLACED. 1 28 TYPE 2YY RPM (Typ)-/ 4" x 4" Post WHITE EDGE LINE (WEL) SPECIFIC NOTES: NOTES: Aluminum cleat attached WHITE LINE 6. IF MMA IS U'SFED,," \1%4A, SHALL BE PROFILED. SIGN POSTS 4w, 1) ALL GROUND MOUNTED SIGN POSTS SHALL USE WESTERN RED CEDAR 7. WHERE RAISED MEDIAN OR TYPE C CURBING OR PRESSURE TREATED FIR UNLESS APPROVED OTHERWISE BY PUBLIC IS USED, USE TYPE 2YR RPMPS, WITH RED WORKS. FACING OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC. 2) POST GRADE (FIR) SHALL BE S4S DOUGLAS FIR LUMBER, WEST YELLOW EDGE LINE (YEL) COAST INSPECTION BUREAU GRADE #2, STRUCTURAL LIGHT FRAMINGo 0 8. WHERE RAISED MEDIAN OR TYPE C CURBING RULE #16, PARAGRAPH 124-C, SELECTED FOR STRAIGHTNESS, AND FREE ft F 3 YELLOW LINE IS USED, USE TYPE 2WR RPMS, WITH RED OF HEART CENTER (FOHC) WOOD TO RESIST TWISTING. SEE NOTE 6 FACING OPPOSITE THE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC. 3) PRESSURE TREATED POSTS SHALL BE TREATED WITH A 4-1/2% TO TOP OF CLEAT 5-1/275 HEAVY PETROLEUM SOLVENT PENTACHLOROPHENOL SOLUTION IN V�*%�TYP E 2Y R P M (TYP) <* ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO SEE NOTE 7 DESIGNATION M133. WITH A MINIMUM NET RETENTION OF THE DRY SALT OF 1/2 POUND PER CUBIC FOOT OF WOOD. C LEAT 4) POSTS SHALL BE 4 ## x 4", WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 12 FEET. (2) 0.156" 0 NAIL HOLES DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC LONGER POSTS MAY BE NEEDED TO MAINTAIN 8.-FEET OF VERTICAL POST (PUNCHED OR DRILLED) CLEARANCE ABOVE WALKING AREAS. POSTS SHALL BE 14 FEET IF TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE SAME POST. DOTTED EXTENSION LINE (WDEL, YDEL) LEGEND: 5) BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED AT SEVERAL LAYERS TO MINIMIZE <)0 MONO -DIRECTIONAL RPM TYPE 2 SETTLING. NTS 65) ALL POSTS SHALL BE 2-WAY PLUMB. ... . . ...... ............ 2 4" LINE YELLOW OR WHITE PER E31-DIRECTIONAL RPM TYPE 2 \V C LEATS - LANS. SEE NOTE 6 4bV 2014 1) At I. POSTS SHALL BE FITTED WITH AN ALUMINUM CLEAT AS SHOWN TO PREVENT SIGNPOST ROTATION AND/OR UNAUT110twrt) MONO, ------ - 10 1 N POS"I' I �EMOVA L., . .... .. ... DWG. NO. 2) OE ALUMINUM ALLOY, 6061 -1-6. CHEMICAI 1-Y COATED IN A(`,('ORDANCF WITH ASTM 8449-67 CLASS 2. PUBL"'Ic YAY/44VV WORKS If J( IR.- H RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS 347 0[` 0". NAIL HOL[_') C*I,fAf1,,3 f`3[,, 30 INCHES LONG, 3 INCHES WIDE, THICKNESS OF 0.08, WIT1­1 A 2-INCH TURNOUT OF !q I'll 11,111 I'll "Oslo 1,111111,111pill 11 0.156 INCI-]E-S DIAM1,7 I J`,,. R S I `IALL. BE PUNCHED OR DRILLED IN THE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN. 4) POSITION CLEAT TURN -OUT AWAY­-I`T�OM AND EVEN -WITH THE BOTTOM OF THE POST. JULY 20 14 . ........... . . IN 1 11 am W PUDLIC SIGN POST IDWG. NO. [ [';"�01 0 �- I F M�� � Aft;, WORKS 3=51 I IN 1110 11 111, 1 1 NI'S NTS fto All V KI P RAISED PAVEMBIN'T MARI(ERS' SIGINN O&OST . ..... ..... ....... . . . 500 500 500 .... ... ...... 500 ........... PVI' STA� 10+63.62' C L 'S' CL,S: ... PVI ELEV-486.52 30OTH ST... ROW .300TH,ST .... K: 14.45 ROW, LVC 20.00 PVI STA-.10+92 50­ ... 00 CN 'N PVI� STA: 11+08.34 495 PVI ELEV.'4'81.:77 ....... ......... 495 495 (10 495 PVI ELEV-.482.05 --------------- PO r :F ...... ...... _)00 EXISTING. r*.-,00 K-.3.25 LVC-*30.00 + GRADE LVC-30.00 UJ U�) Lo ..V W P10 U') 'M 000 + 11�f + > ::N 00 M, moo QO QO QO ........... + + 4W% ............ 00 00 6 V) > 00. 0 > V) M 6j, M� �M. 0 MOUNTABLE MOUNTABLE 6j� TRAFFIC: CIRCLE .... TRAFFIC' CIRCLE' 480 �J* .... ... ............. 480 485 ... EXISTING.' 0.-0 485 ...... ....... ...... ...... ........ ....... ............. .......... ------------------- GRADE 0'38% Z:== FINISHED FINISHED ....... I ,437o' 016 %: -1-67% 'GRADE .... ORM 480 480 480 ...... ............ ........... ...... ...... ........ .......... ............ ...... ...... ... .... ... .......... . ..... .. ........ ...... ...... ...... .............. ..... .... ........ ... .... .. N - 06 0 ...... Q 44.- (6' o�) Lo . 1� co CD C) .0 0� 00, .... C\I C-0 ...... 00 LO ...... 11Z11-- LO ....... 1"(") W J­ 00 00 (-b (0 . . . . . C�l n . . . . I . . I . I., I I I I � � �* . . 1, . . . I . . .1 . . . I . . . I I I % . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. T'7 . , . . V . . . . . . . .. �7_ cx") (r) 00 00 CIO co . . . Q0 LO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . (YD 00, . . . . 00 W 00 00 00 00 on 00 OC) ()0 00 00 00 00 00 00 . . . . . . . 00 00 . . . . . . . 00 00 00 . . . . . . . 00 00 . . . . . . . . . - Nt . . . Vj Nt, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 't . . . . . 0 u 0 . . . . . . . . . . . Q . . . . . . 0 LLJ 0 0. 0 0 ....... 0 LL 0 0 . ....... LLJ Ljj LLJ Lj_ Lj_ Lj_j LI_ LLj Lj_ Lj_ LL] Li- LIJ Lj_ LIJ.10 LL_ . . . . . . . ........ .... .... ....... ............. ........ ......... ...... ............................ ............. ........ ...... .............. ........... ..... .. ......... ....... ........... ......... ....... On 10+40 11+00 12+0012+10 10+30 11+00 '012+00 I if 1 $f =201 H; 1$1=51 V 1 =20' H; 1"=5' V as F � IA[j INK MTH A"T D R" I V` E W A PRO'FILE = 24TH" `L UKIVEWAY P`Fk0FILEw 2 V 18" STOP LINE I CROSSWALK STRIPE DETAIL TRAFFIC ARROWS TYPE 1S, 2SL, 2SR, 3SL,, 3SR, 4S, AND 5S - SEE WSDOT STANDARD PLAN M-24.40 "SHARKS TOOTH" YIELD LINE SYMBOL SEE WSDOT STANDARD PLAN M-24.60 HANDICAPPED PARKING STALL SYMBOL SEE WSDOT STANDARD PLAN M-24.60 BIKE LANE SYMBOL - SEE WSDOT STANDARD PLAN M-9.50 PREFERENTIAL LANE SYMBOL - SEE WSDOT STANDARD PLAN M-7.50 II I I � 11111111111 Jill 11 ii 1111 MOO Ill WORKS ­j­"­1 "I'll ­111­ PAVEMENT MAR Centerline Curb Ramp DWG. NO 31=21 NTS &I U1 I E M E T M A R'K 111 u"S MIS(ClLLAINE'01"U'S PAIY N NTS 10 T U S"' E D PERMi 01 NO. XX-XXXXXX-XX APPROVED DATE U LA ND USUPERMIT S` OBMI L = RmESUSMI TAL 4W 4M 'A J Date: 04/15/2019 Job No..- 2 7 Drawn By: CRL Checked by* SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019, ADDENDUM 03 Z�L 6/21/492019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 Fr=% do% A '00% 1 11 1 1 ff I up M%j1,4T/-x E Ill 19% %.- - LP" J*' E TI-Ax, I L 00"" TRANSITION SIDEWALK U 1 N Q�-_5 S 3 OT'N' FL 480.51 STA 12+70.11 25.89' RT to 5.0 46-99' LT SAVE AND RANSITION SAVE AND PROTECT FL 480.57 PROTECT EX POLE SIDEWALK Q�5 CN BARRIER CURB REMAIN 1BARRIER CURB M. 6 C CZ�506 C�Z5 11-011, MINE NINE MEN DETECTABLE 480.67 WARNING DETECTABLE 481.06 M.E. +478.7 SURFACE CZ5 0% j," z C,-: :llO 6 to 0 SAVE AND PROTECT 00 FL 480.47 V Z., /- YT., 2.617o L, 0 0 U EX SIGNPOST TO )U 10, 480.77 44'y REMAIN to .00 000 41.99 CD -7 ^7 U) Cj) FL 480.67 0 T8070 6.4 Owns, 482.36 CL 480.61 STA 1 +35.11. 46.15 "M Fw-m LT FL 480.32 0 URFACE SAVE AND Oliva FL 478.48 FL 479.18 C 481.77 182.61 PROTECT EX LIGHT .00, 41-15 LT Owns, FL 480.51 TRANSITION SIDEWALK Fm-m 09 Will r6 TRANSITION SIDEWALK WIN TA 12 3.120 LT --------------- FL 484.13 7.0 I'M MEN WE M-11 484 484.76 VJ nil S 300TH ST 1 f =5) 1 =5f S 30OT'N ST A $1 9-1 1 =51 I tip R AM mF RAM S 300TIM, ST RAMP RAmr S 300TH ST S 300TH ST 481.60 FL 479.06 CD STA 12+35.03. 41.00' RT U) 11 STA .1 2+10.03J. 16.00 RT W 11-1- 4bl.94 -ALA STA 11 +97.)31 1, 79.43 > vlj 480.96 to 1010007 5.0 to STA 12+35.034 46.00) RT 11,qt 00 482.32 SURFACE k1k 06 CN BARRIER CURB $ 4791.10U NZ CN C,�: 5 0 C; �llO 6 -1 "fmmmommu .9 6 DETECTABLE NOT USED SURFACE LIM, BARRIER CURB P E RM 11" N 0, XX-XXXXXX-XX 481.93 APPROVED 2*2 6 - T RAMP R AM NUT sun SEE) DATE L I VA LAND u t rt:RMIT SUBMI L RESU0290'4MITTA m m�- 4P 4m Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: ----'---------'--------- 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by- SBP Revisions # Date Description 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT Zj, K (0) -N- A RAMP U'ETAIL'Ill. � ���� 6 w��0/�����0�� IN S 300TH ST 6 TRANSITION C-50,6 SIDEWALK �,j M.E. +481.1 TRANSITION 6 0 LT STA 16+27.103 52.74 MIE. +481.0 481-08 SA.VE-..,AND PROTECT SIDEWALK �Z%-506 /-24 LF BARRIER CURB TC 480.90 EX SIGNPOST TO DETECTABLE 4,9' 1 1 f FL 480.40 REMAIN i i QZ,506 C�7506 WARNING � 6 1 7,0 M.E. +481.0 .480. SURFACE Q:Z.506 00 +481.1 5.0p M.E. +476.3 5.o 2.6% 476.86 On- 1.80% t-Z 478.481 7.71 477.43 re C:) 27 LF BARRIER CURB STA 16+55.7 51.83' LT -4* -.-4- 481.29 1�1 15-40% ---,6.89. 3.0p STA 16+91.73,16.00' RT TC 481.20 18, 18.0,v,,, C CO 5. 0, TC 477.26 0-4 10 1%, P.-I. FL 480.70 C�Z5 1 % FL 476.76 �O 6 C�Z 5 ila C. ,�O 6 C) C) CIO * m tsl*�' �00 * Cl) LO 0()0 SAVE AND PROTECT 0 STA 480.63 EX SIGNPOST TO LSTA 16+6357, 25.06' LT 4. 0' 3 FL 477.60 STA 16+55.87, 44.84' LT 3 .5 t REMAIN FL 480.72 TC 480.99 15. 8% STA 16 + 81.7 00 FL 480.49 FL 478.35 SAVE AND PROTECT EX LIGHT STA 16+26. 5,51 480.82 STA 16+ou.zlzll, 10. 00 4.4 6' LT (16,01 0% DETECTABLE FL 478.38 POLE TO REMAIN 0 Q- Cj) 0 0 U WARNING C�Z 5�O 6 04 16+85.99 18.11 () () Q FL 480.53 00 4 + SURFACE Sk W FL 477.61 FSTA 16+61.31. 26.58' RT DETECTAE�LE 1� >0 C CD val TC 481.78 -5C6 WARNIN u 00 STA 16+89.9 3. 18.13' LT ------- L450.85 STA 16+56.1 D 4) LT 0)00 FL 481.28 SUR E STA 16+25.77, 39.58 LT 39.8 21 LF TC 477.34 N 6.78% 480.86 ",J 6.84 FL 480.76 Q) �,) �- , FL 480.75 BARRI'ER CURB r2 + 9 2.9 9, 18.14' 6-,Z�5 O� C Z 5 0 6 2 STA 16 LT fil Cq TC 476.77 01 All. I A FL 476.27 00 U-) C) Ltll�j C) 00 NOP 00 C) TRANSITION 0 cr '00 6 /N CN �5O�6 S I D E WALK q 4 8.50 477.76 483.00 IN '477.43 a 5.0 5.0 Na"I 481.33 -T- SIDEWALK STA 16+59.9'4 29.44' LT TRANSITION 483.79 DETECTABLE-7-J A 400 TC 481.24 TO WARNING IA, SURFACE "o. t5l FL 480.74 Q �5O 6 'Ile b-506 26 LF M.E. +484. ------------- 4\ BARRIER CURB 481.08 Al 10 6 481.92 Q,-506 C�,-�06 401\ STA 16+14.793 24.47' LT FW= TC 482.91 CIA FL 482.41 16+09,00� 21#241 Lf TC 483.70 S 300Ttalm ST Fl. 483.20 S 300TH S I M.E. + 1 =51 5f 1 it =5) 1 =5� S 30OTril ST RAMr^ RAmp RAMP RAMr . . .. . ...... . . ..... ........ . .... ..... . ...... . ..... . ...... . .. . .... . S 300Trlll ST S 300THIll ST 481.92 %\ STA 16+58.481 31.82) RT, ;6 STA 16+24.66, 31.0 4' RT 493.57 TC 482.20 TC 483.06 op 5.0 lo 483.20 FL 482.56 FL 481.70 NE, 1.80% �C) I W 10 482.34 Ilk 00 co 493. 0 \N 5.0 STA 16+56.73. 41.00' RT STA 16+26.73 41 00' RT PROTECT EX UfIL TO I IN FL 483.00 REMAIN FL 482.36 ' \ I \/-\� PROTECT EX UTIL TO 7*6 6 T !m mgg 0% ADJUST PEDESTRIAN" REMAIN 00 la" CURB IF NECESSARY, lek 83.14 ADJUST PEDESTRIAN 49,). 3. 482.50 N� , ''� ( I k-) kj #� #% 0 k"', &P, a TO AVOID UTIL CURB!IF NECESSARY co C, C- J9 k, 4R.-I L6 m 0 -- - 0 C) TO AVOID UTIL STA 16+56.73, 46.00) RT STA 16+26.73, 46.00' RT 1.80% C) C�o 0 (D FL 4 22.61 00 7-5 DETECTABLE �7.5) 0 C FL 483.25 WARNING 1"' 6 D E TAB E e-11", 1, 11 LF 4-8,3 1.807o W C 10 LF Q�Z�0 6 VRNING 1, 0% SURFACE Z:�O 6 PEDESTRIAN C) C) �O I C��07 PEDESTRIAN STFACE 483.39 0o 0 CURB W 481.75 CURB -1 1 1 0) '- 00 ------- STA 10+41.06, 14.87' LT 3: 7 LF LT F=m ARRIER URB TC 493.67 STA 10+46.062 14.02' LT TC 493.50 FL 493.17 C\j FL 49 3. 00 # Cq C-506 C7506 27 LF DETECTABLE BARRIER CURB QZ,-�O 7 WARNING SURFACE C�Z5 484 �O 6 C,�: �O 6 STA 16+56.73 1.00' RT TC 484.6 1--, of FL 484.11 ----5TA 16+26.733 61.0 RT lb, 7,0) 7,01 TC 485.25 1.80% �\484.74 485.3 8 1.80% FL 484.75 N NOT u.)ED S 302ND PL` PERMIT NO, XX-XXXXXX-XX 1 t) =51 1 it =5f APPROVED ft RN%'A M r RAMP . I NUT USED` DATE CURB 2 6 9 LAND ubh/PhRMIT SUBMITi L =R E !*iumm B M I i - - -mum A, L It 1 6 / 2 1A / 2 0 19 Ljj 1.4. 00 C.) m Cr. 00,- 0) Z) co cli LW UJ CD < W Cn x u- 41:Z. CDco co ui A& W Ce z -j ummomw < uj mZ 0 -.lffxmml� F- :3 0 LLI -i LLJ F- W, Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by-, SBP Revisions # Date Description ADDENDUM 03 z 4/15/2019 LU/PERMIT 6/21/2019, zi� RESUBMITTAL #1 Fraft 10"�& a A t*% r1m KUNTAk.:)c rlw% mmuftk A KAM fj D' ETA I L A 4, �A 1. PROOF OF LIABILITY INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO 1. PROOF OF LIABILITY INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO THE 1. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN 15. WHERE STRAW MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE APPLIED PRE- CONSTRUCTION MEETING. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN (I.E. SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, AT A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF TWO INCHES. 2. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL WAY REVISED CODE (FWRC), 2. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION IN PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES UTILITIES, ETC.). 16. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROVIDING SIGNIFICANT TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED PER APPLICABLE ORDINANCES, AND THE CITY COUNCIL CONDITIONS OF PROJECT APPROVAL. THESE ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT 7-08.3(l). THIS SHALL INCLUDE LEVELING AND COMPACTING THE 2. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE 'CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, SECTION 19.120 OF FWRC. DOCUMENTS ARE SUPPLEMENTED BY THE MOST RECENT VERSION OF THE STANDARD TRENCH BOTTOM, THE TOP OF FOUNDATION MATERIAL, AND REQUIRED PIPE BEDDING, TO A SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION (WSDOT/APWA), THE KING UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE PIPE IS SUPPORTED BY A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS (KCRS), AND THE KING COUNTY SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL BASE. APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED. (KCSWDM). IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE PROFESSIONAL 3. STEEL PIPE SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER INSIDE AND 3. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED ENGINEER TO CORRECT ANY ERROR, OMISSION, OR VARIATION FROM THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS OUTSIDE. IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE FOUND IN THESE PLANS. ALL CORRECTIONS SHALL BE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OR LIABILITY TO BEYOND THE FLAGGED CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE FLAGGING SHALL BE THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, SUCH AS CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES, NOT LOCATED WITHIN A MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE DESIGN ELEMENTS I WITHIN THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL TRAVELED ROADWAY OR SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. ALL DRAINAGE 4. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL WAY ENGINEERING REVIEW CHECKLIST. SOME ELEMENTS MAY HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED OR STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH A PERMANENT RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SHALL HAVE SOLID CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES, AND IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT MISSED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEWER. ANY VARIANCE FROM ADOPTED STANDARDS LOCKING LIDS. LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR VIOLATE APPLICABLE WATER IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, PRIOR TO 5. ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL CONFORM TO CFW DRAWING NUMBERS 4-1, 4-2t 4-3, 4-4p STANDARDS. CONSTRUCTION. 4-51 4-8 OR 4-10. 5. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED 4. APPROVAL OF THIS ROAD, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT'CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL 6. ALL DRIVEWAY CULVERTS LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE OF ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION (I.E. DOMESTIC WATER CONVEYANCE, SEWER CONVEYANCE, GAS, TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM ll SLOPE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DRIVEWAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE UPGRADED (I.E. ADDITIONAL SUMPS, RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES, ETC.) AS ELECTRICITY, ETC.) DITCH. CULVERTS SHALL HAVE BEVELED END SECTIONS TO MATCH THE SIDE SLOPES. NEEDED FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS. 5. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY, A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE 7. ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF DITCHES, CHANNELS AND SWALES, WHERE REQUIRED, MUST 6. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR AND HELD BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, THE APPLICANT, AND THE APPLICANT)S BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK, PLACED TO A DEPTH OF ONE FOOT AND MUST MEET THE MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 4"-8" ROCK/40%-70%PASSING, 21)-4f' ROCK/30%-40% PASSING; CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE, 7. A Y l'� lk S P /LGETATION, INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS, WHERE NO FURTHER AND -2" ROCK/10%-20% PASSING. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS 6. A SIGNED COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER DRAWING NUMBER 7-024 OR AS AMENDED BY THE APPROVED PLANS. RECYCLED ASPHALT OR WORK IS ANTICIPATED OR A PERIOD OF 2 DAYS (WET SEASON) OR 7 DAYS (DRY SEASON), CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. CONCRETE RUBBLE SHALL NOT BE USED. SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH THE APPROVED ESC METHODS (I.E. SEEDING, MULCHING, 7. ON-SITL CONSTRUCTION NOISE SHALL BE LIMITED AS PER FWRC (SECTION 19.105.040). 8. LOTS NOT APPROVED FOR INFILTRATION SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH DRAINAGE OUTLETS NETTING, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.) f NORMALLY THIS IS 701.00A.M. TO 8-400 P.M., MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, AND 9:00 A.M. TO 8:00 (STUB -OUTS). STUB -OUTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING: 8. ANY AREA NEEDING ESC MEASURES, NOT REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION, SHALL BE P.M. ON SATURDAYS. A. EACH OUTLET SHALL BE SUITABLY LOCATED AT THE LOWEST ELEVATION ON THE LOTt SO ADDRESSED WITHIN 15 DAYS. 8. RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSTRUCTION IS ALLOWED 8:30 A.M. TO 3:00 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. AS TO SERVICE ALL FUTURE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS, DRIVEWAYS, YARD 9. THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION TO WORK OUTSIDE OF THESE HOURS MUST BE GRANTED BY THE PUBLIC DRAINS, AND ANY OTHER SURFACE OR SUB -SURFACE DRAINS NECESSARY TO RENDER THE ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN THE 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT, WORKS DIRECTOR. LOTS SUITABLE FOR THEIR INTENDED USE. EACH OUTLET SHALL HAVE FREE -FLOWING, 10. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN ONE FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN A 9. IT SHALL BE THE APPLICANT) S/CONTRACTO R 0 S RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO AN APPROVED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OR TO AN CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO EASEMENTS NECESSARY BEFORE INITIATING OFF -SITE WORK WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, APPROVED OUTFALL LOCATION. PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER INTO THE B. OUTLETS ON EACH LOT SHALL BE LOCATED WITH A FIVE-FOOT HIGH, 2 X 4 STAKE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. 10. FRANCHISED UTILITIES OF OTHER INSTALLATIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THESE APPROVED MARKED "STORM". THE STUB -OUT SHALL EXTEND ABOVE SURFACE LEVEL, BE VISIBLE AND 11. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND WASH PADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING PLANS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNLESS AN APPROVED SET OF PLANS THAT MEET ALL CITY BE SECURED TO THE STAKE. REQUIREMENTS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF KCRS CHAPTER 8 ARE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF C. PIPE MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO UNDERDRAIN SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIBED IN KCRS 7.03 OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL FEDERAL WAY AT LEAST THREE DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AND, IF NON-METALLIC, THE PIPE SHALL CONTAIN WIRE OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE DETENTION. MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE 11. VERTICAL DATUM SHALL BE KCAS OR NGVD-29. D. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE REQUIRED FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS DEIGNED TO CONVEY FLOWS DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 12. GROUNDWATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE WITHIN A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR APPROPRIATE THROUGH INDIVIDUAL LOTS, 12. WET SEASON REQUIREMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN APPENDIX D, SECTION D.2.4.2 OF THE KCSWDM DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, BUT NOT UNDERNEATH THE ROADWAY SECTION. ALL GROUNDWATER E. THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE LOCATIONS OF ALL ARE IN EFFECT BEGINNING OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30. STUB -OUT CONVEYANCE LINES WITH RESPECT TO THE UTILITIES (I.E. POWER, GAS, LA SYSTEMS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WSDOT/APWA STANDARD TELEPHONE, TELEVISION). 3. A Y mANENT RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN SHALL SPECIFICATIONS. F. ALL INDIVIDUAL STUB -OUTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE LOT BE MODIFIED WITH THE NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND SHALL PROVIDE 13. ALL UTILITY TRENCHES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE BACKFILLED 5/8"CRUSHED ROCK AND HOMEOWNER. ADEQUATE STORAGE CAPACITY. IF THE PERMANENT FACILITY IS TO FUNCTION ULTIMATELY AS AN COMPACTED TO 95%DENSITY. WHEN TRENCH WIDTH IS 18 INCHES OR LESS, AND IS WITHIN THE G. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW TAP --IN OR CU"L-IN TEES ON MAINS FOR INDIVIDUAL LOT INFILTRATION OR DISPERSION SYSTEM, THE FACILITY SHALL NOT BE USED AS A TEMPORARY DRAINAGE. SETTLING BASIN. NO UNDERGROUND DETENTION TANKS OR VAULTS SHALL BE USED AS A TRAVELED WAY, TRENCH WILL BE BACKFILLED WITId CONTROL DENSITY FILL (SELF -COMPACTED TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN. FLOWABLE FILL) AS DEFINED BY WSDOT 2-09.3(1)E. THE AGGREGATE WILL BE 3/8-INCH MINUS. 14. WHERE SEEDING FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED, FAST GERMINATING GRASSES 14. ALL ROADWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO 95% DENSITY IN SHALL,IBE APPLIED AT AN APPROPRIATE RATE (I.E. ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL RYE APPLIED AT ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT 2-06.3. APPROXIMATELY 80 POUNDS PER ACRE). 15. OPEN CUTTING OF EXISTING ROADWAYS IS NOT ALLOWED UNLESS SPECIFICALLY APPROVED BY NTS THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND NOTED ON THESE APPROVED PLANS. ANY OPEN CUT SHALL NTS BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS 8.03(B) 3. DRAINAGE NOTES Z EROSI DII E' "TATI A041 1� 110 N V IS 0 ill`�A N UN UDN 16o THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE SAFEG(JARDS, SAFETY DEVICES, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, FLAGGERS, AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT STREET LIGHTING NOTES LIFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC, AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY WORK WITHIN TIdE TRAVELED RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT MAY INTERRUPT NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL REQUIRE AT LEAST ONE 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACQUIRE AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT FROM THE CITY'S BUILDING FLAGGER FOR EACH LANE OF TRAFFIC AFFECTED. ALL SECTIONS OF THE WSDOT STANDARD DEPARTMENT. THE ELECTRICAL PERMIT SHALL BE KEPT IN THE UPPER BAY OF THE SERVICE SPECIFICATIONS 1-07.23 CAL'31NE"T. - TRAFFIC CONTROL, SHALL APPLY. 2. (.0"ON (0*0MPI,_,,FTION OF UNDERGROUND OF POWER FROM POWER VAULT OR POLE 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL ALL, �,,�EG,,I_JLATORY AND WARNING SIGINS Pf",T? THE TO SEf"VlC['_ CABINET, CONTRACTOI`,'� NO'TIFY THF BUILDING DEPARTMENT, UPON FINAL LATEST EDITION OF MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFiC CONTROL DEVJ(,',*,'ES. ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPROVAL., "T'IdE ELECTRICAL INSI"ECTOR WILI.,. Pl.,ACE AN APPRO"VAL T G NEXT 18. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINAL GRADE AFTER PAVING ASPHALT WEARING COURSE. TO THE METER BASE SO THAT ELECTRICAL SERVICE CAN BE AUTI­10RIZED. 19. ROCKERIES ARE CONSIDERED TO BE A METHOD OF BANK STABILIZATION AND EROSION ONLY. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE POWER SOURCE AND SERVICE LOCATION WITH THE UTILITY ROCKERIES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED TO SERVE AS RETAINING WALLS. ALL ROCKERIES COMPANY, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFW DRAWING NUMBERS 3-22, 3-23. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER ROCKERIES MAY NOT EXCEED SIX FEET IN HEIGHT FOR CUT SECTIONS OR FOUR FEET IN HEIGHT (1-800-424-5555) AT LEAST 3 DAYS BEFORE DIGGING. FOR FILL SECTIONS UNLESS DESIGNED BY A GEOTECHNICAL OR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LICENSED 5. FIELD ADJUST POLE BASES TO BE LEVEL WITH SIDEWALK SURFACE (SEE CITY STANDARD IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. DRAWINGS 3-39A AND 3-43). 6o LOCATE LIGHT POLES SO THAT THE POLE IS A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) FEET BEHIND THE FACE OF CURB, AND THE LUMINAIRE EXTENDS TWO (2) FEET BEYOND THE FACE OF CURB. LIGHT POLES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SIDEWALK. POLE BASES MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN THE SIDEWALK ONLY WITH CITY APPROVAL. 7. JUNCTION BOXES SHALL BE LOCATED BEHIND THE SIDEWALK, AND WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF THE POLE. 8. CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC UNDER ALL STREET AND DRIVEWAY CROSSINGS. SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT IS ACCEPTABLE UNDER LANDSCAPED AREAS. 90 IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION OF THE STREET LIGHT SYSTEM BY KING COUNTY, ALL STREET LIGHT SYSTEM J-BOXES SHALL BE SPOT WELDED SHUT USING A 1"WELD ON OPPOSITE CORNERS. NTS GENERAL NOTES NTS STREET LIGHTING NOTES NTS NOT USED 7 NTS NOT USED PERMIT NO, XX=xxxxxx-xx DATE LAND USE/PERMIT SUBMITTAL = RESUBMITTAL #1 uj Cr. 00 Cn C14 Am W F_ < uj x Ct U- C) W CV) 00 "04 F_ LU Lu W z 7, ui z 0 F-:C D C)- 0 C/) uj W 28977 4 is T L "'7 7 um Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By-, CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019, ADDENDUM 03 z�L 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 r-% 0-%, 2, 1 t"% r" MUN Atzim NOTES ... . . . . 77" "a, 4 A ... ... 4 4 4 L, "M ,r .+' df . J "" fr •° ,, .r a ,r .e" / v' ✓ ,r ,,"' ..+' .+"�.J d. ,�,* �,t 77,1111171 77, XING IYY E 487.49 (6 S D) .40 TP 485.70 (6 SD) 'v 40 40mm ML m ago= mom,ft =now"' so 4mom mum ab MEW 4mmum 40 400M 4mum so 4mmm GOMM 40 quo= 4mmm 40 Mum IMINI�ill 40 MIN= 4mmom 40 4NEW GONE= Gomm Gomm 40 4mism 4milow am= amm ­40 amm am= MATC'm"'LlN mm SEE S'ri'EE Cm=01603 4a* I ldllmlmm�l I I Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: C R L Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description z 4/15/2019, ADDENDUM 03 Z 6/21/2019U/PERMITL L RESUBMITTAL #1 I� EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION 7800" EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE 44 ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT 7- GRAVEL SURFACING 77 7 7 7 SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER ep 14, 41 PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE 'ns FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETENTION FACILITY STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT L_u SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION ----------- 4 'k G. rT_ tt, A 4 NWA =73 MIA=!i+„ .; � w z+. S Sri k.�==6v^ PROPERTY N _ry LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR 'PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR smom— mm FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING 4 4, CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0 0 0 A 0 12 0 0 0 0 0<0 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT 7 (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING 7 SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER 11, 01, PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN Pj DETENTION FACILITY STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT ww SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER uo- WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE A FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION F.11:1:1 601,14 *q 00 VI ce) 0o LIJ LIJ LL LLJ ce) 00 (N Lu CD Lu — to W C%j z LIJ Z 0 D CL 0 a) I- W V_ V- • 77, 7,1 770 Y. Li Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: BP Revisions Date Description Z3� 4/15/2019DDENDUM 03 A Z L2\, 6/21 /2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 100 .............. PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR FF 780W FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING 4 4 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H EAVY DUTY _rY CONCRETE 4114 0 0 0 4- ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT 0 "Ira (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL CURB AND GUTTER 'IV 1p 41 41 Nt, 141 NV PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 ........ STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DQ Gl yJ DETENTION FACILITY S "Y STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH _BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS W ---- -- - WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION APPROVED 1%t 00 co 0) CY) 00 Cj (0 UJ to C> C-4 ui U) U- C) Lu col) V- ce) 00 C*4 to Lij 04 z < LU Z 0 0 VA W v- P t. r. yF Date. 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: BP Revisions # Date Description z 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 ZL2\, 6/21/2019 LU/PERM IT RESUBMITTAL #1 mllff"110, R�00 mom I A moo" M AATCll 1 SOMME1L NMOMM SH 1,11 XING C-603 C-604 KEY MAP LAND . ..... EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR Fgrm"- 78.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0 0 0 0 0 a ko HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT 6 0 o 0 k:, 0 0 0, 0 a (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETENTION FACILITY STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT Lu SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH B-OLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS owl WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT -----------FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION A., AA—/\AAAVAx/X,-XX Pwft E R& vvv% d 00 C> IV- CVI) 00, 0,> Cf) co N flo UJ -1 W U) C:> U- C) W m 00 W W C14 W z 0 3: © C/) W _j W Date: 04/15/2019 Job Now; 21739 Drawn BY: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description' 419 Z /15/20 , ADDENDUM 03 6/21/,2019 LU/PERM IT Z�2 RESUBMITTAL #1 CROSSINGS A2 APPROVED ` . C-604 DATE C \ USEIPERMITSUBMITTAL•RESUBMITTAL#1 `---�--------°� ,110, A /,9111 0 _A 9 Im a- 6/z 1 2 1 SITE AND BUILDINGMATCHLINE SEE SHEET L101 =I Milo Im low owl TOTAL LOT AREA: 9.38 ACRES I ,I, PROPOSED OAR PARKING SPACES: 60 STALLS INCLUDING ACCESSIBLE STALLS (1 VAN PARKING STALL) i ACCESSIBLE PASSENGER LOADING°,i 485 U E LENGTH 1 OO -- 4.8 ? ACCESSIBLE PASSENGER LOADING REQUIRED •� ts, � � � , � ._ � � IIze 6 I� 9 ;�;^ �N�Y�-�Ar��, ���M 4 X 2CJ - 80 LF j i J PROPOSED BUILDING AREA. LEVEL 1. 58,�786 SF ? 4$j LEVEL . 4,919 S F , x s" TOTAL. 61 , 705 SF f , q � �k ;Sid � RRR t' (A."31 A T E S&C' HE E D' NUN L E t��r TYPE GT1' DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ,} � a VEHICULAR PIPE GATE 34' WIDE DOUBLE LEAF, SEE DETAILS A ' p}! (2�, WITH KNOX PAD LOCK WITH(2)HOLD OPEN POSTS1 I, VEHICULAR CHAIN LINK ABLE LEAF. 1 C� HT., 2C� WIDE DOUBLE ' SEE DETAILS � � � � 7 r �• � i M. , ,� } �, � � 3 Y� r,� �� l�ppX e�< p 1 DOUBLE SWING GATE BLACK VINYL WITH MESH L403 n WITH KNOX PAD LOCK q VEHICULAR CHAIN LINK ,. 1 CJ HT,, 8 WIDE, DOUBLE LEAF, SEE. DETAIL s � '' ''4 •', , { ' tt}y � 1 ;' SS) � dd?j*dsj, 5 (1) DOUBLE SWING GATE BLACK VINYL WITH MESH L40 WITH KNOX PAD LOCK 3 y C r ptl N INK 4(2)PEDESTRIAN CHAIN L ,'� WIDE SINGLE LEAF HT. , gg SEE DETAIL. t � r I/j pr„f SWING GATE BLACK VINYL WITH 2 MESH L4Q3 , n WITH PANIC HARDWARE •� a t ! } � 1 1 $ } ; ��4 �y. � � h�Gi'ut IN LINK PEDESTRIAN CHAIN r 4 HT. 3 WIDE SINGLE LEAF SEE DE TAIL :I `{ 5 SWING GATE , :g BLACK VINLY WITH 1 MESH o e � •� }} 444 iiii MM yi 1 1 � h "ITE IMPROVEMENTS LEGEND Y ; , y r t ti 0 �h ITEMSYMBOL - •.,x.w„ „u, ---------- - ,, ,, ,,,,,,, fie .., . ADDITIONAL IN1 C,1MA II,N A I a ' '4. �` j � ., 1 ✓ ' : '` �"`s ` ,4' i �' � ➢, r , � � � y y � �� � , } � FLAG POLEWA SF'CTION 2 3 I 1 ;➢ � � � � �, �� 14, BIKE RACK SECTION 52 � a 00 lTill f, s=, CONCRETE..... SEATWALL, L.40 TYP. WALL BALL C60-4#' �1_400)} .... � T L/ � EET A411 CIO= 0r+ }-4 �owas rn 4 V V) 0 V 2 �-- 000 0", kA q < < 3 Ljj 2 uj w ---� C31 mummmmmm Ln LAj Z Lu rr� 4A M Z Z 0 Revisions or. I i Description LAND USE / L'ADDENDUM • , • - J11-.-RESUBMITTAL LAND USE 1 * ------ ---------- �I* OIIII � I 2 0� �I UI9 I T E L A E 'N'' L AF R U"' E M E I T L103 . � . I I I , Is SITE AND BUILDING DATA., - TOTAL LOT AREA: 9.38 ACRES PROPOSED CAR PARKING SPACES: INCLUDING 3 ACCESSIBLE STALLS (1 VAN PARKING STALL) ACCESSIBLE PASSENGER LOADING 485 QUE LENGTH / 1 00 = 4.85 z 4 X 2 01 = 80 LF ACCESSIBLE PASSENGER LOADING REQUIRED PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: LEVEL 1-0 36,786 SF LEVEL . 2: 2 4,91 9 S F I �­ TOTAL: 61,705 SF . GATE SCHEDULE TYPE QTY DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION -----.- .._� 1_____�. 1 (2) VEHICULAR PIPE GATE 34' WIDE DOUBLE LEAF, SEE DETAILS ( A �( B'lllllllll1�/`l C'� WITH KNOX PAD LOCK WITH (2) HOLD OPEN POSTS ��!91�!V,��5 _" VEHICULAR CHAIN LINK 10' HT.$ 20' WIDE, DOUBLE LEAFt SEE DETAILS /'l c ,� ��� 2 (1) DOUBLE SWING GATE BLACK VINYL WITH 2" MESH 1\�� WITH KNOX PAD LOCK - ` VEHICULAR CHAIN LINK 10) HT.2 8$ WIDE, DOUBLE LEAF, SEE DETAIL /"""c -Illlllll� !.� 3 (1) DOUBLE SWING GATE BLACK VINYL WITH 2" MESH 1�!� WITH KNOX PAD LOCK 1___1 I ___1 4 (2) PEDESTRIAN CHAIN LINK 7' HT., 3'-6'$ WIDE, SINGLE LEAF, SEE DETAIL ( - D �Illlllll� SWING GATE BLACK VINYL WITH 2" MESH 1�!5 WITH PANIC HARDWARE PEDESTRIAN CHAIN LINK 4' HT.$ 3' WIDE, SINGLE LEAF, SEE DETAIL E 5 (2) SWING GATE BLACK VINLY WITH 1" MESH L403 .1111­1`_11___.._ ' 10�14 it" M E N T S"' L E (3 E N D SITE IMPRUVE ,---,,,,,-, _111--­ � ADDITIONAL IN11" ORMATION .,-,-",, SYMBOL _ ITEM ._'____ ***llllllllllll�* FLAG POLE SECTION 32 ,3 0 0 0 1419 BIKE RACKS SECTION 32 ,50 00 Z c) � _ 0 LITTER RECEPTACLE SECTION 32 I"') " 30 rll_�� CONCRETE SECTION 03 130 00 SEAT WALL 0 STONE SECTION 0,3 *­) 0 0 0 0,0 U __ X_ CHAIN LINK FENCE SECTION 32 ."51 1 �13 ­l_ - __* LIGHT POLE SEE ELECTRICAL 1---l- I I i ___.,�- .- I 11 I'll, I 11 , I I � : 1 I I CONCRETE PAVING I I, ,I ,,,,I I �, "I I 11 11 ­­_­6­_ ") 1 , ,5 :A I b " ., WITH TOOLED SCORE JOINTS SECTION ,","5', �) 01 �_ I � I :, . ", lf� � I I I 11 1?�, r.'' , AND EXPANSION JOINST A ; , , ___j � j I I /' \' , /'�'_'/','��'/'�"/"" "", I I I I , ,,; CONCRETE PAVING WITH I ,/ 11, *9 1 1), 1'�) "�,�/�',-,,-'�/�/ \'�,"/\":�/N"\ c ��;rl�11/ , -.,1.11,t�,�.?�7�� /�'71 SECTION 3,r %,�) I ,", �/, , --'-I �" ,1,11­11"'_,I� .�_�-,n�_: E FINISH, I/ , -1 //�,",\/\\_//�' //\- �`�.,\"/,`­ �, �11 /",_-/-�'-/­�'_ ,/-, 1, TOOLED SCORE JOINTS -I,,- , , -, , // - / �/�,�-'/N//��-/\//, _\ /", � \_ , \Itiv ,��-','/,:,,',' �_,�".�,/�,.,,, AND EXPANSION JOINTS I --­ 1- 7.­ ...... 1­1 11.1­11111111,__ _ _ ... ......... _ I I I I ­ ... _ � ... I .... � .... ''I'll I CR(JSI­,I[D ROCK SURFACING SECTION 32 30 30 "A", 'l.­1._­__111__­1._1__j 1111111,111111-- .... . .. I , I I, �, I " I 11 � I I , � 1, I 1'� ,,U I 6 EXISTING TREES , I _�,,_,_� '1`1 TO REMAIN I I I/ \1�1 "I", � " \, " ,',/ I/ �, , ,,,,��,,.,�,�,,�,,,��,�"1.1',�F I 6 )) ­_, 0. --- I - ­�;�'­ 1_111.) � ......... / '/",,�', I/, �_' _­_­� . I P, , G TREE � EXISTIN ( CRITICAL ROOT/NO DISTURBANCE ZONE \" ,,,/ AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE LINE \ %\ � � � ,��� ",,�, � I ,\ � I 1 41. __0 1:��, ' 11 \ � , , , \ j , "I 7�, "" , I , \� , , I '/ ��;, ��", 7 �� � , ,�,��/", /,11", ­" / ',\ ,',/ /,", � _/ '­ ""'N 11 __ �_, I I � - , ,I \1 1"' " __,/"\ 1 ) �, ___ _ / " """ 0 )/ 1, � i!/ f / . I I--,' � I / / t, I SECTION 01 I'A"3' ,"59 � I SECTION 01 56 39 ,� 1� I . � / 11\1 1'��,�. I k I '111k,,1 , " A to-* if 11 � ( .1"", \ �11, I I \ " MATutiLINE - THIS SHEET I ,.,,,I= , 1111�1 " M, m No No No ON No an - am, m go '�1111111 "1111111111111110, I "LINE - T r% r%1 I IN. I I �.,, / '�, MATCH Hilo SHEET . � A I ,, I k ,, 14 1, I ., I , , , `_� I\ I / / N I I , I �"`/ , ,,\ ..... �� \ \ , , ,,�,, �", � "I'll" I I I - � - ----4\-- '4 -----A ,�,', 11 I � "I, �, �� " �/"�/ ) I , � " , .\,,�,� , , ", \ T_ 117­� / : I ,,, , ,, �/""/ \ "" \ ',,>,��,/ " / 7 " " / 11 , -1 � , , , " , I I , � \\� , I ,,, ­� ,,� ,,,, "�t., 11 � 11 - , I �', "I / , , 11 �, � I , , \ \ ,A ( \ I I I , ", ,� � � I " , , , " I �, .A", , , �, I t 01 I'� 4 � _-, , �� , , "\ � I % < \ / I \ , "' " I \\1 I I , \ , , \ "' \ �, " _ � , " , , \f- %,". I \ <" ,; , �,,"" " , I 'IN , , I , ", , V, I I I I'll I \ � , " "N N I � I , " , , �,.-/ , / , , > _,� '5 , � � MOW ..L.''..�." � ., \ I . ­2_1 . .. ... 1, I .,�� 9 , I ,� ,�� � !� ,� 1"000 "I'll" 11 Im"l , W.- a.t I - 1� 00 - 110, 1,1011,1111"w" / '11�� I ,, t/ I -_ _7_ ---- _­� 0"" 1, � , ""'"'" , \ ", __7­ \ "I" 1/6 0 \ \lll ; , 1�­� I--" \ LAN/DSCAPE ,-�_ ___� `I� *1� -__ _.-� .1­1� -` 8 U FFE R �_ ___ _ . . . . I I . f I I � I - - - - - - wl . I ... I., ... I � . . I . 4e � ...... * , , , , , � I I . I � I . . � . . \ / " �`,,, P�' )i / � , - - � � - � � I . � � I , - , � - I � - I , I - . I I . I I I . . . � . / - /', � / .. � .... ... 1. I 01, �010�_ 1�_�, 11*l�:;;< _­ , I %, , '' . � I I . , , I ­ '' � , , , �1101� � I � � . ­ � . I � �1� / ­�_­ I ­ I V� ... �', I ­ I � ­ 1. I I �... ... I ­ � I 11 V� I I I '1'11�1­, ­ ­­ - � � � - 1.* _� I � V, 1-1�1-1�1�1�'- T, ' ' ' � - �­-`�� I I I � I � � I .... I , ­ I �, ill �� I .­ � . ..... � ... 11'11�41 . I . � . � _7______7 --- 1­­_���� . , . \ � � . . I I . , , � . _x ­1 ... 11 , _ .... � _ � I ­ ....... , I . I , . 1­1 , .\ . � %`�`.`*.`-11.1.1.`.1'. I - I ""."."", _ _ 11.,.,j'1'1'1*1 I I � . � '' I � � � ­ � I � . � I I . I � . I ... \­ ­ \ . . . . . � I'' '' 01 % I w � �� � " I I I I �,, \ ", I - I I � ­ I " I I � 4111 I % // /.. - �j, _� , , I 11 ## # I Ak ell I �, I I " ­ ,,, __ � 11 � _; I - - - - �___ ­..". w @ �. - 0- __ - I � � "I : I 11 " � 11 . � , !� I . I I , I - I - I . �,, I , I � I - - , 4 . . . . h , * , . I k11 � . . W. 7 I , . _11, � � . � I "" 11", �111 , I , ,,,,, . , I . ,.III I � I . , � . . � $1� 1 . I , , "I "I I ore N , , _,"_ �l, � � �/ / ,,,, / '' MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET L102 I . , � %, ,,'"lll�l . . . . . . jj��_ il-, I. I / / /11 , 1�11 ­13, '. I � . /, �' . " , / ji ",'!1�1� " 0 1 � I I ,'O�r . 1� , I , , t'' 17,11,�111�" It � _u_ 1� � *,I . I f", �, t� 1. � I j , _p_ i�ll "''I x 4�, I � 1,1,�,, ", � _; �, , I ­ I.. " �%, 'I, 1. � ("�1111 `4 , '' (11 - . . I , I � 1"t, - ,, , 4 .� �� I � I 1, �'�, -M IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IN I "�`,'� 1­1 '' t�, , "* ,�­ ,�_ I I I ,r,­, I I -, m NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11m., m "I I '.' � llj� ,4. � ­ - � 11 I ,'.� Ill I � 11 ��. � I _� I I � . NIP", �����l�����������������'i OW, , 10, m '. -M � ", " /`\1 � v i m I 11 11, I , , . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111"I!, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII AW IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII m 11 1­ " _ . 10 I 1b, I N , : I 1�`�­� :�,:*111­1111 , , % k 11� _11'111�'N,� 1 : I " ,,,,, '_,� ...... . . ,� �­,,'­­ , "' "' ''. I ", I l�,�l"-tl��,,z,�,����"",�u,����t,�,,�,,�",�"-",� 1­1 �� ,,, " � '' , , I � "b�,% � . I ]IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111111111111111111111.�,� �- I / 1, 114 1 r-­­­'5­­, I "' I � , � ��, ,, �IlC �, I , I I " �11'1 * A001, I � f_____L011_1_ � .1 I ...... . r. ,, - . 0 ii� - on". I It, � I . I �� .,^: ­ I .­ , "I ? I , , - EZ000. �" i lx�'! u,", i� , pir , � I ­ . , , " "I" . , � " 1. I . � I I I I I?` �00 ­1­1 � �, � � 1- I 0 : ,�, ,,,� t - 11. I . ", � I I 4 N , , , I '' � I " , 1_1 11, � I!. , � 11 � p � � 1111�. I I i ) � . 4� � � �11 .. 1� �1` I . � ll� L" 11� _,�,, A, t , ""Z�, , _1- � 1�11 I , . , , / "I � " 1 0404 � � . ,% � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �Ii�I 0606 ME (��, . - . :'�`_?,�:�:, "I'll'' � 1. .1114, 'll, , . . � " , I ­­ 11'11i�, �,';4, .1 " � ... m_ I � �­ ,,,�ee �11�` ,�� ­�� 11 N , � ., 1� I "I. . . I I ­ 01 INE - SEE SHEET t.. i , I., 1461 , 1- , . j " � I � I "" / / . , � I'', . , � " t .. ��11 . A, 111�1 , I 1­'. � � I � � I I-, ., /10 I ­1 I I -, . . � ­1 I __ - ,� � _�_ 4 ''. 'Ll, , . � I , � �,, � � ��` ell, 11 �� � 11, -NA, � ��,,, ,,�4 �, ­ t'� I", 10, 11 , " t,� �', � %� , "I , ''I, i . I , '11, 11,11 �, / " ". I �, � 5 ''i � � ., ­., '' �,-.,,�'�� 1, ,hl 11 , ,: *'� -.,Ol � 11 -I 4f / e�l '_ If 'I, '1_11/1' I ) 'i '' .1 ,11'1,tl""',�,'��11, , / /,' I 11 ., '', I .­j*_ . ,,,,,,,, ,,� \ 1, '' _ ____ I 1�1, 11 , 1�11'� " � ,r-�,, I I , . "I'll, , �", I " " ��,,,��, / te, " , j �""z �_�,J­' / I , , ��,,,,,, � "_0 , � - �0111 - ""' I x 0.01 I i. I ) , t_%', " I _ 1� � 11 ­1 �­` I - I . � , --T#I , - i ­1 I "I, ��,, , � . ��, � � � ­, I � � �1� I I k ,,�, 1%� : , I : � ... �, , ' I ,��el I . I" N� - I . I . � I �, . I ", � , , , I'll , I _ , "I, , , , 1, t, � ��4� - I �11l. �,/ " ATCHL _ "'P � "lill�, 1-� I , "I / , .i ,. "l 1, 111 / P�""-",�:�-,,�""-",�.",-"�7 � . I / \�\­,�:',_/ 1;11 'If �111,`Ij � I, _N�,�7 \ ,I 1'e, ,;,". - w, ­k�'i � 11 ­ �1 . � X, \ /1 ,._�,-'F1f11* I �_11_1 �nt ill �, 1141 1 I "'I'l � 1 ,4 i� 'A' 'a / \ " 11�1 14, � �_�, 'I'' i I ­ <1 - \ - / /,""' GAS METER 4, ...... "'l I i u, .1, . 1. �. 1, lb� Z,��, I 1�1 I I 'l .... .. ,,,, � 4.. I � I � _,U 11 .... .. o) , � � " I I �__A 3 , I I I I I _ I I � '�, , j'X � ','_,�, '' \ " , -.,,, r, L_11j� ___ I I � I ...... "I'll I -,�, I /111 / �, I N\ , 1, � I I . I I "I'll \ � ��,J` � e ,,, \ \ ,,, . I . � . � I � I '' .1 � I � , \ 1; , 1, �, \ , ,_ "",", " �,: I �� I I i "" �, �, I - , , ,, j , � .��­�� , I � � � I �11, '. �� . 1'�' � : 11 , 1� I � I � � �,,;,'. � - . � ell I . ` / ,/ , , ��, ,", �1, " I I � � ", , 1�1 �0_ . / \ "'I" ,,",___ � " i� � i ,�,;, ,,, I' ,� "A ;01-f I I ,ILI '��,% I V 11 I / �, I \ I ' I , � I I I'll, I ­­­11 k * , � I .� "I . , #1 ­ , I ", \ \ \ � , ­ I � � 1, b # \ \k, \ '""' - f", ill I - I "I � � . �,� 1. �,, - , , \ \ \ ­` ' " "' " ' , 4 , � I � . . 1�rll 6;'. , , �, � I �. ""\ 11�_11 ", 4,'P', _�"� I I 1, � 111�1 I " \,", ,,,� , , , '. , � N �'* ,, � 4 , � t�,tl I . I � 11'� � I.,— ,`�`, ��, � � ., , - � . . � , � I I �11 � I ,"�, I � " I f " "' t \ \:', /11 e , � il,l t_,,� .. I I �, . I - � I � � '' 0,0 4`� '\ ,' , . . 1, � '. k - � � 1'111-11� ­­ ­­ "' q,b I �, 11 ­,, " " / , " / 'TRANSFORMER-- , 'i ( ­� f" -, I � I " -! \ !'"A \ \ "I w i N 11 , , I "T 1 1� " , - 1� 1� ,� �. A'. �� t . , I _ I ��, '! \ ,/1 . 11.11111,'r-l�, ", . //\ \ \ \ 11 . � � � � � *,�_-.� � ,/ , , I 11. � I �;, � 1. 14�­ 1 , �­,,­ I r� I � 16 ", - \ \ ,�N"l,� � , I 01", - _ I - � I . I ,� ,0, A--'-,',,,-, , ,,, 1: I � I - , "I'll.&I . "I"111 \ \\ "I 0"wal"o- ft�%*�*Vwmml-". �-0444-4t,!W-""l,-W��wk�, � g ��­' ,t> �� I I , , , ""' I � I � � I �% � `�"`, \ \ �,,,�"/ ,,, 11 . ­ 4' , � , I I I ��l � I q / l, .,�/"' 1"', � "", 6 ,\,�, I , ��: _ I ­ \ \ \ V , I ,­ ,�J!.` f,j ,7'� 11�l I �. � � I . . 11: � .. il�,, �A,, "I , � �� �� , , " ,_�, I .� \��,,, \ IN 1_ " , , t � _ �, , ,,, � - � I I 0� . - "`,`�, /I 1 \, IRASH AND � 1� �11.1,11 I __ '.1'' 4 -1 , �� , I " \ \ , \ I ) I ,,�i, �, I I _1 ',�' -, .. I " I . � , ��,:, " t, _'. �� , ­,,,l�,,,- , /;`:", 1��, I � � I "I � I . ,,,,,,, \ "I '11�­ \ ,�- 115,,�,_ �1. �, , , _1­4 � I.,.1.11 1�1 I I 1, I '�l",��,��'ll,�"I'l�,,�""""�1)"�,- \ "';I/ � I I , , �, �", I . � �, I., ­ I ) I \ / ,,�� ,�', I , , �11 I 11, "'''i., ��, A''' � - I " �� �` �, � �� ", , �\\ ,\ \ �' J, , � i I , �_ .'�,�"''. I I , _/1 ", t�� 0 I I ", ,,,, 11 / " \ \\ I ,� ", �:,, ") , , I , "Ill"' 111�1-1 11" .. 1,111i�11_111 , ,--; , , , 'a- � � ",,!� � , � , � I I ,�""�, , I � � " , , , S "'.. ". � ,. I I ,� . ", � . ',­� , � I I ­,,.,­`, I , � , " L,._ RECYCLE BIN � , I ,,�,, �\ ,� \,,"'111' , / "I ''."�,,�"""����-"�,,�,,�"''', ,,, ,.,,, L, � " . ...... �,, _"_�'__ , , '_��,,� I I !`�, " ,; , " ,/ "' _141, \ "11 ... ­�!," �11ZWI,�'Itl�,,V_A 7 ", pe,E � � " _,'�,___' _.._,___', , "". 11" , . � I I , Tz / , -, \ � I . 0", n, I," �Al�,,,',�_ , , , , I , ,� , , ,,,� , I / - ,�, 'K "'­W', ,w 1_� _'�'d ,� , � I ,.,,, I � , , R . , 4,��,- " , I �1 - . ��;, , � ��, , , 11 I - % , , �., ��, I I ''I 1111", , � , ), I - 11� � "' ) ,� \ " �, ,/ ,� ,�, i t, -1 ,� �, , I I I I . 11 " 114'' I I " 11VI 111� "I - "", \ I" , � I ,�,,, , , �, , � 'R. 11 �� , I-Iipp . � I - �', , "I \ � I I ,,,�,; , \ � -�,,� I I , , �� i � - � � - ­­ " "I'll , , � I 11 I / I 1. , , " 'N I ,,� I I � , I 116 I 11111"!"A? ,� , , , "�, �,,� ,, t � I 1­1 I 1""' / � / \ \ \ " � , ."", '''' � t'. �. ( - , "" " , ��11 J ... `1� , f"', �1 �� c , ,,,�/ 1, "" , � '' I ­1l � '' \ j "I" "I'll � /I , ­ 1� " , '" "'I",--, * , " � 11*11, . " I , , , , " , , ', 1 I --- - \ 111-11 ,� \ �, , I I 1\� �� ,'', ''� ,�,', _ , \ \ < , Z, � �L , " I ,,,, p 0, � " - I ­ , - ", � . I 4. � � , '' , * 11 ­ 1'1,��,�1,111 I �Jll'.11, � � , I " , - ",I , �Ll -, L , , , \\ �1111 - "I �"-11111'1_11:1'11' xll',� . ..... I", 111,1­1111 ".. ( \ I "I � \`�,� 111111''T *"-ww,""*4" .1�.,1"40"w-w,ft"."w.,"4`, " . I lwwxw� � I "I �, I ", \1'' �,,-7-,7,7-�,�7t�i:7"�---.,�"---,�-�,-,�-, -, ­­­t-­--­-- , . I ,�, "" ),v ­­ � ,� . ­; V� "'k I V --Vdm 'illi" ""' , �,� 11� � � � A�l I I , I I I I - , " I _), .... � ­ 49 � , � I � # , I ; I I I I ; , �', . t , ��l '\ �,�� I �, ­,�,, - I'll � I 11 I . . , , .1 I I I I t , 1, � i _ , �11­" I '­­­­­­­­!!b , � " '\" ­l, MAINTENANCE 1""*'1w -1*1" .", " 1_�,,,,%,,,,111 -"",A,i,""�,,�,,,,,,,,,i,,,,,,f",�,�, �­ ','_�,i_, I � f­­­­­­­­­'­ I 11-11- \�, ',t`� ,,,I I 111 V`�'r'-,­-­­­ * 111;��111�1_ \ I I / I I VEHICLE I" t� I � 11 I � !""` 6!1 1.'.� - r I � � \\ \ \ -"Ik \ I I ��l 7 I 11­111­111­11 ­��,% 111'� ­.� �11 ''I 111111-11"', �' I I y ,111.,�,,,� [a I \ \ � � I I "' - "' 4� � r7�, ,, ,� " "'' I I 'I �, "' , � � ­J " , �', I \ \ � , � " , , I ", , I ''I'll , I rp, � I � I . , �t, �' I , � I , I (V I - , , / / , \ \ \ �, `� -,,,� , A ["""ill" Nk. I 1 1 � . , , I �, , . ,I $ 1 "A I , , , , , * 1� I - � 11 I 1, , 111,1, ,,� N." ./ � , 11�- I 141 � I \ 4 \ , , PRKING I � ", ,,, " I -� I . . I �� . � I I "'ll I �, it � _,�, "I ,­­'­,;, ,� 41� I'll, � I l ," ,��,,�, ��,,�,,ji � , , , I I . � �� �"111 N. A I / [k, /' /� , , "� ? I I I """ [ I 11 �� �, �, , I , , , I ill wm* "I 141,161 I � \ � \,, , ", , i I ,miwm* " �� I , . � / / � 1� I I 1, �' � / / � I, I ... I .... ­­-- 4 _4_1 ­111111. I I � , , I 1 4) � . � 7�_ 11 """ I 1 119 --- ---- , '' L-4t-,_�- -71-1 - � I I 11 "I ""' " � " � " ��: - I � I , " 1"' I ,\ % -\ � __ __11�1 I �", � � " . _ �4 � , ,�, ­ T I I SERVICE AREA I A" \ % \ \ \ \ 1, 4 NA � T" "I : I I i " "'' ""' �, ! I K ,�, / ,111-1,", \ � \ 1. 11 "I , � I / �_111 % """ Ra 1% �1;111�. I � 1\ , �' I "" . I F� �, - "i ,", 1, . , I I I , , t � "J, , J", I i I I I u, , I // �1,1',11,�', �,, ,v_ ", I I i I iw_ ­� ,0; I 11 1_1111_1__­ � � ... ... �, � . I I �,` . ,,, , t I I , 1. ", �___, I ,I , i , I � � �, I I � " CONDENSER , ., I , �,�; 3 ES, I \ N�ll i __'1­­1 w7l �," *�, � , I / " 111�\ A \ \ \ ) " 'I ,'�,', I Ilk �,�'i ,,, " ,.,,, � 41 I I " ... "I" I , :�� I I , 11 , \ � ,,, " ,,!,' � I � I I I �', �, ,,�",11� I � ,,,,, � � Ai 1�, j, i i 11 I , � I . .. . .. , ��, I � I I . '11, I �'�,""""""," � � ", " / '' il �!" I , �', ,,,I,, \1 I � w , ; , \ � :,�,,, _,,,1!"",'-,�,: � i . � SEE ARCHITE / I/ 11 � 11 , I I 1� !!/:, � \ \_ \ , \ I I I � , � ,,,,, � � 411 I 1, � �,,,, � I I I I 'i, � 1, . ­­,, 1, ­ � I \ li, _­",'_� �, A, "­� 11 "4�w � , 1�'114j, \ \ \ \1 I I ....... -, ,­­­­­­,­­­­ , -, , ... ..... �,���,,,������,,�,,�,11,�ll,",I ,,,, ,,, ­­ 11 I'll i ,"Id .. ...... �'�'_, I I . I I i I /I � � \ \ / F' -404WAW ..4��., 416. . / I ­­ � , ­l, � I , , , i I _-, 11 I / � ,,,, \ \ "�"�11�� 11�!�!!*, � I ,� , _. 11_�*,0�4*.�#.� � I I , , '" "' , ��' , ��, I � �40 "i , j H , 11T ,� I 11 ­ I 1�' I I , � s", Op'll ,,,i,,,,,,,,� i \ \ "I �,, _ ,,� " ,,,�, � '' , " �,,,'�,� � ,;".-.. I , I i I � � \ �, ,� �, I � � ''I � ­­­- I I � " ; �', \ \ � I I, ,,,, , I � t��,,, " , , . 1-1-1-111­11 "'i �,­, i I ,,"f �,, . � I , , I 1 41 : I I � 11 / 1_1 I I " 111". � 1� . I '11"I_ � \ \ \ I , __­ , , "" _, � 1 *4. 1 1 �""" I/ �l 11 110 I ­ I 4 I'l-11 i � ______,__ � 111­1111111111___, I I -1-111-1­1­11- I J.'__ .. . .... , '', __ � ", "'l � � . 1101, / � � 61 , , �,,�,, � I , � ,, I ­ I , I � � ,,,, \ , � �, I � � . �,,, i� ,� I � , I , j i �,,,,"j ""' f ! ,4 '��'1111",`1�111 11 1 �91 , I , j,", Vl'� 1�','Iljlll 4 I "'I"V, &��,�'-�� ,,",��'�',"',­','��"'D, �,'l wim �i,!,,,,,,�Y�,,.� �,v�,�� �,,','� ,,,,,,,2 f," 7i n�,,,,,,z ,,��,,,,11111111111 11 n,y� I ,� 7-- -t-� 1`11'1�11' , f I `�,-`lk ! I I/ ;�, "I 1�,,,,I�l,,'�,;� . I tp I , "'. � ­,",,", I-) � , � / --- ­­ I - ., , \ I 111�1� �,,Iil�',;,�,,,�� 11 I I . . � U"A' � � �,, �, i i � \ '� , ,,,,,, 'I ,�, 11 , , ," \ I I I ­ �, I 1­11111 �', I ­', I'll, ,111, I'll, ,"',,"",1, , 1111�111 fl�11`1� ".�111`11'1;1 11111�1�11X,Ol �,,, ,� """', �,�t� 14�,�1'11 1 4 , ,�\ , I "' , , , / � �� I ,.,� 'I"! I I � I "l'I'll'Il""Il""ll"""""""",� i'�ill'� I I �11�11, �, H T.�w �,, C,H A NI-4, I �,,: 1�1 I I'll , " �,,,!��li ,`,,'�,,,�r, `,'��,"',', �,`,)%�,,,', "" '­I�,r ,,,�,��,,,�,, "" I I I , I " , .,,,, I _­ _�, 71,11", ,�,""% I I W_ � / � I \ �,��,,, 1�1�111'11'�11'111� _1" -,,���,�,�,,,,,�i�,5,�,",i��", I '' � " �'�, ' " I " 71,4117" I ""' " ""m ,,,� � i", , w w I ,.�, - ''I ,,,, / I I I I '11,11,11, "Ill"""","�'�����:,,�,����,, ,"', ­_', . " f-I'll-l! 1,11,110 ) , , t I I I I / I I i �� . I " . � jj�',',e',`�", r, , ' - _­ B � I i 9, / i�, i-111 I I t', i , ,,,41'j1k­G,A!TE, ",", -, � L�'!'.:"' ;�-"�!,! ...... ­'­'1111 ­ -111, � ___ " , TYOE I C V, _._ . ....... __ I I / 11�1 - �, 111111111�1��11; ­­­. . , 'j, "!" 11�1 I """, 1 __7 --------- �___7 _,"'A'", '' , � �,_�, - L INK --F---E-,N / ; __�', � \ \ �, " \ t!1�,x'­­, ;��, ']',',,,",`)� I � `11 I � . �_ . o. I I I � 1.11­111­11 ­ __ 11 z - -L , 11 I I � I "", _____� _��',' "I" , t,', 1� 1� � L �, �, j 1-11, 0 , ,:"'_j1j,j,�'V', ­,i�c ­­­­ "I�'ll""I'�-�-,--,�---,-�,�-"-,----.,--,,,,/-,,--.,�-,�-��.�,�lI ­1111-11-111"'',"', I � � '1111fl 111M I " , �.� � " I I , � L403 � � . I 1, I I I I , I 0.­', �11, ,\ , " "�,,, -1 �", I API 1" I _______1.L_ SI;,v � , ,�, FUEL STONAUL , -T '' " I : ) ,�� ;, �, � I 1 4 LE t WITH MOW/ STRIP / 2­ , 1�/ , ) I i I I I I I I -1-11 11"Am ,,11- I I � "'),�,"';, : I \ if��b , , , 1�,,� 11111, I I I , , � # 1, 1, , , P0, ,,, :, I , I � A'' "I'll", ­1.11­1 I I ­-- A ­11\� ; �i��,A,S,i,_ , �,� I . � � " , , , I """',"', " , 11 I . I �11 I (,e�,"', .. .... ::, ""�)��,�,'�,,,,,',,,�""k""""�,,,�,�,,",,��,,�,,,,,�,�,,',,,,� �,��",,,,­ """ , V, , , :� , - : , _ - 1, , , ,,�_ ,%'' : "'', __" , I �, I " ,,�,�j�`;C�i 11 � �,,, "�,,, I vi� � I 11 , , , � 'p, I '', " 1�,,, "I I 11 , '' , '4 , , i t, 4� � ­ 5�1" 1�::,", ,�,­,, ., � ll, _ '� �, 1 / / I " , I I I I * , '�,,:-t';,� . ..... �,�-'!",�,-",,' '��,�!, "') ,,,,'�� " �il�:�','�10 , "',v""", '"' ", _ I , , "'! l� ", l,��,/,', �, 1­',� ... . .. �`� ,,, "A ........... 1 I �, N �',,,��,,,,', ��, . , , , 'g, " A , 1, I I ­ I " ,1­1''� "",­,­ U k " I I I 0 ,,,, I �TANKS �1�1(,,�,,',', �,� q, l, �i';, "i ­�, \.1, �� 11� ,f""11' �,'�� ", � , _1 I �!''i'l,,,',__ I ­ ­ 11 t�,,��,��,�,,r�,�t�i,��,'-,,','-,"'�,,,',',�,�l, ,�,' `,,��,,,�,\�, t�,"jif ��,,_,,�,�,,.� �,�,!� ,��,,i,,,,,,�i-,,, -� �,�,��_,,, " , ,,�,,�",:"",i��,,,����/1'�""�,,�"I'l��'I'l�',,,�',; �_'),,,,,,�i�(`�`,,�%,,, ,P,,,,`:'1, '' � I / 1, "I�,��,,�'�ll,�,'�'�""I�"I'����, k,;, ,,�� , '' " " � 1`�, "" """, �, , " �� '' � , I% 4 " "I',",", ,,�,�, �'_,', .A01_11 i? ,,,, 11 � - , ,�, �, 1­1­\t( ,,,�,,, ,,� �, � , " ,,,,,,,,��l�,`,(J,�', "''! ii:�, " , " , , �', �.,*.� �,,�",�e '' , ,��,, � - ,,,,�,, "':�,�,�:�� ",',_,� I , , t ,�,,,', " ,,�,' � ,� 111'11­_'�' "", '' "I \ , I ! ! �` ,, I "''�,,,i��,,,'�,�,��,�!,)��',,"�� n -11­1 � ­­ 11 , , N', I ) , , '11W l,,�,�"'� ,,��"""�,,,�""",�""",.�*,,%,,-,,,�-""","",,�,�,,,�,��",f "l',,,'*,i�'I'��e,�',�",-'�l","",",��,,�1'r",�I!,(,,', � 4,"'I, """�'�ll"�",,�',,",�,,,�,��,�",:""�,�,'�',,�,��,,,,,,',,',,',�,'��,,,�,>",::��,�,',,,�',,:',��,',�:"",��,,�,)"",���,,,',��,���,,,'i��,,",�,',�,)",;",�,�,",',��,','t,',"",i�,,�',"�\",�,,��""",",!,""","",�"",��,',',,'��,�""","",�,',,',,,,,',,,"""��'�,,,�',',�,���,',,��,'�,;""�""",,�""��l",�,',,,�,�,!,',,",k,,,,,'�,",�,�, , ',��1'1,11111"Illi`�,�', " ,,,�, "i ��,­K",?!'k , _ � f� ;,,- ,��,,Jl 11�", , � ... �,f,, _1 , , ,� ,"", � ��,,�'111',�� ,", I � . � 1, � ,c,�� I _ I - , , , " , "`�� ,,, ,,,,, \, 11 , , i ", ", '_'� .. .... ___ _ , , 1­­111­11_____' � 11- 1111.___111-.1 j ,� � \ , � �, I , ," i�-� ""I .._,­,�­ "Ill 11.111­11.11.�', " �, I �, , ",­ ", " I 0 �11 � 11'' ,,, � _( 11­11-111111- ( � , 11 'A I " I ',� ""' " "" I I - ­­�,1,1,111,1�rll,lr, �131,111'1'11`1113N,�,�'�� ­­­­ ,)�111.11-11�-�11.1-1�'C'�,,�",�,,�,,�11-1 ­ I ­ � Id 11��� ­1___­­­­__ ­11-1111­11-', I 11 - 111=11-1 ­1- I I OEF14 t� I / I I'll, �/, I I I 1, � �31 1,� Vl�',`�� 0,',A� �,� �� A,� ____17_ " 1­11[ .'­1__,.L _­___ __­­ ... I 1'1._­1­­ I 1� 1111 "I �:'��ll,�lki:�:�,:,i,,i,�,:.-,*�*:, I -, __ ...... , . I I , � ��,T "�� �,l , ­­­­ -­­ � , __ �� ­ � . �. "', 4 1 ,�41'1, ­_ I � ,�� �E I it, I It I I �, � I ': 1:�1�1 ­� ",, " ! V, 11 "" Ix'n . I 1�11��U �11N 1 , , , ,14111-1 _�m, `�,:, 11� , � , '! '' I I l'�,, , I �Ilt " ) 1, 1� "',,,,,,,�-,­. . ,i�', �, , I- ,,:-.,,, _. i�,,11111�­ 1 . ­­­ " "'':," "', ,", , .. .... "" , , . I i ""') I .4 � 1A I ", ,�� � ", '', � '' � I ; , �,,�,,,',,,,,� I I "I'll" """'I'll, ''F ­111 % , - li�11'i ", �, , 1'1'-,",,�, ","u"', �11',__",�,,, , 1,,� " '' 1. k I - I / I � , , " "', I . � _ � .1, . '' I I X, , ,�_ 'I'," "I'll"","" , " �_" I """ ,,,, � ­­.­�­'­� , _'Oz_,�­ ,M" � 0, I �, \,� , " ,,� I , I e I '' , u) l, _ , _1 I 11 , I I 'I', ,� , ­11 , "',­.", - I I w I I � I- i I i , I I I 11/ '' " % , � � \ '' I I i ­­ : 1,�,­�, � � I I , � V-41 ',� V �.. ,� , 'I I I , , , I `( `_�, \ , I I'll L____,_____ 1'6 4 . I . .1 � 1, � , I "' I/ I _'_ .... ___ I �/` "I " , 1 : -11 11 , '' , / ­­ I i "' ! - , ,'' "I 'ji:�, 'ji:�, I , ,"! ­­', ­___,___ ---.,,.,,,,.-i-".",.,,"�,�"",�"'',, 'ji:�, i , 1­­­1_111­_'___ ...... 11 , I ­ ... ... , , , , � I "I'll I -, , , H I 'l � I � I I � ,,, '" ,,,, _'�,1_1­ ... 1-1. - �" I \ ''I I- _1.1­1_­_ ____ � CHILLER ,-, ,,, " \ � 4�,4;,!l ­ " , I ­­­ � .1-1-b" �, 11 I "I'll I I 41;%,,�\\,'111�,,V � ; 11,��,�,�-,�,�,,�""",,���,�-j,.�,��', Id'st'r ��, I j&,"­ � � - r­-­­­,­­1:1­ "I �,x,�,.,, ��,7,q ,,�,,,m� �,111111 ","I'll 1111,�,�,� ­41­11`11­��,M,1111­,_ , � , 11>111, "I", �,,;___:, I �. ", � , ". ­ I � " ,,,�v,,,,� ''I I "", I I " � ,11'1.,,Z_­. ,::­­,_ -I 1�� � 0 ''I'll "", ` \ \ \ \ \ � N "" � E IEEEiFEEI I 1113 \ _ , 11 - V��11 ,�� "I A-1,11,1*1", " . 1-11 1'11,`1�11`1`11, \ \ \ \ I \ ("""', __ i � ""' ­ I' I Q I ;,., 11 \ � \ \ �',/ 1, I I "I", � ""I, t " A 4 . ­ ^I --- , 1� "' 'r , I % � ,�el' I I , "" I ^ I'll I I 11 1�1 441`4� � I I'll I 00m ,V"�U"41.�,4""��,,",�,�k"�1.0 I �1-0�1­ 11111111"111111.11111�11. ,� 11w1w1­__,_',. '' I / 'W" I I 1h . I I P*, � Ill p �1111*11'11 11" N I � " , ­1111111 I im""Il����illi��111,��lli����, 11 , . _1L .11 1�! I I 1111"! :, � ---- w 1­111111 I Owl I I �. " -1. _ i, _N "I I 'Vll� � I poll I ^ I ��,' � �'�11'1' i I \ , ","', I Ill iiiii'llillillillill,l , � �� 1111 ,�i ,�, , , ", SI:_11 111 Ill - I l * _ - it I 'i , I , . N i I / I I I - I / / \ \ I , � , " \ I \ "I m 11 V_ ,I, I i NN "', I �, / \ \ t, 1, ,��' � "! I � I -I_t____ $ of � ,,, 11, 11 � �. " I / \ I i , , ", , \ \ , \ I , LO � I �l , , � A ,I , I I � , �� 1� I "I 11-1 ,I C \ \ ,�",,,\ '' I " � I � , ,,�",,�,�,,,,,�, V- -�.,� "", � I -,,�, ,- / ) I I ,\ � \ \ \ , \ " / 1 121-8 6 4 � , f - �\ � 1111c � " \ I I I � "I'll _�, � I � / 1�, I 11, � , �, , I "�V1z"'l-, _1_1 ''I'll", I " p_�,_ \ "� ,,,,,, I , , 'x '64", � 1, / I 11 I "', 1�', " N, , , \ " I N ' ' L \_. I'll, I "" / , I .,�� IS % ­ � , '"'' � N ',� i� / , ""k,,", I "' V '' , V, - I I'll 44 .1 tqx1w1t14= � w!1!T11.am1Numw�1 I "I'l��,��l-l��1,1��,�","-"""�,.-�",��"",�, "�`, ",M­_ �, l�'�,�'\ -, \ �, , , 1, , "I" , IF - ,4 , f "' I � I '', � 11,�� �', 1. I � I I "il ��,­­ ,�� , . '��l _­ I i \1 1, IN" , \ 11 � I " � __ �­�'��,­, \ , I ?, 11 � I ­ " 11 � " "'r , , , � .11, �, , , i TYP TYP ��! !"11 %,. (J�� � � _ , \ , _ ��, 1 ,� , I I �, ,­ ­-.11-) �­, �,� __ I � , \ 1% ­­ 7,l'." (�'J_:��­� I ,�:, !� ... . ... I '"', \ I � ,�,,�,,,,,,,,�:"�,""'�',,',"'�,:��.-",�"",�I /__ '_ �, ,,,, i _ , "I'll' ,�, I )'''I", � , , I � � ­­ I , I , , , \ v`� " (�4�11,�. I I ,�,,, 11 �, � , I , �,/, ,� �, , &,\ I 11 ­,-,',_, 00 I ( -�`_l 191��111:11;"., V'�� I I I _�l 11 I 1, f, lk I / ,;, "11, " �� i . �` I , � , "I 1, - W, , / I;1 � ;1 I , ,,;�, ; -.1- ,�� �10%,� i '� '4 1 , � �� ,� ','�, I , " i � I I'll q11`-w10V%1."%1V I'll, '0.�,-4.�g ", 11 � � 11. '1\1 (I ,�,�,,,� , , I 11 _', , - ,� ,_,.,,,,;.,, 1�1 � \ , , , II I I -, - ',�%,��_' I 41""��Ilr 11 7l . / I I I � t1f) � )�\ t� .... .... � "" ,,�`,,�,,�,� N ''I" I , 1, (_; �,�":" , �,, � 0. 11� � � 1,"� ''I' "', 0 / �� _*_ ,� - y-\� ,,,, ') (N' I '. �,__' �� 11, t I I I I I I I ) "',_ / I , , , , , ,_1 ,�� I I I , / " , , \ 1111-111 , , I , I" I �,!� ',�""' , I I j �� ­ , "I'll-"V 1.1-111, 1") I 11 � 0 CI __ , I I ", I , #� I `­� ­��,�, '�, � , I 11"""', 11,� � -, ­1 J) ,i_ 1, I I I _'� " ,�­ I I "�,� , ) � � � , I I I I / 11 � if ,/ � � I 4% ) I I . I I I I " � \� , , , I I i , ') ) ,�) 1, , ,, I � �/ ,�� 1� �, 'I', �, I , 11 I I I I I p / I t, � \ , ` to // "I, `N �11� "I � , __ , " 1 1 1� � 'S �,� �,, I /� / ,,,,,il �, "I 'Ir- I I I iY, m %­_ I ", 11 I I I 11 i --? (' 11,," , ��' T Y-P )2) GATE, ,1­1­�, � � ,; " . I I ��' I """""'!" V / � �; '�111��,�-11117' 1�11, "'l I I � E-,,,,,,, I I j � $ � � , ­11", �, I 11� I i: I ��,,,','y- %.11­1Ak1_M1_1 ..... ... 1 %111­�101� Kvl�­Ilrllll w � ��, I u .. 11 I I I I I I �_, / 11" �jj , I �, % ­ ...... . . rr­­#, �,k,�-,�,-,,�,�,,-,P,-��,,�-,,,,,,,,,,- '11":,"J" I I I I I 1 \ -­ . ,­ I 11 i 1, ) � ,/ �� (' I' 11 \ � I �"i -1 ___ \ ,'� I / SEE,G�TE � / '� / I I / ; _ I �j' � ...... ,�__) I � ,, ,,'I / I 11 1�1 ­_1­­­11111!' I �)�� 11 I I 1� I I I I I I �; " t4 I'll "Ill',"', � 1',,%, ,41 I � , I - , j, '�1111 ) I/ " �) \ " ,,� I,' ", :1 " ""., �',V I / SCHED�LE � I I, I I 0 "', i Il I I ,,, 1�111 I L. � "I,", "',", '11'c '', i " H, , ' 11 I 1J, , " 1, I I �,,,, , ( 1____,�, "" 11 I , I '' , � I I _111,01I.V""I'_ ,1/ , -,-,. , � � " 'I, 1, _t, 1 I l -,)!'f 2 5' ­*��­ 1 11 "I , ') , I , I � : _�r 6 +- 41, I "" '­, ___,_ �` o I 1\ � � "I , _ /, � .. .. . . . . __,_­­­­­j,, �IVII,�"Ir:11)1"�'ll,�ll,"Io""",�;;"i,,,,,,,,,��,,,,�")",q"�,,,,,,�,�,,�7-,%"�" � \' � 1_ � - , �, " 11 "I � �,_`­, 26 N � , I ,'� � _,��ulf, I 1, �1, � I '� ) - ,­,41 I , 11 1! ,,,'� ,_ �___ _­_ �_ 1 5 / , , " 1, � � , _� - ­.� ,, �, ,� 4 " 1 1 'I \ ,/ , 1.0 �:, / I I I ", �� �, I , \ � I I I , I ,,:�, 41. I I I I �, , 11 I ',, "I 'I', 4 ', 1\1 , I , ?, _ - " Im ( E ) K';'�, "" '/ I 1 I I 11 � 0 J I I I " 11 , , 1,1 I 1111­1_11 ---- w 1 ) 11 ," � ,�' 44 I , I" 0,11, ","'.-I"? I'll'," �, "I 1� I I 'l ,�, � � \ , , I I I ,( I � 17, I "? 1� �,�;,; ,,;, N, %, _ I I " I ­,�� I , � ''I " , I, '"', ,/ ... 11, L400 """, IN 1,_ ­,­'_1 11 11,11, ( \ I I " /,\­ "' � , , , I '' , I'll I I "�, "" � '' W:',`:'� 'AND W01`�14t�") MAPS 1 , �11 "i "' , "', 11"Y _11"'� ��_ _"__��t ,; ... , ,�, ", I I 11111", .1l - I ­_',,�,,`��i to " 3,�,,,�""",��""","",("","", (,�` �,�� , ''I I 1­111 4 1 1 : I , A '', \ ­ �, I ., ­1 `� 11 - � I ,­411l1111­i I ,"�,;,, %��, "', �, ­'­ ­ ­­­`­V',�,",",?"' ����i�'�',�A�,"�',,,,,�,'�e"",��,-,, � --l- --l", " I "F", , " , , ,i� ­ " " ,i",,',"`��,M",\ ,_�111 �,, "I'll "', I ­ ­11111111-1111,- I 11,1�11,Z4,____ Al�`4�'�'�', �11 W'I N ­ I � �,�,�, , '':,"l ", ,,',`� d 1("', ��",: � - ,,, tj ,' � 0) .1 -,,,, -,,,,,,,,,,,, ,/\\ ,,, ,,, I ", �­' ��, �,�"Z"�""","",�,,,�,,,,,,,""�,� ��, , " ,, \ " I "I I 1_ L , - 1',11 ­_ -, ',',,­,­ """,)� , "I �,,",�,,,',,,',,��,,,,,,,""",""��""",""�:"''\', ,111-11", , , , " I � I I I I __'-",­,""'/"',i',,, ,,,�,�,�,,,,�,,,,,��,,',�,,'�,,,,,,,""",",,,,,,�,,,, ____11� I 1�1',11�,� ­1 67' � , k ," �, , , I 11".,,", I ­111 l`1'1_41�i ,'', I ! � 11_11­___, __ L, -',,);�` �, I , , �,��,,t I ,, ,, � " I f", , , , i, � --�-_, ", , I �� " - I ..... I'll' 11-IN ', 11 11, I , I " 4w1""1a&11A=.­1�11W1l . / 11 I'll I K ,�,V%p��7,0" ", I I -----+ ,,,_ " _,�,�,, � ;'' 1, ''I 1 6',,'", , \ : I , I 11 I I I e ,I/ , I i� ", "", " '' "", I I 'if ""', "", ,'', , " , I , � 111- 1�1,1',­­Wll,�",­, 'I'll, 111'�, "I'l ,Y�l I ',,,,_­,,�,,� I " , ,""""', ��',��A, ',,�`��, , I'�,�",�,,',,,',,",',','�',��� T",""",",'.<�Z,,,�',",'�,,, � t117', ... . . . nv,-,"',,�� I I l ", "_ " , ,, ,,, ,, '') "m , " " " , , "'' " '' "" �,�%,,�, i��,�,,�,�,�.*,',,",�,,,,,,;�e',',',,',I �,,,�,,����,�,,i���,�",r"""",-�4 �'_'�_, "��,_ '1;7:1,11,,�Y,��,"�, -,��,��,, I , " " '""", I ,� -1, � � -,� ", ,,, �_",­,,'­', " I � I 11 11 " ?I *111�� w1m, I ,,� "�, " ` , " ''J", _�_� ;11 10, , ­�� , � �, ,��,, , ,", I ,�, I'll "', ,,�" ,�, C',!,` ��,'_,,"'m� ", I ,�" I �, I 11 , , __ ?11 I ") """", ,� ", � 1. �,, "",,", �, , \ 1\1 � " - '', 4_,� , " , �, ,� " , ", 1 , "" " " " ,�111 i I , , ,­,, 11"""'W1, ,,, " " """' ,� , t�', \ , � , " I, 1"," ­­­, , , ,,, " '! " " " , , � 0,,�,M, ,(" ,�l I ) ,� , " ", , " "" '""', I � ���""�:,�'�":�,�",'��',,�,,",,', \""","",1, , 6"," , "') M �m'_', !, " "'' � ICU , , I , ",,"''; "), , ,,�",",l,� ,,�,,�,,,,,',,� ,,, `� � , " Z;1,1'�:e'1'1'1'1,1', 14 P,�r,��',,,'i,l , , "" '' !�, " I , 11 I I i ,,,,u,� ,_J,,�4" ,,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,�"\"","","","",',,,',"",�,,,�,,,, '. 'j,"'I" / � " � , \ '� � ,�,, ", / , I I I' I I ,,,, . .. .... �,, ", """, � , - ", , . � " ,� " '' , \ 1 " I I ,�,� I I "'11,111 � I �,,� _7 , , , , f .# ­11 � ( A � ,"�," "01"', I - " �,,, ,� "'� 1, ,�,, ,,,,,,�,�, I I ", /23' - I � �tll''\, ,%\ , ill I ;;, I ,� �'Icx, ;11 __7 -1 23' -­­--;o e- , ,,, I f 11 'I, , , , \ '. " I , ,� _ '' � 1 "I "I ­77 / - : 0 "I'' � ) , , ,11 _ �"! , w , / I I \) I I , , I 1�, I ­E / ` '111 �: " \ \ \ , ", I I , 1'1�1­�111 �W'11111��111,­­,i "'," '_1,,,111�,111',", , " " 1-Its TETHERBALL (X2) , %� I I \ 4' \'�' '\ ' 1, I "I " / ,,,, �� I , e "',­ ,,, ,,,, \ / ""I / I ,,,� ,,,,,, i�,�,,, " , " ,`�­, �", )�, ,�,,,,3 "',>,�,',,",""'i, , .�_ / ,&,� I/ ,', "\ , I � I , 11", " ,,,, ,,�� ,,, ,"", ,,� ,, L400 .,��o "/� ,, �'� I I I 11, I I 1, I Ill 1) I'll 'I', i I I / I I // ,,:�. 4 --- � �, �1, 0 �1 \ " , I 11� , , , , , I l 71 4.1 1 0# " , 11_�� � I C-0 '' 1_�._ ,�!, Ile 11 \ , I , , , '' I I / I J � --A ­1 :� , 11 "' � , , \ , , , , l� . -1 ­ "�,:11� 1,1\ I , I I' I I` \`," Ill -_ ',11 ''� I /' \,�� / : I I f"') 1''i''I "t ... �, I .__­ '' , f , '' " ,,, i� I AL --- 1, , 11 ,"/11 (11" "l,r", I--- \ \, I'' " I I '11 " ;� I _T�_ , (X4) D I 1_-,� "I I 1, 1A I "" �11 I , "I" , , � L400 ­4 �!�,;, I j I 1� rs. / "' '""' "i, � ) �, i�­­­­,­� ,, ,,, i") , " 1� / I / 1,11, ""� , " ,,,�`, ,V� I I i I �l 0% * / ""- /,�11 I I,--" 1_11 \ , A, I �,��; I ,\ �111, I '�111 I , .,�"), ,,,,�k % ", " 7 + 1, , � " �, I " / �,,;�, , 1�1 I, I " l" ,� ,,,i:A,i, " , �p 11 � ��,,, , I'll, I., , , ,,� �,�� ` ec')1111' Z� ,,� � �� _1�1 � � , � , ,,,, '!') `5$-- -,,,,,, '11, ��­, , , ',:�;"Z_� ­­­%­'11-11,111� ' """ " I ''I, , I , ,,�,, � / , , � ,,,� "" A - ­111112111 � "I �� � ""',",�', �, �A �, I '', "vi",'N �� .. . .... ,,, I ""�, 1), I 1`11� �� , ,�: � �,,�, ,_ %, �, 11 11" 'i ,,,, 11� 11 t 1'1111','�,', I ,Itll� !1,11, A �, ,0, , / I I I t """,�",�,,,,,,�,,�,�,,��,�,,����"""�,,,,1 I A 11 'Nh"ll� , '' �,,;�,��,,` ­­­­­­­._ I ,�� , ,,� � ""_444�,"","', -_ _ __111111,11111111 , "i" J _ I , " , "'," 'O , ,,,, , " ,,t�,,Ql�4­ I / I I , lcl,", ,� , , ;`�,`,R , � ," /I , , I 1111-1,111111" R ,,, � �`, " �� �� )"", "'�,,,�,!,"" , 11 """, -"'g ','q,k',,.1 ,,, 11 / �, .." ,�', k , , ,: ��A ,:',`��)""',,� " ", 1i I , , I "'I'V" ,,.n,,� q � , 11.1-111, __­­ ,��,�,J­­ ­­1 ____ 11 4"k, / ­­11,111- ��,��,,A,',,�,,'N,� ­111­ ­11-l'11- I'll. I � 'Ili' , I / p'O", �,�it�'�,?�,­- I -'-'-,---,---, I I I I _��.� :" `l!�_,,'1111�11411­l,,lil ,,-X,`,,� ", "'­,41�,,V­4, 4 1 J , 11 1, I " � W "Ill 'I'll I I , , ""`,� � I I I ` _11111`�,, �, -1111' ,,, ,,,111111­, , - 1111-11111111­ I / / N\ I I / / I- ­­___ _____­ 1_­1 --- � -1-1 ... 1- 111-1-11­ ­_1­11111 , � i / I 1�,, ,/ I � " , " " 1111'11�1!1`;'1111'� I,", I I I / � I : I / '11� I / I ,I / "', , , � I , , 11),ll, " "" I ' I _i�, �� �1_11 1� 1, I I , � I',, _­� ­­ ­ ­ ' I I I I � B I �, 11 , I / I " , '0 , " " " ", ­ _�, �, ", pa"4 ""I'll , ", ",""94w"�,66_ "Ill' , ''I H T 11�.- , I I / , -4­", \-HOPSCOTC , I I ,� ,� I:'' � ", I I "" I ,� i 0 Z+ I I ­­ � I I I I a "I t400 / "C_'�,,� Ili',,'''' / I / �� \ '', I I / / , I I T Y P I`,', 1 ) 2) & 3 11 11 A/"' 4 ,1L, / _� 11 I / , 1, I A \ �', "I""4' I ,� , , I / / I [';` / I I,- 1, � I / I " / 1, k , , / / / ,-, 7 1 11 / ,/ / ') I �, y. " , / I � , , � / '), / r I I / il "I, I I � , 1 J /I / / I I I I "I , � / /1,111 , / I I / / I � ", �', / 11 '/ / /I I I I I I I , / / I IN / /, / /' , I , i / / 5 1 1 , -".",""-�,,�""��,,�-,--,�-",�".-","'',''\ , I I / I \ 1'1� // / j / / I I ( I I � 1­1111 1­11111111 11 / I I 11 11 11 I I I � I 'I', I f / / , / I I I / / , '' , , ,I I \ /,111 W01 I / i I / I I �1 I I I ) 1, ,/ /,��", �, i� �, I I'll , I\, "", ,/,] I I I N111 / A I \ " 1� / I , / / / \ ," ":/ I I I I \ I I I / I � I � � � N-.11 N / � too I , \ /,/, / I / ,"I, " � � , '' �, '\I - I I 1 \ __�v \\111, \ 11, I I I � I --Lje-- / "/ "I" V"', - 1. , , I \ kl, \\,, I I \ I `1� ) .�� / _,"I.S/ / ?,/ \ \ "" � � � ,�A,, �,Z'J�% \ " I 1� ` , �1 A \ \, �� I I I 1\ I / (' B ' 'k � / I I BUFFER � 111"`,�,`11`1�in �1� __ , " i � / , , , 11, le HT. CHAIN , :'�11"�,�, , � � I �1 I'll I ,�', '�'1'111 \ I � I / �, L40 \1 V 1,�,,",,"�('�,,,,,,, / \ \� t, I ; I ,� "I "I" 3 UIN FENCE \� , I �,�,'��,,',,"',';! / x / , ) I I � � t� I I I " ", It / , I / i '�_, li I I/ I , 1, I / 11, , / / / � ,/�,:,� I � � ,� 1��­�,� I',, , I �, 1 � ", � � I / , , I I I 1, f ) I ��1,11, I ,, � I � I � ""', �, 11 z I �", I / / � �" ') � \ I I / � I", I I I I , �, / 1� I / , , 0 `,;,�,(,j� '1� I i I , i I , I k/ \ \ I I I I 111'1�,��,�,,",�',��,,, I j I 1/1 f", I,\ J"!�` / I I / 5f 60 1� " �, " I , e, , \ I , ��(�,!,��,!� , 1. "I ,� It, , 11" 1", �4 . , "" , '�[ �1, ", J I i�, 1 , , ir , , / , ,,, � / I A / "I/ : ( ;,,,:',",1,�j�,, ) I I I I I ", / ,I \1 ) ��\y,;,i',� � I , � , i I � I / � k, "I 1, \ I 0 I/ , \ / \ 1_,�.__ , �4 16,� :, I "I I I " I "I _`,�`_ I , , A ? , / �/"­� I / � ! , / I Nl� 1-� I / / ASPHALT PATH$ .,,C,1;1�11111'1"�" � ( I � ;11, , \ ­6�111 I � I I ,� / / I -�,�\ % Nl_� 11,1111 / �0�,? � A,� "A / / , ­,""', I \ I \ SEE CIVIL ­' 4 \ \ " " "i �,,,�n ," i , I '0,� , / _�,, \ p � I , \1 ­?"",`."','l,,'--) / I / I / / ;,�,,A/ij�,,�,v I � � I / ) \ \ I'l \ .,� , / 111�'�11 ;S�,�,_'111 �, ,111\ '� I / I , ""I', 1//' I ��5 I ''I ! oso ,�'�`11��11.1'1'11' / - i / , I "\­11111 / / ­ 1­11­11­­, � ­­! � I I I 1, \ 1­1111111111111111 "I 1111111-, ", 11,'_ I I ,,,!-�i ()5 1 -,"I'll, 11­1 ­­­ I I'll ­ I 11 "I 1- - , I �",�,�., \ ; .'11� ...... �".�,,�'ll�l".�.I..--"-,�-11�,��.11�ll,",.",""���"-"�"-"'I I'll I 11, ­11.11 ­­­­­ I 1­1111 ­­.­-, __"____11­ "I".-", I I I ­", ­1 '­­, �ll,�ll-�,�,�-,-��-,-.�",-�'ll''..,-�","/,� ... _,""""'', I "",""', " , 'm"N""'f I � I I I 11 � �_ IL. , _11­­­_, _1_1_1_11__ I_ I I I 11 � , , ,,,, `/ / �� I -, I "I, I , )""", i" ,,, i�� ,.�. - � J­ k � , " , I I I � I " N ", ", j I � I I I 11 ` \ � I I il I I �j I � I I � ­11_�_�S , 1, " 1,,�, "';1Y, ) / I I ; I I � � � ­ , " �i, ,", � J. � /' \1' ` I I � I 1, �­ 11 11 _"_ , / , \ , � I 1­1 ­ I �, "__111­­, "" ,, - , "?, "Al,l 1 ' \' I 101, I I � /­," / / I 11, �, �,�, "Ill 01 "", ,j,g ) I I I I ­ HT CH N 1// '`�� / \ \ I �,-,,��,'?',,��,!'q !�� I I'll , / 11 ;I 1� 11 �w 4,3 1 1 1 L403 Lf K � NC� i ;��,'Ii,s� I 1� -, ��'�' � / : - ,�,,,� ) , ""g, , I 0010"o , " i, I ''I / I I \ ,�,-­I�@,; / I )" ,,, ,j ,, , I I I I I I / /,�, I ",, I ( - �� , / , , ,I ?I ''I I I , / , ��t'�'I'll,"-��ll,��'I'll""�'�,'���Y,I,y "', I 'k , I'V , �-'.,,j,�,,�,, ,,4,,,,�,1�,'i',, � , �, ,�,�,,l ", , , / , / �;, �-$5,',,M,,',, , "* �� � , , I /1� , I - "i / �,�/ � .... ;�,� .71" 1,"I'll , I I , , \ f­G� 1­11" ,- " '", ` `1 , \, ­11, - ,", ,��,4` _ "" ­ , I i �;!"',',. ___ ___ ""'0- , 1 1�,/ , 1'�, I " , f , " , / I / I - ;� o"""'," ,,,�,, ,­,,i�,,�,_, l-,,'�,�,",', ,,,,,� I , �', , ,6 " , I I P,"� / I , �, ��m, " " " """', )/ , , , / \ I I" I Q�, / I I "", � � , , ,,, , ­,"""", _­­` �'"" 1�,,��",­ '­­­� I j 1� I I , ,�� , � ,,,� , "", ` �� , '' 11 ", 1� ", 1,�;��'1`1111�1,,� 1'�,,)F' 1, 11", I �, 11 t , �', / '"' I 1, I ",/V / ,, , i� i'�`� ,,,,,­�,,,`,% , , -, I , " , � ,, , ,, , ,, , ��Ql , f - ,,,,�,,�� , " ,�,,�,,,j��,,,,,�,"""""""!�,,, ,�, , � ell', � _,,,,,,�,�,� ..... , �, � I I 11 I / I I / / ,, _ , / / "' ", / . ) , " "I I V� �1'11? , 11, / I '� MEDIA FILTER DRAIN, ,',':� , I / " � �� � � ,f!'�, / '/ / , �� � I ( / ( ,� ". 11 I � "' I , I , ", "� ('I 11, ', " , , , I � / ;11, , "' �!"1'1!11"�111'1'111� 11 ,�'/ 2 I / 1! / " " � I �,�,�""",, ,, 1, , , ­ , , I , " , ", , ,�, " ,,�, " , , �\ ''I �i�,i��/ �, 1, ) ,� ", I (, �,, / ,,,�`,j" ,',��,',� � \\"1_1 , " "", Y �,X, !,;, I I N, ',�, ;, \ , , �,�v�l , '. " i / ,,,, I ,l"�,��,,,, /11 , , 1: SEE CIVIL / // // " \ V V 1, , � I / ; I � I I �/// 'i I , t ��,/ 1�,Sll / I I '' , I I I I ,,] \�, I I / ,,, /� ,��,,/ ; � 1; lk�'�',,`,�::�,')' , __� / 11/ ,1, 1' / / 1"' I / "v " / ',�f'y ___­ I/ /' I I I ,11� I ,,, I / / / ) �'11 ''''i ... il- ''i ,� / / i ',,i,�,,,'ll�',, 1_­' I l 1,11? 11 �) ��,, " '' lll�� / I P�� ,��,, � / " / /Vy" J/ I) :��,,,,,'!",'­",,,A .,--, I I I I , � - / ,"," I "v I / I I - / ", 1­,,,�P " I 11 , / Q,,�_y � 110) 1--i'l. 0-1AIN " �,, / '" B ," 11 , , � ,/ I 1,11 t �,,V // �,(-�,,,-,,�­`�,i / )­1111. ; , / "" I " C'114 / I I , I I ) X-*' (", / , , "" ,,, �­,k%l I � C,e) I mt '0� " [,,-INK FLNCL I � , � t ­/. / / 111 , / / / , - """ .... .. .. .... .. ... .. . I ... 0 "�,�,,,­,,, "', 01 '11), .", I 11-11 j 11_­_1__1 / I �",,/ / __" / I � ,� ,�,� , I � _ "'' I '' , ,� - �', ��'. 0 / __;� -7 , ,1�1 , ... , I " CD C) - ,�,' "" / 11''/ � �,­ I I , / � " ,� .- � ; , LIGHT POLES 11 I , ) jt�k / j I 1, ,�, 11 1 a' / / _f ""' I I "I, " 11" 10? "I I . 1/11111F I 11, I I , I'll", - "" , � I D � "I', /, , , 1, il / i jV",9p, / i , '11, '' ,,,�'\ "' /'] / - ''I � �,,,�,;, ,2'111i; I � __,"_ I , / I , ,� I "", I I � 1� ' � L4 � I , "',�,,, ,/ I , , , ., ,_ �� , IN LAWN / __,"__'_', "I, , ,, I , ",__V i / / 11�1, I I'll 11 I I ­__­ 1, 1�,," � ­,"'? 1 , I I j 11 "'J AS" ­11 I'll 11­1_11­­1­_1­11_ .... .. � ­­­, ,,,, 11 .11 1­111111­11,1­11­1 I ,�, �� If ,-�,�,�,i,�s`��­,`,, It , I %,", \ / To" I 4r*" . ALT �P�THI "I I 1­1­1111 ­­­­­ I ", / / el \ I I ''Ill / // '0,�', " 'I i � , I /I , '�I­y . 'I, "�, /�/ I �� SE' � C , ,,,', , ,­�,,,�$111 1 �1�1 / ­­­­ . . ... ....... . � .... . .. �J­ '"A R E A S­­ TYP­­1*____­____1 11-1--�-1-1---�--,--"�ll,�-�-�l',�, ,:�, _,_'?'� ""'IV , , / /, $ ,,, I Vle", ,I VII.- 1 � 11, , ,�,,�,�, . "i I 'v, , � ,� , I , , T11"i " I � ­911,11 11 I � ""02,11 �� 1 1, '1� 1"."IF ... , 1.11,11,1111, 11". " ''I I \" / \ I / / (��"' , , , , , , / �­­­,_ ... _ --'I'll., �11 -, I�A / , ,,, // ''I � ,� 1111V . / �,� " , " i "", 1­1­1111. 1111,­ I 'IN" I __ I I ­11111-1-­11- � � // `1'1� 11 " / �,,,., ":,/ I `l:�' ­-.11-111­1" I "l __ 11,� , 1,� / � I1-I.-I-1.111-1- "I \",f � , " / / 1� I I ,11 11 "��,"'111,�:�,,i � "", ,� "I .11 11 \ 'I / 11 , ,� "I "I �, � I � ... I I I ''I , , ­ I , N , /_ I '� e , , I � \ '' I I I 111-111'' , '', � , I 11111_�',,� ­111­111­1____ I 1--l-1-1111,­ I "I ­',t� 11 11 " "I, I ''', , '' '� '\ I '' ,�f � , "/ , \ I I � / \ 1__,__,____ ", �u�l,,�,���l".,"."""�,,���,�,�l"",",�,!,,,,,,*"",��,�,,���"4, , "_�,�, ," 1\ I ( "� �*`:�'�" VI'A`��l �1�'% %';� H'i'�l r,�,""'j, ��,,,� �,_,� :,�.` �,�� ,,,,,, �,,; , i ��', � � � �,',, ,,,',,,, ,v,,,�",� "" """"', t,"",',l �r,",',', �",,,� ,,� ��,,� ��' ,, _­ _­ , , , , I � 11 ,,�,',,­�? ,C��,�, 1,�11 ";,"f t�",',, """, '�,,­ -, I , � � ,,, " �,,"� � , �tm�m ,��,��, ,,,�,'3 , - m"", _1 "Ill 1� , ""' � �1�1�, , , , , � " /, \ Lu LIJ , , , � " " � I %, "� """'! �,'�,f ,',�`��,', ,"I"', , "",V !,,1,,,,,;i f,m, k."t"t ,��,,,�, , 3 1 11 I I I / \ % "I'll" ;s* N'1�1 ! m tl�m W �� �� % �,i , 111" " -1-1. � . ­`­1_.1_111­­_­_­­ . ..... _._,____ �,, "If � ;4 \ 1,1�,"'11 , ` I I I I I I , , , 1 , " I" I 1\ / � / � ', " k I � 11, � ,,,, �Y 4 ),,��,,,�,m,9; i , " , ��, \ ,�', , , � , � " , 1, / ,,/ , , \ I w I I" '11,,"_ "IN-11", \ "", I J 11 1­�, , -,,��- j � , , � '' , I I : � I "",`,", ; "' %� 7 I - � -', � , �/ I , ,,, , \ ,,,, I \ 11 , I , \ 11 I'll, "I'�,,�'ll,�ll,�,,�,���,,�,�'ll"�'llI � I'll, 1­111 ''I'll, ­111­11­111­­­­11 ­',­_l__ I "I'll, 1111111-1 11 `111111�1', - ) ,� ii, _,:�,�'111� , ;/ � I , \ I',, 'll � , ,,(','s`-,, 1' '' , \ � " � I / m I I � ___,", " I 11 " -,""I'll 111­ 1­1 ­-, 1­11­1_­______­ ­,­'­­.­,­­, ­1­1111­1111., ­­­ 1,1111111'', I 11>11 I'll , 111'� "'' ­­­ I ­­,", "'"'' ''"'""' ', J`� �, ��I' I , I , i I / I '. �, I I I \ 'N", ',,'� " "'Z3,"y " I "I ,,,,,'� el , " "' , 41 'l , \ \ , I . ­! ,�,`­ ,`,�,,' \ i I I j ­­', \ ,", ", ` ", , ,, , V �� , (0 - U) ___�_,�_____ - � " I I �, ,,, I . ..... 0110W.-i I', I , , "�:� "'�"':4,','�,��,,�, C, , ,�,,, ­­ �11 "", 11" � " , " I ft , " � I �, J ��,��11, " , 4 - , , ly, 1, / / I ,, � 'I, � \ � 00 , I ,,,,, - \ I I I I I I � , " I 4 : \1 I LO 11 ,/_­�w-'-'NV-­1%,,l I ,�, x ",:"/ I I I � � " I I I , �lii!il�� . � i =__z__==== ,!111 ___ _*Ne­"ql "I" w w 1.111 I I ill,, ''I ­­ \ '1�1 / \ . \ " " , I I I ,fV I "I _11�1­1­1 -----. 7 _ __ - _1 - i 11 � "I". -1--l-11-11" "",-,"-,---,'�"..'�1-111",�"""I "' ­ I 11.1 11-1 - �_%r I , I I i 1_�, , I I I I I \ I � � \ 11 , 1­11­__ "I ­ ,,, 1-1.11,�,�,�,��.�.,�,�--".�,,�,�,�-11 _11""", -_ - ­_ � I-- 1-1-1-1-.1-1 �� -4 ! IN I _11"'y", 'i � I �, I 1 / � , \1, 1, , I ll I ^ i I ­ ­­­­ ­­ ... .... _ , _ ....... , � � -_ , , ,11 " f � � ", � I w w I I I 1- 11 � .1 I 11 I I I 11 , , 1, I "I I I I I 114" 11 "I 11 _1 .. . . .. ........ _­­­ __1. ** , ____ -1-1-11-, � --- � 1-1 7'. 11 \ "I � I I " ,�, , k ­ I 11111111­11 1­111 I 1-1­1 1111­ ­1­1­11 11 "",--,.��l-.,.�'ll".��""�"",� """"', I ',"� I'�-1--�-1.��,,�,�-�,-�,,�--l�-,.- ______'­1111.11­­­ ­­ � I , �/ " 11 I'll- I-- - I , , , I . (O ­­__,­­­­­ """' ­_,_*_,_,_`_11111 ­­­, "I I ­ ­­­­ -�--,-�.�--.,--�,,�"-�-"-"�,,�.-I.���l".--.,.-,-,�,�-', I � I � 'k I I I , " 1, I I / I I I � , , _,_­­­­, �� ­­,­ " '� � ­­ . ..... ­­­ �S,,,�T , I , IN, �,,:�__, ""', \"� N`111 \ I I . " , "� 1, "'."""", I "I , , I I I I I / ....... %��11`1111 - --- " 1-1: "'i '11_1� .- i �/ U) . (0 111_ 11 ''I 1_1- _1111_11 11 _ 'I�'"',-�,�""�".,�,,�"",-,",,�'ll,�.�,,��l"-"-,."I .."--�.�1.1111",,�-�-""-�,,�-�-11��,�11.11-��,-"","-�ll,��-l'..",""�",� ......... -.11.11-11 - ___", , ­­­l ­ I '­­­ "I 1­11111, I'll "R -,.-,,, , - __��,_ I I I I '0 �"e,,,� .. ......... r.� "'cl." __� I ___� "111" I 1,011111 �11111­ 11 .... , -'-: 11, ��,'=­ -­­­­­­-­­­ ­5­­______ __� I--- f '' \ I I I'll, __'__­��13�-­-__ __ �N4 � .1 7�, O'N � _ ," _ ­� i '1� ' - -_ - I , ­1l!!_­ " ..... _ I *�� ­ __ I'll -2 I � V_1__ `l`0P.R&FZ"E`�'�'1_.1.1_' _­ 1,11- .'", -I,-- .... �, "I'll 11 " 11� , I _ 111:71, � - -", I - AtR, ­ "Ill-, I I I __ -,,,,- __,_ _.__ ___ (--,--. -,-,-, -A ,,,,, , ­,­,� I 11-111* %"", `1� I ", 11 " ­11 I ­-­­` ­11 I'll ,,, t - 11��, k" \ , , " I'll -, ., ............ .. ` �,,,,,��, _�__ �'_'_t, ­ N, '11�11, *�] i \ I I I �, '__' I I I 1, �,':::_'7 1 11 I � - 111­1 \, 11_1�1 1,11--.1 "111111- I I';.&. , I 1, 1 -__",��771_1` ,7 � L "."', ­- �1<11 I ,,, �,W­­._ , , �. ­ - L - ­111_1 "ll, "_-1,) .., �. N�ll,___ I I' , ), �", ..- ,,, -_-�,.,- 1�1 1�1 ", I ­_ � , 1� I 1, I'll." -IX ---"-,. ..Os-�­ -11-�- � I , � --� .... ­ , 1 1, , : 11 " �_­� 11 I 1".111111 � ­D­­ 1`1_1 I � , 'I\- I- " . __ I - 'S ��,��. .�"­,,, `� �,,- � : ...... �,� - ' IONS " , I I I �1� \�, , � 1_��­ �, ---A N �'_ �F_ 1111t_�� .,,�, \ 1,11 _­1 I , I I j /I ". .. ­­ - ''I, _ _­ " 1�4._ 1 11 I I , w ui 1*1� " ,,,��­_ ­­ ­1 ­4­4-,� ­-, -, -.-- '\ -_ -l',"'. - I 11� " I I , 4o� . "I 11� I ��,­ ,,, . 'l',_ .. . ... ­­ ".",­ ___ ­�,,�, �,." """I "" I ��,­­111 "IN , 11 �,, `-�, I," 11, I I j\, � I � "' I I NI-1 �_ --,--\ � -77 �, I �, "­ 11-111" ,­­ ��" ­,", - _1. ___ , ­_ ,"'. 11�, �,,,, , �,, , ��"" 111�. I_N,,',� ,�� --�,,, 1"_-1. '11, I �1� , 1.0111, -,- ,-- -.- ­ � ­­ ­ � - , , ,:!�:�-�..^,--,:���,4:;::;:!:�ili;�:i;i '7�, ­�­_, _ 1_11�1_1" ,_­ "%,',� .,��", 1\ .",4� ,,, I " - -1 'i z z ___ " , I ­­­' ,��,A� .',,�, "", _,_1 ,�,,,,� �, I \ I I 1�11�' "'," ,� �1'1 ...... " 1) 1,,�,� \ ,,­ ___ -­ .--,, _.­-, ,��,.�­,N_1­111 ,.V."� awwam--111%_� 1_­1 , �� -,"', ", ,�,_N_1�1 __-_ 111�_"" "l. *1-_-11 " 1� � �,, I \ I I � 1,011 _­_ ___ I— 1�1 '_ 11'.�,, -, .�­. 171'_�� ",',_�' 1�1. 'I'l _,,,­- 'll"N - _ , 11--l", "� ,,,� , � " -,,.,,, %"',, dl`� �O .,�0'11 '_..'­� I--,' ," , ___ , .1, I I /_ 4- ,--l" I I _.- ", 11 - 11� ,,� ­ � .��,,�,,� p'll/ I I �­_ �,,�'00.-1 ��11_1 �- ­,_��O, _ .. ..... �, ­­­111 - ­_� . .. .. ... -1 1�1 ­11 , 1- ­,", "'1­11 I" , \ I I , ";, I I ..j mmmi I ._­� .l­, ,\"--., I I �.-­___`o x " - ,_,", --,,- ­_,-­- ­� 1­1 1��,-� ................. tl �,,�. �,,,�,, ��N,, ,,,,,,,,� 'll," I I , , , " I 1, � 4 r­`� 111� �1_111' '11�e`l ,.­­ `::"; ,_ , 11, ,-- �,__..__ ,,- _­­ 0_w_*0_1* .-.1-1� ___ ___/ \ %,�� � �1' - _;4_ - - _.- " �� I- 11.1 `­,, --�,, ,,,,,,-. , ,,,, "k,, I I 1', '', , li / I , -, ,,,O,.- \ 11 _,"'I" % "__1 % -,,,, , V­ 1�1,1� .11 A _ *" ,. � "I., ,�, , \"I-- ­ \ I ') \1 I I I ) I , 3: , 1�1 �111_111� ", I � I I ,,, '' , ,,, I I -,-- `- ­­�,, � "1'1� "I', N" � ­ X I 1. �0" , " ___-� 7711_� 111-- �,­_, \ ) J 1, � \ N-1 N ;11 I - , 11 " 11­111' " '' I ,/ \ � , 11, / ,�-`11 �- "...4 " � , I ,�', "''I I I'', i ,­/ ., � , ,,, I , , , I 1� , ,.�, '''.. " �1 ,O , , \< \ ""' 11 11 "I/ , , "I , � "" " V/ ", "I., _",�_­­, .,",, , \ , " 11, 144, I � I i ",\ , ", < I , I i , � ­ 1-110 I'l-, ;,, 1, '11, I , I'll., ."'-w""', .1-11, \,\1 1, Ill,' I I \ / �:�, , , " , 1,��,�,,,_,,. L , ,, .11, ,"",, � , / ­­­ '1111,1 1__" .1,11, ,// '1� , " � \ _� llk� � I 0`111 0'�_ 11 \ ) 0 () "r I ,, I 11 , 11 I � 1, , N "x I I \ I." �, . 11 " I �,­-,� /I 11 I I I ­1 ,%,,' "', ­'/ I-1110 % 1',/", 1�111 � I \ / ,\ \ I 11 i 1­:, / � ) \ I I --- ,, I 1\11-11 I " , "l ''I I ', "I'll I NII-11 I. � I fil�l 1, ) " , ZOO f 1 �,, , � _j I \� .__ ", " N, � � " 1� I ,_," - 11 '11Q 11 11 1­ I 11 1"k", �, ­ 11. I \ IT I 11 " ''I I , , , I I " ., I \ I , I *>1, '1�1`11. , � I'll I �,11 I I V ,,, \ I"I'l �%� � ''\ I 1, \A I � ,,�\ ""', �11,,'\ ,,,, 1 , "111,111. I � ,,, 1. ,,,, /\,, � 110 I I I . �� 11 "', I 11 �, , '' \", ") �, '' .111�% ­1 � , I'' ,,, ,' � \,� /, , Fmm Fmw ,� ,� ",/ I\,", N. �"111'11" " '\ �i 11 "I""\ \ ''', I . .... . "'* ,--, I-— I ._'.� � / / - I I � z i 1, f � I > , , "' """', i /7 , 1_� , � I/ � \ \ " �, � ', _�� I' I" , ­"!, � I " _. " "I"", " 11 , < , < �,I­ ", �,,,�� , �11 , )�� 1, '', � ; " "I X/ !'', � � I \ 11 / 11 2 2 1 �_,,N� I. I '111� 11�', �/ ;/ � , � " � "I " ,\ / ,� "j, v '' 'L \ / I I ",,_,% 11 'I �'1111­ """"I I \ I/ 'I, \ '' ," " , " "", / _"\�N ""'N , \'�`�, " / '' I \ � I \\ �,.,� � b \1 I k. 11� I � _t "I 11( \ �,,, ­ , , _� I ,�­, 11 I I ,,�­ �� ' I /: �- 1: . "" I � � I ,\ ",, �� / �, i , � �/ ; I I 11 � 1�, I � 1, �', ­1 � '\ I I � I I � ,� , 11 *N\, ", f �), Nl�l /1, , I �� \­ M I ri I \ ,�� \ / I I 11, x�, � / 1`� " "I, I \ � ,, '' , ,�, V.." , I'' '' - ( \ t - TI­ il zo"3' zf3% 't I'E E T , I " , z", A"""C''LINO , I 1, �// !",/ \ " \ , I I ­ J? I , I I I I '"' , 1, ,,, � � '11\ " 1 1� ) ­ I—- I/ I `1� I � -------- T___ - / I I , " I 1, A IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �111111111111111g',,, i III', , � 1'�', / _\ .,\ 1'1'�, ��1111,1,,, - I �� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!IIIII " mm,� so , .1 I I k 11 __..t__� / ", /,/,/ x ,� i� , I / � " ,��, - r,,,T � V� I � , I I � � , /.Ile I I , , , � , ll , I , _. a / "�! , 1�,, r 0 11 / %. I , I I , I I �1��` ��,,� I- , 111�1`1 \ I I I ''I --ri-11- I I � I I I I \ I , I , '1/ \ m I I , I , , I �- / , , " "I" \, , I /,/ 1, 7 \11x .-, � \-n '11�. , "V , / " \ �, "I 'I, 1, 11 , I , ,��, \ , � , , , , � 11 � , " / , I , ,f 1, I 11 m ,\= , m "� � /" \ / , \ / � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII , � ) � , I " , ,­ , , ME I 1. �pw' " 1�% " � �, " IN � " I � , ,,� N, , ", , op ,/, �, I , ", �'' 1 1, ,\ N _� I Im IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII m sm- Sm m IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN m6" ,'� � \ . 160 " � I= 110" mW j!, "'.1 ", ,/ I � 77�_/� '� ­ " I , 11 , � 1. 1, ..., � , 1, I!" �_ __� --%r- " ��­ � ,/ ­1 '--,, - Tri Z5 11 ­� 'v` i"", 7�, ,� ......... ll I 11 1, `,,'i`,�_ i �\, 11 , I ��S�i,�\ � , '',A_ / 40 ",'' I ,/ -, 1 ` ,"',,/,"�/ / ''IS SHEET ,� "'' _, X, * 7��_',' , � , , , , , - ", I _­­ - , " ,, ,N MATC'ri'LINE " I -LA- __ __2t _�_ '11, �11111 \ A'',_ " ____ "", ___�_ -_ � �' , 141, 1 I ,,,, 1,�, I '-N 1, " , I 11 " ,� -�­- _'l .,�� I I / "N /1'' 11 I , " I � I I'- I% �', I / ", I � I'll, / ­l - /) � I I �, I/ ,� ,/ - ____777 , \�_. I � _�, - I , � , - -`.� ­� I I , 11 ­_ ­ I "l f", - / N 14 "I ,I I , " I i- \ v ,,,,, \ V , , " , A' � _� \ I Ill , I , " � I 'It it � I , . I I 1, 1�11 \ � I \ "I/, ,/, 4� / , _,� _ ,ll,�.',, , , �": � I , , , 1� 1_ " � z � , � I �' � � I I I I I i I � ,� � �4: ,,� " I , It, , ) �� " , _________, ___ -_ � __ I l i T���___ i I Revisions i I I ___��_ _1 1 I --- f scription 1 ..� 11 I � LAND USE � I l � RESUBMITTAL 1 I - __ __wiwww"___ I Ell I 1111511, Igiligum - I �____ I .111111111111F i i 6/21/2019 lI � 1i I I � LAND USE � J I I - RESUBMITTAL 1 I' ' --- ____ ! i I 6/21/2019 L so 0 01 I A " , o"ITE `L E N` L A r Kmv& UA*w `E M E N&I T ­­- - "I ", I I ,�,,: � 11 - �, 4� _ I I I � ­ 1, 11� I � � I I , i, �' , 1: il I il , I 111� " , , '' , " I., � � �� I I � 11 �, I � 77� �� 1 , ''I " � �1'1 11� , ­,, ,�,-':�,� : ", 1­ ... � :" " I i '15 "IJ 6, 1 I� d 7 v ilf s 1 i;'. r S41- *:' __ 2 M� r s't o0 qQ < 3t 2 Lu u-j -J rN m t aZ to V �wrw►;; Revisions pescription I •. fUSE . ADDENDUM 3 1 •A LAND •� N IRRIGATION PLAN cr.ai F 1#1=an.-n" A-1 POST CAP, TYP. POST CAP, - TOP RAIL STRETCHER BAR, TYP. TYP. 4\.4 4�4 ---- -- STRETCHER BAR, STRETCHER BAR BANDS AT 1 TYP. CHAIN LINK FABRIC 0.C., TYP. LINE, END AND CORNER POST, STRETCHER BAR TYP. BANDS @ 12"' O,C, z LINE, END AND __j LINE, END AND TYP. 0- CORNER POST, CORNER POST, 0� TYP. YP. '�' T T 0 BOTTOM RAIL PROVIDE 6 2"' MAX 12" CONCRETE FINISH GRADE MOW STRIPS WHERE NOTED ON PLANS 41 .,...._.I I I I 1 I i I HOLD TOP OF FOOTING 11 11 i l I i i I I l BELOW FINISH I11 1I I III I co GRADE IN AREAS d4: WITHOUT CONCRETE MOW STRIPS. NOTES: I f9 99 MAX. POST SPACING PTH ;0 EMBEDMENTCO RNERS ORNERS AND END POSTS. 1 w 3 FOOTING DEPTH, 2. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPONENTS. TI NAL INFORMATION ON POSTS, RAILING AN D OTHER OM I ONE b i STRIP. . PROVIDE 12 CO NCRETE MOW STRIPS WHERE FENCE FALLS IN LAWN AREAS. CENTER FENCE ON 4. PROVIDE CRACK CONTROL JOINT CENTERED ON EACH POST. VINYL 5. ALL FENCE COMPONENTS TO BE BLACK POWDERCOATED, OR BLACK PVC; L AS SIECIFIED. . PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL. 4 uR 6'HT. CHAIN LINK FENCE Scale: 1/2"=V-011 CAMERA MOUNTED TO I.,C�:.I, HYDRAULIC GATE SEE ELECTRICAL INSIDE . POSTS CLOSER(ON.,,... # � LINTEL W# I L "� ,� D I C SEE HARDWARE ON PLANS CONSULTANT 4aa SCE, LATCH POST SCHEDULE. } SINGLE SWING GATE " CLR .� r s TRUSS ROD WTUNBUCK LE PANIC BAR EXITING DEVICE. SEE HARDWARE SCHEDULE. 0 MALLEABLE CHAIN LINK FABRIC AND TIES I INDUSTRIAL 00 HINGE STRETCHER BAR (TYP. 4 SIDES) 0 .......... .......... .. *"'*'* . ............ Lj .. ALL JOINTS WELDED TO MAKE SOLID FRAME O r -1 1 00 PROVIDE "0 FINISH 12" CONCRETE MOW STRIPS WHERE GRADE ' NOTED ON PLANS HOLD TOP OF FOOTING 6 BELOW FINISH GRADE IN.44 FOOTING SIZE, AREAS WITHOUT CONC. SEE SPECS MOW STRIPS, TYP, 2" CLEAR FROM FINISH GRADE NOTES: , PLUMB AND SECURE FOR FULL OPENING WITHOUT INTERFERENCES. 1. ALL GATES TO BE INSTALLED 2. ATTACH HARDWARE BY DEANS WHICH WILL PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL. . ADJUST HARDWARE FOR SMOOTH OPERATION. " GATE FALLS IN LAWN AREAS. CENTER GATE ON MOW ;TRIP 4. PROVIDE 12 CONCRETE MOW STRIPS WHERE AND PROVIDE CRACK CONTROL JOINTS CENTERED ON EACH POST. aw ALL GATE COMPONENTS TO BE BLACK POWDER OR VINYL COATED AS SPECIFIED. . SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 7. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL. A\ i­otDtz) i RIAN GA i t= WITH 01 RANSOM PROVIDE 12 CONCRETE MOW STRIPS WHERE NOTED CAN P1w,..,ANS ■urr,�.'�.r7.�r dN LINK RIC DLE RAIL a w w O �Aw LION WIRE O WIDTH CONCRETE MOW STRIP. M► OVIDE EXPANSION NOTES. �,,v� CENTER T R FENCE E FENCE # /�#,.��.". IN LAWN AREAS. C.a �. E C MOW STRIPS WHERE E , 1. PROVIDE C�CN ,�II # #,, T. EACH PO NT JOIN TS CE E L STRIP. AND II�CVIDE. CRACK CONTROL J .w. ..:. .sup e ....,.v. T TO BLACK POWDERCOATE O BLACK PVC; VINYL AS SPF 2w ALL FENCE COMPONENTS F.I TM TI FOR ADDITIONAL ��. .�#SPECIFICATIONS O REQUIREMENTS. . PROVIDE �:)J­IOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL. 10'HT, CHAIN LINK FENCE 1 O" WIDTHS VARY -- SEE PLAN AND GATE SCHEDULE HINGE POST '" CLR. MAX LIJ '- MALLEABLE GATE FORK LATCH INDUSTRIAL FOR HEAVY DUTY HINGE PADLOCK , Cn DROP ROD ASSEMBLY W CL r CAMERA MOUNTED TO POST, r� SEE ELECTRICAL J-.,—HINGE POST STRETCHER BAR (TYP. 4 SIDES) TRUSS RODS W/ TURNBUCKLES, SEE SPECS CHAIN LINK FABRIC AND TIES FINISH C'`_Q AnP" ,r PROVIDE ALL JOINTS WELDED 12 CONCRETE e TO MAKE SOLID FRAME ,�• �� � `r MOW STRIPS WHERE HOLD TOP OF �°,► NOTED ON PLANS w A, � . FOOTING BELOW f HOLD TOP OF Q r'f TING 12 DIA. CONC. CENTER FINISH GRADE IN �. FOOTING , STOP WITH STEEL SLEEVE AREAS WITHOUT CONC. CAW FINISH � BED. ` I GRADE INSERT. MOW TRIP, TYP. i / � ,•i r NOTES: `�./♦°...... ����... ��:r =���'��,.,, �. 1k ALL GATES TO BE INSTALLED PLUMB, A N D SECURE FOR FULL OPENING WITHOUT INTERFERENCES. Ll H HARDWARE BY MEANS WHICH WILL PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL. . �� 3. ADJUST HARDWARE FOR SMOOTH OPERATION. w FOOTING MPROVIDE�ID I CANE BOLT AND RECEP TACLE IN PAVEMENT TO SE CURE IN CLO SED D POSITION. O � . ALL FENCE COMPONE NTS NT TO BE BLACK POWDERCOATED) : OR BLACK K PVNOXC VINYL A SPECI FIED. ED TALL ATION AND LOCATION HATE f T BOX INS \f�{�/ LOCKS. w COORDINATE K O 1 PROVIDE EACH H VEHICULAR R GATE WITH NEED ED. A . IR DEPARTMENT WITH FIRE REQUIREMENTS MOWREQUIREMENTS.STRIP AT FENCE CE 7w SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL SECTION VIEW NTS 4 8. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL. CHAIN LINK DOUBLE k10SWING GATE 1 TRUSS ROD W TURNBUCKLE GA P BETWEEN WALL AND POST .�M I- I L�N OM MORE I1AN FENCEF POST., SEE PLA NS NOTES: 1. ALL GATES TO BE INSTALLED PLUMB, AND SECURE FOR FULL OPENING WITHOUT INTERFERENCES. 2. ATTACH HARDWARE BY MEANS WHICH WILL PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL. 3. ADJUST HARDWARE FOR SMOOTH OPERATION. 4. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. 5. ALL FENCE COMPONENTS TO BE BLACK POWDERCOATED, OR BLACK PVC VINYL AS SPECIFIED. 6. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL. UaAIN LINK PEDESTRIAN GATE Scale: 1 /2"=1 "_ " AND SPECS OWN GA .V. STEEL PLATE, } ; t SIZE PER STRUCTURAL` WALL, SEE ARCH a J BOLTS PER STRUCTURAL f FOUNDATION, SEE ARCH 1 i i t j 41 � � A ' . 1 I ?� f , , Scale: "=1 "_0" Scale: 1/2"=1'A V N Z Ce - N N if N N z �- V LA ui Lu N un uuZ 1A 1FI1Jy MFWO[/1IM�] *N9P Revisions k r Description AND RESUBMITTAL 1 e • 6 .: 1/2019 LAND USE SITE DETAILS .t OC) c) cox L `� od cc t 00 �+� N L L t LJJ (-- N ""*wr W LL C) cr. �4 w C!� 00 M CN F- LW to Ali W ti CV N44600V z .. W ,Z 4mmo Q n CL 0 tl) W CL E 0 u 0 z down f N 000 L/) 0) kA q < Lu 2 .0 Lu --J m �.�. uj Z *01 p M 4.� to �P Revisions I"�� IN ICI IIII� d .. IMI Description III pU lMMI � I, d �r LAND -- �'I�w II�MI NV �I lull 5 i nl IMMI IIIIIN MIII NIIM� UIII A D iii N D U M 3 r� �k� II� MM III IM �I� Nib w '-LAND USE RESUBk �► II I III �M III II III �Ilp 6/ 229 II II III pll IIIM MIIIII u11111 IQIII I I� V I 'BUILDING PERMITI SITE DETAILS LANu uaE beTAL m"IESiUBMITTAL ut)120A2112*'uj'H 9 F 0 V Z arm N • M N t,C) C3 N v7 N 000 kA ui W ;-- cy) C`J < Cy') W -Igor V) uj Z Lu V *J kn Z Z 0 Revisions Description Ili �I II�II�I pIM �IMI� 11 LAND USE R B „ 4 MMIAMIJR11 ADDENDUM 1p UI' I 'I �I� Ili, III III r • tLAND USE 2U�•IBUILDING 1 Al I IM� N upll, ■ III IM p SITE Vn& Drow" c..a 00 Sc— z w 1 0 0 r- a z U 0 _j r� 1.27° TRUE NORTH PROJECT NORTH i 1 *^/^ 1 /&%Aft A 0& A ii. '#r mmmi"I"'TAL D 0 " um"' , IT 11 il. = R E b" OnUm mDm" 6e.,�n;S:} Z 4q- 0 C) Uj co 4.4.A "j 773 u- Q) C) cc uj 00 +N F-- W � W fy_ I -- c" U) z W �5 Z 4mmo; 0 --- X CL 0 W W s; t 77 �t Date. 5/10/2019 Job No.: 2179 Drawn By: LL Checked by: SS Revisions # T Date Description I I A R"' C H I T E C""" T " A I ITE "PLAN A ARCHITECTURAL T I E PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" 0 11 WIT SCALE: 1/8" 1'-011 METAL LOUVER SCREEN SYSTEM LEVEL 1 � nit N, r /j N, , / I N. I "', 7 77 \ / \ \ \, < " I / I IN, N\ " I, V/ IN N, IN, A, N, / IN, N, A� I \ / / "r J IN, "I IN %I u RTH SCALE: 1/811 -1 1-011 r)A1K1Tt:n0_A X/CTM: CLOSURE ROOF 'H METAL LOUVER IFILL PANEL 31) DOW ATTA3-1 TO 411 (s�01\11 PAINT CMU-2 STEEL CHi A sm CHILLER LEVEL I hvww DIM POINT IN IN, NN 10 —10'HEIGHT CHAINLINK FENCE WITH GATE PER LANDSCAPE 22 A004 20 01 #—Off SCALE: 1/8 � SCHOOL NAME, MTL LETTERS, FLUSH MOUNT TO CONC WALL 411 ALIGN TOP OF ,EQ Eta 10 = ITT 1 1-11,111,111 FRq 1 1 , Ulu, 1101WID kill ��piiilim lip 'WTI POLO a 0r I � � 2. 1 � ® 1 8/AO04 41x 5CAN WASHING METAL LOUVER SCREEN SYSTEM RAIS�Z_CURB FOR CAN WASHING STATION AND TRASH ENCLOSURE PER CIVIL ROOF STRUCTURE ABOVE TRASH AND RECYCLE BINS COLUMNS PER STRUT, TYP 0 W mwl," PRE -CAST CONC SILL 8/AO04 OPP 00 00 uLj co cc co co I—, W (D C:) LLJ W U) X =woo C) QZ W c) 41Z, 00 W <D W C) W AN 5- 0 X W UJ 78 q� REGISTERED ARCHITECT REBECCA BAIBAK STATE OF WASH I N,0370, d, j,� 0, Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: LL C hp.cked bv- SS Revisions a Descrip-tion 4/26/2019 BUILDING PE RESUBMITTAL 2 A E No LA R Vo I E WZ`030 0 GENERAL NOTES 0 9 a a APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF NEW STREET LIGHTING. SEE SHEET E710 FOR CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARDS. f n APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING 3-PHASE POWER POLE, COORDINATE RELOCATION) INTO AND EXTENSION AS SHOWN PER PSE STANDARDS. PROPOSED SERVICE POINT FOR NEW STREET LIGHTING. PROVIDE NEW STREET LIGHT SERVICE CABINET & CONNECTION PER CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARDS. ►EE SHEET E710 FOR CITY OF FEDERAL WAY STANDARDS. PROVIDE (2) 2" CONDUITS FOR CONNECTION OF POWER AND INTRUSION/ACCESS CONTROL/CCTV SY$TEM FOR GATE, PROVIDE CABLING AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE FOGTITE A I TYPE 2 HANDHOLE NEAR BASE OF POLE OR GATE FOR INCOMING CONDUITS WITH SEPERATION FOR POWER AND SYSTEMS. CONNECT HANDHOLE TO POLE OR GATE BASE CON UIT FEEDS. CAP CONDUIT UNDERGROUND AND PROVIDE REBAR MARKER FOR FUTURE VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. PROVIDE (1) " 2CONDUIT FROM MDF ROOM FOR FUTURE VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. PROVIDE (1) 2" CONDUIT FROM ELECTRICAL ROOM FOR FUTURE VEHICLE CHARGING STATION. PROVIDE (1) 1" CONDUIT TO PIV FOR FIRE ALARM TAMPER SWITCH. QC) EXISTING AERIAL FIBER BETWEEN POLES. COORDINATE WITH OWNER AND CENTURY LINK. 10� 11 PROVIDE (2) 4" CONDUIT FROM POLE TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS VAULT. lle� 12 PROVIDE (1) 444-LA TELECOMMUNICATIONS VAULT AND (2) 4" CONDUIT TO MDF. COORDINATE WITH CENTURY LINK FOR FIBER AND COPPER SERVICE. 13 PROVIDE (1) 2" CONDUIT FOR CCTV AND DATA CABLING, CONNECT TO HANDHOLE. 10001*0 14 PROVIDE 2-STRANDS OF DUAL RATED INDOOR/OUTDOOR OM4 MULTIMODE FIBER FROM THE MDF TO EACH NEMA 3R ENCLOSURE LACTED AT CAMERA LOCATIONS THROUGH HAND HOLE, 15 PROVIDE NEMA 3R MEDIA ENCLOSURE MOUNTED ON POLE OR GATE FOR POWER CONNECTION TO INTRUSION PANEL, ACCESS CONTROL POWER SUPPLY AND POE SWITCH FOR CAMERA AND FUTURE NETWORK DEVICES, CONNECT CIRCUIT SHOWN TO NEMA 3R ENCLOSURE. SEE CCTV CAMERA DETAIL E-708 FOR DETAILS. 18 PROVIDE (1) 1 it C.) (4} #10 CU CONDUCTORS FOR IRRIGATION BOOSTER PUMP. PROVIDE (1) 1 1" CONDUIT ONLY BETWEEN BOOSTER PUMP AND IRRIGATION CONTROLLER IN THE MAIN ELECTRIC ROOM. COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH LANDSCAPE PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. 17 SEE TRANSFORMER ON ENLARGED PLAN ON SHEET E103 FOR MORE INFORMATION. 11 1 1 1 1111111 19 � � 11 111 111,11m 0 8 16 32 64 96 ,.t 00 CD m Uj V_ 00 co cc < 00 Cq LLJ w Q0 < w ca LL Ct w 00 F- — 00 w w c) U) z < W Z 0 D 0 W _j LU 6021 12th Street East, Suite 200 Fife, Washington 98424 T: 253,922-0446 F: 253-922.0896 '111 jjjf���Irl 1: UL mftb.- 110 -8011 � I I Date: 06/21/2019 Job No.: 21739 D raw n By: JL Checked by: CT Revisions ._DATE DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 1 1/3211 if -Oil :D LAND USE m RESUBMITTAL m 06 SUBMITTAL121/2019 1 SHEET INDEX agg"m GENERAL C-505 FRONTAGE DETAILS RESUBMITTAL 06/21/2019 5 GOOO COVER SHEET AND INDEXRESUBMITTAL06/21/2019 FRONTAGE DETAIL G002 CODE COMPLIANCE C-507 FRONTAGE DETAILS G005 COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES r C-503 FRONTAGE DETAILS YYY��� j��/M�(\�j/�/M\/\� GOC�6 \/�j�/\j EXTERIOR ERIOR MATERIALS AND COLOR BOARD C-509 FRONTAGE RAMP DETAILS ....... C-510 FRONTAGE RAMP DETAILS C 511 FRONTAGE NOTES LA SURVEY C-600 CROSSINGS OVERALL 1 OF 5 SURVEY 1 OF 5 —601 CROSSINGS 2 OF 5 SURVEY 2 OF 5 C-602 CROSSINGS 3 OF 5 SURVEY 3 OF 5 C-603 CROSSINGS 4 OF 5 SURVEY 4 OF 5 C-604 CROSSINGS 5OF5 SURVEY 5OF5 LANDSCAPE CIVIL 5 L100OVERALL SITE PLAN RESUBMITTAL 06/21/2019 C 001 COVER SHEET RESUBMITTAL 06/21/2019 L101 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT C-100 TE SC AND DEMOLITION V O OVERALL L102 R E PLAN ENLARGEMENT SITE C-101 TESL AND DEMOLITION L103 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT RESUBMITTAL 06/21/2019 C_102 TSC AND DEMOLITION L104 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT C-103 TESL AND DEMOLITION L200 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN C-104 TESL AND DEMOLITION L201 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT C-105 TESL NOTES AND DETAILS C-00 GRADING AND DRAINAGE OVERALL L202 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT 0— 01 GRADING AND DRAINAGE L203 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT C-202 GRADING AND DRAINAGE L204 LANDSCAPE PLAN ENLARGEMENT C-203 GRADING AND DRAINAGE L LANDSCAPE LEGEND AND DETAILS RESUBMITTAL 06/21/2019 C-204 GRADING AND DRAINAGE L OVERALL TREE RETENTION PLAN C-205 GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS w L207 ENT TREE RETENTION PLAN ENLARGEMENT C 20 GRADING AND D RA ' INAGE DETAILS Lw.2.l TREE RETENTION PLAN ENLARGEMENT C 207 A GR DING AND DRAINAGE NOTES AND DETAILS I — � TREE RETENTION PLAN ENLARGEMENT C 20 GRADING I N G A G AND DRAINAGE DETAILS �w1 x Iw�� "'FREE RETENTION PLAN ENLARGEMENT C300A WATER COVER SHEET t L 211 _ TREE SURVEY DATA C300 WATER OVERALL.a C 301 WATER Lr TREE SURVEY DATA C-302 WATER L300 OVIIERALL IRRIGATION PLAN RESUBMITTAL 06/21/2019 C-303 WATER L3 ' 1 ENLARGEMENT IRRIGATION PLAN ENLARGEME 304 WATER L 3C) IRRIGATION ENT GATICN PLAN ENLARGEMENT C-305 WATER DETAILS L303 IRRIGATION PLAN ENLARGEMENT C-350A SEWER COVER SHEET L304 IRRIGATION PLAN ENLARGEMENT C-3 0 SEWER OVERALL L305 IRRIGATION LEGEND 1 E, — �/`C-3 L306 IRRIGATION DETAILS Il„3 /' IRRIGATION DETAILS C-353 SEWER L,,,� IRRIGATION DETAILS C.. 354 SEWER1441094 v 14 v v -55 SEWER DETAILS [.403 3 SITE DETAILS RESUBMITTAL 06/21/2019 C-400 PAVING OVERALL L404 SITE DETAILS C401 PAVING L405 SITE DETAILS r C-402 PAVING A003 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN RFU B MITTAL 06/21/2019 C-403 PAVING A004 ENLARGED VIEWS - SERVICE AREA C-404 PAVING A201 EXTERIOR. ELEVATIONS _ OVERALL. C-405 PAVING DETAILS � C„ 4 0 (i PAVING DETAILS) �G C1F ; FLN A ,L0V Iri�AIw+,I. I 1-1 "I'l N tNNt �LH r , I,, �� I� LAI ,L, AI IAG L r4. Lv.h war,x r �" CT R I CAL S PLA N R�.. �B�ITTAL C52 r „ �� .� � r,�„� GRADING �x 1 u{f w, DRAINAGE SOUTH � H ,� O H L� R 0 � O A � � � �I AKIN 503SOUTH 300TH ST FRONTAGE PAVING VL L I ` ICPLANS RESUBMITTAL IiT L 06/21/ 2019 9C C 504 FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT PLAN SOUTH O TH OF SITE DEMOPHASE, CONSTRUCTIONPHASE x. b' l r. 4 � t' i } , « , d t t )rt 1 4' 4 ti t t i , 3 � K,:00TH K �'.1^Y �f'� i m A lk Ar Anti ! .t ,r ,✓. i I } msms {, 1 { v, ti z 8 ., n.,. Y, ..eq.x,a" 'i+.. �'. ^t. tb o' x1: t +,� •'.1« y;. , vi 1 4.« INT 217' - - - - - - - - - - TY OF F DmEmmRAL WAY PROJ C #1'm9w=100173=m00v=UP r AR"CHITECTURE PROJECT TEAM t t FEDERAL WAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS SSC OWNER'S REP 1211 2 .:K � 33 ND ST �L H�ERY ,� r FEDERALAY, WA 98003 1420 5TH AVE,AV�SIT 1700 253.945.5937 SEATTL,,,,L WA 98101 CASEY MOORE EFiK ARCHITECTURAL y INTEGRUS ARCHITECTURE OCCI ^ 117 S MAIN STREET FORA CONSTRUCTION N .i"1,h o-+ L � kc w.... .• ,:� {{. 1 r R.. v a, Y £ r'N z^.+' i.. SUITE 100 10 ST AVE SOUTH, SUITE 400 �`:��E.~ew � � Ywv« SEATTLE, WA 98104 SEATTLE, WA 98134 206.628,3137 206.626.0256 k ( y 9 A JEFF GOU!LD � REBECCA BAIB K JJ 5q"' yy kRl, I �, # { r « �.{ Federal � {rar STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ,r �� INTEGRUS ARCHITECTURE BCC ENGINEERS 6021 12TH ST EAST SUITE 200 117 S MAIN STREET {. SUITE 100 FIFE, WA 98424 SEATTLE, WA 98104 253.922.0440 206.628.3137 H IAW F EE 9 TOM CORCORAN ,r q r w,r ;� _ « g �3, „ { ;7"�" Iy •;a.�r .. 4.�i ^."+^.�Y.^rr;„"r ELECTRICAL CIVIL BCE ENGINEERS At t„ .y„ F , LPD ENGINEERING PLC 6021 12TH ST EAST `. w r sA .;,':4w ='''i f y 1932 FIRST AVENUE SUITE 200 hax pN y z`�B z Y3 SUITE 201 FIFE, WA 98424 SEATTLE, WA 98101 253.922.0446 206.725.1211 MICHAEL COARTba:, JENNIFER ARGAVES FOOD SERVICE May LANDSCAPE STAFFORD DESIGN GROUP WEISMAN DESIGN CROUP 19528 12TH AVE ��.. 2329 E. MADISON STREET SEATTLE, WA 98155, ayr SEATTLE, WA 98122 253.269.4506 sxwss,aa ' 206,322.1732 TIM STAFFORD w NICK HAGEN COST ESTIMATOR x , b y X Y q ixzl a§ ACOUSTIC WT PARTNERSHIP.{ A3 ACOUSTICS, LLP 107 SPRING ST ,�?.r�,.fr a.,...,,+.i.w •.«� 1. 241 SOUTH LANDER ST, SUITE 200 SEATTLE, WA 98140 _ SEATTLE, WA 98134 206.70.4199 206-792-7796 STEVE KELLY If A P `t P ,�� F i 6'" c y Pt ,< ek "� ' 2 Y 9 I�j.:"� �Y MOHAMED AIT ALLAOUA 11 F w,a �Y #; �J 1, 1 SE I-- NON I + - „1 ON, t1 { r pj iq� k �u� a Ala 'x+.,A rl T/A/G U1LD/A/G Et t VA r/o/V 49 �Jr 411 '0� .UODE REVIEW PROJECT NAME.- WILDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT ADDRESS.- 2405 S 300TH ST. FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 PARCEL NUMBER.- 0421049167 LOT AREA: 408,593 SF ZONING: SINGLE FAMILY - 1 UNIT / 7.200 SQ FT - RS7.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7202150467 CODE TYPE CODE TITLE TECHNICAL BASIS ZONING FEDERAL WAY REVISED CODE FWRC - TITLE 19 BUILDING 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (INCLUDING WAC 51-50-1101, RCW APPENDICES E, J) 19.27 & 70.92 ACCESIBILITY ICC ANSI Al 17.1-2009 ACCESSIBLE & USABLE BUILDINGS & FACILITIES WAC 51-50 MECHANICAL 2015 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (IMC) w/ WASHINGTON STATE AMENDMENTS WAC 51-52 FIRE 2015 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (INCLUDING AMENDED CITY OF FEDERAL WAY NFPA 72, WAC 51-54A AND RCV APPENDIX B) & (INCLUDING APPENDICES C, E5 F3 1) 19.27 PLUMBING 2015 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE (EXCLUDING CHAPTER 12,15) WAC 51-56 & RCW 19.27 ELECTRICAL 2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE WAC 296-433 296-453 296-46B & RCW 19.28 ENERGY 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE WAC 51 -11 R 51 -11 and RCW 19.27 INDOOR AIR QUALITY WASHINGTON STATE VENTILATION & INDOOR AIR QUALITY CODE WAC 51-13 ELEVATOR ANSI/ASME Al 7-1 WAC 296-96 CIVIL WSDOT 2000 FIRE SPRINKLERS NFPA 13 FIRE ALARM NFPA72 (FWRC 19-200-090) F CLASSIFICATION REQUIRED PROPOSED SETBACKS FRONT(NORTH) 501 232' SIDE (EAST) 50' 286' SIDE (WEST) 501 85' REAR(SOUTH) 50' 1281 MAX BUILDING HEIGHT: 55'FOR GYMS .......... 301-81f 5 VERTICAL DISTAN(,,E FROM 30'FOR ALL OTHER STRUCT (JRFS 301-81f 5 AVERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION (SETBA ITIONAL TO HIGHEST POINT OF A FLAT i',",��PEC14. RF(,'.,`)*(JLATION AND NOTES 8-10,17 35'FROM WEST ROOF (ABUTTING YARD SETBACK INCREASE 51 FOR EVERY 11 STRUCTURE EXCEEDS 30, ABE) PROPE[o'Y LINE) (MINOR AND SUPPORTING STRUCTURES CONSTRUCTED AS A FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT OF SCHOOLS MAY EXCEED THE APPLICABLE HEIGHT LIMITATION, PROVIDED, THAT THE DIRECTOR DETERMINES THAT SUCH STRUCTURES WILL NOT SIGNIFICANLTLY IMPACT ADJACENT PROPERTIES) MAX LOT COVERAGE 75% MAX ..... ... . 1 �611 / 408,�,,)93 39�5% REQUIRED PARKING 1 PER EMPLOYEE 60 60 4 88' 489' I I '' 4VU' 00 w 0 0 0 -a 1-5 0) CN 493 f -4ff 4931.6ff A 'U''b0*4'E ANkmD 0CCUmmPAN&1u^Y CLASSIFICATION (SECTIONS 302, 303, & 304) GROUP(S): GROUP "Ell EDUCATION (ALL AREAS OTHER THAN BELOW, GYMNASIUMS, COMMONS AND KITCHEN INCLUDED IN IBC SECTION 303.1.3) GROUP 111311 BUSINESS (ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES) GROUP "A-311 ASSEMBLY Y 'mo'E P A RATION'4� (SECTION 508, 509) MIXED OCCUPANCY NO SEPARATION REQUIRED - INCIDENTAL USES (TABLE 509) - BOILER ROOM: 1 HOUR OR SPRINKLER REQUIRED (SPRINKLERS PROVIDED) '00% ldmmb�l 11 a (CHAPTER 6) UUN6TRUCTIUN TYPE m'.1magim spol-Immum - TYPE II-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED. EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE OF NONCUMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS, INTERIOR ELEMENTS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 601 AND SECTION 603 OF� THE CODE. AND AREAS TABLE 503 SECTION 504 & 5013) UILDIN H B E Gtim o ALLOWABLE VS. ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHTS & STORIES (TABLE 504.3 AND 504.4) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TO BE TYP II-B, EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM OCCUPANCY -------------- BASIC ALLOWABLE=� ACTUAL BUILDING ALLOWABLE BUILDING�, F­ACTUAL BUILDING J� BUILDING HEIGHT HEIGHT ABOVE OADE HEIGHT FLOORS HEIGHT FLOOR S 3 STORIES 30 FT. 0 1W 3 STORIES 1STORY 75 FT. J 30 FT. 0 IN# 4 STORIES — --------- ISTORY a V 1 0 L AVERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION (ABE) = AVERAGE OF HIGHEST & LOWEST PROPOSED OR EXISTING ELEVATIONS BUILDING ELEV = (HIGH + LOW/2) AVERAGE ELEV N1 = (493'-0" + 487)/2 = 490'-0" N2 = (493-4" + 493')/2 = 493'- 1 " El = (493-6" + 493')/2 = 493'-5" E2 = (493-6" + 492-2")/2 = 493'41 S1 = (493'-4" + 492'-9")/2 = 493'-1 11 S2 = (493+ 492-6")/2 = 492'-9" S3 = (493'-6" + 493)/2 = 493'-3" W1 = (493'+ 487')/2 = 490'-0" W2 = (493-4" + 493-4")/2 = 493-211 TOTAL 4143 1- 10" ABE = 4,431'-10"/9 = 4921,41' HIGHEST ROOF POINT 1.011 ---7523 w 00 BUILODING CY) 4931-411 i'�'4901-41ii 493'-0" HIGHEST ELEVATION 4871-011 LO FINISHED GRADE AVERAGE BUILDING ELEVATION LOWEST ELEVATION FIRE RESISTANCE REQUIREMENTS (SECTION 602, TABLE 6011 SEE SECTION 707- FIRE BARRIERS FOR RATED WALL/FLOOR ASSEMBLIES, EXITS, INCIDENTAL USE AREAS BUILDING ELEMENT FIRE RESISTANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION TYPE 11-B PRIMARY STRUCTURAL FRAME: 0 HOUR BEARING WALLS- EXTERIOR: 0 HOUR BEARING WALLS- INTERIOR: 0 HOUR NONBEARING- EXTERIOR WALLS/PARTITIONS: 0 HOUR (PER TABLE 602) NONBEARING- INTERIOR WALLS/PARTITIONS: OPENINGS IN EXTERIOR WALLS: 0 HOUR NOT REQlD (PER TABLE 705.8) FLOOR CONSTRUCTION & SECONDARY MEMBERS: 0 HOUR ROOF CONSTRUCTION & SECONDARY MEMBERS: 0 HOUR ROOF COVERING CLASS C FOR TYPE 1113 CONSTRUCTION INTERIOR WALLS & CEILING FINISHES, TABLE 803.9 - FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING, TYPE IIB EXIT ENCLOSURES & ROOMS & ENCLOSED GROUP PASSAGEWAYS CORRIDORS SPACES EDUCATION "Ell B C C ASSEMBLY "A-3,11 C BUSINESS 111311 B C C R E S S ,,.MEANS OF wounwAmm 111— 1, ROOMS, 1 11 iiiiii'l I OCCUPANT LOAD (TABLE 1004.1.2) -CORRIDOR WALLS (TABLE 1020.1) NOT RATED IN A FULLY SPRINKLERED BUILDING 20 NET CLASS, ROOM 7 NET GYM REQUIRED EGRESS WIDTH (SECTION 1005.3) 7 NET MULTI PURPOSE .20" PER OCCUPANT FOR STAIRWAYS (SECTION 1005.3.1) 50 NET LIBRARY, READING . 15" PER OCCUPANT REQUIRED FOR "OTHER" EGRESS COMPONENTS 100 NET LIBRARY, STACKS INCLUDING' DOORS, CORRIDORS, ETC. (SECTION 1005.1) 100 GROSS BUSINESS AREAS 200 GROSS KITCHEN REQU,IRED NUMBER OF EXITS (TABLE 1015.1, TABLE 1021.1, TABLE 1021.2) 300 GROSS STORAGE AREAS / MECHANICAL INDIVID()AL FLOOR - 2 REQUIRED FOR 499 OCCUPANTS PER FLOOR OFF 1 REQUIRED - COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL (SECTION 1006.2.1): CONFERENCE R 0 NDER 750 SQUARE FEET - 1 REQUIRED MAX. 100 FEET FOR GROUP 1113" OCCUPANCY STORAGE ROOMS - 1 REQUIRED MAX. 75 FEET FOR "E" OCCUPANCY MECHANICAL ROOMS - 2 REQUIRED (PER SECTION 1015.4) MAX� 75 FEET FOR "A-3" OCCUPANCY ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR ROOMS (PER NEC) - 2 REQUIRED ALL OTHER ROOMS - 1 REQUIRED - EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL (SECTION 1017.2)- WITH AUT OMATIC SPRINKLER MAX, 250 FEET FOR GROUP "E" OCCUPANCY - EXIT ACCESS DOORWAY F IGO RATION (SECTION 1015.2, EXCEPTION #2) MAX. 300 FEET FOR GROUP "B" OCCUPANCY WHERE A BUILDING IS EOUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN MAX. 250 FEET FOR GROUP "A-3" OCCUPANCY ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2, THE SEPARATION DISTANCE OF THE EXIT DOORS OR EXIT ACCESS DOORWAYS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1/3 OF THE LENGTH OF THE DEAD END��,,)� IN CORRIDORS (1020.4): MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE AREA SERVED MAX. 50 FEET FOR GROUP "B" & "E" OCCUPANCIES WHERE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS PROVIDED MAX. 20 FEET FOR GROUP "Al" OCC UPANCIES PLmumM_1_B G' IXTURE REQUIREMENTS WA STATE AMENDMENTS CHAPTER 50-51 WAC, TABLE 2902.1) REQD WATER CL0t04iETt40`i' REQ1D L A "V`A"I'"O R I E OCCUPANCY GROUP AREA OCCUPANTS WATER CLOSET # OF FIXTURES # OF FIXTURES LAVATORY FACTOR LAVATORIES LAVATORIES FACTOR REQUIRED PROVIDED REQUIRED PROVIDED 429 MALE 1 FIXTURE PER 125 4 4 3 3 7 7 1 FIXTURE PER 200 3 GROUPA3 6000 858 42.9 FEMALE 1 FIXTURE PER 65 SO FT 1 FAMILYASSISTED-USE 2 FAMILY/ASSISTED- 2 FAMILY/ASSISTED- TOILET ROOM PER 6 WCs USE TOILET ROOM USE TOILET ROOM 1 25 FOR FIRST 50$ 1 / 40 FOR FIRST 80 1 1 3$400 17 MALE 1 50 FOR REMAINDER 1 / 80 FOR REMAINDER GROUPB SO FT 34 "1 ­ 1 7 FEMALE 1 25 FOR FIRST 50, 1 / 40 FOR FIRST 80, 1 1 1 50 FOR REMAINDER 1 / 80 FOR REMAINDER 292 MALE 1 FIXTURE PER 35 9 14 1 PER 85 4 10 GROUP E** 58,500 585 SO FT 293 FEMALE 1 FIXTURE PER 25 12 17 1 PER 50 6 10 MALE 14 19 8 14 TOTAL FEMALE 20 25 10 14 34 44 18 28 * PER 1109.2.1 - FIXTURES WITHIN FAMILY/ASSISTED-USE TOILET ROOMS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN DETERMINING THE # OF FIXTURES PROVIDED. **E OCCUPANCY PER WA STATE AMENDMENT, TABLE 2902.1 FOOTNOTE E. - DRINKING FOUNTAINS (2902.5.1 WA STATE AMENDMENTS) (1) FOR FIRST 150 OCCUPANTS, ADDITIONAL (1) FOR EACH ADDITIONAL 500 OCCUPANTS TOTAL OF 1447 OCCUPANTS = 4 REQUIRED DRINKING FOUNTAINS. 8 TOTAL FOUNTAINS PROVIDED. CO m 00 m uj cz: 00 w _j Ljw w W X < U- C) cc (y) 'IQ w W 00 04 F_ <D w LIJ Cr_ F- C) U) z < W Z 0 M W _j w F- �7 77 0�o r A^ft Revisions # Date Description 5 5/6/2019 LAND USE RESUBMITTAL 1 AIL AHL m m Au11L 77777 IL iR is F S 00 F �RA'L y UB Cri up NOT TO SCALE PROJECT DAT "A" PROJECT ADDR[',)"S-. 2405 S 30011-1 �;;. FEDERAL WAY, WA 9800k) OWNER: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS I JURISDICTION: LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT FIRE PROTECTION AUTHOPITY. SOUTH KING FIRC [,�FSCUE ZONING: R S 7.2 LOT SIZE: 9.39 ACRES TAX I � D. NCB. 0421049167 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE GUARANTEE NUMBER 01 19605---­I`C, EFFECTIVE DATE MARCH 21, 2018): THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7202150467. CONTACTS OWNER. ARCHITECT: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INTEGRUS ARCHITECTURE 33330 8TH AVE S 117SMAIN ST, STE 100 FEDERAL WAY, WA SEATTLE, WA 98104 PHONE: (253) 945-2000 PHONE: (206) 628-3137 CIVIL ENGINEER: SURVEYOR: LPD ENGINEERING PLLC AHBL 1932 1 ST AVE, STE 201 1200 6TH AVE, STE 1620 SEATTLE, WA 98101 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE:(206) 725-1211 PHONE: (206) 267-2425 FAX. (206) 973-5344 FAX. (206) 267-2429 FEDERAL WAY CITY PUBLIC WORKS PRECONSTRUCTION INSPECTION NOTIFICATION PHONE NUMBER: 253) 835-2700 NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ........... . .. ... .. .. SHEET LIB I TABLE SHEET IN DESCRIPTON C-001 COVER SHEE'T C-1 00 . . ........ . .... . . ..... . TESL AND DEMO[J"I"ION OVERALL C_1O1 . ... ... ... .... ... "Ill.11,""I'll""-"-",ll,f1--l",",.... . ... . TESC AND DEMOLITION C-102 ISC AND DEMOLITION C-1 03 TESL AND DEMOLITION C-104 TESC AND DEMOLITION C-1 05 TESC N TI AND DETAR-S C— 200 0ADING AND DRAINAGE OVERALL C— 201 GRADING AND DRAINAGE C— 202 ry ma, GRADING AND DRAINAGE C— 203 GRADING AND DRAINAGE C— 204 GRADING AND DRAINAGE C-205 ("J ADIN(AND DRAINAGE DETAII...S C— 206 GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS C— 207 GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES AND DETAILS C— 208 01RADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS C— 300A .. ...... ..... .. (.'#0VCR SHEET C_ 300 ............ . ... . w11. I H[' OVERALL C_ 301 . . . .. . .... .. ........ I 11 L, I TI E S C— 302 U TI L 1 '11 F C_ 303 UTILITIES C— 304 UTILITIES C— 305 WATER AND SEWER DETAILS C— 306 .. ........ WATER AND SEWER NOTES C-400 PAViNG OVERALL C— 401 PAVING C— 402 PAVING C— 403 PAVING C— 404 PAVING C— 405 PAVING DETAILS C— 406 PAVING DETAILS C— 500 FRONTAGE OVERALL C-501 SOUTH 300TH ST FRONTAGE GRADING AND DRAINAGE C— 502 SOUTH 300TH ST FRONTAGE GRADING AND DRAINAGE C— 503 SOUTH 300TH ST FRONTAGE PAVING C— 504 FRONTAGE DETAILS C— 505 FRONTAGE DETAILS C— 506 FRONTAGE DETAILS C— 507 FRONTAGE DETAILS C— 508 FRONTAGE NOTES 4 Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: BP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019, ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019U/PERMIT L RESUBMITTAL #1 NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 'A �? ii� Y yr p L it Y 'UZ 'I 45 TR 7'e. i' I /A 'J4 ......... J V-717 I "7' If MITI Al" 104ro - C> 0o Giy co LLJ ('0 C%j W (1) x U- W CY) V- U) I 00 N Lu to W� cli (.0 Cl) N z <W z 0 a. 0 W _j Lu si Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: BIB Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 Z� 2 6/21/2019 LUIPERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 TEtimu AND NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. USE EXISTING DRIVEWAY �io CONSTRUCTION ACCESS PROVIDE ROCK STABILIZ CONSTRUCTION ENTRAN( NECESSARY TEMP FORCE MAIN (TYP) Z) INLET PROTECTION (TYP) C -10 r) d" 4000 NINO 010mm 40 4ummm 4mmmm so 4mumm 4mmm 4m 40000 4mmon so 40mom 4mum 40 40mm 4mmum 40 11mumm 401mmm 40 4mmm Mom 40 11010m MEMO 40 4NEW, favom 40 Mom Immmm MEMO 40 4 40 4iimm� A A C LIN S S PROPOSED BUILDING 006di 0111 ......... . . ...... Id LIDA =jL 19 Fun= 20 0 10 20 40 W-20' Scale 1 *am PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING OUTLINE BUILDING/STRUCTURE REMOVAL SAWCUT LINE ASPHALT REMOVAL CONCRETE REMOVAL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION FENCING SILT FENCE INTERCEPTOR SWALE TEMP FORCE MAIN EX TREE TO REMAIN 71\k EX TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE PROTECTION EX CURB TO BE REMOVED EX UTILITY TO BE REMOVED INLET PROTECTION df f'IR OUR/? LIMITS OF WORK SLOW-% LAtmu Ub'EMERM-1- • ny Yr 77 Date: 04/15/2019 Job No..- 21739 Drawn By.- C R L Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 14/15/2019 A *,DDENDUM 03 /21/4 2� 2019 Z6 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1, TEbU ANU NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 0 N CONSTRUCTION FENCING (TYP)C`� REMOVE EX ASPHALT (TYP) SILT FENCE (TYP) � c` o 0 0 4 f; e% now iNr„ e 1".207 17W PROPERTY LINE b xvhw°`xva+ xausy,,„t,.rw>*.-,y. EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR EX BUILDING io�kAA,k'+°n"° 3At'`fk+''""»sMu°1" v"d't" 4".Ywatu'a4iniwmt ) PROPOSED BUILDING OUTLINE BUILDING/STRUCTURE REMOVAL SAWC UT LINEASPHALT REMOVAL CONCRETE REMOVAL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION FENCING SILT FENCE INTERCEPTOR SWALE TEMP FORCE MAIN F EX TREE TO REMAIN EX TREE TO BE REMOVED 00 00 TREE PROTECTION EX CURB TO BE REMOVED EX UTILITY TO BE REMOVED INLET PROTECTION LIMITS OF WORK ° a t 1 ry f 1 0 i x = rc a ir .. ,^ , ,,, f t •...,,,*.�.�,_-t J i r , rY Y 4 r t d C „ p v � Y A H J / 'z,4 NO, XX—XXXXXX—XX a 41mom 40 some W L= 411111110 40 4000= 411111110 40 411111110 408=0 40 4nown 40 41ino1f +1D OPINION A C L I N =am S E Sh -I CGIUM104 APPROVED ©ATE LAND UOSE/PERMIT SUBMITTAL RESUO'BMI [T A LRI 'OftA 1 /^0 A 9 j/z I z 11 i • i i �+1 Nw i �M t � ININwNN «e �k aJf i sr Marc x Date. 0 /15/2019 Job o.: 21739 Drawn . CRL Checked by. SBP i Revisions i Date Description 1 /15/0 1 ADDENDUM 93 { /21 /201 LU/PERMIT ! RE UB ITTAL #1 T E (a ;*& /-\ N U r ul"k EM' � L I T 10' 4N T E (a ;*& /-\ N U r ul"k EM' � L I T 10' 4N NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. SEEM fmomm 40 OEM 419am fe momm 4mmm m OEM moon m Gmem mmmm m 4umm memo m ammm ommme ft Oman am= M Gomm WOOD OEM Qmmw� In I A 6 PROVIDE TEMP SUMP & C��O� PUMP I -J C, t� A, 44 �ij t -1 4 TEMP INTERCEPTOR SWALE C - 10, C�� �106 /ROCK CHECK DAMS @ 50) O.C. (TYP) 4"mmm Mono awammommummonum PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING OUTLINE BUILDING/STRUCTURE REMOVAL 0*0 SAWCUT LINE ASPHALT REMOVAL CONCRETE REMOVAL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 0"0 CONSTRUCTION FENCING ------ - SILT FENCE INTERCEPTOR SWALE TEMP FORCE MAIN EX TREE TO REMAIN /VA\1 EX TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE PROTECTION 4 4 EX CURB TO BE REMOVED EX UTILITY TO BE REMOVED INLET PROTECTION LIMITS OF WORK DATE LAND USEIPERMIT SU • 11 p !I V q 111F A N 7 Ulk Km Et" 'i U B Mm I T T 'Am L # 1 1 ulft Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT zl' RESUBMITTAL #1, I i Eau AINU 'e IN IT 1?p a Im INTERCEPTOR SWM W/ ROCK 1 C 0 CHECK DAMS @ 50' O.C. (TYP) qmmm 40 fmmmm Goo= 40"", miimml 40 arm= am= m MmL N MATCE I NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL S�E THIS BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, SHEET INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. :00 PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR EX BUILDING 11, PROPOSED BUILDING OUTLINE BUILDING/STRUCTURE REMOVAL SAWCUT LINE ASPHALT REMOVAL CONCRETE REMOVAL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CONSTRUCTION FENCING Aft. -AM 1W SILT FENCE INTERCEPTOR SALE *44 TEMP FORCE MAIN EX TREE TO REMAIN EX TREE TO BE REMOVED TREE PROTECTION EX CURB TO BE REMOVED EX UTILITY TO BE REMOVED X . ..... INLET PROTECTION alm"O LIMITS OF WORK C-101 C-102 Mumma Pll C-1030"mm=ummm ,C-104 K EY MAP 'Am L = R E S' U Es"M I TTA 6/21 /2`0 1 LQ "t 00 co co C14 W Lu W to < X Q) , < cc <:) U- CD co 00 ip- Lu (0 LL C> (D AW W Z 0 D 0 C/) uj _j W • Uil Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description A4/15/2019, ADDENDUM 03 Z2 6/21/42019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 98"m RAw#&% C A IL I l"ft #1 ft I U Tt:O PNIN 0 1 1 1 IL I ADAPTER 2 OP x2o' BY 14 Ga. WIRE SKIRT ',�_RETRIEVAL JOINTS IN FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE OR EQUIVALENT, IF ROCK MUST COMPLETELY COVER THE STRAP SPLICED AT POSTS, USE STAPLES, STANDARD STRENGTH z BOTTOM AND SIDES OF THE DITCH WIRE RINGS, OR EQUIVALENT TO FABRIC USED _j ATTACH FABRIC TO POSTS. z Cl- . . ................. I .......... METAL SUPPORT POST 6'-8' ON CENTER 6" MIN FILTER M SPACING, MIN 5' HT. FABRIC 2' MIN 2:1 SLOPES CROSS SECTION 2l$x-2$$ BY 14 Go. BARRICADE FENCING (ORANGE 0 AA WIRE OR CONSTRUCTION FENCE) MIN EQUIVALENT, IF 4' HT. SURROUND TREE OR LO STANDARD STRENGTH GROUP OF TREES AT DRIP FABRIC USED L OVERFLOW �U : �Fl LINE OR AS SHOWN ON POST A B AA (TO BYPASS PEAK PLANS BURIAL 2"- 4" QUARRY SPALLS, GEOTEXTILE u FLOWS) DEPTH FABRIC MINIMUM 4 x 4 41? 11 AA TRENCH 12" MIN L THE DISTANCE SUCH TH -III- ------- ------ --- NOTES: --- -------- l.A 4 FOOT HIGH TEMPORARY FENCE MUST BE PLACED AT THE DRIP LINE POINTS A & B ARE OF BACKFILL TRENCH E 11 UAL ELEVATION ------ OF TREES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CLEARING OR EARTHWORK. t - WITH NATIVE SOIL OR CHECK DAM SPACING ----- ------ 3/4"- 1.5" WASHED NOTIFY THE CLEARING AND GRADING INSPECTOR TO GET BOTH THE INSPECTION AND WRITTEN APPROVAL OF FLAGGED TREES AND TEMPORARY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS GRAVEL 2 x4" WOOD POSTS, '**��SEDIMENT ACCUMULATOR PROTECTION FENCING AROUND TREES TO BE SAVED PER THE APPROVED STEEL FENCE POSTS, AN 0. 5 FEET SHALL BE REMOVED SO THAT THE CHANNEL (MIN. 0.5 CF STORAGE) CLEARING AND GRADING PLAN. 1. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITION OF MORE TH REBAR, OR IS RESTORED TO ITS DESIGN CAPACITY. SCHEMATIC DETAIL EQUIVALENT 2.NO STOCKPILING OF MATERIAL AND NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ARE ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRIPLINE, THE TEMPORARY FENCING, UNLESS 2t IF THE CHANNEL CAPACITY IS INSUFFICIENT FOR THE DESIGN STORM, IT MUST BE DETERMINED WHETHER THE PROVIDE "STREAMGUARD SEDIMENT CATCH BASIN INSERT" OR APPROVED BY THE ARBORIST. FILLING, EXCAVATION, AND CLEARING MUST PROBLEM IS LOCAL (E.G., A CONSTRICTION OR BEND) OR THE CHANNEL IS UNDERDESIGNED. IF THE PROBLEM IS 6 AX MINIMUM BE ACCOMPLISHED BY HAND METHODS ONLY UNLESS APPROVED BY LOCAL, THE CHANNEL CAPACITY MUST BE INCREASED THROUGH CONSTRUCTION OF A BERM(S) OR BY EXCAVATION. APPROVED EQUAL POST SPACING MAY BE 4 $1 x4$f ARBORIST. IF THE PROBLEM IS UNDERDESIGN, THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND THE CHANNEL REDESIGNED TO MANUFACTURER INFORMATION: INCREASED TO 8' IF WIRE TRENCH IROOTS OF TREES TO BE SAVED WHICH ARE DAMAGED DURING A MORE CONSERVATIVE STANDARD TO BE APPROVED BY KING COUNTY. BOWHEAD ENVIRONMENTAL & SAFETY BACKING IS USED CONSTRUCTION MUST BE TREATED IN THE FOLLOWING WAY: FOR DAMAGED 3. THE CHANNEL SHALL BE EXAMINED FOR SIGNS OF SCOURING AND EROSION OF THE BED AND BANKS. IF P.O. BOX 375 f$ ROOTS OVER 1" IN DIAMETER, MAKE A CLEAN, STRAIGHT CUT TO REMOVE SCOURING OR EROSION HAS OCCURRED, AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY QUARRY SPALLS OR AN PRESTON, WA 98050 2 x4" WOOD POSTS, THE DAMAGED PORTION OF THE ROOT ALL EXPOSED ROOTS WILL BE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR NET. (800) 909-3677 STEEL FENCE POSTS, TEMPORARILY COVERED WITH DAMP I BURLAP OR WOOD SHAVINGS TO WWW.SHOPBOWHEAD.COM REBAR, OR PREVENT DRYING AND COVERED WITH EARTH AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. EQUIVALENT NTS NTS NTS NITS ROCK CHECK DAM INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCING PROVIDE SOLID COVER RUNOFF WITH SEDIMENT TOP OF SEDIMENT TRAP FM FOR DISCHARGE OF EL XXX ACCEPTABLE SEDIMENT FREE STORMWATER TO APPROVED 1 ­�5/8" O.D. OUTLET PER PLAN MOVABLE SUMP & PUMP 0 G A [.,VA N I Z E D GRASS OR ROCK STRETCHER BAR (TYP) "S"ADDLE CLAMP (TYP) �,1_�ZZZZZZZ_ZZZ.1 2771 > 0 LEVEL BOTTOM JL X X X A A L0 FILTERED 0 RUNOFF > U PROVIDE 6" MIN CLEAN > < > GRAVEL AROUND WATER SURFACE > PERIMETER > < 0 0 0 0 2 T C) 0 0 0 < C) 0 t3. 0 CL < 2' MIN. 1 MIN, CONTRACTOR 0 0 0 0 Lu 90 > < z > SHALL INCREASE 0 0 0 0 WRAP WITH V DEPTH IF NECESSARY -8,;, 1 XXX Z� f > < /Z > FILTER FABRIC 0 0 0 0 Xj J0 24'$ DIAMETER OR 4 GREATER PIPE OR DRUM NOTES: X/ "X�// V, \X// X�\ �\�/ X/ A (MUST BE OF NON N, u, x u a/ LEACHABLE MATERIAL) W/ GRADE- MAX 5% WITH POSITIVE DRAINAGE TO A SUITABLE REMOVE SEDIMENTATION AFFER OUTLET SUCH AS A SETTLEMENT TRAP 2"DIA WEEP HOLES SITE IS STABILIZED & T.E.S.C. V UGE MIN CONCRET K -2 2" MESH, 11 GA STABILIZATION: SEED, COVER MEASURES, OR ROCK 12" THICK, PRESSED < E BLDC MEASURES ARE REMOVED. 1)00e' MIN 80 M`3 PROVIDE SECURE ATTACHMENT A - INTO SWALE BANK AND EXTENDING AT LEAST 8" VERTICAL EXCAVATE BIORETIENTION POND WIRE TIES AROUND ENTIRE FENCE PANEL FROM THE BOTTOM. AS REQUIRED. Ix WATER LEVEL SUMP PUMP AND MOTOR N' W/CAPACITY AS NECESSARY BLOCKS AS NECESSARY NTS NTS NTS NTS CONSTRUCTION" FENCIN'V TEMPORARY' SUMP AND PUMP TEMPORARYf INTERCEPTOR SWALE WITH' ROCK CHECK" DAMS S"E D I M E N T T RA P' GENERAL EROSION AN S DIMENTATIO'N" CONTROL NOTES Cu"NSTR'u'mC I ION SEOU'ENCE 1. APPROVAL OF THIS EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN 10. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN ONE FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN A 1. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY, A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD OR DRAINAGE DESIGN (I.E. SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE LINES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. HELD BETWEEN THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, THE APPLICANT AND APPLICANT)S CONSTRUCTION THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM REPRESENTATIVE. RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES, UTILITIES, ETC.). SYSTEM. 2. FLAG CLEARING LIMITS. 2. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE ESC PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT, 60 AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR 11. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND WASH PADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING 3. INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED. 4. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FENCE AS INDICATED ON PLAN. C 0" < MAY BE REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT ALL PAVED AREAS ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF 6. 0 Q�. 0 0 a rS 0 3. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE PROJECT. 5. INSTALL OFFSITE CATCH BASIN PROTECTION. THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, NO DISTURBANCE 12. WET SEASON REQUIREMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN APPENDIX D, SECTION D.2.4.2 OF THE KCSWDM 6. CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT TRAP/POND. INSTALL SETTLING TANKS AND PUMPS. <D BEYOND THE FLAGGED CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE FLAGGING SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. ARE IN EFFECT BEGINNING OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRIL 30. 7. CLEAR AND GRUB AREAS OF THE SITE TO BE ROUGH GRADED OR FILLED. 13. ANY PERMANENT RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN SHALL BE 4. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL MODIFIED WITH THE NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE 8. INSTALL INTERCEPTOR SWALES/BERMS AND CHECK DAMS. CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES, AND IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT SEDIMENT LADEN STORAGE CAPACITY. IF THE PERMANENT FACILITY IS TO FUNCTION ULTIMATELY AS AN INFILTRATION WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR VIOLATE APPLICABLE WATER STANDARDS. 9. ROUGH GRADE SITE AND INSTALL STORM CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AND RETENTION/DETENTION OR DISPERSION SYSTEM, THE FACILITY SHALL NOT BE USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN. NO 25'R OR R=AS NOTED FACILITIES. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION WHERE INDICATED. 5. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED UNDERGROUND DETENTION TANKS OR VAULTS SHALL BE USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN. 10. INSTALL REMAINING UTILITIES AND BUILDING. 12" MIN. DEPTH SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED 14. WHERE SEEDING FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED, FAST GERMINATING GRASSES 11 . FINISH GRADE SITE AND CONSTRUCT ASPHALT PARKING AREAS, ACCESS DRIVES, SIDEWALKS, CURBS 171 C 1111 (I.E. ADDITIONAL SUMPS, RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES, ETC.) AS NEEDED FOR SHALL BE APPLIED AT AN APPROPRIATE RATE (I.E. ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL RYE APPLIED AT 3L.10- I- 0111�11( UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS. APPROXIMATELY 80 POUNDS PER ACRE). AND GUTTERS. FABRIC 6. THE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR AND MAINTAINED 12. COMPLETE SITE STABILIZATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE PLANS. 4" 8" QUARRY AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. 15. WHERE STRAW MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED, IT SHALL BE APPLIED AT 13. CLEAN STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM, ON AND OFF SITE, OF ALL SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS. SPALLS 7. ANY AREA STRIPPED OF VEGETATION, INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS, WHERE NO FURTHER A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF TWO INCHES. 14. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES WHEN SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED. NTS WORK IS ANTICIPATED OR A PERIOD OF 2 DAYS (WET SEASON) OR 7 DAYS (DRY SEASON), SHALL 16. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROVIDING SIGNIFICANT TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED PER `CwUN� CTIO T R A N ('a"T SECTION 19.120 OF FWRC. BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH THE APPROVED ESC METHODS (I.E. SEEDING, MULCHING, NETTING, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.) PERMIT NO., XX-XXXXXX-XX 8. ANY AREA NEEDING ESC MEASURES, NOT REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION, SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 15 DAYS. 9. THE ESC FACILITIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN THE 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT. NTS NTS APPROVED L z L 0 UN b *TRU^TI'0"'&" "EQUENIL LC0 N C GENERAL EROSION AND SEDI'M'E"'N'TATIO"'N'COLNTROL NOTES DAT LAND USE/PERMIT SUBMITTALm RESUBMITTAL - 6/21/2019 mqt 00 144, CC 00 (0 uj (0 _j co C*4 to am Cn z LU z 0 �_:r DCL 0 (/)UJ _j 77 4Q 40 4m 40 Alm 777 Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by* SBP Revisions # Date Description zi� 4/15/2019' ADDENDUM 0 3 6/21/',2019'LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 TESC NOTE AND DETAIL NGVB 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 29TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90) MuwM gYyy�yyy j , a 1 rL—, rizmm al + 1 I; ul ,1 wr � 1 ;o i 1 r f { . i SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR ,,UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION ,x. APPROVED w 0, DATE Na NEW AND REPLACED IMPERVIOUS AREA QUANTITIES (FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY) ONSITE: 161,611 SF (3.71 AC) OFFSITE 7,267 SF (0. 17 AC) EARTHWORK QUANTITIES (FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY) CUT: 281259CY FILL: 15,590 CY Nt 00 rv_ao V_ M 1 Q cd c*) C/) uj a� W(0 IL Wm � ce) U) , 00 " C'V F_ W /—�` `0 CD�/�yy /(J VN AN < W Q QW �- W r. ilk `28977 JS • .y M � M E` IgIIM 111111111111111111 �r r r' ,' < k` F i Clete. 04/15/ 019 Job No.. 21739 Drawn By. CRL Checked by. SBP Revisions # Cute Description /15/ZC 1 ADDENDUM 93 2 /21 /2919 LU/PERMIT RE UB ITTAL 1 RAM I A"% A Ik 9 u INA3 MIN a ` Li 'AOP%E "%RAI NL tj ll '0`LVEPR&/_%LL NGVD 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90' P 15 LF 12" SD --"TC 491.60 % TP 491.10 @ 1.0 :,,000, 4 4,9 . .M.ww. 4 4 0 5 _4a+ RIM lctzlv.luv 7, - I L i r l+w.yu Ajo It U 4. 1- 1 89.20 4 IE 483.18 (81f W) IN S IE 482. tmmfm ummtm to rawUu 67 (8" SW) IN fm to em mm fim 004'" m mm mm SH J. U-0 fm m m m Im mm 00 a* ON W, to V41j, P.11 On, fmIlm 491.11, 491.20 U TC FLU, 4 Ao IE 481.67 (12" N) OUT TP 49 0.85 rg MATCHLINE —SEE SHEET C-203 NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. . . . . ..... . . PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR 230 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR xxx.x ~,, SPOT ELEVATION FF 78.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING 4 4 1 < 4 ILI CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0a70 0 0 0 0 Q 0 q 0 6 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT 90 0 AP 4 0 0 �0� 0 00 Q, 0 0 0 f) 1­0­0 4 6 0 " * 0 0 "0, HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT �_ SAC) PAVEMENT GRIND AND OVERLAY GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL _ .... ..... VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER •1,. Nil PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER tf QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN sl"Ni CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 um CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETENTION FACILITY SDCO STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FDCO FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DS DOWNSPOUTS . ..... SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE . ...... FIRE SERVICE VAULT ................ FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION SD#YARD DRAIN RIM 492.40 C 0 IE 489.14 (6f) N) IN IE 489.14 (6)) N) OUT C-201 C-202 SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR 1UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION C-203 C-204 APPROVED mum, J DATE ..... ...... KEY MAP LAND USEIPERMIT co CC ZZ) 00 (0 LW W to C-4 77 W U) x < mommmamplip- C:� LL ul 01 Ah4\\qk0 28977 SIONAL Ah MU11 • ilk t `0! jhf 0' �X 7 iw Date: 04/15/2019 Job No., 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by, SBP Revisions # Dale Description Z 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 1019 6/21 /2" LU/PERMIT zn2 RESUBMITTAL #1 e% A (31"' RA "um"' 11`41 U A lm*ql U Dall 1% 1 U k 777771 NGVD 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90' CONNECT TO TC 492.00 STORMTECH BASIN TP 491.50 IE 480.75 TC 492.50 TP 92.00- 92 LF 12 SD 492.64 TC 492.50 4 TP 492.00 4 TO 491.00 TC 49 TC 491.50 T 92.0 GS 491.00 4 SD#23 YARD DRAIN TC 492.50\ C RIM 488.56 /01 TP 492.00 IE 485.9 8 0 PERT) IN IE 485.22 8" NW) OUT ............. 492.75 JT t, 4 492.60 492.04 4 4. ppH.H. 46 LF 8" SD @ 1.0% NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 1113111 111 11 IN 489.50 490- 490 1 v• v w v s w w , ,� e, j V 8 ' y. g � ..... j '�' .. � '? TC 491.50 GS 491.00 v'6""60 Arl umam204 SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................ PROPERTY LINE ------ EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR 230 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR xxx.x SPOT ELEVATION FF 78.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING 'j PROPOSED BUILDING 4 4 4 CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 04 0<0 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT GRIND AND OVERLAY GRAVEL SURFACING 7 7 i, 77' n 7 727 SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB ....... ... . CURB AND GUTTER PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN l CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETENTION FACILITY SDCO- STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FDCO FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DS DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION S S M H BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS j, WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE ............ . .... FIRE SERVICE VAULT aK FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION -40% RAD I 11\11u" AIN r% r"& 103%k L I'll umAINAGE C) CY) 4m ce) co C14 UJ (0 C) C-4 < Lu U) x u- Lu CY) 00 C14 Lu ( (0 C> 17) C*4 z W z 0 0 CL 0 UJ -j Lu • rr r. r �. IA 7 l4 Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: B Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 A2 6/21/2019 , LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 1"T tviuiNwiviri)4i iiNi u/-\z)r- mi ur zuin mvc 1) (x 3 GZ7U i rl 3 1 PUBLISHED ELEVATION.- 508.90 t lc� ki 7_ 14mom lk , iV 41 I 17, A- j, vA 2 5 5 LF 6" SD _100,i @ 0.6% �J Itl "A A, I A Nj 1A VO J A, A_ "'d NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. E M MA'TC'm'LlNE SE SHE T C===201' 10 W OEM 4611= ft 0 = ft WM= GN!W mmn�o amm fawn M am 1= ==0 40 M come =MW M Gomm =now am= MEM amm mono 40 unwo ==no (a amr Gomm W come YARD DRAIN 8D#X2 b�Z�20RIM 492.00 IE 489.26 (61) S) OUT 144 LF 6#$ SD 45 LF 6$$ SD .0% 7 8D#21 8DC0 I @ 1.0% @ 1 I C,-Z &0 6 RIM 492.95f. . ........ FF 493.0 IE 488.62 (6" S) OUT DOWNSPOUT FDCO 492.97 492.97 492.63 33 49 2.9 7 1� 492j... 2 7 �c CONNECTION (TYP) C.Z.20 Fl) 0- 'q P, IMM4M k7 , t� /1, 492.97 4 4 77�� b� 492.49 17 LF 6 SD t, Nor__ @ 1.0% ✓492.83 IN 492.69 4 ,",492.88 t�- 492.97 492.37 4 DO YARD DRAIN 48 LF 6fp SD b. 4 92.81 492 82 @ 1.0% 49 .75 -20 0� �4 RIM 492.40 4 11 04 IE 489.91 (61) N) IN 492.70 49i65-""'ll': .5 I E 489.91 (6" S) OUT 24 LF 61$ SD 492.54 0 60 "' " "" "­ "", 1:I, ­",� � �' ", " " i's 4 4 492.50 t,, \\, " " D. 492.78 @ 1 .0% Gp 20 LF 8ti ff SD rim 492, 7 t', 0 �"492.75`,. @ 1.0% 492.4 492.97 97 LF 8" SD y 92.60 Q2.37 @ M A j SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR iUTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR 230 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR xxx.x SPOT ELEVATION now 0% 7 8.0 FINSHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING Z Z PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT 4 A�du0 1* P 0,4 0 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT 0# 0 0 90 0) 20 Q ro 0 0 HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT -777. GRIND AND OVERLAY GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER Ell Nt,Ya. PRE -SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD f AREA/YARD DRAIN 0 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 um CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETENTION FACILITY SDCO STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FDCO o FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DS DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH . . . ... ................................. BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS T WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION A-13M KmEbjw4U"lw4T*jflTTP`AL 01A/ 011 1 1011k All, 1 OR u 194. co CD co cn ch co C>U- cr_ a co uj(D Ism Im z <LLj Z F_ x CL 0 LU _j Arl Lu V_ 28977 q IONAL ifi t. LLM 77� 7,1 7 Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: C R L Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019, ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019, LU/PERMIT ZI RESUBMITTAL #1 'Ask, 40MM 40 42� 4D bu#zo. %ou i T rc z RIM 492.78 IE 487.30 6)) N) IN 8 Jr IE 487.30 8" S IN C-20 IE 487.30 8 " E) OUT SD#2 CB TYPE RIM 492.55 IE 489.55 (6" W) OUT 6 492.97 88 LF 810 SD @ 0.5% 492.97 Da 21 LF 61$ SD rr @ 9.8% 49 2.9 7 492.9 —492— ........... . INN . a SD#27 YARD DRAIN 500).b4 #., RIM 489.75 IE 487.08 (8" PERF) OUT ny \�C 0 ­2,1 'Z N", "A NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) WILL BE APPROVED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. HLIMATCNE —SEE SHT Commom*202 I qW ToNow REMINOW W, 4111 IN IF mragnmmw mummwmw 411 1 1 4EMW M W P; V 77� J, ARA z. SD#3zl kow Typt I (�6 C 20 RIM 490.80 C-20 Ll IE 487.80 (12)" S) IN IE 487.80 (12" NW) OUT 2 SD#252 CB TYPE 1 6 RIM 492.50 t,�ZZZ �2O IE 489.50 (6)" W) OUT 33 LF 12" SD @ 3.3% SD#38 YARD DRAIN tir' V SZ ,;'1 7' i 11 1" �j RIM 491.54 CZ,2 IE 488.88 (8 PERF) IN IE 488.88 (12" N) OUT 7 "A lillmmm ME= 40 mom 4* 400M 4D 40MEM 4NEW 40 1 1 D# 8 DISPERSION TRENCH FG 491.99 % I PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR 230 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR xxx.x SPOT ELEVATION FF 78.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING 4 4 CONCRETE PAVEMENT ei ,4 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT A ti 01 ry o HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT u, _4­1 4 a 0, (AC) GRIND AND OVERLAY GRAVEL SURFACING !i,:, 77777777777777 77 SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER °; y PRE -SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 NINON IN I STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETENTION FACILITY SDCO STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FDCO FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DS DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH L A R, Dir ­100- FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS J, WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER '� WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE jj FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION I 1"ir r, 1'XQ V r_ u I 17f ao co 00 C14 (0 UJ to _j C) U.1 Cn C:> LL U.1 M CV) 04 400 Lu to to Cn C14 z W Z 0 0 CL 0 (n uj _j Lu 4 4 400 4M Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.. 21739 Drawn By. CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT Zj, RESUBMITTAL #1 A100% A IL A ('03 FRA UP"" IN I-x IN rm% NOW% ft I ��` KA 11`41 A ROUND DRAIN APPROVED EQUAL �. 44 a. 4► +ii i. w °M� 3 BAR EACH SCORNER 3 BAR EACH SIDE AIV1 t""1n1 AC**T• ni InTII E° IDnNI ATE sr v FRAME AND � [ Alf v ~ 6 " FIBER SECTION « t #{ 4' J Yf eloo 12" RISER SECTION w *P I I " I I I I PRECAST BASE SECTION I * I I (MEASUREMEW AT THE TOP F THE:BASE) I I 14 * *y n Y # M*Y qy 3 BAR EACH 'SAY t P a f PUBLIC i wWORKS t e � , 1/" @ 4"0DS 41$0 ROOF DS - SEE ARCH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PIPE CAP W/HOLE CUT 1 /8" LARGER IN DIAMETER THAN DOWNSPOUT PIPE IT FILLER TYP ALL AROUND WHEN CONCRETE IS PRESENT) 10(TYP) ;� STORK DRAIN C LEAN O UT FLUSH 7 W/ FINISHED GRAD �' PLASTIC VALVE BOX W / 8 DIA LID FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS OR STD CAST IRON COVER FOR PAVED 1 2 AREAS 1 L1 tD SURFACING PER PLAN a 8" 4 0 1 8) BEND 8 " STORM DRAIN TEE FOOTING DRAIN ISLOPE PER PLAN 6 —45° (1/8) BEND MS DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION xn s }: CATCH BASIN TYPE NTS Ku 'I" . TY`E I FAINUA CAgm AOH B"A" IN GRADING NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OVER —EXCAVATION FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS/ SLABS AND PAVEMENTS PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS AND FOUNDATION EXCAVATION PLAN. FLOOR AND CAPILLARY BREAK PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SLOPE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING PROPOSED GRADE PER PLAN CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OF WASHED ROCK BACKFILL PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FINAL FILL LAYERS VARIES 41 /,��i,�i,,;,,,,r FILL AS R EQ MINA`'°` fi` /` �,�j��,,�., r�`j�`�,�,,,�`; �`,, 4NAll r , y - » M r , ..µ' FOOTING DRAIN ° 1 , M IA I P TOP SHALL BE +lob MIN OF 4 r BELOW TOP OF r / 1 FOOTING BUILDING FOOTING WALL PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. SEAT MALLS WASHED ROCK PER LA UKAWINGS. DO NOT DISTURB FOOTING FOOTING DRAIN PLACED LEVEL OR BEARING ZONE WHEN WITH POSITIVE SLOPE TO OUTLET INSTALLING FOOTING DRAIN NTS NTS GRADING NOTES � FOUTING DRAIN NOTES: 1. CATCH BASINS fF IALI_ BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ATM SH I'T M 199) AND ASTM C890 UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON „ . P t,AI *,,,)* OR NOTFD IN THE WSDOT APWA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2'. TAi 40H, LT.)S 04 ADJUSTMENT SECTION SHALL HAVE 3MIN. LEA.FuA cE. STLPS IN CATCH BASIN SHALL HAVE 6" MIN. CLEARANCE. SEE DWG. NO, 20c6, CATION BASIN DETAILS. HANDHOLDS SHALL BE PLACED . * .K•`.: P air.. IN ALTERNATING GRADE RINGS OR LEVELING BRICK COURSE WITH .. • MIN. OF ONE HASP DHOL»i BETWEEN THE T STEP ANDANDTOP OF THE * > HANDHOLDS" �r . w SECTION �I IL.N�I *�L. i'IiN MANHOLE. ,p„ y., TOP SLAB CC e ,P, ♦ P � ���•j p yy yir« 5J" ���yG, '.*'"�� �wLINQ �;a1*r1�r11 Iv-�a/ VINGS OPTIONAL). .�. ..» REINFORCED CAST IN I�L�tCE CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS �"C�it�. AL"�, .ILL;.,... 3. . CT CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 4000. ALL PRECAST #rKr ♦ ♦*#+",44sv•° to x .. ♦•Y axr�o • ♦ ". "♦ "..... •. 4. PRECAST CASES , HALL BE FURNISHED WITHCUTOUTS OR P aw d.} jA 4 KNOCKOUTS. « KNOCKOUTS SHALL HAVE WALL THICKNESS OF 2 • . , MIN, I«%NLJSEI KNOCKOUTS G NEED NtT, �E RC3LITEC IF . ° •'.:. « 24" DIAM .• WALL. IS LEFT INTACT. PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED ONLY IN FACTORY KNOCKOUTS UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED RCJVED BY THE v. STEP, OR LADDER, ORIENT ENGINEER. �• .• . ; '.. r#af �'x INLET SO PS WILL 5« KNOCKOUT OR CUTOUT HOLE SIDE SHALL EQUAL PIPE OUTER r^* a " " `�," "' r,� PIPES. �; I�v�« NC>« +. DIAM. PLUS CATCH IN WALL THICKNESS. MAX, HHOLEpr,° sm r �$'+�{�"` J t�F� ♦: SIZE SHALL BE 36a► FOR 48isr CATCH IN, 42�� FOR 5 C.B., 4 8FOR C«E3.FOR 7� C.B.FOR9C.B. MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES SHALL BE 8 FOR 4811, 54, AND 60 II v i r ♦.x ^ I CMBM, 120 FOR " NIA " C.B. I I r 1 CATCH BASIN FRAMES AND GRATES OR COVERS SHALL BE IN W I 1 ACCORDANCE WITH SEC. 7.05 OF K.C,I #SY AND MEET THE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL SPECIFICATION RR -F— 21 D. MATING SURFACES SHALL BE FINISHED TO ASSURE NON —ROCKING FIT WITH ANY COVER POSITION. a*, 1 py i1 DIAI�I* ?. ALL BASE REINFORCING STEEL SHALL HAVE A MIN. YIELD 10 , * , �I z sy jy" 0" Y 88" DIAM.- � STRENGTH OF EIC,CC0 PSI AND BE PLACED IN THE UPPER HALF "I 4� , ; 4r w MORTARMORTAR.+ DIAIIh_* ~ PRECAST , OF THE EASE WITH MIN. CLEARANCE. # FILL� ,+ a, . �• INTEGRAL RISER. , ..•• 8« MIN. SOIL BEARING VALUE SHALL EQUAL 3,300 POUNDS PER *�.,� ,,. ,.. P* "P :.,, P ,' :. w_" ,.•. . *. «� `•. YP ,gaw #••qp p x s.. •« x Y ,,. y +,:w Y j, j " jry�*y »" " " (y " j 1 `*"0 FOR 48 4 5 4 K�5 � 4w+ r SQUARE FOOT. V.11P`rt r ,u « �•:• w R .�. » < ,*« *� +~,•.. +. * µ 2'-Om2'—Om FOR 72 & 96 Li' « FC*I HC�ININC LADDER, STEPS, HANDRAILSAND TOP , i�0Ci0CF0sa0;00 Ci opo or,0,ii°000 Ca0�al0000� do 0 000 �CyiE�"AIL S�*E. ii1��d"C« NI�i« -"4. MIN. 10. SEE THE WSDOT/APWrA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SEC. SEPARATE CAST IN PLACE 7-05«3 FOR JOINT REQUIREME « *FORE OR SEPARATE SEPARATEE PRE E. CAS GRAVEL FILL FOR FOUNpATIC►Ma 5* MIN. COMPACTED DEPTH --Ihi--PLAC ONL+q� FOR PRECAST ELASE ONLY. REINFORCING STEEL (FOR SEPARATE BASES ONLY REINFORCING STEEL (FOR PRECAST BASE & INTEGRAL RISER ONLY) G1..2� :GQ� INK,%FT, I H I� IREC71ON FOR 48 D 0.15 . IN./FT. FT. IN H DIRECTION FOR 4R D . ,� 0.19 SO. IN./FT. IN H DIRE ON FOR 54* D . 0.19 . IN«%'FT. IN H DIRECTION FOR 54* D a 0. • IliVFT. IN H DIRECTION FOR SO D . 0.25 Sty, IN./FT. IN H DIRECTION FOR 1 4 DIAM. 0.35 'SO. IN./FT. IN EACH DIRECTION FOR 724' DIAM, 0«24 SO, IN,/FT, IN EACH DIRECT10N FOR 72" DIAM. FOR 9S* DAM. Q«.�9 O. 1N.,�FT, IN H DIRECTION R t� 0.29 " . IN. Fr. IN H DIRECTION FOR '0 D . ''Pa•r fw ,� •'q P, �p "0" RING /1' "�°p+ # *�*Pw* 'R ''a'S# + • rtl. +11'b "°,Ii° •. "«,y JULY 9014 C �e PUBLIC r ftd(BTR� WORKS -------------- ,..� .. ae r.... lrr"."�....:. ., rta. ,m.... .. ,.: ,:',e a., ,)4'.: .,r t. �;.t, ",,.`,°�4'. 'Y:X .''✓1,'" .,fu CATCHO BA RET(48"s + 9 2 N 90"ll) NTS ljK lu B to -041"W"D "ATCH 1 PYPE SIP .1s 2 IN I U P E '"' M I T XX—XXXA"XX Xx • 41♦ M w 4M } .I► f i �4t 1 t t t•. 77 f i -•�QIIIII�IIII�I� Date: 04/15/2019 Job No..- 21739 Drawn y: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions Date Description 1 / 1 /2 a 1 ADDENDUM 93 2 /21 /2919 LU/PERMIT B T A 1' REU MI T' L ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ALL AROUND CLEAN, CRUSHED, ANGULAR STONE IN A & B LAYERS Nx PERIMETER STONE (SEE NOTE 4) EXCAVATION WALL (CAN BE SLOPED OR VERTICAL) -III d 1l:l:_l_.i 1=1 I I— —III—I —III—III I I —III —I II —III —III =III —III —I _ ;III — III —I 1= 11=1 I I -=III i 1=1 I I I I I III-1 I I-1 I I-1 _III-1 I I-1 —III—III III I I 1HEI I M I 1 I I— III � Ml I M 1 _I M I I —III - El I1EE16" (150 mm) MINi�, I 1EE_ IIMII—IIM MC-3500 END CAP SUBGRADE SOILS (SEE NOTE 3) MyOOD COVER RIM EL PER PLAN a 12" DIA RISER FRAME LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET OVERFI...OW y. SEE NOTE 8. z EL 485.50 o w i N J n. T si PIPE SUPPORTS (2 MIN.): W• . SHEAR MATE 3tf x .090" ALUMINUM d W/ 5/8" STAINLESS BOLTS EL 483.00 1.25 ORIFICES W ELBOW f 24" INLET 1-Uif PIPE MIN. a 1 OUTLET PIPE b 110 .b z IE 480.92 IE 480.00 <a ., A EL 478.00 tl 4 C� d 1.35" ORIFICE 'd 9 54" MIN. CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 DIAM. AS RE UIRED NOT TO SCALE CONTROL STRUCTURE . PIPE SIZES AND SLOPES. PER PLANS. 2. OUTLET CAPACITY: NOT LESS THAN COMBINED INLETS. 3. EXCEPT AS SHOWN OR NOTED, UNITS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CATCH BASIN TYPE 2, 54" MIN. DIA. 4. PIPE SUPPORTS AND RESTRICTOR SHALL BE OF SAME MATERIAL, AND BE ANCHORED AT 3' MAX. SPACING BY 5/ 8" DIAM. STAINLESS STEEL EXPANSION BOLTS OR EMBEDDED 2'f IN WALL. 5. OUTLET SHALL BE CONNECTED TO CULVERT OR SEWER PIPE WITH SUITABLE COUPLER OR GROUTED INTO THE BELL OF CONCRETE PIPE. 5, THE VERTICAL RISER STEM OF THE RESTRICTOR SHALL BE 8" DIAM. 7. FRAME AND LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET SO THAT. A. SHEAR GATE IS VISIBLE FROM TOP. B. CLIMB DOWN SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER AND SHEAR GATE. C. FRAME IS CLEAR OF CURB. 8. IF METAL OUTLET PIPE CONNECTS TO CEMENT CONCRETE PIPE: OUTLET PIPE TO HAVE SMOOTH O.D. EQUAL. TO CONCRETE PIPE I.D. LESS 1 ". NTS TYpp'6'E 24" FLU""AW CONTROA 5'TRUCTUPRE PAVEMENT LAYER (DESIGNED Y SITE DESIGN ENGINEER) TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. FOR UNPAVED81 INSTALLATIONS RUTTING FROM VEHICLES MAY O CUR, `.\ > ' INCREASE COVER TO 30" (750 mm). � I•I/ 4 (2.4 m) (600 mm) MIN* MAX 9" (230 ) MIN 12" cc F CON ,)IJ ) SEE PLAN FOR I.E. AND DIA PAVED AREAS ADEQUATESET FLUSH W/FINISHED LANDSCAPE GRADE HDPE VALVE BOX SIZED--%\ FOR 4511 (1143 mm) L DEPTH OF STONE TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER 9" (230 mm) MIN 12" (300 mm) MIN )UT IS IN , PAVED SURFACE, HICKENED EDGE elso C RING MARKED DRAINS AND qES w � NTS STOKmTEU1 CHAMBERS 0 0 O 0 d G',.t}, G OY tl tl .v d 6ff p 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 O 0. 0 � 0 1110 0 O 0 :0 ff MIN. O 0 0 0 0 0�0 0 G G 0 0 0 O OR SLAB 20" THICKNESS TRENCH DRAIN CATCH BASIL PER ZURN 887--8 NTS (6"X20") OR APPROVED 41 IN EQUAL TRENU1 DRA 20I I PERMIT " Nu". Xx-xxxxxx-xx -TRENCH- DRAIN CATCH BASIN NTS Itt, co t 00 .-- c� co Cq Lu w F-- tv W v3 X C:) U- Ct C> r~ W m cr) fn , cQ A� F— W Lu W co z 4= :C W m z Q CL QW mill �- � W t-- M * • i+ s s. ,mot, i i a t� ,u A Date: 04/1/01 Job No.: 21739 Drawn y: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions Date Description 1 4/1 /2019 ADDENDUM 93 Z� 2 /21 /2019 LU/PERMIT RSUBMITTAL #1 31± VEGETATION 4' MEDIA FILTER STRIP DRAIN MIX 8' VEGETATION STRIP 4.7'± 6.5' MEDIA FILTER 4.7'± 3.0' DISPERSION VEGETATION STRIP DRAIN MIX VEGETATION STRIP ---,,--,—TRENCH OR FLATTER 4 4w -owl' PER PLAN) 3 3" MEDIUM COMPOST BLANKET 12 —PLANTINGS OR LAWN "o Aw. PER LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBGRADE PREPARATION PER LANDSCAPE 6 GRAVEL BACKFILL MEDIA FILTER—, FOR DRAINS I DRAIN MATERIAL 6 2$ 12 0 PERFORATED UNDER DRAIN PIPE 3.8'± 4' MEDIA FILTER 3,81± WITH HOLES DOWN VEGETATION STRIP DRAIN MIX VEGETATION STRIP MEDIA FILTER DRAIN #4 FLUSH CURB 6" MIN 4 OR FLATTER 'm (PER PLAN) 40* :L GRAV GRAVEL BASE 12 COUF COURSE I � —PLANTINGS OR LA1 3" MEDIUM PER LANDSCAPE F COMPOST BLANKET 6 GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR DRAIN ,30± SUBGRADE PREPARATION 8" 0 VEGETATION 4' MEDIA FILTER 10,6"I'll"I'l PER LANDSCAPE PERFORATED6 2 1 STRIP DRAIN MIX VEGETATION I P UNDER DRAIN PIPE . ...... . . ........... . ...... MEDIA FILTER DRAIN MATERIAL WITH HOLES DOWN FL.USH CURB - OR FLATTER . . . ......... .. 6" MIN 4 PEP PLAN A 3 1 LPLANTINGS OR LAWN GRAVEL BASE 12 PER LANDSCAPE PLAN COURSE 3" MEDIUM ---GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR DRAINS COMPOST BLANKET 6 SUBGRADE PREPARATION 0 PERFORATED PER LANDSCAPE 6 2' UNDER DRAIN PIPE MEDIA FILTER WITH HOLES DOWN DRAIN MATERIAL A A A MEDIA FILTEMP" DlN" #5 3.8'± VEGETATION STRIP 4' MEDIA FILTER 3.8± DRAIN MIX VEGETATION STRIP DRAINAGE NOTES 1. PROOF OF LIABILITY INSURANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY PRIOR TO THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. 2. ALL PIPE AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT 7-08.3(1). THIS SHALL INCLUDE LEVELING AND COMPACTING THE TRENCH BOTTOM, THE TOP OF FOUNDATION MATERIAL, AND REQUIRED PIPE BEDDING, TO A UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE PIPE IS SUPPORTED BY A UNIFORMLY DENSE UNYIELDING BASE. FLUSH CURB 3. STEEL PIPE SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT #1 OR BETTER INSIDE AND 7 OUTSIDE. 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE SUCH AS CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES, NOT LOCATED WITHIN A TRAVELED ROADWAY OR SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ASSOCIATED WITH A PERMANENT RETENTION/DETENTION FACILITY SHALL HAVE SOLID LOCKING LIDS. 5, ALL CATCH BASIN GRATES SHALL CONFORM TO CFW DRAWING NUMBERS 4 1, 4-2p 4-3t 4--4, 4-5� 4-8 OR 4-10. GRAVEL BASE 6. ALL DRIVEWAY CULVERTS LOCATED WITHIN THE RIGHT—OF—WAY SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH COURSE TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3:1 SLOPE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DRIVEWAY TO THE BOTTOM OF THE DITCH. CULVERTS SHALL HAVE BEVELED END SECTIONS TO MATCH THE SIDE SLOPES. 7. ROCK FOR EROSION PROTECTION OF DITCHES, CHANNELS AND SWALES, WHERE REQUIRED, MUST BE OF SOUND QUARRY ROCK, PLACED TO A DEPTH OF ONE FOOT AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 4'1-8)) ROCK/40%-70%PASSING; 211-4)1 ROCK/30%-40% PASSING; AND —2" ROCK/10%-20% PASSING. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH KCRS DRAWING NUMBER 7-024 OR AS AMENDED BY THE APPROVED PLANS. RECYCLED ASPHALT OR CONCRETE RUBBLE SHALL NOT BE USED. NOTCHED GRADE BOARD 2ffX2$) NOTCHES @ 18 lot 0C N&u NTS DRAINAGE NUTH ,.--END CAP OR PLUG ,--CLEAN OUT WYE FROM PIPE ,----6" PERE. PVC LAID FLAT AND LEVEL /—TYPE I CB OR SDCO PER PLAN A W/ LOCKING LID P LANINLET RIPE PER CLEAN OUT WYE FROM / PIPE NOTE: 1. THIS TRENCH SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO 11 rmr-vr-iNi ruim uiSurlmmur_ 2 1) (Typ) AND/OR EROSION. 2. TRENCHES MAY BE PLACED 2" (gip) v NO CLOSER THAN 50 FEET 18" O.C. TO ONE ANOTHER. (100 FEET ALONG FLOWLINE) . 3TRENCH AND GRADE BOARD SECTION B-B Al lr\Kl Tn rLUVV r-Lr-V rr—m rLk\m FG DOWNSTREAM OF GRADE BOARD IS TO BE LEVEL W/ BOTTOM OF NOTCHES 2.0% MA\/\' GALVANIZED BOLTS 14 2 02" PRESSURE TREATED NOTCHED GRADE BOARD W/ 2"X2" NOTCHES @ 18 Oc 4 $$ x4" SUPPORT POST— — 6" PERF. PVC PIPE LAID FLAT WITH HOLES UP FILTER FABRIC PRIOR TO FILLING TRENCH COORD W/ GEOTECH. IF OUTWASH SOILS ARE PRESENT PROVIDE LOW —PERMEABILITY LINER FOLLOW CONTOURS OF SITE. 4. SUPPORT POST SPACING AS 20% MAX. REQUIRED BY SOIL CONDITIONS TO ENSURE GRADE BOARD REMAINS LEVEL. 1� A A N\\\- I *am WASHED *jECTION 1, A A ROCK NTS O'N TRE" A' H GRAVEL DISPERSIO* N(� 1-44 WFA1112m, DO SUMP DEPTH TBD BY SITE DESIGN ENGINEER (24" [600 mm] MIN RECOMMENDED) MC-3500 CHAMBER A :4 mom 6.4 , IN I I i WA ON rd, ON AM NAGAGAG. Am. 777� 77, 77� 7= 11 . . . . . . . . . ml f►fir► 0" W40,l O, A 670- 9/4 WA 4W it rr Wyly 03 i2wd A '1 1 ►a '"MON I r 5----- -- INSPECTION & MA-INTENANCE STEP 1 INSPECT ISOLATOR ROW FOR SEDIMENT A. INSPECTION PORTS (IF PRESENT) A.1. REMOVE/OPEN LID ON NYLOPLAST INLINE DRAIN A.2. REMOVE AND CLEAN FLEXSTORM FILTER IF INSTALLED A.3. USING A FLASHLIGHT AND STADIA ROD, MEASURE DEPTH OF OPTIONAL INSPECTION PORT SEDIMENT AND RECORD ON MAINTENANCE LOG A.4. LOWER A CAMERA INTO ISOLATOR ROW FOR VISUAL INSPECTION OF SEDIMENT LEVELS (OPTIONAL) MC-3500 END CAP A.5. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, 3$f (80 mm) PROCEED TO STEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. B. ALL ISOLATOR ROWS •41 A. B. 1. REMOVE COVER FROM STRUCTURE AT UPSTREAM END OF AA? \�7/ *� :. \ , I 7/ x ISOLATOR ROW X B. 2. USING A FLASHLIGHT, INSPECT DOWN THE ISOLATOR ROW XX X THROUGH OUTLET PIPE MIRRORS ON POLES OR CAMERAS MAY BE USED TO AVOID A CONFINED SPACE ENTRY ii)FOLLOW OSHA REGULATIONS FOR CONFINED SPACE ENTRY IF 7/ ENTERING MANHOLE Y ;001 B.3. IF SEDIMENT IS AT, OR ABOVE, (80 mm) PROCEED TO S TEP 2. IF NOT, PROCEED TO STEP 3. X x. � STEP 2) CLEAN OUT ISOLATOR ROW USING THE JETVAC PROCESS 45" (1.1 m) OR MORE IS PREFERRED B. APPLY MULTIPLE PASSES OF JETVAC UNTIL BACKFLUSH WATER IS CLEAN C. VACUUM STRUCTURE SUMP AS REQUIRED STEP 3) REPLACE ALL COVERS, GRATES, FILTERS, AND LIDS; RECORD OBSERVATIONS AND ACTIONS. STEP 4) INSPECT AND CLEAN BASINS AND MANHOLES UPSTREAM OF THE STORMTECH SYSTEM. lilt NOTES 1. INSPECT EVERY 6 MONTHS DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. ADJUST THE INSPECTION INTERVAL BASED ON PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS OF SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION AND HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS. 2. CONDUCT JETTING AND VACTORING ANNUALLY OR WHEN INSPECTION SHOWS THAT MAINTENANCE IS NECESSARY. �--- 24" (600 mm) HDPE ACCESS PIPE REQUIRED TWO LAYERS OF ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 315WTM WOVEN USE FACTORY PRE —CORED END CAP PART #-. GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN FOUNDATION STONE AND CHAMBERS �� MC35001EPP24BC OR MC35001EPP24BW 8.25' (2.51 m) MIN WIDE CONTINUOUS FABRIC WITHOUT SEAMS aft I= Al Idi Allilill in A90111111 Al to AM Alaft, nuumk �lllllk Idi is m it 11091 101mm 1111ill Im m 0 NTS I A m C o, 3`5 u" u" A" PVC I'N'SPEC"TION"' PUO*"*'RT NTS MC-3500 ISOLATOR ROW STORMTECH UNDERDRAIN DETAIL CHAMBER �����oM NTS STORMTECH END CAP FOUNDATION STONE BENEATH CHAMBERS ADS GEOSYNTHETICS 601T NON —WOVEN GEOTEXTILE NTS UNDERDRAIN �m PERFORATES: HDPE UNDERDRAI SECTION _B7'B PERMIT Nu. XX—X)(XXXX—XX RESUBMITTAL #1 6/21/2019 Ljj 114- CID cc as (n 00 C-11 cca Lu Wto _j CD C14 uj x (=)LL CC C) C14 uj (0 Lu W C14 z 4muld < W Z 0 -r DCL 0 C/)W t-_Ljj yY Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: C R L Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description Z� 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 ZI 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 100% rm% (3RADING" AN DRAINAGE DETAILS LWSD STANDARD PLANS (WATER) SiAN AR PLAN DRAWINGS LAST PUBLIC PRIVATE PLAN ID TITLE UPDATE MAIN SERVICE A-5 PAVEMENT REPAIR 09-95 X SP 17 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION (3", 4" & 6")o 2 PGS. 12-17 X B-18d STANDARD TRENCH RIGID PIPE WATER MAIN 'X x B-19a—R HYDRANT SETTING TYPE A 03-94 X B-19b HYDRANT LOCATION IN CUT OR FILL — HYDRANT GUARD POST 03-94 X B-21 a—R PERMANENT BLOW —OFF ASSEMBLY (3" SIZE) 09-95 X B-21 c WATER VALVE BOX APPURTENANCES & PROTECTIVE PAD 03-94 X B-22a CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING — HORIZONTAL & CONCAVE VERTICAL BENDS, 2 PGS. 09-95 x X EXISTING STATIC PRESSURE 42-34 PSI (MAX/MIN FOR SITE ELEV) SYSTEM HEAD 591 571 (HIGH/LOW ELEV) PRESSURE ZONE 578 PZ SITE ELEV 493 FLOW PER LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT WITH NEW 1800 GPM @ 20 PSI R[SIDUAL 8" LOOP AND TWO CONNECTIONS TO MAIN MINIMUM FIRE FLOW PER 1800 GPM SOUTH KING COUNTY FIRE MAX SPACING BETWEEN.DEAD HYDRANTS IFC END: 450 1 —100 + 5 0 5 2 5' .PER LOOP:450' + 50% 675' APP C) LAur\`ErulmA`%VmtNftft lftNkXES THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHA\!ENI UTILITY DIS"I'SIC -l" 'WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS' APPROVAL BY THE WASHINGTON SATE DEPARTjME,4'i' Oi_ HEAL7H ON JUNE 8, 1994 AND ANY ACCEPTABLE CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND RESTORATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK PERFORMED IN ROW ARE DEFINED BY THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY AND MAY NOT BE SHOWN THE PLANS APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONSULT WITH LAKEHAVEN'S PROJECT INSPECTOR AND ANY APPLICABLE ROW PERMIT FOR ACCEPTABLE CONSTRUCTION METHODS (OPEN TRENCH, BORE & CASE), DIRECTIONAL DRILL, ETC). AND EXTENT OF ASPHALT OVERLAY &/OR OTHER RESTORATION REQUIREMENT FOR WORK IN ROW. SEPARATE WATER SERVICE CONNECTION APPLICATION REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO LWSD FOR METER INSTALLATION & FULL SERVICE ACTIVATION SURVEY NOTES 1. SURFACE UTILITY FACILITIES ARE SHOWN HEREON PER FIELD LOCATED VISIBLE EVIDENCE. THERE MAY BE UTILITIES THAT EXIST ON THIS SITE OTHER THAN THOSE GRAPHICALLY DEPICTED HEREON. 2. UNDERGROUND (BURIED) UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON COMBINATIONS OF VISIBLE SURFACE EVIDENCE, UTILITY LOCATOR MARKINGS AND RECORD DATA (SUCH AS AS —BUILT OR UTILITY DESIGN DRAWINGS). ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE AND, IN SOME CASES, ARE SHOWN AS STRAIGHT LINES BETWEEN FIELD LOCATED SURFACE UTILITY FACILITIES. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY HAVE BENDS, CURVES OR CONNECTIONS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN. 3. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND FEATURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM FIELD SURVEY BY AHBL, MAY 2018 AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT COMPLETE. ADDITIONAL SURFACE FEATURES AND IMPROVEMENTS BEYOND THOSE INDICATED ARE PRESENT AND IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL EXISTING INFORMATION AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER UTILITIES AND SURFACE FEATURES NOT SHOWN HEREIN WITH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE PLANS. 4. ALTHOUGH LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BASED ON UTILITY LOCATOR MARKINGS AND RECORD DATA (SUCH AS AS —BUILT OR UTILITY DESIGN DRAWINGS) ARE DEEMED RELIABLE, AHBL, INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF SAID DATA. 5. CALL 1-800-424-5555 BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION. GE ERAL WATER MAIN NOTES 1. THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN WATER & SEWER DISTRICT —WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS, DATED 2012 AND STANDARD & TYPICAL PLAN DRAWINGS — WATER, DATED DECEMBER 2017. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY THIS WORK AND SHALL NOTIFY APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES TO FIELD —LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES BEFORE STARTING ANY EXACVATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH RCW 19.122. 3. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO UNDERSTAND, COORDINATE, AND SCHEDULE SEQUENCED PHASING OF CONSTRUCTION AND SEQUENTIAL OCCUPANCY BY THE OWNER WITH THE SCHEDULE AND INTENT INDICATED THROUGHOUT THE DOCUMENTS. C-301 300 2 1 —304 PROJEC" DATA ..... . . ..... ­­"­­'­ . ..... ­­­,­ .... .... . ........ .. PROJECT ADDRESS: 2405 S 300TH ST FEDERAL WAY, WA 98003 OWNER: FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS JURISDICTION.- LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY.- SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE ZONING: R S 7.2 LOT SIZE: 9.39 ACRES TAX 1. D. NO.: 0421049167 m UHL M WATE SYSTE" S" "m"MARY 1WATER (DOMES"I'lC SYSTEM): A. 3 'r# REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY (RPBA) REQUiRED FOR THE DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM PER LWSD W.3.1(4)—B DUE TO DOMESTIC BOOSTER N If PUMP LOCATED INSIDE. APPLIES TO WILDWOOD. RPBA LOCATED OUTSIDE AND ABOVE GRADE. B. 3" METER LOCATED IN BELOW GROUND VAULT. C. PEAK ESTIMATED WATER FLOW = 115 GPM D. BOOSTER PUMP REQUIRED TO INCREASE PRESSURE; INSTALLED IN BOILER ROOM. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS. APPLIES TO WIL. WHERE A BOOSTER PUMP IS INSTALLED, A LOW—PRESSURE SERVICE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED BETWEEN FWPS AND LWSD. 2. FIRE SYSTEM A. THE FDC IS WALL MOUNTED AND LOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. B. WIL.- BOOSTER PUMP REQUIRED TO INCREASE PRESSURE. THE PUMP WILL BE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING. C. 6" BACKFLOW PREVENTION/DETECTION REQUIRED PER LWSD W.3.1(4), LOCATED OUTSIDE. ISOLATION DEVICE IS ABOVE GROUND, REDUCED PRESSURE WITH PIV. D. FLOW— D ETECTI 0 NfTATTLE —TALE METER IS REQUIRED FOR ALL FIRE —PROTECTION SERVICES 3" & LARGER. 3. IRRIGATION SYSTEM — SEE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLANS A. SEPARATE IRRIGATION METER REQUIRED. 1.5" METER B. PEAK ESTIMATED IRRIGATION FLOW = 52 GPM. C. BACKFLOW PREVENTION REQUIRED PER LWSD W3.1(5). D. BOOSTER PUMP PROPOSED TO INCREASE PRESSURE. 0 ask a `VlERTICA"L DATUM NGVD 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90' NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BT THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. NIK u m VlkmA Iftm lo�;116421TY P LEGAL DESCRlPT1u4*`N LAKE,,.HAN,7 EN'WATER, A-.Nt7D SE'11-'ER DISTRI[C"T "'eT Plan Water Pla n Da,ted .k'PPR0N7'ED FOR lC70NS._'-TR"LTC'Tl0N SlUBJECTTO CHANNGES NOTED lky The DIS.1tri-d's, ,review is, not a confirmation of a -ch e, qlulXthedw.got reieve thDeveoper ,or EhRlneer from, respotvcsibllit°� r, Plan errorss- 2sio changes Shan, be matte to the plans except with, dit consen-tof the District, NOT TO SCALE PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE GUARANTEE NUMBER 0119605—TC, EFFECTIVE DATE MARCH 21, 2018): THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET 11,1EREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7202150467, BASIt'"im" OF BE AARING NA 89/91 WAS HINGTON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HORIZONTAL CONTROL HOLDING COUNTY MONUMENT NUMBERS 100 AND 119. POINT NO. 100 N= 118491.72 E= 1273293.33 CASE MONUMENT AT SOUTH 320TH ST AND PACIFIC HWY SOUTH POINT NO. 119 N= 125715.24 E= 1274764.57 CASE MONUMENT AT 20TH AVE SOUTH AND SOUTH 298TH ST. SHEET LIST TABLE SHT NO DESCRIPTION C-300A WATER COVER SHEET C-300 WATER OVERALL C_ 301 WATER C-302 WATER C-303 WATER C-304 WATER C-305 WATER DETAILS SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FO UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATI Wj co m co,,- Z") m C14 to UJ _j C) 71 ui C)U- ui m Cn co Lu to Cn z < uj Z 0 Da_ 0 C/) LU _j t-- Lu 410 ,�7777 -rNj Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By.- R L Checked by. BP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 Z�2 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1: WATER COVE SHEET 077 01 LAI ;4 P NGVU 29 THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT -, . r .� , L wo ob i X. Lj t W-ater Plan,, D,attii hDistrict's vil , not a ation f any irli n o: hown III the plans an la " not eliev e �� v� �� r E .g nee ra n re ssibl' hivy f-or P n ror .., 'No clumgges, shall, be timide t 'die plans except with fli.e consent of the. li strlct SERIESSEE C-6XX r. r Nt w ♦'/ co co Lu W(0 LLJ �d c) u- cr: W 00 _C14 W(0 �(.0 �- ON < W : z 0 m �- D a.. 0 C/) W —j h^ W ;111 id f� M i ebb i 400 r` S t' p`• Y, 9 �1, 3\, t * S, i� r� h % 4 Date: 04/ 15/2 01 Job No.. 21739 Drawn y. C R L Checked by BP Revisions Date Description 1 4/15/019 ADDENDUM 03 /21/2 19 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL 1 'N LWA 51 U jhhl�77" AW NGVD 29 1. THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 DISTRICT 'WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS' APPROVAL BY THE MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. WASHINGTON SATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ON JUNE 8, 1994 AND ANY ADDENDA PUBLISHED ELEVATION.- 508.90 0 THERETO. 2. PIPE IS 8" DIAMETER, CL52 DIP. COVER 3' MIN OR 12" ABOVE TOP OF VALVE OPERATING NUT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EX 6" AC it "FIT, CRD#WTRO364 N 41 4^1 ......... ...... W V 440 LF FROM POC 42b U FROM POC ­m�TO EX VALVE ON N E TO CORNER OF 23RD EX HYDRANT ON CORNER OF 23RD­ 4/11 xH ..... ...... wH ... . .. . .. ----------- '47 6, /711 ------------ I", I\ I'V / �a J� , 0 v" e 20 AZ EASI A, Z 4B 20$ WATER EASEMENT TYP) 7 .. . .. ....... i VERTICAL BENDS PER LUD STD PLAN B-22a AS NECESSARY A, -,TO MAINTAIN 3COVER 10) . . . ......... . ... j 80 LF 8 CL 52 DI Wtr Q) yf KS :A ga" 5 NVI `,,,J STA. 101+98.1 8)) 45* BEND (MJ) 0 THRUST BLOCKING PER C1* LWSD STD PLAN B-22afi J, 7 9 LF 8" CL 52 DI W 19 'ASS N 014 1 lip" Z < Z J" 20' WATER EASEMENT S C ` vL 0r) t STA. 102+77.2 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (1) 81) X 6)) TEE (FL) r . .. ..... (1) 8" GATE VALVE (FLxMJ)` (1) 611 GATE VALVE (FLxRJ) 01 CD (1) 8)$ ADAPTER (FLXMJ) + 4 LWSD STD PLAN B—t 19a—R VALVE BOX PROTECTED PAD PER LWSD STD PLAN B-21 c . ....... . ... . 1,111"" Y' T 20 0 10 20 441 ASO& Aft 0% a ter. u N.001"11 LVVW "U011 11U00 days before you dig. LAIiZEHkN._EN'WATER ANi1D SE11'ER DISTRIC"T r"91% WAROY'd WI.-iter pli-Phan Ll Dated .AYPROITED FOR iC*0NSTR1LT'C'T10N SSILTBJECT TO CRAINGES NOTED The Dic."'trict's review Is. not zi confirinaion of ,any, dimensloll Of ,qmntit1*ec_,-­;hmt1 m_ fliie platis and. will tiot relieve; the Developer or F-,,n,, glineer frimm. responssibihty flar plaiierrorss,-, 'INTo ch. g, 1 .1 -in es, shaall be. nit e to, flie. plans., except with, the c.onsenrof the District. a D,evelopment Eugmieet-ing M:ani-ager D;%to The Dis-trxfs afpprQVal of this con"itruction,pbm, -�%ifl ex,131re, '011e: (1)� year ftom the dzit e of plan zipjmoval if consmiction has 'U, ot conurne.nced by. such datt., of, two; (2) 7(Tm.s ftom the cLite of ph mr a 11 constnniction -as co ac, P nmie Emmm mummmomm mom PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION FF ® FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT .. . . ...... (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN DETENTION FACILITY STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER '" WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR: UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION LU Itt co cc to 0) co cli U-1 C) W C.') U_ Cr. VC9 W M) co W W I— CD z 4mum W Z 0 0 CL 0 W W 40 • IM 777 -77,77"77 Y t. Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 4 z6�/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019, LU/1PERM IT RESUBMITTAL #1 NGVD 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90' WATLR SYSTEM NOTES 1. THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 'WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS' APPROVAL BY THE WASHINGTON SATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ON JUNE 8s 1994 AND ANY ADDENDA THERETO. 2. PIPE IS 8 DIAMETER, CL52 DIP. COVER 3' MIN OR 12" ABOVE TOP OF VALVE UHLKAIINU NUI, UNLUi�i U1HLKVV1tiL NUILU. I I STA 115+62 C-30 N 125021.7 E 1276591.5 CUT —IN TO EX 6" WATER MAIN (1) 8" TEE (FL) (1) 8"' GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) (2) 8))X601 REDUCER (FLxMJ) (2) 6" SLEEVE (2) 6" TRANSITION COUPLING (ACxDI) TWDI 1QT 01 ()OVIKIO I I I . I . . ........................ II... .... ... 420 LF FROM P C JO EX HYDRANT ON 3;1,�\00"T,H 45 I I(N Q i V III9 49 '0 9 9 Ivo *99 '119(91 11 119 IIII CL 52 DI W IIIIIIliCIO .......... 20' IWATER 486f, IEASEMENT itI R LWSD STD ... .. ...... ........ CL 52 DI W IIPLAN B-22a AS NECESSARY TO ..... .... ... ..... ..... iI. . .. . ... .... I.... . ..... ...... .... ....... . ... ...... MAI NTAI N 3) COVER 48(9 3z I- --------- ........ . ..... 4,89 . .... . .... ..... . .. . .. ..... I490 . . .. ..... tIIIiIIIIIIII10 IIIII. ........ . . . .... II. .... .. . IIIIIISTA. 113+59.9 I0 STA. 112+74.4 jj I 18y) 450 BEND (MJ) 8)) 450 BEND (MJ) THRUST BLOCKING PER IITHRUST BLOCKING PER ILWSD STD PLAN 13-22a� IIILWSD STD PLAN B-22a I490 II II0"am #ANON* *M%"W0 *goall" "W*x" CL 52 DI W #101lill b 3+00 Icl:� 01 t Lu Z IIui C 9 LF 8 L 491 ISTA. 1 1 2+60.3 491 ILA 52 DI W tI#Al ml Nol 8" 450 BEND (MJ) "on mmmo =gum" THRUST BLOCKING PER I " CL 52 DI W —22a ILWSD STD PLAN B I— ------------------- A STA. 113+51.1 STA. 112+07.9 IIFIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 8)$ 45* BEND (MJ) 6 RPDA IN, Z THRUST BLOCKING PER 8)) X 6" TEE (FL) 2 NW < Z 0 N Q� I LWSD STD PLAN B-24U (1) 8" GATE VALVE (FLxMJ I ui 6" GATE VALVE (FLxRJ) z 0 Lr) (1) 8" ADAPTOR (FLxMJ IWALL MOUNTED II< L4J Iz 19a—R FDC itui L;2= 9 LF 6" CL 52 DI W STA. 111+88.5 z z FIRE LINE CONNECTION 4 (1) 81) X 6" TEE (FL) 0 9O.::__ 0 ilISTA. 1 1 1 +86.1 (1) 6)) GATE VALVE BURIED (FLxMJ) " CL 52 DI W 8 45* BEND (FLxMJ (1) 8" ADAPTOR (FLxMJ) 9 CD . . . . . . . . . . . . . � CD THRUST BLOCKING PER THRUST BLOCKING PER —22a LWSD STD PLAN B-22a FIRE LWSD STD PLAN B ItISTA. 111+77.2 (2) 6 90 SERVICE LINE RPDA IRRIGATION CONNECTION BENDS (RJ) II ICE CONNECTION 34 LF 6 FIR E (PRIVATE) APPLICATION REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED SERVICE LINE —49 1— TO LWSD FOR METER INSTALLATION IRRIGATION POINT IVATION 33 LF 8" CL 52 DI W liii6ftlob�� GREW 4D 4NEW anow 4D Gomm OnNn so 400M 4MEM W =am 40 =N= mum 40 qw�m 40 OMMM muv� si,liv� Ong, im 40 4190M 4now 40 GRUM ME= on NWN6,40=61 4* MEW 408NO do GOMM 4MEM 40 0M 0 A MA CHLINE STA 1'1'1+68 umm S St'l' ET C===3 4 LAKEHAN EN WATER. ANI'D SE117" R. DISTRICT , Al Se�7v,er Phm W,, �ter Phq,n, Dtated .kP�PRO117ED FOR tC0CN$TR1Ur'CTI0N SUBJECT TO CHANNGES NOTED The review is not a., confir of any s"011 01- qul,ml,,tille-�,ishowu, In, tthe platisati,d Will, tiot tffieDeve1qpe:r or gineer froin re.sponsibiht-Ny; for plan '"No chnge, s 20 0 10 20 40 be to -di.e. exept with ffie consent of the Distri'llic-t- Scale 1 um"20' 'The �Dislric f 5, of this expire.- one, from the zite of ptan if constru,ct.10*n ha's not co.inmenced bysuch or yes,from thie date of pkin LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR 230 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 -- PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION FF 78.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN lSTORM DETENTION FACILITY DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION C-301 C-302 / ... . ...... .. SSMH BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT P, Elwa; � WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRF 1;FRV1C.F I INF FIRE SERVICE VAULT IFIRE SERVICE CONNECTION ,SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS F UTILI CROSSING INFORMATION LW 114. 00 cc co M co to CD CD U- cc cn 00 uj 4%L mo �_= Do- C=M 0 LU _j M:m 40 4 II Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/201 9 ADDENDUM 03 Z� 6/21/2019 IU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 WATER SYSTEM NOTES 1. THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 DISTRICT 'WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS' APPROVAL BY THE MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. WASHINGTON SATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ON JUNE 8, 1994 AND ANY ADDENDA PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90' THERETO. 2. PIPE IS 8" DIAMETER, CL52 DIP. COVER 3' MIN OR 12" ABOVE TOP OF VALVE OPERATING NUT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. m A NA m A AAW& 1 1 A A sul NowlM V I 1 400ow snow 40 40mm 4mmm " 40NO ja fmmm ft Gomm 480rm so more soon " snow �mm ft =mm =me m 40mm m some ME= m am= fmmnm m come Gomm m SWIM am= m snow amm m amom "emmm m mm�m soon doom 01mm 40 4511m eon= m , \ " I I , , , I i� I " el, I " � I �1 I k`, 7 691m I., , ",/ � `- 4 / i , `\,, All" ', ,�11 �,�,��, t_," 1_11­11­ `_`�' ,_ W , , I 'i � V OM71_1� 1 / _', V � , " �mm ` - A I x I� I'll � I � I � ��j I �lt_ 1, �-7 �, 71, " ",,'­ ik,� / g, / � I � `� �,� � 1 7, " I I" 11 �11 11 Ah , " \" Il , I , I � Ai , , � i� 11 , ,�,� � , I \ , 1Z / / / ", - I , / i " ", I � i,11 �,, i I !, ,,�,,, " 1, j I I/ � "I � il I , " � o I I "' R , I i "' "I i I I �� � I ,,,,, i, -11, 11 I / ", #g 11' '�,� 11111`1111111 � �, " " , \ , � 1, ��,,� ,� 'T'k I , �11111:�1411 / / / I ". "I, I /, � � I _1�1�, , I � , � '1� , , , , ,, ii ;__ "I I I I I i ­� 11 11"� I I / � i I I �, ,,,,)1, 'i""'! -�, � I I 4, , / , t "I f % I � ""', I ; 1, k"', " ­­r) I il 11 I I i \ , _ " " , , , =I,. , 1 , " "I f','� ,,�i I I , \ ,� I � �E, r I 11k, , , , I � I " i '� ,I 11 \ 11 i�ti 0 1 i ; 1i ?I. , � lk i � , , \ I I \ \ \ �,,,,,�; "I \ "I i 1.11, " .1111­1,11 � , \ , , ,, " 1, I [�, � \ _ 11, , 1, " � � ` �Itl -, 11 \ \ , 1, \ �, , � � ,,, I I " � � �,�, a . I I 111­ "I ,11" , �� � 11 � I'll, I I `1 .� FF 493.0 '_11", - � 1; , � � , 11��­,[ J I �,�,,,, �, , \ ­­­­ __­11 , , " 11`1� 11 , i I , � % � \), �� "'I'll", I " I \ � I , I 11�� 11 I ---- II I - I ` �' %) ­,1111 ...... . ,_", I , ' , I / I - I V" -, _1111111 '_, ___ ... ..... . _11 11_11- _111­1­ ­­­­ vl, ) � "I �--� " __ I , -, )" I lit",� I111,14 __ c \ k \�,� 11 11 I � �, It ��,,) �% � I, 11 . .. I ,,,'�',,, ill, I 11", � I 1� , � � ", I � ", 1' I ," 11 " "''.11,1111111111 , 11�1' i " " , k, 11"I" i� 11 A � \, � I i " I tI , ,"­11­ ,I I I 1 �3 � I ) I 'Iii'11114 t I ,7, T'luill!r1m "� -7 11 - -------- , , I` i I t,1, "i � � 74 �', ,� ", , I '77, 7, , " I ­ "�, """ '_t,"� 117_1111_ I— -A 'Itli "I'l,",' ��'�,1�1� �111`_ '­" .0 Ti �,,--_---7 -77,11 111, 1,11 11 Ili I , I ` ", , , � ;"I 1A I In" �111� I � N"', 11 I " v"'t, ,' `�' I 7,77 1 � T I 11 ,blll �_`V2 'r" "I'll, , " " I I I I I ".111 j � I �11 , ,,�,� �111`i , I'll "I - li�` 11 1 i , 11 �1_ , 1, '11� x , , 1, k, 111PI"t" , , , ii� "" I - " "" "" " I I _ 11 It' I i ", 'If"11`111,11, , \ Ili , , , , , , ", , , , , , , ", 111,1111 Nlal 11 " �'t, i " t , , , , ­1 �, " �'t, " �'t, , " , , " , " 1� " , I ", I - , " , - - �,,,,�,,,,,,,,.!�=��,�-:�"",-,"�,,,�"/��,,�,�'!", "I I !;, �, i �, "I'll � ,�'I'���'ll""Ill"ll"l�',�'."""��l-.- ,�, ,,�,t,"\,�,� " - , ��, , � I I'll "I �11111'111'1111111_ -- -1-1 1-11-1-1-­ 111! �� � � �,,� ,� [*�` � � ,I _ � �, *�, , I 11 ",- � "; 11- I,; , f tY , , , " I 'I" 11114,1� " � �11,�'1,11,'Iltlsl`� �,,, , �:",,�,_ ,_=,��,,,,,,��,,,,, ,,%,,,,�� -� ,4,� - - �� ,, , ,, I'll , _,i,�',V` 0 � I f 7, � � 1�1 , �A_��'1111�illl�*, I , 1; "I, =..11'1�7111, . . . . . , , ., 1­1 ,-, , �,;',,�,!�it"_ , " ____"____ ". ,- ,,,, �",,*�"*."::-",��.1111"'�"I _,�i I �"' - " �,�:,��,,,�w _­ _� ..... --�,�­�'_­� 1"It I I'll ­­­�41,,,v, ,� ! '­- - , � 1 ,^,,-,,z7,,�,,,-,,,��"""�,,,,��""��,,-. 11 ` , , I "�'�__:=��" '�-�i"",�,��'ll"��ll,�ll",�,�',�"�-""��"'�"-�.,,,�,,,,,��, 1 111,111, �-� ­_ --- "�I_� .. .. . ... r , ""I'll �'.11,1 ��:,�,,�,t,,� " ,,, � � I , , �', " / � I ",�,,! J"'� \ " `1:,_'___" ... 7-, litl­ ­ ,,�`, "i" , " �', ,,,,� � , I 11�� " �',�'I'll'I",",��'I",'�'I'l.1, 1'�`11' " "", ­­,­­`­- ,, � , �� 11,111k � ­ - , ,-'�-_.�--,,,�,,-,,��,,-�-,-, ­�, � � 11-1,71 I �;�',�,,, t�3 ���-.��,,,,�.,�,.,-.�"",�,:""� ,_�� ,,,: I'�')""�'ll'�'�'I'l�""""",� , "" , �J' , I I _ ", _1.111�,,` �1;1,,�1,11, '21'1�1'1­ � I , " � I � Y. __ � .. .... �""`,,,g,�g' " ;i I I I'��ll",�ll""I'�,,�,�i�'I'l"""'I " i 11�""" J;­ IV� 0,11 I 1," 1� � I "I I , I I I 1 I , I I \ t � � , , ,,,,! , 1, I I" I I ,� � J, � "I 11 ,�,� , , - I \ " � t ," ''I 11 � 11� "" 1,",!, STA. 107+99.3 t , ,� ''i " I I , �,, , I 11 � " I I 0 ,% , " I ", � I I , I I", I I 1, I , "� � 1, I � 1, %, ,� " I 1, \ I "! � \ \ ," I I I I � , I "I ,,�,, ��,;! \ I 1� � i I 11, I I 1, 1 I" I , �, , I I I I ''I I 1, -4-11 t""", I I '11111"� I U,�FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY , � "I I 11 � , ., \"\ , � ! " 1�, 1, � 11 I � I " , � ", " � ) " A, i ,� ,� I , , , z ; � � '', ", �, � � I i, """ ,( 1 , 1, 'I, 1, 1, I 1, 1. I '� I 1. 11 ,,, �, ", "I't/ , ,, I ,I, I �, . 11 I I I 1\ I I',, 11,�-11, '""' ,�_ � � � ), /' i"111 i I 01' '11�', J'Ak .� � I", , � - (1) 8" X 6" TEE (FLxMJ 11 1�11 I 1, 1\ �' I Nt "I'll, � H - , I 11 � I J I I I , ) I , 01,'ii I 1, I I I , I I . I I I I " 1\�� /,( I, ' I Il'l, I , I I - I 1, ,�", � ­ 1, I", , , " I I I I 11, " " " " "I ,', ,, (1) 6" GATE VALVE (FLx , 0 " " 1\ �, I 1, I" , \ I I 1, /, ''I , '' � , , i"J, it"""'i", , I � I I I I "",�l "",� ''I I , I "" 1, t � 11�1 11, 1, ". , , , , "�,, """, ��,,� 11 ''I I " 11 11 11 ., , � (,,,,�� � ,i�,, t, � , / , 1, ,,,,, , " I I I , I I I I 1'� I "I 1, , � ,� " ,� , I � I , 1, � , I , t I I , 11,", "I , "' i�, iim! I I , , , , ,, \11 ", ) � �1, , ,,, , � , ,J,,""'i, \,' 1 'I'll �i 11 , I , 1, 1�'111� - "I � `� �,, " - I , I " 1� I " 1 I I ".1 ,'�� I im , " I /� 4 I I , "' 11 I, I I I ,'I � 11�1 "I �, " I I , . 1� ,1 " " -11 ", ,� �� , � I I I I ) I I " I 11 , "III! 1'1�111'11 t! ,I , , I � ,\ I , i, I I I I 1 , , " 1� , , I ", , � , � I ,�' - . I I , , " \­ ill, � ,w " I ­ � � " / ,� � I , I I I - A 1 " ) / ,­ � N ,"', (4) BOLLARDS , I , , ,,, -11 , 11 I � 1, ,,,, I lr�t_,­ I I , 1 , i� / , I - , I , ­11111111 I'll, I I I \ � I lu�l I i 11 � " \ I 1� I , I " 11 � I I I I 11 I 11 ''I I I . 1',�,, \%"11 ,/, , I 11 , � " I 11 �14 � , III,, i, I "", :�'� I , � 1, i ;!i,'�, I I 1. I � 1, I,,, I, , 1, '11"I"I"It," 11 11 I I I I I I I 11 I I 11Y")i �ii� � , j , , " 11� ti�,,, I 1, I , t � I c 11� ", � � , , I , ", " �� 4 i 1� ) / J'�, I �, 1�1 ,1 x I I , , I . �, ,,,,I C1, I " I 1�,, ,��, 11 11 " I I 11 ''I "I 11 I'��, ,�<', "I 11, '_\ ER , , I I I 1, I i I , , It"', e�', , / V I I 1, I I �" \ It ", I I I 1, , " I I I � , , , , � I "I I " � � " 1� � " , , "'. , � I I " In 0 a I I M m m m m m TCriLINE ST 103+ E MEET C 3 1 4OW-W, 1 1 , " I I I 1`11 I I I 11 7 T"i". � I k /, I " !� """ �,/ \ ',% I.", , i \',�,, I I I I I I I I I I I I � 11 " "I I I I.",' I'�"""�','��",�l", ""I "i, \11, , � � � I I 1�1 , I 1, I , , - I I I �,,� �I, ,,, � i,�_ �,, , i I I I 1 ­ 01, � I 11 , ", 1`1 �11 � I i,,�, � 1 � I , 15tj, It - I I . � I", I- 11 1, � I , I I , I "" , ­.11 I � I `,!''!, �� I "111"�ttl 11, I 11 I_— 11, " 111AN1,1111 I 1% 41 $ , I I � �,,-,,,,�,,�" It"i `,�'f, I", , ,,j� I'll I 1, _� : ,, I 11 , �'1'1�11,1'1�111 "i''i'll, 11 I I", " I'' -, " --- -1- �a,,��, I I 1��,, 1111'111111� � , ,,,, , 1, \ � , �`,�" , , , , I I I � I " I �,�?,�,'�,,,,,�� """ I 11 �', I I I , > "I' I I �_ �� -,��,, y 1� ''I'll, .", t��', 'i � V� , 1,111 i� I I - ��" I\ , " ,�,, 11, 'I , � � ` , I I ,,� , il"�111, -, 1�11 � , , " I 'I " "ti, ,�, "'� 'r" " 1\ -, I I I,,''\ I /I li, 11� I � ", / 1, it, 11, I `� '11",�'1'1'1 I �,11, ,,�� li� , I I 11 �� , - I I , , , ')'4 , x "' 11"/." il, I % !, I, `k� �, "" " "' � t ",\ ) I '-- i I I I I" 11,, �I,'tjx�,"�';� "I 'I tl� , I , I I i , , I "I � I 11. ,4,,�, I , �1?1f"­` � � I i� _,� I I 111� 1�` I il I 1, 11,,�.,,,, kl'y I I I I", , I 11, I I " I .,,,, D ": 'I, ',"'� I �` I , 1, " � i,�, I I , V )\ "I �') I/ A �,, 11 'I'll 11 I 1�/ 11 I I I ­­ A" i �� � I � ", ", '' \/-""",-,-"�,�l.-'--�:-,--��,.-�-"*, I ''I "':% I "111,11", , i I t I "I ", , "��', I , , , I I ) �, � 1� 'i, ''', " ,,� -1 , I 11�'1111i` , , , i , , " , 1, - k I �j , � _��''!, \ sUi 11 � I le I 111" - -_ 1/1,11 , �\ I "I , 11 ", ", ­­ ­­­ ­­­11-­­­�-, as I\ 11, I , :Ili,, I "''I 'i", ­/ ,­11 ,,,, _ ... 1.111__ ; ., "," 11 � 't�,,\ i,i''� "I 1­11111- "Ill "I ''I ,""', I "__ .... .. _111_11 ''I'l- , I I'll, 11--It"11-11 � �,��,,��"",�,�"""!,�,,,,,,�,,,,,,,�",N�.,,..,,,-�,��,,,-.���,,���-�'',�I ­­ 1. '�_ �,�\" V � Ill/ 1- i I" _1 11 ­ I I \ , ,� I I uj --;;o- �- M < M I 111�r 3�: W ^ V) 0 I I I '' 11 , , , ", - � 11 C) I , � 1,09+00 I 2m______ 111111 i t - "o f WXM=m= 4 Em Wmam momm"i 1% m u I PUMM1111amm I ._.�.VOO_A, - rF"l LANE ,,,,,-- NO 0 � 0 "n 0 \1 I I , I , I'll " " 2 2 I , mw*�* , i 0 41 I 0, o 141 � ,, om 00140004" .0100m~ ,$014040041040 '0411000imm" *1*01001W L 41101immomm 40101011001M .1010111110ow oftmom" � , I , I W ] AMRUld - ONDIUVd ON � I I 1 I ­ I 3z , I "I A J$ 0 (n CL 52 DI W a a 0 0 a m 0 a STA. 107+97.0 8)f 450' BEND (FLxMJ) CD THRUST BLOCKING PER LSD STD PLAN B-22a I I I / 1 11 LAO DIW 4""m STA I . 107+82.5 0) 8)) 45* BEND (MJ) I 0 THRUST BLOCKING PER 141 I I 11 LWSD STD PLAN B-22a I I " CL 52 a roolom DI W ,.0�111 U) I11­11",,i,, 1�1""I".1111"', STA. 107+07.6 I 8 ff 45* BEND (MJ) z THRUST BLOCKING PER -- - LWSD STD PLAN B-22a I I I I mj , / / I I 0 / 1 FM= . I I a . I I I ! 11 ,� i I , t I f I " " � ,� iii \ � '' , \ 1� \­1 � , �, I 11 � ill 11� 1, �, ',,,,, I ­�, " I., "I'll", I'll '�'1111`1`111 - ­11111" __�_ I I" 1, , 11,_11" I•.. .... __ " "11---1, " 11 11 "'� 11­ ,___1 , I ", � 11 I .... �"_ 11"", , _­, " 11_ "I ­11.1111 1, I ­­­ I-I �­ ,�',,�� ,I", ,- ­­ 111111-l'., - \,"", ,��, ­11. 111-1-11- � ,-- �­­_­__ ­ 11"", __ ", ­ _-, 1,",_,", 1-11-11-1 ­ _,"", ......... ,­­, I "I'll"", ­­_', ­­ ...... 11 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY '111",� " ­_­-11 - � . i V P, , � I '­ ­ 1, I f � ,,, I " I � ,,, ".,:_,`�­ , ,,, "11 1-1 I " , '111� %111, """, ­ I __-, "".", �­,, I I'll I - I , " I ­111'' I " ''I - �­­­ I I '__" ,_­�tz,.,__ __ `­, ­_. ----__",, , ­­­ 1­ __ ­ -I--- " ­ 11, �, 117 1. 11­1111. __11, "",_-, - ,­­,", � - 11111.11­ :. __ � � ­1 " " � I ": ", �, ", '_,""', 11) 8)) X 611 TEE (FL) 11 I , t 11-11111-111 1­," k `­­ , "­­­ '"'11111 "'. ­ - - ­` `­­­ """"' 1___' -_ " --- I � I " , " ", . 11, I I I " , �, 'I, " " "' , I 1­1_1___ ­ _­"l-_ , 11 '­ ...... "'1111111 ''.. �, _­__., ­�­ ----_ ­­ "1111.11-, i , , 11111i'� ... ... � t 11 '� ,ii,­­11­1 ", """,", "" ­111­1 ��,� �:) I � ....... ­'4 . ....... ... _­,­ �"_ � 1-1111­ _­111-, ­1111111, I I I , � � I , , , � i, I `111", 1, ­11117�1 11"..'­,"'t �1111__� ­-­ �­11� 1-1-_ ,i , " -_ ­ I ­1111111 1111111 " � 1, � ,7 , � ,,,, 1­11, t­__ " ­1­11", "I'll'-, 11-1_111­ , ___.�,�� �,�,,, � _', , "' 1_�"`�,�­ , (1) 8" GATE VALVE (FLxMJ) ­­_'�,�,,,,,�,�""�"-, I 11 ''1111- '' ____ �j 11 � , `,,%',;­ I I 11� tt / I '' �t t" "I - , , , 1�`t, I ,i�, 1\11- " I � , I '11, , 1, , I "" , __ I ­__,-.­�,;_ - - ­,­_ � ­1111111 - -, I'll �:,I "'_"' ,1 I I " ______Zr111111 I I � _ , 111-__ ­'­ - _�� -_ ____ I _ '­­­ I-, __ 1-11 "', __', 11 � , ,,,,,, � �­�4'_ ... ...... .. ��,,, I 1.1", -­­.,'i­­­­ ­­_ � ........... __� ____ 11-­_ ,� --�- 111-1111" '""' �:, I '_ ... - �­,'�", 1�,,, " ��L 11­_ I . ", , 1­1- """"" ­"` 1�111 "I _ ­, � .... ...... -11111"" "", _ , �, ­11 _,___ __ ....... � ", I ......... "" I :­­' -­­­ i'll, -,,, ,--. 1­1111­ '1/ 4-,,­_.__ 1 � "". ­11" ­1111.1­ � ,, ,�­(`I) 6" GATE VALVE (FLxRJ) '­­_ __"�' , I I I 1111-1-11111 - 1.11 11 .11.111­ .... 111.11.1111.111,11-1 ­­1­1_ ­11111_11 _ I 't_, __­` ­­_ ____ '___11 ­,"',­ 11111111­ ­11111-1111 ­­'­_­_ 1-1 \ I" 111111.1- ._"" t � � � , , , 11 " t� I ) �, � , !", �1' I " " ? ,� I )� I � " I , , , " 1-1, 11 "I �,," "t", I I \" , " �, 1__��N`�", '1�1, I I '11",",", 1­111_1_ " '111111, " _,__ ", I "I'll, ­1 ,­_', , ­' , 1111-1 -,""I'll __-4�� ........... I I'll, - - - ­� I , _111 - _____-LL 1___­=��,_ I "..".111 _ 11 � ..... ... . � ,.", �­,, 11-1-11", � I 1, ­­__, '_,�,_, "I'll'," 11111__ ­­­ ­­­11 I "It"1111 ­!­_ I I � , I � ­ ......... 1­­1' I 11­_'.­�,,­'_ ", - I � � __�_ , _ '' I ) ____ _"_,_, ­11111- 1 _,__� - ­­­�._ 1-1--l"', _1111111111- -1111_',,� ,� � .. ..... (1) 8" ADAPTER (FLxMJ ­,"",­,4�1 __ , ­­11"', "111",_, ) """"" '___ ", " I—— "� � i 1- � ,,"I'll" , �"' 11-­11- ,I.-,,.,,,,, ­­­1111,11 11 \ i"'111 ___ " � "----,, _­", I 1, _111, �, 1 �, '' ­-, ___ -S., "' \ ''I 1111�', I I I � It I i,;' � , , 11 I ; I 11, , -I �­­ I , , I � 31 I , � , � ,Vv , � , I I "I 11 `�,, I 11 t�k I , '' � , 1�1� , I , �,'' 11 I I 1, "I'll, -11 ­1 ,, ­ I',, "", 11 """I", " It, ":":, � `- ­­,",- "I'll -tq- " ,,�, ­'­M _ , i � � """', , " I I �i_l 1­1111 I'll ­11 __;z - , _��� -_ ____�­ 1, ­ I I 11, "I �,___ _ �, _ : I � 1, , I ........ .. � , ­111�11­ __ ...... � . ........ _� I I ___'.L��___ ­_1111 �') " ""', 1­_� ­" , ­111­'. �11'­� � , " ,,,, ,,,, ", I . __­111­__ ­­,­ ��',�� /,,� / . ... ........ � , "I",", _, ��, I'll, ­­' I '_11111111 ­_,".. ­___ �!",� � � �, ., '­1111", " - _"__ ", , "I I I ""' I ____ , -1.111 I , I ,, 1, 1111ill-11­11111 I'll, I ", �_�� ­, _"" 111111, '' �­­_, I 11111-1 ___ _ 11 -111, _1_11­ - - '11-1111111 1.11 ...... .. I") - . ....... - ­__, I "" 11"",­ ­­­', 1.1111-111 ­­.. (2) BOLLARDS ­1`111­ _'. ____ _,_ ­­1­1 11­111111­ --I'll, ___ I .... . .... `­_ �11111�. , ­­_ ___ "I'll", - ---- - �,,�__', � I'-- "I ­ ­­1 ... ... � _,"""', _1­11 ­­­ / 11 1 _­­, ­­ 1, % �111­1_11 % - `�1_111, - " ", " ­11", � ", t`, 1111_1_ I .",­,", "" %, '� � ­­­, '�� � - \, ­_1­­­_­_ ­­­­ ',­�z, 1,� ,,, " , \ , '­�­_____ �, ". ", ­11-11 _ I _�,,, ',_� � �', N1, "', ', , I 1, , , 1 'I , , i . ,, i � \1, , , ,I Z i . I � � I , 1, I I I _­ ,, 1�) i/ : . � � I ", � ___� _ ___', - ___ - ------ �­,_,, ,�� - �11_�. ,1 __ �� - _, ), , "I - '�,_,__­j ­­\ . . ....... �­ ",­­, j , , ­­­__ -1-11 ­­�'=-­­­�-- 1�1-. � - �:�11_ PER R LWSD STD PLAN B - 1 9 a - R ____ __.-,..---- - - '­­_ I •�. "' "" __ - ,�' ,' �', , - 1� ,,,,,,,,, �� ��,,', '' 11 , 1 1� , � ,� I'll � � � ,� ", 1, I 1­1 I \ ", \ ' "I" , " \ "Is - ` � � I I I � li( if � / i � I I , , I I t , , I � ': I 11 11 ! I I - " � I , I I ,� I 1.11 I 11 __111 11, ,ill _1­11 11 / "I", , 1`1 " _11111, � " I "'.", A �.,,,­­ ­1 - ii,,��__��, __ ,.�� I""' - -, , , .­­11­1 ­"'- - - ,',;4� - __1 , ,, 1, _ - ", "I - - , 11 _� 1', -- I " -,.,�, _-L, ­ ­,"I'l ­­­­ I 11 ,� " ---, ,� " " I " 1 �, `11",� " il)� 'i _, I , '. ". "1111�� , � , � "',-­� , '' ', " 11 � N � "', "" "I','' %, 1� I'll I I'll, , I , \11, � ��,11",�I , , I , , 1,; ,�,,, 1, 1% , � ", " . �`.'' '", 111\,� 11 , "I %,', � _; , �, ,,, - IN, , I , "I, ,�,, I \ '11, ­ ' I \ �� , , � "', \ I I I , - I _�11 � ) 1, I I , I � , I i1, � I I �1111111 � .11"', I I '', /,� �1, I I I 1, "I" I I I "11- �­ 1. , I N � / - r� " - I I , ",,, , " ,; I � ", 11 , I f I I ', 1, I , �,/ I � ­',�,, ��,�, \ I ''I'll'' \", , �1 "', � , \`1 11 , - I 11 ­1 \ "'t" �, \ , � I I \ ,�, 1� 'IN, N 1­�', I I " tI WOOD � j , / 11 / I / I � �,, " 'i " \ \ 11,3111, I '�,;, 11 � S " "I I I I � ` 1, I � \ "I I I I I " I 11 1�1, "I ��,,�J, " : ,,,, Z,'.',,, , , "" _1*1 ,�,,�, ,, *­ I ,,, It 11 - llf� � I 1, V,""', \ �, " ,,,,�._ - �� \ \. t I", "I � ,,, "I, , \ "I "', I\" � \ 11, , I I � I'll" , 11 'I', , "'. \ , � ,� _ "'il- ,, , , Wry 1�1 \ " `1`_1 I �,I-11 11 -,, I "'t "I ,, "I "I"\1 I � , 1� ,, ) I ­ I 1�11 Z ( � \ "I" \ 111,"�,, 11 I 1.1," '111� \ i\", 11, 11, 1� I 111 INI.,­% , BRIDGE Ij � 11 � , � 111� \ 11 I" I 1, �\ 1 ,,�,,,_,,�­ I � 1� I'll," , , 'I,' \ � N Al� �,,, 1�1 ,� 1'� A, I `11 " , � �1,z , I � i, ,�",., I � ! `­11, -�,, I I I 1� ­1111, , ''I, , ,,, ", I "I ­­­ � 1 ''I'', �1, I 1�, " "I 11 1� , 111111111111111 _­." __ \ x � t ", .11711 I I I , 1, 11, 11��, I "I ", '1�1, �­ I %� I "I I �' ", N ��"O \ I " , 11 ,, ­%ts I 11' I I 11,11111­ "I'll, : I "', , 1, , . , \ �11� , "•, I ", \ , ,,, I ", ­ - I __;;�_ 1110 oft . gum -gam , � a === tummum"mm 1 40=11,11011mammmino "11 '�� _ I \ I __-W�mi v - I 11 1�1 ,�,,, , \ "I \ ­,"', 11 IN \11 �, '11, I ,% I � , \ 11 - t " il �, t , "I ;t, -TV, I \ �__ 20 0 10 20 44 I 0=0 ^ I ocale 1 l",.4�zolll --l-l" I � I I 11 E, Dtate,d �,kCTPPR01,7'ED FOR t.ONSRI; 7. ,. ,. ON SUBJECT TO CHANGES NOTED . . , ­ . The D,Istridl reView is, not a colifirm, aeon of anay d1i'liell,51-011 ,or I ,qi,.mt,if1es ss-lown m' the pilmis ,and will not, relieve. the DueveloAer I or Em'giiileer f�ro,iii:r,e�,sl,�GIY,-,'i,tl�ilit,7y for �P'kmi error's- 2N,"'o dian,ges, Shall , , � be madeto, the plans, except� with tht consentofthe District - . � I 11 � 24-111 I'll I 4 I I I I I I I I 114mosUr"m I Mfg= Niiii�ii� , ,�, I " I I '111, `Itt�t.Wll I - 77T�N-��,,,,,��,,,,,,,,,,���,��,;��",,�,,,'�,'�,,""��,,,,� ,,����,'i,:�,,,',',",,'��,",�;y ',,,,,,',",�,,,,,,,,,,t�,,,��,,,,,,,,,-��%""?,��,,,�,i,�,�,,�,,��,,�"I"�?,�,�""",����,, 1'1­"',*A'11141'n��, '11Q �,,,,�,�,,,,,,�:�,111"""""����-,,,�,,��,,�,�""�,,�:,',�, ,,,, ,, .�l,,,,,��,"�,��,��i��,,�,,';,�,,,�l,,,���,41,1���,,�, ,:,�,,,�A�,,��3,���,,,,,,,"��,�,,,��,,;,�,�,�,1,"A""","�e�,,c.j,,�,�,,,,�.;,,',,�,,,,,,,, - � -I.- � oolk u mmmmmomomm" dommom d1mum PROPERTY LINE �_) "' ") . "''_'31'-, _�. 'I, �,-� ­_, ,R,.'. ,_.-R�._­. EX CONTOUR (INDEX) t,� ,� - - 1_111­`,''� I-) 1, `11 . ...... �, 1­'_ ­1­ X CONTOUR 11 11 I I-, 12-130 "I'll", 11-11"", " 11111-111111111 NT URP SED CO O (INDEX) _____ 231 --- - PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION FF 78.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING 11,11,1101ill Ill I I PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE F_­ ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT ,_­­,_,_,_­­-----,--,-,---,---- I -------,.�--,.-.-,�-..-1--,------ 1"""I�11.11,�11.111, -------------,] - ,,�1-1--l��-.'.."--.-� ------ ­__­­­­ ____ (AC) PAVEMENT -,-,---"-",-,---"-,- GRAVEL SURFACING I I SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB 11-1-1-11-1- I CURB AND CUTTER PRE -SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER 610 QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD IAREA/YARD 1111,11,1731111, I ; ,,,', "", ,,,, I t ,, , -, 'I CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 � , ,"_,_,"N1,, , I , 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 ��'��,,�''�',,�j .... .. I "t, �t��,�­,if,� 4i , , :�1��::��, , , " ,,� "I � 'i I , t1t '1iip", �,, - ,, , , ,, I I I �, , I I �: ,,,�� ��!­ STORM DRAINAGE PIPE I , I I , ,,,,,'�, ,,­� �,�,,t t�,,�,�­�­� ,,,',, ''c" �:,� i�,� �t_� , � " I , , "I �,:',�� ",,'�'-'���,��,'���,'���,'�,',",',','�',�;"', j", ; �, ,"::",�,�� ��:k ��,:'­'�,�,�,!�A FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN , .... . ... . ­'­,",'", I ­�_ 11"'), 1 ) ��,,I1�1�1� '''', � 'A'� K I , I i DETENTION FACILITY � a"'�"I-I�'I'lI ...... 11,,,­�, � i�ll'�'il"�,,��,,,��!"��)(",,*�,�,'��,�,�,i,�,,,-,�i.,i,.,�,,,,-�,R,�.,�,�,,��-,,,,,,�.,,!,,-a,".��i.,""', Q STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT 4� ,, FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT ,, ,,,,,� DOWNSPOUTS , . ; y""�,,I,_;�u " I ,... �,I.­­ � I ­­ ­­_­1­­­1­­.1 ... 1­­_­_,1­­­ ... . �,,-",".�'llI.-I"�"-,,..>.'I "I I I SIDE SEWER PIPE I � i SEWER CLEANOUT i "_7'������� SIDE SEWER CONNECTION ,,,,� "I, "'�:' I" i� ',�-� t I "" '/ SSMH %, , \,� ........ 11", _"_.,i.1------ BOLLARD 0 FIRE HYDRANT I , , z , I , , I , I VIATER FITT11GS WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE 3: 0 . "�,",�",,,,",',,,,,"',���,'�,,,,,�*,-"",: f',­r_ _-, -FIRE SERVICE VAULT y,1-';"-,;-`,-,�;:,i1 ____0, r�` ,,-%, , -_t1v'v%1 , " � FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION --A.. - �SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FORI � ITY CROSSING INFORMATION ! I i 11�tl co QQ C) m It- CC (* ,_ m ZZ) m Q) (O U.j . "".." W (0 � " , - :D W (0 "I X< Q) _ C)U- " cc %c C1 I-r-1­ Wm - ") �-V- - =)m 0 0 1 00 _CN �_ Lu to, W,,� W co f--c:> (1) Cn Cq 1._� z .. I - < uj M Z 0 X ]�_ :r -1 CL 0 Cn W _j f-- UJ V_ F_ I'll i . . I ' I'll I��� I I m P , I 111 A 01 , 71A2.S�77 N-,.�,�/,, I , vk\I , � � I 11 I -- ` & ISTVN A _ I , , f, A ;___ 61 \� A ' \ I'll E 0 Q ( CD V mi =3 00 T­1 .,qr = CN 6 C= *= W 0-1 M ml�z <.& W (n CD I rl*%� 0*1 o . i3 -a a.. r-4 aj m CD C> smwmmwmm I IVIII CL 0) C= L. (V Qj C= IIIINNwIMII IIIIUNIIINNIU 0) = = Is I 11 I I I I -, � , , ,, � , � i , I , I � 1, : I , , I 11 � I I I , , I I , � , I I � � I i , , , � "", it "' . I I " 11 , � I , ,1' I � I I , 11 , I , , � � 1�1� I I 1, � " � , I I I I ,� � , ` , , "I � I , , ,� �,, il, � � , 1i , •1� -1 I 11 "I " ...... I ...... � �, " I I . 11 � I � I I � � 1�ii:,,, �,,, , , , ',,�`�t� 1� t�:,� , , , , � L I I ,t � I " I I"'a,. I',, �) , I. „ 1� ,1 1, I .. � , ' I " , I I 11 I I i ,,, "i I - , t , , I I I I I " "I 11 I , 'i I , 1� �,�� 1��, t", , Ili it' ` � " ill � I , ,- ;� "t, ` � " t, , " , � � , � "'t, , I , , , , , , , , , , , I I I I , I I I I I I 11 I " t " : , I ,mi I , , I , I I , I I I '90 , I I I I , 11 11 "• 11 i,f I , "I , , � I II Date.- 04/15/2019 Job No.: � 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: I I SBP � : I � � � Revisions � I i j I I Date # : I I � Description I I I � A� 4/15/2019 I : I I t � ADDENDUM I : A � 6/21/2019 I � L/PERMIT i � � Ut I i � , RESUBMITTAL #1 f' , � - I 110, I *� I ,"Ill , �L � N_ NGVD 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH T. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90 1 WATE lrol 0- OTE Z JTE M N T THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 'WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDSAPPROVAL BY THE WASHINGTON SATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ON JUKE 8, 1994 AND ANY ADDENDA THERETO. 2. PIPE IS 8" DIAMETER, CL52 DIP. COVER 3' MIN OR 12" ABOVE TOP OF VALVE OPERATING NUT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. VrY 3" RPBA IN ABOVE GROUND ENCLOSURE 19 LF 3" CL 52 DI W CY) ti 10 **4W­,*lQ4" '14 Fan" RKINC11'4' W 0NNWVd 0111N 3NV "mm*40 son=* "Wom "W"No *..mft 0. F— Z Lu 0 ... ...... ... ........ 50 No yu rb F, a W�iater Plaul: SeAlrer plall D,:Lited _kPP'R O.ATED FOR lCONSTR1TC"TION -SUBJECTTO CHAINNGES NOTED The District V S "!review is''not za t"'Onfirmation of 'any dimension Or qu,mitilles &hmn. �i. the plimis rand will trot !relieve the Developer or Enc-rineer fimn responsibility fob Lan ti-rors - N-No clul ages, shall, P be numie to, the plan--,�- except with the conssent of the District X T slim" P. PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION FF 78.0 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN I x"ll CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE L"A FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN It, (i"A a DETENTION FACILITY J?4 STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION .... ....... SSMH BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION ,SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR lUTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION '-t co LW C) m V_ 0cc 0) co LW W CD C%4 < W X U- C> ui W Vd < uj Z 0 D C)- 0 C/) W _j W 40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ IMMIM x t q ....... .. 77,1� . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 77 Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: B P Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019, ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 LINE SIZE ENCLOSURE MODEL (4) MOUNTING RPA MODEL (4) LOCATIONS PAD SIZE 3" DOMESTIC WATTS WB—N3 1000W HEATER (FIBERGLASS) 82" X 38" WATTS LF 957 OSY WILDWOOD ONLY 6" FIRE WATTS WB—E4 1900W HEATER (ALUMINUM) 102" X 44" WATTS 957 RPDA OSY ALL IRRIGATION * N/A SIZE TBD WATTS LF 957 OSY ALL ADJACENT 2" BELOW TOP OF "` 'OOL (FL), .H LINE ID MATCH PER PLAN (TYP) 505 ....... ........ 50 1 5 5m 000 .... ..... .. .............. .......... ...... N ROWOF S ROW OF AQ5C S 300T S`"tQ5 . . . 30.00 30.00 QO QO EXISTINGdug= 485 GRADE FINISHED GRADE—: -j Qu TO SITE 01 47 mom 470 EX 2" GAS 470 470 ...... ...... 465 ............... ........ 0-) co Ln �- ,.�,re) N. . . . . . .Ln cc co. . . . . . CO Co. . . . . c CO . . . .CXD CO. . . . . , . CO CO . . . . . . . C co Q 0..... L ......99+80 1AOO+00 LLJ Lj- IL V IL0"'o' 0*' F �,AL m E 4)INI SE A"TIOIXI I'l 24 T H P`L 0* C" "I" 'TE t NOTES: 1. POSITION ASSEMBLY IN ENCLOSURE PER ENCLOSURE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS 2. RPBA'S AND VALVES SHALL BE ON THE WA STATE DOH APPROVED LIST 3. COORDINATE WITH ELEC FOR PROVISION OF ELEC SUPPLY SERVICE AND CFI OUTLET FOR HEATER. INSTALL OUTLET AND HEATER PER MFR RECOMMENDATIONS 4. OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. KITS HEATED ENCLOSURE AND RPBA 50%5....... 50%5 ............... S ROW OF ��� N ROW OF c ;iU(� I�H ST S 300TH ST 500 500 .......... ..... ..... 29.75' I 30.04' 495) 49 ...... .... .. 490 ... 490 FINISHED I� GRADE � 480 ( EXISTING I ...... ...GRADE � _ 480 � o TO SITE 480 475 470 j EX 8;, SEWER... j EX 2" GAS j 470 _ _ _ _ _ 470 j 465 j 465 ............ ..........__ _ r�O. o'J O NN ...... CO mod-. . Ln Lf7. Ln rn 00 00 . 00 00 . . . . 00 . cb 00 0D pp co 00 W LL. W Li . W l.L 11 J Li W L� 115+00 115+80 1"=20' H; 1'=5' V S ECTI0"' ON - 26TH AVE S lliTEKIISECTION 5 NTS N 01" T U S" ED" Lm 00 LQ c+ c-co cc �- m Z 1 00 tV W ct> H 04 w U) >C c:> 1 c> W `n t-- r- (/a a OQ m� W (O CK Cl) Q uj Z Q, 0 (/) w t-- w r-- 4 a* ... s j . s. �a w w`rlillll �.,M�IMN��I�IIII Date: 04/15/201 Job No.: 2173 Drawn y: C I L Checked by. SBP ■ 1.eYisiVns # Date Description ADDENDUM 03 2 �) \f�jj Y✓ 1 LU/PER IT 1 RESUBMITTAL 1 WATEM All ru*"*AET,..l L P� 77� 'lj a Is % 0 1 j rm% m 9 L ulm D S T A ON" Fft m"s)" A IF P L A'Na'm t` * k; A "r"' h F rm" L I kol ;" k A Pto j*4 L E T 0 A APPENDIX A PLAN ID TITLE I AST UPDATE PRIVATE SERVICE SS-01 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL 08-02 X SS-02 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STEP AND COVER 08-02 X SS-06 SANITARY SEWER PIPE BEDDING . . . ... ........ 08-02 X SS-07 SANITARY SEWER SIDE SEWER STUB 08-02 X SS-09 TRENCH DAM 08-021 X APPENDIX B PLAN ID TITLE LAST UPDATE PRIVATE SERVICE N/A SIDE SEWER INSTALLATION DETAILS (2 PGS) 11-01 X LAKENAVEN 'u'lTIL"ITY DISTRICT A 1 0 'I'L It I NDARD N uAo"')TES 0 G A v ITY SEWER CON RUCTION — - - ...... . ... . . . .. ........ .................. ..... . ....... 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF LAKEHAVEN WATER & �,,`;EWER DISTRICT AND WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION/WASHINGTON STATE CHAPTER AMERICAN PUBLIC W01`�KS ASSOCIATION (WSDOI-/APWA) "STANDARD PLANS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION," LATEST E(,)ITION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY Tl­IIS WO[�K AND SHALL NOTIFY APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES TO FIELD —LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES BEFORE STARTING ANY EXCAVATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH RCW 19.122. 3. CONNECTIONS OF NEW MAINS TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE TEMPORARILY SEALED OFF UNTIL AFTER UPSTREAM CONSTRUCTION IS TESTED, CLEANED AND ACCEPTED. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND WATER SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO OPENING THE SEAL, WITHOUT FLUSHING THE DEBRIS DOWNSTREAM. 4. GRAVITY SEWER PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH WILL HE"' ONE OF THE FOLLOWING AND NOT NECESSARILY INTERCHANGEABLE: 5 (4 5 F,,,,,-, 67 9 �,`,",'D 5 (18 1)0 AND LARGER) POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D-3034, SDR 3 "THROUGH 1 OR AST M 5 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) AWWA C-900, DR-18 (4"THROUGH 12") OR, AWWA C­­90!`,,"`�, . ...... f18 (14"T[lROUGH 36") HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) ASTM F-894, WITH GASKETED JOINTS ,j,,"I­(`) 4011"'CERAMIC EPDXY DUCTILE IRON ANSI A21.51/AWWA C-151, MINIMUM CLASS 52, EPDXY —LINED Will] 1" 1`411)'ll"I"' ("t N) t3LDDIN(.,)* FOR RIGID AND FLEXIBLE 5. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE (A.K.A. 5/8"CRUSHED ROCK) SHALL BE USED ["Of" [11PL, GRAVITY SEWER PIPE. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE' PLACED UNDER THE PIPE TO A COMPACTED DEPTH OF N, PIPE), AND TO A COMPACTED DEPTH OF 6"(FOR PIPE GREATER THAN 27"). THE MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED COVER THE TOP OF FLEXIBLE PIPE AND TO THE SPRINGLINE OF RIGID PIPE. TO ASSURE UNIFORM SUPPORT, THE MATERIAL SHALL BE CAREFULLY WORKED UNDER THE PIPE HAUNCHES WITH A TOOL CAPABLE OF PREVENTING THE FORMATION OF VOID SPACES AROUND THE PIPE. 6. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF RELATIVE DENSITY, OR GREATER IF SO SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE ROAD AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION, FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE EXCAVATION TO THE SURFACE. DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS INCURRED FOR COMPACTION TESTING. 7. TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED PRIOR TO TESTING SEWER MAIN PIPE, AND SIDE SEWER STUB(S) SHALL BE AIR TESTED AT THE SAME TIME AS THE SEWER MAIN. 8. MANHOLES SHALL CONFORM TO WSDOT/APWA STANDARD PLAN B-23A, TYPE'l OR TYPE 2 WITH ECCENTRIC CONES, AND INCLUDE 1—INCH GALVANIZED DROP SAFETY STEPS OR POLYPROPYLENE SAFETY STEPS (LANE INTERNATIONAL CORP. PART NO. P-14938) AND AT LEAST ONE (1), AND NO MORE THAN FIVE (5), FOUR —INCH (4l)) HIGH ADJUSTMENT RINGS BELOW THE FRAME AND COVER. ALL MANHOLE EXTERIOR SURFACES SHALL RECEIVE A PROTECTIVE COATING OF BITUMINOUS COAL TAR TO A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 50 MILS, APPLIED AT THE FACTORY. WHERE NOTED ON THE PLANS, MANHOLE INTERIOR SURFACES SHALL RECEIVE A CORROSION PROTECTIVE EPDXY COATING OF: POLYSHIELD SS-100@(BY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC. (LAKEWOOD, WA); 50 MILS MINIMUM THICKNESS); OR RAVEN@405 (BY RLS SOLUTIONS INC. (OKLAHOMA); 100 MILS MINIMUM THICKNESS). ALL COATINGS SHALL BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 9. MANHOLE FRAMES AND COVERS SHALL BE CAST IRON, WITH THE WORD "LAKEHAVEN" CAST IN THE TOP, SHALL WEIGH 140 TO 150 POUNDS, AND SHALL HAVE A SINGLE 1—INCH LIFT HOLE FITTED WITH ONE 3/4" X 3" GALVANIZED CARRIAGE BOLT WITH BURRED END TO RETAIN THE NUT AND A FLAT WASHER TO ALLOW FOR 1" BOLT TRAVEL. COVERS SHALL BE 25" IN DIAMETER. 10. CONCRETE COLLARS REINFORCED WITH WIRE MESH SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DISTRICT STANDARD PLAN WHERE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 11. MANHOLE CHANNELS SHALL BE PRODUCED TO THE FULL DEPTH OF THE ASSOCIATED PIPE DIAMETER AND TO A WIDTH NO LESS THAN THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE ASSOCIATED PIPE AND NO MORE THAN %—INCH IN EXCESS OF THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE ASSOCIATED PIPE. MANHOLE CHANNELS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH FINISH. TO MINIMIZE TURBULENCE, SIDE CHANNELS FROM INLET PIPELINES SHALL BE CURVED TOWARD THE OUTLET PIPELINE TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH LAMINAR FLOW TRANSITION FROM ALL INLET PIPELINES 0 THE OUTLET PIPELINE. CHANNEL MATERIAL SHALL BE A SHRINK— RESISTANT GROUT MIX, USING 6SACKS PER CUBIC YARD PORTLAND CEMENT AND 7/8" GRADED AGGREGATE. FOR GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEMS 15"AND LARGER, PREDL@MANHOLE LINER SYSTEMS BY PREDL SYSTEMS NORTH AMERICA, INC. (BURNABY, B.C.) SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR CHANNELS, FLOORS AND PIPELINE CONNECTION SYSTEMS FOR MANHOLES. 12. MANHOLE SHELVES SHALL HAVE A BROOM FINISH, AND BE SLOPED %—INCH TO 1—INCH PER FOOT TOWARD THE CHANNEL. 13. PIPE ENDS OF ALL INLET AND OUTLET PIPELINES SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN 2 INCHES INSIDE THE MANHOLE, AND ALL PENETRATIONS SHALL BE SMOOTHLY GROUTED AROUND THE PIPE WITH SHRINK— RESISTANT GROUT. 14. NO JOINTS FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE INLETS AND OUTLETS SHALL BE WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE MANHOLE, AND PIPELINES SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE MANHOLE WITH PVC MANHOLE COLLARS. FLEXIBLE BOOT COLLARS ARE PROHIBITED. 15. SIDE SEWER STUBS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A GRADE OF AT LEAST 2%, AND THEIR TERMINI SHALL BE AT A DEPTH ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE INTENDED PROPERTY, CAPPED AND MARKED BY A WHITE 2X4 POST LABELED "SANITARY SIDE SEWER." STD NOTES FOR GRAVITY SEWER CONSTR-08011 l.DOCX (JUNE 27, 2003, UPDATE 12/30/16) m a m aw A , s� " KEY PL AAN P JURISDICTION, LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT FIRE PROTECTION AUTHORITY: SOUTH KING FIRE & RESCUE ZONING: RS 7.2 LOT SIZE: 9,39 ACRES TAX 1. D. NO.: 0421049167 It V` E R T I C A` L D A T Um'hm NGVD 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAI_ 1:3ENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CA��F AT INTERSECTION 0[­ 20TH AVE S & S 298TFI ST. 1 5 0 8. 9 0, El_ E t UTILITY NO S 1. SURFACE UTILITY FACILITIES ARE SHOWN HEREON PER FIELD LOCATED VISIBLE EVIDENCE. THERE MAY BE UTILITIES THAT EXIST ON THIS SITE OTHER THAN THOSE GRAPHICALLY DEPICTED HEREON. 2. UNDERGROUND (BURIED) UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON COMBINATIONS OF VISIBLE SURFACE EVIDENCE, UTILITY LOCATOR MARKINGS AND RECORD DATA (SUCH AS AS —BUILT OR UTILITY DESIGN DRAWINGS). ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE AND, IN SOME CASES, ARE SHOWN AS STRAIGHT LINES BETWEEN FIELD LOCATED SURFACE UTILITY FACILITIES. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY HAVE_ BENDS, CURVES OR CONNECTIONS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN. 3. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND FEATURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM FIELD SURVEY BY AHBL, MAY 2018 AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT COMPLETE. ADDITIONAL SURFACE FEATURES AND IMPROVEMENTS BEYOND THOSE INDICATED ARE PRESENT AND IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF ALL EXISTING INFORMATION AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER UTILITIES AND SURFACE FEATURES NOT SHOWN HEREIN WITH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE PLANS. 4. ALTHOUGH LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES BASED ON UTILITY LOCATOR MARKINGS AND RECORD DATA (SUCH AS AS —BUILT OR UTILITY DESIGN DRAWINGS) ARE DEEMED RELIABLE, AHBL, INC. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF SAID DATA. 5. CALL 1-800-424-5555 BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION. ILE "v" MAP LEGA` L DES(,,.,�;RIPTION NOT TO SCALE (PER CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TITLE GUARANTEE NUMBER 0119605—TC, EFFECTIVE DATE MARCH 21, 2018): THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W'.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,- EXCEPT THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7202150467. A Avg& A %440j 6 fw% A N%A I wimm BE" Rl NAD 89/91 WASHINGTON STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH ZONE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY HORIZONTAL CONTROL HOLDING COUNTY MONUMENT NUMBERS 100 AND 119. POINT NO. 100 N=1 18491.72 E= 1273293.33 CASE MONUMENT AT SOUTH 320TH ST AND PACIFIC HWY SOUTH POINT NO. 119 N= 125715.24 E= 1274764.57 CASE MONUMENT AT 20TH AVE SOUTH AND SOUTH 298TH ST. SHEET LIST TABLE SHT NO DESCRIPTION C— 350A SEWER COVER SHEET C— 350 SEWER OVERALL C-351 SEWER C-352 SEWER C-353 NOTUSED C-354 SEWER C-355 SEWER DETAILS SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR �UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION 00 co 00 N UJ (0 Qz a ui 00 _(N Lu (0 W U) z < W z 0 0 U) W 490 40 4 40 va Ift NJ, �,777* Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description �Z 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1, SEWER COVER SHEET A NGVD 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. PUBLISHED ELEVATION.- 508.90) 0 .. .......... T_ " Aff NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BT THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. o' 71 if fl�l OOS/SEWER I THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 'WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS' APPROVAL BY THE WASHINGTON SATE #EPARTMENT OF HEALTH ON JUNE 8p 1994 AND ANY ADDENDA THERETO. 2 Na a 40 0 20 40 80 ticale T'40=407 C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR'l �UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION 44. co U.j C) Cr. co co (0 UJ to Cn x Ql) < U- cc: uj `ram of < W Z 0 D 0- 0 W uj 4 • 4 . . . . . . . . . . . y, 77r. Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/ zi� 20 19 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 tiEWER j! � �'. 'v""", 11 1� "��, ,,, I i , E :1 -" 11 " i'� I �,� : " 'j� , , ,, � I , I , "09 1" , , 11 I , LAKEHAVEN NOTES ----------- THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 WASHINGTON SATE MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ON JUNE 81 1994 AND ANY ADDENDA THERETO. PUBLISHED ELEVATION.- 508.90 $ , - I , -,,, I .� - �I , 11.�-1- ) I �� I '') ,'/� , 1 � ... " I , -, / "" ) � , / " V I F� ', 1`11 " I , � , I - �111 ill , I 7 - I'll , , ­11­1 -1,1111111- � , Ummam4tgramm"m I - c", I ( 1 � I I" � I "11"W'"WaVAWMA, - - - �,_�151_ B� I I I 1, I 11, ; i "I'll" "I / "'' ,I 1 I / 11115� 1 11 I _'�_ ''I I I I'll, � ,,,, , " 'I 1, I ­1­1 ,� .,�,�, 1� , , ; I � 11 � - / , , I" I , , , , I "' " - mm, i I 00 I/ I I I I I., � - "I I " , "I I I 11 � 11 f I I I , , , , , , ­11111" � 1 i +00, , I V4, I I ­'l­"_ I 1.111, 111-111,1Z I 11 I I V , _ 11 I - 11111-1 - - ­­­ - I I �10 j , � ,,W�ww," ­M, "I , _', .11 �, m,� �,, ��n I m� ­­ s, 4 11 tj"',� .", , "..",= A=b M 32 ;, I q,1 "I ----------- �_ __� I 111-1111 I � . V, V , Jl_� , � �__+ -,''I'll 111,­1111�1_" I IW11­1�11_­'...1­0- 0 Iq , `� i - / =11", "', ,�,­�­­111 ",­­11"', ­­_ "'1111,­ . 1,11 -l�,,�,,,��,,,O�,,�"-l�'- o,,,,A-'-..v_. __�, ! _V­M- I'll 1-11��,�,.�--�.�'"'�-,-,--,'',-��,�,,�,�,.�,�,�-,�,�'� "" - 1111-11-1-1- "'' 1-1- I 'fl I - le, 1111- I I'll 1-1-1-1-11 I- 77 - -------"---r,".rt'i�',",,V,,,,,,!:*:,�, _-NV � ___ fI '_­ ___� � 11.1 ­1111111 ___I, ," , 24A''q, '' V '. V) I'll, f "' 11 "I " 1%, I I I ! ", 1- I , I I 11 11 ....... I V T_ - I I -1 - , -_ I % �10 , , I ,�t I ,� F ­­ ­­". I �? Z-142RUJI1277=4 � � I " 11 "I I I r14- I 't - 1� I I I V i;,� "I"� � 1' , I I , 1 (f?i( �1! I ) i'` ,? I I ; , i , , , � I it !,,�;,) �yfi , , I.- ,� ­', I Ii /";,�"' I t, I ,� � ,I \ 11 � 'All 1� I 11 � � I , , 'I, 1 I " � � i � � I � I I it � i , 1,., � I., ,� " I , � � , � !'' � ) I . I I- � .-I i ,�,��, - , ( , , , 11 , - I I , / , " ! / "I " 1, I', � " ''Y I/ / , ," � I I z` , " V, /, i ... ­�� I I I , , I . � , , , I , \ I I I , 11, , � I I 11� I � � I I \ " I � I ­, I I ` \ , - 1'��,, " �, �� \ , I' ­", I 4 I " , I 1� . I �, �\ 1, I A I I � � I I -1 " - I , � - , , !,� t �,� � 7_ '--/ 6 77 SANITARY SEWER ,i CONNECTION TO BLD* , ,f IE 488.00 1*11 W " � ,,�,, / 11 I, ------ I � ­- , 1_1� //�� 7 - - �i".�.I.I�,�,�,iI I's "I 1/1 � ,,f IL I Z�, I , -/-_L�.�� � 11 / I" , /I , 1� , , � - �'11111�_,e, III I , � " " e "4" 1 "I, I I , /1110 1, /..... f 1 � i � , 11 i f�,,,,,,,�����.),.���,�e;,,,��-.-�,,�-,.��'l, "') � (111",4 I I 'ell 11'', I' ", , ,� , � / I �' "I � � I ',,'��,,I! , "I 1. ",__., , /I " I � , ,/ � 'I/ I � . . " v' �'/ / � I , " I I I t , , 11 / , � " 1 11 , I � _,:) �_) / ­ I I ; " � 11 , � " , _� / /I V� : ! , , , ,/ , I � � . � \ � I '\ � I I , I I i ,� I , I / � I ( I ... ) � ) I / ,� I 1I` ) , I ", , � , Lf) If " ,-a, k 10 / � / ) , I I � 1�� " 11 / \ 11, / v , 1111­,", / � � a /' , Il"", " , ""�11:, �, 1\ � I � /1, "I , , "",\ "I �,! " /1 1� � IN\ft / ­_ _111-1111111"', -11 , r,�, k" l_1I I ) , I ' 1_ ­. _ _, / 1__,-,,,,, '11,, ,, 1, , Ill , 11 \ " ,, I—_ ­­_ � �_ 1,� ... ... , 11-- I I -1- I ­11­­ 11"I'll, I 11 I 1, � 11 I'll I " ­," ­­ I I � 11 - ___, "', `­11 1, * _­,, , 11 I 1, --,--,. _1 11 I 11 ­­ " `-­­ I ." , (99,111 ", � ___ " -, '', 11 I I ­­­- �__.. "I " , _�, 11 I I 11 I'll, I'll, " ,,,,, I ­11 '. 11",'1­1,11 __ "111111, I 11­,", ­­_ -""-,,I ,� � ", I I'll "I'll'," I I _ ­­ ­­­ ­­,", ­_,-, -1,11' 1­­_ 11­1l11__ """',­ �� ­,,____. I � I 11 I'll 1, ,,, '­­-,___, "'­-­1­.,, I I I'll ­­­­ -I,.,- �, .. . . . ...... ­ � ""'11111111 "", ­,_,_,, ___ ­--�� I'll-_ ­11­111 -, � " 1 I , 11 ­\" "' , ,_ - ---. _­1,,I­____ ­­ ..... . -111, ", -, 11 11 , ll '11-111", -_ , __1 .11­11-I" ­ ", � I "'If-/` ''� ", -111, -_ �::::�:_,__�`­ ­­_1 . . ..... ­­ 1111111,_ ­­­ 1111111"-, I � / , , " " ,�, I "/, "I -"11 ­111I.-I, " , 1 I" Ile, __-, i;, I --I,.- -_ , , I ­111", --- a , I I ,-I'l­ , 11, I ­111 ­11 ��,,,;,,'," 1`11W,l ''I ammompWomm ­� r I " I I I I , I 11 11 ,, " " 1 I'll I MJL I " I � // � .X11", ,-�­--- ----,- "", - -111, - I I / '11`I­' ,P-41/�"11' I U) I I ­-1- --- -_ - I I 1 490 ­--­,,? .', I 11 11111�11'1­:­ , , , ""I-1.111-11111- .......... . ___.111_11­1I1____ ... .... __11-11-111-l'", ''I I 11 I 11 ­1 " I 11-1 "I!, ­1, ,,, , , , __ ... _11111-1111111-1 ... .... �,--�,�"-.�--,-.."--�"-",--�,�"-"-,-.,-�1-11,�..'�� .... .. - ... 1-1111-1111",­ , ....... . � W ......... I ; �Mn,,...I I W """'C,-*"""""Ill""-"'_��`__ �,,�",�""-"�, ,_11 ,� �,;;;I, ", 11 11 - 11 4��P',,�, "I', 11 I - 1,11'", ,,,'',",'''""''"',11,11,111,11I ''I'll 11,111-11, "I'll ---I'll, _'___1­,I"­­ I./" /11'�:"'11'_i ""Z''. ", '' " " I ,, V1111 11 ­11 , , "" " , �," -­" ,, I �,1, " , liv ;/. I "I "I , , ­5­ ./,, , ", �,, , �,,��,,,""I I I ,141_�111 I ..... �,' "'' , " �, � , ", " , , '' """��', 1 , '' 11 ", 'I t, , , I/ "" , ,,, '' I � I "I'', , 1� I T I I / , , I �r , I , , , I I V I I I , I , _ "" '__ I '' , " I , I "I " , 11 1 I I 1 "I I , �, ,11""� "I �, I I " ", ", , " , , , , , 1, �,,� , , " '' i"'' " 1­� 11 , " I " " ,11,111,�111 Ilk "� " -,, .",I", " , , " il I ", , " ", ,�, ,�,� I : I ­�' " , ,,, 1* , , ", , / , j', ', ',,�','��",,"" ,111,� "� I , I , , "', " , , , ,,,, I, i­,,, 1 " , , ''i " , , , , , , , �''_111`111 , " " '1­1�1"�, � � I i li,�/ ,,�,, , ,�, ", " , ", , , "�,r �-'�' i',, , I ,_ 7..... � ", "✓ ,,, " I "l, ,,,',,,,/,,,""-"""",i,, , I", ,, , ,/',/. �,,�', , J I" 11"'I" " /�"", , " / _I ,l"' "", ", , , , , " , , , 4 1 1 � "I /� Cf) J` " , " I" I �"'111�,', , ", , I , " '' /,, I " , "t , I 11 ­/ , "" ", " " I , , ,�, "" " , I " . , " , " " " _ , �P , , ,�, �11 " , , , I'll I� , , A , ,j �'I'l�Il,��,... .. . , , , ­, I I I "I " 1 I I I .����t 1 222,��IJ, t,_l z�'ZIxi-, Z, " I � � � " , i il, ,�, i "­`� , , , _1111 , " - ,�', " , � , ,� " � ,�� ,,, , �, , ",,', ,��,,t,l, ,/,""', Ill, , ", ", ,",�"'., 1111'Il ",,, ", "" 11 "I ��(,��,,��,,,��,,,��,,�,�""",:"", I 11� I I I I ", , "I �!_, I" I �`,�: """',l", ��_, I , , , , "", ,,, ,,, , � ""�_,,� ....... ,",",/ , / / , / ,,,,, ,,,, 1�111, , 1 I , , ", ,,,,,,, /l:_,l, ,,�,, �`,,, , , -, � ,,, ,,,, ,,, i ,,,, I � � '' ,/ ,'�,,,­, " "'", 111, ",' ", I "I .. .... �_�,� : 1'1'11'1111'� - , ��,�: ��::,,,', ,, " , I ,::'',�," ,,�',, ", , �Q" , ,,, , " , , _!, , , , ,", ", � ,,, , " � ,,,, "" _f�� III,"' '1�1__��,�,,,_ ,z6�,,,��",","'"""',,"I", 11111"", """I 11 ,,�,,,,,�,,,i,-,"-"O",.,e�i� I , 11� , I') ­­ , ��,,,"",",,�'I'll''''�lI - " , , , "I i � I - -, " � i 41 I I �1� � 11, r I \1 �,­ , , f .... . .. ..... -I I I I I , �:­, �i,'' 1",­_ _��*_x_,L,� ,'I e"z- , , , tz_ ��,�,,,,I � I'll _- ,-,,,,;,��.�-,�,;��,,,,,,-���",-r",��,��"-;�'ll"",�,�","*"""171��lI i I I i I ,. � 11 i � � � I I, __­ ,,, I , I I i _,"',I, _- " , " I 11 � I I I I I I " � � , I I !� I i I � I I ''I � � I " I I , , 1-111111111-111-111111 I , 111111­1 I , I � , , I , 11 1� 11 ''I'll, 11, I , , , '' , , '' ___ I , - , "Ill- I �j­­­j­­`­ ''i , , _Z',!��t " I I I I I I ­­1 )"""", ___--t I I I , , . ....... �, j � 'i �' ­­­­_­_­ , , I � 3 1 1 I'll I ''I ,�' " , " " "" .-� I �_'___�"'� I .- ...... ___I___ , -, ­11­11­11.11111.1�-1-111111111-1 kl � "I i ,[_._________ ... .. i I ''I",'' ; � " I , ­717,1111-71 I i � i �.... ....... r"I" t, , 11 1� i " , , 'I",, � � 1 � N,!" �', , I � � 4 I 'r­­,­-- . ........ ..... ­---­­­-3 LO I ,�, � I , f', , ) 11 I i f, A , '' 4 , ! i ,11 I I I 111� , 4 )k 'I, � I � ­1 11, � �, I I I i � , - 1:1 � � 1-11-1­1111, I I i , , " I I � t'�,� I � t 11 '' �_ , I , ,1111.11111,� �' � I , I � ; I ,,O 1111,_ 1111-1 11-1111-111-11"t1t , I , , )r�'____ - I � "', i � � , , ", "" , ­_* '' I 1­1 - � ..... ...... - " I'llf', , - "I'l""I'll��'�l""""","�",,�,,",,�,:""''", I � �,: " '' , I IvIf"': 11 I 11 11 � I � I 11 I I 11, 11 I 11 I ''I I'll ... """""'I ...... .... ....... "I'' I " 0 I 11, I "111L I'll, ,,,,,,-,,,,�,,,,,�,,,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,-�I ,1­111111_. 004 �,� �, - I 1V111111111 11 '__ ll, "I ­­­ i i I I , I � i � 1, I qw� I � � I J, i I � , I � i 1 1 1 1 't 4 � I � �1, I "'', "I',"""' 11.11, ==== _41- .. . ... �11­­ I'll ­______� ___ ' __ 11 � � � � I , '_ " , 11, 11 � I I i , " "" , , , "I ,\",-"",""",��,�'"'', , : " � I I 11 - I I lzll­­ , - "I", 11 "I'll, 111-11 - " <,""''", ", " " f <1 , , , - I I I I � I I,- 11 , " ", '' '''', I I'll , , " -1-11-1-1 11111- "I � f � "I "I I 14, I 11 "I....... _­v - --­ -­­­ , : � � ON� ) ll.,"""-",.,�,,,,,,,�',�"'-",,""..'�,�,�I ... . ... �."",.-,--,�"--MM�7.Mt�AMAMM=Ift,R"�,omw-tmm*--Oww,o.�','-,,--�".,-.,�,,,,--��-�--,o,�-",.,,:�,,�,,,,,,-,-�,,,,�,,,�-,�,) � �'��, , "', ) I � � 111111.111-9 " r i I � � .----.., 1­1 i Nsl"Sl I I I I """"' I I 1��1`1*1111 � I � I I I f ....... ­­­11111-111­1 '-A - __,", ___-, "I'll "I'll" I �11�11­1`11 1� 14 i I ,,'�`,�lk,4, i , " ,, ,, J_:,,,,_,,1­11 , � '', _'_.'___1_ .. ...... ___'__ 4 1 1 ­_11- .. ..... - '' , " , ", - , " " " " ", , , , , , - " __1_1 -�1,1,11,,, - " , I 0 � i � I 111. 11111­1111, 11 � I 11 I I 1� 1, I 1,��,,, I I I 11 1, � 1, ­___ I- 11�1 I 6.­1111-11111- ,,, '' , ­­­­ " , 1-1.111111-1 1, � � , - I'll, 1­11 - 111�,­­­.,­__,_ ... � I � , ; , , : " ,�­' 11 11 I" I I � I """""'"' " " ) , , ­ ­­--f .... ­­­'­­­­ �' " 4 "', __,", I ...... . � ... ... _,""""", ­­­­­­­­ il , , , "" , "" , 1*_` 11,111 � � � %', % k�,, i " - "I ''I I b. " I I � NJ I � I � ­11 I I � "' , I j � 4 ll- $1 ',,�111 1­111,11, ­,",__ ­­11­11 I ,,,, "I "___ ;, I � i _"­_,`­,­­,­­ a! I !!'I , ,___ � f, I " �__1111­ ­ * � I I , " ! i i 1 111�� , I-, "I i I I l ... 1­1­11 I I 1� N S , ,,, � " 1, 4 N i ""', � I � 11 i " , 111111111-1 " L A I � � I , I I I I I �, I I ­11[11 I j , _ I ! I I. ,,""","",�,',,'�",,��l��,,�,,,,,�,,�!I "I I I � 11 11 11 I'll I 111- I � I I I I �, - ,1_11 11-1-_ . 11 i Ml� ,­11­11­11 - 1-1111-111 "I , - V":11,­ - I 11 i 4 , , ::= I -.111-111.1111-1---, " 1,,�, " � , , , ", I ,11.,, � N I .,_­'­:­­_ "I'll-, 1_11­.1111_.11_\___', " . ...... .. I � . "I "I ­111-1 ... �,�l ... "I 11 , " INI� � I 11 �,:,� "" ) � 1,111 ­1 ­i \ " �', �, , � """, 111,111A.- 111-1 I-- " "' \ j,", "",'' " -_:�"'I", � I I i IN ­­ -:-N �,:__ " - .111-I ­ 11-1.11111- �� i I , r, "I'll-, � , , , � T- " " , "N"��L­'­ ­­_­ 1, i 1" � i , , I I " � � i : I, I I i � � I i\,-/ I I a I I I I � � I , I I I I I I I � " I 11� Ill", ­11-1-11.11.111,1­1-1- I ,�_ � ", , , I ��',,,','�i"�,,�,',"/",��,!�:��,�'�, 11 �� , , , ",:�, " � " , � I I , I (4-1101�4111'�.�11�1­1 "I�'ll""I'l�;,,�,,�,�",�,����"",� - - ".. - , , I 'I' ��.:,�-.,::-:.i�,�,,,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,�,a;,,',�",,�,,'�� � I 11111111­111".�,��,�", ��ill,�"�I'll�,�l, ­11_111­11­� 111-14--7s "I I S, 11 11 - 1­11 ­­ -""- /I " � " , si, �,��,,�: ...... .. -1-1­11,11­111111-1- I 1- � *-1-If ­­­­ .- 1-11 , � � F , " "', "' , I � ',,",� "��"!' "e, �,:" , 1:�, "I�,,�-11,�,.,�,.,-�""��,�-,�', [_�_,�,�__11111_11.11. -1-11-1-11-111 "I'll, 11111_1_ , "" 1 L , j,� � _'�, ��,,::`I �' � I ­.­­ 1111111-1 1-111111-11 ­!%��7 , �,�,,, I /�� 'f , , . � , � j ! I ! c,�` I � / i �,",� I "' I , , , I �, "'­ ­­­ ! �� / I R; , '' ­­,�,'�`�'­­', - n , :,_ J� I " . ........ * .. . ...... . .......... , .11 - ` "i"', �, � � �, - , i � I " I �-- -4 F , 1,,�, _. 11 � � � / "'. "Y , 11Z I I , ,/ ',�"'�, - __ �\ pl `%2 - ,I �_ �,,,�,':� ',� '1�ill�l "" ­­­­ "�11 � L'.__", �,,��,�,�-,I,��,�-.,�--",.,�"",�",�"")",\�,,�, ", , , ,,-, 11 ...- "i", 11 I " ��"T I �lll '�� ----".-. I., - " fx,,��o J111 1111i /" � ,,,,, � � i i� ,� I'll 1,/ , ­,",­1;f ...... '-,",,"",.".,K,�,,�,;���,,��,�1--l�'ll-IlI ��ll"��;�;��!",'\,",,',',,'��,,,,,,�,,,,,,","I �_,� , N, 11 , -��,'�-�,l�4��,'�.",'����:�,-,,.��,,,,��'�',, , % 'I \ U) I � , �'11. I " , , I , " "",:', ,f,, ,, � 11_ .. ...... _,"".-, � I" 1 � /' ,,--' � ", 11"I I ��\ r�,� �,,,,,', �,u('A% 4�1`1, ,�,' ,'�� -,,,,,,,,""',�,�,.�) f - M. "I '' ff ", " ''. e ,,�, ,,!�,- I",",,, 1� 1� " I �N'I,Ilttlll .... ..... ..... 11�1­111­1111 , , , I , �x)_�'-J'1,1' ", , , ",` " ­­' I- I A1111--l. , , '­1 � ,;7­­`� .. ..... "111'1'­.'Il­­ ­­ """ ­­'­ ....... _,� 1 ,�,,,,,",",,, ",�, I ,�,� , ,"�' " 1'1_" "l -­­­­,-,,, ­­ _�'-,' [, 1'1��P� ­', , _77-, I " ,,, I �1 " , I 111- I , , �� , ,,� _ 11""", "I'll" , '? , 11" �, , ", , , , ... ,,,,,,,, ­�:'.­�::z",-'­1111 �1-1-I'�t-I'l�---,�1-1111.-�-11-"-"-,��"",- I I I (1-I"'I'l."'"', " � '� ", "" I ,,�"',I�11 , ", , N. ;N", .." "" _\: I"', 1 , ", " ".". , , , 11/' 11 �, I I", �, II ,V " ­ X , ", , ,� ,4 ", ", ,,, , 1, �,,` ­0 . " �,( � V, / ", I'V:, I , /,""'", " ,✓", , , � , ''O'' , - I ", " "'I'll ,e r I'll '11`/"�11 1,11',"', "', ", , 1 I 11 , I " , I" " I,- ,,, zi" I /' "Il ,,�, ,177,�, "I �, " � "' " " , " <"-"W"',.,"",' " I , " , " , li, " 1, i�, , , , I �', I � N"'�' ,,,�:';:�,'�' �:""",_.�',�__,. � "",/,l " "-/ ,.,,,I- "', ,,/"',,, , , /'�'Nl " ,,, , � ,,��,, ,',,',�" I �� N �,,, w, x',�, -,,,, ,.1 ,,,- ��', ,� , ,/ , . I ,'A,�, " , , , " " , I " ,,� Y, ,,, / �,, , , � ", " , , "I" .", " ." -, " " ��,/ � , , " ,, ,,� A," fI�_., , "I,',', " I `�/��14,,. ,,, , � , 'Nll" 11" '11, " I 11-1)' , , �, " " ", - , """ , , '�,,` '1,',:'� ", � ,,,�, ✓ I,/' )`��/ , , I ", I ",:,��',,­,, * i", , ", "'' " I � -,,,, / "I- . , I - I- ,- "I" 4""",/, .,:, 11!1"�"'/�,��/ � � , I /_ " I, , , � , V/ �1� I", 'f 1�'� " " "," " /",,��- ,,* /' V �', , , ", ", , 11`:,/',�I, "I ,J " ,,, ,,,, / i" /,�,,,,, l", , / � I �, ,",,"t" , ''., -4 ,,,1,j'$ , �]"�, " " 11 ­�, ,'�,,",,", � 1`�� , "��, ,,, " �, , I'll " I , ,I , '' " , , "', I, ! , ���,.,"",i",�,,,,-�,,,�',,,, ", , , / ,, , " , "J" � , , , , "�,, , I ", " �,',"l­""'­,u " , A/ I` j` '. , , I , I "I '111�"1111' , �,, � / yi ''I ��,� " ,11, p, / " , , ',� I , "� ­ , � I � / , I , I , ,1, ','/,/ """ I,-�,'," ­,�`, J,,,,,�,�_,`,�,:_, �,,, ,,,,�,�,­�­, " I . , I I " �f , I ' "e - 11 "'' "'I"'," , _'_ ..... "", , , ,., 1111-1-11 ,,,,,,��',,,',,,,,'��,�,',,",',��\""��,�',,,,�,,,,,,,,,,',,,,'I � ,I 11 I "I'll "A' ,�, "I /, I � /,�,,, 1;3�­,,,K,��,, 1111111�' I ''I'll" 1,,�',`,�"\,�,�,­ ­, I ': , " 21,I111 � 1, , I 1� -1-111-11 , , 1, � , ✓ ;I . , - 1,11)�1711111­_, , 1: , � , / "' `�', ,,,,,,,,.,), - ,,,,i,5� " '­­.­-.­, .... I,` *' "i,",���'�'ll,�'ll,�".*, '"" _5 , , "'' ' I- Ir., ," 1/,�,,, , I ",',',-�,�--,-�', � , "N' `,,,,�,,/, �111111 , , , , " " e ­'. - ... _)� "I , , , " , " , " ,�,­,, , 11 " " ", , " " ­�:­ _ - ,z " ,��, , 11 , , , � , 11� , ,,, --,-.,,, ­­ �, ",`,�� """ , " "I ,,l,"',�', -':\ " " - ­ ­-, - , I 111-11 1�1_111 , , ,� V, 11' t, 11 , - -, ��,,��,,,�""", - , "', �),I` / \' W k' I'�'l-,�""I'���",,!,�"""","", ,,,�,,�,�"i'��,,,,��,�""�,,�,�,,,,��,�",Sz.- ­ 1, I ,�', �, ��,',"':,�', '' '' 1.11 _-) ,:: ::',:::_I,,_', -l", 4.1Z _' '_","i ,""'I"',�'I",1 ""�, , , _` """"""' , �� _11111111 ', "". "��"",���,/�,-/�lI I �_ I'll, _071 " "I ", ", ", ", ", ", ", ", , , " 'Il', I 111-1111,:l I"I", r - _,��, , I ll I ','_:, ,, " , , / .. ....... ...�­­ lc�**� ,, �, , �,,� /�:� " To 4 j �, , z / _,**� �_/ I � I , I'll, / . 111 Atli " ­ ­ , ­777�­jv 7--r77-7r,-,rr,-7n,_ 1141 7 V-:::!� �771r­­1'11�­ ... �' , ;: 6 , , =T I= =1Z71 =_7=11 .1 Z., I ' / (. : j 4 * . . � . I A Ill t, """I" � � ,`,�,,;,,,,,, ��,zl ��f",�!-' ��',,01;LA Ef""D ,,,Z,,,,3 x,�,�': �?�,j 1,'�,,,'\ !�,��,,� I '� ­�, ,�,, �,,�'1 �,% � ,,,,� , 61 Y,,flllll t',N$ ,,,,��`,', �,`I, C,';,, ""',�," "d , � �, � ,, � ,� 'I I,-,- . , I" �`� ,��1�1�11�;_ , I 1, " " , (� 4 RE � � ;k9 () 11 I , � ', 11"I'll,\1,11"'111 "! � ; 4 , / ,� ­11-1­1, "! t, b, , A I I � 11 11 I'll 4 i I / 7 ,, " 4 / K72 "_� I / 1 -7, t� I", , ,% I ir t� i� � , ­1 __ " / �_ , �� �'', l"A' 11 I -, , _1L I , t,� 1, NOT .11 -��.��4��,�li-';�,-,,Z-�-1=7�-11��-11"..'���ll-�� �'11 ,I 4 A t, 4 '�'__ A '1' 1___� t1-1 ^1 I 1 77 t�l tl L, Z-_` I 1, t, 4 _� " ,� " . ... .. / 01Fmm - �� /I gypI �, / 0 4 " \ 4 1 W � (I I <t 1,110 G I I I I NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO) SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE SEPARATE SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING, TO CONSTRUCT/COMPLETE BUILDING SEWER AND TO INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BT THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. CONNECT TO THE SEWER MAIN. - D I I -?I. 4 " 1&."p I "�1'11'11"' 4 L, 4 @ C, � , �\, � C, 4 , b. "'., 4 b 4 N 1 � I ""�, 4 N, " PVC 4 t, N I A f"N n n n 15h I f"N W A " ­ I 11 " -1 , I I'll / 11 I , "I ,,/ L "; /' Z11 , I I , I I , , I ,/ ,, I � 1 4 1 � ", N � a, �1' 1 .14 le , I-"' 4 �� ', ,� , ',�, / ��, , 11, �f,," "I '? I / ,/ , I" " , I I /1 �1, I . I /; I / I I , � I , 1, , , , I / i ", "I , I I / / I � I 11 I Know what's below. Call two business days before you dig. I , � 0 1), � � "', 1� 1, "' �,I' r f , � 1: 'R "I 2', 11 :1 � _ L i PROPERTY LINE " " 1, ,_- " � 11 ... 1. ,,.,, 19-__,­�_. * ­­__ EX CONTOUR (INDEX) _­1111- ") -1:` / I i "­,"., '_,,�__ ,�:­ �, / ­­1 _.­11,, ­­. EX CONTOUR 1111111-1 2"30"_1.11 I'll '',',I'.,,,, R INDEX PROPOSED C�ONTC�U � ­­_ 23 1 - -PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION � � , I , I I I I I EX BUILDING I I � , � ", .. .... " /1/'1 /i � PROPOSED BUILDING / //11'/// 1/ 'I I i I I -, 4 <1 17 A �1 4 A < 4 411 CONCRETE PAVEMENT <7 0 0 01 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ,4 ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT "I�.,�1-1-1---.--�-------.--,------. - ""-""","-,--,--,------------------- HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT I..... . . "",,"",--,"-L"--",-'-""--"-"----'--'----- I'll 1­11 1__­1­1­1_,____________ , " : . .. I .. . . - * '. '. . . . . . �.4 1. .. .. . .. .... - ;.." :* %. . . ,.: . . ♦.*:...,. , ". . . . . ... .. * *I"* .. . . .. GRAVEL SURFACING .. I I . , . . -1 SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER I'll, 11-11-1 11 ' *\I/* "T-­1­ , \",* E: "IllSIN/SAND FILTER Ni" QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD D RAi N f'�­,�:�­31 I 11 ; """ , ,,,, ,,�`,,`,,,, l 1`,',,��_,,: .. .. . . "" "', , i"', '' �111 �ffl] CATC I- BASIN TYPE 2 \, ... �', , , STORM DRAINAGE PIPE �:­'�, 1,�� ��',� I�_ ��,� 1,�'� ,','�� 1���� ,,�', ,� � 'I I 11 � ��, � "� i A DRAIN - , I'V, '),111 1, ,�', 0� ,,, , , 4 , ", 1'11j�-, 11","t� "N.", I'�,�, � i ,,�,'�)v "" _"Y" " )�" '11" �",.­11�,, ... ... , " � " ,q " ,,,� , ,,� R, � � 9- 1 " � : ` I ,�_ "i , � DETENTION FACILITY 21­'J', 1 ,i, � ,, "I , � I ',�, ��)O ,,-,�6 i�-:,)�'l",�,-�,�"-",�,-."","">�,�"-i�""-/,;,-"",i,cf,.-��,,t 0 STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT (11" FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT �` �,,,,,, DOWNSPOUTS co - SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT I �-.~----. SIDE SEWER CONNECTION 0 SSMH 0 0-4do-11"', ............... .. ....... ..'Plil ... . ,,,-- BOLLARD !, FIRE HYDRANT '. I i I I 11­j­ WATER FITTINGS I i � ! I il I I I I ;� - 11-1-1111111-111.1-1111 ...... i,�l�,� "' " _11_11111_111­i',�� '1� , III, " ,M,i,..... .. i � ... . 4 " ..... �­­­­­,_­'­' ­­­­­ I -1 WATER SERVICE LINES 1, S� 'f i i 111,_.*�- WATER METER I " I " i - 1­"'��� WATER SERVICE LINES U, ' *' i-I i i il j I FIRE SERVICE LINE 1� , 11 ("M7 I 'L ,(�"", ,�, "* .,. - ,,, ,��,-,' ,,,--- FIRE SERVICE VAULT 'L",�:,�,-,�,,,�,�',",��,,iI 1: ,,, �,,-,-(r-'N � _­ , *P_�� - 1.11.1 I ­ ��, q 11 ­1� ; ­1­11I­­_I11,­­1_­­ FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION l__, i I I i ISEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR', i i i � : ��UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION ! � I Uj � co C> m V_ 0C 00 m , ..) m . I t­- 00 :: C111 (n ULJ . "...., Uj to I--. _ I—j "Wftft I— CN < � :D z1z Uj W * " x Q) _< C:) LL cc C) t-- Uj ty) I— V- - =) ce) (D7) U) I 00 IN I— LU co AL "q@L 1� .­� LIJ to W IR F- c> (1) W C14 � m m pp, 4 z . . - < W mi z "r 0 P_ 3: a D " W Cn _j I,- W IV- }_ 40 4 4m foo 40 4 4 4m .4 0 .4 ow 0 0 to " 4m ­­- � 1 11 , I�� �, n `­ mll � , I " , 1­'�,:" I I I I , ,�,,��,,�­:,�', I ��- '" , ­ -111, ,, I J "I'l-I 4 � "­ I I I 11 I I 11 �, I II � � � � "I " � � , �111 "I , l;"'l"11717 171! �1, 7i,, I I �­ , I I � , 1� , "I � � : , ,; I . I I , I I I I I I I I � , 1 , "I , I � , I - ,, ,' � ,,, � I I ,� " "I "I I I I I , 11 ` "I I— , 11 I I � , I ,�111111 " ­1"...,,,ilk`I I ,�� , 1 , I I ` ll ll "I 1-11111 : I 1 � " , I �­ � I , �" 1 ,�,,, " 11 I , ", I 11, , 1� , - �, 11 � ..... , ,,­­'­, 1, 11 I- I 1, , ,­ 11�1111l�1111,` .... . I I "L � , I I , _ I � ,, , , :11Z, �%�, I � � , I , , - , 11, " I , , I I A , , I , 11 , ", �,,,,��,,,�,� , , 11:1,11�14's Date: 1 1 1 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 1 1 1 Drawn By: I C R L I Checked by: SBP : , Revisions i � � � : � � I I # I Date � � � � � �� Description � : I � � I � ,\ 4/15/2019 /-- � � � � ADDENDUM 03 : � : � � I I I I 1 4 ZL 6/21/A2019 : � I : � � LU/PERM IT � i � : I � � � I RESUBMITTAL #1 � e I ", I z , 11 - � '"' 1V`6ERT1(-,D,;AL DAAATUM LAKEHAVEN NOTES NGVD 29 THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 'WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS' APPROVAL BY THE WASHINGTON SATE MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ON JUNE 8l, 1994 AND ANY ADDENDA THERETO. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90' lei CO #2 6W 88C0 ST 202+24.01 29.5 RT RIM 492.96 IE 488.90 (PRIVATE) /---'IEX 8" CONC CRD#SO086 CONNECT TO EX SSMH MH 5-9 (TYPE 2-60 LADDER NE C�Z �35 N 125012 E 1276601 S 300TH ST STA 16+37.91 5.0" LT SEWER STA 206+48.4p 4.5' LT RELOCATE COVER TO AVOID MINI -ROUNDABOUT REINSTALL LADDER TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH EX SSMH MH 32-A BOTTOM SHELF N 125005 E 1276787 I E 475.00 8" S IN AHBL #100 S 300TH ST STA 18+23.21 4.1' LT NAIL AND WASHER N: 125029-5475 E: 1276579.6688 .......... -482-61 _EV A , 1�' C 7 FX 8 ONC f '-b 1+ +0 jo TW 5 IL N11 rn, 0 ci) cr$ "I Al v4- CN 1 0) QO do 1,0 co� 00, (0 (0 (0 mom uo C0 cli 7 A 'CONNECT T) EX MONITORIIN Q IVI I I TYPE 1-48" STA 206+17.9 501 -711 9, 01 9 �,�ADJUST RIM TO GRADE: 482.38 IE 477-35 (8" S) IN 14.7 1E 477.25 (81' N) OUT ' " PVC + TO EAST OF MH (PRIVATE) SDR35 @ 7.3% 8 " PVC I V I? SDR35 @ 2.6% (PRIVATE) 7! Cl) ....... .... ...... ....... . . .. . ...... . .. .. ........ Cf) 489 LO . ..... . . . ........ ... .. ..... ... .. .... .... T b. A M H #2 TYPE 1_48 . . ........ _7,-RIM 491.80 STA 202+24.0 97 IE 484.80 (8" W) I N IE 484.80 (61) S) IN .... ..... ..... ... tC) IE 484.70 (8" E) OUT ..... ..... .... + SS-01 AND SS-02 I(PRIVATE) 28 LF 6" PVC SDR35 @ 10.6% (PRIVATE) .. .... ... . __j 490 C== """REASE INTERCEPTER C_ C== 1 E 488.66 (611 S) I N IE 488.41 (611 N) OUT ---------- 5- SEE MECH FOR DETAIL t, #3 sbco 49 1 - ------- -- STA 202+35.02 29.5' RT RIM 492.26 A IE 489.40 b 4 STA 202+89.0 IT 4 (PRIVATE) z TEE CONNECTION ----------------- -------- " PVC Li C 5 SDR35 @ 1.0% 491- t, NVA (PRIVATE) 20�+ 6 4 r -&'48 88MH #1 TYNN%E b. STA 204+10.9 5 �.6 4 RIM 490.90 Ag 0.:- - a 6 C-35 IE 482.83 (8" W) I N ...... ........... IE 482.73 (8)1 N) OUT -9 0 -4 PER LWSD STD PLAN 0.1 491 _V I M"u C)ID-V4 I C== DID Z3 'i 4 (PRIVATE) I N 4 e, k YI R 6" SANITARY SEWER t, Ilk CONNECTION TO 22 LF BLDG J 8" PVC PVC IE 489-00 (-4') 87 LF 6' SDR35 @ 5.57% SDR35 @ 1.0% (PRIVATE) C-35 491- PRIVATE) C-351 2 00, twoom "A 0, Wo R 6" SANITARY SEWER "MAIN& AWMANNA to tomwo ON MONO ommimw 4W,40iww *Now to amommo CONNECTION TO ftiosima ammama an Ammon 4do� demo tonam domem M ,am= 40 Clow mom W amm =me 40 =MW snow 40 UNNO mom W "now "Mm a) ammom NownwAgonow ammoo 40 voomo 40 ajow INWOOD 40 4ititow 40NOW 40 011" 0 0/0 00,00, ol ol �0' 1`0 .00, of 1 0 1 0 .1 0 I'll ........ ... C-353 C-354 Know what's below. Call two business days before you dig. am"M #Now* ... ..... . . ..... K EY MAP PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR 230 PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING 4 4 4 CONCRETE PAVEMENT <1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER PRE -SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 �i I'M,) CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN 6 V0 DETENTION FACILITY 11 51 �70RM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS co SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH B_ O-LLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER WATER SERVICE LINES Y) FIRE SERVICE LINE FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION 'SEE C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR',! iUTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION .4* CIO C) V_ C11) co co C114 Cn _j C) W zc: U) LL cc Uj 00 Uj c> z <Uj Mz IMM100 0 Da. 0 U) Uj Uj 40 ADI oWiM 6 Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL ec e y: Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/2019, LU/PERMIT zj' RESUBMITTAL :1 1� � 1� I I � � I , _ � - ---I- 11-1 NGVD FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90 p a m m Is m m mm E C=0=351 MATCHLOINam S E S'N' ' 'm 4a 491MED 40mm m 4mmm emam m Mom 41111�ill�ll�l�ll p � to ONE" 40 4mum 4mumm ft MEND 400mm m Mom 41mmop Gomm amma m domm come 40 Em 4m1pm Go 4mm 4D 4momm 40"m "I 1 04040 ONES 10 Gomm � F so 40 4mmm 70 § ,", " 0 "", 01 � ,�,,,, ,• / "r 11 k """'1111�,__ , f 4 1% ,\ / I � / / $ , / I / / / 411% "" I , ,1.1-111", If,---, '­­­­.­­.__ � ­ � \ 'i � ,I i \ _­­11_­_,,q,4),__ , ,'_ \ ­­­­ "',""", I - 6 11-11- , i '14 """' , ", " , , ;.� " , I ''I ,111,,,� ",1 ,­� � , " ­11 � � , ­__, _', I i'/�",1,/,,�,,,,/' " " // " I I - ,,,, ,,� " , "" ;"/ ,"', , ,/ ,1 Ill/ ,*", /" 1, "' "' " " " , , �', ", " I , " "I , , , , "", " 110i _,,/� 'I e� � , , ,",>`,'�,, , ', " /' ", " " ,", " "; " , ­1 ." ,,, "/ , " " ", "" /" , 1� " / / 'Ill' � , , , I I , . " " / ,/ "",/ ,,�',,/ I "", "I, ;1 I , -, /" , , ,/ "' "✓ " , "I , " /, , � I" " I , , " - , " / " , ,,�,, .11 ,/� �,,, " ,""', /­, ,/ ,,� i, "/" � / , '' ,� I 1, , / '1111111�111,1111*, / % I ,/ , - ,/ " , �/,,.-/ ,, , , ", ", � , " " , ," . , __ � , "", 'i, -1 1� z " 11 " ,,/"" __ --- I --" _,", ,�,* / "', / -�,,�",/ ,,,,,, ,,,, ,, ,,,, I /' / " ,/'/ ,,, / , * `,� Z� -,,77/7- -1-1 - , '1�11, I'= - ____ ,f,, - ` � ", ," , -, ,/ /,�"/"',/"/,�,�:"" ­1111, ,/,", ,,,/ " �,, ,� ,,, I I , . � , � ,, i , __ � , "', / "Il, ,� 4,41, �= �j,�-�117���-����,�,,�-,,,,-,, �,,- ;�,� ,, ,� IgIll U'11.i 411& '1_111�11­ I , . I - , "`�_- , 4, � �,W ­ U,N �'V, _14111�il - - , " ,,, - I ��, 1,�, 1, , "K I �A�rl �,�117,�ll,"""�'ll"�r�--l""I'll'I . . . . . I'll :: �� "m , , I " , __z / -11, " " " " , � 11 "I _1 .... , ,i� " ", , " " " i 6 "', � N . . . . . . 1 4 I " I " I " i"�i""', t�, " , j "I'll , , , " , ", 11 , 6:�,,�, �"',', I I ., I ", , , 11 I ,:i�fi�, I I .111�11 " �', t� " 14all"I ,,,,,­,,,,,A*A� 4 ,,�,� illl�'111�1 , P111 �,,�n,A 1, � �. �,\�� ,,," , I Ig "; , I I "��l �111 � I I / ,4 J N A '111,11 "'I'll, , \ 11, *' C, `­ - " '111, * I 1� i A 4 11 , - I I .11, � ,4 - " / � 4 ... :�"""",""""","""I'l,"",�,,�',t't't't't'�", , I , ,� vt , I 1�� ,�'11'�' - `.,"",- %1�11 . - , , � , Z',_ ,� � 0 11,111k "I I � �', 1� - _' "111,11I"41,11 111111�; "I'�"I'll�Ill",'�Ill""">-', z 'I"_ , , 'k� _-M, , 11 11111�1111� .. .... .. ," "fl, ,,,,,� F, /I , 'N' , a N ,,�� 4 �, �i 1, " b� C. 4 "I ­1� I I I 11,111 ti� 4 (� I �, - 11 ­­� , 11" 1� I '_ 1� "I , "" I � �""I".",:�"""",,�Ilt,t�lI , * 1.111"VI 14��1111111111111%f� I '_"""M, ,,� , , , , , , , , , , , - , ,i , , , , " " , "' 4 !'�t ,`�'! ,� " / - I 11 .11, " , , I ,�, , 4 N ", 11 "I , � ­;;;;�11;�,_­,,� .... .. . ",'­K�IW4111�1111 _1�11` - , �,f�, 1A, -, " � -1-.1.1-1 �, ,, 11 ,1�11 ���i ,,,�,��,",'�,��',.�,,,�,�,,�,,�,,,�,-,',*'I 11 __�,,,, I �'i, I I - I I 1, '. -- - -- , ,­', � � �� � � �� ­_:,,,. ,,,- " -,:,-, � 'i � ,�, -, - -,-.-- ­­ 11�,6� 'A 'It" , " " ­1111111,11,�, I , __ .... ... ,",__ � , ----_-- I � ��, "��,,�,�,,��,t =., "'T"I'l 111111�i. '�,�I'll",�'I'�"I"�'��'ll""I'�',�lI - -. "_,�,� ",!""�,��,,,�,,�,,�,�.�.'�,,�,-.",'I ... �.�l--,,�.,��,,�,,,,,,,,,,�,,,,,,�l,,,�,,,�,,�,�,�,,,�,,�,,,,,",��,.',�,,4� ,�, , ,�� , �,,��"":.,�"�ll'i""Y"�� " ! � "� - �, i 7-_"��p !"Al%il ,,:�1,1111�1�*_'_,�'_ ',`,',f;'1'1",f',`,`�4 -.11-1-11,11�l".,-","",�,,�,,�",., I 'I, I , , 11­11`­�i,kll , , Ri 11­Ai 1�7:111","­,"", I 'I'll . �'� . . .. .. �.��',�,,,�,��""�".�,�,��,,'.,,",'-�', """", ", :_.'­_:, --l-," 1&,,,,��,','� ,,,C-,�,'K�ll,'�,,�'',I��,���,,�,,,,;���,,�,,,,,�"lil�'ll""�I - I 1­ * - - "', �, ./,,,-, ," Al� ." "I I I -- -77 , I -----­�' , ""I, I \ " 11P, 7, I 11 I" 7 7 ;'t -/L `� " / , 1 1, 4� , , , , 4' �,,, � "I' ", ,,, , _ \ , '� , �'4 '� 41 / ?`�', 1"1,111�11t� t� / I ", "' I , " 1� I / " L", " , , " 1, , , " ,, , , ," ', , �' , ' '� b , N 'I, � 11, , 11 , / �,, , , " , , """ , , " `1\b, / 4 � , 7 1� � � % '�l 1> I .1 , �' I 1, �,,� ,,�, ��, , , 4 4 ,�' " I '1111�1s, , , , 4 " , , "' , �11 1 6 , " ' ' A r" I 1 ,\, I �, ' ' , ": I A", ,� I I N D. 4 1� , " " I � I A t, , 4' , 1, , " N � 4,, ,,, , � � � N 111"I , I I I 1, I \ � I I 0�11\ I" A 11, 11 -17, " I I "I I I � � I I , 1 , , " �­ , , , , I , I " I i I I A I �� ,,� 11 N, 1, I 1� , �, , 1�, � , " ,; , ,,,, ,, 1� I , I I 1, , �N A .� 4.1 � � �0, , 111� '4 1 � 1, 'p I 1, I 11, 13 1 ) \ I 'I � I , I I , 4 I I I / , I 1, ,/ . , I / I "I , I r" " I I , I � ,�,<�, , 1 t, i ,', , , , I I "� 1 " , , r. " , It, 1� LI-111 I "I "I , P 4 , A � L11 4 N , I N, , � 41 , ,� , I " I I " , I I , t� 1 4 " 11 \ , 1, ii� 1, � A " , � ", , 'I, , \11 N 1 '4 '/ " " I I", , , , , I iN ,�, , , , , , , � ""\, " ( '', , I , , �'A i I " I , - " "' " , I , I t. 1, �, ,,, , ,,,' �, " x, , , �' , I ,f� 11 v ""', �,�", � , I C, ,� , " A " . rA I ,, t� I I I , I I I I " I � 1- I , � "I "I � " , L, I , I , I I , b , , I\, 1, : ' .1 X, , "" E�� ,�N, " ", 4 , , '' � � th , � I , , I , A i,�l ", I " , �11111 � i_-, , I 1 4 �, I 11, I I I . 11 " 4, ', "I . " '' "" I 1'� ,, '1� U 'i"i 11i," , I " � 11 11 I 1� , , � , � I I , r, t., I , I, "I, /� , i 4 11 I , , 1. 4� , � � 4 � �1, , , "' , I ,l 11� , , � I t� 1, � I I ", \,, 4 " , I � , 4 I, 1" "", �� � Ifn, , �1";," fe � , I , , �",:, . , , , , �, ,,�,, , 1 4 t. I I 1, I 1, /� � t� , " \ " ,/ 1, � 11 , I '. t, / 1A , , I A I I 1, I 111�� , I � I " , I I �! A I 11 \ 11. I I I I \� , , ", , ,C] I I (� ", i;)'% "I , � \, , �:,,'�, ,�,�, � �,, , > �-,�,,,-,�� f-� ,,,,' �. 4 1 � " li� 1/4 " , � � " ii, , / I , I 1, / , I ,,�,,,,,, I I � , , , I t" I " , ,,,,, ,� ,, , , � , ,4 \ 11 I / " % 1, � , I , , I 1, � , , 1, , 4 t, , , \ 1, ;,� �-, :" " ,. , 1�, I , ,� t " 11 I ... " b, , , , I X I C� I 11 1� , � ,� , , � li� A lli�11 , 4 , , , :,� ". " " A , "" , \ , "I I N, 4, , , ,,, � , � I 1, I ` , , , / , , 11", "I ,,, � " , , , , / , 1, %1 " " , , , , , � , I "I I I � , I •,qx � �/ " I 1� " ,,, -: " , ", I �,', "I ,, , 4 /: " 1, E�� ,,, , � I "" "I "I" ,/ 11 "I C, .,�>, ,,, , " " "�', , , , , , " 4 ,:", ,,� "I �,,, If ,�,,,� p , I .11 I" , � , � , , " " " 1, 1, t� V,,;',,�>, O', I � I , ,� �, 1 I 11 r'4 N I 1� � ' , I—' ", , I " 4 , " 11 " / -1111, " ,�� , ' ' ' � � � , I � I I " 111,J I I �f' , 4 t� , . " 4' ' ' 'i , , ­ " � , 1, A , I / I , , 4 , 0 , , 11 ,� , __,_�_Al __1 Ill\ , I , t, I", ���', """, -, ' I is, 4 t� - __ _,�__,_,;�_.,'.___.___/ - .1., '� ,, �1) , \ 1 4 11 I I " f t I I'll, liill� t� V� , , I I i I , " 4 ""11111- "' 11� , 11 "I I, _1 , I" ,�, 1�, � "I ` [!�!j \ � " I I/ 1 I 11 I I I I I / �,` "j "11� , 11 ­1 - , ill 1, j \ // � I , "", /, , ) "i'l-­/ / 11 1 I� V'� I \\ / I 0 1 , 1 ,---- -- ­-- ---;��:- ___L��___. � I � , ..... i 11 1-1111- , f"­­ 1\ , , 1� 11 il "I I-_,_� I 011 , I � I � � , I 11 �01 I I , " I I / .... , , ;I1 H I I I � )! �:�""II.1111"11"I'�"­ � I �1 �1,1,'1'�',`",' ,_I " "4 / I 1, , ,1_­_1111­ 1 I , M"„, 1,11, ��, ,1 , ", ,�, ) i, 1 i "' 'I ;,,�l I 11 � I �f I I , , I � "I'�; I � 4 , � I .... I I � I'll I I , I I IV,/ - ',"111.111-111 "q I I , , , '� I I I � I I � I I I I - - 11 I 1.11- - - 11 11 � ­­ w�-1--l-1-111.�.-�--l'�,�-11-1�-,�-11--l-11.�ll,�",,--",-,-�� __ 1_11 11 - 111--l-1-11 _11 I I- ,� I I - I- 1111111-1 �� 11 , I I � I ,,,, , ,,, ­­ VV , 1 i I I I / � i �, I � I a , W"pli,iiiiamwou" p0t,eiva"Vi'mm'o tSmT,QpVwftu=fv4 MMIX00tolum R=Q'M1M`i'1i,m1kA1 , I VM , ,;' I , "I m" C 11 , I NO 01� - , '/ 1, �, , / I o N 11 , ijl '! C11, �­ I , ,,,,, 1, " � , ," . , K I f� ,� joF / , , �,� ,�'Iw / ;, �4011 !\:"S;" " " � �' llvl�_, 'I', ,�,00, li", I LO � �' ,, `i,�l ,, , V () I , "" V 1� ,1111, I i , I �`,�_�!�,,�,��',' �� 1, I I 11 1 � "I � I 11 I "I 1,"'o 1 I co I I I � � 01111"I'll" I/ �, _f, I 0, H " � '/ 11 ) I � / j I 1011 �11 I I / 1, / / � N I �, l / DNS J-% -- ONIN DNV 81:1 . I Wd ON I 1 ,,,,, 11 "'111 "I ,,,�� I I�',\,ii I i 11 , 1111/,,/1 ! I ,,",l :'1',1 � �'j / 11 I �i I jif �, I tl I 11 000000, " '� i'/ / ) I .1, I 11 I , ( �` � Iff I ,,�,* I "All I 1A I , / I , I " W , jj t ,o I I (" f1) I ,� � . ..... .. .0. . ........ ,drys} I // 1'1'151�1$1, �� �Vrliil I I 1, 14 , I I ill""`,�'11'11"?X3, "!" k , W > , I , I :1 I I'll I I I/ I I 11 ,' , / / I 91' 9i , � I I '11 � A , I , 1 i � ",-l"I'l � I "I :"", 11 i"? I I I 11 I'll "I , i' � I � k"11, , L'I ,, " , , 1"1'1"1'1'-�"111 , x�� , �1'1`11111111 11111111, ' I � � ��"\11�1 � 'J� � .... . il�1111111 'I "" 'C. ,,, 11 �,\, ", , , , "I / 11,I ��,`,iii 10 z I / �' 'i" I "I /1111 I "if,", "� I " I ,/ - m 11 , �i' I, f"'I 'If �, 11 I I'll, " 1 , I , ,� � ,,,,,,", I / r� , I �,I' 1" �11 "Ir � m , I I 1, I � ,I I l � I 1"', f I i'o I , " I " il i 11 I,� A'" I / a 0 ,,­ I I I I ,� I I I , , 4 I I I I I , , � 1 � " ", � 'i" I � , � I Ili 1�, If Ni fi, t. I ,,, ! 1, I 4 li� I I U) A t,_ --- - t, I'll ( � & �___' "4 - ,�, , , I , I i A, I 11 ,,,, � , r111 i � I I ", ,I 4 t, I i i i '11, " " tP 1"'! )I 4 ;';, I ,,;, i I I i I I/ 1'�',,, ,,, I I i i ol 11'' : i .,, " I I I , 111 ! I , , , ,,,,,, 11\11, I I 11 I I " ", I , I I , � I , " ", , I � �`1 / 1 " , " I I , , I 6 I 11 i 11 I "I I , , , , , "I , 1 , " 11 , , 1� "' , 11 , , A "I 111101,1111 I "I "I � , I'll, I � I -1 I I I I - ' �'7'7'7777777777 � " 7 f\� 11 L:� '. A , , ,- � I "I 4 J I -sx, . . ... ........ __�_ �,m ,��l,,,�-�� .... 1�'�":" , - � �, 1 , I 1 ',',� , 11'`,,,"",'­,�­"��,,,,��, , - L IJ , , ,,i, , , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,,, , �, 'jf>: "I ',"'% """ "'�� "11!�­, , i,�f,',,�,�,� i ,;��,if "I'll -ftvm ' � \',��-""\, , plo i � , I I 1 ",)"�,�,�,,,,"���,,�,�,�"�*7 - �`11 "� I " ­ 1011, , �� "^`"W**__1**-0--_"_"_� �'��4 11 ,�ll',,,-,�,.",�..,.""�.�,,,,,,�",.,�.--"-,.-, toxv, I i I ,. �,r I i., I -7-111-11--11-11-1 11 , �,-,­,xwowof,� v. _mawm, N�110,�,�1/1'�ll,�,,�,�,�t��'I'll,� vamngmm�m mmV,=W&WN/' mmm1=Mm1S,=t,=TrkW , , r," - � , �, , .. ..... F'w I'll i'�,3 �% I " "I" �.,�",,',.'�,�",,�� .. .. .. i­'�,,,',��� It" , I"IFIF, I � �` e R1111 I 1 1, , I I fl 11 IV I 1­ t­1041[,, LANE I Z: , / NOPARKING, - FIRE "I , , I I'] , / �'/? / �1, "\ I ;/� I I I , �111/ , �11,,-,, ) I 'I, ", / // 11 ( "'I", I—, , 11 � '1� ;""� 11 "', le, \ �_�_i_� 11, =Mai I/ / ,11 � . . .... ,,,� , / 1W ��',�:"`J '1�1 - j � , 1v1,1.11.111_'_­­--w __11111 ­111-11 11 "','', , " 1,f, , 1� � V , I'll, 11 ,11 I -,,I'll - 1111_11­'_­__­­ 51�1 I I , , ; , W'---��---�'-,---"r,-,-�-,-,--,_:' / _f­1(_,; ,.�" ,� I ._1 xm , / A &� - I / " , - I E`INVI fl ':'1'1j,,_.,. ON � -11L - ONDIRVJ ON "' 0 ,/.O",�4,.-A,"'�����.� -- ".. _INVI g = �V I !I N b� I 11 ; 4 �1,14V e N t�> � 1,?"11, - I C e) 1:41 4 1 7 ) ,/ , I '),11_1"'/&�, I I ". 11 111,11,111,111, / I I / ----, d"11, "', 11, 11, / 1 :2 f____ t� I I -_', I � I , 11, U I 11 , 61, I I 1 � w•._ I I i�_ I-,- -----__ ,-- '111 I I , � `_ I I � t� 1� " I ,__� - 11-1.11- ­­_111 -,"'I'll 111111-- .1111-1- .1111111-1 ,_ - _7111_1_1___,___ ... 3mvRAL-1 ----= ...... 111111"," ­__ ­ --"-* ------------- � ....._.�� \ -,-,,,,,, "I'll ....... ,,_ 1­11,­,­­11­11,­', - x _x Mffi Qm 7___� , "I 1­11 ", _ I - ;;;,- ­ - ""_ -_ '-- I _,__'�11' " ­­­"" ,,2' .111,11-1- '_,",,"', '",", "" "11-11.1, - ""I'll, ­_ , �� "I , f, � f; I __� ,,, ,I, , ,,";,',!,, �) , , I 1 1­ � 11 / I ___ _i� , ,, -_��_, .... ­ " 1� , "I -"-, __'_ I'll ­111 ­­ ..... . ___ � I - "' " � � , ""-,),- -%; . ... .... _, ­ --- - 11-1111,_ `1­1111", �'­­­.­ , "I :�­__­ ­­11- ___11 11.1-1111 111111"', '11-11-1 `111111-- , , " _,� , " ,,,,, I " I , � , ­­11� I-, I'll 11,11--il ­11.1"', .111­_111111_, I � '1­1 -1 ­11- 111-1111 71111� __"__"_ 11 IN.;.,.,, I , `:'��`­­ __ ,� ­,"",_ ­_­­ .1- ,,,,,, "'"""' ­111-111,111 " - I , 1-1--:1- ''I'll- 1_1�"",�,�,: ��__��_ , 1, � 11, I", 11, 11-111,11, "'', , 11 �­,� 'I ", ..... `-�"­­ ­'­­11 '' I , ­­ I I ",­1 1 " ,,, I I I , ­111111 11 ­ )11- ...... ",-1-1 '"' � I � -­ � _. � = , "', � ­­- . .. ..... , ""! I F'111'�', f ,,'_ , : )i ) '' ", " 1--.�­� I I , , � ", ,,� 11-1111 " '' - ­­ , "I I I I , / I i � , " I '111",",_ , I , I ", I " ­ I I ­­ ...... � � , " I I I , "" ""'' � /_,", �� � _­­­ �, �1, ­­11-- _­,�-, . ........ _,,_,�:4 " , ,,, , , ,_"k , , "I I ,. 1� 4 'I, I I I 1­111 i _� ,_,�, ! 1; - I "" 11 , �, , _,��', 111­1­11 - : 11 ...... ­_:, 1 � I '. � �­­�,,ii ­� .... .. - - , "' I 'I, ,:, ­,", 11­_�­ � ...... ,, , 171117 1, I , , �; ­,­, , ,, I'll" �41�­ -­_ .... I i � i , �) i� " 1 I � � !,,,, , _�,� , � ,� ..... "" 11 ","i''77�' , "I ,'__ _1___1 ,__ 1 , � � ", � I 1�1 �_____ " ......... � ,,,-_�, ___, -1- �', - � , "", " I , , I", " ,,,J�­11 ,,,,_� I " "' ....... .. � " ..... . I , ­­;-, " , � " �� j , 1, -, �_, �f�ll 1 , � -, "I'll 11-­11" , 1�1 ,4, , � . .. ... 11, I I � "", ,­;,,�_ 1�7'­­�" I """',_ f I "' , . , �,"� ...... � "', ""11111 ""',", , / � 1, � i I I -, fl, � , '11> ­111111 '''', "',""", ___ 111-III., , \, ,,, ij, '' - , ,�,, I -1-11-1 --- '�� I ­", 11, , - ! "'�-n,�_,, ,, _11­ 1-1111"I'll 11- , ,,,, ", �­�, � '', , 11 ''i �­ , � , ,, , ­1111 ­­,�­', . ..... - ­111_ _,��, � ' ......... ,,­­ \ , .11-1-- � ,, ,,,,, �,_ A 11 �­1­11111111, " .... .... I - - I � I I `111111111". ­­­ I i ,--l-, I f ­­ � - ­11 1­11 "Ill-, 1-111.11111 - ....... .. I 1 '� . , ,-- I .-I'--,- __.­'­ --- =� � �', "" 1-1-1, 11111.1," ""I'll"" ­­�­ __1111 ,, � I i, 1-1 i,% I "":, I , / , , " L �­­,­� ') \,,, , , _.. .� '11-11-11- 1-1.111-11 , �,,, \ , � ,.1.111111 1111j t �,,", ", ,�, ­,, , �, �11111_'_ ........ . ...... , �l, , , ""._,", ­�'111 I I I �� - "I", � � , I N' \ I", --,-, `_�­ .",", _,", '-"1,,,_­ .11 "', ... I'll, '111111-11" ­,""". "I "1­11111 I -­­­ ___ ... )" " I I'll ,f "":­­ ,,, , , r ­­_ , #A `1111- -­­ '11","111 _­­­ `_­­ - 1111-1 � ......... . i - , !_j , __­­ __4_ ... � "', \, '\,, "'' � 1 N - 1, , ,,, ­111.11111 "I , ,_ I I , ­�111111 "I'll'.-, '­­!111 _111,1­1 , , , ­­ , 1 " � ,_ I � �, , , , -­", �' 'r I 1\ ­­ I / .�� 11-1111-11 ____ 1. " I I I ­­11­11 ­­", 1-11-11111. ­11-11- 11-111111I.- , _:,", " , , � " I I ,­,�­,_,_. 1\11111111� ,,, �1, I I ,'' - "' '' I'll 1­:­111 1111-- " ­1`� /�_;�,, I V 1 '. , I ,, ,", __ I'll , � ) 1_114,J,,�,... ...... -, � - �,, , � .. ... ... . - ,,i­­­�­,", I I -, ,-`1­1 111,�, � , - 11 .-" /111111111111111 �, 1-1-1 I ­­­_ .11111111- ­.11-1-1 11-1-111 "I �11 ,� ,, ", � - - - _'__�­ ­1 " 1 ,�', ') ',"N' I I" ,� ---� - I'll ­1­11111 " , _ I I ­­ ­1111 - ­­ 1.11,11 � "IX, I ,',,�---- I—- , ,","'11-1 , ,,,-,,.,, I ­11111__. -.'*"" --I'-,-- -1--'. �,, � - -1111, 11 '­U 1�1, I I'll I , , 111111.1111,11 I , - � � " I ": il I 1'\ ,-,Z,,�­ � � A�"" I � , .�,_ ,,__,1', ""Ill., """ , " , 1111- _1111�1._,',�,��_"­'-­" \, "I , 111� I , � 11:1"1 11 L01 r 11�1 I � � ­,� ,,, , I I - 11 , ,� �", , ,, I" I , A I / ,,, ,, ,� :­ I - "" "I, "� ,"I I ""', , I '\ / �� 'j, , _/ " \11, "Ill, 11 , V�1 � �, � , ) �' 1%1, � ", _­ , , "I I �...,_ I- I .11-111. \ � 11 f - ­". " \ I I """', -, if ", N\ " 1, I I 11- I � -I 1 -44 1 , "I � I 1 11 - \ \ \ % N1, ",* "I-,, , I" �,%� I 14", , \ i, I'll, '-',, .,,,," I 11 \ 1, "I � \ \ 1\ , \ I 'I'll \�, � , 11 i , ) \ \ � 1�"" � �1 ,� 1� � I � \ ,\, 1�-,, \ �� N, \ " I , ,, � � " � 1\ \ " "� , � , i " / ,­-, I , \ I I / 11 � I , " � il "i, W 11, �N I 1 1. 20 0 10 20 40 ­­ ?N!9= =" Scale T'=­201, 1;4�1111 kj I I , i, I I I , , �11, ;­ 00 *ON=* dolum PROPERTY LINE 1.11) �,/') _�_�__ , , , , "�,� " ___1_1�1, - - ,,,1-,,_1 -----.-EX CONTOUR (INDEX) ) , � , , ___ , I ­­_ _", �� ,_�, 11-­_ ­­, - - /"-"- EX CONTOUR - - 230--- - PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 112,31 11 - 11 I'll 11 SPOT ELEVATION FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION I I I I , I , I , , I , I I � I I I I I EX BUILDING /,�",/ / '/ / " /' // ,,`� // , "/ '/ I/ '�, , I,,11,� ',11 �,-,, z--/- /" PROPOSED BUILDING 4 < < 4 17 4 ' 11 4 4 :a CONCRETE PAVEMENT < I-' le 119 0 0 0 0 0 " 0 - 4 .1 ,. � HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE -"---"-"-,--",-,--,-,-,---------,-------,--,--,-- 1--___,"'., ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT I 1._­_______ ­_­.__­___­­ ______ HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT ------�,�-----�1--�r----��-l-l-"--'-��-'��-�-----�"---'--�--- ,..,!.*' . I , , .. .... %� .. . .% - I GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB 1. � ------ _ ­ CURB AND GUTTER *. E ____11 _T1 . q1* 71 * 41 41 N111 N/SAND FILTER 611R; QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD /1`11`111 " , , I 'CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 "I IA CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 I I I'll I �� STORM DRAINAGE PIPE,--k"""_", "­", ,,I , I � f""', �f, �_�,� `� W�, i�_� �"-"1'3��,,� �,��i ii�f,l ,,,�:, DRAIN {­,­­�­,,� i""",�,,,�-'�:",�i"N,�,�,�1),�\11"�r��'..I�'ll�,��,,,,,,�',,,,',,,,��,:��'�,,,,:)""",",�,',,,,,',i,',,', I � !�,,�'Ai ,,, I fo DETENTION FACILITY , 1! " I � 1(�?l , ,q, �' \, 11' , 1, � 11 STORM DRAIN CLEACUT 11 ") FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT 11 ­11 1,i DOWNSPOUTS &I-^ V V 1.111,11, I -11 SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT mjlljjqq SIDE SEWER CONNECTION 0 SSMH ..�� BOLLARD 0 *,..� � _ FIRE HYDRANT � '! � `­�I,­ WATER FITTINGS i I ­1�111v .,_ �� I " �,,r__,&,i . . . ...... ­1111,111, 1-1-1 1111-11: I ,, L- I 11 - I � 4 !, , WATER SERVICE LINES ��: I � I I , ,_�� WATER METER , � I WATER SERVICE LINES 0 L11-1 - 7� i I i I FIRE SERVICE LINE , I -- A tl"-"",,-",i,-,-�-�,,"",�i C,.,� � " � I 11Y`��,.'f�,'�,,,_�, `, " � i FIRE SERVICE VAULT , lb�V " 1"i"', � � -, �, ',,)_;�1,11,1."] AI , � -1-1-1-1.1-11-1-1 - FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION yd � , 11 I ,,I_, --- - F-------- ' C-6XX SERIES PLANS FOR I I I I I I ,UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION I - -4* 00 I a . U&J Cp IT- m cc M m Zz� . I � < co i'- N �Aw Q*) W ( n U-j W to � _j C� �_ --- *-*ft I_ N < 1­1 W Q) - < mi C.) U- in IM== cc mzc C) V_ tl- � I W Cn M) �- ,c-- - =) Cn 0 co I co I c1q �_ ui CD W W �- CD CD (n N I.., z . . � 4mmmg - ,t W z 0 7: 7- Do- 0 (:: U) W e � _j 1--W ­_ V--�- 40 4 4m 1 W40 40 .. 0 m 4m .M 0 0 4 400 4m 0 0 4 1 K1�fl �, �, v" I I I " 1 11 . , ,� I I I I I , , I ■ = , " , IMIN IIAII '40v 1, I "', I 1, I , , : AN;!"' , 9, I 11 , � � I , , f, , , ,�, 1I f! I I I " I , � I � I I f? , , I I , , , 11 � , , I I I , I 11, I 4 1� , , , ­, 1,11 11 11 I e � 11 " 4"':�;',"', ,1 "i 11 I , 61 11 I I I I , I I 1� � , � I , i�ii, _ 1. ": ,"": 1' "140i� ,, , " , " I " " " 11 11'­ 11 ,,� 11 J I'll, 1 III "" ­ 11 if,,,,,,',� . ...... 11 ,,, � ­Ap I I I I 11 , I I I 111� , 1 � , I , !, , 1'­':,� _ � "', ... 11 .,�, I , 11, - ­" I I 11 I � 'i. 11 . " i�', I ­ , , I I 11 , � � I , , "I I Date. , 1 04/15/2019 Job No.: 1 21739 Drawn BY: CRL Checked by: I SBP � I : � i Revisions � I � , I I I # Date � Description : , � : i 1 : . I : r 019 � z 4/15/2 : I I I ADDENDUM 03 1 � ; , � : i � � � � 6/21/201 9 ' I I � i � PERIL IT � � I � RESUBMITTAL #1 I 01 I , � i I J!Iii!� I � , I , *-I W, , �77 NGVD 29 FEDERAL WAY VERTICAL BENCHMARK 119 MONUMENT IN CASE AT INTERSECTION OF 20TH AVE S & S 298TH ST. PUBLISHED ELEVATION: 508.90' NO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (TCO) OR CERTIFICATE ■OF OCCUPANCY (CO) SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL STORMWATER AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS ARE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BT THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY. LA le 0 0 A Iff I& f Is l=%NEH/U%VEN NwTE%-Q=i THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAKEHAVEN UTILITY DISTRICT 'WATER SYSTEM AND SEWER SYSTEM STANDARDS' APPROVAL BY THE WASHINGTON SATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ON JUNE 8s 1994 AND ANY ADDENDA THERETO, allam% Na I PROPERTY LINE EX CONTOUR (INDEX) EX CONTOUR O PROPOSED CONTOUR (INDEX) 231 PROPOSED CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION EX BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT (AC) PAVEMENT GRAVEL SURFACING SITE WALL VERTICAL CURB CURB AND GUTTER IT, PRE —SETTLING BASIN/SAND FILTER 910`111 QUARRY SPALL DISCHARGE PAD AREA/YARD DRAIN CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 STORM DRAINAGE PIPE FOOTING/SUBSURFACE DRAIN y9 DETENTION FACILITY STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT DOWNSPOUTS co SIDE SEWER PIPE SEWER CLEANOUT SIDE SEWER CONNECTION SSMH BOLLARD FIRE HYDRANT WATER FITTINGS ,.""�,,�� ....... WATER SERVICE LINES WATER METER mail= FIRE SERVICE LINE I.X FIRE SERVICE VAULT FIRE SERVICE CONNECTION SEE C— 6X'X' SE-R IES, PLANS FOR', UTILITY CROSSING INFORMATION U-j %zt 00 C> It - cc co ZZ) 00 Cq (0 C/) W to C'4 uj U) X < LL Ct 00 uj AL W to re � � Cl) z m m Aff -do LLJ Z 0 0 C/) W UJ 40 • umr low:off► tt R. Date.- 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn By: CRL Checked by: SBP Revisions # Date Description z h: 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 6/21/A2019 LU/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 S p I A"' FOR EE LAN I.E. AND DIA 01 Q()l 1APP* I m 120 D.I. PIPE hill CC R ET E FIBER JOINT FILLER COMPACTED 45" BEND SUBGRADE DIA PER PLAN SEE PLAN FOR- I.E. AND DIA "PAVED AREAS IF ULLAINUU I 1Z) 11N CONCRETE PAVED SURFACE, PROVIDE cy. THICK"ENED EDGE POUR CONCRETE MONOLITHIC 12 SLOPE CONCRETE TO DRAIN 2% M I DRAIN PER GRADING AND DRAINAGE 03"x6" TEE WYE CONNECTION NTS CAN WASH STATION 500 ......................... 500 495 495 ....... FINISHED GRADE N ROW OF S ROW OF C/L S 300T H ST EXISTING GRADE S 300TH ST QO .......... ....... 30­00 490, 480 485 EX GAS FY AR( 480 FROM SITE III 11111 IN POWER • CR ING 207 LF 8 I_11VC SDR35 @ 2.6% 475 47V (PRIVATE) ............... ...... ...... ...... .......... 88mH d NG UMONTORI MH ....................... 47V 470 ................ ...... ....... .... STA .... . ..... ...... ........... RIM 481.96 Ir 477.35 - (8'f S) AN • OUT . . . . . • 465 31 LF 8 PVC SDR35 @ 7.3 % ...... (PRIVATE) b4MIN1 0-V CA X MrI 46V RON COVER AND RING 460 ...... ... ........... STA* 206448.4 '__4.5, ',, LT . , .............. . -------- ........ ...... ........ ....... RIM, 482:PGO . . . . . . .D FOR FOOTING DRAINS .5). IE' 475'.00' (8"' IN I-E - 475-#0,'.& (8�' - W) IN� I-E, 467.83, fig,, N) - OUT� FOR STORM LINES 45i4; E CAP 455 ...... .......... ......... . . ............ ....... . .... .. J) 0 0�) . . . . .. . 00 . . . . . . . oo Q0 .00 00 00 00 . . . . . . . C)3 00 . . . . . . 00 . . . 00 �- 0 Lij L LLJ L, .. . . . 0 . . . . Li Li L1_ ............. ....... ......... ...... ...... + 206NTS 206+00 2 0 pow+000% SANITARY SEWER CLEANVU T i ELBOW NTS 3 CONNECTION DETAIL * UTILITY LOC"ATIONN"OT 1. ELEVATIONS SHOWN FOR EX UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE OR PER RECORD DRAWINGS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE EX UTILITIES TO FIELD VERIFY ELEVATION AND LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY CONFLICTS IN ADVANCE OF ORDERING ANY MATERIALS. 1 it =201 H; 1 f) =51V IUNI 71, "Will, Date: 04/15/2019 Job No.: 21739 Drawn I By** 'CRL Checked by., SBP Revisions # Date Description 4/15/2019 ADDENDUM 03 ZL 6/21/2019' L U/PERMIT RESUBMITTAL #1 EW E R Mum A A I L ■